%20and%20cars.%20The%20map%20should%20showcase%20an%20extensive%20network%20of%20hig.png){kind=small}
stillhart for the last 12 monthsstillhart for the last 12 months| Note | # | Tmstmp UTC | Event | Contributor | Comment | Auto-translation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4960081 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-13 12:46 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | A lot of street side parking isnhere | |
| 2 | 2025-09-13 16:47 | closed | stillhart ♦76 | |||
| 4954326 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-09 12:24 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Tiny Circle | |
| 2 | 2025-09-09 19:15 | commented | K12230LF ♦16,329 | Hello, What is it or what would you like to add on the map ? | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-12 13:54 | commented | stillhart ♦76 | There is a tiny roundabout at that point. Can't make it easy with GoMap and little time :) | ||
| 4 | 2025-09-13 08:04 | closed | polisminus ♦25 | I added a mini roundabout! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout | ||
| 4782571 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-30 20:23 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Tesla website mentions 24 superchargers, node only 20. which one is correct? https://www.tesla.com/en_eu/findus?bounds=51.87588732978558%2C0.21515881490683508%2C51.865076267335034%2C0.18082653951621008&location=birchangergreensupercharger | |
| 2 | 2025-08-16 13:02 | commented | eXeC64 ♦2 | I just counted 20 in person. | ||
| 3 | 2025-08-16 18:16 | closed | stillhart ♦76 | Thank you🙏 | ||
| 4838689 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-04 12:10 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | This supercharger has been updated with more stalls and newer chargers, but i'm not sure if all of them where. https://x.com/TeslaCharging/status/1940806029161406501 Tesla shows another point more south, is there a second stall or has it been updated? overall, this needs an update. | |
| 4817459 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-06-22 12:50 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | "Kein feldweg, befestigte zufahrtsstrsse" OSM snapshot date: 2025-05-31T01:21:10Z POI has no name POI types: psurface-paved_good hwtag-yesfoot highway-track #organicmaps ios | No dirt road, paved access roads |
| 2 | 2025-06-23 15:25 | closed | habi ♦6,490 | Von dir in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167956746 so angepasst | ||
| 3 | 2025-06-23 17:31 | reopened | stillhart ♦76 | |||
| 4 | 2025-06-23 17:32 | closed | stillhart ♦76 | Sorry und danke. Mein mobile editor und netz wollte nicht. | ||
| 4813509 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-19 21:11 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Tesla spricht hier von 39 anstatt 40 chargern. Hat sich da was vor Ort geändert? | Tesla is talking about 39 instead of 40 chargers here, has something changed on site? |
| 2 | 2025-06-21 04:33 | commented | Im Fokus ♦1,882 | 39, 40, who cares? Und welche Loser fahren noch Tesla :-) | ||
| 3 | 2025-06-21 08:08 | commented | stillhart ♦76 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Etiquette/Etiquette_Guidelines Das ist Openstreetmap. Du kannst deine anscheinend radikale Politik Zuhause lassen und vielleicht mal über dein Verhalten nachdenken. | ||
| 4 | 2025-06-21 20:34 | commented | Im Fokus ♦1,882 | Hey man, völlig spaßbefreit? Smiley-Zeichen am Ende übersehen? Aus einem Post von weniger als der Hälfte von 140 Zeichen auf "radikale Politik" schließen? Solltest Du da nicht lieber mal darüber nachdenken, wie schnell Du Menschen in eine Schublade steckst? Natürlich ist das OpenStreetMap hier und nicht das Politbüro des Zentralkomitees der PdAK in Pjöngjang. Hier darf hoffentlich auch mal geulkt werden, ohne dass man wegen Abweichung vom rechten Glauben gleich in ein Umerziehungslager geschickt wird, um "über sein Verhalten nachzudenken". Therefore: take it easy, man. All for peace & understanding. | ||
| 5 | 2025-07-03 01:31 | commented | Im Fokus ♦1,882 | Vertrau Tesla! (Natürlich nur in einem solchen Fall, bei den Angaben zum autonomen Fahren im eigenen Interesse besser nicht.) https://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/tesla-absatz-einbruch-100.html Aber hallo hat sich da was verändert. Viele nicht genutzte Superchsarger sind schließlich nur totes Kapital. | ||
| 6 | 2025-07-13 09:59 | commented | HolgerJeromin ♦628 | Wir haben 40 gezählt. | ||
| 7 | 2025-07-13 09:59 | closed | HolgerJeromin ♦628 | |||
| 4813511 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-19 21:16 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Tesla spricht hier von 32 chargern anstatt 40. Sind da evt ein paar Tesla-Interne? Falls ja könnte man diese eventuell in zwei flächen aufteilen und als private markieren. | Tesla mentions 32 chargers here instead of 40, are some of these possibly internal to Tesla? If so, you could potentially divide them into two areas and mark them as private. |
