| Note | # | Tmstmp UTC | Event | Contributor | Comment | Auto-translation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4881842 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-29 15:06 | opened | KloBR | Battersea Reach is not in the water, nor is it in the Hammersmith and Fulham borough of London. It is situated on Juniper Drive, SW18, which is in the borough of Wandsworth. | |
| 2 | 2026-01-14 08:58 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Has it occurred to you that the address on Juniper Drive might be named after this part of the River Thames? The name will have been in use for centuries, along with Chelsea Reach, Nine Elms Reach, Lambeth Reach, etc. It's shown on an out-of-copyright OS 25 inch map from 1892-1914 here: https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/side-by-side/#zoom=17.1&lat=51.47332&lon=-0.17957&layers=168&right=osm | ||
| 4825704 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-25 23:46 | opened | UKChris ♦275 | Should this road be marked as "access all: no", with yes for "foot" and "bike"? | |
| 2 | 2026-01-14 08:53 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | The current access tagging looks like a reasonable interpretation of The Hammersmith and Fulham (South Fulham Low Traffic Neighbourhood) (Eastern Side) (Prescribed Routes) Order 2022 ( https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3968030 ). The access tags used are motor_vehicle=permit + bus=yes + taxi=yes Using access=no is usually wrong unless a road is actually subject to a long-term closure. Traffic restrictions usually apply to vehicle=* or motor_vehicle=* with only the signed exceptions needed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007426592 | ||
| 4881837 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-29 15:01 | opened | --- | Battersea Reach is not in the water, nor is it in the Hammersmith and Fulham borough of London. It is situated on Juniper Drive, SW18, which is in the borough of Wandsworth. | |
| 2 | 2026-01-14 08:39 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Has it occurred to you that the address on Juniper Drive might be named after this part of the River Thames? https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/side-by-side/#zoom=17.1&lat=51.47332&lon=-0.17957&layers=168&right=osm | ||
| 5128033 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2026-01-13 15:56 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Bazalgette Embankment reported to have (re-) opened 2026-01-13 | |
| 5126734 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2026-01-12 15:17 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | In context of overlay "Surfaces" – Maidenstone Hill (Residential Road) – https://osm.org/way/1466481490 via StreetComplete 62.1: This terrace may be Dutton Street Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/323679.jpg | |
| 2 | 2026-01-13 07:34 | commented | harg ♦3,494 | Your photo clearly shows that the number 29 wheelie bin is in Dutton Street but less obviously there is also a Dutton Street sign on the corner where number 21 is mapped. And in fact, number 21 is already mapped as Dutton Street. I've remapped the entire stretch accordingly. But there's a remaining question: what is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466481244/ ? I suspect it's also not Maidenstone Hill because it no longer joins to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466481244/ | ||
| 3 | 2026-01-13 12:34 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | According to both OS Open USRN and OS Open Roads, the road name is Maidenstone Hill from Blackheath Hill to 31/33 Dutton Street, then continues to the junction with Point Hill. There's also a spur connecting to Dutton Street further up ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10403268 ). This appears to be one of those anomalies where house numbering and street naming conflict. I think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466481490 could be tagged with: name=Maidenstone Hill name:right=Dutton Street Several existing streets have been renamed, which may explain some of the confusion. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/side-by-side/#zoom=19.4&lat=51.47335&lon=-0.01296&layers=168&right=osm https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/side-by-side/#zoom=19.4&lat=51.47335&lon=-0.01296&layers=173&right=osm | ||
| 4 | 2026-01-13 13:51 | commented | harg ♦3,494 | To be certain, it would help to have all the currently untagged housenumbers for both streets, which would probably show a discontinuity where the exact joins are. | ||
| 5 | 2026-01-13 14:11 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | With the benefit of hindsight, I wish I'd spent more time walking around the surrounding streets. I'll try to go back in the next few weeks. | ||
| 4170248 | 1 | 2024-03-27 16:28 | opened | Helge Kreutzmannn ♦1,347 | Unable to answer "How many bicycles can be parked here?" – Bicycle Parking – https://osm.org/node/414112807 via StreetComplete 57.1: There is no bike parking in the bridge Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/203617.jpg | |
| 2 | 2026-01-13 10:54 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | I suspect that these cycle stands are at platform level under the bridge (they are tagged with covered=yes ), rather than on the bridge, where they should also have been tagged with layer=1 Are you happy for me to close this note? | ||
| 5119156 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2026-01-06 01:40 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What are the actual access restrictions and type of modal filter here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13344338810 | |
| 2 | 2026-01-12 15:27 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Lockable bollard, so motor_vehicle=private Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/323680.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2026-01-13 01:20 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | |||
| 5126721 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2026-01-12 15:08 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unmapped path behind gardens via StreetComplete 62.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/323676.jpg | |
| 2 | 2026-01-12 21:43 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177154399 | ||
| 5126713 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2026-01-12 15:00 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unmapped access to flats, steps down at far end via StreetComplete 62.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/323675.jpg | |
| 2 | 2026-01-12 21:43 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177154399 | ||
| 5126707 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2026-01-12 14:57 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | informal path, dirt, unlit via StreetComplete 62.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/323674.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rskedgell/traces/12155381 | |
| 2 | 2026-01-12 21:43 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177154399 | ||
| 5126671 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2026-01-12 14:42 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Decorative sidewalk needs connecting to crossing + speed table here via StreetComplete 62.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/323673.jpg | |
| 5124319 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2026-01-10 15:59 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Temporary closure of Acton Mews N of Dunston Street for building work. via StreetComplete 62.1 | |
| 5120539 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2026-01-07 07:56 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | There are two buildings both mapped as 1-31 Portia Way. Is this correct? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227869643 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227869652 | |
| 2 | 2026-01-08 16:26 | commented | harg ♦3,494 | All other buildings to the east of Portia Way are even numbered, so the error must be way 227869652 which should probably be 2-10 even. But I'm also puzzled that node/3923656646 claims entrance to 49-63. a) There must be an unmapped entrance(s) to 1-15. b) mapping housenumbers to entrances is good and should be done more often, but then way 227869643 should not duplicate the housenumbers claimed by its entrance. c) is this the sole entrance to 49-63? | ||
| 2633986 | 1 | 2021-04-22 15:37 | opened | _dsm ♦46 | is there a destination access for drivers? could you verify please? | |
| 2 | 2026-01-06 15:18 | commented | Mex ♦7,352 | there is an advisory sign one end of this road saying it's for village access only, but no restrictions that I can see. the current access:destination might be a bit strong a tagging? | ||
| 3 | 2026-01-06 16:27 | commented | Mex ♦7,352 | removed destination tagging, but leaving this open as other tagging such as width restrictions should probably be added | ||
| 4 | 2026-01-06 19:04 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | At the roundabout end of School Road there's a traffic_sign=GB:629 6'6" width restriction sign with a plate which I think says "except for access". That would suggest maxwidth=6'6" maxwidth:conditional=none @ destination https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1758926125018175 | ||
| 5 | 2026-01-08 10:11 | closed | _dsm ♦46 | Hi, Mex, rskedgell! Thanks for your responds and edits. Best, _dsm. | ||
| 3477618 | 1 | 2022-12-14 17:40 | opened | Gregory Williams ♦1,263 | Double-check maxspeed for Poppyfields and connecting roads. I think I saw it signed as 10 mph. | |
| 2 | 2026-01-06 16:56 | commented | EdLoach ♦2,800 | Poppyfields shows as 10 mph in https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1255555625959784 | ||
| 3 | 2026-01-06 18:51 | commented | Gregory Williams ♦1,263 | Thanks, I've updated the speed here now. I've assumed that it also applies to Towner Close and Littledale that are accessed from Poppyfields, but I'm unclear whether it applies to Ruglys Way, given that it can also be accessed from Tatchell Drive. I can't see a clear enough image of the entrance to Tatchell Drive in the Mapillary imagery to see whether there's a 10 mph sign there too. So I'll leave this open to check that. | ||
| 4 | 2026-01-06 19:00 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | I'd be inclined to add hazard=pedestrians (explicitly signed) and ownership=private (a public highway won't have a permanent 10mph speed limit). It may also be access=destination but I can't read all of the text on the street name sign. | ||
| 5 | 2026-01-09 18:00 | commented | Gregory Williams ♦1,263 | I've tagged the hazard and ownership now. I'll try to remember to look at the wording on the sign next time I'm passing. | ||
| 4617056 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-06 12:17 | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,966 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2389890388 Has Superdrug closed here? It is listed as closed every day https://www.superdrug.com/store/lion-plaza | |
| 2 | 2026-01-04 15:16 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Farmer J at no. 2, "coming soon" Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/322889.jpg | ||
| 5115315 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:45 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Passing place via StreetComplete 62.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/322730.jpg | |
| 2 | 2026-01-03 18:08 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176790457 | ||
| 5115300 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:30 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "What surface does this road have?" – Service Road – https://osm.org/way/657702496 via StreetComplete 62.1: Closed for building work Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/322729.jpg | |
| 2 | 2026-01-03 17:52 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176789877 | ||
| 5106563 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-12-27 10:51 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is Passatge d'Aragó really embankment=yes , access=customers, or any of the other changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164632699 ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311553358 | |
| 5102529 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-12-23 15:19 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – Adam (Currency Exchange) – https://osm.org/way/140334141 via StreetComplete 62.1: Adam is a "grooming atelier" separate from the Bureau de Change Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/321246.jpg | |
| 2512824 | 1 | 2021-01-26 09:56 | opened | --- | onosm.org submitted note from a business: name: Amnesty Fitness phone: 315-532-1999 website: http://www.AmnestyFitness.com/ twitter: facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AmnestyFitness/ email: hours: Monday - Sunday 5:00 AM - 8:00 PM category: Gyms address: Amnesty Fitness | |
| 2 | 2025-12-18 10:01 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Phone number in New York, US and dead website link | ||
| 5086901 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-12-11 08:21 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is this a substation? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1135446761 | |
| 4970736 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-20 13:52 | opened | F3_LX ♦21 | This is a splash park. Is there any better area tags to use other than just fountain? | |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 07:33 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | There's leisure=playground + playground=splash_pad https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground | ||
| 2751899 | 1 | 2021-07-12 12:48 | opened | --- | Holly Lodge | |
| 2 | 2025-12-03 10:04 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175438700 | ||
| 5073297 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-30 08:00 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Just a traffic_calming=island + crossing=no, no carriageway split needed here via StreetComplete_ee 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/318426.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-12-01 23:41 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175380197 | ||
| 5069922 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-27 10:18 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – The Little Thai (Thai Restaurant) – https://osm.org/node/1200018702 via StreetComplete 62.0: Now nine-o, POI needs shifting closer to Zamazingo Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/318092.jpg | |
| 5069921 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-27 10:16 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "Is there a shelter at this stop?" – Royal Free Hospital (Z) (Bus Stop) – https://osm.org/node/469779509 via StreetComplete 62.0: Location incorrect, actually opposite 138/138A Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/318091.jpg | |
| 5069913 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-27 10:11 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unmapped zebra crossing, pointless adding separate sidewalks if crossings are ignored #DecorativeSidewalkMapping via StreetComplete 62.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/318089.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-11-27 11:43 | closed | Mex ♦7,352 | connected this an some other crossings to the pavements | ||
| 5069908 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-27 10:07 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – Animal Crackers (Pet Store) – https://osm.org/node/831257424 via StreetComplete 62.0: A&M Restoration Conservation Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/318086.jpg | |
| 5069898 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-27 09:57 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – Vacant Shop – https://osm.org/node/831425965 via StreetComplete 62.0: Now residential? Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/318084.jpg | |
| 2067466 | 1 | 2020-01-24 14:33 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Proposed turn restriction at this junction for bicycles will ban cycles turning from Northumberland Avenue onto Victoria Embankment but not onto the CS3 cycle track and from CS3 onto Victoria Embankment. https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3478149 | |
| 2 | 2025-03-17 18:39 | commented | okwithmydecay ♦1,379 | Has there been any update on this? | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-26 14:28 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | I think this can safely be closed. | ||
| 4329207 | 1 | 2024-07-11 19:55 | opened | DaveF ♦693 | Why are these steps marked as private? The gate is open, isn't it? | |
