ti-lo for the last 12 Monthsti-lo for the last 12 Months| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4978153 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | "Verbesserung" würde so aussehen : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160958758/history , https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:indoor |
| 4978152 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12065296437/history sollte ein Raum/area sein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:indoor |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | Metzor ♦203 | Das sehe ich anders: indoor=yes wird immer noch als Synonym für location=indoor verwendet. | |
| 3571297 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Is the faculty just an office or the whole building ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:campus |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | seichter ♦65 | weder noch Das Gebäude ist der Hauptsitz der Fakultät Informatik inkl. Dekanat, enthält aber auch zwei große Hörsäle, die auch von den anderen Fakultäten genutzt werden. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Eben erst bemerkt, dass das Gebäude sogar sehr detailliert erfasst ist : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3954354 --> dann sollte man das "office" als "weg" an die richtige Stelle platzieren ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2001139174 | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Eine Menge "indoor" ohne indoor erfasst https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:indoor | |
| 5 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | seichter ♦65 | Die Erfassung erfolgte einige Jahre vor dem Wiki-Eintrag für indoor (englisch: 2015, deutsch 2021). Entstand nach dem damaligen Stand von simple indoor mapping. | |
| 4978146 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11763083943/history room ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:indoor |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | windharp ♦524 | Ja, die steht im Parkhaus drin. Hab schon mal ne Weile gesucht :-) | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | reopened | windharp ♦524 | ||
| 4978145 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Should be an area https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1916649709/history Any shop here ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:indoor%3Dshop |
| 4978143 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Sollte auffindbar sein https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553738165/history |
| 4978140 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Sollte auffindbar sein https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553679864/history |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Moepmoep ♦2,253 | ||
| 4978139 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Sollte auffindbar sein https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553679867/history |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Moepmoep ♦2,253 | Was ist der Sinn dieses Hinweises? | |
| 4978138 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Auffindbarkeit https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553620797/history |
| 4978137 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Der hat Öffnungszeiten ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553620797/history |
| 4978136 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Sollte auffindbar sein https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553700036/history |
| 4769893 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Should have a 16 km diameter https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2086007526 |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | GeeMaps! ♦2,773 | Not mappable | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Why not ? Here's a 20km example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063229590 | |
| 5 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | GeeMaps! ♦2,773 | Please feel free to map it in that case! | |
| 6 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Sure, if I'd know the exact dimensions. There's even no name | |
| 2012029 | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Probably a rental shop with different vehicles offered ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ashop%3Drental |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | wowstacie ♦136 | ||
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Still not clear what it offers https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5017258325 | |
| 4519844 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | windharp ♦524 | Neu gebaute Mehrfamilienhäuser via StreetComplete 59.3 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | windharp ♦524 | Benachbartes Haus angepasst, die hier fehlen in den Luftbildern noch. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Umrisse eingezeichnet | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | windharp ♦524 | Adressen ergänzt, kann dann wohl zu | |
| 5 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Hatte neulich gesehen dass die in der Mitte verbunden sind (anders als auf dem Luftbild) | |
| 6 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Muss nochmal genau nachsehen | |
| 4966767 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | No building visible on satellite picture, should be an area https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11333732252 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | tbo47 ♦2,366 | I removed the hotel | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | tbo47 ♦2,366 | ||
| 4850975 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | --- | Momentan besteht die Spreuerhofstraße aus 3 einzelnen Linien. Sollte man diese Linien zu einer einzigen Kombinieren? |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | chris2map ♦752 | Das wäre nicht zwingend nötig, ist hier aber auch gar nicht möglich: Der schmale Abschnitt hat andere Attribute wie der Rest. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Macht der einzelne Knoten hier Sinn ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3686416098 | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | limes11 ♦8,946 | Da tourism=attraction bereits am way hängt, kann der Knoten weg. Zudem ist hier zum Teil bicycle/horse=no erfasst - Gibt es dafür Beschilderungen ? Dann wäre hw=footway die bessere Wahl. | |
| 5 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Wie kommst Du auf den schmalen Pfad ? ;-) https://www.dieweltenbummler.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Spreuerhofstra%C3%9Fe-in-Reutlingen.jpg width=0.31 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/417619920 macht es selbst Leuten mit nur leichtem Übergewicht unmöglich, das als footway zu verwenden. Geschweige denn Pferde oder Fahrräder. highway=building_gap käme in etwa hin ;-) | |
| 4961908 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | What is monitored ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12245904870 , see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=weather%3A |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | And https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=monitoring: | |
