Glassman participated in the following changeset discussionsGlassman participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168250286 by Artistimoso @ 2025-06-29 04:54 | 1 | 2025-06-29 15:57 | Glassman | It appears that the parking lot already exists. Since these are duplicates, I removed them. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168250286 |
| 168249575 by CCK29 @ 2025-06-29 03:57 | 1 | 2025-06-29 15:53 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168249575 |
| 168237593 by Jacobl Rose @ 2025-06-28 18:03 | 1 | 2025-06-29 15:52 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168237593 |
| 168238226 by Jacobl Rose @ 2025-06-28 18:22 | 1 | 2025-06-29 15:33 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168238226 |
| 168237958 by Jacobl Rose @ 2025-06-28 18:15 | 1 | 2025-06-29 15:32 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168237958 |
| 168116337 by Aged Corn @ 2025-06-26 00:44 | 1 | 2025-06-26 19:20 | Glassman | #TIP: You can also draw a polygon around the facility and label it as the sportsman club instead of the buildings. |
| 168115127 by mangopower @ 2025-06-25 23:00 | 1 | 2025-06-26 19:14 | Glassman | #TIP: When a building has multiple addresses, add them as nodes as you did, but the building doesn't need and address. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168115127 |
| 168072654 by yolojess @ 2025-06-25 02:17 | 1 | 2025-06-25 12:35 | Glassman | You might want to check the county data at https://psearch.kitsap.gov/psearch/. If the way you tagged as a path is wide enough for a car, it might just be a driveway, tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. Let me know if you need help figuring this out. --- ... |
| 2 | 2025-06-25 12:36 | Glassman | You might want to check the county data at https://psearch.kitsap.gov/psearch/. If the way you tagged as a path is wide enough for a car, it might just be a driveway, tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. Let me know if you need help figuring this out. --- ... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-25 22:27 | yolojess ♦1 | It is absolutely not. Starting from GM-5 (to the east on this map), I walked this 'road' to the point where I cut it off. I think more of it will be cut off. It is bushwhacking, not a road, not a driveway. Parts, after you climb over a large downed tree by the intersection with GM-5, do ha... | |
| 4 | 2025-06-25 22:29 | yolojess ♦1 | The roads that are questionable are not on https://psearch.kitsap.gov/psearch/ (and I think that is more correct, but I have not attempted to set foot on the rest of those segments yet) | |
| 5 | 2025-06-25 22:32 | Glassman | Sounds like it should be removed. Thanks for following up. | |
| 168071380 by CollinSmid7 @ 2025-06-25 00:34 | 1 | 2025-06-25 12:19 | Glassman | #TIP: If the business occupies the entire building, just tag the building with the business information instead of duplicating some of the information on a node. If multiple businesses operate in a building, then add each as a node. --- Published using OSMCha:... |
| 167897548 by Lesa Glick @ 2025-06-21 04:25 | 1 | 2025-06-24 12:37 | Glassman | I changed the loop road at the end of the residential road to a driveway. Let me know if that is not correct. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167897548 |
| 167851746 by Flounder71 @ 2025-06-20 04:13 | 1 | 2025-06-20 04:15 | Flounder71 ♦1 | new to this. use his data maps at work that cost money. |
| 2 | 2025-06-24 11:17 | Glassman | 58th does look like a private road, unless it is marked with no trespassings signs, the tag motor_vehicle = private should not be used. Instead I would suggest the tag ownership=private. Can you review this edit? Let me know if you need help. --- Published usi... | |
| 167705980 by mpadco @ 2025-06-16 17:48 | 1 | 2025-06-17 17:02 | Glassman | #TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM, the reason is that software has a hard time undoing abbreviations. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167705980 |
| 167655228 by GA_Kevin @ 2025-06-15 15:01 | 1 | 2025-06-15 19:27 | Glassman | Thanks for adding the charging stations. However, I'd like to point out that the node 12917566746 does not match the address tags location. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167655228 |
| 2 | 2025-06-15 20:55 | GA_Kevin ♦22 | Hm, yeah I see that. I remember looking at that one to verify because it has such a high amount of level 2 chargers. I suspect the address is right but the pin is wrong. The lat/long is from AFDC directly. But it seems this is meant for the library complex which is on the street it’s tagged as... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-15 21:33 | Glassman | It is currently pinned at the old library location, which never had any chargers. The new location has them located on the upper floors. Because of this error, I'm wonder how good the rest of the data is | |
| 4 | 2025-06-16 21:48 | mappingman2 ♦3 | Dos this have to be a single US-wide changeset instead of one change per station? | |
| 5 | 2025-06-17 03:23 | GA_Kevin ♦22 | I suppose it doesn't have to be but there's 2 reasons I'd say I do:1) I don't know how to split it up automatically in JOSM.2) The wiki page for this project is updated each week with the changeset link so you can go back to previous weeks. If each were individual, I thin... | |
| 167576739 by Carterthefarter7 @ 2025-06-13 13:50 | 1 | 2025-06-14 19:30 | Glassman | A couple of questions. Why is the road designated as permissive? It appears to be a privately maintained road so I can see adding ownership=private, but unless there are signs marking the road as restricted, then a access tag is unnecessary.Also, you changed the south end to a power line with a ... |
| 2 | 2025-06-14 21:20 | Carterthefarter7 ♦1 | Hi, Sorry for the confusion. I am unsure how to label this. This road is a privately maintained road that ends at my driveway. 14489. The south end is not part of the road. It is a power line access easement that comes from the south end and ends at my driveway to the north. It is an overgrown acces... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-15 15:33 | Glassman | I went ahead and changed it from a power line to a track. I also renamed Seaview Drive NW to Northwest Seaview Drive to match what the county has. Let me know if that is wrong. | |
| 167598644 by Sydney Dick @ 2025-06-14 04:38 | 1 | 2025-06-14 19:37 | Glassman | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q". Also, if you are interested in getting more fancy, you can add the interior court to the school. Just draw an outline of the inner court, then select both the inner court and building outline. Then just right click and s... |
| 167544823 by M_A_Johnston @ 2025-06-12 17:52 | 1 | 2025-06-13 23:17 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.You added a duplicate building. Please delete the duplicate building and... |
| 167545591 by M_A_Johnston @ 2025-06-12 18:10 | 1 | 2025-06-13 23:16 | Glassman | This node is better than the duplicate building you added in your first edit. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167545591 |
| 167545886 by Callie Malone @ 2025-06-12 18:16 | 1 | 2025-06-13 23:14 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167545886 |
| 167544549 by Callie Malone @ 2025-06-12 17:46 | 1 | 2025-06-13 23:13 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.It appears you duplicated the costco store outline and added a river nex... |
| 167350864 by tohaomg @ 2025-06-08 13:04 | 1 | 2025-06-10 20:14 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.I have reverted this edit for going against DWG Crimera edits policy dur... |
| 2 | 2025-06-10 20:15 | Glassman | If you want to add an historic boundary I suggest using OpenHistoricalMap.org. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167350864 | |
| 3 | 2025-06-10 20:43 | tohaomg ♦2 | Now relations 1754553 and 19161871 are absolutely identical, they have the same shape and the same koatuu and katotth identifiers and that is not right | |
| 4 | 2025-06-11 00:05 | Glassman | Thanks for the information. I have removed relation 19161871 | |
| 5 | 2025-06-11 04:24 | tohaomg ♦2 | Looks like you have removed a section of the shape rather than the relation itself | |
| 6 | 2025-06-12 20:46 | Glassman | I believe I have corrected the problem | |
| 167509868 by Matty_22 @ 2025-06-11 21:34 | 1 | 2025-06-12 17:41 | Glassman | Can you also add the type of business Convenant Art Glass is? Is it a shop=art or craft-glassblower? Let me know if you need help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167509868 |
| 2 | 2025-06-12 18:46 | Matty_22 ♦1 | Add a tag shop=craft. Hopefully that looks right? It's a store that sells stained glass supplies. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-12 20:46 | Glassman | That sounds good. (From my username, you can probably guess I love having glass art shops added) | |
| 167542167 by gber62 @ 2025-06-12 16:51 | 1 | 2025-06-12 17:52 | Glassman | Is the sidewalk removed on the south side of the street service road? Imagery still shows it there but I see the construction of a new bike lane in the area. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167542167 |
| 167505711 by Enji Cooper @ 2025-06-11 19:12 | 1 | 2025-06-12 17:38 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167505711 |
| 167500105 by agerrish @ 2025-06-11 16:39 | 1 | 2025-06-12 17:37 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.Thanks for adding the new development --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167500105 |
| 167404354 by Jachy @ 2025-06-09 15:18 | 1 | 2025-06-11 16:18 | Glassman | The county shows the road as a service road. Can you review this edit? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167404354 |
| 2 | 2025-06-11 17:25 | Jachy ♦2 | Could you kindly point to the county data you're using? I looked at the Metro Transportation Network in King County for Car Mode GIS data. For this road (object id 8781, tlink_id 29654) it just labels it as an Unnamed road, with KC_FCC_ID of L which is a Local Arterial classification. The CFCC_... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-11 20:04 | Glassman | King County iMap does not show a residential road at this location. Looking at Bing street imagery, there is no street sign. https://www.bing.com/maps?FORM=Z9LH2&cp=47.621275%7E-122.161731&lvl=19.8&pi=-11.6&style=x&dir=205.7All of which looks like a shared driveway, which we ... | |
| 4 | 2025-06-12 09:04 | Jachy ♦2 | Thanks for the tagging tip. Shared driveway is basically accurate as it's shared by the 4 houses, I made a new edit changing it to highway=service + service=driveway | |
| 167465000 by Fl1pzomg @ 2025-06-10 21:41 | 1 | 2025-06-11 16:32 | Glassman | #TIP: Street names in OSM are spelled out. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167465000 |
| 167449711 by BryaE @ 2025-06-10 15:06 | 1 | 2025-06-11 16:29 | Glassman | Check out our wiki page on how to map straits. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dstrait. Using a node is preferred because the start and end of the strait is hard to determine. Also, I'm unable to find any reference to the Segastill Passage. Where did that name come from? I&... |
| 2 | 2025-06-29 05:03 | BryaE ♦1 | Re: Historical name from a local mariner. Inspired me to make my first OSM contribution | |
| 3 | 2025-06-29 05:04 | BryaE ♦1 | Re: Historical name from a local mariner. Inspired me to make my first OSM contribution | |
| 167405489 by Jachy @ 2025-06-09 15:40 | 1 | 2025-06-11 16:19 | Glassman | It appears the houses already are tagged with their address. The address tags were added to the building outline. Can you remove the duplicate addresses? Let me know if you need help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167405489 ... |
| 2 | 2025-06-12 09:07 | Jachy ♦2 | Thanks for catching this. I saw the address tags and they autopopulated when clicking them. I removed the duplicates in a subsequent change. | |
| 167443527 by MapperGL @ 2025-06-10 12:56 | 1 | 2025-06-10 21:03 | Glassman | He observado que estás eliminando áreas y luego volviéndolas a añadir con geometrías ligeramente diferentes. En lugar de hacer eso, simplemente modifica la geometría para guardar el historial del objeto.(in English)I noticed that you are removing areas... |
| 167410890 by clay_c @ 2025-06-09 17:40 | 1 | 2025-06-09 23:58 | Glassman | The wiki discourages the user of railway=facility. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Arailway%3Dfacility. Can you change this back or let me know why you think facility is more appropriate? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... |
| 2 | 2025-06-10 16:37 | clay_c ♦489 | Hi, Clifford. I hadn't heard about this tag being deprecated. I had been using railway=facility for years, not for any real semantic purposes, but to discourage other mappers from using another invalid value of railway=*, in this case railway=station. A public_transport=stop_area relation shoul... | |
| 167336358 by Golden beagle @ 2025-06-08 06:33 | 1 | 2025-06-08 22:01 | Glassman | #TIP: Your contribution looks good, but the flock device node should not be connected to the parking lot polygon. Can you disconnect it from the parking lot? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167336358 |
| 167293285 by bikeshj @ 2025-06-07 04:43 | 1 | 2025-06-07 23:10 | Glassman | It looks like you didn't connect your new path to the track it crosses. that connections is important for routers to work. Can you connect the path and the track. Let me know if you need help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1672... |
| 167329339 by bikeshj @ 2025-06-07 22:07 | 1 | 2025-06-07 23:09 | Glassman | #TIP: try not to connect paths and highways to boundaries or landuse. I went ahead and connect the path you added to the track and disconnected the path from the boundary. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167329339 |
| 167204672 by Ben4rd22 @ 2025-06-05 05:13 | 1 | 2025-06-06 02:37 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167204672 |
| 167192411 by btajuddin @ 2025-06-04 18:47 | 1 | 2025-06-06 02:36 | Glassman | #TIP: The gate is usually placed as a node on the driveway to tell the routers there is a gate there. Can you review this edit and fix as needed? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167192411 |
| 167153171 by musername @ 2025-06-03 21:22 | 1 | 2025-06-04 23:23 | Glassman | #TIP: It is good to leave the address on the node since it will likely be reused when a new business opens up. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167153171 |
| 167138886 by Jackson P Howard @ 2025-06-03 14:36 | 1 | 2025-06-04 23:20 | Glassman | #TIP: tag swimming pools as leisure=swimming_pool + access=private if not open to the public. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167138886 |
| 167119317 by nilloc29 @ 2025-06-03 06:41 | 1 | 2025-06-03 18:48 | Glassman | Thanks for updating all of those roads in Lewis county. Can you review this edit? A long segment of the Forest Road 4715 is tagged as a bridge instead of the short section of bridge you added. Let me know if you need help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://o... |
| 2 | 2025-06-03 18:48 | Glassman | Thanks for updating all of those roads in Lewis county. Can you review this edit? A long segment of the Forest Road 4715 is tagged as a bridge instead of the short section of bridge you added. Let me know if you need help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://o... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-04 01:49 | nilloc29 ♦1 | I think I was able to undo it. There are a quite a few missing bridges on the forest. I am not that interested in trying to add them all but someone ought to eventually. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-04 01:53 | nilloc29 ♦1 | Should I add notes for them when I notice them missing? I am not really sure how this is supposed to work. I see myself as a groundtruther but don't have a huge interest in figuring out all the quirks involved with editing | |
| 5 | 2025-06-04 18:54 | Glassman | Notes would be very helpful. It does take a few steps in our browser editor, iD, to add a bridge.We do have a more advanced editor, JOSM, that makes adding bridges and culverts very simple. Also, under the editors image icon, you can select LIDAR which does help identifying bridges someone eas... | |
