| Note | # | Tmstmp UTC | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4423293 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-09-07 02:45 | opened | M GCS ♦88 | The abandoned railway mapped here could not be seen when surveying from the Mary Jemison Trail. Apparently it either no longer exists or is not mapped in the right place. |
| 2 | 2025-06-18 01:05 | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | If it no longer exists, it should be removed from the map. | |
| 3 | 2025-12-06 19:50 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | It's the right place. You can see that on the aerials to the northeast and southwest. It's possible that a short section has been razed, in which case, it should be tagged railway=razed. Contrary to what CM13 says, it shouldn't be deleted. | |
| 4 | 2025-12-06 22:03 | reopened | M GCS ♦88 | The abandoned railway is mapped as going from northwest to southeast, so I don't see how the aerials to the northeast and southwest can help verify it. Anyway, I looked carefully when hiking around this spot and could not see it. It is mapped as crossing the trail near this point, so if it was still present in this exact location, I don't know how I could have missed it. | |
| 5 | 2025-12-07 22:00 | commented | RussNelson ♦73 | Dyslexia rears its ugly head again. Yes, northwest to southeast of this location is clearly a railbed. It stands to reason that the area in-between should be a railway=abandoned or if you must, railway=dismantled. | |
| 6 | 2026-01-19 05:29 | commented | Natfoot ♦566 | I can see it. I am looking at the USGS 3D. Any way you want to map this railway=abandoned or razed:railway=rail or other tags are good. may also want to tag it as man_mad=cutting | |
| 7 | 2026-01-19 05:32 | commented | Natfoot ♦566 | I have been tagging these as razed:railway=rail and railway=razed. makes it clear we are seeing less than rail but still a clear right of way. if the right of way is obliterated then it is time to remove. | |
| 8 | 2026-01-22 05:40 | commented | RussNelson ♦73 | I have been tagging these as railway=abandoned if there is still signs of where the railway went, whether a treeline, or an oddly shaped building, or a cutting or embankment or an obvious right-of-way. railway=razed is where you can't see that a railway used to go there. I understand that some people don't see what they don't want to see, but they should understand that other people can see these things. | |
| 5082125 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-12-07 14:31 | opened | SnapZinger ♦13 | "St. Joseph is on Madison St. St Patrick's is located on this plot." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-11-23T18:39:39Z POI name: St. Joseph POI types: building amenity-place_of_worship-christian #organicmaps android 2025.11.26-5-Google |
| 2 | 2026-01-02 03:52 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | The FUCK are you talking about?? It's the biggest RC church in Elmira and yes, it's still there. | |
| 3 | 2026-01-03 13:00 | reopened | SnapZinger ♦13 | Hey, asshole. Nice of you to be a dick to people trying to make this better. Please reference the parish website: https://www.elmiracatholic.org/about/ I wasn't saying it's not there just the name is off. | |
| 4 | 2026-01-04 04:25 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | Hey asshole, you said exactly that: "The place has gone or never existed. " Nice of you to be a dick to people trying to make this better. | |
| 5 | 2026-01-04 23:42 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,264 | ||
| 6 | 2026-01-04 23:47 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,264 | Come on - surely we can start the new year better than with a "The FUCK are you talking about" followed by 2 "hey assholes"? The "The place has gone or never existed." text was likely composed by Organic Maps and the person adding the note had no control over it. PS: There's now an extra "St Patrick's" - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357637013/history . I guess it didn't get picked up as a duplicate because the main building was misnamed until recently. Regards, Andy (acting on a report to the DWG) | |
| 7 | 2026-01-05 22:25 | reopened | RussNelson ♦73 | ||
| 8 | 2026-01-05 22:28 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | Merged the node into the building. Apologies, @snapzinger, I thought it was you saying that it didn't exist. I've never heard of Organic Maps. Sounds like my beef is with them. | |
| 5098173 Category: CoMaps | 1 | 2025-12-20 04:14 | opened | Lanmou ♦58 | "Closed in 2024" OSM snapshot date: 2025-12-09T01:54:54Z POI name: Market St. Brewing Co. POI types: amenity-bar #CoMaps ios 2025.12.11-2-ios |
| 2 | 2026-01-02 03:58 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | Yep, it's gone. | |
| 5091084 Category: CoMaps | 1 | 2025-12-14 15:14 | opened | Lanmou ♦58 | This place does not exist: "no longer exists" A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-12-09T01:54:54Z POI name: Burger King POI types: cuisine-burger amenity-fast_food #CoMaps ios 2025.12.11-2-ios |
| 2 | 2026-01-02 03:57 | commented | RussNelson ♦73 | The mall is going to be a mess for mapping every shop, because there are two floors. | |
