| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36274850 by Stu Mitch | 1 | 2017-04-01 09:07:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Stu,To my knowledge, none of these roads "have numbers" in any meaningful sense. They were already tagged with an "official_ref" (used by and only useful to the council). There are no signs, so C93 through Flaxton isn't anything that you can "refer" to.Best Reg... |
| 2 | 2017-04-01 09:58:14 UTC | Stu Mitch | Hi Andy, I wondered about this. Occasionally you see these on signs but yes it is only occasional. They are references by local authorities, so if you had to report to a council it could be useful or if you wanted to query council work. Thanks for the comment though. Regards, Stu | |
| 3 | 2017-04-01 10:48:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | There is (or used to be) at least one signed "C" road near Helmsley, but they're pretty rare.It would certainly be possible (and not that difficult) to render "official_ref" on a map, but it doesn't make much sense to do so on a general purpose one. As an example, the "pr... | |
| 4 | 2018-10-21 16:57:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just for info, someone's since changed the C road refs here to "highway_authority_ref". If you want to see that you can look at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=16&lat=54.05272&lon=-0.96757 , which shows them. | |
| 63432961 by WJtW | 1 | 2018-10-12 22:20:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello WJtW,In this changeset you claim that you have used a source "Network statement Moldavia". This seems unlikely. What was the source that you actually used?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-10-12 22:20:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hallo WJtW,In deze wijzigingenset beweert u dat u een bron "Netwerkverklaring Moldavië" hebt gebruikt. Dit lijkt onwaarschijnlijk. Wat was de bron die u feitelijk gebruikte?Vriendelijke groeten,Andy | |
| 3 | 2018-10-14 10:10:08 UTC | WJtW | Sory I used Bing | |
| 4 | 2018-10-20 10:53:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. Can you reply to some of the other comments at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2097920 as well please? This was mentioned at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2294 but you still haven't done it.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Worki... | |
| 63221736 by Rachna05 | 1 | 2018-10-18 22:46:40 UTC | nplath | Reverted because of bullshit roads in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63662065 |
| 2 | 2018-10-20 10:36:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Rachna05 and welcome to OpenStreetMap. My apologies for the comment above from nplath. I've already explained to them that it was an extremely unhelpful comment - people who've just started mapping in OpenStreetMap need explanations of what the problems are and help about how to fix them, no... | |
| 63220645 by Saikat Maiti | 1 | 2018-10-20 10:25:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Saikat Maiti,I'm trying to track down the organiser of a mapathon which resulted in lots of changesets with the hashtags "#hotosm-project-101 #valectus #mapathon #highway" on 5th October. As you've used these hashtags here I wondered if you may know? I see that you're listed as t... |
| 57585068 by sabiyana | 1 | 2018-09-29 08:28:24 UTC | GerdP | Hi! Please check way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572230198You connected a highway=steps witha trunk road (AH2) that has foot=no.I assume that there is a separate footway next to the trunk road? |
| 2 | 2018-10-17 17:42:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Gerd,According to https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/blob/master/Grab%20Data%20Team this individual was a "directed mapper" for GRAB / Global Logic but left in July. I suspect they won't see your message.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 3 | 2018-10-17 17:57:58 UTC | GerdP | Hi Andy,well, so this will be one of many unanswered cs comments unless sabiyana is still active for OSM... | |
| 61104414 by zakriya1 | 1 | 2018-07-28 15:03:42 UTC | rene78 | Hi zakriya, whom to contact with questions regarding the mapping efforts of Grab? Companies like Apple, Uber had a website with information. You have something similar? I realized that many of the Grab edits are of questionable quality and would like to discuss with them and the OSM community. Thank... |
| 2 | 2018-07-28 16:04:50 UTC | zakriya1 | Hi rene,Thanks for your time.Here is the link to our project page https://github.com/GRABOSMPlease let us know ur queries and we will be happy to answer and correct if we are wrong.Thanks, Zakriya. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-30 05:21:07 UTC | zakriya1 | Hi rene,Thanks for the inputs shared across the change setsWe have cross checked our edits and here are our observations :Lot of roads marked as Residential are changed to service and additional attributes of driveway and private are assigned.At first instance we are unable to give t... | |
| 4 | 2018-10-17 17:08:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | @rene78 If edits of questionable quality are continuing please email OSM's Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org . | |
| 63498739 by YanTremblay | 1 | 2018-10-15 06:58:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Lots of OpenStreetMap users have been trying to get in touch with you. You can see their comments at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3418895 . Please do reply to these comments before continuing mapping. |
| 2 | 2018-10-15 06:59:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | De nombreux utilisateurs d'OpenStreetMap ont essayé de vous contacter. Vous pouvez voir leurs commentaires sur http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3418895. S'il vous plaît répondez à ces commentaires avant de continuer la cartographie. | |
| 63512625 by Farhana Akter Rimu | 1 | 2018-10-14 16:15:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,There appear to be some unrecognisable tags in here again (hezard_intensity). Can you please check the data you have just added? If you don't use tags that other people can recognise, then your data won't be usable.Also, can you please use meaningful changeset comments (in addition to ... |
| 63453830 by Narayani Barve | 1 | 2018-10-12 22:30:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Do these roads really not connect to any other road infrastructure?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-10-13 13:27:37 UTC | Narayani Barve | Yes. They do connect. I could not complete the connection when I digitized these roads. Will do it when I get time. ThanksNarayani | |
| 63209913 by Gekke Henkie | 1 | 2018-10-04 20:58:11 UTC | eggie | Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits. Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group |
| 2 | 2018-10-04 21:01:38 UTC | Martin Borsje | reverted; abuse | |
| 3 | 2018-10-12 22:15:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Gekke%20Henkie Comments like this are not OK either.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. | |
| 4 | 2018-10-12 22:16:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Gekke%20Henkie Reacties als deze zijn ook niet OK.Vriendelijke groeten,Andy Townsend, namens de Data Working Group van OSM. | |
| 63209964 by Gekke Henkie | 1 | 2018-10-04 21:00:23 UTC | Martin Borsje | reverted; abuse |
| 2 | 2018-10-12 22:11:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Gekke Henkie,It's not OK to threaten to kick anyone off their bike :) Please don't do it, even as a joke.Best Regards.Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-12 22:11:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hallo Gekke Henkie,Het is niet OK om iemand uit zijn fiets te trappen :) Doe het alsjeblieft niet, zelfs niet als een grap.Vriendelijke groeten.Andy Townsend, namens de Data Working Group van OSM. | |
| 63240198 by Dartmouthmapmaker | 1 | 2018-10-12 21:43:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Dartmouthmapmaker,There seems to be a bit of to-and-fro editing happening with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/241781678/history . I guess that this is related to the discussion at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62593117 ? For info, if you create your own Garmin maps you can ma... |
| 63435932 by Carnildo | 1 | 2018-10-12 21:16:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for fixing - user blocked in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2292 . |
| 62396020 by Arlo James Barnes | 1 | 2018-10-10 20:06:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've changed the wikidata entry from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900 back - it's _not_ fictional. |
| 2 | 2018-10-10 20:54:12 UTC | Arlo James Barnes | I definitely never thought the buoy was fictional, and I have edited the Null Island English Wikipedia article to reflect the understanding I got from reading the referenced sources that while 'Null Island' can jokingly refer to a fictional island, the term also has a real-life use as an indicator o... | |
| 11003091 by Tuf66 | 1 | 2018-10-10 19:53:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What does "source=null" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89167128/history mean?Best Regards,Andy |
| 60162826 by Globeur | 1 | 2018-10-10 19:51:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | The website on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5718688950 seems incorrect? |
| 57800787 by mapland | 1 | 2018-04-06 16:08:16 UTC | Nakaner | Hi mapland,you uploaded files created with a third-party software in this and some other changesets. You claim that you created a GeoJSON file in QGIS. However, it looks to me that it was NOT a GeoJSON file. What is the real source of the data you uploaded.In addition to these questions, I w... |
| 2 | 2018-04-06 16:09:48 UTC | Nakaner | Btw, many of the uploaded geometries don't match the buildings on the aerial imageries of Cape Town which are provided by the city and are available in JOSM's Imagery menu. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-07 08:16:37 UTC | mapland | Hi Michael,You are so right! I made geojson's in QGIS off of January 2017 imagery. Thank you for all your advice, I am finding my way and feedback really helps. I will do my best to fix all the errors:1. use house number tag2. remove null values3. clear area valuesThe thing is we are ... | |
| 4 | 2018-10-10 19:46:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | @mapland We really need to tidy up some of this stuff - there are 5000 "amenity=null" here? What I'd suggest, given the problem with all aspects of this import, is to revert it and start again from scratch. The process to follow for imports is described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/... | |
| 63328462 by nianticgarbage | 1 | 2018-10-10 12:05:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!One quick question, would it be possible to use more helpful changeset comments than "SR updates" every time? People can see that the changes are in Santa Rosa; it'd be great if you also say in the comments what sort of changes they are.Also - any ot... |
| 63232222 by tchapell | 1 | 2018-10-10 08:30:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello tchapell and welcome to OpenStreetMap!There have been a couple of comments about some of your changes - you should have received these by email and you can also see them at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8912978 . Please do reply to them to explain things (in par... |
| 62809907 by Garmin-User | 1 | 2018-09-21 21:43:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Why have you deleted Gibraltar https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1278736/history in this changeset? |
| 2 | 2018-09-22 04:26:06 UTC | Garmin-User | This Relation was damaged by deleting https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345004359(comment: Ceuta - Gibraltar - La Linea -> Supresión de la imaginaria linea administrativa de las llamadas aguas de Gibraltar. Esa Colonia no tiene jurisdicción reconocida de aguas territoriales propia... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-23 08:31:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. The previous changes have been reverted now (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62835339 ). I'm not convinced that the entire Gib territorial waters should be an "inner" for Spain, but that's something that needs talking about to discuss what the shape of the inner shoul... | |
| 4 | 2018-09-23 09:00:37 UTC | Garmin-User | Thank you, I had seen it yesterday evening and corrected a small reverted error in timezone relation."I'm not convinced that the entire Gib territorial waters should be an "inner" for Spain..."...and an "outer" for British Overseas Territories. Yes, my opinion... | |
| 5 | 2018-09-23 10:45:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | My recollection is that both Gib and Spain claim the water, and _both_ have at least some control of at least some of it (e.g. the marine park). I don't think that Spain can claim to have control of Gib harbour, so this might be somewhere that overlapping admin-level 2 relations makes sense.The d... | |
| 6 | 2018-10-10 06:39:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Lo que recuerdo es que tanto Gib como España reclaman el agua, y tanto tienen al menos algo de control de al menos algo (por ejemplo, el parque marino). No creo que España pueda afirmar que tiene el control de Gib Harbor, por lo que este podría ser un lugar en el que las relacio... | |
| 62802039 by jlcc78 | 1 | 2018-09-22 20:17:57 UTC | woodpeck | Please refrain from politically motivated boundary edits like that. If you believe the boundary is wrong, discuss the matter on the relevant mailing lists and seek a consensus before acting. I have reverted the changed. |
| 2 | 2018-10-09 22:06:02 UTC | jlcc78 | ¿Por qué dibujan ustedes aguas territoriales a Gibraltar pero no a Ceuta?? | |
| 3 | 2018-10-09 22:08:56 UTC | jlcc78 | Mas bien creo que las motivaciones políticas están en los que dibujaron esos límites para Gibraltar (probritanicos) y para Ceuta (promarroquies). Esos límites sobran en estos momentos. | |
| 4 | 2018-10-10 06:38:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | As suggested in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62809907 , the discussion is probably best had on https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61207 to be honest - that way any interested parties will have a chance to comment.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 5 | 2018-10-10 06:39:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Tal como se sugiere en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62809907, la discusión es probablemente la mejor en https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61207 para ser honesto, de esa manera cualquier parte interesada Tendré la oportunidad de comentar.Atentamente,Andy | |
| 40630997 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-10-10 04:06:10 UTC | Warin61 | Hi,For Way: 324467140 you have tagged landuse=scrub.Scrub is not a 'landuse', in OSM the tag to use is 'natural=scrub'. |
| 2 | 2018-10-10 06:13:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks | |
| 61944705 by stadiaarcadia | 1 | 2018-09-04 16:20:25 UTC | SK53 | I'm afraid this is a huge mess. You have added a vast number of pedestrian highways in a stadium, which is incorrect and probably tagging for the renderer. These are presumably banks of seating. I doubt that you got this information from anywhere other than the website of the stadium or some other c... |
| 2 | 2018-09-04 17:07:33 UTC | bhousel | FWIW, I think what stadiaarcadia did here is pretty great and I have no issue with it. I agree it would be nice to say more about it's source. But numbered seating sections just as public as things like numbered parking lots or numbered train platforms? e.g. even if they take this information fro... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-04 17:36:59 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Hi, the first row was already included. It was a pedestrian way already, probably because you can walk over the stairs at the lines. I added the missing second and third rows (with the numbers between 200 and 350). I saw that various other stadiums (look at the large Canadian stadiums for example) a... | |
| 4 | 2018-09-04 17:40:14 UTC | stadiaarcadia | I am done with all my stadium edits by the way. I'm going to check all my edits for errors, most of my edits which contained errors have already been reverted/adapted. Please give me a little time to improve / revert some of my edits. Only a small amount of my edits still contain errors, I will fix ... | |
| 5 | 2018-09-04 18:10:20 UTC | SK53 | I have no problem with micromapping details of stadia, for instance adding numbered areas of seating/rows etc, but they are not routable pedestrian areas. I have changed these to stadium=seating (no idea if the tag is in use, but seems sensible, and keeps the information) and altered the name to ref... | |
| 6 | 2018-09-04 18:25:54 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Thanks bhousel and SK53 :) | |
| 7 | 2018-09-04 19:13:19 UTC | SK53 | I'm not sure of the best way to map gangways & stairs in the stadium. Probably use highway=footway (not pedestrian) and highway=steps. If these are a large area use area:highway=footway or steps in conjunction with a routeable way (steps in particular may be wide with many handrails to provide ... | |
| 8 | 2018-10-08 07:08:55 UTC | stadiaarcadia | I've fixed stadium areas at the MetLife Stadium, but you've made those invisible now. It took me a lot of effort to fix those, I saw that same style at numerous other stadiums. Can you please make those squares/areas visible again? | |
| 9 | 2018-10-08 15:48:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | @stadiaarcadia - above you ask "Can you please make those squares/areas visible again?" The answer is yes, but you're going to need to find a custom renderer to show the data. There are 4 map styles visible on osm.org. There's the "standard" one (which I presume that you're ta... | |
| 10 | 2018-10-08 17:55:46 UTC | stadiaarcadia | I didn't start with those squares, I finished the missing ones. Somebody else started with the squares and the numbers, I've added the missing squares.Can you also check this stadium:https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=bmo%20field#map=19/43.63322/-79.41859It's probably also wrong.... | |
| 11 | 2018-10-08 18:40:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Somebody else started with the squares and the numbers, I've added the missing squares.You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/619381259/history . Can you give an example of one that was there before? | |
| 12 | 2018-10-08 18:54:14 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Most of the areas in the first ring were not added by me for example. | |
| 13 | 2018-10-08 18:54:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you give an example of one that was there before? | |
| 37635608 by justinsulpico | 1 | 2018-10-08 18:45:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401849003/history doesn't look like a "highway=pedestrian" to me - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=pedestrian?uselang=en-GB for what one of those normally looks like. It looks like a section of a sports stadium, and the comment... |
| 63201923 by rivermont | 1 | 2018-10-08 18:07:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just for info a new mapper (with doodles as a first edit) drew this "river". Looking at the imagery, it appears to be half-way up a cliff face. Did you perhaps not check it when you changed the tags?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-10-08 18:13:43 UTC | rivermont | I found this changeset after looking the user's history after seeing a discussion in OSMUS Slack about the previous changeset. The way seemed in line with a depression from aerial imagery so I assumed they added valid info. It seems the river has been removed now though. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-08 18:35:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes - I removed it because, based on looking at the imagery it was half-way up a slope (which you can also see by looking at the contours on the cycle map - https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/10.96130/-12.63470&layers=C ). | |
| 61373464 by TomaszBracka | 1 | 2018-10-08 18:26:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello TomaszBracka,You appear to be involved in an edit war with several other mappers over the existence (or lack of it) of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/593753460/history . What I'd suggest that you do is to upload a GPS trace recorded by travelling down it, or photos on e.g. Mapillary. Wi... |
| 2 | 2018-10-08 18:27:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Cześć TomaszBracka,Wygląda na to, że uczestniczysz w wojnie edycyjnej z kilkoma innymi twórcami map, jeśli chodzi o istnienie (lub jej brak) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/593753460/history. Proponuję, abyś przesłał ślad GPS nagrany przez podróż w dół lub zdjęc... | |
| 63260497 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-10-08 13:18:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Re "All other London Airport on OSM are called London (name) Airport" so what? Just because X is called X doesn't mean that Y is also called X.For the record, Heathrow does not self-identify as "London Heathrow". See https://www.heathrow.com/ for example. |
| 63108257 by Leo Slager | 1 | 2018-10-05 12:56:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You appear to have removed some information from OpenStreetMap here. Previously this building was identified as a KPN office. This has now been removed, but the extra information (that this is a KPN Office) has been lost. When do you plan to re-add this? I tried searching for KPN in Amer... |
| 2 | 2018-10-06 09:21:42 UTC | Leo Slager | Dear Andy,Those changesets were reverted on request of the original mapper. You are right that now the name KPN Amersfoort is missing.The name KPN Amersfoort now has been added to the address-node, as usual in the Netherlands.Kind Regards,Leo | |
| 3 | 2018-10-07 09:15:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I see the name on 115 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2683429122 but not on the nodes actually in this building, 117 and 119? | |
| 4 | 2018-10-07 11:11:12 UTC | Leo Slager | That is correct. The Original mapper did not provide any information for these addresses and they are not in the same building as KPN. | |
| 63071623 by Mateusz Konieczny | 1 | 2018-09-30 19:44:53 UTC | ndm | Will be reverted - brand:wikipedia is not in the wiki.openstreetmap.org. Links in osmand, etc. will fail. |
| 2 | 2018-10-01 17:08:08 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Hopefully revert rate will be not higher than with other tagging for renderer.Good point about OSM website, I added "autolinking brand:wikipedia and other *:wikipedia tags on OSM website" to my (already way too long) TODO list. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-01 22:06:42 UTC | ndm | It breaks all existing tools -- will ask DWG to take a look -- if it just added something like wikipedia:link = brand, then fine it's just "noise", those that care read it, those that don't can continue as usual. | |
| 4 | 2018-10-02 06:59:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'd have thought that brand:wikipedia=en:IKEA was the correct tagging here, as that wikipedia entry isn't for this individual store but for the whole chain? The website (which points at the store locator page for this store) is of course OK. | |
| 5 | 2018-10-02 09:50:59 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Note that this type of linking is not new - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Secondary_Wikipedia_linkswikipedia, wikidata tags should used only if wikipedia article or wikidata entry is about this featureFor example famous tree may have its own wikipedia article. Trees t... | |
| 6 | 2018-10-02 09:56:30 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | "It breaks all existing tools" - incorrect tagging to satisfy some tools is not accepted in OSM - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_rendererNote also that false wikipedia/wikidata links break tools that expect that wikipedia tag to be used correctly. | |
| 7 | 2018-10-02 18:37:38 UTC | ndm | Still not sure what Żabka has to do with IKEA -- but good to see that there is a hint about "brand:wikipedia" in the wiki now :-)Perhaps linking to the discussion on the imports list would be better in terms of a justification -- and more informative. | |
| 8 | 2018-10-02 19:16:22 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | "now" - it is there since a quite long time."linking to the discussion on the imports list" - given that it is not an import (or even an automatic edit) I am unfortunately unable to provide such link. | |
| 9 | 2018-10-02 20:35:36 UTC | ndm | Maybe this would be good to add:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-September/thread.html#78902 | |
| 10 | 2018-10-03 10:25:18 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Is there anything useful in that discussion? I try to ignore "Yuri Astrakhan vs mailing list" threads. | |
| 62850792 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-09-30 15:06:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Same problem as previous changeset. While some of these are valid (Quy) some are not (Woolpit - I was there only a couple of weeks ago and there's no junction name signage). |
| 62849932 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-09-30 11:31:57 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, what is the source and usefulness of these names. When I have travelled along this stretch only the numbers suggesting the names are fictional or just descriptions.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-09-30 11:42:30 UTC | Greyseal18 | I got the names from sabre wiki which is a 100% accurate source and you might know the user C2r (Chris) who has help me with most things I know now. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-30 12:15:39 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you for your response, however the sabre wiki is not an admissible source in OSM as the source of the information it contains cannot be verified and is likely to be from sources not admissible in OSM.OSM prefers data that mappers have been and observed for themselves, not copied from somewhe... | |
| 4 | 2018-09-30 15:04:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've reverted this. See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2265 . | |
| 60598717 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-22 23:53:48 UTC | c2r | Where's the evidence for Brampton Hut being A1 J13a? There weren't any signs last Thursday indicating this change when I drove through. |
| 2 | 2018-07-28 09:29:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Last time I was there (Easter?) it wasn't signed Brampton Hut on-road either, though it's commonly referred to as that. With all the works nearby that might have changed though. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-30 14:50:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | (for completeness) Brampton Hut Services _is_ signed as that. It's the only signage for that I've seen though. | |
| 62580631 by Feliz Pereira | 1 | 2018-09-14 17:57:33 UTC | NunoCaldeira | Já lhe expliquei uma série de vezes que a Estrada Florestal das Funduras não possui este nome de Caminho das Funduras.Citação:"O envolvimento natural entre todos os elementos da natureza é brilhante, tendo numa primeira etapa, a companhia da levad... |
| 2 | 2018-09-15 16:40:36 UTC | Feliz Pereira | Caro Nuno Caldeira, como já disse passei lá no dia 04 de setembro e tinha as placas com o nome caminho das funduras de um e de outro lado. Se acha que estou errado então reverta o que fiz. Sabemos também que nem sempre os sites das Câmaras estão atualizados. ... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-30 10:16:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | @NunoCaldeira Can you please explain why you removed the name here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625544175/history in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62591129 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62591164 ? If there's a board at each end then surely the name is OK? Or are you sa... | |
| 4 | 2018-09-30 10:16:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | @NunoCaldeira Pode explicar por que razão removeu o nome aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625544175/history em https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62591129 e https: //www.openstreetmap. org / changeset / 62591164? Se há uma placa em cada extremidade, então certamente o... | |
| 5 | 2018-09-30 12:18:00 UTC | NunoCaldeira | @SomeoneElse as already pointed out,there's no board near ER212. The municipality website indicates what I'm stating regarding the name, it's a forest road as presented in the regional forest plan (the dirt road is under responsability of the regional forest and nature conservation institute,so it's... | |
| 6 | 2018-09-30 14:15:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | @NunoCaldeira you say "there's no board near ER212"; above Feliz Pereira says "como já disse passei lá no dia 04 de setembro e tinha as placas com o nome caminho das funduras de um e de outro lado". It sounds like there's a difference of opinion between you? | |
| 7 | 2018-09-30 14:16:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | (tradução automática para o benefício de qualquer outra pessoa lendo)@NunoCaldeira diz "não há tabuleiro perto do ER212"; acima, Feliz Pereira diz "como já disse passei no dia 04 de setembro e tive como placas com o nome caminho das f... | |
| 8 | 2018-09-30 14:18:32 UTC | NunoCaldeira | sent a scout there last Saturday and there's none. will go there soon and photo map it, if that's enough to prove i'm correct. whats there is a board about the hiking route | |
| 62508398 by Emad Soheili | 1 | 2018-09-30 09:13:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what source=snapp means on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624992363 please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 63045702 by dhs_hiker | 1 | 2018-09-30 01:44:07 UTC | smaprs | Stop loading fake GPX traces, like these: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dhs_hiker/traces why are you doing this? |
| 2 | 2018-09-30 02:32:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello dhs_hiker,Please don't upload doodles like this to a public map, either as GPS traces or as fake edits. If you'd like to contribute to an imaginary map then please consider something like https://opengeofiction.net/ instead.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Gro... | |
| 62595059 by Narayani Barve | 1 | 2018-09-26 18:10:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please try and use more meaningful changeset comments? Every recent one of them seems to be just "added".Best Regards,Andy |
| 51068028 by דוד-צבי | 1 | 2018-09-22 08:33:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,A street here has been renamed several times over the years:http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=265619999OSM's Data Working Group have received a message about this renaming. We're trying to find evidence for each name. If you've got any, it'd be really helpful if you could pass it ... |
| 2 | 2018-09-22 08:34:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | שלום,רחוב זה השתנה מספר פעמים במהלך השנים:http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=265619999קבוצת העבודה של נתוני OSM קיבלה הודעה על שינוי שם זה. אנחנו מנסים למצוא ראיות לכל שם. אם יש לך, ז... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-23 08:13:03 UTC | דוד-צבי | וואו כבר לא זוכר מה היה, זה היה לפני יותר משנה...זה היה כמו שעכשיו ושיניתי?הפוך? | |
| 4 | 2018-09-23 08:13:08 UTC | דוד-צבי | Wow I do not remember what it was, it was more than a year ago ...Was it like now and I changed it?or vice versa? | |
| 5 | 2018-09-23 08:14:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | No - you didn't rename it - I'm just trying to find people who've edited in the area who might remember what the name is!Best Regards,Andy | |
| 6 | 2018-09-26 09:43:58 UTC | דוד-צבי | עד שנמסר לרשות הפלסטינית, כביש זה מוספר ככביש 55 | |
| 7 | 2018-09-26 09:44:06 UTC | דוד-צבי | Until it was transferred to the Palestinian Authority, this road was numbered as Route 55 | |
| 8 | 2018-09-26 12:47:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. In OSM, it currently has no name. | |
| 62744445 by addresshistory*org | 1 | 2018-09-20 12:11:56 UTC | Woazboat | Hallo,Gibt es einen Grund warum du diese Adressdaten löschst? Wurde das irgendwo besprochen?Würde gerne mehr über den Hintergrund für diesen Edit erfahren, ansonsten schaut das für mich nach mutwilliger Zerstörung aus.lg |
| 2 | 2018-09-20 19:01:10 UTC | addresshistory*org | Danke Woazboat das du Dich als lokaler Mapper meldest. Wie Du sicher mitverfolgt hast, gibt es in Österreich eine Initiative die Adress- Situation in unserem Land zu verbessern. Informationen findest Du dazu hier https://www.openstreetmap.at/2017/03/josm-plugin-fuer-oesterreichische-adressen-d... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-25 21:13:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | @addresshistory*org - you've removed data from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/564429130/history , but where has it been moved to? | |
| 4 | 2018-09-25 21:37:33 UTC | addresshistory*org | Ich meine folgende Elemente ohne Hausnummer https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CFlLtr6bzhOAhIDr9ggyaqExtahjkNgc | |
| 5 | 2018-09-25 22:00:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you saying that this building does not have an address? | |
| 6 | 2018-09-26 05:53:10 UTC | addresshistory*org | Hallo SomeoneElse, bei diesem Gebäude handelt es sich ein Reihenhaus, Die Straße ohne Hausnummer auf dem äußeren Gebäudeumriss ist daher falsch. Adressen haben in Österreich üblicherweise jeweils eine Hausnummer. In den OpenSource Daten des Bundesamt für Eic... | |
| 62158983 by Mahede Hasan | 1 | 2018-09-24 07:47:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Among other things, there's a problem with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237375564 - the whole road has been set to "bridge=culvert" which is (a) extremely unlikely and (b) not a very meaningful tag.You've made a very large number of edits in a ve... |
| 2 | 2018-09-24 07:47:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | হ্যালো এবং OpenStreetMap স্বাগতম!অন্যান্য বিষয়ের মধ্যে, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237375564- এর সাথে একটি সমস্যা রয়েছে - পুরো রাস্তাটিকে "... | |
| 62858431 by jlcc78 | 1 | 2018-09-23 19:16:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Is this a work in progress? Right now, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1278736 is broken.Best Regards, Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-23 19:16:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | ¿Es esto un trabajo en progreso? En este momento, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1278736 está roto.Atentamente,Andy | |
| 3 | 2018-09-23 19:21:47 UTC | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62859484 where the changeset comment is: revert repeated damage to Gibraltar boundary, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2253 | |
| 55832183 by Humus015 | 1 | 2018-09-22 08:33:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,A street here has been renamed several times over the years:http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=265619999OSM's Data Working Group have received a message about this renaming. We're trying to find evidence for each name. If you've got any, it'd be really helpful if you could pass it ... |
| 2 | 2018-09-22 08:34:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Ciao,Una strada qui è stata ribattezzata più volte nel corso degli anni:http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=265619999Il gruppo di lavoro sui dati di OSM ha ricevuto un messaggio su questa rinomina. Stiamo cercando di trovare prove per ogni nome. Se ne hai, sarebbe davvero uti... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-22 13:16:29 UTC | Humus015 | Actually the name still same as opm_director as october 2017. I did not remember to change this myself. | |
| 4 | 2018-09-22 13:26:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Humus015 Thanks - I realised that you did not change the name; I was just wondering if you had first-hand knowledge of which one was correct? | |
| 5 | 2018-09-22 17:54:59 UTC | Humus015 | Hi Sir, actually not, but I will ask to locals when i'll go there again. Bye. | |
| 51770777 by Mr Massri | 1 | 2018-09-22 08:33:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,A street here has been renamed several times over the years:http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=265619999OSM's Data Working Group have received a message about this renaming. We're trying to find evidence for each name. If you've got any, it'd be really helpful if you could pass it ... |
| 51427937 by ADHAM Inc | 1 | 2018-09-22 08:31:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,This street has been renamed several times over the years:http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=265619999OSM's Data Working Group have received a message about this renaming. In order to help confirm what the real name is, it would be helpful if you could refer to any source that you h... |
| 52989553 by OpenStreetMap Director | 1 | 2018-09-22 08:30:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,This street has been renamed several times over the years: http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=265619999 OSM's Data Working Group have received a message about this renaming. In order to help confirm what the real name is, it would be helpful if you could refer to any source that yo... |
| 42733719 by Constable | 1 | 2018-09-21 19:41:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for re-adding this. The previous node was https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/896552594/history just to the west. It got deleted by an SEO spammer who presumably searched OSM for "Seo" :) |
| 62668869 by Julio_Costa_Zambelli | 1 | 2018-09-19 02:10:35 UTC | diangeloeyan | Me gustaría saber por qué de nuevo están borrando mis ediciones que están acorde a la realidad, gracias, PD: espero un respuesta pronta, porque al parecer tu otro colega no fue lo sufucientemente profesional como para responder, (gente así no debería ser p... |
| 2 | 2018-09-21 13:12:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Julio_Costa_Zambelli thanks for the revert. The latest sock-puppet of this user has been blocked in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2243 . | |
| 62587297 by farnaz_m_s | 1 | 2018-09-16 11:38:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what sorce=snapp on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625590744/history means? We've had complaints that many of your changes are problematical - please try and be more careful.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 62291593 by Andre68 | 1 | 2018-09-16 11:23:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Andre68,Before making any sort of "fixes" please do try and understand what it is your are changing. In this case you've "fixed" a non-existent island (see the link in the data to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Sandy%20Island,%20New%20Caledonia?uselang=en-GB ) added by... |
