Glassman for the last 12 MonthsGlassman for the last 12 Months| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5256007 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Setrocana | 22896 Mud Lake Rd Mount Vernon WA should be in this location |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Glassman ♦1,022 | The county doesn't have this address shown in iMap. But if that is the correct address, feel free to add it. Let me know if you need help. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Setrocana | It does exist in iMap, and County GIS has it mapped properly. For some reason, openstreet has it a thousand yards east. I don’t know how to move it to the proper location. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Glassman ♦1,022 | I added 22896 to the bldg next to 22814. Can you verify if this is correct? If it is just close the note out. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Setrocana | ||
| 5249645 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | --- | The lat\long for 301 South Branson should be Latitude 40.5587 and Longitude -85.657221 but is coming back as Latitude>40.5644120</GPSLatitude> <GPSLongitude>-85.6574030 which is 301 North Branson |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Cliff8651 ♦1 | ||
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | Cliff8651 ♦1 | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦966 | Latitude 40.5587 and Longitude -85.657221 is the point where this note is. 40.5644120, -85.6574030 is the north point is unlabeled in OSM. Sounds like a router error and needs to be reported to app developer. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | Cliff8651 ♦1 | ||
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Cliff8651 ♦1 | The point is correct on the map but the lat\long that is pulled by Nominatim and being passed on is Latitude>40.5644120</GPSLatitude> <GPSLongitude>-85.6574030. When trying to report the issue the results show the issue would be incorrect in OSM since Nominatim is searching OSM data -- is that not correct? | |
| 7 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦966 | frankly this is the first time I have ever heard of nominatim and the osm wiki documentation seams to be less than ideal. | |
| 8 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Cliff8651 ♦1 | Thank you. I don't use it either but the software we use for our CAD system they use it and I am trying to locate the issue with wrong LAT\Long Information. I am trying to look at the Lat\Long at each location to see where it is wrong. | |
| 9 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦966 | I asked in another mode. we will see if we get and answer. | |
| 10 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Glassman ♦1,022 | Using Nominatim, I get the city hall bldg. see https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/search.html?q=301+south+branson%2C+marion | |
| 11 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Glassman ♦1,022 | The lat lon returned is 40.5583648,-85.6567913 See https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=W&osmid=1340854524&class=amenity | |
| 12 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Cliff8651 ♦1 | I greatly appreciate this information and your help. It looks like the lat\long is getting messed up somewhere in the CAD software after it comes in from Nominatim. I was unfamiliar with how to find the Lat\Long that Nominatim was pulling so I appreciate the help. I have never used Nominatim or OpenStreetMap before. | |
| 5173986 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | HmmEmojidotPNG ♦1 | Unable to answer "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road without a sidewalk here?" – State Route 20 [WA 20] (Trunk Road) – https://osm.org/way/303269538 via StreetComplete 62.2: Enough space to park a car. Cars go very fast |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Glassman ♦1,022 | Select one of the bike background layers, for example CycleMap which shows US Route 10 going parallel to HWY 29 as well as using it for a short distance. That doesn't exactly answer your questions but it does indicate that the planners wanted to keep bikes off of sections of 20. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦966 | they are not forbidden here. not that you would want to walk this section. | |
| 4 | ~ 17 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦966 | #fixed | |
| 1768503 | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | opened | Glassman ♦1,022 | What kind of curb ramps, if any are located the intersection? |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦966 | Why is it labeled as a highway=footway with a car parked in this bing image? | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Glassman ♦1,022 | When the flooding is over and since I can't find it on Bing's street side, I'll drive over and take a look. | |
| 5072635 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦38,193 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366768420/history has shop = takeout shop=takeout ? Is it amenity=fast_food ? If not, what this tag is intended to mean? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦38,193 | also, is this POI still existing? website is 404ing for me | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | Glassman ♦1,022 | Yes it still exists. | |
| 1331723 | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | opened | Glassman ♦1,022 | Need verification of Watercress Spring actual location. |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | dannmer ♦18,950 | It looks like this would require trespassing on private property to verify the location. | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | Glassman ♦1,022 | ||
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Glassman ♦1,022 | Even though this may be private property, it doesn't mean someone can not verify the location. | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦966 | moved to USGS Topo Marker, USGS 3D seams to confirm this with water flow ground markings from this area. | |
| 6 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | dannmer ♦18,950 | Issue has been addressed, resolving note. | |
| 4924376 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | kimmmmi ♦2 | A pupuseria business used to be here but they shut down. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Fen <3 ♦214 | Hello! the note is placed on a building that seems to have only a smoothie shop. can you provide any more info? | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | Glassman ♦1,022 | The same user removed the shop in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170849972 I think this note is safe to close | |
| 312621 | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | opened | Glassman ♦1,022 | Need verification of apartment bldgs around 14220 Juanita Dr NE, Kirkland, WA 98034, Inglenook Apts in Kirkland. Property tax records have a different address for the buildings than Kirkland GIS. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | dannmer ♦18,950 | Is this still an issue? | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Glassman ♦1,022 | I believe there is more information that could be added to the area. | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | dannmer ♦18,950 | Is there still an issue with the property tax records and the Kirkland GIS having different address information? | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | dannmer ♦18,950 | updated |