| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 175624789 (Comments: 1) | Meatba11s (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding this address. If you know the area well, then it would be great to add the other buildings and there addresses as well? Also if the construction work is finished we should be able to update the roads to re... commented 2025-12-07 23:15:51 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
 | 173776669 (Comments: 3) | Jojolaglandouille (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Guido, Yes, there were a few invalid relations, I've just fixed them. Thanks for letting me know. commented 2025-12-07 23:11:49 UTC by Jojolaglandouille ♦2 |
| 175543133 (Comments: 1) | gracar2002 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, looks good. Do you have any questions? commented 2025-12-07 23:02:00 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
 | 174165763 (Comments: 1) | ManuelB701 (Discussed changesets: 50) | Ist DB Lounge wirklich die Marke? Ich hatte die Berichterstattung [1] so verstanden, dass das einfach ein offener Wartebereich ist, und ja ein neues Konzept (war also wahrscheinlich vor einem Monat nicht zu erkennen). Auch beim Vorbeigehen ha... commented 2025-12-07 22:59:10 UTC by jkoe ♦5 |
| 171103005 (Comments: 2) | Map-Peter (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hallo Christian, in dieses CS hatte ich mehrere Stunden Arbeit reingesteckt. Was genau ist denn daran https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171103005 falsch das wirklich 100% davon in den Mülleimer sollen sollen? Gru&szl... commented 2025-12-07 22:57:40 UTC by Map-Peter ♦340 |
 | 175363914 (Comments: 7) | 4004 (Discussed changesets: 120) | да, на счет каждого случая соглашусь, но если постройка часть комплекса, то имеет смысл обьединить. лямус в Гродно - коммон нейм, поэтом... commented 2025-12-07 22:56:33 UTC by 4004 ♦1,928 |
 | 174316240 (Comments: 3) | Dark_Valor (Discussed changesets: 19) | If you hadn't tuned out of the thread immediately, you'd have noticed that the general majority landed on there's no reason to remove them, and they are useful for data consumers. commented 2025-12-07 22:55:02 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175412527 (Comments: 1) | James Wheare (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Jmes, this looks good to me! commented 2025-12-07 22:53:13 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
 | 175642628 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 59) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10766675478 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-12-07 22:51:18 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
 | 175614682 (Comments: 3) | Lysol90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tack för svar och snabb ändring! commented 2025-12-07 22:29:44 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦626 |
| 175641542 (Comments: 1) | olsen3737 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Obydwa zestawy zmian wycofane: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175642327 Pozdrawiam commented 2025-12-07 22:27:56 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
 | 66372894 (Comments: 1) | Mimac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravim, preco je bazen turistickou atrakciou? A hlavne ked je pristupny iba zakaznikom hotela? commented 2025-12-07 22:22:37 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,746 |
| 175558580 (Comments: 4) | Moepmoep (Discussed changesets: 3) | Danke. Jetzt sind die Wege auch aus der Kartenansicht verschwunden. commented 2025-12-07 22:19:39 UTC by george1201 ♦250 |
| 175356127 (Comments: 1) | Superstore Media (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, this is tagged as leisure=fitness_centre sport=boxing I think the more normal way of doing this is to use leisure=sports_centre as well as sport = (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre ) commented 2025-12-07 22:17:15 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
| 175583957 (Comments: 3) | RyanLittleKing (Discussed changesets: 1) | I meant to do lanes I'll fix that commented 2025-12-07 22:07:55 UTC by RyanLittleKing ♦1 |
| 175611576 (Comments: 1) | smartsammler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo smartsammler, du hast für die Pizzeria einen neuen Knoten angelegt. In dem Gebäude gab es schon einen leerstehenden Frisörladen, im Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5046880012. Hat die Pizzeria nicht die Frisör-R... commented 2025-12-07 21:53:47 UTC by george1201 ♦250 |
| 165554045 (Comments: 4) | Ich124 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ach ne habe da was verwechselt alle laufen gegen den Uhrzeigersinn, https://www.ludwigsfelderkieze.de/der-trimm-dich-pfad auf dem Übersichtsschild ist das leider nicht zu erkennen, aber ich glaube ich weiß nun, was du meinst. Ich mache ... commented 2025-12-07 21:43:36 UTC by Ich124 ♦4 |
 | 175510650 (Comments: 1) | wavewings (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33411031/ I realise things have changed a lot in the port, but maxspeed=60 near the quayside? commented 2025-12-07 21:21:41 UTC by VictorIE ♦973 |
| 175639381 (Comments: 1) | Bogus181 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jaki jest cel dodawania i od razu usuwania tych punktów? commented 2025-12-07 21:06:32 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
 | 174021564 (Comments: 1) | marcus_jenkins (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, why did you create a power plant that is proposed and not under construction? could not you add a note with the information so it could be added in the future when the construction starts? Have you made more editions like this? Regards commented 2025-12-07 21:04:25 UTC by kapazao ♦950 |
 | 175638210 (Comments: 2) | Pandahero (Discussed changesets: 1) | Positie veranderen is geen probleem. commented 2025-12-07 21:00:29 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
 | 175338821 (Comments: 2) | AlexM51 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi. I'm thinking about better tagging for different services and finally choose "service:name" which can be localized in standard way. Local train routes in Japan often too short to classify as regional. commented 2025-12-07 20:59:32 UTC by AlexM51 ♦3 |
 | 175639902 (Comments: 1) | Sharko_J (Discussed changesets: 43) | Accidentally uploaded without specifying "import", I only noticed it after clicking Upload and the Cancel button did nothing thanks JOSM commented 2025-12-07 20:58:44 UTC by Sharko_J ♦98 |
| 175454381 (Comments: 3) | saunter (Discussed changesets: 54) | Thanks, I fixed those issues https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175639988 commented 2025-12-07 20:57:19 UTC by saunter ♦17 |
| 172773729 (Comments: 6) | Nzau (Discussed changesets: 73) | N'hésitez pas à faire des modifs directement ^^ commented 2025-12-07 20:52:29 UTC by Nzau ♦145 |
| 175595315 (Comments: 4) | extua (Discussed changesets: 5) | there is a door on canal street for number 43, and a door around the corner on cranham street for number 42, both on what looks like the same building commented 2025-12-07 20:50:57 UTC by extua ♦6 |
| 120142421 (Comments: 1) | windkraft-os (Discussed changesets: 25) | Wieso ist eine Aufstellfläche vor einem Windgenerator ein Windgenerator an sich? Überlege mal, was du hier kartierst. commented 2025-12-07 20:30:31 UTC by Protoxenus ♦323 |
| 163752290 (Comments: 5) | Kurt PM Lapere (Discussed changesets: 11) | Dans les 3, je ne vois « Port d’échouage » que dans la carte de 1900. L’histoire est sur un autre site qu’OSM : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Ne_cart... commented 2025-12-07 20:27:16 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦42 |
| 175637113 (Comments: 1) | xBitsNL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag xBitsNL, Lijkt me helemaal oke zo. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-07 20:26:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175632045 (Comments: 1) | OP13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag OP13, Ik heb het iets aangepast bij het bruggetje en NL:G11 tagging toegevoegd. Zie ook https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@53.23978,6.641196,20/?datastrip=20251124_PNEO-03 Mapse, eggie commented 2025-12-07 20:23:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 174021676 (Comments: 3) | Bocian999 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Usunąłem i naniosłem zgodnie ze stanem w terenie. commented 2025-12-07 20:18:02 UTC by uprkos ♦75 |
 | 175631549 (Comments: 1) | dariuspi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Laba diena. Nereikia klausyti absoliučiai JOKIŲ iD redaktoriaus patarimų, nes tai labai prasta įranga ir siūlo nesąmones. Taipogi nereikia šaligatvių žymėti kaip atskirų vektorių, nereikia dėlioti dvigubų perėjų ir pan. Š... commented 2025-12-07 20:16:17 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,004 |
 | 175056077 (Comments: 23) | RLakhani (Discussed changesets: 29) | > As a road does not connect across the border, as in the numerous examples above, your claim is wrong. You cannot cross here for literally 60 years. This is not a temporary closure as the examples you compared it to. Yeah, and Pakistani&#... commented 2025-12-07 20:12:35 UTC by Jacksonville ♦25 |
 | 175637316 (Comments: 1) | Cat2006 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Здравей, Това не са самостоятелни университети, поради което им бях сложил amenity=faculty. И аз бих искал да се показват на картата, но не е о... commented 2025-12-07 20:09:38 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦750 |
| 175635535 (Comments: 1) | De Lage Linie - Professionele coaching en therapie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM. Bedankt voor uw bijdrage, Ik heb wat aangepast zodat het straks te zien zal zijn op de kaart. Format postcode en phone aangepast. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-07 20:08:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 156923851 (Comments: 1) | Baumschrat (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356930014/history has shop = wheelchair that was added in this edit shop=wheelchair ? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=medical_supply ? If yes, what is the di... commented 2025-12-07 20:07:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
 | 174286268 (Comments: 1) | w_djatmiko (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13285116772/history has natural = 1796 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-07 20:05:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 172981669 (Comments: 1) | ellaisabellacat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12823859387/history has shop = smoke that was added in this edit Is it the same as shop=headshop - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=headshop ? Or the same as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2025-12-07 20:05:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
 | 162635200 (Comments: 1) | DHRUV BHARADWAJ (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12596600129 - is it selling only batteries? By name it seem to sell also invertors. Is it selling also solar pannels? commented 2025-12-07 20:04:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 117336427 (Comments: 1) | KB-01 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/804819985/history has maxweight = 29.9371 that was added in this edit this value is unexpectedly long and detailed - is it really correct? commented 2025-12-07 20:01:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 128444727 (Comments: 1) | Linz8444 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10154905549/history has shop = home_improvement that was added in this edit Is it shop=doityourself ? If not, how it differs from shop=doityourself? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=doityou... commented 2025-12-07 20:01:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175615436 (Comments: 3) | thetornado76 (Discussed changesets: 151) | Ok, danke für die Klarstellung commented 2025-12-07 20:01:00 UTC by kadiwa ♦50 |
| 168743838 (Comments: 1) | fdsfdsafdsadfsfdsafafds (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hej. Skąd źródło tej nazwy? W Polskim Rejestrze Nazw Geograficznych to wzgórze nie ma nazwy. commented 2025-12-07 20:00:29 UTC by SpinOff ♦338 |
| 168372819 (Comments: 2) | larsdahlin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Have changed osm.org/node/12967280400/history . It was the effect in the charging pole. commented 2025-12-07 20:00:13 UTC by larsdahlin ♦1 |
 | 174458237 (Comments: 1) | olehz (Discussed changesets: 208) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13294289033/history has aeroway = 18 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-07 19:59:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175632520 (Comments: 1) | dcenkuwibeks (Discussed changesets: 2) | Diese Haltestellenposition hat nur noch einen Mast mittig für alle Linien, seit kein SEV der U2 mehr ist. Die Busse fahren auch bis hier hin vor. Den alten südlichen Mast (wo jetzt nur noch der Monitor hängt) konnte ich ... commented 2025-12-07 19:58:12 UTC by dcenkuwibeks ♦1 |
| 168744923 (Comments: 1) | fdsfdsafdsadfsfdsafafds (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hej. Jakie jest źródło tej nazwy? Kolejne pytanie - ta góreczka według numerycznego modelu terenu jest tylko o 5m wyższa od otaczającego terenu. Czy oznaczanie tego typu obiektów ma sens? commented 2025-12-07 19:57:42 UTC by SpinOff ♦338 |
| 161983358 (Comments: 2) | vojtechzaboril (Discussed changesets: 152) | Hi, yes definitely. I fixed it now. Thanks for notice. commented 2025-12-07 19:50:47 UTC by vojtechzaboril ♦225 |
| 172559284 (Comments: 1) | fdsfdsafdsadfsfdsafafds (Discussed changesets: 5) | Poprawiłem na natural=hill https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:natural%3Dhill commented 2025-12-07 19:48:18 UTC by SpinOff ♦338 |
 | 175604808 (Comments: 1) | Jiblolds (Discussed changesets: 6) | Please don't blindly accept the recommendations from the editor to change the names of features. The proper name, as in the one that goes in the `name=*` tag, should be in french in Quebec, regardless of what the editor tries to suggest commented 2025-12-07 19:46:27 UTC by wolfy1339 ♦38 |
| 175600292 (Comments: 2) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 44) | I don't think replacing the border of an area with a street that doesn't exist could be described as anything other than a mistake. You'll notice I didn't replace the houses. commented 2025-12-07 19:43:03 UTC by TomJeffs ♦30 |
| 172414011 (Comments: 6) | DLRLA2025BI (Discussed changesets: 3) | Apologies for an incorrect statement I made 2 days ago. The signage (even if outdated and inconsistent) is present between Rheinhausen and Rußheim. That was an oversight on my side when I was writing my response. As of Nove... commented 2025-12-07 19:40:03 UTC by DLRLA2025BI ♦1 |
| 172559138 (Comments: 1) | fdsfdsafdsadfsfdsafafds (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175637244 commented 2025-12-07 19:38:53 UTC by SpinOff ♦338 |
| 155484309 (Comments: 1) | WakefieldMapper (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776541567/history has shop = bus that was added in this edit shop=bus ? What is sold here? bus tickets? bus vehicles? something else? commented 2025-12-07 19:38:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 169599518 (Comments: 1) | StephaneP (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13031061398/history has shop = bus that was added in this edit shop=bus ? What is sold here? bus tickets? bus vehicles? something else? commented 2025-12-07 19:38:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 168188228 (Comments: 1) | fdsfdsafdsadfsfdsafafds (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hej. Jakie jest źródło nazwy tego wzniesienia? Numeryczny model terenu nie pokazuje w tym miejscu więcej niż 230m, więc skąd wysokość 235m? commented 2025-12-07 19:37:56 UTC by SpinOff ♦338 |
| 168251795 (Comments: 1) | Andy6325 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12960570334/history has power = 22 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-07 19:36:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 156098641 (Comments: 1) | Daniel Heimburgg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12151592164/history has power = 22 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-07 19:36:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 130716525 (Comments: 1) | niklashan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10296641791/history has power = 22 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-07 19:36:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
 | 158454130 (Comments: 1) | werbefläche (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12293859683/history has power = 22 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-07 19:36:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
 | 175463518 (Comments: 1) | NGlf (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13352053040/history has power = 22 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-07 19:36:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175592661 (Comments: 2) | Peter Hanecak (Discussed changesets: 2) | OK, vdaka za upozornenie. commented 2025-12-07 19:34:29 UTC by Peter Hanecak ♦2 |
 | 175098342 (Comments: 1) | sasa15081980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zdravo sasa15081980, Dobrodošao u OSM zajednicu. Pohvale za dodavanje detalja o objektima na mapu. Da li ti je potrebna neka pomoć? Ukoliko želiš da kontaktiraš sa drugim maperima u Srbiji to možeš da urad... commented 2025-12-07 19:32:46 UTC by MaliMrav ♦63 |
| 174056437 (Comments: 4) | Jobigutenburg (Discussed changesets: 34) | Regarding historically significant sites, I have doubts if they should be mapped on OSM or not. I opened the discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-historically-significan-sites-without-physical-representation/139032 |
| 175605321 (Comments: 3) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 111) | Of course once you have mapped a separate pavement then cycle access is totally uncontroversial from the perspective of law abiding citizens. THE LAW - Highway Code Rule 64 You MUST NOT cycle on a pavement. OSM - cycling=no Indica... commented 2025-12-07 19:17:15 UTC by Pete Owens ♦73 |
 | 175636375 (Comments: 1) | ParadoX_ZLWC (Discussed changesets: 328) | Hello, thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks and happy mapping! commented 2025-12-07 19:16:40 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦42 |
| 175468426 (Comments: 1) | Mrksmlk (Discussed changesets: 16) | O dzięki, przegapiłem jakoś commented 2025-12-07 19:15:39 UTC by Yukiroshi ♦30 |
| 119475654 (Comments: 3) | ibanez (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ah danke, das habe ich übersehen! commented 2025-12-07 19:14:32 UTC by rohieb ♦128 |
| 175634929 (Comments: 1) | dcenkuwibeks (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sehr schön gemappt! :) Aber nicht vergessen, den vorher an der Straße eingetragenen Gehweg und Radweg wieder auszutragen (Hab ich jetzt gemacht). Und ich habe die vorher eingetragene Gehwegoberfläche auf den neuen Gehweg übertrag... commented 2025-12-07 19:12:07 UTC by kadiwa ♦50 |
| 175237096 (Comments: 4) | kiwilecker (Discussed changesets: 3) | Um die Indexierung gings mir gar nicht, sondern die Diskussion als ganzes - es sind sich ja alle einig, sich uneinig zu sein. Ich will auch gar nicht irgendwem auf die Füße treten oder so, ich bin nur gerade dabei die gesamte Strecke vo... commented 2025-12-07 19:08:17 UTC by kiwilecker ♦3 |
 | 174478596 (Comments: 4) | rusjanis (Discussed changesets: 12) | Skaidrs, pielaboju. Tas ir planter box "puķpods". Šim te pagriezienam arī except=bicycle jāliek, citādi velo arī aizliedz https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19805014 . Drausmīgs tiktoks... commented 2025-12-07 19:06:16 UTC by HellMap ♦767 |
| 175622720 (Comments: 1) | Marius Brüser (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Wenn kein Schild vorhanden ist, hat sich die Erfassung von fire_hydrant:diameter:signed=no ref:signed=no eingebürgert. Unter anderem fragt dann die App StreetComplete ni... commented 2025-12-07 18:56:21 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
 | 175604706 (Comments: 9) | Sara1000 (Discussed changesets: 11) | The reason for the changes is that all these places have been moved to another location. commented 2025-12-07 18:50:34 UTC by Sara1000 ♦4 |
| 175595624 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 7) | The node that was accidentally created was deleted in changeset 175635551 since it served no real purpose. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175635551 commented 2025-12-07 18:41:38 UTC by JakovBušić ♦17 |
 | 175624249 (Comments: 1) | Eduardo675675 (Discussed changesets: 1) | В названии должно быть только название, без типа объекта и/или ключевых слов. Я верну как было. commented 2025-12-07 18:30:39 UTC by fndoder ♦104 |
 | 175354055 (Comments: 4) | Antplanproje (Discussed changesets: 2) | teşekkürler telegram üzerinden talepte bulundum, commented 2025-12-07 18:27:02 UTC by Antplanproje ♦2 |
| 175451076 (Comments: 1) | Yaaaaaaaa (Discussed changesets: 52) | Salut Yann, Je pense que ton node est un doublon de celui là node/13302415440, antérieur de quelques jours. Et je vois que la zone mériterait un coup de polish vu les travaux : le parking way/332873737 (et le chemin way/120... commented 2025-12-07 18:24:01 UTC by LudovicG ♦107 |
| 175521764 (Comments: 3) | tjnakano (Discussed changesets: 118) | I’ve reverted this change (as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175634900) as above. Happy to chat if you think the reasoning above is incorrect :) commented 2025-12-07 18:21:47 UTC by gurglypipe ♦953 |
| 175577086 (Comments: 6) | Denis_Helfer (Discussed changesets: 72) | Ok Merci commented 2025-12-07 18:20:22 UTC by michel60 ♦90 |
| 174766641 (Comments: 1) | trailschneck (Discussed changesets: 62) | Da sind jetzt zwei Cafes mit fast gleichem Namen, ich fürchte du hast das übersehen und doppelt eingetragen, oder? Wäre cool wenn du noch mal nachschauen/korrigieren kannst. (Ich war noch nie vor Ort.) Danke :) commented 2025-12-07 18:19:40 UTC by dreua ♦123 |
| 175621580 (Comments: 5) | akiaida (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 commented 2025-12-07 18:12:51 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 174423070 (Comments: 1) | Elliot12345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175634608 commented 2025-12-07 18:10:21 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,507 |
| 175444270 (Comments: 3) | NikoJorj (Discussed changesets: 12) | En France, tous doivent publier sur https://www.data.gouv.fr/ c'est la source officielle des ref mais il faut aller chercher l'opérateur que tu veux Ensuite c'est agrégé en un seul fichier https://www.dat... commented 2025-12-07 18:03:31 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,326 |
| 175634005 (Comments: 1) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 194) | Revert 175126040 commented 2025-12-07 17:55:15 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦822 |
| 173697375 (Comments: 2) | Dblcut3 (Discussed changesets: 21) | on further update, the building construction tag should only be used when the building actually exists and has 4 walls, near completion, so i have deleted it; the landuse=construction surrounding the site is still there and applicable. commented 2025-12-07 17:40:54 UTC by skorasaurus ♦217 |
| 147970865 (Comments: 1) | mapboy63 (Discussed changesets: 2) | In the spirit of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element I suggest it makes sense to only map Chorltonville once, not twice. The feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107039785 with identical tag... commented 2025-12-07 17:34:06 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 157769805 (Comments: 3) | rademalis (Discussed changesets: 68) | Sprawdzone. Poprawione. Tory nie zostały usunięte. commented 2025-12-07 17:29:34 UTC by rademalis ♦5 |
| 175631795 (Comments: 1) | Aeexly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Такие канавы с водой отмечаем как waterway=ditch. Исправил вашу правку и сопутствующие в этом месте. Waterway=drain это облицованные каналы для пропус... commented 2025-12-07 17:28:46 UTC by Wise_Turtle ♦11 |
| 173986890 (Comments: 3) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 960) | le soucis est que les valeurs erronées/périmé étaient deja dans osm et osmose ne gère que les tags qu'ils connait (il ne connait pas encore la puissance des prises, cela arrive bientot j'espère) ... commented 2025-12-07 17:16:15 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,326 |
| 158766667 (Comments: 7) | BrackoNe (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hvala! commented 2025-12-07 17:16:10 UTC by BrackoNe ♦111 |
| 175470971 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_MapObscura (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why are you adding highway=crossing nodes at intersections of sidewalks and driveways or other minor service ways? For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6907099584#map=19/34.135201/-118.009412 This is not standard on OSM, and ... commented 2025-12-07 17:11:28 UTC by CRCulver ♦204 |
 | 175424938 (Comments: 1) | Tiramiso (Discussed changesets: 1) | Why did you remove the border-control name= tags from this node? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2063357044 commented 2025-12-07 17:08:30 UTC by CRCulver ♦204 |
 | 175631491 (Comments: 2) | berenluth (Discussed changesets: 2) | dai un occhio qui se hai dubbi! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses commented 2025-12-07 17:03:47 UTC by McCio ♦12 |
| 175631670 (Comments: 1) | berenluth (Discussed changesets: 2) | il sito è meglio metterlo completo, in questo caso https://www.casecarlet.it/ (senza www pare che non lo trovi) commented 2025-12-07 17:02:23 UTC by McCio ♦12 |
 | 175628745 (Comments: 1) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello, It looks like you redrew some buildings in Cranfield (England), drew a couple of structures in the north-east of Scotland and added a trail in North Korea. As a consequence, your change is now showing as a huge bounding box sprea... commented 2025-12-07 16:55:13 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,663 |
| 175631511 (Comments: 2) | javl (Discussed changesets: 5) | .. landuse in Park Molenbeke hersteld. Wanneer het overwegend gras is kun je ook grass taggen en dan losse bomen toevoegen. De naam staat dus op de laag leisure=park die overal overheen ligt. Gr eggie commented 2025-12-07 16:54:38 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
 | 175267436 (Comments: 1) | Decorator1 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I commented about this before, but tree canopies of individual trees shouldn't be mapped as landuse=forest, use tree nodes instead. commented 2025-12-07 16:31:38 UTC by Sakari_N ♦99 |
| 152249425 (Comments: 2) | Teddy73 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hallo Martin, hier ist ein Link zur Umwidmung: https://www.enkenbach-alsenborn.de/ratsinfo/vorlage/tLVnnjxpBIPAW2I2/abstufung-von-teilflaechen-der-k-42-sowie-aufstufung-der-gemeindestrasse-haselheckerstrasse-hainweg-zur-k-42/ VG Teddy commented 2025-12-07 16:10:44 UTC by Teddy73 ♦31 |
| 175568670 (Comments: 2) | Apathetic_Engineer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh good point. I was assuming river ment commercially navigable (Calcasieu, Mississippi, Sabine River, intracostal), but I reviewed the wiki and see that I need to reduce my threshold for what a big channel would be. I’ll update it. Good tip on... commented 2025-12-07 16:09:44 UTC by Apathetic_Engineer ♦2 |
| 175235375 (Comments: 4) | Tomas09 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Kan gebeuren. Kleine tip, voordat je aan zo'n ingrijpende wijziging begint, kijk even wat en wanneer de vorige wijzigingen waren, mocht dat onlangs zijn, dan zou het kunnen zijn dat je met oude data aan het werk bent en dat je je pannen moet... commented 2025-12-07 16:07:35 UTC by Geim ♦195 |
| 175558560 (Comments: 4) | Dannox (Discussed changesets: 33) | Uit de wiki.. The building and the way should have shared nodes at the entry and exit points of the building. commented 2025-12-07 16:07:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175614974 (Comments: 4) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 330) | Hallo zusammen, ich bin über https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Germany#10/51.8867/13.9217 aufmerksam geworden. Meiner Meinung nach sollten Kreisverkehre ausschließlich nur dann aufgesplittet werden, wenn es baulich erfor... commented 2025-12-07 16:04:20 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,106 |
| 175597389 (Comments: 2) | Trevor_1 (Discussed changesets: 185) | Sorry, I was just used to doing that. I can change it back commented 2025-12-07 15:55:15 UTC by Trevor_1 ♦272 |
| 162755414 (Comments: 2) | the-wouter (Discussed changesets: 18) | Sure, makes sense. Feel free to change the tagging 🙂 commented 2025-12-07 15:54:05 UTC by the-wouter ♦30 |
| 163345694 (Comments: 1) | Probertp (Discussed changesets: 14) | Ahoj, tu mi vyhadzuje po mierovom namesti,že tade ide žltá turistická trasa a zároveň je na tej istej ceste tag foot=use_sidepath, čo sa medzi sebou bije. Nevidím, kto prvý pridával ten tag, vidím ... commented 2025-12-07 15:45:49 UTC by moonraver ♦43 |
 | 173412472 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 19) | Bonjour Pierre, lors du traitement de ce signalement, tu avais désactivé un tronçon nettement trop long du chemin piétons-vélos. Seule la partie en amont a été renaturée, alors que toute la p... commented 2025-12-07 15:44:29 UTC by MFlamm ♦66 |
| 175598123 (Comments: 3) | businessesMan (Discussed changesets: 17) | Danke für die Antwort. Das ist tatsächlich interessant. Ich hatte es noch gar nicht hinbekommen, die Linie 105 auf hvv.de zu finden, also auch danke für den Link. commented 2025-12-07 15:25:58 UTC by kadiwa ♦50 |
| 172443845 (Comments: 1) | i61hcakz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, le chemin est un contour extérieur appartenant à une relation landuse=farmland, il n'a pas besoin de porter cet attribut. Bien cordialement. commented 2025-12-07 15:25:34 UTC by zorglubu ♦345 |
| 175615566 (Comments: 1) | danill2001 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Прошу вас писать осознанные комментарии к правкам, а не просто набор букв commented 2025-12-07 15:23:20 UTC by literan ♦6,895 |
| 175278329 (Comments: 2) | danill2001 (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://osmcha.org/changesets/175278329 commented 2025-12-07 15:21:25 UTC by literan ♦6,895 |
| 175605911 (Comments: 1) | Gemma Petite (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please don't remove the outlines of the building unless they have been demolished, just remove the tags that specify what the building is if that has changed. commented 2025-12-07 15:18:36 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
 | 175627647 (Comments: 1) | contrapunctus (Discussed changesets: 26) | The route members are derived from another route relation, and are not completely correct. The route has currently been corrected up to New Jalpaiguri. I'll correct the rest of it in the coming days. commented 2025-12-07 15:18:29 UTC by contrapunctus ♦51 |
 | 167528564 (Comments: 1) | Flayer (Discussed changesets: 72) | Hi! I was cycling in the area ans saw some inconsistencies. Is there a new bridge being built for pedestrians? Why did you mark a foot path? Is it separate path or just a sidewalk on the bridge? commented 2025-12-07 14:46:09 UTC by Dindia ♦27 |
 | 175589168 (Comments: 1) | Nickinton (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ya se encuentra mapeado el club aquí: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6888747 Por favor, no duplicar elementos en el mapa. Se elimina nodo duplicado y se actualizan datos en el área correspondiente. Saludos. commented 2025-12-07 14:44:34 UTC by mweper ♦437 |
| 155913718 (Comments: 6) | Harald Hetzner (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hallo Bergfrei, die Bank werde ich wohl verschoben haben, damit sie auf der gleichen Seite des Weges bleibt. Ich habe sie nach Augenmaß verschoben und nicht nachgemessen. Wenn sie zu weit abseits ist, dann rücke sie einfach wieder n&aum... commented 2025-12-07 14:43:01 UTC by Harald Hetzner ♦26 |
| 175621321 (Comments: 3) | Helium314 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ok :) Werd es mir bei Gelegenheit anschauen. commented 2025-12-07 14:42:04 UTC by coatix ♦6 |
| 175563189 (Comments: 2) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dodałem budynki i drogi korzystając z ortofotomapy i wizyty w terenie. commented 2025-12-07 14:41:15 UTC by Lishoo ♦6 |
| 175620902 (Comments: 2) | PouleNoire (Discussed changesets: 2) | Furthermore, this new building looks rather strange: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456669044 commented 2025-12-07 14:37:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,707 |
| 175619972 (Comments: 1) | PouleNoire (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, as an outside observer these changes seem somewhat unusual to me. Existing OSM buildings are being deleted on a large scale and more or less the same buildings are being reimported. Has this been discussed or agreed with the loc... commented 2025-12-07 14:35:58 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,707 |
| 175558596 (Comments: 2) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Zlikwidowałem przejazd kolejowy, korzystałem z nagranego śladu. commented 2025-12-07 14:34:32 UTC by Lishoo ♦6 |
| 175586239 (Comments: 2) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 268) | I nie bardzo rozumiem na jakiej podstawie łączysz ekrany akustyczne na nasypie z drogą która przechodzi pod nim - to nie jest poprawne commented 2025-12-07 14:33:26 UTC by syntex ♦890 |
| 175614931 (Comments: 1) | jaskiniamc_pl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć, dzięki za edycje. Pamiętaj proszę, że: 1. Korzystanie z map Google jako źródła nie jest dozwolone, a w description fryzjera na to się powołałeś/aś. 2. Nazwa obiektu powinna być tylko nazwą własną. Człony opisowe ... commented 2025-12-07 14:31:52 UTC by uprkos ♦75 |
| 174513033 (Comments: 1) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade. Hier ook. Het is inmiddels weer hersteld. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174513033 warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway \t8 MVG eggie commented 2025-12-07 14:30:15 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175523554 (Comments: 2) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dodałem budynki i drogi korzystając z ortofotomapy i poprzedniej wizyty w terenie. commented 2025-12-07 14:30:12 UTC by Lishoo ♦6 |
 | 175617464 (Comments: 1) | Youness_ss (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi Youness, it doesn't exist because, as its tags say, it's "proposed". ADM already found the companies that will build it and construction will begin very soon. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoroute_continentale_Rabat_-_... commented 2025-12-07 14:29:56 UTC by ilias_ ♦376 |
| 175559978 (Comments: 2) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dodałem budynki i drogi korzystając z ortofotomapy i poprzedniej wizyty w terenie. commented 2025-12-07 14:29:54 UTC by Lishoo ♦6 |
| 175523308 (Comments: 2) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Dodałem budynki i drogi korzystając z ortofotomapy i poprzedniej wizyty w terenie. commented 2025-12-07 14:29:30 UTC by Lishoo ♦6 |
| 135677248 (Comments: 2) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 131) | Yes, Tag:shop=trade + trade=building_supplies is equivalent here. I've updated the tags. commented 2025-12-07 14:28:50 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦292 |
| 174384906 (Comments: 2) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | Probeer eens te reageren op opmerkingen zodat je minder fouten gaat maken. https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18421285 MVG eggie commented 2025-12-07 14:28:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175423283 (Comments: 6) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Jak byłem ostatnio to leżał tylko śnieg, ale faktycznie kiedy byłem miesiąc wcześniej to był tam wysypany żwir. Tag service będzie dobrym wyborem. Pozdrawiam. commented 2025-12-07 14:25:50 UTC by Lishoo ♦6 |
| 175103126 (Comments: 2) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | Wat is emergency maxheight? Waar staat dat in de wiki? commented 2025-12-07 14:25:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175208892 (Comments: 2) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 80) | Bonjoue Marc, Je vais regarder ça. Charles de Carto’Cité commented 2025-12-07 14:24:27 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,170 |
| 175227599 (Comments: 1) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | \tPaaltje Leusdenhof is niet conform afspraken binnen OSM. Wellicht heb je hier iets aan hoe met namen omgegaan kan worden. Good practice https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice Probeer je er svp iets meer in te verdi... commented 2025-12-07 14:23:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175577023 (Comments: 3) | canofcatfood (Discussed changesets: 4) | This is some text from osm inspector (areas)… Old-style multipolygons Multipolygon relations with tags on the (outer) ways instead of on the relation. This is deprecated and should not be used any more. Move the tags from the outer ways... commented 2025-12-07 14:20:26 UTC by nevw ♦2,087 |
| 175448338 (Comments: 1) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | Dag Remco, name Uitrit Kazerne Zebra is geen straat naam. Al die accesstags zijn default, maar ik denk dat het beter access=private is met emergency=yes MVG eggie commented 2025-12-07 14:17:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 174496109 (Comments: 3) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 8) | I have added a note about this area to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5082201 for someone who cares about the quality of the map to investigate. commented 2025-12-07 14:15:22 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 168895562 (Comments: 1) | MacLondon (Discussed changesets: 260) | Is there a crossing island at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12980053851 ? commented 2025-12-07 14:15:08 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 175602849 (Comments: 3) | Elefant aus Wuppertal (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🙂👍 commented 2025-12-07 14:09:35 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,447 |
 | 175424594 (Comments: 2) | Renel augustin (Discussed changesets: 3) | half of the city seems to be tagged now with house number 000 or "inconnu" commented 2025-12-07 14:06:20 UTC by westnordost ♦45 |
 | 175563322 (Comments: 4) | AF HAF KARTOGRAF (Discussed changesets: 27) | Yeah, I go on it. But Prague districts is for that moment accidentally admin level 5 and not 7. I'll map other Prague districts levels too. commented 2025-12-07 14:06:14 UTC by AF HAF KARTOGRAF ♦67 |
| 174321485 (Comments: 2) | michel60 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Bonjour, Si mais il devait contenir des batiments (building) et osmose ,nétait pas content. Du coup je l'avais transformé en farmyard. Sinon il fait faire des exclusions et j'ai trouvé ça trop compliqu&eac... commented 2025-12-07 14:02:48 UTC by michel60 ♦90 |
 | 174212413 (Comments: 1) | Adrian Shobrooke (Discussed changesets: 12) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. More work is required to complete this task and ensure that it is well mapped: * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings int... commented 2025-12-07 13:54:46 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175624363 (Comments: 1) | maxim11112223 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycz... commented 2025-12-07 13:51:14 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175620322 (Comments: 1) | Bvmz (Discussed changesets: 6) | Taggt man sowas zusätzlich zum Haupteintrag? Ich hab noch "Bistro" dazu geschrieben. Aber ev. wäre noname=yes besser? commented 2025-12-07 13:49:34 UTC by coatix ♦6 |
| 175599486 (Comments: 2) | syntex (Discussed changesets: 286) | https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=175599486 - tutaj widać lepiej : ), a źródło to filmiki Awizonosza na YT. Generalnie budowa się skończyła więc już przy tej Armatniej lepiej reprezentuje teren po prostu landuse=railway. A re... commented 2025-12-07 13:49:19 UTC by syntex ♦890 |
| 175614872 (Comments: 1) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 330) | Das Sortieren von Busrouten zum Verdecken von unberechtigten Löschungen zu verwenden trage ich so nicht mit...ich erwarte die Wiederherstellung meiner destination-tags...andernfalls werde ich das hier als Vandalismus melden. Auch Busrouten nutze... commented 2025-12-07 13:34:30 UTC by bwbuz ♦58 |
| 175614777 (Comments: 1) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 330) | Wieso löscht du hier meinen destinatin-tag obwohl korrekt an den betroffenen Elementen des Kreisverkehrs eingetragen? Ich halte das für Vandalismus... commented 2025-12-07 13:29:52 UTC by bwbuz ♦58 |
| 127962974 (Comments: 2) | torger (Discussed changesets: 7) | As I said in the last of these values you commented, there was an import error for NVDB data at a period when lots of data was imported. The number is "correct", but has a tail of garbage decimals. I have rounded it to 4.8 now. If you see m... commented 2025-12-07 13:29:19 UTC by torger ♦13 |
| 172723647 (Comments: 1) | OsmIdf (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, n'hésites pas à mettre survey:date sur les objets vur sur le terrain, cela aide à retrouver ce qui n'a pas été vu depuis longtemps, surtout quand il y a un mix de source je me demande par ai... commented 2025-12-07 13:23:18 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,326 |
| 175590225 (Comments: 4) | GUFSZ (Discussed changesets: 42) | Danke commented 2025-12-07 13:21:30 UTC by GUFSZ ♦168 |
 | 175596239 (Comments: 1) | AlexTopoRO (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello, Is the left turn into Coca Cola when coming from Becicherec not a legal maneuver anymore? Based on the newly drawn geometry, this turn doesn't seem to be accounted for. Also please avoid separating directions if there is no physical se... commented 2025-12-07 12:52:57 UTC by Buraddo ♦157 |
| 174939128 (Comments: 4) | Anna-sw (Discussed changesets: 2) | Otrzymałem odpowiedź https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Zg%C5%82o%C5%9B_b%C5%82%C4%85d_w_artykule#c-DentArt-20251203140400-Grzegorz75jan-20251124095900 (trzeba wyszukać) i na wszelki wypadek cytuję "W tytule artykułu nie ma poda... commented 2025-12-07 12:52:54 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦574 |
| 174654355 (Comments: 1) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | Deze wijziging is incorrect. Bij het begin van de oprit staat alleen het bord G1 (begin autosnelweg). Dan geldt de algemene snelheid voor autosnelwegen (130 km/h). Pas op de hoofdrijbaan staat het verkeersbord A1-100. Vanaf daar geldt 100 km/h. |
| 175228428 (Comments: 1) | Remco Volger BAA (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hier ontbreekt de tag barrier=bollard bij de paaltjes. Daarnaast is de name-tag niet bedoeld voor beschrijvingen als 'Paaltjes Leksmondplein'. Ik heb het verbeterd. commented 2025-12-07 12:46:18 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,029 |
| 175596877 (Comments: 6) | m@rio (Discussed changesets: 131) | kolego, niestety ale słabo rozumiesz.. Podejrzewam, że nie widziałeś tej drogi na oczy - dlatego rekomenduję ci w pierwszej kolejności pojechać i zobaczyć, a następnie (jeśli dalej bedziesz miał wątpliwości) skontaktować się z jej Z... commented 2025-12-07 12:43:59 UTC by m@rio ♦70 |
| 175585975 (Comments: 4) | mapper999 (Discussed changesets: 113) | Danke für den Hinweis auf PTNA, das erklärt dann wohl auch das vorherige sehr inkonsistente Mapping und das bus=yes. Dir ebenso einen schönen Sonntag! commented 2025-12-07 12:39:37 UTC by mapper999 ♦382 |
 | 175607262 (Comments: 6) | Ternerebelde (Discussed changesets: 3) | @Ternerebelde. En OSM mapeamos lo que está en terreno, si el sendero existe, se mapea. Incluso si nos ponemos todos de acuerdo en borrarlo por X motivo, alguien de cualquier parte del mundo puede agregarlo sin tener nosotros mucho espacio para... commented 2025-12-07 12:37:51 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175617710 (Comments: 1) | nuroso (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ist der Weg nicht mehr vorhanden, oder vorhanden und nicht begehbar? Vorhandenes mappen wir immer und dokumentieren den passenden Tags den Zustand. Ein aufgelassener Weg, den man aber noch sehen kann könnte z.B. ein abandoned:highway... commented 2025-12-07 12:34:40 UTC by tux67 ♦2,000 |
| 175570510 (Comments: 2) | Tamani Wolf (Discussed changesets: 4) | und nicht vergessen die Übergänge/Verbindungen zu Ampeln/Verkehrsinseln einzuzeichnen, sonst sorgen diese separaten Weg für große Umwege in der Fuß- und Radfahrernavigation. commented 2025-12-07 12:33:09 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,447 |
| 175617660 (Comments: 1) | nuroso (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo nuroso, abgerisse Gebäude löschen wir üblicherweise nicht, solange diese noch auf Luftbildern oder in den ALKIS Daten zu sehen sind, damit kein anderer Mapper sie anhand dessen erneut einträgt. Stattdessen verwenden wi... commented 2025-12-07 12:28:11 UTC by tux67 ♦2,000 |
| 175616079 (Comments: 1) | Sanba1983 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее commented 2025-12-07 12:23:50 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,190 |
| 175576030 (Comments: 1) | söm4324 (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hallo söm4324, warst Du vor Ort oder arbeitest Du gerade flächendeckend alte Baustellen-Tags ab? Wenn Du vor Ort gewesen bist, hast Du anscheinend die aktuellen Bauarbeiten „übersehen“. Dort wird tatsächlich gerade ein... commented 2025-12-07 12:22:17 UTC by Svalbard ♦156 |
| 175266653 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 90) | Hi, I guess you are talking about the building here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551933154 ? I removed information from that which was duplicated on the outer way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238980439 I'm not sure what err... commented 2025-12-07 11:59:36 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦349 |
| 175618681 (Comments: 1) | Ljfsipke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-07 11:54:57 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175483591 (Comments: 3) | cartomatto (Discussed changesets: 34) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Relation:multipolygon Ciao, Andrea commented 2025-12-07 11:53:50 UTC by Andrea Musuruane ♦1,471 |
| 175600299 (Comments: 4) | Sara1000 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175604706#c1522210 commented 2025-12-07 11:48:12 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,707 |
| 175610472 (Comments: 1) | w34ver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I made some tiny adjustments. It now does show on the BTCmap with a name. https://btcmap.org/merchant/node:11276621972 Greetings, Edwin commented 2025-12-07 11:44:15 UTC by Comino ♦266 |
| 175609039 (Comments: 1) | ÐиÑ
аил Ðбанков (Discussed changesets: 1) | Расстановка кричащих надписей не поможет. Лучше расскажите как ездят в этом районе. По 04Н-900 объезжают? commented 2025-12-07 11:38:40 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,190 |
| 170345689 (Comments: 2) | stefbo_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi. Another issue. * Buildings should have their corners squared. Best regards commented 2025-12-07 11:34:53 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175597888 (Comments: 2) | Calibrator (Discussed changesets: 31) | Полностью согласен, я в курсе. Вот только я имел в виду другое, - зачем ставить level=0 для POI на 1 русском этаже в многоэтажном здании, если там... commented 2025-12-07 11:33:57 UTC by Calibrator ♦12 |
| 175612872 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 905) | Nothing wrong. Both have exactly the same meaning. Usage statistics are almost identical for both (5000 + a bit), access=employees is older and shorter. I edited this node mainly due to the note, which is unnecessary because it just repeats... commented 2025-12-07 11:33:52 UTC by mueschel ♦6,746 |
| 175602880 (Comments: 2) | paveueq (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dodawaj źródło zmian, jeśli dotyczą one rzeczy niepochodzących z dostępnej domyślnie ortofotomapy. Zwykła "wizja lokalna" lub "survey" wystarczy, jeśli zauważyłeś to naocznie w ostatnim czasie. Wiedz tylko, że ... commented 2025-12-07 11:32:12 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦319 |
| 173885454 (Comments: 2) | Babbe (Discussed changesets: 3) | Frey-Grynaeisches Institut commented 2025-12-07 11:23:47 UTC by Babbe ♦3 |
| 295594 (Comments: 3) | Ben (Discussed changesets: 4) | OK i have found the photos, but it's a photo from a long way back. It appears to be a bridge between 2 wooden fences that you climb over. I can't see more detail than that. commented 2025-12-07 11:23:31 UTC by Ben ♦3 |
| 175599053 (Comments: 2) | Calibrator (Discussed changesets: 31) | Спасибо, учту! Перепутал с детскими тренажерами на игровой площадке. :) commented 2025-12-07 11:22:08 UTC by Calibrator ♦12 |
| 175616097 (Comments: 1) | xotoxot (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-07 11:10:47 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175600789 (Comments: 1) | Артур Стрельцов (Discussed changesets: 1) | дубли поставили commented 2025-12-07 11:06:17 UTC by literan ♦6,895 |
| 175607465 (Comments: 2) | Ternerebelde (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG Revert under Ticket#2025120710000033 commented 2025-12-07 11:01:43 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,507 |
| 175616548 (Comments: 2) | Ternerebelde (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG Revert under Ticket#2025120710000033 commented 2025-12-07 11:01:32 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,507 |
| 173179881 (Comments: 3) | Stef-Cris (Discussed changesets: 4) | E usor sa spui tot felul de ineptii si sa nu ai dreptate commented 2025-12-07 10:59:51 UTC by Stef-Cris ♦1 |
| 150086264 (Comments: 1) | Michael712 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Lebe in Heinsberg stimmt so! commented 2025-12-07 10:55:58 UTC by nuroso ♦1 |
| 175610983 (Comments: 5) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hey, welcome to OSM. Just FYI, we can't use Google Maps as a source. That tends to get people pretty riled up around here. Let me know if you have questions, I'm a local editor. commented 2025-12-07 10:50:16 UTC by Omnific ♦212 |
 | 175612406 (Comments: 1) | Michael_NZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. In this edit, you changed a 'Minor Road' to a 'Service Road', but this doesn't affect public access - it just affects the importance of the road. If you want to mark this road as private, ... commented 2025-12-07 10:30:26 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦426 |
| 175454921 (Comments: 2) | ManychShipCanal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ooops, ignore my previous comment. The map wasn't yet updated for me. commented 2025-12-07 10:27:02 UTC by foreigner037 ♦70 |
 | 174667997 (Comments: 4) | cpof-tea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi again, As I can see I've finished experimenting, but the last variand doesn't look like proper approach in my opinion https://prnt.sc/JYAe8_33GyRF Also there are kept number of broken restrictions supposedly left after prev... commented 2025-12-07 10:25:10 UTC by evgenykatyshev ♦216 |
| 174418624 (Comments: 3) | AurélienQ (Discussed changesets: 60) | A mon avis c'est un ancien étang qui a été asséché/canalisé afin d'alimenter les aménagements de center parcs et/ou protéger l'autoroute d'inondations. On voit un ru au milie... commented 2025-12-07 10:15:52 UTC by MathGon ♦3 |
 | 175595056 (Comments: 3) | 市川ゆり子 (Discussed changesets: 3) | You can use* commented 2025-12-07 10:07:19 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦319 |
| 175615414 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 121) | Działka pomiędzy dworcami jest prywatna, pod biurowiec. W wątku na SSC gdzieś przewinęła się nazwa firmy. commented 2025-12-07 10:04:19 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦319 |
 | 175483942 (Comments: 1) | STV87 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hej Simon, Det er ikke for at pege fingre eller noget omkring din sletning af området. Data på OSM er sikkert kommet fra SDFE 25 kortet. Derfor tror jeg, at du også skal en tur forbi Klimastyrelsen, som har tegnet omr&... commented 2025-12-07 10:00:31 UTC by b-holdet ♦337 |
| 175615068 (Comments: 1) | Dokgurte (Discussed changesets: 2) | Added information on knowledge of local conditions commented 2025-12-07 09:40:39 UTC by Dokgurte ♦2 |
| 175614297 (Comments: 1) | forcella (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao forcella, ho visto che hai richiesto che qualcuno controllasse le modifiche. Innanzitutto grazie per le tue modifiche, ogni contributo è prezioso. Io avrei solo mappato il cartello dove è realmente presente (a sinis... commented 2025-12-07 09:39:10 UTC by ivanbranco ♦2,798 |
| 175572371 (Comments: 2) | Fedde89 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Beste Fedde89, Is dit een winkel waar mensen naar binnen kunnen lopen? Waar heb je deze naam op gebaseerd? Deze naam kan ik niet terug vinden op de website. Met vriendelijke groet, Tjuro commented 2025-12-07 09:33:40 UTC by Tjuro ♦237 |
| 175598323 (Comments: 3) | Cat2006 (Discussed changesets: 13) | OK, so it's a vacant shop now. I reverted the deletion and added a disused: prefix. In this way, the history of the node is preserved, if it opens again it's easily restored, and editors like StreetComplete will highlight it every now and t... commented 2025-12-07 09:21:41 UTC by rhhs ♦160 |
| 175547818 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted since maxheight was applied to too long segment and unnecessary split was made #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175614340 commented 2025-12-07 09:16:31 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
 | 175358540 (Comments: 1) | LFOD (Discussed changesets: 2) | Walked by the area today, park is now open and in use too the public. commented 2025-12-07 09:11:53 UTC by LFOD ♦2 |
| 172478718 (Comments: 3) | kam_te12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for sharing the details related to your visit. It was helpful. commented 2025-12-07 09:00:38 UTC by kam_te12 ♦1 |
| 171728646 (Comments: 4) | Pink Duck (Discussed changesets: 43) | Agreed, done. commented 2025-12-07 08:58:01 UTC by Pink Duck ♦164 |
| 173998198 (Comments: 3) | theDM (Discussed changesets: 133) | Polish definition of trunk roads has changed recently. Please check Polish version of Wiki page for more information https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk commented 2025-12-07 08:57:57 UTC by Yunkers ♦402 |
| 175613418 (Comments: 1) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Extra part of the descripton: Been here many times, it's a road commented 2025-12-07 08:55:59 UTC by JasiahMaps1010 ♦2 |
| 175445897 (Comments: 5) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 28) | That's the wiki for you. However, I was right about no unit being an increase in ambiguity for the casual mapper. With time, someone will inevitably come along and add the ' km/h' back in by bot. Essentially, was just questioning the n... commented 2025-12-07 08:51:02 UTC by Pink Duck ♦164 |
| 151763983 (Comments: 1) | Rom1 (Discussed changesets: 64) | Hello, Est ce que ce chemin est vraiment un sentier équestre ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144736217/history Jean-Baptiste commented 2025-12-07 08:42:27 UTC by jbcharron ♦147 |
| 175583962 (Comments: 3) | schabanel (Discussed changesets: 19) | Merci :) commented 2025-12-07 08:39:55 UTC by Syl ♦1,010 |
 | 175387362 (Comments: 2) | 홍은기 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175393117 commented 2025-12-07 08:35:38 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,707 |
| 175576454 (Comments: 4) | Akira4755 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok understood. Thank you so much for sharing the tool. I'll keep this in mind. commented 2025-12-07 08:34:56 UTC by Akira4755 ♦1 |
| 175344030 (Comments: 2) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hi, I'm sorry to hear that my edits broke something. I was trying to update the RTD line relations to reflect the service changes post-pandemic, but it seems as if I may have unintentionally broken a lot of stuff. Please feel free to revert all ... commented 2025-12-07 08:34:13 UTC by OrdinaryScarlett ♦15 |
 | 175555255 (Comments: 1) | devamsx (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175613193 where the comment is: "Remove testdata" commented 2025-12-07 08:32:58 UTC by NeisRevert ♦364 |
| 175555230 (Comments: 1) | devamsx (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175613179 where the comment is: "Remove testdata" commented 2025-12-07 08:32:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦364 |
| 175611110 (Comments: 1) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. This changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks. Best regards, Pascal commented 2025-12-07 08:32:05 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,707 |
| 175583481 (Comments: 3) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 905) | Thank you for your response. I understand the reasoning. Regarding the discrepancy with the Wiki, I'll consult with the Japanese community about it. commented 2025-12-07 08:29:35 UTC by kudomenagi ♦4 |
| 175611903 (Comments: 1) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, welcome to OSM. This changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks. Best regards, Pascal commented 2025-12-07 08:29:12 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,707 |
| X | 175612771 (Comments: 2) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Already mapped, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900 commented 2025-12-07 08:28:34 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,707 |
| 175603260 (Comments: 1) | Julianna123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175612942 where the comment is: "Remove vandalism" commented 2025-12-07 08:24:33 UTC by NeisRevert ♦364 |
| 175591365 (Comments: 1) | VitoVejnović (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted since restriction was not set in the full extent of York road east end and unnecessary split was made #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175612773 commented 2025-12-07 08:15:23 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175041252 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM15 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Здравсвуйте. Поняла ошибку,исправлюсь commented 2025-12-07 08:11:45 UTC by Ozon OSM15 ♦4 |
| 175589201 (Comments: 1) | VitoVejnović (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removing accidental node creation #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175612533 commented 2025-12-07 08:04:01 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 6557732 (Comments: 3) | MHolz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ok, thanks. I changed so. commented 2025-12-07 07:57:31 UTC by Tomas_J ♦313 |
| 175593637 (Comments: 2) | Wiki-Wiki (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je bijdrage heb ik verwijderd. De club staat hier al getagd op de adresnode. clubhuistag toegevoegd. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-07 07:53:39 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175582698 (Comments: 1) | Sara1000 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo, wieso wurde der Name auf "1" geändert? Grüße commented 2025-12-07 07:48:32 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,707 |
| 175589493 (Comments: 2) | NeisReview (Discussed changesets: 4) | Vielen Dank für den Kommentar. Ich habe keine Ahnung, was dieser mit dem Changeset hier zu tun hat. Viele Grüße, Pascal commented 2025-12-07 07:43:12 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,707 |
| 167626839 (Comments: 1) | mirada81 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, für diesen Punkt habe ich in Karten keinen Namen gefunden. Bitte beachten https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Gruß L commented 2025-12-07 07:38:09 UTC by Lokai ♦484 |
| 175605771 (Comments: 1) | TobyTot (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Review requested) That looks fine, thanks for updating it. commented 2025-12-07 07:33:29 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 175580298 (Comments: 1) | efec0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. Sildiğiniz yollar uydu görüntülerinde görünüyor. Neden sildiniz? commented 2025-12-07 07:06:57 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦176 |
| 175604156 (Comments: 2) | Jrrs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zou het voorlopig zo laten en kijken wat de navigatie er mee doet. De updates van je routingapp kunnen even duren. Geen idee hoe lang. commented 2025-12-07 06:58:47 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
 | 175441744 (Comments: 2) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 109) | Olá Daniel Agos, Obrigado pela correção. O primeiro foi um lapso; o segundo, um erro. Alterações já realizadas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175611007#map=19/38.785485/-9.18... commented 2025-12-07 06:54:10 UTC by Reino Baptista ♦107 |
| 150000453 (Comments: 1) | Landry GAIFFE (Discussed changesets: 18) | De ma lecture du wiki, je comprends que la clé species doit contenir le nom binomial de l'espèce, et pas uniquement la seconde partie de celui-ci. Est-ce une erreur de ma part ? commented 2025-12-07 06:49:00 UTC by Lejun ♦503 |
| 175582185 (Comments: 1) | Irish_Conor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456389491/ In general, if a highway=* only leads to farmland, forestry, a bog or quarry, and has NO utility for the general public, it gets mapped highway=track. If it leads to an individual farm o... commented 2025-12-07 06:48:28 UTC by VictorIE ♦973 |
| 175601167 (Comments: 2) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, From the website:- https://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/bellevue-south-park/facilities/dogareas, it looks like leashed dogs are allowed in the park but not in play areas. Imagery suggests the playground area is still a playground. commented 2025-12-07 06:47:24 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,011 |
| 175587384 (Comments: 1) | Macun (Discussed changesets: 1) | Merhaba. OpenStreetMap'e katkı sağlarken önemli olan, eklenen verilerin rendererlarda güzel görünmesi değildir. Verinin doğruluğu önemlidir. Lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#... commented 2025-12-07 06:44:14 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦176 |
| 175468654 (Comments: 5) | Feskil (Discussed changesets: 67) | Jeszcze stoją, ale są w trakcie rozbiórki tj. połowa budynku jest rozebrana do szkieletu commented 2025-12-07 06:34:40 UTC by Feskil ♦28 |
| 174972076 (Comments: 1) | Akiba220 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, unless the bench is known as "Bench" you don't need to tag "name=Bench" The name key is used for the name of the feature as it is called, for example a bench could be called John Memorial's Bench. ht... commented 2025-12-07 05:54:10 UTC by akadouri ♦60 |
| 118387937 (Comments: 3) | h551w (Discussed changesets: 64) | shop=trade trade=plumbing_supplies ? commented 2025-12-07 05:46:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 171562716 (Comments: 1) | Dzertanoj (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please avoid using multipolygons unless they are really necessary. They make features harder to edit and in this case they provide no benefit. commented 2025-12-07 05:37:16 UTC by tguen ♦88 |