| 62629726 by Ant Ko | 1 | 2018-09-16 10:30:38 UTC | Colin Smale | Please revert this change. Leave UK tagging and UK politics to the UK community. |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 11:11:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | @The%20Maarssen%20Mapper Changeset reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62632427 .@Ant%20Ko You've made a number of problematical changes to OSM in the past and have been blocked for periods of time for doing so: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Ant%20Ko/blocks . Please don't m... | |
| 62445248 by Elham_Soltanzadeh | 1 | 2018-09-16 10:57:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what source=snapp means on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624349310 please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 62440791 by elham__sharif | 1 | 2018-09-16 10:55:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what source=snapp means on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624314985/history please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 62522410 by BJaVaD | 1 | 2018-09-16 10:52:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what source=snapp means on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625080842 please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 62522305 by Benyamin_sohrabi | 1 | 2018-09-16 10:43:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what source=snapp means on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625080299 please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 62476642 by behrad1392 | 1 | 2018-09-16 10:42:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what source=snapp means on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624647954 please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 62523135 by Bahare Mirsasani | 1 | 2018-09-16 10:41:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what source=snapp means on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625090552 ?Best Regards,Andy |
| 62480459 by ArashAT | 1 | 2018-09-16 10:39:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what source=snapp means on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624673215 ?Best Regards,Andy |
| 62565997 by aliasghar_rezaei | 1 | 2018-09-16 10:25:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what source=snapp on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5904991308 means please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 62488165 by agha alireza | 1 | 2018-09-16 10:23:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what source=snapp on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5899333838 means please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 62601381 by adelfekri | 1 | 2018-09-16 10:21:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what source=snapp on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5791580746/history means?Best Regards,Andy |
| 62309987 by KamranNorouzi | 1 | 2018-09-16 08:01:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 08:02:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 3 | 2018-09-16 08:21:52 UTC | KamranNorouzi | با سلام بنده عضو تیم نقشه اسنپ هستم و تلاش داریم نقشه ها رو تا جای ممکن اپدیت کنیم و منابعمون از اطلاعات شهرداری ها و افرادی که مقیم شهرها هستن تامین میشه | |
| 4 | 2018-09-16 09:34:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Thanks for your reply. Firstly, what I'd suggest that you and all other members of Snapp's mapping team do is put a message in their OSM user page to explain who they are and what they are doing, like this one from a different company: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/manoharuss .Ther... | |
| 5 | 2018-09-16 09:35:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،متشکرم برای پاسختان. اولا، آنچه که من پیشنهاد می کنم این است که شما و سایر اعضای تیم نقشه برداری اسنپ را انجام می دهید، در صفحه کاربر OSM خود پیامی برای توضیح این... | |
| 62518563 by mostafa yasavoli64 | 1 | 2018-09-15 11:08:25 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM. Please pay some attention to the correct spelling of all tags. They must be spelled correctly, otherwise they can't be used by any software. In your edits I found various such mistakes:Admin Level\tAdmin Level_admin-lelel\tadmin-level\tAdmin_level\tadmin_levil\ta... |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 07:53:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625061040 is?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 3 | 2018-09-16 07:54:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا شما می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" در https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625061040 چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 4 | 2018-09-16 08:25:52 UTC | mostafa yasavoli64 | سلام مرز محله هست ومشترک بین دومحله ده حلاج وشهرک | |
| 5 | 2018-09-16 09:23:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks, but under what licence did "snapp" give you the neighbourhood information? Also, does this definition of a neighbourhood (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8682586 for example) exist as a legal subdivision or is it just a rough idea of the boundary? | |
| 6 | 2018-09-16 09:23:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | با تشکر، اما تحت کدام مجوز "snapp" به شما اطلاعات محله داده است؟ همچنین، آیا این تعریف محله (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8682586 به عنوان مثال) به عنوان یک زیرساخت قانونی وجود... | |
| 62545063 by adnan3003 | 1 | 2018-09-16 09:05:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 09:05:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 62424935 by mostafa12 | 1 | 2018-09-16 09:03:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 09:03:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 62421962 by vahid66 | 1 | 2018-09-16 08:43:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 08:43:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 62483012 by azar banafshi | 1 | 2018-09-16 08:40:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 08:40:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 62585854 by MohammadRezaT | 1 | 2018-09-16 08:37:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 08:37:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 62440892 by yashar__moshirfar | 1 | 2018-09-16 08:34:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 08:34:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 62424145 by mehdi_ahmadi | 1 | 2018-09-16 08:27:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 08:28:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 62544979 by saeid_hs | 1 | 2018-09-16 08:25:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 08:25:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 62609585 by wambacher | 1 | 2018-09-16 08:22:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any idea how https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625740884/history (1 v1 object) got source=snapp on it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 12:25:07 UTC | wambacher | No idea, andy. i usually don't change WAY attributes exept admin_level & sometimes boundary=administrative.But I know "snapp" from the IRAN, because snapp is currently causing big problems there. if you need more infos pls. contact me via mail.walter | |
| 62541064 by Farbod Bahmani | 1 | 2018-09-16 08:21:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 08:21:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 62551299 by Amiraydin Atashi | 1 | 2018-09-16 08:18:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 08:18:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 62520272 by Ramin2701 | 1 | 2018-09-16 08:15:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 08:15:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 62549192 by Ebrahim Ejazy | 1 | 2018-09-16 08:11:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 08:11:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 62482557 by saeedeh man | 1 | 2018-09-16 08:04:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 08:04:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 62541757 by Mehrdad Yahyaei | 1 | 2018-09-16 07:59:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 08:00:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 62489336 by mehdi0571 | 1 | 2018-09-16 07:57:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 07:57:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 62457544 by he2sam | 1 | 2018-09-16 07:48:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" (on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624425801 ) is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 07:49:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" (در https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624425801) چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 62540523 by Adel Daryapeyma | 1 | 2018-09-16 07:45:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 07:45:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 62415952 by mSarvi | 1 | 2018-09-16 07:27:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 07:27:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 62511098 by Amin Saleh | 1 | 2018-09-16 07:17:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "source=snapp" is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 07:23:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | سلام،آیا می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" چیست؟با احترام،اندی | |
| 51014313 by tms13 | 1 | 2018-09-08 16:00:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,There seems to be a bit of duplicate here - presumably https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514599377#map=19/56.09583/-4.37056&layers=H and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113081869#map=18/56.09578/-4.37026&layers=H are the same thing? You can see them both rendered at https://map.at... |
| 2 | 2018-09-10 18:57:06 UTC | tms13 | There are two aqueducts: one opened in 1859 and the other in 1901. That extra one (without a start_date) looks like an imposter. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-10 19:57:23 UTC | tms13 | Okay, I've unified them: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62465706 | |
| 4 | 2018-09-15 12:46:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - but just checking are https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514341468 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216811626 really different, or are they part of the same branch? | |
| 5 | 2018-09-17 19:56:13 UTC | tms13 | Thanks for that - I've merged those two, and a couple more duplicate bridges that I found. Do comment again if you find any more (or fix them yourself if it's obvious - there's a relation that might be useful: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7455658). | |
| 46092969 by fayor | 1 | 2018-08-17 13:18:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello fayor,Can you explain what the problem was with the roads that you deleted here?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2018-08-17 13:23:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also, what was the source that you used to add https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474705701 ? | |
| 3 | 2018-08-17 13:50:25 UTC | fayor | Ciao Andy, scusami ma dopo un anno non posso ricordare nulla nello specifico. Se qualcuno si è accorto di errori o inesattezze può correggere senza problemi. | |
| 4 | 2018-08-20 09:15:13 UTC | bubix | Innanzitutto grazie per tuo prezioso nell'aggiornare le mappe Osm. Nel caso di Punta Secca ed in particolare della strada da te indicata Via Filippo Pennavira https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474705701 il mio consiglio è nel dubbio di non nominare strade prese da altre fonti (https://www.via... | |
| 5 | 2018-08-20 14:23:30 UTC | fayor | Non so quanto possa servire verificare di presenza… se non c'è una targa ciò non significa che la strada non si chiami così e spesso nemmeno gli abitanti lo sanno. Per certo la via rientra nello stradario comunale dell'Agenzia delle Entrate. Le "altre fonti" pos... | |
| 6 | 2018-08-22 05:59:48 UTC | bubix | Dai dati Istat http://www.istat.it/.../dati.../dati_sc_provvisori.zip Censimento ISTAT 2011 risulta un solo civico "19;Sicilia;088;Ragusa;010;Santa Croce Camerina;88010;8801010001;10001;Caucana-Finaiti-Casuzze-Finaiti N.;1;;;VIA;FILIPPO PENNAVARIA;1;" che non ha coordinate...riesci mica e ... | |
| 7 | 2018-08-22 10:41:20 UTC | corfede | Ciao Fayor, posso dire per esperienza diretta che non sono rari i casi di errori anche sullo stradario dell'Agenzia delle Entrate. Come indicato da Paolo l'atto deliberativo del comune dovrebbe togliere ogni dubbio. Ciao, Federico. | |
| 8 | 2018-09-12 10:18:53 UTC | bubix | Nel mese di agosto 2018 ho incontrato i tecnici del comune di Santa Croce Camerina che mi hanno permesso di consultare l'Ordinanza n.103 del 31.07.1995 prot.12485 riguardante la denominazione dei toponimi di Punta Secca. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Ordinanza_103.pdfhttps://wiki.opens... | |
| 9 | 2018-09-12 15:04:02 UTC | fayor | Le situazioni anomale di cui parli derivano dal sospetto ingiustificato di altri utenti, in disaccordo per vari motivi su quanto viene mappato. Ho già chiarito che l'informazione riguardante quella via, come pure di tute le altre, l'ho ricavata dai dati Istat e dell'Agenzia delle Entrate (che... | |
| 10 | 2018-09-15 12:22:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Have you got a link for "Le situazioni anomale di cui parli derivano dal sospetto ingiustificato di altri utenti"? | |
| 62451136 by Juan José Torvaño T | 1 | 2018-09-11 12:36:43 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62487256 where the changeset comment is: Restoring Spain and Morocco as per https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2234 |
| 2 | 2018-09-12 14:00:07 UTC | Juan José Torvaño T | Ya que no hay acuardo entre los dos paises se deberia tomar una postura neutral, y para ello se deberia de tomar la normativa internacional al respecto que es la que se aplica a todos los paises, que seria la de la convencion de las naciones sobre el derecho del mar en la parte 2ª seccion 2&ord... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-12 14:01:26 UTC | Juan José Torvaño T | (... de las naciones unidas sobre el ...) | |
| 4 | 2018-09-15 10:58:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,The relevant OSMF policy about disputed boundaries is here: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf . Basically, it comes down to the "on the ground rule" - who has control of a particular location? In the case of Ceuta the current OSM bou... | |
| 5 | 2018-09-15 10:58:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hola,La política pertinente de OSMF sobre límites disputados está aquí: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf.Básicamente, todo se reduce a la "regla básica": ¿quién tiene el control de un... | |
| 49758202 by mountainmonkey | 1 | 2018-09-08 16:00:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,There seems to be a bit of duplicate here - presumably https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514599377#map=19/56.09583/-4.37056&layers=H and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113081869#map=18/56.09578/-4.37026&layers=H are the same thing? You can see them both rendered at https://map.at... |
| 2 | 2018-09-09 16:26:13 UTC | mountainmonkey | Yes you're right, all I did was re-tag 113081869 to put it underground. Feel free to delete one. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-10 19:55:54 UTC | tms13 | Okay, I've unified these: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62465706 | |
| 61719524 by dhx1 | 1 | 2018-08-17 14:55:22 UTC | TheSolarGuy | Why are you always adding "fixme"="name,operator,frequency,voltage" ? There is usually no name, the operator is always "China State Grid" for HV lines, the frequency is always 50 Hz and the voltage should be estimated BY YOU. Oddly you only put this fixme to other peopl... |
| 2 | 2018-08-18 00:06:26 UTC | dhx1 | In that case I extended an existing line with "fixme" tags, or joined together multiple line segments where one had a "fixme" tag. I don't add voltages, operators, etc unless I can provide a source/reference for that information. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-04 20:47:29 UTC | TheSolarGuy | Hi dhx1,please let me confirm, that you are doing good work. The tags criticized by me were not introduced by you, so I'm very sorry for my rant. I'm writing you, because it seems that I'm in company with very bad actor (see above).Kind regards | |
| 4 | 2018-09-07 20:10:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi folks,I've hidden the offensive (and misspelt!) insult that TheSolarGuy was referring to above.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. | |
| 62323897 by kiky423 | 1 | 2018-09-07 09:29:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello kiky423,Please use meaningful changeset comments! Simply answering "no comment" each time doesn't help other mappers understand the changes that you are making.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-07 09:30:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Poštovani kiky423,Koristite smislene komentare changeset! Jednostavno odgovaranje na "bez komentara" svaki put ne pomaže drugim maperima razumjeti promjene koje napravite.Lijepi Pozdrav,Andy | |
| 62354694 by Proud Salopian | 1 | 2018-09-06 21:05:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Can you explain what "factually not a town" means here? What gets mapped as cities / towns / villages can be contentious (and the comments on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place are all relative - there's no "this is a town, this is a village").I've mentioned th... |
| 62325475 by stadiaarcadia | 1 | 2018-09-06 08:19:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | One thing that might be missing is "the bit where people sit or stand at north and south without a roof". That's tricky, because there isn't a 100% accepted way of tagging those in OSM. There's "leisure=bleachers", as described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure... |
| 2 | 2018-09-06 08:43:50 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Thank you very much for the information SomeoneElse. By the way, I've found a stadium which is added, but doesn't show up. Other buildings in the area also don't show up. Do you know what is wrong with it? This is the one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/40.67839/122.11570&layers=N | |
| 3 | 2018-09-06 09:10:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463862870#map=16/40.6800/122.1167&layers=N is mapped as one huge building, which may not be correct. | |
| 4 | 2018-09-06 09:36:08 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Thanks again! I've fixed this error. | |
| 5 | 2018-09-06 17:59:09 UTC | freebeer | Be careful with the name you changed.I am not familiar enough with turkish to know where to expect them, but the i-without-dot and I-with-dot, İ, see common use.Here the Balıkesir is the city name and already is present in the address data as ı without a dot, but you have typed it instead as ... | |
| 6 | 2018-09-06 19:37:42 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Thanks for the hint, yes you're right about this. I've changed the name into "Balıkesir". | |
| 7 | 2018-09-07 08:22:43 UTC | freebeer | thanks.comparing the geometry here against the mediocre available background imagery, there are a few niggling hints i can come up with, that you are free to reject as too petty..the shape of the footie pitch and the stands looked to be slightly off of rectangular. i selected the pitch in my ... | |
| 8 | 2018-09-11 07:28:26 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Thank you for the information again freebeer :) (I saw you wrote this message a few days ago, I missed it for some reason). | |
| 59757033 by Jack Bowers | 1 | 2018-07-29 06:10:46 UTC | Unggo99 | Theres some node/way problems around the Edgewood Oak Preserve admin borders. |
| 2 | 2018-09-04 21:31:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Unggo99,There were some problems with some more recent edits in this series. I've reverted those, but the nodes here have been edited by other users since (see e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5657503376/history ). I'd suggest some sort of partial revert of the nodes.Best Regards,... | |
| 62199947 by stadiaarcadia | 1 | 2018-09-02 09:38:15 UTC | NunoCaldeira | please be careful with your edits, you destroyed valuable information. you shouldn't delete elements like the pitch, gates. you added the ceiling as building structure destroying the 3D elements, which is incorrect. changeset will be reverted |
| 2 | 2018-09-02 10:18:37 UTC | NunoCaldeira | inspected your account you are a user with 2 months old with 2000 edits. and you deleted 12000 elements! agaim, DO NOT DELETE elements ( 30% of your edits are deletes), DO NOT delete elements. will keep an eye, if not, will have to report your acount. if you have naydoubts on how to proceed, please ... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-02 11:18:50 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Hi Nuno, sorry for that, I stopped deleting elements. I will only do safe edits, if I have doubts, can I contact you to check my edits? By the way, I’m almost ready with all the stadium updates. My estimate is that I will be ready this tuesday with every update. I did over 98% of all edits I w... | |
| 4 | 2018-09-02 11:28:39 UTC | NunoCaldeira | You can read about 3D tagging schemes here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/3D_taggingYou can check if a stadium has 3d elements at http://demo.f4map.com/ | |
| 5 | 2018-09-02 11:31:23 UTC | NunoCaldeira | Also read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dstadium make sure about the "relations" before editing,or else you are destroying detailed info | |
| 6 | 2018-09-03 12:55:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Re " I did over 98% of all edits I want to do." can you please explain what you _are_ trying to do? There are lots and lots of comments on http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8570285 where people are saying that you are damaging their local stadiums that you have n... | |
| 7 | 2018-09-03 12:56:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | One more thing - I'd suggest adding "what you are trying to do" to your OSM profile so that people can see why you are making these edits. | |
| 8 | 2018-09-03 17:22:48 UTC | freebeer | Also, you write: »By the way, I’m almost ready with all the stadium updates. My estimate is that I will be ready this tuesday with every update.«I substitute `finished' for `ready' as you have written in other comments.Are you certain of that? Half a year ago I suspect it was ... | |
| 9 | 2018-09-03 17:54:16 UTC | NunoCaldeira | this users needs to be ban. in 30 hours he done 156 changesets. if you compare the edits, its a mess, hes deleting multipolygon relations into simple "building=stadium" and then addin a pitch (which becomes hidden due to the lack of building inner). All his edits need to be reverted asap. | |
| 10 | 2018-09-03 18:02:06 UTC | stadiaarcadia | seriously?? You don't have to ban me, please explain to me what I've done wrong with this building=stadium. Please explain this to me, then I'll fix all my erros. | |
| 11 | 2018-09-03 18:03:47 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Not all my edits have to be reverted. I did thousands of edits in the last months, and only around 30 have been reverted. I didn't get complaints about those others. Please tell me how I can fix my errors, and I'll fix every one of those. | |
| 12 | 2018-09-03 18:06:27 UTC | stadiaarcadia | I've added hundreds of stadiums which were completely missing, I've added thousands of missing houses. They don't have to be removed. Just give me a little time and I'll fix all my errors. | |
| 13 | 2018-09-03 18:06:30 UTC | NunoCaldeira | as i mentioned, ONE THIRD of you edits are deletions. You shouldn't delete elements unless they dont exist any more, which im sure 95% of the ones you deleted still exist. Also, what's the database you are using to add these? | |
| 14 | 2018-09-03 18:08:19 UTC | stadiaarcadia | By the way, I only have to check around 40 stadiums for errors, like completely missing / missing names etc. | |
| 15 | 2018-09-03 18:09:07 UTC | NunoCaldeira | again, what's the source or database for these? | |
| 16 | 2018-09-03 18:10:16 UTC | stadiaarcadia | I don't delete those elements anymore, I didn't know that before. I did replace those deleted elements with other elements, please take a good look at those edits and you'll see. | |
| 17 | 2018-09-03 18:11:47 UTC | stadiaarcadia | I am a groundhopper, I've visited hundreds of stadiums. I also used Bing if the view is right. | |
| 18 | 2018-09-03 18:11:51 UTC | NunoCaldeira | really? you deleted items on this changeset, which was done yesterday. some of which were added years ago. | |
| 19 | 2018-09-03 18:13:52 UTC | NunoCaldeira | in the last 30 hours you deleted 500 elements in the map. 500!!! | |
| 20 | 2018-09-03 18:14:09 UTC | stadiaarcadia | SomeOne Else: That's okay, I will do that. Freebeer: Thank you very much for your usefull hints! | |
| 21 | 2018-09-03 18:15:58 UTC | NunoCaldeira | and when you make an edit dont use "stadium update". write details of what you did? change name, geometry, added entry, and so on. detailed information, not generic | |
| 22 | 2018-09-03 18:16:48 UTC | stadiaarcadia | I deleted 500 elements? I only changed the shape of elements if the shape could be better. I didn't delete those elements. | |
| 23 | 2018-09-03 18:24:56 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Some stadiums were not drawn, imcompletely drawn, drawn before renovation works took place, drawn poor, had old stadium names (a lot of stadiums often change names with new sponsors). I didn't delete those 500 elements, please take a good look at my edits. | |
| 24 | 2018-09-03 18:27:55 UTC | stadiaarcadia | I changed the shape of those 500 elements, I didn't delete those. | |
| 25 | 2018-09-03 18:28:52 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Most of those were minor edits, like a part of the stand / building which was missing. | |
| 26 | 2018-09-03 18:31:37 UTC | NunoCaldeira | as i said, in the last 30h you deleted >500 elements and modified 1179 elements. editing is deletions and modifications. deletion is deleting the elements, and you have done that number of deletions in the last 30h indeed. | |
| 27 | 2018-09-03 18:38:35 UTC | Alecs01 | I agree with Nuno, stadiaarcadia I appreciate your passion for stadiums, but you should stop your edits (already told you twice at least) until you just don't understand what you're doing. You are doing more damage than anything else, by far. | |
| 28 | 2018-09-03 18:43:57 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Okay I will stop now until I fully understand all my errors. I will fix everything, just give me a little time for that. | |
| 29 | 2018-09-03 18:52:38 UTC | stadiaarcadia | The last 30 hours... You told me yesterday that I shouldn't delete that many objects, and after that (which means today) I didn't. I did replace those deleted objects with almost the same object in most cases. If it had valuable information, I took over the information or I didn't delete it. | |
| 30 | 2018-09-03 18:57:33 UTC | NunoCaldeira | you shouldn't delete elements at all, unless they cease existence. you must edit them. and again, YES you did delete 500 elements in the last 30 hours. replacing means you deleted them, you SHOULD NOT DELETE, edit the existing ones. | |
| 31 | 2018-09-03 19:11:28 UTC | stadiaarcadia | I don’t do that anymore. I will stop editing now, I won’t change any stadiums anymore. I only have to check around 30 stadiums for ‘errors’ (missing stands, missing stadium names etc, can I ask someone else to edit these 30(?) stadiums when they contain errors or are incomple... | |
| 32 | 2018-09-03 19:14:01 UTC | NunoCaldeira | yes they are lost. thats why its CRUCIAL not to delete elements. Please read this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_historyThats why you should not delete. and yes they are lost since you deleted then ad redone them, when you should have just edit them. | |
| 33 | 2018-09-03 22:00:03 UTC | stadiaarcadia | I won’t delete anything anymore. I also understand the stadium tagging now. I will stop editing, but I will fix my errors, I’m going to check and fix my edits (please give me time for this) if they include errors. I’ve added thouaands of missing houses and hundreds of stadiums whic... | |
| 34 | 2018-09-03 22:03:38 UTC | stadiaarcadia | If I find a stadium with missing stands, a missing or wrong stadium name or something like that, is there someone I can mail who can do the stadium edits? | |
| 35 | 2018-09-04 06:36:42 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Also please keep in mind that only a small amount of my edits contained deleted objects (almost all of those have already been reverted). At MetLife Stadium for example, I deleted hundreds of very small objects (yes that was stupid of me). Those have been reverted, and after that I changed the Giant... | |
| 36 | 2018-09-04 06:57:28 UTC | stadiaarcadia | By the way NunoCaldeira, can you please explain "adding a pitch (which becomes hidden due to the lack of building inner)"? How can a building inner be placed the right way? If I know this, I can fix my edits with this error. I saw some pitches indeed aren't visible. I can't find the answer... | |
| 37 | 2018-09-04 07:02:03 UTC | NunoCaldeira | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples#Forest_with_lake_.28One_outer_and_one_inner_ring.29 | |
| 38 | 2018-09-04 07:39:06 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Thank you! | |
| 39 | 2018-09-04 07:51:58 UTC | NunoCaldeira | No problem, if you have more doubts let me know. Most of the information is on wiki. Regarding the multipolygon relation, check a few examples on the map and understand how it works before starting editing. There's also a couple of video tutorials on YouTube. | |
| 40 | 2018-09-04 08:03:04 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Thanks again Nuno, I'm going to watch those tutorials. I have a doubt about this one, can you please check if I added "alt_name" the right way at this stadium: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62244989 | |
| 41 | 2018-09-04 08:04:55 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Can you please also check if my last edit at Estadio Campeón del Siglo in Montevideo is fine now? I've changed leisure tag into stadium tag and stadium tag into building tag. Is it good this way? | |
| 42 | 2018-09-04 08:39:00 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Do you have some useful YouTube tutorials? I've found some, but not all of those are useful for me. | |
| 43 | 2018-09-04 09:58:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just in case you're not aware, you can also ask questions about how to do things over at https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/ . | |
| 44 | 2018-09-05 08:06:35 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Thanks! I've watched several helpful OSM tutorials now, a few minutes ago I did a test edit. Can anyone please check if this edit is completely without errors: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=18/8.89417/76.58889I've added the right size of the hockey field with the stadium stand at the ri... | |
| 45 | 2018-09-05 14:57:37 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Hi, "Tribune Colombier" of Stade Raymond-Kopa now has the same size as "Tribune Coubertin". Is now has a square shape. The old stand has been replaced with a new one. Who can fix this? I'd really appreciate that. Thanks for the help already.https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19... | |
| 46 | 2018-09-05 21:54:59 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Can anyone please check if my edit is without errors this way:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62325475#map=18/39.64155/27.88770&layers=NThe stadium name is now correct. Can anyone please tell me if I've added both stadium roofs and the sports field the right way this way? If it c... | |
| 62235038 by stadiaarcadia | 1 | 2018-09-03 12:47:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Your name change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554256656/history here looks like another name that you have made up. What was wrong with the previous name? What evidence do you have that it was wrong and your new name is correct? |
| 2 | 2018-09-03 18:34:29 UTC | stadiaarcadia | I didn't made this name up. Here you can see that "Mend-A-Hose Jungle" really is the official stadium name: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyleague/article-2405382/Rugby-League-Castleford-Tigers-rename-stadium-Mend-A-Hose-Jungle.html | |
| 3 | 2018-09-03 19:15:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes, it really is called The "Mend-A-Hose Jungle" but it's not called The "Mend-A-Hose Jungle (Wheldon Road)" which is what you have called it.See https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/castleford-tigers/castleford-tigers-home-is-renamed-for-third-time-1-5187... | |
| 4 | 2018-09-04 06:50:08 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Thanks. Can you please explain to me how the alt_name can be added? I can't find it over here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:alt_name | |
| 5 | 2018-09-04 07:17:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | If I click on the stadium in the iD editor the "all tags" list contains it. Currently "alt_name" is set to "Mend-A-Hose Jungle" and "name" is set to "Mend-A-Hose Jungle (Wheldon Road)". If you don't see a list below "all tags" you may nee... | |
| 6 | 2018-09-04 07:49:50 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Thanks, now I understand. "alt_name" is "Mend-A-Hose Jungle" and "name" is "Wheldon Road" is okay I guess? | |
| 7 | 2018-09-04 08:00:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes (or the other way around) | |
| 8 | 2018-09-04 08:06:44 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Thanks! :) | |
| 62001098 by FreedSky | 1 | 2018-08-29 08:31:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please use changeset comments - it helps other mappers understand what has changed.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-09-04 05:23:03 UTC | FreedSky | Thank you, if I feel the need to explain, I will leave a message. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-04 07:19:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | No - please try and explain whether you feel the need to or not!Other mappers may not understand the reasons behind your change (especially in contentious border areas) - changeset comments help everyone to understand. | |
| 62234596 by stadiaarcadia | 1 | 2018-09-03 12:49:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | What's the source of your change here? Have you visited it? |
| 2 | 2018-09-03 18:32:43 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Yes, this is one of the hundreds of stadiums I visited. | |
| 62244989 by stadiaarcadia | 1 | 2018-09-03 12:41:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Please using meaningful changeset comments. Using "Stadium improvements." each time is extremely unhelpful to other mappers. |
| 2 | 2018-09-03 12:43:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | I don't believe that Stoke's stadium is called "bet365 Stadium (Britannia Stadium)". It's called either one or the other - I'd suggest using a name of the current name and another name (loc_name, alt_name or old_name as appropriate) for the other one. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-03 17:15:30 UTC | stadiaarcadia | Allright, I’ll add more detailed comments. I think “bet365 Stadium” is the best name, because it’s the official name. “Britannia Stadium” can be alt_name, is that okay? | |
| 4 | 2018-09-04 16:32:07 UTC | SK53 | I'd stick with the more familiar name "Britannia Stadium", although it's complicated because that too was a sponsorship name, but the Britannia name lasted for nearly 20 years, whereas the bet365 may be more fleeting. For older stadia not built with a sponsor with naming rights, the old na... | |
| 62155417 by addresshistory*org | 1 | 2018-08-31 13:25:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please use more meaningful changeset comments? Currently every one seems to be "Completing addresses Austria".Best Regards,Andy |
| 62055106 by 100022412 | 1 | 2018-08-28 08:53:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. |
| 62063236 by Halloween123 | 1 | 2018-08-28 08:48:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please do use meaningful changeset comments. "Added Road" every time doesn't really help.Best Regards,Andy |
| 62053429 by freebeer | 1 | 2018-08-28 00:04:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for tidying these up - obviously there's still more to go (the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25451483 for example).Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-08-28 01:59:43 UTC | freebeer | no worries, there are at least two other mappers reviewing what remains of the conflicts, so that by the time i got around to them with my painfully crippled equipment, most had already been attended to.after i wake up (if i sleep :-/) i may make another pass over the edit wars and make certain i ... | |
| 57380833 by buiducbinh35299 | 1 | 2018-08-26 14:00:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what things like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5493391954 are in this changeset? It looks like it was uploaded by accident.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 62001218 by stadiaarcadia | 1 | 2018-08-26 12:43:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you explain what "Stadium improvements" you made here? |
| 2 | 2018-08-26 12:43:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Kun je uitleggen wat "Stadionverbeteringen" je hier hebt gemaakt? | |
| 3 | 2018-08-26 12:56:54 UTC | stadiaarcadia | The field is located in the central part between the four stands. | |
| 4 | 2018-08-26 13:32:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | What was the problem before? | |
| 61902366 by Robert Copithorne | 1 | 2018-08-23 15:47:43 UTC | Robert Copithorne | 18 hours later:This changeset does not appear to have been posted yet. The dataset I open when I start a fresh session of OSM using JOSM editor does not reflect these changes.Is there a problem with this changeset? I was attempting to clear up problems indicated in previous posts arising out of ... |
| 2 | 2018-08-23 16:49:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Re "The dataset I open when I start a fresh session of OSM using JOSM editor does not reflect these changes" what is it that you expect to see that you do not see? | |
| 3 | 2018-08-23 20:39:48 UTC | freebeer | hallo robert,your changes go live immediately. you can visualise what you have done athttps://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61902366which shows me it is too complicated for me to see at a quick glance what is lacking.However I re-loaded the area I posted in my diary comment to see if i ... | |
| 4 | 2018-08-23 23:42:27 UTC | Robert Copithorne | SomeoneElse, freebeer:I was expecting way 618633991, enclosing "Alberni Sproat Lake Taylor Arm Woodlands" to appear on the rendered map.I was attempting to split a large, complicated polygon in to smaller bits, as it was being rejected by the new rendering procedures in OSM.The n... | |
| 5 | 2018-08-24 00:50:44 UTC | freebeer | the -991 you list above was not deleted, but -992. assuming that is the one you meant, looking at the achavi link it is one of two clearly visible that you redrew to take a different path.but as i look again at the achavi and zoom in, suddenly green forests are spilling into the fields of white,... | |
| 61675064 by GOwin | 1 | 2018-08-22 19:46:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure about this edit? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5507447193 just looks like a spam node added by a now-deleted user. Are you sure you meant to edit it? |