| 4810747 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-17 19:53 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | supercharger seems to be finished but I can't pinpoint the exact location https://x.com/TeslaCharging/status/1934453462663888980 where are these houses? | |
| 2 | 2025-10-06 06:32 | closed | Gazer75 ♦581 | Charger is in OSM | ||
| 4806840 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-15 11:55 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | I assume this supercharger position is wrong and it is not in the building? | |
| 2 | 2025-08-07 13:51 | closed | eisa01 ♦1,054 | Moved it to the correct location: https://elbilforum.no/index.php?topic=7959.msg1086506#msg1086506 | ||
| 4806575 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-15 09:18 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | is that a typo and should be Tesla? | |
| 2 | 2025-06-16 16:39 | commented | ceirios ♦1,637 | Likely, however this has come from an import so that's how it showed on the data that was imported. A lot of these substation names are wildly outdated and inaccurate | ||
| 4805576 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-14 13:06 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | There's two Tesla operated superchargers here, but one is another brand?? Something is weird? Is this really an edge case? | |
| 4793961 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-07 11:37 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Sind das jetzt 8 oder 10 Supercharger Stationen hier? | Are there now 8 or 10 supercharger stations here? |
| 2 | 2025-06-09 18:05 | closed | Rhoon ♦4,031 | 8. die beiden nordwestlichen elemente sind eigentlich "elektro- oder verteilerkästen" | ||
| 3 | 2025-06-09 20:03 | reopened | stillhart ♦76 | |||
| 4 | 2025-06-09 20:04 | closed | stillhart ♦76 | 💪 | ||
| 4795216 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-08 08:54 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | what is this parking? supposed to be underground? | |
| 2 | 2025-06-10 10:16 | closed | Piagno ♦16,985 | Removed it (old node and nothing visible on street imagery). https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167437021 | ||
| 4794083 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-07 13:09 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Tesla website mentions 12 superchargers here, currently there are 8 mapped. Which is correct and where are possible new ones? | |
| 2 | 2025-11-20 12:26 | closed | Linus W Frische ♦1,237 | Fundet på luftfoto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174904009 | ||
| 4794063 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-07 13:01 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | is this supercharger actually for free? | |
| 2 | 2025-07-03 06:31 | closed | zolikonta ♦19 | Not really. Fixed. | ||
| 4793302 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-06 21:52 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Is the second charger a duplicate of the supercharger? | |
| 4793286 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-06 21:29 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Ist das wirklich ein supercharger und kein Destination Charger? | Is that really a supercharger and not a destination charger? |
| 4793273 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-06 21:28 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Tesla website mentions 20 superchargers, OSM shows 9. Which one is correct? Some survey is needed. Maybe it has been upgraded. | |
| 4790512 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-04 21:12 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | There is a Tesla Supercharger somewhere here | |
| 4782589 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-30 20:41 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Tesla websites mentions a capacity of 16 for this supercharger. Last update shows 12. Which one is true? https://www.tesla.com/en_eu/findus?bounds=51.514225199272886%2C0.33991255078124283%2C51.47061837267257%2C0.20258344921874283&location=128353&functionType=supercharger | |
| 2 | 2025-06-29 17:09 | closed | RobJN ♦369 | Updated (it was 16) | ||
| 4243647 | 1 | 2024-05-13 07:31 | opened | Gregory Williams ♦1,246 | Double-check capacity, layout, sockets, and payment details for Tesla chargers | |
| 2 | 2025-05-30 19:00 | closed | stillhart ♦76 | |||
| 3707771 | 1 | 2023-05-27 11:07 | opened | Gregory Williams ♦1,246 | Tesla EV chargers being installed via StreetComplete 53.0 Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/151069.jpg https://westnordost.de/p/151070.jpg | |
| 2 | 2023-05-30 19:33 | commented | Gregory Williams ♦1,246 | Added chargers. Final details of sockets etc. need to be surveyed once installation is complete. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-30 19:00 | closed | stillhart ♦76 | |||
| 4780653 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-29 13:10 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | I think this walliser Kantonalbank does not exist anymore | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 18:37 | closed | Piagno ♦16,985 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166937900 | ||
