osmidal for the last 12 monthsosmidal for the last 12 months| Note | # | Tmstmp UTC | Event | Contributor | Comment | Auto-translation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4156213 | 1 | 2024-03-16 22:07 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Some tracks here are mapped as paths. Needs checking on the ground and re-tagging. | |
| 2 | 2024-11-12 17:06 | commented | Tino T ♦115 | Could you elaborate a bit more on what should be changed? I can gladly go check some of the paths. | ||
| 3 | 2024-11-12 17:11 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | `highway=path` (or `footway`) to `highway=track`. Regards! | ||
| 4 | 2024-11-12 17:11 | reopened | osmidal ♦215 | |||
| 5 | 2024-11-12 17:11 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Oh, and thanks for your effort! Do you live there, or are you on holiday, or other? | ||
| 6 | 2024-11-12 20:56 | commented | Tino T ♦115 | Ok, I will check on the weekend. I am on the island 2 to 3 months a year. | ||
| 7 | 2025-10-10 09:18 | closed | GiovanniPen ♦417 | already fixed | ||
| 8 | 2025-10-10 09:23 | reopened | osmidal ♦215 | |||
| 9 | 2025-10-10 09:23 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | It's still a path, not a track. | ||
| 10 | 2025-10-10 09:33 | commented | GiovanniPen ♦417 | "È il più indicato per i percorsi in ambiente naturale." | ||
| 11 | 2025-10-10 09:35 | commented | GiovanniPen ♦417 | following "Path examples" from osm wiki | ||
| 12 | 2025-10-19 11:07 | commented | Tino T ♦115 | It's a track, IMHO. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/311516.jpg | ||
| 13 | 2025-10-19 18:17 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Exactly. It is a track, and connected to the "road" network for service vehicles. I have even seen one service vehicle up there (not exactly at this spot). | ||
| 14 | 2025-10-19 20:17 | closed | Tino T ♦115 | Ok, I've changed this one and the other one to track. | ||
| 4934822 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-08-28 17:36 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Does this "sport=gymnastics" really has the _name_ "Barren", and not that it is just a category (needing other tagging)? | |
| 2 | 2025-10-28 21:00 | closed | Kay Klotzsche ♦304 | Have tagged this now as Parallelbarren using leisure=fitness_station and fitness_station=Parallel_bars | ||
| 4934821 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-08-28 17:35 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Is "place=locality" really a correct tag for this? And is "Randgrube" _really_ a _name_ of this thing (and not just a category)? I doubt, but I have no 100% definite knowledge. Maybe someone can check and maybe fix. | |
| 4930724 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-08-26 09:27 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | The tower is named "Borgmannturm", the map is named "Bergmannturm". It seems that one of them is a typo and should be adapted? I don't know what is correct -- when I wrote the note I was not there but just looked at the map. Regards! | |
| 4927021 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-24 11:05 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Here ("left" and "right" from this note) are two mointains named "Bradlo". Is this really correct? Or should they have different names? | |
| 4927019 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-24 11:05 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Only German name ("Gratsteig") for this path was given by original mapper (I did only "correct" it to move the name to the `name:de=`-key). Need to add name in local language (Czech). | |
| 4926199 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-23 19:35 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Name of this path is given in German ("Plangassl"), but not the local language (which is Czech). | |
| 2 | 2025-08-24 10:27 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Moved the German name to key `name:de`. Need to add name in official local language (Czech) to `name`-key. | ||
| 4926198 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-23 19:35 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Name of this path is given in German ("Katzengrund"), but not the local language (which is Czech). | |
| 2 | 2025-08-24 10:27 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Moved the German name to key `name:de`. Need to add name in official local language (Czech) to `name`-key. | ||
| 4926942 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-24 10:27 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Only German name ("Tannoppe") for this mountain was given by original mapper (I did only "correct" it to move the name to the `name:de=`-key). Need to add name in local language (Czech). | |
| 4926943 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-24 10:27 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Only German name ("Dürre Koppe") for this mountain was given by original mapper (I did only "correct" it to move the name to the `name:de=`-key). Need to add name in local language (Czech). | |
| 4926941 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-24 10:27 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Only German name ("Reichberg") for this mountain was given by original mapper (I did only "correct" it to move the name to the `name:de=`-key). Need to add name in local language (Czech). | |
| 4926196 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-23 19:34 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | This path could not be found at the lower end (there is only another path that branches more to the west). Check if it really still exists, or if it should be deleted. | |
| 4926195 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-23 19:34 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Resuvey exact course of this path (only guessed), and continue it's course. | |
| 4710367 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-14 13:33 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Here goes a path trough the small forest/ park. | |
| 2 | 2025-08-01 11:50 | commented | Rhoon ♦3,833 | aus luftbild nicht erkennbar, keine digitalisierungsgrundlage. bitte gps track o.ä. anfügen | ||
| 3 | 2025-08-01 14:01 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | This was meant as a note for further on-site mapping. Mapping from aerial photography can only help if it is actually verified on the ground by the person who maps, because that photography can be outdated and often is unclear to interpret. Also, I did not record coordinate tracks. Note is left open until on-the-ground mapping happens :-). | ||
| 4 | 2025-08-13 12:59 | commented | arakel ♦36 | The land belongs to the state capital Dresden. Parcels are leased for weekend properties. I know the area, I live nearby. It may be possible to get through there, but it is not a path in that sense. I am not in favor of mapping every shortcut, especially since it offers no added value there and may disturb the tenants. This path is not included on any local hiking map, and I am sure that passage is undesirable. I suggest closing this issue. | ||
| 5 | 2025-08-13 13:17 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Ahoj @arakel, your comment is understandable, but against the "official" way how OSM should work. You can read more about that at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property * Mapping "what is on the ground", * if something is restricted, add corresponding tags like`access=private` or `informal=yes`. Since this is a "forest" and public land ("state capital Dresden"), there even should exist official right of access. As I understand the general way how OSM works, this issue should _not_ be closed because of your reasoning. Regards and thanks for the contribution! | ||
