| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5229365 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,495 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/734194844/history has bicycle = yes|yes|no|no|yes|no Was it supposed to be bicycle:lanes ? And be per-lane tagging? |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,495 | see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152403159 | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | danielbarton ♦52 | I'm unsure whether this should even be kept. Whitfords Av. is tagged as bicycle=yes, and this is the only little small section that has this bicycle restriction. And the tag doesn't even make sense. Why it is left lane turning and left lane OK, but only one of the rightmost turning lanes, and for that matter, the further-left right turning lane? I would think to remove it. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,495 | well, if that makes no sense it should be removed altogether though looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/734194844/history - access also was like that? see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152403159 I also pinged in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75627557 | |
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | sb9576 ♦95 | Yes, it was supposed to be bicycle:lanes 😳. | |
| 6 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | sb9576 ♦95 | Done. |