| 4961837 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Shouldn't be a node only https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2086015938/history, looks something like this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sudbury_Basin_Non-Ferrous_Metals_-_Eastern_Canada_map.png |
| 3472521 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | DarkTranquility ♦173 | Unable to answer "What kind of building is this?" for https://osm.org/way/52872777 via StreetComplete 49.2: Dieses Haus und das Haus in dem daneben Ernstings Family ist, sind ein großes Haus |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | tjum ♦407 | Stimmt... kann ich aber am Handy auch nicht schnell ändern. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | tjum ♦407 | Jetzt fällt mir erst auf, dass das zwei Hausnummern sind und die "zwei" Häuser wahrscheinlich deswegen getrennt eingezeichnet wurden. Außerdem sieht die Rückseite seltsam aus. Da muss nochmal jemand hinten nachschauen, insbesondere welche Hausnummern am Treppenhaus dranstehen. Ich lass es jetzt doch mal vorerst, wie es ist. | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | tjum ♦407 | Ok... - es ist nur ein Gebäude - es hat zwei Hausnummern am selben Eingang - Den Haken zum Haus 13/1 gibt es nicht Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/303735.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/303736.jpg | |
| 5 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Theoretisch sollte das hier abrufbar sein, habe aber das download-Menü nicht gefunden. Per email angefragt https://www.lgl-bw.de/Produkte/Liegenschaftskataster/Hausumringe Reutlingen verlinkt dazu nur auf Landesdaten https://www.reutlingen.de/geoportal/Open-Data, allerdings gibt es scheinbar vereinzelt engagierte Mitarbeiter : https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Sachgebiet%20GIS%20-%20Stadt%20Reutlingen | |
| 4944771 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | anc25 ♦2 | "previous office ceased to exist" OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-22T03:20:49Z POI name: Linksjugend ['solid] Reutlingen POI types: office internet_access-wlan #CoMaps android |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Nehme an, den Kommentar kann man schliessen ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7434714570/history | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | map per ♦6,066 | @anc25: Danke für die Änderung in OpenStreetMap! | |
| 4784784 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | --- | Sportplatz (Indoor) |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | ti-lo ♦618 | Eher ein Fitnesscenter https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4091248025 | |
| 4694978 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | 2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | waterced ♦4,458 | This one seems valid, right ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dmodel_runway | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Depends. If you understand "valid" as "traditionally used", yes https://taghistory.raifer.tech/?#***/aeroway/model_runway. But it doesn't make sense to "invent" (another) way of tagging for every vehicle type, so it would be better to keep things such as *:*=runway (or *:*=launchpad). Which may be achieved using a namespace https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway | |
| 4854362 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Tourism_info ♦103 | Where are Launch Complex-0. Launch Complex-1 ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiki_Multi-Purpose_Aerospace_Park |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Here's 0 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910751415 1 isn't mapped yet. But where's the spaceport area, the whole aerodrome ? https://hokkaidospaceport.com/en/facilities/ | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | It seems they eye an expansion https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/firefly-aerospace-eyes-japan-rocket-launches-asia-market-2025-08-18/ | |
| 4911509 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Is this here ? https://africanspaceagency.org/contact-us/ |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | NadaSharaby ♦503 | ||
| 3817843 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | --- | no information found about any "spaceport" plans |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Apparently this site https://turdef.com/article/roketsan-establishes-mini-satellite-launch-facility | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Infrastructure still missing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414427251 | |
| 4676674 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Unclear which kind of infrastructure, aeroway:uav=launchpad ? Should not only be a node, but an area https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3Auav |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12183946356 | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Syntax updated https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3Auav , but the area is still unclear | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | maps4junkies ♦119 | ||
| 5 | ~ 9 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 6 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | As of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1410717288, seems to be aeroway:drone https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Drones,_UAV | |
| 7 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | maps4junkies ♦119 | Thank you. | |
| 4892195 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Is there anything launched ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12999689983 otherwise, I'd recommend tower:type=rocket_engine_test + https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/industrial=rocket_engine_test for the pad |
| 4888499 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | The website looks as if it's paragliding https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asport%3Dparagliding https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7682394 |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | ti-lo ♦618 | Adjusted https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3Aparagliding | |
| 4888893 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | What happens here ? Takeoff / landing ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhanggliding |
| 4887559 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | I doubt there's anything launched here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/989246921/history |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | ❤️🔥 ♦4,828 | The LINZ Topo maps still include this feature (https://osm.org/node/1225232066/history/1 ) despite this recent news article: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/534909/plans-to-build-rocket-launchpads-at-kaitorete-spit-fail-to-get-off-the-ground maybe it's just disused:* ? | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Yes, at least disused "Her statement did not mention rocket launches", but there seems to be a runway instead of a launch pad ? https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/525932/plans-for-spaceport-at-kaitorete-spit-in-strife-as-government-rejects-further-funding | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | ❤️🔥 ♦4,828 | yeah.... maybe the future plans have no connection to this disused patch of asphalt from over 14 years ago? | |
