SK53 for the last 12 monthsSK53 for the last 12 months| Note | # | Tmstmp UTC | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1050108 | 1 | 2017-07-02 14:03 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | NCC Streetlights has this as 205a (& there is a Companies House entry for that address too). Related to other notes further along Brownlow Drive. So this house, No. 13 and the building currently between 140 and 142 need on-the-ground checks. |
| 2 | 2026-02-05 17:53 | closed | Sleath | ||
| 3 | 2026-02-05 19:28 | reopened | SK53 ♦3,856 | ||
| 2385329 | 1 | 2020-10-14 15:18 | opened | --- | Path linking Oldmoor Wood track and Shortwood bridle path, in regular use by local walkers over decades. |
| 2 | 2020-10-14 15:20 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Yep, I've just never got round to surveying it! | |
| 3 | 2020-10-14 15:21 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | See older note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1059162 | |
| 4 | 2020-10-14 15:22 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | From memory this as mapped is on wrong side of hedge | |
| 5 | 2020-10-14 22:21 | commented | Mapref | The path most commonly used moved east of the hedgeline when the margin on the west side was ploughed up to the hedge 3 or 4 years back. Other occasional attempts to restrict the route have been rendered futile this far by sheer persistence and numbers of users it seems (mainly dog walkers, ramblers and occasional cyclists and horse riders) | |
| 6 | 2020-10-15 22:42 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Reminder to myself. This is an excellent example of an informal path. | |
| 7 | 2026-01-31 13:27 | commented | fredgolightly ♦65 | Bottom of Robinettes is a formal Deposit which is this https://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/media/w4kdnmnh/s61.pdf essentially stating no public paths anyway on their land. Loath to close as if used for 20yes application can be made for row | |
| 8 | 2026-01-31 14:07 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Might be worth finding out if Notts Footpath Preservation are on it. I certainly used it around 2006/7 when it was very well marked. Probably have photographs from that date too. | |
| 9 | 2026-02-02 14:01 | commented | fredgolightly ♦65 | It seems they're more a walking club than anything else now. Email on website is just a empty mailto: link. The application process to have it recognises seems a little overwhelming. Shame as it's a great little fp which makes a great loop from Strelley I've seen 1000s of people do over the years. | |
| 10 | 2026-02-02 14:12 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | I've had mixed results with them. A few years ago (pre-Covid) they were quite active with making claims. But 15 years ago they were completely dismissive of OSM (and clearly, at the time, all retired). The Ramblers are the other group likely to be able to so something. Not sure how active they are locally. | |
| 5149100 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2026-01-31 09:08 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | La Maison des Ailes a vendu cet immeuble en Novembre '25 " exigences fiscaux". Voir https://www.mda-hdv.be/fr/ |
| 2 | 2026-01-31 13:58 | commented | bxl-forever ♦5,421 | I get your point, but I happened to be there some time ago and I confirm that the place itself is still labelled as the same name and there are still events here, even if the association sold the property itself. I suggest we keep it unchanged for the time being. | |
| 3 | 2026-02-04 16:52 | closed | bxl-forever ♦5,421 | Confirmed, no change in current branding. Let’s close this note now. | |
| 1036711 | 1 | 2017-06-21 08:11 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | club nit open |
| 2 | 2017-06-21 13:40 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | not open; continue to check status | |
| 3 | 2025-12-23 16:34 | closed | RTFurlong | ||
| 4 | 2025-12-25 20:45 | reopened | Aethonatic ♦156 | ||
| 5 | 2025-12-25 20:45 | commented | Aethonatic ♦156 | RTFurlong, please only set notes to resolved once the issue stated is fixed. | |
| 6 | 2025-12-25 20:58 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Ah last passed near in June, just may be around next week, but may be too much of a diversion to check. Did a lot of these when we met at a pub on Mansfield Road, which we haven't done for 6 years. | |
| 1657199 | 1 | 2019-01-21 12:55 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | Gating orders apply to paths of Brewsters Road from 2010 https://www.nottinghaminsight.org.uk/Document-Library/Document-Library/aAXOSpQ |
| 2 | 2025-12-17 18:45 | closed | RTFurlong | ||
| 3 | 2025-12-17 18:46 | reopened | RTFurlong | ||
| 4 | 2025-12-23 16:31 | closed | RTFurlong | ||
| 5 | 2025-12-25 20:43 | reopened | Aethonatic ♦156 | ||