| 6 | 2025-08-13 13:45 | commented | arakel ♦36 | Hi osmidal, Thank you for the link, but I still don't see the value in mapping this shortcut. Just because an area belongs to the city doesn't automatically make it public. I know of an orchard owned by the city that is expressly off-limits to the public. However, I wonder why you didn't record the path yourself if it's important to you. Have you walked it? There is no visible access from Dorotheenstraße. What do you mean by “through the small forest”? Is there only one path that leads to a weekend property, or is there a path that runs through the area at a 90° angle to the “Schwarzer Weg”? | ||
| 7 | 2025-08-13 14:25 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | There are paths that branch of from "Schwarzer Weg" and join back to it. I did not map because I did not have the equipment to do so when I was there. It is not "important" to me, but I like completeness. About the fundamental question of "weather to map stuff that is not meant for access" I do not want to discuss it here, but please open a topic in the forum if you want. There have been lots of discussions about that already. Regards! | ||
| 8 | 2025-08-14 16:29 | commented | arakel ♦36 | My bad, nothing has been leased there for a few years. In fact, the site is included in the development plan (Bebauungsplan). So far, however, local residents have been able to prevent development. I just uploaded a GPX track, so you could map out the path. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/arakel/traces/12040168 By the way, I didn't want to argue. | ||
| 9 | 2025-08-14 16:42 | commented | Rhoon ♦3,833 | danke für die infos und deinen aufwand arakel! | ||
| 10 | 2025-08-14 19:30 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | I added the path: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170452760 Thanks for the track! | ||
| 4895454 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-06 13:17 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | If I remember correctly from 2025-07, those buildings ("Vesllie") are gone. But I might be wrong. Please check on site. | |
| 4895445 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-06 13:11 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | This actually is a footpath that continues. Survey date: 2025-07. | |
| 4895441 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-06 13:07 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | This "road" no longer is a road. At best, it is some difficult terrain cleared of plants. It seems that the road has been razed. Overgrowth expected, a hiking path might remain. Survey date: 2025-07. | |
| 4895442 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-06 13:07 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | This "road" no longer is a road. At best, it is some difficult terrain cleared of plants. It seems that the road has been razed. Overgrowth expected, a hiking path, or a track suitable for tractor or high-clearance 4-wheeler, _might_ remain. Survey date: 2025-07. | |
| 4512827 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-09 10:42 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Why is there another instance of Flixbus 039 going _here_? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3389905 Regards! | |
| 2 | 2025-07-15 21:37 | commented | burrscurr ♦485 | I find it quite difficult to keep track of those Flixbus relations. Does the issue still persist? When viewing the relation via its link the route looks normal (via Südvorstadt exit ramp + B 170). | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-16 17:40 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | This looks ok to me (now). I was wondering in _this_ note why "Flixbus 039" is doubled, but it was a false wondering: I did not know by then that each direction has it's own relation. | ||
| 4512825 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-09 10:41 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Why is Flixbus 039 going _here_? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3389906 | |
| 2 | 2025-07-15 21:43 | commented | burrscurr ♦485 | Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4512827: Can you still reproduce this? | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-16 17:38 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | On this one I still see the strange detour: https://i.imgur.com/WHfuGaO.png | ||
| 4 | 2025-07-16 20:19 | commented | burrscurr ♦485 | Ah, I see. That’s interesting. Perhaps those routes are maintained semi-automated (would make sense given their scale and how easy it is to break a route relation), with routing between fixed points along the route. But that‘s just a guess. | ||
| 4430013 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-09-11 10:47 | opened | --- | The tramway relations should be adapted, since the "3" and "7" will not run over here for some time. | |
| 2 | 2024-09-11 13:45 | commented | monotar ♦167 | es gibt aber noch keine offizielle Umleitung, auch die DVB wird sich erst überlegen müssen, wie sie langfristig die Linien umlegen ohne den Postplatz zu überlasten. | ||
| 3 | 2024-09-12 08:00 | commented | Sonnenmilch ♦194 | Daher gelten ab sofort neue Umleitungsstrecken: Linien 3 und 7: fahren eine Umleitung über Hauptbahnhof – Prager Straße – Postplatz – Augustusbrücke – Neustädter Markt – Carolaplatz Quelle: https://www.dvb.de/de-de/meta/aktuelle-meldungen/carolabruecke | ||
| 4 | 2024-10-02 10:12 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | The same for long distance and regional bus relations. | ||
| 5 | 2024-11-09 10:37 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | The Flixbus relations are still running over the bridge. They should be removed from here and re-routed. | ||
| 6 | 2025-07-07 17:34 | commented | Keinstein ♦64 | Eigentlich kann man die Carolabrücke jetzt abreißen. Vom südlichen Ende der Treppen zum Busparkplatz am Südufer bis zum Nordende der Filmnächte. Der Fußweg der dort quert geht auf halber Höhe unter der Brücke durch. | ||
| 7 | 2025-07-07 23:20 | commented | 4b696d ♦496 | Noch steht ein Teil der Brücke und dieser Zustand ist in OSM abgebildet. Somit ist eigentlich aktuell alles korrekt. | ||
| 8 | 2025-07-08 18:38 | commented | Keinstein ♦64 | Auf OSM stehen noch zwei Züge. Der freischwebende mittlere Teil ist inzwischen komplett abgerissen. die Nord-Segmente auch. Ich habe heute nicht geguckt. Viel stand jedenfalls letzte Woche Freitag nicht mehr. Mehr, als man auf https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/sachsen/dresden/dresden-radebeul/carolabruecke-livestream-webcam-102.html sieht steht nicht mehr. Die Segmente über dem Elberadweg sind jedenfalls schon lange nicht mehr da. Im iD sehe ich da momentan nicht durch, was da wie gemappt und getaggt wurde. | ||
| 9 | 2025-07-08 18:41 | commented | 4b696d ♦496 | Ja, vorhin haben sie die verbleibenden Teile eingerissen. | ||
