| Note | # | Tmstmp UTC | Event | Contributor | Comment | Auto-translation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4956205 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-10 18:29 | opened | Woazboat ♦363 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12118187183 `name=Emergency shelter` bzw. `name:de=Notlager` ist hier mit ziemlicher Sicherheit falsch. Handelt es sich hier generell überhaupt um etwas das diese Beschreibung verdient? Zuerst war die node nur mit `natural=cave_entrance` getaggt, dann wurde daraus ein `amenity=shelter` + `shelter_type=rock_shelter`. | The name "Emergency shelter" or "Notlager" is probably incorrect here. Does this generally deserve a description like that at all? Initially, the node was only tagged with "natural=cave_entrance", then it became an "amenity=shelter" + "shelter_type=rock_shelter". |
| 2 | 2025-09-11 08:02 | closed | PPete2 ♦6,204 | |||
| 3 | 2025-09-11 08:03 | reopened | PPete2 ♦6,204 | |||
| 4 | 2025-09-11 08:05 | commented | -=|MisterY|=- ♦819 | Yes, this is a small cave but has external markings that it is an emergency shelter. What seems to be the problem? | ||
| 5 | 2025-09-11 08:17 | commented | -=|MisterY|=- ♦819 | I've adjusted the tags but am not sure how to "correctly" indicate the above. | ||
| 6 | 2025-09-11 11:28 | commented | Woazboat ♦363 | If there are markings or a sign then I guess it's okay, but the `name` is not a proper name and should go in `description` instead. | ||
| 7 | 2025-09-18 08:03 | commented | PPete2 ♦6,204 | I've changed name to description.@ -=|MisterY|=- just for interest: how did the "external markings that it is an emergency shelter" looked like? A symbol, a colored marker, a board with text? | ||
| 8 | 2025-09-18 08:32 | commented | -=|MisterY|=- ♦819 | @PPete2, I don't remember exactly but I would swear that there was a painted "Notlager" on the rock and also a sign on a pole nearby. Perhaps also something before the actual place. It is quite an important shelter in case of bad weather. Here, I found some photos: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgC7kZMwDECWmg4KbVmQxs4-WTv3FqIcObXrIQFq_frHvK_VjhTqEBdwz7asQ4fbUWYzE2eY5gzDBz5u1yx8y7KoLyPwrjy8Swey6G8U9gu-B_51wZsILRpE1uqyIUX20QktKw4gIQaKho/d/IMG_7539.JPG Unfortunately, I did not make any at that spot but there might be more on the net. https://f.hikr.org/files/3842425l.jpg | ||
| 9 | 2025-09-18 08:34 | commented | -=|MisterY|=- ♦819 | and, to be honest, I would not call it a cave. Barely two people can squeeze in there. But whatever. | ||
| 10 | 2025-09-18 14:18 | commented | Woazboat ♦363 | Thanks for the pictures! To clarify, the issues I saw here initially were: 1) Descriptive name (now fixed) 2) Potentially a random cave being mistagged as a rock shelter. I've unfortunately encountered this before where someone randomly added the rock shelter tag to a cave where it wasn't very fitting. In this case with your explanation and the pictures there's no doubt that it is actually very appropriate here. I didn't necessarily mean to say that it should be re-tagged as a cave, just questioning if the rock shelter tag was correct. If it's just an overhang, then I agree that it shouldn't be tagged as a cave. Thanks for your help | ||
| 11 | 2025-09-29 08:02 | closed | PPete2 ♦6,204 | What I can see from the photo, the tagging is correct now, since its both - an entrance of a small cave as well as a dedicated shelter, with description = "Notlager". So we can close the note | ||
| 4881473 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-29 10:00 | opened | Cycleguy13 ♦237 | Verlassener Lift? via StreetComplete 61.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/294418.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-14 16:48 | closed | Woazboat ♦363 | Bereits eingetragen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238540399 | ||
| 4961987 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-14 16:00 | opened | Woazboat ♦363 | Ist `tourism=alpine_hut` hier richtig? Sollte nur so getaggt werden wenn die Hütte regulär bewirtschaftet wird (Essen + Schlafplatz wird angeboten). Zweifelhaft ob das hier der Fall ist. Wenn nicht sollte der Tag geändert/entfernt werden. https://www.bergrettung-koeflach.at/ "Die Hütte ist als Schutzhütte ausgerichtet und bietet einen Winterraum und einen Schlafplatz für den Notfall." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut | Is `tourism=alpine_hut` correct here? It should only be tagged as such if the hut is regularly operated (offering food and accommodation). Doubtful whether this is the case here. If not, the tag should be changed or removed. https://www.bergrettung-koeflach.at/ "The hut is designed as a shelter and offers a winter room and an emergency sleeping place." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut |
