| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5253064 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Shadforth Cemetery seems to be distinct from St Cuthbert's graveyard. Demarkation unclear. |
| 5230651 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | --- | 4 4 2026 |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Not clear what this note means. Closing. | |
| 5245960 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Labelling building wings with `office=research` is surely tagging for the renderer? |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | ntzm ♦347 | I agree, how do you think uni faculties should be tagged? | |
| 3 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | I don't think there's a well defined tagging scheme. But Sheffield does seem to have an epidemic of blue dots, with `office=research` being (ab)used to make labels. I really don't think you can start labelling bits of buildings like this. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | ntzm ♦347 | You'll find they were mostly added by one user who always tagged for the renderer. I would be happy to remove these but it does feel like it is kind of useful information. I think tagging "wings" can be deleted, but actual departments and their floors feels like useful information, not necessarily tagged in their current scheme though. | |
| 5 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | I think the building parts labels should be converted to building:part + name. It won't get rendered, but will keep the info. The stuff in () usually belongs in other tags e.g. anonyms, building levels (-> level). | |
| 6 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | "acronyms"! | |
| 5250147 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Open for pedestrians and cycles? |
| 5249100 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Something not right here - footway crosses service way without intersection |
| 3449683 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Construction complete - new businesses need adding |
| 2 | ~ 7 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Done | |
| 5245967 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Acronyms don't really belong in the name tag. alt_name would be better. |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | ntzm ♦347 | Thanks, I've updated this and several others in this area. | |
| 5245962 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Wikidata implies there are two Y&L war memorials here (one for the Boer Wat). Labelling may be incorrect |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | ntzm ♦347 | Thanks, surveyed and updated | |
| 5245961 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Should be historic=milestone here https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q111788499 |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | ntzm ♦347 | Thanks, surveyed and added | |
| 5239600 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Not clear how pedestrian routing would work here. Better for cycleway to be segregated cycleway with ped access? |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | commented | ntzm ♦347 | Thanks for the heads up, I've added separated pavements. The whole area was redesigned recently | |
| 3 | ~ 10 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | That looks much better! | |
| 3433553 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | This bridge looks strange. |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Infinatum ♦180 | Seems to be a bridge over the underpass. However the bridge and underpass seems to be closed during the demolition of bridge house. Unsure if this will ever reopen. changed tags to 'access=no' | |
| 3 | ~ 10 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Thanks! I'll close the note. | |
| 5239626 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Doesn't look like a grave yard? |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | closed | Islerman ♦4 | ||
| 5239499 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Area is a bit confusing. Two objects, one a restaurant, one a hotel. One a building, one a building:part. Separate building and two nodes within? |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | commented | ntzm ♦347 | For context, the ground floor is a miller and carter steakhouse, upper floors are a hotel. | |
| 3 | ~ 13 hours ago | closed | TheUKHighStreet ♦7,771 | I think this has been fixed - the building is now tagged separately to the restaurant and hotel. | |
| 2979710 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Now closed? [No current FHRS data] |
| 2 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Seems to be fixed. | |
| 3992440 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Does cycleway continue? |
| 2 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Looks to be fixed. | |
| 5223351 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 22 days ago | opened | AJZED | Start of private drive to house |
| 2 | ~ 14 days ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | The access tagging on this lane/drive looks completely wrong. I presume the drive up to the residential area is a public footpath and the footway leading S/SE is also a public FP? Assuming it is otherwise a private road and no other permission is granted (horse / bicycle etc.) then correct tagging would be access=private + foot=yes (on the public FP section) It's also a good idea to add designation=public_footpath on the sections that are public FPs. The track heading NE is also tagged with "access=permissive", which seems unlikely. | |
| 5177202 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | xeonlto7 ♦20 | Wheelchair ramp here via StreetComplete 62.2 |
| 2 | ~ 14 days ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | I think the map data is fine here. You separately map the steps and ramp, but this detail may be more confusing than thelpful. | |
| 5177201 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | xeonlto7 ♦20 | No ramp here for wheelchair via StreetComplete 62.2 |
