| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5521655 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 24 days ago | opened | purplesharpiemarker | "Should be “street” not “avenue”" OSM snapshot date: 2026-08-26T01:30:29Z POI has no name POI types: building-address #organicmaps ios 2026.09.05-5-ios |
| 2 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,134 | see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5521656 Yes I see st not avenue on photographs, though the "southeast"/"se" is not resolved yet... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | jumbanho ♦528 | I changed this to "Fairmount Street" as the street signs don't show a directionality. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | ||
| 5521656 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 24 days ago | opened | purplesharpiemarker | "Should be “street” not “avenue”" OSM snapshot date: 2026-08-26T01:30:29Z POI name: Southeast Fairmount Avenue POI types: psurface-paved_good hwtag-nosidewalk highway-residential #organicmaps ios 2026.09.05-5-ios |
| 2 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,134 | see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5521655 | |
| 3 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | ||
| 4236652 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Yotsen ♦37 | These sidewalks don't exist via StreetComplete 57.2 |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,134 | interesting. This is actually marked for a snowmobile route... however I think this is wrong as the snowmobile probably can just follow the path of the road and not have to use this off-road nonexistent path... I'd vote to delete but wonder about opinions of other mappers/ | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,432 | The Bing Streetside imagery looks terrible but I don't see any trails/sidewalks along the road | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | jumbanho ♦528 | There are a lot of these trails in MN. Someone imported the trails from the MN Dept. of Natural Resources many years ago with the incorrect tags. I think they should just be tagged winter_road, but should definitely not be tag as paths or tracks | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,417 | Snowmobile paths usually cut across farmland and don't follow the roads necessarily. They would only be visible in winter and on official maps. | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Railing0547 ♦37 | Yeah this is not a side walk on either side | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Hypsometric ♦4,526 | I have seen many like this but am not sure how to tag them. In this case (and many others) the ditch is used and there is no trail except in winter. I came across one instance of someone stating to use "highway=path + seasonal=winter + snowmobile=yes/designated". But I have never found anything very definitive. It would be nice if there was a standard for this similar to tagging a road with cycleway:right=*. | |
| 8 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦16,175 | looks like @jumbanho cleaned this up a couple months ago | |
| 9 | ~ 14 days ago | reopened | gpserror ♦12,134 | ||
| 10 | ~ 14 days ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,134 | Looks changed but is it actually tagged properly and routable? Something still seems off... | |
| 11 | ~ 11 days ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | I tagged based on the wiki instructions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:piste:type=snowmobile these are winter only features that only show up on routers/renderers that specialize in snowmobiles. (note that I know of none of these that exist for minnesota) | |
| 12 | ~ 6 days ago | reopened | newtonpud ♦9 | ||
| 13 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | dannmer ♦23,432 | ||
| 5521402 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 25 days ago | opened | jumbanho ♦528 | gate #OsmAnd |
| 5471948 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | SA13 ♦3 | "Now open! Construction is complete." OSM snapshot date: 2026-07-14T00:42:02Z POI has no name POI types: highway-construction hwtag-oneway #organicmaps android 2026.07.23-6-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | Fixed | |
| 5364326 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Pine_Trees ♦58 | Unable to answer "Is there a shelter at this stop?" – 21 Av S (Bus Stop) – https://osm.org/node/622228032 via StreetComplete 63.1: duplicate stop |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | I merged the two stops | |
| 5379168 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | conorl738 ♦3 | This place does not exist: "Closed" A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-06-03T15:31:04Z POI name: Rollicious POI types: amenity building:part cuisine-japanese cuisine-vegan cuisine-vegetarian amenity-restaurant #CoMaps android 2026.06.05-11-Google |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | Looks like this has been fixed by using amenity:disused | |
| 5314825 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | ianrbuck ♦155 | In context of overlay "Places" – Marathon (Gas Station) – https://osm.org/way/170056062 via StreetComplete_ee 63.1: Gas station is gone, this is a parking lot now. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | jumbanho ♦528 | Paved gas station and put up a parking lot. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | ianrbuck ♦155 | Lol. I removed the gas station and added the parking lot. | |
| 4978057 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | ColeJam ♦3 | There is now a new Cub Foods in this location. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | jumbanho ♦528 | Added outline and amenity. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | NerdHerd88 | ||