| 4940832 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-09-01 12:28 | opened | gremay ♦1 | "Permanently Closed" OSM snapshot date: 2025-06-08T00:18:23Z POI name: Burgerista POI types: cuisine-burger amenity-restaurant #organicmaps android | |
| 2 | 2025-09-11 11:38 | closed | Woazboat ♦363 | Already tagged as closed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4159737565 | ||
| 4802521 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-12 12:59 | opened | F10sh ♦309 | I am quite sure that this is not a campsite. But I don't want to simply remove the node. What could it be? | |
| 2 | 2025-06-12 13:00 | commented | F10sh ♦309 | @7of9 | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-11 11:33 | commented | Woazboat ♦363 | Pretty sure this is just a spot where someone put up a tent once and not a regular campsite. I'd just remove it. | ||
| 4 | 2025-09-14 10:54 | closed | F10sh ♦309 | |||
| 4844382 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-08 09:13 | opened | bergfex0 | Hallo von bergfex, Zur Halterhütte folgende Meldung: Die Hütte ist keine Schutzhütte, befindet sich im Wasserschutzgebiet,ist ohne Wasser,erfüllt keine gesetzlichen Auflagen für einen Ausschank und ist seit dem Vorjahr geschlossen. >> Bitte das alpine_hut entfernen! | Hello from bergfex, To the Halterhütte the following message: The hut is not a shelter, is located in a water protection area, has no water, does not meet legal requirements for serving and has been closed since last year. >> Please remove the alpine_hut! |
| 2 | 2025-09-09 22:47 | closed | Woazboat ♦363 | tourism=alpine_hut von Halterhütte und Graualm entfernt https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171708989 Die in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4808790 erwähnte Löschung wurde anscheinend nicht gespeichert. | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-09 22:47 | reopened | Woazboat ♦363 | |||
| 4 | 2025-09-09 22:54 | commented | Woazboat ♦363 | Ist der Status der Leitenalm östlich davon bekannt? Diese ist seit 8 Jahren auch als alpine_hut eingetragen, aber es lässt sich online sehr wenig dazu finden und es gibt keine Erwähnung einer Bewirtschaftung. Ich vermute einmal dass diese auch falsch eingetragen ist. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243025732 | ||
| 4874616 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | 2025-07-25 15:12 | opened | giefingl | der Gipfel und die Höhenlinien passen nicht zusammen... #OsmAnd | The summit and the contour lines do not match... |
| 2 | 2025-09-09 22:05 | closed | Woazboat ♦363 | Schaut am LiDAR Höhenmodell relativ passend aus. Die Höhenlinien in OsmAnd können teilweise etwas ungenau sein. | ||
| 4920476 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-20 17:07 | opened | --- | shipwreck of The Primrose is here and visible on sat. https://geosat.space/blog/the-mystery-of-north-sentinel-islandthe-primrose-shipwreck-and-the-sentinels/ https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/hair-raising-story-behind-mysterious-shipwreck-off-north-sentinel-island/7UWWHDCA35XKJ2Q3PGRXMBXYNQ/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Sentinel_Island#Shipwrecks | |
| 2 | 2025-08-25 14:07 | closed | Woazboat ♦363 | wrong location and it's already mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120523928 | ||
| 4126479 | 1 | 2024-02-24 18:48 | opened | --- | the footway doesnt display the reality. There are missing tags for the blind. and furthermore on the whole street there are missing parking spots. well whats the mappers source? | |
| 2 | 2024-02-26 23:14 | commented | thopf ♦725 | Employees, working on the construction sites, parking cars on the site of the street. Nevertheless there are NO explicit parking spots in this street. | ||
| 3 | 2025-06-22 12:57 | commented | Woazboat ♦363 | Is there still anything left to be resolved for this note or can it be closed? | ||
| 4 | 2025-06-22 22:05 | closed | thopf ♦725 | In my opinion, the node can be closed. | ||
| 4798746 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-10 11:09 | opened | GO_E ♦3 | Unable to answer "Do you have to pay to park here?" – Dr. Lukas Klatil (Street-side Parking) – https://osm.org/way/200446828 via StreetComplete 61.1: Privatparkplatz | Private parking lot |