| 175554264 (Comments: 6) | TMil31 (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's more like the validator doesn't really highlight that error very well. commented 2025-12-07 05:23:11 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
 | 46981940 (Comments: 2) | karl jayson ferrer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Found you other viewpoints. seems to be related to a run? Saw a Finishline. Since many others have been deleted, I'll just delete these viewpoints. Cheers, Totor commented 2025-12-07 04:51:39 UTC by Totor ♦70 |
| 175606245 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. Color values in OSM should in lower case. In general in OSM other than proper names and a few other exceptions, all tag values should be lower case. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... commented 2025-12-07 04:40:44 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175600040 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. While your edit is not wrong, generally if a feature has a wikidata= tag then wikipedia= tag is unnecessary since it can be extracted from wikidata. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.or... commented 2025-12-07 04:34:42 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 80761377 (Comments: 1) | IvanUK18 (Discussed changesets: 6) | residential_entrance is not a supported tag. You may use entrance=* and assign ref oder addr-tags to the entrances. Thank you. commented 2025-12-07 04:32:09 UTC by opendcc ♦1,552 |
| 175597018 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. In this edit you moved a library node a few buildings over. Was that intentional? Also it looks like you tagged what appears to be an apartment building as a single-family house. Could you please elaborate on this change? ... commented 2025-12-07 04:30:30 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175596128 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | If you think that somebody needs to be fixed about a feature that you can't, rather than using note= tag, it's better to use fixme= tag. If you'd like you can try using https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ to generate opening_hours t... commented 2025-12-07 04:28:12 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 22122165 (Comments: 1) | SK53 (Discussed changesets: 171) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164627765/history has shop = builders_merchant that was added in this edit shop=builders_merchant ? Is it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=doityourself or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag... commented 2025-12-07 04:22:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 166786171 (Comments: 1) | Tallguy (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12864977546/history has shop = builders_merchant that was added in this edit shop=builders_merchant ? Is it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=doityourself or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/... commented 2025-12-07 04:22:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
 | 175410763 (Comments: 1) | FajrAl (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi FajrAI Could you share what is your source for these edits? Thank you! commented 2025-12-07 04:19:53 UTC by B972025 ♦25 |
| 175592369 (Comments: 2) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Also while you cleaned up biz tags from the building itself, you left opening_hours= tag on it, which obviously is not necessary for an apartment building. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... commented 2025-12-07 04:19:34 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175514011 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. When adding facebbok info it's sufficient to use just 1 tag. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175514011 commented 2025-12-07 04:12:54 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175513391 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. You can tag this as a vacant business or use lifecycle prefix until the new biz opens. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175513391 commented 2025-12-07 04:11:47 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 143644830 (Comments: 3) | TrailRunnerBW (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks! commented 2025-12-07 04:11:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 174708804 (Comments: 2) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Changeset reverted to restore this POI. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175608699 commented 2025-12-07 04:05:17 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175608651 (Comments: 1) | Totor (Discussed changesets: 3) | I believe it does not make sense to add fixme=name to every highway by default, since the need for a neam is implied.... It is useful however to add the tag to a few streets where the name is missing in an otherwise completely named area... commented 2025-12-07 04:04:28 UTC by Totor ♦70 |
| 175132721 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. Rather than delivery=partner, it's more correct to use delivery=yes and delivery:partner=* as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:delivery:partner --- Published using OSMC... commented 2025-12-07 04:00:01 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 172793172 (Comments: 2) | manjurawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 7) | Fixed commented 2025-12-07 03:59:10 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,138 |
| 174708996 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. Rather than using shop=vacant, it's better to use "disused:" lifecycle prefix as documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix While your change is not outright wrong, there are some that consider sho... commented 2025-12-07 03:54:52 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 173925905 (Comments: 2) | Ansofter (Discussed changesets: 4) | Falsch angelegte Sackgassen wurden in Changeset 175608359 wieder entfernt commented 2025-12-07 03:42:37 UTC by Ansofter ♦5 |
| 175568804 (Comments: 1) | masonthemapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome! try to briefly describe what you are updating in the change-set comment something like "added address tags" commented 2025-12-07 03:09:36 UTC by Fen <3 ♦8 |
| 131151519 (Comments: 4) | surveyor54 (Discussed changesets: 141) | (depending on what you want you may just retag this one or also document it at wiki - I can help if you are unsure how - or go through entire https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process ) commented 2025-12-07 03:07:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
 | 171606124 (Comments: 1) | ToprakM (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257935589/history has building = hutq that was added in this edit building=hutq ? Maybe intention was to use building=hut and then square area? commented 2025-12-07 03:05:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 169796002 (Comments: 1) | Maradona11 (Discussed changesets: 57) | I can't find any signage or markings on the ground indicating https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470076706 is for bicycles, I would need to survey again though in case there is a sign at one of the entrances commented 2025-12-07 03:02:28 UTC by aharvey ♦1,894 |
| 175535292 (Comments: 4) | Skylark_H_C (Discussed changesets: 5) | As `=yard` has become a conventional practice nationwide, just let it be. I'll take your options for the other two points. 既然“yard”已成为全国性的惯例，就让它这样吧。 我会采纳你关于另外两点... commented 2025-12-07 02:59:21 UTC by Skylark_H_C ♦17 |
| 175607816 (Comments: 1) | pootriarch (Discussed changesets: 33) | it's not clear to me whether we remove the street entirely, but i opted for just access:no for now. there are no street markings, just bollards. i didn't take note of whether the two blocks on the larkin side exist commented 2025-12-07 02:48:28 UTC by pootriarch ♦26 |
| 175607545 (Comments: 1) | Eduardo17172 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Corrijo, es la página 282 commented 2025-12-07 02:30:22 UTC by Eduardo17172 ♦4 |
| 143916639 (Comments: 1) | smarties (Discussed changesets: 92) | Hallo, ich habe diese Löschung des unterirdischen Burgmühlengrabens <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574433046> im Bereich des Pumpwerks Inselwall rückgängig gemacht. Der Graben wird tatsächlich unterirdisch gedoppelt... commented 2025-12-07 02:16:47 UTC by rohieb ♦128 |
| 175593056 (Comments: 2) | Amfnziw (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19123 commented 2025-12-07 02:12:23 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175582980 (Comments: 2) | lucas1960 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lucas1960 commented 2025-12-07 02:07:40 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175499154 (Comments: 1) | MSCymz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello MSCymz, could you please explain the intention of this changeset? There is no tram in Hamburg. commented 2025-12-07 01:29:06 UTC by kadiwa ♦50 |
 | 174131470 (Comments: 1) | Bobolo Hilliary (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Bobolo Hilliary! Welcome to OpenStreetMap :) I just want to give you a few words of advice - You don't need to name the buildings with what they are, because this can be shown through the other tags. - You can show if buil... commented 2025-12-07 00:53:43 UTC by ceirios ♦73 |
| 155530230 (Comments: 5) | Erelen (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hopefully fixed in 175606339. Let's wait for the next OMaps release. commented 2025-12-07 00:50:34 UTC by Erelen ♦82 |
| 175592386 (Comments: 1) | Amfnziw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175605765 commented 2025-12-07 00:06:06 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175592951 (Comments: 1) | Amfnziw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175605756 commented 2025-12-07 00:05:43 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 59365356 (Comments: 1) | Doug777 (Discussed changesets: 8) | This node is seriously in the wrong place. Was the restaurant really on the corner of Washington and Washington Court in May of 2018? I have moved it to the actual location based on on-the-ground survey. commented 2025-12-06 23:57:04 UTC by gdt ♦51 |
| 175522880 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 119) | Since this is such a short section and these are only minor informal at-grade track road connections, mostly made by by maintenance vehicles, off road vehicles, and traffic trying to take shortcuts from the frontage roads, I think leaving it as motor... commented 2025-12-06 23:53:35 UTC by Joseph R P ♦383 |
| 174997736 (Comments: 3) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 11) | When someone comments on any of your changesets, you should almost always respond, even if that answer might be "I don't know" - or if you fixed the mistakes yourself, as it helps prevent further issues on OSM and builds trust with oth... commented 2025-12-06 23:45:47 UTC by Frank Peng ♦46 |
| 36701868 (Comments: 4) | richlv (Discussed changesets: 40) | Oh, haha, that's... 10 years ago :) Looking at my pics from that area, I visited the place on 2016-01-17. This changeset was on 2016-01-20. In the pics, I can see an infoboard there, but I cannot find a pic with infoboard contents. I mu... commented 2025-12-06 23:39:12 UTC by richlv ♦406 |
| 175573595 (Comments: 3) | InfosecSnipe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the quick reply.. Yes, I saw that you are relatively new to OSM. I don't want to discourage you from continuing with OSM if you enjoy it. You are by no means the only one who has used the horse_riding tag for other things, example: ht... commented 2025-12-06 23:34:51 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦854 |
| 175604361 (Comments: 1) | zbh0170 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Erratum : à lire Griottier et non Grottier commented 2025-12-06 23:23:19 UTC by zbh0170 ♦3 |
| 175603280 (Comments: 1) | zbh0170 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Erratum : à lire Griottier et non Grottier commented 2025-12-06 23:20:11 UTC by zbh0170 ♦3 |
| 119350356 (Comments: 1) | Skunkman56 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hi, i think there are some leftover untagged lanes that are not in relations from this change but I'm not sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175604607 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175604426 commented 2025-12-06 23:13:02 UTC by tuttiton ♦28 |
| 175522966 (Comments: 4) | Jrrs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hoi.. Eigenlijk zou je een berichtje kunnen sturen naar die app bouwer. Zou die naar motorcycle kijken? Die zou zich aan het routeringsprincipe van osm 'moeten' confirmeren. Maar goed... kwaad kan het niet.. want bij c12 hoort mope... commented 2025-12-06 23:09:47 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175350199 (Comments: 7) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 105) | Nie no, jest dobrze - DK61 tam jest, bo w drugą stronę musi być DK61 (nie ma bezpośredniej łącznicy) commented 2025-12-06 23:07:51 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦822 |
| 175600747 (Comments: 1) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 156) | *[..., Mapbox] (not sure what imagery it is) commented 2025-12-06 23:02:31 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦704 |
| 175600645 (Comments: 1) | Pruszków88 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19121 commented 2025-12-06 23:01:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 131639216 (Comments: 1) | David_RF (Discussed changesets: 7) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7336754817 quelle source te fait penser que la borne tri-standard n'a plus de combo css ? Cordialement, Marc commented 2025-12-06 22:57:17 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,326 |
| 166754802 (Comments: 2) | DurgeshSinghChouhan (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi, thank you very much, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12863526578/history is edited and added tags as you suggested. I will upgrade tags in nearby fruit stalls as well, thank you for pointing out my mistake commented 2025-12-06 22:52:26 UTC by DurgeshSinghChouhan ♦17 |
| 174832383 (Comments: 2) | LySioS (Discussed changesets: 24) | Merci de ta vigilance commented 2025-12-06 22:50:44 UTC by LySioS ♦136 |
| 175376401 (Comments: 8) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 194) | Pruszków88 to konto trolla Temat-Droga, na forum został już zablokowany za obchodzenie blokady. commented 2025-12-06 22:34:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175595861 (Comments: 3) | MB_UA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, das ist ein bisschen tricky. Ist es ein unterirdischer Tank mit offenem Schacht, d. h. die Entnahme geschieht mit Saugkorb, wäre es nur emergency=water_tank. Ist der Anschluss fest verrohrt, wäre das emergency=fire_hydrant m... commented 2025-12-06 22:16:57 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
| 162189702 (Comments: 2) | K_D_R (Discussed changesets: 1) | I mean this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049366884/history/18 commented 2025-12-06 22:15:04 UTC by tuttiton ♦28 |
| 175601541 (Comments: 1) | MB_UA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, danke dir, das sieht gut aus. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-06 22:12:26 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
| 146819598 (Comments: 1) | Tomas_J (Discussed changesets: 64) | Zdravim, preco posun bodu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/205261324 o taky kus na vychod? Javi sa mi, ze sa cesty zbiehaju skor a povodna poloha bola lepsia. commented 2025-12-06 22:06:51 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,746 |
| 175337667 (Comments: 1) | Dx10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175602975 commented 2025-12-06 22:01:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175337424 (Comments: 1) | Dx10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175602975 commented 2025-12-06 22:01:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175353384 (Comments: 2) | Dx10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please seehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19120 commented 2025-12-06 21:50:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175602106 (Comments: 1) | WMietek (Discussed changesets: 36) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-12-06 21:41:15 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175601418 (Comments: 1) | normchell (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее и та... commented 2025-12-06 21:36:23 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,190 |
| 175210072 (Comments: 1) | NikoJorj (Discussed changesets: 12) | 🤩 commented 2025-12-06 21:35:49 UTC by stillhart ♦171 |
| 175461313 (Comments: 1) | NikoJorj (Discussed changesets: 12) | 🤩🤩🤩 Beautiful, perfectly mapped and so fast. Thanks! commented 2025-12-06 21:35:18 UTC by stillhart ♦171 |
| 157581010 (Comments: 2) | Bastianowitz (Discussed changesets: 18) | Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point man könnte gar die einzelnen Säulen mappen. commented 2025-12-06 21:34:33 UTC by stillhart ♦171 |
| 175597905 (Comments: 1) | Thomasschönwalde (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo Thomas, Ah... Feuerwehr... Immer gut! Das ist deine erste Bearbeitung... Darum hierzu speziell auch Tips und Links... Schau dir mal folgendes an: http://www.openfiremap.de/?zoom=12&lat=51.93861&lon=13.95241&lay... commented 2025-12-06 21:21:30 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,106 |
| 175581415 (Comments: 2) | MB_UA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, das mit dem Ref hab ich mir bei den andern Orten angeschaut und die klare Beschriftung. Danke für die Info mit den Anschlüssen. Gruß commented 2025-12-06 21:19:37 UTC by MB_UA ♦3 |
| 175565255 (Comments: 2) | MB_UA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, Danke für den Hinweis. Das eine ist nur eine Saugstelle, als HInweis, dass hier der Zugang zum Bach gut gewährleistet ist. Habe hoffentlich beides korrigert. Gruß commented 2025-12-06 21:15:58 UTC by MB_UA ♦3 |
| 175548358 (Comments: 3) | janiec67 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ulica Objazdowa jest lepszym wyborem tylko w relacji Brzeg/Oborniki -> Wińsko i na odwrót, w pozostałych Rawicka ma więcej sensu. Teoretycznie można by było przywrócić tam secondary ale moim zdaniem to za małe miasto na takie ... commented 2025-12-06 21:13:59 UTC by janiec67 ♦1 |
| 175355800 (Comments: 1) | Superstore Media (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just having a quick look at this, edit looks grat. commented 2025-12-06 21:07:05 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
| 175501278 (Comments: 1) | thopf (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi, I noticed that the segment of Fichtestraße 71–75 was changed to pedestrian-only. Emergency vehicles are allowed on this road, and contractors are allowed in special circumstances. The surface is paved and wide enough for a car. |
 | 175593750 (Comments: 1) | njmccarthy11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi @njmccarthy11 . Welcome to OSM! You asked for review - the road looks good to me. It's hard to see through the trees on aerial imagery and you anticipated well where it runs. Good job. I see you are adding this as part of a HOT... commented 2025-12-06 20:59:12 UTC by aki007 ♦12 |
 | 170169434 (Comments: 3) | Kosti_Lajos (Discussed changesets: 1) | A Lomexes épület esetében az eredeti címkézés annyiban volt jobb, hogy maga az épület megmaradt (és így aki mondjuk lejárt szavatosságú légifelvételr... commented 2025-12-06 20:56:13 UTC by ha5vsa ♦7 |
| 175400807 (Comments: 3) | Landkreis Prignitz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hei, ich noch mal... ich hab mir das mit euren Daten nochmal in Ruhe angeschaut... https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/4605c26759e84658844c53ec7ef6d6d9?draft=true#widget_6=active_datasource_id:dataSource_2,center:1356494.19119167%2C7010237.65737... commented 2025-12-06 20:55:11 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,106 |
| 175520375 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted because of unnecessary splits and restrictions set on part of the way not covered by a traffic sign #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175600849 commented 2025-12-06 20:52:05 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175519147 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverting west side of Sherwood Forest Road edit since split was done at the wrong crossroad #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175600107 commented 2025-12-06 20:26:26 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 174934917 (Comments: 2) | BenBoss69 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, du hast barrier=city_wall auf dem landuse=residential hinzugefügt, das kann nicht stimmen. Ich hab es wieder entfernt. commented 2025-12-06 20:20:25 UTC by CaptainCrunch ♦26 |
| 175517628 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverting since split was not done at the crossroad #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175599679 commented 2025-12-06 20:10:33 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
 | 175434034 (Comments: 8) | Cypp0847 (Discussed changesets: 24) | 1. It's not "a" project, but many 2. The project, individual projects would include the improvements only, not the pre-existing and unchanged sections 3. OSM doesn't track construction project management either. That belon... commented 2025-12-06 20:00:41 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,677 |
| 175349404 (Comments: 3) | Fazu (Discussed changesets: 21) | Ilyen helyekre megfordulás tiltást rakni felesleges, útvonaltervezőknek az út típusából illene kitalálni, hogy egypályás úton meg lehet-e fordulni. Illetve mivel el... commented 2025-12-06 20:00:34 UTC by infeeeee ♦616 |
| 175598187 (Comments: 1) | tansu_bla (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I saw you requested a review for this changeset. The edit looks good. But since you have traced on aerial imagery, I imagine that you aware that you did not draw the real outline of the building but only a probable outline, whic... commented 2025-12-06 19:49:27 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,663 |
| 175591121 (Comments: 1) | tansu_bla (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/349277440/history "La boite aux lettres rouge de bpost n'existe plus, donc j'ai réutilisé le POI pour un arbre" That looks smarts but… it is not recommen... commented 2025-12-06 19:47:59 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,663 |
| 175405116 (Comments: 2) | benguuuuu (Discussed changesets: 1) | I was using it to close out the line. Still new at this - relax. commented 2025-12-06 19:47:02 UTC by benguuuuu ♦1 |
| 175571583 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:46:09 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175571547 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:46:03 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175571523 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:58 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175571502 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:53 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175571481 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:46 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175571471 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:39 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175571452 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:32 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175571443 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:24 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175571424 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:19 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175571409 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:15 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175571365 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:45:09 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175571334 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:44:49 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175571213 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:44:38 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175571086 (Comments: 1) | ryosir61 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-06 19:44:32 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175568502 (Comments: 1) | klasterosm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zestaw zmian nieprawidłowy, wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175598882 commented 2025-12-06 19:38:06 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175568500 (Comments: 1) | klasterosm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zestaw zmian nieprawidłowy, wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175598861 commented 2025-12-06 19:37:34 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175568498 (Comments: 1) | klasterosm (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zestaw zmian nieprawidłowy, wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175598840 commented 2025-12-06 19:36:41 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175558785 (Comments: 2) | Dimitar155 (Discussed changesets: 122) | Защото беше малко глупаво и очакваше всяка локация да има от всички цветове. Вече е коригирано. commented 2025-12-06 19:34:45 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦750 |
| 174297077 (Comments: 1) | Steve_NC60 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Steve, Thanks for contributing to golf course mapping. We need all the help we can get. However, there are some problems with how you're mapping and I want to make sure you correct those behaviors so they don't continue int... commented 2025-12-06 19:21:12 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 175598074 (Comments: 1) | map_improver_xyz (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello, my changes (work of more than an hour) from just before got lost. I assume they are in the previous version. How can I reverse this here? commented 2025-12-06 19:20:50 UTC by map_improver_xyz ♦5 |
| 160019797 (Comments: 3) | wambacher (Discussed changesets: 115) | fixed. btw: no idea why that happend commented 2025-12-06 19:17:36 UTC by wambacher ♦437 |
| 175591484 (Comments: 1) | wombatmaper (Discussed changesets: 39) | thx for that as well commented 2025-12-06 19:17:28 UTC by Yog Sot ♦368 |
 | 174515089 (Comments: 1) | NFZANMNIM (Discussed changesets: 151) | Откуда информация то, что улицу Янги Узбекистан переименовали в Янги Ташкент?? commented 2025-12-06 19:17:14 UTC by FUZZY_42 ♦22 |
| 175591485 (Comments: 1) | wombatmaper (Discussed changesets: 39) | thx for that commented 2025-12-06 19:17:08 UTC by Yog Sot ♦368 |
| 175596391 (Comments: 1) | WMietek (Discussed changesets: 36) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/911467867 https://www.open... commented 2025-12-06 19:12:47 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175415246 (Comments: 1) | stevethomp (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Steve, Thanks for contributing to golf course mapping. We need all the help we can get. However, there are some problems with how you're mapping and I want to make sure you correct those behaviors so they don't continue int... commented 2025-12-06 19:04:52 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 152039297 (Comments: 2) | fuggy (Discussed changesets: 2) | И здесь тоже: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288064720 commented 2025-12-06 19:03:16 UTC by mike140 ♦356 |
| 175549273 (Comments: 1) | MB_UA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo, hier passt etwas noch nicht ganz. Statt emergency=saugstelle_günz müsste es emergency=suction_point sein. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-06 18:59:44 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
| 175540633 (Comments: 1) | MB_UA (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Eine Anmerkung zum Feld „ref“: Dies dient ausschließlich der Hydrantennummer, die oben rechts auf dem Hydrantenschild ggf. ausgewiesen ist. Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag u... commented 2025-12-06 18:56:20 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
| 175064989 (Comments: 1) | zamekzamek (Discussed changesets: 8) | Panie usunąłeś Pan junction = roundabout z ronda commented 2025-12-06 18:49:44 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 169678882 (Comments: 4) | SteMue (Discussed changesets: 13) | (fmc_1 bin ich auch, entschuldige bitte das Posten mit dem anderen account) commented 2025-12-06 18:47:12 UTC by fmc_1 ♦10 |
| 175153193 (Comments: 1) | zamekzamek (Discussed changesets: 8) | jak dodajesz relację to proszę zwracaj uwagę na tagi na rondach, bo usuwasz junction=roundabout commented 2025-12-06 18:33:49 UTC by puchaczowsky ♦153 |
| 175570570 (Comments: 2) | one_electro_dan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Salut. Ce era în Centrul Vechi se numea tagging for the renderer. O singură clădire din realitate era cartografiată din mai multe ways cu tag-ul „building”. În multe cazuri nici nu exista un "building" care... commented 2025-12-06 18:24:30 UTC by one_electro_dan ♦4 |
| 164690846 (Comments: 2) | Maps Man (Discussed changesets: 49) | Or... mention https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Oberaffe to help? It seems that most of the powerlines were created by him, and he is an expert in this field. commented 2025-12-06 18:19:12 UTC by Skylark_H_C ♦17 |
| 146323161 (Comments: 2) | Muad_Dib (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello. Thank you. It was a mistake. commented 2025-12-06 18:04:47 UTC by Muad_Dib ♦3 |
| 175258409 (Comments: 4) | Autopistero20502020 (Discussed changesets: 37) | @Hugoren, gracias por revertir y recuperar la relación que había modificado anteriormente. Lo puse de forma provisional porque no sabía quien debería de recurrir para corregir. @MarinoBM, Wikimedia no se arregla, Op... commented 2025-12-06 17:51:16 UTC by Autopistero20502020 ♦34 |
| 175595227 (Comments: 1) | bbqman (Discussed changesets: 40) | also source: https://boringdonhall.co.uk/ and Wikipedia/Wikidata commented 2025-12-06 17:44:05 UTC by bbqman ♦34 |
| 175447464 (Comments: 3) | outgoing-owl-homer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay, good! I was going to suggest moving it physically too, but you figured that out already. Good job :) commented 2025-12-06 17:36:12 UTC by Sakari_N ♦99 |
| 156721845 (Comments: 2) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 283) | Hello, I found also shop=tractor. I think this tag is better. commented 2025-12-06 17:35:48 UTC by mapperue ♦232 |
| 146263214 (Comments: 1) | CjMalone (Discussed changesets: 111) | I'm not sure about the name change here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/54.518700/-1.502995 from "Morton Park Beefeater" to "Morton Park" The latter is the branch name used on the website, but... commented 2025-12-06 17:28:44 UTC by phodgkin ♦73 |
| 175590017 (Comments: 2) | TheNet1996 (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi, yes, many thanks for this great tool! The main reason for my single CS is to avoid a CS across the entire city of Berlin - i prefer local ones. I'm also dbl check the mapped phone numbers in OSM with the phone numbers from the Websi... commented 2025-12-06 17:19:01 UTC by TheNet1996 ♦177 |
| 175447146 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 283) | Čau mapperue, předtím než uděláš revert, protože máš podezření na kopírování z Google Maps,bi bylo nejlepší nejdřív napsat autorovi a zjistit jestli to je doop... commented 2025-12-06 17:16:17 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦325 |
| 174209597 (Comments: 3) | SteMue (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ganz sicher nicht wegen fehlender lit=no, Aber lassen wirs gut sein. commented 2025-12-06 17:15:33 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,447 |
| 175593571 (Comments: 2) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Ah, okay. Dann reverte ich die Ergänzungen. commented 2025-12-06 17:14:31 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦41 |
| 148665003 (Comments: 1) | TWHB (Discussed changesets: 60) | Hi, could you give some references about this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262727168) power plant? I have searched on Internet and official documents and I cannot find any information. Regards commented 2025-12-06 17:14:20 UTC by kapazao ♦950 |
| 175447159 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 283) | Hi, how do you know the other user copied data from GMaps of the edit was only to delete a duplicate POI? commented 2025-12-06 17:10:16 UTC by Mannivu ♦247 |
| 175590754 (Comments: 1) | XExplor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-06 17:02:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 174453723 (Comments: 1) | dcbm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hei, ...nur zur Info: da gibt es auch eine Note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4864943 Wenn du es einschätzt, kannst du die ja schließen... Sven commented 2025-12-06 16:59:10 UTC by streckenkundler ♦1,106 |
| 175553363 (Comments: 1) | Rdeipenau (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola Rdeipenau, le envié mensaje por privado y ahora por acá, usted hizo una eliminación masiva de calles y que otros usuarios tuvieron que revertir sus cambios, le vuelvo a decir lo mismo que en el mensaje anterior, antes de bor... commented 2025-12-06 16:42:33 UTC by serock ♦77 |
| 175410402 (Comments: 10) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 44) | Richard: The issue here is not footpaths or public rights of way where a landowner may or may not permit cycling, but pavements where cycling is prohibited by law. You claim that cycle routers will not send cyclists along footways by choice - ... commented 2025-12-06 16:35:28 UTC by Pete Owens ♦73 |
| 172425512 (Comments: 1) | avsdyvwaoebmeahos (Discussed changesets: 5) | 안녕하세요, 편집하신 내용을 보고 몇몇 중요한 내용을 말씀드리고자 합니다. 1. 공사 중인 시설/단지는 '공사 중인 지역'을 사용해 나타내야 합니다. 아무리 이름에 공사중이... commented 2025-12-06 16:34:22 UTC by aaei924 ♦32 |
| 171401516 (Comments: 1) | lukasz klosek35 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Witaj! Byłem zmuszony wycofać zmiany "ułatwiające dojazd przy użyciu aplikacji e-Remiza", gdyż, wbrew pozorom, wcale nie ułatwiały tego zadania. Przede wszystkim, nastawnia już była oznaczona jako nastawnia, a jej oznaczenie ja... commented 2025-12-06 16:04:30 UTC by Kamil Kalata ♦48 |
| 137008331 (Comments: 1) | bernardifeanyi1 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Please provide a source that says that Kőris-hegy is a volcano. Its material is Jurassic limestone. commented 2025-12-06 16:02:33 UTC by nemethtamas ♦16 |
| 175003692 (Comments: 1) | cbbcbail (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for updating W Wash to reflect the recent changes. I noticed that you tagged the split sections as `highway=tertiary_link`. I changed it back to tertiary. Link is only when the road connections to a lower classified road. commented 2025-12-06 15:46:43 UTC by hobbesvsboyle ♦17 |
| 174836443 (Comments: 3) | Bobbi123 (Discussed changesets: 73) | Wie früher schon gesagt: für Kartendienste mit monatlicher Aktualisierung wie zB OSMAND ist dieses Mikromanagement kontraproduktiv. commented 2025-12-06 15:35:16 UTC by Daham ♦10 |
| 175589769 (Comments: 2) | hvtleven (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted by changeset #175590793 commented 2025-12-06 15:34:37 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175588966 (Comments: 2) | hvtleven (Discussed changesets: 2) | De gebouwen heb ik weer hersteld conform de BAG. Wanneer iets niet klopt dan svp aab het Kadaster doorgeven. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-06 15:27:52 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175587852 (Comments: 1) | nygrid1811plan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Please could you explain what malicious edit has been done here? commented 2025-12-06 15:22:32 UTC by BrackoNe ♦111 |
| 175587382 (Comments: 1) | nygrid1811plan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Please could you explain what malicious edit has been done here? commented 2025-12-06 15:22:10 UTC by BrackoNe ♦111 |
| 175587283 (Comments: 1) | nygrid1811plan (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Please could you explain what malicious edit has been done here? commented 2025-12-06 15:21:36 UTC by BrackoNe ♦111 |
| 175378899 (Comments: 4) | Dardug (Discussed changesets: 2) | Te invito al canal de Telegram de OSM Argentina, donde se puede hablar de estas cosas https://telegram.me/osm_ar Tenemos hasta un canal para Chaco y Corrientes. commented 2025-12-06 15:13:35 UTC by pertile ♦68 |
 | 175358445 (Comments: 1) | Erin0209 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Your mappings are not in line with the quality standards of HOTOSM. Inaccurately mapped. Not squared and nodes connected to other buildings. Please improve your mapping skills Best regards commented 2025-12-06 15:09:30 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 174867793 (Comments: 1) | Holly Mat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Here you mapped a few objects, where both the inside and outside show a shadow. These are no buildings (no roof) Also, here you did not map the straw covered buildings. Best regards commented 2025-12-06 14:51:55 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175565237 (Comments: 3) | Wonderful Alligator (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi.. I really don't know. Google is not allowed as source. The website fom the shop is allowed. But there is no website I believe? Anyway.. the shop is there. You may remove the address? It's not existing. Greetz.. egg... commented 2025-12-06 14:49:20 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 174868268 (Comments: 1) | Holly Mat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello . Thanks for the mappings. Your mappings are rather accurate. However, you overlooked the straw covered buildings, round and rectangular. Map them also the next time. Best regards commented 2025-12-06 14:49:11 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175360968 (Comments: 1) | Arnotsu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Accurately mapped. Please map the round huts as well next time. Best regards commented 2025-12-06 14:45:06 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 91845635 (Comments: 1) | Jordan Mann (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks a lot Jordan. I know this was 5 years ago, but I hope now consider using separate nodes instead of adding the shops' information to the whole building. As you can see from Mapillary they don't actually take up the whole building, the... commented 2025-12-06 14:37:02 UTC by ilias_ ♦376 |
| 175397221 (Comments: 4) | OliverMi1 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Meiner Meinung nach ja wegen des Aufbaus des Bahnhofs. Da befindet sich das Baufeld, wo Baustoffe liegen und auch Maschinen stehen. Da der erstere Weg sowieso gesperrt ist, ist ja sowieso kein Durchkommen. Jedenfalls ist der gesamte Abschnitt, auc... commented 2025-12-06 14:36:13 UTC by OliverMi1 ♦5 |
| 149925260 (Comments: 3) | Diabolo68 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-06 14:35:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 161603094 (Comments: 7) | javl (Discussed changesets: 5) | ..amenty=bicycle_parking.. en dan kun je de buildingtag laten staan. commented 2025-12-06 14:33:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 174884639 (Comments: 1) | Zoe Stanfill (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Sorry to say, but your mappings don't meet the quality standards of HOTOSM Inaccurately mapped. Buildings not squared. Clustered buildings . Connected nodes to other features. Please improve your map... commented 2025-12-06 14:27:16 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 149134732 (Comments: 3) | ma-rt-in (Discussed changesets: 264) | Alles klar Absolut nachvollziehbar Ich hab die HsNr jetzt nach ALKIS erfasst und bei den unstimmigen ein fixme hinterlassen. Findest du das in Ordnung? commented 2025-12-06 14:24:39 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,723 |
| 175587785 (Comments: 1) | kenken234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | There are slight differences between URA's subzones within planning area and HDB's neighbourhoods within towns. I;ve included elaboration in the description of the relevant relations commented 2025-12-06 14:21:17 UTC by kenken234 ♦36 |
| 175560592 (Comments: 1) | MustafaOyunda155 (Discussed changesets: 4) | building=proposed etiketi kullanılmaması gerekiyor. Önceki düzenlemedeki problem neydi? commented 2025-12-06 14:10:48 UTC by keyyushi ♦20 |
| 175581565 (Comments: 1) | MustafaOyunda155 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ankara Metro Proposed & Construction ilişkisini neden sildiniz? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17586582 commented 2025-12-06 14:08:01 UTC by keyyushi ♦20 |
| 175584124 (Comments: 4) | javl (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oke.. pas je het zelf aan. Ik heb de BGT omtrekgericht gebruikt. Toen was die parking kleiner. Dan zal nu de rest ook voor de auto s zijn opgeofferd. Tja.. al die bossen. In Den Haag heeft iemand van elke straat een bos gemaakt. Die ko... commented 2025-12-06 14:03:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175587274 (Comments: 1) | Thomaso58 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Ich habe den Born Trail überarbeitet. Er erfüllt nicht die Anforderungen an eine Route. (Kein Operator, nicht markiert). Er ist aber weitherum bekannt. Ich habe mein Möglichstes getan, damit es sauber aussieht und damit ein Benutzer au... commented 2025-12-06 14:03:17 UTC by Thomaso58 ♦27 |
| 174556963 (Comments: 1) | Yayadiro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Haritada bulunan eczaneyi kaldırıp üstüne kendi dükkanınızı koymuşsunuz. Değişikliği geri aldım. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175587376 commented 2025-12-06 14:00:32 UTC by keyyushi ♦20 |
| 175494155 (Comments: 2) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 2) | Accidental node relocation made, node change reverted #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175587293 commented 2025-12-06 13:57:08 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 174805401 (Comments: 5) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht und sorry das ich erst zu spät bei dir melde und sorry, das ist diese Frage antworte, obwohl ich es nicht verstehe!! Ich bin darauf ausgegangen, daß bei der Frage das Brot ... commented 2025-12-06 13:49:24 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 171951153 (Comments: 4) | Jybernard (Discussed changesets: 1) | la création de données 2D peut receler des pièges (la preuve), la 2,5D (ce que l'on peut faire dans OSM) est encore plus touchy ! Si vous souhaitez un échange de visu (je suis sur Belleville), contactez-moi via la mes... commented 2025-12-06 13:49:13 UTC by Britzz ♦244 |
| 175280668 (Comments: 2) | zinderMT (Discussed changesets: 3) | Töröltem a hibás értéket, köszönöm! commented 2025-12-06 13:45:36 UTC by zinderMT ♦2 |
| 175569261 (Comments: 1) | Bustte (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Varias correcciones. Las puertas de entrada no van en los cruces. No están en los cruces. Los nombres de las calles son los nombres oficiales, no descripciones de dónde están. Lo mismo con los parques. Si no ti... commented 2025-12-06 13:35:49 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175586461 (Comments: 1) | liums (Discussed changesets: 1) | Un terrain de trial a été installé sur une partie de la zone par l'association de monocyclistes Mono'Gre et la mairie (cf https://asso-monogre.blogspot.com/2025/06/mise-en-place-zone-trial.html) . Je ne suis pas certain... commented 2025-12-06 13:35:31 UTC by liums ♦1 |
| 175567615 (Comments: 1) | Bustte (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Cuál es el motivo de eliminar una localidad entera? Son importaciones que hicimos del INE. La vamos a reponer, pero por favor dar mayores explicaciones en en changesets. gracias --- ... commented 2025-12-06 13:29:49 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 172425199 (Comments: 2) | liljaadeliina (Discussed changesets: 62) | Ihan vaan fyi (for your information) commented 2025-12-06 13:26:28 UTC by rle32795 ♦27 |
| 175586139 (Comments: 1) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 156) | Bronnen, alleen voor referentie. - Archieven.nl / Zeeuws Archief (1905-1915) https://proxy.archieven.nl/0/7376451EBE044A619CE6C0493FECA4EA - Flickr (2009) https://www.flickr.com/photos/32178000@N03/3914859761/in/pool-grijpskerke/ - RCE... commented 2025-12-06 13:25:05 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦704 |
| 175073621 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht und sorry, das ich auch hier falsch eingetragen habe und das ich erst zu spät bei dir zurückmelde!! Wie kann ich diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig machen, ode... commented 2025-12-06 13:22:31 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 162075824 (Comments: 14) | LightWater7882 (Discussed changesets: 3) | any tags you like is not an advise to create duplicate undocumented tags that have exactly the same meaning as an existing, frequently used and documented tag that has been approved (And thus review) in a proposal. Otherwise, we end up with lots ... commented 2025-12-06 13:22:00 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,326 |
| 175073616 (Comments: 3) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht und sorry, das ich auch hier falsch eingetragen habe und das ich erst zu spät bei dir zurückmelde!! Wie kann ich diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig machen, ode... commented 2025-12-06 13:17:01 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 175073594 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht und sorry, das ich erst zu spät bei dir zurückmelde!! Danke, das du diese Änderung Rückgängig gemacht hast. Ja, die Frage habe ich leider nicht richt... commented 2025-12-06 13:15:05 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 174868305 (Comments: 1) | John Ashton Davies (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not map a building over a highway. Sat Nav systems cannot cope with that. The road ends there. Just move the road a bit aside. And, do not cluster multiple buildings as 1 building. Best regards commented 2025-12-06 13:13:04 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175237100 (Comments: 1) | Celine_the_Person (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not add names with a message to a building. Local mappers will add extra's when required like shop, café, church etc. Best regards commented 2025-12-06 13:11:59 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175584844 (Comments: 1) | rubenpeters91 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-06 13:10:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175054453 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht und sorry, das ich auch hier falsch eingetragen habe und das ich erst zu spät bei dir zurückmelde!! Wie kann ich diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig machen, ode... commented 2025-12-06 13:07:51 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
 | 172139505 (Comments: 2) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 98) | With pleasure. commented 2025-12-06 13:05:15 UTC by BigKev97 ♦85 |
| 172307053 (Comments: 2) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 98) | Translation is very tricky. commented 2025-12-06 13:04:42 UTC by BigKev97 ♦85 |
| 175054443 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht und sorry, das ich auch hier falsch eingetragen habe und das ich erst zu spät bei dir zurückmelde!! Wie kann ich diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig machen, ode... commented 2025-12-06 13:03:49 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 175583754 (Comments: 1) | Mastodommte (Discussed changesets: 7) | Pearle is already on the map, you are adding duplicate data. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3267487254 I’ll revert this. commented 2025-12-06 13:00:28 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,663 |
| 172957841 (Comments: 1) | CODATA-BO (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, qu'est-ce qu'on construit ? commented 2025-12-06 12:57:09 UTC by frosm ♦1,153 |
| 175054441 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht und sorry das ich zu spät zurückmelde und das ich hier den Insel eingetragen habe!! Wie kann ich diesen Fehler wieder Rückgängig machen, oder könntest du es b... commented 2025-12-06 12:52:25 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 175054442 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Sorry, das ich erst zu spät zurückmelde!! Auch sorry, das wusste ich auch hier leider nicht, das hier kein taktiles Pflaster gibt!! Und wie kann ich auch hier wieder Rückgängig machen oder k&o... commented 2025-12-06 12:46:22 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 175054421 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht, und Sorry, das ich auch hier falsch eingetragen habe!! Ich wusste leider nicht, das da leider keine taktiles Pflaster hat. Und wie kann ich das wieder Rückgängig mac... commented 2025-12-06 12:33:12 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 162246700 (Comments: 6) | mrpacmanmap (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hi again, Apologies if the links were not working, I'll explain with some images here - https://ibb.co/8LwhFMX7 This one here routes via Alwin road, while valid - you can simply stick to Powke Lane for a more direct route, it appears the ... commented 2025-12-06 12:25:38 UTC by FoldForever ♦1 |
| 175500501 (Comments: 1) | MirkoKunac (Discussed changesets: 3) | Whole Hutton Street should have been restricted, there is a sign from the north at Granville Drive. Reverting because of unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175583406 commented 2025-12-06 12:18:52 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175054415 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo Mcliquid, Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht, und sorry, das die Radwege komplett unterschlagen habe!! Und wie kann ich das wieder Rückgängig machen, oder kannst das auch bitte Rückgängig machen?? Dank... commented 2025-12-06 12:17:22 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 175577924 (Comments: 1) | 0xc4 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks for this. If the new bakery replaces the former one on the same spot, the best way to map this is to change the tags on the existing object instead of creating a new one. Tagging a shop as disused is good practice only when a sho... commented 2025-12-06 12:14:38 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,663 |
| 175054414 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo Mcliquid, Vielen Dank für deine Antwort und sorry, das ich erst zu spät zurückmelde!! Oh das wusste ich nicht. Wie kann ich das wieder Rückgang machen, oder kannst du das bitte für mich erledigen, bitte??<... commented 2025-12-06 12:05:24 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
 | 171909651 (Comments: 1) | Rowon1025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13142341064/history has shop = 印章 that was added in this edit shop=印章 ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openst... commented 2025-12-06 11:55:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 62563486 (Comments: 2) | kryniczan (Discussed changesets: 4) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185185262/history commented 2025-12-06 11:54:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 75196244 (Comments: 2) | LafarM (Discussed changesets: 50) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105079658/history commented 2025-12-06 11:54:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 75183466 (Comments: 2) | LafarM (Discussed changesets: 50) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281935383/history commented 2025-12-06 11:54:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 28926547 (Comments: 1) | sorbovit (Discussed changesets: 31) | source:maxgcweight = PL:sign_B-18? B-18 to chyba jest znak dotyczący masy rzeczywistej? nie maksymalnej masy dopuszczalnej? Więc tu chyba zwyczajne maxweight (i source:maxweight) powinno być? commented 2025-12-06 11:52:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175358847 (Comments: 1) | GrosBgDeToulouse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping Please do not map a plot with multiple buildings on it as 1 building. Map them individually. And solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mappings. Best regards commented 2025-12-06 11:49:06 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 174081722 (Comments: 1) | Lmldemax (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour et bienvenue dans la communauté OpenStreetMap, merci pour vos premières contributions. Je me suis permis de corriger certains chemins qui se superposait à d'autres et a détacher des chemins qui était... commented 2025-12-06 11:40:47 UTC by jbcharron ♦147 |
| 175579819 (Comments: 2) | Tomas Straupis (Discussed changesets: 84) | Labai nepageidautina, bet aš taip iš karto nepuolų jų trinti (aš čia tik tą sidewalk žymą ir pridėjau, kad mes profesionalius žemėlapius kurdami galėtume be vargo išmesti tokius nereikalingus duomenis). Bet su la... commented 2025-12-06 11:40:35 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,004 |
| 170815593 (Comments: 10) | StephaneP (Discussed changesets: 38) | Encore que.... avec 3 motos, ça doit être possible, à la condition qu'une d'entre elles utilise du chademo... :-D commented 2025-12-06 11:38:50 UTC by StephaneP ♦480 |
| 175459208 (Comments: 1) | Leptitmouton (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, Merci pour tes contributions dans les Vosges Il y a quelques années des contributions ont ajoutés des noms de chemins "Voie de {commmune} à {une autre commune}", ces noms sont issues du cadastre mais ne cor... commented 2025-12-06 11:22:25 UTC by jbcharron ♦147 |
| 175579906 (Comments: 2) | Rijden met marcel (Discussed changesets: 1) | De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-06 11:01:12 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 160691318 (Comments: 1) | rademalis (Discussed changesets: 68) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12456840038/history has source:maxgcweight = PL:sign_B-18 that was added in this edit B-18 to chyba jest znak dotyczący masy rzeczywistej? nie maksymalnej masy dopuszczalnej? Więc tu chyba zwyczaj... commented 2025-12-06 10:58:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175579900 (Comments: 1) | Roshan-Negi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thank you for your edit! When mapping buildings, you can make them rectangular by hitting Q on your keyboard when having it selected. Also please note that name = House is not the right way to tag this, because the building is not actu... commented 2025-12-06 10:55:57 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦42 |
 | 156933680 (Comments: 1) | BigKev97 (Discussed changesets: 98) | Hi BigKev97, where did this mass addition of street names came from? Looks non-free and copyrighted source. Can you please clarify. commented 2025-12-06 10:54:00 UTC by Enock4seth ♦588 |
| 171165955 (Comments: 2) | cOSMografix (Discussed changesets: 27) | Bonjour Ludovic C'est pas dirt du tout :) Erreur de doigt sur Streetcomplete. Bien vu. C'est corrigé. commented 2025-12-06 10:44:16 UTC by cOSMografix ♦24 |
| 145070487 (Comments: 3) | hofoen (Discussed changesets: 70) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-12-06 10:39:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175218318 (Comments: 17) | Dodko (Discussed changesets: 41) | To je uplne v pohode. Nema to ziadny dopad na OSM a OSMR. commented 2025-12-06 10:35:34 UTC by mapko ♦108 |
| 173801998 (Comments: 1) | btcitnet (Discussed changesets: 14) | da dove l'hai preso l'indirizzo? commented 2025-12-06 10:30:22 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦141 |
| 174369351 (Comments: 5) | alok1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Może warto wpisać te adresy URL do: source:name ? Jak kilka, to oddzielić średnikami? Wtedy byłoby mniej wątpliwości chyba. commented 2025-12-06 10:22:30 UTC by Las Wolski ♦11 |
| 175481018 (Comments: 1) | fmc_5 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hey, zur Erinnerung: Diese Aufsplittungen an Kreuzungen sind eigentlich unnötig, da sich ja aus der Kreuzung selbst ergibt, dass man dort nicht parken kann. lg, Alex commented 2025-12-06 10:21:44 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦432 |
| 175576831 (Comments: 4) | Meesvansteenbergen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Landuse construction aangepast naar greenfield .. name aangepast naar description. Nog geen bouwactiviteiten hier. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-06 10:17:34 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 164955047 (Comments: 1) | StC (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi StC, your recent changesets have left behind a lot of broken relations: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=2.61514&lat=48.38004&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node... commented 2025-12-06 10:15:01 UTC by gscholz ♦2,816 |
| 164884845 (Comments: 1) | StC (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi StC, your recent changesets have left behind a lot of broken relations: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=2.61514&lat=48.38004&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node... commented 2025-12-06 10:14:51 UTC by gscholz ♦2,816 |
| 175552199 (Comments: 1) | wolfbert (Discussed changesets: 16) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5079699 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175552199 commented 2025-12-06 10:14:37 UTC by Luzandro ♦955 |
| 173788067 (Comments: 1) | Bogomil Shopov - Бого (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10819338166/history - how table tennis how dirt surface? commented 2025-12-06 10:11:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 511938 (Comments: 1) | Javier Sanchez (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25605150/history has surface_material = dirt that was added in this edit why not use regular surface= tag? commented 2025-12-06 10:10:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175573108 (Comments: 2) | deferred2841 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah I didn't realise. Sorry, I'll make sure to read the wiki. commented 2025-12-06 10:10:28 UTC by deferred2841 ♦1 |
| 144918050 (Comments: 1) | Max Ogden (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402438943/history - surface=5 ? was it supposed to be lanes=5 ? commented 2025-12-06 10:07:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175488368 (Comments: 1) | Lola Fox (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi Lola Fox, your recent changesets have left behind several broken landuse relations, so the content cannot be rendered properly on maps: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.92238&lat=44.36362&zoom=15&baselay... commented 2025-12-06 10:06:33 UTC by gscholz ♦2,816 |
| 175462458 (Comments: 1) | Lola Fox (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi Lola Fox, your recent changesets have left behind several broken landuse relations, so the content cannot be rendered properly on maps: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.92238&lat=44.36362&zoom=15&baselay... commented 2025-12-06 10:04:01 UTC by gscholz ♦2,816 |
| 164730189 (Comments: 1) | OTNoblat (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour @OTNoblat Il y a un sousis dans le num de téléphone que vous avez indiqué pour Bob Le Fromager. Il manque des chiffres. Pouvez-vous faire la correction ? Merci d'avance commented 2025-12-06 10:01:14 UTC by Patchanka ♦413 |
| 10440232 (Comments: 1) | SergeDorval (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93641063/history has surface_material = dirt that was added in this edit why not use regular surface= tag? commented 2025-12-06 10:00:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 155654721 (Comments: 1) | 9854458923 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1310594058/history has shop = マックスバリュウ that was added in this edit shop=マックスバリュウ ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is... commented 2025-12-06 09:55:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 168517374 (Comments: 1) | Kurdy (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12979658710/history has shop = drugstore that was added in this edit Would it be pharmacy tagged as amenity=pharmacy ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpharmacy ) Something else? commented 2025-12-06 09:48:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 125820753 (Comments: 3) | JTS51 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Ahh Het fietspad heet officieel Voetpad, maar die stukjes bij de kazerne hebben kennelijk geen naam. Groet, eggie commented 2025-12-06 09:44:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175563374 (Comments: 1) | Fippe (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi :) wäre das nicht eigentlich etwas für die OHM (openhistoricalmap)? Gruß aus dem Waldecker Land --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175563374 ... commented 2025-12-06 09:42:40 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,723 |
| 175575806 (Comments: 2) | Meesvansteenbergen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bedankt voor de tip commented 2025-12-06 09:34:56 UTC by Meesvansteenbergen ♦5 |
| 126420563 (Comments: 3) | JeanMappe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for a fix! commented 2025-12-06 09:33:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 166990430 (Comments: 3) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 21) | > ref by itself is mysterious, so why not name it better? no idea who had this idea, maybe it makes more sense fot UK native speakers? Either way, it has got established and widely used. BTW, there are sillier ones, see https://wiki.open... commented 2025-12-06 09:33:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175576400 (Comments: 1) | kihyung (Discussed changesets: 1) | There's already 광화문 in this place. There's no need to repeat it a second time. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175577356 commented 2025-12-06 09:31:34 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 135631458 (Comments: 3) | rainerU (Discussed changesets: 44) | the last sentence was completely mistaken, ironically I created that page on wiki sorry (I had prepared comment that I copy pasted and it was outdated - sorry for a confusion!) commented 2025-12-06 09:29:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175576482 (Comments: 2) | AIAB (Discussed changesets: 3) | Duidelijk, bedankt! commented 2025-12-06 09:29:34 UTC by AIAB ♦3 |
| 175569009 (Comments: 1) | w34ver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes". Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag ! Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead. For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/... commented 2025-12-06 09:23:26 UTC by Comino ♦266 |
| 175550536 (Comments: 1) | xBitsNL (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Fout is het niet echt, maar beter berdrijven, brandweer e.d. op de adresnode bijtaggen. Dus niet de gebouwomtrek gebruiken... commented 2025-12-06 09:01:27 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175498477 (Comments: 1) | BlueAlpha8 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, You made lots of duplicated highway sections on the car parking service roads. I thin I've corrected/removed them all. Please try not to map any sections twice. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-06 08:39:35 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,011 |
