| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4901422 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Outdated buildings; 8232 on alley |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | jhaluska80 ♦3,264 | I updated the buildings, but is this note over 8232? I would think it would be beside 8238 or 8230. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | I didn’t see the new building in King County 2023 aerial imagery, but it’s possible I was off by a lot. | |
| 4 | ~ 18 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 5274678 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Lot redeveloped |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,393 | can't tell if this is a bunch of row houses or SFHs but marked old building here as demolished. | |
| 3 | ~ 22 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 5274676 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Lot redeveloped |
| 2 | ~ 22 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 5274677 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Lot redeveloped |
| 2 | ~ 22 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 5274675 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Lot redeveloped |
| 2 | ~ 22 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 5292027 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 26 days ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Do these volleyball courts actually exist? |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | commented | weblogdryads ♦2,137 | you can see the poles for the nets on aerial imagery | |
| 3 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Ah, thanks! | |
| 5269145 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Lot redeveloped |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | gpserror ♦12,393 | not sure what I'm seeing here but made some edits to more closely match what I see in newer satellite imagery. Is this a bunch of tiny homes now? Road access to back row? Are all same address now? What is up with access to 8323 15th Ave NW? | |
| 3 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 5274674 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Lot redeveloped |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 2854346 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | Wim L ♦531 | The sign on this house says 7525 (not 7523) via StreetComplete 34.1 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | commented | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | King County’s records show both addresses here. Maybe 7523 just isn’t visible from the street? | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | pesticides ♦125 | King County records no longer show 7523 here. If you search the 7523 address on the USPS ZIP Code lookup most of the fields in the result are blank, unlike nearby addresses. Additionally, there are no search results for "7523 14th Ave NW" on a variety of search engines, while other nearby addresses bring up real estate listings. I suspect 7523 doesn't exist, and maybe never did. | |
| 4 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 5274672 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Lot redeveloped |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 5274586 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Lot redeveloped |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | weblogdryads ♦2,137 | fixed buildings, addresses need to be fixed though | |
| 3 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 5274587 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Lot redeveloped |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | weblogdryads ♦2,137 | can’t see it on imagery | |
| 3 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 5274585 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Lot redeveloped |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | weblogdryads ♦2,137 | cant see on imagery yet. Ersi gives a sneak-peak | |
| 3 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 5274670 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Lot redeveloped |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 4975393 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | tannewt ♦38 | New house here with b unit via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/306683.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | Added address node, but keeping this open because the photo will be helpful when aerial images come out showing the new house's area. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | we can add the image link to the building tag. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | Not for StreetComplete images: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#Are_the_pictures_taken_with_StreetComplete_permanent? I think it's mainly the alignment of the houses in comparison with the roof that made me say it would be helpful when tracing the split houses. | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | thanks I needed that. | |
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | 2025 King County aerial shows the new buildings. | |
| 7 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Updated | |
| 5292029 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 26 days ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Is this really in a parking spot? How is it mounted? |
| 2 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | on the pole | |
| 3 | ~ 21 days ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦722 | Moved and added support=pole. Thanks! | |
| 5274588 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Lot redeveloped |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | weblogdryads ♦2,137 | updated | |
| 5266377 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | This corner has been redeveloped and features a historic installation of a rail car. Not sure what the site’s function is. |
| 5246137 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | As mapped this loop is implausibly wiggly. Survey or find unobstructed imagery to refine the geometry. Note that legally this is not a roundabout but a four-way stop with fountain at the center. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦11,454 | 2020 orthoimagery shows it well... I dinked around with it and then decided it should be mapped as normal divided streets here more or less. I'll try to tackle that soon if someone else doesn't. | |
| 3 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | mostly this is not a roundabout. it is a four way stop with a thing in the middle. | |
| 4 | ~ 23 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141307223/history | |
| 5 | ~ 21 days ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | Oh boy, circle intersection identification. This one is a tiny big ambiguous because of the stop signs on the way in, but I think making the circle circular and setting junction=circular would probably be most accurate? There's lots of material on the wiki; see some photos at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout | |
| 6 | ~ 21 days ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | I went ahead and updated this to that. Please disagree & discuss. Or close the note if you think this is correct. Thanks! | |
| 7 | ~ 21 days ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | or I guess it could be something like a traffic_calming thing in the middle of a highway=stop stop=all... | |
| 8 | ~ 11 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | Set it to traffic calming island in the middle of a standard junction as no one-way signs present. | |
| 9 | ~ 11 days ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | Is it a highway=stop stop=all though, instead of several minor stops? | |
| 10 | ~ 9 days ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | yes it is stop=all | |
| 5246066 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Lot redeveloped |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | Is it currently under construction? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | Appears that a new set of two or four townhouses are complete here. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦722 | Updated geometry and set building=terrace. Let me know if that's not correct. | |
| 5245946 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | This lobe of the building is raised one level off of the ground on columns and the driveway passes underneath. The entrance to Miniatures & More is under it, via the driveway. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦722 | Looks like this was added. | |
