| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53052369 by ChrissW-R1 | 1 | 2017-10-18 21:00:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5024812100 isn't just drive-by spam? Also the equivalent node in LA? The London address looks fake for a couple of reasons - it's in Denmark Street, which is basically musical instrument shops and a few bars (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wik... |
| 2 | 2017-10-18 21:12:19 UTC | ChrissW-R1 | Yes, I had looked this address at Google Street View and can't see something about a shop like this. I think it could be only an online shop.But I don't want to remove it. Who knows, it could exist... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-18 23:21:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you think any of these might be valid, maybe try and contact the previous mappers? | |
| 48258464 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-04-29 17:50:30 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 47946345, 47947047, 47947482, 47978416, 47980692, 48002126. |
| 2 | 2017-10-18 07:45:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, sorry to say there's a small anomaly at, Way: 184967148 a stream tagged as a bridge crossing Way: 488314032 a track tagged as a bridge. Ther's also a short section of duplicated track.As I see you're doing several reverts I thought it best to let you know this problem.Regards Bernard | |
| 3 | 2017-10-18 10:22:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Re http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184967148 , if you're familiar with the area then by all means fix it. If not, it'll clearly show up as a QA issue and someone who is familiar with the area will be able to fix it.Unfortunately I haven't been walking that side of Keswick (other than just around... | |
| 52970975 by velmyshanovnyi | 1 | 2017-10-16 07:51:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You still are not using meaningful changeset comments. We know what "Hydrology" means, but it does not explain the process you are using.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2017-10-16 21:34:55 UTC | velmyshanovnyi | What would you write for this set?I have no imagination | |
| 3 | 2017-10-17 06:37:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'd explain the process that you're going through to add the data. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments has some ideas. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-17 18:59:56 UTC | velmyshanovnyi | thnx | |
| 52145782 by carlosz22 | 1 | 2017-09-19 04:22:03 UTC | SafwatHalaby | Those image and "dataset" links are very strange. Mind explaining? |
| 2 | 2017-09-19 04:27:08 UTC | SafwatHalaby | It appears those lead to sensor data. Perhaps the "image" tag should be renamed to "website" or some new tag. "image" is for images. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-12 06:24:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | @SafwatHalaby for info since there was no response here (possibly de to broken email) I sent a "message that has to be read" http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1564 . | |
| 4 | 2017-10-14 14:48:32 UTC | carlosz22 | Hello.This is not an import. We are working on a network of photometers and we are including them like any other meteorology station, it's a station for monitoring the sky brightness.I used the tag image for image of the measures, maybe this is not correct, but I didn't find any other tag more e... | |
| 5 | 2017-10-14 14:49:18 UTC | carlosz22 | And sorry, I don't respond to the previous messages because I din't see them. | |
| 6 | 2017-10-17 06:18:40 UTC | SafwatHalaby | I think you should be using "website" rather than "image". But let's wait for @SomeoneElse's reply. He knows better. | |
| 7 | 2017-10-17 06:33:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | @carlosz22 it still looks like an import to me - talking about the tags to be used before adding a large number of objects to OSM is one of the main steps set out at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines . I'd suggest that you follow those now (even if the discussion is after the in... | |
| 52744292 by ڕاستی | 1 | 2017-10-16 14:16:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | For information, I've re-added a lot of the language codes that you had previously removed from Lirkuk. If there are any problems, please contact data@osmfoundation.org .This has been mentioned before, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1459 . |
| 52817169 by johanemilsson | 1 | 2017-10-15 10:01:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello johanemilsson,This is geographically a very large change with no comment explaining what was changed. Can you explain what you were changing and why?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-16 12:52:36 UTC | johanemilsson | Hi Andy,It sure is a large area. I forgot to add comment but it should be some like "Embassies missing representing country #maproulette-2791". Feel free to pitch in if you have any interest in foreign missions and some spare time :)/Johan | |
| 3 | 2017-10-16 13:12:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that all the locations are correct? Many in the list seem to have been created by MAPS.ME users, who tend to use lesser-used tags (such as "embassy") to create personal markers. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4697076691/history in particular seems odd; it was previously t... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-16 13:25:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info:https://github.com/maproulette/maproulette2/issues/348 | |
| 5 | 2017-10-17 06:24:40 UTC | johanemilsson | Thanks for raising this issue! Will need to review my latest embassy edits. | |
| 52968804 by Rexma423 | 1 | 2017-10-15 23:34:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Rexma423, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!The change that you've made here covers quite a large geographical area and that makes it difficult for people in one area to see just the things that affect them in their area. If you put different edits in different areas in different changesets then... |
| 2 | 2017-10-15 23:43:42 UTC | Rexma423 | Sorry about that, next time i'll be more specific. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-16 07:28:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks | |
| 52973037 by Salaamlogari | 1 | 2017-10-16 07:27:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Salaamlogari,I think that this got saved accidentally - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532878906/history just seems like a doodle.I've removed it.Best Regards,Andy |
| 52968756 by velmyshanovnyi | 1 | 2017-10-15 23:23:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello velmyshanovnyi,All of your recent changesets just have the changeset comment "#hidrology". Can you please start to use sensible changeset comments that describe the change that you made and what the source was (it doesn't appear to be Bing here, despite the tag). |
| 2 | 2017-10-16 00:07:19 UTC | velmyshanovnyi | server_api = bingserver_name = Bingserver_url = http://dev.virtualearth.net/REST/v1/Imagery/Metadata/Aerial?include=ImageryProviders&output=xml&key=Arzdiw4nlOJzRwOz__qailc8NiR31Tt51dN2D7cm57NrnceZnCpgOkmJhNpGoppU | |
| 3 | 2017-10-16 00:08:12 UTC | velmyshanovnyi | Copyright © 2017 Microsoft and its suppliers. All rights reserved. This API cannot be accessed and the content and any results may not be used, reproduced or transmitted in any manner without express written permission from Microsoft Corporation. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-16 00:12:28 UTC | velmyshanovnyi | HelloI'm waiting for your apologies for blocking.... )))) | |
| 5 | 2017-10-16 00:16:04 UTC | velmyshanovnyi | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HydrologyHydrology subdivides into surface water hydrology, groundwater hydrology (hydrogeology), and marine hydrology. Domains of hydrology include hydrometeorology, surface hydrology, hydrogeology, drainage-basin management and water quality, where water plays the c... | |
| 6 | 2017-10-16 08:13:05 UTC | Nakaner | The wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments explains what good changeset comments are and you are expected to use good changeset comments. | |
| 52967290 by Yusefkaramanli | 1 | 2017-10-15 22:16:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | This change, unlike the others by this account, actually seems plausible! |
| 52956974 by ChrissW-R1 | 1 | 2017-10-15 18:43:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Whilst I can understand why you've merged the wikipedia links of the NK region node into one, are you sure that (a) the content of the pages was actually the same and (b) the content of the one that you're now linking to (the AZ one) is neutral enough to be acceptable to the locals, who see themselv... |
| 46947543 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-10-15 12:14:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | It would help if you used English instead of saying things like "for auto-detected data problems, like disambigs and lists". Not everyone is familiar with wikibabble. |
| 30115838 by erichardwick36 | 1 | 2017-10-15 12:11:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Should http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=98200263 be called the River Severn still? It had its name removed in this changeset - just wondering why.Best Regards,Andy |
| 52917545 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-10-14 12:40:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Which was the duplicate way that got removed here? |
| 52566221 by Jay May | 1 | 2017-10-02 17:25:24 UTC | yaugenka | Jay May, my changes did not delete the previous data, whereas your reverting messed everthing up! There are now duplicate data. If you are doing reverting, do it wisely! |
| 2 | 2017-10-02 17:51:43 UTC | yaugenka | I do not mind if you put the previous "name:* values but please be kind to correct the mess and restore the new values I added. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-03 16:48:12 UTC | Jay May | The values you added were wrong. The only thing called „Hudahaj” is the train station. Those villages are called „Stancyja Hudahaj” and „Maly Hudahaj” respectively. Why should I restore wrong data if I’ve been there a couple of times, the latest of which was... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-03 17:33:39 UTC | yaugenka | Read this document from the district's government website:http://ostrovets.grodno-region.by/uploads/files/000225_408421__selskij_ispolnitelnyj_komitet.docI moved the values from "name" tags into "alt_name" tags and put names from the document into the "name" tags.... | |
| 5 | 2017-10-04 09:10:07 UTC | Jay May | Your threat of reporting the above to the DWG is absolutely ridiculous given the fact you are the one who has been reverting my changes without/before even asking why I made them, and thus you brought more confusion. Your behavior is contrary to the good practice of OSM, which pretty much puts your ... | |
| 6 | 2017-10-04 12:41:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Er - I'm confused...That document appears to be a document in Russian listing some village and settlement names in Russian. It merely confirms that these places have Russian names (which no-one disagrees with) as well as Belarusian names (which in this region I'm sure no-one disagrees with either... | |
| 7 | 2017-10-04 17:51:28 UTC | yaugenka | @SomeoneElse, that is exactly the case which we were explaning to everyone in defence of Russian names in the "name" tags - almost all offical documents and maps are in Russian language.This document is on the govenment website, govenment exacutive authority of the Ostivetskiy disctrict ... | |
| 8 | 2017-10-04 18:57:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | @yaugenka As I said, no one doubts that these places have BE and RU names. What I was asking about was your change of e.g. http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=1286803731 to lose the "Станция" part of the name (regardless of language). Separately to that, from looking at htt... | |
| 9 | 2017-10-04 19:33:21 UTC | yaugenka | @SomeoneElse, I'm not argueing about the use of the languigies right now. I just explained that regardless of that the document is in Russian it is an official one.The official name of the both settlesments is "Гудогай" without the "Малый" and "Станция&q... | |
| 10 | 2017-10-04 20:02:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's perfectly possible for 2 settlements (with different names) to be part of one larger admin area - I live in a place exactly like that myself. | |
| 11 | 2017-10-04 20:15:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also - on the "official languages" point, there are many places in OSM where the "official" language isn't the one used by people and on signs locally, and as per http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf it's the language used by people and o... | |
| 12 | 2017-10-04 20:41:06 UTC | yaugenka | Sorry, I do not quite understand why we are discussing the use of language here. How is it related to the difference between "Станция Гудогай" and "Гудогай". | |
| 13 | 2017-10-04 21:07:25 UTC | yaugenka | You can also look up the names in the official registry of settlements at http://maps.by/searchateHere is a screenshot from therehttps://www.awesomescreenshot.com/image/2866539/17f558f07c38fa35fd106b9e0650c342 | |
| 14 | 2017-10-04 21:22:17 UTC | yaugenka | If we talk just about the use of these names, then try to search for "Станция Гудогай" or "Малый Гудогай" on the web and you will get "п. Гудогай" and "д. Гудогай" instead, like on this wiki pagehttps://ru.wikipedia.... | |
| 15 | 2017-10-05 11:16:56 UTC | Jay May | If the values are wrong, I still don't see what I should keep them as they were. I've corrected many mistakes on OSM where the ending was not the proper one or the name was wrong (just as in this case). I haven't seen districts of one locality signed whatsoever. For instance, Bialkiški use... | |
| 16 | 2017-10-05 17:31:44 UTC | yaugenka | I'm greatfull for your contributions but mapping settlements from signs is not enough. The reality is constantly changing. Some settlements get annexed by larger ones or become independent or are renamed or cease to exist at all. And road signs are always going behind these changes.For example, Bi... | |
| 17 | 2017-10-05 18:23:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | > So one must always double check it > with the official registry.I can't comment about Belarus directly but "What people refer to a place and how they classify it" and "how something is treated officially" are often very different in OSM. In most places the former get... | |
| 18 | 2017-10-05 19:13:21 UTC | yaugenka | There is not a single settlement with "admin" tag in Belarus. All settlements are mapped with "place" tag and correspond to official registry. The prority of mapping for us is actually the law, then the registry and then the signs. Because first comes an official act (e.g. about ... | |
| 19 | 2017-10-06 06:24:36 UTC | Jay May | Bialkiški was marked as a neighborhood by myself :)There is one thing I noticed in Belarus (very similar to Lithuania and to Ireland): ZIP codes seem not to be used ... Maybe it would be good to find them and map them? | |
| 20 | 2017-10-06 07:42:37 UTC | yaugenka | Bialkiški was marked as a neighborhood by myself :) xm.. the history says it differenthttp://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=6910214http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=242995527 | |
| 21 | 2017-10-06 08:19:14 UTC | Jay May | Ah, rightttt. Looks like this Georgij also knows about this.However, I am the one who created the relation between Bialkiški and Astraviec. You are welcome to have a look if I did it the right way. | |
| 22 | 2017-10-06 16:22:39 UTC | yaugenka | Not quite. It would be correct if the area of Bialkiški was outside Astraviec. Astraviec would then consist of two separate polygons like in this examplehttp://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1996913.But Bialkiški is within Astraviec, i.e. one polygon is within another and this will... | |
| 23 | 2017-10-07 20:20:52 UTC | yaugenka | I have fixed the alt_name*s of Гудогай by myself and submitted a request to our state authority to provide the name of the official act according to which the names were officially changed. | |
| 24 | 2017-10-09 11:12:01 UTC | Jay May | O.K. To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised they are not even aware that those 2 villages have slightly different names ... I'm pretty confident their answer will be very interesting to read. | |
| 25 | 2017-10-13 16:13:10 UTC | yaugenka | Here is there answerhttps://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bwqmq6xk-oieRzJfRThiUWNaOURLY3Q3SXFfRW82ZGJEVXUwThey say that the addressing system (which includes the registry) was formally launched in 2012 and the villages have always been named in the registry as "п. Гудогай" and &quo... | |
| 26 | 2017-10-13 18:49:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | However, the law doesn't affect how we generally map stuff in OSM - it's what's on the ground that matters.Don't just take my word for it, either - here's an answer to a similar question elsewhere: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-October/017990.html . | |
| 27 | 2017-10-13 19:10:11 UTC | yaugenka | I understand the on the ground rule and do not insist on changing the name right now but they may and are likely to correct the sign soon. Is anyone going to travel there from time to time to track the change for the map to stay up to date? | |
| 28 | 2017-10-13 19:30:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Is anyone going to travel there from time to time to track the change for the map to stay up to date?To be honest, it's how I keep stuff up to date where I live. Obviously (as Canadians on OSM lists point out regularly) that's less applicable to places with a significantly lower population d... | |
| 29 | 2017-10-13 19:58:47 UTC | Jay May | I will be there in a week or two.About what you mentioned above on the ground rule regarding India: English has been chosen despite being a minority language because it is a language that is displayed in every roadsign, no matter the language of the province. Same for Ireland or the non-Brussels b... | |
| 30 | 2017-10-13 20:33:54 UTC | yaugenka | Imagine your need to make a business trip to this village and got a ticke to "п. Гудогай" - that is the name which is used in all documents and on the web. So you search for that name on the map but don't find any because on the map it is named "Станция Гудогай&q... | |
| 31 | 2017-10-14 10:38:54 UTC | Jay May | ...and then they arrive on-spot and see „Станцыя Гудагай” written in Belarusian, which makes them really wonder what exactly is wrong with those names ... Neither the language, neither the full name correspond. „Что сделать...” | |
| 32 | 2017-10-14 11:24:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info, there's a widely-used tag for the "official name" of places: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/official_name . | |
| 33 | 2017-10-14 11:37:39 UTC | yaugenka | What is the sense of introducing one extra tag when 99.99% of names correspond to official ones and the remaing 0.01% is a \tneglect of the authorities who did not change the sign properly? | |
| 34 | 2017-10-14 11:40:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Feel free to corretc me with actual numbers, but my impression so far is that a _very high percentage_ of names in OSM in BE don't match the names on the signs. One of the arguments put forward was that they are official names. | |
| 35 | 2017-10-14 11:43:44 UTC | yaugenka | >my impression so far is that a _very high percentage_ of names in OSM in BE don't match the names on the signs.Can you give some examples apart from "Гудогай" where the names mismatch? | |
| 36 | 2017-10-14 11:55:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Well, the DWG was sent lots of photographs of roadsigns and placenames in BE that in OSM are mapped in RU. | |
| 37 | 2017-10-14 12:16:46 UTC | yaugenka | We are not talking about the use of languages here, are we? This discussion is only about the correspondence of signs to official names. Both russian and belarusian names are official. | |
| 38 | 2017-10-16 05:53:16 UTC | Jay May | I wouldn't say "What is the sense of introducing one extra tag when 99.99% of names correspond to official ones". Given the number of wrong names I corrected on the Belarusian soil, I would say up to 80% of the names do correspond .Let alone the language question - many times the name in R... | |
| 39 | 2017-10-16 07:59:48 UTC | yaugenka | >I would say up to 80% of the names do correspondPlease provide examples of the 20%. | |
| 40 | 2017-10-16 11:50:19 UTC | Jay May | I've changed so many of them that now I won't remember everything :) Those Belarusian toponyms I had to change were mainly names with "-ызна" finishing with "-ына" in reality and the other way round (a lot of them), Янава called Янова officially (and other such n... | |
| 41 | 2017-10-16 17:03:18 UTC | yaugenka | >Янава called Янова officially.The first one is in Belarusian the second one is in Russaion. So you are mixing languauges here.>names with "-ызна" finishing with "-ына" in realityProvide exact examples please.>Валейкішкі on roadsigns / ... | |
| 52718951 by ChrissW-R1 | 1 | 2017-10-07 22:35:01 UTC | ChrissW-R1 | Partial reversion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51305204 |
| 2 | 2017-10-14 09:33:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info, the last time there was a discussion about this the comments included https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-August/019125.html . It's going to get broken again (it's too big to manage effectively, as noted in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-August/0... | |
| 52911363 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-10-14 01:40:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Unfortunately, wikidata generally speaking isn't a valid source for OSM - it's mostly just copied from wikipedia which has an licence that is incompatible with OSM.It's unclear how wikidata was used here, however, since there's no wiki* tag on this node.Regardless of that, any "tagfiddling&... |
| 2 | 2017-10-14 01:43:17 UTC | nyuriks | SomeoneElse, I think you are fixated. What is this has to do with Wikidata? I lived in St. Petersburg | |
| 3 | 2017-10-14 01:53:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | "created_by=OSM+Wikidata 0.1" | |
| 4 | 2017-10-14 02:08:59 UTC | nyuriks | and? That's the tool name. | |
| 5 | 2017-10-14 08:30:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've added no source for the data and used a "created_by" tag that looks like it might be a source. That's why I said "It's unclear how wikidata was used here" (please do actually read the comments that people make).It may be that you live locally and believe that the curren... | |
| 52889496 by Alan Bragg | 1 | 2017-10-13 18:43:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I think that this change might have included rather more objects than anticipated (including some not previously edited by andygol), such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420984991/historyBest Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-13 19:09:05 UTC | Alan Bragg | Thanks for your comment. I'll verify all the changes. This one was not by andygol but has the same problem and needs area=yes. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-13 19:32:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | There were also examples such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374923973/history which were previously mapped as area:highway. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-13 19:49:39 UTC | Alan Bragg | Yes, that one is ok. This area:highway=pedestrian or footway all seem to have cropped up in 2015. I was wondering why they did not render and got an answer from scai https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/60067/why-are-some-pedestrian-areas-not-rendering I'm attempting to fix the problems in the ... | |
| 5 | 2017-10-13 20:19:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | For completeness (and apologies if I'm stating the bleeding the obvious here), an "area:highway" is fundamentally different to a "highway; area=yes". Usually it won't make sense to change either the latter to the former or the former to the latter. There is at least one rendere... | |
| 6 | 2017-10-13 20:42:47 UTC | Alan Bragg | Yes, thanks, I do understand. andygol had changed all highway=pedestrian area=yes to area:highway=pedestrian which caused all plaza type areas in the USA to become black holes in the map. I've been following this note "Note on area=yesDon't use area:highway=* for plazas and similiar features.... | |
| 52903289 by user_5359 | 1 | 2017-10-13 18:45:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for this!Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-13 22:29:57 UTC | freebeer | Pity that these reverts don't seem to have lasted long.(Kids these days. Why, when I was young...)(me wonders what the highest revision number is in OSM and if this is an attempt to top that) | |
| 52875775 by Prinny Em | 1 | 2017-10-13 05:37:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap,Please don't add fake data to OSM (there isn't an embassy on the M1 just north of the Derby Road bridge - people would have noticed it).By all means please add things that aren't currently mapped and really do exist - but don't make things up.Best Regards,A... |
| 52858569 by Abdelali BOUSSIB | 1 | 2017-10-12 16:01:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Er, what? This is in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. |
| 2 | 2017-10-12 16:02:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Ce changement est dans l'océan Atlantique. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-12 23:26:01 UTC | Abdelali BOUSSIB | Il y aurait sûrement un changement de coordonnés merci pour votre attention | |
| 52772630 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-10-12 13:58:56 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Hello SomeoneElse. Athttp://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5157855483http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5157855481http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5157855484you have created the new lifecycle-prefix `broken`. Could it also be `demolished`?http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished: |
| 2 | 2017-10-12 14:52:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | No, it's not demolished, it's just broken. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-12 14:55:07 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Ok. ;-)https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=brokenhttps://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=damaged | |
| 43560787 by Art School Restaurant | 1 | 2017-10-12 12:09:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Currently the "Art School Restaurant" is in the middle of a road - presumably that's not really where it is? |
| 2 | 2017-10-12 12:22:29 UTC | Art School Restaurant | It is just to the right of the icon, that's the closest it would go but that is the correct spot on Sugnall Street. Albeit not in the middle of the road, rather dangerous for dining. Thanks for spotting it, we will endeavour to shift the icon to the right. | |
| 52809865 by Danible | 1 | 2017-10-11 12:22:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I think you've accidentally included some test data in here (you can see if you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52809865 that your change stretches all the way down from Canada to mid-Atlantic, where the test data such as "Purple Street"... |
| 48264000 by jraller | 1 | 2017-09-14 09:06:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just for info I've tidied up edits in this area by http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/higuy and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/helloworld69 . I've suggested to those users that they might want to try OpenGeoFiction instead http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1478 http://www.openstreetma... |
| 2 | 2017-10-11 06:41:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | ... and also just for info, http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1561 (I reverted the two changes by that user). | |
| 52643269 by Miles Gough | 1 | 2017-10-10 22:07:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Miles,Did you obtain a waiver to use the data here under the ODBL? As published at https://www.data.brisbane.qld.gov.au/data/dataset/road-restrictions/resource/6b01de54-d739-4116-8e33-e58efc2b78e3 it seems to be CC-BY-4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 and as such not licence-co... |
| 2 | 2017-10-10 23:54:04 UTC | TheSwavu | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/data.brisbane.qld.gov.au_explicit_permission | |
| 51017460 by ڕاستی | 1 | 2017-08-17 19:40:55 UTC | Øukasz | helloyou deleted a lot of tags from Jalala - why? |
| 2 | 2017-08-17 19:48:30 UTC | Øukasz | also Hanakin tags are deleted | |
| 3 | 2017-10-10 19:37:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello ڕاستی, In this change you removed a lot of different language name tags from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/248436981/history , including the Arabic one.Can you explain why?Best Regards,Andy Townsend,on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group | |
| 4 | 2017-10-10 19:38:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | You can see the changes here:http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=248436981 | |
| 51950511 by Museum Shop | 1 | 2017-09-11 20:24:41 UTC | confusedbuffalo | Looks good to me (from a distance).My only query is on the three paths in Walton Park that you edited, changing them from track to footway, they all have the note "No longer in use", which was added in 2015 when the footway tag was removed. If they are in fact in use, it seems to me that... |
| 2 | 2017-10-10 11:16:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | If it's paths like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106343780/history , they come and go - it depends on whether the grass has been cut recently and how wet the ground is. I haven't been through there this year, so can't really comment on what the current situation is. | |
| 52724867 by SK53 | 1 | 2017-10-10 10:34:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530972231 really a separate road to the A38? I thought it was just a right turn lane separated by chevrons (as per the imagery)? I know that some other sections are fairly separated (e.g. by the garage) but thought that this wasn't? |
| 2 | 2017-10-13 11:39:21 UTC | SK53 | Yeah, fairly marginal. There is an island separating the turn lane from straight on. Don't think there are turn restrictions though. I was meaning to add the unrestricted speed limit from the M1 roundabout :-) | |
| 52761201 by datafreedomfighter | 1 | 2017-10-09 15:50:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I think something's gone wrong with this data - it you have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2&way=531258403#map=17/18.48038/-66.82619 you can see that there's a lot of duplication of uploaded nodes, many nodes aren't part of any ot... |
| 2 | 2017-10-10 09:09:13 UTC | ToeBee | This changeset has been reverted by changeset 52781929 | |
| 52680891 by civil142 | 1 | 2017-10-06 13:54:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - that now appears at e.g. https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=18&lat=53.167006&lon=-1.39344 . |
| 52556921 by civil142 | 1 | 2017-10-05 20:12:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5142606995 here, but you might want to add a bit more detail other than just the name - if it's the office of a company, you could add an "office=company" tag. In the "iD" editor click on it, an... |
| 52570531 by gonn | 1 | 2017-10-04 12:35:25 UTC | glglgl | I wonder what makes you think there is a café in the middle of the ocean? |
| 2 | 2017-10-05 20:03:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's not the user's fault - it's a bug in POI+. See https://github.com/davidchiles/osm-poi-editor-iOS/issues/12 . | |
| 52420815 by Batareikin | 1 | 2017-09-27 21:14:10 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the names you are adding appear to be transliterations which should not be added to OSM. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliterationLast time I was in Telford or Wellington there were certainly no Russian Names on the signs.This edit should be reverted. |
| 2 | 2017-09-27 23:28:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Batareikin,You've been asked by other mappers many times before to not add transliterations or data from unknown sources - see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=127299 for details. Please respect the wishes of the community. I'm sure for example that http://www.ope... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-28 06:10:16 UTC | Batareikin | Hi trigpoint, Andy TownsendЕсли не знаете или забыли, то напомню Вам, что русские топонимы НЕ ТРАНСЛИТЕРИЮТСЯ, а ТРАНСКРИБИРУЮТСЯ! И разницу меду этими понятиями надо понимать... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-28 15:44:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you tell me where I can verify that Castle Bytham does indeed have a separate Russian name (as distinct from any transliteration? | |
| 5 | 2017-09-28 18:14:37 UTC | Batareikin | SomeoneElse: Конечно могу сказать. Только Вы опять упоминаете какую-то "any transliteration". 1. Вы разницу между транскрипцией и транслитерацией понимаете? 2. Вы знаете о т... | |
| 6 | 2017-09-28 19:49:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you answer the question?Can you tell me where I can verify that Castle Bytham does indeed have a Russian name? Anyone can make up a name for any place by any method they like. I could decide that London is actually called Fintlwoodlwix, and create a map showing that. It doesn't, howev... | |
| 7 | 2017-09-29 06:12:40 UTC | Batareikin | Я могу ответить на ваш вопрос.Только сначала Вы попробуйте ответить на мои вопросы.Тогда может и ваш вопрос отпадет сами собой.Каждый не сможет "make up " топо... | |
| 8 | 2017-09-29 08:58:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Но если вы хотите проверить правильность написания например деревни Касл-Байтем, то вам надо зайти в какую-нибудь российскуй библиотеку и взять почитать "Вел... | |
| 9 | 2017-09-29 09:00:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Два момента - во-первых, тот, кто написал это, просто транслитерировал его с английского, а во-вторых, вы импортируете данные из внешнего источника. Прочтите https://wiki.op... | |
| 10 | 2017-09-29 18:46:26 UTC | Batareikin | Два момента:Во первых - НЕ ТРАНСЛИТЕРИРОВАЛ его! И совсем не просто!Во вторых я ничего НЕ ИМПОРТИРОВАЛ, тем более автоматически! Весь текст на русском я набираю ... | |
| 11 | 2017-09-29 18:50:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Er - no need to shout! | |
| 12 | 2017-09-29 18:53:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Весь текст на русском я набираю на клавиатуре смартфона. But where did you copy it from? If it's something like a book, what is the licence? | |
| 13 | 2017-09-30 12:47:17 UTC | Batareikin | Я не кричу, я просто делаю акценты на слова, чтобы вы пристально обратили на них внимание и попытались понять смысл всего сказанного мною ранее (курсива или жирного ... | |
| 14 | 2017-09-30 12:51:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Неужели у вас в Великобритании слово London кому-то принадлежит!? И откуда его скопировали?А на использование слова Liverpool у вас тоже должна иметься лицензия, чтобы ... | |
| 15 | 2017-09-30 13:12:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Вы конечно можете не знать, но у нас отдельные слова не являются объектами авторского права. Их нельзя присвоить себе и соответственно нельзя наложить на них огр... | |
| 16 | 2017-10-05 19:22:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Asking again, in case the notification for the previous one somehow got lost:Please do explain where you found the name "Касл-Байтем", where you copied it from, and what licence applies to that data. Please also explain how I may verify that name the next time that I visit Cast... | |
| 17 | 2017-10-17 13:05:38 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53011130 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names that appear to have been copied from a Russian library book. See block 1591 and changeset 52420815 for the attempt to find out licence details (or where the names may be veri... | |
| 18 | 2017-10-18 19:22:58 UTC | Batareikin | Энди ТаунсендВам же объяснили что слова сами по себе не являются объектами авторского права. Они не могут облагаться какой либо лицензией. И не могут быть несовме... | |
| 52427936 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-09-28 12:14:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | nyuriks,You appear to be continuing with this mechanical edit despite being told to stop, and while discussion on the list and at e.g. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59910 is still going on. You appear determined to force your views on the OSM community despite the fact that dis... |
| 2 | 2017-09-28 19:34:00 UTC | nyuriks | SomeoneElse, this is becoming a harassing behavior. Where do you see a mechanical edit? This was a single node manual edit. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-28 20:01:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | It was submitted 10 seconds after the previous changeset and 20 seconds before the next. That's unfortunately a common behaviour where people want to be seen to be doing "single" edits but in fact are just mechanically changing object after object without doing any sort of checks on what... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-28 20:16:04 UTC | nyuriks | Yes. In a group of 10 nodes. Each of which were checked by hand. I know the rules, and despite your accusations, I haven't broken any of them. I specifically studied the mechanical edits policy. | |
| 5 | 2017-09-28 20:17:02 UTC | nyuriks | The group was checked, individually. Afterwards, they were uploaded one by one because they appeared in different places of the world. | |
| 6 | 2017-09-28 21:02:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | What about previous changes, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52369774 ? Was that a mechanical edit? | |
| 7 | 2017-09-28 21:05:26 UTC | nyuriks | Yes they were. They were clearly marked as mechanical (with the word auto). And they followed the rules. | |
| 8 | 2017-09-28 21:34:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | > And they followed the rules.Are you sure? What you're supposed to do is laid out in some detail at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct , including a "Document_and_discuss_your_plans" section. Can you explain how you followed that? As far as I can ... | |
| 9 | 2017-09-29 01:38:39 UTC | nyuriks | Which portion of it did I fail to address? Global note, discussion, proceeded. Not a mixed response - every concern was answered on the email channel (except for one email that was not raising any reasonable objection as I later noted), and did not receive any further comment until restarted. If yo... | |
| 10 | 2017-09-30 11:32:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Which portion of it did I fail to address?Firstly and most importantly, you were mechanically adding while the discussion was going on, if not before.In additon to that:o You did not place your documentation on the wiki.o You did not " work with [dissenters] to understand their rea... | |
| 11 | 2017-09-30 11:42:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Sorry to have to spell this out in quite such detail above but your comment "Which portion of it did I fail to address" suggests one of two things:1) A complete failure to understand what other mappers, and OSM documentation, are saying to you. 2) You're just being mendacious. Perhap... | |
| 12 | 2017-10-01 02:19:21 UTC | nyuriks | * The discussion was quiet for 4 days* Every raised point was addressed, as was mentioned in the talk. Several people meticulously answered all of the objections. One objection was un-answerable because it basically claimed something without backing it up. Regardless, I worked very attentively wi... | |
| 13 | 2017-10-01 11:48:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thank you for finally admitting that yes, you did perform a mechanical edit and that no, you did not follow the documented procedure.Which were the 4 days on which you claim there was no discussion on "talk" about this? | |
| 14 | 2017-10-01 17:33:39 UTC | nyuriks | Serious? The automated edits were marked with the word "auto", and I kept saying I was doing them mechanically after the discussion! You correctly pointed out that I forgot to add the auto/username wiki page, which has already been rectified. This is something you could have told me a ve... | |
| 15 | 2017-10-01 17:51:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | > This is something you could have told me a very long time ago, instead of wasting many hours and aggravation. Lest we forget, a member of the OSM community told you about https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct 12 days ago on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset... | |
| 16 | 2017-10-01 19:01:47 UTC | nyuriks | Andy, that article is very long, and only mentions "Automated edits/username" once in middle. Noone has mentioned that specific piece of information until you did yesterday, and I immediately complied. Until I saw it, I was fully convinced I followed all other rules outlined there. It wou... | |
| 17 | 2017-10-04 13:51:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Andy, that article is very longI'n sorry, but the text on that page is 10457 bytes in total. Reader mode in FF estimates "10-12 minutes". If you can't be bothered to read that in full then words fail me. | |
| 18 | 2017-10-04 14:20:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also re "about 4 days" - https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-September/078805.html was at "Sat Sep 23 03:15:13 UTC 2017" and the first "auto" changeset seems to behttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52333709 , created at "2017-09-24T17:03:28Z&... | |
| 52344210 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-09-26 15:32:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Here you added https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2407197?uselang=en-GB to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/598000917 (which is correct). Are you now going to remove it from https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/957593 which you did in error in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44200317 which ... |
| 2 | 2017-09-26 16:17:25 UTC | nyuriks | Andy, are you saying that neither Q2407197 nor en:Tibshelf should be attached to rel 957593 ? It the WD item is correct for both - it is both the city and the parish. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-26 23:37:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | (re Tibshelf) as of 12 days ago it does now claim to be both a village and a civil parish; only 10 months after you added the wikidata entry to the relation.Can you guarantee that all similar errors in wikidata have been similarly corrected? | |
| 4 | 2017-09-27 00:31:05 UTC | nyuriks | SomeoneElse, I cannot guarantee anything. Ever. I can only attempt to find existing errors in the data and expose them. So far, thanks to my efforts, thousands of major errors have been corrected. As I numerously stated, and you chose to ignore -- wikidata ID is simply a more permanent wikipedia ... | |
| 5 | 2017-09-27 00:38:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | > , thanks to my efforts, thousands of major errors have been correctedYou keep saying this. Can you provide a list? I've seen very few fixes to OSM data in these changes.Also, if wikidata and wikipedia IDs both identify the same object why add both? Just leave the human-readable one in ... | |
| 6 | 2017-09-27 00:47:22 UTC | nyuriks | https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Data:Sandbox/Yurik/OSM_objects_pointing_to_disambigs.tab&action=history -- every revision had entries that community fixed. There are many other places, but this is the easiest to show. Lately, people fixed it directly from my service. When first ... | |
| 7 | 2017-10-02 09:55:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Re "every revision had entries that community fixed." I've not sure what that table shows, presumably a "disambig" is a wikipedia thing that we are supposed to know about in OSM? Do you mean wikipedia disambiguation pages where one word can have multiple meanings? My problem wi... | |
| 8 | 2017-10-03 05:21:01 UTC | nyuriks | You misunderstood. I used MediaWiki & Commons to store errors that I found in OSM. There were several people who went there to fix uncovered issues. Also, realize that there are plenty of people who gave up arguing - see last discussion https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Yurik Anothe... | |
| 9 | 2017-10-04 13:39:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | > There were several people who > went there to fix uncovered issues. ... > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Yurik Based on the people who've edited that that'd be 2 people? Also comments there include "I would really advice to stop pushing for worldwide mechanical... | |
| 52409686 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2017-09-27 16:58:52 UTC | John-O | Why `path` as opposed to `footway` ?From memory there are three cairns in at least one of the locations. They are more like carefully constructed rock pillar than a pile of stones |
