| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44938340 by u003f | 1 | 2018-08-08 16:14:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What actually is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463968007/history ?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-08-15 11:27:47 UTC | u003f | Hm. Can't remember why I created this. As such, it should be deleted. It's a former road, and current adopted highway. Is there any way to mark up "adopted highways"? Though that would be better marked on its constituent parts. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-15 13:06:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'd probably add the designation tag (whichever one would be appropriate) to the individual ways. There are a few "adopted" ones at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/designation#values ; maybe one of those would work. I maintain a map style that tries to do something with designa... | |
| 61658561 by Halloween123 | 1 | 2018-08-14 17:41:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You're still using "source=knowledge" for these. What does that actually mean?Best Regards,Andy |
| 61656518 by Halloween123 | 1 | 2018-08-14 12:30:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please try and use meaningful changeset comments? "Added road" doesn't really tell anyone anything. Also "source=knowledge" does not explain what source you actually used to add these features in these changesets.Best Regards,Andy Townsend,On behalf of OSM... |
| 29493673 by SK53 | 1 | 2018-08-08 15:43:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any thoughts on what the designation of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59244299/history should be really? There are a couple of "designation=yes" around here... |
| 2 | 2018-08-08 16:03:23 UTC | SK53 | Ones where I could see the green sign from the car, but couldn't read the lettering IIRC. One might be able to make a guess from old maps (bridleways usually shown as a double dotted line), or just possibly geograph images (although this one shows pretty much the view I had from the car http://www.g... | |
| 9556908 by Alex McKee | 1 | 2018-08-08 14:48:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What does "designation=timber_haulage" mean on the B roads here?Best Regards.Andy |
| 18214501 by ehm1806 | 1 | 2018-08-08 14:43:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,is there any reason why Farmfoods here has "designation=Bridlington" on it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 61437634 by smb1001 | 1 | 2018-08-08 07:38:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Does an admin_level make sense here? Surely these have absolutely no administrative function. |
| 2 | 2018-08-08 08:28:09 UTC | smb1001 | You make a good point, and initially I didn't have one until reading the boundary=historic wiki page. I added the historic counties as they're not really 'historic' but current in a non-administrative sense. Similarly they had administrative function but only historically, so I'm not sure which to g... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-08 11:20:45 UTC | DaveF | Could you please refrain from adding historic data to the OSM. You've previously been asked to remove your previous edits, which belong in OHM. I've started a discussion on Talk-GB https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/021751.html | |
| 61335475 by Red_Ranger | 1 | 2018-08-06 16:02:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Red_Ranger,All of your changeset comments seem to be just "Updated the alignment" which isn't very helpful. Can you try and explain a bit more on what sources were used (just imagery, or was there a survey as well, and if so when?) and what sorts of changes you were making?We (a... |
| 2 | 2018-08-06 16:54:31 UTC | Red_Ranger | Yes, I can explain my edits more in my changeset comments going forward. In UAE, the Kaart team did a ground survey, and I used up-to-date Digital Globe Premium that matched our GPS traces and ground survey imagery. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-06 17:12:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. When was the survey? | |
| 4 | 2018-08-06 17:20:56 UTC | Red_Ranger | It was in February and June of 2017. | |
| 61305210 by Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury | 1 | 2018-08-05 06:15:25 UTC | user_5359 | Hello! you add ten POI with very unusually keys (only a example)address=9.0damage=Yesdamage_date=2.0072009E7damage_percent=0.0damage_por=Fullsl=143.0tyep=PhysicalCan you (or your project) explain the meaning of the tags? Specially * values of address* why not lowercase values d... |
| 2 | 2018-08-06 04:33:39 UTC | aHaSaN | Hello #user_5359,Ms. Nazmun is working at a project in Bangladesh. She is a member of a 10 persons' OSM team who are adding the remote rural community risk and disaster data what will be later used for an interactive portal for future decision making. Many thanks that you have pointed all the tag ... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-06 15:21:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | @aHaSaN - Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury has been contacted a number of times both by other mappers and by the Data Working Group (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8176585 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nazmun%20Nahar%20Chowdhury/blocks ) about adding "garbage tags... | |
| 61102456 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-08-06 11:28:05 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | Your Bike Shed was the name of what is now the Micklegate Social, they just haven't removed all the signs yet |
| 2 | 2018-08-06 14:23:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I've removed it. | |
| 61224801 by rossomat | 1 | 2018-07-31 11:51:56 UTC | maraf24 | Nie rysujemy pojedynczych drzew jako obsarów. Wyłącznie jako punkty. |
| 2 | 2018-07-31 11:52:54 UTC | rossomat | to nie sa pojedyńcze drzewa ale conajmniej kilka sztuk obok siebie | |
| 3 | 2018-07-31 13:28:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello maraf24,Can I make a suggestion? Instead of saying "we don't map X like Y" can you perhaps explain with a little bit more detail why that is the case? You could refer to the wiki, refer to taginfo, etc. Just saying "you're wrong" is unnecessarily confrontational (even... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-31 13:29:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Cześć maraf24,Czy mogę coś zasugerować? Zamiast mówić "nie mapujemy X jak Y", czy możesz wyjaśnić nieco bardziej szczegółowo, dlaczego tak jest? Możesz odwoływać się do wiki, odnieść się do taginfo, itp. Samo powiedzenie "jesteś w błędzie" jest... | |
| 61224994 by rossomat | 1 | 2018-07-31 11:51:29 UTC | maraf24 | Złośliwe kasowanie placu i drzew. |
| 2 | 2018-07-31 11:53:45 UTC | rossomat | I CNOWU KURWA DEBILU JEBANY BAWISZ SIE NAPIERDALAJAC SWOJE WYMYŚLONE WANDALIZMY???? | |
| 3 | 2018-07-31 13:15:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello rossomat. You've been blocked before (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1982) for using inconsiderate language. You're currently blocked for engaging in an edit war. When that block ends, if you engage in foul language or shouting (capital letters) again you will be blocked again,... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-31 13:16:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Witaj rossomat. Zostałeś już zablokowany (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1982) za używanie niestosownego języka.Jesteś obecnie zablokowany za udział w wojnie edycyjnej. Kiedy ten blok się skończy, jeśli znowu zaczniesz używać wulgaryzmów lub krzyków (wielkich l... | |
| 61226907 by rossomat | 1 | 2018-07-31 12:45:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello rossomat,Can you explain what was wrong with the highwya=service that you deleted here? It seems to match the photographs that were posted to the forum at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=699553#p699553 . Has the situation changed since those pictures were taken? Earlier ... |
| 2 | 2018-07-31 12:45:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Witaj rossomat,Czy możesz wyjaśnić, co było nie tak z usługą highwya =, którą tutaj usunąłeś? Wygląda na to, że pasuje do zdjęć opublikowanych na forum na https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=699553#p699553. Czy sytuacja zmieniła się od czasu wykonania zdjęć? ... | |
| 61198728 by Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury | 1 | 2018-07-30 16:12:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury,You're adding data to OSM with meaningless tags again (as mentioned previously at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2024 ). Please don''t do this. You can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org .Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on ... |
| 2 | 2018-07-30 22:09:28 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61209814 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed garbage-tag import (following numerous communication attempts) | |
| 60586626 by Geomapper69 | 1 | 2018-07-29 10:18:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/606208734/history really exists? It looks like an entirely fake feature to me. |
| 2 | 2018-07-29 16:02:36 UTC | Geomapper69 | not sure if it is real, i was just fixing geometry errors | |
| 3 | 2018-07-29 16:19:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately "fixing geometry errors" actually makes it harder to correct errors like this in the future - harder to spot them in the first place (because they won't have been last edited by a problem mapper, and because they won't show up as issues on QA sites) and... | |
| 53620317 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-07-29 15:39:52 UTC | SK53 | Walton Dam a micropub I think, but like Chesterfield Alehouse not tagged as such. |
| 2 | 2018-07-29 16:09:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes - I'm sure I've missed lots of micropub tags! The "Walton Dam Nation" is a shop conversion - large for a micropub, but restricted opening hours, normal beer lines and normal (but small) pub toilets. | |
| 55242250 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-07-29 15:38:05 UTC | SK53 | Far for me to make a decision, but Walton looks rather more like a suburb than a village. I see it was originally mapped as a village by JonS way back when. |
| 2 | 2018-07-29 15:39:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Definitely a suburb | |
| 60462066 by raito | 1 | 2018-07-29 10:12:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello - can I ask you about your changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604774286/history ? It looks, to me, like an entirely fake feature. In your change here did you verify that it actually existed? |
| 2 | 2018-07-29 10:35:13 UTC | raito | Hi! Sorry, I missed that.. I only tried fixing duplicate nodes and self-intersecting ways. You may need to deal with that user Guntur Irawan Subagiyo. I guess you are already on it. Cheers. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-29 10:38:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi raito, thanks for that. I've already reverted everything by Guntur Irawan Subagiyo that hadn't already been changed, and asked the person that complained to the DWG to check what's left (they'd already done a significant amount of tidying-up already).It's a possibility that this user is one of... | |
| 61074192 by raito | 1 | 2018-07-29 10:16:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608515214/history really exists? |
| 2 | 2018-07-29 10:36:03 UTC | raito | Sorry, this one seems fictitious as well. | |
| 60468871 by Geomapper69 | 1 | 2018-07-29 10:12:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello - can I ask you about your changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604774286/history ? It looks, to me, like an entirely fake feature. In your change here did you verify that it actually existed? |
| 61147103 by Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury | 1 | 2018-07-28 17:24:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury,You're adding data to OSM with meaningless tags again (as mentioned previously at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2024 ). Please don''t do this. You can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org .Best Regards,Andy Townsend, o... |
| 56450658 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-04-30 11:19:50 UTC | ACarlotti | Can you provide some evidence of this? The only documents I can find online relating to this suggest that it might become an 'expressway', which is not (initially, at least) the same thing. |
| 2 | 2018-04-30 14:40:15 UTC | Greyseal18 | An expressway is a new type of motorway and the A14(M) will be the first one. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-30 21:06:00 UTC | ACarlotti | I've now read more of the Highways England Strategic Road Network Initial Report, and it seems that I was previously misinterpreting it. According to the report (P58-59), the highest classifications of roads will be "Smart Motorway", "Motorway", "Expressway" and "A... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-28 09:35:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | What actually was the source for this change? Is the licence compatible with OSM? | |
| 5 | 2018-07-28 12:56:25 UTC | Greyseal18 | Highways England Strategic Road Network Initial Report | |
| 60598717 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-22 23:53:48 UTC | c2r | Where's the evidence for Brampton Hut being A1 J13a? There weren't any signs last Thursday indicating this change when I drove through. |
| 2 | 2018-07-28 09:29:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Last time I was there (Easter?) it wasn't signed Brampton Hut on-road either, though it's commonly referred to as that. With all the works nearby that might have changed though. | |
| 60016450 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-23 00:02:15 UTC | c2r | This junction doesn't have a number. We've discussed this on SABRE wiki before. Putting junction numbers on OSM because you have a fantasy that they should be numbered, and then using the "OSM" source to reference the change on SABRE is unacceptable, and I'm sure the admins here will hav... |
| 2 | 2018-07-28 09:23:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | These refs aren't signed; I'll revert. | |
| 56524695 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-23 00:13:46 UTC | c2r | Looks like this user has been plagerising AA Maps here. |
| 2 | 2018-07-23 07:16:04 UTC | Greyseal18 | I email the AA and they said that was correct from Highways England so I can’t argue with them really after saying that | |
| 3 | 2018-07-28 08:52:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just to be clear - you can't use AA maps as a source (even if you've asked them).If you've asked them to release the data under an OSM-compatible licence and they've done so, then that would be a different story. | |
| 60550631 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-22 23:55:25 UTC | c2r | Ah yes, the metropolis of Southend. When was it granted City status? Do tell. |
| 2 | 2018-07-23 07:12:43 UTC | Greyseal18 | Then why is Ely a city then because it is so small and nothing really happens there | |
| 3 | 2018-07-23 23:13:42 UTC | c2r | Because it has a giant cathedral... Southend is a town and unitary authority, but isn't a city. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-28 08:49:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | There's definitely a discussion to be had in the UK about "which are cities and which aren't" (despite what the OSM wiki says, different OSM communities worldwide have different ideas of what a city should be). talk-gb is the best place to discuss this stuff - having everyone set "th... | |
| 60973457 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-23 08:12:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I'm pretty sure that this isn't signed as the A46(M), at least not from the south, and I drive past here pretty regularly. What makes you think that it is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-07-23 08:14:24 UTC | Greyseal18 | Pathetic Motorways and SABRE Wiki shows it as a unsigned motorway and if your going to revert this edit then I’m changing the A14(M) from the A1(M) J14 to the A14 Spur to the A1(M) because that is what it says on the signs | |
| 3 | 2018-07-23 19:20:39 UTC | ndm | If all your edits are based on Pathetic Motorways (All media on this website is © Pathetic Motorways, except where noted that they are copyright of a contributor.Please do not copy without permission.) then I think they will all have to be reverted. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-24 14:17:33 UTC | trigpoint | Adding some local knowledge here, this is not signed as A46(M), mpaaing it as such is misleading and this change should be reverted as soon as possible.Phil | |
| 5 | 2018-07-24 14:19:38 UTC | Greyseal18 | Ok I’ll also rename the A14(M) from the A1(M) to the A14 Spur to the A1(M) (as signposted) | |
| 6 | 2018-07-28 08:44:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks | |
| 60806661 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-24 15:38:41 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi, in this change you seem to have changed a number of ways to have the ref M6 Toll or M6 Toll;M42 and set toll=yes when they are not within the region of charge for their use. I suggest that the name M6 Toll should only be used for ways where it is necessary to pay. M42, as previously set for the ... |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 16:43:30 UTC | trigpoint | I recently surveyed the signs on this section and can confirm that the edit made by Brian was correct and matched my survey of the signs. The correct OSM mapping is always what we see on the ground.Please revert these changes.Cheers Phil | |
| 3 | 2018-07-28 08:33:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes - pretty sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142234723/history isn't toll=yes since it's the southbound link from the M42 isn't it? Also I've always thought of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29180118/history as being part of the M42 (even though it probably has lanes signed as M6 Toll). ... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-28 08:42:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | As discussed above I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61137468 . It's probably worth raising any "interesting questions" about road ref values on talk-gb rather than just changing them as lots of people are familiar with this area. | |
| 60804872 by randomcode | 1 | 2018-07-25 22:10:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello randomcode,I'm not quite sure what's happening here. The changeset comment is "labelled HDB facilities for residents and a park connector" but the changeset only contains deletions? Should some data also be added?Best Regards,Andy |
| 61065367 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:49:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 60333406, 60333495, 60333514, 60333574, 60333595, 60333708, 60333776, 60333802, 60333816. |
| 60333816 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333495 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333406 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333595 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333802 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333574 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333514 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333708 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333776 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 61065346 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 60333406, 60333495, 60333514, 60333574, 60333595, 60333708, 60333776, 60333802, 60333816. |
| 60705711 by stefanct | 1 | 2018-07-17 13:25:22 UTC | willebrord | Could you please explain? The summit cross is definitley there and a cross check in other guides/maps confirmed the name (see e.g. "Wien wandert" guide, Rittberger+Knapp 2015, http://www.freytagberndt.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/9783902999023_Innenansicht_01.pdf , S.14) |
| 2 | 2018-07-17 19:09:59 UTC | stefanct | Hi willebrord,there is a guy (apparently called Peter-Paul) who tried really hard toname the peak in question after himself. He lied on multiple occasions whenquestioned about his source and apparently even installed the cross youlinked in the changeset. There have been quite some discussi... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-18 11:05:44 UTC | willebrord | Ah, I see what I got involved in here. ;)Even though the peak might not have an "official" name I think we already reached the "point of no return": There obviously already is a more or less commonly used name for it; we can find "Peter-Paul-Berg" in printed guides [1... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-18 16:43:42 UTC | freebeer | Hallo willebrord,When researching this issue some years back, every single reference i could find all linked back to osm data.for a legitimate name, i expect to be able to find some mention that is completely independent.that automated weather services and the like have dumped osm with errors,... | |
| 5 | 2018-07-19 09:55:13 UTC | willebrord | I beg to differ. The situation here is completely different: This is _not_ a "fictional" place. The peak exists in real world, can be identified [5, see reference above] as a peak in real world (even without the now installed summit cross) and is even marked so in OSM.The only "prob... | |
| 6 | 2018-07-19 22:00:32 UTC | stefanct | the place exists but the name does not. as explained above *all* references are directly from osm/peterpp which actually shows how important it is to ensure good data quality. [5] for example was a picture uploaded by peterpp to wikimedia commons which got removed from there (because of the peak in ... | |
| 7 | 2018-07-20 14:12:10 UTC | willebrord | No, I do not agree that "this started as a fake"! This peak did not have any name and following the commonly accepted procedure someone successfully gave it a name and spread the name. That's it.The discussion is not about if it is acceptable _how_ "Peter-Paul-Berg" got its nam... | |
| 8 | 2018-07-20 14:31:35 UTC | stefanct | If you think adding a name tag to OSM with some arbitrary value that nobody but the person itself is aware of at the time is "a commonly accepted procedure" to establish a name for a landmark than I seriously doubt that you should edit any collaborative worldwide content at all. Also, ther... | |
| 9 | 2018-07-24 12:57:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Quoting a bunch of sites that all use OSM data is just an example of https://xkcd.com/978/ . If someone can produce a source that _predates_ the name being invented by an OSMer called "Peter-Paul" then it makes sense to have it as a "name" here, if not then it doesn't - the fact... | |
| 60973535 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-23 07:34:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Greyseal18,One thing that would be really helpful to other mappers would be to use better changeset comments rather than something like "Minor Edits" or no comment at all. Some of your changes already have this, and I know it can be a pain (especially from a mobile app) but it rea... |
| 56451463 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-02-17 22:55:01 UTC | GinaroZ | Pretty sure that is a motorway link - and not sure it should be called A92(M) either... https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=A92(M) |
| 2 | 2018-02-18 10:13:51 UTC | Greyseal18 | Well if you go onto view source you can see it’s a current motorway and if you go onto a website called Pathetic Motorways it also uses the A92(M) | |
| 3 | 2018-07-22 21:58:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | As discussed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56451569 the Sabre wiki isn't an appropriate source for OSM. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-22 22:03:46 UTC | Greyseal18 | Yes it is as I use it and all the information is true and if there was false info on the website your account will get banned. Also most of the info is on Transport for Scotland and Highways England.It is the information on OMS that can be false. This is not 1 of them it is true. | |
| 5 | 2018-07-22 22:04:29 UTC | Greyseal18 | Also if you think it’s false then I’m removing the A14(M) from the A1(M) J14 to the A14 Spur | |
| 6 | 2018-07-22 22:56:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Greyseal18 To be clear, just because a source is "likely to be correct" does not mean that we will be able to use it in OpenStreetMap. It has to be licensed appropriately so that it's OK for OSM to use it and also for downstream data consumers to use it as well. This applies to data from... | |
| 7 | 2018-07-23 19:05:45 UTC | GinaroZ | @Greyseal18 - The Sabre page I linked to literally says the A92(M) is a possible number, and the existence of the number is disputed. So probably best to leave the ref= blank!However the other issue is why it was changed to a motorway, as it seems like a motorway_link to me? | |
| 60361102 by jmacker | 1 | 2018-07-08 14:24:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,What actually is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604416603 ? It's never had any tags on it.Best Regards,Andy |
| 60419887 by jmacker | 1 | 2018-07-08 13:07:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | As I said in https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=706263#p706263 different OSM communities across the world have chosen very different approaches to "name" mapping. The Indian OSM community has for a long time chosen to use "English" in the name tag throughout India... |
| 2 | 2018-07-08 13:41:13 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60509406 where the changeset comment is: Reverting mechanical edit of names in India. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62872 for discussion | |
| 52470743 by Yorvik Prestigitator | 1 | 2018-07-05 06:52:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Assuming the pump is supposed to be a vertical one, then yes the handle is still missing.(Answering question asked in another changeset) |
| 59074892 by midwich | 1 | 2018-07-01 13:51:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm pretty sure the footpath doesn't go through https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5626349987 but over the bridge to the south (there was no other access over the stream when I was there just 3 weeks ago). |
| 2 | 2018-07-01 14:28:06 UTC | midwich | Ah, for that bit I went by the Ordnance Survey map, might be off a bit. Can you fix it? If not, I'll take a look when I'm there next and sort it myself, no problem. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-01 15:15:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've added the bridge (which still exists) and the designation based on the sign that used to exist at the west. The designation well to the east is still there, but it is currently impassible.Unfortunately we can't use footpath info from os maps until the copyright has expired, so the link north... | |
| 59882837 by midwich | 1 | 2018-07-01 10:18:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I was just updating the map between Slingsby and Hovingham based on a GPS trace from about 3 weeks ago and noticed a bit of duplication north of Fryton.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/598188076 is a footpath, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168742990 is... |
| 41734155 by Chris Parker | 1 | 2018-06-30 21:08:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that Lendal Cellars has a microbrewery in it? I've never heard that it has, and it'd be a bit unusual for GK if it did.Cheers,Andy |
| 60239535 by ForstEK | 1 | 2018-06-30 13:51:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | The majority of the edits in here (15 pages of ways vs 9) appear to be merely mechanical edits. |
| 2 | 2018-06-30 17:57:59 UTC | freeExec | Считаю, что правка была вполне корректна. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-02 09:02:14 UTC | Zverik | Not exactly: ForstEK indeed has retagged many buildings, removing "building=yes" from storage tanks. | |
| 46304500 by 58zarali | 1 | 2018-05-16 16:03:04 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | What is the meaning of fire_hydrant:brand=Opet? |
| 2 | 2018-05-16 16:04:10 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Also - what was license of data used in this import? | |
| 3 | 2018-05-27 15:30:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello 58zarali,The data that you've imported here has a number of problems. One is that the licence appears not to be compatible with OpenStreetMap (the Yellow Pages' site suggests data from it is "© 2016 - 2018 DataWorks"). Another is that you've added wikipedia and wikidata item... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-27 15:30:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Merhaba 58zarali,Buraya aktardığınız verilerin birtakım sorunları var. Birincisi, lisansın OpenStreetMap ile uyumlu olmadığı görülüyor (Yellow Pages'ın sitesinden veriler "© 2016 - 2018 DataWorks"). Bir diğeri, yanlış olan tek tek ürün sayfalar... | |
| 5 | 2018-05-28 05:09:59 UTC | katpatuka | Opet şirekti için çalıştın mı? Opet benzin istasyonlarının datası ile alaklı bir email varsa o zaman OSM viki'de belgelemek lazım. (Örnek: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Katpatuka/CDC_email_traffic ) | |
| 6 | 2018-05-29 17:32:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | @58zarali Please do answer the questions that other mappers are asking here. If you don't we'll have to revert this (not least because of the very odd keys used).Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSMs's Data Working Group. | |
| 7 | 2018-05-29 19:06:50 UTC | 58zarali | Hi Andy,I am a manager in the Digital Maps and Data Operations department at Yellow Pages Turkey.Turkey Yellow Pages has the right to use the data. As a company we provide branded digital maps service. So we installed Opet gas stations on OpenstreetMap.I agree, "fire_hydrant:brand"... | |
| 8 | 2018-06-05 22:29:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi 58zarali,(apologies for repeating some of what has previously been sent by email)It's probably worth taking a step back and reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and the pages linked from there such as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines . What I'd suggest ... | |
| 9 | 2018-06-16 09:57:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | One other thing to mention - the wikipedia, wikidata and website used in each item here are incorrect. For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4699023957 does _not_ have a wikipedia page (although the brand associated with the station does). This is something else that you can discuss with ... | |
| 10 | 2018-06-22 11:16:11 UTC | 58zarali | Hi Andy,Will the problem be solved by deleting "wikidata tr: Opet" tag from all locations?Example Location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4699023952Best,Yusuf | |
| 11 | 2018-06-22 15:42:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | There's a bit more to it than that, as I said above - I'd actually suggest discussing it on the imports list. | |
| 12 | 2018-06-22 18:31:46 UTC | 58zarali | If you can not make bulk edits, you can delete the entire list. | |
| 13 | 2018-06-30 10:22:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've removed the problematical key values in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60298600 (nodes) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60298840 (ways; there were no relations). The changes were:o Remove fire_hydrant:brando Change wikidata and wikipedia where set to brand:wikidata and... | |
| 14 | 2018-07-02 06:03:42 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | @SomeoneElse - thanks for the cleanup! | |
| 60216923 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-06-27 17:53:33 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | Are there really now three bicycle repair stations in York Railway Station?There is the one you have just added on Platform 1 www.openstreetmap.org/node/5723218370The one I surveyed last year next to all the bicycle parking on the platform no longer used for trainswww.openstreetmap.org/n... |
| 2 | 2018-06-27 19:39:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | I reckon that the one I added was actually yours. It didn't obviously look broken. | |
| 59615379 by doublah | 1 | 2018-06-26 13:51:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Just wondered why you'd added a series of no u-turn restrictions such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8360546 here - on that bit of road there's logically no way you'd try and do a U turn on the junction approach?Hope you don't mind me mentioning this... |
| 58552036 by oslim | 1 | 2018-05-10 18:03:17 UTC | PierZen | Not a valid motive to delete lines because this comes from an import. You should comment changeset and discuss with creators. I did a Overpass query for history. See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yHQLooking at way 212063753, I see that nodes correspond to poles on the Bing Imagery.You should rever... |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 15:58:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,At https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/0.18280/31.70850 you've deleted the power line https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256934918/history . That's actually still visible in the online imagery (a couple of different ones) there, both as a gap in the trees and as a series of pylons such as ... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-22 10:33:58 UTC | oslim | Hi Andy,I've indeed delete one power line, which was still existing. For this I'm sorry.But please understand, that the power grid was confusing due to the pre-existing import.With the same changeset I've massively expanded the new 220 kV grid of Uganda, only based on imagery.Greetin... | |
| 4 | 2018-06-22 15:44:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - the imported data did indeed look a bit rubbish! | |
| 59688019 by SomeoneElse2 | 1 | 2018-06-21 13:25:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Test comment |
| 2 | 2018-06-21 13:28:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Another test comment | |
| 34992820 by GerdP | 1 | 2018-06-20 21:30:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | "highway=gallop" probably isn't best described as "highway=bridleway" (though both are obviously designed for horses). I've tagged the ones near me as "track" (but with some kind of description) as it's the least worst option. It's a bit like trying to decide whether ... |
| 59799902 by Nigel Callaghan | 1 | 2018-06-14 15:31:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Has the English name changed here? When I was a kid it was always referred to in English as "Black Rock Sands", though the signage in Morfa Bychan was just a sign with "Traeth" written above "Beach". |
| 2 | 2018-07-08 19:01:24 UTC | trigpoint | No response so correcting from local knowledge. | |
| 59785000 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2018-06-12 17:58:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just to add a bit more detail about the way this data was tidied up:I've removed stuff that genuinely makes no sense (like "if_yes_whe") but have left e.g. "damage_description" since someone might be able to interpret that down the line. I've also left any new geometries, in c... |
| 55287374 by Steeley | 1 | 2018-06-11 10:52:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Surprised that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5328977855 was still open as a Phones4U in Jan this year - didn't the company fold in 2014? |
| 59712531 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-06-10 14:11:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just to summarise the changes here:o https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596114658 replaces https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7373542 , and it's previous outers form part of the new building way.o https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/297356 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505918020 and ... |
| 57781074 by Joe E | 1 | 2018-06-10 13:32:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Apologies if I've got the wrong changeset here, but this I think is the one that has set platform 9 as the default stop in York. just for info (most recently 2 weeks ago) I've caught it from platform 5a.Cheers,Andy |
| 59699399 by CoastalGenius | 1 | 2018-06-09 23:53:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've made http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=7233208 a "leisure=park" again. Are you sure about this? Other mappers seem quite clear that it isn't.Best Regards,Andy |
| 59345092 by CoastalGenius | 1 | 2018-06-08 08:41:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you don't reply to the questions that people have asked you (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=1193932 ) we're going to have to remove some or all of these changes. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591636288 looks pretty unlikely, for example. |
| 57080161 by Hans Wieser | 1 | 2018-05-31 09:52:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've changed the DE and EN names here from versions of the Ossetian names to versions of the Georgian names. Leaving aside the politics, what's the most spoken language on the ground here? Given the location I'd have expected Ossetian rather than Georgian?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-06-04 20:49:30 UTC | Hans Wieser | What means Ossetian version of German name or Ossetian version of English name? Ossetians are free to call places in Ossetian language but it's a nonsense that other languages also have to call them in Ossetian. DE and EN names show how German or English speakers could call a place not how locals ... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-04 23:32:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Not "Ossetian version of German name" but "German version of Ossetian name" (as opposed to "German version of Georgian name").I'm sure that there's no doubt what the name:ka and name:os versions are, but what is the source of name:de or name:en? If it's just a transl... | |
| 4 | 2018-06-06 09:51:42 UTC | Hans Wieser | So what you say (German version of Ossetian name) is wrong very wrong, if you check old Soviet topographic maps you will see that those names are international. Ossetians renamed everything only after the wars in 90s or in 2008. Main names of the settlements show Ossetian names because they are used... | |
| 58246857 by BogDan_Olegovich | 1 | 2018-04-27 12:18:08 UTC | chachafish | Hello, thank you for contributions. Quite a few of the roads you have added cross paths, but you did not add a connecting node. Can you review your edits and correct them? If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Thank you :) |
