chath_tsu for the last 12 Monthschath_tsu for the last 12 Months| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5499621 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 hours ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | TriMet route 29 (and others) rerouted as part of the August 2026 service cut |
| 5441310 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 29 days ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | new bus lane and protected bike lane on Washington from ~76th to ~92nd |
| 2 | ~ 19 days ago | closed | people128256 ♦390 | Added based on a best effort with what you've described | |
| 5377910 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | the road markings on the slip road seems to suggest that left turns are allowed here, which isn't how it's mapped here. but i am also struggling to come up with a map representation that satisfies routing and also geometry |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | gpserror ♦11,992 | I redrew it in a way that should satisfy the routing requirements at expense of pretty geometry. Not sure how to draw without the island or with a fake island... | |
| 5300693 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | Are the HOV lanes really two separate ways with limited time access and left side counterflow running? If it is one carriageway that is reversible, it should be tagged oneway=reversible and add the time restrictions there |
| 5281421 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | PSU Urban Center now has platforms on both sides |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,479 | ||
| 5260330 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | new paths and structures now visible on Esri aerial |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | jjyach ♦64 | ||
| 5234619 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | the express lanes here aren't physically separated and shouldn't be mappedd as separate ways |
| 5197150 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | Is there a reason why the HOV lane on WB I-90 is mapped as a separate way? There is no physical seperation from the rest of the carriageway, and much of it is separated only by a single white line |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,004 | I have no idea. It was added recently (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173912155) by a TomTom mapper. I think it would make more sense for it to be a single highway=motorway, but never got around to commenting that changeset for asking in Slack. Please go ahead and do that if you'd like. I hope this isn't some routing hack for something that doesn't understand lane tagging... Other random note is that the changeset I linked above has a #maproulette tag—I wonder if we could hunt down the challenge and figure out what it's trying to do. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,044 | Map Roulette has some outdated ways of defining bad content so unless you know it will guide you down the wrong use | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,004 | MapRoulette challenge is https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/53382. Seems questionable, does somebody want to hunt it down? | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,004 | Cross-ref: Forwarded to OSMUS Slack at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1774155463110039. | |
| 6 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,004 | I cleaned this up across the bridge and through Mt. Baker tunnel to get started. The bus relations and lane tagging make it a pain, but this is a start. | |
| 7 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | pwbriggs ♦1,004 | Continued cleanup to Bellevue way exit. | |
| 8 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | Thank you @pwbriggs ! | |
| 9 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦1,004 | Finished this all the way through Issaquah! Lemme know if I messed anything up. | |
| 5206349 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | how do we feel about the Harrison right turn lane mapped as a separate way here? |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦14,804 | shouldn't be separated | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | I think so too, interesting that this has been here for 5 years | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | Unless it's median separated like a slip lane, should not be its own way | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | edit made 👍 | |
| 5195385 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | trimet service change: route 24 no longer routes via Kerby and takes a more direct route to Fremont. This pair of stops on Kerby are closed https://trimet.org/servicechanges/2026march.htm |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | bobthebuilder423468 ♦160 | im not good at changing routes but i removed the stations. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | reopened | tguen ♦1,479 | ||
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | tguen ♦1,479 | sounds like you didn't resolve the issue | |
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | people128256 ♦390 | Fixed | |
| 5195281 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | the ways mapped as bike paths around here are painted bike lanes and shouldn't be mapped as separate ways |
| 5188573 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | Are the "on demand" traffic signals around the county campus actual traffic signals, or are they button-operated crossing beacons that aren't signals? |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | The latter | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | cool I'll change the tags then! | |
| 5104178 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | can we verify if this is a bike path or a bike-designated side road? signages seem to suggest it is a street rather than a path, and there looks to be a house with vehicular access |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | RLIS doesn't find anything, considering that there is a house connected I will update it to a driveway. Feel free to reopen/comment if you disagree. | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | Looked at the street sign in question in Street View. I can see why one would interpret that as the name of the driveway. However, considering that Willamete Dr is the name of the OR 43 roadway I think it's just a driveway. | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | people128256 ♦390 | ||