| 6 | 2025-12-25 20:43 | commented | Aethonatic ♦156 | Unclear if actually resolved. SK53, could you check? | |
| 7 | 2025-12-25 20:56 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Unfortunately wrong side of city for me, and we dont currently have a mapper in that area. Most gating orders are permanent in my experience, but do need an on-the-geound check. | |
| 1905912 | 1 | 2019-08-30 06:23 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | Buildings partially replaced |
| 2 | 2025-12-23 16:35 | closed | RTFurlong | ||
| 3 | 2025-12-25 09:01 | reopened | SK53 ♦3,856 | Bit at a loss as to why this has been closed. Buildings as mapped do not correspond to current aerial imagery. Also looks like the Mechanics Arms has gone. | |
| 1029246 | 1 | 2017-06-13 17:49 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | Most buildings have been demolished |
| 2 | 2020-07-03 07:03 | commented | kevjs1982 ♦807 | Looks like some housing has been built near to Laburnum Grove. | |
| 3 | 2020-07-29 09:33 | commented | will_p ♦316 | I have updated this. The residential part of the development ("Beeston Quarter") is still at an early stage. The industrial/commercial units ("Trent Gateway") look closer to completion. | |
| 4 | 2025-12-18 10:03 | commented | Dave Venables ♦1,153 | The residential roads were added in July 2022 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123856839 and the alignment was improved today from Esri World Imagery https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176085797 but the map could be improved further | |
| 5 | 2025-12-18 10:11 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Cadastral parcels can be used as well. Transmission Avenue can certainly be improved with these (iD doesn't allow me to move it on the phone) | |
| 2660459 | 1 | 2021-05-08 12:34 | opened | --- | 11A |
| 2 | 2025-12-17 11:23 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | added but next door | |
| 3 | 2025-12-17 11:23 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | ||
| 2078421 | 1 | 2020-02-03 20:50 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | path access to terraces here needs checking, was untouched from my edits in 2009. Have used street light data to hopefully make a bit more accurate |
| 2 | 2025-03-12 09:36 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Have now added more, even the back alleys to provide access to back gardens (and rubbish bins.) are lit. | |
| 3 | 2025-12-15 18:14 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | See a note on a similar issue nearby: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2078421#map=15/52.89450/-1.19206&layers=N Ideally these things need a ground survey BUT given they are often effectively private access to people's back gardens it's rarely a good idea. | |
| 5019263 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-10-23 09:02 | opened | Mex ♦7,465 | where does this path go? |
| 2 | 2025-12-15 18:09 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | I would assume it provides access to the rear gardens of the houses (often for household bins). There's no sign of it emerging onto the main road : what I'd expect given the latter has no pavement on the S side. IIRC this estate was built around the 1980s. It has an intricate, and often non-intuitive network of footpaths. Probably similar to The Meadows and St Ann's. | |
| 1692447 | 1 | 2019-02-25 18:23 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | 5 steps to entrance in side |
| 2 | 2025-12-03 14:08 | closed | hephu ♦2 | ||
| 3 | 2025-12-03 16:22 | reopened | SK53 ♦3,856 | ||
| 4 | 2025-12-03 16:24 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Why have you resolved this note? You do not seem to have added the missing feature. | |
| 2422775 | 1 | 2020-11-13 15:06 | opened | TomJeffs ♦198 | Location of this bridge and the connected routes is approximate and is taken from the map in this tweet thread - https://twitter.com/StockportMBC/status/1327205873287131136 |
| 2 | 2025-11-28 17:15 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | Bridge aligns with awrials | |
| 4768860 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-20 23:09 | opened | --- | there's a path here between pedley street and mill street |
| 2 | 2025-11-28 17:11 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | Was added by quantumjinnx (sp?) a while back. | |
| 1666862 | 1 | 2019-01-31 15:12 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | There's a patch of Common Reed Phragmites australis here, but aerial photos are too coarse to pick it out. |
| 2 | 2025-11-11 13:27 | closed | dannmer ♦18,169 | added | |
| 3 | 2025-11-11 13:34 | reopened | dannmer ♦18,169 | ||
| 4 | 2025-11-27 11:22 | commented | therealzakie ♦52 | Why is this reactivated? Did you push the wrong button on accident or something? | |
| 5 | 2025-11-27 15:08 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Probably because it was deleted in a subsequent changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174511318. The note is consequently still valid. | |
