| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 121489 | 1 | ~ 12 years ago | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,376 | I'm guessing that what there actually is here apart from separate road, cycleway and footpath in the middle of a field is a road with a segregated cycleway on the southern side (perhaps cycleway=track; segregated=yes)? |
| 2 | ~ 11 years ago | commented | --- | Yes, but one has to cross the road at a blind bend to get to it when going west-east. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 years ago | commented | --- | What a bizarre piece of cycling infrastructure this is. | |
| 4 | ~ 11 years ago | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,376 | It's going to need a local to action the note (either fix OSM to be "more correct" or just close the note if things really are as bizarre as suggested above) | |
| 5 | ~ 10 years ago | commented | CrimsonCaribou ♦134 | Its a footpath by the side of the road which is segregated for cycles and pedestrians. I've removed the footpath and made the cycleway tagged as segregated. | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | closed | Taya_S | ||
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,376 | ||
| 8 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | lonerider543 ♦17 | Can this be closed? Seems it is mapped correctly now. https://i.ibb.co/HTcLYrHb/image-2026-05-11-211338918.png Could use some added detail on the positioning I guess, but it definitely is a segregated cycle path | |
| 9 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,376 | Yes, I think it can be closed. | |
| 5258780 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | Mex ♦8,021 | does this crossing exist? |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | lonerider543 ♦17 | Kind of.. more of an informal crossing. I have seen people use it before. Think it's from people crossing from the hospital to the road opposite where they park their cars. https://i.ibb.co/qFhxRtT5/image-2026-05-11-210316331.png | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | lonerider543 ♦17 | Worth noting there is a more formal crossing (more of a bit of pavement on the central reservation) slightly to the west near the administrative boundary (can see it on aerial view). Could be worth adding that one maybe? | |
| 4315502 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦8,379 | Is this a Premier store? https://www.premier-stores.co.uk/our-stores/whitwick-convenience-store |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | lonerider543 ♦17 | Yes it is. Added premier store | |
| 4106818 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | donq1986b ♦64 | Unable to answer "What type of stile is this?" – Stile – https://osm.org/node/1925250016 via StreetComplete 56.1: It's just a gate on both sides |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Mex ♦8,021 | are they passable? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | lonerider543 ♦17 | I have passed through here on 22/06/25, but don't remember the type of gate/stile. No issues getting through though | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | closed | Mex ♦8,021 | updated gate | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | lonerider543 ♦17 | ||
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | lonerider543 ♦17 | Just reopening again as I did another survey. No wonder I didn't remember the gates as they may as well not be in use anymore. Please see photos here: https://imgur.com/a/dPT2vVe I walked North to South so the photos are taken in that order. Not sure you want to amend any more on this @Mex as technically it is correct I guess but may not truly represent the area properly. If not feel free to just mark this resolved again and we'll just keep as is. | |
| 7 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | lonerider543 ♦17 | Will mark as resolved as no further feedback. The 2 gates are technically correct as per survey and don't think mapping in the other path would be very beneficial. | |
| 317024 | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,376 | Is there any sort of link between Bosworth Trail and Thornborough Road past here? there used to be http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27510797 , but that got deleted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27510797 . A proper survey is needed to see what the access restrictions are (and to see whether it is a public bridleway or similar). |
| 2 | ~ 11 years ago | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,376 | The footpath's been re-added in http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329010050 - still need to check access and designation though | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | closed | OsmZuzy | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,376 | ||
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | lonerider543 ♦17 | It's a public bridleway as per https://www.leicestershire.gov.uk/roads-and-travel/cycling-and-walking/where-to-walk-and-ride-in-leicestershire | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,376 | Alas that page says "Leicestershire County Council Copyright © 2025". However, if you've been there and seen the public footpath signs, you can add "designation=public_footpath". | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | lonerider543 ♦17 | Thank you for the advice. I will check for any signs next time I go! | |