| 2 | 2025-11-26 12:43 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | No idaa, they clearly aren't. Perhaps there was a closure associated with building works an access=private was added as a "temporary" restriction. Now fixed. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/317963.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/317964.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-26 14:27 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | |||
| 5067823 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-25 17:26 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Now (re-)opened as "Tyburn Quay"? | |
| 2 | 2025-12-26 20:53 | closed | RedAuburn ♦5,774 | was added as such: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175737015 | ||
| 5063960 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-22 17:45 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a barrier between Hillmorton Street and Byfield Drive? | |
| 5063959 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-22 17:44 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a barrier between Blisworth Road and Ferries Close? | |
| 5062656 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-21 16:34 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | This street has a Designated Street Name USRN, what is signed here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620888305 | |
| 5062113 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-21 11:08 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | This street has a Designated Street Name USRN, what is signed here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436356375 | |
| 5062094 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-21 10:36 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | This street has a Designated Street Name USRN, what is signed here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040909431 | |
| 5062092 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-21 10:35 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | This street has a Designated Street Name USRN, what is signed here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/938121586 | |
| 5062080 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-21 10:24 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What type of weight restriction is this? Are there any exceptions on the sign? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32071513 | |
| 5062024 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-21 09:44 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | This street has a Designated Street Name USRN, what is signed here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1005077367 | |
| 5054993 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-16 09:04 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Missing paths (asphalt, intermediate, ~1m, unlit) via StreetComplete 62.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/316672.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rskedgell/traces/12112474 | |
| 2 | 2025-11-19 09:53 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174850838 | ||
| 5054991 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-16 09:01 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Missing park entrance via StreetComplete 62.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/316671.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-11-19 09:53 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174850838 | ||
| 5054989 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-16 08:59 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Park entrance missing via StreetComplete 62.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/316669.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-11-19 09:52 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174850838 | ||
| 5056583 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-17 09:25 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Caledonian Sleeper Guest Lounge (approx position, may be in FHRS?) via StreetComplete 62.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/316877.jpg | |
| 4950813 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-07 12:25 | opened | Ratatapa | 0134 | |
| 2 | 2025-09-07 13:02 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please could you explain what the significance of "0134" is, as without any context it may be hard for any other mappers to interpret. Thanks. | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-09 19:15 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Without a response, there's nothing to do here. | ||
| 3662166 | 1 | 2023-04-27 10:16 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is Premier Place really private access, or private ownership with destination access? Is it gated? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194387798 | |
| 2 | 2023-08-10 14:13 | commented | bedenski | I can confirm it's not gated | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-09 18:24 | commented | harg ♦3,494 | Road is signed as private. No gates. Access=destination would seem reasonable. | ||
| 4 | 2025-11-09 19:13 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks, updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174432397 | ||
| 4400648 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-08-24 16:36 | opened | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | Is this building still vacant? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/654063659 | |
| 2 | 2024-11-11 17:29 | closed | TonyTraveller | |||
| 3 | 2024-11-11 17:29 | reopened | TonyTraveller | |||
| 4 | 2025-11-08 11:06 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Clear Drains (UK) Limited Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/315139.jpg | ||
| 4797352 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-09 13:48 | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,966 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/800600487 This looks like a pavement rather than a building housing a restaurant? I can't find a FSA rating for Chez Bob - does it exist? | |
| 2 | 2025-11-06 13:58 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | No sign of it here Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/314832.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-08 13:17 | closed | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,966 | Thanks - removed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174375864 | ||
| 5040769 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-06 13:53 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unconnected sidewalk stubs on Pond Street, should be fixed or deleted. via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 5033741 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-02 08:13 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Choker #2 via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/314119.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-11-03 07:06 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Already mapped as a chicane, further update in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174133183 | ||
| 5033740 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-02 08:12 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is this traffic_calming=choker mapped? via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/314118.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-11-03 07:06 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Already mapped as a chicane, further update in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174133183 | ||
| 5032591 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-01 12:13 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Mural on wall of #37 via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/314017.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-11-01 16:26 | commented | spiregrain ♦2,309 | It's this, but I added it as a way not a point, so it's likely mostly invisible to renderers. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/712267391 | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-02 15:04 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks. | ||
| 4870520 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | 2025-07-22 21:39 | opened | mgrant ♦2 | Step, impractical for bikes #OsmAnd | |
| 2 | 2025-10-26 14:23 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | If there's no signage to indicate that cycling is explicitly permitted (and I don't think there is), bicycle permeability isn't really an issue here. Does it present a barrier to wheelchair accessibility? | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-26 16:08 | commented | mgrant ♦2 | From memory, my issue wasn't that cycles weren't permitted, my issue was that it was impractical for bikes because in that tight space there was a bend and some steps. I think I had to pick my bike up for a few feet. There might have been a handrail (don't remember). My issue is really about routing in that it's probably best not to route bikes through this tight alley with the steps. It's not like there isn't a much better way around the other way. Feel free to delete this note if you think this issue is too minor. For me, it was just one of those "oh jeez, bikes shouldn't be routed down this" moments of frustration. | ||
| 4 | 2025-10-26 16:45 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | The note is useful because it identifies a problem. In this case, we have a path which has only been tagged as highway=footway since it was added to the map in 2008. It's never had any bicycle=* tags, so cycle routing software shouldn't be trying to use it in the first place. I appreciate that this was 3 months ago, but can you remember which routing software and profile you were using? In the mean time, it wouldn't hurt to add bicycle=no to the way. It's technically redundant and might not fix the underlying problem. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28982999/history | ||
| 5 | 2025-10-26 16:47 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | PS I'll try to go there tomorrow and add the step(s), which might also discourage bicycle routing. | ||
| 6 | 2025-10-26 22:12 | commented | mgrant ♦2 | Great. I hope I am not misremembering the step! Let me know what you find. I was using OsmAnd on my phone. I did some searching and it appears to have its own custom routing engine. | ||
| 7 | 2025-10-27 07:39 | commented | harg ♦3,494 | Mapping the steps (including the number of steps) and any other barrier is the correct solution. The router can then decide whether there is a better route. But even without the step mapped, the router is probably at fault if it is using a footway without instructing the cyclist to dismount for its entire length. If there's no better route, that would sometimes be a better alternative than a long detour, but the router should not be encouraging breaking the law if there is nothing to indicate that bicycles are legally permited. We don't have a bicycle=inconvenient tag and bicyle=no implies a specific legal prohibition according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle. So that would technically only be correct if there is signage or other evidence of the legal prohibition. | ||
| 8 | 2025-11-01 12:13 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | No steps on this section, just flat asphalt. No signs prohibiting or allowing cycling, so best left tagged as highway=footway without access tags. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/314016.jpg | ||
| 9 | 2025-11-01 18:26 | commented | spiregrain ♦2,309 | Any way to estimate a maxwidth for this? The similar path on the west side of Arundel Close can be measured from the cadastrals+NLS maps - but not this one. | ||
| 10 | 2025-11-27 09:20 | closed | spiregrain ♦2,309 | |||
| 3742525 | 1 | 2023-06-19 18:22 | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,966 | Karen Millen stores closed in 2019. | |
| 2 | 2025-10-28 11:45 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Changed from shop=clothes -> was:shop=clothes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169349294 | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-28 12:46 | closed | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,966 | Thank you. | ||
| 5023317 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-26 10:28 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "What’s the height of the curbs at this crossing?" – Unmarked Crossing – https://osm.org/node/7669419990 via StreetComplete 61.3: Crossing does not exist. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/312718.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-26 11:11 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173789314 | ||
| 5023319 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-26 10:28 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "What’s the height of the curbs at this crossing?" – Unmarked Crossing – https://osm.org/node/8431944265 via StreetComplete 61.3: Crossing does not exist | |
| 2 | 2025-10-26 11:11 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173789314 | ||
| 5023322 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-26 10:29 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "What’s the height of the curbs at this crossing?" – Unmarked Crossing – https://osm.org/node/8431944264 via StreetComplete 61.3: Crossing does not exist Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/312720.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-26 11:11 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173789314 | ||
| 5023329 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-26 10:31 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "What’s the height of the curbs at this crossing?" – Unmarked Crossing – https://osm.org/node/8431944261 via StreetComplete 61.3: Informal crossing with driveway/crossover and lowered kerb on S side Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/312721.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-26 11:11 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173789314 | ||
| 5023341 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-26 10:45 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "What surface does this road have?" – Service Road – https://osm.org/way/666060665 via StreetComplete 61.3: Disused - construction site Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/312724.jpg | |
| 2389911 | 1 | 2020-10-18 06:29 | opened | Bearded_Midget | Unable to answer "What is the name of this road?" for https://osm.org/way/4427271 via StreetComplete 24.2: Not given an official name as yet due to still building | |
| 2 | 2023-08-30 09:16 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | 2023-08 - still no USRN or entry in OS Open Names | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-19 13:23 | commented | Robert Whittaker ♦1,655 | It's been labelled as "Marsh Lane" in OSM. Can this be marked as resolved now? | ||
| 4 | 2025-10-20 12:41 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Yes, I think it can. | ||
| 5011666 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-18 10:33 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | No physical carriageway split here via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/311278.jpg | |
| 2237396 | 1 | 2020-06-21 18:38 | opened | tonybrown100 | Unable to answer "Is Ardwell Road lit here?" for https://osm.org/way/792839509 via StreetComplete 19.2: Ardwell Road does not continue into the central reservation of Streatham Hill | |
| 2 | 2025-10-15 22:18 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Quite often the sections of road between carriageways on dual carriageways "belong" to the dual carriageway and share it's USRN (Unique Street Reference Number), but in this case it matches the minor road. Updated and StreetComplete quest completed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173340484 | ||
| 5005775 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 13:10 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Private (ownership) roads via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310592.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-14 17:04 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | UPdated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173286103 | ||
| 5005827 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 13:30 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unlit, unpaved footpath outside park fence via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310598.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rskedgell/traces/12089037 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-14 16:49 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005827 | ||
| 4997637 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-09 09:29 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a footpath or alley between Waverley Avenue and Soper Close? If there is, is it inside or outside the park? Is there any signage to indicate that it's a public right of way? (Officially Described Street USRN 22808725) | |
| 2 | 2025-10-14 16:49 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005827 | ||