| 4828678 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-27 20:26 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | There's a Rogue Tattoo on St Leonard's Road. I suspect they've moved from here as the latter address is on their website. |
| 2 | 2025-11-10 13:11 | closed | Sébastien Pi ♦1,680 | itsu is still here | |
| 3 | 2025-11-10 13:20 | reopened | SK53 ♦3,856 | ||
| 4 | 2025-11-10 13:33 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | Probably wasn't when I made the note, as I was looking for tattoo parlours in Windsor and found two Rogue Tattoos but not Black Heron (separate note if you're out & about). | |
| 2298278 | 1 | 2020-08-08 06:47 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | outbuilding demolished? |
| 2 | 2025-11-10 10:51 | commented | Dave Venables ♦1,153 | Removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220364348 Nothing obvious on bing maps aerial or esri world imagery | |
| 3 | 2025-11-10 10:54 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | ||
| 4829388 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-06-28 11:55 | opened | Peter Newman ♦2,842 | New housing estate here. Some still being built via StreetComplete 61.1 |
| 2 | 2025-08-13 06:10 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Gosh, forgot to add this when I surveyed before Xmas! | |
| 3 | 2025-08-13 06:37 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | Added | |
| 4 | 2025-08-24 11:38 | reopened | Peter Newman ♦2,842 | ||
| 5 | 2025-08-24 11:38 | commented | Peter Newman ♦2,842 | Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421964048 not need highway=construction too? | |
| 6 | 2025-08-24 11:41 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Yes would make sense :-). Aerial imagery is a bit difficult to work out where the access road.will be, but I presume off the bypass. The site slopes down to the bypass. | |
| 2081116 | 1 | 2020-02-06 17:22 | opened | --- | Work clearing planting (& presumably demolishing buildings) has started here (6-Feb-2020). See https://mobile.twitter.com/urbinfonotts/status/1207346526084878338 |
| 2 | 2020-10-10 13:27 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Work hasn't progressed much since then (site cleared but no more). No construction started, possibly map as brownfield | |
| 3 | 2021-06-08 18:40 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | More site clearing/levelling has happened but no sign of any action to start building. | |
| 4 | 2022-01-02 22:41 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Nada since then | |
| 5 | 2023-01-16 17:01 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Another year on, no work done | |
| 6 | 2023-02-04 14:57 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | May have been a small amount of rebar laid in places | |
| 7 | 2023-12-19 16:09 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Some real active work started on 11th Dec 2023. Fence came down alongside footpath, the newly laid grass between there and the Leen was ripped up, additional footpath blocked out, trees planted & some concrete laid. To do this the footbridge is closed until 22nd Dec. Presumably they might actually build the PBSA which they've had planning permission for since 2019 at the latest. | |
| 8 | 2024-09-20 23:32 | commented | Nathaniel Taulbut ♦69 | Some structure up now https://flic.kr/p/2qhz6ES | |
| 9 | 2024-11-23 09:26 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Yes, I really need to document the whole construction on Geograph as I have photos covering both abortive starts and the actual construction. Think it's a bit difficult to add the building still. | |
| 10 | 2025-08-11 10:19 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | Added as now visible on ESRi. Will probably need refinement once updated Bing imagery is available. | |
| 11 | 2025-08-17 09:58 | reopened | SK53 ♦3,856 | ||
| 12 | 2025-08-17 09:58 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Added as now visible on ESRi. Will probably need refinement once updated Bing imagery is available. | |
| 13 | 2025-08-17 09:58 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | ||
| 1051797 | 1 | 2017-07-03 19:43 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | Some of the houses here are Claremont Villas, Hawks Road |
| 2 | 2025-08-09 14:30 | closed | Wey2go ♦50 | Too vague to be useful and no longer used by residents here | |
| 3 | 2025-08-09 18:06 | reopened | SK53 ♦3,856 | ||
| 4 | 2025-08-09 18:10 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Really! These are live addresses along this road (as shown by, for instance, Zoopla https://www.zoopla.co.uk/house-prices/kingston-upon-thames/hawks-road/claremont-villas/kt1-3df/#!), someone local could just wall along it and spot them. I know they are in use because, until recently, friends of mine owned one. UPRNs etc may enable this to be resolved as it's possible that the Claremont Villas houses have a separate postcode from the rest of Hawks Road. Also if they are pre-war they may be on one of the out-of-copyright map layers. | |