| 2 | 2018-08-22 19:47:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Likewise https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5479219881 | |
| 3 | 2018-08-22 19:48:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Likewise https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5492964485 | |
| 61020725 by GOwin | 1 | 2018-08-22 19:48:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure about this edit? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5479289032 just looks like a spam node added by a now-deleted user. Are you sure you meant to edit it? |
| 43046941 by Fernando J Cruz | 1 | 2018-08-22 13:36:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338932061 seems to have a misspelt tag on it "source_dat".Best Regards,Andy |
| 47935217 by fredi_alf | 1 | 2018-08-22 13:34:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487971225 seems to have a misspelt "source_dat" tag on it.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-08-25 13:30:22 UTC | fredi_alf | Thanks for the notice.I corrected it.Fredi | |
| 61763933 by Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury | 1 | 2018-08-22 13:25:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "osmbd#LoGIC#undp" means?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-08-22 13:25:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | হ্যালো,আপনি কি "osmbd # LOGIC # undp" এর অর্থ ব্যাখ্যা করতে পারেন?শুভেচ্ছান্তে,অ্যান্ডি | |
| 61655207 by DaveF | 1 | 2018-08-15 20:15:11 UTC | tms13 | Are you using a script for this vandalism? Please reverse it so that it restores the standard and documented tags. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2018-08-15 23:03:16 UTC | DaveF | Explanation is on talk-gb. Join the discussion. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-16 20:25:18 UTC | tms13 | I've now subscribed to talk-gb, but won't be able to read until next week (I don't have email access here, only Web). | |
| 4 | 2018-08-16 20:35:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | (apologies if I'm stating the bleeding obvious but) perhaps https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/thread.html#21690 or http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html would help? | |
| 5 | 2018-08-16 22:27:42 UTC | DaveF | HiTms13 has been provided with that link a couple of times by other users in previous changeset comments.. | |
| 6 | 2018-08-20 19:23:01 UTC | tms13 | I *think* I've subscribed, but haven't received any messages yet. I'd really like to find out what caused all this damage... | |
| 7 | 2018-08-20 19:27:55 UTC | tms13 | Thanks, SomeoneElse. It sounds like this whole thing is about *rendering*? If there's a move to not rendering refs, then isn't the right thing to change your renderer, rather than corrupting the whole database to fit the rendering? That's totally against the "don't tag for the renderer"... | |
| 8 | 2018-08-20 19:41:36 UTC | DaveF | The expression is 'don't tag *incorrectly* to suit the renderer'. All tags are to the benefit of them otherwise it would be just black lines & dots.Putting the refs for certain classes of roads gives the option to render. As so few C, U refs etc are displayed on signs & only use internal... | |
| 9 | 2018-08-22 13:19:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | @tms13 For info, you should at least have had https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/021820.html delivered to your mailbox if you're subscribed to the list. | |
| 10 | 2018-08-22 17:09:42 UTC | DaveF | @tms13. If you send an email to talk-GB@openstreetmap.org explaining your PoV/concerns you will receive replies which you should be able to see. | |
| 61216655 by favas123 | 1 | 2018-08-20 09:15:49 UTC | chandusekharreddy | SH 2A broken |
| 2 | 2018-08-22 13:03:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Halloween123,Are you going to fix this one?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. | |
| 60348045 by Halloween123 | 1 | 2018-08-20 09:20:59 UTC | chandusekharreddy | SH76 broken |
| 2 | 2018-08-22 13:02:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Halloween123,Are you going to fix this one?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-28 04:31:55 UTC | Halloween123 | Hi,I have corrected it.Thank you. | |
| 61826155 by fayor | 1 | 2018-08-20 15:47:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2190 . |
| 61233242 by fayor | 1 | 2018-08-17 13:14:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello fayor,You've removed the road name from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473905456/history . It seems odd that the street is named "Corso Ho Chi Min" to the south and north, but not named that in the middle? Did you visit the street yourself to check the absence of a name there?... |
| 2 | 2018-08-17 13:57:26 UTC | fayor | Ciao Andy, come forse ti sarai accorto, visto che è evidente, io non metto il nome nelle biforcazioni agli incroci o in situazioni simili, perché le ritengo ripetizioni confusionarie e non necessarie. Potrà piacere o meno, è un mio stile di mappatura, non possiamo certo p... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-19 10:47:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for your reply.Omitting the name in this way (where it is present, but you think that it might confuse rendered maps) is called "tagging for the renderer" - please do not do it. If something has a name in real life (ask yourself - what name would locals refer to that as?) then it... | |
| 4 | 2018-08-19 10:47:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Grazie per la tua risposta.Omettendo il nome in questo modo (dove è presente, ma pensi che possa confondere le mappe renderizzate) è chiamato "tagging per il renderer" - per favore non farlo. Se qualcosa ha un nome nella vita reale (chiediti - quale nome gli abitanti del lu... | |
| 5 | 2018-08-19 13:04:57 UTC | fayor | Non è necessario spiegarmi cosa significa "mappare per il rendering", non stai parlando a un ragazzino o a uno che mappa da ieri, conosco la regola ma non la intendo certo come un mantra (come fanno molti). Così come non è necessario spiegarmi che le cose hanno un nome... | |
| 6 | 2018-08-19 13:25:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | The complaint that we (the DWG) have had is along the lines of "we, the local community, have spent a lot of time performing local surveys only to have details removed later". Looking at the pattern of edits and comments in this area there clearly _is_ a local community. You may not agre... | |
| 7 | 2018-08-19 13:26:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | 417/5000La denuncia che noi (il DWG) abbiamo avuto è sulla falsariga di "noi, la comunità locale, abbiamo passato molto tempo a svolgere indagini locali solo per avere dettagli rimossi successivamente". Osservando lo schema delle modifiche e dei commenti in quest'area, c'&e... | |
| 8 | 2018-08-20 14:29:29 UTC | fayor | So di cosa parlo e ti dico per certo che non esiste nulla ti tutto ciò a Comiso o nel ragusano. Sicuramente la segnalazione arriva da uno o due singoli che, per trasparenza, sarebbe opportuno venissero identificati per verificare l'esistenza di questa sedicente "comunità locale&qu... | |
| 61705541 by Ludovic Drouard | 1 | 2018-08-16 13:17:22 UTC | Arlas | I'm sorry for your work, but fayor will eventually delete it. He deletes street names and can't apparently be stopped. He did this to user "thetornado76" that started a thread, but no news since then. (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60258) |
| 2 | 2018-08-17 13:10:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Arlas,If there's a problem with "fayor" (or anyone else) deleting street names please let the Data Working Group know - send an email to data@osmfoundation.org. What we'd need to know is the way ID of the street(s) from which names have been deleted.Best Regards,Andy Townsend,... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-17 14:47:47 UTC | Arlas | Hi, I've already told this to DWG years ago, but at the end for the DWG this "wasn't a problem". There is a long list of way IDs. Take every black road in this page, that's fayor -> http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=highways&lon=15.05933&lat=37.49638&zoom=12&fref=gc... | |
| 4 | 2018-08-19 11:02:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Arlas,On https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61233242 I've said to Fayor "I would suggest that you refrain from making edits where you are not local for a period of time to allow the local community to get "their map" back and to undo your undesirable changes (like this one).... | |
| 61305210 by Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury | 1 | 2018-08-05 06:15:25 UTC | user_5359 | Hello! you add ten POI with very unusually keys (only a example)address=9.0damage=Yesdamage_date=2.0072009E7damage_percent=0.0damage_por=Fullsl=143.0tyep=PhysicalCan you (or your project) explain the meaning of the tags? Specially * values of address* why not lowercase values d... |
| 2 | 2018-08-06 04:33:39 UTC | aHaSaN | Hello #user_5359,Ms. Nazmun is working at a project in Bangladesh. She is a member of a 10 persons' OSM team who are adding the remote rural community risk and disaster data what will be later used for an interactive portal for future decision making. Many thanks that you have pointed all the tag ... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-06 15:21:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | @aHaSaN - Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury has been contacted a number of times both by other mappers and by the Data Working Group (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8176585 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nazmun%20Nahar%20Chowdhury/blocks ) about adding "garbage tags... | |
| 4 | 2018-08-18 08:31:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | @aHaSaN Please contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org . We've had to block this user again; for details see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2187 . We have repeatedly tried to help this user add data tha would be meaningful to everyone, but no conversation has y... | |
| 5 | 2018-08-26 11:18:44 UTC | aHaSaN | @SomeoneElse, Yes that was mistake from some members of LoGIC Project Data team during uploading the data came from field. and After your kind notification we are now correcting the data. You can find the detail about the project in my Diary https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aHaSaN/diary | |
| 61664787 by tms13 | 1 | 2018-08-16 14:21:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Is U4925 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31959185 really usable as a reference on that road (i.e, can someone navigate by it)? If not, it really doesn't belong in the "ref" field (at least - that's been the concensus in GB for some years, and was recently discussed at https://lists.... |
| 2 | 2018-08-16 15:04:17 UTC | Vclaw | The ref tag is not just for navigation. There is no consensus for removing all of these ref tags. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-16 15:31:38 UTC | trigpoint | They have been moved, not removed. No information has been removed. | |
| 4 | 2018-08-16 15:48:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've just reread https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/021690.html and actually there is a pretty clear consensus there.For the avoidance of doubt (since I have moved "ref" tags to "official_ref" near me after verifying that they aren't useful as refer... | |
| 5 | 2018-08-20 19:38:21 UTC | tms13 | Well, if that's what's going to happen, it needs the tag wiki for 'ref' and any replacement tag to explicitly say when to use the standard tagging and when to use the new tagging - preferably with plenty of time to update editors, renderers and any scripts that group results by road, before such cha... | |
| 61520682 by JohnLee65 | 1 | 2018-08-10 14:39:45 UTC | jc86035 | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please avoid copying from copyrighted maps without permission (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright). |
| 2 | 2018-08-15 18:55:24 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61694579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some features allegedly mapped from a non-licence-compatible source (shortly to be remapped from imagery) | |
| 3 | 2018-08-15 19:04:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | ... and I've remapped this green from imagery in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61694769 . | |
| 4 | 2018-08-15 19:04:59 UTC | jc86035 | Thanks. | |
| 44938340 by u003f | 1 | 2018-08-08 16:14:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What actually is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463968007/history ?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-08-15 11:27:47 UTC | u003f | Hm. Can't remember why I created this. As such, it should be deleted. It's a former road, and current adopted highway. Is there any way to mark up "adopted highways"? Though that would be better marked on its constituent parts. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-15 13:06:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'd probably add the designation tag (whichever one would be appropriate) to the individual ways. There are a few "adopted" ones at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/designation#values ; maybe one of those would work. I maintain a map style that tries to do something with designa... | |
| 61658561 by Halloween123 | 1 | 2018-08-14 17:41:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You're still using "source=knowledge" for these. What does that actually mean?Best Regards,Andy |
| 61656518 by Halloween123 | 1 | 2018-08-14 12:30:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please try and use meaningful changeset comments? "Added road" doesn't really tell anyone anything. Also "source=knowledge" does not explain what source you actually used to add these features in these changesets.Best Regards,Andy Townsend,On behalf of OSM... |
| 29493673 by SK53 | 1 | 2018-08-08 15:43:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any thoughts on what the designation of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59244299/history should be really? There are a couple of "designation=yes" around here... |
| 2 | 2018-08-08 16:03:23 UTC | SK53 | Ones where I could see the green sign from the car, but couldn't read the lettering IIRC. One might be able to make a guess from old maps (bridleways usually shown as a double dotted line), or just possibly geograph images (although this one shows pretty much the view I had from the car http://www.g... | |
| 9556908 by Alex McKee | 1 | 2018-08-08 14:48:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What does "designation=timber_haulage" mean on the B roads here?Best Regards.Andy |
| 18214501 by ehm1806 | 1 | 2018-08-08 14:43:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,is there any reason why Farmfoods here has "designation=Bridlington" on it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 61437634 by smb1001 | 1 | 2018-08-08 07:38:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Does an admin_level make sense here? Surely these have absolutely no administrative function. |
| 2 | 2018-08-08 08:28:09 UTC | smb1001 | You make a good point, and initially I didn't have one until reading the boundary=historic wiki page. I added the historic counties as they're not really 'historic' but current in a non-administrative sense. Similarly they had administrative function but only historically, so I'm not sure which to g... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-08 11:20:45 UTC | DaveF | Could you please refrain from adding historic data to the OSM. You've previously been asked to remove your previous edits, which belong in OHM. I've started a discussion on Talk-GB https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/021751.html | |
| 61335475 by Red_Ranger | 1 | 2018-08-06 16:02:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Red_Ranger,All of your changeset comments seem to be just "Updated the alignment" which isn't very helpful. Can you try and explain a bit more on what sources were used (just imagery, or was there a survey as well, and if so when?) and what sorts of changes you were making?We (a... |
| 2 | 2018-08-06 16:54:31 UTC | Red_Ranger | Yes, I can explain my edits more in my changeset comments going forward. In UAE, the Kaart team did a ground survey, and I used up-to-date Digital Globe Premium that matched our GPS traces and ground survey imagery. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-06 17:12:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. When was the survey? | |
| 4 | 2018-08-06 17:20:56 UTC | Red_Ranger | It was in February and June of 2017. | |
| 61102456 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-08-06 11:28:05 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | Your Bike Shed was the name of what is now the Micklegate Social, they just haven't removed all the signs yet |
| 2 | 2018-08-06 14:23:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I've removed it. | |
| 61224801 by rossomat | 1 | 2018-07-31 11:51:56 UTC | maraf24 | Nie rysujemy pojedynczych drzew jako obsarów. Wyłącznie jako punkty. |
| 2 | 2018-07-31 11:52:54 UTC | rossomat | to nie sa pojedyńcze drzewa ale conajmniej kilka sztuk obok siebie | |
| 3 | 2018-07-31 13:28:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello maraf24,Can I make a suggestion? Instead of saying "we don't map X like Y" can you perhaps explain with a little bit more detail why that is the case? You could refer to the wiki, refer to taginfo, etc. Just saying "you're wrong" is unnecessarily confrontational (even... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-31 13:29:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Cześć maraf24,Czy mogę coś zasugerować? Zamiast mówić "nie mapujemy X jak Y", czy możesz wyjaśnić nieco bardziej szczegółowo, dlaczego tak jest? Możesz odwoływać się do wiki, odnieść się do taginfo, itp. Samo powiedzenie "jesteś w błędzie" jest... | |
| 61224994 by rossomat | 1 | 2018-07-31 11:51:29 UTC | maraf24 | Złośliwe kasowanie placu i drzew. |
| 2 | 2018-07-31 11:53:45 UTC | rossomat | I CNOWU KURWA DEBILU JEBANY BAWISZ SIE NAPIERDALAJAC SWOJE WYMYŚLONE WANDALIZMY???? | |
| 3 | 2018-07-31 13:15:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello rossomat. You've been blocked before (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1982) for using inconsiderate language. You're currently blocked for engaging in an edit war. When that block ends, if you engage in foul language or shouting (capital letters) again you will be blocked again,... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-31 13:16:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Witaj rossomat. Zostałeś już zablokowany (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1982) za używanie niestosownego języka.Jesteś obecnie zablokowany za udział w wojnie edycyjnej. Kiedy ten blok się skończy, jeśli znowu zaczniesz używać wulgaryzmów lub krzyków (wielkich l... | |
| 61226907 by rossomat | 1 | 2018-07-31 12:45:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello rossomat,Can you explain what was wrong with the highwya=service that you deleted here? It seems to match the photographs that were posted to the forum at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=699553#p699553 . Has the situation changed since those pictures were taken? Earlier ... |
| 2 | 2018-07-31 12:45:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Witaj rossomat,Czy możesz wyjaśnić, co było nie tak z usługą highwya =, którą tutaj usunąłeś? Wygląda na to, że pasuje do zdjęć opublikowanych na forum na https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=699553#p699553. Czy sytuacja zmieniła się od czasu wykonania zdjęć? ... | |
| 61198728 by Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury | 1 | 2018-07-30 16:12:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury,You're adding data to OSM with meaningless tags again (as mentioned previously at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2024 ). Please don''t do this. You can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org .Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on ... |
| 2 | 2018-07-30 22:09:28 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61209814 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed garbage-tag import (following numerous communication attempts) | |
| 60586626 by Geomapper69 | 1 | 2018-07-29 10:18:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/606208734/history really exists? It looks like an entirely fake feature to me. |
| 2 | 2018-07-29 16:02:36 UTC | Geomapper69 | not sure if it is real, i was just fixing geometry errors | |
| 3 | 2018-07-29 16:19:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately "fixing geometry errors" actually makes it harder to correct errors like this in the future - harder to spot them in the first place (because they won't have been last edited by a problem mapper, and because they won't show up as issues on QA sites) and... | |
| 53620317 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-07-29 15:39:52 UTC | SK53 | Walton Dam a micropub I think, but like Chesterfield Alehouse not tagged as such. |
| 2 | 2018-07-29 16:09:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes - I'm sure I've missed lots of micropub tags! The "Walton Dam Nation" is a shop conversion - large for a micropub, but restricted opening hours, normal beer lines and normal (but small) pub toilets. | |
| 55242250 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-07-29 15:38:05 UTC | SK53 | Far for me to make a decision, but Walton looks rather more like a suburb than a village. I see it was originally mapped as a village by JonS way back when. |
| 2 | 2018-07-29 15:39:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Definitely a suburb | |
| 60462066 by raito | 1 | 2018-07-29 10:12:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello - can I ask you about your changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604774286/history ? It looks, to me, like an entirely fake feature. In your change here did you verify that it actually existed? |
| 2 | 2018-07-29 10:35:13 UTC | raito | Hi! Sorry, I missed that.. I only tried fixing duplicate nodes and self-intersecting ways. You may need to deal with that user Guntur Irawan Subagiyo. I guess you are already on it. Cheers. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-29 10:38:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi raito, thanks for that. I've already reverted everything by Guntur Irawan Subagiyo that hadn't already been changed, and asked the person that complained to the DWG to check what's left (they'd already done a significant amount of tidying-up already).It's a possibility that this user is one of... | |
| 61074192 by raito | 1 | 2018-07-29 10:16:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608515214/history really exists? |
| 2 | 2018-07-29 10:36:03 UTC | raito | Sorry, this one seems fictitious as well. | |
| 60468871 by Geomapper69 | 1 | 2018-07-29 10:12:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello - can I ask you about your changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604774286/history ? It looks, to me, like an entirely fake feature. In your change here did you verify that it actually existed? |
| 61147103 by Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury | 1 | 2018-07-28 17:24:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury,You're adding data to OSM with meaningless tags again (as mentioned previously at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2024 ). Please don''t do this. You can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org .Best Regards,Andy Townsend, o... |
| 56450658 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-04-30 11:19:50 UTC | ACarlotti | Can you provide some evidence of this? The only documents I can find online relating to this suggest that it might become an 'expressway', which is not (initially, at least) the same thing. |
| 2 | 2018-04-30 14:40:15 UTC | Greyseal18 | An expressway is a new type of motorway and the A14(M) will be the first one. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-30 21:06:00 UTC | ACarlotti | I've now read more of the Highways England Strategic Road Network Initial Report, and it seems that I was previously misinterpreting it. According to the report (P58-59), the highest classifications of roads will be "Smart Motorway", "Motorway", "Expressway" and "A... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-28 09:35:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | What actually was the source for this change? Is the licence compatible with OSM? | |
| 5 | 2018-07-28 12:56:25 UTC | Greyseal18 | Highways England Strategic Road Network Initial Report | |
| 60016450 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-23 00:02:15 UTC | c2r | This junction doesn't have a number. We've discussed this on SABRE wiki before. Putting junction numbers on OSM because you have a fantasy that they should be numbered, and then using the "OSM" source to reference the change on SABRE is unacceptable, and I'm sure the admins here will hav... |
| 2 | 2018-07-28 09:23:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | These refs aren't signed; I'll revert. | |
| 56524695 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-23 00:13:46 UTC | c2r | Looks like this user has been plagerising AA Maps here. |
| 2 | 2018-07-23 07:16:04 UTC | Greyseal18 | I email the AA and they said that was correct from Highways England so I can’t argue with them really after saying that | |
| 3 | 2018-07-28 08:52:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just to be clear - you can't use AA maps as a source (even if you've asked them).If you've asked them to release the data under an OSM-compatible licence and they've done so, then that would be a different story. | |
| 4 | 2018-10-02 06:03:51 UTC | GerdP | Does anybody know the current status of this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230135072 ? | |
| 5 | 2018-10-02 06:24:26 UTC | c2r | Unless anyone has free evidence or has seen signs indicating that the length of the road north of Scotch Corner is the A6055,it needs to be reverted, as it could quite easily be a copyright trap by the AA. South of here I believe it is. | |
| 60550631 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-22 23:55:25 UTC | c2r | Ah yes, the metropolis of Southend. When was it granted City status? Do tell. |
| 2 | 2018-07-23 07:12:43 UTC | Greyseal18 | Then why is Ely a city then because it is so small and nothing really happens there | |
| 3 | 2018-07-23 23:13:42 UTC | c2r | Because it has a giant cathedral... Southend is a town and unitary authority, but isn't a city. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-28 08:49:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | There's definitely a discussion to be had in the UK about "which are cities and which aren't" (despite what the OSM wiki says, different OSM communities worldwide have different ideas of what a city should be). talk-gb is the best place to discuss this stuff - having everyone set "th... | |
| 60973457 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-23 08:12:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I'm pretty sure that this isn't signed as the A46(M), at least not from the south, and I drive past here pretty regularly. What makes you think that it is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-07-23 08:14:24 UTC | Greyseal18 | Pathetic Motorways and SABRE Wiki shows it as a unsigned motorway and if your going to revert this edit then I’m changing the A14(M) from the A1(M) J14 to the A14 Spur to the A1(M) because that is what it says on the signs | |
| 3 | 2018-07-23 19:20:39 UTC | ndm | If all your edits are based on Pathetic Motorways (All media on this website is © Pathetic Motorways, except where noted that they are copyright of a contributor.Please do not copy without permission.) then I think they will all have to be reverted. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-24 14:17:33 UTC | trigpoint | Adding some local knowledge here, this is not signed as A46(M), mpaaing it as such is misleading and this change should be reverted as soon as possible.Phil | |
| 5 | 2018-07-24 14:19:38 UTC | Greyseal18 | Ok I’ll also rename the A14(M) from the A1(M) to the A14 Spur to the A1(M) (as signposted) | |
| 6 | 2018-07-28 08:44:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks | |
| 60806661 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-24 15:38:41 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi, in this change you seem to have changed a number of ways to have the ref M6 Toll or M6 Toll;M42 and set toll=yes when they are not within the region of charge for their use. I suggest that the name M6 Toll should only be used for ways where it is necessary to pay. M42, as previously set for the ... |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 16:43:30 UTC | trigpoint | I recently surveyed the signs on this section and can confirm that the edit made by Brian was correct and matched my survey of the signs. The correct OSM mapping is always what we see on the ground.Please revert these changes.Cheers Phil | |
| 3 | 2018-07-28 08:33:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes - pretty sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142234723/history isn't toll=yes since it's the southbound link from the M42 isn't it? Also I've always thought of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29180118/history as being part of the M42 (even though it probably has lanes signed as M6 Toll). ... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-28 08:42:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | As discussed above I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61137468 . It's probably worth raising any "interesting questions" about road ref values on talk-gb rather than just changing them as lots of people are familiar with this area. | |
| 60804872 by randomcode | 1 | 2018-07-25 22:10:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello randomcode,I'm not quite sure what's happening here. The changeset comment is "labelled HDB facilities for residents and a park connector" but the changeset only contains deletions? Should some data also be added?Best Regards,Andy |
| 61065367 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:49:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 60333406, 60333495, 60333514, 60333574, 60333595, 60333708, 60333776, 60333802, 60333816. |
| 60333816 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333406 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333495 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333595 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333802 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333708 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333514 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333574 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 60333776 by CozyCossio | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065346 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 18:49:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065367 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fantasy edits by CozyCossio reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted). | |
| 61065346 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-07-25 18:48:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 60333406, 60333495, 60333514, 60333574, 60333595, 60333708, 60333776, 60333802, 60333816. |
| 60705711 by stefanct | 1 | 2018-07-17 13:25:22 UTC | willebrord | Could you please explain? The summit cross is definitley there and a cross check in other guides/maps confirmed the name (see e.g. "Wien wandert" guide, Rittberger+Knapp 2015, http://www.freytagberndt.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/9783902999023_Innenansicht_01.pdf , S.14) |
| 2 | 2018-07-17 19:09:59 UTC | stefanct | Hi willebrord,there is a guy (apparently called Peter-Paul) who tried really hard toname the peak in question after himself. He lied on multiple occasions whenquestioned about his source and apparently even installed the cross youlinked in the changeset. There have been quite some discussi... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-18 11:05:44 UTC | willebrord | Ah, I see what I got involved in here. ;)Even though the peak might not have an "official" name I think we already reached the "point of no return": There obviously already is a more or less commonly used name for it; we can find "Peter-Paul-Berg" in printed guides [1... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-18 16:43:42 UTC | freebeer | Hallo willebrord,When researching this issue some years back, every single reference i could find all linked back to osm data.for a legitimate name, i expect to be able to find some mention that is completely independent.that automated weather services and the like have dumped osm with errors,... | |
| 5 | 2018-07-19 09:55:13 UTC | willebrord | I beg to differ. The situation here is completely different: This is _not_ a "fictional" place. The peak exists in real world, can be identified [5, see reference above] as a peak in real world (even without the now installed summit cross) and is even marked so in OSM.The only "prob... | |
| 6 | 2018-07-19 22:00:32 UTC | stefanct | the place exists but the name does not. as explained above *all* references are directly from osm/peterpp which actually shows how important it is to ensure good data quality. [5] for example was a picture uploaded by peterpp to wikimedia commons which got removed from there (because of the peak in ... | |
| 7 | 2018-07-20 14:12:10 UTC | willebrord | No, I do not agree that "this started as a fake"! This peak did not have any name and following the commonly accepted procedure someone successfully gave it a name and spread the name. That's it.The discussion is not about if it is acceptable _how_ "Peter-Paul-Berg" got its nam... | |
| 8 | 2018-07-20 14:31:35 UTC | stefanct | If you think adding a name tag to OSM with some arbitrary value that nobody but the person itself is aware of at the time is "a commonly accepted procedure" to establish a name for a landmark than I seriously doubt that you should edit any collaborative worldwide content at all. Also, ther... | |
| 9 | 2018-07-24 12:57:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Quoting a bunch of sites that all use OSM data is just an example of https://xkcd.com/978/ . If someone can produce a source that _predates_ the name being invented by an OSMer called "Peter-Paul" then it makes sense to have it as a "name" here, if not then it doesn't - the fact... | |
| 60973535 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-07-23 07:34:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Greyseal18,One thing that would be really helpful to other mappers would be to use better changeset comments rather than something like "Minor Edits" or no comment at all. Some of your changes already have this, and I know it can be a pain (especially from a mobile app) but it rea... |
| 56451463 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-02-17 22:55:01 UTC | GinaroZ | Pretty sure that is a motorway link - and not sure it should be called A92(M) either... https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=A92(M) |
| 2 | 2018-02-18 10:13:51 UTC | Greyseal18 | Well if you go onto view source you can see it’s a current motorway and if you go onto a website called Pathetic Motorways it also uses the A92(M) | |
| 3 | 2018-07-22 21:58:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | As discussed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56451569 the Sabre wiki isn't an appropriate source for OSM. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-22 22:03:46 UTC | Greyseal18 | Yes it is as I use it and all the information is true and if there was false info on the website your account will get banned. Also most of the info is on Transport for Scotland and Highways England.It is the information on OMS that can be false. This is not 1 of them it is true. | |
| 5 | 2018-07-22 22:04:29 UTC | Greyseal18 | Also if you think it’s false then I’m removing the A14(M) from the A1(M) J14 to the A14 Spur | |
| 6 | 2018-07-22 22:56:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Greyseal18 To be clear, just because a source is "likely to be correct" does not mean that we will be able to use it in OpenStreetMap. It has to be licensed appropriately so that it's OK for OSM to use it and also for downstream data consumers to use it as well. This applies to data from... | |
| 7 | 2018-07-23 19:05:45 UTC | GinaroZ | @Greyseal18 - The Sabre page I linked to literally says the A92(M) is a possible number, and the existence of the number is disputed. So probably best to leave the ref= blank!However the other issue is why it was changed to a motorway, as it seems like a motorway_link to me? | |
| 60361102 by jmacker | 1 | 2018-07-08 14:24:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,What actually is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604416603 ? It's never had any tags on it.Best Regards,Andy |
| 60419887 by jmacker | 1 | 2018-07-08 13:07:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | As I said in https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=706263#p706263 different OSM communities across the world have chosen very different approaches to "name" mapping. The Indian OSM community has for a long time chosen to use "English" in the name tag throughout India... |
| 2 | 2018-07-08 13:41:13 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60509406 where the changeset comment is: Reverting mechanical edit of names in India. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62872 for discussion | |
| 52470743 by Yorvik Prestigitator | 1 | 2018-07-05 06:52:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Assuming the pump is supposed to be a vertical one, then yes the handle is still missing.(Answering question asked in another changeset) |
| 59074892 by midwich | 1 | 2018-07-01 13:51:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm pretty sure the footpath doesn't go through https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5626349987 but over the bridge to the south (there was no other access over the stream when I was there just 3 weeks ago). |
| 2 | 2018-07-01 14:28:06 UTC | midwich | Ah, for that bit I went by the Ordnance Survey map, might be off a bit. Can you fix it? If not, I'll take a look when I'm there next and sort it myself, no problem. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-01 15:15:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've added the bridge (which still exists) and the designation based on the sign that used to exist at the west. The designation well to the east is still there, but it is currently impassible.Unfortunately we can't use footpath info from os maps until the copyright has expired, so the link north... | |
| 59882837 by midwich | 1 | 2018-07-01 10:18:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I was just updating the map between Slingsby and Hovingham based on a GPS trace from about 3 weeks ago and noticed a bit of duplication north of Fryton.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/598188076 is a footpath, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168742990 is... |
| 41734155 by Chris Parker | 1 | 2018-06-30 21:08:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that Lendal Cellars has a microbrewery in it? I've never heard that it has, and it'd be a bit unusual for GK if it did.Cheers,Andy |
| 60239535 by ForstEK | 1 | 2018-06-30 13:51:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | The majority of the edits in here (15 pages of ways vs 9) appear to be merely mechanical edits. |
