| Note | # | Tmstmp UTC | Event | Contributor | Comment | Auto-translation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5097307 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-12-19 12:26 | opened | Larmax ♦364 | Library in the sea? | |
| 2 | 2025-12-27 18:21 | closed | SverigeFan ♦237 | The entry was asking to correct position itself - which I did and unified this double entry with the existing correct one, see https://vardo.arena.axiell.com/ | ||
| 2357927 | 1 | 2020-09-21 20:51 | opened | koerten | "Wrong location " The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground. POI name: Skyvillage Sweden SkyArk POI types: tourism-guest_house OSM data version: 2020-08-22T02:23:14Z #mapsme | |
| 2 | 2023-11-30 19:45 | commented | Fjellrev ♦1,789 | There are to huts named Skyvillage a bit furter south on the map, but the website mentioned on one of them is dead and nothing recent on their Facebook as well. Do they still exist at all? | ||
| 3 | 2025-12-27 18:21 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | After some searching on the internet I decided to remove that one point here but keep the note open: There are still *two* other entries for "Skyvillage" and from what I get from those old (< 2023) reports from tripadvisor etc. with shifting adresses the firm indeed, as Fjellrev questions, might have gone or shifted to another name and place with different offers - but I#m not sure either. So even with that one point deleted we have some more entries to validate - and I guess that will be difficult even when one is in the area. So the new task from this note is: Does Skyvillage/Skyark still exist at all and if so where? One mght check Kurravaaravägen 50, Vasikkaniemievägen 15 and Södra vägen 2... | ||
| 4 | 2025-12-27 20:05 | commented | Fjellrev ♦1,789 | Thanks for lifting this up and for doing some more checking. Did a little more myself now. Came over this website (Don't ask me how ;-) ) https://skysledtours.com/ which is situated at one of the addresses you mentioned. Checked it on allabolag.se - the boss was also the boss of SkyArk AB (the company behind Skyvillage) - this company was filed bankrupt in January 2025. No mentioning of the sky-village on the new companies website, so maybe this part of the business has ended (Even though the sign at the road still seems to exist...). Actually not a uncommon situation with these very active small-businesses far north. | ||
| 4920683 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-20 21:09 | opened | judisa ♦137 | Unable to answer "What sport is played here?" – Sport Pitch – https://osm.org/way/665703448 via StreetComplete 61.2: No sports field | |
| 2 | 2025-12-27 17:00 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | I can't validate that it is still a sports field, but Google found this official site: https://www.nordkapp.kommune.no/kamoeyvaer-grusbane.578397.no.html where "grus" should mean something like gravel. Unfortunetely the map doesn't work on that website. | ||
| 5061630 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-11-20 23:47 | opened | JT-Elki ♦19 | "The naming/spelling ‚Mehavn‘ is wrong - correct is ‚Mehamn‘" OSM snapshot date: 2024-05-28T17:19:44Z POI name: Mehavn kystfort POI types: historic-fort #organicmaps ios 2025.11.11-5-ios | |
| 2 | 2025-12-27 16:45 | closed | SverigeFan ♦237 | Spelling corrected. | ||
| 5020169 Category: --- | 1 | 2025-10-23 22:31 | opened | --- | onosm.org submitted note from a business: Name: Kautokeino Sport og Fritid addr:housenumber=8 addr:street=Bredbuktnesveien addr:city=Guovdageaidnu - Kautokeino addr:postcode=9522 Phone number: +47 91929520 Website: https://kautokeinosportogfritid.no/ Social Network: https://www.facebook.com/kautosportogfritid/ Opening Hours: mo-fr 10am to 5pm and saturday 10am to 4pm Wheelchair accessibility: yes Category: Sporting Goods Shops Accepted payment methods: Cash,Bank card,Mastercard,Visa,Apple Pay,Google Pay | |
| 2 | 2025-12-27 16:24 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | I checked the existence via the website and Instagram and added a waypoint for that shop. After looking into the website and Instagram I decided "Outdoor" might charakterize the shop better than the proposed "Sports" Anyone with better knowledge may add or correct. Open questions: Where exactly inside the house ist the shop located? Is the "Kafe Risku" still existing inside the building? I can't find it I keep the Note open until these questions are answered. | ||
