Note Activities of RaphaelPasloin

Note	#	⏱️ Last updated	Event	Contributor	Comment
5513159 Category: Unknown	1	~ 22 hours ago	opened	---	skate park
	2	~ 21 hours ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Déjà sur la carte, les notes ne sont pas un bookmark , merci. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238740537
5501090 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 days ago	opened	puristsinger	Road closed for most cars. Looks like there is a passcode to lower the bumps blocking the way.
	2	~ 6 days ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Have you seen this? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/75223660
	3	~ 6 days ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I found the two rising bollards and added them. But it looks like we have an impossible routing situation on the map. There are bollards here and on Avenue de Saint-Job/Sint-Jobselan. Bus 41 passes here and buses can lower the bollards; cyclists and pedestrians may also pass easily. But motor traffic seems to be allowed to enter the southern loop along this road on weekdays: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9709656 The situation is unclear: is it a dead-end road for cars? The only recent pictures I could find were taken during the weekend. Could anyone clarify what motor vehicles coming from Avenue du Réservoir/Vergaarbaklaan are allowed to do in this area during weekdays? + We’ll probably have to add an explicit tag for emergency vehicles here.
	4	~ 1 day ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	motor vehicle are allowed on weekday from/to Avenue du Réservoir - Vergaarbaklaan effectivly like conditional restriction is actualy set : https://panoramax.osm.be/?focus=pic&map=17/50.799186/4.383017&pic=45d51712-95ac-4fb0-819c-7db3f0555e4c&seq=8e93025c-e04f-44fe-830c-f3829c7a8e3e&speed=250&theme=default&users=default&xyz=183.67/-4.45/4
5506319 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 days ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Elevator 0;-1 https://panoramax.osm.be/?date_from=2026-08-07&focus=map&map=18.1/50.826492/4.346862&pic=5be4271a-9333-41c2-adef-5b2c9e7f0b67&seq=644a9f00-9564-46ee-bca4-46cee3850785&speed=250&users=default&xyz=148.59/-21.91/30 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2065726307418005
	2	~ 3 days ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Nice pictures, thanks! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14162456428
5498336 Category: Unknown	1	~ 8 days ago	opened	JhowieNitnek ♦538	Fence has beed placed here
	2	~ 4 days ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Indeed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1556813234
	3	~ 4 days ago	reopened	JhowieNitnek ♦538
	4	~ 4 days ago	commented	JhowieNitnek ♦538	Not a temporary fence but a new permanent fence
	5	~ 4 days ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Do I understand that they are building a permanent structure to shield the building? What I mapped is what can be seen on this picture, taken last week by Raphaël. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1581473706721638 I only found this: https://www.regiedergebouwen.be/nl/downloads/de-regie-der-gebouwen-rondt-restauratie-voorgevel-brusselse-justitiepaleis-af
	6	~ 4 days ago	commented	JhowieNitnek ♦538	Herèon this Linkedin post of the Buildings Agency you can clearly see a new permanent fence: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/regiedesbatiments-palaisdejustice-bruxelles-ugcPost-7498726314183593984-9sBv/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAACKvg48BCqaIJnA4YnA4pY8onKmJMRNr3JE
	7	~ 4 days ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	I have made several another non 3d pictures in mapillary and panoramax around 5 September and some "stolen" picture end Augustus. (the place is not legaly accessible for now) The fence is not finished on the "anchor" of the building (Siamu asked to keep a distance beetween the lateral of the building and the fence, after that CRMS ask to change the anchrage, but non of 2 design looks like corresponding from ground situation). To draw it proprely we need to have access here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470180749 to make more pictures. Workers keep to say September for the end of the works but we are in Belgium ; when someone say it's inaugurate ; lets presume that's mean works are not finished but politician need articles and when construction workers say september ask another one ;-) I have planed another survey end of the month , if it's open (realy) ping me i can make a detour for that.
5502495 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 days ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Rue dupont connect the tram track instead the road. But the question is witch road to connect ? Service road for bus and taxi or https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/312657252. There is F18 before and after https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1517438176402696 Legal text say : "Les autres véhicules peuvent traverser le site spécial franchissable pour (...) et dans les carrefours" https://securotheque.wallonie.be/equipements/signalisation-c/verticale/de-police/f18-signaux-indication and 36202 MONITEUR BELGE — 20.06.2011 − Ed. 2 — BELGISCH STAATSBLAD that is tha latest coordinate of this part of 76.2 I was thinking (wrongly) that to cross a "site spécial franchissable" we needed a damier composées de carrés blancs but it's not a law requeriement , only a recommandation 77.8. <Inséré par AR 1997-07-16/32, art. 14, 2°; En vigueur : 01-10-1997> Des marques en damier composées de carrés blancs peuvent être apposées sur le sol. A vehicle comming from here : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=986793594048344 can legaly turn left to go here : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173634167 and same from https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=986619370681627 to go Rue Dupont. continus withe line are inexistant there. Or i have missed something ? Less problematic for routing , the section crossing Rue Royale of this one : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14192252/ should be oneway=no (it's a edge case but technicaly if no u-turn restriction this should be both way.
	2	~ 5 days ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	This is a very complicated intersection, thanks for spotting those special cases. Indeed, left turns are legal and the map did not reflect that. This should fix the situation for both cases: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1556553263 To clarify about white lines: only the classical white line between normal car lanes (15 cm) is something that may never be crossed. The white line along a busway having an F18 sign is thicker (20 or 25 cm) and is the same as the white line along parking spaces (the name is something like "bord fictif de la chaussée") and it may be crossed to reach a driveway, a garage or a parking spot. And it may be crossed across intersections because technically a F18 sign ceases its effect at the beginning of the intersection even if the lines are painted all along. Also fixed the U-turn on the other intersection: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1556553808
5496234 Category: Unknown	1	~ 9 days ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Platform refurbished ; + crossing is on south now. part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23170194/history is no a shared sidewalk. No 360 available but mapillary regular dateFrom=2026-06-06 on both direction show the change Imagerie aérienne Digitaal Vlaanderen préliminaire (march 2026) show all.
	2	~ 8 days ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Thanks for the notification. I made a few changes here, for the tram platforms, the crossings, the traffic signals, the cycle track… A second look is always welcome…
	3	~ 8 days ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	I just have added a traffic signals on crossing and update tags for cycleway=* on main road. I thinks all important thinks are ok now thanks.
5496505 Category: Unknown	1	~ 9 days ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	From my understanding of actual situation, former bus lane now a cycleway must connect only Rue du Grand Cerf not Waterloo from north east https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=925653210603121
	2	~ 6 days ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Very true, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1062952936
5486413 Category: Unknown	1	~ 13 days ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	This is not the shape of future new building but the shape of old "company apartment" (logements de fonction) previously operated by SNCB . (previously mapped in 1 bloc and user deleted it and address when creating the constrution zone) https://osmcha.org/changesets/166603406 No usable source was found for new shape but it will be a large building.
	2	~ 13 days ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Here is a temporary fix for this: 1) Instead of buliding=construction, mark those 5 small shapes as old buildings: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1551719578 2) Until something is visible, just a landuse=construction https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388732821 And we wait until we can spot something here (or until UrbIS gets updated) to start drawing the new building. OK for you?
	3	~ 12 days ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Yes perfect solution. Thanks for the fix in : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188237654 I just noticed that another building is also demolished : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025503545 and a part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261448731 (the most of demolished part is not on UrbisAdmin) I have also extended the landuse construction and retaged it as construction=commercial with this data : https://openpermits.brussels/fr/_13/IPE/1868115 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188282620 We can close the note, thanks for the changes here and the inputs.
5482448 Category: Unknown	1	~ 15 days ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	House number 8 exist : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2083212595537406
	2	~ 14 days ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10048755864
5472698 Category: Unknown	1	~ 20 days ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	A living street with foot=no is quite inusual, probably a old tag from works, looks open on last mapillary : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=766122186466986
	2	~ 19 days ago	commented	H4N5-antw ♦2,001	Dear @Raphael, Thank you for picking this up: there's a long history of slow-paced re-arranging this former tertiary highway; the tag foot=no seems to have been added together with bicycle=use-sidepath, but at a time the former cyclepath had been re-categorised as footway; while we're at it: re-align some building outlines from earlier aerial photos to GRB, either add all parking, or none; look at planting: neither village green nor planter, nor flower-bed ... what then?
	3	~ 19 days ago	commented	H4N5-antw ♦2,001	... natural=shrubbery?
	4	~ 15 days ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	can be shrubbery yes. Object of this note is now solved thanks for the fix.
5482279 Category: Unknown	1	~ 15 days ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Ce footway a un explicite bicycle=no hors il y a plusieurs relations vélo qui l'utilise, soit ça doit entre bicycle=yes soit la relation prend un autre chemin.
	2	~ 15 days ago	commented	Jakka ♦34,655	je pense même que le "cycleway" au milieu n'est pas correcte. Je envoyer message au mapper qui a modifier footway en cycleway. Voir image https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=604144975101235
5479365 Category: Unknown	1	~ 16 days ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	2.2.12 (...) (opus citatum dans plusieurs de mes notes antérieure) Il existe de nombreux espaces particuliers pour lesquels il n’y a pas d’obligation d’attribution d’une adresse officielle. C’est le cas, par exemple, des espaces verts, des terrains de jeux, d’installations récréatives ou sportives, d’aires de pique-nique, de sites touristiques, … Dans ces espaces, même constitués de peu de choses, séjournent parfois momentanément de nombreuses personnes. Il est dès lors prudent de leur attribuer une adresse officielle pour indiquer sans équivoque leur situation et ainsi permettre un accès plus aisé en cas d’urgence (ambulance, pompiers, police, …) ou pour des services techniques (entretien, Cette station service à bien une adresse officielle , il n'y a aucune raison de retirer l'adresse ici https://kbopub.economie.fgov.be/kbopub/toonvestigingps.html?vestigingsnummer=2184855417 Le guide parle également d'éléments techniques etc et des raisons pour laquelle on peut attribuer une adresse, l'absence de bâtiment ne justifie pas toujours le retrait de l'addresse dans osm.
	2	~ 16 days ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14112085335
5270638 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	kr11 ♦1	Bakery is closed, business no longer there
	2	~ 4 months ago	commented	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	shop=vacant do you need help to map it?
	3	~ 4 months ago	closed	kr11 ♦1	I'm new to this, trying to get into OSM editing. I changed the tag. Is that enough? (No need to define the type of business that used to be there?). I will go there in the next few days to see if any new business is there. tx
	4	~ 4 months ago	reopened	Thierry1030 ♦6,264
	5	~ 4 months ago	commented	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	First of all, welcome to the wonderful world of OSM(-editing)!! :-) To keep track of changes on a location we use "life cycle prefixes" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) If you have other questions about tagging, you nearly find everything in the wiki ;-) In this case I still have 2 remarks: 1) use the tag was:name=* + was:shop=bakery 2) if a POI is located with an address tag, the POI doens't need an address tag. In this case you can remove all the address tags ...
