Note Activities of bpaz709394

Note	#	⏱️ Last updated	Event	Contributor	Comment
5115498 Category: Unknown	1	~ 9 months ago	opened	bpaz709394	您好: 在這地圖中所有顯示註記的Ｘ點.都不是我的. 煩請貴公司代為清隊. 謝謝
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	Please turn off "map notes" on the right from "Layers"
861105	1	~ 9 years ago	opened	Battlealvin2009	There should be a footway in this area.
	2	~ 1 year ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Correct, feature exists IRL.
	3	~ 1 year ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	May you clarify how this footway is aligned? eg connects Stadium Path to somewhere else?
	4	~ 1 year ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Sorry for the uninformative comment earlier - honestly I'm not sure either, there's a very twisty and turny stair starting from the south-west end of Stadium Path, and most of it is behind a locked gate (slope maintenance path iirc), making it harder to survey. Also I'm pretty sure there's a whole unmapped footway network in this area that's much more extensive than the one I was talking about. Another factor is that I was simply tired on the day I surveyed this and didn't want to climb steps. Re-survey recommended.
	5	~ 1 year ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Well understandable; if it's a slope maintenance path, might as well pretend it doesn't exist at the moment. It wouldn't affect general map usage.
	6	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	7	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	8	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
5037709 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	kingkingHK ♦524	Has this construction https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507734827 been finished? The only source seem to be https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2327347 , a note from five years ago. Aerial imagery also does not seem to show any signs of construction.
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Alternatively, there is a chance the construction was quick and was completed while we were not looking. Aerial images are not clear enough to determine whether the rebuilding took place.
	6	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Yes, that's why I made this note so that someone in the future can check the current state when they pass by.
	7	~ 7 months ago	closed	dewbhudhew	11
	8	~ 7 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	9	~ 7 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
5083727 Category: Unknown	1	~ 10 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505913501 has descriptive name.
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	@bpaz709394 you have been reported to the DWG. Justice be served.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	6	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	7	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	8	~ 9 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176775441 ; closing.
5034379 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Family Medicine Clinic
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176775943 ; closing.
1036042	1	~ 9 years ago	opened	Richy_B	"The path from 'Lai Tak Tsuen' to 'viewpoint' is impassable and dangerous. Please remove it from the map" POI has no name POI types: landuse-forest OSM data version: 2017-05-11T13:22:09Z #mapsme
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	A view point exists near Lai Tak Tsuen as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1844899403 but this is extremely confusing and suspicious; I feel bad about closing it without survey.
	6	~ 8 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	The only path that matches the description would be https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104107657 . At least it is easier to survey there.
	7	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5155801 for convenience
	8	~ 7 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	This note is already adequately handled with https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5155801 with a better location; any objections to closing this note and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5115204 ?
	9	~ 7 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	me no objections. The other guy is probably here for the procedure and will likely not respond.
	10	~ 7 months ago	closed	kingkingHK ♦524	Yeah, the DWG guy is probably comment for formalities only. I don't expect anyone else to see this note. Thus, closing.
4025846	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	盛水式加水機 2部 [飲用水] 洗手間下一層
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 7 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Correct
	6	~ 2 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	In OSM we trust. In practice there could be multiple fountains at the same location (expecting many people? wheelchair compatibility?), but to indicate that we have a fountain here, one fountain would be enough. People would clarify it when they pass by.
	7	~ 2 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186921482 ; closing.
4015897	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Ian Ho ♦33	The pylons are under the project "Removal of 132kV Overhead Line and Pylons for P-Line". Project started 2022. Total 24 pylons will be removed.
	2	~ 2 years ago	commented	HighlandPaddyHK ♦1	Confirmed, I went to visit Osborn's Cairn and the pylon was gone!
	3	~ 1 year ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	I guess this means the towers are now physically gone? Will need to update OSM data to reflect this (eg there is still a tower area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785 )
	4	~ 1 year ago	commented	Ian Ho ♦33	When I add the notes, the removal project was still work in progress. Some of the pylons were not removed yet. I did visit 1 or 2 removed pylon sites. Only the base concrete structure (no more than 1 meter high) remains after removal. So I think when the project is complete, we can update OSM.
	5	~ 11 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Also see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4015896 It seems the towers are now gone?
	6	~ 11 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173778439 But I guess can still verify if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785 exists?
	7	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	8	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	9	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	10	~ 7 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	By survey, the quoted way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785 no longer exists, and there are nothing remaining other than the concrete bases.
	11	~ 4 months ago	closed	kingkingHK ♦524	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183398143 ; closing.
939664	1	~ 9 years ago	opened	Koala888	(可能)日軍手掘洞 (OSM data version: 2017-03-06T16:48:02Z) #mapsme
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Perhaps this is referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11245354726 , which is not located here.
	6	~ 8 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Well, looking at nearby features, it seems like there are quite a lot of Japanese caves in this area. It is not unlikely to really have an unmapped one here.
	7	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	It is extremely unnatural to have multiple notes in different time frames share the exact same coordinates. One probable cause is the GPS collapsing everyone onto the same coordinates due to poor signals. I don't trust the locations of these (3) notes. Apart from the water stream note which can be armchaired, this could easily become an area search in the mountains for something which may not exist.
	8	~ 8 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	My guess: Notice that all three notes are made with maps.me, and one of them mentions "poi: landuse-forest". Using overpass to look at the osm data at the time, we see that the forest is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4508992 , and the location of the three notes is roughly at the centre of the forest. My guess is that when maps.me creates a note for way, it puts it in the centre of it, resulting in this situation. Anyway, agreed that the location is not trustable. See the other two notes by the same user: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/949531 https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/944066
	9	~ 6 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	By now, I/we have seen enough cases of maps.me placing notes at centroids of large polygons that this note can be safely assumed to be the same. A note without a (correct) location is practically unactionable; @vectorial8192 do you support closing this note?