| 10 | 2025-07-08 18:59 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Das issue ist eigentlich über public transport relations. Flixbus-Linien und Stadtrundfahrt sind immernoch hier lang gemappt: * https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9158951 * https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9172075 * https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10547272 * https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10547273 * https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10550574 * https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10550575 * https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17840230 Diese Relationen zu korrigieren übersteigt mein Können, daher diese "note". Das müsste noch gefixt werden, dann kann _diese_ note geschlossen werden. | ||
| 11 | 2025-07-08 19:45 | commented | 4b696d ♦496 | Die Flixbus-Routen waren als disused:route=bus eingetragen und sind seit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157854628 type=was:route. Ob es die überhaupt noch oder vielleicht auch wieder gibt, müsste mal geprüft werden. | ||
| 12 | 2025-08-08 17:46 | commented | burrscurr ♦485 | Aus meiner Sicht ist das Mappen der verifizierbar nicht mehr vorhandenen Brücke wichtiger als die anscheinend nicht mehr existenten Routen. Ich habe dazu auch im Forum nachgefragt (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/is-it-worth-to-keep-route-relations-that-doesnt-exist-anymore/133889), mal sehen, was dort die Meinung ist. | ||
| 3887807 | 1 | 2023-09-13 22:41 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Hier ist eine verlassene Hütte mit beschädigten Fenstern/ Tür. via StreetComplete 54.0 | |
| 2 | 2025-07-08 16:33 | commented | burrscurr ♦485 | Ich habe es erst mal als building=yes + abandoned=yes erfasst (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168658616). Falls du noch weißt, welche Art das Gebäude war (bungalow? shed? cabin?), gerne ergänzen. Sonst würde ich den Hinweis erst mal schließen. | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-08 18:43 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | 👌 | ||
| 4761219 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-15 21:21 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Taxifirmakommunikationssäule ist hier, außer Betrieb. via StreetComplete_ee 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278358.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-07-01 16:58 | commented | burrscurr ♦485 | Interessant. Wenn du (oder jemand anderes) sich berufen fühlt das zu mappen, gerne! Der Hinweis könnte aus meiner Sicht aber geschlossen werden, ich denke das ist kein Kartenfehler im engeren Sinne. (Bin da aber offen für andere Sichtweisen.) | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-02 06:44 | commented | scai ♦1,884 | Ich finde nicht mal ein Tag dafür. Man könnte sich natürlich ein neues ausdenken, für etwas nicht funktionierendes wäre das allerdings ein bisschen übertrieben. Daher bin ich auch eher dafür, dieses Objekt zu ignorieren. | ||
| 4 | 2025-07-02 10:57 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Nur Bezugnahme auf > ch denke das ist kein Kartenfehler im engeren Sinne. Sind map notes nur für Kartenfehler? Ich dachte, für allgemeine Hinweise, auch wo Dinge komplettiert werden können. Oder nur wo "gröberes" nicht gemappt ist? | ||
| 5 | 2025-07-02 10:57 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | |||
| 6 | 2025-07-02 12:10 | reopened | scai ♦1,884 | |||
| 7 | 2025-07-02 12:16 | commented | scai ♦1,884 | Hinweise können prinzipiell für alles genutzt werden, was verbessert werden kann. Egal ob für offensichtliche Fehler oder für kleinere, fehlende Dinge. Jedoch sollte abgewägt werden, ob ein Hinweis sinnvoll ist. In deinem Fall war er das durchaus, denke ich. Es hat sich dann nur herausgestellt, dass der Mehrwert eher gering ist und der Hinweis daher nicht unbedingt offen bleiben muss. Mit abwägen meine ich: Schaut man sich die Hinweise in Dresden an, dann gibt es mittlerweile sehr viele davon und in der Regel nur wenige Personen, die diesen Hinweisen nachgehen und sie lösen/schließen. Daher ist meine persönliche Meinung dazu, dass nur größere Dinge gemeldet werden sollten (fehlende/falsche POIs und ähnliches), bei kleineren Dingen sollte man es vielleicht eher lassen oder diese Dinge einfach selber eintragen. Andernfalls steigt die Anzahl offener (und irgendwann veralteter) Hinweise immer weiter und es leidet die Übersicht. Sobald es bessere Tools gibt zum Filtern der Hinweise gibt, sieht das vielleicht anders aus. Bzw. es gibt durchaus andere Seiten, auf denen OSM-Hinweise bereits gefiltert und besser dargestellt werden können. Jedoch nutzen viele vermutlich weiterhin die Hauptseite und dort ist diese Funktion aktuell eher nicht besonders gut integriert. So ein richtig oder falsch gibt es wie so oft nicht. Was wichtig und was unwichtig ist, sieht auch jeder ein bisschen anders :) | ||
| 8 | 2025-07-04 16:06 | closed | scai ♦1,884 | |||
| 4778530 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-27 22:05 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | The mapped footway is not connected to the road. Check locally if this really should be the case; if yes maybe add an appropriate 'note'-tag, otherwise connect (and add barrier and access restriction if present). | |
| 2 | 2025-08-27 13:17 | closed | mikaff0 ♦10 | I checked it in person and fixed it in the map | ||
| 4528961 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-22 12:08 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | According to Geoportal Brandenburg (https://geoportal.brandenburg.de/en/cms/portal/home/geosearch/e281775b-807f-4c81-9581-8627659f6005), there are ways here, and especially one way that passes over the motorway at this point. The whole area could use some more mapping of individual tracks and paths :-). | |
| 2 | 2025-05-25 18:54 | closed | Protoxenus ♦4,791 | This is a game bridge so that the animals can cross the motorway without endangering the traffic. However, we do not map wildlife trails in OSM. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-25 21:27 | reopened | osmidal ♦215 | |||
| 4 | 2025-05-25 21:28 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | > However, we do not map wildlife trails in OSM. Ah OK, thanks for the explanation. As I understood so far, also "inofficial" trails that to the average human look like a path are mapped (with appropriate "access" tags). Regards! | ||
| 4771394 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-22 22:01 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | The sidewaljs here have "bicycle=yes". This in conflict with what I remember. Resurvey. | |
| 2 | 2025-08-27 12:24 | closed | mikaff0 ♦10 | |||
| 4762869 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-16 21:54 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Here is a `fence_type=hedge`, which should be corrected according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhedge#Possible_Tagging_Mistake. Regards! | |
| 2 | 2025-05-21 18:22 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | Fixed. See note at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/10772871 | ||
| 3290113 | 1 | 2022-07-30 06:25 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Here is another way. via StreetComplete 45.0 Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/105100.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-20 18:20 | closed | Lenkradfreek ♦248 | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-20 18:25 | reopened | osmidal ♦215 | |||
| 4 | 2025-05-20 18:28 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | I have to re-check it locally, but as far as I remember there are _two_ ways leading down from Goldbornhof house 3. It's micro mapping, though. | ||