	6	~ 2 months ago	commented	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	1) remove these tags: - addr:city=Haasrode - addr:housenumber=6 - addr:postcode=3053 - addr:street=Armand Verheydenstraat 2) rename this tag: was:name=Govaerts-Gilis was:shop=bakery
	7	~ 1 month ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187169054
5394966 Category: Unknown	1	~ 1 month ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	The park is indicated as public in OSM , and presented as such on the inauguration, suspicious access here on path. #surveyneeded if it have changed or not #trustmebro edit here.
	2	~ 1 month ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.bruxelles.be/sites/default/files/bxl/dolto2014.pdf (inauguration , indicate public) Listed as public on opendata : https://opendata.brussels.be/explore/dataset/parcs_et_jardins_publics/table/?flg=fr-fr&sort=postalcode And finaly signage confirm opening hours already set on the playground. https://panoramax.osm.be/?focus=pic&map=17/50.846547/4.34205&pic=ad21612e-a7b8-4b96-894e-41952b6e3f49&seq=3c8044b7-da91-41f7-8e26-55f7e5235e3b&speed=250&theme=default&users=metacatalog&xyz=28.37/-12.93/49 That being said, footway is probaly better than path here. Fixed by changeset : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187167520
5444854 Category: Organicmaps	1	~ 1 month ago	opened	anislambo ♦6	"Ne fonctionne plus " OSM snapshot date: 2026-06-24T00:53:17Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-drinking_water #organicmaps ios 2026.07.23-6-ios
	2	~ 1 month ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5444291 has been fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187138434
5431353 Category: Unknown	1	~ 1 month ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Changeset: 177305500 no crossing here ? just a speed table ? : crossing in db for 13 years and even improved 2 years ago ... (no need to restore the bicycle=no) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1032111619126217
	2	~ 1 month ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	You are right. There is a normal zebra crossing. I think I reverted the wrong object of a bad changeset… Fixed here, thanks.
5414314 Category: Unknown	1	~ 1 month ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Impossible oneway here (on the cross over) i think it's 2 direction on it. btw https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1518706970 is NOT oneway for sure : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1831794140728284 (the oneway on Ch de Watermael begin 20 meters after
	2	~ 1 month ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Closing will redo
5375602 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	parking:both:access=private seams not correct ; i have see this patern on many streets of the area (Axe Evere / WSL) Looks like it's came from the mecanical edit of new street parking scheme conversion, where the parking:condition:both=residents was set. Don't think there is a lot of this restrictions in public space in Brussels btw.
	2	~ 2 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I agree there is a problem here. AFAIK, those parking space are not reserved for residents, everyone may park here, but residents are exempted from paying. So, it should not be an "access" but a "fee" condition here. I’ll try to see in the next days how many situations like this we have and if we can retag them all at once or if they’d better be reviewed individually.
	3	~ 2 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	That changed recently , residents need to buy a card now (even it's cheap for private use of public space, there is a fee) : https://evere.brussels/fr/demarches/stationnement/cartes-de-stationnement https://www.woluwe1200.be/carte_riverain/
5378180 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	The 2 bicycle shed are missplaced, one is in Vandervleet and anothe one near Charles Woeste, easy to fix but need to check witch one is whitch (ref name)
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	JuanjoMC ♦82	They are not. The one that was located on Rue Jacques Vandervleet moved to the parvis when the street has been reworked. They are now next to each other. See here: https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?pic=943c7b9e-0cdb-42cd-a7e6-0b238bfc438e
5373422 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	malte1030 ♦575	scuplutre "Rivalité" de Profant Wenzel. c.f. https://collections.heritage.brussels/fr/objects/53346
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Added thanks https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185072873
5365097 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Rue Gray - Graystraat 118 1050 Ixelles according to Urbis and the universal postal operator Etterbeek according to https://ccff02.minfin.fgov.be/geoservices/arcgis/services/WMS/Cadastral_Layers/MapServer/WmsServer?: - Municipality https://databrussels.be/en/id/address/1669240 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4380508915535421
	2	~ 2 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	One more discrepancy, indeed. Any suggestion to decide?
	3	~ 2 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	As the Municipality border is higher in terms of hierarchy of norms and moving it it's a big no way i think that Urbis and Bpost are wrong here. As housenumbers are aka "police" number (in sence of admin power) i have searched from with police zone the 118 depend and it's : https://www.police.be/5343/fr/contact/votre-quartier/quartier-jourdan?number=118&street=109727 Also if you take the street "section" https://databrussels.be/en/id/streetname/1257/1 the house clearly belong to Etterbeek https://www.belgif.be/downloads/best/20211019_Guide_en_mati%C3%A8re_de_constatation_et_attribution_d_adresses.pdf (p 29-30-31) For my understanding the access to the door is in Etterbeek so i suggest to attach it to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3017251 The pbost geocoding is also wrong as they situate the address on the Mussensteteeg and not the first time i see them excactly copying error from Urbis (like this one : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5550347401) We can maybe add a contact:postcode with a note on the address to indicate the discreprenancy even i think 1050 is a error in both db.
	4	~ 2 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	OK and thanks for all the research. We’ll add it to 1040 Etterbeek and report to the Region to ask they clarify this. (Not much hope, as always.) I maintain a list of exceptions to the official dataset, I’ll add it there.
5365156 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Parking name is well signed in fr:nl https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1542674547555839 from Avenue Louise the max clearance is 3.7 m not 1.9 There is another exit (only) here : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=397904806466591 but not realy for the parking (that is situated on part on the "rontonded" building) , it's the exist for delivery truck (probably linked to the Icon Witcher's)
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Well done, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184736221
5363257 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Probably here (3 trees comming from Ch. d'Ettereek) : drinkin water #surveyme https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1507915510644651 (not sure so need to survey)
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1552153666592449 confirmed and working https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184733206
5363274 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Probably here facing the "taxi" logo : drinking water https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2530136273838450 #surveyme
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=940009149095665 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184732535
5358744 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	dancingthroughlife ♦24	I didn't realise the path forked, so the spacing of these benches is wrong (order is correct); the northmost bench and bin should be at the corner of the new path.
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Thanks for the report, i have improved some positon and fixed the picnic table position : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184504318
5355988 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Pedestrian not a living street : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2972563453075505 Don't know how to handle the strange impossible oneway on the pedestrian caused by the planter. in theory (signs) it's oneway except bicycle : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=423166137036641 but praticaly it's impossible for (motor) delivery to respect signs.
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I suggest removing oneway=yes and filling the note tag to explain why. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8511765
5350489 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Pakap08	ppp
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	spam closing
5350490 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Pakap08	ppp
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	spam closing
5350488 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Pakap08	ppp
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	spam closing
5350504 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Pakap08	ppp
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	spam closing
5350487 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Pakap08	ppp
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	spam closing
5350485 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Pakap08	ppp
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	spam closing
5350482 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Pakap08	ppp
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	spam closing
5350483 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Pakap08	ppp
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	spam closing
5350481 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Pakap08	ppp
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	spam closing
5350479 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Pakap08	ppp
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	spam closing
5350503 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Pakap08	ppp
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	spam closing
5350495 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Pakap08	ppp
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	spam closing
5350498 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	Pakap08	ppp
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	spam closing
5349887 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Following of partial revert : Housenumber 119 must also be restored (and probably moved on the 117 building) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12033808352/history https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=462749333044366
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Restored that too, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12033808352
5348353 Category: Unknown	1	~ 2 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	PT Simpson has been refurbished , larger platform with tactile paving and shelter : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1172848233649021
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184222513
5323104 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	joost schouppe ♦4,503	Is the IMI Bizet site still here? It is mentioned here https://www.imisecondaire.be/les-sections/ and is in official data, but not clearly visible on mapillary
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1039423782098440 The sign is half hidden by the recent protests flags so we can presume the response is yes.
	3	~ 2 months ago	reopened	joost schouppe ♦4,503
	4	~ 2 months ago	closed	joost schouppe ♦4,503	OK thanks! Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184123433
5324530 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	JhowieNitnek ♦538	Construction here in done
	2	~ 3 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated, thanks. Not sure if this note is for the entire site or just the ones near this pin. Shall I also update this one? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346862613
	3	~ 2 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Yes building construction is finished : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1669962154256971 Remaining landuse construction is more a brownfiled / greenfield now but still fenced : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2765243113860203
	4	~ 2 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	OK, thanks.
5100512 Category: Unknown	1	~ 8 months ago	opened	---	Lakensestraat 79 & Vander Elststraat 17-19 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243559764 Maçonniek tempelcomplex van Les Vrais Amis de l’Union et du Progrès Réunis https://monument.heritage.brussels/nl/Brussel_Vijfhoek/Lakensestraat/79/32657
	2	~ 8 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Already on the map. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11829570360 I presume the note is about the building itself.
	3	~ 8 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added some heritage tags. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243559701
	4	~ 8 months ago	reopened	Thierry1030 ♦6,264
	5	~ 8 months ago	commented	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	small question: this one is mapped this way > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304918446 shouldn't we keep some coherence?
	6	~ 7 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	The POI for the freemasonry club is here as a node, because this is their "headquarters". Now, about the building: I added the wikimedia_commons tag to this building. But there is a problem about a possible name for the building itself. The only thing I could find online was: "Temple maçonnique - Vrijmetselaarstempel", which is more a description than a name. And https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304918446 has name=Temple maçonnique des Amis philanthropes - Vrijmetselaarstempel van de Cercle des Amis philanthropes My suggestion: use this long text string as `description` for both buildings, and no name.
	7	~ 7 months ago	commented	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	I added description tag to this building > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243559701 and what about this building? > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243559764
	8	~ 7 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Possibly the same description, if that building is also a "temple" and not just "a building they own" but without any ceremonial activity. Alternatively, if binding those two buildings is really wanted, we can remap the freemasonry club into a polygon instead of a node.
	9	~ 7 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Visited the place 2 times on open day : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243559764 is the main area for temples. 243559701 has proably too but not the bigest ones There is in fact many temples and they are not attached in any "loges" (even they use mostly the same for weekly/monthly use). There is also many many other "loges" : https://kbopub.economie.fgov.be/kbopub/zoekadresform.html?postcod1=1000&postgemeente1=&straatgemeente1=RUE+DE+LAEKEN&huisnummer=79&filterEnkelActieve=true&_filterEnkelActieve=on&actionLU=Rechercher Les Amis philanthropes is just one of them. I also think that amenity community_centre is not really adequate here as it's not open to the public , and there is some rules and procedure to be admited.
	10	~ 2 months ago	commented	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	I followed last Thursday a guided tour in the museum AND in the temple complex. This is what I (re)mapped: 1) complex with several temples which are connected whith each other (and also with the museum) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243559764 2) I removed 'Les Amis Philanthropes' which is indeed one of the many 'loges'. I added however the federation that federates many loges (Grand Orient de Belgique) > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13933131855 Still have 1 question: the museum is now mapped as a POI. It is fully located in Maison Dewez (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13541497). Should we keep it mapped as a POI? Thanks for this last clarification. Then we finally can close this note :-)
	11	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Thanks for the survey and the changes here. For your question : yes we must keep it as node , otherwise that will create a name conflict. I think we can close the note. Thank's both.