| 8 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,376 | Thanks! | |
| 9 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | lonerider543 ♦17 | Here's what I found in today's survey: https://imgur.com/a/6C9bygk No clear signage stating it is a public footpath/bridleway - but with the waymarker I think it is hinting at it, unless that is enough confirmation. The cycle information sign also seems to suggest it is part of the national cycle network (route 52) ? What are your thoughts? | |
| 10 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,376 | Well that second sign definitely looks like a yellow public footpath sign, so "designation=public_footpath" would make sense, I think. It looks like there's also a "Mines, Mines and Railways" walking route relation that could be added too. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3748275 is an example of that sort of thing, although that's a regional ("network=rwn") rather than a local ("network=lwn") one. | |
| 11 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | lonerider543 ♦17 | Great thanks, I have added the public_footpath designation. I cannot find anything else about the mills, mines and railways walking route and cannot find an existing relation so will leave that out for now. | |
| 2626108 | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | opened | --- | LE67 4UY |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | lonerider543 ♦17 | Closing as unclear what this is for exactly. The post code in question applies to buildings further north along Warren Hills Road (around Bulls Head Pub). | |
| 3485380 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | aepunavy | Hi, I have modified the road class to cycle path based on internal driver feedback and OS Open Local 2022. Since I'm not aware of the barrier type, I have added barrier=yes. If any local mapper has information regarding the barrier at this place, please tag it accordingly or please let me know, I will make the edits. Thanks, aepunavy |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | lonerider543 ♦17 | There is no cycle path here. The barrier is a set of wooden bollards. The road is a private driveway from both sides, with the bollards in the middle to prevent people using the driveways as a through road. Edited accordingly. | |
| 4903314 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | lonerider543 ♦17 | Footpath currently not accessible from this point up to Beveridge Lane due to construction work. It's fenced off. Could not find alternative route. |
| 3794359 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | --- | Footpath is now fenced off here. To continue the route you need to walk up to bardon road and the turn right to rejoin |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | lonerider543 ♦17 | Duplicate of other note on same footpath | |
| 1261050 | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | opened | SK53 ♦3,858 | There is another building hereabouts: an education centre. |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | commented | Shires999 | There is a pre-school nursery located here | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | gnesss ♦284 | I've added the building which is now visible in aerial imagery but will leave this note as it's unclear whether it is an education centre, a pre-school nursery or something else. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | SK53 ♦3,858 | It looks to be this https://mini-explorers.com/ . We used the other car park for the Countryfile broadcast item, so didn't have a chance to look up here. Mind you we did a lot of hanging about for 2 seconds worth of filming! | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | lonerider543 ♦17 | can confirm this is mini explorers playschool as per sign on the building. will edit later as required when I get back home and resolve this note | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | lonerider543 ♦17 | if anyone wants to beat me to it: https://i.imgur.com/JVS2KmP.jpeg | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | lonerider543 ♦17 | added tags to the building | |
| 4324962 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | GIS Geoff ♦5 | Unable to answer "Is there a shelter at this stop?" – Stephenson Way (Bus Stop) – https://osm.org/node/562722630 via StreetComplete 58.1: Labeled bus stop not in use |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | lonerider543 ♦17 | no shelter, updated node accordingly | |
| 4324956 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | GIS Geoff ♦5 | Unable to answer "Is there a shelter at this stop?" – Stephenson Way (Bus Stop) – https://osm.org/node/562722636 via StreetComplete 58.1: Labeled Bus Stop Not in Use |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | lonerider543 ♦17 | no shelter, updated node accordingly | |
| 2275891 | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | opened | Talb's | Path currently blocked by network rail fencing, Local group working with planning office to re-open this path. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | lonerider543 ♦17 | Still blocked off and efforts still being made to try and get this reopened. Latest update from local MP: https://www.facebook.com/AmandaHackMP/posts/pfbid0JznGXQDf9Znuw1RAXUz9kSx21xNeRoqAoarFyvj8zEhnoRVCBFu4hpnCpzYqk4SWl |