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | chath_tsu ♦126 | I think i would change the other half of it to driveway as well as theres no physical or signed differences between the two sections, but yea there's not a lot of evidence on the ground for one or the other. I found a survey report that mapped it as part of the highway https://westlinnoregon.gov/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning/page/5249/buck_street_survey.pdf | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | I disagree, the eastside connection connects as the right side bike lane and not as a full-fledged intersection, even though it could (in theory) function as a driveway. | |
| 7 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | thats fair, but it could also be that it just happens to connect with the road at that angle and the striping is similar to what other driveways would be like (if not for the angle). It is kinda strange that I couldn't find information on who owns this, whether it is city, ODOT, or private. It doesn't exist on ODOT or West Linn GIS data. The "bike route" sign at the entrance of this seems to be city installed, and ODOT GIS says there is no bicycle facility on this side of the highway for this strech so it's probably not theirs. But Clackamas county survey, and the previously mentioned West Linn survey, doen't list it as a separate ROW: https://maps.clackamas.us/survey/PSImages/2S1E/24/SN2020-189-P23.tif So yea I am pretty confused. I know OSM doesn't care about ownership, but it'd be good to know who has the final say and who to ask. | |
| 8 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | I emailed West Linn's GIS department, and they said that they don't have data on it, but it is within ODOT's ROW so they are the ones to check | |
| 9 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | Not on ODOT TransGIS. Do you think keeping this inference is reasonable? | |
| 10 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | I think yea we can keep is as is right now till I hear back otherwise | |
| 11 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | I emailed ODOT and they responded, saying they are checking with their ROW and regional active transportation teams, since it is “possibly” within their ROW but has not been added by the bike/pedestrian group to their highway data. But they also said that it is “definitely” a bike path. So I think it might be a bike path but with motor_vehicle=destination situation? Awaiting further information | |
| 12 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | ODOT’s active transportation person responded, saying it is indeed classified as a bike path and it is ODOT-owned. I replied asking for a clarification as it is a bike path with local motor vehicle access, but I haven’t heard from them back yet. Looks like it is a bike path with motor_vehicle=destination case which is rare but not nonexistent. | |
| 13 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | What needs to be clarified here? We know it's a bike path with non-thru access for cars... | |
| 14 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | I wanted them to clarify the exact car access level since it's not signed or easily inferrable (motor_vehicle=destination? private? yes?) and it's a pretty unusual situation, but yes it probably won't change much anyway. | |
| 15 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | Doesn't look like I'll be getting any more information from ODOT, closing this. Final version is highway=cycleway, motor_vehicle=destination | |
| 5130844 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | copied from fixme: Can we verify that this is actually a seprate bike path and not just a painted bike lane? If it is a standard bike lane then it shouldn't be mapped as a separate feature - I looked on streetview and looks like the sidepath is for contraflow bike traffic, and bike traffic in the other direction uses a standard painted bike lane? |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Aerial imagery (Bing Maps) makes it look like this is a painted bikelane on the westbound side, and there is no bike lane on the eastbound side. There is a detached sidewalk for a short distance on that side just south of the intersection with Lombard, starting right around where this bike lane "ends". | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | yes i think the westbound painted bike lane should be mapped as tags on the main roadway, and the vertically separated side path on the north side should be a multi-use path with oneway EB bicycle (there are markings and signs designating it for bikes and peds but it's not visible from aerials) | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,044 | this might be helpful: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Bicycle_routing | |
| 5 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,044 | whoopse did not mean to leave the hastag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle | |
| 6 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | ||
| 5153598 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | C-TRAN bus routes: not more route 37, it's been the Vine Red Line since 2023. The route relations should be edited |
| 2 | ~ 18 days ago | closed | tguen ♦1,479 | ||
| 5152793 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | POI need survey and update (esri imagery shows this plot has been rebuilt and looks to be a different use) |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Brian'sPants ♦14 | Marked old buildings as demolished, added new Bio Logics business. | |
| 5152756 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | roads in this trailer park needs to be updated (see aerial) |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Brian'sPants ♦14 | I've realigned the roads here based on Bing imagery that show the new structures after the fire. | |
| 5151481 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | looks like some ways in this intersection were edited in a way that the geometry, relations, and stop signs here no longer make sense |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | Hypsometric ♦4,452 | Fixed. | |
