| Note | # | Tmstmp UTC | Event | Contributor | Comment | Auto-translation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4796589 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-09 04:34 | opened | Edthebikeguy ♦16 | Having this tagged as a bikeable section is flat out dangerous. To bike that, they must get into the far left lane of three fast moving and very busy lanes of traffic. I literally sat on my bike on an early Sunday morning for a long time and saw no possible way to safely bike it. | |
| 2 | 2025-08-05 18:32 | commented | chath_tsu ♦98 | I agree that biking on Airport Way would be a bad idea, but since there are no signage explicitly prohibiting bike it is by default legal according to Oregon law. Airport Way is tagged with RLIS:bicycle=caution_area and there are designated bike paths nearby which together should ddiscourage routing engines from routing onto Airport Way. | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-06 18:19 | commented | people128256 ♦128 | Edthebikeguy, which app did you use? | ||
| 4 | 2025-10-06 18:31 | commented | Edthebikeguy ♦16 | I use the Wandrer website. It is for walkers and bike riders that want a challenge to ride every road (trail etc) in a given area. And when you are committed to completing and they get their source from OSM, guess what? You get a bunch of people out there unsafely trying to ride this. There are more than 3,000 riders in Portland logging new miles in Portland based on what OSM is telling them us rideable. That is where I disagree with the whole "legal" vs dangerous debate. There is another section on Ross Island bridge that is even worse than this one that just got reverted back to bikeable even the to get to it you have to ride the bridge on the side that has no sidewalk or shoulders, no room for a bike on a lane with constant traffic going at freeway speeds. | ||
| 5 | 2025-10-06 18:55 | closed | people128256 ♦128 | Cannot reproduce with OSRM, and from my memory, not CoMaps either. This seems like a bug on their end and I'd report an issue to Wandrer. | ||
| 4796585 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-09 04:28 | opened | Edthebikeguy ♦16 | Marking this and many other roads in the Airport as bikeable is blatantly irresponsible. They built bike lanes and have frontage roads that parallel the main road in and out of the airportfor this reason. That main road is nothing short of a freeway with fast cars in multiple lanes. Then, you have the Departures road (and others) as bikeable roads. That's flat out dangerous. I just did it and was almost hit on multiple occasions. Bikes have no business on these roads. We might as well start marking freeways as bikeable if these are okay. The thing is, OSM feeds other systems that then tell bikers that these are roads they can/should do. They should not! Somebody is going to die. | |
| 2 | 2025-08-28 06:14 | closed | chath_tsu ♦98 | refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4796589: biking is not legally prohibited | ||
| 4726084 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-24 16:25 | opened | Edthebikeguy ♦16 | This road is private from this point on. It is gated and locked. | |
| 2 | 2025-04-24 18:03 | closed | people128256 ♦128 | done | ||
| 4704759 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-10 23:33 | opened | Edthebikeguy ♦16 | This section of trail doesn't exist. I have been on both ends and it isn't there. Can somebody put this as bike=No or whatever is required. | |
| 2 | 2025-04-12 11:40 | commented | dannmer ♦16,802 | The strava heat map shows bicyclist activity on this trail. Did it close recently? | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-12 11:42 | commented | dannmer ♦16,802 | There appears to be an unmapped trail running from the note location north to the parking lot | ||
| 4 | 2025-04-18 22:34 | closed | Edthebikeguy ♦16 | |||
| 4704764 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-10 23:43 | opened | Edthebikeguy ♦16 | This trail needs to end here so another biker doesn't accidently ride into a foot of water like I did because the lake is actually much larger half the year. The water forms a mossy green and it's not easy to tell that it is liquid and deeper than you think. | |
| 2 | 2025-04-24 16:09 | closed | people128256 ♦128 | done | ||
| 4582295 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-09 05:43 | opened | Edthebikeguy ♦16 | This T road has both ends too long on this map. Neither end is accessible further than where the road name on this map starts and ends. They are covered with blackberry bushes and it looks like they never extend those ends that far or they were abandoned years ago. Nobody can walk or ride that far. They are accessible only barely half the distance shown here. Google satellite shows them shorter too. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-13 00:34 | closed | tguen ♦1,352 |