OSM note activities of ti-lo for the last 12 months
Copyright © Pascal Neis | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors | More? See ResultMaps | Notes overview worldwide | Autoreload 5:00 min
Overall activities (12 months)
Opened: 150 (51%) Commented: 108 (36%) Closed: 18 (6%) Reopened: 20 (7%)
Stats per month
Latest activities
Latest activities | The colored events are made by ti-lo | Limit 500
Note#Tmstmp UTCEventContributorCommentAuto-translation
4978153
Category: Unknown		12025-09-25 00:22openedti-lo
♦618		"Verbesserung" würde so aussehen : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160958758/history , https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:indoor"Improvement" would look like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160958758/history, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:indoor
4978152
Category: Unknown		12025-09-25 00:18openedti-lo
♦618		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12065296437/history sollte ein Raum/area sein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:indoorIt should be a room/area https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:indoor
22025-10-04 17:43commentedMetzor
♦187		Das sehe ich anders: indoor=yes wird immer noch als Synonym für location=indoor verwendet.
357129712023-02-23 12:16openedti-lo
♦618		Is the faculty just an office or the whole building ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:campus
22023-03-05 11:12commentedseichter
♦63		weder noch Das Gebäude ist der Hauptsitz der Fakultät Informatik inkl. Dekanat, enthält aber auch zwei große Hörsäle, die auch von den anderen Fakultäten genutzt werden.
32023-03-05 16:06commentedti-lo
♦618		Eben erst bemerkt, dass das Gebäude sogar sehr detailliert erfasst ist : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3954354 --> dann sollte man das "office" als "weg" an die richtige Stelle platzieren ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2001139174
42025-09-25 00:16commentedti-lo
♦618		Eine Menge "indoor" ohne indoor erfasst https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:indoor
52025-09-25 09:14commentedseichter
♦63		Die Erfassung erfolgte einige Jahre vor dem Wiki-Eintrag für indoor (englisch: 2015, deutsch 2021). Entstand nach dem damaligen Stand von simple indoor mapping.
4978146
Category: Unknown		12025-09-25 00:03openedti-lo
♦618		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11763083943/history room ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:indoor
22025-11-14 19:52closedwindharp
♦524		Ja, die steht im Parkhaus drin. Hab schon mal ne Weile gesucht :-)
32025-11-14 19:52reopenedwindharp
♦524
4978145
Category: Unknown		12025-09-25 00:01openedti-lo
♦618		Should be an area https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1916649709/history Any shop here ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:indoor%3Dshop
4978143
Category: Unknown		12025-09-24 23:53openedti-lo
♦618		Sollte auffindbar sein https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553738165/historyShould be findable https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553738165/history
4978140
Category: Unknown		12025-09-24 23:46openedti-lo
♦618		Sollte auffindbar sein https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553679864/historyShould be findable https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553679864/history
4978139
Category: Unknown		12025-09-24 23:45openedti-lo
♦618		Sollte auffindbar sein https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553679867/historyShould be findable https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553679867/history
4978138
Category: Unknown		12025-09-24 23:39openedti-lo
♦618		Auffindbarkeit https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553620797/historyFindability https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553620797/history
4978137
Category: Unknown		12025-09-24 23:38openedti-lo
♦618		Der hat Öffnungszeiten ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553620797/historyDoes it have opening hours?
4978136
Category: Unknown		12025-09-24 23:37openedti-lo
♦618		Sollte auffindbar sein https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553700036/historyShould be findable https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553700036/history
4769893
Category: unknown		12025-05-21 16:53openedti-lo
♦618		Should have a 16 km diameter https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2086007526
22025-09-18 05:47closedGeeMaps!
♦2,769		Not mappable
32025-09-18 06:01reopenedti-lo
♦618
42025-09-18 06:02commentedti-lo
♦618		Why not ? Here's a 20km example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063229590
52025-09-18 06:49commentedGeeMaps!
♦2,769		Please feel free to map it in that case!
62025-09-18 21:57commentedti-lo
♦618		Sure, if I'd know the exact dimensions. There's even no name
201202912019-11-29 17:59openedti-lo
♦618		Probably a rental shop with different vehicles offered ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ashop%3Drental
22025-09-18 09:03closedwowstacie
♦136
32025-09-18 21:55reopenedti-lo
♦618
42025-09-18 21:55commentedti-lo
♦618		Still not clear what it offers https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5017258325
4519844
Category: StreetComplete		12024-11-14 17:41openedwindharp
♦524		Neu gebaute Mehrfamilienhäuser via StreetComplete 59.3
22024-11-16 15:16commentedwindharp
♦524		Benachbartes Haus angepasst, die hier fehlen in den Luftbildern noch.
32025-09-13 16:52commentedti-lo
♦618		Umrisse eingezeichnet
42025-09-18 15:19commentedwindharp
♦524		Adressen ergänzt, kann dann wohl zu
52025-09-18 17:02commentedti-lo
♦618		Hatte neulich gesehen dass die in der Mitte verbunden sind (anders als auf dem Luftbild)
62025-09-18 17:03commentedti-lo
♦618		Muss nochmal genau nachsehen
4966767
Category: Unknown		12025-09-18 00:39openedti-lo
♦618		No building visible on satellite picture, should be an area https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11333732252
4850975
Category: unknown		12025-07-12 07:35opened---Momentan besteht die Spreuerhofstraße aus 3 einzelnen Linien. Sollte man diese Linien zu einer einzigen Kombinieren?Currently, Spreuerhofstraße consists of 3 individual lines. Should these lines be combined into one?
22025-08-14 16:21commentedchris2map
♦748		Das wäre nicht zwingend nötig, ist hier aber auch gar nicht möglich: Der schmale Abschnitt hat andere Attribute wie der Rest.
32025-09-13 17:18commentedti-lo
♦618		Macht der einzelne Knoten hier Sinn ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3686416098
42025-09-14 12:27commentedlimes11
♦8,498		Da tourism=attraction bereits am way hängt, kann der Knoten weg. Zudem ist hier zum Teil bicycle/horse=no erfasst - Gibt es dafür Beschilderungen ? Dann wäre hw=footway die bessere Wahl.
52025-09-15 03:41commentedti-lo
♦618		Wie kommst Du auf den schmalen Pfad ? ;-) https://www.dieweltenbummler.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Spreuerhofstra%C3%9Fe-in-Reutlingen.jpg width=0.31 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/417619920 macht es selbst Leuten mit nur leichtem Übergewicht unmöglich, das als footway zu verwenden. Geschweige denn Pferde oder Fahrräder. highway=building_gap käme in etwa hin ;-)
4961908
Category: Unknown		12025-09-14 15:21openedti-lo
♦618		What is monitored ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12245904870 , see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=weather%3A
22025-09-14 15:23commentedti-lo
♦618		And https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=monitoring:
4961837
Category: Unknown		12025-09-14 14:50openedti-lo
♦618		Shouldn't be a node only https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2086015938/history, looks something like this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sudbury_Basin_Non-Ferrous_Metals_-_Eastern_Canada_map.png
347252112022-12-09 22:09openedDarkTranquility
♦173		Unable to answer "What kind of building is this?" for https://osm.org/way/52872777 via StreetComplete 49.2: Dieses Haus und das Haus in dem daneben Ernstings Family ist, sind ein großes Haus
22025-03-13 19:07commentedtjum
♦528		Stimmt... kann ich aber am Handy auch nicht schnell ändern.
32025-03-14 09:35commentedtjum
♦528		Jetzt fällt mir erst auf, dass das zwei Hausnummern sind und die "zwei" Häuser wahrscheinlich deswegen getrennt eingezeichnet wurden. Außerdem sieht die Rückseite seltsam aus. Da muss nochmal jemand hinten nachschauen, insbesondere welche Hausnummern am Treppenhaus dranstehen. Ich lass es jetzt doch mal vorerst, wie es ist.
42025-09-07 10:38commentedtjum
♦528		Ok... - es ist nur ein Gebäude - es hat zwei Hausnummern am selben Eingang - Den Haken zum Haus 13/1 gibt es nicht Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/303735.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/303736.jpg
52025-09-13 17:49commentedti-lo
♦618		Theoretisch sollte das hier abrufbar sein, habe aber das download-Menü nicht gefunden. Per email angefragt https://www.lgl-bw.de/Produkte/Liegenschaftskataster/Hausumringe Reutlingen verlinkt dazu nur auf Landesdaten https://www.reutlingen.de/geoportal/Open-Data, allerdings gibt es scheinbar vereinzelt engagierte Mitarbeiter : https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Sachgebiet%20GIS%20-%20Stadt%20Reutlingen
4944771
Category: CoMaps		12025-09-03 12:01openedanc25
♦2		"previous office ceased to exist" OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-22T03:20:49Z POI name: Linksjugend ['solid] Reutlingen POI types: office internet_access-wlan #CoMaps android
22025-09-13 17:13commentedti-lo
♦618		Nehme an, den Kommentar kann man schliessen ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7434714570/history
32025-10-12 18:28closedmap per
♦5,064		@anc25: Danke für die Änderung in OpenStreetMap!