| 4955211 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | missing paths |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | dannmer ♦22,536 | Link to map: https://japanesegarden.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/PJG-Printout-Map-English-Template-June-2025.pdf | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | thank you but we probably can't just copy from privately owned maps :/ i'll try to do GPS traces the next time i go there | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | I can try to do one based on satellite images. | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | Never mind, it's covered in trees. But let me try GPS traces. | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | Apparently the current GPS traces aren't sufficient. So I can't do this myself. | |
| 7 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | i added the path using my own GPS track a while back. it's not super accurate but better than nothing | |
| 4933740 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | Broadway/Weidler traffic config update with new bike infra, ped refugee islands, and lane reduction |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | updated | |
| 5127396 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | people128256 ♦390 | "Are the two segments of Reserve street actually physically separated? Considering how close they are" OSM snapshot date: 2026-01-06T21:33:01Z POI name: East 5th Street POI types: hwtag-yesfoot highway-tertiary #CoMaps ios 2026.01.09-28-ios |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | connected them to a single node | |
| 5068410 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | new bike track on south side of Fourth Plain between F street and Fort Vancouver Way |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | added https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177321674 | |
| 5132141 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | are the bikeways on Fourth Plain west of F street actually bike paths or are they bike lanes? |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | pdxrider ♦214 | i believe this is resolved now (for the record these are painted bike lanes) | |
| 5132133 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | this section of fourth plain should be merged as a single carriageway |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦14,804 | updated | |
| 5117660 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | people128256 ♦390 | What type of road is this? A path? |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | i think there was also an earlier note discussion about this but i dont know if it came to a conclusion. It's difficult to tell from aerials and it's not on any street level photos, so a survey might be needed but it's also in a private residential area | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | https://www.catlincrest.com/p/Plat-Map | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | My guess is it's also a residential road as with the roads it is connected to, and it's more of a big intersection with a tree in the middle | |
| 5 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | https://www.portlandmaps.com/advanced/?action=aerial if you switch to the winter aerial on Portlandmaps, the road surface is now visible with the lower canopy coverage, although the most recent winter aerial on the website is from 2012 | |
| 6 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | people128256 ♦390 | ||
| 7 | ~ 6 months ago | reopened | people128256 ♦390 | Alright so I looked at the imagery in question. It does look like the roundabout which was originally mapped. I'll be restoring that. | |
| 8 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | people128256 ♦390 | ||
| 5092875 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | people128256 ♦390 | I don't see the point of marking only Grand (99E NB) as trunk between Taylor and Everett. Thoughts? |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | tguen ♦1,479 | MLK and Grand are both tagged as trunk up to their respective connections to I-84 which accurately reflects traffic patterns. | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | ||
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | people128256 ♦390 | ||
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | Why has this been resolved? MLK between the Morrison Bridge and I-84 is still tagged as primary, regardless of what @tguen suggests. | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | because the connection from i84 to MLK is via the Morrison bridge? | |
| 7 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | people128256 ♦390 | I understand now, thank you. | |
| 5060300 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Bill Muchmore ♦11 | Marked crosswalk and bioswale |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | added | |
| 5091787 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | people128256 ♦390 | "Dubious traffic light. Does this exist?" OSM snapshot date: 2025-12-09T01:54:54Z POI has no name POI types: highway-traffic_signals #CoMaps ios 2025.12.11-2-ios |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦14,804 | Seems to be a side effect of having the link separated where the other northbound light hits the main road. Not perfect but is going to happen with separated ways | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | I looked at some street-level imagery and both are served by what looks like the same signal. I wonder if there is a way to merge it? | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | These are in fact separate ways at the stop line. They are physically separated, and are treated as two separate incoming ways by the signal phasing. I am moving the signals onto the incoming ways and removing them from the intersecting nodes to avoid a duplicate signal on Holladay (though it isn't accessble for motor vehicles so it's rather irrelevant). | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | chath_tsu ♦126 | Also re @people128256 - the traffic signal mapping on OSM isn't concerned with the physical signal lights; rather it is a representation of the signal's effects on the highway elements. | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | ||
| 5102001 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | looks like the bike paths mapped here around Black Lake Blvd are simply painted bike lanes. They should not be mapped as separate ways, and instead as cycleway tags on the highway ways for the main road |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Theresa Ellingsen ♦22 | ||
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | reopened | Theresa Ellingsen ♦22 | Done | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Theresa Ellingsen ♦22 | ||
