OpenStreetMap Note Activities of phodgkin for the last 12 Months
Overall Activities | 12 Months
Opened: 65 (38%) Commented: 20 (12%) Closed: 85 (50%) Reopened: 0 (0%)
Stats per month
Latest | Limit 250
Latest | Limit 250 | The colored events are made by phodgkin
Note#⏱️ Last updatedEventContributorComment
4978676
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopened---Durham Unit
2~ 10 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
This needs more information!
3~ 14 hours agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Closing as insufficient information provided
19873071~ 6 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Should be tarmac path running along this boundary
2~ 1 day agocommentedconfusedbuffalo
♦18,101
Path has been added, safe to mark it as tarmac? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925509602
3~ 1 day agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
Not sure now where the surface comment came from. It was purely based on imagery (and Strava heatmap), so probably meant "looks like tarmac path here". I think its safer to used "paved".
4~ 1 day agoclosedconfusedbuffalo
♦18,101
Updated then, thanks
19498071~ 6 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Burton Beck presumably continues - not shown on OpenData StreetView
2~ 6 days agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Culvert since mapped
25725121~ 5 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Significant slippage in this area. Not clear that official PRoW route (beside river) is passable (Mar 2021).
2~ 6 days agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Closing - mapped paths consistent with Strava heatmap.
5245960
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Labelling building wings with `office=research` is surely tagging for the renderer?
2~ 3 months agocommentedntzm
♦506
I agree, how do you think uni faculties should be tagged?
3~ 3 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
I don't think there's a well defined tagging scheme. But Sheffield does seem to have an epidemic of blue dots, with `office=research` being (ab)used to make labels. I really don't think you can start labelling bits of buildings like this.
4~ 3 months agocommentedntzm
♦506
You'll find they were mostly added by one user who always tagged for the renderer. I would be happy to remove these but it does feel like it is kind of useful information. I think tagging "wings" can be deleted, but actual departments and their floors feels like useful information, not necessarily tagged in their current scheme though.
5~ 3 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
I think the building parts labels should be converted to building:part + name. It won't get rendered, but will keep the info. The stuff in () usually belongs in other tags e.g. anonyms, building levels (-> level).
6~ 3 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
"acronyms"!
7~ 9 days agocommentedntzm
♦506
I've split these into wings, and added faculty tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:faculty What do you think of these changes?
8~ 9 days agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Looks very sensible to me!
42587691~ 2 years agoopenedDorneyLake123
♦6,074
landuse=leisure ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238306011
2~ 12 days agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
Removed the `landuse=leisure`, but it's still muddled between `amenity=events_centre`, kindergarten and community centre...
39535971~ 2 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Cars along here. Is this a sidewalk/footway?
2~ 12 days agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Yes, fixed
5425142
Category: Unknown
1~ 14 days agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Facility has closed or changed function? https://www.cqc.org.uk/location/RX3AD
5421557
Category: Unknown
1~ 16 days agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Footpath is heavily overgrown here. DCC mapping implies that PRoW descends *within* tree line.
2~ 16 days agoclosedLordGarySugar
♦2,175
I have added the definitive line so that we know it's impassable https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1545267894
36994541~ 3 years agoopenedtomhukins
♦313
There are two separate features named "Shibden Park" here, which means that the name appears twice on the map. They probably need combining: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910161905/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36913964/history There's also a separate node named "Shibden Estate" here which should perhaps be an alt_name tag on Shibden Park but I have no local knowledge and could be wrong. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/361229184
2~ 2 years agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
Removed the "Shibden Estate" node - superseded by more detailed mapping. The two Shibden Parks do need either combining or separating into a distinct "park" component and a "nature reserve" component. Requires good local info!
3~ 18 days agocommentedYorkshire Mapper
♦39
I believe the intention here is for the nature reserve to describe the whole area and the park to be more like land use. But the park area isn't particularly accurate
4~ 16 days agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
The nature reserve is boundary is OK, but could be fitted better to cadastral parcels / local nature reserve mapping. The correct title is "Shibden Park and Cunnery Wood Local Nature Reserve", but at some point these have been split, creating the current confusion. Rejoining these as a single multipolygon (with designation=local_nature_reserve) would be an improvement.
5405681
Category: Unknown
1~ 24 days agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Strava heatmap suggests FP has been re-routed outside fence
5405494
Category: Unknown
1~ 24 days agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Shap Beck doesn't look like a river at this point!