 | 175530759 (Comments: 1) | Heismuron (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcoem to OSM! Please use lowercase characters for the keys and values: highway=path instead of Highway=Path! commented 2025-12-06 08:29:44 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 134383341 (Comments: 2) | redrace (Discussed changesets: 61) | Hi Feel free to so this. CU Meik commented 2025-12-06 08:28:59 UTC by redrace ♦164 |
| 175552222 (Comments: 2) | Meesvansteenbergen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Ik zal het meenemen commented 2025-12-06 08:24:31 UTC by Meesvansteenbergen ♦5 |
| 175551269 (Comments: 2) | Meesvansteenbergen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dank u wel commented 2025-12-06 08:23:31 UTC by Meesvansteenbergen ♦5 |
| 175542440 (Comments: 1) | Akira4755 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, You made lots of duplicate sections of footpaths here. I think I've corrected/removed all of them. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-06 08:23:23 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,011 |
| 175551575 (Comments: 2) | Meesvansteenbergen (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dank voor uw tip! commented 2025-12-06 08:23:17 UTC by Meesvansteenbergen ♦5 |
 | 158591156 (Comments: 2) | solenoid jam (Discussed changesets: 169) | Hello This store sells tractors and agricultural combines. I don't think the shop=agrarian attribute is appropriate for this store. Its value is between shop=agrarian and shop=cars. You can specify a more appropriate value if you're s... commented 2025-12-06 08:19:15 UTC by solenoid jam ♦189 |
| 167706450 (Comments: 3) | PropertyVIEW® (Discussed changesets: 31) | Instead of stuffing city into the name= tag, you are more than welcome to use "branch=*" tag to distinguish individual locations of a chain/franchise/whatever. --- Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2025-12-06 07:58:33 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175557979 (Comments: 1) | Fhacker (Discussed changesets: 1) | please make sure golf course areas don't overlap in the future. fairways shouldn't intersect tees or greens for example. commented 2025-12-06 07:48:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 159561463 (Comments: 4) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hallo, alles klar, sehe das der Weg dem GWR zu entnehmen ist. Gruss wies1 commented 2025-12-06 07:32:41 UTC by wies1 ♦172 |
 | 175164056 (Comments: 7) | Vmosnokia31 (Discussed changesets: 2) | vậy tôi thấy cứ để vậy một thời gian xem họ còn thay đổi không commented 2025-12-06 07:04:49 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦25 |
| 175475455 (Comments: 1) | Paytonhenry04 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Payton, I've reverted this changeset as there are dozen of problem edits that would take more effort to fix than to apply correctly. There were a ton of golf objects that were sloppily overlapping other objects (fairways and tee... commented 2025-12-06 07:03:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 175436008 (Comments: 2) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello MxxCon, Thanks for reaching out. Yes, I’ll look into getting my set-up updated to a more recent JOSM version. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-12-06 06:42:59 UTC by rajdhani ♦7 |
| 166116896 (Comments: 1) | NdwMan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo MdwMan, du hats hier einen Namen "Trafostation" eingetragen. FDad ist wohl eher eine Beschreibung. Genau so bei den vielen "Kanzeln". Einige wrden schon berichtigt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13328376236. Bitte be... commented 2025-12-06 06:09:58 UTC by uvi ♦136 |
| 174126804 (Comments: 4) | JhowieNitnek (Discussed changesets: 186) | dan dient state=proposed toegevoegd te worden. Zie info in de wiki over het mappen van fietssnelwegen ... commented 2025-12-06 05:56:50 UTC by Thierry1030 ♦256 |
| 175572500 (Comments: 1) | 8051 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 1625 of your last 1770 changes were deletions. This is qui... commented 2025-12-06 05:46:11 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,500 |
| 175568542 (Comments: 1) | donmac703 (Discussed changesets: 25) | It seems like these change continuously and you're endlessly updating the tags. If these values change so often do you need to have these updated in OSM? commented 2025-12-06 05:18:40 UTC by aharvey ♦1,894 |
 | 138105296 (Comments: 2) | 007Transformer (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello Mateusz Konieczny, Thanks for reaching out with the question. After checking the history, I noticed that this edit was made about two years ago when I was still a new mapper. At that time, I was also working on the Hasiru Aqua Small P... commented 2025-12-06 05:01:17 UTC by 007Transformer ♦15 |
 | 175323596 (Comments: 1) | k99991 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19118 commented 2025-12-06 04:18:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175496812 (Comments: 1) | Jonas Nelhiebel Naturpark Hirschwald (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo! Der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456019850 ist nun Teil von zwei Wanderwegrelatioinen, allerdings mit access=no getagged. Das macht keinen Sinn, daher bitte ich um Korrektur. commented 2025-12-06 04:15:58 UTC by ratrun ♦260 |
| 175564707 (Comments: 1) | Clairness (Discussed changesets: 4) | It looks like you may've applied English Bayou to one or two segments it probably shouldn't go on. I would consult the USGS GNIS domestic name search map for river names. When you pin a stream from the search results it will show the mouth ... commented 2025-12-06 04:12:19 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦11 |
| 171931503 (Comments: 1) | niartenyaw (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, this seems like a mistake? The diet:vegan/vegetarian=only tags are for places that *only* serve vegan/vegetarian food, respectively. In other words, diet:vegan=only is for a place that does not serve any animal products at all, and diet:vegetaria... commented 2025-12-06 02:29:36 UTC by Legimet ♦1 |
| 175564690 (Comments: 1) | midget sub (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi, I reverted this changeset because there is no longer a path there. The imagery isn't up to date but there is a new computer science building that just opened this fall that connects to the right side of the old computer science building, so ... commented 2025-12-06 02:13:01 UTC by jm428 ♦21 |
| 174625543 (Comments: 2) | OLIVEVER (Discussed changesets: 1) | Также не сокращайте названия улиц. Принято писать их полностью commented 2025-12-06 02:06:28 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,190 |
| 175101014 (Comments: 1) | Hoang@159 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19117 commented 2025-12-06 01:48:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175561564 (Comments: 3) | Beinardus (Discussed changesets: 5) | Aah. Yeah, row buildings can be hard to tell apart sometime. A good context clue in the US and western Canada (especially railroad boom towns like this one built ~1880-1930) is that the tightest density tends to be near the railroad tracks, and st... commented 2025-12-06 01:48:49 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 5100894 (Comments: 3) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 97) | Also 15 years ago...wow, that would have been one of my earliest Oklahoma edits... commented 2025-12-06 01:35:32 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175569514 (Comments: 1) | synthfi (Discussed changesets: 3) | also changed a ford into a bridge as that was obvious from imagery commented 2025-12-06 01:03:48 UTC by synthfi ♦7 |
| 174757286 (Comments: 1) | sjorford (Discussed changesets: 14) | Would planned:place=town suffice for the time being, seeing as its development plans envisions it as one? commented 2025-12-06 00:36:59 UTC by Aethonatic ♦16 |
| 175544234 (Comments: 1) | Guntram_Navis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456239137 ist wohl eher ein Reitplatz als eine Reitanlage im Sinne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding. Reitplatze werden normalerweise mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian get... commented 2025-12-06 00:14:25 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦854 |
| 167110577 (Comments: 1) | maro21 (Discussed changesets: 304) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9159329435/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with cha... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 162714534 (Comments: 1) | Hidoo00 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12601657140/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 164397285 (Comments: 1) | mikini (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12720552750/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 163445706 (Comments: 1) | MigaDo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/294888995/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with chan... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 164957961 (Comments: 1) | woderkant (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12753128543/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 139702626 (Comments: 1) | kkrauseADFC (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4337906534/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with cha... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 159928952 (Comments: 1) | mapuit (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12396508913/history has bicycle:repair = assisted_self_service that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would y... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 165959230 (Comments: 1) | acidyellow (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12818107221/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 133529642 (Comments: 1) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 232) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4708870499/history has bicycle:repair = mobile that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 165121589 (Comments: 1) | Danfost (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12766468551/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 159345459 (Comments: 1) | arevamp (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8032622099/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with cha... commented 2025-12-05 23:57:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 132590577 (Comments: 1) | cherbe (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10665000594/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 23:57:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 164834965 (Comments: 2) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 25) | This really interesting (if you can excuse my enthusiasm). It seems that that UPRN was at the end of the road, but has then been moved. I added it manually when it was at the junction between "Huntington Road" and "Brandsby Grove"... commented 2025-12-05 23:56:48 UTC by philipcullen ♦15 |
| 175541076 (Comments: 1) | czak123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-05 23:52:18 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175555670 (Comments: 1) | MrPommes (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. "Bąkowiec": https://www.openstreetmap.org/way... commented 2025-12-05 23:52:17 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175547422 (Comments: 1) | Kuba Teichman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) je... commented 2025-12-05 23:52:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 173867375 (Comments: 4) | S-zation (Discussed changesets: 33) | Nice - thank you for your additions to the map! commented 2025-12-05 23:35:04 UTC by S-zation ♦118 |
| 175210025 (Comments: 1) | MLNNCK (Discussed changesets: 3) | Guten Abend, Du behauptest in deinem changeset comment, die Hunsrückquerbahn sei in Betrieb und die Sanierung abgeschlossen, wozu ich keine Belege finden konnte. Ich war vor kurzem dort und habe noch Bauarbeiten beobachtet und laut Facebookse... commented 2025-12-05 23:28:50 UTC by Hendrik Helsper ♦1 |
| 175553857 (Comments: 1) | Rdeipenau (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 358 of your last 358 changes were deletions. This is quite... commented 2025-12-05 23:26:11 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,500 |
| 175567841 (Comments: 1) | Tamani Wolf (Discussed changesets: 4) | Die Ausbesserung der Linien-Relationen für die CeBus wird in den nächsten Monaten folgen. commented 2025-12-05 23:10:18 UTC by Tamani Wolf ♦1 |
| 149072932 (Comments: 1) | Malý hajzl (Discussed changesets: 6) | Zdravim, dakujem za doplnenie. Pozor ale na spravne znacenie. Cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1265690218 ma len zakaz vjazdu, nie zakaz vstupu aj chodcom. Takze vehicle=no. Cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331295702 cez pumpu... commented 2025-12-05 23:05:45 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,746 |
| 175538712 (Comments: 4) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 564) | Thanks for your reply, admitting to, and quickly fixing your error! I want to thank you as well for the work you do in increasing the data quality. commented 2025-12-05 22:53:55 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦626 |
| 157479345 (Comments: 2) | Hb- (Discussed changesets: 112) | It was a best guess. commented 2025-12-05 22:18:55 UTC by Hb- ♦308 |
| 175566475 (Comments: 2) | Thunderhead380 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also now OSM has it correctly marked, private access will be more clear, and routing engines will not route people that way any longer if they are using OSM data. But it is NOT correctly mapped on Google Maps, they have it as a road. People a... commented 2025-12-05 22:18:19 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 173221923 (Comments: 3) | eireidium (Discussed changesets: 48) | Thanks for fixing - I couldn't reverse my mistake. commented 2025-12-05 22:08:38 UTC by eireidium ♦33 |
| 175563290 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 280) | Cześć, ruch jest dwukierunkowy na północnej jezdni. commented 2025-12-05 21:57:29 UTC by stasiu512 ♦205 |
| 175558975 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:55:07 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175560522 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:54:41 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175560924 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:54:34 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175561186 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:54:29 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175561363 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:54:23 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175561911 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:54:18 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175562698 (Comments: 1) | Lishoo (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:54:10 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 164581973 (Comments: 1) | Johanson (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, gracias por contribuir a la base de datos de OSM, pero creo que olvidaste agregar etiquetas a las carreteras que dibujaste. commented 2025-12-05 21:50:03 UTC by Sandal man ♦398 |
| 175556630 (Comments: 1) | magdak222 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nazwę Żabka piszemy normalnie, nie wielkimi literami commented 2025-12-05 21:44:07 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
 | 175565791 (Comments: 1) | Shahram Sh Kamal (Discussed changesets: 1) | yes good commented 2025-12-05 21:43:33 UTC by Shahram Sh Kamal ♦1 |
| 175526751 (Comments: 1) | EBurgDeflocker (Discussed changesets: 1) | It doesn't seem likely that the Flock device is in the middle of the intersection. Can you move it to a more exact position? Look for pole shadows to help determine what it is physically. --- Publish... commented 2025-12-05 21:37:34 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175553041 (Comments: 1) | zosikk (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:36:57 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
| 175552993 (Comments: 1) | zosikk (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-05 21:36:52 UTC by bartgron ♦432 |
 | 175031282 (Comments: 1) | SoyJosueVerde (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello SoyJosueVerde, I noticed some highways were reclassified from tertiary and secondary to primary. These roads have maintained a long history of being secondary or tertiary, and do not appear to fit the definition of primary (https://wiki.... commented 2025-12-05 21:34:42 UTC by dcskobuffs ♦74 |
| 170409255 (Comments: 3) | Rainero (Discussed changesets: 101) | Hallo Mateusz, app_operated=* ist auf jeden Fall dokumentiert auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parcel%20locker?uselang=de Daher habe ich das Attribut verwendet. translated with DeepL: app_operated=* is de... commented 2025-12-05 21:28:34 UTC by Rainero ♦598 |
| 152319918 (Comments: 1) | Cyril5C (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/705459010/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with chan... commented 2025-12-05 21:19:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 132963172 (Comments: 1) | Voirie_3M (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10690475024/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 21:19:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 170540525 (Comments: 1) | AlmostSurelyRob (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13074971723/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 21:19:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 146527689 (Comments: 1) | ZenPhil (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11538082797/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 21:19:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 141001003 (Comments: 1) | skfd (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11177573877/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 21:19:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 133060280 (Comments: 1) | ti-lo (Discussed changesets: 869) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5150402677/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with cha... commented 2025-12-05 21:12:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 174039460 (Comments: 1) | mbeyerle (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10205355086/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 21:12:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
 | 148919808 (Comments: 1) | Yunan973 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11748319282/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 21:12:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 155042509 (Comments: 3) | rosch0815 (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks! commented 2025-12-05 21:12:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175538686 (Comments: 5) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 564) | it seems so, but if I find myself completely mistaken I prefer to map something else after reverting myself. commented 2025-12-05 20:56:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 170867660 (Comments: 6) | Florian-Géopile (Discussed changesets: 1) | J'ai trouvé un plan de l’aménagement des quais donc je modifie la map mais est-ce qu'il y a un élément "place piétonne", "parvis", ... enfin un élément qui nomme ce ... commented 2025-12-05 20:54:02 UTC by Florian-Géopile ♦1 |
| 175563010 (Comments: 3) | chr_meier1997 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, danke für die Rückmeldung. Das klingt erfreulich harmlos. Ja, die Hürden sind ziemlich hoch, das aber auch nicht ohne Grund. Die Hauptprobleme, die immer wieder auftreten: - Rechte an den Daten - Aktualitä... commented 2025-12-05 20:47:53 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
| 175557143 (Comments: 1) | KRLONXOOO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. Octopus parece existir. Los otros elementos qué son? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175557143 commented 2025-12-05 20:40:27 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175557045 (Comments: 1) | KRLONXOOO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola. por favor no usar nombres descriptivos. Solo oficiales. La plaza no se llama Coihueco? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175557045 commented 2025-12-05 20:33:59 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
 | 175416364 (Comments: 1) | MK 1 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hello MK 1! I noticed that you’ve updated ref tagging to formatting that doesn’t appear on this government resource (http://62.77.137.99/roads/index.php). For example, you updated ref=A3 to ref=A3.1 for (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/... commented 2025-12-05 20:33:12 UTC by HurricaneGator ♦19 |
| 175559738 (Comments: 1) | JD2202 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Das Tagging passt nur für einen Unterflurhydranten: Für die linke Saugstelle hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=987079235893621&focus=photo&x=0.1852114658967926&am... commented 2025-12-05 20:27:06 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
| 175544907 (Comments: 1) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 14) | You should know that OpneStreetMap is actually not a map but a database of map data that can be used by different map makers to make maps. The standard map on the OSM website is called Carto, and doesn't display sports clubs and health workers. ... commented 2025-12-05 20:09:13 UTC by rhhs ♦160 |
| 164943888 (Comments: 1) | foehn (Discussed changesets: 11) | Je suppose que "https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1377473134#map=18/48.264339/-4.609368&layers=N" c'est juste pour faire sauter des avertissmeent. En regardant le LIDAR, j'ai l'impression que ce n'est pas l'endr... commented 2025-12-05 20:04:59 UTC by trial ♦991 |
| 175462379 (Comments: 4) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi there, I fixed Allen Road according to what the City of Toronto said. I contacted Toronto 311 and was told that it should be classified as a Primary road and not a motorway, as it is not a highway at all and is classified as a municipal major road... commented 2025-12-05 20:00:02 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 175558797 (Comments: 1) | Clauda Lucena (Discussed changesets: 2) | I flagged some footprints here which most likely do not represent buildings. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175558797 commented 2025-12-05 19:56:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
 | 175487837 (Comments: 1) | Ratigra (Discussed changesets: 1) | I removed area=yes because that is not needed on landuse (all landuse is ALWAYS an area!). But what do you mean with surface_colour=yellow on a cemetery? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface:colour commented 2025-12-05 19:50:37 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,828 |
| 175545027 (Comments: 1) | Kaizokupim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag pim De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode conform afspraken binnen OSM Nederland. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-05 19:50:23 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175559391 (Comments: 1) | wiktoria111 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Zmiana zostanie za chwile w całości wycofana. Proszę przekazać opiekunom by przestali kolejnym dzieciom zlecać edycję mapy OSM do własnych celów. OSM nie służy do tego typu zajęć. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSM... commented 2025-12-05 19:46:29 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦574 |
| 175545384 (Comments: 1) | Kaizokupim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Pim.. Probeer svp geen adresnodes te verwijderen. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-05 19:46:01 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175544782 (Comments: 1) | Kaizokupim (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-05 19:41:22 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175561964 (Comments: 1) | acubens71 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ai réutilisé les tags de la version 7 du bâtiment. commented 2025-12-05 19:38:19 UTC by acubens71 ♦40 |
| 175536897 (Comments: 2) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Tak, byłem na miejscu i widziałem numer oraz rozmawiałem z właścicielem (pracuję jako kurier). commented 2025-12-05 19:34:58 UTC by rafalw8 ♦1 |
| 175558987 (Comments: 1) | Clauda Lucena (Discussed changesets: 2) | The two northern footpritns represent buildings, the southern one does not; unlike the others it casts no shadow. Thank you for your contribution! Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery inte... commented 2025-12-05 19:23:01 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175551238 (Comments: 1) | Robin Niebuhr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, most buildings you added here represent buildings but the one I flagged outlines a yard. Note how the scene is lit and use that to aid your interpretation. Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution! Each footprint should r... commented 2025-12-05 19:10:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175560682 (Comments: 1) | Bobbi123 (Discussed changesets: 73) | Halte diesen Commit nicht zielführend commented 2025-12-05 19:09:11 UTC by SimonHarms ♦8 |
| 175551758 (Comments: 1) | RaZoX (Discussed changesets: 8) | Kolejna "aktualizacja" z "własnym" źródłem. Stosuj ciut bardziej szczegółowy opis aktualizacji i źródła, bo każdy ma swoje źródła ;) commented 2025-12-05 19:08:26 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦319 |
| X | 175560498 (Comments: 2) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 283) | Yes, I can! It was simply a mistake at my side leaving another cs open in JOSM! commented 2025-12-05 19:08:23 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,828 |
| 175236480 (Comments: 1) | brainwad (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, I just reverted a maleficient edit concerning busline 38 of a user before you. Since your changeset also edits this line, please check that your edits aren't affected. Thanks! commented 2025-12-05 19:01:33 UTC by Makeena ♦46 |
| 175360154 (Comments: 8) | Camoscio Sibillini (Discussed changesets: 1) | Puoi usare il tag DISUSED ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused ), o eventualmente ABANDONED ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned ), seguendo la sintassi descritta nelle pagine della wiki. Comunque scrivimi pure privatament... commented 2025-12-05 18:58:45 UTC by dp7 ♦58 |
| 175558349 (Comments: 1) | osmcrsdrv (Discussed changesets: 1) | This appears to be centered in a driveway. What's the camera mounted on? I might be able to better locate it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175558349 commented 2025-12-05 18:55:06 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 168867078 (Comments: 1) | osm-pt-account 😎 (Discussed changesets: 78) | Don't blindly delete important parts of relations without respecting notes and instructions about the current local situation if you don't have any local knowledge! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175560464 commented 2025-12-05 18:52:06 UTC by Makeena ♦46 |
| 168832228 (Comments: 1) | osm-pt-account 😎 (Discussed changesets: 78) | Don't blindly delete important parts of relations without respecting notes and instructions about the current local situation if you don't have any local knowledge! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175560209 commented 2025-12-05 18:43:37 UTC by Makeena ♦46 |
| 175351472 (Comments: 1) | Termininja (Discussed changesets: 36) | Малко е рано за тротоари. Още не са излезли новите снимки и после ще трябва да се наместват. Отделно предстои изграждането и на кръгово кр... commented 2025-12-05 18:38:29 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦750 |
| 175456663 (Comments: 1) | LeoKutno (Discussed changesets: 10) | Jak już poprawiasz te `landuse=farmland` to warto jednak dodawać te `landuse=residential`/`landuse=farmyard` w miejscu tych budynków, bo takie przesuwanie by zostawić pustą plamę raczej jest średnio sensowne. No i zachęcam przy okazj... commented 2025-12-05 18:31:10 UTC by NieWnen ♦1,188 |
| 175435121 (Comments: 2) | SKald (Discussed changesets: 22) | pas de quoi :) commented 2025-12-05 18:25:36 UTC by SKald ♦38 |
| 175533785 (Comments: 3) | HPZ_90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Mateusz! I wanted to indicate this parcel locker can be operated (send/picnup oarcels etc.) either via display not using a smartphone at all or qr codes from the app can be scanned for various actions. Regarding the wiki page you mentioned, I f... commented 2025-12-05 18:17:41 UTC by HPZ_90 ♦1 |
| 175554601 (Comments: 1) | mictter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mi primera contribución a OSM, la traza GPS la grabé con Organic Maps en el móvil. commented 2025-12-05 18:15:51 UTC by mictter ♦1 |
| 175525028 (Comments: 1) | ValidDistress (Discussed changesets: 13) | 👍 commented 2025-12-05 18:07:55 UTC by L'imaginaire ♦418 |
| 173771182 (Comments: 1) | Olav63 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Pour info, l'attribut oneway=no est inutile dans la grande majorité des cas, car c'est la valeur par défaut. Il peut néanmoins être utile pour indiquer aux autres contributeurs que malgré le fai... commented 2025-12-05 17:55:14 UTC by zorglubu ♦345 |
| 161104979 (Comments: 3) | wuff57 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hello Mateusz, there are basically two types of parcel_lockers in Germany. One can only be operated via app, i.e. it does not have a display or any other input means, the other has a display and a barcode scanner. I saw that someone else had indicate... commented 2025-12-05 17:48:54 UTC by wuff57 ♦47 |
| 175354406 (Comments: 1) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 283) | Ahoj, už jsem Ti to psal do soukromé zprávy, nicméně ještě oficiálně - nástupiště https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455131933 je bohužel nesprávně vytvořeno, takové v Otrokov... commented 2025-12-05 17:48:18 UTC by Pontiac_CZ ♦33 |
 | 175553359 (Comments: 1) | LachDown (Discussed changesets: 1) | You also made edits in Japan somehow, please keep your changes local! commented 2025-12-05 17:42:05 UTC by ilias_ ♦376 |
| 157139310 (Comments: 4) | Marek-M (Discussed changesets: 167) | Dzięki! commented 2025-12-05 17:41:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175557609 (Comments: 1) | Vinber (Discussed changesets: 19) | And thanks for fixing! commented 2025-12-05 17:40:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 128706585 (Comments: 3) | salisburymistake (Discussed changesets: 13) | thanks! I was guessing that unit conversion may be root cause, but I was only guessing commented 2025-12-05 17:40:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 152744032 (Comments: 2) | udonf (Discussed changesets: 4) | welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!) sorry for last sentence being wrong commented 2025-12-05 17:23:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 126875770 (Comments: 2) | Bugdude (Discussed changesets: 6) | welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!) sorry for last sentence being wrong commented 2025-12-05 17:23:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 136564790 (Comments: 2) | goodidea (Discussed changesets: 30) | welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!) sorry for last sentence being wrong commented 2025-12-05 17:23:02 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 165944093 (Comments: 2) | HPG_64 (Discussed changesets: 12) | welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!) sorry for last sentence being wrong commented 2025-12-05 17:22:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175326790 (Comments: 2) | ekw (Discussed changesets: 7) | welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!) sorry for last sentence being wrong commented 2025-12-05 17:22:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 160237188 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 905) | welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!) sorry for last sentence being wrong commented 2025-12-05 17:22:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 152028924 (Comments: 2) | Herbert167 (Discussed changesets: 7) | welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!) sorry for last sentence being wrong commented 2025-12-05 17:22:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 148391364 (Comments: 2) | Vinber (Discussed changesets: 19) | yes, it was a mistake, ok https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175557609#map=19/44.771966/-0.337877 commented 2025-12-05 17:21:34 UTC by Vinber ♦818 |
| 146324882 (Comments: 1) | emersonveenstra (Discussed changesets: 75) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/127985472/history has shop = equipment that was added in this edit shop=equipment ? What kind of equipment? Medical equipment? Power tools? Sport equipment? Industrial equipment? (see https://wiki.openstre... commented 2025-12-05 17:21:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175468169 (Comments: 1) | Gegè V (Discussed changesets: 1) | l'indirizzo mettilo su dove è visibile dalla strada, ad esempio, se l'indirizzo si trova davanti al municipio, mapparlo la commented 2025-12-05 17:20:54 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦141 |
 | 175557559 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 564) | hashtags tag is wrong commented 2025-12-05 17:19:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 162988683 (Comments: 1) | Thartek (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1265477542/history has power = 400 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-05 17:15:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 129571120 (Comments: 2) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 221) | Hmm, racja. To powinno być building=service? commented 2025-12-05 17:15:00 UTC by kubahahaha ♦415 |
| 175378670 (Comments: 1) | Dardug (Discussed changesets: 2) | Entiendo que con "otros mapas" se refiere a Google Maps, porque por lo menos ahí lo encontré. No podemos usar GMaps como fuente, ya que ellos no permiten con su licencia que ocupemos datos suyos para nuestro mapa. Debiera ser ... commented 2025-12-05 17:02:27 UTC by pertile ♦68 |
| 174770189 (Comments: 2) | Uncle181 (Discussed changesets: 5) | En effet, je confirme basé également sur l'OD de Nantes: https://data.nantesmetropole.fr/explore/dataset/244400404_schema-directeur-infrastructures-cyclables-nantes-metropole/custom/ En fait, tout la branche de droite ne ... commented 2025-12-05 17:01:20 UTC by Uncle181 ♦3 |
| 123157873 (Comments: 2) | hlfan (Discussed changesets: 53) | Ja, das hab ich auch irgendwann überrissen, hab aber nie mich dran erinnern können das hier abzuändern. Danke für die Korrektur! commented 2025-12-05 16:59:59 UTC by hlfan ♦77 |
| X | 175366159 (Comments: 3) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | At least a portion of it ... commented 2025-12-05 16:56:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,707 |
| 175555043 (Comments: 1) | UEisemann (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, why did you split these highways? That only makes them harder to edit. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175556616 commented 2025-12-05 16:55:14 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦140 |
| 175174333 (Comments: 1) | SC_AE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, happened upon your edits, and I noticed a couple areas where the farmland extends through forest, which seems questionable. (there is landuse=orchard if they're fruit trees) Hoping you can be more careful about this, especially in places whe... commented 2025-12-05 16:38:09 UTC by neuhausr ♦338 |
| 88899137 (Comments: 1) | nmjwx (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I happened upon your edit, which created a beach entirely within the body of water. As I read the wiki, natural=beach should be the water's edge. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=beach Sand flats exposed at low tide would be t... commented 2025-12-05 16:27:45 UTC by neuhausr ♦338 |
 | 166997828 (Comments: 1) | customer2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12876511240/history has shop = مواد_غذایی that was added in this edit shop=مواد_غذایی ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anythin... commented 2025-12-05 16:23:23 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 171662664 (Comments: 2) | Elwell (Discussed changesets: 4) | or source= for source which is more likely here on second thought commented 2025-12-05 15:53:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 117892602 (Comments: 2) | Fintocubano (Discussed changesets: 6) | or source if that is source, which seems more likely commented 2025-12-05 15:52:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 154110145 (Comments: 1) | The Local Surveyor (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12061618925/history has reference = 12508 that was added in this edit maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref would fit? ref= is widely used for references commented 2025-12-05 15:52:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175424262 (Comments: 3) | DrF_Master7 (Discussed changesets: 3) | A rotunda já surge na Esri World Imagery. Existe um offset de cerca de 8m. commented 2025-12-05 15:44:44 UTC by hvalentim ♦95 |
| 175552660 (Comments: 2) | Rdeipenau (Discussed changesets: 4) | reverted commented 2025-12-05 15:44:44 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,493 |
| 175536707 (Comments: 3) | Mone-Limone (Discussed changesets: 1) | Eleganter geht es im Editor mit den vielfältigen Möglichkeiten und Werkzeugen die die Bearbeitung vereinfachen können. https://up.picr.de/50338464ze.png Du berührst mit der Maus den Grundriss des Gebäudes, machs... commented 2025-12-05 15:34:26 UTC by Peer van Daalen ♦72 |
| 175388571 (Comments: 1) | Michi_SWMH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Einige deiner mit highway=footway getaggten Wege sind Grundstückszufahrten und sollten deshalb mMn mit highway=service, service=driveway getaggt werden. Siehe auch das Wiki dazu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway un... commented 2025-12-05 15:33:40 UTC by JoelKl ♦2 |
| 174712131 (Comments: 3) | Trail_Caretaker (Discussed changesets: 37) | Thank you. In this case the issues beyond the size of the changeset (it's HUGE) are: - Your description. It needs to be much more specific. - You mapped a trail (way ID 1451006980) wrong. What you mapped does not exist in reality. Plea... commented 2025-12-05 15:29:04 UTC by c0nsumer ♦12 |
| 137989387 (Comments: 3) | Shawn Riley (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah interesting, thanks for checking. I've updated the road name commented 2025-12-05 15:28:21 UTC by rivermont ♦228 |
| 175552330 (Comments: 1) | Rdeipenau (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello Rdeipenau, in this changeset you have deleted 200 roads and the only comment you offered about this was "05/12/25". This is not sufficient; a deletion like that requires an explanation why these features have gone (for example "t... commented 2025-12-05 15:18:33 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,493 |
| 175552428 (Comments: 1) | rohieb (Discussed changesets: 47) | Ich habe hier leisure=sports_hall gegenüber sports_centre vorgezogen, da es sich nur um eine einzelne Halle (mit Nebenräumen) handelt; meiner Meinung nach zu klein für ein "Sportzentrum" (wie z.B. an der Wilh.-Bode-Straß... commented 2025-12-05 15:13:37 UTC by rohieb ♦128 |
| 175513733 (Comments: 3) | HugoApus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je ne connais pas l'application Wandrer. Une règle générale est de «ne faut pas tagguer pour le rendu», ni pour une application. Les données doivent représenter la réalité et c'es... commented 2025-12-05 15:10:11 UTC by Gonéo ♦247 |
| 167728787 (Comments: 4) | fx99 (Discussed changesets: 81) | what about amenity=healthcare (instead of shop) ? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/amenity#values commented 2025-12-05 15:09:32 UTC by fx99 ♦130 |
| 171571001 (Comments: 3) | wolfbert (Discussed changesets: 16) | Sollte jetzt wieder passen. commented 2025-12-05 15:08:21 UTC by wolfbert ♦118 |
| 175500344 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 19) | Le tag highway=busway serait à privilégier d'après https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=busway?uselang=fr Merci. commented 2025-12-05 15:02:01 UTC by Rom1 ♦395 |
| 161614394 (Comments: 1) | aedbauer (Discussed changesets: 10) | Be sure to watch all tags when changing things... your redone Cimarron Turnpike eastbound onramp was tagged as going to Hallet and Jennings as OK 99... commented 2025-12-05 14:57:06 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175546351 (Comments: 1) | andrzej-pl (Discussed changesets: 21) | Szkoła Filialna w Zalesiu została zlikwidowana w okolicach reformy 1999 roku lub rok/dwa lata przedtem. Specjalnie ją oznaczyłem was:building=school by zasygnalizować jej pierwotne przeznaczenie, a następnie sprawdzić na miejscu obecne (chyba ... commented 2025-12-05 14:52:43 UTC by VJMK ♦5 |
| 175551359 (Comments: 1) | Sylabowy Kot (Discussed changesets: 121) | Podczas wizji lokalnej zauważyłem, że te pawilony mają numerację o numerach powielających te z CWW DOM. Wg https://www.bartycka24.pl/mapa-centrum/ mają one innego operatora. Stąd też wiem, że dodany przez kogoś punkt 24A na pewno nie jest ... commented 2025-12-05 14:50:56 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦319 |
| 175550353 (Comments: 1) | Taksine (Discussed changesets: 37) | 注：后面这个标签如何标由鼠宝宝来做决定啦(≧▽≦) commented 2025-12-05 14:39:19 UTC by Taksine ♦133 |
| 145720321 (Comments: 1) | Constance-IRG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11471939560/history has reference = LB101 that was added in this edit maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref would fit? ref= is widely used for references commented 2025-12-05 14:28:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 168488136 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, no debes eliminar los nodos de escuela para luego crear un área nueva de escuela ya que se pierde el historial de los nodos, en el siguiente link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial#T%C3%A9cnicas_de_edici%C3... commented 2025-12-05 14:26:54 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175549183 (Comments: 1) | magneticred (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please map round buildings as round buildings ! I invalidated this task. Please map them correctly Best regards commented 2025-12-05 14:24:45 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 168488620 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, no entiendo por que pudiste modificar la geometría de la notaria y el edificio de tránsito y transporte, pero en los otros edificios no les modificaste la geometria en vez de eso los eliminaste y luego los volviste a crear ht... commented 2025-12-05 14:11:52 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 166337060 (Comments: 2) | PPete2 (Discussed changesets: 45) | Ja du hast recht, da ist beim Tagging was schief gelaufen. Dieses Kommentar gehört nur in die beiden noexit-Notes commented 2025-12-05 14:09:35 UTC by PPete2 ♦138 |
| 175546310 (Comments: 2) | Sokrates Zancor (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175549751 where the comment is: "Remove test edits" commented 2025-12-05 14:04:43 UTC by NeisRevert ♦364 |
| 168488746 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste el ancianato y luego creaste uno nuevo? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168488746 (en rojo se resalta lo que eliminaste) el ancianato que fue eliminado tenia todas las etiquetas haciendo las descripcion... commented 2025-12-05 13:52:49 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175206828 (Comments: 1) | Tuturdu60 (Discussed changesets: 1) | We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. We cannot expect fro... commented 2025-12-05 13:50:26 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175549015 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 564) | Ryanair is using it commented 2025-12-05 13:46:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175548737 (Comments: 1) | ScottB726 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thank you for adding those buildings! You can make them rectangular by hitting Q on your keyboard when having them selected. Thanks and happy mapping! commented 2025-12-05 13:46:05 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦42 |
| 168489142 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, no se debe eliminar el parque, la iglesia que fueron creados en el 2019, ni el banco https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168489142 (en rojo se resalta lo que tu eliminaste), lo que se debe hacer es mejorar sus geometrías haci... commented 2025-12-05 13:44:59 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 156853282 (Comments: 1) | Lübeck (Discussed changesets: 86) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506206402/history has demolished:building = 2023 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-05 13:40:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 168489189 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, no se deben eliminar edificios que fueron creados en el 2019 y luego volverlos a crear ya que se debe mantener el historial https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial commented 2025-12-05 13:40:18 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175205226 (Comments: 2) | seichter (Discussed changesets: 70) | To my opinion there should be a clear distinction between linear objects like highway=* and area objects e.g. landuse=*. pedestrian areas are of the second kind and there is a method of doing this: highway:area=pedestrian https://wiki.openstree... commented 2025-12-05 13:33:10 UTC by seichter ♦102 |
| 172818526 (Comments: 1) | Ktkt1313 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13191986818/history has shop = Ganesh Store that was added in this edit shop=Ganesh Store ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https:/... commented 2025-12-05 13:29:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175517976 (Comments: 3) | tmr21 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hola. Se demoran un poco. hay que tener paciencia. saludos commented 2025-12-05 13:28:59 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175501058 (Comments: 2) | Kuba116111 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Naprawiłem commented 2025-12-05 13:28:14 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦822 |
| 175362297 (Comments: 4) | Benoît C MdP (Discussed changesets: 29) | Je n'en ai pas non plus, c'est pour cela que je fais confiance à la communauté pour corriger si nécessaire. Ceci étant, c'est assez rare dans mes contributions d'avoir ce type d'erreur. Beno... commented 2025-12-05 13:27:43 UTC by Benoît C MdP ♦196 |
| 104005172 (Comments: 2) | le mic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aie….salut Sylvain Cela fait plus de 4 ans, et je n’ai lu ton mot, pourtant le chemin existe toujours, il est tellement beau !!. Je vais essayer de modifier ce que m’avais demandé. Merci pour ta patience… commented 2025-12-05 13:23:52 UTC by le mic ♦1 |
| 175464522 (Comments: 1) | RaZoX (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wartości są już podane w tagu unsigned_ref. Na forum omawiano, że do tego tagu dodajemy tego typu informację. Tag name stosujemy w większości przypadków do nazw tekstowych, nie kodowych. commented 2025-12-05 13:23:05 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦319 |
| 175518740 (Comments: 2) | tmr21 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Vale, gracias. Actualizaré una vez que tenga mas información sobre el recinto. ¿Cuando apaercen los cambios en el mapa oficial online? commented 2025-12-05 13:23:02 UTC by tmr21 ♦4 |
| 172853641 (Comments: 1) | RaZoX (Discussed changesets: 8) | Jak to "własne" źródło? commented 2025-12-05 13:20:45 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦319 |
| 175469589 (Comments: 1) | apgosm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Why is this road maped across a building? Please stop adding selfadviresment as a large part of you changesets description or moderators will stop your job. commented 2025-12-05 13:19:03 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦319 |
| 37635287 (Comments: 1) | Jaeger52 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hallo, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3964670 commented 2025-12-05 13:14:31 UTC by qugeb ♦86 |
| 175479155 (Comments: 1) | Katie_Cheung (Discussed changesets: 1) | Podawanie nazwy w opisie to za mało. Zmiana została wycofana, gdyż nazwa została naniesiona na granicę parafii. Zresztą nie przypominam sobie, by ten chodnik "obok" miał nadane nazewnictwo. commented 2025-12-05 13:13:46 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦319 |
| 152986220 (Comments: 3) | Yavotch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks. I thought it was probably something like that. commented 2025-12-05 13:12:48 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 175544489 (Comments: 1) | tamelppa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please write in internation language. What do you mean by this letter? commented 2025-12-05 13:11:06 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦319 |
| 175350101 (Comments: 1) | PetraJo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fully reverted accidental edits in this changeset: 175547109 commented 2025-12-05 13:07:48 UTC by soliMM ♦41 |
| 175534013 (Comments: 2) | Tomas Straupis (Discussed changesets: 84) | Because it is CURRENTLY an observation tower. When people search for observation towers in our tourism search, this one should also be listed. commented 2025-12-05 13:01:54 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,004 |
| 175274256 (Comments: 2) | santacluis (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have removed these changes as they were incorrect and problematic. You destroy precision in ways to fix a problem you did not know how to fix. I have fixed the area. Regards commented 2025-12-05 12:58:26 UTC by kapazao ♦950 |
| 175499763 (Comments: 2) | Giorovv (Discussed changesets: 10) | Grazie demon, dev'essere stato un errore di cui non mi ero accorto. commented 2025-12-05 12:57:40 UTC by Giorovv ♦5 |
| 175504581 (Comments: 3) | Lusze (Discussed changesets: 1) | German names are all fine, but problem was with creating duplicate objects (points), in case of Gediminas tower you've also taken one part of a 3D building, changed it from building:part to building (thus making also an overlapping building) and... commented 2025-12-05 12:54:09 UTC by Tomas Straupis ♦2,004 |
| 174910894 (Comments: 3) | velomalopolska (Discussed changesets: 5) | Dzięki za poprawki! Dorzuciłem jeszcze construction=cycleway do tego budowanego łącznika pod mostem, żeby było jasne, że będzie to droga dla rowerów. commented 2025-12-05 12:48:43 UTC by YomanNH ♦408 |
 | 175340873 (Comments: 4) | NKA (Discussed changesets: 144) | Jeg kommer ikke til å gidde å legge inn alt på nytt, nei, det bør jo den som overskriver informasjon fra stedlig befaring gjøre... Så du må gjerne justere slik at det stemmer overens med det jeg hadde lagt ... commented 2025-12-05 12:48:18 UTC by norgis ♦13 |
| 175442653 (Comments: 2) | shirokolobov (Discussed changesets: 2) | Спасибо большое, не знал! commented 2025-12-05 12:45:31 UTC by shirokolobov ♦2 |
| 168624882 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por qué eliminaste los 7 bloques de edificios? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168624882 (en rojo esta resaltado lo que eliminaste) commented 2025-12-05 12:38:28 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 162074135 (Comments: 1) | chris66 (Discussed changesets: 116) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12553367806/history has shop = fairtrade that was added in this edit What kind of products are sold there? shop tag should contain shop type value - and fairtrade is not one You can have fair... commented 2025-12-05 12:33:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175412690 (Comments: 8) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 111) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19111 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19112 commented 2025-12-05 12:32:35 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
 | 87593576 (Comments: 2) | Sergiy Kozyr (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thanks for the note. Fixed 'building:part' tag value. commented 2025-12-05 12:31:30 UTC by Sergiy Kozyr ♦29 |
| 175545524 (Comments: 1) | _kecaptraitim (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks and happy mapping commented 2025-12-05 12:25:51 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦42 |
| 90404363 (Comments: 1) | kartonage (Discussed changesets: 113) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406133192/history has shop = agricultural_machinery that was added in this edit Maybe shop=agrarian agrarian=agricultural_machinery would be better tagging? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=... commented 2025-12-05 12:21:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 162295032 (Comments: 1) | mcliquid (Discussed changesets: 206) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228653444/history has shop = agricultural_machinery that was added in this edit Maybe shop=agrarian agrarian=agricultural_machinery would be better tagging? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=... commented 2025-12-05 12:21:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 168761705 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los 32 edificios que fueron creados en el 2016? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168761705 (en rojo están resaltados los edificios que eliminaste) no se deben eliminar edificios y volverlos a crea... commented 2025-12-05 12:20:07 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 137235866 (Comments: 1) | Jan Forman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2534833610/history has shop = agricultural_machinery that was added in this edit Maybe shop=agrarian agrarian=agricultural_machinery would be better tagging? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sho... commented 2025-12-05 12:13:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 161747035 (Comments: 1) | resettler (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2751039652/history has shop = agricultural_machinery that was added in this edit Maybe shop=agrarian agrarian=agricultural_machinery would be better tagging? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sho... commented 2025-12-05 12:13:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 134985955 (Comments: 1) | unni-geo (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157616519/history has shop = crystal that was added in this edit shop=crystal ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openst... commented 2025-12-05 12:02:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 126798425 (Comments: 1) | PCarew_EG (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/118127518/history has shop = crystal that was added in this edit shop=crystal ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openst... commented 2025-12-05 12:01:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 132582248 (Comments: 1) | Gen BIT Tourtour (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10661716769/history has shop = glacier_-_terroir_-_décoration that was added in this edit shop=glacier_-_terroir_-_décoration ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services o... commented 2025-12-05 12:00:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175542914 (Comments: 1) | April Fairy (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted - per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part , the whole building should have the maximum number of floors of its parts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175544718 commented 2025-12-05 11:59:37 UTC by yelisey90 ♦211 |
| 123333135 (Comments: 2) | Christian Nilsson (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. You are correct, that was the intention here. Thank you for discovering it. commented 2025-12-05 11:47:47 UTC by Christian Nilsson ♦1 |
| 175359955 (Comments: 1) | ZynoXelek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please map round buildings as well the next time you map. Best regards commented 2025-12-05 11:46:58 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 174880577 (Comments: 3) | Caster89 (Discussed changesets: 4) | thanks for fix (and mapping in general!), I closed note commented 2025-12-05 11:38:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175503706 (Comments: 1) | mhlousek (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A few remarks. Don't cluster buildings . Map round buildings as well. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-12-05 11:32:16 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 174618207 (Comments: 2) | ChristianScham (Discussed changesets: 1) | When you see a plot surrounded with walls, just map the building inside of it. Not the whole plot. Best regards commented 2025-12-05 11:28:10 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 168543413 (Comments: 2) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 24) | I made it up. I did see that a couple days ago and think 'what a crazy tag, who put that there' and then I realised... I think the rationale was that the campsite is only open for visitors on a select few days of the year (for example the G... commented 2025-12-05 11:23:38 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 175535487 (Comments: 1) | magneticred (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. When you see an object where both the inside and outside shadows are visible, don't map it as a building. Probably it is just a cattle yard. Best regards commented 2025-12-05 11:18:22 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175538475 (Comments: 1) | magneticred (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please map round buildings as a round building. You mapped them here also as a rectangular building Best regards commented 2025-12-05 11:09:59 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 174514407 (Comments: 1) | 5mister7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jel jos zatvoren? Is it still closed? commented 2025-12-05 11:01:05 UTC by Branko Kokanovic ♦337 |
| 175538637 (Comments: 1) | magneticred (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. You are very productive. ! Please check if there is a shadow of the object you want to map as a building. When there is no shadow visible (at other buildings, yes), then it is mostly not a building and ought not t... commented 2025-12-05 10:59:31 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 171266023 (Comments: 1) | FeRo187 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Für die Markierung von Privatwegen gibt es access=private. access=no ist hier falsch. commented 2025-12-05 10:41:12 UTC by chris66 ♦424 |
| 173613422 (Comments: 3) | ciropom (Discussed changesets: 7) | Because I was there in those days, the statue was not there. I asked and some park-keeper told me that the statue was there only for the presentation to the community, and then moved to the tip of the park. But actually there is only the basament... commented 2025-12-05 10:40:13 UTC by ciropom ♦5 |
| 171391089 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 905) | hey mueschel, didn't got a reply, may you please reply? ty commented 2025-12-05 10:39:27 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦141 |
| 174322444 (Comments: 1) | kurai_no_akuma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, Vous avez récemment ajouté un quartier "Logement étudiant". Je ne pense pas qu'on puisse parler ici de "quartier". Est-ce que c'est le batiment qui contient des logements &eacut... commented 2025-12-05 10:27:43 UTC by Hervé TUC ♦45 |
| 175538065 (Comments: 1) | Nakaner (Discussed changesets: 177) | reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175541188 commented 2025-12-05 10:27:41 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,170 |
| 74783743 (Comments: 1) | Bahntech (Discussed changesets: 36) | Eigentlich müsste es doch Droyßig sein, oder? commented 2025-12-05 10:25:45 UTC by AlexSpritze ♦25 |
| 168326233 (Comments: 2) | danieldegroot2 (Discussed changesets: 156) | Changed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175541056 commented 2025-12-05 10:25:42 UTC by danieldegroot2 ♦704 |
| 171531671 (Comments: 3) | Wikilux (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hallo habi, nachdem nun 14 Tage vergangen sind, ohne dass eine Antwort von Wikilux kam, habe ich das Gebäude wieder hergestellt. Es ist im Übrigen auch auf swisstopo gut zu sehen. Gruss wies1 commented 2025-12-05 10:24:44 UTC by wies1 ♦172 |
| 175300838 (Comments: 1) | Laveure (Discussed changesets: 17) | The previous edits were correct, please refer to the following UN documents https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=08000002804cce54 https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/2017/09/20170925%2004-42%20PM/I-54672-Map-AnnexB-English.... commented 2025-12-05 10:22:22 UTC by kenken234 ♦36 |
| 174519061 (Comments: 15) | Protoxenus (Discussed changesets: 130) | Wie ist denn "umbauter Raum" definiert? Nach dieser Theorie müsste ein komplettes U-Bahnnetz auch ein "umbauter Raum" sein. Und ja, ein Teil des Gebäudes ist zweigeschossig, mit ein paar Lager- und Diensträumen, ... commented 2025-12-05 10:22:00 UTC by Protoxenus ♦323 |
| 151260696 (Comments: 1) | 8err (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5014085 commented 2025-12-05 10:16:42 UTC by RicoElectrico ♦1,783 |
| 167365362 (Comments: 2) | osm-ken (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the hint! commented 2025-12-05 10:14:10 UTC by osm-ken ♦1 |
| 175518454 (Comments: 3) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 16) | Ja det er korrekt. Tilgang kun til bådebroen. Resten af molen er mere eller mindre i stykker. commented 2025-12-05 10:12:36 UTC by FCO ♦3 |
| 175538049 (Comments: 5) | Puur Kip Breda (Discussed changesets: 2) | Wanneer je de naam nog niet ziet na rendering dan een beetjes schuiven en uitproberen. Die nummers zitten elkaar wel eens in de weg. commented 2025-12-05 09:54:50 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175197099 (Comments: 1) | Milan Batovsky (Discussed changesets: 24) | Adrese chýba správne addr:place môže byť Malé Stankovce Rozvadze Sedličná Veľké Stankovce commented 2025-12-05 09:49:54 UTC by Dodko ♦1,277 |
| 174999499 (Comments: 1) | Milan Batovsky (Discussed changesets: 24) | Adrese chýba vyplnené addr:place môže byť Skala Skalská Nová Ves Újazd commented 2025-12-05 09:48:51 UTC by Dodko ♦1,277 |
| 175532198 (Comments: 1) | lyctkel (Discussed changesets: 59) | Thanks commented 2025-12-05 09:48:24 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦822 |
| 175128323 (Comments: 1) | Milan Batovsky (Discussed changesets: 24) | adrese chýba vyplnená časť obce addr:place môže byť Melčice Zemianske Lieskové commented 2025-12-05 09:47:28 UTC by Dodko ♦1,277 |
| 175316574 (Comments: 1) | Milan Batovsky (Discussed changesets: 24) | adresa má nesprávne addr:place=Chocholná-Velčice môže byť len Chocholná Kykula Velčice commented 2025-12-05 09:44:44 UTC by Dodko ♦1,277 |
| 174438512 (Comments: 3) | pepsi_max2k (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ah sorry - I didn't directly change access, only permissions for motorbikes / motorcars / foot which were wrong in places (and corrected an issue with the sidewalk routing), but I think it automatically changed access tags too because of this. I... commented 2025-12-05 09:39:29 UTC by pepsi_max2k ♦6 |
