| Note | # | Tmstmp UTC | Event | Contributor | Comment | Auto-translation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4086044 | 1 | 2024-01-25 14:11 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | An external source suggests that the Plough https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/805590476 might not be currently open. Needs a survey to check current status. | |
| 2 | 2025-11-13 11:35 | commented | Tristan Scott ♦328 | looks open when passing, cars out side and lights on | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-13 11:46 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Thanks - sounds good to me! | ||
| 4860552 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-17 08:27 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | As noted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18835045 , cycle access as mapped in OSM "just stops" here on the motorway. Imagery suggests that a separate path exists across the motorway bridge. I didn't notice signage when last here (but wasn't looking for it); but the cycle route past the Millennium Hotel is signed. Probably needs local knowledge or a survey to say what is best here. | |
| 2 | 2025-11-04 14:57 | commented | andy mackey ♦214 | The cycle route seems to cross the A15 400m east ( of your marker) and Valhalla nd Graphhopper then take you south 400m over the minor road bridge. I'm driving through here soon but I doubt, without being on foot or bike, I can see much. Hi by the way. | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-05 23:36 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Actually, looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/32019#map=16/52.50107/-0.29088 , someone moved the route south about a week ago, which matches Sustrans (or Walk Wheel Cycle Trust as they are now) and makes a lot more sense. I'll close this note and remove this spur (which from memory, isn't signed). Thanks! | ||
| 4838559 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-04 10:18 | opened | --- | U895 | |
| 2 | 2025-11-01 01:08 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Note not actonable - no idea what it means? | ||
| 4919464 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-20 06:53 | opened | --- | Would somebody please add the boundaries of the various districts of the Metropolitan Borough of Kirklees? | |
| 2 | 2025-11-01 01:07 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Suburbs are there or thereabouts; wards tend not to be in OSM. I'm not sure what "districts" means in this context. | ||
| 3913770 | 1 | 2023-09-29 07:05 | opened | --- | Would someone with local knowledge please add the boundaries of the various wards and suburbs in the Metropolitan Borough of Kirklees? | |
| 2 | 2025-11-01 01:06 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Suburbs are there or thereabouts; wards tend not to be in OSM. | ||
| 4430138 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-09-11 12:18 | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,685 | Has The Aspley closed? | |
| 2 | 2025-11-01 01:03 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The bigger question I suspect is "has it been bulldozed yet". I didn't notice any branding when I walked past in the summer, and it didn't look very lively (but then it never did). See https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckvgwpdnk07o . | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-01 10:58 | commented | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,685 | Thanks - I've updated it to disused. Maybe this note should be left open for someone to check the current state. | ||
| 529765 | 1 | 2016-03-19 00:02 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | According to http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=27365306 , Westminster has spent most of its time as a town rather than a city (especially when it has last been added by locals). Currently it's a "city" - is that correct? (the confusing thing here is that "city" in OSM terms means "calls itself a city in real life" - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity for the discussion about that) | |
| 2 | 2016-03-19 00:11 | commented | Derick Rethans ♦601 | It's very much *not* regarded as a city IMO. The only city in the city in London, would be the "City of London". | ||
| 3 | 2016-03-19 00:32 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Oops - I meant to say: ..."city" in OSM terms DOES NOT mean "calls itself a city in real life" :) | ||
| 4 | 2024-09-20 22:40 | commented | Hammershark77 | However the borough calls itself "Westminster City Council" | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 19:14 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 19:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 7 | 2025-10-25 07:04 | commented | harg ♦3,385 | The title of https://www.westminster.gov.uk/ should be good enough to confirm that Westminster calls itself a city. | ||
| 8 | 2025-10-25 07:06 | commented | harg ♦3,385 | If I remember correctly, a city in traditional UK terms is a place with a cathedral. Westminster Cathedral is well known. | ||
| 9 | 2025-10-25 11:41 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I know that the current UK head of state (and once suggested "Defender of All Faiths") had a nice chat with the Pope last week, but I don't thing that Westminster Cathedral (a catholic cathedral) counts! St Paul's however, I'll grant you :) Whether a "place=city" in OSM should match "what a place calls itself" or "has a cathedral" or "places that a legally cities in the local country" or "the largest settlement or settlements within a territory" has been discussed on and off for years. The OSM wiki suggests the last of these, which might invalidate St David's and might include Reading, but current OSM tagging in IE and UK favours legal status: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ejy . This note follows a comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36574595 and was intended to see if that change had broad support among people who actually live in Westminster. It hasn't been changed back (or provoked further discussion elsewhere) since 2016 so I'll close this note. | ||
| 5019965 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-23 16:57 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | ncn via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/312291.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/312292.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-24 22:30 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/312292.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6388390665 | ||
| 5009440 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-16 17:30 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | venus sign via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/311026.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-24 22:28 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/311026.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13254999847 | ||
| 5009427 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-16 17:27 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | mars sign via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/311020.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-24 22:25 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/311020.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13255018007 | ||
| 5001258 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-10-11 15:28 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | milestone via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/310005.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-24 22:22 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/310005.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13255011927 | ||
| 4981576 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-27 14:05 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | pfn nodderdale way low sikes 1.25 pbs nidderdale way wath 3 6d rm e via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/307373.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-10-24 22:17 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/307373.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13175910631 | ||
| 4295956 | 1 | 2024-06-17 15:54 | opened | --- | The restaurant belonging to the brewery is now called Salt Beer + Kitchen cf. https://taps.saltbeerfactory.co.uk/bar-kitchen/ | |
| 2 | 2025-10-23 15:53 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4581414 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-08 11:56 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There's a gap in the cycle route https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/72568#map=19/50.344163/-4.763759&layers=N here, but I suspect that a local might want to check to see if these really are roundabouts (and not mini roundabouts) and if not whether the approaches should be oneway. Be nice, because the edits were made by a relatively new user in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160695643 . Cheers, Andy | |
| 2 | 2025-10-22 21:15 | commented | Flynn_ ♦125 | Can confirm these are mini-roundabouts, made the edit months ago and forgot to say so here 😅 | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-22 22:36 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Thanks - I've filled in the gaps in the cycle route and the bus routes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173649311 . | ||
| 4891161 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-03 22:51 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | According to reports, the White Swan has closed, changed hands, and reopened as the "Olivia Swan". No idea if it still does real ale, food or accommodation. | |
| 2 | 2025-09-30 16:51 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | According to press reports it has shut again. | ||
| 4956462 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-11 00:01 | opened | HoubkneghteS ♦41 | Graystone Hotel National Register Historic Places - build year 1917 via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/304490.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-24 17:43 | closed | Easton_17Mikki_93Aurora_22_* | |||
| 3 | 2025-09-25 13:38 | reopened | ICT_maps ♦3,156 | |||
| 4 | 2025-09-25 22:21 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | @Easton_17Mikki_93Aurora_22_* - you resolved this note without taking any other action (which isn't what notes are for). If you'd just like to "not see notes", use the "layers" tag at the right, scroll down and untick "Map Notes". | ||
| 5 | 2025-09-27 17:44 | closed | HoubkneghteS ♦41 | Added NHRP Tags, closing this out | ||
| 4973174 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-21 14:22 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 66 (68) 66 68 pf via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/306415.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-25 21:23 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/306415.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13172041878 | ||
| 4973416 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-21 15:33 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Suitable for cars only Maximum width 2m or 6'-6" Also 30 Also PB via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/306472.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-25 21:16 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/306472.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21415302 | ||
| 4978951 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-25 15:11 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | l 31.25, lp 96 via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/307082.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-25 21:11 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://streetcomplete.app/p/307082.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9458074346 | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-25 21:12 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-09-25 21:12 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/307082.jpg | ||
| 4978973 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-25 15:31 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | blank one via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/307086.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-25 21:09 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/307086.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13171994533 | ||
| 4978983 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-25 15:38 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | l32.25, lp 95 via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/307090.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-25 21:06 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/307090.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6123903740 | ||
| 4979006 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-25 15:49 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 1/2 via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/307093.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-25 21:05 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/307093.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6123903744 | ||
| 4979014 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-25 16:00 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | l 33.25, lp 94 via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/307094.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-25 21:01 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/307094.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6123903754 | ||
| 4979020 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-25 16:06 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | separate bridge via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/307095.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-25 20:58 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/307095.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233835675 | ||
| 4979026 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-25 16:14 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 1/2 via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/307096.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-25 20:56 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/307096.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6123903763 | ||
| 174143 | 1 | 2014-05-25 22:52 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The two NPE-traced footpaths west of here need a proper survey. | |
| 2 | 2024-07-04 23:42 | closed | NorthYorkshire ♦101 | |||
| 3 | 2024-07-07 12:55 | reopened | gurglypipe ♦1,697 | |||
| 4 | 2024-07-07 12:55 | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,697 | These don’t appear to have been surveyed yet. | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 19:14 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 19:26 | reopened | gurglypipe ♦1,697 | |||
| 7 | 2025-01-01 19:26 | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,697 | Still not been surveyed. Please don’t close the note unless you have surveyed and updated them on the map. | ||
| 8 | 2025-01-01 20:03 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | If Gargave had more pubs it might be worth the trip :) | ||
| 9 | 2025-09-23 19:51 | commented | OSM Warrior ♦385 | Just curious, why does this need a survey? It is on the latest OS maps and showing on the north yorks council website. Surely most of the footpaths mapped on OSM have not been physically surveyed... | ||
| 10 | 2025-09-23 20:03 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Latest OS map data isn't OSM compatible. Local PRoW data https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#16/53.9904/-2.1165/H/P likely is (OGL 3). The challenge is that council data might not match the reality on the ground (up in the North York Moors it misses far more than it hits). Many, if not most, of OSM footpaths have been surveyed. I can certainly vouch for south of Gargrave and most ways from Skipton :) | ||
| 11 | 2025-09-23 20:04 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | And one more thing - my sniffy comment about pubs above was uncalled for - even the Stonegate one is nice :) | ||
| 12 | 2025-10-08 17:14 | closed | OSM Warrior ♦385 | Surveyed - path was only slightly out - added walls/ fences/ stiles/ gates at correct locations | ||
| 1406866 | 1 | 2018-05-27 09:51 | opened | --- | This garage is closed. There is work underway to replace the co-op food shop and, I believe, the garage. Due to open in the next few months. ^SL 2018-05-27 | |
| 2 | 2018-12-26 16:50 | commented | CrimsonCaribou ♦133 | I put in an approximation of the site after a (very brief) site visit which is a better representation than it was. It could be more accurate though. | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-21 14:33 | commented | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Asda Express | ||
| 4 | 2025-09-21 14:52 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Now updated | ||
| 5 | 2025-09-21 18:50 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 716824 | 1 | 2016-09-18 13:02 | opened | --- | Falta el mar territorial correspondiente a estas islas | |
| 2 | 2017-01-18 15:27 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Can you supply a source for that information - including evidence that it is controlled by Spain rather than just claimed? (traducción automática) ¿Puede proporcionar una fuente para esa información - incluyendo evidencia de que está controlada por España y no sólo reclamada? | ||
| 3 | 2019-01-27 12:06 | commented | --- | SomeOne else: The only island claimed by Spain and Morroco which belong to no one is Perejil island. The islands are officially Spanish, claimed by Morocco, that's why you even find them in purple. | ||
| 4 | 2019-01-27 13:30 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | @anonymous That wasn't what the note was claiming though, was it? It says "The territorial sea corresponding to these islands is missing". That's why I asked "Can you supply a source for that information - including evidence that it is controlled by Spain rather than just claimed?". This was referring to the sea, not the islands. | ||
| 5 | 2025-09-17 19:26 | commented | Hugoren Martinako ♦2,687 | I found the following link, it contains an SHP, even though Gibraltar waters are not included, it contains the geometries for Plazas de Soberanía https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/cartografia-y-sig/ide/descargas/costas-medio-marino/demarcaciones-marinas.html | ||
| 6 | 2025-09-17 21:18 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | (for completeness the current boundaries are https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1311341#map=8/35.387/-3.365 ). Given the sensitivity here, I'd definitely suggest raising this in the forum and making sure that both people from Spain and from Morocco see it (in case there are conflicting maritime claims here). Best Regards, Andy | ||
| 7 | 2025-09-19 19:48 | commented | Hugoren Martinako ♦2,687 | Post created: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/maritime-borders-morocco-spain-limites-maritimos-espana-marruecos/135855 | ||
| 8 | 2025-10-06 15:54 | closed | Hugoren Martinako ♦2,687 | Done | ||
| 4958863 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-12 17:42 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The England Coast Path here is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11738490#map=19/51.131325/1.340437 . At the time of adding this note there is a gap in it. How does the path get across it? See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166623567 . | |
| 4899304 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-08 15:25 | opened | rtwbike ♦142 | Amity Tattoo (previously a trainers shop) via StreetComplete 61.2 | |
| 2 | 2025-08-24 19:04 | commented | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | No, it is HocLoco now (whatevér that is) | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-12 14:25 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Apparently a bar: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3916676777 | ||
| 4951447 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-07 16:58 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | unsuitable for motor vehicles via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/303935.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-12 14:24 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/303935.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13138309152 | ||
| 4951498 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-07 17:35 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | exposed tpep pipeline via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/303956.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-12 14:19 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/303956.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429251177 | ||
| 4957490 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-11 17:01 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Sign in error; no obvious path E here. via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/304578.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-12 14:16 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/304578.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13138303002 | ||
| 400226 | 1 | 2015-07-21 00:32 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | This path appears to be a guess based on Strava traces; needs proper survey. If it exists, what are the access rights? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:40 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-09-06 15:01 | commented | alexswilliams ♦107 | These appear to be permissive de facto paths - no obvious markers or trailblazes that i can ser from the road, but there is genrrsl entry into the moor which describes it as access land with no dogs allowed Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/303539.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/303540.jpg | ||
| 5 | 2025-09-09 19:12 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Ah - fair enough. Thanks! | ||
| 4785773 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-01 17:42 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 6 Dales Trail via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281777.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 18:08 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://streetcomplete.app/p/281777.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8783629299 | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-08 18:11 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-09-08 18:12 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/281777.jpg | ||
| 4903263 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-10 20:11 | opened | --- | According to local press reports, the Blacksmiths Arms has apparently reopened. It is a Sam Smiths pub, so obviously needs checking. | |
| 2 | 2025-08-28 15:36 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Now open again | ||
| 3 | 2025-08-28 15:36 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4899166 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-08 14:30 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | grrr via StreetComplete 61.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/296826.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-21 23:07 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/296826.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13074121114 | ||
| 4922094 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-21 15:16 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Kirklees Way route marker. LH sign is illegible. via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/299827.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-21 23:06 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/299827.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13087767293 | ||
| 4922224 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-21 15:48 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | pfns 359, another pf sign, and emley moor via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/299839.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/299840.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-21 23:03 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/299839.jpg https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/299840.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13087765671 | ||
| 4922265 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-21 16:09 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Scammonden Dam via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/299847.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-21 22:53 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/299847.jpg | ||
| 4922317 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-21 16:23 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Scammonden Dam via StreetComplete 61.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/299864.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-21 22:52 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/299864.jpg | ||
| 317024 | 1 | 2015-02-15 21:45 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is there any sort of link between Bosworth Trail and Thornborough Road past here? there used to be http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27510797 , but that got deleted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27510797 . A proper survey is needed to see what the access restrictions are (and to see whether it is a public bridleway or similar). | |
| 2 | 2015-02-19 14:09 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The footpath's been re-added in http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329010050 - still need to check access and designation though | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:24 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 00:26 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 5 | 2025-06-30 06:31 | commented | lonerider543 ♦15 | It's a public bridleway as per https://www.leicestershire.gov.uk/roads-and-travel/cycling-and-walking/where-to-walk-and-ride-in-leicestershire | ||
| 6 | 2025-08-06 11:27 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Alas that page says "Leicestershire County Council Copyright © 2025". However, if you've been there and seen the public footpath signs, you can add "designation=public_footpath". | ||
| 7 | 2025-08-06 11:44 | commented | lonerider543 ♦15 | Thank you for the advice. I will check for any signs next time I go! | ||
| 8 | 2025-08-06 11:54 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Thanks! | ||
| 9 | 2025-08-17 19:09 | commented | lonerider543 ♦15 | Here's what I found in today's survey: https://imgur.com/a/6C9bygk No clear signage stating it is a public footpath/bridleway - but with the waymarker I think it is hinting at it, unless that is enough confirmation. The cycle information sign also seems to suggest it is part of the national cycle network (route 52) ? What are your thoughts? | ||
| 10 | 2025-08-17 21:22 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Well that second sign definitely looks like a yellow public footpath sign, so "designation=public_footpath" would make sense, I think. It looks like there's also a "Mines, Mines and Railways" walking route relation that could be added too. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3748275 is an example of that sort of thing, although that's a regional ("network=rwn") rather than a local ("network=lwn") one. | ||
| 11 | 2025-08-18 07:22 | closed | lonerider543 ♦15 | Great thanks, I have added the public_footpath designation. I cannot find anything else about the mills, mines and railways walking route and cannot find an existing relation so will leave that out for now. | ||
| 4899173 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-08 14:33 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | dis via StreetComplete 61.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/296827.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-16 11:44 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/296827.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13074108729 | ||
| 4899179 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-08 14:35 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | dis via StreetComplete 61.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/296830.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-16 11:42 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/296830.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13074149705 | ||
| 4899186 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-08 14:38 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | dis via StreetComplete 61.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/296832.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-16 11:40 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/296832.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13074101037 | ||
| 4899249 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-08 15:00 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | dis via StreetComplete 61.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/296845.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-16 11:38 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/296845.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13074138135 | ||
| 4896204 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-06 20:32 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I'm sure that there's something here commemorating the Battle of Cropredy Bridge (the reason for the spur on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3165973#map=19/52.114783/-1.315245 ). I'm surprised that it seems not to be mapped. | |
| 2 | 2025-08-15 17:33 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Yes, board to the north | ||
| 243699 | 1 | 2014-09-19 23:12 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | A car park with a capacity of -1 seems a bit odd? | |
| 2 | 2014-09-22 01:51 | closed | andrewpmk ♦30,708 | Changed to no capacity | ||
| 3 | 2014-09-22 07:19 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2014-09-22 07:19 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Reopened note - needs survey, not armchair guesswork. | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-30 00:18 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-30 00:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 7 | 2025-08-06 17:08 | commented | BenRG ♦68 | It's a private car park for the Heights of Abraham (authorised users only). Approx 15 spaces. | ||