2~ 23 days agoclosedLordGarySugar
♦2,175
I've retagged to stream and reversed the direction
5403659
Category: Unknown
1~ 25 days agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Routing of footpath doesn't look right
5403658
Category: Unknown
1~ 25 days agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Determine route of FP 307021
21771471~ 6 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Strava trace continues S
2~ 2 years agoclosedpaceban351All paid!
3~ 2 years agoreopenedconfusedbuffalo
♦18,101
4~ 2 years agocommentedconfusedbuffalo
♦18,101
Erroneously marked as resolved. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/paceban351/blocks
5~ 26 days agocommentedCar Tographer
♦520
It does, but the PROW layer on iD doesn't show it. Could do with a survey to check. #surveyme
6~ 25 days agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
This looks like an informal dog-walk/exercise route around the field edge. I've completed the route from Strava and added "informal=yes" to indicate that access is unclear.
19502971~ 6 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
DCC mapping indicates that Dead Man's car park is publically accessible?
2~ 27 days agocommentedceirios
♦3,794
I think the mapping here has changed since this note was made
3~ 26 days agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Agreed - the note no longer makes sense
34595361~ 3 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Route of tramway to Wolsingham Park Quarry?
2~ 30 days agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Belongs on OpenHistoricalMap
32631211~ 4 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Missing bridleway to W of beck?
2~ 1 month agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
De facto route seems to be E of becjk
32631201~ 4 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Missing bridge?
2~ 1 month agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Resolved
20760101~ 6 years agoopened---This is no longer a through route, becomes a footpath heading south
2~ 1 month agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Fixed
34940061~ 3 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Check junction here - Strava intensity follows footway
2~ 1 month agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Clarified
5348521
Category: Unknown
1~ 1 month agoopened---Framwellgate Bridge
2~ 1 month agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Indeed it is!
30483851~ 4 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Bridge here? https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/7082343
2~ 1 month agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed
32599411~ 4 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirm this as parking, and relation to separate parking area to east.
2~ 1 month agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Better tag as field occasionally used for parking
32599421~ 4 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Missing bus stop? Site relation for Crown Hotel seems incorrect.
2~ 1 month agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Missing bus stop added, although missing NAPTAN details
23540841~ 5 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Paths around here may be a bit confused
2~ 6 months agocommentedMallyGThe main path is quite clear, and most other paths lead back to the main one anyway.
3~ 1 month agocommentedInfinatum
♦186
There seems to be alot of paths which meet here, so looks correct to me. Might make a few tweeks. (But general layout is correct.
4~ 1 month agocommentedInfinatum
♦186
Just made some changes to the paths on the area
5~ 1 month agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Thanks! Let's close the note.
5377503
Category: Unknown
1~ 1 month agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Construction?
2~ 1 month agoclosedgurglypipe
♦1,838
Looks like it: https://www.brittonestates.co.uk/properties-for-sale/property/2794-20-swallows-rise-sockbridge-penrith Probably enough evidence to add a construction area. I’ll do that now
5338887
Category: Unknown
1~ 2 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Caravan site inside caravan site?
5338882
Category: Unknown
1~ 2 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
landuse-residential doesn't seem right for this area. garden? meadow if grazed?
5338101
Category: Unknown
1~ 2 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
This monument doesn't look right
5335642
Category: Unknown
1~ 2 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Fragmentary route labelled St Oswald's Way, but doesn't match route
5335641
Category: Unknown
1~ 2 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Is this really a culvert? Would be unusual to have a culvert + bridge
5335640
Category: Unknown
1~ 2 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Is access=no tagging correct here? Seems to be public bridleway
5332655
Category: Unknown
1~ 2 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Has this line been buried?
2~ 2 months agocommentedGinaroZ
♦7,929
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4119492694998603&focus=photo looks like it ends at this pole
5328770
Category: Unknown
1~ 2 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Based on Adopted Highways map, these tracks are all technically unclassified highways. But not obvious how to tag since clearly unsuitable for typical cars.
22434571~ 6 years agoopened---onosm.org submitted note from a business: name: Doggy Styles Dog Grooming phone: 07783 194070 website: www.doggystylesdoggroomingspa.co.uk twitter: undefined hours: category: address: Fisher Green, Ripon
2~ 9 months agocommentedMex
♦8,132
website no longer up
3~ 2 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Let's close this then.
4952962
Category: Unknown
1~ 11 months agoopened---Local press reports say has been closed since 2019, but has now reopened. Also the duplicate pub here needs deleting.
2~ 2 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Fixed.
5048041
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 9 months agoopeneduser_1344
♦250
There is a painted mini roundabout here via StreetComplete 61.3
2~ 2 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Mapping is correct
38503271~ 2 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Really part of hospital? Looks like pasture.
