| Note | # | Tmstmp UTC | Event | Contributor | Comment | Auto-translation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4957811 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-11 23:43 | opened | Kokosnøtt ♦2 | Er ikke denne veien fra Flyplassvegen opp til Frits C. Riebers veg riksveg 580? Sånn jeg ser det fra Statens Vegvesen sitt kart. Fra rundkjøringen mellom Fanavegen og Flyplassvegen og ned til Rådalskrysset vises det som fylkesvei 546, og ikke RV580, som det nå er klassifisert som på OSM. https://vegkart.atlas.vegvesen.no/#kartlag:geodata/@-33633,6723904,13/hva:hva%5B0%5D%5BabsoluteIntervals%5D=false&hva%5B0%5D%5Bid%5D=704/valgt:1017626093:704 | Is this not the road from Flyplassvegen up to Frits C. Riebers veg, national road 580? That's how it appears from the Norwegian Public Roads Administration's map. From the roundabout between Fanavegen and Flyplassvegen and down to Rådalskrysset, it is shown as county road 546, and not RV580, as it is now classified as on OSM. |
| 2 | 2025-09-11 23:48 | commented | Kokosnøtt ♦2 | Eventuelt hvor slik info hentes, om kartet ikke er oppdatert :)) | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-08 20:39 | commented | Gazer75 ♦581 | Vegane her er sett slik det er forventa at framtidig system vil vere og for betre ruting. Det kan ta år før vegar er omregulerte og overført til framtidig eigar. Under arbeidet er så var anleggsvegane i NVDB merka med nummer som vi så brukte når vegen var ferdig. Om ein går inn på https://vegkart.atlas.vegvesen.no og søker på Vegmyndighet (922) så kan ein sjå alle slike vegar som er i prosess. Gamle E39 frå Hopskrysset til Ulven er fortsatt skilta som E39 og burde vel kanskje difor fortsatt vere trunk og ref=E39. Same for delen forbi Lagunen som er skilta 580. Var vel ikkje forventa at dei skulle bruke fleire år på prosessen når ein tagga om vegane. | ||
| 4892513 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-04 20:06 | opened | Aardjon ♦105 | The hut is currently tagged as "shelter" (because that was the type of the POI I replaced). I am wondering if it should better be a "tourism=wilderness_hut" because it provides a fireplace (see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type%3Dbasic_hut). Or is there some agreemant to use "shelter" instead for these huts in Norway? | |
| 2 | 2025-08-05 16:56 | commented | Fjellrev ♦1,789 | I am not Norwegian so I can of course not write for the Norwegian community, but in my eyes wilderness_hut would be completely wrong and I would not even map it as basic_hut (or if so at least with a note that is not for overnight stays). Why? These shelter or hut types are for overnight stays and this is not allowed here. That it has a fireplace can be mapped separately. Normally if you are looking for information about a hut it is probably more interesting if you can stay there over night than if it has a fireplace (which most huts in northern Europe have). | ||
| 3 | 2025-08-14 15:30 | commented | Aardjon ♦105 | Thanks for the explanation. I was wondering if the "overnight stay is forbidden" influences the object type, or if we should just map that there is a real fully closed hut (vs. a simple shelter). Is there something like an "overnight_stay=no" tag? | ||
| 4 | 2025-10-08 20:17 | commented | Gazer75 ♦581 | https://www.fjordnorway.com/en/inspiration/visit-the-day-trip-cabins-in-fjord-norway | ||
| 4939344 Category: LocusMap | 1 | 2025-08-31 14:47 | opened | --- | closed, private road #LocusMap | |
| 2 | 2025-10-07 07:29 | closed | Gazer75 ♦581 | Access=destination added at the farmyard to prevent any through traffic. | ||
| 4774564 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-05-25 10:20 | opened | Aceitix ♦1 | "Because of the carrier the road doesn't go through anymore." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-04-18T15:38:17Z POI has no name POI types: highway-unclassified #organicmaps android | |
