| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5217215 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | I don't understand this bit of road. You can split away from JBLM to head towards the diamond interchange / overpass to the east--but you can also head towards this road by keeping left a few hundred feet before on the exit ramp-- is this in case of misdirected drivers who didn't realize they would be making a right into JBLM? Or something else? |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | It’s an “oopsie” lane, yup | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | There’s a good chance that the final build will not include this and the road split will occur closer to the intersection. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Ah, that's a little silly; good to know it's not a mistake in the diagram. I thought this was already constructed, no? Did I mark roads as opened prematurely? | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | This video accurately shows the final configuration: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lIDRY3j6DNI | |
| 6 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | (Which is still a work in progress) | |
| 7 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | okay. Looks like a mapper from Lyft ruther updated around this intersection. I don't have time at the moment to look into this more thoroughly--does what's mapped now look correct for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1491944461? | |
| 8 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | I’d say don’t worry about it. Everything is going to change after Memorial Day: https://wsdot.wa.gov/construction-planning/search-projects/i-5-mounts-rd-steilacoom-dupont-rd-corridor-improvements | |
| 9 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | awesome! | |
| 10 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Wsdot put a couple pics on Flickr showing final build. June 3 photos. Left lane continues straight to interchange, right 2 lanes go right onto JBLM. Paint is not final in picture, but at least the road pavement is shown mostly done. | |
| 11 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | Trod Skunk ♦24 | All looks good | |
| 5483400 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | All YTC roads should be marked as private EXCEPT for the public trail running through the north. Right now access is a mix of all types of restrictions. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Omnific ♦2,269 | Which is the public trail? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Palouse to Cascades State Park Trail (aka John Wayne Trail) | |
| 4 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,110 | Can anyone tell me why doris is listed as a trailhead? | |
| 5355356 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Flexibollards from here north to S 9th St prevent mid block left/u-turns. Either a ton of turn restrictions need added or the road needs to be split. |
| 5317048 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | This is 714 D, the three-bldg complex to the left is 714 A-C, though I can’t figure out which exactly is which (of the A-C). This whole block has the same address otherwise. |
| 5301903 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | The road bends here significantly. We probably should show it somehow. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,110 | okay, #fixed ? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Trod Skunk ♦24 | ||
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | reopened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | ||
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Maybe? https://flic.kr/p/2sbC1Xh | |
| 6 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | Looks pretty accurate to me! | |
| 5217225 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Where does this sidewalk go? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7073597907) WSDOT's rendering (https://wsdot.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2023-06/I-5SteilacoomDuPontRdJBLM-Stage3-Design-visualization-Atkinson.JPG) shows it continuing off to the west, but this is just a freeway ramp. Is the rendering wrong, or does it connect to some parking lot etc. to the west? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | It’s probably going on base | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Forgot link: https://flic.kr/p/2sbC4Jz | |
| 4 | ~ 25 days ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | So as of that photo, the crossing looks like it goes literally nowhere (as pedestrian infrastructure projects often end up, incomplete...) Do you know if a sidewalk has been constructed here since the time of that photo (since it looks like there was still pretty heavy construction at the time)? Thanks! | |
| 5064230 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | Slyman99 ♦5 | Road blocked, under construction till 1/28/26 #organicmaps android 2025.11.12-2-Google |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | Not really enough time left for us to update on the map. Now scheduled to reopen on March 12, 2026 | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | https://www.facebook.com/MadiganHealth/posts/update-as-of-jan-8-2026madigan-gate-i-5-exit-122a-was-closed-on-october-28-2025-/1302631185234639/ From adjacent note: Road from I5 and Madigan Gate closed. Road ends next to Shoppette | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Omnific ♦2,269 | Currently scheduled to reopen on March 30 | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | Trod Skunk ♦24 | ||
| 5232341 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Mapping out the pedestrian routing into and around the stadium is an awesome challenge I hope someone will take up. There are no official maps so this would require boots on the ground and aerial imagery. This would just be for public access, not anything behind locked doors. Or at the very least routing pedestrians up to the gates and drop a gate there and stop. There’s at least two entrances, one on north and one on south. |
| 5217244 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Is this freeway on-ramp (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472983843) signalized? This one doesn't have a crosswalk. |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Correct, no signal | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Okay. I wasn't sure because it looks like a stop line here in the WSDOT rendering. Thanks for confirming. | |
