Natfoot for the last 12 MonthsNatfoot for the last 12 Months| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5218478 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | people128256 ♦408 | Most, if not all addresses in Monroe are missing. I have just added around 100 of them, but I can't do this alone. Help would be appreciated. |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natas74D7 ♦7 | I've actually been working exclusively on Monroe, adding addresses and additional information n such. Been working in small random areas around town. Most recent is around a roundabout on Country Crescent Boulevard. I do need help figuring out addresses in the neighborhood nearby the High school. I did as much as I could there. I appreciate the help, I'd like to focus more on detail work rather than look for addresses 😅 | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦408 | I recently found that Monroe has a GIS with address info (I think it’s in a utility map). That may be of use here. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | make sure the data source is compatible with the OSM license. you can consider an import if appropriate. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines | |
| 5 | ~ 13 hours ago | commented | people128256 ♦408 | I've started a discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-to-import-addresses-from-snohomish-county/148500 | |
| 6 | ~ 1 hour ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Great! | |
| 5509360 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 28 days ago | opened | --- | The West Division Street SR536 Skagit River bridge is closed EASTBOUND for the next six months due to repainting and repairs. Westbound traffic is unaffected except for law enforcement and emergency services vehicles. |
| 2 | ~ 12 hours ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | this is a WSDOT project | |
| 5520088 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 22 days ago | opened | pinecone460 ♦35 | Unable to answer "What type of barrier is this?" – Barrier (Unspecified Type) – https://osm.org/node/13807622067 via StreetComplete 63.0: no barrier, but cars not allowed through |
| 2 | ~ 14 hours ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | what kind of curb is here? | |
| 5518245 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 23 days ago | opened | pinecone460 ♦35 | Unable to answer "What kind of artwork is this?" – Artwork – https://osm.org/node/13807614475 via StreetComplete 63.0: it's a photo |
| 2 | ~ 23 days ago | commented | pinecone460 ♦35 | sorry, no - it's a photo on one side and a mosaic on the other. several others next to it are, too, and i've marked them as mosaics | |
| 3 | ~ 14 hours ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | thanks | |
| 5517956 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 23 days ago | opened | pinecone460 ♦35 | Unable to answer "What is this grill powered by?" – Barbecue/Grill – https://osm.org/node/10719481922 via StreetComplete 63.0: hard to tell, this whole complex is enclosed/private and i don't have access. i could tell from the outside that they're not covered but not what type of grill they are |
| 2 | ~ 14 hours ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | thanks | |
| 5515979 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 24 days ago | opened | pinecone460 ♦35 | Unable to answer "How is this power line attached?" – Puget Sound Energy [SLAR8524] (Power Pole) – https://osm.org/node/12109491183 via StreetComplete 63.0: it's underground (there's a big metal grate here that says "ELECTRIC") |
| 2 | ~ 14 hours ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | thanks removed the wood pole | |
| 5517931 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 23 days ago | opened | pinecone460 ♦35 | Unable to answer "What kind of fire hydrant is this?" – Fire Hydrant – https://osm.org/node/12133238200 via StreetComplete 63.0: there are two next to each other, one is a pillar and one is a pipe. they could both ostensibly be this one |
| 2 | ~ 14 hours ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | copy #fixed | |
| 5491605 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Dis_Pater ♦2 | There is no railway through this neighbourhood - and no railway crossing via StreetComplete 63.4 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | maxwellward ♦2,979 | There is no railway or railway crossing mapped here | |
| 3 | ~ 18 hours ago | reopened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 4 | ~ 18 hours ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190115298 removed railway=crossing from highway=crossing | |
| 5558820 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 19 hours ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | check if guide ;posts are for hike or bike |
| 5495146 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | DougPhilip ♦122 | There is an abandoned railway bridge here (partially collapsed) along a second set of visible track remnants. This track is not shown in the Canvec set, presume that this branch was abandoned previous to import? Surveyed Sept 2026. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | DougPhilip ♦122 | ||
| 3 | ~ 19 hours ago | reopened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Might want to check this is not a road. | |
| 4 | ~ 19 hours ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 5557378 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 1 day ago | opened | Al Gaib ♦2 | "Duplicate" OSM snapshot date: 2026-09-28T17:53:01Z POI name: Caprock Canyons State Park & Trailway POI types: fee-yes boundary-protected_area-2 #organicmaps android 2026.09.29-32-Web |
| 2 | ~ 1 day ago | closed | dannmer ♦23,381 | Nothing mapped at note location, unclear what this refers to, if there's additional info please reactivate the note and provide a detailed description of the issue | |
| 3 | ~ 19 hours ago | reopened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 4 | ~ 19 hours ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413763274 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11842243 | |
| 5553534 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 3 days ago | opened | Trailspotting ♦5 | Can't answer "What’s the structure of this bridge?" for https://osm.org/way/766272575 (Contoocook Covered Railroad Bridge (Bridge Area)), via StreetComplete 64.0-alpha3: Historic wooden railroad covered bridge. Stone abutments and one central stone pier. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/375166.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 19 hours ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed line has most of the data on it. | |
| 5551807 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 days ago | opened | KB-01 ♦585 | This railyard has been replaced by a large warehouse |
| 2 | ~ 19 hours ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | thanks #added / #fixed | |
| 5553093 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 days ago | opened | loamlover2407 | Does any of this railroad spur exist at all? It does not appear on satellite imagery and the "MRA" reporting mark apparently is used by a real shortline in the Upper Peninsula. Curves are also shaped unrealistically and crudely. |
| 2 | ~ 3 days ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,381 | I would remove it, it's described as proposed railway but mapped as an operating line. It appears to go through multiple wetland areas which doesn't seem likely and has unrealistic curves. Even if it's an actual proposed line which seems unlikely, I don't think it's a best practice to map it | |
| 3 | ~ 20 hours ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I can confirm this is not logical from USGS TOPO. Eg. Railroads don't go up and down hills like this. | |
| 4 | ~ 20 hours ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Best to ask the new user that made the edit. | |
| 5 | ~ 19 hours ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I commented here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185385850 | |
| 5256244 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | Marcus PS ♦0 | This portion of the East Lake Sammamish Trail will be closed from May 2026 to end of 2026 https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/dnrp/nature-recreation/parks-recreation/king-county-parks/trails/leafline-trails/east-lake-sammamish https://www.sammamish.us/projects/george-davis-creek-fish-passage-and-storm-improvement-project/ |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | May 26th is the start date | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | note the adjacent roads will also be blocked. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | note adjacent roads will not be blocked except for special moments | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | start date moved to June 1st | |
| 6 | ~ 1 day ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | need some eyes on to confirm closure area. | |
| 5501785 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | What is this "road under construction"? It seems to encroach on the space taken up by Pinehurst station, plus there's another 5th Ave mapped parallel in at least this segment. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦16,143 | ESRI clarity shows this used to be a divided road here... guessing not anymore? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | No idea. We need someone to survey around the station | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,381 | It's the road that was there prior to the construction of the rail line. Can be seen on Mapillary imagery | |
| 5 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | they have not opened it yet. I called ST a few weeks ago. expect it to open on the 30th when the station goes live. | |
| 6 | ~ 23 days ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Opened what? The under-construction 5th ave I see is as if part of a divided highway. Is there a new replacement road for the divided highway, or is it like a drop-off area under the station? | |
| 7 | ~ 23 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | have you looked at the project page yet? https://www.soundtransit.org/system-expansion/pinehurst-station | |
| 8 | ~ 23 days ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Yes but I can't figure out what road is under construction here 😅 | |
| 9 | ~ 22 days ago | commented | pesticides ♦177 | ICT_maps and dannmer are correct, this portion of 5th Ave NE used to be divided by a hardened median. The new road, at least as of last week, is not divided and is open up until the church parking lot. There is also a new bidirectional protected bike lane under construction on the east side of 5th, part of the east sidewalk is being rebuilt, and there is a new sidewalk on the west side. | |
| 10 | ~ 22 days ago | commented | pesticides ♦177 | Fixed the road in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189056177. I'm not going to bother with the sidewalks and bike lane until construction is complete, as the situation is changing rapidly. | |
| 11 | ~ 11 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I went by here and can confirm the cycletrack is and sidewalk had holes in it last week. | |
| 12 | ~ 1 day ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | looks like this has already been fixed. | |
| 5501741 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Be aware, Pinehurst infill station enters service on 30 Sep, 2026. Station details should be mapped out where possible, and route relations will be updated as the opening date arrives. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | From limited photos I could find online, it looks like pedestrian entrances are via stairs on the north and south ends, kind of going straight away from the station. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,381 | #softremindme 2026-10-05 | |
| 4 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | there are also escalators | |
| 5 | ~ 23 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | from another note placed here: Pinehurst Station (Link 1 Line) opens September 30 per Sound Transit. Please verify station node tags: railway=station, public_transport=station, network=Sound Transit Link, add opening_date=2026-09-30. Source: https://www.soundtransit.org/get-to-know-us/news-events/news-releases/pinehurst-station-will-open-september-30 | |
| 6 | ~ 23 days ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | There isn't a station node anymore FWIW, but thanks for copying the note. | |
| 7 | ~ 2 days ago | commented | NotesReminderBot ♦117 | Here is your reminder as requested | |
| 8 | ~ 1 day ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | I did some platform footway cleanup, and updated relations. Please review and then close the note if it looks okay. Thanks! | |
| 9 | ~ 1 day ago | reopened | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | ||
| 10 | ~ 1 day ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | yep looks good! | |
| 5539286 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 days ago | opened | --- | Gate across road. Private road east of here. |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Gate is marked. Road is set to private. Road has been correct for five years. | |
| 5517229 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 24 days ago | opened | aproposofouroboros ♦30 | is this section of rail actually a siding? |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | yes, it looks like someone deleted the primary route. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed corrected the north crossing and added the mainline back. | |
| 5521396 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 21 days ago | opened | --- | This is the Smart Rail Station, not the airport |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | locked in with the official name | |
| 5537942 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | Channel91 ♦52 | This way is drawn through multiple structures. If the way (which apparently was a railway line in the past) is no longer present on the ground in any form then it should be removed from OpenStreetsMap. In this case it would be better suited for IpenHistoricalMap. |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | yep agreed, railway is obliterated by current structures. see forum post on OSM about OHM railways https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/railway-lifecycle-usa/142681/15 | |
| 5549505 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | jonsmith1831 ♦9 | Road extends past intersection to railroad tracks |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5182762 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | check for ENS sign here not listed in MDOT or FRA data |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦16,143 | what does this mean? | |
| 3 | ~ 10 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | https://railroads.dot.gov/railroad-safety/divisions/crossing-safety-and-trespass-prevention/emergency-notification | |
| 4 | ~ 10 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | See ENS link above. Both the FRA and MDOT regulate railroad crossing here. neither have this crossing in their data. Please check for an ENS sign. | |
| 5483400 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | All YTC roads should be marked as private EXCEPT for the public trail running through the north. Right now access is a mix of all types of restrictions. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Omnific ♦2,268 | Which is the public trail? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Palouse to Cascades State Park Trail (aka John Wayne Trail) | |
| 4 | ~ 11 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Can anyone tell me why doris is listed as a trailhead? | |
| 5129228 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | --- | This is the Bedal Gate, it is closed every winter from approximately November to April, exact dates vary each year. Gate blocks vehicle traffic only, pedestrians, bikes, etc. are allowed to continue on. Road opens at the Deer Creek gate. |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | was added 8 months ago https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/50780994 | |
| 5338794 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | --- | There is no camping at this location. It is part of the Jackson Hydroelectric Project recreation lands that is closed after dusk and where camping is prohibited. See policies at: https://www.snopud.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/POL-2017-073-Use-of-Lands-and-Waters-of-the-Henry-M-Jackson-Hydroelectric-Project.pdf |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 4904108 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | pesticides ♦177 | Lots of activity on the Strava heatmap between SE Edgewick Rd and the Snoqualmie Valley Trail here. Is there a path between the two? |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Checked King County Imap these parcels are private property. the lot next to 44670 looks to be owned by the Si View Metropolitan Parks District. (further west) | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | pesticides ♦177 | Added the path in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175837195 based on presence of graded trail/road on USGS 3D Elevation Program imagery and relatively high use on Strava global heatmap. Still needs survey to determine access (permissive or private -- check if there's any signage). | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | pesticides ♦177 | Also need to check the nature of the creek crossing. Is there a culvert or do you have to ford it? | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | its a bridge as there are two major flat spots on both side in USGS 3D | |
| 6 | ~ 11 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | there did not look like any signage on trail side. | |
