Note Activities of Viajero Perdido

Note	#	⏱️ Last updated	Event	Contributor	Comment
5411693 Category: Unknown	1	~ 20 days ago	opened	Viajero Perdido ♦451	This no longer connects to the north/south service road beside the highway. Source: survey. I wasted time in this new urban sprawl looking for a way to the highway. No dice. Unfortunately, I don't remember exactly where the barrier is.
	2	~ 20 days ago	commented	maxwellward ♦2,183	I've added a generic barrier node near the intersection of this road and the service road, but can you check and see if it roughly makes sense based on your memory? Even if it's not perfect. Thanks!
	3	~ 20 days ago	closed	Viajero Perdido ♦451	That's quite reasonable, and will help avoid future wasted time. Might've been there, might've been the other end, geez I'm getting old. Awesome quick reaction! Cheers.
5296437 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Geovelo_Notes	Erreur sur la carte suggested route uses stairs when there is an easy non-stair route nearby Photo·s et/ou informations disponibles ici: https://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/123743 (This note has been created from Geovelo)
	2	~ 2 months ago	commented	Geovelo_Notes	Un commentaire a été ajouté par un cycliste Geovelo : "In most cases that i've tried, the routing system goes through 88 Av NW and 109 Street NW. Or are you thinking of another easy non-stair route ? Thanks for your feedback,"
	3	~ 20 days ago	closed	Viajero Perdido ♦451	I can guess at the routing issue, and I know the area well. The likely stairs in question are mapped as such, so it appears there's nothing wrong with OSM data.
4623220 Category: unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	---	Jersey’s Cabinet Refinishing and Painting City: Edmonton Province: Alberta (AB) Postal Code: T6L 3Z1 Country: Canada Business Phone Number: 587-415-2746 Business Email Address: info@cabinetrefinishingedmonton.ca Website: https://cabinetrefinishingedmonton.ca/ Description: Jersey’s Cabinet Refinishing and Painting is the leading cabinet refinishing service in Edmonton, assisting both residential and commercial clients achieve the quality refinishing results for their space. We have services to meet your budget requirements, from repainting your cabinets to applying high quality Italian lacquer. The results will give you a fresh, revitalized space at a fraction of the cost to replace your cabinets entirely.
	2	~ 20 days ago	closed	Viajero Perdido ♦451	Sir, this is a gas station.
4982783 Category: Unknown	1	~ 10 months ago	opened	Lalalin	Marker was in wrong position
	2	~ 10 months ago	commented	PcMouse1 ♦258	Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. May you please specify what marker was in wrong position?
	3	~ 20 days ago	closed	Viajero Perdido ♦451	No answer.
4974042 Category: Unknown	1	~ 10 months ago	opened	Ewrt1 ♦41	Range Road 231 realignment underway
	2	~ 20 days ago	closed	Viajero Perdido ♦451	Done, by another mapper.
5411697 Category: Unknown	1	~ 20 days ago	opened	Viajero Perdido ♦451	Worth checking: Oldman (creek) vs Old Man (blvd), is one mis-spelt?
5373635 Category: Unknown	1	~ 1 month ago	opened	Viajero Perdido ♦451	Parallel trails mis-tagged, entire distance between nearest bridges. "Shoreline" trail is foot:yes, bicycle:yes, x-c ski NO, horse yes. "Inland" trail is foot:yes, bicycle:NO, x-c ski yes, horse NO. Definitely not bicycle: designated; that's the other trail. Source: survey today, ample signage wherever trails meet. All show walking icon pointing both ways, bicycle icon pointing to "shoreline" trail only, x-c ski icon pointing to "inland" trail only. Thus, the NO rules are implied. Horse signage is at the southern end (by pedestrian bridge) only, the signage looks older, and it might be obsolete. Unsure if horses still allowed this far north from the stables. Both trails are roughly same: 2m wide, gravel.
5306563 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Viajero Perdido ♦451	Should be bicycle=dismount (if not assumed for steps) or blank, for proper routing.
