| Note | # | Tmstmp UTC | Event | Contributor | Comment | Auto-translation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5087673 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-12-11 19:50 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Bit of a mess here. Has bridleway been altered to leave road further N? | |
| 5087674 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-12-11 19:50 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Does footway connect with car park? Way of Learning route is currently broken at this point | |
| 4801315 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-11 19:57 | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,579 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/269919868/history Is it gate or stile? Is there really a stile here? If yes, then barrier=stile is missing. If no then stile= for stile subtype makes little sense. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:barrier=stile#Stile_types http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1c3g finds about 300 other similar issues | |
| 2 | 2025-10-01 21:52 | closed | RebeccaParris | There is neither a gate nor a stile | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-02 08:23 | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,579 | |||
| 4 | 2025-10-02 08:23 | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,579 | then stile=squeezer should be removed, right? | ||
| 5 | 2025-11-22 13:45 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Fixed. | ||
| 3839626 | 1 | 2023-08-17 21:17 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Does this cross path exist? No trace on imagery | |
| 2 | 2025-11-09 17:34 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Looks to have gone | ||
| 4199912 | 1 | 2024-04-15 16:03 | opened | --- | Bishop Auckland Retail and Leisure Park has been built on this Site. Currently Popeye's, Greggs, Pure Gym and Home Bargins are open or will open within the next month. More businesses to follow. | |
| 2 | 2025-07-30 19:53 | commented | Robert Whittaker ♦1,647 | I've mapped the roads and buildings in the first phase from Esri World Imagery. Now needs someone local to do a survey to map the occupants. #surveyme | ||
| 3 | 2025-11-06 19:23 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Looks pretty much done! | ||
| 3453821 | 1 | 2022-11-24 07:52 | opened | SDAVD | Is it definitely 60mph here? Feels like a 30 with the streetlights, and the NSL signs prior to the A1M roundabout. | |
| 2 | 2023-02-19 20:49 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | There were no signs indicating a lower limit, but signage is definitely odd, with nothing on reverse of NSL sign. Suspect lighting is for cycles/pedestrians. Didn't otherwise feel like 30 mph zone. | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-29 18:35 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | I've re-driven over this section and it is clearly 60+. S section is divided highway, so I suspect that the one-side NSL signs are saying "definitely 60 mph from here". | ||
| 5022903 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-25 20:21 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Does this "Conservation Walk" still exist? Either way, should be converted to route relation. | |
| 5022771 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-25 18:16 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | This permissive footpath looks unlikely- straight through buildings | |
| 2 | 2025-10-27 14:14 | closed | Mex ♦7,210 | moved to be more in line with PROW layer and added buildings | ||
| 3337442 | 1 | 2022-08-29 20:16 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | New leisure centre building? | |
| 2 | 2025-10-20 16:40 | commented | Mex ♦7,210 | already mapped? | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-20 19:57 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | I mapped the building (based on imagery), but it wasn't clear whether it was an extension of the existing centre / replacement of something new. | ||
| 4957577 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-11 18:27 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Imagery suggests this is not lanes=2. no lane markings? | |
| 2 | 2025-10-12 18:35 | commented | James Derrick ♦957 | Hi, I'd suggest as it's still wide enough for passing: lanes=2 lane_markings=no https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:lanes=2 | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-13 08:18 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Agreed! | ||
| 5002337 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-12 14:07 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Area has been redeveloped - wait for imagery to catch up | |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 15:35 | commented | spiffy mapper ♦867 | ESRI has much more recent imagery, but not really sure what I'm looking for. | ||
| 4997972 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-09 12:23 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Has this information centre closed? | |
| 4997947 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-09 12:04 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Isn't this Flodden Lodge? | |
| 3825586 | 1 | 2023-08-10 05:30 | opened | Matyjace | Forwarding anonymous report from #Mapy.cz user, please verify: "closed" | |
| 2 | 2025-10-05 16:12 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Confirmed. | ||
| 3899205 | 1 | 2023-09-20 15:35 | opened | --- | Breakout Cafe within Currie RFC building. | |
| 2 | 2025-10-03 20:21 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Added | ||
| 4854834 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-14 11:00 | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,755 | Is this Jozef's Restaurant & Bar Durham? https://www.radissonhotels.com/en-us/hotels/radisson-blu-durham/dining/jozefs | |
| 2 | 2025-10-01 17:04 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Yes - must be a re-brand | ||
| 4878265 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-07-27 13:29 | opened | Jason67 ♦70 | "Kapazität: 8" OSM snapshot date: 2025-07-08T15:45:36Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-bicycle_parking #organicmaps ios | Capacity: 8 |
| 2 | 2025-10-01 17:01 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Not expecting a name for bicycle parking. Should capacity=8 be added? | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-01 19:59 | closed | Jason67 ♦70 | yes | ||
| 3863722 | 1 | 2023-08-31 14:17 | opened | Peter Newman ♦2,686 | Home bargains opening Nov via StreetComplete 53.3 | |
| 2 | 2024-03-03 16:42 | closed | paceban351 | All paid! | ||
| 3 | 2024-03-03 17:07 | reopened | Peter Newman ♦2,686 | |||
| 4 | 2025-10-01 16:57 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Added | ||
| 4978676 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-25 11:45 | opened | --- | Durham Unit | |
| 2 | 2025-10-01 16:44 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | This needs more information! | ||
| 4981094 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-27 08:07 | opened | avantman42 ♦199 | Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – Grass – https://osm.org/way/566363973 via StreetComplete 61.3: Check tagging. StreetComplete says it's a vacant shop, but it's a grassy area | |