	10	~ 6 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Yeah, let's close this. Above mentioned, we can locate several features nearby (albeit kinda far away) which matches the description of this note. If future guys discover something new then they can add note (or even do OSM edit directly).
	11	~ 6 months ago	closed	kingkingHK ♦524	Then, closing.
3055825	1	~ 4 years ago	opened	---	Start of this path is full of thorns and dense vegetation.
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
1655004	1	~ 7 years ago	opened	This Is A Display Name Desu ♦14	check and map all stairs and other paths accessible along the way, including those that are not open to general public
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
5034376 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Family Medicine Clinic
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
5080646 Category: Unknown	1	~ 10 months ago	opened	kingkingHK ♦524	Is Lantau Link Visitors Centre (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12271148) really a `highway=rest_area`?
	2	~ 10 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Hong Kong does not have rest areas. At most this is a park.
	3	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	But then, the park already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158307216, the relation merely includes it and the parking nearby (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903452942). Maybe that means the relation is useless?
	4	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	5	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	6	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	7	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Not entirely useless. Using the American interpretation, a feature must have its "main building" plus its car park. Here, both sub-components are separated by the highway. I can see the mappers decided to use separate polygons to establish each component, then use a multipolygon (in OSM this would be a relation) to join them and describe the full feature. The logic is sound. It seems there is nothing to do here.
	8	~ 8 months ago	closed	kingkingHK ♦524	After consulting the international osm Discord server ( https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/428214296695144458/1453748562541154472 ), it seems like this can be considered a rest area. Then, really nothing to do here. Closing.
4978548 Category: Unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	seewhyso ♦189	the bridge area got divided up into various pieces as to differentiate opening dates and features. this made the rendering of name is quite clumsy over here. could we try and hide some of the names?
	2	~ 1 year ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	This is more of a renderer discussion rather than an osm one, isn't it?
	3	~ 1 year ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	For implementation, there's `bridge:part=` proposed long ago without much attention, only mass added to a hundred. The fundamental conceptual problem here is how to define a `man_made=bridge` for twin , long, and multi-stage `bridge=viaduct` , as the eastbound on the west is new far apart, and longer span.
	4	~ 1 year ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	(`bridge:part=` is not a good format either, as `bridge=` isn't a feature, unlike `building=` )
	5	~ 1 year ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	3. The `start_date=` is difficult to define. In OHM, the object's existing status is used. In OSM, often the oldest applicable is used.
	6	~ 1 year ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	4. Minor note: I didn't bother to draw the whole IEC western `=viaduct` , so doing this is also a lazy hack
	7	~ 1 year ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	5. `ref=` is another factor that needs to be considered to define a `man_made=bridge` , aside from `name=` and `start_date=` (etc)
	8	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	9	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	10	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	11	~ 4 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	@Kovoschiz does https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181152791 resolve this note?
	12	~ 4 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	No, I didn't do anything on them, only `layer=`
	13	~ 4 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Tbh I don't really understand what this note is asking for / what can be done to resolve this note.
	14	~ 4 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	One way out is to start a discussion at Discord, to confirm the tagging method for individual bridge joint parts. Then, we will know how to tag these, and then apply the new tagging, and then finish. private guess it's probably gonna be many nameless parts linked up with a "IEC highway" relation.
	15	~ 4 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Actually, IEC is the name of the road, not of the bridge, which is nameless. Perhaps we can just remove the `name=`, which solves the "clumsy rendering" issue this note is complaining about, then at the very least this note can be closed.
	16	~ 4 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	That's a good question. But I thought IEC is effectively the de facto naming of the structure at the same time.
	17	~ 4 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Citation needed. If you ask 10 people what "IEC" is 11 of them will think of the road, not the bridge.
	18	~ 4 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	It's effectively identical here though? If I ask what's that bridge, they will still answer IEC.
	19	~ 4 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	I'm thinking of West Kowloon Corridor, where there are Stage II, and Stage III (Stage IV is folded into Stage I Gascoigne Rd Flyover) East Kowloon Corridor was East Kowloon Way translated into "East Kowloon Elevated Road"
	20	~ 4 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	So I didn't think it must have a bridge-related generic suffix. Cf although Fat Kwong St Flyover is gazetted as the street's extension, it's basically carrying Fat Kwong St.
	21	~ 4 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Looking at named `man_made=bridge` in Hong Kong it appears that (almost) all the names are names of the bridge, with a bridge suffix, including bridge names that are not as well known as the road, where if you ask what's that bridge people are likely to answer the road name.
	22	~ 4 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Clarifying names for @kingkingHK Some roads are not gazetted and currently hold descriptive names e.g. "Wuhu Street underpass" but then we can find ancient (government) documents using those names. This doesn't fully fit the OSM "map what can be seen on the ground" principle but we can't dispute the official informal endorsement. Re bridge/road naming: It's the same old "both sides intertwine" theme again. Planning wants a road, gives it to engineering, and then a bridge gets built. The road (logical / conceptual) shares the same name as the bridge / structure (physical), and both sides can't separate. Bridges (or bridge joints) can have refs but obviously refs aren't names.
	23	~ 4 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Or maybe I have misunderstood the bridge joint tagging.
4958371 Category: Unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Quarry Bay station, Exits B1, B2, and B3 are original research.
	2	~ 1 year ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	*also exit B4
	3	~ 1 year ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	These B "subexits" are not signposted irl and do not appear in irl official diagrams. IRL only denotes "B". This is different from East Tsim Sha Tsui Station where the J "subexits" are delegated to be under the management of an external party, currently the manager of Victoria Dockside, and each have their own ref. I can personally attest these J "subexit" refs have been in use for at least 20 years. Evidence for these B "subexit" refs must be presented; otherwise I will delete them.
	4	~ 1 year ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Detected faulty changeset as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/16819169 .
	5	~ 1 year ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	From Discord discussion, it seems like this note is a false positive? If so, perhaps we can close it.
	6	~ 1 year ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	The next step is to check/confirm the railway protection details, and I haven't done that yet.