| 2 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Already added | |
| 3738687 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | New building - wait for imagery |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | closed | paceban351 | All paid! | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | reopened | confusedbuffalo ♦16,771 | Erroneously marked as resolved. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/paceban351/blocks | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | confusedbuffalo ♦16,771 | Erroneously marked as resolved. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/paceban351/blocks | |
| 5 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Added | |
| 4777864 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | Jackalus ♦11 | "Remove 'Food Cooperative' from name" OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: Abundant Earth Food Co-operative POI types: landuse-allotments #organicmaps android |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | Jackalus ♦11 | Rather, just remove 'Food' from name; leave 'Cooperative' as part of name. | |
| 3 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Done | |
| 5001169 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | Jackalus ♦11 | ""DL16" postcode search incorrectly returns this place. DL16 is Spennymoor." OSM snapshot date: 2025-09-13T21:01:41Z POI has no name POI types: landuse-farmland #organicmaps android 2025.10.05-7-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | There's nothing in the data that can change this - it will be a geocoding issue. | |
| 5204765 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Jackalus ♦11 | "ERROR. This is not Durham Road; it is Broom Lane. Durham Road is the name of the row of houses (1-30) to the north of Broom Lane and of the road that loops around the back of them. Google Maps has it right. Also, confirm by visiting the website of any of the businesses that list themselves on Broom Lane, for example, https://www.coop.co.uk/store-finder/DH7-7LQ/broom-lane" OSM snapshot date: 2025-12-27T02:09:53Z POI name: Durham Road POI types: psurface-paved_good highway-secondary #CoMaps android 2026.02.23-9-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Agreed. I suspect it is a bit of both i.e. it is/was also called Durham Road, e.g. the service road behind is is listed "Durham Road (rear)". But Council Adopted Highways data gives Broom Lane. Changed. | |
| 5232626 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Strong Strava trace here. Clarify position with respect to tree line |
| 5230273 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Strong Strava trace along old railway route. De facto footway? |
| 5230274 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Clarify status of the "Chareway". Definitive Map and OS shows this as FP (not bridleway) and route differs here (FP heads straight on). |
| 4379488 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Dannie44 | This crossing has been realigned to cross the track at right angles. Its skewed presentation on the map is incorrect. The same applies to Bells Crossing a little further along the track (end of Burn Lane). |
| 2 | ~ 18 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | This looks to have been fixed. | |
| 5222206 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 23 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | The fences here seem to have gone. Perhaps these narrow field strips were temporary, or perhaps seasonal? |
| 2 | ~ 23 days ago | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,766 | Quite possibly. Perhaps mark them as demolished using a lifecycle prefix, to make it clear that they were removed after the aerial imagery was most recently updated? | |
| 3 | ~ 18 days ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | I've done this for the upper fields, as I didn't see the fences when passing. It's not 100% clear from the imagery whether the fences in the "lower fields" have gone. | |
| 4 | ~ 18 days ago | closed | gurglypipe ♦1,766 | Thanks. We can probably resolve this now? | |
| 3622331 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Historic milestone about here? |
| 2 | ~ 24 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Confirmed | |
| 4927030 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦7,771 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435839884 Is this Grange Pharmacy? |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,766 | As in, is this no longer branded as Well Pharmacy and is instead operating independently? aiui Well sold off a load of branches in March 2025, so presumably that’s what you’re trying to check? https://grangecommunitypharmacy.com/about-us/ suggests that it’s still the same pharmacy operating from the same premises, just under different branding. Some of the older Google Reviews on the page call it ‘Well’. So yes, this probably should now be labelled as ‘Grange Pharmacy’, but I haven’t visited Grange in a little while so can’t confirm with a survey right now. Feel free to go ahead and change it anyway, I think there’s enough supporting evidence from the website. | |
| 3 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Confirmed and fixed. | |
| 4052911 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | --- | "This is an open plot of land, but a water run off catchment area, definitely not a park. " The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2023-12-13T18:30:01Z POI name: Prudhoe Park POI types: leisure-park #organicmaps ios |
| 2 | ~ 26 days ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Since resolved | |
| 5217251 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 27 days ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Check correct. Looks like wall here |
| 5211396 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Check routing of footpath on ground - doesn't look likely |