| 2 | 2025-10-01 16:43 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | It was tagged as disused:amenity=school (relating to former Gilesgate Sixth Form Centre). Changed this to "was:amenity=school" which should stop the SC questions. | ||
| 4986654 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-01 12:40 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Blakehope Burn continues | |
| 4983379 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-28 18:05 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Road seems to be an unclassified highway formally, but looks unsurfaced? | |
| 2253900 | 1 | 2020-07-05 09:01 | opened | CjMalone ♦3,657 | Post office may have moved west to Ewesley Road. Please survey. pol_branch_list_2020‑02‑20 | |
| 2 | 2025-09-27 20:43 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Moved in 2023? | ||
| 4981888 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-27 17:31 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | If chapel is derelict, it can't be a place of worship? | |
| 758921 | 1 | 2016-10-24 11:44 | opened | --- | Bishopwearmouth Horticultural Nursery | |
| 2 | 2025-09-27 16:42 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Garden centre now mapped | ||
| 4981803 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-27 16:31 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Bus stops misplaced in this area | |
| 3720991 | 1 | 2023-06-05 02:04 | opened | awilliamsonuk | Chester Gate homes should be built now | |
| 2 | 2025-09-27 14:58 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | They are yet to appear on the freely available imagery mappers can work from. But a ground survey would be useful to sort out the roads. | ||
| 2378251 | 1 | 2020-10-08 08:01 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Should be path on left leading up to walkway | |
| 2 | 2025-09-25 15:19 | commented | HubertusO ♦32 | Rhetorically not, practically yes | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-26 15:34 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | If it's a useful / usable path, I would add it with something like "surface=dirt" (?) and "informal=yes". If it's an unsafe, hairy scramble, then probably not. | ||
| 4119552 | 1 | 2024-02-19 15:00 | opened | Dannie44 | Unable to answer "What kind of building is this?" – Albert Edward Club – https://osm.org/way/557377840 via StreetComplete 56.1: Private Members Club. Don't know appropriate use category | |
| 2 | 2025-09-25 18:39 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Fixed | ||
| 3747150 | 1 | 2023-06-23 09:42 | opened | swise ♦55 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" for https://osm.org/way/132789404 via StreetComplete 53.1: Stairs and bridge both in grippy grit surface, will search for correct term Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/156557.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-09-24 20:57 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | I tend to use surface=chipseal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dchipseal for this kind of thing - grit pressed into a surface. | ||
| 2700956 | 1 | 2021-06-06 08:56 | opened | Jack Donnelly | This should denote the athletics complex attached to the Wentworth Leisure Centre, including their track and field facilities. Currently, you cannot determine who this feature belongs to and the function it serves, (as part of the Wentworth Leisure Centre). There should be a basic identification of the 8 lane track, the multi-purpose sports field, which is adapted for field events in athletics as well as competitive football matches. Furthermore, there should be an indication of the use of these facilities for international sporting events as well as local events and the fact that this facility plays home to Tynedale Athletics Club. This could be depicted using a photograph, highlighting it's link to the local community and it's athletes. | |
| 2 | 2022-02-12 17:24 | commented | jambamkin ♦1,603 | Hi Jack, Not sure what you mean here. The running track and sports field are both on the map. I can only count 6 lanes on the track from aerial photography. Photographs can be linked to the map database, but these would usually be of the mapped object and not of a related club. James | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-24 20:53 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Clarified area of leisure centre. It would make sense to break up the awkward multipolygon which encompasses the track, but also other features. This makes it hard to see what is present. | ||
| 4973835 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-21 20:44 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Does this farm shop / cafe still exist? | |
| 4969465 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-19 20:17 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | cycleway=opposite_lane doesn't make sense here (2 way street) | |
| 4969466 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-19 20:17 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Sign here stated "private road", so motor_vehicle=yes seems wrong. customers perhaps? | |
| 4969287 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-19 17:55 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Now 30 mph? | |
| 4969288 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-19 17:55 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | 50 mph rather than 60? | |
| 4966613 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-17 20:39 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Now 40 mph rather than 50? | |
| 4793210 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-06 20:31 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | There are several stops along Pond Street. Would be useful to map them. | |
| 2 | 2025-09-13 19:59 | commented | CanopyFalls ♦517 | Where are the stops and how many? Are they to the north of the note's location? Would be great to get a survey of them with photos of all the signs and locations. Create a note for each one and place it as close to the location of the stop and I'll go in and add them all if you give me a message. | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-15 09:59 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | I only noted in passing that the bus stops in OSM didn't match reality. I would map if local! | ||
| 4 | 2025-09-15 10:21 | commented | CanopyFalls ♦517 | TYSM for the reply! #surveyme Confirm locations of bus stops on the West side of Pond Street. (Reminder for me to check them when I'm next over here.) | ||
| 5 | 2025-09-19 15:51 | commented | CanopyFalls ♦517 | Added notes about locations of bus stops. | ||
| 4614208 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-04 21:11 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Does this long address interpolation way with occasional numbers on it serve a useful purpose? | |