| 5090176 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | BHSPitMonkey ♦79 | New accessible curb installation underway along this crossing via StreetComplete_ee 61.1 |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | which curb? photos please :) Thanks, happy mapping! | |
| 3 | ~ 11 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | it is complete | |
| 5532255 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | barefootstache ♦574 | Path bridge wood handrail yes via StreetComplete_ee 63.4 |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | added thank you | |
| 4587029 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | John1946@ ♦1 | Edmonds to Kingston Ferry does not seem to connect with roads. Route always takes the long way around whereas the Seattle to Bainbridge ferry route does work. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | khevans ♦22 | Did you resolve this? I noticed that you made an edit on the route and I tried the 3 mappers in iD and they now route via the Kingston-Edmonds ferry | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | John1946@ ♦1 | It's not resolved. In OSMAND when I started a track on Bainbridge Island to Kingston then to Edmonds via ferry it worked fine. As soon as I tried to extend the track to Lake Forest Park - Wa Hwy 522 the program re-routed back across the ferry to Bainbridge Island and took the BI ferry to Seattle to get to Lake Forest Park. The problem lies on the Edmonds ferry dock. There was a gap between the road on the dock and the road exiting the dock. I tried to connect the two road ends but it didn't solve the problem. I think someone with way more expertise than I should take a closer look. I just tried the track again in OSMAND and it still routes back to Bainbridge Isl. and Seattle. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | khevans ♦22 | I opened an issue on the OsmAnd Github: https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/22306 and it looks like their team will take a deeper look at the problem. | |
| 5 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | per this note. using my favorite router. if I move the start point beyond the Kingston Ferry Dock (in the water) it will route through Edmonds. but as soon as I place it on the Kingston dock it goes around. now after looking at the Kingston Dock it is the only one without reversible bridge decks leading to the ferry. I will say that if I place the end point in the water it will navigate to the water point through the Kingston Dock. So there is something more going on here. | |
| 6 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | When I say go around it does not use any of the ferries. | |
| 7 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | with a turn of events to this note my favorite router works just fine on the app. | |
| 8 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Jbell4588 ♦3 | I tested current Comaps and OsmAnd web routing, placing points directly on the Edmonds and Kingston dock ways, routing points located close inland and offshore, and including multi-leg routes extending inland. I was unable to reproduce the ferry avoidance behavior. For context, Comaps uses a GraphHopper-based router, and OsmAnd web uses a OsmAnd specific routing backend. This suggests the issue may be resolved in current OSM data or may have been router-specific or version-dependent. | |
| 9 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Hmm. Does it also avoid all ferries if you replicate this experiment on another ferry line? What if you set the start location to a bridge-free island (like Vashon)? Maybe that will help narrow down the issue. | |
| 10 | ~ 11 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I have seen no change in this and it looks to be an app based problem. | |
| 5537449 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 13 days ago | opened | pesticides ♦177 | What's the nature of this barrier? Does it still exist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3157114106 I don't see anything here on recent aerial imagery. |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 5537444 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 13 days ago | opened | pesticides ♦177 | I see a fence here on aerial imagery. Is there a gate, and is it locked? |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | yes | |
| 5537513 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 13 days ago | opened | pesticides ♦177 | Does this path connect through to the elementary school? Is there a gate, and is it locked? I also see some unmapped paths within the school property on aerial imagery, but I'm not sure which have fences/gates. |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | yes it does | |
| 3 | ~ 11 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | there is a gate/style of some kind on this location. | |
| 5521742 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 21 days ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Crossing has Road signs for bike crossing but not Road markings. See street imagery via StreetComplete 63.2 |
| 5521741 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 21 days ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Unable to answer "What surface does this road have?" – Track / Land-Access Road – https://osm.org/way/5846702 via StreetComplete 63.2: No road found at trail |
| 5517316 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 24 days ago | opened | --- | Pinehurst Station (Link 1 Line) opens September 30 per Sound Transit. Please verify station node tags: railway=station, public_transport=station, network=Sound Transit Link, add opening_date=2026-09-30. Source: https://www.soundtransit.org/get-to-know-us/news-events/news-releases/pinehurst-station-will-open-september-30 |
| 2 | ~ 23 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | closing note due to duplicates | |
| 5517884 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 23 days ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Is this an error? Operator=Union Pacific even though it is named for BNSF Railway? |
| 2 | ~ 23 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 5341883 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | pesticides ♦177 | Trail reopened with bypass for damaged portion: https://www.seattlebikeblog.com/2026/06/12/palouse-to-cascades-trail-reopens-with-new-gravel-bypass-of-atmospheric-river-slide-area/ |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Thanks, Changed | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | reopened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | some one will need to GPS it for the bypass | |
| 4 | ~ 23 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | it has been corrected | |
| 5389737 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦221 | Lot demolished |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Is it now construction or brownfield? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | pseudoautochiria ♦6 | I'll go over there sometime this week and check. | |
| 4 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | construction | |
| 5431906 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | pesticides ♦177 | Is there still a bridge here? I don't recall seeing one when I went past a couple weeks ago, nor is one visible on Bing aerial imagery. |
| 2 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138644571 here is what the change set states | |
| 3 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | the bing, Esri, etc is from 2022 and the change set is from spring of 2023. I found an aerial image from 2023 and can see what looks like a log bridge in this area. | |
| 4933446 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | bryandetwiler ♦2 | Camping in this area is strictly prohibited as indicated by NPS signage in the area. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | bryandetwiler ♦2 | Gaia still shows a tent icon, although it is not visible in OSM. | |
| 3 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | what about James Camp? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5788121054 | |
| 5258727 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | note this entrance will be under construction this summer 2026 |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Sequim Bay State Park will be completely closed from June 5th through September 15th, 2026, due to Construction | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,381 | #softremindme 2026-09-25 | |
| 4 | ~ 24 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | looks to have been completed no note on service website | |
| 5503590 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | WolfieWolf | This bridge is out and has been since May 2016. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | WolfieWolf | https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-lyndale-bridge-closed-1.3564223 Guardrails are installed across the roadway. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | WolfieWolf | Bridge is way 207998987. Closed May 2016 — supporting piles rotted through, guardrails installed across the roadway, closed indefinitely. CBC report: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-lyndale-bridge-closed-1.3564223 — I live on this road and am the only residence on this side. Routers still send drivers across; they reach the barricade and turn around. Suggest motor_vehicle=no on the bridge way | |
| 4 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | leaving note. but it is not a road anymore | |
| 5477367 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | --- | Flock camera, facing South toward railroad X-ing, viewing roadway and sidewalk. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | dannmer ♦23,381 | unverified anonymous note | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | StarlingA ♦3 | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | StarlingA ♦3 | I can verify it is there. It is also visible on Google Street View | |
| 5 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Google is never a valid source for OSM. | |
| 5512164 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 26 days ago | opened | --- | This railroad is crossabke and bike routing should permit the bike trail to cross from east to west. |
| 2 | ~ 24 days ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | nothing actionable here. | |
| 5497799 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Kchau74 ♦1 | The intersection and rail crossing have permanently closed. New/temporary road diversions have happened which need to be updated. The golf course and bus routes need to be changed too. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | changed the road closure to the construction documentation https://www.dot.nd.gov/42nd-street-demers-avenue-underpass | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,381 | Setting a reminder to prevent this from being forgotten #softremindme 2027-12-20 | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | changed it again after re-reading note | |
| 5488031 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | John Gilmore ♦375 | In context of overlay "Things" – Notice Board – https://osm.org/node/14135520582 via StreetComplete 63.4: The Emigrant Trail in the pioneer days of California turned to the south at this point for approximately three miles, then turned west across the summit of the Sierras about a mile south of the present railroad. It was here that the Donner party missed the trail owing to the early snows, resulting in the tragedy. Tablet placed by the historic monuments committee, Native Sons of the Golden West, September 14, 1929 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/368175.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5497780 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Boballen55 ♦20 | "it is Willard Munger State Trail" OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-27T00:05:23Z POI name: William Munger State Trail POI types: railway-abandoned psurface-paved_good hwtag-yesbicycle highway-footway-bicycle #organicmaps android 2026.07.23-6-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | the way is correctly tagged, renamed the relation as it included "bike" in the name which looks like a descriptor rather than the official name | |
| 3 | ~ 28 days ago | reopened | Boballen55 ♦20 | ||
| 4 | ~ 28 days ago | commented | Boballen55 ♦20 | Willard, not William. | |
| 5 | ~ 28 days ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦16,143 | also heads up there's 129 members of the relation and many of them have this same issue. | |
| 5495143 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | --- | Winston-Salem Southbound Railway HPTD Branch Milepost Prefix is "H". Ref is "WD". |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,381 | #softremindme 2026-10-12 | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | could not confirm this as true | |
| 5495136 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | --- | Winston-Salem Southbound Railway Main Milepost Prefix is "W". Ref should be "WD" |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,381 | #softremindme 2026-10-12 | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5495125 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | --- | Norfolk Southern Belews Creek Spur is not showing up on OpenRailwayMap. BC is the Milepost Prefix for Belews Creek Spur. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,381 | #softremindme 2026-10-12 | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | can't help the openrailmap.org try openrailwaymap.app | |
| 5495649 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | ianrbuck ♦155 | Unable to answer "What barriers are used at this railroad crossing?" – Marked Crossing – https://osm.org/node/7429646017 via StreetComplete_ee 63.4: No railroad crossing here. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed all three of these, Thanks https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188502269 | |
| 5495645 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | ianrbuck ♦155 | Unable to answer "What barriers are used at this railroad crossing?" – Railroad-Road Crossing – https://osm.org/node/34635689 via StreetComplete_ee 63.4: I don't think this is a railroad crossing. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5495648 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | ianrbuck ♦155 | Unable to answer "What barriers are used at this railroad crossing?" – Crossing With Pedestrian Signals – https://osm.org/node/7429646009 via StreetComplete_ee 63.4: No railroad crossing here. It is a pedestrian crossing, though. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5348324 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | "Are there bus stations named correctly? They are on 24th St and named 23rd." OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-27T00:05:23Z POI name: 23rd Avenue East & East Galer Street POI types: public_transport-platform highway-bus_stop wheelchair-yes #organicmaps android 2026.05.27-11-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Nope. According to the April 2026 GTFS feed, stop IDs 29300 and 29320-29361 all start with "24th Avenue". Good catch. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | we need a King County Metro OSM Maintainer. All of KCM needs attention. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | Agreed. I wish bus/train/etc routes were more simple to setup. Beyond misnamed stops, many stops aren't in the correct relations to be used by the apps for routing. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I messaged the ST maintainer. | |
| 5468468 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Jonah Jameson ♦8 | Unable to answer "How are the footpath and bicycle path laid out here?" – underground: Foot Path – https://osm.org/way/59229751 via StreetComplete 63.4: Cyclists are required to walk their bikes under the rail bridge |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | go it set to dismount | |
| 1547863 | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | opened | phidauex ♦465 | When the Cowboy Trail cycleway officially opens from Valentine heading west, the trail (which is marked, but listed as highway=proposed) should be changed to highway=cycleway. |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | any updates on this? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,381 | there's heat map activity but it doesn't appear to be a paved trail on aerial imagery. Most of the activity are walking/running | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | the route is not a "paved" trail it is crushed limestone. the rails have been removed but the land owner has not officially designated it as trail yet. there are sections further east that are open, around Gordon. People have said they have used this route but there are still bridges that are sketchy or not passable. the route will go to just outside Chadron to the east where active rail begins again and this trail/route is already designated as a portion of the Great American Rail Trail. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Chadron and Gordon are to the west of here. | |
| 5437539 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | Geovelo_Notes | Aménagement cyclable non repertorié New protected bike lane replacing regular bike lane between NE 43rd St and NE 67th St Photo·s et/ou informations disponibles ici: https://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/135938 (This note has been created from Geovelo) |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | this note is in the wrong location. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | the image location is correctly mapped and bike lane is tagged in road way. | |
| 5467642 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | bosen li ♦1 | The official website of twevle at u-district clearly provides their phone number, but this option is not available on osm. Please verify before joining. https://www.americancampus.com/student-apartments/wa/seattle/twelve-at-u-district |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | bosen li ♦1 | phone number is 2067297777, Please verify and add it to the OSM property feature. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | What verification is needed? | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | you can add phone number using this key in OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone | |
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Yes, but maybe it needs to be "verified" first somehow?? | |
| 5401578 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | KGo ♦3 | Unable to answer "What kind of memorial is this?" – WWI Memorial (Site) – https://osm.org/relation/16510470 via StreetComplete 63.2: Does not exist |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Described as "58 sycamore trees lining Memorial Way." | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | these are the trees. this has come up before. it was for a war if I remember right. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | looks like someone removed it. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | oh nvm. I think the plaque is up on the columns at the head of the drive. | |
| 7 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 3749885 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | --- | The 556 stops here now - it doesn't continue to northgate |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | the whole King County Metro needs an OSM maintainer. | |
| 3932688 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | pinecone460 ♦35 | Unable to answer "Is there tactile paving at the top and bottom of these steps?" for https://osm.org/way/1105904563 via StreetComplete 54.0: Each step has tactile paving on top of it. There's no indication that you've reached the bottom, other than the lack of continued tactile paving. The paving at the top of each step (including at the top of the stairs) seems dangerously close to the edge of the step in terms of providing warning — I assume that by the time someone noticed it was there, they would be about to go down. This is consistent for many of the stairways I have seen on the UW campus. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | there are no tactile markings here.. | |
| 5467201 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Chloe Chung ♦2 | Oliver Hall is also where the Central Kitchen of Bay Laurel Catering, the embedded catering service for UW, is located. It is not accessible to the public but this information should be added as it's the main site of operations. https://hfs.uw.edu/eat/bay-laurel-catering/ |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I added it as a community kitchen and set access to private.. with all the information you provided. | |
| 5022103 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | tobji ♦184 | Construction https://facilities.uw.edu/projects/anderson-hall-renovation |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | complete new exterior | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | reopened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | Christian Rolfson | building reopened April 10th https://environment.uw.edu/news/2026/04/historic-anderson-hall-re-opens-its-doors-after-major-renovation/ | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | reopened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 6 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | still need to add the new exterior | |
| 7 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | mostly fixed the exterior | |
| 5246137 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦221 | As mapped this loop is implausibly wiggly. Survey or find unobstructed imagery to refine the geometry. Note that legally this is not a roundabout but a four-way stop with fountain at the center. |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦16,143 | 2020 orthoimagery shows it well... I dinked around with it and then decided it should be mapped as normal divided streets here more or less. I'll try to tackle that soon if someone else doesn't. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | mostly this is not a roundabout. it is a four way stop with a thing in the middle. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141307223/history | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Oh boy, circle intersection identification. This one is a tiny big ambiguous because of the stop signs on the way in, but I think making the circle circular and setting junction=circular would probably be most accurate? There's lots of material on the wiki; see some photos at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout | |
| 6 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | I went ahead and updated this to that. Please disagree & discuss. Or close the note if you think this is correct. Thanks! | |
| 7 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | or I guess it could be something like a traffic_calming thing in the middle of a highway=stop stop=all... | |
| 8 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Set it to traffic calming island in the middle of a standard junction as no one-way signs present. | |
| 9 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Is it a highway=stop stop=all though, instead of several minor stops? | |
| 10 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | yes it is stop=all | |
| 11 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | closing note | |
| 4699422 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Brian'sPants ♦14 | This appears to be a buried pipe that collects from a stream to the south and crosses Highway 99. May also have some connection to the canal to the north along the rail road. This area is the side of a mountain and slopes steeply upward to the west so it need an on-site survey. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Anyone want to update this? | |
| 4595625 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | gpserror ♦12,108 | some of these tracks are marked as service=spurs, some are unmarked type, should they also be spurs or should they be service=yard? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,407 | Where are those rail mappers when you need them? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Headstand3483 ♦1 | Technically these would be called "industrial leads" but that terminology doesn't exist here. This spot would be considered a yard due to multiple parallel tracks serving this industry. I'll look at renaming them | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | @headstand "industrial lead" is usage=Industrial. Spurs can also be leads. usually unless a yard has been classified as a yard its one of the other things. And when it comes to industrial it could be anything. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,108 | Thanks for looking into it, some more to the north. I wanted a way to post process these away via software for a car driving map hence the distinction. | |
| 5410393 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | brendan77 ♦635 | The rail bridge over the road was removed via StreetComplete 63.2 |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | imagery has not updated yet will need a local mapper | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | found a news article | |
| 5464422 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | RLiner ♦27 | The tracks off the CN&L should be classified as a spur from the junction to a little bit past the crossing, the ties and rails are still there. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | is the crossing still present with rail and the crossing panels? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | the imagery shows this spur being used to store train cars so this is railway=disused rather than abandoned. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | the section in question is set to spur. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | in the 2025 imagery from Esri I see no rails in the roadway and the line is set to spur. | |
| 5294975 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Intrinsical ♦83 | is this a real designated crossing? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,108 | Well a road and a rail cross here, so it is a crossing... don't see any issues here IMHO? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | its a private crossing If you want to report it to the FRA go right ahead. it could be 918321W misplaced. | |
| 5294974 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Intrinsical ♦83 | should there be turn restrictions here? |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | no | |
| 5294973 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Intrinsical ♦83 | should there be turn restrictions here? |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | no | |
| 5361823 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Adam850 ♦203 | CORP is operating this rail line south to Mount Vernon rd in Springfield. UP still owns it, and has trackage rights. Docket FD36818. All of this track needs split owner and operator tags. This is the northern extent MP 660.58. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | will need a formal document to know the limits of this lease. Mp616 to milepost 660.58; (2) the Springfield and Marcola Industrial Leads from milepost 646.58 to milepost 648.39 in Springfield, Or.; and (3) the Coos Bay Industrial Lead from milepost 648.2 to milepost 652.11 in Eugene, Or | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5361860 | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5412535 | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Adam850 ♦203 | Document is FRA Docket FD36818. | |
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | copy above is from Document is FRA Docket FD36818. | |
| 5474284 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦205 | These trails are inaccurate and missing several connections. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | strava shows the current lines where the trails are. | |
| 3715308 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | BlueGiraffe256 ♦1 | This road is completed |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,381 | Road construction reported as completed, not sure if this is correct | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | it was completed in 2023 but this is a new project. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | zsjeff ♦0 | This road is under construction and not open. The current configuration for I-90 is shown correctly. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | thanks for the update. could you add a check date to the road segment if you have not? | |
| 4852302 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | hdevine825 ♦713 | Center running bike turn lanes via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/290279.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | added correctly, | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | reopened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | people128256 ♦408 | why was this reopened? | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I am told that images disappear when closed | |
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | people128256 ♦408 | What do you mean? | |
| 7 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | street complete images disappear when not linked to a note. | |
| 8 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | someone may still want to micro map this. | |
| 9 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | hdevine825 ♦713 | I've uploaded the photo to the PNW panoramax instance so that it remains available. https://pano.locus.sbs/sequence/177be832-2101-48da-bbf8-5a7190e046f3 | |
| 4721063 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | 705 Paananen RD, new construction. Please use the route through Little Kalama River Road to Paananen and find the 705 |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | still nothing here. could this be further south west? | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦408 | I'll also note that we can't influence routers' behaviour, if that's what you meant by "Please use the route through Little Kalama River Road to Paananen and find the 705" | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | people128256 ♦408 | @Natfoot I'm getting extremely suspicious that this is someone who thinks that they can use OSM notes to share info on a map (I saw someone similar doing this in Portland, with a note titled "Address"). I'm starting to think that this is the same (based on the way they're telling someone to use a specific route). What do you think? | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | still need to add 705 if we can. | |
| 5456895 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | pathways here are marked with access=private but also have trail relations. Any idea what is going on here? |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,381 | The edit history shows that it was switched to private because the trail is blocked by locked gates. There's plenty of heat map activity on this path including the part near the gate to the west of the note location. Perhaps it was locked two years ago when the edit was made but the heat map doesn't appear to show a locked gate. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | people128256 ♦408 | Do you suggest that its access be changed then? | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,381 | Not sure, this site might have more info:: https://www.columbiaslough.org | |
| 3437417 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | stn8188 ♦38 | There is no height limit on this road, or vertical obstructions at all via StreetComplete 49.0 |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,407 | There is an underpass under a "Great Valley Trail" about a mile north on this road. I'm not sure if it actually exists or whether it is bad/incorrect data from the railroad fanboys. I've split up this way so the area of interest under the potential bridge is seperate. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | stn8188 ♦38 | Ah ok, I see what you mean. If/when I travel the road again I'll try to improve it. Thank you. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | dannmer ♦23,381 | The Great Valley Trail is very active on the Strava heat map. Road may not have any posted height restrictions though | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,407 | The quest was referring to: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127611146/history No street imagery though. | |
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | looks like this was fixed | |
| 3702853 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | jacobwhall ♦287 | A few of these train track names appear to be cut off |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,108 | Please elaborate. My guess is that perhaps these rails https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14759281 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14759296 and maybe more should have something to do with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago,_Rock_Island_and_Pacific_Railroad but please validate before changing, or of someone has a better reference...please note and/or fix. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | jacobwhall ♦287 | Thanks for your reply, I wish I had more information about this. I just noticed that the names are literally cut off, e.g. "Chicago Rock Island and Pacifi" on the OpenStreetMap site and iD editor. Maybe they reached the character limit of a tag? | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | it was due to a tiger import. these are all old names in this area and have merged long ago. | |
| 5367507 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | brendan77 ♦635 | Unable to answer "What barriers are used at this railroad crossing?" – Railroad-Road Crossing – https://osm.org/node/2383921025 via StreetComplete 63.2: There are barrier arms, but also a sign saying that the barrier arms have been deactivated |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | is the red tag in the middle of the track still there? see the mapillary images. this line probably can be set to disused | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | we can also set the crossing to disused as well | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | brendan77 ♦635 | Red tag still in middle of tracks Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/358077.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/358078.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/358079.jpg | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5445370 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | johnhollowell ♦223 | There is a gate here via StreetComplete 63.4 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5445371 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | johnhollowell ♦223 | Unable to answer "What barriers are used at this railroad crossing?" – Railroad-Road Crossing – https://osm.org/node/7100448967 via StreetComplete 63.4: Rail is below bridge with road |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | check | |
| 5428396 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | --- | I looked at the ALPR camera map around here, and I'm really worried about how license plate readers can track people without proper consent or a warrant. Please make sure any decisions about Flock Safety—like contracts, renewals, pilots, or expansions—are discussed publicly before approval. We need a public vote, a data sharing audit, and a policy that prevents their use for immigration enforcement, reproductive healthcare investigations, protest monitoring, or any other sensitive tracking. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | not an OSM related comment | |