5339523 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	bicycle=use_sidepath broke the routing for cyclist here, add link or split segment when there is service road/driveway , or remove the tag where cyclist need to take the road to change direction. same for Pater Dupierreuxlaan and probably need to check others segments
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	no more relevant as user choose to use track instead, closing.
5340620 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	There is a lot of "stubb end" sidewalk, missing crossings parts and missing sidewalk connection. The aera has been refurbished , no aerial availlable but we have a recent mapillary : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3904902439640460
	2	~ 2 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	That should be much better now, with a continuous pedestrian network + updated cycle infrastructure. Thanks for the reminder.
5326355 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	---	This area, formerly known as "Vanderschrickpark / Park Vanderschrick", has been renamed into "Marie Popin Tuin / Jardin Marie Popin".
	2	~ 3 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Source ? if true there is a typo btw
	3	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	No name signed on entrance (Survey 10/06/26) , anonymous note closing.
5220443 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Heritage=4 on this building seams to me not correct. Heritage=4 is for protected buildings or zone but this building is just one of 40.000 building that is "Inscrit à l’inventaire légal" https://monument.heritage.brussels/fr/Ixelles/Rue_du_Conseil/2/20201 It's explicitly "L’inscription d’un bien à l’inventaire ne constitue pas à proprement parler une mesure de protection mais elle joue un rôle important dans la conservation du patrimoine car elle vise à attirer l’attention des propriétaires et des autorités sur l'intérêt patrimonial de ce bien." https://patrimoine.brussels/agir/aspects-legaux/inventaire-du-patrimoine Maybe also need to precise this here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage#Brussels Statut juridique : Classé depuis le = heritage=4 like this building https://monument.heritage.brussels/fr/buildings/10928 + wikidata is for the bar not for the building , wikimedia is empty.
	2	~ 5 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I agree we should remove bad tags from this buildings. For the wiki, do I understand that we should rewrite the block for Brussels to say something like this? Listed buildings (« classé » / « beschermd » on the heritage website) should have heritage=4. Additional buildings, which are listed in the inventory of remarkable buildings, should not.
	3	~ 5 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	wiki : yes * classé / beschermd * inscription sur la liste de sauvegarde / Ingeschreven op de bewaarlijst ==> on urban brussels they also show the blue shield on their page when it's protected (it's international by unesco convention : https://www.unesco.org/fr/heritage-armed-conflicts/emblem ) and that can be spotted during survey : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1200036975540077 The only "edge" case i see it's when a building is in "procédure de classement" (Arrêté du Gouvernement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale ) : that indicate the begin of the procédure ==> CRM <==> Ubran brussels <==> Minister (or secretary of state) up to 2 years , strictly speaking it's not yet heritage but i can understand some user want to add this way. maybe proposed:* is better in that case.
	4	~ 3 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	User Eebie started a discussion on the Belgian Matrix chat. In this edit, heritage=4 was changed into heritage=inv https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263997011/history/5 Shall we do the same here?
	5	~ 3 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Yes a good idea , that's remove the false information and keep the value indicating it's not a "simple" building.
	6	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	I have see that Eebie start to change the wiki about heritage , the key is not yet on dedicated page but as he start changing that we can close this note, thank's for the focus. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183860236
5321239 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Ce n'est pas un tunnel, c'est une noue, il n'y a que la partie en dessous du chemin piéton qu'on peut considérer comme un tunnel. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=658517479996588 (on y voit d’ailleurs la chambre de visite pour nettoyer une probable grille de filtration) C'est à ciel ouvert et on peut toucher et voir l'eau (faible débit) (celui ci + l'écoulement de l'autre source + la zone humide) (ruisseau à son début et les fluviales du terrain en pente)
	2	~ 3 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	- fluviales + pluviales :=)
	3	~ 3 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	See also my comment here : "And the special technical office confirm : "Le traitement de l’eau pluviale et de l’eau provenant des 2 sources présentes dans le jardin est un point important du projet. Une noue a été créée dans le jardin pour récolter une partie des eaux pluviales et l’eau des sources. Le trop plein de cette noue est évacuée via un caniveau vers un plan d’eau situé sur la placette à la jonction de la rue du Delta et de la rue des Tropiques." on initial note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3867076 website section is down but you can find the initial content here : https://web.archive.org/web/20220927105809/https://www.smartgreen.be/actualites/etude-techniques-speciales-construction-logements-sources-forest-bruxelles Source position , stream position and wetland was added after a ground survey and it's normal to not see on latest aerial a vegitalised wetland. To resolve the problem of intersecting water/footway ; it's probably better to assume it's not a culvert on intersecting point but a bridge like this obvious one : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=876660987509046
	4	~ 3 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Sure. If you made all the research, then you have all the information, feel free to fix it.
	5	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Fixed : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183763072 bridge where we can see the water under and keep culvert where there is manhole visiting chamber.
5326320 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	The municipality border is false according to SPF https://ccff02.minfin.fgov.be/geoservices/arcgis/services/WMS/Cadastral_Layers/MapServer/WmsServer?: - Municipality The reason of this strange situation indicated in changeset 182125783 is that 71 73 75 are not on the correct place and the building passage with 10 steps for17 meters long is also not on the correct place. For 71 it's easy : Take aerial, you will see a small dome on the top of the building : just in front you have 6 rectangle it's the "marquise/auvent" of the hotel. The entreance is just in the middle. (i have make many delivery in the past here), for the building passage as i remember it's straight not oblik as mapped now, 71 is perfectly placed in Urbis Admin so if we take the 73 and 75 : just in the middle it's the building passage (just a part is steps if i recall well) Of course a survey make this more precise but at least we can have the correct border and a more accurate position of the building passage.
	2	~ 3 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	for 71 it's possible that they consider the service road entrance for the post code instead of door position.
	3	~ 3 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I surveyed this area last week, I will upload Panoramax pictures in the next days. Clearly a weird case because if we want to map the address on the entrance while ensuring that reverse geocoding will work we have to cheat with borders, which is not a good idea.
	4	~ 3 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	I got it for the 75 in 1060 It's signed on a door in this building passage https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110605965 W residential with doorbell 360 are under processing.
	5	~ 3 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=27009782645353935
	6	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added nbr 75, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13916999221
5324122 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	On this side of the Avenue du Port : 71A ==> 79A the postcode is 1000 https://databrussels.be/fr/id/address/100297 https://databrussels.be/fr/id/address/994050 + Entrepot 7 in the other side 130 ==> 142 1000 too Other part of Entrepôt and Dieudonné Lefèvre postcode 1020 is correct BUT according to https://opendata.bruxelles.be/explore/dataset/grands_quartiers_vbx/export/?location=15,50.8729,4.35655&basemap=jawg.sunny it's not the former municipality of Laeken actual level 10 with 21004E as statisticalsector tent also to confirm it's not inclued on the zone (south part of the mentionned street are in 21004D)
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Fixed postcode areas. Yes, perhaps it would be interesting to separate Laeken/Laken and postcode 1020 here. Will try to do more research to see if we can find a correct outline.
	3	~ 3 months ago	reopened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483
	4	~ 3 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Bruxelles opendata with geojson and the spf economy server is not accurate for the admin level 10 ?
	5	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183668883 looks good to me (at least for the admin level10, for postcode until we have the correct geocoding on address it's less problematic) Thanks for the fix
5322563 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	According to a guide from Urban.brussels meet on "construction open day", the stream do not follow the Ch. de Bruxelles but is canalised accross the former Abbaye. Unfortunaly the hydrologic atlas completly forget the stream. But the existence was confirmed by the guide and some locals. Most of existing documentation is about the Uccle part. (prilimary research) This note is for consigning any documentation , archive and relevant document for a eventualy changeset. more research needed, will continue on following weeks but every information is welcome.
	2	~ 3 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://etopia.be/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/UNE-BONNE-GESTION-DES-ARCHIVES-POUR-UNE-BONNE-GESTION-DES-EAUX.pdf P15 has a plan of the culvert project. + mention also this plan : Carte topographique et hypsométrique de Bruxelles et ses environs [Document cartographique] dressée à l'échelle de 1/20,000 d'après les plans et documents de l'Etablissement géographique fondé par Ph[ilippe] Vander Maelen par J[oseph] Huvenne dessinateur topographe ; et gravée par J. Ongers https://uurl.kbr.be/bib/16897928 We can see the parcour before they covered it and it's the same as of the vaulting plan. More usable and similar plan is availlable here too : https://historical.osm.be/#17/50.81182/4.32086/Vandermaelen18461854FL-OpenStreetMapRoads Former windmill is near here : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3490637399 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1309975451109257 (the small wall after the tent is where the axe passed) Lets continue search about the culvert itself.
5326388 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	According to Best Address 3-5-9 are in Uccle : https://databrussels.be/fr/id/address/37813/1 https://databrussels.be/fr/id/address/40362/1 https://databrussels.be/fr/id/address/40356/1 I think the reason of not found in vector db it's their weird cutting of zone.
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183654062
5326152 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	From here until Rue Kindermans inclued all the streets on West of Avenue Louise that belong to Bruxelles city are 1000 Bruxelles not 1050
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Indeed, this is very surreal. I modified the postcode areas here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3379410 Will now try to do the other parts.
5326142 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	CP 1000 Bruxelles https://databrussels.be/fr/id/address/2814 https://databrussels.be/fr/id/address/183264
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated border, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3379410 This should cover almost all addresses correctly. I will run an automatic calculation of addresses in the next days and check if this new border area correctly catches all addresses; I will probably do minor fixes to the border or map some addresses as nodes if the middle point of buildings is on the wrong side).
5326133 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	72 signed on the gate : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=849219417617841
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Oh, nice. Added, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10039807578
5326132 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	All address of Avenue Victoria are in 1000 Bruxelles https://databrussels.be/fr/id/address/156872 https://databrussels.be/fr/id/address/23762 + address inside the "Bois de la Cambre" in Bxl + Avenue de la Clairière. Vert Chasseur , Oiseleurs and Vivier d'Oie that belong to Bxl City have aslo Postcode 1000. (following in fact the official border for theses parts)
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11048375 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1526769906
5325593 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Docking station is more to the north : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1686226215848039 11.53 m if you consider the centroid of the posterbox 12.35 m if you consider the little mast.
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Fixed, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/814665378
	3	~ 3 months ago	reopened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483
	4	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	So it's the centroid if i understand well, thank's , that make your move in St Lazare little strange. For your information you indicate in your changeset comment that you reverted the initial position, if you take 2015 imagery you will see that the station has moved, so initial position was not faulty, they just move it. Thanks for the fix.
5324130 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1501836620 (building part) has building:levels 1 , i don't see on witch part of the hotel it's correspond, if i take the other building part it should have building:levels 5 with roof:levels=1 (based on existing data on the map) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=624007996748830 show roof:levels=2 (that must also be inclued on the part with min level) BUT if we take the aerial imagery, it's looks like the roof is flat and what's look like a mansarded roof is in fact a normal level of the hotel) in that case building:levels is 7
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Sorry, my bad, it was supposed to mean the ground floor, but it’s true that the 3D model cannot properly render this and requires to split buildings horizontally (even breaking floors). Fixed.