| 5 | 2025-08-09 18:47 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | I've now added more information. There are pairs of semi detached houses on the S side of the road with each pair of houses having their own postcode. I've resolved a few of the building names, but not Claremont Villas (the Zoopla page is inadmissible for OSM). | |
| 6 | 2025-08-09 19:07 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | This old map shows all the addresses along this section of Hawks Road https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=19.0&lat=51.40821&lon=-0.29389&layers=173&b=osm&o=83 | |
| 3721636 | 1 | 2023-06-05 13:56 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | This should be 28 Thompson Road, but only a single parcel is shown from the Land Registry data. There are two doors visible on Bing Streetside, but one appears to be blocked. Also no apparent hedge or fence. |
| 2 | 2025-08-05 16:54 | commented | tomhukins ♦295 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299123283 has been mapped as "28 Thompson Avenue" (Avenue, not Road) since you left this comment. I suspect this note has been resolved, but I'm not marking it as resolved due to the street name discrepancy. | |
| 3 | 2025-08-05 17:04 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | Yes should be Thomson Avenue & addresses have been updated by Wynndale since I wrote the note. | |
| 4847499 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-10 07:07 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | This track napped as siding looks incorrect, as ford assignment of Crewe-Derby to Platform 4. Trains have left from platform 3 since at least 2023. |
| 2526924 | 1 | 2021-02-05 21:51 | opened | Math1985 ♦5,774 | Platform 5 is missing from the map |
| 2 | 2025-07-10 06:48 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | Seems fine now. | |
| 4831905 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-30 06:40 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | building could do with adjusting to actial footprint (too large now) |
| 4831897 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-30 06:33 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | Two memorial trees here: one to Nottingham Covid victims ( a Hornbeam) and immediately to the E one to an Iranian girl, victim of the Religious Police). I have coordinates of the first, but I think needs a more complete survey in relation to already mapped objects |
| 4828673 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-27 20:19 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | There's a tattoo parlour, Black Heron Tattoo, in one of these buildings. the shops look to have been unoccupied at the time of Paul the Archivist's survey 7 years ago (images in archive.org, e.g., https://archive.org/details/windsor-2018-09-15/Windsor%202018-09-15/DSCN7725.JPG). Website: https://www.blackherontattoo.ink/ |
| 2484320 | 1 | 2021-01-03 21:55 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | 85 new houses to be built here |
| 2 | 2025-06-17 14:54 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | Roads mapped now. | |
| 4805988 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-06-14 17:55 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | No longer a restaurant, but 4 holiday apartments (ground & first floor) IIRC |
| 2 | 2025-12-18 18:32 | closed | waterced ♦4,310 | ok, corrected | |
| 2235718 | 1 | 2020-06-20 10:00 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | This is the 2 Sisters meat packing factory/abattoir closed because of a Covid-19 outbreak. It may have changed name. |
| 2 | 2024-06-01 23:37 | commented | ceirios ♦1,713 | I believe this has now closed | |
| 3 | 2025-06-07 07:10 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | Have updated to reflect closure back in 2023. | |
| 1605938 | 1 | 2018-12-01 15:00 | opened | --- | This corner marked as part of the Capital is actually a ventilation tower for the dock branch of the Queensway tunnel. It was probably tied into the Capital when the 1960s/70s walkways were built. The walkway went over Fazakerley Street and one route went to the Old Hall St entrance to Moorfields. |
| 2 | 2018-12-01 15:30 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Twas me | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 13:44 | commented | SmithyScotland ♦1,903 | Have taken photos and will remap | |
| 4 | 2025-05-28 16:53 | commented | SmithyScotland ♦1,903 | Note with photos here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?note=4713393#map=19/53.408230/-2.994244 | |
