| Changeset |
No. |
Date |
Contributor |
Comment |
|
| 49724373 | chillly | Welcome to OSMHas someone really converted a house to a restaurant and called it Test?I think this needs to be removed as a restaurant. |
| SomeoneElse | @chillly Maybe they're waiting for someone to remove their test data before writing up their dissertation on "how robust OSM is to vandalism"! |
| chillly | @SomeoneElse you're right, time to remove the junk |
|
| 48576507 | VlIvYur | Why did you dropp all of footway=crossing? |
| SomeoneElse | Can you give any examples? I've left e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488741633 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488741636 . Strictly speaking those are traffic calming cushions though not crossings as such. You _can_ cross the road there, but can just as well cross anywhere else as well.... |
|
| 49549101 | marek kleciak | Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act. |
| SomeoneElse | Hi Marek,Can you please explain what were the actual problems caused by this changeset and the others on which you have similarly commented?Also, you may find that that using emotive language such as "stop destroying" is less effective at communicating what you want to get across than ... |
| imagico | I would like to add that what bdiscoe did here was not in any way destroying a detailed map. He removed nodes which had a very little influence on the overall geometry because they were almost exactly in the middle between the next and the previous node. See http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?change... |
| SomeoneElse | For info, see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1385 . |
| bdiscoe | For what it's worth, I wrote OSM messages to marek kleciak explaining these edits, and even described the detailed steps he can do in JOSM to do the cleanup himself. |
| marek kleciak | We are in touch with bdiscoe now. I wrote him about reasons for this mapping. We have opportunity to make an very exactly example for nepali authorities and show the results during SOTM Asia 2017. All old, too less forest areas should be removed/modified. I hope for help of you all: The goal would b... |
| imagico | Who is 'we' here?Keep in mind that planning and organizing of mapping activities and development of mapping conventions should be public.Although there is not yet a formal policy on organized mapping activities it is good practice to document such activities and reference this in changeset c... |
| marek kleciak | We, is Kathmandu Living Maps. As you probably know from german forum I do a lot for Nepal and try to inform communities in Germany and Poland about recent situation there.What you wrote about mapping activities is a part of old OSM communication problem, but you´re absolutely right, I should... |
| marek kleciak | Hi everybody, KLL wil post information about this Project in the Wiki Project Nepal. Meanwhile I analyzed approach described by bdiscoe. Using generalization factor of 1.0 m we change the areas of smaller Farmlands in forests by up to 5%. I suggest the generalization factor of. 0.3m which make chan... |
| SomeoneElse | @marek - having nodes closer together doesn't make for a map that matches reality better; it just makes it more difficult to edit. If you've got some specific examples perhaps write it up as a diary entry? |
| marek kleciak | Absolutely. This matter needs an proposal and discusion of the community. |
| bdiscoe | Marek the starting point of your analysis is incorrect. It assumes that the existing, hyper-noded wood areas are precisely correct with no uncertainty or error bars. Consider the factors involved - imprecise criteria, human variability, seasonality, poor resolution, loose rectification, etc. it is... |
| marek kleciak | Ben wrote: imprecise criteria, human variability, seasonality, poor resolution, loose rectification.We have Premium Digital Globe images from last year for whole Nepal. Factors like human variability or seasonality are general for all OSM maps. Only activation of the community AND in this case l... |
|
| 45811104 | SomeoneElse | Has the flood barrier here been replaced by a dyke (in the Dutch, not the English sense)? The last time I was here there wasn't any sort of embankment here at all, just a flood barrier. |
| sperlingskauz | I made a cleanup because barrier=flood_barrier is a unusual tag. In most cases seamark:gate:category=flood_barrage is the right choise. But in this case it doesn't fit. In Bing it looks like a kind of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=dyke . Sorry, I was wrong. Is it a kind of wall ... |
| SomeoneElse | This bit's just a wall, so barrier=flood_wall would work. |
|
| 49744251 | SK53 | Hi, Just noticed your edits (nice adding the stuff up behind Woodhouse Park). You dont need to add foot=yes to a bridleway, particularly one with a designation tag: it's implicit in OSM that a highway=bridleway allows pedestrians, just as a highway=cycleway does in the UK (but not everywhere). Cycli... |
| SomeoneElse | FWIW, personally I'd always add foot=yes to "public bridleways" like this one so that someone (or more likely some router) unfamiliar with designation tags can figure out access rules.Cheers,Andy |
|
| 49795247 | GinaroZ | Thanks for improving the tagging, just a shame the names aren't rendered on the standard layer :( |
| SomeoneElse | Other maps will still show them - https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=15&lat=56.09576&lon=-3.30543 . |
|
| 10918386 | SomeoneElse | Hello,What does "disused=no:isolated" on "Cromford Canal - Pinxton Arm (new line)" (now named as "Smotherfly Wide") mean here? I'm confused - as this stretch of waterway has had or is hoping to have at least 3 uses - a previously one as a diversion for the Erewash du... |
| SkegHammer | See: http://tinyurl.com/y6v8a5le Feel free to update tags if appropriate. Rgds //Mike |
| SkegHammer | See also: http://tinyurl.com/yal3n4u4. A small scale map generated back in 2012 from the tags here: http://tinyurl.com/yar46lde |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks - so it's supposed to indicate bits that are disconnected, but are usable in some way as a canal?The bottom bit of Smotherfly isn't (I retagged that as drain because that's closer to what it is now). The top bit is probably wide enough, but there's no way to get a boat in and out.The C... |
| SkegHammer | I think probably disused=yes if it's not open to the public. I can't remember what info I had that caused me to tag it as no:isolated. Rgds //Mike |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks - I'll review the local ones to see if any others need changing. |
|
| 49804213 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Can you explain a little bit what you mean by "Correcting international waters for Ceuta and Melilla"? As you're no doubt aware it's a sensitive issue, and all sides of the discussion will want to understand what's happened here, including changes to n... |
| arm87 | Hello Andy, thanks for the welcoming!I meant to say "territorial waters" (12nm). The lines for the maritime boundaries of Ceuta and Melilla were there already, but overwritten in a way that they seem internal Moroccan waters and mentioning a conflict that really doesn't exist. This is ... |
|
| 49748659 | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and long... |
| UPegasus | Hello!I tried to make online edits, using Vespucci. It's unfamiliar to me and some data may be wrong.It's good that you quickly noticed inaccuracies and made the necessary changes. I'll try to be more careful.Thank You.Igor |
| SomeoneElse | No problem (it's not your fault - likely your phone hadn't got a location yet).Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 49769473 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 49744503 | SomeoneElse | Unfortunately, and surprising as it meay seem, wikipedia isn't actually a valid source for OSM! |
| Joxit | Okay, is the world factbook good enough for OSM? |
| SomeoneElse | No idea - what licence is it made available under? |
| Joxit | It's in the public domain. Here is the statement : The Factbook is in the public domain. Accordingly, it may be copied freely without permission of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/docs/contributor_copyright.html |
| SomeoneElse | That'd be OK licence-wise, sure. I'm not entirely convinced about the need for "square kilometer" values (since they're derivable from the boundaries) but, meh. |
|
| 49285785 | SomeoneElse | Not sure how it happened, but Alsager managed to turn into a Domino's Pizza place here - see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-thenorth/2017-June/thread.html for more info. It's fixed now. |
| joe egg | Not sure what had happened. I have also just deleted an erratic point ( Dominic Pizza in middle of Civic Centre .I did some Alsager updates last week and deleted a number of Traffic lights at the end of cul de sacs in the Poppyfields and Hall Drive area. |
|
| 49503519 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Unfortunately something went a bit wrong here - part of a kerb http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439072999 got dragged across town and joined to an underground river http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170048648 . I've moved it back, so no harm done.Best Regards,\... |
|
| 49703456 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 49668409 | SomeoneElse | Oops - I think that POI+ on your phone doesn't have a location. You've added this cafe in the middle of the Atlantic! This happened the last time you used POI+, so I'd suggest that you don't use it again, at least until https://github.com/davidchiles/osm-poi-editor-iOS/issues/12 is fixed.Other o... |
|
| 44525055 | SomeoneElse | I suspect that the former railway at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32678501/history has grown an extra tree_row tag by mistake? |
| dudone | Thanks for spotting this. I've removed the tag.Dudley |
|
| 49627026 | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and long... |
| Tomas Straupis | After some time editing I made a mistake and instead of deleting object from relation, I deleted whole data layer, which ment all my edits. So I opened JOSM autosave file and used that for further edits. This could have caused the 0 lat/lon. Sorry for that. (now I'm thinking JOSM could have a rule i... |
| Tomas Straupis | I've checked the saved .osm file and it does contain one node with negative id (new node) and lat/lon=0/0 and action 'modify'...This node was not included in any object in that .osm file.I have no idea how it ended up there. I was not using JOSM "add point at coordinates" functionality... |
|
| 49615304 | SomeoneElse | You've just uploaded the learnosm test data to OSM again! As I said in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49566338 , please don't do that. |
|
| 49598796 | SomeoneElse | Hello ccityplanner12,The tagging on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/925374644 seems a bit odd - it seems to have a ref set to a Youtube video.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 43944517 | SomeoneElse | Oops - something gone wrong with the merging that created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35542400/history . It now has "lcn_ref=1;2;2" and "lcn=proposed;yes;yes".Are you OK to split it again and reapply the old tags or would you like me to do it?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 14643082 | SomeoneElse | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201042775/history is tagged as "historic=f". I guess that this is a typo for something?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 44516898 | SomeoneElse | Hi JonS,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460552576/history is tagged as "historic=f" - is that a miskeying of the other key highway=footway?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 49566338 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because a copy of the learnosm test data was accidentally added there.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 49526098 | DaveF | Please refrain from adding not existing features. As noted previously there's a likelihood they'll be removed, which would be a waste of your time. Note comment about historical data: http://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome.html |
| SomeoneElse | @SNLA this has been mentioned on the talk-gb list - https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-June/020317.html . If you want to engage with the GB OSM community, that's probably the best place to do it, and also one of the best places to ask for advice about whatever it is that you're ... |
|
| 49515274 | Yorvik Prestigitator | I think you might be confusing the old Travelling Man shop, at 54 Goodramgate, which is vacant with their new shop at 74 which is where they are now trading from (unless they have closed down in the past 3 days) |
| SomeoneElse | Quite possibly - I didn't mark the position; was just surprised that it was shut. |
|
| 18277343 | SomeoneElse | Hi,On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42966910/history you've added a wikipedia link from a 707 parked at Hamburg to the wikipedia page for Boeing 707s in general. This doesn't make a lot of sense. If there's a wikipedia page for this specific example of a 707, then of course it would make sen... |
|
| 49520039 | SomeoneElse | Hi,I've removed the wikipedia tag you added here because the wikipedia page for an abstract concept ("null island") isn't relevant to a physical buoy floating in the ocean. Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 49515202 | SomeoneElse | The sign on the side says just "Travelodge"; their website suggests an official name of "Travelodge York Central Layerthorpe". |
|
| 49401905 | ndm | Hi, I think something isn't right with "The Pump Rooms and Stall Street -- they seem to have an odd shape now? |
| DaveF | Hi Syvanne Welcome to OSM could you clarify what it is your trying to add? Most visible extents of the mediaeval wall are mapped. OSM is a database of current entities. If you wish to record historical data I recommend having a read of this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_M... |
| Syvanne Aloni | Hi DaveF,Thank you for pointing this out to me. I have tried using OHM but the website seems down at the moment. Do you know anything about this? |
| DaveF | Unsure of OHM's status, but OSM is not the place for razed entities. Please feel free to add any examples that still exist, adding appropriate tags. Could you also have a look at the problems NDM flagged up. Thanks. |
| Syvanne Aloni | Hi DaveF, I have clarified and I am able to use OSM for mapping my data as OHM is not yet compatible with other software which I need to use. I am working with the Pleiades Gazetteer, the Institute of Classical Studies and the Roman Society to create a map of Aquae Sulis using Archeological journals... |
| DaveF | HiWho did you discuss the addition of historical data to OSM with? Lack of features in other software is not a valid reason to add it to OSM. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_featuresI've had a brief read of Pleiades. I see no mention of... |
| ndm | I think it probably needs to be raised on the talk-gb mailing list and maybe with the data working group -- they were great at removing edits in Bristol that added the historic HTV studio and icerink. It would be better to get some clarity -- rather than risk wasteing time on edits that could well b... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi - just for info - I've undone a node drag / node join that connected the end of the Cotswold Way to the corner of the Pump Rooms in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49514046 (based on the geometry change highlighted by http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=49401905 ).Best Regards... |
|
| 49473599 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea ho... |
|
| 49318614 | SomeoneElse | Sherwood Cottage doesn't self-identify as a guest house; just as a bed and breakfast. I've corrected the tagging. |
| Walter Schlögl | Do you know, what the wiki says about that?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atourism%3Dbed_and_breakfastUse tourism=guest_house instead. |
| SomeoneElse | Well the wiki says a lot of things... Unfortunately it's not always a good indicator of how people map; just how one particular wiki editor (the last one to edit the page) thinks that people should map.The discussion on the tagging list back in 2013 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagg... |
|
| 49436385 | SomeoneElse | Oops - perhaps it was an accident, but this changed the name of the country "Vietnam" to "China". I've changed it back.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| SomeoneElse | 糟糕 - 也许这是一个意外，但是这个国家的名字“越南”改为“中国”。 我已经改回来了最好的祝福，Andy Townsend，代表OSM的数据工作组。 |
|
| 49228311 | kreuzschnabel | May I ask why you changed the A46 classification from trunk to primary? According to http://ukroads.wikia.com/wiki/2-digit_primaries, it’s a primary A-road, which should be tagged highway=trunk in the UK while highway=primary means the "standard" A roads. |
| LAW3 | The section I upgraded to primary, was upgraded to a dual carriageway, and to the best of my knowledge is now classed as a primary road. (As parts of the A46 are)Aerial photography is still showing single carriageway/work in progress, so those who don't live 200 metres away may still class it as... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi LAW3, and welcome to OSM!The general rule in the UK for trunk roads and primary roads is green signs == trunk; white signs == primary.In OSM a trunk road fits between motorway and primary, so a change from trunk to primary is a "downgrade", not an upgrade. The A46 (especially post ... |
| LAW3 | Cheers for explaining Andy. Pretty new to all this, Will change it when I get chance. |
| SomeoneElse | No problem - any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask! |
| SK53 | Will just add that around Flintham this section of road was updated just as soon as practicable after it opened, see my blog post from 6 years ago: http://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2011/05/along-fosse-way-mapping-new-road.html |
|
| 49384416 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 49342085 | Carnildo | What are you trying to do that involves drawing large, untagged outlines? |
| SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that it got uploaded by mistake. I've reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49371802 .Best Regards, Andy (DWG) |
|
| 49362196 | SomeoneElse | Hello,I see that you are adding and then deleting data here. If you're still testing, please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | (Traduzione automatica)Ciao,Vedo che state aggiungendo e poi eliminando i dati qui. Se stai ancora testando, non aggiungere i dati di prova al server OpenStreetMap Live. Se vuoi un server di test, forse https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ funziona per te?I migliori saluti,Andy |
|
| 47826282 | NorthIsland | I would not map pavements as footpaths unless there is a significant grass strip between the road and the path - or if the path is a cycle route - any opinion? |
| Alex McKee | Well, as a pedestrian I like to know if there's a path to walk on. There's not always. The specific tag - highway:footway or highway:path is something I always wonder about, I used to prefer highway:path as footway was reserved for public footpaths in the early days of OSM. |
| SomeoneElse | Another option for pavements (where there isn't a significant area of grass) is a "sidewalk=both/left/right" tag on the road itself. An example mapped like that in Gloucester is Saw Mills End: https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=17&lat=51.864487&lon=-2.21097 . |
|
| 49183572 | SomeoneElse | This changeset adds shelters in the middle of the sea such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4891030217This seems unlikely - can you please explain how this happened?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| Geothings Inc | The wrong object is deleted. |
| Geothings Inc | The latitude and longitude missed their hundred-number. |
| SomeoneElse | Given that you've added so many invalid objects in the wrong place (such as the ones in the middle of the sea) how do we know that the ones on land are in the correct place? |
| SomeoneElse | Re "The latitude and longitude missed their hundred-number." how did that happen? |
| Geothings Inc | The raw data source is from Taiwan government, and there may be some incorrect data in it. We will do data clean up later. |
| SomeoneElse | One of the reasons why it's important to discuss an imort before it happening is so that people can look at the data and check for this sort of problem before it happens. |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49441534 where the changeset comment is: Discussion on changeset 49183572 seems to have stalled, and there are still objects such as node 4891030183 in the middle of the sea, so reverting these undiscussed edits (where they haven't been ... |
|
| 49271332 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea ho... |
|
| 49270768 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea ho... |
|
| 49182642 | Supaplex | 跑到印尼了 |
| SomeoneElse | Hello GeoThingsCan you please explain 1) why objects in Indonesia were edited by an edit allegedly restricted to Taiwan?2) What the licence associated with "EMIC open data" actually says?3) Where this edit was discussed with the TW community?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behal... |
| Geothings Inc | 1) It is the wrong position of this object, and it is fixed just now.2) EMIC, Central Emergency Operation Center , is the emergency operations center in Taiwan which is activated by the appropriate central authority of Taiwan in the event of emergency situation. The center is operated by the Natio... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi GeoThings,Thanks for your reply. Any import must follow the rules set out at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines . Can you please "fill in the gaps" and do the things that you have not yet done?Best Regards,Andy |
| Geothings Inc | Thank you for your reminder. We are working in progress. |
| Geothings Inc | The messed up data points are cleaned up! OSM wiki page for this import will be published soon. |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49441534 where the changeset comment is: Discussion on changeset 49183572 seems to have stalled, and there are still objects such as node 4891030183 in the middle of the sea, so reverting these undiscussed edits (where they haven't been ... |
|
| 49196299 | SomeoneElse | This changeset adds shelters in the middle of the sea such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4892097822This seems unlikely - can you please explain how this happened?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| SomeoneElse | Also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4892165031 (near the Philippines). |
| Geothings Inc | The two objects are fixed and moved to the right place. |
| SomeoneElse | How did the data get added in the wrong place originally? |
| Geothings Inc | The raw data source is from Taiwan government, and there may be some incorrect data in it. We will do data clean up later. |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49441534 where the changeset comment is: Discussion on changeset 49183572 seems to have stalled, and there are still objects such as node 4891030183 in the middle of the sea, so reverting these undiscussed edits (where they haven't been ... |
|
| 49262683 | SomeoneElse | Hi gorstak,Is this change something that you've discussed with the Kosovan community? Obviously you're aware of the political significance here. Also in OSM you'll notice that there is a very wide variety of name styles and languages in use, though most places do omit the "Republic..."... |
| gorstak | Hi Andy,I have not discussed with the Kosovo community.Because of bypassing the political significance I sugest to use the title of Kosovo.This is a compromise because some countries consider that Kosovo is part of Serbia.Kosovo not recognized five EU countries : Spain Greece Slovakia Roma... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi Milos,For the avoidance of doubt, the policy that OSM uses for territories where there are disputes is http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf , which says among other things: 'The OpenStreetMap community operates under the &l... |
|
| 49214137 | SomeoneElse | Hi,You've made a tag change to these items, but are you and the rest of the TW community happy that the location of new items in TW is correct? The changeset that added them https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49196299 added many other objects in the middle of the sea - have you checked the l... |
| SomeoneElse | （自動翻譯）嗨，您已經對這些項目進行了標籤更改，但是您和TW社區的其他成員對TW中新項目的位置是否正確？ 添加他們的變更集https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49196299在海中添加了許多其他對象 - 您是否檢查了您在此處修... |
|
| 48756035 | SomeoneElse | (re previous comment about mechanical edit of landuse=farm) http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2818914916/history is one in an area that I do know, and I certainly wouldn't describe it as a "place=farm". The last time I was there was a while ago, but I suspect it's still operational and sh... |
| SomeoneElse | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2699887733 is another one - it's a bit longer ago that I was there, but I don't remember anywhere that I'd describe as "place=farm" SE of Witham. |
| kreuzschnabel | You see me quite baffled to learn that place=farm does not describe a farm. It seemed quite plain to me so far. I certainly did not do a mechanical edit, I only assumed this to be the proper tagging for remote farms. As this seems to be not the case, maybe we should consider a revert while I’m... |
| SK53 | place=farm is generally not regarded as a valid/useful tag in the UK. Standard practice is to map actual farms with landuse=farmyard and ones which are now residential (lots) with landuse=residential. Sometimes place=locality may also be used if widely used (remote highland areas). In most of lowlan... |
| SomeoneElse | Re "place=farm does not describe a farm" - presumably it's a farm (based on the previous landuse=farm tagging); the thing that's in doubt is whether it's any sort of "place" or not. Of the couple of dozen farms nearest to me the only one that I can think of that might deserve th... |
| kreuzschnabel | Given my edit was that wrong, it would be easy to retrieve all node["place"="farm"](user:"kreuzschnabel")(newer:"2017-05-14T00:00:00Z") from overpass-turbo and retag them to landuse=farm. That should install the previous state, as if I’d never touched th... |
| SomeoneElse | An Overpass query would grab all the pre-existing place=farm as well, of which there were quite a few in Lincolnshire, which this changeset covers. |
| kreuzschnabel | It wouldn’t grab them unless they were wrongly double-tagged both landuse=farm and place=farm previously. My changesets definitively did not touch anything else than landuse=farm, so nodes tagged place=farm only would not be affected. |
| kreuzschnabel | My proposed query would affect 48 nodes in (roughly) Lincolnshire: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pqk, out of 6,446 total: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pql |
| kreuzschnabel | Sorry, bbox is not included in shortlink. So it’shttp://overpass-api.de/api/interpreter?data=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A25%5D%3B%28node%5B%22place%22%3D%22farm%22%5D%28user%3A%22kreuzschnabel%22%29%28newer%3A%222017%2D05%2D14T00%3A00%3A00Z%22%29%2852%2E609719391566%2C%2D0%2E8843994140625%2... |
| SomeoneElse | Ah OK; Are you going to change these back then?Obviously there's then a survey job to do to choose between landuse=farmyard, landuse=residential, landuse=industrial place=farm etc., but that can be done later (along with the existing place=farm nodes). |
| kreuzschnabel | Done in CS #49137101. - 2,723 single nodes "place=farm" within the entire UK which have been last edited by me after May 13th have been retrieved through overpass-turbo and exported to JOSM (none in N.Ireland, a dozen in Scotland, the rest in Wales and England).- They have all been... |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks! |
|
| 49097958 | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.Have you any idea how incorrect latitude and longitude values could have got... |
| Cascafico | I Guess it was my mistake: I created a new level (CTRL-N) adding a foo node Just to see which tags JOSM preset adds for guidepost, and I forgot to delete it before upload other stuff.Sory, I'll delete it ASAP. |
| SomeoneElse | Ah - OK. Thanks for that. |
|
| 49050533 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 49036708 | SomeoneElse | Hello,This is a huge changeset. I can see from whodidit that something has changed near me, but how do I find out what and why? How do you know that the changes that you have made actually match the situation on the ground? |
|
| 48865806 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Re the "not showing on map" issue, it might help to have a read of https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/178/how-often-does-the-main-mapnik-map-get-updated . The four different maps on the OSM website actual update at different rates (the "stan... |
|
| 48989823 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea ho... |
|
| 48969623 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 48972246 | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just checking - you've deleted a restaurant at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2572860428/history - is it really no longer there? What is in its place?Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | Hola,Sólo está comprobando que has borrado un restaurante en http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2572860428/history - ¿ya no está? ¿Qué hay en su lugar?Atentamente,Andy |
|
| 48972260 | SomeoneElse | Hello H2Olima00,This changeset, like most of your other changesets, just has a comment "Correcciones". This doesn't help other mappers understand what changes were made and what the source was.Please do use meaningful changeset comments! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_c... |
| SomeoneElse | Hola H2Olima00,Este conjunto de cambios, al igual que la mayoría de sus otros conjuntos de cambios, sólo tiene un comentario "Correcciones". Esto no ayuda a otros mapeadores a entender qué cambios se hicieron y cuál fue la fuente.¡Por favor utilice com... |
|
| 48966337 | SomeoneElse | Hello H2Olima00,In this changeset you have changed the some of the names associated with Morocco http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630439 to "Spain". See http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=48966337 for the tag changes.I'm guessing that this was accidental (the border ... |
| SomeoneElse | Hola H2Olima00,En este changeset has cambiado algunos de los nombres asociados a Marruecos a "España". Http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630439 Consulte http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=48966337 para ver los cambios de etiquetas.Supongo que esto fue accidental... |
|