| 5439248 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | WHS Contributor ♦19 | Thoughts on whether this path should be retagged as a sidewalk? It looks like a plain sidewalk when I look at it from Streetside. I've asked the last editor for their thoughts as a changeset comment but might as well ask the general community. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Looks like an MUT (multi-use trail) to me. Note the wider, asphalt surface and larger margin between the train and road bed as compared to the sidewalk on the other side. Also, look at the small diamond hazard sign intended for bicyclists, on the far side of the trail around https://osm.org/go/WIdcUecAm. I don't know why there is this trail here -- presumably some active transport route connection to the high school, but I don't see how it fits into the broader urban trail network -- however, it looks to me like it definitely isn't a normal sidewalk. I believe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Natfoot does a great deal of work with trail networks around here, so you might consider messaging them for input. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | From what I can remember this does look like a multi use path and has been tagged this way for 13 years. I see no reason to change it. it often separates more from the road than a simple sidewalk though the lower sections could be labeled as sidewalks. https://www.mapillary.com/app/index/natfoot?pKey=319944192897422 | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | KTibow ♦4 | TIL. "larger margin between the train (*trail) and road bed as compared to the sidewalk on the other side" I'm not seeing this though, can you elaborate? | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Well, it's just a heuristic I used, not necessarily a requirement for a path to be considered an MUT. And, now that I'm looking back at it, I think maybe I was mistaken when looking at the aerial imagery the first time—the sidewalk on the west side *does* indeed seem to have a pretty decent margin of grass between the curb and sidewalk, comparable to the one on the east. But, somewhere around https://osm.org/go/WIdcVXOHk?m= the sidewalk moves right up to the curb to get around a retaining wall on the hill, temporarily eliminating that grass between the road and sidewalk—something that I think would be uncharacteristic of an MUT. | |
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | KTibow ♦4 | Interesting. Resolving as @WHS Contributor's question about why this is tagged as `cycleway` instead of `sidewalk` was resolved a while ago (bike signs, separated, not to mention nearly 8 foot wide and asphalt). | |
| 5004484 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | michaelthehutt ♦61 | I don't know the name for this type of gate structure. It's not a kissing gate, I don't think. It's just there to get cyclists to slow down enough that they don't eat it on the upcoming rails. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | michaelthehutt ♦61 | You'll have to use the Ohio Statewide Imagery Program background to see what I'm talking about. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | this is a cycle barrier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=cycle_barrier | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 4913821 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | hdevine825 ♦713 | Unable to answer "Do these steps have a handrail?" – Steps – https://osm.org/way/292120208 via StreetComplete 61.2: Bridge, not steps |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5429206 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | SomeRailfan ♦88 | Add former GM rail yard and connection to Sainte-Thérèse yard |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Open Street Map is for current map data. suggest adding note to Open Historical Map. | |
| 5411308 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | Bill Gobie ♦0 | I believe this segment of the Olympic Discovery Trail is paved now. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | yes but also not great. check the mapillary imagery if you want. | |
| 5403907 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | --- | Large metal piece |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Does it obstruct the trail? Is it an artwork? Was it installed intentionally or did it somehow appear here? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Heptazane ♦88 | According to https://www.geocaching.com/geocache/GC1CR11_chs-hunk-o-junk it was part of a spar pole which supported a cable for logging | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Unsure how to map that but go ahead if you have ideas! 🙂 | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14050421137/history | |
| 5412535 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | extent of CORP https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5361823 |
| 5361860 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Adam850 ♦203 | MP616 - this is the south extent of the CORP operator/UP owner tracks. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5361823 | |
| 5404133 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | path needs conditional hours and dates for non school days and non school hours |
| 5385033 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | --- | When getting routed to the El Monte Metrolink Station, the map app has you turn on El Monte Avenue then to turn on Railroad Street to arrive at the parking lot. However, El Monte Avenue is currently closed due to construction. Can the map routing be adjusted so it has people turning on Center Avenue instead. That will lead you straight into the parking area for the station. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Open Street Map is not the router. | |
| 5363058 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Don 47 ♦3 | This is now the trail to the cemetery though the cemetery is completely overgrown. At the west end of the track shown on the map, the trail continues to the north for 3/10 of a mile to the cemetery location. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | added the Cemetery Trail and the Cemetery . there is no strava heat map data to the Cemetery. so it is a mere guess. do you know the name of the Cemetery or something about to add to the polygon? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Don 47 ♦3 | Thank you for adding the Cemetery Trail and cemetery to the map. I do not know the name of the cemetery but continue to research old documents to find out. The map is close enough to accurate to be useful to hikers. I have placed a sign at the junction of the Cemetery Trail and Loop Trail so Strava heat map data should start to appear as the summer progresses. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | reopened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Thank You for all your hard work on this. I enjoy the cross over from history today and route signage that we can represent on OSM. | |
| 5363060 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Don 47 ♦3 | This doesn't exist as an old road or even a trail. It is shown on older maps, but it apparently was never built. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | there are some desire line routes in here in a little different alignment. I moved it to that location. please check on the ground. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | RagnarOlafson ♦2 | Bill Howland is complaining that I have been deleting these lines - maybe he should check the map notes. I did downgrade some of these bogus alignments to 0 Trail Visibility in recent weeks however. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | RagnarOlafson ♦2 | ||
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | reopened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 6 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I contacted Bill Howland directly. | |
| 5349099 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | ljbred08 ♦19 | Map error here: trail crosses the stream with a bridge #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-1-Google |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | going to need more information to do this from here as the stream is in line with the trail data. does the trail cross over to the east from the west here and then cross back further north or south? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | ljbred08 ♦19 | I have gps tracks from multiple watches that may be able to help if I can download them later. Unfortunately I don't think I noted down where the trail crossed back. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | a GPS trace is a start. | |
| 5381804 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | "I think this level crossing isn't here anymore after the bridge removal." OSM snapshot date: 2026-06-10T02:39:33Z POI has no name POI types: railway-level_crossing #CoMaps android 2026.06.05-11-Google |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | there is not one therenow | |
| 5375536 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | TiredFox07 | Bridge is closed. Has been for years. The bridge goes over the railroad tracks. #organicmaps android 2026.05.27-11-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | it is unclear if people can walk over it. removed car access and a few other tags. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | TiredFox07 | People cannot walk over it as it is completely barricaded. Apologies for lack of specificity | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | thanks for the quick reply.. it will show as abandoned and access=no | |
| 5359749 Category: EveryDoor | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Nancy Devine ♦198 | correct tagging should be railway:miniature #EveryDoor |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5366129 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Channel91 ♦52 | Multiple error messages showing up with this bridge carries an abandoned rail line over a river and a road. Not sure how to resolve this. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | set the bridge on the rail line, that should fix any errors you are seeing. Eg. make sure that the layers on all offending lines are set or are at the right "height" with 0, or no layer set being on the ground. Also the road needs the max height added. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Channel91 ♦52 | Everything looks good now, thanks. I've made a note to confirm the height of the bridge above the roadway next time I'm in Southampton. | |
| 5367771 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | --- | West Tarentum Rail Yard |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #added | |
| 5370629 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Coco Lewie ♦91 | My running game says I need all these paths between the river and the railroad track, but they're all on private property. Please mark as inaccessible. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | there are no paths here. there are service roads. set all roads in fence to private | |
| 5363055 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Don 47 ♦3 | This old road/path no longer exists. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦408 | I'm not seeing a road here. Are you referring to a trail? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Don 47 ♦3 | There was once a road here, but it has not been used for at least 45 years. There is no trail here. A faint road grade was visible up to about 25 years ago, but it is now so overgrown as to be indistinguishable from the adjoining terrain. The road appears on some versions of OSM and is misleading for geocachers. I've hiked this area since the /70's and know it very well. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦408 | Sorry, I was referring to the renderer. Do you think it's possible that those systems were using old data? | |
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Don 47 ♦3 | Yes, definitely old data. Many roads and trails in the Columbia Gorge have been realigned over the years, but the old data is still out there. I note many other problems in this area but I'm new to this and need some time to familiarize myself with the program so I can fix some of this. | |
| 6 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | set the trail to razed:highway=trail to let other mappers know to not re add it and removed the trail name and added to the new path identified as the Cemetery Trail. Thank you for the addition and updates. I uses the heat map data and there are none in the area to the Cemetery | |
| 5373910 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | --- | The parking lot at the end of Amherst here connects directly with all three trails shown here. There are established connector paths. The trail that is next to the picnic shelter shown here is actually paved and connects seamlessly from the parking lot. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | yes #fixed | |
| 5328634 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | past opening date for construction check construction status |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Omnific ♦2,268 | Having driven by yesterday, it really didn't look open. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | thanks for the update | |
| 5340887 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | is this flock camera really in the swamp? |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,407 | I would say the stream is not going to give them meaningful ALPR info. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | just going to remove as it must be a duplicate of the one on the road | |
| 4965189 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Shrinks99 ♦173 | Railway tracks are being fully removed. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | still can remain abandoned without tracks | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | reopened | Shrinks99 ♦173 | ||
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Shrinks99 ♦173 | Not according to the wiki: "A tag to map former railways, where the rails have been removed but the route is still visible with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure. " These railway tracks are being fully removed. | |
| 5 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | until the right of way is obliterated it can remain. if rail was still here that is railway=disused.. railway=abandoned is used when you can still tell track has been here. railway=razed is mostly used to let other mappers know that rail did exist here and not to trust other imagery. Eg. deleting is not the option | |
| 6 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | cswilson252 ♦553 | > A tag to map former railways, where the rails have been removed but the route is still visible **with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure**. If there's no infrastructure, it should be removed. | |
| 7 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | @Cwilson you are contradicting yourself. "No infrastructure" and "railroad right of way" are not the same thing. | |
| 8 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | unfortunately "railroad right of way signs" is not well defined and leaves the decision up to the knowledge of the mapper. Photos don't do this justice as the context is often important. Even if this railroad infrastructure was removed deleting is not an option. changing the tag to something more appropriate is. | |
| 9 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | until it the area is rebuilt with something else and it continues to have signs of railroad right of way it may remain set as abandoned. | |
| 10 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Shrinks99 ♦173 | The rails here have been removed for a while at this point and this is represented on multiple image sources. You can see a good aerial overview of the site in this construction update video from four months ago. https://youtu.be/wlwQoEtrEV0?si=YCd_CC9_gfZ9Kkw_&t=93 To be completely clear: this area is no longer a railway. There are no rails, there is no right of way for trains, there is no evidence on the ground that there used to be rails here. If a train is here, something has gone SERIOUSLY wrong. | |
| 11 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Shrinks99 ♦173 | Surveyed 2026-06-19, there are no rails, the entire thing has been ripped out and replaced with pedestrian pathways and trees. | |
| 12 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | still can be left as railway=abandoned if the trails are liner to the trails also railtrail=yes could be helpful here to | |
| 13 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Shrinks99 ♦173 | Video from one day ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvQYNwMPhS8 These aren't discrete trails that follow a previous railway like the Belt Line, West Toronto Rail Path, etc. This is an entirely new streetscape! There are no rails in the same way that there are no rails in the middle of Queens Quay any more. At what point do rails get removed from OSM? Do they stick around forever? Should I be mapping historical rail? The wiki page for railway=abandoned doesn't seem to describe this situation. railway=razed says "Avoid mapping former railways if it is impossible to determine the former route from the ground or aerial imagery. Consider using Open Historical Map instead to map former railways." Can I remove these?? Will people be angry at me for doing so? I'm genuinely trying to follow best practices. | |
| 14 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | @shnrinks99 for some of us looking for signs on the ground can simply be the right of way. if we can tell rail has been there then it often stays. I created this little bit of magic to keep me on track. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Railroads#Life_Cycle I would say your leaning into railway=razed with this one and as outlined it is up to the mapper to decide to keep or not. | |