| 2566784 | 1 | 2021-03-05 16:40 | opened | frspp ♦206 | Add ski touring | |
| 2 | 2023-10-27 20:44 | commented | Fjellrev ♦1,789 | There is nothing on the map on this position. Where were you thinking ski touring should be added? | ||
| 3 | 2023-11-21 08:14 | commented | frspp ♦206 | Various couloirs are used in ski touring/backcountry skiing. Yes, nothing visible in map so it is more like informal or/and winter only route. | ||
| 4 | 2025-12-26 21:17 | closed | SverigeFan ♦237 | (Some;-) One could map a skitour (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:piste:type) here if there are useful routes machting the criteria, even if nothing is visible on the ground or marked in the area. But because no one has picked up that hint for years I assume it irrelevant and will close it to reduce the cluttering of the map, | ||
| 4448381 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-09-23 08:56 | opened | Apirnus ♦2,231 | This path along with other paths are used by motorised vehicles (ATV) to access communication tower for service during off-winter time. Should the path then have some kind of tag for motorised vehicles access despite it being very rough terrain even for ATV to pass over? | |
| 2 | 2025-12-26 21:04 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | God question: My opionion without having seen what you describe: Since some quads can go nearly everywhere and what you describe ist not a public access but only a usage from some especially authorized local people I see no value in adding tags like foot=yes; atv=private while it still stays a path and doesn't widen to a track (>= 2m). | ||
| 3 | 2025-12-26 21:22 | commented | Apirnus ♦2,231 | I will add a bit more context. These paths are shared usage aka public path from Näköalatasanne toward two crosses and from there onward which just happen to lead to the radio tower and its service building. Being there on the top I could argue here that the path itself is pretty much public path. However, the path is definetly not >=2m wide and is just a one rocky path that just has been used so much that it resembles a path by basically working the ground in into a path. By the way, would you happen to know why there are two crosses on this mountain half way to the top? Just two crosses, made from metal bars, inserted between rock, without any signs or anything. | ||
| 4880013 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-28 14:47 | opened | SwissMapper573 ♦6 | Unable to answer "What’s the name of this place?" – Campground – https://osm.org/node/6684194085 via StreetComplete 61.2: Nothing suggests this is a campsite | |
| 2 | 2025-07-29 22:26 | commented | eisa01 ♦1,054 | Looks to be for tents only: https://www.midttroms-friluftsrad.no/lokalt/tilrettelagte-friluftsomrader | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-30 19:52 | commented | Fjellrev ♦1,789 | As I understand it in the link the tentplaces are situated on the other side of the road. From the aerials I would guess between the parking and Geitskarelva. | ||
| 4 | 2025-07-30 19:55 | commented | Fjellrev ♦1,789 | Read it more carefully now: Seems to be tentspots on this side as well (maybe more "official" on the other side) | ||
| 5 | 2025-12-26 20:44 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | I added some tags, even the link eisa01 provided, which might help to clarify that this site ("below" the street) is not an "usual commercial camping site", but simply a place where you can set up a tent, maybe even under the § 9 of the "Outdoor Recreation Act" if you came by bike or on foot. As far as I remember - I've been there before - cars are not allowed in the dunes on this side of the road, so no caravans or motorhomes down there. Feel free to correct and add: OSM IMHO lacks a explicit tag for "backcountry tent sites" with no infrastructure (besides a simple toilet?) or even formal designation. That brings us back to SwissMapper573: The site now has a name with a link to ist dedication as "fritidsområde", and despite the comments contain a lot of information someone might close the note after some time now? | ||
| 5017016 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-21 20:44 | opened | --- | Bjerkvik Camping is missing | |