| 48889250 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 16823650 | SomeoneElse | I'd be very suprised if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197180533/history is spelt correctly - "Tollemach" normally has an "e" on the end. The comment above says "double checked" - but with what? |
| Gavrielo | Then change it if you are sure - I revised road structure via satellite image - there was no way to double check the road name for Tollemach so I left that name as it was originally named.I only change names when 100% confirmed via photograph or seen by foot - I didn't name this road originally. |
| SomeoneElse | I've added a note so that someone local (or driving into Grantham from the A1) can map it. |
|
| 48834097 | kreuzschnabel | These were the last landuse=farm on the British Isles, so please don’t add new ones :-) And just in time we were, the new carto revision (which will not render landuse=farm any more) seems to have been switched active a few hours later. |
| trigpoint | It was never a pressing issue, farm/farmland is of dubious values consiting of vast areas armchaired by crayonists. It.adds very little value to those of us using OSM in rural areas.Many areas close to me were poorly drawn with connections to roads/rivers (not riverbank) and I had left them until ... |
| kreuzschnabel | I agree that landuse=farmland is of pretty little use (moreover, it’s not clearly defined from landuse=meadow, so there are areas already where these two collide). landuse=farmyard, on the other hand, is of higher value for the walker or bicyclist, and I wouldn’t really like to miss them... |
| trigpoint | I would agree farmyard is far more important than farmland itself. It is afterall the default state of non urban areas. It is a big shame that meadow has been so badly misused, it should be a rare but useful tag. Most.is simply pasture.If we are going to map farmland we should be doing it at a muc... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi kreuzschnabel,This looks very much like a mechanical edit. Have you ever actually visited e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2876566751/history to see if it deserves any sort of "place" tag?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
|
| 39850926 | SomeoneElse | Does any part of the Grantham Southern Relief Road exist? I don't remember seeing it, yet the tagging on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423236384/history would suggest that it is already operational.Best Regards,Andy |
| c2r | Yes and no - the physical properties mapped do exist but it is not operational. I surveyed this with GPS walking the route last year - photos of it are on SABRE. Signs are green as the A52 for the intermediate roundabout. However, road vehicles are currently blocked by concrete blocks. The A1 ju... |
|
| 48872391 | SomeoneElse | Hello cknight and welcome to OpenStreetMap!You've made a number of water related edits recently (and thanks for that - OSM relies on local people to get local stuff right) however you may want to check some of the tagging that you've used (for example reservoir vs basin). Another mapper's been in... |
|
| 48765219 | trigpoint | Hi, this is a big change and covers a large area. Please could you use meaningful changeset comments that tell other mappers what you were doing. Did you actually look at every one of the 11 pages of ways you have changed.I am sure that if as you say you were fixing josm, you would not have touch... |
| ninjamask | I meant, that I used the validator in JOSM to fix issues like double nodes and other auto-fixable issues. After that i fixed some issues of ways with double segments. |
| SomeoneElse | Please don't use rely on the validator in JOSM without manually checking every change. The JOSM validator will get some things right, but it will get some edge cases wrong as well. |
|
| 48207427 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just for info, if you're wondering what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489926314 and the ways nearby are, they were the runways and taxiways of the former Eastmoor Aerodrome (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAF_East_Moor ). I presume that they are little more than gravel tracks now, th... |
|
| 48739323 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 43749373 | SomeoneElse | Hello,I think that something has gone wrong here. You've set the wikidata ID of both http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/195384 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/88077 to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q23098 .They're different entities on the ground. Can you explain how you actually ... |
| SomeoneElse | Likewise http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/957520 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/957519 have been assigned the same wikidata ID. In this case should they perhaps share one relation that has the same wikidata ID? |
| nyuriks | SomeoneElse, thanks, good catch. I'm trying to get the Wikipedia and Wikidata tags in sync. Seems that the Wikipedia tag have been set to an identical value on both. I will investigate - maybe only one of them should have it? |
| nyuriks | SomeoneElse, I fixed the first one - it should have had a different Wikidata ID, as well as a different (more prescise) Wikipedia link. http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/195384 I cannot figure out why the second pair have identical WP and WD links, without being identical. The WP article doesn'... |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks - the Administrative Derbyshire's wikidata link looks OK (the sv:wikipedia page looks a bit rubbish, but we'll gloss over that - a wikipedia problem, not an OSM issue).As things currently stand I don't think http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/957520 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/relat... |
| nyuriks | Hi, thanks for looking into it!The first issue is really about Wikipedia vs Wikidata linking -- sometimes WP article covers both the village and civil parish, while WD item claims it is both, but it is really about just one meaning. Do we really want to link to both is an open question - IMO only ... |
| SomeoneElse | Re "Do we really want to link to both is an open question" it would probably make sense not to link to either if the thing that you're linking from in OSM is something else entirely. To be honest, I'm still struggling understand what I asked at the top - "what you're actually trying ... |
| nyuriks | I posted a long reply to https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56436 but it is pending moderator approval. I tried to explain both my method and reasoning. I simply locked the volatile Wikipedia link as a Wikidata ID - I have not touched the objects that did not have a Wikipedia tag alrea... |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks - I'm sure that the post will be approved shortly. |
| nyuriks | SomeoneElse - https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618646#p618646 |
| nyuriks | fixed two more dups - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43815558 - the rest (957519,957520 - Barnby Moor CP, and 1976182,4077796,1976184 European walking route E2 - seems legit. We don't need to have a perfect 1:1 between wikidata and osm - just like WP links, multiple objects in OSM can point... |
| SomeoneElse | It's been over 3 weeks now - are you going to fix the errors in this changeset? Some examples noted above, but there are many others. |
| nyuriks | SomeoneElse, yes, I am working on it. You can always reach me on IRC - "yurik". |
| SomeoneElse | Well, It's been over 5 months now - are you going to fix the errors in this changeset? The Dunham-on-Trent example is still wrong, but there are many others. |
|
| 36092421 | SomeoneElse | Hello Eugenip22,A recent diary entry http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/n76/diary/41274#comments has suggested that Txakur kalea https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219699471/history is actually labelled in both Basque and Spanish. The history shows that it had a "name" (set to the Spanish... |
| SomeoneElse | (Gutxi gorabeherako itzulpena)Kaixo Eugenip22,azkenaldiko egunkari sarrera bat http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/n76/diary/41274#comments iradoki du Txakur kalea https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219699471/history hori benetan bai euskaraz etiketatu eta Espainiako. historia erakusten du "... |
| SomeoneElse | (Traducción aproximada)Hola Eugenip22,Una reciente entrada del diario http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/n76/diary/41274#comments ha sugerido que Txakur kalea https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219699471/historia está etiquetado en euskera y Español. La historia muestra que ... |
|
| 48737910 | SomeoneElse | Just checking (in the light of previous edits) that you have actually surveyed this and verified that the name really isn't "Forest" here? I know there is a tendancy for some OSM mappers to assign "name=description", but it's always good to check.For example, I live only about... |
|
| 48674082 | SomeoneElse | The changeset comment "Buildings" doesn't seem to reflect the actual changes made here.Could you explain in a bit more detail what changes were actually made? |
| Maturi0n | Sorry, I was lazy and didn't addjust my edit comment. I was actually only adding the name of Abkhazia in the Adyghe language, which is closely related to Abkhaz and used to be spoken in the areas bordering Abkhazia. |
| SomeoneElse | Ah, OK - thanks. |
|
| 48335637 | SomeoneElse | Hello Müritz-Nationalpark,Lots of people have been trying to get in contact with you about the changes that you are making:http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5105649You haven't replied to any of these since January. Please do take the time to reply to these co... |
| SomeoneElse | (Ungefähre Übersetzung)Hallo Müritz-Nationalpark,Viele Leute haben versucht, mit Ihnen über die Änderungen in Kontakt zu treten, die Sie machen:Http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5105649Sie haben seit Januar keine davon beantwortet. Bitt... |
| Nakaner | Hallo Müritz-Nationalpark,ich habe den Eindruck, dass du hier versuchst, die Karte deinen Wünschen entsprechend zu säubern. Ich dachte eigentlich, dass solche Zeiten vorbei sind. Ich möchte dich daher bitten, die deine Löschungen durch georeferenzierte Fotos zu belegen.\... |
| Nakaner | Hallo Müritz-Nationalpark,deine Änderungen sind Thema im OpenStreetMap-Forum. Du kannst die Diskussion unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 verfolgen und bist eingeladen, dich zu Wort zu melden. Du kannst dich dort mit deinem OSM-Benutzerkonto anmelden... |
| Nakaner | Hallo Müritz-Nationalpark,wenn bis Freitag, 26. Mai 2017 keine Bemühungen erkennbar sind, die offenen Fragen zu klären, werde ich am Wochenende sämtliche Änderungen des Benutzerkontos Müritz-Nationalpark vorerst zurücksetzen.Viele GrüßeMichae... |
| Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this rever... |
|
| 30209979 | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that "ref=route" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338384368/history is a mistagging, but I've no idea what the correct tagging should be there :( |
| rorym | Yes that's incorrect. The Beara Way is a long distance hiking route around this pennisula ( http://www.irishtrails.ie/trail/Beara-Way/3/ ), So it should be tagged as that |
|
| 39794788 | ff5722 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335031789 has the tag 'abbatoir=cat'except for the fact that the key abbatoir is only used here, I don't think this business is really a slaughterhouse for cats. |
| SomeoneElse | Strange as it may seem, as far as I could tell from the signage, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335031789 really did appear to be an abbatoir specialising in cats. |
| ff5722 | Well there's a first for everything...I have to believe you on this :) |
| SomeoneElse | I was pretty surprised too :) |
|
| 48682589 | SomeoneElse | Hi,Any reason you've not set http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34570230/history back to "highway=secondary", which it was before the highway tag was removed?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 48580533 | SomeoneElse | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87406131/history was previously a forest; are you sure it's best tagged as a park and not a forest at all? |
| noteka | Totally. It was created at the end of 19.th century as regular planning Manor Park so it is not a forest. I get the confusion it has the name forest in it and all but this park is also called and more recognized as "Anniņmuižas parks".Description of park: http://www.citariga.lv/lat/ima... |
| AkageMuk | Hello, noteka and welcome in OSM. Although you perform right the same activity in OSM, as OSM user Diana777 peviously I should inform you about your mistakes.We welcome all new users and are glad to receive corrections to the map. At the same time, we expect the changes to improve the map, NOT S... |
| richlv | even the referenced page says "...forest, also called a park"; it also says "the local council plans to convert part of the forest into a park".this should be clarified/surveyed, and if some parts have been converted to a park, they should be mapped accordingly. the whole area ... |
| AkageMuk | For your information, edit war continues in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49133727 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49133791 |
|
| 48573672 | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and long... |
| mappreuss | Hi, I have no idea how this node was dropped…sorry about that. I wonder if this is a JOSM bug because it looks like you reverted other nodes at this exact location and I certainly didn't drop it manually. I don’t think I even zoomed over “null island” but thanks for fixing i... |
| SomeoneElse | To be honest, I think it's a JOSM bug too, since it's happened to a few other people too. So far no-one's been able to say "I did XYZ just before the problem appeared". |
|
| 46420842 | kreuzschnabel | Hi, I saw you re-tagged some small lanes hw=service + service=driveway. I took the liberty to change them to hw=unclassified since they do not lead to a single destination only. Please keep in mind that service=driveway should be used for small driveways from public roads into private property only ... |
| SomeoneElse | @kreuzschnabel Please don't change service to unclassified unless you've surveyed on the ground and can see that it's council maintained or otherwise obviously qualifies as an unclassified road. I can think of plenty of highway=service roads near me that lead to more that one property, and more tha... |
| kreuzschnabel | Sorry but which qualification does it actually need to be hw=unclassified? In the Wiki, I cannot find anything like "council maintained", I only find that hw=unclassified is the lowest category of public roads, while hw=service are mere access or special roads to particular places and not ... |
| dudone | I think you will find that Brownber is an old estate which has now been broken up into a number of old and new residences. This was my impression when I walked through it. I cannot be 100% sure but it looked very much like a driveway and not a unclassified highway. I walked along the path from th... |
| kreuzschnabel | Changed them back to hw=service but would still prefer to leave it that way. The driveway issue needs a general discussion IMHO since it’s interpreted in such different ways: some mappers use it as a default for any small lane, while for most renderers that makes them far less important than u... |
|
| 48572532 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 48531047 | SomeoneElse | Hello Rowland,You've not added a changeset comment here, so it's difficult to understand what's going on. Also, what does "created by=Tayberry" mean? Is that something that you've used to import or otherwise process this data?Please do use meaningful changeset comments so that other ... |
|
| 48452836 | SomeoneElse | Thanks! |
|
| 48533533 | SomeoneElse | Was this change following community discussion, as was suggested? Previous comments had suggested that a number of people thought that a "leisure=park" tag wasn't appropriate here. |
| AkageMuk | Dear, SomeoneElse! Unfortunately no discussion on this change was made within Latvian OSM community. The edit war seem to continue. |
|
| 48528605 | SomeoneElse | Thanks for fixing! |
|
| 48515996 | SomeoneElse | Just a quick note about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261166184 here - you've moved it to match the Bing imagery, but that is clearly offset with regard to the GPS traces. There are enough either side of the B6020 to align the imagery properly, and if you do that you'll notice that that buildin... |
| VlIvYur | You can't rely on gps traces in curves due to inertia. You need long straight intersecting lines. And You can find them on the East: Kingsway / Station street; on the West: Sutton road / Chapel street. And you'll see there no need to align images.Also there are no fresh gps traces here, and the av... |
|
| 48409154 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add "game features" such as a "Parque dos pokémon" to OpenStreetMap. If there's something really there on the ground and it's really called that then please map it, but if it only appears in a game, please don't!.Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | Hola,Por favor, no agregue "características del juego" como un "Parque dos pokémon" a OpenStreetMap. Si hay algo realmente en el suelo y es realmente llamado, entonces por favor, map, pero si sólo aparece en un juego, por favor, no !.Atentamente,Andy |
| PeteSport | Hi.I don't add "game features" such as a "Parque dos pokémon"... I have a mistake and my tablet's keyboard replace automatically the name: " Parque dos PEQUENOS" to "Parque dos POKEMONS"... in my lenguage ( Galician) "childrens" means "... |
| SomeoneElse | Haha - thanks for that. Are you going to fix the name? |
| AlbaKrlos23 | Yes, I fix the name to "Parque dos Pequenos" sorry and thank you to advise me.Best regards. |
| PeteSport | Hi,Ok. Thanks AlbaKrlos23 to fix the name. |
| AlbaKrlos23 | You´re welcome PeteSport |
|
| 48449696 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4838391421 really a picnic site within a building, or it it perhaps a bench or food court?Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | مرحبا،هو https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4838391421 حقا موقع نزهة داخل مبنى، أو أنه ربما مقعد أو محكمة الغذاء؟تحياتي الحارة،أندي |
|
| 48352481 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491030108/history but it seems to overlap and be a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263939032/history which has existed since 2014.Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | Halo,Anda telah menambahkan https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491030108/history namun tampaknya tumpang tindih dan menjadi duplikat https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263939032/history yang telah ada sejak tahun 2014.Salam Hormat,Andy |
|
| 48352134 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added "building=yes" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491026046 but it doesn't look like a building, just an area in which there are several buildings?Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | Halo,Anda telah menambahkan "building = yes" di https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491026046 namun tidak terlihat seperti bangunan, hanya area di mana ada beberapa bangunan?Salam Hormat,Andy |
|
| 48042765 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added a footpath https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488741439 . Are you sure that that actually exists, and that there is really no access from it to the junction of Pelham Road / Regent Street? Regent Street is sidewalk=both (or was the last time I went past it). Are you really say... |
| VlIvYur | Of course I'm not sure - at first, I have only Bing images.Second, sidewalk=* is a temporary tag and should be replaced by drawn highway=footway. After that sidewalk=* may be removed, so there will be only one footway.As for access from it to junction, I don't know local laws about crossing stre... |
| SomeoneElse | > Second, sidewalk=* is a temporary tag and should be replaced by drawn highway=footway. No, it's not a temporary tag. It's a permanent tag to indicate that a sidewalk that is part of the road infrastructure exists.Depending on the local environment it may be more appropriate to tag sidewa... |
| VlIvYur | Sorry, I was too far from Internetsidewalk=* are difficult to support (roll of tags on way) and didn't displays the real state of things. You can't tag slopes for wheelchair, different pavement, widths for sides etc. It's only path graph (for drivers) not map.Why (For what?) there are marked cro... |
|
| 48271977 | SomeoneElse | Hello MacaroniHomie,OpenStreetMap's a map of things that really exist, so if there isn't a meadow on your house, please don't map one there.Sorry about that...Best Regards,Andy |
| MacaroniHomie | It's okay. I got rid of it. There's no spawn points anyways. |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks! |
|
| 48448689 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure that there is no access from the road to the path at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4810318439 ?Best Regards,Andy |
| dmgroom_ct | I had considered that the footpath network adjacent to regent street was adequate to provide foot routing, but on reflection that nay not be the case, so I have removed the noexit tag and added a short section of footway |
| SomeoneElse | Does it actually match the on-the-ground situation though? I'm not convinced that there are two parallel footways either side of Regent Street (and I've seperately commented in a changeset of the user that added them).Have you been there to have a look? |
| dmgroom_ct | no, I've not |
| dmgroom_ct | But the Bing imagery does seem to show two parallel footways, at least at the part of Regent Street north of Hartley Road |
|
| 48450070 | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and long... |
|
| 44604841 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add "game features" such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4567649976 to OpenStreetMap. If there's something really there on the ground, map it, but if it only appears in a game, please don't.Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | Χαίρετε,Μην προσθέτετε "δυνατότητες παιχνιδιού" όπως το http:... |
|
| 48266814 | SomeoneElse | Hello Balakhadze,Can you please use more meaningful changeset comments than "Needed change"? That doesn't really explain what you did and why.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 48393284 | SomeoneElse | Personally I wouldn't set too much store by the OSM wiki :)If something looks like a cycleway, I'd map it as one.Cheers,Andy |
|
| 48372005 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are the name of all of these features such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491169857really called "Garden"?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 36985838 | kreuzschnabel | Some of these springs look more than suspicious to me – invisible on Bing imagery, right in the middle of fields. Where did that information come from? Would be great btw if you could comment your changesets (short description: what kinds of changes have been done), and specify your source... |
| SomeoneElse | Given that so much in this changeset such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3986928355 (and unfortunately many of this mapper's other contributions) is obviously rubbish then in the absense of any explanation I'd be tempted to just revert this. |
| kreuzschnabel | I strongly second this, just wanted to assume good faith first – maybe something went wrong in a well-purposed edit. |
|
| 48425478 | SomeoneElse | You might find that https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=14&lat=53.16751&lon=-1.08988 gives a better picture of Sherwood Pines (tree types, for example). |
|
| 47959634 | SomeoneElse | Can you explain what you mean by "fixed the tagging"? http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=47950158 shows a geometry change; did you verify that? If not, please don't make changes like this - it makes fixing things properly much harder.Please instead either let someone who ca... |
| nammala | Hi Andy, Here I changed the park tag to wood and I din't change any geometry. As per the imagery I changed to wood rather than park. From next time, I will definitely let the user know about this and wait for him to change and let others know about this.Thanks for flagging this Andy.Best R... |
|
| 48354795 | SomeoneElse | This follows on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48258464 - see the comment there. |
|
| 48337423 | ENB45 | See comment as to changeset 48337508 |
| SomeoneElse | Hi Chris,Welcome to OpenStreetMap!You've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108176084 so that it's not recognised as any kind of highway at all - presumably that was by mistake?Can you explain what you were trying to do?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 47950853 | trigpoint | Hi, please could you add some more detail to the artworks. A pub car park is an odd place for an artwork.Thanks Phil |
| ENB45 | Phil, I think this person is just messing about. There are a few changes by this person in the area. I have just cleaned up a set of paths that have been dragged all over the place in this users changeset, also with Artwork randomly placed that doesn't exist. |
| SomeoneElse | I've never been to that pub but I've commneted on another one that I don't think exists: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47950670 . |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48420321 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Pokemon-inspired edits and other fiction. Attempts to contact the mapper have failed. |
|
| 47950670 | SomeoneElse | Can you explain what "Old Ben" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4804532628 is? It's a while since I've walked down here but I don't remember anything at the end of this path.Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48420321 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Pokemon-inspired edits and other fiction. Attempts to contact the mapper have failed. |
|
| 34868496 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You have added 5 schools at exactly the same location at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3802693408 . This also appears to be in the middle of the road. Do these 5 schools occupy different parts of one large building? If so, please map the building and move the nodes to appropriate pla... |
|
| 48314612 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.Have you any idea how incorrect latitude and lo... |
| SomeoneElse | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap!Comme vous pouvez le voir à partir de la ligne orange autour de cette modification sur la carte à droite lorsque vous affichez le set de modifications sur le site OpenStreetMap, cela chevauche l'Atlantique car certaines données ont &eacut... |
| griffou83 | Hi Andy, yes I have an idea of the problem ; when I tried to add a node to an existing path, the app (JOSM) added a free node at (0,0) coordinates. I thought I suppressed it afterwards, but maybe it wasn't the case, that's why you saw it. It seems you already suppressed it.. ? |
| SomeoneElse | If you could reproduce it (maybe using the test server?) it'd be great to add an issue at https://josm.openstreetmap.de/newticket . I've seen it happen to a few people - they're happily mapping away in their home area and then oops! A node appears at 0,0. |
|
| 48325430 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.Have you any idea how incorrect latitude and lo... |
| SomeoneElse | Halo dan selamat datang di OpenStreetMap!Seperti yang dapat Anda lihat dari garis oranye di sekitar perubahan ini pada peta di sebelah kanan saat Anda melihat changeset di situs OpenStreetMap, itu tumpang tindih dengan Atlantik karena beberapa data tidak sengaja ditambahkan di sana.Sudahkah Anda... |
|
| 48320558 | SomeoneElse | Hello "Nikos Andreas Gls",Can you explain what "OSM operation and validation succesful" means?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 48231898 | SomeoneElse | As noted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1331 this mechanical edit is still technically flawed and legally questionable. In addition to all of the other issues already raised, you are performing multiple edits to objects for no apparent reason. |
|
| 48186273 | manoharuss | Hi osm update,This seems like automated edit to me with a custom script. Has this been discussed and documented? What is the source of this data?I have observed some issues with the edits.1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/338794056/history is a node of a way on a remote area. I don't s... |
| althio | Hi,I agree with manoharuss on this changeset, dear user "osm update".It seems like you rely too heavily on nodes ids.I would also suggest you use better changeset comments.Moreover you could try to reduce the successive numbers of versions for only adding tags to one object.\... |
| osm update | Hi, the source is http://min-go.hr/, but I've made a mistake in my script. I'm reverting changes. |
| SomeoneElse | Apparantly an otherwise untagged node on a footpath near me https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/339830304/history now sells LPG. Do I need to bring my own can?Regards,Andy(who as well as mapping footpaths moonlights for the Data Working Group) |
| ndm | Umm, http://min-go.hr seems to be based on Google Maps? Wouldn't that taint data from it? |
| osm update | No, it's not based on Google Maps. There are three json sources of information about gas stations and prices:- http://min-go.hr/cache/postajasve.json- http://min-go.hr/cache/vazeca-cijena.json- http://min-go.hr/api/web_api/web/obveznik |
| SomeoneElse | You have been blocked because you are continue to mechanically edit data without discussion. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1331 made clear the process that you must follow if you want to do this. The data that you have modified since this changeset will be reverted. Please re-read htt... |
|
| 47656314 | SomeoneElse | Thanks - I've always wondered what http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/698093265 was supposed to be! |
|
| 48190865 | Commodoortje | Zo te zien heb je hier helemaal gelijk.In de BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) staat dit schuurtje niet vermeld.https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#/?searchQuery=13%20Beatrixstraat%20Groenlo&resultOffset=0&objectId=1586100000021100&geometry.x=238701.... |
| SomeoneElse | @Commodoortje Interestingly Bing and Mapbox satellite both show the extension - it it really likely that it has been demolished, or is BAG perhaps just out of date here? |
| Commodoortje | Yes it is. BAG is in this case not actual. |
|
| 48094899 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain why you removed the detailed tags from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263723286/history and added it to the address node instead? Also, "reverted due to ignorance" isn't a very helpful changeset comment if, as here, the features were added by a new mapper.Best... |
