| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5481239 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 10 days ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "Who is allowed to park here? Parking may be free or paid." – Parking Lot – https://osm.org/way/712233234 via StreetComplete 63.4: Parking in front of the church seems to mostly be intentionally obstructed Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/367319.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 10 days ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | deleted parking | |
| 5481233 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 10 days ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "What’s the title of this information board?" – Information Board – https://osm.org/node/8492137186 via StreetComplete 63.4: It doesn't really have one clear title Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/367313.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/367314.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 10 days ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | done | |
| 5476497 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 13 days ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | I surveyed this location yesterday and couldn't find a bridge here. I was able to cross because I was wearing boots and the water wasn't that deep due to drought, but I also couldn't find the trail on the eastern side of the river. I took a detour via a more northbound bridge, which unexpectedly added a few kilometers to my hike. There has been a fixme on this path for quite a while indicating it might not exist. Should we remove the path? |
| 2 | ~ 13 days ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | yes I disabled the path and ford. Thx | |
| 5475292 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 14 days ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "What surface does this road have?" – Service Road – https://osm.org/way/1188790951 via StreetComplete 63.4: Seems to be on private property. Should this be on OSM to begin with? Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/366583.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 13 days ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property Wat kaarten voor de brandweer tonenInfrastructuur: Brandwegen, slagbomen en wandelpaden.Wateraanvoer: Nabijgelegen riviertjes, meertjes of brandputten voor bluswater.Obstakels: Onbegaanbare veengronden, steile hellingen en kwetsbare natuurzones. | |
| 5473413 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 14 days ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "Do you have to pay to park here?" – Street-side Parking – https://osm.org/way/366986378 via StreetComplete 63.4: Standard Belgian restrictions seem to apply Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/366372.jpg |
| 5469515 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "Do you need to pay to use this?" – Charging Station – https://osm.org/node/11093585733 via StreetComplete 63.4: Ze-mo no longer seems to exist Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/365800.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 17 days ago | commented | Jakka ♦34,588 | Ze-mo no longer seems to exist ? You cannot charge the bike anymore ? | |
| 3 | ~ 17 days ago | commented | SpinsterTux ♦36 | The website mentioned on the charger, www.ze-mo.be, appears to be defunct. The charger seemed to be in a bad state. I've never charged a bike or car before, so it's unclear to me whether the charger was still functional. | |
| 4 | ~ 17 days ago | commented | SpinsterTux ♦36 | The company shut down according to government records: https://kbopub.economie.fgov.be/kbopub/zoeknummerform.html?lang=en&nummer=844379951 | |
| 5 | ~ 17 days ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | I set it to disused | |
| 5438852 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | In context of overlay "Sidewalks" – Genkersteenweg [N75] (Primary Road) – https://osm.org/way/172208453 via StreetComplete 63.4: There is a separated two-way bike path here, but no dedicated infrastructure for pedestrians. They could use the bike path, but it's neither explicitly allowed nor explicitly forbidden. Is the current sidewalk designation correct? |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | bxl-forever_repair ♦595 | Your intuition is correct, there is a problem here. The real problem is that, in a StreetComplete edit last month you added sidewalk=separate on the road. This tag instructs navigation engines to no longer use the road… and not all of them will route pedestrians on a highway=cycleway without foot tags. In this case, the best option is to remove the restriction on the road. There is no suitable tag in the data model for those situations where access is not really allowed. Fixed. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Oops, sorry about that! Back then I must not have realized that a nearby bike path doesn't suffice for adding `sidewalk=separate`. Thanks for fixing! | |
| 5441049 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "Do you have to pay to park here?" – Parking De Zwaan (Parking Lot) – https://osm.org/way/749067606 via StreetComplete 63.4: The parking is for customers of De Zwaan |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | was reeds in database thx | |
| 5387415 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Path – https://osm.org/way/1429077621 via StreetComplete 63.2: There doesn't seem to be a connection between the two roads here Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/356137.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | een knip ;) thx | |
| 5383598 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "Is there a waste basket at this stop?" – Transit Platform – https://osm.org/way/245516095 via StreetComplete 63.2: StreetComplete is telling me there's a transit platform and a bus stop here. To be it just looks like a bus stop. What's the correct resolution? |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | bxl-forever_repair ♦595 | This is because there are multiple objects for a bus stop: one is the stop itself (the stop post), but the physical platform is mapped too. This is a known problem with StreetComplete. It is a very basic app, which is sometimes a bit "dumb" because it will consider those two objects to be two different bus stops and will ask the same question twice. I fixed this one. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | SIleno free | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | bxl-forever_repair ♦595 | @Silone free: Why did you reopen a closed note here? Is there anything you wanted or is it a new user’s mistake? | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | bxl-forever_repair ♦595 | Closing again. The issue has been solved, there is no obvious reason why this note should haunt the map forever. | |
| 5376972 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "What are the pickup times of this collection box?" – bpost (Mail Drop Box) – https://osm.org/node/4597899803 via StreetComplete 63.2: It's illegible Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/354736.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | done | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | reopened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | SpinsterTux ♦36 | It appears that BPost has an online tool where you can look them up, so I was able to add the correct hours. | |