5321071 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1165479 (Promenade Verte) make a strange detour here. (probably reuse of existing sidewalk to make the path without adapting the members)
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Fixed, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1165479#map=19/50.881986/4.315806
5314937 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	It's still shared with pedestrian : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1304301455101159
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183380703
5314929 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	It's still shared with pedestrian : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1304301455101159
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483
5314936 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	In place of former rouandaround , street connects here : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1704341040600380 From Belgica it's "partialy" open to normal traffic, it's probable they close it time to time but when i pass there it was accessible. The part after the small park is not accessible on the moment, but it's probably preferable to add a vehicle conditional no @ restriction than blocking all the routing (more over when sidewalk are not mapped)
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated road geometry and access tags, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121771990 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168401904
5314726 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	ivanbranco ♦13,704	https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7707020787/history isn't this BXL_02? I'm not even sure BXL_48 exists
	2	~ 3 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Don't know if the ref is realy linkable to a authorative source, but from what i found online 02 seams to be the correct one. Anyway it's mapped on the wrong building : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=960992066688904 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244955899 is the correct one.
	3	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Fixed and relocated here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7707020787 Also interested to know about the source. The author’s website only shows a few ones. There is this map made by volunteers: https://pnote.eu/projects/invaders/map (The data does not come from OSM because it showed the BXL_02 reference before we changed it here.)
5308965 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Impossible oneway (introducted by changeset 182994994 witch reverse one part of the street but not the other). Dont know the last situation (Municipality as often changed the direction here)
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4339614196297557 fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183296413
5312393 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Pedestrian ways : remove noname=yes and add Rue Sainte-Marie - Sint-Mariastraat https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=327537388757418
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183282165
5311938 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	railway=tram make a "zig-zag" here near https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12945234397 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12945234396
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Thanks. And the other track had the same problem. What a horrible edit. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183244967
5309617 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	Geovelo_Notes	Réparateur vélo non répertorié station kit de réparation Photo·s et/ou informations disponibles ici: https://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/125214 (This note has been created from Geovelo)
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Duplicate of : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5309618
5309618 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	Geovelo_Notes	Pompe à vélo non repertorié Photo·s et/ou informations disponibles ici: https://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/125215 (This note has been created from Geovelo)
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	sur osm depuis 3 ans : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10828170469/history
5307024 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Platform extended / refurbished , shelter moved , oild trees removed (some new planted too) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=876418031371813
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated, thanks.
5303035 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Dragged nodes here
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Fixed, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256958475 The situation in this town is a little special: there is currently a new group of users who have been asked to edit OSM as part of a class. I suspect many of them use iD on their phones. That would explain why there are so many dragged nodes in their edits; I guess that users are trying to drag the map and do not realise that their finger selected a node by mistake. It looks like they had their last assignment today, so we should expect less damage from now on.
5296450 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	To doublecheck but i think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6005860 can be deleted , i haven't found any existing or missing address that belong to Brussels for Place Louise - Louizaplein.
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Thanks for the reminder. You might have noticed that I am currently trying to remove duplicates or addresses that belong to the wrong relations. Still a few more to go, this one was still on the list, cannot do everything at once.
	3	~ 3 months ago	reopened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483
	4	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Hello, You might haven't noticed that yesterday early morning i have made a second batch of removing duplicated associatedStreet relation, this one was the last remaining on my list of the day, the reason of the note is that i have notice the relation was changed some days ago (15/05) and i just wonder if i have missed something before deleting it, it was not my intention to make a reminder, just have a double check of someone else and that can be any mappers that know the subject/area. Thanks for the change. Raphael
5295102 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	There is a building here (not on Urbis) with building min level : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1172782700641124
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1514953633
5294832 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	PT platform extended : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=861616872965521 + with access=no on may road , only OSRM don't brake pedestrian routing here, most router yes ; will be great to add sidewalk on same time.
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated platforms https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543722460 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543722461 + full pedestrian routing here
5289165 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	JhowieNitnek ♦538	Passage International/Internationale Doorgang should be located here, it is used as a real address as proved by this permit: https://openpermits.brussels/nl/_14/ICE/432425
	2	~ 3 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	This document is from the 1990s. There was a gallery across the old Martini Tower, which was razed around 2001. The new building hosting Belfius does not contain any passageway, and this address does not exist in the current UrbIS inventory of addresses. IMHO, we should not map this, because it does not exist anymore.
	3	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://legacy.imal.org/martini/Mg1.html for the destrcution timelaps. I confirm there is no more passage existing on Belfius area. ==> openhistoricalmap is probably a better place to map this.
5290241 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Antenne LISA https://etterbeek.brussels/fr/themes/prevention-et-securite/antenne-lisa https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=958581173476062
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13828356198 We already have a few of them, and so far we use dual tagging like office=government + amenity=police, because it's a hybrid type. Until someone finds out how to make it better. ;-)
5290170 Category: Unknown	1	~ 3 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13361748733 Survey needed : To operate a hvac company in RBC you need to have a proove of competence and it's indicated on the BCE, in that case the BCE https://kbopub.economie.fgov.be/kbopub/toonvestigingps.html?vestigingsnummer=2379905391 It's linked to the SEO company that add it and there is no licence, NACEBEL code linked to the attestation. + Website is empty. Looks like inexisting , check if at least company name is writen somewhere here.
	2	~ 3 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Not found. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/347542.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/347543.jpg
	3	~ 3 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Removed this business from the map. Probably just an official address, no visible sign anywhere.
5287517 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	bxl-forever ♦5,963	The city announced the street should have traffic in the opposite direction from May 2026. Survey needed. (This includes myself.)
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	It's confirmed : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182592562 + the parking (that nobody respect) is also reversed. Thanks for the note.
5285955 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	From last aerial / and Urbis / GRB the building here exist and don't seams to be removed. (ajout details edit ... )
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Restored building (GRB and UrbIS are slightly offset → drawn from GRB) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339801249
5089342 Category: Unknown	1	~ 8 months ago	opened	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	https://www.citydev.brussels/nl/nieuws/canalcity-anderlecht-ons-9de-kmo-park add name=CanalCity
	2	~ 8 months ago	commented	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32519773
	3	~ 8 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added, thanks.
	4	~ 8 months ago	reopened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483
	5	~ 8 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	"Le parc est implanté sous une école primaire, une école secondaire et une crèche." : https://www.citydev.brussels/fr/actualites/canalcity-notre-9eme-parc-pme-anderlecht It a part of the Deleers Project : https://www.bambelgium.be/fr/canalcity/ Here is the perimeter of the global project : https://openpermits.brussels/fr/_01/PFD/1793088 https://www.campusdeleers.be/images/plan.png canalcity is the green part and a part under the actual building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1425075932 actual mapped area is used by Tondeur Diffusion (walcourt 110 and Frans van Kalken 9) and office for multiple company in 9A
	6	~ 4 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	The "green part" on the picture is now here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20624480 I don’t see how we can do it better, about the part from the other building. Shall we close this note?
	7	~ 4 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Good and pragmatic solution, we can close now, thanks both of you.
3884518	1	~ 3 years ago	opened	---	il y a une Chapelle Calvaire quelque part ici près de la piste cyclable.
	2	~ 2 years ago	commented	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	#OsmBE #SurveyNeeded
	3	~ 4 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Ajouté il y a quelques moi : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13643734759/history
5278099 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Service road is disconnected from the main road (or if it's desired the way should be a pedestrian) , + gate is a little offset , sidewalk is drawed on the edge of the road.
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Fixed, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31614456
5275048 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	There is a tunnel inside a tunnel here (rail) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119628923 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975709366 The tunnel is signed on the pin and on the exit at Vivier d'Oie and it's not Tunnel du Vivier d'Oie ... (spoted this week on L26 train) Tunnel Bois de la Cambre - Tunnel Terkamerenbos (not sure if it's signed in 1 word or 2 word in nl Ter Kammerenbos) So v1 of wikidata wast mostly correct until same user decide to change it ... Unfurtunaly i haven't found picture of this signage, and you need to be lucky to catch all 2 signs as it's in fr in one side and in nl in other side (in each entrance) or doing AR beetween the 2 stations and making a video. There is probably some cab view of l26 on internet to catch it.
	2	~ 4 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I removed way 1119628923, it looks like I didn’t see there was already something. This document below comes from Infrabel and says "Bois de la Cambre" for the FR name. https://infrabel.be/sites/default/files/generated/files/paragraph/9700-2025-01-01.pdf
	3	~ 2 months ago	commented	JhowieNitnek ♦538	Best Address is calling the tunnel fr: Tunnel SNCB Bois de la Cambre nl: Tunnel NMBS Terkamerenbos https://databrussels.be/nl/id/streetname/5828
	4	~ 2 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Well, that makes two reputable sources that confirm this name. The Wikidata entry still names it differently per language: "Tunnel du Vivier d'Oie - Tunnel van Boondaal". Let's change this and use the name here above. @JhowieNitnek: Can you please help us and change the Wikidata entry to make the existing name an "alt_name" and use the BestAddress name as the primary name, and possibly also rename the Wikipedia article?
	5	~ 2 months ago	commented	JhowieNitnek ♦538	I can certainly do that!
	6	~ 2 months ago	commented	JhowieNitnek ♦538	I did it! Also chreated a commons category Category:Tunnel du Bois de la Cambre/Terkamerenbostunnel
	7	~ 2 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	OK, done. For the FR version, I put the "Tunnel Bois de la Cambre" version (without "de") as an alt_name, but that can also be switched if necessary. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975709366
5274870 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30178958 Landuse=residential Any reason to justify the layer=-1 on the landuse , history don't give a explanation (appart the yoyo edit)
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	The only logical explanation is because there are small landuse=grass areas inside this large one, and the user (incorrectly) assumed layer=-1 was necessary to render both of them. Let’s remove it once and for all. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30178958 Thanks for the report.
5273150 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Construction of platform is finished, elevator in function, all accessible but no train stoping yet. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1486152059669036 For the 2 tracks under "construction" that raise validation issue : in fact there is only the "pile" of the bridge for the future platform constructed and no sign of construction of track : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1627126181875863 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1536245731176712 so footway crossing track are not bridge , they make a "remblai" to pout them on it. I think it's linked on the multiple appeal on the councyl of the state. Existing track in use are re numbered 5 and 6 (see track ref for position) + add zone:Brupass=1 on the station.
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Thanks for the pictures, the situation had been updated.
4041941	1	~ 2 years ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233514964 is realy suspicious. On previous research i made the culvert going to a collector in Berboets https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4014153 but Vivaqua should disconect it and make a new culvert but not found a lot info about it. (more research needed for this part). No official data available for the nord part , so maybe it's simply still go to the collector in Bervoet or theres is a new culvert going to the nord but in any case the relief here don't allow the stream going up to the east ... (i suspect user draw v1 in order to connect on patinage on guessing completly how ...)