| 5217218 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Can road users heading west on the two-way road make a sharp right to head back east? |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Now that my edits are uploaded: that is, should there be a turn restriction marked on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13672578422 stating that westbound traffic must turn into JBLM? Or is that not the case? | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Apparently so, no restrictions | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Cool, thanks! | |
| 5144058 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | --- | Massive realignment of exit ramp and new bridge is open. WSDoT has details posted. |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | https://wsdot.wa.gov/construction-planning/search-projects/i-5-mounts-rd-steilacoom-dupont-rd-corridor-improvements | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Thanks for working on this. I did some more updates based on my understanding of this project (not personally familiar with this exit though). Can you check if they look good? Particularly, is the old overpass (at Clark and Barksdale) now north-north-west-bound traffic only? My understanding is that this bridge will be closed entirely soon, but for now it's still open to that direction? Let me know | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦16,225 | this illustration seems to describe it the best: https://wsdot.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2023-06/I-5SteilacoomDuPontRdJBLM-Stage3-Design-visualization-Atkinson.JPG | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Oh, that's a great rendering. Thanks for the link! But it sounds like there's still work to be done to get to that point? I was under the impression that Clark road overpass hasn't been removed yet and is still serving some traffic, but maybe I have outdated info. I have no on-the-ground experience here. | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Yes, it’s still in progress. Clark Rd bridge is still there. | |
| 7 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Cool. So when the highway=construction roads I mapped open, they can be replaced with the correct highway=* tag (e.g. the highway=construction + construction=motorway_link can be changed to highway=motorway_link) | |
| 8 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | According to WSDOT, the rest of the interchange will open this Saturday the 21st, weather-permitting, and the old bridge will close. Demolition of the old bridge is scheduled for April 3-4. | |
| 9 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Old bridge is now closed to all traffic. Diagrams showing the new complex traffic movements are here: https://engage.wsdot.wa.gov/i-5-mounts-to-steilacoom-dupont-rd/ Note that there’s both one-way and two-way sections of roadway mixed together including a two-way section paralleling a one-way section. Yikes! | |
| 10 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Can you now get on I-5 South from the diverging diamond? Is that ramp (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472983844) now open? | |
| 11 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Looks like it: https://engage.wsdot.wa.gov/i-5-mounts-to-steilacoom-dupont-rd/#:~:text=Before%20crossing,southbound%20I%2D5%20on%2Dramp | |
| 12 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | I've done some more edits for lane tagging and signals, etc. I think this area is in relatively good shape now, except for precise alignment which will need to be done with aerial imagery when it eventually comes out, and/or with some amount of GPS tracing (probably not). I'm looking forward to cleaning up the old bridge soon at the start of April! | |
| 5153683 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Needs connections between cart paths and service roads |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | Omnific ♦2,269 | Added | |
| 5150196 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Do these new roads have names? What about the new bridge? |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | It’s all a weird interchange with direction arrows. No names. Though that might change. So maybe this all is a giant set of Links and no Secondary? | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Hmm. I don't quite know the line between a link vs a road. Road classification in general is often fuzzy in OSM. But, considering the planned road network, I think this segment is kind of an extension of Clark Rd (from a network perspective, not a naming one), so it might make more sense as a highway=secondary. Though I agree that it is a bit awkward because heading eastbound on this segment you're forced to get on the I-5 North entrance. When this is all built out and the signs are up, it would probably be good to go through and clean up the destination=* tags and related. Especially in an interchange-like area (and especially when roads don't have names per se) I think that's very useful data for navigation etc. ("follow signs for I-5 north, seattle") Happy mapping! | |
| 5147713 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Is this a two-way road yet per its note=*? oneway=* was removed. Also, is highway=motorway_link most appropriate here? Is this seen as a continuation of both the on-ramp and the off-ramp? |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | This is a two-way road now. Plans show it bring split into two one-way roads | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Can you check what I've updated it to now? I think the WSDOT rendering shows a two-way and a one-way here. | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Wow! This is great! Need to move back the fence that’s crossing the roadway, and you’ve fixed all else! | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Thanks, I spent a while on it ☺️ Ah, I didn't realize that it had moved over there as well, good catch. | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Moved the fence. As far as I can see in the aerials, it ends shorter than previously. But it also looks like there's another wall, though I can't tell if that's just the edge of the road. | |
| 7 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | Trod Skunk ♦24 | We should just call it good. Thanks | |
| 5147709 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | What are the sidewalks like here, now that (I think) the off-ramp is closed here? |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,110 | not going to matter for much longer. all the exiting for 20 years bridges in this area of I-5 are scheduled for removal. the are to short and not wide enough for I-5 expansion. | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Yeah. I guess more generally all the sidewalks around here are going to need to be fixed. | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Yeah this is good enough for now | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | ||
