OpenStreetMap Note Activities of Kinsio for the last 12 Months
Overall Activities | 12 Months
Opened: 42 (57%) Commented: 12 (16%) Closed: 19 (26%) Reopened: 1 (1%)
Stats per month
Latest | Limit 250
Latest | Limit 250 | The colored events are made by Kinsio
Note#⏱️ Last updatedEventContributorComment
5340459
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 11 hours agoopenedKinsio
♦266
This exit no longer exists and there is a new currently unmapped exit earlier. This information from on-the-ground survey on 2026-06-11. via StreetComplete_ee 63.1
5303452
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 21 days agoopenedKinsio
♦266
exit ramp way needs to be moved via StreetComplete_ee 63.1
2~ 6 days agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
Moved.
5302319
Category: Unknown
1~ 22 days agoopenedKinsio
♦266
New exit ramp location (visible on Esri World but not Bing as of May 2026) needs to be drawn, old ramp way should be kept but retagged as demolished:highway since it's still visible on Bing imagery. Confirmed via survey 2026-05-20.
5281290
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 1 month agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Road here needs to be tagged as bridge via StreetComplete_ee 63.1
2~ 27 days agoclosedFlatbreadAndSmilingSunIsNiche
♦28
fixed!
5278961
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 1 month agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing turnaround via StreetComplete_ee 63.1
2~ 27 days agoclosedFlatbreadAndSmilingSunIsNiche
♦28
added
5277273
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 1 month agoopenedKinsio
♦266
There should only be a single way for the turnaround here via StreetComplete_ee 63.1
2~ 6 days agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
Updated.
5181507
Category: EveryDoor
1~ 3 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Duplicate GNIS POIs for church need to be merged and moved to correct location. Church still present, confirmed via survey. #EveryDoor
2~ 2 months agoclosedweblogdryads
♦2,137
fixed
5177637
Category: EveryDoor
1~ 3 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Car window tint shop. (Not sure which tag is appropriate.) Observed via on-the-ground survey. #EveryDoor
2~ 3 months agoclosedNeisBot
♦22,915
This note has the identical location and text as note https://osm.org/note/5177619 Therefore, it will be closed. #DuplicateNote
5177636
Category: EveryDoor
1~ 3 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Prosthetics shop, observed via on-the-ground survey. Not sure what the right tag is offhand. #EveryDoor
5177619
Category: EveryDoor
1~ 3 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Car window tint shop. (Not sure which tag is appropriate.) Observed via on-the-ground survey. #EveryDoor
4924547
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 9 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing exit ramp via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 9 months agocommentedjhaluska80
♦3,277
It's marked as demolished and the aerials looks like there are jersey barriers. Did they open it back up?
3~ 3 months agocommentedKinsio
♦266
Yes, it is open, can confirm by subsequent survey.
4~ 3 months agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
I think it was incorrectly set to demolished, it should have been disused. Regardless, I returned it to being a full link. You can close it again if you find it's closed.
5167936
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 3 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing road segment via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 3 months agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
Added.
5160678
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 4 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Road missing ring at end via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 2 months agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
Added.
5157796
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 4 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Unmapped off ramp via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 4 months agoclosedICT_maps
♦11,579
added
5151329
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 4 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing driveway via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 4 months agoclosedICT_maps
♦11,579
added
4724516
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Flock ALPR camera at this intersection, needs survey for precise location and direction #surveyme #deflock #OsmAnd
2~ 4 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Added by another mapper in changeset 176680424.
4724514
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Independent-pole-mounted Flock ALPR camera near here, needs survey for precise location and direction #surveyme #deflock #OsmAnd
2~ 4 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Added by another mapper in changeset 176922460.
4724512
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Two Flock ALPR cameras at this intersection, need survey for precise locations and directions #surveyme #deflock #OsmAnd
2~ 4 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Added by another mapper in changeset 174078744 and changeset 174078781.
4717948
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Flock Safety ALPR near here, needs survey for precise location and direction #surveyme #deflock #OsmAnd
2~ 1 year agocommentedCurlingMan13
♦53,468
Do you have a plan to check this? also,. what source are you using to guess that there is one here?
3~ 1 year agocommentedKinsio
♦266
See my reply on note #4723423.
4~ 4 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Added by another mapper in changeset 176632683.
4713929
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Independent-pole-mounted Flock LPR #surveyme #deflock #OsmAnd
2~ 1 year agoclosedooosssay
♦557
Added
3~ 1 year agoreopenedKinsio
♦266
4~ 1 year agocommentedKinsio
♦266
Survey still needed for precise location and direction, reopening.