| 2 | 2017-09-28 00:43:37 UTC | gurglypipe | See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path; it’s not urban. Feel free to improve the cairn mapping; I was just fixing the tagging. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-28 11:43:27 UTC | ACS1986 | Hi,I agree with John on this.The fact that a Wiki editor thinks that you should use highway=footway for urban paths doesn't mean that highway=path has to be used for non-urban paths. Choice between 'Classic' (highway=footway/bridleway/cycleway) and 'Alternative' (highway=path) tagging methods ha... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-29 13:27:49 UTC | gurglypipe | Ah, this is more complex than I thought. I was just going off the descriptions of highway={footway,path} in iD. I have not verified the path’s access restrictions in person, although given the area they’re probably going to be the same as the shooting track since it’s all moorland ... | |
| 5 | 2017-09-30 14:09:45 UTC | ACS1986 | Thanks, and you're welcome. Unfortunately there is inconsistency in how these tags are used between countries. It is common in some places (particularly Germany) to use 'footway' for urban paths and 'path' for rural ones and that's probably some of the views in the Wiki and the ID descriptions arise... | |
| 6 | 2017-10-02 09:20:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just to chime in here, +1 to Adam and John above.The mailing lists have lots of detail on how highway=path came about when highway=footway etc. already existed, and certainly highway=path is widely used in e.g. Germany for what we would call "a footpath"If something "looks like so... | |
| 7 | 2017-10-02 09:27:35 UTC | gurglypipe | Thanks. Although the fact that the UK seems to rely on all contributors having read the mailing list archive (or asking repeat questions on the mailing list) is somewhat frustrating. That’s really the point of having a wiki. | |
| 8 | 2017-10-02 09:43:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | One problem with the wiki (or any wiki) is that it's difficult for it to get across the key points of where there are conflicting views. The "classic vs alternate" table is one of the better examples of doing that, where Harry Wood (I think) spent a lot of time putting it all together.M... | |
| 52419133 by trigpoint | 1 | 2017-09-30 06:56:29 UTC | Wynndale | Could you explain what was wrong with the edits you reverted? |
| 2 | 2017-10-02 09:28:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Wynndale - for one example see my comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52400509 . I suspect that they're creating personal notes in MAPS.ME and are probably not even aware that they're adding data to OSM (in the case of that changeset that I commented on, something that when translat... | |
| 51872228 by kr_maps | 1 | 2017-09-09 20:47:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello kr_maps and welcome to OSM!I already had a go at adding ESC to OSM as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3800676729 . Maybe that didn't show up in OsmAnd? Not sure about the best tag though - it's not really a shop, and "adult gaming centre" usually used for gambling arcades.Ch... |
| 2 | 2017-09-12 21:12:32 UTC | kr_maps | Ah yes. Your node doesn't show in OsmAnd but clearly is there really, not sure why considering it was created a while ago. Anyway I will delete the duplicate I made! | |
| 3 | 2017-10-01 16:25:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just for info, I've changed ESC to "leisure=escape_game" which is in use elsewhere and a much better description. It probably still won't show in OsmAnd, but it should appear at e.g. https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=20&lat=53.2345533&lon=-1.430816 . | |
| 52476334 by ajithkarunaratne | 1 | 2017-09-29 16:19:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Not sure how it happened, but this changeset deleted a buoy from the middle of the Atlantic (it's been restored now)Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-09-29 20:52:54 UTC | ajithkarunaratne | Dear Andy,I'm extremely sorry about the mistake. It's not a deliberate thing. I just tried the "ADD NODE" tool in JOSM for the first time and it made me make a node somewhere else. Then I deleted it believing it was the unintended node made me. That might be the reason for this grave m... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-29 21:12:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | No worries - you're not the first person to have been caught out by JOSM's "add node"! | |
| 52477296 by malcolmh | 1 | 2017-09-29 16:17:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! |
| 52344226 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-09-28 12:25:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | How can I verify the tag "wikidata=Q4929299" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26421469 ? Strictly speaking, the OSM node isn't the cave itself but the entrance to it (to be fair the cave itself isn't that far away).Also, geographically this is a huge changeset covering a very lar... |
| 2 | 2017-09-28 19:36:21 UTC | nyuriks | Should 26421469 node have a wikipedia tag? If not, both should be deleted, but it appeared legit enough to stay. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-28 19:58:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | It depends how lax you want to be about data linkage. The WP article is about the thing the OSM node links to, so it's useful in that sense, but it's not about the OSM node itself. I don't think that it makes sense to remove the WP link since it's useful information here. If you want to do it p... | |
| 51820940 by LLlypuk82 | 1 | 2017-09-07 20:57:38 UTC | Jay May | Hello. May I know the reason why you are reverting names? |
| 2 | 2017-09-07 21:29:45 UTC | LLlypuk82 | Hello. Yes, of course. According Закон Республики Беларусь от 16.11.2010 №190-З "О наименованиях географических объектов" (http://pravo.newsby.org/belarus/zakon0/z326.htm) geonames in Belarus are assigned and stored in two lan... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-07 21:47:10 UTC | Jay May | If I follow your logic, then I should change by default each country/region/village where the majority of the population speaks another language than the one on the roadsigns (for example, I should put Polish in Eastern Lithuania, Russian in Eastern Latvia, Hungarian in Southern Slovakia and to Arab... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-07 21:50:03 UTC | Jay May | P.S.: Please note even Russian maps Yandex use Belarusian names as the main ones. | |
| 5 | 2017-09-07 21:59:32 UTC | LLlypuk82 | Are you sure about Yandex? There is a screenshot https://fotki.yandex.ru/next/users/sanik82/album/419689/view/1443769 | |
| 6 | 2017-09-07 22:06:56 UTC | LLlypuk82 | You use incorrect analogies. Not simply "the majority of the population speaks another language than the one on the road signs", but majority of the citizens of the Belarus. | |
| 7 | 2017-09-08 05:07:43 UTC | Jay May | As soon as I am in front of a computer I will post a screenshot of Yandex (I don't know how to post it over here).Anyway my point is: OSM is not about politics or personal language preference, but about reflecting the reality and so far we were not doing that in Belarus. I drive there every two we... | |
| 8 | 2017-09-08 06:09:38 UTC | Ambush | LLlypuk82 OSM is not about language problems of biggest part of country population, it is about reflecting geographical objects in geographical data base. According to law you cited, geographical names assigned in Belarusian, then they are transliterated to Russian because this is the second nation... | |
| 9 | 2017-09-08 06:20:16 UTC | mOlind | Agreed. "name" tag is for name as it written on sign. name:ru and name:by could be filled too. To let users choose what name they want to read. Same value inside name and name:by is ok. First tolds us what should we expect to see and second in 100% times in Belarusian. | |
| 10 | 2017-09-08 06:39:30 UTC | Jay May | Screenshots from what I see from my computer on Yandex:- In English: https://plus.google.com/u/1/photos/116538206482963449572/album/6463292506880436433/6463292504796189858?authkey=CPHviqDkqcGDfw- In Russian: https://plus.google.com/u/1/photos/116538206482963449572/album/6463292506880436433/64632... | |
| 11 | 2017-09-08 07:27:39 UTC | Георгий Ильин | Напишу по-Английски ))@Jay May, thank you for highlighting this in pm. I will reply later.@LLlypuk82: please understand that this is not against Russian language ))) We have to leave the Russian name, but only in the name:ru tag (unless it appears in Russian on-spot, like for in... | |
| 12 | 2017-09-08 15:25:14 UTC | Jaŭhien | For example Google Maps https://i.imgur.com/V2SFlRN.png use the names of cities, villages and etc in Belarusian language and łacinka. Google have many users on the world, but all ok for tourists and the population of the country | |
| 13 | 2017-09-08 16:51:07 UTC | yaugenka | @Jay May, if you visit Belarus and ask people for directions, you will hardly get a reply in Belarussian language anywhere. That it the reality of our countly and the name tag must reflect that realy. If somebody wants to have names displayed in Belarussian they are free to use the name:be tag which... | |
| 14 | 2017-09-08 17:31:05 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | The main argument is the signs of the names of cities and towns that the driver sees. Seen by the driver, should be in the name. The remaining arguments (the internal language policy of the government, the language of communication of local residents) is for other mapping projects.If the Russian... | |
| 15 | 2017-09-08 18:06:33 UTC | yaugenka | The "group of people who contradict the principle of "on-ground"" signs comprize 74% of the pupulation of the country. By introducting this change you would abuse the primary users of OSM Belarus - the citizens of the country. | |
| 16 | 2017-09-08 19:08:58 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | You are plotting with official statistics. 74 percent are the urban population. The rural provincial population - the situation on the contrary - there is approximately the same figure Belarusian-speaking population. So we have parity. Or, in plain language, 50 percent of both languages comes out. Y... | |
| 17 | 2017-09-08 20:31:35 UTC | yaugenka | @Poliakoff Mykhailo, can you provide any proves of your statement that both language are used 50/50? Have you ever been in our country at all? I myself come from a village and can assure you that no one is speaking Belarusian there, those 26% are mostly located in big cities. I'm just wondering why ... | |
| 18 | 2017-09-08 22:08:19 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | In the project's argument is banners/signs/names of settlements. The argument about who what morvoû talks is not the main one. Map of what is done for turitìv. With the tourist will communicate the convenient to him. You do not mind that the plaques with the names of Belarusian. So then... | |
| 19 | 2017-09-08 23:05:25 UTC | yaugenka | Your suggestion to have two names in one one tag is out of this topic. We are now talking about replacement of russian names by belarusian ones.The number of local people using the map for business and leisure is by far bigger than the number of foreign tourists and regardless of what is written o... | |
| 20 | 2017-09-09 12:52:43 UTC | Ambush | yaugenka: one more time: Ground Truth rule is not about local traditions and preferences, it's about Ground Truth. And OSM is not a local Belarusian project. It's world wide. So you can't sacrifice billions of planet Earth people to a couple of millions citizens of one little country. | |
| 21 | 2017-09-09 12:58:38 UTC | yaugenka | @ambush, it is the question of number of users, not population. | |
| 22 | 2017-09-09 13:28:46 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | Yaugenka care less on rules and on the arguments. To him, the main thing that the Russian language everywhere won the Belarusian language. The victory should be by humiliation, discrimination of the Belarusian language. His pattern of behavior in these discussions it confirms absolutely. | |
| 23 | 2017-09-09 14:54:35 UTC | yaugenka | @Poliakoff Mykhailo, if you visit Belarus and talk to people you will hardly find anyone talking against the Belarusian language and me is not an exception. You guys are giving favor to foreign tourist, whereas I defent the interest of local people nation-wide, not just some minority. | |
| 24 | 2017-09-09 14:59:44 UTC | mOlind | I think yaugenka just misses main point. There is no negative effect for russian speaking users. Because most applications let users to change language. Open openstreetmap.by and check it yourself. There is no single reason to keep russian instead belarussian in name tag. Only because it's easier to... | |
| 25 | 2017-09-09 15:02:24 UTC | Ambush | Guys, according to what we discussed here and in personal mail I've reverted this reverting changeset. For me it's a very strange situation to discuss should we follow main OSM rules for Belarus or not. I want to propose to ask DWG to help us if we can't find satisfying decision. | |
| 26 | 2017-09-09 15:25:49 UTC | LLlypuk82 | OK. What will you propose for situation when road signs have bilingual (or more) inscriptions? | |
| 27 | 2017-09-09 20:31:38 UTC | Jay May | - Village, town and city names: name:* in Belarusian only.- Street signs: this is the tricky part. In Minsk or Brest, the situation is clear (official street signs are all in Belarusian). However, there are some towns or villages without any official street signs, just the name on the street (usua... | |
| 28 | 2017-09-09 22:24:13 UTC | yaugenka | Can anyone tell the purpose of the name tag in general? is it just for putting sign info into it and remain them whenever signs get changed? | |
| 29 | 2017-09-10 08:13:05 UTC | Jay May | The "name=*" tag in general is to show what is written on the road, street or shop signs, whatever it is. | |
| 30 | 2017-09-10 13:07:23 UTC | Ambush | I agree with Jay May. And I want to say that if someone see the name at the road sign in Russian, he can ask local authorities to fix it according to cited law. | |
| 31 | 2017-09-10 19:32:30 UTC | yaugenka | What are your aguments for renaming according to the on-ground rule except for "just because it is common convention"? | |
| 32 | 2017-09-10 20:30:58 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | Скажыце калі ласка, калі вы рэгістраваліся ў дадзеным праекце вы гатовыя былі паважаць правілы праекта падабаюцца ці не падабаюцца яны вам? Тым у што ваша пытанне з... | |
| 33 | 2017-09-11 18:50:12 UTC | yaugenka | @Poliakoff Mykhailo,I stop any communication with you because are not following the conversation and are making provoking comments.@Jay May, @Ambush, @mOlind, @Григорий Ильин, @Jaŭhien,Here are our main arguments against the change.1. There are no official up-to-date printed ... | |
| 34 | 2017-09-11 20:17:31 UTC | Георгий Ильин | My name is Георгий, not Григорий )))) Moreover, I see no provocation from Poliakoff Mykhailo, just emotions. Anyway, guys, please don't get personal (both yaugenka and Mykhailo). Let's keep this discussion calm and constructive.About your arguments:1) This doesn't change the fact ... | |
| 35 | 2017-09-11 21:32:45 UTC | yaugenka | @Георгий Ильин, first let me apologies for the mistyped name. Secondly, let me clarify the points.Whatever language you select in your settings you will still get the name from "name" tag displayed on http://www.openstreetmap.org and in editors. I think there is no need to ex... | |
| 36 | 2017-09-11 22:06:05 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | (@Poliakoff Mykhailo, I stop any communication with you because are not following the conversation and are making provoking comments.@Jay May, @Ambush, @mOlind, @Григорий Ильин, @Jaŭhien, )Согласно сложившейся практики ведения дискуссии ... | |
| 37 | 2017-09-12 00:09:53 UTC | yaugenka | @Mykhailo, you already can be banned for changing the data and open calls to continue changing the data while the discussion is still going on.The above mentioned official internet resource can freely be used for validation. Can you name any alternatives in the Belarusian language? | |
| 38 | 2017-09-12 05:37:30 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | (you already can be banned for changing the data and open calls to continue changing the data while the discussion is still going on.)- продублируйте на русском , агнлийский язык для меня совсем чужой , а в переводе Гугл и Майк... | |
| 39 | 2017-09-12 07:59:25 UTC | yaugenka | @Mykhailo,1. you was writing in Enlish very well previously, so the statement that you don't understand English is a cheat.2. the statement that official sources cannot be relied on is absolutely illogical. The same thing about replying on wikipedia.3. it is a shame to here from an attorney th... | |
| 40 | 2017-09-12 09:57:40 UTC | mavl | Hello all. > The local convention for using Russian language in the "name" tag exists from the very beginning of the osm project... yaugenka, does OSM wiki contain this convention? Vladimir Marshinin Data Working Group | |
| 41 | 2017-09-12 14:21:44 UTC | 4004 | While most of you here provide convincing arguments in favour of name:be->name, yaugenka is correct in pointing out name:be tags don't even cover some areas. Belarusian OSM community has long wanted/struggled to do the switch, but it would leave a map in disarray and possibly introduce challenges... | |
| 42 | 2017-09-12 15:46:19 UTC | Jay May | @4004: all transition periods have their own issues and there is no problem without any solution ;) Poliakoff Mykhailo seems to know a lot on a similar case: neighboring Ukraine. Anyway, on such technical details I prefer reading your propositions because I'm not as good as you guys yet. But some ... | |
| 43 | 2017-09-12 17:39:50 UTC | Ambush | And there is not a problem if there will be different languages in name (for objects which haven't name:be filled) because whole OSM name's on the planet are in different languages. If it just haven't any Belarusian alternative, it'll be left in Russian. | |
| 44 | 2017-09-12 18:08:37 UTC | LLlypuk82 | @mavlЗдесь говорится о соглашении 2009 года:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Belarus:Map_languages | |
| 45 | 2017-09-12 19:36:44 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | You must understand that the further delay matters more complicated will be the solution. Take the similar project of Google, there is a fairly well is in difficulties, you're specifying, the Belarusian version of the map. And done it all for the year and a half: Belarusian street caused caused by... | |
| 46 | 2017-09-12 23:22:29 UTC | yaugenka | @Mykhailo, you are again trying to mislead the discussion. The main argument in defence of this change is that our local convention contradicts the common rule of the on-the-ground signs.If we start following the common rule it will not be a Belarusian map. It will be a mixture of Belarusian and R... | |
| 47 | 2017-09-13 04:37:10 UTC | mavl | > Здесь говорится о соглашении 2009 года... LLlypuk82, thank you very much for it. > in disputed areas, the name that must appear is the one on the sign See also [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes] Belarus is the stable cou... | |
| 48 | 2017-09-13 06:32:59 UTC | Георгий Ильин | A disputed area it is not necessarily an area where there is an ongoing war or that is politically unstable. A disputed area in OSM is also an area where not everyone agrees on the language that should be displayed, and it is the case of Belarus. It is also the case of some regions in stable count... | |
| 49 | 2017-09-13 06:54:52 UTC | Jay May | Wow guys, this discussion is really active :D As I'm not getting the notifications on my email, I am always amazed when I enter this thread.Let us be clear once again (sorry if I repeat what was written a couple of times):a) As a couple of us pointed out, the agreement shown above violates the m... | |
| 50 | 2017-09-13 07:36:34 UTC | Георгий Ильин | Yes )))) We are active ))) But I find it is not fair that 2 people are slowing the whole process while we had been discussing these matters for months and we had agreed on making the Belarus map realistic. To me they can be helpful on the technical part, but overall the decision has been made and it... | |
| 51 | 2017-09-13 08:15:23 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | A result of our discussion is checking for durability of основообразующего principle of project of on ground/ Ancient римляны to our era created wisdom integrity is stopped up in that . A law is severe, but it is a law. In the original of dura lex sed lex. On the observance o... | |
| 52 | 2017-09-13 08:36:39 UTC | 4004 | >Belarus is the only former USSR country where the use of Russian has increased. That is a matter of fact. However, all toponyms are in BelarusianThis is (perhaps sadly) not always the case. If you transit/travel through Belarus you might get the impression that Belarusian is indeed used univer... | |
| 53 | 2017-09-13 09:04:17 UTC | Jay May | @4004: the majority of us agreed on switching the name tag to Belarusian and to check whether the name:ru tag is filled. This is for toponyms, monuments, and administrative levels (when you travel into Belarus), you see clearly written "Мінская воблсасць" and not "Ми... | |
| 54 | 2017-09-13 09:29:10 UTC | 4004 | @Jay May>for toponyms, monuments, and administrative levelsThis should work fine for admin levels (100% bilingual I believe). Toponyms will need some work (last figure I've seen was around 70%?), while monuments is debatable, but alas.Indeed, at the time the convention was agreed there was ... | |
| 55 | 2017-09-13 10:09:15 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | @4004 Monuments are low-level edits. We are now discussing the high-level amendments-human settlements. In Ukraine, monuments of Soviet time survived also in Russian. But they did not become a hindrance to ukrainization even in the Russian-speaking territories of Ukraine. Monuments, I guess not so m... | |
| 56 | 2017-09-13 10:17:37 UTC | Jay May | @Poliakoff Mykhailo - Your point is good. You mention the ў, it is usually automatically transliterated automatically into "y" instead of "ŭ" when you switch to another language than Russian. This is why it is extremely important not to forget to transliterate into Latin in the... | |
| 57 | 2017-09-13 10:31:17 UTC | 4004 | It certainly will look similar, at least at first.@Poliakoff Mykhailo if we are talking technical points now, such a switch would introduce challenges not only for those without a "ў"-supporting keyboard, but also those confused by 2 languages used side-by-side in similar contexts, be i... | |
| 58 | 2017-09-13 11:41:32 UTC | Jay May | @4004 Anyway, nobody is trying to Belarusize business names ;) And about monuments, I had included it for 2 reasons:- they are always shown in Belarusian on roadsigns- On those monuments you usually have some sign with the word "каштоўнасць" ("monument" if I'm not ... | |
| 59 | 2017-09-13 12:32:52 UTC | mOlind | I vote for automatic process. It's easy to break things when manually changing ways and relations. | |
| 60 | 2017-09-13 12:35:39 UTC | Jay May | Given what mOlind just mentioned, I also vote for an automatic process. | |
| 61 | 2017-09-13 13:46:21 UTC | 4004 | @Jay May I believe you might've mixed up monuments (which include Lenin statues and the like) with historical/touristy places, like castles etc. Different things, certainly the historical pois (especially the important/popular ones) would usually have a name:be as well.Regarding the switch, automa... | |
| 62 | 2017-09-13 13:52:19 UTC | Jay May | Proofreading is always easier than reading ;) So it is a good solution to make it automatically and switch. Especially that people like Georgij or me are not proficient in some OSM matters yet (like that addr tag) | |
| 63 | 2017-09-13 14:14:03 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | I'm for the automaticThen 2-3 days and on the map will be the Belarusian language. When it appears you will be able to click through all the settlements. To correct to the Belarusian language name: prefix addr: district addr province Also I ask to approve the name tag: en where the name of objec... | |
| 64 | 2017-09-13 14:16:49 UTC | Jay May | My opinion is that the English tag in that standard would be O.K., but the int_name tag should be in Belarusian Łacinka. | |
| 65 | 2017-09-13 15:33:07 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | The result should be reported on the page of the communities of neighboring countries and DWG. | |
| 66 | 2017-09-14 08:30:08 UTC | 4004 | a forum topic needs to be started on this, and approval from DWG would be nice, before doing anything | |
| 67 | 2017-09-14 09:03:56 UTC | 4004 | int_name is already filed correctly, in accordance with http://www.pravo.by/pdf/2007-159/2007-159%28027-028%29.pdf | |
| 68 | 2017-09-14 09:59:23 UTC | Jay May | O.K.guys. As soon as you start, please provide the link | |
| 69 | 2017-09-14 11:13:21 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | I will finalize now the Khotsinsk raion then along the border with the Russian Federation, then the area to the north of the Khotsinsk raion. | |
| 70 | 2017-09-14 11:23:46 UTC | 4004 | I would propose we wait until there is an agreement on how and when to proceed, and do not attempt anything before that | |
| 71 | 2017-09-14 11:26:40 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | how to do the proposed example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25076922 | |
| 72 | 2017-09-14 11:45:47 UTC | 4004 | aren't you rushing a bit Mykhailo? No agreement has been reached, no DWG approval granted, and it was supposed to be centralized and auto, no "regional tests" | |
| 73 | 2017-09-14 12:29:56 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | This format I provided earlier in this discussion. Therefore, we are informed. If something causes you suspicion, express ideas. | |
| 74 | 2017-09-14 12:34:14 UTC | Ambush | At the ByOSM Telegram chat we decided to have a meeting to discuss all the technical details, tools and other before doing any automated changes.Welcome everyone who wants to join this discussion, t.me/byosm | |
| 75 | 2017-09-14 12:35:08 UTC | 4004 | "We" might be informed, but this is not enough to start implementing changes, and certainly not by doing it on your own in one place."Мы" тут, может быть, и в курсе, но этого недостаточно, чтобы начинать что-то меня... | |
| 76 | 2017-09-14 12:51:47 UTC | 4004 | @Ambush could the osm forum be a better place? | |
| 77 | 2017-09-14 12:53:16 UTC | LLlypuk82 | You are welcome http://openstreetmap.by/ | |
| 78 | 2017-09-14 12:57:09 UTC | 4004 | that's the renderer that uses name:be if it exists | |
| 79 | 2017-09-15 00:41:52 UTC | yaugenka | Until it is completely agreed to change the current local convention, it must be observed! All changes have been reverted. | |
| 80 | 2017-09-15 06:26:42 UTC | Георгий Ильин | Jaugenka, I've just gone through the threads of various discussions this morning and you wrote "ничего не трогаем" ("we don't touch anything"). Thus, nobody allowed you to revert any changes, especially given the fact other multilingual names and wikipedia data hav... | |
| 81 | 2017-09-15 06:33:21 UTC | Jay May | Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?????????????????? Jauhenka deleted all the changes we had all made from the very beginning! As you said Georgij, multilingual changes, but even road changes! I was Jauhenka was a reasonable person, but I'm afraid what one of the guys told me is right: he is just trying to gain ... | |
| 82 | 2017-09-15 07:45:59 UTC | yaugenka | Fist of all, all of you were warned several times in this thread not to make any changes while the discussion is going on. Secondly, for now only renamings of settlements and admin boundaries have been reverted. I'm yet to analyse what else you have renamed. | |
| 83 | 2017-09-15 07:49:00 UTC | mOlind | Вот только не надо брать на себя святую миссию все откатывать. Это сильно пахнет вандализмом и может закончится баном. Я не оправдываю тех, кто полез переименовыват... | |
| 84 | 2017-09-15 07:54:17 UTC | mOlind | Как я вижу ситуацию на настоящий момент: Переименование будет. Будет по всей стране и в автоматизированном режиме. Ни одно название на русском не пострадает. Все бу... | |
| 85 | 2017-09-15 07:55:03 UTC | mOlind | Кто очень хочет начать переименовывать - вносите name:be, где их нету. Они не потеряются и будут использованы в последующем для name. | |
| 86 | 2017-09-15 08:58:28 UTC | Jay May | @yaugenka: O.K. There is an enormous confusion here with people asking to change manually while people discuss about changing automatically, people asking to wait for the automatic change, and people who don't want any change. Nevertheless, that doesn't change the fact that no one gave you the autho... | |
| 87 | 2017-09-15 09:45:17 UTC | 4004 | >Кто очень хочет начать переименовывать - вносите name:be, где их нету. Они не потеряются и будут использованы в последующем для name+1 to that (your app is nice btw).Translation: those who want ... | |
| 88 | 2017-09-15 10:07:33 UTC | 4004 | Oh, and here is a translation checkerhttp://latlon.org/~alex73/vulicy.html | |
| 89 | 2017-09-15 14:32:59 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | 4004 : перестаньте пользуясь что не все грамотньіе технически вводить людей в заблуждение. Указанньіе на офруме проблемі являются вьідуманньіми лично Вами. Поповоду... | |
| 90 | 2017-09-15 14:43:00 UTC | 4004 | @Poliakoff Mykhailo: вы меня с кем то путаете? я никого в заблуждение не ввожу, и уж точно ничего не придумываю. последняя ссылка, которую я тут привел - ближе всего, из того, ... | |
| 91 | 2017-09-15 15:34:59 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | а как делаем -- оставляем name:be-tarask и дублируем в name:be? Или name be-tarask переделываем в name be. при этом надо учитыват ь что здесь одинаково то ест ька кбы транслитерация а сог... | |
| 92 | 2017-09-15 23:57:27 UTC | 4004 | Всем заинтересованным:-в первую очередь необходимо проверить, что name=name:ru для будущего перехода автоматом. Если name!=name:ru, проверить какой из вариантов соответствуе... | |
| 93 | 2017-09-16 13:57:18 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | Есть проблемное село в Хотимском раене Ново-Григорьевка. По белорусски не соотвествует русскому . Искать надо официальное название на белорусском или подтвержден... | |
| 94 | 2017-09-16 15:37:13 UTC | yaugenka | @Mykhailo, вам для справки. В одном районе может быть несколько нп с одним названием. Если они отличаются типом (поселок, деревня, снп) то тип нужно обязательно указать в ... | |
| 95 | 2017-09-16 17:24:43 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | Изучите правки мои в Хоцінскам раёне. Все о чем вы пишите сделано мною изначально кроме сельсовета . Сейчас заново перегребаю район чтоб всем поставить сельсоветы | |
| 96 | 2017-09-17 17:01:28 UTC | yaugenka | Всем НП проставлять сельсовет большой надобности нету. Речь только о тех, у которых повторяется название в рамках одного района. | |
| 97 | 2017-09-18 05:40:27 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | то что вы предлагаете, превратить карту в порнографию. Тег используется или нет. Предстоит много подготовительной работы . И нет времени тратить времени на изучени... | |
| 98 | 2017-09-18 06:36:40 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | Яугенка всвязи с тем что іВовік занимается занимаеться расизмом ксенофобией и дискриминацией белорусского языка | |
| 99 | 2017-09-19 21:36:11 UTC | yaugenka | @Mykhailo, переименовывая addr:* и name:prefix на белорусский вы ломаете существующие программы. Откатывайте свои правки! | |
| 100 | 2017-09-20 08:25:34 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | Праблема Беларусі я бачу не ў сферы тэхналогій, у у тым, што ў кіраўніцтве ўсіх інтэрнэт-праектаў сядзяць людзі якія атрымліваюць дадатковыя матэрыяльныя ўзнагаро... | |
| 101 | 2017-09-20 08:37:15 UTC | mOlind | И обсуждение скатилось в флуд. Отписываюсь. | |
| 102 | 2017-09-20 09:43:36 UTC | 4004 | собственно как и в телеграме. что то менять никто не договаривался | |
| 103 | 2017-09-20 11:48:49 UTC | Jay May | @4004 Which is why I asked for people in Telegram "where are we going" because it is such a mess that it's hard for everyone to get what we should do.@Mykhailo @Yaugenka - STOP! | |
| 104 | 2017-09-20 21:24:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi all - Andy from the Data Working Group here. A couple have people have mentioned the ongoing arguments about language names in Belarus to us, and we'd like to do what we can to help. Obviously we're somewhat aware of the history here (and I've read the various numbers, some conflicting, on https... | |
| 105 | 2017-09-21 06:25:22 UTC | Jay May | Hi Andy. I've already sent such pics around a week ago. Please ask your colleague Frederik Ramm. In case you need them again, I can send them once more :)In short, asI had already told, toponyms are usually in Belarusian (cities, towns, villages, rivers, lakes...) while commercial names are most... | |
| 106 | 2017-09-21 13:38:55 UTC | LLlypuk82 | Stop, guys. What about our local agreement which was reached in same time as road signs was already in belorussian?Nothing is changed still. There is no reason to avoid the agreement. Photos have no sense in this case. | |
| 107 | 2017-09-22 05:36:58 UTC | Jay May | The local agreement was perhaps good in a certain context back in 2009. But the context has changed. | |
| 108 | 2017-09-24 10:06:56 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | To improve an electronic geographical map ONLY on signboards confirms the Belarussian WIKI-RULEhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Belarus:%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%82_%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%... | |
| 109 | 2017-09-28 19:34:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info, I've just posted this to the BE forum:https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=665838#p665838All feedback (from everyone who hasn't already commented) gratefully received. | |
| 110 | 2017-10-01 09:33:27 UTC | Maturi0n | I think the most important factor here should be what the local OSM community wants. People from other countries (Poland, Ukraine, Russia, etc) shouldn't dictate the Belarusian community which language they use as their main mapping language. If they agreed to use Russian, this should be respected. ... | |
| 111 | 2017-10-02 06:07:55 UTC | Jay May | @Maturi0n - I’m aware your heart beats more for the Russian language to be left, but this is not a matter of the local community wanting or not wanting something (and anyway most of the guys who discuss with us do support the Belarusian language or a full ground truth rule). OSM is neither a l... | |
| 112 | 2017-10-02 08:33:13 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | Now the rule according to signs "decides at the earth" works or not. Or the precedent which will do to other countries by a push is created, the fact that there is a wish. Especially it is dangerous to territories of the conflicts where the tomahawk of wars of changes is dug. The Belarusia... | |
| 113 | 2017-10-02 08:39:52 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | in Russian Сейчас решаеться правило по знакам "на земле " работает или нет. Или создается прецедент, который будет толчком другим странам делать , то что хочется. О... | |
| 52438334 by seyha sareth | 1 | 2017-09-28 10:07:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello.Can you explain what these "viewpoints" that you have added here are?People have tried and failed to contact you previously about this ( http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4139826 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1099 ) so please do reply.Bes... |
| 2 | 2017-09-28 10:08:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | สวัสดี.คุณสามารถอธิบายว่า "มุมมอง" เหล่านี้ที่คุณได้เพิ่มเข้าไปได้คืออะไร?ผู้คนพยายามและไม่สามารถติ... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-28 17:19:47 UTC | andi9876 | Dear, please not again, reverted aleady. | |
| 49524090 by NorthIsland | 1 | 2017-09-27 11:41:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - here I think you've merged a bit of canal into a lock https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500381672/history so that the ref now applies to a huge length of canal. |
| 52400509 by 张伟民 | 1 | 2017-09-27 01:09:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Er - not only does https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4792387396 not have a Chinese name signed on it the actual name used here ("York Chocolate Factory") is actually incorrect. |
| 52400667 by 张伟民 | 1 | 2017-09-27 01:05:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've never seen any Chinese signage on McArthur Glen York!https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56748281 |
| 52370342 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-09-27 00:58:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | The wikipedia and wikidata entries on http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2127054 look like the apply to the whole route (as far as Santiago de Compostela) not just this section of it near Mulhouse. |
| 2 | 2017-09-27 01:02:08 UTC | nyuriks | I agree, and this will be part of the overall cleanup as described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Improvement_Tasks#Duplicate_tags_on_a_relation_and_its_members - lets discuss it there on the talk page, because discussions on changesets are harder to track and consolidate. | |
| 52399788 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-09-27 00:12:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you want to perform a mechanical edit on OSM data then, as pointed out previously, you need to follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct . You are not doing this. |
| 2 | 2017-09-27 00:15:08 UTC | nyuriks | SomeoneElse, I think you are not being fair or impartial. I have reviewed every single change in this edit - they are done manually, one by one, not mechanically. This is very different from massive wikidata tag upload. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-27 00:33:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'd spend a few more characters spent in the comment explaining what you're doing would be helpful, not just "found with tinyurl" (link does not load for me; presumably it needs Javascript).Explain what the problem is - for example in the case of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/480708... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-27 00:38:14 UTC | nyuriks | Thanks, this is a valid feedback. I should make my comments more detailed. | |
| 44201253 by nyuriks | 1 | 2016-12-17 13:38:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Is the name of 117730 correct? It was last edited by a user who changed it from what I thought it was called. |
| 2 | 2017-09-26 23:57:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | For completeness, I fixed 117730 a while back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45037487 (the problem was unrelated to this edit, or to wikidata). | |
| 52008692 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-09-26 21:41:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,The wikidata entry that you added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2715516561/history seems to be for the brand, not for this particular object in OSM?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-09-26 21:44:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also, the bus stop https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4942536695/history has had a wikidata link added to the network operator. Did you not do any basic sanity checking on the data your changing here (how many _bus stops_ have their own wikipedia page, seriously?) | |
| 3 | 2017-09-26 22:02:25 UTC | nyuriks | 1) correct - when doing semi-automated changes, it is not a good practice to change multiple things at once, because in case of a mistake, the partially-automated and partially-manual changes are hard to undo (wastes a lot of effort). So step one is to add matching wikidata item, just as described ... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-26 22:04:36 UTC | nyuriks | 2) same logic - bus stops should have neither wikipedia nor wikidata tags, but use network:wiki* tags instead. Same thing - now that these objects are trackable, they can be converted to network as well. Performing just one task is much safer for the stability of the data. I can move all bus stops f... | |
| 5 | 2017-09-26 23:31:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Do please ensure that you read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct before any future mechanical edits. Don't just have a bit of a chat on the talk@ list, ignore all criticism, and do it anyway. | |
| 6 | 2017-09-27 00:13:31 UTC | nyuriks | Please be consistent. I plan to fix it as requested in the original comment. The fix is semi-mechanical - I will find all objects that fit criteria, review them and edit them. You are welcome to re-read the talk and participate in the discussion. Also all concerns were answered, with the possible ... | |
| 52341792 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-09-25 08:12:33 UTC | Rom1 | Hi, i don't agree with some of these modifications. Example : http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4469858091/history where you added a wikidata tag althought already exists the tag brand:wikidata (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata#brand:wikidata.3D.2A)Thanks for the corre... |
| 2 | 2017-09-25 17:41:33 UTC | nyuriks | Rom1, I agree - wikidata should not be set for a place of business that is a chain - e.g. Mc Donalds. As discussed in the @talk, this is just the first step that allows rapid search for all such places. The next step is to move all wikipedia and wikidata tags to brand:* for the chains, as well as ot... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-25 21:12:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | @nyuriks whereabouts was this mechanical edit discussed? | |
| 4 | 2017-09-25 21:40:01 UTC | nyuriks | https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-September/078720.html | |
| 5 | 2017-09-26 00:28:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | That doesn't say "I'm going to add lots of links that I know are wrong", which is what is being complained about here.In particular, it doesn't address concerns raised in that thread e.g. at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-September/078756.html (incidentally similar... | |
| 6 | 2017-09-26 05:35:58 UTC | nyuriks | I have reverted all of the relations and nodes that contained "#" in their "wikipedia" tag. I put together some thoughts on how wikipedia/wikidata should be validated and improved - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Improvement_Tasks | |
| 7 | 2017-09-26 23:22:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | You haven't addressed the places where you've added wikidata entries in error; the very first issue raised on this changeset discussion. | |
| 8 | 2017-09-26 23:34:56 UTC | nyuriks | SomeoneElse, I posted about it to the @talk about an hour ago, please take a look. Once community agrees that this is ok, I will fix them all. Without it, it would be a partial fix for just a few instances. | |
| 52002597 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-09-26 21:22:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81776419/history you've moved "operator:wikipedia" to "brand:wikipedia". You've said in the changeset comment that "McDonalds is a brand"; but McDonalds runs a mixed franchise model and is the operator of a significant numbe... |
| 2 | 2017-09-26 22:07:02 UTC | nyuriks | I do not, and this might have been a mistake. I will contact the original authors to find out. | |
| 52388001 by Fingrmouse | 1 | 2017-09-26 16:07:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Fingrmouse and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I think something's gone a bit wrong at least up near:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31699323#map=18/53.13117/-1.03334&layers=CThe Southwell Trail relation was composed of several different parts, some of whicj were former railway and some of... |
| 2 | 2017-09-26 16:18:11 UTC | Fingrmouse | The Southwell Trail is entirely based on an abandoned railway - there's no section of the trail doesn't run along an old rail route. The main West-Southeast route was part of the Midland Railway and the most northerly section near Bilsthorpe was where it transitioned into LM&SR / LNER routes. Th... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-26 16:32:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | The northern bit (just south of the Car park in Bilsthorpe) is a bit to the west of where the main rail lines were I think - see https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=18&lat=53.131153&lon=-1.033118 . Obviously it's a bit tricky here - bridleways and railways are linear feature... | |
| 52384970 by jbmaps | 1 | 2017-09-26 13:38:09 UTC | GinaroZ | Hi, this section is already part of the John Muir Way relation and therefore does not need a name https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/49215#map=13/55.9970/-2.6103 |
| 2 | 2017-09-26 14:57:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just for info - a couple of ways of seeing long distance paths like this: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=12!55.9982!-2.6546 and https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=14&lat=55.99511&lon=-2.6278 . | |
| 52295779 by andy mackey | 1 | 2017-09-24 10:53:37 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Hello andy mackey. Do you searched for http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_bookcase ? ;-) |
| 2 | 2017-09-24 10:54:08 UTC | Harald Hartmann | btw `old-phone-box` would be a new (and so far unkown) key. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-25 21:18:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | "building" is sometimes used to indicate an old phone box - http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4588450555 . | |
| 4 | 2017-09-26 04:53:49 UTC | Harald Hartmann | @andy mackey: have you ever read the wiki mentioned above? so i've expected that you change it from `amenity=library` to `amenity=public_bookcase` and from old_phone_box to `public_bookcase:type=phone_box`. Or is it a really a library? | |