| eggie | This was the last changeset in a range of lots of wrong and good tags. We got no response at the changesets. Only in a personal message. We askes the mapper to stop for the moment but we got no response. By the way I fixed this edit and all the informatie is at the adressnode now as an example for s... |
|
| 48145275 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Can you explain why you deleted the shops such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3715328045/history on this street? Are they really no longer there any more?Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | Bonjour et bienvenue à OpenStreetMap!Pouvez-vous expliquer pourquoi vous avez supprimé les magasins tels que http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3715328045/history commentaires sur cette rue? Sont-ils vraiment plus là plus?Cordialement,Andy |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48417098 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some deletions and other odd edits. An attempt to contact the mapper failed. |
|
| 48122711 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain the reason for the building deletions in here such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42558687/history ? That still exists on the imagery. Has it really been demolished?Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | העלא,קענען איר דערקלערן די סיבה פֿאַר דעם בנין דאָ: אַזאַ ווי אויסמעקונגען אין http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42558687/history? אַז נאָך יגזיסץ אויף די ימאַדזשרי. שוין טאַקע האָבן עס די... |
|
| 45729080 | SomeoneElse | Hi,I'd suggest actually checking these in a bit more detail before you mechanically edit them - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4300814810/history is clearly just garbage (and was the subject of a previous revert).Cheers,Andy |
| Aleks-Berlin | Hi Andy, actually the decision how far a fix should be is not htat easy. One the one hand we should "respect the work of others" (and not delete a likely bad name-tag). But I would also like to reach a state in OSM, that makes it more easy useable (less exceptions, country specific rules, ... |
|
| 48087689 | SomeoneElse | Just for info I've added a 0-hour block at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1328 and reverted to the pre-edit-war situation in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48114086 . |
|
| 40027234 | SomeoneElse | Please don't duplicate data - if something you're using to search for pubs doesn't find pubs mapped as ways it'll miss a lot of pubs (roughly a third in the UK - http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/tags/amenity=pub ) |
| Electric Monk | I suggest you go to Overpass Turbo and look at the example query that comes up. Points Of Interest are called "points" for a reason. |
| SomeoneElse | Er, OK....In http://overpass-turbo.eu/ if I click "wizard", type in "pub" and "build query" I get http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/oBt which searches for amenity=pub on nodes, ways and relations.Can you explain where you got the idea that POIs should be mapped as node... |
|
| 47403489 | SomeoneElse | Just checking - does the ISO code that you've added here apply to:1) The territory held by the Polisario Front2) The former state of Western SaharaAs you may be aware, there is more than one claim over the latter. If the answer is "2" then these iso codes don't belong here.Best Re... |
| geo_2016 | hi i'm sorry i think my "fix" was a bit too fast and not thought through entirely.should i or would your reverse it (delete the iso3166 code?) |
| SomeoneElse | Hi,I've already done it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47953850 .Thanks,Andy |
|
| 47981886 | SomeoneElse | Can you explain what you mean by "invalid layer tag"?Layer tags are relative, so "layer=-1" or "layer=-100" isn't any more valid or invalid than "layer=0" or an implied layer=0, if all crossing features have positive layer tags.What problem are you trying ... |
| wongataa | I should have put some more detail in. These layer tags were not used in conjunction with any other tags such as bridge or tunnel. The features in question could also be clearly seen at surface level on the satellite imagery and were tagged as layer -1. The layer tags were applied in error as the... |
| SomeoneElse | Again, to be clear, _layer tags are relative_. Layer 0 does _not_ imply ground level.Again, what _actual problem_ are you trying to solve? |
| trigpoint | There are more changes here than your stated incorrect layer.You have also changed oneway=-1 to oneway=yes on way 204098940 thus reversing the direction of travel for that section |
|
| 47947482 | trigpoint | Hi, please can you point me to where this mechanical edit was discussed?You seem to have mechanically armchaired layer=1 onto bridges with no survey, if you had you would have seen that the bridge should be at layer=0 and maybe whatever is below them needs a later=-1 where it is below ground level... |
| wongataa | All bridges need a layer tag of 1 or higher. This is detailed in the OSM wiki on the bridge page. It doesn't matter if the bridge is a simple plank or not. It is above ground level.In that mapillary link the bridge needs a layer tag as it crosses a river/canal. The layer is to show where a f... |
| SomeoneElse | Firstly - please take the wiki with a bucketload of salt :)Secondly - layer=0 doesn't imply ground level - layer tags are relative, so "All bridges need a layer tag of 1 or higher" is simply wrong. Also, although it is possible to infer relative level from imagery and other sources, i... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48258464 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical changes to layers. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1325 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=133272 |
|
| 43583909 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| lequack | Yes apologies for that Andy. It was a mistake, can I revert those additions? |
| SomeoneElse | It's OK; I've reverted them.Thanks,Andy |
|
| 48007382 | SomeoneElse | Hello,In this changeset you've changed the name of this place from the Armenian name to to an anglicized version of the the Azerbaijani name.Your changeset comment "Something wrong explained" unfortunately does not explain what the problem was and why you changed it.Could you explain... |
|
| 47992495 | SomeoneElse | Oops - you've added this one-node building in the middle of the Atlantic at latitude 0, longitude 0. I guess that this means that OsmAnd didn't have a valid location when you added it?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 46849184 | SomeoneElse | Hi Brian,You're still not using a separate import account, you're using a #gibberish changeset discussion comment and you're importing duplicates of existing data rather than conflating (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4734765468 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4149470376).Are you... |
| brianboru | I don't believe these are duplicate nodes but bus stops on opposite sides of the road, so conflation not appropriate. Duplicates are being reviewed manually to check which position is accurate I'm using my own account only to do a manual post-import review and cleanup of nodes. Not as neat as pur... |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks Brian.Just one question - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/wmca doesn't seem to be a valid account?Best Regards,Andy |
| brianboru | Sorry Andy - so used to abbreviating it. The username is West Midlands Combined Authority. This also came through on email this timme!Brian |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks Brian - and yay for email appearing! |
|
| 47924997 | SomeoneElse | Hello,In this edit you've deleted the clothes shop that was downstairs - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47924997 - was that deliberate?Best Regards,Andy |
| British Passports UK | Sorry, it may be by mistake I will delete my listingRegards Steve |
|
| 47434147 | SomeoneElse | Unfortunately this "fake park" that you deleted here was actually a school originally!https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23646951/historyI've reverted it and patched it up with P1.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 47784601 | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong with this import. The nodes are spread over the ocean...Also, "Adresse" and "Nom" are no common tags in OSM and should be properly tagged.Jan |
| SomeoneElse | @mueschel no reply here so I've reverted these additions and sent the user a message that they have to read before continuing editing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1320 .Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 47930917 | SomeoneElse | Er,You've deleted the weather buoy at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900/historyWas this intentional?Best Regards,Andy |
| nammala | Hi andy,This is accidental, It might have deleted when I was reverting this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47788862?node_page=2 , which has null island edits . Could you please bring back the buoy edits.Regards,nammala |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks - I've undeleted it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47952895 . |
| nammala | Thanks andy . |
|
| 47030425 | imagico | Hello Eva,your edits claims to be based on Bing imagery but Bing apparently has no coverage in this area. Could you explain the basis of this edit? |
| Eva Blue | Hi imagico, I figured that even without imagery I could make some improvements to the shoreline if there are sharp angles that are unreasonable for a shoreline. However you bring up a good point and I will avoid editing when no resources are available. Thank you. |
| SomeoneElse | Hi Eva,Please don't update OSM based on guesswork!Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 47114137 | woodpeck | You have aligned this one island with Bing imagery, but the three nearby islands were horribly out of sync with imagery and you haven't even made an attempt to repair them too. Why the focus on this one island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instruct... |
| James Millar | I found this island through a MapRoulette challenge, I’m part of a small group who are attempting to improve the alignment of these islands using MapRoulette and JOSM. |
| SomeoneElse | Hi James.There have been worrying changes such as this elsewhere; you simply can't rely on Bing imagery where it might be offset (which is anywhere that you don't have something else to corroborate it).Can you explain who the "small group" are? Your profile doesn't say anything abou... |
| James Millar | Hi Andy,We also use Mapbox, and by using a combination we can usually make improvements to these islands regardless of potential Bing offset. Alternatively we make the decision to not make any edits in an area (we do this often). Can you point me to some of the worrying changes? I can always fix t... |
| SomeoneElse | Re "worrying changes", you can see a discussion with comments at http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/imagico/diary/40759 .Also, you're saying "we" again. Who exactly are "we"?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 47898820 | SomeoneElse | Hi James, as per the comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47114137 can you explain how you know the alignment is correct here? Can you describe what you did to check it?Best Regards,Andy |
| James Millar | Hi Andy,Thanks for the comment.https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47898820 I think that this small island looks better now due to these changes. Do you know if Bing is offset here? It would be great to know for sure, but until then this feature has been improved significantly accor... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi James,Unfortunately "looks better" doesn't always mean "is better" - if it's in the wrong place, it's still wrong, like Monty Python's parrot with the "beautiful plumage" is still dead.In this case there don't seem to be any local GPS traces (even on the nearby h... |
|
| 47895813 | SomeoneElse | Hello,As explained previously (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44699065 ) Bing imagery may be out of date or offset. Can you explain what steps that you took here and in your other changesets in order ensure that this was not a problem?Best Regards,Andy |
| Kate Diaz | Hi Andy,Thanks for the comment. Do you have any resources that indicate that Bing is offset here or that the island has changed? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47895813 I believe that the island now better reflects reality due to my edits and that these changes improve the map incre... |
| TheSwavu | Bing imagery in this area is off by 4 to 5 m. |
| SomeoneElse | Re "resources that indicate that Bing is offset here" I'd offer "experience".Various things can be used to determine a Bing offset - underlying GPS traces and other imagery layers among them. I've certainly used the AGRI imagery together with GPS traces (my own and others) in ... |
|
| 47898251 | SomeoneElse | Hi,A month ago someone mentioned that Bing imagery might be offset (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46862647#map=15/60.5123/28.6651&layers=N ). Can you explain what you're doing here to avoid problems caused by offset imagery?Best Regards,Andy |
| Jason Roy | Hey Andy,Before this changeset, this island was traced badly. There were jagged edges which do not reflect reality. The changes I made were minor but do improve the outline as seen in achavi here:https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47898251 Do you have anything that shows Bing is... |
|
| 47885397 | SomeoneElse | Whilst can be contentious mapping temporary closures in OSM, I guess that 6 weeks of remaining closure is enough to make it worthwhile mapping it. |
|
| 39508436 | Jothirnadh | Hello JayCBR,Came across this changesets and found that you deleted the names of this street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278489664/historyYour changeset also didn't have any proper comment, so not able to quantify the reason of deleting these tags. Can you please specify the reason. Al... |
| JayCBR | well there is a restructuring of provincial roads in progress and this area is not complete yet (ΕΟ3β is a branch of the main way and havent decided on a name at the time)..i do most of my edits with P2 and when i save is because ram is running out, so no time for comments |
| SomeoneElse | Hi JayCBR,If you have to save in an emergency and aren't able to leave a suitable comment, you could always return to the changeset later and add a comment in the changeset discussion. That way other mappers will still be able to see what the changeset was about.Hope you don't mind me mentionin... |
|
| 47682574 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've tagged a cycleway here as "highway=Cykelväg". In order for everyone to be able to understand the data, you'll want to change this to "highway=cycleway.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 28734701 | SomeoneElse | Hello Lindisfarne,The tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327300037 suggest that it has been imported from an external source.Can you explain where it was imported from and what the licence for that was?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| JohanMax | Hello Andy,I used data from an forestryplan, originated from lantmäteriverket, fastighetskartan. My mistake, all the other datasets are from lantmäteriverket are free data but fastighetskartan are not. I have removed the data.Best regards,Johan |
|
| 22544906 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just trying to understand the "motor_vehicle=designated" on St Andrewgate http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69693516/history . This normally means "there's explicit signage or something else that indicates that motor vehicle traffic should go down here".Best Regards,A... |
| Yorvik Prestigitator | Hmm, that edit was 3 years ago, perhaps it was signed "access only", but since St A'gate (and surrounding streets) is effectively a dead-end for motor vehicles, that sems unecesssary. I will have another survey this week. |
| SomeoneElse | I didn't notice any signage on St Andrewgate itself last night, but TBH you wouldn't expect any since car access is from near the Black Swan. Cheers,Andy |
|
| 47663047 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Is "Edwinstowe Cricket Club" really a sports shop or actually a cricket club or cricket pavilion? I know you're a bit limited with MAPS.ME - it doesn't let you tag everything how you'd like to. If it isn't a shop let me know and I can change it to som... |
|
| 47648719 | SomeoneElse | Hi,Would it be possible to explain what "remove self intersecting section of area outline" means?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 47546592 | SomeoneElse | Just a quick point about "For standardisation (make it possible to filter for this), ":It's entirely possible to filter for whatever mappers tag things as, whatever you're using to consumer the data, For rendering, osm2pgsql supports lua (see https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneEls... |
| ti-lo | It's not about "to match an obscure scheme that on an unrelated web page that no-one is likely to read", it's about using a scheme which is easier to understand for the users (main Key shop=mototrcycle, sub-Keys motorcycle:*=*) and avoids confusion about different ways to tag the same thin... |
| SomeoneElse | If you're making changes based on a wiki page (that likely no-one else has read) you still need to follow the mechanical edit process https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct . It's not fair on mappers or data consumers just to change the structure of the data without tal... |
| ti-lo | I talked to the data consumers (which weren't consuming the "service" tags up to now). The major problem were the "motorcycle_repair" tags, which have also been "invented" without proper discussion, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle_repa... |
|
| 47649816 | will_p | Hi,What is the purpose of adding an elevation for an entire city? To me this usage of the ele tag seems likely to cause confusion, because the ele tag is usually used to provide an accurate elevation at a particular point, whereas this is something much more vague. Many different heights could b... |
| timwenzel98 | Hi Will,thank you for opening the discussion. The elevation for an entire city can be useful in some circumstances when using specific mobile apps (maps.me for instance), i added the official elevation of a town, each for their own measurement. It of course would be nice to have the elevation of... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi Tim,Where did you measure the elevation? If you didn't measure it, where did you copy the information from?Regards,Andy |
| SK53 | There is no such thing as an official elevation of towns/cities in the UK. This seems to be more common in Europe and is indeed often shown on conventional topo maps. In Britain only spot heights are shown.Adding an ele on an area is furthermore absurd. Elevations in Nottingham vary between arou... |
|
| 47472543 | SomeoneElse | Hi poornibadrinath,As can be seen from http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=234061921 this town has been through a number of name changes over the years!I'm not convinced that having anglicised versions of Azerbaijani or Armenian names here makes sense. These were added in the previouse cha... |
| poornibadrinath | Hi Andy, When I came across this changeset and searched for the name Agdara, a wikipedia entry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aghdara_(town) had two names for the same place: Aghdara and Mertakert. That's why I added the alt name tag. Wasn't aware that this town was always referred to as Mertaker... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi Poornima,Thanks for your reply. I don't think that this town "was always referred to as Mertakert" - I suspect that it's official name will have varied depending on which side of the border it happened to be at the time. http://military.wikia.com/wiki/Operation_Goranboy suggests tha... |
| poornibadrinath | HI Andy,Thanks for the clarification. I checked around to see if there are any other concrete sources but couldn't find any. I agree that may be the version 24 remains the best compromise on names. I will go ahead and change the name to how it was in your changeset. Thanks again.Best,Poornim... |
|
| 47604117 | SomeoneElse | The untagged names in here (e.g. "Antenatal") aren't errors, they're just placeholders for department locations that will need tags adding once I (or someone else) has figured out a sensible way to tag them. |
|
| 47432195 | SomeoneElse | Hi - just for info, I've changed the wiki link from here from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Nagorno-Karabakh to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Nagorno-Karabakh%20Republic , because that's what this entity is (admin level 3 for disputed statelet, not the region, or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... |
|
| 47546572 | SomeoneElse | This looks remarkably like a mechanical edit (just changing one tag to another). Was it discussed anywhere? |
|
| 47553864 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!One small thing - you're naming each changeset "small corrections". This doesn't really help explain to other mappers what change you're making and what the source of that change was. It'd help other mappers if you could explain in a little more detai... |
| dgitto | Please do not change names. The name was via 4 novembre, as stated in the wiki page about the "name with dates" in italy (linked to you lot of times).Moreover, if you change the tag name, pay attention to change accordingly the tag addr:street into each housenumber |
| オプンストリトマップ | OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe th... |
| オプンストリトマップ | in this street af acitrezza signal there's it is written "Via IV November" with roman numbers, not the common numbers for several historic and cultural reasons. i've been there and i know it. and the local people from acitrezza are just fine with it. Via 4 Novembre could be an alt_name |
| dgitto | Ahh sorry. You are YOU. Sorry. Cheers |
| オプンストリトマップ | roman numbers again https://www.tripadvisor.it/Restaurant_Review-g1028935-d10750544-Reviews-Pizzeria_Ai_Quattro_Canti-Aci_Castello_Province_of_Catania_Sicily.html |
| オプンストリトマップ | roman numbers in historic date name streets again and again https://tinyurl.com/lnglh85 |
|
| 47461811 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Just a couple of points - you've aligned two islands to Bing here, and they're a long way apart, so your changeset covers most of 4 continents. It'd be better if you could try and restrict the area covered by changesets so that everyone's "history" lis... |
|
| 26752192 | SomeoneElse | I notice that this large changeset removes the "drinkable=yes" tag from e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/966339776/history . Was this change discussed anywhere so that anyone previously rendering "drinkable=yes" on a map would no to update it before this change was made? |
| SomeoneElse | Also, the changeset comment "water" really isn't very descriptive. Much more helpful would have been something like "mechanical editing all amenity=drinking_water to remove any drinkable=yes tags". |
| escada | Was there any reaction on your questions ? Why wasn't this changeset reverted ? |
| philippec | Maybe place a note for Polyglot. That is his territory. |
| SomeoneElse | @FrViPofm - can you think of a good reason why this should _not_ be reverted? |
| FrViPofm | @SomeoneElse - can you think of a good reason why this should be reverted? |
| SomeoneElse | @FrViPofm Yes, it looks like a mechanical edit that removes tags added by other mappers. |
| philippec | I think that SomeoneElse deserves a good explanation. |
| FrViPofm | "looks like" but may not be...----------For one who read the doc (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/drinking_water#Current_situation) they were 3384 drinkable=* at 2014-04-15. This changeset made 318 changes. Les that 10%. A mechanical edit on less than a tenth ?... |
| SomeoneElse | I'm sorry but you still haven't explained exactly _what_ you have changed or _why_ you changed it. For example, why did you change http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/942584694/history but not, say, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1261454510 ? Assuming that you haven't visited all of these places... |
| FrViPofm | I don't remember, it's more than 2 years ago... But I'm pretty sure I had enough knowledge on those nodes, with the tags themselves, according to the wiki. e.g. amenity=drinking_water implies drinking_water=yes. As junction=roundabout implies oneway=yes.According to Rudolph mentions, they have bee... |
|
| 47433128 | SomeoneElse | Thanks for fixing! |
|
| 47478230 | SomeoneElse | Hello,"minor edits / repetition / redundancy / abreviation / duplication / contraction / shortening / cleaning up overbloating / " isn't really much more informative than "minor edits".I really don't understand why you have made https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45547650/hist... |
|
| 47433613 | agnostico | This is not a generic "Ufficio Postale", but a postal agency called "Agenzia Sailpost". It's a private postal service and the name tag should reflect this fact.Please think about it. |
| dgitto | This is vandalism. Not "minor edits". Because you know that other mappers in the community don't via agree with you |
| mxrev8 | OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe th... |
| SomeoneElse | @mxrev8 - you seem to be adding your "OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies" text in such a way that makes _you_ look like a bully: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5571621Rather than keeping repeating it, I'd suggest engaging with the rest of the comm... |
| mxrev8 | the post office "Ufficio Postale" of Poste Italiane is right in front of Sailpost, which either one of them was not marked. i wonder if Sailpost franchises should use the "Post Office" symbol or rather a shop symbol. of course, since market liberalization of couriers, all courier... |
| dgitto | The name is not "ufficio postale" as everyone knows.This edit will be reverted |
|
| 47427854 | SomeoneElse | Oops (again) :) |
|
| 47439325 | SomeoneElse | Placenames in OSM should be in the commonly spoken local language. If you want to see names in latin script, try another map (such as the cycle map on this site) |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47562672 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some (perhaps just misguided) name changes. Attempts to contact the mapper failed. |
|
| 47410408 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.In this changeset and others you've changed some names from mixed language name to a single-language name.Names in OpenStreetMap are usually governed by the "on the ground" rule - see http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInfo... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47562672 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some (perhaps just misguided) name changes. Attempts to contact the mapper failed. |
|
| 46725627 | SomeoneElse | Here you've changed e.g. the name of "Morocco" to not include French. Did you check that that change was acceptable to the OSM community in Morocco before doing so?OSM generally follows an "on the ground rule" with regard to names - see http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d... |
|
| 47379990 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Here you've changed the "name" tag of Morocco from an Arabic/Berber combination (previously it was French/Arabic/Berber) to English.The "name:en" (i.e. the English name) has been "Morocco" all the way through this process.This ch... |
|
| 47344618 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 47344605 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 36274850 | SomeoneElse | Hi Stu,To my knowledge, none of these roads "have numbers" in any meaningful sense. They were already tagged with an "official_ref" (used by and only useful to the council). There are no signs, so C93 through Flaxton isn't anything that you can "refer" to.Best Reg... |
| Stu Mitch | Hi Andy, I wondered about this. Occasionally you see these on signs but yes it is only occasional. They are references by local authorities, so if you had to report to a council it could be useful or if you wanted to query council work. Thanks for the comment though. Regards, Stu |
| SomeoneElse | There is (or used to be) at least one signed "C" road near Helmsley, but they're pretty rare.It would certainly be possible (and not that difficult) to render "official_ref" on a map, but it doesn't make much sense to do so on a general purpose one. As an example, the "pr... |
|
| 47313471 | SomeoneElse | Hello,With this change you added some toilets called "move point" (which seems an odd name) in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. I've deleted it.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 47289343 | SomeoneElse | Hello Rajesultanpur,Are you sure about the bridge location at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/26.74465/82.09145 ? It doesn't seem to match the Bing imagery at that location.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 47287213 | SomeoneElse | Hello Aysel117,Here you've removed some of the language names from http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/232172609/history . Please don't do that. In http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1194 I stressed the sensitivity of names (as I'm sure you well know).If you have evidence that the "na... |
| SomeoneElse | One more thing - applications such as MAPS.ME will use "language name tags". If you think "name:az" is missing from areas where the Azeri language is used and it differs from the "name" then I suggest that you add "name:az" tags.The last time that this was ... |
|
| 47229879 | SomeoneElse | Er - you've just deleted the weather buoy at lat 0, lon 0.Is it definitely no longer there?It has its own web page:http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=13010 |
| srividya_c | Oh never knew this. Will make sure I keep an eye on this node. Thank you for sharing. |
| SomeoneElse | There's actually no recent data from it, but there's actually no recent data from any of the Atlantic stations: http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/obs.shtml so I'm guessing that that's just a glitch. |
|
| 47161438 | SomeoneElse | Hello opengislab,This looks like an import of data from a government agency. I don't remember seeing anything in the past year or so on the imports mailing list about Colombia, or on talk-co about importing Divipola data. How imports should be carried out is described at https://wiki.openstreetm... |
| SomeoneElse | Hola opengislab,Esto parece una importación de datos de una agencia gubernamental. No recuerdo haber visto nada en el último año o así en la lista de correo "imports" sobre Colombia, o en "talk-co" sobre la importación de datos de Divipola. C&... |
|
| 47204321 | SomeoneElse | Hi Maning,Thanks for reverting.No edits by the account that added it since the comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47161448 ; we'll see what happens next. |