5~ 4 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Direction added by another mapper in changeset 176542682.
4713838
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Flock LPR at this intersection #surveyme #deflock #OsmAnd
2~ 4 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Added by another mapper in changeset 176510039.
4712466
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Flock LPR at this intersection #surveyme #deflock #OsmAnd
2~ 1 year agocommentedCurlingMan13
♦53,468
Do you have a plan to check this? also,. what source are you using to guess that there is one here?
3~ 1 year agocommentedKinsio
♦266
See my reply on note #4723423.
4~ 4 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Added by another mapper in changeset 174081733.
5140730
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 4 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
In context of overlay "Surfaces" – Service Road – https://osm.org/way/20948789 via StreetComplete_ee 61.1: Nonexistent road, information from on-the-ground survey
2~ 3 months agoclosedJohn Kastner
♦333
Also doesn't seem to exist based on imagery. Deleted
5080449
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 6 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing exit via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 6 months agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
Added.
5080448
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 6 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing exit via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 6 months agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
Updated.
5080446
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 6 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing exit via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 6 months agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
Updated.
5080439
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 6 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Unable to answer "How many car lanes does this road have?" – Motorway Link – https://osm.org/way/51755276 via StreetComplete_ee 61.1: Off-ramp no longer exists; nearby new on-ramp also needs to be added
2~ 5 months agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
Demolished the off ramp, added the new on ramp.
4713839
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Flock LPR at this intersection #surveyme #deflock #OsmAnd
2~ 7 months agocommentedCurlingMan13
♦53,468
Looks like it may have been added: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12787318253
3~ 7 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Works for me. Pretty sure I tried to make sure to say something like "additional" for notes not referring to cameras already mapped, so I'll close this one.
4719689
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Are there any lane closures on the frontage road between the Walden exit and Rexora Drive? #surveyme
2~ 7 months agocommentedCurlingMan13
♦53,468
temporary closure or permanent?
3~ 7 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
I think this note is from when I was still working out the I-10 widening project closures here. Pretty sure the closure I have mapped is about accurate to the extent so I'm fine with just closing this.
4491324
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Road is signed as "South Dowlen Road" at the intersection with College Street, but this seems to be pretty new. Basically all other signs just say "Dowlen" but I know addresses in the area do have "South Dowlen" as the street name. Needs some investigation to see where exactly the transition from "South Dowlen" to "Dowlen" is. #OsmAnd
2~ 7 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Resolved this a while back in changeset #166113104.
4408096
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedskquinn
♦5,445
Does North 13th Street really lose the directional in its name going south from here?
2~ 7 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Extremely fun answer, actually: no, it doesn't, but most of this segment isn't actually part of the street at all. In the City of Beaumont GIS data the northernmost point of North 13th Street is the intersection with Toccoa, but there's a bit more that's not part of any property parcels, so I included that part as well. Fixed naming for the parts that actually belong to the street and retagged the rest as service in changeset #173864234.
4408095
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedskquinn
♦5,445
Should this in fact be North 16th Street as well, as opposed to (no directional) 16th Street?
2~ 7 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Seems so, City of Beaumont GIS data makes no distinction so I added the cardinal direction on this segment in changeset #173862981.
4429610
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is Voth still used as a name for this area? #OsmAnd
2~ 7 months agocommentedKinsio
♦266
Probably a good case for this one, as it was annexed into Beaumont relatively recently, in 1957. [1] [1] R. Wooster, "Voth, TX", in Handbook of Texas, Texas State Historical Association, updated 1 Sep. 2023, <https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/voth-tx>, archived from the original on 12 July 2025, <https://web.archive.org/web/20250712094034/https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/voth-tx>.
4429609
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is Guffey still used as a name for this area? #OsmAnd
2~ 7 months agocommentedKinsio
♦266
"Currently exists: No" in Texas Almanac [1]. Do note, however, that this seems to refer to its existence as an *independent* entity, not necessarily as a neighborhood. [1] R. Wooster, "Guffey", in Texas Almanac, Texas State Historical Association, accessed 27 Oct. 2025, <https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/guffey>, archived from the original on 21 July 2025, <https://web.archive.org/web/20250721050615/https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/guffey>.
3~ 7 months agocommentedCurlingMan13
♦53,468
So, will you be removing it?
4429602
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is Mount Evergreen still used as a name for this area? #OsmAnd
2~ 7 months agocommentedKinsio
♦266
"Currently exists: No" in Texas Almanac [1]. Do note, however, that this seems to refer to its existence as an *independent* entity, not necessarily as a neighborhood. [1] "Mount Evergreen", in Texas Almanac, Texas State Historical Association, accessed 27 Oct. 2025, <https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/mount-evergreen>, archived from the original on 28 Feb. 2024, <https://web.archive.org/web/20240228192102/https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/mount-evergreen>.