| 5082132 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-12-07 14:34 | opened | SnapZinger ♦13 | "Long gone. Building is empty." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-11-23T18:39:39Z POI name: Big Lots POI types: shop-department_store #organicmaps android 2025.11.26-5-Google |
| 2 | 2026-01-02 03:55 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | Yes, the Big Lots has been closed for months. | |
| 5081735 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-12-07 06:04 | opened | SnapZinger ♦13 | Urgent Care #organicmaps android 2025.11.26-5-Google |
| 2 | 2026-01-02 03:51 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | Yes, this is a Wellnow, as mapped. | |
| 5082144 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-12-07 14:39 | opened | SnapZinger ♦13 | "Building is present, but non-functional. City has permanently closed the pool." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-11-23T18:39:39Z POI name: Memorial Pool POI types: sport-swimming #organicmaps android 2025.11.26-5-Google |
| 2 | 2026-01-02 03:51 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | The pool was torn down several years ago. | |
| 4952834 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-08 15:13 | opened | JessAk71 ♦1,615 | technically as far as I can tell this train station is a station in name only, no passenger service comes out of this station, its currently used for the Revolution Rail bike trail. If this is the case, tags on the station building itself and the stop location could be updated to reflect its current non-rail station use perhaps with life cycle tags. |
| 2 | 2025-09-08 15:16 | commented | JessAk71 ♦1,615 | to add to this the Saratoga and North Creek Railway which used to stop here and use the tracks here no longer operates as of 2018. So there may be other stations tagged along its route that may need this same treatment. | |
| 3 | 2025-12-06 19:19 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | One could argue whether Revolution Rail operates trains of railbikes or not. They have a bar which can be used to connect a set of railbikes together to form a train, so ...... | |
| 4 | 2025-12-06 19:19 | reopened | RussNelson ♦73 | ||
| 4891240 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-04 04:12 | opened | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | No railway found on ground here. There are buildings both sides... Appears to no longer exist. via StreetComplete 61.2 |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 19:16 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | There was never a railway here. | |
| 4891239 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-04 04:12 | opened | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | If this railway doesn't exist, it needs to be removed. OSM is only for features that currently exist! via StreetComplete 61.2 |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 19:12 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | ||
| 4891245 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-04 04:19 | opened | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | Does this bridge still exist? |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 19:11 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | The abutments are still there, so one could reasonably infer that there was an abandoned bridge. I checked my photos, and yes, in 2012 the bridge was abandoned. | |
| 2696364 | 1 | 2021-06-02 23:38 | opened | JessAk71 ♦1,615 | the canal section in this area should probably be tagged as derelict since its not in use and has no water here |
| 2 | 2023-07-11 21:57 | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | Wow, it cuts across everything. Or removed (moved to OHM) if it is only mapped for historical purposes and has been overbuilt/filled in. | |
| 3 | 2025-12-06 19:08 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | It's tagged correctly as an abandoned waterway. | |
| 4928461 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-08-25 03:00 | opened | Coco Lewie ♦91 | This red trail that's marked as a foot path is actually a snowmobile trail. It crosses private properties that the owners only allow permission to snowmobile riders. Trying to walk this trail any other time of year might get you shot at. |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 19:06 | commented | RussNelson ♦73 | https://ucsvroute.com/history/ says that's not true. | |
| 2751112 | 1 | 2021-07-11 19:51 | opened | JessAk71 ♦1,615 | canal in this section still has water in it, suggest adding water to the sections of the canal that are still open and have water in them in this area |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:56 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | I've ridden the entire length of the canalway trail multiple times. There are sections which still have water, but in general have enough fallen trees that you couldn't treat them as a waterway. | |
| 4415652 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-09-02 12:28 | opened | mmriley159 | The O'Neil Road bridge is intact but has been closed since 1993. There are barriers at both ends that block all access. |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:53 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | Gotcha. Fixed: access=no | |