| 5377092 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "How many steps are here?" – Steps – https://osm.org/way/1435042541 via StreetComplete 63.2: Hard to tell whether these qualify as two separate steps of stairs Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/354762.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | aangepast naar één trap. Niet evident deze visueel naar echt te benaderen. Op dit beeld komt daar nog een laag boven ? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2024990295005577 | |
| 5377044 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "What type of bicycle parking is this?" – Bicycle Parking – https://osm.org/node/677442353 via StreetComplete 63.2: I think none of the above Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/354752.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Jakka ♦34,588 | Is dit om fiets in te zetten met ringen voor slot ? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | ||
| 5377013 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – Outlet Hasselt (Clothing Store) – https://osm.org/way/196931256 via StreetComplete 63.2: It's called Bagl. Something food-related. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | correct info gevonden | |
| 5377009 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Mislabeled earlier. Appears to be part of El Sueño. via StreetComplete 63.2 |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | done | |
| 5376990 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "How many bicycles can be parked here?" – Bicycle Parking – https://osm.org/way/1426292722 via StreetComplete 63.2: There isn't a fixed amount of spots, people just park them wherever they can |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | OK dan geen aantal. | |
| 5373623 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "What’s the house number of this building?" – House – https://osm.org/way/835804030 via StreetComplete 63.2: 62A and 64 are completely adjacent. There's no other house number in between. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | LARA & Geopunt vermelden 62. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | reopened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Having compared Geopunt and Google Maps data, I can see a contradiction. Viewing from streetside, this is the order of the houses: 62, 62A, 64. So it appears that 62A and 62 have to be switched around. Any concerns about the proposed resolution? | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | done | |
| 5367448 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "Who is allowed to park here? Parking may be free or paid." – Parking Lot – https://osm.org/way/237400637 via StreetComplete 63.1: It's public parking with restrictions Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/353677.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | joost schouppe ♦4,503 | So you can only park if it's a Thursday and you have a special permit and you're under 3.5 ton? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | SpinsterTux ♦36 | My interpretation of the sign was that everyone can park there, except: - Motor traffic above 3.5 tonnes - Motor traffic without a permit between 1-8pm on Thursdays I don't know if my interpretation is correct though. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | joost schouppe ♦4,503 | That sounds plausible. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184971567 | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | reopened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | ||
| 6 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Just to be sure, `access=permit` combined with `access:conditional=yes @ (Th 13:00-20:00)` means the permit restriction only applies on Thursday afternoon, right? | |
| 7 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | joost schouppe ♦4,503 | Ah I misread your interpretation, sorry. That makes more sense of course: probably there's a market or some such at that time, when only folks with a special permit can park here. I just thought "this is weird" and didn't think it through. So yeah, that should become access=yes (or drop it entirely) and access:conditional=permit @ (Th 13:00-20:00) | |
| 8 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Ah, makes sense. I've updated the object accordingly. | |
| 5373603 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "How many steps are here?" – Steps – https://osm.org/way/576425745 via StreetComplete 63.2: There seem to be two separate flights of stairs on the map, while it's just one in reality Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/354368.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/354369.jpg |
| 5367457 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "What kind of parking is this?" – Parking Lot – https://osm.org/way/1429276551 via StreetComplete 63.1: Doesn't explicitly look like a parking lot to me |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | joost schouppe ♦4,503 | I agree. I'll remove it | |
| 5363542 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | In context of overlay "Surfaces" – Path – https://osm.org/way/982769555 via StreetComplete 63.1: This connection is planned, but does the path exist yet? To be verified on location and possibly removed from the map until built |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | SpinsterTux ♦36 | ||
| 5363689 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | I think this path is planned but not built yet. To be verified on location. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | SpinsterTux ♦36 | ||
| 5363372 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Path – https://osm.org/way/1435040764 via StreetComplete 63.1: Can't tell what this stretch of road is supposed to be from where I'm standing, descending from the bridge Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/353189.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/353190.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/353191.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Jakka ♦34,588 | nog wat beelden https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1797805107520630 | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | joost schouppe ♦4,503 | That path is just a representation of the way you can take a shortcut when following the cycleway, and how you can make your way to the steps. | |
| 5363365 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "Which direction leads upwards here?" – Steps – https://osm.org/way/1435040765 via StreetComplete 63.1: I'm confused about the shape of the stairs on the map Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/353187.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/353188.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Eebie ♦1,067 | De trap is gecorrigeerd op de map zodat iedereen de weg naar de brug kan vinden. | |
| 5363359 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "Is this road completed?" – Vildersstraat (Road Under Construction) – https://osm.org/way/218010287 via StreetComplete 63.1: There will be a modal filter between Elfde-Linie and Vildersstraat when the works are complete |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Eebie ♦1,067 | De nieuwe situatie in de Vildersstraat is op de kaart gezet, samen met de actuele situatie van de werken in de Elfde Liniestraat | |