4784784
Category: unknown		12025-06-01 09:13opened---Sportplatz (Indoor)Indoor sports field
22025-09-13 17:06closedti-lo
♦618		Eher ein Fitnesscenter https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4091248025
4694978
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:37openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
22025-08-18 11:14commentedwaterced
♦3,810		This one seems valid, right ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dmodel_runway
32025-08-19 12:00commentedti-lo
♦618		Depends. If you understand "valid" as "traditionally used", yes https://taghistory.raifer.tech/?#***/aeroway/model_runway. But it doesn't make sense to "invent" (another) way of tagging for every vehicle type, so it would be better to keep things such as *:*=runway (or *:*=launchpad). Which may be achieved using a namespace https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway
4854362
Category: unknown		12025-07-14 00:53openedTourism_info
♦103		Where are Launch Complex-0. Launch Complex-1 ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiki_Multi-Purpose_Aerospace_Park
22025-08-18 15:53commentedti-lo
♦618		Here's 0 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910751415 1 isn't mapped yet. But where's the spaceport area, the whole aerodrome ? https://hokkaidospaceport.com/en/facilities/
32025-08-18 16:00commentedti-lo
♦618		It seems they eye an expansion https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/firefly-aerospace-eyes-japan-rocket-launches-asia-market-2025-08-18/
4911509
Category: unknown		12025-08-15 15:19openedti-lo
♦618		Is this here ? https://africanspaceagency.org/contact-us/
22025-10-27 21:07closedNadaSharaby
♦503
381784312023-08-05 13:41opened---no information found about any "spaceport" plans
22025-08-12 16:45commentedti-lo
♦618		Apparently this site https://turdef.com/article/roketsan-establishes-mini-satellite-launch-facility
32025-08-12 16:47commentedti-lo
♦618		Infrastructure still missing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414427251
4676674
Category: unknown		12025-03-22 19:45openedti-lo
♦618		Unclear which kind of infrastructure, aeroway:uav=launchpad ? Should not only be a node, but an area https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3Auav
22025-03-22 19:47commentedti-lo
♦618		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12183946356
32025-03-30 23:30commentedti-lo
♦618		Syntax updated https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3Auav , but the area is still unclear
42025-08-05 15:33closedmaps4junkies
♦100
52025-08-05 22:10reopenedti-lo
♦618
62025-08-05 22:11commentedti-lo
♦618		As of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1410717288, seems to be aeroway:drone https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Drones,_UAV
72025-08-06 11:30closedmaps4junkies
♦100		Thank you.
4892195
Category: unknown		12025-08-04 16:30openedti-lo
♦618		Is there anything launched ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12999689983 otherwise, I'd recommend tower:type=rocket_engine_test + https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/industrial=rocket_engine_test for the pad
4888499
Category: unknown		12025-08-02 14:10openedti-lo
♦618		The website looks as if it's paragliding https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asport%3Dparagliding https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7682394
22025-08-02 17:39closedti-lo
♦618		Adjusted https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3Aparagliding
4888893
Category: unknown		12025-08-02 17:13openedti-lo
♦618		What happens here ? Takeoff / landing ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhanggliding
4887559
Category: unknown		12025-08-01 22:33openedti-lo
♦618		I doubt there's anything launched here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/989246921/history
22025-08-02 04:25commented❤️‍🔥
♦3,539		The LINZ Topo maps still include this feature (https://osm.org/node/1225232066/history/1 ) despite this recent news article: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/534909/plans-to-build-rocket-launchpads-at-kaitorete-spit-fail-to-get-off-the-ground maybe it's just disused:* ?
32025-08-02 10:17commentedti-lo
♦618		Yes, at least disused "Her statement did not mention rocket launches", but there seems to be a runway instead of a launch pad ? https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/525932/plans-for-spaceport-at-kaitorete-spit-in-strife-as-government-rejects-further-funding
42025-08-02 11:54commented❤️‍🔥
♦3,539		yeah.... maybe the future plans have no connection to this disused patch of asphalt from over 14 years ago?
52025-08-02 12:48commentedti-lo
♦618		The you should rename and possibly re-shape it https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/989246921/history/1 --> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Drunway
62025-08-03 09:25closed❤️‍🔥
♦3,539		👍 done
4887560
Category: unknown		12025-08-01 22:35openedti-lo
♦618		Could someone please verify whether this belongs to Andoya Spaceport ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372369263/history
4775309
Category: unknown		12025-05-25 19:49openedti-lo
♦618		Unclear why there's one "relation" which could be a closed line https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834314800 and then a second identical one with a "hole" for "PNMCC" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757096806
22025-08-01 02:24commentedO Fim
♦2,730		?????? como se mapeia
32025-08-01 14:08commentedti-lo
♦618		I assume this one may be deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834314800 but don't understand what this should be : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757096806 (doesn't look like a part of a crater, such as an island or inner rim). There are some examples here : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:geological%3Dmeteor_crater#Why_and_when_to_use_a_multipolygon
42025-10-21 18:48closeddanctc
♦6,186
4755428
Category: unknown		12025-05-12 15:33openedti-lo
♦618		There's a description for "balloon tagging" : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4683400091/history
22025-07-27 05:41closedmont1
♦46
32025-07-28 09:58reopenedti-lo
♦618		Please check the fixme. Seems this isn't used any more : A partir de fin octobre 2019 les vols ne seront plus effectués depuis l’Ariège et la Haute-Garonne. Les décollages auront lieu dans le secteur d’Eauze (Bas-Armagnac)
42025-07-30 10:47commentedK12230LF
♦16,396		So this needs to be removed ?
52025-07-31 13:53commentedti-lo
♦618		I think so, as long as it isn't "le secteur d’Eauze (Bas-Armagnac)"
4873343
Category: unknown		12025-07-24 17:21openedti-lo
♦618		Wo ist das genau ? https://neura-robotics.com/neura-electronics/Where is that exactly ? https://neura-robotics.com/neura-electronics/
4755434
Category: unknown		12025-05-12 15:36openedti-lo
♦618		There's a description for "balloon tagging" : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278364435
22025-07-23 09:18closedAlexSpritze
♦1,581		Okay, this way is already `aeroway=balloon`. Is it enough already?
32025-07-23 14:14reopenedti-lo
♦618
42025-07-23 14:15commentedti-lo
♦618		Which kind of balloon aeroway ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3Aballoon
4870217
Category: unknown		12025-07-22 18:11openedti-lo
♦618		The airport is mapped twice : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/999212029/history , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29483207
22025-07-22 19:09closedHypsometric
♦3,744		They are different airports with the same name. Both are mapped correctly. See ADIP: https://adip.faa.gov/agis/public/#/simpleAirportMap/7B9 https://adip.faa.gov/agis/public/#/simpleAirportMap/EFD
4694935
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:27openedti-lo
♦618		Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#ModelleIt was never "discussed out" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, but there would be a new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Models
22025-05-30 00:52commentedIm Fokus
♦1,909		Tu dir keinn Zwang an
32025-07-20 00:25commentedIm Fokus
♦1,909		Was spricht denn gegen 'model_runway' in Analogie zu 'runway' für die Verkehrsflugzeuge? Dass 'Aerodrome' bedeutender klingt?
42025-07-21 14:43commentedti-lo
♦618		Ich nehme an, Du sprichst davon, das als Wert und nicht als suffix auszudrücken, dass es sich um "model" handelt ? 1) Als suffix ist das filtern (hier : nach allen "modell-relevanten") einfacher, gleiches gilt für andere "Verkehrsmittel". 2) Keine neuen Werte (pro "Verkehrsmittel") erfinden, sondern die "angestammten" weiter verwenden. Also hier *=runway aeroway:model_aerodrome könnte im suffix natürlich auch nur "model", "aeromodeling" o.ä. heissen, "model_aerodrome" ist aber derzeit der "etabierte" Ausdruck
52025-07-21 21:21commentedIm Fokus
♦1,909		danke zunächst mal für Deinen Beitrag. Was mich irritiert ist, dass Du mehrfach von "suffix" unter Bezugnahme auf "model" schreibst, da dieser Wortbestandteil in "model_runway" oder "model_aerodrome" ja als Praefix fungiert. Mit Filterung hab' ich allerdings nichts am Hut, insofern soll's mir recht sein, wenn Du wegen besserer Suchergebnisse auf einen der bisher weniger benutzten Schlüsselwerte wechselst. Wolltest Du Dir mit diesem Hinweis einen Überblick über die Akzeptanz einer solchen Aktion verschaffen? Bisher hat außer mir leider niemand reagiert (was leider häufig passiert)
62025-07-22 14:07commentedti-lo
♦618		Ganz genau, wollte die Auseinandersetzung mit dem Thema in der "Praxis" erreichen anstatt über Theoretiker-Runden. Mein Hauptinteresse sind die "anderen Verkehrsmittel". Dort wurde die Differenzierung notwendig aufgrund der Verwendung z.B. von aeroway=launchpad für Ballons, Hobby- oder Forschungsraketen
72025-07-22 14:13commentedti-lo
♦618		Beim WERT spricht man nicht von "prefix/suffix", Bsp. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/aeroway=model_runway, nur beim "Schlüssel" (die Angaben vor dem =) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namespace
82025-07-24 21:52commentedIm Fokus
♦1,909		Na, dann toi, toi, toi, dass sich noch ein paar Leute hier äußern.
4694928
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:25openedti-lo
♦618		Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#ModelleIt was never "discussed out" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, but there would be a new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Models
22025-06-27 09:38commentedmcliquid
♦8,095		Wie würde man diese Notiz lösen können?
32025-06-27 10:35commentedti-lo
♦618		Indem man https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1333207568 umbenennt in aeroway:model_aerodrome=runway, z.B.. Daher auch der Link auf den Namensraum https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle (damit man auch die anderen sieht)
42025-06-27 10:51commentedmcliquid
♦8,095		Das verlinkte Proposal wurde nie akzeptiert. Das bisherige "aeroway=model_runway" hat 753 Nutzungen gegenüber nur 18 Nutzungen bei aeroway:model_aerodrome=runway. Somit hat das bisherige Tagging-Schema die fast 42-fache Nutzung. Der aeroway:-Namespace ist für reguläre Luftfahrtinfrastruktur reserviert. Die Einführung von Modellflugplätzen innerhalb dieses Schemas wirkt künstlich und inkonsistent. Und wenn man einmal aeroway:model_* akzeptiert, müsste man ggf. auch railway:model_*, waterway:model_*, etc. einführen. Das führt zu einer Fragmentierung der Struktur. Wieso sollte man das deutlich etabliertere Tagging gegen ein nicht akzeptiertes Proposal austauschen?