| 52325348 by ain albaraha | 1 | 2017-09-24 18:28:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527244266#map=16/24.7647/43.8673 is? You've added it as "coastline" here which seems unlikely.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-09-24 18:29:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | مرحبا ومرحبا بكم في خريطة الشارع المفتوح!هل يمكنك شرح ما هو https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527244266#map=16/24.7647/43.8673؟ لقد أضفته ك "ساحل" هنا يبدو غير محتمل.تحياتي الحارة،أندي | |
| 3 | 2017-09-25 06:02:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Please understand that Way 527116798 is a duplication of highway 411. | |
| 52299954 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-09-24 10:24:49 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Hello SomeoneElse. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5124076913 you have tagged `cradt` instead of `craft`, right? #typo |
| 2 | 2017-09-24 10:49:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks | |
| 24785657 by chillly | 1 | 2017-09-22 23:57:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that some of the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/60263383/history should perhaps be adjacent rather than on the crossing? |
| 52213585 by andi2911 | 1 | 2017-09-21 22:50:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Erm - you perhaps ought to have a read of the page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories in the OSM wiki :) |
| 2 | 2017-09-22 08:44:54 UTC | andi2911 | Oh ok, well I haven't started with the european road network relation, which is already quite big. Ok, then group it as you wish :) | |
| 48327539 by Jay May | 1 | 2017-09-21 13:31:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | For the avoidance of any doubt - Google Streetview isn't a valid source for OSM (the licence is incompatible). Obviously you may be mapping things from local knowledge here (and just saying "they really do exist; you can look at GSV if you don't believe me!"), and this data has been delet... |
| 2 | 2017-09-22 05:41:32 UTC | Jay May | Hi Andy. I’ve already been acknowledged with this fact a couple of months ago, after what I stopped using GSV for OSM immediately; but thanks for your reminder. Kind regards. Jerry | |
| 3 | 2017-09-22 05:42:45 UTC | Jay May | P.S.: in this case I hadn’t used GSV, but I wrote that because one specific user from LT kept deleting my changes and I was angry... | |
| 52157642 by ctjuggler | 1 | 2017-09-18 21:30:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for fixing! |
| 52136728 by Ultimate lore | 1 | 2017-09-18 13:53:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Ultimate lore,You've deleted two long paths that are still visible on the imagery here. Can you explain what the problem with them was?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2017-09-18 13:53:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | 你好极了，您已经删除了在这里的图像上仍然可见的两条漫长的路径。 你能解释一下他们的问题吗？最好的祝福，Andy Townsend，代表OSM的数据工作组。 | |
| 52135809 by andi2911 | 1 | 2017-09-18 09:33:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello andi2911,In this changeset and most other recent ones you've not used any changeset comment. Adding a changeset comment allows other mappers to see why you've changed what you've changed. As you can see from http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=234298960 the objects here have political... |
| 2 | 2017-09-18 09:35:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hallo andi2911,In diesem änderung und den meisten anderen neueren hast du keine änderung kommentiert. Hinzufügen eines Changeet-Kommentars erlaubt anderen Mappern zu sehen, warum Sie geändert haben, was Sie geändert haben. Wie Sie von http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?... | |
| 52106174 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-09-17 16:05:35 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Hello SomeoneElse. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525251037 there are some typos: `maxsspeed` and `surce:name` ;-) #newkey #typo |
| 2 | 2017-09-17 16:09:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! | |
| 43749373 by nyuriks | 1 | 2016-11-18 02:10:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I think that something has gone wrong here. You've set the wikidata ID of both http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/195384 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/88077 to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q23098 .They're different entities on the ground. Can you explain how you actually ... |
| 2 | 2016-11-18 02:13:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Likewise http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/957520 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/957519 have been assigned the same wikidata ID. In this case should they perhaps share one relation that has the same wikidata ID? | |
| 3 | 2016-11-18 03:06:28 UTC | nyuriks | SomeoneElse, thanks, good catch. I'm trying to get the Wikipedia and Wikidata tags in sync. Seems that the Wikipedia tag have been set to an identical value on both. I will investigate - maybe only one of them should have it? | |
| 4 | 2016-11-18 03:15:11 UTC | nyuriks | SomeoneElse, I fixed the first one - it should have had a different Wikidata ID, as well as a different (more prescise) Wikipedia link. http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/195384 I cannot figure out why the second pair have identical WP and WD links, without being identical. The WP article doesn'... | |
| 5 | 2016-11-18 14:08:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - the Administrative Derbyshire's wikidata link looks OK (the sv:wikipedia page looks a bit rubbish, but we'll gloss over that - a wikipedia problem, not an OSM issue).As things currently stand I don't think http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/957520 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/relat... | |
| 6 | 2016-11-18 19:14:01 UTC | nyuriks | Hi, thanks for looking into it!The first issue is really about Wikipedia vs Wikidata linking -- sometimes WP article covers both the village and civil parish, while WD item claims it is both, but it is really about just one meaning. Do we really want to link to both is an open question - IMO only ... | |
| 7 | 2016-11-18 21:45:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Re "Do we really want to link to both is an open question" it would probably make sense not to link to either if the thing that you're linking from in OSM is something else entirely. To be honest, I'm still struggling understand what I asked at the top - "what you're actually trying ... | |
| 8 | 2016-11-18 23:15:23 UTC | nyuriks | I posted a long reply to https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56436 but it is pending moderator approval. I tried to explain both my method and reasoning. I simply locked the volatile Wikipedia link as a Wikidata ID - I have not touched the objects that did not have a Wikipedia tag alrea... | |
| 9 | 2016-11-19 00:29:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I'm sure that the post will be approved shortly. | |
| 10 | 2016-11-19 01:00:36 UTC | nyuriks | SomeoneElse - https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618646#p618646 | |
| 11 | 2016-11-20 07:03:06 UTC | nyuriks | fixed two more dups - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43815558 - the rest (957519,957520 - Barnby Moor CP, and 1976182,4077796,1976184 European walking route E2 - seems legit. We don't need to have a perfect 1:1 between wikidata and osm - just like WP links, multiple objects in OSM can point... | |
| 12 | 2016-12-12 00:24:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's been over 3 weeks now - are you going to fix the errors in this changeset? Some examples noted above, but there are many others. | |
| 13 | 2016-12-12 10:02:07 UTC | nyuriks | SomeoneElse, yes, I am working on it. You can always reach me on IRC - "yurik". | |
| 14 | 2017-05-19 09:37:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Well, It's been over 5 months now - are you going to fix the errors in this changeset? The Dunham-on-Trent example is still wrong, but there are many others. | |
| 15 | 2017-09-16 09:06:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Actually, looks like someone's changed something in wikidata back in April - wikidata now says "village and civil parish". Barnby Moor still in 2 pieces though (wigh pre-exists this changeset). | |
| 16 | 2017-09-16 19:49:17 UTC | nyuriks | @SomeoneElse, I think it should be fixed differently - we should remove all tags except name, note, source, and type, and create a relation that has all the original tags with those two ways. | |
| 51964449 by StephaneP | 1 | 2017-09-13 14:17:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,If you're looking for somewhere to add test data, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you in future?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-09-13 14:24:28 UTC | StephaneP | Hi !Sorry ! I completely forgot to use a test server.My test was related to this discussion :http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/StephaneP/diary/42273Stéphane | |
| 51978723 by wambacher | 1 | 2017-09-12 17:04:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! |
| 51955857 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-09-12 14:02:06 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Hello SomeoneElse. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5099252990 you tagged `ahop=variety_store`, so i think this is a typo, right? #newkey #typo |
| 2 | 2017-09-12 14:38:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes thanks - fixed. | |
| 51913438 by kjon | 1 | 2017-09-11 15:44:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Is the definitely a deli (as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=deli?uselang=en-GB ) rather than the usual sandwich / other fresh food place? It's a while since I've walked past the door (it's a long way uphill from most of Matlock) but my recollection was more Sandwich-y?Best ... |
| 2 | 2017-09-11 20:09:02 UTC | kjon | Hi Andy, feel free to change if you think fast food suits better. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-12 12:04:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'll have a look the next time that I'm there. | |
| 51891607 by Walter Schlögl | 1 | 2017-09-11 15:17:14 UTC | maxerickson | Hi-This changeset accidentally moved a node of a building a long distance, something to watch out for. It ends up creating rendering artifacts across a wide area.http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ika-chan!/diary/42268 |
| 2 | 2017-09-11 15:27:42 UTC | tyr_asd | Now the restaurant is duplicated in Vienna:* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5009482079* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5009482081It's really strange that this happened at all. The two node ids differ only by 2, but it's not a single bitflip. Did you do something special with JOSM w... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-11 15:28:46 UTC | tyr_asd | PS: I couldn't help but notice that the comment on this changeset could be better. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments – your fellow mappers would appreciated that very much :) | |
| 4 | 2017-09-12 11:57:25 UTC | PlaneMad | Does JOSM not throw a warning for this? | |
| 5 | 2017-09-12 12:01:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | There's a ticket from 3 years ago: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/11215 (which is worth a read, just for a giggle). | |
| 6 | 2017-09-12 12:23:43 UTC | tyr_asd | I would assume that Walter did not intentionally move this node from Africa to Europe in this changeset: Walter seems to be an experienced user, and this changeset looks quite fine (adding a precise cuisine tag, teaking the coordinates slightly) if it wasn't affecting the wrong node. – I've as... | |
| 7 | 2017-09-13 18:42:21 UTC | Walter Schlögl | It seems to me that there is a bug in JOSM that could have moved this point that far, but I'm not sure how to identify such a bug. | |
| 51912752 by Władysław Komorek | 1 | 2017-09-12 11:28:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You may want to double-check the border here since I had to revert a couple of wikimapia-derived edits.Best Regards,Andy (Data Working Group) |
| 2 | 2017-09-12 11:35:29 UTC | Władysław Komorek | So far I don't see any problems. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-12 11:43:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Neither did I (though there's a hole in the Indian boundary that I mentioned at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=663343#p663343 ), but I thought I'd better let you know just in case. | |
| 51950795 by xinduqiao | 1 | 2017-09-12 10:34:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello xinduqiao,Can you explain what boundary changes you made here and what the source was?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2017-09-12 10:34:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | 新都桥你好，你能解释一下你在这里做了什么边界变化以及什么来源？最好的祝福，Andy Townsend，代表OSM的数据工作组。 | |
| 3 | 2017-09-12 10:49:05 UTC | xinduqiao | I based on the line of control from Wikimapia, between India and China. In fact the boundary is an unfixed line. The official map only marked an approximate line which is not suitable for the situation of LoC. Therefore, I try to find an exact shape of the boundary of current state. | |
| 4 | 2017-09-12 10:58:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi xinduqiao - thanks for the reply. We can't use wikimapia as a source, unfortunately, since that is often just traced from Google - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikimapia#Putting_OSM_data_into_Wikimapia_is_not_allowed for more details.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 51697271 by confusedbuffalo | 1 | 2017-09-07 18:39:30 UTC | chillly | This looks like an undiscussed mass edit. |
| 2 | 2017-09-08 16:03:31 UTC | confusedbuffalo | I can see why you say that, but I felt that this was acceptable. Firstly, it's only changing the tags, not keys.Secondly, I feel that it is important to have phone numbers callable internationally, particularly with the increasing use of OSM data in smartphone apps. When travelling, I expect to be... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-08 16:29:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | For clarity re "When travelling, I expect to be able to tap on a phone number and for it to work, without me having to enter the country code at that time", you can. If you're roaming on another country's network you can just dial local numbers with no country code, just as if you were di... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-08 17:05:05 UTC | chillly | Your premise explaining why the international code is wrong. You can dial any number in the UK using only the area code (known as the STD code in the UK) and the local number. If you visit the UK with a roaming phone you still do not need the international code (+44). You only need that if you are c... | |
| 5 | 2017-09-11 20:09:21 UTC | confusedbuffalo | I hadn't realised that about dialling numbers | |
| 51848903 by kimerec | 1 | 2017-09-08 16:00:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!This is just a quick note to let you know, in case you're not already aware that the Morrocan border here is one of the more "sensitive" ones in OSM - there have been politically motivated attempts to change the borders of Morocco in the past to include... |
| 46523754 by WernerP | 1 | 2017-03-02 15:30:17 UTC | SK53 | Can you please stop needlessly changing Bing to bing. It totally obscures other changes which you are making. You're changeset comments are not adequate to understand what you are doing. Please discuss this type of edit with the local community first. |
| 2 | 2017-03-02 15:37:15 UTC | SK53 | Can you please stop these edits immediately you are creating bad data https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369383412/history | |
| 3 | 2017-03-02 22:29:57 UTC | Polarbear | Besides the Bing issue, you are messing up county boundaries. Boundaries might be legally defined by a stream or river. Look at this example:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71656812 was serving both as a county boundary (admin_level 6) in a boundary relation, and a waterway. It might not be idea... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-07 02:18:15 UTC | Polarbear | Fivemiletown edits 46526305+46525145+46523754 reverted in 46637434 and selectively restored in CS 46637891, 46639210, 46639252, 46639371, 46639474 | |
| 5 | 2017-09-08 12:27:50 UTC | KDDA | Can this please be put back to how it was before. The waterway is NOT called Tyrone / Fermanagh | |
| 6 | 2017-09-08 12:37:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | @KDDA - there are only 2 bits called "Tyrone / Fermanagh" left - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490542618 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369383412/history - it's probably easiest just to change them manually. | |
| 7 | 2017-09-08 21:43:03 UTC | Polarbear | There was one of WernerP's changeset still on my todo list from the series of repairs above, which were done manually. Let me check that manually at daylight tomorrow if that is the reason for your question. | |
| 8 | 2017-09-09 08:38:09 UTC | Polarbear | Checked my records, seems my unfinished repair is in Ballinasloe/RoI, not the Fivemiletown/NI here. Anyway, it seems that for w369383412, I had removed the Tyrone / Fermanagh name from WernerP's edits in March.On the other hand, for w490542618 and w261564260, KDDA himself added waterway=stream t... | |
| 9 | 2017-09-09 08:42:28 UTC | Polarbear | The names of the counties and the admin levels are in the respective border relations. Thus the border way as a member (waterway or anything else) can have its natural name or no name. Anything else might be in a note tag. | |
| 51819371 by Ultimate lore | 1 | 2017-09-07 19:10:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Ultimate lore and welcome to OpenStreetMap,You've changed the boundary tags on http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3964691/history from disputed to administrative. Can you please explain the reason for the change?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2017-09-07 19:10:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | 你好极了，欢迎来到OpenStreetMap，您已经更改了边界标记http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3964691/历史从争议到行政。 你能解释一下这个变化的原因吗？最好的祝福，Andy Townsend，代表OSM的数据工作组。 | |
| 11941060 by michaelinredhill | 1 | 2017-09-06 19:25:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I think that something has gone wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/486594656/history . The name of that now says Patterdale, and it used to say Aira Force, but I think that Aira Force is correct because that is where it is.Maybe you accidentally copied data from https://www.openst... |
| 51754267 by Derby45 | 1 | 2017-09-06 18:03:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I don't think I'd describe the former Millers Dale station is any sort of "railway=station". That would suggest to people that they might be able to get a train from there! Previously it was "railway=station_site" which is not ideal, but at least it isn't misleading!Mayb... |
| 51757003 by 终极绝杀 | 1 | 2017-09-05 18:27:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!You've made a change to some International borders here that seems to have caused some problems. Can you explain what you were trying to change?The way that we map borders in OpenStreetMap is described at http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTer... |
| 2 | 2017-09-05 18:27:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | 您好，欢迎来到OpenStreetMap！你已经改变了这里的一些国际边界，似乎造成了一些问题。 你能解释一下你想改变什么吗？我们在OpenStreetMap中映射边框的方式在http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf中有描... | |
| 51735645 by mennovdzee | 1 | 2017-09-05 08:32:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 51715880 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-09-04 11:27:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - wrong account - should have been "SomeoneElse_Revert". The "note" here "VERY UNFINISHED NEEDS REFINING TTO WALL LINES etc" was added by a previous mapper of the Heathland here and it's actually considerably _more_ finished than the series reverted in N Wales. T... |
| 51698005 by 929q82773 | 1 | 2017-09-04 08:11:33 UTC | jaap de vries | je hebt overal Geen ingevuld, dit is niet de bedoeling, zie ook mijn PB of deze link http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 10:38:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | I stayed at De Witte Schuur about 20 years ago - back then it just called itself just "De Witte Schuur" rather than "Zorgboerderij De Witte Schuur", but I guess that might have changed. | |
| 51706256 by Bman | 1 | 2017-09-04 08:18:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Would it be possible to explain what the change was here? "clean up special characters" doesn't really say what was changed and why.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 09:10:24 UTC | glglgl | Besides, a change covering the whole world is kind of frowned upon. Better create separate changesets for each region. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-04 16:55:34 UTC | Bman | @SomeOneElse, the changes were to remove whitespace characters like newlines, carriage returns and tab. | |
| 4 | 2017-09-04 16:58:17 UTC | Bman | @glglgl, good point. Sorry about that. | |
| 51694616 by Geoff571 | 1 | 2017-09-03 21:54:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Which router is it that requires a "bicycle=yes" on a gate in order to route through it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 51682044 by TR42 | 1 | 2017-09-03 08:48:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello TR42,In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51621108 I tried to explain the problems associated with "colouring in" large swathes as heathland without paying attention to the detail. You're still doing it here - if you look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.82126/-3.4... |
| 2 | 2017-09-03 11:44:40 UTC | trigpoint | I would also like to add that last time I was on The Berwyns it was not an area I would describe as heath, it is mostly moorland. As a local I find it quite concerning that my local area is being mismapped in this way.Phil | |
| 3 | 2017-09-04 10:39:57 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51714984 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of poor-quality edits following discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-September/020576.html | |
| 51665399 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-09-02 10:27:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Sustrans have the 680 cycle route as the Monsal Trail https://www.sustrans.org.uk/ncn/map/route/route-680. I've not seen that signage, but have seen signage where Sustrans don't have it down in Matlock. |
| 51209528 by JamesKingdom | 1 | 2017-09-01 09:33:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi James,You may want to revisit some of the deletions in here - the DWG's had to revert the offending duplicates added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51210673 et al (see the discussion in there which also suggests a possible Google source of the names).Best Regards,Andy Townsend, ... |
| 51621108 by TR42 | 1 | 2017-08-31 17:42:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi TR42,In here http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6999982 is quite large. You've tagged it as "natural=heath" but then added a note "using heath tag to represent fell, fell tag doesn't do anything.". Please don't tag one thing incorrectly as another just to create a parti... |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 10:39:56 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51714984 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of poor-quality edits following discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-September/020576.html | |
| 51567307 by osm_fede | 1 | 2017-08-30 09:37:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,You've removed a couple of tags from http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/40581 - was that perhaps an accident?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-08-30 09:38:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Ciao,Hai rimosso un paio di tag da http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/40581 - era forse un incidente?I migliori saluti,Andy | |
| 3 | 2017-08-31 09:38:51 UTC | osm_fede | Not a mistake, the previous ruins are now a beautiful B&B named "Campi Elisi" | |
| 4 | 2017-08-31 09:44:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | It wasn't the B&B I was asking about, it was the administrative boundary relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/40581 . | |
| 5 | 2017-08-31 10:17:11 UTC | osm_fede | SORRY, not my intention to modify the administrative boundary relation. I want to modify only B&B and the name of the street "strada vicinale l'Eremitu". | |
| 6 | 2017-08-31 11:06:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | No problem - I see that they have just been restored - http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=51609472 - so all should be OK now. | |
| 51154155 by Gabriel Reynolds | 1 | 2017-08-22 16:44:31 UTC | RedGel | The way 42677505 that was a retail area was changed to a building as part of this change set. But it was an area that encompassed multiple buildings. |
| 2 | 2017-08-30 09:06:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | @RedGel do you need help undoing the problem changes here? This editor hasn't edited for 12 days; it's possible that they may not return.Best Regards, Andy | |
| 3 | 2017-08-30 12:10:36 UTC | RedGel | @SomeoneElse Hello Andy, yes please. Help would be much appreciated I'm still learning the ropes.Regards, Rob. | |
| 4 | 2017-08-30 15:38:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | OK, I've added a couple of buildings from imagery and changed the larger rectangle back to "landuse" (and stretched it a bit to include the car park). Does that look better now?Also do you know what the southeastern building is? Dunelm Mill is in the northwestern building - are there... | |
| 5 | 2017-08-30 19:25:38 UTC | RedGel | Looks good to me.That building is a Fludes Carpets and I'm sure it's a kitchen shop. Magnet? I drive past it every week and I can't remember. The next time I go past I'll make a note and add them in.Looking again at the changes made in this changeset. The following ways were changed from landu... | |
| 6 | 2017-08-30 19:52:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | I didn't do a revert, just looked at each of the new "buildings" and changed the most obviously wrong. 42677503 is just one building, but obviously a bit of tidy-up so that the shape matches better would be nice. 42677501 looks OKish (but is that Aldi to the northwest misplaced?). 22734... | |
| 7 | 2017-08-30 20:10:22 UTC | RedGel | Aldi is correct. The satellite imagery is out of date. The factory used to be Goldwells but it was knocked it down and they built Aldi in 2016. The industrial area needs changing to exclude the area used by Aldi. | |
| 51493886 by jb9991 | 1 | 2017-08-29 10:38:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 51426918 by Mirnamil | 1 | 2017-08-29 09:38:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is there really a convenience store with your name in Russia?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-08-29 09:38:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Merhaba,Rusya'da isminizle birlikte bir marketten gerçekten var mı?Saygılarımla,Andy | |
| 51272573 by hycart | 1 | 2017-08-20 09:43:51 UTC | hycart | This has not had the desired effect - apart from in JOSM. Will have to consider an alternative approach. |
| 2 | 2017-08-20 22:38:30 UTC | GinaroZ | What effect were you looking to achieve? | |
| 3 | 2017-08-21 08:42:00 UTC | hycart | I wand the name of the wooded areas to appear on the map (Lochend Woods), either in one or multiple places. This only happens with the Humanitarian variant of the map. What is shown in JOSM editing mode would also be fine. This must be a common situation, I can see names for landuse/forest being ... | |
| 4 | 2017-08-28 14:00:41 UTC | hycart | I see the name has appeared now, perhaps you have to wait some time for the lower-resolution tiles that have these. I really wish there was VM setup to accept updates and perform localised tile rendering exactly as the OSM site does that people could use in order to check this sort of thing. | |
| 5 | 2017-08-29 08:29:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you're familiar with installing a VM yourself you could try https://switch2osm.org/manually-building-a-tile-server-16-04-2-lts/ .To add "test stuff" to a local rendering you'd need to save a .osc and apply that as a "change". | |
| 37982706 by Warofdreams | 1 | 2017-08-27 13:19:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've restored the tags on the Barrack from http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/393538626/history |
| 51285516 by observer | 1 | 2017-08-24 15:18:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I suspect that people here might have been trying to say "this is a barber's and not a hairdresser's". If you look at the subtags for hairdresser you'll see that it's often tagged that way: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/hairdresser . Mechanical edits to OSM do need to be di... |
| 2 | 2017-08-27 08:03:19 UTC | observer | Hi,I think that it is best to revert this edit. Hope I can fix this myself.Regards. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-27 08:07:38 UTC | observer | "or do we need to revert these changes?"Please do so, I can 't find out how I can do that from here. My apologies for the inconvenience.Regards, observer | |
| 4 | 2017-08-27 08:37:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | No problem - done. | |
| 51415922 by kevjs1982 | 1 | 2017-08-26 12:48:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Is Carrington Street closed now as well? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169581775 is no access but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167053006 isn't restricted.I've not been there in a month (when Carrington Street was still open and stuff to the east was fenced off). |
| 51429803 by Mirnamil | 1 | 2017-08-25 13:11:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Mirnamil, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!You've changed a number of names in recent changesets, with a changeset comment of "100%". Please do use meaningful changeset comments - "100%" does not explain what you changed or why, or what the source was.For details on the ... |
| 2 | 2017-08-25 13:12:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Merhaba Mirnamil, OpenStreetMap'e hoş geldiniz!Son değişikliklerdeki bazı adları değiştirdiniz, "% 100" lik bir changeset yorumu ile.Lütfen anlamlı değişikliklerle ilgili yorumlar kullanın - "% 100", neyi değiştirdiğinizi veya nedenini veya kaynağı neyi a... | |
| 51369510 by route4uuser | 1 | 2017-08-24 15:26:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,This is a very large changeset with relatively few items in it. How can I see which objects in it are near me?Best Regards,Andy Townsend |
| 51357610 by John Griffin UK | 1 | 2017-08-24 15:23:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I'm guessing that perhaps http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139014661/history could do with an "amenity=funeral_directors" tag on it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 41447672 by Stefan de Konink | 1 | 2017-08-23 14:10:47 UTC | GerdP | Hi!Please review:highway=grass is not widely used, I assume you meant highway=footway + surface=grass? |
| 2 | 2017-08-23 16:25:13 UTC | Stefan de Konink | Nope, it is a routable surface, not a footway. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-23 16:28:31 UTC | GerdP | So maybe highway=service ? | |
| 4 | 2017-08-23 16:36:31 UTC | Stefan de Konink | No, highway=grass. | |
| 5 | 2017-08-23 16:40:13 UTC | GerdP | Well, the highway tag is used to map the importance of the road, not the surface.Why do you think that you have a special case here? | |
| 6 | 2017-08-23 16:50:24 UTC | Stefan de Konink | Because there is no road. | |
| 7 | 2017-08-23 16:54:00 UTC | Stefan de Konink | The hole purpose of having added these tags is the ability to route pedestrians over the camping place. Hence the highway tag is used on surfaces which form a graph. The highway=grass is not rendered. Don't do any harm, in the database, and should have been implicitly followed, sadly the OpenStreetM... | |
| 8 | 2017-08-23 17:03:52 UTC | GerdP | Sounds somehow crazy. A way that is not a road and should not be displayed as road should still be used like a road? | |
| 9 | 2017-08-23 17:08:46 UTC | Stefan de Konink | Exactly. The surface is a field of grass used for camping. While passing the surface in the middle moving to another campingfield is a highway activity. Don't want to render it on the map, do want to route over it. | |
| 10 | 2017-08-23 17:11:22 UTC | GerdP | What router supports this mapping? | |
| 11 | 2017-08-23 17:14:33 UTC | Stefan de Konink | OpenTripPlanner, RoutingKit, probably any router that can be configured to use tags. | |
| 12 | 2017-08-24 07:08:56 UTC | GerdP | So you tell the people who arrive at the camping to install this software and configure it just to find something like a trampoline? I can't believe that. Besides that I still think that the highway tag should not be used here. | |
| 13 | 2017-08-24 14:56:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info - "highway=grass" hasn't exactly troubled the scorers at taginfo:https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=highway%3Dgrass . It's only used in this one location. | |
| 14 | 2017-08-24 19:50:29 UTC | Stefan de Konink | I honestly don't care what you think. You are not familiair in the area, have not micromapped it, and the tagging is part of the openstreetmap database, and has not been used in rendering profiles.I don't care about scores too. It seems you are only trying to formalize tagging, but don't come wi... | |
| 15 | 2017-08-25 05:16:25 UTC | GerdP | A possible alternative may be highway=virtual It is also undocumented and not often used (64 times) but at least more self explaining,and I think it is used for the same purpose. | |
| 16 | 2017-08-25 12:32:24 UTC | Stefan de Konink | Thanks, this is a good suggestion. I would be happy to use it. | |
| 51388873 by Bokkote | 1 | 2017-08-24 13:10:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 46508220 by poschon | 1 | 2017-03-03 10:59:05 UTC | dieterdreist | This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment. See also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/057524.html |
| 2 | 2017-03-04 20:54:58 UTC | poschon | I seems to be, I was to fast. Please give me the feedback over PN. What did I do wrong?Poschon | |
| 3 | 2017-03-04 20:58:50 UTC | poschon | For the start:The basis for the import was http://dati.emilia-romagna.it/dataset/numerazione-civica-del-territorio-comunale--50f328b0/resource/fa3d040e-d4ea-4cdd-85c7-a83294fbeab0The licenc for all imported adresses is Creative Commons - CC0 1.0 | |
| 4 | 2017-03-04 21:14:16 UTC | poschon | Check the datas:I compared all the adresses between present in the openstreet and in the SET. After the import I checked all the adresses over http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ and corrected all doubel house numbers | |
| 5 | 2017-03-04 21:18:08 UTC | poschon | But now I see some of my adaptations of double house numbers are not present on official release. Positive think is: The server has all the corrections | |
| 6 | 2017-03-04 21:22:39 UTC | poschon | I prepared all the import to correct it. Every one can filter all house numbers for "Information = info". I have also the imported file on my computer and could send it to every one. | |
| 7 | 2017-03-05 14:03:41 UTC | dieterdreist | Hello Poschon, thank you for replying. The most important critique from the mailing list is that you didn't follow the import guidelines and didn't contact the local community, otherwise you would have learnt that there was already an established structure and guidelines for importing this data: ht... | |
| 8 | 2017-03-05 14:08:33 UTC | dieterdreist | also you should use a dedicated account for imports, especially if you are uploading a lot of stuff like you did. | |
| 9 | 2017-03-05 21:44:26 UTC | poschon | Hallo Martin,I see.I will the same: A great map for the world.Are you in the community "Emilia Romagna"?At the moment all my try to change something on the map is not visible. It seems that my account works partially.About the doubles address:At the moment over osmose... | |
| 10 | 2017-03-06 16:55:36 UTC | dieterdreist | Hello Poschon, there is still some discussion on the italian ML as you might have seen. I have told them that you are wiling to solve the few duplicates and that I have the impression you have understood now that there are import guidelines that have to be respected. Although the data doesn't requir... | |
| 11 | 2017-03-06 21:00:01 UTC | poschon | Hallo Martin, Grazie for this feedback.I did not get your formulation "Although the data doesn't require legally attribution (cc0) it would still have made sense to provide it (so others can see where the data came from)." What is exactly the requirement in this case about source?\... | |
| 12 | 2017-03-06 21:19:25 UTC | poschon | I stay in Modena for more as one year. I have big interest to increase the status of OSM in Modena. | |
| 13 | 2017-03-06 21:22:59 UTC | poschon | Sorry I miss understand you last comment. | |
| 14 | 2017-03-06 21:25:37 UTC | poschon | Then I will wait for the feedback. I follow the discussion in ML, but it is quite difficult to understand. The google translate help me a little. | |
| 15 | 2017-03-09 18:50:42 UTC | poschon | I see the first feedback about the quality:1.\tSome days ago I talked about invisible addresses. I mean the wrong format --> 2/A. At the moment there are 51 addresses with wrong format. There is no problem to solve it.2.\tNot existing houses: I can not imagen that one responsible/person f... | |
| 16 | 2017-03-15 11:05:45 UTC | dieterdreist | Hello Poschon, there have only been neutral or positive reactions regarding the import (a revert will likely not happen). You can go on with fixing the few duplicates (my preferences would be in doubt to favor the non-import version of the duplicates). Thank you,Martin | |
| 17 | 2017-03-15 11:08:24 UTC | dieterdreist | btw: why are you sure 2/A is the wrong format? It is a common housenumber scheme in italy. If search doesn't find this, we might have to improve the search. | |
| 18 | 2017-03-15 22:11:22 UTC | poschon | Hello Martin, Grazie for the feedback. I will follow the unwritten low in case of duplicates to delete the imported address. At the next time I will search more deeply for a community. My big mistake is: I looked just for Modena. The wiki side for Regio Emilia does not include the word Modena.... | |
| 19 | 2017-03-16 01:15:32 UTC | dieterdreist | the shortcomings of the search should be reported to Nominatim (the geocoding software on osm.org). Contacting the local community about the import: best way is probably to ask on the national mailing list, they can refer to a regional mailing list (if there is). There is also an international maili... | |
| 20 | 2017-03-16 08:58:07 UTC | Regina Phalange | Sorry for being late. I'm not much happy about this changeset, as I've seen the source in the past and I wasn't very amused about the quality. The house numbers are very often misplaced around the buildings, or even in the near buildings. If the general feeling is neutral though, I'm not going to in... | |
| 21 | 2017-03-17 10:47:36 UTC | dieterdreist | I think there is likely not a rule or if there is, it is not enforced, you can find different kind of 3/A, 3/a, 3a, 3A and there also are very frequent uses of the slash to make a list, e.g. 3/5/7 (for the house numbers 3 and 5 and 7) and there also are variants like 3/2 (which has to be read simila... | |
| 22 | 2017-03-18 12:54:56 UTC | poschon | ciao,the format for the numbers is important. I agree with you. Today I did a small walk around Modena. I saw just the Format <Number><Letter> without ”/”. Here are some pictures from plates and in upper left corner the position of this plate on the map:https://ownc... | |
| 23 | 2017-03-19 11:41:38 UTC | Regina Phalange | Ok I'm really sorry because you are totally right about the plates. However the "/" format is default when you talk about addresses, as you can see here https://www.paginegialle.it/serramenti-infissi-klimainfissi-modena , http://www.immobiliaredonatello.it/it/contatti.html and (not Modena ... | |
| 24 | 2017-08-22 10:12:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello poschon,What is the point of the "information=add" data that you have added to every node here? Were these tags discussed anywhere before the import took place?Best Regards,See also the very negative comments about this import at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-i... | |
| 50337899 by Tubk86 | 1 | 2017-08-22 08:09:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Was this import discussed anywhere? The tagging (e.g. "information=a" looks very wrong.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-09-12 16:56:02 UTC | daganzdaanda | I'm not sure it is an import... There seems to be a group of people who survey this area but don't yet know much about the tagging in OSM. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48894495 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50053772 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48989209 | |
| 46507527 by poschon | 1 | 2017-03-03 10:57:44 UTC | dieterdreist | This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment. |
| 2 | 2017-08-22 08:05:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello poschon,What is the point of the "information=add" data that you have added to every node here? What was the source of the import? Was it discussed anywhere?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 3 | 2017-08-22 08:06:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | @dieterdreist did you raise this anywhere else (one of the mailing lists, the DWG, etc.)? | |
| 4 | 2017-08-22 08:47:40 UTC | dieterdreist | IIRR this was discussed on talk-it and still IIRR approved post operam. | |
| 51276853 by Guppie35 | 1 | 2017-08-21 11:22:37 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51301060 where the changeset comment is: Revert wrong change by user Guppie35 of B 6n to A 36. You have not been in field. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=660305#p660305 |
| 2 | 2017-08-21 23:28:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Guppie35,Your changeset comments are all either "no comment" or as here "just wright". Neither of those really explains what you're trying to do and what the source was. Please do take the time to explain your changes - OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project - we ha... | |
| 46228176 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-08-21 14:36:06 UTC | GinaroZ | Isn't https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4694363660 better tagged as shop=opticians? |
| 2 | 2017-08-21 14:57:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | By a margin of 31k to 60, yes :) | |
| 51274759 by dcp | 1 | 2017-08-20 21:55:31 UTC | DaveF | HiWhy have you removed pub details from the polygon that represents the land operated by the pub (same as with the scheme for schools) & placed them on a building within the polygon boundary?Why have you created a MP relation which places the pub car park *outside* the premises of the land... |
| 2 | 2017-08-21 08:32:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Certainly the change here has broken all the renderers that I'm aware of - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7491197#map=19/51.35138/-2.09942 is completely confused, and https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=20&lat=51.3513518&lon=-2.099315 doesn't see the pub at all! | |
| 50212300 by zerpou | 1 | 2017-08-19 08:50:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi zerpou,Was this import discussed anywhere (as per the Import Guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines )?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-09-22 21:27:12 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52290172 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed import 50238127 which introduced lots of odd tags. Attempts to discuss with mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1458 et al. Since-edited objects lef... | |
| 49038461 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-08-18 18:39:35 UTC | HolgerJeromin | You have added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4881225653 with shop=car_wash (wrong tag)An amenity=car_wash was already there:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310603519Do i miss something? |
| 2 | 2017-08-18 19:32:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for letting me know. It is (or was when I was last there) genuinely two adjacent car washes. I'll fix the tag. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-18 19:45:30 UTC | HolgerJeromin | Thanks for your quick answer (and the fix :) | |
| 51210173 by Gabriel Reynolds | 1 | 2017-08-18 15:40:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also,What evidence do you have for the name of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16290716/history ? I live just down the road from there and have driven around it many times. Where is it signed?Best Regards,Andy |
| 51209997 by Gabriel Reynolds | 1 | 2017-08-18 15:34:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Where did you get the name "Pinxton Interchange" for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118554994 here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 51225429 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-08-18 13:12:03 UTC | pschonmann | Are you 100% sure, that mapper want use source key ?Reverting to bad key=values pair is not too good idea too. Surface=ground seems fine for me if its on golf |
| 2 | 2017-08-18 13:14:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Did you actually ask them what they meant? | |
| 3 | 2017-08-18 13:18:18 UTC | pschonmann | No, but surface=bing is nonsense, ive changed surface to right value thats fit to golf yard. Maybe grass will be more specific | |