| 5325046 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | MNMomRunner | Nichols road ends where I dropped this comment. The road ends, is blocked by gates and says Road Ends. It does not continue South like on the map. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | jumbanho ♦528 | Made access private and added barrier | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | ||
| 5284898 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | Gooser3000 ♦3 | Unable to answer "What surface does this road have?" – Service Road – https://osm.org/way/933842509 via StreetComplete 63.1: Not a road |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | removed | |
| 5314659 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | ianrbuck ♦155 | The shape of this pool seems totally different now. via StreetComplete_ee 63.1 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | I compared to Hennepin County Orthoimagery from 2025 and it looks good. | |
| 5314662 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | ianrbuck ♦155 | Unable to answer "Is this path one-way for bicycles? In which direction?" – Sidewalk – https://osm.org/way/370622902 via StreetComplete_ee 63.1: Not specifically for bikes, but not prohibited, either. What's the tag for that? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | jumbanho ♦528 | I would say bicycle=yes is fine. Is there an explicit bike speed limit on Minneapolis sidewalks? I think it is either implicitly or explicitly at walking speed, which would be maxspeed:bicycle=walk | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | The other option would be bicycle=permissive, but those are usually situations where a property owner doesn't disallow people using a path, but could decide to forbid it. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | reopened | jumbanho ♦528 | ||
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ion_chi ♦393 | bicycle=yes seems more correct | |
| 5308118 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | jumbanho ♦528 | bridge out #OsmAnd |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | Fixed map | |
| 5285027 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | jumbanho ♦528 | is this Jupipter or Jupiter? #OsmAnd |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦16,175 | Streetside says jupiter | |
| 5256059 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | Rik Shaw ♦2 | "Side by side residential duplex. 1983 / 1985" OSM snapshot date: 2026-01-22T18:08:18Z POI has no name POI types: building-address #CoMaps android 2026.04.07-8 |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | jumbanho ♦528 | added addresses as entrances | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | ||
| 5256058 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | Rik Shaw ♦2 | This place does not exist: "Side by side residential duplex" A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-01-22T18:08:18Z POI has no name POI types: building #CoMaps android 2026.04.07-8 |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | Added address points as addresses | |
| 4959031 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Agoraphilic ♦140 | This complex really should be broken up into multiple buildings via StreetComplete 61.3 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Why? I don't see separate buildings in the aerial imagery. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Agoraphilic ♦140 | This is taken from Cleveland. On the left side is more building=office and the right part is more building=industrial. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/305695.jpg | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | Okay, but if they're both together in a single building, shouldn't they remain mapped as a single building? (one feature, one OSM element: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element) If there is a really distinct office (perhaps with a different name than "Metro Transit Overhaul Base"), I think that could be mapped as a node within the building. But I still don't agree with splitting a building based on the distinct parts of it. Maybe you could do something with building:part if you really wanted? | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | (on reread: sorry if that came off as overly abrasive, sometimes I express myself in a very argumentative way! Thanks, and happy mapping!) | |
| 6 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | jumbanho ♦528 | I think one could make the whole building tagged as building=yes, then add two separate outlines within that tagged as building:part=office and building:part=industrial. | |
| 7 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,039 | That sounds good https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jumbanho. Not sure where the split between the parts is though, I don't have on-the-ground experience at this location. Feel free to add. | |
| 8 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | I added a building:part office for the SE portion of the building. I think it is fine to keep the whole building tagged as industrial. | |
| 5191886 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | ArtieFrump ♦3 | Unable to answer "Are these opening hours still correct?" – Kai Shin Clinic (Clinic) – https://osm.org/node/6264952645 via StreetComplete 63.0: This is not their clinic location, but their admin office. Not sure how to adjust but this location is not open to the public |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | Changed to an office amenity and removed opening hours. | |