4429600
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is Gilburg still used as a name for this area? #OsmAnd
2~ 7 months agocommentedKinsio
♦266
"Currently exists: No" in Texas Almanac [1]. Do note, however, that this seems to refer to its existence as an *independent* entity, not necessarily as a neighborhood. [1] "Gilburg", in Texas Almanac, Texas State Historical Association, accessed 27 Oct. 2025, <https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/gilburg>, archived from the original on 29 May 2024, <https://web.archive.org/web/20240529220615/https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/gilburg>.
4429607
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is Pine Crest used as a name for this area? #OsmAnd
2~ 1 year agocommentedCurlingMan13
♦53,468
It is according to USGS Topographic Maps
3~ 7 months agocommentedKinsio
♦266
(I know this is the same as my comment on the others, but just since it applies here too, in case anyone else runs into one of these:) That's taking data from the same source as the GNIS import, so that's to be expected. Not really an indication one way or the other.
4429598
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is Calder Highlands actually used as a name for this area? #OsmAnd
2~ 1 year agocommentedCurlingMan13
♦53,468
It is according to USGS Topographic Maps
3~ 7 months agocommentedKinsio
♦266
(I know this is the same as my comment on the other one, but just since it applies here too:) That's taking data from the same source as the GNIS import, so that's to be expected. Not really an indication one way or the other.
4429597
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is Calder Terrace actually used as a name for this area? #OsmAnd
2~ 1 year agocommentedCurlingMan13
♦53,468
It is according to USGS Topographic Maps
3~ 7 months agocommentedKinsio
♦266
That's taking data from the same source as the GNIS import, so that's to be expected. Not really an indication one way or the other.
4429596
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is Zummo still used as a name for this area? #OsmAnd
2~ 7 months agocommentedKinsio
♦266
"Currently exists: No" in Texas Almanac [1]. Do note, however, that this seems to refer to its existence as an *independent* entity, not necessarily as a neighborhood. [1] "Zummo", in Texas Almanac, Texas State Historical Association, accessed 27 Oct. 2025, <https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/zummo>, archived from the original on 23 Apr. 2024, <https://web.archive.org/web/20240423120324/https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/zummo>.
4429595
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is West Oakland still used as a name for this area? #OsmAnd
2~ 7 months agocommentedKinsio
♦266
"Currently exists: No" in Texas Almanac [1]. Do note, however, that this seems to refer to its existence as an *independent* entity, not necessarily as a neighborhood. [1] "West Oakland", in Texas Almanac, Texas State Historical Association, accessed 27 Oct. 2025, <https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/west-oakland>, archived from the original on 3 Oct. 2023, <https://web.archive.org/web/20231003071552/https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/west-oakland>.
4429594
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is Higgins still used as a name for this area? #OsmAnd
2~ 7 months agocommentedKinsio
♦266
"Currently exists: No" in Texas Almanac [1]. Do note, however, that this seems to refer to its existence as an *independent* entity, not necessarily as a neighborhood. [1] "Higgins", in Texas Almanac, Texas State Historical Association, accessed 27 Oct. 2025, <https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/higgins-0>, archived from the original on 22 Sept. 2023, <https://web.archive.org/web/20230922124242/https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/higgins-0>.
4429593
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is Helbig still used as a name for this area? #OsmAnd
2~ 7 months agocommentedKinsio
♦266
"Currently exists: No" in Texas Almanac [1]. Do note, however, that this seems to refer to its existence as an *independent* entity, not necessarily as a neighborhood. [1] R. Wooster, "Helbig", in Texas Almanac, Texas State Historical Association, accessed 27 Oct. 2025, <https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/helbig>, archived from the original on 13 July 2025, <https://web.archive.org/web/20250713225754/https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/helbig>.
4429604
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is Bor-ley Heights used as a name for this area? #OsmAnd
2~ 7 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Yes. Confirmed with a resident that it's used as a neighborhood name. Added check_date in changeset #173857207.
4429608
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is Walden still used as a name for this area? #OsmAnd
2~ 1 year agocommentedskquinn
♦5,445
According to https://www.texasalmanac.com/places/walden -- "Currently exists: No" but it may still be considered a locality or neighborhood name. Currently it is place=neighbourhood so it can likely be left in place.
3~ 7 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Honestly, thinking on this one, I think you could reasonably expect someone to know you mean this area if you say "Walden", so I'll close.
