| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5299397 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Sri krishna PV ♦9 | sidewalk crosses building please suggest me to realign (51.5252265, -0.0783468) |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | harg ♦4,281 | I have adjusted the building outline to that shown on ESRI which seems to more closely match nearby highways. Also moved the fence to be between the parking area and the sidewalk. However, this is based on plausibility and ought to be checked by a survey to verify the reality. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Sri krishna PV ♦9 | Thanks for the alignment. | |
| 5299520 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Sri krishna PV ♦9 | please suggest me realign,For the latlog (51.5261393, -0.0674120) service road & building polygon. since we dont have to change the existing edits |
| 5299391 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Sri krishna PV ♦9 | According to Bing Streetside, sidewalks are present on both sides of the Rivington street segment. but segment not assigned as tunnel (51.52626936483716, -0.07910784564914444), I need clarification: should we assign tunnel=yes to the sidewalks?" |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | harg ♦4,281 | Sidewalks do go under the bridge: https://osm-harg.uk/hoxton/2026-08-23%2013.34.14.jpg so I've tagged them as tunnel. | |
| 5299379 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Sri krishna PV ♦9 | According to Bing Streetside, sidewalks are present on both sides of the Batemans Row segment(51.52532574742243, -0.0786779940932115). Since this road some portion of the segment are designated as a tunnel, I need clarification: should we also assign tunnel=yes to the sidewalks?" |
| 5296574 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Sri krishna PV ♦9 | According to Bing Streetside, sidewalks are present on both sides of Buckhurst st segment. the segment not assigned as Tunnel, need clarification: should we need assign tunnel=yes to the sidewalks?" |
| 5296462 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Sri krishna PV ♦9 | According to Bing Streetside, sidewalks are present on both sides of the Vallance road segment. Since this road some portion have tunnel, segment not assigned as Tunnel. segment need assign tunnel asper evidence. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Aethonatic ♦1,700 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188481042 | |
| 5296415 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Sri krishna PV ♦9 | According to Bing Streetside, sidewalks are present on both sides of Suttans way segment. Since this road some portion of the segment are designated as a tunnel, I need clarification: should we also assign tunnel=yes to the sidewalks?" |
| 5296383 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Sri krishna PV ♦9 | According to Bing Streetside, sidewalks are present on right side of the Lambs passage segment. Since this some portion of sidewalk passing though the tunnel , I need clarification: should we also assign tunnel=yes to the sidewalks?" |
| 5296310 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Sri krishna PV ♦9 | According to Bing Streetside, sidewalks are present on left side of the Chenies Mews segment(51.5229993, -0.1344473 ). Since this road some portion of the segment are designated as a tunnel, I need clarification: should we also assign tunnel=yes to the sidewalks?" |
| 2 | ~ 13 days ago | commented | spiregrain ♦2,400 | Why add separate sidewalks when the street can be tagged sidewalk:both=yes? | |
| 3 | ~ 13 days ago | commented | spiregrain ♦2,400 | Why add separate sidewalks when the street can be tagged sidewalk:both=yes? |