| 2 | 2025-09-13 19:32 | commented | CanopyFalls ♦517 | It allows routing engines to guess the location of addresses that nobody has been able to fix to a building in survey yet. Could absolutely do with a survey. | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-15 09:58 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | But I just don't think it is accurate / meaningful. It can only have been added from historical mapping since the section from 1-127 goes through a redeveloped area. There are plenty of accurately numbered properties along Ecclesall Road. The shorter interpolations are fine, but this long one seems to make things worse. | ||
| 4 | 2025-09-15 10:33 | closed | CanopyFalls ♦517 | Hadn't noticed quite how well mapped this road was, after checking it over you're absolutely right, that's just gonna be getting in the way and is basically junk data now. Have deleted and will make a note to survey along here when I get the chance to fill in any missing addressed. | ||
| 4962295 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-14 20:16 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Area has been extensively redeveloped. Wait for imagery to catch up | |
| 4161267 | 1 | 2024-03-20 22:09 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Doesn't look like a service road | |
| 2 | 2025-09-12 18:05 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Retagged as abandoned. | ||
| 4957576 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-11 18:27 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Speed restriction on this tertiary road? | |
| 4954894 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-09 21:58 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | There are two Cleadon Park Post Offices in this area. It looks like neither is operational? | |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:04 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦867 | Agree both gone, confirmed from multiple sources. The eastern one was inside a newsagent which has gone. Updated | ||
| 4952835 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-08 17:13 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Building has been replaced with new Diagnostics Centre. Wait for imagery to catch up | |
| 2 | 2025-12-06 18:08 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦867 | added from ESRI imagery | ||
| 3826178 | 1 | 2023-08-10 13:26 | opened | Robert Whittaker ♦1,647 | Are there more individual shops to be mapped here? #surveyme | |
| 2 | 2025-08-25 14:31 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Pretty well mapped now | ||
| 4567856 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-12-29 12:01 | opened | avantman42 ♦199 | Unable to answer "Do these steps have a handrail?" – Steps – https://osm.org/way/150854466 via StreetComplete 60.0: Not steps | |
| 2 | 2025-08-25 11:57 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Fixed | ||
| 3196536 | 1 | 2022-05-26 19:44 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Former Field House opencast mine. Now being restored (Spring 2022). Wait for imagery to catch up. | |
| 2 | 2025-08-25 08:04 | commented | HubertusO ♦32 | I've seen it on Google satellite view, and It looks for agriculture fields. | ||
| 3 | 2025-08-25 11:45 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Thanks! Updated from ESRI imagery (which we can use). | ||
| 4855025 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-14 13:02 | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,755 | Is this The Seaglass Cafe Bar & Kitchen? https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/1791505 | |
| 2 | 2025-08-18 19:35 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Featherbed Cafe, but yes. | ||
| 3487110 | 1 | 2022-12-22 11:52 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | NLS historic OS mapping shows railway crossing burn here (NPE clearly shows a line continuing on S bank). | |
| 2 | 2025-08-15 19:56 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Railway did cross | ||
| 434005 | 1 | 2015-09-13 17:58 | opened | LivingWithDragons ♦1,001 | There were distinct paths here. Needs surveying on foot (not a bicycle). | |
| 2 | 2024-03-03 16:41 | closed | paceban351 | All paid! | ||
| 3 | 2024-03-03 17:45 | reopened | confusedbuffalo ♦16,975 | Erroneously marked as resolved. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/paceban351/blocks | ||
| 4 | 2024-03-03 17:48 | commented | confusedbuffalo ♦16,975 | Erroneously marked as resolved. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/paceban351/blocks | ||
| 5 | 2025-08-11 17:48 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Very overgrown now - not visible on ground | ||
| 4892514 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-04 20:12 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Still a traffic light controlled junction? Doesn't seem to match current imagery | |
| 4413664 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-09-01 12:28 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Check logic of cycleways here. Council cycling map suggests path through park is a cycleway | |
| 2 | 2025-08-02 20:53 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Resolved from survey | ||
| 4889055 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-02 19:28 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Clarify if still part of cycle routes now fully oneway | |
| 2091268 | 1 | 2020-02-15 21:33 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | S&D railway marker about here? | |
| 2 | 2025-07-25 16:35 | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,706 | Can only see these two stone blocks with some threads in them Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/293471.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/293472.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-28 08:01 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Some of these markers may have gone, but the geograph image looks reasonably current: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Old_Boundary_Marker_by_disused_railway_bed,_Stanhope_Parish_(geograph_6045574).jpg These blocks are original sleepers from the Stockton and Darlington, so closely related! | ||
| 4 | 2025-07-28 10:27 | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,706 | That geograph image is tagged 200m further south than this note, just south of where the power lines cross the road. So that could explain why I couldn’t find anything! I’ll leave the note open in case someone else can take a look. I did some reading and it seems this was a cable-pulled railway incline with a stationary engine at the top. I assume the threaded stone blocks were for cable guides then — they’re all aligned centrally in the track bed, and there aren’t anywhere near enough of them to act as sleepers. | ||
| 5 | 2025-07-28 17:32 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | That's interesting. There are two wikidata items (corresponding to 2 listed structures) close together: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q26568075 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q26568076 I suspect the photo has been attached to the wrong one (and the northerly one is missing) or there are duplicates in the database. | ||
| 6 | 2025-07-31 15:53 | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,706 | I’m not sure if I’ll get a chance to go there and resurvey. From my trip along the Frosterley Cut today, there are plenty more markers up there. From some reading about the railway, these seem to be boundary markers rather than (as I’d assumed) milestones. The railway land was leased, rather than purchased, so they might be to mark the extent of the leased area. There are loads of them near the Frosterley Cut, on both sides of the railway corridor. | ||