| 5 | 2025-05-20 18:29 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Or, the second path I meant is leading to the picnic table (but branching of from the steps, not from the path at the top of the Goldbornhof). | ||
| 4764884 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-18 09:45 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Das ist niemals ein Brunnen. Es hat einen Auslauf in der Art eines Ablaufes wenn vielwasser-überlaufes. Vom Hochbehälter? | That is never a well. It has an outlet like a drain when overflowing with a lot of water, from the elevated tank? |
| 4763901 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-17 14:23 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Is here a short stretch of steps? | |
| 2 | 2025-08-10 15:19 | commented | Dalinar ♦3 | Yes | ||
| 4763899 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-17 14:22 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Are here also benches around the firepit? On the other "Höfe" there are usually four, currently mapped as ``` amenity=bench armrest=no backrest=no colour=brown material=wood note=this bench is movable, and the exact location around the firepit changes ``` | |
| 2 | 2025-08-10 19:06 | commented | Dalinar ♦3 | Yes, there are five new looking benches with the specified properties | ||
| 4763632 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-17 12:53 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Is this shelter also operated by the advertising company that operates the other shelters, or directly by "Dresdner Verkehrsbetriebe AG", or by some other entity? | |
| 2 | 2025-08-24 20:25 | commented | mikaff0 ♦10 | A round shelter operated by Dresdner Verkehrsbetriebe AG | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-05 10:06 | closed | mikaff0 ♦10 | |||
| 4694545 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-03 17:43 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Unable to answer "What overall color does this building have?" – Dresdner Verkehrsbetriebe AG [181] (Transit Shelter) – https://osm.org/way/1085674153 via StreetComplete_ee 60.3: Its mainly glass, with brown pillars. Which colour value should be tagged? | |
| 2 | 2025-04-27 22:27 | closed | burrscurr ♦485 | Shelters for public transport are usually not tagged as buildings (see wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dtransportation). Accordingly, I removed the building tags and some other tags mostly related to outdoor-y shelters (fireplace etc. --> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165525075). I'm guessing that SCEE usually does not ask that question for transit shelters. As far as I know, building color tags are mostly used for 3D city models. In this context, I'd say that probably the most common color should be tagged. Considering the complexity of every real-world building, there will always be a need for some simplification. Since IMO there is pretty little usefulness in mapping the color of a transit shelter, I'm closing this note. However, If you feel strongly about this, I don't mind if you want to add this tag. | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-28 10:16 | reopened | osmidal ♦215 | |||
| 4 | 2025-04-28 10:18 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | > probably the most common color should be tagged. But which one is it? Is it "brown" because that is the predominant colour of the non-glass elements? But the glass elements are most prominent overall, so is `color=glass` a suitable tagging? Here a photograph: https://streetcomplete.app/p/268902.jpg | ||
| 5 | 2025-04-28 10:18 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | (`color=transparent`, not `color=glass`.) | ||
| 6 | 2025-04-28 10:24 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Put this to discussion at the OpenStreetMap forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/129352 -- I think best is to continue there. | ||
| 7 | 2025-04-28 15:47 | commented | burrscurr ♦485 | To me, building color tagging is not particularly important and I'm not sure whether there even can be an objective way of tagging it. Thank you nonetheless for discussing this in the forum, I think this is a great attitude! | ||
| 8 | 2025-05-17 12:28 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | [Resolved](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166389596). | ||
| 4545210 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-12-06 14:40 | opened | sbjf ♦76 | Unable to answer "Does this crosswalk have tactile paving on both ends?" – Crossing – https://osm.org/node/3910931616 via StreetComplete 59.3: Difference in paving, but does it count as tactile? Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/253097.jpg | |
| 2 | 2024-12-09 13:06 | commented | scai ♦1,884 | No, at most this could be tactile_paving=primitive. However I would stick to tactile_paving=no. | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-28 18:47 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | See also this discussion: http://community.openstreetmap.org/t/129339 | ||
| 4 | 2025-05-17 10:49 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | Adding `tactile_paving=no` in this case. | ||
| 5 | 2025-07-13 16:15 | reopened | scai ♦1,884 | |||
| 6 | 2025-07-13 16:16 | closed | scai ♦1,884 | I asked the author of WalkersGuide (https://www.walkersguide.org/), an OSM-based navigation app for the blind/visually impaired. He is from Dresden, knows these situations and recommends using tactile_paving=primitive. His explanation is: On the one hand, the sett surface indicates that there is a crossing here. On the other hand, the use of "no" would be confusing if paving stones suddenly appear which local people can identify as tactile guidelines. Of course, there is a certain bias here as a Dresden resident if you are familiar with these conditions. For visitors from different areas, this might be a little unexpected, but on the other hand, "primitive" is perhaps enough to indicate that a special situation is to be expected here. Therefore I changed the value here from "no" to "primitive." I just wanted to pass that on as information. | ||
| 3629469 | 1 | 2023-04-06 08:40 | opened | brust84 ♦251 | Unable to answer "Does this crosswalk have tactile paving on both sides?" for https://osm.org/node/10592923114 via StreetComplete 51.1: Hier ist die (für Dresden typische) Ausführung mit Steinpflaster, die aber nicht so "offiziell" wie auf den Beispielbildern aussieht. Trotzdem ist eigentlich ziemlich eindeutig, dass es sich um eine Leithilfe handeln soll. Wie also taggen? Das Wiki schlägt noch den Wert "primitive" für zufälligerweise nutzbare taktile Hinweise vor, aber das stimmt ja im Prinzip auch nicht. Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/140439.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-15 07:57 | commented | scai ♦1,884 | tactile_paving=yes kann es meiner Meinung nach nicht sein, da es kein echtes Bodenleitsystem ist, es ist beispielsweise auch keinerlei Richtung ertastbar. Dann bleibt im Prinzip nur tactile_paving=primitive übrig, wenn man nicht =no vergeben möchte. Laut taginfo gibt es auch ein paar Verwendungen von tactile_paving=cobblestone aber das ist auch nicht sehr aussagekräftig. | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-28 18:48 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | See also this discussion: http://community.openstreetmap.org/t/129339 | ||
| 4 | 2025-05-17 10:49 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | Added `tactile_paving=primitive` in this case. | ||
| 5 | 2025-07-13 16:08 | reopened | scai ♦1,884 | |||