| 5206478 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Service station has been demolished (Mar 2025) and is being rebuilt |
| 2811251 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | CjMalone ♦3,733 | #surveyme Is this still Greggs? has something replaced it? |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Location updated | |
| 2026340 | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Clarify paths and barriers here |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Improved | |
| 3748087 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦7,771 | All M&Co stores have closed. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Confirmed | |
| 4404292 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Now demolished and relocated to leisure centre? |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Yes | |
| 5195971 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Add node for library at suitable position |
| 5151107 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Is this geometry correct? Doesn't match imagery |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | James Derrick ♦998 | Hi, Give both ESRI and Bing show a diagonal, I'd go for the edit. (Strava high-res seems to have gone HTTP 400, sadly.) Happy Mapping, James | |
| 4703846 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Jackalus ♦11 | "Bridge now removed. May not be replaced." OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: Leazes footbridge POI types: hwtag-nobicycle hwtag-nofoot hwtag-private highway-cycleway-bridge #organicmaps android |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Good point. Bridge removed. Leave note as reminder that replacement pedestrian crossings need to be added. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | closed | Jackalus ♦11 | It is removed at closest zoom scale but remains, along with blue dotted footpath, at so all wider zooms. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | reopened | Jackalus ♦11 | ||
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Some map renders take longer than other to update. The "Standard" display updates quickly, but you may need to clear your browser cache. | |
| 6 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Updated | |
| 4806963 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Area doesn't match current imagery. Needs survey |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Updated | |
| 4781162 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Confirm demolished |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | CjMalone ♦3,733 | Probably Aldi now https://www.aldi.co.uk/store-finder/l/baillieston/11-boghall-road/c742 | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | But presumably not the one in Glasgow? | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | CjMalone ♦3,733 | (I don't like the new website! Too much JavaScript) https://www.aldi.co.uk/store-finder/l/durham/mill-road/c994 | |
| 5134516 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Coffee at No. 10 has moved to Arcade? |
| 4862688 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Yeomanry Survey ♦164 | This Booths branch is to become a Tesco |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Locator ♦189 | Booths has closed. Building being converted to Tesco. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Updated. | |
| 4315879 | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦7,771 | Is this Asda Express? https://storelocator.asda.com/yorkshire-&-humber/richmond/middleton-tyas-a1 |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Confirmed and fixed. | |
| 5128272 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Check routing of Coxhoe Heritage 100 walk in this area - paths confusing! |
| 5128271 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Is this path passable? No Strava trace. Looks very overgrown |
| 2320410 | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Should be footbridge here |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | confirmed | |
| 1949806 | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Looks more like a track going up to Burton Beck Farm than a footway |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Resolved from imagery | |
| 1949808 | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Burton Beck in culvert? |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Resolved from imagery | |
| 5119060 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Better described as cycleway? motor vehicle traffic seems to be prohibited |
| 5119037 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | toilets? in use? |
| 3508692 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | NAPTAN data suggests additional bus stop |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Located | |
| 5113650 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Clarify status of this grassy area. Meadow, recreation ground? |
| 5113649 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Check status of this nursery. Beech Tree nursery? |
| 2320409 | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Confirm whether private road to church does connect |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | MuloMulo ♦18 | It does connect, but is definitely private, no right of way -- I've been turned away on 28/5/23 | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Interesting (and disappointing). The access road to the church must be public, but there are no rights of way otherwise in the grounds. There are marked trails in the grounds: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/ But perhaps this permissive access has been withdrawn by new owners? [Leave open until current trail routes confirmed] | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Confirmed. Have changed the access to indicate that permissive access seems to have been withdrawn. Left routes as-is until updated. | |
| 3731228 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Imagery suggests better tagged as service alley for Kendal Close? |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Confirmed | |