| 15 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | cswilson252 ♦553 | I’m contradicting my own previous comment with this, but IMO if the rails are present in most aerials but not on the ground (what seems to be the case here) they can be railway=razed safely. IMO In a few years, when most aerial providers update, and the rails and trackside infra (ballast, ties, etc) are no longer visible whatsoever there, it’s safe to delete the track entirely.. (but I’ve personally never been here, and have no idea if a right of way is still present on the ground) | |
| 16 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Shrinks99 ♦173 | Alright. I've removed any crossings and marked all the relevant features as razed. Once more imagery updates I'll remove them. | |
| 5356085 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | railway line no longer Montana Rail Link |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 5357004 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | sofiavmartin ♦4 | "Area under rehabilitation; path no longer in use" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-27T00:05:23Z POI has no name POI types: psurface-unpaved_bad highway-path #organicmaps ios 2026.06.01-1-ios |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5318753 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | akana932 ♦10 | the entire skytrain network should be railway:atc=yes, as skytrain is automatically controlled with SelTrac. i am not sure how to make such a large edit without doing it by hand, so if someone smarter than me could figure it out, that would be great. cheers |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | neondev1 ♦10 | Just a note, I vaguely remember someone making a similar edit a while back and it being reverted, although I don't really remember the reason for that. I could be misremembering though. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_train_control ATC is not automatically controlled. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Trains are controlled by a human and ATC supports the human in operating the train. Confusing but that is the way of the railroad industry. As Sky train is a closed system they don't have drivers or need for ATC and are instead automatically controlled by SelTrac. | |
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | akana932 ♦10 | so, what would you suggest the tag be? Skytrain internally calls it ATC so idk. | |
| 6 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | suggest looking at the sky train wiki. instead of ATC a system called VCC is listed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SkyTrain_(Vancouver) | |
| 7 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Unarmored5156 ♦40 | I've done significant digging and have historical knowledge into both SkyTrain's control systems (ie VCC is short for Vehicle Control Computer, not the entire ATC [Automated Train Control] system as a whole) and also the OSM tagging for such automated trains, and I believe the following tagging would work best for SkyTrain: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway:cbtc railway:cbtc=IL If you look at the tracks, under and next to the LIM rail there's little wires that loop over every few dozen meters, those are the inductive signalling loops, thus the rationale for this tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway:ato railway:ato=uto because SkyTrain is a GoA4 system - heck it's one of the examples on the Wikipedia page for ATO: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_train_operation#Grades_of_automation railway:atc should *not* be added because ATC still implies a human operator according to both the OSM wiki and Wikipedia: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway:atc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_train_control Despite Canada Line using different drive technology than SkyTrain, both systems still are GoA4 and use inductive loop signalling (it's much more visible on Canada Line) so the same tagging applies to it. The last major edit was reverted because it added railway:cbtc=uto which is a weird mishmash of the two tags and was definitely wrong. If the community agrees on this topic I could do the edit myself since it'd be pretty easy in JOSM. | |
| 8 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | akana932 ♦10 | yeah railway:cbtc=IL and railway:ato=uto seems reasonable to me. make sure when you're editing it in JOSM to not get the manual tracks at OMC1 into it. or canada line OMC. Thanks! | |
| 9 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Unarmored5156 ♦40 | Done in changeset/187975005 | |
| 5186773 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | need to come back and fix streams and culvert issues here |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | fixed culverts here | |
| 5099500 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | okainov ♦243 | note to self: update railroadapping based on gps track #organicmaps android 2025.12.16-16-Google |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | most of these "bridges" don't look like bridges and they are in the wrong spots. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I aligned most of it. #remindme 2026-04 | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | resolving note please open again if needed | |
| 5355408 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | EzyPup ♦27 | "Hidden Trail runs through here & connects to "Sunrise Trail," unsure of exact path. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed Please check my work https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184416073 | |
| 5345410 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | --- | This 170-year-old flour-producing mill remains one of the few of its kind still in operation; its history as a “station” on the Underground Railroad also left a mark. During tours of the mill, staff members recount how anti-slavery German immigrant Frederick Graue would hide freedom seekers in the mill’s basement. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | add to Open Historical Map openhistoricalmap.org | |
| 5352017 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | dmjab13 ♦134 | these railroad crossings were removed. the track ends west of main street with a barrier, then restarts after the sidewalk alongside The Wooden Match. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed the issue and backed by imagery | |
| 5352243 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | PixelCompass ♦105 | "There's a little lot here to park at for trail-goers." OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-27T00:05:23Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-parking #organicmaps android 2026.05.27-11-Google |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | looks like you added it | |
| 5116507 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | this area shows the off ramps in a different spot. can someone put a check date on these, |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | goldfndr ♦383 | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/goldfndr/traces/12033427 (I haven't driven it this year.) | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | goldfndr ♦383 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/goldfndr/traces/12397711 (2026-06-11) is from when I drove it on Thursday morning. I did not use the carpool lane when getting back on. @Natfoot good enough? | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I added your check date | |
| 5343863 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | dgcoks ♦2 | I can't figure out the correct way to edit this, but there is a mistake in the Flint Hills Trail here. The trail does not follow the old rail alignment between 5th and 6th Street. The correct trail (going south along 5th St) is already on the map, but the green state park outline does not fully follow it. There is also a separate designated route for horses along Withrow St from 4th St to Auburn Rd, vs. the paved path through town for bikes and hikers. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | So the reason you are likely having trouble is that the relations have not been downloaded. in ID, select the line and click both down load buttons on the relations. this will then allow you to cut the line by pressing 'x' or right click to cut the line. then you should be able to change the line as you need to. Let me know if you need more help | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | MidwestHikerDude ♦28 | I updated the state park border in changeset 184269324 the border only includes the trail itself, so the horse route isn't in the border since it uses a road and not a separate trail. I added the correct usage tags for the horse route in changeset 184268950 | |
| 5343540 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | Path closed 8:25-3:55 on school days; smoking=no via StreetComplete 63.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/351154.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | is correct | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | reopened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | Thanks | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | I added that summer is allowed: access:conditional=no @ (Sep-Jun Mo-Fr 08:25-15:55) Feel free to reopen and/or modify. | |
| 4576136 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | pesticides ♦177 | There's now a shared-use path on the west side of the road, added as part of the Alki Point Healthy Street project in summer 2024. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | confusing but added | |
| 5331191 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Adriangelo2005 ♦9 | "Code is 4048" OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-03T01:52:52Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-toilets #organicmaps ios 2026.06.01-1-ios |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | added | |
| 5340497 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | bigtpun | This correct city here is Lake Stevens. It is incorrect if Arlington is listed. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | bigtpun | Here is the link to county records show correct city of Lake Stevens. https://www.snoco.org/proptax/(S(bzvk03gxihl00r5t0qgzrtcx))/ParcelInfo.aspx?parcel_number=01192200000800 | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | There are no address nodes here | |
| 5341569 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | ColbyTheWorldTraveler ♦249 | Unable to answer "What kind of building is this?" – Building – https://osm.org/way/953644517 via StreetComplete 63.1: No longer a building here |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | no building here | |
| 5339047 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | PixelCompass ♦105 | ""Pay at the pump" is 24/7, but the inside convenience store is 6-10. should this be split?" OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-27T00:05:23Z POI name: Safeway Fuel Station POI types: building amenity-fuel #organicmaps android 2026.05.27-11-Google |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | it needs to be split anyways. one needs to be the building and the other the roof. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | dannmer ♦23,381 | appears to have been updated | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | dannmer ♦23,381 | ||
| 5338886 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | PixelCompass ♦105 | This side road does not connect to the main road here. via StreetComplete 63.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/350702.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed per https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183978739 | |
| 5331043 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | synthfi ♦51 | There are a bunch of abandoned rail lines here (hit edit in iD it doesn't show up unless you do so) I didn't see these when passing by on the commuter rail and I don't see it in aerial. Should this still be here? |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | see if we can contact the original editor to add to open historical map. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | here is the wiki for north america with examples https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Railroads#Life_Cycle | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Ktr101 ♦32 | I am agnostic to where this goes, however I did mark it as demolished. Natfoot, you mentioned that OHM does not allow copying from OSM, is there another way to bring that over? | |
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | if you are the original editor and know your source you may make the edit on OHM. | |
| 6 | ~ 23 days ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦16,143 | removed things here; we shouldn't be mapping things that aren't on the ground now | |
| 5339828 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | --- | Low Bridge 10.5 feet. NO TRANSPORTS. Need to stop directing trucks here. Private crossing if required is just off Serpentine Street to cross the private rail. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | max height is correctly labeled here. though this is listed as hgv=designated | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Rhodez ♦3,639 | fixed | |
| 5333092 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | --- | I guess that there is an accidental change of location of Node: 685700315 from version 4 to version 5 (Changeset #174738267). This node was part of an abandoned railway and the new location of the node change the path of the old railway. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #Fixed | |
| 5328963 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | some_amoeba ♦2 | The entrances to the expressway may need to be edited. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | some_amoeba ♦2 | I overthink everything though, might be fine. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | it is hard to determine what you want from this note. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | pseudoautochiria ♦6 | ||
| 5329321 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | some_amoeba ♦2 | A lot of the information pertaining to route 1 is incorrect. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | all of KCM is out of date on OSM. King County Metro | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | pseudoautochiria ♦6 | True. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | pseudoautochiria ♦6 | ||
| 5182813 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | TriangleMaple ♦440 | Survey and update construction area in lower and upper fields |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | no construction polygon here | |
| 5327429 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | current trail closure in this section https://parks.wa.gov/find-parks/state-parks/columbia-plateau-state-park-trail |
| 5326789 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | On the Scenic App, this road (Cheney-Spokane Rd) does not go through from this spot north for about 200m. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | need to report that to the app developer as it is complete on Open Street Map | |
| 5323770 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | hdevine825 ♦713 | Unable to answer "Is there a shelter at this stop?" – NE 8th St & 172nd Pl NE (Transit Platform) – https://osm.org/way/1052829858 via StreetComplete 63.1: Bus stop no longer exists |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | This is correct. the 226 and the 223 no longer use this section of road way. confirmed with King County Metro. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Leaving note Route relations need to be updated here for these bus routes | |
| 5323772 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | hdevine825 ♦713 | Unmarked crossing across 8th via StreetComplete 63.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/349021.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #added | |
| 4338001 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Nancy Devine ♦198 | Unable to answer "How wide is the road here?" – Residential Road – https://osm.org/way/996978618 via StreetComplete 58.2: Painted traffic circle with wheel stops at center |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | looks good | |
| 5325167 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | hdevine825 ♦713 | Root causes accessible width to be about 1' 8" here via StreetComplete 63.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/349184.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Added leaving note for photo | |
| 5325164 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | hdevine825 ♦713 | Root causes accessible width to be about 1' 8" here via StreetComplete 63.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/349182.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | remove duplicate note with bad photo link | |
| 5324271 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | seascorpio82 ♦24 | Location closed, Wikipedia link should be removed #OsmAnd |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | no Wikipedia links here. check your source is updated. new building being built here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469945866 | |
| 5324092 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | Unable to answer "What kind of fire hydrant is this?" – Fire Hydrant – https://osm.org/node/12125729295 via StreetComplete 63.1: Two fire hydrants here, left yellow, right red controller by middle red valve Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/349059.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed please check my work. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | I was wrong with what the right two are. I did some research into what these are and added updates in https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/183713902. Feel free to change them again if you find more info. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | reopened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | ||
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | More discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183713902 | |