| 4878877 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-27 17:54 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Short section of service road doesn't make sense. Presumably Church Lane is a private service road which has the designation of a public bridleway? | |
| 4855460 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-14 17:57 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Area has changed. Wait for imagery to catch up | |
| 3680600 | 1 | 2023-05-08 18:03 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Car park is a bit of a mess | |
| 2 | 2025-07-13 16:21 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Improved but fundamentally tricky because roadways on two levels | ||
| 4851181 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-12 10:28 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | This doesn't look right. On the ground could only see the driveway to Brundholme. Is there really a separate cycleway? There was no signage indicated designated cycle access and no indication of a PRoW on OS maps. | |
| 4851157 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-12 10:00 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Path was marked as washed away in 2016, but looks to have reinstated (at least up to point surveyed). Supported by Strava heatmap. Access is unclear - OS marks short section as "permissive", but no signs evident. | |
| 4851138 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-12 09:51 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | There's a strong Strava trace here correponding to a way that has been tagged as a disused footway. This is clearly not correct, even if it should be access=private. | |
| 4850582 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-11 20:56 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Unlikely that there are two Keswick Park Hotels? | |
| 4845367 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-08 20:40 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Is this really a 30 mph stretch? | |
| 4843496 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-07 18:22 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | The paths here don't look right | |
| 4837791 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-03 18:12 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Area is denoted as a leisure=park but also mostly overlapped by a grassland area. Which is better tagging? [Presence of sheep grazing in imagery suggests this is not a municipal park!] | |
| 2 | 2025-07-04 00:19 | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,706 | leisure=park seems reasonable. It’s National Trust land, but aiui is accessible all the time and is used for bigger events (like Keswick Mountain Festival). Grazing might be seasonal. See https://www.keswick.org/what-to-do/parksinkeswick | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-04 13:48 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | The website description sounds more like a recreation ground? [It's rather different to Hope Park next door]. Either way, the area should be one thing rather than two overlapped features. | ||
| 4 | 2025-07-04 14:01 | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,706 | Sure, that would also work. Get rid of the landuse=grass and retag the existing park as landuse=recreation_ground surface=grass operator=National Trust and maybe a note about how it’s occasionally grazed? | ||
| 5 | 2025-07-04 17:16 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Done! | ||
| 4838726 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-04 12:31 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Clarify current use of this centre. website link is defunct. Seems to be distinct from other Hawse End Centre to S (different postcode). | |
| 4838657 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-04 11:34 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Some of the paths and streams in this area look odd. Shold this stream be Withe Sike, which has a very different route in OpenData StreetView? | |
| 4336277 | 1 | 2024-07-16 18:09 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Should this field be part of the Coniston Hall campsite? It certainly looks from imagery to be a campsite. | |
| 2 | 2025-06-15 17:26 | commented | Simon Kellett ♦22 | Yes/no - normally it's sheep grazing, but I think it's a summer only (or summer school holidays only) overflow (not sure of dates etc) | ||
| 3 | 2025-06-16 17:17 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | That's very useful feedback. I've tagged it with `landuse=meadow` (but without `meadow=pasture`) with a note that it is used as an overflow. That should capture the idea. | ||
| 4807358 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-15 16:27 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Is there still a spa and separate sports centre? website only refers to a "fitness suite" | |
| 4806963 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-15 12:55 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Area doesn't match current imagery. Needs survey | |
| 4649799 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-03 14:26 | opened | user_1344 ♦198 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Broadgates (Foot Path) – https://osm.org/way/1162241586 via StreetComplete 60.1: How to define this? See image Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/263682.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-07 16:14 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | surface=paving_stones makes most sense (since mapped as footway). Updated | ||
| 4649800 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-03 14:26 | opened | user_1344 ♦198 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Broadgates (Foot Path) – https://osm.org/way/26730666 via StreetComplete 60.1: Stone slabs not concrete slabs... Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/263683.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-07 16:12 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Updated surface | ||
| 4649811 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-03-03 14:29 | opened | user_1344 ♦198 | Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – house name Blagraves: House – https://osm.org/way/1033636609 via StreetComplete 60.1: See the images Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/263684.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/263685.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-06-07 16:11 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Consistent with current mapping | ||
| 4794344 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-07 15:05 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | DCC Adopted Highways data shows this as Queen Street | |
| 2 | 2025-10-25 13:23 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦867 | yes, it's Queen St south of here. fixed | ||
| 4637212 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-22 13:05 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Strava trace shows significant detour here | |