| 8 | 2025-08-11 11:33 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Thanks - I've added that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170288205 | ||
| 4888877 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-02 16:56 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | No idea? via StreetComplete 61.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/295329.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-02 21:51 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/295329.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13043789080 | ||
| 4888942 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-02 17:45 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Small Eggar Moth via StreetComplete 61.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/295344.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-02 21:49 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/295344.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13043575483 | ||
| 4888961 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-02 17:56 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Common Toad via StreetComplete 61.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/295345.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-02 21:45 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/295345.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13043765599 | ||
| 4889025 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-02 18:57 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Harome Circular via StreetComplete 61.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/295351.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-02 21:43 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/295351.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13043755075 | ||
| 4889032 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-02 19:03 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Barn Owl via StreetComplete 61.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/295355.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-02 21:40 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/295355.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13043768260 | ||
| 4885727 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-31 16:39 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Is that a dual use church spire and pigeoncote? via StreetComplete 61.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/294900.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-08-01 15:16 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/294900.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425298562 | ||
| 4865276 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-20 04:22 | opened | siggyb ♦64 | Position not correct. I am missing during inserting the exakt position. Should be 50.824257,-121.345630 Don’t now how to correct. | |
| 2 | 2025-07-21 18:00 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | As you haven't said what is wrong, we can't help you. Please go to https://community.openstreetmap.org/ and ask a question there explaining what you want to do. | ||
| 4857047 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-15 17:00 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | no running faster than 20mph via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/290959.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-07-18 20:51 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/290959.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12999727696 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12996352593 | ||
| 4862936 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-18 17:03 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | pb ewn, perm fp s via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/291609.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-07-18 20:47 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/291609.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13009816926 | ||
| 4863029 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-18 17:50 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | thete is really nothing here via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/291639.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-07-18 20:42 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/291639.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13009851524 | ||
| 4863026 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-18 17:49 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | trail not really visible via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/291637.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-07-18 20:40 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/291637.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10046181664 | ||
| 4863025 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-18 17:48 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | alleged pf w via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/291636.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-07-18 20:38 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/291636.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13009787847 | ||
| 4863054 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-18 17:59 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | I don't think this gate has cloeed for a while via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/291652.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-07-18 20:34 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/291652.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5017944879 | ||
| 3535173 | 1 | 2023-01-28 07:49 | opened | Peter Newman ♦2,644 | Bus stop J is actually here now via StreetComplete 50.2 | |
| 2 | 2024-04-08 18:13 | closed | n4gxg22psz | 위험: 이 게시물은 심각한 오류로 인해 해결된 것으로 표시되었습니다. | ||
| 3 | 2024-04-09 07:44 | reopened | Peter Newman ♦2,644 | |||
| 4 | 2025-07-17 09:30 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | It us - someone moved it last month (and it was still there when I walked past a couple of days ago) | ||
| 2855239 | 1 | 2021-09-16 14:02 | opened | DaveF ♦691 | Is the Battersea Power Station Station ground level concourse open & walkable? | |
| 2 | 2021-09-16 22:11 | commented | harg ♦3,385 | Not sure, but recently published documents are showing without the tortology (ie, it's to be a station not a station station). So somebody needs to check the actual signage. | ||
| 3 | 2021-09-17 00:15 | commented | DaveF ♦691 | The signs are "Battersea Power Station" So to describe the station, as a station, Paddington = Paddington Station Nine Elms = Nine Elms Station Battersea Power Station = Battersea Power Station Station | ||
| 4 | 2021-09-17 06:52 | commented | harg ♦3,385 | But when mapping stations we have -- for example -- just Paddington, not Paddington Station. Therefore Battersea Power Station should be correspondingly mapped as Battersea Power Station and not, as currently, as a Station Station. Or, every other station should be remapped in the form Paddington Station, which would be better for search reasons. Currently if you search most stations you don't get the station you get a bus stop. But changing the mapping of every station would be a lot of work. | ||
| 5 | 2021-09-17 12:11 | commented | DaveF ♦691 | This is 'Battersea Power Station' https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4965216 The first 'station' in 'Battersea Power Station Station' refers to the power station. It has nothing to do with railways. It's Similar to the 'Park' in the adjacent 'Battersea Park' station. | ||
| 6 | 2021-09-17 12:27 | commented | DaveF ♦691 | https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-farringdon-station-entrance-london-79327658.html https://cdn.prgloo.com/media/59db6293466544ab96d22e2c346804de?width=580&height=580 Note hear how the name of the station is 'Farringdon'. It's the equivalent of 'Battersea Power Station' The sign for the station building is appended with 'Station to make it 'Farringdon Station' The same occurs in this case 'Battersea Power Station' is appended to become 'Battersea Power Station Station' | ||
| 7 | 2024-01-27 18:35 | commented | Peter Newman ♦2,644 | In terms of @DaveF original question the gateline is on - 1 on the middle of the H/I shape | ||
| 8 | 2024-04-08 18:12 | closed | n4gxg22psz | 위험: 이 게시물은 심각한 오류로 인해 해결된 것으로 표시되었습니다. | ||
| 9 | 2024-04-08 20:35 | reopened | DaveF ♦691 | |||
| 10 | 2024-04-08 20:43 | commented | DaveF ♦691 | Could someone please do an on-ground survey to remove all the irrelevant construction polygons in the surrounding area? | ||
| 11 | 2025-07-17 09:28 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | As of yesterday, the construction areas broadly match what's still there on the ground. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282286492 looked more like a big fence than a wall, but that's minor. Not sure I understand what is meant by "ground level concourse", but I suspect that the answer might be "no, not yet". | ||
| 4860590 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-17 09:13 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The Thames Path now goes east-west here, not west-south. It then must turn south somewhere after Chelsea Bridge as the padel court is a dead end and is signed as _not_ being the Thames Path. | |
| 4853415 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-13 13:49 | opened | --- | there is actually a dunkin' here please excuse my shitposting https://locations.dunkindonuts.com/en/nj/linden/651-north-stiles-street/362686 | |
| 2 | 2025-07-13 18:39 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Hello "anonymous" - if you know that there's something here, please edit the map to add it! | ||
| 4803970 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-13 08:44 | opened | --- | New street to be opened 26th June 2025 USRN 45803433 The Square to Hudson Boulevard | |
| 2 | 2025-07-06 09:38 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | This section looked mostly complete but didn't look open as of yesterday. I'll close this since I'm sure it'll open with a fanfare - there's no need for an OSM note to prompt people to check. | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-10 21:00 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-07-10 21:01 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The road apparently opened a couple of days ago and was updated in OSM yesterday https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1412269940#map=16/53.96009/-1.10486 | ||
| 4841746 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-06 16:01 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | ecp route marker via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/288984.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-07-07 23:40 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/288984.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12986690865 | ||
| 4274114 | 1 | 2024-06-01 09:05 | opened | itspaulkelly ♦20 | Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – house number 169: Vacant Shop – https://osm.org/node/5723215608 via StreetComplete 57.3: Now split into 169 and 169a Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/216059.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-07-06 09:48 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Still like this. See: https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/216059.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168553644 | ||
| 3652477 | 1 | 2023-04-21 09:55 | opened | ElectricDuck ♦154 | Disused warehouse in the process of being ripped down via StreetComplete 52.0 | |
| 2 | 2025-07-06 09:41 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | 2 years later it's fenced off but still standing... I'll close this note since I suspect it'll be pretty obvious when it does eventually come down. | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-12 08:55 | reopened | Cutiepie77 | |||
| 4837806 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-07-03 18:23 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Extent of fire (now recovering) to right/east, unaffected west via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/288417.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-07-03 22:07 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/288417.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7342893212 | ||
| 4807153 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-15 14:46 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | pnfs 612 via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/284594.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 23:34 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/284594.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12955141750 | ||
| 4826907 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-26 15:44 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | one side blank via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/286996.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 23:30 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/286996.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11951573968 | ||
| 4826911 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-26 15:47 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | brun valley greenwY, burnley way via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/286997.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 23:28 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/286997.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12955265207 | ||
| 4826921 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-26 15:55 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | burnleyway via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/287000.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 23:25 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/287000.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12955205526 | ||
| 4826950 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-26 16:18 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | bw gp via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/287005.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 23:22 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/287005.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12955227502 | ||
| 4826952 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-26 16:19 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | bancroft rd 0.7km w goit wood, briercliffe 0.5km ne netherwood rd se via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/287006.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 23:19 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/287006.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12955202538 | ||
| 4826961 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-26 16:24 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | bvg bw via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/287008.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 23:16 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/287008.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12955221460 | ||
| 4826971 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-26 16:30 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | bw via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/287009.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 23:01 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/287009.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12955203874 | ||
| 4826985 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-26 16:39 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | bronte way burnley way via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/287010.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 22:55 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/287010.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12955182854 | ||
| 4827009 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-26 16:49 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | bw via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/287012.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 22:47 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/287012.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12955172494 | ||
| 1763610 | 1 | 2019-05-01 16:22 | opened | vbrindle | Unable to answer "Is there a cycleway here? What type?" for https://osm.org/way/171557161 via StreetComplete 11.0: No cycle lane here | |
| 2 | 2019-06-11 06:28 | commented | --- | No | ||
| 3 | 2025-06-26 18:57 | commented | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | No | ||
| 4 | 2025-06-26 22:42 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Map updated following survey - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168160007 | ||
| 350851 | 1 | 2015-04-20 23:45 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331316420 seems not to have a main tag on it. If it's a fence, I'd expect it to be a "barrier=fence" (and not to have a name - fences tend not to have). Or is it the building of a cmpany that makes electric fences? | |
| 2 | 2025-02-07 18:25 | closed | Hulu12 | |||
| 3 | 2025-02-10 16:09 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-02-10 16:10 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The issue with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331316420 in the data remains - maybe it should be deleted now? | ||
| 5 | 2025-06-22 13:55 | commented | Thingummy ♦157 | There is another triangle of the same just north west. Teamscape does management courses from the nearby Highgate house. I think someone was trying to mark out their property and dragging nodes accidentally. I'd just delete them . I've added amenity=events_venue; name-Teamscapes near Highgate house named Teamscapes so the location won't be lost. Your choice. | ||
| 6 | 2025-06-23 18:51 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Thanks - I've deleted this one in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168017303 | ||
| 4803182 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-12 18:15 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | but is it art? via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/284009.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-13 00:37 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/284009.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12911584581 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12911584582 | ||
| 4794536 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-07 17:06 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | footpath is actually north of fmr railway, just s of fence via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/282885.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-07 23:55 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/282885.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1082144239 | ||
| 4794621 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-07 18:11 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | askrigg woodhall aysgarth via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/282894.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-07 23:24 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/282894.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12895853045 | ||
| 4794494 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-07 16:40 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Lady Annes Way via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/282877.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-07 23:20 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/282877.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12895840865 | ||
| 4785718 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-01 17:21 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Line of hunting blinds via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281772.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 18:12 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/281772.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887260183 | ||
| 4785595 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-01 16:17 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | mosaic via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281760.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 18:10 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/281760.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887257559 | ||
| 4785876 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-01 19:00 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 5 via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281798.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 18:05 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/281798.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887261051 | ||
| 4785878 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-01 19:01 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | An "unclassified highway" designation is correct I think here . via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281799.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 18:03 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/281799.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292697662 | ||
| 4785927 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-01 19:37 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | remains of former road surface via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281802.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 18:01 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/281802.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382744027 | ||
| 4788952 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-03 20:00 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Yoredale sticker via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/282114.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 17:49 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/282114.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9420518172 | ||
| 305651 | 1 | 2015-01-22 18:06 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | "RAF Nocton Hall (disused)" (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2004870658) has been added as a locality here, which makes no sense. Logically the name belongs as an old_name on an area around the former RAF Nocton Hall, but how far does that extend? Also, are the buildings here really connected as mapped? It seems unlikely. It should be possible to check from the bridleway to the south or the footpath to the east. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:22 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-06-01 22:03 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2004870658 has been deleted | ||
| 3665347 | 1 | 2023-04-29 09:53 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137088710 is a footway in the middle of a cycle route. It has no access tags on it. This seems unlikely and corresponds to a gap in the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/61713#map=19/52.71673/-1.53354 . | |
| 2 | 2025-06-01 21:57 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Fixed now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137088710/history | ||
| 4784316 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-31 22:26 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54969892 still open, and if it is, what is it best tagged as? | |
| 370817 | 1 | 2015-05-27 11:50 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | A previous anonymous note had said "The Dresser" | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:38 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-31 13:11 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 382344 | 1 | 2015-06-18 21:07 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | It looks from OOC maps and imagery that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3465698793 is actually misplaced, and that it's actually to the north of here (with the enclosure being approximately here). | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:39 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-31 13:10 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4782059 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-30 15:16 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | CW rm via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281334.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 00:23 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/281334.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12876254497 | ||
| 4782094 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-30 15:31 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Todmorden Centenery Way Link via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281338.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 00:21 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12876319382 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/281338.jpg | ||
| 4782273 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-30 16:59 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | pbetc via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281375.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 00:18 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/281375.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12876276930 | ||
| 4782292 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-30 17:05 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | pb gp tcl rm cw rm cwl rm n via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281380.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 00:14 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12876293327 | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-31 00:14 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-05-31 00:14 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/281380.jpg | ||
| 4782383 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-30 17:59 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | and the pictures forthatnote via StreetComplete 61.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/281388.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/281389.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-30 23:59 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/281388.jpg https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/281389.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40850636 | ||
| 4782382 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-30 17:58 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Site of a complaint in 2009 that"you can't possibly cycle here". via StreetComplete 61.1 | |
| 2 | 2025-05-30 23:57 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Actually - might not have been exactly here | ||
| 400221 | 1 | 2015-07-21 00:16 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The paths and tracks here all need a proper survey - they appear to have been very crudely traced and don't have GPS traces in OSM to back them up. Need to check access, since at least some of the forest here is clearly marked as private. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:40 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 400227 | 1 | 2015-07-21 00:32 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | If http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355322130 exists, what are the access rights? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:40 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 408732 | 1 | 2015-08-04 12:33 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | It's possible but unlikely, but I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38424181/history doesn't really have a _name_ of Stepping Stones. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:40 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-06-02 23:14 | commented | ceirios ♦1,604 | I don't think this is a name but rather it probably came from a series of mistakes while tagging it seems like it was given "name=stepping_stones", removed and then added back in after as "name=Stepping Stones" by the same user i'd also probably expect to see a name:cy of some form in this location. | ||
| 4722880 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-22 15:23 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Press reports suggest that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/27475944 is reopening soon as a Wetherspoon's. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 13:39 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | "Soon" is apparently now "before December 2025", so not really something to keep a wether (sorry) eye on. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:37 | closed | Taya_S | This note should be closed then. | ||
| 4 | 2025-05-29 23:44 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 372667 | 1 | 2015-05-31 13:58 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341463517 part of the same garage as the building next door? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:38 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:44 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 372675 | 1 | 2015-05-31 14:17 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The path at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342275025#map=16/52.8129/-1.6153&layers=N also doesn't join anything | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:38 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:44 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-07-02 17:44 | commented | myfanwy ♦3,011 | it appears to continue S along the river bank | ||
| 5 | 2025-07-02 18:47 | commented | myfanwy ♦3,011 | extended and joined | ||
| 6 | 2025-07-02 18:47 | closed | myfanwy ♦3,011 | |||
| 373250 | 1 | 2015-06-01 12:03 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Does http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3392408789 actually exist? It seems to be between the road and the buildings. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:39 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:44 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 374144 | 1 | 2015-06-03 11:52 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3209518773 here needs some sort of main tag. Perhaps amenity=childcare? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:39 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:43 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 396705 | 1 | 2015-07-15 11:31 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30916039 really called "The Big Track / Nottingham Canal Towpath"? Is "The Big Track" perhaps a route relation that this is part of and "Nottingham Canal Towpath" perhaps merely a description, in which case no name at all would be correct? | |