| 5325428 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | albeee🦃 | This is my address, can it be updated to 1721? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | it can, though you can do it yourself if you would like. go to https://www.openstreetmap.org/ use the login your using here and use the web ID editor. Select the house and change the numbers in the address. you can also add the street and any other non personal identifying information. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | seattlefyi ♦871 | @albeee Thanks for asking for this change, and @Natfoot good job providing change instructions. Since it's been a couple of weeks, I'll go ahead and add the address. Please feel free to leave more notes if you notice missing info or errors! Thanks again. | |
| 5324283 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Imagery shows no bridge deck on this bridge. Eg. no trail surface. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | https://parks.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2023-04/Columbia%20Plateau%20State%20Park%20Trail%20Brochure.pdf trestles are blocked | |
| 5320400 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | kosmer ♦24 | Unable to answer "What kind of parking is this?" – Parking Lot – https://osm.org/way/1166031947 via StreetComplete_ee 63.1: Not a parking area |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed removed | |
| 5318608 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | YesNutNovember ♦24 | Emergency phone here (the one about 100ft south of this spot is not there). Photo is facing south from main aisle via StreetComplete 63.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/348177.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5322478 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | wislander ♦467 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – Meineke (Car Repair Shop) – https://osm.org/node/3008908018 via StreetComplete 63.1: Building demolished |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed left address node | |
| 5322453 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | wislander ♦467 | Shared driveway, not a residential street via StreetComplete 63.1 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5322450 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | wislander ♦467 | Connection here, 5ft gap between bollard and fence. via StreetComplete 63.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/348934.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Thanks #added | |
| 3378034 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | tobji ♦184 | Here is some kind of path. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | pesticides ♦177 | Looks like a dirt bike track | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Added | |
| 5035838 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | pesticides ♦177 | Miller Creek Daylighting Project altered stream and trail alignment in 2025. https://www.burienwa.gov/residents/public_works/current_projects/miller_creek_daylighting_project |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Omnific ♦2,268 | Started the process based on ESRI imagery. Needs some cleanup. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | looks good | |
| 5324140 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | YesNutNovember ♦24 | Unable to answer "What’s the height of the curbs at this crossing?" – Crossing – https://osm.org/node/3699976849 via StreetComplete 63.1: Differs on each end Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/349067.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/349068.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5320876 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Is this bridge correctly tagged? it has access=no on motor vehicles but nothing else. |
| 5305096 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Integrity Roofing WA | Integrity Roofing and Repair Street Address 1: 2120 N Country Vista Blvd City: Liberty Lake State: Washington (WA) Zip Code: 99019 Country: United States Business Phone Number: (509) 655-0090 Business Email Address: integrityroofingandrepairllc@gmail.com Website: https://integrityroofingandrepair.com/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/people/Integrity-Roofing-and-Repair-LLC/100087473474588/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/integrityroofingandrepairllc/ Description: Integrity Roofing & Repair is a licensed and insured roofing contractor serving Spokane, Liberty Lake, Post Falls, and North Idaho. We specialize in residential and commercial roofing, roof repairs, roof replacements, metal roofing, and storm damage restoration backed by over 30 years of experience. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | to add log in to openstreetmap.org add POI or point. select business. add information into proper fields. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | This looks like a residential house. Unlikely a walk-in or other public location of the business. Please re-open this note if you have more details. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | reopened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Look at the address @pwbriggs Where is that? | |
| 6 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Looks like a house on N Country Vista Blvd. Nominatim also turns up the location of the note, but I think that's incorrect because the street name doesn't match. https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=2120+N+Country+Vista+Blvd Either way the source Nominatim's using for address data (NAD?) also seems to classify it as a house. | |
| 7 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Could it be the section of road north of this point undeveloped? | |
| 8 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | in the current imagery. | |
| 4204666 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | wislander ♦467 | Unable to answer "Who is allowed to use this playground?" – Playground – https://osm.org/way/1178429270 via StreetComplete 57.2: Whole campus closed to public 10–6 M–F, open otherwise. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | 1000 to 1800? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | wislander ♦467 | 2200 to 600, I think, and I actually think it is probably closed during school hours as well, but those aren't posted. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | oh gotcha | |
| 5317905 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | It’s on North Public Ave across from Casey's Convenience store facing NW-N, MO14 intersection and MO P headed north into Republic. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | What is it? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | dannmer ♦23,381 | misplaced camera note, they added another nearby | |
| 5316894 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | bb010g ♦18 | New building=detached here has addr:housenumber=820. via StreetComplete_ee 63.1 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #added | |
| 5316871 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | wislander ♦467 | Private via StreetComplete 63.1 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I don't think that is what you want. say access=destination? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | wislander ♦467 | You're totally right! I went ahead and applied =destination. | |
| 5316812 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | dawnathedead | NE 99th Lane Is private. Walking or running it is like walking up an owner's driveway |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Set to Ally | |
| 5316825 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Adriangelo2005 ♦9 | "Code: 1815" OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-03T01:52:52Z POI has no name POI types: wheelchair-yes amenity-toilets #organicmaps ios 2026.05.12-1-ios |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | added what I could | |
| 5316900 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | GTink911 ♦3 | In context of overlay "Buildings" – Building – https://osm.org/way/1284505651 via StreetComplete 63.1: Wellhouse for neighborhood, I think owned by HOA |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5308526 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Coco Lewie ♦91 | There is no public trail here. This is all gated private property. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | set access=private | |
| 5311247 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | 0189004217 | No Canada Goose gate. It's marked private property. There is no public connection from the Haggets Pond trails to Evergreen Lane. This should be more clearly indicated on the map. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | foot is listed as yes and someone is using it as there are GPS traces here. | |
| 5311850 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | Private property. No public road or trail. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Reasonable as it is disconnected. | |
| 5314786 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | ColbyTheWorldTraveler ♦249 | Asphalt trail and information shelter via StreetComplete 63.1 GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/crazycolbster/traces/12372591 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | looks like you added it | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | ColbyTheWorldTraveler ♦249 | Oops, forgot to close it out, but correct. | |
| 5314787 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | ColbyTheWorldTraveler ♦249 | Short informal path via StreetComplete 63.1 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | looks like you added it | |
| 5312706 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | IamPersistent ♦641 | there is a gate here on the trail via StreetComplete 63.1 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | there is no trail here on OSM | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | IamPersistent ♦641 | I just upload a trace for it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/IamPersistent/traces/12374088 | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | weblogdryads ♦2,763 | added gate | |
| 5311310 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | jleach ♦39 | I am planning on adding the path to Lone Pine and Ormes, but with the tag informal=yes to show that it is not an official trail. This trail is well traveled and is on alltrails, so its quite well known. I am not considering mapping lesser used social trails. Considering also the access=no, but off trail travel in the NF isn't typically prohibited unless its a sensitive area. I'll leave this comment up for a bit before i go hike it for the gpx. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | the tail that leads to this off shoot is listed as the Douglas Fir Trail a little east of here. Maybe you can confirm | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | jleach ♦39 | you have it mapped correctly, but even the douglas fir trail does not appear to be an official forest service trail. I added informal=yes to see if it renders differently on caltopo, etc. | |
| 5316560 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Alignment needed in this area. Add trails as needed |
| 5308626 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Kovirii ♦1,526 | Missing trails in this area |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5308631 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Kovirii ♦1,526 | Trail names? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | train names are not necessary | |
| 5312874 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | Stone Security Services Street Address 1: 6 Penn Plaza 19th Floor City: New York State: New York (NY) Zip Code: 10001 Country: United States Business Phone Number: (800) 883-8614 Website: http://www.stonesecurityservice.com/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/stonesecurityservice/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/p/Stone-Security-Services-100052098025048/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/stone-security-service Description: Stone Security Services New York operates from Penn Plaza in Midtown Manhattan, offering comprehensive, elite-level security services to the New York Tri-State region encompassing New York (NY), New Jersey (NJ), Connecticut (CT), Brooklyn, Queens, Long Island, and all of New York City. The company delivers a diverse array of security solutions including executive protection for corporate leaders and VIPs, event security for galas, product launches, fashion shows, and entertainment premieres, professional bodyguard services for celebrities and high-net-worth individuals, and diplomatic security for foreign officials and dignitaries. Every member of Stone Security's team is extensively vetted and trained, with many holding backgrounds as retired law enforcement officers, military veterans, and former intelligence operatives. The company prides itself on providing discreet yet highly effective protection services, combining thorough risk assessment and site analysis with cutting-edge security protocols. Stone Security Services stands as the trusted partner for top-tier security solutions in the heart of the Tri-State area, backed by a proven track record and outstanding client testimonials. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | remove duplicate note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5312921 | |
| 5314909 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | keypup ♦1 | No road over tracks any longer #OsmAnd |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | none here | |
| 5314846 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | Signage indicates that West Railroad Ave, West Main St, And East Main St carry the designations BUSINESS US 54 and State Road 237. https://www.google.com/maps/@35.172837,-103.7417324,3a,16.8y,93.6h,86.99t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sfMRg__2eEfa3Y8-7XZfb9Q!2e0!5s20240201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D3.007533592604247%26panoid%3DfMRg__2eEfa3Y8-7XZfb9Q%26yaw%3D93.59744051163804!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDUyNi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | it is forbidden to use Google Maps as a source | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Already mapped | |
| 5314880 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | This building is actually 255 N. Forest st, not 225 as it is currently labeled. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5314073 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | kjsfdhvk ♦2 | "No Not undee construction any more? Appears to be a school in use." OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-29T18:18:32Z POI has no name POI types: landuse-construction #organicmaps ios 2026.05.12-1-ios |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5314864 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | kjsfdhvk ♦2 | "No Not undee construction any more? Appears to be a school in use." OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-29T18:18:32Z POI has no name POI types: landuse-construction #organicmaps ios 2026.05.12-1-ios |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | remove duplicate https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5314864 | |
| 5314848 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | "Organic Maps won't route thru here for foot traffic." OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-03T01:52:52Z POI has no name POI types: wheelchair-no barrier-cycle_barrier #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-4-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | foot is set to access=destination | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | Thanks. I put the wrong tag on there. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183346566 | |
| 5313249 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Coco Lewie ♦91 | There is a gatehouse here to stop anyone without proper access from entering the port. Everything south of here is private property. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5313250 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Coco Lewie ♦91 | From here toward the railroad tracks, there is no Weinberger Road. There may have been at some point, but it's literally just a six-foot-deep ditch now. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | is the adjacent road named for this one? The one with the new railroad crossing? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | gpserror ♦12,108 | changed to 2025 satellite imagery...disconnected.as it looks cut now. | |
| 5269101 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | --- | why isn't there be a double railway bridge marked here? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | the roads are marked as tunnels | |
| 5312929 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | dmjab13 ♦134 | this railway should be siding |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | it is set as yard and seams to be appropriate | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | set usage to industrial | |
| 5308650 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | lstrobel ♦3 | Surveyed one portion of new/old stairwell + path via StreetComplete 63.1 GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lstrobel/traces/12367297 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5311743 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | BIGBADSWEDE | Highest steel bridge |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | correctly tagged with wiki linked name | |