52025-06-27 10:58commentedti-lo
♦618		Wie gesagt, der Link auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway sollte eigentlich verdeutlichen, warum aeroway:*=* Sinn machen würde. Die "Millionen Fliegen können nicht irren"-Argumentation hat mir noch nie eingeleuchtet. Ebenso wie das herumreiten auf proposals. An dem Beispiel sieht man mal wieder, was dabei heraus kommt. "Der Rest der Welt" wird einfach ausgeblendet.
62025-06-27 11:59commentedmcliquid
♦8,095		Ich verstehe deinen Punkt, dass Nutzungszahlen allein nicht alles sind und dass Innovation manchmal außerhalb formeller Proposals entsteht. Trotzdem ist es wichtig, innerhalb der OSM-Community möglichst konsistente und nachvollziehbare Strukturen zu fördern. Der aeroway:-Namensraum ist bislang primär für reale Luftfahrtinfrastruktur vorgesehen. Wenn wir nun modellbezogene Objekte in denselben Namensraum verschieben, ohne dass dafür ein klarer Konsens besteht, riskieren wir semantische Unklarheiten – insbesondere für Datenverbraucher, die keine Trennung zwischen realer und modellhafter Infrastruktur erwarten. Vielleicht wäre es sinnvoll, das Thema nochmal im Forum oder auf der Tagging-Mailingliste aufzugreifen, um eine breitere Diskussion anzustoßen? Möchtest du die Notiz etwa so lange offen lassen, bis wie durch ein Wunder ein Konsens zustande kommt?
72025-06-27 12:57commentedTourism_info
♦103		Ich dachte eher an "mit den Füssen abstimmen". Aber bring's ruhig im Forum an, bin gespannt ob etwas konstruktives dabei heraus kommt. Bei Fahrzeugwerten jedenfalls nicht, und das seit einer Dekade
82025-06-27 13:14closedmcliquid
♦8,095		Dann stimme ich mit den Füßen ab 😉
403229312023-12-18 04:20openedti-lo
♦618		"300' diameter concrete launch pad located just west of our massive runway that may be utilized for vertical take-offs and landings" (not found on ID satellite picture) https://www.faa.gov/space/spaceports_by_state#ok_os https://airspaceportok.com/
22025-06-24 11:56commentedcuzi
♦5,549		It is visible on aerial imagery now
32025-06-24 13:07closedti-lo
♦618		Added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1409210239
42025-06-30 22:57reopenedkurazraree
52025-06-30 22:57closedkurazraree
4809292
Category: unknown		12025-06-16 20:13openedti-lo
♦618		dish and observatory should be separate ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687150977
4809284
Category: unknown		12025-06-16 20:01openedti-lo
♦618		Probably the telescope ? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/telescope%3Atype, there's already an "observatory" : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148682566
357137712023-02-23 13:15openedti-lo
♦618		Alice-Salomon-Haus https://www.swp.de/lokales/reutlingen/studieren-in-reutlingen-neues-studierendenwohnheim_-so-sieht-das-alice-salomon-haus-von-innen-aus-69257395.html building=dormitory https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:campus (Umrisse unklar)
22024-08-01 19:35commentedwindharp
♦524		Gezeichnet habe ich es nun, Wegführung auch, Details zum Haus fehlen
32025-06-09 16:25closedwindharp
♦524
42025-06-10 18:16reopenedti-lo
♦618
52025-06-10 18:16closedti-lo
♦618		Details ergänzt
387828012023-09-08 20:48opened---This part of Krämerstrasse should be marked too narrow for long trucks with trailers because of parking cars.
22024-11-25 15:41commentedsöm4324
♦3,274		Ist die Straße mittels Schildern für solche LKW gesperrt? Oder ist die Durchfahrtsbreite bekannt? Dann könnte man das eintragen, onst nicht.
32025-05-29 15:22commentedti-lo
♦618		Hier die Beschilderung Stand 2018 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.493132699971994&lng=9.216489499972113&z=19.9&pKey=501220084645031&focus=photo. Durchfahrtsbreite ist selbst für einen PKW + entgegen kommendes Fahrrad zu knapp
42025-05-29 15:30commentedti-lo
♦618		Ups, in der Strasse verrutscht. Hier die richtige : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.4950216&lng=9.2166648999722&z=17.013419051928082&pKey=512341146454348&focus=photo
52025-06-01 19:15commentedsöm4324
♦3,274		Danke, dann sagt die Beschilderung nichts über eine Einfahrtsbeschränkung aus. Dann könnte ev. nur noch die Breite der Fahrbahn zwischen den Markierungen gemessen und eingetragen werden (maxwidth:physical)
62025-06-01 20:44commentedti-lo
♦618		So würde ich die aktuelle Beschreibung nicht interpretieren. Bei einem temporären Parkverbot wäre ja durchaus Platz für einen Schwertransport https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxwidth:physical
72025-06-02 05:52commentedsöm4324
♦3,274		Welche Möglichkeit gäbe es noch, die (normalerweise) schmale Durchfahrt für LKW zu markieren?
82025-06-02 14:49commentedti-lo
♦618		Ich würde das als lane:width bezeichnen, scheint aber derzeit nicht vorgesehen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:lanes#Enge_Stra%C3%9Fen. Für cycleway allerdings in Verwendung https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=lane%3Awidth
92025-06-25 07:12commentedsöm4324
♦3,274		Hab die Frage mal ins Forum gegeben: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/einggeschrankte-durchfahrtsbreite-fur-lkw/131851/1
4779639
Category: unknown		12025-05-28 16:44openedti-lo
♦618		deprecated tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358802485/history, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Anatural%3Dcrater
22025-05-28 16:44commentedti-lo
♦618		there are "some" more in the vicinity https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/252m
32025-05-31 18:26commentedOddlyAngled
♦427		there are duplicates too - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358802485 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1280139946 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Valley_Caldera has details on this area
42025-06-01 22:03commentedti-lo
♦618		IMHO both should be replaced by an area https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CalderaRelief_large.png and tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dvolcanic_caldera_rim
52025-06-01 22:14commentedti-lo
♦618		Respectively https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:volcano:type%3Dlava_dome (for the "inner ring"
4689700
Category: unknown		12025-03-31 03:45openedti-lo
♦618		Is this a tethered balloon at the edge of the station ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7161118322 >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:balloon:launch%3Dmonitoring
22025-06-01 14:28commentedos-emmer
♦523		The aerial imagery is unclear. Dou you have additional information about the situation or are you requesting local survey?
32025-06-01 20:56commentedti-lo
♦618		Other knowledge of the situation (what is measured with which kind of balloon in which height) would also be fine. The original entry just says "Weather Station Balloon Launch Site" - could be tethered or a launch up to the stratosphere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aballoon%3Alaunch%3Dmonitoring#Examples
376864812023-07-06 23:42openedCheggrvomneggrHaupteingang ist ebenerdig. Nebeneingang hat ein Stufe >7cm höhe, die ja aber nicht benutzt werden muss. Zwei Rollstuhlplätz. Der in Kino 1 zu schräg >8% und für große Rollis zu klein. Man kann nicht drehen. Kino 4 wird noch getestet!
22025-05-29 15:15closedti-lo
♦618		Cheggrvomneggr auf die bestehenden Einträge https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49591794/history und Wheelmap-Option hingewiesen https://wheelmap.org/way/49591794
356623312023-02-19 21:47opened---Psychiatrie / Klinik
22025-05-28 17:20closedti-lo
♦618		Updated https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91911848/history
4769695
Category: unknown		12025-05-21 14:07openedti-lo
♦618		Name is missing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological=meteor_crater
22025-05-21 15:58commentedti-lo
♦618		7 names, to be precise https://umap.openstreetmap.de/en/map/meteor-craters_94040#17/52.49030/16.89507
32025-05-25 19:51closedti-lo
♦618		remapped
4769818
Category: unknown		12025-05-21 15:55openedti-lo
♦618		According to wikipedia, the elevation is "1,719 m above sea level" (+45 m rim) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9586720 and the crater floor 170 m below ? When clarified, the crater:age=50 kya could also be added. Why are there two "meteor crater" ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11222109 + https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9586720
22025-05-21 17:08commentedti-lo
♦618		Also see https://umap.openstreetmap.de/en/map/meteor-craters_94040#16/35.0269/-111.0264
32025-05-25 19:28closedti-lo
♦618		deleted the additional one
4775116
Category: unknown		12025-05-25 17:14openedti-lo
♦618		"Mount Éboulements (Mont des Éboulements) is considered the central rebound of the Earth's crust following moments after the meteor impact" --> (part of a) crater ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:geological%3Dmeteor_crater
22025-05-25 17:14commentedti-lo
♦618		As of wikipedia : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_%C3%89boulements
32025-11-07 00:18closedMartin868
♦3,716
4775041
Category: unknown		12025-05-25 16:19openedti-lo
♦618		Crater https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198153360 could be joined with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198153361/history into a relation, as according to Wikipedia from the same impact
206949212020-01-26 12:57openedti-lo
♦618		Opening hours are missing, couldn't find a website
22025-05-24 08:49commentednotmyproblem1
♦779		I think it's illegal to not have Opening Hours in the shop written. Does this still exist after 5 years?