| 2 | 2018-05-24 19:12:43 UTC | BogDan_Olegovich | Hello! Thank you for flagging this, we found a bug and these issues are fixed. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-25 21:00:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | What was the bug? | |
| 4 | 2018-06-04 11:00:14 UTC | BogDan_Olegovich | Hello SomeoneElse, by bug I meant it was a mistake from our end, we missed on adding the connection nodes. Apologies for not being clear. I will make sure that this does not happen again. | |
| 5 | 2018-06-04 11:58:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | OK, thanks. | |
| 49758479 by Andy Joiner | 1 | 2018-06-02 13:18:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just wondered - is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4931632599 perhaps the same object as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3782675933 from the year before?If it helps, https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=21&lat=51.5711596&lon=-4.1061103 is a rendering that shows bo... |
| 59417367 by saritha kandhsamy | 1 | 2018-05-31 09:10:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592254750 but it's clear from the imagery that it's not _all_ building. The way to tag schools is "amenity=school" not "building=school".Best Regards,Andy |
| 57076529 by Ludmila Gladkova | 1 | 2018-04-09 23:52:13 UTC | JesseMerriam | This parking no longer exists. It has been dug up and is current a building under construction. I removed it when I ceased to exist. |
| 2 | 2018-05-31 09:01:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Ludmila,Are you going to fix the problem here or do you need someone else's help?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 59132002 by EdSS | 1 | 2018-05-31 08:58:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Does this parking lot actually exist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57076529 suggests not.Best Regards,Andy |
| 59353754 by kthor6060 | 1 | 2018-05-30 21:00:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!In this change you've deleted everything within quite a large area. I'm guessing that this might have been by mistake (it sometimes happens when people are trying to use OSM to create a personal map via "export" and don't realise they're deleting som... |
| 58396491 by geozeisig | 1 | 2018-04-25 06:59:33 UTC | highflyer74 | Moin geozeisig!Was hat Dich denn bewegt, weltweit aerodrome:type=military an die Militärplätze zu taggen? Gleiches gilt für die Segelflugplätze in Deutschland (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58396356). Das Tagging ist meiner Erkenntnis nach nie über den Proposal... |
| 2 | 2018-04-27 05:32:48 UTC | geozeisig | Ich hatte geplant anzuregen das Symbol für aerodrome:type=regional / gliding zu ändern. Dazu muss aber das tagging erst mal einheitlich sein. Denn erst ab einer gewissen Größenordnung fangen die an darüber nachzudenken. Die Änderung ist eher formal, die Eigenschaften... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-27 10:26:33 UTC | highflyer74 | Naja, für Diskussionen über bestimmte Tags gibt es die Tagging Mailingliste und wenn man die nicht kennt, kann man im sehr aktiven deutschen OSM Forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14) nachfragen. Ich glaube, Du unterschätzt die Problematik. Ich finde es ja gut, da... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-27 10:37:15 UTC | highflyer74 | Ich habe im Forum mal einen Thread eröffnet (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=696630), zu dem ich Dich gern einladen möchte. Vielleicht kann man gemeinsam eine Lösung finden. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-03 19:18:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | This looks like a bit of an overzealous mechanical edit to me - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1042032811 is presumably https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAF_Ballykelly and closed in 1971.How much checking did you give the rest of the data? | |
| 6 | 2018-05-29 12:24:45 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | I run a check due to request at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:aerodrome:type and I found that geozeisig removed at least 478 aerodrome tags since 2018-01-01.List is at https://gist.github.com/matkoniecz/23bd62764cac4ed81984bb1f8af52dc8 and I am currently running second check that ... | |
| 7 | 2018-05-29 15:03:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555781495 - it was an obvious mechanical edit made without checking (see comment above about RAF Ballykelly)- Andy | |
| 8 | 2018-05-29 15:53:04 UTC | highflyer74 | Hello all!Thanks for taking care of this. Also aerodrome:type=* had been added to hundreds of airports. This tag is far from being consistently defined and should also not be added as a mass edit. This had been reported to DWG and addressed on the forum with little to no concern, so I just let i... | |
| 9 | 2018-05-29 20:36:04 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | And other variant of search - https://gist.github.com/matkoniecz/23bd62764cac4ed81984bb1f8af52dc8#file-better-log - found 514 removals. | |
| 10 | 2018-05-29 20:38:49 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | "This had been reported to DWG and addressed on the forum with little to no concern" - maybe with clear evidence of mass scale it will go better? You can also mention that I volunteer for readding removed aerodrome tags (DWG probably has long queue of people that added copyright-violating ... | |
| 58084352 by Irina Karachevtseva | 1 | 2018-04-15 16:55:53 UTC | chachafish | Hello, when you create a road that crosses a path, they must be joined by a node. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. |
| 2 | 2018-04-27 12:25:09 UTC | chachafish | Hello, thank you for contributions. Quite a few of the roads you have added cross paths, but you did not add a connecting node. Can you review your edits and correct them? If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Thank you :) | |
| 3 | 2018-05-25 04:19:07 UTC | Irina Karachevtseva | Hello! Thank you for flagging this, we found a bug and these issues are fixed. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-25 07:04:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | What do you mean by "we found a bug"? | |
| 5 | 2018-05-29 09:34:49 UTC | Irina Karachevtseva | Corrected the intersection of the line | |
| 58522164 by erantr1 | 1 | 2018-04-29 10:13:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What is "source=Field Test"? Can you explain the source of the oneway change on e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584351065/history please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-05-06 08:40:31 UTC | erantr1 | Sorry, I meant Survey. All these changes were validated on-ground.Thanks for noticing.All the best,Eran. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-10 10:31:50 UTC | rebeccadavey | Hi,I believe that the node order for one of the parallel one-way sections of Farringdon Road near Kings Cross is now incorrect. The more southerly of the two branches (way 547168300) has a one-way direction heading northwest, whereas the node order now reflects a one-way direction going southeast.... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-21 13:10:46 UTC | erantr1 | Hi Rebecca,I looked at that way ID, but as far as I can see the node order goes NW, exactly like the one-way direction.Unless I'm missing something here.Thanks,Eran. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-21 13:25:13 UTC | rebeccadavey | Hi Eran,This was my mistake, I apologise! I thought the data I was using was up-to-date, but it wasn't and didn't include your change/fix.Thanks for your help,Rebecca | |
| 6 | 2018-05-21 13:47:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just in case it helps anyone in the future, https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=22&lat=51.526308&lon=-0.1128025 will show arrows and allow you to zoom in a bit more. | |
| 7 | 2018-05-22 08:41:00 UTC | erantr1 | Thanks Andy!And no worries Rebecca :-) | |
| 39792198 by mcheckimport | 1 | 2018-05-21 12:17:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,A quick question about this import - what was it that governed the tagging? Take as an example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422772848/history#map=19/40.62698/16.78819 . That's since been changed from man_made=chimney to building=yes, and looking at the imagery it certainly doesn't loo... |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 12:17:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Ciao,Una rapida domanda su questa importazione: cosa ha regolato il tagging? Prendi come esempio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422772848/history#map=19/40.62698/16.78819. Sembra che sia stato cambiato da man_made = chimney a building = yes, e guardando le immagini non sembra certo un camino.... | |
| 59129538 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-05-20 22:35:31 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | you are right, I put Liv the wrong side of the Viceroy, it is where the dolls house shop was, I have moved it there now |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 00:10:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! | |
| 58999529 by Greg73E | 1 | 2018-05-16 12:13:50 UTC | lefty74 | This deletion removed a large part of the north boundary of the River Thames relation. The way should be restored and the nonexistent footpath removed by changing tags where needed.I'd prefer to leave this to the @Greg73E as he has local knowledge. |
| 2 | 2018-05-16 13:29:26 UTC | Greg73E | I think I'm in over my head here. Can the way be undeleted? I used the OSM web site editor. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-16 14:34:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59020134 as requested in https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/63508/help-revert-changeset-58999529 . | |
| 4 | 2018-05-16 14:43:34 UTC | ecatmur | Removed spurious tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59020549 . Reviewing other edits by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/FrenchSuit/history | |
| 59004631 by Donaldtrumpp | 1 | 2018-05-16 09:06:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Donaldtrumpp, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I'm guessing by your edits that your part of the same organisation mapping service roads as http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ravsjith ? If so, it'd be great if you could update your details on OSM in the same way.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58975935 by charabor | 1 | 2018-05-15 22:59:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What does "removing issue segment" mean here? The current relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7390605/history doesn't make any sense - there's a "to" and a "via" but no "from".Best Regards,Andy |
| 58500784 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2018-04-28 23:31:04 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 56324492, 56324700, 56324739, 56324971, 56325089, 56325106, 56325132, 56325160, 56325188, 56325491, 56325552, 56351058, 56351143, 56351268, 56351372, 56351413, 56351517, 56351961, 56352022, 56352105, 56352315, 56352356, 56352469, 56352540, ... |
| 2 | 2018-05-12 19:16:40 UTC | bryceco | It looks like this revert destroyed data that existed prior to the changeset being reverted. For example the area around this node had ways deleted leaving orphaned nodes behind: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1725944920/history | |
| 3 | 2018-05-14 07:59:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | @bryceco Thanks for letting me know about the orphaned nodes here. What actually happened was that this user deleted these nodes (and the connected ways) as part of their changes and for some reason the revert was unable to restore the ways along with the nodes (likely a dependancy on some other no... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-15 00:04:15 UTC | bryceco | Sorry, I didn't notice that the way was previously deleted. Does the revert tool provide diagnostics when a revert partially fails? It would be great to have a note created at the location indicating it needs attention. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-15 07:27:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | @bryceco It does, but there were 9962 lines in the revert log that could need a note based on that, and I suspect adding 10k notes suggesting that "local people please to check this" might be frowned upon. Most of those were "can't revert because someone has already corrected the dat... | |
| 47099558 by Krisstimata | 1 | 2017-03-23 16:21:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've accidentally uploaded the "learnosm" test data in the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset :)I'll delete it...Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-05-10 08:16:50 UTC | alesarrett | Hi, the trees in Palma de Mallorca have the tag "name" filled with "platanero". I think that should not be the place for that information, but instead the tag "species" with "species=es", see examples at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree | |
| 3 | 2018-05-12 12:04:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | @alesarrett - this mapper hasn't been active for a year. If there's anything that needs fixing and you can fix it yourself, I'd do that.If on the other hand there is anything that you need help with, drop the data working group an email via data@osmfoundation.org .Best Regards, Andy (from the... | |
| 58755050 by Adamant1 | 1 | 2018-05-10 21:24:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for fixing! |
| 57636889 by erantr1 | 1 | 2018-03-29 18:24:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Can you explain what "split ways and removed turn restriction" means here? Also what's the source of the change?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-05-06 08:45:46 UTC | erantr1 | Hi Andy,I received an update about construction work in this part of the street and thought it would be a good idea to split in order to adapt it for the upcoming change. In any case, I can revert it if you think it's necessary. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-06 09:24:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | That doesn't explain the turn restriction https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3086416/history which was at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1312264600 ? | |
| 4 | 2018-05-07 10:39:45 UTC | erantr1 | Hi Andy,Regarding the turn restriction - I had to refresh my memory to realize why I removed it. The restriction (only_straight_on) was defined from way 230192075 to way 183555228. I was mistaken to think that it is defined from 183555228 to 230191864, which would have created a non-justified dead... | |
| 55500670 by erantr1 | 1 | 2018-01-20 15:53:58 UTC | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi erantr1,Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I've noticed that you have changed street names to the abbreviated form. It was 16th Street Northwest but you changed it to 16th St NW. Please do not shorten the long street names. The wiki says: "If the name can be spelled without an... |
| 2 | 2018-01-21 08:48:58 UTC | erantr1 | Hey,yes, my colleague already told me I shouldn't do it. Sorry about that.Thanks for commenting!Eran. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-29 18:19:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Eran,Can you tell us who you are working for? The "my colleague" comment above suggests that you might be working for someone.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2018-05-06 08:47:14 UTC | erantr1 | Hi Andy,I answered you in a private message.Thanks,Eran. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-06 09:19:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Eran,I'd suggest that you add details of who you're working for to your OSM profile (your PM to me says that you are working for someone but doesn't say who). Currently there's no information on your OSM profile at all. To pick an example of how other comapnies tend to do this, here's a som... | |
| 6 | 2018-05-07 10:46:50 UTC | erantr1 | thanks for the suggestion, Andy. We will consider it. | |
| 53387623 by FreedSky | 1 | 2017-10-31 08:38:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello FreedSky,Please use changeset comments for your edits http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/FreedSky/history explaining what you're changing and what the source is. Changes to national borders, especially where there are multiple claims, should be clearer so that all relevant parties have a cha... |
| 2 | 2017-10-31 08:39:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | 你好FreedSky，http：//www.openstreetmap.org/user/FreedSky/history说明您正在改变的内容以及来源是什么。 对国界的变化，特别是多方面的要求应该更清楚，所有有关方面都有机会看看和评论所做的改变。OpenStreetMap，所以请说明你的修改... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-09 16:11:07 UTC | FreedSky | I made some revisions based on the boundary data and actual satellite imagery. There are some discrepancies in the frontier. Of course, my guess may be wrong, but I try my best to be neutral. My amendment to this large boundary Is based on this logic, so nothing to say, I do not like to write a reas... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-09 16:11:46 UTC | FreedSky | The source is based on the data from China's official mapping bureau, and their boundary data can be consulted for comparison. | |
| 5 | 2018-02-09 17:03:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | There are two potential issues with that:1) What's the licences associated with "data from China's official mapping bureau"? Is it compatible with OpenStreetMap?2) Where this impacts the boundaries of other states there could be problems. A number of states in this region have overla... | |
| 6 | 2018-05-05 08:34:19 UTC | FreedSky | My modification of the boundary is a feeling that some places are inconsistent with actual control. For example, some ravines are clearly in one of the countries and there are roads leading to them. If you don't think this is acceptable, you can discuss or return my editor. | |
| 7 | 2018-05-05 08:35:33 UTC | FreedSky | I also understand the specific conditions of the disputed areas between the two countries. Please rest assured that I will not arbitrarily modify the actual control boundary. As a user editing in the South China Sea, I know how tortured the boundary is. | |
| 8 | 2018-05-05 08:39:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for the detailed explanation. Sometimes it might make sense to add something like that to your own changesets (because the changeset comment is limited to 256 characters) to explain the reasoning behind it. | |
| 9 | 2018-05-10 03:15:03 UTC | FreedSky | I also know that you are worried that, in fact, you can find that my series of boundary editors basically does not involve the disputed areas. It is just some of the borders identified by the existing two countries. The data used before OSM may be a bit error. | |
| 58658493 by ڕاستی | 1 | 2018-05-04 10:51:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, Rather than just saying "Fixed name" can you please explain the change in more detail? As can be seen from http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=2969761 different people have different ideas about what the name of this place should be.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58661941 by meganswatragh | 1 | 2018-05-03 22:07:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello meganswatragh,You may not be aware, but when you edit OpenStreetMap you're editing a map that everyone can see, not just your personal copy. Please do continue editing, but please do only add things that are verifiable on the ground. If you want to add a personal bookmark to MAPS.ME you can ... |
| 2 | 2018-05-08 19:05:00 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58797616 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some remaining unlikely ATMs, mostly in Northern Ireland. | |
| 58574027 by corb555 | 1 | 2018-05-02 22:19:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello corb555,Can you please add a bit more useful to each changeset rather than just "fixed road"?Best Regards,Andy |
| 57667431 by Shouptech | 1 | 2018-05-02 22:10:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OSM!Just for info - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574821941 should really have a joining node with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216269582 , so that a router can direct you between the sidewalk and the alley and vice versa. Hope you don't mind me mentioning this; ju... |
| 58363452 by upendrakarukonda | 1 | 2018-04-27 19:43:24 UTC | GITNE | Please do not add `addr:postcode` tags to `highway`s. What you meant to add was the `postal_code` tag. `addr:postcode` is for specifying address information on buildings and facilities only. Please use the `postal_code` tag. |
| 2 | 2018-04-27 20:07:04 UTC | GITNE | Btw, asking out of pure curiosity: Since when has been Bing Streetside licensed for use in OpenStreetMap? | |
| 3 | 2018-04-27 20:37:33 UTC | iandees | It isn't. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-27 20:39:44 UTC | bhousel | hey GITNE, Mapbox has an agreement which allows Bing Streetside sourced detections to be used for contributions to OSM. Some more information is available here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/daniel-j-h/diary/43242and https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/349 | |
| 5 | 2018-04-28 11:16:21 UTC | GITNE | @iandees @bhousel Thank you for the clarification. On a short note, I do not know what to think of it in terms for the OSM community but it is perfectly legal. | |
| 6 | 2018-04-29 18:39:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | @bhousel It would help to document the process in the wiki, I think - neither https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/daniel-j-h/diary/43242 nor https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/349 explain things very well. Is the imagery only available by licence to Mapbox employees? Are the results of the im... | |
| 58378215 by Constantinum | 1 | 2018-04-29 05:36:48 UTC | chachafish | Hello, thank you for your additions to OSM. Many roads you added in Denver do not exist. You are using old imagery. You created roads directly through buildings, which are clearly mapped. Please use the most current imagery when mapping. Thank you. |
| 2 | 2018-04-29 13:24:20 UTC | Witcher_UA | Hello. And thanks for the comment. For all of geometry, I added, I used Mapbox imagery. These imagery are the latest available in JOSM. I checked that some geometries do not exist in Google Maps 2018, but for legal reasons, I can not use it in JOSM. Thank you. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-29 18:25:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Witcher_UA - are you the same person as @Constantinum ? | |
| 4 | 2018-04-29 18:35:40 UTC | freebeer | Hallo Witcher,Why are you replying in the first person to a changeset by user Constantium, who is presently blocked from OSM for failing to give a satisfactory reply where organisational details are needed to be provided? Blocks are to be taken seriously, not to be treated as an annoyance to be i... | |
| 5 | 2018-06-06 09:08:17 UTC | Witcher_UA | Hello, and sorry for the late reply. Witcher_UA it's my second account that was created when I had auth problem with my main one. As far as I know there is no opportunity to delete Witcher_UA as I want it to. I'm sorry that I create so much problem with this. Now I'm understand about out-of-date ima... | |
| 6 | 2018-06-06 09:09:35 UTC | Constantinum | Hello, and sorry for the late reply. Witcher_UA it's my second account that was created when I had auth problem with my main one. As far as I know there is no opportunity to delete Witcher_UA as I want it to. I'm sorry that I create so much problem with this. Now I'm understand about out-of-date ima... | |
| 7 | 2018-06-06 10:40:30 UTC | freebeer | Hallo Ko(n?)styantyn, thanks for replying.Please note that OpenStreetMap also places great value on the Open part, both in being open to communication, as well as being about about how one works, including sources.The changeset comment allows you up to 255 characters, and I often use most of the... | |
| 8 | 2018-06-06 12:41:09 UTC | Adamant1 | I just wanted to mention that there was a thing in the newsletter (I think that was the source at least) that Microsoft has given us permission to use their street level imagery for mapping. Its a really good reference to use in places like where the note is California Freebeer mentioned that are co... | |
| 58529966 by erantr1 | 1 | 2018-04-29 16:15:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello again erantr1,In https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1819 I asked you to answer the questions that people were asking you at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7154587 . It looks like you're still not doing that - there are a number of questions that need answ... |
| 2 | 2018-04-29 16:17:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | To be absolutely clear about how to reply:Click the changeset number at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7154587 .Click in the empty box below the discussion.Type in your answer.Click "Comment".(although as you have replied to some before, you presum... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-06 08:49:23 UTC | erantr1 | Hello Andy,As you mentioned yourself, I have answered and addressed several issues raised in the past. I answered the other pending questions now.Thanks,Eran. | |
| 58506260 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2018-04-28 16:02:59 UTC | carciofo | Hi, roads were deleted in this changeset, but their constituent nodes were not, so that what remains are unconnected untagged roads... |
| 2 | 2018-04-28 16:09:19 UTC | carciofo | *unconnected untagged nodes | |
| 3 | 2018-04-28 17:10:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - can you show where? These mappers seem to have been working in teams, so there might be a few places. Obviously I'll check myself, but if you let me know where you're seeing it it'll save time. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-28 17:26:39 UTC | carciofo | Hi, I was mapping in north Broward County, FL, and noticed the nodes. It seems both nodes and ways were originally created in the same changeset as both are/were v1. This is a small example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=57250325#map=17/26.28700/-80.18459. Cheers | |
| 5 | 2018-04-28 23:31:01 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 56324492, 56324700, 56324739, 56324971, 56325089, 56325106, 56325132, 56325160, 56325188, 56325491, 56325552, 56351058, 56351143, 56351268, 56351372, 56351413, 56351517, 56351961, 56352022, 56352105, 56352315, 56352356, 56352469, 56352540, ... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-28 23:44:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | @carciofo The unconnected nodes at your example location have now gone (it took a while for the revert to complete) but if you see anywhere else showing that problem, please get in touch. | |
| 58496058 by Andreyhmk | 1 | 2018-04-28 09:45:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what the licence associated with "Bing Streetside Imagery" is please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 07:19:07 UTC | Andreyhmk | Hello Andy! We use the data "Mapbox ML Detections from the Streetside & Mapbox Satellite"Best Regards,Andrew | |
| 58413654 by meganswatragh | 1 | 2018-04-26 12:33:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Is "Rally Finish" really a caravan site, or are you just trying to make a personal map? If it's not, you might find https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ useful - you can add any markers you like in there that you want.You may not be aware, but when you ... |
| 2 | 2018-05-08 19:05:05 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58797616 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some remaining unlikely ATMs, mostly in Northern Ireland. | |
| 57981782 by Constantinum | 1 | 2018-04-24 15:52:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,All of your changesets have the comment "adding parking". Can you please provide a bit more detail about what you're adding to OSM?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-24 16:28:48 UTC | Constantinum | Hello,I adding and editing geometry of parking in this area.Best Regards,Kostyantyn | |
| 3 | 2018-04-24 16:34:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Thanks for getting in touch. Is someone directing you where and how to add parking? If so, we'd like to get in touch with them. There have been a number of groups of people being asked to make these sorts of changes (sometimes in error) and we'd like to explain to them some of the problem... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-16 05:16:14 UTC | Constantinum | Hello, and sorry for the late reply. I'm a part of [GISua](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GISua) team. Please send any general feedback on [GISua's](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GISua) work on OpenStreetMap to [Vladimir Ovramenko](https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Vladimir Ovramenko) or... | |
| 5 | 2018-05-24 17:57:48 UTC | Constantinum | Hello again Andy, thank you for letting us know. From here on we'll be more descriptive in our changeset comments.Best Regards, Kostyantyn | |
| 58377634 by Constantinum | 1 | 2018-04-24 15:47:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.You appear to be using orphan nodes added by another mapper here. Can you explain what is going on?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-24 15:48:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Привіт і ласкаво просимо до OpenStreetMap.Ви, схоже, використовуєте сирі вузли, додані іншим картографом тут. Чи можете ви пояснити, що відбувається?З найкращими побажа... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-24 16:29:09 UTC | Constantinum | Hello,I adding and editing geometry of parking in this area. Previous mapper maybe wanted to add roads on the parking lots, but add only orphan nodes. I just finished her work.Best Regards,Kostyantyn | |
| 58332320 by Premsakhare | 1 | 2018-04-24 10:16:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582837445 connects all the way through and there isn't a fence part-way down it? |
| 58361628 by Andreyhmk | 1 | 2018-04-24 10:09:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've called this changeset "adding parking" yet there are lots of way deletions in here too.Can you explain what you're doing here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-05-14 07:37:45 UTC | Andreyhmk | Hello, called the package of edits "the addition of parking lots" and corrected what was incorrectly de-indexed. | |
| 58325994 by Beckham David | 1 | 2018-04-24 10:03:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've said "gave access as private" (presumably for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582756171 ) but that doesn't seem to have been done? |
| 58359338 by MargamV10 | 1 | 2018-04-24 09:52:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583082631 is actually a service road and not just a wide cycleway or footway?Best Regards,Andy |
| 58363672 by Jonathon_9889 | 1 | 2018-04-24 09:47:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583124717 is residential? It looks just like a parking aisle to me.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58364553 by afresh | 1 | 2018-04-24 09:42:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is way 58364553 also called Blinn Avenue? The things it joins to at each end are called that.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58363542 by kirusucud | 1 | 2018-04-24 08:22:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583124126 really a residential road? It just looks like someone's driveway to me.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58362596 by adam_philips | 1 | 2018-04-24 08:00:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583117297 is an unclassified road? It really doesn't look like anything much. What source did you use here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-24 09:22:01 UTC | adam_philips | Hi Andy,I have put that by mistake.It's actually a drive way.I have made the necessary changes. Thank you for stopping by,Adam. | |
| 58363296 by Zoey Ann | 1 | 2018-04-24 07:44:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that there is access all the way down https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583122617 ? It looks like there might be a wall near the fire department. |
| 57636274 by EgrettaGarzetta | 1 | 2018-03-30 20:53:19 UTC | chillly | Errrr, surely the website is copyright. DO you have permission to use this in OSM? We take copyright VERY seriously |
| 2 | 2018-03-30 23:14:37 UTC | EgrettaGarzetta | I understand that, a little better today than yesterday; but does that mean the names of the hostels can't be used without permission or does it mean they can't be used because they're copyright? | |
| 3 | 2018-03-31 11:30:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | @EgrettaGarzetta OSM would need data released under an appropriate licence in order to be able to use it. There's some information at https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright . There's more information over at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import , and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Impo... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-23 19:58:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | As I read the thread at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-April/thread.html#21270 , YHA haven't given permission for this data to be used. Are you still working to get that permission? | |
| 57918111 by Victoria1901 | 1 | 2018-04-13 07:11:01 UTC | chachafish | Hello, you seem to have added thousands of untagged lines and nodes in your changesets. Are these supposed to represent something? |
| 2 | 2018-04-23 08:15:53 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Do you think that we should wait or delete ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577813798#map=18/33.09372/-117.21442 ? Given id=502903 I suspect that it is poorly done import of unclear data from unknown source (maybe copyrighted on top of that). | |
| 3 | 2018-04-23 09:21:55 UTC | chachafish | The creator of this changeset does not communicate. I recommend this be reverted. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-23 13:10:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Mateusz @chachafish I'm happy to help with a revert (and I'll also mention it to @woodpeck who gave the 0-hour block mesage), but what it'd be really useful to know would be which changesets out of the 30 need to be reverted? Some do look OK at first glance; some (like this one) definitely do not.... | |
| 5 | 2018-04-23 13:45:07 UTC | chachafish | Hi, and thanks for the help. I agree, some of the changesets do look okay. The only changesets that seem to be wildly incorrect are:57918111and57914505 It would be great to see them reverted. Other edits by this group of mappers have some mistakes and are a bit sloppy, but I'm able to stay o... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-23 17:51:17 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Given that it is not a newbie user trying to start with OSM but somebody trying to make import in the really poor way I am tempted to revert everything due to copyright concerns. | |
| 7 | 2018-04-23 19:42:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've reverted the two "unconnected node" changesets in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58348196 . Another mapper (possibly "on the same team") had already deleted some of the extraneaous stuff in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58342443 .Best Regards,Andy | |
| 8 | 2018-04-24 01:48:26 UTC | chachafish | Cheers! Thanks for your help :) | |
| 58342443 by Andreyhmk | 1 | 2018-04-23 18:52:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've called this changeset "adding parking" yet there are lots of way deletions in here too.Can you explain what you're doing here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-05-14 07:41:47 UTC | Andreyhmk | Hello, called the package of edits "the addition of parking lots" and corrected what was incorrectly de-indexed. | |
| 58326868 by johnny_rhodes | 1 | 2018-04-23 07:10:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582765686 is residential? It looks more like a parking_aisle to me.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58326997 by chichao | 1 | 2018-04-23 07:04:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just for info - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582768372 looks like a "service=parking_aisle" from the imagery.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58327530 by Beckham David | 1 | 2018-04-23 06:58:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Looking at the imagery, I don't think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582781017 has a corner at the south end that points west. It's in the shadows, but I'd imagine that it'd just go due south down to Beverly Park Way.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58327606 by MargamV10 | 1 | 2018-04-23 06:51:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582781701 is residential rather than a service road? It looks like just access to 1 or 2 properties to me.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58253682 by kirusucud | 1 | 2018-04-23 06:31:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just checking - is there really no access from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581800559 to the school itself? It seems odd that people at the school would have to walk to the main road and then go back into the parking area?Best Regards,Andy |
| 58278656 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-04-22 11:37:01 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | is www.openstreetmap.org/way/582066515a footpath? It doesn't appear to be tagged |
| 2 | 2018-04-22 11:37:35 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | sorry www.openstreetmap.org/way/582066515 (missed out a space) | |
| 3 | 2018-04-22 14:00:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | I don't know yet! There's a stile at the east end with a Millennium Way sign pointing west down the stray, but I don't know yet where there next sign is, or if there's a defined path down there. | |
| 58265709 by Marc Konjuhi | 1 | 2018-04-21 01:03:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any reason for switching the name order from "SR / SQ" to "SQ / SR" for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1907401314/history ? I believe it was "SR / SQ" before because it was in a Serb-speaking-majority area. |
| 2 | 2018-04-21 17:50:31 UTC | Marc Konjuhi | I thought I made a compromise with somebpody about this, but we made it different so I made a mistake there. I will reset the serb municipalities to SR / AL.Thanks for your help. | |