| 5 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | The you should rename and possibly re-shape it https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/989246921/history/1 --> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Drunway | |
| 6 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | ❤️🔥 ♦4,828 | 👍 done | |
| 4887560 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Could someone please verify whether this belongs to Andoya Spaceport ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372369263/history |
| 4775309 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Unclear why there's one "relation" which could be a closed line https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834314800 and then a second identical one with a "hole" for "PNMCC" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757096806 |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | O Fim ♦3,113 | ?????? como se mapeia | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | I assume this one may be deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834314800 but don't understand what this should be : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757096806 (doesn't look like a part of a crater, such as an island or inner rim). There are some examples here : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:geological%3Dmeteor_crater#Why_and_when_to_use_a_multipolygon | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | danctc ♦6,228 | ||
| 4755428 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | There's a description for "balloon tagging" : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4683400091/history |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | mont1 ♦46 | ||
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | Please check the fixme. Seems this isn't used any more : A partir de fin octobre 2019 les vols ne seront plus effectués depuis l’Ariège et la Haute-Garonne. Les décollages auront lieu dans le secteur d’Eauze (Bas-Armagnac) | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | K12230LF ♦20,505 | So this needs to be removed ? | |
| 5 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | I think so, as long as it isn't "le secteur d’Eauze (Bas-Armagnac)" | |
| 4873343 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Wo ist das genau ? https://neura-robotics.com/neura-electronics/ |
| 4755434 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | There's a description for "balloon tagging" : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278364435 |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | AlexSpritze ♦1,917 | Okay, this way is already `aeroway=balloon`. Is it enough already? | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Which kind of balloon aeroway ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3Aballoon | |
| 4870217 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | The airport is mapped twice : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/999212029/history , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29483207 |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | Hypsometric ♦4,425 | They are different airports with the same name. Both are mapped correctly. See ADIP: https://adip.faa.gov/agis/public/#/simpleAirportMap/7B9 https://adip.faa.gov/agis/public/#/simpleAirportMap/EFD | |
| 4694935 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | Im Fokus ♦2,101 | Tu dir keinn Zwang an | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Im Fokus ♦2,101 | Was spricht denn gegen 'model_runway' in Analogie zu 'runway' für die Verkehrsflugzeuge? Dass 'Aerodrome' bedeutender klingt? | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Ich nehme an, Du sprichst davon, das als Wert und nicht als suffix auszudrücken, dass es sich um "model" handelt ? 1) Als suffix ist das filtern (hier : nach allen "modell-relevanten") einfacher, gleiches gilt für andere "Verkehrsmittel". 2) Keine neuen Werte (pro "Verkehrsmittel") erfinden, sondern die "angestammten" weiter verwenden. Also hier *=runway aeroway:model_aerodrome könnte im suffix natürlich auch nur "model", "aeromodeling" o.ä. heissen, "model_aerodrome" ist aber derzeit der "etabierte" Ausdruck | |
| 5 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Im Fokus ♦2,101 | danke zunächst mal für Deinen Beitrag. Was mich irritiert ist, dass Du mehrfach von "suffix" unter Bezugnahme auf "model" schreibst, da dieser Wortbestandteil in "model_runway" oder "model_aerodrome" ja als Praefix fungiert. Mit Filterung hab' ich allerdings nichts am Hut, insofern soll's mir recht sein, wenn Du wegen besserer Suchergebnisse auf einen der bisher weniger benutzten Schlüsselwerte wechselst. Wolltest Du Dir mit diesem Hinweis einen Überblick über die Akzeptanz einer solchen Aktion verschaffen? Bisher hat außer mir leider niemand reagiert (was leider häufig passiert) | |
| 6 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Ganz genau, wollte die Auseinandersetzung mit dem Thema in der "Praxis" erreichen anstatt über Theoretiker-Runden. Mein Hauptinteresse sind die "anderen Verkehrsmittel". Dort wurde die Differenzierung notwendig aufgrund der Verwendung z.B. von aeroway=launchpad für Ballons, Hobby- oder Forschungsraketen | |
| 7 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Beim WERT spricht man nicht von "prefix/suffix", Bsp. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/aeroway=model_runway, nur beim "Schlüssel" (die Angaben vor dem =) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namespace | |
| 8 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Im Fokus ♦2,101 | Na, dann toi, toi, toi, dass sich noch ein paar Leute hier äußern. | |
| 9 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Im Fokus ♦2,101 | Still ruht der See. Deshalb die Frage: muss dieser Hinweis weiter bestehen bleiben? | |
| 10 | ~ 29 days ago | closed | Im Fokus ♦2,101 | Wie heißt es so treffend: Keine Antwort ist auch eine Antwort. Deshalb nach mehr als einem Jahr ohne weiteren Beitrag zu diesem Thema: un finale amichevole | |
| 4694928 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | mcliquid ♦8,608 | Wie würde man diese Notiz lösen können? | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Indem man https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1333207568 umbenennt in aeroway:model_aerodrome=runway, z.B.. Daher auch der Link auf den Namensraum https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle (damit man auch die anderen sieht) | |