| 5005487 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 11:12 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Missing connection from Rale Lane (E) via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310531.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/310532.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/310533.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rskedgell/traces/12088951 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-14 16:39 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173285057 | ||
| 5005540 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 11:53 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Numbering here starts 44a (Hillview), 44, NOT at 8 via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-14 16:32 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173284734 | ||
| 5005881 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 14:05 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | If the separately drawn sidewalks here were useful rather than decorative, they'd be connected via this zebra crossing. via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310610.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-14 14:18 | closed | Mex ♦7,352 | fixed | ||
| 5005860 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 13:57 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Crossings here appear (from StreetComplete prompts) to be duplicated via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-14 14:18 | closed | Mex ♦7,352 | fixed | ||
| 5005828 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 13:32 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Soper Close gate and timed access restrictions via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310599.jpg | |
| 4459063 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-09-30 14:55 | opened | okwithmydecay ♦1,379 | Could someone check the access of this road and gate. The gate at the other end - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12211873663 - is locked and has a sign saying "keep out" | |
| 2 | 2025-10-14 13:15 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Also locked here Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310593.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-14 13:28 | closed | Mex ♦7,352 | already tagged correctly | ||
| 5005772 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 13:09 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Mandeville Court (Chingford) Sewage Pumping Station via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310591.jpg | |
| 5005665 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 12:38 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Wherlchair-unfriendly crossings, steps at ends via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310559.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-14 14:24 | commented | Mex ♦7,352 | sketched in | ||
| 5005656 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 12:32 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – Wine Lodge (Liquor Store) – https://osm.org/node/8741747884 via StreetComplete 61.3: Now part of Valley Side Supermarket? Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310553.jpg | |
| 5005639 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 12:29 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Missing crossing and footway connection between roads. via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310550.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-14 13:18 | closed | Mex ♦7,352 | added | ||
| 5003921 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-13 10:22 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What is the name of this new residential cul-de-sac off Kings Head Hill? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441849362 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-14 12:03 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Pino Way, updated with StreetComplete/SCEE | ||
| 5005551 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 11:58 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Footpath in front of properties, separated from sidewalk by grass slope with sets of steps connecting. Driveways at both ends, private (access) beyond path. via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310537.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rskedgell/traces/12088976 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-14 13:22 | closed | Mex ♦7,352 | added | ||
| 5005395 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 09:48 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – Trash Can – https://osm.org/node/7615765023 via StreetComplete 61.3: It's a street cabinet Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310522.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-14 10:37 | commented | Mex ♦7,352 | done | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-14 10:43 | closed | Mex ♦7,352 | |||
| 5005387 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 09:41 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Balmoral Road crossing incorrectly mapped as if there were a traffic island with a carriageway split via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310521.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-11-27 14:55 | closed | spiregrain ♦2,309 | have had a go at fixing | ||
| 5004236 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-13 13:42 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a short residential cul-de-sac off Eden Road here? (Designated Street Name USRN 22812125) | |
| 4985355 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-30 10:47 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a footpath or alley between Forest Drive West and Lambourne Road / Forest Road here? (Officially Described Street USRN 22804650) | |
| 2 | 2025-10-12 17:35 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173193004 | ||
| 4983941 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-29 09:15 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a footpath or alley between Carnanton Road and Grantock Road here? Is it signed as a public right of way? (Officially Described Street USRN 22804925) | |
| 2 | 2025-10-12 17:30 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173192833 | ||
| 4997701 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-09 10:15 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a path or alley between Westward Road and Maple Avenue here? If so, is there any signage to indicate that it is a public right of way? (Officially Described Street USRN 22806850) | |
| 2 | 2025-10-12 17:27 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173192683 | ||
| 4994817 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-07 14:04 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a footpath or alley between Hurst Avenue and Churchill Terrace here? (Officially Described Street USRN 22805830) | |
| 2 | 2025-10-12 17:23 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173192573 | ||
| 4984394 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-29 15:06 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a footpath or alley between Wyemead Crescent and Oaks Grove here? (Officially Described Street USRN 22807410) | |
| 2 | 2025-10-12 17:19 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173192373 | ||
| 5001965 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-12 08:02 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Building being demolished or redevoloped? via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310090.jpg | |
| 4870521 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | 2025-07-22 21:40 | opened | mgrant ♦2 | No bikes allowed on footpath #OsmAnd | |
| 2 | 2025-10-12 07:11 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | This is already tagged as highway=footway, so bikes are implicitly prohibited. If there's a sign here, it might be worth adding it as a node (traffic_sign=GB:951), together with bicycle=no + bicycle:signed=yes on the way. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8262802 | ||
| 5001887 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-12 06:41 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a crossing here, or is it just a traffic calming island? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12031246281 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-13 13:02 | closed | Mex ♦7,352 | visible on street image,added | ||
| 4519245 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-14 11:50 | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,966 | Has Pumpkin cafe closed? Can't find a FSA rating for it. This article says something was being planned to replace it https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/new-1960s-style-cafe-planned-28895740 | |
| 2 | 2024-11-14 15:14 | closed | MaxWolf12567 | |||
| 3 | 2024-12-04 14:22 | reopened | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,966 | |||
| 4 | 2024-12-04 14:22 | commented | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,966 | I'm not sure how this has been resolved? | ||
| 5 | 2025-10-11 10:34 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Now "Centenary Coffee & Co" | ||
| 6 | 2025-10-11 13:15 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated with StreetComplete, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3564582062/history | ||
| 4999503 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-10 14:32 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – https://osm.org/node/3564582057 via StreetComplete 61.3: No shop here, perhaps it was a temporary structure on the concourse? Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/309712.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-11 13:13 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173136717 | ||
| 4999512 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-10 14:38 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Construction site via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/309718.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-11 13:12 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173136621 | ||
| 4999513 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-10 14:39 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface of the sidewalk here?" – Station Square (Minor/Unclassified Road) – https://osm.org/way/951802442 via StreetComplete 61.3: Road closed, part of construction site | |
| 2 | 2025-10-10 14:40 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | No sign of constructi{n activity Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/309721.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-11 13:11 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173136621 | ||
| 5000454 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-11 08:56 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Missing path, asphalt, lit via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/309836.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/309837.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rskedgell/traces/12086253 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-11 12:48 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173135645 | ||
| 4962702 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-15 07:55 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What are the signed vehicle restrictions for the set down only service road at Coventry station? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/990570111 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-10 14:34 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | 3t goods vehicles, 2.4m width, drop off only (max 2 mins) Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/309715.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/309716.jpg | ||
| 2008843 | 1 | 2019-11-26 14:08 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | How does the Feltham Park cycle route (r9708949) continue between the park and Hillingdon Road East? Is there a dropped kerb onto the carriageway? | |
| 2 | 2025-10-07 19:48 | closed | Wey2go ♦50 | While there's a dropped kerb/curb there is also a gate that requires swinging; i'm not quite sure why you were incensed to write this as an editor has written it's a footpath for the final section purely and fairly obviously to discourage people thinking it was incredibly easy but everyone would appreciate your precision - I'll avoid their shorthand and fix as you say1 | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-07 21:06 | reopened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | |||
| 4 | 2025-10-07 21:20 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | I'm not quite sure why you think I was "incensed", you seem to be reading rather a lot into a note asking any OSM user for confirmation of the situation on the ground. A cycle route which is effectively a dead for cyclists looks odd, but these things do happen due to poor planning and design by local authorities. It's worth noting that the route relation which I was enquiring about was deleted 3 years ago. You've never edited it.https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9708949/history | ||
| 5 | 2025-10-08 19:50 | closed | Wey2go ♦50 | If the way is defunct this site no longer maps brief history or historic uses either, sadly. Grateful if you can avoid the big red x over the area staining its excellent mapping more generally and close your comment. I detailed more on the gate from actual inspection. I’ve said the curb is gone and you ignored me as you seized upon one word i used as emotive whereas i was just suggesting it’s no deal. It was no big deal as the way has gone it turns out. | ||
| 6 | 2025-10-08 20:59 | reopened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | |||
| 7 | 2025-10-08 21:01 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | You appear to have fundamentally misunderstood the purpose of notes in OSM. As for the area having excellent mapping generally, you may not be aware of the fiction, bad mapping and blatant copying from Google another mapper (thankfully now self-deleted) which had to be cleaned up by other mappers. | ||
| 8 | 2025-10-08 23:59 | reopened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | |||
| 9 | 2025-10-09 00:09 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Can I assume that you have misinterpreted the "big red x", which is the way the openstreetmap.org site represents an unresolved note, as if someone had somehow marked your work as incorrect? They're completely unrelated. This would still be the case even if you'd ever edited any of the objects in question before I added the note. Perhaps it would also help if you read this? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes | ||
| 4996633 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-08 17:37 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "How does this path cross the barrier here?" – https://osm.org/node/1813836267 via StreetComplete 61.3: Towpath and bridge railings are on different levels, no intersection. | |
| 2 | 2025-11-06 17:00 | closed | spiregrain ♦2,309 | seems to be tagged correctly | ||
| 4985381 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-30 11:16 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is Burghley Passage gated? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434339953 | |
| 3530248 | 1 | 2023-01-24 15:07 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is this building passage (w127925235) publicly accessible? #surveyme | |
| 2 | 2024-05-15 17:44 | commented | Peter Newman ♦2,819 | Yes it is | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-25 18:25 | commented | unzow ♦1,293 | This issue looks resolved to me, please double-check & close, thanks. | ||
| 4 | 2025-09-25 19:10 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | It does to me, too. | ||
| 5 | 2025-09-29 19:27 | reopened | Peter Newman ♦2,819 | |||
| 6 | 2025-09-29 19:28 | commented | Peter Newman ♦2,819 | Is it worth us adding access=yes given we've verified it's true? | ||
| 7 | 2025-09-30 07:35 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Possibly not, as that would imply a legal right of way. It's harder to find out in inner London, but as it doesn't have a USRN there probably isn't any evidence that it's a public highway or a PRoW. It might be foot=permissive, if the owner of the building through which it passes could choose to gate it. | ||
| 4983103 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-28 15:22 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | This gate is mapped at the intersection of Albany Road, Wenlock Mews and an unnamed footway, which of these is it actually on? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/339857204 | |
| 4982631 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-28 11:01 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a footpath between Sinnott Road and Lawrence Avenue here? Is it signed as a public right of way? (Officially Described Street USRN 22808000) | |
