chath_tsu for the last 12 Monthschath_tsu for the last 12 Months| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5300693 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 19 days ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | Are the HOV lanes really two separate ways with limited time access and left side counterflow running? If it is one carriageway that is reversible, it should be tagged oneway=reversible and add the time restrictions there |
| 5281421 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | PSU Urban Center now has platforms on both sides |
| 2 | ~ 19 days ago | closed | tguen ♦1,441 | ||
| 5260330 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | new paths and structures now visible on Esri aerial |
| 5234619 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | the express lanes here aren't physically separated and shouldn't be mappedd as separate ways |
| 5197150 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | Is there a reason why the HOV lane on WB I-90 is mapped as a separate way? There is no physical seperation from the rest of the carriageway, and much of it is separated only by a single white line |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | I have no idea. It was added recently (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173912155) by a TomTom mapper. I think it would make more sense for it to be a single highway=motorway, but never got around to commenting that changeset for asking in Slack. Please go ahead and do that if you'd like. I hope this isn't some routing hack for something that doesn't understand lane tagging... Other random note is that the changeset I linked above has a #maproulette tag—I wonder if we could hunt down the challenge and figure out what it's trying to do. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | Map Roulette has some outdated ways of defining bad content so unless you know it will guide you down the wrong use | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | MapRoulette challenge is https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/53382. Seems questionable, does somebody want to hunt it down? | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | Cross-ref: Forwarded to OSMUS Slack at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1774155463110039. | |
| 6 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | I cleaned this up across the bridge and through Mt. Baker tunnel to get started. The bus relations and lane tagging make it a pain, but this is a start. | |
| 7 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | Continued cleanup to Bellevue way exit. | |
| 8 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | Thank you @pwbriggs ! | |
| 9 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦722 | Finished this all the way through Issaquah! Lemme know if I messed anything up. | |
| 5206349 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | how do we feel about the Harrison right turn lane mapped as a separate way here? |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦11,343 | shouldn't be separated | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | I think so too, interesting that this has been here for 5 years | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | Unless it's median separated like a slip lane, should not be its own way | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | edit made 👍 | |
| 5195385 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | trimet service change: route 24 no longer routes via Kerby and takes a more direct route to Fremont. This pair of stops on Kerby are closed https://trimet.org/servicechanges/2026march.htm |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | bobthebuilder423468 ♦73 | im not good at changing routes but i removed the stations. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | reopened | tguen ♦1,441 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | tguen ♦1,441 | sounds like you didn't resolve the issue | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | people128256 ♦241 | Fixed | |
| 5195281 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | the ways mapped as bike paths around here are painted bike lanes and shouldn't be mapped as separate ways |
| 5188573 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | Are the "on demand" traffic signals around the county campus actual traffic signals, or are they button-operated crossing beacons that aren't signals? |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | The latter | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | cool I'll change the tags then! | |
| 5104178 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | can we verify if this is a bike path or a bike-designated side road? signages seem to suggest it is a street rather than a path, and there looks to be a house with vehicular access |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | RLIS doesn't find anything, considering that there is a house connected I will update it to a driveway. Feel free to reopen/comment if you disagree. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | Looked at the street sign in question in Street View. I can see why one would interpret that as the name of the driveway. However, considering that Willamete Dr is the name of the OR 43 roadway I think it's just a driveway. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | people128256 ♦241 | ||
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | reopened | chath_tsu ♦123 | I think i would change the other half of it to driveway as well as theres no physical or signed differences between the two sections, but yea there's not a lot of evidence on the ground for one or the other. I found a survey report that mapped it as part of the highway https://westlinnoregon.gov/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning/page/5249/buck_street_survey.pdf | |
| 6 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | I disagree, the eastside connection connects as the right side bike lane and not as a full-fledged intersection, even though it could (in theory) function as a driveway. | |
| 7 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | thats fair, but it could also be that it just happens to connect with the road at that angle and the striping is similar to what other driveways would be like (if not for the angle). It is kinda strange that I couldn't find information on who owns this, whether it is city, ODOT, or private. It doesn't exist on ODOT or West Linn GIS data. The "bike route" sign at the entrance of this seems to be city installed, and ODOT GIS says there is no bicycle facility on this side of the highway for this strech so it's probably not theirs. But Clackamas county survey, and the previously mentioned West Linn survey, doen't list it as a separate ROW: https://maps.clackamas.us/survey/PSImages/2S1E/24/SN2020-189-P23.tif So yea I am pretty confused. I know OSM doesn't care about ownership, but it'd be good to know who has the final say and who to ask. | |