32025-05-24 10:27commentedti-lo
♦618		I don't think it's mandatory. At least the tourism page of Oulx still lists it https://turismo-oulx.it/territorio/dove-mangiare/ristoranti/la-barrica
360903012023-03-22 20:06openedti-lo
♦618		military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad
22025-05-20 06:39commentedliteran
♦81,675		что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках
32025-05-20 17:28commentedti-lo
♦618		те же факты, что и в случае с https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3609034
42025-05-22 19:56closedliteran
♦81,675		 Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием.
52025-05-23 00:45reopenedti-lo
♦618
62025-05-23 00:45commentedti-lo
♦618		В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»?
72025-05-28 17:38closedliteran
♦81,675		в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации
360902812023-03-22 20:06openedti-lo
♦618		military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad
22025-05-20 06:39commentedliteran
♦81,675		что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках
32025-05-20 17:29commentedti-lo
♦618		те же факты, что и в случае с https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3609034
42025-05-22 19:55closedliteran
♦81,675		 Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием.
52025-05-23 00:45reopenedti-lo
♦618
62025-05-23 00:45commentedti-lo
♦618		В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»?
72025-05-28 17:38closedliteran
♦81,675		в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации
360903612023-03-22 20:08openedti-lo
♦618		military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad
22025-05-20 06:40commentedliteran
♦81,675		что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках
32025-05-22 19:55closedliteran
♦81,675		 Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием.
42025-05-23 00:45reopenedti-lo
♦618
52025-05-23 00:45commentedti-lo
♦618		В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»?
62025-05-28 17:37closedliteran
♦81,675		в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации
360903212023-03-22 20:07openedti-lo
♦618		military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad
22025-05-20 06:39commentedliteran
♦81,675		что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках
32025-05-20 17:29commentedti-lo
♦618		те же факты, что и в случае с https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3609034
42025-05-22 19:55closedliteran
♦81,675		 Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием.
52025-05-23 00:44reopenedti-lo
♦618
62025-05-23 00:44commentedti-lo
♦618		В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»?
72025-05-28 17:38closedliteran
♦81,675		в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации
360902612023-03-22 20:05openedti-lo
♦618		military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad
22025-05-20 06:39commentedliteran
♦81,675		что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках
32025-05-20 17:29commentedti-lo
♦618		те же факты, что и в случае с https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3609034
42025-05-22 19:55closedliteran
♦81,675		 Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием.
52025-05-23 00:44reopenedti-lo
♦618
62025-05-23 00:44commentedti-lo
♦618		В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»?
72025-05-28 17:38closedliteran
♦81,675		в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации
360903412023-03-22 20:07openedti-lo
♦618		military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad
22025-05-20 06:40commentedliteran
♦81,675		что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках
32025-05-20 17:25commentedti-lo
♦618		Это дифференциация стартовых площадок https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318838929/history см https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=launchpad#values. вышестоящая единица - космопорт https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6721734
42025-05-20 17:53commentedti-lo
♦618		Также см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:aeroway#%D0%A1%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8B
52025-05-20 18:03commentedti-lo
♦618		сравнить с https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/317711 launchpads - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/24wU
62025-05-20 18:10commentedti-lo
♦618		похожие https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316967069 launchpads - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/24x0
72025-05-20 18:32commentedliteran
♦81,675		так что конкретно исправить или добавить в базу надо?
82025-05-20 18:41commentedti-lo
♦618		Будь то военные стартовые площадки или площадки для космических путешествий. Те, что находятся на космодромах, обычно называются аэродромами. Также можно использовать aeroway:military=launchpad или aeroway:research=launchpad (если они не отправляются на орбиту, а предназначены для исследований).
92025-05-20 18:45commentedti-lo
♦618		Стартовые площадки в США или Китае также называются «aeroway», если они находятся на военных объектах, но предназначены для полетов в космос. См. примеры выше
102025-05-20 19:52commentedliteran
♦81,675		еще раз: Что неверно здесь отмечено? что нужно исправить? Я вас не понимаю
112025-05-20 21:24commentedti-lo
♦618		Я не могу сказать, правильно это или нет, я спрашиваю о статусе. Что было непонятно в примерах?
122025-05-22 19:55closedliteran
♦81,675		Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием.
132025-05-23 00:44reopenedti-lo
♦618
142025-05-23 00:44commentedti-lo
♦618		В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»?
152025-05-28 17:37closedliteran
♦81,675		в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации
360903512023-03-22 20:07openedti-lo
♦618		military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad
22025-05-20 06:40commentedliteran
♦81,675		что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках
32025-05-20 17:28commentedti-lo
♦618		те же факты, что и в случае с https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3609034
42025-05-22 19:55closedliteran
♦81,675		 Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием.
52025-05-23 00:43reopenedti-lo
♦618
62025-05-23 00:43commentedti-lo
♦618		В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»?
72025-05-28 17:37closedliteran
♦81,675		в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации
4767469
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 01:33openedti-lo
♦618		Welche Art von Krater ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1531693644, Alternativen siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater
22025-05-21 18:51commentedlapoga17
♦453		Welcher Krater genau ist gemeint?
32025-05-21 22:37commentedti-lo
♦618		Naja, der verlinkte https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1531693644. Unklar was für eine Art von "Krater" das sein soll
42025-05-22 13:21commentedlapoga17
♦453		Das könnte einer der seltenen Irrtümer von fkv sein. Am Pauliberg gibt es keinen Krater. Ein Sekundärkrater entsteht bei einem Einschlagereignis. Das scheidet aus.
52025-05-22 16:02commentedti-lo
♦618		Evtl. das ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dsinkhole
62025-05-22 16:21commentedlapoga17
♦453		Sinkhole ist so etwas wie Doline. Pauliberg ist Basalt und wäscht nicht aus so wie Kalk. Es gibt allerdings die Vierlöcherhöhle, die ist eingezeichnet. Das ganze Gebiet ist ein großer Tagbau der einen Krater, so jemals existent, eliminiert hat.
72025-05-22 16:26commentedti-lo
♦618		Dann einfach löschen ? fkv scheint seit 2 Jahren nicht mehr aktiv zu sein, können wir schlecht fragen ?
82025-05-22 16:29closedlapoga17
♦453		fkv ist leider verstorben. Ich lösche den Punkt.
4770770
Category: unknown		12025-05-22 12:00openedti-lo
♦618		There are two entries for the same crater https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6984516667 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198170990/history
336785012022-09-21 12:52openedti-lo
♦618		https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/faculty=geography ?
22025-05-21 16:12closedPhil Prinsloo
32025-05-21 16:13reopenedPhil Prinsloo
42025-05-21 16:13closedPhil Prinsloo
52025-05-21 17:11reopenedti-lo
♦618
62025-05-21 17:12commentedti-lo
♦618		What's the "resolution" ?
72025-06-22 11:43closedPhil Prinsloo
4769911
Category: unknown		12025-05-21 17:06openedti-lo
♦618		Further info missing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11314392009, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dmeteor_crater
4769869
Category: unknown		12025-05-21 16:38openedti-lo
♦618		This should be an area with a 55km diameter https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2085932144
4769787
Category: unknown		12025-05-21 15:25openedti-lo
♦618		Gemäss Wikipedia nur eine Theorie ? Ggf. ungefähren Umkreis einzeichnen, sofern neue Erkenntnisse vorliegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3115121276/historyAccording to Wikipedia just a theory? If necessary, draw an approximate circle, provided new findings are available
4769703
Category: unknown		12025-05-21 14:18openedti-lo
♦618		Shouldn't be a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2006086754 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological=meteor_crater. Only one occurrence of crater:exposed https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=crater%3Aexposed (no idea what it should mean)
4769580
Category: unknown		12025-05-21 13:05openedti-lo
♦618		most likely a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dvolcanic_vent
22025-06-12 14:25closedkabelhaai
♦2,021		Mapped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167536459
4769578
Category: unknown		12025-05-21 13:05openedti-lo
♦618		most likely a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dvolcanic_vent
4767473
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 03:36openedti-lo
♦618		Which type of crater ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12757140172, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater
22025-05-20 23:42commentedK12230LF
♦16,396		Have you asked directly the person that added that crater ? It is very unlikely that your note will be answered otherwise
32025-05-20 23:51commentedti-lo
♦618		Similar to the before mentioned, occasional mapper https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jeandive. And YOU answered ;-)
42025-05-20 23:56commentedK12230LF
♦16,396		I did because I think that this note will remain opened for years. Why did you choose those two items and not for example a postbox that did not have a reference or an hotel without opening_hours ?
52025-05-21 00:09commentedti-lo
♦618		I really care more about hotels (or others) without opening_hours, but stumbled on craters (as a "hole" ;-)) via https://spacey.space/@spaceflight/114535245443506671
62025-05-21 00:11commentedti-lo
♦618		To simply tag a hole is outdated https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater (not my idea, but makes sense)
72025-12-01 12:46commentedK12230LF
♦16,396		If we open this area with IGN MNT LIDAR HD with see that this crater seems to be related to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/873727748/history So maybe we can transform this into an area instead of a single point ?
4767487
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 02:17openedti-lo
♦618		Most likely a sinkhole ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358797513/history , see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater
22025-05-20 13:35commentedgpserror
♦12,239		possible that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9530375419 is technically the same object?! But yeah this object is tagged badly as it stands.
32025-05-20 13:42commentedgpserror
♦12,239		BTW, name came from USGS/GNIS most likely and probably could be left for now. Actually I'm not sure what to do with this as I'm not a geologist. Is this an extinct volcano or an impact crater? I'm currently guessing a volcano.
42025-05-20 22:16commentedti-lo
♦618		Asked iandees (who created it 16 years ago)
52025-05-20 23:24commentedgpserror
♦12,239		think the number of impact craters are lower than number of volcanoes, I suspect if it can't be checked with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_impact_structures_on_Earth it's probably a volcano?