	7	~ 1 year ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	So, there really are official documents that write down exist B1 to B4, but they are no longer signposted irl. Then, need to determine the proper next step. Should we keep only the B exit or somehow mix in the preexisting B1 - B4 exits with the newly-mapped B exit?
	8	~ 1 year ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Imo if it's no longer signposted irl then I don't see why it should still be kept. Official documents can still be outdated or simply wrong.
	9	~ 10 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Also, `old_ref` can be considered if you really want to keep the B1-B4.
	10	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Would there be any disagreements if I make all of them `ref=B`, change the `=B1` to `=B4` to `old_ref=`, and close this note?
	11	~ 9 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	I don't know the details, but it seems there can only be 1x `ref=B` as specified by the OSM schema.
	12	~ 9 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	It should be acceptable to have multiple `ref=B`
	13	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	14	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	15	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	16	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Upon rethinking, we can do was:ref as if it is lifecycle. Some of us were there when it was still B1 to B4, and some of us (e.g. me) noticed it is now only B.
	17	~ 8 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Finally resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177305619 ; closing. Once again, I apologize for the false allegations stemming from confusion.
5034435 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Family Medicine Clinic
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 2 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187166124 ; closing.
2690777	1	~ 5 years ago	opened	---	懸崖洞
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 8 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	There may be cliffs here, but I don't think there are any "holes" here that could satisfy the description of this note. Meaning is unclear. Therefore, closing.
	6	~ 8 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	7	~ 8 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	I think "hole" is supposed to mean caves? c.f. nearby https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1668864566 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2140236934
	8	~ 7 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	While this information is believable, it will probably be difficult to survey this safely due to the cliffs and the lack of paths, according to government maps.
	9	~ 7 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	I mean... If you really want, you can get a drone to do that for you, but you got a loicense for that maet?
	10	~ 7 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	I would rather just map the cliff and be done with it. Also, legally speaking, this area is located inside a drone no-fly zone, due to the low-air economy regulatory sandbox whatever. Practically speaking, no one would notice, but I am not buying a drone just for this one note.
4137978	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Albert Tam	"練靶場" POI name: 大潭郊野公園（鰂魚涌擴建部份） Tai Tam Country Park (Quarry Bay Extension) POI types: boundary-national_park OSM data version: 2020-02-09T04:19:23Z #mapsme
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	From online sources, this seems to refer to an abandoned police (training) firing range.
	6	~ 7 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Absolutely nothing at the location of this note; this is probably yet another case of maps.me placing notes at centroids of large polygons. It appears that the feature already exists: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7255499200 @vectorial8192 Please take a look and see if you agree that this note is referring to the quoted feature, and close this note if you do.
	7	~ 7 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	OSMCarto just doesn't render it. I also have no real idea where it could be located, so many thanks for spotting it out, both physically (by negation) and digitally. I don't have any data on me about this location so I can't agree to it; but seeing its location matches online textual descriptions, I don't disagree to it. In OSM we trust. Therefore, closing.
2046829	1	~ 6 years ago	opened	Wright One ♦173	此入口已封
	2	~ 5 years ago	closed	Sylvester77
	3	~ 5 years ago	reopened	Sylvester77
	4	~ 1 year ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Another path nearby was marked as inaccessible https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154333345 ; related?
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	6	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	7	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	8	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	While reading feature history, another note was mentioned https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2046828 which has highly similar ID; both notes are likely created almost at the same time, and yet only one of them was resolved.
	9	~ 7 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	By survey, both of them are `access=discouraged` with barriers, but one may still (easily) hop over the barrier, and many still do, as evidenced by the significant vegetation loss along the trail. I will make a changeset soon.
	10	~ 7 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	`=discouraged` , or `=no` ?
	11	~ 7 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	There is a sign by the AFCD: "Protect the Vegeation; Please Stay on Trail; Do not Take Shortcut", which should not carry legal effects. Afaik there's no law prohibiting the creation or use of desire paths.
	12	~ 7 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	It's not prohibited explicitly. But technically it seems damaging plants is illegal.
5034434 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Family Medicine Clinic
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 2 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Interesting usage of "amenity=doctors". Not sure if this was previously mentioned, but should bring to discussion regardless.
	6	~ 2 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187032128 ; closing.
2087499	1	~ 6 years ago	opened	---	Mapping different floors of the station, the depot, the mall, and the residential buildings
	2	~ 6 years ago	commented	This Is A Display Name Desu ♦14	* Indoor mapping tools needed
	3	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	4	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	5	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4015896	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Ian Ho ♦33	The pylons are under the project "Removal of 132kV Overhead Line and Pylons for P-Line". Project started 2022. Total 24 pylons will be removed.
	2	~ 1 year ago	commented	HenryEK ♦42	what change is wanted here then
	3	~ 1 year ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Relevant note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4015897 It seems like the latest state has been somewhat reflected afterhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150035446 etc, I guess still can review the latest state of the towers e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785
	4	~ 11 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Also see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4015897
	5	~ 10 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	I see the pylon nodes are deleted from OSM some time ago.
	6	~ 10 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Yeah, but there are still some left e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785 , would need to check if they still exist to decide the next steps.
	7	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	8	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	9	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	10	~ 4 months ago	closed	kingkingHK ♦524	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183398143 ; closing.
5086249 Category: Unknown	1	~ 10 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	todo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6143117229 descriptive name
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 8 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178142750 ; closing.
4019647	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	閘門，開放時間05:00-21:30
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	4	~ 9 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	temp-close to see what's underneath this note
	5	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	6	~ 9 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	seems no note is underneath this note
	7	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	8	~ 27 days ago	closed	singerpku
	9	~ 27 days ago	reopened	Kovoschiz ♦2,281
4029950	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	2023年11月走過這條路線，由水壩至接近石澳道樓梯一段，這並不是山徑，而是一條有水的石澗。
	2	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Indeed.