| 4778386 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-27 19:19 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | is this glued group E charger really existing or the ionity? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 18:25 | closed | Piagno ♦16,985 | Removed it because: The Ionity charging is micro mapped. The Group-e charger was added way before. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166937324 | ||
| 4776872 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-26 20:23 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | additional chargers have been added by gofast, should be in total 20. I'm not sure if they were append only on this end. see https://app.gofast.swiss/assets/uploads/20241115_084313_retouch_v2_1_e00079a07d.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-27 10:43 | commented | Piagno ♦16,985 | You can add them on this side. The blue "drive right" sign ist visible on aerial imagery. (The round shadow is visible a bit south to this note.) | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-27 16:48 | commented | Piagno ♦16,985 | mit dem adlerblick aus dem zug sahs auch nach süden expandiert aus | ||
| 4 | 2025-05-27 17:59 | commented | stillhart ♦76 | 👁️👁️ woah, turbo-survey | ||
| 5 | 2025-05-27 18:05 | commented | Piagno ♦16,985 | oder zug ausgefallen und deswegen nen umweg gefahren ;D | ||
| 6 | 2025-06-02 06:51 | closed | Piagno ♦16,985 | Added some https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167077357 | ||
| 4776836 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-26 19:47 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Survey required which plugs are available at this additional new gofast charger | |
| 2 | 2025-05-27 07:24 | closed | Lezurex ♦126 | Please don't create notes without any actually new information. This note doesn't contain anything informative. There is always missing data everywhere, anywhere. | ||
| 4762008 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-16 10:03 | opened | --- | https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q134422347 | |
| 2 | 2025-05-24 16:35 | commented | stillhart ♦76 | ???? | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-07 12:15 | closed | redrace ♦3,418 | Kein Place oder ähnliches mit dem Namen! | ||
| 4773569 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-24 15:47 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | # The vkw chargers look wrong I just micro mapped the tesla superchargers next to vkw according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station/Tesla_Motors The vkw chargers look wrong and wrongly placed to me. There's 3 points but seem to be duplicated? I don't know this vkw so it's hard to judge. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station Just close if all is fine. | |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 18:12 | closed | mcliquid ♦8,059 | Position corrected with latest aerials, tags are correct in my eyes. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168152367 | ||
| 4742593 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-04 19:55 | opened | ChrissW-R1 ♦1,035 | https://osm.org/way/1383061587 What is meant by the tag layers? The number of floors? In this case, building:levels:underground would make more sense. Layers in the sense of levels refers to the drawing sequence of the map, i.e. objects that lie on top of each other, such as tunnels and bridges. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 19:58 | commented | ChrissW-R1 ♦1,035 | Added in https://osm.org/changeset/165736836 | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-04 20:30 | closed | stillhart ♦76 | Thanks! | ||
| 4 | 2025-05-05 21:59 | reopened | ChrissW-R1 ♦1,035 | |||
| 5 | 2025-05-05 22:00 | commented | ChrissW-R1 ♦1,035 | Sorry, this not fixed yet. | ||
| 6 | 2025-05-06 02:33 | commented | Piagno ♦16,985 | @Stillhart the question is, if you meant by "layers=2", that the parking has 2 levels (but underground)? | ||
| 7 | 2025-05-06 17:23 | commented | stillhart ♦76 | Fixed it. should be 2 underground levels. -1 and -2 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383061587 | ||
| 8 | 2025-05-06 21:17 | closed | Piagno ♦16,985 | thanks ;) | ||
| 4712273 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-15 18:50 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | this shop is surely not on the square, but where else? | |
| 2 | 2025-04-16 04:58 | closed | captain_slow ♦2,334 | It was a redundant node from the shop a few meteres further north. And due to their website it is closed since last september. I therefore have marked it as closed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165010282 | ||
| 4692167 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-01 20:52 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | does this path still exist? survey required | |