| 4868416 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-21 17:16 | opened | Helge Kreutzmannn ♦1,347 | Unable to answer "Is this bicycle parking covered (protected from rain)?" – Bicycle Parking – https://osm.org/node/10267752703 via StreetComplete 61.1: This is in private property und edet a roof, but from outside I do not see an explicit bicycle parking space.. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/292521.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-25 09:05 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | The cycle parking node was added as part of the TfLCID import. The photos from TfL's original survey taken on 2017-06-28 are at: https://cycleassetimages.data.tfl.gov.uk/RWG057641_1.jpg and https://cycleassetimages.data.tfl.gov.uk/RWG057641_2.jpg I've added a check_date tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10267752703 | ||
| 4870003 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-22 15:40 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Have any of the crossings here been changed from pelican (pedestrian only) to toucan (explicitly shared bicycle and pedestrian) since the most recent Mapillary imagery was captured on 2022-07-28? #surveyme | |
| 2 | 2025-09-21 16:05 | commented | dankarran ♦788 | Checked today, still pelican crossings | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-22 07:36 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks! I've bumped the check_date tag on the crossing ways and nodes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172278702 | ||
| 4972644 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-21 09:49 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Footway separated by verge shpuld be mapped via StreetComplete_ee 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/306290.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rskedgell/traces/12069770 | |
| 2 | 2025-09-21 14:23 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172248892 | ||
| 4968564 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-19 09:20 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | The sign visible before this bridge in Bing street side imagery appears to show a maximum gross weight limit for all vehicles and a maximum axle load, but the resolution is too poor to be confident. What are the signed restrictions here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/952480151 https://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=51.401609%7E-3.245786&lvl=20.5&mo=om.1&pi=-13.1&style=x&dir=311.2 | |
| 2007762 | 1 | 2019-11-25 11:30 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is Lush Tiles, Staines Road (n6367375784) still open, or permanently closed? | |
| 2 | 2025-09-17 13:40 | commented | threefoursixninefour ♦40 | G* Maps and street level imagery suggests currently closed | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-18 15:58 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | As both my Mapillary images from 2019 and Bing street side show it as closed, I've updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172120808 | ||
| 4967573 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-18 14:41 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a signed weight limit here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23754085 | |
| 4965800 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-17 10:21 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there an HGV weight restriction sign near the junction of Tamnadesse Road (Tamnadeese Road?) near its junction with Boyne Row and if so, what weight? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075860533 | |
| 4964469 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-16 11:42 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What sign is used for the 7.5t weight restriction on the Fallowfield Loop bridge over Hyde Road - HGV only, or "weak bridge"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817909942 | |
| 4964389 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-16 10:57 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | This bridge has been separately surveyed as having no signed weight limit and a 7.5t HGV weight limit, which is correct? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27928963 | |
| 2 | 2025-09-24 10:25 | commented | Paul Berry ♦2,118 | There is no signing specific to the bridge itself but the road crossing it is subject to a conditional weight limit, signed from the centre of Godmanchester. Tagging updated to reflect this. | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-24 10:25 | closed | Paul Berry ♦2,118 | Resolved on changeset #172386123. | ||
| 4963194 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-15 13:25 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | The Bing street side imagery available on 2025-09-15 shows both a 13t mgw HGV restriction sign (626.2A) and an older 13t weight restriction (626.1). If the older signs have been removed, the maxweight=13 and maxweight:bus=13 tags should be removed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442969519 | |
| 4846763 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-09 19:36 | opened | Kimono My House ♦20 | Unable to answer "What’s the structure of this bridge?" – Bridge Area – https://osm.org/way/941994901 via StreetComplete 61.1: This is a lock | |
| 2 | 2025-07-09 19:39 | commented | Kimono My House ♦20 | Ignore this, it is a bridge in front of the lock, I'll close this | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-15 12:53 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | I suspect it doesn't apply here, but there's ongoing discussion of lock gates which can be crossed by foot at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-lock-gates-that-can-be-crossed-by-foot/134349 | ||
| 4963077 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-15 11:59 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is the weight restriction sign here for HGVs only, or a "weak bridge" sign for all vehicles? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133079583 | |
| 2 | 2025-09-15 21:59 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦878 | It's an HGV sign. The tagging on the bridge is all correct. Have added a note. | ||
| 4959913 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-13 10:52 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | 24hr bus, taxi, motorcycle, cycle lane via StreetComplete_ee 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/304845.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-13 17:39 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171886715 | ||
| 4959911 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-13 10:51 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | PSV and 7.5t HGV restriction via StreetComplete_ee 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/304842.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-13 17:31 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171886389 | ||
| 4959907 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-13 10:50 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | PSV and 7.5t HGV restriction via StreetComplete_ee 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/304841.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-13 17:31 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171886389 | ||
| 4959590 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-13 07:24 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Informal dirt path via StreetComplete_ee 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/304788.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rskedgell/traces/12063648 | |
| 2 | 2025-09-13 13:04 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171874525 | ||
| 3678457 | 1 | 2023-05-07 12:52 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thames Path temporarily(?) fenced off here via StreetComplete 52.1 Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/147040.jpg | |
| 2 | 2023-05-07 21:03 | commented | bedenski | This has been fenced off for at least a year, if not two. Look at street view on google maps, then go back through the history. You'll see its been fenced off for some time. Given that, I'm certain this is a ruse by the building management to keep pedestrians off the thames path | ||
| 3 | 2023-05-09 18:45 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | I've added the fence and set part of the path to disused:* in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135908282 I've also sent an email to LB Tower Hamlets street works team about the closure, which may help if it's covered by them. Otherwise, it's unlikely to be a PRoW, but there may be a planning condition about access. | ||
| 4 | 2023-05-09 22:12 | commented | bedenski | I guess the concern there is then there is no expectation that the path can/should be used? A non profit that tackles these issues is https://reclaimourriver.com/about-us/ but I don't think they've picked up on this section yet. | ||
| 5 | 2024-08-18 10:27 | commented | Andy__ ♦26 | Appears to still be fenced off. Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/233371.jpg | ||
| 6 | 2025-09-07 18:38 | closed | Ratatapa | |||
| 7 | 2025-09-07 18:38 | reopened | Ratatapa | |||
| 8 | 2025-09-07 18:38 | closed | Ratatapa | O342 | ||
| 9 | 2025-09-07 18:40 | reopened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | |||
| 10 | 2025-09-07 18:44 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Hi @Ratatapa and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Notes in OSM are used for communication with other mappers. Closing notes without explanation, or adding cryptic comments, isn't entirely helpful here. If you could explain what you're trying to do here, hopefully someone will be able to help you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes | ||
| 3329322 | 1 | 2022-08-24 11:22 | opened | --- | Komoot thinks this is cyclable, which it isn’t. Can this be added? (Blackwall tunnel too?). Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2022-08-25 14:01 | closed | harg ♦3,494 | According to https://www.reddit.com/r/londoncycling/comments/84bj8g/why_nobody_cycles_through_the_rotherhithe_tunnel/ it's not good for cycling but not actually illegal. I note it's currently tagged foot=discouraged and will try adding the same for bicycle, but its not an official tag and I can't promise routers will understand it. | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-17 22:22 | reopened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | |||
| 4 | 2025-07-17 22:27 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | It's been set more recently to bicycle=permissive, which is clearly wrong. It's not a revocable permission, but a right which would require a traffic order to extinguish. I'm not a huge fan of using discouraged when there's no sign, but I think it's probably the best option currently available. | ||
| 5 | 2025-09-05 19:54 | closed | 4004 ♦3,442 | retagged to discouraged for foot and bicycle. no idea where the horse access tags are from | ||
| 6 | 2025-09-07 12:24 | reopened | Ratatapa | |||
| 7 | 2025-09-07 13:06 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks @4004. It's a pity we don't have an air quality tag analogous to smoothness=horrible which routers could use to assign an appropriately high cost to the tunnel. | ||
| 8 | 2025-09-07 13:13 | commented | harg ♦3,494 | Maybe suggest a new one: access=suicide :( | ||
| 9 | 2025-09-07 13:20 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | It's not quite that bad, but I have walked through it once (and only once!) and emerged in Rotherhithe thoroughly kippered :-) | ||
| 10 | 2025-09-07 21:28 | closed | 4004 ♦3,442 | I'm sure bike routers already take into account if a route is on/next to a busy road. Plus I'd imagine the air isn't as bad during quieter hours. If there was a clear hazard, that could've been mapped. Closing this | ||
| 11 | 2025-09-07 22:03 | reopened | Ratatapa | |||
| 12 | 2025-09-07 22:18 | closed | 4004 ♦3,442 | |||
| 4948700 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-06 07:10 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "What’s the height of the curbs at this crossing?" – Unmarked Crossing – https://osm.org/node/12990070320 via StreetComplete_ee 61.1: Lowered kerb only on one side Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/303403.jpg | |
| 4947297 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-05 07:27 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is this still a pelican crossing, or have the traffic signals been removed? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1337371015 | |
| 4945120 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-03 16:12 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Proposed new taxi rank for two vehicles outside Nos. 9-11 Freemasons Road. https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4956506 | |
| 4943068 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-02 11:28 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | If this is (still?) a zebra crossing rather than a parallel crossing, it should be bicycle=dismount rather than bicycle=yes. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/29992031 | |
| 4943064 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-02 11:24 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Does the 5mph limit on the Hookers Road entrance sign apply to the (now) residential street, or just to service roads which are part of the Blackhorse Lane industrial area? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353250896 | |
| 4935668 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-08-29 10:43 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is this a toucan crossing (shared bicycle and pedestrian) or pelican/puffin (pedestrian only)? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/613176480 | |
| 2 | 2025-09-01 08:48 | commented | spiregrain ♦2,309 | poles have got the green man/red man on the opposite side, and green/amber/red bike lights on the near side. Does that make it a toucan? | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-01 11:05 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | If there's also a stop line for cyclists, then I don't think it's a toucan. I don't think it's a pelican crossing either, so maybe we could delete the crossing_ref for now, as the other tags should be enough for most data consumers. It might be a sparrow crossing, although there's not a lot of information on them, e.g. https://www.activetravelengland.gov.uk/planning-active-places/crossings | ||
| 4 | 2025-11-01 10:54 | commented | spiregrain ♦2,309 | Here's the deets Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/313998.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/313999.jpg | ||
| 4857687 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-07-16 06:29 | opened | Ju5hin ♦6 | "Paget House" OSM snapshot date: 2025-06-08T00:18:23Z POI has no name POI types: building #organicmaps android | |
| 2 | 2025-08-29 10:51 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Already added, by you: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1412246549/history | ||
| 4656072 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-08 15:24 | opened | --- | Fixed speed camera location, missing from Google maps | |
| 2 | 2025-08-29 10:44 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | This isn't Google Maps. | ||
| 4935565 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-08-29 09:32 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is this a toucan crossing (combined cycle and pedestrian), or a pelican/puffin crossing (pedestrian only)? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8942676325 | |
| 4933739 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-08-28 06:09 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a bridge, ford, or other river crossing here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9764800532 | |
| 4933036 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-08-27 15:39 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What is the height restriction here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4186226691 | |
| 4353437 | 1 | 2024-07-27 09:27 | opened | --- | Intersectional Mapping, workshop and summer programme 2024 | |
| 2 | 2025-08-27 11:06 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | There's nothing to map here, so I'm closing this note. | ||
| 4373506 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-08-08 19:50 | opened | okwithmydecay ♦1,379 | Unable to answer "Are there traffic signals that show when to cross here?" – Crossing – https://osm.org/node/9623985946 via StreetComplete 58.2: Doesn't look like a crossing, kerb lowered only one side Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/230883.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-27 08:07 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | This was an unattached crossing node from the botched TfLCID import. Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171066008 | ||