	3	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	4	~ 9 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	5	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3679129	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	---	绿景美景
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 8 months ago	closed	Skylark_H_C ♦226	This place has been already added on the map way/904208373
4691592 Category: Organicmaps	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Quoz ♦32	"Double entry." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-01-21T15:15:53Z POI name: Shenzhen Loft Youth Hostel POI types: tourism-hostel #organicmaps android
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 8 months ago	closed	Skylark_H_C ♦226	Resolved in changeset 177687867
4917619 Category: unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	---	坂田/雪象北
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3939657	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	华南物流互通
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3717657	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	11栋
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3717656	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	12栋
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3721308	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	乐梅园82栋
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3721307	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	五羊郡乐梅园78栋
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4134869	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	龙岗-龙华界碑 42 国务院2016
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4597070 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	东环二路13号 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
4597064 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	已入伙 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
3721313	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	乐梅园4栋
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3717655	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	14栋
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3721342	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	韵梅园1号
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3939703	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	本栋也属于世纪春城
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4030273	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	民治办事处综合服务大楼 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
4966117 Category: Unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	---	Shenzhen North Station
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
5071875 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 10 months ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	樟坑村一号路 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3721336	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	思梅园1栋
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3721312	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	乐梅园44号
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4597069 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	坂田派出所 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3939698	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	和成世纪名园
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4597060 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	杨美人行天桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
197201	1	~ 12 years ago	opened	---	禾塘光新村二巷三栋
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3810332	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	---	onosm.org submitted note from a business: Name: ONUOLT COM addr:housenumber=Unit D addr:street=RM#601-605, No. B Building, Bantian International Centre addr:city=Shenzhen addr:postcode=518000 Phone number: +85265800812 Website: http://www.ontolt.com/ Category: Mobile Clinics Description: Bienvenidos a Ontolt.com! Con 10 años de experiencia, somos un destacado fabricante profesional de soluciones GPON ONU/OLT. Nuestros productos de alta calidad y vanguardia tecnológica nos han ganado una sólida reputación en el mercado. Respaldamos a nuestros clientes con un sólido soporte técnico y atención personalizada para garantizar su satisfacción.En Ontolt.com, comprendemos la importancia de una comunicación fluida y confiable. Por eso, nuestras soluciones GPON están diseñadas para brindar una experiencia conectada y eficiente, impulsando el crecimiento de su negocio.Nos enorgullece ser su socio confiable en el mundo de las telecomunicaciones. Nuestro equipo de expertos ingenieros trabaja incansablemente para asegurar la excelencia en cada producto que ofrecemos.Únase a Ontolt.com y descubra cómo nuestras soluciones GPON ONU/OLT pueden transformar su red de comunicación. Estamos aquí para hacer realidad su visión de una conectividad sólida y sin problemas. ¡Contáctenos hoy mismo y descubra cómo podemos ayudarle a alcanzar sus objetivos de comunicación! Accepted payment methods: takeaway=undefined
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4597059 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	弘扬学校人行天桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4393355 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	美利达加宽桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3155621	1	~ 4 years ago	opened	---	深圳市第29中学
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
1531862	1	~ 8 years ago	opened	火风物联	星际中心
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4100809	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	龙海桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4549645 Category: unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	---	时光里 5 栋
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
1839666	1	~ 7 years ago	opened	---	百门前工业区
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 5 months ago	closed	散掉的冰块 ♦3	曾经这里确实是“百门前工业区”，但是2020~2023年间升级改造后改名了。现在这个工业区确实叫做“中交科技城”
521748	1	~ 10 years ago	opened	---	可园一至三期
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3348976	1	~ 4 years ago	opened	---	龙珠花园B区
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4134871	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	布吉-吉华界碑 4A 2016粤府
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3607591	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Acemaxima	"罗湖棚改现场指挥部" POI name: 罗湖棚改现场指挥部 POI types: office-government OSM data version: 2023-02-09T14:02:34Z #mapsme
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4781942 Category: Organicmaps	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Wanderer GoGo ♦15	"toilet number 8" OSM snapshot date: 2025-04-18T15:38:17Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-toilets #organicmaps android
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
5025930 Category: CoMaps	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	klorydryk ♦23	"c'est un luckin coffee" The place has gone or never existed. A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-09-06T09:48:08Z POI name: 阿迪达斯 POI types: shop-sports #CoMaps android
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 3 months ago	closed	Taksine ♦616	已经把错误的阿迪达斯删除
5025927 Category: CoMaps	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	klorydryk ♦23	"plus de banque" The place has gone or never existed. A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-09-06T09:48:08Z POI name: 招商银行 POI types: amenity-atm #CoMaps android
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 3 months ago	closed	Taksine ♦616	已删除
4734365 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	深圳古玩城牌坊 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4319790	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	雅园立交3#桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4700498 Category: Organicmaps	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Quoz ♦32	"Wrong location." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-01-21T15:15:53Z POI name: colors POI types: tourism-hotel #organicmaps android
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 3 months ago	closed	Taksine ♦616
	6	~ 3 months ago	reopened	Taksine ♦616
	7	~ 3 months ago	closed	Taksine ♦616	我已经删除
4319791	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	深圳大学罗湖校区 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 1 year ago	closed	楊展博
	3	~ 1 year ago	reopened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
	4	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	5	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	6	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4011762	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Rohitsingh2001	"Jin Zhi Mei Business Hotel" POI name: Jin Zhi Mei Business Hotel POI types: tourism-hotel OSM data version: 2023-06-06T06:59:44Z #mapsme
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4785226 Category: unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469	Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44377305/history still under costruction? Then it should be highway=construction if blocked or have construction=minor tag if pasable. If it is no longer under construction, then construction tag should be removed
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469	The same problem is there Why you marked it as solved?