| 167153179 by Glassman @ 2025-06-03 21:23 | 1 | 2025-06-03 22:30 | Mazda05 ♦534 | Greatings. What is the reason for this reverting? What is the editing conflict? I don't observe a single comment https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166614563 + https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166616744. How is this consistent with the DWG resolution https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/W... |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 00:45 | Mazda05 ♦534 | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/districts-in-crimea/130964. I ask you to cancel this rollback as soon as possible, as well as henceforth carefully deal with complaints sent to DWG. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-04 18:47 | Glassman | As the block on your account says, please follow the DWG guidelines for edits in Crimea. Looking at your tags, let me suggest that you add them to openhistoricalmap.org. If you are interested in OHM, I can connect you with one of the founders. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-05 03:39 | Mazda05 ♦534 | As the post says, boundary=historic have been retained as the new districts were formed based on the boundaries of the old ones, and the old boundaries have been changed since 2014 and need to be rechecked against the cadastre when it is opened. What does openhistoricalmap.org have to do with this? | |
| 5 | 2025-06-05 05:13 | Mazda05 ♦534 | All changes were made strictly in accordance with https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes/DWG_2014-06-05_Special_Crimea. Which was communicated to you and detailed as much as possible in the topic. I have not received any specifics from you regarding this. If you have any remarks, pleas... | |
| 167116387 by kulshan_25 @ 2025-06-03 04:50 | 1 | 2025-06-03 18:49 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167116387 |
| 167101732 by quincylvania @ 2025-06-02 17:12 | 1 | 2025-06-02 18:18 | Glassman | What does highest_point=2 refer to? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167101732 |
| 2 | 2025-06-02 18:32 | quincylvania ♦53 | Hi Glassman, this is a new tag I'm experimenting with. It means that this peak is the highest point within a country (admin_level=2). This is a similar pattern to capital=2. Maps sometimes want to prominently show the "highest points" of states and countries regardless of their elevat... | |
| 166950425 by HackBug @ 2025-05-30 03:50 | 1 | 2025-06-01 03:53 | pwbriggs ♦38 | Thanks for the contribution!Your usage of `house=terraced` looks good to me.One thing I would note is that we generally try to "preserve the history" of objects by *changing* them rather than deleting & creating new objects. In this example, you've deleted the original `bu... |
| 2 | 2025-06-01 17:33 | Glassman | addr:unit is needed when multiple addresses have the same addr:housenumber as these do. Typically most condo and many retail and commercial buildings host multiple businesses. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-02 03:23 | pwbriggs ♦38 | Okay, thanks for confirming. Looks like you're good to continue mapping these buildings @HackBug! Thanks! | |
| 4 | 2025-06-02 03:25 | HackBug ♦1 | Thanks all, I'm going to do some scouting tomorrow and make sure I have the unit numbers right. I'll try to make sure not to delete the old object next time. :) | |
| 5 | 2025-06-02 05:04 | pwbriggs ♦38 | Sounds good, thanks! And don't worry too much about preserving the old object if you accidentally delete it-- it's not that big a deal.Happy mapping! | |
| 166990216 by JimGKitsap @ 2025-05-30 20:55 | 1 | 2025-05-31 17:27 | Glassman | #TIP: The building outline should match the roof. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166990216 |
| 166990159 by JimGKitsap @ 2025-05-30 20:53 | 1 | 2025-05-31 17:26 | Glassman | #TIP: Address nodes typically either go near the main building or as part of the building outline. I see you added a building in a subsequent edit. Can you move the address to the building?#TIP: Instead of deleting a feature, just modify the geometry instead. --- ... |
| 166946939 by oconor @ 2025-05-29 23:55 | 1 | 2025-05-30 23:14 | Glassman | #TIP: you might also want to add the unit number since it appears that a number of businesses occupy the building --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166946939 |
| 166939199 by Nomo45 @ 2025-05-29 19:12 | 1 | 2025-05-30 23:07 | Glassman | It looks like you mapped some of the footpaths through the building. If they go into the building, we typically just take the path to the door and mark a building entrance. If the paths go under a cover, then the covered tagged would be appropriate. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covere... |
| 166937203 by Nomo45 @ 2025-05-29 18:21 | 1 | 2025-05-30 23:02 | Glassman | FYI - you might be seeing a shift in the imagery also. In the editor, click on the background icon, then towards the bottom of the list, there is imagery offset. You can adjust the imagery to better match what is already mapped. --- Published using OSMCha: htt... |
| 166844293 by aprime95 @ 2025-05-27 21:10 | 1 | 2025-05-28 18:59 | Glassman | Is this a parking lot, if so it probably should be tagged like the parking lots here -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166844293#map=19/45.909898/-122.747472. The reason for adding the service road is to allow the routers to direct the user right to the building. --- ... |
| 166843689 by Duboree @ 2025-05-27 20:50 | 1 | 2025-05-28 18:54 | Glassman | #TIP: it is good to also add a tag describing the type of business. My guess would be industrial=seafood_processing --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166843689 |
| 166843310 by Duboree @ 2025-05-27 20:35 | 1 | 2025-05-28 18:49 | Glassman | Residential roads in rural areas are typically tagged as highway=unclassified. OSM use the British road classification system since OSM was started in England. So basically, rural residential roads are classified as unclassified. You will see many wrongly classified rural roads because when the data... |
| 166843140 by Duboree @ 2025-05-27 20:30 | 1 | 2025-05-28 18:46 | Glassman | #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is software has a hard with abbreviated words --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166843140 |
| 166806987 by Ham738 @ 2025-05-27 05:48 | 1 | 2025-05-27 21:16 | Glassman | I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish. Let me know if you need help. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166806987 |
| 166797656 by Daveed R @ 2025-05-26 20:45 | 1 | 2025-05-27 21:12 | Glassman | #TIP: instead of deleting the service road, just modify the geometry which will save the history of the object. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166797656 |
| 166706875 by MAggar @ 2025-05-24 17:27 | 1 | 2025-05-25 19:53 | Glassman | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names. Since the house already has an address, adding a node with the same address doesn't really help. You could add a driveway from the street to the house. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/16... |
| 166705905 by brady gustafson @ 2025-05-24 16:57 | 1 | 2025-05-25 19:51 | Glassman | #TIP: we spell out street names in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time with abbreviations --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166705905 |
| 166705601 by Dr-Bike @ 2025-05-24 16:48 | 1 | 2025-05-25 19:50 | Glassman | If this is a cycleway, how do people get to their garage? I think you want highway=service + bicycle=yes + motor_vehicle=yes. Please review this edit. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... |
| 166674380 by DylanZintz @ 2025-05-23 21:14 | 1 | 2025-05-24 20:21 | Glassman | Could the detention structure be more like a dike than an dam? Also, when removing a business, it is better to adjust the geometry as needed so the address and history of the object is saved. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166674... |
| 166618649 by AnthonyPc541 @ 2025-05-22 15:26 | 1 | 2025-05-23 17:56 | Glassman | Do you realize that you are inviting people to this address 24 hours a day, 7 days a week? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166618649 |
| 166633771 by kjsfdhvk @ 2025-05-23 00:33 | 1 | 2025-05-23 02:19 | Glassman | Thanks for fixing the tag |
| 166582794 by kjsfdhvk @ 2025-05-21 18:58 | 1 | 2025-05-22 18:18 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166582794 |
| 2 | 2025-05-22 18:19 | Glassman | I'm a bit confused. The brand was changed to Coca-Cola but the tag not:brand:wikidata\tQ2813 implies it is not the official coke brand. Is that true? --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166582794 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 00:34 | kjsfdhvk ♦1 | Good catch. I guess the ID editor did that automatically, maybe I didn't set the name properly. I have updated it to remove the "not:" from the property name. | |
| 165769441 by brightly one @ 2025-05-03 17:11 | 1 | 2025-05-04 23:28 | Glassman | I have reverted this changeset. The road exists on the counties iMap server. See https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/As I said in a previous changeset of yours, just because the feature is on private property it can be added to OSM. In this case, it is a public road. If you disagree, please leav... |
| 2 | 2025-05-20 16:58 | brightly one ♦1 | King County IMap has just been updated to reflect the correct extents of the Anthony Pl. S. right-of-way. Would you mind reviewing my original change request relative to the current KC GIS IMap to confirm? link same as above:https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/imap/Thank you!! | |
| 3 | 2025-05-20 17:35 | Glassman | Thanks for the info. I updated OSM to reflect what you originally mapped. Let me know if you see any errors. | |
| 4 | 2025-05-20 21:21 | brightly one ♦1 | The update on OSM is still not correct. The path shown running east/west is not a ROW (it is private easement, that is not open to the public) so is shown incorrectly. This version does not match the current version of King County IMap.I emailed a mark up of this current OSM as a PDF, since I... | |
| 5 | 2025-05-20 21:34 | Glassman | Can you tell me what part is wrong from this screen shot https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/5SL6YPsDR8fHfD3 | |
| 6 | 2025-05-20 21:44 | brightly one ♦1 | Is there a way to send you an image or pdf? I have marked up the screenshot but am unable to upload here. | |
| 7 | 2025-05-20 21:46 | brightly one ♦1 | I have added four 'notes' to the OSM: two indicate where OSM is correct, and two indicate where OSM is incorrect. Are you able to read those notes? Thanks for your help! | |
| 8 | 2025-05-20 22:09 | Glassman | So if understand your notes, Anthony Pl S does not connect to the new constructions and Anthony Pl S is private property. Private roads can be tagged as ownership=private. If there is signage for no trespassing or similar, then the tag access=private.I'm curious, how do workers get to the... | |
| 9 | 2025-05-21 17:16 | brightly one ♦1 | Anthony Pl S is a public ROW.. it connects to 27th Ave S, and happens to be platted on a diagonal relative to 27th Ave S, the alley, Cheasty Blvd. but it is a straight line, and terminates exactly where OSM shows it terminating. It provides access to 3515 and 3517 Anthony Pl. S.. 3523 & 3... | |
| 10 | 2025-05-21 17:18 | brightly one ♦1 | Construction workers access 3517 by parking on that paved segment of Anthony Pl S. (that connects to 27th Ave S,) then they walk 100-ft west to front door of 3517. | |
| 166498595 by Ranger Kel @ 2025-05-19 22:13 | 1 | 2025-05-19 23:36 | Glassman | #TIP: connect the footway to a road to allow multimodal routing. I went ahead and made the change to give an example. |
| 2 | 2025-05-20 23:19 | Ranger Kel ♦4 | cool thank you! | |
| 166456396 by Dean_Clifton55 @ 2025-05-19 05:00 | 1 | 2025-05-19 17:49 | Glassman | It looks like you acidentally dragged a node which someone else fixed. Please be careful --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166456396 |
| 166453261 by guy_grandpa5 @ 2025-05-19 01:37 | 1 | 2025-05-19 17:41 | Glassman | #TIP: square the buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q". Also please don't use descriptive names. It's okay to use the name of the company posted on the facility, but tags are sufficient for objects --- Published using OSMC... |
| 166455095 by guy_grandpa5 @ 2025-05-19 03:55 | 1 | 2025-05-19 17:39 | Glassman | #TIP: add the hashtag to the changeset comment. They really don't belong on a feature. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166455095 |
| 166453840 by guy_grandpa5 @ 2025-05-19 02:27 | 1 | 2025-05-19 17:36 | Glassman | Instead of using the name tag, use produce=apple --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166453840 |
| 166453745 by guy_grandpa5 @ 2025-05-19 02:19 | 1 | 2025-05-19 17:34 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166453745 |
| 166453653 by guy_grandpa5 @ 2025-05-19 02:12 | 1 | 2025-05-19 17:34 | Glassman | As mentioned before, we don't use descriptive names in OSM. Also, this looks more like farmland or a meadow. Please review this edit. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166453653 |
| 166357277 by Ranger Kel @ 2025-05-16 15:37 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:20 | Glassman | There was already a parking area where you added the parking node. Can you remove the node? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166357277 |
| 2 | 2025-05-17 22:21 | Glassman | Is the tree actually gone? it shows in the imagery? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166357277 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-17 22:46 | Ranger Kel ♦4 | Hello,I believe I added a dumpster and an info sign, not a parking node? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-17 22:49 | Ranger Kel ♦4 | I did not remove any tree? I removed a recycle bin as it does not exist. | |
| 5 | 2025-05-17 22:49 | Glassman | You are correct. The node and the parking lot polygon were so close I selected the wrong feature. Sorry about that. I take it from your user name you are the park ranger. Welcome to OSM. It's always nice to see the people responsible for the parks contribute to OSM. --- ... | |
| 6 | 2025-05-17 22:53 | Ranger Kel ♦4 | I see now I placed the garbage dumpster on the parking path. I relocated it so that it is no longer a parking node and it is more accurate location. | |
| 7 | 2025-05-17 22:56 | Ranger Kel ♦4 | Thank you! I am new to OSM, but am trying to map our park features as accurately as possible :)I will be adding more as I can verify their exact locations. | |
| 8 | 2025-05-18 00:06 | Glassman | Check out https://osmcha.org/changesets/166357277 to see the tree that was removed. | |
| 166376317 by AJG9825 @ 2025-05-17 04:58 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:41 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166376317 |
| 166376262 by AJG9825 @ 2025-05-17 04:54 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:40 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166376262 |
| 166376147 by AJG9825 @ 2025-05-17 04:46 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:40 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166376147 |
| 166375859 by AJG9825 @ 2025-05-17 04:28 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:39 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375859 |
| 166375785 by AJG9825 @ 2025-05-17 04:22 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:39 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375785 |
| 166375677 by AJG9825 @ 2025-05-17 04:13 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:39 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375677 |
| 166375476 by AJG9825 @ 2025-05-17 03:56 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:39 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375476 |
| 166375371 by AJG9825 @ 2025-05-17 03:48 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:38 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.It wouldn't hurt to also add the tag, access=private. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375371 |
| 166375927 by DavyYoung @ 2025-05-17 04:32 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:37 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Much nicer than your previous house. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375927 |
| 166375883 by DavyYoung @ 2025-05-17 04:29 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:37 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375883 |
| 166375839 by DavyYoung @ 2025-05-17 04:26 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:36 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375839 |
| 166375798 by DavyYoung @ 2025-05-17 04:23 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:36 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375798 |
| 166375737 by DavyYoung @ 2025-05-17 04:18 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:36 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375737 |
| 166375608 by DavyYoung @ 2025-05-17 04:08 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:36 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375608 |
| 166375357 by DavyYoung @ 2025-05-17 03:47 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:35 | Glassman | It is a good idea to add a tag with the type of business. Can you add one for the body shop? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375357 |
| 166375279 by DavyYoung @ 2025-05-17 03:40 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:35 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375279 |