| 5087674 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Does footway connect with car park? Way of Learning route is currently broken at this point |
| 5087673 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Bit of a mess here. Has bridleway been altered to leave road further N? |
| 4801315 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦37,852 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/269919868/history Is it gate or stile? Is there really a stile here? If yes, then barrier=stile is missing. If no then stile= for stile subtype makes little sense. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:barrier=stile#Stile_types http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1c3g finds about 300 other similar issues |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | RebeccaParris | There is neither a gate nor a stile | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦37,852 | ||
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦37,852 | then stile=squeezer should be removed, right? | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Fixed. | |
| 3839626 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Does this cross path exist? No trace on imagery |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Looks to have gone | |
| 4199912 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | --- | Bishop Auckland Retail and Leisure Park has been built on this Site. Currently Popeye's, Greggs, Pure Gym and Home Bargins are open or will open within the next month. More businesses to follow. |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Robert Whittaker ♦1,683 | I've mapped the roads and buildings in the first phase from Esri World Imagery. Now needs someone local to do a survey to map the occupants. #surveyme | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Looks pretty much done! | |
| 3453821 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | SDAVD | Is it definitely 60mph here? Feels like a 30 with the streetlights, and the NSL signs prior to the A1M roundabout. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | There were no signs indicating a lower limit, but signage is definitely odd, with nothing on reverse of NSL sign. Suspect lighting is for cycles/pedestrians. Didn't otherwise feel like 30 mph zone. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | I've re-driven over this section and it is clearly 60+. S section is divided highway, so I suspect that the one-side NSL signs are saying "definitely 60 mph from here". | |
| 5022903 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Does this "Conservation Walk" still exist? Either way, should be converted to route relation. |
| 5022771 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | This permissive footpath looks unlikely- straight through buildings |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | Mex ♦7,743 | moved to be more in line with PROW layer and added buildings | |
| 3337442 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | New leisure centre building? |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Mex ♦7,743 | already mapped? | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | I mapped the building (based on imagery), but it wasn't clear whether it was an extension of the existing centre / replacement of something new. | |
| 4957577 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Imagery suggests this is not lanes=2. no lane markings? |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | James Derrick ♦998 | Hi, I'd suggest as it's still wide enough for passing: lanes=2 lane_markings=no https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:lanes=2 | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Agreed! | |
| 5002337 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Area has been redeveloped - wait for imagery to catch up |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | spiffy mapper ♦905 | ESRI has much more recent imagery, but not really sure what I'm looking for. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Infinatum ♦180 | Seems to now be a Dinosaur Themed Crazy Golf Course I believe its called Dinosaur Cove. Its on both sided of the footpath to the amusement arcade. and it looks like you can see it on Esri World Imagery. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Infinatum ♦180 | Added Miniature Golf as seen on Esri World Imagery. Assume the building is the Jurassic Grill | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Infinatum ♦180 | Added Site | |
| 4997972 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Has this information centre closed? |
| 4997947 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Isn't this Flodden Lodge? |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | swefre | ||
| 3825586 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Matyjace | Forwarding anonymous report from #Mapy.cz user, please verify: "closed" |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Confirmed. | |
| 3899205 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | --- | Breakout Cafe within Currie RFC building. |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Added | |
| 4854834 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦7,771 | Is this Jozef's Restaurant & Bar Durham? https://www.radissonhotels.com/en-us/hotels/radisson-blu-durham/dining/jozefs |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Yes - must be a re-brand | |
| 4878265 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | Jason67 ♦77 | "Kapazität: 8" OSM snapshot date: 2025-07-08T15:45:36Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-bicycle_parking #organicmaps ios |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Not expecting a name for bicycle parking. Should capacity=8 be added? | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | Jason67 ♦77 | yes | |