| 4 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | mcliquid ♦8,608 | Das verlinkte Proposal wurde nie akzeptiert. Das bisherige "aeroway=model_runway" hat 753 Nutzungen gegenüber nur 18 Nutzungen bei aeroway:model_aerodrome=runway. Somit hat das bisherige Tagging-Schema die fast 42-fache Nutzung. Der aeroway:-Namespace ist für reguläre Luftfahrtinfrastruktur reserviert. Die Einführung von Modellflugplätzen innerhalb dieses Schemas wirkt künstlich und inkonsistent. Und wenn man einmal aeroway:model_* akzeptiert, müsste man ggf. auch railway:model_*, waterway:model_*, etc. einführen. Das führt zu einer Fragmentierung der Struktur. Wieso sollte man das deutlich etabliertere Tagging gegen ein nicht akzeptiertes Proposal austauschen? | |
| 5 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Wie gesagt, der Link auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway sollte eigentlich verdeutlichen, warum aeroway:*=* Sinn machen würde. Die "Millionen Fliegen können nicht irren"-Argumentation hat mir noch nie eingeleuchtet. Ebenso wie das herumreiten auf proposals. An dem Beispiel sieht man mal wieder, was dabei heraus kommt. "Der Rest der Welt" wird einfach ausgeblendet. | |
| 6 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | mcliquid ♦8,608 | Ich verstehe deinen Punkt, dass Nutzungszahlen allein nicht alles sind und dass Innovation manchmal außerhalb formeller Proposals entsteht. Trotzdem ist es wichtig, innerhalb der OSM-Community möglichst konsistente und nachvollziehbare Strukturen zu fördern. Der aeroway:-Namensraum ist bislang primär für reale Luftfahrtinfrastruktur vorgesehen. Wenn wir nun modellbezogene Objekte in denselben Namensraum verschieben, ohne dass dafür ein klarer Konsens besteht, riskieren wir semantische Unklarheiten – insbesondere für Datenverbraucher, die keine Trennung zwischen realer und modellhafter Infrastruktur erwarten. Vielleicht wäre es sinnvoll, das Thema nochmal im Forum oder auf der Tagging-Mailingliste aufzugreifen, um eine breitere Diskussion anzustoßen? Möchtest du die Notiz etwa so lange offen lassen, bis wie durch ein Wunder ein Konsens zustande kommt? | |
| 7 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | Tourism_info ♦103 | Ich dachte eher an "mit den Füssen abstimmen". Aber bring's ruhig im Forum an, bin gespannt ob etwas konstruktives dabei heraus kommt. Bei Fahrzeugwerten jedenfalls nicht, und das seit einer Dekade | |
| 8 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | mcliquid ♦8,608 | Dann stimme ich mit den Füßen ab 😉 | |
| 4032293 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | "300' diameter concrete launch pad located just west of our massive runway that may be utilized for vertical take-offs and landings" (not found on ID satellite picture) https://www.faa.gov/space/spaceports_by_state#ok_os https://airspaceportok.com/ |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | cuzi ♦7,367 | It is visible on aerial imagery now | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | ti-lo ♦618 | Added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1409210239 | |
| 4 | ~ 10 months ago | reopened | kurazraree | ||
| 5 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | kurazraree | ||
| 4809292 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | dish and observatory should be separate ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687150977 |
| 4809284 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Probably the telescope ? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/telescope%3Atype, there's already an "observatory" : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148682566 |
| 3571377 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Alice-Salomon-Haus https://www.swp.de/lokales/reutlingen/studieren-in-reutlingen-neues-studierendenwohnheim_-so-sieht-das-alice-salomon-haus-von-innen-aus-69257395.html building=dormitory https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:campus (Umrisse unklar) |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | windharp ♦524 | Gezeichnet habe ich es nun, Wegführung auch, Details zum Haus fehlen | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | windharp ♦524 | ||
| 4 | ~ 10 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 5 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | ti-lo ♦618 | Details ergänzt | |
| 3878280 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | --- | This part of Krämerstrasse should be marked too narrow for long trucks with trailers because of parking cars. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | söm4324 ♦3,536 | Ist die Straße mittels Schildern für solche LKW gesperrt? Oder ist die Durchfahrtsbreite bekannt? Dann könnte man das eintragen, onst nicht. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Hier die Beschilderung Stand 2018 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.493132699971994&lng=9.216489499972113&z=19.9&pKey=501220084645031&focus=photo. Durchfahrtsbreite ist selbst für einen PKW + entgegen kommendes Fahrrad zu knapp | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Ups, in der Strasse verrutscht. Hier die richtige : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.4950216&lng=9.2166648999722&z=17.013419051928082&pKey=512341146454348&focus=photo | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | söm4324 ♦3,536 | Danke, dann sagt die Beschilderung nichts über eine Einfahrtsbeschränkung aus. Dann könnte ev. nur noch die Breite der Fahrbahn zwischen den Markierungen gemessen und eingetragen werden (maxwidth:physical) | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | So würde ich die aktuelle Beschreibung nicht interpretieren. Bei einem temporären Parkverbot wäre ja durchaus Platz für einen Schwertransport https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxwidth:physical | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | söm4324 ♦3,536 | Welche Möglichkeit gäbe es noch, die (normalerweise) schmale Durchfahrt für LKW zu markieren? | |
| 8 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Ich würde das als lane:width bezeichnen, scheint aber derzeit nicht vorgesehen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:lanes#Enge_Stra%C3%9Fen. Für cycleway allerdings in Verwendung https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=lane%3Awidth | |
| 9 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | söm4324 ♦3,536 | Hab die Frage mal ins Forum gegeben: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/einggeschrankte-durchfahrtsbreite-fur-lkw/131851/1 | |
| 10 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | windharp ♦524 | Laut Diskussion erfolgt keine Änderung | |
| 4779639 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | deprecated tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358802485/history, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Anatural%3Dcrater |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | there are "some" more in the vicinity https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/252m | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | OddlyAngled ♦447 | there are duplicates too - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358802485 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1280139946 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Valley_Caldera has details on this area | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | IMHO both should be replaced by an area https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CalderaRelief_large.png and tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dvolcanic_caldera_rim | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Respectively https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:volcano:type%3Dlava_dome (for the "inner ring" | |