	5	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	6	~ 1 month ago	closed	Alexcarrillo12 ♦23	Seguir más pacientes
627384	1	~ 10 years ago	opened	---	莲花二村惠民街市
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4643098 Category: unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	---	LIJian Energy
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4986196 Category: Organicmaps	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Luchsor ♦5	U-Bahn Eingang 8 #organicmaps android
	2	~ 11 months ago	closed	lgh21312312313
	3	~ 11 months ago	reopened	lgh21312312313
	4	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	5	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	6	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	7	~ 8 months ago	closed	Skylark_H_C ♦226	Added in changeset 177688143
4774521 Category: Organicmaps	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Wanderer GoGo ♦15	"Couldn't find it there" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-04-18T15:38:17Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-toilets #organicmaps android
	2	~ 1 year ago	closed	Quandary·Z y
	3	~ 1 year ago	reopened	Fizzie-DWG ♦7,739
	4	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	5	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	6	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
5048148 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	Yichi Yang	南门
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3315144	1	~ 4 years ago	opened	---	新洲北环立交桥
	2	~ 2 years ago	commented	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	北环新洲立交桥
	3	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	4	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	5	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4021303	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	凯丰路口人行天桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 10 months ago	closed	Meowshui ♦1
	3	~ 10 months ago	reopened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
	4	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	5	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	6	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4948603 Category: Unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	---	Twin towers
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	Has been exist.
3939656	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	民乐互通
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4560213 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	民塘路5号 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4849772 Category: unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	---	22.5991286 114.0374411
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4101921	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	白龙路立交桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4591077 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	民丰路人行天桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4319786	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	新区大道7号 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4319787	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	深圳燃气龙华二线调压站 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4319788	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	新区大道3号 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4591078 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	玉龙立交D匝道桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
4591080 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	南坪快速 K18 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
4313412	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	南坪立交D匝道2桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
3993115	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	南坪立交B匝道2桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
4591081 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	南坪快速 K17 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
4591082 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	南坪快速 K16 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
4591083 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	南坪快速 K15 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
4591085 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	南坪快速 K14 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
4155444	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	哈尔滨工业大学深圳国际设计学院
	2	~ 1 year ago	closed	ItsPio ♦1
	3	~ 1 year ago	reopened	ItsPio ♦1
	4	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	5	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	6	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	7	~ 8 months ago	closed	石狮子 ♦4	没有问题
4155447	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	哈尔滨工业大学深圳国际设计学院宿舍
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 8 months ago	closed	石狮子 ♦4	没有问题
5022406 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	kywrd ♦2	此处已建设为公园
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
	5	~ 8 months ago	closed	石狮子 ♦4	已建成公园
3758487	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	西丽L1桥
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4021038	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	壮大工业区 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4784565 Category: unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	---	邮政信箱
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kmpoppe ♦3,729
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kmpoppe ♦3,729	This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4499115 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	ma908690 ♦28	怡園路南一巷 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4499113 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	ma908690 ♦28	embark #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4423001 Category: unknown	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	PARK
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4296115	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	西丽幼儿园丹华公馆分园 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4471071 Category: unknown	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	绿创云谷
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4423003 Category: unknown	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	PARK
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4423004 Category: unknown	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	PARK
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4423005 Category: unknown	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	PARK
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4423002 Category: unknown	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	PARK
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
2379389	1	~ 6 years ago	opened	---	Headquarters: Building B, C and E, Fenda science and Technology Creative Park, Xixiang, Bao'an District, Shenzhen
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
810397	1	~ 9 years ago	opened	xtkwfn	三围奋达科技园 (OSM data version: 2016-11-23T15:14:03Z) #mapsme
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4157828	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Scicomath	深圳市海柔创新科技有限公司
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4776720 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	裕安学校 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4831983 Category: unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	---	布心二村
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4135181	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	---	宝安-南山界碑 20 国务院1997
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4302545	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	应工四街 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4302543	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	应工一街 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4302544	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	应工三街 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4021040	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	应人石生态水库碧道 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4480641 Category: unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	---	tower
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4252208	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	K7+742小桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4021067	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	深圳市石岩湖学校 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4335536	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	K7+265小桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4021021	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	清恬路跨线桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4021022	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	福州立交 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
3865309	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	福永北行出入口匝道桥
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
3865310	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	5号门前联络道
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
3865308	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	鹤州互通主线桥
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4224027	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	下角山人行天桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
4353099	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	B匝道 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
1404458	1	~ 8 years ago	opened	yhgfire	Vanjin Craftwork Co., Ltd.
	2	~ 8 years ago	commented	yhgfire	acrylic factory
	3	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
434990	1	~ 11 years ago	opened	---	media facade
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
2942290	1	~ 4 years ago	opened	---	深圳金音通科技有限公司深圳市宝安区航城街道办鹤州恒丰工业城C3栋8楼
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
5092647 Category: Unknown	1	~ 9 months ago	opened	myonk ♦15	这里是簕杜鹃谷公园，缺少了公园内部细节和公园往凤凰山的登山道
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
5071874 Category: OsmAnd	1	~ 10 months ago	opened	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148	民德桥 #OsmAnd
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	Obanazawa Kuri ♦5,148
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	bpaz709394
	4	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
5038051 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	where name:zh?
	2	~ 11 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	*area
	3	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	4	~ 9 months ago	reopened	bpaz709394
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	It seems this is resolved. Closing.
5038052 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	individual buildings and streets, where name:en?
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	5	~ 8 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not sure where the `name:zh` came from in the first place; can't survey due to `access=private` and can't find any useful info online.
	6	~ 8 months ago	commented	Skylark_H_C ♦226	I believe these names are real. Refer to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5L_oSHKvck (vlog of the experience in this hostel)
	7	~ 8 months ago	commented	Skylark_H_C ♦226	but yes, some of these streets have no English name. (4:50 in the video)
	8	~ 8 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	1. copyright 2. If it cannot be verified without entering an `access=private` premise I believe it would cause problems verifiability.