| 6 | 2025-07-13 16:09 | closed | scai ♦1,884 | Ich habe den Autor von WalkersGuide (https://www.walkersguide.org/), einer OSM-basierten Navigations-App für Blinde/Sehbehinderte, nachgefragt. Er ist Dresdner, kennt diese Situationen und empfiehlt, tactile_paving=primitive zu verwenden. Seine Begründung ist: Einerseits gibt das Pflaster an, dass hier eine Querung existiert. Andererseits würde die Verwendung von "no" irritieren, wenn dann doch plötzlich Pflaster kommt, was an taktile Leitlinien erinnert. Wobei hier natürlich eine gewisser Voreingenommenheit als Dresdner existiert, wenn man mit diesen Gegebenheiten vertraut ist. Für Menschen von außerhalb könnte das etwas unerwartet sein, andererseits ist "primitive" vielleicht ausreichend um anzuzeigen, dass hier mit einer Besonderheit zu rechnen ist. Das wollte ich nur mal als Information weitergeben. | ||
| 7 | 2025-07-14 09:32 | reopened | brust84 ♦251 | |||
| 8 | 2025-07-14 09:32 | commented | brust84 ♦251 | Spitze! Ich denke, das ist die belastbarste Aussage zu dem Thema bisher. Ich hatte vor einiger Zeit mehrere Überwege mit "no" getagt, an denen die Pflasterung aber vorhanden war. Wenn ich Zeit finde, dann versuche ich mal die per API rauszusuchen und zu überprüfen. | ||
| 9 | 2025-07-14 09:32 | closed | brust84 ♦251 | |||
| 4762872 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-16 21:56 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Here is a `fence_type=hedge`, which should be corrected according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhedge#Possible_Tagging_Mistake. Regards! | |
| 2 | 2025-05-17 12:35 | closed | Tatfahren ♦3,318 | Das wurde mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166380202 korrigiert. | ||
| 4762871 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-16 21:55 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Here is a `fence_type=hedge`, which should be corrected according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhedge#Possible_Tagging_Mistake. Regards! | |
| 2 | 2025-05-22 08:57 | closed | Rhoon ♦3,833 | corrected | ||
| 4761269 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-15 22:51 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | The two 'railway=signal' have 'fixme=[See note at this location.]', but I cannot find any note here. What is the actual issue? via StreetComplete_ee 61.0 | No translation available as the input appears to be a code or filename rather than a text in a foreign language. |
| 2 | 2025-05-16 14:33 | closed | Tatfahren ♦3,318 | Der einzige note den Ich an der Stelle gefunden habe handelt von Fehlerhaften maxspeed tags am Gleis. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3309079 Das fixme hast du damals aber selber hinzugefügt, weshalb ich bezweifle das jemand anderes weiß was du damit gemeint haben könntest.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132193917 | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-16 14:33 | reopened | Tatfahren ♦3,318 | |||
| 4 | 2025-05-16 14:53 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | Dann hat vielleicht wer anders die dazugehörige "note" bereits gefixt aber das nicht dazugehörige `fixme=*`. OK, dann lösche ich mal das `fixme=*`. Gruß! | ||
| 5 | 2025-05-16 16:13 | reopened | Tatfahren ♦3,318 | |||
| 6 | 2025-05-16 16:16 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Ich sehe dass Du diese Notiz wieder aktiviert hast. Nach https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3309079#map=15/51.10372/13.76916 ist das zu Grunde liegende "Issue" denke ich gelöst. Welchen Grund gibt es, diese Notiz noch aktiv zu haben? | ||
| 7 | 2025-05-16 16:16 | closed | Tatfahren ♦3,318 | Mit https://ent8r.github.io/NotesReview/ kann man auch geschlossene und sogar durch die DWG versteckte notes sehen, aber dort wurde mir nichts weiteres angezeigt. Das einzigste was ich mir vorstellen kann, ist das mit Note ein Punkt mit "note-tag" gemeint war, der inzwischen gelöscht wurde. | ||
| 8 | 2025-05-16 16:23 | reopened | Tatfahren ♦3,318 | |||
| 9 | 2025-05-16 16:24 | closed | Tatfahren ♦3,318 | Um eine Antwort zu einem geschlossenen note zu schreiben, muss ich diesen zuvor reaktivieren. Natürlich brauche ich dann einige Zeit zum schreiben der Antwort, was man nicht sehen kann, so wie ich deine Antwort erst nach dem absenden meiner lesen konnte. | ||
| 4762157 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-16 11:33 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Unable to answer "What’s the height limit below the bridge?" – Königsbrücker Straße [B 97] (Primary Road) – https://osm.org/way/427816047 via StreetComplete 61.0: There is no sign. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-16 14:25 | commented | Tatfahren ♦3,318 | Ja, das ist auch in OSM so angegeben. Kann es sein das es sich um die Aufgabe handelt, die zum manuellen Messen auffordert, wenn zuvor angegeben wurde, das kein Schild vorhanden ist? Häufig werden bei dieser Aufgabe notes erstellt, das dort kein Schild wäre, was aber bekannt ist. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-16 14:47 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | Hm, weiß ich nicht mehr. Aber wenn das häufig passiert: Vllt. wäre das eine Rückmeldung an StreetComplete wert, da die Formulierungen zu ändern? | ||
| 4762272 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-16 13:45 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Unable to answer "What kind of service building is this?" – Sachsen Netze (Service Building) – https://osm.org/way/1079669539 via StreetComplete_ee 61.0: Something with gas. Unclear if pumping or pressure reduction or sth. else. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278411.jpg | |
| 4759240 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:28 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Here is an artificial body of water. via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278156.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 23:03 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Currently created as node, should be mapped as area. | ||
| 4750494 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-09 18:31 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Somewhere here there is an (artificial) lake. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 18:29 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Here a photograph. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278170.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-15 23:02 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Currently created as node, should be mapped as area. | ||
| 4759150 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 17:03 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | A path branches off here (in the picture to the right). via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278125.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 22:59 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Path created. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-15 22:59 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | |||
| 4759151 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 17:03 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Here is the other end of the path across the meadow (in the picture on the left). via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278126.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 22:58 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Path created. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-15 22:59 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | |||