| 175498305 (Comments: 2) | mcliquid (Discussed changesets: 206) | Thanks! Reverted commented 2025-12-05 09:34:40 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,987 |
| 165346079 (Comments: 1) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 131) | Do you think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4807749 is sufficient to delete that postbox? I see that you edited it just two months earlier commented 2025-12-05 09:19:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175357042 (Comments: 2) | ernstludes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ja, Gebäude existiert nicht mehr. Da ist jetzt ein Parkplatz commented 2025-12-05 09:18:12 UTC by ernstludes ♦1 |
| 175536875 (Comments: 1) | Puur Kip Breda (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welkom bij OSM. Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De format van de openingstijden klopt niet. De taal in OSM is UK English Gebruik anders deze tool: openingsuren-tool http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ MVG eggie commented 2025-12-05 08:54:21 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175530308 (Comments: 1) | Pingvin40 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Thanks for the work you put in this! However I think the area you created contains both taxiways and aprons: these should be separate areas. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aeroways Are you sure the surface is asphalt? It is often hard to ... commented 2025-12-05 08:51:08 UTC by rhhs ♦160 |
| 175535551 (Comments: 1) | AALICH (Discussed changesets: 1) | For a road, or other object which doesn't have an address in the conventional sense, the postal_code tag which you've already used is more appropriate. On roads, it's often truncated to just the postcode district (IG3). That... commented 2025-12-05 08:43:51 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 14440711 (Comments: 1) | BFX (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5079557 ? commented 2025-12-05 08:36:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 148079450 (Comments: 1) | hertipau (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256425997 ? commented 2025-12-05 08:36:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 127109454 (Comments: 1) | Nadjita (Discussed changesets: 51) | hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5079559 ? commented 2025-12-05 08:35:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 46422514 (Comments: 1) | janek_dz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Czy building:part=3 ma jakiś sens tutaj? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477331702/history commented 2025-12-05 08:35:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175536714 (Comments: 2) | wecvzxcvbzx (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19109 commented 2025-12-05 08:34:21 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175519129 (Comments: 1) | tecHORS (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1750806676134011 commented 2025-12-05 08:32:44 UTC by tecHORS ♦1 |
| 175481527 (Comments: 1) | Bonnzen-Trum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap Vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge zu den Daten. Ich habe eine Frage/Bitte, kannst Du, wenn Du es weißt, addr:postcode, addr:city und wenn vorhanden addr.suburb bei den Häusern eintra... commented 2025-12-05 08:31:07 UTC by berndw ♦632 |
| 175527041 (Comments: 1) | gwilliams2nd (Discussed changesets: 4) | (Review requested) Pedestrians are implicitly allowed on highway=cycleway ways in the UK, please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway#Foot_access_on_cycleways and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags... commented 2025-12-05 08:18:57 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 82368469 (Comments: 1) | EricRz512 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397729037/history has shop = Pizzeria that was added in this edit shop=Pizzeria ? Is it amenity=fast_food cuisine=pizza or amenity=restaurant cuisine=pizza by any chance? Or are they selling pizza not ready... commented 2025-12-05 08:12:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 152530349 (Comments: 1) | Lanostrafrutta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338400683/history has shop = fruit that was added in this edit shop=fruit ? Maybe shop=greengrocer was intended? If they truly sell solely only fruit then maybe extra tag like greengrocer=fruit would be bet... commented 2025-12-05 08:11:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 164918453 (Comments: 1) | DENelson83 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671676471/history has shop = fruit that was added in this edit shop=fruit ? Maybe shop=greengrocer was intended? If they truly sell solely only fruit then maybe extra tag like greengrocer=fruit would be bet... commented 2025-12-05 08:11:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 162669878 (Comments: 3) | Finalist1172 (Discussed changesets: 1) | No problem, such typos are normal. Thanks for a fix! commented 2025-12-05 08:10:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 170808600 (Comments: 3) | EPMPaul (Discussed changesets: 1) | glad to hear that this was useful! commented 2025-12-05 08:08:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 174981753 (Comments: 1) | Sovakin (Discussed changesets: 1) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-12-05 08:03:02 UTC by dypa ♦153 |
| 174495006 (Comments: 1) | Cartographer339 (Discussed changesets: 2) | При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra П... commented 2025-12-05 07:55:29 UTC by dypa ♦153 |
| 175530188 (Comments: 1) | FrancisEmmanuelCalingo (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted - this is TTC https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175535427 commented 2025-12-05 07:46:15 UTC by yelisey90 ♦211 |
| 175508838 (Comments: 1) | FrancisEmmanuelCalingo (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted - not all Bank of Georgia branches are branded as Solo, iD validation is faulty https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175535402 commented 2025-12-05 07:45:25 UTC by yelisey90 ♦211 |
| 175264568 (Comments: 5) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 564) | To samo wynika z tagów na drodze. Pisałem też, że droga jest na mojej liście. I inni też napisali, że trunk jest słuszny. Zdaje się, że Ty też mówiłeś, że tranzyt ciężarowy jest szczególnie ważny, może nawet waż... commented 2025-12-05 07:30:55 UTC by pavvv ♦592 |
| 175532394 (Comments: 2) | one_electro_dan (Discussed changesets: 4) | though note that building= themselves are currently not mapped and need to be added commented 2025-12-05 07:22:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175099318 (Comments: 1) | geoTD (Discussed changesets: 20) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19108 commented 2025-12-05 07:19:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 161393950 (Comments: 1) | BB-plan (Discussed changesets: 27) | Moin! Diese Änderung hat anscheinend einige ungültige Abbiegerelationen hinterlassen. Bitte entweder korrigieren oder löschen, falls nicht mehr nötig https://www.osm.org/relation/4252892 https://www.osm.org/relation/42528... commented 2025-12-05 07:02:29 UTC by GerdP ♦2,795 |
| 155296767 (Comments: 2) | momabebra (Discussed changesets: 101) | Hallo momabebra, die Bordsteine sind teilweise falsch herum erfasst. Die rechte Seite der Linie (in ID die Dreiecke) sollte zu Straße (also zur Seite mit dem Höhenabsatz) weisen. commented 2025-12-05 06:37:31 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,447 |
| 175517540 (Comments: 1) | Linus W Frische (Discussed changesets: 16) | Også fint med den. :) commented 2025-12-05 06:37:29 UTC by FCO ♦3 |
| 165399064 (Comments: 2) | ticho2 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Zdravim, PSC bez medzier je nejaky oficialne spravny format, alebo len osobna preferencia? Pytam sa lebo tu v OSM aspon v Bratislave a okoli vidavam prevazne PSC s medzerou. Osobne tam tu medzeru uprednostnujem, tak som bol nauceny, ale nie je... commented 2025-12-05 06:34:34 UTC by ticho2 ♦25 |
| 175532223 (Comments: 1) | 아나키 (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175532297 commented 2025-12-05 05:44:44 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175434233 (Comments: 1) | 아나키 (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175532297 commented 2025-12-05 05:44:44 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175390426 (Comments: 1) | 용인해실로 (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175532269 commented 2025-12-05 05:43:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175527416 (Comments: 1) | 용인해실로 (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175532269 commented 2025-12-05 05:43:16 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175530904 (Comments: 1) | zsdfaefea (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175532248 commented 2025-12-05 05:42:33 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175530966 (Comments: 2) | zsdfaefea (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175532248 commented 2025-12-05 05:42:33 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175526789 (Comments: 2) | 김제중 (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175532228 commented 2025-12-05 05:41:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175526860 (Comments: 1) | 김제중 (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175532228 commented 2025-12-05 05:41:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175526847 (Comments: 1) | 김제중 (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175532228 commented 2025-12-05 05:41:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175526825 (Comments: 1) | 김제중 (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175532228 commented 2025-12-05 05:41:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175526772 (Comments: 1) | 김제중 (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175532228 commented 2025-12-05 05:41:38 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 154537261 (Comments: 1) | 42RUS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Пожалуйста не удаляйте тег building со зданий - их же не снесли. Вводите новые теги поликлиник, детских садов и др. вручную в таблице. commented 2025-12-05 05:40:37 UTC by Dacha2 ♦2 |
| 175480492 (Comments: 1) | 112IRK (Discussed changesets: 3) | Здравствуйте, в OSM принято указывать полные названия без сокращений. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B... commented 2025-12-05 05:34:47 UTC by Grass-snake ♦249 |
| 175520889 (Comments: 1) | Netmaper (Discussed changesets: 71) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456117651 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-12-05 05:13:32 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175520646 (Comments: 1) | Netmaper (Discussed changesets: 71) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456116699 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-12-05 05:13:31 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175511751 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 59) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456080300 https://www.ope... commented 2025-12-05 05:13:27 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175522369 (Comments: 1) | Netmaper (Discussed changesets: 71) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1350431069 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-12-05 05:13:25 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 109048711 (Comments: 2) | Paul Grossman (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just to follow up, I don't think "Unknown Building" would be a good name for a building you don't know the type of or don't know the name of. If you don't know what type of building it is or don't know the building&... commented 2025-12-05 04:13:31 UTC by Frank Peng ♦46 |
| 164904625 (Comments: 1) | Justin1234 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Good commented 2025-12-05 03:34:29 UTC by 13 mG ♦1 |
| 173727957 (Comments: 1) | Isopycnic (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello, why did you 'change type' back on this way? Railroad does not exist here today commented 2025-12-05 03:32:06 UTC by rivermont ♦228 |
| 174165252 (Comments: 1) | CamelCityMapping (Discussed changesets: 6) | Please be careful about just clicking the buttons in iD editor. The entirety of Bent Creek Road is not a bridge. commented 2025-12-05 03:21:02 UTC by rivermont ♦228 |
| 175517961 (Comments: 3) | Apathetic_Engineer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yeah that'll definitely be the end state, though keeping it separate with landuse=construction may be appropriate for the time being. commented 2025-12-05 03:10:12 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦11 |
| 175468928 (Comments: 1) | muzics547 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19103 commented 2025-12-05 02:52:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175512945 (Comments: 2) | kenken234 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Oh wait, it's Marymount commented 2025-12-05 02:37:57 UTC by FajrAl ♦117 |
| 174886476 (Comments: 1) | Zoe Stanfill (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for your contribution! All footprints you mapped here represent buildings, though they could be more accurate. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates a... commented 2025-12-05 02:15:49 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175464170 (Comments: 6) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 15) | Okay, I took your advice and visited this area. What I found is a trail exactly where it was expected. (I'm talking about osm.org/way/526531575) The trail was visible enough that I had no problem running the whole thing back and forth, wi... commented 2025-12-05 02:14:40 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 175471716 (Comments: 2) | Marcus Batson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! I wasn't sure how to resolve the crossing warning but your information is helpful. commented 2025-12-05 02:00:43 UTC by Marcus Batson ♦1 |
| 175518451 (Comments: 1) | 0101010 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The link doesn't work on my end. commented 2025-12-05 01:32:15 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦140 |
| 175426606 (Comments: 2) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 12) | Agreed, but this one was a duplicate node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9155415177/ commented 2025-12-05 01:09:26 UTC by ICT_maps ♦9 |
| 175360441 (Comments: 1) | juprd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, All footprints you added here represent buildings, though they are generally oversized. Thank you for your contribution! When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimat... commented 2025-12-05 00:56:35 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175358209 (Comments: 1) | lparent (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OSM! All footprints you mapped here represent buildings, but generally you oversized them leading to data overlaps. Thank you for your contribution! When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accur... commented 2025-12-05 00:37:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 167034961 (Comments: 1) | JJC Mapping (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi there, Thanks for your mapping contributions! I just noticed that you (probably accidentally) deleted a bunch of paths and relations, including the paths on the north side of Springfield Road between Dorking Road and Middleborough Road. I�... commented 2025-12-05 00:35:15 UTC by philam48 ♦25 |
| 90596307 (Comments: 1) | JMWT (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi, I believe this land is Woodland Trust and cycling/horse riding is permitted, what is your source for bicycle=no and horse=no? Thanks commented 2025-12-05 00:19:42 UTC by letsridebikes ♦70 |
| 175526134 (Comments: 1) | catgirlseraid (Discussed changesets: 32) | I checked one line that could be connected to another. The rest is fine. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175526134 commented 2025-12-05 00:15:43 UTC by lekennedy ♦3 |
| 175506090 (Comments: 1) | run'n'ride (Discussed changesets: 17) | Why are you still doing this? You've been asked so many times to stop commented 2025-12-05 00:14:52 UTC by letsridebikes ♦70 |
| 175519697 (Comments: 1) | Megathos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Gracias por colaborar. Revisé tu adición de la escuela y tuve el atrevimiento de mejorarlo con el área correspondiente + los edificios lindantes. Cualquier error que puedas llegar a ver, eres bienvenido a mejorarlo o ... commented 2025-12-04 23:35:00 UTC by mweper ♦437 |
| 175483120 (Comments: 1) | zylu (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-12-04 23:32:08 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175476817 (Comments: 3) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 44) | OSM must reflect the world as it is not how you wish it was. The law is clear that cycling on pavements is prohibited; there is no exception for disabled people or children. And when folk rely on personal abuse to make a point it is a s... commented 2025-12-04 23:19:41 UTC by Pete Owens ♦73 |
| 175504464 (Comments: 1) | brookwalshy (Discussed changesets: 1) | The Q key will auto square building corners for you. It'll help you make nicer looking buildings. commented 2025-12-04 23:19:01 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦87 |
| 175510831 (Comments: 1) | Krzychu2003 (Discussed changesets: 2) | czemu kasujesz przejscie na linii? commented 2025-12-04 23:16:02 UTC by Yog Sot ♦368 |
| 175467192 (Comments: 6) | PeterK2003 (Discussed changesets: 1) | PeterK2003, there is no legal basis for you to request the deletion of accurate data from our database. You might just as well request your driveway be deleted from Google imagery or from your county's GIS database. The fact that your driveway i... commented 2025-12-04 23:12:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,493 |
| 175430278 (Comments: 7) | Kirstin Hams (Discussed changesets: 1) | I was using my phone sitting in my house and recorded the exact location I was in. This map doesnt show the houses on the property which is weird, there is lots of buildings on the property but the map doesnt show them which makes it hard for me to b... commented 2025-12-04 22:55:30 UTC by Kirstin Hams ♦1 |
| 175436778 (Comments: 2) | Pawelski44 (Discussed changesets: 51) | Wielka improwizacja na szybko z braku czasu https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175523085&zoom=14&lat=49.92506&lon=20.77824 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1754... commented 2025-12-04 22:46:36 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦574 |
| 174154221 (Comments: 4) | g_turri (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, today I saw I forgot a typo and two accents. Corrected text below also to add: ref:FR:MemorialGenWeb=61714 So this will automatically link to https://https://www.memorialgenweb.org/memorial3/html/fr/resultcommune.php?idsource=61714 |
| 175496672 (Comments: 1) | Runn1ngRampant (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the web site hours for the Moore Park Beach clinic has it closed on Sat and open on Sun. commented 2025-12-04 22:34:59 UTC by nevw ♦2,087 |
| 174037180 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 59) | Paczkomat to przecież nie jest budynek commented 2025-12-04 22:23:28 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦822 |
| 174836736 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 165) | hii, i saw that you've mapped some rail signals too, just FYI these signals are rendered on OpenRailwayMap now: https://openrailwaymap.app/#view=15.14/-36.847844/174.780768&style=signals pretty much everything in https://osm.wiki/New ... commented 2025-12-04 22:05:21 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦426 |
| 162268157 (Comments: 11) | End0fLine (Discussed changesets: 11) | Just added a description about the bus loop on the service road ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580976575 ) commented 2025-12-04 22:02:24 UTC by TheNightRider ♦35 |
| 175241111 (Comments: 3) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | The grey shading shows the area of the bridge. When you look a imagery you see https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&changeset=175241111#map=20/40.9333128/-73.7599364 , which doesn't correspond to the co-ordinates you mention? Where d... commented 2025-12-04 21:58:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175454503 (Comments: 1) | Benny21815 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi Benny, We've discussed this with you several times in the past. You are deleting valid map objects that belong to relations and are recreating the objects (fairways typically) from scratch leaving broken multipolygon definitions around... commented 2025-12-04 21:58:32 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 117942100 (Comments: 4) | HirschKauz (Discussed changesets: 33) | Ist noch unbenutzt* commented 2025-12-04 21:36:27 UTC by iboalali ♦1 |
| 172838165 (Comments: 2) | tilsti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für den Hinweis, Michael, wir sind im Sommer ein Stück den Rheinradweg geradelt, bei der Gelegenheit habe ich ein paar (wenige) Strecken gemappt, weil in openstreetmap.org ab Weil am Rhein Richtung Norden EV15 nicht angezeigt wird.... commented 2025-12-04 21:31:46 UTC by tilsti ♦1 |
| 175175671 (Comments: 1) | axlr99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for your contributions! Was the building to the south deliberately deleted? In general it's preferred to adjust existing ways/nodes rather than deleting and remapping. This maintains history of the object. commented 2025-12-04 21:18:02 UTC by JoeG ♦36 |
| 175502433 (Comments: 2) | Michał3464 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oraz ciekawe jak potwierdziłeś te adresy za pomocą ortofotomapy... commented 2025-12-04 21:17:11 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦822 |
| 175519664 (Comments: 1) | HirschKauz (Discussed changesets: 33) | ups - zu schnell gespeichert CS Comment: deleted based on a comment on a former CS 117942100 commented 2025-12-04 21:15:44 UTC by HirschKauz ♦274 |
| 175498805 (Comments: 1) | Diez Hombre (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, ¿qué razón hay para haber borrado "building:levels=2" y "height=6"? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175498805 commented 2025-12-04 21:04:58 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦361 |
| 134540189 (Comments: 4) | Der Wilderer (Discussed changesets: 72) | Der A5 ist ein Ahdener Wanderweg. Mus also heißen Ahden A5. VG commented 2025-12-04 21:04:57 UTC by Lars Runte ♦2 |
| 175497869 (Comments: 1) | Diez Hombre (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola, ¿qué razón hay para haber borrado "building:leveles=5" y "height=15"? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175497869 commented 2025-12-04 21:04:20 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦361 |
| 26548285 (Comments: 1) | bielebog (Discussed changesets: 106) | Korrekt wäre Büren-Ahden commented 2025-12-04 20:57:57 UTC by Lars Runte ♦2 |
| 174565044 (Comments: 2) | dvlpmnt (Discussed changesets: 21) | its in the description: sentinel2 imagery commented 2025-12-04 20:56:03 UTC by dvlpmnt ♦5 |
| 175514173 (Comments: 1) | Bharath Kumar AR (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Th... commented 2025-12-04 20:51:48 UTC by Norbert Dichter ♦101 |
| 175518201 (Comments: 1) | I-76 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Surveyed with video capture commented 2025-12-04 20:44:19 UTC by I-76 ♦40 |
| 174765075 (Comments: 2) | dwbz-nm (Discussed changesets: 10) | Habe es mal in eine Treppe geändert commented 2025-12-04 20:42:08 UTC by cuzi ♦136 |
| 175240922 (Comments: 4) | ziomio (Discussed changesets: 20) | Capito, grazie mille per la spiegazione! commented 2025-12-04 20:41:05 UTC by edobenfe ♦1 |
| 175453704 (Comments: 1) | Agent300 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. In this edit you also dragged intersection node a few houses over. I fixed this. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175453704 commented 2025-12-04 20:37:47 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175517145 (Comments: 1) | SYG34 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Th... commented 2025-12-04 20:34:36 UTC by Norbert Dichter ♦101 |
| 175461607 (Comments: 1) | Agent300 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. When mapping features please be careful when panning the map around. In this edit you seemed to accidentally dragged a road a few blocks over. I'll fix this, but in the future, please be pay attention on the changeset submission... commented 2025-12-04 20:27:52 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175488530 (Comments: 2) | StarLine_support (Discussed changesets: 2) | Углы здания уже выпрямлены https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175517339 commented 2025-12-04 20:26:57 UTC by Danil Moiseenko ♦20 |
| 145690882 (Comments: 3) | barnes38 (Discussed changesets: 24) | amélioré oui :) mais je pensais qu'il y avait un problème à résoudre dans tous les cas merci pour ton retour et ton ajout, car c'est celui-ci qui m'a permit d'ajouter les données de ... commented 2025-12-04 20:25:56 UTC by frosm ♦1,153 |
| 175469289 (Comments: 1) | JettJohnsonSFNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | driveways should be tagged as highway=service +service=driveway. Can you correct? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175469289 commented 2025-12-04 20:23:29 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 174344479 (Comments: 2) | Urednik2020 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Isto tako ovo ime "Purcarev sor" nema u RGZ-u, tako da cu prebaciti u loc_name commented 2025-12-04 20:22:16 UTC by Branko Kokanovic ♦337 |
| 175469051 (Comments: 1) | JettJohnsonSFNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | The best way is to just put a barrier= node on the way to prevent routers from use it as a thoughfare. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175469051 commented 2025-12-04 20:22:09 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175468967 (Comments: 1) | JettJohnsonSFNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | That appears to be just a service (driveway) than a track. I made the change, let me know if you disagree. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175468967 commented 2025-12-04 20:20:46 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175459622 (Comments: 1) | JettJohnsonSFNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175459622 commented 2025-12-04 20:14:36 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175458193 (Comments: 1) | wtseo (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: the node with tag barrier= is not needed since you added the fence way --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175458193 commented 2025-12-04 20:11:54 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175457938 (Comments: 1) | wtseo (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: the addr=* is not needed since the building is tagged with an address. Router will take you to the closes way to the address. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175457938 ... commented 2025-12-04 20:10:35 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
 | 175324411 (Comments: 3) | joserrg12 (Discussed changesets: 2478) | *Interamenricana Sur commented 2025-12-04 20:05:40 UTC by joserrg12 ♦9 |
| 175511804 (Comments: 1) | N0bodyInParticular (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Thanks for making change on the map. If a building isn't there anymore, you can delete it instead of changing the name like this. If there's construction happening (or another building in its place), feel free to map it to the be... commented 2025-12-04 20:05:29 UTC by iandees ♦758 |
| 171889634 (Comments: 1) | caitnahc (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thank you for all your good work improving the map. You have mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172193768, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171938146, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4956905 as "sidewalk=separate" but no... commented 2025-12-04 20:04:25 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 175510242 (Comments: 1) | RRS1980 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Platany powinieneś dac nazwe łacińską tutaj masz rozbudowany zestaw tagów dla przykładu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12589728514 lub https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8432374370 a centralny rejestr pewno... commented 2025-12-04 20:00:20 UTC by Yog Sot ♦368 |
| 175509500 (Comments: 1) | salma fr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, these buildings were also already mapped so no need to add another one on top of them. There's also no need to name a bâtiment, well, "bâtiment". https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175515681 commented 2025-12-04 19:55:25 UTC by ilias_ ♦376 |
| 175508661 (Comments: 1) | salma fr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, welcome to OSM. These buildings where already mapped, no need to add another one on top of them. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175515617 commented 2025-12-04 19:54:20 UTC by ilias_ ♦376 |
| 175504332 (Comments: 1) | Coumbadiabira (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tip for the future: when mapping squared buildings like these, select each building and click Q. This makes the buildings look nice and squared. Welcome to OSM! commented 2025-12-04 19:52:41 UTC by ilias_ ♦376 |
| 170316684 (Comments: 2) | LeuvenNeedsTrams2 (Discussed changesets: 5) | I get carried away sometimes. I'll keep in mind to do smaller, more coherent changes. Thanks for the feedback! commented 2025-12-04 19:51:21 UTC by LeuvenNeedsTrams2 ♦5 |
| 175493438 (Comments: 3) | AndyB_66 (Discussed changesets: 33) | Dla jasności - mi takie drogi construction, na obszarze na którym faktycznie są prace budowlane, dodatkowo na "pustkowiu" - nie przeszkadzają. W tym miejscu po prostu nikt ich jeszcze prawidłowo nie wprowadził. commented 2025-12-04 19:48:33 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,330 |
| 170900133 (Comments: 4) | LeuvenNeedsTrams2 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Corrected in 175515211 commented 2025-12-04 19:48:09 UTC by LeuvenNeedsTrams2 ♦5 |
| 175355619 (Comments: 5) | maraf24 (Discussed changesets: 619) | Jeśli ktoś chce, to sobie może te drogi tam oznaczyć jako construction, mi to nie przeszkadza. Ja uważam, że lepiej to zrobić później, gdy jakiś kształt przyszłych dróg zaczyna być widoczny w terenie. Wiem, że większoś... commented 2025-12-04 19:44:44 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,330 |
| 172259037 (Comments: 3) | LeuvenNeedsTrams2 (Discussed changesets: 5) | As far as I remember it does continue to the underground parking entrace, bit it is only paint a that point, not a proper cycle path. It has been years since I was last there, though. Thanks for the feedback! commented 2025-12-04 19:34:47 UTC by LeuvenNeedsTrams2 ♦5 |
| 174455732 (Comments: 2) | LeuvenNeedsTrams2 (Discussed changesets: 5) | I've just attempted to correct it in changeset 175514441. Thanks for the feedback! commented 2025-12-04 19:29:59 UTC by LeuvenNeedsTrams2 ♦5 |
| 150291536 (Comments: 3) | aseigo (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks again for your kind reply and for your contributions! P.S. LOL I admit it's super-difficult to map here since there are NO street lamps at all... lost in the darkness lol... See you around! cheers commented 2025-12-04 19:25:08 UTC by Valerio_Bozzolan ♦28 |
| 175470518 (Comments: 1) | Murali3 (Discussed changesets: 17) | does the address for this building have Southwest 26th Street or Southwest 25th Court as the road (addr:street) of the address, aka what is the addr:street of the address? Just adding addr:housenumber is not enough as it is not a full address. commented 2025-12-04 19:10:21 UTC by Udarian ♦537 |
| 175416746 (Comments: 2) | vipas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Děkuji za odezvu a opravu. vipas commented 2025-12-04 19:04:26 UTC by vipas ♦1 |
| 175512156 (Comments: 1) | rromitr (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. Es un place=neighbourhood Puede ser agregado como nodo o como área en el mismo landuse= que modifica, si es que acaso ésta es conocida. saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2025-12-04 18:56:44 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175512498 (Comments: 1) | traveleditor (Discussed changesets: 49) | thank you! commented 2025-12-04 18:55:13 UTC by mbela ♦6 |
| 175418251 (Comments: 1) | geowas (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hallo geowas, ich denke, place=locality ist hier aus verschiedenen Gründen falsch. Zum einen handelt es sich bei der Kunstinstallation um keine Örtlichkeit im Sinne der tag-Definition. Zum anderen existiert der in der Installation benann... commented 2025-12-04 18:53:36 UTC by delineatorix ♦27 |
| 175504367 (Comments: 1) | traveleditor (Discussed changesets: 49) | This update should be added as an 'alt_name', rather than the change of the 'name' or 'name:en'. commented 2025-12-04 18:47:14 UTC by mbela ♦6 |
| 174034196 (Comments: 1) | vgwosm (Discussed changesets: 1) | der Laabenbach wurde nun irrtümlich ein einziger langer Rohrdurchlass - was hätte hier gemacht werden sollen? commented 2025-12-04 18:37:23 UTC by kuhni74 ♦402 |
| 175439285 (Comments: 3) | Calibrator (Discussed changesets: 31) | ну, тут же в заметке написано, что здание уже в процессе сноса... то есть "от нескольких дней до полугода" уже позади commented 2025-12-04 18:31:11 UTC by literan ♦6,895 |
| 175504282 (Comments: 1) | PetraPu (Discussed changesets: 1) | It looks like you both appropriately and inappropriately copy and pasted footprints here. I recommend doing this if the buildings truly have the same geometry e.g. the row of metal roofed buildings in the Southern cluster. However some other footprin... commented 2025-12-04 18:24:16 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175257591 (Comments: 2) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance I'm curious I don't see anywhere where it says anything about lowercase and upper case. And then another osm is adding gantry when there is no mention of it. Can you ex... commented 2025-12-04 18:23:36 UTC by 01345790 ♦2 |
| 175487318 (Comments: 1) | AllTech Construction (Discussed changesets: 1) | I reverted this edit. You replaced a nearby highway with a barrier. Please, do the built-in tutorial and try again. Additionally, google maps cannot be used as a source for edits to OSM. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175511189 commented 2025-12-04 18:23:28 UTC by citrula ♦974 |
| 173684427 (Comments: 1) | GustavoE (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hola. El Parque, como pocos en Chile, tiene dirección. Con número y calle. Quizás la borraste por error. La vuelvo a agregar. Saludos commented 2025-12-04 18:22:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175504292 (Comments: 1) | iGor@ (Discussed changesets: 2) | The footprints you mapped here represent buildings, but you created invalid shared nodes while doing so. Thank you for your contribution! Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways o... commented 2025-12-04 18:14:12 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175504300 (Comments: 1) | EduardTr (Discussed changesets: 3) | All footprints you mapped here represent buildings. You did an excellent job working with the existing data by deleting the footprints which you could tell represented no longer existing buildings, while preserving the one that you were able to ident... commented 2025-12-04 18:10:17 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 174577957 (Comments: 5) | matty817 (Discussed changesets: 7) | The tags were added by mistake and have since been fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175477758 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175510217. commented 2025-12-04 18:05:32 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 173961876 (Comments: 3) | Loshu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Thank you for fixing this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175477758 - I have also fixed another case of the same problem in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175510217. commented 2025-12-04 18:04:49 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 175504342 (Comments: 1) | EduardTr (Discussed changesets: 3) | Good attempt at mapping this partially obscured building. I do not think it is as big as you've mapped it though. Look at the paths in the imagery and note how they would overlap this building, if it were in fact so large. See how I mapped it in... commented 2025-12-04 18:01:25 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175509895 (Comments: 1) | ziomio (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://myportal-cf882-nrc-prod.apps.nrc.lepida.it/myportal/C_F882/api/content/download?id=62c498c45d698400994fd573 commented 2025-12-04 17:58:56 UTC by ziomio ♦19 |
| 175509985 (Comments: 1) | ziomio (Discussed changesets: 20) | https://myportal-cf882-nrc-prod.apps.nrc.lepida.it/myportal/C_F882/api/content/download?id=62c498c45d698400994fd573 commented 2025-12-04 17:58:04 UTC by ziomio ♦19 |
| 175509910 (Comments: 1) | pokakukam (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.toponimika.spb.ru/vse-toponimy-spb/ofitsialnye-resheniya-o-prisvoenii-naimenovanij-obektov-na-territorii-sankt-peterburga/item/download/544_d11025dfc1c2486a307f1311b9edda07.html commented 2025-12-04 17:57:13 UTC by pokakukam ♦1 |
| 175475032 (Comments: 1) | Freiwillige Feuerwehr Tengen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, bitte die Namen entfernen. Das emergency=suction_point in Verbindung mit water_source=groundwater bedeutet, dass es sich um einen Brunnen handelt, bei dem der Grundwasserspiegel per Saugleitung und Saugkorb erreichbar ist. Passt d... commented 2025-12-04 17:55:26 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
| 175455511 (Comments: 2) | KelsonV (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks for catching that! I must have just clicked the wrong number of times. Yeah, none of the residential/residential intersections in the grid between 190th and Robinson and between Aviation and Inglewood has islands, just some of the bigge... commented 2025-12-04 17:53:31 UTC by KelsonV ♦7 |
| 175475554 (Comments: 1) | Freiwillige Feuerwehr Tengen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, auch hier: die Namen müssten raus. emergency=suction_point ist eigentlich nur eine Wasserentnahmestelle aus Flüssen oder Teichen. Bei fest verrohrten Saustellen greift das fire_hydrant oder water_tank. Viele Gr&uu... commented 2025-12-04 17:51:47 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
| 175504358 (Comments: 1) | mjirka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Why did you delete these footprints? If you delete a fair number of features its good to provide your rationale in a changeset comment so others know why you did something. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank y... commented 2025-12-04 17:51:31 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175476119 (Comments: 1) | Freiwillige Feuerwehr Tengen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12719640019 müsstest du noch einmal schauen: emergency=water_tank und water_source=water_tank passen nicht zusammen; so hätte der Löschwasserbehälter sich selbst als Quelle.... commented 2025-12-04 17:46:20 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
| 175504365 (Comments: 1) | Jarouch01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, the footprints you mapped here represent buildings, but I see 3 main mistakes. 1. they could be more accurate. 2. they haven't been squared. 3. You created invalid shared nodes. The following feedback may seem q... commented 2025-12-04 17:42:09 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 170943581 (Comments: 5) | AurélienQ (Discussed changesets: 60) | Je suis d'accord avec toi. Cependant, ce n'était pas l'objet de ce changeset, et je t'avoue que je ne suis pas trop sur OSM en ce moment. Je laisse donc ce travail à quelqu'un d'autre commented 2025-12-04 17:39:47 UTC by AurélienQ ♦146 |
| 175452832 (Comments: 1) | w_djatmiko (Discussed changesets: 15) | Mas, tolong bersihkan dulu impor barunya. Ini banyak nama ajaib kayak "Unknown Point Feature" (n13351573244), "Kantor Geuchik/Kepala Desa..." (n13351573282), "Rumah/Kantor Dusun..." (n13351573271), "Kantor Sekretari... commented 2025-12-04 17:39:19 UTC by Farras ♦56 |
 | 175376462 (Comments: 2) | BubbleTea888 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Must be a big glacier commented 2025-12-04 17:39:16 UTC by SuperBurrito ♦1 |
| 175481234 (Comments: 1) | Freiwillige Feuerwehr Tengen (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hallo, du hast hier einen Bachlauf gelöscht. Ich habe den Änderungssatz revertiert, dabei habe ich auch die Löschwasserbehälter "im Bach" entfernt. Viele Grüße commented 2025-12-04 17:35:56 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
 | 175499241 (Comments: 1) | IsaiasGS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gracias, excelente aporte. Te sugiero usar tambien la aplicacion MAPILLARY, para aportar con fotos al mapa. Saludos JJ commented 2025-12-04 17:34:29 UTC by JJIglesias ♦1,220 |
| 175448105 (Comments: 1) | Michael Mikshis (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thank you for your contribution. The names of bus stops have to match the sign. They are pulled from the GTFS database from the ministry of transportation. Please let me know if the name on the sign is different from the one mapped. |
| 175507910 (Comments: 1) | Lejun (Discussed changesets: 79) | thanks, will add to my list of index of unexpected valid combinations commented 2025-12-04 17:28:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175493902 (Comments: 1) | neffets02 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Numerische maxspeed-Angaben an highway=living_street sollten nicht genutzt werden, einzig die Angabe „walk“ gäbe di... commented 2025-12-04 17:24:40 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
| X | 175441962 (Comments: 2) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 28) | Sorry, it's a mistake I've made in JOSM. I have selected in taginfo all the traffic_sign that used to have traffic_sign=yield and changed them to traffic_sign=give_way : https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:france/tags/traffic_sign=yield ... commented 2025-12-04 17:19:54 UTC by K12230LF ♦36 |
| 175504379 (Comments: 1) | appleczech (Discussed changesets: 4) | All footprints represent buildings. I would have mapped the round footprints as square in this case. It looks like on occasion you enveloped multiple buildings with one footprint. some footprints here are oversized. Thank you for your contribu... commented 2025-12-04 17:19:05 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175504378 (Comments: 1) | JakHan (Discussed changesets: 2) | All but one footprint here appear valid. The other I would map as two seperate buildings. Please regularise the shapes after tagging when appropriate. Thank you for your contribution! After tracing and tagging features which are likely... commented 2025-12-04 17:13:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175113286 (Comments: 1) | Batik27 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour Batik27. A priori ce changeset a supprimé la liaison entre la Rue de Paris et la Rue Amiral Guépratte. Etait-ce voulu ? La rue au-dessus, a priori Esplanade des Anciens Combattants a également disparu d'OpenStree... commented 2025-12-04 17:13:14 UTC by K12230LF ♦36 |
| 175504387 (Comments: 1) | Martin Subert (Discussed changesets: 1) | All footpritns here represent buildings accurately, if they were ever so slightly smaller they'd be as accurate as the imagery allows. Thank you for your contribution! When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Ac... commented 2025-12-04 17:10:21 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175503865 (Comments: 1) | Jordi MF (Discussed changesets: 85) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-12-04 17:08:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175504399 (Comments: 1) | Juraj41 (Discussed changesets: 1) | All footprints represent buildings, but could be more accurate. It looks like you enveloped multiple buildings with individual footprints. Thank you for your contribution! Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this ... commented 2025-12-04 17:05:10 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175403061 (Comments: 4) | Mobi-Herent (Discussed changesets: 1) | Perfect, merci! commented 2025-12-04 17:02:55 UTC by djsa ♦26 |
| 175504417 (Comments: 1) | Nikca (Discussed changesets: 1) | All footprints you added here represent buildings, please take care to exclude the shadows cast on the ground and regularise the shapes after tagging. Thank you for your contribution! When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accu... commented 2025-12-04 17:01:59 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175505668 (Comments: 1) | EduardTr (Discussed changesets: 3) | You identified and mapped buildings just map them slightly smaller than the roof you see in future. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175505668 commented 2025-12-04 16:59:19 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 168764618 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste las 18 casas que estaban por la carrera 2? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168764618 (En rojo están resaltadas la casas que eliminaste) commented 2025-12-04 16:58:28 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 117231215 (Comments: 1) | Heyra (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hey, I've noticed a lot of parking:lane:left=no in this area added by you. How come? commented 2025-12-04 16:58:04 UTC by wielandb ♦140 |
| 168934524 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, no se deben eliminar elementos y volverlos a crear el elemento eliminado https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967665095 no se debió volver a crear https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414716267 lo que se debe hacer es modificar el elemen... commented 2025-12-04 16:52:27 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175504443 (Comments: 1) | LenkaSeenan (Discussed changesets: 2) | The footpritns I flagged appear to have been moved to represent different buildings than they originally did. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175504443 commented 2025-12-04 16:51:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175504471 (Comments: 3) | Honziiiiik (Discussed changesets: 2) | The vast makority of footprints here represent buildings, but some could be more accurate. Here Bing happens to show the same scene as ESRI so you could align Bing to ESRI and map using it when that's the case. --- ... commented 2025-12-04 16:47:48 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175505882 (Comments: 1) | Comino (Discussed changesets: 38) | Detail-tag does not exist. Tag deleted. Wrong opening hours syntax. Fixed Added two extra tags. commented 2025-12-04 16:46:56 UTC by Comino ♦266 |
| 175504682 (Comments: 1) | JustLikeBitcoin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Advertising is not allowed on OSM. description-tag deleted. Detail-tag does not exist. Tag deleted. commented 2025-12-04 16:43:41 UTC by Comino ♦266 |
| 175436476 (Comments: 7) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 66) | dlaczego twoim zdaniem jeśli nie ma linii ciągłej to nie może być _link? commented 2025-12-04 16:41:08 UTC by stasiu512 ♦205 |
| 175504455 (Comments: 1) | MichalCZECH (Discussed changesets: 1) | All footprints you added here represent buildings in the imagery, but please take care to not include the shadows cast on the ground in the size of footprints. Thank you for your contribution! When mapping buildings, please trace the s... commented 2025-12-04 16:39:56 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175504463 (Comments: 1) | appleczech (Discussed changesets: 4) | All footpritns here look valid but the NE one is oversized. Thank you for your contribution! When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data ... commented 2025-12-04 16:38:15 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 170587388 (Comments: 1) | Tigran Asaturjan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Te maxspeed pielikās administratīvajai robežai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74158162 :) Iesaku iD izslēgt robežu slāni, lai netraucē, jo tas tik un tā importēts un to gandrīz nekad nav jāaiztiek. commented 2025-12-04 16:37:24 UTC by HellMap ♦767 |
| X | 175420232 (Comments: 4) | Sharko_J (Discussed changesets: 43) | ohhhhh I was trying to test something, I did not mean for it to get published commented 2025-12-04 16:37:03 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 175504473 (Comments: 1) | Sára Branická (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for taking care to preserve the history, however take care not to mix it either. Deletions are appropriate if the feature either has ceased to or has never existed. Cross-reference bing and see that some buildings no longer exist and should... commented 2025-12-04 16:36:59 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175452138 (Comments: 1) | 123johndoe123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahoj, system integrovanej dopravy bol uz davnejsie premenovany na "IDS Plus", nakolko sa rozsiril aj na uzemie Trencianskeho kraja. Preto prosim oprav svoje premenovanie na stary nazov, kedze "IDS Plus" je spravna hodnota. <... commented 2025-12-04 16:31:40 UTC by t_ja ♦225 |
| 175465275 (Comments: 1) | Leo Z Huang (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have changed the way to a drive way rather than a residential road, thank you for improving the map! commented 2025-12-04 16:30:30 UTC by Fen <3 ♦8 |
| 175446969 (Comments: 3) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 69) | Agree, although quite likely the next mapper will be me visiting my mother-in-law for Christmas... commented 2025-12-04 16:30:19 UTC by rhhs ♦160 |
| 174787454 (Comments: 2) | kpedido (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi kpedido, der Zigarettenautomat 13311650802 in diesem Änderungssatz sieht nach einer Dublette aus. Im Änderungssatz 174787342 wurde mit gleichen Koordinaten auch ein Zigarettenautomat 13311631715 angelegt. Der Änderungssatz ha... commented 2025-12-04 16:28:59 UTC by Steine42 ♦4 |
| 175503238 (Comments: 1) | LenkaSeenan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your contribution! When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom i... commented 2025-12-04 16:26:30 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175503242 (Comments: 1) | Honziiiiik (Discussed changesets: 2) | All buildings added here look valid, but could be more accurately mapped; some are oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlap... commented 2025-12-04 16:21:47 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175503239 (Comments: 1) | Petr Lukeš (Discussed changesets: 1) | Was this an accidental edit? You can filter out features which are getting in your way via the map data panel `u` in ID. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175503239 commented 2025-12-04 16:20:32 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175503243 (Comments: 1) | MichalR3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | You may wish to compare the SE footpritns with Bing. The southern most one I would map as two buildings. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175503243 commented 2025-12-04 16:18:30 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175172079 (Comments: 2) | dpolovinkin (Discussed changesets: 45) | hi, there were no int_name there, so added en, but thx for the info, will know! but a question then - where is this convention defined? I open "name" page in wiki in Greek (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/El:Key:name) and even th... commented 2025-12-04 16:17:04 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦357 |
| 175503258 (Comments: 1) | Kateřina Králová (Discussed changesets: 3) | the footprints I flagged include a yard. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175503258 commented 2025-12-04 16:13:50 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 158296605 (Comments: 4) | pb07 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Oui, je me suis trompé, c'était pas pour l'escalier que j'avais coupé, c'était pour construire la relation Meyras - Château d'Hautsegur du réseau de randonnée. commented 2025-12-04 16:11:33 UTC by pb07 ♦6 |
 | 175493080 (Comments: 2) | 市川ゆり子 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The above does not appear to be an english name, both name-tags appear to be finnish names. One of them should probably be alt_name, but I'm not sure. Also this is not correct, name:en -key should be removed, it is duplicate of the street... commented 2025-12-04 16:11:33 UTC by Sakari_N ♦99 |
| 175502637 (Comments: 1) | Sára Branická (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your contribution! You isentified buildings, but some could be more accurate. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data o... commented 2025-12-04 16:11:25 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175502639 (Comments: 1) | JakHan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your contribution! You identified buildings, but they could be more accurately mapped. After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`,... commented 2025-12-04 16:07:19 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175502646 (Comments: 1) | Kateřina Králová (Discussed changesets: 3) | You identified buildings in the imagery, mostly they are accurately mapped, just take care to exclude shadows on the ground and yards from the footprints. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/ch... commented 2025-12-04 16:05:32 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175501972 (Comments: 2) | Vavrinec (Discussed changesets: 3) | @[Vavrinec] you identified and mapped buildings in the imagery. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the ori... commented 2025-12-04 15:59:53 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175474040 (Comments: 1) | MapMenMan (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13352609682 Electricity poles should be tagged power=pole. :) Telecom and other poles can be tagged man_made=utility_pole commented 2025-12-04 15:45:39 UTC by VictorIE ♦973 |
| 175442445 (Comments: 2) | mapperue (Discussed changesets: 283) | Tu je oficiálna mapa komunikácií mesta Žilina, ktorá zobrazuje triedy jednotlivých miestnych komunikácií. II. mestský okruh a mestské radiály sú v nej označené ako ... commented 2025-12-04 15:45:23 UTC by Ajper ♦5 |
| 92059329 (Comments: 1) | Grola (Discussed changesets: 10) | Bonjour, peux-tu vérifier ta source pour le nom osm.org/way/555281892/history/3#map=19/44.680724/4.267268 ? un autre contributeur qui a été sur place dit que cela se nome autrement osm.org/note/4821786#map=19/44.680872/4.26... commented 2025-12-04 15:38:51 UTC by frosm ♦1,153 |
| 55695337 (Comments: 2) | bagage (Discussed changesets: 23) | et en plus je lis mal l'historique vu que tu avais mis le bon nom et que c'est un autre qui a changé le nom :) j'écris à l'autre contributeur commented 2025-12-04 15:37:33 UTC by frosm ♦1,153 |
| 175500459 (Comments: 1) | ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist (Discussed changesets: 6) | Before anybody comments, this bus route is PUBLICLY operated by the Municipality of Strathroy-Caradoc and the Cities of Sarnia & London. I am NOT making any privately operated bus routes in this map (eg: Megabus, Flixbus) as it ruins the ... commented 2025-12-04 15:25:09 UTC by ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist ♦12 |
| 175037791 (Comments: 1) | Dawid2849 (Discussed changesets: 194) | W sumie racja, dzięki za poprawkę! commented 2025-12-04 15:19:56 UTC by Ziemowit Zabawa ♦35 |
| 175412972 (Comments: 2) | Jonasklh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Takk, var usikker på den, ja! commented 2025-12-04 15:18:00 UTC by Jonasklh ♦1 |
| 174869983 (Comments: 1) | AnnetteCL2025 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Well mapped. However, you overlooked the brownish/gray buildings. Straw covered buildings. I mapped them. Best regards commented 2025-12-04 15:14:58 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175382227 (Comments: 16) | hahae (Discussed changesets: 6) | 生命周期/状态命名空间前缀可用于标注具有诸如proposed（提议）, planned（规划）, construction（建设）, disused（弃用）, abandoned（废弃）, demolished（拆除）, historic（历史）状态的对象。另见生... commented 2025-12-04 15:13:57 UTC by 漣澪靈 ♦2 |
| 174883190 (Comments: 1) | Scott Scoville (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. When you map paths and highways, don't forget to tag them in accordance with the guidelines. Here, you did not tag them. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-12-04 15:10:57 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 174996289 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 11) | It looks like you edited or adjusted the commercial area in this changeset rather than just "Add" it since you already added it. commented 2025-12-04 15:10:17 UTC by Frank Peng ♦46 |
| 174869971 (Comments: 1) | DaleLUC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping here. When you map buildings in a settlement, please also map the gray/brownish rectangular and round buildings. Best regards commented 2025-12-04 15:06:45 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175495624 (Comments: 1) | Mr ŁOZO (Discussed changesets: 2) | Błąd, dojazd do posesji z numerem 1G musi być service commented 2025-12-04 15:02:42 UTC by Szymson ♦446 |
| 175425092 (Comments: 5) | MoG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes, this seems to have worked as intended. commented 2025-12-04 15:01:03 UTC by mueschel ♦6,746 |
| 174357801 (Comments: 1) | Tre_brock (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, thanks for working on this area. I removed the name of this school area, see comment on changeset 175498800. commented 2025-12-04 14:54:13 UTC by jhuang97 ♦13 |
| 175449595 (Comments: 5) | NTUllswatervalleyPaths (Discussed changesets: 4) | Great. I’ve made the changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175498881 No worries, one of the great things about OSM is that things can always be changed again to improve them. If you could leave a bit more contextual info in ... commented 2025-12-04 14:54:01 UTC by gurglypipe ♦953 |
| 175431060 (Comments: 1) | csap4831 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo! Bitte schau Dir nochmal das Gebäude https://www.osm.org/way/1455697689 an (12 weitere Objekte dieser Art vorhanden). Was bedeuten die Tags BEZEICHNUN = Wohngebäude GEBAEUDEAR = 1000.0 GEBAEUDEFU = 1000.0 GML_ID = DEBYvAAA... commented 2025-12-04 14:45:26 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175458169 (Comments: 1) | aytfadc (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1451568117. What is the mean of the tag 0 = 120? commented 2025-12-04 14:30:18 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175228783 (Comments: 1) | BIMOAW96 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. More work is required to complete this task and ensure that it is well mapped: * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings int... commented 2025-12-04 14:17:40 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175472078 (Comments: 1) | tkotnala_lyft (Discussed changesets: 9) | Your spelling could use some work, as you misspelled "left|through|through;right". --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175472078 commented 2025-12-04 14:15:35 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175229264 (Comments: 1) | Aradrin (Discussed changesets: 27) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. More work is required to complete this task and ensure that it is well mapped: * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings int... commented 2025-12-04 14:11:32 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175340979 (Comments: 2) | NKA (Discussed changesets: 144) | Nei, jeg har ikke annen informasjon enn fra NVDB. Den egentlige endringen her var et forlenget påkjøringsfelt ift. tidligere. commented 2025-12-04 14:09:29 UTC by NKA ♦253 |
| 174479502 (Comments: 1) | worldtest (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, das ist wahrscheinlich wieder deine Interpretation von Micromapping, aber die Nutzung von public_transport=platform ist relativ genau vorgegeben. So wie Du diese Bereiche anlegst, passt das nicht zu den Vorgaben des Tags. Bushaltestellen werden n... commented 2025-12-04 14:01:11 UTC by hybridOL ♦34 |
| 168409851 (Comments: 2) | Lkumar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi Spaghetti Monster🍝! My name is Sumit, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft and Lalit’s Teammate. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. I apologize for the mistake — you are absolutely correct that the ro... commented 2025-12-04 14:00:24 UTC by skumarchandela_lyft ♦14 |
| 175221596 (Comments: 1) | niklasfyi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Why did you add all these irrelevant tags to the bus stops? It's fairly obvious that ferries don't serve bus stops, as well as lightrails and other stuff we don't really have in Norway. This just adds noise to the map data... commented 2025-12-04 13:57:41 UTC by norgis ♦13 |
| 175493332 (Comments: 1) | rromitr (Discussed changesets: 4) | Buena. Ahí sí. Saludos --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175493332 commented 2025-12-04 13:57:25 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 170640452 (Comments: 2) | Javnik (Discussed changesets: 13) | Dzięki. Widziałem, ale przejdę się tam najpierw, żeby nie wyjść na złego wycofywacza :D commented 2025-12-04 13:56:28 UTC by Javnik ♦9 |
| 175458162 (Comments: 2) | Javnik (Discussed changesets: 13) | Np, bawię się lokalnie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance#subway-preprocessor. Wykryło też na tej wariantowej relacji, którą poprawiłeś. Nie poprawiałem tamtego, bo na szybko nie widziałem tego w rozkładzie, więc ... commented 2025-12-04 13:54:39 UTC by Javnik ♦9 |
| 175471877 (Comments: 2) | czebureks (Discussed changesets: 78) | Poprawione commented 2025-12-04 13:53:37 UTC by czebureks ♦138 |
| 155621836 (Comments: 1) | Martins_P (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/781616879/history has shop = workshop that was added in this edit shop=workshop ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.opens... commented 2025-12-04 13:49:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175228016 (Comments: 1) | AlphaStars (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. * Please accurately outline all buildings. Check the task instructions for the full requirements. Keep on mapping! commented 2025-12-04 13:44:58 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175494168 (Comments: 1) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 73) | Actually they aren't; there are no gate/signage at all indicating a slope maintenance path, the bottom of the staircase is directly connected to a random sidewalk. commented 2025-12-04 13:43:41 UTC by kingkingHK ♦35 |
| 175489831 (Comments: 1) | Yailp (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution! Please do try to upload changes for different countries seperately where possible to keep the bounding box smaller, to help reduce noise for reviewers. Some more info here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Chang... commented 2025-12-04 13:41:51 UTC by amosharper ♦35 |
| 175449372 (Comments: 1) | regulardoors (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! I removed the oneway tag because it is permitted to u-turn from atwater going south to atwater going north. There is no sign prohibiting it, so we must keep the segment two-way. Thanks and have a nice day! commented 2025-12-04 13:38:06 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦449 |