| 5288350 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | Hopefully someone can edit this effectively - a diagonal traffic diverter was installed at this intersection in Fall 2025. Bikes and pedestrians can go through in any direction, but motor vehicles have to turn! Visit the municipal website at https://halifax.ca/transportation/cycling-walking/expanding-network/allan-oak-local-street-bikeway and scroll down to "Allan-Harvard diagonal traffic diverter" for a graphic. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | this can be added with turn restrictions. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | QuigleyJones ♦3,311 | ||
| 4230371 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Luke46060 ♦63 | Has bike lanes both sides via StreetComplete 57.2 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | has been added | |
| 2488182 | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | opened | LindseyS | there is a protected bike lane from Kirkwood to Patterson on both sides of the road via StreetComplete 28.1 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | has been added | |
| 4567192 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Atreyagaurav ♦11 | The bike+pedestrian trail looks to be modified, and now is a smaller loop than in the map. The picture shows the new looking asphalt. via StreetComplete 60.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/255365.jpg GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Atreyagaurav/traces/11711450 |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | jagree ♦28 | The new path (which goes SW across the field) has been mapped now, but all the old paths are still there. it is not clear which sections of the old path still exist and if they have been changed to horse-only. needs verification | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed imagery updated | |
| 5250939 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | --- | Missing bike path connecting sidewalk to the mad river recreation trail on this side of the road |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | no connection can be seen here. | |
| 5285316 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Jonathan Delaney ♦16 | There is a bike lane here but when I try to add it I get an error. Editing in Go Map!!. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | there is a route relation here. you will need to view the entire relation or download in order to cut the line. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Jonathan Delaney ♦16 | Fixed | |
| 5053148 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | void64 ♦73 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Cycle & Foot Path – https://osm.org/way/917620648 via StreetComplete 61.3: These two paths are side by side and separated by a curb. The bike path is asphalt and the foot path is concrete. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/316430.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 4983721 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | pesticides ♦177 | No bike lane or shoulder on many parts of Lowell Snohomish River Road. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | yes this is true | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | the tag provides for bikes designated. or sharrows | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 5288421 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | MarioXXX ♦19 | Unable to answer "What type of bicycle parking is this?" – Bicycle Parking – https://osm.org/node/12638817373 via StreetComplete 63.1: I don't see this kind of bike stand listed Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/344058.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5304019 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | AhYesGoodTitle ♦5 | "the original train track was removed in 2014. it is currently empty, but there are plans to turn it into a trail" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-03T01:52:52Z POI has no name POI types: railway-level_crossing #organicmaps ios 2026.05.12-1-ios |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | it is appropriately tagged | |
| 5311863 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Smushem ♦5 | Unable to answer "What surface does this road have?" – Service Road – https://osm.org/way/5349828 via StreetComplete 63.1: No road there |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | set to abandoned | |
| 5308694 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | This is not a trail. It’s a trespass path through a privacy buffer. To access Sisters Trail System and conservation area, use entry at end of Wagon Wheel, 44.30584° N, 121.57369° W |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦16,143 | already tagged as private | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | reopened | BeeGirl | ||
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | BeeGirl | Should be removed. This is not a trail | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | reopened | BeeGirl | ||
| 6 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | BeeGirl | Path should be removed. This is not a trail. Buffer provides visual and audible privacy for properties along it. | |
| 7 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | interesting. a change set here removed a version of it https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181434106 and then was added back a few days later https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181458347 | |
| 8 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Strava shows a strong response for this trail and why ICT_maps has only set it to private. | |
| 9 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | MassCartog ♦10 | User may not think it's a trail, and it may indeed be trespass. But heatmap data shows strong usage it either way. It's a strong bright line, not a mess of trails across a field. The aerial imagery in OSM Is not great there but even in some of the blurry photos you can see the trail visible on the ground. Its seems to be correctly mapped and tagged. | |
| 10 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | dannmer ♦23,381 | updated path to match heat map, nothing left to do here. Resolving note | |
| 5305273 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | Parks Residence |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | not map-able. need address or other information | |
| 5309994 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | twomagi ♦1,187 | Mill Park Community Garden via StreetComplete 63.1 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | nothing to add or fix here | |
| 5309856 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Smushem ♦5 | Bead Drive no longer connects to I-97 via StreetComplete 63.1 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | it is correct. | |
| 5308682 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | LabMonkey ♦2 | Node in trail. South of this is asphalt, north is compacted gravel via StreetComplete 63.1 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | looks like it is part of the golf cart road | |
| 5305252 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | mushymapper ♦2 | The road from here North is Ian Ave not East Stanford Avenue |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | "Ian Ave" needs to be "Ian Avenue" and "East Stanford Avenue" is overlapping the existing road. needs to be one line. In ID editor use the 'x' key or right click and cut the line at or near East Chinook Road. Then change the name rather than adding a new line. remove the duplicate line. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | mushymapper ♦2 | "Ave" has been changed to "Avenue" overlapping line removed. Thanks for the pointers! | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | mushymapper ♦2 | ||
| 5310435 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Carnildo ♦280 | Pit toilet via StreetComplete 63.1 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 3 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | maxwellward ♦2,979 | ||
| 5188228 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | --- | There is a pit toilet at the trailhead now. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5310436 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Carnildo ♦280 | Address 25573 via StreetComplete 63.1 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | what has the address? 1 the toilet 2 the parking area 3 the info-baord 4 the trailhead | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Carnildo ♦280 | I'm not sure. A number of places that didn't previously have address markers now do; this one is a standalone marker near the toilet. I think the fire district is making a push to assign addresses to places they might need to refer to. | |
| 5310382 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦205 | Per another editor, this bridge is out. Add back once the bridge has been replaced. See https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://elkhornmediagroup.com/umatilla-county-commissioners-to-vote-on-approving-bridge-replacement/&ved=2ahUKEwj6ot2k69WUAxU9LDQIHTp4OsEQFnoECCcQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2VeoI1yQvR4tjbLk2jPFX4 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | best to set to construction | |
| 5310481 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | There is no entrance from Spencer Creek. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Looks to be correct | |
| 5310350 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | BHSPitMonkey ♦79 | Unable to answer "What’s the name of this street?" – Residential Road – https://osm.org/way/127123414 via StreetComplete_ee 63.1: Fenced off. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5311369 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | tea8 ♦4 | "Leitram Street not court" OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-03T01:52:52Z POI has no name POI types: building #organicmaps ios 2026.05.12-1-ios |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Mapillary shows the street signs as Leitram Avenue on the north end (2018) and Leitram Street on the south end. (2019) | |
| 3 | ~ 9 days ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦16,143 | updated to street based on the observation from 2026 | |
| 5311391 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | post office |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | post office is already marked near by. no imagery shows a building in this green lot. | |
| 5306899 Category: EveryDoor | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Omnific ♦2,268 | Amenity described as "private road" with name "private road". #EveryDoor |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | duplicate note | |
| 5306900 Category: EveryDoor | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Omnific ♦2,268 | Amenity described as "private road" with name "private road". #EveryDoor |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | yes this one is behind a gate | |
| 5306898 Category: EveryDoor | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Omnific ♦2,268 | Amenity described as "private road" with name "All are Private Roads Back Here". #EveryDoor |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | do they have no trespassing signs on them? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | as these still look like county owned roads. we could set these to access=destination but are not likely privately owned. and not access=private | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Omnific ♦2,268 | Agreed, added | |
| 5306999 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | bb010g ♦18 | In context of overlay "Buildings" – Building – https://osm.org/way/1430106260 via StreetComplete_ee 63.1: I'm pretty sure this is a car in the satellite imagery. I found no building during survey. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | seams except able from other imagery | |
| 5306932 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | wislander ♦467 | Unable to answer "How many car lanes does this road have?" – Northeast Manitou Beach Drive (Tertiary Road) – https://osm.org/way/1520242472 via StreetComplete 63.1: This segment is two way, 1 lane each direction |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | it has two lanes. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | where does the one way start and end? | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | wislander ♦467 | I guess I was too hasty with my comment: I had already split the way where it needed to be split and just wasn't able to edit the one-way tag in StreetComplete. I've fixed it now. | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | wislander ♦467 | ||
| 5298028 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | lioracle | Current biking directions allow possibility of left turn from SW manning onto SW admiral. This is not a possible or safe turn on a bike. It's like taking a left across a multilane highway. Indicate that this left turn not be allowed in bicycle directions. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | "directions" is a router problem. What app are you using? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | The bike route relation on the way follows the City of Seattle's bike data set. https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/projects-and-programs/programs/bike-program/bike-web-map | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | To be clear the only thing we could do OSM wise is to remove the route relation. this would trigger routers to not use it as an "ideal" bike route. It may be added again as the city looks to indicate it as a bike route. Not that I agree with the way "bike routes" are done in the city. | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | lioracle | I’m using Komoot. Which not only routes this way but highlights it as a preferred bike route (in blue). | |
| 6 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | yes it is highlighted due to the route relation in open street map. | |
| 7 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | 1. Thanks for bringing this up, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lioracle! 2. As a biker I'd probably do a two-step left here (straight to far corner, loop on the sidewalk, wait for the light and straight again, essentially just using the crosswalks--just like a left turn box). Is there a reason that wouldn't work here? 3. I agree, this intersection and official recommended route is not ideal. Consider reaching out to SDOT to get a left-turn box actually painted or something? 4. Maybe we could do something funky with something like hazard=*, but that feels very much like tagging for the router. 5. We map what's "on the ground," avoiding editorial choices where possible. I don't think it would be appropriate to modify the relation from what's officially marked on the SDOT map and/or on-site signage. 6. If there's an obviously better route, then definitely contact SDOT to get it changed on their map. | |
| 8 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | lioracle | No there’s no light here or crosswalk. It is a left turn from a side street across both directions of basically highway speed traffic. There is an obviously better route: 30th Ave SW to SW city view street. | |
| 9 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | mmm, that's not good. I haven't biked this intersection from that exact direction before-- would you basically follow Avalon north a little more and turn left on Spokane (or bump up onto the little bit of Alki trail and use the crosswalk to Spokane), which turns into 30th? I think it would be good to pester SDOT about this; I think their map is wrong. I'll keep this in mind to investigate sometime and see if I agree with your assessment of this intersection, in which case I'll join you in bothering SDOT until they at least update their official route map | |
| 10 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Are there bike route signs here? if there are no bike route signs we can remove the bike route relation. EG Mapping what is on the ground. | |
| 11 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | lioracle | It would be worth someone going and checking but I don’t think there were any bike route signs here | |
| 12 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | looks like the down hill is signed. Can't find anything for the uphill in imagery, before or at the intersection. I added the bike route markers signs I could find. | |
| 13 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | lioracle | The route makes plenty of sense going in the opposite (downhill) direction (where it would be a right turn onto the side street). So that route relation shouldn’t be removed. But in the uphill (nw) direction it is wrong/dangerous/should be removed. | |
| 14 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | yes it does make sense and unfortunately we don't directly control the bike routes in the city in an open source way. | |
| 15 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | as no sins direct you up this hill as a "bike route" and the left turn is not included in the city data I removed the left turn from the relation and set the lower section to allow for down hill only. | |
| 16 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | signs* | |
| 17 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Did you put the better route in for the uphill direction? | |
| 18 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | there is not a better route. | |
| 19 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | lioracle | There is a better route, 30th Ave SW to City View to Admiral. Please mark it. | |
| 20 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | as the better route is not part of the SDOT or City of Seattle's bike routes. I can not add it to the relation. created a different relation. | |
| 21 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | pesticides ♦177 | I tested this out with Komoot. The good news is it routes you up SW City View St when heading west. The bad news is it now routes you _down_ SW City View St when heading east, which isn't a practical maneuver. I added a direction to the relation mentioned in the previous comment to help out the router. Ultimately, there's not much more that can be done without cooperation from either SDOT or Komoot. | |