| 4759267 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:29 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Some unknown locked access shaft. via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278176.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/278177.jpg | |
| 4759262 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:29 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Access track to the body of water. via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278172.jpg | |
| 4759256 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:29 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Need to find a proper tag for this barrier made of tree branches. via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278166.jpg | |
| 4759243 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:29 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | The access way to the artificial body of water. via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278157.jpg | |
| 4759155 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 17:03 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Could not really find thus footoath. Please resurvey. via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 | Street Complete version 60.3 in Estonian |
| 4759154 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 17:03 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | A service track branches off here to the west. via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278130.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-19 10:20 | commented | Deus Figendi ♦633 | Could someone walk along and track a GPS-path? It's not visible on the areal images, so I cannot say where it leads to. | ||
| 4759153 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 17:03 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | boundary_stone via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278129.jpg | |
| 4759152 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 17:03 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | A path branches off here to the south. To the north: A dead end service track. via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278127.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/278128.jpg | |
| 4759149 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 17:03 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | This way is also no access for horses and horse carts. via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278124.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-28 20:53 | closed | Kay Klotzsche ♦304 | is in OSM | ||
| 4759148 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 17:03 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Here is a path connecting from the way in the forest to the playground and to the way on the meadow. via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278123.jpg | |
| 4759147 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 17:03 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Here is an overflow if the basin has too much water. via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278122.jpg | |
| 4759146 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-14 17:03 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Way starts to be dedicated footway from here westwards, and private way use at own risk. via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278121.jpg | |
| 4748262 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | 2025-05-08 12:51 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Hier ist eine "abandoned" und halb verfallene in Beton und Stahl gefasste Grube. #OsmAnd | Here is an "abandoned" and half decayed pit enclosed in concrete and steel. |
| 4743983 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-05 16:59 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216204085 is mapped with `access=restricted`. According to the wiki [1], this tag should not be used but replaced with more appropriate tags. [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=restricted Commit note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18813205/history/1 | |
| 2 | 2025-06-29 14:37 | closed | GiovanniPen ♦417 | moved to fixme | ||
| 4133798 | 1 | 2024-03-01 07:59 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | It is a track (grade5 or grade4) up to here. #OsmAnd | |
| 2 | 2025-04-02 14:01 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | Changed. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-05 14:12 | commented | ivanbranco ♦12,087 | can the note be closed? | ||
| 4 | 2025-05-05 16:55 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | > can the note be closed? Yes, thanks for the *ping*. Closed. | ||
| 4149701 | 1 | 2024-03-12 07:47 | opened | --- | Gebäude wurden abgerissen | |
| 2 | 2025-04-25 11:59 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | A person with local knowledge confirmed that the building has been dismantled, but is unsure about the current status (rumour that something new is to be built here). | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-11 12:08 | closed | osmmapper222 ♦2,865 | tagge gebäude als abgerissen | ||
| 4727268 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-25 11:55 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Hier ist kein Wald sondern eine Freifläche für Fahrzeuge | There is no forest but an open area for vehicles |
| 2 | 2025-06-12 13:26 | closed | jmb1982 ♦11 | |||
| 4727267 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-25 11:54 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Dies hier ist als "Bushaltestelle" markiert. Bushaltestelle (`bus_stop`) ist sehr wahrscheinlich falsch. Bitte mir Ortskenntnis üebrprüfen und ggf. korrigieren (`tram_stop`, ggf. mit Angaben dass dies nur Museumsbetrieb ist?) | This is marked as a "bus stop". Bus stop is very likely incorrect. Please check local knowledge and correct if necessary (tram stop, possibly with notes that this is only museum operation?) |
| 2 | 2025-06-12 13:13 | closed | jmb1982 ♦11 | |||
| 4727265 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-25 11:53 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Dies hier ist als "Bushaltestelle" markiert. Bushaltestelle (`bus_stop`) ist sehr wahrscheinlich falsch. Bitte mir Ortskenntnis üebrprüfen und ggf. korrigieren (`tram_stop`, ggf. mit Angaben dass dies nur Museumsbetrieb ist?) | This is marked as a "Bushaltestelle". Bushaltestelle (bus stop) is very likely incorrect. Please check local knowledge and correct if necessary (tram stop, possibly with notes that this is only museum operation?). |
| 2 | 2025-06-12 13:12 | closed | jmb1982 ♦11 | |||
| 4727264 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-25 11:52 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Dies hier ist als "Busbahnhof" markiert. Busbahnhof (`bus_station`) ist sehr wahrscheinlich falsch. Bitte mir Ortskenntnis üebrprüfen und ggf. korrigieren (`tram_stop`, ggf. mit Angaben dass dies nur Museumsbetrieb ist?) | This is marked as a "bus station". Bus station (bus_station) is likely incorrect. Please check local knowledge and correct if necessary (tram_stop, possibly with notes that this is only museum operation?) |
| 2 | 2025-06-12 13:12 | closed | jmb1982 ♦11 | |||