| 2 | 2025-06-01 17:18 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | resolved from survey | ||
| 4649746 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-03 13:48 | opened | --- | Expert Fire Solutions | |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 17:44 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Confirmed and added | ||
| 3584608 | 1 | 2023-03-04 19:04 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Check whether NCN 165 has been re-routed through Winston | |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 14:53 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | No evidence it has. Closing note. | ||
| 4415245 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-09-02 09:18 | opened | user_1344 ♦198 | Kissing gate via StreetComplete 58.1 | |
| 2 | 2025-05-30 20:23 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Added | ||
| 4415246 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-09-02 09:18 | opened | user_1344 ♦198 | Sewage farm via StreetComplete 58.1 | |
| 2 | 2025-05-30 20:21 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Already tagged as waste water plant | ||
| 4782525 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-30 19:39 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | New buildings on this site - wait for imagery to update | |
| 4781162 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-29 19:54 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Confirm demolished | |
| 3584609 | 1 | 2023-03-04 19:04 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Check current signage - has NCN 165 been re-routed through Winston? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-27 20:42 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Doesn't look like it. Closing note. | ||
| 4752291 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-10 17:27 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Strange isolated sections of cycleway around roudabout. Check local signage | |
| 2 | 2025-05-16 20:13 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Gateshead cycling map shows these as footways (possibly bicycle=dismount?). Consistent with lack of signage. | ||
| 2354083 | 1 | 2020-09-18 20:00 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Strava trace puts path / footway inside scrub area rather than field edge | |
| 2 | 2025-05-11 17:30 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Mapping seems to have moved on. | ||
| 4573153 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-02 16:40 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Gap in shared cycleway here? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-10 18:14 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Clarification: neighbouring footways (bot not this one) are tagged bicycle=yes, which implies a shared cycleway. | ||
| 3 | 2025-07-26 19:57 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦867 | this isn't a shared cycleway, there are no signs at all to suggest cycling is allowed here. bicycle=yes removed. | ||
| 4138480 | 1 | 2024-03-03 21:39 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Is there any reason why this stretch of the metro line is railway=rail while the rest of the Metro network is railway=light_rail? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-03 22:55 | commented | Infinatum ♦148 | Noted this a few weeks back, My best guess is that this section of the line is shared with the line to the Prax Jarrow Terminal. The metro line used to be separate, but was changed a few years back, since it used to be a single metro track. (you can see the branch near the Tyne Tunnel / A19). So the track is both freight and Light rail. Hope this answers your question. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-06 08:00 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Many thanks - at first glance it seemed like a tagging mistake. | ||
| 4739415 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-02 20:47 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | New building here? | |
| 2 | 2025-09-06 22:35 | closed | Locator ♦189 | Yes. Surveyed recently. | ||
| 4739264 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-02 18:15 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Sign for Hinoki Retreat https://www.hinokiretreat.co.uk/ But nothing yet on imagery to map | |
| 3391467 | 1 | 2022-10-08 21:22 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | This bridleway doesn't look right. There seems to be a cycle crossing significantly further away from roundabout. | |
| 2 | 2025-05-01 19:26 | commented | HubertusO ♦32 | I have to check it, but probably It doesn't exist. Google Street View shows a barrier from City Way side. | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-02 08:14 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Yes, the whole "network of bridleways" doesn't look right to me. If these are "multi user paths", I would be tempted to tag as cycleways (with horse=yes if allowed / actually a bridleway) if a "paved" surface or paths (with relevant access tags) if a non-sealed surface. | ||
| 4361794 | 1 | 2024-08-01 13:02 | opened | 2tefan ♦120 | Missing gravel tracks via StreetComplete_ee 58.2 | |
| 2 | 2025-04-29 20:48 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Added | ||
| 2292468 | 1 | 2020-08-03 20:44 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Two N/S strava traces here - not clear which is FP. | |
| 2 | 2025-04-24 17:16 | closed | Blarghera ♦0 | Right-Right,Left-Left. Easy. | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-25 08:37 | reopened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | |||
| 4 | 2025-04-25 08:37 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | I don't know what this comment means! | ||
| 4703846 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-04-10 09:41 | opened | Jackalus ♦8 | "Bridge now removed. May not be replaced." OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: Leazes footbridge POI types: hwtag-nobicycle hwtag-nofoot hwtag-private highway-cycleway-bridge #organicmaps android | |
| 2 | 2025-04-19 17:08 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Good point. Bridge removed. Leave note as reminder that replacement pedestrian crossings need to be added. | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-20 00:34 | closed | Jackalus ♦8 | It is removed at closest zoom scale but remains, along with blue dotted footpath, at so all wider zooms. | ||
| 4 | 2025-04-20 00:34 | reopened | Jackalus ♦8 | |||
| 5 | 2025-04-23 09:20 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Some map renders take longer than other to update. The "Standard" display updates quickly, but you may need to clear your browser cache. | ||
| 3449934 | 1 | 2022-11-20 22:19 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Plaque somewhere about here http://openplaques.org/plaques/11018 | |
| 2 | 2025-04-21 17:53 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Added | ||
| 4714277 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-17 09:52 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | This grit bin looks misplaced. Multiple grit bins in Sheffield are in odd places - dubious data import? | |