| 175458854 (Comments: 2) | u2IdbX51OyQ8NLmRN3niHFs5rGDy6x1ge1e2l69B8RnhdhNgy (Discussed changesets: 2) | my bad. edits were made in CoMaps App and doesn't allow control on how many of the changes upload at a time. I'll try to space them out more and see if it helps commented 2025-12-04 13:35:52 UTC by u2IdbX51OyQ8NLmRN3niHFs5rGDy6x1ge1e2l69B8RnhdhNgy ♦1 |
| 175433084 (Comments: 2) | Ozon OSM7 (Discussed changesets: 5) | спасибо за пояснение, буду внимательнее commented 2025-12-04 13:34:57 UTC by Ozon OSM7 ♦2 |
| 150815091 (Comments: 1) | marianamendesmm06 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11875228210/history has shop = workshop that was added in this edit shop=workshop ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.op... commented 2025-12-04 13:33:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175462205 (Comments: 2) | lustig78 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey, vielen Dank für die Ergänzungen. Eine Anmerkung: Die Gebäude sind im Vergleich zum ALKIS nicht rechtwinklig. Es wäre schön, wenn du das noch ändern könntest. Im iD Editor kann man das bspw. mit dem Tastenk&u... commented 2025-12-04 13:31:47 UTC by BjörnSc ♦4 |
| 175462136 (Comments: 2) | lustig78 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey, vielen Dank für die Ergänzungen. Eine Frage/Anmerkung: Die Gebäude sind im Vergleich zum ALKIS nicht rechtwinklig. Im iD Editor kann man das bspw. mit dem Tastenkürzel 'q' machen. VG --- ... commented 2025-12-04 13:31:09 UTC by BjörnSc ♦4 |
| 175493886 (Comments: 1) | MxW (Discussed changesets: 1) | As per* commented 2025-12-04 13:28:07 UTC by MxW ♦1 |
| 169478109 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste el uso de suelo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385617219 ? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=169478109 (en rojo esta resaltado lo que eliminaste, no debes eliminar el edificio que esta por dentro del ... commented 2025-12-04 13:25:26 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 169478667 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste las subdivisiones del edificio industrial? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=169478667 (en rojo esta resaltado lo que eliminaste) commented 2025-12-04 13:21:06 UTC by German C ♦88 |
 | 175391354 (Comments: 1) | tonny_mwendwa76 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A remark. Please map the round huts correctly as round buildings. Here, you mapped round buildings as rectangular ones. And, tiny spots without shadow are not subject to map. Best regards Best regard commented 2025-12-04 13:15:54 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 173671542 (Comments: 2) | janirek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Jasne ja som to robil iba na hodine v škole, keď sme skúšali tu robiť prvý krát, a nemal som presný prístup k ostatným informáciám. commented 2025-12-04 13:09:57 UTC by janirek ♦1 |
| 175305508 (Comments: 1) | voltairovicz (Discussed changesets: 268) | Ja bym opis "planowana droga ekspesowa S12" dał w description. Do Name nie pasuje. commented 2025-12-04 13:09:43 UTC by SpinOff ♦338 |
| 175464028 (Comments: 1) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 960) | Une erreur. Je corrige ce soir commented 2025-12-04 13:05:54 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦236 |
| 169744814 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por qué eliminaste el bosque que está junto al río? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=169744814 (en rojo esta resaltado el bosque que eliminaste) commented 2025-12-04 13:02:06 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175409583 (Comments: 1) | englu (Discussed changesets: 31) | Dzięki. Droga polna na południe od niej nie była narysowana i wyglądało to jak przesunięcie względem orto. commented 2025-12-04 13:00:57 UTC by SpinOff ♦338 |
| 175468650 (Comments: 2) | DinoDoesMapping (Discussed changesets: 1) | You're right. I'm new to mapping here so thought I'd just edit a small section at once but I can get on that as soon as I can :) commented 2025-12-04 12:59:33 UTC by DinoDoesMapping ♦1 |
| 117040699 (Comments: 2) | sanchi (Discussed changesets: 28) | was it supposed to be ele= ? commented 2025-12-04 12:59:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175491306 (Comments: 2) | 9292-DM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oneigenlijke tagging achter https://www.gemeentestein.nl/projecten/brug-urmond#:~:text=De%20renovatie%20van%20brug%20Urmond,blijven%20voor%20fietsers%20en%20voetgangers. verplaatst naar note= commented 2025-12-04 12:57:56 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175492024 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 173) | The node that was accidentally created was deleted in changeset 175492108 since it served no real purpose. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175492108 commented 2025-12-04 12:54:17 UTC by TinPetreković ♦188 |
| 175400021 (Comments: 2) | MayaDancer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ojej to chyba wypadek. Przepraszam. Dzięki za komentarz. commented 2025-12-04 12:54:08 UTC by MayaDancer ♦4 |
| 174355345 (Comments: 3) | Peter N Brooks (Discussed changesets: 1) | It looks like you used the iD editor, which shows the house name alongside the other address fields you added. Let me know if you have any more questions or if you would like me to change this for you. Thanks again for your helpful work... commented 2025-12-04 12:53:49 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 169837976 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, no debes eliminar edificios y volverlos a crear ya que se pierde el historial del edificio https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Keep_the_history lo que se debe hacer el mejorar la geometría modificando y no eliminando https://over... commented 2025-12-04 12:53:18 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175381776 (Comments: 5) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks for the clarification! : ) commented 2025-12-04 12:53:10 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 175445020 (Comments: 1) | 电弧星 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 发现地图线的标签丢失了。所以把这个编辑回退了。 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175491901#map=11/30.6188/103.9886 commented 2025-12-04 12:51:31 UTC by 这里没有鱼 ♦59 |
| 169843529 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los 52 edificios que estaban creados desde el 2018? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=169843529 (en rojo estan resaltados los edificios que eliminaste) commented 2025-12-04 12:42:56 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 115719044 (Comments: 3) | Muhmaker (Discussed changesets: 32) | My guess was correct. The shop no longer exists. The space is now used by the neighbouring shoe shop. I have updated the data. commented 2025-12-04 12:42:49 UTC by Muhmaker ♦131 |
| 170026553 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los 7 edificios que están junto al parqueadero? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170026553 (en rojo esta resaltado lo que eliminaste) commented 2025-12-04 12:37:45 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175310482 (Comments: 3) | conico52 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola agregaste (o modificaste) unos landuse=grass y los dejaste pegados a las veredas que pasan por ahí. TIenen que estar separados. En ID (que es el editor que usas) se pegan casi sin darse cuenta las cosas. Hay que estar atento... commented 2025-12-04 12:34:59 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 172008808 (Comments: 1) | archie (Discussed changesets: 290) | Archie, why do you keep removing the oneway tag here? Is it not correct? Please discuss this with your fellow editors instead of engaging in edit wars. commented 2025-12-04 12:34:20 UTC by wombatmaper ♦85 |
| 175377782 (Comments: 1) | JosV (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hallo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329844735/ is een pad (highway=path), géén fietspad (highway=cycleway). Fietspaden worden gesignaleerd middels verkeersborden D7, D9 of markeringen. Dit is hier niet het geval. Ik zal dit te... commented 2025-12-04 12:23:50 UTC by Thibault Rommel ♦86 |
| 175443090 (Comments: 1) | BlueAlpha8 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi! Thanks for your recent edit. I noticed the changes you made to roads in the airport area and wanted to understand your workflow a bit better. Could you please share how you digitized this road, such as what imagery or data sources you used, or do... commented 2025-12-04 12:16:30 UTC by ompatekar ♦6 |
| 175485559 (Comments: 1) | enoughpaudel (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wrong tagging!! You have mixed tags of highways with waterways. Please fix the tagging. commented 2025-12-04 12:15:13 UTC by Anil Basnet ♦58 |
| 175462463 (Comments: 1) | MatiasSpare (Discussed changesets: 3) | Again, your comment is false. You changed the type and access of roads only. commented 2025-12-04 12:14:48 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
 | 175438353 (Comments: 1) | LangtonMu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on your booth buildings. What is the mean of the tags access_roof = yes age = 35 building:neighbor = 100 building:prefab = no category = housing condition = good deviceid = fmtm.localhost:28c890... commented 2025-12-04 12:14:28 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175461442 (Comments: 1) | MatiasSpare (Discussed changesets: 3) | You didn't even divide any streets in this changeset. The only change you made was to the access of a road. So your summary comment is completely false! Please do not do that! commented 2025-12-04 12:14:00 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 160841042 (Comments: 4) | BarryMyles (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19916224 the new object for this area is still described as a forest of palm trees :) Regards, Marc commented 2025-12-04 12:09:50 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,326 |
| 175458122 (Comments: 1) | MatiasSpare (Discussed changesets: 3) | Your changeset message is false: you changed some roads from service roads to residential roads. commented 2025-12-04 12:08:45 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 175432447 (Comments: 1) | skiamakia (Discussed changesets: 3) | rv - not a valid name https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175489075 commented 2025-12-04 12:04:48 UTC by yelisey90 ♦211 |
| 175432539 (Comments: 1) | skiamakia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Generally such parkings are not free. Either they are reserved for local residents, which means access=permit, or they require 1 GEL per hour via an app our via a website. Please check the signs. commented 2025-12-04 12:04:06 UTC by yelisey90 ♦211 |
 | 173329364 (Comments: 3) | Sarca (Discussed changesets: 3) | See also: https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=03fcf6e8dc7548c8954a0c918c137214 commented 2025-12-04 12:03:21 UTC by Sarca ♦1 |
| 175462324 (Comments: 1) | skiamakia (Discussed changesets: 3) | The incline can't be "up" if the stairs descend into the underpass from two sides. They should be split in two. commented 2025-12-04 12:02:44 UTC by yelisey90 ♦211 |
| 171604017 (Comments: 1) | adas (Discussed changesets: 75) | Zobacz - jesteś pewien tych zakazów? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5066213 commented 2025-12-04 11:55:56 UTC by kubahahaha ♦415 |
| 141677851 (Comments: 1) | Freiwillige Feuerwehr Schlicht (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11215370575/history has shop = onlinehandel_mit_holzdeko that was added in this edit is it shop operating online without presence here? (in such case it should be deleted) Is it office of such compa... commented 2025-12-04 11:48:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175485288 (Comments: 2) | Riekardo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Er staat geen hek meer hier.. Bron OBLIEKfoto Slagboom&Peeters. Ik heb het hek verwijderd. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175485288 MVG eggie commented 2025-12-04 11:48:31 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175452090 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverting because the whole street should have been tagged with truck restrictions #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175487886 commented 2025-12-04 11:44:07 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175449318 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverting because the whole street should have been tagged with truck restrictions #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175487792 commented 2025-12-04 11:42:25 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175416469 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 905) | Thank you for correcting it. I’ve already updated the data in the MapRoulette task. commented 2025-12-04 11:41:53 UTC by Gustavo22Soares ♦68 |
| 175485096 (Comments: 2) | Riekardo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Situatie aangepast... Duplicated way verwijderd commented 2025-12-04 11:41:37 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175469494 (Comments: 1) | Carlos_Aranda (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Nuevamente fue eliminada la información sobre la familia que vive ahí. También fueron corregidos los tags usados (incluyendo la categoría) del camino interior. Por favor tomar nota de los comentarios. Estamos para... commented 2025-12-04 11:31:55 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175485209 (Comments: 1) | Riekardo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dag Riekardo.. Is hier nog wel een hek? MVG eggie commented 2025-12-04 11:28:52 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 140825047 (Comments: 1) | gogorm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168345054/ This has fixme=is there a passage here linking the roads either side? Do you mean "can you go from the residence to the business directly?" then there does seem to be ... commented 2025-12-04 11:27:30 UTC by VictorIE ♦973 |
 | 174771230 (Comments: 1) | SafwatHalaby (Discussed changesets: 83) | שלום, קראתי את הדיון אבל לא הבנתי למה היה צריך להסיר גם את admin_level=2. בשונה מגבולות הרשויות המקומיות אין יחס עם התגית הזו. אפשר אולי להוסי... commented 2025-12-04 11:26:55 UTC by hatul ♦424 |
| 175463454 (Comments: 1) | rromitr (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola. por favor cuadrar las casas, Eso se puede hacer con la letra Q. Además, si son casas iguales, puede simplemente copiar y pegar. Es algo sencillo. Lo vamos a corregir ahora, pero puede hacerlo usted sin problemas. saludos... commented 2025-12-04 11:24:03 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175478169 (Comments: 1) | enoughpaudel (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wrong tagging. Landuse= Agriculture is not valid. Also you are trying to create landuse that already exists. Please fix the errors you have created. commented 2025-12-04 11:20:43 UTC by Anil Basnet ♦58 |
| 175481665 (Comments: 3) | Yannick Lambin (Discussed changesets: 4) | Parfait merci, j'ai restauré l'accès pour la partie avant la barrière menant à la table de pic nic et ajouté l'acces privé pour la partie du jardin collectif. happy mapping. commented 2025-12-04 11:19:55 UTC by RaphaelPasloin ♦123 |
| 164593410 (Comments: 6) | Karl Gruber (Discussed changesets: 6) | vielen Dank, also auch keine "inneren" Gatter vermutlich mehr? commented 2025-12-04 11:17:41 UTC by kuhni74 ♦402 |
| 131509466 (Comments: 1) | Govinda Yadav (Discussed changesets: 3) | Overlapping forest created. Please fix !! commented 2025-12-04 11:17:16 UTC by Anil Basnet ♦58 |
| 175411855 (Comments: 1) | Emil1887 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Die Entsieglzng endet aber ei e Kreuzung davor commented 2025-12-04 11:15:20 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,447 |
| 167323216 (Comments: 4) | Paul Berry (Discussed changesets: 55) | Shop tag removed as advised. commented 2025-12-04 11:00:40 UTC by Paul Berry ♦135 |
| 175468675 (Comments: 1) | Create247 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ein weiteres Mal: Bitte keine Beschreibungen als Namen eintragen. Bitte auch keine völlig unsinnigen Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen eintragen, die so mit Sicherheit aus nicht ausgeschildert sind. commented 2025-12-04 10:57:39 UTC by Reclus ♦96 |
 | 158248245 (Comments: 15) | ODULANA OLUWATOYIN (Discussed changesets: 12) | If you mean the shop=water, it is used by the different groups. commented 2025-12-04 10:52:22 UTC by ODULANA OLUWATOYIN ♦6 |
| 165713542 (Comments: 2) | Tony501 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cette voie ferrée a été entièrement déposé au début des années 1990 sur toute sa longueur depuis elle est devenue une voie verte. commented 2025-12-04 10:50:59 UTC by Tony501 ♦1 |
| 127378946 (Comments: 1) | The_Cre8r (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077810948/history has roof:shape = pitched that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape=skillion was intended here? Or roof:shape=gabled? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roof:shape=pitched commented 2025-12-04 10:48:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 137467072 (Comments: 1) | Kovirii (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846884937/history has roof:shape = pitched that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape=skillion was intended here? Or roof:shape=gabled? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roof:shape=pitched commented 2025-12-04 10:48:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175242387 (Comments: 1) | Mapping Dutchman (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454450022/history has roof:shape = pitched that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape=skillion was intended here? Or roof:shape=gabled? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roof:shape=pitched commented 2025-12-04 10:48:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 136727213 (Comments: 1) | Gan_toon (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10939018448/history has man_made = pond that was added in this edit Is there some reason for using man_made=pond? Rather than normal natural=water water=pond commented 2025-12-04 10:34:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 166016825 (Comments: 1) | Gastein Tourismus (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ich hab die Sperre zunächst wieder aufgehoben, da der Weg heuer laut Strava-Heatmap regelmäßig begangen wurde. Für wen genau wurde abgesperrt, auch für Wanderer? Gibts vorort Verbotstafeln oder Absperrungen dafür? commented 2025-12-04 10:34:06 UTC by PPete2 ♦138 |
| 149723061 (Comments: 1) | kortgodt (Discussed changesets: 171) | Hej, Du har lavet vådområde på en stor del af et areal hvor der er skov/krat, og ikke særlig meget vådområde. Jeg undre mig lidt, da jeg har noget af jorden i området, og det er bestemt ikke et vå... commented 2025-12-04 10:33:48 UTC by STV87 ♦17 |
| 175481810 (Comments: 1) | number975312468 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, I told you before, OSRM update last for more than a week. gr eggie commented 2025-12-04 10:25:32 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 107459459 (Comments: 1) | Scott McKee (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4768838 if you are still in this area? commented 2025-12-04 10:23:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 155859801 (Comments: 1) | postown (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12141303764/history has shop = propangus that was added in this edit shop=propangus ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.... commented 2025-12-04 10:20:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 149174142 (Comments: 2) | Gastein Tourismus (Discussed changesets: 4) | ich hab den Weg wiederhersgestellt, da er großteils noch sichtbar und laut Strava-Heatmap begangen wird. @Gastein Tourismus: Bitte keine Pfade löschen, die noch zu sehen sind oder begangen werden. Sondern am besten einen Hinweis set... commented 2025-12-04 10:14:06 UTC by PPete2 ♦138 |
| 175435378 (Comments: 1) | Andrea Musuruane (Discussed changesets: 36) | l'area non è residenziale, è solo un "buco" nel bosco commented 2025-12-04 10:07:37 UTC by cartomatto ♦31 |
| 175195012 (Comments: 3) | Simon1595 (Discussed changesets: 5) | I have removed a number of non-constructive comments from user 3D打印 on this changeset. Please don't call each other names. I will also review Simon1595's recent edits with regard to damaging borders or deleting data in the border region... commented 2025-12-04 09:59:11 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,493 |
| 175178162 (Comments: 1) | eton-tech (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tôi thấy bạn thêm nhiều địa chỉ mà nó đã tồn tại rồi, ví dụ ở đây ct1 đã có trong tòa nhà fodacon. Tôi nghĩ bạn chỉ nên thêm đ... commented 2025-12-04 09:52:24 UTC by Hung Tran 9x0 ♦25 |
| 175478162 (Comments: 1) | airJH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175480970 commented 2025-12-04 09:47:46 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175478168 (Comments: 2) | best_tof (Discussed changesets: 1) | Feedback ..Gebouwen zijn import vanuit de BAG (kadaster). Soms verandert er iets. Je kunt dan herimport aanvragen via het forum van osm in het draadje BAG importverzoeken. Uitlijnen mbv een schuingenomen foto gaat lastig. Mvg.. eggie commented 2025-12-04 09:42:12 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 156621913 (Comments: 3) | birdupster (Discussed changesets: 1) | In fact, you are right! The error with the name I reported dates back to the first version of this object, so I apologise for having associated that edit with you. Kind regards commented 2025-12-04 09:36:32 UTC by DiogoBaptista98 ♦207 |
| 82264504 (Comments: 2) | lijai (Discussed changesets: 2) | Es existiert ein (auch Abwasser führender) unterirdischer Kanal, in dem das fragliche Wasser abfließt. Ich war drin und bin ihn über weite Strecken abgegangen und habe mich mit meiner Zeichnung an den zugehörigen Gullideckeln ori... commented 2025-12-04 09:27:51 UTC by lijai ♦1 |
| 175460176 (Comments: 1) | WarrenJWells (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, thank you for your effort to map cycling infrastructure. Unfortunately, (or more like fortunately, in this case) these protected bikeways/cycle tracks were already mapped. I would suggest taking a look at the "CyclOSM" layer under &quo... commented 2025-12-04 09:27:45 UTC by oba510 ♦271 |
| 175381365 (Comments: 1) | 44mpr (Discussed changesets: 2) | regarding the replacing of "St." with "Saint" in place names, please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/st-stephen-new-brunswick-or-saint-stephen/130485 and participate in that discussion before you repeat this kind of edit... commented 2025-12-04 08:56:55 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,493 |
| 175474588 (Comments: 1) | meongseolin (Discussed changesets: 40) | 本變更集主要為大幅更新徐州地鐵路網， 也有其他的物件變動 commented 2025-12-04 08:35:43 UTC by h4ic8bn3kstr ♦6 |
| 175478187 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 404) | No, closing https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5077499 commented 2025-12-04 08:30:21 UTC by habi ♦1,976 |
| 175476233 (Comments: 1) | 이대흠 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175477858 commented 2025-12-04 08:21:35 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175084516 (Comments: 1) | Webpapst (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, ich habe die Änderungen hier revertiert. Das Hotel gibt es bereits links nebenan in node 2472486718 commented 2025-12-04 08:12:11 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,987 |
| 175392704 (Comments: 1) | Webpapst (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, hier kommt auch "camera:direction" mit dem Wert 2760 zum Einsatz. Das ist keine valide Kompassgradzahl. commented 2025-12-04 08:10:25 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,987 |
| 175473213 (Comments: 1) | Webpapst (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, bei "camera:direction" wird eine Kompassgradzahl erwartet. 2010 scheint eher das "start_date" sein oder? commented 2025-12-04 08:09:38 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,987 |
| 175473768 (Comments: 1) | Webpapst (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, bitte bei Telefonnummern immer die Landesvorwahl ergänzen, in dem Fall "+49 176 ...". Danke dir! :) commented 2025-12-04 08:08:37 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,987 |
 | 167468881 (Comments: 1) | albertoq (Discussed changesets: 57) | Hola alberto, puedes mirar qué pasó aquí al convertir un restaurante en una iglesia que ya existía? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12045541550/history#map=19/41.403953/2.185783 commented 2025-12-04 08:06:23 UTC by pantufla ♦289 |
| 175473403 (Comments: 1) | Webpapst (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo, ich habe dieses Changeset teilweise revertiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175477411 Du hast das Bahnsignal um fast einen Kilometer ins Wohngebiet verschoben. commented 2025-12-04 08:06:15 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,987 |
| 175361796 (Comments: 1) | Luisead (Discussed changesets: 1) | Duplikat vereinigt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175477303 commented 2025-12-04 08:02:19 UTC by whb ♦636 |
| 175360245 (Comments: 1) | Lena1905 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Teilrevert wegen Verschiebungen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175477186 commented 2025-12-04 07:59:31 UTC by whb ♦636 |
| 175440667 (Comments: 1) | BlueAlpha8 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I've just removed about 30 sections of duplicated service highways. Please do not double back over a highway when you map it. It doesn't matter how many sections it is made up of, but do not over sections. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-04 07:59:01 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,011 |
| 153777508 (Comments: 2) | yopaseopor (Discussed changesets: 148) | Hola @yopaseopor, podemos borrar esta dirección? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12045541550/history#map=19/41.403953/2.185783 commented 2025-12-04 07:57:00 UTC by pantufla ♦289 |
| 175360505 (Comments: 1) | Haferflocke15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Teilrevert wegen Verschiebungen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175476982 commented 2025-12-04 07:55:31 UTC by whb ♦636 |
| 175448645 (Comments: 2) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 109) | I did it to ensure that Nominatim returns a result when querying ‘Sidi Ali’. The name tag is overloaded with multiple variants in different alphabets and in both left-to-right and right-to-left scripts, which prevented consistent matching... commented 2025-12-04 07:53:58 UTC by Reino Baptista ♦107 |
| 175451954 (Comments: 3) | Elischer (Discussed changesets: 5) | Wenn Du für eine Firma arbeitest, erwartet die Community Transparenz im Rahmen von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Organised_Editing_Guidelines Zur Vermeidung von Datenbank-Konflikten habe ich Deinen unsachgemäßen Import... commented 2025-12-04 07:50:38 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,379 |
| 174705155 (Comments: 1) | w_djatmiko (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello, thank you for the fixes. As a guest I tried to fix the whole Kuta region and just notices there's now an accidental duplicate in Kuta, please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13307172038#map=15/-8.88696/116.28397 commented 2025-12-04 07:34:33 UTC by pantufla ♦289 |
| 169779431 (Comments: 1) | Lord_Vlad (Discussed changesets: 1) | bonjour, il ne s'agit pas d'une hightway=cycleway mais bien cycleway:(buffer):right=lane (piste cyclable marquée (non séparée) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane commented 2025-12-04 07:25:03 UTC by fredlenoir ♦18 |
| 175474218 (Comments: 1) | abcabcabcabcabc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175476085 commented 2025-12-04 07:25:01 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175473374 (Comments: 1) | 이대흠 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175476056 commented 2025-12-04 07:24:12 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 164057264 (Comments: 2) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 11) | I corrected the direction of the Gateway Lane Northeast one-way roads in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175475244 by clicking on the "Change Direction" button in the "One Way" field of the ways in iD editor. commented 2025-12-04 07:05:47 UTC by Frank Peng ♦46 |
| 175417177 (Comments: 1) | Dropman (Discussed changesets: 1) | C.Ayral Diye Bir Bulvar ismi yok. commented 2025-12-04 07:02:39 UTC by kgm123 ♦1 |
| 70402050 (Comments: 1) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 124) | Hey, I'm curious why you expanded the name. Isn't the signed name just "Molly Moon's" or perhaps "Molly Moon's Ice Cream" and that other information, especially the Columbia City location name, best included in... commented 2025-12-04 06:56:56 UTC by pwbriggs ♦100 |
| 175436400 (Comments: 2) | NasuFoito (Discussed changesets: 5) | Спасибо! commented 2025-12-04 06:56:16 UTC by NasuFoito ♦4 |
| 99133352 (Comments: 5) | HaPe-CZ (Discussed changesets: 91) | Pokud by to chtěl někdo opravdu řešit, tak relace budou přiřazeny části nástupiště, koleje a místa zastavení, kde bude čelo vlaku. commented 2025-12-04 06:49:11 UTC by HaPe-CZ ♦92 |
| 175356024 (Comments: 2) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175455246 commented 2025-12-04 06:45:43 UTC by JakovBušić ♦17 |
| 164517917 (Comments: 2) | Pedro J López E (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola, por favor podrías corredir Adícora? commented 2025-12-04 06:38:46 UTC by pantufla ♦289 |
| 174947139 (Comments: 2) | Osaka78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks tastrax, I was wondering about that. Kind regards commented 2025-12-04 06:26:55 UTC by Osaka78 ♦1 |
| 175465925 (Comments: 1) | number975312468 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, We call that duplicated ways.. I removed the duplicated way. Gr eggie commented 2025-12-04 06:08:08 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175465748 (Comments: 1) | number975312468 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, No need adding foot=yes to a cycleway in the Netherlands. That's default. Greetz, eggie commented 2025-12-04 05:59:37 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175473186 (Comments: 1) | zylu (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-04 05:40:56 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175127739 (Comments: 6) | wielandb (Discussed changesets: 31) | That first link should have been https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking#Physical_properties commented 2025-12-04 05:37:30 UTC by TheSwavu ♦572 |
| 174581371 (Comments: 3) | Aishitha (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. In such cases, please add "local knowledge" as one of the sources in future. commented 2025-12-04 05:13:36 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦600 |
| 175469719 (Comments: 1) | 쿄zyzy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175472475 commented 2025-12-04 05:00:23 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175468221 (Comments: 1) | 조나단박 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175472450 commented 2025-12-04 04:59:18 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 173674869 (Comments: 2) | NegroRiver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello ilias_, GuainiaRiver is no longer on the team, so I will be handling this on their behalf. Thank you for clarifying the legal restrictions regarding residential pedestrian crossings, your local knowledge and input is greatly appreciated! I ... commented 2025-12-04 04:55:41 UTC by ApaRiver ♦4 |
| 175343961 (Comments: 2) | Swihail (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hi dmjab13, Thank you for the message. Happy mapping! commented 2025-12-04 04:51:13 UTC by Swihail ♦34 |
| 175119565 (Comments: 1) | Anatol19 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Creo que está confundiendo landuse=commercial (área de oficinas) con landuse=retail (área de comercios) Ver: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:landuse=commercial?uselang=es y https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag... commented 2025-12-04 03:43:47 UTC by AgusQui ♦615 |
| 175125871 (Comments: 1) | Anatol19 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Por favor puede ser más preciso con el dibujo de las áreas, le recomiendo usar imágenes aéreas de CABA que tienen más calidad para este tipo de mapeo. commented 2025-12-04 03:40:37 UTC by AgusQui ♦615 |
| 175447242 (Comments: 2) | marazzer (Discussed changesets: 42) | Polemizowałbym z tym, że ten odcinek nie ma znaczenia dla krajowego i międzynarodowego tranzytu. Jedynie nie było konsensusu co do trunka na Marynarki Polskiej. commented 2025-12-04 03:36:26 UTC by theDM ♦157 |
| 175130392 (Comments: 1) | Anatol19 (Discussed changesets: 3) | No se mapean este tipo de cosas. En OSM se agregan elementos actuales, no posibles, pasados o futuros. commented 2025-12-04 03:31:37 UTC by AgusQui ♦615 |
| 175447958 (Comments: 1) | jalfiewalfie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello jalfiewalfie welcome to OSM. After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so ... commented 2025-12-04 03:24:53 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175427838 (Comments: 1) | ESVL (Discussed changesets: 6) | 你可不可以不要那麼缺德 commented 2025-12-04 03:21:35 UTC by Bustycat ♦8 |
| 175466788 (Comments: 1) | Not George (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is the camera located on the telephone pole on the northwest corner of the intersection? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175466788 commented 2025-12-04 03:14:32 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
 | 171901456 (Comments: 3) | Gregory Peony (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello $username commented 2025-12-04 03:10:15 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175468484 (Comments: 4) | Alejandra_Sterling (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset also split ways that are administrative boundaries and sidewalks, what is even the point of doing that? commented 2025-12-04 03:05:19 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 175300277 (Comments: 2) | czebureks (Discussed changesets: 78) | Przez Kielecką wciąż wiedzie, jak wcześniej, główna relacja Centrum -> Chwarzno. Małokacka została podniesiona ze względu na relację Chwarzno -> Centrum. Dla konsekwencji możnaby obniżyć do "tertiary" dwujezd... commented 2025-12-04 02:58:56 UTC by czebureks ♦138 |
| 174970037 (Comments: 10) | czebureks (Discussed changesets: 78) | Z komunikatów prasowych wynikało, że również pieszych obowiązuje tylko jeden kierunek w stronę Witomina. To byłaby chyba dość wyjątkowa sytuacja w skali kraju. Trzeba będzie się wybrać w końcu zobaczyć jak to wygląda w te... commented 2025-12-04 02:54:16 UTC by czebureks ♦138 |
| 175407534 (Comments: 1) | apgosm (Discussed changesets: 8) | These changes don't appear to reflect reality, with one road in particular extending into the shopping centre itself. Should these changes be reverted? commented 2025-12-04 02:49:25 UTC by gromzx ♦2 |
| 175460809 (Comments: 2) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 59) | Wystarczy doczytać o nazwach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity=fire%20station?uselang=pl commented 2025-12-04 02:23:36 UTC by grzegorz75jan ♦574 |
| 174492132 (Comments: 2) | 漣澪靈 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 好，我打算最近，補全一些沒有繁體中文的節點 commented 2025-12-04 02:09:08 UTC by 漣澪靈 ♦2 |
| 164247878 (Comments: 1) | zlyntud (Discussed changesets: 12) | untuk "1,316 km (818 mi)" hanya boleh gunakan 1. Bisa gunakan "1316" saja, nilai default dalam km; atau "1316 km" serta "818 mi." Ribuan tidak perlu koma sebagai penanda. Penggunaan koma sebagai nilai desimal m... commented 2025-12-04 01:51:04 UTC by FajrAl ♦117 |
| 175468939 (Comments: 1) | Maps Man (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hi, just to follow up on some of my previous comments, thank you for considering the scope of features you uploaded in this changeset and submitting a comment relevant to the features you mapped. --- Publ... commented 2025-12-04 01:47:37 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 154845087 (Comments: 1) | zlyntud (Discussed changesets: 12) | Banyak multipolygon lahan harusnya menggunakan role "outer." Penggunaan "inner" dilakukan bila lahannya memiliki lahan kosong di tengah seperti donat. Sudah diperbaiki. bisa dicek di sini: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi... commented 2025-12-04 01:46:29 UTC by FajrAl ♦117 |
 | 175469197 (Comments: 2) | 44mpr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please join this discussion to explain your changes https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/names-in-algeria/127362 commented 2025-12-04 01:44:39 UTC by ilias_ ♦376 |
| 164247563 (Comments: 1) | zlyntud (Discussed changesets: 12) | untuk "distance=25 km (16 mi)" hanya boleh gunakan 1. Bisa gunakan "25" saja, nilai default dalam km; atau "25 km" serta "16 mi." commented 2025-12-04 01:44:16 UTC by FajrAl ♦117 |
| 175451719 (Comments: 2) | SD Mapman (Discussed changesets: 31) | Thanks! Missing the plain dirt areas out by Mirror (no good tag) and I still haven't got around to doing the landuse out by Cox. commented 2025-12-04 01:36:37 UTC by SD Mapman ♦48 |
| 175410009 (Comments: 3) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 97) | Reverting those changesets was done to restore names incorrectly stripped from cycleways and sidewalks. commented 2025-12-04 01:18:52 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 147554944 (Comments: 11) | RussNelson (Discussed changesets: 33) | True, but that is beside the point. commented 2025-12-04 01:16:01 UTC by RussNelson ♦51 |
| 175425275 (Comments: 1) | DaveTheHorse123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names like Garage, 516... Instead just use the appropriate tags --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175425275 commented 2025-12-04 01:03:14 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175463541 (Comments: 1) | MapowiczniAK (Discussed changesets: 8) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-04 00:56:53 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175454389 (Comments: 1) | Xaruss18 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159693797 Pozdrawiam!... commented 2025-12-04 00:56:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175460007 (Comments: 1) | rafalw8 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-12-04 00:56:49 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175457000 (Comments: 1) | Fan map 2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607316695 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-12-04 00:56:39 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175464956 (Comments: 2) | Mariusz Dykierek (Discussed changesets: 44) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13352145069 https://www.openstreetmap.or... commented 2025-12-04 00:56:34 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175463197 (Comments: 1) | AgustinMastricola (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola Agustín, gracias por colaborar. He observado tus ediciones y noté que agregaste el nombre de la sucursal dentro de la etiqueta "name". Esto es incorrecto ya que existe una etiqueta dedicada para este fin, la c... commented 2025-12-04 00:55:39 UTC by mweper ♦437 |
| 175463041 (Comments: 1) | AgustinMastricola (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola Agustín, gracias por colaborar. He observado tus ediciones y noté que agregaste el nombre de la sucursal dentro de la etiqueta "name". Esto es incorrecto ya que existe una etiqueta dedicada para este fin, la c... commented 2025-12-04 00:55:26 UTC by mweper ♦437 |
| 175462755 (Comments: 1) | AgustinMastricola (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola Agustín, gracias por colaborar. He observado tus ediciones y noté que agregaste el nombre de la sucursal dentro de la etiqueta "name". Esto es incorrecto ya que existe una etiqueta dedicada para este fin, la c... commented 2025-12-04 00:54:30 UTC by mweper ♦437 |
| 175391036 (Comments: 1) | William Oldfield (Discussed changesets: 2) | This was correctly tagged, as the track is clearly visible in aerial imagery and is on OS OpenMap Local. Adding access=private was correct (thanks), deleting the other tags, presumably in order to stop it rendering, is not. Reverted in https:/... commented 2025-12-04 00:39:33 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 175465201 (Comments: 1) | muzics547 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Your comment should not be “PUNK!”, but instead should describe what you did. commented 2025-12-04 00:38:41 UTC by Coel312 ♦1 |
| 175184101 (Comments: 2) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 8) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-12-04 00:37:47 UTC by RahilPasha ♦7 |
| 175463452 (Comments: 1) | William Oldfield (Discussed changesets: 2) | Changing access=private to access=no changes the meaning from "access only with explicit permission" to "no access for any transport mode", which is unlikely to be correct. You can read the documentation for the access key ... commented 2025-12-04 00:34:22 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
 | 175421036 (Comments: 1) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 24) | thanks for fixing it! commented 2025-12-04 00:30:32 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 174791543 (Comments: 2) | Tigran Asaturjan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Sveiks! Paldies, tūlīt pielabošu! commented 2025-12-04 00:25:14 UTC by Tigran Asaturjan ♦1 |
| 175440178 (Comments: 4) | catgirlseraid (Discussed changesets: 32) | thanks for finding the surface=3 error! <3 commented 2025-12-04 00:22:54 UTC by catgirlseraid ♦42 |
| 175432421 (Comments: 1) | Weronika Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-04 00:22:13 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175433908 (Comments: 1) | subol (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-04 00:22:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175434778 (Comments: 1) | Weronika Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-04 00:22:08 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175434016 (Comments: 1) | subol (Discussed changesets: 3) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-04 00:22:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175436580 (Comments: 1) | nighthawk76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-04 00:22:02 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175434713 (Comments: 1) | Weronika Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 5) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkc... commented 2025-12-04 00:21:58 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175005621 (Comments: 1) | Anrijs Terauds (Discussed changesets: 83) | Sveiki, Zīmējot elementus kā laukumus, lūdzu apvieno (redaktorā C) tos ar iepriekš iezīmētiem punktiem, ja tādi ir. Citādi datos ir nepareizi dubultēti elementi vienam objektam. Šajā gadījumā zīmējot parking... commented 2025-12-04 00:13:27 UTC by HellMap ♦767 |
| 175466221 (Comments: 3) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 25) | I've now updated the casing in Bexhill and the database for any other updates. commented 2025-12-04 00:08:33 UTC by philipcullen ♦15 |
| 175426507 (Comments: 1) | Walleyflock (Discussed changesets: 2) | This might be an accidental remap of the camera on 300 West? There doesn't seem to be a camera here. commented 2025-12-04 00:02:15 UTC by HashFerret ♦10 |
| 172334938 (Comments: 1) | Mister_R2 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Čau, Zīmējot elementus kā laukumus, lūdzu apvieno (redaktorā C) tos ar iepriekš iezīmētiem punktiem, ja tādi ir. Citādi datos ir nepareizi dubultēti elementi vienam objektam. Šajā gadījumā zīmējot parkingu ... commented 2025-12-04 00:01:12 UTC by HellMap ♦767 |
| 175456527 (Comments: 4) | lann (Discussed changesets: 10) | panoramax=ec3b1177-c00f-47cf-8833-0ca389badc14 sauf erreur commented 2025-12-03 23:31:42 UTC by trial ♦991 |
| 145183216 (Comments: 1) | WT_2023_reg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231655166/history has surface = kies that was added in this edit is it surface=gravel ? surface=fine_gravel ? surface=pebblestone ? Something else? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface and h... commented 2025-12-03 23:17:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 122375009 (Comments: 1) | BerggamsO1d4 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1069609063/history has surface = kies that was added in this edit is it surface=gravel ? surface=fine_gravel ? surface=pebblestone ? Something else? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface and h... commented 2025-12-03 23:17:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 147343657 (Comments: 1) | HM7_501872 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11611625158/history has surface = kies that was added in this edit is it surface=gravel ? surface=fine_gravel ? surface=pebblestone ? Something else? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface and... commented 2025-12-03 23:17:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 148626119 (Comments: 1) | Ammannm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11729930341/history has surface = kies that was added in this edit is it surface=gravel ? surface=fine_gravel ? surface=pebblestone ? Something else? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface and... commented 2025-12-03 23:17:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175420545 (Comments: 2) | DuckMan2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome DuckMan2! Just another minor thing: you missed the + at the start of the phone number for Little Ceasars. You did it correctly for 13th Floor Cannabis, so it was obviously just a minor oversight. Thanks for the great contribution, and k... commented 2025-12-03 23:05:15 UTC by Adam Dunn ♦22 |
| 175224739 (Comments: 3) | Nar_ach (Discussed changesets: 12) | hi Nar_arch, yes, the highway=service and the amenity=parking should be connected. The were previously sharing the same node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11756706495/ which you deleted. If you do not want to revert your changeset th... commented 2025-12-03 22:58:59 UTC by redd ♦450 |
| 175464487 (Comments: 1) | lann (Discussed changesets: 10) | salut, le wikidata est pour l'objet, j'avais dit subject:wikidata car c'est le sujet représenté par le buste. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:subject:wikidata commented 2025-12-03 22:29:56 UTC by trial ♦991 |
| 175463765 (Comments: 1) | Mejores Casinos Espana (Discussed changesets: 1) | Esta edición ha sido revertida por su contenido publicitario. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam commented 2025-12-03 22:27:31 UTC by MarinoBM ♦114 |
| 175417208 (Comments: 6) | number975312468 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Check sat or sunday.. maybe later commented 2025-12-03 22:16:55 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 173988040 (Comments: 2) | VLD322 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello Benoît, Thank you for reaching out and making the appropriate corrections. I thought I had avoided the area under construction, but apparently not. I apologize for any inconvenience. Best wishes, Logan commented 2025-12-03 22:15:28 UTC by VLD322 ♦4 |
| 175169725 (Comments: 9) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 109) | Chodziło mi o 13:00. Zapomniałem o tym, ale już napisałem post w wątku commented 2025-12-03 22:14:21 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦822 |
| 170028399 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, no debes eliminar los nodos que tiene información de horarios de apertura y/o teléfonos de contacto del restaurante https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8952495506 ese dato es útil para los visitantes el restaurante se l... commented 2025-12-03 22:13:42 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175465769 (Comments: 1) | Minh Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 169) | Also fixed some gaps in boundary relations along the river. commented 2025-12-03 22:12:37 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦591 |
| 175411077 (Comments: 2) | mdeveney (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Yushclay, Yes, I'm with the Pala GIS Department and I'm trying to update the reservation boundary using JOSM, which I'm clearly still new to. I will get the boundary relations sorted out asap. commented 2025-12-03 22:09:01 UTC by mdeveney ♦1 |
| 166179048 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 65) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444208347 is a segment of a river, not a flowline that only exists for theoretical purposes in OSM. For example, Mobridge is on Lake Oahe but it’s also on the Missouri River. commented 2025-12-03 22:08:58 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦591 |
| 175446216 (Comments: 4) | number975312468 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Updates will take several days.. it depends from the routingapp you use commented 2025-12-03 22:06:56 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 174836636 (Comments: 2) | VLD299 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello KelsonV, I apologize for any inconvenience, and I’ll make sure to use the more current bing imagery for this area going forwards. Thank you for your help! -VLD299 / Conor commented 2025-12-03 22:04:34 UTC by VLD299 ♦6 |
| 170028666 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste el kiosko de comidas que esta en el mirador 360 del parque? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170028666 el kiosko se observa también aquí https://parquesdesantander.com/visor/index.html -deb... commented 2025-12-03 22:00:47 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 174793353 (Comments: 2) | Rwags (Discussed changesets: 2) | It's right inside the fence looking down the road. Road T's there. commented 2025-12-03 21:58:42 UTC by Rwags ♦1 |
| X | 169531102 (Comments: 5) | maurobe57 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sorry, I meant https://en.osm.town/@pietervdvn/112928272482062515 . commented 2025-12-03 21:56:30 UTC by ika-chan! ♦311 |
| 175464433 (Comments: 5) | number975312468 (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=52.294944%2C4.850444%3B52.302475%2C4.859994#map=15/52.29877/4.85518&layers=N Check end of the week commented 2025-12-03 21:52:16 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 170078003 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los 4 edificios que estaban cerca a la rotonda del anillo vial? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170078003 (en rojo están resaltadas las eliminaciones que hiciste) commented 2025-12-03 21:48:08 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175008631 (Comments: 4) | RafaBoski (Discussed changesets: 43) | Miałeś rację :P commented 2025-12-03 21:47:02 UTC by RafaBoski ♦17 |
| 170179628 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que borraste los edificios, piscinas que habían creado otros usuarios? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170179628 (en rojo aparecen los edificios que eliminaste) commented 2025-12-03 21:36:16 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175464778 (Comments: 1) | Ltrlg (Discussed changesets: 51) | source += Cadastre (pour les garages) commented 2025-12-03 21:35:41 UTC by Ltrlg ♦95 |
| 175430616 (Comments: 2) | maddog107 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry about that. I did not see your edit commented 2025-12-03 21:33:58 UTC by maddog107 ♦2 |
| 170362524 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los edificios que se habían creado en el año 2020 y los bosques? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170362524 (lo rojo fue lo que eliminaste) commented 2025-12-03 21:25:49 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175463770 (Comments: 1) | Sporteenbeetje (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback name=Kablebaan heb ik aangepast naar playground=zipwire Niet name=...gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. MV... commented 2025-12-03 21:25:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 170362812 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste el parque ecológico del barrio parnaso? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170362812 ese parque si existe https://www.facebook.com/42gradosfreestyle/videos/como-llegar-al-parque-ecol%C3%B3gico-del-b... commented 2025-12-03 21:21:41 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175463917 (Comments: 2) | BBJIB (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi! Da bin ich dir total einig. Feel free das in diesen Fällen noch anzupassen, ich bin inzwischen wieder weiter weg weil es mir zu kalt war :) commented 2025-12-03 21:21:20 UTC by BBJIB ♦14 |
| 175461271 (Comments: 1) | Wyatt Sibilia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists o... commented 2025-12-03 21:14:54 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 175463304 (Comments: 1) | Sam Omiotek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your object, please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:aeroway. commented 2025-12-03 21:10:03 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 13994242 (Comments: 7) | RussNelson (Discussed changesets: 33) | Many people disagree with that claim. commented 2025-12-03 21:08:48 UTC by RussNelson ♦51 |
| 175452897 (Comments: 3) | number975312468 (Discussed changesets: 8) | thanks, correct now yes commented 2025-12-03 21:07:49 UTC by number975312468 ♦4 |
| 175414472 (Comments: 2) | aighes (Discussed changesets: 28) | Siehe: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sind-hinweise-mit-driveways-wurden-noch-nicht-eingetragen-verboten/138372/53 commented 2025-12-03 21:06:11 UTC by aighes ♦21 |
| 175054424 (Comments: 6) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo Metzor, Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht und Sorry, das ich zu viele Kommentare hintergelassen habe!! Danke, das du diese Fehler Rückganig gemacht hast!! Ich werde die anderen Tagen noch meine nicht beantworteten &... commented 2025-12-03 21:05:09 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 175433609 (Comments: 1) | Supastu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Ich habe zwei Hinweise: Geometrie: Einige Objekte sind nicht rechtwinklig. Für den Fall, dass sie es in der Realit&au... commented 2025-12-03 21:01:13 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
| 172091978 (Comments: 2) | symac (Discussed changesets: 10) | Merci @zorglubu, je ne connaissais pas cette consigne, je tacherai de l'appliquer désormais. commented 2025-12-03 20:58:40 UTC by symac ♦11 |
| 170411304 (Comments: 2) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, el nombre es Parque Ecológico La Flora, tal y como se ve en el sistema de parques metropolitanos https://www.amb.gov.co/noticias-4/ y no tiene ese dato adicional de "zona de exploración" commented 2025-12-03 20:58:32 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175354734 (Comments: 1) | eyw27 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Esa pasarela non vai estar ata o 2030, eu poríaa como proposed https://www.laopinioncoruna.es/coruna/2025/11/14/apertura-pasarela-acceso-coches-intermodal-123734118.html commented 2025-12-03 20:57:01 UTC by Gabriel44200 ♦5 |
| 174568846 (Comments: 2) | RussNelson (Discussed changesets: 33) | Tracks in the pavement 200' to the south, the shape of the building, and the obvious railbed going north eventually joining to active tracks. commented 2025-12-03 20:56:04 UTC by RussNelson ♦51 |
| 173098886 (Comments: 1) | jonwil28 (Discussed changesets: 2) | If the car park is open, why not tag this as amenity=parking? commented 2025-12-03 20:52:08 UTC by phodgkin ♦73 |
| 170501566 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste las áreas comunes ubicados en los centro de los bloques de edificios? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170501566 commented 2025-12-03 20:49:59 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 134557696 (Comments: 4) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 204) | Given rails poking through the pavement 300' to the north and 100' to the south, you'd think it would be obvious that this is an abandoned railway. It was obvious to me when I was there. Do I need to post photos? commented 2025-12-03 20:47:44 UTC by RussNelson ♦51 |
| 174918742 (Comments: 2) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo mcliquid, Oh sorry, das wusste ich leider nicht!! könntest mir dabei hefen, diesen Fehler bitte wieder rückgängig zu machen?? Vielen Dank in voraus, das du auch diese Änderung Rückgängig machs... commented 2025-12-03 20:47:42 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 174282055 (Comments: 1) | CDLO (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, Sauf erreur de ma part, suite à la mise à jour des pistes cyclables, il semble qu'il ait une légère interférence avec la ligne de bus Relation : Bus 147 : Église de Pantin → Avenue Ron... commented 2025-12-03 20:41:35 UTC by michel60 ♦90 |
| 170692511 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste el edificio multipoligono que exactamente igual al de la vista satelital y creaste un edificio rectangular en ese sitio el cual no se ajusta a la geometría, y por qué eliminaste el área de ve... commented 2025-12-03 20:38:40 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 174918739 (Comments: 4) | Fabian007 (Discussed changesets: 69) | Hallo Mcliquid, Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht!! Ich habe diese App vor paar Tagen von meinen Handy deinstalliert und werde es nicht mehr erneut herunterladen. Aber danke, das du meine Änderungen mit der App rückg... commented 2025-12-03 20:37:35 UTC by Fabian007 ♦67 |
| 175461061 (Comments: 2) | erik1984 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dit is een andere changeset :) Staat los van de changeset die ik in de note heb aangehaald. commented 2025-12-03 20:35:44 UTC by erik1984 ♦1 |
| 170693895 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los dos bosques que se observan en la imagen satelital? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170693895 commented 2025-12-03 20:29:02 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 170747888 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por qué eliminaste las dos piscinas https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/719543927 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/719543928 que aparecen en la imagen satelital? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170747888 (en rojo ... commented 2025-12-03 20:20:20 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 125786644 (Comments: 3) | MaLivou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice catch ! Yup it was an autocompletion error for the ele tag. I just fixed it. commented 2025-12-03 20:17:05 UTC by MaLivou ♦1 |
| 175432279 (Comments: 1) | f_gonella (Discussed changesets: 49) | Ciao f_gonella, perché stai mettendo tutti questi noexit=yes? Se l'ultimo nodo di una strada non è connesso a un'altra è ovvio che la strada non abbia uscita, non c'è bisogno di questo tag, che è s... commented 2025-12-03 20:10:25 UTC by totera ♦311 |
| 130561280 (Comments: 2) | Math1985 (Discussed changesets: 36) | Hi Mateusz, hope you're doing well! You're right, I fixed the tag. commented 2025-12-03 20:09:25 UTC by Math1985 ♦116 |
| 175459371 (Comments: 1) | marco bogi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Benvenuto su OSM Marco! La tua modifica non mi sembra abbia problemi. All'inizio ti consiglio di aggiungere/modificare nodi separati come panchine, indirizzi, ristoranti, etc. però sentiti libero di agire come meglio credi.<... commented 2025-12-03 20:08:26 UTC by MarcoR ♦534 |
| 175438586 (Comments: 4) | RandomThighsEnjoyer (Discussed changesets: 6) | Kann man lese ich, aber man sollte sich mit dem Autoren des Changesets absprechen. Mein OK dafür hast du, falls nichts dagegen spricht. commented 2025-12-03 20:07:44 UTC by RandomThighsEnjoyer ♦5 |
| 175045456 (Comments: 1) | Eric82 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dzięki za edycję! commented 2025-12-03 20:05:27 UTC by kamilbogacki ♦28 |
| 175378501 (Comments: 2) | urimsch (Discussed changesets: 1) | @mcliquid, thanks a lot for your comment, will pay attention to this issue the next time. commented 2025-12-03 19:58:03 UTC by urimsch ♦2 |
| 166354417 (Comments: 3) | os-emmer (Discussed changesets: 49) | Thanks for replying. I know you didn't create the object, but at least you changed the tagging. The problem is that there is absolutely no consensus on OSM on how to tag those area=* situations. commented 2025-12-03 19:54:35 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,828 |
| 175447681 (Comments: 3) | neo-plan (Discussed changesets: 178) | обычно пишут вот так: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/55.608001/37.656286&layers=N здесь просто название линии неверное. Она называется Арбатско-Покровска... commented 2025-12-03 19:54:34 UTC by literan ♦6,895 |
| 175460003 (Comments: 1) | chirping broom (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, nice to see you mapping again. The suqare buildings look valid to me, though they are slightly oversized. Consider that you are looking at roofs but mapping footprints. Mapping slightly smaller than the roof tends to be more accurate. <... commented 2025-12-03 19:50:45 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦1,114 |
| 175438880 (Comments: 1) | Михаил Колодий (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CLgEZ-3B дублер не открыт, стоят блоки. зачем вносите неверные данные? commented 2025-12-03 19:47:55 UTC by literan ♦6,895 |
 | 142442976 (Comments: 1) | Alvarado2510 (Discussed changesets: 314) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665898857/history has cycleway = yes that was added in this edit what kind of cycleway? there is a big difference between cycleway=track and cycleway=separate and cycleway=shared_lane commented 2025-12-03 19:47:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 149497443 (Comments: 1) | djo_man (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11781224862/history has cycleway = yes that was added in this edit what kind of cycleway? there is a big difference between cycleway=track and cycleway=separate and cycleway=shared_lane commented 2025-12-03 19:47:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175461464 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 564) | shop=vacant was clearly leftover from older versions commented 2025-12-03 19:43:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175461088 (Comments: 1) | Lou-Yasmine (Discussed changesets: 1) | bug incessant. J'ai dû placer les points sur les terrains de baskets mais ça a durée plusieurs heures (plusieurs jours même). commented 2025-12-03 19:40:39 UTC by Lou-Yasmine ♦1 |
| 172174650 (Comments: 1) | kartka (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620639378/history has shop = brewery that was added in this edit shop=brewery ? Is it shop selling alcohol? Or just place producing it? (man_made=works?) Or maybe both? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi... commented 2025-12-03 19:40:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 131836211 (Comments: 1) | Muokkaaja (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9613337351/history has shop = brewery that was added in this edit shop=brewery ? Is it shop selling alcohol? Or just place producing it? (man_made=works?) Or maybe both? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2025-12-03 19:40:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175432753 (Comments: 1) | AmAdEuS92 (Discussed changesets: 1) | addr:city кривой (город называется Москва, а не Речник) и лишний почищу commented 2025-12-03 19:39:41 UTC by literan ♦6,895 |