| 57959427 by sonmanek | 1 | 2018-04-11 19:36:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Manek Sonu,Can you explain why you've changed the way here to a footpath? Previously the source included "survey" - are you saying that the previous mapper was wrong, or what?Also all the other footpaths here are cycleable. How do you know that this one isn't?Best Regards,A... |
| 2 | 2018-04-17 08:08:50 UTC | sonmanek | hello andy,thanks for bringing this to me.I should have kept the access of bicycle=yes instead of unspecified.Best Regards,Manek Sonu | |
| 3 | 2018-04-17 12:27:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain why you've changed the way here to a footpath?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2018-04-18 22:24:01 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57960898 by premtemp2 | 1 | 2018-04-17 09:37:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain the reason for the deletion of the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5583605/history here please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 57960469 by counter_striker | 1 | 2018-04-10 06:47:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello counter_striker,What was the source of the changes here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 07:47:16 UTC | counter_striker | I have used the street sign at the entrance of Broughton street to change the access. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 12:02:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Where did you see the street sign? | |
| 4 | 2018-04-13 08:14:40 UTC | counter_striker | Please turn on the - Traffic Sign Overlay (Mapillary) then you'll see the sign between the nodes(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3426585989 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3561544523) | |
| 5 | 2018-04-13 09:17:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | That's from November 2016 though - are you sure it is still accurate? The person who took the photo looks like they might be an OSM mapper - maybe ask them or leave an OSM note so that someone local to the area can check? There are lots of mappers in Edinburgh - if a note appears it normally gets ... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-13 09:24:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Looking a bit closer - it's probably related to the changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51851320 (by the same person that took the mapillary photo). I've asked there.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 7 | 2018-04-13 09:41:50 UTC | drnoble | This road has been open for some time. I've made a few updates to the temporary arrangements based on the current state | |
| 8 | 2018-04-13 09:44:14 UTC | drnoble | Note also that the tram on York Place has been operational for several years now, and the extension down Leith Walk isn't yet approved.The construction work here relates to the redevelopment of Picardy Place as part of the ongoing St James Centre redevelopment | |
| 9 | 2018-04-13 09:54:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | @drnoble brilliant, thanks! | |
| 10 | 2018-04-13 09:58:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | @counter_striker - where is the iD that you are using hosted? It says you're using 2.4.1, but the current osm.org version is version 2.7.1. | |
| 11 | 2018-04-13 10:47:40 UTC | counter_striker | I am unaware about this version thing. could you please throw some light on it. | |
| 12 | 2018-04-13 11:27:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you click the "Edit" button above ^^ you'll get iD 2.7.1. What website are you looking at before you go into the iD editor? | |
| 13 | 2018-04-14 21:54:10 UTC | counter_striker | Actually, I am not seeing any iD. It is simply navigating into the edit window. All I see is "Zoom in to edit"PS: I have always been logged in. I hope that's not an issue. | |
| 14 | 2018-04-14 22:31:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | "iD" is the name of the editor. Move the mouse to the bottom right hand corner of the window of the latest version and it says "What's new in iD 2.7.1".The question, though, is what site are you on before you start editing OSM data? It's clearly not this one... | |
| 15 | 2018-04-16 00:54:05 UTC | counter_striker | Okay. I understood. I am seeing iD 2.7.1 and its taking me to another page(https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD) when clicked. | |
| 16 | 2018-04-16 08:57:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks.That doesn't explain why all your changesets show "iD 2.4.1" though. Which website are you using that starts iD 2.4.1 for you? | |
| 17 | 2018-04-16 10:25:36 UTC | counter_striker | I am using Open Street Map website(https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=57960469#map=19/55.95623/-3.18722)Not sure about the iD 2.4.1. I might have to recheck my changesets once. | |
| 18 | 2018-04-16 10:28:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | > I am using Open Street Map websiteUnfortunately, I don't believe that you are.Either you're using some sort of captive portal that points www.openstreetmap.org somewhere else, or you're not being entirely honest with us here. | |
| 19 | 2018-04-16 10:51:19 UTC | counter_striker | Well, I would have shared my screen if there was an option to. Tell me if something is going wrong from my end. And also suggest me to have my iD as 2.7.1. Thanks. | |
| 20 | 2018-04-16 11:09:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes - posting a screenshot at an image sharing site might help.In the meantime though, can't you just tell us who is asking you to make these edits? We'd like to help them understand a bit more about OSM, but can't do that if we don't know who they are. | |
| 21 | 2018-04-17 01:03:09 UTC | counter_striker | I have tried to see the iD. It's now 2.8.0. Let me remind you that, I am performing these edits on my own based on OSM wiki pages. I am jobless, trying to learn and contribute. | |
| 22 | 2018-04-17 08:13:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | We're grateful for your contributions, but would like to have answers to the questions raised above. A number of other mappers seem to be making the same mistakes as you did here, and it looks like you're editing based on requests from someone else. We'd like to help whoever that is more about OSM... | |
| 23 | 2018-04-18 22:24:32 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 58131019 by counter_striker | 1 | 2018-04-16 10:08:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello again,As discussed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57960469 you're still using iD 2.4.1 here. Can you explain why?Best Regards,Andy |
| 51851320 by drnoble | 1 | 2018-04-13 09:23:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Does it seem plausible that Broughton Street is (still) closed now, presumably related to the St James development? Someone's marked it as access=no based on a mapillary photo you took of the north end in 2016 (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57960469 ). This changeset suggests th... |
| 58027695 by counter_striker | 1 | 2018-04-12 08:10:10 UTC | Nakaner | Hi counter_striker,you seem to be part of a organized or commercial editing activity. Please add a note to your profile page at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/counter_striker (editable via https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/counter_striker/account) which states which company/organisation you... |
| 2 | 2018-04-13 08:19:17 UTC | counter_striker | Hello Nakaner, I am a gamer and I have started freelance mapping. I researched and found out OSM is the best of it. Hence, started my edits. I am jobless so cannot keep a company name. Pay and Software are too big things to discuss. I wish I have some workmates. But sadly I do not have any. I would ... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-13 09:03:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi counter_striker,You might find some of the links from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact helpful.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2018-04-13 09:10:30 UTC | counter_striker | Thank you for the link Mr.Andy. I am really glad to have contact channel information. | |
| 57793900 by counter_striker | 1 | 2018-04-09 12:41:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello counter_striker and welcome to OSM,"cars are seen on road" does not imply "Motor vehicle = yes". It might be any sort of access, including private.Please don't make changes like this based on guesswork.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 00:57:45 UTC | counter_striker | Changing the access to private as per your comment.Thanks for correcting me. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-10 06:47:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello counter_striker,It's not enough just to say "Thanks for correcting me" - you also need to explain why you make changes like this in future. You're still doing this - see for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57960469 .Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2018-04-13 08:23:23 UTC | counter_striker | I have been following the previous editors. I did not see anybody writing explanations for the edits. However, I am doing the edits based on the evidence(imagery). Looks like, OSM does not encourage new talents :( | |
| 5 | 2018-04-13 08:46:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello counter_striker,Thanks for your reply.OSM very much encourages new editors, but we'd definitely encourage you to map your local area first so that you can see how things look in aerial imagery relates to how they really are on the ground.Also, some of the places that you are mapping in (... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-13 08:54:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | One more thing - your edits seem to be part of a series of co-ordinated edits, some of which mappers have suggested might be in error. Some people in the OSM community have suspected that you're part of this group and are being paid to make these edits.If you make worldwide changes that are in er... | |
| 7 | 2018-04-14 21:55:30 UTC | counter_striker | I have updated my bio with my information. I hope all the prejudice got some clarity.Ragards. | |
| 8 | 2018-04-18 22:24:58 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 58025093 by veerasatya | 1 | 2018-04-12 07:39:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579127004 connect with the adjacent footway at all? |
| 2 | 2018-04-13 04:16:52 UTC | raju atava | i have created the way to the adjoining house.the footpath was created about an year ago by some one else...its not this "someone else" anyhoww..... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-13 04:21:18 UTC | raju atava | please let me know if my edits are contradicting with anything? if so, how? | |
| 4 | 2018-04-13 07:26:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | @raju atava - you've made one edit with that account - http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54586327 - and this account (ravsjith) has made 279 so far. Maybe you're the same person? (which is OK - in OSM many people have more than one account). | |
| 5 | 2018-04-13 07:32:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | There's nothing wrong with adding new things to the map - I just asked whether the footways connected or not. Are you familiar with the area?Incidentally, (@ravsjith), you can see the other changesets where users have asked questions at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid... | |
| 57957673 by pattamatta | 1 | 2018-04-12 09:57:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello pattamatta,Is there any reason why you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449139305/history here? Please note that there has been a lot of redevelopment here and the Bing aerial imagery is very out of date.Why did you choose to edit this road in Hucknall? Did someone give you a li... |
| 2 | 2018-04-13 00:33:13 UTC | pattamatta | Hi Andy,I remember editing this road and I am pretty sure I actually wanted to connect Titchfield Street and Torkard Way together. However I don't remember deleting any segment. My intention was to make a connection between the two roads which are now connected with a small footpath segment. If ... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-13 01:46:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | The point is that they actually don't connect - the Bing imagery is wrong. The Esri imagery is more up to date, but to do it properly you would need to actually go there. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-18 22:26:34 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57930779 by sonmanek | 1 | 2018-04-12 14:17:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure about the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83871869/history here? I can understand why you're confused that a road joins a bridleway, but how do you know that this is the road that is wrong, not the other one?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 21:08:14 UTC | robbieonsea | A cursory look at other sources such as Bing, OS_OpenData_Streetview & NLS OS:1:25K sources suggest this is a track/service road to an isolated place in the middle of the Welsh hillsides.Clearly bridleway is closer to reality than an unclassified road, although personally I would have made it ... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 23:09:32 UTC | trigpoint | I can add some local knowledge here, this is a track leading to a what looks like a derelict farm, it is not a bridleway although I do not know its legal status.The road labelled Mountain Track, some name tag abuse, is certainly not a bridleway. It is a track and based on experience the access=no ... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-18 22:25:04 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57308060 by Shiva theja ramishetty | 1 | 2018-04-12 13:06:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, Would it be possible to provide a bit more detail about what "improper road directionality and geometry" means please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 57994658 by veenabs | 1 | 2018-04-12 13:02:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello veenabs and welcome to OSM,What was the source of the "changed to one way" here? Are you just looking at imagery, or have you actually visited the area?Best Regards,Andy |
| 58029614 by Suchitra | 1 | 2018-04-12 12:15:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain the source of "Changed road Access information" here please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 58029885 by Raghavendra T | 1 | 2018-04-12 12:13:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain the change you made here? I don't understand what "not routable path" means.Best Regards,Andy |
| 57996984 by Raghavendra T | 1 | 2018-04-11 19:43:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Raghavendra T,Just wondered how you knew that this road should be one way?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 10:57:27 UTC | Raghavendra T | I have edited based on GPS traces | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 12:09:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Which GPS traces were these? | |
| 58021916 by Raghavendra T | 1 | 2018-04-12 06:15:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Raghavendra T,What was the source of the direction change here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 11:25:49 UTC | Raghavendra T | I have done based on GPS traces | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 12:08:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Where did you see the GPS traces? | |
| 58023538 by charabor | 1 | 2018-04-12 06:20:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello charabor,Why have you chnaged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23618254/history from living_street to residential? There's no reason why you can't have parking rules on a living street and no reason why people can't drive there, it's just a different sort of street.If you have got any qu... |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 06:37:42 UTC | charabor | If you check access for such street before my edits it was motor vehicle access=not specified,which restricts vehicle movement & the tag is ambiguous,since vehicle movement & mapillary data shows that vehicle is permitted I felt it should be modified. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 07:43:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | > If you check access for such street before my edits it was motor vehicle access=not specifiedWhere does it say that?If you have got any questions please do ask other mappers - don't just change a road from a type that you don't understand to one that you do. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-12 08:47:23 UTC | charabor | it was there in the living street bBEFORE I EDITED,thats why I updated the street attribute,please read the comment carefully before replying back.In case I have doubts I will definitely contact OSM members. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-12 08:58:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | > it was there in the living street bBEFORE I EDITED,I asked "where does it say that" and you didn't answer the question. Do you mean "in the online OSM editor that you are using", or something else?> please read the comment carefully before replying back.You're real... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-12 09:23:40 UTC | charabor | Yes,exactly. OSM editor,I meant that,you wish to know anything specific? | |
| 7 | 2018-04-12 11:59:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | For the record, there are at least a dozen different OSM editors. Your changeset details above suggests that you are using "iD", which is the default one.In order to be sure that your change from living_street to residential is correct, you'd need to survey it in person. You are just g... | |
| 8 | 2018-04-13 19:33:49 UTC | freebeer | Andy,the default newbie editor iD is not the one this user is using, as the few times I have fired up iD before it gets killed off, I see a much more recent one, and I don't know what URL would give me the ancient 2.4.1 which no doubt appears very different than what I can see..Charabor, you h... | |
| 9 | 2018-04-18 22:25:12 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57960018 by Godfather-DonCorleone | 1 | 2018-04-12 07:57:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,It looks like there's still a problem with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121746864 . It previously connected to a bus stop by mistake. It now joins Station Road but still connects to the bus stop by mistake.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:24:43 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57960473 by __thanos__ | 1 | 2018-04-12 07:53:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Why have you changed the access to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18619235/history ? The previous edit to this road makes it clear that access was based on bollard locations.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:24:11 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57926355 by charabor | 1 | 2018-04-09 12:33:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "fixed directions" means please?Also, what was the source of the change?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 03:03:40 UTC | charabor | acronym for changing bi-directional to oneway or vice versa. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 05:30:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | How did you know it needed changing? | |
| 4 | 2018-04-12 05:37:13 UTC | charabor | vehicle directions,traffic cams | |
| 5 | 2018-04-12 05:45:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | What was the licencw associated with that source? | |
| 6 | 2018-04-12 05:55:45 UTC | charabor | multiple sources in edit in browser you can find vehicle direction,mapillary data & also my frequent traveling colleagues who have prior experience of area visit. | |
| 7 | 2018-04-12 06:26:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Now it sounds like you're just making stuff up. Please link to a specific source of this specific change. Note that all changes to OSM have to be subject to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability . | |
| 8 | 2018-04-12 06:32:35 UTC | charabor | I think its pretty evident from simple vehicle directions in OSM itself, if you care to check that at least once instead of pointlessly arguing over the same thing,if in a street you see vehicles going in both directions in aerial imagery then most of the times its bidirectional. I don't understand ... | |
| 9 | 2018-04-12 06:43:17 UTC | charabor | I assure for the record that changes are made based on logic & evidence,if %age of human error is accounted for I think the corrections are at par with other mappers,hopefully we can all cooperate & do improve OSM data. | |
| 10 | 2018-04-18 22:24:07 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 58021937 by Suchitra | 1 | 2018-04-12 06:14:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Suchitra,What was the source of the access change here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 58024416 by veerasatya | 1 | 2018-04-12 06:07:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello ravsjith and welcome to OSM.Please use more meaningful changeset comments rather than just "added the missing roads" every time. What was the reason that you added these roads here? What was the source?Best Regards,Andy |
| 57994793 by Roshni_p6 | 1 | 2018-04-12 06:02:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Roshni_p6,Can you explain what "left restricted" means here?Also what was the source for your change?Best Regards,Andy |
| 57929974 by Premsakhare | 1 | 2018-04-09 09:29:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you explain why you made this change? The previous two editors of this way are both local to Derby, and are familiar with the area. Why do you think they are wrong? |
| 2 | 2018-04-09 09:32:59 UTC | will_p | How do you know Thorntree Lane is bidirectional? You clearly haven't visited the location. I can see from the aerial imagery that the road is very narrow, so it is likely to be oneway. Additionally the mapper who originally added the oneway did so after surveying the area on the ground.I recogni... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-09 11:50:11 UTC | kreuzschnabel | The German forum has just become concerned about these edits too. Maybe a mapping party being not aware that they are editing not in a playground sandbox but within a live database used by others in real time? | |
| 4 | 2018-04-09 11:58:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | @kreuzschnabel Could you drop the DWG a mail please? Just so that we have the full list of accounts involved.I don't think that it's a mapping party, as they appear to be working exclusively in business hours UTC+5. My guess is that some company is trying to "fix" OSM routing but doe... | |
| 5 | 2018-04-09 12:21:12 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Done. | |
| 6 | 2018-04-10 10:35:22 UTC | Dave Venables | This section is definitely oneway. No egress onto Morledge. Clear no entry sign at the western end of this short stretch of Thorntree Lane.Mirror image of the other end; one can enter Thorntree Lane from Saint Peter’s Street or Morledge but must leave via Exchange Street. Entry from Morle... | |
| 7 | 2018-04-11 17:45:04 UTC | Dave Venables | Entrances to Thorntree Lane from Morledge and Saint Peter's Street both now correctly show one way.I've added a note on Exchange Street as it is currently just marked as Pedestrian only and I suspect there is a limited and conditional use by vehicles exiting Thorntree Lane to get to Albert Street.... | |
| 8 | 2018-04-11 18:26:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Dave yes - I reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57999066 . | |
| 9 | 2018-04-18 22:26:50 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57099613 by sachinv | 1 | 2018-03-12 19:25:57 UTC | gappleto97 | Hey. Just letting you know that all your recent edits got flagged on OsmCha for "unknown iD instance". You might want to check your editor to make sure that this isn't a big deal. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbo... |
| 2 | 2018-04-11 12:28:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | @sachinv - which iD instance are you using? | |
| 57958636 by wolverine9696 | 1 | 2018-04-11 10:10:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello wolverine9696,Can you explain how it is possible to make the change that you have just made based on aerial imagery alone?That does not seem possible to me.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:27:07 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57960486 by nakamuraa | 1 | 2018-04-11 10:07:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello nakamuraa,Can you explain how it is possible to know the access rights here based on aerial imagery? Please don't just guess!Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:26:21 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57858851 by galithot | 1 | 2018-04-11 06:42:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1886 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1848 .No reason has yet been received for these access changes (this example is one of many). |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:24:55 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57586438 by galithot | 1 | 2018-03-28 21:28:09 UTC | paulbiv | It's not a 'feature' and it's not a service road. Whatever gave you that idea? It's a High Street, Roman road etc. Them previous classification of highway=pedestrian is far closer. Are you a an armchair mapper? On the ground wins ALWAYS in OSM. |
| 2 | 2018-03-30 09:29:38 UTC | galithot | Hi Paulbiv, I have done the edits based on the aerial imagery available. Apologies if that were not matching with the ground truth. Hence edited. Thanks for reverting my edits. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-30 09:45:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi galithot,Can you also explain why you made this change _here_? You are making changes in lots of geographically separated areas which suggests that you haven't actually visited the places in question. Are you part of some project, and if so, what is that?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behal... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-11 02:18:33 UTC | galithot | I have made the edit using Remote Mapping technique and following the instructions on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-11 06:32:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | @galithot Please answer the question. | |
| 6 | 2018-04-18 22:22:22 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57958692 by __thanos__ | 1 | 2018-04-10 06:41:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello __thanos__,Can you please explain what the source of the access changes here was?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:25:08 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57959923 by __thanos__ | 1 | 2018-04-10 06:38:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello __thanos__,Can you explain how the footpath joins the road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436161937 ? It seems to do so at a stile (see https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=18&lat=50.819913&lon=-1.558656 ), which seems very unlikely.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:24:05 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57588367 by sri_harsha | 1 | 2018-04-09 21:21:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any reason why you've deleted the big area of tarmac at the top of Cromford? Has the road layout changed?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-11 19:40:08 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further informatio... | |
| 57891178 by Dubistnurrum | 1 | 2018-04-09 21:16:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - you've added this by mistake in the middle of the Atlantic. Perhaps something went wrong in OsmAnd? |
| 57933856 by __thanos__ | 1 | 2018-04-09 12:45:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello __thanos__ and welcome to OSM,Can you explain the source of your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23415395/history please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:27:09 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57930059 by Premsakhare | 1 | 2018-04-09 09:21:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | You have changed the highway=construction to a highway=residential here (but left the construction tag), and claim that you used Esri World Imagery, yet that imagery clearly shows the road as being still in construction.What is your source that the road is now complete? |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:22:34 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57812806 by yxoc | 1 | 2018-04-04 23:35:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - that bus route goes through the middle of the Atlantic? |
| 2 | 2018-04-05 06:03:19 UTC | yxoc | That is indeed quite unusual for a Paris urban bus line ;-) Thanks for having spotted this. If I am not mistaken you have already removed the bogus node, right ?Thanks -yxoc | |
| 3 | 2018-04-06 23:09:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes, I've already deleted it.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 57730892 by Syed Mujeeb | 1 | 2018-04-06 20:09:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Syed Mujeeb,Something's gone wrong here, I think. If you look at http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=57730892 which shows the new things added in a changeset in green you can see that a new "straight line" has been added by you.It might not have been anything you did wro... |
| 57650148 by musaib ali | 1 | 2018-04-06 19:44:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What was the source of the access changes in this changeset? As the roads have been left, the access rules make no sense.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:24:31 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57649779 by musaib ali | 1 | 2018-04-05 08:53:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/2956475/history is oneway at all? |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:26:10 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57456116 by JoseMayoral | 1 | 2018-04-04 23:27:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 57796737 by Syed Mujeeb | 1 | 2018-04-04 22:39:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35282553/history please? It looks like (as with many of your previous edits) you're just guessing without actually surveying properly at all. Given the aerial imagery that is available it's very unlikely that all of Lime Road... |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:26:08 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57796153 by yaswap | 1 | 2018-04-04 22:29:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello again yaswap,What's the source of the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24037112/history ? I suspect that it's unlikely to be unclassified, but how do you know that it's a footway and not something that allows perhaps cycle or horse access as well?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:22:21 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57618516 by Syed Mujeeb | 1 | 2018-04-03 12:44:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain why you removed the "private" tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452932832/history ? Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:26:26 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57649794 by Syed Mujeeb | 1 | 2018-04-02 20:06:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OSM!What prompted you to look at the ESRI imagery inside fmr RAF Leconfield and add http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574640753 there?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:26:28 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57701750 by Mrninja2001 | 1 | 2018-04-02 11:26:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Mrninja2001 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!One quick request - would it be possible to use more meaningful changeset comments? Currently you're using "............." which doesn't explain what you've changed and why. Something more helpful would be something like "re-traced ri... |
| 56982582 by yopaseopor | 1 | 2018-04-02 11:06:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello yopaseopor,As I understand it this edit removed some data from OSM which has now been re-added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57695251 . Are you happy about the current state of the data now - presumably what was missing has now been restored?Also - one more question - what do... |
| 2 | 2018-04-02 11:07:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | (en español)Hola yopaseopor,Según tengo entendido, esta edición eliminó algunos datos de OSM que ahora se han vuelto a agregar en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57695251. ¿Estás contento con el estado actual de los datos ahora, es de suponer que... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 21:57:31 UTC | yopaseopor | No, I think you misunderstood it. Read it. completely http://yopaseopor.blogspot.com.es/2018/04/no-no-estoy-contento-no-im-not-happy.html | |
| 57465607 by Flynn Marquardt | 1 | 2018-04-02 09:53:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what the change was here? "Fix boundary Moocco" doesn't really explain what you did. In particular, are the relation memberships on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29119691#map=13/35.8944/-5.3466 correct?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-03 06:38:30 UTC | Flynn Marquardt | Hi Andy,here is a longer description with typo correction:Fix boundary Morocco by by adding missing way 44630799 as inner.Longer explanation:- boundaries must close!- a changeset before my change left an unclosed/open border regarding Ceuta- I just (re) added the missing way to make to... | |
| 57708109 by JamesBourne | 1 | 2018-04-01 22:00:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Any reason you've added network=National_Rail to Darley Dale? To get on the national rail network you'd have to cross to the other platform at Matlock.Best Regards,AndyPS: I was sat in a queue at the level crossing earlier today while some old LMS coaches went past with a steam engine at... |
| 2 | 2018-04-02 09:23:09 UTC | JamesBourne | Andy,Thanks for the heads up - have ammended that to 'Peak Rail' and added usage=tourism tags to that line.RegardsJames | |
| 3 | 2018-04-02 09:28:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks James! | |
| 57730894 by ygudeti | 1 | 2018-04-02 08:58:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello ygudeti,Can you explain the reasoning behind http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575467466 please? What is the source that this and the adjacent flare are both in fact parking aisles? What is the source of the fact that the northern one is eastbound and the southern one westbound? In Bel... |
| 57683213 by JÉT | 1 | 2018-04-01 21:49:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for this - it's great to have contributions "from the inside" of industrial sites etc. However, would it be possible to use changeset comments that are a bit more descriptive? "ÉT" on every changeset doesn't really help anyone understand what's changed...Best Re... |
| 57717417 by jan_olieslagers | 1 | 2018-04-01 18:45:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Who's "we"?OSM's position on names is covered in the wiki here - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only . |
| 2 | 2018-04-01 19:09:50 UTC | jan_olieslagers | Thank you for chiming in, critically yet politely.I must admit that the "we" is a bit of "pluralis majestatis" - it really is my own personal opinion. Yet it is an opinion grown over the years, and over ample discussion.1) aerodromes should really not be nameless. There hav... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-01 19:22:02 UTC | JKHougaard | There already is an access=private tag. It is up to the data user to interpret and display the appropriate tags so that the end user (the pilot in your example) has the correct information.Frankly I do not agree with your story of a qualified pilot finding a random airstrip in OSM and deciding to ... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-01 19:28:14 UTC | jan_olieslagers | @JKHougaard: you are entirely right, we cannot be considered responsible for the interpretation of the data we present. Still, is that a sufficient reason to NOT give this particular field a "name=" tag? There are hundres of little airfields around Europe that are not in any official sourc... | |
| 5 | 2018-04-01 19:42:34 UTC | Hjart | My opinion is: Mappers inventing names is BAD. Airfields and other objects in OSM should be tagged with verifiable official names only. Anything else will eventually lead to confusion.Maps used by aviators should display the content of access tags. | |
| 6 | 2018-04-01 19:48:07 UTC | jan_olieslagers | @hjart: first of all my apologies for misspelling your id higher up. That said: surely an official name is to be preferred, but if there is none than it is better to do our best than to offer nothing at all. What name is given can be discussed, and edited, asnd changed, and changed again, but no nam... | |
| 7 | 2018-04-01 19:56:58 UTC | Hjart | I also think it's now time to remove "invented name" from other airstrips. I think you'll have to come up with better cope with nameless airstrips.No name is not bad and certainly not "the worst there can be".Not respecting access=private tags etc is worse. | |
| 8 | 2018-04-01 20:07:25 UTC | jan_olieslagers | There you are mixing up two points. On the one hand I am glad to agree that tags like "private=*" are very important, and should be respected. On the other hand I insist we cannot be TOO clear; so we should use all means available, and the "name=" is one and a very prominent one.... | |
| 9 | 2018-04-01 20:08:18 UTC | jan_olieslagers | And what do you mean with "better cope with nameless airstrips"? | |
| 10 | 2018-04-01 20:11:23 UTC | Hjart | I meant "you'll have to find better ways to cope with nameless airstrips". Inventing names for them is not good and will not prevent cases like the one you gave above. | |
| 11 | 2018-04-01 20:18:20 UTC | Hjart | I personally think a lot of people will disagree with adding "private" or "public", whatever to names of all aerodromes just to "clear" the way you describe. | |
| 12 | 2018-04-01 20:19:12 UTC | jan_olieslagers | Sorry, I really cannot agree. Are you really meaning to say that "name=" should only be tagged if an official source is given? If so, how do you define "official"? For an extreme example, what was the official source for the "name=" in node 2318851468 ? Are you really g... | |