| 2 | 2025-10-06 11:13 | closed | Gazer75 ♦581 | |||
| 4810747 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-17 19:53 | opened | stillhart ♦78 | supercharger seems to be finished but I can't pinpoint the exact location https://x.com/TeslaCharging/status/1934453462663888980 where are these houses? | |
| 2 | 2025-10-06 06:32 | closed | Gazer75 ♦581 | Charger is in OSM | ||
| 4942768 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-02 08:55 | opened | --- | Visited this location in August 2025. No busstop found, no bus traffic. Busstop not found on vy.no. | |
| 2 | 2025-10-06 06:30 | closed | Gazer75 ♦581 | Vy dont run local busses here so obviously cant be found. Local bus 363 runs this route on school days. https://entur.no/kart/stoppested?id=NSR:StopPlace:15875 | ||
| 4832327 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | 2025-06-30 13:16 | opened | david82 ♦130 | ATM Missing #OsmAnd | |
| 2 | 2025-10-06 06:26 | closed | Gazer75 ♦581 | Added to the bank node | ||
| 4830475 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-29 06:23 | opened | Stine123 | Fartsgrense øker til 80 | Speed limit increases to 80 |
| 2 | 2025-10-06 06:19 | commented | Gazer75 ♦581 | Er det ikkje 50 eit stykke inn i tunnelen også? Var det før. | ||
| 4939408 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-31 15:24 | opened | anchr ♦12 | Unable to answer "Is there a crossing here?" – https://osm.org/node/5390706534 via StreetComplete 61.3: Stikkvei som tar av mot vest er egentlig ikke noen skikkelig kjørevei, så det er bilene som krysser fortauet her, ikke forgjengere som krysser kjørevei. | |
| 2 | 2025-09-15 08:01 | commented | norgis ♦49 | Det er nedsenket kantstein, og derfor tilrettelagt for kryssing med kjøretøy her. Det er altså vei som krysser gangveg, og det er derfor riktig at det ligger inne en stikkvei her. Kjørende har vikeplikt for fotgjengere etc. på gangveg, og det blir riktig å tagge som umerket kryssing. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=63.41631&lng=10.3531601&z=17&pKey=542912354768038&focus=photo&x=0.856009689236414&y=0.5835381695512745&zoom=0 | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-15 09:30 | commented | Gazer75 ♦581 | Vegen burde også vere service. Det er ein tilkomstveg for burettslaget og privat. Det vil også redusere sjansen for at ruting motorar brukar vegen. | ||
| 4741647 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-04 11:22 | opened | Visaman ♦17 | Is these underground tunnels suppposed to be visible like this? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 13:16 | commented | Fjellrev ♦1,789 | They are mapped as waterway=canal which would be correct if they are only partially filled with water, but I guess they are more likely waterway=pressurised. I do not know the situation on place, but some sections in the area are mapped like that so I guess it might be correct to change the whole network accordingly. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-06 04:30 | commented | Gazer75 ♦581 | All water have pressure. There is pressure at the bottom of the lake even, but it is not a pressurised lake :) These tunnels are fairly flat and the drop usually happens right at the point where the raw tunnel turns into a actual pipe. The pressure is created at the near vertical final drop down to the turbines. | ||
| 4 | 2025-05-06 17:44 | commented | Fjellrev ♦1,789 | Thanks, that was how I was thinking it is and as I knew about the norwegian hydro-power by now (I was working in that business for a while back home in Switzerland). I might fix it in the time coming. | ||
| 5 | 2025-05-07 15:11 | closed | Fjellrev ♦1,789 | Resolved with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165943797 by noteSolver_plugin/0.5.0 | ||
| 6 | 2025-05-08 07:14 | reopened | Gazer75 ♦581 | |||