| 2 | 2015-07-15 13:44 | commented | SK53 ♦3,851 | Yes, exactly. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:39 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 4 | 2025-05-29 23:43 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 394716 | 1 | 2015-07-12 10:50 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | A cycleway=track extends on the south side west from here, but for how far? | |
| 2 | 2015-07-12 10:58 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Not west - east! | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:39 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 4 | 2025-05-29 23:43 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 402115 | 1 | 2015-07-23 23:29 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | This area looks like it would benefit from a survey to see how http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166056081 interacts with the track here. The imagery suggests that they share share a common part. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:40 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:43 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 408464 | 1 | 2015-08-03 17:36 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | From the road and recent works it looks like the Derwent Aqueduct runs north-south here. What's the evidence for the easterly location ay http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2138163575 | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:40 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:43 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 401915 | 1 | 2015-07-23 14:36 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Footpath http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355307600 needs a survey; it's rather crudely drawn and there's no idea currently how it crosses the stream here, for example. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:40 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:42 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 121489 | 1 | 2014-02-20 01:41 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I'm guessing that what there actually is here apart from separate road, cycleway and footpath in the middle of a field is a road with a segregated cycleway on the southern side (perhaps cycleway=track; segregated=yes)? | |
| 2 | 2014-08-17 19:40 | commented | --- | Yes, but one has to cross the road at a blind bend to get to it when going west-east. | ||
| 3 | 2015-04-24 09:40 | commented | --- | What a bizarre piece of cycling infrastructure this is. | ||
| 4 | 2015-04-24 11:05 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | It's going to need a local to action the note (either fix OSM to be "more correct" or just close the note if things really are as bizarre as suggested above) | ||
| 5 | 2015-07-25 13:51 | commented | CrimsonCaribou ♦133 | Its a footpath by the side of the road which is segregated for cycles and pedestrians. I've removed the footpath and made the cycleway tagged as segregated. | ||
| 6 | 2025-05-29 23:40 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 7 | 2025-05-29 23:42 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 400224 | 1 | 2015-07-21 00:24 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355320341 needs a proper survey to see if it actually exists, and if so what the access rights along it are. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:40 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:42 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 400223 | 1 | 2015-07-21 00:22 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355310185 needs a survey to see if it actually exists, and isn't just a bunch of Strava users taking an illegal shortcut across a field. If it does exist, what are the access rights? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:40 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:42 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 396759 | 1 | 2015-07-15 12:59 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Lots of untagged stuff has been traced here, often with a "name" that helps identify it. In the case of the Vampire, there was a mailing list thread a bit back about tagging gate guardians that might help with what to tag it as. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:39 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:42 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 382332 | 1 | 2015-06-18 20:30 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/30000436/history here needs checking, I think. On various OOC maps there's a "Brown Low" tumulus to the southeast and a peak of a different name to the north - needs a proper survey. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:39 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:42 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 400188 | 1 | 2015-07-20 21:14 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I'm guessing that the footpath merely forms part of the Jurassic Way here and isn't actually _called_ that (that at least is the case for the sections to the south). The former Great Central Railway also appears to be slightly misaligned, and what remains of the bridge infrastructure is yet to be mapped. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:39 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:42 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 385790 | 1 | 2015-06-24 11:29 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221607868/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144869027/history are duplicates here. Needs a proper survey to see what really exists, and also to see whether http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355322128 really exists as a path or is just a shortcut that a Strava user took once. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 23:39 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:42 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 386484 | 1 | 2015-06-25 14:59 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Does http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307485650/history really exist? It seems unlikely that it is building=house and natural=water | |
| 2 | 2015-06-26 20:11 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | For a bit more info (including a photo of the area!) see the link here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31222328 | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-29 23:39 | closed | Taya_S | |||
| 4 | 2025-05-29 23:41 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 715154 | 1 | 2016-09-16 20:55 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Both Hall Grove School http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24259311/history and Hall Grove Farm http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3672043470/history need looking at here. The "Farm" doesn't look like a farm on the imagery; is the industrial area underneath really still called that? The "School" looks too big and seems to include the industrial area? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 15:36 | commented | marsbar28 ♦350 | School outline has been updated since this note and seems alright now. Name is at location on OS OpenData StreetView but on OS OpenMap Local in different location (probably once a farm but then turned into an industrial area). | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-24 09:52 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The industrial area is now industrial in OSM too. | ||
| 268067 | 1 | 2014-11-09 12:48 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is this bridge (or any remains of it) still here? I mapped it originally, but since the nature reserve creation to the west there's little left of the former railway. Needs checking here, and also at the Hillsway Crescent crossing to the northeast. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:19 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-05-21 14:48 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | happy to say from current sat image this is now gone? | ||
| 5 | 2025-05-23 13:34 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The bridge was actually deleted from OSM 5 years ago - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30252599/history . (overpass of that area from 2014 https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/24HM ) | ||
| 1324591 | 1 | 2018-03-11 23:11 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is the Oddfellows still open? It didn't look it back in February | |
| 2 | 2019-07-23 20:26 | commented | --- | Oddfellows has now shut down | ||
| 3 | 2019-07-23 22:18 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Oddly its social pages still need to be active - will need to check. | ||
| 4 | 2025-05-21 14:45 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/local-news/former-nottinghamshire-pub-significant-state-4795658 likely now gone | ||
| 5 | 2025-05-23 13:21 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Esri imagery shows the pub demolished and cars parked here . Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166656440 | ||
| 4771013 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-22 15:15 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | millennium way circular walk 16 via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/279631.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 09:49 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/279631.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12857122624 | ||
| 4767230 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-19 19:20 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | and another via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/279122.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 09:40 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/279122.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12857170650 | ||
| 4767224 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-19 19:18 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | ure walks through time via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/279121.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 09:37 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/279121.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9401354640 | ||
| 4768713 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-20 19:32 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | The ncn65 marker, at a nice time of day :) via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/279244.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 09:33 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/279244.jpg | ||
| 4770987 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-22 14:54 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | dhw gp n via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/279618.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 09:30 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/279618.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12857131509 | ||
| 4770994 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-22 14:58 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | dhw brad mill way via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/279619.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 09:27 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/279619.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12857105238 | ||
| 4771004 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-22 15:08 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | stone via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/279628.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 09:23 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/279628.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12857127273 | ||
| 4771012 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-22 15:13 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | welcome way yorkshire heritage way www.yorkshireheritage.org.uk via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/279630.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 09:19 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/279630.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12857122624 | ||
| 4771017 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-22 15:17 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | dhw etc via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/279632.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 09:09 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/279632.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12857098252 | ||
| 4771077 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-22 16:19 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | restricted open access land via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/279655.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 09:03 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/279655.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12857091770 | ||
| 4771079 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-22 16:20 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | access land pf ww bm dhw ww via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/279656.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/279657.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 09:00 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/279656.jpg https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/279657.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12857090033 | ||
| 4760750 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-15 14:45 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | combined bridge long ford thing via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278298.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 22:22 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/278298.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1387097962 | ||
| 4760636 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-15 13:46 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | bridge and long ford via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278285.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 22:17 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/278285.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1387097711 | ||
| 4757356 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-13 19:33 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Youlton 1.4 km pb Ncn65 via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/277941.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 22:09 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/277941.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11297762449 | ||
| 4297666 | 1 | 2024-06-18 20:54 | opened | bompstable ♦20 | Unable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" – Rabbit Food (Cafe) – https://osm.org/node/2896421670 via StreetComplete 58.0: Not sure if this here. Sign says Millers Yard and does mention a cafe | |
| 2 | 2025-05-11 22:36 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2896421670 - I think it's just a "rentable cafe area" now. | ||
| 4214891 | 1 | 2024-04-25 17:26 | opened | bompstable ♦20 | Unable to answer "What’s the topic of this information board?" – Clifton Ings Flood Alleviation Scheme (Information Board) – https://osm.org/node/11148469417 via StreetComplete 57.2: See photo. Clifton Ings Flood Alleviation Scheme. There is also a cycle path finger post next to it. Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/208644.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-11 22:31 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Photo saved as https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/208644.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11148469417 | ||
| 3868289 | 1 | 2023-09-03 07:40 | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,045 | name=Geoffrey Benson and Son https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6662822520 shop=homewares ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhouseware ? If yes, what is the difference? Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-11 22:27 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Someone changed back in 2023. | ||
| 2714369 | 1 | 2021-06-15 11:26 | opened | 10992 ♦748 | Unable to answer "What is the name of this bus stop?" for https://osm.org/node/3906826932 via StreetComplete 32.1: no signed name | |
| 2 | 2025-05-11 22:24 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | NaPTAN have https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3906826932 as a customery (no pole) stop named "The Village Hall", which is fair enough. | ||
| 2714318 | 1 | 2021-06-15 10:25 | opened | 10992 ♦748 | trees along most or all of path via StreetComplete 32.1 | |
| 2 | 2021-06-15 20:54 | commented | 10992 ♦748 | these should be added, not yet done | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-11 22:15 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Yes - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385662519 etc. | ||
| 2714321 | 1 | 2021-06-15 10:27 | opened | 10992 ♦748 | moorings via StreetComplete 32.1 | |
| 2 | 2025-05-11 22:15 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Yes - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9825403060 | ||
| 4754146 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-11 18:39 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | WoR, 65, signed left via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/277484.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-11 21:42 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/277484.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12829233347 | ||
| 4754161 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-11 18:47 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 65 WoR signed here, but note that old signage past the Yorkshire Green site entrance is also still present via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/277499.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-11 21:39 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/277499.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12829216631 | ||
| 4750197 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-09 16:05 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 6 miles via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/276819.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-09 23:57 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/276819.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12824751803 | ||
| 4750393 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-09 17:24 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Marsden Walkers are Welcome Intake Head via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/276850.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-09 23:55 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/276850.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12824610566 | ||
| 4750406 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-09 17:30 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | The Standedge Trail RM via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/276855.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-09 23:53 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/276855.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12824741494 | ||
| 4750412 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-09 17:31 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Marsden Walkers are Welcome Swellands RM via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/276857.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-09 23:51 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/276857.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12824745139 | ||
| 4750434 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-09 17:48 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | man v barge rm via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/276858.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-09 23:49 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/276858.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12824745805 | ||
| 4750437 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-09 17:49 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | waw (unlabelled) 2 other ? rm via StreetComplete 61.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/276859.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-09 23:47 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/276859.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12824745805 | ||
| 4225872 | 1 | 2024-05-02 11:35 | opened | bompstable ♦20 | This does not exist. Dup of the nearby gate node that was a stile - shown in picture? via StreetComplete 57.3 Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/210097.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 18:24 | commented | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Indeed there is no second gate. Somewhat surprisingly, the Yoredale Way sticker is still there. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/275782.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/275783.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/275784.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-04 20:17 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/210097.jpg https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/275782.jpg https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/275783.jpg https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/275784.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9773411083 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11194785280 | ||
| 4742470 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-04 19:01 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Unorthodox dog gate - plank swings to one side to let gnasher through. via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/275788.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 20:07 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/275788.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9773329007 | ||
| 4742499 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-04 19:05 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | dog gate on a kissing gate via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/275790.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 20:02 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/275790.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/369313545 | ||
| 4740709 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-03 16:57 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | lp 24 civilisation 103.25 via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/275531.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 11:44 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/275531.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12809382023 | ||
| 4740657 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-03 16:45 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Rufford Branch sign via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/275524.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 11:38 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/275524.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12809365987 | ||
| 4740537 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-05-03 15:48 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | lp 25 l 102.25 via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/275501.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 11:32 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/275501.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12809375438 | ||
| 4730869 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-27 17:46 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | closed northbound via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/274313.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 11:27 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/274313.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383527773 Closed north due to landslip until at least 10th June 2025 | ||
| 4730851 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-27 17:35 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | guidepost via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/274312.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 11:20 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/274312.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8773985290 In spite of the "Bilton Lane FP" south sign, I suspect that this is actually southwest of here, not west. https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#16/54.0171/-1.5290/H/P suggests no PF due south of here. | ||
| 4730805 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-27 17:16 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | guidepost via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/274300.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 11:08 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/274300.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12809299925 | ||
| 3928160 | 1 | 2023-10-07 08:32 | opened | ElectricDuck ♦154 | This carpark is now gone too | |
| 2 | 2024-03-31 10:03 | commented | eteb3 ♦1,009 | Tagged access=no for least intrusive edit If you know it will never return you could delete (it’s still there on the ground, as far as I can recall from a walk past not looking very closely: used for construction traffic/ aggregate dumps, I think?) | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-02 22:26 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Car park has also been deleted from OSM now. | ||
| 4602879 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-26 15:37 | opened | --- | Spring Lane car park | |
| 2 | 2025-05-02 22:19 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I've never heard it referred to as that (and was a regular user, many years ago) | ||
| 4546052 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-07 12:59 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Check the phone masts etc. here. The EE one https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10085838209 still exists. There's one by the "communications_transponder" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5587204812 . I don't believe that there is an O2 one by the new car park https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10085838208 . Has the O2 one moved north, and is the "communications_transponder" something different? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:13 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-04-28 21:19 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There are two masts outside the care home: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10085838209 (EE) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10085838208 (O2). Whatever https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5587204812/history is , it is not a massive mast. | ||
| 4727900 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-25 19:19 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | and the other side, clockwise from top right Silsden Circle 2016 unknown Silsden Strolls 1 via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/273732.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-04-26 00:15 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12787281844 | ||
| 4727898 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-25 19:17 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | clockwise from right: no idea silsden circle 2015 Millennium Way Circular Walk 12 Please clean up after your dog Millennium Way Circular Walk (PF) via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/273731.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-04-26 00:13 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/273731.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/273732.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12787281844 | ||
| 4727884 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-25 19:10 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Bradford Millennium Way e https://aireriverstrust.org.uk/downloadable-riverside-walks-along-the-river-aire/ via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/273729.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-04-26 00:02 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/273729.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12787267824 | ||
| 4358637 | 1 | 2024-07-30 12:50 | opened | AstraV ♦108 | Hi-Q needs removing, is just Moss now | |
| 2 | 2025-04-22 16:59 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Indeed - done. | ||
| 4722950 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-22 15:46 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Press reports suggest that the Bay Horse https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/403142963 (Sam Smith's) is currently closed. Needs checking. | |
| 4722948 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-22 15:45 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Press reports suggest that the Commercial https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447561012 is currently closed (Sam Smith's). Needs checking. | |
| 4722945 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-22 15:44 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Press reports suggest that the Crown Inn https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2526739347 (Sam Smith's) is currently closed. Needs checking. | |
| 4722933 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-22 15:38 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Press reports suggest that the Fox and Hounds https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/403137833 is currently closed (Sam Smith's). Needs checking. | |
| 4194722 | 1 | 2024-04-12 12:22 | opened | --- | ENDEAVOUR WHARF/SPS | |
| 2 | 2025-04-22 15:36 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I don't think that this note contains any actionable information? | ||
| 4722927 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-22 15:35 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Press reports suggest that the Golden Ball https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300027228 is currently closed (Sam Smith's). Needs checking. | |