2~ 2 months agocommentedWibbleWobble
♦277
Walked past this yesterday, is indeed pasture, the community hospital is part of the medical practice building
3~ 2 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Great! I've tidied things up.
5307621
Category: Unknown
1~ 2 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Now moved to location on Central Avenue?
23814591~ 5 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Linestone LinX route description implies left sidewalk / pavement is shared foot/cycle.
2~ 5 years agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
Correction: *right* (E) sidewalk
3~ 2 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
No signage on ground.
23814581~ 5 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Limestone LinX route descriptions imply this sidewalk/pavement is shared foot/cycleway.
2~ 2 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Impossible to tell. Signage peters out.
5259311
Category: Unknown
1~ 3 months agoopened---Bagnall and Kirkwood has closed and moved to Rothbury Terrace, Heaton
2~ 2 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed gone, but missed checking what is now there.
3~ 1 month agoclosedspiffy mapper
♦937
it's now FEDS fried chicken, map fixed
19637151~ 6 years agoopened---onosm.org submitted note from a business: name: Joel’s Hobble phone: 01915846127 website: twitter: undefined hours: Monday-Friday 9AM - 5PM category: ,Cafeteria address: New college Durham
2~ 2 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
This is in the wrong place and very old.
26052641~ 5 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
DCC Adopted Highways data shows this as all Ayden Grove (not Bishops Walk)
2~ 2 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed
35210161~ 3 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
This path doesn't look right
2~ 3 months agoclosedMRJS_04
♦59
More up to date aerial imagery suggests that this was only ever quad tracks from someone farming cattle here, but it doesn't look like like there is a path there, so I deleted this path.
3~ 3 months agoreopenedMRJS_04
♦59
On further note, it looks like the path is very faint, so I will re-categorise it as an informal path. This probably should requires a survey to confirm in the future.
4~ 3 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
I can't remember now what I thought was odd. Adding informal makes sense. I'll close the note. Thanks!
4962295
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Area has been extensively redeveloped. Wait for imagery to catch up
2~ 3 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
ESRI imagery is up-to-date
32823641~ 4 years agoopenedconfusedbuffalo
♦18,101
Are there really 3 buildings here? Cadastral parcels and NSUL postcode layer make it look like just 2 #surveyme
2~ 3 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed from survey
28884301~ 4 years agoopenedconfusedbuffalo
♦18,101
Two number 7s here, something's not quite right
2~ 3 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Fixed from survey
32823651~ 4 years agoopenedconfusedbuffalo
♦18,101
Is this really number 7? Doesn't seem to fit the numbering pattern #surveyme
2~ 3 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Fixed from survey
36551641~ 3 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Route of FP 8 N and W is unclear
2~ 3 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Resolved
30448051~ 4 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Should be historic milestone about here https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/5624067
2~ 3 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed
30448091~ 4 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Should be historic milestone about here https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/5624068
2~ 3 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed
4397374
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Check usability of footpath - Strava traces suggest wood avoided
2~ 3 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Right of way has been adjusted
20932621~ 6 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Entrance to nature reserve?
2~ 3 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed
34226551~ 3 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Doctor's surgery?
2~ 3 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed
4746745
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 1 year agoopenedHyskell
♦1
Unable to answer "What type of shop is this?" – Timphson and Johnsons (Shop (Unspecified Type)) – https://osm.org/way/92344354 via StreetComplete 60.3: Key cutting, watch repairs, dry cleaning, shoe repairs, clothing repairs and alterations, engraving etc.
2~ 3 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
This is OK. It's now linked to the Timpson brand.
5261477
Category: Unknown
1~ 3 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Two separate University libraries with different opening hours? Distinguish or merge into one feature with separate building:part.
5253064
Category: Unknown
1~ 3 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Shadforth Cemetery seems to be distinct from St Cuthbert's graveyard. Demarkation unclear.
5230651
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopened---4 4 2026
2~ 3 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Not clear what this note means. Closing.
5250147
Category: Unknown
1~ 3 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Open for pedestrians and cycles?
5249100
Category: Unknown
1~ 3 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Something not right here - footway crosses service way without intersection
2~ 21 days agoclosedPaul Berry
♦2,272
Resolved on osm.org/changeset/186182570.
34496831~ 3 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Construction complete - new businesses need adding
2~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Done
5245967
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Acronyms don't really belong in the name tag. alt_name would be better.
2~ 3 months agoclosedntzm
♦506
Thanks, I've updated this and several others in this area.