| 5 | 2025-05-28 16:59 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | @SmithyScotland great work you're doing here and 'over the water'. I never get quite long enough to do proper mapping when visiting family, or, in this case, 'cos I worked in The Capital 25 years ago & sometimes rushed to Moorfields station along the remnants of the elevated walkways. | |
| 6 | 2025-06-02 13:39 | closed | SmithyScotland ♦1,903 | Have updated "New Quay Ventilation Station To The Mersey Road Tunnel" as it's known on Wikidata | |
| 4530818 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-24 02:50 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | Fellows currently closed, supposed to be reopening Dec '24 |
| 2 | 2025-04-29 09:07 | commented | kevjs1982 ♦807 | The canal end of this building is now carrying Castle Rock branding with the name "Canalhouse Bar" while on the side facing the canal is old signage saying "The Canal Museum" and underneath "Meganandtinks" (which is a name carried on a canal boat alongside "Nottingham Narrow Boat Project Ltd) Has this building been split into two? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-02 07:46 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Had a browse through recent Nottingham CAMRA newsletters, and the only item is this one in December: • Fellow Morton & Clayton reopened on 20 November 2024 | |
| 4549071 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-12-10 13:19 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | defibrillator & bleed control kit on platform side of this building |
| 2 | 2025-05-01 14:39 | commented | Flynn_ ♦140 | Is this the defibrillator or are there two on the platform? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12090252344 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-01 16:22 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Yes, I'd think do. Seen from the train, so location of note probably a bit displaced. I think it's the same as the one at Penzance station, which I think I tagged in detail. AFAIK they exist on every station in Cornwall. | |
| 4 | 2025-05-01 16:47 | closed | Flynn_ ♦140 | Closing as mapped then | |
| 5 | 2025-05-01 17:09 | reopened | SK53 ♦3,856 | ||
| 6 | 2025-05-01 17:10 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Not mapped accurately, as the bleed control kit is not mentioned. This is the one at Penzance https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12802693216 | |
| 7 | 2025-05-01 17:14 | commented | Flynn_ ♦140 | Ah, sorry. I didn't know you could tag those. Please do let me know if I've done it correctly | |
| 8 | 2025-05-06 10:34 | closed | Flynn_ ♦140 | ||
| 4581978 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-08 18:00 | opened | tomhukins ♦295 | The road here mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85394929 has the name "Hartshead Inn" which I suspect is incorrect. The road leads to Hartshead Inn, mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/957808869 but I suspect the road itself is unnamed. |
| 2 | 2025-04-28 03:35 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | agree, removed, downgraded to service too | |
| 1097273 | 1 | 2017-08-09 08:06 | opened | msevilla00 ♦1,735 | bilingual name: These Penglais /Penglais Terrace |
| 2 | 2023-12-10 00:28 | commented | ceirios ♦1,713 | ‘These’ is not a Welsh word, perhaps you mean ‘Teras’? It’s also currently mapped as Penglais Road in English and not Terrace | |
| 3 | 2024-02-21 15:07 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Likely Rhes Penglais and possibly only applying on one side of the road | |
| 4 | 2024-02-21 15:10 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Likely this terrace https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433110897 | |
| 5 | 2025-04-27 09:43 | commented | msevilla00 ♦1,735 | I remember it was a board with the bilingual name at the bottom of the street/road. Someone in the ground could check it. Cheers. | |
| 6 | 2025-04-27 09:54 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Further down Rhes Penglas / Penglas Terrace as seen on Bing Streetside (and therefore usable). It will apply solely to the single terrace and I'd expect housenumbers to be distinct from those on Fford Penglas / Penglas Road. Link: https://www.bing.com/maps/streetside/?&cp=52.416087~-4.077647&lvl=17&dir=46.145&style=x&q= | |
| 7 | 2025-04-27 09:56 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | And I added the relevant detail to the byilding=terrace some time ago, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433110897#map=19/52.416277/-4.077459&layers=N. So I think this can be resolved. | |
| 8 | 2025-04-27 11:21 | reopened | msevilla00 ♦1,735 | ||
| 9 | 2025-04-27 11:21 | closed | msevilla00 ♦1,735 | Great! Thanks | |
| 532156 | 1 | 2016-03-23 19:53 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | Construction happening here now. Really needs a survey soon. |