| 2 | 2025-12-26 19:38 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | I reduced the size of the mapped wood from Norge Orthofoto since a construction area can be seen here, but no chance to map the campsite from the aerials yet, although you can find some fotos scattered over the internet. | ||
| 3 | 2025-12-26 19:44 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | Campsite on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bjerkvikcamping | ||
| 4955366 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-10 09:42 | opened | --- | Skålvold | |
| 2 | 2025-12-26 19:17 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | Norgeskart definitely states Skålvoll with a "L" and not a "D" at the end - https://norgeskart.no/#!?project=norgeskart&layers=1001&zoom=16&lat=7513246.89&lon=495272.93 So are there more valid sources or what else does the comment imply? | ||
| 4910279 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-14 20:27 | opened | Oli Sennhauser ♦104 | Here ist a was missing via StreetComplete 61.2 | |
| 2 | 2025-12-26 18:44 | closed | SverigeFan ♦237 | Added missing part of track/service road. | ||
| 5056756 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-17 12:50 | opened | --- | LA1N Narvik gruppen av NRRL | The Narvik group of NRRL |
| 2 | 2025-11-18 20:33 | commented | Fjellrev ♦1,789 | https://la1n.no/ | ||
| 3 | 2025-12-26 18:25 | closed | SverigeFan ♦237 | Added tags to building and checked information against website - thanks to Fjellrev for that link! | ||
| 5105832 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-12-26 15:59 | opened | Jnrf ♦137 | Lekande flickor Britta Nehrman, Gøteborg, SCULPS Gave 1966 fra David Hummel, Gäddede via StreetComplete 62.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/321642.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-12-26 18:02 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | I added most of your information as tags into the osm database. Normaly I would shut the hint imidiately afterwards. But in this case the link to the image would no longer be accessible, since links to images in StreetComplete become inacessible when the hint is closed. On the other hand hintsin OSM are no normal information tht can stay forever. Can you plese load you Photo to wikimedia or panoramax or another service where it can be permanently referenced via an image= <url> tag inside OSM? Otherwise it will get lost if the hint is closen some day... | ||
| 4809916 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-06-17 11:57 | opened | JadeHimitsu ♦1 | "10 Kroner for 2 minutes" OSM snapshot date: 2025-04-18T15:38:17Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-shower #organicmaps ios | |
| 2 | 2025-12-26 17:19 | closed | SverigeFan ♦237 | Check from other source (P4N) and added tag fee= Note resolved. | ||
| 5073540 Category: CoMaps | 1 | 2025-11-30 12:08 | opened | niikoo ♦6 | "New website: https://www.avinor.no/flyplass/mosjoen/" OSM snapshot date: 2025-11-04T05:32:27Z POI name: Mosjøen lufthavn POI types: aeroway-aerodrome-international #CoMaps android 2025.11.25-4-FDroid | |
| 2 | 2025-12-26 17:04 | closed | SverigeFan ♦237 | Checked url and corrected OSM database. Note can therefore be closed. | ||
| 4851069 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-12 10:44 | opened | --- | Tømmerneset leirsted | The Tømmernes Campsite |
| 2 | 2025-12-26 16:50 | closed | SverigeFan ♦237 | Added that name and tags to the correct building nearby via the address reference of the appropiate website and linked that website and some contact infonmation to the facility. Feel free to improve that tagging. Nevertheless the hint can be closed. | ||
| 4741504 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-04 11:53 | opened | UliFR ♦1,867 | Supposedly there is a shelter and a toilet here somewhere. | |
| 2 | 2025-12-24 14:21 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | 200 m south of this point both are mapped - does "supposedly" mean there are more or is this note just a bit off? | ||
| 3 | 2025-12-24 16:06 | closed | UliFR ♦1,867 | At the time I did not find the shelter/toilet in the aerial image, hence 'supposedly'. There are buildings in the area 200m south in the ortofotos. I've moved the nodes to those buildings now. Thanks for commenting! | ||
| 5081661 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-12-07 00:36 | opened | judisa ♦137 | Alta helsebad via StreetComplete 62.0 | |