| 13 | 2018-04-01 20:29:36 UTC | Hjart | Yes, I think that "name=" should be tagged only if the airstrip has an actual official name. I researched this airstrip and found that it's private and doesn't actually have an official name. I think inventing one is wrong.The node you mention can be verified by going to http://vscs.dk/b... | |
| 14 | 2018-04-01 20:38:05 UTC | jan_olieslagers | Again sorry, but you do nothing to convince me. There is nothing official about the source you mention. That this name has been invented by someone else does not make a difference, it is not an official name so it is an invented name - if I follow your reasoning.But you may find me an official s... | |
| 15 | 2018-04-01 20:43:22 UTC | jan_olieslagers | And may I also refer to the pointer by @SomeoneElse at the very beginning of this discussion: I could find nothing there to imply that only "official" names can be used. But the article seems to care little about aerodromes. | |
| 16 | 2018-04-01 20:46:53 UTC | Hjart | Nothing is being "hushed up" here. You invented this name even though you are not the owner or in any anyway affiliated with this particular airstrip, right? Just like you invented names for a gazillion other airstrips around the map?Please note that another mapper (apparently with more ... | |
| 17 | 2018-04-01 20:50:34 UTC | jan_olieslagers | What has "being the owner" to do here? Has only the owner the right to add a "name=*" tag?The arguments are becoming more and more remote, there must really be something dark behind it all. Why not call an apple an apple? Why not call an Airstrip in Slagelse an Airstrip in Slag... | |
| 18 | 2018-04-01 20:51:46 UTC | Hjart | @jan the link given by SomeoneElse says "If something really doesn't have a name, don't add a name to OpenStreetMap"This airstrip doesn't actually have a name, so don't add one. | |
| 19 | 2018-04-01 20:57:05 UTC | jan_olieslagers | You are only saying it does not have an "official" name. Again, a dog is a dog and a train is a train and an Airstrip in Stragelse is an Airstrip in Stragelse. Allow me to insist: what is so very wrong about giving this one airstrip a name, even if it is not offical? Your insistence - agai... | |
| 20 | 2018-04-01 20:58:27 UTC | Hjart | Another mapper removed the name you invented for this airstrip (because of lack of verifiability) and I've put the noname=yes tag back. Please respect it | |
| 21 | 2018-04-01 20:58:42 UTC | jan_olieslagers | (apologies for the typo - s/Stragelse/Slagelse/g) | |
| 22 | 2018-04-01 20:59:39 UTC | jan_olieslagers | Sorry, I won't - but I will not enter a reversal war either. | |
| 23 | 2018-04-01 21:03:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | @jan_olieslagers Any name for an object must be verifiable by other mappers - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability for details. Something that you made up isn't a name, it's just a description. | |
| 24 | 2018-04-01 21:11:29 UTC | jan_olieslagers | Thanks again, @SomeoneElse. Can it be verified that an apple is an apple? Can it be verified that an Airstrip in Slagelse is an Airstrip in Slagelse? May an apple be given the name "apple" May ... ?? | |
| 25 | 2018-04-01 23:58:18 UTC | Hjart | @jan, Please see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/62884/inventing-names-for-essentially-unnamed-private-airstrips | |
| 26 | 2018-04-07 19:27:26 UTC | JJIglesias | My Opinion: Any Airstrip to be "legal" needs some kind of approval by the Aeronautical Authorities; and that Authority publish the location of each one of those airstrips, with certain characterists like longines and orientation of the airstrip. Name is NOT mandatory, but lenght, orientati... | |
| 27 | 2018-04-07 19:43:46 UTC | jan_olieslagers | Thanks, @JJIglesias. I have resigned to the existence of aerodromes with no name, though it feels to me like "a pub with no beer" :) And I certainly agree that we are NOT producing the AIP or any other official kind of data. However I cannot agree with you that all aerodromes (in the broad... | |
| 57638893 by EgrettaGarzetta | 1 | 2018-03-29 20:54:55 UTC | ndm | OpenStreetmap is about what is actually present -- you shouldn't change names that are from on-the-ground surveys.Plus, you would have to have a licence from YHA to use their copyrighted material on OpenStreetmap. |
| 2 | 2018-03-29 21:02:02 UTC | ndm | I suggest you discuss it on the talk-gb mailing list before making further YHA-related edits. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-31 10:46:37 UTC | ndrw6 | Personally I think ndm's interpretation of project quality standards and copyright laws is overly strict and should not be treated as an official opinion of the osm community. (neither should be mine) Indeed it is good to discuss larger contributions like this in public, and perhaps get yha invo... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-31 11:17:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | As ndm says, the best place to discuss things like this with the wider GB community is https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb . Good luck! | |
| 5 | 2018-03-31 17:52:57 UTC | ndm | https://www.yha.org.uk/ has "© 2017 YHA (England & Wales)". Like OpenStreetmap has "© OpenStreetMap contributors". If you believe the second is important -- then so is the first.Anyway, If there's agreement on the mailing list then there's less likelihood of cha... | |
| 57590923 by osm update | 1 | 2018-03-30 08:20:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | As requested previously in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1331 please do use meaningful changeset comments. "create changeset" is not a meaningful comment. Also what is the source used here? |
| 57621383 by musaib ali | 1 | 2018-03-29 08:05:36 UTC | will_p | I didn't know Player Street had reopened to motor vehicles. For avoidance of doubt, please could you confirm that you have visited this location or let me know which source you used to know the access has recently changed. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2018-03-30 02:07:09 UTC | musaib ali | i made this change reviewing the fact that the access for motor vehicles was open on both ends of player street, so considering this I changed the access for the middle segment of player street to yes, if you have any local information regarding this you can go ahead and change it. Thanks. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-30 08:13:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | @musaib ali Please don't make changes like this based on just guesswork or aerial imagery (where you can't see signs at ground level).Can you also explain _why_ you made this change here? You are making changes in lots of geographically separated areas which suggests that you haven't actually v... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-18 22:23:49 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57425838 by cgoods-gamut | 1 | 2018-03-22 19:27:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-03-22 19:56:31 UTC | cgoods-gamut | Sorry about that. There's a Hello World code snippet I found on the Web that I ran. Did not realize it was changing things.Thanks,Connor | |
| 3 | 2018-03-22 20:24:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks.I've tried talking to the people behind osmapi at https://github.com/metaodi/osmapi/issues/66 , but I guess your code snippet actually hardcodes the live OSM server? Whereabouts was the code snippet that you found? Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2018-03-22 20:27:25 UTC | cgoods-gamut | It's actually on the wiki.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OsmapiIn the section 'Full Example' | |
| 5 | 2018-03-22 20:34:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Ha! I never thought about looking there. I'll have a go at changing it. | |
| 57327281 by International Circus Stardust Entertainment | 1 | 2018-03-19 20:08:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. For your data to be acceptable for inclusion in the OSM database it must be verifiable on the ground to other mappers. It doesn't look like your business has a physical presence at this area. Your website does not give an address. Thus your data ought be removed... |
| 2 | 2018-03-19 21:23:16 UTC | International Circus Stardust Entertainment | Hi Bernard,Thank you for your reply.To tell you the truth, I’m not totally sure how OpenStreetMap works. I thought it was something like Google maps or IOS maps. I was just trying to promote my business.You are correct that my business does not have any physical presence at the address. ... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-20 08:35:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Shaun, I see and accept from your link that you operate the business from that address. However, this can only be a virtual address, which is what you say.The problem for OSM is that features ought to be verifiable on the ground. I quote from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practi... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-20 19:30:18 UTC | International Circus Stardust Entertainment | Hi Bernard,I live and work from Hastings, on the sunny south coast. I recently deiced to get a registered business address for my company, Kemp House, 152 – 160 City Road, London. The reason I did this was to give my company a more professional appearance. I only recently came across Open ... | |
| 5 | 2018-03-22 19:04:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,OpenStreetMap isn't a business directory - as Bernard said, it's designed for things that are geographically verifiable. For example, the Moorfields Eye Hospital is verifiable by anyone (there are lots of signs for it) but if you've just got a mailing address in a building on the City Road the... | |
| 56113615 by erantr1 | 1 | 2018-03-19 11:39:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, just wondering what the change was here? You've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398622386/history from service to unclassified - was that based on local knowledge or survey or something else? It certainly doesn't look like an unclassified road in the imagery.Best Regards,Andy\... |
| 2 | 2018-03-22 15:15:55 UTC | erantr1 | Hello Andy,Thanks for letting me know.I made this change about a month ago, probably by mistake. I will revert to service highways.Best regards,Eran. | |
| 57074263 by Ant Ko | 1 | 2018-03-11 11:28:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Ant Ko,Can you explain the source of the data used here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-03-18 12:04:59 UTC | Ant Ko | The source of this data should be my brain, and hopefully, in the Kawthaung Development Committee's plans... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-18 12:46:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | How did the information get into your brain? Did you read if from somewhere else? If so, where? | |
| 56856510 by UAN51 | 1 | 2018-03-14 23:25:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, The history of a couple of things here http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=498377008 and http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=522453556 seem to show that there's some sort of edit war going on. Do you have any evidence of the signage on the ground? What the Public Works uses isn't r... |
| 2 | 2018-03-15 08:50:19 UTC | UAN51 | According to the survey I took around Dec 2017/Jan 2018, the following signs were along North Antioch Road (remember, Doyotek and I were arguing about the prefix):On Kansas City's jurisdiction:-"N Antioch Rd" signs existed in 29 intersections (including north of Happy Rock Park; majori... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-17 10:38:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I've commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56838729 . | |
| 56838729 by Doyotek | 1 | 2018-03-14 23:23:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OSM!You mention that you "keep having to fix this", and http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=498377008 and http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=522453556 do show that there's some sort of edit war going on here. Do you have any evidence of the signage on the g... |
| 2 | 2018-03-15 00:25:36 UTC | Doyotek | Then how do we handle the name of the road when 1 street sign says just "Antioch", "NE Antioch". then "N Antioch"? The Newer signs all say "NE Antioch" and they are randomly placed along the route. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-15 00:33:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | If part isn't obviously one and another part the other, perhaps pick the most common variant? That's what I did with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95467361 (just up the road from where I live). There 5 out of 6 signs have one version and 1 another, so I went with the "5 out of 6" nam... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-15 00:44:17 UTC | Doyotek | Its not that. Problem is that the city has been slowly replacing the signs back to NE Antioch as needed. Its starting to be randomly put back to the official name. Problem is that there is also another road that actually is N Antioch. | |
| 5 | 2018-03-17 10:37:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'd go with the on the ground value, even if it's "wrong" by some official definition. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56856510 suggests that "N Antioch" is currently the most popular value. If that's the case, I'd go with that version, until more signs are replaced and... | |
| 55979006 by marc__marc | 1 | 2018-03-16 17:41:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | There seems to have been a problem with this edit in that it has affected https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241758144/history which was not touched by wheelmap at all. Where a mapper has explicitly added an "unknown" access value it makes sense to leave it - for example I'll quite often t... |
| 2 | 2018-03-16 21:43:25 UTC | marc__marc | Hello,This ae was not a "bug fix only". the wheelmap bug was only the "start point" (and the main "feed") to discover this problem.For my documentation, you are right. i didnt update it, the current description was the one used at the begging of the German talk.... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-17 10:07:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've updated the link to better describe the edit - thanks for that."wheelchair" is a bit different to other access tags in OSM (with other access tags "yes" normally means "a legal right to", with wheelchair it means "physically accessible").As previous... | |
| 56127378 by Verdy_p | 1 | 2018-02-09 13:29:41 UTC | Verdy_p | This was done in rawedit (which still offers no way to add edit comments); this added more evident dictinctions in names, between land areas and admin boundaries |
| 2 | 2018-03-15 00:10:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What exactly is "Jersey (land mass)"? That looks like a description rather than a name. If you want to have a relation for that, fine - but please don't make up names for things like that. Also, this does look very much like an undiscussed mechanical edit...Also, this is a ver... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-15 00:18:12 UTC | Verdy_p | Raw edit is a set of individual edits on isolated tags. There's no way in it to create separate changesets, they are closed automatically but after long time (only made by the server, not by that editor).The names for landmasses are not rendered on map, but they do no represent the whole area so y... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-15 00:20:59 UTC | Verdy_p | An no this was absolutely not "mechanical edit", they were done individually at very small speed, with raweditor, over a long perdiod of several hours using other editors.If you know how to force "rawedit" to close its open changeset...Why did I use rawedit, it's because for ... | |
| 5 | 2018-03-15 00:28:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | "Jersey (land mass)" is not a name, it is a description.Re "RawEdit", you might find https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Level0 more functional. | |
| 6 | 2018-03-15 01:40:10 UTC | Verdy_p | Except that rawedit is integrated with other tools that propose to use either it (simple and fast for minor tag changes), or JOSM (too slow for these cases)The names are consistant witrh other names for Landmass and were used because of confusion of admin boundaries and the fact that soime people ... | |
| 7 | 2018-03-15 01:41:40 UTC | Verdy_p | Note: "Jersey" alone would alsop be incorrect ! Jersey is larger than that.The name is already fully descriptive of the intended use.It will never cause any problem in searches of boundaries.... | |
| 8 | 2018-03-15 17:50:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hu Verdy_p,Please don't be so argumentative - I'm trying to help you here!With regard to names, their use in OSM is well-established - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only . By those criteria "Jersey (land mass)" is not a name. The actual name for b... | |
| 9 | 2018-03-15 17:57:28 UTC | Verdy_p | This method of naming differently has been used everywhere else since the beginning, because there were confusions betwee ndistinct objects (and Nominatim was also confused and did not allow making the distinction between landmasses and admin boundaries, but also because various contributors changed... | |
| 10 | 2018-03-15 18:01:20 UTC | Verdy_p | Note: the OSM website (here). Does not allow seeing distinctions easily (the types of objects are NOT specified at all in list of members or list of parent relations).So confusion is extremely frequent when this OSM site does not make any difference, but just displays the "name" tag, the... | |
| 11 | 2018-03-15 18:03:58 UTC | Verdy_p | Remember that these "names" found landmasses are never rendered at all with labels on maps because they are NOT boundaries. They are just used by reference from other objects or selected and found by specific tags.May be iD and this site should display at least the "note" tag, ... | |
| 12 | 2018-03-15 18:17:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Another well-established principle is that we do not tag for the renderer, or how it appears in a search engine such as nominatim, or how it appears in an editor such as iD, or on this website. "Jersey (land mass)" is not a name, and shouldn't be assigned the name tag.Also, yes, I am ... | |
| 13 | 2018-03-15 18:25:36 UTC | Verdy_p | So you want to reverse a decision that was taken long time ago by other people (not me) to use distinctive name without even asking them why they chose that convention? And you don't care at all about the confusions that were made (which was why I made this changeset to solve duplicates or incorrect... | |
| 14 | 2018-03-15 19:43:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | > So you want to reverse a decision that was taken long time ago by other people (not me) to use distinctive name without even asking them why they chose that convention?Can you please point to such a "decision"? The best description of how we map names in OSM includes https://wiki.o... | |
| 15 | 2018-03-15 21:08:21 UTC | Verdy_p | I've not tagged for the renderer. FULL STOP. I have used existing conventions (sused since long). FULL STOP. I have solved incorrect tagging caused by confusion. Names are accessory but still essential for editors. the iD editor still does not make any distrinction when selecting relations, you hav... | |
| 16 | 2018-03-15 21:09:06 UTC | Verdy_p | In summary: I did not use any incorrect tags, I fixed them to remove duplicates or incorrect references between unrelated areas. | |
| 17 | 2018-03-15 21:18:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | > In summary: I did not use any incorrect tagsSo where (in Jersey or elsewhere) can I go to find the name "Jersey (land mass)" then? Or is it just a "name" that you made up? | |
| 18 | 2018-03-15 21:19:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | But the more serious question is: why it's always _you_ that seems to be having these discussions? What is your theory as to why this happens? | |
| 19 | 2018-03-15 21:21:13 UTC | Verdy_p | The incorrect tags (notably using type=boundary and boundary=administrative) or references caused also severe rendering problems for the international borders or some regional borders: they were discontinuous because queries for borders retrieved two unrelated relations, and renderers tend to elimin... | |
| 20 | 2018-03-16 13:05:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's happening again (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Verdy_p#Route_relation:_Roles_forward:stop:.3Cnumber.3E_etc._on_page_Relation:route ) so I'll ask the question again:Why it's always _you_ that seems to be having these discussions?What is your theory as to why this happen... | |
| 21 | 2018-03-16 14:09:56 UTC | Verdy_p | Why is it only you that inists on what is not an issue at all ? Stop this harassment. | |
| 22 | 2018-03-16 14:20:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's a genuine question, honestly - most people don't have lots of people complaining on their wiki talk pages.Why do you think it happens to you? | |
| 23 | 2018-03-16 15:30:20 UTC | Verdy_p | "lot of people is your interpretation" actually this is very small to the number of thank you I receive directly.You are just harassing me for sometinh which is absolutely not an issue anywhere and don't want to recognize that I solved really incorrect tagging that caused real problems.\... | |
| 24 | 2018-03-16 15:38:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | > "lot of people is your interpretation" actually this is very smallNo - most people don't have multiple archives of complaints on their wiki talk page. I'm trying to understand why this is happening to you and if there's anything that can be changed that would avoid it.> Yo... | |
| 25 | 2018-03-16 17:30:40 UTC | Verdy_p | Only because I'm above average users, just means there is a higher chance of friction occuring with just a few (like you do) for things that are in fact not even a problem or just because of personal opinions. Landmasses could even have no name it all (they are never needed for rendering), but since... | |
| 26 | 2018-03-16 17:41:58 UTC | Verdy_p | This was documented since long first in Germany https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:land_areaA name attribute is allowed, but the doc never says it is mandatory, its value is completely unspecified and it can be omitted completely. If it is there it is just a helper for contributors bu... | |
| 27 | 2018-03-16 18:03:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | On the issue of "land area relations" (the original issue here, but less important than the way that we work together as mappers) the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:land_area page just says "name" - i.e. "add the name of the thing". It does _not_ say &... | |
| 28 | 2018-03-16 18:09:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | ... and on the more important issue:> Only because I'm above average usersBy _quantity_ of _wiki_ edits, certainly.However, looking at your wiki talk page and at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=90780 there does seem to be a consistent problem. Have you ever r... | |
| 29 | 2018-03-16 18:11:07 UTC | Verdy_p | You're inventing interpretations.Since the begining it has always included accurate disambiguation. These landmasses are ***not*** the countries/regions, it has alwyas been a ***part*** of them.You're just continuing to fight against what is actually not a problem at all anywhere.The diusambig... | |
| 30 | 2018-03-16 18:17:21 UTC | Verdy_p | for your most recent reply: you continue making personal attacks. and asserting false things about what I do or think.I replied, you refused and argumented, and you don't want me to argument ? Sorry but you are not trying to find any solution, your going to nowhere.You retierate your arguments, ... | |
| 31 | 2018-03-16 18:33:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Many of these landmasses have their own defined geographical name distinct from the admin boundaryThere are examples of this - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/375761 is genuinely named "Mainland" and is part of the Orkney Islands. However the "landmass" names are s... | |
| 32 | 2018-03-16 18:38:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | > you continue making personal attacksWhat in my comments above constitutes a "personal attack"? The fact that I've linked to your wiki talk page? Throughout I've tried to be positive (e.g. "https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only is how OSM handles name... | |
| 33 | 2018-03-16 18:52:34 UTC | Verdy_p | "Map what is on the ground" is not applicable. There's no such tyhing on the ground. So these names can ONLY be descriptive and should be made accurately so that it it is still distinct from what would be really on the ground...This is a case where any choice (with or without the disambi... | |
| 34 | 2018-03-16 20:03:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | I don't understand most of what you're trying to say here, but to be clear, I am simply trying to explain some of the key principles of OSM (in each case linking back to what documentation we have), and am asking questions about why you find yourself in conflict with so many people in OSM so much of... | |
| 35 | 2018-03-16 20:32:32 UTC | Verdy_p | When I do make errors, I recognize them immediately, and correct fast. But you've not conveinced me that there was an error, so it is an unfruitful discussion. Nothing wxas decided, but you want absolutely from me that I reply to you that I was worng or made an "error" or that I'm "wr... | |
| 36 | 2018-03-16 21:22:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | > But you've not conveinced me that there was an error, so it is an unfruitful discussion.Unfortunately, that's not how "compromise" works.Also to be clear it's not just "my opinion against yours" - I've quoted accepted OSM best practice (and linked to the relevant article... | |
| 37 | 2018-03-17 01:46:36 UTC | Verdy_p | STOP STOP STOP!You are saying "You're wrong since the begining", and have given NO proof at all that there was any error or problem.STOP THIS HARASSMENT WAR ! I absolutely don't have to ackowledge your different opinion, keep your opinion and I keep mine, but NO there has been NO dem... | |
| 38 | 2018-03-17 02:04:37 UTC | Verdy_p | that I had effectively corrected bugs, but you insist on something else that is a NON-ISSUE and NOT what I really corrected, pretending that this name has a semantic value, when in fact it has no value except for contributors using the editing tools as a useful hint (because this name has NEVER been... | |
| 39 | 2018-03-17 02:07:10 UTC | Verdy_p | And you pretend that I said only "you're wrong" to you, this is an invention you do! You have constantly used only this argument yourself against me. And you've never presented any evidence. I showed you evidences that whhat you want has NEVER been decided and that it contradicts all past ... | |
| 57201898 by Nop | 1 | 2018-03-15 18:05:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - you've deleted the weather buoy at lat 0, long 0 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900/history along with the other stuff you deleted at "null island".Also, what has "iD" to do with anything? It's _JOSM_ that has the "feature" of adding new objects at ... |
| 2 | 2018-03-15 19:57:09 UTC | Nop | So both editors have the problem. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-15 20:01:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you point to a series of previous examples where it happened with iD? I keep an occasional eye on edits here via whodidit, and I don't remember a systematic problem with iD. The biggest current source of problems are probably people testing osmapi like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/5... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-15 21:36:52 UTC | Nop | - Start iD without coordinates- press "zoom in to edit" and you're there | |
| 5 | 2018-03-16 12:38:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you point to a series of previous examples where it happened with iD? (I've undeleted the missing Pirata buoy node BTW) | |
| 57212812 by amith reddy | 1 | 2018-03-15 20:08:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 45111013 by Verdy_p | 1 | 2017-09-06 18:00:37 UTC | FahRadler | thats no roundabout!!!-> a kind of turning loop |
| 2 | 2017-09-06 18:52:55 UTC | Verdy_p | where, I've looked at all of them individually, may be there's some invisible signs that could say the opposite | |
| 3 | 2017-09-06 18:53:35 UTC | Verdy_p | Exceptions to this is extremely rare in France. | |
| 4 | 2017-09-09 09:30:37 UTC | FahRadler | i´ve been there, that a turning loop | |
| 5 | 2017-09-09 10:04:30 UTC | Verdy_p | such comment in not useful if you don't specify "where" | |
| 6 | 2018-03-15 00:12:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Verdy_p is this another mechanical edit? Maybe if your change was in a smaller geographical area and not a whole country you wouldn't have to ask "where" when someone asks about the validity of an object in it. | |
| 57081255 by Carlos de Gouveia | 1 | 2018-03-11 14:36:05 UTC | pitscheplatsch | Hi Carlos de Gouveia, welcome to OSM.Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? Furthermore, can you revert your changes?Thanks. |
| 2 | 2018-03-13 17:51:18 UTC | Carlos de Gouveia | I'm sorry, didn't realise what I did. I will delete the data if I can find it. If you have access to it (before I get to find it) please would you revert it? I will use the test server as you suggested. Apologies. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-13 18:27:52 UTC | Carlos de Gouveia | Hi, I have no idea how to revert this change set. Will this need to be done via the api? Or is there a procedure I can follower on my browser? Appreciate the assistance. Thanks, Carlos | |
| 4 | 2018-03-13 20:23:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Actually, I deleted it yesterday... | |
| 5 | 2018-03-14 05:16:11 UTC | Carlos de Gouveia | 👍 | |
| 56899885 by scrapperuk | 1 | 2018-03-06 20:52:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OSM!I'm afraid something looks to have gone very wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288800325 etc. - it's merged all of the tags from the individual sections of former railway together, and most of them don't apply to any one individual segment. Compare for example ... |
| 2 | 2018-03-06 21:11:31 UTC | scrapperuk | Hi AndyI'd be happy for you to correct my error, and apologies for any inconvenience caused. I guess the learning curve is a little steeper than I first thoughtThat particular segment is one that I've been heavily involved in physically creating by converting a disused railway into a useable p... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-07 09:32:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I'll have a look when I get a chance (probably later on today). | |
| 4 | 2018-03-13 00:52:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | OK - that should be done now. I've applied the tags that had been merged into the whole length (foot=permissive, highway=path, horse=permissive, motor_vehicle=no, mtb:scale=1, name=Clowne Branch Line, surface=unpaved) into each section and left the bridges etc. as they originally were. The "l... | |
| 57126162 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 56766355, 56766813, 56767007, 56770101, 56795529, 56797073, 56797532, 56807682, 56807734, 56824164, 56824410, 56824681, 56824975, 56825248, 56825272, 56825455, 56825547, 56851527, 56851778, 56852074, 56852261, 56852329, 56853406, 56853663, ... |
| 57005507 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56941668 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008777 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912517 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56876453 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56853406 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56853663 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56854719 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56824975 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56825547 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005540 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56851527 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56825455 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56852261 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56807734 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56797073 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008746 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912273 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005529 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005967 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56824681 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56766813 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56854534 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57007314 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005518 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57007703 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008092 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008581 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912225 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008880 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57007357 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-11 21:53:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello GeoBeau,Please don't add imaginary data to OpenStreetMap. Can you please explain what you're trying to do - then people might be able to help.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-03-12 03:15:57 UTC | GeoBeau | Hey all.Some comments are telling me that OSM is not for making this type of map :( ...and some are trying to help.... ??? I just needed a free program for a one time trail map. Realized that OSMhad limitations but the export output was in .pdf . Therefor after I worked around the limitations an... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-12 19:23:05 UTC | Viajero Perdido | You left behind a mess.Do you feel any sense of obligation to clean it up? Because someone will have to. | |
| 4 | 2018-03-12 22:02:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you want to "just create a one-off map" then something like https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ is probably your best option.I'll have a go at tidying the test data here, by the way. | |
| 5 | 2018-03-12 22:10:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba | |
| 57005603 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912331 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57006973 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56854065 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005650 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56797532 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56941730 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008664 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005570 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005397 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56853939 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56855259 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912467 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008982 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56941695 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57006292 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912442 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56767007 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912371 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56941784 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56854739 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008729 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56852074 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005861 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56852329 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56851778 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56824410 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57007490 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56854385 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56854856 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912123 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56824164 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56941712 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008696 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912563 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57009298 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-09 14:15:38 UTC | Glenn Plas | What are you doing here ? You seem to be totally missing the point of Openstreetmap.You're going to have to delete a lot here although it's doubtful you're going succeed in doing this on your own. It's even hard to explain why there are so many wrongs here. OSM is not meant to be used to c... |
| 2 | 2018-03-12 22:10:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba | |
| 56854310 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005435 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57007587 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56807682 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56825272 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56770101 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008960 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56766355 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912420 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57009123 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008821 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005481 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008915 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56825248 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56856598 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005421 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57009064 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56795529 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005889 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 54811771 by Marreberendsen03 | 1 | 2018-03-12 20:19:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548338260 seems to be a square area of water in the middle of the Atlantic. Is it in the wrong place, or did something else go wrong?Best Regards,Andy |
| 56993136 by loescher | 1 | 2018-03-09 12:30:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | "Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 56956243 by bugmenotplzemailname | 1 | 2018-03-07 08:36:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. I've deleted the rest of the recent doodles. |
| 2 | 2018-03-07 08:44:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Actually, one more thing - if you spot any more of these please drop a mail to data@osmfoundation.org (even if you've already deleted them). | |
