| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 184040714 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 26) | What's the difference with Kung Um Rd? commented 2026-06-13 09:16:05 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,918 |
| 183873221 (Comments: 6) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 177) | Making an educated guess should be fine. We have just got new Esri imagery last year; I am not optimistic as to when the next update will occur. And then obviously you can't fly drones in the airport so one cannot capture imagery themselves. Alt... commented 2026-06-13 08:25:49 UTC by kingkingHK ♦372 |
| 150628067 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 177) | I provisionally disagree with the quoted changeset. commented 2026-06-13 08:21:52 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦171 |
| 183957905 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 177) | Good point on the Cheong Tat Road <-> AsiaWorld Expo corridor, that I did not consider. I will just reclass the roads. commented 2026-06-13 08:14:18 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦171 |
| 184044550 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 177) | To add to this situation, the two suspicious items are maps.me spams https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MAPS.ME#Questionable_edits commented 2026-06-13 07:45:55 UTC by kingkingHK ♦372 |
| 183974495 (Comments: 1) | Philip C (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please don't directly delete, as it still represent a store space, and may contain addresses or other info. This makes tracking and updating them more difficult, adding next user's effort, and wasting previous user's work. Change it to... commented 2026-06-12 09:03:19 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,918 |
| 184003462 (Comments: 1) | OctoberFifteenth (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please use `highway=footway` + `indoor=yes` instead of `highway=corridor`. commented 2026-06-12 08:04:22 UTC by kingkingHK ♦372 |
| 183973843 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 177) | The hatched area is so long, imo it is not a `service=emergency_access`. Just draw it as a single carriageway. Your method might be more acceptable is the hatched area is short and the road is wide, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15271... commented 2026-06-12 02:51:57 UTC by kingkingHK ♦372 |
| 183786098 (Comments: 5) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 177) | Ok, coincidentally the oval was covered by the bridge in both Esri and Esri Clarity, so I just didn't notice. There's nothing wrong with this changeset then. Sorry for disturbing! commented 2026-06-11 12:10:46 UTC by kingkingHK ♦372 |
| 183873457 (Comments: 2) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 177) | Indeed. Forgot about this. commented 2026-06-11 10:17:41 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦171 |
| 183921589 (Comments: 1) | solardo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Quarry Bay is clearly not a district. Please don't add false info. commented 2026-06-10 13:20:07 UTC by kingkingHK ♦372 |
| 123299525 (Comments: 6) | T－T (Discussed changesets: 3) | @T－T May you provide more information about this POI? I cannot find anything about it on the internet; searching "為群跌打" only returns results about a clinic in Yat Tung with the same name. commented 2026-06-10 13:18:56 UTC by kingkingHK ♦372 |
| 183632535 (Comments: 9) | jengelh (Discussed changesets: 152) | We are not suggesting based on widths only. These barriers are used on pedestrianized roads, and signposted roadways. Those sometimes have `kerb=raised` too. commented 2026-06-08 18:26:22 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,918 |
| 180536189 (Comments: 1) | NG_ (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi there, do you have more information about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493588817 ? Aerial imagery can only show trees in this area. Is this a usable hiking trail or a disused worksite access path? commented 2026-06-08 05:29:39 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦171 |
| 183725357 (Comments: 2) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 26) | It has been changed. Traffic light is N now. Proof: go to any traffic light in NT and see what's marked on the pole. commented 2026-06-07 11:30:07 UTC by kingkingHK ♦372 |