| 8 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | I emailed West Linn's GIS department, and they said that they don't have data on it, but it is within ODOT's ROW so they are the ones to check | |
| 9 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | Not on ODOT TransGIS. Do you think keeping this inference is reasonable? | |
| 10 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | I think yea we can keep is as is right now till I hear back otherwise | |
| 11 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | I emailed ODOT and they responded, saying they are checking with their ROW and regional active transportation teams, since it is “possibly” within their ROW but has not been added by the bike/pedestrian group to their highway data. But they also said that it is “definitely” a bike path. So I think it might be a bike path but with motor_vehicle=destination situation? Awaiting further information | |
| 12 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | ODOT’s active transportation person responded, saying it is indeed classified as a bike path and it is ODOT-owned. I replied asking for a clarification as it is a bike path with local motor vehicle access, but I haven’t heard from them back yet. Looks like it is a bike path with motor_vehicle=destination case which is rare but not nonexistent. | |
| 13 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | What needs to be clarified here? We know it's a bike path with non-thru access for cars... | |
| 14 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | I wanted them to clarify the exact car access level since it's not signed or easily inferrable (motor_vehicle=destination? private? yes?) and it's a pretty unusual situation, but yes it probably won't change much anyway. | |
| 15 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | Doesn't look like I'll be getting any more information from ODOT, closing this. Final version is highway=cycleway, motor_vehicle=destination | |
| 5130844 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | copied from fixme: Can we verify that this is actually a seprate bike path and not just a painted bike lane? If it is a standard bike lane then it shouldn't be mapped as a separate feature - I looked on streetview and looks like the sidepath is for contraflow bike traffic, and bike traffic in the other direction uses a standard painted bike lane? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Aerial imagery (Bing Maps) makes it look like this is a painted bikelane on the westbound side, and there is no bike lane on the eastbound side. There is a detached sidewalk for a short distance on that side just south of the intersection with Lombard, starting right around where this bike lane "ends". | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | yes i think the westbound painted bike lane should be mapped as tags on the main roadway, and the vertically separated side path on the north side should be a multi-use path with oneway EB bicycle (there are markings and signs designating it for bikes and peds but it's not visible from aerials) | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | this might be helpful: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Bicycle_routing | |
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | whoopse did not mean to leave the hastag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle | |
| 6 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | ||
| 5153598 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | C-TRAN bus routes: not more route 37, it's been the Vine Red Line since 2023. The route relations should be edited |
| 5152793 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | POI need survey and update (esri imagery shows this plot has been rebuilt and looks to be a different use) |
| 5152756 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | roads in this trailer park needs to be updated (see aerial) |
| 5151481 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | looks like some ways in this intersection were edited in a way that the geometry, relations, and stop signs here no longer make sense |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Hypsometric ♦4,451 | Fixed. | |
| 4955211 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | missing paths |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | dannmer ♦18,950 | Link to map: https://japanesegarden.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/PJG-Printout-Map-English-Template-June-2025.pdf | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | thank you but we probably can't just copy from privately owned maps :/ i'll try to do GPS traces the next time i go there | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | I can try to do one based on satellite images. | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | Never mind, it's covered in trees. But let me try GPS traces. | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | Apparently the current GPS traces aren't sufficient. So I can't do this myself. | |
| 7 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | i added the path using my own GPS track a while back. it's not super accurate but better than nothing | |
| 4933740 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | Broadway/Weidler traffic config update with new bike infra, ped refugee islands, and lane reduction |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | updated | |
| 5127396 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | people128256 ♦241 | "Are the two segments of Reserve street actually physically separated? Considering how close they are" OSM snapshot date: 2026-01-06T21:33:01Z POI name: East 5th Street POI types: hwtag-yesfoot highway-tertiary #CoMaps ios 2026.01.09-28-ios |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | connected them to a single node | |
| 5068410 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | new bike track on south side of Fourth Plain between F street and Fort Vancouver Way |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | added https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177321674 | |