|
| 47198522 | SomeoneElse | Hi Shamaun,Thanks for tidying this up.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 47141650 | SomeoneElse | Hello mimakter,Both of the things that you've added in this changeset have been given a name of "house".The "name" tag in OSM is really only for names, not for descriptions. If you want to say that "this is a house" than use a "building" tag of "hous... |
|
| 47141641 | SomeoneElse | Hello select,Thanks for replying to some of the comments at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3042095 . However, all of your changeset comments seem to be just "trace". This isn't helpful to other mappers. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_cha... |
|
| 47076142 | will_p | Hi Stan,Last week I commented on a bridleway you added north of Kegworth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46882223). I received no response from you, and at the weekend I decided to survey it on the ground, because your remote mapping was clearly approximate and rather confusing in the w... |
| Stan W | Hi Will,Apologies for not responding - I am not familiar with the concept of discussions.While I was relying on second-hand information from one of my team of surveyors who walked the route, this does raise an issue in my mind as to the purpose of including routes on OpenStreetMap.If we ... |
| will_p | Hi Stan,There has been a lot of discussion in the past about tagging rights of way and the general consensus is that the highway tag should only be used to indicate physical characteristics and not access rules. There are separate tags available for tagging access (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi Stan, hi Will - for info https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html is on a server in Germany now, and should be able to cope with people viewing maps there (though tile scrapers would be a problem).Best Regards,Andy |
| SK53 | Hi Stan,A couple of blog posts about footpath mapping & assessing completeness of PRoW information are: https://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/10-years-of-footpath-mapping-for.html and https://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/looking-for-footpaths-in-hickling-notts.html might help build the ... |
|
| 47102286 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've accidentally uploaded the "learnosm" test data in the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset :)I'll delete it...Also, it would really help if any changeset comment that you use has meaningful comments in it. Yours only has hashtags in it - there's no description of wh... |
|
| 47078850 | SomeoneElse | The website that you added suggests that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/715633050/history is shut... |
|
| 47099558 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've accidentally uploaded the "learnosm" test data in the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset :)I'll delete it...Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 47058643 | SomeoneElse | Bitte antworten Sie auf die Fragen unter http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4844568 und https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57240 . |
|
| 47010184 | SomeoneElse | Oops, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4744899153/history was uploaded at "latitude 0, longitude 0". I've deleted it.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 46499424 | SomeoneElse | Hello Mihai Turceanu,Can you explain what "wrong hiwghway set" means? Also, it's a bit worrying when a new OpenStreetMap mapper comes along and the only changes they make are deletions. Can you please explain what the problem was?Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | (Traducere automată)Bună ziua Mihai Turceanu,Poți explica ce "hiwghway greșit set" înseamnă? De asemenea, este un pic mai îngrijorătoare atunci când un nou cartograf OpenStreetMap vine de-a lungul și singurele modificări pe care le fac sunt deleții. Puteți s... |
|
| 46813231 | SomeoneElse | Hello,In here you've added an industrial area called "forest". This seems unlikely - can you explain?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 42614390 | SomeoneElse | Hello Sawan Shariar,There seem to be some unconnected nodes in this changeset such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4429529228Can you explain where they came from?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 46922264 | SomeoneElse | Hello Shamaun,Welcome to OpenStreetMap!Unfortunately, almost all of the buildings in this changeset seem to be called "house", which doesn't make a lot of sense.Are you using "geoMapTool" for that? If so, please stop using it immediately - it is broken.Please contact Open... |
|
| 46939228 | SomeoneElse | Hello smafroza,Welcome to OpenStreetMap!Unfortunately, every building in this changeset seems to have named "house" - which doesn't make a lot of sense.Are you using "geoMapTool" for that? If so, please stop using it immediately - it is broken.Please contact OpenStreetMap... |
|
| 46938297 | SomeoneElse | Hello ibrahim2,You have called almost every building in this changeset "house", which really doesn't make a lot of sense.Are you using "geoMapTool" for that? If so, please stop using it immediately - it is broken.Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481088527/history overlaps with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454262870/history , which makes no sense.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 42725792 | SomeoneElse | Hello mimakter,Welcome to OpenStreetMap!Unfortunately, something's gone wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481081840 . It's presumably supposed to be a building, but is a straight line in the middle of another one.Are you using "geoMapTool" for that? If so, please stop u... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46943778 where the changeset comment is: Reverting multiply duplicated data added with buggy GeoMapTool app |
|
| 46923395 | SomeoneElse | Hello Shaplakhatun,Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Unfortunately something has gone a bit wrong here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481006984/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481006761 look like the same building that has been uploaded twice.Also, I'm sure that every building does n... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46943595 where the changeset comment is: Reverting multiply duplicated data added with buggy GeoMapTool app |
|
| 46938613 | SomeoneElse | Hello shahadat19,You're adding the same things over and over again - please stop!Are you using "geoMapTool" for that? If so, please stop using it immediately - it is broken.Please contact OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group in data@osmfoundation.org so that we can explain the problem ... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46943272 where the changeset comment is: Reverting multiply duplicated data added with buggy GeoMapTool app |
|
| 46939671 | SomeoneElse | Hello Sabina ul,Your newly added building http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481098448/history seems to overlap with http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481098448/history . Can you explain what happened?Also, you have called almost every building in this changeset "house", which really doe... |
|
| 46927335 | SomeoneElse | Please stop making these changes without answering the many questions that other mappers have asked you. |
| SomeoneElse | Bitte hört auf, diese Änderungen zu machen, ohne die Major Fragen zu beantworten, die andere Mapper dich gefragt haben. |
|
| 46918832 | SomeoneElse | Hello,What is your source that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286864080/history is no longer proposed but now actually built?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| SomeoneElse | Buna,Care este sursa ta că http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286864080/history nu mai propune, dar acum, de fapt construit?Toate cele bune,Andy Townsend, în numele Grupului de lucru a datelor OSM lui. |
| razor74 | That motorway does not exist. For shure. And must not be changed from this state. You do those changes by ear or what? And why you ignore us all? |
|
| 46920423 | SomeoneElse | Hello again,You appear to be making repeated changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311224899/history . Can you please explain your source for this being a trunk road rather than tertiary or secondary?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| razor74 | Traffic trough Soseaua de centura is only for trucks. Not for normal cars. The general trafic or touristic trafic must go troug Calimanesti. And the quality of the road Soseaua de Centura is very bad. Normal cars must not on that road which is crowded by trucks. So that road must have lover rank, l... |
| razor74 | In romanian language - Nu mai schimba te rog Soseaua de centrua de la Calimanesti in primary road. Acea sosea este doar pentru trafic greu. Pe acolo trebuie sa mearga numai tirurile. Tirurile nu au voie prin Calimanesti, altfel primesc amenda. In plus drumul ala e foarte degradat si nu vrei sa stai ... |
| cristianbogdan | Like in the motorway cases, this is very confusing for drivers and can result in fines. |
|
| 46864149 | SomeoneElse | Looking at http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=46864149 , it would appear that you've made other changes to tags other than just Esperanto. Can you explain here what those changes are?Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | Rigardante http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=46864149, ĝi aperus ke vi faris aliajn ŝanĝojn al etikedoj aliaj ol nur Esperanton. Ĉu vi povas ekspliki ĉi kio tiuj ŝanĝoj?Plej amike,andy |
| Malvolapukulo | Should I respond in Esperanto or in English?1. Mi ŝanĝis nomojn de landoj al tiuj enhavantaj finaĵon -uj- anstataŭ -i-, ĉar -uj- sistemo estas pli logika, mi movis nomojn kun -i- al alt_name:eo. Mi uzis liston de http://bertilow.com/lanlin/europo.html, kun la jenaj esceptoj: Irlando/Ejro, P... |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks, but to be pedantic you did announce the "name:simple" changes in your diary in Esperanto! When it comes to making announcements that's right up there with 'in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leop... |
|
| 46855721 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| AHMED ATAHRAN | Hello,Sorry, I did not pay attention to this, it was my first use of OSM,Next time, if i need, i will use test server.Thank you.Ahmed |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks - if you've got any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 46808206 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 46865190 | SomeoneElse | Bitte antworten Sie auf die Fragen unter http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4844568 |
| Eberth | This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 47045657. Please read https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57240 and get in touch with the community! |
|
| 46842101 | SomeoneElse | Oops - somehow in this change you managed to add something at latitude 0, longitude 0 - any idea how that might have happened? |
|
| 46833897 | SomeoneElse | Hi Brian,Could you please address the questions raised on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46819034 before continuing to import this data?Best Regards,Andy |
| brianboru | Being addressed as requested. Import paused |
|
| 46814368 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Was it your intention to remove the ISO3166-1 for Spain here?Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | Hola,¿Fue su intención retirar la ISO3166-1 para España aquí?Atentamente,Andy |
| JaviAyuntaIrun | Hola Andy !! No ha sido un fallo. It was a mistake. sorry ;-) |
|
| 46819034 | chillly | This is an import, right? Where's the unique userid? Where's the wiki import page? Where's the Imports mailing list discussion? |
| SomeoneElse | Hi Brian,It looks like things may have got a bit ahead of themselves here. The only list discussion that I can see for this is at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-westmidlands/2017-March/002127.html , and that's not really a discussion as much as you saying "I'd like to imp... |
| pigsonthewing | Other issues are already being discussed elsewhere, but "Betula sp" (strictly, with italicised "Betula" and period in "sp.") is the correct taxonomic designation for a specimen of the genus Betula, whose exact species is not known.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speci... |
| SK53 | @pigsonthewing: there is also a widely used genus tag, which is particularly appropriate for trees not identified to species (and generally useful because of the vagaries of the taxonomy of various street trees). |
|
| 46825444 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!What are you actually trying to do here?You might find something like http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ more appropriate for whatever it is.Best Regards,Andy |
| chillly | This follows a pattern. Whoever is coordinating this would be best to talk to someone in OSM (by adding a comment here or sending a direct message to me). These edits are likely to be deleted, they are not useful in OSM, so this work will be lost. |
|
| 46825021 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThis is the second edit this evening adding a very strange plateau in this locality. Is this part of a course or a some other related group?This really does not look valid for the area. I think both edits are likely to be removed. |
| SomeoneElse | Unlike the other one, there probably is a bit of moraine under here (it's a raised bit west of the Rother and the clue's in the nae "Stonegravels") but ir's doesn't really belong in OSM as it stands.What are you actually trying to do?You might find something like http://umap.openstreet... |
|
| 46824124 | chillly | Welcome to OSMWhat is this edit all about? Did you realise that you were saving to the live database? You seem to have a very odd group of tags and names for an urban part of UK.Do you need some help with this edit? I can remove it for you if that is what is needed. |
| SomeoneElse | It's not much of a plateau certainly - St Augustine's Road is very much a hill with the river at the eastern end of it, and the road that drops down to Queen's Park is likewise.What exactly is it supposed to be? |
|
| 46780026 | SomeoneElse | Hi,Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4407506448/history still a bike shop? It's marked as shop=bicycle (although the name has been removed).Best Regards,Andy |
| Baldric | Definitely not a bike shop anymore but still a retail unit. CheersPaul |
|
| 46762821 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I'm not sure how it happened, but you've added some things in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.Please don't do this, even as a test - OpenStreetMap is a map of things that really exist in the world, not test data.Hope you don't mind me mentioning this, just t... |
|
| 46795156 | SomeoneElse | Relation 7066589 has 37,948 nodes as members. It's just broken an osm2pgsql import here, and I suspect I wont be the only one.What is it actually supposed to be? |
| woodpeck | I have also noticed that this import seems to have first been raised on talk-br on March 9, two days before the import was started. Problems like a collection relation with 37k members would have been found before the import if people had actually had time to look at what was proposed. |
| woodpeck | The survey points seem to contain this message: "Não alterar: coordenadas originais do IBGE". I wonder why they are imported in OSM at all; what use is data that you cannot alter in OSM? Anyone interested in doing anything with the survey points can just use the shape file. |
| pnorman | Hello,Imports in OSM are subject to some requirements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines), one of which the community is consulted prior to the import, including the imports@ mailing list.Because this import is causing technical problems and has not been discussed, I'm go... |
| smaprs | Ok, if you think its' better to revert it. We discussed it in Brazilian community thinking these survey points have precise coordinates and can help align imagery in remote regions of Brazil. I'll read carefully your remarks and see what can be done better. |
| woodpeck | I have looked that the Bing imagery surrounding some of the points and found nothing visible on the ground that I could have used to align the image though. I think the matter deserves a more thorough discussion. We'll revert it for now but that doesn't mean it can never come back. |
| smaprs | Ok. Sorry for the unexpected problems. |
|
| 42674223 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this area again? Looks like several of the islands got flooded:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445857480#map=14/24.5132/89.7487The reason seems to be this relation, where the roles of the members do not match:http://osm.org/relation/6628885Cheers, Jan |
| SomeoneElse | Also,Tagging http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445462657 as a "village green" is surely wrong.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 46201620 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| dehr | Dear Andy (DWG),Thank-you for your message. Yes, I work for Facebook and my name is David. Per your requests on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:AI-Based_Country_Scale_Road_Import and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57387 we have stopped making any edits. Please ... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi David.Thanks for the clarification.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 45986910 | pitscheplatsch | Hi dehr. May I know the reason behind deleting many mapped highways in this changeset? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45986910 |
| SomeoneElse | Hi Pascal,This changeset is I think related to https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=632747#p632747 . Essentially Facebook created some "clever" workflow to add roads (like they did last year that resulted in every wadi and wall in Egypt bing added as a "road" befo... |
| stephankn | @Andi: It's quite difficult to properly use changeset discussions as long as there is no way to find your own comments. There is code fragments to add this to the wiki page but no one works on it. Thailand has a forum where more people participate in discussions. |
| dehr | Hi Pascal, Andi, and Stephan.Sorry for the late response on this changeset as this is my personal account and does not see much usage. I work for Facebook and my name is David. We were working in the dev environment and an editor accidentally uploaded their practice edits to live OSM inste... |
| SomeoneElse | @stephankn - it is possible to find your own comments (thanks to Pascal!):http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=61891&commentedCheers,Andy |
|
| 46714069 | GinaroZ | Hi, welcome to OSM. Just wondering why you have changed these from gardens to parks? |
| Elfangorax | These two locations -- particularly Gardner's Crescent -- could equally be considered gardens and parks. I changed them to parks because I believe Pokémon Go uses named parks to assign nests in the game. I'm not sure whether it's possible to classify them as both, but would be happy to do so ... |
| GinaroZ | They can only be tagged as one or the other. Parks are usually larger, and "Exchange Park" was tagged as a private garden - so hardly a park!Finally, you should not be changing OSM data just so it creates nests in Pokemon Go. |
| SomeoneElse | I was there only the other week, and what is now called "Exchange Park" didn't look anything like a park to me :( |
| GinaroZ | I've reverted these back to gardens |
|
| 46666195 | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46677521 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (ficitional additions at (0,0)). All other edits of the changeset are not worth enough to be kept. |
| SomeoneElse | @Nakaner - Just in case you're not aware, "Cat Forest", "Happy Park" etc. are part of the learnosm test data. See https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm/issues/335 for the full story. |
| Nakaner | Hi SomeoneElse,thank you for the hint. I found it because Martijn van Exel tweeted a screen shot and I could not – as you might expect – wait and reverted immediately.Best regardsMichael |
| althio | Hi Luke Langholf,Thank you for trying out OpenStreetMap with JOSM and LearnOSM.Most of all sorry about the complications with your very first edit. Unfortunately a glitch introduced bogus data from the sample file, so your contribution was promptly deleted. Now some of your modifications sho... |
|
| 46685591 | SomeoneElse | Hehe - and congratulations for allowing for the offset!https://news.virginia.edu/content/researchers-explain-why-greenwich-prime-meridian-moved |
|
| 46297946 | mueschel | Hi,this changeset generated a lot of objects with a huge number of tags that are not documented and seem to have been added by mistake during this import.Jan |
| Bgabor | Hi, All 4000 points a certain water sources in the area and all attached attribute is important. |
| mueschel | If this information is important, I suggest to use common tags that can be parsed by existing software. Btw, I don't see a connection to hotosm project 2525 you mention in the changeset comment. Has this import of data been discussed on the appropriate mailing list? Is this data really 'open'? The... |
| edvac | Hi:If this is an import and haven't been discussed, it should be reverted inmediatly.Imports have to be discussed with the local community and with the imports list, and should be documented and the source compatible with the ODbL. |
| muralito | No doubt it is an import. It should be reverted, or at least discussed, fixed and the resulting new tags documented. |
| edvac | This import has been reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46535966Please, read and follow the imports guidelines (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) before doing any import. Imports have to be documented, been given ODbL compatible permission by the copyright owners... |
| SomeoneElse | Hello Bgabor,Just to echo what has been said above - if you want to import data please do read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and follow the links from it.If you've got any questions you can either mail the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org or ask on the "imports"... |
| Bgabor | Hi,I will send a letter for the National Bureau of Statistics to Tanzania, and ask them to clarify the licenses for all data from http://opendata.go.tz/ website.PS: thank you for your efforts...Gabor |
| muralito | Hello Bgabor:If the terms & conditions are the same as stated in http://opendata.go.tz/en/pages/kanuni-na-masharti , I'm not sure if the d) paragraph is compatible with ODbL. Maybe in this case we need explicit permission from the owner to import their data into OSM. |
| SomeoneElse | @Bgabor,I'd suggest having this discussion on the "imports" list - there people will be able to advise you about licenses.See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-February/004819.html for where this import was first mentioned there.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 45987021 | pitscheplatsch | Hi dehr. May I know the reason behind deleting many mapped highways in this changeset? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45987021 |
| SomeoneElse | See my comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45986910 - part of the same process I think. |
| dehr | Hi Pascal and Andi.Sorry for the late response on this changeset as this is my personal account and does not see much usage. I work for Facebook and my name is David. We were working in the dev environment and an editor accidentally uploaded their practice edits to live OSM instead of the de... |
|
| 46481155 | SomeoneElse | Hello Oak_Park_IL,Somethings gone a bit wrong here. It looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477786620 was imported and you did't check for existing data such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327700188 (those two buildings overlap).As I said on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset... |
|
| 46663387 | SomeoneElse | Hi,Any idea what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479158273 is here? It doesn't have any tags on it.Best Regards,Andy |
| Bgabor | Hi, Yes, the task wasn't finished yet. Now it has tag on it... |
|
| 40258715 | Harald Hartmann | Hi carlitos gomez, this changeset looks like an import (14782x man_made=water_well). Where was this import discussed and documented? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines)The problem i see is the possible incorrect tagging: you used name instead of ref, and tagged both amenity=wat... |
| edvac | This import has been reported to the imports list. It will likely be reverted, or redacted in case there is a copyright infringement. |
| edvac | This changeset has been reverted, in two changesets:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46536080https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46536388Please, follow the imports guidelines (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) for any import. |
| carlitos gomez | Hi HaraldSurely this is an error on my part. I didn't realize because the pointswere well displayed on OSMThis data have been shared by CDIG (Centre de Documentation etd'Information Geographique du Tchad) in early 2016.In theory these public data and shareable on OSM (I'm in the process... |
| carlitos gomez | Hi EdvacSorry for my late reply, I was on field missionThis data have been shared by CDIG (Centre de Documentation et d'Information Géographique du Tchad) in early 2016. In theory these data is public (I'm in the process of requesting confirmation from my contacts in Chad) |
| Harald Hartmann | The problem is, that public data isn't public data. In Germany we have also public OpenData, but: The "attribution" obliges the data user to name the respective data provider. This doesn't match the OpenStreetMap License Policy, and therefore this (OpenData) isn't useable in OpenStreetMap ... |
| Marion Barry | But if he gets confirmation from the data provider then it will be fine, correct? |
| Harald Hartmann | If he pays attention to the import guidelines,and documents it in the wiki (for transparacy, legal and license issues),and corrects the import,and so on, yes, then everything will be fine. |
| Harald Hartmann | sorry, i've forgotten the link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Step_3_-_License_approval |
| edvac | Imports have to be discussed with the local OSM community too, and then with the imports list.I would also discourage automatic imports. Better do it manually, crowdsourced, adding contextual data to each object (having a WASH point in the middle of nowhere, without the road access to it, is a rea... |
| carlitos gomez | Hi allAll data from the ResEau project (SIRE) under the DDC-Tchad-UNOSAT contractare public and shareable data, confirmed ! |
| carlitos gomez | Hi edvacAdd data manually: ok for digitization some infrastructures but I do not think that is a good idea if there are 500, 1000 or 2000 points to add.Freaky, some members of the OSM community met for me (mostly humanitarian staff) just encourages the opposite."having a WASH point in th... |
| SomeoneElse | Hello carlitos gomez,Just to echo what has been said above - if you want to import data please do read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and follow the links from it.If you've got any questions you can either mail the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org or ask on the "impo... |
|
| 46589890 | SomeoneElse | Hello Mihai Mandea,Could you explain a little bit what "Thanks for Watching" means? Changeset comments are supposed to explain the changes that you made to other mappers, but I can't really understand what "Thanks for Watching" means. Hope you don't mind me asking,Best Reg... |
| SomeoneElse | (Traducere automată)Bună ziua, Michael Mandea,Ați putea explica un pic ce "Multumesc pentru echipa" Mijloace? Changeset comentarii ar trebui sa explice modificările aduse altor cartografi asta, dar eu nu pot să înțeleg cu adevărat ce "Mulțumesc pentru echipa" Mi... |
|
| 46621971 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data |
|
| 46540499 | SomeoneElse | Thanks - surprised I missed the SubWay here! |
|
| 46648922 | SomeoneElse | wideth=3 (which the previous mapper set) might be in feet rather than meters I think - probably still needs a proper survey for access. |
|
| 45776985 | SomeoneElse | Er - Pokemon Acres, really?That just looks like someone's house to me ...Best Regards, Andy |
| muzirian | Looks like people are wrongly marking places so that they could have biomes and thus required pokemon at their home. |
| muzirian | changeset 45750994 and one more edit in that are looks suspicious |
| SomeoneElse | @muzirian Thanks - I've reverted it. |
|
| 46564594 | SomeoneElse | This reverts some further edits which depended on Google-derived data reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46564425 . |
|
| 46452919 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've changed the northern bit of Maun Valley Park https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302973671/history from being a nature reserve into being a duplicate park. It's already a park because it''s part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4031972 - you can tell that by looking at the htt... |
|
| 46500034 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I think something has gone a bit wrong here - you've deleted some things that form part of boundary relations, so some (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4761171 ) now have gaps in them.I'll change this back, since presumably this wasn't what you w... |
|
| 46484184 | SomeoneElse | Hello Oak_Park_IL,It looks like you're adding a series of nodes here, and it looks like the overlap with existing buildings.What are you actually trying to do?If you're trying to import some data, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik... |
|
| 46418787 | SomeoneElse | Hello, The names on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477299558/history seem unlikely. If it's called "Waldecker Bank" and it's in Germany I'd be surprised if it has an English names of "Bank (ATM)" or a French name of "banque".Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 46417790 | SomeoneElse | Hello,It looks like you may be performing some sort of import. Please review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and the links from there including https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines . It's important to discuss imports before they take place to prevent problems such as ... |
|
| 45207584 | Chetan_Gowda | In this changeset also, you've deleted a existing road. It can be clearly seen from the BING imagery. |
| SomeoneElse | @Chetan_Gowda does this need restoring? |
| Chetan_Gowda | Hi SomeoneElse, yes! Need restoring |
| izmickobe | Sorry, if I happen to do something wrong.Can you please restore it if possible?Because I don't remember what I did. |
|