| 1399921 | 1 | 2018-05-20 11:21 | opened | Russ ♦57 | Survey required to determine the extent of Thames Path diversion due to the Tideway Tunnel works here. See notes on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58935222 | |
| 2 | 2024-04-08 18:12 | closed | n4gxg22psz | 위험: 이 게시물은 심각한 오류로 인해 해결된 것으로 표시되었습니다. | ||
| 3 | 2024-04-08 20:14 | reopened | Russ ♦57 | |||
| 4 | 2025-08-24 18:39 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | The riverside path is now open between William Henry Walk and Kirtling Street, but I didn't see any Thames Path signage to indicate that the official route has been reinstated. | ||
| 4920305 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-20 15:18 | opened | Harry Wood ♦640 | I saw this on twitter: https://x.com/MayorofLondon/status/1958165161296212377 "new public space reconnects the Thames Path" but I'm not exactly sure where it is. Is it here? In which case currently the map needs updating. | |
| 2 | 2025-08-24 18:32 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Checked and added 2025-08-24 | ||
| 4927086 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-24 11:27 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Middle Wharf to Heathwall Quay via StreetComplete_ee 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/300584.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rskedgell/traces/12046610 | |
| 2 | 2025-08-24 18:29 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added | ||
| 4407506 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-08-28 16:42 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Pelican crossing over Pump House Lane, tactile paving, island, lowered kerbs, ASL via StreetComplete_ee 58.22 Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/236397.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-24 11:53 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Note in wring place, closing. | ||
| 4927158 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-24 11:50 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Crossing island removed - is this temporary or permanent? #surveyme via StreetComplete_ee 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/300607.jpg | |
| 4927010 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-24 10:59 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Steps 6 + 8, paving stones, tactile paving via StreetComplete_ee 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/300571.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rskedgell/traces/12046593 | |
| 4926991 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-24 10:58 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Ramp via StreetComplete_ee 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/300567.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rskedgell/traces/12046592 | |
| 4926986 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-24 10:56 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Entrance to Rocket Padel (only) via StreetComplete_ee 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/300565.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/300566.jpg | |
| 4923318 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-22 10:45 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | This crossing is tagged as a toucan crossing, but has no cycle connections on either side. Is it actually a puffin crossing, or are there signed onward cycle connections? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/308858821 | |
| 2 | 2026-01-08 13:07 | closed | TomJeffs ♦193 | Footway is shared either side and the crossing is also for walking and cycling, it appears to be designed to allow cyclists to change direction using the crossing. | ||
| 4919651 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-20 08:40 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there really a swimming pool under Oxford Road and the Geoffrey Manton Building? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1390031093 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-12 13:45 | commented | trigpoint ♦6,788 | Absolutely no sign of one | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-12 13:51 | commented | trigpoint ♦6,788 | There will be one in the Aquatic Centre but doubt it's under the road | ||
| 4 | 2025-12-12 15:14 | closed | SuddenStop ♦355 | |||
| 5 | 2025-12-12 15:38 | reopened | trigpoint ♦6,788 | |||
| 6 | 2025-12-12 15:38 | commented | trigpoint ♦6,788 | Was resolved without comment so reopened | ||
| 4898674 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-08 10:20 | opened | Paul Scriven ♦109 | In context of overlay "Surfaces" – Pedestrian Area – https://osm.org/way/1001766119 via StreetComplete 61.1: This pedestrian area should not go up into Hope Street | |
| 2 | 2025-08-19 18:46 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Sidewalk areas shouldn't really be routeable highway=pedestrian + area=yes anyway - we have area:highway=footway to represent the 2D geometry surrounding linear highway=footway objects. | ||
| 2920405 | 1 | 2021-11-02 22:02 | opened | TomJeffs ♦193 | Needs pedestrian streets, or areas, adding here. | |
| 2 | 2025-08-19 14:02 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | These appear to have been added in 2022. | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-23 21:40 | closed | jamesbelchamber ♦129 | They are accurate :) | ||
| 4353641 | 1 | 2024-07-27 12:06 | opened | --- | Cruz 101 | |
| 2 | 2025-08-19 08:46 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5832926287 | ||
| 4907863 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-13 12:15 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What are the actual signed access restrictions on the service roads around the taxi rank? | |
| 4618608 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-07 19:04 | opened | Peter Newman ♦2,819 | Paths link here via StreetComplete 60.1 | |
| 2 | 2025-08-11 14:18 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | I've added a footway=link in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170296359 | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-23 16:42 | closed | Peter Newman ♦2,819 | Looks good thanks. | ||
| 3145253 | 1 | 2022-04-20 20:55 | opened | --- | The Hale Clinic, 4 Harley Street, London W1G 9PB | |
| 2 | 2024-01-09 10:05 | commented | scott234527 | HAIR TRANSPLANT TURKEY DISCOVER WHAT YOU CAN ACHIEVE WITH OUR PACKAGES OF HAIR TRANSPLANTS IN TURKEY. https://www.capitalhairrestoration.co.uk/treatments/hair-transplant-turkey-istanbul/ | ||
| 3 | 2024-10-20 17:01 | commented | harg ♦3,494 | Signage confirms. | ||
| 4 | 2025-08-11 14:13 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added 2025-02-14 as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12272937745 | ||
| 4786428 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-06-02 07:36 | opened | Traveling Mick | "Hubert Le Sueur sculpteur français, Patronne Henrietta Valois " OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: Charles I POI types: building tourism-artwork-statue historic-memorial-statue #organicmaps ios | Hubert Le Sueur French sculptor, patron Henrietta of Valois |
| 2 | 2025-08-10 19:10 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | The artist is already tagged on this object, is there anything which you feel is still missing? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12877095809 | ||
| 3 | 2025-08-27 15:16 | closed | RedAuburn ♦5,774 | closing as already tagged | ||
| 3534523 | 1 | 2023-01-27 16:05 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "Do these traffic lights have a button to request a walk signal?" for https://osm.org/node/1263640525 via StreetComplete 50.2: Staggered crossing with island on both sides of junction, split and map as separate | |
| 2 | 2025-08-10 13:05 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170244637 | ||
| 4902091 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-10 10:16 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | There's a "pedestrians prohibited" sign (TSRGD diagram 625.1) here in Bing street side imagery, but does it apply to the cycle track W of here, or the near side of Westbourne Terrace on the bridge over the railway? | |
| 4898220 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-08 05:23 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Does this road really have a 2m max width restriction? Is it signed? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4549504 | |
| 4896584 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-07 09:34 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a crossing on Great Titchfield Street immediately to the South of its junction with Margaret Street, or has this been replaced by a zebra crossing further from the junction? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12382831046 | |
| 2 | 2025-12-23 22:05 | commented | Peter Newman ♦2,819 | It's about 3m from the junction the zebra. Fence to east stopping original crossing | ||
| 3 | 2025-12-24 02:15 | commented | harg ♦3,494 | Zebra is mapped as way 1343543989 so presumably way 1420695553 and its continuations should be removed and the fence added. | ||
| 4350388 | 1 | 2024-07-25 12:45 | opened | JayTurnr ♦1,062 | Should City Road (westbound) here be access=no or something like vehicle=no? | |
| 2 | 2024-07-25 12:50 | commented | JayTurnr ♦1,062 | On Bing Streetside, it indicates this is resticted by a No Entry sign (red circle, one line). The gov website states this actually means "No entry for vehicular traffic" - so I want to side on vehicle=no instead https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/know-your-traffic-signs/regulatory-signs | ||
| 3 | 2025-08-05 11:54 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Definitely vehicle=no + bus=yes + bicycle=yes. Historically, access=no was misused because OSM Carto didn't render restricted access on roads when the tag was motor_vehicle=* or vehicle=*. That has now changed. | ||
| 4891660 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-04 10:58 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Has this crossing been upgraded to a toucan crossing - if it's still a pelican, then it should be bicycle=dismount https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2140465345 | |
| 4886988 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-01 14:09 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is this a toucan crossing (cycle and pedestrian crossing indicators) or a puffin crossing (pedestrian only)? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3832396645 | |
| 4885493 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-31 14:25 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Are the crossings at the N end of Merrielands Crescent toucan crossings, with both pedestrian and cycling crossing indicators? | |
| 445772 | 1 | 2015-10-04 12:30 | opened | Gregory Williams ♦1,263 | Is this NE corner really part of Central Middlesex Hospital? | |
| 2 | 2025-07-30 15:36 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Almost certainly not - probably mixed residential and industrial/commercial. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24648544 | ||
| 4883816 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-30 14:06 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Are there any signs indicating a weight restriction on the bridge where Cambridge Heath Road crosses the Regent's Canal? This may be a weak bridge sign (maxweighrating) or goods vehicle (maxweightrating:hgv). https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4984515 | |
| 4883763 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-30 13:44 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is Hannaford Walk actually signed as a "Home Zone", or is it just a street within a private residential development? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313596280 | |
| 2 | 2025-09-18 22:53 | closed | KX675 ♦8 | No it is not. Reclassified from living_street to residential. | ||
| 4755430 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-12 15:34 | opened | --- | ARTE FLOORS | |
| 2 | 2025-07-29 10:44 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197691960 | ||
| 4881416 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-29 09:25 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What is the name of this road? It is in OS Open Roads as Essex Road, but has a different Designated Street Name USRN. The crescent is also Grade II Listed as Annette Crescent. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23359571 https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1025278 | |
| 4874755 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-25 16:34 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Are there any signs to indicate an HGV weight restriction or 20 mph zone on Bentley Road at its junction with Kingsland Road? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1410891868 | |
| 4871944 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-23 21:00 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | There is currently a maxweight=10 tag on Hambridge Road, which is likely to be incorrect. Is there a signed weight limit on the bridge (should be tagged with maxweightrating=*), or an HGV weight limit (maxweightrating:hgv=*) elsewhere? If so, this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164209294 | |
| 4871134 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-23 11:36 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What is the maximum height on Brick Lane under the Windrush Line railway bridge? #surveyme | |
| 4870957 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-23 08:42 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is this gate locked, or is there (permissive) pedestrian access between Sampson Street and Lilley Close? | |
| 4867855 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-21 11:55 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a signed weight (maxweightrating) restriction on the bridge where North Access Road crosses Dagenham Brook? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847782021 | |
| 2414673 | 1 | 2020-11-08 10:59 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is the short section ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/862120493 ) between Rolls Passage and Fetter Lane called Fetter Lane or New Fetter Lane? The USRN Desgnated Street Name records suggest the latter. | |
| 2 | 2023-07-17 13:33 | commented | jimbofreedman | No signage either way | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-14 14:44 | commented | Harry Wood ♦640 | The way it is currently mapped appeals to my sense of logic, since it means we can follow the full length of Fetter Lane strictly sticking to ways named "Fetter Lane" (as it diverts onto that smaller side-road to the north) But then again it wouldn't be at all shocking to find naming that is _not_ pleasingly logical! I just walked along there and couldn't see any signs to clarify the name of this particular bit (which isn't really a surprise). | ||
| 4 | 2025-07-15 08:38 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks for checking. I think in the absence of any ground truth, I'll close this note and change the fixme on the way to a reworded note. Does that sound reasonable to you? | ||
| 5 | 2025-07-15 09:03 | commented | Harry Wood ♦640 | Sounds reasonable to me, yes. | ||
| 6 | 2025-07-15 15:32 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168971766 | ||
| 4845037 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-08 16:20 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Recycling container - plastic bottles via StreetComplete_ee 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/289389.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-07-08 22:57 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168670798 | ||
| 4784553 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-01 05:02 | opened | spiregrain ♦2,309 | This footpath reported open | |
| 2 | 2025-06-30 15:50 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | A friend posted some photos on social media today, so the bit in front of SIS is definitely open. I'm not sure about the section in front of Camelford House. | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-08 22:50 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Confirmed, updated and Mapillary images uploaded. | ||
| 4845033 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-08 16:15 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Asphalt ramp up to SOE memorial not mapped. via StreetComplete_ee 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/289387.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/289388.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-07-08 22:49 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168670692 | ||
| 4331143 | 1 | 2024-07-13 10:55 | opened | dbd9 | Unable to answer "Is smoking allowed here?" – 2 Love (Cafe) – https://osm.org/way/310510065 via StreetComplete 58.2: I don't see any sign prohibiting it | |
| 2 | 2024-08-16 11:20 | commented | Peter Newman ♦2,819 | It won't be allowed inside | ||
