| Note | # | Tmstmp UTC | Event | Contributor | Comment | Auto-translation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5090080 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-12-13 16:43 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Footway cut corner via StreetComplete 62.0 | |
| 5090081 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-12-13 16:43 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Path cut throughs via StreetComplete 62.0 | |
| 5090079 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-12-13 16:43 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Cycle barrier via StreetComplete 62.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/319996.jpg | |
| 4842299 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-07 01:33 | opened | Andrew Chadwick ♦804 | Does this bus stop still exist? There's a pair of them to the SW that are on the X40 route, having the same name as of 2025-07-06. Perhaps this stop has been supoerceded by those? | |
| 2 | 2025-12-13 16:43 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Bus stop still on the south side Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/319995.jpg | ||
| 5090078 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-12-13 16:43 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Unable to answer "Does this crossing have an island?" – Marked Crossing – https://osm.org/node/5520012488 via StreetComplete 62.0: No crossing or dropped kerb | |
| 5090077 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-12-13 16:43 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | In context of overlay "Things" – The Mount (Bus Stop) – https://osm.org/node/332277466 via StreetComplete 62.0: Two stops, one on either side of the road | |
| 5053285 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-14 22:58 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Survey turning restrictions as denoted by signs | |
| 2 | 2025-12-04 22:53 | commented | 4004 ♦3,434 | I removed the straight ahead only east-bound on Bath Road, since there are no signs for it, and lane markings allow a right turn. Russell Street uturn NW-bound not so sure (a bit awkward due to angle), but also can't see any signs for it, and I think no traffic conflict | ||
| 3 | 2025-12-04 23:00 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Nice, if there's no signs prohibiting a movement then it is allowed generally | ||
| 4 | 2025-12-05 18:27 | closed | 4004 ♦3,434 | no signs found, removed all restrictions | ||
| 4940881 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-01 15:00 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Bus lane via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/302663.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-11-30 17:12 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4940882 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-01 15:00 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Restrictions via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/302664.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-11-30 17:12 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5064247 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-23 03:10 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – Bicycle Parking – https://osm.org/node/319156857 via StreetComplete 62.0: Not on street. Check if this is behind wall | |
| 2 | 2025-11-30 17:10 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5054352 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-15 17:22 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Removable bollards via StreetComplete 62.0 | |
| 2 | 2025-11-30 17:07 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5056140 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-17 00:13 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Add steps via StreetComplete 62.0 | |
| 2 | 2025-11-30 17:07 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5023696 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-26 15:30 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Chicaine via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/312791.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-11-30 17:06 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5074011 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-30 17:04 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Unable to answer "What’s the topic of this information board?" – Hydroelectric Generation (Information Board) – https://osm.org/node/11128041406 via StreetComplete 62.0: Hydro power Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/318537.jpg | |
| 5074010 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-30 17:04 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Unable to answer "What’s the topic of this information board?" – Turbine House information (Information Board) – https://osm.org/node/11127705407 via StreetComplete 62.0: Renewable energy Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/318536.jpg | |
| 5072623 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-29 15:38 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Road ends here via StreetComplete 62.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/318363.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-11-29 16:06 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5072621 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-29 15:38 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Path connects here via StreetComplete 62.0 | |
| 2 | 2025-11-29 15:58 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5072622 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-29 15:38 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Asphalt lit path via StreetComplete 62.0 | |
| 2286576 | 1 | 2020-07-30 20:38 | opened | kravietz ♦57 | Empty land via StreetComplete 21.2 Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/16610.jpg | |
| 2 | 2022-08-23 22:11 | commented | eteb3 ♦1,014 | Hi kravietz. I see you added a building under construction here. Was that conjecture, or did you see signs of this on the ground? The picture is a bit unclear: can just see the "empty land" you mentioned. Thanks. | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-13 15:05 | commented | Mex ♦7,210 | no house visible on sat image 2 years later | ||
| 4 | 2025-11-15 16:21 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | House seems to be there | ||