| 4727263 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-25 11:48 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | According to https://fernmeldemuseum-dresden.de/umzug-des-ausstellungsraumes/, the museum is not anymore here but has moved to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2717081902. | According to https://fernmeldemuseum-dresden.de/umzug-des-ausstellungsraumes/, the museum is no longer here but has moved to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2717081902. |
| 2 | 2025-09-19 08:17 | closed | vsandre ♦84 | |||
| 4693286 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-02 18:17 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Here is a stone with a cross in the ground. What does it mean? via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/268959.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-04-14 18:23 | commented | Stricki63 ♦161 | Grenzstein | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-15 11:49 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | Added the boundary marker: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164980733 | ||
| 4512822 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-09 10:39 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Bus relations are still running over the bridge. For some foreseeable time there is no traffic here, so the bus relations need adaption, too. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-18 13:27 | commented | HirschKauz ♦1,669 | siehe hier unter Verkehrshinweise: https://bad-schandau.de/rathaus-politik#aktuelles | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-10 12:14 | commented | mardiz ♦4,025 | Die Brücke ist ab heute 13 Uhr wieder frei für Fahrzeuge bis 7,5 t | ||
| 4 | 2025-04-10 12:16 | commented | mardiz ♦4,025 | sowie Radfahrer und Fußgänger | ||
| 5 | 2025-04-10 12:39 | closed | monotar ♦167 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164767200 | ||
| 6 | 2025-04-10 12:54 | reopened | osmidal ♦215 | |||
| 7 | 2025-04-10 12:55 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | The bridge is _still_ closed for busses, so the bus routes going over this bridge need still to be removed, so this issue is _not_ to be closed. See also https://www.rvsoe.de/aktuell/aktuell/elbbruecke-bad-schandau-kein-busverkehr-elbquerend-freigabe-nur-fuer-fzg-bis-75t-rad-fussgaenger: > Die Elbbrücke der Bundestraße > 172 war bis 10. April 2025 voll > gesperrt. > > Seitdem ist sie für Fahrzeuge > bis 7,5t, Radfahrer und Fuß- > gänger freigegeben. > > Für Linienbusse bleibt sie > weiterhin gesperrt! > Es können somit keine Bus- > se zwischen Stadt und Bahn- > hof (über die Elbe) verkehren. | ||
| 8 | 2025-04-14 12:05 | closed | samuelcdecker | Brücke seit 10.04.2025 (Donnerstag) wieder offen für Verkehrsteilnehmer bis 7,5t | ||
| 9 | 2025-04-14 12:55 | reopened | osmidal ♦215 | |||
| 10 | 2025-04-14 12:56 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | > Brücke seit 10.04.2025 (Donnerstag) wieder offen für Verkehrsteilnehmer bis 7,5t Aber _nicht_ für Linienbusse!, und das ist was dieses issue about ist hier. Ich habe auch schon verlinkt die Quelle dafür, dass Linienbusse hier nicht rüber fahren. Bitte erst das Issue hier verstehen bevor unverstanden es fälschlicherweise "resolved" wird, dies ist nun schon das 2. Mal. Die Bus-Routen, die hier langgehen, müssen geändert werden. | ||
| 11 | 2025-07-31 00:34 | commented | mardiz ♦4,025 | Bus 241 nach Nationalparkbahnhof, Bad Schandau Do. 31. Juli 2025 05:4505:45 ZOB/Bahnhof, Pirna 05:4705:47 05:4705:47 Breite Straße, Pirna 05:4805:48 05:4805:48 Bergstraße, Pirna 05:5105:51 05:5105:51 Landratsamt, Pirna 05:5205:52 05:5205:52 Klinikum, Pirna 05:5305:53 05:5305:53 Abzw. Cunnersdorf, Pirna 05:5605:56 05:5605:56 Ebenheit bei Pirna, Struppen 05:5905:59 05:5905:59 Sportplatz, Struppen 06:0006:00 06:0006:00 Südstraße, Struppen 06:0106:01 06:0106:01 Struppen Mitte 06:0206:02 06:0206:02 Post, Struppen 06:0406:04 06:0406:04 Thürmsdorf Abzw. Weißig, Struppen 06:0506:05 06:0506:05 Thürmsdorf Mitte, Struppen 06:0606:06 06:0606:06 Thürmsdorf Gasthaus, Struppen 06:0806:08 06:0806:08 Thürmsdorf Vogelstein/Festung, Struppen 06:1106:11 06:1506:15 Reißigerplatz/Bahnhof, Königstein (Sächs. Schw.) 06:1706:17 06:1706:17 Mittelweg, Königstein (Sächs. Schw.) 06:2406:24 06:2606:26 Nationalparkbahnhof, Bad Schandau Busstg. 6 Geändert zu Bussteig 6 06:2606:26 06:2606:26 Nationalparkbahnhof, Bad Schandau 06:2806:28 06:2806:28 Krippen Bornfähre, Bad Schandau 06:2906:29 06:2906:29 Krippen Bahnhof, Bad Schandau 06:3006:30 06:3006:30 Krippen Alte Schule, Bad Schandau 06:3406:34 06:3406:34 Kleinhennersdorf Hauptstraße, Gohrisch 06:3506:35 06:3606:36 Kleinhennersdorf Wendeplatz, Gohrisch 06:3706:37 06:3706:37 Kleinhennersdorf Hauptstraße, Gohrisch 06:3906:39 06:3906:39 Papstdorf Gasthaus Hoffnung, Gohrisch 06:4106:41 06:4106:41 Papstdorf Erblehngericht, Gohrisch 06:4206:42 06:4206:42 Papstdorf Ortsanfang, Gohrisch 06:4306:43 06:4306:43 Papstdorf Papststein, Gohrisch 06:4606:46 06:4606:46 Cunnersdorf Abzw. zum Pfaffenstein, Gohrisch 06:4806:48 06:4806:48 Cunnersdorf Schmiede, Gohrisch 06:4906:49 06:4906:49 Cunnersdorf Erbgericht, Gohrisch 06:5006:50 06:5006:50 Cunnersdorf Deutsches Haus, Gohrisch 06:5106:51 06:5106:51 Cunnersdorf Erbgericht, Gohrisch 06:5206:52 06:5206:52 Cunnersdorf Schmiede, Gohrisch 06:5306:53 06:5306:53 Cunnersdorf Friedhof, Gohrisch 06:5506:55 06:5506:55 Cunnersd | ||
| 4710288 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-14 12:38 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Here are also a few garages (to park cars), not mapped currently by me since aerial imagery is not clear enough (trees) and I am not anymore at the spot. | |
| 2 | 2025-10-21 10:05 | closed | Rhoon ♦3,833 | was zu sehen war, wurde gemappt | ||
| 4706643 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-12 09:10 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Operating times for tram lines 1, 2, 3, 4 should be added as tags, since only 2 and 4 usually operate during the day; 1 and 3 only in very specific short time windows. | |
| 4706642 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-12 09:09 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | There is a night tram "40" as well, whose route is not tagged yet. | |
| 4694621 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-03 18:39 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Thus is mapped as car park _and_ footway on the same area. This does not look correct. via StreetComplete_ee 60.3 | Street Complete version 60.3 in Estonian |
| 2 | 2025-08-27 12:26 | closed | mikaff0 ♦10 | |||
| 4694546 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-03 17:43 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Unable to answer "What overall color does this building have?" – Dresdner Verkehrsbetriebe AG [180] (Transit Shelter) – https://osm.org/way/1085674152 via StreetComplete_ee 60.3: Its mainly glass, with brown pillars. Which colour value should be tagged? | |
| 2 | 2025-04-27 22:27 | closed | burrscurr ♦485 | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4694545 | ||
| 4694544 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-03 17:43 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Unable to answer "What overall color does this building have?" – Dresdner Verkehrsbetriebe AG (Transit Shelter) – https://osm.org/way/1085674150 via StreetComplete_ee 60.3: Its mainly glass, with brown pillars. Which colour value should be tagged? | |
| 2 | 2025-04-27 22:27 | closed | burrscurr ♦485 | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4694545 | ||
| 4693059 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-02 15:12 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | On the north end of this track there are signs that access is prohibited. I made this small part `access=private`, but it needs to be checked how far to the south this reaches and the ways to the south need adaption, too. | |