| 2 | 2018-06-30 17:57:59 UTC | freeExec | Считаю, что правка была вполне корректна. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-02 09:02:14 UTC | Zverik | Not exactly: ForstEK indeed has retagged many buildings, removing "building=yes" from storage tanks. | |
| 46304500 by 58zarali | 1 | 2018-05-16 16:03:04 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | What is the meaning of fire_hydrant:brand=Opet? |
| 2 | 2018-05-16 16:04:10 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Also - what was license of data used in this import? | |
| 3 | 2018-05-27 15:30:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello 58zarali,The data that you've imported here has a number of problems. One is that the licence appears not to be compatible with OpenStreetMap (the Yellow Pages' site suggests data from it is "© 2016 - 2018 DataWorks"). Another is that you've added wikipedia and wikidata item... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-27 15:30:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Merhaba 58zarali,Buraya aktardığınız verilerin birtakım sorunları var. Birincisi, lisansın OpenStreetMap ile uyumlu olmadığı görülüyor (Yellow Pages'ın sitesinden veriler "© 2016 - 2018 DataWorks"). Bir diğeri, yanlış olan tek tek ürün sayfalar... | |
| 5 | 2018-05-28 05:09:59 UTC | katpatuka | Opet şirekti için çalıştın mı? Opet benzin istasyonlarının datası ile alaklı bir email varsa o zaman OSM viki'de belgelemek lazım. (Örnek: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Katpatuka/CDC_email_traffic ) | |
| 6 | 2018-05-29 17:32:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | @58zarali Please do answer the questions that other mappers are asking here. If you don't we'll have to revert this (not least because of the very odd keys used).Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSMs's Data Working Group. | |
| 7 | 2018-05-29 19:06:50 UTC | 58zarali | Hi Andy,I am a manager in the Digital Maps and Data Operations department at Yellow Pages Turkey.Turkey Yellow Pages has the right to use the data. As a company we provide branded digital maps service. So we installed Opet gas stations on OpenstreetMap.I agree, "fire_hydrant:brand"... | |
| 8 | 2018-06-05 22:29:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi 58zarali,(apologies for repeating some of what has previously been sent by email)It's probably worth taking a step back and reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and the pages linked from there such as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines . What I'd suggest ... | |
| 9 | 2018-06-16 09:57:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | One other thing to mention - the wikipedia, wikidata and website used in each item here are incorrect. For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4699023957 does _not_ have a wikipedia page (although the brand associated with the station does). This is something else that you can discuss with ... | |
| 10 | 2018-06-22 11:16:11 UTC | 58zarali | Hi Andy,Will the problem be solved by deleting "wikidata tr: Opet" tag from all locations?Example Location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4699023952Best,Yusuf | |
| 11 | 2018-06-22 15:42:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | There's a bit more to it than that, as I said above - I'd actually suggest discussing it on the imports list. | |
| 12 | 2018-06-22 18:31:46 UTC | 58zarali | If you can not make bulk edits, you can delete the entire list. | |
| 13 | 2018-06-30 10:22:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've removed the problematical key values in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60298600 (nodes) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60298840 (ways; there were no relations). The changes were:o Remove fire_hydrant:brando Change wikidata and wikipedia where set to brand:wikidata and... | |
| 14 | 2018-07-02 06:03:42 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | @SomeoneElse - thanks for the cleanup! | |
| 60216923 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-06-27 17:53:33 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | Are there really now three bicycle repair stations in York Railway Station?There is the one you have just added on Platform 1 www.openstreetmap.org/node/5723218370The one I surveyed last year next to all the bicycle parking on the platform no longer used for trainswww.openstreetmap.org/n... |
| 2 | 2018-06-27 19:39:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | I reckon that the one I added was actually yours. It didn't obviously look broken. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-04 23:23:37 UTC | GinaroZ | Would https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5723215607 not be better tagged as tourism=guest_house? | |
| 59615379 by doublah | 1 | 2018-06-26 13:51:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Just wondered why you'd added a series of no u-turn restrictions such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8360546 here - on that bit of road there's logically no way you'd try and do a U turn on the junction approach?Hope you don't mind me mentioning this... |
| 58552036 by oslim | 1 | 2018-05-10 18:03:17 UTC | PierZen | Not a valid motive to delete lines because this comes from an import. You should comment changeset and discuss with creators. I did a Overpass query for history. See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yHQLooking at way 212063753, I see that nodes correspond to poles on the Bing Imagery.You should rever... |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 15:58:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,At https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/0.18280/31.70850 you've deleted the power line https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256934918/history . That's actually still visible in the online imagery (a couple of different ones) there, both as a gap in the trees and as a series of pylons such as ... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-22 10:33:58 UTC | oslim | Hi Andy,I've indeed delete one power line, which was still existing. For this I'm sorry.But please understand, that the power grid was confusing due to the pre-existing import.With the same changeset I've massively expanded the new 220 kV grid of Uganda, only based on imagery.Greetin... | |
| 4 | 2018-06-22 15:44:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - the imported data did indeed look a bit rubbish! | |
| 59688019 by SomeoneElse2 | 1 | 2018-06-21 13:25:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Test comment |
| 2 | 2018-06-21 13:28:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Another test comment | |
| 34992820 by GerdP | 1 | 2018-06-20 21:30:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | "highway=gallop" probably isn't best described as "highway=bridleway" (though both are obviously designed for horses). I've tagged the ones near me as "track" (but with some kind of description) as it's the least worst option. It's a bit like trying to decide whether ... |
| 59799902 by Nigel Callaghan | 1 | 2018-06-14 15:31:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Has the English name changed here? When I was a kid it was always referred to in English as "Black Rock Sands", though the signage in Morfa Bychan was just a sign with "Traeth" written above "Beach". |
| 2 | 2018-07-08 19:01:24 UTC | trigpoint | No response so correcting from local knowledge. | |
| 59785000 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2018-06-12 17:58:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just to add a bit more detail about the way this data was tidied up:I've removed stuff that genuinely makes no sense (like "if_yes_whe") but have left e.g. "damage_description" since someone might be able to interpret that down the line. I've also left any new geometries, in c... |
| 55287374 by Steeley | 1 | 2018-06-11 10:52:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Surprised that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5328977855 was still open as a Phones4U in Jan this year - didn't the company fold in 2014? |
| 59712531 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-06-10 14:11:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just to summarise the changes here:o https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596114658 replaces https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7373542 , and it's previous outers form part of the new building way.o https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/297356 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505918020 and ... |
| 57781074 by Joe E | 1 | 2018-06-10 13:32:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Apologies if I've got the wrong changeset here, but this I think is the one that has set platform 9 as the default stop in York. just for info (most recently 2 weeks ago) I've caught it from platform 5a.Cheers,Andy |
| 59699399 by CoastalGenius | 1 | 2018-06-09 23:53:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've made http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=7233208 a "leisure=park" again. Are you sure about this? Other mappers seem quite clear that it isn't.Best Regards,Andy |
| 59345092 by CoastalGenius | 1 | 2018-06-08 08:41:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you don't reply to the questions that people have asked you (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=1193932 ) we're going to have to remove some or all of these changes. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591636288 looks pretty unlikely, for example. |
| 57080161 by Hans Wieser | 1 | 2018-05-31 09:52:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've changed the DE and EN names here from versions of the Ossetian names to versions of the Georgian names. Leaving aside the politics, what's the most spoken language on the ground here? Given the location I'd have expected Ossetian rather than Georgian?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-06-04 20:49:30 UTC | Hans Wieser | What means Ossetian version of German name or Ossetian version of English name? Ossetians are free to call places in Ossetian language but it's a nonsense that other languages also have to call them in Ossetian. DE and EN names show how German or English speakers could call a place not how locals ... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-04 23:32:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Not "Ossetian version of German name" but "German version of Ossetian name" (as opposed to "German version of Georgian name").I'm sure that there's no doubt what the name:ka and name:os versions are, but what is the source of name:de or name:en? If it's just a transl... | |
| 4 | 2018-06-06 09:51:42 UTC | Hans Wieser | So what you say (German version of Ossetian name) is wrong very wrong, if you check old Soviet topographic maps you will see that those names are international. Ossetians renamed everything only after the wars in 90s or in 2008. Main names of the settlements show Ossetian names because they are used... | |
| 58246857 by BogDan_Olegovich | 1 | 2018-04-27 12:18:08 UTC | chachafish | Hello, thank you for contributions. Quite a few of the roads you have added cross paths, but you did not add a connecting node. Can you review your edits and correct them? If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Thank you :) |
| 2 | 2018-05-24 19:12:43 UTC | BogDan_Olegovich | Hello! Thank you for flagging this, we found a bug and these issues are fixed. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-25 21:00:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | What was the bug? | |
| 4 | 2018-06-04 11:00:14 UTC | BogDan_Olegovich | Hello SomeoneElse, by bug I meant it was a mistake from our end, we missed on adding the connection nodes. Apologies for not being clear. I will make sure that this does not happen again. | |
| 5 | 2018-06-04 11:58:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | OK, thanks. | |
| 49758479 by Andy Joiner | 1 | 2018-06-02 13:18:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just wondered - is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4931632599 perhaps the same object as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3782675933 from the year before?If it helps, https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=21&lat=51.5711596&lon=-4.1061103 is a rendering that shows bo... |
| 59417367 by saritha kandhsamy | 1 | 2018-05-31 09:10:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592254750 but it's clear from the imagery that it's not _all_ building. The way to tag schools is "amenity=school" not "building=school".Best Regards,Andy |
| 57076529 by Ludmila Gladkova | 1 | 2018-04-09 23:52:13 UTC | JesseMerriam | This parking no longer exists. It has been dug up and is current a building under construction. I removed it when I ceased to exist. |
| 2 | 2018-05-31 09:01:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Ludmila,Are you going to fix the problem here or do you need someone else's help?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 59132002 by EdSS | 1 | 2018-05-31 08:58:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Does this parking lot actually exist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57076529 suggests not.Best Regards,Andy |
| 59353754 by kthor6060 | 1 | 2018-05-30 21:00:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!In this change you've deleted everything within quite a large area. I'm guessing that this might have been by mistake (it sometimes happens when people are trying to use OSM to create a personal map via "export" and don't realise they're deleting som... |
| 58396491 by geozeisig | 1 | 2018-04-25 06:59:33 UTC | highflyer74 | Moin geozeisig!Was hat Dich denn bewegt, weltweit aerodrome:type=military an die Militärplätze zu taggen? Gleiches gilt für die Segelflugplätze in Deutschland (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58396356). Das Tagging ist meiner Erkenntnis nach nie über den Proposal... |
| 2 | 2018-04-27 05:32:48 UTC | geozeisig | Ich hatte geplant anzuregen das Symbol für aerodrome:type=regional / gliding zu ändern. Dazu muss aber das tagging erst mal einheitlich sein. Denn erst ab einer gewissen Größenordnung fangen die an darüber nachzudenken. Die Änderung ist eher formal, die Eigenschaften... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-27 10:26:33 UTC | highflyer74 | Naja, für Diskussionen über bestimmte Tags gibt es die Tagging Mailingliste und wenn man die nicht kennt, kann man im sehr aktiven deutschen OSM Forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14) nachfragen. Ich glaube, Du unterschätzt die Problematik. Ich finde es ja gut, da... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-27 10:37:15 UTC | highflyer74 | Ich habe im Forum mal einen Thread eröffnet (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=696630), zu dem ich Dich gern einladen möchte. Vielleicht kann man gemeinsam eine Lösung finden. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-03 19:18:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | This looks like a bit of an overzealous mechanical edit to me - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1042032811 is presumably https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAF_Ballykelly and closed in 1971.How much checking did you give the rest of the data? | |
| 6 | 2018-05-29 12:24:45 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | I run a check due to request at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:aerodrome:type and I found that geozeisig removed at least 478 aerodrome tags since 2018-01-01.List is at https://gist.github.com/matkoniecz/23bd62764cac4ed81984bb1f8af52dc8 and I am currently running second check that ... | |
| 7 | 2018-05-29 15:03:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555781495 - it was an obvious mechanical edit made without checking (see comment above about RAF Ballykelly)- Andy | |
| 8 | 2018-05-29 15:53:04 UTC | highflyer74 | Hello all!Thanks for taking care of this. Also aerodrome:type=* had been added to hundreds of airports. This tag is far from being consistently defined and should also not be added as a mass edit. This had been reported to DWG and addressed on the forum with little to no concern, so I just let i... | |
| 9 | 2018-05-29 20:36:04 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | And other variant of search - https://gist.github.com/matkoniecz/23bd62764cac4ed81984bb1f8af52dc8#file-better-log - found 514 removals. | |
| 10 | 2018-05-29 20:38:49 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | "This had been reported to DWG and addressed on the forum with little to no concern" - maybe with clear evidence of mass scale it will go better? You can also mention that I volunteer for readding removed aerodrome tags (DWG probably has long queue of people that added copyright-violating ... | |
| 58084352 by Irina Karachevtseva | 1 | 2018-04-15 16:55:53 UTC | chachafish | Hello, when you create a road that crosses a path, they must be joined by a node. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. |
| 2 | 2018-04-27 12:25:09 UTC | chachafish | Hello, thank you for contributions. Quite a few of the roads you have added cross paths, but you did not add a connecting node. Can you review your edits and correct them? If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Thank you :) | |
| 3 | 2018-05-25 04:19:07 UTC | Irina Karachevtseva | Hello! Thank you for flagging this, we found a bug and these issues are fixed. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-25 07:04:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | What do you mean by "we found a bug"? | |
| 5 | 2018-05-29 09:34:49 UTC | Irina Karachevtseva | Corrected the intersection of the line | |
| 58522164 by erantr1 | 1 | 2018-04-29 10:13:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What is "source=Field Test"? Can you explain the source of the oneway change on e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584351065/history please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-05-06 08:40:31 UTC | erantr1 | Sorry, I meant Survey. All these changes were validated on-ground.Thanks for noticing.All the best,Eran. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-10 10:31:50 UTC | rebeccadavey | Hi,I believe that the node order for one of the parallel one-way sections of Farringdon Road near Kings Cross is now incorrect. The more southerly of the two branches (way 547168300) has a one-way direction heading northwest, whereas the node order now reflects a one-way direction going southeast.... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-21 13:10:46 UTC | erantr1 | Hi Rebecca,I looked at that way ID, but as far as I can see the node order goes NW, exactly like the one-way direction.Unless I'm missing something here.Thanks,Eran. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-21 13:25:13 UTC | rebeccadavey | Hi Eran,This was my mistake, I apologise! I thought the data I was using was up-to-date, but it wasn't and didn't include your change/fix.Thanks for your help,Rebecca | |
| 6 | 2018-05-21 13:47:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just in case it helps anyone in the future, https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=22&lat=51.526308&lon=-0.1128025 will show arrows and allow you to zoom in a bit more. | |
| 7 | 2018-05-22 08:41:00 UTC | erantr1 | Thanks Andy!And no worries Rebecca :-) | |
| 39792198 by mcheckimport | 1 | 2018-05-21 12:17:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,A quick question about this import - what was it that governed the tagging? Take as an example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422772848/history#map=19/40.62698/16.78819 . That's since been changed from man_made=chimney to building=yes, and looking at the imagery it certainly doesn't loo... |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 12:17:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Ciao,Una rapida domanda su questa importazione: cosa ha regolato il tagging? Prendi come esempio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422772848/history#map=19/40.62698/16.78819. Sembra che sia stato cambiato da man_made = chimney a building = yes, e guardando le immagini non sembra certo un camino.... | |
| 59129538 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-05-20 22:35:31 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | you are right, I put Liv the wrong side of the Viceroy, it is where the dolls house shop was, I have moved it there now |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 00:10:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! | |
| 58999529 by Greg73E | 1 | 2018-05-16 12:13:50 UTC | lefty74 | This deletion removed a large part of the north boundary of the River Thames relation. The way should be restored and the nonexistent footpath removed by changing tags where needed.I'd prefer to leave this to the @Greg73E as he has local knowledge. |
| 2 | 2018-05-16 13:29:26 UTC | Greg73E | I think I'm in over my head here. Can the way be undeleted? I used the OSM web site editor. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-16 14:34:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59020134 as requested in https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/63508/help-revert-changeset-58999529 . | |
| 4 | 2018-05-16 14:43:34 UTC | ecatmur | Removed spurious tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59020549 . Reviewing other edits by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/FrenchSuit/history | |
| 59004631 by Donaldtrumpp | 1 | 2018-05-16 09:06:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Donaldtrumpp, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I'm guessing by your edits that your part of the same organisation mapping service roads as http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ravsjith ? If so, it'd be great if you could update your details on OSM in the same way.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58975935 by charabor | 1 | 2018-05-15 22:59:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What does "removing issue segment" mean here? The current relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7390605/history doesn't make any sense - there's a "to" and a "via" but no "from".Best Regards,Andy |
| 58500784 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2018-04-28 23:31:04 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 56324492, 56324700, 56324739, 56324971, 56325089, 56325106, 56325132, 56325160, 56325188, 56325491, 56325552, 56351058, 56351143, 56351268, 56351372, 56351413, 56351517, 56351961, 56352022, 56352105, 56352315, 56352356, 56352469, 56352540, ... |
| 2 | 2018-05-12 19:16:40 UTC | bryceco | It looks like this revert destroyed data that existed prior to the changeset being reverted. For example the area around this node had ways deleted leaving orphaned nodes behind: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1725944920/history | |
| 3 | 2018-05-14 07:59:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | @bryceco Thanks for letting me know about the orphaned nodes here. What actually happened was that this user deleted these nodes (and the connected ways) as part of their changes and for some reason the revert was unable to restore the ways along with the nodes (likely a dependancy on some other no... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-15 00:04:15 UTC | bryceco | Sorry, I didn't notice that the way was previously deleted. Does the revert tool provide diagnostics when a revert partially fails? It would be great to have a note created at the location indicating it needs attention. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-15 07:27:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | @bryceco It does, but there were 9962 lines in the revert log that could need a note based on that, and I suspect adding 10k notes suggesting that "local people please to check this" might be frowned upon. Most of those were "can't revert because someone has already corrected the dat... | |
| 47099558 by Krisstimata | 1 | 2017-03-23 16:21:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've accidentally uploaded the "learnosm" test data in the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset :)I'll delete it...Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-05-10 08:16:50 UTC | alesarrett | Hi, the trees in Palma de Mallorca have the tag "name" filled with "platanero". I think that should not be the place for that information, but instead the tag "species" with "species=es", see examples at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree | |
| 3 | 2018-05-12 12:04:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | @alesarrett - this mapper hasn't been active for a year. If there's anything that needs fixing and you can fix it yourself, I'd do that.If on the other hand there is anything that you need help with, drop the data working group an email via data@osmfoundation.org .Best Regards, Andy (from the... | |
| 58755050 by Adamant1 | 1 | 2018-05-10 21:24:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for fixing! |
| 57636889 by erantr1 | 1 | 2018-03-29 18:24:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Can you explain what "split ways and removed turn restriction" means here? Also what's the source of the change?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-05-06 08:45:46 UTC | erantr1 | Hi Andy,I received an update about construction work in this part of the street and thought it would be a good idea to split in order to adapt it for the upcoming change. In any case, I can revert it if you think it's necessary. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-06 09:24:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | That doesn't explain the turn restriction https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3086416/history which was at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1312264600 ? | |
| 4 | 2018-05-07 10:39:45 UTC | erantr1 | Hi Andy,Regarding the turn restriction - I had to refresh my memory to realize why I removed it. The restriction (only_straight_on) was defined from way 230192075 to way 183555228. I was mistaken to think that it is defined from 183555228 to 230191864, which would have created a non-justified dead... | |
| 55500670 by erantr1 | 1 | 2018-01-20 15:53:58 UTC | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi erantr1,Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I've noticed that you have changed street names to the abbreviated form. It was 16th Street Northwest but you changed it to 16th St NW. Please do not shorten the long street names. The wiki says: "If the name can be spelled without an... |
| 2 | 2018-01-21 08:48:58 UTC | erantr1 | Hey,yes, my colleague already told me I shouldn't do it. Sorry about that.Thanks for commenting!Eran. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-29 18:19:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Eran,Can you tell us who you are working for? The "my colleague" comment above suggests that you might be working for someone.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2018-05-06 08:47:14 UTC | erantr1 | Hi Andy,I answered you in a private message.Thanks,Eran. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-06 09:19:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Eran,I'd suggest that you add details of who you're working for to your OSM profile (your PM to me says that you are working for someone but doesn't say who). Currently there's no information on your OSM profile at all. To pick an example of how other comapnies tend to do this, here's a som... | |
| 6 | 2018-05-07 10:46:50 UTC | erantr1 | thanks for the suggestion, Andy. We will consider it. | |
| 53387623 by FreedSky | 1 | 2017-10-31 08:38:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello FreedSky,Please use changeset comments for your edits http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/FreedSky/history explaining what you're changing and what the source is. Changes to national borders, especially where there are multiple claims, should be clearer so that all relevant parties have a cha... |
| 2 | 2017-10-31 08:39:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | 你好FreedSky，http：//www.openstreetmap.org/user/FreedSky/history说明您正在改变的内容以及来源是什么。 对国界的变化，特别是多方面的要求应该更清楚，所有有关方面都有机会看看和评论所做的改变。OpenStreetMap，所以请说明你的修改... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-09 16:11:07 UTC | FreedSky | I made some revisions based on the boundary data and actual satellite imagery. There are some discrepancies in the frontier. Of course, my guess may be wrong, but I try my best to be neutral. My amendment to this large boundary Is based on this logic, so nothing to say, I do not like to write a reas... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-09 16:11:46 UTC | FreedSky | The source is based on the data from China's official mapping bureau, and their boundary data can be consulted for comparison. | |
| 5 | 2018-02-09 17:03:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | There are two potential issues with that:1) What's the licences associated with "data from China's official mapping bureau"? Is it compatible with OpenStreetMap?2) Where this impacts the boundaries of other states there could be problems. A number of states in this region have overla... | |
| 6 | 2018-05-05 08:34:19 UTC | FreedSky | My modification of the boundary is a feeling that some places are inconsistent with actual control. For example, some ravines are clearly in one of the countries and there are roads leading to them. If you don't think this is acceptable, you can discuss or return my editor. | |
| 7 | 2018-05-05 08:35:33 UTC | FreedSky | I also understand the specific conditions of the disputed areas between the two countries. Please rest assured that I will not arbitrarily modify the actual control boundary. As a user editing in the South China Sea, I know how tortured the boundary is. | |
| 8 | 2018-05-05 08:39:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for the detailed explanation. Sometimes it might make sense to add something like that to your own changesets (because the changeset comment is limited to 256 characters) to explain the reasoning behind it. | |
| 9 | 2018-05-10 03:15:03 UTC | FreedSky | I also know that you are worried that, in fact, you can find that my series of boundary editors basically does not involve the disputed areas. It is just some of the borders identified by the existing two countries. The data used before OSM may be a bit error. | |
| 58658493 by ڕاستی | 1 | 2018-05-04 10:51:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, Rather than just saying "Fixed name" can you please explain the change in more detail? As can be seen from http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=2969761 different people have different ideas about what the name of this place should be.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58661941 by meganswatragh | 1 | 2018-05-03 22:07:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello meganswatragh,You may not be aware, but when you edit OpenStreetMap you're editing a map that everyone can see, not just your personal copy. Please do continue editing, but please do only add things that are verifiable on the ground. If you want to add a personal bookmark to MAPS.ME you can ... |
| 2 | 2018-05-08 19:05:00 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58797616 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some remaining unlikely ATMs, mostly in Northern Ireland. | |
| 58574027 by corb555 | 1 | 2018-05-02 22:19:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello corb555,Can you please add a bit more useful to each changeset rather than just "fixed road"?Best Regards,Andy |
| 57667431 by Shouptech | 1 | 2018-05-02 22:10:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OSM!Just for info - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574821941 should really have a joining node with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216269582 , so that a router can direct you between the sidewalk and the alley and vice versa. Hope you don't mind me mentioning this; ju... |
| 58363452 by upendrakarukonda | 1 | 2018-04-27 19:43:24 UTC | GITNE | Please do not add `addr:postcode` tags to `highway`s. What you meant to add was the `postal_code` tag. `addr:postcode` is for specifying address information on buildings and facilities only. Please use the `postal_code` tag. |
| 2 | 2018-04-27 20:07:04 UTC | GITNE | Btw, asking out of pure curiosity: Since when has been Bing Streetside licensed for use in OpenStreetMap? | |
| 3 | 2018-04-27 20:37:33 UTC | iandees | It isn't. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-27 20:39:44 UTC | bhousel | hey GITNE, Mapbox has an agreement which allows Bing Streetside sourced detections to be used for contributions to OSM. Some more information is available here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/daniel-j-h/diary/43242and https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/349 | |
| 5 | 2018-04-28 11:16:21 UTC | GITNE | @iandees @bhousel Thank you for the clarification. On a short note, I do not know what to think of it in terms for the OSM community but it is perfectly legal. | |
| 6 | 2018-04-29 18:39:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | @bhousel It would help to document the process in the wiki, I think - neither https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/daniel-j-h/diary/43242 nor https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/349 explain things very well. Is the imagery only available by licence to Mapbox employees? Are the results of the im... | |
| 58378215 by Constantinum | 1 | 2018-04-29 05:36:48 UTC | chachafish | Hello, thank you for your additions to OSM. Many roads you added in Denver do not exist. You are using old imagery. You created roads directly through buildings, which are clearly mapped. Please use the most current imagery when mapping. Thank you. |
| 2 | 2018-04-29 13:24:20 UTC | Witcher_UA | Hello. And thanks for the comment. For all of geometry, I added, I used Mapbox imagery. These imagery are the latest available in JOSM. I checked that some geometries do not exist in Google Maps 2018, but for legal reasons, I can not use it in JOSM. Thank you. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-29 18:25:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Witcher_UA - are you the same person as @Constantinum ? | |
| 4 | 2018-04-29 18:35:40 UTC | freebeer | Hallo Witcher,Why are you replying in the first person to a changeset by user Constantium, who is presently blocked from OSM for failing to give a satisfactory reply where organisational details are needed to be provided? Blocks are to be taken seriously, not to be treated as an annoyance to be i... | |
| 5 | 2018-06-06 09:08:17 UTC | Witcher_UA | Hello, and sorry for the late reply. Witcher_UA it's my second account that was created when I had auth problem with my main one. As far as I know there is no opportunity to delete Witcher_UA as I want it to. I'm sorry that I create so much problem with this. Now I'm understand about out-of-date ima... | |
| 6 | 2018-06-06 09:09:35 UTC | Constantinum | Hello, and sorry for the late reply. Witcher_UA it's my second account that was created when I had auth problem with my main one. As far as I know there is no opportunity to delete Witcher_UA as I want it to. I'm sorry that I create so much problem with this. Now I'm understand about out-of-date ima... | |
| 7 | 2018-06-06 10:40:30 UTC | freebeer | Hallo Ko(n?)styantyn, thanks for replying.Please note that OpenStreetMap also places great value on the Open part, both in being open to communication, as well as being about about how one works, including sources.The changeset comment allows you up to 255 characters, and I often use most of the... | |
| 8 | 2018-06-06 12:41:09 UTC | Adamant1 | I just wanted to mention that there was a thing in the newsletter (I think that was the source at least) that Microsoft has given us permission to use their street level imagery for mapping. Its a really good reference to use in places like where the note is California Freebeer mentioned that are co... | |
| 58529966 by erantr1 | 1 | 2018-04-29 16:15:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello again erantr1,In https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1819 I asked you to answer the questions that people were asking you at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7154587 . It looks like you're still not doing that - there are a number of questions that need answ... |
| 2 | 2018-04-29 16:17:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | To be absolutely clear about how to reply:Click the changeset number at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7154587 .Click in the empty box below the discussion.Type in your answer.Click "Comment".(although as you have replied to some before, you presum... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-06 08:49:23 UTC | erantr1 | Hello Andy,As you mentioned yourself, I have answered and addressed several issues raised in the past. I answered the other pending questions now.Thanks,Eran. | |
| 58506260 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2018-04-28 16:02:59 UTC | carciofo | Hi, roads were deleted in this changeset, but their constituent nodes were not, so that what remains are unconnected untagged roads... |
| 2 | 2018-04-28 16:09:19 UTC | carciofo | *unconnected untagged nodes | |
| 3 | 2018-04-28 17:10:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - can you show where? These mappers seem to have been working in teams, so there might be a few places. Obviously I'll check myself, but if you let me know where you're seeing it it'll save time. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-28 17:26:39 UTC | carciofo | Hi, I was mapping in north Broward County, FL, and noticed the nodes. It seems both nodes and ways were originally created in the same changeset as both are/were v1. This is a small example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=57250325#map=17/26.28700/-80.18459. Cheers | |
| 5 | 2018-04-28 23:31:01 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 56324492, 56324700, 56324739, 56324971, 56325089, 56325106, 56325132, 56325160, 56325188, 56325491, 56325552, 56351058, 56351143, 56351268, 56351372, 56351413, 56351517, 56351961, 56352022, 56352105, 56352315, 56352356, 56352469, 56352540, ... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-28 23:44:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | @carciofo The unconnected nodes at your example location have now gone (it took a while for the revert to complete) but if you see anywhere else showing that problem, please get in touch. | |
| 58496058 by Andreyhmk | 1 | 2018-04-28 09:45:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what the licence associated with "Bing Streetside Imagery" is please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 07:19:07 UTC | Andreyhmk | Hello Andy! We use the data "Mapbox ML Detections from the Streetside & Mapbox Satellite"Best Regards,Andrew | |
| 58413654 by meganswatragh | 1 | 2018-04-26 12:33:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Is "Rally Finish" really a caravan site, or are you just trying to make a personal map? If it's not, you might find https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ useful - you can add any markers you like in there that you want.You may not be aware, but when you ... |
| 2 | 2018-05-08 19:05:05 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58797616 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some remaining unlikely ATMs, mostly in Northern Ireland. | |
| 57981782 by Constantinum | 1 | 2018-04-24 15:52:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,All of your changesets have the comment "adding parking". Can you please provide a bit more detail about what you're adding to OSM?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-24 16:28:48 UTC | Constantinum | Hello,I adding and editing geometry of parking in this area.Best Regards,Kostyantyn | |