| 5 | 2025-11-15 16:34 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5054351 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-15 16:22 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Cycle barrier via StreetComplete 62.0 | |
| 2 | 2025-11-15 16:34 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5054350 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-15 16:21 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Does not connect to road via StreetComplete 62.0 | |
| 2 | 2025-11-15 16:32 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5048694 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-11 19:32 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | New housing needs adding | |
| 5045851 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-09 19:52 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Survey speed humps on road | |
| 5043701 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-08 16:26 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | In context of overlay "Things" – Royal Mail [RG4 117] (Mail Drop Box) – https://osm.org/node/1734025318 via StreetComplete 61.3: RG4 117D | |
| 2 | 2025-11-09 19:48 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5043703 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-08 16:26 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Path zigzags via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-11-09 19:45 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5043702 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-08 16:26 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Cycle barrier at either end via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/315231.jpg | |
| 5038267 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-11-04 18:26 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | New road being constructed - needs adding to map | |
| 5032009 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-01 01:41 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Raised crossing via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-11-01 15:32 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5032010 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-11-01 01:41 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Raised crossing via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-11-01 15:32 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5023752 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-26 15:06 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Gate? | |
| 2718083 | 1 | 2021-06-18 08:06 | opened | Dmithry | Is there a barrier here? Is there movement? | |
| 2 | 2021-07-30 15:31 | commented | eteb3 ♦1,014 | local knowledge suggests the map is correct: the road is narrowed to allow only bikes to pass through. there may be a barrier that can be unlocked by residents - my source didn't remember clearly. it's also a private estate: legal access not clear. | ||
| 3 | 2022-07-16 20:00 | commented | eteb3 ♦1,014 | clear signs at entrance to estate saying it is private. I would think this bike gap would merit a 'permissive', even so, using the loose definition of that term. | ||
| 4 | 2025-10-26 14:29 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | No sign of anything only allowing bikes, though a space for a removable bollard is present. Seen multiple vehicles drive through Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/312790.jpg | ||
| 5 | 2025-10-26 15:01 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5012260 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-18 16:11 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Removable bollard via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-19 21:33 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5006162 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-14 17:10 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Swing gate here via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-19 21:27 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4377010 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-08-11 01:38 | opened | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | "your local store" duplicated here? | |
| 2 | 2025-10-13 17:01 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Fixed | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-14 18:13 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5002729 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-12 14:36 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Parcel postbox via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-12 16:30 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4568345 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-29 18:33 | opened | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | Crowne Plaza being renovated here, not sure how long it will take | |
| 2 | 2025-10-12 16:29 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Opening December 2025 according to signs outside | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-20 15:04 | closed | 4004 ♦3,434 | reopening on the 8th Dec as The Village Hotel, closing the note | ||
| 5002989 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-12 16:28 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | No indication as to where the shared path ends. Resurvey periodically to see if path extended. | |
| 5002730 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-12 14:36 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | New shared path via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310270.