| 2 | 2025-12-16 16:53 | closed | SverigeFan ♦237 | Added bath as point with some information from their website. More refinement (what type of bath?) , better placement inside the building and amenities as a sauna might be fine - but what the note said is mapped now, therefore I close it. | ||
| 5081659 Category: LocusMap | 1 | 2025-12-07 00:26 | opened | SverigeFan ♦237 | Track to lake and turning circle / P #LocusMap | |
| 2 | 2025-12-07 11:21 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | Now mapped. | ||
| 3 | 2025-12-07 11:21 | closed | SverigeFan ♦237 | |||
| 4986525 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-01 11:12 | opened | falcius ♦386 | Parken auf dem Seitenstreifen. Das Tagging als Parkplatzwege scheint mir hierfür unpassend. via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/308113.jpg | Park on the hard shoulder. The tagging as parking lanes seems unsuitable to me for this purpose. |
| 2 | 2025-11-23 17:53 | commented | wielandb ♦4,208 | Hab die Tags mal so angepasst, dass es der Beschilderung vor Ort entspricht. | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-23 20:55 | closed | wielandb ♦4,208 | |||
| 4 | 2025-11-25 22:51 | reopened | SverigeFan ♦237 | |||
| 5 | 2025-11-25 23:13 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | Ich habe mir die Stelle heute angeschaut und dann auch mal nach den passenden Tagging-Regeln recherchiert: Das Tagging hinsichtlich des durch das Schild eingeschränkten Parkens ist mit restrictions=no_parking ja gut zu erfassen. Was mir, und IMHO auch dem Ersteller des Hinweises, falcius, aber primär nicht gefällt, ist die Charakterisierung der Parkfläche als Erschliessungsstraße: Da wird nichts erschlossen, der Seitenstreifen *ist* die Parkfläche - und man kann die Fläche, da zugeparkt, nicht längs durchfahren. M.E. ist das klar eine Parkfläche vom Typ street_side mit Parkrichtung parallel, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Street_parking#Unterscheidung_zwischen_Parken_auf_der_Stra%C3%9Fe_(lane)_und_Parken_im_Seitenraum_(street_side). Wie als Regelfall vorgeschlagen an die benachbarte Fahrspur würde ich das aber *hier* in dem komplexen Verkehrsraum mit Busspur etc. nicht anhängen wollen, sondern lieber eine *separate Parkfläche* kartieren und diese entsprechend taggen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Street_parking#Separat_gemappte_Parkpl%C3%A4tze_im_Stra%C3%9Fenraum. Und "layby" würde ich nach der Lektüre dieser https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dlayby#Difference_with_street-side_parking Seite zugunsten street_side verwerfen. Ich hatte das alles in Josm schon fertig eingetragen bevor ich beim Hochladen gesehen habe, dass der Hinweise nun geschlossen, aber der Erschließungsweg noch drin ist. Da ich keinen "edit war" lostreten will habe ich nun erstmal diesen Hinweis reaktiviert und stelle meinen Vorschlag mit der separaten Parkfläche im Seitenstreifen zur Diskussion. Grüße, Rolf | ||
| 6 | 2025-12-10 07:05 | commented | CADdog63 ♦330 | Für mich ist highway=service keine Erschließungsstraße sondern ein Zufahrtsweg und eine Parkfläche ist es ja eigentlich wegen des Parkverbotes gerade nicht. Aber mir ist das egal, solange die Fläche mit der Straße verbunden wird | ||
| 4797121 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-09 11:22 | opened | Arnd ♦127 | Unable to answer "Is there a crossing here?" – https://osm.org/node/1390822338 via StreetComplete 61.1: Verstehe die Frage nicht. Klar kann hier über die Straße gehen | Don't understand the question. Of course you can walk across the street here. |
| 2 | 2025-11-22 11:14 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | Die Frage zielt darauf, ob es einen Zebrastreifen oder sonstigen (z.B. ampelgeregelten) Fussgängerüberweg gibt. ->https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing Kann ich aus den mir zugänglichen Luftbildern grade leider nicht beantworten. | ||