| 3 | 2024-08-16 11:39 | commented | Peter Newman ♦2,819 | But I see there is no inside | ||
| 4 | 2025-07-08 16:13 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | The seating is on the "public" riverside path, so although they don't provide ashtrays, smoking is allowed (the café has no discretion in this matter). Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/289385.jpg | ||
| 5 | 2025-07-08 22:47 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168670666 | ||
| 4478870 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-10-14 15:53 | opened | --- | Is this all Effra Quay https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/630925340 Is it fully open to the public? https://x.com/BBCTomEdwards/status/1845785237348929617 | |
| 2 | 2025-07-08 16:35 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Yes and yes. Access etc updated via SCEE 2025-07-08. | ||
| 4727222 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-25 11:04 | opened | RedAuburn ♦5,774 | does this pavement connect here? | |
| 2 | 2025-07-08 16:07 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | No, there's a retaining wall (hospital grounds on higher side) separating it from Queen's Walk. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/289384.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-08-28 09:55 | commented | RedAuburn ♦5,774 | thanks for the photo, it looks like this is taken from albert embankment, but i meant the footpath behind/above the embankment and the bridge footpath next to the north wing | ||
| 4819381 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-23 12:01 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "Is this barrier (usually) locked?" – Gate – https://osm.org/node/9485012340 via StreetComplete_ee 61.0: Vehicle gate locked, no gate for pedestrians Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/286338.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-24 07:49 | closed | harg ♦3,494 | Added locked=yes and removed access=private from road outside the gate | ||
| 4787991 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-03 08:13 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a bridge where Dark Lane crosses Norman's Brook, or does the brook pass through a culvert? If there is a bridge, is there a signed weight limit? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30624377 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70185960 | |
| 3520509 | 1 | 2023-01-16 12:51 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Are there pedestrian crossings here (or at least lowered kerbs on either side of roads))? The unconnected sidewalks are less than optimal for pedestrian routing. #surveyme | |
| 2 | 2025-06-01 08:39 | commented | Borbus ♦311 | I think this might have been changed now? Can't see any unconnected footways. | ||
| 3 | 2025-06-02 08:18 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks for spotting that, the note should have been closed. | ||
| 4780835 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-29 15:05 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unmapped grass path(s) - trace is for path in the centre of the photo via StreetComplete_ee 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281117.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rskedgell/traces/11990680 | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 19:31 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166939873 | ||
| 4780840 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-29 15:08 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unmapped dirt/grass path via StreetComplete_ee 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281118.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rskedgell/traces/11990682 | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 19:31 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166939873 | ||
| 4780926 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-29 16:01 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | New steps up from towpath to outdoor seating area via StreetComplete_ee 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281144.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-11-14 17:13 | commented | spiregrain ♦2,309 | Image seems to have expired | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-14 18:05 | commented | spiregrain ♦2,309 | 5 steps, concrete, no handrail. Steps about 2/3rds the length of the embankment width | ||
| 4 | 2025-11-14 21:38 | closed | spiregrain ♦2,309 | |||
| 4780807 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-29 14:50 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | School street entry point via StreetComplete_ee 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281110.jpg | |
| 4780805 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-29 14:49 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | School street entry point via StreetComplete_ee 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281109.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 00:09 | commented | Fahmid5987 ♦48 | Letting you (and future viewers) know that the photo in this and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4780807 now 404, and are not viewable. | ||
| 4367980 | 1 | 2024-08-05 10:35 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a path or track between the service road from Radwell to Radwell FP5 here? USRN data (numbered street and officially descrived street) suggests that there should be. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-25 13:02 | commented | Raretrack ♦17 | Having walked that path (though not since 2020), I don't believe so. There is a private property about where the note node is, preventing public access between the two points you mention. May have changed since 2020, of course. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-25 17:13 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks for checking. Sometimes you find "streets" in Open USRN which were planned, but never developed, or which no longer exist. | ||
| 4745445 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-06 15:00 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | The Colchester Road/Gooshays Drive/Gubbins Lane junction needs remodeling as there are physically separated turn lanes. | |
| 3534508 | 1 | 2023-01-27 15:46 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Split to dual carriageway E of here (2 lanes each way) via StreetComplete 50.2 Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/129888.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-05 13:00 | commented | Peter Newman ♦2,819 | Agreed | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-05 14:59 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165850573 Thanks for the nudge. | ||
| 2077953 | 1 | 2020-02-03 11:30 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | New traffic rrestriction in force from 2020-02-03 to prohibit northbound vehicles, except pedal cycles using the segregated two-way cycle track, from entering into or proceeding in that part of Sumner Road which is north of its junction with Commercial Way. https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3482025 | |
| 2 | 2025-04-28 13:41 | closed | racbent | |||
| 3 | 2025-04-29 11:51 | reopened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | |||
| 4 | 2025-04-29 11:53 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Please don't close notes without explanation. | ||
| 4723336 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-22 22:33 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | The Barts Hospital site may need to be split between the NHS and Nuffield Health parts. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170732745 | |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 16:21 | closed | spiregrain ♦2,309 | done, on the basis of puff piece on architect's website and memory of a recent visit | ||
| 4723299 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-22 21:14 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What (if any) is the upright sign restricting access to the bus "lane" here? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29504721 | |
| 4663762 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-14 08:47 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a 20 mph zone entry sign on North Park Drive? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92210713 | |
| 2 | 2025-04-20 13:07 | commented | 0235 ♦737 | Yes Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/272599.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-21 05:47 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks! Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165220609 | ||
| 4663758 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-14 08:44 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Byron Road has 20 mph road markings, but is there a 20 mph zone entry sign? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92216925 | |
| 2 | 2025-04-20 13:07 | commented | 0235 ♦737 | Yes Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/272600.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-21 05:46 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks! Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165220609 | ||
| 4663760 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-14 08:46 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a 20 mph zone entry sign on Scott Road? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92216969 | |
| 2 | 2025-04-20 13:07 | commented | 0235 ♦737 | Yes Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/272601.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-21 05:46 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks! Updatedin https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165220609 | ||
| 4663679 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-14 07:07 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Have the crossings here been upgraded from pelican (pedestrian only) to toucan (shared cycle and pedestrian)? #surveyme | |
| 2 | 2025-04-19 15:12 | commented | 0235 ♦737 | Yes, This crossing from North West to North East are all 3 Toucan crossings. However, the Crossing from North East to South East, crossing Barton Road, remains a Pelican crossing. I am not sure what tags to apply, hence the note. | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-21 05:25 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks - updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165220094 | ||
| 4719711 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-20 23:36 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What are the signed access restrictions here? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1379205113 | |
| 2 | 2025-08-14 18:31 | closed | Gordo4444 ♦73 | Visited 14 August 2025. There are three signs in this area. The first at the intersection with Bollingbroke way advises that there is no access to Stockley Business Park here for cars and motorbikes and gives directions to where access can be achieved. The larger sign near to the barriers state that the road entrance is for buses only and there is strictly no public vehicular access. The smaller sign states that there is no motorcycle access and that bicyclists should dismount and use the footpath. | ||
| 3704490 | 1 | 2023-05-24 19:55 | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,966 | This store isn't on the Coral website. Is it closed? Has something else opened? | |
| 2 | 2025-03-01 18:06 | commented | Peter Newman ♦2,819 | Agreed. Gone | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-20 11:50 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Now Londis, updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163097675 | ||
| 1910144 | 1 | 2019-09-02 08:51 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Zabrano Bar & Restaurant (n666364294) does not appear to have an FHRS ID, is it still open? | |
| 2 | 2023-10-18 15:10 | commented | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,966 | Is this Thamesbreeze Bar and Restaurant? | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-17 02:13 | commented | vjekoslav95 ♦5 | Yes, it's Thamesbreeze. Changed about 5 years ago. | ||
| 4 | 2025-04-17 10:02 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks - updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165063558 | ||
| 1910153 | 1 | 2019-09-02 08:53 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Poppies Cafe (n666364816) does not appear to have an FHRS ID, is it still open? | |
| 2 | 2023-10-18 15:08 | commented | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,966 | Is this Break and Brunch? | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-17 02:11 | commented | vjekoslav95 ♦5 | Yep, it's Break and Brunch. | ||
| 4 | 2025-04-17 09:56 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks - address added from FHRS in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165063332 | ||
| 4710162 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-14 11:16 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What are the signed access restrictions to enter this road from Wilton Road? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107158458 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-25 09:28 | commented | harg ♦3,494 | No signage at the actual junction. Outside the main entrance to Victoria Palace Theatre there's an No Left Turn sign with no stated exemptions which is a bit weird because the one way combinations imply nobody at all can use the slip road. | ||
| 4709264 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-13 17:28 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What is the current road sign and exception plate for vehicles entering Shorter Street? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1951242852 | |
| 2 | 2025-12-02 17:22 | commented | bluestarfish ♦9 | The road sign is the round blue route for buses, pedal cycles, solo motorcycles and taxis only. There are no time exceptions. | ||
| 4469273 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-10-07 23:15 | opened | RedAuburn ♦5,774 | pret and greggs shop areas not yet included in the level mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/567081599 | |
| 2 | 2025-04-11 11:10 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | They had level=-4 added already, which I thought was TfL/LU's usual "let's confuse the public by exposing engineering level numbers in lifts" thing, but the lift has -1 for the ticket hall. I've changed it to match, added layer=-1 and level:ref=-1. | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-11 15:41 | closed | RedAuburn ♦5,774 | ah nice, thanks 👍️ | ||
| 4607601 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-30 12:46 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,263 | There's a gap here that suggests that it it is impossible to get from the pavement of King Street to Delce Road, and also a gap in the walking route https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8864#map=20/51.3839193/0.5077964&layers=H . I'm guessing that in reality this isn't blocked, even if there is a kerb in the way? | |
| 2 | 2025-04-08 13:50 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | It looks like @Mex fixed this by adding crossings in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161941328 | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-08 20:48 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,263 | Yes - thanks! | ||
| 4643776 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-27 09:51 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What sort of highway is Strand Lane and how should access and ownership be tagged here? From Temple Place, Bing street side imagery suggests an unclassified/service road rather than a pedestrian street - does it change further up? Also, the passage connecting Strand Lane with Surrey Street (USRN 8402008) seems to be missing from the map. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128805224 #surveyme | |
| 2 | 2025-04-07 19:12 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649501 | ||
| 4690142 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-31 11:41 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Proposed zebra crossing here #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12715805152 | |
| 4690137 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-31 11:37 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Proposed zebra crossing on "Banstead Road located south of its junction with Hill Road" #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5198683385 https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4850149 | |
| 2 | 2025-03-31 11:37 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Wrong position, closing. | ||
| 4688591 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-30 11:11 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is this a pelican or puffin crossing (pedestrian only), or is it now a toucan crossing (pedestrians and cyclists)? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/35349190 | |