| 3863722 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Peter Newman ♦2,902 | Home bargains opening Nov via StreetComplete 53.3 |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | closed | paceban351 | All paid! | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | reopened | Peter Newman ♦2,902 | ||
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Added | |
| 4978676 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | --- | Durham Unit |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | This needs more information! | |
| 4981094 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | avantman42 ♦209 | Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – Grass – https://osm.org/way/566363973 via StreetComplete 61.3: Check tagging. StreetComplete says it's a vacant shop, but it's a grassy area |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | It was tagged as disused:amenity=school (relating to former Gilesgate Sixth Form Centre). Changed this to "was:amenity=school" which should stop the SC questions. | |
| 4986654 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Blakehope Burn continues |
| 4983379 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Road seems to be an unclassified highway formally, but looks unsurfaced? |
| 2253900 | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | opened | CjMalone ♦3,733 | Post office may have moved west to Ewesley Road. Please survey. pol_branch_list_2020‑02‑20 |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Moved in 2023? | |
| 4981888 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | If chapel is derelict, it can't be a place of worship? |
| 758921 | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | opened | --- | Bishopwearmouth Horticultural Nursery |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Garden centre now mapped | |
| 4981803 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Bus stops misplaced in this area |
| 3720991 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | awilliamsonuk | Chester Gate homes should be built now |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | They are yet to appear on the freely available imagery mappers can work from. But a ground survey would be useful to sort out the roads. | |
| 2378251 | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Should be path on left leading up to walkway |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | HubertusO ♦32 | Rhetorically not, practically yes | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | If it's a useful / usable path, I would add it with something like "surface=dirt" (?) and "informal=yes". If it's an unsafe, hairy scramble, then probably not. | |
| 4119552 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Dannie44 | Unable to answer "What kind of building is this?" – Albert Edward Club – https://osm.org/way/557377840 via StreetComplete 56.1: Private Members Club. Don't know appropriate use category |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Fixed | |
| 3747150 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | swise ♦57 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" for https://osm.org/way/132789404 via StreetComplete 53.1: Stairs and bridge both in grippy grit surface, will search for correct term Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/156557.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | I tend to use surface=chipseal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dchipseal for this kind of thing - grit pressed into a surface. | |
| 2700956 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | Jack Donnelly | This should denote the athletics complex attached to the Wentworth Leisure Centre, including their track and field facilities. Currently, you cannot determine who this feature belongs to and the function it serves, (as part of the Wentworth Leisure Centre). There should be a basic identification of the 8 lane track, the multi-purpose sports field, which is adapted for field events in athletics as well as competitive football matches. Furthermore, there should be an indication of the use of these facilities for international sporting events as well as local events and the fact that this facility plays home to Tynedale Athletics Club. This could be depicted using a photograph, highlighting it's link to the local community and it's athletes. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | commented | jambamkin ♦1,649 | Hi Jack, Not sure what you mean here. The running track and sports field are both on the map. I can only count 6 lanes on the track from aerial photography. Photographs can be linked to the map database, but these would usually be of the mapped object and not of a related club. James | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Clarified area of leisure centre. It would make sense to break up the awkward multipolygon which encompasses the track, but also other features. This makes it hard to see what is present. | |
| 4973835 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Does this farm shop / cafe still exist? |
| 4969466 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Sign here stated "private road", so motor_vehicle=yes seems wrong. customers perhaps? |
| 4969465 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | cycleway=opposite_lane doesn't make sense here (2 way street) |
| 4969287 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Now 30 mph? |
| 4969288 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | 50 mph rather than 60? |
| 4966613 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Now 40 mph rather than 50? |
| 4793210 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | There are several stops along Pond Street. Would be useful to map them. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | CanopyFalls ♦521 | Where are the stops and how many? Are they to the north of the note's location? Would be great to get a survey of them with photos of all the signs and locations. Create a note for each one and place it as close to the location of the stop and I'll go in and add them all if you give me a message. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | I only noted in passing that the bus stops in OSM didn't match reality. I would map if local! | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | CanopyFalls ♦521 | TYSM for the reply! #surveyme Confirm locations of bus stops on the West side of Pond Street. (Reminder for me to check them when I'm next over here.) | |