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-12 15:15 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5002728 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-12 14:36 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Max height 2m via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-12 15:12 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 5002727 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-12 14:36 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Dropped kerb onto roundabout via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-12 15:10 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4991951 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-05 13:33 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Fixed bollard via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-05 15:14 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4990702 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-04 12:27 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Cycle barrier via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-04 12:59 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4990701 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-04 12:27 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Start of traffic calming via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-04 12:59 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4990700 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-04 12:27 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Removable bollard via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-04 12:53 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4990699 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-04 12:27 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Bollards via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-04 12:51 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4990698 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-04 12:27 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Bollards via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-04 12:43 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4988425 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-02 16:34 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Turning circle via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-02 16:40 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4988426 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-02 16:34 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Add speed humps via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-02 16:40 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4984085 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-29 11:35 | opened | RodSmith1066 | Whitworth Road is due to open to traffic on 30th September 2025 | |
| 2 | 2025-09-29 14:10 | commented | amosharper ♦206 | Since this project has blown through at least two deadlines already, it might be best to update this junction at the time it actually opens, rather than setting opening_date=* tags on the relevant features. | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-29 14:12 | commented | amosharper ♦206 | Oops, didn't spot that they already had these tags. I've updated the dates to 2025-09-30. | ||
| 4 | 2025-09-30 09:57 | commented | amosharper ♦206 | I'venow marked this road as open, changed the categorisation to secondary per the wiki, and added forward and backward lanes, but it could do with extra work by someone more familiar with junctions and traffic lights in OSM, so I'll leave this note open. | ||
| 5 | 2025-09-30 17:44 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Fixes made | ||
| 6 | 2025-10-01 11:19 | commented | amosharper ♦206 | I think the southbound right-hand turn might also be light-controlled? Looking at the last photo on the following page, which shows a four-light traffic signal suggesting that the turn is also light-controlled. https://www.sussexexpress.co.uk/news/transport/st-leonards-queensway-gateway-road-which-was-due-to-be-completed-in-2016-fully-opens-to-traffic-as-final-stage-of-works-complete-5338715?page=3 I might be able to drop by this week and check. | ||
| 7 | 2025-10-01 16:55 | commented | RodSmith1066 | All directions are light controlled except the left filter lane from Whitworth Road onto the A21 Northbound | ||
| 8 | 2025-10-01 18:41 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Both left filter lanes are priority controlled. The current layout is now correct. | ||
| 4979021 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-25 16:07 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Unable to answer "Do the trees here have needles or leaves?" – Natural Wood – https://osm.org/way/1356031462 via StreetComplete 61.3: A single deciduous tree | |
| 2 | 2025-09-26 10:01 | closed | Mex ♦7,210 | replaced | ||
| 4920236 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-20 14:23 | opened | --- | Our car park. | |
| 2 | 2025-09-24 17:56 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Noted for addition | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-25 08:36 | closed | Mex ♦7,210 | added | ||
| 4920237 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-20 14:23 | opened | --- | Our office 1 Prospect Street Caversham. | |
| 2 | 2025-09-24 17:56 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Noted for survey | ||
| 4804319 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-13 13:00 | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,579 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1935556598/history is Ashley Blooms (shop=florist) closed all the time? Then almost certainly it should not be tagged as shop=florist And if it is not always closed then opening_hours=closed is wrong | |
| 2 | 2025-09-24 17:56 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | No longer here, I will resurvey shops at some point | ||
| 4940822 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-01 12:23 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | In context of overlay "Bike paths" – Foot Path – https://osm.org/way/709363124 via StreetComplete 61.3: Doesn't exist | |
| 2 | 2025-09-03 16:30 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4940875 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-01 13:00 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Pedestrian zone details via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/302657.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-02 19:21 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4940878 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-01 13:00 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Restrictions via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/302660.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-02 10:01 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4940876 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-01 13:00 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Bus lane details via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/302658.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-02 09:53 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4940877 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-01 13:00 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Restrictions via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/302659.