| 5359858 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | In context of overlay "Sidewalks" – Heksenbergstraat (Minor / Unclassified Road) – https://osm.org/way/1532017675 via StreetComplete 63.1: To update: there's a modal filter in this segment blocking motor traffic |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | bxl-forever ♦5,947 | Can you please elaborate a little more about the "to update" request? As far as I can see, the road has been tagged with a strong access restriction since 2012: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1532017675, which bars through-traffic. And the eastern part of the street is a footway (which is de facto closed to motor vehicles), with a bollard in the middle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12290039991 This was added several months ago. Whereas only one single of those measures would prevent navigation engines from routing cars here, there are… 3 of them. That should be more than enough. Is there anything more here? On the latest aerial imagery, I do not see anything special on the location on the note pin. On this page you can find a collection of modal filters. Please tell us if there is one of them here. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Sorry, the situation was a bit ambiguous in StreetComplete. I didn't have the full picture there. Having reviewed the map via iD on desktop, there are two minor things: - There's a second set of green plastic bollards I didn't spot on the map yet, which I've added - I'm not completely sure why the eastmost segment is considered a path while the segment with bollards on both ends is considered a 'Minor / Unclassified Road'. I don't want to split hairs about it though, it probably doesn't impact the end user experience in any major way. | |
| 5358566 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | In context of overlay "Street lighting" – Cycle Path – https://osm.org/way/198361387 via StreetComplete 63.1: It's close to a lit road, but the path itself isn't lit. Should it be marked as lit or not? Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/352809.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | niamos ♦37 | I often wondered about this myself. I had a look around and found a discussion on the wiki but nothing conclusive: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:lit#Near_ambient_lighting | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | niamos ♦37 | Oops, I missed the relevant part of the wiki page: "yes = There are lights installed: [...] Lights do not need to be purpose-built to lit this specific object, for example footway lit by a billboard or nearby motorway still can be lit=yes." So I'd say its a 'yes' in your case. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Thanks for clarifying! I've edited the road accordingly. | |
| 5356898 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | In context of overlay "Bike paths" – Cycle Path – https://osm.org/way/755510515 via StreetComplete 63.1: Technically not a bike path but a road that prohibits car traffic, right? Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/352635.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Jakka ♦34,588 | correct. pas maar aan | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | SpinsterTux ♦36 | ||
| 5358584 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | In context of overlay "Bike paths" – Service Road – https://osm.org/way/34913450 via StreetComplete 63.1: It's a small service road that prohibits motorized traffic which doesn't have explicit permission. It is quite bike-friendly, but it doesn't have bike lanes like currently indicated on the map. It's also not explicitly designated as a bicycle boulevard. Is there a way to signal that this is road is optimized for bikers without incorrectly marking it as a bike path? Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/352811.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Eebie ♦1,067 | There is a road sign saying that it is a towpath (nl:Jaagpad). https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1497511308721266 . It is a service road that can be used by bicycles. Athough there were discussions about the correct way to tag it, tagging is now identical to the OSM wiki for tagging towpaths in Belgium: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Jaagpad | |
| 5351975 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | In context of overlay "Bike paths" – Turfstekersstraat (Track / Land-Access Road) – https://osm.org/way/1124680832 via StreetComplete 63.1: This road is for bikes only Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/352135.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Correction: bikes and locals | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Jakka ♦34,588 | Bikes ? C3 no vehicles exept locals ... | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | SpinsterTux ♦36 | My bad, see above correction. And for unclear reasons foot traffic seems to be forbidden as well, but there was a nearby walkway parallel to the canal. So road classification needs no edit, I'll update the "Allowed access " section in iD on desktop instead. | |
| 5350755 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | In context of overlay "Sidewalks" – Hadewychlaan (Residential Road) – https://osm.org/way/237415888 via StreetComplete 63.1: This no longer appears to be a road Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/352003.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | aangepast eens bekijken | |
| 5350723 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | In context of overlay "Bike paths" – Erasmuslaan (Residential Road) – https://osm.org/way/172210214 via StreetComplete 63.1: There's a short separated bike lane not displayed on the map Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/351998.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | klein doorsteekje erbij | |
| 5343580 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Path – https://osm.org/way/1354282357 via StreetComplete 63.1: This piece of road does not exist Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/351161.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | Correct, is een "noodzakelijke" virtuele verbinding om de knooppunten pad met fietspad te verbinden. Op je foto staat het paaltje. | |
| 5342175 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "What sport is played here?" – Sport Pitch – https://osm.org/way/1331730858 via StreetComplete 63.1: Property not accessible, can't tell |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | joost schouppe ♦4,503 | Aangeduid als privé. Op basis van de luchtfoto voor meerdere sporten geschikt | |
| 5342172 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SpinsterTux ♦36 | Unable to answer "What’s the house number of this building?" – House – https://osm.org/way/262492415 via StreetComplete 63.1: Can't see a house number from the street |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,588 | StreetComplete 63.1 reageert op elke codering van huis waar geen nr opstaat. Aan de grootte van gebouw lijkt op eerste zicht geen huis te kunnen zijn....Op geopunt staat gebouw er niet meer op zal het wissen. |