| 4 | 2017-08-18 13:23:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Here a "nonsense" tag is useful, because it says that "someone tagged something incorrectly. Leaving that visible means that this and their other contributions will be looked at more closely.You don't know what the mapper wanted to record here, or actually you guessed wrong - in this... | |
| 5 | 2017-08-18 13:38:39 UTC | pschonmann | Ok, youre boss | |
| 51210119 by pschonmann | 1 | 2017-08-17 19:48:33 UTC | DaveF | Pulverized Ash?Instead of deleting could you have contacted the mapper(s) to ask? |
| 2 | 2017-08-18 07:30:36 UTC | ToniE | First guess: surface=paved or surface=paving_stones. "paved" is quite generic and should fit here? | |
| 3 | 2017-08-18 08:32:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've reverted this. Please ask the mapper what "pa" was a misspelling of in each case rather than just removing data from OSM. | |
| 51210167 by pschonmann | 1 | 2017-08-18 08:31:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Here you've removed the only useful information that was mapped. Don't do that. |
| 51210192 by pschonmann | 1 | 2017-08-18 08:21:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | The mapper presumably meant "source=bing" rather than "surface=ground" here. Please engage brain when fixing tags! |
| 51177405 by Harinder Burkhart | 1 | 2017-08-16 15:50:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Harinder Burkhart,What is the source for the population figure here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 51171354 by Carrie Weist | 1 | 2017-08-16 14:35:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what change you were trying to make here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 51166065 by schwall | 1 | 2017-08-16 11:58:43 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, you seem to have added a source:maxspeed with no maxspeed.Also GB:rural is meaningless, there is no such thing as a rural limit. We have a national speed limit and tag source:maxspeed as either gb_nsl_single or gb_nsl_dual.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-08-16 12:50:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info, the most used values are at http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/maxspeed%3Atype#values . | |
| 51142951 by vadp | 1 | 2017-08-15 15:14:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi vadp,Just so you're aware, there has been discussion on the talk-it list about whether Italian or compound Sardinian/Italian names should be used here - see for example https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2016-November/thread.html#56129 .Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-08-16 08:27:49 UTC | vadp | Hi Andy, No problem. I just feel that it's better to have one language per name tag otherwise it looks quite clumsy.As a matter of fact I did made some investigation beforehand. http://www.comune.olbia.ss.it/ doesn't even mention Terranoa as an alternative name (or Terranòa or Tarran&og... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-16 08:45:03 UTC | vadp | Actually, I see what you had meant: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Sardegna_.28Sardinia.29 . It's strange though that http://www.comune.olbia.ss.it doesn't follow these rules. But well, If it's an established practice, I'll amend the node.Cheers!Vadim | |
| 4 | 2017-08-16 09:36:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | There was actually quite a bit of discussion on the tail-it mailing list. There was talk of a wiki vote about names there, but I'm not sure if that ever happened. | |
| 5 | 2017-08-16 12:55:17 UTC | vadp | This "slashed" notation does look quite weird and unreadable. Strange that in Corsica, for example, they do not follow this pattern, although they seem to be even more keen of their Corsican names.Never mind though. I'm not going to rename every place in Sardinia :) | |
| 48088139 by VlIvYur | 1 | 2017-08-14 18:38:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489053247 isn't what people would normally describe as a tree row - looks more like a big hedge. |
| 2 | 2017-08-14 18:44:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489053234 doesn't look like a fence but a wall, and it isn't that shape. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489053236 is that shape, but also appears to be a wall not a fence. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-14 18:46:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489053343 doesn't look like a driveway - it just appears to be a parking area in someone's front garden. | |
| 4 | 2017-08-14 21:09:14 UTC | VlIvYur | 489053247 looks like a tree row, because fence/wall in the meter to the N489053234, 489053236 maybe there are walls. Shadow is strange, looks like this barrier consists of 4 pieces with height of 0.5-1m, and another one from the house to the next roof perpendicularly489053343 leads to house, &qu... | |
| 47952488 by VlIvYur | 1 | 2017-08-14 18:36:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Do you have any evidence is a fence now? The imagery would suggest that it isn't one. |
| 50881838 by VlIvYur | 1 | 2017-08-14 18:28:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | By what logic do you make https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7449020 a farmyard? It just looks like a field with some pigs in it to me. |
| 2 | 2017-08-14 23:36:51 UTC | VlIvYur | I'd confuse land and yard | |
| 51108132 by oormilavinod | 1 | 2017-08-14 11:21:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks |
| 51098376 by oormilavinod | 1 | 2017-08-14 11:11:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello - here you've deleted something that was previously a school - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23646951/history . Was that correct or should that be reverted?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-08-14 11:21:14 UTC | oormilavinod | hello, thank you so much for point his out. i have reverted the last change to yours . have a nice day :) | |
| 51033756 by Lydie Domínquez Soliz | 1 | 2017-08-14 09:26:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Lydie Domínquez Soliz and welcome to OSM!Can you explain what the source of the data that you are adding is please?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 50792805 by rati gogebashvili | 1 | 2017-08-03 11:50:27 UTC | Chetan_Gowda | Hi rati gogebashvilli, can I know the reason for mass deletion of residential roads in this area? all the roads you have deleted had names and more other details. I'm going to revert them soon. For any query, Please reply here. Thanks |
| 2 | 2017-08-13 17:33:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info - mentioned on help site: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/58290/vandalism-in-kutaisi-much-geometry-deleted | |
| 3 | 2017-08-13 17:38:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Chetan_Gowda Actually, there are quite a lot of other deletion changesets too. Presumably you are also going to revert those too?Best Regards, Andy | |
| 4 | 2017-08-15 16:00:22 UTC | Chetan_Gowda | Hi Andy, I will pass this revert process to you. Please take action on these deletions. Thank you!Chetan | |
| 5 | 2017-08-20 11:12:18 UTC | Alecs01 | This one was forgotten apparentely; reverted. | |
| 51064773 by rene78 | 1 | 2017-08-13 17:04:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info I've asked on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51052679 what these empty attractions were supposed to be.Best Regards,Andy |
| 51052679 by Les Pétards | 1 | 2017-08-13 17:03:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Les Pétards,Can you explain what these unnamed "tourist attractions" across the world actually were?Best Regards,Andy |
| 51069071 by VlIvYur | 1 | 2017-08-13 15:20:15 UTC | SK53 | I realise this changeset was mainly fixing minor errors, but it's rather difficult to review the changes when the area covered is so large.Changes like converting existing areas to multipolygons can be quite confusing, because one sees tags deleted from ways.Lastly I note one or two over cor... |
| 2 | 2017-08-13 16:59:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'd agree with SK53 about relation usage here - certainly mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7467686 as a relation is overcomplicated and misuses a fence as part of it. If there's a fence, map that; if there's a leisure area map that too (using the same nodes if appropriate). To map so... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-13 23:38:26 UTC | VlIvYur | Returned note for archive.Relations: that was I said SomeoneElse before: it's hard to find right way if there are many ways over the same points. If you want write-once without multipolygons try to edit around Nottigham railway station.Breakage was before me: someone made mini golf unclosed wi... | |
| 50980327 by Citymaps | 1 | 2017-08-13 13:55:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what " so it appears in the same priority as Wales" means? Appears where?Best Regards,Andy |
| 50698478 by ArjanO | 1 | 2017-07-31 21:50:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello ArjanO,The data that you've imported here clearly contained some problems (data at latitude 0, longitude 0). Was it discussed anywhere? See the links from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import which describe the steps that should happen before an import takes place.Best Regards,An... |
| 2 | 2017-08-08 14:19:02 UTC | ArjanO | Hi Andy,I guess something went wrong with an import.Point taken.best regards,Arjano | |
| 3 | 2017-08-10 09:06:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Arjano,Was the import discussed anywhere?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 50955587 by VlIvYur | 1 | 2017-08-09 14:03:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Presumably https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3835590182/history is no longer a carpet shop?Best Regards,Andy |
| 50971446 by Jonas official | 1 | 2017-08-09 13:25:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.Have you any idea how incorrect latitude and lo... |
| 2 | 2017-08-09 14:42:35 UTC | Jonas official | I dont know exact answer, but what i can say probably might be due to differences in projection coordinate system UTM that was set during the GPS track photogeometry | |
| 23202401 by volatile_ant | 1 | 2017-08-08 12:50:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added "designation=shed" to e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158177904 here. I think you might have meant "description"? "designation" is used to indicate the legal classification of something - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Adesign... |
| 50789876 by ethylisocyanat | 1 | 2017-08-03 10:19:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,It looks like some of the changes that you made here aren't actually valid. For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288217838 is extremely unlikely to be part of a cane processing plant. I've been to the Netherlands many times, and rolling fields of sugarcane were notable by their a... |
| 2 | 2017-08-08 09:41:02 UTC | ethylisocyanat | Hi Andy,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391400377 was demolished,but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392350505 is clearly still active.It is not producing any raw sugar, but specialties:De fabriek in Puttershoek produceert de droge specialiteiten basterdsuiker en poedersuiker in zo... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-08 09:53:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Thanks for that.Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2017-08-09 12:31:27 UTC | ethylisocyanat | Hi Andy,thanks for being tough on all suspicious changesets! | |
| 50641124 by Robert Higgins | 1 | 2017-08-07 20:49:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Is this perhaps a pub? If so, "amenity=pub" would be the appropriate tagging for it.Also is the operator perhaps "JD Wetherspoon"?Best Regards,Andy |
| 50888347 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-08-07 13:06:58 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi, is way 342863745 really named Bus Link? If this is not a proper name, please remove it. If it is, I suggest adding a note to say it really is the name.Cheers,Mike |
| 2 | 2017-08-07 13:28:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes, it really is called that. | |
| 49214137 by Supaplex | 1 | 2017-06-05 11:54:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,You've made a tag change to these items, but are you and the rest of the TW community happy that the location of new items in TW is correct? The changeset that added them https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49196299 added many other objects in the middle of the sea - have you checked the l... |
| 2 | 2017-06-05 11:55:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | （自動翻譯）嗨，您已經對這些項目進行了標籤更改，但是您和TW社區的其他成員對TW中新項目的位置是否正確？ 添加他們的變更集https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49196299在海中添加了許多其他對象 - 您是否檢查了您在此處修... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-04 21:01:12 UTC | jidanni | 您東西丟於http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/24.00000/121.00000 不好。 | |
| 4 | 2017-08-07 10:32:20 UTC | Supaplex | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4891499275新北市安坑的點位跑到台中 | |
| 5 | 2017-08-07 10:39:54 UTC | Supaplex | 然後，不是我丟的，是Geothings丟上去的http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49185168 | |
| 6 | 2017-08-07 10:48:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Supaplex Geothings data imports (here and elsewhere) have caused lots of problems. I commented on this changeset to tell you that the data that you were modifying is probably misplaced. | |
| 7 | 2017-08-07 12:19:21 UTC | Supaplex | I had already modified the nodes outside of Taiwan terterity. The one node jidanni says the location is wrong, is misplace to another county. | |
| 15674998 by markbegbie | 1 | 2017-08-07 10:41:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi just spotted something a bit odd with the Loch Katrine Aqueduct. If you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216514037#map=18/56.16172/-4.47594&layers=H it seems to go east of the Duchray Bridge across Duchray Water whereas there is an aqueduct https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21651405... |
| 50856876 by rowers2 | 1 | 2017-08-07 01:18:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - you've added a node in the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset! |
| 39084380 by tms13 | 1 | 2017-08-06 20:50:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi - just wondered about the layer tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164651832 . It's set to layer=1, but the bit to the north is layer=-1. Both sections are location=underground.Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-08-08 16:55:47 UTC | tms13 | Thanks. I've fixed this, and in progress of more accurately tracing both aqueducts using OS 6"/mile mapping from early 1900s. | |
| 50842548 by mueschel | 1 | 2017-08-04 16:50:24 UTC | GinaroZ | I think mot is correct, as it offers an MOT service? |
| 2 | 2017-08-04 17:40:28 UTC | mueschel | Shouldn't it be amenity=vehicle_inspection or service:vehicle:inspection=yes then? The first is documented and used 800 times, the latter is used 30 times. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-05 13:14:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Something involving MOT would make perfect sense to me - see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=mot#keys and http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=mot#values for where it's been used before. "inspection" is hardly used for MOTs; see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/sea... | |
| 4 | 2017-08-05 13:49:16 UTC | mueschel | I'm not from the UK, so I didn't hear the term MOT before.But as far as I see, these tags involving the term MOT are used maybe 50 times in the UK, while all the rest of Europe has the tag amenity=vehicle_inspection used 1300 times. This tag is supported in JOSM and shown e.g. in Osmand as well.... | |
| 44265342 by Nemigo | 1 | 2017-08-05 10:00:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Nemigo,In OSM we map the world as it exists, not as we'd like it to be. Changing a McDonald's to a McMerda is not OK - don't do it again.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2017-08-05 10:01:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | (Traducción automática al es)Hola Nemigo,En OSM trazamos el mundo como existe, no como nos gustaría que fuera. Cambiar un McDonald's a un McMerda no está bien - no lo hagas de nuevo.Atentamente,Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM. | |
| 50759912 by drsgis | 1 | 2017-08-01 20:23:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what data was "corrected" here? This changeset has a very large area, and it's not clear what "Corrected data" means.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-08-01 20:29:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Something definately went wrong with http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512114867/history (which you've snce fixed - thanks) - any idea how that happened? | |
| 3 | 2017-08-02 02:27:32 UTC | drsgis | I don't know what went wrong. I'm using the arcmap extension, which was being a bit buggy today, and when I synced the edited data for some reason a couple of vertices on one road segment were shot clear across the world. So the changeset area is not nearly that big. I fixed misaligned roads, fixed... | |
| 4 | 2017-08-04 14:03:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Whatever it was, thanks for fixing the data :) | |
| 50535766 by ArjanO | 1 | 2017-08-04 08:45:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset added a large number of streetlights in the middle of a field in France. How did that happen?See http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4990806032/history#map=18/47.97477/3.31544 for example. |
| 50762532 by Rudipeters | 1 | 2017-08-03 10:09:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5007981725 seems to be a duplicate of the pub on the corner. Probably worth merging them.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-08-03 10:20:13 UTC | Rudipeters | Hi Andy,Your comment can be right, I didn't check the neighourhood for other places. The only that I know is that this restaurant exists. Maybe it's the new name of a former place. If you happen to be there please feel free to check the situation on site and merge the two places. Or let me k... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-03 10:31:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | It looks like the same place to me - I'd just merge the two values onto one node and leave it as a restaurant. | |
| 4 | 2017-08-03 12:05:28 UTC | Rudipeters | If I only knew how to...Can you do it (please)?Just to make clear we didn't misunderstand each other: the "Duchess of Argyll" is there (I had some Mexican food there last Monday), the "Gazelle" I didn't see, hence my idea that "Duchess..." is just the new name o... | |
| 5 | 2017-08-03 12:24:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | No problem - all done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50807427 . | |
| 6 | 2017-08-08 06:26:23 UTC | Rudipeters | Thank you! (and sorry for not answering immediately...) | |
| 33762511 by will_p | 1 | 2017-08-01 18:18:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi will,Quick question - does the edit to the location of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3726792237/history after your change look OK to you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-08-02 11:21:02 UTC | will_p | It appears that the whole roundabout was moved rather than just the traffic signals. Everything was shifted roughly 2 metres to the west. Looking at GPS traces I think the original position was slightly more accurate, but it's probably too minor to worry about. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-02 12:57:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | OK, Thanks. | |
| 50754014 by luciecohen | 1 | 2017-08-01 18:14:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I don't suppose you are aware that OSM is a live worldwide database that is able to instantaneously change the characteristics of hundreds of folks maps. I hope you can realise that the live database is not the place to conduct tests. (Tests can be done off line ... |
| 2 | 2017-08-01 22:01:11 UTC | luciecohen | Hi Bernard,My apologies - I didn't appreciate the nature of the programme. Thank god I didn't do more damage! Thanks for being so polite in your response - I'll leave the site alone in future. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-02 11:12:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you want to add test data you can try https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ - it's just like the "live" site but with just test data in it. | |
| 4 | 2017-08-02 20:59:00 UTC | freebeer | Hallo Lucie,May I repeat the welcome Bernard gave...You wrote:"I'll leave the site alone in future."Please don't... Constructive contributions are always welcome, and there is a lot to be done, perhaps less in London relative to elsewhere -- but I see dozens of unresolved notes ne... | |
| 50166271 by Hieu Van | 1 | 2017-07-31 22:59:09 UTC | ethylisocyanat | Hi Hieu Van,was it your intention to delete the relation of the Asian Highway 1: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3839665? |
| 2 | 2017-08-02 08:04:29 UTC | Hieu Van | Yes, it was a duplication fix | |
| 3 | 2017-08-02 08:54:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3839665/history was a super-relation (as you can see from the previous members of it). Looking at one of those, http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/152361 does not appear to be a member of any super-relation. What was http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/38... | |
| 49828937 by Hobgoblin | 1 | 2017-08-01 19:52:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just for info - I deleted a duplicate "Birth of Sky" artwork http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4936507323/history creatd in here. The other one that you added had more info on it so I left that.http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4846191746Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-08-01 20:17:10 UTC | Hobgoblin | Hi Andy,Thanks. Not sure how I managed that when was adding a couple of POIs in China. I seem to have created a huge area changeset too. Never mind - all sorted now.Neil | |
| 50741664 by xingdavis | 1 | 2017-08-01 09:17:10 UTC | wambacher | hi,please stop those changes. This area is CONTROLLED by India and CLAIMED by China.It is not ok to change that area.This political motivated edit will be reverted asap. The Data Working Group (DWG) is watching your activities and you will be blocked if you keep on doing that stuff. |
| 2 | 2017-08-01 09:46:27 UTC | xingdavis | How to prove that It is CONTROLLED by India. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-01 10:17:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | The Chinese media think it is controlled by India: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-39638543 :"a region that is part of China's territory but in which some areas are currently controlled by India," a Chinese state media report said. | |
| 4 | 2017-08-01 10:23:23 UTC | xingdavis | Can that represent the state? | |
| 5 | 2017-08-01 10:26:35 UTC | xingdavis | It is just a traitor lackeys.Don't let me see him, he'll regret it. | |
| 50728935 by HelioFelix | 1 | 2017-08-01 07:18:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello HelioFelix,Any imports into OSM must follow the procedure described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines . It's important to discuss imports with other mappers so that they can confirm that the data is licence-compatible and make sure that is is sensible in other ways.... |
| 2 | 2017-08-01 07:37:19 UTC | HelioFelix | I am not going to resolve the license issue. It is not sure the name, height, coordinates of survey points should go into the map. The best thing to do is to remove all of them. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-01 07:50:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | OK, thanks. | |
| 50733060 by TR42 | 1 | 2017-08-01 05:22:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just wondered what the source of the "lit" change to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150995433 was?Best Regards,Andy |
| 50635182 by Seznam2 | 1 | 2017-07-31 16:03:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,All your changesets are just titled "create changeset". Can you please explain what you are doing?Best Regards,Andy |
| 50695157 by Oppestands1947 | 1 | 2017-07-31 15:34:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain the changes you've made here? "fixing relations" doesn't really explain anything.As you may be aware, the boundaries here have been subject to politically-motivated edits in the past. It'd be helpful to all other mappers if you could explain the changes.Best R... |
| 50530165 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-24 14:23:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,It looks like there's a "partial non-reuse of nodes" issue here.I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509890783 is supposed to abut the landuse that surrounds it - it reuses nodes at the eastern side (which I'd expect) but not at the western, so there's an overlap. I g... |
| 2 | 2017-07-24 16:21:34 UTC | Rowland | Nodes are snapped to existing points, the residential area looks like that has spilt beyond its extent on the ground, have now snapped to share boundary | |
| 3 | 2017-07-27 07:54:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. | |
| 50562469 by SafwatHalaby_repair | 1 | 2017-07-25 18:48:42 UTC | rene78 | I guess this revert went partly wrong. For example node 1224150978 seems to be a valid village. |
| 2 | 2017-07-25 19:00:17 UTC | SafwatHalaby | Are you sure 1224150978 is a valid village? I saw tens of villages all named "الدار", meaning "home". I assumed they weren't real. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-25 19:05:19 UTC | SafwatHalaby | For instance, see these:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1222021281/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1217865870/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1219409595/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1224322328/history | |
| 4 | 2017-07-25 19:05:43 UTC | rene78 | If you go to this url - http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1224150978/history - Click on the coordinates of the last changeset, then edit, then zoom in as much as possible. You will see that there is a village. Maybe "الدار" is a common name in arabic? | |
| 5 | 2017-07-25 19:07:08 UTC | SafwatHalaby | Unlikely. "الدار" means "the home". It's even less likely to have many villages bearing the same name right next to each other. (See my links, and those aren't all). | |
| 6 | 2017-07-25 19:09:18 UTC | SafwatHalaby | Indeed there's a village. I think it'd be best to rescan all removed villages and re-add them without the name at all, just place=village. | |
| 7 | 2017-07-25 19:09:29 UTC | SafwatHalaby | Thanks for pointing this out! | |
| 8 | 2017-07-25 19:12:54 UTC | SafwatHalaby | In your particular example, if you zoom out a little, you'll notice there are 2 villages with seemingly valid names. Perhaps they also cover that area and it's all good after removing "الدار". | |
| 9 | 2017-07-25 19:32:45 UTC | rene78 | Not sure. But nonetheless it is a good idea to do some housekeeping once in a while. Especially quite a few of those maps.me edits are of low quality. Thanks. | |
| 10 | 2017-07-26 09:07:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any idea what the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256498994/history was here? It seems odd that it has got caught up in a "my house" tidy-up. | |
| 11 | 2017-07-26 20:42:38 UTC | SafwatHalaby | This node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2621574419 is part of the way, and it had its name tag removed. | |
| 12 | 2017-07-26 20:58:08 UTC | SafwatHalaby | Method used for anyone curious: Downloaded nodes bearing "hot words" via JOSM+overpass, and manually inspected them.the queries are often of the style node["name"~"hotWord"] or node["name:ar"~"hotWord"]. | |
| 13 | 2017-07-26 20:59:21 UTC | SafwatHalaby | A time-consuming followup would be manually inspecting the edit history of each person who added a node that was deleted in this changeset. Looking for easy ways to script this. | |
| 50464904 by kevjs1982 | 1 | 2017-07-24 15:54:07 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi, I see you have added access=no to ways 16533193 and 16533219. These are footways and have foot=permissive on them, so access=no has no effect other than to cause confusion as to what was intended. If you intended there to be no pedestrian access, please remove foot=permissive, otherwise, please ... |
| 2 | 2017-07-24 16:13:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Mike For info see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50175156 and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nottingham/Broadmarsh_Re-development - it's very much a work in progress at the moment. | |
| 50528529 by rocari | 1 | 2017-07-24 14:33:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 50482193 by JamesKingdom | 1 | 2017-07-24 10:06:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi James,This looks very much like a mechanical edit - was it discussed anywhere?Not that I expect that anyone would necessarily have complained, but a "heads up" to anyone who's consuming the data would have been nice.Also, I presume that you did actually check all 135 nodes to see ... |
| 2 | 2017-07-24 10:49:17 UTC | JamesKingdom | Hi Andy,Sorry for not notifying, I was just going on the basis that the amount being modified was quite low.I checked most locations, but I will double check them all later today, or I can revert them if you like.Sorry for the inconvenience James | |
| 3 | 2017-07-24 14:58:11 UTC | JamesKingdom | Hi Andy,I have checked on the map and imagery, and all 135 look to be in plausible locations.Sorry again for the fuss,James | |
| 38247099 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2016-06-14 16:00:53 UTC | RicoZ | The reverted changeset clearly had some errors but I think many of the objects are in fact cave_entrances. |
| 2 | 2016-06-14 16:16:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | @RicoZ Indeed, and local mappers will I'm sure pick those up over time.The solution to "some cave entrances are incorrectly mapped as caves" is not to change ALL caves to cave entrances - that's just differently wrong.By their very nature (being underground and not visible on aeria... | |
| 3 | 2016-06-17 15:20:23 UTC | RicoZ | Thanks, I have started http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Dcave and am looking at those places now | |
| 4 | 2017-04-02 08:16:25 UTC | zstadler | Currently, there is "cave" is not an approved tag. .I find is strange that the most appropriate approved tag "natural=cave_entrance" was replaced by an tag that was proposed at the time of the change..As a result of this change, applicable caves have disappeared from maps... | |
| 5 | 2017-07-23 07:38:51 UTC | zstadler | The proposed "natural=cave" proposal applies to ways and areas..I therefore changed/reverted all "natural=cave" nodes in Israel and Palestine to "natural=cave_entrance". | |
| 6 | 2017-07-23 09:23:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | @zstadler OSM does not have "approved" tags, If someone has mapped something beyond a "cave entrance" as a "natural=cave" then that's perfectly OK. As noted above, as with any "odd tagging" I'd expect local mappers to check examples near them, as I presume y... | |
| 7 | 2017-07-23 10:04:46 UTC | RicoZ | @zstadler: most of the nodes natural=cave should be natural=cave_entrance but not all. It may be that in Israel the data is sufficiently homogenous that you can simply replace it but in other countries I found mappers tagged wine cellars, restaurants and many other objects with nodes of type natura... | |
| 8 | 2017-07-23 15:09:30 UTC | zstadler | Yes, I'm the original mapper of all recently corrected entries, and they should have been "natural=cave_entrance" in the first place. @SomeoneElse: The https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process says a proposal can be approved by voting. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pr... | |
| 37989334 by Warofdreams | 1 | 2017-07-21 12:20:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,You've got Europa Link with a "ref" of C760. Is that actually signed? It didn't used to be (a couple of years ago). If not, official_ref would be the preferred way of tagging it - see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/official_ref#values .Best Regards,Andy |
| 50432357 by rodolfovar | 1 | 2017-07-21 07:52:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.Best Regards,Andy |
| 50389565 by Steve and | 1 | 2017-07-19 19:13:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4978125922 really a tourist information place or is it a taxi office? |
| 50390516 by VlIvYur | 1 | 2017-07-19 19:12:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Welcome to Nottingham! If you're around on Tuesday, you might like to know that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nottingham/Pub_Meetup is happening at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116810775 . |
| 49971632 by wegspotter | 1 | 2017-07-19 16:42:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Any idea how a node near the south pole http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4946117229 got added here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 49974079 by WFriberg | 1 | 2017-07-19 16:39:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I've changed this back because some of the changes appeared to have been made by mistake, including renaming a shopping centre to Vodafone.Best Regards,Andy |
| 50221930 by Anna Tralala | 1 | 2017-07-19 15:31:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4965493629 really a viewpoint in the middle of the street? It seems an odd location.Best Regards,Andy |
| 50405238 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-19 13:33:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Rowland,You're still creating changesets without comments. Please stop doing this immediately. If you do you'll get blocked again. See link to previous discussion at http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1415 .Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 48530397 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-05-10 13:19:58 UTC | chillly | HI,Tidy after an import? Where was this import discussed? Are you aware of the guidelines? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 2 | 2017-05-10 16:28:04 UTC | GinaroZ | Looks like the school grounds are from OS OpenMap Local according to the source https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492338815 | |
| 3 | 2017-07-19 13:31:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | My personal experience of the various bits of OS OpenData (trees, water, buildings) is that "trees" were basically rubbish (there are probably some trees in the area, but you can get a much better idea of exactly where from Bing+survey), "water" was pretty good, if a few years ou... | |
| 50389080 by carlo fornaciari | 1 | 2017-07-19 10:37:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello carlo fornaciari,OSM is a collaborative project - we have to work together to create the best map. Part of this means that sending abuse to other users, either privately or in changeset comments such as this one, will not be tolerated.Please treat other community members with respect. If... |
| 2 | 2017-07-19 10:38:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | (Traduzione automatica)Ciao carlo fornaciari,OSM è un progetto collaborativo - dobbiamo lavorare insieme per creare la migliore mappa. Una parte di ciò significa che l'invio di abusi ad altri utenti, sia in privato che in commenti di changeet come questo, non sarà tollerato.... | |
| 50257850 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-13 20:48:06 UTC | DaveF | Hi againThe two landuse=industrial areas you've added appear to overlap existing areas & stretch into land own by other companies or is public land. If you have additional data could you add it to existing objects. |
| 2 | 2017-07-13 23:16:57 UTC | ndm | School would ideally use multipolygon.Nursing Home might not be a good match for a hospital -- there's a couple of different options documented in the wiki. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-15 13:20:05 UTC | Rowland | Per the source, the pound for the port after per there OS openmap local data. Will take a look at the multi polygons. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-15 21:31:47 UTC | DaveF | I'm unclear what you mean. I've looked at the OS Open Map - Local data for the area & see no boundary. Is there an on-line version of what you're using as data?Could you explain what 'Tayberry' is? Is it an editor or an importer? | |
| 5 | 2017-07-19 09:34:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | I suspect that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507316742 is mistagged. It's tagged as a hospital, but the name suggests it's a nursing home. Have a look in https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ for things like "nursing home" "care home" and "healthcare" and "social... | |
| 6 | 2017-07-19 13:03:27 UTC | DaveF | Social facility is probably what's required: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility | |
| 7 | 2017-07-19 20:51:16 UTC | ndm | I've redrawn from Bing and tagged as amenity=nursing_home as per JOSM defaults for "Nursing Home". | |
| 8 | 2017-07-19 20:55:11 UTC | ndm | I redrew Penny Brohn as well -- not sure about Bristol Port -- should at least be a relation? Probably needs extensive redrawing/reverting? | |
| 9 | 2017-07-20 09:39:38 UTC | DaveF | In JOSM There's also the newer amenity=social_facility as an umbrella value for all variants as list in the link I provided above, which seems sensible development to meThe two main problems I have with the port is 1) it's tagged as industrial which duplicates existing area2) it does tie in ... | |
| 10 | 2017-07-20 12:11:27 UTC | DaveF | Correction: "it *doesn't* tie in " | |
| 11 | 2017-07-20 19:20:36 UTC | ndm | I walked the bridleway ~2 months ago -- it's outside of the fenced industrial area. I note the original industrial area is still "underneath" the larger -- as is the foreshore, part of the coastline/inlets and a wildlife corridor I added a while ago. | |
| 50287689 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-15 23:19:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Rowland,Something seems to have gone wrong here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507606545 seems to be an almost exact duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507606545 (added about 6 years ago). This is not the first time that this has happened (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/c... |
| 2 | 2017-07-18 20:37:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for removing one of the duplicates http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66437278 , but would it be possible to answer the other questions too?Also - you're still not using changeset comments, and other mappers (unprompted by me) are complaining: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/50232241 .O... | |
| 50319628 by jan_olieslagers | 1 | 2017-07-16 09:46:40 UTC | DaveF | HiDo you have any details for this airstrip. I can find no info. |
| 2 | 2017-07-16 10:03:21 UTC | jan_olieslagers | I found it in a list , published as a pdf, called "Britisch Isles Airfield Guide". It dates from 2013 though, so I cannot vouch there still is an active aerdrome today. Do feel free to add "note" or "fixme" or "closed=yes" as you see fit. Regards, | |
| 3 | 2017-07-17 14:49:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | @jan_olieslagers what's the licence associated with the PDF and where did the information in it come from? | |
| 4 | 2017-07-17 15:54:10 UTC | jan_olieslagers | I've no idea. There is no mention of copyright or licence in the pdf that I could find. Let me have an address and I'll be glad to mail it to you. Regards, | |
| 5 | 2017-07-18 20:04:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | A quick web search of "Britisch Isles Airfield Guide" "pdf" "2013" finds a few candidates, such as http://www.laasdata.com/uploads/The-LAAS-British-Isles-Airfield-Guide.pdf . Is it perhaps one of those? In the absense of any other information we probably can't assum... | |
| 6 | 2017-07-19 10:23:52 UTC | Cebderby | Visually, the line of T hangars at the west shows it was an aviation site (at the time of the images). Looks like it is a private site known variously as (Wickwar/Yate) Chase Farm (Airstrip), certainly in use 2009-2016 (see https://svmc.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/August-2016.pdf). The E-W run... | |
| 49995328 by VlIvYur | 1 | 2017-07-18 16:39:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | For an example of what I'm talking about, see the fix-up in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50384009 . |
| 50384009 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-07-18 16:38:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | The changes here were to:o Remove fences that had been added purely by guesswork.o Joining component ways of the car park into one amenity=parking way and remove unnecessary multipolygon relation.o Redraw the residential landuse so that it uses the nodes of adjacent features that form the land... |
| 50337421 by VlIvYur | 1 | 2017-07-18 16:23:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508037415 is actually a driveway? It doesn't look like one from the imagery. |
| 2 | 2017-08-06 14:33:32 UTC | VlIvYur | Looks like. May be shop or garages there. There is no transit traffic, so why not driveway?People tags as driveways really strange things like http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103353135http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103353137http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103353142That I'll tag only with... | |
| 50187902 by VlIvYur | 1 | 2017-07-18 16:16:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any reason that you've created https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7387261 as a multipolygon, when it's just a simple car park area? Please don't make the data in OSM more complicated than it needs to be (in particular, don't make it more complicated than it actually is on the ground). Creating ... |
| 2 | 2017-08-06 15:59:46 UTC | VlIvYur | It is not 'just a simple car park' - almost all of the borders where drawn (two walls of buildings and a fence), so I've added a line on the S and made multi.Maybe in this case it was more simple to click all points around and draw new closed polyline. But you have to be more careful with points (... | |
| 50237302 by Carson_gor | 1 | 2017-07-13 11:13:49 UTC | wambacher | Hi, i'm not shure if your changes of name:zh are ok, BUT NEVER EVER remove boundary=administrative from any admin boundary! You did this for Belarus and Falkland Islands in this changeset.Please work more carefull.Regardswalter Fixes:http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/5025495... |
| 2 | 2017-07-13 12:11:15 UTC | wambacher | Just checked the list:https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/958-countries-compare-2017-07-13All missing boundaries with admin level are "result" of your work. You even changed Ukraine to type=site, which is vandalism.I'll contact Data Working Group and we will... | |
| 3 | 2017-07-13 13:45:00 UTC | Carson_gor | sorry for those error.i haven't charge those options.and i think this is about the slow of the web site and i type so fast.i'm so sorry for this | |
| 4 | 2017-07-13 13:45:52 UTC | Carson_gor | i just change the Chinese name of those. | |
| 5 | 2017-07-13 16:11:54 UTC | wambacher | Sorry, can't beleave you :(there are no know problems with poor internet connections. And never ever does a bad line change tags (e.g type=boundary to type=site for ukraine)Andy from DWG told me, that he contacted you too because of other strange edits :(please try to do a good job.\... | |
| 6 | 2017-07-14 03:00:24 UTC | Carson_gor | ok , i know about the problem.it is find, i will improve myself on this. | |
| 7 | 2017-07-14 10:15:31 UTC | wambacher | hi,your last ~10 changesets were OK :)If you think, that is a technical problem, you should change the editor. iD is "for beginners only". complex edits like changing relations should be done by JOSM, which is much more stable and desingned for "professional use". In a lo... | |
| 8 | 2017-07-14 13:15:01 UTC | Carson_gor | i think the problem is not about i'm a beginners,it is because at the editor mode my browser on openstreetmap is very slow but other tab is find. so i think that the osm have to improve the editor mode more smoothly. | |
| 9 | 2017-07-14 13:32:39 UTC | wambacher | not right: iD uses browser but JOSM does not. JOSM does: download data to local system/edit local/upload changes only to osmthat is much less traffic than iD. btw: iD is making many problems on complex relations (e.g. boundaries). ok, just changing tags it's doing well - i hope. But ... | |
| 10 | 2017-07-16 12:35:38 UTC | angys | please revert the name:zh to original one .Traditional chinese script should use name:zh-hant not use the brackets.This already violate and can be mark as vandalism. | |
| 11 | 2017-07-17 11:18:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Carson_gor Can you explain the source of your changes and who you discussed them with? Country names affect everyone - it's basic politeness to ensure that changes to them are discussed and that everyone is happy. | |
| 12 | 2017-07-17 11:48:41 UTC | Carson_gor | @SomeoneElse i know what you worry about and my source is base on the google map, but some have use the osm lab of zh-Hans , and i have discuss with @angys, thank you of his understanding. the zh tag will have Simplified Chinese and Traditional Chinese name together. | |