62025-05-20 23:48commentedti-lo
♦618		The wikipedia article looks quite detailed, but I think the combination of OSM and "text" info is the "real thing". So some "local" should give the input what it is. If the origin should not be determined, this could also be tagged
72025-06-02 17:29commentedOddlyAngled
♦427		it is a pit crater https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_crater
82025-06-02 18:11closedOddlyAngled
♦427		I'm not sure what the proper tag is for it, sinkhole or caldera, but I removed the dupe and went with sinkhole. please reopen this if you have a better suggestion.
92025-06-02 18:33reopenedgpserror
♦12,239		The only thing I have a concern with as a sink hole is that the topology looks like it goes up and then goes down. If I'm reading it right, the rim goes up to around 5700ft and then sinks down to 5520ft but not exactly...elevation seems to continue to go up as you go east. To the northwest it's downhill... Should a sinkhole have a rim?
102025-06-02 19:42commentedOddlyAngled
♦427		yeah I am not sure either, it also doesn’t seem like a volcano even though it is volcanic. anyone else have an opinion?
4767494
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 02:29openedti-lo
♦618		Which kind of crater ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357349420/history, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater
22025-05-20 13:52commentedgpserror
♦12,239		probably related to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9695603018
32025-05-20 18:51commentedti-lo
♦618		Pretty sure, but should be consolidated with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569716850 (and not several nodes). Probably an "outer" and an "inner" crater ? "Crater Lake details" indicates there's natural=water in the middle ? Also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=crater
42025-05-20 19:08commentedti-lo
♦618		Wikipedia says "a volcanic crater about 150 m wide and 30 m deep...which now contains a Crater Lake" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wizard_Island
52025-05-20 23:22commentedgpserror
♦12,239		So volcano... I think the number of verifiable impact craters are lower than number of confirmed volcano craters so I think it might be safe to assume this is a volcano.
62025-05-20 23:25commentedti-lo
♦618		Certainly, this wasn't the question. Just the way of tagging it (inner & outer circle or how) ?
4767474
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 01:36openedti-lo
♦618		Which type ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6350491514, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater
22025-05-20 21:42commentedK12230LF
♦16,396		Have you asked directly the person that added that crater ? It is very unlikely that your note will be answered otherwise
32025-05-20 21:48commentedti-lo
♦618		It usually depends on the time of the entry whether I ask directly or leave a note. In this case the original mapper doesn't seem to be very active https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bunny-Le-Lub
42025-06-12 07:50commentedGeorgeKaplan
♦24,937		Nonetheless, you have higher probability to get an answer when asking in the changeset. BTW, the original mapper has contributed very recently.
360903312023-03-22 20:07openedti-lo
♦618		military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad
22025-05-20 06:40commentedliteran
♦81,675		что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках
32025-05-20 17:28commentedti-lo
♦618		те же факты, что и в случае с https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3609034
42025-05-22 19:55closedliteran
♦81,675		 Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием.
4767508
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 03:11openedti-lo
♦618		There's an outer https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227647624 and an inner section, please check : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834317236/history
4767496
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 02:35openedti-lo
♦618		Most likely a volcano ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/359258391/history https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater
4767484
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 02:13openedti-lo
♦618		tag outdated https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5260821225/history, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater
22025-05-26 17:27closedCarlos Martin Noriega
♦1,177		Updated. This is the entrance to the cenote cave.
4767479
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 01:48openedti-lo
♦618		Which kind of crater ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293252784, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater
4767478
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 01:47openedti-lo
♦618		Doesn't seem very "natural" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314049193, probably https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/historic=crash_site or crash_crater ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater
4767471
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 01:34openedti-lo
♦618		Welche Art ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1452292755, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater
4767468
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 01:29openedti-lo
♦618		Shouldn't be a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11700640827, correct tagging : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ageological%3Dvolcanic_caldera_rim
4767466
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 01:27openedti-lo
♦618		No English description found for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112185745, see https://ceb.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_East_Crater
4767422
Category: unknown		12025-05-19 23:29openedti-lo
♦618		Should be an area ?
4682955
Category: unknown		12025-03-26 08:54openedti-lo
♦618		Last launch 2017 ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxus_(rocket) >> disused ?
22025-04-12 18:21commentedFjellrev
♦1,683		I would not set any of the launchpads to disused without proper control on the ground before doing so. Why? According to their website https://sscspace.com/esrange/ Esrange operates 4 permanent launchers in this complex and this is the number that is mapped right now. Getting up to date information for outsiders may be more difficult than before in these times...
32025-05-19 00:11commentedti-lo
♦618		There are now two "LC-3", but the spaceport area is unclear https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291715881 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439539132
4766042
Category: unknown		12025-05-18 23:53openedti-lo
♦618		Where is their launch infrastructure ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8807980194
384304212023-08-19 22:27openedti-lo
♦618		Looks quite different here : https://consultation.shetlandspacecentre.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/60617516-ACM-XX-00-DR-CE-0071-2-min-scaled.jpg
22025-05-18 22:24closedti-lo
♦618		Link doesn't work any more
4765969
Category: unknown		12025-05-18 22:11openedti-lo
♦618		Is most likely here : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4665893
357304412023-02-24 15:46openedti-lo
♦618		This should be an area, not a node : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7467035954
22023-02-24 15:47commentedti-lo
♦618		There's another "spaceport" around this one : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174778130 Also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dspaceport
32025-05-18 21:59closedti-lo
♦618		Is now an area https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18022920/history
4755032
Category: unknown		12025-05-12 10:50opened---Baink shofehulla chowdhory baink Bank of Shah Faisal Chowdhury Bank
22025-05-18 21:51closedti-lo
♦618		not translateable
4765950
Category: unknown		12025-05-18 21:44openedti-lo
♦618		Should have a name https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376717974/history
4765924
Category: unknown		12025-05-18 21:36openedti-lo
♦618		https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31490791 - "As of 2023, the investors have called off the project, and the property is on sale", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceport_Camden#History
4765890
Category: unknown		12025-05-18 21:21openedti-lo
♦618		Should have a name : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027553277/history
4765889
Category: unknown		12025-05-18 21:20openedti-lo
♦618		Should have a name : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376713053/history
4765885
Category: unknown		12025-05-18 21:13openedti-lo
♦618		Should be integrated to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569433118 (if verified that correct)
4689582
Category: unknown		12025-03-30 22:51openedti-lo
♦618		no idea what "model_sport:electric" should mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8090898440
22025-03-30 23:20commentedfortera_au
♦189		Looks to be from a proposal to increase the scope of model_aerodrome. Not sure if it would apply in this case, but sport=rc_car could be a good option if someone has more details on the club itself to confirm.
32025-03-31 04:08commentedti-lo
♦618		This would already exist : https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/sport=rc_car
42025-03-31 04:30commentedfortera_au
♦189		I meant that tag may suit that node if someone has more details about that specific club.
52025-04-13 02:10closedCloCkWeRX
♦4,331		Remote control car race track
62025-04-13 05:18reopenedti-lo
♦618
72025-04-13 05:19commentedti-lo
♦618		See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Drc_car + https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dmotor
82025-05-15 03:00commentednrs19
♦27		Radio Racing Cars SA Inc https://rrcsa.org.au/
92025-05-15 15:03commentedti-lo
♦618		Does this apply to the whole area ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27631389
102025-05-27 01:59commentednrs19
♦27		No. The radio-controlled model cars use the track in the northern part, which is fenced. In the southern part, there is a BMZ bike track.
112025-09-18 04:14closedGeeMaps!
♦2,769		added: changeset #: 172092523
4755806
Category: unknown		12025-05-12 18:49openedti-lo
♦618		Wo ist das eigentliche Weingut ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:craft%3DwineryWhere is the actual winery? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:craft=winery
4755440
Category: unknown		12025-05-12 15:38openedti-lo
♦618		There's a description for "balloon tagging" : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373320167
22025-05-20 18:28closedWelshie
♦1,651		tagged, I think
4755436
Category: unknown		12025-05-12 15:37openedti-lo
♦618		There's a description for "balloon tagging" : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6501798198
4755431
Category: unknown		12025-05-12 15:35openedti-lo
♦618		There's a description for "balloon tagging" : osm.wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4974008060/history
22025-05-12 16:46closedJakka
♦32,669		update https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4974008060
4755424
Category: unknown		12025-05-12 15:33openedti-lo
♦618		There's a description for "balloon tagging" : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons
4694972
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:36openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
22025-04-25 10:48commentedkapazao
♦4,371		Please explain the problem here. I see tags are correct. I will close the note soon
32025-04-25 12:50commentedti-lo
♦618		This is the "grown structure" way to tag it https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771851208. It would be better to use the namespace, as this way you may simply use all the values of the "big" aeroways. In this example aeroway:model_aerodrome=runway. There are for instance many "types" of "launchpad" https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=launchpad#values
42025-05-05 17:40closedkapazao
♦4,371		I have checked the area and I made some editions. I think tagging is correct. If you know a better way to do it you are free to edit it. Regards
52025-05-06 23:03reopenedti-lo
♦618
62025-05-06 23:03closedti-lo
♦618		Done so https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771851208
4694938
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:28openedti-lo
♦618		Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#ModelleIt was never "discussed out" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, but there would be a new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Models
22025-04-27 09:23closedHedaja
♦1,065		bisher ist aeroway=model_runway deutlich weiter verbreitet (742x) als aeroway:model_aerodrome=runway (12x) Ich glaube eine Notiz auf der Karte ist für eine solche Diskussion eher ungeünsitg. Am besten im Forum anbringen, dann könnte man vllt ein allgemeines umtaggen anstreben.