| 4722902 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-22 15:32 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Press reports suggest that the Radcliffe Arms https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3902437920 is currently closed (Sam Smith's). Needs checking. | |
| 4722898 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-22 15:31 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Press reports suggest that the Railway Inn https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3903193697 is currently closed (Sam Smith's). Needs checking. | |
| 4052145 | 1 | 2024-01-03 23:49 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is the Cricketers https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300460790 still open? I did look open on a cold winter Wednesday evening, but didn't have the usual Sam Smiths "management couple wanted" signs in the windows. | |
| 2 | 2025-04-22 15:28 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Confirmed shut by me last year: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300460790/history . According to press reports Sam's are trying to find a management couple for it. | ||
| 4722885 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-22 15:24 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Press reports suggest that the Crown Inn https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/27476334/history is shortly to reopen - still Sam Smiths, so will need checking. | |
| 4722874 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-22 15:22 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Press reports suggest that the Sun Inn https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/685131729 has reopened again. Still Sam Smiths, so needs checking. | |
| 4719075 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-20 15:20 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | kr via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/272671.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-04-20 22:18 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/272671.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12771096087 | ||
| 4719174 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-20 15:58 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Knaresborough Round signage via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/272701.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-04-20 22:16 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/272701.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12771091505 | ||
| 4707528 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-12 17:54 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | vole raft? via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/271028.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-04-20 21:26 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/271028.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12771035027 | ||
| 4111892 | 1 | 2024-02-13 20:34 | opened | --- | There have been local press reports of a couple of fires here and apparently it's shut Needs checking to see what the current status is and if/when it changes. | |
| 2 | 2024-02-13 20:35 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/375975754 of course | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-20 16:18 | commented | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Now open | ||
| 4 | 2025-04-20 16:38 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4640303 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | 2025-02-24 15:57 | opened | mark255 ♦10 | Jane Plum store has permanently closed. #OsmAnd | |
| 2 | 2025-04-19 15:00 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Indeed it has. | ||
| 3991864 | 1 | 2023-11-18 04:46 | opened | MyyOpenStreetMap | The section of towpath from Lock 4 east, Longroyd Bridge to Bridge 30, Mark Bottom Road Bridge will be closed due to an unstable wall that may pose a risk to towpath users. | |
| 2 | 2023-11-18 04:46 | commented | MyyOpenStreetMap | Here's the link to the Canals and Rivers Trust statement: https://canalrivertrust.org.uk/notices/24004-towpath-closure-lock-4-east-longroyd-bridge-to-bridge-30-mark-bottom-road-bridge | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-11 23:08 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The sign advertising the closure is displayed at the western end. Any signage at the eastern end and the remains of a gate have been removed (presumably by locals, not CaRT). The closure is completely ignored. I've added a note to the affected section. | ||
| 4704463 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-04-10 17:46 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 1 mile 1843 via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/270570.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-04-11 14:22 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/270570.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12747977148 | ||
| 4689322 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-30 18:50 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Hurrah! Posh new signpost. Boo! No longer has an Ebor Way sign on it. via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/268455.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-04-11 14:18 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/268455.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8892773123 | ||
| 4607601 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-30 12:46 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There's a gap here that suggests that it it is impossible to get from the pavement of King Street to Delce Road, and also a gap in the walking route https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8864#map=20/51.3839193/0.5077964&layers=H . I'm guessing that in reality this isn't blocked, even if there is a kerb in the way? | |
| 2 | 2025-04-08 13:50 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,400 | It looks like @Mex fixed this by adding crossings in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161941328 | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-08 20:48 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Yes - thanks! | ||
| 3159395 | 1 | 2022-04-30 12:14 | opened | --- | onosm.org submitted note from a business: name: The 13AR phone: 07895237365 website: twitter: facebook: email: leonspencer457@gmail.com hours: Thursday to Sunday 5-2:30 category: Bars address: 13 A the butts ol161es | |
| 2 | 2025-04-03 00:25 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I don't remember this - maybe it's closed or been renamed? | ||
| 4107503 | 1 | 2024-02-10 19:56 | opened | ubegxj ♦107 | Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – house number 37 – https://osm.org/way/155597656 via StreetComplete 56.1: Hello Student - Samuel Tuke Apartments | |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 16:31 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The Samuel Tuke Apartments are already mapped | ||
| 4289108 | 1 | 2024-06-12 16:50 | opened | itspaulkelly ♦20 | Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – The Woolpack Inn – https://osm.org/node/264098392 via StreetComplete 58.0: Now residential | |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 16:29 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Yes, it's been closed for ages | ||
| 4278743 | 1 | 2024-06-04 16:00 | opened | --- | Piece Hall Stage | |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 16:28 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I suspect it depends; I seem to remember that the last time I was there it was in a different corner? It's not a permanent fixture, though. | ||
| 3748132 | 1 | 2023-06-23 19:56 | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,685 | All M&Co stores have closed. | |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 16:26 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | It's shown as vacant in OSM. | ||
| 3294872 | 1 | 2022-08-01 22:24 | opened | WutheringDepths | To reach the canal towpath with a bicycle, cross the bridge and follow the track to the left to the lock. There you can cross the upper lock gate to access the towpath towards Brighouse. | |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 16:26 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I've added the steps (which presumably is what prompted this note) at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/988836007 . | ||
| 3298697 | 1 | 2022-08-04 11:06 | opened | WutheringDepths | Not sure if I've already flagged this up but I saw no trace of a path across this field - marked 'private' - to the river. I also suspect the 'river path' here may be almost non-existent. Everyone heading to or from Brighouse leaves/joins the waterside path at the stone bridge by the second lock. I recently added a path, leading to the lock on the far side of that bridge, that makes getting a bicycle onto/off the towpath a lot easier. | |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 16:23 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I was there yesterday - the "from the railway to the canal" part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327507523 looks informal but quite well-used. The "along the canal" part looks less well used (I didn't use it because it looked like I'd have to fight my way through shrubbery). I'll update in a few days or so when I upload everything. | ||
| 3158726 | 1 | 2022-04-29 20:03 | opened | Paul Berry ♦2,090 | Path appears to simply end here. Check if it joins up. | |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 16:16 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I was there yesterday (on the other side of the river), and am pretty sure that there's no way through past the apartments. | ||
| 3070356 | 1 | 2022-03-02 08:14 | opened | DzmitryBachkarou | Maybe someone please check the possibility of movement in this place. The driver reported that he could not drive from High Street to south on service rd. #mbx_uk_editing | |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 16:14 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Road geometry was modified by Apple a couple of years ago https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577488671 | ||
| 4603554 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-27 10:06 | opened | --- | Typo: should be "Coffee Kiosk". Actually, it is the old toll house. | |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 16:11 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164294379 | ||
| 4658942 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-10 11:15 | opened | --- | Anvil Apartments | |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 16:08 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164294216 | ||
| 4688014 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-29 22:02 | opened | Rexburr | This yellow part of Clifton lane between the roundabout under the A453 to the mini roundabout leading to the A52 is called the A453 Eastbound by the National Highways on 2 of their brochures when doing alterations in 2019 and 2023 and is a primary road part of their Strategic Road Network. | |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 15:41 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I've done this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164292673 - hope all is now OK. | ||
| 4687686 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-29 16:57 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | From Fall Ing (sp) 12 miles via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/268210.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-29 22:36 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/268210.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12710783522 | ||
| 4687610 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-29 16:14 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 1 - 2 via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/268194.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-29 22:24 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/268194.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12710744153 | ||
| 4687609 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-29 16:14 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 100 yds via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/268193.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-29 22:23 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/268193.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12710744152 | ||
| 4687585 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-29 16:03 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | LY B (not sure what it is a marker of) via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/268186.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-29 22:18 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/268186.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12710756782 | ||
| 3854000 | 1 | 2023-08-26 05:44 | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,045 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4114880552/history is this shop really selling water? | |
| 2 | 2025-03-29 02:05 | closed | GeorgeLA672_ ♦1 | Shops will do anything for a quick buck. | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-29 12:11 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-10-26 21:32 | closed | ICT_maps ♦3,156 | appears so on streetside. Some places have various reasons people don't want to drink from the tap. | ||
| 4671584 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-19 16:15 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | a pole via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/266350.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-27 23:28 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/266350.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12706111040 | ||
| 4671586 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-19 16:18 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | a pole - or is it? via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/266351.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-27 23:25 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/266351.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12706107253 | ||
| 4673024 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-20 15:22 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | gp Pennine Bridleway Settle 3/4 Settle Loop Long Preston 2 3/4 rm Pennine Bridleway National Trail via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/266466.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-27 23:19 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/266466.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11067653298 | ||
| 4684843 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-27 16:34 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Teesdale Way to Yarm 1 1/4 miles e Teesdale Way Middleton-One-Row 6 miles No exit route for 3 miles w Aislaby n via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/267806.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-27 23:15 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/267806.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12706064461 | ||
| 4684905 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-27 17:18 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | SOURCE SA?L TO via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/267824.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/267825.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-27 23:08 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/267824.jpg https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/267825.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12706083600 See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12706083599 (the other gatepost) | ||
| 4684873 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-27 16:57 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | SWIMTO THESEA via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/267815.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/267816.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-27 23:04 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/267815.jpg https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/267816.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12706083599 See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12706083600 (the other gatepost) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12706044095 (the Teesdale Way route marker) | ||
| 4684867 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-27 16:53 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Teesdale Way RM via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/267814.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-27 23:00 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/267814.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12706044095 | ||
| 4684834 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-27 16:31 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Seal? via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/267805.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-27 22:55 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/267805.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12706065436 | ||
| 4672917 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-20 14:16 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Pennine Bridleway Settle 5 via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/266456.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-20 23:50 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/266456.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6612884479 | ||
| 4672861 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-20 13:31 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | pb via StreetComplete 60.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/266449.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-20 23:28 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/266449.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12685913281 | ||
| 4120919 | 1 | 2024-02-20 15:32 | opened | AwayTeam ♦489 | Mapping via StreetComplete 56.1 GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AwayTeam/traces/11290941 | |
| 2 | 2024-04-20 07:28 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | This note is at the exact same coordinates as https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4137770 so shows up as a duplicate - are you able to map your GPS / steps? | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-19 13:18 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Closed because the duplicate has the word steps in it, and this does not. | ||
| 2055328 | 1 | 2020-01-12 22:31 | opened | --- | onosm.org submitted note from a business: name: Monty’s Parlour phone: 07866602715 website: twitter: undefined hours: category: ,Dessert Shops address: S64 8AE Swinton Rowms Lane | |
| 2 | 2025-03-01 14:21 | commented | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | signed on Swinton Yard | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-15 00:19 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Added as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12663680310 | ||
| 4650064 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-03 17:08 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | pf s on f 3/4 n, rudcarr lane 1/4 w via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/263725.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-15 00:14 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12663629917 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/263725.jpg | ||
| 4651277 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-04 16:08 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | PF, route marker via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/263885.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-15 00:08 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5198407480 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/263885.jpg | ||
| 4664381 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-14 17:47 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Garstang 15 via StreetComplete 60.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/265381.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-15 00:06 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12663641078 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/265381.jpg | ||
| 4664308 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-14 16:57 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Preston 2 1819 2019 via StreetComplete 60.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/265378.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-15 00:06 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/265378.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12663641078 | ||
| 4664391 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-14 17:57 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Cadley Catfirth 6.25, Garstang 15.5 Haslam Park 0.25 Hope? over Bridge Canal Terminus 0.75 Preston Town Centre 1.25? via StreetComplete 60.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/265382.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-03-15 00:00 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/265382.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12663662734 | ||
| 4647843 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-02 13:53 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is the spelling of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150653598 correct, or should it be "Anchorage"? | |
| 4636155 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-21 16:03 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | wobbly bridge via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261628.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-28 21:32 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680992413 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/261628.jpg | ||
| 4644216 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-27 15:33 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | lp35 l 92.25 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/262875.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-28 21:30 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626481213 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/262875.jpg | ||
| 1974235 | 1 | 2019-10-25 19:03 | opened | RedRocker87 ♦22 | Added Canoe Trail Waymarker from local knowledge. There will be more across the country but I'm not sure where. Info: https://canalrivertrust.org.uk/news-and-views/news/new-canalside-hub-launched-for-young-people-in-wigan | |
| 2 | 2025-02-27 15:37 | commented | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | pic Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/262876.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-28 21:16 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6916657004 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/262876.jpg | ||
| 4 | 2025-02-28 21:23 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There are a few more of these across the Leeds / Liverpool and further east. I know of a picture of another one at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11950854840 . CaRT's own news page about it has died, but another is https://www.canalboat.co.uk/news/leeds-liverpool-canal-canoes-meet-to-mark-trail-completion-6304986/ . For the other one that I added I used "tourism=artwork". I think (once more are mapped) it would make sense to add them to a "Desmond Family Canoe Trail" route relation (either of the constituent relations or ways, or perhaps just the nodes). | ||
| 4644241 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-27 15:51 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | l 93.25 lp34 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/262878.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-28 21:12 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4619357605 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/262878.jpg | ||
| 4644345 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-27 17:10 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | l95.25 lp32 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/262890.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-28 21:01 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626408239 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/262890.jpg | ||
| 4644358 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-27 17:31 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | l96 25 lp31 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/262891.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-28 20:58 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626408236 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/262891.jpg | ||
| 4644380 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-27 17:42 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 1/2 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/262904.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-28 20:55 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626405095 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/262904.jpg | ||
| 4644389 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-27 17:51 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | lp 30 l 97.25 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/262905.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-28 20:52 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626432042 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/262905.jpg | ||
| 4644408 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-27 18:01 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 1/2 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/262912.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-28 20:47 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626416663 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/262912.jpg | ||
| 4644419 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-27 18:11 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | l98.25 lp29 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/262913.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-28 20:43 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626406032 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/262913.jpg | ||
| 4644423 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-27 18:16 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | blank via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/262914.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-28 20:40 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626377554 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/262914.jpg | ||
| 4644426 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-27 18:21 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 1/2 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/262915.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-28 20:37 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626405292 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/262915.jpg | ||
| 4644437 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-27 18:31 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 99.25 28 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/262917.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-28 20:34 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626407543 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/262917.jpg | ||
| 4645568 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-28 16:53 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | No Unsuitable sign pointing west, but one pointing south via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/263104.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/263105.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-28 20:06 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/263104.jpg https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/263105.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626336200 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626377501 | ||
| 4633686 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-19 16:36 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Pf Common Lane 1.25 e, pb Stockton on the Forest .5 n, jorvic way rm pb sw via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261378.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-20 23:39 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/261378.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3440993359 | ||
| 4633711 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-19 16:43 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | pf common lane 1.25 e, pb n via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261379.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-20 23:36 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/261379.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8766205783 | ||
| 4635022 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-20 15:44 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | liverpool 42 miles via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261486.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-20 23:30 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/261486.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12605405380 | ||
| 4635039 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-20 16:03 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | liverpool 41 miles via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261489.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-20 23:27 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/261489.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12605422932 | ||
| 4635063 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-20 16:24 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | liverpool 40 miles via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261492.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-20 23:24 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/261492.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10122858447 | ||
| 4635068 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-20 16:33 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | ll canal signpost via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261496.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-20 23:22 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/261496.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10798260509 | ||