	2	~ 2 years ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.egeb-sgwb.be/IMG/pdf/brusseau_rs1_final.pdf P94 confirm : - Last point where the stream go to collector - That the project is to connect the Geleytsbeek https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12719935 So in any case going tdown Saint Denis not Patinage. Removing suspicious part. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151209499
	3	~ 4 months ago	reopened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483
	4	~ 4 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	I reopen this note because : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181657607 ==> . Le Leybeek disparait entre le 49 et le 51 rue Bervoets et pas entre le 53 et le 59 https://www.egeb-sgwb.be/IMG/pdf/brusseau_rs1_final.pdf P94 mention the name of the company : Il s’agit de la société la société Willens & Lucy (située au n°49 rue M. Bervoets). So look's like there is small on air just after the railway and going on V shape of building 51
	5	~ 4 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Gotcha the manhole in the picture of the sewer inspection : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13783949495 https://historical.osm.be/#17/50.81274/4.32012/Vandermaelen18461854FL also confirm the natural flow (for reference, it's offset and the railway doesn't exist at this moment , but the natural flow excactly correspond with - Aerial 2015 - Digitaal Hoogtemodel Vlaanderen II (Vue aérienne, précision 0,25 m) - picture of the document, in // of the changeset description 181657607 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182055476
5271912 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Platforms refurbished /extended + crossings in Silence and Molensteen modified too https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=739911328473508
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated, thanks. (Multiple changesets all over this place.)
5270942 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Moneytrans has lost is nbb agrement (as financial service) the 10/06/2025 and is under opening bankrupt 26 juin 2025 so it's higly probable that the gold buyer use the place (no recent mapillary found)
	2	~ 4 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I had put this strange changeset to my survey list, because the Moneytrans website did not mention anything about this agency. I will not be far from this place tonight, will try to have a look.
	3	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Surveyed tonight. Caraor has replaced Moneytrans, exactly as you predicted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7942829794 StreetComplete hides notes where I am the last participant. I couldn’t upload the picture through SC but here it is https://api.panoramax.xyz/#focus=pic&pic=a0596aa6-72d5-48eb-a686-f8e62f61a4aa
5270911 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Wolvendael and Carsoel : 04 Mai 2026 : maxspeed=30 km/h (CC Décember 2025)
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated maxspeed and source:maxspeed, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182215925
5269698 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Changeset 181193093 deleted Chemin Isabelle Stengers but the road still exist and connect the actual impossible oneway near the CH building https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4462524203982321 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1307816984849982
	2	~ 4 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	(but no more the dual carriage way on the entrance)
	3	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Restored all the ways that had been incorrectly erased, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089069636 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010996905 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010996908
5256740 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	V9 of the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31363930 was correct until v10 extend it until the metro station entrance area : https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/31363930 (...) ! In meantime since +-14/04/2026 they have start moved to the new "caserne" on the north (Urbis Admin looks correct for the main builging) , small building on it are not (Mapillary are being uploaded now to double check) Since this Friday 17/04/2026 they have completly moved (fot the operational part) but technicaly there is stll some evacuation of the decontimination flow that go to old casern, so until complete finition , v9 is correct)
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Restored shape, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31363930 (Only fixed the southern side, not sure about the small appendix in the N-W corner.)
	3	~ 4 months ago	reopened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483
	4	~ 4 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	For the small appendix in the N-W i will pass end off this week to double check, it was added by same changeset and follow the cadastral parcel, but a cadastral parcel give you ownership not fuction , if you take the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227645310 there is also a part on the back "594M2" but it's in use by the municipality not the fire station. Let's keep this note open until i will go to doublecheck.
	5	~ 4 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=989151293649244 will become part of the landscape , imho not to include as fire station
	6	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	OK, done. Let’s close.
5268299 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Duplicated associatedStreet relation : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3011689 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20449706
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	OK, I understand the problem. I have an inventory of those relations but some existing relations that lack addr:city or addr:postcode were not harvested, and because of that I generated new relations. I will fix this asap, thanks.
5268295 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Duplicated associatedStreet relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2998225 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20449703
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Removed duplicate, thanks.
5268188 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	L'entrée est un peut plus à l'est dans le renfoncement visible sur les aerials 2022 (bluring oblige) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1228926207541455
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	OK, fait. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9930114874
5268184 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	can't be the 6 here ; 8 is here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10744871960/ https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1177780220817641
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	You are right. Updated the doors here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13767741152 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2476725529
5268118 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Rue de la Vanne 4 is signed here : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1681850352166479
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	You found it, great! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9391824370
5268098 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	28 signed on the letter box : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1725970062134177
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	OK, let's restore this address. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2670659837
5268096 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	53 is also writen on the vitrine : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1671688934006103
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated addresses here, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2476708064
5265110 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Avenue des Arums 1 exist :-) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3061093097482391
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181828515
5264722 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Footway crossing and cycleway refurbished here, litle more to the south https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=628588366732103
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated all the footways and crossings in this area, thanks for the notice. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1504173994
5254338 Category: CoMaps	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	Kauwberg ♦4	"ce ,'est pas une réserve naturelle c'est une réserve semie-naturelle car elle a déjà été chamboulée par l'homme. c'était u, mél ,ge de prairies de fauche, paturage, carrière etc. semie-nagurelle est plus exacte. " OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-04T05:22:58Z POI name: Kauwberg POI types: landuse-forest leisure-nature_reserve #CoMaps ios 2026.03.23-6-ios
	2	~ 4 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=nature%20reserve?uselang=en a été ajouté car il s'agit d'un site classé Natura 2000. Et en recherchant suite à votre note je vois qu'il a aussi un statut boundary= protected area (non mappé dans OSM) https://app.bruxellesenvironnement.be/multimedia/PDG_Kauwberg_II9_FR.pdf (page 42) Je comprend la nuance que vous voulez apporter de part la naissance/utilisation du site et de son plan de gestion, mais je ne trouves pas de tag documenté pour apporter la nuance (bien que dans OSM on tag aussi des zones de tel sorte même quand il n'y a pas de statuts de protection, dans ces cas ça peut porter sujet à discussion, mais ici je vois mal les raisons de retirer le tag) Comment voyez-vous la chose ?
	3	~ 4 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	En fait exactement la même note a été faite il y a 6 mois sans réponse non plus, closing. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4922103
5261924 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	From here going south : tram track is missaligned until https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3269540179
	2	~ 4 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	until here in fact (previous node the track is going to be aligned but the offset continue after too until : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3269540161
	3	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Fixed, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181717681
5194355 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	only bicycle can pass here now : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=950367814223413 Problem : Chaussée deBoitsfort is suposed to be oneway Last Mapillary 2025 don't show if it's all 2 way or just a part #surveyneeded (Avenue des Coccinelles)
	2	~ 6 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Very intriguing indeed. It looks like an M2 sign here below the arrow, as if cyclists were allowed to ride contraflow on half of the part. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1921972068627879 For anyone making a survey: if the two access roads are still barred like here (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1829466440969417), we should check how cars are supposed to enter Chaussée de Boitsfort/Bosvoordsesteenweg. Perhaps along the tram tracks but from what I see in the same Mapillary sequence, it was not allowed…
	3	~ 6 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	no more survey needeed i got it : the oneway on the section until Staphylins is removed : https://www.mapillary.com/app/time-travel?lat=50.79598229999999&lng=4.403770200000054&z=19.462066180342262&focus=photo&x=0.5591967046095118&y=0.5514654978295329&zoom=1.7730192719486084&panos=true&pKey=2624433944605690&cKey=1086672300004415 other part is still oneway: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1875002299839807 and Avenue des Staphylins is oneway with oneway:bicycle=no : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=921680793597890 the crossing on the pin has also moved more to the east (visible on Digitaal Vlaanderen preliminary aerial imagery)
	4	~ 5 months ago	commented	pistepilvi ♦49	I added the bollard to the map. Last week, when approaching Chaussée de Boitsfort from Avenue des Staphylins, I noticed a D1 traffic sign indicating one has to turn right, which makes it impossible to use the parking spaces on the stretch of Chaussée de Boitsfort between Staphylins and de La Hulpe. I am not sure if this is the intended final situation for this stretch of road, and I am also not sure if it is intended to be unidirectional for bicycles.
	5	~ 4 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	The D1 is still there theses sunday : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=26395822600044764 Looks like a typical Brussels situation : works on a regional road, change on nearest street signs but no change on the municipality side. Maybe we can consider that there is no C1 sign and make the part near 154A bidirectional ? It's borderline i agree but i don't see another solution.
	6	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Yes, this is the most reasonable solution. Fixed, thanks for the surveys. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147759773
5259174 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Crossing has been redone : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1578832303348986
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	OK, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181632388 This pedestrian crossing where the markings are different for both parts (because one direction has motor traffic and the other one has only trams) is really interesting.
5259164 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	TP Tram has been redone (little more to south east) + shelter relocated https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1336801668207514 + asl in front of a tram (for the anectode the cycle trafic light is not synchronised with the trafic light of the tram, so you have sometimes the red and on the same time the public trafic light "ordering" you to go straight (as cyclist/taxi you must follow theses instruction if you are on the line / zone) that the case here.)
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13747918124 + moved the tram platform a little
5258975 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304264157 with bicycle = yes in a non sence (south going part) , restore pedestrian with bicycle=yes on the place itself + there is missing bicycle connector from Rue de Laeken and to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8512006 https://osmcha.org/changesets/177267856
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Thanks! I thought I had caught the main mistakes from this user but there are always new skeletons in the cupboard… 🙄 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181615708
5256279 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479608396 Explanation about the noname=yes on v1 It's not the official name, it was a long time demand of locals and activisits but the Municipal Councyl finaly refused. https://bx1.be/communes/bruxelles-ville/bruxelles-place-patrice-lumumba-sera-inauguree-30-juin-a-lentree-quartier-matonge/ So the Square go in Brussels not Ixelles finaly. The steet signs showed in the reportage or here https://zintv.org/agenda/decolonisez-ixelles-re-inauguration-de-la-place-lumumba/ was removed BUT in meantime a new street signs has been replaced by someone (and you need to carefuly show it to remarq it's a fake one) (last check in situ 04//04/2026) So it's signed but not official.
	2	~ 4 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Maybe https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/official=no ? or another idea ?
	3	~ 4 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	So, the street sign against the church wall is a fake one, right? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1471804621066638 If that is the case, noname=yes would make the most sense, in particular if there had been an active discussion at the council and a rejection of the name. Keeping the name as proposed:name. (Also a fake street sign here but this one was mapped because there is less political dynamite: https://api.panoramax.xyz/#focus=pic&pic=b2ad0a9c-88ca-4293-aaae-26071fee1b57)
	4	~ 4 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Yes this street sign on Mapillary , i think i have uploaded a more closer one but i have probably cut the sequence too fast when derushing. will try do do a new closer picture for the record. Thanks for the change, make sence.