| 166375205 by DavyYoung @ 2025-05-17 03:32 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:34 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375205 |
| 166372473 by lcrutcher @ 2025-05-16 23:31 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:33 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Though sheds usually don't have an address. If there isn't a main address for the property, I'd add one to the main house or business. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSM... |
| 166359914 by Reannan C @ 2025-05-16 16:38 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:29 | Glassman | Can you also add a tag with the type of business this is as well as Dry Box in your first edit? Thanks --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166359914 |
| 166356685 by Ranger Kel @ 2025-05-16 15:22 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:26 | Glassman | I don't see any mention of a garden on the parks website. Can you confirm it exists? I'll send you more info on the park in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166356685 |
| 2 | 2025-05-17 22:47 | Ranger Kel ♦4 | Hello,The garden does exist. I am a parks employee. We have created a separate website for the garden but have not yet published it. When the parks website is redesigned, we will place a link to to the native plant garden website. | |
| 166331779 by Ellie Kroner @ 2025-05-16 05:22 | 1 | 2025-05-16 20:09 | Glassman | I don't really understand the purpose of the pedestrian area since it looks like there are two leisure areas inside of it. Check this area out on UW campus in Seattle for some tips https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/47.653879/-122.308065 Let me know if you need help --- ... |
| 166329578 by Araceli Esquivel @ 2025-05-16 03:11 | 1 | 2025-05-16 20:03 | Glassman | I removed the duplicate building. There was already a tag for Akins and a node --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166329578 |
| 166329396 by Araceli Esquivel @ 2025-05-16 03:02 | 1 | 2025-05-16 20:02 | Glassman | I went ahead and removed the duplicate buildings and unneeded multipolygons. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166329396 |
| 166329229 by Araceli Esquivel @ 2025-05-16 02:50 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:56 | Glassman | When a business operates inside of a building with multiple businesses, just add a node for the business. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours on how to add opening hours. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166329229... |
| 166329118 by ClarelR @ 2025-05-16 02:44 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:54 | Glassman | The tree row, looks just like a bunch of trees which could be tagged as natural=wood, with inner polygons where there are no trees. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166329118 |
| 166328192 by ClarelR @ 2025-05-16 01:44 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:52 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166328192 |
| 166328093 by ClarelR @ 2025-05-16 01:34 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:52 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166328093 |
| 166328142 by aulinwalker @ 2025-05-16 01:38 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:50 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166328142 |
| 166327919 by aulinwalker @ 2025-05-16 01:21 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:50 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166327919 |
| 166327486 by aulinwalker @ 2025-05-16 00:44 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:49 | Glassman | The out door seatting looks like it has a roof so you could also add the tag, building=shelter. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166327486 |
| 166325404 by Rachel_Scott @ 2025-05-15 22:11 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:47 | Glassman | #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166325404 |
| 166325314 by Rachel_Scott @ 2025-05-15 22:06 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:46 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166325314 |
| 166325007 by Rachel_Scott @ 2025-05-15 21:53 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:46 | Glassman | I probably would have tagged the building as retail since it has a retail like business --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166325007 |
| 166324728 by Rachel_Scott @ 2025-05-15 21:41 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:45 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166324728 |
| 166323340 by Rachel_Scott @ 2025-05-15 20:44 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:45 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166323340 |
| 166322986 by Rachel_Scott @ 2025-05-15 20:32 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:44 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166322986 |
| 166325402 by Churpin @ 2025-05-15 22:11 | 1 | 2025-05-16 19:43 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.I would recommend merging the shop node with the building outline since they seem to be business run in the building. The rest of your edits look good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published usin... |
| 166232316 by Grace :O @ 2025-05-14 03:07 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:49 | Glassman | While a cliff can be tag with a node, they are more often tag as a way. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcliff for more information on natural=cliff. Also, instead of adding the tag hashtags=#cwugeog to the feature, just start your changeset comment with #cwugeog plus the br... |
| 166176219 by Mr Clowns @ 2025-05-12 23:01 | 1 | 2025-05-13 07:12 | pwbriggs ♦38 | Confirmed based on Bing Streetside imagery. Thanks for the contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 16:43 | Glassman | As pwbriggs said, thanks for correcting the street name. Could you also rename the bridge over the creek also? The county's imap isn't very specific as to where the name changes to 132nd Avenue Southeast. Can you verify where it changes? --- Publishe... | |
| 166222836 by Lenonn84 @ 2025-05-13 20:25 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:32 | Glassman | We don't use descriptive names in OSM. Just tag it as building=house is sufficient. Can you remove the names from the houses? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166222836 |
| 166163758 by Lenonn84 @ 2025-05-12 17:22 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:29 | Glassman | The concrete way around the parking looks more like highway=footway + footway=sidewalk instead of highway=path. A path is what we in the US often call a trail. Can you review this edit? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166163758 ... |
| 166154891 by Lennon84 @ 2025-05-12 14:09 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:26 | Glassman | I noticed you corrected the number of units. Are these connected buildings with a number of units or individual buildings. I can't tell from the imagery. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166154891 |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 18:11 | Allison P ♦1,136 | building=terrace and building:part=house for individual units would be more appropriate here since the units aren't stacked | |
| 166227960 by MulhollandWildcatCWU @ 2025-05-13 23:40 | 1 | 2025-05-14 02:06 | Glassman | It looks like you accidentally dragged some nodes of trails and the Heart Lake Road. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166227960#map=19/48.457497/-122.634886.I also disconnected the park boundary from the Heart Lake Road. Having them not connected helps others make edits to one of the ... |
| 166130534 by CatziiztaC @ 2025-05-12 01:45 | 1 | 2025-05-12 19:07 | Glassman | #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166130534 |
| 166125990 by John Borwick @ 2025-05-11 20:47 | 1 | 2025-05-12 19:04 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166125990 |
| 166086723 by MulhollandWildcatCWU @ 2025-05-10 21:22 | 1 | 2025-05-12 00:19 | Glassman | Check out Skagit iMap for a better boundary for the park. https://www.skagitcounty.net/Maps/iMap/ --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166086723 |
| 166078903 by MulhollandWildcatCWU @ 2025-05-10 17:16 | 1 | 2025-05-12 00:07 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166078903 |
| 166050454 by BainbridgeBoyd @ 2025-05-10 01:04 | 1 | 2025-05-10 20:02 | Glassman | It looks like you deleted an address node. It's a good idea to leave the address node for future businesses. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166050454 |
| 2 | 2025-05-11 04:31 | BainbridgeBoyd ♦1 | It previously was run as three businesses from one location. Now there are two which are set correctly | |
| 3 | 2025-05-11 20:33 | Glassman | I only see one business with that address. | |
| 166087149 by MulhollandWildcatCWU @ 2025-05-10 21:42 | 1 | 2025-05-11 16:56 | Glassman | Please use a brief description of your edit instead of added hashtag... Also, landuse=forest implies that the area is logged. A better tag is natural=wood. That describes what is there and leave open to it be just a wooded area and that someone could add the landuse=forest if the area is logged. ... |
| 166087064 by MulhollandWildcatCWU @ 2025-05-10 21:38 | 1 | 2025-05-11 16:52 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.Why are you removing addresses from businesses? --- ... |
| 166050362 by BainbridgeBoyd @ 2025-05-10 00:56 | 1 | 2025-05-10 20:00 | Glassman | It looks like you added a park that is already mapped in OSM, but with a different boundary. Can you determine which boundary is correct and remove the wrong one? Let me know if you need help --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166050362\... |
| 166049300 by gtb1962 @ 2025-05-09 23:27 | 1 | 2025-05-10 19:57 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166049300 |
| 165967229 by Dave in Cheney @ 2025-05-08 06:25 | 1 | 2025-05-08 17:10 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165967229 |
| 165968539 by Dave in Cheney @ 2025-05-08 07:13 | 1 | 2025-05-08 17:06 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165968539 |
| 165967445 by Dave in Cheney @ 2025-05-08 06:33 | 1 | 2025-05-08 17:06 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165967445 |
| 165967283 by Dave in Cheney @ 2025-05-08 06:27 | 1 | 2025-05-08 17:05 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165967283 |
| 165914558 by oscarlewis @ 2025-05-06 23:24 | 1 | 2025-05-07 18:13 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165914558 |
| 165912913 by oscarlewis @ 2025-05-06 21:52 | 1 | 2025-05-07 18:12 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165912913 |
| 165912507 by oscarlewis @ 2025-05-06 21:33 | 1 | 2025-05-07 18:11 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165912507 |
| 165089410 by sheldonelectric @ 2025-04-17 21:18 | 1 | 2025-05-06 21:36 | Glassman | Can you explain why you deleted valid foreign names at Thessaloniki railway station, despite the name “Thessaloniki” being widely translated? Thanks DWG --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165089410 |
| 2 | 2025-05-09 10:57 | sheldonelectric ♦178 | Hallo Glassman, thank you for your message. The entire changeset is based on data from the official website of hellenictrain.gr The int_name=Epivatikos Stathmos was wrong and I corrected it to int_name=Thesssaloniki, the name:xx are not in wikipedia and therefore deleted. It was consensed by the gre... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-09 11:12 | sheldonelectric ♦178 | I have just added the name:xx in every language I found on wikipedia. | |
| 165817442 by JMRosenfeld @ 2025-05-04 20:03 | 1 | 2025-05-04 23:20 | Glassman | The path exists on imagery. Why was it removed? Note - even though the property is privately owned, we can document features that exist there. You can add the tag ownership=private as well as access=private if the footway has no trespassing signage. --- Publis... |
| 2 | 2025-05-05 01:54 | JMRosenfeld ♦2 | Yes, the path is there, but it is on private property. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-05 20:39 | Glassman | Check out the wiki page on removing roads on private property. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property. While the wiki page talks about roads, the same argument can me made for sidewalks and paths. Please add the ways back. | |
| 165817313 by JMRosenfeld @ 2025-05-04 19:59 | 1 | 2025-05-04 23:18 | Glassman | Question - your changeset comment said this is a private residence yet the edit removed a path. Why did you remove the path? Does it not exist? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165817313 |
| 2 | 2025-05-05 01:53 | JMRosenfeld ♦2 | Apologies for removing. The path does exist. But it is not on the public right of way. | |
| 165777176 by Flap Slimy Outward @ 2025-05-03 21:03 | 1 | 2025-05-04 20:57 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.It looks like you dragged to nodes. I have fixed them. Also, when indivi... |
| 165492965 by Ziggity @ 2025-04-27 07:41 | 1 | 2025-04-27 16:39 | Glassman | It appears you removed some of the crossings:markings tags. Was this on purpose or an accident? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165492965 |
| 2 | 2025-04-27 16:52 | Ziggity ♦1 | I believe this was related to railroad crossings? The tags were by there lonesome on a node that didn’t cross. I moved them to the appropriate crossing node as required by OSM wiki. I followed the wiki specifics that said they were required to be on the crossing. Hopefully that helps? | |
| 3 | 2025-04-28 02:25 | Glassman | Help me understand why you replaced crossing=marked with crossing=traffic_signals? It is wrong. Unless you can convenience me that your change is correct, my only real alternative is to revert all of your changeset that made this change. I do see come good additions, but changing the crossing tag is... | |
| 4 | 2025-04-28 02:42 | Glassman | Check out the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dtraffic_signals. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165492965 | |
| 5 | 2025-04-28 04:25 | Ziggity ♦1 | I so wish I could talk to you via voice as this is a big one I’ve been interested in for years now. That wiki Is exactly what I used. So here’s my thoughts… All pedestrian push button crossings in the USA follow this and the reason for marking this is two-fold. So pushing the bu... | |
| 6 | 2025-04-28 04:37 | Ziggity ♦1 | Oops, I said one minute for each crossing but I can’t remember the exact time. It’s somewhere in my notes but I don’t have it accessible now. There might be an example posted in this beast of an article: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/26518/chapter/8#96 | |
| 7 | 2025-04-28 12:28 | Ziggity ♦1 | Also if I was wrong (I’m thinking now maybe I was as I look more at the other wiki pages), I will gladly go around and fix this. I’m not alone on this error and this error existed already in some crossings here. WOW, if this is what I’m now thinking it is, then I’ve never see... | |
| 8 | 2025-04-28 13:16 | Ziggity ♦1 | Okay based on this page now I don’t think I was wrong… but I do think OSM needs to clarify what the correct answer is:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing | |
| 9 | 2025-04-29 01:44 | Ziggity ♦1 | Here’s another page that seems (?) to say what I did is okay (at least not wrong): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing | |
| 10 | 2025-05-02 19:56 | Glassman | After reviewing what you posted, I have to agree with you that what you did was correct. I do think that the the tag crossing:markings=* should be added as suggested by the wiki page you referenced. I'm going to update the crossings as I have time. Feel free to jump in. And in the future, p... | |
| 11 | 2025-05-03 00:48 | Ziggity ♦1 | Awesome! I updated a bunch of crossings as recommended. I also keep finding crossings that aren’t attached and crossing nodes that aren’t at the crossing. So I’m fixing those too. There are some map helping aids that will help find those but I’m not currently using those. I g... | |
| 165651593 by MichaelBirawer @ 2025-04-30 20:46 | 1 | 2025-05-02 02:36 | Glassman | The two nodes in Seattle almost look the same. You could just add both shop and gallery to one tag. It would also help your SEO score to add your website. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165651593 |
| 165478859 by rajataggarwal91 @ 2025-04-26 18:42 | 1 | 2025-04-29 00:14 | Glassman | Why did you remove the cuisine=coffee_shop from Cherry Street Coffee House? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165478859 |
| 165385675 by SeenBee @ 2025-04-24 15:39 | 1 | 2025-04-25 23:56 | Glassman | Question about the ALPR device and post office blue box. Is the ALPR actually mounted on top of the post office box? If not they should be two separate nodes. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chan... |