| 46391955 | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 43476437, 43477049, 44946646. |
| SomeoneElse | Edits that depended on this data were reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46392158 . http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46392950 and the next two changesets are patching up some gaps in NY9A (actually present before these changes) and I've asked someone who edited the M12 bus rou... |
|
| 46392158 | SomeoneElse | This is tidying up some data that depending on Google-derived data reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46391955 . |
|
| 26162197 | SomeoneElse | Hi,I wonder if you could help - the M12 bus route http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4117524 currently has a gap down at the south end http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4117524#map=17/40.73818/-74.00350 .I'm guessing that you're familiar to the area - could you fill in any gap?Would it ... |
|
| 46149028 | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you may be aware there were a number of issues with this changeset. Following problems noted at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=633701#p633701 it was reverted by what is presumably another Facebook account.What software did you actually use to make these edits? The c... |
| VLD001 | Dear Andy (DWG),Thanks for the clarification. Yes we are aware of the issue and have fixed the bug and edits as we mentioned in this post https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57387.We are using both JOSM and an internal iD editor based on V1.8.5 for validation. As described in ou... |
|
| 46116680 | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you may be aware there were a number of issues with this changeset. Following problems noted at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=633701#p633701 it was reverted by what is presumably another Facebook account.What software did you actually use to make these edits? The c... |
|
| 46117371 | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you may be aware there were a number of issues with this changeset. Following problems noted at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=633701#p633701 it was reverted by what is presumably another Facebook account.What software did you actually use to make these edits? The c... |
|
| 46112721 | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you may be aware there were a number of issues with this changeset. Following problems noted at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=633701#p633701 it was reverted by what is presumably another Facebook account.What software did you actually use to make these edits? The c... |
|
| 46144791 | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you may be aware there were a number of issues with this changeset. Following problems noted at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=633701#p633701 it was reverted by what is presumably another Facebook account.What software did you actually use to make these edits? The c... |
|
| 44482889 | SomeoneElse | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4559402489 is a caravan site in a building. This seems unlikely. Can you explain?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 46081403 | SomeoneElse | Is the WMCA really "admin level 6"? I thought that it just an attempt to obtain some "City Region" government money, and didn't have any of the administrative powers (beyond running the buses) that e.g. Birmingham City Council did? |
| brianboru | I did muse over this one. There is an elected mayor and powers over economic regeneration. From WMCA's website:Combined authorities are legal bodies with powers of decision making granted by parliament. They are a new way for local authorities to work together on key strategic functions that cro... |
|
| 45982079 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 45987173 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46151358 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46150953 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46182213 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46151109 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46145312 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46122388 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46152538 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46151291 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46152253 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46181723 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46144939 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46144803 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
| VLD001 | Dear Andy (DWG),Thank you for your message. Yes, I work for Facebook. My name is . Per your requests on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:AI-Based_Country_Scale_Road_Import and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57387 we have stopped making any edits. My profile has ... |
| VLD001 | Dear Andy (DWG),Thank you for your message. Yes, I work for Facebook. My name is Jaclyn.Per your requests on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:AI-Based_Country_Scale_Road_Import and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57387 we have stopped making any edits.My profile has b... |
| stephankn | a highway=track indicates a way used for agricultural purposes. How do you distinguish these from simply unpaved roads? Do you consider it itelligent to place roads in the middle of nowhere without proper connection to the highway network? Please stop doing such low-quality edits! |
| VLD001 | Stephan,Thank you for your feedback. We based our tagging on a few things;1. The commonly used tags in this area are highway=track. For Example https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?edit … 68/99.49212. This area looks like an agricultural area based on our recent high-resolution satellite... |
|
| 46361667 | SomeoneElse | Hello,It would really help other mappers if you could use meaningful changeset comments, not just "#".Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 46349993 | SomeoneElse | Hello,What is "#yourinstancename-project-2571"? It would really help other mappers if you could use meaningful changeset comments, not just hashtags.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 46343701 | SomeoneElse | Hallo,Wat is "#yourinstancename-project-2572"? Het zou echt helpen andere kaartenmakers als je gewend zinvolle changeset reacties, niet alleen hashtags.mvg,Andy |
|
| 46145001 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46201621 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you please explain who you are and who you are working for? Your changeset comments (such as they are) suggest that you may be performing an undiscussed import on behalf of Facebook. Can you please ensure that you do not perform any more imports until they have been properly discussed,... |
|
| 46250293 | SomeoneElse | These do look just like doodles, don't they? For info, I've commented over on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Extremmapping about it.Has everything by this user already been checked and if necessary reverted? If not let me know and I'll have a look at what's left (and revert if necessar... |
|
| 43728113 | SomeoneElse | Hello Afeef Chaudhary,Can you explain what you were trying to do here? The "building" that you added just seems to be a big triangle and doesn't seem to match anything on the ground.OpenStreetMap is a map of the world as it exists, not a map of doodles that someone drew because they w... |
|
| 46324788 | SomeoneElse | Hello Eng Visal,You've again added two "viewpoints" to OSM, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4700389689 looks very much like a personal bookmark.When you edit OpenStreetMap you're editing a map that everyone can see, not just your personal copy. Please do continue editing, but ... |
| SomeoneElse | ជំរាបសួរអេងវិសាលអ្នកបានបន្ថែមម្តងទៀត "ទស្សនៈ" ពីរទៅ OSM ទេប៉ុន្តែ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4700389689 មើលទៅខ្លាំងណាស់ដូចជាក... |
|
| 46304759 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Edits that you make update the one shared map that everyone sees. That's why it's important that only valid edits are made to the map. If you want to experiment with the editors, you can do so over at http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org (an exact copy of the main s... |
|
| 37672129 | SomeoneElse | Hi Will,A question about the Y1 bus:Is the Langley Mill / Eastwood stretch of this https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4578631#map=14/53.0159/-1.3311 the same as the Derby / Heanor service? I've only ever used the latter part. the H1 (which this is a partial duplicate of - Yourbus have desi... |
| will_p | Hi Andy,When I added the Y1 route information I certainly assumed the Langley Mill / Eastwood stretch was part of the same route as the Derby / Heanor section. It was surveyed by photographing the bus stops rather than using the bus.I mostly added the Eastwood part of the route in 2015 and H... |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks Will,I'll stick the Derby-Heanor bit into the same relation for now and update it if anything seems different.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 36042542 | SomeoneElse | Hello CyclingClaire,I noticed that the whole of a section of the River Worfe http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31176973 had had "ford=yes" added to it. I guess this happened by accident, and I've removed it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46212083 . Everything else is unchange... |
|
| 45974439 | streckenkundler | Hi,the species Humulus lupulus L. is not a tree or shrub. You're making a big mistake here. Fields with hop are only simple perennial farmlands. You must stop your action. The DWG ist informed.See also the germany-Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57322Sven |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46178656 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some partially Google-sourced edits |
| LLAQWA | hi, i think hop its not a tree too - its a plant. for me hop its a permanent cultivation - not a annual cultivation like mais or rice.because of this y made the changes. |
| SomeoneElse | @LLAQWA If you think that there is a category error in the way that things are tagged please do follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct and discuss your changes first - that way we'll avoid wasting everyone's time (yours as well as everyone else's).Best Regards,\... |
|
| 46202925 | SomeoneElse | Changeset comment here should have been "Reverting some more things in erroneous revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46189471 - see there for more details." |
|
| 46191505 | SomeoneElse | Just checking - does the ISO code that you've added here apply to:o The territory held by the Polisario Fronto The former state of Western SaharaAs you may be aware, there is more than one claim over the latter.Best Regards,Andy |
| giggls | We just tried to fix tagging to make nominatim work everywhere. We know, that the current ISO codes (for former state of Western Sahara) are not 100% correct but they are as good as they can get. |
| SomeoneElse | If this ISO code doesn't belong to this area, please don't add it. The original area of Western Sahara is in OSM as http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2559126 .I have no idea what you mean by "fix tagging to make nominatim work everywhere". Can you explain? |
| giggls | We just changed the behaviour in nominatim to incorporate boundary=disputed. This way we will not need these (arguably) wrong tags here anymore. Feel free to revert my changeset. |
|
| 46178656 | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 45914144, 45914294, 45914333, 45914358, 45914500, 45914565, 45914981, 45915104, 45915253, 45915299, 45915473, 45915577, 45915797, 45915920, 45916255, 45916443, 45917867, 45918292, 45944402, 45944711, 45944898, 45945626, 45945773, 45945911, ... |
| SomeoneElse | The changeset comment above is incorrect - this is unrelated to Google. It is instead a revert of a number of plant-based mechanical edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45974439 and other changesets by author of that for details of the problems with the edits that led to them bein... |
|
| 46161968 | SomeoneElse | I've left the duplicate areas (part of two schools) which might be correct and the duplicate nodes (to indicate where there is still a problem). |
| SomeoneElse | Note that some of the "odd duplications" seem to match imagery features, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449580309 , which looks like some sort of shed. The surrounding landuse could also do to be aligned with the school boundary too. |
|
| 46134827 | wille | Hello John Grubb,Thanks for your contributions! However we are not allowed to insert data in OSM from Google Earth/Maps/StreetView. The google license doesn't allow it, please use only the mapbox and bing imagery and your local knowledge.best regards,wille |
| John Grubb | Cheers, chap...For clarification; data isn't extracted from GE or StreetView; I just use them as a pictorial reference along with my dashcam footage and GPS fixes. I'm not actually aware of what data there is to extract from GE or SV - it's just photos, after all! Unfortunately, the source field... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi John,Unfortunately you can't use Google Earth or StreetView even just "as a pictorial reference".Best Regards,Andy Townsend, OSM Data Working Group. |
| John Grubb | Blimey! So, for example: browse through StreetView, see a business name has changed since it was mapped, close the browser entirely, at a later time open JOSM, change the name associated with the building and it's a © violation? Who knew...?! Apart from the obvious, who could tell either...?\... |
| pnorman | Just don't use Google at all, be it for "a pictorial reference", a "reminder" or anything else related to OSM mapping. It doesn't give you anything you're allowed to use.Unfortunately, I'm going to have to identify what changesets used Google and undo them.Paul NormanFo... |
| John Grubb | That's a bind. Oh, well - c'est la vie, I s'pose.It does raise an interesting question, though - when can something seen be unseen. To get away from the GE issue to avoid blurring: I'm an avid hiker and go off with my map and compass into the wilds to bash some hills regularly. If I were to, say... |
| SK53 | Straightforward actually: if in doubt don't do it. For hill elevations there are old out-of-copyright OS maps (and possibly some OS Open Data) or elevation from a GPS with a barometer etc. For business names there may be open data such as Food Hygiene, Companies House etc. The actual problem is ... |
|
| 46065488 | SomeoneElse | Hello,I've changed the school building back to a school. Please don't change things in OSM to things that they aren't!Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 45836919 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Andy from the DWG here. I'm just trying to understand some changes in this area, and noticed that here you've removed the wikipedia / wikidata link for this village and also the "name:az". Was there a reason for that?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working... |
|
| 45652310 | chippy | You just deleted Node 1 |
| chippy | again |
| chippy | Sorry, I mean, it had been deleted and restored previously :) |
| malcolmh | You had created a duplicate of node 3815077900, which has been there since 2015. |
| SomeoneElse | @chippy I don't think malcolmh created the duplicate - that was someone else trying to move an "important" node "somewhere important". "node 1" has been on a few continents so far - I'm sure it'll get resurrected somewhere else at some point. As for the NOAA buoy here... |
| chippy | The history of node 1 indicates that it is frequently deleted and restored.SomeoneElse: I did not say that malcolmh created the duplicate node. But malcolmh did delete Node 1 (as the only change) in this changeset which is the subject of this changeset discussion. I also don't think malcolmh... |
| malcolmh | I was replying to chippy! @chippy when you "restored" node 1, node 3815077900 was already in the database & had been since 2015. Therefore you had created a duplicate & that is why I deleted it. |
| SomeoneElse | I'm just confused because it wasn't chippy that restored node 1! |
| malcolmh | Sequence of events:24/5/15: node 1 restored as a tree in DE3/11/15: node 3815077900 created at 0,01/12/16: node 1 deleted30/1/17: node 1 restored, this time at 0,0 - on top of node 3815077900. Later that day, I deleted it.The mapper that has created this confusion is "glglgl", ... |
| malcolmh | Also, apologies to chippy, who I now realise was not the mapper who created the duplicate, only the mapper who raised the issue. |
| EzekielT | Node 1 used to be a tree in Passau.. |
|
| 45983598 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Whilst it's great to see new mappers, it makes people slightly nervous to see someone updating 977 roads with "lit=yes" or "lit=no". That's an awful lot of surveying to have saved up from somewhere; unless of course the source was other than ... |
| SomeoneElse | Actually, from driving past tonight, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148833971/history isn't directly lit (though the lights on the roundabout above make it appear so). It would still be useful to know the source of these 977 though. |
| TR42 | Source is general local knowledge from several years of living in the area. Backed up by close ariel imagery. I'm confident all info is accurate. |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks. |
|
| 45990009 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!You've deleted a buoy in the Atlantic Ocean here by mistake (it's since been restored).However, can you explain what "#hotosm-project-2489 #MissingMaps #EliminateMalaria #VisualizeNoMalaria #Zambia#task.hot Uganda #Mugabi Henry", which you've used as ... |
|
| 46001770 | SomeoneElse | This is a follow-up to http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45996374 . It reverts the remaining edits made in changeset 41640199, not reverted by the previous attempts. |
|
| 45628300 | ndm | This changeset looks strange and the pokemon comment suspicious - can someone local check? |
| pitscheplatsch | In particular this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449579231For more details see: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45628300 |
| SomeoneElse | I've restored things back to something approaching normality (specifically the sports pitches and footways were OK, and I've reverted the school to the edubase geometry and added buildings).It was actually not this changeset, but another one by a different mapper, that "lost" the school ... |
|
| 45217427 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!You've changed http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302804996/history from a footway to a cycleway here, which seems odd. Last time I was there it definitely looked like a cycleway!Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 45543349 | Supaplex | So big changeset. What are these ways? |
| SomeoneElse | I've reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45996692 and sent them a message that they have to read before continuing mapping in http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1192 . |
|
| 45531008 | SomeoneElse | Hello - you're adding problem data again. Can you explain exactly what http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469218925 is supposed to be please? |
| Srihari Thalla | Please revert this changeset. Ways 46...22 and ...25 doesn't exist and Way ...23 is just duplicate/bad data. |
| SomeoneElse | Sorry for the delay - I was hoping that "Geothings Inc" would reply since they have replied to private emails in the past (which I sent here as well). I've reverted this in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45996711 . |
| Srihari Thalla | No problem, thanks! |
|
| 44414272 | SomeoneElse | How on earth can you think that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459718300 is still an active amenity=parking? It's around what is probably _the_ most iconic building in the area https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1402678 . The Bing imagery presumably dates to it's most rec... |
|
| 45986564 | SomeoneElse | Oops - this was just a 1-node building. |
|
| 23217080 | SomeoneElse | Hi Kev,Just wondered if you thought whether this road (the old A46) was still labelled the B687? My recollection is that there's no signage here (but that's based on driving up here only once, and could be wrong). OS OpenData and OS Locator suggests B692 (which I've not seen signed either).I'm... |
| kevjs1982 | Good question to which I don't know the answer off the top of my head (normally I'm on the A46 or NCN15/48). Will try and remember to look out next time I'm down that way (once the weather is less wintry).Rushcliffe Council do suggest it's the latter however "Rushcliffe Green Belt Review &... |
|
| 45875464 | chillly | Where was this mass edit discussed?Undiscussed mass edits must be reverted. |
| parukhin | Hi, chillly.No, these edits were not discussed.Where can i find definition for "mass edit"? |
| chillly | http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct |
| parukhin | No, these edits not Automated edits.Why do you think I use bots or scripts?I manully edit opening_hours tags or use JOSM quality checks to fix typo, weekdays name in local languages etc. and review my edits before uploading.See for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463305182/history |
| SomeoneElse | Unfortunately some information has been lost, for example from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465154598/history - that used to say "Opening times dependent on custom" but now someone looking at the shop would think it had fixed opening and closing times. |
| parukhin | Add to description https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465154598 |
|
| 45084589 | BCNorwich | Hello there Sam888.Quite a few problems with the features you recently added. Would you like to have a look and maybe make adjustments, please see here :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-0.94274&lat=53.24077&zoom=13&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersecti... |
| BCNorwich | Two areas tagged as grass that are actually 90, 95% not grass but highway surface, are removed. Grass area was a narrow verge. Each area was also mapped with self intersection.One area remapped to remove self intersection of area outline, create areas without any self intersection, now mapped pr... |
| SomeoneElse | Based on the last time I was in the area (last year) I don't think there's anything like this amount of "meadow" here. You could maybe make a claim for the bit by the cricket pitch, but it'd be a stretch. |
| SomeoneElse | This was so wrong based on my recollection of the area that I've reverted it (but also tried to incorporate future changes that seemed plausible, e.g. that the main street in Milton is lit). |
|
| 37013135 | SomeoneElse | The node that you added as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3989393999 was already mapped (and spelt correctly) as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242753178 . |
|
| 45812529 | SomeoneElse | You've changed http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4967734/history from highway=unclassified to highway=minor. What sort of road is that supposed to be? |
|
| 45839570 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've changed http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343529096/history from being not lit to being lit. Are you sure about this, and are you sure that the bit the the east is still not lit?Things might have changed since I was last there of course, it was a couple of years ago. When did you... |
|
| 45869506 | LeTopographeFou | See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23004_-_TyposThinking afterwards, this edit may have been too agressive... I hope it will not be perceived this way. |
| SomeoneElse | I wouldn't say "aggressive", but I would say "irrelevant" - anything that parses mph speed limits is going to parse "30mph".Also, this change is making the tidying up of some earlier problem edits much, much harder. |
| LeTopographeFou | Yes I agree with your second sentence to better answer your first point: "30 mph" is different from "30mph" exactly because parsing (and regular expressions) can't save everyone, everywhere and everytime. This is why this is relevant at the end. Having a consistent data set helps... |
| SK53 | The idea that by editing tags to some kind of common format will somehow make it easier for data consumers is a pernicious fallacy. Any use of a speed limit with or without "mph" in the tag will require some form of parsing, error detection and data wrangling. For instance the 11th com... |
|
| 45941061 | SomeoneElse | Hi Bernard,Did you even look at the underlying features that you made changes to here?The way that you have edited https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151615229/history started out as a wood (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/lNO ) and was changed to a duplicate park by a Pokemon mapper in https:... |
| BCNorwich | I have reverted the changeset. My apologies for not having any idea what you were doing. |
|
| 45743391 | SomeoneElse | Hi lewismv2002,Please don't add imaginery things like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471442533 to OpenStreetMap. I'll remove that - please don't add more things like it.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group. |
|
| 44244894 | SomeoneElse | Hello, You've merged together various "estate_agents", "estate_agency" etc. in here. I can see the logic in this, except that you've ignored the main tag of "shop" or "office" and made them all "office". I've certainly used both "shop" ... |
| LeTopographeFou | Hi SomeoneElse,Yes I see your point and I've followed a little bit the comments about shop vs office for this kind of business. What do you propose? I'm afraid that I will not be able to make the difference between those two as I'm not from England and can't check by myself. |
| SomeoneElse | > What do you propose?I'd change the ones that were shop previously (like http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351521115/history ) back to shop, and if any of them had other tags that were changed into "office" at the same time, I'd change those back too. |
| LeTopographeFou | Done, all previously tagged shops have been redefined as shop. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45980978 |
|
| 43927610 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "#hotosm-project-2286, #MissingMaps, Mwezeni, #Zimbabwe Added #roads and #settlements using Bing #googledub" means please? As you may be well aware we're not allowed to use Google as a source for OpenStreetMap (although specific post-disaster exceptions have so... |
| dónal | Hi Andy!#googledub refers to the group of volunteers in Dublin, Ireland that engage with HOT / MSF to support their efforts to map vulnerable areas of the world. Volunteers rely on the imagery provided to HOT for their mapping efforts (not google maps).Feel free to message me directly if you... |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks for that! |
|
| 45813992 | smaprs | Olá Rodrigo, conforme regra do OSM importações em massa devem ser conversadas primeiramente com a comunidade OSM -BR e proposta documentada na wiki. Por favor contate -nos. |
| SomeoneElse | Hello sazrodrigo,This changeset appears to be a import of building information from an external source. Please be aware that all imports must follow the procedure documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines - it's important that all the stages there are followed. Before... |
| SomeoneElse | (Tradução automática)Olá sazrodrigo,Este changeset parece ser uma importação de informações de construção de uma fonte externa. Lembre-se de que todas as importações devem seguir o procedimento documentado em... |
|
| 45650784 | SomeoneElse | Hello jseigneuret,This changeset has been raised with OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group because it looks like a mechanical edit.As described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct "The Automated Edits code of conduct must be followed at all times when perfor... |
| SomeoneElse | Bonjour jseigneuret,Cette modification a été soulevée avec OpenStreetMap Data Working Group parce qu'il ressemble à une modification mécanique.Comme décrit sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Code_de_conduite_des_modifications_automatis%C3%A9es &q... |
| jseigneuret | Bonjour, cet édit a été fait avec une requête Overpass API et surement pas avec un BOT. Cet modification répond au condition d'intégration OSMOSE et n'est en rien une tache non réfléchi. J'ai fait deux requêtes pour mettre à jour le... |
| SomeoneElse | Donc vous n'avez pas discuté avec personne du tout? Https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Code_de_conduite_des_modifications_automatis%C3%A9es#Discuter_de_vos_plans dit: "Si vous planifiez de faire une édition automatisée, annoncez l'avant et parlez sur la liste de diffusi... |
| jseigneuret | Bonjour, cette discution sur la manière de tagué a été abordé en 2013. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2013-August/014582.html La page de traffic_signals a été mise à jour en 2016 et l'intégration à Osmose comme ... |
| SomeoneElse | Bonjour,> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2013-August/014582.htmlCe fil n'était pas de changer "direction=backward" vers "traffic_signals:direction=backward", et est venu à aucune conclusion (comme la plupart des discussions de liste &qu... |
|
| 45728636 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've used https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/ as a source here - is that actually licence-compatible with OSM? The text on https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page would suggest not.Best Regards,Andy |
| SomeoneElse | Bonjour,Vous avez utilisé https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/ comme source ici - est-ce que c'est compatible avec OSM? Le texte sur https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page suggérerait pas.Meilleures salutations,Andy |
| Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45798879 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 |
| Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45800694 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 |
| Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45838308 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 |
| Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45852519 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 |
| Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45853882 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 |
| Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45854666 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 |
| Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45872554 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 |
|
| 45742577 | SomeoneElse | Any idea about the overlap between http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471430341/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471430347 here? |