| 2 | 2025-04-28 09:16 | commented | ntzm ♦272 | I think someone did an import of Sheffield's Open data: https://sheffield-city-council-open-data-sheffieldcc.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/9d3d2d8b017749508ecbec2ff704d329_26/explore?location=0.000480%2C-0.000014%2C18.25 I think it used to be here but has since been moved | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-28 09:17 | commented | ntzm ♦272 | I have moved it to the correct location | ||
| 4 | 2025-06-23 17:05 | closed | ntzm ♦272 | |||
| 4713425 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-16 15:11 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | These traffic lights on a cycleway, unconnected to roads, look strange | |
| 2 | 2025-05-01 14:03 | closed | ntzm ♦272 | It is how it should be done according to the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Traffic_signals_for_cyclists. | ||
| 3787286 | 1 | 2023-07-18 20:09 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Is this all a cycleway? | |
| 2 | 2025-04-09 19:38 | commented | Infinatum ♦148 | Hi Phodgkin. Yep, there are signs along this route showing it's a shared use cycle lane. Only interesting thing is that some of the signs say its part of cycle route 14. Not sure how this connects to the current route though. | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-10 08:00 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Thanks. I'll close the note. I can't remember now what prompted the query. | ||
| 4695985 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-04 17:04 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | These 3 bus stops look mispositioned | |
| 2 | 2025-08-09 12:59 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦867 | surveyed and fixed | ||
| 4343167 | 1 | 2024-07-21 10:43 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | Determine access of road/car park | |
| 2 | 2025-04-03 18:02 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | More detail added | ||
| 4384011 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-08-14 21:36 | opened | Nathan_A_RF ♦904 | A few duplicated shops inside airport terminal. Needs checking. via StreetComplete 58.2 | |
| 2 | 2025-04-03 17:31 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Checked. One duplicate, but most are separate landside vs airside. | ||
| 2669638 | 1 | 2021-05-15 12:48 | opened | confusedbuffalo ♦16,975 | Check name, FHRS lists this as "Dhillons Golden Fry" | |
| 2 | 2022-09-18 06:00 | closed | TonesG | |||
| 3 | 2022-09-19 06:58 | reopened | confusedbuffalo ♦16,975 | |||
| 4 | 2022-09-19 06:58 | commented | confusedbuffalo ♦16,975 | Please don't resolve public notes without edits having been made | ||
| 5 | 2025-03-28 12:41 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Previously changed? The website uses this name. | ||
| 4225141 | 1 | 2024-05-01 18:28 | opened | scuzzmonkey ♦30 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – St Johns Church (Christian Church) – https://osm.org/way/440319840 via StreetComplete 57.3: Unsure, this may now be a house. | |
| 2 | 2025-03-28 09:59 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | This is a mistake. St. John's Church is already mapped on Church Road to the south. Removed incorrect tagging. | ||
| 4683889 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-26 21:53 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Seems unlikely that speed limit is 30 mph in this residential zone | |
| 2 | 2025-03-29 14:02 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦867 | It's not, it's all one big 20mph zone. Updated | ||
| 2435696 | 1 | 2020-11-21 22:07 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Adit here? https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/1395686 | |
| 2 | 2025-03-26 14:38 | commented | jambamkin ♦1,603 | Yep Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/267628.jpg | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-26 15:43 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Added! | ||
| 4580765 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-07 20:34 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Is South Pier really a service way? Seemed to be several bollards / obstacles to prevent vehicle traffic | |
| 2 | 2025-03-22 19:10 | commented | Infinatum ♦148 | I believe that authorized vehicles can access the pier. I few months back a crane and lorry went along the pier to install the new Lighthouse Dome (see BBC article below) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqjr9ylz75qo I believe they are removable Bollards or gates stopping unauthorized vehicle access (not sure about the exact location though) | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-24 09:12 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Sounds like a good option might be `vehicle=private` on the full length? | ||
| 4 | 2025-03-24 11:33 | commented | Infinatum ♦148 | Yeah, sounds good. Believe there is also a barrier / bollard on that service road South of the Watch House. (just next to this note) Might need a survey to see where the bollards are. | ||
| 5 | 2025-03-24 18:52 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | |||
| 2370736 | 1 | 2020-10-01 20:58 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Middle Rainton Picnic Area map implies path parallel to road here | |
| 2 | 2025-03-17 21:58 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | There's this added 2 years after your note, which is outside the woodland area so might be different? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105038550/history | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-19 17:16 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | I suspect so. The added path is the sidewalk. The path shown in the council map is probably within the area: https://www.durham.gov.uk/media/3899/Middle-Rainton-picnic-area/pdf/MiddleRaintonPicnicArea.pdf | ||
| 3044812 | 1 | 2022-02-09 22:07 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Historic milestone about here? https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/5624065 | |
| 2 | 2025-03-18 19:07 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | Good match? Exactly where the note is, facing south east https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=54.614257%7E-1.747569&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&pi=0.9&style=x&dir=224.7 | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-19 17:11 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Good spot - added! | ||
| 4571747 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-01 15:11 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Now a new service station? | |
| 2 | 2025-03-16 18:08 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Confirmed | ||
| 3799259 | 1 | 2023-07-25 21:25 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | The box. What is this and is it exstant? | |
| 2 | 2025-03-13 01:13 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | referring to this? https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/24169132.renovation-northern-echo-building-darlington-receives-11-4m/ TLDR is the council bought & renovated (still renovating?) this building, which used to be Northern Echo offices | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-13 16:50 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | The news article looks to be about refurbishing upper floors. There is (was) signage on the ground floor for "The Box", but the only web references are from 2011: https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/9391871.pam-royle-opens-darlington-media-hub-c-box-northern-echo-offices/ I suspect it is defunct, but was hoping a local might know more. | ||