| 56933633 by أ ش | 1 | 2018-03-06 13:26:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello ألبرشت شونكا,Please use meaningful changeset comments for your changes - it helps everyone else understand the reasoning behind and the source for the changes.In this case I'd agree that an English language name doesn't make sense for the "name" tag here, but can y... |
| 2 | 2018-03-06 13:31:00 UTC | أ ش | Yes, often the communication is a problem in OSM.Maybe we should made an arrangement that both tags are used, e.g. "هەولێر / أربيل"What is your opinion for a solution?With best regards | |
| 3 | 2018-03-06 13:35:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | That approach is certainly used in some places in OSM when there isn't an obvious "most popular" value for that name. Given the "to and fro" edits that the name has seen "هەولێر / أربيل" is probably better than most of the orther alternatives. | |
| 56903476 by Anitha ganesan | 1 | 2018-03-06 11:15:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 56852460 by Tedros | 1 | 2018-03-03 18:56:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | (for info for anyone looking at this changeset)It's currently being discussed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1792 and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=686927#p686927 . If there's no clear answer there about why the previous status quo was wrong it'll get revert... |
| 56681964 by Jaypep | 1 | 2018-03-03 12:56:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I think that something's gone a bit wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4417115790/history here. Your change changed the name to "virus" rather than "Song Tan" or some variation. What I suspect happened was that MAPS.ME submitted a change based on out-of-date ... |
| 56834619 by Askdl0990 | 1 | 2018-03-03 09:03:04 UTC | pitscheplatsch | Hi Askdl0990, welcome to OSM.I think you should not remove such descriptions. For me this looks some kind of #vandalismMore details about your changes: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56834619 |
| 2 | 2018-03-03 11:31:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain how you know that the service road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456788673/history that you've deleted no longer exists?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 3 | 2018-03-03 11:31:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | こんにちは、あなたが削除したサービス道路https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456788673/historyがもう存在しないことをどのように知っているのか説明できますか？宜しくお願いします、アンディ | |
| 56598546 by dominique hoavonon | 1 | 2018-02-25 05:30:10 UTC | chachafish | I noticed you have imported hundreds, maybe thousands of buildings around the area of West 25th Avenue and Sheridan Boulevard, Denver, Colorado. These buildings do not represent what is on the ground. Perhaps you made this import by mistake? Did you contact local mappers for a community buy-in? Did... |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 21:51:03 UTC | dominique hoavonon | Bonjour, merci pour les retours, au fait je ne suis pas un débutant dans OpenStreetMap. Je ne sais pas ce qui s'est passé, souvent je test les imageries pour voir leur netteté, mais je vais ce qui s'est passé sur ces derniers modifications, si c'est décalage ou si ... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-26 03:12:13 UTC | chachafish | Hello, thank you for your reply. While you are trying to decide what went wrong with your import, will you please remove all of the thousands of buildings you have added to the Denver area? | |
| 4 | 2018-02-26 19:17:12 UTC | dominique hoavonon | Bonjour, pas besoin de suprimer les batiments je vais juste les modifiés conformement à l'imagerie Bing. Vous pouvez m'aidez à la modification si vous avez un peu de temps. Merci | |
| 5 | 2018-02-27 08:59:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Juste pour être clair, vous avez ajouté des bâtiments à Denver (aux États-Unis) pour https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1318. | |
| 56654104 by Dave Stanley | 1 | 2018-02-25 11:45:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just for info, I've commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56470373 (the previous change). Erbil's been the subject of "edit wars" over language as you can see at http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=599019138 with most common version being CKB (Central Kurdish).Best R... |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 14:23:27 UTC | Dave Stanley | I was not aware of the edit wars over this. I was there last month and I know people from that region. From what I have seen, Erbil is the common spelling, though I accept it is often transliterated as Arbil. Wikivoyage has just changed their page from Arbil to Erbil to align with Wikipedia. Fro... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-25 15:15:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Erbil's the English name, but what is the most commonly used on-the-ground name? Is it "هەولێر" (central Kurdish), "أربيل" (Arabic) or something else?If you were there last month I suspect that you have more up to date knowledge about what's actually called what t... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-25 16:00:20 UTC | Dave Stanley | The vast majority of what I saw was Erbil. It is worth having a look at the talk page for Erbil at Wikipedia as there is a fair discussion there. I do not read Arabic or Kurdish, so I cannot comment on those. | |
| 5 | 2018-02-25 16:06:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Wikipedia just says "Today, Erbil is both multi-ethnic and multi-religious" which isn't tremendously helpful :)> I do not read Arabic or Kurdish, so I cannot comment on those.Never mind - worth a try! | |
| 56648956 by Tedros | 1 | 2018-02-25 12:06:55 UTC | SimonPoole | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56648956 |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 13:52:30 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56661596 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits around Somalia | |
| 3 | 2018-02-25 15:25:00 UTC | Tedros | How is this political motivated edit? When in Somalia the official language is Somali? Why does state and cities have to bear Arabic names? It is like giving American cities German names? Really strange!! | |
| 4 | 2018-02-25 15:55:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Tedros That's the changeset comment of the reverting changeset. Among the things that you deleted was the disputed area of Somaliland: http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=3586169 . The change to http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=424317039 was odder - you removed the name tag altog... | |
| 56645156 by Tedros | 1 | 2018-02-25 12:01:44 UTC | SimonPoole | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56645156 |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 13:04:23 UTC | wambacher | And removing existential tags from boundaries (e.g. boundary=administrative) is really, really wrong.btw: editing boundaries using iD is a high risk of damage. use json. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-25 13:05:46 UTC | wambacher | sorry: Use JOSM, not iD | |
| 4 | 2018-02-25 13:18:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | @wambacher In this case I'm not sure that that's a good idea :) | |
| 5 | 2018-02-25 13:52:38 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56661596 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits around Somalia | |
| 56644529 by Tedros | 1 | 2018-02-25 12:01:22 UTC | SimonPoole | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56644529 |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 12:40:11 UTC | Tedros | Hi Simon, This is not an actual border but error it should be administrative border. However I understand your reply. Where should I report this next time? Thanks.Tedros | |
| 3 | 2018-02-25 13:07:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | What has "Article 2 (4) of the Charter..." to do with OpenStreetMap?Note that the OSMF has a a policy on disputed territories - see https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf for that. | |
| 4 | 2018-02-25 13:52:37 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56661596 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits around Somalia | |
| 56470373 by Danny Gagdou | 1 | 2018-02-25 11:39:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello (and welcome to OpenStreetMap!) - I'm trying to understand the reason for the name change here - as you can see from http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=599019138 the "name" tag for this place has been changed in OSM many times. Generally the "name" tag is used for a ... |
| 50568336 by Johnwhelan | 1 | 2018-02-21 21:45:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any idea what https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4887456774/history should actually be tagged as? |
| 2 | 2018-02-21 23:39:08 UTC | Johnwhelan | If you do a Crtl<H> in JOSM it will give you the history. I changed _id to id.If you contact the first mapper who added it they maybe able to give more details.John | |
| 56503321 by Principality of Andany | 1 | 2018-02-19 21:21:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Do you have any source for the "Gulf of Andany"? Normally "survey" would be a perfectly valid source, but in this case I suspect it's highly unlikely that there is a sign with "Gulf of Andany" on it in the middle of the sea. Please provide details of the source that... |
| 2 | 2018-02-19 21:55:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Actually scratch that - it's obvious from your other recent changes that you have made. | |
| 56251803 by Vigilante | 1 | 2018-02-11 12:54:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | What evidence do you have for the use of cyrillic within Kosovo? As Ifar as I can tell from outside even within Serbia cyrillic use isn't 100% (see for example https://www.b92.net/ ). The Kosovo government's website http://kryeministri-ks.net/?page=3,1 doesn't use it, and the Serbian government us... |
| 2 | 2018-02-11 15:19:05 UTC | Vigilante | Kosovo (Albanian: Kosova/Kosovë; Serbian: Косово]) is a disputed territory and partially recognised state[11][12] in Southeastern Europe that declared independence from Serbia in February 2008.Kosovo's constitution says official are both: albanian and serbian. If serbian i using two alp... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-18 10:52:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | I asked for examples of use of cyrillic within Kosovo and you didn't provide any. What script the Serbian OSM community is using is irrelevant; also note that https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2088990 has "name:sr=Косово и Метохија" it's perfectly possible to create ... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-18 18:56:23 UTC | Vigilante | Open thread about it in the forum, and it will be discussed. | |
| 5 | 2018-02-18 20:08:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Which forum do you mean?Here is a perfectly reasonable place to ask questions. | |
| 6 | 2018-02-18 20:19:44 UTC | Vigilante | Yap, but, there is no notification. I should search edit after edit. Personal message is ok? | |
| 7 | 2018-02-18 20:22:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | You should get an email notification for every message here - not sure why that's not working. Maybe go to osm.org and check the addtess there? | |
| 8 | 2018-02-18 20:29:40 UTC | Vigilante | Empty mailbox... Nothing.I will change with other mail tommorow.****This is my sugestion about it. http://myprintscreen.com/s/1518985600.04726712.png | |
| 9 | 2018-02-20 20:41:23 UTC | Marc Konjuhi | Google is not OSM, and in addition to that, in the territory of Kosovo, Serbian is used in latin form, also in new laws, street signs etc. OSM works with the reality on the ground, and the reality on the ground is that there´s the rRepublic of Kosovo with the administration in Prishtina, and t... | |
| 56151423 by shqiperietnike | 1 | 2018-02-18 12:31:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello shqiperietnike,Here you've changed the "name" of tag of http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=448739405 , a Serb-majority place in Kosovo. Please don't try and enforce your language on other map users. Back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37745579 I wrote "Ле... |
| 2 | 2018-02-18 12:32:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | (përkthim automatik)Përshëndetje shqiperietnike,Këtu ju keni ndryshuar "emrin" e tagut të http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=448739405, një vend me shumicë serbe në Kosovë. Ju lutemi mos provoni dhe zbatoni gjuhën tuaj në p&e... | |
| 56460664 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2018-02-18 11:38:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | The name was reverted back to "pre-edit war version". See http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=2088990 , and specifically http://osm.org/browse/changeset/56450586 which just changed the name without useful comment. |
| 56387571 by siffash | 1 | 2018-02-17 11:32:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello siffash and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Unfortunately we can't use wikipedia as a source for OpenStreetMap as the licences aren't compatible. Can you find a source for this name somewhere elsewhere that has a compatible licence?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-02-17 14:00:28 UTC | siffash | Hi Andy, thank you for your tip! Will keep it in mind. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-17 14:03:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | No problem. Any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask! | |
| 56416279 by Amiroch | 1 | 2018-02-16 23:42:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | The explanation behind the country names used here can be found at the answer that I gave to the help question https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/53812/contested-border-sahrawi-morocco-decision-to-display .Essentially OSM has its own rules for "what constitutes a country" (and in... |
| 56382069 by babayeb | 1 | 2018-02-15 22:47:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.Best Regards,Andy |
| 56231409 by Ismaeldiarria | 1 | 2018-02-14 00:00:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello - I think something went a bit wrong. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5402631563/history is in the middle of the sea?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-02-14 10:35:07 UTC | Ismaeldiarria | Thank you Andy Else for the correction.Regards.Abdoulaye | |
| 56255258 by dipikabadri | 1 | 2018-02-13 23:58:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 56301544 by jorgeluisztr | 1 | 2018-02-13 23:58:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 56332855 by Lululal2210 | 1 | 2018-02-13 20:22:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've created https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5410611721 as a tourist attraction, but it's actually already mapped. Also, please do reply when people have tried to contact you - you can see a list at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7603634 . If you don't peop... |
| 2 | 2018-02-13 22:35:51 UTC | Lululal2210 | Bonjour,Je vous prie de m'excuser pour les localisations que j'ai ajoutées, je n'avais pas compris qu'elles étaient publiques.Je n'ajouterai plus rien à partir de maintenant et me contenterai d'utiliser les localisations existantes.Bien cordialement,Ludivine | |
| 56275188 by Lululal2210 | 1 | 2018-02-13 20:20:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5406090521 is surely not a "tourist attraction"?Best Regards, Andy |
| 56229941 by HubMiner | 1 | 2018-02-10 05:37:30 UTC | maxerickson | Smaller bounding boxes please. |
| 2 | 2018-02-10 16:26:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've added a fixme to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4549740520 "Name is "second something" but what?". The answer to the question "something small enough to be carried into a shop and valuable enough to be worth doing so" - but that's pretty much the definition ... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-10 16:27:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - my mistake. It was me that added the fixme, but I've actually been there since and not updated the map. Sorry for the noise! | |
| 56171668 by BlueDream | 1 | 2018-02-08 11:54:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 56070070 by Xish Xehman Bangladesh | 1 | 2018-02-05 10:18:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello again,You've been warned before about adding unlikely data to OSM - I somehow doubt that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5381100564 is really an "aerialway=station". Please only add tags that actually make sense.Best Regards,Andy Townsend (on behalf of OSM's Data Working Gr... |
| 56013801 by technoprox | 1 | 2018-02-04 21:30:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please use more descriptive changeset comments rather than just "Fixing" - that doesn't really help other mappers to understand that changes that you are making here.Best Regards,Andy |
| 55855467 by Shahed Naeem | 1 | 2018-01-30 10:11:58 UTC | Claudius Henrichs | Hi,It seems with this changeset you accidentally added a few very long untagged ways that encompass the whole globe. I removed those four in these two changesets:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55888507https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55888571Would be good if you could revie... |
| 2 | 2018-01-30 10:23:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also, it'd be really useful if you could use meaningful changeset comments that explain the changes that you're making. "#hotosm-task-502 #OSMBD #BHOOT #MissingMaps #Mapillary #BOIL #Pathao" doesn't mean anything at all - it's just a meaningless string of letters. | |
| 55456105 by triducsuz | 1 | 2018-01-19 02:50:46 UTC | Qwertii | Did you verify this data? Some of it seems to be incorrect. |
| 2 | 2018-01-21 03:02:30 UTC | CloCkWeRX | That... should probably be reverted. Orrong Road as 60? Maybe, but the rest? | |
| 3 | 2018-01-21 04:14:09 UTC | Qwertii | This user seems to enter a lot of incorrect data using streetcomplete and doesn't reply to comments. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-25 22:46:19 UTC | triducsuz | Hello to all,I will only respond to this matter out of all the alleged "issues" being flagged. I am new to this and only an occasional user. Not good at this and I was trying to learn it and add valued input. If you are flagging my inputs as issues, then I suppose you must have better ... | |
| 5 | 2018-01-30 10:18:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi triducsuz - thanks for your reply. If you're using StreetComplete presumably you can say "yes, I've been to Lansdowne Road (just to pick an example), and the speed limit really is 60 all the way along it"? Or did you perhaps make a mistake? It's useful to fill in tags such as surface... | |
| 55740996 by unknownPurger | 1 | 2018-01-28 11:11:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello unknownPurger,https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5260275/history is mapped as a relation with just one outer way. Is there a reason why it's mapped as a relation rather than a way? Is there perhaps another way to be added to it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 55740101 by unknownPurger | 1 | 2018-01-28 11:09:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello unknownPurger,You've removed the "name" fromhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4422767/history but left the "ref" (which looks pretty unlikely for a ref - it looks more like a description).What actually is the name and the ref here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 55802936 by azizchaibou | 1 | 2018-01-27 14:42:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5358438540#map=19/13.49525/2.09384 is and what the tag means please? It's not really clear. Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-27 14:42:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bonjour,pouvez-vous expliquer ce que https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5358438540#map=19/13.49525/2.09384 est et ce que le tag signifie s'il vous plaît? Ce n'est pas vraiment clair.Meilleures salutations,Andy | |
| 55710789 by Djibrill nafoga | 1 | 2018-01-27 14:40:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5358827724 mean and what the source is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-27 14:40:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bonjour,Pouvez-vous expliquer ce que les tags sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5358827724 signifient et quelle est la source?Meilleures salutations,Andy | |
| 48986055 by Corban8 | 1 | 2017-12-16 09:12:44 UTC | int_ua | What exactly is "Kaart Ground Survey" and why are you adding POIs with this horrible spelling? At least in some case these POIs duplicated already existing ones with proper names. |
| 2 | 2017-12-16 18:43:02 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | Я думаю це копіпаст з Гугл стрит в 'ю а бо з напряму з гугл мапи Відправити у смітни к буде саме вірно | |
| 3 | 2017-12-22 13:53:03 UTC | Corban8 | The ground survey is images obtained from the area. I tried to do the best I could with the spelling from the imagery I had to go off of. If it is incorrect then please feel free to make the proper corrections. I apologize for any large mistakes and would appreciate any useful feedback on proper spe... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-22 16:14:04 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | for you the languages with the Cyrillic alphabet are alien. You have made mistakes in the letters. I would advise to study the letters Cyrillic, or to map only objects in Latin letters.Also, only the first letter of the first word is written in bold. If the name contains several words then there... | |
| 5 | 2017-12-23 12:58:35 UTC | int_ua | Can you please provide the image used for adding https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4872757829 ? I've been there several times and don't remember anything similar, here is the current state https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/T010C_SjnKEuGSKRD6IUNAIn other words, can you prove that these edits are no... | |
| 6 | 2018-01-26 10:40:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Corban8,As suggested, would it be possible to cross-reference your edits here with Mapillary traces, and perhaps make your photographs available (with the date that they were taken) so that local mappers can compare?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. | |
| 7 | 2018-02-01 16:29:26 UTC | garylancelot | Andy,I am a member of Kaart and am working directly with Corban on this project. We traveled to the Ukraine in hopes to add beneficial contributions to the map in that area. As part of our process, we filmed the area using one second time-lapse footage from three different angles. I will provide... | |
| 8 | 2018-07-26 17:12:37 UTC | ConsEbt | Hi Garylancelot, have you ever provided a link to the images as offered? | |
| 53878719 by keithonearth | 1 | 2018-01-25 00:25:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Belated thanks here for trying to add a bit of neutrality to the dispute here! |
| 2 | 2018-01-29 06:14:13 UTC | keithonearth | Thanks for the positive feedback! :-) | |
| 55726039 by MembersOnly | 1 | 2018-01-25 00:00:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello MembersOnly,Can you explain this edit please? It doesn't make a lot of sense. Also what is the source?Best Regards,Andy Townsend |
| 55717437 by GeoThings | 1 | 2018-01-24 17:19:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Some of the tags used on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144705720 here (sepecifically "building:basement=YES" seem odd. Can you explain why you're using "YES" in uppercase here?Also "building:basement" as a tag isn't used elsewhere in OSM - there are other... |
| 2 | 2018-02-08 10:13:31 UTC | GeoThings | Andy:Thanks for your remind! It's our fault to use uppercase in this building, would change it soon.Also, since we already have discussion with other mappers, tag "building:basement" is the proper way to mark a building having basementBest Regards, GeoThings | |
| 54370061 by lethanhduc11 | 1 | 2018-01-23 23:36:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello lethanhduc11 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Among the things you've added here are a "pokemon go" tomb and a Vietnamese named bank. Do these things really exist?Best Regards,Andy |
| 55435350 by SK53 | 1 | 2018-01-17 22:29:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi - I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553075716#map=17/53.13572/-1.29515 is a golf hole/fairway/whatever rather than woodland? |
| 2 | 2018-01-18 13:35:26 UTC | SK53 | Yes, rather obviously! | |
| 25255143 by fitzsimons | 1 | 2018-01-15 10:09:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that the shoe shop https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276871620/history isn't inside a phone box - presumably there's a phone box one side or other of the shop? |
| 2 | 2018-01-15 11:23:41 UTC | fitzsimons | It's too long ago to remember much about this edit. The phone box is the one next to the postboxes at the DO. I can't see a shoe shop inside it. Are you seeing something I'm not? | |
| 3 | 2018-01-17 21:49:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | I was looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276871620 which has tags "shop=shoes" and "booth=KX100" on it. Maybe http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=276871620 shows the change clearer? | |
| 4 | 2018-01-17 22:22:54 UTC | fitzsimons | Well spotted. I see what you mean. Hopefully all sorted now. | |
| 55505130 by mbforr | 1 | 2018-01-17 21:06:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Just checking - has the name of the lake officially changed now? Someone added a note last July saying "The Community Advisory Committee recommended changing the name of the lake to Bde Maka Ska, but until the name is legally changed we should keep the name... |
| 2 | 2018-01-17 21:09:08 UTC | mbforr | It has been approved by Hennepin County:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Calhoun | |
| 3 | 2018-01-17 21:14:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - although that says "The change needs final approval at state and federal level in order to go into effect" presumably the change at county level is good enough for OSM? | |
| 55318658 by lcmortensen | 1 | 2018-01-17 10:01:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - the rail construction up to but not including https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319607231 is now marked as complete? Should the bridge be complete too? |
| 51268311 by mikkolukas | 1 | 2018-01-15 15:10:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added an "area" unclassified road at the magic roundabout https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7462227 - I don't think that that actually exists does it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-15 15:11:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - my mistake - you didn't add it, someone else did! | |
| 3 | 2018-01-15 18:12:31 UTC | mikkolukas | I just added more details. I believe the attempt is to show the area occupied by actual road.Proposals for solutions to these kind of situations are made but none are ratified yet. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-15 18:14:36 UTC | mikkolukas | The area could be marked as highway=primary (and split to secondary/tertiary where appropriate) | |
| 5 | 2018-01-15 18:29:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes, it's more of an "area:highway=blah" rather than anything else I think. That's usually the preferred way of mapping "road areas". | |
| 11913301 by Richard | 1 | 2018-01-15 15:15:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Whilst trying to work out what had happened to the Magic I noticed "ref=(45)" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2235672/history - is that a legit ref (in a "leading to NCN 45" kind of way?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-15 16:43:05 UTC | Richard | Pretty much - NCN 45 was originally 'braided' through Swindon with two possible routes; Sustrans has demoted one of them to a bracketed link route (as it has done in several places). | |
| 51022656 by Gabriel Reynolds | 1 | 2018-01-15 15:12:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added an "area" unclassified road at the magic roundabout https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7462227 - I don't think that that actually exists does it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 55009948 by parukhin | 1 | 2018-01-15 13:11:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Is adding spaces to opening hours (as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464539974/history ) really required? |
| 2 | 2018-01-15 13:33:52 UTC | parukhin | No, not really. But it make opening hours more comfortable for human reading. It's result of JOSM validator opening_hours "prettifying" options. (Adding spaces after ";" deleting after "," capitalization first symbols (mo-fr) etc. | |
| 52969730 by Yorvik Prestigitator | 1 | 2018-01-15 10:04:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/585425702 shouldn't be an amenity=telephone any more? |
| 55383289 by BlinkingNora | 1 | 2018-01-12 16:24:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello BlinkingNora,Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219187602/history is commercial? It doesn't look it on the imagery.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-12 16:26:12 UTC | BlinkingNora | Hello Andy, yes the imagery is rather outdated as a lot of shops and other retailers have opened up right near the Body Shop down the road. :) | |
| 3 | 2018-01-12 16:34:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! Are there still houses at the western end? If so you could split it in two and have residential at once side and commercial at the other. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-12 16:35:55 UTC | BlinkingNora | Hmmm, not sure of the specific details. I'll be visiting next week so will be sure to take some photos to make edits when I'm next back on my PC. (Not sure what OSM editor is available on Android) | |
| 5 | 2018-01-12 16:38:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've heard people recommend https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vespucci as an Android editor, but not used it myself. | |
| 6 | 2018-01-12 16:39:31 UTC | BlinkingNora | My thanks! I'll be sure to check it out sometime :D | |
| 43617972 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-01-10 10:27:38 UTC | daveemtb | Hi, the path you marked as closed from Penally to the beach is (I believe) a public footpath that crosses a rifle range, and is temporarily closed when the path is in use. Your edit suggests it is permanently closed. Do you happen to know which is the case please? Thanks! |
| 2 | 2018-01-10 10:27:55 UTC | daveemtb | when the rifle range is in use, I mean! | |
| 3 | 2018-01-10 11:48:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing you mean http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102403267/history ? That runs through the golf course, not the rifle range. The signage (back in November 2016) did suggest permanent closure rather than "when the bullets are flying", but things maye have changed since then. At t... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-11 15:31:14 UTC | daveemtb | The County Council had confirmed by email that the footpath from Penally level crossing, past the firing range, across the golf course to the beach is currently open and passable, and isn't closed during use of the firing range. I'll mark it as open. | |
| 5 | 2018-01-11 15:32:18 UTC | daveemtb | Oh, and there was a problem with erosion following storms in 2014, which has now been addressed, perhaps that was the cause of the closed notice? | |
| 55198976 by ChrissW-R1 | 1 | 2018-01-09 09:24:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Could you explain what the source is here? "source=investigation" doesn't really explain anything...Best Regards,Andy |
| 22699454 by wilpin | 1 | 2018-01-06 18:01:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just wondered about the "embankment=yes" tag on the River Clyst http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285944892 . Is it "on an embankment" or does it "have embankments either side of it"? I'm currently trying to render the "embankment" tag for waterways. ... |
| 55156357 by Parrotias | 1 | 2018-01-04 13:17:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, you've change the name on node 232172609 as can be seen by http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=232172609 . Can you explain the reason for the change? |
| 2 | 2018-01-04 13:21:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oh - and welcome to OpenStreetMap!(I hadn't spotted that it was your first edit). | |
| 3 | 2018-01-05 08:33:24 UTC | Parrotias | Hello, According to the United Nation and international recognition, name of this place is Zangilan not Kovsakan. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-05 10:40:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's actually not particularly relevant what the United Nations think. See this OSMF policy document for information: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf "The OpenStreetMap community operates under the “on the ground” principle, recording... | |
| 5 | 2018-01-12 22:42:16 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55394689 where the changeset comment is: Revert implausible changes in Nagorno Karabakh. Attempt to contact the user failed. | |
| 55125835 by Legolash2oLiam | 1 | 2018-01-04 11:21:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just wondered if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316865419/history etc. was still "landuse=railway" if the Bevercotes branch is no longer in use?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-04 12:03:41 UTC | Legolash2oLiam | Sorry! I believe I made a mistake. I've hopefully fixed. I am adding it's speed limits, restrictions, etc... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-04 12:54:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. What's the licence for the NESA data?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2018-01-04 13:02:29 UTC | Legolash2oLiam | There are downloadable PDFs on the link below.https://www.networkrail.co.uk/industry-commercial-partners/information-operating-companies/national-electronic-sectional-appendix/Because NR are publicly funded are required to be open on most things. You can ask for an account and you should hav... | |
| 5 | 2018-01-04 13:05:32 UTC | Legolash2oLiam | An example is the just the London North Eastern from the Network Rail site. It's 1186 pages but contains exactly the same information on the on-line version.http://archive.nr.co.uk/browse%20documents/sectional%20appendix/sectional%20appendix%20full%20pdf%20copies/london%20north%20eastern%20sec... | |
| 6 | 2018-01-04 13:15:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Unfortunately I don't think that "are publicly funded are required to be open on most things" will be good enough. Also, https://www.networkrail.co.uk/terms-and-conditions/ seems to explicitly prohibit use here.What I'd suggest is that you contact them and obtain an explicit waiver or s... | |
| 7 | 2018-01-04 13:37:24 UTC | Legolash2oLiam | Yeah I knew that quote could back fire. I remember reading on the Network Rail website something similar. They don't however release information on equipment location (in case of theft). Hence why I had to do a FOI request.Which part of the text are you referring to when you say "explicitly... | |
| 8 | 2018-01-04 15:19:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | I said "explicitly prohibits" because the Ts and Cs of the website talked about "personal and noncommercial use", which wouldn't be good enough for OSM. Now obviously exactly which data that applies to is a different question, but you've already asked them now, which is great :)... | |
| 9 | 2018-01-12 09:35:22 UTC | Legolash2oLiam | Just putting this out there. I got a response back from Network Rail saying it's fine as long as we source the information.I've sent an exact quote to SomeoneElse just in case. | |
| 55159148 by Moovit Team | 1 | 2018-01-04 15:17:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just for info, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Turkey suggests that foot=yes is the default on trunk roads in Turkey. If you've got an app that doesn't work without that tag, you probably need to fix the app. |
| 55115524 by mboeringa | 1 | 2018-01-04 11:24:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi, What was broken here? I'm not suggesting that something wasn't, just asking what it was so that the problem doesn't happen again :)Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-04 11:34:51 UTC | mboeringa | Hi Andy, the Clipstone forest multipolygon had one inner that touched the outer over a considerable length. This is technically not allowed (and certainly not in international Simple Features GIS standard), and I am actually surprised it rendered at all and PostGIS / osm2pgsql managed to create some... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-04 11:56:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. What I've done elsewhere (but not yet here) for this sort of problem is to create a larger "landuse=forest" or "landuse=forestry" area, usually with a name, and smaller natural=wood areas within, usually with leaf_type and other info. Around here what is the "fores... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-06 17:11:55 UTC | SK53 | Hmm, OSM Multipolygons do not have to obey the GIS Standards & I believe explicitly do not. Dont have all refs to hand, but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Relation:multipolygon#Touching_inner_rings is a start | |
| 5 | 2018-01-06 18:29:54 UTC | mboeringa | Yes, I know, but ultimately, if you do want the data to display in the "Standard" style, you will unavoidably need to consider this to some extent: osm2pgsql fills the PostGIS render database of openstreetmap-carto, and that database essentially needs Simple Features, as that is what PostG... | |
| 6 | 2018-01-06 18:34:51 UTC | mboeringa | As I wrote before, I am actually still surprised the original multipolygon relation rendered at all in the Standard layer... | |
| 55104357 by BrainDigitalis | 1 | 2018-01-04 11:32:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I've changed Dog and Duck from an "amenity=pub" with a name of "... (closed)" to a "disused:amenity=pub" based on the change here - that should avoid people accidentally going to it thinking that it is still a pub!Best Regards,Andy |
| 17230416 by stevea | 1 | 2017-12-29 11:33:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Steve,Just wondering about the leisure=park tag on here - I'm not convinced that it really is a "leisure=park" in the laid-out-parkland sense that's described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park . I'll admit it's a few years since I've been here, but I'd be surpri... |