| 4635104 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-20 17:03 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Wigan Way GP via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261499.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-20 23:19 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/261499.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11036083707 | ||
| 4635107 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-20 17:05 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | LLCC via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261500.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-20 23:17 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/261500.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12605413502 | ||
| 4635110 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-20 17:10 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | lp 38 l 89.25 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261503.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-20 23:14 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/261503.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10122858446 | ||
| 4635119 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-20 17:28 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Grrr Bark Woof via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261505.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-20 23:11 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/261505.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12605363097 | ||
| 4635120 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-20 17:30 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | lp 37 l 90.25 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261506.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-20 23:08 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/261506.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10122858445 | ||
| 4635139 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-20 17:50 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | lp 36 l 91.25 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261508.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-20 23:05 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10122858444 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/261508.jpg | ||
| 4617157 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-06 12:54 | opened | GovernorKeagan ♦84 | Safari childcare | |
| 2 | 2025-02-16 11:02 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Looks like it's now been mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57824467 | ||
| 4611585 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-02 16:29 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Cleveland Way, Carlton Bank 3.5 miles, PF via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/259425.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-15 23:20 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6745757615 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/259425.jpg | ||
| 4611570 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-02 16:18 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Cleveland Way via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/259417.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-15 22:58 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6747185118 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/259417.jpg | ||
| 191844 | 1 | 2014-06-29 21:43 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is there a bus stop pole or sign present here? I don't remember seeing one. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:16 | closed | OsmZuzy | Yes | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-02-12 16:42 | commented | Tristan Scott ♦328 | but stop shelter on the corner of st Lawrence view but no pole. no bench. | ||
| 5 | 2025-02-15 12:34 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Thanks - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162534533 | ||
| 4623351 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-11 19:00 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There's a gap in the Teesdale Way at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/957011#map=19/54.485713/-1.501708&layers=N . Does anyone know how it connects here? | |
| 4623348 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-11 18:56 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There's a gap in the Teesdale Way at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/957011#map=17/54.544006/-1.929340 / Does anyone know what route it currently takes there? | |
| 2 | 2025-10-25 13:06 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦849 | Yes, there really is a gap. The signposts send you up to Flatts Road and don't resume until the other side of Barnard Castle. I think it's because the path just here is permissive not a PRoW. | ||
| 2465088 | 1 | 2020-12-17 15:08 | opened | Pavel Chyzhonak | Can somebody from locals check this road for restrictions? Drivers couldn’t get there | |
| 2 | 2021-12-30 15:41 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Couldn't you ask your driver what the restrictions were? Also "couldn’t get there" doesn't really help - couldn’t get to where, from where, in what vehicle? | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-10 22:24 | closed | tia06 | |||
| 4 | 2025-02-10 22:24 | reopened | tia06 | |||
| 5 | 2025-02-10 22:59 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Pavel%20Chyzhonak hasn't been an active account for a couple of years, so it probably makes sense to just resolve this note now. | ||
| 345776 | 1 | 2015-04-11 13:47 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is there public access west and then south from here? | |
| 2 | 2025-02-07 18:25 | closed | Hulu12 | |||
| 3 | 2025-02-10 16:14 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-02-10 16:16 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Note question unresolved, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/719083351 et al have been added since this note was added. | ||
| 348024 | 1 | 2015-04-15 12:57 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The imagery suggests that this is more of a track than a path. Also, what are the access rights along it? | |
| 2 | 2025-02-07 18:25 | closed | Hulu12 | |||
| 3 | 2025-02-10 16:12 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-02-10 16:13 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Updated to track based on aerial imagery in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162357526 . | ||
| 4611666 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-02 17:59 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | About 2 years ago, a StreetComplete 50.2 user was unable to answer a "How many steps are here?" question about the stile https://osm.org/node/937654215 . They said "No steps just a slope!", which suggests that they might have been answering a slightly different question (there are apparently some steps north of the railway, but not south of it). Perhaps some local could count the steps on the stile and close this note? I'm creating a separate note here because a Korean spammer added something rather inappropriate to the original (now hidden) note. | |
| 110227 | 1 | 2014-01-30 21:07 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | As per http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/110226 this didn't look like an unclassified road when I was last here. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:17 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-02-02 13:59 | commented | Malcolm Boura ♦36 | It is listed as a highway maintainable at public expense. | ||
| 5 | 2025-02-02 14:38 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Thanks | ||
| 110226 | 1 | 2014-01-30 21:06 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | This definitely didn't look like an unclassified road the last time that I was here. It was a service road to a farm, and didn't look like it was council-maintained. Has this status changed? I don't see any extra underlying GPS traces, suggesting that a survey hasn't happened, and someone's just guessing. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:17 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-02-02 13:59 | commented | Malcolm Boura ♦36 | It is listed as a highway maintainable at public expense. | ||
| 5 | 2025-02-02 14:38 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Thanks | ||
| 4592074 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-17 17:06 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | oldham way pf via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/257596.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-31 23:57 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12547881595 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/257596.jpg | ||
| 4607900 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-30 16:16 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | virtually illegible via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/258965.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-31 23:52 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/762138831 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/258965.jpg | ||
| 4607959 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-30 17:01 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 65 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/258967.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-31 23:50 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/258967.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12547885522 | ||
| 4607962 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-30 17:05 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 65 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/258968.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-31 23:46 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/258968.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11112953532 | ||
| 4607964 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-30 17:05 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | 65 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/258969.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-31 23:42 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11112953536 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/258969.jpg | ||
| 4609015 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-31 15:12 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Lpool 45 l 82.25 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/259115.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-31 23:39 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12547795870 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/259115.jpg | ||
| 4609061 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-31 15:31 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | lpool 44 l 83.25 via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/259119.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-31 23:35 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/259119.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12547784053 | ||
| 4609084 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-31 15:46 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | adlington circular gp es via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/259121.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-31 23:31 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/259121.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12547840284 | ||
| 4609101 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-31 15:54 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | lp 43 l 84.25? pic via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/259122.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-31 23:27 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/259122.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12547865240 | ||
| 4609108 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-31 15:57 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | lancashire way rm via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/259123.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-31 23:22 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/259123.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12547788342 | ||
| 277315 | 1 | 2014-11-27 18:47 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Need to check how many of these footpaths (a) still exist and (b) are accessible to anything other than foot traffic. They've been recently changed from "footway" to "path" (by someone who usd to live around here) but I'm not 100% that cycle access is tolerated (foot access, from memory, is permissive - but that needs checking too as it's currently not mapped as such). Note - likely to be very muddy! | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:20 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 14:30 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | still construnction visible going on the current sat images, nothing clearly visible, still probably needs a survey | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-30 20:46 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Actually, ESRI seems more up to date here. That imagery suggests that something might follow the line of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115432100 , and according to https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#17/53.09399/-1.36745/H/P it might actually be a bridleway. Maybe it's signed as such now (it wasn't 10 years ago). There's still stuff to do here, though. | ||
| 6 | 2025-01-31 10:02 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | agreed, I think a survey will be best through, not enough info on the sat image. | ||
| 317035 | 1 | 2015-02-15 22:21 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190898036 here a building, and what's the housename? See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28314277 | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:23 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:27 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 15:00 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | removed building, no evidence of it, still a node here for a hairdressers in what looks like themiddle of the drive | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-30 20:38 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Thanks! | ||
| 4574742 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-03 18:53 | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,685 | Due to become a Go Outdoors https://www.timeout.com/uk/news/full-list-of-uk-high-street-closures-confirmed-in-2025-from-co-op-to-wh-smith-010325 | |
| 2 | 2025-01-24 19:29 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Signage up for Go Outdoors Express. Not open yet. | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 19:01 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Appears to be now open | ||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 20:26 | closed | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,685 | Thanks for updating. | ||
| 287651 | 1 | 2014-12-17 11:27 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The footpaths making up the "Leicester Round" LDP here all need a bit more survey (many seem to have come from NPE or worse). In particular, is there a bridge or tunnel here or just an at-grade crossing of the road? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:19 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 14:01 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | mapped as tunnel, but steps down to road level are visible on bing streetside image | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-30 14:07 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Thanks - I've commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123965431 , which introduced the tunnel. It also looks like an at-grade crossing to me based on the imagery. | ||
| 6 | 2025-01-30 15:56 | commented | James Derrick ♦952 | Hi, After a check of survey photos and GPX, I think this is an #armchair addition likely from worse imagery. More notes on 123965431 but... https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161943008 Happy Mapping, James | ||
| 7 | 2025-01-31 12:47 | closed | James Derrick ♦952 | Hi, After finding Mapillary imagery confirming a flat crossing (handrail to the N), and updating the area, closing! https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=259034485970364 Happy Mapping, James | ||
| 268321 | 1 | 2014-11-10 00:58 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The cemetery here is from NPE and doesn't match the Bing imagery. Survey needed. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:19 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 13:59 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | this cemetary looks good to me from sat image, anything left to do? | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-30 14:04 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | If it matches the imagery, it should be all good now. | ||
| 193727 | 1 | 2014-07-03 23:50 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Lindrick Road is signed as no exit at the north end, so presumably it's not all an unclassified road. What restriction is there and where, and what traffic (such as foot or bicycle) is actually allowed? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:17 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 10:21 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | I think this has been fixed in the last 10 years. | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-30 12:22 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Actually, it appears to have been fixed and unfixed! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995899530/history was edited by John Stanworth (who's a Sheffield-based mapper who's been exploring local footpaths) split the road and added the correct name, and then https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/di4tu2/history (who doesn't seem local) removed the restriction. I'll set it back to how John Stanworth left it. A separate discussion is whether the southern bit is best residential or service, I guess. | ||
| 199922 | 1 | 2014-07-14 10:44 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I don't think that Lathkill Drive is single track is it? Isn't it at least one in each direction (albeit narrow) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes would suggest lanes=2 ? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:17 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 10:30 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | satalite image seems to show no marked lanes here. | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-30 12:14 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Thanks for checking | ||
| 710879 | 1 | 2016-09-13 12:09 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388938895 clearly isn't conguent with the centre line of the path; needs proper survey. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 10:31 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | I think this has since been fixed? | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 12:13 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Yes - thanks | ||
| 232438 | 1 | 2014-08-29 18:55 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | This footpath needs surveying. It seems very straight, doesn't join and run through buildings on the underlying imagery. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:18 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 11:31 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | I think this has since been fixed | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-30 12:13 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Thanks for looking at these - it looks like Dudley updated it a couple of years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107173714/history still has a fixme on it but now joins and no longer runs through buildings etc. In case you're wondering about this sudden influx of note closures and reopens, last night a user decided to close 85 of (only) my open notes and then delete their account after being asked why https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17175 . I'm guessing it was just a personal attack (perhaps related to my DWG work). | ||
| 6 | 2025-01-30 12:19 | reopened | Mex ♦6,787 | |||
| 7 | 2025-01-30 12:20 | closed | Mex ♦6,787 | I assumed so, did let me find some of your really old notes to clear up though! :) | ||
| 179314 | 1 | 2014-06-04 21:31 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There's a node here marked as both a bus stop AND a telephone. I suspect that the node's actually the imported northbound bus stop node, and should be the other side of the road, and there should be a second node to describe the telephone. Needs a survey. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:16 | closed | OsmZuzy | This was fixed a long time ago. | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:35 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 179600 | 1 | 2014-06-05 15:44 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is this unpaved thing really an unclassified road or just a track? Needs a survey really. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:16 | closed | OsmZuzy | What thing? | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:35 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 184232 | 1 | 2014-06-15 11:11 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Needs more traces E and W of Fackley Way to check Bing NS alignment | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:16 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:35 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 10:07 | closed | Mex ♦6,787 | area is well aligned with cadastral data | ||
| 209482 | 1 | 2014-07-31 12:48 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | This path needs survey - it is not on this alignment | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:17 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 228608 | 1 | 2014-08-24 12:21 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Does the reservoir go further north than currently mapped? OS_OpenData_StreetView thinks so; Bing imagery isn't clear. Need to check from footpath after a rainy bank holiday or in winter. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:17 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 229098 | 1 | 2014-08-24 22:00 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Needs to revisit this - my notes have the track to the west starting to the north of the kissing gate, which does not make sense. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:17 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 231811 | 1 | 2014-08-28 20:22 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The last time I was here, this was definitely a highway=track rather than a bridleway (though it was a designation=public_bridleway). Has it really deteriorated that much? Need to check. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:17 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 236081 | 1 | 2014-09-04 13:43 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There are a bunch of unconnected cycleways around this roundabout. Needs a survey to figure out the best way to connect them. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:18 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 10:25 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | this looks reasonable for whats on the ground based on sat image | ||
| 241008 | 1 | 2014-09-15 11:22 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | How many of the roads in here are private and how many not? "West Way" from the north is clearly marked as private, and so is the track from the southeast. There is allegedly a bus stop on Peach Lane, though, so presumably that's accessible. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:18 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 241372 | 1 | 2014-09-15 19:49 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | As with http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/241365 , this is signed as being part of Stalybridge Country Park. But how do the two join up? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:18 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 241620 | 1 | 2014-09-16 08:11 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There's a duplicate former railway and "path" here. In reality they're the same thing and the "path" is actually a track with a public bridleway running along it. Needs a proper survey to sort out access from here south. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:18 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 243334 | 1 | 2014-09-19 11:45 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Check both of these two shop types | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:18 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 11:34 | closed | Mex ♦6,787 | I think this has already been updated | ||
| 244596 | 1 | 2014-09-21 15:31 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is this still best described as a pub? The main signage on the A52 describes it as a cafe; the website as a hotel, bar, and caravan site. Need to visit to find out whether it's best mapped as one thing (and if so what) or several. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:18 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 247052 | 1 | 2014-09-25 15:44 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | This footpath needs a proper survey. Presumably it joins Bowling Alley Lane, but exactly how (stiles, gates, etc.) needs to be discovered. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:18 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 247056 | 1 | 2014-09-25 15:47 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The footpath that runs south of here needs a proper survey. It seems to get through hedges without using stiles or gates, and runs right through at least one farmhouse. It probably also joins the road here rather than the landuse. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:18 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 247061 | 1 | 2014-09-25 15:53 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I'm guessing that the two bridleways here are actually one and the same, and the actual place where it joins the road is around where this marker is. Needs survey. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:19 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 247059 | 1 | 2014-09-25 15:50 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Need to survey to see exactly how this footpath joins the road here (stiles, gates, etc.) | |
| 2 | 2014-09-25 15:55 | commented | trigpoint ♦6,777 | Will have a look next time I go that way | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:19 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 00:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 247064 | 1 | 2014-09-25 15:56 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | As drawn, this footpath is clearly rubbish. I suspect that from the west it actually joins the stub to the northeast of here, rather than connecting to the wrong side of the bridge. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:19 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 247066 | 1 | 2014-09-25 15:58 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I suspect that this footpath does not run through this farm building here. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:19 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 13:56 | closed | Mex ♦6,787 | no foot path mapped here any more | ||
| 249290 | 1 | 2014-09-29 23:28 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Need to have a look to see how the (mostly artificial?) north-south channel interacts with the natural east-west streams. Does it act as some sort of load balancer, or a feeder for something else? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:19 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 260477 | 1 | 2014-10-24 17:36 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Presumably this footpath joins the main road, but does it go right past the pub or into the car park first? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:19 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 267395 | 1 | 2014-11-07 20:40 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Presumably the footpath from the south here joins the path to the north of it? You can't see from the imagery because of tree cover, but it seems pretty likely. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:19 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 270501 | 1 | 2014-11-14 19:17 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3133738122 needs a tag that would enable people who are looking for services like this to actually find it. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=plumber#values suggests "craft=plumber"; would that make sense? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:19 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-09-13 19:18 | closed | OSM Warrior ♦385 | amended business to plumber | ||
| 277327 | 1 | 2014-11-27 19:39 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There are two "Harmston Heath" localities here. I assume that this is just copy-and-pasting from OS OpenData, and in reality there is either zero or 1 places with that name? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:19 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 271666 | 1 | 2014-11-17 13:15 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24512612#map=19/53.42937/-1.98834&layers=N needs a survey southwest from here to see exactly how it joins. The paths southeast and northwest I've aligned from GPS traces, but way 24512612 doesn't obviously match a ground feature and there are no underlying traces. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:19 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 271670 | 1 | 2014-11-17 13:19 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The "oneway" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39781696 is clearly rubbish as there'd be no way for cars to get out. I suspect that all of this section is probably a private road, but with foot (and possibly horse and cycle access) also designated by being a "Public Footpath" or "Public Bridleway" or similar. Needs a survey to check. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:20 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 14:04 | closed | Mex ♦6,787 | this looks to have since been fixed. | ||