| 4917421 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Posted notice to cyclists |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | dannmer ♦18,950 | Unclear note, can you provide a clear, detailed description of what needs to be done here | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | On the highway westbound is a traffic sign instructing cyclists to read the upcoming notice, and then at the following turnout is a second sign with longer text that is unreadable at motor vehicle speeds. That sign needs surveying. | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Omnific ♦2,138 | Concur, there's something there from my last visit. | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | how do you want this to be mapped? | |
| 6 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Depends on what it says | |
| 7 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | how do I add a beg button for flashing lights? | |
| 8 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | dannmer ♦18,950 | added info board with a fixme | |
| 9 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | the one up the road at the beg button reads "BICYCLISTS READ NOTICE push button to activate or reactivate warning lights. Limited shoulders and visibility for next 11 miles. Please use pullouts and allow traffic to pass when fever possible. flashing lights will last for one hour (12 MPH)" | |
| 10 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | added the info board where the beg button is. will add the one on the other end of crescent lake later | |
| 11 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | there is another one of these signs on SR112 | |
| 5234071 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Signed “Euclid Road” |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦11,454 | the sign always wins | |
| 5214165 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | “Darkpour Cafe” <https://www.darkpour.com/> is colocated with Bliss Ice Cream; the same counter serves as both businesses. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Omnific ♦2,138 | Added | |
| 2796129 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Verify survey point named “Cool Guy Park” |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦53,346 | Looks like it was removed. Closing note. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | reopened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | ||
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2429251658 | |
| 5 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦969 | not in the list of Seattle parks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_parks_in_Seattle | |
| 6 | ~ 6 months ago | reopened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | ||
| 7 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Node is still there. And it’s claiming to be a survey point, not necessarily a park. | |
| 8 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦722 | Node was removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175781366. | |
| 4937969 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Is this really “Discovery Park Boulevard”? It looks like just an ordinary turning circle to me. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | Well this area is either Utah Street or Discovery Park Boulevard (probably the latter because this looks like the terminus of some zone of the road network). I think the real question is whether this loop is its own (separate) road or not. Is this the correct way to represent a turning circle with no median, or is there some node tagging that should be used instead? | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Ah, yes initially I’d only meant to question whether way 374888419 is really a distinct street or whether it should be simply a highway=turning_circle node on way 1192022358. I see now there is also some discrepancy around the name of way 1192022358 etc. We currently have a mix of “Utah Street” and “Discovery Park Boulevard” that I find implausible. King County GIS shows only “Utah Street” in this area, and in fact has no instances of “Discovery Park Boulevard” anywhere. Maybe it was recently changed? I’ll go back and verify the street names in person and then plan to convert way 374888419 to a turning circle. | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | Huh. Looks like some segments were renamed by a now-deleted user in 2019? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70864356 Happy mapping! | |
| 5 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Confirmed that this is just a turning circle and updated. Way 314652748 has no name on the ground but its current tagging as part of Discovery Park Boulevard sounds reasonable to me. Way 989834651 through 159547074 are signed as Discovery Park Boulevard. | |
| 4927721 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Construction complete. Extension of parking lot. |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chpwssn ♦2 | I surveyed and added the parking lot addition | |
| 4910634 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | There is no external door on this wall. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | Lumikeiju ♦443 | Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170685385 - thanks! Closing note. | |
| 4901424 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Second story is residential. Signed 1514. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦722 | Retagged this garage as a residential building with house number 1514. Let me know if that doesn't sound right. | |
| 4901387 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Unmapped new buildings; 8116, 8118 visible from alley. |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | is it under the tree or is the tree gone? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | BHSPitMonkey ♦68 | I think I was able to get these via newer aerials and some good Mapillary imagery. The units in question are slightly to the north of the note marker. 8118 is the detached ADU and 8116 now stretches from street to alley with a separate entrance (the one facing Stone is now marked 8116 B). | |
| 4895490 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Does this trail still exist? I didn’t see it from the PCT. |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | dannmer ♦18,950 | There is zero Strava heat map activity at the note locationwhich would indicate that the trail has been abandoned given the high level of heat map activity on the PCT. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦969 | set to abandoned | |
| 4884549 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Starbucks closed with sign: “We are temporarily closing […] Please visit us at our new location in mid-September. Little Rock & Kingswood” |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | Hypsometric ♦4,452 | Is "Little Rock & Kingswood” going to be the new location? | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | any updates to this note? | |
| 3787471 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Locate “Made in USA” sculpture |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | Did not see on ride-by recently; do you know what type of sculpture this is? | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | I made this note when looking for an OSM object to link with https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q28453397. Reading more now, the Wikipedia article says it’s a “steel archway as well as a plaza with seating areas”. Not sure how best to map that, but a point in the middle should be fine. Would be nice if we could verify by observing e.g. a plaque at the site somewhere. | |
| 4 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦722 | OSM node is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12100097673, added last year. I'm not familiar with referencing osm objects back from the wikidata, but the object already links to that wikidata. Thanks! | |
| 4852207 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Various unmapped parking along road loop |
| 4480635 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Where is Kiix̣in? - https://kiixin.ca/ - https://parks.canada.ca/culture/designation/lieu-site/kiixin |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | QuigleyJones ♦3,115 | right about here yes | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | ||
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | Andrew Kvalheim ♦209 | Thanks. I don’t see it on the map yet. Do we have a usable source of that information? |