5245962
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Wikidata implies there are two Y&L war memorials here (one for the Boer Wat). Labelling may be incorrect
2~ 3 months agoclosedntzm
♦506
Thanks, surveyed and updated
5245961
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Should be historic=milestone here https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q111788499
2~ 3 months agoclosedntzm
♦506
Thanks, surveyed and added
5239600
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Not clear how pedestrian routing would work here. Better for cycleway to be segregated cycleway with ped access?
2~ 4 months agocommentedntzm
♦506
Thanks for the heads up, I've added separated pavements. The whole area was redesigned recently
3~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
That looks much better!
34335531~ 3 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
This bridge looks strange.
2~ 4 months agocommentedInfinatum
♦186
Seems to be a bridge over the underpass. However the bridge and underpass seems to be closed during the demolition of bridge house. Unsure if this will ever reopen. changed tags to 'access=no'
3~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Thanks! I'll close the note.
5239626
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Doesn't look like a grave yard?
2~ 4 months agoclosedIslerman
♦4
5239499
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Area is a bit confusing. Two objects, one a restaurant, one a hotel. One a building, one a building:part. Separate building and two nodes within?
2~ 4 months agocommentedntzm
♦506
For context, the ground floor is a miller and carter steakhouse, upper floors are a hotel.
3~ 3 months agoclosedTheUKHighStreet
♦8,430
I think this has been fixed - the building is now tagged separately to the restaurant and hotel.
29797101~ 4 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Now closed? [No current FHRS data]
2~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Seems to be fixed.
39924401~ 2 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Does cycleway continue?
2~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Looks to be fixed.
5223351
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedAJZEDStart of private drive to house
2~ 4 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
The access tagging on this lane/drive looks completely wrong. I presume the drive up to the residential area is a public footpath and the footway leading S/SE is also a public FP? Assuming it is otherwise a private road and no other permission is granted (horse / bicycle etc.) then correct tagging would be access=private + foot=yes (on the public FP section) It's also a good idea to add designation=public_footpath on the sections that are public FPs. The track heading NE is also tagged with "access=permissive", which seems unlikely.
3~ 2 months agoclosedLordGarySugar
♦2,175
I have added private tagging, cleaned up the permissive tagging and tagged as public footpaths based on the prow overlay
5177202
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 5 months agoopenedxeonlto7
♦22
Wheelchair ramp here via StreetComplete 62.2
2~ 4 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
I think the map data is fine here. You separately map the steps and ramp, but this detail may be more confusing than thelpful.
5177201
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 5 months agoopenedxeonlto7
♦22
No ramp here for wheelchair via StreetComplete 62.2
2~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Already added
37386871~ 3 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
New building - wait for imagery
2~ 2 years agoclosedpaceban351All paid!
3~ 2 years agoreopenedconfusedbuffalo
♦18,101
Erroneously marked as resolved. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/paceban351/blocks
4~ 2 years agocommentedconfusedbuffalo
♦18,101
Erroneously marked as resolved. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/paceban351/blocks
5~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Added
4777864
Category: Organicmaps
1~ 1 year agoopenedJackalus
♦25
"Remove 'Food Cooperative' from name" OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: Abundant Earth Food Co-operative POI types: landuse-allotments #organicmaps android
2~ 1 year agocommentedJackalus
♦25
Rather, just remove 'Food' from name; leave 'Cooperative' as part of name.
3~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Done
5001169
Category: Organicmaps
1~ 10 months agoopenedJackalus
♦25
""DL16" postcode search incorrectly returns this place. DL16 is Spennymoor." OSM snapshot date: 2025-09-13T21:01:41Z POI has no name POI types: landuse-farmland #organicmaps android 2025.10.05-7-FDroid
2~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
There's nothing in the data that can change this - it will be a geocoding issue.
5204765
Category: CoMaps
1~ 4 months agoopenedJackalus
♦25
"ERROR. This is not Durham Road; it is Broom Lane. Durham Road is the name of the row of houses (1-30) to the north of Broom Lane and of the road that loops around the back of them. Google Maps has it right. Also, confirm by visiting the website of any of the businesses that list themselves on Broom Lane, for example, https://www.coop.co.uk/store-finder/DH7-7LQ/broom-lane" OSM snapshot date: 2025-12-27T02:09:53Z POI name: Durham Road POI types: psurface-paved_good highway-secondary #CoMaps android 2026.02.23-9-FDroid
2~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Agreed. I suspect it is a bit of both i.e. it is/was also called Durham Road, e.g. the service road behind is is listed "Durham Road (rear)". But Council Adopted Highways data gives Broom Lane. Changed.
5232626
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Strong Strava trace here. Clarify position with respect to tree line
5230274
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Clarify status of the "Chareway". Definitive Map and OS shows this as FP (not bridleway) and route differs here (FP heads straight on).