| 2 | 2016-08-03 14:02 | commented | kevjs1982 ♦807 | First survey of the new road layout done from partial GPS and observations. Looks like works are approaching completion (former road / new southbound c/way being surfaced ; pedestrian crossings being installed) | |
| 3 | 2019-03-24 13:13 | commented | kevjs1982 ♦807 | Need to find out what this estate is properly called. Developers call it Edwalton Chase/Fields/Park but all the new cycle signage directs you to "Sharphill". Currently mapped as different suburbs under the development names, | |
| 4 | 2025-04-15 17:29 | commented | kevjs1982 ♦807 | To add to the name confusion - the buses run to Edwalton Fields! | |
| 5 | 2025-04-15 17:42 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Might be worth splitting the residential areas up according to the development names (usage will probably decay over time), possibly with place=neighbourhood and keep the suburb as Sharphill alt_name=Edwalton Fields | |
| 6 | 2025-04-17 19:48 | commented | kevjs1982 ♦807 | Ageed. A Suburb existed of "Sharp Hill" but this is the least common form of the three that has been used (I'm the only one to have ever edited). Changed to name=Sharphill alt_name=Edwalton Fields alt_name:2=Sharp Hill which captures all three variants. The development names are now all neighbourhoods. | |
| 7 | 2025-09-28 11:14 | commented | Aethonatic ♦156 | Split the Sharphill suburb boundary and label so that it is more inline with other suburb labeling, hope this is okay with you all. | |
| 8 | 2025-09-28 11:22 | commented | Aethonatic ♦156 | Also, if it helps, the Rushcliffe Borough Council refers to the suburb as "Sharphill". | |
| 4604551 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-27 23:42 | opened | dlhcarnival | Lea Shaw has been closed since 2023. The road is not accessible by pedestrians or vehicles |
| 2 | 2025-01-27 23:42 | closed | dlhcarnival | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-27 23:42 | reopened | dlhcarnival | ||
| 4 | 2025-04-13 18:48 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | ||
| 3967607 | 1 | 2023-11-01 10:21 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | Large flat area. Covered reservoir? |
| 2 | 2025-04-13 17:22 | commented | tomhukins ♦295 | Does this note refer to the same area as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233325108 ? | |
| 3 | 2025-04-13 18:48 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | Most likely! | |
| 3906796 | 1 | 2023-09-24 20:59 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | Most of these houses are listed |
| 2 | 2025-03-25 22:10 | commented | Iwerne ♦114 | Your Note prompts two questions. Q1 - Should we be tagging 'Listed' status? OSM is supposedly about physical characteristics, not abstract descriptors? Q2 - There are allegedly over 4000 Listed buildings in Bristol, virtually none of them tagged as such. Where do we start? At what point can we close this Note? | |
| 3 | 2025-03-25 23:07 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Almost certainly all of them are so tagged, but with a wikidata tag giving no clue as to why such a tag has been applied. Listed status is much more explicit and easily verified: for instance it's not too hard to guess if something might be listed. It also has substantial value in OSM as a proxy for nice places, and as a guide if one is looking for places to buy (listed buildings have stringent planning rules). | |
| 2905706 | 1 | 2021-10-22 11:53 | opened | Mark Greenhalgh | "On the side of Turton Pavillion building, next to the notice board, just past the shipping container storage walking from to the parking area." POI has no name POI types: emergency-defibrillator OSM data version: 2021-05-24T07:43:34Z #mapsme |
| 2 | 2025-03-24 02:05 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | added | |
| 4674710 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-21 18:24 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | Je crois que cette batiment est numèro six, rue de l'Industrie. Siège social de Telmat, est aussi siège de Visorando. |
| 654904 | 1 | 2016-08-02 21:40 | opened | AndyGee001 | This is the correct location for the postcode ST10 1RH. All of the online maps and satnavs that I have used show this postcode at the location of Freehay Quarry, about 2km west of here, which is run by Hansons Aggregates. |
| 2 | 2016-08-02 21:48 | commented | SK53 ♦3,856 | Would be interested to know why you think its here. Official sources of data (including Royal Mail who own postcodes) think its at Freehay Quarry. See this map where you can select different public postcode sources http://oscompare.raggedred.net/?layers=BTFTTF&zoom=16&lat=52.9681&lon=-1.97296. Note these are centroids, it's possible that buildings sharing the postcode are some distance away (furthest is around 11 km somewhere in Scottish Highlands) | |