| 5 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | CanopyFalls ♦521 | Added notes about locations of bus stops. | |
| 4614208 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Does this long address interpolation way with occasional numbers on it serve a useful purpose? |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | CanopyFalls ♦521 | It allows routing engines to guess the location of addresses that nobody has been able to fix to a building in survey yet. Could absolutely do with a survey. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | But I just don't think it is accurate / meaningful. It can only have been added from historical mapping since the section from 1-127 goes through a redeveloped area. There are plenty of accurately numbered properties along Ecclesall Road. The shorter interpolations are fine, but this long one seems to make things worse. | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | CanopyFalls ♦521 | Hadn't noticed quite how well mapped this road was, after checking it over you're absolutely right, that's just gonna be getting in the way and is basically junk data now. Have deleted and will make a note to survey along here when I get the chance to fill in any missing addressed. | |
| 4962295 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Area has been extensively redeveloped. Wait for imagery to catch up |
| 4161267 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Doesn't look like a service road |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Retagged as abandoned. | |
| 4957576 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Speed restriction on this tertiary road? |
| 4954894 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | There are two Cleadon Park Post Offices in this area. It looks like neither is operational? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | spiffy mapper ♦905 | Agree both gone, confirmed from multiple sources. The eastern one was inside a newsagent which has gone. Updated | |
| 4952835 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Building has been replaced with new Diagnostics Centre. Wait for imagery to catch up |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | spiffy mapper ♦905 | added from ESRI imagery | |
| 3826178 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Robert Whittaker ♦1,683 | Are there more individual shops to be mapped here? #surveyme |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Pretty well mapped now | |
| 4567856 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | avantman42 ♦209 | Unable to answer "Do these steps have a handrail?" – Steps – https://osm.org/way/150854466 via StreetComplete 60.0: Not steps |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Fixed | |
| 3196536 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Former Field House opencast mine. Now being restored (Spring 2022). Wait for imagery to catch up. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | HubertusO ♦32 | I've seen it on Google satellite view, and It looks for agriculture fields. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Thanks! Updated from ESRI imagery (which we can use). | |
| 4855025 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦7,771 | Is this The Seaglass Cafe Bar & Kitchen? https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/1791505 |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Featherbed Cafe, but yes. | |
| 3487110 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | NLS historic OS mapping shows railway crossing burn here (NPE clearly shows a line continuing on S bank). |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Railway did cross | |
| 434005 | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | opened | LivingWithDragons ♦1,033 | There were distinct paths here. Needs surveying on foot (not a bicycle). |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | closed | paceban351 | All paid! | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | reopened | confusedbuffalo ♦16,771 | Erroneously marked as resolved. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/paceban351/blocks | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | confusedbuffalo ♦16,771 | Erroneously marked as resolved. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/paceban351/blocks | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Very overgrown now - not visible on ground | |
| 4892514 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Still a traffic light controlled junction? Doesn't seem to match current imagery |
| 4413664 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Check logic of cycleways here. Council cycling map suggests path through park is a cycleway |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Resolved from survey | |
| 4889055 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Clarify if still part of cycle routes now fully oneway |