5230273
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Strong Strava trace along old railway route. De facto footway?
4379488
Category: unknown
1~ 2 years agoopenedDannie44This crossing has been realigned to cross the track at right angles. Its skewed presentation on the map is incorrect. The same applies to Bells Crossing a little further along the track (end of Burn Lane).
2~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
This looks to have been fixed.
5222206
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
The fences here seem to have gone. Perhaps these narrow field strips were temporary, or perhaps seasonal?
2~ 4 months agocommentedgurglypipe
♦1,838
Quite possibly. Perhaps mark them as demolished using a lifecycle prefix, to make it clear that they were removed after the aerial imagery was most recently updated?
3~ 4 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
I've done this for the upper fields, as I didn't see the fences when passing. It's not 100% clear from the imagery whether the fences in the "lower fields" have gone.
4~ 4 months agoclosedgurglypipe
♦1,838
Thanks. We can probably resolve this now?
36223311~ 3 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Historic milestone about here?
2~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed
4927030
Category: unknown
1~ 11 months agoopenedTheUKHighStreet
♦8,430
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435839884 Is this Grange Pharmacy?
2~ 11 months agocommentedgurglypipe
♦1,838
As in, is this no longer branded as Well Pharmacy and is instead operating independently? aiui Well sold off a load of branches in March 2025, so presumably that’s what you’re trying to check? https://grangecommunitypharmacy.com/about-us/ suggests that it’s still the same pharmacy operating from the same premises, just under different branding. Some of the older Google Reviews on the page call it ‘Well’. So yes, this probably should now be labelled as ‘Grange Pharmacy’, but I haven’t visited Grange in a little while so can’t confirm with a survey right now. Feel free to go ahead and change it anyway, I think there’s enough supporting evidence from the website.
3~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed and fixed.
40529111~ 2 years agoopened---"This is an open plot of land, but a water run off catchment area, definitely not a park. " The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2023-12-13T18:30:01Z POI name: Prudhoe Park POI types: leisure-park #organicmaps ios
2~ 4 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Since resolved
5217251
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Check correct. Looks like wall here
5211396
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Check routing of footpath on ground - doesn't look likely
5206478
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Service station has been demolished (Mar 2025) and is being rebuilt
2~ 1 month agoclosedspiffy mapper
♦937
has reopened, map updated
28112511~ 4 years agoopenedCjMalone
♦3,800
#surveyme Is this still Greggs? has something replaced it?
2~ 5 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Location updated
20263401~ 6 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Clarify paths and barriers here
2~ 5 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Improved
37480871~ 3 years agoopenedTheUKHighStreet
♦8,430
All M&Co stores have closed.
2~ 5 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed
4404292
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Now demolished and relocated to leisure centre?
2~ 5 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Yes
5195971
Category: Unknown
1~ 5 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Add node for library at suitable position
5151107
Category: Unknown
1~ 6 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Is this geometry correct? Doesn't match imagery
2~ 6 months agocommentedJames Derrick
♦1,017
Hi, Give both ESRI and Bing show a diagonal, I'd go for the edit. (Strava high-res seems to have gone HTTP 400, sadly.) Happy Mapping, James
4703846
Category: Organicmaps
1~ 1 year agoopenedJackalus
♦25
"Bridge now removed. May not be replaced." OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: Leazes footbridge POI types: hwtag-nobicycle hwtag-nofoot hwtag-private highway-cycleway-bridge #organicmaps android
2~ 1 year agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
Good point. Bridge removed. Leave note as reminder that replacement pedestrian crossings need to be added.
3~ 1 year agoclosedJackalus
♦25
It is removed at closest zoom scale but remains, along with blue dotted footpath, at so all wider zooms.
4~ 1 year agoreopenedJackalus
♦25
5~ 1 year agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
Some map renders take longer than other to update. The "Standard" display updates quickly, but you may need to clear your browser cache.
6~ 6 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Updated
4806963
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Area doesn't match current imagery. Needs survey
2~ 6 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Updated
4781162
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirm demolished
2~ 6 months agocommentedCjMalone
♦3,800
Probably Aldi now https://www.aldi.co.uk/store-finder/l/baillieston/11-boghall-road/c742
3~ 6 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
But presumably not the one in Glasgow?
4~ 6 months agocommentedCjMalone
♦3,800
(I don't like the new website! Too much JavaScript) https://www.aldi.co.uk/store-finder/l/durham/mill-road/c994
5134516
Category: Unknown
1~ 6 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Coffee at No. 10 has moved to Arcade?