| 2 | 2025-04-25 23:56 | Glassman | Question about the ALPR device and post office blue box. Is the ALPR actually mounted on top of the post office box? If not they should be two separate nodes. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chan... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-27 18:50 | SeenBee ♦2 | These are two separate locations/nodes. It shows two nodes below so is this incorrect? 12783765563. and ...64. 1st post so still learning. | |
| 4 | 2025-04-28 02:33 | Glassman | node/12783765563 has both a blue box and an ALRP device. From the shadow, it does appear that there is something up a ways. If both exist, then there should likely be two different nodes, probably close together. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/... | |
| 165497197 by Andres Valdes @ 2025-04-27 09:38 | 1 | 2025-04-27 09:40 | Andres Valdes ♦1 | How can I delete this? I didn't mean to publish it. |
| 2 | 2025-04-27 20:54 | Glassman | Reverted. OSM is a live database. We do have a dev server. Let me know if you need more info on it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165497197 | |
| 165436901 by Simon Barlow @ 2025-04-25 18:08 | 1 | 2025-04-26 16:43 | Glassman | #TIP: descriptive names are not used in OSM. Just tag the feature appropriately. Only add a name if the features has a signed name. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165436901 |
| 165436519 by Simon Barlow @ 2025-04-25 17:58 | 1 | 2025-04-26 16:42 | Glassman | It looks like you acidentially dragged a curb ramp node. I fixed it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165436519 |
| 165386570 by SeenBee @ 2025-04-24 15:58 | 1 | 2025-04-25 23:55 | Glassman | diameter is an alternative for circumference which is a measurement of the trunk at 1.3 meters up from the ground. It's also in meters if no unit is given. Can you review these two trees to fix the values. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree for tagging trees. ... |
| 165280579 by Stefan Haeder @ 2025-04-22 11:33 Active block | 1 | 2025-04-22 14:56 | silversurfer83 ♦3,388 | Hallo Stefan,laut deinen Angaben hast du Google Earth genutzt um Änderungen an der Datenbank OpenStreetMap durchzuführen. Wir dürfen *keine* Googleprodukte als Quelle für unsere Arbeit hier nutzen. Bitte lass das umgehend sein und verwende nur Quellen, die eine passende Lizen... |
| 2 | 2025-04-22 21:56 | Glassman | Reverted for using google as a source. See changeset 165305736 | |
| 165172601 by spomap @ 2025-04-19 22:11 | 1 | 2025-04-20 20:06 | Glassman | #TIP: include the tag addr:city= when adding an address. While we are a geospatial system, it just nice to include the city. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165172601 |
| 165075649 by CalicoCritters28 @ 2025-04-17 14:38 | 1 | 2025-04-18 20:05 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.Some of the buildings are poorly outlined. Please redo them to better ma... |
| 165075511 by AcidChair @ 2025-04-17 14:35 | 1 | 2025-04-18 20:04 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165075511 |
| 165074911 by Danya Alqaisi @ 2025-04-17 14:22 | 1 | 2025-04-18 20:03 | Glassman | The building is not square. Please fix by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165074911 |
| 165048607 by Flying machine @ 2025-04-16 22:52 | 1 | 2025-04-18 00:14 | Glassman | You renamed the pub Old Stone Brewing Company now Brickersons. The website doesn't appear to have anything other than Old STone Brewing Company. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165048607 |
| 165035754 by Barkley Village @ 2025-04-16 16:00 | 1 | 2025-04-18 00:04 | Glassman | #TIP: OSM doesn't use descriptive names like Available. Showing the shop=vacant should be enough. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165035754 |
| 164880374 by Howie Ha @ 2025-04-13 06:17 | 1 | 2025-04-13 18:11 | Glassman | I looks like you added the same restaurant to two different nodes. I'd suggest just keeping the one the business uses as their address even though they may occupy both. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164880374 |
| 164835536 by KCRadioGuy @ 2025-04-11 22:20 | 1 | 2025-04-12 19:39 | Glassman | Why did you remove the driveway at the north end of Treemont Lane Northeast? It is on the imagery.Also you added a power line that connects two different roads. Power lines don't connect to roads. Please review this edit and make connections as needed. Let me know if you need help. ... |
| 2 | 2025-04-13 01:59 | KCRadioGuy ♦1 | A driveway is not a part of the street. Is there a utility roadway, the powerline is a dirt road for utility access and commonly gets used by locals when traffic issues arise. | |
| 3 | 2025-04-13 02:31 | Glassman | The driveway should be left. It's good for routing for friends and deliveries.Also, the dir road should be tagged highway=service and if you are energetic, surface=dirt. There is a mapped power line just to the east of where you did you work as an example of what they look like mapped.... | |
| 164773244 by not bounceking @ 2025-04-10 14:52 | 1 | 2025-04-12 00:17 | Glassman | #TIP: instead of deleting the existing outline, just modify it to better match the roof line. This saves the history of the object. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164773244 |
| 164772604 by a condition of the atmosphere in which the pressure is above average @ 2025-04-10 14:39 | 1 | 2025-04-10 16:20 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.The building outline should only include the roof line. Please redo th... |
| 164771778 by a condition of the atmosphere in which the pressure is above average @ 2025-04-10 14:22 | 1 | 2025-04-10 16:20 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.The building outline should only include the roof line. Please redo thes... |
| 163026957 by a condition of the atmosphere in which the pressure is above average @ 2025-02-27 19:58 | 1 | 2025-04-10 16:20 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.The building outline should only include the roof line. Please redo thes... |
| 164709196 by Anderson Law PLLC @ 2025-04-09 07:13 | 1 | 2025-04-09 07:15 | NeisBot ♦2,168 | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions co... |
| 2 | 2025-04-09 18:48 | allen4names ♦11 | This edit should be reverted. Clearwater between Edison and Kellogg no longer appears on the map. | |
| 3 | 2025-04-09 23:16 | Glassman | reverted - SEO Spam and poorly done --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164709196 | |
| 164613386 by zsjeff @ 2025-04-07 02:01 | 1 | 2025-04-07 18:26 | Glassman | It looks like you accidentally connected a track to a power line near bullfrog road. Can you fix it? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164613386 |
| 2 | 2025-04-08 23:00 | zsjeff ♦1 | I have disconnected the trail from the power line. One of my first edits on OSM, and I am now aware of the issue and will be more careful in the future. Thanks. | |
| 3 | 2025-04-09 00:16 | Glassman | Not problem. It's a very common error we all make. | |
| 164644492 by Aerostatic @ 2025-04-07 17:01 | 1 | 2025-04-08 19:19 | Glassman | #TIP: instead of deleting the address along with the building, use the down arrow to save the address. The address is likely going to be reused. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164644492 |
| 164644275 by Aerostatic @ 2025-04-07 16:56 | 1 | 2025-04-08 19:18 | Glassman | #TIP: square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164644275 |
| 2 | 2025-04-08 19:21 | Aerostatic ♦1 | oh super helpful, thank you! I'm still figuring it out :) | |
| 164613423 by zsjeff @ 2025-04-07 02:06 | 1 | 2025-04-07 18:31 | Glassman | Typically, we tag asphalt ways as highway=footway, Because OSM started in England we use British English terms. footways are similar to a sidewalk in the US.And since it is adjacent to a road, it's tagged as highway=footway + footway=sidewalk --- Publish... |
| 164515338 by Kellenblakeney @ 2025-04-04 15:29 | 1 | 2025-04-06 18:05 | Glassman | #TIP: use a brief descriptive changeset description like "added road"Also, instead of deleting an existing feature try to just change it's geometry. That saves the history of the feature. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/change... |
| 164514128 by Kellenblakeney @ 2025-04-04 15:07 | 1 | 2025-04-06 18:02 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164514128 |
| 164499551 by David Chandler @ 2025-04-04 09:47 | 1 | 2025-04-06 18:00 | Glassman | #TIP: the tag addr:street should be spelled out. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164499551 |
| 164484008 by Cassifer<3 @ 2025-04-03 21:32 | 1 | 2025-04-04 17:37 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.One suggestion, square the buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" to make the buildings look professionally done. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: h... |
| 164484114 by chsmapper29 @ 2025-04-03 21:37 | 1 | 2025-04-04 17:36 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164484114 |
| 164483809 by chsmapper29 @ 2025-04-03 21:24 | 1 | 2025-04-04 17:35 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164483809 |
| 164483736 by chsmapper29 @ 2025-04-03 21:20 | 1 | 2025-04-04 17:35 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.One suggestion, square the buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" to make them look professionally done. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://os... |
| 164483852 by WorldwideChaos @ 2025-04-03 21:26 | 1 | 2025-04-04 17:33 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.same request to square the buildings --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164483852 |
| 164483653 by WorldwideChaos @ 2025-04-03 21:17 | 1 | 2025-04-04 17:33 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.One suggestion, select the building outline then just type a "q" to square them so they look professionally done. Can you go back and fix these buildings? --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA P... |
| 164483845 by QuietKay37 @ 2025-04-03 21:25 | 1 | 2025-04-04 17:31 | Glassman | Square the buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164483845 |
| 164483613 by QuietKay37 @ 2025-04-03 21:15 | 1 | 2025-04-04 17:30 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.However, two buildings overlap. Also, when the imagery is taken from directly overhead, the roof line make it look the the building has points, but its actually a rectangle. Can you fix the overlap and roof line? --- ... |
| 164483891 by sunny572013 @ 2025-04-03 21:28 | 1 | 2025-04-04 17:25 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Don't forget square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164483891 |
| 164483690 by sunny572013 @ 2025-04-03 21:18 | 1 | 2025-04-04 17:24 | Glassman | I believe you want the tag natural=tree. natural=wood is usually a polygon around a number of trees. Can you fix these? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164483690 |
| 164509049 by Kri_ttt @ 2025-04-04 13:35 | 1 | 2025-04-04 14:42 | Glassman | I'm having trouble translating the name:th-Latn you added. Neither Google or Deepl give a useful translations. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164509049 |
| 164406682 by User24849293 @ 2025-04-02 07:46 | 1 | 2025-04-02 17:01 | Glassman | From imagery, it appears that pedestrian and bike access is allowable. A gate can be added as a node in the path at each end. Can you review this edits and corrected as needed? Let me know if you need help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/change... |
| 2 | 2025-04-02 23:26 | User24849293 ♦1 | The street view is 5+ years old. Sometime in the past year or so, the north end was completely fenced off by the electric utility with no trespassing signs (and I believe the south end is closed now too but would have to go look again). In any case, my main goal was to fix the inconsistency where th... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-02 23:32 | Glassman | Thanks for the update, I just wanted to make sure. | |
| 164434026 by boatlaw @ 2025-04-02 18:23 | 1 | 2025-04-02 19:24 | Glassman | deleted SEO spam for just changing the address. Before making more edits, please learn how to map in OSM. Feel free to contact me for help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164434026 |
| 164233434 by Justin Massena @ 2025-03-29 03:38 | 1 | 2025-03-30 00:44 | Glassman | A couple of suggestions. We don't use descriptive names. If it's not named then don't add a name. You changed the access from private to no. access=no is pretty strong. access=private is typically assumed for driveways. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access It also appea... |
| 164177954 by NoPosterGirl @ 2025-03-27 18:46 | 1 | 2025-03-28 22:49 | Glassman | Quick question. Does the Quick Silver Coffee shop still exist here? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177954 |
| 164129196 by essx @ 2025-03-26 16:15 | 1 | 2025-03-27 23:32 | Glassman | It looks like you accidentally connected the crossing to the power line instead of the sidewalk. I fixed it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164129196 |
| 164101319 by ptml @ 2025-03-26 00:12 | 1 | 2025-03-26 21:55 | Glassman | It looks you acidentally connected the new bldg to the power line. I went ahead and unconnected them. Also, bldgs looks so much nicer when squared. To square buildings, just select the outline and type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... |
| 163998080 by BTosch @ 2025-03-23 17:19 | 1 | 2025-03-25 00:21 | Glassman | According to county records this is not a named road. See https://kitcogis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8bcc146d9c2847acb2e9aa239187c25eI went ahead and changed it. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OS... |
| 2 | 2025-03-25 02:36 | BTosch ♦1 | It's on google maps and apple maps and has 4 legal addresses along it. If you look at the individual plats in the county GIS you will see the listed address is along the named 'Flying M Dr'. https://taxsifter.co.kittitas.wa.us/Search/results.aspx?q=963940 | |
| 3 | 2025-03-25 02:59 | Glassman | You are correct, the counties parcels show Flying M Drive as the streetname. That isn't unusual, they just assume a driveway access, often accompanied by a shared private service road. I'm very familiar with this concept. I've added thousands of addresses in Washington State. ... | |
| 163799416 by EWA_J-BOMS @ 2025-03-19 03:46 | 1 | 2025-03-20 02:25 | Glassman | #TIP: We normally add the fuel info to the roof over the pumps instead of the convenience store. Can you review this edit? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163799416 |
| 2 | 2025-03-20 02:33 | EWA_J-BOMS ♦1 | Sounds good! I updated it so the fuel types are on the roof instead of the convenience store. Thanks! | |
| 163741319 by PatrickEng @ 2025-03-17 16:57 | 1 | 2025-03-19 00:41 | Glassman | You might want to check out the wiki on how to add a slipway. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dslipway --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163741319 |
| 163765669 by N1n @ 2025-03-18 09:38 | 1 | 2025-03-18 15:50 | Glassman | Streets should only be split when there is a physical barrier between lanes. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriagewayCan you review this edit? Thanks --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163765669 |
| 163746800 by (Anonymous) @ 2025-03-17 19:13 | 1 | 2025-03-17 19:17 | NeisBot ♦2,168 | Hi EditWatcher, welcome to OSM!Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:- 9 highway(s)Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mist... |
| 2 | 2025-03-17 22:42 | Glassman | Please explain why you removed these roads. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163746800 | |
| 3 | 2025-03-18 00:04 | woodpeck ♦2,421 | Appears this was a deletion of a duplicate way? User "EditWatcher" has since renamed themselves to "(Anonymous)"... | |
| 4 | 2025-03-18 07:08 | NeisReview ♦869 | Thank you for your private message and confirming that you delete a duplicate way/route. | |
| 163621945 by EmilyElizabeth07 @ 2025-03-14 18:27 | 1 | 2025-03-16 22:23 | Glassman | Same with this edit - please add the addresses back. When adding a building where an address node is, just merge the address node and building outline by selecting both then click on the + icon to merge --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets... |
| 163621669 by EmilyElizabeth07 @ 2025-03-14 18:18 | 1 | 2025-03-16 22:21 | Glassman | You removed the address from two buildings. Addresses are very helpful to have in OSM. Please add them back. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163621669 |
| 163618480 by LeNamer @ 2025-03-14 16:52 | 1 | 2025-03-16 22:16 | Glassman | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163618480 |
| 163618206 by LeNamer @ 2025-03-14 16:46 | 1 | 2025-03-16 22:14 | Glassman | did you mean landcover=grass? Glassland is more wild. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163618206 |