32025-04-27 12:57reopenedti-lo
♦618
42025-04-27 12:58commentedti-lo
♦618		Damit es nochmal eine Dekade dauert ? Ich halte "voting with the feet" für sinnvoller. Wurde das eigentlich im Forum adressiert ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atower%3Atype%3Danchor
4689697
Category: unknown		12025-03-31 03:42openedti-lo
♦618		Sollte eine Fläche sein https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12660847688It should be an area https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12660847688
22025-04-21 00:48commentedcrodthauser
♦573		Es gab jetzt einige Änderungen, aber keine Diskussion in dieser Note. Hat sich mit der aktuellen Taggingvariante die Notiz und das fixme erledigt?
32025-04-21 01:00commentedti-lo
♦618		Welche Änderungen sind gemeint ? Ich finde einen Punkt einfach nicht ausreichend (kann man von der gesamten Wiese starten oder wie). Die "aktuelle Variante" wäre https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway:balloon (Namespace, insbesondere wegen der "missbräuchlichen" Verwendung von "launchpad" notwendig geworden - jede Menge Raketenstarts "von der grünen Wiese" ?)
42025-04-21 01:28commentedcrodthauser
♦573		(Die Änderung der Linie aeroway=airstrip zu einem Punkt mit der Begründung, dass es der Empfehlung entspricht, der folgenden Änderung zu aeroway:ballon=airstrip + fixme und dann der Änderung zu aeroway=balloon.) Über den Namen des alten Ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233394985/history habe ich das folgende Bild gefunden: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a4/Freiballon_startplatz_k%C3%B6ln.jpg Ich kann mich nicht daran erinnern, dass dies dort noch steht. Aber ich werde mal dort vorbeifahren und nachschauen. Falls es doch dort steht, wirkt es wie auf die gesamte Wiese bezogen.
52025-04-21 01:41commentedti-lo
♦618		Interessanterweise scheinen die keinen Internetauftritt zu haben (Webseite). Die bisherigen Änderungen würde ich auf fehlende Doku zurückführen, wobei "as recommended by OSM" ausgesprochen vage ist. Seit Ende März wäre das "recommended" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:balloon:* bzw. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3Aballoon
62025-04-24 00:15commentedcrodthauser
♦573		Ich war vor Ort. Es gibt zwei Schilder, die auf den Startplatz verweisen, je eines am jeweiligen Ende der folgenden Wiesenfläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1380461851, weshalb ich diese Fläche als airstrip eingetragen habe. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165355752 Die Beschreibung der Wiki ist für mich nicht ganz eindeutig. Wenn das Tagging so nun passt, können wir die Notiz schließen.
4694971
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:36openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
22025-04-21 00:21closedKanenas
♦57		Seems like this is already the case. Marked as resolved. Put a new note if you meant something else.
32025-04-21 00:24reopenedti-lo
♦618
42025-04-21 00:27commentedti-lo
♦618		It's about the "details" like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366542288. With the namespace, you may simply call it like the "real ones" (value), but put the "suffix" behind "aeroway". No need to "invent" an individual syntax
52025-04-21 00:31commentedKanenas
♦57		So, what is missing is the tag aeroway:model_aerodrome=runway from the long way?
62025-04-21 00:39commentedti-lo
♦618		In the above example, it would be called aeroway:model_aerodrome=taxiway , just like the "real ones" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dtaxiway . So there's no need to "invent values from scratch" (the "job" is done by the suffix instead). There's a similar problem especially for "launchpad", therefore the "standardisation" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad#Similar_tags
72025-04-21 00:42commentedti-lo
♦618		Another example (33 so far) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Aballoon%3Dlaunchpad
82025-04-21 00:44commentedKanenas
♦57		It seems that i misunderstood your first note. It should be resolved by someone that knows more about these places.
92025-04-21 00:49commentedti-lo
♦618		Maybe the note was a bit short, sorry for that. But as of the "tradition" from 2008 (with no outcome), the "new" variant needs first to be accepted by "voting with the feet" (acting this way)
102025-08-24 05:49commentedNGlf
♦31		Feel free to edit if you know a better tag. I am no expert in runways either, models or not :)
4699574
Category: unknown		12025-04-07 00:01openedti-lo
♦618		Not clear which is the main website https://www.airballoonthailand.com
22025-04-07 00:02commentedti-lo
♦618		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12735432799
4699567
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 23:32openedti-lo
♦618		A couple of "anchor" towers https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/21NE , are now called line_attachment=anchor . Could otherwise be mistaken https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:*#Airship_tower
4699565
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 23:30openedti-lo
♦618		lots of "anchor" towers https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/21ND , Are now called line_attachment=anchor. Could otherwise be mistaken https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:*#Airship_tower
4699564
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 23:27openedti-lo
♦618		power "anchor" is now called line_attachment=anchor https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/21NC , could otherwise be mistaken https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:*#Airship_tower
4699563
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 23:23openedti-lo
♦618		A bunch of "anchor towers" here https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/21Nz. Is now called "line_attachment=anchor". Could otherwise be mistaken https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:*#Airship_tower
4699562
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 23:20openedti-lo
♦618		A bunch of "anchor" towers here https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/21Ny , I assume not for balloons ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:*#Airship_tower >>> line_attachment=anchor
4699561
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 23:14openedti-lo
♦618		8 "anchor" towers here https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/21Nx, I assume they are some other tower type (communication ?) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:*#Tower_types
4699560
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 23:10openedti-lo
♦618		An "anchor" for what ?
22025-08-03 18:48closedNicaTopo
♦129		I can'f find "anchor". Closing.
32025-08-03 22:04reopenedTourism_info
♦103
42025-08-03 22:05commentedTourism_info
♦103		This one : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5156248921
4699559
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 22:59openedti-lo
♦618		An aeroway ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281361714 >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway:balloon
4699558
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 22:59openedti-lo
♦618		An aeroway ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281361720/history >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway:balloon
4699557
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 22:57openedti-lo
♦618		Vermutlich line_attachment=anchor ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tower:type=anchorProbably anchor tower type
4699556
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 22:55openedti-lo
♦618		Balloon mooring tower ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway:balloon >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6131470527
22025-09-25 14:03closedOpenminded320
♦23		Mooring for Airships ! So you are correct
4699553
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 22:49openedti-lo
♦618		What type of "anchor" is this ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:* , or is it a simple tower- like building ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dtower
22025-08-24 21:58closedNunoCaldeira
♦796
4694985
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:40openedti-lo
♦618		Model runway "on top" of the helipad ? 2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
22025-04-04 03:41commentedti-lo
♦618		https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/721776616
32025-04-05 17:12commenteduprkos
♦7,276		Sorry, not an aviation expert here, could you please clarify what does this note mean and what is expected? If any discussion is required, OSM forum seems to be a better place than notes. Thanks!
42025-04-05 18:07commentedti-lo
♦618		There's this entry https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/721776616 on top of this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236090831. Very unlikely that it looks like this in reality
52025-04-11 12:24commentedMateusz Konieczny
♦36,579		zapytałem się na https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74062219 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158962980
62025-04-22 21:23closedFabcio
♦13		Zgodnie z Planem Zagospodarowanie Lotniska Pobiednik Wielki, obszarem tym jest "krąg modelarski". Nie znajduje się już w nim lądowisko dla helikopterów. Wprowadziłem poprawki w tym miejscu.
4696608
Category: unknown		12025-04-05 07:24openedti-lo
♦618		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11039886825 >> boat:tours https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:boat:tours for sport=scuba_diving ?
4696606
Category: unknown		12025-04-05 07:16openedti-lo
♦618		unclear why ferry was removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14613758/history
22025-04-07 05:35commentedkmpoppe
♦3,578		Added a comment to the changeset discussion
32025-05-21 01:09closedQuigleyJones
♦2,786
4689686
Category: unknown		12025-03-31 03:25openedti-lo
♦618		airstrip ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Aballoon%3Dairstrip
22025-04-04 18:05commentedti-lo
♦618		Also asked the club https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115666342, no feedback yet
4695946
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 16:40openedti-lo
♦618		Error message for contact@annonay-aerostation.com https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12729139590, please check if still valid : https://www.annonay-aerostation.com
22025-04-16 21:29commentedYahourt
♦5		correctes with informations from https://www.annonay.fr/annuaire/annonay-berceau-de-laerostation
32025-04-16 21:30closedYahourt
♦5
4694982
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:38openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
22025-04-04 06:59commentedGeorgeKaplan
♦24,937		What do you want OSM contributors to change here ?
32025-04-04 14:47commentedti-lo
♦618		This one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/578896628 (to fit to the namespace of other aeroways)
42025-08-06 11:05closedK12230LF
♦16,396		updated with aeroway:model_aerodrome=runway aeroway=model_aerodrome
4694987
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:45openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned osm.wiki/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: osm.wiki/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
4694981
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:38openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
4694979
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:37openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
4694976
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:37openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
22025-08-11 19:07closedhomer__simpsons
♦2,919		Tout me semble déjà correct, je ferme.
4694974
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:36openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
22025-10-21 13:21closedHugoren Martinako
♦3,239		That was already mapped, but another guy duplicated the aeroway
4694970
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:35openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
4694969
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:35openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
4694967
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:34openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
22025-09-07 20:16commentedkaleidoscopica
♦347		To be clear, since I've been looking at the two links and I'm still confused - what is the specific suggested tag to replace sport=model_aerodrome? I'm a bit wary of changing tags I know little about that do have de facto status (per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dmodel_aerodrome).