| SK53 | Yes, I plan to merge them in JOSM too tedious to do in PL2! |
| SK53 | Now done |
|
| 45737655 | SomeoneElse | Would it be possible to provide some information about what the actual change was here? |
|
| 45738160 | SomeoneElse | Hi,Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468372827 is actually a "sidewalk"? Also what were the changes in Mansfield in this change? The "duplicate node" that was removed appears to be in Skegness.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 45737617 | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just checking - have you verified that all the underlying changes here look sensible (e.g. checked that school boundary using Christian's site, checked that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4630769103 likely exists and isn't Pokemon rubbish)? If not, please don't make pure geometry changes l... |
| SomeoneElse | Oh, and please do use meaningful changeset comments."remove self intersection of area outline" will be meaningless to 99% of OSMers. |
| SomeoneElse | Also, you seem to have actually deleted the school area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449579231/history in this changeset. Any reason you couldn't just restore it rather than dobbing the tags onto a building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471363752 ? See e.g. http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/lF3 ... |
|
| 45701364 | SomeoneElse | Oops,There was something at latitude 0, longitude 0 in here as well, like there was in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44267960 .Do you know how it can have got there?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 45721537 | SomeoneElse | Oops - looks like a bug similar to the one mentioned in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43801435 is still there (adding things at null island this time, not moving them there). |
|
| 45607656 | Teiron | Hey, I haven't originaly made this changes but I don't agree with opinion that they were Google Maps traced. First of all most of objects reverted were varius forms of landuse which were not that similar to Google's (especialy becouse their are approximate). All in all they seemed to be made wit... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi Teiron,The changeset source for http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42721909 is "Geoportal 2: Ortofotomapa (zdjęcia lotnicze),googlemaps". I explained the problem on there and said "If you have any questions please email the Data Working Group on data@osmfoundation.org "... |
| Teiron | Would that be possible for me to go through those changes, discern which violates Google's ToS and re-add not copied parts?Some of those were realy valuable. |
| SomeoneElse | Where we have been able to have the conversation with the author of the changeset we have sometimes been able to do investigation on a sub-changeset level, but in this case I'd be tempted to just remap based on allowable data sources - it'll probably be quicker than going through the previous edits ... |
|
| 45661817 | SomeoneElse | I've also changed a nearby TIGER-derived bridge to be the tunnel that both Bing and Mapbox aerial imagery suggest that it is. There's still _lots_ more to map around here though. |
|
| 45276973 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4616595390 really a car shop or is it just where you parked your car in Chichester?Best Regards,Andy |
| Thomas Pavenzinger | Yes, sorry i just park my car there. |
|
| 45192290 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4609905889 really a "chalet", or is it just somewhere that you were staying run by someone called Celia?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 45176978 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!You may not be aware, but when you edit OpenStreetMap you're editing a map that everyone can see, not just your personal copy. I'm guessing that "Mum" here is not be a tourist attraction as such, but just a bookmark.Please do continue editing, but p... |
|
| 45518905 | SomeoneElse | Hello, you've changed a bus stop name here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/469760772/history from "Heathrow Terminal 4" to "Spare", which doesn't make a lot of sense. Is that really what it's called?Best Regards, Andy |
|
| 45577678 | SomeoneElse | I've changed this back. Clearly the Megabus doesn't stop in the library - it wouldn't fit through the door. |
|
| 45449626 | SomeoneElse | Erm - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426558838 is the "House of Wally" in South Sudan (with Wally's Pond just to the west). Are you sure about that?Also http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468507905 is "-2 metres wide" which doesn't make a lot of sense.Cheers,Andy |
|
| 45226716 | SomeoneElse | Another mole to whack:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/281922156 |
| SomeoneElse | Ah well, looks like BushmanK beat you to that! |
|
| 44711145 | SomeoneElse | Hello - somehow a bollard got dragged accidentally here. I've corrected it, but you might still be able to see the effect on the cycle map for a few days:http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/28.73913/-13.86741&layers=CHope everything else is OK,Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 45009838 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4596826195 (Phillips Recording Studio) really a tourist attraction?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 45535790 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469253136 as a park, but it doesn't really look like one...Please don't add things to OpenStreetMap that don't exist - and I'm sure that there are lots of other things to add in Llanelli that haven't been added yet... |
|
| 45567859 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Not sure what happened here but as part of this changeset you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4638099643 at latitude 0, longitude 0.Any idea how that could have happened?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 45003303 | SomeoneElse | Hi,The Tesco building http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143029748 "migrated south" as part of this edit (presumably a new store was built) but the Tesco Pharmacy node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4624064390 hasn't moved with it. Presumably it should have done?Cheers,Andy |
|
| 45451992 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Sorry about the confusion caused by the big "North Mansfield residential landuse multipolygon". That's a relation 441994757 which has the tag "landuse=residential" on it, and has an "outer" way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4419... |
|
| 45556608 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I notice that you've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121867544/history from a recreation_ground to a park. It definitely looked more like a recreation ground than a park the last time I was there. The bus stop https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/502405... |
| SomeoneElse | Aha - found it what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151667301 was. It's part of the big "North Mansfield residential landuse multipolygon". That's a relation 441994757 which has the tag "landuse=residential" on it, and has an "outer" way https://www.openstreetmap.org... |
|
| 45495756 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Sorry about the confusion caused by the big "North Mansfield residential landuse multipolygon". That's a relation 441994757 which has the tag "landuse=residential" on it, and has an "outer" way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4419... |
|
| 45558950 | SomeoneElse | Hello inah_telenav,You've added something at "null island" in here. Can you check how lat 0, long 0 can have got into what you uploaded?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 45480294 | wdbrs | Pokemon Go vandalism |
| SomeoneElse | Pokemon "fantasy mapping" removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45534513 . |
|
| 45101694 | SomeoneElse | According to WhoDidIt one of these changes is near me - any idea of explaining which one and what the problem was? |
| dmgroom_ct | You can use WhoDidIt to drill down to the area I made the change and then look in JOSM to see what node & way I might be shown as the last user who edited it.In general I was fixing things flagged up as potential errors on the routing layer of OSM inspector http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?v... |
|
| 45414788 | SomeoneElse | "shop changes" in the changeset comment turned out to be "no shop changes needed because all of the ones that I looked at matched". |
|
| 45068069 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is this something that really exists, or (like 10 Rillington Place) are you just adding a personal marker?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 23165488 | SomeoneElse | Hi, Just spotted that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112005641 here has "soruce:prow_ref" on it here.Cheers,Andy |
| Robert Whittaker | Oops -- now fixed, thanks. |
|
| 44873538 | srbrook | What kind of shelter is this? If it is a bus shelter then add the tag:shelter_type=public_transport |
| southglos | ...and possibly move it so it's not in the middle of the road. |
| SomeoneElse | It's a MAPS.ME edit, so it's likely that it's just the house of a friend, not a shelter at all. |
|
| 43173645 | tyr_asd | Why did you remove the non Italian names from tis place node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3658626298/history (see https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavarone)?Also, the removal of bilingual names in Valle della Fersina (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3420327670/history) seems very pro... |
| fayor | Lavarone è un "comune sparso", non esiste una località abitata chiamata Lavarone, la sede comunale si chiama Gionghi. I nomi in altre lingue di Lavarone si trovano nella relazione boundary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/46505Per quanto riguarda i nomi bilingui nel ... |
| tyr_asd | How do you know? Do you live there? People on the regional mailing list (who know the local situation better than me) seem to be of a different opinion: see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it-trentino/2016-October/001094.html and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it-trent... |
| fayor | È chiaro che ognuno può avere opinioni diverse. Al momento non c'è una regolamentazione univoca. Sul wiki non si parla del Trentino (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Alto_Adige.2FS.C3.BCdtirol_.28South_Tyrol.29) e sulla lista italiana si sta cercando una sol... |
| tyr_asd | > votazioneOK, so you clearly acknowledge that a discussion has to be held (and optimally consensus has to be achieved) inside the local community in order to avoid conflicts and edit wars? Why didn't you start a discussion on this topic before changing stuff around to match your personal tas... |
| SomeoneElse | @tyr_asd given the lack of response here, I'd revert the removal of the tags. A similar thing happened in Sardinia (see talk-it https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2016-August/thread.html#54305 and much discussion after that).If someone who lives locally comes forward and says that ... |
|
| 45353598 | SomeoneElse | Hello prof Lindicus03,A number of mappers have tried to get in contact with you via changeset discussion comments - see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068 for a list. Please do respond to them - OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project and we have to work togethe... |
| SomeoneElse | Pozdravljeni prof Lindicus03,Številni izdelovalci zemljevidov so poskušali priti v stik z vami prek pripomb seznam sprememb razprave - glej http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068 za seznam. Prosimo, da se odzove na njih - OpenStreetMap je skupen projekt,... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information) |
|
| 45125163 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Something seems to have gone a bit wrong here.A way was deleted, but the nodes that form part of it didn't get deleted, so there are now a few nodes here such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4604549290 . Any idea what might have happened and what needs fixing?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 43477049 | SomeoneElse | Hello,On this changeset you've used a tag of "source=Google Street View". We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details).We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) will go throu... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46391955 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Street View derived edits |
|
| 42539736 | SomeoneElse | Hello,On this changeset you've used a tag of "source=Google Street View". We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details).We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) will go throu... |
| SomeoneElse | (Αυτόματη μετάφραση)Χαίρετε,Σε αυτή τη changeset έχετε χρησιμοποι... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45907040 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Earth usage |
|
| 42690485 | SomeoneElse | Hello,On this changeset you've used a tag of "source=Google Street View". We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details).We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) will go throu... |
| SomeoneElse | (Автоматический перевод)Здравствуйте,На этой ревизией вы использовали тег "source = Google Street View". Нам не разрешено копировать с Google Maps (см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45778053 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Earth usage |
|
| 44663690 | SomeoneElse | I notice that "Joey Samson" is editing again. Do the new changes look sensible? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Joey%20Samson/historyBest Regards,Andy |
|
| 43908377 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You appear to be using Google Maps as a source on this changeset. We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so please don't do this.We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) wi... |
| SomeoneElse | Just to confirm - I've exchanged emails with the mapper here and they've confirmed that they didn't copy anything from Google Maps here.Andy Townsend, on behalf of the DWG |
|
| 25782573 | SomeoneElse | Hi, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305813112/history used to extend from http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3104967991 but was deleted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44453803 . Does that make sense to you? An attempt to communicate with the author of that changeset didn't get anywher... |
|
| 45271638 | SomeoneElse | Hi mxrvks,Just for info, I commented about the "disputed" change over in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45210666#map=6/44.066/15.515 . There's been no response there as yet.It might be worth you commenting there (and here) about the change as well - say why you consider Kosovo... |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks. |
|
| 41439568 | SomeoneElse | This are MAPS.ME personal markers. Likely not post offices, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41439575 | SomeoneElse | This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41439623 | SomeoneElse | This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41449236 | SomeoneElse | This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
| SomeoneElse | This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41449334 | SomeoneElse | This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
| SomeoneElse | This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41449368 | SomeoneElse | This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41488700 | SomeoneElse | This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41488776 | SomeoneElse | There are MAPS.ME personal markers. Likely not post offices, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41488793 | SomeoneElse | This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41490389 | SomeoneElse | These are MAPS.ME personal markers. They are likely not post offices, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41492727 | SomeoneElse | These are MAPS.ME personal markers. They are likely not post offices, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41492740 | SomeoneElse | This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41628467 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41705679 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41705730 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41705758 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41705768 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41705778 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41705823 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41705839 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41705880 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41705903 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41705913 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41705925 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41705940 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41705956 | SomeoneElse | This is a personal MAPS.ME note. They surely aren't post offices, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41771935 | SomeoneElse | These are personal MAPs.ME notes. They surely aren't post offices, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 41794124 | SomeoneElse | These are personal MAPs.ME notes. They surely aren't post offices, but the address information may be useful. |
|
| 45236161 | SomeoneElse | Thanks! |
|
| 40051218 | luschi | Hi fayor,why have you changed the "ref=A CT-SR" from Autostrada Catania-Siracusa to "ref=A01"?There is no "A01" in Italy.what are you using at source for this change?Correct ref described in Wikipedia should be "ref=aut.CT-SR", and Mapillary image show... |
| fayor | http://www.google.it/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjktNTFhOrQAhWFSRoKHdS6BhUQFggaMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stradeanas.it%2Fsala_stampa%2Fcomunicati_stampa%2Fscarica%2Farg%2Fcomunicati%2Fid%2F15299&usg=AFQjCNFADVZthjJY21XKAjG... |
| luschi | for me this looks like a not official number from ANAS. The immage from mapillary is from August 2016 and the pdf from your link is from 2015(only this pdf use A01 for this motorway).Also is to check, if you have the license to import data from ANAS website to OSM! |
| fayor | Basta una semplice ricerca per verificare che il ref "A01", anche se non riportato nei cartelli, identifica questo tratto autostradale, seppure, ritengo, provvisoriamente. In precedenza il tratto era classificato come NSA339, ma anche in quel periodo il codice non era riportato nei cartell... |
| luschi | All these links are from ANAS or using data from ANAS.OSM use numbers what are on the streetsings and not the numbers what using some site they not can be used as source.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground corps.it link is from 2015 and use part of d... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi fayor,Looking at the changes here, it looks like signage for "aut.CT-SC" definitely appears. Do you have evidence that signage for A01 appears anywhere? Wikipedia (though not directly usable as a source) claims it has no number: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autostrada_Catania-Sirac... |
| fayor | Il numero che identifica quest'autostrada, da indicare in "ref", inizialmente era NSA339; attualmente l'Anas, che gestisce la tratta, nei propri comunicati si riferisce alla Catania-Siracusa con il codice alfanumerico A01, simile a quello delle altre autostrade italiane. "A CT-SR"... |
| SomeoneElse | The most-used tag for references that you can't use for navigation because they don't appear on signs is "official_ref" http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/official_ref . There's some usage of that further north in Italy (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kSK ). There will always be ed... |
| luschi | I dont think that the ref=A01 is correct, because in Italy existing a A1 and this bring a lot of conflicts. A01 and A1 sounds similar because I think not all will say "A zero uno" or "A zero one" The A1 go from Milano down to Napoli. and if there existing a other motorway with a ... |
| SomeoneElse | So no other evidence for "ref=A01" then? If not, I'll change it to "official_ref" in a bit.Best Regards,Andy |
| fayor | Le prove le ho già fornite; in aggiunta è stato pubblicato recentemente anche il grafo stradale Anas a questo indirizzo, dove sono indicati tutti i codici e i nomi delle strade Anas: http://www.sciamlab.com/opendatahub/it/dataset/as_grafo-stradale-anasNon siamo certo noi a decidere... |
| SomeoneElse | @fayor I don't see any evidence of signage there :)Also note that "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0" on its own is not compatible with OSM's ODBL licence. |
| SomeoneElse | In the absence of photographic evidence for A01, or other licence-compatible evidence, I've changed it back to as it was immediately before http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44335349 . Whether "aut.CT-SC" is really a ref at all is a different issue...Thanks for everyone's patience,... |
|
| 45201297 | BCNorwich | The number suggests a triangulation pillar then type=triangulation can be added. Please see here :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_pointRegards |
| Peter Fowler | Sure.I am very, very new here, and I read the paragraph,> type=triangulation, > type=observation_spot,> type=fixed_point and type=benchmark > have meaning in nautical maps, where > they refer to INT-1 codes B20, B21, B22 > and B23 respectively. Note: it would be \... |
| SomeoneElse | "type=triangulation" was a new one to me too... |
| SK53 | type=* anything should be avoided as type really should be reserved for relations. I would agree with either of survey_point or survey_point:type as being suitable values. |
| Peter Fowler | Please believe me that I had no notion how difficult I would find this. Please feel invited to fill in the correct tags perhaps from http://trigpointing.uk/trig/3033 . Further, I am not quite certain that the [wiki page that I used](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_point) is... |
| Peter Fowler | I have found, on my shelves, a paper copy of sheet 122 of the Seventh Series (Melton Mowbray) published 1962. Looking at SK865065, it is between the 500 foot and 450 foot contour line, I would judge at about 470 feet, maybe a little higher. Should I add this figure, or the one from the Garmin (149 m... |
| SK53 | Not to worry: somewhat surprisingly trig pillars are not that well documented. This discussion is useful for helping clarify what should be documented. By a remarkable co-incidence last weekend I also mapped a trig pillar featured on sheet 122 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4608321916), so it's ... |
| Peter Fowler | OK. My map does not appear to have the spot height. The green Pathfinder 896 has metric contours and a spot height of 150 and the Orange Explorer 15 is identical. My only concern is to avoid being accused of wrongful copying of the issued data from [TrigpointingUK](http://trigpointing.uk/trig/3033) ... |
| SK53 | My map is issue B/* (c) 1962, updated with PRoW and major roads 1967. I notice the map on NLS doesnt have the spot height either, and the earlier interpolated contours on the 6" and 2.5 inch OOC maps dont really agree with the spot height (http://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17&lat=52.6502... |
| Peter Fowler | Thank you.I have never previously seen that map, and I agree that the land rises quite steeply from the Uppingham Road. This triangulation pillar does not seem to be shown. Had it been erected? The OS claim that their "leveling" dates from 1963. Perhaps the contour lines on the 1937-61... |
|
| 45210666 | SomeoneElse | Hello Wetitpig0,Re the "Kosovo to disputed territory" part of the changeset comment, did you discuss that change with any of the mappers in the region?Administrative boundaries is an incredibly sensitive topic within OSM. In this particular area, there have been "edit wars" ... |
| marcrks | Hello,I dont agree with "desputed". Kosovo is a sovereign state and Serbia has no controle of it anymore. Anyone in Kosovo (especially the mappers)a are FOR administrative, doesnt matter if they are Serbian or Albanian (also Serbs accepted Kosovo already) so it should stad administrative... |
|
| 42721909 | SomeoneElse | Hello,The changeset comment here says that you are using "googlemaps" here. We are not allowed to copy from Google Earth, even if combined with other sources (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details).We (OpenStreet... |
| SomeoneElse | Witam,Komentarz changeset tutaj mówi, że używasz "GoogleMaps" tutaj. Nie wolno kopiować danych z Google Earth, nawet w połączeniu z innymi źródłami (patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F szczegóły)... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45607481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps usage |
|
| 42909305 | SomeoneElse | Hello mahahahaneapneap,Just stumbled across this changeset while uploading some changes around Scalford.Would it be possible in future to use more meaningful changeset comments? "." doesn't really explain what you did and based on what.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changes... |
|
| 45055470 | Polarbear | What does 'invented' mean here? Does the bridge exist, and you estimated the outline to the best of your knowledge; or is the bridge fictive for testing purposes?If the former, fine, just tune your changeset description. If the latter, please don't add fictive test features to the database. |
| messpert | This rather provocative comment was my protest against being *forced* to use a man_made bridge outline when I have already mapped this bridge properly.This is what I regard as a major bug in standard rendering for abandoned railways. A bridge is still a bridge and should be rendered as such, irr... |
| SomeoneElse | I'm sure that there are other map styles that render significant features such as abandoned railways; https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/openstreetmap-carto-AJT is one, but there are presumably more. |
| messpert | Andy, if you look at the last paragraph of https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-January/030819.htmlyou will see that I was trying to advocate OSM to local councillors who could not be expected to do other than look at the "standard map", at least initially.To ... |
| SomeoneElse | I'd certainly agree that it would make sense to render abandoned railways such as this one that are still major features on the ground on any map that tries to represent what's visible locally.I'm not sure about "local councillors ... could not be expected to do other than look at the "... |
| Polarbear | It were not the bridges that had been mapped for years, it were the abandoned rail tracks that are carrying the bridge attribute. man_made=bridge is for mapping bridges. It was introduced to OSM (later than the bridge=yes attribute) exactly to solve your problem (among others). |
| messpert | Well, I know this is the party line. But it doesn't seem to apply on ordinary roads, for example. And if it is to supercede the bridge tag, then why can it not be applied to ways? Trying to micro map every bridge depends on having very high quality gps or perhaps imagery.I have a pretty good gps... |
| Polarbear | There is no superseding. bridge=yes is still required on the way across the bridge. man_made=bridge is supposed to map the outline, so by definition it is an area. It is the fate of an OSM mapper that the job is sometimes easy and sometimes very hard. Please distinguish a correct database from... |
| messpert | We are going around in circles here. It is precisely because I want an accurate correct database, that I made the provocative comment.I am very well aware of the distinction between the database and myriad of renderers.I only disagree a little with @SomeoneElse in that newbies first interac... |
| SomeoneElse | Mine looks like http://88.99.83.189/maps/map8/map7d.html#zoom=16&lat=50.46714&lon=-4.47496 FWIW. |
|
| 45148739 | SomeoneElse | Oops - I've just restored version 737 over the top of this after seeing the message on talk-ca. Please revert my changeset if it's wrong.https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2017-January/007613.htmlI can see your message on the listserv archive, but for whatever reason it didn'... |
|
| 39973486 | SomeoneElse | Personally, I wouldn't add "place=isolated_dwelling" for things such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4239537498 . If a house is visible on the Bing imagery I'd add that as a house, and if the name's visible on OS OpenData I might be tempted to add that as a house name, but house and ... |
| kreuzschnabel | Why wouldn’t you, too close to Thirsk? While I use addr:housename for residential houses within larger dwellings (e.g. villages), my idea on remote places is that users should easily find them in the map, therefore I enter their names as a place on its own (provided it has a name, of course). ... |
| SomeoneElse | There's a fair amount of overuse of "isolated_dwelling" in the UK (possibly because the standard style renders it, and used to render it more prominently than it did now). I've always thought of "isolated_dwelling" as being for places that really are places - not just houses on ... |
| kreuzschnabel | Possibly because there are so many scattered dwellings in the British countryside :-) As I said, in my idea on OSM usability, someone may tell me, "I live in Melrose, near Thirsk", I’ll reply, after a quick search, "yep, got it in my map, dont need further description". If ... |
| SK53 | Strongly agree with @SomeoneElse. The place=isolated_dwelling tag is almost always a mistake in Britain. For large distinctive isolated buildings (country houses for instance) adding name to the building is fine, for smaller residences this information belongs in addr:housename. Where an isolated dw... |
| GinaroZ | place=locality is for an unpopulated place though |
| kreuzschnabel | Right Ginaro – locality is for named hillsides, pastures etcetera. (Hillsides are often tagged natural=peak which is wrong unless there really is a visible peak.) |
| SK53 | Don't be too wedded to wiki definitions. Often the locality name covers a broader area than just the buildings which have the same name. Sometimes the locality came first, sometimes the buildings. Unless one has detailed research/local knowledge it's not easy to decide & EPNS researchers spend y... |
|
| 42577584 | SomeoneElse | Hello,The changeset comment here says that you are using Google Earth and Street View here. We are not allowed to copy from Google Earth, even if combined with other sources (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details).We (Open... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45908850 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Earth usage |
|