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-02 09:53 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4940824 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-01 12:23 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Cycle barrier via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/302653.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-01 18:07 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4940823 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-01 12:23 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Cycle barrier via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/302652.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-01 18:07 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4940880 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-01 13:00 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Restriction via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/302662.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-07 13:35 | closed | Unflappable ♦23 | Amended | ||
| 4940879 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-01 13:00 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Restrictions via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/302661.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-07 13:20 | closed | Unflappable ♦23 | Added | ||
| 4939529 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-31 16:46 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Gate on path via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-08-31 16:52 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4658162 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-09 21:36 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | New roundabout open, old one needs removing | |
| 2 | 2025-08-25 18:08 | commented | marsbar28 ♦353 | Looks like its been added now? | ||
| 3 | 2025-08-26 14:06 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4662856 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-13 12:43 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Crematorium path via StreetComplete 60.2 GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nathan_A_RF/traces/11792297 | |
| 2 | 2025-08-15 18:04 | commented | localwizard ♦860 | looks like it's all there, anything else needs adding? | ||
| 3 | 2025-08-16 20:59 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | No, must have forgot to close this | ||
| 3855338 | 1 | 2023-08-26 18:46 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Bridge or culvert? | |
| 2 | 2025-07-05 19:00 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4822127 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-24 12:34 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – Telephone – https://osm.org/node/10782831080 via StreetComplete 61.1: Telephone removed, box still in situ | |
| 4717876 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-19 18:21 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Road should not be split - this is not a dual carriageway | |
| 2 | 2025-05-28 21:02 | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,579 | how you know this? there are roadworks on aerial, maybe they dual-carriagewayed it see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134237168 | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-28 21:09 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | The Esri imagery shows a series of small traffic islands, not a continuous central reserve. If the imagery is out of date, I do not know. | ||
| 4 | 2025-05-28 22:36 | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,579 | there was some response on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134237168 | ||
| 4116031 | 1 | 2024-02-16 21:12 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | This road should only have one number, not two. Which is it? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 08:55 | commented | Mex ♦7,210 | looks like street images are outdated #surveyme | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-15 01:15 | commented | harg ♦3,428 | Not necessarily a reliable source, but it suggests the two numbers do share the same road for part of the route. https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=A307 "the A307 continues past Richmond station and lots of shops before heading into a one-way system shared with the A305" | ||
| 4 | 2025-05-15 07:49 | commented | Mex ♦7,210 | just relased i replied to the wrong note, sorry. | ||
| 5 | 2025-05-28 20:59 | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,579 | > should only have one number, not two. how you know that concurrence of number roads is impossible? is it both illegal here and actually followed? | ||
| 6 | 2025-05-28 21:07 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | In the UK, all roads are assigned only a single reference number, unlike some other European nations such as France. This is colloquially known as a 'multiplex' | ||
| 4740224 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-03 12:28 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Is this tertiary or an A-road? FindMyStreet lists as an A-road (https://www.findmystreet.co.uk/map?usrn=25100615 extension of A4102?), while Ordnance Survey depicts as a minor road | |
| 2 | 2025-05-28 15:15 | commented | kitsee ♦381 | did a quick survey, I would say its a tertiary however signage is a little bit contradictory. All roundabout signs from every direction show west as gelideg with no A-road and so do the road markings on both directions of the A470 displaying "G'Deg". however the road markings and lanes sign approaching from the east show A4102 middle lane straight on instead of gelideg but the roundabout sign does not. the road is also signed from the other end as Gelideg & Clwydyfagwyr with no A-road. so since a overwhelming amount of signage says its not I think its correct as it is. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-28 19:41 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Once again, signs can be wrong, so don't always trust them. | ||
| 4 | 2025-05-28 20:04 | commented | kitsee ♦381 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground | ||