4694960
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:33openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
4694955
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:32openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
4694953
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:32openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
22025-07-29 10:03closeddannmer
♦16,853		updated
4694951
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:31openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
4694948
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:30openedti-lo
♦618		2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
4694943
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:29openedti-lo
♦618		Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#ModelleIt was never "discussed out" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, but there would be a new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Models
22025-05-29 16:04closedMichael_H
♦965		Das Proposal steht auf "abandoned". Es ist also abgeschlossen. Das aktuelle Tagging folgt einem Schema mit "Status: de facto". Es ist also alles bestmöglich kartiert.
4694937
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:27openedti-lo
♦618		Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#ModelleIt was never "discussed out" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, but there would be a new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Models
4694936
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:27openedti-lo
♦618		Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#ModelleIt was never "discussed out" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, but there would be a new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Models
4694932
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:26openedti-lo
♦618		Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#ModelleIt was never "discussed out" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, but there would be a new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Models
4694931
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:26openedti-lo
♦618		Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#ModelleIt was never "discussed out" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, but there would be a new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Models
4694929
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:25openedti-lo
♦618		Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#ModelleIt was never "discussed out" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, but there would be a new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Models
4694921
Category: unknown		12025-04-04 03:14openedti-lo
♦618		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6791372416 should be an area https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3Aballoon
4689633
Category: unknown		12025-03-31 01:35openedti-lo
♦618		An airstrip for balloons ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Aballoon%3Dairstrip
22025-03-31 14:17commentedliteran
♦81,675		Что конкретно вы предлагаете исправить в данном месте? В чем заключается ошибка или недостаток?
32025-04-01 10:05commentedti-lo
♦618		Поляна "Аэростат" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45852144 вероятно, является отправной точкой ?
42025-04-01 10:06commentedti-lo
♦618		aeroway:balloon=airstrip или нет ?
52025-04-01 19:27commentedliteran
♦81,675		нет, это просто название
62025-04-04 02:54closedti-lo
♦618		"Aerostat Glade" seems to have nothing to do with Balloons (unless it looks like the word is the same as in English https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82)
4694349
Category: unknown		12025-04-03 14:55openedti-lo
♦618		On this picture https://bathhotairballoonclub.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/IMG_1804.jpeg it looks like "Snake Meadows" probably extends to the neighbouring field (Saltford border). Could someone please check on site or with the club ? https://bathhotairballoonclub.co.uk/contact (wrote them, but so far no feedback). There are also some hints here for further details : "Snake Meadows has CCTV surveillance operating 24/7" (monitoring/surveillance) "locking the middle gate" (where is the gate ?), "Please keep out of the meadow areas [...] marked as restricted" (where ?), "car parking needs to be pre-booked" (reservation), "Toilet facilities are provided" (permanently ?) https://bathhotairballoonclub.co.uk/site-guide
4682889
Category: unknown		12025-03-26 07:48openedti-lo
♦618		Bournemouth Eye Ballon seems to be missing, tagging : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aattraction%3Dtethered_balloon
22025-03-26 07:54commentedti-lo
♦618		https://www.bournemouthballoon.com
32025-03-26 09:20closedMex
♦7,210		added
42025-04-01 19:51reopenedTom Curd
♦107		The balloon was removed after damage in 2017. See https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-39154378 It has never returned
52025-04-01 19:55closedTom Curd
♦107		Attraction removed in changeset #164391484. The website referred to in the original note is still live but incorrect
62025-04-01 23:38reopenedti-lo
♦618
72025-04-01 23:39closedti-lo
♦618		Thanks, found a source https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-39154378
4689695
Category: unknown		12025-03-31 03:36openedti-lo
♦618		Sollte eine Fläche sein https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2592914557 >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway:balloonIt should be an area https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2592914557 >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway:balloon
22025-03-31 20:11commentedti-lo
♦618		Namespace : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway:*#Balloons
32025-03-31 20:11commentedti-lo
♦618		https://www.ballonsportclub-reichshof.com/kontakt
4689723
Category: unknown		12025-03-31 04:44openedti-lo
♦618		"first launch of stratospheric balloon from the site south of Tucson International Airport." https://tucson.com/news/local/article_5dc4e87c-a6d9-11e7-b024-4733c984b10a.html >>> launchpad ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway:balloon
4689698
Category: unknown		12025-03-31 03:43openedti-lo
♦618		Should be an area https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7663463434
22025-03-31 10:04closedWelshie
♦1,651		converted to area
4689688
Category: unknown		12025-03-31 03:30openedti-lo
♦618		Should be an area https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/665284758 >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway:balloon
22025-04-06 20:07closedsöm4324
♦3,274		Hi, I gave this node an aeroway:balloon tag. But as here's only meadow (no marked area) a node instead of an area is totally ok. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164607453
4689684
Category: unknown		12025-03-31 03:24openedti-lo
♦618		Die ganze Fläche ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3051996217 >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3AballoonThe entire area?
4689682
Category: unknown		12025-03-31 03:22openedti-lo
♦618		Welche Art von Ballon startet hier ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:balloon:*What kind of balloon is starting here? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:balloon:*
22025-03-31 03:22commentedti-lo
♦618		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3007057777
32025-06-27 19:48closedasdf999
♦7		Nach der https://ballonsportgruppe-stuttgart.de/unsere-ballone/ hat der Verein 4 Heißluftballone und 2 Gasballone.
4689672
Category: unknown		12025-03-31 03:11openedti-lo
♦618		Website defect, still valid ? : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:attraction%3Dballoon_ride
22025-05-15 01:22closedLaLinea
♦2,034		Ballooning Reichart gibt es nicht mehr, wurde 2013 von Bavaria Ballon übernommem. Quelle: https://www.bavaria-ballon.de/kontakt/ueber-uns/ Objekt entfernt: https://osm.org/node/1082544414
4689657
Category: unknown		12025-03-31 02:35openedti-lo
♦618		Gemäss Wikipedia nicht allgemein Luftfahrt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:museum%3DballoonAccording to Wikipedia not general aviation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:museum=balloon
22025-04-16 10:55closedrene78
♦2,589		erledigt.
4689639
Category: unknown		12025-03-31 01:47openedti-lo
♦618		balloon:memorial=plaque ? (one tag to find them all)
22025-07-24 22:25closeddannmer
♦16,853		on the map
4676690
Category: unknown		12025-03-22 19:54openedti-lo
♦618		Unclear what is meant with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11135984773. Most likely the runway should be tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1200909381. As of ToprakM the website* indicates the whole area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1200909388 could be an aeroway:uav=aerodrome https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3Auav *https://usrl.cyi.ac.cy/?page_id=2206
22025-03-30 22:57commentedLayft Greater
♦2,381		I suggest to send a message to the original mapper of the aerodrome for clarification https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11135984773/history
32025-03-30 23:24closedti-lo
♦618		Moved the node values to the runway https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11135984773 >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1200909381
4688146
Category: unknown		12025-03-30 03:26openedti-lo
♦618		Probably a line_attachment=anchor ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atower%3Atype%3Danchor
22025-03-31 11:58closedPiagno
♦17,039		https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164327003
4688145
Category: unknown		12025-03-30 03:26openedti-lo
♦618		Probably a line_attachment=anchor ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atower%3Atype%3Danchor
22025-03-31 11:59closedPiagno
♦17,039		https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164327034
4688144
Category: unknown		12025-03-30 03:25openedti-lo
♦618		Probably a line_attachment=anchor ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atower%3Atype%3Danchor
22025-03-31 12:00closedPiagno
♦17,039		https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164327067
4682959
Category: unknown		12025-03-26 09:00openedti-lo
♦618		The last German launch was before 2011 according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rockets_launched_from_Esrange#2011%E2%80%932020 >> disused ?
22025-03-26 11:44commentedHidoo00
♦4,564		Idk, feels like you know the stuff and can make a judgement?
32025-03-29 02:23commentedti-lo
♦618		I'm not sure whether the Wikipedia-article is up to date, but it sounds like the last launch was 14 years ago. The last update was 8 years ago (exept the update regarding launch_pad vs. launchpad) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259671385/history. Unfortunately, the pad is additionally not shown on the map and just seen if you search via overpass (as there's no "building" or similar entry). There was an update 10 months ago, perhaps this user may have news ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152581198 (thought a "local" would know best)
42025-04-12 18:22commentedFjellrev
♦1,683		I would not set any of the launchpads to disused without proper control on the ground before doing so. Why? According to their website https://sscspace.com/esrange/ Esrange operates 4 permanent launchers in this complex and this is the number that is mapped right now. Getting up to date information for outsiders may be more difficult than before in these times...
4686537
Category: unknown		12025-03-29 00:53openedti-lo
♦618		If the area is ONLY for blimps, use the respective aeroway:balloon key : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway:balloon
22025-07-09 20:09closedHypsometric
♦3,744		Updated.
4684991
Category: unknown		12025-03-27 18:27openedti-lo
♦618		Most likely a line_attachment=anchor ? osm.wiki/wiki/Tag%3Atower%3Atype%3Danchor
22025-03-28 06:37closedPiagno
♦17,039		https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164192924
4684989
Category: unknown		12025-03-27 18:26openedti-lo
♦618		Most likely a line_attachment=anchor ? osm.wiki/wiki/Tag%3Atower%3Atype%3Danchor
4684988
Category: unknown		12025-03-27 18:25openedti-lo
♦618		Most likely a line_attachment=anchor ? osm.wiki/wiki/Tag%3Atower%3Atype%3Danchor
4684987
Category: unknown		12025-03-27 18:24openedti-lo
♦618		Most likely a line_attachment=anchor ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atower%3Atype%3Danchor
22025-04-06 01:20commentedndim
♦5		Looks more like a power line related https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:line_attachment%3Danchor to me than like a tethered balloon related https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atower%3Atype%3Danchor
32025-04-06 01:23closedndim
♦5		Just committed the semiautomatic conversion of tower:type=anchor to line_attachment=anchor
4682987
Category: unknown		12025-03-26 09:37openedti-lo
♦618		should be "proposed" (if at all be mapped) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300327669, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_birth
22025-07-07 17:00closedStefano_1973
♦838
4682986
Category: unknown		12025-03-26 09:37openedti-lo
♦618		should be "proposed" (if at all be mapped) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300327668, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_birth
22025-07-07 17:00closedStefano_1973
♦838
4682985
Category: unknown		12025-03-26 09:36openedti-lo
♦618		should be "proposed" (if at all be mapped) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300327667, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_birth
22025-07-07 17:01closedStefano_1973
♦838		Habe bei allen einen "proposed:" vor "power" gesetzt.