| 2 | 2025-06-22 12:55 | closed | Woazboat ♦363 | Ist bereits korrekt als `access=customers` eingetragen | ||
| 4757123 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-13 16:35 | opened | KiloanEmpress | There is no road here and it misleads bikers | |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 12:21 | commented | Luzandro ♦2,227 | this was definitely the driveway to the event center and a much-used bike route last year (see Strava heatmap), which I used myself some months ago - what's there instead now in your opinion? I've changed it to highway=service though, to be consistent with the northern section | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-15 12:48 | commented | KiloanEmpress | it's actually that little road to the south just barely of the dot, it says Angerstraße. It may have been a path for work vehicles to be parked on their property, but it most certainly isn't a road, there is also no access at all (not talking about the entrance road again) and it makes passersby think they can cut over cause it seems to go around the event center. Thanks for the help though, its my first time trying to help our bikers. | ||
| 4 | 2025-05-15 13:17 | commented | Luzandro ♦2,227 | it was public a few years ago. I've removed the name, apart from that it's tagged as private track with the corresponding gates and fences | ||
| 5 | 2025-05-15 15:25 | commented | KiloanEmpress | thanks!! | ||
| 6 | 2025-06-22 12:53 | closed | Woazboat ♦363 | I assume this is resolved | ||
| 4804105 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-13 10:24 | opened | stellarrrr ♦52 | In context of overlay "Surfaces" – Murpromenade (Foot Path) – https://osm.org/way/810257231 via StreetComplete_ee 61.1: Wegen Radfahren usw siehe Bild Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/284119.jpg | Due to cycling etc. see picture |
| 2 | 2025-06-22 12:44 | closed | Woazboat ♦363 | Ist eh als `highway=footway`eingetragen auf dem Radfahren standardmäßig nicht erlaubt ist | ||
| 4324270 | 1 | 2024-07-08 09:20 | opened | FabioCordenons | Here the trucks traffic should be restricted ( maxweight=7.5) except destination/origin transportation https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2673035,15.331073,3a,23.6y,58.39h,91.89t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sioc-D9qzv62RtaKtKRZZNA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205409&entry=ttu | |
| 2 | 2025-06-19 21:49 | commented | Woazboat ♦363 | Looks like you already added the restriction? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190516863 | ||
| 4344521 | 1 | 2024-07-22 07:25 | opened | RoadBird ♦37 | Unable to answer "What’s the name of this street?" for https://osm.org/way/1243312998 via StreetComplete 55.0: Nur Verbreiterung d. Bahnhofstraße. Als LKW Umkehr. | |
| 2 | 2025-02-07 12:41 | closed | Woazboat ♦363 | Separaten Weg entfernt und turning cicle node direkt auf die Straße gelegt | ||
| 4346231 | 1 | 2024-07-23 07:27 | opened | RoadBird ♦37 | Haus Nr. 28 existiert nicht mehr. Fläche mittlerweile völlig anders verbaut. Mehrere Wohnhäuser, Carports, Parkplätze usw. via StreetComplete 58.2 | |
| 2 | 2025-02-07 12:38 | commented | Woazboat ♦363 | Neue Häuser sind eingetragen, möglicherweise nicht ganz vollständig da sie auf dem Luftbild teilweise noch in Bau sind | ||
| 3358669 | 1 | 2022-09-13 21:16 | opened | Woazboat ♦363 | Hauptplatz wurde umgestaltet. Bushaltestelle(n) sind nun direkt an der Straße vor Florist Hammer. 'service' Schleife durch Fußgängerzone existiert nicht mehr. Bus route relations müssen verlegt werden. | |
| 2 | 2023-05-26 13:33 | commented | eriosw ♦346 | Die Busrouten in den Relationen habe ich verlegt. Die Route der Linie 760 ist noch unvollständig da ich den genauen Verlauf nicht kenne. | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-07 10:27 | commented | PPete2 ♦6,204 | Haltestelle und Relationen hier sind aber inzwischen ok, kann man die Note daher zu machen? | ||
| 4 | 2025-02-07 12:08 | closed | eriosw ♦346 | |||
| 5 | 2025-02-07 12:14 | reopened | Woazboat ♦363 | |||
| 6 | 2025-02-07 12:18 | commented | Woazboat ♦363 | Ist schon etwas her seitdem ich das letzte Mal dort war, aber https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33138074 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33138223 existiert so in der Form soweit ich mich erinnern kann nicht mehr. Glaube das ist jetzt alles Fußgängerzone. | ||
| 7 | 2025-02-20 09:25 | closed | PPete2 ♦6,204 | Laut Gemeindeanfrage gibt es die Straße noch, ist nun eine Begegungszone, also auch für Autos erlaubt |