| 2 | 2025-05-19 09:33 | commented | Lezurex ♦126 | It's marked as private, (legal) survey is probably not possible. I can't see a path on the 2021 orthophoto, likewise on the 2022 Swissimage. Obviously, one can walk on the grass, but there are no indications of a (informal) path. If you want to, go ahead and remove that part of the path. | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-25 21:54 | closed | Taktaal ♦4,881 | these paths don't exist | ||
| 4664923 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-15 08:59 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | survey required. building looks like a shed, but has grown and has an adress? | |
| 2 | 2025-04-30 07:14 | closed | jens-OSM ♦13 | I've just changed the polygon, added the shed tag and added the address. | ||
| 4645696 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-28 19:27 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | strasse auf grenze | Street on border |
| 2 | 2025-03-04 16:32 | closed | habi ♦6,490 | Resolved with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163209366 by noteSolver_plugin/0.5.0 | ||
| 4637691 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-22 20:09 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Ich dachte dieser Innengang ist gekrümmt? | I thought this inner corridor was curved? |
| 2 | 2025-03-07 15:17 | closed | captain_slow ♦2,334 | Das stimmt, das ist er. Ich habe das entsprechend angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163331464 | ||
| 4568470 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-29 20:45 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | road layout has changed significantly | |
| 2 | 2024-12-31 20:21 | commented | Taktaal ♦4,881 | can you please take a picture? | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-03 11:05 | commented | Piagno ♦16,985 | @stillhart could you confirm, if the current aerial imagery (swisstopo) resembles the current situation? | ||
| 4 | 2025-01-31 23:04 | commented | stillhart ♦76 | I only saw it on swisstopo, that's all I know :-) | ||
| 5 | 2025-02-01 12:11 | closed | Piagno ♦16,985 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162008273 | ||
| 4605737 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-28 21:30 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Ich glaub das ist so halb technisch ein Fussgänger-Kreisel um einen bewusst platzierten Baum. Fühlt sich zumindest so an. | I think that's kind of a technical pedestrian roundabout around a deliberately placed tree, at least that's how it feels. |
| 2 | 2025-01-29 09:06 | commented | habi ♦6,490 | Karten sind immer auch eine Approximation der Realität, ich würde den 'halb technischen' Kreisel hier nicht erfassen... | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-29 20:19 | closed | stillhart ♦76 | |||
| 4571566 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-01 12:47 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Was ist der maxspeed entlang der Bahnhofstrasse hier? Es müsste 50 sein, wobei das sehr unwahrscheinlich klingt? | What is the maximum speed along the station street here? It should be 50, which sounds very unlikely? |
| 2 | 2025-01-03 11:16 | closed | Piagno ♦16,985 | Konnte nichts finden, was gegen 50 spricht. Die Autos fahren dort auch tatsächlich relativ schnell. | ||
| 4571557 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-01 12:40 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | is residential the right type of road here? Isn't more like a property access or access road? or even a path that allows for service vehicles. same for baumhaldenstrasse next to it. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-03 11:11 | closed | Piagno ♦16,985 | As it's not meant for regular access, changed it to cycle and footway. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160943524 | ||
| 4571554 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-01 12:39 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | is residential really the right road type here? cars aren't even allowed. It's even called weg, not strasse. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-03 11:08 | closed | Piagno ♦16,985 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160943388 | ||
| 4567092 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-28 19:11 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Die Strasse unterhalb des Sihlcity ist grösstenteils in zwei getrennt. | The street below Sihlcity is largely divided into two parts. |
| 2 | 2025-01-06 10:06 | commented | habi ♦6,490 | Aus Einfachheitsgründen der Erfassung und Pflege würde ich die Strasse hier nicht auf einzelne Spuren auftrennen, sonst wird die Pflege der Kreuzung um https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10749641623 extrem kompliziert. | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-06 10:06 | commented | habi ♦6,490 | Ich finde schon die Auftrennung in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155920935 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155920936 überflüssig... | ||
| 4 | 2025-02-16 00:26 | closed | Taktaal ♦4,881 | Eine Service Road richtungsgetrennt zu machen ist recht überflüssig... | ||