| 3471440 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | ivanbranco ♦14,055 | what are these elements? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,134 | probably things that shouldn't be mapped, at least they don't show up in carto... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | evdence ♦193 | we could remove them, i dont see a reason for them to be here | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | Deleted | |
| 3718540 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | Molandfreak ♦106 | Bridgewater Heights is part of the city of Dundas, and the city limits do connect. |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | This appears to be correct in the current data | |
| 3852055 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | Yotsen ♦37 | will be a neighborhood here, or maybe there already is because my aerial imagery is a year old |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | jumbanho ♦528 | Streets added, but names needed. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | Added names | |
| 5099989 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | jumbanho ♦528 | Unable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" – Mark Wilkinson Furniture (Furniture Store) – https://osm.org/node/7390300056 via StreetComplete 62.1: Now called The Rug Company |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | harg ♦4,280 | The Rug Company is mapped at number 124 and their web site https://uk.therugcompany.com/london-holland-park/ shows a photo of it occupying only the corner shop ie number 124. Mark Wilkinson was mapped as number 126 which would be the white building just to the left of that photo. Are you saying that the rug company now occupies both shops? Also have a look at Urchin mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/790513439/ which claims to be number 126 but the web site says it is "on pause until Autumn 2026". Maybe it has expanded into what was Mark Williamson. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | Sorry for the confusion, I was using StreetComplete, didn't see Mark Wilkinson, and just assumed that the Rug Company had replaced it. Closing | |
| 4279795 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | jumbanho ♦528 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – Alarm Products Distributors (Security Office) – https://osm.org/node/6456665439 via StreetComplete 58.0: Terra Firma building company |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | fixed! | |
| 5096990 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Themis3000 ♦7 | It doesn't seem right that there are two different schools on this same building by different names. Could someone with some knowledge about this church confirm if this is accurate, or provide a correction? |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | Removed one that was older and who's website was dead. | |
| 4111919 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | RedAuburn ♦6,323 | lots of duplicate castles here, need to convert to single area |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | jumbanho ♦528 | The church also needs to be reunited. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | I've at least created one building and used some building:parts for the little bits. | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | reopened | jumbanho ♦528 | ||
| 5 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | jumbanho ♦528 | Reopening because I realized this note might refer to all the | |
| 6 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | jumbanho ♦528 | Separate parts of Dover castle that have historic=castle on them. | |
| 5056313 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | changefool ♦1 | "The Sonder Shaker rebranded into Celio around April 2025. However Celio is temporarily closed." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-11-09T01:21:36Z POI name: Sonder Shaker POI types: amenity-bar #organicmaps ios 2025.11.11-5-ios |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | updated to celio and a closed restaurant | |
| 5042164 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | conorl738 ♦3 | "No longer there" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-10-04T01:14:47Z POI name: Purple Onion Café POI types: internet_access-wlan amenity-cafe cuisine-coffee_shop #organicmaps android 2025.10.23-22-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | Removed | |
| 4584153 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | IonicBond ♦107 | Bus stop for Jefferson Lines right here at this corner. This is not part of Minneapolis's bus system. Jefferson Lines is its own thing. Not sure how to map this, but I will look later once I'm able to check what they called this bus stop and see if I can figure it out. If not I'll update this note about it. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | jumbanho ♦528 | I think you can just add a bus stop and then have operator=Jefferson Lines add any route and stop name/number also | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | Added | |
| 1361925 | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | opened | azdle ♦9 | Note: 2929 is over the main entrance for The Link (the apartment complex part) on University. There is also ground level retail with other addresses. There's another entrance with 2900 on the opposite side, but it's not clear what, if anything, that address is for. |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | jumbanho ♦528 | Removed address from the building as there are too many addresses within building. |