| 2091268 | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | S&D railway marker about here? |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,766 | Can only see these two stone blocks with some threads in them Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/293471.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/293472.jpg | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Some of these markers may have gone, but the geograph image looks reasonably current: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Old_Boundary_Marker_by_disused_railway_bed,_Stanhope_Parish_(geograph_6045574).jpg These blocks are original sleepers from the Stockton and Darlington, so closely related! | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,766 | That geograph image is tagged 200m further south than this note, just south of where the power lines cross the road. So that could explain why I couldn’t find anything! I’ll leave the note open in case someone else can take a look. I did some reading and it seems this was a cable-pulled railway incline with a stationary engine at the top. I assume the threaded stone blocks were for cable guides then — they’re all aligned centrally in the track bed, and there aren’t anywhere near enough of them to act as sleepers. | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | That's interesting. There are two wikidata items (corresponding to 2 listed structures) close together: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q26568075 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q26568076 I suspect the photo has been attached to the wrong one (and the northerly one is missing) or there are duplicates in the database. | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,766 | I’m not sure if I’ll get a chance to go there and resurvey. From my trip along the Frosterley Cut today, there are plenty more markers up there. From some reading about the railway, these seem to be boundary markers rather than (as I’d assumed) milestones. The railway land was leased, rather than purchased, so they might be to mark the extent of the leased area. There are loads of them near the Frosterley Cut, on both sides of the railway corridor. | |
| 4878877 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Short section of service road doesn't make sense. Presumably Church Lane is a private service road which has the designation of a public bridleway? |
| 4855460 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Area has changed. Wait for imagery to catch up |
| 3680600 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Car park is a bit of a mess |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Improved but fundamentally tricky because roadways on two levels | |
| 4851181 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | This doesn't look right. On the ground could only see the driveway to Brundholme. Is there really a separate cycleway? There was no signage indicated designated cycle access and no indication of a PRoW on OS maps. |
| 4851157 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Path was marked as washed away in 2016, but looks to have reinstated (at least up to point surveyed). Supported by Strava heatmap. Access is unclear - OS marks short section as "permissive", but no signs evident. |
| 4851138 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | There's a strong Strava trace here correponding to a way that has been tagged as a disused footway. This is clearly not correct, even if it should be access=private. |
| 4850582 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Unlikely that there are two Keswick Park Hotels? |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | lakedistrict ♦1,344 | There's not - this one is Mickledore House holiday let. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176688616 | |
| 4845367 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Is this really a 30 mph stretch? |
| 4843496 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | The paths here don't look right |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Ronnyz112 | ||
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | reopened | Ronnyz112 | ||
| 4837791 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Area is denoted as a leisure=park but also mostly overlapped by a grassland area. Which is better tagging? [Presence of sheep grazing in imagery suggests this is not a municipal park!] |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,766 | leisure=park seems reasonable. It’s National Trust land, but aiui is accessible all the time and is used for bigger events (like Keswick Mountain Festival). Grazing might be seasonal. See https://www.keswick.org/what-to-do/parksinkeswick | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | The website description sounds more like a recreation ground? [It's rather different to Hope Park next door]. Either way, the area should be one thing rather than two overlapped features. | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | gurglypipe ♦1,766 | Sure, that would also work. Get rid of the landuse=grass and retag the existing park as landuse=recreation_ground surface=grass operator=National Trust and maybe a note about how it’s occasionally grazed? | |
| 5 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Done! | |
| 4838726 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Clarify current use of this centre. website link is defunct. Seems to be distinct from other Hawse End Centre to S (different postcode). |
| 4838657 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Some of the paths and streams in this area look odd. Shold this stream be Withe Sike, which has a very different route in OpenData StreetView? |
| 4336277 | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Should this field be part of the Coniston Hall campsite? It certainly looks from imagery to be a campsite. |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | Simon Kellett ♦22 | Yes/no - normally it's sheep grazing, but I think it's a summer only (or summer school holidays only) overflow (not sure of dates etc) | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | That's very useful feedback. I've tagged it with `landuse=meadow` (but without `meadow=pasture`) with a note that it is used as an overflow. That should capture the idea. | |
| 4807358 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Is there still a spa and separate sports centre? website only refers to a "fitness suite" |
| 4649799 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | user_1344 ♦222 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Broadgates (Foot Path) – https://osm.org/way/1162241586 via StreetComplete 60.1: How to define this? See image Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/263682.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | surface=paving_stones makes most sense (since mapped as footway). Updated | |