| 4562457 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-25 10:13 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | I struggle to fix the max speed in all directions in this tunnel. What is it? | |
| 2 | 2024-12-25 14:35 | closed | habi ♦6,490 | Here's a query that finds motorways around here *without" maxspeed: https://osm.li/MXa | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-25 14:43 | reopened | stillhart ♦76 | |||
| 4 | 2024-12-25 14:43 | commented | stillhart ♦76 | Yes, but what's the missing maxspeed? It's one of the few sections in Switzerland on a motorway without a max speed | ||
| 5 | 2024-12-25 14:46 | commented | habi ♦6,490 | https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=669908327778157 seem to show it as variable | ||
| 6 | 2025-07-12 21:03 | closed | Taktaal ♦4,881 | in this case it's totally ok to leave the tag empty | ||
| 4562482 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-25 10:43 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | What is the maxspeed here? Its zoll, so should be 20, but the last speed limit sign is 50. The other side is 40, which is weird too. | |
| 2 | 2025-07-01 22:06 | closed | Outdoorrookie ♦393 | There are signs "Zollhaltestelle (2.51)" so it is 20 (Art 31 Signalisationverordnung) no other sign needed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168373551 | ||
| 4555137 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-17 21:51 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Gehört exakt diese Wiese wirklich noch zum Fussballplatz? Siehe Relations | Does this meadow really still belong to the soccer field? See relations |
| 2 | 2024-12-17 22:18 | closed | captain_slow ♦2,334 | Meinst du diese Relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/168225? Bei der sind die Fussballplätze explizit ausgenommen (Relations-Rolle "inner"). | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-17 22:18 | reopened | captain_slow ♦2,334 | |||
| 4 | 2024-12-17 22:19 | commented | captain_slow ♦2,334 | Wollte die Note nicht gleich schliessen, sorry. | ||
| 5 | 2024-12-18 22:33 | commented | stillhart ♦76 | Ich meine das kleine Stück wiese bei der Autobahn neben dem Fussgängerstreifen :-) | ||
| 6 | 2024-12-18 22:34 | commented | stillhart ♦76 | Ich bezweifle jetzt einfach mal blind das dies vom Fussballplatz bewirtschaftet wird | ||
| 7 | 2024-12-18 22:37 | commented | captain_slow ♦2,334 | Das ist als landuse=meadow gettagt in der von mir oben genannten Relation. Das scheint mir schon korrekt zu sein. Könntest du noch etwas genauer beschreiben was nicht richtig ist? | ||
| 8 | 2024-12-25 15:08 | closed | Piagno ♦16,985 | Die Wiese hat in OSM keinen Zusammenhang mit dem Fussballplatz, ausser, dass sie derselben Wiese angehört, welche beim Fussballplatz ist. Deswegen schliesse ich die Notiz. | ||
| 4556438 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-18 22:29 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | Ist das hier auch so eine Service Strasse wie auf der anderen Tunnel-Seite? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/438296383 | Is this also one of those service roads like on the other side of the tunnel? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/438296383 |
| 2 | 2024-12-19 08:44 | commented | habi ♦6,490 | Ziemlich sicher, sonst könnten die Autos bei Umleitung ja nicht mehr auf die 'richtige' Strassenseite gelangen. | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-19 19:25 | closed | Piagno ♦16,985 | Ist so eingetragen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160407644 | ||
| 4556425 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-18 22:03 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | verkehrsinsel | Traffic island |
| 2 | 2024-12-19 08:51 | commented | habi ♦6,490 | Ich würde (auch) hier die Strasse nicht in zwei Spuren auftrennen, sondern die Verkehrsinsel nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland als Linie beim relevanten Teil der Strasse erfassen. | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-19 08:51 | closed | habi ♦6,490 | Mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160383350 erledigt | ||
| 4555125 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-17 21:48 | opened | stillhart ♦76 | a pretty long traffic island separates the road | |
| 2 | 2024-12-18 07:32 | commented | habi ♦6,490 | Ich frage mich, ob es (hier) überhaupt sinnvoll ist, die Strassenrichtungen aufzutrennen. Die Strasse https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166991394 ist ja mit `lanes` und `turn:lanes:*` eigentlich schon gut erfasst. OpenStreetMap ist immer eine Approximation der Realität :) Und auch die Pflege der Abbiegebeschränkung https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2226039 würde durch ein Auftrennen der Strasse schwieriger. | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-25 16:06 | closed | Piagno ♦16,985 | Ich schliesse mich hier habi an. Die Verkehrsinsel ist extrem kurz und die Kreuzung würde dadurch unnötig verkompliziert. Deswegen schliesse ich die Notiz. |