| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5141828 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | kingkingHK ♦518 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19120076 I think this has been completed? https://www.legco.gov.hk/tc/open-legco/press/yr2025/pr20251002-1.html |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177755230 | |
| 5117986 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | kingkingHK ♦518 | There is no way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459714974 is actually 30 degrees steep. (Also, `incline=` should be in percentage, not degrees.) |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,518 | Haven't been to this exact area before, but never say never. This "extreme" slope is half believable. | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | kingkingHK ♦518 | Not believable imo; it's 30 degrees, not percent. That's 57.7%. Probably can't even stand if it is that steep. | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,518 | I will point out that some "sidewalks" in this area are more like "side steps" due to extreme slope, and that "extreme" slopes are somewhat believable. As in, perhaps not really 30 degrees, but more like 20 degrees to 25 degrees, which is still "extreme". | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | kingkingHK ♦518 | I would like to point out that 30 degrees is basically the steepness of an escalator/a step without landings. Even the "side steps" still have significant landings (how else would frontage access work?) simply because they aren't that steep. Also, this is a vehicular road. Do you really think vehicles can travel up such a steep slope? | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | Did a quick survey at the site. The incline should be around 10 degree only or at most 15 degree. | |
| 7 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | seewhyso ♦189 | ||
| 8 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | kingkingHK ♦518 | It's actually 10 degrees. | |
| 9 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | kingkingHK ♦518 | Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179394604 ; closing. | |
| 5095569 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | kingkingHK ♦518 | Has this construction https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232397199 been finished? Aerial imagery seem to show a building here, although it is possible that the building shown is the one pre-redevelopment. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | kingkingHK ♦518 | Indeed construction finished. | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177746856 | |
| 5129818 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | kingkingHK ♦518 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2247720552 should probably be deleted |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | seewhyso ♦189 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177413789 wikidata relocated | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,518 | "Skylineblick" doesn't refer to any feature in Hong Kong, and is also a German descriptive name. Node can be deleted. | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | vectorial8192 ♦1,518 | Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177548991 ; closing. | |
| 4922555 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | vectorial8192 ♦1,518 | todo: review roundabout mapping |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | kingkingHK ♦518 | Could you please elaborate on what the issue this here/what is to be reviewed? I do notice that the mapping around here is a bit odd and most certainly wrong | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,518 | The roundabout feels wrong, but aerial imagery cannot see if this is an actual roundabout with an actual concrete kurb or simply just a turning circle. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | kingkingHK ♦518 | The central island is traversable, so I think it should be `highway=turning_circle`. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Kovoschiz ♦2,278 | There's a `=give_way` , so not entirely the most common `=turning_circle` , similar to `=mini_roundabout` | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | kingkingHK ♦518 | Is the presence of a give way a factor in determining whether something is a turning circle though? I feel like its main purpose is to let buses from the bus terminus do a u-turn and leave, fitting the definition of "a widened area of road that allows vehicles to turn more easily". | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,518 | I think the distinction is whether a "central circle" is visible. If a "central circle" is visible then it's basically a `=mini_roundabout`. The problem is, satellite imagery cannot see whether such "central circle" exists. | |
| 8 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | kingkingHK ♦518 | Not sure what you mean "visible", but there is indeed a painted circle in the middle: https://imgur.com/a/5uJE9Qi | |
| 9 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | HenryEK ♦42 | this looks more like a mini roundabout than a turning circle | |
| 10 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | seems we could close this one - with the imagery evidence confirming this to be a mini roundabout instead of a turning circle | |
| 5093695 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | vectorial8192 ♦1,518 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13161373501 Disconcerting. What is this? |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176080494; changed to common name, see https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20210202-hong-kongs-guardian-of-the-gods | |
| 5072015 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | maxso216 ♦17 | new pedestrian crossing open #OsmAnd |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175434034 | |
| 5071092 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | 严苑nnn | 鮨政 x 大湖 eng：SUSHI MASA 日料餐廳 |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | 3an ♦2 | ||
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | reopened | 3an ♦2 | ||
| 4 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | 3an ♦2 | ||
| 5 | ~ 10 months ago | reopened | kingkingHK ♦518 | ||
| 6 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | Closing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175339293 | |
| 5002038 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | --- | Abandoned, in disrepair. Survey. |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175425995 | |
| 5065714 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | kingkingHK ♦518 | Are https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4349334590 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3484066233 referring to the same bus stop? |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,518 | seems like it in particular, this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3484066233/history/1 came first, and is at the (afaik) correct position. | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175425755 | |
| 4316670 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | vectorial8192 ♦1,518 | Requesting to update GMB-NT 502 according to latest OSM road data |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | closed | 楊展博 | ||
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | reopened | vectorial8192 ♦1,518 | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,518 | Not done yet; please don't resolve! (Also, there is not any GMB 502 mapped here; there is however GMB 503.) | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | 楊展博 | Ok | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173607341 | |
| 2902762 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | pslau | AED Location 金鐘站 2號月台 (近第三卡) 金鐘站 每日 05:55 AM - 01:15 AM |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | closed | pslau | ||
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | reopened | pslau | ||
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | closed | pslau | ||
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | reopened | pslau | ||
| 6 | ~ 4 years ago | closed | pslau | ||
| 7 | ~ 4 years ago | reopened | pslau | ||
| 8 | ~ 4 years ago | closed | pslau | 位置：22.279412, 114.164559 | |
| 9 | ~ 4 years ago | reopened | pslau | ||
| 10 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173217470 there are actually AEDs in every MTR station | |
| 2900890 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | Whcohi ♦239 | 圓頭南坑 |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173206279 | |
| 4918153 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | kingkingHK ♦518 | The street and buildings are overlapping, implying incorrect positioning of either (or both) of them. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,518 | Might be real if building provides limited/full cover to pedestrian path at its address; common in older urban areas. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | kingkingHK ♦518 | Currently the buildings are mapped to almost overlap with the carriageway centreline, which I find unlikely. | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173083119 Had a walk and indeed there are hanging structures as roofs from some of the buildings, but they are not usually mapped to have the sidewalk "covered" like this | |
| 4926705 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | HKGn ♦1 | "Closed business." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-04T17:20:14Z POI name: 皇冠窗簾地氈 Crown Curtain POI types: shop-curtain #organicmaps android |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | kingkingHK ♦518 | Correct. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173074682 | |
| 3071736 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | Whcohi ♦239 | The talus area is grossly exaggerated. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | closed | Harry chau527 | ||
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | reopened | Kovoschiz ♦2,278 | ||
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | seewhyso ♦189 | presumably it is meant to be the boundary of Kadoorie Farm. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173074625 |