| 4649800 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | user_1344 ♦222 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Broadgates (Foot Path) – https://osm.org/way/26730666 via StreetComplete 60.1: Stone slabs not concrete slabs... Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/263683.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Updated surface | |
| 4649811 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | user_1344 ♦222 | Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – house name Blagraves: House – https://osm.org/way/1033636609 via StreetComplete 60.1: See the images Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/263684.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/263685.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Consistent with current mapping | |
| 4794344 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | DCC Adopted Highways data shows this as Queen Street |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | spiffy mapper ♦905 | yes, it's Queen St south of here. fixed | |
| 4637212 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Strava trace shows significant detour here |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | resolved from survey | |
| 4649746 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Expert Fire Solutions |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Confirmed and added | |
| 3584608 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Check whether NCN 165 has been re-routed through Winston |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | No evidence it has. Closing note. | |
| 4415245 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | user_1344 ♦222 | Kissing gate via StreetComplete 58.1 |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Added | |
| 4415246 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | user_1344 ♦222 | Sewage farm via StreetComplete 58.1 |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Already tagged as waste water plant | |
| 4782525 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | New buildings on this site - wait for imagery to update |
| 3584609 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Check current signage - has NCN 165 been re-routed through Winston? |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Doesn't look like it. Closing note. | |
| 4752291 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Strange isolated sections of cycleway around roudabout. Check local signage |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Gateshead cycling map shows these as footways (possibly bicycle=dismount?). Consistent with lack of signage. | |
| 2354083 | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Strava trace puts path / footway inside scrub area rather than field edge |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Mapping seems to have moved on. | |
| 4573153 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Gap in shared cycleway here? |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Clarification: neighbouring footways (bot not this one) are tagged bicycle=yes, which implies a shared cycleway. | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | spiffy mapper ♦905 | this isn't a shared cycleway, there are no signs at all to suggest cycling is allowed here. bicycle=yes removed. | |
| 4138480 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Is there any reason why this stretch of the metro line is railway=rail while the rest of the Metro network is railway=light_rail? |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | Infinatum ♦180 | Noted this a few weeks back, My best guess is that this section of the line is shared with the line to the Prax Jarrow Terminal. The metro line used to be separate, but was changed a few years back, since it used to be a single metro track. (you can see the branch near the Tyne Tunnel / A19). So the track is both freight and Light rail. Hope this answers your question. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Many thanks - at first glance it seemed like a tagging mistake. | |
| 4739415 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | New building here? |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | Locator ♦189 | Yes. Surveyed recently. | |
| 4739264 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Sign for Hinoki Retreat https://www.hinokiretreat.co.uk/ But nothing yet on imagery to map |
| 3391467 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | This bridleway doesn't look right. There seems to be a cycle crossing significantly further away from roundabout. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | HubertusO ♦32 | I have to check it, but probably It doesn't exist. Google Street View shows a barrier from City Way side. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Yes, the whole "network of bridleways" doesn't look right to me. If these are "multi user paths", I would be tempted to tag as cycleways (with horse=yes if allowed / actually a bridleway) if a "paved" surface or paths (with relevant access tags) if a non-sealed surface. | |
| 4361794 | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | 2tefan ♦120 | Missing gravel tracks via StreetComplete_ee 58.2 |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Added | |
| 2292468 | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Two N/S strava traces here - not clear which is FP. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | Blarghera ♦0 | Right-Right,Left-Left. Easy. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | ||
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | phodgkin ♦2,373 | I don't know what this comment means! | |
| 3449934 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Plaque somewhere about here http://openplaques.org/plaques/11018 |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | phodgkin ♦2,373 | Added |