| 5304038 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | These are steps via StreetComplete_ee 63.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/346069.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5304041 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | "direction=E" OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-03T01:52:52Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-bench #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-4-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5304042 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | N/S footpath between the buildings #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-4-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5304046 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | "direction=N, and is just south of the missing footpath." OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-03T01:52:52Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-bench #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-4-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5304045 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | Foot path continues to the west to meet the other foot path. Needs wheelchair=no due to steps. #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-4-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I added the steps | |
| 5304044 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | "direction=S" OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-03T01:52:52Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-bench #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-4-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5304043 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | "direction=S" OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-03T01:52:52Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-bench #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-4-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5304031 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | "capacity=3" OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-03T01:52:52Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-bicycle_parking #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-4-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5304029 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | Walkway on the north side of the buildings, with frequent steps. wheelchair=no. via StreetComplete_ee 63.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/346065.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | ||
| 5304055 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | Unable to answer "Does this crosswalk have tactile paving on both ends?" – Marked Crossing – https://osm.org/node/13597365230 via StreetComplete_ee 63.1: Do half-divided roads count is a crossing island? Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/346070.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/346071.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | nope | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Anonymous897234 ♦543 | Ok. Thanks for your various updates. | |
| 5303813 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Dpark12300 ♦2 | "Just a rock and the fire hydrant on this triangle area. " The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-03T01:52:52Z POI has no name POI types: tourism-information-board #organicmaps ios 2026.05.12-1-ios |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | is the info board some where else near by? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Dpark12300 ♦2 | There’s no info board matching a “tourism information board” | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Lumikeiju ♦579 | Removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8155579165 as part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183417739. | |
| 5303233 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | bobthebuilder423468 ♦175 | what the flip is going on here with all these adresses |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | looks like there are multiple buildings here. just not all on this one building. don't know if there are multiple lots or one lot. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | bobthebuilder423468 ♦175 | true | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,519 | The addresses were imported from an older version of a government data set. Some of them have since been removed from it. I've deleted them, added a couple buildings, and moved the remaining addresses to the correct lots, which you can see on portlandmaps.com | |
| 5303830 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | officeboy ♦1 | Unable to answer "Does this crosswalk have tactile paving on both ends?" – Unmarked Crossing – https://osm.org/node/7668588357 via StreetComplete 63.1: It's a sidewalk not a crossing |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | does it have the lowered curbs on either side of this driveway? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | All the driveways here have crosswalk labeled | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | officeboy ♦1 | It's a slight dip in the continuous concrete sidewalk and then the road side has a longer gentle slope to the road. | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | But no tactile paving, so I think "no" is the accurate answer to the quest. There was some discussion about how to tag driveway-footway crossings recently, but as long as they're tagged currently I think it's fine to leave this as is and add tactile_paving=no to the crossing node. | |
| 6 | ~ 28 days ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦16,143 | looking at streetside here, it's appropriately tagged | |
| 5299213 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Random Ouk ♦3 | "I have tried to find a suitable category for this place. It is a place to do paintball shooting. It is more of an activity spot for leisure purposes. I placed it under attraction which might not be the best category. So you may slot it into another category that seems fitting." OSM snapshot date: 2026-04-04T03:36:32Z POI name: Millionaire Paintball POI types: tourism-attraction #organicmaps android 2026.04.07-12-Google |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | if you know the actual area. landuse=recreational_grounds | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | landuse=recreation_ground | |
| 4 | ~ 22 days ago | closed | QuigleyJones ♦3,311 | ||
| 5302145 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | I believe the name of this road is "Pierce Rd." not "Peters Rd." |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Tiger Data says it is Peters Road | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Lumikeiju ♦579 | Confirmed via Bing Streetside street-level imagery that this is signed as "Peters Road" at its intersection with Sunnyside Road. Added "name:signed=yes" tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185060440 - closing note. | |
| 5301903 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | The road bends here significantly. We probably should show it somehow. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | okay, #fixed ? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Trod Skunk ♦24 | ||
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | reopened | Trod Skunk ♦24 | ||
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Trod Skunk ♦24 | Maybe? https://flic.kr/p/2sbC1Xh | |
| 6 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦54,407 | Looks pretty accurate to me! | |
| 5301009 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Boarded up, partially demolished via StreetComplete 63.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/345799.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | does not look like a total demolition. TStrand and framing materials in front. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Sounds correct based on what I saw, too | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | Unsure if there are any tagging changes we can make at this time. | |
| 5302395 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | Access to 26537 SE 224th St is down driveway for 26601, not the driveway for 26637/26620 to the east. The map here shows the 26601 driveway ending but it continues south to 26537 (see GoogleMaps) |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Can't use Google Maps as a source | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed the driveway from the other note | |
| 5302397 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | No access to 26537 from 265th Ave SE. Access is down private driveway just west of 26601 SE 224th St |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | not sure what this is asking for. #fixed the driveway to this point using the USGS 3D. looks like the users router is navigating to the closest road. driveway is access=private | |
| 5302408 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Shelvacu ♦52 | Unable to answer "How is this power line attached?" – Seattle City Light [1318998] (Power Pole) – https://osm.org/node/11950750572 via StreetComplete 63.1: both Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/345933.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | pin no matter the orientation this is still a pin connector. | |
| 5302406 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Shelvacu ♦52 | Unable to answer "How is this power line attached?" – Seattle City Light [1324736] (Power Pole) – https://osm.org/node/11965385361 via StreetComplete 63.1: it's both, no way to mark that in streetcomplete Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/345930.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | also pin | |
| 5302407 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Shelvacu ♦52 | Unable to answer "How is this power line attached?" – Seattle City Light [1324701] (Power Pole) – https://osm.org/node/11950740156 via StreetComplete 63.1: both horizontal and vertical, also there's two poles Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/345931.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/345932.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | this is pin. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Shelvacu ♦52 | Could you explain more? Reading through https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:line_attachment it seems like it should be (pin|pin|pin)|(anchor|anchor|anchor) and then a bunch more layers for all the utility wires | |
| 5033493 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | hdevine825 ♦713 | Unable to answer "What kind of building is this?" – Building – https://osm.org/way/220805380 via StreetComplete 61.3: Shelter with bike parking. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | added bike parking covered | |
| 5300648 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lawlegagger ♦1 | Spotted 2 flock cameras on power pole facing both directions of Elder Avenue next to park & railroad tracks |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | looks like you have added them | |
| 5173986 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | HmmEmojidotPNG ♦1 | Unable to answer "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road without a sidewalk here?" – State Route 20 [WA 20] (Trunk Road) – https://osm.org/way/303269538 via StreetComplete 62.2: Enough space to park a car. Cars go very fast |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | Glassman ♦1,022 | Select one of the bike background layers, for example CycleMap which shows US Route 10 going parallel to HWY 29 as well as using it for a short distance. That doesn't exactly answer your questions but it does indicate that the planners wanted to keep bikes off of sections of 20. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | they are not forbidden here. not that you would want to walk this section. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5157141 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | seascorpio82 ♦24 | Unable to answer "What’s the name of this place?" – Bus Station / Terminal – https://osm.org/way/1298660119 via StreetComplete 62.2: This is a bus turnaround and parking for buses using S Bellevue Station |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | this seams like it could be better tagged | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | jhi0f9q2t ♦17 | South Bellevue Transit Station | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | this is a bus holding area within | |
| 5 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,034 | eh, amenity=parking with access tags? Not quite that, but I don't know which tags would be more correct. I bet there are some though. | |
| 6 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | seams logical and better than bus station | |
| 7 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5285498 Category: EveryDoor | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | MarioXXX ♦19 | Amenity described as "propane fuel supply" with name "". #EveryDoor |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | there is no node here. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | note provided from old data, maybe a year old. | |
| 4940101 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | TriStuffMiniFriend ♦36 | Standing in this parking lot, there is no visible rail road tracks at least as far as the alley to the west or down the back of the building to the east. It would probably be good to disconnect the tracks here. Not sure how to do that. |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | there are still "right of way signs" in the imagery. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | changed to razed. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5297598 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | partytax ♦2,229 | #surveyme consider deleting more of this abandoned railway I only deleted the part along Rehoboth Avenue that I am certain there's no remnant of |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I made changes in line with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Railroads#Life_Cycle | |
| 5264195 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | weblogdryads ♦2,763 | railway doesnt exist |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | I-76 ♦3,422 | It once did...don't go down the rabbit hole of being angry about abandoned railroads being mapped, some people find joy in mapping such things... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | reopened | gpserror ♦12,108 | except abandoned means you can see a trace of it on the ground making it obvious that there once were trains going through. At most I'd mark it as railway=razed instead. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I agree gpserror I removed the sections I would deem obliterated per or on the cusp https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Railroads#Life_Cycle | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5289790 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | leopardweasel ♦12 | I believe this rail bridge has been removed. I am not sure but I believe the line ends on the east side of Travis Street. #OsmAnd |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Set as razed. Imagery confirms it's removal. | |
| 5298153 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | eleehall | "real name is Hall Lane" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-04-04T03:36:32Z POI name: Eagle Rock Drive POI types: hwtag-private highway-service #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-1-Google |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed | |
| 5298157 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | eleehall | "actually name is Hall Lane" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-03T01:52:52Z POI name: Eagle Rock Drive POI types: hwtag-private highway-service #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-1-Google |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed Got this one will fix the other one now. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | whoops did not close this one. | |
| 5298155 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | eleehall | "hall lane. eagle rock begins at south fork of road" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-04-04T03:36:32Z POI name: Eagle Rock Drive POI types: psurface-unpaved_good highway-residential #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-1-Google |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Can you explain this better? Is this Hall Lane? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | I hope I got this fixed. may take a week or more to show up in organic maps. check on openstreetmap.org | |
| 5298154 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | eleehall | "private with no name" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-04-04T03:36:32Z POI name: Hall Lane POI types: psurface-unpaved_good highway-residential #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-1-Google |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | Tiger Data Eg the USGS census data set has this road labeled as Hall Lane. we have access to 2020, 20021, 2022, and 2023. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,076 | #fixed got to your other note | |
| 5298156 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | eleehall | "this is not Hall lane Just a private drive. I know as I am ed hall" OSM snapshot date: 2026-04-04T03:36:32Z POI has no name POI types: psurface-unpaved_good hwtag-private highway-service #organicmaps android 2026.05.08-1-Google |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,076 | road has no name here and that is okay. moved driveway to correct location. do you want me to set access=private? you are welcome to sign in with this user on openstreetmap.org and fix anything I am changing in the ID editor. |