| 13 | 2017-07-17 12:12:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Actually, my concern wasn't that you were copying from Google (please confirm that you aren't), it was that you haven't discussed these changes with the wider OSM communities around the world. Can you please explain what discussion has taken place? | |
| 14 | 2017-07-18 14:14:58 UTC | Carson_gor | @SomeoneElse https://osmtw.hackpad.com/RFC-Multilingual-names-ngewyizFYzNi think this link have the decision, isn't it? | |
| 15 | 2017-07-18 14:57:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing, because the document doesn't say, but that looks like a hackpad used within the OSM TW community only. | |
| 50359954 by Oscailt | 1 | 2017-07-17 20:46:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - this seems to have added a node at latitude 0, longitude 0. |
| 50229999 by Gayle Abbott | 1 | 2017-07-12 17:19:43 UTC | chillly | This is not a university. please stop adding university to all the objects within the area of the university. This is incorrect tagging. Are you going to remove these? |
| 2 | 2017-07-17 15:00:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | The "water-based hockey pitch university" has been fixed, but there is still a "national throws centre university" at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58404006 . | |
| 50338467 by TwistaDee | 1 | 2017-07-17 14:42:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello TwistaDee,OpenStreetMap is designed to be a map of the world as it really exists. If you'd like to design an imaginary city, then please use http://opengeofiction.net/ for that (it's exactly the same as OSM, except that it's imaginary).Alternatively, if you'd like to stay here, why not ma... |
| 2 | 2017-07-18 20:14:16 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50388714 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy-mapped city in Greenland. | |
| 50311231 by TwistaDee | 1 | 2017-07-17 07:37:15 UTC | karitotp | Hi TwistaDee, you added motoway highway with numbers as name (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507828193/history#map=19/74.61223/-41.71661) also on this changeset there are many crossing between highways without a intersection. Could you please check again and fix them? thank you |
| 2 | 2017-07-17 14:36:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | @karitop - just so you're aware, you're commenting on "numbers as name" on a freeway entered by a user in the middle of _Greenland_ . Let's just say that the semantics of the tagging here is the least of our worries :) | |
| 3 | 2017-07-18 20:14:21 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50388714 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy-mapped city in Greenland. | |
| 50327786 by J N Squire | 1 | 2017-07-17 09:25:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello - something went a bit wrong here; you've added these in the middle of the Atlantic! |
| 50283538 by Ruedi Ernst | 1 | 2017-07-14 15:35:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and long... |
| 2 | 2017-07-17 06:15:43 UTC | Ruedi Ernst | Hello AndyI am still OSM beginner, I am aware of no mistake. Could be that I have made one.I thank you but for the correct.Thanks and regardsRuedi | |
| 50283787 by matthew maxwell | 1 | 2017-07-14 14:42:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetmap! What exactly is "Fornix locus"?In OSM, in order for anything, including map renderers, to do anything useful with the data it'll need something to go with the name to say what sort of name it is.Maybe something at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki... |
| 50274475 by Habub | 1 | 2017-07-14 09:56:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - something went a bit wrong here. This school got added in the middle of the Atlantic! |
| 50254871 by Athaul Rai | 1 | 2017-07-14 09:54:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 18277343 by robgeb | 1 | 2017-06-14 15:46:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42966910/history you've added a wikipedia link from a 707 parked at Hamburg to the wikipedia page for Boeing 707s in general. This doesn't make a lot of sense. If there's a wikipedia page for this specific example of a 707, then of course it would make sen... |
| 2 | 2017-07-13 11:20:09 UTC | robgeb | I agree.Best Regards, robgeb | |
| 3 | 2017-07-13 11:34:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | OK, are you going to revert this, or would you like me to? | |
| 50162714 by ninjamask | 1 | 2017-07-10 07:49:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi ninjamask,Throwing such a large area at JOSM validator does not achieve anything useful - in fact in some cases it actually makes things worse because it obscures the remaining problems caused by e.g. a bad import.For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506046148/history was deleted he... |
| 2 | 2017-07-12 22:35:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just for info, it took me 2-3 hours extra last night to to fix up the import in India because of the changes here. | |
| 50163638 by ninjamask | 1 | 2017-07-10 22:37:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,According to http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=50163638 5 relations had their tags changed by this changeset. Can you explain why those tag values were changed and that the tags mean?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-07-12 01:01:52 UTC | ninjamask | JOSM fixed multiple whitespaces. Dunno what the tag means | |
| 3 | 2017-07-12 21:47:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Please don't do this.If you don't understand what a tag means, you shouldn't change the value. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-12 22:58:53 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50242599 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some of a series of mechanical edits where it was clear (from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50163638 ) that the mapper didn't understand the tags being modified. See also comm... | |
| 50216733 by Enrique Moron | 1 | 2017-07-12 12:56:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As well as crossing the Atlantic, this changes adds lots of unconnected nodes such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4965049954 . Can you explain what they're for?Best Regards,Andy |
| 50216106 by Enrique Moron | 1 | 2017-07-12 12:54:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.Have you any idea how incorrect latitude and longitude values could have got... |
| 2 | 2017-07-12 18:00:59 UTC | Enrique Moron | Hi, I'm using a translator. It was an accidental mistake. Maybe it's due to the editor (josm), which raised a rectangle by mistake. However the marked area is very, very inferior. In conclusion I have no explanation that it could have happened. | |
| 50210604 by tambre | 1 | 2017-07-12 10:14:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Did you discuss the changes to these objects with the OSM communities concerned, and with the people who originally added them?I'd be interested to know how you verified these changes without any source.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-07-12 10:59:26 UTC | tambre | I did not verify nor discuss with the relevant OSM communities (no idea this was something one should do). As stated by the changeset comment, I simply re-tagged from deprecated to non-deprecated ones. Feel free to revert. | |
| 50209964 by tambre | 1 | 2017-07-11 21:05:56 UTC | DaveF | HiThis is an automated edit. Have you discussed this on any OSM forum? |
| 2 | 2017-07-12 05:37:28 UTC | tambre | This wasn't an automated edit. I went through everything manually. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-12 08:57:08 UTC | DaveF | Your changeset was open for just 6 seconds. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-12 09:29:00 UTC | tambre | After some Googling about how changesets works, it seems my editor (JOSM) simply uploads all changes at once by default. As for the 6 seconds, it seems roughly like the time it would take me to upload a changeset of this size. Should I in future figure out how to avoid uploading everything at once? ... | |
| 5 | 2017-07-12 10:08:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!There are a few reasons why automated edits such as this one need to be discussed.One is to give people who are using the "old" tagging chance to change to the "new" tagging. Without any kind of warning, features will disappear from downstr... | |
| 6 | 2017-07-12 10:11:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | For more info, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct . | |
| 50197967 by amisha2016 | 1 | 2017-07-11 10:33:29 UTC | amisha2016 | @SomeoneElseI have tried to upload clubs. It seems correct according to me. Please check if I have committed any mistake. |
| 2 | 2017-07-11 11:09:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | @amisha2016 As I said over on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 " before doing any sort of import you'll need to read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import , https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of... | |
| 50170769 by javaliuchao | 1 | 2017-07-11 08:55:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello - can you explain why you have deleted so many things in this and previous changesets? |
| 2 | 2017-07-11 08:55:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | 你好 - 你能解释为什么你在这个和以前的变更集中删除了这么多东西？ | |
| 3 | 2017-07-12 15:09:59 UTC | mavl | Hello. This changeset is reverted. | |
| 4 | 2017-08-03 13:19:55 UTC | hanchao | 请尊重其他人的工作成果 不用乱删数据 | |
| 50009835 by amisha2016 | 1 | 2017-07-10 23:23:42 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India. |
| 2 | 2017-07-11 08:11:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230598545/history overlaps with the building to the east - can you please check which is correct? | |
| 50130355 by amisha2016 | 1 | 2017-07-10 12:30:54 UTC | didier2020 | hi,in this changeset/area there is- duplicated way (géometry and tags)- duplicated nodes (géometry and tags)- Way node tagged like waylike this http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7381948i think it's an import and not source=knowledgeCan you fix all this issues ?... |
| 2 | 2017-07-10 12:31:54 UTC | didier2020 | major issues are on osmose :- http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=india_punjab&item=1230- http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?source=17424&item=4090&class=1 | |
| 3 | 2017-07-10 18:03:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | @didier2020 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1400 (which has now been read). | |
| 4 | 2017-07-10 18:37:31 UTC | amisha2016 | @SomeoneElse Shall I revert the changeset 50130355?Procedure following:-1. In JOSM, downloaded the plugin reverter2. Revert the changeset 50130553. UploadI have not uploaded yet. If you say I will upload it. | |
| 5 | 2017-07-10 19:35:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Since there are a few problems, and there are also "fixup" edits by other mappers since, it might be easier if I did it. I'll be in a position to do it in a couple of hours. | |
| 6 | 2017-07-10 23:23:36 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India. | |
| 7 | 2017-07-11 08:02:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | OK, all now finally complete. There were a significant number of problems here.Firstly, before doing any sort of import you'll need to read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import , https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_co... | |
| 50189131 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-07-11 07:20:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India. This changesets deletes objects that had been "tidied" by mapping-for-the-QA-tool and could not be deleted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50188052 . |
| 50130653 by amisha2016 | 1 | 2017-07-10 07:09:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what you've trying to do here? This looks like an import of data from an external source - what was that source ("source=knowledge" on the changeset gives us no clue).Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-07-10 23:23:39 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India. | |
| 50115490 by SK53 | 1 | 2017-07-09 17:34:42 UTC | dforsi | You may want to check the tag "barruer" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505899095 |
| 2 | 2017-07-09 18:30:43 UTC | SK53 | Will be checking it anyway as I need to look at photo to see what kind it is & whether there was a stile or gate. Dont know why this didnt autocomplete | |
| 3 | 2017-07-09 23:46:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | I think the bridge at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505901990 has got a bit carried away too :) | |
| 4 | 2017-07-10 07:27:21 UTC | dforsi | Sometimes we see strange things :)Also this tunnel with layer=1 should be -1 I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505901985 | |
| 48219710 by radek-drlicka | 1 | 2017-07-09 10:26:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just wondering the reasoning behind "castle_type=defensive" on Bolsover Castle? Whilst it's true that the original castle here was defensive, what's here now is essentially just a country house. As your source wikipedia says, "the castle was designed for elegant living rathe... |
| 50085824 by Ashfield | 1 | 2017-07-07 13:27:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for adding these. Just for info, the latest OS Locator data does include a couple of the new roads:http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?zoom=18&lat=53.11182&lon=-1.26038 |
| 50106405 by HughPH | 1 | 2017-07-07 13:22:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for filling in the details here! |
| 2 | 2017-07-07 22:31:42 UTC | HughPH | I live in the area, so it makes sense to use what I know! | |
| 50059106 by gifarisaesac | 1 | 2017-07-06 10:25:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea ho... |
| 2 | 2017-07-06 10:25:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Actually - looking at the data I can see what it is, it's the learnosm test data that got uploaded by mistake. | |
| 50051698 by Kaur Manpreet | 1 | 2017-07-06 10:22:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 50051696 by Mahesh Madhav | 1 | 2017-07-06 10:20:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 49970820 by Vugar Seidov | 1 | 2017-07-02 09:14:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Vugar Seidov, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!You've changed a number of names here, with a changeset comment of "The official name is Lachin".In this changeset you have changed a number of language-specific names for places to the same value. Language-specific names are there to a... |
| 2 | 2017-07-02 13:35:25 UTC | Vugar Seidov | Dear Andy, The name of the town is Lachin, not Berdzor. All the legal residents have been expelled due to the war, but they are considered IDPs with the right to return home. They are the only legal residents, and they call the town Lachin. Period!Those very few who currently and de-facto live... | |
| 3 | 2017-07-02 13:42:37 UTC | Vugar Seidov | Just another example to help you understand the situation. You know about the Turkish invasion of Cyprus. There was a town (and still is) called Famagusta. Before the invasion, it is entirely Greek-Cypriot. No Turk-Cypriots lived there. During the invasion, Turkish army entered the town and ordered ... | |
| 4 | 2017-07-02 14:08:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | I refer you again to http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf - speficially "The existence of a name, boundary location or description in the OpenStreetMapdatabase does NOT imply t... | |
| 5 | 2017-07-02 14:13:14 UTC | Vugar Seidov | Dear Andy, I got your point. Then would you mind to remove the name Artsvashen and change it to Bashkend, as NO ONE living on the ground in that village uses the former name?I hope, this will meet your requirements.Regards, Vugar | |
| 6 | 2017-07-02 14:40:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm no expert on the situation here, but assuming you're talking about the area around https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2597146 then on my reading of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artsvashen that would make some sort of sense. The relation has 4 names in the "name" field, the node h... | |
| 49923927 by b4inie | 1 | 2017-07-02 10:06:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 49724373 by RossH1 | 1 | 2017-06-21 16:03:57 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMHas someone really converted a house to a restaurant and called it Test?I think this needs to be removed as a restaurant. |
| 2 | 2017-06-28 12:33:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | @chillly Maybe they're waiting for someone to remove their test data before writing up their dissertation on "how robust OSM is to vandalism"! | |
| 3 | 2017-06-28 12:41:32 UTC | chillly | @SomeoneElse you're right, time to remove the junk | |
| 48576507 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-06-26 20:06:32 UTC | VlIvYur | Why did you dropp all of footway=crossing? |
| 2 | 2017-06-27 00:48:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you give any examples? I've left e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488741633 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488741636 . Strictly speaking those are traffic calming cushions though not crossings as such. You _can_ cross the road there, but can just as well cross anywhere else as well.... | |
| 49549101 by bdiscoe | 1 | 2017-06-18 18:04:15 UTC | marek kleciak | Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act. |
| 2 | 2017-06-18 18:34:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Marek,Can you please explain what were the actual problems caused by this changeset and the others on which you have similarly commented?Also, you may find that that using emotive language such as "stop destroying" is less effective at communicating what you want to get across than ... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-22 13:04:49 UTC | imagico | I would like to add that what bdiscoe did here was not in any way destroying a detailed map. He removed nodes which had a very little influence on the overall geometry because they were almost exactly in the middle between the next and the previous node. See http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?change... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-22 16:25:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info, see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1385 . | |
| 5 | 2017-06-23 05:46:26 UTC | bdiscoe | For what it's worth, I wrote OSM messages to marek kleciak explaining these edits, and even described the detailed steps he can do in JOSM to do the cleanup himself. | |
| 6 | 2017-06-23 07:16:50 UTC | marek kleciak | We are in touch with bdiscoe now. I wrote him about reasons for this mapping. We have opportunity to make an very exactly example for nepali authorities and show the results during SOTM Asia 2017. All old, too less forest areas should be removed/modified. I hope for help of you all: The goal would b... | |
| 7 | 2017-06-23 07:41:17 UTC | imagico | Who is 'we' here?Keep in mind that planning and organizing of mapping activities and development of mapping conventions should be public.Although there is not yet a formal policy on organized mapping activities it is good practice to document such activities and reference this in changeset c... | |
| 8 | 2017-06-23 07:50:00 UTC | marek kleciak | We, is Kathmandu Living Maps. As you probably know from german forum I do a lot for Nepal and try to inform communities in Germany and Poland about recent situation there.What you wrote about mapping activities is a part of old OSM communication problem, but you´re absolutely right, I should... | |
| 9 | 2017-06-26 05:49:54 UTC | marek kleciak | Hi everybody, KLL wil post information about this Project in the Wiki Project Nepal. Meanwhile I analyzed approach described by bdiscoe. Using generalization factor of 1.0 m we change the areas of smaller Farmlands in forests by up to 5%. I suggest the generalization factor of. 0.3m which make chan... | |
| 10 | 2017-06-26 15:32:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | @marek - having nodes closer together doesn't make for a map that matches reality better; it just makes it more difficult to edit. If you've got some specific examples perhaps write it up as a diary entry? | |
| 11 | 2017-06-26 16:14:53 UTC | marek kleciak | Absolutely. This matter needs an proposal and discusion of the community. | |
| 12 | 2017-06-28 03:50:12 UTC | bdiscoe | Marek the starting point of your analysis is incorrect. It assumes that the existing, hyper-noded wood areas are precisely correct with no uncertainty or error bars. Consider the factors involved - imprecise criteria, human variability, seasonality, poor resolution, loose rectification, etc. it is... | |
| 13 | 2017-06-28 04:39:19 UTC | marek kleciak | Ben wrote: imprecise criteria, human variability, seasonality, poor resolution, loose rectification.We have Premium Digital Globe images from last year for whole Nepal. Factors like human variability or seasonality are general for all OSM maps. Only activation of the community AND in this case l... | |
| 45811104 by sperlingskauz | 1 | 2017-06-19 13:57:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Has the flood barrier here been replaced by a dyke (in the Dutch, not the English sense)? The last time I was here there wasn't any sort of embankment here at all, just a flood barrier. |
| 2 | 2017-06-19 21:08:16 UTC | sperlingskauz | I made a cleanup because barrier=flood_barrier is a unusual tag. In most cases seamark:gate:category=flood_barrage is the right choise. But in this case it doesn't fit. In Bing it looks like a kind of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=dyke . Sorry, I was wrong. Is it a kind of wall ... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-26 15:24:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | This bit's just a wall, so barrier=flood_wall would work. | |
| 49744251 by anrew | 1 | 2017-06-25 13:30:11 UTC | SK53 | Hi, Just noticed your edits (nice adding the stuff up behind Woodhouse Park). You dont need to add foot=yes to a bridleway, particularly one with a designation tag: it's implicit in OSM that a highway=bridleway allows pedestrians, just as a highway=cycleway does in the UK (but not everywhere). Cycli... |
| 2 | 2017-06-26 15:15:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | FWIW, personally I'd always add foot=yes to "public bridleways" like this one so that someone (or more likely some router) unfamiliar with designation tags can figure out access rules.Cheers,Andy | |
| 49795247 by mapper999 | 1 | 2017-06-24 19:32:19 UTC | GinaroZ | Thanks for improving the tagging, just a shame the names aren't rendered on the standard layer :( |
| 2 | 2017-06-26 15:11:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Other maps will still show them - https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=15&lat=56.09576&lon=-3.30543 . | |
| 10918386 by SkegHammer | 1 | 2017-06-24 21:29:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What does "disused=no:isolated" on "Cromford Canal - Pinxton Arm (new line)" (now named as "Smotherfly Wide") mean here? I'm confused - as this stretch of waterway has had or is hoping to have at least 3 uses - a previously one as a diversion for the Erewash du... |
| 2 | 2017-06-25 09:00:31 UTC | SkegHammer | See: http://tinyurl.com/y6v8a5le Feel free to update tags if appropriate. Rgds //Mike | |
| 3 | 2017-06-25 09:25:37 UTC | SkegHammer | See also: http://tinyurl.com/yal3n4u4. A small scale map generated back in 2012 from the tags here: http://tinyurl.com/yar46lde | |
| 4 | 2017-06-25 14:57:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - so it's supposed to indicate bits that are disconnected, but are usable in some way as a canal?The bottom bit of Smotherfly isn't (I retagged that as drain because that's closer to what it is now). The top bit is probably wide enough, but there's no way to get a boat in and out.The C... | |
| 5 | 2017-06-25 18:53:32 UTC | SkegHammer | I think probably disused=yes if it's not open to the public. I can't remember what info I had that caused me to tag it as no:isolated. Rgds //Mike | |
| 6 | 2017-06-26 15:06:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I'll review the local ones to see if any others need changing. | |
| 49804213 by arm87 | 1 | 2017-06-25 01:47:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Can you explain a little bit what you mean by "Correcting international waters for Ceuta and Melilla"? As you're no doubt aware it's a sensitive issue, and all sides of the discussion will want to understand what's happened here, including changes to n... |
| 2 | 2017-06-25 08:14:10 UTC | arm87 | Hello Andy, thanks for the welcoming!I meant to say "territorial waters" (12nm). The lines for the maritime boundaries of Ceuta and Melilla were there already, but overwritten in a way that they seem internal Moroccan waters and mentioning a conflict that really doesn't exist. This is ... | |
| 49748659 by UPegasus | 1 | 2017-06-23 14:20:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and long... |
| 2 | 2017-06-23 16:10:10 UTC | UPegasus | Hello!I tried to make online edits, using Vespucci. It's unfamiliar to me and some data may be wrong.It's good that you quickly noticed inaccuracies and made the necessary changes. I'll try to be more careful.Thank You.Igor | |
| 3 | 2017-06-23 16:28:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | No problem (it's not your fault - likely your phone hadn't got a location yet).Best Regards,Andy | |
| 49769473 by Mrclean44 | 1 | 2017-06-23 14:28:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 49744503 by Joxit | 1 | 2017-06-22 13:30:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Unfortunately, and surprising as it meay seem, wikipedia isn't actually a valid source for OSM! |
| 2 | 2017-06-22 14:16:05 UTC | Joxit | Okay, is the world factbook good enough for OSM? | |
| 3 | 2017-06-22 14:27:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | No idea - what licence is it made available under? | |
| 4 | 2017-06-22 14:33:18 UTC | Joxit | It's in the public domain. Here is the statement : The Factbook is in the public domain. Accordingly, it may be copied freely without permission of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/docs/contributor_copyright.html | |
| 5 | 2017-06-22 15:32:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | That'd be OK licence-wise, sure. I'm not entirely convinced about the need for "square kilometer" values (since they're derivable from the boundaries) but, meh. | |
| 49285785 by joe egg | 1 | 2017-06-22 13:50:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Not sure how it happened, but Alsager managed to turn into a Domino's Pizza place here - see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-thenorth/2017-June/thread.html for more info. It's fixed now. |
| 2 | 2017-06-22 19:07:49 UTC | joe egg | Not sure what had happened. I have also just deleted an erratic point ( Dominic Pizza in middle of Civic Centre .I did some Alsager updates last week and deleted a number of Traffic lights at the end of cul de sacs in the Poppyfields and Hall Drive area. | |
| 49503519 by thekopian | 1 | 2017-06-21 20:39:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Unfortunately something went a bit wrong here - part of a kerb http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439072999 got dragged across town and joined to an underground river http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170048648 . I've moved it back, so no harm done.Best Regards,\... |
| 49703456 by ketkarah | 1 | 2017-06-21 08:42:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 49668409 by gonn | 1 | 2017-06-20 08:10:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - I think that POI+ on your phone doesn't have a location. You've added this cafe in the middle of the Atlantic! This happened the last time you used POI+, so I'd suggest that you don't use it again, at least until https://github.com/davidchiles/osm-poi-editor-iOS/issues/12 is fixed.Other o... |
| 44525055 by dudone | 1 | 2017-06-19 14:36:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | I suspect that the former railway at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32678501/history has grown an extra tree_row tag by mistake? |
| 2 | 2017-06-20 20:21:48 UTC | dudone | Thanks for spotting this. I've removed the tag.Dudley | |
| 49627026 by Tomas Straupis | 1 | 2017-06-18 17:54:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and long... |
| 2 | 2017-06-18 18:53:16 UTC | Tomas Straupis | After some time editing I made a mistake and instead of deleting object from relation, I deleted whole data layer, which ment all my edits. So I opened JOSM autosave file and used that for further edits. This could have caused the 0 lat/lon. Sorry for that. (now I'm thinking JOSM could have a rule i... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-18 19:13:59 UTC | Tomas Straupis | I've checked the saved .osm file and it does contain one node with negative id (new node) and lat/lon=0/0 and action 'modify'...This node was not included in any object in that .osm file.I have no idea how it ended up there. I was not using JOSM "add point at coordinates" functionality... | |
| 49615304 by gifarisaesac | 1 | 2017-06-18 17:46:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've just uploaded the learnosm test data to OSM again! As I said in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49566338 , please don't do that. |
| 49598796 by ccityplanner12 | 1 | 2017-06-16 21:33:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello ccityplanner12,The tagging on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/925374644 seems a bit odd - it seems to have a ref set to a Youtube video.Best Regards,Andy |
| 43944517 by Lightswitchr | 1 | 2017-06-16 21:19:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - something gone wrong with the merging that created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35542400/history . It now has "lcn_ref=1;2;2" and "lcn=proposed;yes;yes".Are you OK to split it again and reapply the old tags or would you like me to do it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 14643082 by michaelinredhill | 1 | 2017-06-16 21:03:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201042775/history is tagged as "historic=f". I guess that this is a typo for something?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-08-29 21:25:23 UTC | matt_twam_asi | Hi,Also, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41527779 has source:designarion. Is this also a typo? I changed a few ways with this tag to source:designation in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51557361 but will hold off doing anything further for the moment as there are a lot of ways with ... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-30 13:55:16 UTC | matt_twam_asi | Sorry, not to the west. I meant to the east. I knew I'd fall foul of Muphry's Law. | |
| 44516898 by JonS | 1 | 2017-06-16 21:02:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi JonS,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460552576/history is tagged as "historic=f" - is that a miskeying of the other key highway=footway?Best Regards,Andy |
| 49566338 by gifarisaesac | 1 | 2017-06-15 22:45:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because a copy of the learnosm test data was accidentally added there.Best Regards,Andy |
| 49526098 by Syvanne Aloni | 1 | 2017-06-14 12:50:43 UTC | DaveF | Please refrain from adding not existing features. As noted previously there's a likelihood they'll be removed, which would be a waste of your time. Note comment about historical data: http://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome.html |
| 2 | 2017-06-15 10:54:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | @SNLA this has been mentioned on the talk-gb list - https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-June/020317.html . If you want to engage with the GB OSM community, that's probably the best place to do it, and also one of the best places to ask for advice about whatever it is that you're ... | |
| 49515274 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-06-14 20:41:27 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | I think you might be confusing the old Travelling Man shop, at 54 Goodramgate, which is vacant with their new shop at 74 which is where they are now trading from (unless they have closed down in the past 3 days) |
| 2 | 2017-06-14 21:05:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Quite possibly - I didn't mark the position; was just surprised that it was shut. | |
| 49520039 by Gadacz | 1 | 2017-06-14 08:31:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I've removed the wikipedia tag you added here because the wikipedia page for an abstract concept ("null island") isn't relevant to a physical buoy floating in the ocean. Best Regards,Andy |
| 49515202 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-06-14 00:20:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | The sign on the side says just "Travelodge"; their website suggests an official name of "Travelodge York Central Layerthorpe". |
| 49401905 by Syvanne Aloni | 1 | 2017-06-09 22:12:04 UTC | ndm | Hi, I think something isn't right with "The Pump Rooms and Stall Street -- they seem to have an odd shape now? |
| 2 | 2017-06-10 14:32:10 UTC | DaveF | Hi Syvanne Welcome to OSM could you clarify what it is your trying to add? Most visible extents of the mediaeval wall are mapped. OSM is a database of current entities. If you wish to record historical data I recommend having a read of this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_M... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-12 10:44:38 UTC | Syvanne Aloni | Hi DaveF,Thank you for pointing this out to me. I have tried using OHM but the website seems down at the moment. Do you know anything about this? | |
| 4 | 2017-06-12 11:12:51 UTC | DaveF | Unsure of OHM's status, but OSM is not the place for razed entities. Please feel free to add any examples that still exist, adding appropriate tags. Could you also have a look at the problems NDM flagged up. Thanks. | |
| 5 | 2017-06-13 10:03:51 UTC | Syvanne Aloni | Hi DaveF, I have clarified and I am able to use OSM for mapping my data as OHM is not yet compatible with other software which I need to use. I am working with the Pleiades Gazetteer, the Institute of Classical Studies and the Roman Society to create a map of Aquae Sulis using Archeological journals... | |
| 6 | 2017-06-13 13:17:44 UTC | DaveF | HiWho did you discuss the addition of historical data to OSM with? Lack of features in other software is not a valid reason to add it to OSM. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_featuresI've had a brief read of Pleiades. I see no mention of... | |
| 7 | 2017-06-13 19:40:40 UTC | ndm | I think it probably needs to be raised on the talk-gb mailing list and maybe with the data working group -- they were great at removing edits in Bristol that added the historic HTV studio and icerink. It would be better to get some clarity -- rather than risk wasteing time on edits that could well b... | |
| 8 | 2017-06-13 22:38:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi - just for info - I've undone a node drag / node join that connected the end of the Cotswold Way to the corner of the Pump Rooms in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49514046 (based on the geometry change highlighted by http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=49401905 ).Best Regards... | |
| 49473599 by adanifina | 1 | 2017-06-12 20:03:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea ho... |
| 49318614 by Walter Schlögl | 1 | 2017-06-08 16:14:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Sherwood Cottage doesn't self-identify as a guest house; just as a bed and breakfast. I've corrected the tagging. |
| 2 | 2017-06-08 19:42:03 UTC | Walter Schlögl | Do you know, what the wiki says about that?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atourism%3Dbed_and_breakfastUse tourism=guest_house instead. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-12 08:43:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Well the wiki says a lot of things... Unfortunately it's not always a good indicator of how people map; just how one particular wiki editor (the last one to edit the page) thinks that people should map.The discussion on the tagging list back in 2013 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagg... | |
| 49436385 by Dexian Jiang | 1 | 2017-06-11 13:36:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - perhaps it was an accident, but this changed the name of the country "Vietnam" to "China". I've changed it back.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2017-06-11 13:37:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | 糟糕 - 也许这是一个意外，但是这个国家的名字“越南”改为“中国”。 我已经改回来了最好的祝福，Andy Townsend，代表OSM的数据工作组。 | |
| 49228311 by LAW3 | 1 | 2017-06-10 06:42:59 UTC | kreuzschnabel | May I ask why you changed the A46 classification from trunk to primary? According to http://ukroads.wikia.com/wiki/2-digit_primaries, it’s a primary A-road, which should be tagged highway=trunk in the UK while highway=primary means the "standard" A roads. |
| 2 | 2017-06-10 08:19:39 UTC | LAW3 | The section I upgraded to primary, was upgraded to a dual carriageway, and to the best of my knowledge is now classed as a primary road. (As parts of the A46 are)Aerial photography is still showing single carriageway/work in progress, so those who don't live 200 metres away may still class it as... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-10 10:27:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi LAW3, and welcome to OSM!The general rule in the UK for trunk roads and primary roads is green signs == trunk; white signs == primary.In OSM a trunk road fits between motorway and primary, so a change from trunk to primary is a "downgrade", not an upgrade. The A46 (especially post ... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-10 11:12:38 UTC | LAW3 | Cheers for explaining Andy. Pretty new to all this, Will change it when I get chance. | |
| 5 | 2017-06-10 12:59:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | No problem - any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask! | |
| 6 | 2017-06-11 14:20:10 UTC | SK53 | Will just add that around Flintham this section of road was updated just as soon as practicable after it opened, see my blog post from 6 years ago: http://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2011/05/along-fosse-way-mapping-new-road.html | |
| 49384416 by gab6894 | 1 | 2017-06-09 18:25:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 49342085 by malick mbao | 1 | 2017-06-07 18:44:22 UTC | Carnildo | What are you trying to do that involves drawing large, untagged outlines? |
| 2 | 2017-06-08 16:04:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that it got uploaded by mistake. I've reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49371802 .Best Regards, Andy (DWG) | |
| 49362196 by AleM_711 | 1 | 2017-06-08 12:40:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I see that you are adding and then deleting data here. If you're still testing, please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-06-08 12:41:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | (Traduzione automatica)Ciao,Vedo che state aggiungendo e poi eliminando i dati qui. Se stai ancora testando, non aggiungere i dati di prova al server OpenStreetMap Live. Se vuoi un server di test, forse https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ funziona per te?I migliori saluti,Andy | |
| 47826282 by Alex McKee | 1 | 2017-05-08 21:02:13 UTC | NorthIsland | I would not map pavements as footpaths unless there is a significant grass strip between the road and the path - or if the path is a cycle route - any opinion? |
| 2 | 2017-05-31 20:26:07 UTC | Alex McKee | Well, as a pedestrian I like to know if there's a path to walk on. There's not always. The specific tag - highway:footway or highway:path is something I always wonder about, I used to prefer highway:path as footway was reserved for public footpaths in the early days of OSM. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-07 15:44:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Another option for pavements (where there isn't a significant area of grass) is a "sidewalk=both/left/right" tag on the road itself. An example mapped like that in Gloucester is Saw Mills End: https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=17&lat=51.864487&lon=-2.21097 . | |
| 49183572 by GeoThings | 1 | 2017-06-05 11:49:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset adds shelters in the middle of the sea such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4891030217This seems unlikely - can you please explain how this happened?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2017-06-06 08:08:07 UTC | GeoThings | The wrong object is deleted. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-06 08:11:05 UTC | GeoThings | The latitude and longitude missed their hundred-number. | |
| 4 | 2017-06-06 08:12:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Given that you've added so many invalid objects in the wrong place (such as the ones in the middle of the sea) how do we know that the ones on land are in the correct place? | |
| 5 | 2017-06-06 08:24:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Re "The latitude and longitude missed their hundred-number." how did that happen? | |
| 6 | 2017-06-06 09:56:25 UTC | GeoThings | The raw data source is from Taiwan government, and there may be some incorrect data in it. We will do data clean up later. | |
| 7 | 2017-06-06 10:14:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | One of the reasons why it's important to discuss an imort before it happening is so that people can look at the data and check for this sort of problem before it happens. | |
| 8 | 2017-06-11 12:46:47 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49441534 where the changeset comment is: Discussion on changeset 49183572 seems to have stalled, and there are still objects such as node 4891030183 in the middle of the sea, so reverting these undiscussed edits (where they haven't been ... | |
| 49271332 by Daouda P GUINDO | 1 | 2017-06-06 09:07:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea ho... |
| 49270768 by DABO22 | 1 | 2017-06-06 09:05:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea ho... |
| 49182642 by GeoThings | 1 | 2017-06-02 15:16:47 UTC | Supaplex | 跑到印尼了 |
| 2 | 2017-06-05 11:41:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello GeoThingsCan you please explain 1) why objects in Indonesia were edited by an edit allegedly restricted to Taiwan?2) What the licence associated with "EMIC open data" actually says?3) Where this edit was discussed with the TW community?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behal... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-06 08:05:16 UTC | GeoThings | 1) It is the wrong position of this object, and it is fixed just now.2) EMIC, Central Emergency Operation Center , is the emergency operations center in Taiwan which is activated by the appropriate central authority of Taiwan in the event of emergency situation. The center is operated by the Natio... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-06 08:23:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi GeoThings,Thanks for your reply. Any import must follow the rules set out at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines . Can you please "fill in the gaps" and do the things that you have not yet done?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 5 | 2017-06-08 01:55:44 UTC | GeoThings | Thank you for your reminder. We are working in progress. | |
| 6 | 2017-06-08 10:19:35 UTC | GeoThings | The messed up data points are cleaned up! OSM wiki page for this import will be published soon. | |
| 7 | 2017-06-11 12:46:40 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49441534 where the changeset comment is: Discussion on changeset 49183572 seems to have stalled, and there are still objects such as node 4891030183 in the middle of the sea, so reverting these undiscussed edits (where they haven't been ... | |
| 49196299 by GeoThings | 1 | 2017-06-05 11:46:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset adds shelters in the middle of the sea such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4892097822This seems unlikely - can you please explain how this happened?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2017-06-05 11:47:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4892165031 (near the Philippines). | |
| 3 | 2017-06-06 08:07:02 UTC | GeoThings | The two objects are fixed and moved to the right place. | |
| 4 | 2017-06-06 08:14:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | How did the data get added in the wrong place originally? | |
| 5 | 2017-06-06 09:55:52 UTC | GeoThings | The raw data source is from Taiwan government, and there may be some incorrect data in it. We will do data clean up later. | |
| 6 | 2017-06-11 12:46:41 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49441534 where the changeset comment is: Discussion on changeset 49183572 seems to have stalled, and there are still objects such as node 4891030183 in the middle of the sea, so reverting these undiscussed edits (where they haven't been ... | |
| 49262683 by gorstak | 1 | 2017-06-05 10:59:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi gorstak,Is this change something that you've discussed with the Kosovan community? Obviously you're aware of the political significance here. Also in OSM you'll notice that there is a very wide variety of name styles and languages in use, though most places do omit the "Republic..."... |
