OpenStreetMap Note Activities of 楊展博 for the last 12 Months
Overall Activities | 12 Months
Opened: 0 (0%) Commented: 1 (6%) Closed: 14 (88%) Reopened: 1 (6%)
Stats per month
Latest | Limit 250
Latest | Limit 250 | The colored events are made by 楊展博
Note#⏱️ Last updatedEventContributorComment
43166701~ 1 year agoopenedvectorial8192
♦1,305
Requesting to update GMB-NT 502 according to latest OSM road data
2~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
3~ 10 months agoreopenedvectorial8192
♦1,305
4~ 10 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,305
Not done yet; please don't resolve! (Also, there is not any GMB 502 mapped here; there is however GMB 503.)
5~ 10 months agocommented楊展博Ok
6~ 5 months agoclosedCypp0847
♦189
www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173607341
4741950
Category: unknown
1~ 11 months agoopenedvectorial8192
♦1,305
Chek Lap Kok Road: is standard highway but has no speed limit?
2~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
3~ 10 months agoreopenedvectorial8192
♦1,305
4~ 10 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,305
Please do not resolve notes without context; in fact it should be obvious there is a discussion going on here.
5~ 10 months agoclosedvectorial8192
♦1,305
Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166592241 ; closing.
40498571~ 2 years agoopenedPeter Newman
♦2,894
Unable to answer "How many cars can be charged here at the same time?" for https://osm.org/node/3494444748 via StreetComplete 55.1: Probably device rather than car charging
2~ 2 years agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,305
Agree with the mobile phone charging type. However, there currently seems to have no global consensus on how to tag *mobile phone* charging stations.
3~ 1 year agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,305
Update: it seems a new tag is available https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddevice_charging_station
4~ 1 year agocommentedPeter Newman
♦2,894
I should clarify from my "probably" I'm not sure I actually eyeballed this specific unit to check it either way, just noted it was inside an airport so probably wasn't car charging. Although from your "agree" did you actually look at it then @vectorial8192
5~ 1 year agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,305
I never physically looked at the irl situation, but "obviously" it is not EV charging Will have to leave this open until god knows when
6~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
7~ 10 months agoreopenedPeter Newman
♦2,894
8~ 10 months agocommentedPeter Newman
♦2,894
Hi @楊展博 could you be a bit clearer about why you've resolved the note. You don't seem to have touched the node. Is it actually for charging vehicles?
9~ 10 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,305
Guy was/is recently around resolving notes with no explanation.
4744567
Category: unknown
1~ 11 months agoopened---官方路牌警告有山泥傾瀉風險,仍可通過
2~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
3~ 10 months agoreopenedKovoschiz
♦2,187
21286911~ 6 years agoopened---不存在路徑
2~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
3~ 10 months agoreopenedKovoschiz
♦2,187
29008921~ 4 years agoopenedWhcohi
♦239
鏡蓉坑 / 龜禾石澗
2~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
4589612
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedLoha Lo千芋本铺
2~ 1 year agoclosedLoha Lo
3~ 1 year agoreopenedLoha Lo
4~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
15037051~ 7 years agoopened---免費停車位
2~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
31127711~ 4 years agoopenedivanbranco
♦12,536
to be fixed with natural=peak
2~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
3~ 10 months agoreopenedvectorial8192
♦1,305
4~ 10 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,305
Not done yet; please don't resolve!
5~ 7 months agoclosedkingkingHK
♦406
Resolved by someone else via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127477374 ; closing.
24340081~ 5 years agoopened---Dogistic Limited 一寵愛有限公司
2~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
3~ 10 months agoreopenedvectorial8192
♦1,305
4~ 10 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,305
Not done yet; please don't resolve!
5~ 7 months agocommentedkingkingHK
♦406
According to the Company Registry, a company with the same name has been dissolved in October 2020.
6~ 2 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,305
Then, it seems we may close this?
7~ 2 months agocommentedkingkingHK
♦406
Depends on your attitude towards closing notes without surveying. Although I know you might be leaning towards armchair-closing notes from previous discussions elsewhere, there are notes nearby that cannot be armchair-mapped e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5128521 , so if someone decides to visit there they can visit this place too to check if the named feature exists.
8~ 2 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,305
The armchair thought is, if the company is closed, then it can't possibly have any in-use features irl. What remains would be e.g. abandoned:building=yes Then, if we don't already have their info on OSM, then we might as well don't do it, and e.g. close the relevant notes. I rather add in-use features in urban areas than to add possibly abandoned features in extra rural areas.
9~ 1 month agocommentedkingkingHK
♦406
I mean, there's a chance the company that closed has nothing to do with the POI at this location and just coincidentally shares a name. Although this might be too unlikely.
4741653
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 11 months agoopenedSkylark_H_C
♦215
flyover #OsmAnd
2~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
3~ 10 months agoreopened楊展博
4~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
43197911~ 1 year agoopenedObanazawa Kuri
♦4,457
深圳大学罗湖校区 #OsmAnd
2~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
3~ 10 months agoreopenedObanazawa Kuri
♦4,457
4~ 3 months agoclosedbpaz709394
5~ 3 months agoreopenedkmpoppe
♦3,681
6~ 3 months agocommentedkmpoppe
♦3,681
This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4642899
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedvectorial8192
♦1,305
name:zh of building?
2~ 10 months agoclosed楊展博
3~ 10 months agoreopenedvectorial8192
♦1,305
4~ 10 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,305
Not done yet; please don't resolve!
5~ 10 months agoclosedWright One
♦173
Resolved in changeset 166806635