| 5013399 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-19 12:36 | opened | C800jmc | 2 Flock cameras. Monitors both directions. Wyoming County Sheriff. |
| 2 | 2025-10-19 12:38 | closed | C800jmc | Two flock cameras are mounted to a telephone pole. They are the property of the Wyoming County Sheriff. | |
| 3 | 2025-10-19 12:38 | reopened | C800jmc | ||
| 4 | 2025-12-06 18:46 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | Please add them using instructions on deflock.me. | |
| 5 | 2025-12-06 18:46 | reopened | RussNelson ♦73 | ||
| 5013410 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-19 12:41 | opened | C800jmc | 2 flock cameras are mounted at this intersection by the Wyoming County Sheriff. They monitor traffic on Route 20A in both directions. |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:45 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | Add them according to directions on deflock.me please. | |
| 5012762 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-19 01:50 | opened | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | These railways should be removed if they don't exist. no crossing here either. |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:42 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | ||
| 5012763 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-19 01:51 | opened | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | No sign of canal here. Only things that currently exist should be mapped. "Historic" features belong on OHM and should be removed from OSM. |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:42 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | ||
| 4107929 | 1 | 2024-02-11 04:35 | opened | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | The railways here have long been replaced by large buildings that removed all trace. The railways need to be removed. OSM is only for features that *currently* exist. |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:42 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | ||
| 3650682 | 1 | 2023-04-19 23:20 | opened | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | No railway or remnants here going across the road on aerial imagery or Bing Streetside imagery. Should be removed. |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:40 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | ||
| 3650683 | 1 | 2023-04-19 23:21 | opened | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | There is no canal going through these houses! Should be moved to OHM if it once existed but no longer does. |
| 2 | 2023-11-02 05:35 | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | Still no canal here in the real world. All traves need to be removed from OSM to comply with the very basic rule of "only map what is on the ground", as well as "can be verified" and not mapling hostorical features that no longer exist. | |
| 3 | 2025-12-06 18:33 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | Stop deleting things that EXIST!!! This is called vandalism. Here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456535048 and here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456535047 These are sections of the original Erie Canal that STILL EXIST. Stop vandalizing the map! | |
| 4190590 | 1 | 2024-04-09 16:50 | opened | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | There is no canal here. It needs to be removed. Maybe add it to OHM if it existed. |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:28 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | Thanks for alerting me to your edit. I've added it back as a historic derelict canal. Correct tagging is better than deleting things other editors have added. | |
| 5035519 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-02 23:42 | opened | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | "railway graded but never operated" Sounds like it wasn't even built. It certainly no longer exists. Features that no longer exist (if ever) don't belong on OSM and should be removed. "Historical" features belong on OHM instead. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152275845 |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:25 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | Wrong. | |
| 5035520 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-02 23:44 | opened | CurlingMan13 ♦52,160 | "railway graded but never operated" Sounds like it wasn't even built. It certainly no longer exists. Features that no longer exist (if ever) don't belong on OSM and should be removed, especially if they have been overbuilt by new features. "Historical" features belong on OHM instead. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152275845 |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:24 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | Unlike you, I have been there, and you can see a railbed most places along the route of this railroad. Thank for your not editing abandoned railroads in NY. Go edit them somewhere else where your edits are welcome. | |