| 3 | 2018-04-24 16:34:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Thanks for getting in touch. Is someone directing you where and how to add parking? If so, we'd like to get in touch with them. There have been a number of groups of people being asked to make these sorts of changes (sometimes in error) and we'd like to explain to them some of the problem... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-16 05:16:14 UTC | Constantinum | Hello, and sorry for the late reply. I'm a part of [GISua](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GISua) team. Please send any general feedback on [GISua's](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GISua) work on OpenStreetMap to [Vladimir Ovramenko](https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Vladimir Ovramenko) or... | |
| 5 | 2018-05-24 17:57:48 UTC | Constantinum | Hello again Andy, thank you for letting us know. From here on we'll be more descriptive in our changeset comments.Best Regards, Kostyantyn | |
| 58377634 by Constantinum | 1 | 2018-04-24 15:47:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.You appear to be using orphan nodes added by another mapper here. Can you explain what is going on?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-24 15:48:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Привіт і ласкаво просимо до OpenStreetMap.Ви, схоже, використовуєте сирі вузли, додані іншим картографом тут. Чи можете ви пояснити, що відбувається?З найкращими побажа... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-24 16:29:09 UTC | Constantinum | Hello,I adding and editing geometry of parking in this area. Previous mapper maybe wanted to add roads on the parking lots, but add only orphan nodes. I just finished her work.Best Regards,Kostyantyn | |
| 58332320 by Premsakhare | 1 | 2018-04-24 10:16:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582837445 connects all the way through and there isn't a fence part-way down it? |
| 58361628 by Andreyhmk | 1 | 2018-04-24 10:09:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've called this changeset "adding parking" yet there are lots of way deletions in here too.Can you explain what you're doing here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-05-14 07:37:45 UTC | Andreyhmk | Hello, called the package of edits "the addition of parking lots" and corrected what was incorrectly de-indexed. | |
| 58325994 by Beckham David | 1 | 2018-04-24 10:03:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've said "gave access as private" (presumably for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582756171 ) but that doesn't seem to have been done? |
| 58359338 by MargamV10 | 1 | 2018-04-24 09:52:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583082631 is actually a service road and not just a wide cycleway or footway?Best Regards,Andy |
| 58363672 by Jonathon_9889 | 1 | 2018-04-24 09:47:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583124717 is residential? It looks just like a parking aisle to me.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58364553 by afresh | 1 | 2018-04-24 09:42:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is way 58364553 also called Blinn Avenue? The things it joins to at each end are called that.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58363542 by kirusucud | 1 | 2018-04-24 08:22:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583124126 really a residential road? It just looks like someone's driveway to me.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58362596 by adam_philips | 1 | 2018-04-24 08:00:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583117297 is an unclassified road? It really doesn't look like anything much. What source did you use here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-24 09:22:01 UTC | adam_philips | Hi Andy,I have put that by mistake.It's actually a drive way.I have made the necessary changes. Thank you for stopping by,Adam. | |
| 58363296 by Zoey Ann | 1 | 2018-04-24 07:44:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that there is access all the way down https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583122617 ? It looks like there might be a wall near the fire department. |
| 57636274 by EgrettaGarzetta | 1 | 2018-03-30 20:53:19 UTC | chillly | Errrr, surely the website is copyright. DO you have permission to use this in OSM? We take copyright VERY seriously |
| 2 | 2018-03-30 23:14:37 UTC | EgrettaGarzetta | I understand that, a little better today than yesterday; but does that mean the names of the hostels can't be used without permission or does it mean they can't be used because they're copyright? | |
| 3 | 2018-03-31 11:30:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | @EgrettaGarzetta OSM would need data released under an appropriate licence in order to be able to use it. There's some information at https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright . There's more information over at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import , and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Impo... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-23 19:58:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | As I read the thread at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-April/thread.html#21270 , YHA haven't given permission for this data to be used. Are you still working to get that permission? | |
| 57918111 by Victoria1901 | 1 | 2018-04-13 07:11:01 UTC | chachafish | Hello, you seem to have added thousands of untagged lines and nodes in your changesets. Are these supposed to represent something? |
| 2 | 2018-04-23 08:15:53 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Do you think that we should wait or delete ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577813798#map=18/33.09372/-117.21442 ? Given id=502903 I suspect that it is poorly done import of unclear data from unknown source (maybe copyrighted on top of that). | |
| 3 | 2018-04-23 09:21:55 UTC | chachafish | The creator of this changeset does not communicate. I recommend this be reverted. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-23 13:10:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Mateusz @chachafish I'm happy to help with a revert (and I'll also mention it to @woodpeck who gave the 0-hour block mesage), but what it'd be really useful to know would be which changesets out of the 30 need to be reverted? Some do look OK at first glance; some (like this one) definitely do not.... | |
| 5 | 2018-04-23 13:45:07 UTC | chachafish | Hi, and thanks for the help. I agree, some of the changesets do look okay. The only changesets that seem to be wildly incorrect are:57918111and57914505 It would be great to see them reverted. Other edits by this group of mappers have some mistakes and are a bit sloppy, but I'm able to stay o... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-23 17:51:17 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Given that it is not a newbie user trying to start with OSM but somebody trying to make import in the really poor way I am tempted to revert everything due to copyright concerns. | |
| 7 | 2018-04-23 19:42:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've reverted the two "unconnected node" changesets in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58348196 . Another mapper (possibly "on the same team") had already deleted some of the extraneaous stuff in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58342443 .Best Regards,Andy | |
| 8 | 2018-04-24 01:48:26 UTC | chachafish | Cheers! Thanks for your help :) | |
| 58342443 by Andreyhmk | 1 | 2018-04-23 18:52:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've called this changeset "adding parking" yet there are lots of way deletions in here too.Can you explain what you're doing here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-05-14 07:41:47 UTC | Andreyhmk | Hello, called the package of edits "the addition of parking lots" and corrected what was incorrectly de-indexed. | |
| 58326868 by johnny_rhodes | 1 | 2018-04-23 07:10:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582765686 is residential? It looks more like a parking_aisle to me.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58326997 by chichao | 1 | 2018-04-23 07:04:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just for info - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582768372 looks like a "service=parking_aisle" from the imagery.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58327530 by Beckham David | 1 | 2018-04-23 06:58:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Looking at the imagery, I don't think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582781017 has a corner at the south end that points west. It's in the shadows, but I'd imagine that it'd just go due south down to Beverly Park Way.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58327606 by MargamV10 | 1 | 2018-04-23 06:51:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582781701 is residential rather than a service road? It looks like just access to 1 or 2 properties to me.Best Regards,Andy |
| 58253682 by kirusucud | 1 | 2018-04-23 06:31:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just checking - is there really no access from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581800559 to the school itself? It seems odd that people at the school would have to walk to the main road and then go back into the parking area?Best Regards,Andy |
| 58278656 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-04-22 11:37:01 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | is www.openstreetmap.org/way/582066515a footpath? It doesn't appear to be tagged |
| 2 | 2018-04-22 11:37:35 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | sorry www.openstreetmap.org/way/582066515 (missed out a space) | |
| 3 | 2018-04-22 14:00:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | I don't know yet! There's a stile at the east end with a Millennium Way sign pointing west down the stray, but I don't know yet where there next sign is, or if there's a defined path down there. | |
| 58265709 by Marc Konjuhi | 1 | 2018-04-21 01:03:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any reason for switching the name order from "SR / SQ" to "SQ / SR" for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1907401314/history ? I believe it was "SR / SQ" before because it was in a Serb-speaking-majority area. |
| 2 | 2018-04-21 17:50:31 UTC | Marc Konjuhi | I thought I made a compromise with somebpody about this, but we made it different so I made a mistake there. I will reset the serb municipalities to SR / AL.Thanks for your help. | |
| 57959427 by sonmanek | 1 | 2018-04-11 19:36:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Manek Sonu,Can you explain why you've changed the way here to a footpath? Previously the source included "survey" - are you saying that the previous mapper was wrong, or what?Also all the other footpaths here are cycleable. How do you know that this one isn't?Best Regards,A... |
| 2 | 2018-04-17 08:08:50 UTC | sonmanek | hello andy,thanks for bringing this to me.I should have kept the access of bicycle=yes instead of unspecified.Best Regards,Manek Sonu | |
| 3 | 2018-04-17 12:27:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain why you've changed the way here to a footpath?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2018-04-18 22:24:01 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57960898 by premtemp2 | 1 | 2018-04-17 09:37:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain the reason for the deletion of the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5583605/history here please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 57960469 by counter_striker | 1 | 2018-04-10 06:47:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello counter_striker,What was the source of the changes here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 07:47:16 UTC | counter_striker | I have used the street sign at the entrance of Broughton street to change the access. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 12:02:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Where did you see the street sign? | |
| 4 | 2018-04-13 08:14:40 UTC | counter_striker | Please turn on the - Traffic Sign Overlay (Mapillary) then you'll see the sign between the nodes(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3426585989 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3561544523) | |
| 5 | 2018-04-13 09:17:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | That's from November 2016 though - are you sure it is still accurate? The person who took the photo looks like they might be an OSM mapper - maybe ask them or leave an OSM note so that someone local to the area can check? There are lots of mappers in Edinburgh - if a note appears it normally gets ... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-13 09:24:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Looking a bit closer - it's probably related to the changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51851320 (by the same person that took the mapillary photo). I've asked there.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 7 | 2018-04-13 09:41:50 UTC | drnoble | This road has been open for some time. I've made a few updates to the temporary arrangements based on the current state | |
| 8 | 2018-04-13 09:44:14 UTC | drnoble | Note also that the tram on York Place has been operational for several years now, and the extension down Leith Walk isn't yet approved.The construction work here relates to the redevelopment of Picardy Place as part of the ongoing St James Centre redevelopment | |
| 9 | 2018-04-13 09:54:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | @drnoble brilliant, thanks! | |
| 10 | 2018-04-13 09:58:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | @counter_striker - where is the iD that you are using hosted? It says you're using 2.4.1, but the current osm.org version is version 2.7.1. | |
| 11 | 2018-04-13 10:47:40 UTC | counter_striker | I am unaware about this version thing. could you please throw some light on it. | |
| 12 | 2018-04-13 11:27:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you click the "Edit" button above ^^ you'll get iD 2.7.1. What website are you looking at before you go into the iD editor? | |
| 13 | 2018-04-14 21:54:10 UTC | counter_striker | Actually, I am not seeing any iD. It is simply navigating into the edit window. All I see is "Zoom in to edit"PS: I have always been logged in. I hope that's not an issue. | |
| 14 | 2018-04-14 22:31:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | "iD" is the name of the editor. Move the mouse to the bottom right hand corner of the window of the latest version and it says "What's new in iD 2.7.1".The question, though, is what site are you on before you start editing OSM data? It's clearly not this one... | |
| 15 | 2018-04-16 00:54:05 UTC | counter_striker | Okay. I understood. I am seeing iD 2.7.1 and its taking me to another page(https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD) when clicked. | |
| 16 | 2018-04-16 08:57:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks.That doesn't explain why all your changesets show "iD 2.4.1" though. Which website are you using that starts iD 2.4.1 for you? | |
| 17 | 2018-04-16 10:25:36 UTC | counter_striker | I am using Open Street Map website(https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=57960469#map=19/55.95623/-3.18722)Not sure about the iD 2.4.1. I might have to recheck my changesets once. | |
| 18 | 2018-04-16 10:28:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | > I am using Open Street Map websiteUnfortunately, I don't believe that you are.Either you're using some sort of captive portal that points www.openstreetmap.org somewhere else, or you're not being entirely honest with us here. | |
| 19 | 2018-04-16 10:51:19 UTC | counter_striker | Well, I would have shared my screen if there was an option to. Tell me if something is going wrong from my end. And also suggest me to have my iD as 2.7.1. Thanks. | |
| 20 | 2018-04-16 11:09:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes - posting a screenshot at an image sharing site might help.In the meantime though, can't you just tell us who is asking you to make these edits? We'd like to help them understand a bit more about OSM, but can't do that if we don't know who they are. | |
| 21 | 2018-04-17 01:03:09 UTC | counter_striker | I have tried to see the iD. It's now 2.8.0. Let me remind you that, I am performing these edits on my own based on OSM wiki pages. I am jobless, trying to learn and contribute. | |
| 22 | 2018-04-17 08:13:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | We're grateful for your contributions, but would like to have answers to the questions raised above. A number of other mappers seem to be making the same mistakes as you did here, and it looks like you're editing based on requests from someone else. We'd like to help whoever that is more about OSM... | |
| 23 | 2018-04-18 22:24:32 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 58131019 by counter_striker | 1 | 2018-04-16 10:08:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello again,As discussed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57960469 you're still using iD 2.4.1 here. Can you explain why?Best Regards,Andy |
| 51851320 by drnoble | 1 | 2018-04-13 09:23:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Does it seem plausible that Broughton Street is (still) closed now, presumably related to the St James development? Someone's marked it as access=no based on a mapillary photo you took of the north end in 2016 (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57960469 ). This changeset suggests th... |
| 58027695 by counter_striker | 1 | 2018-04-12 08:10:10 UTC | Nakaner | Hi counter_striker,you seem to be part of a organized or commercial editing activity. Please add a note to your profile page at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/counter_striker (editable via https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/counter_striker/account) which states which company/organisation you... |
| 2 | 2018-04-13 08:19:17 UTC | counter_striker | Hello Nakaner, I am a gamer and I have started freelance mapping. I researched and found out OSM is the best of it. Hence, started my edits. I am jobless so cannot keep a company name. Pay and Software are too big things to discuss. I wish I have some workmates. But sadly I do not have any. I would ... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-13 09:03:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi counter_striker,You might find some of the links from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact helpful.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2018-04-13 09:10:30 UTC | counter_striker | Thank you for the link Mr.Andy. I am really glad to have contact channel information. | |
| 57793900 by counter_striker | 1 | 2018-04-09 12:41:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello counter_striker and welcome to OSM,"cars are seen on road" does not imply "Motor vehicle = yes". It might be any sort of access, including private.Please don't make changes like this based on guesswork.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 00:57:45 UTC | counter_striker | Changing the access to private as per your comment.Thanks for correcting me. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-10 06:47:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello counter_striker,It's not enough just to say "Thanks for correcting me" - you also need to explain why you make changes like this in future. You're still doing this - see for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57960469 .Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2018-04-13 08:23:23 UTC | counter_striker | I have been following the previous editors. I did not see anybody writing explanations for the edits. However, I am doing the edits based on the evidence(imagery). Looks like, OSM does not encourage new talents :( | |
| 5 | 2018-04-13 08:46:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello counter_striker,Thanks for your reply.OSM very much encourages new editors, but we'd definitely encourage you to map your local area first so that you can see how things look in aerial imagery relates to how they really are on the ground.Also, some of the places that you are mapping in (... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-13 08:54:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | One more thing - your edits seem to be part of a series of co-ordinated edits, some of which mappers have suggested might be in error. Some people in the OSM community have suspected that you're part of this group and are being paid to make these edits.If you make worldwide changes that are in er... | |
| 7 | 2018-04-14 21:55:30 UTC | counter_striker | I have updated my bio with my information. I hope all the prejudice got some clarity.Ragards. | |
| 8 | 2018-04-18 22:24:58 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 58025093 by veerasatya | 1 | 2018-04-12 07:39:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579127004 connect with the adjacent footway at all? |
| 2 | 2018-04-13 04:16:52 UTC | raju atava | i have created the way to the adjoining house.the footpath was created about an year ago by some one else...its not this "someone else" anyhoww..... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-13 04:21:18 UTC | raju atava | please let me know if my edits are contradicting with anything? if so, how? | |
| 4 | 2018-04-13 07:26:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | @raju atava - you've made one edit with that account - http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54586327 - and this account (ravsjith) has made 279 so far. Maybe you're the same person? (which is OK - in OSM many people have more than one account). | |
| 5 | 2018-04-13 07:32:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | There's nothing wrong with adding new things to the map - I just asked whether the footways connected or not. Are you familiar with the area?Incidentally, (@ravsjith), you can see the other changesets where users have asked questions at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid... | |
| 57957673 by pattamatta | 1 | 2018-04-12 09:57:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello pattamatta,Is there any reason why you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449139305/history here? Please note that there has been a lot of redevelopment here and the Bing aerial imagery is very out of date.Why did you choose to edit this road in Hucknall? Did someone give you a li... |
| 2 | 2018-04-13 00:33:13 UTC | pattamatta | Hi Andy,I remember editing this road and I am pretty sure I actually wanted to connect Titchfield Street and Torkard Way together. However I don't remember deleting any segment. My intention was to make a connection between the two roads which are now connected with a small footpath segment. If ... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-13 01:46:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | The point is that they actually don't connect - the Bing imagery is wrong. The Esri imagery is more up to date, but to do it properly you would need to actually go there. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-18 22:26:34 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57930779 by sonmanek | 1 | 2018-04-12 14:17:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure about the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83871869/history here? I can understand why you're confused that a road joins a bridleway, but how do you know that this is the road that is wrong, not the other one?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 21:08:14 UTC | robbieonsea | A cursory look at other sources such as Bing, OS_OpenData_Streetview & NLS OS:1:25K sources suggest this is a track/service road to an isolated place in the middle of the Welsh hillsides.Clearly bridleway is closer to reality than an unclassified road, although personally I would have made it ... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 23:09:32 UTC | trigpoint | I can add some local knowledge here, this is a track leading to a what looks like a derelict farm, it is not a bridleway although I do not know its legal status.The road labelled Mountain Track, some name tag abuse, is certainly not a bridleway. It is a track and based on experience the access=no ... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-18 22:25:04 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57308060 by Shiva theja ramishetty | 1 | 2018-04-12 13:06:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, Would it be possible to provide a bit more detail about what "improper road directionality and geometry" means please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 57994658 by veenabs | 1 | 2018-04-12 13:02:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello veenabs and welcome to OSM,What was the source of the "changed to one way" here? Are you just looking at imagery, or have you actually visited the area?Best Regards,Andy |
| 58029614 by Suchitra | 1 | 2018-04-12 12:15:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain the source of "Changed road Access information" here please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 58029885 by Raghavendra T | 1 | 2018-04-12 12:13:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain the change you made here? I don't understand what "not routable path" means.Best Regards,Andy |
| 57996984 by Raghavendra T | 1 | 2018-04-11 19:43:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Raghavendra T,Just wondered how you knew that this road should be one way?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 10:57:27 UTC | Raghavendra T | I have edited based on GPS traces | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 12:09:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Which GPS traces were these? | |
| 58021916 by Raghavendra T | 1 | 2018-04-12 06:15:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Raghavendra T,What was the source of the direction change here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 11:25:49 UTC | Raghavendra T | I have done based on GPS traces | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 12:08:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Where did you see the GPS traces? | |
| 58023538 by charabor | 1 | 2018-04-12 06:20:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello charabor,Why have you chnaged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23618254/history from living_street to residential? There's no reason why you can't have parking rules on a living street and no reason why people can't drive there, it's just a different sort of street.If you have got any qu... |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 06:37:42 UTC | charabor | If you check access for such street before my edits it was motor vehicle access=not specified,which restricts vehicle movement & the tag is ambiguous,since vehicle movement & mapillary data shows that vehicle is permitted I felt it should be modified. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 07:43:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | > If you check access for such street before my edits it was motor vehicle access=not specifiedWhere does it say that?If you have got any questions please do ask other mappers - don't just change a road from a type that you don't understand to one that you do. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-12 08:47:23 UTC | charabor | it was there in the living street bBEFORE I EDITED,thats why I updated the street attribute,please read the comment carefully before replying back.In case I have doubts I will definitely contact OSM members. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-12 08:58:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | > it was there in the living street bBEFORE I EDITED,I asked "where does it say that" and you didn't answer the question. Do you mean "in the online OSM editor that you are using", or something else?> please read the comment carefully before replying back.You're real... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-12 09:23:40 UTC | charabor | Yes,exactly. OSM editor,I meant that,you wish to know anything specific? | |
| 7 | 2018-04-12 11:59:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | For the record, there are at least a dozen different OSM editors. Your changeset details above suggests that you are using "iD", which is the default one.In order to be sure that your change from living_street to residential is correct, you'd need to survey it in person. You are just g... | |
| 8 | 2018-04-13 19:33:49 UTC | freebeer | Andy,the default newbie editor iD is not the one this user is using, as the few times I have fired up iD before it gets killed off, I see a much more recent one, and I don't know what URL would give me the ancient 2.4.1 which no doubt appears very different than what I can see..Charabor, you h... | |
| 9 | 2018-04-18 22:25:12 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57960018 by Godfather-DonCorleone | 1 | 2018-04-12 07:57:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,It looks like there's still a problem with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121746864 . It previously connected to a bus stop by mistake. It now joins Station Road but still connects to the bus stop by mistake.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:24:43 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57960473 by __thanos__ | 1 | 2018-04-12 07:53:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Why have you changed the access to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18619235/history ? The previous edit to this road makes it clear that access was based on bollard locations.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:24:11 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57926355 by charabor | 1 | 2018-04-09 12:33:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "fixed directions" means please?Also, what was the source of the change?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 03:03:40 UTC | charabor | acronym for changing bi-directional to oneway or vice versa. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 05:30:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | How did you know it needed changing? | |
| 4 | 2018-04-12 05:37:13 UTC | charabor | vehicle directions,traffic cams | |
| 5 | 2018-04-12 05:45:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | What was the licencw associated with that source? | |
| 6 | 2018-04-12 05:55:45 UTC | charabor | multiple sources in edit in browser you can find vehicle direction,mapillary data & also my frequent traveling colleagues who have prior experience of area visit. | |
| 7 | 2018-04-12 06:26:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Now it sounds like you're just making stuff up. Please link to a specific source of this specific change. Note that all changes to OSM have to be subject to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability . | |
| 8 | 2018-04-12 06:32:35 UTC | charabor | I think its pretty evident from simple vehicle directions in OSM itself, if you care to check that at least once instead of pointlessly arguing over the same thing,if in a street you see vehicles going in both directions in aerial imagery then most of the times its bidirectional. I don't understand ... | |
| 9 | 2018-04-12 06:43:17 UTC | charabor | I assure for the record that changes are made based on logic & evidence,if %age of human error is accounted for I think the corrections are at par with other mappers,hopefully we can all cooperate & do improve OSM data. | |
| 10 | 2018-04-18 22:24:07 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 58021937 by Suchitra | 1 | 2018-04-12 06:14:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Suchitra,What was the source of the access change here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 58024416 by veerasatya | 1 | 2018-04-12 06:07:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello ravsjith and welcome to OSM.Please use more meaningful changeset comments rather than just "added the missing roads" every time. What was the reason that you added these roads here? What was the source?Best Regards,Andy |
| 57994793 by Roshni_p6 | 1 | 2018-04-12 06:02:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Roshni_p6,Can you explain what "left restricted" means here?Also what was the source for your change?Best Regards,Andy |
| 57929974 by Premsakhare | 1 | 2018-04-09 09:29:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you explain why you made this change? The previous two editors of this way are both local to Derby, and are familiar with the area. Why do you think they are wrong? |
| 2 | 2018-04-09 09:32:59 UTC | will_p | How do you know Thorntree Lane is bidirectional? You clearly haven't visited the location. I can see from the aerial imagery that the road is very narrow, so it is likely to be oneway. Additionally the mapper who originally added the oneway did so after surveying the area on the ground.I recogni... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-09 11:50:11 UTC | kreuzschnabel | The German forum has just become concerned about these edits too. Maybe a mapping party being not aware that they are editing not in a playground sandbox but within a live database used by others in real time? | |
| 4 | 2018-04-09 11:58:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | @kreuzschnabel Could you drop the DWG a mail please? Just so that we have the full list of accounts involved.I don't think that it's a mapping party, as they appear to be working exclusively in business hours UTC+5. My guess is that some company is trying to "fix" OSM routing but doe... | |
| 5 | 2018-04-09 12:21:12 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Done. | |
| 6 | 2018-04-10 10:35:22 UTC | Dave Venables | This section is definitely oneway. No egress onto Morledge. Clear no entry sign at the western end of this short stretch of Thorntree Lane.Mirror image of the other end; one can enter Thorntree Lane from Saint Peter’s Street or Morledge but must leave via Exchange Street. Entry from Morle... | |
| 7 | 2018-04-11 17:45:04 UTC | Dave Venables | Entrances to Thorntree Lane from Morledge and Saint Peter's Street both now correctly show one way.I've added a note on Exchange Street as it is currently just marked as Pedestrian only and I suspect there is a limited and conditional use by vehicles exiting Thorntree Lane to get to Albert Street.... | |
| 8 | 2018-04-11 18:26:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Dave yes - I reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57999066 . | |
| 9 | 2018-04-18 22:26:50 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57099613 by sachinv | 1 | 2018-03-12 19:25:57 UTC | gappleto97 | Hey. Just letting you know that all your recent edits got flagged on OsmCha for "unknown iD instance". You might want to check your editor to make sure that this isn't a big deal. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbo... |
| 2 | 2018-04-11 12:28:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | @sachinv - which iD instance are you using? | |
| 57958636 by wolverine9696 | 1 | 2018-04-11 10:10:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello wolverine9696,Can you explain how it is possible to make the change that you have just made based on aerial imagery alone?That does not seem possible to me.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:27:07 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57960486 by nakamuraa | 1 | 2018-04-11 10:07:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello nakamuraa,Can you explain how it is possible to know the access rights here based on aerial imagery? Please don't just guess!Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:26:21 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57858851 by galithot | 1 | 2018-04-11 06:42:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1886 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1848 .No reason has yet been received for these access changes (this example is one of many). |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:24:55 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57586438 by galithot | 1 | 2018-03-28 21:28:09 UTC | paulbiv | It's not a 'feature' and it's not a service road. Whatever gave you that idea? It's a High Street, Roman road etc. Them previous classification of highway=pedestrian is far closer. Are you a an armchair mapper? On the ground wins ALWAYS in OSM. |
| 2 | 2018-03-30 09:29:38 UTC | galithot | Hi Paulbiv, I have done the edits based on the aerial imagery available. Apologies if that were not matching with the ground truth. Hence edited. Thanks for reverting my edits. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-30 09:45:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi galithot,Can you also explain why you made this change _here_? You are making changes in lots of geographically separated areas which suggests that you haven't actually visited the places in question. Are you part of some project, and if so, what is that?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behal... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-11 02:18:33 UTC | galithot | I have made the edit using Remote Mapping technique and following the instructions on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-11 06:32:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | @galithot Please answer the question. | |
| 6 | 2018-04-18 22:22:22 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57958692 by __thanos__ | 1 | 2018-04-10 06:41:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello __thanos__,Can you please explain what the source of the access changes here was?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:25:08 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57959923 by __thanos__ | 1 | 2018-04-10 06:38:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello __thanos__,Can you explain how the footpath joins the road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436161937 ? It seems to do so at a stile (see https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=18&lat=50.819913&lon=-1.558656 ), which seems very unlikely.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:24:05 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57588367 by sri_harsha | 1 | 2018-04-09 21:21:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any reason why you've deleted the big area of tarmac at the top of Cromford? Has the road layout changed?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-11 19:40:08 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further informatio... | |
| 57891178 by Dubistnurrum | 1 | 2018-04-09 21:16:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - you've added this by mistake in the middle of the Atlantic. Perhaps something went wrong in OsmAnd? |
| 57933856 by __thanos__ | 1 | 2018-04-09 12:45:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello __thanos__ and welcome to OSM,Can you explain the source of your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23415395/history please?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:27:09 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57930059 by Premsakhare | 1 | 2018-04-09 09:21:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | You have changed the highway=construction to a highway=residential here (but left the construction tag), and claim that you used Esri World Imagery, yet that imagery clearly shows the road as being still in construction.What is your source that the road is now complete? |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:22:34 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57812806 by yxoc | 1 | 2018-04-04 23:35:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - that bus route goes through the middle of the Atlantic? |
| 2 | 2018-04-05 06:03:19 UTC | yxoc | That is indeed quite unusual for a Paris urban bus line ;-) Thanks for having spotted this. If I am not mistaken you have already removed the bogus node, right ?Thanks -yxoc | |