| 5132141 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | are the bikeways on Fourth Plain west of F street actually bike paths or are they bike lanes? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | pdxrider ♦209 | i believe this is resolved now (for the record these are painted bike lanes) | |
| 5132133 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | this section of fourth plain should be merged as a single carriageway |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦11,343 | updated | |
| 5117660 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | people128256 ♦241 | What type of road is this? A path? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | i think there was also an earlier note discussion about this but i dont know if it came to a conclusion. It's difficult to tell from aerials and it's not on any street level photos, so a survey might be needed but it's also in a private residential area | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | https://www.catlincrest.com/p/Plat-Map | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | My guess is it's also a residential road as with the roads it is connected to, and it's more of a big intersection with a tree in the middle | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | https://www.portlandmaps.com/advanced/?action=aerial if you switch to the winter aerial on Portlandmaps, the road surface is now visible with the lower canopy coverage, although the most recent winter aerial on the website is from 2012 | |
| 6 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | people128256 ♦241 | ||
| 7 | ~ 3 months ago | reopened | people128256 ♦241 | Alright so I looked at the imagery in question. It does look like the roundabout which was originally mapped. I'll be restoring that. | |
| 8 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | people128256 ♦241 | ||
| 5092875 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | people128256 ♦241 | I don't see the point of marking only Grand (99E NB) as trunk between Taylor and Everett. Thoughts? |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tguen ♦1,441 | MLK and Grand are both tagged as trunk up to their respective connections to I-84 which accurately reflects traffic patterns. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | ||
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | reopened | people128256 ♦241 | ||
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | Why has this been resolved? MLK between the Morrison Bridge and I-84 is still tagged as primary, regardless of what @tguen suggests. | |
| 6 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | because the connection from i84 to MLK is via the Morrison bridge? | |
| 7 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | people128256 ♦241 | I understand now, thank you. | |
| 5060300 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | Bill Muchmore ♦11 | Marked crosswalk and bioswale |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | added | |
| 5091787 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | people128256 ♦241 | "Dubious traffic light. Does this exist?" OSM snapshot date: 2025-12-09T01:54:54Z POI has no name POI types: highway-traffic_signals #CoMaps ios 2025.12.11-2-ios |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦11,343 | Seems to be a side effect of having the link separated where the other northbound light hits the main road. Not perfect but is going to happen with separated ways | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | I looked at some street-level imagery and both are served by what looks like the same signal. I wonder if there is a way to merge it? | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | These are in fact separate ways at the stop line. They are physically separated, and are treated as two separate incoming ways by the signal phasing. I am moving the signals onto the incoming ways and removing them from the intersecting nodes to avoid a duplicate signal on Holladay (though it isn't accessble for motor vehicles so it's rather irrelevant). | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | reopened | chath_tsu ♦123 | Also re @people128256 - the traffic signal mapping on OSM isn't concerned with the physical signal lights; rather it is a representation of the signal's effects on the highway elements. | |
| 6 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | ||
| 5102001 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | looks like the bike paths mapped here around Black Lake Blvd are simply painted bike lanes. They should not be mapped as separate ways, and instead as cycleway tags on the highway ways for the main road |
| 2 | ~ 23 days ago | closed | Theresa Ellingsen ♦22 | ||
| 3 | ~ 23 days ago | reopened | Theresa Ellingsen ♦22 | Done | |
| 4 | ~ 23 days ago | closed | Theresa Ellingsen ♦22 | ||
| 5098306 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | this left turn lane isn't physically separated and shouldn't be mapped as a separate way |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦11,343 | I think this one is appropriate due to the geometry of the intersection | |
| 5097978 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | looks like a misplaced node on the footpath |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦11,343 | dragged back | |
| 2578038 | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | new interchange ramps |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | ||
| 4341384 | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | a missing section of railway |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | ||
| 4693611 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | how do you tag instances like this where the traffic direction is opposite from the normal traffic direction of this jurisdiction? (LHT here) |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | ||
| 4869110 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | is this really a seperate carriageway? from all sources i looked at it's just a bus bay |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | cleaned up https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175693983 | |
| 4948713 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | no buses allowed on Campus Drive at the moment due to long term construction (beginning july 2024 if not earlier). all buses are continuing down Jackson Park Road |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | Does this mean a relation needs to be updated or should the road just be tagged with bus=no? | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | I think the bus route relations need to be updated since it's a long term change | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | the construction is now complete and buses are now back to their original (and currently mapped) routing | |