4862688
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedYeomanry Survey
♦164
This Booths branch is to become a Tesco
2~ 1 year agocommentedLocator
♦189
Booths has closed. Building being converted to Tesco.
3~ 6 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Updated.
43158791~ 2 years agoopenedTheUKHighStreet
♦8,430
Is this Asda Express? https://storelocator.asda.com/yorkshire-&-humber/richmond/middleton-tyas-a1
2~ 6 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed and fixed.
5128271
Category: Unknown
1~ 6 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Is this path passable? No Strava trace. Looks very overgrown
5128272
Category: Unknown
1~ 6 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Check routing of Coxhoe Heritage 100 walk in this area - paths confusing!
23204101~ 5 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Should be footbridge here
2~ 7 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
confirmed
19498061~ 6 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Looks more like a track going up to Burton Beck Farm than a footway
2~ 7 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Resolved from imagery
19498081~ 6 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Burton Beck in culvert?
2~ 7 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Resolved from imagery
5119060
Category: Unknown
1~ 7 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Better described as cycleway? motor vehicle traffic seems to be prohibited
5119037
Category: Unknown
1~ 7 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
toilets? in use?
35086921~ 3 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
NAPTAN data suggests additional bus stop
2~ 7 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Located
5113649
Category: Unknown
1~ 7 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Check status of this nursery. Beech Tree nursery?
5113650
Category: Unknown
1~ 7 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Clarify status of this grassy area. Meadow, recreation ground?
23204091~ 5 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirm whether private road to church does connect
2~ 3 years agocommentedMuloMulo
♦18
It does connect, but is definitely private, no right of way -- I've been turned away on 28/5/23
3~ 3 years agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
Interesting (and disappointing). The access road to the church must be public, but there are no rights of way otherwise in the grounds. There are marked trails in the grounds: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/ But perhaps this permissive access has been withdrawn by new owners? [Leave open until current trail routes confirmed]
4~ 7 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed. Have changed the access to indicate that permissive access seems to have been withdrawn. Left routes as-is until updated.
37312281~ 3 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Imagery suggests better tagged as service alley for Kendal Close?
2~ 7 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed
5087674
Category: Unknown
1~ 8 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Does footway connect with car park? Way of Learning route is currently broken at this point
5087673
Category: Unknown
1~ 8 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Bit of a mess here. Has bridleway been altered to leave road further N?
4801315
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedMateusz Konieczny
♦39,332
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/269919868/history Is it gate or stile? Is there really a stile here? If yes, then barrier=stile is missing. If no then stile= for stile subtype makes little sense. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:barrier=stile#Stile_types http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1c3g finds about 300 other similar issues
2~ 10 months agoclosedRebeccaParrisThere is neither a gate nor a stile
3~ 10 months agoreopenedMateusz Konieczny
♦39,332
4~ 10 months agocommentedMateusz Konieczny
♦39,332
then stile=squeezer should be removed, right?
5~ 8 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Fixed.
38396261~ 2 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Does this cross path exist? No trace on imagery
2~ 9 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Looks to have gone
41999121~ 2 years agoopened---Bishop Auckland Retail and Leisure Park has been built on this Site. Currently Popeye's, Greggs, Pure Gym and Home Bargins are open or will open within the next month. More businesses to follow.
2~ 1 year agocommentedRobert Whittaker
♦1,747
I've mapped the roads and buildings in the first phase from Esri World Imagery. Now needs someone local to do a survey to map the occupants. #surveyme
3~ 9 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Looks pretty much done!
34538211~ 3 years agoopenedSDAVDIs it definitely 60mph here? Feels like a 30 with the streetlights, and the NSL signs prior to the A1M roundabout.
2~ 3 years agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
There were no signs indicating a lower limit, but signage is definitely odd, with nothing on reverse of NSL sign. Suspect lighting is for cycles/pedestrians. Didn't otherwise feel like 30 mph zone.
3~ 9 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
I've re-driven over this section and it is clearly 60+. S section is divided highway, so I suspect that the one-side NSL signs are saying "definitely 60 mph from here".
5022903
Category: Unknown
1~ 9 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Does this "Conservation Walk" still exist? Either way, should be converted to route relation.
5022771
Category: Unknown
1~ 9 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
This permissive footpath looks unlikely- straight through buildings
2~ 9 months agoclosedMex
♦8,132
moved to be more in line with PROW layer and added buildings
33374421~ 3 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
New leisure centre building?
2~ 9 months agocommentedMex
♦8,132
already mapped?
3~ 9 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
I mapped the building (based on imagery), but it wasn't clear whether it was an extension of the existing centre / replacement of something new.
4957577
Category: Unknown
1~ 11 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Imagery suggests this is not lanes=2. no lane markings?