| 3 | 2018-04-06 23:09:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes, I've already deleted it.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 57730892 by Syed Mujeeb | 1 | 2018-04-06 20:09:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Syed Mujeeb,Something's gone wrong here, I think. If you look at http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=57730892 which shows the new things added in a changeset in green you can see that a new "straight line" has been added by you.It might not have been anything you did wro... |
| 57650148 by musaib ali | 1 | 2018-04-06 19:44:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What was the source of the access changes in this changeset? As the roads have been left, the access rules make no sense.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:24:31 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57649779 by musaib ali | 1 | 2018-04-05 08:53:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/2956475/history is oneway at all? |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:26:10 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57456116 by JoseMayoral | 1 | 2018-04-04 23:27:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 57796737 by Syed Mujeeb | 1 | 2018-04-04 22:39:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35282553/history please? It looks like (as with many of your previous edits) you're just guessing without actually surveying properly at all. Given the aerial imagery that is available it's very unlikely that all of Lime Road... |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:26:08 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57796153 by yaswap | 1 | 2018-04-04 22:29:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello again yaswap,What's the source of the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24037112/history ? I suspect that it's unlikely to be unclassified, but how do you know that it's a footway and not something that allows perhaps cycle or horse access as well?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:22:21 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57618516 by Syed Mujeeb | 1 | 2018-04-03 12:44:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain why you removed the "private" tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452932832/history ? Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:26:26 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57649794 by Syed Mujeeb | 1 | 2018-04-02 20:06:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OSM!What prompted you to look at the ESRI imagery inside fmr RAF Leconfield and add http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574640753 there?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:26:28 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57701750 by Mrninja2001 | 1 | 2018-04-02 11:26:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Mrninja2001 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!One quick request - would it be possible to use more meaningful changeset comments? Currently you're using "............." which doesn't explain what you've changed and why. Something more helpful would be something like "re-traced ri... |
| 56982582 by yopaseopor | 1 | 2018-04-02 11:06:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello yopaseopor,As I understand it this edit removed some data from OSM which has now been re-added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57695251 . Are you happy about the current state of the data now - presumably what was missing has now been restored?Also - one more question - what do... |
| 2 | 2018-04-02 11:07:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | (en español)Hola yopaseopor,Según tengo entendido, esta edición eliminó algunos datos de OSM que ahora se han vuelto a agregar en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57695251. ¿Estás contento con el estado actual de los datos ahora, es de suponer que... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 21:57:31 UTC | yopaseopor | No, I think you misunderstood it. Read it. completely http://yopaseopor.blogspot.com.es/2018/04/no-no-estoy-contento-no-im-not-happy.html | |
| 57465607 by Flynn Marquardt | 1 | 2018-04-02 09:53:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what the change was here? "Fix boundary Moocco" doesn't really explain what you did. In particular, are the relation memberships on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29119691#map=13/35.8944/-5.3466 correct?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-03 06:38:30 UTC | Flynn Marquardt | Hi Andy,here is a longer description with typo correction:Fix boundary Morocco by by adding missing way 44630799 as inner.Longer explanation:- boundaries must close!- a changeset before my change left an unclosed/open border regarding Ceuta- I just (re) added the missing way to make to... | |
| 57708109 by JamesBourne | 1 | 2018-04-01 22:00:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Any reason you've added network=National_Rail to Darley Dale? To get on the national rail network you'd have to cross to the other platform at Matlock.Best Regards,AndyPS: I was sat in a queue at the level crossing earlier today while some old LMS coaches went past with a steam engine at... |
| 2 | 2018-04-02 09:23:09 UTC | JamesBourne | Andy,Thanks for the heads up - have ammended that to 'Peak Rail' and added usage=tourism tags to that line.RegardsJames | |
| 3 | 2018-04-02 09:28:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks James! | |
| 57730894 by ygudeti | 1 | 2018-04-02 08:58:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello ygudeti,Can you explain the reasoning behind http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575467466 please? What is the source that this and the adjacent flare are both in fact parking aisles? What is the source of the fact that the northern one is eastbound and the southern one westbound? In Bel... |
| 57683213 by JÉT | 1 | 2018-04-01 21:49:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for this - it's great to have contributions "from the inside" of industrial sites etc. However, would it be possible to use changeset comments that are a bit more descriptive? "ÉT" on every changeset doesn't really help anyone understand what's changed...Best Re... |
| 57717417 by jan_olieslagers | 1 | 2018-04-01 18:45:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Who's "we"?OSM's position on names is covered in the wiki here - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only . |
| 2 | 2018-04-01 19:09:50 UTC | jan_olieslagers | Thank you for chiming in, critically yet politely.I must admit that the "we" is a bit of "pluralis majestatis" - it really is my own personal opinion. Yet it is an opinion grown over the years, and over ample discussion.1) aerodromes should really not be nameless. There hav... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-01 19:22:02 UTC | JKHougaard | There already is an access=private tag. It is up to the data user to interpret and display the appropriate tags so that the end user (the pilot in your example) has the correct information.Frankly I do not agree with your story of a qualified pilot finding a random airstrip in OSM and deciding to ... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-01 19:28:14 UTC | jan_olieslagers | @JKHougaard: you are entirely right, we cannot be considered responsible for the interpretation of the data we present. Still, is that a sufficient reason to NOT give this particular field a "name=" tag? There are hundres of little airfields around Europe that are not in any official sourc... | |
| 5 | 2018-04-01 19:42:34 UTC | Hjart | My opinion is: Mappers inventing names is BAD. Airfields and other objects in OSM should be tagged with verifiable official names only. Anything else will eventually lead to confusion.Maps used by aviators should display the content of access tags. | |
| 6 | 2018-04-01 19:48:07 UTC | jan_olieslagers | @hjart: first of all my apologies for misspelling your id higher up. That said: surely an official name is to be preferred, but if there is none than it is better to do our best than to offer nothing at all. What name is given can be discussed, and edited, asnd changed, and changed again, but no nam... | |
| 7 | 2018-04-01 19:56:58 UTC | Hjart | I also think it's now time to remove "invented name" from other airstrips. I think you'll have to come up with better cope with nameless airstrips.No name is not bad and certainly not "the worst there can be".Not respecting access=private tags etc is worse. | |
| 8 | 2018-04-01 20:07:25 UTC | jan_olieslagers | There you are mixing up two points. On the one hand I am glad to agree that tags like "private=*" are very important, and should be respected. On the other hand I insist we cannot be TOO clear; so we should use all means available, and the "name=" is one and a very prominent one.... | |
| 9 | 2018-04-01 20:08:18 UTC | jan_olieslagers | And what do you mean with "better cope with nameless airstrips"? | |
| 10 | 2018-04-01 20:11:23 UTC | Hjart | I meant "you'll have to find better ways to cope with nameless airstrips". Inventing names for them is not good and will not prevent cases like the one you gave above. | |
| 11 | 2018-04-01 20:18:20 UTC | Hjart | I personally think a lot of people will disagree with adding "private" or "public", whatever to names of all aerodromes just to "clear" the way you describe. | |
| 12 | 2018-04-01 20:19:12 UTC | jan_olieslagers | Sorry, I really cannot agree. Are you really meaning to say that "name=" should only be tagged if an official source is given? If so, how do you define "official"? For an extreme example, what was the official source for the "name=" in node 2318851468 ? Are you really g... | |
| 13 | 2018-04-01 20:29:36 UTC | Hjart | Yes, I think that "name=" should be tagged only if the airstrip has an actual official name. I researched this airstrip and found that it's private and doesn't actually have an official name. I think inventing one is wrong.The node you mention can be verified by going to http://vscs.dk/b... | |
| 14 | 2018-04-01 20:38:05 UTC | jan_olieslagers | Again sorry, but you do nothing to convince me. There is nothing official about the source you mention. That this name has been invented by someone else does not make a difference, it is not an official name so it is an invented name - if I follow your reasoning.But you may find me an official s... | |
| 15 | 2018-04-01 20:43:22 UTC | jan_olieslagers | And may I also refer to the pointer by @SomeoneElse at the very beginning of this discussion: I could find nothing there to imply that only "official" names can be used. But the article seems to care little about aerodromes. | |
| 16 | 2018-04-01 20:46:53 UTC | Hjart | Nothing is being "hushed up" here. You invented this name even though you are not the owner or in any anyway affiliated with this particular airstrip, right? Just like you invented names for a gazillion other airstrips around the map?Please note that another mapper (apparently with more ... | |
| 17 | 2018-04-01 20:50:34 UTC | jan_olieslagers | What has "being the owner" to do here? Has only the owner the right to add a "name=*" tag?The arguments are becoming more and more remote, there must really be something dark behind it all. Why not call an apple an apple? Why not call an Airstrip in Slagelse an Airstrip in Slag... | |
| 18 | 2018-04-01 20:51:46 UTC | Hjart | @jan the link given by SomeoneElse says "If something really doesn't have a name, don't add a name to OpenStreetMap"This airstrip doesn't actually have a name, so don't add one. | |
| 19 | 2018-04-01 20:57:05 UTC | jan_olieslagers | You are only saying it does not have an "official" name. Again, a dog is a dog and a train is a train and an Airstrip in Stragelse is an Airstrip in Stragelse. Allow me to insist: what is so very wrong about giving this one airstrip a name, even if it is not offical? Your insistence - agai... | |
| 20 | 2018-04-01 20:58:27 UTC | Hjart | Another mapper removed the name you invented for this airstrip (because of lack of verifiability) and I've put the noname=yes tag back. Please respect it | |
| 21 | 2018-04-01 20:58:42 UTC | jan_olieslagers | (apologies for the typo - s/Stragelse/Slagelse/g) | |
| 22 | 2018-04-01 20:59:39 UTC | jan_olieslagers | Sorry, I won't - but I will not enter a reversal war either. | |
| 23 | 2018-04-01 21:03:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | @jan_olieslagers Any name for an object must be verifiable by other mappers - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability for details. Something that you made up isn't a name, it's just a description. | |
| 24 | 2018-04-01 21:11:29 UTC | jan_olieslagers | Thanks again, @SomeoneElse. Can it be verified that an apple is an apple? Can it be verified that an Airstrip in Slagelse is an Airstrip in Slagelse? May an apple be given the name "apple" May ... ?? | |
| 25 | 2018-04-01 23:58:18 UTC | Hjart | @jan, Please see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/62884/inventing-names-for-essentially-unnamed-private-airstrips | |
| 26 | 2018-04-07 19:27:26 UTC | JJIglesias | My Opinion: Any Airstrip to be "legal" needs some kind of approval by the Aeronautical Authorities; and that Authority publish the location of each one of those airstrips, with certain characterists like longines and orientation of the airstrip. Name is NOT mandatory, but lenght, orientati... | |
| 27 | 2018-04-07 19:43:46 UTC | jan_olieslagers | Thanks, @JJIglesias. I have resigned to the existence of aerodromes with no name, though it feels to me like "a pub with no beer" :) And I certainly agree that we are NOT producing the AIP or any other official kind of data. However I cannot agree with you that all aerodromes (in the broad... | |
| 57638893 by EgrettaGarzetta | 1 | 2018-03-29 20:54:55 UTC | ndm | OpenStreetmap is about what is actually present -- you shouldn't change names that are from on-the-ground surveys.Plus, you would have to have a licence from YHA to use their copyrighted material on OpenStreetmap. |
| 2 | 2018-03-29 21:02:02 UTC | ndm | I suggest you discuss it on the talk-gb mailing list before making further YHA-related edits. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-31 10:46:37 UTC | ndrw6 | Personally I think ndm's interpretation of project quality standards and copyright laws is overly strict and should not be treated as an official opinion of the osm community. (neither should be mine) Indeed it is good to discuss larger contributions like this in public, and perhaps get yha invo... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-31 11:17:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | As ndm says, the best place to discuss things like this with the wider GB community is https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb . Good luck! | |
| 5 | 2018-03-31 17:52:57 UTC | ndm | https://www.yha.org.uk/ has "© 2017 YHA (England & Wales)". Like OpenStreetmap has "© OpenStreetMap contributors". If you believe the second is important -- then so is the first.Anyway, If there's agreement on the mailing list then there's less likelihood of cha... | |
| 57590923 by osm update | 1 | 2018-03-30 08:20:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | As requested previously in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1331 please do use meaningful changeset comments. "create changeset" is not a meaningful comment. Also what is the source used here? |
| 57621383 by musaib ali | 1 | 2018-03-29 08:05:36 UTC | will_p | I didn't know Player Street had reopened to motor vehicles. For avoidance of doubt, please could you confirm that you have visited this location or let me know which source you used to know the access has recently changed. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2018-03-30 02:07:09 UTC | musaib ali | i made this change reviewing the fact that the access for motor vehicles was open on both ends of player street, so considering this I changed the access for the middle segment of player street to yes, if you have any local information regarding this you can go ahead and change it. Thanks. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-30 08:13:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | @musaib ali Please don't make changes like this based on just guesswork or aerial imagery (where you can't see signs at ground level).Can you also explain _why_ you made this change here? You are making changes in lots of geographically separated areas which suggests that you haven't actually v... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-18 22:23:49 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57425838 by cgoods-gamut | 1 | 2018-03-22 19:27:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-03-22 19:56:31 UTC | cgoods-gamut | Sorry about that. There's a Hello World code snippet I found on the Web that I ran. Did not realize it was changing things.Thanks,Connor | |
| 3 | 2018-03-22 20:24:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks.I've tried talking to the people behind osmapi at https://github.com/metaodi/osmapi/issues/66 , but I guess your code snippet actually hardcodes the live OSM server? Whereabouts was the code snippet that you found? Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2018-03-22 20:27:25 UTC | cgoods-gamut | It's actually on the wiki.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OsmapiIn the section 'Full Example' | |
| 5 | 2018-03-22 20:34:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Ha! I never thought about looking there. I'll have a go at changing it. | |
| 57327281 by International Circus Stardust Entertainment | 1 | 2018-03-19 20:08:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. For your data to be acceptable for inclusion in the OSM database it must be verifiable on the ground to other mappers. It doesn't look like your business has a physical presence at this area. Your website does not give an address. Thus your data ought be removed... |
| 2 | 2018-03-19 21:23:16 UTC | International Circus Stardust Entertainment | Hi Bernard,Thank you for your reply.To tell you the truth, I’m not totally sure how OpenStreetMap works. I thought it was something like Google maps or IOS maps. I was just trying to promote my business.You are correct that my business does not have any physical presence at the address. ... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-20 08:35:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Shaun, I see and accept from your link that you operate the business from that address. However, this can only be a virtual address, which is what you say.The problem for OSM is that features ought to be verifiable on the ground. I quote from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practi... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-20 19:30:18 UTC | International Circus Stardust Entertainment | Hi Bernard,I live and work from Hastings, on the sunny south coast. I recently deiced to get a registered business address for my company, Kemp House, 152 – 160 City Road, London. The reason I did this was to give my company a more professional appearance. I only recently came across Open ... | |
| 5 | 2018-03-22 19:04:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,OpenStreetMap isn't a business directory - as Bernard said, it's designed for things that are geographically verifiable. For example, the Moorfields Eye Hospital is verifiable by anyone (there are lots of signs for it) but if you've just got a mailing address in a building on the City Road the... | |
| 56113615 by erantr1 | 1 | 2018-03-19 11:39:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, just wondering what the change was here? You've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398622386/history from service to unclassified - was that based on local knowledge or survey or something else? It certainly doesn't look like an unclassified road in the imagery.Best Regards,Andy\... |
| 2 | 2018-03-22 15:15:55 UTC | erantr1 | Hello Andy,Thanks for letting me know.I made this change about a month ago, probably by mistake. I will revert to service highways.Best regards,Eran. | |
| 57074263 by Ant Ko | 1 | 2018-03-11 11:28:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Ant Ko,Can you explain the source of the data used here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-03-18 12:04:59 UTC | Ant Ko | The source of this data should be my brain, and hopefully, in the Kawthaung Development Committee's plans... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-18 12:46:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | How did the information get into your brain? Did you read if from somewhere else? If so, where? | |
| 56856510 by UAN51 | 1 | 2018-03-14 23:25:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, The history of a couple of things here http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=498377008 and http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=522453556 seem to show that there's some sort of edit war going on. Do you have any evidence of the signage on the ground? What the Public Works uses isn't r... |
| 2 | 2018-03-15 08:50:19 UTC | UAN51 | According to the survey I took around Dec 2017/Jan 2018, the following signs were along North Antioch Road (remember, Doyotek and I were arguing about the prefix):On Kansas City's jurisdiction:-"N Antioch Rd" signs existed in 29 intersections (including north of Happy Rock Park; majori... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-17 10:38:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I've commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56838729 . | |
| 56838729 by Doyotek | 1 | 2018-03-14 23:23:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OSM!You mention that you "keep having to fix this", and http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=498377008 and http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=522453556 do show that there's some sort of edit war going on here. Do you have any evidence of the signage on the g... |
| 2 | 2018-03-15 00:25:36 UTC | Doyotek | Then how do we handle the name of the road when 1 street sign says just "Antioch", "NE Antioch". then "N Antioch"? The Newer signs all say "NE Antioch" and they are randomly placed along the route. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-15 00:33:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | If part isn't obviously one and another part the other, perhaps pick the most common variant? That's what I did with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95467361 (just up the road from where I live). There 5 out of 6 signs have one version and 1 another, so I went with the "5 out of 6" nam... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-15 00:44:17 UTC | Doyotek | Its not that. Problem is that the city has been slowly replacing the signs back to NE Antioch as needed. Its starting to be randomly put back to the official name. Problem is that there is also another road that actually is N Antioch. | |
| 5 | 2018-03-17 10:37:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'd go with the on the ground value, even if it's "wrong" by some official definition. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56856510 suggests that "N Antioch" is currently the most popular value. If that's the case, I'd go with that version, until more signs are replaced and... | |
| 55979006 by marc__marc | 1 | 2018-03-16 17:41:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | There seems to have been a problem with this edit in that it has affected https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241758144/history which was not touched by wheelmap at all. Where a mapper has explicitly added an "unknown" access value it makes sense to leave it - for example I'll quite often t... |
| 2 | 2018-03-16 21:43:25 UTC | marc__marc | Hello,This ae was not a "bug fix only". the wheelmap bug was only the "start point" (and the main "feed") to discover this problem.For my documentation, you are right. i didnt update it, the current description was the one used at the begging of the German talk.... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-17 10:07:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've updated the link to better describe the edit - thanks for that."wheelchair" is a bit different to other access tags in OSM (with other access tags "yes" normally means "a legal right to", with wheelchair it means "physically accessible").As previous... | |
| 56127378 by Verdy_p | 1 | 2018-02-09 13:29:41 UTC | Verdy_p | This was done in rawedit (which still offers no way to add edit comments); this added more evident dictinctions in names, between land areas and admin boundaries |
| 2 | 2018-03-15 00:10:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,What exactly is "Jersey (land mass)"? That looks like a description rather than a name. If you want to have a relation for that, fine - but please don't make up names for things like that. Also, this does look very much like an undiscussed mechanical edit...Also, this is a ver... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-15 00:18:12 UTC | Verdy_p | Raw edit is a set of individual edits on isolated tags. There's no way in it to create separate changesets, they are closed automatically but after long time (only made by the server, not by that editor).The names for landmasses are not rendered on map, but they do no represent the whole area so y... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-15 00:20:59 UTC | Verdy_p | An no this was absolutely not "mechanical edit", they were done individually at very small speed, with raweditor, over a long perdiod of several hours using other editors.If you know how to force "rawedit" to close its open changeset...Why did I use rawedit, it's because for ... | |
| 5 | 2018-03-15 00:28:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | "Jersey (land mass)" is not a name, it is a description.Re "RawEdit", you might find https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Level0 more functional. | |
| 6 | 2018-03-15 01:40:10 UTC | Verdy_p | Except that rawedit is integrated with other tools that propose to use either it (simple and fast for minor tag changes), or JOSM (too slow for these cases)The names are consistant witrh other names for Landmass and were used because of confusion of admin boundaries and the fact that soime people ... | |
| 7 | 2018-03-15 01:41:40 UTC | Verdy_p | Note: "Jersey" alone would alsop be incorrect ! Jersey is larger than that.The name is already fully descriptive of the intended use.It will never cause any problem in searches of boundaries.... | |
| 8 | 2018-03-15 17:50:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hu Verdy_p,Please don't be so argumentative - I'm trying to help you here!With regard to names, their use in OSM is well-established - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only . By those criteria "Jersey (land mass)" is not a name. The actual name for b... | |
| 9 | 2018-03-15 17:57:28 UTC | Verdy_p | This method of naming differently has been used everywhere else since the beginning, because there were confusions betwee ndistinct objects (and Nominatim was also confused and did not allow making the distinction between landmasses and admin boundaries, but also because various contributors changed... | |
| 10 | 2018-03-15 18:01:20 UTC | Verdy_p | Note: the OSM website (here). Does not allow seeing distinctions easily (the types of objects are NOT specified at all in list of members or list of parent relations).So confusion is extremely frequent when this OSM site does not make any difference, but just displays the "name" tag, the... | |
| 11 | 2018-03-15 18:03:58 UTC | Verdy_p | Remember that these "names" found landmasses are never rendered at all with labels on maps because they are NOT boundaries. They are just used by reference from other objects or selected and found by specific tags.May be iD and this site should display at least the "note" tag, ... | |
| 12 | 2018-03-15 18:17:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Another well-established principle is that we do not tag for the renderer, or how it appears in a search engine such as nominatim, or how it appears in an editor such as iD, or on this website. "Jersey (land mass)" is not a name, and shouldn't be assigned the name tag.Also, yes, I am ... | |
| 13 | 2018-03-15 18:25:36 UTC | Verdy_p | So you want to reverse a decision that was taken long time ago by other people (not me) to use distinctive name without even asking them why they chose that convention? And you don't care at all about the confusions that were made (which was why I made this changeset to solve duplicates or incorrect... | |
| 14 | 2018-03-15 19:43:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | > So you want to reverse a decision that was taken long time ago by other people (not me) to use distinctive name without even asking them why they chose that convention?Can you please point to such a "decision"? The best description of how we map names in OSM includes https://wiki.o... | |
| 15 | 2018-03-15 21:08:21 UTC | Verdy_p | I've not tagged for the renderer. FULL STOP. I have used existing conventions (sused since long). FULL STOP. I have solved incorrect tagging caused by confusion. Names are accessory but still essential for editors. the iD editor still does not make any distrinction when selecting relations, you hav... | |
| 16 | 2018-03-15 21:09:06 UTC | Verdy_p | In summary: I did not use any incorrect tags, I fixed them to remove duplicates or incorrect references between unrelated areas. | |
| 17 | 2018-03-15 21:18:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | > In summary: I did not use any incorrect tagsSo where (in Jersey or elsewhere) can I go to find the name "Jersey (land mass)" then? Or is it just a "name" that you made up? | |
| 18 | 2018-03-15 21:19:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | But the more serious question is: why it's always _you_ that seems to be having these discussions? What is your theory as to why this happens? | |
| 19 | 2018-03-15 21:21:13 UTC | Verdy_p | The incorrect tags (notably using type=boundary and boundary=administrative) or references caused also severe rendering problems for the international borders or some regional borders: they were discontinuous because queries for borders retrieved two unrelated relations, and renderers tend to elimin... | |
| 20 | 2018-03-16 13:05:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's happening again (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Verdy_p#Route_relation:_Roles_forward:stop:.3Cnumber.3E_etc._on_page_Relation:route ) so I'll ask the question again:Why it's always _you_ that seems to be having these discussions?What is your theory as to why this happen... | |
| 21 | 2018-03-16 14:09:56 UTC | Verdy_p | Why is it only you that inists on what is not an issue at all ? Stop this harassment. | |
| 22 | 2018-03-16 14:20:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's a genuine question, honestly - most people don't have lots of people complaining on their wiki talk pages.Why do you think it happens to you? | |
| 23 | 2018-03-16 15:30:20 UTC | Verdy_p | "lot of people is your interpretation" actually this is very small to the number of thank you I receive directly.You are just harassing me for sometinh which is absolutely not an issue anywhere and don't want to recognize that I solved really incorrect tagging that caused real problems.\... | |
| 24 | 2018-03-16 15:38:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | > "lot of people is your interpretation" actually this is very smallNo - most people don't have multiple archives of complaints on their wiki talk page. I'm trying to understand why this is happening to you and if there's anything that can be changed that would avoid it.> Yo... | |
| 25 | 2018-03-16 17:30:40 UTC | Verdy_p | Only because I'm above average users, just means there is a higher chance of friction occuring with just a few (like you do) for things that are in fact not even a problem or just because of personal opinions. Landmasses could even have no name it all (they are never needed for rendering), but since... | |
| 26 | 2018-03-16 17:41:58 UTC | Verdy_p | This was documented since long first in Germany https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:land_areaA name attribute is allowed, but the doc never says it is mandatory, its value is completely unspecified and it can be omitted completely. If it is there it is just a helper for contributors bu... | |
| 27 | 2018-03-16 18:03:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | On the issue of "land area relations" (the original issue here, but less important than the way that we work together as mappers) the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:land_area page just says "name" - i.e. "add the name of the thing". It does _not_ say &... | |
| 28 | 2018-03-16 18:09:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | ... and on the more important issue:> Only because I'm above average usersBy _quantity_ of _wiki_ edits, certainly.However, looking at your wiki talk page and at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=90780 there does seem to be a consistent problem. Have you ever r... | |
| 29 | 2018-03-16 18:11:07 UTC | Verdy_p | You're inventing interpretations.Since the begining it has always included accurate disambiguation. These landmasses are ***not*** the countries/regions, it has alwyas been a ***part*** of them.You're just continuing to fight against what is actually not a problem at all anywhere.The diusambig... | |
| 30 | 2018-03-16 18:17:21 UTC | Verdy_p | for your most recent reply: you continue making personal attacks. and asserting false things about what I do or think.I replied, you refused and argumented, and you don't want me to argument ? Sorry but you are not trying to find any solution, your going to nowhere.You retierate your arguments, ... | |
| 31 | 2018-03-16 18:33:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Many of these landmasses have their own defined geographical name distinct from the admin boundaryThere are examples of this - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/375761 is genuinely named "Mainland" and is part of the Orkney Islands. However the "landmass" names are s... | |
| 32 | 2018-03-16 18:38:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | > you continue making personal attacksWhat in my comments above constitutes a "personal attack"? The fact that I've linked to your wiki talk page? Throughout I've tried to be positive (e.g. "https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only is how OSM handles name... | |
| 33 | 2018-03-16 18:52:34 UTC | Verdy_p | "Map what is on the ground" is not applicable. There's no such tyhing on the ground. So these names can ONLY be descriptive and should be made accurately so that it it is still distinct from what would be really on the ground...This is a case where any choice (with or without the disambi... | |
| 34 | 2018-03-16 20:03:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | I don't understand most of what you're trying to say here, but to be clear, I am simply trying to explain some of the key principles of OSM (in each case linking back to what documentation we have), and am asking questions about why you find yourself in conflict with so many people in OSM so much of... | |
| 35 | 2018-03-16 20:32:32 UTC | Verdy_p | When I do make errors, I recognize them immediately, and correct fast. But you've not conveinced me that there was an error, so it is an unfruitful discussion. Nothing wxas decided, but you want absolutely from me that I reply to you that I was worng or made an "error" or that I'm "wr... | |
| 36 | 2018-03-16 21:22:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | > But you've not conveinced me that there was an error, so it is an unfruitful discussion.Unfortunately, that's not how "compromise" works.Also to be clear it's not just "my opinion against yours" - I've quoted accepted OSM best practice (and linked to the relevant article... | |
| 37 | 2018-03-17 01:46:36 UTC | Verdy_p | STOP STOP STOP!You are saying "You're wrong since the begining", and have given NO proof at all that there was any error or problem.STOP THIS HARASSMENT WAR ! I absolutely don't have to ackowledge your different opinion, keep your opinion and I keep mine, but NO there has been NO dem... | |
| 38 | 2018-03-17 02:04:37 UTC | Verdy_p | that I had effectively corrected bugs, but you insist on something else that is a NON-ISSUE and NOT what I really corrected, pretending that this name has a semantic value, when in fact it has no value except for contributors using the editing tools as a useful hint (because this name has NEVER been... | |
| 39 | 2018-03-17 02:07:10 UTC | Verdy_p | And you pretend that I said only "you're wrong" to you, this is an invention you do! You have constantly used only this argument yourself against me. And you've never presented any evidence. I showed you evidences that whhat you want has NEVER been decided and that it contradicts all past ... | |
| 57201898 by Nop | 1 | 2018-03-15 18:05:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - you've deleted the weather buoy at lat 0, long 0 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900/history along with the other stuff you deleted at "null island".Also, what has "iD" to do with anything? It's _JOSM_ that has the "feature" of adding new objects at ... |
| 2 | 2018-03-15 19:57:09 UTC | Nop | So both editors have the problem. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-15 20:01:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you point to a series of previous examples where it happened with iD? I keep an occasional eye on edits here via whodidit, and I don't remember a systematic problem with iD. The biggest current source of problems are probably people testing osmapi like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/5... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-15 21:36:52 UTC | Nop | - Start iD without coordinates- press "zoom in to edit" and you're there | |
| 5 | 2018-03-16 12:38:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you point to a series of previous examples where it happened with iD? (I've undeleted the missing Pirata buoy node BTW) | |
| 57212812 by amith reddy | 1 | 2018-03-15 20:08:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 45111013 by Verdy_p | 1 | 2017-09-06 18:00:37 UTC | FahRadler | thats no roundabout!!!-> a kind of turning loop |
| 2 | 2017-09-06 18:52:55 UTC | Verdy_p | where, I've looked at all of them individually, may be there's some invisible signs that could say the opposite | |
| 3 | 2017-09-06 18:53:35 UTC | Verdy_p | Exceptions to this is extremely rare in France. | |
| 4 | 2017-09-09 09:30:37 UTC | FahRadler | i´ve been there, that a turning loop | |
| 5 | 2017-09-09 10:04:30 UTC | Verdy_p | such comment in not useful if you don't specify "where" | |
| 6 | 2018-03-15 00:12:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Verdy_p is this another mechanical edit? Maybe if your change was in a smaller geographical area and not a whole country you wouldn't have to ask "where" when someone asks about the validity of an object in it. | |
| 57081255 by Carlos de Gouveia | 1 | 2018-03-11 14:36:05 UTC | pitscheplatsch | Hi Carlos de Gouveia, welcome to OSM.Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? Furthermore, can you revert your changes?Thanks. |
| 2 | 2018-03-13 17:51:18 UTC | Carlos de Gouveia | I'm sorry, didn't realise what I did. I will delete the data if I can find it. If you have access to it (before I get to find it) please would you revert it? I will use the test server as you suggested. Apologies. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-13 18:27:52 UTC | Carlos de Gouveia | Hi, I have no idea how to revert this change set. Will this need to be done via the api? Or is there a procedure I can follower on my browser? Appreciate the assistance. Thanks, Carlos | |
| 4 | 2018-03-13 20:23:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Actually, I deleted it yesterday... | |
| 5 | 2018-03-14 05:16:11 UTC | Carlos de Gouveia | 👍 | |