| 4689700 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Is this a tethered balloon at the edge of the station ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7161118322 >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:balloon:launch%3Dmonitoring |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | os-emmer ♦525 | The aerial imagery is unclear. Dou you have additional information about the situation or are you requesting local survey? | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Other knowledge of the situation (what is measured with which kind of balloon in which height) would also be fine. The original entry just says "Weather Station Balloon Launch Site" - could be tethered or a launch up to the stratosphere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aballoon%3Alaunch%3Dmonitoring#Examples | |
| 3768648 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Cheggrvomneggr | Haupteingang ist ebenerdig. Nebeneingang hat ein Stufe >7cm höhe, die ja aber nicht benutzt werden muss. Zwei Rollstuhlplätz. Der in Kino 1 zu schräg >8% und für große Rollis zu klein. Man kann nicht drehen. Kino 4 wird noch getestet! |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | ti-lo ♦618 | Cheggrvomneggr auf die bestehenden Einträge https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49591794/history und Wheelmap-Option hingewiesen https://wheelmap.org/way/49591794 | |
| 3566233 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | --- | Psychiatrie / Klinik |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | ti-lo ♦618 | Updated https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91911848/history | |
| 4769695 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Name is missing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological=meteor_crater |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | 7 names, to be precise https://umap.openstreetmap.de/en/map/meteor-craters_94040#17/52.49030/16.89507 | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | ti-lo ♦618 | remapped | |
| 4769818 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | According to wikipedia, the elevation is "1,719 m above sea level" (+45 m rim) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9586720 and the crater floor 170 m below ? When clarified, the crater:age=50 kya could also be added. Why are there two "meteor crater" ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11222109 + https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9586720 |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Also see https://umap.openstreetmap.de/en/map/meteor-craters_94040#16/35.0269/-111.0264 | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | ti-lo ♦618 | deleted the additional one | |
| 4775116 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | "Mount Éboulements (Mont des Éboulements) is considered the central rebound of the Earth's crust following moments after the meteor impact" --> (part of a) crater ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:geological%3Dmeteor_crater |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | As of wikipedia : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_%C3%89boulements | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | Martin868 ♦3,896 | ||
| 4775041 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Crater https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198153360 could be joined with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198153361/history into a relation, as according to Wikipedia from the same impact |
| 2069492 | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Opening hours are missing, couldn't find a website |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | notmyproblem1 ♦832 | I think it's illegal to not have Opening Hours in the shop written. Does this still exist after 5 years? | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | I don't think it's mandatory. At least the tourism page of Oulx still lists it https://turismo-oulx.it/territorio/dove-mangiare/ristoranti/la-barrica | |
| 3609030 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | literan ♦82,707 | что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | те же факты, что и в случае с https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3609034 | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием. | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»? | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации | |
| 3609028 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | literan ♦82,707 | что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | те же факты, что и в случае с https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3609034 | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием. | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»? | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации | |
| 3609036 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | literan ♦82,707 | что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием. | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»? | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации | |
| 3609032 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | literan ♦82,707 | что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | те же факты, что и в случае с https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3609034 | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием. | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»? | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации | |
| 3609026 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | literan ♦82,707 | что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | те же факты, что и в случае с https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3609034 | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием. | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»? | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации | |
| 3609034 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | literan ♦82,707 | что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Это дифференциация стартовых площадок https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318838929/history см https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=launchpad#values. вышестоящая единица - космопорт https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6721734 | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Также см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:aeroway#%D0%A1%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8B | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | сравнить с https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/317711 launchpads - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/24wU | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | похожие https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316967069 launchpads - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/24x0 | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | literan ♦82,707 | так что конкретно исправить или добавить в базу надо? | |
