| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4850961 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | hennzen ♦21 | Clearly no forest or vegetation here. via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/290067.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | prinshoek ♦2 | yeah that changed quite a few years ago... the southernmost part of the area still has some small trees and shrubs tho | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | prinshoek ♦2 | for now I have changed the outline of the area a bit so at least the obviously concrete tiles are not marked as forest anymore. I'll survey the location later on in this weekend. | |
| 4 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | prinshoek ♦2 | I looked, no trees to be found there, just grass. I reshaped the area and redesignated it to grass. I'd say that solves this. | |
| 4840969 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | hennzen ♦21 | Unable to answer "What is the widest gap one can pass through here?" – Bollard – https://osm.org/node/4934956079 via StreetComplete 61.1: Seems derelict to me. Would mark it as non existent, but not sure Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/288877.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | prinshoek ♦2 | to answer the question; the space inbetween is 1.7m. I don't think they're derelict cause they're obviosly meant to prevent people from entering with a vehicle. but yeah, is it useful to mark them?... meh | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | lyctkel ♦1,327 | I suggest abandoned:barrier=bollard (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:*) From my point of view this fits best. | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | hennzen ♦21 | Like "abandoned" prefix. And from reading the provided link I would opt for "disused" instead as one could put it back into operation without significant repair, I guess: > For features which might be returned to use without significant repair efforts, see the key prefix disused:*=* instead Would tag it as such and put 1.7m in the original issue. | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | lyctkel ♦1,327 | I wasn't quite sure myself which of the tags mentioned would fit better and decided on abandoned. disused is also OK. Please do it this way. | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | prinshoek ♦2 | this barrier still serves its intended purpose. I wouldn't qualify them as derelict, unused or abandoned. just mark them as the permanent bollards that they are and leave it at that. | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | prinshoek ♦2 | oh, wait... I see the picture now of a remnant of an old bollard. that bollard's function is replaced by new bollards placed at the beginning of the path, directly on the side of the crossing road. the old bollard remnant can indeed be considered non-existant. | |
| 8 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | lyctkel ♦1,327 | I have also just found it on Mapillary. Now we have 2 bollards or a row of bollards here, which I just entered. |