| 4619650 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-08 17:38 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | A path now branches off here from the platform into the forest. Needs to be mapped by someone who happens to be there _and_ has mapping equipment while there (me not, currently :-(). | |
| 2 | 2025-04-02 14:16 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | Added the path. Fixed. | ||
| 4668391 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-17 12:08 | opened | Pinuttay ♦39 | Werden die Fahrgastinformationstafeln in Haltestellenhäuschen wirklich separat angegeben? via StreetComplete_ee 60.2 | Street Complete version 60.2 in Estonian |
| 2 | 2025-04-02 12:43 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | I don't know; maybe someone more knowledgeable can fix this from the distance. Information on how it is on all public transport shelters at thus stop: Exactly one information board is in each shelter (also in the 10-cornered on the central "plaza"), and none rlsewhere. Additionally a live display integrated into the stop signs at the four regularly servef platforms. Photograph attached. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/268903.jpg | ||
| 4692853 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-02 12:42 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Unable to answer "What overall color does this building have?" – Transit Shelter – https://osm.org/way/1085674151 via StreetComplete_ee 60.3: StreetComplete EE asks me what ovetall colour this shelter has. Should I say "brown" because the non-transparent elements are brown, or "transparent" because it is mostly glass? I attach a photograph so that more knowledgeable people can fix this from the distance. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/268902.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-04-27 22:28 | closed | burrscurr ♦485 | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4694545 | ||
| 4692852 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-02 12:42 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Unable to answer "What overall color does this building have?" – Transit Shelter – https://osm.org/way/585041931 via StreetComplete_ee 60.3: StreetComplete EE asks me what ovetall colour this shelter has. Should I say "brown" because the non-transparent elements are brown, or "transparent" because it is mostly glass? I attach a photograph so that more knowledgeable people can fix this from the distance. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/268901.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-05 10:03 | closed | mikaff0 ♦10 | I edit it to transparent, case the significant parts of the "walls" are transparent. | ||
| 3279439 | 1 | 2022-07-23 11:49 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | A new forest track has appeared here. via StreetComplete 45.0 Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/103879.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-27 12:39 | commented | Emilius123 ♦1,758 | Hi, this is, unfortunately, tough to impossible to add without further description. Could you or someone maybe provide a GPS track of the forest track to assist in tracing it? Thank you. | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-27 15:02 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | > this is, unfortunately, tough to impossible to add without further description. It is a note for someone who gets here to go and map. Nothing to map from the distance. | ||
| 4 | 2025-03-27 15:22 | commented | Emilius123 ♦1,758 | Yeah, I can tell. | ||
| 4656496 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-08 19:41 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | "railway=razed" feature should not be mapped at all, but should be moved to "Open Historical Map", since only features which are still present and verifiable on the ground should be mapped. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Drazed | |
| 4656495 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-08 19:38 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Something seems to be tagged wrongly here with the "Steinhuder Meer-Bahn": In the public transport rendering it is actually rendered as a line in use for regular passenger transport: https://öpnvkarte.de/#9.1981;52.4523;13 Please fix. | |
| 4512885 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-09 11:33 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | route=ferry "Sächcische Dampfschifffahrt" should be split up here and not continue under the bridge, since the waterway is blocked and forbidden to use here. | Route ferry "Saxon Steam Shipping" should be split up here and not continue under the bridge, since the waterway is blocked and forbidden to use here. |
| 2 | 2025-01-29 12:58 | closed | Stefan Kühn ♦208 | Since 2025-01-27 the waterway is open. See: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/wirtschaft/schifffahrt-auf-der-elbe-carolabruecke-dresden-ab-montag-fuer-binnenschiffe-passierbar-dpa.urn-newsml-dpa-com-20090101-250129-930-358937 | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-01 14:45 | reopened | osmidal ♦215 | |||
| 4 | 2025-02-01 14:48 | commented | osmidal ♦215 | It is _not_ open: * Passengers are not allowed to pass, * freight and ships without passengers only with special permissions. https://www.dresden.de/de/rathaus/aktuelles/pressemitteilungen/01/pm_049.php > Für die Passagier- und Freizeitschifffahrt bleibt der Bereich unter der Carolabrücke weiterhin gesperrt. So the route=ferry "Sächcische Dampfschifffahrt" is still to be split here. | ||
| 5 | 2025-04-01 08:13 | closed | bes199 ♦118 | osmidal is correct, the bridge can only be passed under special circumstances. Also, Sächsische Dampfschifffahrt provided a "Anlegerübersicht" https://www.saechsische-dampfschifffahrt.de/wp-content/media/2025/03/Lageplan-web.pdf which implies that there's no passenger service passing the bridge. I already updated the ferry route. | ||
| 4384524 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-08-15 10:34 | opened | osmidal ♦215 | Here are two sets of `highway=steps`. | |
| 2 | 2024-09-04 18:49 | commented | osm-user12 ♦426 | For those cases providing informative photos would be a good choice | ||
| 3 | 2024-11-13 08:33 | closed | osm-user12 ♦426 | erl. | ||
| 4 | 2024-11-13 13:08 | reopened | osmidal ♦215 | |||
| 5 | 2024-11-13 13:08 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | > For those cases providing informative photos would be a good choice I did not have any photographic device with me. | ||
| 4510639 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-07 13:03 | opened | rik_ ♦102 | Die Straße[1] auf der Brücke wurde mit `access=no` getagged – wie sieht es mit dem eingezeichneten Fußweg[2] aus? Ist dieser auch gesperrt? [1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60730195 [2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1187406279 | The road on the bridge was tagged with `access=no` – what about the marked footpath? Is it also closed? |
| 2 | 2024-11-08 23:25 | commented | mardiz ♦4,025 | Da Radfahrende auch nicht drüber dürfen sind auch Zufußgehende auf die Fähre angewiesen, welche von 4:30 bis 22:30 im15min-Takt pendeln soll | ||
| 3 | 2024-11-09 11:34 | closed | osmidal ♦215 | It has already been solved by someone else in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158860149 |