| 2 | 2017-12-30 00:32:18 UTC | stevea | It's a good question, Andy, and it's nice to text with you in near real-time (I am a fan of your edits, you are dedicated!).What you are asking is at an edge of history in OSM as a project: in this part of California circa 2008-2010, this is how large parks were imported into this part of Calif... | |
| 54845713 by BayMapper | 1 | 2017-12-28 19:19:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello BayMapper,I notice you've added back the "leisure=park" tag to MacKerricher State Park http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7603526/history .It's a while since I've been there, but I'm pretty sure really not a "park" in the "leisure=park" sense (for info see ... |
| 2 | 2017-12-28 20:59:56 UTC | BayMapper | Hello. Thank you for bringing that to my attention. Feel free to change the tag to MacKerricher if you like. I already made an agreement with another mapper to not edit that park any more and I definitely do not want to deal with that guy again.And I am trying to get in the habit of making more ... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-29 11:24:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I've changed it to a boundary=protected_area (though national_park also seems to be used for state parks round here too). One more question - what about Mount Diablo State Park https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/187121 ? That always struck me as being similar - an area of countryside s... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-30 22:37:01 UTC | BayMapper | I've thought about this too. There does not really seem to be any one way of tagging these sort of parks that 100% matches their description. Some choose to tag it as a national park, or a nature preserve, or as a regular park with national park or protected area boundary. To me it seems more or les... | |
| 49934762 by MacLondon | 1 | 2017-12-28 18:15:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi - just wondered about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4943307720 - is it a highway=crossing or an amenity=bicycle_parking? I'm guessing it can't be both (and it's a couple of years since I visited, so I can't help as to which, unfortunately).Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-28 22:02:17 UTC | MacLondon | Thanks Andy. I've corrected the error.Regards,Mac | |
| 54748676 by Adamant1 | 1 | 2017-12-27 12:44:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just to let you know, OSM's Data Working Group got a complaint about the duplication in this area (which you may also have seen mentioned in the talk-us post at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-December/018216.html ), so thank you for tiding up some of the problems here... |
| 53890435 by paulmach | 1 | 2017-12-27 12:43:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just to let you know, OSM's Data Working Group got a complaint about the duplication in this area (which you may also have seen mentioned in the talk-us post at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-December/018216.html ), so thank you for tiding up some of the problems here... |
| 2 | 2017-12-29 07:24:41 UTC | paulmach | Thank you. I made the edit because it came up on OSM Inspector. I don't usually edit land use, but can see it needs some attention. | |
| 53204783 by Paramida | 1 | 2017-12-25 01:23:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi, I'm guessing that "embarkment_type" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534838009 should perhaps be "embankment_type"?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-25 15:00:37 UTC | Paramida | Hello,Yes, thanks for pointing that out. Error has been corrected. Changed from "embarkment_type" to "embankment_type". Greetings | |
| 53598691 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-11-08 10:23:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | What actually is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/768300036 ? The tags on there don't seem to make a lot of sense. Maybe one of them was added by mistake (7 years ago!) - normally what I'd do with those is try and contact the original mapper to find out what it actually is.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-23 22:36:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any news on the best tagging for Crumhenge? | |
| 3 | 2017-12-23 22:43:36 UTC | nyuriks | http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/4951473#map=14/39.9009/-75.3555 -- hasn't responded. | |
| 54091997 by Ant Ko | 1 | 2017-12-23 22:12:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Ant Ko,If http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394338259/history is not an airport any more it should not be tagged as an airport in OSM.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 54572575 by willB0T | 1 | 2017-12-12 19:03:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello willB0T and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Generally speaking, you might find it easier to use a more gradual approach when changing large things such as residential areas (even if they quite a bit wrong). It makes it easier to fix just a corner of a problem, and still have a valid residential ar... |
| 2 | 2017-12-23 22:01:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello willB0T,I see the residential landuse for Newport hasn't reappeared yet. Do you need any help?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 54847684 by Miller Liu | 1 | 2017-12-23 21:10:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Miller Liu,Can you explain why you've repeatedly deleted the tree at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5290770860/history ? Someone added it 6 days ago, you deleted it, then someone restored it and you deleted it again.Also, a number of other mappers have been trying to get in touch with... |
| 2 | 2017-12-23 21:11:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | 你好，米勒劉，你能解釋一下為什麼你一再刪除了這個樹：https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5290770860/history？ 有人在6天前添加它，你刪除了它，然後有人恢復它，你又刪除了它。此外，還有其他一些製圖人員試圖與您取得聯繫（請... | |
| 54842506 by Rahimam | 1 | 2017-12-22 15:37:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain the change that you've made here? You've removed some language code values, can yu explain why?The changeset comment you've used is just "change" - that doesn't really explain what you've changed to what and why. Can you explain?Best Regards,Andy |
| 54781396 by Deepika2724 | 1 | 2017-12-21 00:07:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 50350359 by daveemtb | 1 | 2017-12-17 13:23:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just wondered what "highway=p" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4975309742 was?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-18 20:05:50 UTC | daveemtb | Good spot. Perhaps it was meant to be highway=passing place? There's a bug in the version of iD I was using where the text cursor jumps from the value box back to the key box after typing one or two characters. Could have resulted from that.If it looks like a passing place feel free to correct -... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-18 20:06:34 UTC | daveemtb | or rather passing_place | |
| 4 | 2017-12-18 20:23:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - it does look like a passing_place on the imagery, so I've changed it. | |
| 33539631 by mjessen_mdv | 1 | 2017-12-17 01:11:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've added "network=Nation Rail" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3711588220/history ; presumably this should be "National Rail". Isn't this also a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296406307/history ? |
| 54672993 by m6amiri | 1 | 2017-12-16 20:42:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!These buildings got added in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.I've deleted them now, but have you any idea how that might have happened?Best Regards,Andy |
| 54461544 by Matthieu Bessat | 1 | 2017-12-08 15:26:36 UTC | fantomas | Hello. You added objects to the ocean. Please, don't use OSM as sandbox. |
| 2 | 2017-12-16 20:23:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 3 | 2017-12-16 20:24:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Si vous voulez un serveur de test, peut-être que https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.orgfonctionnerait pour vous?Meilleures salutations,Andy | |
| 54452715 by Djoar | 1 | 2017-12-16 20:03:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea ho... |
| 54452705 by adiputra986 | 1 | 2017-12-16 20:02:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.Best Regards,Andy |
| 45252527 by dudone | 1 | 2017-12-15 11:09:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just spotted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466732976 - looks a bit long for a horse_stile? Also there's another just to the southeast. |
| 2 | 2017-12-15 19:42:35 UTC | dudone | Looks like JOSM's autocomplete has got the better of me. Corrected.RegardsDudley | |
| 3 | 2017-12-15 19:58:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! | |
| 49627648 by rowers2 | 1 | 2017-12-12 14:54:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello rowers2,This looks very much like a mechanical edit.Can you please explain what you were trying to do here and where you discussed it with the local community?Best Regards,Andy Townsend |
| 2 | 2017-12-15 17:59:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | (replying to an OSM PM that basically said "I was just using the JOSM validator")Hi rowers2,Please don't take all of the JOSM validator's suggestions at face value - you'll need to ask yourself if there are any other problems in an area and whether information would be lost by maki... | |
| 33868784 by dudone | 1 | 2017-12-14 12:58:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369596182#map=19/53.23763/-1.70266 really a stile? It looks like it's on a small road from the imagery suggesting perhaps gate or cattle grid? |
| 2 | 2017-12-14 20:02:47 UTC | dudone | Hi AndyI've changed it to gate.RegardsDudley | |
| 54579505 by BeachBumRetiree | 1 | 2017-12-12 23:48:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello BeachBumRetiree,Is there any reason why you changed the whole residential area here to a park? Maybe there are some "park" (or other green) bits and some "houses" bits?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-13 00:00:17 UTC | BeachBumRetiree | The neighborhood is spread out over a large area of land, with distinct residential areas interspersed with parks, woods, trails, tennis courts, green spaces, etc. Labeling the entire area "residential" overlooks this fact. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-13 00:08:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. In that case I'd actually split it up so that the "houses" bit is residential and and the other bits are tagged appropriately too (park/wood/forest/whatever). | |
| 4 | 2017-12-13 02:31:34 UTC | S-zation | But the fact that it is a housing development with woods, recreational areas, or grass dispersed throughout doesn't change that it is an area zoned for residential use. And all of the green spaces/tennis courts/trails/recreation areas are already mapped on top of it. It doesn't match the definitio... | |
| 54579850 by S-zation | 1 | 2017-12-12 23:34:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - you beat me to it (while I was upgrading perl over here!). |
| 38048271 by SK53 | 1 | 2017-12-12 18:51:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any idea what sort of barrier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405528505 is?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 21:10:22 UTC | SK53 | Wire fence (from photos), now added along with a lot of other features | |
| 3 | 2017-12-12 22:22:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! | |
| 4 | 2017-12-12 22:29:24 UTC | SK53 | More to be done. I dont think many field boundaries got added, all TS-C woods need severe tidying up etc. Lots of unmapped woodland towaards Lurgashall. | |
| 54574324 by S-zation | 1 | 2017-12-12 19:37:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just for info, I've blocked Darwin721 for a period of time - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1659 - for continually changing this residential area to a park. Are you OK fixing the problems here or do you need any help?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.... |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 19:46:56 UTC | S-zation | Hi there,Thank you for stopping the vandalism. I think I am ok with fixing the problems here. The biggest issue was the continual revert of the residential areas to parks. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-12 19:49:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | OK, thanks. We'll keep an eye open for edits by "known problem users" and keep an eye open for changes to the residential area. If you spot anything else iffy, drop a mail to data@osmfoundation.org .Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2017-12-12 20:30:27 UTC | S-zation | It looks like he is back on a new accounthttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/BayForestI can't revert all of the new changesets if he makes new accounts | |
| 5 | 2017-12-12 21:08:06 UTC | freebeer | Confirmed, you beat me to it.Back home from school.Off with the kid gloves, I suggest... | |
| 54511783 by StephenRD | 1 | 2017-12-12 19:10:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops, If you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53352807/history I think that something's gone wrong here - a small section of wall has been merged with lots of other ways to create something that is now tagged "fence; fence; wall; fence; fence; fence; fence; wall; fence; wall".Do... |
| 20644880 by SK53 | 1 | 2017-12-12 18:51:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any idea what sort of barrier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2679422663 is?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 21:24:11 UTC | SK53 | A wooden gate; fixed | |
| 44965506 by dudone | 1 | 2017-12-12 18:49:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464186215 perhaps a hedge?Cheers,Andy |
| 54567447 by Darwin723 | 1 | 2017-12-12 14:38:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Darwin723,I've blocked this account for the reasons described at http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1658 . Your previous account was told many times not to mistag residential areas as parks http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6310073 .Best Regards,Andy Towns... |
| 54562247 by andrewmci | 1 | 2017-12-12 11:56:37 UTC | Chris Fleming | again - I don't believe this to be a park. This has been mapped as woods for nearly 7 years and has been edited as such by several people. Have all the trees been cut down and this turned into a park? |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 13:02:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello andrewmci,Whilst we're grateful for new mappers in OSM including those who seem to have come via Pokemon Go, please don't change existing features to "parks", whether they be gardens or areas of trees. In OSM there are many tags to choose from; always pick the most appropriate. F... | |
| 54366258 by Darwin721 | 1 | 2017-12-07 09:32:15 UTC | S-zation | Why is a residential neighborhood marked as a park? And a construction zone in the neighborhood is marked as industrial? |
| 2 | 2017-12-11 03:30:00 UTC | Darwin721 | Because OSM Influences Nests and Blocked Spawns: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheSilphRoad/comments/6ujkkv/osm_query_for_map_features_used_in_pokemon_go/ | |
| 3 | 2017-12-11 23:12:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Darwin721,Please don't "make things up" in OSM in the hope that things will turn up in Pokemon Go. This won't actually work for a couple of reasons - one is that people in OSM will change it back (as has happened here) and another is that according to the people who actually look ... | |
| 52698563 by David Hardillier | 1 | 2017-12-11 22:29:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I noticed this cafe called "Unknown" http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5152874523/history while tidying up mapping by some students up north. It's also removed the name here, but I'll add it back if the name really is called "Unknown" here (as opposed to you just not k... |
| 54368549 by BlinkingNora | 1 | 2017-12-07 23:38:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello BlinkingNora, Here you've changed http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24807683 to a "park". It certainly doesn't look like a park from the available imagery - that suggests it's an arable field with tramlines in it that a crop sprayer can go up and down.Various people have been cha... |
| 54275673 by Penelope | 1 | 2017-12-06 16:51:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5260355269/history got added at latitude 0, longitude 0. I have removed it. |
| 54067904 by Abdelali BOUSSIB | 1 | 2017-12-06 16:34:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | As you can see by looking at http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=54067904 , something went wrong here. Were you trying to import some data? Presumably you did not intend to add it to the middle of the sea?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-06 16:35:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Comme vous pouvez le voir en regardant http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=54067904, quelque chose s'est mal passé ici. Étiez-vous en train d'importer des données? Vraisemblablement, vous n'aviez pas l'intention de l'ajouter au milieu de la mer?Meilleures salutation... | |
| 37697227 by EzekielT | 1 | 2016-03-09 11:32:29 UTC | wambacher | reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37705806 |
| 2 | 2016-03-09 18:36:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi EzekielT,People have contacted you several times in the past about invalid admin level changes (including me, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33275714 ).Whereas most things in OpenStreetMap are simply a matter of going and surveying something and then adding the results to OSM, wit... | |
| 3 | 2016-03-14 00:17:25 UTC | EzekielT | I have many sources: http://www.stabroeknews.com/2010/news/regional/10/09/netherlands-antilles-no-more/, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constituent_country, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aruba, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sint Maarten, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curacao (although you did say... | |
| 4 | 2016-03-14 00:37:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | One of the articles you quote says "Aruba is one of the four constituent countries that form the Kingdom of the Netherlands". http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2323309 is the admin level 2 relation; Curaçao http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1216719 is a subarea of that.As... | |
| 5 | 2016-03-14 15:28:41 UTC | EzekielT | That's a good idea. Okay. | |
| 6 | 2017-12-04 19:17:17 UTC | tbakhuis | Curacao is not NL as the Nominitem geocoder suggests.Currently a lot of addresses are displayed in OSM as Street, Willemstad, 0000AA, NL. This is not correct. Here in Curacao we don't have zip codes and the NL should be changed to CW. Since 10-10 2010 Curaçao is an autonomous Country that... | |
| 7 | 2017-12-04 19:25:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I've added a comment over at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=675663#p675663 (which is the forum where admin levels etc. are discussed). However, I'm not actually sure whether you're describing a problem with the data in OSM or with the Nominatim geocoder (Curaçao i... | |
| 8 | 2017-12-04 19:53:38 UTC | tbakhuis | It does sound strange when you see it like that but we never put NL (Netherlands) as country. I live in Curacao it just doesn't look right when we see Curacao, NL. Google's Geocoder has it right this time. Google Geocoder has Street, Willemstad, Curaçao | |
| 9 | 2017-12-05 08:49:08 UTC | wambacher | please read this answer at the forum: #######################Just for clarification:There is a 'Kingdom of the Netherlands' (plural intended) - or 'Koninkrijk der Nederlanden' (idem).Within this kingdom there are 4 autonomous countries:- the Netherlands (again, plural intended in Eng... | |
| 10 | 2017-12-05 16:44:54 UTC | EzekielT | That's what I knew all this time, but I guess all of you still didn't listen :). | |
| 11 | 2017-12-06 10:52:25 UTC | wambacher | Hi EzekielT. no easy stuff ;)see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=675929#p675929 | |
| 12 | 2017-12-06 20:52:13 UTC | EzekielT | Maybe we should tag all of them (Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Netherlands, Aruba, Sint Maarten, and Curaçao) as admin_level=2, as they're all officially countries! | |
| 13 | 2017-12-06 20:58:34 UTC | EzekielT | As in:Kingdom of the Netherlands (including the Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao, and Sint Maarten) -> admin_level=2Netherlands -> admin_level=2Curaçao -> admin_level=2.Aruba -> admin_level=2.Sint Maarten -> admin_level=2. | |
| 14 | 2017-12-07 03:15:43 UTC | tbakhuis | Seems correct to me. Indeed they're are all countries | |
| 54315308 by BlinkingNora | 1 | 2017-12-04 10:42:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello BlinkingNora and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Thanks for all your updates around Littlehampton. I just wondered about the change to this landuse though - it was "residential" before, and on the imagery it still looks fairly residential, is it really best described as commercial?Hope ... |
| 33003129 by SK53 | 1 | 2017-12-04 00:14:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | ... so there was I looking for wind turbines, and I found this one. It's the only "power:generator=wind", and there are various other ones in use: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=wind#values . |
| 54304724 by Paul Lockwood | 1 | 2017-12-03 19:06:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,It looks like that's already mapped as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165124356 .Best Regards,Andy |
| 30925352 by edy kurniawan | 1 | 2017-12-03 17:59:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Lots of buildings here have the same tags as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343819447 . Is that correct, or has it perhaps been copied to them all by mistake?Best Regards,Andy |
| 54296465 by Gwynfor | 1 | 2017-12-03 13:00:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | "disconnected highway" is because it isn't joined to the roads at either end. You can see that by looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544319672 - if it was joined at either end you'd see each end say "part of way ..." like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38499018 does... |
| 54261645 by Krital | 1 | 2017-12-02 23:16:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Krital,As previously mentioned in http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1618 , you're adding strange numbered points again, this time as "tourist attractions" Can you explain what they are?Best Regards,Andy |
| 54201839 by DeanChap | 1 | 2017-11-30 12:24:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can yo provide a little more detail about this change other than just "boundary corrections"? As I'm sure you're aware, a number of the boundaries here are disputed, and it'd be helpful to other mappers to explain what was wrong and what the change was in more detail.Best Regards,Andy... |
| 2 | 2017-12-01 07:16:17 UTC | wambacher | Hi Ivan,beside the fact, that this was a political motivated edit (Rep Srpska is NOT an internationally recognised country), you made some technical errors.changes have been reverted. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-03 21:40:12 UTC | michalfabik | Hi Ivan, you renamed the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina relation to "Herceg Bosna", why? I renamed it back to "Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine" as there is no recognised entity under the name of "Herceg Bosna". I'm quite certain that you know this very well. ... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-04 04:11:20 UTC | wambacher | @michal i tried to revert his changes, may be i missed that? | |
| 5 | 2017-12-04 07:00:20 UTC | michalfabik | Hi, yeah, it looks like it. I downloaded all three admin_level=4 relations that make up Bosnia and everything seemed fine, there was just this one glaring "error". It should be ok now. | |
| 54129400 by Ranger444 | 1 | 2017-11-29 19:32:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - have you checked this edit with the local community? http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44078077 suggests it's an actual deliberate name change.NPR suggests it's a valid change too. |
| 2 | 2017-11-29 19:38:07 UTC | Ranger444 | Wow, I had no idea they changed the name. Thought someone was messing with the data.I've reverted it | |
| 3 | 2017-11-29 19:44:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! | |
| 4 | 2017-11-29 19:46:30 UTC | Ranger444 | I thought the language was Russian... | |
| 5 | 2017-11-29 19:52:47 UTC | CinderBDT907 | https://www.facebook.com/COBarrow/photos/a.561904543975776.1073741828.560850137414550/886154371550790/?type=3&permPage=1 | |
| 6 | 2017-11-29 19:59:23 UTC | Ranger444 | Thanks Cinder, I looked at a few articles after SomeoneElse commented on the changeset and I changed it back... | |
| 5743176 by philippekerla | 1 | 2017-11-27 17:32:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I know that it was a long time ago, but in this changeset you've added the same river twice. Have a look athttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/905736932andhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/905751387and see alsohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/5734699https://www.openstreet... |
| 2 | 2017-11-27 17:33:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bonjour,Je sais que c'était il y a longtemps, mais dans ce changeset vous avez ajouté la même rivière deux fois. Jettes un coup d'oeil àhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/905736932ethttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/905751387et voir aussihttps://www.ope... | |
| 54115748 by dgitto | 1 | 2017-11-27 11:29:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks (the perils of cut and paste!) |
| 54109930 by Rexma423 | 1 | 2017-11-27 09:05:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I've removed the wikipedia tag you added here because the wikipedia page for an abstract concept ("null island") isn't relevant to a physical buoy floating in the ocean.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-11-28 01:57:04 UTC | Rexma423 | I would disagree with you but do whatever you want. | |
| 7985291 by brianboru | 1 | 2017-11-26 16:24:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Mind if I change https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1262117773 etc. to "information=route_marker" and then add them to the Heart of England Way relation?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-11-27 08:53:56 UTC | brianboru | No problem. Go ahead | |
| 51588921 by gethyn85 | 1 | 2017-11-26 15:14:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Looking at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=pillbox#values the most popular tagging seems to be "military=bunker" together with "bunker_type=pillbox". https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1916451008 is an example of it.Best Regards,Andy |
| 48103132 by Breekweg | 1 | 2017-11-09 11:49:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Not sure how it happened, but a node got added in the Pacific in this change: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4814186894/history :) |
| 2 | 2017-11-25 15:52:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've deleted it. | |
| 48268435 by MapperGuy | 1 | 2017-10-22 01:28:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you want to test stuff, there's a test site over at https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ that you can use.It's probably about time that these were changed back to houses... |
| 2 | 2017-11-25 15:52:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've changed them back. | |
| 52659024 by Paul Lockwood | 1 | 2017-11-25 15:02:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | HelloFrom the decription, it looks like http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5150025623 might actually be a brewery rather than just a bar. In order to add a brewery to OSM you'll need to use a different editor to MAPS.ME - it only allows the creation of basic points of interest. If you go to https... |
| 52145860 by lovenes | 1 | 2017-11-05 15:56:35 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you please have a look at these changes? You added some "highway=residential" to objects which should rather be buildings.Jan |
| 2 | 2017-11-25 14:24:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've reviewed these, changed the "buildings" to buildings and removed some that just looked like a bit of concrete had been swept. | |
| 54059703 by nabla_de | 1 | 2017-11-25 12:53:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello nabla_de,This is a very big changeset - it covers most of the planet. It is difficult for other mappers to see what changed with changesets that are so large. Can you explain what changes you were making in here and what the source was? The changeset comment is just "ways corrected&q... |
| 2 | 2017-11-25 12:54:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hallo nabla_de,Das ist ein sehr großer Changeset - er deckt den größten Teil des Planeten ab. Für andere Mapper ist es schwierig zu sehen, was sich bei so großen Changesets geändert hat. Kannst du erklären, welche Änderungen du hier vorgenommen hast und w... | |
| 49657349 by sltyu03 | 1 | 2017-11-25 11:58:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello sltyu03 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!If you're wondering what this email is about it's about some OpenStreetMap edits you did back in June (along with the rest of a class?). We're trying to get in touch with the person who was teaching the class so if you can remember who that was it'd be g... |
| 49658191 by jonathanlwe | 1 | 2017-11-25 11:57:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Jonathan and welcome to OpenStreetMap!If you're wondering what this email is about it's about some OpenStreetMap edits you did back in June (along with the rest of a class?). We're trying to get in touch with the person who was teaching the class so if you can remember who that was it'd be ... |
| 49658412 by GracesChing | 1 | 2017-11-25 11:56:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello GracesChing and welcome to OpenStreetMap!If you're wondering what this email is about it's about some OpenStreetMap edits you did back in June (along with the rest of a class?). We're trying to get in touch with the person who was teaching the class so if you can remember who that was it'd ... |
| 49657831 by Claudia Gee | 1 | 2017-11-25 11:55:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Claudia Gee and welcome to OpenStreetMap!If you're wondering what this email is about it's about some OpenStreetMap edits you did back in June (along with the rest of a class?). We're trying to get in touch with the person who was teaching the class so if you can remember who that was it'd ... |
| 49657718 by NJJ | 1 | 2017-11-25 11:53:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Ng Jin Jing and welcome to OpenStreetMap!If you're wondering what this email is about it's about some OpenStreetMap edits you did back in June (along with the rest of a class?). We're trying to get in touch with the person who was teaching the class so if you can remember who that was it'd ... |
| 54061973 by fredrike1 | 1 | 2017-11-25 01:01:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-11-25 01:03:57 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54062701 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test data including near null island | |
| 54009620 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-11-22 22:58:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | I don't think that the chemists in Clipstone was ever a hospital was it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541972384/history |
| 2 | 2017-11-23 07:33:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi SomeoneElse, the present tags were not from myself, a search shows the facility mapped to have actually been Clipstone Health Centre. If it's confirmed to not be now closed it ought to be tagged disused.Regards Bernard | |
| 3 | 2017-11-24 15:08:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Well (the chemists) was shut when I was there. It looks like a new mapper added the "hospital". They've only been mapping for a couple of days so I'll let them get their feet under the table before pinging them with questions :) | |
| 53944848 by observer | 1 | 2017-11-20 18:31:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Er no, not a "shop=beauty". Please don't mechanically edit things that are not simple typos. |
| 2 | 2017-11-21 07:04:28 UTC | observer | Can you please explain why you invent tags for yourself with capitals, add a 'shop' without address, website or what so ever and then start to complain about so-called mechanical edits? My tagging is according to the wiki and the rules that are set out in there and I find your behaviour quite worryi... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-24 00:38:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Can you please explain why you > invent tags for yourself with capitals ...No, "shop=tanning" - the "T" was just a typo.> ... add a 'shop' without address, > website or what so ever...When I walked past it was dark. Funnily enough the website (if there is... | |
| 4 | 2017-11-24 08:10:50 UTC | observer | The fix was not made because of a typing error but because the tagging scheme seemed inappropriate to me. I tried to do a good thing and I am still flabbbergasted about the reaction. | |
| 5 | 2017-11-24 09:35:40 UTC | observer | The 'normal' tagging scheme is shop=beauty and beauty=tanning. If this is expressed like shop=tanning than this can only mean that the tanning is unrelated to beauty. If this is not what the mapper intended than it is a mistake to tag it in that way. I just tried to help the mapper. | |
| 6 | 2017-11-24 09:42:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for trying to help, but maybe the best way to find out what the mapper intended is to actually ask them? In this case "tanning" is on page 13 of 860 of https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/shop#values - it's far from a "long tail" value (and there's nothing wrong with &... | |
| 7 | 2017-11-24 15:24:52 UTC | observer | I understand what you say but it only takes away the fun of contributing to osm. Also I dind't expect to get involved in such a long discussion over something that looks like a minor detail to me. And I really don't understand the purpose of so many different tags that mean the same. And if they don... | |
| 8 | 2017-11-27 10:48:49 UTC | observer | "maybe the best way to find out what the mapper intended is to actually ask them?"The name is "The Tanning Room" and the type was "Tanning." There was no reason to doubt the intention.Whenever I add data to OSM it is no longer my data. Anyone can change it, add... | |
| 46824603 by FvGordon | 1 | 2017-11-23 23:39:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Unfortunately it looks like you "corrected" self intersections in some Pokemon doodles here :) |
| 51837748 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-11-19 09:21:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | The wikidata entry for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255467667 looks wrong to me. The link is to the wikidata entry for the character, not to the statue itself. |
| 2 | 2017-11-20 20:59:17 UTC | nyuriks | Agree. This is part of the wp/wd -> subject:wp/wd, or artist:*, or several other ones. Specifically for the fictional characters, most likely its a subject. I have made a task for this - please click "save" on it if you agree.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Link_Improve... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-20 22:56:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Er - I've no idea why you're saying 'please click "save" on it if you agree'. If you've added a wikidata tag in error (as appears to be the case here) just remove it. There is no need to have "made a task for this". | |
| 53930341 by Max-- | 1 | 2017-11-20 18:40:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - have you actually surveyed these? Some have been changed from abandoned to razed; some from dismantled from abandoned. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229069543/history for example has a note on it saying that that nothing's visible from the path; are you now saying that something... |
| 2 | 2017-11-20 18:45:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also, from memory, aren't bits of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16521029/history visible (as openings onto the tunnel) from the street? | |
| 3 | 2017-11-20 18:50:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Is the path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99777062/history designated as a public footpath for the whole length? Is any stretch beyond it if any is designated? There was/is a fixme node at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1153360498 . | |
| 53929921 by ForstEK | 1 | 2017-11-19 20:08:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Thanks for deleting the "Sri Lankan buildings" in the middle of the Atlantic. As well as those though the Atlas buoy http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900/history also got deleted. I've undeleted it.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-11-19 20:08:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Здравствуйте,Спасибо, что удалили «здания Шри-Ланки» в середине Атлантики. Как и те, которые, несмотря на то, что Atlas buoy http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900/history также удал... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-19 22:12:01 UTC | ForstEK | Sorry, didn't know about this point. Thanks for fix, i'll be more careful :) | |
| 53918652 by amindanavy | 1 | 2017-11-19 20:05:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I think that something went a bit wrong here - it looks like you added some buildings in the middle ot the Atlantic here.Someone's deleted them now.Best Regards,Andy |
| 53881333 by 3vivekb | 1 | 2017-11-18 11:09:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for adding these. I had no idea there was a crossing across the 680 entry ramp at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541384478 - don't think I'd fancy trying it in the dark! |