| 8 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Будь то военные стартовые площадки или площадки для космических путешествий. Те, что находятся на космодромах, обычно называются аэродромами. Также можно использовать aeroway:military=launchpad или aeroway:research=launchpad (если они не отправляются на орбиту, а предназначены для исследований). | |
| 9 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Стартовые площадки в США или Китае также называются «aeroway», если они находятся на военных объектах, но предназначены для полетов в космос. См. примеры выше | |
| 10 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | literan ♦82,707 | еще раз: Что неверно здесь отмечено? что нужно исправить? Я вас не понимаю | |
| 11 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Я не могу сказать, правильно это или нет, я спрашиваю о статусе. Что было непонятно в примерах? | |
| 12 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием. | |
| 13 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 14 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»? | |
| 15 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации | |
| 3609035 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | literan ♦82,707 | что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | те же факты, что и в случае с https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3609034 | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием. | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | В какой момент следует задавать «вопросы о статусе»? | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | в какой хотите момент и кому хотите, только не в заметках. Не надо переоткрывать заметки, не несущие полезной информации | |
| 4767469 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Welche Art von Krater ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1531693644, Alternativen siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | lapoga17 ♦609 | Welcher Krater genau ist gemeint? | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Naja, der verlinkte https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1531693644. Unklar was für eine Art von "Krater" das sein soll | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | lapoga17 ♦609 | Das könnte einer der seltenen Irrtümer von fkv sein. Am Pauliberg gibt es keinen Krater. Ein Sekundärkrater entsteht bei einem Einschlagereignis. Das scheidet aus. | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Evtl. das ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dsinkhole | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | lapoga17 ♦609 | Sinkhole ist so etwas wie Doline. Pauliberg ist Basalt und wäscht nicht aus so wie Kalk. Es gibt allerdings die Vierlöcherhöhle, die ist eingezeichnet. Das ganze Gebiet ist ein großer Tagbau der einen Krater, so jemals existent, eliminiert hat. | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Dann einfach löschen ? fkv scheint seit 2 Jahren nicht mehr aktiv zu sein, können wir schlecht fragen ? | |
| 8 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | lapoga17 ♦609 | fkv ist leider verstorben. Ich lösche den Punkt. | |
| 4770770 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | There are two entries for the same crater https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6984516667 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198170990/history |
| 3367850 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/faculty=geography ? |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | Phil Prinsloo | ||
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | Phil Prinsloo | ||
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | Phil Prinsloo | ||
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | What's the "resolution" ? | |
| 7 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | Phil Prinsloo | ||
| 4769911 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Further info missing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11314392009, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dmeteor_crater |
| 4769869 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | This should be an area with a 55km diameter https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2085932144 |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | AndersAndersson ♦903 | It is like that now. | |
| 4769787 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Gemäss Wikipedia nur eine Theorie ? Ggf. ungefähren Umkreis einzeichnen, sofern neue Erkenntnisse vorliegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3115121276/history |
| 4769703 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Shouldn't be a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2006086754 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological=meteor_crater. Only one occurrence of crater:exposed https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=crater%3Aexposed (no idea what it should mean) |
| 4769580 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | most likely a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dvolcanic_vent |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | kabelhaai ♦2,483 | Mapped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167536459 | |
| 4769578 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | most likely a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dvolcanic_vent |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Alex0933elzurdo | A=§ | |
| 4767487 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Most likely a sinkhole ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358797513/history , see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,255 | possible that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9530375419 is technically the same object?! But yeah this object is tagged badly as it stands. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,255 | BTW, name came from USGS/GNIS most likely and probably could be left for now. Actually I'm not sure what to do with this as I'm not a geologist. Is this an extinct volcano or an impact crater? I'm currently guessing a volcano. | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Asked iandees (who created it 16 years ago) | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,255 | think the number of impact craters are lower than number of volcanoes, I suspect if it can't be checked with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_impact_structures_on_Earth it's probably a volcano? | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | The wikipedia article looks quite detailed, but I think the combination of OSM and "text" info is the "real thing". So some "local" should give the input what it is. If the origin should not be determined, this could also be tagged | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | OddlyAngled ♦447 | it is a pit crater https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_crater | |