| 2 | 2017-06-05 11:48:22 UTC | gorstak | Hi Andy,I have not discussed with the Kosovo community.Because of bypassing the political significance I sugest to use the title of Kosovo.This is a compromise because some countries consider that Kosovo is part of Serbia.Kosovo not recognized five EU countries : Spain Greece Slovakia Roma... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-05 13:08:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Milos,For the avoidance of doubt, the policy that OSM uses for territories where there are disputes is http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf , which says among other things: 'The OpenStreetMap community operates under the &l... | |
| 48756035 by kreuzschnabel | 1 | 2017-05-22 19:47:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | (re previous comment about mechanical edit of landuse=farm) http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2818914916/history is one in an area that I do know, and I certainly wouldn't describe it as a "place=farm". The last time I was there was a while ago, but I suspect it's still operational and sh... |
| 2 | 2017-05-22 19:52:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2699887733 is another one - it's a bit longer ago that I was there, but I don't remember anywhere that I'd describe as "place=farm" SE of Witham. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-22 22:03:13 UTC | kreuzschnabel | You see me quite baffled to learn that place=farm does not describe a farm. It seemed quite plain to me so far. I certainly did not do a mechanical edit, I only assumed this to be the proper tagging for remote farms. As this seems to be not the case, maybe we should consider a revert while I’m... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-24 12:45:20 UTC | SK53 | place=farm is generally not regarded as a valid/useful tag in the UK. Standard practice is to map actual farms with landuse=farmyard and ones which are now residential (lots) with landuse=residential. Sometimes place=locality may also be used if widely used (remote highland areas). In most of lowlan... | |
| 5 | 2017-05-30 23:26:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Re "place=farm does not describe a farm" - presumably it's a farm (based on the previous landuse=farm tagging); the thing that's in doubt is whether it's any sort of "place" or not. Of the couple of dozen farms nearest to me the only one that I can think of that might deserve th... | |
| 6 | 2017-05-31 09:22:15 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Given my edit was that wrong, it would be easy to retrieve all node["place"="farm"](user:"kreuzschnabel")(newer:"2017-05-14T00:00:00Z") from overpass-turbo and retag them to landuse=farm. That should install the previous state, as if I’d never touched th... | |
| 7 | 2017-05-31 10:29:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | An Overpass query would grab all the pre-existing place=farm as well, of which there were quite a few in Lincolnshire, which this changeset covers. | |
| 8 | 2017-05-31 11:03:34 UTC | kreuzschnabel | It wouldn’t grab them unless they were wrongly double-tagged both landuse=farm and place=farm previously. My changesets definitively did not touch anything else than landuse=farm, so nodes tagged place=farm only would not be affected. | |
| 9 | 2017-05-31 11:09:55 UTC | kreuzschnabel | My proposed query would affect 48 nodes in (roughly) Lincolnshire: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pqk, out of 6,446 total: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pql | |
| 10 | 2017-05-31 11:23:31 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Sorry, bbox is not included in shortlink. So it’shttp://overpass-api.de/api/interpreter?data=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A25%5D%3B%28node%5B%22place%22%3D%22farm%22%5D%28user%3A%22kreuzschnabel%22%29%28newer%3A%222017%2D05%2D14T00%3A00%3A00Z%22%29%2852%2E609719391566%2C%2D0%2E8843994140625%2... | |
| 11 | 2017-05-31 11:45:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Ah OK; Are you going to change these back then?Obviously there's then a survey job to do to choose between landuse=farmyard, landuse=residential, landuse=industrial place=farm etc., but that can be done later (along with the existing place=farm nodes). | |
| 12 | 2017-05-31 14:01:54 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Done in CS #49137101. - 2,723 single nodes "place=farm" within the entire UK which have been last edited by me after May 13th have been retrieved through overpass-turbo and exported to JOSM (none in N.Ireland, a dozen in Scotland, the rest in Wales and England).- They have all been... | |
| 13 | 2017-05-31 14:11:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! | |
| 49097958 by Cascafico | 1 | 2017-05-30 12:52:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.Have you any idea how incorrect latitude and longitude values could have got... |
| 2 | 2017-05-30 14:31:10 UTC | Cascafico | I Guess it was my mistake: I created a new level (CTRL-N) adding a foo node Just to see which tags JOSM preset adds for guidepost, and I forgot to delete it before upload other stuff.Sory, I'll delete it ASAP. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-30 15:57:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Ah - OK. Thanks for that. | |
| 49050533 by tropinin | 1 | 2017-05-30 07:49:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 49036708 by ninjamask | 1 | 2017-05-28 18:23:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,This is a huge changeset. I can see from whodidit that something has changed near me, but how do I find out what and why? How do you know that the changes that you have made actually match the situation on the ground? |
| 48865806 by Any845 | 1 | 2017-05-27 23:44:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Re the "not showing on map" issue, it might help to have a read of https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/178/how-often-does-the-main-mapnik-map-get-updated . The four different maps on the OSM website actual update at different rates (the "stan... |
| 48989823 by oormilavinod | 1 | 2017-05-26 15:50:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea ho... |
| 48969623 by meagercone | 1 | 2017-05-25 13:16:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 48972246 by H2Olima00 | 1 | 2017-05-25 13:02:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just checking - you've deleted a restaurant at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2572860428/history - is it really no longer there? What is in its place?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-05-25 13:03:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hola,Sólo está comprobando que has borrado un restaurante en http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2572860428/history - ¿ya no está? ¿Qué hay en su lugar?Atentamente,Andy | |
| 48972260 by H2Olima00 | 1 | 2017-05-25 13:00:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello H2Olima00,This changeset, like most of your other changesets, just has a comment "Correcciones". This doesn't help other mappers understand what changes were made and what the source was.Please do use meaningful changeset comments! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_c... |
| 2 | 2017-05-25 13:00:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hola H2Olima00,Este conjunto de cambios, al igual que la mayoría de sus otros conjuntos de cambios, sólo tiene un comentario "Correcciones". Esto no ayuda a otros mapeadores a entender qué cambios se hicieron y cuál fue la fuente.¡Por favor utilice com... | |
| 48966337 by H2Olima00 | 1 | 2017-05-25 12:54:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello H2Olima00,In this changeset you have changed the some of the names associated with Morocco http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630439 to "Spain". See http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=48966337 for the tag changes.I'm guessing that this was accidental (the border ... |
| 2 | 2017-05-25 12:55:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hola H2Olima00,En este changeset has cambiado algunos de los nombres asociados a Marruecos a "España". Http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630439 Consulte http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=48966337 para ver los cambios de etiquetas.Supongo que esto fue accidental... | |
| 48889250 by BrenoOtsuka | 1 | 2017-05-24 21:53:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 16823650 by Gavrielo | 1 | 2017-05-22 19:19:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'd be very suprised if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197180533/history is spelt correctly - "Tollemach" normally has an "e" on the end. The comment above says "double checked" - but with what? |
| 2 | 2017-05-22 20:00:29 UTC | Gavrielo | Then change it if you are sure - I revised road structure via satellite image - there was no way to double check the road name for Tollemach so I left that name as it was originally named.I only change names when 100% confirmed via photograph or seen by foot - I didn't name this road originally. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-22 20:15:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've added a note so that someone local (or driving into Grantham from the A1) can map it. | |
| 48834097 by kreuzschnabel | 1 | 2017-05-20 15:21:03 UTC | kreuzschnabel | These were the last landuse=farm on the British Isles, so please don’t add new ones :-) And just in time we were, the new carto revision (which will not render landuse=farm any more) seems to have been switched active a few hours later. |
| 2 | 2017-05-20 15:53:18 UTC | trigpoint | It was never a pressing issue, farm/farmland is of dubious values consiting of vast areas armchaired by crayonists. It.adds very little value to those of us using OSM in rural areas.Many areas close to me were poorly drawn with connections to roads/rivers (not riverbank) and I had left them until ... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-20 16:08:22 UTC | kreuzschnabel | I agree that landuse=farmland is of pretty little use (moreover, it’s not clearly defined from landuse=meadow, so there are areas already where these two collide). landuse=farmyard, on the other hand, is of higher value for the walker or bicyclist, and I wouldn’t really like to miss them... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-20 16:35:26 UTC | trigpoint | I would agree farmyard is far more important than farmland itself. It is afterall the default state of non urban areas. It is a big shame that meadow has been so badly misused, it should be a rare but useful tag. Most.is simply pasture.If we are going to map farmland we should be doing it at a muc... | |
| 5 | 2017-05-22 19:28:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi kreuzschnabel,This looks very much like a mechanical edit. Have you ever actually visited e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2876566751/history to see if it deserves any sort of "place" tag?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. | |
| 39850926 by c2r | 1 | 2017-05-22 19:16:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Does any part of the Grantham Southern Relief Road exist? I don't remember seeing it, yet the tagging on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423236384/history would suggest that it is already operational.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-05-22 22:46:03 UTC | c2r | Yes and no - the physical properties mapped do exist but it is not operational. I surveyed this with GPS walking the route last year - photos of it are on SABRE. Signs are green as the A52 for the intermediate roundabout. However, road vehicles are currently blocked by concrete blocks. The A1 ju... | |
| 48872391 by cknight | 1 | 2017-05-22 18:37:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello cknight and welcome to OpenStreetMap!You've made a number of water related edits recently (and thanks for that - OSM relies on local people to get local stuff right) however you may want to check some of the tagging that you've used (for example reservoir vs basin). Another mapper's been in... |
| 48765219 by ninjamask | 1 | 2017-05-17 17:32:16 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this is a big change and covers a large area. Please could you use meaningful changeset comments that tell other mappers what you were doing. Did you actually look at every one of the 11 pages of ways you have changed.I am sure that if as you say you were fixing josm, you would not have touch... |
| 2 | 2017-05-18 10:32:27 UTC | ninjamask | I meant, that I used the validator in JOSM to fix issues like double nodes and other auto-fixable issues. After that i fixed some issues of ways with double segments. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-20 23:07:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Please don't use rely on the validator in JOSM without manually checking every change. The JOSM validator will get some things right, but it will get some edge cases wrong as well. | |
| 48207427 by spremberger | 1 | 2017-05-20 09:20:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just for info, if you're wondering what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489926314 and the ways nearby are, they were the runways and taxiways of the former Eastmoor Aerodrome (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAF_East_Moor ). I presume that they are little more than gravel tracks now, th... |
| 48739323 by trth | 1 | 2017-05-19 18:54:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 36092421 by Eugenip22 | 1 | 2017-05-17 14:38:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Eugenip22,A recent diary entry http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/n76/diary/41274#comments has suggested that Txakur kalea https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219699471/history is actually labelled in both Basque and Spanish. The history shows that it had a "name" (set to the Spanish... |
| 2 | 2017-05-17 14:39:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | (Gutxi gorabeherako itzulpena)Kaixo Eugenip22,azkenaldiko egunkari sarrera bat http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/n76/diary/41274#comments iradoki du Txakur kalea https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219699471/history hori benetan bai euskaraz etiketatu eta Espainiako. historia erakusten du "... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-17 14:39:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | (Traducción aproximada)Hola Eugenip22,Una reciente entrada del diario http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/n76/diary/41274#comments ha sugerido que Txakur kalea https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219699471/historia está etiquetado en euskera y Español. La historia muestra que ... | |
| 48737910 by warangal | 1 | 2017-05-16 18:45:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking (in the light of previous edits) that you have actually surveyed this and verified that the name really isn't "Forest" here? I know there is a tendancy for some OSM mappers to assign "name=description", but it's always good to check.For example, I live only about... |
| 48674082 by Maturi0n | 1 | 2017-05-14 15:04:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | The changeset comment "Buildings" doesn't seem to reflect the actual changes made here.Could you explain in a bit more detail what changes were actually made? |
| 2 | 2017-05-15 07:48:08 UTC | Maturi0n | Sorry, I was lazy and didn't addjust my edit comment. I was actually only adding the name of Abkhazia in the Adyghe language, which is closely related to Abkhaz and used to be spoken in the areas bordering Abkhazia. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-15 21:08:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Ah, OK - thanks. | |
| 48335637 by Müritz-Nationalpark | 1 | 2017-05-15 21:04:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Müritz-Nationalpark,Lots of people have been trying to get in contact with you about the changes that you are making:http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5105649You haven't replied to any of these since January. Please do take the time to reply to these co... |
| 2 | 2017-05-15 21:05:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | (Ungefähre Übersetzung)Hallo Müritz-Nationalpark,Viele Leute haben versucht, mit Ihnen über die Änderungen in Kontakt zu treten, die Sie machen:Http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5105649Sie haben seit Januar keine davon beantwortet. Bitt... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-15 22:02:00 UTC | Nakaner | Hallo Müritz-Nationalpark,ich habe den Eindruck, dass du hier versuchst, die Karte deinen Wünschen entsprechend zu säubern. Ich dachte eigentlich, dass solche Zeiten vorbei sind. Ich möchte dich daher bitten, die deine Löschungen durch georeferenzierte Fotos zu belegen.\... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-20 17:08:43 UTC | Nakaner | Hallo Müritz-Nationalpark,deine Änderungen sind Thema im OpenStreetMap-Forum. Du kannst die Diskussion unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 verfolgen und bist eingeladen, dich zu Wort zu melden. Du kannst dich dort mit deinem OSM-Benutzerkonto anmelden... | |
| 5 | 2017-05-24 11:27:51 UTC | Nakaner | Hallo Müritz-Nationalpark,wenn bis Freitag, 26. Mai 2017 keine Bemühungen erkennbar sind, die offenen Fragen zu klären, werde ich am Wochenende sämtliche Änderungen des Benutzerkontos Müritz-Nationalpark vorerst zurücksetzen.Viele GrüßeMichae... | |
| 6 | 2017-06-18 20:44:13 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this rever... | |
| 30209979 by rorym | 1 | 2017-05-15 18:47:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that "ref=route" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338384368/history is a mistagging, but I've no idea what the correct tagging should be there :( |
| 2 | 2017-05-16 09:36:36 UTC | rorym | Yes that's incorrect. The Beara Way is a long distance hiking route around this pennisula ( http://www.irishtrails.ie/trail/Beara-Way/3/ ), So it should be tagged as that | |
| 39794788 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-05-15 18:26:23 UTC | ff5722 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335031789 has the tag 'abbatoir=cat'except for the fact that the key abbatoir is only used here, I don't think this business is really a slaughterhouse for cats. |
| 2 | 2017-05-15 18:39:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Strange as it may seem, as far as I could tell from the signage, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335031789 really did appear to be an abbatoir specialising in cats. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-15 18:42:53 UTC | ff5722 | Well there's a first for everything...I have to believe you on this :) | |
| 4 | 2017-05-15 18:44:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | I was pretty surprised too :) | |
| 48682589 by Yoshinion | 1 | 2017-05-14 20:34:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Any reason you've not set http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34570230/history back to "highway=secondary", which it was before the highway tag was removed?Best Regards,Andy |
| 48580533 by noteka | 1 | 2017-05-13 07:27:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87406131/history was previously a forest; are you sure it's best tagged as a park and not a forest at all? |
| 2 | 2017-05-13 07:49:49 UTC | noteka | Totally. It was created at the end of 19.th century as regular planning Manor Park so it is not a forest. I get the confusion it has the name forest in it and all but this park is also called and more recognized as "Anniņmuižas parks".Description of park: http://www.citariga.lv/lat/ima... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-13 12:56:06 UTC | AkageMuk | Hello, noteka and welcome in OSM. Although you perform right the same activity in OSM, as OSM user Diana777 peviously I should inform you about your mistakes.We welcome all new users and are glad to receive corrections to the map. At the same time, we expect the changes to improve the map, NOT S... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-13 17:15:26 UTC | richlv | even the referenced page says "...forest, also called a park"; it also says "the local council plans to convert part of the forest into a park".this should be clarified/surveyed, and if some parts have been converted to a park, they should be mapped accordingly. the whole area ... | |
| 5 | 2017-06-01 09:36:56 UTC | AkageMuk | For your information, edit war continues in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49133727 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49133791 | |
| 48573672 by mappreuss | 1 | 2017-05-11 08:11:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and long... |
| 2 | 2017-05-11 21:59:30 UTC | mappreuss | Hi, I have no idea how this node was dropped…sorry about that. I wonder if this is a JOSM bug because it looks like you reverted other nodes at this exact location and I certainly didn't drop it manually. I don’t think I even zoomed over “null island” but thanks for fixing i... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-11 22:14:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | To be honest, I think it's a JOSM bug too, since it's happened to a few other people too. So far no-one's been able to say "I did XYZ just before the problem appeared". | |
| 46420842 by dudone | 1 | 2017-05-11 10:58:31 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Hi, I saw you re-tagged some small lanes hw=service + service=driveway. I took the liberty to change them to hw=unclassified since they do not lead to a single destination only. Please keep in mind that service=driveway should be used for small driveways from public roads into private property only ... |
| 2 | 2017-05-11 14:12:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | @kreuzschnabel Please don't change service to unclassified unless you've surveyed on the ground and can see that it's council maintained or otherwise obviously qualifies as an unclassified road. I can think of plenty of highway=service roads near me that lead to more that one property, and more tha... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-11 16:53:27 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Sorry but which qualification does it actually need to be hw=unclassified? In the Wiki, I cannot find anything like "council maintained", I only find that hw=unclassified is the lowest category of public roads, while hw=service are mere access or special roads to particular places and not ... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-11 19:21:14 UTC | dudone | I think you will find that Brownber is an old estate which has now been broken up into a number of old and new residences. This was my impression when I walked through it. I cannot be 100% sure but it looked very much like a driveway and not a unclassified highway. I walked along the path from th... | |
| 5 | 2017-05-11 19:51:33 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Changed them back to hw=service but would still prefer to leave it that way. The driveway issue needs a general discussion IMHO since it’s interpreted in such different ways: some mappers use it as a default for any small lane, while for most renderers that makes them far less important than u... | |
| 48572532 by MattDodson | 1 | 2017-05-11 08:06:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 48531047 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-05-10 14:10:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Rowland,You've not added a changeset comment here, so it's difficult to understand what's going on. Also, what does "created by=Tayberry" mean? Is that something that you've used to import or otherwise process this data?Please do use meaningful changeset comments so that other ... |
| 48452836 by mueschel | 1 | 2017-05-09 18:57:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! |
| 48533533 by Diana777 | 1 | 2017-05-09 15:21:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Was this change following community discussion, as was suggested? Previous comments had suggested that a number of people thought that a "leisure=park" tag wasn't appropriate here. |
| 2 | 2017-05-10 08:42:38 UTC | AkageMuk | Dear, SomeoneElse! Unfortunately no discussion on this change was made within Latvian OSM community. The edit war seem to continue. | |
| 48528605 by nbcaldon | 1 | 2017-05-09 12:36:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for fixing! |
| 48515996 by VlIvYur | 1 | 2017-05-09 09:02:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just a quick note about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261166184 here - you've moved it to match the Bing imagery, but that is clearly offset with regard to the GPS traces. There are enough either side of the B6020 to align the imagery properly, and if you do that you'll notice that that buildin... |
| 2 | 2017-06-26 20:27:58 UTC | VlIvYur | You can't rely on gps traces in curves due to inertia. You need long straight intersecting lines. And You can find them on the East: Kingsway / Station street; on the West: Sutton road / Chapel street. And you'll see there no need to align images.Also there are no fresh gps traces here, and the av... | |
| 48409154 by PeteSport | 1 | 2017-05-07 14:40:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add "game features" such as a "Parque dos pokémon" to OpenStreetMap. If there's something really there on the ground and it's really called that then please map it, but if it only appears in a game, please don't!.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-05-07 14:41:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hola,Por favor, no agregue "características del juego" como un "Parque dos pokémon" a OpenStreetMap. Si hay algo realmente en el suelo y es realmente llamado, entonces por favor, map, pero si sólo aparece en un juego, por favor, no !.Atentamente,Andy | |
| 3 | 2017-05-08 15:33:18 UTC | PeteSport | Hi.I don't add "game features" such as a "Parque dos pokémon"... I have a mistake and my tablet's keyboard replace automatically the name: " Parque dos PEQUENOS" to "Parque dos POKEMONS"... in my lenguage ( Galician) "childrens" means "... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-08 16:43:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Haha - thanks for that. Are you going to fix the name? | |
| 5 | 2017-05-08 18:53:14 UTC | AlbaKrlos23 | Yes, I fix the name to "Parque dos Pequenos" sorry and thank you to advise me.Best regards. | |
| 6 | 2017-05-08 18:57:38 UTC | PeteSport | Hi,Ok. Thanks AlbaKrlos23 to fix the name. | |
| 7 | 2017-05-08 19:07:51 UTC | AlbaKrlos23 | You´re welcome PeteSport | |
| 48449696 by Draqunov | 1 | 2017-05-08 13:52:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4838391421 really a picnic site within a building, or it it perhaps a bench or food court?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-05-08 13:54:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | مرحبا،هو https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4838391421 حقا موقع نزهة داخل مبنى، أو أنه ربما مقعد أو محكمة الغذاء؟تحياتي الحارة،أندي | |
| 48352481 by Noer Hafidh | 1 | 2017-05-08 13:51:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491030108/history but it seems to overlap and be a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263939032/history which has existed since 2014.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-05-08 13:51:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Halo,Anda telah menambahkan https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491030108/history namun tampaknya tumpang tindih dan menjadi duplikat https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263939032/history yang telah ada sejak tahun 2014.Salam Hormat,Andy | |
| 48352134 by iqbal96 | 1 | 2017-05-08 13:49:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added "building=yes" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491026046 but it doesn't look like a building, just an area in which there are several buildings?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-05-08 13:49:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Halo,Anda telah menambahkan "building = yes" di https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491026046 namun tidak terlihat seperti bangunan, hanya area di mana ada beberapa bangunan?Salam Hormat,Andy | |
| 48042765 by VlIvYur | 1 | 2017-05-07 15:09:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added a footpath https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488741439 . Are you sure that that actually exists, and that there is really no access from it to the junction of Pelham Road / Regent Street? Regent Street is sidewalk=both (or was the last time I went past it). Are you really say... |
| 2 | 2017-05-07 23:45:32 UTC | VlIvYur | Of course I'm not sure - at first, I have only Bing images.Second, sidewalk=* is a temporary tag and should be replaced by drawn highway=footway. After that sidewalk=* may be removed, so there will be only one footway.As for access from it to junction, I don't know local laws about crossing stre... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-08 11:24:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Second, sidewalk=* is a temporary tag and should be replaced by drawn highway=footway. No, it's not a temporary tag. It's a permanent tag to indicate that a sidewalk that is part of the road infrastructure exists.Depending on the local environment it may be more appropriate to tag sidewa... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-26 20:03:52 UTC | VlIvYur | Sorry, I was too far from Internetsidewalk=* are difficult to support (roll of tags on way) and didn't displays the real state of things. You can't tag slopes for wheelchair, different pavement, widths for sides etc. It's only path graph (for drivers) not map.Why (For what?) there are marked cro... | |
| 48271977 by MacaroniHomie | 1 | 2017-05-07 14:43:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello MacaroniHomie,OpenStreetMap's a map of things that really exist, so if there isn't a meadow on your house, please don't map one there.Sorry about that...Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-05-08 03:48:27 UTC | MacaroniHomie | It's okay. I got rid of it. There's no spawn points anyways. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-08 11:11:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! | |
| 48448689 by dmgroom_ct | 1 | 2017-05-07 15:04:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure that there is no access from the road to the path at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4810318439 ?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-05-07 15:21:48 UTC | dmgroom_ct | I had considered that the footpath network adjacent to regent street was adequate to provide foot routing, but on reflection that nay not be the case, so I have removed the noexit tag and added a short section of footway | |
| 3 | 2017-05-07 19:17:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Does it actually match the on-the-ground situation though? I'm not convinced that there are two parallel footways either side of Regent Street (and I've seperately commented in a changeset of the user that added them).Have you been there to have a look? | |
| 4 | 2017-05-07 20:00:28 UTC | dmgroom_ct | no, I've not | |
| 5 | 2017-05-07 20:04:20 UTC | dmgroom_ct | But the Bing imagery does seem to show two parallel footways, at least at the part of Regent Street north of Hartley Road | |
| 48450070 by Imperator Lrrr | 1 | 2017-05-07 15:00:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and long... |
| 2 | 2017-09-06 07:32:58 UTC | Imperator Lrrr | NOW I know how I did it: Shift+D in JOSM. | |
| 44604841 by Θοδωρής Θεοδώρου | 1 | 2017-05-07 14:37:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add "game features" such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4567649976 to OpenStreetMap. If there's something really there on the ground, map it, but if it only appears in a game, please don't.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-05-07 14:37:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Χαίρετε,Μην προσθέτετε "δυνατότητες παιχνιδιού" όπως το http:... | |
| 48266814 by Balakhadze | 1 | 2017-05-07 12:01:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Balakhadze,Can you please use more meaningful changeset comments than "Needed change"? That doesn't really explain what you did and why.Best Regards,Andy |
| 48393284 by Derby45 | 1 | 2017-05-07 11:55:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Personally I wouldn't set too much store by the OSM wiki :)If something looks like a cycleway, I'd map it as one.Cheers,Andy |
| 48372005 by Nikos Andreas Gls | 1 | 2017-05-07 11:39:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are the name of all of these features such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491169857really called "Garden"?Best Regards,Andy |
| 36985838 by abc26324 | 1 | 2017-05-04 08:55:52 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Some of these springs look more than suspicious to me – invisible on Bing imagery, right in the middle of fields. Where did that information come from? Would be great btw if you could comment your changesets (short description: what kinds of changes have been done), and specify your source... |
| 2 | 2017-05-05 15:54:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Given that so much in this changeset such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3986928355 (and unfortunately many of this mapper's other contributions) is obviously rubbish then in the absense of any explanation I'd be tempted to just revert this. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-05 16:07:01 UTC | kreuzschnabel | I strongly second this, just wanted to assume good faith first – maybe something went wrong in a well-purposed edit. | |
| 48425478 by CartogLarry | 1 | 2017-05-05 15:38:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | You might find that https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=14&lat=53.16751&lon=-1.08988 gives a better picture of Sherwood Pines (tree types, for example). |
| 47959634 by nammala | 1 | 2017-05-05 09:41:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you explain what you mean by "fixed the tagging"? http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=47950158 shows a geometry change; did you verify that? If not, please don't make changes like this - it makes fixing things properly much harder.Please instead either let someone who ca... |
| 2 | 2017-05-05 10:41:44 UTC | nammala | Hi Andy, Here I changed the park tag to wood and I din't change any geometry. As per the imagery I changed to wood rather than park. From next time, I will definitely let the user know about this and wait for him to change and let others know about this.Thanks for flagging this Andy.Best R... | |
| 48354795 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-05-03 20:16:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | This follows on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48258464 - see the comment there. |
| 48337423 by Chris Devall | 1 | 2017-05-03 09:53:51 UTC | Derby45 | See comment as to changeset 48337508 |
| 2 | 2017-05-03 12:45:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Chris,Welcome to OpenStreetMap!You've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108176084 so that it's not recognised as any kind of highway at all - presumably that was by mistake?Can you explain what you were trying to do?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 47950853 by PbfootBully | 1 | 2017-04-20 18:10:26 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please could you add some more detail to the artworks. A pub car park is an odd place for an artwork.Thanks Phil |
| 2 | 2017-04-28 09:06:43 UTC | Derby45 | Phil, I think this person is just messing about. There are a few changes by this person in the area. I have just cleaned up a set of paths that have been dragged all over the place in this users changeset, also with Artwork randomly placed that doesn't exist. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-03 12:39:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've never been to that pub but I've commneted on another one that I don't think exists: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47950670 . | |
| 4 | 2017-05-05 09:30:50 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48420321 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Pokemon-inspired edits and other fiction. Attempts to contact the mapper have failed. | |
| 47950670 by PbfootBully | 1 | 2017-05-03 12:37:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you explain what "Old Ben" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4804532628 is? It's a while since I've walked down here but I don't remember anything at the end of this path.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-05-05 09:30:54 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48420321 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Pokemon-inspired edits and other fiction. Attempts to contact the mapper have failed. | |
| 34868496 by Irk_Ley | 1 | 2017-05-03 06:44:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You have added 5 schools at exactly the same location at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3802693408 . This also appears to be in the middle of the road. Do these 5 schools occupy different parts of one large building? If so, please map the building and move the nodes to appropriate pla... |
| 48314612 by griffou83 | 1 | 2017-05-02 10:09:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.Have you any idea how incorrect latitude and lo... |
| 2 | 2017-05-02 10:10:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap!Comme vous pouvez le voir à partir de la ligne orange autour de cette modification sur la carte à droite lorsque vous affichez le set de modifications sur le site OpenStreetMap, cela chevauche l'Atlantique car certaines données ont &eacut... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-02 11:49:27 UTC | griffou83 | Hi Andy, yes I have an idea of the problem ; when I tried to add a node to an existing path, the app (JOSM) added a free node at (0,0) coordinates. I thought I suppressed it afterwards, but maybe it wasn't the case, that's why you saw it. It seems you already suppressed it.. ? | |
| 4 | 2017-05-02 12:12:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you could reproduce it (maybe using the test server?) it'd be great to add an issue at https://josm.openstreetmap.de/newticket . I've seen it happen to a few people - they're happily mapping away in their home area and then oops! A node appears at 0,0. | |
| 48325430 by parabubu | 1 | 2017-05-02 10:13:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.Have you any idea how incorrect latitude and lo... |
| 2 | 2017-05-02 10:14:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Halo dan selamat datang di OpenStreetMap!Seperti yang dapat Anda lihat dari garis oranye di sekitar perubahan ini pada peta di sebelah kanan saat Anda melihat changeset di situs OpenStreetMap, itu tumpang tindih dengan Atlantik karena beberapa data tidak sengaja ditambahkan di sana.Sudahkah Anda... | |
| 48320558 by Nikos Andreas Gls | 1 | 2017-05-02 09:34:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello "Nikos Andreas Gls",Can you explain what "OSM operation and validation succesful" means?Best Regards,Andy |
| 48231898 by osm update | 1 | 2017-04-28 16:36:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | As noted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1331 this mechanical edit is still technically flawed and legally questionable. In addition to all of the other issues already raised, you are performing multiple edits to objects for no apparent reason. |
| 48186273 by osm update | 1 | 2017-04-27 10:56:25 UTC | manoharuss | Hi osm update,This seems like automated edit to me with a custom script. Has this been discussed and documented? What is the source of this data?I have observed some issues with the edits.1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/338794056/history is a node of a way on a remote area. I don't s... |
| 2 | 2017-04-27 12:03:12 UTC | althio | Hi,I agree with manoharuss on this changeset, dear user "osm update".It seems like you rely too heavily on nodes ids.I would also suggest you use better changeset comments.Moreover you could try to reduce the successive numbers of versions for only adding tags to one object.\... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-27 13:31:29 UTC | osm update | Hi, the source is http://min-go.hr/, but I've made a mistake in my script. I'm reverting changes. | |
| 4 | 2017-04-27 15:15:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Apparantly an otherwise untagged node on a footpath near me https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/339830304/history now sells LPG. Do I need to bring my own can?Regards,Andy(who as well as mapping footpaths moonlights for the Data Working Group) | |
| 5 | 2017-04-27 19:09:52 UTC | ndm | Umm, http://min-go.hr seems to be based on Google Maps? Wouldn't that taint data from it? | |
| 6 | 2017-04-28 07:17:57 UTC | osm update | No, it's not based on Google Maps. There are three json sources of information about gas stations and prices:- http://min-go.hr/cache/postajasve.json- http://min-go.hr/cache/vazeca-cijena.json- http://min-go.hr/api/web_api/web/obveznik | |
| 7 | 2017-04-28 15:36:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | You have been blocked because you are continue to mechanically edit data without discussion. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1331 made clear the process that you must follow if you want to do this. The data that you have modified since this changeset will be reverted. Please re-read htt... | |
| 47656314 by Permafrozen | 1 | 2017-04-27 22:27:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I've always wondered what http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/698093265 was supposed to be! |
| 48190865 by Chiem | 1 | 2017-04-27 11:34:45 UTC | Commodoortje | Zo te zien heb je hier helemaal gelijk.In de BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) staat dit schuurtje niet vermeld.https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#/?searchQuery=13%20Beatrixstraat%20Groenlo&resultOffset=0&objectId=1586100000021100&geometry.x=238701.... |
| 2 | 2017-04-27 12:44:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Commodoortje Interestingly Bing and Mapbox satellite both show the extension - it it really likely that it has been demolished, or is BAG perhaps just out of date here? | |
| 3 | 2017-04-27 12:52:04 UTC | Commodoortje | Yes it is. BAG is in this case not actual. | |
| 48094899 by eggie | 1 | 2017-04-26 08:10:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain why you removed the detailed tags from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263723286/history and added it to the address node instead? Also, "reverted due to ignorance" isn't a very helpful changeset comment if, as here, the features were added by a new mapper.Best... |
| 2 | 2017-04-26 08:42:55 UTC | eggie | This was the last changeset in a range of lots of wrong and good tags. We got no response at the changesets. Only in a personal message. We askes the mapper to stop for the moment but we got no response. By the way I fixed this edit and all the informatie is at the adressnode now as an example for s... | |
| 48145275 by rivage | 1 | 2017-04-26 07:21:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Can you explain why you deleted the shops such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3715328045/history on this street? Are they really no longer there any more?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-04-26 07:52:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bonjour et bienvenue à OpenStreetMap!Pouvez-vous expliquer pourquoi vous avez supprimé les magasins tels que http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3715328045/history commentaires sur cette rue? Sont-ils vraiment plus là plus?Cordialement,Andy | |
| 3 | 2017-05-05 07:48:31 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48417098 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some deletions and other odd edits. An attempt to contact the mapper failed. | |
| 48122711 by Binyomin Binet | 1 | 2017-04-25 15:54:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain the reason for the building deletions in here such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42558687/history ? That still exists on the imagery. Has it really been demolished?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-04-25 15:54:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | העלא,קענען איר דערקלערן די סיבה פֿאַר דעם בנין דאָ: אַזאַ ווי אויסמעקונגען אין http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42558687/history? אַז נאָך יגזיסץ אויף די ימאַדזשרי. שוין טאַקע האָבן עס די... | |
| 45729080 by Aleks-Berlin | 1 | 2017-04-25 15:36:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I'd suggest actually checking these in a bit more detail before you mechanically edit them - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4300814810/history is clearly just garbage (and was the subject of a previous revert).Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-04-25 18:10:26 UTC | Aleks-Berlin | Hi Andy, actually the decision how far a fix should be is not htat easy. One the one hand we should "respect the work of others" (and not delete a likely bad name-tag). But I would also like to reach a state in OSM, that makes it more easy useable (less exceptions, country specific rules, ... | |
| 48087689 by AkageMuk | 1 | 2017-04-25 07:57:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just for info I've added a 0-hour block at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1328 and reverted to the pre-edit-war situation in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48114086 . |
| 40027234 by Electric Monk | 1 | 2017-04-22 08:26:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Please don't duplicate data - if something you're using to search for pubs doesn't find pubs mapped as ways it'll miss a lot of pubs (roughly a third in the UK - http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/tags/amenity=pub ) |
| 2 | 2017-04-24 22:53:57 UTC | Electric Monk | I suggest you go to Overpass Turbo and look at the example query that comes up. Points Of Interest are called "points" for a reason. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-24 23:13:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Er, OK....In http://overpass-turbo.eu/ if I click "wizard", type in "pub" and "build query" I get http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/oBt which searches for amenity=pub on nodes, ways and relations.Can you explain where you got the idea that POIs should be mapped as node... | |