| 283774 | 1 | 2014-12-09 12:15 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is there really a disused rail line north of here (that then forks both east and west). It's possible, but somewhat unlikely - needs a proper survey. | |
| 2 | 2014-12-09 12:15 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | (it's surely not called "LNER" either!) | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:20 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 290049 | 1 | 2014-12-22 19:54 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315530715 might be another house? The imagery appears to be out of date here, so a survey will be needed. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:20 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 14:09 | closed | Mex ♦6,787 | If i'm understanding correctly I think this way has now been deleted. | ||
| 290058 | 1 | 2014-12-22 20:05 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There are some untagged and some duplicate features here (try http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/27.15017/87.24251&layers=ND to see them). What are they and what should they be tagged as? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:20 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 291657 | 1 | 2014-12-26 16:15 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There's some sort of farm shoppy thing in one of these two buildings. What exactly is it and what is it called? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:20 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 291732 | 1 | 2014-12-26 19:47 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Some of the features mapped here (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93905193 ) look like they predate the current business park layout. Also many of the former aeroways appear to be no longer present. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:20 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 14:39 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | updted to be much closer to current sat images | ||
| 64434 | 1 | 2013-10-27 23:04 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The bridleways south of here partially duplicate the existing service road. Are they signed "public bridleway"? If so remove the parts of the new bridleways where they duplicate the service roads and add "designation=public_bridleway" to the appropriate parts of the service roads. | |
| 2 | 2015-01-09 15:39 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Since this note was added someone has removed the duplication but not checked that tagging. That will require a survey. | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:20 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 295431 | 1 | 2015-01-03 07:30 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Here http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316657178 seems to be a duplicate of part of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316528733 , which is surely wrong. Also the "motorroad=yes" tag seems unlikely in Nepal (even if highway=primary is valid in this mountainous region, which seems unlikely). | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:20 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 296559 | 1 | 2015-01-05 12:06 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There are two farms named "Butterley Farm" here (to the southwest and northeast). Both have been tagged based on signage, but need to recheck because of the obvious duplication. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:20 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 297582 | 1 | 2015-01-07 01:20 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | What time does this open? A recent changeset comment says that the cafe at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3230697001 is open every day until 14:00, but when does it open? Does it open 7 days a week? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:20 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 298047 | 1 | 2015-01-07 23:19 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There are some duplicate "localities" here http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2899977546 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2899955722 are both allegedly "Caythorpe Low Fields". To the east are http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2899955724 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2899955725, allegedly "Fulbeck Low Fields". In reality I suspect both of these places (if they exist at all on the modern world) are areas rather than point locations, and the mapper has just copied text from OS_OpenData_StreetView without thinking at all about what it represents. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:21 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 298048 | 1 | 2015-01-07 23:23 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I'm not convinced that the farmland to the west of the ridge such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319041308 is really "meadow". When I was last there it just looked like part of the rest of the local farmland (some arable, some with animals on it). | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:21 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 299164 | 1 | 2015-01-09 20:43 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315901396 really a river? As mapped it seems to flow uphill into the village, around, and then down again, which is surely wrong. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:21 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 299227 | 1 | 2015-01-09 23:42 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Landuse needs surveying properly. My recollection is there there are no meadows around Leadenham - it's just regular agricultural land (mostly arable, some grazing). | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:21 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 301061 | 1 | 2015-01-14 01:24 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The Bing imagery here is currently offset to the south by 5m or so, and unfortunately this does not seem to be have been taken into account by recent "non-surveying" mappers. Things need shuffling north to match reality (the actual amount varies by location). | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:21 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 301069 | 1 | 2015-01-14 02:39 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Check for any signage that might justify the name of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40961536 as current. I suspect there won't be any - if there isn't any evidence for the name it should be removed. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:21 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 8684 | 1 | 2013-06-20 21:46 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is this path really called this? It looks more like a description than a ame. | |
| 2 | 2015-01-15 17:27 | commented | --- | Yes South Coast Cycle Route | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:21 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 301070 | 1 | 2015-01-14 02:48 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The imagery suggests that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316741487 should be abandoned rather than disused - is it possible to check properly from the footpath to the south, or does the relative level of the path and rail line make this impossible? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:21 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 305648 | 1 | 2015-01-22 17:58 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There are duplicate "Potterhanworth Heath" here (with slight spelling differences) - http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2663469087 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2653706497 . I'm guessing in reality there is no such verifiable place, and someone has just copied some text from an OS OpenData_StreetView map. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:21 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 305654 | 1 | 2015-01-22 18:15 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The access rights on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322875404/history need checking. The footpath to the south is a public footpath, as is the one to the north, but this section is allegedly only permissive. My recollection of this area is that the section where this note is is PF, but although the PF is signed north everyone takes the shortcut (actually the signed PF may not be accessible - or I may be thinking of the access at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/53.14654/-0.52668&layers=QN). Anyway - needs a survey. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:22 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 305659 | 1 | 2015-01-22 18:49 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | As drawn, the landuse here is misplaced. The fence to the west of the footpath http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273674141 is the boundary between the farmyard with the buildings in it (to the east) and the farmland (not meadow as I recall) to the west. Needs redrawing properly. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:22 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:29 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 307703 | 1 | 2015-01-27 01:07 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Something odd seems to have happened to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4902282/history - it's been deleted. It overlapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4902133 (which has very odd tags, and probably needs a proper survey to see what it is), but the tags that were on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4902282/history aren't duplicated. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:22 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:28 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 309341 | 1 | 2015-01-30 12:31 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | More duplicate copied-from-OS-StreetView alleged localities here - there are 4 "Coleby Low Fields". I'm guessing that in reality these do not exist. Needs checking to see if any of them actually are verifiable on the ground. If they don't, and only exist for historical reasons in OS maps (which are a pretty unreliably source of locality names), they don't below in OSM. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:22 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:28 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 309343 | 1 | 2015-01-30 12:32 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | More duplicate copied-from-OS-StreetView alleged localities here - there are a couple of "Harmston Low Fields". I'm guessing that in reality these do not exist. Needs checking to see if any of them actually are verifiable on the ground. If they don't, and only exist for historical reasons in OS maps (which are a pretty unreliably source of locality names), they don't below in OSM. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:22 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:28 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 309344 | 1 | 2015-01-30 12:33 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | More duplicate copied-from-OS-StreetView alleged localities here - there are a couple of "Bassingham Fen". I'm guessing that in reality these do not exist as individual locations. Needs checking to see if any of them actually are verifiable on the ground. If they don't, and only exist for historical reasons in OS maps (which are a pretty unreliably source of locality names), they don't below in OSM. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:22 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:28 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 314451 | 1 | 2015-02-10 20:54 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Duplicate "Scopwick Heath" localities seem to have been copied from an old OS map east and west of here. Does either actually still exist? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:22 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:28 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 277305 | 1 | 2014-11-27 18:20 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | What traffic is allowed to go between Colbeck Street and Shaw Street? An armchair mapper joined the roads, but the imagery suggests probably not. However, it's quite likely that foot or cycle traffic can get across - but needs a survey to check. | |
| 2 | 2015-02-09 22:42 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Also, what's the access west (if any) from Colbeck Street to the car park accessible from Cresswell Road? See also discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28352489 . | ||
| 3 | 2015-02-11 04:13 | closed | samely | Hi there, yes there appears to be a wall separating the street and the parking aisle. I've disconnected them and connected by a footway. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. | ||
| 4 | 2015-02-11 04:14 | reopened | samely | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-30 00:22 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-30 00:28 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 7 | 2025-08-08 09:31 | commented | NigT ♦0 | google street view show footpath access | ||
| 311526 | 1 | 2015-02-04 12:09 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2702393086 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2702393087 here have both been added with a name of "Poultry Farm". I suspect that in reality they're not called this, that this is just a description that has been copied from some other map. Needs a proper survey to see if any name is visible on the ground. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:23 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:28 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-09-11 16:33 | closed | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo ♦220 | I think this one's has been resolved now. I'll mark as resolved | ||
| 311770 | 1 | 2015-02-05 00:33 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | My recollection suggests that there is not a separate footpath here; certainly not one from which you can't access the road at all. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:23 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:28 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 313648 | 1 | 2015-02-09 14:02 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The footpath here doesn't match GPS traces, doesn't join at one end and looks a bit angular and unlikely. Needs a proper survey. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:23 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:28 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 314432 | 1 | 2015-02-10 20:23 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Note that the Bing imagery is offset here (look at the traces to south and west for confirmation). The military bunker is in the correct location, the "hole in the field" (and presumably all the other traced-but-not-surveyed landuse locally) is not. Needs remapping with proper attention to imagery offset. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:23 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:27 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 314434 | 1 | 2015-02-10 20:33 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | What actual evidence is there that the two things called "RAF Digby Other Ranks Family Quarters" east and west of here are actually _named_ that (as opposed to it simply being a description of who lives there). If I have a dog kennel in the garden and a dog called "Spot" lives in it it doesn't mean that the kennel is called "Spot". | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:23 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:27 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 314453 | 1 | 2015-02-10 20:59 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The same logic as http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/314434 applies here - does this really have a _name_ of "RAF Digby Officers Family Quarters" or is this just a description of who lives here? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:23 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:27 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 314506 | 1 | 2015-02-10 23:31 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Do the two residential stretches of 2 Tháng 9 north and south of here join the main road? It's not immediately clear from the imagery. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:23 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:27 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 319540 | 1 | 2015-02-19 14:54 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Do either of the two identically named churches here http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3343935379/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3343896520/history#map=17/5.40387/7.01119 actually exist? What about the road http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327580870/history ? The mapper who added those also added a couple of other implausible features (motorways), so it's possible that they may not exist at all. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:23 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:27 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 236760 | 1 | 2014-09-05 23:37 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | If this really is a public_bridleway, it's probably a "bridleway" rather than a "footway". Also, it probably joins the road? | |
| 2 | 2015-03-20 14:05 | commented | SK53 ♦3,851 | Fixed designation, but the section next to the houses is really a track | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:24 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 00:27 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 332528 | 1 | 2015-03-16 18:31 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1706257198 isn't really a "hunting stand" within the normal meaning of the term. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:24 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:27 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 328819 | 1 | 2015-03-10 01:37 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328986181/history perhaps some sort of small building? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:24 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:27 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 328674 | 1 | 2015-03-09 14:19 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330045217 is very unlikely to have its current misspelt name. Is it really a duplicate of the Cedar Tree pub? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:24 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:27 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-11-07 20:50 | closed | Keith Barnett ♦270 | Name is correctly spelled | ||
| 328623 | 1 | 2015-03-09 12:45 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There seems to be a discrepancy between the designation on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111513802/history ("public_footpath") and the changeset comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28254518 ("Public Bridleway")? Needs survey to check. | |
| 2 | 2015-03-09 12:52 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Also see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59836935/history to the south - that was originally added as a highway=track, but was changed to highway=bridleway recently. I suspect that legally a bridleway runs along the track. Needs survey. | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:24 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 00:26 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 324160 | 1 | 2015-02-27 23:21 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327712752#map=16/45.5397/26.6345 here has no tags, but it does match an underlying GPS trace. Needs a survey to find out what it really is (and a bit of tidying where it duplicates a bit of road). | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:24 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:26 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 324159 | 1 | 2015-02-27 23:12 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326788334 really not a oneway? It seems fairly unlikely that it isn't, but the parallel road is. A number of other roads nearby where also changed to "not oneway" at the same time, and a couple of nearby dual-carriageway roads were not added as oneway to start with. All could do with checking. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:24 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:26 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 319393 | 1 | 2015-02-19 11:07 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Somewhere here there's probably a cemetery. Someone had added the name "Cemetry" to http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3353788 (which it clearly isn't) but presumably there's one somewhere; I'm guessing at the village end. See changeset discussion comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27882876 | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:25 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:26 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 372647 | 1 | 2015-05-31 13:17 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is "locality" really the best way to tag http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338935213/history ? Sounds like some sort of landuse might be more appropriate. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:25 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:26 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 372653 | 1 | 2015-05-31 13:41 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | How does the footpath (or is it really a cycleway) join the road here? The suggestion currently is that they can't go into Doncaster but have to turn left towards Morrison's, which seems unlikely. Also, is there access east along the former railway line? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:25 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:26 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-08-31 19:00 | commented | queerthoughts ♦2,701 | I passed on the A6182 today. It looks like there's an underpass, but it's difficult to see. | ||
| 335305 | 1 | 2015-03-21 12:28 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Need more GPS traces here. The northbound path is from a single trace, but doesn't match the imagery - I suspect it actually joins further to the west, where the stop path is. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:25 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:26 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 341201 | 1 | 2015-04-02 13:40 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29255061 suggests that there's some sort of dog training centre here which needs mapping. Also the road probably doesn't double back on itself. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:25 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:26 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 342890 | 1 | 2015-04-05 21:15 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There's some new build housing around here somewhere - is it here or just to the northwest? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-30 00:25 | closed | OsmZuzy | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-30 00:26 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-30 15:04 | closed | Mex ♦6,787 | no new builds on this area on sat image, probably already covered. | ||
| 4601712 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-25 17:11 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | millennium way gp e, rm n, fulford ings n, pf en via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/258472.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-25 23:54 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/258472.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12532927206 | ||
| 4601693 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-25 16:55 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | diamond jubilee via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/258467.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-25 23:50 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6515014843 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/258467.jpg | ||
| 4601688 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-25 16:50 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | cct water fulford 1883 ? via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/258466.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-25 23:47 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/258466.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-25 23:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-25 23:48 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12532893352 | ||
| 4482863 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-10-17 16:52 | opened | yorkmapfox ♦12 | Unable to answer "What kind of parking is this?" – Parking Lot – https://osm.org/way/131958367 via StreetComplete 59.2: Not here any more, this land is being redeveloped | |
| 2 | 2025-01-25 22:51 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Looks like parking has been deleted. | ||
| 4481811 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-10-16 22:07 | opened | yorkmapfox ♦12 | Unable to answer "Is this stop lit?" – Cemetery (Bus Stop) – https://osm.org/node/11833741865 via StreetComplete 59.2: Doesn't appear to be a Southbound bus stop at all | |
| 2 | 2025-01-25 22:48 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11833741865 changed to no pole physically present. It's a CUS stop so you would not expect one. | ||
| 4499663 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-10-29 18:13 | opened | yorkmapfox ♦12 | Unable to answer "What’s the name of this street?" – Residential Road – https://osm.org/way/832151011 via StreetComplete 59.3: Public footpath and bridleway, no name as far as I can tell | |
| 2 | 2025-01-25 22:45 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/832151011 to service, which makes more sense. | ||
| 4525612 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-11-19 13:37 | opened | yorkmapfox ♦12 | Unable to answer "Is this stop lit?" – Anson Drive (Bus Stop) – https://osm.org/node/11824221734 via StreetComplete 59.3: Bus stop not signed on this side, sign opposite doesn't say both sides. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-25 22:40 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161763639 - It's a CUS stop so you would not expect it to be signed; good to have confirmation of that! | ||
| 4512087 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-11-08 17:36 | opened | yorkmapfox ♦12 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Tennis Court – https://osm.org/way/915572588 via StreetComplete 59.3: Land appears to be under redevelopment | |
| 2 | 2025-01-25 22:36 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Now added as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354289187 . | ||
| 4600157 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-24 14:29 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | How do cyclists get from the cycleway to the road here? After an edit by a now-deleted user, there is now a gap at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13512082#map=20/51.3941543/0.5625678 . | |
| 2 | 2025-02-13 11:46 | closed | rskedgell ♦2,400 | There's a lowered kerb - see https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=51.39422%7E0.562352&lvl=19.9&mo=om.1&pi=-16.1&style=x&dir=68.3 Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162251302 | ||
| 89798 | 1 | 2013-12-23 00:50 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Presumably the bridleway here runs along the service road and then exits at north and south? | |
| 2 | 2014-01-16 14:30 | commented | --- | Aerial view suggests that (a) the bridleway has been diverted about 100m to the east because there is a sandpit beside Whitsundales Farm and (b) it terminates at the first loop in the access road. Needs to be resurveyed! | ||
| 3 | 2024-01-16 14:31 | commented | NeisBot ♦21,982 | Thank you for your note. It appears to be quite old, dating back more than 10 years. To ensure the map is up-to-date, I kindly ask for your input. If there are still relevant details or updates regarding this note? Thank you! #OldNote | ||
| 4 | 2024-01-17 10:54 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Hello Mr Bot, Perhaps you could convey to your human that there is pretty obviously still a problem here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363617345 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117693904 overlap each other.. Likely some part of the service road is PRoW and some part isn't. Comparing with the local authority PRoW overlay https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#16/52.0500/-0.6600/H/P also shows that their view of the bridleway geometry is slightly different to OSM's, so maybe a survey would be needed to resolve that. Best Regards, Andy #BadBot #DontWasteHumansTime | ||
| 5 | 2024-01-17 11:02 | commented | NeisBot ♦21,982 | Hello, thank you very much for the feedback. Your analysis with the existing OSM data is very accurate. Could you fix it based on the aerial image as well? Surely, the aerial image is not also 10 years old, like this note. Best regards. | ||
| 6 | 2024-01-17 11:21 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Hello Mr Bot, Yes, you could resolve the overlap, but which part of "... also shows that their view of the bridleway geometry is slightly different to OSM's, so maybe a survey would be needed to resolve that" do I need to further explain? Best Regards, Andy | ||
| 7 | 2024-01-17 11:33 | commented | NeisBot ♦21,982 | Hello, thank you for the response. We don't need any further explanations here because the On-The-Ground rule is crucial in this case. Will this note remain open for the next ten years? The bridleway has also not been corrected in the edits of the mentioned way (versions) above ... However, #HappyMapping | ||