| 4684400 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-27 10:14 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | The junction of Broadway and Albion Road does not appear to be a roundabout or mini roundabout. See comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108389391 #surveyme | |
| 2 | 2025-03-28 08:11 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164195817 | ||
| 4331177 | 1 | 2024-07-13 11:14 | opened | dbd9 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Foot Path – https://osm.org/way/679070804 via StreetComplete 58.2: Left side is stones, right side is concrete blocks. Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/224032.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-25 14:01 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Tagged as surface=paving_stones | ||
| 4680649 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-24 19:43 | opened | jimblackler ♦0 | Contrary to the map as it appears now, buses and taxis are permitted to turn right here from Westminster Bridge Road (Westbound) onto York Road. | |
| 2 | 2025-03-25 14:01 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164078658 | ||
| 4599529 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-01-24 00:38 | opened | CartogNog ♦1 | "Adding opening hours as of 23/01/2025" OSM snapshot date: 2024-11-22T15:57:19Z POI name: M&S Simply Food POI types: wheelchair-yes cuisine-coffee_shop shop-convenience #organicmaps ios | |
| 2 | 2025-03-25 13:56 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1962296627 | ||
| 4682019 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-25 13:54 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is this a crossing? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2049192354 | |
| 2 | 2025-07-15 16:13 | commented | RedAuburn ♦5,774 | Yes tactile paving and surface paving stones, no markings | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-15 20:15 | closed | RedAuburn ♦5,774 | added | ||
| 4211592 | 1 | 2024-04-23 13:50 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there pedestrian access to the car park from The Avenue here? | |
| 2 | 2025-03-19 14:22 | closed | Dave Pratt | Yes, The Avenue is pedestrian and cycle only, and access to the car park is available. | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-24 00:04 | reopened | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | |||
| 4 | 2025-03-24 00:05 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | Hi Dave, there presently isn't any link mapped between the car park & The Avenue on OSM, can you confirm the note is on the location where a footpath connects the two? | ||
| 5 | 2025-03-25 08:15 | closed | Dave Pratt | As far as I can see, yes the link is in the right place. For further confirmation, check Google maps, satellite view. | ||
| 6 | 2025-03-25 08:17 | reopened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | |||
| 7 | 2025-03-25 08:19 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | We can't use Google Maps for anything related to OpenStreetMap - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google | ||
| 8 | 2025-03-25 09:57 | closed | Dave Pratt | I know that, I was just using Google maps as an example. I personally do not know how to alter the map to show the link path. Was leaving to others who know how to do this | ||
| 4677788 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-23 09:46 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | In context of overlay "Places" – Coffee Brew (Cafe) – https://osm.org/node/310600268 via StreetComplete_ee 60.2: The polygon here really should be for "The Code Agency", with "Coffee Brew" and "Axe Zone" as nodes. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/266988.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-03 15:25 | closed | TheSYR ♦20 | |||
| 4606790 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-29 20:21 | opened | --- | This particular building “The Old Bank” is a HMO (house of multiple occupancy) so, what would be the best category for this building, or tags even? | |
| 2 | 2025-02-13 11:49 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Probably building=apartments or building=residential | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-18 18:56 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | Already tagged as such, although the edit was made around the same time as the anon note. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293729168/history Not sure if HMOs are something that are obvious from a survey so maybe no point adding further tags? | ||
| 4 | 2025-03-18 19:30 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Probably not, although a street survey might be able to add building:flats=* and addr:flats=* | ||
| 4664737 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-15 05:23 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | How does the subway connect to the footway/sidewalk on the east side of Dock Road? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18657868 | |
| 4339348 | 1 | 2024-07-18 21:20 | opened | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | does Albion Channel flow away/from the Thames? Would it be correct to extend it, or a separate unnamed stream way to the thames? | |
| 2 | 2024-09-13 13:57 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | It's an ornamental canal following the former edge of the dock. Usually it doesn't flow, but if enough water entered from Canada Water, it would carry it away to the North, into Surrey Water and ultimately the Thames. | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-13 23:14 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | Firstly, I think the waterflow direction is incorrect per your reply and the now closed https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4339350 Will have to think about how to map the overflow at the dam damming Surrey Water in order to avoid any future confusion about how the water flows here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141394271 | ||
| 4 | 2025-03-14 10:22 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | I've reversed the flow direction in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163603736 There's a concrete barrier in Albion Channel very close to its Canada Water end, which should probably be tagged as waterway=weir. I can't remember which side of the footbridge it's on. | ||
| 4663768 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-14 08:51 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a 20 mph zone entry sign on Laurel Road? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92213071 | |
| 2 | 2025-05-18 15:22 | commented | 0235 ♦737 | Yes Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278864.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-18 17:16 | closed | 0235 ♦737 | And added to the map | ||
| 4663765 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-14 08:49 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Cedar Road has 20 mph road markings, but is there a 20 mph zone entry sign here? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002242971 | |
| 2 | 2025-05-18 15:22 | commented | 0235 ♦737 | Yes Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278863.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-18 17:15 | closed | 0235 ♦737 | And added to the map | ||
| 4661693 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-12 10:44 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a (named) road or footway here? #surveyme (Designated Street Name USRN 18700125) | |
| 2 | 2025-03-12 14:48 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163531262 | ||
| 4661700 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-12 10:52 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a short (named) dead-end road or footway leading off Wadcroft here? #surveyme (Designated Street Name USRN 18701054) | |
| 2 | 2025-03-12 14:41 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163530939 Does it provide a connection between Wadcroft and Commercial Road Car Park? | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-28 21:33 | closed | 0235 ♦737 | Yes, I have added this to the map | ||
| 4661886 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-12 14:07 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Proposed new pedestrian crossing here https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4830469 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12656263002 | |
| 4661861 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-12 13:29 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | New modal filter here from 2025-03-14: THE MERTON (PRESCRIBED ROUTE) (ABBEY ROAD) EXPERIMENTAL TRAFFIC ORDER 20252. The general effect of the Orders will be to introduce a point closure in: [...] (a) Abbey Road, at the location of the existing width restriction, and prohibit motor vehicles, except emergency vehicles, from entering that length of Abbey Road which lies between the northern kerb-line of Station Road and a point 2 metres north of the said kerb-line; https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4830476 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/32569879 | |
| 4661858 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-12 13:26 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | New modal filter here(?) from 2025-03-14: THE MERTON (PRESCRIBED ROUTE) (PINCOTT ROAD) EXPERIMENTAL TRAFFIC ORDER 2025 2. The general effect of the Orders will be to introduce a point closure in: [...] (b) Pincott Road, at the location of the existing width restriction, and prohibit vehicles, except emergency vehicles, from entering that length of Pincott Road which lies between a point 1 metre south of the common boundary of Nos. 58 and 60 Pincott Road and a point 1 metre north of the said common boundary. https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4830476 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3625957409 | |
| 2 | 2025-04-03 08:26 | closed | MatthewM ♦15 | Yes | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-03 08:28 | reopened | MatthewM ♦15 | |||
| 4661701 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-12 10:52 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a (named) road or footpath between Heritage Court and George Street here? #surveyme (Designated Street Name USRN 18750135) | |
| 2 | 2025-10-06 12:13 | commented | 0235 ♦737 | Yes! I have a GPS traces, and will add this soon | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-06 12:28 | closed | 0235 ♦737 | footway added | ||
| 4661672 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-12 10:27 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a passage between Newlands Street and Saint Andrews Street here? #surveyme (Designated Street Name USRN 18700890) | |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 13:17 | commented | 0235 ♦737 | Yes, there is a passage between Kala supermarket and the abandoned ARGOS to the south. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-31 15:29 | closed | 0235 ♦737 | added footpath | ||
| 4297495 | 1 | 2024-06-18 17:39 | opened | --- | Most vehicles using GPS devices are routed incorrectly to Hanwood park via Ridgway Road NN155AH. This is a dead end with no option other than to reverse 100 yards. Can this be corrected please. | |
| 2 | 2024-09-25 09:10 | commented | eteb3 ♦1,015 | Can you give more details? From where are they routed down Ridgway Road? In the database Ridgeway Road is open to access for all motor vehicles from Poplar's Farm Rd northwards for around 500m, to where it ends and gives onto a footpath. I've tried a few routes that might make use of Ridgeway Rd and all avoid it due to the footpath. Sometimes routing engines misinterpret tags on roads - do you know which apps or satnavs are throwing up this issue? If you can give more details of the error, someone can try to repeat it and fix it. | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-10 20:40 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | @eteb3 As you're unlikely to get a response from the note's author, is this OK to close? | ||
| 4 | 2025-03-10 21:14 | closed | eteb3 ♦1,015 | Yeah. Think so | ||
| 4656347 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-08 18:11 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Stile via StreetComplete_ee 60.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/264614.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-10 20:30 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163459135 | ||
| 4268368 | 1 | 2024-05-28 00:10 | opened | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | This way is area is tagged as tourism="theme_park;attraction" Does tourism=theme_park accurately describe the entire site? I don't want to remove the ;attraction part if it should be tagged differently. but a theme park should definitely contain attractions, not be the attraction. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23659476 | |
| 2 | 2025-03-10 20:10 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | The tourism=theme_park;attraction tagging may have made sense in when it was added in 2008, but it doesn't now. Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163458372 | ||
| 4470110 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-10-08 15:23 | opened | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | presumably this covid related sample collection is no longer here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8715512497 | |
| 2 | 2025-03-10 20:03 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unsurprisingly not there 2025-03-09, removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163458148 | ||
| 4656344 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-08 18:07 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Path connects to car park via StreetComplete_ee 60.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/264613.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-09 07:44 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Added | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-09 07:44 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | |||
| 4526421 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-20 08:47 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Has this crossing been removed? A fixme on the node refers to planned removal in 2021. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/108235 | |
| 2 | 2025-03-07 19:45 | commented | Peter Newman ♦2,819 | Still here | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-07 22:56 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks - fixme removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163346267 | ||
| 4653404 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-06 11:09 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a new pedestrian crossing here? #surveyme | |
| 4236983 | 1 | 2024-05-09 07:15 | opened | user_4942 ♦69 | this bridge seems to have been moved to completely the wrong place at one end, but I don't know where exactly it should be to put it back | |
| 2 | 2024-05-10 09:29 | commented | harg ♦3,494 | I'm puzzled, because the misplaced node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/307642733/history#map=17/51.35791/-0.26294&layers=N says it has not been edited for 15 years even though it's part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150392876#map=4/28.18/14.63 that was edited 17 days ago. I see rskedghill has made a comment on that changeset and have messaged him to see if this can be undone. | ||
| 3 | 2024-05-10 11:01 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | I've had a stab at restoring it. When @CharlieH22 dragged the end of the bridge onto the running track, merging the node deleted the newer node, n378212139. Luckily, the running track was mapped before the bridge, so I've undeleted this node. The path from the bridge was also glued to the London LOOP path, with @CharlieH22 creating n11841258383. I have deleted this node. There is probably a better way to do this using archived extracts from planet.osm or using Overpass Turbo's attic data, but hopefully I've fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151139452 When I get a chance, I'll do a run along that section of the London LOOP and check it my GNSS trace against the map. I'm injured, so this may be a few weeks. | ||
| 4 | 2025-03-03 00:02 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | what specifically needs surveying here? | ||
| 5 | 2025-03-03 15:20 | commented | user_4942 ♦69 | I think that the bridge that was restored was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245590371 but now it has been restored you can no longer tell from my note. I guess by the time rskedgell had recovered from injury, we had all forgotten. If checking this bridge is easy for you, please do, otherwise I think we can just resolve this. | ||
| 6 | 2025-03-03 15:23 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Yes, it took a while. I'll get off my backside and take a look in the nxt couple of weeks. | ||