| 163618002 by LeNamer @ 2025-03-14 16:42 | 1 | 2025-03-16 22:12 | Glassman | Please don't use descriptive names. Just tag the building as a building like you did. I removed the descriptive name tag. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163618002 |
| 163695604 by ratrun @ 2025-03-16 16:02 | 1 | 2025-03-16 21:35 | Glassman | It appears that you are connecting the sidewalk to the road when they don't. There has been quite a bit of discussion on this subject but I don't think any consensus has been reached. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/16369560... |
| 163627392 by Padmini1105 @ 2025-03-14 21:07 | 1 | 2025-03-14 23:29 | Glassman | I have reverted all of your changes to Denali. Please consult with the community before making name changes to the peak. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/9 which also includes the Gulf of Mexico |
| 163627938 by Spaghetti Monster🍝 @ 2025-03-14 21:26 | 1 | 2025-03-14 23:20 | Glassman | Thanks for keep it named correctly |
| 163552996 by vmàri @ 2025-03-13 03:38 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:01 | Glassman | Question - the section you added as a track, the county shows as a country road. Could it just be a gravel section of residential road? BTW - I aligned the road using lidar imagery. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163552996 ... |
| 2 | 2025-03-13 22:18 | vmàri ♦1 | The newly changed section is not maintained and nor graveled (and never has been). It is muddy and impassable by most vehicles, and arguably a "path" instead of a "track". The sections on either side are tagged correctly as maintained gravel roads. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-13 22:56 | Glassman | Thanks for the feedback. | |
| 163556950 by Tealady @ 2025-03-13 06:54 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:37 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.You added a building where one already existed. Also, there appear to be... |
| 163556341 by Tealady @ 2025-03-13 06:27 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:33 | Glassman | Not sure why you removed the coffee shop you just added but left the tag amenity=cafe. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163556341 |
| 163556238 by Tealady @ 2025-03-13 06:24 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:27 | Glassman | Check out how opening_hours should be tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163556238 |
| 163555616 by Tealady @ 2025-03-13 06:00 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:25 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555616 |
| 163555162 by camiboh @ 2025-03-13 05:40 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:24 | Glassman | One looks square, the other doesn't --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555162 |
| 163555145 by camiboh @ 2025-03-13 05:39 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:23 | Glassman | Another bldg that needs to be squared. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555145 |
| 163555114 by camiboh @ 2025-03-13 05:37 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:23 | Glassman | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555114 |
| 163555442 by brenna clark @ 2025-03-13 05:53 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:22 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555442 |
| 163555404 by brenna clark @ 2025-03-13 05:52 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:21 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555404 |
| 163555196 by brenna clark @ 2025-03-13 05:41 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:21 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555196 |
| 163555126 by brenna clark @ 2025-03-13 05:38 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:20 | Glassman | #TIP: square the buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555126 |
| 163555041 by Blackberyybushes @ 2025-03-13 05:33 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:12 | Glassman | Please add a tag to describe the business type. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555041 |
| 163554985 by Blackberyybushes @ 2025-03-13 05:31 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:11 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.I reverted this edit because of the number of errors. A building was poo... |
| 163554834 by Blackberyybushes @ 2025-03-13 05:23 | 1 | 2025-03-13 22:07 | Glassman | Besides the name, a tag describing the business is also needed. I'll send you info on OSM with a link to our wiki that should help you figure out what the appropriate tag would be. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163554834 ... |
| 163547200 by Benboy7700 @ 2025-03-12 22:03 | 1 | 2025-03-13 21:52 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.Two suggestions to improve your edits. First save and upload before moving to a distant location. Second, add a tag to describe the business. For example, the gun club could be leisure=sports_center + sport=shooting. --... |
| 163542515 by TJ Beach @ 2025-03-12 19:29 | 1 | 2025-03-13 21:47 | Glassman | Google does not allow use of their imagery in OSM. Fortunately, Bing does allow us to use their imagery otherwise we would have had to revert this edit. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163542515 |
| 163539316 by Shawnster @ 2025-03-12 17:45 Active block | 1 | 2025-03-13 21:38 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.There were a number of errors. Some minor other significant. For example... |
| 2 | 2025-03-13 21:41 | Glassman | Also - save and upload your edit before moving to a distant location. | |
| 163506426 by Kodiak98363 @ 2025-03-11 23:47 | 1 | 2025-03-12 17:14 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163506426 |
| 163503491 by RangerKyle @ 2025-03-11 21:35 | 1 | 2025-03-12 17:09 | Glassman | It looks like you deleted some features that were tagged as abandoned. Those are allowed in OSM but shouldn't show up on trail maps. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163503491 |
| 163503763 by khevans @ 2025-03-11 21:45 | 1 | 2025-03-12 17:06 | Glassman | I'm guessing there is a roof over the gas pumps. It's best to tag the polygon as building=roof + level=1. Adding the level tag allows service road to go under the roof without causing a validation error. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org... |
| 163503109 by khevans @ 2025-03-11 21:22 | 1 | 2025-03-12 17:04 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163503109 |
| 163502095 by Rene Martin @ 2025-03-11 20:50 | 1 | 2025-03-12 17:02 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502095 |
| 163502299 by Rene Martin @ 2025-03-11 20:56 | 1 | 2025-03-12 17:02 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502299 |
| 163502253 by Rene Martin @ 2025-03-11 20:54 | 1 | 2025-03-12 17:02 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502253 |
| 163502010 by Rene Martin @ 2025-03-11 20:47 | 1 | 2025-03-12 16:48 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.It looks like you moved an address from the correct location. See https:... |
| 163501781 by Rene Martin @ 2025-03-11 20:42 | 1 | 2025-03-12 16:43 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163501781 |
| 163501066 by Rene Martin @ 2025-03-11 20:18 | 1 | 2025-03-12 16:43 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163501066 |
| 163497081 by myajean @ 2025-03-11 18:14 | 1 | 2025-03-12 16:41 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163497081 |
| 163497013 by myajean @ 2025-03-11 18:12 | 1 | 2025-03-12 16:41 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163497013 |
| 163496976 by myajean @ 2025-03-11 18:11 | 1 | 2025-03-12 16:40 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163496976 |
| 163496953 by myajean @ 2025-03-11 18:10 | 1 | 2025-03-12 16:40 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163496953 |
| 163466820 by Couldabeenanemail @ 2025-03-11 02:55 | 1 | 2025-03-11 17:51 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good with the exception of descriptive names. We do not use descriptive names in OSM. Instead, find a tag that best describes the feature. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCH... |
| 163422261 by US-101 Area Freeways Monitor @ 2025-03-10 00:48 Active block | 1 | 2025-03-10 18:09 | Glassman | There is no road across 101. Reverting --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422261 |
| 163422488 by US-101 Area Freeways Monitor @ 2025-03-10 01:07 Active block | 1 | 2025-03-10 18:06 | Glassman | Also a trunk. Reverting. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422488 |
| 163422475 by US-101 Area Freeways Monitor @ 2025-03-10 01:06 Active block | 1 | 2025-03-10 18:05 | Glassman | Same again. It's not even a divided highway. reverting. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422475 |
| 163422444 by US-101 Area Freeways Monitor @ 2025-03-10 01:03 Active block | 1 | 2025-03-10 18:05 | Glassman | This is also a trunk. Reverting. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422444 |
| 163422417 by US-101 Area Freeways Monitor @ 2025-03-10 01:01 Active block | 1 | 2025-03-10 18:04 | Glassman | The local community has agreed that this is a trunk. I'm going to revert. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163422417 |
| 163378278 by DenizWilson @ 2025-03-08 20:18 | 1 | 2025-03-09 18:26 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.One suggestion. Try not to connect the trail to the park landuse. If either change, it requires disconnecting nodes. Also, Is this a trail or more like a gravel sidewalk? OSM, which started in England, uses British English terms... |
| 163229741 by Nataslay @ 2025-03-05 06:24 | 1 | 2025-03-08 00:56 | Glassman | A couple of questions. You tagged a house on E. Mill Plain Blvd as a place of worship. It looks more like a plain house. Is it really a place of worship, or maybe the pastors house?Also you tagged two house as tourism=apartment. I think a better way is to tag it as building=apartments. There bui... |
| 163306481 by Matt Bianconi @ 2025-03-07 00:40 | 1 | 2025-03-07 17:19 | Glassman | It is my understanding that there must be some sort of barrier between ways before the way is separated. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway. I just drove over it yesterday and I don't recall seeing any barriers. Can you review this edit? --- ... |
| 2 | 2025-03-07 18:24 | Matt Bianconi ♦2 | Ugh, what a limiting policy. There is a low cement barrier at the end towards Pacific place. I will revert and split only at the cement barrier | |
| 163289956 by psnideriii @ 2025-03-06 15:25 | 1 | 2025-03-06 20:28 | Glassman | Those signs indicate that the road is privately owned and maintained. The correct tag would be ownership=private. Unless there is a no trespassing sign, the access=private should not be used. access=destination might be appropriate. Can you review this edit? Thanks --- ... |
| 163231910 by PhantomGamingHDTV @ 2025-03-05 07:37 | 1 | 2025-03-05 17:16 | Glassman | That does not look like a meadow? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163231910 |
| 163231539 by PhantomGamingHDTV @ 2025-03-05 07:26 | 1 | 2025-03-05 17:16 | Glassman | Why did you remove building that are still shown on imagery? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163231539 |
| 163216636 by 01Smith @ 2025-03-04 19:39 | 1 | 2025-03-05 17:00 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163216636 |
| 163208815 by Natron516 @ 2025-03-04 16:19 | 1 | 2025-03-05 16:59 | Glassman | I removed some of what you did. The secondary highway is likely a service road. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. You may want to read the wiki on how to map features. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163208815 ... |
| 163148265 by Toby Marie Stout @ 2025-03-03 07:18 | 1 | 2025-03-04 22:43 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.This appears to be all fictitious. I'm reverting it. If you disagre... |
| 163185207 by phillsmapin @ 2025-03-04 04:09 | 1 | 2025-03-04 22:36 | Glassman | #TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time unabbreviating. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163185207 |
| 163145350 by Maxwell Hilton @ 2025-03-03 04:42 | 1 | 2025-03-03 19:45 | Glassman | A couple of issues - first the leveled land, should like be tagged as landuse=brownfield instead of using a descriptive name. The fence tag is appropriate.Also the trail you added, stops just short of SE 41st Dr. Should it connect? Also, this looks like private property. Is there a public path t... |
| 163146399 by mylogrimes @ 2025-03-03 05:52 | 1 | 2025-03-03 19:26 | Glassman | Not sure why your removed the highway=residential tag from NE 126th Ct, but I added it back.Also you added a duplicate driveway, house and shed. I removed the duplicates. Also, we don't use descriptive names, like Shed or Driveway, instead tag them appropriately, for example highway=service... |
| 163098843 by Auria M @ 2025-03-01 18:44 | 1 | 2025-03-02 17:47 | Glassman | You should check out the wiki for how to map pedestrian ways. For example, the crossing:island is typically a node at the island, though I have drawn it as a way, but just for the island. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island. --- Publish... |
| 163075569 by Ethan-h3 @ 2025-03-01 03:59 | 1 | 2025-03-01 16:47 | Glassman | Looks like you acidentially extended NE 71st St next to and old path. I've removed the path. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163075569 |
| 163020462 by Lydia Roush @ 2025-02-27 16:42 | 1 | 2025-03-01 01:28 | Glassman | Why the access=destination? access=destination is typically used on private property to allow people to get to a destination. I don't think I've ever seen it in public spaces. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163020462 ... |
| 163020191 by Lydia Roush @ 2025-02-27 16:34 | 1 | 2025-03-01 01:22 | Glassman | We typically do not remove informal trails, instead we mark them as informal and access=no. Could you review your edit? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163020191 |
| 163015405 by Diagon @ 2025-02-27 14:39 | 1 | 2025-03-01 01:06 | Glassman | Just to let you know the park was already mapped. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163015405 |
| 2 | 2025-03-04 06:35 | Diagon ♦1 | Thanks. I actually did that before I had an account. I didn't know it'd be uploaded. I'll have to figure out how this whole thing works! ... --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163015405 | |
| 163066760 by LittlePiplup @ 2025-02-28 19:35 | 1 | 2025-02-28 19:45 | Glassman | i have reverted this edit. This is not what the community has agreed on. Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Mexico before editing the name of this feature. Undiscussed changes will be reverted. ... |
| 163066448 by AetheralMeowstic @ 2025-02-28 19:23 | 1 | 2025-02-28 19:45 | Glassman | i have reverted this edit. This is not what the community has agreed on. Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Mexico before editing the name of this feature. Undiscussed changes will be reverted. ... |
| 162918558 by Davis Peak @ 2025-02-25 06:47 | 1 | 2025-02-26 17:31 | Glassman | I could not find any records of the road in the counties data. Doesn't show on bing imagery or lidar map so I removed it. If there is a road there it may just be a track. unclassified is like a residential road in rural areas. --- Published using OSMCha: ... |
| 2 | 2025-02-26 18:41 | Davis Peak ♦1 | Thank you for reviewing my edits. This particular gravel road is invisible from aerial photos because of the dense tree cover. The road is sourced from the DNR FPAMT: https://fpamt.dnr.wa.gov/2d-view#activity?-13650418,-13649272,5780717,5781258?WADNR_PUBLIC_Public_Land_Survey!8!4!0!,WADNR_PUBLIC_FP_... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-26 20:47 | Glassman | I restored the road but made it a track. I also noticed from the website you referenced, Davis Peak Road is named PH-1000. Though I know many of these roads have duplicate names. Can you confirm that it is called Davis Peak Road? --- Published using OSMCha: ht... | |
| 4 | 2025-02-26 23:15 | Davis Peak ♦1 | Indeed, it has a DNR name, and a county name. I think the county name is more appropriate in this case. My source for the name comes from this new address notification document: https://www.cowlitzinfo.net/WLBldgAddress/DocView.aspx?id=31550485&dbid=0&repo=CCIMAGES&searchid=de4a8fec-... | |
| 5 | 2025-02-26 23:20 | Davis Peak ♦1 | For whatever reason, going further east along Davis Peak road, it gets renamed Aho Carson. That is very likely not accurate, but I have no source. Logically, it seems like it should be called Davis Peak Road until it reaches Davis Peak! | |
| 6 | 2025-02-27 03:11 | Glassman | I'd probably go ahead and rename it Davis Peak Road unless it's signed. Many of the roads in the Cascade mountains are from very old data, and likely wrong. | |
| 162918365 by Davis Peak @ 2025-02-25 06:36 | 1 | 2025-02-26 17:29 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918365 |
