| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3125097 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | Clivefromkent | Gate from road to public access land here leading to path that follows edge of wood. walked by me 5 months ago |
| 2 | ~ 8 days ago | closed | Tallguy ♦105 | Surveyed and updated | |
| 3125098 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | Clivefromkent | Stile here giving onto path heading South by South West to meet stile at other end of field |
| 2 | ~ 8 days ago | closed | Tallguy ♦105 | Surveyed and updated | |
| 3125099 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | Clivefromkent | Stile here |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Tallguy ♦105 | I've recently walked parts of this area, and in particular to the stile close to this marker. Either the marker is in the wrong place, or the stile is there. | |
| 3 | ~ 8 days ago | closed | Tallguy ♦105 | Surveyed and updated | |
| 3125101 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | Clivefromkent | Gate here, verified by self a couple of months ago |
| 2 | ~ 8 days ago | closed | Tallguy ♦105 | Gate added after visit to clarify the position | |
| 1803734 | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | opened | Jacob Peeling | "There is a dentist not far from here but it has a different name " The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground. POI name: Casey Dental Care POI types: amenity-dentist OSM data version: 2019-05-17T13:54:02Z #mapsme |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | commented | Tallguy ♦105 | #surveyme | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | Tallguy ♦105 | I can't find a 'Casey Dental Care' near here on OSM, so I assume it has been removed / changed. There is a dentist nearby which has a website which indicates it is there and correctly mapped. Closing this note. | |
| 2237405 | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | opened | Roy49 | This section of path is currently flooded (and signs notify that fact). Bexley PRW Team are aware and the Electricity company that own the field were originally going to resolve the issue, but then we all went into Lockdown. Temporary measure is to walk across the field. As an aside, the OS mapping indicates that the RoW turns up and over the hill! TBH that would make a pleasant alternative for the benefit of a viewpoint! |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | commented | harg ♦3,727 | Not being familiar with the area, I can't work out where "the hill" would be, but the path as mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32604306 seems to correspond to FP133 at https://www.bexley.gov.uk/sites/bexley-cms/files/2017-11/Definitive-map-for-South-of-borough.pdf and that probably takes legal precedence over what OS shows, unless and until Bexley ROW team can find historical evidence of a footpath where OS shows it. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | commented | motogs ♦36 | The hill is to the west of this point, NE of the substation. The fencing now skirts the flooded area. Current Bing imagery shows it well. I believe this is a PRoW and if so it's probably been legally diverted. I intend to check this out. Bexley online data is not definitive but should be more up-to-date than what OS shows. I've developed the OSM data in this area and have more to do. | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Tallguy ♦105 | Hi @motogs, I walked this path a couple of weeks ago. All seems to be correctly mapped according to 'ground truth'. Can this note be closed now? | |
| 5 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | motogs ♦36 | ||
| 6 | ~ 9 months ago | reopened | motogs ♦36 | ||
| 7 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | motogs ♦36 | Yeah, that's fine. I never did get round to checking it out further. Thanks for your survey and comments. I'll close it now. | |
| 4699904 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Evelyn Star ♦22 | Sign post via StreetComplete 60.3 |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | Tallguy ♦105 | Closing the note - author has edited the nearby sign post and there seems to be no need for this note. | |
| 4715249 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | You cannot cycle here |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | Tallguy ♦105 | Not sure exactly where this relates to - the marker is closest to the A20, London Road, which I have cycled along many times. There are no restrictions there. Closing note as cannot contact an anonymous author. | |
| 3472723 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | --- | This is private home and stable yard not a Business |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | harg ♦3,727 | Nothing in OSM mapping says it is a business. The three closest buildings are simply tagged "building=yes". But it is in an area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26272750/ currently described as farmland. Do you consider that to be incorrect, for any part of that outline? In particular, are there any normally-locked gates on the access road that could be mapped access=private? | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | Tallguy ♦105 | Closing - does not appear anything else is needed. Has been stagnant for years. |