4682984
Category: unknown		12025-03-26 09:35openedti-lo
♦618		should be "proposed" (if at all be mapped) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300327666/history, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_birth
22025-07-07 17:01closedStefano_1973
♦838
4682952
Category: unknown		12025-03-26 08:52openedti-lo
♦618		"the Esrange Skylark launch tower was modified in 2005 for launching Brazilian VSB-30 rocket" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylark_launch_tower#Esrange --> new name ?
22025-04-12 18:26commentedFjellrev
♦1,683		It was added to OSM in 2013, so 8 years after the modification it had (probably) still the old name - might still be the name in use...
403411912023-12-19 15:59opened---Never heard about launches from there, consider https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=rocket_engine_test#values for test sites
22025-03-24 13:38closedti-lo
♦618		Disused suborbital pad https://www.elonx.net/cancelled-spacex-projects-f9r-dev2-and-spaceport-america
4679718
Category: unknown		12025-03-24 08:58openedti-lo
♦618		website link defect. what's offered (if still valid) ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:balloon:launch
22025-03-24 09:37commenteddannmer
♦16,853		Company is likely closed, owner died in balloon crash. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/04/04/arizona-hot-air-balloon-crash-pilot-ketamine-toxicology-autopsy-report/73200298007/
4679715
Category: unknown		12025-03-24 08:56openedti-lo
♦618		What's offered here ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:balloon:launch
22025-03-24 09:40commenteddannmer
♦16,853		Rather than leaving a note, why not just visit the Gilroy Gardens website? https://www.gilroygardens.org/rides/
32025-08-01 07:24closedBlack_Diamond
♦845		The area has been updated to be explicit that this is an amusement park ride.
4679643
Category: unknown		12025-03-24 08:22openedti-lo
♦618		no idea what a "barrage balloon" is, balloon:type=barrage ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:balloon:launch historic=memorial ?
22025-03-24 08:23commentedti-lo
♦618		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9287961773
32025-04-14 15:22closedmike951
42025-04-14 15:23reopenedmike951
52025-05-01 15:09closedFlynn_
♦132		I've fixed the tags, here's what a barrage balloon is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
4676668
Category: unknown		12025-03-22 19:42openedti-lo
♦618		Probably temporary https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12214820701/history according to https://www.ardmediathek.de/video/tagesschau24/mittendrin-aus-wusterhausen-dosse-einkaufen-per-drohne/tagesschau24/Y3JpZDovL3RhZ2Vzc2NoYXUuZGUvNGFjYWRjOGItMzEyOC00NjQwLWJjZjYtZjdhMGVmZDVkMWY3. Should not only be a node if permanent https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3Auav
4674904
Category: unknown		12025-03-21 22:44openedti-lo
♦618		temporary ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/827790088/history
22025-08-03 08:46closedRainero
♦1,371		Wurde schon mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165519079 erledigt.
4665893
Category: unknown		12025-03-15 19:02openedti-lo
♦618		"Etlaq Space Launch Complex is 7.5km south of Port of Duqm and 30km from Duqm Airport, via road on Oman’s southeast coast on the Arabian Sea." https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/oman-spaceport-nears-construction-following-mou-with-us-space-launch-technology-specialist-27-06-2024 It is expected to be fully operational by 2026/2027 https://www.omanobserver.om/article/1162987/oman/community/oman-celebrates-historic-launch-of-duqm-1-rocket No exact plan known : https://static.wixstatic.com/media/944e44_090d47b0ee094fc2ba7494b0e718560a~mv2.jpg Could someone check it locally ? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/construction%3Aaeroway=spaceport
22025-03-17 23:39commentedti-lo
♦618		Another approximate plan : https://etlaq.om/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Etlaq-Spaceport-1536x800.webp, wrote them to get more details
105506712017-07-06 14:59openedyurasiCan someone please confirm whether "Port of Duqm" is located here? Thank you.
22017-08-03 05:30commented---yes
32018-01-28 08:35commented---it is
42025-03-15 19:04closedti-lo
♦618		https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/745954293/history
202026112019-12-08 18:16openedti-lo
♦618		Motorcycle tags : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle Background info : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Namespace_tag_overview#Vehicle_service_tags
22025-03-04 01:26commentedDorneyLake123
♦6,074		what did you mean here?
32025-03-05 10:50closedti-lo
♦618		the syntax, is meanwhile adjusted
4648588
Category: unknown		12025-03-02 23:26openedti-lo
♦618		The usual tag is office=government https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office=government
22025-03-03 11:14closeddannmer
♦16,853		updated
4648586
Category: unknown		12025-03-02 23:24openedti-lo
♦618		If still valid, this would be an office=government https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office=government
22025-03-03 03:58closedCurlingMan13
♦51,140		updated
330414712022-08-07 17:05openedti-lo
♦618		Which parameters for museum and subject ? "showcasing information about the Solar System, cosmology, and spaceflight" as of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong_Space_Museum https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=spaceflight#values https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=astronomy#values https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=aerospace#values Probably multiple ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator "space" may be misinterpreted https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=space#values "science" values should correlate with "faculty" https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/faculty#values
22025-02-11 06:22closedCypp0847
♦183		Amended to science. However "subject" should be sufficient to describe without the use of "faculty"
32025-02-11 15:19reopenedti-lo
♦618
42025-02-11 15:20commentedti-lo
♦618		Seems to generic to me. The question was (also) whether several values could apply besides https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/museum=spaceflight
52025-02-11 15:23commentedti-lo
♦618		"faculty" only applies to universities but similar values are used, such as https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/faculty=astronomy | https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/museum=astronomy
62025-02-11 15:28commentedti-lo
♦618		The correct value might be museum=spaceflight;astronomy, also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Amuseum, should also cover "Solar System, cosmology" ?
72025-02-11 17:38commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		There are only 3+1 `spaceflight` , and 4 `astronomy` . Neither seems dominant. I would suspect some `=aerospace` may be mainly space-related, and obviously many aviation ones don't have a spaceflight showcase. So it doesn't perfect fit either. `=aerospace` has been mass added before https://taghistory.raifer.tech/?#***/museum/aerospace I don't understand how "space" would be misunderstood?
82025-02-11 17:40commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		`museum=science` could yet be fine if `museum=` is treated as a generic category. But it doesn't have enough work done on it. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:museum#Untitled_1 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:tourism=museum#On_subtypes_and_topics_/_museum_subjects
92025-02-11 17:43commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Both https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/faculty#values and https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/department#values aren't widely agreed on, and are being polluted by the faculty and department names. `department=` has further issue with `=store_section` for `=department_store` and `=supermarket` . There's no definite reason to match with `museum=` .
102025-02-11 17:43commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:museum_type#Not_very_clear
112025-02-11 21:39commentedti-lo
♦618		Please try whether this description works for you : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:museum:type%3Dscience
122025-02-12 17:59commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		No. `*type` never works. It's a meaningless suffix.
132025-02-12 22:24commentedti-lo
♦618		Seems to work in a bunch of cases https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:*:type
416900012024-03-26 17:45openedti-lo
♦618		The launchpad seems to have disappeared
22025-01-07 01:14commentedrivermont
♦3,070		How so? I see it on NOAA 2024 imagery.
32025-01-07 11:23commentedti-lo
♦618		I meant on the map. How may I check who removed it ? https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1WJ8
42025-01-24 22:08commentedrivermont
♦3,070		That query returns a launchpad here w568771622, which you are the last editor. Is there a second launchpad here missing? Or do you just mean that it isn't rendering?
52025-01-24 22:55commentedti-lo
♦618		I think you're talking about the one of 39A ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568771622. The note is on 39B https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074042259 and I don't know how to figure out who removed the launchpad.
62025-01-24 23:07commentedrivermont
♦3,070		Oh gotcha, yes that's correct. Using OSMCha you can see historical edits, this link filters changesets in the area of 39B, up to a size limit (so continent changesets aren't included). There are numerous changes in Oct 2023 by two other users but not much since then (sorry, long ass link) https://osmcha.org/filters?filters=%7B%22geometry%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%7B%22coordinates%22%3A%5B%5B%5B-80.628437%2C28.631827%5D%2C%5B-80.626317%2C28.620717%5D%2C%5B-80.613338%2C28.621337%5D%2C%5B-80.614816%2C28.631489%5D%2C%5B-80.628437%2C28.631827%5D%5D%5D%2C%22type%22%3A%22Polygon%22%7D%2C%22value%22%3A%7B%22coordinates%22%3A%5B%5B%5B-80.628437%2C28.631827%5D%2C%5B-80.626317%2C28.620717%5D%2C%5B-80.613338%2C28.621337%5D%2C%5B-80.614816%2C28.631489%5D%2C%5B-80.628437%2C28.631827%5D%5D%5D%2C%22type%22%3A%22Polygon%22%7D%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%2C%22area_lt%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%2210%22%2C%22value%22%3A%2210%22%7D%5D%7D
72025-10-02 17:39commenteddannmer
♦16,853		Is there anything that still needs to be done here?
82025-10-23 10:15closeddannmer
♦16,853		No response, assuming that this has been fixed