| 162918326 by Davis Peak @ 2025-02-25 06:35 | 1 | 2025-02-26 17:29 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918326 |
| 162918247 by Davis Peak @ 2025-02-25 06:31 | 1 | 2025-02-26 17:29 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918247 |
| 162876528 by ABESTER1 @ 2025-02-24 05:37 | 1 | 2025-02-24 06:07 | pwbriggs ♦38 | Thanks for the contribution, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!I see the new buildings aren't in any aerial imagery yet, which makes it difficult to trace them. However, we can still add metadata about them. If you know the addresses of the new buildings, for example, feel free to add new addres... |
| 2 | 2025-02-25 00:45 | Glassman | I would also add that the editor can remove the object but save the address. Just copy the buildings tags to a node, then use right click on use the downgrade tool to remove excess tags, leaving just the address. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/... | |
| 162867189 by NaomivanRoon @ 2025-02-23 20:03 | 1 | 2025-02-25 00:39 | Glassman | The waterfall was already mapped. When adding a waterfall, it should be a node on a stream. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Waterfalls for more info on how to map waterfalls. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162867189 ... |
| 162801189 by yashpheh @ 2025-02-22 01:26 | 1 | 2025-02-22 22:28 | Glassman | Did you use google to add information to OSM? Google does not allow it's data to be used. If you did use google, the information you got from google should be removed. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162801189 |
| 162799341 by NicoleW1 @ 2025-02-21 23:13 | 1 | 2025-02-22 22:26 | Glassman | Welcome to OSM. Do you have any information on what area the subalpine meadow sensitive area covers? Be nice to add to OSM.Also, the natural tag should be one of values found on the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural. I'm not familiar with the value you added but happy ... |
| 162799109 by K7AAY @ 2025-02-21 23:00 | 1 | 2025-02-22 22:22 | Glassman | The shooting range is already tagged. When you do add a feature, besure to tag it properly. The English Pit Gun Range is tagged as leisure=sports_centre + sport=shooting. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osm... |
| 162767227 by vitalitymedicalpnw @ 2025-02-21 07:15 | 1 | 2025-02-21 17:01 | NeisBot ♦2,168 | Hello, thank you for your contribution.I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SpamCould you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?#M... |
| 2 | 2025-02-21 17:12 | Glassman | spam - removed --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162767227 | |
| 162752239 by JustQuitNow @ 2025-02-20 18:09 | 1 | 2025-02-21 17:03 | Glassman | Instead of adding a node for landuse, it's better to add the information to the existing landuse. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162752239 |
| 162752010 by JustQuitNow @ 2025-02-20 18:03 | 1 | 2025-02-21 17:00 | Glassman | Please provide a changeset comment. These comments can help you and others. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162752010 |
| 162725524 by jdanek @ 2025-02-20 05:48 | 1 | 2025-02-20 18:18 | Glassman | #TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time unabbreviating --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162725524 |
| 162717833 by SaM4219 @ 2025-02-19 21:24 | 1 | 2025-02-20 18:16 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162717833 |
| 162717786 by SaM4219 @ 2025-02-19 21:22 | 1 | 2025-02-20 18:16 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162717786 |
| 162717731 by SaM4219 @ 2025-02-19 21:20 | 1 | 2025-02-20 18:16 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162717731 |
| 162130444 by John Harvester @ 2025-02-04 15:21 Active block | 1 | 2025-02-20 02:55 | Glassman | Farmland typically doesn't have names like 8Please remove the names unless there is a sign for the field. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162130444 |
| 2 | 2025-02-24 23:32 | John Harvester Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 162722664 by John Harvester @ 2025-02-20 02:29 Active block | 1 | 2025-02-20 02:53 | Glassman | Can you explain why your removed the streams when adding the farmland? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162722664 |
| 162688988 by Maksim Melnikau @ 2025-02-19 07:44 | 1 | 2025-02-19 17:18 | Glassman | This looks more like a service road. Please review this edit. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162688988 |
| 2 | 2025-02-21 06:38 | Maksim Melnikau ♦3 | Hello! Thanks for your feedback! I have made corrections according to your comment. I agree with you, after all, it does not look like a residential area and it would be more appropriate to use the "service" tag. Best regards, Maksim. --- Published u... | |
| 162689338 by Maksim Melnikau @ 2025-02-19 07:55 | 1 | 2025-02-19 17:16 | Glassman | Why is the driveway tagged as private? Driveways are private ways. We should only add the private tag when the driveway is tagged as no trespassing or there is a gate. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162689338 |
| 2 | 2025-02-21 06:37 | Maksim Melnikau ♦3 | Hi! Thanks for your comment! I'll review the road and remove the "access=private" tag. This tag will not be applied to driveways in the future. Best wishes, Maksim. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162689338 ... | |
| 162689291 by Maksim Melnikau @ 2025-02-19 07:54 | 1 | 2025-02-19 17:13 | Glassman | The slip road should be separated by a physical barrier to create a separate way. I'm going to revert this edit. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary_link --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162689291 ... |
| 2 | 2025-02-21 06:36 | Maksim Melnikau ♦3 | Hi! Thank you for your feedback and for correcting the road. I will take that into account in the future. Best regards, Maksim. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162689291 | |
| 162642739 by TacomaCommunity @ 2025-02-18 03:11 | 1 | 2025-02-19 02:56 | Glassman | #TIP: In OSM street names are spelled out - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162642739 |
| 162642545 by TacomaCommunity @ 2025-02-18 02:57 | 1 | 2025-02-19 02:55 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162642545 |
| 162592062 by Jdeasis @ 2025-02-17 00:51 | 1 | 2025-02-17 21:15 | Glassman | Why did you move the power poll? The pole shadow is visible in the imagery. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162592062 |
| 162591988 by Jdeasis @ 2025-02-17 00:47 | 1 | 2025-02-17 21:10 | Glassman | This edit had some errors which have been fixed. First the triangle area tagged with the name=Marsh Land isn't accurate. First the wetlands are much bigger, second the wetlands are already tagged.You moved an address node a few blocks to the north. Not sure why.Also, the curb ramp shoul... |
| 162591821 by Jdeasis @ 2025-02-17 00:34 | 1 | 2025-02-17 20:54 | Glassman | Besides the name, adding a tag to describe the business is very helpful. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162591821 |
| 162592096 by Sfran1 @ 2025-02-17 00:53 | 1 | 2025-02-17 17:20 | Glassman | I have reverted the removal of a visible driveway. Please do not continue to remove features that exist as I explained before. If you do not agree with me, please leave a changeset comment explaining why it should be removed. --- Published using OSMCha: https:... |
| 162558480 by Metsiyu @ 2025-02-16 04:57 | 1 | 2025-02-16 22:11 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.Could you add the names to the other buildings, assuming they have names?I also noticed that the Charles Wright Academy area is not name --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: h... |
| 162550885 by Uriel Aguilar @ 2025-02-15 21:00 | 1 | 2025-02-15 21:17 | Glassman | No estoy seguro de lo que intentas lograr, pero los nodos no contienen ninguna etiqueta. Estaré encantado de ayudarte, solo tienes que comunicarte conmigo.In English:I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish but the nodes do not contain any tags. I'm happy to help, just... |
| 2 | 2025-02-15 22:03 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162552574, 162552571 where the changeset comment is: revert broken import attempt | |
| 3 | 2025-02-18 14:01 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162662644, 162662635, 162662638, 162662639, 162662647, 162662642, 162662633, 162662587, 162662631 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy import in Guadalajara, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17264 et... | |
| 162515347 by rahulwaiba @ 2025-02-14 19:25 | 1 | 2025-02-14 19:34 | Glassman | The renaming has been discussed on the community forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571. The name will remain The Gulf of Mexico, but the US official name can be added. I'm going to revert this edit but if you disagree, please let me know. I'd ... |
| 162492465 by h123rwqik @ 2025-02-14 07:45 | 1 | 2025-02-14 18:50 | Glassman | You changed a parking lot to a park and added a crossing node to the end of a service road that doesn't connect to anything. I'm going to revert this edit mainly because of changing the parking to a park. If you are curious, the parking lot is part of the Grass Lawn Park ready. If you disa... |
| 162492605 by h123rwqik @ 2025-02-14 07:50 | 1 | 2025-02-14 18:47 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.Descriptive names like School Dropoff Point, are not used in OSM. As far... |
| 162492540 by h123rwqik @ 2025-02-14 07:47 | 1 | 2025-02-14 18:41 | Glassman | The path should connect to a road to be used by routers. Can you connect this to the road? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162492540 |
| 162485441 by Matt Bianconi @ 2025-02-14 00:25 | 1 | 2025-02-14 00:41 | Glassman | Wow - that was quick. It's interesting, I just pulled up the city boundary because of the county website post about the planning group. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162485441 |
| 162476809 by Matt Bianconi @ 2025-02-13 18:18 | 1 | 2025-02-13 20:40 | Glassman | Did you use the county's boundary data for the city's boundary? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162476809 |
| 2 | 2025-02-13 23:55 | Matt Bianconi ♦2 | I apologize, no. I used the City of Mount Vernon interactive map https://www.mountvernonwa.gov/1331/Interactive-Maps and assumed the city limits followed the road's curve. The Skagit County auditor map does show a little bump out at the corner. https://www.skagitcounty.net/Maps/iMap/ I will t... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-14 00:27 | Matt Bianconi ♦2 | Glassman please see Changeset: 162485441 for more extensive fix | |
| 162437515 by Sanguine Banana @ 2025-02-12 16:50 | 1 | 2025-02-13 19:08 | Glassman | #TIP: In OSM we spell out street names because software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you fix the houses streetname? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162437515 |
| 162444697 by mikaeldui @ 2025-02-12 20:37 | 1 | 2025-02-12 22:03 | Glassman | is alt_name:sv=Amerikanska golfen correct? Does Sweden refer to the gulf that way? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162444697 |
| 2 | 2025-02-12 22:07 | mikaeldui ♦12 | @Glassman I believe so. "Mexikanska golfen" is still the official name as far as I know. Here's one source (popular newspaper): https://www.gp.se/nyheter/varlden/karttjansterna-overens-nu-heter-det-amerikanska-golfen.e5ba9a9e-dc75-4cd9-9c8d-8eec62d7452f | |
| 3 | 2025-02-12 22:13 | mikaeldui ♦12 | The article's title is "It's now called the American Gulf", so many Swedes probably think that "Amerikanska golfen" is what Swedes should call it. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-12 23:55 | Glassman | Can I get you to discuss this alt name on the community forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/177 | |
| 5 | 2025-02-13 08:27 | Hidoo00 ♦70 | @Glassman Obviously the name used is "Mexikanska golfen" and that most likely will never change. As for alt_name, that would imply it is used as an alternative. In this case, it's not, and again, probably never will be other than as a joke, bus this raises the question whether there i... | |
| 6 | 2025-02-13 08:33 | mikaeldui ♦12 | As the Swedish newspapers have told the citizens of Sweden that they should now use "Amerikanska golfen" then that should probably be an alternative name. | |
| 7 | 2025-02-13 08:39 | mikaeldui ♦12 | I'm aware that my IQ is off the charts so I've tried to explain it so that anyone can understand it. "Amerikanska golfen" is now the official name in Sweden according to the newspapers. Does that make any sense? It's not something that shouldn't be on the map. | |
| 8 | 2025-02-13 09:41 | loffa ♦4 | According to the newspaper linked above the name on sources such as Google Maps and Apple maps has been changed to "Amerikanska Golfen". The newspaper just states that other maps have changed the name in their dataset.However it does NOT say that this has been officially recognized by ... | |
| 9 | 2025-02-13 17:38 | Glassman | Because of the changeset comments, I have decided to revert this edit. | |
| 162448624 by 𒂼𒄄 @ 2025-02-12 23:46 | 1 | 2025-02-12 23:54 | Glassman | Please consult with the OSM community on adding alt names to the Gulf. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/177 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162448624 |
| 2 | 2025-02-12 23:58 | 𒂼𒄄 ♦40 | @Glassman اسم خليج امريكا هو اسم مستخدم كاسم ثانوي عند بعض ناطقي اللغة العربية وفي الشرق الاوسط كاسم وصفي وشائع حتى قبل تسميته كأسم رسمي من قبل الولايات المتحدة. تحيات... | |
| 162412725 by jgduffy20 @ 2025-02-12 02:20 | 1 | 2025-02-12 17:31 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162412725 |
| 162409434 by MaisyDinosaur @ 2025-02-11 22:28 | 1 | 2025-02-12 17:29 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162409434 |
| 162409713 by EskridgeStudios @ 2025-02-11 22:42 | 1 | 2025-02-12 01:29 | Glassman | #TIP: use landuse=farmyard for areas where the farmer has buildings, storage, and keeping animals. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard |
| 162404473 by Spaghetti Monster🍝 @ 2025-02-11 19:35 | 1 | 2025-02-11 22:36 | Glassman | Thanks for fixing |
| 162375441 by EskridgeStudios @ 2025-02-11 04:26 | 1 | 2025-02-11 17:51 | Glassman | There are some issues with your contribution. First, the roads into the farms are usually highway=service. Residential roads are usually maintained by the a local government. The footway you added in the farmland next to Shawnee Road look more like highway=track. Ideally they should connect to a... |
| 162368823 by graycodekitty @ 2025-02-10 21:31 | 1 | 2025-02-11 17:40 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162368823 |
| 162337113 by cascadianstarlight @ 2025-02-10 06:27 | 1 | 2025-02-10 19:29 | Glassman | #TIP: Don't forget to remove the other starbucks tags, like brand and brand:wikidata --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162337113 |
| 2 | 2025-02-10 20:06 | cascadianstarlight ♦5 | I saw on the wiki that prefixing tags with "disused:" is one way to do it. Is it better to prefix all the tags with that or should I just completely remove them? | |
| 3 | 2025-02-10 20:13 | Glassman | I typically only use the disued when the business location is unoccupied. With the new business, I'd recommend just removing all of the old starbucks tags. The history of the node will still show that starbucks once occupied the place. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-10 20:35 | cascadianstarlight ♦5 | Ah, that makes sense. I've updated the original node's tags and removed the new node I created. | |
| 162327697 by cascadianstarlight @ 2025-02-09 20:21 | 1 | 2025-02-10 19:26 | Glassman | #TIP: In OSM we spell out street names. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you fix addr:street? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162327697 |
| 2 | 2025-02-10 19:59 | cascadianstarlight ♦5 | thanks for the tip, fixed! | |
| 162303615 by ExcitedPasta @ 2025-02-09 07:29 | 1 | 2025-02-09 18:54 | Glassman | Another restaurant is shown operating out of the entire building. Did Saigon Drip replace the other restaurant? Can you review this edit? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162303615 |
| 162268799 by ExcitedPasta @ 2025-02-08 06:13 | 1 | 2025-02-09 18:51 | Glassman | I don't believe the Burke-Gilman trail is the right street. Can you recheck the address? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162268799 |
| 162265495 by viper4 @ 2025-02-08 01:01 | 1 | 2025-02-09 18:48 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162265495 |
| 162265402 by viper4 @ 2025-02-08 00:52 | 1 | 2025-02-09 18:48 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162265402 |
| 162262144 by mgmaier03 @ 2025-02-07 21:48 | 1 | 2025-02-09 18:46 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162262144 |
| 162267146 by OddlyAngled @ 2025-02-08 03:33 | 1 | 2025-02-08 17:07 | Glassman | How did you ever find this building? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162267146 |