| 8 | 2025-01-20 14:05 | commented | pitscheplatsch ♦7,253 | After one year ... | ||
| 9 | 2025-01-20 14:10 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | and? | ||
| 4538918 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-30 15:32 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There's a suggestion that the Rose and Crown is open again in the local press. Needs checking. | |
| 2 | 2024-12-01 17:42 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | It is shut | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-01 23:36 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2024-12-01 23:37 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Bah - wrong note! It's the Wellington that is definitely shut. | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 19:13 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 19:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 7 | 2025-01-19 15:25 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | It's now open again. | ||
| 431599 | 1 | 2015-09-08 22:11 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Needs a survey here to see exactly where these footpaths go (e.g. which side of the building to the north). | |
| 2 | 2025-01-15 15:05 | closed | fredgolightly ♦41 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-18 11:15 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-18 11:15 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The footpath still seems to go through the garage at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.594376/-1.013227 ? | ||
| 5 | 2025-02-06 16:23 | closed | fredgolightly ♦41 | Walked + gps tracked, updated. | ||
| 4582811 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-09 14:46 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | ecp n via StreetComplete 60.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/256804.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-12 20:35 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/256804.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12496741581 | ||
| 4575951 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-04 16:23 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | boundary stone -inscription illegible in the dark via StreetComplete 60.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/256298.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-12 20:31 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12496795551 | ||
| 4574517 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-03 15:48 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | Coneysthorpe 1.75 e, hovingham 2.5 w, fryton moor 0.75 n, prow, dest, pb, via StreetComplete 60.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/256170.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-12 20:28 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/256170.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12496756035 | ||
| 4574499 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-03 15:34 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | PBguidepost via StreetComplete 60.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/256169.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-01-12 20:23 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/256169.jpg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12496756156 | ||
| 4239743 | 1 | 2024-05-10 18:07 | opened | itspaulkelly ♦20 | Unable to answer "Do these steps have a handrail?" – Steps – https://osm.org/way/348438959 via StreetComplete 57.3: No longer steps here | |
| 2 | 2025-01-09 23:05 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I've removed the steps from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/348438959 | ||
| 4322363 | 1 | 2024-07-06 19:23 | opened | eteb3 ♦1,009 | Moving anti-terrorsim bollards here. Moved from cross-roads? | |
| 2 | 2024-11-11 22:19 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Actually there are two sets of bollards now - the "old fashioned" ones, and then later on the "expensive electronic" ones. Not sure how close to the Assembly Rooms entrance they are though. | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-03 23:24 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Added as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12472655062 | ||
| 577331 | 1 | 2016-05-29 20:53 | opened | --- | path to Marshes and weird farm buildings needs to be added | |
| 2 | 2016-06-27 12:46 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Also, currently the path with the level crossing on it joins two streams, which seems very unlikely. | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 23:48 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦26 | I added the paths. | ||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 20:06 | reopened | Awoobis ♦433 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 20:07 | commented | Awoobis ♦433 | Troll account above, looks the same, is banned. | ||
| 6 | 2025-01-02 21:34 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | @Awoobis yes, but the initial reason for the note has been resolved in the last 8 years I think - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76864328/history has been added, and no longer crosses any streams. | ||
| 3044979 | 1 | 2022-02-10 05:27 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Gold club will need re-survey now that residential development has gone in across some fairways | |
| 2 | 2022-02-10 10:27 | commented | TheSwavu ♦6,470 | I can't believe how long this redevelopment is taking. At least 4 years and they are still not finished. | ||
| 3 | 2023-04-17 02:27 | commented | TheSwavu ♦6,470 | 2024-04 construction still ongoing. | ||
| 4 | 2023-04-17 02:27 | commented | TheSwavu ♦6,470 | Should have been 2023-04 | ||
| 5 | 2023-06-07 09:27 | commented | TheSwavu ♦6,470 | Updated what is visible on Maxar. | ||
| 6 | 2024-09-29 04:50 | commented | GeeMaps! ♦2,740 | Miracle of miracles - a lot of it now appears done, so after a couple of hours work, it's almost finished!!! Now appears to have too many holes though? | ||
| 7 | 2024-12-24 17:50 | closed | DavidFactChex | |||
| 8 | 2024-12-24 19:08 | reopened | TheSwavu ♦6,470 | |||
| 9 | 2025-01-02 02:39 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 10 | 2025-01-02 02:51 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 3475948 | 1 | 2022-12-13 06:22 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Please update school details & layout when known | |
| 2 | 2023-05-29 10:27 | commented | TheSwavu ♦6,470 | Checked. Not on imagery yet. | ||
| 3 | 2024-06-10 23:46 | commented | Tech Dec ♦381 | I added preliminary features in changeset 146387475 and 132702488. Still waiting for new imagery to ensure it's all there and aligned properly. | ||
| 4 | 2024-12-24 17:49 | closed | DavidFactChex | |||
| 5 | 2024-12-24 19:08 | reopened | TheSwavu ♦6,470 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-02 02:39 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 7 | 2025-01-02 02:51 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 3514285 | 1 | 2023-01-12 06:49 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Please confirm Lynwood Court is actually in this location | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:29 | closed | RoadGum ♦98 | |||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:03 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:38 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:50 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4067040 | 1 | 2024-01-14 05:58 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is this named Market Street / Place? | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:42 | closed | DavidFactChex | |||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:38 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:50 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 6 | 2025-04-13 04:46 | closed | bentrails ♦44 | Market Street | ||
| 3586347 | 1 | 2023-03-06 02:52 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Please confirm name of this street? Currently mapped as Ι. Ζαχαρία / I. Zacharia, but complaint received that it should possibly be Αγ. Σπυριδωνος / Ag. Spyridonas? | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:41 | closed | DavidFactChex | |||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:03 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:38 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:50 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4067041 | 1 | 2024-01-14 05:58 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is this only a walkway, or does it also have vehicle access? | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:42 | closed | DavidFactChex | |||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:38 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:50 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 6 | 2025-04-13 04:42 | closed | bentrails ♦44 | Vehicle Access with Motorcycle Parking | ||
| 4099121 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:14 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Staat dit strandwachtgebouw er eigenlijk wel? Als er geen gebouw is, moet lifeguard=yes gewoon worden toegevoegd aan het strand. Bedankt! Is this lifeguard building actually here? If there's no building, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-02-06 09:22 | commented | eggie ♦4,388 | Momenteel staat er geen gebouw. Zal wel weer opgebouwd worden komend seizoen. lifeguard staat op toegevoegd. https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=06-02-2023&loc=52.08790%2C4.244987%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-11-28&acqid=20231128_112125_SVNEO-01&sensor=SuperView-NEO | ||
| 3 | 2024-03-06 17:16 | commented | os-emmer ♦523 | I just removed emergency_service=lifeguard from this object as it was a duplicate of emergency=lifeguard. Is there a tagging scheme for buildings that get removed during winter and rebuild in summer? | ||
| 4 | 2024-03-06 17:33 | commented | eggie ♦4,388 | seasonal=yes is the only tag I know. Perhaps a question at the forum? | ||
| 5 | 2024-03-06 17:54 | commented | os-emmer ♦523 | Thanks for that idea. I searched the forum for "sesonal buildings and found this German thread: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/temporare-gebaude-jedes-jahr-wieder-an-ungefahr-gleichem-ort/94389 I did not read every post but there seems to be no consens for or agains using something like seasonal=yes or building:seasonal=*. | ||
| 6 | 2024-03-06 18:15 | commented | eggie ♦4,388 | 👍 | ||
| 7 | 2024-12-24 17:49 | closed | DavidFactChex | This was duplicated by such notes as note 4099142. Closing now. | ||
| 8 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 9 | 2025-01-02 02:38 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 10 | 2025-01-02 02:50 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 11 | 2025-06-01 12:41 | commented | MJvW ♦6 | It is a seasonal building that has been placed here again. | ||
| 12 | 2025-06-01 15:34 | closed | os-emmer ♦523 | I just marked the object as seasonal: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167055999 | ||
| 4099122 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:16 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:42 | closed | DavidFactChex | |||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:38 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:50 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 6 | 2025-03-15 17:35 | closed | Person0104 | |||
| 7 | 2025-03-15 23:26 | reopened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Please actually answer the question asked, don't just close the Note | ||
| 4099124 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:18 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:43 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099123 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:38 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:50 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099125 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:19 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:43 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099124 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:38 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:50 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099126 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:19 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:43 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099125 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:38 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:50 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099127 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:20 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:43 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099125 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:38 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:50 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099128 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:21 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:44 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099126 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:37 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:50 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099129 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:21 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:44 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099127 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:37 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:50 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099130 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:22 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:44 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099129 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:37 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:50 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099131 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:22 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:45 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099128 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:37 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:49 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099132 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:23 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:45 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099130 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:37 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:49 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099133 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:23 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:45 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099131 or 4099132 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:37 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:49 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099134 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:24 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:46 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099133 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:37 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:49 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099135 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:24 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:46 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099134 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:37 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:49 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099136 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:25 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:47 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099135 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:37 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:49 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099137 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:25 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:47 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099136 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:37 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:49 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099139 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:27 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Are these two lifeguard tags duplicates? | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:47 | closed | DavidFactChex | No, but your notes are. | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:37 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:49 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099140 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:27 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:48 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099138 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:37 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:49 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099141 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:27 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:48 | closed | DavidFactChex | duplicate of 4099140 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:37 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:49 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099123 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:17 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:42 | closed | DavidFactChex | Duplicate of 4099122 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:36 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4099142 | 1 | 2024-02-04 02:28 | opened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | Is there an actual lifeguard building here? If not, lifeguard=yes should just be added to the beach. Thanks! | |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 17:48 | closed | DavidFactChex | duplicate of 4099141 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-02 02:35 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-02 02:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4327521 | 1 | 2024-07-10 12:08 | opened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | Im länderübergreifenden NSG ist sommers ausschliesslich der ausgewiesene Wanderweg zur Aussichtsplattform freigegeben; alle anderen Wege sind tabu. Im Winterhalbjahr darf das NSG auf den ausgewiesenen Wegen betreten werden. Kann sich jemand mit Ortskenntis darum kümmern, das geeignet abzubilden? | In the cross-country nature reserve, the designated hiking trail to the viewing platform is open during the summer months only; all other paths are off-limits. During the winter half-year, the reserve can be accessed on the designated paths. Can someone with local knowledge take care of appropriately illustrating this? |
| 2 | 2024-12-31 18:03 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | يرجى عدم إعادة تنشيط الملاحظات غير المرغوب فيها! هذا سلوك غير مفيد للغاية وغير مفيد. | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-31 19:45 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 4 | 2024-12-31 22:52 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | مرة أخرى، يرجى التوقف عن إعادة فتح هذه الملاحظات. | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 06:02 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 08:19 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 7 | 2025-01-01 08:36 | reopened | Đuro Jiří ♦20,727 | |||
| 8 | 2025-01-01 19:02 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 9 | 2025-01-01 19:41 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 10 | 2025-01-02 02:35 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 11 | 2025-01-02 02:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4327522 | 1 | 2024-07-10 12:10 | opened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | An dieser Stelle des Ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/798988772 herrscht angeblich tödliche Absturzgefahr, s. u.a. https://www.ak-kurier.de/akkurier/www/artikel/69690-rettungsaktion-fuer-22-jaehrigen-im-naturschutzgebiet-silbersee https://www.wp.de/staedte/siegerland/article232739081/neunkirchen-geroell-stuerzt-in-silbersee-badende-verletzt.html https://www.siegener-zeitung.de/lokales/siegerland/neunkirchen/naturschutzgebiet-mahlscheid-birgt-hohes-konfliktpotential-im-sommer-ist-der-kessel-tabu-LW5OOAFTXCK44RKOMBTK45S5FT.html | At this location on the path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/798988772, there is supposedly a deadly drop hazard, according to https://www.ak-kurier.de/akkurier/www/article/69690-rettungsaktion-fuer-22-jaehrigen-im-naturschutzgebiet-silbersee and https://www.wp.de/staedte/siegerland/article232739081/neunkirchen-geroell-stuerzt-in-silbersee-badende-verletzt.html. |
| 2 | 2024-12-31 18:03 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | يرجى عدم إعادة تنشيط الملاحظات غير المرغوب فيها! هذا سلوك غير مفيد للغاية وغير مفيد. | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-31 19:45 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 4 | 2024-12-31 22:51 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | مرة أخرى، يرجى التوقف عن إعادة فتح هذه الملاحظات. | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 06:02 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 08:19 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 7 | 2025-01-01 08:36 | reopened | Đuro Jiří ♦20,727 | |||
| 8 | 2025-01-01 19:02 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 9 | 2025-01-01 19:41 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 10 | 2025-01-02 02:35 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 11 | 2025-01-02 02:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4327520 | 1 | 2024-07-10 12:06 | opened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | Lt. Zuschrift der Waldgenossenschaft Struthütten an DWG (Ticket#2024052910000294) handelt es sich bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/798989148 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/798989149 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809249309 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809651969 und einigen kleinen Verbindungsstücken um "zahlreiche illegale Trails" im Naturschutzgebiet. Kann das jemand überprüfen und ggf. korrigieren? | Sure, here's the English translation of the text you provided: "Lt. Zuschrift der Waldgenossenschaft Struthütten an DWG (Ticket#2024052910000294) it concerns illegal trails in the nature reserve. Can someone check and correct this, please?" |
| 2 | 2024-12-31 18:03 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | يرجى عدم إعادة تنشيط الملاحظات غير المرغوب فيها! هذا سلوك غير مفيد للغاية وغير مفيد. | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-31 19:45 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 4 | 2024-12-31 22:51 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | مرة أخرى، يرجى التوقف عن إعادة فتح هذه الملاحظات. | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 06:02 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 08:19 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 7 | 2025-01-01 08:35 | reopened | Đuro Jiří ♦20,727 | |||
| 8 | 2025-01-01 19:02 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 9 | 2025-01-01 19:41 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 10 | 2025-01-02 02:35 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 11 | 2025-01-02 02:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 2699477 | 1 | 2021-06-04 22:51 | opened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | (This note has been re-created from old note #2668927) -------------------------- hackthemap on 2021-05-14 17:47:02 UTC: Riedergraben (a small stream) is probably somewhere here. Is that correct? Can someone provide photos / and or a trail where it is? Or at least confirmation? It is already mapped further north and in the south probably beginning at Street Am Riederbruch (currently not named Riedergraben). -------------------------- (comment removed) | |
| 2 | 2024-03-08 16:36 | commented | ironspock ♦3,963 | Riedergraben ist ab Knoten (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8425565058#map=19/50.13142/8.72292&layers=N) unterirdisch. Ich habe ein fixme eingetragen, da der weitere Verlauf wahrscheinlich unterirdisch Richtung "Am Erlenbruch" | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-31 18:03 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | يرجى عدم إعادة تنشيط الملاحظات غير المرغوب فيها! هذا سلوك غير مفيد للغاية وغير مفيد. | ||
| 4 | 2024-12-31 19:45 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 5 | 2024-12-31 22:52 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | مرة أخرى، يرجى التوقف عن إعادة فتح هذه الملاحظات. | ||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 06:04 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 7 | 2025-01-01 08:19 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 8 | 2025-01-01 08:35 | reopened | Đuro Jiří ♦20,727 | |||
| 9 | 2025-01-01 19:02 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 10 | 2025-01-01 19:40 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 11 | 2025-01-02 02:35 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 12 | 2025-01-02 02:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 1457954 | 1 | 2018-07-17 22:52 | opened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | (This note was originally created on 2016-03-21 17:23:09 UTC by as #531143) -------------- Weg gehört zum Golfplatz, Durchfahrt verboten. | |
| 2 | 2024-12-31 22:59 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | إغلاق ملاحظة من متنمر إلكتروني معروف | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 06:05 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-01 08:19 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 08:32 | reopened | Đuro Jiří ♦20,727 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 18:59 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 7 | 2025-01-01 19:40 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 8 | 2025-01-02 02:35 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 9 | 2025-01-02 02:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 10 | 2025-04-28 11:48 | commented | mardiz ♦4,025 | Kfz auf permit gesetzt | ||
| 11 | 2025-08-15 20:23 | commented | scheme ♦20 | Ich bin zwischen der Unterfuehrung im Nordosten (Kurve Golfstrasse) bis zum Feldweg an der B 294 an keinem Verbotsschild vorbei gekommen. Eigentlich darf hier durch wer will. Fuer KfZ duerfte es aber stellenweise ein bisschen schwierig werden. | ||
| 12 | 2025-08-18 06:30 | commented | limes11 ♦8,460 | Was ist denn der Sinn und Zweck dieses Wegs ? hw=track auf einem Golfplatz ? 'permit' wird kaum stimmen, entweder der ist für alle frei oder nur für eine sehr kleiner Nutzergruppe (i.e. private) | ||
| 13 | 2025-08-18 10:44 | commented | mardiz ♦4,025 | Ist möglicherweise ein Serviceweg für den Golfplatz, bei dem die Nutzung durch andere geduldet wird. Es sollte vor Ort geklärt werden. | ||
| 14 | 2025-08-18 20:58 | commented | scheme ♦20 | So in etwa scheint es zu sein. Ich vermute, dass Golfplatz und die Wege hier historisch gemeinsam gewachsen sind. Der Weg nördlich der Bahnlinie ist durch dichten Bewuchs (der auch die Bahn vor Golfbällen schützt) vom Golfplatz getrennt. Der Weg selbst ist eher zu schmal für Autos, allerdings stehen wie gesagt nirgends Schilder. Im Bereich der Unterführung im Südwesten teilt man ihn sich aber definitiv mit Golfern, die die Löcher südöstlich erreichen wollen. (Am Weg ist der nächste Abschlag ausgeschildert.) Südwestlich der Unterführung ist der Weg an den öffentlichen Feldweg angeschlossen und hat dort auch den Charakter eines selten befahrenen Feldwegs. Direkt nordöstlich der Markierung, von der Einmündung aus, verläuft ein Weg quer über den Platz. Er liegt ein wenig höher als das Gras – kann aber von dort aus leicht betreten werden und andersherum – und ist von Büschen gesäumt. Im Nordwesten ist er an das öffentliche Wegenetz angeschlossen (Herrenweg). An beiden Enden dieses Wegs verhindern Poller, dass Autofahrende ihn als Abkürzung nutzen; ansonsten gibt es keine Barrieren. Auch Verbotsschilder wären mir nirgends aufgefallen. Im Gegenteil: An der Brücke im Herrenweg scheint ein Wanderwegweiser über den Golfplatz zu weisen. | ||
| 4327510 | 1 | 2024-07-10 11:58 | opened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | Lt. Zuschrift der Waldgenossenschaft Struthütten an DWG (Ticket#2024052910000294) existiert der Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373718123 nicht. Im NRW-Liegenschaftskataster scheint hier aber etwas sichtbar zu sein. Wäre super, wenn das jemand vor Ort überprüfen könnte. | There is no English translation available for the provided text as it appears to be written in German. Can I assist you with something else? |
| 2 | 2024-07-10 14:29 | commented | woodpeck ♦3,380 | Ich habe bei der Waldgenossenschaft konkret hierzu nachgefragt und die Antwort erhalten: "Dieser Weg wurde nicht mehr benutzt, wuchs immer mehr zu, wurde dann eingezogen und aus den Karten entfernt und ist mittlerweile zugewachsen bzw. bepflanzt." | ||
| 3 | 2024-08-28 07:07 | commented | Hmmbeere ♦8 | Der Weg war begehbar, aber ich war mir nicht ganz sicher, ob legal, da es betreten verboten Schilder gibt, bei denen nicht eindeutig ist, ob sie sich auf den Weg oder auf die andere Seite des Zauns beziehen. Eine Mr. Pfade Tour geht hier lang. | ||
| 4 | 2024-08-28 07:12 | commented | Hmmbeere ♦8 | Sorry, die Schilder waren glaube ich eher im südlichen Teil des Sees, aber der Track führte auch über diesen Pfad, der aber ziemlich zugewuchert war, von daher war ich mir auch nicht sicher, ob es wirklich legale Wege im NSG waren. | ||
| 5 | 2024-12-24 17:54 | closed | DavidFactChex | |||
| 6 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 7 | 2024-12-31 18:03 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | يرجى عدم إعادة تنشيط الملاحظات غير المرغوب فيها! هذا سلوك غير مفيد للغاية وغير مفيد. | ||
| 8 | 2024-12-31 19:43 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 9 | 2024-12-31 19:48 | commented | qugeb ♦4,239 | Sei doch so nett uns schreibe mit uns entweder auf Englisch oder Deutsch (Landessprache des Hinweises). | ||
| 10 | 2024-12-31 22:55 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | |||
| 11 | 2025-01-01 06:02 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 12 | 2025-01-01 08:18 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 13 | 2025-01-01 08:36 | reopened | Đuro Jiří ♦20,727 | |||