2~ 10 months agocommentedJames Derrick
♦1,017
Hi, I'd suggest as it's still wide enough for passing: lanes=2 lane_markings=no https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:lanes=2
3~ 9 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Agreed!
5002337
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Area has been redeveloped - wait for imagery to catch up
2~ 8 months agocommentedspiffy mapper
♦937
ESRI has much more recent imagery, but not really sure what I'm looking for.
3~ 7 months agocommentedInfinatum
♦186
Seems to now be a Dinosaur Themed Crazy Golf Course I believe its called Dinosaur Cove. Its on both sided of the footpath to the amusement arcade. and it looks like you can see it on Esri World Imagery.
4~ 7 months agocommentedInfinatum
♦186
Added Miniature Golf as seen on Esri World Imagery. Assume the building is the Jurassic Grill
5~ 5 months agoclosedInfinatum
♦186
Added Site
4997972
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Has this information centre closed?
2~ 3 months agocommentedJames Derrick
♦1,017
Hi, No separate signs, and this part of the building looked like a gift shop when driving past.
4997947
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Isn't this Flodden Lodge?
2~ 5 months agoclosedswefre
38255861~ 3 years agoopenedMatyjaceForwarding anonymous report from #Mapy.cz user, please verify: "closed"
2~ 10 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Confirmed.
38992051~ 2 years agoopened---Breakout Cafe within Currie RFC building.
2~ 10 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Added
4854834
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedTheUKHighStreet
♦8,430
Is this Jozef's Restaurant & Bar Durham? https://www.radissonhotels.com/en-us/hotels/radisson-blu-durham/dining/jozefs
2~ 10 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Yes - must be a re-brand
4878265
Category: Organicmaps
1~ 1 year agoopenedJason67
♦81
"Kapazität: 8" OSM snapshot date: 2025-07-08T15:45:36Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-bicycle_parking #organicmaps ios
2~ 10 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
Not expecting a name for bicycle parking. Should capacity=8 be added?
3~ 10 months agoclosedJason67
♦81
yes
38637221~ 2 years agoopenedPeter Newman
♦2,992
Home bargains opening Nov via StreetComplete 53.3
2~ 2 years agoclosedpaceban351All paid!
3~ 2 years agoreopenedPeter Newman
♦2,992
4~ 10 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Added
4981094
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 10 months agoopenedavantman42
♦218
Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – Grass – https://osm.org/way/566363973 via StreetComplete 61.3: Check tagging. StreetComplete says it's a vacant shop, but it's a grassy area
2~ 10 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
It was tagged as disused:amenity=school (relating to former Gilesgate Sixth Form Centre). Changed this to "was:amenity=school" which should stop the SC questions.
4986654
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Blakehope Burn continues
4983379
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Road seems to be an unclassified highway formally, but looks unsurfaced?
22539001~ 6 years agoopenedCjMalone
♦3,800
Post office may have moved west to Ewesley Road. Please survey. pol_branch_list_2020‑02‑20
2~ 10 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Moved in 2023?
4981888
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
If chapel is derelict, it can't be a place of worship?
7589211~ 9 years agoopened---Bishopwearmouth Horticultural Nursery
2~ 10 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Garden centre now mapped
4981803
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Bus stops misplaced in this area
37209911~ 3 years agoopenedawilliamsonukChester Gate homes should be built now
2~ 10 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
They are yet to appear on the freely available imagery mappers can work from. But a ground survey would be useful to sort out the roads.
23782511~ 5 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Should be path on left leading up to walkway
2~ 10 months agocommentedHubertusO
♦32
Rhetorically not, practically yes
3~ 10 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
If it's a useful / usable path, I would add it with something like "surface=dirt" (?) and "informal=yes". If it's an unsafe, hairy scramble, then probably not.
41195521~ 2 years agoopenedDannie44Unable to answer "What kind of building is this?" – Albert Edward Club – https://osm.org/way/557377840 via StreetComplete 56.1: Private Members Club. Don't know appropriate use category
2~ 10 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Fixed
37471501~ 3 years agoopenedswise
♦58
Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" for https://osm.org/way/132789404 via StreetComplete 53.1: Stairs and bridge both in grippy grit surface, will search for correct term Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/156557.jpg
2~ 10 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
I tend to use surface=chipseal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dchipseal for this kind of thing - grit pressed into a surface.