| 4545923 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-07 11:07 | opened | SverigeFan ♦237 | While mapping in my chair > 2000 km south: In the aerials of MMI there is a (boarded?) footpath visible here connecting the path SE of this point with the path to the kota NW.. As the path is missing at the northwestern end the boards may have rotten or being deliberately removed. This needs local knowledge or inspection on the ground. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-24 06:28 | commented | Globeflower ♦24 | Hello. I have visited this area several times. There used to be a path from "Viiankijärvi kota" to "Laavu" (the path under this note), but it fell into disrepair and was officially shut down. The path you added, going east of "Viiankijärvi kota" to the viewpoint, is not visible on-site. Most of it can still be seen on satellite images because those sections were not removed, whereas the start of the path was (possibly to discourage use). This means the path under this note is no longer accessible. (And is in poor condition). The path heading south from "Viiankijärvi kota" eventually splits into two routes: one leading north to the parking lot and another heading south to this same "Laavu." The latter path was also previously closed due to poor condition, but it was reconstructed and completed around September 2024. I added this path in changeset #157145540. I didn’t extend the path going past "Laavu" as far as you did, because that section doesn’t appear on the MML topographic map. This probably means it's a part of the old, abandoned route. I plan to revisit these locations once the snow has melted. | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-24 15:53 | commented | SverigeFan ♦237 | Hi, thanks for your effort and clarification - I feared that I couldn't trust the aerials in this case. How do we go on? Do you wish me to revert all my additions or would you prefer to correct what you find ist not existing or usable in the real world? Maybe wait until the snow has melted (in May?) ? Greetings from Erfurt, Germany without any snow in my region :-( | ||
| 4 | 2025-01-25 10:59 | commented | lankapuhelin ♦1,304 | Throwing in my 2 cents: the tag trail_visibility is very useful in cases such as here. Old/partially removed/deprecated paths that are no longer very easy to see can be tagged with matching values, and different values are also rendered on the map. Check the wiki for more info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-26 01:59 | closed | Globeflower ♦24 | It’s not a footpath but rather duckboards (pitkospuut) built mostly over a swamp with some wooded sections. Since it’s damaged, it could be dangerous or impractical to use. However, the path might still be very visible. In my opinion. I think the path going north of "Laavu" that SverigeFan extended can remain for now, as there is likely a warning sign or other information indicating if continuing further is dangerous. It also seems like it's not blocked deliberately. However, I believe the short path heading east of "Viiankijärvi kota" to the viewpoint should be removed, as atleast the start is nonexistent. Even the sections visible on satellite imagery are uncertain whether they still function as a usable path. A visit is possible probably in the end of May, depending on flood levels. SverigeFan, that’s a shame. We just got more snow, but the temperatures are quite high :P | ||
| 6 | 2025-01-26 02:00 | reopened | Globeflower ♦24 | |||
| 7 | 2025-01-26 02:01 | commented | Globeflower ♦24 | Didin't mean to resolve yet. | ||
| 8 | 2025-01-26 12:36 | commented | lankapuhelin ♦1,304 | OSM is supposed to represent what is factually present on the ground, so if duckboards in bad condition exist, I think they should be mapped. They exist in various conditions around the country anyway, most are not in perfect condition. My 2 cents, other opinions welcome. | ||
| 9 | 2025-01-26 16:14 | closed | Globeflower ♦24 | That’s true as well. Then I guess it depends on whether the duckboards can still be used as a path. Since I don’t have this information (yet), I will personally leave these sections as they are for now. I was planning to remove the start of the path next to the kota, as I know it doesn’t exist, but the MML satellite map isn’t loading in ID or JOSM at the moment. Others are welcome to handle this as well. | ||
| 10 | 2025-01-26 16:15 | reopened | Globeflower ♦24 | |||
| 11 | 2025-01-26 16:17 | commented | Globeflower ♦24 | I keep pressing the wrong button, apologies. | ||
| 12 | 2025-01-26 20:41 | commented | lankapuhelin ♦1,304 | This might be useful too, check the road example: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:* | ||
| 13 | 2025-01-31 09:24 | commented | Globeflower ♦24 | I removed the nonexistent start, added abandoned=yes, edited some tags. I split the abandoned path next to laavu from the official one, added abandoned=yes, edited some tags | ||
| 14 | 2025-01-31 11:01 | closed | SverigeFan ♦237 | 👌 |