	9	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Re "copyright" I quote https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/is-a-youtube-video-an-acceptable-source/125692/5 > However, factual information in that video is probably not “the video or a non-trivial excerpt from it”. So, for example, if someone has gone for a leisurely walk around a town centre, filmed it, uploaded it to YouTube, and you spot a sign for a streetname that’s unmapped in OSM, it’s not a copyright infringement to use that information to update OSM. The YT video may be an acceptable source. Granted, this doesn't enable us to large-scale scrape YouTube videos. imo just use it sparingly. ------- Re "verifiability": Shrugs. As long as it isn't a military base, it will be verifiable. Just that it may take many many years for probability to assign an OSM user into the area. Consider the possibility within the next 10 years an overseas OSM user decided to take residence here, and then we will have verifiability.
	10	~ 8 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	1. Anyway, as Kovoschiz said in Discord, Youtube videos can never be used to map OSM due to Terms of Services, regardless of copyright. 2. Imo this is too private, e.g. you wouldn't indoor map your home even though you are an OSM user who can verify it.
	11	~ 8 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	1. " (And… then there’s terms of use to consider. Google Maps has a clause that says roughly “by using this site, you agree that you won’t use features like Street View to update your own map database”, no matter what copyright law might say. I haven’t looked to see whether YouTube has anything like this because I try to avoid YouTube as much as humanly possible, though I doubt it.) "
	12	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	I opened this note because it's highly unusual that we have streets in HK that have no English names. A san-check/survey may be needed. With the YT video, I can san-check that, indeed, the streets not having English names is normal. We can have a middleground where I add a note to 1331 stating that the streets really do not have English names.
	13	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	YT TOS https://www.youtube.com/t/terms#c3e2907ca8 : > You are not allowed to: > > access, reproduce, download, [...] Taking a single frame and then do stuff does not sound like reproducing. afaik updating the notes field brings no meaningful change to the map data (for other mappers only), so probably should not cause damage, but don't quote me on that.
	14	~ 8 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	> You are not allowed to use the Service to view or listen to Content other than for personal, non-commercial use Taking a single frame is certainly "viewing", and OSM's license does nothing to prohibit data consumers from using `note=` for commercial purposes.
	15	~ 8 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	well then
5034390 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Is this a Family Medicine Clinic?
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	5	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	This looks like an amalgamation of two facilities.
	6	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	It turns out this is not a FMC, but more like an "outlet hospital".
	7	~ 8 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Nonetheless, resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177481541 ; closing.
5034389 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Family Medicine Clinic
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	5	~ 8 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177558823 ; closing.
2218616	1	~ 6 years ago	opened	kleeah	Public transport Routing at Lam Tin to be added
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	5	~ 7 months ago	closed	Josephfunny202603131237_
	6	~ 7 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	7	~ 7 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	8	~ 4 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	The following buses call at Lam Tin (terminus, not road side): 1. KMB 14 (China Ferry Terminal → Lei Yue Mun Estate) 2. KMB 14B (Ngau Tau Kok → Lam Tin (Kwong Tin Estate)) 3. KMB 14B (Lok Wah → Lam Tin (Kwong Tin Estate)) 4. KMB 14H (Yau Tong ↺ Shun Lee) 5. KMB 14X (Shung Tak Wai ↺ Tsim Sha Tsui) 6. KMB 15X (Hung Hom Station → Lam Tin (Kwong Tin Estate)) 7. KMB 42C (Lam Tin Station → Cheung Hang) 8. KMB 42C (Cheung Hang → Lam Tin Station) 9. KMB 89D (Lam Tin Station → Wu Kai Sha Station) 10. KMB 89D (Lam Tin Station → Wu Kai Sha Station (omit Hung Ngok House)) 11. KMB 89D (Wu Kai Sha Station → Lam Tin Station) 12. KMB 93M (Choi Ming → Po Lam) 13. KMB 215X (Kowloon Station → Lam Tin (Kwong Tin Estate)) 14. KMB 216M (Lam Tin Station ↺ Yau Tong Station) 15. KMB 252X (Lam Tin Station → Chi Lok Fa Yuen) 16. KMB 252X (Handsome Court → Lam Tin Station) 17. KMB 252X (So Kwun Wat → Lam Tin Station) 18. KMB 258A (Hung Shui Kiu (Hung Fuk Estate) → Lam Tin Station) 19. KMB 258D (Lam Tin Station → Po Tin) 20. KMB 258D (Po Tin → Lam Tin Station) 21. KMB 258P (Lam Tin Station → Hung Fuk Estate Hung Tin Road) 22. KMB 258P (Hung Shui Kiu (Hung Fuk Estate) → Lam Tin Station) 23. KMB 277A (Lam Tin Station → Sha Tau Kok) 24. KMB 277A (Sha Tau Kok → Lam Tin Station) 25. KMB 277B (Lam Tin Station → Kong Nga Po Hong Kong Police College) 26. KMB 277B (Kong Nga Po Hong Kong Police College → Lam Tin Station) 27. KMB 277E (Lam Tin Station → Tin Ping Estate) 28. KMB 277E (Tin Ping Estate → Lam Tin Station) 29. KMB 277E (Tin Ping Estate → Lam Tin Station (omit Ching Ho Estate)) 30. KMB 277P (Lam Tin Station → Tin Ping Estate) 31. KMB 277P (Tin Ping Estate → Lam Tin Station) 32. KMB 277X (Lam Tin Station → Luen Wo Hui) 33. KMB 277X (Luen Wo Hui → Lam Tin Station) 34. KMB 277X (Luen Wo Hui → Lam Tin Station (omit Wah Ming)) 35. KMB 277X (Wah Ming → Lam Tin Station) 36. KMB 600 (Anderson → Central (Rumsey Street)) 37. Cross-harbour Bus 601 (Po Tat → Admiralty (East))