| 56899885 by scrapperuk | 1 | 2018-03-06 20:52:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OSM!I'm afraid something looks to have gone very wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288800325 etc. - it's merged all of the tags from the individual sections of former railway together, and most of them don't apply to any one individual segment. Compare for example ... |
| 2 | 2018-03-06 21:11:31 UTC | scrapperuk | Hi AndyI'd be happy for you to correct my error, and apologies for any inconvenience caused. I guess the learning curve is a little steeper than I first thoughtThat particular segment is one that I've been heavily involved in physically creating by converting a disused railway into a useable p... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-07 09:32:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I'll have a look when I get a chance (probably later on today). | |
| 4 | 2018-03-13 00:52:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | OK - that should be done now. I've applied the tags that had been merged into the whole length (foot=permissive, highway=path, horse=permissive, motor_vehicle=no, mtb:scale=1, name=Clowne Branch Line, surface=unpaved) into each section and left the bridges etc. as they originally were. The "l... | |
| 57005507 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56941668 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57126162 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 56766355, 56766813, 56767007, 56770101, 56795529, 56797073, 56797532, 56807682, 56807734, 56824164, 56824410, 56824681, 56824975, 56825248, 56825272, 56825455, 56825547, 56851527, 56851778, 56852074, 56852261, 56852329, 56853406, 56853663, ... |
| 56876453 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912517 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008777 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56853406 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56853663 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56854719 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56825547 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005540 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56824975 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56852261 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56825455 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56851527 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56807734 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56797073 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912273 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008746 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005967 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005529 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56766813 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56824681 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005518 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56854534 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57007314 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57007703 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008581 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008092 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912225 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57007357 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-11 21:53:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello GeoBeau,Please don't add imaginary data to OpenStreetMap. Can you please explain what you're trying to do - then people might be able to help.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-03-12 03:15:57 UTC | GeoBeau | Hey all.Some comments are telling me that OSM is not for making this type of map :( ...and some are trying to help.... ??? I just needed a free program for a one time trail map. Realized that OSMhad limitations but the export output was in .pdf . Therefor after I worked around the limitations an... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-12 19:23:05 UTC | Viajero Perdido | You left behind a mess.Do you feel any sense of obligation to clean it up? Because someone will have to. | |
| 4 | 2018-03-12 22:02:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you want to "just create a one-off map" then something like https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ is probably your best option.I'll have a go at tidying the test data here, by the way. | |
| 5 | 2018-03-12 22:10:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba | |
| 57008880 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005603 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57006973 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912331 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005650 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56854065 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56797532 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56941730 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005397 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005570 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008664 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912467 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56855259 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56853939 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008982 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56941695 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57006292 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912371 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912442 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56767007 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008729 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56941784 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56854739 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56852329 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005861 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56852074 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57007490 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56824410 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56851778 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912123 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56854385 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56854856 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008696 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56824164 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56941712 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57009298 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-09 14:15:38 UTC | Glenn Plas | What are you doing here ? You seem to be totally missing the point of Openstreetmap.You're going to have to delete a lot here although it's doubtful you're going succeed in doing this on your own. It's even hard to explain why there are so many wrongs here. OSM is not meant to be used to c... |
| 2 | 2018-03-12 22:10:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba | |
| 56912563 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56854310 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56807682 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005435 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57007587 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008960 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56825272 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56770101 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57009123 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56766355 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56912420 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005481 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008915 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57008821 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005421 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56825248 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56856598 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57009064 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 56795529 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 57005889 by GeoBeau | 1 | 2018-03-12 22:10:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba |
| 54811771 by Marreberendsen03 | 1 | 2018-03-12 20:19:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548338260 seems to be a square area of water in the middle of the Atlantic. Is it in the wrong place, or did something else go wrong?Best Regards,Andy |
| 56993136 by loescher | 1 | 2018-03-09 12:30:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | "Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 56956243 by bugmenotplzemailname | 1 | 2018-03-07 08:36:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. I've deleted the rest of the recent doodles. |
| 2 | 2018-03-07 08:44:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Actually, one more thing - if you spot any more of these please drop a mail to data@osmfoundation.org (even if you've already deleted them). | |
| 56933633 by أ ش | 1 | 2018-03-06 13:26:18 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello ألبرشت شونكا,Please use meaningful changeset comments for your changes - it helps everyone else understand the reasoning behind and the source for the changes.In this case I'd agree that an English language name doesn't make sense for the "name" tag here, but can y... |
| 2 | 2018-03-06 13:31:00 UTC | أ ش | Yes, often the communication is a problem in OSM.Maybe we should made an arrangement that both tags are used, e.g. "هەولێر / أربيل"What is your opinion for a solution?With best regards | |
| 3 | 2018-03-06 13:35:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | That approach is certainly used in some places in OSM when there isn't an obvious "most popular" value for that name. Given the "to and fro" edits that the name has seen "هەولێر / أربيل" is probably better than most of the orther alternatives. | |
| 56903476 by Anitha ganesan | 1 | 2018-03-06 11:15:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 56852460 by Tedros | 1 | 2018-03-03 18:56:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | (for info for anyone looking at this changeset)It's currently being discussed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1792 and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=686927#p686927 . If there's no clear answer there about why the previous status quo was wrong it'll get revert... |
| 56681964 by Jaypep1 | 1 | 2018-03-03 12:56:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I think that something's gone a bit wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4417115790/history here. Your change changed the name to "virus" rather than "Song Tan" or some variation. What I suspect happened was that MAPS.ME submitted a change based on out-of-date ... |
| 56834619 by Askdl0990 | 1 | 2018-03-03 09:03:04 UTC | pitscheplatsch | Hi Askdl0990, welcome to OSM.I think you should not remove such descriptions. For me this looks some kind of #vandalismMore details about your changes: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56834619 |
| 2 | 2018-03-03 11:31:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain how you know that the service road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456788673/history that you've deleted no longer exists?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 3 | 2018-03-03 11:31:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | こんにちは、あなたが削除したサービス道路https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456788673/historyがもう存在しないことをどのように知っているのか説明できますか？宜しくお願いします、アンディ | |
| 56598546 by dominique hoavonon | 1 | 2018-02-25 05:30:10 UTC | chachafish | I noticed you have imported hundreds, maybe thousands of buildings around the area of West 25th Avenue and Sheridan Boulevard, Denver, Colorado. These buildings do not represent what is on the ground. Perhaps you made this import by mistake? Did you contact local mappers for a community buy-in? Did... |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 21:51:03 UTC | dominique hoavonon | Bonjour, merci pour les retours, au fait je ne suis pas un débutant dans OpenStreetMap. Je ne sais pas ce qui s'est passé, souvent je test les imageries pour voir leur netteté, mais je vais ce qui s'est passé sur ces derniers modifications, si c'est décalage ou si ... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-26 03:12:13 UTC | chachafish | Hello, thank you for your reply. While you are trying to decide what went wrong with your import, will you please remove all of the thousands of buildings you have added to the Denver area? | |
| 4 | 2018-02-26 19:17:12 UTC | dominique hoavonon | Bonjour, pas besoin de suprimer les batiments je vais juste les modifiés conformement à l'imagerie Bing. Vous pouvez m'aidez à la modification si vous avez un peu de temps. Merci | |
| 5 | 2018-02-27 08:59:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Juste pour être clair, vous avez ajouté des bâtiments à Denver (aux États-Unis) pour https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1318. | |
| 56654104 by Dave Stanley | 1 | 2018-02-25 11:45:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just for info, I've commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56470373 (the previous change). Erbil's been the subject of "edit wars" over language as you can see at http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=599019138 with most common version being CKB (Central Kurdish).Best R... |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 14:23:27 UTC | Dave Stanley | I was not aware of the edit wars over this. I was there last month and I know people from that region. From what I have seen, Erbil is the common spelling, though I accept it is often transliterated as Arbil. Wikivoyage has just changed their page from Arbil to Erbil to align with Wikipedia. Fro... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-25 15:15:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Erbil's the English name, but what is the most commonly used on-the-ground name? Is it "هەولێر" (central Kurdish), "أربيل" (Arabic) or something else?If you were there last month I suspect that you have more up to date knowledge about what's actually called what t... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-25 16:00:20 UTC | Dave Stanley | The vast majority of what I saw was Erbil. It is worth having a look at the talk page for Erbil at Wikipedia as there is a fair discussion there. I do not read Arabic or Kurdish, so I cannot comment on those. | |
| 5 | 2018-02-25 16:06:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Wikipedia just says "Today, Erbil is both multi-ethnic and multi-religious" which isn't tremendously helpful :)> I do not read Arabic or Kurdish, so I cannot comment on those.Never mind - worth a try! | |
| 56648956 by Tedros | 1 | 2018-02-25 12:06:55 UTC | SimonPoole | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56648956 |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 13:52:30 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56661596 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits around Somalia | |
| 3 | 2018-02-25 15:25:00 UTC | Tedros | How is this political motivated edit? When in Somalia the official language is Somali? Why does state and cities have to bear Arabic names? It is like giving American cities German names? Really strange!! | |
| 4 | 2018-02-25 15:55:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | @Tedros That's the changeset comment of the reverting changeset. Among the things that you deleted was the disputed area of Somaliland: http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=3586169 . The change to http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=424317039 was odder - you removed the name tag altog... | |
| 56645156 by Tedros | 1 | 2018-02-25 12:01:44 UTC | SimonPoole | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56645156 |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 13:04:23 UTC | wambacher | And removing existential tags from boundaries (e.g. boundary=administrative) is really, really wrong.btw: editing boundaries using iD is a high risk of damage. use json. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-25 13:05:46 UTC | wambacher | sorry: Use JOSM, not iD | |
| 4 | 2018-02-25 13:18:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | @wambacher In this case I'm not sure that that's a good idea :) | |
| 5 | 2018-02-25 13:52:38 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56661596 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits around Somalia | |
| 56644529 by Tedros | 1 | 2018-02-25 12:01:22 UTC | SimonPoole | Unilaterally changing borders and names is considered bad practice, please discuss before changing. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56644529 |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 12:40:11 UTC | Tedros | Hi Simon, This is not an actual border but error it should be administrative border. However I understand your reply. Where should I report this next time? Thanks.Tedros | |
| 3 | 2018-02-25 13:07:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | What has "Article 2 (4) of the Charter..." to do with OpenStreetMap?Note that the OSMF has a a policy on disputed territories - see https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf for that. | |
| 4 | 2018-02-25 13:52:37 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56661596 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits around Somalia | |
| 56470373 by Danny Gagdou | 1 | 2018-02-25 11:39:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello (and welcome to OpenStreetMap!) - I'm trying to understand the reason for the name change here - as you can see from http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=599019138 the "name" tag for this place has been changed in OSM many times. Generally the "name" tag is used for a ... |
| 50568336 by Johnwhelan | 1 | 2018-02-21 21:45:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any idea what https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4887456774/history should actually be tagged as? |
| 2 | 2018-02-21 23:39:08 UTC | Johnwhelan | If you do a Crtl<H> in JOSM it will give you the history. I changed _id to id.If you contact the first mapper who added it they maybe able to give more details.John | |
| 56503321 by Principality of Andany | 1 | 2018-02-19 21:21:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Do you have any source for the "Gulf of Andany"? Normally "survey" would be a perfectly valid source, but in this case I suspect it's highly unlikely that there is a sign with "Gulf of Andany" on it in the middle of the sea. Please provide details of the source that... |
| 2 | 2018-02-19 21:55:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Actually scratch that - it's obvious from your other recent changes that you have made. | |
| 56251803 by Vigilante | 1 | 2018-02-11 12:54:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | What evidence do you have for the use of cyrillic within Kosovo? As Ifar as I can tell from outside even within Serbia cyrillic use isn't 100% (see for example https://www.b92.net/ ). The Kosovo government's website http://kryeministri-ks.net/?page=3,1 doesn't use it, and the Serbian government us... |
| 2 | 2018-02-11 15:19:05 UTC | Vigilante | Kosovo (Albanian: Kosova/Kosovë; Serbian: Косово]) is a disputed territory and partially recognised state[11][12] in Southeastern Europe that declared independence from Serbia in February 2008.Kosovo's constitution says official are both: albanian and serbian. If serbian i using two alp... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-18 10:52:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | I asked for examples of use of cyrillic within Kosovo and you didn't provide any. What script the Serbian OSM community is using is irrelevant; also note that https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2088990 has "name:sr=Косово и Метохија" it's perfectly possible to create ... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-18 18:56:23 UTC | Vigilante | Open thread about it in the forum, and it will be discussed. | |
| 5 | 2018-02-18 20:08:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Which forum do you mean?Here is a perfectly reasonable place to ask questions. | |
| 6 | 2018-02-18 20:19:44 UTC | Vigilante | Yap, but, there is no notification. I should search edit after edit. Personal message is ok? | |
| 7 | 2018-02-18 20:22:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | You should get an email notification for every message here - not sure why that's not working. Maybe go to osm.org and check the addtess there? | |
| 8 | 2018-02-18 20:29:40 UTC | Vigilante | Empty mailbox... Nothing.I will change with other mail tommorow.****This is my sugestion about it. http://myprintscreen.com/s/1518985600.04726712.png | |
| 9 | 2018-02-20 20:41:23 UTC | Marc Konjuhi | Google is not OSM, and in addition to that, in the territory of Kosovo, Serbian is used in latin form, also in new laws, street signs etc. OSM works with the reality on the ground, and the reality on the ground is that there´s the rRepublic of Kosovo with the administration in Prishtina, and t... | |
| 56151423 by shqiperietnike | 1 | 2018-02-18 12:31:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello shqiperietnike,Here you've changed the "name" of tag of http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=448739405 , a Serb-majority place in Kosovo. Please don't try and enforce your language on other map users. Back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37745579 I wrote "Ле... |
| 2 | 2018-02-18 12:32:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | (përkthim automatik)Përshëndetje shqiperietnike,Këtu ju keni ndryshuar "emrin" e tagut të http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=448739405, një vend me shumicë serbe në Kosovë. Ju lutemi mos provoni dhe zbatoni gjuhën tuaj në p&e... | |
| 56460664 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2018-02-18 11:38:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | The name was reverted back to "pre-edit war version". See http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=2088990 , and specifically http://osm.org/browse/changeset/56450586 which just changed the name without useful comment. |
| 56387571 by siffash | 1 | 2018-02-17 11:32:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello siffash and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Unfortunately we can't use wikipedia as a source for OpenStreetMap as the licences aren't compatible. Can you find a source for this name somewhere elsewhere that has a compatible licence?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-02-17 14:00:28 UTC | siffash | Hi Andy, thank you for your tip! Will keep it in mind. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-17 14:03:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | No problem. Any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask! | |
| 56416279 by Amiroch | 1 | 2018-02-16 23:42:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | The explanation behind the country names used here can be found at the answer that I gave to the help question https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/53812/contested-border-sahrawi-morocco-decision-to-display .Essentially OSM has its own rules for "what constitutes a country" (and in... |
| 56382069 by babayeb | 1 | 2018-02-15 22:47:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.Best Regards,Andy |
| 56231409 by Ismaeldiarria | 1 | 2018-02-14 00:00:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello - I think something went a bit wrong. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5402631563/history is in the middle of the sea?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-02-14 10:35:07 UTC | Ismaeldiarria | Thank you Andy Else for the correction.Regards.Abdoulaye | |
| 56255258 by dipikabadri | 1 | 2018-02-13 23:58:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 56301544 by jorgeluisztr | 1 | 2018-02-13 23:58:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 56332855 by Lululal2210 | 1 | 2018-02-13 20:22:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've created https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5410611721 as a tourist attraction, but it's actually already mapped. Also, please do reply when people have tried to contact you - you can see a list at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7603634 . If you don't peop... |
| 2 | 2018-02-13 22:35:51 UTC | Lululal2210 | Bonjour,Je vous prie de m'excuser pour les localisations que j'ai ajoutées, je n'avais pas compris qu'elles étaient publiques.Je n'ajouterai plus rien à partir de maintenant et me contenterai d'utiliser les localisations existantes.Bien cordialement,Ludivine | |
| 56275188 by Lululal2210 | 1 | 2018-02-13 20:20:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5406090521 is surely not a "tourist attraction"?Best Regards, Andy |
| 56229941 by HubMiner | 1 | 2018-02-10 05:37:30 UTC | maxerickson | Smaller bounding boxes please. |
| 2 | 2018-02-10 16:26:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've added a fixme to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4549740520 "Name is "second something" but what?". The answer to the question "something small enough to be carried into a shop and valuable enough to be worth doing so" - but that's pretty much the definition ... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-10 16:27:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - my mistake. It was me that added the fixme, but I've actually been there since and not updated the map. Sorry for the noise! | |
| 56171668 by BlueDream | 1 | 2018-02-08 11:54:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 56070070 by Xish Xehman Bangladesh | 1 | 2018-02-05 10:18:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello again,You've been warned before about adding unlikely data to OSM - I somehow doubt that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5381100564 is really an "aerialway=station". Please only add tags that actually make sense.Best Regards,Andy Townsend (on behalf of OSM's Data Working Gr... |
| 56013801 by technoprox | 1 | 2018-02-04 21:30:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please use more descriptive changeset comments rather than just "Fixing" - that doesn't really help other mappers to understand that changes that you are making here.Best Regards,Andy |
| 55855467 by Shahed Naeem | 1 | 2018-01-30 10:11:58 UTC | Claudius Henrichs | Hi,It seems with this changeset you accidentally added a few very long untagged ways that encompass the whole globe. I removed those four in these two changesets:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55888507https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55888571Would be good if you could revie... |
| 2 | 2018-01-30 10:23:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Also, it'd be really useful if you could use meaningful changeset comments that explain the changes that you're making. "#hotosm-task-502 #OSMBD #BHOOT #MissingMaps #Mapillary #BOIL #Pathao" doesn't mean anything at all - it's just a meaningless string of letters. | |
| 55456105 by triducsuz | 1 | 2018-01-19 02:50:46 UTC | Qwertii | Did you verify this data? Some of it seems to be incorrect. |
| 2 | 2018-01-21 03:02:30 UTC | CloCkWeRX | That... should probably be reverted. Orrong Road as 60? Maybe, but the rest? | |
| 3 | 2018-01-21 04:14:09 UTC | Qwertii | This user seems to enter a lot of incorrect data using streetcomplete and doesn't reply to comments. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-25 22:46:19 UTC | triducsuz | Hello to all,I will only respond to this matter out of all the alleged "issues" being flagged. I am new to this and only an occasional user. Not good at this and I was trying to learn it and add valued input. If you are flagging my inputs as issues, then I suppose you must have better ... | |
| 5 | 2018-01-30 10:18:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi triducsuz - thanks for your reply. If you're using StreetComplete presumably you can say "yes, I've been to Lansdowne Road (just to pick an example), and the speed limit really is 60 all the way along it"? Or did you perhaps make a mistake? It's useful to fill in tags such as surface... | |
| 55740996 by unknownPurger | 1 | 2018-01-28 11:11:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello unknownPurger,https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5260275/history is mapped as a relation with just one outer way. Is there a reason why it's mapped as a relation rather than a way? Is there perhaps another way to be added to it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 55740101 by unknownPurger | 1 | 2018-01-28 11:09:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello unknownPurger,You've removed the "name" fromhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4422767/history but left the "ref" (which looks pretty unlikely for a ref - it looks more like a description).What actually is the name and the ref here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 55802936 by azizchaibou | 1 | 2018-01-27 14:42:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5358438540#map=19/13.49525/2.09384 is and what the tag means please? It's not really clear. Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-27 14:42:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bonjour,pouvez-vous expliquer ce que https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5358438540#map=19/13.49525/2.09384 est et ce que le tag signifie s'il vous plaît? Ce n'est pas vraiment clair.Meilleures salutations,Andy | |
| 55710789 by Djibrill nafoga | 1 | 2018-01-27 14:40:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5358827724 mean and what the source is?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-27 14:40:56 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bonjour,Pouvez-vous expliquer ce que les tags sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5358827724 signifient et quelle est la source?Meilleures salutations,Andy | |
| 48986055 by Corban8 | 1 | 2017-12-16 09:12:44 UTC | int_ua | What exactly is "Kaart Ground Survey" and why are you adding POIs with this horrible spelling? At least in some case these POIs duplicated already existing ones with proper names. |
| 2 | 2017-12-16 18:43:02 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | Я думаю це копіпаст з Гугл стрит в 'ю а бо з напряму з гугл мапи Відправити у смітни к буде саме вірно | |
| 3 | 2017-12-22 13:53:03 UTC | Corban8 | The ground survey is images obtained from the area. I tried to do the best I could with the spelling from the imagery I had to go off of. If it is incorrect then please feel free to make the proper corrections. I apologize for any large mistakes and would appreciate any useful feedback on proper spe... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-22 16:14:04 UTC | Poliakoff Mykhailo | for you the languages with the Cyrillic alphabet are alien. You have made mistakes in the letters. I would advise to study the letters Cyrillic, or to map only objects in Latin letters.Also, only the first letter of the first word is written in bold. If the name contains several words then there... | |
| 5 | 2017-12-23 12:58:35 UTC | int_ua | Can you please provide the image used for adding https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4872757829 ? I've been there several times and don't remember anything similar, here is the current state https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/T010C_SjnKEuGSKRD6IUNAIn other words, can you prove that these edits are no... | |
| 6 | 2018-01-26 10:40:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Corban8,As suggested, would it be possible to cross-reference your edits here with Mapillary traces, and perhaps make your photographs available (with the date that they were taken) so that local mappers can compare?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. | |
| 7 | 2018-02-01 16:29:26 UTC | garylancelot | Andy,I am a member of Kaart and am working directly with Corban on this project. We traveled to the Ukraine in hopes to add beneficial contributions to the map in that area. As part of our process, we filmed the area using one second time-lapse footage from three different angles. I will provide... | |
| 8 | 2018-07-26 17:12:37 UTC | ConsEbt | Hi Garylancelot, have you ever provided a link to the images as offered? | |
| 53878719 by keithonearth | 1 | 2018-01-25 00:25:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Belated thanks here for trying to add a bit of neutrality to the dispute here! |
| 2 | 2018-01-29 06:14:13 UTC | keithonearth | Thanks for the positive feedback! :-) | |
| 55726039 by MembersOnly | 1 | 2018-01-25 00:00:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello MembersOnly,Can you explain this edit please? It doesn't make a lot of sense. Also what is the source?Best Regards,Andy Townsend |
| 55717437 by GeoThings | 1 | 2018-01-24 17:19:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Some of the tags used on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144705720 here (sepecifically "building:basement=YES" seem odd. Can you explain why you're using "YES" in uppercase here?Also "building:basement" as a tag isn't used elsewhere in OSM - there are other... |
| 2 | 2018-02-08 10:13:31 UTC | GeoThings | Andy:Thanks for your remind! It's our fault to use uppercase in this building, would change it soon.Also, since we already have discussion with other mappers, tag "building:basement" is the proper way to mark a building having basementBest Regards, GeoThings | |
| 54370061 by lethanhduc11 | 1 | 2018-01-23 23:36:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello lethanhduc11 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Among the things you've added here are a "pokemon go" tomb and a Vietnamese named bank. Do these things really exist?Best Regards,Andy |
| 55435350 by SK53 | 1 | 2018-01-17 22:29:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi - I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553075716#map=17/53.13572/-1.29515 is a golf hole/fairway/whatever rather than woodland? |
| 2 | 2018-01-18 13:35:26 UTC | SK53 | Yes, rather obviously! | |
| 25255143 by fitzsimons | 1 | 2018-01-15 10:09:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that the shoe shop https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276871620/history isn't inside a phone box - presumably there's a phone box one side or other of the shop? |
| 2 | 2018-01-15 11:23:41 UTC | fitzsimons | It's too long ago to remember much about this edit. The phone box is the one next to the postboxes at the DO. I can't see a shoe shop inside it. Are you seeing something I'm not? | |
| 3 | 2018-01-17 21:49:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | I was looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276871620 which has tags "shop=shoes" and "booth=KX100" on it. Maybe http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=276871620 shows the change clearer? | |
| 4 | 2018-01-17 22:22:54 UTC | fitzsimons | Well spotted. I see what you mean. Hopefully all sorted now. | |
| 55505130 by mbforr | 1 | 2018-01-17 21:06:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Just checking - has the name of the lake officially changed now? Someone added a note last July saying "The Community Advisory Committee recommended changing the name of the lake to Bde Maka Ska, but until the name is legally changed we should keep the name... |
| 2 | 2018-01-17 21:09:08 UTC | mbforr | It has been approved by Hennepin County:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Calhoun | |
| 3 | 2018-01-17 21:14:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - although that says "The change needs final approval at state and federal level in order to go into effect" presumably the change at county level is good enough for OSM? | |
| 55318658 by lcmortensen | 1 | 2018-01-17 10:01:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - the rail construction up to but not including https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319607231 is now marked as complete? Should the bridge be complete too? |
| 51268311 by mikkolukas | 1 | 2018-01-15 15:10:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added an "area" unclassified road at the magic roundabout https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7462227 - I don't think that that actually exists does it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-15 15:11:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - my mistake - you didn't add it, someone else did! | |
| 3 | 2018-01-15 18:12:31 UTC | mikkolukas | I just added more details. I believe the attempt is to show the area occupied by actual road.Proposals for solutions to these kind of situations are made but none are ratified yet. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-15 18:14:36 UTC | mikkolukas | The area could be marked as highway=primary (and split to secondary/tertiary where appropriate) | |
| 5 | 2018-01-15 18:29:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes, it's more of an "area:highway=blah" rather than anything else I think. That's usually the preferred way of mapping "road areas". | |
| 11913301 by Richard | 1 | 2018-01-15 15:15:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Whilst trying to work out what had happened to the Magic I noticed "ref=(45)" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2235672/history - is that a legit ref (in a "leading to NCN 45" kind of way?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-15 16:43:05 UTC | Richard | Pretty much - NCN 45 was originally 'braided' through Swindon with two possible routes; Sustrans has demoted one of them to a bracketed link route (as it has done in several places). | |
| 51022656 by Gabriel Reynolds | 1 | 2018-01-15 15:12:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added an "area" unclassified road at the magic roundabout https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7462227 - I don't think that that actually exists does it?Best Regards,Andy |
| 55009948 by parukhin | 1 | 2018-01-15 13:11:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Is adding spaces to opening hours (as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464539974/history ) really required? |
| 2 | 2018-01-15 13:33:52 UTC | parukhin | No, not really. But it make opening hours more comfortable for human reading. It's result of JOSM validator opening_hours "prettifying" options. (Adding spaces after ";" deleting after "," capitalization first symbols (mo-fr) etc. | |
| 52969730 by Yorvik Prestigitator | 1 | 2018-01-15 10:04:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/585425702 shouldn't be an amenity=telephone any more? |
| 55383289 by BlinkingNora | 1 | 2018-01-12 16:24:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello BlinkingNora,Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219187602/history is commercial? It doesn't look it on the imagery.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-12 16:26:12 UTC | BlinkingNora | Hello Andy, yes the imagery is rather outdated as a lot of shops and other retailers have opened up right near the Body Shop down the road. :) | |
| 3 | 2018-01-12 16:34:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! Are there still houses at the western end? If so you could split it in two and have residential at once side and commercial at the other. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-12 16:35:55 UTC | BlinkingNora | Hmmm, not sure of the specific details. I'll be visiting next week so will be sure to take some photos to make edits when I'm next back on my PC. (Not sure what OSM editor is available on Android) | |
| 5 | 2018-01-12 16:38:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've heard people recommend https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vespucci as an Android editor, but not used it myself. | |