| 42727878 | SomeoneElse | Hello,The changeset comment here says that you are using Google earth here. We are not allowed to copy from Google Earth, even if combined with other sources (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details).We (OpenStreetMap's Data... |
| SomeoneElse | (Automatische Übersetzung)Hallo,Der changeet Kommentar hier sagt, dass Sie Google Earth hier verwenden. Wir sind nicht berechtigt, von Google Earth zu kopieren, auch wenn sie mit anderen Quellen kombiniert werden (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_... |
|
| 45138312 | SomeoneElse | Please don't add "smily face" doodles (like http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465664877#map=20/-1.47332/28.99516&layers=HD ) to OpenStreetMap. |
|
| 43082882 | SomeoneElse | Hello,The changeset comment here says that you are using GoogleEarth here. We are not allowed to copy from Google Earth, even if combined with other sources (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details).We (OpenStreetMap's Data... |
| SomeoneElse | (Automatische Übersetzung)Hallo,Der Änderungssatzkommentar sagt, dass Sie hier GoogleEarth verwenden. Wir sind nicht berechtigt, von Google Earth zu kopieren, auch wenn sie mit anderen Quellen kombiniert werden (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits |
|
| 44453711 | SomeoneElse | Hello McLangerYour source tag here says "Google Earth". We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to stop doing this immediately. We (OpenStreetMap's Data Workin... |
| SomeoneElse | Hallo McLangerIhr Quellen-Tag sagt hier "Google Earth". Wir sind nicht berechtigt, von Google Maps zu kopieren (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_maps_from.3F für Details), so dass Sie aufhören müssen, dies sofort zu tun.Wir ... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45119996 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Earth tracing usage |
| McLanger | Bei der Vorbereitung meines Urlaubes in Marokko, habe ich über die Satelitenbilder von Google nach fahrbaren Pisten gesucht. Dabei ist mir aufgefallen, dass an der besagten Stelle die Piste durchgängig befahrbar ist. Wenn alles gut geht, werde ich im April diese Piste fahren und dann kommt... |
| SomeoneElse | Vielen Dank; Wir freuen uns darauf. |
| McLanger | Zur Information meine Quelle:unterhttp://www.r-malsch.de/etc/OSM_Marokko.pdfliegt das Satellitenbild mit der durchgehenden Piste. |
|
| 43936230 | SomeoneElse | Hello alexx_all,Your source tag here says "поправки с карты google". We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to stop doing this immediately.We (Op... |
| SomeoneElse | (Автоматический перевод)Привет alexx_all,Ваш источник тегов здесь говорит "поправки с карты Google". Нам не разрешено копировать с Google Maps (см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Wha... |
| mavl | Dear SomeoneElse. Data Working Group has email with an explanation. I will inform a detail soon. |
|
| 44950151 | stev | This, and many other changesets from the user appears to be erroneuous advertising information. I have also sent the user a message |
| trigpoint | You should revert them. they are spam. Shout up if you need any help. |
| SomeoneElse | For info, I added https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/843348 about a week ago. |
|
| 17535311 | Warin61 | hiWay: 235298166 has crop=beet this is USA English, crop=beetroot is UK English |
| SomeoneElse | @Warin61 it depends on the type of beet, actually. Certainly in the UK a lot aren't grown as table vegetables but to be processed into sugar at e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177546270 . The latter tend to be referred to (at least agriculturally) as "sugarbeet" - they're larger a... |
| Warin61 | There looks to be rather a large number of 'beets'! Spinach beet, silver beet, Spinach beet, yellow, red, white, Italian beetroot, field beet... http://www.webcitation.org/6Fu9TOBWl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au%2FSorting%2FBeta.html Humm ... perhaps best left alone? |
|
| 31349625 | SomeoneElse | Just checking - are you sure about the location of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33753513/history ? I was there last month, and while there is a sluice at this location the machinery's all at the other end by the mill building itself. |
| SomeoneElse | I've merged the two "Carew Tidal Mills" in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45037723 . |
|
| 44975587 | SomeoneElse | Hi, not sure what happened here but a small park seems to have been teleported from northern California to the middle of the Atlantic. any idea how that could have happened? What were you trying to do when at the time - if we could feed that info back to the app developers it might help them fix i... |
| SOSM | @trevorjaysway if you believe what happend is a bug, could you open an issue here https://github.com/MarcusWolschon/osmeditor4android/issues |
| SomeoneElse | For info, I've moved it back to its previous location in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45036953 . |
|
| 43761605 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Your changeset comment says that you used Google as a source of some of the edits in this changeset. We are not allowed to copy from Google (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to not do this again.We ... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46087845 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google-sourced edits |
|
| 44042511 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Your changeset comment says that you used Google as a source in this changeset. We are not allowed to copy from Google (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to not do this again. We (OpenStreetMap's Dat... |
| SomeoneElse | مرحبا،يقول changeset تعليقك الذي استخدمته جوجل كمصدر في هذا changeset. نحن لا يسمح لنا لنسخ من جوجل (انظر https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F لمزيد من التفاصي... |
| SomeoneElse | Bonjour,Votre commentaire sur le jeu de modifications indique que vous avez utilisé Google comme source dans ce jeu de modifications. Nous ne sommes pas autorisés à copier de Google (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_fro... |
| Ali_Alg | Source utilisé est image free de Google et parcours sur terrain |
| Stereo | Bonjour,Les images de Google ne sont malheureusement pas 'free' - elles sont gratuites, mais pas libres. Merci de ne plus les utiliser. |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45360825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google tracing usage |
|
| 44033474 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Your changeset comment says that you used Google Earth as a source in this changeset. We are not allowed to copy from Google Earth (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to not do this again. I'm sending t... |
| SomeoneElse | (Tradução automática)Olá,O comentário do conjunto de alterações diz que você usou o Google Earth como fonte neste changeset. Não é permitido copiar do Google Earth (consulte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_imag... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45697904 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Earth usage |
|
| 41880150 | manoharuss | Hi Lafeer,Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping efforts are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that you have added so many ATMs with numbers as their names. If these are personal place bookmarks, these should not have been uploaded to OSM. If these ATMs are correct, it would be great if you... |
| SomeoneElse | @manoharuss Did you ever get an answer here? Assuming these names aren't real, what's the next step? |
| manoharuss | @SomeoneElseThanks for leaving a message. I lost track of this changeset and was able to get back because you commented. I have looked through all the edits of Lafeer and found them to be inconsistent. Since the user has not many edits, I was able to download all his edits using Overpass. I have... |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks. I've commented on I comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43025905 . If there's no further reply there I can send them a "0 hour block" message (a message that they have to read before continuing editing). After that one of two things will happen - they'll either re... |
| manoharuss | @SomeoneElseFurther actions here? |
| SomeoneElse | @manoharuss They've not edited since the last changeset discussion comment so I don't think trying to 0-hour block will achieve anything. What remains is to try and figure out whether the data in changesets such as this is worth keeping or not. I'm a bit far away to comment on that; you're at leas... |
| manoharuss | @SomeoneElse sent a quick mail to Sri Lankan mailing list talk-lk. https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/241#issuecomment-260307289 |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks - hopefully someone local will comment. |
| SomeoneElse | @manoharuss - looks like talk-lk is mostly adverts for events, so I guess no reply there is not surprising. Maybe trying contacting individual mappers locally to see if they can validate or invalidate any of the locations? |
| manoharuss | @SomeoneElse, OpenStreetMap Sri Lanka group on Facebook seemed more active. Left a quick post to get traction. Hopefully, someone replies. https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/241#issuecomment-262752019 |
| manoharuss | @SomeoneElse Received a reply from a Sri Lankan community member https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/241#issuecomment-263036509 |
| SomeoneElse | @manoharuss thanks - if they can get in touch, great. |
| SomeoneElse | @manoharuss An progress from the SL community side of things? |
| manoharuss | @SomeoneElse No update from SL community :( this was the last update https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/241#issuecomment-263036509 |
| SomeoneElse | I'd be tempted to do a revert then - it seems unlikely to me that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4381518393 is an ATM.Presumably you're OK with doing a revert here? If not, let me know and I'll do it. |
| SomeoneElse | Interestingly, they've edited again - http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45015124 . Does that look plausible? |
| manoharuss | @SomeoneElse from Satellite imagery, this seems like a residential area. Seems betting and bookmaking is a legal, regulated business in Sri Lanka. There is no way to verify this mapped object by the user. From the given name tag, this could also be a personal bookmark. |
|
| 45025059 | SomeoneElse | Again with the "fix highway problems"...2 days ago I asked you about https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44950601 , no reply as yet.Please use meaningful changeset comments explaining what you changed and why, and please use smaller bounding boxes so that everyone in the UK and man... |
| chillly | I think these unanswered changeset comments have gone far enough. Undiscussed, unresponsive mass edits should be reverted. |
| dmgroom_ct | I have no idea what changeset comments were not being emailed to me, but to be fair there were enough other ways of contacting me. |
| dmgroom_ct | It would appear Google was treating all change set comment messages as Spam |
|
| 44989943 | SomeoneElse | The link isn't "dead", it's just "resting"...You can see the story onhttp://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=13010There's no data from the last 45 days. If and when there is some data, it'll presumably appear at that link. Looking for "recent data&quo... |
|
| 1576227 | SK53 | I suspect the post office mapped in Eakring (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/426994556) is an error for the post box in almost the same location. I certainly dont recall seeing a post office here in June 2015. |
| SomeoneElse | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/426994556 was added 7 years ago - it's quite possible that there was one then and isn't now. If you think it's gone, I'd just delete it. |
| SK53 | Yes, looks to have gone according to OSSV http://os.openstreetmap.org/#zoom=16&lat=53.15099&lon=-0.9938. Cant find my pic of the postbox, but I dont remember anything looking like a former PO. |
|
| 43715721 | SomeoneElse | Hello djordjes, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Your source tag here says "Google street view". Unfortunately, we are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details). We'll need to remove the... |
| SomeoneElse | Поздрав Дјордјес, и добродошли на ОпенСтреетМап!Ваш извор ознака пише "Гоогле Виев Стреет". На жалост, није нам дозвољено да копирате из Гоогле мапе (види хттп... |
| djordjes | Thank you for the correction SomeoneElse.Can you clear this sentence a little bit please:"... but from looking at the available imagery here it should be possible to re-add the outlines using the in-editor imagery that we are allowed to use."What is the in-editor imagery allowe... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi djordjes,The main OSM editors will have imagery layers listed in them (they actually fetch them from https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index ). Bing and Mapbox have both made certain sorts of imagery available to OSM (in both cases not all of the imagery they may have access to).If you'... |
| djordjes | Thank you for the detailed reply Andy. |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45132953 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Street View tracing usage |
|
| 37522271 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just noticed that you've moved https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286801689 to south of its actual position. You can see that the Bing imagery is offset here (look at the east-west GPS traces). Also, when you edit things, please take more care about where you move features to - in this case... |
| philipcullen | I think you’re right about the imagery offset. I’ve moved a few points in the immediate vicinity that were aligned with no offset to Bing, including the service road you added opposite, so that they are all offset, rather than being half and half. Hopefully it is now consistent again. |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks - and thanks for fixing the service road too. |
|
| 31943416 | SomeoneElse | Oops - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2694560369 is "building=shop=*signs"?Cheers,Andy |
| brianboru | finger trouble again. Node deleted, name added to building, with shop=yes |
|
| 44950601 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Could you explain what the highway problems were that were fixed in here? Near me the nearest change (which I found with http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=44950601 ) seems to be a nudge of a node where a footpath joins a road - was that it or was I missing something?Best Rega... |
| dmgroom_ct | mainly highways which do not connect to other highways, for a number of reasons , including:a) the 1st highway has been connected to a landarea which shares the same position as the 2nd highway.b) the 1st highway has been connected to a landarea which is very close to the position of the 2nd ... |
|
| 44954796 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Please don't make up names for things - I very much doubt that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3958908761 is called "close on Monday".Please do, instead, get the full details of the opening hours of this Albert Heijn and add it as the value for an &... |
|
| 44933420 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 44967383 | SomeoneElse | Hello Mattjon and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Here you've changed Felix Close from being a residential road to a footpath: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428762672/history . If it really is a residential road (which the underlying OS OpenData from which it was added suggests) please don't change ... |
| BCNorwich | Hi, yes welcome, another observation is that this way has ended up duplicated. When the status of the way is resolved the duplicated way should be removed.Regards Bernard |
|
| 43847423 | SomeoneElse | Hello rlngr,Your source tag here says "knowledge / guessing / google maps". We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to stop doing this immediately. We (OpenStr... |
| SomeoneElse | Hallo rlngr,Ihr Quelltag hier ist "Wissen / Vermutung / Google Maps". Wir sind nicht berechtigt, von Google Maps zu kopieren (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_maps_from.3F für Details), so dass Sie aufhören müssen, dies sofort... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46116908 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some partially Google-sourced edits |
|
| 44945175 | user_5359 | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry. |
| SomeoneElse | @user_5359 Thanks for "fighting the good fight" against invalid Pokemon Go additions like this one - if you have a problem with users continuing with edits like this, please let us know!Best Regards,Andy from the DWG. |
|
| 44928047 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've tagged the shop here as "shop=showroom". As I mentioned on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44621534 you can tag it how you like, but if you want people to actually find it I'd suggest looking at one of the more popular and descriptive values used that you can see at ... |
|
| 44903886 | SomeoneElse | Hello,It looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4585169794 got added at latitude 0, longitude 0. Perhaps wheelmap itelf should prevent this happening?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 44164620 | SomeoneElse | Hello doledechuYour source tag here says "Bing, Google street view". We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to stop doing this immediately. We (OpenStreetMap'... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45120166 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Street View tracing usage |
|
| 44495757 | SomeoneElse | Hello h-joYour source tag here says "transferred from Google". We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to stop doing this immediately. We (OpenStreetMap's Data... |
| SomeoneElse | Hallo h-joIhr Quelltag hier heißt "aus Google übertragen". Wir sind nicht berechtigt, von Google Maps zu kopieren (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_maps_from.3F für Details), so dass Sie aufhören müssen, dies sofort... |
| pitscheplatsch | @SomeoneElse Nice! Didn't know that you can speak German :) |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45064832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps tracing Usage |
|
| 44843622 | SomeoneElse | Oops - I think that your phone doesn't have a location. You've added this bike park in the middle of the Atlantic! |
|
| 43894555 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Can you explain what "Hadjer-Lamis, Chad #MissingMaps #hotosm-project-2307 #buildings #settlements #googleldnwc" means in the comment above please?As you may be well aware we're not allowed to use Google as a source for OpenStreetMap (although specifi... |
| sdlkje | All #googleldnwc edits are from a mapathon hosted by Google London, we used the Bing aerial imagery only, no Google data. |
| SomeoneElse | @sdlkje thanks for the explanation. It'd be really helpful if as well as or (even instead of) the hashtags you used meaningful comments on changesets - without those, all I see above is "Hadjer-Lamis, Chad", which is fairly obvious from the location. |
|
| 44843384 | SomeoneElse | Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3748897325 number 46 or is that next door, as previously mapped? |
| SeFaireConnaitre | Bonjour, effectivement cette agence est localisée au 46, mais étend ses bureaux jusqu'au 46 bis, Je l'ai repositionné sur le 46.Merci de vos remarquesCordialementAlain |
| SomeoneElse | Merci! |
| cquest | J'ai aussi supprimé les addr:* car cela fait un doublon. Utilisez contact:* à la place. Merci |
|
| 43634303 | SomeoneElse | Should there really be an underscore in "Берлинская_стена"?Должны ли быть действительно подчеркивание в "Берлинская_стена"? |
|
| 44635117 | Mike Baggaley | Hi,the recent change to way 125240282 doesn't seem to be correct as it appears to have inadvertently merged two different highways at a random point, taking the merged highway through the middle of buildings. Can you check what you intended?Cheers,Mike |
| Cptliam010 | I don't see a problem I have just added in a few pathements |
| Mike Baggaley | I can only assume you have replied without actually looking at way 125240282, which you can view at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125240282 . It has a point in the middle which runs completely back on itself to what appears to be a random point, taking the path through the middle of a line of hou... |
| SomeoneElse | Hello,The path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461457844 doesn't seem to match anything on the imagery. I'm guessing that you're perhaps making stuff up for Pokemon Go? If so, please don't do that - it'll just get deleted.OpenStreetMap is a map of the world as it exists, not as we'd like it ... |
| Cptliam010 | i lloked and i see the problem i dont play pokemon go and i was adding this as a school project |
| SomeoneElse | @Cptliam010 Thanks. Does http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463015775 really exist as it is currently drawn? It seems unlikely... |
| Cptliam010 | In fact it does it is a rough sketch of the paths the kids can run along and play about on |
|
| 44829101 | SomeoneElse | Hello again ZigiMigi1103,Over at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1130 I asked you to reply to where people have asked you questions in changeset discussions, and to use meaningful changeset comments. "c" on this changeset is not a meaningful comment - please describe your chan... |
| SomeoneElse | (Strojno prevajanje)Pozdravljeni spet ZigiMigi1103,Več na https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1130 sem te prosil, da odgovori, kjer so ljudje si vprašanja v seznam sprememb, razprave in uporabo smiselnih seznam sprememb pripombe. "C" na ta seznam sprememb, ni smiseln kome... |
|
| 44693876 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've changed the landuse on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291482742/history from "police" to "grass". When I was last here it was a Police dog-training facility; is it no longer used for that? If so, then "landuse=grass" doesn't really make sense as it's... |
|
| 44542646 | SomeoneElse | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/387456504/history definitely not called the Colwick Park any more? Most Toby Carveries do have a name somewhere, even if the Toby branding is more prominent. |
| sandysau | Yes you're right It should be changed back to the Colwick park. I did the changes whilst I was on the bus in the dark, but having looked again in daylight the Toby brand is more prominent but Colwick park it is. |
| SomeoneElse | Great - thanks for confirming. |
|
| 44619559 | SomeoneElse | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4568639094#map=20/51.49884/-0.16572&layers=H really a separate restaurant or perhaps a duplicate of the bistro next door? |
|
| 44619413 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add the Arabic for "cafe" as a "name" to places such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4568623592 . If it has an Arabic name then by all means add it; but if it doesn't, please don't.Also - is it perhaps a duplicate of the "Carpo" next door?\... |
|
| 44598936 | SomeoneElse | You've added Kristina records https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4567394789 as a toyshop here. Is it really that or is it a record shop? |
|
| 44598816 | SomeoneElse | You've added Flashback Records https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4567348592 as a convenience store here . Is it really that or is it a record shop? |
|
| 44574402 | SomeoneElse | I don't think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95894683 is really called "Autogril con wifi". Were you trying to map something else here? |
|
| 44567581 | SomeoneElse | Is the pub really separate to the "Inn at Ardgour"? Does it have a different name? |
| trigpoint | They were one and the same place when I was there a few years ago |
|
| 44553139 | SomeoneElse | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2917982861 now has conflicting names - you'll need to use a proper editor (not MAPS.ME) to change it. If it's a Byron Burger I'm guessing that the cuisine is no longer Spanish also? |
|
| 42794737 | SomeoneElse | Any reason why you added an English name of "test" to http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2242754314 ?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 44687916 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4573675741 perhaps a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4278033118 (also added by you) just to the south?Best Regards,Andy |
| Thomas Hills | Thanks Andy! I've gone through and removed all the offending nodes...Best wishes,Tom |
|
| 43988405 | pitscheplatsch | Hi cartagena68, welcome to the OpenStreetMap project. May I know the reason behind deleting several highways in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43988405 |
| SomeoneElse | Hi @pitscheplatsch - any news on this one? Does it need reverting? |
| pitscheplatsch | @SomeoneElse no news here. I think we/you should revert it. |
| SomeoneElse | @pitscheplatsch - I've checked a few of these and the deletions actually look OK - there's been a "delete / redraw" process when adding roundabout flares, for example. |
|
| 44432049 | pitscheplatsch | Hi Daniel Gamboa Alvarez, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting many POIs in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44432049 |
| SomeoneElse | @pitscheplatsch does this need reverting? It looks like it might be a "I think I'm editing my own personal map" type of problem. |
| pitscheplatsch | @SomeoneElse same here, no answer. I think we/you should revert it. |
| SomeoneElse | OK, done. |
|
| 5329108 | SomeoneElse | Hi,I was tidying up after a new user who'd made a few unfortunate edits, and came across https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69886258 , which dates from rather earlier :)It's mapped as "layer=1; tunnel=yes" - is that because it's in the air but covered?Just check it wasn't accidental.\... |
| randomjunk | Yeah, it was deliberate :-)The tunnel is basically a pedestrian bridge over the road and pavements integrated into a building. |
| DaveF | As it's above ground level, would covered=yes be more appropriate than tunnel? |
| randomjunk | As I remember it it's not really "open on one side", and just a passage through the building with a very subway-tunnel-like feel. Don't think I've actually used in in the last 6 years though so I may be misremembering. |
| DaveF | Ah, I've never really agreed with the 'has to be open at the sides' argument, but as an alternative, how about tunnel=building_passage (72 711 occurrences) |
|
| 43175751 | nammala | Hi Yulia_Car,Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting `natural=wood`. Regards,krishna |
| SomeoneElse | Hi @nammala,What are the planned next steps with this one?Cheers,Andy |
| nammala | Hi Andy,The user still didn't get back and there is no changes to the changeset. Would you like go ahead and revert the changeset.Cheers,nammala |
|
| 44030446 | SomeoneElse | Is there really a postbox called "Kimberly Clark" here? Kimberly-Clark is the company that makes toilet paper; what exactly are you suggesting that people put in this post box? |
| Humus015 | Thanks, I already change it 7 hors ago. |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks. |
|
| 44334679 | SomeoneElse | Despite the source listed here, from discussions with the mapper the only changest in this series with Google-derived content is http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44387103 (that's now been reverted and redacted). |
|
| 44387103 | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44765549 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in Albania |
|
| 44739583 | SomeoneElse | Hello,As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and long... |
| RadoslawJ | Hey,During my work I accidentaly zoom out and then I must click something by accident. Thanks for correct my mistake.Best Regards |
|
| 44711732 | chillly | Welcome to OSMWhen I see your first edit deleting stuff with comment of deleting excessive detail, this is worrying. OSM wants MORE detail not less. Why have you deleted stuff like this? |
| chillly | Looking at this more closely I have reverted this edit. There is no way all this should be deleted. |
| BCNorwich | Just wanted to add support to the decision to revert this changeset. It's very easy to make mistakes when you first jump into OSM mapping, I'm sure freefromsociety can make positive contributions. Just takes little research as to best practices first. |
| SomeoneElse | Whilst it might make sense to restore some of this detail, I'm a bit sceptical about others - I doubt that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385445828 is any sort of "pedestrian area", for example. |
| trigpoint | Also, whilst not part of this changeset. The A16 is incorrectly mapped as a dual carriageway. This could use a tidy up. |
|
| 44494285 | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. What is actually here, is it a building or simply a signpost.I imagine that you have made a typo and it is spelt Centre rather than the American way?Cheers Phil |
| SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that it's a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/410268974 , actually. |
| vbth | Hi, the place might be right but the name was only Cymraeg for village Hall. Also it was not visioble on the (offline) map. therefore i set an named it. Just give it a "i"-button an name it "Myddfai Community Hall & Visitor Centre". thanks.http://www.myddfai.org/ |
| SomeoneElse | @vbth I wouldn't worry too much about what any particular map does or doesn't show, since they all show different things. I've tried to merge everything together and added a building in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462068160 . |
| vbth | thank you. |
|
| 43478593 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Just to be clear "google satellite view" isn't a valid source for OpenSrteetMap (although "I've been here" is perfectly OK of course). For more detailssee https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F . If you've got any q... |
|
| 43894083 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Can you explain what "Hadjer-Lamis, Chad #MissingMaps #hotosm-project-2307 #buildings #settlements #googleldnwc" means in the comment above please?As you may be well aware we're not allowed to use Google as a source for OpenStreetMap (although specifi... |
|
| 43927800 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what "#hotosm-project-2286, #MissingMaps, Mwezeni, #Zimbabwe Added #roads and #settlements using Bing #googledub" means please? As you may be well aware we're not allowed to use Google as a source for OpenStreetMap (although specific post-disaster exceptions have s... |
| dónal | Hi Andy!#googledub refers to the group of volunteers in Dublin, Ireland that engage with HOT / MSF to support their efforts to map vulnerable areas of the world. Volunteers rely on the imagery provided to HOT for their mapping efforts (not google maps).Feel free to message me directly if you... |