	9	~ 4 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	38. Cross-harbour Bus 601P (Po Tat → Wing Kut Street) 39. Cross-harbour Bus 601P (Hiu Lai Court → Wing Kut Street) 40. Cross-harbour Bus 606 (Choi Wan (Fung Shing Street) → Siu Sai Wan (Island Resort)) 41. Cross-harbour Bus 606 (Choi Wan (Fung Shing Street) → Siu Sai Wan (Island Resort) (via Choi Ha Road)) 42. Cross-harbour Bus 606A (Choi Wan (Fung Shing Street) → Yiu Tung) 43. Cross-harbour Bus 606X (Kowloon Bay → Siu Sai Wan (Island Resort)) 44. Cross-harbour Bus 606X (Kai Yip → Siu Sai Wan (Island Resort)) 45. Cross-harbour Bus 606X (Kai Yip → Siu Sai Wan (Island Resort) (via Sheung Yuet Road stop)) 46. KMB 613A (On Tai (West) (Wo Tai House) → Heng Fa Chuen) 47. Cross-harbour Bus 619 (Shun Lee → Central (Macao Ferry)) 48. Cross-harbour Bus 619P (Shun Lee → Central (Macao Ferry)) 49. Cross-harbour Bus 641 (Kai Tak (Kai Ching Estate) → Central (Macao Ferry)) 50. Cross-harbour Bus 671 (Diamond Hill Station → Ap Lei Chau (Lee Lok Street)) 51. Cityflyer A22 (Lam Tin Station → Airport) 52. Cityflyer A22 (Lam Tin Station → Airport (via Cathay City)) 53. Cityflyer A22 (Airport → Lam Tin) 54. Cross-harbour Bus N619 (Shun lee → Central (Macao Ferry)) 55. Cross-harbour Bus N691 (Tiu Keng Leng → Central (Macao Ferry)) 56. KMB T277 (Lam Tin Station → Sheung Shui) 57. KMB T277 (Sheung Shui → Lam Tin Station) 58. KMB X42P (Tsing Yi Station → Lam Tin Station) Currently it seems like 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 22, 29, 38, 39, 44, 45, 49, 50, 54, 55, 56, and 57 are missing.
5082020 Category: Unknown	1	~ 10 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Kwun Tong Line: The upper and lower rails are stitched together in OSM, which is incorrect; both rails should be separate irl.
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Largely resolved; closing.
1450246	1	~ 8 years ago	opened	---	track position is incorrect; the siding is about halfway between yau tong and tiu keng leng stations
	2	~ 1 year ago	closed	seewhyso ♦189	The current version is now depicting the siding in the midway between the two stations
	3	~ 1 year ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 1 year ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	There does not seem to be any changes to the siding's geometry from the date of the note?
	5	~ 10 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	I mean, sometimes we may find notes that simply repeat the OSM situation at time of writing. Looking at the history, this seems like one of them. In terms of engineering, assuming the track curves are correct/accurate, then "midway between stations" is indeed the most likely configuration/position of the siding. We may close this.
	6	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	7	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	8	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	9	~ 9 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Upon detailed review: what a mess. Also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5082020
	10	~ 9 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	lgtm resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176809908 ; closing.
2218614	1	~ 6 years ago	opened	kleeah	Public Transport Routing at Ping Tin to be added.
	2	~ 4 years ago	commented	AWX4	Pls help thx
	3	~ 4 years ago	closed	MPatrick1013
	4	~ 4 years ago	reopened	MPatrick1013
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	6	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	7	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	8	~ 7 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	The following bus routes call at Ping Tin: 1. KMB 15 (Ping Tin → Hung Hom (Hung Luen Road)) 2. KMB 15 (Hung Hom (Hung Luen Road) → Ping Tin) 3. KMB 15A (Ping Tin → Tsz Wan Shan (North)) 4. KMB 15A (Tsz Wan Shan (North) → Ping Tin) 5. KMB 16 (Ping Tin → Mong Kok (Park Avenue)) 6. KMB 38 (Ping Tin → Kwai Shing (East)) 7. KMB 38 (Kwai Shing (East) → Ping Tin) 8. KMB 38P (Ping Tin → Kwai Shing (Central)) 9. KMB 38P (Kwai Shing (Central) → Ping Tin) 10. KMB 40A (Kwai Hing Station → Ping Tin) 11. KMB 40B (Kwai Chung Estate → Ping Tin) 12. KMB 88X (Ping Tin → Sui Wo Court) (Route A) 13. KMB 88X (Ping Tin → Sui Wo Court) (Route B) 14. KMB 88X (Sui Wo Court → Ping Tin) (Route A) 15. KMB 88X (Sui Wo Court → Ping Tin) (Route B) 16. KMB 603 (Ping Tin → Central (Central Ferry Piers)) 17. KMB 603 (Central (Central Ferry Piers) → Ping Tin) 18. KMB 603 (Ping Tin → Admiralty Centre) 19. KMB 603A (Ping Tin → Central Market) 20. KMB 603A (Rumsey Street → Ping Tin) 21. KMB 603P (Central (Central Ferry Piers → Ping Tin) 22. KMB 603S (Ping Tin → Gilman Street) Currently it seems like 18 to 22 is unmapped.
5034387 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Family Medicine Clinic
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	5	~ 9 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	/rant I swear to god, every time I went to Kwun Tong (Yue Man Square), every time I got bamboozled by irl, because every time the OSM data is somehow wrong.
	6	~ 8 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177326598 ; closing.
5034392 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Family Medicine Clinic
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	5	~ 9 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	too clumsy; I would silent-reopen and then forward to DWG
	6	~ 9 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177023883 ; closing.
5099138 Category: Unknown	1	~ 9 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39550532 , etc., ?
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	5	~ 8 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	It seems like this is difficult to survey on foot. Might need to take a bus that uses https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113146414 e.g. 13X, 28, 213X, 224X, 297, X6C.
	6	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	To clarify this note, this really feels like duplicate mapping. eg this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205404050 has construction=motorway_Link but then https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113146414 already exists. This might be an armchair mistake. I think I tried to delete this in the past, but it was reverted.