| 4980912 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | hdevine825 ♦691 | Modal filter, only bicycles can continue straight on Lincoln via StreetComplete 61.3 |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | the modal restrictions have been mapped as restriction relations. they don't show up on static map renderings but should be accounted for in routings. i added bike exceptions to the restrictions | |
| 4994219 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | A previous edit changed access from private to yes. There is a sign that says private drive, but ODOT says it is a city owned road. |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | IMO then we should keep it as yes or "destination" may be better, as "private" disables routing to buildings on a said street. That may just be OSRM though. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | yea i think i'll keep it as yes then! | |
| 5060595 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | these turn lanes are not physically separated and should not be mapped as separate ways |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | jhaluska80 ♦3,253 | I reworked the turn lanes. I also fixed some nearby turn lanes and added missing turn restrictions. | |
| 5048723 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | bus stops and routings have changed in the hollywood district. 42nd & Weidler has been replaced by 42nd & Halsey |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | pantspantses | ||
| 5019003 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | looks like the striping here changed so the west seattle bridge ramp and harbor island ramp has separate exits from the main roadway, instead of splitting from one ramp |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦722 | Updated, thanks! | |
| 5012752 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | new striping and lane config |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,441 | ||
| 4936657 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Mommy Cartographer ♦21 | large bike rack via StreetComplete 61.3 |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | ||
| 5004827 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | bridge structures on different layers mapped as one bridge area here |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | What are you referencing? I-5, "I-405", or something else? | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,441 | ||
| 4971333 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | aikidd ♦1 | "Norwegian restaurant that replaced the Mexican place. https://photos.app.goo.gl/mPpAMdyuQU4KUxNb8" OSM snapshot date: 2023-07-10T17:38:00Z POI name: Viking Soul Food POI types: amenity-restaurant #organicmaps android |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | feature had been added | |
| 4966807 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | split 82nd for new traffic island |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | That doesn't seem like such a good idea as, from what I can see in the satellite imagery, the island is so short that I don't see any point in splitting 82nd | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | yea that's fair i think i'll leave it as is. i just added a missing turn restriction and it should be good | |
| 4959769 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | I think this block of Barbur should be split into two oneway carriageways because of the median curb and the amount of driveways/service roads. It's not possible to cross the median of Barbur but currently no turn restrictions are set up to account for that, and I think oneway carriageways is a cleaner solution that having turn restrictions for every driveway. |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,441 | ||
| 4918830 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | J T E ♦29 | Going either direction on 2nd, only R turn allowed here, except bikes |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | turn restrictions have been added | |
| 4956050 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | road closure is 7/7-11/7 |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | ||
| 4955947 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | road classification discontinuity |
| 4955946 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | road classification discontinuity |
| 4936480 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Mouthbones ♦3 | I was mistaken. The storage place is next door |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | ||
| 4936459 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Mouthbones ♦3 | No extra sidewalk here perpendicular to Milwaukie via StreetComplete 61.3 |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | resolved | |
| 4796585 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | Edthebikeguy ♦16 | Marking this and many other roads in the Airport as bikeable is blatantly irresponsible. They built bike lanes and have frontage roads that parallel the main road in and out of the airportfor this reason. That main road is nothing short of a freeway with fast cars in multiple lanes. Then, you have the Departures road (and others) as bikeable roads. That's flat out dangerous. I just did it and was almost hit on multiple occasions. Bikes have no business on these roads. We might as well start marking freeways as bikeable if these are okay. The thing is, OSM feeds other systems that then tell bikers that these are roads they can/should do. They should not! Somebody is going to die. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4796589: biking is not legally prohibited | |