| 53397135 by Moovit Team | 1 | 2017-11-05 13:27:16 UTC | zstadler | Hi,In this edit you have created several issue by moving nodes belonging to ways in the Weizzman Institute.For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53397135 was distorted because https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/909597094 was moved..https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5114682... |
| 2 | 2017-11-07 07:54:55 UTC | SafwatHalaby | Moovit Team seem to never respond to changeset comments. Are they a single person or a generic account? | |
| 3 | 2017-11-07 07:57:51 UTC | SafwatHalaby | For the record: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=1190212 | |
| 4 | 2017-11-07 08:01:30 UTC | SafwatHalaby | I've sent them a PM, in case that catches their attention. | |
| 5 | 2017-11-07 13:25:42 UTC | zstadler | I've sent the following e-mail to the OSM Data Working Group:.Hello DWG members,.Over the last 3 years 13 changesets created by Moovit Team have been discussed with a total of 16 comments regarding potential mapping errors. The Moovit Team did not respond to any of them..We would appreci... | |
| 6 | 2017-11-08 17:48:55 UTC | SafwatHalaby | The DWG have soft-blocked Moovit Team, until they read this message: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1620 | |
| 7 | 2017-11-08 17:52:10 UTC | SafwatHalaby | I suspect they've already introduced many weird access tags that were uncaught by our QA. | |
| 8 | 2017-11-16 15:12:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Safwat The change at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53842443 suggests that "Moovit Team" might actually be reacting to comments, even if they're not replying in changeset discussions.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 9 | 2017-11-16 20:56:25 UTC | SafwatHalaby | No, that's a generic description I've seen earlier too. And the post-block permissions still look weird and out of place with the normal way we tag footways or paths. The soft block had no effect whatsoever on behavior or communication as of now. | |
| 10 | 2017-11-16 20:57:14 UTC | SafwatHalaby | For instance, this is totally confusing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53842919 , why not just use highway=footway? | |
| 11 | 2017-11-16 20:59:42 UTC | SafwatHalaby | Specifically, this way was edited after the block: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541053309 | |
| 12 | 2017-11-16 21:06:33 UTC | SafwatHalaby | I sent the following "support request" from their site, in case they're somehow missing this:.Hello, your OpenStreetMap editing account, "Moovit Team", is not behaving according to community standards. Since 2014, several users asked questions about many different edits, and ... | |
| 13 | 2017-11-19 11:55:12 UTC | Moovit Team | Thank you for your comments.Up until now, we did not received updates regarding discussion about our edits. In the following days we will check your comments and reply accordingly. Thanks for your understanding,Moovit Team. | |
| 14 | 2017-11-21 12:19:11 UTC | Moovit Team | Hi Zeev,Thank you for the detailed comments.In this changes set i tried to change the name of the street and verify that the permissions are correct.If i make change in the graphic line you are more than welcome to reverse my changes.Sorry if the change I made caused you problems. | |
| 15 | 2017-11-21 13:22:02 UTC | zstadler | Hello Moovit Team,Thank you for responding to the comments..If I understand you correctly, you have modified the geometry of ways and location of nodes when you wanted just to change their tags..IMO, it is an unreasonable conduct for a mapper with more than 1000 edits. | |
| 53792861 by lancelot1984ddp | 1 | 2017-11-16 10:54:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap,You've tagged http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537394875/history with a name of "non exsist boundary". Is this country boundary not in the correct place, and if not where should it be?Best Regards,Andy |
| 53808849 by myrik260138_111 | 1 | 2017-11-16 00:19:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 53741964 by tambunhamdika | 1 | 2017-11-13 18:47:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - it looks like you added the "learnosm" test data to OSM by accident here. It's not your fault - there's supposed to be a flag in that to prevent that happening :) |
| 53741955 by Rio Aria Nugraha | 1 | 2017-11-13 18:46:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - it looks like you added the "learnosm" test data to OSM by accident here. It's not your fault - there's supposed to be a flag in that to prevent that happening :) |
| 53726016 by 3vivekb_sjsidewalks_import | 1 | 2017-11-13 01:08:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,As has been pointed out on the "imports" mailing list a number of times over the last month or so, there are still problems with newly-added sidewalks not actually joining to anything. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540087287 is an example in this changeset.Back in September ... |
| 2 | 2017-11-13 05:06:17 UTC | 3vivekb | Hi Andy. I'm the project leader. I'll reply to your email on the imports list shortly. | |
| 53726749 by Nickelodeous | 1 | 2017-11-13 00:58:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!There seems to be a bit of a problem with at least one of the sidewalks added here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540095721 doesn't actually connect to anything else. Without connections, nothing that consumes OSM data will be able to do anything useful w... |
| 52485012 by SK53 | 1 | 2017-11-12 22:02:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've never been there, but can't believe that "wreck" makes sense here? |
| 2 | 2017-11-12 22:35:13 UTC | SK53 | I dont either & sound mirror isnt spelt correctly. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-12 22:39:47 UTC | SK53 | Looks like it was mentor tag-fiddling http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24464842, but I now seem to have changed it to fix (wtf !?) | |
| 53348284 by dudone | 1 | 2017-11-12 21:31:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that the spelling of "Mandale Enginer House" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5198601990 is possibly a typo? |
| 2 | 2017-11-13 16:51:56 UTC | dudone | Corrected to "Engine". ThanksDudley | |
| 33490352 by OrangutanClyde | 1 | 2017-11-12 18:22:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | The signage I've seen is at the north of the rec ground that has the football goals on it. The cricket ground just has signage for "Farnsfield Cricket Club". If you know someone that has better information then please update it - someone who lives there is far more likely to know than ... |
| 53707797 by prof Lindicus03 | 1 | 2017-11-12 10:07:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "piste_type=yes" (with no other tags) on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539965621 is supposed to indicate?Best Regards,Andy |
| 19944601 by radmar | 1 | 2017-11-11 20:42:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I now that this was a long time ago, but I think that something went wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256251796, historic is set to "{'ruins': 1}".Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-11-11 20:43:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Cześć,To było dawno temu, ale myślę, że coś poszło nie tak z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256251796, historia jest ustawiona na "{'ruins': 1}".Z poważaniem,Andy | |
| 51813812 by Yorvik Prestigitator | 1 | 2017-11-11 17:08:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Not sure exactly what happened, but http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522140839 was set as construction. That way was created here, but likely split from something else. I've removed the construction tag, but I suspect that it belongs on a subarea somewhere.Cheers,Andy |
| 39288590 by Atangana Jacques Landry | 1 | 2017-11-10 11:50:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/417842657/history seems occupy the same site as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400012874 . Do you know which one is correct? |
| 2 | 2017-11-10 11:51:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bonjour, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/417842657/history semble occuper le même site que http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400012874. Savez-vous lequel est correct? | |
| 53608433 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-11-09 11:50:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've said here "Fix self intersection of area outline.". Could you explain what the problem actually was? |
| 2 | 2017-11-09 12:10:51 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi The changeset shows that one node (5215244108, v2) was removed from way (256223532, v4). If you temporarily revert the changeset you can easily see what changes have been made. The removed node was at the north east of the landuse=farmland area where it borders the wood, here :- https://osm.org/g... | |
| 46600328 by shuhada sukor | 1 | 2017-11-09 11:40:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, something's gone a bit wrong here. You've added something in the middle of the Indian ocean https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4718693707/history and a number of other empty nodes and a shelter in a car park? |
| 6961415 by user_5359 | 1 | 2017-11-09 11:35:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1102481393/history as it presumably doesn't exist in that location :) |
| 53619691 by Zews_93 | 1 | 2017-11-09 11:17:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - it looks like you added the "learnosm" test data to OSM by accident here. It's not your fault - there's supposed to be a flag in that to prevent that happening :) |
| 53622899 by ڕاستی | 1 | 2017-11-08 23:17:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've changed "name" here from "name:ar" to "name:ckb". Obviously (as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kirkuk_%282017%29#Aftermath ) the situation on the ground is changing by the day and very much in a state of flux. Can you please explain your re... |
| 53285628 by zchitoshi | 1 | 2017-10-27 13:22:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello ans welcome to OpenStreetMap!You've used "Akros Global Health" as a source on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536038468 - what is "Akros Global Health"?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-29 13:07:40 UTC | Nakaner | @SomeoneElse: See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53285199 | |
| 3 | 2017-10-29 13:09:56 UTC | Nakaner | @SomeoneElse: Seems to be an organized "import". I found another user (OSMCha filtering for changesets with more than 8000 additions): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53282724 | |
| 4 | 2017-11-05 04:47:22 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia. An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordin... | |
| 5 | 2017-11-07 21:01:44 UTC | Nakaner | @SomeoneElse Was it intended to only revert parts of the "import"? Parts of the mess still exist (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535616453#map=19/-14.54914/30.88742) and further changesets have been uploaded today.Let me know if you need someone who runs complex_revert.pl for you. I... | |
| 6 | 2017-11-07 21:16:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | @nakaner yes, I deliberately only reverted the zch* changesets so far (after trying to contact them about it and receiving no response for a week). I'm aware of more problems, but the other Akros mappers made fewet mistakes. You'll notice that I've commented on changesets of each of them where ther... | |
| 53579176 by messanagos | 1 | 2017-11-07 15:51:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, I've undeleted the Atlas buoy at latitude 0, longitude https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900/history#map=6/3.217/0.945 which was (presumably accidentally) in this changeset.Also, it would really help other mappers if you used meaningful changeset comments. "#Benin #Mono #Com&e... |
| 2 | 2017-11-07 15:53:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bonjour, j'ai remodelé la bouée Atlas à la latitude 0, longitude https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900/history#map=6/3.217/0.945 qui était (probablement accidentellement) dans ce changeset.En outre, cela aiderait vraiment les autres mappeurs si vous utilisiez de... | |
| 52867263 by sbootsma | 1 | 2017-11-07 12:21:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello sbootsma and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Something seems to have gone wrong with one of the roads in this change: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468933242/history#map=19/26.18926/88.36955if you look at the history at the left you can see that lots of nodes got incorporated twice. Any... |
| 2 | 2017-11-07 12:21:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hallo sbootsma en welkom bij OpenStreetMap!Er is iets misgegaan met een van de wegen in deze wijziging:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468933242/history#map=19/26.18926/88.36955als je naar de geschiedenis aan de linkerkant kijkt, zie je dat veel knooppunten tweemaal zijn opgenomen. Enig i... | |
| 53499077 by thetornado76 | 1 | 2017-11-06 21:02:26 UTC | chillly | This looks like an undiscussed mechanical edit. You MUST discuss edits like this before you make them and get broad agreement in the area, GB in this case.You MUST not assume the wiki is correct. |
| 2 | 2017-11-07 04:16:17 UTC | thetornado76 | No, this was not a mechanical edit. I had only change same never accepted tags and sometime misspell e.g. "amenity=Health Centre" changed to the accepted healthcare=centreI know the wiki ist correct. Therefore I had changed this. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-07 09:31:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173985450/history you haven't "changed" anything, you've just removed one tag. One of the reasons why mechanical edits such as this one should be discussed is that someone might be consuming that tag. It's highly unlikely that anyone would object to a... | |
| 4 | 2017-11-07 13:33:39 UTC | thetornado76 | In this case I had deleted this tag, because it was double - healthcare is the accepted tag.I think it is not helpful, to add a new or a own useless medical tag, when there is a accepted tag.I will not remove more useless medical tags | |
| 5 | 2017-11-07 16:10:30 UTC | SK53 | It is a highly dubious statement that "healthcare is the accepted tag". Certainly in the UK medical facilities are much more likely to be mapped using the amenity key. The various healthcare tagging schemas advocated on the wiki have never received much mainstream support from mappers, by ... | |
| 6 | 2017-11-07 16:32:41 UTC | thetornado76 | This is correct. Amenity=doctors is the most accepted tag for healthcare Worldwide. But I don't want to change it from centre to doctor. Because the tag which I had changed was medical_centre. Therefore I used the healthcare tag.If you want you can also add amenity doctors. | |
| 53564782 by kyleantis | 1 | 2017-11-07 01:34:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - I think you've uploaded the "learnosm" test data into the middle of the Atlantic. Don't worry - I'll delete it. |
| 53566946 by mdavenport1985 | 1 | 2017-11-06 23:24:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,In this changeset you've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538844018 which is an almost exact duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538716681 added just 11 hours previously.As I said in http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1616 , please take a little more care as you're ad... |
| 51504874 by Atamaadam | 1 | 2017-11-06 23:11:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, and welcome to OSM!You've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5063928804/history as a "highway=motorway_junction" called "Motor way". This seems unlikely in the location that you've added it. What was it that you were trying to add? Maybe there's a better way of d... |
| 53403412 by Duncan John | 1 | 2017-10-31 22:20:45 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | Why have you moved Monkton Road Pharmacy from its correct location to Healey Grove? |
| 2 | 2017-11-06 20:31:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info - I've moved Monkton Road Pharmacy back to Monkton Road (accidental node drag I guess). Currently looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53378694 . | |
| 3 | 2017-11-06 20:37:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | OK, that's now done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53565633 . Elm Park Way is now back in the land of the living :) | |
| 52470841 by smb1001 | 1 | 2017-10-29 00:15:53 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi, are Clare Bank and Dere Street alternative names for the same road? If so, name should be set to one of them and alt_name to the other. Can you please review?Thanks,Mike |
| 2 | 2017-10-31 14:22:32 UTC | smb1001 | I've had a look at other sources and relabelled the route from Whittonstall to Ebchester. Dere Street is the name of the Roman Road so only applies to the parts that intersect with the road. Chare Bank is the official name in Ebchester, but I can't see if it extends beyond the bridge. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-06 10:24:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | So should e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4045056 be renamed back to Chare Bank? It's a few years since I drove up there, but I don't remember seeing any Dere Street signage (though it's memorable as a "long and straight road").Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2017-11-06 10:42:20 UTC | smb1001 | The Ordnance Survey only lists the name Chare Bank in Ebchester itself - well before it reaches the bridge. It then lists B6309 after that. In addition it gives the name as Fine Lane when it turns north temporarily. On the straight part from there to Whittonstall it calls it Dere Street and B6309. A... | |
| 51509558 by Mike Baggaley | 1 | 2017-11-02 17:46:58 UTC | SK53 | So you are also the person silently removing my bridge=footbridge tags too. Can you at the very least ask about these before changing them. |
| 2 | 2017-11-02 17:54:25 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Apologies for inadvertently failing to add a comment on the occasional change. If a way has highway=footway and bridge=yes then we know it is a footbridge. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-06 10:17:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Mike,Changing "bridge=<value>" to "bridge=yes" removes descriptive information from OSM. Please don't do it. Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. | |
| 53541589 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-11-06 07:02:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Follow-on from http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53501753 (which hit 10k objects) |
| 53541570 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-11-06 07:02:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Follow-on from http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53501753 (which hit 10k objects) |
| 53541341 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-11-06 07:02:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Follow-on from http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53501753 (which hit 10k objects) |
| 53525537 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-11-05 17:09:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Follow-on from http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53501753 (which hit 10k objects) |
| 53525242 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-11-05 17:09:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Follow-on from http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53501753 (which hit 10k objects) |
| 53524842 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-11-05 17:09:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Follow-on from http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53501753 (which hit 10k objects) |
| 53521329 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-11-05 11:25:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Follow-on from http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53501753 (which hit 10k objects) |
| 53515003 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-11-05 09:24:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Follow-on from http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53501753 (which hit 10k objects) |
| 53520315 by mdavenport1985 | 1 | 2017-11-05 09:04:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello mdavenport1985,There are at least a couple of problems with this changeset - http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5211700721/history appears to be a duplicate node of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4445118202/history . Also there seems to be nothing in the Bing imagery to suggest that the u... |
| 53515048 by mdavenport1985 | 1 | 2017-11-04 23:15:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi, not sure how it happened but http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5211235151/history is a "duplicate node" of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2326986287/history which was created 4 years ago. Assuming these streets actually join, they should share nodes, and you can move fro one to t... |
| 53504391 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-11-04 22:02:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Follow-on from http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53501753 (which hit 10k objects) |
| 53503198 by mdavenport1985 | 1 | 2017-11-04 13:18:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello mdavenport1985,As previously mentioned, I think that you're still "overinterpreting" aerial imagery somewhat. For example, I don't believe that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538277195 is all building (note that there's no defined shadow to the south) whereas http://www.openstre... |
| 50120476 by Seandebasti | 1 | 2017-11-04 11:49:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4957653990 best described as a tourism=information? I presume that it's not actually accessible, being sat on the White House roof - presumably I'd attract a fair bit of attention if I tried to go up there.It sounds like it's something more like a man_ma... |
| 53418470 by Mike Baggaley | 1 | 2017-11-02 09:19:07 UTC | will_p | Hi Mike,I object to the change you have made here. You have changed bridge=chain to bridge=yes. How has the data been improved by this? You appear to only be stripping out information. I don't believe there is any consensus that bridges must only be tagged with bridge=yes. bridge=chain identifie... |
| 2 | 2017-11-02 09:26:25 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi Will, the reason for doing this is that bridge=chain is not rendered as a bridge by OSM, and is not included in the list of approved values. The bridge has a note on it saying it is a chain so no information has been lost.Regards,Mike | |
| 3 | 2017-11-02 13:37:22 UTC | Richard | note= tags aren't machine-readable - so in practice, moving things from a machine-readable tag to a note means that they are practically lost to all consumers.At the very least, this should have been moved to bridge:structure= rather than a note= .There is no "list of approved values&qu... | |
| 4 | 2017-11-02 13:39:46 UTC | SK53 | On the contrary information has been lost: changing a tag to a note is always information loss. You are changing tagging for the renderer, a practice which has been discouraged for many years. Instead you should a) file an issue with the rendering github repository and b) improve the wiki documentat... | |
| 5 | 2017-11-02 13:43:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | To be honest, as there's no highway or railway over it I'd add the "man_made=bridge" object (as a closed way) if possible.It'd donkey's years since I've been to the Priest House though, so my memory isn't up to it. | |
| 6 | 2017-11-02 15:56:09 UTC | Mike Baggaley | The difficulty with having an indeterminate set of bridge values is that it is impossible to determine which of the unusual values are actually bridges. For example, there were quite a few bridge=culvert tags which on examination mostly turned out to be waterways below roads and should not have had ... | |
| 7 | 2017-11-02 17:37:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | > The difficulty with having an indeterminate set of bridge values is that it is impossible to determine which of the unusual values are actually bridges.Speaking as someone who's done that, no it isn't:https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L506 | |
| 8 | 2017-11-02 17:46:02 UTC | Mike Baggaley | >Speaking as someone who's done that, no it isn't:What you have actually done there is build your list of 'approved' values :) | |
| 9 | 2017-11-02 17:50:24 UTC | Richard | > it is impossible to determine which of the unusual values are actually bridgesThat's a genuine issue, but one which would be better fixed by removing the not-actually-a-bridge values than by removing the actually-a-bridge values. ;) | |
| 10 | 2017-11-02 17:53:59 UTC | SK53 | No, he's built a list of values which he finds useful. One of the main points of OSM is to allow the description of the unusual & idiosyncratic because a rigid list of approved values inevitably cannot cope. People enforcing a set of values devalues what OSM is about. For instance you have chang... | |
| 11 | 2017-11-03 12:27:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes - what SK53 has said is correct. It's probably clearer to look at some of the other examples in the same file (barriers, shops, offices). For example, depending on the application it might make sense to render or otherwise process a cycle_barrier the same as a motorcycle_barrier or it absolute... | |
| 53476388 by pshdar | 1 | 2017-11-03 12:15:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please be aware that there are two nodes here - one for the town http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/599019138 and one for the province http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2914855220 . You've just changed the province one to place=town. Please be careful, especially when editing with OsmAnd (w... |
| 53471883 by ڕاستی | 1 | 2017-11-03 10:29:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,"fixed wrong name and added info" doesn't really explain what you changed here or why. If you'd said "changed name from version with '/' in it to the same as name:ckb, which is by far the most common used language here" that would explain things better to everyone. |
| 53224070 by Frazzy | 1 | 2017-11-02 23:14:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535073780 overlaps http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423968288 that was added a year ago.Best Regards,Andy |
| 53264649 by harcher | 1 | 2017-11-02 23:11:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535616453 overlaps http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426382206 that was added a year ago. There are some other similar overlaps nearby.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-11-20 07:32:48 UTC | harcher | Good afternoon.Could you please let me know which areas were reverted so I can look into them?Thank you,Helena | |
| 53283139 by zchitoshi | 1 | 2017-10-27 13:30:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535984314 appears to be a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494011885 that was added 5 months agoCan you stop adding stuff for a while until we can sort out how to avoid these duplicates?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-11-02 23:09:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535984187overlapshttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531282011 . | |
| 3 | 2017-11-05 04:47:14 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia. An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordin... | |
| 50379675 by Silencialschirwa | 1 | 2017-11-02 22:59:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508436188 overlaps http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407586677 .Presumably something went wrong when you were uploading it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 50301516 by snmkandawire | 1 | 2017-11-02 22:56:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, building http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507733122 overlaps http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507403088 .Presumably something went wrong with the upload?Best Regards,Andy |
| 53282724 by harcher | 1 | 2017-10-29 13:08:57 UTC | Nakaner | Hi harcher,this and your previous changesets seem to be an import. When was this import discussed on the international Imports mailing list? Where is this import documented at the OSM wiki?Imports must comply with the Import Guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines).... |
| 2 | 2017-10-30 10:05:04 UTC | harcher | Good morning,Although it's large amount of data, it's not an import in the sense referred to in the Wiki. We had a team of enumerators drawing houses in QGIS using DigitalGlobe images, and are uploading that information in batches. It was preferably logistically to do in QGIS for data cleaning and... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-01 20:36:23 UTC | Nakaner | Hi Helena,thank you for your response. Could you please provide the license agreement between Digital Globe and you which explicitly allows you to upload traced features to OpenStreetMap?If you edit OSM, you must not user sources we are not explicitly allowed to use.Best regardsMicha... | |
| 4 | 2017-11-02 06:04:55 UTC | harcher | Good morning Michael,I can look into this, but the DigitalGlobe Standard images available via JOSM are already match the features we have drawn? That is, we could have created the same shapefile in OSM as it's the same source.Warmly,Helena | |
| 5 | 2017-11-02 22:37:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | @harcher "batches are also cleaned against existing OSM data before uploading to prevent duplication and overlap (i.e., areas with previously drawn structures). "This hasn't happened in a number of places, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53283139 . I commented there 7 da... | |
| 6 | 2017-11-07 21:02:34 UTC | Nakaner | Hi Helena,the features you uploaded today do not match any of the imagery we are allowed to use (example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539035317). In addition, nobody from your team proved that you have the permission to use imagery from "DigitalGlobe EV Webhosting". The lack of a... | |
| 7 | 2017-11-07 21:36:52 UTC | harcher | Good evening,If you could provide me an email address or other means to upload files, I would be happy to share with you a screenshot that shows where the shapefiles align with DigitalGlobe Premium Images available in JOSM for Siavonga. Additional structures may be drawn in, but this is likely due... | |
| 8 | 2017-11-07 21:44:17 UTC | Nakaner | Hi Helena,you can either upload the agreement to the OSM wiki or send it to ahfogoo2xugohj4iy2li@michreichert.de (the email address is a temporary alias and will be deleted in a few weeks for spam protection).Best regardsMichael | |
| 9 | 2017-11-08 18:58:10 UTC | Nakaner | Hi Helena,thank you for sending me the email. I will have a look on it and forward it to SomeoneElse.Best regardsMichael | |
| 53437889 by crvcarvalho | 1 | 2017-11-02 22:09:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 53428366 by wisniemj | 1 | 2017-11-02 22:09:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 53430564 by RyGee | 1 | 2017-11-01 19:59:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Thanks for tidying these up!Cheers,Andy |
| 52945082 by Krital | 1 | 2017-11-01 14:34:16 UTC | andi9876 | Dear, please stop add viewpoints, remeber it´s visible for everybody! |
| 2 | 2017-11-01 14:50:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Krital and Welcome to OpenStreetMap!You may not be aware, but when you edit OpenStreetMap you're editing a map that everyone can see, not just your personal copy. Please do continue editing, but please do only add things that are verifiable on the ground. If you want to add a personal bookma... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-01 14:54:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | ជំរាបសួរលោក Krital និងសូមស្វាគមន៍មកកាន់ OpenStreetMap!អ្នកប្រហែលជាមិនដឹងទេប៉ុន្តែនៅពេលដែលអ្នកកែសម្រួល OpenStreetMap អ្នកកំពុ... | |
| 51490857 by Hannah Pan | 1 | 2017-10-31 15:15:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Did you create http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/3765 and http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/3766 ? If so, you might want to have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53348097 and the mailing list thread at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-October/079378.html .B... |
| 53397889 by Aboudrar Said | 1 | 2017-10-31 15:09:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I think you might be overinterpretating the imagery a bit here. I can't see any source for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537176988#map=19/25.35680/-12.04784 in any of the available imagery and at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5202318119/history it looks like the wall goes north, not eas... |
| 53348097 by mdavenport1985 | 1 | 2017-10-31 14:51:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Looking at some of the changes here such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536717413 I think you may be "overinterpreting" the imagery somewhat. If you look at the different imagery choices available you can get a feeling for the scale quite while,... |
| 53179219 by geozeisig | 1 | 2017-10-31 13:12:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Your changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530914953/history suggest that this is simply a mechanical edit made without engaging your brain. Clearly the mapper there has misunderstood how to map amenities; you have now made the map suggest that the entire pier area is a toliet. |
| 2 | 2017-11-17 18:23:51 UTC | Polarbear | @geozeisig, this is exactly what I was trying to explain in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53295049 - your mechanical edits are covering underlying problems. And you do not even fix your errors when being pointed to. You just jump to another tag for a mechanical edit. Fixed harbour ->... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-18 10:28:18 UTC | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53896411 where the changeset comment is: revert mechanical edits by geozeisig | |
| 53253773 by geozeisig | 1 | 2017-10-26 15:44:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Here you appear to have changed a number of "shop=pharmacy" to "amenity=pharmacy".Are you sure that that is appropriate in all cases rather than e.g. "shop=chemist"?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-27 08:00:43 UTC | geozeisig | "shop=pharmacy" is rejected, so we should use "amenity=pharmacy" instead.Best Regards,Dieter | |
| 3 | 2017-10-31 13:10:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | I didn't say "shop=pharmacy", I said "shop=chemist". I've reverted this. Local mappers will be able to pick up the correct tagging in each case. | |
| 4 | 2017-11-18 10:28:16 UTC | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53896411 where the changeset comment is: revert mechanical edits by geozeisig | |
| 53254287 by geozeisig | 1 | 2017-10-31 12:48:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've used a comment here of "PossibleSynonym", but I think you need to explain a bit more about why you've deleted a couple of the things here.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-11-02 13:41:49 UTC | Polarbear | Hi geozeisig (deutsch auf Anfrage), in your effort to change market->marketplace,1.in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76200283 you deleted a pedestrian area (which appears to be too large according to current Bing, but did you check locally that the buildings are still there and not demol... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-18 10:28:17 UTC | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53896411 where the changeset comment is: revert mechanical edits by geozeisig | |
| 53390471 by guilanyà | 1 | 2017-10-31 11:37:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Please don't fight edit wars in OSM over political disputes.http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=45382981Where there are disputes, the OSMF rules are set out at http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf . Specifically, the "on the ground rule" a... |
| 2 | 2017-10-31 11:38:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | No lluiteu contra les guerres d'edició a OSM per disputes polítiques.Http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=45382981Quan hi ha disputes, les regles OSMF es detallen a http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf. Concretament, s'aplica la regla &q... | |
| 53371779 by Duncan John | 1 | 2017-10-30 19:35:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!In order for things using OpenStreet data to understand that the thing that you've added is a bus stop you'll want to tell it that it's a bus stop (other than just having the name "Bus Stop"). In the editor that you're using, if you click on the point... |
| 50102947 by Ghybu | 1 | 2017-10-29 11:19:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Does the deletion of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505783410/history and the other edits around http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/39.8654/43.6789 (you'll need to edit the area; many ways have no tags) look OK to you?I'm asking because you edited there previously.The mapper who de... |
| 2 | 2017-10-29 11:19:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bonjour,Est-ce que la suppression de http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505783410/history et les autres modifications autourhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/39.8654/43.6789 (vous aurez besoin de modifier la zone, de nombreuses façons n'ont pas de balises) vous semble OK?Je demande par... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-03 23:37:41 UTC | Ghybu | Hello,Unfortunately, he continues to give bad informations...Thank you for your vigilanceGhybu | |
| 53337366 by fatih sadak | 1 | 2017-10-29 11:15:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello fatih sadak,Can you explain what http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536616877 is please? It has no tags on it and doesn't match anything in the imagery.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-29 11:16:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Merhaba fatih sadak,Http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536616877 neyle ilgili lütfen açıklayabilir misiniz? Üzerinde etiketi yok ve görüntüdeki hiçbir şeyle eşleşmiyor.Saygılarımla,Andy | |