4380932
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Routing here recommended turning unnecessarily to keep going straight, check road tagging #OsmAnd
2~ 1 year agocommentedjhaluska80
♦3,277
The turn lanes looked correct. I have added turn restrictions to the intersection in case the router was confused about the links.
3~ 7 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Checked the routing graph in JOSM. Looks like that's what was needed, all good now.
43720191~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Physical separation on College Street isn't until after the intersection via StreetComplete_ee 58.2
2~ 7 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
Resolved in changeset #173736510.
5023000
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 7 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Is this road segment part of Church Loop or Mandavilla? Signage on the ground is unclear. via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 7 months agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
I checked the parcel map and it's Church Loop. I have updated it.
5022995
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 7 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing street: Coco Palms Lane. Name obtained via survey via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 7 months agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
Added.
5022988
Category: Unknown
1~ 7 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
These are two separate apartment complexes, so residential landuse area needs to be split up. Whoever takes care of this one, make sure to merge tags from and remove the node landuses for each complex when you do.
2~ 7 months agocommenteduser_5359
♦3,012
A separation of the landuse area https://www.osm.org/way/484631614 is only necessary if the names are to be entered. Can you draw in the dividing line? I could then carry out the separation, if you let me know.
4718097
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 1 year agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Part of this construction area is reopened; what are the boundaries now? #surveyme via StreetComplete_ee 60.3
2~ 1 year agocommentedKinsio
♦266
Looks like this area is reopened but there's now a different area closed off for pavement replacement
3~ 8 months agocommentedICT_maps
♦11,579
surely this is finished?
4~ 7 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
It is! And I actually updated the tags to reflect that with StreetComplete a few days ago in changeset #173344892.
5011282
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 7 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
three separate buildings via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 7 months agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
Updated.
4998678
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 8 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Apartment complex needs service ways added for better last-mile routing via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 7 months agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
Added.
4998652
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 8 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing service ways, adding would greatly improve last-meter routing to Panda Express via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 8 months agoclosedICT_maps
♦11,579
added
4963550
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 8 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing road via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 8 months agoclosedICT_maps
♦11,579
Added service road.
4963545
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 8 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing road via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 8 months agoclosedICT_maps
♦11,579
added track/land access connection.
4963544
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 8 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing road via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 8 months agoclosedICT_maps
♦11,579
added track/land access connection.
4963536
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 8 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing road via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 8 months agoclosedICT_maps
♦11,579
added track/land access connection.
4963535
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 8 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing road via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 8 months agoclosedICT_maps
♦11,579
added driveway
4961013
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 8 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing exit via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
4614417
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedskquinn
♦5,445
Building had address of 148, that probably actually belongs to a specific business in this shopping center. Needs resurvey
2~ 8 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
148 belongs to The Mail Room. I updated that POI at some point and this shopping center is pretty well surveyed at this point.
4948429
Category: EveryDoor
1~ 9 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
These are separate buildings with a covered walkway between them #EveryDoor
2~ 3 months agoclosedgpserror
♦12,441
updated to best i can figure out from available data...
4947068
Category: Unknown
1~ 9 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Both GNIS POIs need to be merged into church building polygon
2~ 9 months agoclosedbdentremont
♦2,349
consolidated the tags and added address and contact info for the church. https://www.osm.org/relation/19568240
4945512
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 9 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Slip lanes here need turn restrictions to prevent routing from one directly to another via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 8 months agoclosedjhaluska80
♦3,277
Reworked area to have better lanes and added a turn restrictions to prevent crossing the solid lines.
4892288
Category: unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
#surveyme What are the individual names, if any, of the Tommy Williams Technology & Education Buildings?
2~ 10 months agoclosedKinsio
♦266
3~ 10 months agoreopenedKinsio
♦266
4892289
Category: unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
building polygon and LIT boundaries need to be extended to cover extent of expanded Advanced Technology Center building (as of the writing of this note, visible on Esri World but not on Bing)
4872816
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 10 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Missing road via StreetComplete_ee 61.1
2~ 10 months agoclosedgpserror
♦12,441
added as private service road.
4867081
Category: unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
This is three separate buildings
2~ 4 months agocommentedICT_maps
♦11,579
addresses should also be on an apartment complex landuse, not reused
4863395
Category: unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
FYI to whoever draws the area, since it isn't super clear from aerials: westernmost bound of Huntington Park apartment complex is around here
4861717
Category: unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Road geometry incorrect here – separate ways should be merged into single way
2~ 10 months agoclosedHypsometric
♦4,452
Updated.
4805654
Category: unknown
1~ 11 months agoopenedKinsio
♦266
Main Street south of here becomes a dual carriageway, should be separated to reflect this