|
| 44225033 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You appear to be using Google Maps as a source on this changeset. We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so please don't do this. We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) w... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45276509 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps tracing usage |
|
| 44166037 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You appear to have used "google.cn" imagery in iD in this changeset. We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details). We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) will look at t... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44672115 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China |
|
| 44656368 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!This project is about mapping the world as it actually exists - we're very grateful for all of the Pokemon players who've added unmapped footpaths parks and water features in the last few days, especially in places in the world where there aren't many "on ... |
|
| 44303719 | SomeoneElse | Hello Felyme,In this and some previous changesets you appear to be using "google.cn" imagery to trace from. We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details)We (OpenStreetMap's Dat... |
|
| 42610708 | yurasi | Hi AlphaDev,Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed you deleted a road for was dangerous in case of rain. But, I think that the road should remain because is visible on satellite imagery and is important for the comunity. |
| SomeoneElse | @yurasi - I'd be tempted to restore this; it looks like it still exists. |
|
| 40651812 | manoharuss | Hi msyam,Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping efforts are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that you have added numbers to POIs names. The name tag is to specify the name of the business or establishment, not numbers. It would be great if you can fix this or I would have to revert your ... |
| SomeoneElse | Hi Manohar,Any thoughts about this one?The names are clearly implausible, but it'd be great to try and find out what the user's trying to record here.Best Regards,Andy |
| manoharuss | @SomeoneElse Thanks for your comment. Apologies for my late reply. I opened a ticket in Mapbox mapping repository to track cleanup of the user edits (https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/251) and put together a gist noting down my observations (https://gist.github.com/manoharuss/3491a33c1b163dc2... |
| SomeoneElse | @manoharuss It looks like there's been no attempt to contact the mapper for 5 months?Some of the edits seem plausible (the name of the petrol station here for example) some less so (the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4498784392 doesn't sound like a bank) so if no contact can be made a ... |
| manoharuss | @SomeoneElse left a personal message to the mapper to encourage participation in this changeset discussion(https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/251#issuecomment-268164570). Have not received a reply yet. What do you suggest on next actions? |
| SomeoneElse | The usual stuff to try now would be to try and find a local mapper forum, or even just a local mapper, and consider an Arabic translation of any message. If that fails, I'd just revert it - on the balance of probability they're just personal markers.Cheers,Andy |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45037169 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some numbered objects in Gaza (suspected personal notes). All attempts to contact the mapper have failed. |
| manoharuss | @SomeoneElse Thanks for cleaning this up |
|
| 23120401 | SomeoneElse | Hello, You've added what looks like supermarket opening hours to a bus stop https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/565762137/history here. Did you really mean to do that, or did you perhaps mean to update the nearby supermarket https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58758439 ?Hope you don't mind me chec... |
| EstelleT | Hello Andy,Thanks for making me aware of this issue! I was confused at first because I don't recall having made an edit to OpenStreetMap, but it looks like this was done by a third party opening hours app I use. I've deleted the opening hours (I think) and will let the app developer know.Regards... |
|
| 44621683 | SomeoneElse | Hi,I think that something has gone a bit wrong with http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404895135/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461376052/history - they have a name and a "source" tag, but nothing else.What actually are they?Hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just t... |
|
| 44621534 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've changed the shop type here from "furniture" to "Showroom". If you can buy furniture there then I'd suggest "furniture" is the better tag, since nothing will recognise the "Showroom" tag. Presumably it's your shop and you want people to be able... |
|
| 44624915 | SomeoneElse | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44626504 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some numbered tourist attractions. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1125 |
|
| 44539759 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Just to let you know, we are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details). I thought that it's best to let you know to prevent any future issues.I've also remo... |
|
| 44562104 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Just to let you know, we are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details). I can see that the changeset comment here is partly a Google Street View URL, but I c... |
| SomeoneElse | Здравейте и добре дошли на OpenStreetMap!Само да ти кажа, не ни е позволено да се копира от Google Maps (виж https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F за подробности). Ви... |
|
| 44590233 | SomeoneElse | Hello,In the "source" on this changeset you've said "bing;survey;gps;asig;google". Can you explain what use you've made of Google here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details for more details about this.Pl... |
| DenisJu | Hello,i use the orthophoto (8 cm, 2015) from http://geoportal.asig.gov.al/ and sometimes the street view (google) for the verification of the category of the road (paved, unpaved)!Regards,Denis |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks DenisJu.We'll have to remove contributions based on Google, since the licence isn't compatible with OSM. What's the licence associated with http://geoportal.asig.gov.al/ ?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 43645395 | yurasi | Hi havelock osoro.Thank you for contributing to HOT and OSM. I noticed you deleted some roads, I suggest reverting this deletion and connect those island roads to an existing one. And about the buildings, you can trace them again. |
| SomeoneElse | @yurasi Any thoughts about this? As you suggest it'd make sense to revert the deletions here. |
|
| 43019588 | Maanya | Hey Paddyssentongo,Your efforts on adding data on to OSM is deeply appreciated. Could you please let the community, know the source of house and the church that has been added in this locality. They do not seem to be present on the satellite image. Thank you. |
| SomeoneElse | @Maanya This just looks like a doodle to me, so I've reverted it. Personally if I haven't received a reply from a mapper in a couple of weeks I'd assume that they are either ignoring the message or (likely in this case as no further edits) they've never seen it. If you ever wonder what to do next ... |
|
| 43369110 | manoharuss_imports | Hi celisab,Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that you have deleted a well traced river here. It seems to exist in satellite imagery as well. If this is an accidental deletion, we can undo the change. If this was intentional, may I know the ... |
| SomeoneElse | @http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/manoharuss_imports given that the user here is new (15 edits since October) and there's something visible on the Bing imagery where the river is supposed to be, and there's been no response here, I'd be tempted to undeleted the river and look at the user's other co... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46332241 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in Argentina following discussion with someone from the Argentine community. All attempts to contact the mapper have failed |
|
| 43883720 | SomeoneElse | Is "Rillington Place 10" really a tourist attraction, and is it here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4516194593 |
| shawmat | 10 Rillington Place was the house where John Christie murdered several women in the 1950s. What made it even more notorious was that a lodger at the house, Timothy Evans, was convicted of the murder of his wife and was executed. But it had been Christie that did it. More than any other case, the wr... |
| Paul Berry | There is no trace whatsoever left of Rillington Place or any of the properties that lined it. So although this might be the geographical point at which the infamous house, wash-house and gardens stood, nothing physical remains at all (quite deliberately). When the area was redeveloped in the 1970s i... |
|
| 43996621 | SomeoneElse | Hi,Just for info, I've deleted the Hambleton Village Halls here, as it's a duplicate of one that already existed.Cheers,Andy |
|
| 44308428 | trigpoint | Hi, Attack Snooker Club seems a very odd name for a pub. Are you sure it isn't a social club? |
| SomeoneElse | It's also a duplicate (same mapper) of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4548245699 . |
|
| 44346692 | SomeoneElse | Isn't "Shop 'n' Drive" the convenience store brand used by Esso? |
| vwJim | When I drove past there was no Esso branding.A Google search of Shop 'n' Drive showed up the company behind Shop 'n' Drive have being buying up locations from Esso etc |
|
| 44465928 | SomeoneElse | You may not be aware, but when you edit OpenStreetMap you're editing a map that everyone can see, not just your personal copy. Please do continue editing, but please do only add things that are verifiable on the ground. If you want to add a personal bookmark to MAPS.ME you can - just select the thin... |
|
| 44471197 | SomeoneElse | As requested, I've deleted this. |
|
| 44498141 | SomeoneElse | Hi,Any reason for the deletion of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345706648/history in here?Best Regards,Andy |
| yzemaze | I saw a turning_circle and mapped it. Maybe deleting the appendix was overzealous. |
|
| 44484007 | BCNorwich | You should have been alerted by my comments by now. So can you please finish with adding fiction to the map? It's rather a silly game but you've shown that you do have good skills for mapping. The OpenStreetMap community would like to make you welcome to contribute in a more constructive way.All B... |
| SomeoneElse | @BCNorwich , see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1122 . |
| BCNorwich | @SomeoneElse, Have you removed all the fiction? As I usually follow up what I comment on.Regards |
| SomeoneElse | @BCNorwich http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kLz finds couple of nodes created in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44483642 - that probably needs looking at to see what joins were created there. |
|
| 43776361 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!In here you've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4509038290 as a tourist attraction, but it looks like it's already there as a railway station just across the railway track. Was that deliberate, or is there really only one of them?Hope you don't mind me... |
|
| 44434507 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4556191294 just someone's house?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 20275546 | SomeoneElse | Hi,Andy from the Data Working Group hereA quick question (prompted by another mapper) about http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=138891352 . As can be seen, you've added a bunch of new tags on there such as "bicycle=yes", lanes=2" and "oneway=no". I know that this w... |
|
| 44303366 | SomeoneElse | Hello Namazov,Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've reverted Nagorno-Karabakh back how it was before you edited it. Please don't make arbitrary politically-motivated changes to country names without wider discussion beforehand. If you have any questions please contact OpenStreetMap's Data Working Grou... |
|
| 44497876 | SomeoneElse | Force-reverting some further objects based on google.cn sourced data in Taiwan |
| Supaplex | WOW, a big changeset. I thought I already revert some edit. So I miss something. |
| SomeoneElse | Hi Supaplex,To get the list I downloaded all the changesets from the user concerned, searched for all those that used google.cn imagery and reverted those. I then looked at all the reversions that failed because of subsequent edits and force-reverted those. In changesets such as this one. It wa... |
|
| 44517254 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 44502050 | SomeoneElse | And force-deleting the remaining objects based on google.cn sourced data in China |
|
| 44501113 | SomeoneElse | Force-reverting the remaining objects based on google.cn sourced data in China |
|
| 44389364 | pitscheplatsch | Hi acevedoa1, again, please check your tools. This ATM has been created several times. Please remove duplicate data. |
| SomeoneElse | @pitscheplatsch See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44500466 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1120 . |
|
| 32409987 | DaveF | Hi Snake SkinThere's an expression in OSM: 'Don't tag incorrectly to suit the renderer'.For accuracyIf a KG is a KG then it should be tagged as such. If you wish an item to be visible in a specific render you should contact the person creating the tiles.CheersDave F. |
| Snake Sting | Why don't kissing gates or stiles show up on OSM? What I mean is when you zoom right it will tell you if you hover the mouse over the node but not as a symbol on the map like gates. It would be very usefull for anybody on a bike knowing if there is a ton of stiles or kissing gates to leave bike an... |
| DaveF | Sorry for the delayed reply.OSM is a database. Lot's of different rendering are mad from this one source. It allows map creators to add relevent data & ignore what the don't want.What's now described as the 'standard' map ie the mapnik rendering unfortunately doesn't render all barriers. I... |
| DaveF | Err... try https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues |
| SomeoneElse | Looks like geocaching.com (if that's what you're talking about) offer lots of different background styles, but don't host any themselves, so you'd just have to lobby for one of those to support it; not necessarily openstreetmap-carto. |
| SomeoneElse | Just for info, I've just added a separate "kissing_gate" icon to https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/openstreetmap-carto-AJT (that's a style that other people can use if they want to). See https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L877 for which gate types ar... |
| trigpoint | Not really a comment on the mapping, or the rendering, but if a PROW has stiles or kissing gates then it is a public footpath. You should not be taking a bike on such paths. |
| DaveF | There's nothing to prevent someone pushing a bike; although a few walkers have disagreed with me. |
|
| 44454540 | trigpoint | Please do not add spam to name tags or change the name of bus stops away from their official name. I am removing these tags. |
| SomeoneElse | Actually, I'd suggest adding a "real_ale" tag, like here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354421040 .You won't be able to do this from MAPS.ME, but you will from the web-based editors at openstreetmap.org. |
|
| 43929584 | pitscheplatsch | Hi Maxim Solis, welcome to the OpenStreetMap project. May I know the reason behind deleting many tracks in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43929584 |
| SomeoneElse | @pitscheplatsch - does this need reverting (no response or new edits from the mapper in 3 weeks)? |
| pitscheplatsch | @SomeoneElse Yes, I think so. Thx. |
| SomeoneElse | OK, done in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44476206 . |
|
| 44201253 | SomeoneElse | Is the name of 117730 correct? It was last edited by a user who changed it from what I thought it was called. |
|
| 43603478 | trigpoint | Hi, this looks a very odd place for a shop to be located. Is it a bakery factory? |
| SomeoneElse | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/819653 |
| trigpoint | Reverted after user did not respond to changeset comments |
|
| 43958005 | pitscheplatsch | Hi Vincent Zhao, welcome to the OpenStreetMap project. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways and pois in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43958005 |
| SomeoneElse | @pitscheplatsch Does this (and possibly 43958066) still need reverting? Someone mentioned on IRC a few days ago that it might - There are a lot of deletes here and I'm guessing that the other one is a redraw. |
| pitscheplatsch | @SomeoneElse Yes, I think so. I didn't revert anything. |
| pitscheplatsch | @SomeoneElse Thx! |
| SomeoneElse | @pitscheplatsch Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44469749 . Some of the data here still looks a bit iffy, but at least it's there. |
|
| 42486059 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what you were trying to do to http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4494580 in this changeset? A comment of "Asia" does not really explain it.There previously were two South Ossetia / Tskhinvali Region relations, http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4494580 and ... |
| Dinamik | Hi! If I remember correctly, the deleted relation was a duplicate of relation of the same object, which was created earlier. You wrote by yourself, that there were two South Ossetia relations. |
| SomeoneElse | Hi Dinamik,Thanks for the reply above. Someone's restored the admin_level=3 South Ossetia http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1152717 , so things are back to a previous situation now I think.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 44413943 | SomeoneElse | Just checking - does http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/206654 make any sense now? My recollection was when I added that note that was a service road running through where the Travelodge building was - is that wrong, and the second access is into what OSM has as the Little Chef and Subway (and is it... |
|
| 44435058 | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that these are "gift" shops? If they're really record shops please don't map them as something else.You can see what shop tags are in use looking at http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/shop#values . "shop=music" seems to be the most popular tag for record shops... |
| trigpoint | Also please check that what you are adding is in the correct place. For example Piccadilly Records is already mapped some distance from your addition.Your additions of one type of object is spead over a very large area, what is your source of information/location. |
|
| 44429682 | SomeoneElse | Oops, looks like the bounding box here became a bit large by accident :) |
|
| 44409238 | SomeoneElse | It would be really helpful here if the bounding box for two changes didn't include about a quarter of the planet. That way local mappers can see what has been affected near them.Best Regards,Andy |
| samely | Hi AndyThanks for notifying this since we realized that we are generating big bounding boxes using to-fix plugin. We are working on fixing this bug and tracking here https://github.com/JOSM/tofix/issues/74. |
|
| 44347502 | SomeoneElse | It would be really helpful here if the bounding box for two changes didn't include about a quarter of the planet, as previously mentioned on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39721595.Best Regards,Andy |
| ediyes | Hey Andy,Thanks for noticing this, we have a problem with the to-fix plugin, right now we are working to resolve this bug here https://github.com/JOSM/tofix/issues/74 |
|
| 44294583 | SomeoneElse | The image link on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4547299733 seems to be broken? |
|
| 44299153 | SomeoneElse | Hello, which was the "watery island" that you fixed? |
|
| 44329075 | SomeoneElse | It'd be helpful to other mappers if you reduce the size of the bounding boxes of your changesets. That way people would be able to see what's changed in their local area. Also, it'd be great to use language that talked about the things affected (paths, houses, etc. rather than say things like &quo... |
|
| 44324757 | majkaz | Hi, thanks for adding to the map - but I have noticed that you have added features already there or used wrong tags. Could you please try to correct it? |
| SomeoneElse | @majkaz If after a few more days you haven't got a response to these and the same sort of mapping is continuing it ay just be that the user used a throw-away email address to sign up to MAPS.ME with (or doesn't understand English). Either way, you can try emailing the Data Working Group at data@osm... |
| majkaz | @SomeoneElseI got contacted from the HOTOSM side of this - there is some legit use of maps.me from several users resulting in newbie mistakes and technically wrong edits. We are now trying to work out what can be done to improve the contact with the local mappers and to improve the quality of the ... |
| benosea | Hi, Thank you so much for the comments.I am apologising for late responses and any inconveniences I am causing to the map.Responses to the comments;1. Position of the pointsIt is true that the points I have been adding are on road, however , they are real representing the feature named. ... |
|
| 44409366 | SomeoneElse | Force-reverting some further objects based on google.cn sourced data in China |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | Force-reverting some further objects based on google.cn sourced data in China |
| 中鲁潍昌 | Please give me a list of deleted data in order to restore the Bing map. Thank you 请给我一个删除数据的列表，以便在bing地图上恢复。谢谢。 |
| SomeoneElse | As mentioned by email, the list of changesets can be seen in the comment added to http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44403770 . |
|
| 42095720 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what you were trying to do to http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1152717 in this changeset and your more recent change? A changeset with no comment does not really explain it.There previously were two South Ossetia / Tskhinvali Region relations, http://www.openstreetmap... |
|
| 42352393 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what you were trying to do to http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4494580 in this changeset? A changeset with no comment does not really explain it.There previously were two South Ossetia / Tskhinvali Region relations, http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4494580 and ht... |
|
| 43350631 | SomeoneElse | Hello,I followed a link from http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/2080 to get here. There have been a few problems recently with people adding buildings around "null island" - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43413997?node_page=60#map=3/-3.60/56.16 is the most recent, but there have b... |
| SomeoneElse | Hello - I notice you're back and mapping again - would it be possible to answer the question above?Best Regards,Andy |
| Dewi Sulistioningrum | Hi Andy,sorry for late reply. The problem above occur because the new user OpenStreetMap from participants Mapathon in ITS Surabaya. Before they did mapathon, we provide training material "Beginner OpenStreetMap". They inadvertently uploaded the sample data from part training http://le... |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks Dewi.learnosm's "sample.osm" used to turn up fairly regularly (see https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm/issues/335 ). It was fairly easy to spot because it used to have names such as "Happy Park" and "Cat Forest" in it. The recent examples were slightly differe... |
| SomeoneElse | For info, another one:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44388973#map=3/2.64/43.22&layers=H |
|
| 44388973 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.It's been deleted now, but have you any idea ho... |
|
| 44388695 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?Best Regards,Andy |
| pitscheplatsch | reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44396030 |
|
| 35173363 | SomeoneElse | Hello,I'm not sure what happened, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3824820400/history was a school in the middle of the sea.I've deleted it.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 36760633 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392993754 is? It doesn't have any tags on it.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 42833010 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4444060192 supposed to be a joke, or are you trying to say that there really is a "memorial" at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 44005364 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Not sure what happened here but https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4526202694/history got added in the middle of the sea.I've deleted it.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 31931343 | SomeoneElse | Hello,I don't know what happened here, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3590668378/history got added in the middle of the sea.I've deleted it.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 29342708 | SomeoneElse | Hi,Not sure what happened here, but you added a hotel in the middle of the sea https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3390520857/history . I've deleted it.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 39006416 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4158291366/history is? It's not in Peru.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 43723453 | SomeoneElse | Hello,Can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4506047052/history is? It seems very odd.Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 43861420 | BCNorwich | Outlined areas of heath you have mapped have several sections where the line doubles back on itself. It's really very easy to map areas like this correctly. Please read up on better methods as you are repeatedly doing this. See http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-4.08161&lat=5... |
| BCNorwich | Removed several area outline self intersections and re-tagged areas. Much better now. |
| SomeoneElse | @BCNorwich - thanks. |
|
| 36015777 | SomeoneElse | Hello, can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386386007 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3897043914 are? It seems odd to have a "naval base" offshore here? |
|
| 43883626 | muralito | INE * are not street names. Are names used internally by www.ine.gub.uy in their maps- |
| SomeoneElse | Should the "Ine" names be moved from "name" to "ref", or are they something else? |
| muralito | Not automated, because some "ine" streets are names adopted by the neighbours. To add or remove a "ine" name a detailed survey is needed (probably talking with people living there), or if KG actually surveyed street signs with that name that's ok. |
|
| 43611434 | SomeoneElse | Hello msyam,Can you explain what http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4498784392 is? You may not know, but when you add things to MAPS.ME they get added to a map that everyone can see.Best Regards,Andyمرحبا msyam،هل يمكن ان توضح ما هو http://www.openstreetmap.org/node... |
| SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45037169 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some numbered objects in Gaza (suspected personal notes). All attempts to contact the mapper have failed. |
|
| 44241176 | SomeoneElse | As I mentioned back in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42920193 and previously, you've re-added an imaginery name:fr to part of the M1 and M18 here. I drive these roads fairly regularly and can assure you that no such name is signposted. As previously discussed in http://www.openstreetmap.org... |
|
| 44244656 | SomeoneElse | What were the usage statistics on "shop=candle" and "shop=candles" before you changed e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4401825186/history ? |
| SomeoneElse | You might also want to double-check the spelling of the "Yankie" in here too, or check with the original mapper. |
| LeTopographeFou | Hi, since only "candles" is documented on the wiki and was mostly used, I pick this one to consolidate the use of this type of shop. A bit of math: there was 37 shop=candle vs 102 shop=candles. Reguarding "Yankie" I decided to focus this type of mass edit to the bare minimum, i.e... |
| SomeoneElse | Thanks for that. I'll have to add "candles" to https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua . |
|
| 44267960 | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it goes well into the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added at latitude 0, longitude 0.It's been deleted now, bu... |
|
| 44257367 | SomeoneElse | "remapping all the lowest numbered OSM nodes still in the database" has got to be one of the stranger OSM projects... |
| EzekielT | I think it may wreck ancient OSM heritage, in fact. They're the first nodes in the database; they're all very special :)! |
|
| 43414281 | SomeoneElse | Hello,I think some roads got deleted by accident here - see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/53312/can-someone-reinstate-some-deleted-ways . I've undeleted them in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44243311 - can you check that everything looks OK now?Best Regards,Andy |
|
| 44054520 | SomeoneElse | For info, I've removed the "name" from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456745571 as it's really not named that. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only for more info. |
|
| 43728508 | SomeoneElse | Which is the "the map" that you're talking about here? There are lots of maps created with OpenStreetMap data - please don't tag something incorrectly so that it shows up on one particular rendering. Just try and tag it as accurately as possible and let each individual renderer worry abo... |
|
| 43699389 | SomeoneElse | Hello, I'm confused - the changeset comment says "Setting Peak Rail tags to preserved" yet this changeset changes Peak Rail from railway=preserved to railway=rail? Presumably you've tried to follow what the wiki says at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=rail , but that's n... |
|
| 44209146 | SomeoneElse | For info, the _actual_ location of this buoy is supposed to be listed at http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/data/realtime2/13010.drift . That hasn't updated in a month or so, but in theory should give the present location. However, given that it's drifting around 0,0 it makes as much sense as any just to us... |
| glglgl | Thanks for the additional info. Maybe we should add this to the node. |