| 4796589 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | Edthebikeguy ♦16 | Having this tagged as a bikeable section is flat out dangerous. To bike that, they must get into the far left lane of three fast moving and very busy lanes of traffic. I literally sat on my bike on an early Sunday morning for a long time and saw no possible way to safely bike it. |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | I agree that biking on Airport Way would be a bad idea, but since there are no signage explicitly prohibiting bike it is by default legal according to Oregon law. Airport Way is tagged with RLIS:bicycle=caution_area and there are designated bike paths nearby which together should ddiscourage routing engines from routing onto Airport Way. | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦241 | Edthebikeguy, which app did you use? | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Edthebikeguy ♦16 | I use the Wandrer website. It is for walkers and bike riders that want a challenge to ride every road (trail etc) in a given area. And when you are committed to completing and they get their source from OSM, guess what? You get a bunch of people out there unsafely trying to ride this. There are more than 3,000 riders in Portland logging new miles in Portland based on what OSM is telling them us rideable. That is where I disagree with the whole "legal" vs dangerous debate. There is another section on Ross Island bridge that is even worse than this one that just got reverted back to bikeable even the to get to it you have to ride the bridge on the side that has no sidewalk or shoulders, no room for a bike on a lane with constant traffic going at freeway speeds. | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | people128256 ♦241 | Cannot reproduce with OSRM, and from my memory, not CoMaps either. This seems like a bug on their end and I'd report an issue to Wandrer. | |
| 4669189 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | cincodenada ♦48 | Unable to answer "Is there a bench at this stop?" – Union Station/Northwest 6th & Hoyt (Light Rail Platform) – https://osm.org/way/126671374 via StreetComplete_ee 60.2: There are two individual seats here, with a roof over them |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | added as tag | |
| 4689729 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Afghan Halal Market |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | added POI | |
| 4840767 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | anholt ♦2 | Shouldn't be marked as a crosswalk across Powell at 87th. Very unprotected, should direct peds to 86th. via StreetComplete 61.1 |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | tagged explicitly as unmarked and unprotected | |
| 4830336 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | --- | Renamed to SeatGeek Plaza #OsmAnd |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | renamed | |
| 4880946 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | Line 76 bus to/from Oregon City does not enter Meridian Hospital and instead serves (currently unmapped) stops on Boland. It is also missing a few stops around Stafford and Willamette. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | pdxrider ♦209 | taken care of by someone else recently | |
| 4879220 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | new bus lane & island |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,441 | ||
| 4877706 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | Can we clarify the basis of giving the Oregon portion a Washington state route ref? I did a little digging and found conflicting evidence. Evidence/argument for: TIGER Lines assign the Oregon portion, between state line and the first intersection with US 30 ramps, as WA 433; new ODOT overhead signage on EB US 30 signs the exit as "WA 433" instead of "To WA 433" Evidence/argument against: WSDOT GIS has WA 433 ending at state line; ODOT GIS shows the Oregon portion as ODOT-owned and maintained, not part of signed routes, and as a connection rather than a highway route; having a WA state route in OR is very unusual and I'm not aware of similar cases |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | pdxrider ♦209 | The justification for the WA route ref extending into Oregon was there used to be a WA 433 reassurance marker going northbound on the Oregon side after the ramps, which is no longer there now. I'd be in favor of cutting the route designation back to the state line. | |
| 4849158 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | juliancdunn ♦1 | The section of SW 65th Avenue south of SW Southview Street is technically part of the on/offramp to I-5 and should be marked as such, because otherwise it shows up on cycling maps. There is a sign on the SW corner of SW Southview/SW 65th stating that non-motorized vehicles are prohibited beyond that point. |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | I agree - I've changed the classification https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169372213 I've also removed the name= tag for this road as I couldn't find any physical evidence that it's called SW 65th and both PBOT and ODOT has it as a freeway connection. There is also a case to be made that the section between Southview and Haines also be tagged as motorway_link as it is owned by ODOT, has continuous physical characteristics with the on/off ramp, and is described as such in PBOT/ODOT GIS data. But I am aware that OSM US convention is to not extend motorway_link beyond the first street intersection so I've decided against it for now. | |
| 4792072 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Aragorn2 ♦16 | Unable to answer "Does this crossing have markings across the roadway?" – Crossing – https://osm.org/node/1291122455 via StreetComplete 61.0: It's a pedestrian overpass, there are no road markings below Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/282484.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦123 | the photo you attached looks like the overpass over Burnside and not at the note's location | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,441 | ||
| 4818053 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | Shouldn't light rail level crossings be tagged as railway crossings instead of tram crossings? |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦722 | Don't know if it's correct or not, but they're tagged as (non-tram) railway crossings in Seattle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1762833213 | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦969 | probably my doing, the ones in Seattle were before the special tag formed. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦969 | everything looks good here closing note | |
| 4647151 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦123 | this section of Powell (13th Pl - 12th Ave, maybe up to Milwaukie) should be mapped as two-way highways to account for the central turn lane |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | pdxrider ♦209 | You should be aware of a discussion regarding recent changes along inner Powell: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160592679 | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 | ||
| 4799320 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | Spyderz ♦2 | There is a road here via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/283607.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦123 |