| 8 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | OddlyAngled ♦447 | I'm not sure what the proper tag is for it, sinkhole or caldera, but I removed the dupe and went with sinkhole. please reopen this if you have a better suggestion. | |
| 9 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | gpserror ♦12,255 | The only thing I have a concern with as a sink hole is that the topology looks like it goes up and then goes down. If I'm reading it right, the rim goes up to around 5700ft and then sinks down to 5520ft but not exactly...elevation seems to continue to go up as you go east. To the northwest it's downhill... Should a sinkhole have a rim? | |
| 10 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | OddlyAngled ♦447 | yeah I am not sure either, it also doesn’t seem like a volcano even though it is volcanic. anyone else have an opinion? | |
| 4767494 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Which kind of crater ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357349420/history, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,255 | probably related to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9695603018 | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Pretty sure, but should be consolidated with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569716850 (and not several nodes). Probably an "outer" and an "inner" crater ? "Crater Lake details" indicates there's natural=water in the middle ? Also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=crater | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Wikipedia says "a volcanic crater about 150 m wide and 30 m deep...which now contains a Crater Lake" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wizard_Island | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,255 | So volcano... I think the number of verifiable impact craters are lower than number of confirmed volcano craters so I think it might be safe to assume this is a volcano. | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Certainly, this wasn't the question. Just the way of tagging it (inner & outer circle or how) ? | |
| 7 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦838 | time to ask in another forum. | |
| 4767473 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Which type of crater ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12757140172, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | K12230LF ♦20,505 | Have you asked directly the person that added that crater ? It is very unlikely that your note will be answered otherwise | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Similar to the before mentioned, occasional mapper https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jeandive. And YOU answered ;-) | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | K12230LF ♦20,505 | I did because I think that this note will remain opened for years. Why did you choose those two items and not for example a postbox that did not have a reference or an hotel without opening_hours ? | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | I really care more about hotels (or others) without opening_hours, but stumbled on craters (as a "hole" ;-)) via https://spacey.space/@spaceflight/114535245443506671 | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | To simply tag a hole is outdated https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater (not my idea, but makes sense) | |
| 7 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | K12230LF ♦20,505 | If we open this area with IGN MNT LIDAR HD with see that this crater seems to be related to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/873727748/history So maybe we can transform this into an area instead of a single point ? | |
| 4767474 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Which type ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6350491514, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | K12230LF ♦20,505 | Have you asked directly the person that added that crater ? It is very unlikely that your note will be answered otherwise | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | It usually depends on the time of the entry whether I ask directly or leave a note. In this case the original mapper doesn't seem to be very active https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bunny-Le-Lub | |
| 4 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | GeorgeKaplan ♦26,165 | Nonetheless, you have higher probability to get an answer when asking in the changeset. BTW, the original mapper has contributed very recently. | |
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | K12230LF ♦20,505 | now natural=volcano | |
| 3609033 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | military or civilian ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | literan ♦82,707 | что конкретно нужно исправить в базе? заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках и недостатках | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | те же факты, что и в случае с https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3609034 | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | literan ♦82,707 | Заметки не предназначены для вопросов. Заметки предназначены для сообщений об ошибках в данных либо для предоставления дополнительной информации для внесения в карту. Ознакомьтесь: osm.wiki/Notes "Спрашивать о статусах" следует в других местах. Если у вас нет информации для внесения в карту, заметки я закрываю в связи с их нецелевым использованием. | |
| 4767468 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Shouldn't be a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11700640827, correct tagging : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ageological%3Dvolcanic_caldera_rim |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Hugoren Martinako ♦6,337 | Done | |
| 4767508 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | There's an outer https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227647624 and an inner section, please check : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834317236/history |
| 4767496 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Most likely a volcano ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/359258391/history https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater |
| 4767484 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | tag outdated https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5260821225/history, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | Carlos Martin Noriega ♦1,207 | Updated. This is the entrance to the cenote cave. | |
| 4767479 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Which kind of crater ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293252784, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater |
| 4767478 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Doesn't seem very "natural" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314049193, probably https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/historic=crash_site or crash_crater ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater |
| 4767471 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Welche Art ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1452292755, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcrater |
| 4767466 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | No English description found for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112185745, see https://ceb.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_East_Crater |
| 4767422 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Should be an area ? |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | tmpl trce ♦50 | converted node into area with same tags. | |
| 4682955 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Last launch 2017 ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxus_(rocket) >> disused ? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Fjellrev ♦2,056 | I would not set any of the launchpads to disused without proper control on the ground before doing so. Why? According to their website https://sscspace.com/esrange/ Esrange operates 4 permanent launchers in this complex and this is the number that is mapped right now. Getting up to date information for outsiders may be more difficult than before in these times... | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | There are now two "LC-3", but the spaceport area is unclear https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291715881 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439539132 | |
| 4766042 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Where is their launch infrastructure ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8807980194 |
| 3843042 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Looks quite different here : https://consultation.shetlandspacecentre.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/60617516-ACM-XX-00-DR-CE-0071-2-min-scaled.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | ti-lo ♦618 | Link doesn't work any more | |
| 4765969 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Is most likely here : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4665893 |
| 3573044 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | This should be an area, not a node : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7467035954 |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | There's another "spaceport" around this one : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174778130 Also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dspaceport | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | ti-lo ♦618 | Is now an area https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18022920/history | |
| 4755032 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | --- | Baink shofehulla chowdhory baink |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | ti-lo ♦618 | not translateable | |
| 4765950 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Should have a name https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376717974/history |
| 4765924 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31490791 - "As of 2023, the investors have called off the project, and the property is on sale", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceport_Camden#History |
| 4765890 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Should have a name : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027553277/history |
| 4765889 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Should have a name : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376713053/history |
| 4765885 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Should be integrated to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569433118 (if verified that correct) |
| 4689582 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | no idea what "model_sport:electric" should mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8090898440 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | fortera_au ♦191 | Looks to be from a proposal to increase the scope of model_aerodrome. Not sure if it would apply in this case, but sport=rc_car could be a good option if someone has more details on the club itself to confirm. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | This would already exist : https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/sport=rc_car | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | fortera_au ♦191 | I meant that tag may suit that node if someone has more details about that specific club. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | closed | CloCkWeRX ♦4,393 | Remote control car race track | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | reopened | ti-lo ♦618 | ||
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Drc_car + https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dmotor | |
| 8 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | nrs19 ♦30 | Radio Racing Cars SA Inc https://rrcsa.org.au/ | |
| 9 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | ti-lo ♦618 | Does this apply to the whole area ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27631389 | |
| 10 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | nrs19 ♦30 | No. The radio-controlled model cars use the track in the northern part, which is fenced. In the southern part, there is a BMZ bike track. | |
| 11 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | GeeMaps! ♦2,773 | added: changeset #: 172092523 | |
| 4755806 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | Wo ist das eigentliche Weingut ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:craft%3Dwinery |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Moepmoep ♦2,253 | Kannst Du präzisieren, was ein "eigentliches Weingut" ist? Die Wirtschaftsgebäude, in denen der Wein hergestellt wird? Der Verkaufsraum? Die Fläche mit den Gebäuden? Mit oder ohne Hotel? Der Weinberg? Das Gebäude, an dem das Schild "Weingut" hängt? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Moepmoep ♦2,253 | Fragesteller ist auf unbestimmte Zeit gesperrt und wird hier nicht mehr antworten. | |
| 4755440 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | There's a description for "balloon tagging" : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373320167 |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | Welshie ♦1,714 | tagged, I think | |
| 4755436 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | There's a description for "balloon tagging" : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6501798198 |
| 4755431 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | There's a description for "balloon tagging" : osm.wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4974008060/history |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦33,692 | update https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4974008060 | |
| 4755424 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | ti-lo ♦618 | There's a description for "balloon tagging" : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons |