| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3329322 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | --- | Komoot thinks this is cyclable, which it isn’t. Can this be added? (Blackwall tunnel too?). Thanks! |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | closed | harg ♦3,746 | According to https://www.reddit.com/r/londoncycling/comments/84bj8g/why_nobody_cycles_through_the_rotherhithe_tunnel/ it's not good for cycling but not actually illegal. I note it's currently tagged foot=discouraged and will try adding the same for bicycle, but its not an official tag and I can't promise routers will understand it. | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | reopened | rskedgell ♦2,514 | ||
| 4 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | rskedgell ♦2,514 | It's been set more recently to bicycle=permissive, which is clearly wrong. It's not a revocable permission, but a right which would require a traffic order to extinguish. I'm not a huge fan of using discouraged when there's no sign, but I think it's probably the best option currently available. | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | 4004 ♦3,507 | retagged to discouraged for foot and bicycle. no idea where the horse access tags are from | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | Ratatapa | ||
| 7 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | rskedgell ♦2,514 | Thanks @4004. It's a pity we don't have an air quality tag analogous to smoothness=horrible which routers could use to assign an appropriately high cost to the tunnel. | |
| 8 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | harg ♦3,746 | Maybe suggest a new one: access=suicide :( | |
| 9 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | rskedgell ♦2,514 | It's not quite that bad, but I have walked through it once (and only once!) and emerged in Rotherhithe thoroughly kippered :-) | |
| 10 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | 4004 ♦3,507 | I'm sure bike routers already take into account if a route is on/next to a busy road. Plus I'd imagine the air isn't as bad during quieter hours. If there was a clear hazard, that could've been mapped. Closing this | |
| 11 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | Ratatapa | ||
| 12 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | 4004 ♦3,507 | ||
| 3678457 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | rskedgell ♦2,514 | Thames Path temporarily(?) fenced off here via StreetComplete 52.1 Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/147040.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | bedenski ♦6 | This has been fenced off for at least a year, if not two. Look at street view on google maps, then go back through the history. You'll see its been fenced off for some time. Given that, I'm certain this is a ruse by the building management to keep pedestrians off the thames path | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | rskedgell ♦2,514 | I've added the fence and set part of the path to disused:* in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135908282 I've also sent an email to LB Tower Hamlets street works team about the closure, which may help if it's covered by them. Otherwise, it's unlikely to be a PRoW, but there may be a planning condition about access. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | bedenski ♦6 | I guess the concern there is then there is no expectation that the path can/should be used? A non profit that tackles these issues is https://reclaimourriver.com/about-us/ but I don't think they've picked up on this section yet. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Andy__ ♦26 | Appears to still be fenced off. Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/233371.jpg | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | Ratatapa | ||
| 7 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | Ratatapa | ||
| 8 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | Ratatapa | O342 | |
| 9 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | rskedgell ♦2,514 | ||
| 10 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | rskedgell ♦2,514 | Hi @Ratatapa and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Notes in OSM are used for communication with other mappers. Closing notes without explanation, or adding cryptic comments, isn't entirely helpful here. If you could explain what you're trying to do here, hopefully someone will be able to help you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes | |
| 11 | ~ 1 day ago | commented | jayaddison ♦245 | Currently open again (not fenced off) Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/345805.jpg | |
| 12 | ~ 1 day ago | closed | jayaddison ♦245 | Fence removed in changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182918675 | |
| 4951623 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | Ratatapa | La Bigoderia barbershop |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | Ratatapa | https://osm.org/go/M5uTocPIA?layers=N¬e=4951623 | |
| 4950813 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | Ratatapa | 0134 |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | rskedgell ♦2,514 | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please could you explain what the significance of "0134" is, as without any context it may be hard for any other mappers to interpret. Thanks. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | rskedgell ♦2,514 | Without a response, there's nothing to do here. |