| 146117631 (Comments: 1) | Jean-Pierre Rondeau (Discussed changesets: 40) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11506692337/history has shop = brocante that was added in this edit shop=brocante ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.op... commented 2025-12-03 19:37:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175460897 (Comments: 1) | Bartek444 (Discussed changesets: 59) | W OSM stosujemy pełne nazwy, skrót OSP powinien zostać rozwinięty commented 2025-12-03 19:29:08 UTC by Szymson ♦446 |
| 175441271 (Comments: 1) | Heismuron (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, welcome to OSM! You have to make sure that the tags you add are exactly as they are described in the wiki or available as presets in your editor. E.g. a "Building" is useless, it has to be "building". commented 2025-12-03 19:09:32 UTC by mueschel ♦6,746 |
| 175334291 (Comments: 4) | sarnek (Discussed changesets: 6) | tak to ja, moje edycje przynoszą prezenty w postaci aktualniejszych, bardziej kompletnych map commented 2025-12-03 19:05:49 UTC by sarnek ♦1 |
| 175459990 (Comments: 1) | DanBikeSwe (Discussed changesets: 2) | WTF commented 2025-12-03 19:02:33 UTC by DanBikeSwe ♦3 |
| 172370650 (Comments: 2) | melb_guy (Discussed changesets: 15) | BTW, area is not needed on landuse! commented 2025-12-03 18:58:50 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦2,828 |
| 170800020 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, eliminaste el centro comercial original que tenia los horarios de apertura https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180373425 y creaste uno nuevo encima, lo mejor es modificar el centro comercial original mejorando las geometrías y/o actua... commented 2025-12-03 18:56:53 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 130584222 (Comments: 2) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 204) | Right here: https://maps.app.goo.gl/PMQAA9Sq44pfkXH78 commented 2025-12-03 18:42:19 UTC by RussNelson ♦51 |
| 175219352 (Comments: 1) | Ростислав Кирій (Discussed changesets: 4) | ого, не знав, що він так зветься, звідки назва? commented 2025-12-03 18:39:57 UTC by Pamey44 ♦6 |
| 170083909 (Comments: 3) | arichnad (Discussed changesets: 20) | and thanks for fixing it! have a nice mapping day! commented 2025-12-03 18:37:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175458687 (Comments: 1) | rumixist (Discussed changesets: 10) | Koşu pistini hem alan olarak hem de yol olarak çizmiştim bu yüzden hata veriyordu. Bu sorunu çözmek için yol olarak çizdiğim şeydeki bazı etiketleri değiştirdim ama bu sefer de çizgi olarak göz... commented 2025-12-03 18:26:24 UTC by rumixist ♦9 |
| 171050902 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hi Lolj, why did you remove the park area? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679327558 ? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171050902 (the red color was removed by you) commented 2025-12-03 18:25:16 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175451635 (Comments: 1) | Anticom76 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This camera is still very into the intersection, what's it mounted on? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175451635 commented 2025-12-03 18:22:38 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175454655 (Comments: 1) | Carlos_Aranda (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. por favor no agregar información privada. Saludos commented 2025-12-03 18:15:08 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 171105737 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, no debes eliminar elementos y volverlos a crear como nuevos ya que se pierde el historial https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial , lo que se debe es mejorar la geometría, no debes colocar abreviaturas https://w... commented 2025-12-03 18:14:19 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 160954577 (Comments: 2) | Ianmia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes they sell carports, sheds, and barns. commented 2025-12-03 18:12:56 UTC by Ianmia ♦1 |
| 174717771 (Comments: 1) | Dave Venables (Discussed changesets: 114) | Thank you for your dilligent work. When making changes like this to work done by a new mapper, it's well worth leaving a comment on the changes you are fixing to share your valuable experience with new mappers. commented 2025-12-03 18:12:33 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 175379564 (Comments: 3) | maddog107 (Discussed changesets: 2) | My bad. I initially left it broken so you could see the problem but then as I was fixing other errors, I came back to it again and not realizing it was one I mentioned to you, I went ahead and fixed it again. I'll let you know if I see another e... commented 2025-12-03 18:03:30 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| X | 175310866 (Comments: 7) | StC (Discussed changesets: 26) | La super route ne change rien. En pratique l’intérêt est uniquement dans l’éditeur de relation de josm qui va afficher un mode chemin de fer qui permet de voir la continuité de l’itinéraire commented 2025-12-03 18:01:34 UTC by pyrog ♦380 |
 | 175429104 (Comments: 1) | Derkoenig (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hallo Derkoenig, danke für deine Korrekturen an *lanes=* mit iD! Ein kleiner Hinweis: Dieser Änderungssatz umfasst Bearbeitungen in sehr weit voneinander entfernten Regionen. Solch überregionale Changesets erschweren anderen Map... commented 2025-12-03 17:59:44 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,987 |
| 171106091 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por qué eliminaste los 38 edificios de la urbanización llamada colseguros norte? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171106091 (lo rojo fue lo que eliminaste) commented 2025-12-03 17:59:30 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175441393 (Comments: 1) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 28) | See also: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175445897 commented 2025-12-03 17:59:05 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,987 |
| 175442257 (Comments: 1) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 28) | See also: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175445897 commented 2025-12-03 17:58:58 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,987 |
| 175445872 (Comments: 1) | K12230LF (Discussed changesets: 28) | See also: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175445897 commented 2025-12-03 17:58:52 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,987 |
| 175440284 (Comments: 1) | Maptapper (Discussed changesets: 21) | As always, thank you for your good work on the map. What are these realignments based on, and are you sure they are more accurate than the previous routes? Writing changeset comments longer than two words helps reviewers understand your... commented 2025-12-03 17:58:14 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 175450036 (Comments: 1) | jekakyiv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello jekakyiv, thank you for your edits with Rapid! A quick note: this edit set contains changes in areas that are very far apart – from Finland to Spain. Such large-scale changes can be difficult for other mappers to follow and make it muc... commented 2025-12-03 17:57:43 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,987 |
| 174989830 (Comments: 1) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 44) | Again, the description "track" makes these changes hard to understand and review. commented 2025-12-03 17:55:29 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 174989190 (Comments: 1) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 44) | Please remember to write helpful, descriptive changeset comments. This modifies eight different ways and adds four, but the description "track" makes it hard for reviewers to understand what you did and why you did it: https://wiki.openstr... commented 2025-12-03 17:52:34 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 171154850 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los 4 bloques de edificios? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171154850 (lo rojo fue lo que eliminaste) commented 2025-12-03 17:50:49 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 164262970 (Comments: 1) | mappinglander (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi, I just noticed that this changeset has a lot of orphaned nodes. https://osmcha.org/changesets/164262970 Could you take a look? Is it safe to delete them? Cheers commented 2025-12-03 17:46:03 UTC by aTarom ♦848 |
| 171427257 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, no debes eliminar edificaciones https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171427257 (edificios eliminados en rojo) y volverlas a crear https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171427733 (los mismos edificios nuevamente creados en amarillo... commented 2025-12-03 17:40:15 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175244824 (Comments: 2) | rumixist (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi! I accidently wrote street names instead of writing "name" for tag title. Thank you for your correction. commented 2025-12-03 17:40:09 UTC by rumixist ♦9 |
| 170256294 (Comments: 2) | vku (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kiitos ohjeistuksesta, tätä en tiennyt. Nyt korjattu. commented 2025-12-03 17:39:50 UTC by vku ♦2 |
| 162025344 (Comments: 11) | pavvv (Discussed changesets: 169) | > w Wrocławiu nie ma oznakowanych granic strefy, tak jak jest to w Krakowie? Są znaki przy drodze przy wjeździe do strefy. Ale strefa płatnego parkowania we Wrocławiu nie oznacza, że każdy miejski parking jest w niej płatny, a jedyn... commented 2025-12-03 17:37:08 UTC by maro21 ♦779 |
| 171500799 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por qué eliminaste el área de barrio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973247868 , las canchas https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562586524 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/717432268 y las 11 edificaciones que est&a... commented 2025-12-03 17:29:52 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 171938932 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los 17 edificios que se ven en la imagen satelital? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171938932 commented 2025-12-03 17:18:32 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 2489509 (Comments: 1) | Geosapiens (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/496872403/history What you think about changing shop=pet_accessories to shop=pet that includes shops selling pet accessories and seems to be a standard? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=pet |
| 8125524 (Comments: 1) | Geosapiens (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/467126241/history What you think about changing shop=pet_accessories to shop=pet that includes shops selling pet accessories and seems to be a standard? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=pet |
| 9927312 (Comments: 1) | gormur (Discussed changesets: 74) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113716073/history What you think about changing shop=pet_accessories to shop=pet that includes shops selling pet accessories and seems to be a standard? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=pet ... commented 2025-12-03 17:10:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 151356064 (Comments: 1) | JLZIMMERMANN (Discussed changesets: 53) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9587698124/history What you think about changing shop=pet_accessories to shop=pet that includes shops selling pet accessories and seems to be a standard? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=pet |
| 175445268 (Comments: 4) | kingkingHK (Discussed changesets: 6) | `not:*=` is for OSM editing only. commented 2025-12-03 17:06:24 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,677 |
| 123143981 (Comments: 2) | svencb (Discussed changesets: 21) | The place still exists according to the website and I assume they are using a combination of the logos of "Mayersche" and "Thalia" at the moment. (Probably migrating to "Thalia" in the long run, but that's speculati... commented 2025-12-03 16:58:29 UTC by svencb ♦15 |
| 175454051 (Comments: 2) | Theo Walbeek (Discussed changesets: 2) | park omgezet naar natural=scrub en een description commented 2025-12-03 16:55:30 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175453905 (Comments: 3) | pitscheplatsch (Discussed changesets: 30) | هذه المساهمه توضيحيه اكثر فى OSM خاصة أن هذه المنطقه حيويه لقائدي السيارات والدراجات الناريه لذالك اري ان من الضروري ان يتم توضيح المس... commented 2025-12-03 16:44:07 UTC by Sara1000 ♦4 |
| 175240576 (Comments: 5) | YPGGUUY (Discussed changesets: 9) | 以后你还是多对一些没人编辑的区域去完善吧，市区部分我会维护的，主要是修起来也很花时间，每周四周五晚上我都会出去到处走走看看的 commented 2025-12-03 16:40:19 UTC by LokNeko ♦19 |
| 175454485 (Comments: 2) | Theo Walbeek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ik heb de naam weer verwijderd. Kijk even goed op de kaart. Het staat toch al aangegeven? MVG eggie commented 2025-12-03 16:36:57 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175416057 (Comments: 2) | I-76 (Discussed changesets: 17) | well, driveways and footpaths commented 2025-12-03 16:36:52 UTC by I-76 ♦40 |
| 175441473 (Comments: 2) | plet (Discussed changesets: 2) | Got it. Thanks for the feedback commented 2025-12-03 16:29:40 UTC by plet ♦2 |
| 172675644 (Comments: 5) | tonyfodora (Discussed changesets: 4) | Väčšina z tých trás má aspoň tabuľu, kde sú singletracky pomenované a vyznačené. commented 2025-12-03 16:20:40 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,037 |
| 175444546 (Comments: 1) | Sara1000 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175453905 commented 2025-12-03 16:18:53 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,707 |
| 175376622 (Comments: 2) | MoG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Corrigé commented 2025-12-03 16:17:34 UTC by MoG ♦2 |
| 175312185 (Comments: 1) | OEleven (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists o... commented 2025-12-03 16:06:52 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 175453132 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 173) | The node that was accidentally created has been removed in changeset 175453288 since it served no real purpose. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175453288 commented 2025-12-03 16:04:58 UTC by TinPetreković ♦188 |
| 175453303 (Comments: 1) | Gerhard24 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Deleted: Überschüssige Sitzbank, Mülleimer. commented 2025-12-03 16:04:53 UTC by Gerhard24 ♦13 |
| 153820912 (Comments: 2) | Halfix (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, sorry this is just a typo and should be surface=mud. I occasionally mix that up because in iD the display description for the tag value "mud" is "Persistently Muddy" and I often set tag values by directly editing the attribut... commented 2025-12-03 15:51:20 UTC by Halfix ♦29 |
| 175324547 (Comments: 1) | Louis Paul (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'itinéraires pédestres qui passent par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. commented 2025-12-03 15:40:11 UTC by StC ♦379 |
| 175449542 (Comments: 1) | KCMapterpiece (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Some of the features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it ... commented 2025-12-03 15:38:49 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 175451873 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 6) | Removed truck restrictions from the middle the street and left only on both ends because there aren't any sings from smaller roads #OptimoRoute osm.org/changeset/175452090 commented 2025-12-03 15:37:03 UTC by JakovRajić ♦2 |
| 175361027 (Comments: 1) | sajeverett (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I've tweaked your changes so that instead of the footway being deleted, it's now marked as disused:highway=footway. This is because it's a public right of way, so it would be likely that someone would re-add the missing section, no... commented 2025-12-03 15:35:45 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 175400168 (Comments: 1) | gaku-tt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task.Please map each building as a separate object. Do not combine multiple nearby buildings into one. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the roofs and look for the gaps ... commented 2025-12-03 15:33:24 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175444737 (Comments: 2) | 5m4u9 (Discussed changesets: 108) | La descripción que puse era en realidad un "note" a mi mismo porque leí una noticia, pero era alarmista porque sí está siendo "tratada" de alguna manera por la misma empresa que gestiona k'ara k�... commented 2025-12-03 15:32:39 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,614 |
| 175451306 (Comments: 1) | bat fragrance (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is that loop of streets four different streets? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175451306 commented 2025-12-03 15:22:12 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175439965 (Comments: 1) | BIKEPACKING_FREUNDE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcher Grund lag vor, dass du aus einem Way einen Node gemacht, und somit die Datenlage verschlechtert hast? Laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dshelter kann man eine "Schutzhütte" auch als Way erfassen. commented 2025-12-03 15:20:33 UTC by Harald Hartmann ♦833 |
| 175414695 (Comments: 1) | fudoreaper (Discussed changesets: 6) | The ESRI imagery seems to have the new updates if you don't zoom in too far, that was enough for me to do some improvements. Take a look and see what you think. commented 2025-12-03 15:19:54 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 175429657 (Comments: 1) | meagullseagull (Discussed changesets: 4) | On the circular path you tagged as a footway with motor_vehicle=designated...is this an alleyway? If so, the motor_vehicle tag could be dropped and highway=service, service=alley would be a better fit. --- ... commented 2025-12-03 15:19:01 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175406274 (Comments: 2) | 02826029060144502929130510688614624 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Meine Entscheidung bleibt so wie sie ist und damit basta!!! Wenn man mit dem Fahrrad hier entlangfahren will, sollten sich KEINE Personen zu fünft oder zu sechst nebeneinander von A nach B bewegen. Auch wenn hier Schrittgeschwindigkeit zu fah... commented 2025-12-03 15:18:11 UTC by 02826029060144502929130510688614624 ♦1 |
| 175441333 (Comments: 1) | Yasmina Bendik (Discussed changesets: 8) | Pourquoi ce changement avec pleins d'erreur de l'aménagement cyclable avec Rue Marcelin Berthelot Béthune ? Peux-tu remettre la version précédente. Merci. commented 2025-12-03 15:17:20 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦236 |
| 175424454 (Comments: 2) | arjunaraoc (Discussed changesets: 16) | I think that a green train entering purple line or vice versa is not going to happen, as they are at different levels. I feel this segment may be useful for shorting the route at Majestic which they do when there is lot of rush or some technical prob... commented 2025-12-03 15:09:36 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦600 |
| 122707267 (Comments: 1) | jande75 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8273839039/history has brand:wikidata = Q1462383 that was added in this edit brand:wikidata=Q1462383 and brand:wikipedia=de:Mayersche Buchhandlung link brand entry that is supposedly not existing anymore |
| 175445615 (Comments: 3) | anshanin (Discussed changesets: 8) | Oh, sorry:) commented 2025-12-03 15:09:18 UTC by Branko Kokanovic ♦337 |
| 153395522 (Comments: 1) | LakatosVL (Discussed changesets: 20) | I think this is an incorrect edit. The track looks like a gravel track with grass up the middle. This isn't a road. commented 2025-12-03 15:05:06 UTC by daveemtb ♦29 |
| 175429164 (Comments: 1) | meagullseagull (Discussed changesets: 4) | It's best to avoid abbreviations like "Rd" when possible. Computers are notoriously bad at expanding abbreviations but can easily create them if desired. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Publishe... commented 2025-12-03 15:02:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175405729 (Comments: 2) | arjunaraoc (Discussed changesets: 16) | I got confused between BMRC and BMTC I realised my mistake after some time and reverted the incorrect changeset myself. Thanks for monitoring and alerting/ correcting. commented 2025-12-03 15:01:20 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦600 |
| 167999251 (Comments: 1) | VLD549 (Discussed changesets: 17) | This change was reverted. Please don't assume that 'paad' is a misspelling. In this province names can be written in Frisian, Dutch, or a local dialect. commented 2025-12-03 15:00:31 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦696 |
| 175423488 (Comments: 1) | Anticom76 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This appears to be between the two eastbound lanes of the street, centered in front of a driveway. Could you provide additional information that could help us position this more accurately? --- Published... commented 2025-12-03 14:58:19 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175423428 (Comments: 1) | Anticom76 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This looks to be about 1 lane into the northeast corner of a large intersection. Could you describe the location of the camera so we could more accurately position it on the map? --- Published using OSMC... commented 2025-12-03 14:57:24 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 160702535 (Comments: 1) | GasaiYuno (Discussed changesets: 63) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030840560/history has building = 93.5 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-03 14:52:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175450189 (Comments: 1) | OSM Contributer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry, I added 4 chowk names not three commented 2025-12-03 14:45:53 UTC by OSM Contributer ♦9 |
| 175248425 (Comments: 5) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 280) | A skąd pochodzi informacja, że jest to tylko i wyłącznie przejście dla zwierząt? Z jakiejś dokumentacji projektowej dotyczącej budowy obwodnicy? commented 2025-12-03 14:34:12 UTC by englu ♦193 |
| 173856197 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los 10 edificios que aparece en la vista satelital ? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173856197 (en rojo estan las eliminaciones) commented 2025-12-03 14:33:41 UTC by German C ♦88 |
 | 174908555 (Comments: 2) | Jempo (Discussed changesets: 2) | I see, thank you for the explanation! I changed it. Hope it is correct now. commented 2025-12-03 14:26:18 UTC by Jempo ♦2 |
| 152572862 (Comments: 1) | rory_070707 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5077552 ? commented 2025-12-03 14:26:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 152585761 (Comments: 1) | rory_070707 (Discussed changesets: 6) | can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5077551 ? commented 2025-12-03 14:25:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 141481625 (Comments: 1) | cmitchell (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209167158/history has roof:levels = hipped that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape commented 2025-12-03 14:22:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175433874 (Comments: 1) | Scarlet12345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for looking at this task. Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before uploading your work. More work is required to complete this task and ensure that it is well mapped: |
| 175434315 (Comments: 1) | eurelien (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, A propos de : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455712106 La clé "route=" sert à renseigner une relation de type route. Ce n'est pas le cas ici, et vu le contexte je ne crois pas nécessaire de cr&ea... commented 2025-12-03 14:16:34 UTC by josmougn ♦243 |
| 159437839 (Comments: 4) | Korgorr (Discussed changesets: 3) | Si tu penses que c'est mieux, pas de problème, tu peux l'éditer ;) commented 2025-12-03 14:15:20 UTC by Korgorr ♦3 |
| 170763673 (Comments: 5) | MichaelFS (Discussed changesets: 52) | Hi MichaelFS, es wird im Wiki empfohlen das source=* an das Changeset anzuhängen, nicht in die OSM Daten. Also das Feld, das in diesem Changeset mit "Eigene Recherche" belegt ist. Ich hoffe das ist einigermaßen verst&au... commented 2025-12-03 14:15:06 UTC by redd ♦450 |
| 175377994 (Comments: 2) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 140) | Ah, good point, I hadn’t realised that tag was deprecated now. Thanks. Added oneway:bicycle=no and cycleway:left:oneway=-1, and changed cycleway:left from opposite_track to track in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175448878 commented 2025-12-03 14:12:14 UTC by gurglypipe ♦953 |
| 175365372 (Comments: 6) | Genépél (Discussed changesets: 4) | Rebonjour, pour le sentier du mont Thabor il y a l'excellent livre de JP Deleglise Orelle autrefois avec des photos du XXe fantastiques du mont et du pic du Thabor. A l'époque c'était plein de glace, le glacier demandait ... commented 2025-12-03 14:11:56 UTC by Genépél ♦3 |
| 175447225 (Comments: 1) | Biff (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hallo, der Eintrag von Gewannnamen in OSM sind immer wieder Thema im Forum. Dabei wird zumeist festgestellt, dass das Namen sind, die uralt und heute nicht mehr gebräulich sind. Dazu können die auch fehlerhaft von gedruckten Karten bzw. ... commented 2025-12-03 14:06:22 UTC by aixbrick ♦878 |
| 174896413 (Comments: 1) | Beachvibes3103 (Discussed changesets: 1) | HI Please restrain your edit to at least two changesets, making other mappers easiler to review --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174896413 commented 2025-12-03 13:51:40 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,537 |
| 124603105 (Comments: 2) | Schaukelflieger (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich checked again. There is no real walking path, just a gap in a fence which people use to switch to the other road. In German its called "Trampelpfad", as the ground is grass, I changed surface=grass, added informal=yes and removed the no... commented 2025-12-03 13:50:47 UTC by Schaukelflieger ♦1 |
| 175439460 (Comments: 1) | digitalfairy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Bus stop name tags must reflect the name as it appears on the sign and in navigation apps (Egg, Moovit, etc.). What name appears on the bus stop sign? P.S. we can talk here in Hebrew if you prefer :) commented 2025-12-03 13:49:38 UTC by NeatNit ♦45 |
| 150939653 (Comments: 1) | Dxniz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Kannst du Hausnummern 40A-F nochmal prüfen ob die Richtung der Nummerierung stimmt. Laut ALKIS genau andersherum. commented 2025-12-03 13:42:41 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,447 |
| 154535355 (Comments: 1) | aka252 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi aka252, Ich habe den von dir erfassen Mülleimer gesucht aber nicht vorgefunden. Kann sein dass du den auf der gegenüberliegenden Seite meinst der bereits erfasst ist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6103698840 Gr&u... commented 2025-12-03 13:41:28 UTC by redd ♦450 |
| 174488924 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, no debes eliminar el centro comercial https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427821649 y poner uno nuevo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449552892 ya que se debe mantener el historial de cambios https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Manten... commented 2025-12-03 13:41:21 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175446536 (Comments: 3) | Schoon Westland Producten (Discussed changesets: 1) | demi_water tag toegevoegd commented 2025-12-03 13:37:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 174300962 (Comments: 3) | michel60 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Bonjour, Merci pour la réponse. Pour info, j'ai retravaillé un peu le landuse à cet endroit. Bonne continuation sur les routes/maxspeed/feux etc! Happy mapping, juminet commented 2025-12-03 13:24:05 UTC by juminet ♦101 |
| 175357876 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 6) | Removed truck restrictions from a part of the way because there isn't a sign for traffic going north-west #OptimoRoute osm.org/changeset/175446344 commented 2025-12-03 13:17:45 UTC by JakovRajić ♦2 |
| 78427000 (Comments: 1) | DJ_frombelgium (Discussed changesets: 6) | Beste, kan u verifieren dat https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/752112242/history/2 , een villagebouw wel degelijk wordt gebruikt voor religieuze doeleinden? commented 2025-12-03 13:17:21 UTC by kabelhaai ♦69 |
| 175362402 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, no debes eliminar la cancha https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680461695, pues esta ya tiene una historia (el área en OSM fue creada en el 2019 y sirve para hacer investigación histórica en OSM de los hábitos de ... commented 2025-12-03 13:16:33 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175437641 (Comments: 2) | paul_sncf_connect (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, Thanks for the check. Fair enough. As a geomatician, I used this method to simplify SQL queries on my end. I usually work on the French network where it is unfortunately quite rare to find stations properly organized in relations... commented 2025-12-03 13:10:03 UTC by paul_sncf_connect ♦2 |
| 175437458 (Comments: 1) | DemolitionAlley (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo DemolitionAlley, "railway=level_crossing" ist für die Kreuzung von Straßen und Bahngleisen. Für die Kreuzung von Fußwegen und Bahngleisen wird "railway=crossing", bzw. "railway=tram_crossing&quo... commented 2025-12-03 13:09:47 UTC by Zrop ♦115 |
 | 175378778 (Comments: 1) | AL HAMD KHALID (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted low quality/questionable/not yet existing features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175445960 commented 2025-12-03 13:05:54 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175423232 (Comments: 1) | ZzzzzzC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted low quality/questionable/not yet existing features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175445960 commented 2025-12-03 13:05:54 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175424422 (Comments: 1) | FredTand (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted low quality/questionable/not yet existing features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175445960 commented 2025-12-03 13:05:54 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 160067915 (Comments: 1) | ethanloy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted low quality/questionable/not yet existing features https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175445960 commented 2025-12-03 13:05:53 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 158984617 (Comments: 11) | JJJWegdam (Discussed changesets: 135) | Merci pour les corrections :-) commented 2025-12-03 13:02:53 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,170 |
| 175329354 (Comments: 1) | Jens Korth at airport-information dot com (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hey Jens, are you aware of the current situation involving Nottingham City Airport whose runways you've retagged as being in use? News outlets have consistently reported this place as having been closed. commented 2025-12-03 13:02:23 UTC by Aethonatic ♦16 |
| 175432187 (Comments: 2) | Anonymous36863 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Благодаря Ви. commented 2025-12-03 13:01:48 UTC by Anonymous36863 ♦12 |
| 152789151 (Comments: 1) | Mandany (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11986912516/history has shop = weather that was added in this edit shop=weather ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.open... commented 2025-12-03 12:56:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175247381 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste el bosque https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702870798, la casa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/727510608 y el cultivo de tomates https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/727510607 ? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?cha... commented 2025-12-03 12:56:28 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 164433315 (Comments: 1) | pippo6 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12723849054/history has shop = sexy_shop that was added in this edit shop=sexy_shop ? Was it supposed to be shop=erotic? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=erotic ? commented 2025-12-03 12:51:26 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175391845 (Comments: 1) | PRys12334556789 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Nie ma tu żadnej budowy wiaduktu. commented 2025-12-03 12:50:46 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,330 |
| 175391999 (Comments: 1) | PRys12334556789 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Most nie jest w budowie. commented 2025-12-03 12:49:37 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,330 |
| 175391962 (Comments: 1) | PRys12334556789 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Brak źródła i niezgodne z tym, co jest w terenie. commented 2025-12-03 12:47:56 UTC by maraf24 ♦5,330 |
| 170007836 (Comments: 1) | Paolo Camporotondo (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13050115605/history has shop = colorificio that was added in this edit Is it paint shop by any chance? Then shop=paint would be better, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=paint commented 2025-12-03 12:43:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175432003 (Comments: 1) | Igors Brūklens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Sveiki, Diemžēl izmaiņas atcēlu, jo tika (nejauši) salauzti citi robežu elementi, tai skaitā Sēlijas poligons vispār izdzēsts. commented 2025-12-03 12:30:44 UTC by HellMap ♦767 |
| 174395606 (Comments: 2) | matty817 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks. I haven't been completely indiscriminate here, but I'll be more careful in the future, particularly as someone else has raised similar concerns. commented 2025-12-03 12:05:54 UTC by matty817 ♦6 |
| 175420773 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverting maxspeed tag since not confirmed by a proper sign and not currently in the scope of the project #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175443719 commented 2025-12-03 12:04:01 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175420690 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revering maxspeed tag since not confirmed by a proper sign and not currently in the scope of the project #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175443671 commented 2025-12-03 12:03:16 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175442537 (Comments: 4) | PMoll76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Peter.. Het is goed gegaan. Kennelijk bewaart je editor de wijzigingen tot je uploadt. Je nieuwe info wordt niet automatisch samengevoegd..Dat heb ik gedaan. Mapse commented 2025-12-03 11:55:38 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175417093 (Comments: 1) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted because a traffic sign which is mandatory was not found in integrated street imagery #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175443378 commented 2025-12-03 11:54:58 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175425820 (Comments: 1) | dakeo (Discussed changesets: 5) | reversado commented 2025-12-03 11:54:40 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175425749 (Comments: 1) | dakeo (Discussed changesets: 5) | reversado commented 2025-12-03 11:54:32 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175425524 (Comments: 1) | dakeo (Discussed changesets: 5) | reversado commented 2025-12-03 11:54:27 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175425481 (Comments: 1) | dakeo (Discussed changesets: 5) | reversado commented 2025-12-03 11:54:24 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175425438 (Comments: 1) | dakeo (Discussed changesets: 5) | reversado commented 2025-12-03 11:54:20 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 163237531 (Comments: 2) | philippec (Discussed changesets: 64) | Het zal wel deze zijn. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.02608705967&lng=2.8689312003764&z=17&pKey=347185893700778&focus=photo De tweede is misschien in het reddingslokaal, maar ik zwem niet. commented 2025-12-03 11:52:47 UTC by philippec ♦749 |
| 175358431 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted because a traffic sign which is mandatory was not found in integrated street imagery #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175443222 commented 2025-12-03 11:50:41 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 158116925 (Comments: 2) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 109) | Hola, gabideardales, No sé exactamente a qué te refieres ni qué quieres que haga. Gracias. RB commented 2025-12-03 11:48:12 UTC by Reino Baptista ♦107 |
| 175417041 (Comments: 1) | MirkoKunac (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted because a traffic sign which is mandatory was not found in integrated street imagery #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175442896 commented 2025-12-03 11:40:04 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175414467 (Comments: 2) | rhhs (Discussed changesets: 69) | True, but it's typically used to tag texts on the object that are not the name of the object. commented 2025-12-03 11:39:48 UTC by rhhs ♦160 |
| 175408583 (Comments: 3) | Jaap de Boer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Eggie, excuus. Ik was niet goed aan het opletten. Sorry voor de verwarring. commented 2025-12-03 11:37:13 UTC by Jaap de Boer ♦1 |
| 175413287 (Comments: 1) | MirkoKunac (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverting because a node was moved #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175442766 commented 2025-12-03 11:35:58 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 172603754 (Comments: 4) | Kronis (Discussed changesets: 3) | Paldies, Tagad viss Strādā korekti. commented 2025-12-03 11:35:02 UTC by Kronis ♦3 |
| 174430762 (Comments: 1) | ijwofawx (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your contribution in the area. It looks great! commented 2025-12-03 11:28:20 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦750 |
| 175434429 (Comments: 1) | Filippo Arnaldi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please don't dump data from external sources into OSM. All these waterways have a large number of foreign tags that should not be in OSM. Please read our import guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guideline... commented 2025-12-03 11:22:25 UTC by mueschel ♦6,746 |
| 175437688 (Comments: 5) | RoelK05 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Ik ga het eerst uitzoeken en daarna overleggen. commented 2025-12-03 10:56:39 UTC by RoelK05 ♦3 |
| 28384826 (Comments: 1) | unmaperomas (Discussed changesets: 53) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324102033/history has id = 21 that was added in this edit What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understan... commented 2025-12-03 10:56:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 165394285 (Comments: 1) | danctc (Discussed changesets: 51) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1380940526/history has id = 4 that was added in this edit What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understan... commented 2025-12-03 10:56:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
 | 150874523 (Comments: 1) | Sonam Tshewang (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11878661425/history has id = 13 that was added in this edit What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to unders... commented 2025-12-03 10:56:09 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 46735094 (Comments: 1) | Shuman (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4727566760/history has id = 27 that was added in this edit What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to underst... commented 2025-12-03 10:56:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175438440 (Comments: 2) | RoelK05 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 👍 commented 2025-12-03 10:55:12 UTC by RoelK05 ♦3 |
| 175193142 (Comments: 3) | Nighto (Discussed changesets: 16) | Abri um bug report no iD mencionando que o bug anterior está acontecendo novamente: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/11632 Antes que eu esqueça: obrigado por notar e reportar :) []s commented 2025-12-03 10:54:27 UTC by Nighto ♦23 |
| 156132352 (Comments: 1) | Jidée (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12153300352 Merci pour ces améliorations. cependant tu as mis une ouverture 24/7 sur une barrière fermée verrouillée. je suppose que l'heure d'ouverture est un... commented 2025-12-03 10:51:53 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,326 |
| 175433037 (Comments: 1) | Mattiz6276 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ciao, con la modifica https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175440874 ho rimosso i nomi dagli edifici e indicato le scale su un nodo in corrispondenza dell'entrata (messo a occhio in base ai percorsi pedonali visibili dalle immagini aeree), qu... commented 2025-12-03 10:47:06 UTC by Mannivu ♦247 |
| 175425806 (Comments: 2) | Comino (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hi, I’ve reviewed the changeset from the mapper who’s been adding bitcoin tags and misusing the name tag for promotional purposes. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175407077 From what I can tell, this node should ... commented 2025-12-03 10:40:33 UTC by Comino ♦266 |
| 175400637 (Comments: 1) | PatrickLude (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, darf ich mal fragen was du mit den maxspeed=100 Einträgen erreichen willst? 100 ist der Default und seine Angabe erzeugt damit keinen Mehrwert. Wenn du darstellen möchtest, dass eine Straße dem deutschen Landstraßen-Default ... commented 2025-12-03 10:32:50 UTC by Halfix ♦29 |
| 175407077 (Comments: 3) | slybtc (Discussed changesets: 3) | Per the OpenStreetMap rules, this counts as advertising. The name=* tag is reserved for the hotel’s actual name, nothing else. Please review [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Go... commented 2025-12-03 10:32:41 UTC by Comino ♦266 |
| 175402929 (Comments: 3) | SomeMapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Poprawiłem to, o czym bot się powtórzył. commented 2025-12-03 10:24:31 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦319 |
| 175395883 (Comments: 1) | ZekOwney (Discussed changesets: 16) | Sympa, je ne connaissais pas! D'ailleurs, l'emprise est sur le cadastre, c'est pas déconnant avec le footway à coté de la place PMR. J'irai un de ces jours voir à quoi il ressemble et si on peut y acc&e... commented 2025-12-03 10:00:52 UTC by divaddivag ♦127 |
| 173140529 (Comments: 2) | FvGordon (Discussed changesets: 218) | There have been two shops Jack & Jones on top of each other, both level 1, so i deleted one of them. commented 2025-12-03 09:59:24 UTC by FvGordon ♦219 |
 | 165293443 (Comments: 1) | fedoroff net (Discussed changesets: 21) | Based on which source name "Кулейский залив / Kulje laht" is added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1379845935 here? In Estonian-language sources that I find "Kulje laht" is used for smaller water area bet... commented 2025-12-03 09:58:11 UTC by Pikse ♦213 |
| 175434998 (Comments: 1) | bdbosman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback De indo heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-03 09:49:25 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 122242462 (Comments: 1) | TLje (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418452726/history has shop = bar that was added in this edit shop=bar? Is it even a shop? Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbar was meant here? commented 2025-12-03 09:44:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 42728525 (Comments: 1) | RafalR (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4437404376/history has shop = coins that was added in this edit shop=coins ? Maybe it can be better tagged as shop=collector collector=coins as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=collector sugges... commented 2025-12-03 09:43:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 173252894 (Comments: 3) | Oderradler (Discussed changesets: 6) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-12-03 09:40:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 145709418 (Comments: 4) | René Altena (Discussed changesets: 4) | so socket:type2_combo:output should be changed, not that power= added (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power for how power= is used) commented 2025-12-03 09:38:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175430527 (Comments: 2) | Andrey Blinov (Discussed changesets: 5) | Не уверен, не видел информации о планируемом восстановлении commented 2025-12-03 09:37:59 UTC by Andrey Blinov ♦3 |
| 175431130 (Comments: 2) | RoelK05 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Dank je wel, ik ga het eens doorlezen. commented 2025-12-03 09:30:46 UTC by RoelK05 ♦3 |
| 175414418 (Comments: 1) | JANEIRO76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bonjour, tu as supprimé de gros éléments dans ce changeset, des éléments qui n'auraient pas dû l'être. Ce que tu fais n'est pas trop mal, mais fait vraiment attention. Je me charge de ... commented 2025-12-03 09:27:35 UTC by AurélienQ ♦146 |
| 174535552 (Comments: 2) | Giovanni Forgione (Discussed changesets: 38) | Il "vecchio" sentiero per scendere a Tordigliano era in alcuni tratti inesistente. La realtà e cioè il sentiero frequentato ed esistente oggi è esattamente quello che ho disegnato io. Si tratta di alternanza di sentiero... commented 2025-12-03 09:22:26 UTC by Giovanni Forgione ♦11 |
| 144637738 (Comments: 1) | HillWithSmallFields (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223714664/history has building:part = 14951 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-03 09:20:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
 | 49256339 (Comments: 1) | Lunne (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4896343289/history has shop = naturista that was added in this edit shop=naturista ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.o... commented 2025-12-03 09:17:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175436381 (Comments: 1) | Darnight14 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 更正：老庄子镇整体被托管到唐山高新区；其中詹官屯村被托管到高新区庆北办事处。 commented 2025-12-03 09:16:15 UTC by Darnight14 ♦1 |
| 171696969 (Comments: 7) | Cortix (Discussed changesets: 10) | Grazie Ivo. commented 2025-12-03 09:15:36 UTC by Angelo Giuseppe ♦20 |
| 137541348 (Comments: 4) | NyanSten (Discussed changesets: 58) | hey, following up on this 2 years later, I've made some proper SVGs for this route shield (and the other 'touring' routes in NZ) – see https://github.com/osm-americana/openstreetmap-americana/pull/1311 let me know if you&#... commented 2025-12-03 09:13:55 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦426 |
| 172291111 (Comments: 2) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thanks, I didn't know this map! commented 2025-12-03 09:10:57 UTC by cuzi ♦136 |
| 166260300 (Comments: 1) | BREYSSE JM (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi BREYSSE JM, this changeset has destroyed the seamark boundary relation 14007237: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14007237/history#map=15/43.27903/5.32208 https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=5.32823&lat=4... commented 2025-12-03 09:07:14 UTC by gscholz ♦2,816 |
| 156893292 (Comments: 3) | radgoat (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-12-03 09:02:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175435823 (Comments: 1) | dzamper (Discussed changesets: 51) | Coś się zadziało z JOSM-em i wysłało się zanim zdążyłem wpisać komentarz. Dodałem tu relacje stop_area dla przystanków commented 2025-12-03 09:01:51 UTC by dzamper ♦172 |
| 175310897 (Comments: 1) | F_User (Discussed changesets: 1) | Добрый день, использовать яндекс карты запрещено в проекте OpenStreetMap. Можно использовать яндекс панорамы (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D... commented 2025-12-03 09:01:30 UTC by dypa ♦153 |
| 160333411 (Comments: 3) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 246) | amenity=fast_food ? or are they not selling it ready to eat commented 2025-12-03 08:57:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 155013706 (Comments: 3) | FelixBrinckmann (Discussed changesets: 1) | changing it then commented 2025-12-03 08:55:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175230527 (Comments: 3) | Flaburgan (Discussed changesets: 4) | C'est corrigé, désolé. commented 2025-12-03 08:53:53 UTC by Flaburgan ♦4 |
| 175428272 (Comments: 1) | matejaads (Discussed changesets: 3) | Super, dzięki za szybką poprawkę commented 2025-12-03 08:53:51 UTC by Marek-M ♦976 |
| 175366914 (Comments: 2) | Waaslander (Discussed changesets: 46) | Thanks for the heads-up. I have removed the tags. They were part of the source dataset. I forgot to delete it. commented 2025-12-03 08:53:37 UTC by Waaslander ♦61 |
| 175200129 (Comments: 4) | Abno85 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin Flo, vielen Dank für die ausführliche Erklärung! :) Ich habe den Schlüssel maxspeed jetzt entsprechend geändert. Viele Grüße! commented 2025-12-03 08:45:16 UTC by Abno85 ♦1 |
| 175415367 (Comments: 1) | kapazao (Discussed changesets: 73) | Corregido el tramo de la A-15 de Gipuzkoa, cuyo nombre me lo indició el Autopistero en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175395902 También se puede ver en ambos idiomas en: https://www.gipuzkoa.eus/es/web/errepideak/carrete... commented 2025-12-03 08:38:44 UTC by Hugoren Martinako ♦229 |
| 175414887 (Comments: 1) | Alitzel Razon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/54484753 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-12-03 08:37:03 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175324215 (Comments: 2) | chris66 (Discussed changesets: 116) | Die Sperrung wird in Kürze aufgehoben wie heute auch im WDR berichtet wurde. Die Note sagt, "gesperrt bis Ende November", kann also entfernt werden. commented 2025-12-03 08:32:00 UTC by chris66 ♦424 |
| 175417227 (Comments: 1) | SimonaHudoletnjak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Change undone in a later changeset #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175417370 commented 2025-12-03 08:19:43 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175235317 (Comments: 2) | LakeTorrens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi 5m4u9, I agree that the current modeling appears to be incorrect or outdated, and I don’t see any clear physical barrier. Unfortunately, the imagery is a bit too unclear for me to confidently verify the full extent of the barrier or d... commented 2025-12-03 08:16:19 UTC by LakeTorrens ♦1 |
| 175406357 (Comments: 1) | Willy Mevissen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dit lijkt me correct Gr eggie commented 2025-12-03 08:16:00 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175431949 (Comments: 2) | RebekkaGU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej, Tak for informationen, jeg har kontaktet Aalborg kommune. commented 2025-12-03 08:13:53 UTC by RebekkaGU ♦1 |
| 175422469 (Comments: 1) | ohdeera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Did you see the https://www.osm.org/note/5076700? commented 2025-12-03 08:11:24 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 174853771 (Comments: 8) | ginzamax (Discussed changesets: 1) | はい、よろしくお願いします。 commented 2025-12-03 08:10:23 UTC by suzunote ♦3 |
| 175423731 (Comments: 1) | Ironfractal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please don't add any shop as landuse and name. Please paint the building and add the shop (with additional description) as node. commented 2025-12-03 08:09:10 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 162708482 (Comments: 3) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 15) | yes, I am pretty sure it is have a nice day! commented 2025-12-03 08:05:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 174968080 (Comments: 6) | Kamerijker (Discussed changesets: 7) | Super, merci! En inderdaad, wordt pas echt nuttig als het min of meer volledig is. Staat al lang op mijn lijstje om eens heel Halle te doen (en dan direct ook surface en sidewalk te checken) commented 2025-12-03 07:48:30 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,386 |
| 150275908 (Comments: 2) | itrivi (Discussed changesets: 39) | ¿De cuál? Por favor, edítalo tú mismo. commented 2025-12-03 07:44:36 UTC by itrivi ♦26 |
| 153456723 (Comments: 2) | *Martin* (Discussed changesets: 115) | opravene commented 2025-12-03 07:29:23 UTC by *Martin* ♦651 |
| 169464467 (Comments: 1) | maferikotupi (Discussed changesets: 47) | Hi maferikotupi, this changeset has destroyed the meadow relation 275973: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/275973#map=13/47.59254/-0.26792 https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-0.24982&lat=47.59189&zoom=1... commented 2025-12-03 07:25:27 UTC by gscholz ♦2,816 |
| 175419629 (Comments: 1) | ThomasA (Discussed changesets: 25) | Når du bruger 'access:conditional', skal du ikke samtidig tagge vejen som værende under 'construction', så forsvinder formålet med 'conditional'. Rettet. commented 2025-12-03 07:25:14 UTC by osmviborg ♦1,730 |
| 169962611 (Comments: 3) | l3BAM (Discussed changesets: 21) | Thanks for your kind response. May be you like to monitor the results of your (and other users) changes on a regular basis to improve the map quality. The French map is full of broken relations and OSMI is a excellent tool to check for errors: |
| 175431622 (Comments: 1) | 우리무 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19089 commented 2025-12-03 07:07:42 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175429346 (Comments: 1) | osm-pt-account 😎 (Discussed changesets: 78) | Please do not add "public_transport=platform" to nodes with "highway=bus_stop" if the platform is mapped seperate, especially if the node has the tag "not:public_transport=platform" commented 2025-12-03 07:06:04 UTC by cowboyxup ♦27 |
| 175430546 (Comments: 1) | mapmap32 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19088 commented 2025-12-03 07:05:07 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175101975 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432120 commented 2025-12-03 07:01:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175136798 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432095 commented 2025-12-03 07:00:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175091578 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432063 commented 2025-12-03 06:58:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175090737 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432063 commented 2025-12-03 06:58:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175091384 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432063 commented 2025-12-03 06:58:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175091274 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432063 commented 2025-12-03 06:58:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175091045 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432063 commented 2025-12-03 06:58:57 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175024355 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432063 commented 2025-12-03 06:58:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175063364 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432063 commented 2025-12-03 06:58:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175023950 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432063 commented 2025-12-03 06:58:56 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175134123 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432015 commented 2025-12-03 06:57:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175133406 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432015 commented 2025-12-03 06:57:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175133596 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432015 commented 2025-12-03 06:57:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175133772 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432015 commented 2025-12-03 06:57:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175133860 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432015 commented 2025-12-03 06:57:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175135366 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432015 commented 2025-12-03 06:57:34 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175099803 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432015 commented 2025-12-03 06:57:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175106305 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432015 commented 2025-12-03 06:57:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175101703 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432015 commented 2025-12-03 06:57:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175101050 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432015 commented 2025-12-03 06:57:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175100489 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432015 commented 2025-12-03 06:57:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175136597 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431925 commented 2025-12-03 06:54:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175135783 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431925 commented 2025-12-03 06:54:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175136292 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431925 commented 2025-12-03 06:54:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175136334 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431925 commented 2025-12-03 06:54:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175136506 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431925 commented 2025-12-03 06:54:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175137960 (Comments: 2) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431827 commented 2025-12-03 06:51:19 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175137893 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431827 commented 2025-12-03 06:51:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175136850 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431827 commented 2025-12-03 06:51:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175137584 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431827 commented 2025-12-03 06:51:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175136978 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431827 commented 2025-12-03 06:51:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175137032 (Comments: 1) | redkopxx (Discussed changesets: 32) | DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431827 commented 2025-12-03 06:51:18 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 173064341 (Comments: 1) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping from undiscussed import https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431520 commented 2025-12-03 06:39:08 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 173026260 (Comments: 3) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping from undiscussed import https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431520 commented 2025-12-03 06:39:08 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 173027456 (Comments: 1) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping from undiscussed import https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431520 commented 2025-12-03 06:39:08 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 173027505 (Comments: 1) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping from undiscussed import https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431520 commented 2025-12-03 06:39:08 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 173065347 (Comments: 1) | Leonardo Gutierrez (Discussed changesets: 28) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping from undiscussed import https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431520 commented 2025-12-03 06:39:08 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175430999 (Comments: 1) | tordans (Discussed changesets: 142) | Sorry, reverted in https://osmcha.org/changeset/175431342 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175430999 commented 2025-12-03 06:34:08 UTC by tordans ♦425 |
| 175427568 (Comments: 2) | 리릴리 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19087 commented 2025-12-03 06:33:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175428934 (Comments: 2) | GUNPO (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19086 commented 2025-12-03 06:31:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175393916 (Comments: 2) | slybtc (Discussed changesets: 3) | The hotel part (rooms) are primarily used for company staff and occasionally other travellers can make bookings on third-party platforms. commented 2025-12-03 06:27:28 UTC by slybtc ♦2 |
| 175429522 (Comments: 1) | WJaWJa (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19085 commented 2025-12-03 06:24:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175428884 (Comments: 2) | wonnnee (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19084 commented 2025-12-03 06:21:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175429067 (Comments: 1) | conan0904 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19083 commented 2025-12-03 06:19:17 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175429337 (Comments: 1) | 신성남변전소 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19082 commented 2025-12-03 06:16:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175397703 (Comments: 1) | Obernetter (Discussed changesets: 14) | Die östliche Anbindung an den Bürgersteig fehlt nun. commented 2025-12-03 05:36:12 UTC by Bienson ♦363 |
| 174748626 (Comments: 1) | marc__marc (Discussed changesets: 39) | Thanks for the correction. I had confused genus with taxon. I’ll be careful from now on. commented 2025-12-03 05:29:56 UTC by あじさか ♦12 |
| 175428502 (Comments: 1) | GUNPO (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175428528 commented 2025-12-03 04:27:32 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175428464 (Comments: 1) | GUNPO (Discussed changesets: 3) | Fix Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175428488 commented 2025-12-03 04:25:41 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175366166 (Comments: 1) | lotharben333 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Another problem is when you draw the fairway and it crisscrosses over other elements (like the bunker near the green). You should share every node at the boundary between the two (if you aren't leaving a gap). Some helpful information can be gle... commented 2025-12-03 04:23:41 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 175117040 (Comments: 2) | LakePoopó (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Ruslan Fatih, thanks for reaching out!