	2	~ 1 month ago	commented	deneben ♦28	Is there a bicycle ramp there? If so: bicycle=dismount ramp:bicycle=yes If not: bicycle=no
	3	~ 1 month ago	commented	Viajero Perdido ♦451	Yes, ramp on both sides. Survey. (I use this fairly often now because of construction nearby.)
	4	~ 1 month ago	closed	deneben ♦28	Thank you for reporting!
5322503 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Viajero Perdido ♦451	¿"Abajo"?
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	Hugoren Martinako ♦7,929	It looks OK, it's a "guanchism" (canarian word of aboriginal origin) https://guanchismos.ulpgc.es/item/11282
	3	~ 2 months ago	reopened	Viajero Perdido ♦451
	4	~ 2 months ago	closed	Viajero Perdido ♦451	Excellent and quick reply. Gracias.
887037	1	~ 9 years ago	opened	Viajero Perdido ♦451	This trail under the marker (Stick It Ridge) doesn't exist on the ground. It was recorded originally as a simple route, not as a real trail. In the meantime, a REAL trail has been built along this ridge, but I didn't manage to record a track log. Once somebody records and maps the real trail, this one should be removed. I can verify it doesn't exist, and the original mapper (who I discussed this with) agrees. The nearby trail mapped as "Danger" (because that's what it says on the sign) is part of the real trail, and should remain.
	2	~ 9 years ago	commented	rhaasdyk	We recorded the Sugar Daddy trail which should be pretty accurate now, but I didn't pay attention to how the Danger trail fits into things. So this could probably use one more review / comparison to a gps trace before resolving it.
	3	~ 9 years ago	commented	Viajero Perdido ♦451	Good job, thanks. I walked "Danger" from the north only as far as the turnoff to the viewpoint, and I think I saw where the same trail joined Sugar Daddy as I was walking along the latter, but I'm not 100% sure. (After finding off-trail geocaches farther south, somewhere around here I rejoined the new SD trail.)
	4	~ 5 months ago	commented	maxwellward ♦2,183	Hi, this note is now quite old, and looking at the recent Strava heatmap there is strong usage of "Sugar Daddy" and "Sugar Pony", but virtually no usage of "Danger". Additionally, Danger does not seem to connect back up to Sugar Daddy on the map, and a perfectly straight line seems unusual for a trail here. Would it be safe to assume this trail no longer exists, despite potentially existing 10 years ago?
	5	~ 5 months ago	commented	Viajero Perdido ♦451	Hi. I think "Danger" is/was a cutline, and there was a sign at the time with that word. But 9 years have passed, and I haven't been back recently. Do whatever seems reasonable. :)
	6	~ 5 months ago	closed	maxwellward ♦2,183	Thanks for the quick response! I think I'll remove it for now due to the lack of use, and that it's likely been taken back by the forest. Scary that 2017 was 9 years ago...
4579114 Category: LocusMap	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Viajero Perdido ♦451	Peak already mapped to the east, in a more believable location (per contours, antennas). #LocusMap
	2	~ 9 months ago	commented	Rodrigo Rega ♦2,467	This is mapped as "natural=volcano", not as peak. Should we delete it?
	3	~ 9 months ago	commented	Viajero Perdido ♦451	Don't know. Could depend on whether there's a local peak here. It looked to me like an error to see the same name in two places.
	4	~ 8 months ago	commented	ticho2 ♦283	One is peak (highest point), the other one is the second crater of the same volcano, as described at https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monumento_natural_de_la_Monta%C3%B1a_de_Guaza Seems correct to me the way it is now in the map.
	5	~ 3 months ago	closed	Hugoren Martinako ♦7,929	No se puede determinar dónde está el cráter (en la mayoría de los casos). De hecho, este volcán tiene dos cráteres. Bueno, no tiene ningún sentido añadir varios nodos de volcán con el mismo nombre (además, esa fue la razón por la que se creó esta nota).
4907035 Category: LocusMap	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	Viajero Perdido ♦451	"Smitty's" #LocusMap
	2	~ 8 months ago	closed	Joost- ♦13