	7	~ 8 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	Updated (had already marked what they are supposed to be)
	8	~ 8 months ago	closed	Kovoschiz ♦2,281
5093604 Category: Unknown	1	~ 9 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Various "dots" exist in this area with nothing but "name=Yau Ma Tei Interchange"; what for?
	2	~ 9 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	Seems another user omission. In general, `junction=yes` can be used for named junctions, and the confusingly UK-named `=motorway_junction` for exits. However in this case, HK has the special practice of gazetting some roadways to be named "Interchange" as "streets", and it's not straightforward to determine the extent of YMT Interchange when it overlaps with Jordan Rd. For consistency and better support, they can still be considered.
	3	~ 9 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	What I mean is, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2861669105 this is just a named "dot". The meaning is unclear.
	4	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	5	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	6	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	7	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	I remember seeing named dots in the subway tracks, and that's to help with identifying which rail path the node belongs to when the rail paths are overlapping. Here the shape is complex, but the overlapping is minimal, so we may just clear the names from the dots.
	8	~ 8 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177674914 ; closing.
5105251 Category: Unknown	1	~ 9 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	todo: use motorway_link for multi-exit end-of-line junctions (e.g. see Western Harbour Crossing).
	2	~ 9 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	It turns out Route 6 is described as "merges into Route 3 (Kwai Chung Side)" (see https://www.td.gov.hk/en/transport_in_hong_kong/hk_strategic_route_and_exit_number_system/map/r6/index.html )
	3	~ 9 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	This has no effect, as it's the same for others https://www.td.gov.hk/en/transport_in_hong_kong/hk_strategic_route_and_exit_number_system/map/r3/index.html
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	(There's even Rt 3 end on both directions)
	5	~ 9 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Counterpoint: Route 7 states "merges into Route 5 (Tsuen Wan side)" (see https://www.td.gov.hk/en/transport_in_hong_kong/hk_strategic_route_and_exit_number_system/map/r7/index.html ); we map it as "trunk road all the way".
	6	~ 9 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	Northern terminal is further complicated by Tsing Long Hwy being on Rt 9 between the Interchange and San Tin Hwy north of NU22. It would be as if CKB is on Rt 3 between WHC and WKH. On the other hand, here it's complicated by Rt 9 merges into `noref=yes` Lin Cheung Rd first.
	7	~ 9 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	If we are willing to break the "one road physical cross-section -> one OSM way" rule, then the solution becomes trivial.
	8	~ 9 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Another counterpoint: Look at the Route 1 / Route 9 superposition near Racecourse. I think a solution is possible while staying inside the "one cross-section -> one way rule".
	9	~ 9 months ago	commented	Kovoschiz ♦2,281	1. That's unacceptable 2. I don't see what's the relevance here. There's no Rt 3 and 6 concurrency.
	10	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	11	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	12	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	13	~ 8 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	I now see Route 3 -> Route 6 is using motorway; this makes sense because we have precedent for this in Route 5 -> Route 7, which contains an exit for Route 5 itself and also provide the (branching) starting point for Route 7. I see Route 6 -> Lin Cheung Road is also using motorway. Upon rethinking, I have no real proposals/ideas for the Lin Cheung Road -> Route 3 part. If anything, this can be revisited in the indeterminate future when highway reclassification happens. Then, nothing to do here. Closing.
5063775 Category: Unknown	1	~ 10 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Re note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5056582 , see whether this Saigon Street becomes "eastbound only" later.
	2	~ 10 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	As of yesterday (2025-11-29) it's still oneway westbound, but just in case it changes in the future, I will leave this note open until the nearby works are complete, presumably when the Central Kowloon Bypass opens.
	3	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	4	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	5	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	6	~ 8 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Ok, it really is oneway eastbound now...
	7	~ 8 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Wait, I think I made a mistake. Need to recheck.
	8	~ 8 months ago	closed	kingkingHK ♦524	Nevermind, it is still oneway westbound. Somehow, I messed up my sense of direction. Nothing to do; closing.
	9	~ 8 months ago	reopened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521
	10	~ 8 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	https://www.td.gov.hk/en/traffic_notices/index_id_83986.html It seems it's lasting longer than expected. We can recheck this later.
	11	~ 7 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	It's time.
	12	~ 6 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	It's delayed again until 22 March...
	13	~ 6 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	It seems the arrangement is over.
	14	~ 6 months ago	closed	kingkingHK ♦524	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180490726 ; closing.
5087538 Category: Unknown	1	~ 10 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	todo: Some clinics have generic names, which may be improved.
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	5	~ 8 months ago	closed	KX675 ♦19	Just unified the tagging of those constituent clinics to reflect their full name with "Yau Ma Tei", and corrected "衛生" to "衞生".
5036094 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	kingkingHK ♦524	Family Medicine Clinic somewhere around here supposedly, but unclear how it is affected by the redevelopment works.
	2	~ 10 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	I went there recently, and saw it's in the old building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429468747 I would guess it's gonna be relocated into Phase 2 later, so we may choose to ignore this for now.
	3	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	4	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	5	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	6	~ 4 months ago	commented	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Upon website review ( https://www32.ha.org.hk/capitalworksprojects/tc/Project/10years/Kwong-Wah-Hospital/Introduction.html ), the Phase 2 reconstruction is scheduled to complete in 2029. In retrospect, not the best move to give this note to the future, because the future is too far away. Let's redo this.
	7	~ 4 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183432974 ; closing.
5112165 Category: Unknown	1	~ 9 months ago	opened	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12373210037 afaik this is not open yet.
	2	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Believable; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337663584 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337663585 has `=construction` and `opening_date=2026-06-30`.
	3	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	4	~ 9 months ago	reopened	bpaz709394
	5	~ 9 months ago	closed	bpaz709394
	6	~ 9 months ago	reopened	kingkingHK ♦524
	7	~ 9 months ago	commented	kingkingHK ♦524	Not done yet; please don't resolve!
	8	~ 9 months ago	closed	vectorial8192 ♦1,521	Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176862072 ; closing.