| 5059871 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-19 14:49 | opened | --- | This bike path does not exist |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:18 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | It's not a formal rail-trail, but people use it as such. I've ridden it, and it's fine. | |
| 4452789 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-09-25 21:37 | opened | ForestFurnace ♦321 | Painted Post/Riverside/Corning, NY: Does this part of the Painted Post Path/Corning Bike Path exist (the part east of the Cutler Avenue Extension/Western Lane intersection)? Part of it just looks like railroad tracks. |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:16 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | It definitely continues east past I86. People use the "Corning BIke Path" as just that. It's an informal bike path on an old railbed. No tracks present. | |
| 2181216 | 1 | 2020-05-04 16:02 | opened | JessAk71 ♦1,615 | user Milo Miller has put what looks like a lot of spam on the map, in particular in this area. I have tried to cleaned up what I can verify but others please take a look at the users changesets most are suspect and there is more to address... |
| 2 | 2020-09-15 05:10 | commented | JessAk71 ♦1,615 | anyone have thoughts on this area or other areas from this user? | |
| 3 | 2021-02-02 00:43 | commented | DUGA ♦447 | Please post user profile link here. | |
| 4 | 2021-02-02 01:22 | commented | JessAk71 ♦1,615 | thanks DUGA, here it is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Milo%20Miller | |
| 5 | 2025-02-14 07:53 | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,913 | is there any spam remaining? can you link any problematic objects? | |
| 6 | 2025-02-21 22:20 | commented | JessAk71 ♦1,615 | Looks like there still are suspicious things in the area, example: most of the streams and ponds here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68694300 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68790602 to name a few but there are more water features that are from the same user | |
| 7 | 2025-12-05 03:40 | commented | RussNelson ♦73 | I'll get up there this weekend. I agree that some of these things are suspicious, or if not suspicious, are poorly edited. | |
| 8 | 2025-12-06 18:13 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | Milo Miller lives at 2903 Merriam Road. His edits, while possibly over-enthusiastic, are based on local information, so we really can't judge. "Chives Trickle" exists, but it's really just a drain (edited). I spoke to a couple of property owners, and they were fine with not having a name on their pond. | |
| 5077798 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-12-03 19:14 | opened | --- | No railway here.... No tracks. Not sure why it is on the map. |
| 2 | 2025-12-03 19:35 | closed | ICT_maps ♦5,672 | removed | |
| 3 | 2025-12-03 19:39 | reopened | ICT_maps ♦5,672 | ||
| 4 | 2025-12-03 20:08 | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,913 | asked on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174568846 | |
| 5 | 2025-12-03 20:56 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | It's on the map because a railroad went through here. If you had ever been there, you would have seen it with your own eyes like I did. | |
| 5077802 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-12-03 19:17 | opened | --- | No railroad here. Fix your map! |
| 2 | 2025-12-03 19:37 | closed | ICT_maps ♦5,672 | removed | |
| 3 | 2025-12-03 19:39 | reopened | ICT_maps ♦5,672 | ||
| 4 | 2025-12-03 20:08 | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,913 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159287438 | |
| 5 | 2025-12-03 20:10 | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,913 | asked in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134557696 | |
| 6 | 2025-12-03 20:49 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | There was a railroad here. It has been abandoned, but rails remain in place 300' north and 100' south. | |
| 5077809 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-12-03 19:21 | opened | --- | Fix your map. There is no railroad here across the freeway! |
| 2 | 2025-12-03 20:12 | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,913 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95007998 | |
| 3 | 2025-12-03 20:25 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | It's plainly there on aerial photos. I could chop it in half at the Thruway, making it razed, but I don't see the value in doing that. It just bloats the database with something that only gets rendered if you ask for it. | |
| 4 | 2025-12-03 20:34 | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,913 | ||
| 5 | 2025-12-03 20:34 | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,913 | mapping section entirely razed and gone should not be done at all in OSM, that section should be deleted | |
| 6 | 2025-12-03 20:38 | closed | RussNelson ♦73 | No, it shouldn't be deleted, because if you see it crossing the highway as you're driving along, you are alerted to its visibility north and south of the road. Maps aren't made to be pedantic, they're made to be useful. |