| 14 | 2025-01-01 19:02 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 15 | 2025-01-01 19:41 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 16 | 2025-01-02 02:34 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 17 | 2025-01-02 02:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4280701 | 1 | 2024-06-06 08:10 | opened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | Kann es sein, dass hier ein Wohnmobilverleih ist? Ist der Parkplatz tatsächlich access=customers, oder handelt es sich möglicherweise gar nicht mehr um einen Parkplatz? | Could it be that there's a motorhome rental service here? Is the parking lot actually for customers, or might it not be a parking lot anymore? |
| 2 | 2024-11-02 12:50 | commented | W59 ♦4 | Ja, Wohnmobilverleih "active camping" Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/249384.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-24 17:55 | closed | DavidFactChex | |||
| 4 | 2024-12-28 23:04 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 5 | 2024-12-31 18:02 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | يرجى عدم إعادة تنشيط الملاحظات غير المرغوب فيها! هذا سلوك غير مفيد للغاية وغير مفيد. | ||
| 6 | 2024-12-31 19:45 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 7 | 2024-12-31 22:52 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | مرة أخرى، يرجى التوقف عن إعادة فتح هذه الملاحظات. | ||
| 8 | 2024-12-31 23:17 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 9 | 2024-12-31 23:21 | commented | qugeb ♦4,239 | مرة أخرى: يرجى التوقف عن إغلاق هذه الملاحظات مرة أخرى إذا لم تكتمل | ||
| 10 | 2024-12-31 23:35 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | مرة أخرى: تباً لك | ||
| 11 | 2024-12-31 23:49 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 12 | 2025-01-01 00:28 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | |||
| 13 | 2025-01-01 01:40 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 14 | 2025-01-01 01:55 | closed | Osmsplonkt | This argument has gone on ling enough. Please stop. | ||
| 15 | 2025-01-01 05:35 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 16 | 2025-01-01 08:16 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 17 | 2025-01-01 08:21 | reopened | Đuro Jiří ♦20,727 | |||
| 18 | 2025-01-01 18:58 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 19 | 2025-01-01 19:42 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 20 | 2025-01-02 02:34 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 21 | 2025-01-02 02:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4325761 | 1 | 2024-07-09 08:58 | opened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | Zum Way 196750060 schreibt der Waldbesitzer an die DWG (Ticket#2024070210000241), es sei "ein alter Schleppweg, der mittlerweile zugewachsen ist ... Bei dem Wald handelt es sich um eine Forstdickung und es ist eine Wildruhezone dort angebracht. Hier ist das Betreten verboten." Der Waldbesitzer wünscht eine Löschung des Wegs, aber mir scheint er dafür noch zu deutlich auf dem Luftbild erkenntbar. Könnte sich das jemand vor Ort ansehen und evtl. zugewachsene Stücke entfernen und/oder angemessene Betretungsverbote erfassen, die vor Ort erkennbar sind? | The forest owner writes to the DWG (Ticket#2024070210000241) that it is an old logging road that has become overgrown... It is a forest thickening and it is appropriate to have a wildlife sanctuary there. The path is forbidden, but it still seems too visible on the aerial image. Could someone check on site and remove any overgrown parts and/or appropriate walking restrictions that are visibly marked? |
| 2 | 2024-12-31 18:03 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | يرجى عدم إعادة تنشيط الملاحظات غير المرغوب فيها! هذا سلوك غير مفيد للغاية وغير مفيد. | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-31 19:45 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 4 | 2024-12-31 22:51 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | مرة أخرى، يرجى التوقف عن إعادة فتح هذه الملاحظات. | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 06:04 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 08:20 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 7 | 2025-01-01 08:30 | reopened | Đuro Jiří ♦20,727 | |||
| 8 | 2025-01-01 18:58 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 9 | 2025-01-01 19:42 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 10 | 2025-01-02 02:34 | closed | deleted user123 ♦36 | |||
| 11 | 2025-01-02 02:48 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 12 | 2025-02-24 13:19 | commented | chris66 ♦16,492 | Der Weg ist deutlich auf Luftbildern zu sehen und sogar in ALKIS verzeichnet, er sollte auf keinen Fall gelöscht werden. Falls er entsprechend beschildert ist darf er natürlich gerne auf access privat oder so gesetzt werden. | ||
| 13 | 2025-10-13 19:55 | closed | silly_goose ♦139 | Weg auf access=no gesetzt, damit sollte glaub ich jedes Routing unterbunden werden können; eine Löschung erachte ich aber auch nicht als sinnvoll, gerade weil der Weg noch deutlich sichtbar ist; sollten sich Leute da trotzdem irgendwie hinverirren, wäre es für den Notfall zumindest gut, wenn die sich dann mit der Karte an dem bekannten Weg orientieren können | ||
| 3155389 | 1 | 2022-04-28 07:18 | opened | Matyjace | Forwarding anonymous report from #Mapy.cz user, please verify: "there is a store" | |
| 2 | 2023-01-03 16:48 | closed | JanuXXL | |||
| 3 | 2023-01-07 22:29 | reopened | Fizzie-DWG ♦6,157 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-01 08:22 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | تم التحقق من الاسم قبل عامين. إغلاق هذه الملاحظة | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 08:28 | reopened | Đuro Jiří ♦20,727 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 10:05 | closed | Ta uwaga jest zbędna | Podobnych uwag można tworzyć tysiące. Zero konkretów. Zamykam. | ||
| 7 | 2025-01-01 19:43 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 8 | 2025-01-01 19:43 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 9 | 2025-01-01 19:46 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 10 | 2025-05-27 07:13 | closed | Ryzy85 ♦172 | Store official address is 36A but it looks like it i placed in building 37 It is not so important in my opinion I think it is to close | ||
| 1971594 | 1 | 2019-10-23 13:36 | opened | --- | onosm.org submitted note from a business: name: Панамера phone: website: twitter: undefined hours: category: ,Cafes address: Varna, Bulgaria | |
| 2 | 2019-10-23 13:37 | hidden | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 3 | 2019-10-23 13:42 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2024-12-31 23:26 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | إغلاق العديد من الملاحظات القديمة وغير المرغوب فيها والمكررة التي أعيد فتحها من قبل ثور إلكتروني دون سبب. هذه إحدى هذه الملاحظات | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 09:18 | reopened | Dimitar155 ♦3,407 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 19:06 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | أضفت العمل اللعين: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160881673 | ||
| 7 | 2025-01-01 19:41 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 8 | 2025-01-01 19:42 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The changeset linked to above will need checking - the person who created it is just a spammer. | ||
| 9 | 2025-01-01 19:50 | closed | Dimitar155 ♦3,407 | I've tagged the added node accordingly, thank you for the heads up. It will be checked whenever SC/ED user surveys the area. | ||
| 1392617 | 1 | 2018-05-13 11:31 | opened | --- | Dieser Weg existiert nicht! | |
| 2 | 2018-05-13 11:32 | hidden | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 3 | 2018-05-13 13:30 | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,380 | |||
| 4 | 2024-12-31 23:01 | closed | رينشهر ♦390 | إغلاق الملاحظات القديمة أو المكررة أو غير المرغوب فيها | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 06:05 | reopened | qugeb ♦4,239 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 08:20 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | كوجيب، توقف عن إعادة فتح الملاحظات التي لا معنى لها!!! هذا هو حسابي الثالث حيث تم حظر الحسابين الأولين بشكل خاطئ. | ||
| 7 | 2025-01-01 08:32 | reopened | Đuro Jiří ♦20,727 | |||
| 8 | 2025-01-01 19:01 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 9 | 2025-01-01 19:40 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4569543 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-30 16:24 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Press reports suggest that The Roebuck is currently closed. Needs a more recent survey; Sam Smiths pubs come and go. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:11 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:35 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 241365 | 1 | 2014-09-15 19:26 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | This is signed on the road as being Stalybridge Country Park, as is the bit around the corner to the southeast. Need to find out the north and east edges before trying to map, though. | |
| 2 | 2014-09-15 19:49 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/241372 . | ||
| 3 | 2024-11-28 15:19 | commented | tomhukins ♦276 | Since you left this note, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516706258 has been added to the map linking to https://www.tameside.gov.uk/Countryside/Stalybridge-Country-Park which suggests the country park comprises two separate areas, of with the southernmost now exists as way 516706258 and the northernmost is unmapped near your other note. | ||
| 4 | 2025-01-01 19:13 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 19:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 19:35 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4545335 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-06 16:37 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The Roebuck has actually been shut for some time, but there is a rumour (in the Pint Pot) that it was supposed to be reopening on Thursday, didn't, but is supposed to reopen early Dec 2024. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:13 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4547451 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-08 21:11 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Local press reports suggest that the Museum Street Tavern https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307840252 is reopening Tuesday 10th Dec (soft launch followed by "grand opening" at the weekend). Allegedly to be wet led with food, by same people behind the Gillygate and he Saddle. Needs survey to see what happens and when. | |
| 2 | 2024-12-11 12:54 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Front door still closed | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-14 18:24 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Now open | ||
| 4 | 2025-01-01 19:13 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 19:34 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 19:34 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 887335 | 1 | 2017-02-09 22:35 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | The route of the Robin Hood Way through Wollaton Park doesn't look very plausible. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1652131#map=16/52.9470/-1.2095 to see the problem. | |
| 2 | 2024-09-15 20:55 | commented | Nathaniel Taulbut ♦69 | this relation still looks messed up | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:14 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-01 19:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 614749 | 1 | 2016-07-03 16:40 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There's a barrier with a strange tag value at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/459159418 . What actually is it? | |
| 2 | 2024-05-22 13:19 | commented | Mex ♦6,787 | still here 8 years later | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:14 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-01 19:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 529767 | 1 | 2016-03-19 00:09 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | According to http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=2714630753 , Feltham has had 5 different "place" values over the years. It's recently been changed to suburb again which it hasn't been for a couple of years - is that OK? | |
| 2 | 2019-03-11 12:43 | closed | Mapper50 | |||
| 3 | 2019-03-11 13:52 | reopened | Mapper50 | |||
| 4 | 2024-04-08 17:28 | commented | james43543 | Mega Transfers is renowned as the best Chauffeur Service in London Heathrow, dedicated to offering effortless and tranquil travel solutions for both groups and individuals. As a licensed entity acclaimed for top-notch service, we have become the epitome of excellence in the chauffeur industry, particularly for those traveling to and from Heathrow Airport. With over fifteen years of expertise, our commitment to superior quality has positioned us as the benchmark for others in the field, always placing the comfort and satisfaction of our passengers at the forefront of our mission. Contact us at Mega Transfers Limited 1st Floor, 29 Minerva Road, London, England, NW10 6HJ, United Kingdom https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fg%2F1pxq78y9_ #chauffeur service #Best Chauffeur Service Heathrow To London #NW10 6HJ #mega transfers limited. Let's know more information: https://www.megatransfers.com/best-chauffeur-service-in-london/ | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 19:14 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-01 19:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 7 | 2025-10-07 19:38 | closed | Wey2go ♦46 | evidently; it's been 2.5 years; it's hardly a main London district nor a town nor village. | ||
| 81652 | 1 | 2013-12-02 00:03 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | When I drove past here a couple of weeks ago, the road layout bore no relation to what is in OSM. There was one road from the south that turned west, and one joining from the north. There were not three parallel north-south roads (though individual lanes were marked at the junction, and could be mapped as lanes). | |
| 2 | 2013-12-24 16:44 | commented | --- | Indeed the individual lanes are mapped here, although I have not yet put the turn restrictions in. Although it does look a little messy to look at at the moment at some point, I assume (and hope), there will be rendering for secondary road areas, as there is at the moment for residential, unclassified and service roads. As soon as this happens I'll start updating the roads in the area. | ||
| 3 | 2020-04-11 16:29 | commented | ◪ Jarv ♦373 | Came through here earlier today, Just a typical two lane single carriageway with a turning lane in the centre. None of the traffic islands really warrant being mapped as dual carriageway, except the one on Silver Street as it has a war memorial on it. Making all appropriate changes now. There are also some benches opposite the junction, but do not exact location of them so will omit them | ||
| 4 | 2025-01-01 19:15 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 19:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 60318 | 1 | 2013-10-20 19:11 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Bridleway needs a bit more of a survey. It presumably joins the roads at east and west, and runs through the gate. How much of it is actually a track? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:15 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 64439 | 1 | 2013-10-27 23:17 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Does this bridleway run on this alignment or along the farm track (and is the alignment of that shown on Bing correct)? More GPS traces needed. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:16 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:33 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 74479 | 1 | 2013-11-15 22:35 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There are two buildings here on almost exactly the same footprint. Presumably one of them is more correct than the other? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:16 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 74480 | 1 | 2013-11-15 22:38 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There are a couple of other examples of overlapping buildings here. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:16 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 83262 | 1 | 2013-12-05 21:42 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Are there bus stop poles physically present here? The Naptan data didn't think so (they were set as customary stops), but someone's added "highway=bus_stop" tags yet not marked the Naptan node as verified. Needs a survey. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:16 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 87603 | 1 | 2013-12-18 00:14 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Check spelling of road name - OS Locator name differs from originally surveyed name. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:16 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2025-06-19 09:28 | commented | Charlie Money ♦4 | Surveyed 19/06/2025, name is correct | ||
| 5 | 2025-06-19 09:28 | closed | Charlie Money ♦4 | closed | ||
| 87612 | 1 | 2013-12-18 00:32 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Check road name - current road name differs from what was originally surveyed. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:16 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 87614 | 1 | 2013-12-18 00:37 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Check road name - current road name differs from what was originally surveyed. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:16 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:32 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 87616 | 1 | 2013-12-18 00:41 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Check road name - current road name differs from what was originally surveyed. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:16 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:31 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 87617 | 1 | 2013-12-18 00:43 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Check road name - current road name differs from what was originally surveyed. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:17 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:31 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 87619 | 1 | 2013-12-18 00:46 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Check road name - current road name differs from what was originally surveyed. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:17 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:31 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 74478 | 1 | 2013-11-15 22:32 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | This "building", and the two "buildings" immediately north and south, look more like fields than buildings on the Bing imagery. Needs an on-the-ground survey. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:16 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:31 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 87624 | 1 | 2013-12-18 01:03 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Check road name - current road name differs from what was originally surveyed. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:17 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 110411 | 1 | 2014-01-31 01:40 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | On the imagery there's what looks like a footpath joining the Rutland Round to the south with the bridleway to the north. I'm therefore assuming that only the northeastern part of the bridleway is part of the LDFP, but it'll need a survey to confirm exactly how they join. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:17 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 121488 | 1 | 2014-02-20 01:39 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | I'm guessing that this is supposed to join the two roads, but is it really a footpath and if so what access rights are there? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:17 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 126323 | 1 | 2014-02-28 20:19 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Needs a survey to determine exactly what the access rights are here. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:17 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 126343 | 1 | 2014-02-28 21:15 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | It seems odd that the access rights here are bicycle/horse=permissive rather than yes on this tertiary road. Is there some special signage here, or is should it really be omitted (with an implicit "yes")? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5106878/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5106645/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5106772/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49911456 | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:17 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 130000 | 1 | 2014-03-06 00:45 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Does the Nisa Extra go further south than this? Is the Greenhill Guest House between Colledge Street and Shaw Street? Is the parking behind Nisa Extra only? Check shop to N. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:18 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 130005 | 1 | 2014-03-06 01:02 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Granwood Flooring and Granfix products are west of here. Which building is which? Is it all one site or several? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:18 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 145061 | 1 | 2014-04-04 12:15 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Exactly how does this footpath join the road here? Previously at ran through the pub (unlikely). I've picked a possible route based on Bing imagery, but needs a proper survey. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:18 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 146213 | 1 | 2014-04-06 14:31 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Needs survey - how do the footpath, stream and edge of the wood relate to each other? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:18 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 146546 | 1 | 2014-04-07 01:24 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Both the "path" east of here and the footpath west of here appear to be tracks of some sort. Also what are the access rights? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:18 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 147416 | 1 | 2014-04-08 23:38 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Chasewater - need to check whether the cycleway here really is named "Local Cycle Route". it seems unlikely. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:18 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:30 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 151821 | 1 | 2014-04-16 19:13 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Needs a survey - it appears from the imagery that this cycleway joins the roads at either end and also in the middle - is this the case? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:18 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:29 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 152650 | 1 | 2014-04-18 12:42 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | As mapped, things are a bit implausible here (roads cross but don't meet, for example). I suspect that the layout is actually similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2798724928 , but needs a survey to see if the road to the northwest is actually divided (and to correctly identify the "highway=road" up there too). | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:19 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:29 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 161048 | 1 | 2014-05-01 20:46 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | As with notes 161044 and 161046 further down, this road doesn't seem to exist either. The imagery just suggests a turn lane on the A158. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:19 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:29 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 161072 | 1 | 2014-05-01 22:24 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There are no GPS traces to confirm, but presumably the footpath from the north joins the road through the trees? Also the imagery suggests that the footpath from the south joins to the west of the current position. Does the second footpath from the south exist? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:19 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:29 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 161074 | 1 | 2014-05-01 22:31 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Is there perhaps some duplication here (service road vs footpath)? Also do the two footpaths join N of the churchtard where they cross? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:19 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:29 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 161077 | 1 | 2014-05-01 22:33 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | There's an untagged way that joins two footpaths here. Is it supposed to represent a section that's impassable, or a footpath, or something else? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 19:19 | closed | الاحترام ♦87 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:28 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 2306269 | 1 | 2020-08-13 15:50 | opened | TheEditor101 ♦117 | Not sure of the extent of it, but there's currently construction going on here. New housing I believe. | |
| 2 | 2021-09-23 08:48 | commented | jambamkin ♦1,601 | It's now visible on Esri imagery, so added what looks like the full extent of it, keeping the note open to watch construction and update as needed | ||
| 3 | 2021-09-23 13:24 | commented | TheEditor101 ♦117 | Thanks, not in the area currently, but have added a stub of the road connecting on the south side as there was a junction there last time I was around (and some new traffic calming somewhere along that minor/unclassified stretch of road to be surveyed) | ||
| 4 | 2022-01-03 08:46 | commented | FlawOfAverages ♦505 | I've (extremely roughly) added the buildings/roads I can see on imagery and they can be improved in the future. | ||
| 5 | 2023-11-23 11:38 | commented | Weiers Coetser ♦63 | There's quite a bit of development that has been completed in this area in the meantime (Including in the area around the Rowett South Roads. I've been surveying the area and taking Mapillary images and have added some new road infrastructure, but I've not gathered enough data to feel confident about the details of the new houses. Will go back for some more street-level data soon. | ||
| 6 | 2023-12-12 16:11 | commented | Weiers Coetser ♦63 | I think I've now added all the houses, including one or two that do not yet show up on aerial images. Added street numbers, and Mapillary images. The development has no moved across the road to Hopecroft View, but probably not enough details to map that yet. | ||
| 7 | 2024-12-31 14:18 | closed | eliza2011 | |||
| 8 | 2024-12-31 14:22 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 9 | 2024-12-31 14:25 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | @eliza2011 I've reopened this note because it looks like you closed it but didn't explain why or make any edits to OSM following survey that would result in notes being closed. Maybe your just confused about notes appearing on the map and want to turn them off? If so, there's a tickbox in the layer selector - use that to no longer see notes. | ||
| 10 | 2024-12-31 17:07 | commented | Weiers Coetser ♦63 | This is a bit confusing. I had not only surveyed, but drawn practically all the houses and roads, and house numbers for that area before closing the note. I need to find time to go back to the hopecroft view across the road from hopetoun grange to map the houses that would have been developed there by now. | ||
| 11 | 2024-12-31 17:12 | commented | Weiers Coetser ♦63 | Oh sorry, I saw tht SomeoneElse was talking to eliza2011 - not me :-D | ||
| 12 | 2024-12-31 17:18 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Aha - so the note closure here (around Cuthbertson Grove) refers to a set of houses that are now complete (actually, the Bing imagery just catches the end of construction), but the "Hopecroft View" ones are still under construction. Thanks @Weiers Coetser ! @eliza2011 If you're marking notes as complete because they no longer apply any more, because the thing that the note applies to has been added, then (a) that's perfectly OK, and welcome, and (b) it helps to add some text that says that use you resolve the note. Thanks all! | ||
| 3581693 | 1 | 2023-03-02 17:55 | opened | --- | Y&NMR Boundary Stone is on wall near exit from car park | |
| 2 | 2024-12-14 18:27 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | It's not immediately obvious where it is... | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-20 20:50 | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | It might be a couple of meters up on the wall north of this note. Needs checking in daylight though. | ||
| 4 | 2025-01-08 18:34 | closed | eteb3 ♦1,009 | Added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/762138831 | ||
| 4485488 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-10-19 17:09 | opened | SomeoneElseSC ♦363 | cozy post box via StreetComplete 59.2 Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/247149.jpg | |
| 2 | 2024-12-06 07:28 | closed | RedAuburn ♦5,625 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2205040385 | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-06 09:06 | reopened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | |||
| 4 | 2024-12-06 09:07 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Oops - forgot about this one! https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/247149.jpg | ||
| 4534800 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-27 14:09 | opened | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Local press is reporting that the Wellington https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126856786 has closed again. Apparently it's the usual Sam Smith's story - piece of paper in the window saying "Management couple required". | |
| 2 | 2024-12-01 23:37 | closed | SomeoneElse ♦6,224 | Yes, this is shut. |