| 3357612 | 1 | 2022-09-13 08:14 | opened | --- | been here and it was a great opportunity | |
| 2 | 2025-03-10 21:19 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Nothing to map | ||
| 3587627 | 1 | 2023-03-06 21:03 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Sustrans mapping shows NCN 1 along here | |
| 2 | 2025-03-04 21:41 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | NCN 1 re-routed | ||
| 3587624 | 1 | 2023-03-06 21:03 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Sustrans mapping shows cycle route along here | |
| 2 | 2025-03-04 01:12 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | since tagged as a bridleway, is it a named route that should have a relation? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1022700076/history | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-04 19:07 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Fixed. NCN has been re-routed here | ||
| 2773678 | 1 | 2021-07-27 19:19 | opened | --- | NCN1 has diverted and new route needs mapping | |
| 2 | 2022-01-19 21:18 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Partially remapped with Maxar/Strava imagery but needs ground survey to confirm new routing of NCN1 | ||
| 3 | 2022-01-19 21:18 | reopened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | |||
| 4 | 2025-03-04 19:06 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Done | ||
| 3434947 | 1 | 2022-11-09 22:24 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Missing or misplaced bus stop? | |
| 2 | 2025-03-04 01:04 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | this one has since been added here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12095613089 and this one modified https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/502595289 | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-04 09:02 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Thanks! Let's close this. | ||
| 2774509 | 1 | 2021-07-28 08:42 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Adit here? | |
| 2 | 2025-03-04 00:00 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | Would you mind explaining what is meant by this? would be helpful if using streetcomplete with no signal to look up what it means (and even with signal the images are a bit confusing) | ||
| 3 | 2025-03-04 09:01 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | I can't recall the exact prompt, whether it was an adit marked here on a historic map or whether it was from visual indications (was walking across the valley past Sleigill house). The stream could easily come from an abandoned adit, so would be a logical feature to add if it can be observed. | ||
| 4571845 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-01-01 16:15 | opened | ThePeeinator ♦4 | Unable to answer "Where is this defibrillator located?" – outside: Defibrillator – https://osm.org/node/7460501412 via StreetComplete 60.0: Don't think it's functional/usable Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/255935.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-25 21:31 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Tagged as disused - doesn't appear in The Circuit database. | ||
| 2471329 | 1 | 2020-12-23 21:29 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Note clear what happens to FP here | |
| 2 | 2025-02-19 22:04 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Resolved from Strava heatmap | ||
| 1957836 | 1 | 2019-10-11 18:27 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Steps here? | |
| 2 | 2025-02-11 21:56 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Added | ||
| 1959459 | 1 | 2019-10-12 20:20 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Needs more careful survey of routes here. Some steps? | |
| 2 | 2025-02-11 21:06 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Improved from survey | ||
| 1960594 | 1 | 2019-10-13 18:33 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Check cycle access on bridge. Gateshead cycle map indicates cycle route | |
| 2 | 2025-02-07 18:22 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Seems to be fixed | ||
| 4614207 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-04 21:11 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Strava intensity is to E of wall. FP diverted? | |
| 4527056 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-20 16:20 | opened | ntzm ♦272 | Is this a cafe or a bar? | |
| 2 | 2025-02-03 18:20 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Cafe rather than bar. Fixed | ||
| 4608162 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-30 22:12 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Two Locoespressos? [May be separate units on Plaforms 1 and 2] | |
| 2 | 2025-12-02 21:29 | commented | eteb3 ♦1,014 | Yea the one on P2 is operational and the one on P3 has closed. I deleted the P3 one a few days ago | ||
| 3 | 2025-12-04 12:21 | commented | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,755 | Where is platform 2? | ||
| 4 | 2025-12-04 12:22 | commented | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,755 | Sorry, I mean where is the Locoespresso on platform 2? | ||
| 5 | 2025-12-04 12:52 | commented | eteb3 ♦1,014 | My mistake, I meant P3 closed, and P*1* is operational | ||
| 6 | 2025-12-04 13:04 | closed | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,755 | Ah, ok. Thanks. I'll resolve this note. | ||
| 3355713 | 1 | 2022-09-11 20:17 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Cadastre gives this path as the track of the Chemin de Plan (supported by stronger Strava heatmap trace) rather than track to north. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-11 14:58 | commented | tbo47 ♦1,951 | c'est toujours d'actualité ? | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-15 19:01 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | I've removed the "Chemin de Plan de l'Aiguille" label, as the route was incomplete anyway, and searching for this name gives varying results. This makes the note redundant. | ||
| 3786962 | 1 | 2023-07-18 18:24 | opened | --- | Road does not connect here. Its private parking spaces separated by planted vegetation | |
| 2 | 2025-01-14 22:08 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Fixed | ||
| 3787129 | 1 | 2023-07-18 18:28 | opened | --- | Actual position of Mowbray Road - Kingsway E/B bus stop | |
| 2 | 2025-01-14 22:02 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Confirmed from Bing imagery | ||
| 3138693 | 1 | 2022-04-17 21:05 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Footways in this area don't seem to match imagery / Strava heatmap | |
| 2 | 2025-01-14 21:20 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Closing note - current mapping is fine | ||
| 4586782 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-12 19:17 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Bowling green looks abandoned? | |