| 4646272 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-01 10:24 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "How many car lanes does this road have?" – York Road (Minor/Unclassified Road) – https://osm.org/way/67235756 via StreetComplete_ee 60.1: Timed motor vehicle restriction Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/263233.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-05 23:47 | closed | MagicPocketbook462 ♦40 | Conditional restrictions added to road. | ||
| 4646251 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-01 10:09 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Construction site via StreetComplete_ee 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/263222.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-21 19:24 | closed | MagicPocketbook462 ♦40 | Created a node to keep track of construction site and node contains note of what it could possibly become (a Premier Inn) | ||
| 4544785 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-06 07:28 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there really a two-way residential road called "Bus Lane" here, physically segregated from Chatham Hill and with permissive access only for motor vehicles and all other modes prohibited? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317107009 (Hint: of course there isn't) | |
| 2 | 2025-02-27 20:46 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | |||
| 3664209 | 1 | 2023-04-28 13:54 | opened | paulbiv ♦6 | Unable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" for https://osm.org/node/1193541589 via StreetComplete 52.0: Construction Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/145304.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-27 20:09 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | landuse=construction added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163027241 | ||
| 4644134 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-27 14:43 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Does Church Path extend to connect with Khyber Road or Mill Road? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1329496167 | |
| 3826577 | 1 | 2023-08-10 17:05 | opened | --- | Private drive | |
| 2 | 2025-02-24 17:30 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162897821 et seq. | ||
| 4639971 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-24 12:49 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Changed vehicle restrictions around Carnoustie Drive/Freeling Street junction from 2025-03-17 #surveyme https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4819207 | |
| 3278168 | 1 | 2022-07-22 12:39 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What is the green structure here? #surveyme | |
| 2 | 2025-02-23 12:56 | commented | GeorgeHoneywood ♦418 | It's a picnic bench | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-24 08:52 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks - added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162881778 | ||
| 4529258 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-22 16:49 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What are the signed vehicle or motor vehicle restrictions as the entrance to Gardiner Street here? What are the exceptions? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-18 15:52 | commented | papaj ♦159 | No vehicle access here Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/257749.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-14 09:31 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161503303 - thanks! | ||
| 2884882 | 1 | 2021-10-07 15:02 | opened | GEOIG | Could you check this place? Our driver couldn't make right turn from King Street to the Jeffery Street. | |
| 2 | 2024-11-15 21:11 | closed | mapeing ♦379 | |||
| 3 | 2025-02-13 17:07 | reopened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | |||
| 4 | 2025-02-13 17:08 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Jeffrey Street is one way to the East of its junction with King Street | ||
| 4471397 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-10-09 13:05 | opened | DaveF ♦693 | Is this short stretch of road really named High St, Victoria St, Railway St & Balmoral Road? | |
| 2 | 2024-10-14 20:19 | closed | mapeing ♦379 | yes | ||
| 3 | 2024-10-14 20:31 | reopened | DaveF ♦693 | |||
| 4 | 2024-10-14 20:32 | commented | DaveF ♦693 | What is your source? | ||
| 5 | 2024-10-14 20:37 | commented | mapeing ♦379 | google maps, local maps, and the fact that i live here. | ||
| 6 | 2024-10-14 20:45 | commented | DaveF ♦693 | OSM contributors can't use google maps. Are the local maps out of copyright or have an OSM compatible licence? Are there road signs? Railway St is extremely short | ||
| 7 | 2024-10-14 21:25 | commented | DaveF ♦693 | This is the section that appears out of place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18677636#map=19/51.386397/0.549972 | ||
| 8 | 2025-02-13 15:39 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | @DaveF The section SE of the High Street/Railway Street/Victoria Street junction has the same Designated Street Name record in OS Open USRN as the rest of Balmoral Road, so I have updated it accordingly. I've also added bridge:name=Victoria Bridge based on old OS maps via NLS. I'll get rid of the horrible mapping for the renderer of the junction later. | ||
| 9 | 2025-02-13 16:20 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Junction fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162472833 | ||
| 4472437 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-10-10 08:43 | opened | mapeing ♦379 | Lindfield Quarter building | |
| 2 | 2024-10-10 08:44 | commented | mapeing ♦379 | Quarters* | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-13 11:56 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Resolving, as the original note's text was deleted along with the user who created the note. | ||
| 4513866 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-10 08:11 | opened | mapeing ♦379 | Former Biffa Landfill Site | |
| 2 | 2024-11-10 12:29 | commented | harg ♦3,494 | OSM generally maps what is there now, not what was there previously. Is there currently any signage to indicate a name or purpose of the site? | ||
| 3 | 2024-11-10 12:32 | commented | mapeing ♦379 | https://www.kentonline.co.uk/dartford/news/400-homes-plan-for-former-landfill-315563/ | ||
| 4 | 2025-02-13 11:55 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Resolving, as the original note's text was deleted along with the user who created the note. | ||
| 4495436 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-10-26 16:31 | opened | mapeing ♦379 | Two green electrical containers - code is EIB-C | |
| 2 | 2024-10-26 16:32 | commented | mapeing ♦379 | it is 230 volts | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-13 11:53 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Resolving, as the original note's text was deleted along with the user who created the note. | ||
| 4512644 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-09 08:25 | opened | mapeing ♦379 | NMC Accountants & Tax Advisors | |
| 2 | 2024-12-10 09:23 | commented | Mex ♦7,352 | has this replaced grays? | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-13 11:52 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Resolving, as the original note's text was deleted along with the user who created the note. | ||
| 4462581 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-10-03 09:01 | opened | mapeing ♦379 | “General mail for Balmoral Garden Healthy Living Centre” black mail box at the front entrance Followed by: “Repeat Subscription Green Practise” (green) “Repeat Subscription Yellow Practise” (yellow) “Repeat Subscription Red Practise” (red) “Repeat Subscription Blue Practise” (blue) these mailboxes are located on the building entrance | |
| 2 | 2024-10-03 09:10 | commented | mapeing ♦379 | i’ll probably do this later but if anyone else wants to do it, it’s all followed by black going first and blue being last, black on the left and blue being right | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-13 11:51 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | |||
| 4474687 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-10-11 20:23 | opened | mapeing ♦379 | majority of the high street has a “PSPO” (Public Space Protection Order) | |
| 2 | 2024-11-22 16:52 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | If the PSPO places restrictions on consuming alcohol, that could be tagged, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:alcohol | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-13 11:51 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Original note description deleted along with the user who added it. | ||
| 4600157 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-24 14:29 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,263 | How do cyclists get from the cycleway to the road here? After an edit by a now-deleted user, there is now a gap at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13512082#map=20/51.3941543/0.5625678 . | |
| 2 | 2025-02-13 11:46 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | There's a lowered kerb - see https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=51.39422%7E0.562352&lvl=19.9&mo=om.1&pi=-16.1&style=x&dir=68.3 Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162251302 | ||
| 4625756 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-13 11:43 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there any signage explicitly permitting cycling on the sidewalk of Gads Hill between Mariners View and Waterside Lane? #surveyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359578093 | |
| 4618076 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-07 10:37 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is this footpath Clarendon Grove? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330873078 Camden have made a temporary traffic order closing Clarendon Grove from 2025-02-24 to 2026-01-23, with diversions via Drummond Crescent, Eversholt Street and Phoenix Road. This currently unnamed footway seems to be the only mapped highway to which this could apply. https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4807709 #surveyme | |
| 3937914 | 1 | 2023-10-13 08:15 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Is there a gate here? | |
| 2 | 2025-02-07 09:44 | commented | Taktaal ♦4,943 | hi. notes are better used for stating facts, than asking questions. if you know whether a gate is here, you should rather write "there is a gate here" or "there is no gate here" | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-07 10:18 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Hi, thanks for your patronising non-contribution. Do please provide a link to the wiki or a community discussion which supports your assertion. | ||
| 2058500 | 1 | 2020-01-15 19:01 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Proposed School Streets (timed pedestrian and cycle zone) around Addison Road from 2020-03. | |
| 2 | 2025-02-05 14:16 | commented | Mex ♦7,352 | do you know if this ever got implemened? | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-05 15:57 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Yes, the experimental traffic order was made permanent on 2021-11-25, see https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3937423 Bing's street side imagery hasn't really caught up yet, although they managed to visit the junction of Shernhall Street and Addison Road during the school holidays. The plain grey signs just beyond the zebra crossing will show am appropriate sign during term time. https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=51.583036%7E-0.007207&lvl=21.9&mo=om.1&pi=7.8&style=x&dir=272.3 I'll try to get up there in the next few weeks and take pics of the signs while doing some StreetComplete surveying. | ||
| 4579437 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-07 10:33 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | What type of crossing is this? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6384523737 | |
| 2 | 2025-01-08 20:17 | closed | HQ- | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-08 20:17 | reopened | HQ- | |||
| 4 | 2025-02-03 12:47 | commented | trigpoint ♦6,788 | pelican or whatever foot only are now | ||
| 5 | 2025-02-03 14:55 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks - updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162090319 | ||
| 4607531 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-30 11:42 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | A proposed traffic order refers to Disraeli Walk, adjacent to Nos. 212 and 212c Upton Lane. Is there any evidence of this on the ground? #surveyme https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4800985 | |
| 2 | 2025-04-01 10:18 | closed | spiregrain ♦2,309 | It's now been physically signed as Walter Tull Way. See source:name= and note= tags on the ways for details. | ||
| 4606018 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-29 08:33 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Pedestrian Crossing – https://osm.org/way/903943939 via StreetComplete_ee 60.1: No crossing - pretend crossing way to make decorative separate sidewalks "work"? Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/258833.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-29 09:19 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Changed to link/informal in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161888795 | ||
| 4604159 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-27 17:30 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Social media posts by Tideway on 2025-01-27 suggest that the riverside path is near to reopening #surveyme | |
| 4600166 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-24 14:35 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Proposed zebra crossing - see https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4794085 | |
| 4599362 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-23 20:31 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Knights Road and Bradfield Road one way working to be reversed from 2025-01-27 https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4796058 | |
| 2 | 2025-02-14 21:25 | commented | dankarran ♦788 | Hasn't changed on the ground yet, still one-way northbound | ||
| 4599361 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-23 20:30 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Knights Road and Bradfield Road one way working to be reversed from 2025-01-27 https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4796058 | |
| 2 | 2025-02-14 21:22 | commented | dankarran ♦788 | Hasn't changed on the ground yet, still one-way southbound | ||
| 3821370 | 1 | 2023-08-07 13:41 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Unable to answer "Osmose quest: Bad tag value" for https://osm.org/node/663749774 via StreetComplete_ee 53.32: Tomb, not sure how best to tag Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/166527.jpg https://westnordost.de/p/166528.jpg | |
| 2 | 2024-04-07 22:21 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | memorial type = grave, perhaps a node=grave is better suited? | ||
| 3 | 2024-04-08 18:17 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | There's also historic=tomb, which might be a better fit for this one. I was hoping that the 2023 Q4 project would focus more on graveyards and develop a better consensus on funerary monuments, but there wasn't much interest in that area. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dtomb | ||
| 4 | 2025-01-23 07:09 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | It has a wikidata, which can be added along with a better set of tags https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q26392662 | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-23 09:04 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Thanks - wikidata and heritage tags added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161665417 | ||
| 4246911 | 1 | 2024-05-15 07:31 | opened | rskedgell ♦2,441 | Weight restriction signage will be updated when signage for new/proposed 20mph limits is installed. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-14 19:08 | commented | spiregrain ♦2,309 | Still marked with 16.5t in a red circle today. | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-15 09:03 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,441 | I'll see if I can find someone at Newham who can fix this (and the obsolete 20mph zone exit to 30mph signs left within phases 1 and 2 of he borough-wide 20mph scheme). James Asser was dealing with it, but was replaced by Cllr John Morris after he became an MP at the general election. | ||
| 4 | 2025-01-15 09:34 | commented | spiregrain ♦2,309 | The Love Newham website might help (a sort of homegrown FixMyStreet); I'm a LBN resident, so there is another reporting tool open to me. I've managed to get streetsign typos fixed with it. But if you have direct contacts open to you, that would probably be better! |