| 7 | 2025-05-08 07:18 | commented | Gazer75 ♦581 | I think you misunderstood me. There is pressure in a lake or river as well, but that doesn't mean its pressurized. So neither is the tunnel. That is why I tag them as flooded instead. The "pressure" is created in the penstock if you want to call it pressurized. | ||
| 8 | 2025-05-08 14:55 | commented | Fjellrev ♦1,789 | Hi Gazer75 Well I think I understood you correctly but we probably read the wiki in a different way. Have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dflooded and the two pages linked from there for pressurised or canal As I understand it pressurised is used when there is no air in the tunnel - so if the intake is below the level of the lake. It does not mean that there is a "high" pressure, it is enough with the static pressure of the water over the whole surface of the tunnel. But of course I can be wrong - even if I do not think so (Well, who does ;-) ) | ||
| 9 | 2025-05-09 07:02 | commented | Visaman ♦17 | Then,- all of your power plant imports should be changed to waterway=pressurised in stead of waterway=canal Gazer75? | ||
| 10 | 2025-05-10 09:16 | commented | Gazer75 ♦581 | What is the difference between flooded and pressurized then? If a tunnel is flooded there should be no air in it right? It wouldn't be flooded if there was :) And if you want to be really picky there is always air in there to act as a damper. They build a chamber/tunnel for this purpose. | ||
| 11 | 2025-05-13 17:55 | commented | Fjellrev ♦1,789 | Well I guess flooded and pressurised should not be compared in this case as flooded is more generic and then it comes to waterway=pressurised (When the tunnel is completely filled with water) or waterway=canal (When the tunnel is not completely filled with water). So it is always tunnel=flooded and then waterway=pressurised/canal depending on the waterlevel. About the surge tanks (What are they called in Norwegian, in German they are called Wasserschloss), at least I am very aware of them and that they are partially containing air - I have been working in that business for about 15 years. | ||
| 12 | 2025-11-11 21:23 | closed | harahu ♦2,687 | The tunnels aren't visible anymore, so I guess we can close the note. | ||
| 4325637 | 1 | 2024-07-09 07:15 | opened | --- | road and bridge are closed #OsmAnd | |
| 2 | 2025-04-07 16:32 | commented | eisa01 ♦1,054 | Kan se ut på vegbilder som det ikke er noen vei til rasteplassen her, men et spørsmål hvordan man kommer seg til bygningene vest for Glåmsmyrvegen https://vegbilder.atlas.vegvesen.no?year=2024&lat=63.12712373&lng=8.37397154&view=image&imageId=Vegbilder_360_2024.2024-07-24T13.09.07_EV00039_S14D1_m03801_360_2&zoom=16 | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-10 04:05 | commented | Gazer75 ♦581 | Gamle vegen over brua som er "stengt". Vegen til nummer 2558 er der. | ||
| 4 | 2025-04-28 16:30 | commented | harahu ♦2,687 | Hvordan er den stengt? Er det en port eller noe? | ||
| 5 | 2025-05-11 12:12 | closed | harahu ♦2,687 | En ser blokker på flyfotto fra 2017. Har lagt disse til og lukker notatet. | ||
| 4628401 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-15 18:39 | opened | --- | 300kw charger | |
| 2 | 2025-03-12 00:07 | closed | Gazer75 ♦581 | already mapped | ||
| 4132265 | 1 | 2024-02-29 07:53 | opened | Oskarst_ ♦1,985 | Ny forbindelse etter utbygging av Øvstetunsvegen 1 mangler i tilgjengelige flyfoto eller N50. | |
| 2 | 2025-03-11 23:57 | closed | Gazer75 ♦581 | Fiksa | ||
| 4660258 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-11 08:23 | opened | --- | Denne veien er stengt for biltrafikk med bom | This road is closed to vehicular traffic with a toll booth |
| 2 | 2025-03-11 08:26 | commented | Ole Olyckan | Denne veien er stengt for biltrafikk med bom | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-11 23:48 | closed | Gazer75 ♦581 | Bom/sperring var allereie på plass |