| 2 | 2025-08-10 14:07 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦867 | Saltwell Park still has active bowling clubs so I suspect the greens are still officially bowling greens even if not very well maintained. | ||
| 2516060 | 1 | 2021-01-28 18:47 | opened | --- | Carters Well | |
| 2 | 2025-01-11 18:56 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Mapped (other side of road) | ||
| 4584340 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-10 19:24 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Building site (jan 2025)? | |
| 4584339 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-10 19:24 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Looks odd for this isolated section of public footpath to be a cycleway | |
| 4583310 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-09 22:14 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Looks like a paved surface. Better tagged as cycleway? | |
| 2 | 2025-07-21 17:43 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦867 | agreed. it's a tarmac surface and clearly not primarily a bridleway. plus you'd be mad to try and ride a horse across the dual carrigeway. fixed. | ||
| 4576073 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-04 18:16 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Clarify which sections of Gateshead Highway are closed | |
| 2 | 2025-01-05 17:24 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦867 | It's the whole lot. Map is currently correct. https://www.gateshead.gov.uk/article/30608/Gateshead-Highway-A167-flyover | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-07 18:02 | reopened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | |||
| 4 | 2025-01-07 18:04 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Sorry for re-opening, but isn't the source saying that B1296 between the two roundabouts also closed? | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-17 14:10 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦867 | Quite right. Have now visited in person and verified that the article is right. Map updated. | ||
| 3786936 | 1 | 2023-07-18 18:17 | opened | --- | Bus stop no longer exists. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-06 19:47 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | |||
| 4576074 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-04 18:16 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Two bus stops with same name in close proximity | |
| 2 | 2025-07-26 19:12 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦867 | No sign of the more northern one, and the name seems wrong (not close to the street it references), so removed it. | ||
| 4060953 | 1 | 2024-01-10 14:35 | opened | Evildave3 | Unable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" for https://osm.org/node/795915907 via StreetComplete 56.0: Building has been demolished. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-03 12:22 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Removed! | ||
| 4043476 | 1 | 2023-12-28 10:07 | opened | Evildave3 | Unable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" for https://osm.org/node/4347374191 via StreetComplete 55.1: This building was demolished. | |
| 2 | 2025-01-02 18:30 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Removed | ||
| 4573154 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-02 16:40 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Houses can't all be called Beechcroft. Presumably have numbers | |
| 2 | 2025-01-02 16:40 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | |||
| 4228505 | 1 | 2024-05-04 00:33 | opened | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | Does this pub have a name? | |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 18:56 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Seems to be resolved | ||
| 4571962 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-01 17:55 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Check lanes and speed limit here. Now two lines and 40 mph? | |
| 2 | 2025-04-03 20:40 | closed | Infinatum ♦148 | Changed Speed Limit to 40 MPH (before Fellgate Bus stop) and changed to two lanes on Leam Lane Northbound. Southbound still one Lane at 50 MPH | ||
| 3873746 | 1 | 2023-09-06 08:12 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Isolated "amenity=village_hall" node here. Needs associating with right building and re-tagging | |
| 2 | 2024-12-31 18:06 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Seems to be fixed | ||
| 3604894 | 1 | 2023-03-19 17:09 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Strava intensity implies connection between footway and Auckland path | |
| 2 | 2024-12-30 22:09 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | No connection | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-31 13:00 | reopened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | |||
| 4 | 2024-12-31 13:01 | commented | phodgkin ♦2,333 | From a second look at photos, there looks to be an informal path from track into the woods to S and W of woods. | ||
| 4568012 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-29 13:50 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Parking node on road junction! | |
| 2 | 2025-01-05 17:00 | closed | spiffy mapper ♦867 | It was tagged amenity=parking_entrance - someone trying to be helpful but it's not strictly the entrance, so I've moved it to the actual entrance and added the exits which were both missing. | ||
| 4565705 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-27 18:12 | opened | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Power line buried here? | |
| 4182246 | 1 | 2024-04-04 14:00 | opened | donq1986b ♦64 | Unable to answer "What’s the height limit here?" – underground: Track / Land-Access Road – https://osm.org/way/747041556 via StreetComplete 57.1: Doesn't make sense, reconstructed roman wall | |
| 2 | 2024-12-23 18:19 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | The added maxheight:signed=no does the job. | ||
| 4182258 | 1 | 2024-04-04 14:03 | opened | donq1986b ♦64 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface firmness of this track?" – Track / Land-Access Road – https://osm.org/way/747041557 via StreetComplete 57.1: This doesn't make sense, not a farm track | |
| 2 | 2024-09-09 07:54 | commented | rskedgell ♦2,423 | highway=track does not exclusively imply agricultural use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-23 18:18 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Incorrect note | ||
| 4374939 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2024-08-09 18:15 | opened | mdt6275 ♦10 | Unable to answer "Do these traffic lights have a tactile indication for blind people for when it’s safe to cross?" – Crossing With Pedestrian Signals – https://osm.org/node/449096091 via StreetComplete 58.2: Check for tactile crossing under signal nox | |
| 2 | 2024-12-21 17:07 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Doesn't need a note. Existing StreetComplete task | ||
| 4168956 | 1 | 2024-03-26 17:13 | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦6,755 | Has Rowland's Pharmacy closed here? https://www.loopnet.co.uk/Listing/19-West-Auckland-Rd-Darlington/30538614/ | |
| 2 | 2024-12-21 17:01 | closed | phodgkin ♦2,333 | Confirmed |