| 5098306 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | this left turn lane isn't physically separated and shouldn't be mapped as a separate way |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦14,804 | I think this one is appropriate due to the geometry of the intersection | |
| 5097978 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | looks like a misplaced node on the footpath |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦14,804 | dragged back | |
| 2578038 | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | new interchange ramps |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | ||
| 4341384 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | a missing section of railway |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | ||
| 4693611 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | how do you tag instances like this where the traffic direction is opposite from the normal traffic direction of this jurisdiction? (LHT here) |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | ||
| 4869110 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | is this really a seperate carriageway? from all sources i looked at it's just a bus bay |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | cleaned up https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175693983 | |
| 4948713 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | no buses allowed on Campus Drive at the moment due to long term construction (beginning july 2024 if not earlier). all buses are continuing down Jackson Park Road |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | Does this mean a relation needs to be updated or should the road just be tagged with bus=no? | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦126 | I think the bus route relations need to be updated since it's a long term change | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | the construction is now complete and buses are now back to their original (and currently mapped) routing | |
| 4980912 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | hdevine825 ♦707 | Modal filter, only bicycles can continue straight on Lincoln via StreetComplete 61.3 |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | the modal restrictions have been mapped as restriction relations. they don't show up on static map renderings but should be accounted for in routings. i added bike exceptions to the restrictions | |
| 4994219 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | A previous edit changed access from private to yes. There is a sign that says private drive, but ODOT says it is a city owned road. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | IMO then we should keep it as yes or "destination" may be better, as "private" disables routing to buildings on a said street. That may just be OSRM though. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | yea i think i'll keep it as yes then! | |
| 5060595 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | these turn lanes are not physically separated and should not be mapped as separate ways |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | jhaluska80 ♦3,592 | I reworked the turn lanes. I also fixed some nearby turn lanes and added missing turn restrictions. | |
| 5048723 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | bus stops and routings have changed in the hollywood district. 42nd & Weidler has been replaced by 42nd & Halsey |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | pantspantses | ||
| 5019003 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | looks like the striping here changed so the west seattle bridge ramp and harbor island ramp has separate exits from the main roadway, instead of splitting from one ramp |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | pwbriggs ♦1,004 | Updated, thanks! | |
| 5012752 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | new striping and lane config |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,479 | ||
| 4936657 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Mommy Cartographer ♦21 | large bike rack via StreetComplete 61.3 |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | ||
| 5004827 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | bridge structures on different layers mapped as one bridge area here |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | What are you referencing? I-5, "I-405", or something else? | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,479 | ||
| 4971333 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | aikidd ♦1 | "Norwegian restaurant that replaced the Mexican place. https://photos.app.goo.gl/mPpAMdyuQU4KUxNb8" OSM snapshot date: 2023-07-10T17:38:00Z POI name: Viking Soul Food POI types: amenity-restaurant #organicmaps android |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | feature had been added | |
| 4966807 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | split 82nd for new traffic island |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦390 | That doesn't seem like such a good idea as, from what I can see in the satellite imagery, the island is so short that I don't see any point in splitting 82nd | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | yea that's fair i think i'll leave it as is. i just added a missing turn restriction and it should be good | |
| 4959769 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | I think this block of Barbur should be split into two oneway carriageways because of the median curb and the amount of driveways/service roads. It's not possible to cross the median of Barbur but currently no turn restrictions are set up to account for that, and I think oneway carriageways is a cleaner solution that having turn restrictions for every driveway. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,479 | ||
| 4918830 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | J T E ♦30 | Going either direction on 2nd, only R turn allowed here, except bikes |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | turn restrictions have been added | |
| 4956050 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | road closure is 7/7-11/7 |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 | ||
| 4955947 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | road classification discontinuity |
| 4955946 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦126 | road classification discontinuity |
| 4936480 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Mouthbones ♦3 | I was mistaken. The storage place is next door |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦126 |