5255129 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Déjà qu'on a détruit la Maison du Peuple à cet endroit, si en plus on vandalise son nom sous couvert d'un dump massif des donnés pour wikidata sans aucune vérification ni sens critique ... https://academieroyale.be/Academie/documents/VANDERVELDEEmileARB_196858416.pdf
	2	~ 4 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	You’re talking about Émile vs Emile, right? This change intrigued me too, but the street sign apparently uses the unaccented version. Considering that this other square uses the É + all other sources confirm this, I think we should restore the main name=Émile and official_name=Emile https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32252407 (And slightly adjust the rule about how street signs are the ultimate authority for spelling: we correct the spelling when the error is obvious, as we do for "Rue de l'Elan" or "Rue de l'Ecole".)
	3	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241550320
	4	~ 4 months ago	reopened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483
	5	~ 4 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Thanks for the fix. For the record it's already clearly indicated in street name convention : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Street_names
5254339 Category: CoMaps	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	Kauwberg ♦4	"ce chemin n'existe plus. c'est une zone sauvage" The place has gone or never existed. A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-04T05:22:58Z POI has no name POI types: hwtag-nobicycle hwtag-private highway-path #CoMaps ios 2026.03.23-6-ios
	2	~ 4 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	A l'endroit du pin il n'y a plus rien dans openstreetmap ; vous l'avez enlevé le 17/08/2025 https://osmcha.org/changesets/170580425 Mais votre snapshot data date du 04/08/2025 dans Comaps , raison pour laquel vous continuez à le visualiser. Par contre : ce chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/765158143 perdu sans aucune connexion me semble douteux, quel est son état actuel ?
	3	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Chemin non connecté retiré de la carte. Pas de réponse de Kauwberg après 17 jours → fermons la note.
5253734 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Building height by adding building levels tag : I would made this edit using Ground Level imagery (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) , supported by counting the level on non proprietary imagery : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3606914066269183 I count 3 levels don't think that windows that are in -0.5 are counted as level, or i am wrong ? + add level underground : 1 (survey visiting the museum 2025)
	2	~ 4 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	The user fixed the number of levels (everyone agrees on 3) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181594219 I also added building:levels:underground=1 We can close this note now. Thanks for raising the issue.
5253561 Category: Unknown	1	~ 4 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	This part is indicated as bicycle=use_sidepath , but the https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12887374 (Itinéraire cycliste communal ) use it. Also it's strange to have a oneway cycleway connector https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842377350 used to go from the residential cyclestreet to the primary as it's not possible or it's not oneway, or the signage say something else , or fixmystreet ... :-)
	2	~ 4 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	There are probably several problems here. (And I remember having added those cycle routes a few years ago after a couple of surveys, a lot of guessing and not the convenience of the 360° photo coverage we are having now.) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1389393742509793 → the ICC sign sends cyclists to the left, and I suppose it means crossing the boulevard to use https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144270575. That solves the problem if small Lambermont alley which is one-way + the one-way cycle connector which the relation currently uses in both directions. After that, the cycle relation can use this connector https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1131443679 and take the cycle lane on the boulevard, and it should work.
	3	~ 4 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	typo: That solves the problem of the small Lambermont alley…
	4	~ 4 months ago	commented	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	the previous cycleway (behind the parking zone) can be considered as a contraflox cycleway > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2781423512156955&lat=50.87043609997198&lng=4.383224099972267&z=19.9&focus=photo&x=0.978140093804775&y=0.5335589405882277&zoom=1.3754747311370465&panos=true
	5	~ 4 months ago	closed	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	*(informal) contraflow cycleway mapped the relation like this > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12887374#map=18/50.869802/4.384296&layers=C if there's still an issue, reopen the note
5208229 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	---	There is a powerbank rental point near the toilets. Could be nice to have on the map, but I could not find a category for it in the editor
	2	~ 5 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	A lot of things would be nice to add, but that can only be useful if someone builds a tool to render them on the map or to make it possible to query it, if people are looking for it. There has been a tagging proposal for those devices but it looks like no-one agreed or is interested. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Power_Bank_Rental
	3	~ 5 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	As they pop up everywhere since last year i suppose it's like this one : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12995589381 another scheme (but not use in BE yet) is : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13092040276 @anonymous : can you confirm the brand and the location creating a new note?
	4	~ 5 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	14 days and no complement from anonymous note, closing.
5243575 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490082850 is not straight : from this crossing : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1708897156944225 you must go to the right to bypass the "Starbucks" building is in Urbis Admin , not sure footprint is correct or not but sure if you go straight you will have a problem :-) + one part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/558262589 is a bridge https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1260110832356243 (outline visible in Urbis ortho 2015) + should not connect the roof.
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	OK, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490082850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/558262589
5243458 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Le 'Square" n'est pas ici , mais à l'emplacement du Mémorial : see : https://monument.heritage.brussels/fr/Anderlecht/Square_des_Martyrs_Juifs/10700292 Bordé d’une haie dans les années 1980 ou 1990 et entouré d’arbres, le square est constitué d’une pelouse au centre de laquelle prend place le mémorial, de plan hexagonal, longé par un parterre de même forme.
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552399271
5243221 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Dispatching zonal (DPZ) Zone 5343 https://www.police.be/5343/fr/contact/services/dispatching-zonal-dpz not open to the public
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13720298473
5236764 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	PlayGuide ♦2,958	Il existe ici une aire de jeux signalée via l'appli #PlayGuide : https://playguide.eu/app/playground/70b98e87-7b84-41ac-b957-fed530d0b178
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Added thanks : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181084129
5235367 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	All surrounding crossing have now tactile paving, i can change it but one little question : on traffic_island there is only one "shared" tactile paving https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=856058813418520 on crossing node should be tactile_paving=yes or incorrect ? and witch value on kerbs ; if yes we "duplicate" the data if no it's false. i tend to say duplicate is less problematic. Any advice ?
	2	~ 5 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	What we see in the middle of the boulevard is valid tactile tiles, therefore it will be tactile_paving=yes everywhere (on edges and on crossing nodes). This is at least how we have been mapping so far. (That aside, I am interested to know if Bxl-Mobilité still enforces a reference document with the standard values that should apply for those devices, because the distance between the tile and the road is greater in the middle island than on the sidewalks.)
	3	~ 5 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Thanks for the advice. It make sense to have only one in traffic island, i have learn something : https://data.mobility.brussels///media/publications/observatory/cahiers/pedestrian_2024_fr.pdf Indeed i take some measure in josm and there is a lot of think that doesn't follow the guide.
5233068 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	"Esperluette" in fr and nl : https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?s=fp;s2;p06248eee-ab7c-4d94-8b03-74ccc492cbf4;c299.68/3.61/71;m17/50.848012/4.437558;bs;udefault
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Many thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5233068
	3	~ 5 months ago	reopened	bxl-forever ♦5,963
	4	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Correct link here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3022879
5212097 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	TomL66	This is not a cycleway but an unpaved track
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	Tom Ameye ♦33
	3	~ 5 months ago	reopened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483
	4	~ 5 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	adding bicycle=no on a path that contain a cycle network https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12427 is a little strange. Signs allow bicycle, i think the concern of user is more the highway=* choose than the access ; see : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=278169820686578
	5	~ 5 months ago	commented	Tom Ameye ♦33	You are perfectly right. I reverted my change.
	6	~ 5 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Thanks we can close this note now.
5229849 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	There is a crossing in the former place of bus stop position, platform relocated on north east https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1274630000968943
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13702233549
5228968 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Both direction : same as Petit Sablon : Cycleway beetween sidewalk and platforms : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4477939085786558 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2119058328892788
	2	~ 5 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	OK, I will try to map this in the next days. Thanks for the pictures.
	3	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1496177356 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1496296255
5227491 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Operator should be bilingual we are in Brussels here + fix/add more appropriate contact website (this was from the construction time)
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Fixed, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/615327445
5227451 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Flibco bus stop is on another side and it's probably never be there (it was the place of a former taxi station) They use this one : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4756215722 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1046228450574673 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1046228450574673 + i have a doubt they can or can't use the Bus lane on Deux Gares (normaly reserved for public bus and school bus) but i don't know their status maybe as they are regular on sence of the 1975 legislation. ?
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Fixed, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180676361
5226168 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	The shelter position looks like a old situation, it' on the back now (beetween tree) + waste basket position probably too can be partially show on URBIS 2021 aerial imagery (north-south) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=486848310692329
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	It looks like the tram platforms had moved a bit too. Thanks for the pictures, I redrew several items here.
5220169 Category: StreetComplete	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	Helge Kreutzmannn ♦1,485	Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – Le Lys d'Or Bed & Breakfast (Guest House) – https://osm.org/node/12567658273 via StreetComplete 63.0: Looks Luke plants are now there
	2	~ 5 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I cannot find online information about it, so I’d like to double check with you first, before changing the map. Is "Luke plants" a plant/flower shop? Or is it also a B&B? We have a mapillary image taken in January but nothing was visible. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1178212000964725
	3	~ 5 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	signs still there : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2169897973548132 and on the ring : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=917395714528716 tested the reservation and even it's full bucked possible to do a reservation for 4 days in Jully 2026. Closing.
5221756 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Urbis is wrong here, the building footprint doesn't make a small "extension" to the sidewalk, its in the levels (and they just made it for one of the 4) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4215414668724032
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Yes, another discrepancy. Fixed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068026819
5221568 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Ancien garage et bureau des Brasseries Impérial https://monument.heritage.brussels/fr/buildings/37050 not heritage 4 , the Brewery was on Rue Bissé : https://monument.heritage.brussels/fr/buildings/34920
	2	~ 3 months ago	closed	Eebie ♦1,067	Heritage is changed to heritage=inv (inventory); heritage:website as source is added
5216557 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	works are finished, new tram platform layout ; same design as the south part (motor vehicle share tram track) + shared footway/bicycle : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=931247356167619
	2	~ 5 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I made some measurements too. Will map it in the next days. Thanks for the pictures.
	3	~ 5 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	360 between 2 "draches" are here : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1911662252809456
	4	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated, thanks.
5216013 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	Yves LL ♦22	ce petit tronçon (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582343668) est indiqué bicycle=no. hors un vélo peut passer du rond point à la locale de l'avenue de Tervueren. Vu la configuration du rond-point ( https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.8371334&lng=4.4082596&z=18.575360348671403&dateFrom=2026-01-01&focus=photo&pKey=1423477719266907&x=0.00919928020397176&y=0.5898482223223251&zoom=0) ne serait-il pas plus judicieux d'attacher https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146284136 directement sur le rond-point? (sinon, enlever le bicycle=no)
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	bien vu , et en fait meme la partie après n'est absolument pas interdite aux vélos updaté merci. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180301534
5214739 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	There is a "crossover" road here , not sure what street name to use https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=974795707215109
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1491454981 Naming small connectors has always been a problem, this is especially hard for 4-legs intersections because if we choose the name of one of the roads it might give silly results in instructions when people go straight ahead or make a turn. noname is probably safer.