| 3 | 2016-08-02 21:57 | commented | AndyGee001 | I actually work there and visitors to our plant & offices are always complaining that they end up at Freehay Quarry. We usually give the postcode of the Queens pub (ST10 1RF) to folks that we know are coming to the site, with instructions to find us from there. | |
| 4 | 2025-03-13 23:58 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | The website gives the postcode ST10 1RF https://www.tarmac.com/locations/Croxden-Bagging-Plant/ | |
| 5 | 2025-03-16 18:50 | closed | AndyGee001 | The postcode for the Bagging Plant had always been ST10 1RF, as was the original northern area of the quarry, though I wasn't aware of that 8+ years ago. I attempted to indicate with my marker on the map where I believe the edge of the area that bounds ST10 1RF and where I believed the boundary of ST10 1RH began, 1RH suffix being the official post I was instructed to use. I worked further down the site at the mortar plant which was a later addition to the business, and not part of the quarry operation. I also now know that depending on where you look for the info that the area where I worked at Croxden Quarry (in Freehay) could also be said to be within the area bounded by ST10 1RJ. The Freehay Quarry (in Mobberley) has the postcode ST10 1TR and also shows to be ST10 1RH. Moving further east from Freehay Quarry the next area is given as ST10 1TS. Since my first comment on this, the postcode for the bagging plant appeared to have been adopted and used for the rest of the site in all the info and documents I dealt with later. So it appears that ST10 1RF would be the most appropriate postcode to use as this indicates the entrance to the site, off Coppice Lane. | |
| 6 | 2025-03-19 09:27 | reopened | SK53 ♦3,856 | ||
| 7 | 2025-03-19 09:31 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | Since this discussion started NSUL data from ONS allows one to look at individual UPRNs linked to postcodes : this is ST10 1RF https://uprn.uk/postcode/st101rf. Oddly ST10 1RH looks very similar. But both confirm the OP. (Closing again) | |
| 4667647 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-16 20:10 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | one of these Limes might not exist, couldn't tally counts |
| 4667648 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-16 20:10 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | another Scots Pine here |
| 4531123 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-11-24 10:24 | opened | ThyQuaint ♦6 | Development of Alvaredus is reportedly complete, a survey of the area would be much appreciated. https://www.eastmidlandsbusinesslink.co.uk/mag/property/vistry-group-completes-first-homes-at-alvaredus-in-fairham-nottingham/ |
| 2 | 2024-11-24 11:26 | closed | ThyQuaint ♦6 | ||
| 3 | 2024-11-24 11:26 | reopened | ThyQuaint ♦6 | ||
| 4 | 2024-11-24 11:55 | commented | ThyQuaint ♦6 | Correction: Only a small number of houses are actually complete, the rest is still under development. Nevertheless, a survey would still be appreciated. | |
| 5 | 2025-03-12 09:37 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | ||
| 4628468 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-15 19:16 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | All trees on this side of Parker's Piece are London Planes. There is a small group of Alders (Alnus cordata?) in the southernmost corner. |
| 2 | 2025-10-01 13:25 | commented | Mex ♦7,465 | added some taxon to these nodes | |
| 4134601 | 1 | 2024-03-01 20:57 | opened | Le Bayonnais | Université de Cambridge page 3 |
| 2 | 2024-04-27 13:33 | commented | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | likely personal note | |
| 3 | 2025-02-15 19:10 | closed | SK53 ♦3,856 | Agreed, no actionable info. Closed. | |
| 4628462 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-15 19:09 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | A couple of ordinary benches here. |
| 2 | 2025-04-12 09:34 | closed | kmpoppe ♦3,682 | Duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4628461 | |
| 4628461 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-15 19:08 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | Couple of ordinary benches missing here. |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 00:01 | closed | CycleStreets ♦320 | Added benches in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166633430 . | |
| 4628455 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-15 19:07 | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | ⁶Don't think a single crossing is best representation here. The separate pedestrian crossing is obscure enough on the ground. I'm pretty sure we've discussed how to map these in the past (might find a link when I get home). Specifically this representation is poor for people with limited sight. |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 00:23 | closed | CycleStreets ♦320 | Remodelled in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166633680 |