| 47403489 by geo_2016 | 1 | 2017-04-03 09:17:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - does the ISO code that you've added here apply to:1) The territory held by the Polisario Front2) The former state of Western SaharaAs you may be aware, there is more than one claim over the latter. If the answer is "2" then these iso codes don't belong here.Best Re... |
| 2 | 2017-04-24 18:24:59 UTC | geo_2016 | hi i'm sorry i think my "fix" was a bit too fast and not thought through entirely.should i or would your reverse it (delete the iso3166 code?) | |
| 3 | 2017-04-24 20:05:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I've already done it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47953850 .Thanks,Andy | |
| 47981886 by wongataa | 1 | 2017-04-21 15:01:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you explain what you mean by "invalid layer tag"?Layer tags are relative, so "layer=-1" or "layer=-100" isn't any more valid or invalid than "layer=0" or an implied layer=0, if all crossing features have positive layer tags.What problem are you trying ... |
| 2 | 2017-04-22 07:45:23 UTC | wongataa | I should have put some more detail in. These layer tags were not used in conjunction with any other tags such as bridge or tunnel. The features in question could also be clearly seen at surface level on the satellite imagery and were tagged as layer -1. The layer tags were applied in error as the... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-22 08:43:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Again, to be clear, _layer tags are relative_. Layer 0 does _not_ imply ground level.Again, what _actual problem_ are you trying to solve? | |
| 4 | 2017-04-22 16:30:10 UTC | trigpoint | There are more changes here than your stated incorrect layer.You have also changed oneway=-1 to oneway=yes on way 204098940 thus reversing the direction of travel for that section | |
| 47947482 by wongataa | 1 | 2017-04-21 14:32:59 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please can you point me to where this mechanical edit was discussed?You seem to have mechanically armchaired layer=1 onto bridges with no survey, if you had you would have seen that the bridge should be at layer=0 and maybe whatever is below them needs a later=-1 where it is below ground level... |
| 2 | 2017-04-22 07:51:54 UTC | wongataa | All bridges need a layer tag of 1 or higher. This is detailed in the OSM wiki on the bridge page. It doesn't matter if the bridge is a simple plank or not. It is above ground level.In that mapillary link the bridge needs a layer tag as it crosses a river/canal. The layer is to show where a f... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-22 08:38:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Firstly - please take the wiki with a bucketload of salt :)Secondly - layer=0 doesn't imply ground level - layer tags are relative, so "All bridges need a layer tag of 1 or higher" is simply wrong. Also, although it is possible to infer relative level from imagery and other sources, i... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-29 17:50:29 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48258464 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical changes to layers. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1325 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=133272 | |
| 43583909 by lequack | 1 | 2017-04-21 13:42:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-04-21 18:47:10 UTC | lequack | Yes apologies for that Andy. It was a mistake, can I revert those additions? | |
| 3 | 2017-04-21 18:56:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's OK; I've reverted them.Thanks,Andy | |
| 48007382 by Saleh Etdin | 1 | 2017-04-21 16:10:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,In this changeset you've changed the name of this place from the Armenian name to to an anglicized version of the the Azerbaijani name.Your changeset comment "Something wrong explained" unfortunately does not explain what the problem was and why you changed it.Could you explain... |
| 47992495 by CorinaM2015 | 1 | 2017-04-21 13:31:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - you've added this one-node building in the middle of the Atlantic at latitude 0, longitude 0. I guess that this means that OsmAnd didn't have a valid location when you added it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 46849184 by brianboru | 1 | 2017-03-14 18:37:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Brian,You're still not using a separate import account, you're using a #gibberish changeset discussion comment and you're importing duplicates of existing data rather than conflating (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4734765468 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4149470376).Are you... |
| 2 | 2017-04-17 09:39:40 UTC | brianboru | I don't believe these are duplicate nodes but bus stops on opposite sides of the road, so conflation not appropriate. Duplicates are being reviewed manually to check which position is accurate I'm using my own account only to do a manual post-import review and cleanup of nodes. Not as neat as pur... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-19 23:27:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks Brian.Just one question - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/wmca doesn't seem to be a valid account?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2017-04-20 12:25:00 UTC | brianboru | Sorry Andy - so used to abbreviating it. The username is West Midlands Combined Authority. This also came through on email this timme!Brian | |
| 5 | 2017-04-20 13:26:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks Brian - and yay for email appearing! | |
| 47924997 by British Passports UK | 1 | 2017-04-19 23:14:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,In this edit you've deleted the clothes shop that was downstairs - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47924997 - was that deliberate?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-04-20 04:29:42 UTC | British Passports UK | Sorry, it may be by mistake I will delete my listingRegards Steve | |
| 47434147 by nammala | 1 | 2017-04-19 22:17:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Unfortunately this "fake park" that you deleted here was actually a school originally!https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23646951/historyI've reverted it and patched it up with P1.Best Regards,Andy |
| 47784601 by Arnaud D-SIDD | 1 | 2017-04-16 16:32:48 UTC | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong with this import. The nodes are spread over the ocean...Also, "Adresse" and "Nom" are no common tags in OSM and should be properly tagged.Jan |
| 2 | 2017-04-19 21:52:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | @mueschel no reply here so I've reverted these additions and sent the user a message that they have to read before continuing editing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1320 .Best Regards,Andy | |
| 47930917 by nammala | 1 | 2017-04-19 10:24:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Er,You've deleted the weather buoy at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900/historyWas this intentional?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-04-19 11:56:43 UTC | nammala | Hi andy,This is accidental, It might have deleted when I was reverting this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47788862?node_page=2 , which has null island edits . Could you please bring back the buoy edits.Regards,nammala | |
| 3 | 2017-04-19 21:34:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I've undeleted it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47952895 . | |
| 4 | 2017-04-20 04:03:57 UTC | nammala | Thanks andy . | |
| 47030425 by Eva Blue | 1 | 2017-03-21 11:14:11 UTC | imagico | Hello Eva,your edits claims to be based on Bing imagery but Bing apparently has no coverage in this area. Could you explain the basis of this edit? |
| 2 | 2017-03-21 21:33:01 UTC | Eva Blue | Hi imagico, I figured that even without imagery I could make some improvements to the shoreline if there are sharp angles that are unreasonable for a shoreline. However you bring up a good point and I will avoid editing when no resources are available. Thank you. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-19 09:30:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Eva,Please don't update OSM based on guesswork!Best Regards,Andy | |
| 47114137 by James Millar | 1 | 2017-03-28 21:50:36 UTC | woodpeck | You have aligned this one island with Bing imagery, but the three nearby islands were horribly out of sync with imagery and you haven't even made an attempt to repair them too. Why the focus on this one island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instruct... |
| 2 | 2017-03-30 02:43:25 UTC | James Millar | I found this island through a MapRoulette challenge, I’m part of a small group who are attempting to improve the alignment of these islands using MapRoulette and JOSM. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-18 10:15:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi James.There have been worrying changes such as this elsewhere; you simply can't rely on Bing imagery where it might be offset (which is anywhere that you don't have something else to corroborate it).Can you explain who the "small group" are? Your profile doesn't say anything abou... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-19 02:09:13 UTC | James Millar | Hi Andy,We also use Mapbox, and by using a combination we can usually make improvements to these islands regardless of potential Bing offset. Alternatively we make the decision to not make any edits in an area (we do this often). Can you point me to some of the worrying changes? I can always fix t... | |
| 5 | 2017-04-19 07:58:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Re "worrying changes", you can see a discussion with comments at http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/imagico/diary/40759 .Also, you're saying "we" again. Who exactly are "we"?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 47898820 by James Millar | 1 | 2017-04-18 10:17:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi James, as per the comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47114137 can you explain how you know the alignment is correct here? Can you describe what you did to check it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-04-19 02:05:43 UTC | James Millar | Hi Andy,Thanks for the comment.https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47898820 I think that this small island looks better now due to these changes. Do you know if Bing is offset here? It would be great to know for sure, but until then this feature has been improved significantly accor... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-19 07:51:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi James,Unfortunately "looks better" doesn't always mean "is better" - if it's in the wrong place, it's still wrong, like Monty Python's parrot with the "beautiful plumage" is still dead.In this case there don't seem to be any local GPS traces (even on the nearby h... | |
| 47895813 by Kate Diaz | 1 | 2017-04-18 11:57:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As explained previously (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44699065 ) Bing imagery may be out of date or offset. Can you explain what steps that you took here and in your other changesets in order ensure that this was not a problem?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-04-19 01:28:26 UTC | Kate Diaz | Hi Andy,Thanks for the comment. Do you have any resources that indicate that Bing is offset here or that the island has changed? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47895813 I believe that the island now better reflects reality due to my edits and that these changes improve the map incre... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-19 03:13:47 UTC | TheSwavu | Bing imagery in this area is off by 4 to 5 m. | |
| 4 | 2017-04-19 07:39:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Re "resources that indicate that Bing is offset here" I'd offer "experience".Various things can be used to determine a Bing offset - underlying GPS traces and other imagery layers among them. I've certainly used the AGRI imagery together with GPS traces (my own and others) in ... | |
| 47898251 by Jason Roy | 1 | 2017-04-18 11:53:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,A month ago someone mentioned that Bing imagery might be offset (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46862647#map=15/60.5123/28.6651&layers=N ). Can you explain what you're doing here to avoid problems caused by offset imagery?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-04-19 04:56:29 UTC | Jason Roy | Hey Andy,Before this changeset, this island was traced badly. There were jagged edges which do not reflect reality. The changes I made were minor but do improve the outline as seen in achavi here:https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47898251 Do you have anything that shows Bing is... | |
| 47885397 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-04-17 21:04:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Whilst can be contentious mapping temporary closures in OSM, I guess that 6 weeks of remaining closure is enough to make it worthwhile mapping it. |
| 39508436 by JayCBR | 1 | 2016-07-11 06:52:24 UTC | Jothirnadh | Hello JayCBR,Came across this changesets and found that you deleted the names of this street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278489664/historyYour changeset also didn't have any proper comment, so not able to quantify the reason of deleting these tags. Can you please specify the reason. Al... |
| 2 | 2016-07-11 08:53:07 UTC | JayCBR | well there is a restructuring of provincial roads in progress and this area is not complete yet (ΕΟ3β is a branch of the main way and havent decided on a name at the time)..i do most of my edits with P2 and when i save is because ram is running out, so no time for comments | |
| 3 | 2017-04-17 11:14:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi JayCBR,If you have to save in an emergency and aren't able to leave a suitable comment, you could always return to the changeset later and add a comment in the changeset discussion. That way other mappers will still be able to see what the changeset was about.Hope you don't mind me mentionin... | |
| 47682574 by Salkin74 | 1 | 2017-04-17 10:50:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've tagged a cycleway here as "highway=Cykelväg". In order for everyone to be able to understand the data, you'll want to change this to "highway=cycleway.Best Regards,Andy |
| 28734701 by Lindisfarne | 1 | 2017-04-17 10:42:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Lindisfarne,The tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327300037 suggest that it has been imported from an external source.Can you explain where it was imported from and what the licence for that was?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2017-04-18 21:54:10 UTC | JohanMax | Hello Andy,I used data from an forestryplan, originated from lantmäteriverket, fastighetskartan. My mistake, all the other datasets are from lantmäteriverket are free data but fastighetskartan are not. I have removed the data.Best regards,Johan | |
| 22544906 by Yorvik Prestigitator | 1 | 2017-04-14 09:56:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just trying to understand the "motor_vehicle=designated" on St Andrewgate http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69693516/history . This normally means "there's explicit signage or something else that indicates that motor vehicle traffic should go down here".Best Regards,A... |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 10:21:36 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | Hmm, that edit was 3 years ago, perhaps it was signed "access only", but since St A'gate (and surrounding streets) is effectively a dead-end for motor vehicles, that sems unecesssary. I will have another survey this week. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-14 11:43:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | I didn't notice any signage on St Andrewgate itself last night, but TBH you wouldn't expect any since car access is from near the Black Swan. Cheers,Andy | |
| 47663047 by Firemark | 1 | 2017-04-11 19:37:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Is "Edwinstowe Cricket Club" really a sports shop or actually a cricket club or cricket pavilion? I know you're a bit limited with MAPS.ME - it doesn't let you tag everything how you'd like to. If it isn't a shop let me know and I can change it to som... |
| 47648719 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-04-11 19:34:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Would it be possible to explain what "remove self intersecting section of area outline" means?Best Regards,Andy |
| 47546592 by ti-lo | 1 | 2017-04-08 09:07:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just a quick point about "For standardisation (make it possible to filter for this), ":It's entirely possible to filter for whatever mappers tag things as, whatever you're using to consumer the data, For rendering, osm2pgsql supports lua (see https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneEls... |
| 2 | 2017-04-08 14:36:15 UTC | ti-lo | It's not about "to match an obscure scheme that on an unrelated web page that no-one is likely to read", it's about using a scheme which is easier to understand for the users (main Key shop=mototrcycle, sub-Keys motorcycle:*=*) and avoids confusion about different ways to tag the same thin... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-11 15:50:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you're making changes based on a wiki page (that likely no-one else has read) you still need to follow the mechanical edit process https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct . It's not fair on mappers or data consumers just to change the structure of the data without tal... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-11 17:05:32 UTC | ti-lo | I talked to the data consumers (which weren't consuming the "service" tags up to now). The major problem were the "motorcycle_repair" tags, which have also been "invented" without proper discussion, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle_repa... | |
| 47649816 by timwenzel98 | 1 | 2017-04-11 13:21:23 UTC | will_p | Hi,What is the purpose of adding an elevation for an entire city? To me this usage of the ele tag seems likely to cause confusion, because the ele tag is usually used to provide an accurate elevation at a particular point, whereas this is something much more vague. Many different heights could b... |
| 2 | 2017-04-11 15:35:11 UTC | timwenzel98 | Hi Will,thank you for opening the discussion. The elevation for an entire city can be useful in some circumstances when using specific mobile apps (maps.me for instance), i added the official elevation of a town, each for their own measurement. It of course would be nice to have the elevation of... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-11 15:41:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Tim,Where did you measure the elevation? If you didn't measure it, where did you copy the information from?Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2017-04-11 17:16:05 UTC | SK53 | There is no such thing as an official elevation of towns/cities in the UK. This seems to be more common in Europe and is indeed often shown on conventional topo maps. In Britain only spot heights are shown.Adding an ele on an area is furthermore absurd. Elevations in Nottingham vary between arou... | |
| 47472543 by poornibadrinath | 1 | 2017-04-08 09:33:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi poornibadrinath,As can be seen from http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=234061921 this town has been through a number of name changes over the years!I'm not convinced that having anglicised versions of Azerbaijani or Armenian names here makes sense. These were added in the previouse cha... |
| 2 | 2017-04-10 06:28:14 UTC | poornibadrinath | Hi Andy, When I came across this changeset and searched for the name Agdara, a wikipedia entry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aghdara_(town) had two names for the same place: Aghdara and Mertakert. That's why I added the alt name tag. Wasn't aware that this town was always referred to as Mertaker... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-10 21:27:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Poornima,Thanks for your reply. I don't think that this town "was always referred to as Mertakert" - I suspect that it's official name will have varied depending on which side of the border it happened to be at the time. http://military.wikia.com/wiki/Operation_Goranboy suggests tha... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-13 06:19:30 UTC | poornibadrinath | HI Andy,Thanks for the clarification. I checked around to see if there are any other concrete sources but couldn't find any. I agree that may be the version 24 remains the best compromise on names. I will go ahead and change the name to how it was in your changeset. Thanks again.Best,Poornim... | |
| 47604117 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-04-09 21:28:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | The untagged names in here (e.g. "Antenatal") aren't errors, they're just placeholders for department locations that will need tags adding once I (or someone else) has figured out a sensible way to tag them. |
| 47432195 by Aleks-Berlin | 1 | 2017-04-08 10:12:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi - just for info, I've changed the wiki link from here from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Nagorno-Karabakh to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Nagorno-Karabakh%20Republic , because that's what this entity is (admin level 3 for disputed statelet, not the region, or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... |
| 47546572 by ti-lo | 1 | 2017-04-07 22:36:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | This looks remarkably like a mechanical edit (just changing one tag to another). Was it discussed anywhere? |
| 47553864 by オプンストリトマップ | 1 | 2017-04-07 22:27:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!One small thing - you're naming each changeset "small corrections". This doesn't really help explain to other mappers what change you're making and what the source of that change was. It'd help other mappers if you could explain in a little more detai... |
| 2 | 2017-04-08 06:30:21 UTC | dgitto | Please do not change names. The name was via 4 novembre, as stated in the wiki page about the "name with dates" in italy (linked to you lot of times).Moreover, if you change the tag name, pay attention to change accordingly the tag addr:street into each housenumber | |
| 3 | 2017-04-08 20:35:55 UTC | オプンストリトマップ | OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe th... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-08 20:41:00 UTC | オプンストリトマップ | in this street af acitrezza signal there's it is written "Via IV November" with roman numbers, not the common numbers for several historic and cultural reasons. i've been there and i know it. and the local people from acitrezza are just fine with it. Via 4 Novembre could be an alt_name | |
| 5 | 2017-04-08 21:22:12 UTC | dgitto | Ahh sorry. You are YOU. Sorry. Cheers | |
| 6 | 2017-04-08 21:23:46 UTC | オプンストリトマップ | roman numbers again https://www.tripadvisor.it/Restaurant_Review-g1028935-d10750544-Reviews-Pizzeria_Ai_Quattro_Canti-Aci_Castello_Province_of_Catania_Sicily.html | |
| 7 | 2017-04-08 21:27:01 UTC | オプンストリトマップ | roman numbers in historic date name streets again and again https://tinyurl.com/lnglh85 | |
| 47461811 by Alicia Keys | 1 | 2017-04-07 14:48:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Just a couple of points - you've aligned two islands to Bing here, and they're a long way apart, so your changeset covers most of 4 continents. It'd be better if you could try and restrict the area covered by changesets so that everyone's "history" lis... |
| 26752192 by FrViPofm | 1 | 2014-11-14 17:37:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | I notice that this large changeset removes the "drinkable=yes" tag from e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/966339776/history . Was this change discussed anywhere so that anyone previously rendering "drinkable=yes" on a map would no to update it before this change was made? |
| 2 | 2014-11-14 17:39:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also, the changeset comment "water" really isn't very descriptive. Much more helpful would have been something like "mechanical editing all amenity=drinking_water to remove any drinkable=yes tags". | |
| 3 | 2016-09-22 03:56:56 UTC | escada | Was there any reaction on your questions ? Why wasn't this changeset reverted ? | |
| 4 | 2017-04-03 10:07:05 UTC | philippec | Maybe place a note for Polyglot. That is his territory. | |
| 5 | 2017-04-03 10:11:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | @FrViPofm - can you think of a good reason why this should _not_ be reverted? | |
| 6 | 2017-04-03 20:07:17 UTC | FrViPofm | @SomeoneElse - can you think of a good reason why this should be reverted? | |
| 7 | 2017-04-04 21:55:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | @FrViPofm Yes, it looks like a mechanical edit that removes tags added by other mappers. | |
| 8 | 2017-04-05 09:41:35 UTC | philippec | I think that SomeoneElse deserves a good explanation. | |
| 9 | 2017-04-05 20:15:00 UTC | FrViPofm | "looks like" but may not be...----------For one who read the doc (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/drinking_water#Current_situation) they were 3384 drinkable=* at 2014-04-15. This changeset made 318 changes. Les that 10%. A mechanical edit on less than a tenth ?... | |
| 10 | 2017-04-05 20:33:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm sorry but you still haven't explained exactly _what_ you have changed or _why_ you changed it. For example, why did you change http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/942584694/history but not, say, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1261454510 ? Assuming that you haven't visited all of these places... | |
| 11 | 2017-04-05 21:33:31 UTC | FrViPofm | I don't remember, it's more than 2 years ago... But I'm pretty sure I had enough knowledge on those nodes, with the tags themselves, according to the wiki. e.g. amenity=drinking_water implies drinking_water=yes. As junction=roundabout implies oneway=yes.According to Rudolph mentions, they have bee... | |
| 47433128 by Fa7C0N | 1 | 2017-04-05 19:59:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for fixing! |
| 47478230 by mxrev8 | 1 | 2017-04-05 14:42:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,"minor edits / repetition / redundancy / abreviation / duplication / contraction / shortening / cleaning up overbloating / " isn't really much more informative than "minor edits".I really don't understand why you have made https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45547650/hist... |
| 47433613 by mxrev8 | 1 | 2017-04-04 11:51:39 UTC | agnostico | This is not a generic "Ufficio Postale", but a postal agency called "Agenzia Sailpost". It's a private postal service and the name tag should reflect this fact.Please think about it. |
| 2 | 2017-04-04 20:44:07 UTC | dgitto | This is vandalism. Not "minor edits". Because you know that other mappers in the community don't via agree with you | |
| 3 | 2017-04-05 13:37:50 UTC | mxrev8 | OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe th... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-05 14:37:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | @mxrev8 - you seem to be adding your "OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies" text in such a way that makes _you_ look like a bully: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5571621Rather than keeping repeating it, I'd suggest engaging with the rest of the comm... | |
| 5 | 2017-04-05 16:37:48 UTC | mxrev8 | the post office "Ufficio Postale" of Poste Italiane is right in front of Sailpost, which either one of them was not marked. i wonder if Sailpost franchises should use the "Post Office" symbol or rather a shop symbol. of course, since market liberalization of couriers, all courier... | |
| 6 | 2017-04-05 18:08:45 UTC | dgitto | The name is not "ufficio postale" as everyone knows.This edit will be reverted | |
| 47427854 by RVR007 | 1 | 2017-04-04 21:02:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops (again) :) |
| 47439325 by int_us | 1 | 2017-04-04 12:06:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Placenames in OSM should be in the commonly spoken local language. If you want to see names in latin script, try another map (such as the cycle map on this site) |
| 2 | 2017-04-08 09:16:28 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47562672 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some (perhaps just misguided) name changes. Attempts to contact the mapper failed. | |
| 47410408 by int_us | 1 | 2017-04-03 13:32:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.In this changeset and others you've changed some names from mixed language name to a single-language name.Names in OpenStreetMap are usually governed by the "on the ground" rule - see http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInfo... |
| 2 | 2017-04-08 09:16:32 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47562672 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some (perhaps just misguided) name changes. Attempts to contact the mapper failed. | |
| 46725627 by ألبرشت شونكا | 1 | 2017-04-02 13:24:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Here you've changed e.g. the name of "Morocco" to not include French. Did you check that that change was acceptable to the OSM community in Morocco before doing so?OSM generally follows an "on the ground rule" with regard to names - see http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d... |
| 47379990 by codingcat | 1 | 2017-04-02 13:18:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Here you've changed the "name" tag of Morocco from an Arabic/Berber combination (previously it was French/Arabic/Berber) to English.The "name:en" (i.e. the English name) has been "Morocco" all the way through this process.This ch... |
| 47344618 by mikesw3b | 1 | 2017-04-01 21:53:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 47344605 by Chuan Zhang | 1 | 2017-04-01 21:52:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 36274850 by Stu Mitch | 1 | 2017-04-01 09:07:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Stu,To my knowledge, none of these roads "have numbers" in any meaningful sense. They were already tagged with an "official_ref" (used by and only useful to the council). There are no signs, so C93 through Flaxton isn't anything that you can "refer" to.Best Reg... |
| 2 | 2017-04-01 09:58:14 UTC | Stu Mitch | Hi Andy, I wondered about this. Occasionally you see these on signs but yes it is only occasional. They are references by local authorities, so if you had to report to a council it could be useful or if you wanted to query council work. Thanks for the comment though. Regards, Stu | |
| 3 | 2017-04-01 10:48:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | There is (or used to be) at least one signed "C" road near Helmsley, but they're pretty rare.It would certainly be possible (and not that difficult) to render "official_ref" on a map, but it doesn't make much sense to do so on a general purpose one. As an example, the "pr... | |
| 47313471 by myloveonmap | 1 | 2017-03-31 12:59:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,With this change you added some toilets called "move point" (which seems an odd name) in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. I've deleted it.Best Regards,Andy |
| 47289343 by Rajesultanpur | 1 | 2017-03-30 13:21:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Rajesultanpur,Are you sure about the bridge location at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/26.74465/82.09145 ? It doesn't seem to match the Bing imagery at that location.Best Regards,Andy |
| 47287213 by Aysel117 | 1 | 2017-03-30 11:28:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Aysel117,Here you've removed some of the language names from http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/232172609/history . Please don't do that. In http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1194 I stressed the sensitivity of names (as I'm sure you well know).If you have evidence that the "na... |
| 2 | 2017-03-30 11:33:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | One more thing - applications such as MAPS.ME will use "language name tags". If you think "name:az" is missing from areas where the Azeri language is used and it differs from the "name" then I suggest that you add "name:az" tags.The last time that this was ... | |
| 47229879 by srividya_c | 1 | 2017-03-28 14:18:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Er - you've just deleted the weather buoy at lat 0, lon 0.Is it definitely no longer there?It has its own web page:http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=13010 |
| 2 | 2017-03-30 09:44:37 UTC | srividya_c | Oh never knew this. Will make sure I keep an eye on this node. Thank you for sharing. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-30 11:05:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | There's actually no recent data from it, but there's actually no recent data from any of the Atlantic stations: http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/obs.shtml so I'm guessing that that's just a glitch. | |
| 47161438 by opengislab | 1 | 2017-03-28 21:27:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello opengislab,This looks like an import of data from a government agency. I don't remember seeing anything in the past year or so on the imports mailing list about Colombia, or on talk-co about importing Divipola data. How imports should be carried out is described at https://wiki.openstreetm... |
| 2 | 2017-03-28 21:29:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hola opengislab,Esto parece una importación de datos de una agencia gubernamental. No recuerdo haber visto nada en el último año o así en la lista de correo "imports" sobre Colombia, o en "talk-co" sobre la importación de datos de Divipola. C&... | |
| 47204321 by manings | 1 | 2017-03-28 21:18:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Maning,Thanks for reverting.No edits by the account that added it since the comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47161448 ; we'll see what happens next. |
| 47198522 by Shamaun | 1 | 2017-03-27 13:53:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Shamaun,Thanks for tidying this up.Best Regards,Andy |
| 47141650 by mimakter | 1 | 2017-03-25 09:07:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello mimakter,Both of the things that you've added in this changeset have been given a name of "house".The "name" tag in OSM is really only for names, not for descriptions. If you want to say that "this is a house" than use a "building" tag of "hous... |
| 47141641 by select | 1 | 2017-03-25 08:20:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello select,Thanks for replying to some of the comments at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3042095 . However, all of your changeset comments seem to be just "trace". This isn't helpful to other mappers. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_cha... |
| 47076142 by Stan W | 1 | 2017-03-23 18:13:44 UTC | will_p | Hi Stan,Last week I commented on a bridleway you added north of Kegworth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46882223). I received no response from you, and at the weekend I decided to survey it on the ground, because your remote mapping was clearly approximate and rather confusing in the w... |
| 2 | 2017-03-23 21:09:49 UTC | Stan W | Hi Will,Apologies for not responding - I am not familiar with the concept of discussions.While I was relying on second-hand information from one of my team of surveyors who walked the route, this does raise an issue in my mind as to the purpose of including routes on OpenStreetMap.If we ... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-24 11:34:40 UTC | will_p | Hi Stan,There has been a lot of discussion in the past about tagging rights of way and the general consensus is that the highway tag should only be used to indicate physical characteristics and not access rules. There are separate tags available for tagging access (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-24 16:00:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Stan, hi Will - for info https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html is on a server in Germany now, and should be able to cope with people viewing maps there (though tile scrapers would be a problem).Best Regards,Andy | |
| 5 | 2017-03-24 16:17:07 UTC | SK53 | Hi Stan,A couple of blog posts about footpath mapping & assessing completeness of PRoW information are: https://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/10-years-of-footpath-mapping-for.html and https://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/looking-for-footpaths-in-hickling-notts.html might help build the ... | |
| 47102286 by Jdawg2018 | 1 | 2017-03-23 21:49:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've accidentally uploaded the "learnosm" test data in the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset :)I'll delete it...Also, it would really help if any changeset comment that you use has meaningful comments in it. Yours only has hashtags in it - there's no description of wh... |
| 47078850 by michaelinredhill | 1 | 2017-03-23 16:29:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | The website that you added suggests that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/715633050/history is shut... |
| 47099558 by Krisstimata | 1 | 2017-03-23 16:21:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've accidentally uploaded the "learnosm" test data in the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset :)I'll delete it...Best Regards,Andy |
| 47058643 by Nad1408 | 1 | 2017-03-22 09:13:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bitte antworten Sie auf die Fragen unter http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4844568 und https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57240 . |
| 47010184 by baba_sigmatiq | 1 | 2017-03-20 14:35:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4744899153/history was uploaded at "latitude 0, longitude 0". I've deleted it.Best Regards,Andy |
| 46499424 by Mihai Turceanu | 1 | 2017-03-18 20:09:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Mihai Turceanu,Can you explain what "wrong hiwghway set" means? Also, it's a bit worrying when a new OpenStreetMap mapper comes along and the only changes they make are deletions. Can you please explain what the problem was?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-03-18 20:10:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | (Traducere automată)Bună ziua Mihai Turceanu,Poți explica ce "hiwghway greșit set" înseamnă? De asemenea, este un pic mai îngrijorătoare atunci când un nou cartograf OpenStreetMap vine de-a lungul și singurele modificări pe care le fac sunt deleții. Puteți s... | |
| 46813231 by paul izrail | 1 | 2017-03-18 14:29:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,In here you've added an industrial area called "forest". This seems unlikely - can you explain?Best Regards,Andy |
| 42614390 by Sawan Shariar | 1 | 2017-03-17 22:58:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Sawan Shariar,There seem to be some unconnected nodes in this changeset such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4429529228Can you explain where they came from?Best Regards,Andy |
| 46922264 by Shamaun | 1 | 2017-03-17 22:49:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Shamaun,Welcome to OpenStreetMap!Unfortunately, almost all of the buildings in this changeset seem to be called "house", which doesn't make a lot of sense.Are you using "geoMapTool" for that? If so, please stop using it immediately - it is broken.Please contact Open... |
| 46939228 by smafroza | 1 | 2017-03-17 22:43:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello smafroza,Welcome to OpenStreetMap!Unfortunately, every building in this changeset seems to have named "house" - which doesn't make a lot of sense.Are you using "geoMapTool" for that? If so, please stop using it immediately - it is broken.Please contact OpenStreetMap... |
| 46938297 by ibrahim2 | 1 | 2017-03-17 21:32:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello ibrahim2,You have called almost every building in this changeset "house", which really doesn't make a lot of sense.Are you using "geoMapTool" for that? If so, please stop using it immediately - it is broken.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-03-17 22:39:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481088527/history overlaps with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454262870/history , which makes no sense.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 42725792 by mimakter | 1 | 2017-03-17 22:31:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello mimakter,Welcome to OpenStreetMap!Unfortunately, something's gone wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481081840 . It's presumably supposed to be a building, but is a straight line in the middle of another one.Are you using "geoMapTool" for that? If so, please stop u... |
| 2 | 2017-03-17 22:35:16 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46943778 where the changeset comment is: Reverting multiply duplicated data added with buggy GeoMapTool app | |
| 46923395 by Shaplakhatun | 1 | 2017-03-17 22:18:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Shaplakhatun,Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Unfortunately something has gone a bit wrong here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481006984/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481006761 look like the same building that has been uploaded twice.Also, I'm sure that every building does n... |
| 2 | 2017-03-17 22:22:20 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46943595 where the changeset comment is: Reverting multiply duplicated data added with buggy GeoMapTool app | |
| 46938613 by shahadat19 | 1 | 2017-03-17 21:39:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello shahadat19,You're adding the same things over and over again - please stop!Are you using "geoMapTool" for that? If so, please stop using it immediately - it is broken.Please contact OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group in data@osmfoundation.org so that we can explain the problem ... |
| 2 | 2017-03-17 22:11:48 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46943272 where the changeset comment is: Reverting multiply duplicated data added with buggy GeoMapTool app | |
| 46939671 by Sabina ul | 1 | 2017-03-17 21:31:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Sabina ul,Your newly added building http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481098448/history seems to overlap with http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481098448/history . Can you explain what happened?Also, you have called almost every building in this changeset "house", which really doe... |
| 46927335 by Nad1408 | 1 | 2017-03-17 13:25:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Please stop making these changes without answering the many questions that other mappers have asked you. |
| 2 | 2017-03-17 13:25:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bitte hört auf, diese Änderungen zu machen, ohne die Major Fragen zu beantworten, die andere Mapper dich gefragt haben. | |
| 46918832 by Mihai Mandea | 1 | 2017-03-17 09:19:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What is your source that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286864080/history is no longer proposed but now actually built?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2017-03-17 09:19:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Buna,Care este sursa ta că http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286864080/history nu mai propune, dar acum, de fapt construit?Toate cele bune,Andy Townsend, în numele Grupului de lucru a datelor OSM lui. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-17 10:18:40 UTC | razor74 | That motorway does not exist. For shure. And must not be changed from this state. You do those changes by ear or what? And why you ignore us all? | |
| 46920423 by Mihai Mandea | 1 | 2017-03-17 09:11:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello again,You appear to be making repeated changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311224899/history . Can you please explain your source for this being a trunk road rather than tertiary or secondary?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2017-03-17 09:46:52 UTC | razor74 | Traffic trough Soseaua de centura is only for trucks. Not for normal cars. The general trafic or touristic trafic must go troug Calimanesti. And the quality of the road Soseaua de Centura is very bad. Normal cars must not on that road which is crowded by trucks. So that road must have lover rank, l... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-17 09:52:12 UTC | razor74 | In romanian language - Nu mai schimba te rog Soseaua de centrua de la Calimanesti in primary road. Acea sosea este doar pentru trafic greu. Pe acolo trebuie sa mearga numai tirurile. Tirurile nu au voie prin Calimanesti, altfel primesc amenda. In plus drumul ala e foarte degradat si nu vrei sa stai ... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-17 10:08:22 UTC | cristianbogdan | Like in the motorway cases, this is very confusing for drivers and can result in fines. | |