5213562 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	bridge is open again : https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?background=streets&focus=pic&map=18.15/50.850621/4.338029&pic=84895968-4196-4cee-b27d-71f0c2f4e1bf&seq=431e93e8-2b25-4d4e-a970-fc1e90434125&speed=250&theme=default&users=default&xyz=317.02/-14.74/25
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180213134
5211718 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Pastorale + surrounding : sorry to contradict but the surface here is not sett but paving stones (Interlocking paving stones made of concrete) see : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones It's more for precision than routing issue as most router use same "cost" for both value https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=462702053182151
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I reviewed all the residential streets in this area, applying surface=paving_stones for those interlaced stones. One exception here with this strange mix of stones on this part → surface=sett because it is probably less comfortable than the other streets https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1005080974673627
5208192 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Cyclist share the traffic lights from/to the bridge : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=823224552491174 (via the "ramp"
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added extra connectors, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489809532
	3	~ 5 months ago	reopened	bxl-forever ♦5,963
	4	~ 5 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Sorry, mapping the road crossing was straightforward but I overlooked the "via the ramp"-part. When I look at Mapillary picts, I wonder if we should keep the "bicycle=dismount" part on the ramp. Some navigation engines exclude those entirely from results and will therefore never use the bridge. It looks like one more legal grey zone but perhaps bicycle=yes between the bridge, this connector https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284478931 and the crossing would make sense. Any thoughts?
	5	~ 5 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Yes that make sense , this press release give the intend (pedestrian an bicycle) : https://www.beliris.be/files/files/Projets/Passerelle-Flandre/Communique-de-presse-Persbericht-04.09.2021.pdf I recall well the inauguration , social media pointed out this discontinuity, now as there is a new cycleway "crossing" with Nieuport we can assume it's just a missing sign
	6	~ 5 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	I see you have used bicycle=permissive , sound also good for me as it reflect the situation. Thanks for you help.
5210537 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	SKA Cultural center (re)open the 02/04/2026. (info received by staff member) contact:website=https://ska1030.be/ contact:faceboor=CentreCulturelSchaerbeek Correct outline is here : https://openpermits.brussels/fr/_15/IPE/1775890 I said re-opening because it's the new place for : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227946612 (that is actually already closed for some weeks) It's NOT the old "Espace Théâtral Scarabaeus" introduced by misleading changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/145765191 (on the moment of this edit it was 3-4 years that Scarabaeus was expropriated by the municipality , see https://scarabaeus.net/index.php/plan-dacces/ ) and they used only the Creuse part while the Haecht part was an old cinema (no more relevant but just to point out it's absolutely not the sames thinks).
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated outline and tags, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227424722 I set a timer for myself to update the tags around Apr 2 (i.e. remove construction tags and remove proposed:* prefixes)
5203119 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138427577 should also have building:levels=8 because it's the level of the parts (without the min level correctly indicated on way 1226185078) see : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part (Tags to use in combination) otherwise it's means there is a 2 levels building parts inside a building with 8 levels (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels section : Buildings with parts that don't start at ground level) I know it's a little conter intuitive but it's how data user cosume this and render a mostly empty buidling inside.
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Well, it’s purely a convention. But since F4map and other 3D renderers go like that, we should follow it indeed. It makes sense in this simple wiki example: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Minlevel.svg but does not work well with piled structures. (And IMHO it would make much more sense to map coherent group of floors as polygons instead of slicing floors.) Sorry about the previous edit, it should be correct now.
5199384 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	---	Dada Studios https://dada.be/ Sound recording/mixing
	2	~ 6 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	already on data : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11930646706
5199140 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	Bancki ♦169	Is https://www.industriecultuur.be/brussel/verlaten-tunnel about this tunnel?
	2	~ 6 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Yes.
	3	~ 6 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Picture + story about Nederleest and former Villa yes. But for the radio part there is a little nuance : the antenna where on the south part of the proprety : https://radiohist.be/wp-content/uploads/Bijlage-4-Lacoste-1.pdf (where the former Albertdreef is here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117715928) (see also here https://historical.osm.be/#17/50.88405/4.37294/NGIBasemap1904) so the former installation of technical installation were probably here : see : https://www.on5ub.be/100-ans-radio-laeken and https://www.calameo.com/read/00408784071ff2268cc38 https://www.calameo.com/read/00408784071ff2268cc38 is more compatible than https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=974645357731755 (only speeking about radio part) the rest seams correct. It's more for OpenHistorical map than OSM closing.
5186916 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	JhowieNitnek ♦538	Tour & Taxis Forest https://www.sugiproject.com/forests/tour-and-taxis-forest
	2	~ 6 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Unless otherwise indicated, the Site is our proprietary property and all source code, databases, functionality, software, website designs, audio, video, text, photographs, and graphics on the Site (collectively, the "Content") and the trademarks, service marks, and logos contained therein (the "Marks") are owned or controlled by us or licensed to us, and are protected by copyright and trademark laws and various other intellectual property rights and unfair competition laws of the United States, foreign jurisdictions, and international conventions. The Content and the Marks are provided on the Site "AS IS" for your information and personal use only. Except as expressly provided in these Terms of Use, no part of the Site and no Content or Marks may be copied, reproduced, aggregated, republished, uploaded, posted, publicly displayed, encoded, translated, transmitted, distributed, sold, licensed, or otherwise exploited for any commercial purpose whatsoever, without our express prior written permission. https://www.sugiproject.com/terms-of-use
	3	~ 6 months ago	reopened	JhowieNitnek ♦538
	4	~ 6 months ago	commented	JhowieNitnek ♦538	Doesn't change the fact there needs to be a forest added here
	5	~ 5 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I added a shape here, which can be refined later. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488064259 natural=wood + leaf_type=mixed was found on this proposal in the wiki, about Miyawaki method of planting. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Urban_Overheating Raphael is right, we may not copy information directly from the website, e.g. if there was a map or other details. Everything was drawn from aerial imagery. The website says the forest has an area of 770 m². Despite my efforts to make it as small as possible the OSM object is larger, with 874 m². Can we close this note?
	6	~ 5 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Let’s close it.
5173129 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	---	This is not a bridge but steps
	2	~ 6 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I see highway=steps here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473646748 Closing anonymous note.
	3	~ 6 months ago	reopened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483
	4	~ 6 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Just notice it's because there is bridge=yes. I reopen the note, because this bridge with steps in middle of a retaining wall connecting nothing , surounded by a customers pedestrian area is a little strange, moreover than aerial show nothing and latest mapillary also show only works. I think a survey should be interesting, will plan this following weeks.
	5	~ 6 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	bridge=yes is correct : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1442838217518097 retaining wall is wrong : it's just a part of the roof where the pedestrian area is There is absolutely no restriction on the pedestrain area , or the steps. It's open space by design (as befeore in fact) The 2 pedestrian are connected. (only one area here) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2155191685315785 Sorry no 360 for the moment (clip connector problem, will resolve soon) The sidewalk you draw yesterday is in fact more north east, actual place is +- the virtual pedestrian way (see old imagery, alignment has not changed) probably a little bit more south west https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1483305624 was in v1 aligned for drawing the sidewalk https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13601923406 (v1) was in correct position see : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=910489871361618
	6	~ 6 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	begin of 360 sequence : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=793575419912254
	7	~ 6 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Thanks for the pictures. I made some changes today, including a single pedestrian area on private ground (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20165032) next to the one along Marnix. I will try to finish tomorrow.
	8	~ 6 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	I think it's ok now for the most important thinks. thanks for your mapping here.
5192602 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	ONVA is open to the public : Guichet d’informations - Bruxelles Horaires d’ouverture (jours ouvrables) Avril à Juin Juillet à Mars Lundi, mardi, mercredi, jeudi et vendredi 8h à 12h 13h à 16h Lundi et mardi : 8h à 12h 13h à 16h Mercredi, jeudi et vendredi 8h à 12h https://www.onva-rjv.fgov.be/fr/contact
	2	~ 6 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979109004
5191511 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	I don't think it's a living street , some signs still missing but on each intersection you have a end of cyclestreet zone. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1723849732356969 + oneway:bicycle=no
	2	~ 6 months ago	closed	kabelhaai ♦2,500	end cyclezone at EACH intersection? Seems missing on the northern most part
5181155 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	guichet « Accueil » Service équivalences secondaires (cfwb) Rue Courtois 4 https://equivalences.cfwb.be/equivalences-secondaires/qui-sommes-nous/contact
	2	~ 6 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13610419900 Not sure about the tags. Does this feel okay like this?
	3	~ 6 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	haven't found better so yes , thanks fort he upadate
5176724 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	ref:STIB_MIVB on station subway nodes in bxl are no more correct they have updated the ref in latest GTFS static for STIB-MIVB This one for exemple is 5 not 27 (that is Veeweyde)
	2	~ 6 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	As far as I can remember, the station code—which is still used internally to determine whether displays inside the station will be put with French first (odd numbers) or Dutch first (even numbers)—is still 27, and still matches this part of stops.txt GTFS. Middle two digits of the platform code: 8271,,"SAINTE-CATHERINE",,50.852347,4.347749,,,0,5 8272,,"SAINTE-CATHERINE",,50.851900,4.348012,,,0,5 And first 3 digits of each exit: 0270105,,"1 - Quai au Bois à Brûler",,50.851934,4.348232,,,2,5 0270305,,"1 - Quai aux Briques",,50.851853,4.347863,,,2,5 0270405,,"1 - Quai aux Briques",,50.852581,4.347365,,,2,5 0270505,,"1 - Quai aux Briques",,50.853165,4.346953,,,2,5 0270605,,"1 - Quai au Bois à Brûler",,50.852949,4.347536,,,2,5 You have a valid point that GTFS data also contains additional entries for station themselves. 5,,"SAINTE-CATHERINE",,50.851900,4.348012,,,1, It follows another sequence, where stations were inserted into the GTFS from west to east starting from Gare de l'Ouest/Weststation. Honestly, I don’t know what to do with that situation, because both numbers are correct…
	3	~ 6 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I am not aware of any app using ref:STIB_MIVB for stations. Are you?
	4	~ 6 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	I am a novice to that tbh. I was exploring the use of ref:STIB_MIVB to "group" the new (beta) real time api of waiting time on both platform to link it on the main station for a personal iot application. (but i can use another way to do that so it's not a blocking problem) If you look on https://gtfs.org/fr/documentation/schedule/schedule-best-practices/# it's say that "Le champ parent_station doit faire référence au stop_id de la gare dans laquelle se trouve l’établissement d’embarquement." and for this station it's 5. all platform here or entrance are linked to 5 not to 27 If you take https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6414192032 it's ref:STIB_MIVB 67 and that's match the gtfs data If i follow the logic you explain https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684571186 should be linked to station 70 (diamant)
	5	~ 6 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	La station ou le terminal doit être défini comme une entrée dans stops.txt avec location_type = 1. stop_id,stop_code,stop_name,stop_desc,stop_lat,stop_lon,zone_id,stop_url,location_type,parent_station 67,,"ALBERT",,50.821096,4.343806,,,1, 5,,"SAINTE-CATHERINE",,50.851900,4.348012,,,1,
	6	~ 6 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	If we want to honour the definition of GTFS, then we must use ref:STIB_MIVB=5 for this station, but then we’ll lose existing information, which I think is the correct one. (IMHO, the mistake comes from STIB/MIVB’s export which spawns new id numbers for stations when generating those files instead of using the established ones.) Please leave me a few days to consult two fellow mappers who work with GTFS, and we’ll see how we fix this issue.