| 46172235 by SmokedSkull | 1 | 2017-10-26 14:51:53 UTC | neuhausr | Hi, I noticed you created these walking paths as one long line. Instead of doing this and creating overlapping paths, you should create smaller lines that connect to each other at nodes. Thanks for mapping! |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 17:28:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi SmokedSkull,Welcome to OpenStreetMap!Please don't reply like that to someone who's trying to help you - everyone understands that it can be difficult to get the hang of things at first, which is why the comment above was added. They're trying to help, not to criticise.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 3 | 2017-10-28 08:47:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | (for info I've hidden the comments above that caused my comment) | |
| 4 | 2017-10-28 22:03:48 UTC | SmokedSkull | Lick my nutsack | |
| 53283079 by jancymauri1994 | 1 | 2017-10-27 13:34:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I don't think that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535979294 is a motorway! Did you tag it as that by mistake?Best Regards,Andy |
| 53255612 by saboorkhan123 | 1 | 2017-10-26 14:56:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello saboorkhan123,Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535486835/history is really a secondary road?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 18:26:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | හෙලෝ සෝවර්කෝන්123,Https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535486835/history යනු ද්විතීයික මාර්ගයක්දැයි ඔබට විශ්වාසද?සුභ පතමින්,ඇන්ඩි | |
| 53255517 by saru1234 | 1 | 2017-10-26 14:42:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap!Unfortunately, we've had to undo this change - it added some things in the middle of the sea that obviously don't exist.Please can you ask who is in charge of "#missingmap_eastern_University" to get in touch with OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group ple... |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 18:25:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | OpenStreetMap වෙත සාදරයෙන් පිළිගනිමු!අවාසනාවකට මෙන්, මෙම වෙනස අහෝසි කිරීමට සිදු විය. එය පැහැදිලිවම නොපවතින මුහුද මැද සමහ... | |
| 53255494 by jancymauri1994 | 1 | 2017-10-26 14:36:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Unfortunately we've had to undo this change - you'd added a number of features to northern Canada that don't actually exist (large buildings, drawn lines etc.).Please can you ask who is in charge of "#missingmap_eastern_University" to get in touch wit... |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 18:25:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | ආයුබෝවන්! OpenStreetMap වෙත ඔබව සාදරයෙන් පිළිගනිමු!අවාසනාවකට අපි මෙම වෙනස අහෝසි කළ යුතුව තිබුණි - උතුරු කැනඩාවට ඇත්ත වශයෙ... | |
| 53258234 by shibani93 | 1 | 2017-10-26 14:29:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!,Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535524941 really a one-way primary motorroad?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 18:25:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | ආයුබෝවන්! Welcome to OpenStreetMap !, ආයුබෝවන්! Https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535524941 ඇත්ත වශයෙන්ම එක් මාර්ගයක් ප්රාථමික මෝටර් මාර්ගයක්ද? සුභ පතමි... | |
| 53255526 by saboorkhan123 | 1 | 2017-10-26 14:12:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello saboorkhan123 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Unfortunately, something went very wrong here - a whole town got moved 100km to the east. Please don't do anything in OpenStreetMap for a couple of hours until we've sorted things out.Once that's happened, can you ask who is in charge of "#m... |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 18:24:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello saboorkhan123 සහ OpenStreetMap වෙත ඔබව සාදරයෙන් පිළිගනිමු!අවාසනාවකට, යමක් මෙතැන වැරදියි - මුළු නගරයම කිලෝමීටර් 100 ක් නැඟෙනහිර දෙස... | |
| 53268098 by ndioufy | 1 | 2017-10-26 18:22:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I'm not sure how it happened, but some data got added in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean here.I've deleted it.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 18:23:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap!Je ne sais pas comment c'est arrivé, mais certaines données ont été ajoutées à l'océan Atlantique ici.Je l'ai supprimé.Meilleures salutations,Andy | |
| 53255481 by Suthakaran | 1 | 2017-10-26 14:48:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Suthakaran,There seems to be a problem with a number of the "#missingmap_eastern_university" and other related changesets by new mappers. Some of them have been adding large doodles - maybe they didn't realise that they were adding data to the live server? Also a new mapper moved ... |
| 53178936 by geozeisig | 1 | 2017-10-24 19:37:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398397867/history is better described as a hotel than a resort? |
| 2 | 2017-10-25 07:14:02 UTC | geozeisig | Ok resort is correct in this place. But you should add the buildings with tourism=hotel. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-18 10:28:16 UTC | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53896411 where the changeset comment is: revert mechanical edits by geozeisig | |
| 53132365 by kkrawczyk | 1 | 2017-10-24 11:35:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | "source=Knowledge" means you've personally surveyed all of these, presumably? :) |
| 2 | 2017-10-24 11:39:49 UTC | kkrawczyk | No - knowledge about tagging "pharmacy". If you check the history, you will notice that I changed tag shop=pharmacy to amenity=pharmacy | |
| 3 | 2017-10-24 13:48:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | How do you know that these items should have been tagged as "amenity=pharmacy" rather than "shop=chemist" (a perfectly valid but slightly different OSM tag)?This is one reason among several why it's a good idea to discuss mechanical edits before doing them, as discussed in http... | |
| 53124586 by Владимир К | 1 | 2017-10-21 11:48:05 UTC | woodpeck | Hello Владимир, against my warning you have reverted my changeset 53114647 instead of waiting for me to repair the problems. Now you are responsible for creating things like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384176165 and several 1000 other SEO entries in OpenStreetMap. Will you continu... |
| 2 | 2017-10-23 21:32:31 UTC | woodpeck | I see that you're making edits again; would you kindly comment on my question above? Do you intend to do anything about the SEO entries that you have re-added to OSM in this changeset? | |
| 3 | 2017-10-24 06:32:31 UTC | Владимир К | I didn't see any SEO entries. All POIs I saw are quite correct | |
| 4 | 2017-10-24 11:48:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4744899123/history just looks residential to me. Are you sure that there's actually a furniture shop located there? If it's a "work from home" business, and there's nothing visible on the street, then it shouldn't really be in OSM. Also, you've left th... | |
| 5 | 2017-10-24 12:37:03 UTC | woodpeck | The changeset contains a ton of nodes that are meaningless in OSM because they lack a POI type, but that carry advertising messages like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529863394 - or look at the way I pointed to in my comment above (a highway with a spammy description added), or click o... | |
| 6 | 2017-10-24 12:58:48 UTC | Владимир К | @SomeoneElsehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4744899123 has website and address on it is same as on the node.Anyway, I don't see there SEO or something else, you should delete node.@woodpeck What do you want? revert my revert? You deleted valid buildings, highway, nodes. Do you want others... | |
| 7 | 2017-10-24 13:01:43 UTC | Владимир К | all I see are some invalid tags on some of these POI. They should be fixed, not deleted | |
| 8 | 2017-12-22 08:18:20 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Are you aware that you added spam in this edit? | |
| 9 | 2017-12-22 08:19:29 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | "I didn't see any SEO entries. All POIs I saw are quite correct"So you made automatic edit without proper checks. Great. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302768566/history had for example name set to "When you donate your vehicle to Breast Cancer Car Donations, the proceeds f... | |
| 10 | 2017-12-22 08:20:28 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | The same for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511823420 and other. | |
| 11 | 2017-12-23 08:36:17 UTC | Владимир К | yep, but firstly i reverted the huge autoatic edit without proper checks, In comments for reverted changeset i posted examples, there the hole buildings with adress was deleted! also your examples of roads was copletely deleted! not spam tag, but the whole way! Are your seriously defend such edits??... | |
| 52145782 by carlosz22 | 1 | 2017-09-19 04:22:03 UTC | SafwatHalaby | Those image and "dataset" links are very strange. Mind explaining? |
| 2 | 2017-09-19 04:27:08 UTC | SafwatHalaby | It appears those lead to sensor data. Perhaps the "image" tag should be renamed to "website" or some new tag. "image" is for images. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-12 06:24:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | @SafwatHalaby for info since there was no response here (possibly de to broken email) I sent a "message that has to be read" http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1564 . | |
| 4 | 2017-10-14 14:48:32 UTC | carlosz22 | Hello.This is not an import. We are working on a network of photometers and we are including them like any other meteorology station, it's a station for monitoring the sky brightness.I used the tag image for image of the measures, maybe this is not correct, but I didn't find any other tag more e... | |
| 5 | 2017-10-14 14:49:18 UTC | carlosz22 | And sorry, I don't respond to the previous messages because I din't see them. | |
| 6 | 2017-10-17 06:18:40 UTC | SafwatHalaby | I think you should be using "website" rather than "image". But let's wait for @SomeoneElse's reply. He knows better. | |
| 7 | 2017-10-17 06:33:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | @carlosz22 it still looks like an import to me - talking about the tags to be used before adding a large number of objects to OSM is one of the main steps set out at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines . I'd suggest that you follow those now (even if the discussion is after the in... | |
| 8 | 2017-10-21 17:20:10 UTC | carlosz22 | Ok, I remove the tag image, no problem.But it's not an import like it defined on the Wiki. | |
| 9 | 2017-10-21 17:25:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Maybe you're reading a different wiki to me, but where did this data come from? Did you personally create it, either by by survey or by interpretation of imagery? Or did it come from some other source? | |
| 10 | 2017-10-21 17:35:12 UTC | SafwatHalaby | What would the right tag be? It's not image, and website is already occupied. | |
| 11 | 2017-10-21 18:31:43 UTC | carlosz22 | I work in a project called Stars4All and one of the parts of the project is develop a network of photometers and include them in OpenStreetMap, the photometers are monitoring stations. All the data follows ODBL and it's totally open. | |
| 12 | 2017-10-21 18:34:44 UTC | carlosz22 | And I'm the coordinator of the spread of photometers, so all the positions are from knowledge and survey. | |
| 53127025 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-10-21 12:36:30 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52610327, 52610406, 52610426, 52610526, 52610598, 52610647, 52610703, 52610758, 52610797, 52610831, 52610880, 52610951, 52610981, 52611017, 52611043, 52611135, 52611950, 52612086, 52612150, 52612191, 52612273, 52612337, 52612396, 52612420, ... |
| 2 | 2017-10-21 13:03:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | The reason why this is larger than just NSW is that changesets such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52640146 has a source of http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/ which was reverted here. | |
| 53052369 by ChrissW-R1 | 1 | 2017-10-18 21:00:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5024812100 isn't just drive-by spam? Also the equivalent node in LA? The London address looks fake for a couple of reasons - it's in Denmark Street, which is basically musical instrument shops and a few bars (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wik... |
| 2 | 2017-10-18 21:12:19 UTC | ChrissW-R1 | Yes, I had looked this address at Google Street View and can't see something about a shop like this. I think it could be only an online shop.But I don't want to remove it. Who knows, it could exist... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-18 23:21:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you think any of these might be valid, maybe try and contact the previous mappers? | |
| 48258464 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-04-29 17:50:30 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 47946345, 47947047, 47947482, 47978416, 47980692, 48002126. |
| 2 | 2017-10-18 07:45:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, sorry to say there's a small anomaly at, Way: 184967148 a stream tagged as a bridge crossing Way: 488314032 a track tagged as a bridge. Ther's also a short section of duplicated track.As I see you're doing several reverts I thought it best to let you know this problem.Regards Bernard | |
| 3 | 2017-10-18 10:22:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Re http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184967148 , if you're familiar with the area then by all means fix it. If not, it'll clearly show up as a QA issue and someone who is familiar with the area will be able to fix it.Unfortunately I haven't been walking that side of Keswick (other than just around... | |
| 52970975 by velmyshanovnyi | 1 | 2017-10-16 07:51:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You still are not using meaningful changeset comments. We know what "Hydrology" means, but it does not explain the process you are using.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2017-10-16 21:34:55 UTC | velmyshanovnyi | What would you write for this set?I have no imagination | |
| 3 | 2017-10-17 06:37:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'd explain the process that you're going through to add the data. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments has some ideas. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-17 18:59:56 UTC | velmyshanovnyi | thnx | |
| 52744292 by ڕاستی | 1 | 2017-10-16 14:16:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | For information, I've re-added a lot of the language codes that you had previously removed from Lirkuk. If there are any problems, please contact data@osmfoundation.org .This has been mentioned before, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1459 . |
| 52817169 by johanemilsson | 1 | 2017-10-15 10:01:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello johanemilsson,This is geographically a very large change with no comment explaining what was changed. Can you explain what you were changing and why?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-16 12:52:36 UTC | johanemilsson | Hi Andy,It sure is a large area. I forgot to add comment but it should be some like "Embassies missing representing country #maproulette-2791". Feel free to pitch in if you have any interest in foreign missions and some spare time :)/Johan | |
| 3 | 2017-10-16 13:12:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that all the locations are correct? Many in the list seem to have been created by MAPS.ME users, who tend to use lesser-used tags (such as "embassy") to create personal markers. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4697076691/history in particular seems odd; it was previously t... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-16 13:25:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info:https://github.com/maproulette/maproulette2/issues/348 | |
| 5 | 2017-10-17 06:24:40 UTC | johanemilsson | Thanks for raising this issue! Will need to review my latest embassy edits. | |
| 52968804 by Rexma423 | 1 | 2017-10-15 23:34:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Rexma423, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!The change that you've made here covers quite a large geographical area and that makes it difficult for people in one area to see just the things that affect them in their area. If you put different edits in different areas in different changesets then... |
| 2 | 2017-10-15 23:43:42 UTC | Rexma423 | Sorry about that, next time i'll be more specific. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-16 07:28:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks | |
| 4 | 2018-04-11 23:17:55 UTC | Rexma423 | You're welcome SomeoneElse. | |
| 52973037 by Salaamlogari | 1 | 2017-10-16 07:27:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Salaamlogari,I think that this got saved accidentally - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532878906/history just seems like a doodle.I've removed it.Best Regards,Andy |
| 52968756 by velmyshanovnyi | 1 | 2017-10-15 23:23:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello velmyshanovnyi,All of your recent changesets just have the changeset comment "#hidrology". Can you please start to use sensible changeset comments that describe the change that you made and what the source was (it doesn't appear to be Bing here, despite the tag). |
| 2 | 2017-10-16 00:07:19 UTC | velmyshanovnyi | server_api = bingserver_name = Bingserver_url = http://dev.virtualearth.net/REST/v1/Imagery/Metadata/Aerial?include=ImageryProviders&output=xml&key=Arzdiw4nlOJzRwOz__qailc8NiR31Tt51dN2D7cm57NrnceZnCpgOkmJhNpGoppU | |
| 3 | 2017-10-16 00:08:12 UTC | velmyshanovnyi | Copyright © 2017 Microsoft and its suppliers. All rights reserved. This API cannot be accessed and the content and any results may not be used, reproduced or transmitted in any manner without express written permission from Microsoft Corporation. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-16 00:12:28 UTC | velmyshanovnyi | HelloI'm waiting for your apologies for blocking.... )))) | |
| 5 | 2017-10-16 00:16:04 UTC | velmyshanovnyi | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HydrologyHydrology subdivides into surface water hydrology, groundwater hydrology (hydrogeology), and marine hydrology. Domains of hydrology include hydrometeorology, surface hydrology, hydrogeology, drainage-basin management and water quality, where water plays the c... | |
| 6 | 2017-10-16 08:13:05 UTC | Nakaner | The wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments explains what good changeset comments are and you are expected to use good changeset comments. | |
| 52967290 by Yusefkaramanli | 1 | 2017-10-15 22:16:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | This change, unlike the others by this account, actually seems plausible! |
| 52956974 by ChrissW-R1 | 1 | 2017-10-15 18:43:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Whilst I can understand why you've merged the wikipedia links of the NK region node into one, are you sure that (a) the content of the pages was actually the same and (b) the content of the one that you're now linking to (the AZ one) is neutral enough to be acceptable to the locals, who see themselv... |
| 46947543 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-10-15 12:14:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | It would help if you used English instead of saying things like "for auto-detected data problems, like disambigs and lists". Not everyone is familiar with wikibabble. |
| 30115838 by erichardwick36 | 1 | 2017-10-15 12:11:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Should http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=98200263 be called the River Severn still? It had its name removed in this changeset - just wondering why.Best Regards,Andy |
| 52917545 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-10-14 12:40:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Which was the duplicate way that got removed here? |
| 52566221 by Jay May | 1 | 2017-10-02 17:25:24 UTC | yaugenka | Jay May, my changes did not delete the previous data, whereas your reverting messed everthing up! There are now duplicate data. If you are doing reverting, do it wisely! |
| 2 | 2017-10-02 17:51:43 UTC | yaugenka | I do not mind if you put the previous "name:* values but please be kind to correct the mess and restore the new values I added. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-03 16:48:12 UTC | Jay May | The values you added were wrong. The only thing called „Hudahaj” is the train station. Those villages are called „Stancyja Hudahaj” and „Maly Hudahaj” respectively. Why should I restore wrong data if I’ve been there a couple of times, the latest of which was... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-03 17:33:39 UTC | yaugenka | Read this document from the district's government website:http://ostrovets.grodno-region.by/uploads/files/000225_408421__selskij_ispolnitelnyj_komitet.docI moved the values from "name" tags into "alt_name" tags and put names from the document into the "name" tags.... | |
| 5 | 2017-10-04 09:10:07 UTC | Jay May | Your threat of reporting the above to the DWG is absolutely ridiculous given the fact you are the one who has been reverting my changes without/before even asking why I made them, and thus you brought more confusion. Your behavior is contrary to the good practice of OSM, which pretty much puts your ... | |
| 6 | 2017-10-04 12:41:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Er - I'm confused...That document appears to be a document in Russian listing some village and settlement names in Russian. It merely confirms that these places have Russian names (which no-one disagrees with) as well as Belarusian names (which in this region I'm sure no-one disagrees with either... | |
| 7 | 2017-10-04 17:51:28 UTC | yaugenka | @SomeoneElse, that is exactly the case which we were explaning to everyone in defence of Russian names in the "name" tags - almost all offical documents and maps are in Russian language.This document is on the govenment website, govenment exacutive authority of the Ostivetskiy disctrict ... | |
| 8 | 2017-10-04 18:57:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | @yaugenka As I said, no one doubts that these places have BE and RU names. What I was asking about was your change of e.g. http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=1286803731 to lose the "Станция" part of the name (regardless of language). Separately to that, from looking at htt... | |
| 9 | 2017-10-04 19:33:21 UTC | yaugenka | @SomeoneElse, I'm not argueing about the use of the languigies right now. I just explained that regardless of that the document is in Russian it is an official one.The official name of the both settlesments is "Гудогай" without the "Малый" and "Станция&q... | |
| 10 | 2017-10-04 20:02:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's perfectly possible for 2 settlements (with different names) to be part of one larger admin area - I live in a place exactly like that myself. | |
| 11 | 2017-10-04 20:15:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also - on the "official languages" point, there are many places in OSM where the "official" language isn't the one used by people and on signs locally, and as per http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf it's the language used by people and o... | |
| 12 | 2017-10-04 20:41:06 UTC | yaugenka | Sorry, I do not quite understand why we are discussing the use of language here. How is it related to the difference between "Станция Гудогай" and "Гудогай". | |
| 13 | 2017-10-04 21:07:25 UTC | yaugenka | You can also look up the names in the official registry of settlements at http://maps.by/searchateHere is a screenshot from therehttps://www.awesomescreenshot.com/image/2866539/17f558f07c38fa35fd106b9e0650c342 | |
| 14 | 2017-10-04 21:22:17 UTC | yaugenka | If we talk just about the use of these names, then try to search for "Станция Гудогай" or "Малый Гудогай" on the web and you will get "п. Гудогай" and "д. Гудогай" instead, like on this wiki pagehttps://ru.wikipedia.... | |
| 15 | 2017-10-05 11:16:56 UTC | Jay May | If the values are wrong, I still don't see what I should keep them as they were. I've corrected many mistakes on OSM where the ending was not the proper one or the name was wrong (just as in this case). I haven't seen districts of one locality signed whatsoever. For instance, Bialkiški use... | |
| 16 | 2017-10-05 17:31:44 UTC | yaugenka | I'm greatfull for your contributions but mapping settlements from signs is not enough. The reality is constantly changing. Some settlements get annexed by larger ones or become independent or are renamed or cease to exist at all. And road signs are always going behind these changes.For example, Bi... | |
| 17 | 2017-10-05 18:23:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | > So one must always double check it > with the official registry.I can't comment about Belarus directly but "What people refer to a place and how they classify it" and "how something is treated officially" are often very different in OSM. In most places the former get... | |
| 18 | 2017-10-05 19:13:21 UTC | yaugenka | There is not a single settlement with "admin" tag in Belarus. All settlements are mapped with "place" tag and correspond to official registry. The prority of mapping for us is actually the law, then the registry and then the signs. Because first comes an official act (e.g. about ... | |
| 19 | 2017-10-06 06:24:36 UTC | Jay May | Bialkiški was marked as a neighborhood by myself :)There is one thing I noticed in Belarus (very similar to Lithuania and to Ireland): ZIP codes seem not to be used ... Maybe it would be good to find them and map them? | |
| 20 | 2017-10-06 07:42:37 UTC | yaugenka | Bialkiški was marked as a neighborhood by myself :) xm.. the history says it differenthttp://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=6910214http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=242995527 | |
| 21 | 2017-10-06 08:19:14 UTC | Jay May | Ah, rightttt. Looks like this Georgij also knows about this.However, I am the one who created the relation between Bialkiški and Astraviec. You are welcome to have a look if I did it the right way. | |
| 22 | 2017-10-06 16:22:39 UTC | yaugenka | Not quite. It would be correct if the area of Bialkiški was outside Astraviec. Astraviec would then consist of two separate polygons like in this examplehttp://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1996913.But Bialkiški is within Astraviec, i.e. one polygon is within another and this will... | |
| 23 | 2017-10-07 20:20:52 UTC | yaugenka | I have fixed the alt_name*s of Гудогай by myself and submitted a request to our state authority to provide the name of the official act according to which the names were officially changed. | |
| 24 | 2017-10-09 11:12:01 UTC | Jay May | O.K. To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised they are not even aware that those 2 villages have slightly different names ... I'm pretty confident their answer will be very interesting to read. | |
| 25 | 2017-10-13 16:13:10 UTC | yaugenka | Here is there answerhttps://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bwqmq6xk-oieRzJfRThiUWNaOURLY3Q3SXFfRW82ZGJEVXUwThey say that the addressing system (which includes the registry) was formally launched in 2012 and the villages have always been named in the registry as "п. Гудогай" and &quo... | |
| 26 | 2017-10-13 18:49:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | However, the law doesn't affect how we generally map stuff in OSM - it's what's on the ground that matters.Don't just take my word for it, either - here's an answer to a similar question elsewhere: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-October/017990.html . | |
| 27 | 2017-10-13 19:10:11 UTC | yaugenka | I understand the on the ground rule and do not insist on changing the name right now but they may and are likely to correct the sign soon. Is anyone going to travel there from time to time to track the change for the map to stay up to date? | |
| 28 | 2017-10-13 19:30:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Is anyone going to travel there from time to time to track the change for the map to stay up to date?To be honest, it's how I keep stuff up to date where I live. Obviously (as Canadians on OSM lists point out regularly) that's less applicable to places with a significantly lower population d... | |
| 29 | 2017-10-13 19:58:47 UTC | Jay May | I will be there in a week or two.About what you mentioned above on the ground rule regarding India: English has been chosen despite being a minority language because it is a language that is displayed in every roadsign, no matter the language of the province. Same for Ireland or the non-Brussels b... | |
| 30 | 2017-10-13 20:33:54 UTC | yaugenka | Imagine your need to make a business trip to this village and got a ticke to "п. Гудогай" - that is the name which is used in all documents and on the web. So you search for that name on the map but don't find any because on the map it is named "Станция Гудогай&q... | |
| 31 | 2017-10-14 10:38:54 UTC | Jay May | ...and then they arrive on-spot and see „Станцыя Гудагай” written in Belarusian, which makes them really wonder what exactly is wrong with those names ... Neither the language, neither the full name correspond. „Что сделать...” | |
| 32 | 2017-10-14 11:24:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info, there's a widely-used tag for the "official name" of places: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/official_name . | |
| 33 | 2017-10-14 11:37:39 UTC | yaugenka | What is the sense of introducing one extra tag when 99.99% of names correspond to official ones and the remaing 0.01% is a \tneglect of the authorities who did not change the sign properly? | |
| 34 | 2017-10-14 11:40:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Feel free to corretc me with actual numbers, but my impression so far is that a _very high percentage_ of names in OSM in BE don't match the names on the signs. One of the arguments put forward was that they are official names. | |
| 35 | 2017-10-14 11:43:44 UTC | yaugenka | >my impression so far is that a _very high percentage_ of names in OSM in BE don't match the names on the signs.Can you give some examples apart from "Гудогай" where the names mismatch? | |
| 36 | 2017-10-14 11:55:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Well, the DWG was sent lots of photographs of roadsigns and placenames in BE that in OSM are mapped in RU. | |
| 37 | 2017-10-14 12:16:46 UTC | yaugenka | We are not talking about the use of languages here, are we? This discussion is only about the correspondence of signs to official names. Both russian and belarusian names are official. | |
| 38 | 2017-10-16 05:53:16 UTC | Jay May | I wouldn't say "What is the sense of introducing one extra tag when 99.99% of names correspond to official ones". Given the number of wrong names I corrected on the Belarusian soil, I would say up to 80% of the names do correspond .Let alone the language question - many times the name in R... | |
| 39 | 2017-10-16 07:59:48 UTC | yaugenka | >I would say up to 80% of the names do correspondPlease provide examples of the 20%. | |
| 40 | 2017-10-16 11:50:19 UTC | Jay May | I've changed so many of them that now I won't remember everything :) Those Belarusian toponyms I had to change were mainly names with "-ызна" finishing with "-ына" in reality and the other way round (a lot of them), Янава called Янова officially (and other such n... | |
| 41 | 2017-10-16 17:03:18 UTC | yaugenka | >Янава called Янова officially.The first one is in Belarusian the second one is in Russaion. So you are mixing languauges here.>names with "-ызна" finishing with "-ына" in realityProvide exact examples please.>Валейкішкі on roadsigns / ... | |
| 52718951 by ChrissW-R1 | 1 | 2017-10-07 22:35:01 UTC | ChrissW-R1 | Partial reversion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51305204 |
| 2 | 2017-10-14 09:33:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info, the last time there was a discussion about this the comments included https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-August/019125.html . It's going to get broken again (it's too big to manage effectively, as noted in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-August/0... | |
| 52911363 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-10-14 01:40:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Unfortunately, wikidata generally speaking isn't a valid source for OSM - it's mostly just copied from wikipedia which has an licence that is incompatible with OSM.It's unclear how wikidata was used here, however, since there's no wiki* tag on this node.Regardless of that, any "tagfiddling&... |
| 2 | 2017-10-14 01:43:17 UTC | nyuriks | SomeoneElse, I think you are fixated. What is this has to do with Wikidata? I lived in St. Petersburg | |
| 3 | 2017-10-14 01:53:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | "created_by=OSM+Wikidata 0.1" | |
| 4 | 2017-10-14 02:08:59 UTC | nyuriks | and? That's the tool name. | |
| 5 | 2017-10-14 08:30:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've added no source for the data and used a "created_by" tag that looks like it might be a source. That's why I said "It's unclear how wikidata was used here" (please do actually read the comments that people make).It may be that you live locally and believe that the curren... | |
| 52889496 by Alan Bragg | 1 | 2017-10-13 18:43:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I think that this change might have included rather more objects than anticipated (including some not previously edited by andygol), such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420984991/historyBest Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-13 19:09:05 UTC | Alan Bragg | Thanks for your comment. I'll verify all the changes. This one was not by andygol but has the same problem and needs area=yes. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-13 19:32:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | There were also examples such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374923973/history which were previously mapped as area:highway. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-13 19:49:39 UTC | Alan Bragg | Yes, that one is ok. This area:highway=pedestrian or footway all seem to have cropped up in 2015. I was wondering why they did not render and got an answer from scai https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/60067/why-are-some-pedestrian-areas-not-rendering I'm attempting to fix the problems in the ... | |
| 5 | 2017-10-13 20:19:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | For completeness (and apologies if I'm stating the bleeding the obvious here), an "area:highway" is fundamentally different to a "highway; area=yes". Usually it won't make sense to change either the latter to the former or the former to the latter. There is at least one rendere... | |
| 6 | 2017-10-13 20:42:47 UTC | Alan Bragg | Yes, thanks, I do understand. andygol had changed all highway=pedestrian area=yes to area:highway=pedestrian which caused all plaza type areas in the USA to become black holes in the map. I've been following this note "Note on area=yesDon't use area:highway=* for plazas and similiar features.... | |
| 52903289 by user_5359 | 1 | 2017-10-13 18:45:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for this!Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-10-13 22:29:57 UTC | freebeer | Pity that these reverts don't seem to have lasted long.(Kids these days. Why, when I was young...)(me wonders what the highest revision number is in OSM and if this is an attempt to top that) | |
| 52875775 by Prinny Em | 1 | 2017-10-13 05:37:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap,Please don't add fake data to OSM (there isn't an embassy on the M1 just north of the Derby Road bridge - people would have noticed it).By all means please add things that aren't currently mapped and really do exist - but don't make things up.Best Regards,A... |
| 52858569 by Abdelali BOUSSIB | 1 | 2017-10-12 16:01:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Er, what? This is in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. |
| 2 | 2017-10-12 16:02:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Ce changement est dans l'océan Atlantique. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-12 23:26:01 UTC | Abdelali BOUSSIB | Il y aurait sûrement un changement de coordonnés merci pour votre attention | |
| 52772630 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2017-10-12 13:58:56 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Hello SomeoneElse. Athttp://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5157855483http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5157855481http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5157855484you have created the new lifecycle-prefix `broken`. Could it also be `demolished`?http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished: |
| 2 | 2017-10-12 14:52:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | No, it's not demolished, it's just broken. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-12 14:55:07 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Ok. ;-)https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=brokenhttps://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=damaged | |
| 43560787 by Art School Restaurant | 1 | 2017-10-12 12:09:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Currently the "Art School Restaurant" is in the middle of a road - presumably that's not really where it is? |
| 2 | 2017-10-12 12:22:29 UTC | Art School Restaurant | It is just to the right of the icon, that's the closest it would go but that is the correct spot on Sugnall Street. Albeit not in the middle of the road, rather dangerous for dining. Thanks for spotting it, we will endeavour to shift the icon to the right. | |
| 52809865 by Danible | 1 | 2017-10-11 12:22:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I think you've accidentally included some test data in here (you can see if you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52809865 that your change stretches all the way down from Canada to mid-Atlantic, where the test data such as "Purple Street"... |
| 48264000 by jraller | 1 | 2017-09-14 09:06:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just for info I've tidied up edits in this area by http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/higuy and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/helloworld69 . I've suggested to those users that they might want to try OpenGeoFiction instead http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1478 http://www.openstreetma... |
| 2 | 2017-10-11 06:41:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | ... and also just for info, http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1561 (I reverted the two changes by that user). | |