| 5 | 2025-05-28 20:58 | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,579 | > so since a overwhelming amount of signage says its not I think its correct as it is. so closing it > Once again, signs can be wrong, so don't always trust them. what other source you propose to use instead? AFAIK FindMyStreet cannot be used by us as source due to copyright status | ||
| 6 | 2025-05-28 21:06 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Well one could ask the council the status and I am not sure if there are other sources available. The publicly available adopted roads redirect to FindMyStreet only. | ||
| 7 | 2025-05-28 21:30 | commented | kitsee ♦381 | If the council says its a A road then it will create a conflict with the information we're getting from what is on ground. in such a situation following the osm good practices, what is on the ground wins so nothing is gained by making this argument. I encounter similar problems with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NGED_Import_Project constantly. since the "official data" is wildly inaccurate so I constantly overrule the official data and replace it with what is on the ground. OSM is a map of the world and what is on it, not merthyr council's view of its territory. | ||
| 8 | 2025-05-28 22:01 | commented | kitsee ♦381 | I've been doing some digging. it appears the road was downgraded as part of the dualing of the heads of the valley. It was sign posted as the A4102 when it connected to the heads and on old maps but all references have now been removed but for a few most likely to avoid its use as a through road. the USRN data you were looking at is prob old. | ||
| 9 | 2025-05-28 22:02 | closed | kitsee ♦381 | |||
| 4655245 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-08 00:17 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Park needs surveying in detail | |
| 2 | 2025-05-12 16:58 | commented | localwizard ♦860 | Added some detail - unfinished. needs a proper gps trace to align paths | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-12 17:22 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4740297 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-03 13:20 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Is this bridge open to motor vehicles? | |
| 4056452 | 1 | 2024-01-06 23:48 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Is there really a speed limit of 9.75 km/h on this turning area? | |
| 2 | 2025-04-10 21:03 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Confirmed (mph) | ||
| 4664376 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-14 17:43 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | If main dual carriageway is shown as under construction, surely the slip roads and associated tertiary and unclassified roads should be changed from proposed? | |
| 2 | 2025-03-22 14:47 | commented | Tristan Scott ♦332 | arguably yes. however, as construction on them has not started, they are not there in the real world. and could be confusing to drivers using the map for navigation. or so I thought. is there an option between proposed and under construction such as "planned" ? | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-22 22:23 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | I don't think so. I would suggest as all roads are part of the same scheme, and likely archaeological digs and clearance will be being done across the scheme, maybe change to construction | ||
| 4 | 2025-04-05 15:14 | closed | Tristan Scott ♦332 | Updated the roads to under construction and moved farmland area back to add a construction area. | ||
| 4674405 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-21 15:35 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Source for bypass name? | |
| 2 | 2025-06-11 14:40 | commented | FredMolly ♦36 | I'm not sure why it needs a name. It is designated as the A30, which is a dual carriageway. Admittedly when the road was built it was talked of as the Redruth and Camborne by-pass, prior to the dual carriageway was opened in 1975. | ||
| 3 | 2025-06-22 17:01 | closed | FredMolly ♦36 | |||
| 4535053 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-27 17:17 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Dual carriageway? | |
| 2 | 2025-03-20 03:26 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | yes? https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=51.788404%7E-1.366586&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&pi=-12.9&style=x&dir=257.1 | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-20 10:16 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4655249 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-08 00:20 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | New junction layouts need surveying | |
| 4433699 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-09-13 22:29 | opened | ivanbranco ♦12,210 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11952595969/history place tag missing | |
| 2 | 2025-03-08 00:17 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 3413163 | 1 | 2022-10-25 17:28 | opened | odiroot | Unable to answer "Is there a shelter at this stop?" for https://osm.org/node/1965696560 via StreetComplete 47.2: No stop | |
| 2 | 2023-02-20 20:24 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Check if no bus stop road markings or bus stop road sign or sticker on post (on either side of road) | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-08 00:15 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 3567572 | 1 | 2023-02-20 17:14 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Check bus stop name on bus announcements for this stop | |
| 2 | 2023-02-26 00:16 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 3 | 2023-02-26 00:16 | reopened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4 | 2024-11-11 17:15 | commented | localwizard ♦860 | is it enough to check the name printed on the stop itself? or does it need to be from the announcement? | ||
| 5 | 2024-11-11 17:20 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Sometimes the stop name is different on one of the stop signs, timetable, announcements on the bus, bus website etc. Worth checking for most common name in all. | ||
| 6 | 2025-03-08 00:14 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 3567626 | 1 | 2023-02-20 17:40 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Check name of bus stop on bus stop announcements | |