Apple has an agreement with Vantor Hub (Previously Maxar) to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use t... commented 2025-12-03 04:23:04 UTC by LakePoopó ♦2 |
| 173740149 (Comments: 1) | Krithikrb (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, thank you for your changes! I reclassified this section as highway=trunk + expressway=yes, because as far as I can tell, it is a national highway, not an expressway. It uses the standard green NH signs, and doesn't have the expressway signag... commented 2025-12-03 04:19:07 UTC by uknown-gryphus ♦40 |
| 175367901 (Comments: 1) | lotharben333 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Lothar, Please don't delete a valid fairway like this only to recreate a nearly identical fairway moments later. It's best to keep the history of the fairway and all of its previous versions for people to review and understand why... commented 2025-12-03 04:18:32 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 175426520 (Comments: 4) | ekckeksehlsmsepdhotlzu (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19081 commented 2025-12-03 04:16:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 171806395 (Comments: 1) | CowCowManThingit (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Thanks for adding all this lovely stuff. You had one side stream segment that was pointed upstream, I fixed it up but something to pay attention to for sure. Happy mapping! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429116693/history#map... commented 2025-12-03 03:26:52 UTC by watmildon ♦261 |
| 175305791 (Comments: 1) | Bartholomeus2909 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is there really a park named "Lowfield Garden" here? On aerial imagery I see houses here. Either you are trying to map a private garden—and in that case it should definitely not be mapped as a public park—or you ar... commented 2025-12-03 02:58:52 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,663 |
| 175424341 (Comments: 2) | dlEKsrjdhogodieho (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19080 commented 2025-12-03 02:29:45 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175424742 (Comments: 7) | 권윤성 (Discussed changesets: 5) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19079 commented 2025-12-03 02:27:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175425214 (Comments: 1) | won32 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19078 commented 2025-12-03 02:23:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175426048 (Comments: 1) | _Kostka_ (Discussed changesets: 16) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-03 02:22:05 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175426167 (Comments: 2) | 레몬유자 (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175426210 commented 2025-12-03 02:20:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175426130 (Comments: 1) | 레몬유자 (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175426210 commented 2025-12-03 02:20:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175416841 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por qué esta eliminando esta área de bosque? (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175416841) commented 2025-12-03 02:17:15 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175416874 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿Por que estas eliminando esta area de bosqué? commented 2025-12-03 02:12:59 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175417735 (Comments: 1) | Lolj (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hola Lolj, ¿por qué borraste los edificios? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175417735 commented 2025-12-03 02:03:44 UTC by German C ♦88 |
| 175424709 (Comments: 2) | 권윤성 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Fix vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175425910 commented 2025-12-03 01:57:03 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175424770 (Comments: 2) | 권윤성 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Fix vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175425899 commented 2025-12-03 01:56:00 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175392052 (Comments: 2) | spam46200 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12846853759 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-12-03 01:43:10 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 135095303 (Comments: 2) | vmanulik (Discussed changesets: 23) | Та ПЦУ, вибачайте, промахнувся. Поправив commented 2025-12-03 01:42:12 UTC by vmanulik ♦12 |
| 19560421 (Comments: 1) | yakingman (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2588622274/history has shop = hardwood_lumber that was added in this edit shop=hardwood_lumber ? Why not shop=trade trade=timber ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtrade commented 2025-12-03 01:08:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 147854680 (Comments: 1) | artursamenezes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1254311529/history has building = 1850 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-03 01:07:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175392173 (Comments: 2) | kosmgeolan (Discussed changesets: 10) | Добрый день! Прочитала рекомендации. Учту. Спасибо за комментарий commented 2025-12-03 00:56:49 UTC by kosmgeolan ♦8 |
| 175424470 (Comments: 1) | 권윤성 (Discussed changesets: 5) | the information I deleted pertains to facilities regulated as secure facilities under South Korean law that are displayed on the map. The disclosure of information such as addresses and routes to civilians is considered illegal in the country to whic... commented 2025-12-03 00:49:42 UTC by 권윤성 ♦5 |
| 175424335 (Comments: 2) | 권윤성 (Discussed changesets: 5) | The information I deleted pertains to facilities regulated as secure facilities under South Korean law that are displayed on the map. The disclosure of information such as addresses and routes to civilians is considered illegal in the country to whic... commented 2025-12-03 00:41:49 UTC by 권윤성 ♦5 |
| 175341608 (Comments: 1) | Hoàng Sa (Discussed changesets: 6) | Đề nghị đặt thẻ access=no commented 2025-12-03 00:29:44 UTC by ZioDragon ♦15 |
| 174876663 (Comments: 1) | SithMaster (Discussed changesets: 4) | I reverted some of these changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175424620 - please do not change tags to remove the : - they were correct as they were commented 2025-12-03 00:24:56 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 174876719 (Comments: 1) | SithMaster (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted - you duplicated a building that was already here commented 2025-12-03 00:17:02 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
 | 174971583 (Comments: 2) | SithMaster (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175424425 - perhaps in the future if you think something was tagged incorrectly you could contact the user that mapped it instead of making destructive incorrect changes? For the record - using a co... commented 2025-12-03 00:12:00 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 175423720 (Comments: 1) | YMAMC (Discussed changesets: 1) | You inadvertently dragged a section of Campion Grange, which is why the editor displayed so many warnings. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175424400 commented 2025-12-03 00:11:35 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 175312896 (Comments: 1) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 7) | Oops - I think that something's gone a bit wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238218979#map=19/52.032914/-0.550840 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238218977#map=19/52.033010/-0.550553 . They used to join - see https://overpass-t... commented 2025-12-03 00:05:39 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 174970701 (Comments: 1) | SithMaster (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175424358 - I suggest you learn what "standard tags" are before you start making damaging mass edits to OSM commented 2025-12-03 00:05:28 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 175035674 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 905) | Hi, it would have been better to do a complete revert of changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174970701 as it was basically all vandalism commented 2025-12-03 00:04:48 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 172984088 (Comments: 2) | Skyryk (Discussed changesets: 1) | This was indeed a mistake. Thank you for catching that. Will correct. commented 2025-12-02 23:58:32 UTC by Skyryk ♦1 |
| 109595502 (Comments: 1) | AxelBoldt (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo Axelboldt, Du hast bei der Roten Kapelle die 1 Uhr zu 13:00 Uhr geändert statt 01:00 Uhr. Umso interessanter, dass das 4 Jahr niemanden aufgefallen ist bei einem durchaus populärem Lokal mitten in Stuttgart. Grü&... commented 2025-12-02 23:32:48 UTC by redd ♦450 |
| 175419048 (Comments: 1) | SimonaHudoletnjak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted because of a wrong tag used and also the restriction was not confirmed by a road sign #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175423262 commented 2025-12-02 23:05:21 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175417896 (Comments: 1) | SimonaHudoletnjak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Fixed tags missed by a team member Fixes in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175423140 commented 2025-12-02 23:00:55 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175417491 (Comments: 1) | SimonaHudoletnjak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Fixed missing tags caused by another team member. Fixes in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175422878 commented 2025-12-02 22:57:22 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 151126919 (Comments: 2) | mathiaseicher (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich habe den POI gelöscht. OSM ist kein Dienstleister-Verzeichnis, und schon gar nicht eines für Dienstleister ohne konkrete und korrekte Adresse. commented 2025-12-02 22:50:35 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,493 |
| 174741056 (Comments: 1) | Szymson (Discussed changesets: 280) | Dziękuję :) commented 2025-12-02 22:50:30 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦822 |
| 168275273 (Comments: 3) | yxoc (Discussed changesets: 21) | Merci pour ton retour. je te laisse ajouter le nom et nom alternatif après avoir vérifié si tu le souhaites ? oui je parle de la borne de l'autre côté de la rue que je pense être lié à ... commented 2025-12-02 22:45:51 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,326 |
| 175045222 (Comments: 1) | Maty_SK (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, myslím že railway=construction by malo byť railway=proposed, nevidela som nikde, že by sa už začalo stavať. Ale radšej sa spýtam, než aby som začala edit war commented 2025-12-02 22:29:33 UTC by 1Mmarek ♦10 |
| 175422191 (Comments: 1) | boysha12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I see that you requested a review. Your changes were very good. One additional tip for mapping houses is making all the corners rectangular. In the iD editor (the one you used), you can do that by selecting a house and hitting Q on your ke... commented 2025-12-02 22:29:18 UTC by PizzaTreeIsland ♦42 |
| 168910484 (Comments: 1) | Aleksander | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 29) | Już otwarte? commented 2025-12-02 22:21:23 UTC by Dawid2849 ♦822 |
| 175249339 (Comments: 1) | Silvance Okoth (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted. I do not understand what you wanted to map. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175422168 commented 2025-12-02 22:20:55 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦361 |
| 175249258 (Comments: 1) | Silvance Okoth (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175422077 commented 2025-12-02 22:17:25 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦361 |
| 175419787 (Comments: 1) | matejaads (Discussed changesets: 3) | Takie miejsce nie jest szpitalem. Tutaj bardziej pasuje szablon przychodni (`amenity=doctors`) commented 2025-12-02 22:17:11 UTC by Marek-M ♦976 |
| 175419858 (Comments: 1) | matejaads (Discussed changesets: 3) | Takie miejsce nie jest szpitalem. Tutaj bardziej pasuje szablon przychodni (`amenity=doctors`) commented 2025-12-02 22:16:47 UTC by Marek-M ♦976 |
| 175385158 (Comments: 1) | Levanter66 (Discussed changesets: 1) | If you check the counties parcel map, https://www.skagitcounty.net/Maps/iMap/?mapjs=parcel this road is named. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#National_Forest_Road_System suggests how to add FR1570 as a ref tag. Can yo... commented 2025-12-02 22:09:05 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| X | 175369389 (Comments: 3) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | I've also removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13345949537 as it duplicated https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2823719 commented 2025-12-02 21:48:21 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 175376927 (Comments: 6) | RandomThighsEnjoyer (Discussed changesets: 6) | Guter Tipp für die Zukunft. Werde ich mir merken. commented 2025-12-02 21:45:33 UTC by RandomThighsEnjoyer ♦5 |
| 175407373 (Comments: 5) | run'n'ride (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello, Andy from the Data Working Group here - just picking up a couple of points from the above: > I also confirm on OS maps. For the avoidance of doubt, we can't use that as a source for OSM, unless it's either out of... commented 2025-12-02 21:43:11 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 156971104 (Comments: 3) | Titi72 T (Discussed changesets: 10) | J'ai pris ce changement mais j'aurais pu un prendre un plus récent :), le but était surtout de vous donner des conseils. Voila le lien vers le sujet sur le forum https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/lutte-contre-la-namite/31885... commented 2025-12-02 21:42:24 UTC by jbcharron ♦147 |
| X | 175365597 (Comments: 4) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | The following nodes were removed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13345312563 duplicated https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2823200 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13345312564 duplicated https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2955... commented 2025-12-02 21:36:49 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 174827683 (Comments: 1) | animebirder (Discussed changesets: 13) | I believe this is actually a river - per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream a stream can be jumped across by an "active, able-bodied person". By this definition, very few streams are visible on aerial imagery, and con... commented 2025-12-02 21:24:28 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦27 |
| 175418517 (Comments: 2) | kiwi75 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Oh sorry, I missed the forum message! My workflow seems to be out of order today. commented 2025-12-02 21:08:13 UTC by ika-chan! ♦311 |
| 174888473 (Comments: 2) | Techtips3000 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Henri, ursprünglich war nur eine kurze Sperrung vom 24.11. bis 28.11. geplant, da zwei Kräne für die Renovierung des Knorr-Bremse-Gebäudes aufgestellt werden sollten. Offenbar gab es jedoch technische und organisatori... commented 2025-12-02 21:08:11 UTC by Techtips3000 ♦1 |
| 175417427 (Comments: 2) | meagullseagull (Discussed changesets: 4) | The newly constructed building (behind tribal affairs building) was originally intended to serve only as a bereavement center, but it is now also rented out for events such as birthdays, graduations, and weddings in addition to funeral services. The ... commented 2025-12-02 21:00:47 UTC by meagullseagull ♦1 |
| 175072161 (Comments: 1) | TobiasMartin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo TobiasMartin, wurde das Gleisstück von GHleis 2 an der westlichen Bahnhofseinfahrt wieder eingebaut? Es wurde ja erst Mitte diesen Jahre entfernt und es sah nicht so aus, dass man es zeitnah wieder aufbauen würde. commented 2025-12-02 20:50:05 UTC by granitschädel ♦20 |
| 174857277 (Comments: 3) | Samuel Jacob Schweizer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo Samuel Jacob Schweizer, Es gibt es sehr viele Möglichkeiten. Verbots- und Informationsschilder können immer erfasst werden, z. B. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:information. Für den Weg selbst stehen ebenfal... commented 2025-12-02 20:45:14 UTC by Beau Jonckers ♦18 |
| 175018657 (Comments: 2) | yukawa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo pitfire, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ja, ich verstehe, da hatte ich nicht drüber nachgedacht. Hab wieder was dazu gelernt. Ich habe die Änderung jetzt Rückgängig gemacht und mit dem Lebenszyklus-Präfix den Abri... commented 2025-12-02 20:43:53 UTC by yukawa ♦5 |
| 148025919 (Comments: 2) | acubens71 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Salut, malheureusement j'habite à l'autre bout de la région, ce n'est pas du tout un coin où je peux aller de moi-même :( Niveau vérif : il y a tjs une trace sur Strava, mais faible, et sur l�... commented 2025-12-02 20:35:16 UTC by acubens71 ♦40 |
| 175417795 (Comments: 1) | Ajper (Discussed changesets: 12) | Ahoj, z akého dôvodu si zmazal celý plot od Argi Academy až popri skládke odpadu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106138407/history)? Na Ortofoto je jasne vidieť, že plot existuje, a stačilo upraviť len tú... commented 2025-12-02 20:30:55 UTC by t_ja ♦225 |
| 171218454 (Comments: 2) | Maxoucarto (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Mateusz ! Yes indeed it's a typo, thanks for noticing it. I just fixed it now. Best regards, Maxime commented 2025-12-02 20:29:14 UTC by Maxoucarto ♦2 |
 | 175413772 (Comments: 1) | J00SECI (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello, Can you please stop adding these landuse areas to the existing elements? It is way better to add new elements that actually modifying or deleting the existing ones. You could add the land use tag to almost any existing ele... commented 2025-12-02 20:24:26 UTC by porfiriopaiz ♦119 |
| 167564935 (Comments: 2) | userosmde (Discussed changesets: 1) | ??? - Ort ist weiter vorhanden. Real und virtuell. commented 2025-12-02 20:17:26 UTC by userosmde ♦1 |
| 175416725 (Comments: 1) | donux-nl (Discussed changesets: 42) | Dag donux. Lijkt me correct zo. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-02 19:55:41 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175405178 (Comments: 5) | Jhonatan07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Estoy revisando con el ruteador de la página y funciona perfecto. ¿Cuál es el problema? Por favor contestar por acá los mensajes, no en el privado. commented 2025-12-02 19:55:26 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 144905192 (Comments: 2) | zstadler (Discussed changesets: 124) | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175417196 commented 2025-12-02 19:37:04 UTC by zstadler ♦1,101 |
| 175413682 (Comments: 1) | alicemaps (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-02 19:35:48 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175416679 (Comments: 1) | number975312468 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-02 19:33:19 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175416507 (Comments: 1) | SXNW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-02 19:30:49 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175376133 (Comments: 1) | Rampe76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tuosta verenhimoisesta koirasta voisit kertoa mieluummin vaikka description-tägissä :D Ja barrier-tägin arvoksi se mikä fyysinen este tiellä on. commented 2025-12-02 19:28:12 UTC by dremdau ♦15 |
| 175384354 (Comments: 1) | fuzzyorange (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ha, I drove past and noticed the "Puffin Palace" vape shop this morning, and was going to add it, but you beat me to the punch! :P commented 2025-12-02 19:23:42 UTC by hoserab ♦212 |
| 167619871 (Comments: 1) | geogidon (Discussed changesets: 37) | Actually, I believe this to be a river. A stream is small enough in width that it can be jumped across by an "active, able-bodied person", which does not fit the definition of almost any named waterway in Texas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-12-02 19:19:49 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦27 |
| 175163342 (Comments: 1) | cedotix (Discussed changesets: 3) | please try and keep edits to one state or region commented 2025-12-02 19:17:31 UTC by dmjab13 ♦53 |
| 175162411 (Comments: 1) | cedotix (Discussed changesets: 3) | please try and keep edits to one region or state commented 2025-12-02 19:17:13 UTC by dmjab13 ♦53 |
| 175379463 (Comments: 1) | Carkedykus (Discussed changesets: 4) | Beste Carkedykus, Ik zie dat je hier een aantal landuse=retail vlakken hebt toegevoegd, hierbij zijn de vlakken aan de bestaande wegen geplakt. Het is niet de bedoeling dat vlakken aan wegen geplakt worden. Ik zou graag zien dat ... commented 2025-12-02 19:12:36 UTC by Tjuro ♦237 |
| 175346891 (Comments: 1) | cedotix (Discussed changesets: 3) | please try to keep edits in one state or region commented 2025-12-02 19:12:32 UTC by dmjab13 ♦53 |
| 175374052 (Comments: 1) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | dawg how did you make edits in Toronto and Antarctica commented 2025-12-02 19:11:19 UTC by dmjab13 ♦53 |
| 175390776 (Comments: 1) | growandglowagency (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-02 19:01:24 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175415100 (Comments: 1) | slybtc (Discussed changesets: 3) | Name of the hotel is: Hotel Margrethe Not: Hotel Margrethe (AirBtc.com booking only) Please refrain from advertising on OSM. commented 2025-12-02 18:58:46 UTC by Comino ♦266 |
| 139049543 (Comments: 9) | run'n'ride (Discussed changesets: 17) | 12pjw34 is still at it, damaging the map, nothing has changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175407373#map=16/51.66596/-2.31429 commented 2025-12-02 18:50:01 UTC by letsridebikes ♦70 |
| 175338726 (Comments: 1) | cotonouakchottawarsaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for making this change. Fyi your edit removed building=apartments which I have just restored. commented 2025-12-02 18:45:38 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 156094062 (Comments: 2) | jogging-stats (Discussed changesets: 5) | hey! sorry, yes. It's drit. commented 2025-12-02 18:44:32 UTC by jogging-stats ♦5 |
| 175044794 (Comments: 4) | Grzegorz_Kujawa (Discussed changesets: 23) | Specjalistą od budowli inżynieryjnych nie jestem, ale tam, mimo wszystko, widzę przepust, a nie most. Wspomniałem o wielkości drogi i strumienia, dlatego że - chociaż nie jest to regułą - mosty są budowane na szerszych ciekach i tam, gd... commented 2025-12-02 18:39:50 UTC by Grzegorz_Kujawa ♦37 |
| 175415097 (Comments: 1) | Autopistero20502020 (Discussed changesets: 37) | Enlace Catalogo oficial de las Carreteras de la Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa: https://www.gipuzkoa.eus/documents/2890238/2931564/Cat%C3%A1logo+Actualizado.pdf/6ccff55c-6249-911a-18f5-dc950e9964cd commented 2025-12-02 18:32:33 UTC by Autopistero20502020 ♦34 |
| 175395902 (Comments: 1) | Hugoren Martinako (Discussed changesets: 64) | @Hugoren, gracias por corregir. Como ya comenté antes que no debería de ser toda la autovía desde Medinaceli hasta Astigarraga. Por cierto, oficialmente no es Autovía de Navarra, es Autopista Navarra-Gipuzkoa, segú... commented 2025-12-02 18:29:22 UTC by Autopistero20502020 ♦34 |
| 174919443 (Comments: 1) | MK 1 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hi MK 1, I noticed this primary way was reclassified to service (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1357884550). Service ways are generally reserved for local access and are used for “access to a building, parking lot, service station, bu... commented 2025-12-02 18:19:23 UTC by tabletennisfan ♦1 |
| 175410238 (Comments: 1) | Valermon TIBER (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее. |
| 140822267 (Comments: 1) | Jbah (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Jbah, From node 10679004016 touched in this CS: >fixme=someone please double check in person. I'm doubting my memory since I can't find any news articles of it having been removed... Midgårdsbrønden still... commented 2025-12-02 18:11:06 UTC by mikini ♦60 |
| 175080842 (Comments: 5) | Grzegorz_Kujawa (Discussed changesets: 23) | Faktycznie, ma to sens, co poprzednio napisałeś. Zostawiam Ci zmianę Folwarcznej na "residential" i dopasowanie kategorii okolicznych dróg. commented 2025-12-02 18:08:50 UTC by Grzegorz_Kujawa ♦37 |
| 171667541 (Comments: 4) | EfreetSK (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ano, je to smutne, ked su znacky len z jednej strany, tak ako to potom maju ludia chapat a dodrziavat. A ako zmapovat. Sice niektore vlastnosti vieme urobit aj smerove, ale je sporne, ci to tak je naozaj na ceste myslene. Ako ste to spravili bude zat... commented 2025-12-02 18:05:52 UTC by aceman444 ♦2,746 |
| 128462454 (Comments: 2) | jmaspons (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hola, Si pots comprovar-ho sobre el terreny i corregir-ho, endavant. Jo no les tinc totes. Mirant el mapa topogràfic de l'ICGC sembla que et dona la raó, però l'etiqueta name:etymology:wikidata apunta a un poble que s&#... commented 2025-12-02 18:03:20 UTC by jmaspons ♦72 |
| 174539054 (Comments: 2) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 10) | Yeah, I'm debating on what to do here, but I'm leaning on removing trunk tags from Pacific Hwy east of Barnett Ave and tag the rest of Barnett Ave and Lytton St to Rosecrans. I did have a DM with the suggestion to connect the trunk roads a... commented 2025-12-02 17:50:13 UTC by Yushclay ♦12 |
| 175399266 (Comments: 1) | JPodlas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bardzo fajny zestaw zmian na start! commented 2025-12-02 17:45:33 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦319 |
| 144735760 (Comments: 2) | joel56dt (Discussed changesets: 21) | Fixed, thanks. commented 2025-12-02 17:44:16 UTC by joel56dt ♦187 |
| 172229303 (Comments: 2) | YPGGUUY (Discussed changesets: 9) | 复 @j333-1145: 如果路中具有双黄线或导流线, 按我国交通法车辆不能越过或掉头; 或路宽超过一定程度, 不利行人横越的, 我赞同画成双线路. 这样对于维护公交关系, 行人和自行车导航都有显著... commented 2025-12-02 17:41:33 UTC by YPGGUUY ♦33 |
| 156159223 (Comments: 2) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 62) | Just a typo. Fixed in latest CS. Thank you! commented 2025-12-02 17:40:22 UTC by eerib ♦213 |
| 175291628 (Comments: 6) | leveskockaa (Discussed changesets: 37) | Áh, trolikat elfelejtettem, de egy taxi=no akkor is kellene mellé, mert az nem BKK. Nekünk azt kell térképezni ami a szabályos és a helyszínen felmérhető, nem azt ahogy "szokt&... commented 2025-12-02 17:36:05 UTC by infeeeee ♦616 |
| 175385606 (Comments: 3) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 10) | Yeah, I guess I went too far for this one. I'll undo it. The logic I was going with was expressway being mostly controlled access with and little to no contact with the opposing direction outside of intersections. commented 2025-12-02 17:33:35 UTC by Yushclay ♦12 |
| 175400331 (Comments: 3) | RandomThighsEnjoyer (Discussed changesets: 6) | In dem fall waren mit einem mal mehrere wege übereinander. Es gab einen der jeweils von Einfahrt zu Einfahrt ging. und dann waren jeweils 20 Wege dazwischen jeweils von node zu node. Und die wege hatten dann noch einen lustigen strauss an unters... commented 2025-12-02 17:32:58 UTC by flohoff ♦2,414 |
| 174311316 (Comments: 2) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 10) | Ah yeah, I tagged that one as trunk before I learned about the 2022 Hwy Classification Guidelines. I'll undo this one. commented 2025-12-02 17:27:39 UTC by Yushclay ♦12 |
| 175389427 (Comments: 1) | kubaban2 (Discussed changesets: 10) | a ma sens to do highway=motorway podnosić jak to jest taki szczątkowy odcinek? po co to? commented 2025-12-02 17:26:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 159171195 (Comments: 3) | Nadjita (Discussed changesets: 51) | Die Genossenschaft habe ich als operator in die Gebäude verlagert. Die Fläche macht als Quartier am Ende wenig Sinn, wenn sie keinen Eigennamen hat. Daher habe ich das Quartier entfernt, und die umliegende residential area bis an die... commented 2025-12-02 17:21:44 UTC by osmmapper222 ♦41 |
| 175410523 (Comments: 2) | tersmitten (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks commented 2025-12-02 17:15:23 UTC by tersmitten ♦2 |
| 175410768 (Comments: 2) | tersmitten (Discussed changesets: 3) | Voor nu in ieder geval. Ze gaan dat grijze stuk teruggeven aan de natuur. Maar ze zijn er nu aan het slopen en saneren. commented 2025-12-02 17:14:53 UTC by tersmitten ♦2 |
| 175308681 (Comments: 2) | Jesús Gómez (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hola Kapazao. Lo siento, desconocía que se había tomado esa decisión . addr:city yo también la considero necesaria, al menos en zonas de población dispersa. Hay casos en que una misma vía tiene el m... commented 2025-12-02 17:11:37 UTC by Jesús Gómez ♦38 |
 | 175405132 (Comments: 1) | DslAz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Details of this building’s geographic location and surrounding areas: Local Name: জোহাওয়ার্ল্ড (name:bn) ZuhaWorld (name:en) Type: Apartment Building House Number: 265 Area: Muradpur Word: 52 ... commented 2025-12-02 17:11:13 UTC by DslAz ♦1 |
| 169055461 (Comments: 1) | jubonhomme (Discussed changesets: 2) | Le commerce a déménagé dans le parking :) commented 2025-12-02 17:01:13 UTC by jbcharron ♦147 |
| 172748495 (Comments: 3) | dblanzac (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour, Dorian. Je pense que, vu la longueur de votre réponse, je vais la reprendre dans la messagerie privée et vous répondre par ce biais ; non pas que je veuille dissimuler nos échanges, mais vu la longueur... commented 2025-12-02 17:00:53 UTC by Penegal ♦31 |
| 175383165 (Comments: 3) | Cristian Velozo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. No se habló de eliminar nada. Solo de no usar un nombre descriptivo para el camino y el tag de escuela en algo que no es una escuela. Saludos commented 2025-12-02 16:53:24 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175410821 (Comments: 1) | tersmitten (Discussed changesets: 3) | Je zou private kunnen toevoegen. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-02 16:48:05 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175364283 (Comments: 1) | MFT1330 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. Please don't use the name tag field for descriptions. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions commented 2025-12-02 16:38:59 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 12641995 (Comments: 1) | blackadder (Discussed changesets: 33) | I realise that this edit was made a very long time ago, but would the un-gated and unadopted streets within the Four Oaks Park private estate now be better tagged as ownership=private + access=destination ? commented 2025-12-02 16:25:34 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 174308000 (Comments: 1) | Dark_Valor (Discussed changesets: 19) | Please don't remove names from sidewalks. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174308000 commented 2025-12-02 16:17:33 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 174555047 (Comments: 1) | Dark_Valor (Discussed changesets: 19) | This has been a diverging diamond interchange for a few years now. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175409773 commented 2025-12-02 16:15:19 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175030876 (Comments: 1) | Gerhard24 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Falsche Anmerkung: "Changed: Steig A&B an neue Position versetzt". Steig A&B waren bereits am richtigen Ort und ich habe die Lage beibehalten. commented 2025-12-02 16:14:21 UTC by Gerhard24 ♦13 |
| 175404844 (Comments: 1) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 17) | Please make sure the data you're updating against is actually still valid and relevant. This has been a diverging diamond interchange for years at this point. It's generally inadvisable to map places you haven't been and aren&#... commented 2025-12-02 16:10:15 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175408710 (Comments: 5) | denniskuijs (Discussed changesets: 4) | No problem.. commented 2025-12-02 16:09:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175406279 (Comments: 2) | Willy Mevissen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Het adres heb ik hersteld.. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175406279 MVG eggie commented 2025-12-02 16:03:36 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175349626 (Comments: 5) | Pablo Strubell (Discussed changesets: 9) | I am sorry I screwed it with the change, since Original Maps was the only field where i could input the info. I also use Every door, but could not edit the info there. In any case the location is wrong. The right one is the one i mentioned. T... commented 2025-12-02 16:00:33 UTC by Pablo Strubell ♦8 |
| 175409077 (Comments: 1) | surveyor54 (Discussed changesets: 141) | CS-Korrektur: Naturschutzgebiet "Hollenhaus" eingepflegt commented 2025-12-02 15:58:31 UTC by surveyor54 ♦664 |
| 175179330 (Comments: 2) | SaltonSea (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi mweper, thank you for reaching out and letting me know. I will be more aware of this moving forward. traducción automática: Hola, mweper, gracias por contactarme y avisarme. Tendré más cuidado la p... commented 2025-12-02 15:57:30 UTC by SaltonSea ♦3 |
| 167285278 (Comments: 4) | BrummsLee (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ah ok., kein Thema. Ich hatte mir das eigentlich auch hinter die Ohren geschrieben... 🫡 Dir ne schöne Adventszeit! commented 2025-12-02 15:55:45 UTC by BrummsLee ♦22 |
| 175344411 (Comments: 2) | Max-Kritic (Discussed changesets: 960) | Pas de panique. Je vais importer le nouveau cadastre. commented 2025-12-02 15:55:14 UTC by Max-Kritic ♦236 |
| 175301650 (Comments: 2) | geozeisig (Discussed changesets: 330) | Hallo Alex, du hast recht, dass mir die großen P´s negativ aufgefallen sind. Wenn es eine Lösung dafür gäbe, wäre das Thema aus der Welt. Aber ich bin nicht der erste, der street_side=half_on_kerb benutzt hat. |
| 175377636 (Comments: 2) | RandomThighsEnjoyer (Discussed changesets: 6) | OK, das habe ich nicht gewusst. Danke für den Hinweis. commented 2025-12-02 15:44:23 UTC by RandomThighsEnjoyer ♦5 |
| 175406532 (Comments: 1) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 166) | Moin :) ob die einzelne Mühle im SW dazugehört ist tatsächlich eine gute Frage. Hier in der Gegend sind die Parks recht kleinteilig, da kann es schonmal sein, dass zwei getrennte Parks recht nah beieinander stehen. ... commented 2025-12-02 15:44:00 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,723 |
| 175380793 (Comments: 2) | TuAmigoElEditor (Discussed changesets: 60) | la de arriba F19 y la de abajo F43. commented 2025-12-02 15:41:08 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,614 |
| 175380851 (Comments: 1) | rodolfovargas (Discussed changesets: 77) | Hola, hmmm... grassland?? no parece por el lugar rodeado de bosque, quizá en el beni pasando el río beni (derecha). Esto más parece meadow con meadow=pasture porque parece bosque talado para pastoreo.... commented 2025-12-02 15:34:08 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,614 |
| 175336314 (Comments: 1) | Elmerx78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | hola, gracias por mejorar el mapa. Solo tengo una sugerencia, cuando edites (dibujes) edificios rectangulares, hay una opción para rectangulizarlos (colocar esquinas a 90°)... Solo debes seleccionar lo que dibujaste (edificio... commented 2025-12-02 15:28:47 UTC by 5m4u9 ♦1,614 |
| 174885314 (Comments: 2) | Sarah Coenen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Another issue. Don't collect multiple buildings and tag them as 1 building. I had to remove most of your collected buildings. They have to be mapped individually Best regards commented 2025-12-02 15:24:27 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175365420 (Comments: 2) | Waveif (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tak, cała ulica jest oznaczona jako strefa zamieszkania. Już zmieniam commented 2025-12-02 15:24:12 UTC by Waveif ♦1 |
| 175407718 (Comments: 1) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | this chnageset should not be so big, i only changed the river at the top a little bit commented 2025-12-02 15:22:57 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 175015471 (Comments: 1) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 246) | 東湧鄉 Tang-ín-hiong -> Tang-íng-hiong --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175015471 commented 2025-12-02 15:20:09 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,537 |
| 174595798 (Comments: 1) | Sahar Shadi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Sahar Shadi, kann es sein, dass dies eine Dublette von 2048246044 ist? Lt. Mapilary ist rechts von Eingang 31, 33 ein Zigarettenautomat, nicht aber zwischen 29 und 31. commented 2025-12-02 15:14:31 UTC by Steine42 ♦4 |
| 167832038 (Comments: 2) | run'n'ride (Discussed changesets: 17) | Access "All" is incorrect as it's a footpath. I'd amended to detail no to "All", but specify yes to footpath. By detailing yes to All you're opening the use to everything! All should be No, footpath should be Design... commented 2025-12-02 15:06:56 UTC by run'n'ride ♦9 |
| 175399964 (Comments: 1) | Lacetransport (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it ex... commented 2025-12-02 15:03:10 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 166358891 (Comments: 1) | jakub620 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hej, ta jaskinia nie jest zasypana? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5040663 Może lepiej całkiem usunąć oznaczenie otworu? commented 2025-12-02 15:02:16 UTC by kubahahaha ♦415 |
| 174883116 (Comments: 1) | Nick011 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A remark. The most mappings from your hand show rectangular mappings, even when a building is more complex , Follow the rooflines and do not collect multiple buildings. You also did not square the rectangular buil... commented 2025-12-02 14:57:22 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 174319583 (Comments: 5) | Titi72 T (Discussed changesets: 10) | Merci pour votre retour ! En effet, tout à fait d'accord, et c'est tellement évident, que la syntaxe serve pour les gens du grand public et leurs différentes applications. C'est le but. Pour mon inscripti... commented 2025-12-02 14:56:33 UTC by Titi72 T ♦7 |
| 174490366 (Comments: 1) | Zac Raslan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. About buildings with multiple floors, Sidewalls visible See this video. For buildings with a few floors, start watching from position 1 minute. https://youtu.be/Tpi-BTMVo1M Best regards commented 2025-12-02 14:51:24 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175404966 (Comments: 1) | keukenrol (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the information but please do *not* delete objects from the database. This building is still visible on the official GRB basemap and on aerial imagery. If you delete it, there will be a gap on the map and people who look at reference map... commented 2025-12-02 14:50:36 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,663 |
| 175244969 (Comments: 2) | Anrijs Terauds (Discussed changesets: 83) | Sveiki! Ok, vienkārši grafiski tie mazie 150m posmiņu risinājumi izskatījās pēc 'klibas vistas'. https://imgur.com/a/5F5CZaP commented 2025-12-02 14:40:16 UTC by Anrijs Terauds ♦51 |
| 174182312 (Comments: 3) | Floz (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-02 14:37:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175398104 (Comments: 1) | Taksine (Discussed changesets: 37) | thanks for a fix! commented 2025-12-02 14:37:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175000731 (Comments: 2) | lapsly (Discussed changesets: 1) | This node was not in this location, pointed in this direction. Editing is not currently functional on the Deflock app. Node was deleted and replaced. commented 2025-12-02 14:33:12 UTC by lapsly ♦1 |
| 174961895 (Comments: 3) | nickvet419 (Discussed changesets: 78) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-02 14:29:17 UTC by RidecoBrad ♦4 |
| 175404173 (Comments: 1) | CensuraIFLA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted as this building still exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175405154 commented 2025-12-02 14:24:11 UTC by ion_chi ♦45 |
| 175377025 (Comments: 1) | CensuraIFLA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi CensuraIFLA, You changed the whole building. I've reverted this change here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175405191 If you want to add an office for the ALA, it should be a new node commented 2025-12-02 14:23:30 UTC by ion_chi ♦45 |
| 175404968 (Comments: 1) | jwbigdatalab (Discussed changesets: 1) | Buildings need to be mapped from their base, not their roof. So your changes are incorrect, and you need to restore everything to its original state. commented 2025-12-02 14:21:30 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175173269 (Comments: 2) | VJMK (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ok commented 2025-12-02 14:21:15 UTC by VJMK ♦5 |
| 175399904 (Comments: 1) | Create247 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bitte keine schon vorhandenen Informationen doppelt eintragen! Die Adresse und dass es sich um eine Feuerwache handelt, stehen seit längerem am Gebäude, also genau da, wo sie hingehören. Bitte keine vandalisierenden Edits mehr! commented 2025-12-02 14:14:33 UTC by Reclus ♦96 |
| 175369190 (Comments: 3) | CherokeeXJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your reply. I've restored the pond (only) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175404206 commented 2025-12-02 14:03:11 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 175403510 (Comments: 1) | RJonker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-02 14:02:06 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175403712 (Comments: 1) | MyCoach_Personal Training Hilversum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag MyCoach, Paar dingen die niet kloppen, Waarom name:nl=Engels ? Kan die regel weg? .. loc_name?? wellicht beter short_name? Verder ontbreekt de aard van de instelling/bedrijf Wellicht office=? Kijk anders even hier.... commented 2025-12-02 14:01:03 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 173351200 (Comments: 3) | Jožo Schwarz (Discussed changesets: 18) | Aha chápem, ďakujem za vysvetlenie. Môžem to pozrieť ráno keď okolo toho pôjdem. A teda tá cyklotrasa vedľa Dojkrížnej nie je (zatiaľ) R16? Alebo mesto ju za R16 (zatiaľ) nepovažuje alebo ju neo... commented 2025-12-02 13:58:21 UTC by EfreetSK ♦11 |
| 175400721 (Comments: 1) | eggie (Discussed changesets: 367) | Oke.. dan zal het nu correct zijn. Groet.. eggie commented 2025-12-02 13:51:40 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175397267 (Comments: 3) | Anderz Makelaar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Bedankt. Ik weet niet hoe het werkt, we zijn 5 jaar geleden verhuisd, maar ik kwam bijtoeval deze locatievermelding nog tegen. commented 2025-12-02 13:48:11 UTC by Anderz Makelaar ♦1 |
 | 175266949 (Comments: 2) | papagato (Discussed changesets: 1) | I don't understand, sorry commented 2025-12-02 13:47:26 UTC by papagato ♦1 |
| 174977285 (Comments: 1) | radteil (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo radteil, hab grad bei dem Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26705458 building und building:levels angepasst bzw. entfernt. Da scheinen die Angaben durcheinander gekommen zu sein. Falls du die Etagenanzahl noch weißt, trag ... commented 2025-12-02 13:46:52 UTC by söm4324 ♦51 |
| 175403480 (Comments: 2) | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 (Discussed changesets: 180) | （Translated） Rapidで編集しましたが、AI生成のデータセットは一切使っていません。人間ほどの精密さがないからです。 やはり、人類チームの成果を見ることにしましょう。 commented 2025-12-02 13:46:09 UTC by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦565 |
| 170731381 (Comments: 2) | DUGA (Discussed changesets: 37) | Fixed, typo commented 2025-12-02 13:45:19 UTC by DUGA ♦550 |
| 175153696 (Comments: 1) | ant1nn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Buildings ought to be tagged as building=yes instead of landuse=residential Best regards commented 2025-12-02 13:41:30 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175400682 (Comments: 2) | kubahahaha (Discussed changesets: 221) | Jak masz pomsył to śmiało - mi się wydaje że ten teren niczego nie oznacza i można by to zrobić porządnie - czyli wyrysować pola/krzaki/ukształtowanie terenu - i wtedy byłby widać zarys fortów. Jak chcesz to otwórz uw... commented 2025-12-02 13:25:48 UTC by kubahahaha ♦415 |
| 175401289 (Comments: 2) | MHMart (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-02 13:24:13 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175393574 (Comments: 1) | SomeMapper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę. |
| 175401703 (Comments: 1) | Merel de Vries (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Feedback name=Pathé is het geen dat je ziet op de kaart. Daar hoeft geen name:nl=Pathé Tuschinski bij. Die r... commented 2025-12-02 13:19:28 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 174972437 (Comments: 3) | GeneHunt (Discussed changesets: 7) | Yeah, I've no issue at all with the old alignment, since it is well attested and somewhat visible on the ground. Likewise any self-reasoned adjustments to that. For me, the problem would be any reproduction of alignments that can only be obtaine... commented 2025-12-02 13:17:38 UTC by mackerski ♦35 |
| 160443753 (Comments: 1) | JeroenvanderGun (Discussed changesets: 154) | Aanvullende bron: Omroep West (4 maart 2024). Dit is waarom trajectcontrole op A12 bij Den Haag verdwijnt. https://www.omroepwest.nl/nieuws/4812509/dit-is-waarom-trajectcontrole-op-a12-bij-den-haag-verdwijnt commented 2025-12-02 13:07:50 UTC by JeroenvanderGun ♦188 |
| 175356490 (Comments: 1) | Yasmina Bendik (Discussed changesets: 8) | Bonjour, au vu des 2 photo, c'est en double sens mais uniquement pour les automobilistes autorisé https://api.panoramax.xyz/?s=fp;s2;p482b03d4-ba1f-43a8-b7b8-1fd153916b75;c347.00/0.00/30;m17/50.523411/2.632131;vt https://api.panoramax.xy... commented 2025-12-02 13:02:41 UTC by Mathias_ADAV ♦183 |
| 159959606 (Comments: 1) | JeroenvanderGun (Discussed changesets: 154) | Aanvullende bron: Omroep Brabant (26 februari 2024). Trajectcontroles op A58 bij Roosendaal plotseling beëindigd: dit is waarom. https://www.omroepbrabant.nl/nieuws/4426436/trajectcontroles-op-a58-bij-roosendaal-plotseling-beeindigd-di... commented 2025-12-02 13:02:08 UTC by JeroenvanderGun ♦188 |
| 175396662 (Comments: 2) | Evert-Job Doeschate (Discussed changesets: 4) | aangepast als brownfield commented 2025-12-02 12:49:24 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175272266 (Comments: 3) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 246) | 1-15 慶福街 已經不是 hotel 了。 commented 2025-12-02 12:48:26 UTC by jidanni ♦55 |
 | 175400993 (Comments: 1) | ZABuild (Discussed changesets: 2) | sorry the source is local survey, not aerial imagery commented 2025-12-02 12:43:54 UTC by ZABuild ♦2 |
| 175393801 (Comments: 1) | purist787 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Dag purist.. het stond hier al getagd als zijnde buiten functie met disused:highway= MVG eggie commented 2025-12-02 12:42:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 166714428 (Comments: 3) | Walter Mayeku (Discussed changesets: 8) | "if you feel that Bing is old" : outch ! It seems you don't know that almost all imageries have a date (vintage) which allows you to choose the more recent one. With JOSM, go to imagery menu, then choose imagery preferences (I don'... commented 2025-12-02 12:41:05 UTC by Yunan973 ♦81 |
| 175398555 (Comments: 1) | Gijsbert Voskamp || VRU (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dag Gijsbert Wanneer dit niet is toegestaan voor regulier verkeer dan access=no toevoegen icm met emergency=yes Nu gaat het voor regulier verkeer routeren. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-02 12:40:09 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175084086 (Comments: 1) | Picholeiro (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hola, por favor no uses etiquetado addr:* innecesario. De esto se ha hablado en el foro (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/utilidad-del-etiquetado-addr/136217) y se hizo limpieza de etiquetas innecesarias. Por ejemplo aquí (https://... commented 2025-12-02 12:34:41 UTC by kapazao ♦950 |
| 175389851 (Comments: 1) | RandomThighsEnjoyer (Discussed changesets: 6) | Moin, es bedarf auch keiner "only_right_turn". Kreisverkehre sind Einbahnstraßen. Man darf durch die Vorgegebene Fahrtrichtung im Kreis keiner turn restriction. Flo commented 2025-12-02 12:31:44 UTC by flohoff ♦2,414 |
| 175396776 (Comments: 1) | Evert-Job Doeschate (Discussed changesets: 4) | Dag Evert-Job.. Alle begin is moeilijk. De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. Het adres heb ik verwijderd van de gebouwomtrek. Mapse eggie commented 2025-12-02 12:29:35 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 167938525 (Comments: 3) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 246) | 就是說地圖不能隨便。 commented 2025-12-02 12:28:09 UTC by jidanni ♦55 |
| 175397357 (Comments: 2) | Evert-Job Doeschate (Discussed changesets: 4) | reverted by changeset #175400290 Overstekende dakranden e.d. zijn niet de plaats waar het gebouw zich bevindt. Ik heb dit even teruggedraaid. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-02 12:26:41 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175387089 (Comments: 1) | apgosm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello. The road is clearly under the ground and it is clearly private, please do take your time when mapping these things. Regards --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175387089 |
| 175397439 (Comments: 1) | Evert-Job Doeschate (Discussed changesets: 4) | Evert-Job Geef svp concreet aan wat je het aangepast. Medemappers stellen dat op prijs. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-02 12:23:10 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 132002324 (Comments: 2) | FRANCIS NDIRITU (Discussed changesets: 5) | Well Noted @RAytoun commented 2025-12-02 11:57:24 UTC by FRANCIS NDIRITU ♦1 |
| 175376975 (Comments: 1) | BubbleTea888 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for contributing, but please try to stick to a smaller area for each commit! commented 2025-12-02 11:55:25 UTC by f_gonella ♦40 |
| 175018241 (Comments: 2) | 市川ゆり子 (Discussed changesets: 3) | relation:4590587 or node:855287547? what's the problem? it looks like correct... commented 2025-12-02 11:48:29 UTC by 市川ゆり子 ♦1 |
| 175375385 (Comments: 3) | Mike61G (Discussed changesets: 1) | You've obviously not had to unpick situations like this (unjoining multiple area outlines from highways) to find a duplicated section of highway. Dystelegh Road had a duplicated section on top of Chantry Road that I traced and deleted after corr... commented 2025-12-02 11:42:56 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,011 |
| 173752877 (Comments: 1) | DemolitionAlley (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hallo, woher stammt der Name für diesen Weg? Der Weg ist vor Ort nicht beschädigt. Der Name Essiggässchen wird bereits für einen anderen Weg in Gießen genutzt: https://www.sonntag-morgenmagazin.eu/smlokales/essiggaesschen-un... commented 2025-12-02 11:36:41 UTC by KartoGrapHiti ♦87 |
| 171152502 (Comments: 4) | Franckyidf (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bon je vais creuser ... commented 2025-12-02 11:20:10 UTC by michel60 ♦90 |
| 174647733 (Comments: 1) | drivedv (Discussed changesets: 1) | К сожалению данные 2ГИС использовать нельзя commented 2025-12-02 11:12:00 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,190 |
| 164676105 (Comments: 2) | dieterdreist (Discussed changesets: 37) | grazie commented 2025-12-02 11:11:31 UTC by dieterdreist ♦878 |
| 169708096 (Comments: 7) | AwFi (Discussed changesets: 6) | beh non so quale sia covered=yes e neanche dove sia indoor=yes, potrei chiedere a un mio amico, ma poi diventa un sospetto sockpuppet commented 2025-12-02 10:57:26 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦141 |
| 174742725 (Comments: 1) | hoxel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo hoxel, ich habe gerade von diesem Änderungssatz an einigen Gebäuden das roof:orientation korrigiert. Nachdem der Änderungssatz noch recht frisch ist, wollt ich zumindest drauf hinweisen, damit keine weiteren falschen roof:... commented 2025-12-02 10:52:55 UTC by söm4324 ♦51 |
| 169857414 (Comments: 1) | Klingsor78 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Strawberry Line is the name of a route which traverses along this path. There are numerous routes traversing along this path, therefore the name shouldn't be on the way, but in it relation. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/552... commented 2025-12-02 10:47:30 UTC by DaveF ♦1,590 |
| 167782174 (Comments: 3) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 123) | Hi Sir, thank you for fixing it. commented 2025-12-02 10:38:48 UTC by hoizan ♦4 |
| 175240924 (Comments: 1) | Léo_MdP (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour Léo_MdP, Effectivement, le niveau secondaire pour ce type de voie est plutôt adapté. Mais on a à présent un axe principal qui se transforme en section courante en axe secondaire. On pourrait passer Mar... commented 2025-12-02 10:35:31 UTC by Benoît C MdP ♦196 |
| 170791029 (Comments: 1) | JoachimClaeys (Discussed changesets: 5) | Je mag hier wel fietsen. Verandering teruggedraaid. commented 2025-12-02 10:33:32 UTC by JanFi ♦53 |
| 175394078 (Comments: 1) | Steffo45 (Discussed changesets: 1) | nvm commented 2025-12-02 10:33:03 UTC by Steffo45 ♦1 |
| 174618051 (Comments: 1) | AWFCloin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello! You used surface=niet-bestraat2 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1450340877/history Have you maybe meant surface=unpaved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2025-12-02 10:29:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 174977557 (Comments: 1) | AWFCloin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello! You used surface=niet-bestraat2 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452795283/history Have you maybe meant surface=unpaved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2025-12-02 10:29:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 174977284 (Comments: 1) | AWFCloin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello! You used surface=niet-bestraat2 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452793500/history Have you maybe meant surface=unpaved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2025-12-02 10:29:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 171570554 (Comments: 1) | AWFCloin (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello! You used surface=niet-bestraat2 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427647121/history Have you maybe meant surface=unpaved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edite... commented 2025-12-02 10:29:24 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175282355 (Comments: 1) | toorboalex (Discussed changesets: 9) | Здравствуйте, прошу вас объяснить почему вы решили что расстояние между полосами должно быть больше? и перерисовали несколько километ... commented 2025-12-02 10:28:18 UTC by Marker13 ♦7 |
| 169581998 (Comments: 1) | Stephen Hinde (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used surface=paved---- on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256257165/history Have you maybe meant surface=paved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some o... commented 2025-12-02 10:26:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 166626472 (Comments: 1) | KFCmenomonie (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used surface=gravel= on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21474224/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2025-12-02 10:25:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 170050550 (Comments: 1) | mobileGEO (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hallo, warum hast du hier bei mehreren ways segregated=yes + foot=designated gelöscht und durch sidewalk=yes ersetzt? Das sollte inhaltlich mehr oder weniger das gleiche aussagen, nur dass sidewalk für Radwege hier völlig un&uum... commented 2025-12-02 10:23:18 UTC by Luzandro ♦955 |
| 175389628 (Comments: 6) | AlexTopoRO (Discussed changesets: 14) | Pai asa ar trebui sa modifici toata tara ca sa fie corect. Nu cred ca ai timp de asa ceva. :P Normal ca vrem acuratete , insa in sitiatia data e cam complicat. Asa ca , pana se va schimba total in toata tara , ar trebui sa ramana asa. O zi buna. commented 2025-12-02 10:22:30 UTC by rarad74 ♦323 |
| 166100527 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 123) | Hello! You used electrified=now on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96189606/history Have you maybe meant electrified=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2025-12-02 10:21:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175330804 (Comments: 1) | civ2mapper (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo civ2mapper, diese Änderung hat die beiden Relationen "Erlebnis-Zoo Hannover" und "Meyers Hof" zerstört: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=9.77089&lat=52.38119&zoom=17&baselay... commented 2025-12-02 10:21:25 UTC by gscholz ♦2,816 |
| 174889203 (Comments: 1) | Oderradler (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used colour=weiß on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13284348865/history Have you maybe meant colour=white ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some... commented 2025-12-02 10:18:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 174131073 (Comments: 1) | Micha2307 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! You used colour=braun on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13277046876/history Have you maybe meant colour=brown ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2025-12-02 10:18:34 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 174050584 (Comments: 1) | MLz90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used colour=braun on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/832838773/history Have you maybe meant colour=brown ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some object... commented 2025-12-02 10:18:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 156203490 (Comments: 2) | mtmail (Discussed changesets: 51) | That was added in the previous changeset. My changeset only fixed the typo in the tag name. I see you already opened a discussion in the previous changeset, too. commented 2025-12-02 10:10:36 UTC by mtmail ♦161 |
| 174812671 (Comments: 2) | Elena_ausWien (Discussed changesets: 11) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5069431 commented 2025-12-02 10:07:08 UTC by Luzandro ♦955 |
| 175133875 (Comments: 1) | overground2 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bonjour, Un bon outils pour bus relation c'est GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector qui visualise les erreurs des lignes de bus : voici le lien : https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.38842&lat=48.89949&zoom=17&bas... commented 2025-12-02 10:04:02 UTC by michel60 ♦90 |
| 145270656 (Comments: 1) | ginnyTheCat (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292245907/history has maxspeed:source = sign that was added in this edit is it intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed=sign ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asource%3Amaxspeed%3Dsign ... commented 2025-12-02 10:03:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175393853 (Comments: 1) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 246) | 彰化、雲林、嘉義、南投教育單位加education標籤 commented 2025-12-02 09:45:26 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,537 |
| 175392891 (Comments: 2) | Information Security Department (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175393605 commented 2025-12-02 09:39:47 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175380438 (Comments: 1) | HolloWorld (Discussed changesets: 52) | Thank you for correcting `lanes=2` , but please don't remove `passing_places=yes` when adding `lanes=1` commented 2025-12-02 09:39:31 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,677 |
| 175099402 (Comments: 2) | tintou (Discussed changesets: 3) | Bonjour, Oui pour le moment je me concentre sur les récents changements de réseau avec la mise ~à mort~ en concurrence des transports. https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?item=8042&class=1 Merci pour le li... commented 2025-12-02 09:31:04 UTC by tintou ♦2 |
| 175074353 (Comments: 2) | Palgrave Peter (Discussed changesets: 39) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-02 09:17:03 UTC by Palgrave Peter ♦20 |
| X | 139778665 (Comments: 4) | Bender l'importateur (Discussed changesets: 20) | Bonjour, si je prend https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11109170821 les refs sont celle des points de recharge (terme officiel) cad le ou les cables d'une ou des bornes d'une station C'est le E dans la ref qui décrit ce... commented 2025-12-02 09:13:03 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,326 |
| 175387929 (Comments: 1) | Saarrhdh (Discussed changesets: 1) | בבקשה להימנע מהעלאת נקודות אישיות למפה הציבורית https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175392283 commented 2025-12-02 09:12:10 UTC by hatul ♦424 |
| 166919167 (Comments: 1) | Hundehalter (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, 100 sockets type2 ? :) hudge station :) or maybe it's :output=100 kW :) small type in the main tag man_made=charge_point Regards, Marc commented 2025-12-02 09:11:00 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,326 |
| 175386161 (Comments: 5) | S1nus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yep completely seperate to OSM (Actually owned by Meta these days). They do have an app in each of the stores but you can also upload geotagged images (from a phone or action camera etc) via computer and an upload program. The images eventually make... commented 2025-12-02 09:05:44 UTC by tastrax ♦1,178 |
| 174521499 (Comments: 1) | DetailedMaps4Fun (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Please be sure to only map turn restrictions when they are actually signed on the ground. Some of the restrictions you've created look like you just figured that cars shouldn't do that, but this is usually not enough to add a ... commented 2025-12-02 08:52:13 UTC by ZLima12 ♦285 |
| 174978938 (Comments: 1) | GumerGP (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi GumerGP, even as you invested several changesets in this forest area(s), the result still is no valid relation, which is rendered properly on the maps. There are still a lot of self intersecting and overlapping lines: https://tools.geofa... commented 2025-12-02 08:44:38 UTC by gscholz ♦2,816 |
| 175373780 (Comments: 1) | Samwise_Gamgee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please move the node inside a building and add more information (like religion, address,..) to the church. commented 2025-12-02 08:38:39 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175390717 (Comments: 1) | gfcalumi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted SEO vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175390939 commented 2025-12-02 08:37:46 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175386176 (Comments: 1) | Hazard K9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. I have reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-02 08:25:59 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175387419 (Comments: 1) | Jennifer Kim Dermatology (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-02 08:22:14 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175369026 (Comments: 1) | Evie Marsh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Duplicated highway sections removed. commented 2025-12-02 08:01:00 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,011 |
| 174487700 (Comments: 1) | Giovanni Forgione (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hi Giovanni, this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Matese": https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=14.47306&lat=41.39726&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%... commented 2025-12-02 07:53:51 UTC by gscholz ♦2,816 |
| 175306813 (Comments: 1) | notfalltreffpunkt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo notfalltreffpunkt, ich bin mit Deinen Änderungen in Baden-Baden nicht einverstanden. Über official_name und covering wurde ja bereits in anderen Changesets diskutiert. Dein temporary=yes ist eigentlich überflüssig un... commented 2025-12-02 07:44:06 UTC by DD1GJ ♦2,379 |
| 175388296 (Comments: 1) | 느낌이 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175389033 commented 2025-12-02 07:37:09 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175303364 (Comments: 3) | Max Smits (Discussed changesets: 14) | I've corrected it yesterday. commented 2025-12-02 07:36:42 UTC by Dimitar155 ♦750 |
| 175240979 (Comments: 4) | k2101 (Discussed changesets: 50) | Tak, przy kolejnej edycji poprawię. commented 2025-12-02 07:34:56 UTC by k2101 ♦11 |
| 175368901 (Comments: 1) | felix Markillie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your building outline duplicated an existing building, so I've removed it. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-02 07:32:07 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,011 |
| 174794510 (Comments: 4) | Miui Cat (Discussed changesets: 1) | @Miui Cat If you’d like, you’re welcome to join the OSM Indonesia Telegram. There, you can share or discuss anything related to OSM with other local enthusiasts. (https://t.me/osmindonesia) commented 2025-12-02 07:01:29 UTC by adiatmad ♦450 |
| 113457771 (Comments: 1) | dougb0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just an FYI, you could have tagged the former Chickahominy Drive way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59149099) as old_name=Chickahominy Drive and then renamed it to Givens Lane, rather than merging the former Chickahominy Drive way into its adjoin... commented 2025-12-02 06:51:49 UTC by Frank Peng ♦46 |
| 175378419 (Comments: 1) | daniella raffa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see the comment about the other AED commented 2025-12-02 06:51:40 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,011 |
| 175378451 (Comments: 1) | daniella raffa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, If the AED isn't inside where is it? On the wall outside? Then it should be joined to the wall in the correct position and this indicated in a defibrillator:location= tag so folk can find it. Need help just ask. Regards Bernard... commented 2025-12-02 06:50:19 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,011 |
| 155589306 (Comments: 4) | BardafFr (Discussed changesets: 13) | XD commented 2025-12-02 06:42:18 UTC by BardafFr ♦14 |
| 175369627 (Comments: 1) | Howie67 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your new residential area is within an existing mapped residential area, Way: 3707308. So it's not needed, (it wouldn't be tagged as a house anyway). I've removed the area, Way: 1455256230 D... commented 2025-12-02 06:39:30 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,011 |
| 174190025 (Comments: 5) | BardafFr (Discussed changesets: 13) | Oui il me semble qu'ils mettent la trace théorique sur OSM et les panneau ça met un peut plus de temps. Beaucoup sont apparu à la fin de l'été sur Haubourdin commented 2025-12-02 06:16:57 UTC by BardafFr ♦14 |
| 175381454 (Comments: 1) | apgosm (Discussed changesets: 8) | Please don't waste changeset description field for a self-promotion - it's another mappers job to review your changes. commented 2025-12-02 06:12:13 UTC by Sylabowy Kot ♦319 |
| 175385514 (Comments: 1) | simplyfine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19073 commented 2025-12-02 05:34:59 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175379722 (Comments: 2) | Kkkkhwhe (Discussed changesets: 7) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175383594 #vandalism commented 2025-12-02 05:33:36 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,707 |
| 175385594 (Comments: 1) | dfrsfsdaytru (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19072 commented 2025-12-02 05:32:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175385071 (Comments: 1) | No1Cathy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19071 commented 2025-12-02 05:12:12 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175381831 (Comments: 1) | kangyunmook (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175385308 commented 2025-12-02 05:09:02 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175381843 (Comments: 1) | kangyunmook (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19070 commented 2025-12-02 05:08:27 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175382646 (Comments: 1) | dongseoul (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19069 commented 2025-12-02 05:05:37 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175384048 (Comments: 1) | syy1024 (Discussed changesets: 1) | As long as you continue to vandalise the OSM map, yes, we will continue to fix it! Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19068 commented 2025-12-02 05:02:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175381944 (Comments: 1) | 김선구 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19067 commented 2025-12-02 04:59:09 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175384763 (Comments: 2) | 유대희 (Discussed changesets: 3) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19066 commented 2025-12-02 04:54:55 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175380631 (Comments: 1) | 삭제요원 (Discussed changesets: 1) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19065 commented 2025-12-02 04:52:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175382095 (Comments: 2) | Kkkkhwhe (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19064 commented 2025-12-02 04:50:31 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175372511 (Comments: 2) | Filip009 (Discussed changesets: 65) | Okay, tagging I have used was from my memory, so thx for changing it for better one. commented 2025-12-02 04:46:25 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,037 |
| 175384612 (Comments: 1) | 유대희 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175384858 commented 2025-12-02 04:41:51 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175384745 (Comments: 1) | 유대희 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175384831 commented 2025-12-02 04:39:49 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 159217987 (Comments: 2) | dalmond (Discussed changesets: 7) | You are correct this is a typo on my part. I have fixed it properly to culvert commented 2025-12-02 04:10:30 UTC by dalmond ♦6 |