	7	~ 6 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179027160 and thanks for the detailed explanation of sub code system , learn something interesting.
5179630 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Is this entrance realy 6A ? look on bestAddress is 6 ; look on mapillary i don't see any A : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1244280290262312 or https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1408735536236744 And BCE give me 6 https://kbopub.economie.fgov.be/kbopub/toonondernemingps.html?ondernemingsnummer=838774539
	2	~ 6 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Nbr 6 is posted on the door. https://api.panoramax.xyz/#focus=pic&pic=fa728f61-01b1-434d-b894-6c14a7f5354a Just fixed now.
5177937 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	According to inspire best addresses it's Place Sainte-Gudule Sinter-Goedeleplein 14 here not Rue de la Chancellerie - Kanselarijstraat + as indicated in bce for some companies here (i.e.) https://kbopub.economie.fgov.be/kbopub/toonvestigingps.html?ondernemingsnummer=544277787
	2	~ 6 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Fixed, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9036299313
5174120 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Postal code 1010 Cité administrative de l'État - Rijksadministratief Centrum is no more in use since 30/09/2016 see https://www.socialsecurity.be/portail/glossaires/dmfa.nsf/ConsultFrImprPDF/93334AEC94585C74C1258CFB002D4547/$FILE/VersComplDMFA254_F.pdf (page 398) Also not pass the validation tools of the universal postal service provider
	2	~ 6 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	You are right, there is a discrepancy. I did a recent change because Pachéco 19 had this unusual postcode in the 01/2026 version of UrbIS… and in the 02/2026 version everything is now correctly set with postcode=1000.
	3	~ 6 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Fixed, many thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178814826
5158274 Category: Unknown	1	~ 7 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	new tram track under construction : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=911621537910924 https://www.stib-mivb.be/voyager/chantiers-et-projets/chantiers-en-cours/nouvelle-sortie-de-trams-via-la-chaussee-de-haecht-a-haren
	2	~ 7 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Oh yes, that’s true, thanks for the pictures. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475051008
5148166 Category: StreetComplete	1	~ 7 months ago	opened	Valerio_Bozzolan ♦1,108	In context of overlay "Things" – OPERA-ULB (Surveillance) – https://osm.org/node/8882651229 via StreetComplete 62.2: I cannot locate this surveillance camera. Just the one at the corner is there. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/325705.jpg
	2	~ 7 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	It’s not really a camera but more a surveillance:type=sensor. AFAIK, this is a research project aimed at counting the number of phones here, as a proxy to the number of people using this street. Maybe the project is finished and they removed all equipment.
	3	~ 7 months ago	commented	queerthoughts ♦2,761	That looks like a regular dome camera to me? If it records images or video, it's not a sensor but a camera.
	4	~ 7 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	@queerthoughts: We are not talking about the same thing. The camera on the picture is a regular dome camera, it is already mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7295757373 The StreetComplete quest is about another device.
	5	~ 7 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	The url of the project is in 404 but according to the date of the node creation i believe it's linked to this : https://www.rtbf.be/article/reouverture-des-commerces-un-site-web-pour-connaitre-en-temps-reel-l-affluence-a-la-rue-neuve-a-bruxelles-10646982 and from the same team a headmap visualisation (with osm map) : https://opera-wcg.polytech.ulb.be/en/projects/crowd-monitoring Real data time was here : https://www.rueneuvebruxelles.be/ and is also in 404 for the data. Unless somebody want to contact ulb the sensor (wifi) is probably gone (innoviris scale up found is generaly short term funding (up to max 4 years) and since there is some improvement to have anonymised data for 4g/5g operator. (was in there planning when they begin the research : https://archive.ph/XyOiP ) it's probably useless.
	6	~ 7 months ago	commented	kabelhaai ♦2,500	Correct location? This building was a construction site in 2021. This node was added during that time. Have a hard time finding it. It's gotta be something other than that camera. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8882651229
	7	~ 7 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I wrote last week to someone in the research team, to enquire about this project, and it turns out the test has been discontinued. There were 14 sensors; I inspected those locations during the week and could not spot any of them. (It’s hard to see because there are multiple boxes on the walls but nothing that looks like those sensors.) Closing note.
5155430 Category: Unknown	1	~ 7 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	I see no bicycle restriction here. If the Park is managed by bruxelles environnement general rules apply : bicycle access is granded until signposted sign forbit it. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1944199279694155
	2	~ 7 months ago	closed	JuanjoMC ♦82	bicycle=yes restored on all pedestrians ways within Parc de Laeken https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178150685 I had accidentally deleted the tag while cleaning other access tags (horse, foot, vehicle, ...) on changeset 177777496, sorry
5155429 Category: Unknown	1	~ 7 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	I see no bicycle restriction here. If the Park is managed by bruxelles environnement general rules apply : bicycle access is granded until signposted sign forbit it. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1126446686142706
	2	~ 7 months ago	closed	JuanjoMC ♦82	bicycle=yes restored on all pedestrians ways within Parc de Laeken https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178150685
5155412 Category: Unknown	1	~ 7 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Bicycle route https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1102531 pass here but pedestrian way are now marked without bicycle=yes Not passed by there today to check if there is some change here but it's mostly improbable. (pin + Avenue des trembles northbound + connection to Centenaire. West part of tagette is more borderline as there is a C3 without exception comming from Gros Tilleul, but no indication going to Gros Tilleul.
	2	~ 7 months ago	closed	JuanjoMC ♦82	bicycle=yes restored on all pedestrians ways within Parc de Laeken https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178150685
5078566 Category: Unknown	1	~ 9 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	New separate cycleway (oneway=no) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=781527164798188
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456029773 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456029772
	3	~ 9 months ago	reopened	Thierry1030 ♦6,264
	4	~ 9 months ago	commented	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	@Raph: surface=concrete or asphalt? I tend to say it's concrete ...
	5	~ 9 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	it's look like concrete to me also, i pass there frequently, i will double check next week.
	6	~ 9 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I passed here… and it is concrete. :-)
	7	~ 8 months ago	reopened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483
	8	~ 8 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	It's look like concrete It's the colour of conctete But in fact it's colored asphalt. I passed last week and i notice a strange "granulat" in the junction with the paving stones near the street. So yesterday, i saw the new part in construction (black aphalt in same level of the street) and i ask a contractor worker and they will just add a spayed paint to it (grey) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176075767
5090871 Category: Unknown	1	~ 8 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	no more construction here but new buildings ready(Urbis Admin look up to date) , + looks like there is a connection to the Foyer Anderlecthois buiddings (near the noexit node) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1201952855194483
	2	~ 8 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I started mapping this area. The new buildings and the small path are mapped now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175939590 + https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458607125 Some more work to do to remove the construction site and add the new buildings on the other side of the street. Probably later today.
	3	~ 8 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Done. Thanks for the note.
5078590 Category: Unknown	1	~ 9 months ago	opened	bxl-forever ♦5,963	I spotted a strange situation here last week, but do not recall all the details. When coming from the north, entering the cycle track requires doing a complicated move. Presumably using the zebra crossing and the footway… but the current permissions on OSM do not match this. + Need to check the connections with the two small streets on the west side. I will survey again later (within 2 weeks), unless someone is faster.
	2	~ 9 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Zebra crossing effectively : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175532703 I passed yesterday here and now i realise it's signed when you come frome south : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1916907445851178 For the 2 smalls streat on west : Near Barchon there is a connection but not clear if they will move the footway crossing or it's in purpose : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3674092632722213 On St André there is a kerb : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2119305502214208
	3	~ 8 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	OK, thanks for the survey and the latest changes. We can keep it as it is until the situation evolves.
5078462 Category: Unknown	1	~ 9 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Building construction if finished and in use (partially) UrbisAdmin looks ok for footprint.
	2	~ 9 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Updated, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260474644
5021213 Category: StreetComplete	1	~ 10 months ago	opened	Mastodommte ♦34	Unable to answer "What bicycle equipment is available here?" – private (Bicycle Repair Tool Stand) – https://osm.org/node/7734014455 via StreetComplete 61.3: Privé
	2	~ 10 months ago	commented	Jakka ♦34,655	comment privé, personne ne peut utiliser ?
	3	~ 10 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	This user created a whole bunch of strange notes and never answered a single follow-up question nor reply to comments on their dubious changesets. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mastodommte/notes Let’s close this note.
	4	~ 10 months ago	reopened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483
	5	~ 10 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	It's not private it's just a compressed air point already set on the fuel station. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1383840443360356 Some users set this as bicycle repair station but i think : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcompressed_air if we need to map it seperatly , or set on the fuel station (as it's only schrader valve , all fuel with compressed_air=yes do the job ). no strong opinion on that. @Mastodommte : please provide more info next time, be sure you explore all the area, and reply to your own notes.
	6	~ 10 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Thanks Raphael, I removed the object.
5021218 Category: StreetComplete	1	~ 10 months ago	opened	Mastodommte ♦34	Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – Vacant Shop – https://osm.org/node/1417966493 via StreetComplete 61.3: Immeuble
	2	~ 10 months ago	commented	Sim100v ♦45	He didn't find the proper etiquette
	3	~ 10 months ago	closed	Jakka ♦34,655	Immeuble=building ?
	4	~ 10 months ago	reopened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483
	5	~ 10 months ago	closed	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	@Mastodommte @Sim100v I passed there this morning and the correct answer is that it's still vacant. There is still the signs of moving and clearly a new business can go there. So please : take time to read a little bit the wiki and the streetcomplete documentation before doing such notes. you have also the community forum and a lot of online ressources. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant
4992570 Category: Unknown	1	~ 11 months ago	opened	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	residential road (ventweg/rue latérale) + small part cycleway between Av. des Jacinthes et Av. des Glycines > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1159613999412733
	2	~ 11 months ago	commented	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Added here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436065033 Is there a link to a public document showing the project? This would help to know how the junction with the main road happens and how it goes with the cycle track west of this point.
	3	~ 10 months ago	commented	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	https://www.beliris.be/projets/boulevardlambermont.html
	4	~ 10 months ago	closed	Bwest890
	5	~ 10 months ago	reopened	Thierry1030 ♦6,264
	6	~ 10 months ago	commented	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	@Bwest890: why did you close the note without changing anything?
	7	~ 9 months ago	closed	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	I passed by today. Between Av des Jacinthes and Av. des Glycines the cycleway and living_street are ready > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175321377 I will follow it up. Note can be closed
5029277 Category: Unknown	1	~ 10 months ago	opened	RaphaelPasloin ♦1,483	Both Sénat and La chambre are open to the public ! opening hours set to off is not correct. (access during commission and plénnière)
	2	~ 10 months ago	commented	Thierry1030 ♦6,264	opening_hours="by appointment"
	3	~ 10 months ago	closed	bxl-forever ♦5,963	Fixed, thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6783233231 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6783233230