| 2 | 2025-03-08 00:14 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 3927204 | 1 | 2023-10-06 14:51 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Unable to answer "What kind of internet connection does this place offer?" for https://osm.org/way/33830050 via StreetComplete 54.1: WiFi and Computers with Internet access, and maybe wired too. Must check | |
| 2 | 2025-03-08 00:14 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4626348 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-13 20:58 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Does Tower Road go over or under the A465? | |
| 2 | 2025-02-14 22:30 | commented | kitsee ♦381 | I've been meaning to survey this, original plans say tower road is redirected and connects to this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283670564. however the plans for this area very much dont reflect the final product so needs a survey | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-21 17:43 | closed | kitsee ♦381 | I'm surveyed and updated this section of the A465. this road is indeed cut off. the other road appears to travel in a straight line away from the roundabout. was unable to survey with gps as its private. | ||
| 4623546 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-12 00:13 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Here the road is not separated by a barrier - needs remapping as a single twoway way | |
| 4621006 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-09 19:55 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Redeveloped area needs mapping | |
| 4603908 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-27 14:03 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Buildings completed, add when on imagery | |
| 2 | 2025-08-21 16:01 | commented | localwizard ♦860 | added what looks like 2 care homes. supposedly it has a pub and a cinema! | ||
| 3 | 2025-08-27 15:00 | closed | localwizard ♦860 | |||
| 4577675 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-05 23:27 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Is this really a woodland? | |
| 4305891 | 1 | 2024-06-24 11:38 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | This road is not a dual carriageway. Road needs changing to single two-way ways | |
| 2 | 2025-01-03 11:22 | closed | marsbar28 ♦353 | Feature has been updated since this note (August 2024) | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-04 01:40 | reopened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-04 01:40 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Still incorrectly mapped | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-04 16:00 | commented | marsbar28 ♦353 | Have updated | ||
| 6 | 2025-01-04 16:11 | closed | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Great | ||
| 4569375 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-30 15:03 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Double check speed limits | |
| 2 | 2025-05-28 21:03 | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,579 | how you know that something is wrong with them? | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-08 19:49 | commented | NSiecw ♦101 | The OSM data for speed looks right but there is (or was, haven't checked recently) an issue/inconsistency with the physical signage. If you enter the roundabout under the pin from the A14 there is 40mph signage, if you enter from Saxon Way or Crafts Way there is national speed limit signage. | ||
| 4 | 2025-07-09 14:41 | closed | Thingummy ♦157 | I did not see signs from the flyover side, and there are over 3 lampposts, which in my book makes it 30mph from that direction, but roads approaching from Bar hill say national speed limit as well as street lamps which also makes it 30mph. I have amended. Strictly Cambridgeshire council should change the signage, but the wait time on new signs exceeds my lifetime, Our map should not reflect their inadequacy. | ||
| 5 | 2025-07-09 23:23 | reopened | NSiecw ♦101 | |||
| 6 | 2025-07-10 20:46 | commented | NSiecw ♦101 | There is a 40mph sign when you enter the bar hill roundabout from the a14 junction, in addition to the 40 mph signs when entering the junction from both directions of the a14 and hattons road. the speed limits were correct (apart from the national speed limit signs). haven't stopped to take photos (no footpath on the road between the roundabouts..) but checked today and the linked image shows the rough locations of the signs. https://imgur.com/a/T71MhkB | ||
| 4569358 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-30 14:50 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Permanent speed limits need surveying now junction is open | |
| 4567073 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-28 18:48 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Bollard still here? | |
| 2 | 2025-03-22 20:29 | closed | LordGarySugar ♦1,115 | Bollard was recently updated so yes | ||
| 4564387 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-26 20:47 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Bus routes need adding to bridge | |
| 2 | 2025-07-06 17:55 | closed | SOSOwner ♦19 | Resolved in changeset #168572599: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168572599 | ||
| 4154661 | 1 | 2024-03-15 17:49 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Check advance stop lines at junction and cycle facilities on Priory Road | |
| 2 | 2024-12-20 08:03 | commented | localwizard ♦860 | This one done? Looks like the road has the advanced stop on there now | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-20 13:01 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | No what's mapped still is the advanced stop lines for the previous junction layout. | ||
| 4 | 2024-12-23 12:42 | commented | localwizard ♦860 | I've filmed it if that's useful. if you feel comfortable you can view the file here: https://drive.proton.me/urls/24TNMQB1GR#IP7BoDYitO6I the video starts on the north side of st denys road heading towards priory road | ||
| 5 | 2024-12-23 13:11 | commented | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Thanks but I can't view that on my PC, unsupported file extension or something. I'll try and get down here eventually to survey it properly, including the crossing points. | ||
| 6 | 2024-12-23 13:25 | commented | localwizard ♦860 | no worries, I can update. | ||
| 7 | 2024-12-23 14:20 | closed | localwizard ♦860 | both sides of priory have cycle advanced stops, all 4 directions have marked crossings. |