| 46864149 by Malvolapukulo | 1 | 2017-03-15 11:34:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Looking at http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=46864149 , it would appear that you've made other changes to tags other than just Esperanto. Can you explain here what those changes are?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-03-15 11:34:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Rigardante http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=46864149, ĝi aperus ke vi faris aliajn ŝanĝojn al etikedoj aliaj ol nur Esperanton. Ĉu vi povas ekspliki ĉi kio tiuj ŝanĝoj?Plej amike,andy | |
| 3 | 2017-03-15 12:37:05 UTC | Malvolapukulo | Should I respond in Esperanto or in English?1. Mi ŝanĝis nomojn de landoj al tiuj enhavantaj finaĵon -uj- anstataŭ -i-, ĉar -uj- sistemo estas pli logika, mi movis nomojn kun -i- al alt_name:eo. Mi uzis liston de http://bertilow.com/lanlin/europo.html, kun la jenaj esceptoj: Irlando/Ejro, P... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-16 23:44:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks, but to be pedantic you did announce the "name:simple" changes in your diary in Esperanto! When it comes to making announcements that's right up there with 'in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leop... | |
| 46855721 by AHMED ATAHRAN | 1 | 2017-03-16 22:01:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-03-16 22:25:50 UTC | AHMED ATAHRAN | Hello,Sorry, I did not pay attention to this, it was my first use of OSM,Next time, if i need, i will use test server.Thank you.Ahmed | |
| 3 | 2017-03-16 22:26:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - if you've got any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 46808206 by SCABOVIO | 1 | 2017-03-16 21:57:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 46865190 by Nad1408 | 1 | 2017-03-15 11:20:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bitte antworten Sie auf die Fragen unter http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4844568 |
| 2 | 2017-03-21 17:06:34 UTC | Eberth | This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 47045657. Please read https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57240 and get in touch with the community! | |
| 46842101 by mirriam mweetwa | 1 | 2017-03-14 23:26:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - somehow in this change you managed to add something at latitude 0, longitude 0 - any idea how that might have happened? |
| 46833897 by brianboru | 1 | 2017-03-14 18:30:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Brian,Could you please address the questions raised on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46819034 before continuing to import this data?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-04-17 09:16:10 UTC | brianboru | Being addressed as requested. Import paused | |
| 46814368 by JaviAyuntaIrun | 1 | 2017-03-14 10:38:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Was it your intention to remove the ISO3166-1 for Spain here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-03-14 10:38:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hola,¿Fue su intención retirar la ISO3166-1 para España aquí?Atentamente,Andy | |
| 3 | 2017-03-14 11:14:21 UTC | JaviAyuntaIrun | Hola Andy !! No ha sido un fallo. It was a mistake. sorry ;-) | |
| 46819034 by brianboru | 1 | 2017-03-13 18:16:22 UTC | chillly | This is an import, right? Where's the unique userid? Where's the wiki import page? Where's the Imports mailing list discussion? |
| 2 | 2017-03-13 22:54:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Brian,It looks like things may have got a bit ahead of themselves here. The only list discussion that I can see for this is at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-westmidlands/2017-March/002127.html , and that's not really a discussion as much as you saying "I'd like to imp... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-19 15:15:59 UTC | pigsonthewing | Other issues are already being discussed elsewhere, but "Betula sp" (strictly, with italicised "Betula" and period in "sp.") is the correct taxonomic designation for a specimen of the genus Betula, whose exact species is not known.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speci... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-19 17:17:34 UTC | SK53 | @pigsonthewing: there is also a widely used genus tag, which is particularly appropriate for trees not identified to species (and generally useful because of the vagaries of the taxonomy of various street trees). | |
| 46825444 by MissAngie12 | 1 | 2017-03-13 22:20:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!What are you actually trying to do here?You might find something like http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ more appropriate for whatever it is.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-03-13 22:23:33 UTC | chillly | This follows a pattern. Whoever is coordinating this would be best to talk to someone in OSM (by adding a comment here or sending a direct message to me). These edits are likely to be deleted, they are not useful in OSM, so this work will be lost. | |
| 46825021 by RogerDunn45 | 1 | 2017-03-13 22:02:13 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMThis is the second edit this evening adding a very strange plateau in this locality. Is this part of a course or a some other related group?This really does not look valid for the area. I think both edits are likely to be removed. |
| 2 | 2017-03-13 22:06:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Unlike the other one, there probably is a bit of moraine under here (it's a raised bit west of the Rother and the clue's in the nae "Stonegravels") but ir's doesn't really belong in OSM as it stands.What are you actually trying to do?You might find something like http://umap.openstreet... | |
| 46824124 by Permafrozen | 1 | 2017-03-13 21:18:18 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMWhat is this edit all about? Did you realise that you were saving to the live database? You seem to have a very odd group of tags and names for an urban part of UK.Do you need some help with this edit? I can remove it for you if that is what is needed. |
| 2 | 2017-03-13 21:56:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's not much of a plateau certainly - St Augustine's Road is very much a hill with the river at the eastern end of it, and the road that drops down to Queen's Park is likewise.What exactly is it supposed to be? | |
| 46780026 by Baldric | 1 | 2017-03-13 14:14:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4407506448/history still a bike shop? It's marked as shop=bicycle (although the name has been removed).Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-03-13 19:42:34 UTC | Baldric | Definitely not a bike shop anymore but still a retail unit. CheersPaul | |
| 46762821 by David Josh | 1 | 2017-03-13 13:52:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I'm not sure how it happened, but you've added some things in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.Please don't do this, even as a test - OpenStreetMap is a map of things that really exist in the world, not test data.Hope you don't mind me mentioning this, just t... |
| 46795156 by smaprs_import | 1 | 2017-03-12 22:00:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Relation 7066589 has 37,948 nodes as members. It's just broken an osm2pgsql import here, and I suspect I wont be the only one.What is it actually supposed to be? |
| 2 | 2017-03-12 22:18:07 UTC | woodpeck | I have also noticed that this import seems to have first been raised on talk-br on March 9, two days before the import was started. Problems like a collection relation with 37k members would have been found before the import if people had actually had time to look at what was proposed. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-12 22:21:56 UTC | woodpeck | The survey points seem to contain this message: "Não alterar: coordenadas originais do IBGE". I wonder why they are imported in OSM at all; what use is data that you cannot alter in OSM? Anyone interested in doing anything with the survey points can just use the shape file. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-12 22:24:37 UTC | pnorman | Hello,Imports in OSM are subject to some requirements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines), one of which the community is consulted prior to the import, including the imports@ mailing list.Because this import is causing technical problems and has not been discussed, I'm go... | |
| 5 | 2017-03-12 22:29:36 UTC | smaprs | Ok, if you think its' better to revert it. We discussed it in Brazilian community thinking these survey points have precise coordinates and can help align imagery in remote regions of Brazil. I'll read carefully your remarks and see what can be done better. | |
| 6 | 2017-03-12 22:39:38 UTC | woodpeck | I have looked that the Bing imagery surrounding some of the points and found nothing visible on the ground that I could have used to align the image though. I think the matter deserves a more thorough discussion. We'll revert it for now but that doesn't mean it can never come back. | |
| 7 | 2017-03-12 22:51:03 UTC | smaprs | Ok. Sorry for the unexpected problems. | |
| 42674223 by tasauf1980 | 1 | 2016-10-09 16:54:50 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this area again? Looks like several of the islands got flooded:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445857480#map=14/24.5132/89.7487The reason seems to be this relation, where the roles of the members do not match:http://osm.org/relation/6628885Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2017-03-11 21:57:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also,Tagging http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445462657 as a "village green" is surely wrong.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 46201620 by dehr | 1 | 2017-02-24 12:30:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 2 | 2017-03-10 22:01:24 UTC | dehr | Dear Andy (DWG),Thank-you for your message. Yes, I work for Facebook and my name is David. Per your requests on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:AI-Based_Country_Scale_Road_Import and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57387 we have stopped making any edits. Please ... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-10 22:26:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi David.Thanks for the clarification.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 45986910 by dehr | 1 | 2017-02-11 09:39:42 UTC | pitscheplatsch | Hi dehr. May I know the reason behind deleting many mapped highways in this changeset? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45986910 |
| 2 | 2017-03-08 00:13:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Pascal,This changeset is I think related to https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=632747#p632747 . Essentially Facebook created some "clever" workflow to add roads (like they did last year that resulted in every wadi and wall in Egypt bing added as a "road" befo... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-10 21:22:57 UTC | stephankn | @Andi: It's quite difficult to properly use changeset discussions as long as there is no way to find your own comments. There is code fragments to add this to the wiki page but no one works on it. Thailand has a forum where more people participate in discussions. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-10 21:58:57 UTC | dehr | Hi Pascal, Andi, and Stephan.Sorry for the late response on this changeset as this is my personal account and does not see much usage. I work for Facebook and my name is David. We were working in the dev environment and an editor accidentally uploaded their practice edits to live OSM inste... | |
| 5 | 2017-03-10 22:25:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | @stephankn - it is possible to find your own comments (thanks to Pascal!):http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=61891&commentedCheers,Andy | |
| 46714069 by Elfangorax | 1 | 2017-03-09 17:08:02 UTC | GinaroZ | Hi, welcome to OSM. Just wondering why you have changed these from gardens to parks? |
| 2 | 2017-03-09 17:41:21 UTC | Elfangorax | These two locations -- particularly Gardner's Crescent -- could equally be considered gardens and parks. I changed them to parks because I believe Pokémon Go uses named parks to assign nests in the game. I'm not sure whether it's possible to classify them as both, but would be happy to do so ... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-09 23:02:22 UTC | GinaroZ | They can only be tagged as one or the other. Parks are usually larger, and "Exchange Park" was tagged as a private garden - so hardly a park!Finally, you should not be changing OSM data just so it creates nests in Pokemon Go. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-10 11:54:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | I was there only the other week, and what is now called "Exchange Park" didn't look anything like a park to me :( | |
| 5 | 2017-03-10 22:57:34 UTC | GinaroZ | I've reverted these back to gardens | |
| 46666195 by Luke Langholf | 1 | 2017-03-08 11:11:14 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46677521 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (ficitional additions at (0,0)). All other edits of the changeset are not worth enough to be kept. |
| 2 | 2017-03-08 21:46:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Nakaner - Just in case you're not aware, "Cat Forest", "Happy Park" etc. are part of the learnosm test data. See https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm/issues/335 for the full story. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-08 21:56:45 UTC | Nakaner | Hi SomeoneElse,thank you for the hint. I found it because Martijn van Exel tweeted a screen shot and I could not – as you might expect – wait and reverted immediately.Best regardsMichael | |
| 4 | 2017-03-23 22:48:00 UTC | althio | Hi Luke Langholf,Thank you for trying out OpenStreetMap with JOSM and LearnOSM.Most of all sorry about the complications with your very first edit. Unfortunately a glitch introduced bogus data from the sample file, so your contribution was promptly deleted. Now some of your modifications sho... | |
| 46685591 by gormur | 1 | 2017-03-08 17:22:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hehe - and congratulations for allowing for the offset!https://news.virginia.edu/content/researchers-explain-why-greenwich-prime-meridian-moved |
| 46297946 by Bgabor | 1 | 2017-02-23 09:46:38 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this changeset generated a lot of objects with a huge number of tags that are not documented and seem to have been added by mistake during this import.Jan |
| 2 | 2017-02-23 09:57:41 UTC | Bgabor | Hi, All 4000 points a certain water sources in the area and all attached attribute is important. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-23 10:02:50 UTC | mueschel | If this information is important, I suggest to use common tags that can be parsed by existing software. Btw, I don't see a connection to hotosm project 2525 you mention in the changeset comment. Has this import of data been discussed on the appropriate mailing list? Is this data really 'open'? The... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-26 19:48:11 UTC | edvac | Hi:If this is an import and haven't been discussed, it should be reverted inmediatly.Imports have to be discussed with the local community and with the imports list, and should be documented and the source compatible with the ODbL. | |
| 5 | 2017-02-28 15:03:58 UTC | muralito | No doubt it is an import. It should be reverted, or at least discussed, fixed and the resulting new tags documented. | |
| 6 | 2017-03-03 01:14:37 UTC | edvac | This import has been reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46535966Please, read and follow the imports guidelines (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) before doing any import. Imports have to be documented, been given ODbL compatible permission by the copyright owners... | |
| 7 | 2017-03-07 23:31:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Bgabor,Just to echo what has been said above - if you want to import data please do read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and follow the links from it.If you've got any questions you can either mail the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org or ask on the "imports"... | |
| 8 | 2017-03-08 10:29:54 UTC | Bgabor | Hi,I will send a letter for the National Bureau of Statistics to Tanzania, and ask them to clarify the licenses for all data from http://opendata.go.tz/ website.PS: thank you for your efforts...Gabor | |
| 9 | 2017-03-08 12:05:29 UTC | muralito | Hello Bgabor:If the terms & conditions are the same as stated in http://opendata.go.tz/en/pages/kanuni-na-masharti , I'm not sure if the d) paragraph is compatible with ODbL. Maybe in this case we need explicit permission from the owner to import their data into OSM. | |
| 10 | 2017-03-08 12:39:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Bgabor,I'd suggest having this discussion on the "imports" list - there people will be able to advise you about licenses.See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-February/004819.html for where this import was first mentioned there.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 45987021 by dehr | 1 | 2017-02-11 09:39:20 UTC | pitscheplatsch | Hi dehr. May I know the reason behind deleting many mapped highways in this changeset? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45987021 |
| 2 | 2017-03-08 00:13:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | See my comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45986910 - part of the same process I think. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-10 22:00:05 UTC | dehr | Hi Pascal and Andi.Sorry for the late response on this changeset as this is my personal account and does not see much usage. I work for Facebook and my name is David. We were working in the dev environment and an editor accidentally uploaded their practice edits to live OSM instead of the de... | |
| 46481155 by Oak_Park_IL | 1 | 2017-03-08 00:01:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Oak_Park_IL,Somethings gone a bit wrong here. It looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477786620 was imported and you did't check for existing data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327700188 (those two buildings overlap).As I said on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset... |
| 46663387 by Bgabor | 1 | 2017-03-07 23:38:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Any idea what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479158273 is here? It doesn't have any tags on it.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-03-08 10:04:47 UTC | Bgabor | Hi, Yes, the task wasn't finished yet. Now it has tag on it... | |
| 40258715 by carlitos gomez | 1 | 2017-02-26 08:11:45 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Hi carlitos gomez, this changeset looks like an import (14782x man_made=water_well). Where was this import discussed and documented? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines)The problem i see is the possible incorrect tagging: you used name instead of ref, and tagged both amenity=wat... |
| 2 | 2017-02-26 19:42:55 UTC | edvac | This import has been reported to the imports list. It will likely be reverted, or redacted in case there is a copyright infringement. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-03 01:10:14 UTC | edvac | This changeset has been reverted, in two changesets:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46536080https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46536388Please, follow the imports guidelines (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) for any import. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-03 14:02:31 UTC | carlitos gomez | Hi HaraldSurely this is an error on my part. I didn't realize because the pointswere well displayed on OSMThis data have been shared by CDIG (Centre de Documentation etd'Information Geographique du Tchad) in early 2016.In theory these public data and shareable on OSM (I'm in the process... | |
| 5 | 2017-03-03 14:05:05 UTC | carlitos gomez | Hi EdvacSorry for my late reply, I was on field missionThis data have been shared by CDIG (Centre de Documentation et d'Information Géographique du Tchad) in early 2016. In theory these data is public (I'm in the process of requesting confirmation from my contacts in Chad) | |
| 6 | 2017-03-03 14:18:37 UTC | Harald Hartmann | The problem is, that public data isn't public data. In Germany we have also public OpenData, but: The "attribution" obliges the data user to name the respective data provider. This doesn't match the OpenStreetMap License Policy, and therefore this (OpenData) isn't useable in OpenStreetMap ... | |
| 7 | 2017-03-03 16:01:43 UTC | Marion Barry | But if he gets confirmation from the data provider then it will be fine, correct? | |
| 8 | 2017-03-03 16:08:18 UTC | Harald Hartmann | If he pays attention to the import guidelines,and documents it in the wiki (for transparacy, legal and license issues),and corrects the import,and so on, yes, then everything will be fine. | |
| 9 | 2017-03-03 16:09:09 UTC | Harald Hartmann | sorry, i've forgotten the link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Step_3_-_License_approval | |
| 10 | 2017-03-03 20:04:42 UTC | edvac | Imports have to be discussed with the local OSM community too, and then with the imports list.I would also discourage automatic imports. Better do it manually, crowdsourced, adding contextual data to each object (having a WASH point in the middle of nowhere, without the road access to it, is a rea... | |
| 11 | 2017-03-06 15:20:52 UTC | carlitos gomez | Hi allAll data from the ResEau project (SIRE) under the DDC-Tchad-UNOSAT contractare public and shareable data, confirmed ! | |
| 12 | 2017-03-06 15:41:33 UTC | carlitos gomez | Hi edvacAdd data manually: ok for digitization some infrastructures but I do not think that is a good idea if there are 500, 1000 or 2000 points to add.Freaky, some members of the OSM community met for me (mostly humanitarian staff) just encourages the opposite."having a WASH point in th... | |
| 13 | 2017-03-07 23:35:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello carlitos gomez,Just to echo what has been said above - if you want to import data please do read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and follow the links from it.If you've got any questions you can either mail the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org or ask on the "impo... | |
| 46589890 by Mihai Mandea | 1 | 2017-03-07 22:55:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Mihai Mandea,Could you explain a little bit what "Thanks for Watching" means? Changeset comments are supposed to explain the changes that you made to other mappers, but I can't really understand what "Thanks for Watching" means. Hope you don't mind me asking,Best Reg... |
| 2 | 2017-03-07 22:56:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | (Traducere automată)Bună ziua, Michael Mandea,Ați putea explica un pic ce "Multumesc pentru echipa" Mijloace? Changeset comentarii ar trebui sa explice modificările aduse altor cartografi asta, dar eu nu pot să înțeleg cu adevărat ce "Mulțumesc pentru echipa" Mi... | |
| 46621971 by amankumar | 1 | 2017-03-07 14:05:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-03-07 14:11:06 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data | |
| 46540499 by Villa79 | 1 | 2017-03-07 14:02:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - surprised I missed the SubWay here! |
| 46648922 by Steeley | 1 | 2017-03-07 11:52:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | wideth=3 (which the previous mapper set) might be in feet rather than meters I think - probably still needs a proper survey for access. |
| 45776985 by Bonnie Olson | 1 | 2017-02-25 21:57:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Er - Pokemon Acres, really?That just looks like someone's house to me ...Best Regards, Andy |
| 2 | 2017-03-06 09:08:59 UTC | muzirian | Looks like people are wrongly marking places so that they could have biomes and thus required pokemon at their home. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-06 09:40:53 UTC | muzirian | changeset 45750994 and one more edit in that are looks suspicious | |
| 4 | 2017-03-06 12:34:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | @muzirian Thanks - I've reverted it. | |
| 46564594 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-03-04 09:16:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | This reverts some further edits which depended on Google-derived data reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46564425 . |
| 46452919 by GAV010276 | 1 | 2017-03-02 09:07:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've changed the northern bit of Maun Valley Park https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302973671/history from being a nature reserve into being a duplicate park. It's already a park because it''s part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4031972 - you can tell that by looking at the htt... |
| 46500034 by uffuf | 1 | 2017-03-01 19:08:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I think something has gone a bit wrong here - you've deleted some things that form part of boundary relations, so some (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4761171 ) now have gaps in them.I'll change this back, since presumably this wasn't what you w... |
| 46484184 by Oak_Park_IL | 1 | 2017-03-01 13:05:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Oak_Park_IL,It looks like you're adding a series of nodes here, and it looks like the overlap with existing buildings.What are you actually trying to do?If you're trying to import some data, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik... |
| 46418787 by snipemuck | 1 | 2017-02-26 16:14:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, The names on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477299558/history seem unlikely. If it's called "Waldecker Bank" and it's in Germany I'd be surprised if it has an English names of "Bank (ATM)" or a French name of "banque".Best Regards,Andy |
| 46417790 by ptal_io | 1 | 2017-02-26 16:04:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,It looks like you may be performing some sort of import. Please review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and the links from there including https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines . It's important to discuss imports before they take place to prevent problems such as ... |
| 45207584 by izmickobe | 1 | 2017-01-16 06:43:57 UTC | Chetan_Gowda | In this changeset also, you've deleted a existing road. It can be clearly seen from the BING imagery. |
| 2 | 2017-02-25 21:37:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Chetan_Gowda does this need restoring? | |
| 3 | 2017-02-27 14:16:23 UTC | Chetan_Gowda | Hi SomeoneElse, yes! Need restoring | |
| 4 | 2017-04-03 07:06:17 UTC | izmickobe | Sorry, if I happen to do something wrong.Can you please restore it if possible?Because I don't remember what I did. | |
| 46391955 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-02-25 12:37:33 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 43476437, 43477049, 44946646. |
| 2 | 2017-02-25 13:52:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Edits that depended on this data were reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46392158 . http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46392950 and the next two changesets are patching up some gaps in NY9A (actually present before these changes) and I've asked someone who edited the M12 bus rou... | |
| 46392158 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-02-25 13:49:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | This is tidying up some data that depending on Google-derived data reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46391955 . |
| 26162197 by Xoan Manuel | 1 | 2017-02-25 13:45:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I wonder if you could help - the M12 bus route http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4117524 currently has a gap down at the south end http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4117524#map=17/40.73818/-74.00350 .I'm guessing that you're familiar to the area - could you fill in any gap?Would it ... |
| 46149028 by VLD001 | 1 | 2017-02-25 10:41:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you may be aware there were a number of issues with this changeset. Following problems noted at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=633701#p633701 it was reverted by what is presumably another Facebook account.What software did you actually use to make these edits? The c... |
| 2 | 2017-02-28 01:27:45 UTC | VLD001 | Dear Andy (DWG),Thanks for the clarification. Yes we are aware of the issue and have fixed the bug and edits as we mentioned in this post https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57387.We are using both JOSM and an internal iD editor based on V1.8.5 for validation. As described in ou... | |
| 46116680 by VLD007 | 1 | 2017-02-25 10:40:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you may be aware there were a number of issues with this changeset. Following problems noted at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=633701#p633701 it was reverted by what is presumably another Facebook account.What software did you actually use to make these edits? The c... |
| 46117371 by VLD003 | 1 | 2017-02-25 10:36:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you may be aware there were a number of issues with this changeset. Following problems noted at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=633701#p633701 it was reverted by what is presumably another Facebook account.What software did you actually use to make these edits? The c... |
| 46112721 by VLD002 | 1 | 2017-02-25 10:35:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you may be aware there were a number of issues with this changeset. Following problems noted at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=633701#p633701 it was reverted by what is presumably another Facebook account.What software did you actually use to make these edits? The c... |
| 46144791 by VLD004 | 1 | 2017-02-25 10:33:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you may be aware there were a number of issues with this changeset. Following problems noted at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=633701#p633701 it was reverted by what is presumably another Facebook account.What software did you actually use to make these edits? The c... |
| 44482889 by motaz hendeyh | 1 | 2017-02-24 22:29:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4559402489 is a caravan site in a building. This seems unlikely. Can you explain?Best Regards,Andy |
| 46081403 by brianboru | 1 | 2017-02-24 14:04:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Is the WMCA really "admin level 6"? I thought that it just an attempt to obtain some "City Region" government money, and didn't have any of the administrative powers (beyond running the buses) that e.g. Birmingham City Council did? |
| 2 | 2017-04-17 09:15:14 UTC | brianboru | I did muse over this one. There is an elected mayor and powers over economic regeneration. From WMCA's website:Combined authorities are legal bodies with powers of decision making granted by parliament. They are a new way for local authorities to work together on key strategic functions that cro... | |
| 45982079 by mslie | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:42:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 45987173 by federali | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:40:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46151358 by RVR007 | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:35:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46150953 by RVR005 | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:33:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46182213 by RVR004 | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:32:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46151109 by RVR001 | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:25:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46145312 by VLD007 | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:22:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46122388 by VLD006 | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:21:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46152538 by VLD005 | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:21:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46151291 by VLD003 | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:19:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46152253 by VLD002 | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:19:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46181723 by RVR006 | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:17:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46144939 by RVR003 | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:17:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46144803 by VLD001 | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:17:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 2 | 2017-02-28 01:29:12 UTC | VLD001 | Dear Andy (DWG),Thank you for your message. Yes, I work for Facebook. My name is . Per your requests on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:AI-Based_Country_Scale_Road_Import and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57387 we have stopped making any edits. My profile has ... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-28 01:33:14 UTC | VLD001 | Dear Andy (DWG),Thank you for your message. Yes, I work for Facebook. My name is Jaclyn.Per your requests on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:AI-Based_Country_Scale_Road_Import and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57387 we have stopped making any edits.My profile has b... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-28 16:24:18 UTC | stephankn | a highway=track indicates a way used for agricultural purposes. How do you distinguish these from simply unpaved roads? Do you consider it itelligent to place roads in the middle of nowhere without proper connection to the highway network? Please stop doing such low-quality edits! | |
| 5 | 2017-03-01 00:38:04 UTC | VLD001 | Stephan,Thank you for your feedback. We based our tagging on a few things;1. The commonly used tags in this area are highway=track. For Example https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?edit … 68/99.49212. This area looks like an agricultural area based on our recent high-resolution satellite... | |
| 46361667 by Marcello seme | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:09:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,It would really help other mappers if you could use meaningful changeset comments, not just "#".Best Regards,Andy |
| 46349993 by Sandro Shackleton | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:08:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What is "#yourinstancename-project-2571"? It would really help other mappers if you could use meaningful changeset comments, not just hashtags.Best Regards,Andy |
| 46343701 by FransGW | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:06:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hallo,Wat is "#yourinstancename-project-2572"? Het zou echt helpen andere kaartenmakers als je gewend zinvolle changeset reacties, niet alleen hashtags.mvg,Andy |
| 46145001 by VLD004 | 1 | 2017-02-24 12:28:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46201621 by RVR002 | 1 | 2017-02-24 12:27:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| 46250293 by flohoff | 1 | 2017-02-23 15:47:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | These do look just like doodles, don't they? For info, I've commented over on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Extremmapping about it.Has everything by this user already been checked and if necessary reverted? If not let me know and I'll have a look at what's left (and revert if necessar... |
| 43728113 by Afeef Chaudhary | 1 | 2017-02-23 15:28:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Afeef Chaudhary,Can you explain what you were trying to do here? The "building" that you added just seems to be a big triangle and doesn't seem to match anything on the ground.OpenStreetMap is a map of the world as it exists, not a map of doodles that someone drew because they w... |
| 46324788 by Eng Visal | 1 | 2017-02-23 09:24:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Eng Visal,You've again added two "viewpoints" to OSM, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4700389689 looks very much like a personal bookmark.When you edit OpenStreetMap you're editing a map that everyone can see, not just your personal copy. Please do continue editing, but ... |
| 2 | 2017-02-23 09:26:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | ជំរាបសួរអេងវិសាលអ្នកបានបន្ថែមម្តងទៀត "ទស្សនៈ" ពីរទៅ OSM ទេប៉ុន្តែ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4700389689 មើលទៅខ្លាំងណាស់ដូចជាក... | |
| 46304759 by Werner_Vitus | 1 | 2017-02-22 21:54:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Edits that you make update the one shared map that everyone sees. That's why it's important that only valid edits are made to the map. If you want to experiment with the editors, you can do so over at http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org (an exact copy of the main s... |
| 37672129 by will_p | 1 | 2017-02-18 12:28:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Will,A question about the Y1 bus:Is the Langley Mill / Eastwood stretch of this https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4578631#map=14/53.0159/-1.3311 the same as the Derby / Heanor service? I've only ever used the latter part. the H1 (which this is a partial duplicate of - Yourbus have desi... |
| 2 | 2017-02-19 16:07:57 UTC | will_p | Hi Andy,When I added the Y1 route information I certainly assumed the Langley Mill / Eastwood stretch was part of the same route as the Derby / Heanor section. It was surveyed by photographing the bus stops rather than using the bus.I mostly added the Eastwood part of the route in 2015 and H... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-20 17:07:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks Will,I'll stick the Derby-Heanor bit into the same relation for now and update it if anything seems different.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 36042542 by CyclingClaire | 1 | 2017-02-19 11:09:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello CyclingClaire,I noticed that the whole of a section of the River Worfe http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31176973 had had "ford=yes" added to it. I guess this happened by accident, and I've removed it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46212083 . Everything else is unchange... |
| 45974439 by LLAQWA | 1 | 2017-02-10 20:35:25 UTC | streckenkundler | Hi,the species Humulus lupulus L. is not a tree or shrub. You're making a big mistake here. Fields with hop are only simple perennial farmlands. You must stop your action. The DWG ist informed.See also the germany-Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57322Sven |
| 2 | 2017-02-18 00:15:25 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46178656 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some partially Google-sourced edits | |
| 3 | 2017-02-19 05:31:58 UTC | LLAQWA | hi, i think hop its not a tree too - its a plant. for me hop its a permanent cultivation - not a annual cultivation like mais or rice.because of this y made the changes. | |
| 4 | 2017-02-19 10:23:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | @LLAQWA If you think that there is a category error in the way that things are tagged please do follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct and discuss your changes first - that way we'll avoid wasting everyone's time (yours as well as everyone else's).Best Regards,\... | |
| 46202925 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-02-19 01:15:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Changeset comment here should have been "Reverting some more things in erroneous revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46189471 - see there for more details." |
| 46191505 by giggls | 1 | 2017-02-18 13:51:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - does the ISO code that you've added here apply to:o The territory held by the Polisario Fronto The former state of Western SaharaAs you may be aware, there is more than one claim over the latter.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-02-18 14:23:46 UTC | giggls | We just tried to fix tagging to make nominatim work everywhere. We know, that the current ISO codes (for former state of Western Sahara) are not 100% correct but they are as good as they can get. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-18 14:36:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | If this ISO code doesn't belong to this area, please don't add it. The original area of Western Sahara is in OSM as http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2559126 .I have no idea what you mean by "fix tagging to make nominatim work everywhere". Can you explain? | |
| 4 | 2017-02-18 18:25:06 UTC | giggls | We just changed the behaviour in nominatim to incorporate boundary=disputed. This way we will not need these (arguably) wrong tags here anymore. Feel free to revert my changeset. | |
| 46178656 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-02-18 00:15:28 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 45914144, 45914294, 45914333, 45914358, 45914500, 45914565, 45914981, 45915104, 45915253, 45915299, 45915473, 45915577, 45915797, 45915920, 45916255, 45916443, 45917867, 45918292, 45944402, 45944711, 45944898, 45945626, 45945773, 45945911, ... |
| 2 | 2017-02-18 00:30:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | The changeset comment above is incorrect - this is unrelated to Google. It is instead a revert of a number of plant-based mechanical edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45974439 and other changesets by author of that for details of the problems with the edits that led to them bein... | |
| 46161968 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-02-17 11:38:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've left the duplicate areas (part of two schools) which might be correct and the duplicate nodes (to indicate where there is still a problem). |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 11:40:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Note that some of the "odd duplications" seem to match imagery features, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449580309 , which looks like some sort of shed. The surrounding landuse could also do to be aligned with the school boundary too. | |
| 46134827 by John Grubb | 1 | 2017-02-16 12:33:01 UTC | wille | Hello John Grubb,Thanks for your contributions! However we are not allowed to insert data in OSM from Google Earth/Maps/StreetView. The google license doesn't allow it, please use only the mapbox and bing imagery and your local knowledge.best regards,wille |
| 2 | 2017-02-16 14:12:19 UTC | John Grubb | Cheers, chap...For clarification; data isn't extracted from GE or StreetView; I just use them as a pictorial reference along with my dashcam footage and GPS fixes. I'm not actually aware of what data there is to extract from GE or SV - it's just photos, after all! Unfortunately, the source field... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-16 14:53:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi John,Unfortunately you can't use Google Earth or StreetView even just "as a pictorial reference".Best Regards,Andy Townsend, OSM Data Working Group. | |
| 4 | 2017-02-16 15:20:02 UTC | John Grubb | Blimey! So, for example: browse through StreetView, see a business name has changed since it was mapped, close the browser entirely, at a later time open JOSM, change the name associated with the building and it's a © violation? Who knew...?! Apart from the obvious, who could tell either...?\... | |
| 5 | 2017-02-17 11:01:20 UTC | pnorman | Just don't use Google at all, be it for "a pictorial reference", a "reminder" or anything else related to OSM mapping. It doesn't give you anything you're allowed to use.Unfortunately, I'm going to have to identify what changesets used Google and undo them.Paul NormanFo... | |
| 6 | 2017-02-17 11:59:37 UTC | John Grubb | That's a bind. Oh, well - c'est la vie, I s'pose.It does raise an interesting question, though - when can something seen be unseen. To get away from the GE issue to avoid blurring: I'm an avid hiker and go off with my map and compass into the wilds to bash some hills regularly. If I were to, say... | |
| 7 | 2017-02-19 16:57:13 UTC | SK53 | Straightforward actually: if in doubt don't do it. For hill elevations there are old out-of-copyright OS maps (and possibly some OS Open Data) or elevation from a GPS with a barometer etc. For business names there may be open data such as Food Hygiene, Companies House etc. The actual problem is ... | |
| 46065488 by pokemon go542735387 | 1 | 2017-02-14 00:16:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I've changed the school building back to a school. Please don't change things in OSM to things that they aren't!Best Regards,Andy |
| 45836919 by DrDimedrol | 1 | 2017-02-13 20:44:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Andy from the DWG here. I'm just trying to understand some changes in this area, and noticed that here you've removed the wikipedia / wikidata link for this village and also the "name:az". Was there a reason for that?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working... |
| 45652310 by malcolmh | 1 | 2017-02-12 21:45:17 UTC | chippy | You just deleted Node 1 |
| 2 | 2017-02-12 21:45:44 UTC | chippy | again | |
| 3 | 2017-02-12 21:46:48 UTC | chippy | Sorry, I mean, it had been deleted and restored previously :) | |
| 4 | 2017-02-12 21:58:44 UTC | malcolmh | You had created a duplicate of node 3815077900, which has been there since 2015. | |
| 5 | 2017-02-12 22:12:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | @chippy I don't think malcolmh created the duplicate - that was someone else trying to move an "important" node "somewhere important". "node 1" has been on a few co | |