| X | 175156819 (Comments: 3) | hikebikeclimb (Discussed changesets: 4) | Ok, I've marked these trails as informal=yes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175384201 commented 2025-12-02 03:52:27 UTC by ion_chi ♦45 |
| X | 175372825 (Comments: 1) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi. Please make smaller changesets. e.g. edit what you want in Canada, then save them, and only then make edits in other countries or places like Antartica. It makes much easier to check the quality of each changeset. commented 2025-12-02 03:50:40 UTC by muralito ♦2,090 |
| 175379958 (Comments: 1) | Kkkkhwhe (Discussed changesets: 7) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175383572 commented 2025-12-02 02:57:33 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175379970 (Comments: 1) | Kkkkhwhe (Discussed changesets: 7) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175383567 commented 2025-12-02 02:57:08 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175380021 (Comments: 1) | Kkkkhwhe (Discussed changesets: 7) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175383559 commented 2025-12-02 02:56:27 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175381906 (Comments: 1) | Kkkkhwhe (Discussed changesets: 7) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175383555 commented 2025-12-02 02:56:00 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175381989 (Comments: 1) | Kkkkhwhe (Discussed changesets: 7) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175383551 commented 2025-12-02 02:55:35 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 175382182 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 119) | Did I say, "Corrected road direction"? I meant that I re-aligned road geometry based on... Blah, blah, blah, it's too long and verbose to list here. commented 2025-12-02 02:52:05 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦140 |
| 175333356 (Comments: 1) | Kerry Irons (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the fix here, Kerry, I had not noticed this. commented 2025-12-02 02:17:57 UTC by stevea ♦315 |
| 171713070 (Comments: 1) | Matthew Grund (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi, you probably know this already, but be careful about mapping stop lines as stop signs because traffic lights often have stop lines too, I noticed you had some stop signs at the intersection of Morgan Rd and Piper Rd commented 2025-12-02 01:55:46 UTC by jm428 ♦21 |
| 174582975 (Comments: 1) | JuanMon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola Juan Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OSM. Sin embargo, moviste un nodo de un parque de Nicolás de Federmán, y dañaste la geometría. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9451763392 Ten cuida... commented 2025-12-02 01:54:35 UTC by AngocA ♦216 |
| 174887038 (Comments: 1) | phlinsia (Discussed changesets: 1) | 您好，请问“漣澪靈”是否也是您？您添加的很多地名不复存在，应当移步 OpenHistoricalMap 添加，不应当再在 OSM 上出现了。另外，明确已经拆除的村落，也不应当添加到 OSM. 这有违 OSM ... commented 2025-12-02 01:53:53 UTC by hahae ♦14 |
| 173444988 (Comments: 2) | ThePigeonCompany15 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted due to clear vandalism deletion of motorway slip roads commented 2025-12-02 01:25:22 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 175381872 (Comments: 1) | cedaros (Discussed changesets: 30) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Duplikat adresu w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4212948095 https://www.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-12-02 01:21:02 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 173403616 (Comments: 1) | Ayyayo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Can you check your edits here regarding oneway roads? I can see you've removed the roundabout, but the way the roads are set doesn't really make sense as it stands, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139529913. There's no up... commented 2025-12-02 01:17:36 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 175327787 (Comments: 1) | sbodapati (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time with abbreviations. But the rest looks great. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https... commented 2025-12-02 01:16:21 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175374662 (Comments: 2) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | I understand, I will provide better mapping next time. commented 2025-12-02 00:49:27 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 150686794 (Comments: 3) | Jack Boschert (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Venoltar, I am not a local expert, but as TheSwavu mentioned I think the tagging of Whinstanes as place=neighbourhood is consistent with the OSM Wiki definition. Especially in the context of Brisbane where there are commonly known neighbourhood na... commented 2025-12-02 00:48:26 UTC by Jack Boschert ♦7 |
| 174578397 (Comments: 1) | Vasily494 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Вы добавили контакты ручью :) Куда вы их хотели добавить? commented 2025-12-02 00:27:46 UTC by TrickyFoxy ♦1,190 |
| 175380492 (Comments: 2) | Hufkratzer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Oops, this comment was meant for a different change set: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175372511 commented 2025-12-02 00:10:31 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦854 |
| 175323316 (Comments: 2) | Marv8125 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, yes the deletions were intentional, I'm new to this and I might be trying to be to precise. I like how easy it is to get started. Thanks for checking. commented 2025-12-02 00:02:44 UTC by Marv8125 ♦1 |
| 175380035 (Comments: 1) | Łukasz Wasiak (Discussed changesets: 10) | Cześć! Ponawiam apel o niestosowanie aktualnie zdjęć Bing dla Gdańska - używanie tego podkładu stosuje niewielkimi (acz istotnymi przy mikromapowaniu) przesunięciami. commented 2025-12-01 23:45:18 UTC by czebureks ♦138 |
| 175367445 (Comments: 3) | Yukiroshi (Discussed changesets: 25) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995838392 Pozdrawiam! ... commented 2025-12-01 23:45:14 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175366671 (Comments: 11) | Anonim 777 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna.... commented 2025-12-01 23:45:11 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175364875 (Comments: 1) | EinEngener (Discussed changesets: 131) | Das was hier bei einigen Wegen unter dem Schlüssel "name" eingetragen ist, sind keine Namen. Siehe Wiki key:name. Das sind bestenfalls Beschreibungen, also key:descriptions. commented 2025-12-01 23:44:36 UTC by george1201 ♦250 |
| 175376023 (Comments: 1) | Spielroute (Discussed changesets: 5) | Bazı yolların adını "Mersin - Antalya Yolu"'ndan "Antalya - Mersin Yolu"'na çevirmişsiniz. Bu adı taşıyan tüm yolların adını değiştirmemişsiniz. Vaktiniz yoktu diyemeyiz çünkü t... commented 2025-12-01 23:33:12 UTC by HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi ♦176 |
| 165330780 (Comments: 1) | pierre_geovelo (Discussed changesets: 19) | Bonsoir Pierre, Quelle est cette référence que vous indiquez ? Par exemple ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206292015 Est-ce une base publique ? Si oui, il faudra... commented 2025-12-01 23:28:23 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦42 |
 | 175268301 (Comments: 5) | Andreasl01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for the feedback mcliquid! I will make sure to split my changesets more if I make any similar edits in the future. ----- goedegazelle, as ManuelB701 said, having multiple tags for the same thing will make the data harder to re... commented 2025-12-01 23:26:04 UTC by Andreasl01 ♦1 |
| 174826705 (Comments: 3) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 308) | (for completeness - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/b-unicycling/diary/407814 ) Thanks! commented 2025-12-01 23:24:19 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 86937588 (Comments: 3) | SK53 (Discussed changesets: 171) | Thanks - down to 388 now... commented 2025-12-01 23:22:54 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 159296345 (Comments: 2) | YaronS (Discussed changesets: 7) | לפי התוואי של הנחל, אם הוא מתיישב על הנקודות הנכונות אז יש הצלבה בין הנתונים ב־Wikidata (בדרך כלל נקודות לאורך הנחל) לבין התוואי של הנחל שמצויר... commented 2025-12-01 23:20:13 UTC by YaronS ♦7 |
| 173904057 (Comments: 3) | Davide Pastelli (Discussed changesets: 1) | You can't edit the source in the changeset tag but you can explain in a bit more detail here how you did use various sources when making this edit. commented 2025-12-01 23:03:52 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 174343697 (Comments: 3) | mactavishfr (Discussed changesets: 2) | OK - done, thanks commented 2025-12-01 22:58:44 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 175149795 (Comments: 1) | Phoebe lloyd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Phoebe, Many thanks for adding an AED to the map at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13333614301 Is there any chance you could provide a better location description though? I assume that the "bn124ee" is supposed to be t... commented 2025-12-01 22:53:13 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦292 |
| 112867513 (Comments: 1) | Lugiadri1 (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/amenity-school-vs-landuse-school/7406 commented 2025-12-01 22:53:05 UTC by MatthieuMartin ♦94 |
| 174530307 (Comments: 4) | TagaSanPedroAko (Discussed changesets: 327) | Thanks for linking me to that conversation! I'm happy for us in Winnipeg to follow any agreed standard, but I want "the docs" to be updated as well to avoid... honestly to avoid this kind of bickering :P I agree that the name f... commented 2025-12-01 22:50:02 UTC by mf8s003j ♦25 |
| 175294966 (Comments: 1) | Akiera Smith (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi , Could you check the location that you've given to the AED node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13341548901 ? At the moment it's placed inside a house. Is it really located there? Also, could you give a better location descrip... commented 2025-12-01 22:49:03 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦292 |
| 163067294 (Comments: 1) | I-Izzo (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi, there is no footway or sidewalk here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363660984 , and there wasn't either in the past. How did you assess there is one? Sometimes I have the impression people were just adding sidewalks to any road regardles... commented 2025-12-01 22:41:24 UTC by dieterdreist ♦878 |
| 175114505 (Comments: 3) | Simon Sustrans (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-01 22:41:24 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 170901573 (Comments: 2) | MarkusHD (Discussed changesets: 32) | Thanks for the hint. I guess the last time I had a look into the Wiki, it was still recommended to use both tags. commented 2025-12-01 22:38:51 UTC by MarkusHD ♦177 |
| 175378143 (Comments: 2) | Bob Hulst (Discussed changesets: 13) | Bob.. Probeer eens op de changesets te reageren. Zie https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2685347 MVG eggie commented 2025-12-01 22:37:29 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175291027 (Comments: 2) | Sébastien Pi (Discussed changesets: 9) | :) commented 2025-12-01 22:30:30 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦42 |
| 175377732 (Comments: 2) | Bob Hulst (Discussed changesets: 13) | Ik het een barrier=lift_gate op een node gezet verbonden met de weg. Toegang=slagboom verwijderd. Dat doet helemaal niets. emergency=yes toegevoegd. Groet eggie commented 2025-12-01 22:25:54 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 173412161 (Comments: 2) | Seetroll (Discussed changesets: 44) | Reverted the modifications for Parking Oost and Parking West in the Blaarmeersen in Gent. This parking is not a camper site. Checked it myself and there is a traffic sign that campers are only allowed to park there from 9-18h (so no overnight parking... commented 2025-12-01 22:25:09 UTC by ValidDistress ♦12 |
| 49775753 (Comments: 1) | zerpou (Discussed changesets: 50) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4896118923/history : était-il nécessaire de reproduire les fote de la note originale ? ;-) commented 2025-12-01 22:22:22 UTC by trial ♦991 |
| 175377409 (Comments: 2) | Create247 (Discussed changesets: 6) | @Reclus das sieht schwer nach einAccount von Streetview247 0tten24 Nordgork even666 aus commented 2025-12-01 22:20:31 UTC by misterte ♦44 |
| 175367820 (Comments: 2) | pitvvv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. Las ediciones sobre la torre Entel no las entendemos mucho. Le pedimos por favor incorporarse al chat de la comunidad chilena de maperos en Telegram (https://t.me/OSMcl). Ahí podrá despejar todas sus dudas respecto de los tags que... commented 2025-12-01 22:15:05 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175358831 (Comments: 1) | SG86 (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hallo SG86, danke für die Prüfung und Korrektur. Allerdings hast du die Stelle zwar zum PKW-Parkplatz gemacht, jedoch alle Eigenschaften des vormaligen Fahrradparkplatzes beibehalten. So ist weiterhin capacity=30 eingetragen, was fü... commented 2025-12-01 22:12:24 UTC by george1201 ♦250 |
| 175372987 (Comments: 1) | Create247 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bitte keine Beschreibungen als Namen eintragen! commented 2025-12-01 22:07:54 UTC by Reclus ♦96 |
| 174936836 (Comments: 1) | Tigran Asaturjan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Čau, Šeit gribēju pieminēt par ceļu/ielu nosaukumiem. Ievadam, Latvijā ir divi biežāk sastopami nosaukumi - ceļu maršrutu nosaukumi un ielu nosaukumi. Maršruts ir piemēram "Ulbroka - Ogre" ar kodu... commented 2025-12-01 21:55:07 UTC by HellMap ♦767 |
| 175371756 (Comments: 2) | Create247 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bitte Dinge wie „Vorplatz Feuerwehr“ und „Ausfahrt Feuerwehr“ nicht als name taggen. Das ist eine Beschreibung, kein Name. commented 2025-12-01 21:34:39 UTC by Reclus ♦96 |
| 175372589 (Comments: 1) | Create247 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Das war eindeutig keine gute Bearbeitung. Ich habe mich bemüht, das rückgängig zu machen. Die beiden Fahrtrichtugen sind als zwei Straßen gemappt, die selbstverständlich jeweils nur in eine Richtung befahren werden sollten. ... commented 2025-12-01 21:30:47 UTC by Reclus ♦96 |
| 173406962 (Comments: 1) | Pucciotrex30 (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hey! Unfortunately, I noticed that this change is quite incorrect: What you see on the "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" layer is outdated by many years (it is from approximately the year 2014 if I see it correctly) and for this intersect... commented 2025-12-01 21:30:10 UTC by tyr_asd ♦451 |
| 174894205 (Comments: 1) | DuškoAnastas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hvala, evo slucajno i ja naleteo sad na ovu gresku i ispravio jos jedan segment. Nasao sam ovde ime: https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9B%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80_%D0%91%D0%B0%D1%9A%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0 commented 2025-12-01 21:25:59 UTC by Branko Kokanovic ♦337 |
| 175373512 (Comments: 4) | Bartek Dąbrowski (Discussed changesets: 1) | ale dzięki za edycję, zachęcam do innych (choć akurat z przestawania kategorii dróg wte i wewte tak dużo pożytku nie ma - ale są ciekawsze rzeczy do pomapowania) commented 2025-12-01 21:25:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 160187400 (Comments: 10) | Mashin (Discussed changesets: 41) | Generally, in cases like the I-91/CT-159 interchange, I feel that it is better to not change the classification of the connecting road (Meadow Road in this case). The ground truth is that CT-159 is the primary road, and you have to get off onto a sid... commented 2025-12-01 21:21:59 UTC by ZLima12 ♦285 |
| 175335269 (Comments: 1) | m@rio (Discussed changesets: 131) | not a footway... commented 2025-12-01 21:19:49 UTC by Yog Sot ♦368 |
| 175373373 (Comments: 3) | lunamian (Discussed changesets: 6) | hgv:backward=no bus:backward=no toegevoegd. Groet, eggie commented 2025-12-01 21:14:23 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175306572 (Comments: 9) | notfalltreffpunkt (Discussed changesets: 9) | "Dies ist definitiv m. M. nach keine Beschreibung. Darin stecken zwei Informationen, welche m. M. nach auch getrennt zu erfassen sind." Die Eigenschaft wird über amenity erfasst, das Gebiet über den etwas gewöhnungsbed... commented 2025-12-01 21:13:54 UTC by limes11 ♦970 |
| 175376460 (Comments: 1) | Sylv1_Durif (Discussed changesets: 5) | Source: survey commented 2025-12-01 21:13:36 UTC by Sylv1_Durif ♦16 |
| 127635417 (Comments: 1) | _Noahhhh_ (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi! Are you sure that historic=monument is accurate description of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104506426 ? Seems more like tourism=artwork to me commented 2025-12-01 21:11:10 UTC by Self-Perfection ♦171 |
| 174668038 (Comments: 3) | Ajper (Discussed changesets: 12) | Myslím, že expresu to tam nepíše. Zajtra teda pozriem ako je to v Prahe. Aktuálne mi to nepríde ako najlepšie riešenie kvôli reláciám jednotlivých vlakových spojen&ia... commented 2025-12-01 21:10:27 UTC by Filip009 ♦1,037 |
| 175338357 (Comments: 2) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 198) | I've fixed this in changeset #175376236 https://osmcha.org/changesets/175376236 as well as refined the Price's Fork eastbound positioning to better align with reliable imagery and reduce the skew in that direction, as well as using `placeme... commented 2025-12-01 21:08:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦55 |
| 155940975 (Comments: 1) | Martim Pereira Gil (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! I am going to delete this node. It seems to be a mistake. It is located within already existing https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11191111 "Parque Vale do Leça" commented 2025-12-01 20:57:56 UTC by Self-Perfection ♦171 |
| 175326561 (Comments: 3) | osmmapper222 (Discussed changesets: 28) | 👍 commented 2025-12-01 20:56:55 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,447 |
| 175375728 (Comments: 1) | SchrdngrsZombie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich bin mir Unsicher mit der nördlichen Spitze des Rundwanderwegs. Der Wanderweg ist von Oberdielbach Post kommend über den Parkplatz an der Grillhütte vorbei wieder Richtung Süden markiert. (So wie in diesem Changeset eingetragen... commented 2025-12-01 20:56:30 UTC by SchrdngrsZombie ♦1 |
| 175368971 (Comments: 1) | Carlos_Aranda (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Borró toda la demarcación del condominio para agregar un único sitio con un nombre que parece ser no oficial. Saludos commented 2025-12-01 20:52:00 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 175331604 (Comments: 3) | bleuthoot (Discussed changesets: 7) | Beste bleutooth, Je vroeg feedback.. Hier ging het goed, maar als je roundabout gaat taggen op meer rotondes dan gaat het dus fout in de routering. Zie bovenstaand commentaar. :) commented 2025-12-01 20:49:11 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 160020552 (Comments: 2) | I-76 (Discussed changesets: 17) | *time at 4am commented 2025-12-01 20:45:12 UTC by I-76 ♦40 |
| 175371116 (Comments: 1) | Bustte (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hola. Bienvenido a OSM Chile. Gracias por sus ediciones. por favor tener cuidado con los tags que usa en los hamlets que agrega. Por ahora solo usar name= y el tipo de población. Además, por favor no usar nombres descripti... commented 2025-12-01 20:44:56 UTC by felipeeugenio ♦2,630 |
| 173228047 (Comments: 3) | FVanh (Discussed changesets: 3) | Guten Abend, nein, die Straße ist nach aktueller Beschilderung eine Fahrradstraße, die nur für landwirtschaftlichen Verkehr frei ist. Sonst darf da keiner fahren. Ich finde es auch nicht in Ordnung, dass der Straßentyp ge... commented 2025-12-01 20:27:27 UTC by maiwolf ♦16 |
| 165994971 (Comments: 1) | Waldhüter (Discussed changesets: 22) | Warum wurde das Naturschutzgebiet Vogtsberg erst verkleinert und dann ganz gelöscht? Die Schutzgebietverordnung müsste nach wie vor in Kraft sein. commented 2025-12-01 20:22:30 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦79 |
| 175353747 (Comments: 2) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 66) | Tak, masz racje, ciężko mi w niektórych sytuacjach było określić czy dany wariant jest sensownie mapować jeśli jest rzadki więc zacząłem mapować wszystkie tak jak w całym MZKZG. Co innego w PKS Gdynia gdzie się trochę poddałem b... commented 2025-12-01 20:19:14 UTC by stasiu512 ♦205 |
| 175368414 (Comments: 2) | stasiu512 (Discussed changesets: 66) | Czytając definicje wiki, moim zdaniem unclassified pasuje dużo lepiej niż residental, którego się używa w obszarach mieszkalnych, tutaj raczej głównie droga służy jako dojazd do zajezdni czy bazy ZDiZ oraz jako łącznik do dr&... commented 2025-12-01 20:10:16 UTC by stasiu512 ♦205 |
| 162920605 (Comments: 1) | Dubido (Discussed changesets: 1) | Moin! Du hast hier diesen Guidepost https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8454473918 von der S-Bahn Haltestelle aufs Feld geschoben. Wahrscheinlich ein Versehen VG geomaniX commented 2025-12-01 20:04:13 UTC by geomaniX ♦49 |
| 175218639 (Comments: 7) | ubahnverleih (Discussed changesets: 5) | Beeindruckende Auflösung! Die Kamera kann auf jeden Fall etwas mehr als die GoPros, die in Berlin viel unterwegs sind, aber auch nicht viel mehr. Die Bilder machen auf jeden Fall den Eindruck, als könne man z.B. Wegebreiten (u.a. Radwege) q... commented 2025-12-01 19:55:44 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦432 |
| 175373236 (Comments: 2) | lunamian (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ik heb het als bovenstaand aangepast commented 2025-12-01 19:55:14 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175365714 (Comments: 1) | peterjbeer (Discussed changesets: 1) | (I'm just a mapper, not part of OSM) Are you sure that putting street names from findmystreet complies with that site's licence conditions? commented 2025-12-01 19:46:04 UTC by poggie ♦5 |
| 174410156 (Comments: 4) | Bigismall (Discussed changesets: 3) | Okej, dzięki za przybliżenie tematu. Dodałem odpowiednie tagi do tego krótkiego odcinka Balladyny do Cyprysowej. commented 2025-12-01 19:35:07 UTC by czebureks ♦138 |
| 175364055 (Comments: 1) | NAPYPOZYCJA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Google nie jest dozwolonym źródłem danych dla OpenStreetMap z uwagi na prawa autorskie commented 2025-12-01 19:18:25 UTC by Szymson ♦446 |
| 174053142 (Comments: 4) | Hollul (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wunder geschehen ;) Erinnert mich daran, dass ich die "fee"-Parkraumattribute noch aktualisieren muss... commented 2025-12-01 19:15:44 UTC by Supaplex030 ♦432 |
| 174101381 (Comments: 3) | Cavokld (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre retour et pour l'ajout de la ref :) commented 2025-12-01 19:14:56 UTC by LudovicG ♦107 |
| 175368151 (Comments: 1) | Chai17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | и зачем вы alt_name делаете равным name? ознакомьтесь со смыслом этого тега в вики. Откат. commented 2025-12-01 19:14:52 UTC by literan ♦6,895 |
| 175371146 (Comments: 1) | he who knows (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, How have you verified this restaurant? Can you please add their physical address, their website address and/or social media account. Thank you. Happy mapping commented 2025-12-01 19:06:42 UTC by Comino ♦266 |
 | 174196604 (Comments: 1) | boocha34 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi boocha34, I noticed you have been changing ref tags throughout Lesotho to Bxxxx and Cxxxx. This format stands out to me as it doesn’t follow typical highway reference numbering systems like the A routes throughout Lesotho (example: ht... commented 2025-12-01 19:00:00 UTC by aaronq227 ♦21 |
| 175306247 (Comments: 3) | notfalltreffpunkt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi, ja dann bitte weglassen. Dad Minus wird sonst als valider Wert betrachtet und nicht mehr erfasst. Danke dir! commented 2025-12-01 18:56:15 UTC by mcliquid ♦1,987 |
| 175306260 (Comments: 2) | notfalltreffpunkt (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hallo seewäldle, oh ja, oh je. Habe hier völlig übersehen, das es sich um ein Gebäude und nicht um einen Punkt handel. Da hast du völlig recht. Ich nehm das wieder raus. Danke für den Hinweis. Viele Grüsse commented 2025-12-01 18:53:28 UTC by notfalltreffpunkt ♦8 |
| 175026181 (Comments: 2) | Kin Sapalot (Discussed changesets: 8) | Ha, bedankt! Je note verklaart ook precies waarom we onverwacht op een "niet bestaand" pad parallel aan de oude tramlijn terecht kwamen. Enige wat ik zeker wist is dat het het fietspad recht over staken. Het traject heb ik aan de hand v... commented 2025-12-01 18:53:06 UTC by Kin Sapalot ♦38 |
| 175347360 (Comments: 1) | HelfendeHand (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Da hast du dir für den Anfang eines der komplexesten OSM-Themen ausgesucht: conditional restrictions, siehe https://wiki.openst... commented 2025-12-01 18:52:47 UTC by rempshaener ♦1,157 |
| 175368516 (Comments: 2) | granitschädel (Discussed changesets: 15) | Plus, add sources commented 2025-12-01 18:52:42 UTC by Anas masuris ♦149 |
| 175324129 (Comments: 1) | AliKarabulut1956 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Doğan Taşdelen Caddesi ile buluşan Diyap Ağa Caddesinin secondary olma nedeni nedir? 3 şeritli primary olan yolun yine aynı şekilde 3 şeritli devamı değil mi? Ayrıca bulvarın üstündeki yol, kent rehberinde isimsiz. Oranı... commented 2025-12-01 18:42:20 UTC by keyyushi ♦20 |
| 175352947 (Comments: 2) | Anne am See (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hallo Sven, danke für deine Unterstützung und Bearbeitung der Tour. Grüße aus dem Schlaubetal in den Spreewald commented 2025-12-01 18:39:55 UTC by Anne am See ♦3 |
 | 168317861 (Comments: 2) | Erick tamba (Discussed changesets: 258) | i should've asked: any good reason why it has natural scrub and landuse forest? i just thought it was weird, but you might be more correct... commented 2025-12-01 18:36:43 UTC by Joske1020 ♦16 |
| 175370813 (Comments: 1) | Carto_Ferret (Discussed changesets: 43) | Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-07-29 commented 2025-12-01 18:18:02 UTC by Carto_Ferret ♦45 |
| 174618591 (Comments: 3) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 38) | Je m'occuperai durant les prochains jours de retirer tous mes doublons. commented 2025-12-01 18:08:05 UTC by Lisapple ♦54 |
| 175245643 (Comments: 2) | Lisapple (Discussed changesets: 38) | Merci StC. J'avais déjà prévu de corriger les relations modifiées une fois la Flow Vélo complètement mise à jour, mais les parcours du côté d'Angoulême m'a demand&eacu... commented 2025-12-01 18:02:18 UTC by Lisapple ♦54 |
| 174811077 (Comments: 3) | kitsee (Discussed changesets: 14) | I'm sorry for this, we should had communicate a bit more during RFC. It has been discussed on community forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-power-circuits-routing-proposal/128903 You should look at power=line_section as weel,... commented 2025-12-01 18:01:51 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦161 |
| 149785058 (Comments: 2) | jemmimport (Discussed changesets: 5) | I checked that on April 2024, when this building was imported, it did exist in MaRu ETAK dataset. On December 2024 it was removed from there. Currently it's still active in ADS: https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/EE03962033 In ehitisregist... commented 2025-12-01 17:57:06 UTC by dgmapping ♦70 |
| 175292728 (Comments: 1) | BB-plan (Discussed changesets: 27) | Moin! Diese Änderung hat die Knotenpunkt-Route 06-46 "zerlegt". Siehe https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/10974345 Das passiert bei Deinen Änderungen relativ oft, wäre schön, wenn Du das mit Hilfe von kn... commented 2025-12-01 17:42:32 UTC by GerdP ♦2,795 |
| 175364863 (Comments: 1) | NightHawk112 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi :) verstehe ich das richtig, dass die Kaffeemacherei und die Bäckerei geschlossen haben? Der Schuppen, den du bearbeitet hast, wurde abgerissen? Grüße aus Korbach silversurfer83 --- ... commented 2025-12-01 17:37:11 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,723 |
| 171565150 (Comments: 5) | toponomastica_comune_arenzano (Discussed changesets: 42) | It may be more logical not to have any junction=* tag here, and simply oneway=yes commented 2025-12-01 17:33:13 UTC by cquest ♦279 |
| 175369042 (Comments: 1) | finn-hound (Discussed changesets: 7) | *hardly any detail here, i need to correct the buildings first. starting with the second place i found them (the first is nearly fixed) commented 2025-12-01 17:31:12 UTC by finn-hound ♦10 |
| 175354096 (Comments: 3) | xf_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Info! commented 2025-12-01 17:29:59 UTC by coatix ♦6 |
| 175365932 (Comments: 1) | Gijsbert Voskamp || VRU (Discussed changesets: 7) | Dag Gijsbert, Lijkt me oke. Groet, eggie commented 2025-12-01 17:24:48 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 151107942 (Comments: 4) | jbcharron (Discussed changesets: 27) | C'est vrai qu'une page sur le wiki avec les tags a utiliser serait utiles A l'origine, je me suis basé sur cette exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102829319 commented 2025-12-01 17:21:29 UTC by jbcharron ♦147 |
| 175368068 (Comments: 1) | Ebo9 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Comparing to Bing and Esri aerial imagery, it appears that you have moved City Hall from the location both aerial imageries agree is the base of the building, to the outline of the roof of the building, and flattened the round side of the building. ... commented 2025-12-01 17:20:38 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 174636502 (Comments: 3) | PulisakZ (Discussed changesets: 52) | Yeah, looks good now. Thanks @Aleksandar Matejevic in https://osm.org/changeset/174773710 Note is closed. commented 2025-12-01 17:15:37 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦369 |
| 175366594 (Comments: 2) | Ebo9 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes, they expanded the parking lot to accommodate more visitors for the new Aquatics center commented 2025-12-01 17:12:36 UTC by Ebo9 ♦1 |
| 175335851 (Comments: 7) | NoneyaBidness (Discussed changesets: 2) | OSM is all volunteer and if you are not interested in taking on the work to update the trails no worries. But we ask for you not to removed existing work that others before you have done without replacing it with more accurate information. Thi... commented 2025-12-01 17:04:31 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 164215638 (Comments: 3) | ChrissW-R1 (Discussed changesets: 181) | * korrekte commented 2025-12-01 17:02:56 UTC by ChrissW-R1 ♦369 |
| 175354516 (Comments: 3) | j o h o (Discussed changesets: 6) | No problem... OSM kent wel een heel steile leercurve. Er wordt je niet kwalijk genomen. Editor JOSM heeft een betere foutenanalyse en ook beter overzicht. Een aanrader. editor josm stap voor stap https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor... commented 2025-12-01 17:01:45 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175354135 (Comments: 3) | j o h o (Discussed changesets: 6) | Best lastig te doorgronden in het begin. De commentaren op de changesets komen in je reguliere mail. De brichten via PB's komen in je editor binnen. Maar je hebt het door :) Mapse eggie commented 2025-12-01 16:58:53 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175353460 (Comments: 5) | j o h o (Discussed changesets: 6) | Oke... We kennen ook naast quarter wijken het begrip buurten. Die kunnen dan weer onderdeel zijn van een wijk. Ik zag dat een ervaren mapper al eerder de naam verwijderd had van de landuse=residential. Die hoort eigenlijk niet de buurtnaam t... commented 2025-12-01 16:56:58 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175353013 (Comments: 2) | j o h o (Discussed changesets: 6) | Bedankt! commented 2025-12-01 16:36:21 UTC by j o h o ♦4 |
 | 175327166 (Comments: 2) | Oleg_MD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Could you be more specific before accusing of vandalism? What exactly you do not like in my edits? The names in Romanian of villages in the Republic of Moldova? This is the true on the ground, in documents, in written and oral communication, this is ... commented 2025-12-01 16:34:25 UTC by Oleg_MD ♦2 |
| 175305675 (Comments: 4) | Max Smits (Discussed changesets: 14) | OK. I would use a clearer changeset comment, for instance "Added paths and roads to Sultan's Trail hiking route relation" Nederlander? commented 2025-12-01 16:27:47 UTC by rhhs ♦160 |
| 175360157 (Comments: 1) | Corey Wainwright (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure your mapping is correct? Are the apartments now a wood surface foortway? Is there really a footpath between the houses? Has that area now become a new residential area? Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-01 16:23:40 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,011 |
| 140941561 (Comments: 3) | muerkelmann (Discussed changesets: 6) | .. Het lijkt me een tijdelijk iets. Er zal geen maïs staan nu en komt zoiets terug? Maar up to you. 😀 Groet.. eggie commented 2025-12-01 16:18:57 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175266636 (Comments: 1) | Richious (Discussed changesets: 1) | Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen! Az access címke mindenkire vonatkozik, még gyalogosokra is! Az access=destination címkének így nincs is értelme. Ha az utca elején egy mindkét irá... commented 2025-12-01 16:03:23 UTC by infeeeee ♦616 |
| 175155226 (Comments: 4) | abs8_josm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Aight, I have fixed the other one commented 2025-12-01 16:00:19 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,386 |
| 175137510 (Comments: 2) | WanakaLake (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi rarad74, thanks for reaching out!
Unfortunately we generally do not add access=private tagging unless there is ground level imagery with signage, a visible gate in imagery, or verified documentation indicating such. Without that verific... commented 2025-12-01 15:42:06 UTC by WanakaLake ♦6 |
| 175342587 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 51) | Ways were intentionally segmented to support speed reduction zones during long-term track maintenance. Stop time prediction accuracy will be less accurate with these merges. --- Published using OSMCha: ht... commented 2025-12-01 15:40:36 UTC by red_pandas ♦2 |
| 175357212 (Comments: 2) | PulisakZ (Discussed changesets: 52) | No problem. Glad to help. commented 2025-12-01 15:40:02 UTC by PulisakZ ♦49 |
| 175265088 (Comments: 2) | TimRa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Wurde die Einbahnstraße (siehe Foto https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1175429896911177&focus=photo) aufgehoben oder in der Richtung umgekehrt? Wurde das Durchfahrt verboten nach vorne gezogen wie Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/49... commented 2025-12-01 15:35:43 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,447 |
| 174087031 (Comments: 1) | Good4Good (Discussed changesets: 2) | hello. Check out how to map high buildings. https://youtu.be/Tpi-BTMVo1M Best regards commented 2025-12-01 15:28:18 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 174069262 (Comments: 1) | Good4Good (Discussed changesets: 2) | hello. Thanks for mapping. Please map more accurate and square each rectangular building. Don't add a layer to a building to avoid issues. In Ideditor you cannot move highways out of its place, so we (validators) will do that. Best rega... commented 2025-12-01 15:26:34 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175356361 (Comments: 2) | RobotFK (Discussed changesets: 22) | Kein Problem, ist mir auch nur aufgrund der Telefonnummer aufgefallen commented 2025-12-01 15:14:13 UTC by RobotFK ♦25 |
| 175362769 (Comments: 2) | NatasjaGuitjens (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=150983.85&geometry.y=428293.69&zoomlevel=12.31 commented 2025-12-01 15:14:07 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 172935852 (Comments: 1) | cbgilbert (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please solve the issues shown by the Issuetriangle before you upload your mappings. Check this video as well on how to build buildings with a few floors, start watching from 1 minute. https://youtu.be/Tpi-BTMV... commented 2025-12-01 15:09:04 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175358373 (Comments: 1) | cookingtofu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. Info samengevoegd met adresnode. MVG, Eggie Namens de OSM Community commented 2025-12-01 15:06:30 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175316610 (Comments: 2) | Mohamed_Taha (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi ilias_, Thank you for reaching out. I just merged the node 2690020523 with way 263387716, then deleted the node because it was a duplicate amenity (amenity=fuel inside amenity=fuel). Best regards, Mohamed_taha commented 2025-12-01 15:05:35 UTC by Mohamed_Taha ♦17 |
| 175046348 (Comments: 2) | kabelhaai (Discussed changesets: 27) | Okay commented 2025-12-01 15:03:57 UTC by kabelhaai ♦69 |
| 175027710 (Comments: 1) | leobhat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not copy incorrectly mapped buildings to other spots (they are so equally mismapped that I think you copied them). Map more accurately by following the rooflines precisely. Square each rectangular building a... commented 2025-12-01 14:59:21 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 174050275 (Comments: 2) | Антон-1983 (Discussed changesets: 53) | тот же вопрос commented 2025-12-01 14:57:18 UTC by 4004 ♦1,928 |
| 54666658 (Comments: 4) | they (Discussed changesets: 14) | I acknowledge the don’t tag for the renderer and generally agree. But if we were to argue for the use of permit then every road and path in theme parks and national parks would have to be tagged by permit. I appreciate you sharing the history o... commented 2025-12-01 14:42:16 UTC by Zandu ♦128 |
| 175311340 (Comments: 2) | Chrys000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wo der Name steht ist mir auch gar nicht so wichtig. Doch wie ich im Kommentar schieb, fehlt die Hausnummer, hab ich halt bemerkt als ich ich Adresse suchen wollte und man halt Nr. 20 nicht finden kann. commented 2025-12-01 14:38:59 UTC by Chrys000 ♦1 |
| 175268567 (Comments: 1) | TimRa (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hallo Tim, track sind Wald- und Feldwege. Das sagt nichts über den Zustand aus, sondern über die Art der Nutzung. Diese Wege hier diene wohl eher als Zufahrten und sind daher service. Wenn sie unbefestigt sind kannst du das mit surface=u... commented 2025-12-01 14:36:59 UTC by Langlaeufer ♦1,447 |
| 171321881 (Comments: 4) | Der Wilderer (Discussed changesets: 72) | Der Abschnitt zwischen Hollendischer Straße und Heckenweg ist wieder frei. Dafür soll ab Heckenweg in Richtung Ortsausgang gesperrt sein.. Ob das aber noch der Fall ist muß vor Ort Jemand prüfen. Denn die Meldung ist auch schon ... commented 2025-12-01 14:33:34 UTC by Der Wilderer ♦60 |
| 175359584 (Comments: 3) | Gijsbert Voskamp || VRU (Discussed changesets: 7) | Ahh .. Oke... commented 2025-12-01 14:31:44 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 164802526 (Comments: 1) | Papa-Yankee-Bzh (Discussed changesets: 9) | la route `102030867` a été catégorisé en chemin commented 2025-12-01 14:29:46 UTC by vincentsarago ♦1 |
| 174582482 (Comments: 1) | Vasco Jesus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Olá, Obrigada pela edição na TTT. No entanto, reparei que alterou informação que já existia. Poderia, por favor, explicar o motivo dessa alteração? Seria igualmente útil se pudesse partil... commented 2025-12-01 14:24:36 UTC by DiogoBaptista98 ♦207 |
| 175263375 (Comments: 1) | inserteunnombreaqui (Discussed changesets: 3) | Cần lưu ý những vấn đề sau: - Thời Pháp thuộc, một số làng chia thành nhiều giáp/thôn (mà bạn gọi là "phía", nhưng được ghi nhận là c... commented 2025-12-01 14:21:26 UTC by hieuvan ♦24 |
| 175352880 (Comments: 1) | wholesalecomputersupply (Discussed changesets: 1) | Your business is already on the map; please consider updating that object before adding duplicates. Please be aware advertising copy is inappropriate in OSM. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175360436 commented 2025-12-01 14:17:40 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175350275 (Comments: 1) | NightHawk112 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Moin, den changeset verstehe ich nicht. Die Kapellenstraße ist eine Einbahnstraße? Eine echte oder nur eine die an einer Seite mit Zeichen 267 Beschildert ist? Weil jetzt sind da nur abbiegebeschränkungen eingetrage... commented 2025-12-01 14:17:21 UTC by flohoff ♦2,414 |
| 174315307 (Comments: 1) | Jarred Els (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please check this video Mapping buildings with a few floors, start watching from 1 minute. https://youtu.be/Tpi-BTMVo1M commented 2025-12-01 14:12:55 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175151369 (Comments: 1) | 2007Lucas (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, thanks for mapping. Please do not map buildings as a residential area. Buildings Building=yes! Be more accurate and do not connect or cross other objects. Best regards, and keep mapping. Check this out: See this video. For bu... commented 2025-12-01 14:11:08 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175351891 (Comments: 2) | AK_2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, I have reverted your changeset because it added too many duplicates to the live map data with incorrect values. I kept/restored the nodes that appear to be new elements. I'm not sure how you are surveying these locations, bu... commented 2025-12-01 14:07:23 UTC by HellMap ♦767 |
| 174526748 (Comments: 3) | kitsee (Discussed changesets: 14) | Is it written on ground? I thought about this good practice otherwise: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things commented 2025-12-01 14:00:47 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦161 |
| 175356813 (Comments: 1) | R-MEDIA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cześć! Jeżeli w budynku szkoły mieści się klub taekwondo, to należy dodać go jako punkt - w części budynku, w której się znajduje. Zakładam, że chodzi o salę gimnastyczną? commented 2025-12-01 14:00:28 UTC by czebureks ♦138 |
| 174626514 (Comments: 1) | ErikaBraunn (Discussed changesets: 1) | On this task, the high-rise buildings are often incorrectly mapped. You can see both one or more side walls and the roof. The imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more . Often all visible walls and roofs are mapped as 1 buildi... commented 2025-12-01 13:56:50 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 74224311 (Comments: 2) | Mirecnet (Discussed changesets: 139) | Ano, existuje to. Ide o zasypanu priepast - zavrt ktorej poloha je zachatena v literature commented 2025-12-01 13:56:33 UTC by Mirecnet ♦108 |
| 160435646 (Comments: 2) | Carto'Cité (Discussed changesets: 80) | Réponse sur le commentaire https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158984617#c1519300 commented 2025-12-01 13:39:49 UTC by Carto'Cité ♦1,170 |
| 175331070 (Comments: 1) | Kavish Kardile (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please map only required objects. Buildings and highways. Best regards commented 2025-12-01 13:35:21 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 173219362 (Comments: 1) | tabea222 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Please check this video about higher buildings. For buildings with a few floors, start watching from 1 minute. Best regards commented 2025-12-01 13:26:46 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175352769 (Comments: 1) | PeterHrcka (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please check this footage on how to map See this video. For buildings with a few floors, start watching from 1 minute. commented 2025-12-01 13:24:44 UTC by Frans S ♦10,132 |
| 175325984 (Comments: 6) | RobertGW (Discussed changesets: 2) | reverted adding historical names as currently used - for example see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150812648/history - "plac Krakowski" is no longer its name https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175357445 commented 2025-12-01 13:17:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 175356505 (Comments: 1) | shoy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-12-01 13:11:22 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 174406648 (Comments: 4) | lpf452 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 收到了你的建议，谢谢。待全线通车后我会再对其进行一次 survey，届时更新 'name'信息 commented 2025-12-01 13:06:19 UTC by lpf452 ♦5 |
| 174600765 (Comments: 1) | szedar (Discussed changesets: 27) | zerkniesz na https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edycja-numerow-telefonicznych/138759 ? commented 2025-12-01 12:58:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 155386239 (Comments: 3) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 7) | thanks! commented 2025-12-01 12:52:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,790 |
| 108435750 (Comments: 11) | Friendly_Ghost (Discussed changesets: 176) | Why are people this butthurt over a big bbox spanning their country?? commented 2025-12-01 12:51:33 UTC by Sharko_J ♦98 |
| 175349497 (Comments: 13) | hansbokma (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oke Hans. Top! commented 2025-12-01 12:47:51 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 174750057 (Comments: 5) | Lockstar (Discussed changesets: 67) | i see, thanks. should be all correct now, appreciate your help commented 2025-12-01 12:45:24 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦426 |
| 175237557 (Comments: 2) | MartorCZ (Discussed changesets: 21) | report of #mapycom user: Mapa pokazuje w Alei Krakowskiej ograniczenie do 90 km/h w rzeczywistości jest 50km/h. Then i checked it on Streetview. commented 2025-12-01 12:39:19 UTC by MartorCZ ♦15 |
| 174901628 (Comments: 2) | Vest-Agder-museet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thank you for commenting. The (outdoor) museum area cross several public roads and are located in 3 different clusters. I have made some changes to try to give an exact layout of the museum area. Thank you. commented 2025-12-01 12:26:35 UTC by Vest-Agder-museet ♦1 |
| 153415081 (Comments: 2) | bxl-forever (Discussed changesets: 160) | Very true, indeed. But what is the purpose of flagging my changeset as erroneous? What mistake are you reporting here specifically? commented 2025-12-01 12:19:09 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,663 |
| 149218095 (Comments: 1) | teatime456 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi teatime456, an wen hat der Eigentümer das gemeldet? Sprich, bist du von einer Organisation bzw. Firma - dann das zukünftig bitte bekanntgeben. Des weiteren: Gab es auch eine Begründung warum hier angeblich das freie Betretungs... commented 2025-12-01 12:09:42 UTC by PPete2 ♦138 |
| 175352821 (Comments: 3) | eurelien (Discussed changesets: 11) | merci beaucoup commented 2025-12-01 12:02:08 UTC by eurelien ♦8 |
| 175311678 (Comments: 1) | atyndall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, there appears to be an overlap here https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.81914&lat=-31.97845&zoom=15 commented 2025-12-01 12:01:26 UTC by nevw ♦2,087 |
| 43478725 (Comments: 2) | Gummireddybharath (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also, Gujarat is not a city and if we're talking about this company: https://www.indofil.com/contact/india-office then I see no location in Dahej commented 2025-12-01 11:52:44 UTC by aki007 ♦12 |
| 175339959 (Comments: 2) | szkwok (Discussed changesets: 2) | I don't know what you are doing. But you should multi-select by holding [Shift] as usual. commented 2025-12-01 11:51:16 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦2,677 |
| 175353873 (Comments: 1) | j o h o (Discussed changesets: 6) | Beste Dit lijkt me allemaal niet coorect. Iets beschrijven doe je niet met name= Dus geen name=schoolplein De amenity=school hoort eenmalig te worden getagd op het terrein of op de adresnode of evt op het gebouw. Het staat nu 3x op de kaart. <... commented 2025-12-01 11:46:26 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 166999774 (Comments: 4) | gymate (Discussed changesets: 20) | Szuper, köszi szépen az intézkedést! :) Kézzel javítottam is a branchet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175353347 commented 2025-12-01 11:28:59 UTC by gymate ♦39 |
| 175353146 (Comments: 1) | j o h o (Discussed changesets: 6) | De landuse heb ik aangepast naar een doorlopende polygoon en niet meer een los stuk 'inner' multipolygoon. MVG eggie commented 2025-12-01 11:26:50 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 175350303 (Comments: 1) | RW-Airconditioning (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welkom bij OSM. Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode en het verschoven gebouw hersteld. Uw edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175350303 MVG eggie commented 2025-12-01 11:21:02 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 168695631 (Comments: 2) | Aleksander | Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 29) | Cześć, tak. Wprowadziłem zmiany commented 2025-12-01 11:15:23 UTC by Tomek | Yanosik ♦86 |
| 175339622 (Comments: 1) | AgusQui (Discussed changesets: 200) | que cambios hiciste en esas lineas? commented 2025-12-01 11:11:55 UTC by i2004 ♦169 |
| 175343935 (Comments: 1) | Vicolapatat (Discussed changesets: 7) | Les écoles sont cartographiées individuellement au sein de la zone, cette modification créée donc un double codage. Je vais annuler. commented 2025-12-01 10:56:24 UTC by Ltrlg ♦95 |
| 171645721 (Comments: 2) | SemYakimov (Discussed changesets: 9) | Добрый день! Был там в начале сентября. После дождей на тропах было много воды, в том числе и южнее Трёх Батьев. Сложно оценить, всегда там ... commented 2025-12-01 10:52:38 UTC by SemYakimov ♦14 |
| 175350787 (Comments: 2) | Wooshness (Discussed changesets: 1) | Pad met routerelaties hersteld https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175351709 commented 2025-12-01 10:46:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,524 |
| 175240903 (Comments: 2) | NdwMan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hallo NdwMan, als Namen erfassen wir nur Eigennamen. Siehe hierzu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen Viele Grüße Michael commented 2025-12-01 10:46:34 UTC by Nakaner ♦3,170 |
| 160584008 (Comments: 2) | joooostbrnd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Beschreibung und Lage des AED passen nicht zusammen. Bitte überprüfen commented 2025-12-01 10:30:35 UTC by Markus366 ♦190 |
| 85730266 (Comments: 2) | Schramme (Discussed changesets: 41) | Ich hab mir beim letzten Vorbeikommen ein Foto gemacht. Das Schild scheint mal geändert worden zu sein: yes @ (Mo-Fr 18:30-10:00,Sa 18:30-Mo 10:00) Ich hab's in OSM auch geändert. Danke für's aufmersam machen. commented 2025-12-01 10:30:02 UTC by Schramme ♦34 |
| 175277031 (Comments: 1) | motogs (Discussed changesets: 13) | In the sources I should have included BHF’s ‘The Circuit’ database (but only for the UUID of the AED - as permitted by BHF) commented 2025-12-01 10:24:53 UTC by motogs ♦28 |
| 175349314 (Comments: 1) | Weronika Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 5) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje: Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulic... commented 2025-12-01 10:11:17 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175285003 (Comments: 13) | Yunkers (Discussed changesets: 105) | Od razy mówię, że ten trunk wycofam. Chyba, że przeprowadzisz dyskusję na forum i chcesz to rozwiązać demokratycznie, bo na argumenty zawsze przegrasz w tej sytuacji. commented 2025-12-01 10:06:19 UTC by Yunkers ♦402 |
| 174540987 (Comments: 1) | gonein60sec (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. Please visit India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). You can add full address details on tags. Take care not to edit other entities like GBA, w... commented 2025-12-01 09:58:16 UTC by arjunaraoc ♦600 |
| 167754618 (Comments: 1) | PakitOliva (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola, por favor infórmate bien sobre la forma de editar líneas eléctricas y evita hacerlo si no lo tienes claro. Editarlas con etiquetado incorrecto y no completarlas correctamente genera problemas en el mapa y es difícil ... commented 2025-12-01 09:56:58 UTC by kapazao ♦950 |
| X | 175347233 (Comments: 1) | danill2001 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Why did you include a random node in the US along with your other changes in Russia? commented 2025-12-01 09:53:57 UTC by Maplev ♦12 |
| 175345767 (Comments: 1) | adas (Discussed changesets: 75) | Zastosuj się, proszę, do obowiązujących w społeczności OSM zasad nazywania zestawów zmian: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-01 09:52:58 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦694 |
| 175348239 (Comments: 1) | bjnk954 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Znów nie stosujesz się do obowiązujących w społeczności OSM zasad nazywania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian commented 2025-12-01 09:50:15 UTC by AndyB_66 ♦694 |
| 131797265 (Comments: 2) | hu9o (Discussed changesets: 16) | Yes it was a typo, thanks for the edit commented 2025-12-01 09:43:52 UTC by hu9o ♦85 |
| 175206387 (Comments: 3) | solcarlus5 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Bonjour, Je me base sur le consensus en France (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Cartographie_des_routes_en_France) et à l'international (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Highway:International_equivalence). Le type de highway ... commented 2025-12-01 09:39:41 UTC by divaddivag ♦127 |
| 173136516 (Comments: 1) | droopy66 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour ! Les panneaux indicateurs routiers peuvent être cartographiés avec traffic_sign=destination Le wiki indique que les tags tourism=information + information=guidepost sont quant à eux destinés aux panne... commented 2025-12-01 09:36:39 UTC by cquest ♦279 |
| 174735559 (Comments: 3) | kdom (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ok, merci pour l'info Attention, toutes les données du géoportail ne peuvent pas être utilisé pour contribuer à osm. Pour confirmer, vous pouvez utiliser le calque BDTopo dans l'éditeur ou rega... commented 2025-12-01 09:35:20 UTC by jbcharron ♦147 |
| 168078513 (Comments: 5) | VicVal (Discussed changesets: 8) | @VicVal Vil denne side være en løsning for jeres historik: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ commented 2025-12-01 09:33:25 UTC by b-holdet ♦337 |
| 175197290 (Comments: 3) | solcarlus5 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Merci pour votre retour. Je vous rassure je ne suis pas le gardien du temple ni doit décider des choix d'édition des autres contributeurs. Je m'excuse si cela a pu être interprété ainsi. Pour ce type d'... commented 2025-12-01 09:33:05 UTC by divaddivag ♦127 |
| 159765552 (Comments: 2) | Bierphysik (Discussed changesets: 20) | danke 🤦♂️ commented 2025-12-01 09:28:08 UTC by Bierphysik ♦93 |
| 175220587 (Comments: 5) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 73) | Oh, and, as per https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5070064 , we still need someone to go look at how the building is like because it's covered in scaffolding, but for now I am quite hopeful ref=H is entirely unaffected. commented 2025-12-01 09:15:16 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦69 |
| 175113596 (Comments: 3) | Priscilla Kapolo (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi You remove the local post office in "志學". I should be in that location according to post office website You can just adjust the building outline, not removing the whole poi from the map. --- ... commented 2025-12-01 09:09:19 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,537 |
| 174996846 (Comments: 1) | ozjustbc (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1450938379. Did you mean fieldcomplex instead of feildcomplex? commented 2025-12-01 09:05:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175346545 (Comments: 1) | Joshwa_D (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for mapping Joshwa! You can square the sides of buildings easily with the Q button if you have clicked on the building outline. Thanks again commented 2025-12-01 09:03:18 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
| 175345174 (Comments: 3) | Michelle Wang MPIA (Discussed changesets: 3) | Building looks much better now :) commented 2025-12-01 09:03:16 UTC by nevw ♦2,087 |
| 175346559 (Comments: 1) | Purva R (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice work Purva R ! Really well mapped commented 2025-12-01 08:59:51 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
| 175346583 (Comments: 1) | Michelle Wang MPIA (Discussed changesets: 3) | Lovely edits Michelle. With that track, you could also add the Access tag of "Private". That stops Bing Map users driving up the driveway because their car told them to! Good Luck! commented 2025-12-01 08:56:36 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
| 175196896 (Comments: 1) | Fergusolooney (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Fergusolooney, I don't really understand this change in bus station name that you did. Can you please explain. It looks like an error to me, but maybe I miss something. Regards, MaliMrav commented 2025-12-01 08:52:38 UTC by MaliMrav ♦63 |
| 171374663 (Comments: 4) | Lumor2020 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Habe die Nummern in ref geschoben https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175346267 commented 2025-12-01 08:50:26 UTC by ayxis ♦60 |
| 171399637 (Comments: 13) | Lumor2020 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Habe die Nummern in ref geschoben https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175346267 commented 2025-12-01 08:50:19 UTC by ayxis ♦60 |
| 175305414 (Comments: 1) | Shrokops (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! What is the mean of the tag Coût=15000? What type of business is this node? commented 2025-12-01 08:50:17 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175346267 (Comments: 1) | ayxis (Discussed changesets: 41) | siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bezirksteile-in-munchen-mit-name/138394 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171399637 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171374663 commented 2025-12-01 08:49:50 UTC by ayxis ♦60 |
| 174066113 (Comments: 1) | Finnbarr (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hei, kokonaisten asuinalueiden merkitseminen puutarhaksi on poikkeuksellista, näitä on nyt Suomessa lähinnä tässä muokkaamassasi Laajasalossa. Mielestäni garden:type=residential'eita kartoittaessa tulisi alueen... commented 2025-12-01 08:49:02 UTC by lankapuhelin ♦71 |
 | 175322357 (Comments: 1) | KarenReg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for editing in Lusaka/Zambia. While some of the roads you have re tagged as residential run through residential areas, such as Teagles Road, they are probably more accurately tagged as unclassified as they are more like 'connector... commented 2025-12-01 08:47:51 UTC by ftcat ♦210 |
| 175346408 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 404) | wrong comment: change zh-hant to name:zh-hant commented 2025-12-01 08:44:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175299149 (Comments: 1) | 漣澪靈 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Please check my correction. Did you mean name:zh-hant instead of zh-hant? See https://www.osm.org/node/13295826048, https://www.osm.org/node/13295830435, https://www.osm.org/node/13295886221. commented 2025-12-01 08:42:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175346276 (Comments: 1) | Yasmina Bendik (Discussed changesets: 8) | *ERRATUM titre : Zone 30 commented 2025-12-01 08:41:38 UTC by Yasmina Bendik ♦3 |
| 175345911 (Comments: 1) | Jennifer Tsui (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Jennifer - Thanks for mapping these. Where you have added an area for building, dam or similar, you don't need to add the name as "building". If the building had a name like "CBC House" then you would add it. Great mapping... commented 2025-12-01 08:40:24 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
| 175161334 (Comments: 2) | Christian_Z (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ich frag mich, ob das grad der Knoten der Fakultät werden soll, von denen es in Unitobler ja drei hat: https://osm.li/2ge commented 2025-12-01 08:39:21 UTC by habi ♦1,976 |
| 175264972 (Comments: 2) | RIL91 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Danke für die Rückmeldung und Korrektur. commented 2025-12-01 08:29:37 UTC by RIL91 ♦5 |
| 175082756 (Comments: 1) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 7) | Names like "Gussew" are actually regular and common transcriptions of current place names, not wrong names, and are also used as German Wikipedia article titles[1]. For old German-language names "old_name:de" tag was already used.... commented 2025-12-01 08:20:36 UTC by Pikse ♦213 |
| 175345230 (Comments: 1) | Michelle Wang MPIA (Discussed changesets: 3) | Just another heads up is that you can do more than one building per edit but don't do too many at a time. With the shed, try clicking on it and pressing "R" to rotate the building outline to match. Excellent stuff. commented 2025-12-01 08:14:56 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
| 175344910 (Comments: 1) | gersc2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:s... commented 2025-12-01 08:11:07 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 175118018 (Comments: 1) | KikeTM (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hola compañero mapeador, ¿vas a actualizar todas las carreteras sin etiquetas en una fecha posterior? commented 2025-12-01 08:09:13 UTC by Sandal man ♦398 |
| 175344710 (Comments: 1) | dezzalim (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Deszzalim, nice mapping. There is another shed there. You can add more than one item per edit but a fantastic start on this project commented 2025-12-01 08:05:52 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
| 175311513 (Comments: 1) | Kejen1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Several duplicated highways removed commented 2025-12-01 08:01:04 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,011 |
| 175344614 (Comments: 1) | Weronika Yanosik (Discussed changesets: 5) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-12-01 08:00:54 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| 151533464 (Comments: 3) | aleixstw (Discussed changesets: 13) | btw noticed another thingy - that most of those buildings and roads there are very skewed in terms of imagery, you have to use offset around 6.13, 4.46 to make it look correct there. but then basically all the town is incorrect, which is more or les... commented 2025-12-01 07:55:21 UTC by dpolovinkin ♦357 |
| 175344205 (Comments: 1) | grindvis (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hoi.. Tip.. format phone is +31 in osm voor Nederland. Mvg eggie commented 2025-12-01 07:54:15 UTC by eggie ♦42,728 |
| 174636189 (Comments: 4) | wavewings (Discussed changesets: 5) | I was able to confirm the name so I've now added it back https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175344158 commented 2025-12-01 07:37:10 UTC by wavewings ♦5 |
| 175340347 (Comments: 1) | companyclean (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-01 07:34:22 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175343747 (Comments: 1) | gersc2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje: Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli ad... commented 2025-12-01 07:30:51 UTC by NorthCrab_upload ♦7,933 |
| X | 175340768 (Comments: 1) | Steve Pizzati (Discussed changesets: 1) | Gday Steve, I hope you are good. When doing edits, try and just edit in a single country, preferably state or local area. It makes it easier for local validators to review changesets. Keep on keeping the rubber side down. Ewen commented 2025-12-01 07:29:51 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦417 |
| 175341939 (Comments: 1) | seherna83wvm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-01 07:26:53 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 175343720 (Comments: 1) | Dantine (Discussed changesets: 5) | Need to also consider upping the road classification of Helensvale Road from tertiary to secondary/primary given it's greater importance. Council classifies it as 'sub-arterial' in their road hierarchy. commented 2025-12-01 07:23:40 UTC by Dantine ♦7 |
| 175343258 (Comments: 1) | Bill Marshalls (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5589600698 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-12-01 07:20:24 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,423 |
| 174149989 (Comments: 1) | jorafa051194 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hola, he visto que has estado haciendo bastantes ediciones por la zona de Paterna y como usuario nuevo has cometido algunos errores que quería comentarte. Primero en los conjuntos de cambios se debe describir un resumen de los cambios r... commented 2025-12-01 07:06:02 UTC by kapazao ♦950 |
| 175093713 (Comments: 3) | SurlyRider (Discussed changesets: 6) | bei der WvS-Straße sind die Fahrtrichtungen jeweils als Einbahnstraße erfasst. diese Einbahnstraßen sind für den Radverkehr in Gegenrichtung freigegeben gewesen. Das ist nicht korrekt. Auf der Fahrbahn darf ich mit dem Rad nich... commented 2025-12-01 07:03:47 UTC by SurlyRider ♦10 |
| 170861050 (Comments: 1) | Supaplex (Discussed changesets: 246) | 您好，桥梁名称请在相应name, name:en等字段前增加bridge:前缀，请勿在name, name:en等字段填写除了铁路线名以外的名称 commented 2025-12-01 07:02:26 UTC by DDD丶Samuel ♦14 |
| 175336524 (Comments: 3) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 12) | Thanks! Sorry I started making some changes but then noticed you got some so I abandoned my edits so we don't collide. Thanks again for taking care of it all! commented 2025-12-01 06:47:31 UTC by gpserror ♦227 |
| 175339930 (Comments: 2) | 한국지역난방공사 총무부 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175341714 commented 2025-12-01 06:02:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175339913 (Comments: 1) | 한국지역난방공사 총무부 (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - improper deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175341714 commented 2025-12-01 06:02:22 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 161303727 (Comments: 1) | user_8y978a (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ciao user_8y978a, quale è fonte di questo nome? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213010049 Questo è "semplice" parco pubblico senza nome, che io sappia. Nessuno parco per cani. https://api.panoramax.xyz/?s=fm;s2... commented 2025-12-01 05:59:37 UTC by Đuro Jiří ♦325 |
| 167823842 (Comments: 2) | Blaues Licht (Discussed changesets: 1) | Da hast du Recht. Das habe ich bei dem Anpassungen nach der Baustelle übersehen. Ich habe es korrigiert. commented 2025-12-01 05:53:58 UTC by Blaues Licht ♦1 |
| 167958442 (Comments: 3) | Sigo (Discussed changesets: 11) | Bonjour, Merci pour votre rapide retour et vos actions :) commented 2025-12-01 05:50:06 UTC by LudovicG ♦107 |
| X | 175320102 (Comments: 2) | Serpico (Discussed changesets: 9) | effectivement, merci d'avoir attiré mon attention ,en particulier sur la taille, j'y serais attentif lors de mes futures contributions commented 2025-12-01 05:37:03 UTC by Serpico ♦5 |
| 175314461 (Comments: 2) | Jens Korth at airport-information dot com (Discussed changesets: 5) | Our wiki has more info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon commented 2025-12-01 05:03:34 UTC by nevw ♦2,087 |
| 175337438 (Comments: 1) | pussreboots (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👋 Hi pussreboots, thank you very much for your contribution! Just a heads up, when working with buildings and other often square-like objects, please square the objects. You can use "Q" on your keyboard (or right click ->... commented 2025-12-01 04:51:36 UTC by maxwellward ♦5 |
| 175337909 (Comments: 1) | 한국지역난방공사 총무부 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175339222 commented 2025-12-01 03:40:54 UTC by KennyDap ♦43 |
| 162612850 (Comments: 1) | C3322 (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - mapping military facilities in a war zone https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175338654 commented 2025-12-01 03:05:50 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175148691 (Comments: 2) | 2007Lucas (Discussed changesets: 5) | 另外仁愛醫院也降編為臺北市聯合醫院仁愛院區了，所以名稱會是仁愛院區，非仁愛醫院 commented 2025-12-01 03:00:26 UTC by Supaplex ♦10,537 |
| 175116105 (Comments: 1) | MFlamm (Discussed changesets: 14) | FYI the tag cycleway=opposite is not recommended https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite commented 2025-12-01 02:46:12 UTC by kabelhaai ♦69 |
| 175294276 (Comments: 1) | Kirchturmfalke (Discussed changesets: 1) | Danke für die Umlegung der Relationen. Vom Bussteig 4 fährt auch die 430. Vom Bussteig 3 die 405 und 409. Siehe meine Aufzeichnung auf Mapillary: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1324382132773618 commented 2025-12-01 02:44:36 UTC by Oderradler ♦3 |
| 173076679 (Comments: 1) | DaAlx (Discussed changesets: 2) | FYI the tag cycleway=opposite is not recommended see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite commented 2025-12-01 02:44:22 UTC by kabelhaai ♦69 |
| 175337722 (Comments: 1) | jhawken (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Please do not type addresses directly on shops, that causes unwanted duplicates (especially here because what you typed mismatched the official spelling). We fixed your edit. commented 2025-12-01 02:36:34 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,663 |
| 175309780 (Comments: 1) | Arjen Mentens (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ter info: indien een POI zich al in een gebouw bevindt waarin al een adres op staat, dan moet je dit adres niet herhalen op de POI zelf. Dit wordt namelijk al automatisch gevonden. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175325836 commented 2025-12-01 02:14:10 UTC by kabelhaai ♦69 |
| 175336746 (Comments: 1) | RoseBTCmap (Discussed changesets: 1) | this is either completely wrong or its position is very incorrect as the Outback Steakhouse that this was placed inside of seemingly still exists based on its website and I have seen it open somewhat recently. https://locations.outback.com/florida... commented 2025-12-01 02:13:33 UTC by Udarian ♦537 |