27009561~ 5 years agoopenedJack DonnellyThis should denote the athletics complex attached to the Wentworth Leisure Centre, including their track and field facilities. Currently, you cannot determine who this feature belongs to and the function it serves, (as part of the Wentworth Leisure Centre). There should be a basic identification of the 8 lane track, the multi-purpose sports field, which is adapted for field events in athletics as well as competitive football matches. Furthermore, there should be an indication of the use of these facilities for international sporting events as well as local events and the fact that this facility plays home to Tynedale Athletics Club. This could be depicted using a photograph, highlighting it's link to the local community and it's athletes.
2~ 4 years agocommentedjambamkin
♦1,714
Hi Jack, Not sure what you mean here. The running track and sports field are both on the map. I can only count 6 lanes on the track from aerial photography. Photographs can be linked to the map database, but these would usually be of the mapped object and not of a related club. James
3~ 10 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
Clarified area of leisure centre. It would make sense to break up the awkward multipolygon which encompasses the track, but also other features. This makes it hard to see what is present.
4973835
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Does this farm shop / cafe still exist?
4969465
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
cycleway=opposite_lane doesn't make sense here (2 way street)
4969466
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Sign here stated "private road", so motor_vehicle=yes seems wrong. customers perhaps?
4969287
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Now 30 mph?
4969288
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
50 mph rather than 60?
4966613
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Now 40 mph rather than 50?
4793210
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
There are several stops along Pond Street. Would be useful to map them.
2~ 10 months agocommentedCanopyFalls
♦604
Where are the stops and how many? Are they to the north of the note's location? Would be great to get a survey of them with photos of all the signs and locations. Create a note for each one and place it as close to the location of the stop and I'll go in and add them all if you give me a message.
3~ 10 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
I only noted in passing that the bus stops in OSM didn't match reality. I would map if local!
4~ 10 months agocommentedCanopyFalls
♦604
TYSM for the reply! #surveyme Confirm locations of bus stops on the West side of Pond Street. (Reminder for me to check them when I'm next over here.)
5~ 10 months agocommentedCanopyFalls
♦604
Added notes about locations of bus stops.
6~ 2 months agoclosedntzm
♦506
I have added the missing stops from Naptan data, thanks
4614208
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Does this long address interpolation way with occasional numbers on it serve a useful purpose?
2~ 10 months agocommentedCanopyFalls
♦604
It allows routing engines to guess the location of addresses that nobody has been able to fix to a building in survey yet. Could absolutely do with a survey.
3~ 10 months agocommentedphodgkin
♦2,402
But I just don't think it is accurate / meaningful. It can only have been added from historical mapping since the section from 1-127 goes through a redeveloped area. There are plenty of accurately numbered properties along Ecclesall Road. The shorter interpolations are fine, but this long one seems to make things worse.
4~ 10 months agoclosedCanopyFalls
♦604
Hadn't noticed quite how well mapped this road was, after checking it over you're absolutely right, that's just gonna be getting in the way and is basically junk data now. Have deleted and will make a note to survey along here when I get the chance to fill in any missing addressed.
41612671~ 2 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Doesn't look like a service road
2~ 11 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Retagged as abandoned.
4957576
Category: Unknown
1~ 11 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Speed restriction on this tertiary road?
4954894
Category: Unknown
1~ 11 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
There are two Cleadon Park Post Offices in this area. It looks like neither is operational?
2~ 8 months agoclosedspiffy mapper
♦937
Agree both gone, confirmed from multiple sources. The eastern one was inside a newsagent which has gone. Updated
4952835
Category: Unknown
1~ 11 months agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Building has been replaced with new Diagnostics Centre. Wait for imagery to catch up
2~ 8 months agoclosedspiffy mapper
♦937
added from ESRI imagery
38261781~ 3 years agoopenedRobert Whittaker
♦1,747
Are there more individual shops to be mapped here? #surveyme
2~ 11 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Pretty well mapped now
4567856
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 1 year agoopenedavantman42
♦218
Unable to answer "Do these steps have a handrail?" – Steps – https://osm.org/way/150854466 via StreetComplete 60.0: Not steps
2~ 11 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Fixed
31965361~ 4 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
Former Field House opencast mine. Now being restored (Spring 2022). Wait for imagery to catch up.
2~ 11 months agocommentedHubertusO
♦32
I've seen it on Google satellite view, and It looks for agriculture fields.
3~ 11 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Thanks! Updated from ESRI imagery (which we can use).
4855025
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedTheUKHighStreet
♦8,430
Is this The Seaglass Cafe Bar & Kitchen? https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/1791505
2~ 11 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Featherbed Cafe, but yes.
34871101~ 3 years agoopenedphodgkin
♦2,402
NLS historic OS mapping shows railway crossing burn here (NPE clearly shows a line continuing on S bank).
2~ 11 months agoclosedphodgkin
♦2,402
Railway did cross