| 6 | 2018-01-12 16:39:31 UTC | BlinkingNora | My thanks! I'll be sure to check it out sometime :D | |
| 43617972 by SomeoneElse | 1 | 2018-01-10 10:27:38 UTC | daveemtb | Hi, the path you marked as closed from Penally to the beach is (I believe) a public footpath that crosses a rifle range, and is temporarily closed when the path is in use. Your edit suggests it is permanently closed. Do you happen to know which is the case please? Thanks! |
| 2 | 2018-01-10 10:27:55 UTC | daveemtb | when the rifle range is in use, I mean! | |
| 3 | 2018-01-10 11:48:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing you mean http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102403267/history ? That runs through the golf course, not the rifle range. The signage (back in November 2016) did suggest permanent closure rather than "when the bullets are flying", but things maye have changed since then. At t... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-11 15:31:14 UTC | daveemtb | The County Council had confirmed by email that the footpath from Penally level crossing, past the firing range, across the golf course to the beach is currently open and passable, and isn't closed during use of the firing range. I'll mark it as open. | |
| 5 | 2018-01-11 15:32:18 UTC | daveemtb | Oh, and there was a problem with erosion following storms in 2014, which has now been addressed, perhaps that was the cause of the closed notice? | |
| 55198976 by ChrissW-R1 | 1 | 2018-01-09 09:24:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Could you explain what the source is here? "source=investigation" doesn't really explain anything...Best Regards,Andy |
| 22699454 by wilpin | 1 | 2018-01-06 18:01:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just wondered about the "embankment=yes" tag on the River Clyst http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285944892 . Is it "on an embankment" or does it "have embankments either side of it"? I'm currently trying to render the "embankment" tag for waterways. ... |
| 55156357 by Parrotias | 1 | 2018-01-04 13:17:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello, you've change the name on node 232172609 as can be seen by http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=232172609 . Can you explain the reason for the change? |
| 2 | 2018-01-04 13:21:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oh - and welcome to OpenStreetMap!(I hadn't spotted that it was your first edit). | |
| 3 | 2018-01-05 08:33:24 UTC | Parrotias | Hello, According to the United Nation and international recognition, name of this place is Zangilan not Kovsakan. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-05 10:40:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's actually not particularly relevant what the United Nations think. See this OSMF policy document for information: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf "The OpenStreetMap community operates under the “on the ground” principle, recording... | |
| 5 | 2018-01-12 22:42:16 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55394689 where the changeset comment is: Revert implausible changes in Nagorno Karabakh. Attempt to contact the user failed. | |
| 55125835 by Legolash2oLiam | 1 | 2018-01-04 11:21:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just wondered if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316865419/history etc. was still "landuse=railway" if the Bevercotes branch is no longer in use?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-04 12:03:41 UTC | Legolash2oLiam | Sorry! I believe I made a mistake. I've hopefully fixed. I am adding it's speed limits, restrictions, etc... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-04 12:54:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. What's the licence for the NESA data?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2018-01-04 13:02:29 UTC | Legolash2oLiam | There are downloadable PDFs on the link below.https://www.networkrail.co.uk/industry-commercial-partners/information-operating-companies/national-electronic-sectional-appendix/Because NR are publicly funded are required to be open on most things. You can ask for an account and you should hav... | |
| 5 | 2018-01-04 13:05:32 UTC | Legolash2oLiam | An example is the just the London North Eastern from the Network Rail site. It's 1186 pages but contains exactly the same information on the on-line version.http://archive.nr.co.uk/browse%20documents/sectional%20appendix/sectional%20appendix%20full%20pdf%20copies/london%20north%20eastern%20sec... | |
| 6 | 2018-01-04 13:15:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Unfortunately I don't think that "are publicly funded are required to be open on most things" will be good enough. Also, https://www.networkrail.co.uk/terms-and-conditions/ seems to explicitly prohibit use here.What I'd suggest is that you contact them and obtain an explicit waiver or s... | |
| 7 | 2018-01-04 13:37:24 UTC | Legolash2oLiam | Yeah I knew that quote could back fire. I remember reading on the Network Rail website something similar. They don't however release information on equipment location (in case of theft). Hence why I had to do a FOI request.Which part of the text are you referring to when you say "explicitly... | |
| 8 | 2018-01-04 15:19:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | I said "explicitly prohibits" because the Ts and Cs of the website talked about "personal and noncommercial use", which wouldn't be good enough for OSM. Now obviously exactly which data that applies to is a different question, but you've already asked them now, which is great :)... | |
| 9 | 2018-01-12 09:35:22 UTC | Legolash2oLiam | Just putting this out there. I got a response back from Network Rail saying it's fine as long as we source the information.I've sent an exact quote to SomeoneElse just in case. | |
| 55159148 by Moovit Team | 1 | 2018-01-04 15:17:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just for info, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Turkey suggests that foot=yes is the default on trunk roads in Turkey. If you've got an app that doesn't work without that tag, you probably need to fix the app. |
| 55115524 by mboeringa | 1 | 2018-01-04 11:24:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi, What was broken here? I'm not suggesting that something wasn't, just asking what it was so that the problem doesn't happen again :)Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-01-04 11:34:51 UTC | mboeringa | Hi Andy, the Clipstone forest multipolygon had one inner that touched the outer over a considerable length. This is technically not allowed (and certainly not in international Simple Features GIS standard), and I am actually surprised it rendered at all and PostGIS / osm2pgsql managed to create some... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-04 11:56:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. What I've done elsewhere (but not yet here) for this sort of problem is to create a larger "landuse=forest" or "landuse=forestry" area, usually with a name, and smaller natural=wood areas within, usually with leaf_type and other info. Around here what is the "fores... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-06 17:11:55 UTC | SK53 | Hmm, OSM Multipolygons do not have to obey the GIS Standards & I believe explicitly do not. Dont have all refs to hand, but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Relation:multipolygon#Touching_inner_rings is a start | |
| 5 | 2018-01-06 18:29:54 UTC | mboeringa | Yes, I know, but ultimately, if you do want the data to display in the "Standard" style, you will unavoidably need to consider this to some extent: osm2pgsql fills the PostGIS render database of openstreetmap-carto, and that database essentially needs Simple Features, as that is what PostG... | |
| 6 | 2018-01-06 18:34:51 UTC | mboeringa | As I wrote before, I am actually still surprised the original multipolygon relation rendered at all in the Standard layer... | |
| 55104357 by BrainDigitalis | 1 | 2018-01-04 11:32:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I've changed Dog and Duck from an "amenity=pub" with a name of "... (closed)" to a "disused:amenity=pub" based on the change here - that should avoid people accidentally going to it thinking that it is still a pub!Best Regards,Andy |
| 17230416 by stevea | 1 | 2017-12-29 11:33:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Steve,Just wondering about the leisure=park tag on here - I'm not convinced that it really is a "leisure=park" in the laid-out-parkland sense that's described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park . I'll admit it's a few years since I've been here, but I'd be surpri... |
| 2 | 2017-12-30 00:32:18 UTC | stevea | It's a good question, Andy, and it's nice to text with you in near real-time (I am a fan of your edits, you are dedicated!).What you are asking is at an edge of history in OSM as a project: in this part of California circa 2008-2010, this is how large parks were imported into this part of Calif... | |
| 54845713 by BayMapper | 1 | 2017-12-28 19:19:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello BayMapper,I notice you've added back the "leisure=park" tag to MacKerricher State Park http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7603526/history .It's a while since I've been there, but I'm pretty sure really not a "park" in the "leisure=park" sense (for info see ... |
| 2 | 2017-12-28 20:59:56 UTC | BayMapper | Hello. Thank you for bringing that to my attention. Feel free to change the tag to MacKerricher if you like. I already made an agreement with another mapper to not edit that park any more and I definitely do not want to deal with that guy again.And I am trying to get in the habit of making more ... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-29 11:24:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I've changed it to a boundary=protected_area (though national_park also seems to be used for state parks round here too). One more question - what about Mount Diablo State Park https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/187121 ? That always struck me as being similar - an area of countryside s... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-30 22:37:01 UTC | BayMapper | I've thought about this too. There does not really seem to be any one way of tagging these sort of parks that 100% matches their description. Some choose to tag it as a national park, or a nature preserve, or as a regular park with national park or protected area boundary. To me it seems more or les... | |
| 49934762 by MacLondon | 1 | 2017-12-28 18:15:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi - just wondered about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4943307720 - is it a highway=crossing or an amenity=bicycle_parking? I'm guessing it can't be both (and it's a couple of years since I visited, so I can't help as to which, unfortunately).Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-28 22:02:17 UTC | MacLondon | Thanks Andy. I've corrected the error.Regards,Mac | |
| 54748676 by Adamant1 | 1 | 2017-12-27 12:44:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just to let you know, OSM's Data Working Group got a complaint about the duplication in this area (which you may also have seen mentioned in the talk-us post at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-December/018216.html ), so thank you for tiding up some of the problems here... |
| 53890435 by paulmach | 1 | 2017-12-27 12:43:37 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just to let you know, OSM's Data Working Group got a complaint about the duplication in this area (which you may also have seen mentioned in the talk-us post at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-December/018216.html ), so thank you for tiding up some of the problems here... |
| 2 | 2017-12-29 07:24:41 UTC | paulmach | Thank you. I made the edit because it came up on OSM Inspector. I don't usually edit land use, but can see it needs some attention. | |
| 53204783 by Paramida | 1 | 2017-12-25 01:23:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi, I'm guessing that "embarkment_type" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534838009 should perhaps be "embankment_type"?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-25 15:00:37 UTC | Paramida | Hello,Yes, thanks for pointing that out. Error has been corrected. Changed from "embarkment_type" to "embankment_type". Greetings | |
| 53598691 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-11-08 10:23:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | What actually is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/768300036 ? The tags on there don't seem to make a lot of sense. Maybe one of them was added by mistake (7 years ago!) - normally what I'd do with those is try and contact the original mapper to find out what it actually is.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-23 22:36:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any news on the best tagging for Crumhenge? | |
| 3 | 2017-12-23 22:43:36 UTC | nyuriks | http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/4951473#map=14/39.9009/-75.3555 -- hasn't responded. | |
| 54091997 by Ant Ko | 1 | 2017-12-23 22:12:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Ant Ko,If http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394338259/history is not an airport any more it should not be tagged as an airport in OSM.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 54572575 by willB0T | 1 | 2017-12-12 19:03:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello willB0T and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Generally speaking, you might find it easier to use a more gradual approach when changing large things such as residential areas (even if they quite a bit wrong). It makes it easier to fix just a corner of a problem, and still have a valid residential ar... |
| 2 | 2017-12-23 22:01:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello willB0T,I see the residential landuse for Newport hasn't reappeared yet. Do you need any help?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 54847684 by Miller Liu | 1 | 2017-12-23 21:10:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Miller Liu,Can you explain why you've repeatedly deleted the tree at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5290770860/history ? Someone added it 6 days ago, you deleted it, then someone restored it and you deleted it again.Also, a number of other mappers have been trying to get in touch with... |
| 2 | 2017-12-23 21:11:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | 你好，米勒劉，你能解釋一下為什麼你一再刪除了這個樹：https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5290770860/history？ 有人在6天前添加它，你刪除了它，然後有人恢復它，你又刪除了它。此外，還有其他一些製圖人員試圖與您取得聯繫（請... | |
| 54842506 by Rahimam | 1 | 2017-12-22 15:37:53 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain the change that you've made here? You've removed some language code values, can yu explain why?The changeset comment you've used is just "change" - that doesn't really explain what you've changed to what and why. Can you explain?Best Regards,Andy |
| 54781396 by Deepika2724 | 1 | 2017-12-21 00:07:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| 50350359 by daveemtb | 1 | 2017-12-17 13:23:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just wondered what "highway=p" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4975309742 was?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-18 20:05:50 UTC | daveemtb | Good spot. Perhaps it was meant to be highway=passing place? There's a bug in the version of iD I was using where the text cursor jumps from the value box back to the key box after typing one or two characters. Could have resulted from that.If it looks like a passing place feel free to correct -... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-18 20:06:34 UTC | daveemtb | or rather passing_place | |
| 4 | 2017-12-18 20:23:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - it does look like a passing_place on the imagery, so I've changed it. | |
| 33539631 by mjessen_mdv | 1 | 2017-12-17 01:11:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've added "network=Nation Rail" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3711588220/history ; presumably this should be "National Rail". Isn't this also a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296406307/history ? |
| 54672993 by m6amiri | 1 | 2017-12-16 20:42:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!These buildings got added in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.I've deleted them now, but have you any idea how that might have happened?Best Regards,Andy |
| 54461544 by Matthieu Bessat | 1 | 2017-12-08 15:26:36 UTC | fantomas | Hello. You added objects to the ocean. Please, don't use OSM as sandbox. |
| 2 | 2017-12-16 20:23:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 3 | 2017-12-16 20:24:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Si vous voulez un serveur de test, peut-être que https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.orgfonctionnerait pour vous?Meilleures salutations,Andy | |
| 54452715 by Djoar | 1 | 2017-12-16 20:03:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea ho... |
| 54452705 by adiputra986 | 1 | 2017-12-16 20:02:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.Best Regards,Andy |
| 45252527 by dudone | 1 | 2017-12-15 11:09:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just spotted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466732976 - looks a bit long for a horse_stile? Also there's another just to the southeast. |
| 2 | 2017-12-15 19:42:35 UTC | dudone | Looks like JOSM's autocomplete has got the better of me. Corrected.RegardsDudley | |
| 3 | 2017-12-15 19:58:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! | |
| 49627648 by rowers2 | 1 | 2017-12-12 14:54:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello rowers2,This looks very much like a mechanical edit.Can you please explain what you were trying to do here and where you discussed it with the local community?Best Regards,Andy Townsend |
| 2 | 2017-12-15 17:59:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | (replying to an OSM PM that basically said "I was just using the JOSM validator")Hi rowers2,Please don't take all of the JOSM validator's suggestions at face value - you'll need to ask yourself if there are any other problems in an area and whether information would be lost by maki... | |
| 33868784 by dudone | 1 | 2017-12-14 12:58:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369596182#map=19/53.23763/-1.70266 really a stile? It looks like it's on a small road from the imagery suggesting perhaps gate or cattle grid? |
| 2 | 2017-12-14 20:02:47 UTC | dudone | Hi AndyI've changed it to gate.RegardsDudley | |
| 54579505 by BeachBumRetiree | 1 | 2017-12-12 23:48:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello BeachBumRetiree,Is there any reason why you changed the whole residential area here to a park? Maybe there are some "park" (or other green) bits and some "houses" bits?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-13 00:00:17 UTC | BeachBumRetiree | The neighborhood is spread out over a large area of land, with distinct residential areas interspersed with parks, woods, trails, tennis courts, green spaces, etc. Labeling the entire area "residential" overlooks this fact. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-13 00:08:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. In that case I'd actually split it up so that the "houses" bit is residential and and the other bits are tagged appropriately too (park/wood/forest/whatever). | |
| 4 | 2017-12-13 02:31:34 UTC | S-zation | But the fact that it is a housing development with woods, recreational areas, or grass dispersed throughout doesn't change that it is an area zoned for residential use. And all of the green spaces/tennis courts/trails/recreation areas are already mapped on top of it. It doesn't match the definitio... | |
| 54579850 by S-zation | 1 | 2017-12-12 23:34:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - you beat me to it (while I was upgrading perl over here!). |
| 38048271 by SK53 | 1 | 2017-12-12 18:51:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any idea what sort of barrier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405528505 is?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 21:10:22 UTC | SK53 | Wire fence (from photos), now added along with a lot of other features | |
| 3 | 2017-12-12 22:22:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! | |
| 4 | 2017-12-12 22:29:24 UTC | SK53 | More to be done. I dont think many field boundaries got added, all TS-C woods need severe tidying up etc. Lots of unmapped woodland towaards Lurgashall. | |
| 54574324 by S-zation | 1 | 2017-12-12 19:37:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just for info, I've blocked Darwin721 for a period of time - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1659 - for continually changing this residential area to a park. Are you OK fixing the problems here or do you need any help?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.... |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 19:46:56 UTC | S-zation | Hi there,Thank you for stopping the vandalism. I think I am ok with fixing the problems here. The biggest issue was the continual revert of the residential areas to parks. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-12 19:49:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | OK, thanks. We'll keep an eye open for edits by "known problem users" and keep an eye open for changes to the residential area. If you spot anything else iffy, drop a mail to data@osmfoundation.org .Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2017-12-12 20:30:27 UTC | S-zation | It looks like he is back on a new accounthttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/BayForestI can't revert all of the new changesets if he makes new accounts | |
| 5 | 2017-12-12 21:08:06 UTC | freebeer | Confirmed, you beat me to it.Back home from school.Off with the kid gloves, I suggest... | |
| 54511783 by StephenRD | 1 | 2017-12-12 19:10:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops, If you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53352807/history I think that something's gone wrong here - a small section of wall has been merged with lots of other ways to create something that is now tagged "fence; fence; wall; fence; fence; fence; fence; wall; fence; wall".Do... |
| 20644880 by SK53 | 1 | 2017-12-12 18:51:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Any idea what sort of barrier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2679422663 is?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 21:24:11 UTC | SK53 | A wooden gate; fixed | |
| 44965506 by dudone | 1 | 2017-12-12 18:49:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464186215 perhaps a hedge?Cheers,Andy |
| 54567447 by Darwin723 | 1 | 2017-12-12 14:38:12 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Darwin723,I've blocked this account for the reasons described at http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1658 . Your previous account was told many times not to mistag residential areas as parks http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6310073 .Best Regards,Andy Towns... |
| 54562247 by andrewmci | 1 | 2017-12-12 11:56:37 UTC | Chris Fleming | again - I don't believe this to be a park. This has been mapped as woods for nearly 7 years and has been edited as such by several people. Have all the trees been cut down and this turned into a park? |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 13:02:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello andrewmci,Whilst we're grateful for new mappers in OSM including those who seem to have come via Pokemon Go, please don't change existing features to "parks", whether they be gardens or areas of trees. In OSM there are many tags to choose from; always pick the most appropriate. F... | |
| 54366258 by Darwin721 | 1 | 2017-12-07 09:32:15 UTC | S-zation | Why is a residential neighborhood marked as a park? And a construction zone in the neighborhood is marked as industrial? |
| 2 | 2017-12-11 03:30:00 UTC | Darwin721 | Because OSM Influences Nests and Blocked Spawns: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheSilphRoad/comments/6ujkkv/osm_query_for_map_features_used_in_pokemon_go/ | |
| 3 | 2017-12-11 23:12:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Darwin721,Please don't "make things up" in OSM in the hope that things will turn up in Pokemon Go. This won't actually work for a couple of reasons - one is that people in OSM will change it back (as has happened here) and another is that according to the people who actually look ... | |
| 52698563 by David Hardillier | 1 | 2017-12-11 22:29:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I noticed this cafe called "Unknown" http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5152874523/history while tidying up mapping by some students up north. It's also removed the name here, but I'll add it back if the name really is called "Unknown" here (as opposed to you just not k... |
| 54368549 by BlinkingNora | 1 | 2017-12-07 23:38:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello BlinkingNora, Here you've changed http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24807683 to a "park". It certainly doesn't look like a park from the available imagery - that suggests it's an arable field with tramlines in it that a crop sprayer can go up and down.Various people have been cha... |
| 54275673 by Penelope | 1 | 2017-12-06 16:51:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Oops - here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5260355269/history got added at latitude 0, longitude 0. I have removed it. |
| 54067904 by Abdelali BOUSSIB | 1 | 2017-12-06 16:34:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | As you can see by looking at http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=54067904 , something went wrong here. Were you trying to import some data? Presumably you did not intend to add it to the middle of the sea?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-12-06 16:35:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Comme vous pouvez le voir en regardant http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=54067904, quelque chose s'est mal passé ici. Étiez-vous en train d'importer des données? Vraisemblablement, vous n'aviez pas l'intention de l'ajouter au milieu de la mer?Meilleures salutation... | |
| 37697227 by EzekielT | 1 | 2016-03-09 11:32:29 UTC | wambacher | reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37705806 |
| 2 | 2016-03-09 18:36:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi EzekielT,People have contacted you several times in the past about invalid admin level changes (including me, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33275714 ).Whereas most things in OpenStreetMap are simply a matter of going and surveying something and then adding the results to OSM, wit... | |
| 3 | 2016-03-14 00:17:25 UTC | EzekielT | I have many sources: http://www.stabroeknews.com/2010/news/regional/10/09/netherlands-antilles-no-more/, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constituent_country, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aruba, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sint Maarten, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curacao (although you did say... | |
| 4 | 2016-03-14 00:37:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | One of the articles you quote says "Aruba is one of the four constituent countries that form the Kingdom of the Netherlands". http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2323309 is the admin level 2 relation; Curaçao http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1216719 is a subarea of that.As... | |
| 5 | 2016-03-14 15:28:41 UTC | EzekielT | That's a good idea. Okay. | |
| 6 | 2017-12-04 19:17:17 UTC | tbakhuis | Curacao is not NL as the Nominitem geocoder suggests.Currently a lot of addresses are displayed in OSM as Street, Willemstad, 0000AA, NL. This is not correct. Here in Curacao we don't have zip codes and the NL should be changed to CW. Since 10-10 2010 Curaçao is an autonomous Country that... | |
| 7 | 2017-12-04 19:25:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I've added a comment over at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=675663#p675663 (which is the forum where admin levels etc. are discussed). However, I'm not actually sure whether you're describing a problem with the data in OSM or with the Nominatim geocoder (Curaçao i... | |
| 8 | 2017-12-04 19:53:38 UTC | tbakhuis | It does sound strange when you see it like that but we never put NL (Netherlands) as country. I live in Curacao it just doesn't look right when we see Curacao, NL. Google's Geocoder has it right this time. Google Geocoder has Street, Willemstad, Curaçao | |
| 9 | 2017-12-05 08:49:08 UTC | wambacher | please read this answer at the forum: #######################Just for clarification:There is a 'Kingdom of the Netherlands' (plural intended) - or 'Koninkrijk der Nederlanden' (idem).Within this kingdom there are 4 autonomous countries:- the Netherlands (again, plural intended in Eng... | |
| 10 | 2017-12-05 16:44:54 UTC | EzekielT | That's what I knew all this time, but I guess all of you still didn't listen :). | |
| 11 | 2017-12-06 10:52:25 UTC | wambacher | Hi EzekielT. no easy stuff ;)see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=675929#p675929 | |
| 12 | 2017-12-06 20:52:13 UTC | EzekielT | Maybe we should tag all of them (Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Netherlands, Aruba, Sint Maarten, and Curaçao) as admin_level=2, as they're all officially countries! | |
| 13 | 2017-12-06 20:58:34 UTC | EzekielT | As in:Kingdom of the Netherlands (including the Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao, and Sint Maarten) -> admin_level=2Netherlands -> admin_level=2Curaçao -> admin_level=2.Aruba -> admin_level=2.Sint Maarten -> admin_level=2. | |
| 14 | 2017-12-07 03:15:43 UTC | tbakhuis | Seems correct to me. Indeed they're are all countries | |
| 54315308 by BlinkingNora | 1 | 2017-12-04 10:42:54 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello BlinkingNora and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Thanks for all your updates around Littlehampton. I just wondered about the change to this landuse though - it was "residential" before, and on the imagery it still looks fairly residential, is it really best described as commercial?Hope ... |
| 33003129 by SK53 | 1 | 2017-12-04 00:14:04 UTC | SomeoneElse | ... so there was I looking for wind turbines, and I found this one. It's the only "power:generator=wind", and there are various other ones in use: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=wind#values . |
| 54304724 by Paul Lockwood | 1 | 2017-12-03 19:06:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,It looks like that's already mapped as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165124356 .Best Regards,Andy |
| 30925352 by edy kurniawan | 1 | 2017-12-03 17:59:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Lots of buildings here have the same tags as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343819447 . Is that correct, or has it perhaps been copied to them all by mistake?Best Regards,Andy |
| 54296465 by Gwynfor | 1 | 2017-12-03 13:00:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | "disconnected highway" is because it isn't joined to the roads at either end. You can see that by looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544319672 - if it was joined at either end you'd see each end say "part of way ..." like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38499018 does... |
| 54261645 by Krital | 1 | 2017-12-02 23:16:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Krital,As previously mentioned in http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1618 , you're adding strange numbered points again, this time as "tourist attractions" Can you explain what they are?Best Regards,Andy |
| 54201839 by DeanChap | 1 | 2017-11-30 12:24:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can yo provide a little more detail about this change other than just "boundary corrections"? As I'm sure you're aware, a number of the boundaries here are disputed, and it'd be helpful to other mappers to explain what was wrong and what the change was in more detail.Best Regards,Andy... |
| 2 | 2017-12-01 07:16:17 UTC | wambacher | Hi Ivan,beside the fact, that this was a political motivated edit (Rep Srpska is NOT an internationally recognised country), you made some technical errors.changes have been reverted. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-03 21:40:12 UTC | michalfabik | Hi Ivan, you renamed the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina relation to "Herceg Bosna", why? I renamed it back to "Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine" as there is no recognised entity under the name of "Herceg Bosna". I'm quite certain that you know this very well. ... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-04 04:11:20 UTC | wambacher | @michal i tried to revert his changes, may be i missed that? | |
| 5 | 2017-12-04 07:00:20 UTC | michalfabik | Hi, yeah, it looks like it. I downloaded all three admin_level=4 relations that make up Bosnia and everything seemed fine, there was just this one glaring "error". It should be ok now. | |
| 54129400 by Ranger444 | 1 | 2017-11-29 19:32:32 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - have you checked this edit with the local community? http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44078077 suggests it's an actual deliberate name change.NPR suggests it's a valid change too. |
| 2 | 2017-11-29 19:38:07 UTC | Ranger444 | Wow, I had no idea they changed the name. Thought someone was messing with the data.I've reverted it | |
| 3 | 2017-11-29 19:44:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! | |
| 4 | 2017-11-29 19:46:30 UTC | Ranger444 | I thought the language was Russian... | |
| 5 | 2017-11-29 19:52:47 UTC | CinderBDT907 | https://www.facebook.com/COBarrow/photos/a.561904543975776.1073741828.560850137414550/886154371550790/?type=3&permPage=1 | |
| 6 | 2017-11-29 19:59:23 UTC | Ranger444 | Thanks Cinder, I looked at a few articles after SomeoneElse commented on the changeset and I changed it back... | |
| 5743176 by philippekerla | 1 | 2017-11-27 17:32:23 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,I know that it was a long time ago, but in this changeset you've added the same river twice. Have a look athttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/905736932andhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/905751387and see alsohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/5734699https://www.openstreet... |
| 2 | 2017-11-27 17:33:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bonjour,Je sais que c'était il y a longtemps, mais dans ce changeset vous avez ajouté la même rivière deux fois. Jettes un coup d'oeil àhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/905736932ethttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/905751387et voir aussihttps://www.ope... | |
| 54115748 by dgitto | 1 | 2017-11-27 11:29:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks (the perils of cut and paste!) |
| 54109930 by Rexma423 | 1 | 2017-11-27 09:05:58 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I've removed the wikipedia tag you added here because the wikipedia page for an abstract concept ("null island") isn't relevant to a physical buoy floating in the ocean.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-11-28 01:57:04 UTC | Rexma423 | I would disagree with you but do whatever you want. | |
| 7985291 by brianboru | 1 | 2017-11-26 16:24:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Mind if I change https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1262117773 etc. to "information=route_marker" and then add them to the Heart of England Way relation?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-11-27 08:53:56 UTC | brianboru | No problem. Go ahead | |
| 51588921 by gethyn85 | 1 | 2017-11-26 15:14:47 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Looking at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=pillbox#values the most popular tagging seems to be "military=bunker" together with "bunker_type=pillbox". https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1916451008 is an example of it.Best Regards,Andy |
| 48103132 by Breekweg | 1 | 2017-11-09 11:49:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Not sure how it happened, but a node got added in the Pacific in this change: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4814186894/history :) |
| 2 | 2017-11-25 15:52:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've deleted it. | |
| 48268435 by MapperGuy | 1 | 2017-10-22 01:28:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you want to test stuff, there's a test site over at https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ that you can use.It's probably about time that these were changed back to houses... |
| 2 | 2017-11-25 15:52:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've changed them back. | |
| 52659024 by Paul Lockwood | 1 | 2017-11-25 15:02:50 UTC | SomeoneElse | HelloFrom the decription, it looks like http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5150025623 might actually be a brewery rather than just a bar. In order to add a brewery to OSM you'll need to use a different editor to MAPS.ME - it only allows the creation of basic points of interest. If you go to https... |
| 52145860 by lovenes | 1 | 2017-11-05 15:56:35 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you please have a look at these changes? You added some "highway=residential" to objects which should rather be buildings.Jan |
| 2 | 2017-11-25 14:24:27 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've reviewed these, changed the "buildings" to buildings and removed some that just looked like a bit of concrete had been swept. | |
| 54059703 by nabla_de | 1 | 2017-11-25 12:53:06 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello nabla_de,This is a very big changeset - it covers most of the planet. It is difficult for other mappers to see what changed with changesets that are so large. Can you explain what changes you were making in here and what the source was? The changeset comment is just "ways corrected&q... |
| 2 | 2017-11-25 12:54:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hallo nabla_de,Das ist ein sehr großer Changeset - er deckt den größten Teil des Planeten ab. Für andere Mapper ist es schwierig zu sehen, was sich bei so großen Changesets geändert hat. Kannst du erklären, welche Änderungen du hier vorgenommen hast und w... | |
| 49657349 by sltyu03 | 1 | 2017-11-25 11:58:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello sltyu03 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!If you're wondering what this email is about it's about some OpenStreetMap edits you did back in June (along with the rest of a class?). We're trying to get in touch with the person who was teaching the class so if you can remember who that was it'd be g... |
| 49658191 by jonathanlwe | 1 | 2017-11-25 11:57:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Jonathan and welcome to OpenStreetMap!If you're wondering what this email is about it's about some OpenStreetMap edits you did back in June (along with the rest of a class?). We're trying to get in touch with the person who was teaching the class so if you can remember who that was it'd be ... |
| 49658412 by GracesChing | 1 | 2017-11-25 11:56:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello GracesChing and welcome to OpenStreetMap!If you're wondering what this email is about it's about some OpenStreetMap edits you did back in June (along with the rest of a class?). We're trying to get in touch with the person who was teaching the class so if you can remember who that was it'd ... |