| 5147710 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Is this road divided on-the ground? I feel like it's adding unnecessary complexity. |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Yes it’s physically divided. | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Okay, thanks! | |
| 5147717 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | What's the intersection geometry here? Can vehicles travel north on the overpass? Traveling east, do they go through the traffic calming islands before making a left onto the overpass? Can vehicles heading southbound on the overpass turn to the I-5 northeast-bound on-ramp? |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | The part of the secondary road (bridge) that is south of the traffic signal is one-way south. The part north of the traffic signal into the roundabout is two-way. | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | thanks! | |
| 5146374 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Constitution Drive should be marked private matching nearby private streets |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦16,225 | done | |
| 5141752 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | --- | Navigation island, should be private |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | no island here! | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | ||
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Note stated this is a private road. | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | It also states this is an island | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | Let me clarify - I was assuming "anonymous" was referring to a navigation island, as a geographic island found in water. Instead, you are correct, they should be referring to a "Traffic Island".... | |
| 7 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | Road was reconnected on the south end - looks like it became disconnected. I'm not seeing any signs or indication from street imagery that it is "private" here | |
| 8 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | This segment is not private. It is only private once you hit the military base further north of here. Access tags on all points north of where it crosses onto base were set. access=private private=military Because there is no access or signage until that point, this segment should not be marked private. Let me know if you disagree. https://www.alltrails.com/trail/us/washington/country-joe-s-to-nisqually-river-cliffs | |
| 9 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | I recommend you read the first comment on the all trails you posted. Also Thurston county public records has this marked as private property. | |
| 10 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Confirmed on Strava heatmap that this trail, while it may have been used in the past was closed off at least on the north end as it enters the woods. All trails description mentions a gate blocking access. | |
| 11 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | Trod Skunk ♦24 | ||
| 1429068 | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | opened | Jaku103 ♦633 | school speed 20 |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | commented | Bcarr91 ♦104 | Do you know when this school speed limit is active? | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Unfortunately when flashing is the correct answer here as there is no posted hours and school hours regularly change from year to year. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | Omnific ♦2,269 | Added when flashing | |
| 5141735 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | --- | Navigation islands |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | no island here | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | ||
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | I can clearly see a navigation island here and amongst all the others you closed. Example here, private on both sides and public in the middle. If you don’t know how to fix this, then leave it to someone else. | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | This is clearly a parking lot... I'm not sure where you're seeing a traffic island. Please identify where this clear navigation island is here and what imagery. | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | access tag updated | |
| 5141732 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | --- | Navigational island |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | no island here | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | ||
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | I can clearly see a navigation island here and amongst all the others you closed. Example here, private on both sides and public in the middle. If you don’t know how to fix this, then leave it to someone else. | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | fixed access tags here. Again, note was not clear | |
| 5141713 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | --- | Island in navigation |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | no island here | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | ||
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | I can clearly see a navigation island here and amongst all the others you closed. Example here, private on both sides and public in the middle. If you don’t know how to fix this, then leave it to someone else. | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | Again, I'm not sure what imagery you are looking at that "clearly" shows a navigation island here, but if you could provide where is at this note, that would be amazing. Seems I am not able to find it. | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | you mean access island. routing island. yeah, again, note is not correct. updated access accordingly. | |
| 5141712 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | --- | Island in navigation |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | no island here | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | ||
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | I can clearly see a navigation island here and amongst all the others you closed. Example here, private on both sides and public in the middle. If you don’t know how to fix this, then leave it to someone else. | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | I'm not sure what imagery you are looking at, but none available on ID are showing a traffic island. Please provide what source you are using... | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | you mean access island. routing island. yeah, again, note is not correct. updated access accordingly. |