| 2 | 2025-02-08 19:26 | OddlyAngled ♦100 | by accident, I was looking for evidence of the old trail above the mine and saw this on satellite imagery. the building is outlined on the old USGS quads too, probably an easier place to start. | |
| 162251455 by quincylvania @ 2025-02-07 16:13 | 1 | 2025-02-07 23:23 | Glassman | OSMCha doesn't seem to be able to handle this large edit. Can you give more detail as to what was done? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162251455 |
| 2 | 2025-02-08 04:45 | quincylvania ♦53 | Hi Glassman, this changeset just adds the tag `protected_area=game_land` to protected areas operated by Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife. This is part of a `protected_area=` tagging effect that @jake-low and I are experimenting with to create better `boundary=protected_area` subcategorie... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-08 19:25 | jake-low ♦9 | @quincylvania I think that while the majority of the protected areas you retagged are indeed game lands, some are not. Not all areas operated by WDFW are managed for hunting. In particular, a bunch of small coastal wildlife areas are protected beaches or estuaries. Shore fishing and clamming seem to... | |
| 4 | 2025-02-09 03:50 | quincylvania ♦53 | @jake-low Okay gotcha. I'm happy to manually revert this edit if you'd rather look at these one by one. I'm honestly not too satisfied with the `game_land` value. I don't think it's self-explanatory to a wide audience, and I don't want to imply hunting is the main or on... | |
| 5 | 2025-02-09 18:22 | jake-low ♦9 | No need to revert, but yeah, let's discuss this on Slack. I personally like the value `game_land` but I think we should formally define it on the wiki to make sure we (and other users) are on the same page about what it means. | |
| 162074654 by rawlink @ 2025-02-03 08:21 | 1 | 2025-02-04 23:45 | Glassman | Thanks for fixing the house numbers. Please note that there is already a park. The address node is for the park. I'd suggest adding it back to the park boundary. Let me know if you need help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/16207... |
| 2 | 2025-02-07 06:45 | rawlink ♦1 | I'll see if I can find what the address is for the park on northeast 9th pl. The address that was assigned to it was for the home right next to it. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-07 16:27 | Glassman | Looking at King County IMAP, there doesn't appear to be an address. See https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/ | |
| 4 | 2025-02-09 04:34 | rawlink ♦1 | If you look at the Renton GIS system, it looks like it could be 5298, but that seems to be more the address for the corner and not necessarily the lot.https://maps.rentonwa.gov/Html5viewer/Index.html?viewer=CORAddressLocator | |
| 5 | 2025-02-09 04:37 | rawlink ♦1 | btw, thanks for making me aware of the king county GIS system. Now I have another tool in the belt :-) | |
| 162185970 by BuiltforPeople @ 2025-02-05 22:37 | 1 | 2025-02-07 00:11 | Glassman | FYI - an unclassified road is basically just a rural residential road. We do this because OSM was started in England so we use their road classification system. I mention this because you changed an unclassified road to residential.I notice you removed a footway near West Railroad Avenue. Is the... |
| 2 | 2025-02-07 00:45 | BuiltforPeople ♦1 | 1. Thanks for the background on the road classification system. I'm not sure exactly which one this comment refers to, but it is noted.2. The footpath was removed because it doesn't exist. It is correctly represented as "St. Edwards Trail" just nearby. --- ... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-07 00:54 | Glassman | I mentioned unclassified because Lake Trask Road was changed from unclassified to residential. By looking at the imagery, Lake Trask Road looks like an unclassified to me. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162185970 | |
| 4 | 2025-02-07 01:41 | BuiltforPeople ♦1 | I concur. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162185970 | |
| 162194140 by smileymouse @ 2025-02-06 07:08 | 1 | 2025-02-07 00:29 | Glassman | We spell out street name in OSM, the reason is that software has a hard time unabbrevating. I went ahead and fixed them --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162194140 |
| 162190830 by bradyc @ 2025-02-06 03:53 | 1 | 2025-02-07 00:18 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.Please don't vandalize OSM. Both of your edits have been reverted.\... |
| 162190750 by bradyc @ 2025-02-06 03:47 | 1 | 2025-02-07 00:18 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.Please don't vandalize OSM --- #REVIEWED_... |
| 162139990 by JWeiss206 @ 2025-02-04 19:49 | 1 | 2025-02-07 00:00 | Glassman | The path was tagged as access=private. Because of that I reverted your edit but did add a tag ownership=private. If you disagree, please explain why. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/16... |
| 162138990 by SpicyPants5544 @ 2025-02-04 19:14 | 1 | 2025-02-06 23:55 | Glassman | One website shows the site as active. See https://www.airnav.com/airport/WA75. Not sure how accurate the site is. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162138990 |
| 162062476 by ManitoCanonMapper @ 2025-02-02 20:43 | 1 | 2025-02-04 23:43 | Glassman | I fixed the relationship and also removed the name from the guest house. We don't add names unless it is signed. Feel free to add it back if there is a sign.I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.o... |
| 162014931 by lewisdbs @ 2025-02-01 15:23 | 1 | 2025-02-04 23:22 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162014931 |
| 161993352 by Glassman @ 2025-01-31 21:44 | 1 | 2025-02-04 08:01 | nickvet419 ♦91 | could be changed once the USGS national map is updated. https://apps.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ |
| 2 | 2025-02-04 14:42 | Glassman | nickvet419 please read the comments in the community forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 for a better understanding of how the community views this matter. | |
| 162068466 by MelancholicSlav @ 2025-02-03 02:08 | 1 | 2025-02-03 02:29 | Glassman | Why did you remove some of the names in other languages? Have you read the discussion on https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/9 - Mostly about the Gulf of Mexico, but Denali is also included. After reading the community forum, please explain why this edit sho... |
| 2 | 2025-02-03 03:02 | MelancholicSlav ♦21 | I have been keeping up with the forum discussion and have reread the messages related to Denali. I removed a few of the languages because I assumed they were transliterations. If there are authoritative sources proving that each multilingual name is a valid exonym, then they should be added or r... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-03 16:08 | Glassman | Can you add the names back that you believe are transliterations unless you know they are wrong. Also, official_name:en should not be there since we have the tag official_name. Which by the way, has not been made yet. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-03 17:36 | MelancholicSlav ♦21 | I will work on finding sources for exonyms today, starting with the removed languages. | |
| 161949195 by JDS23 @ 2025-01-30 18:40 | 1 | 2025-01-31 23:43 | Glassman | Can you fix this one as well. Add a parking lot and remove the parking_aisle you added. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161949195 |
| 161948419 by JDS23 @ 2025-01-30 18:16 | 1 | 2025-01-31 23:42 | Glassman | I'd suggest creating an parking area polygon and tag it as you did the parking aisle. The parking aisle you added should be removed. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161948419 |
| 161914984 by JDS23 @ 2025-01-29 21:36 | 1 | 2025-01-31 23:40 | Glassman | Instead of tagging the service streets with the park and ride name, add a polygon area for the parking lot and name it Wheaton Way Park & Ride with park_ride=yes --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161914984 |
| 161914643 by LCurtisIntra @ 2025-01-29 21:26 | 1 | 2025-01-31 23:37 | Glassman | A couple of questions. Is the place under construction? Is the parking in building? If so create a node at the entrance to the parking and tag it as amenity=parking_entrance + parking=underground. The service road should end there. The residential road you added should really be highway=serv... |
| 161992832 by pahlavi_temecula @ 2025-01-31 21:28 | 1 | 2025-01-31 21:44 | Glassman | The community has not agreed upon rename the gulf. See the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/178 and join in to the discussion. This edit will be reverted. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.o... |
| 2 | 2025-03-08 03:30 | pahlavi_temecula ♦7 | Added it as an alternate name originally but knew it would get edit war’d like on Wikipedia. | |
| 161881145 by Sfran1 @ 2025-01-29 03:55 | 1 | 2025-01-29 21:58 | Glassman | They appear to be correctly map as driveways along with access=private which is kind of redundant. I'm going to revert this changeset. Please note that verifiable features can be added to OSM. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1618... |
| 161867142 by IsaacLeman @ 2025-01-28 17:40 | 1 | 2025-01-29 00:39 | Glassman | I can't find that peak on USGS maps. Can you point me to the source |
| 2 | 2025-01-29 01:11 | Allison P ♦1,136 | I don't think the peak is named in GNIS, but it looks like a local name in use: https://www.peakbagger.com/peak.aspx?pid=17030 | |
| 3 | 2025-01-29 03:54 | Glassman | I received the same information from another user. When I saw the name it jumped out at me as a prank and I wanted it removed if it was. I guess not. :-) | |
| 4 | 2025-01-29 04:55 | IsaacLeman ♦2 | Glassman - as Allison P linked to, my source is Peakbagger, as well as listsofjohn.com, summitpost.org, and other hiking/climbing sources. From what I can tell, the climbing community has used this name since the 1980’s, potentially the original source is a Fred Beckey climbing guide. This n... | |
| 161880490 by eagsc7 @ 2025-01-29 03:10 | 1 | 2025-01-29 03:28 | Glassman | I have reverted this changeset. The name has not been agreed upon by the community. I suggest you read https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/87. |
| 161837721 by beephonk @ 2025-01-27 22:51 | 1 | 2025-01-28 20:54 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. We do not use descriptive names, such as Ayatma Rope swing unless there is an actual sign with that name. Can you review this node? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMC... |
| 161838521 by PremierAirportShuttleSeattle @ 2025-01-27 23:38 | 1 | 2025-01-28 20:51 | Glassman | reverted changeset. SEO just changed address but didn't move node. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161838521 |
| 161834430 by PremierAirportShuttleSeattle @ 2025-01-27 20:47 | 1 | 2025-01-28 20:47 | Glassman | You can't just change the address without moving the node to the new location. I'm going to revert these edits. Let me know if you need help doing this right. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161834430 |
| 161831689 by Scimitar Ridge Ranch LLC @ 2025-01-27 19:16 | 1 | 2025-01-28 20:44 | Glassman | I think the roads you added should be highway=service. highway=residential and highway=unclassified are typically government operated roads. residential are those in a city while unclassified are residential roads typically found in rural areas. Since these seem to be associated with Scimitar Ridge ... |
| 161860010 by טריסטרם @ 2025-01-28 14:30 | 1 | 2025-01-28 16:09 | Glassman | May I suggest not using alt_name:he but instead name:he tag to be more consistent with the other language versions of the gulf? |
| 2 | 2025-01-28 16:15 | jogemu ♦44 | Why was alt_name:vi removed? Maybe you renamed alt_name:vi to alt_name:he instead of adding the alt_name:he. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-28 16:23 | Glassman | There is a tag name:vi = Vinh Mexico. I don't speak or read Vietnamese so I can say it is correct. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161860010 | |
| 4 | 2025-01-28 16:41 | jogemu ♦44 | I don't speak it either but the Vietnamese Wikipedia of México mentions that Mễ Tây Cơ is indeed the Sino-Vietnamese word. The question was directed towards טריסטרם in expectation of some justification in case the removal wasn't a mistake. I assume a not was missing,... | |
| 5 | 2025-01-28 16:47 | טריסטרם ♦2 | Sorry.. I did it by mistake | |
| 6 | 2025-01-28 16:48 | טריסטרם ♦2 | Please help me revert it | |
| 7 | 2025-01-28 16:55 | jogemu ♦44 | Is this what you want?alt_name:vi=Vịnh Mễ Tây Cơname:he=מפרץ מקסיקוWithout alt_name:heIn that case there is no need for a revert. | |
| 8 | 2025-01-28 16:58 | jogemu ♦44 | You/I can just fix the values with a new changeset. But first I need to confirm that both our suggestions are correct. | |
| 9 | 2025-01-28 17:02 | טריסטרם ♦2 | thats OK | |
| 10 | 2025-01-28 19:16 | Minh Nguyen ♦562 | Fixed the Vietnamese name in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161870600 | |
| 161846146 by ijzxcnisd8i7ewod79sic @ 2025-01-28 07:27 | 1 | 2025-01-28 16:14 | Glassman | This is not the community agreed on name. I'm going to revert this changeset. The community agreed to use the tag official_name=Mount McKinley. |
| 161744642 by Luddji @ 2025-01-25 12:53 | 1 | 2025-01-26 21:47 | Glassman | Please leave a good changeset comment when updating and saving an edit. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161744642 |
| 161766950 by LumapV @ 2025-01-26 02:22 | 1 | 2025-01-26 20:02 | Glassman | It looks like you discovered the squaring tool in the editor in later contributions, but you may want to revisit previous edits to square the buildings. Let me know if you need help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161766950 ... |
| 161708154 by skitosearace @ 2025-01-24 11:24 | 1 | 2025-01-26 00:45 | Glassman | I removed this duplicate business. |
| 161728313 by Jojo4u @ 2025-01-24 21:05 | 1 | 2025-01-25 00:38 | Glassman | I don't believe the community agreed on alt_name:en-US=Gulf of America. The official document only talks about the portion of the gulf next to the US states. This node is for the whole international body of water. Please revert this edit. |
| 161720157 by mapper9645 @ 2025-01-24 16:44 | 1 | 2025-01-24 17:00 | Glassman | All of your changes to the gulf have been reverted. Please follow community guidelines. |
| 161719363 by mapper9645 @ 2025-01-24 16:23 | 1 | 2025-01-24 16:31 | Glassman | Please read the community discussions on renaming the gulf at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/50. Until the community agrees on the name, it should not be modified. This changeset has been reverted |
| 161684095 by Weatherman1228 @ 2025-01-23 17:55 | 1 | 2025-01-23 19:05 | Glassman | Please do not change or add names to the Gulf of Mexico with our agreement from the community. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/48This edit has been reverted |
| 161609235 by blattin82 @ 2025-01-21 17:23 | 1 | 2025-01-21 18:45 | Glassman | Why did you remove the highway classification? Highway classification is needed for rendering and data users to be able to use the way. Please get back to me or I will be forced to revert the edit. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1616... |
| 2 | 2025-01-21 21:09 | blattin82 ♦1 | I meant to remove North Nutmeg Street as it has recently become a fenced private property. I didnt mean to effect the highway | |
| 3 | 2025-01-21 21:38 | Glassman | I went ahead and fixed some of the streets. But I need your help with the gate. Can you place a node in the way where the gate is located? I can't see it with the bing imagery. The way past the node should be tagged as access=private. | |
| 4 | 2025-01-21 21:44 | blattin82 ♦1 | Im not sure how to do that. but the gates start right where the pink and yellow coloring merge. on both nutmeg and oak | |
| 5 | 2025-01-22 03:03 | Glassman | I don't see any gates on bing street side imagery. Can you place a couple of notes where the gates are physically located? The note tag is on the right hand side, second from the bottom. Let me know once the notes have been added. | |
| 161619825 by Eliyak @ 2025-01-22 00:51 | 1 | 2025-01-22 01:26 | jogemu ♦44 | Please do not change the name of this waterbody without prior discussion. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 |
| 2 | 2025-01-22 02:59 | Glassman | I've reverted this changeset. Once the community has reached an agreement on how it should be tagged, please do not add names to the gulf. Discussions on https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571  | |
| 161612693 by YonaAlexan18 @ 2025-01-21 19:18 | 1 | 2025-01-21 19:38 | ZeLonewolf ♦556 | This topic is being discussed here, please join the discussion before editing this node:https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico |
| 2 | 2025-01-21 19:45 | Glassman | reverted. as suggested please discusson on https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexicobefore making a name change to the gulf | |
| 161578700 by JAndermander @ 2025-01-20 21:19 | 1 | 2025-01-21 17:36 | Glassman | Shouldn't this area just be named Evergreen State College? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161578700 |
| 161584453 by Jules Bertholet @ 2025-01-21 02:49 | 1 | 2025-01-21 03:48 | Glassman | I'm reverting this changeset. Please consult with the community before renaming Mount Denali. |
| 2 | 2025-01-21 03:54 | Jules Bertholet ♦2 | What is the proper forum for this discussion? | |
| 3 | 2025-01-21 04:21 | iandees ♦723 | See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 | |
| 161573265 by iandees @ 2025-01-20 17:53 | 1 | 2025-01-20 17:55 | dieterdreist ♦836 | well done, I was just 1 minute too late :)Thank you |
| 2 | 2025-01-20 18:06 | thefabi ♦17 | The OSM-Community Discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 | |
| 3 | 2025-01-20 19:48 | Glassman | The alt_name should also be reverted. Happy to do so | |
| 4 | 2025-01-20 19:54 | iandees ♦723 | Done | |
| 5 | 2025-01-20 20:25 | dieterdreist ♦836 | arguably the alt_name is valid as of now, it doesn’t have to be official | |
| 6 | 2025-01-20 20:34 | iandees ♦723 | Trump hasn't signed any executive orders yet, he's only announced them in a speech. Executive orders need to be signed and recorded in the Federal Register, where they'll appear here: https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders | |
| 7 | 2025-01-20 21:27 | dieterdreist ♦836 | that’s for the official_name, it has nothing to do with alt_name | |
| 161508930 by Tim Scudder @ 2025-01-18 23:20 | 1 | 2025-01-20 01:45 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.You accidentally dragged nodes of ways which I fixed. It is easy to do w... |
| 161465110 by fernknuckle @ 2025-01-17 17:42 | 1 | 2025-01-18 19:29 | Glassman | Typically we don't remove trails because they are not official, instead, we mark them as informal. Having informal trail in OSM can help rescue workers when looking for lost hikers.Please review your edit. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.or... |
| 161447634 by trailstotapsrelay @ 2025-01-17 09:35 | 1 | 2025-01-18 19:15 | Glassman | There are a number of "businesses" all operating from the same unit. Is it one business or multiple? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161447634 |
| 161445204 by Cailet @ 2025-01-17 08:15 | 1 | 2025-01-17 16:25 | Glassman | Check out Snohomish County SCOPI https://scopi.snoco.org/Html5Viewer/Index.html?configBase=https://scopi.snoco.org/Geocortex/Essentials/REST/sites/SCOPI/viewers/SCOPI/virtualdirectory/Resources/Config/Default It is helpful for determining road types and names --- ... |
| 161442821 by bakerhillclimb @ 2025-01-17 06:23 | 1 | 2025-01-17 16:14 | Glassman | #TIP: Leave brief changeset comments when saving and uploading your edit. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more information --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161442821 |
| 161361504 by John1946@ @ 2025-01-14 22:34 | 1 | 2025-01-15 20:02 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161361504 |
| 161331072 by David Groh @ 2025-01-14 03:29 | 1 | 2025-01-14 17:36 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161331072 |
| 161318095 by Canoewizard @ 2025-01-13 17:11 | 1 | 2025-01-14 17:34 | Glassman | Instead of access=no, use access=private as you did on the bridge. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161318095 |
| 161293167 by 920ufidsja @ 2025-01-13 02:00 | 1 | 2025-01-13 03:03 | Glassman | Can you clarify, is the road privately owned and does it have a no trespassing sign? From what I can see Bing street view imagery does not show a no trespassing. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161293167 |
| 161275923 by GCRVPark @ 2025-01-12 14:53 | 1 | 2025-01-13 02:51 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.One suggestion, a tag is needed for the laundromat. I'd suggest shop=laundry. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161275923 |
| 161260922 by ricey267 @ 2025-01-12 04:27 | 1 | 2025-01-12 22:35 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161260922 |
| 161248121 by ynomraH dazeS @ 2025-01-11 17:37 | 1 | 2025-01-12 22:33 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161248121 |
| 161252734 by ynomraH dazeS @ 2025-01-11 20:17 | 1 | 2025-01-12 22:33 | Glassman | The pier is likely not open to motor vehicles, including aircraft. Typically it is just for pedestrians. Also you may want to look up moorings on the wiki. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mooring --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chang... |
| 161247881 by ynomraH dazeS @ 2025-01-11 17:29 | 1 | 2025-01-12 22:25 | Glassman | #TIP: When removing a business, it a good to leave the address which can likely be reused. The browser editor, iD, has a tool to remove all but the address. Just right click on the business and select the ⋁ icon. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.or... |
| 161219657 by Oddly specific @ 2025-01-10 20:38 | 1 | 2025-01-11 18:55 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.We typically tag the landuse of the church as such since it is all relig... |
| 161217146 by Oddly specific @ 2025-01-10 19:08 | 1 | 2025-01-11 18:52 | Glassman | I would suggest adding back in the tags amenity=place_of_worship, building=church, and religion=christian otherwise it will not be found in a search. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161217146 |
| 2 | 2025-01-11 19:35 | Oddly specific ♦2 | Thank you for the comment!I don't remember removing those so I am guessing I did something silly in the tool. I'll add them back in now, and change the building=yes to building=church for these. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/change... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-13 19:53 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,068 | Relevant https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-to-replace-denomination-mormon-with-denomination-latter-day-saint/116817 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Denomination%3Dlatter_day_saint | |
| 161186763 by Sierra Ohlsen @ 2025-01-09 22:35 | 1 | 2025-01-11 03:30 | Glassman | #TIP: OSM spells out street names - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you expand the street name? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161186763 |
| 161185031 by GCRVPark @ 2025-01-09 21:18 | 1 | 2025-01-11 03:27 | Glassman | According to Lincoln County WA, GIS data, the RV park doesn't extend to Southeast Brace Street. See https://lincolnwa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=bece73b1a4b04a01b776af8f832094a2. Can you review this edit and update as needed? Let me know if you need help --- ... |
| 161194924 by rene78 @ 2025-01-10 07:51 | 1 | 2025-01-10 15:59 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Hello,> Might not be a 100% accurate.Please don't do this. Mapping recent events based on news reporting is hugely problematic. OSM often sees this in war zones, where something has happened but the initial reports about what may not be 100% correct. I suspect that the situation h... |
| 2 | 2025-01-10 16:12 | rene78 ♦443 | Hi Andy,I understand your concerns, and they’re valid. However, in this case, the YouTube videos provide high-quality aerial views. I’d estimate the error rate for houses incorrectly marked as “destroyed:building” to be well below 5%. Who knows—this might even serve... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-10 20:21 | Glassman | Please consult with the OSM US community before making more edits involving the wildfire. I'd strongly suggest joining the OSM US Slack by going to osmus.slack.com. Discussions are being held in the #disasters channel. | |
| 4 | 2025-01-15 17:16 | Brendan_07 ♦4 | A more accurate source of data for this would be from the actual inspections: https://recovery.lacounty.gov/palisades-fire/ | |
| 161214185 by YerevanTreeMap @ 2025-01-10 17:21 | 1 | 2025-01-10 19:59 | Glassman | Please stop this import until you have followed the import guideline as outlined on the wiki. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 2 | 2025-01-11 06:33 | YerevanTreeMap ♦2 | OK | |
| 3 | 2025-01-11 08:23 | YerevanTreeMap ♦2 | We did create an Organized Editing Activity page in the wiki, it includes a description of how the process goes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Yerevan_Tree_Map#Import_planThere is no dataset to import per se. We had around 4k trees in our local database and th... | |
| 4 | 2025-01-11 14:45 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | > Do we still need a complex import plan described for this, with revert plan etc?Yes, if you want the data you have already imported to stay in OSM rather than be reverted.You were told what you need to do via the comments to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/YerevanTreeMap/diary/4059... | |
| 5 | 2025-01-11 14:47 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Re the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Yerevan_Tree_Map#Import_plan page, you created that AFTER this import:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Organised_Editing/Activities/Yerevan_Tree_Map&action=history | |
| 6 | 2025-01-11 16:45 | YerevanTreeMap ♦2 | Yes I have created the wiki page after I was pointed to that requirement, as a sign of respect. I did discuss this with the local OSM community and they have no issues with our activity.Also, I see in the organized editing guideline page the following text:> The Data Working group will i... | |
| 7 | 2025-01-11 16:55 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | > Do you think there are issues with edits in this changeset?Hopefully not, but I've genuinely no idea. If there are any issues I'm sure they'll become clear when the community has had chance to review the import plan and the data already uploaded, licence details, etc. | |
| 161115058 by bfsampson @ 2025-01-07 23:46 | 1 | 2025-01-08 16:55 | Glassman | Ham radio is typically tag as communication:amateur_radio:callsign=*. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:communication:amateur_radio and also with the type of tower. Either man_made=mast or man_made=tower. My guess is that it is a mast type of antenna not a tower which is typically very lar... |
| 161034748 by Laasya G @ 2025-01-05 20:03 | 1 | 2025-01-07 18:22 | Glassman | Be careful not to overlap buildings. There are a number of building overlapping in this edit. Can you fix? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161034748 |
| 161079039 by Theresa Ellingsen @ 2025-01-07 00:29 | 1 | 2025-01-07 16:29 | Glassman | Nice work --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161079039 |
| 161078472 by Theresa Ellingsen @ 2025-01-06 23:48 | 1 | 2025-01-07 16:28 | Glassman | #TIP: We typically add an address node instead of on the driveway. Or better yet, add the address to the main building. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161078472 |
| 2 | 2025-01-07 17:35 | Theresa Ellingsen ♦2 | Thanks, I had missed the bit about address nodes. The relevant places have been updated. | |
| 161008141 by GigaGyatt @ 2025-01-05 03:04 | 1 | 2025-01-07 16:21 | Glassman | Please make sure the source you used isn't copyrighted and can not be used in OSM. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161008141 |
| 161007457 by asihocunidsm @ 2025-01-05 01:59 | 1 | 2025-01-07 16:20 | Glassman | #TIP: when removing a business, also remove the associated tags, in this case soport=karting. But leave the address tags as they will likely be reused as you did in this case. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161007457 |
| 160968686 by jlrodjr @ 2025-01-03 22:18 | 1 | 2025-01-07 16:17 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160968686 |
| 160963382 by PastorEdB @ 2025-01-03 19:19 | 1 | 2025-01-07 16:16 | Glassman | #TIP: when removing a business, leave the address tags since they can be reused by the next business. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160963382 |
| 160935209 by Panic3752 @ 2025-01-03 05:58 | 1 | 2025-01-07 16:13 | Glassman | Great work adding in all the sidewalks. Here is a couple of suggestions. A roof features needs the layer=1 tag so that service roads can go under the roof. When you updated the name of the gas station, you removed the address. Those address are nice to have in OSM. Addresses are typically re... |
| 160924487 by Kelsey B1022 @ 2025-01-02 20:10 | 1 | 2025-01-07 15:59 | Glassman | #TIP: we spell out street names in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Also the street you added in your other edit, should be a driveway as noted on county gis records. These have been fixed by another contributor. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. ... |
| 160899856 by thepurplemaids @ 2025-01-02 10:12 | 1 | 2025-01-07 15:47 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.the majority of tags do not even come close to OSM standards. Reverting\... |
| 161027974 by hbifn @ 2025-01-05 16:39 | 1 | 2025-01-06 03:34 | Glassman | You changed landuse=residential to landuse=grass then in the next changeset you deleted all of the landuse areas. Can you add the lanuse back? Let me know if you need help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161027974 |
| 2 | 2025-01-06 03:34 | Glassman | You changed landuse=residential to landuse=grass then in the next changeset you deleted all of the landuse areas. Can you add the landuse back? Let me know if you need help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161027974 | |
| 161039486 by lancyboi @ 2025-01-05 23:17 | 1 | 2025-01-06 03:21 | Glassman | I noticed you are adding farmland which is great, but typically farmland doesn't have a name, such as field 1. Also, farmland should only cover the crop area, and not the farm yard. Farm yards are tagged as landuse=farmyard. The trees you mapped as landuse=forest, is likely just natural=woo... |
| 160460033 by JumpingFluff @ 2024-12-21 07:17 | 1 | 2025-01-05 23:42 | Glassman | OSM spells out street names. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you please restore the names of all the street you changed? Thanks Glassman |
| 2 | 2025-01-06 01:52 | JumpingFluff ♦1 | Working on that, read earlier in the wiki that names should be written as posted will have them reverted by 00:00 06/01/2025 CST (Midnight) | |
| 160380592 by JumpingFluff @ 2024-12-19 07:35 | 1 | 2025-01-05 23:37 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.I see you changed the name in a subsequent edit. Thanks. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160380592 |
| 160892407 by Secure Computer Solutions @ 2025-01-02 04:05 | 1 | 2025-01-05 18:55 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. please read the wiki on how to add your business to OSM. You might want... |
| 160848919 by Evan Oshan @ 2024-12-31 21:52 | 1 | 2025-01-01 20:13 | Glassman | The location is in a parking lot. Is the actual location just to the north in the Carrara building?Also, is the office really open 24/7? |
| 160838828 by Oregonian3 @ 2024-12-31 15:50 | 1 | 2024-12-31 21:30 | Glassman | Why all the road upgrading? For example looks like a residential or unclassified road according to OSM classification system. A tertiary is defined as one that links smaller towns and villages. Can you explain your reasoning? --- Published using OSMCha: https:... |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 00:53 | Oregonian3 ♦47 | The most up to date guidance for classifying US roads is located here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance, and this page states that "Lower classification [secondary or lower] levels should be applied to roads based on their relative importan... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-01 19:37 | Glassman | Thanks for the info and yes I'm aware of the wiki page. But can you explain why West Barlett Road was upgraded from residential to Tertiary? It doesn't have a shoulder and just has the default county speed limit. And that is just one example of my concern. Can I suggest you discuss the... | |
| 160840727 by psnideriii @ 2024-12-31 16:37 | 1 | 2024-12-31 21:27 | Glassman | Bing street side imagery doesn't show a gate. Where is it located? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160840727 |
| 2 | 2024-12-31 22:57 | psnideriii ♦1 | It is located on the entrance from Village green drive. You can see it on google street view. On Bing street view it is there but hard to see with the glare. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-31 23:28 | Glassman | Thanks - It possible that Bing image is older and the gate installed later. | |
| 155676132 by eerib @ 2024-08-24 00:10 | 1 | 2024-12-31 18:04 | Glassman | The DWG received a request to remove the Taint trail for being very unsafe. Another user agreed that it is very unsafe. Since you added this trail, would you agree that it should be removed? |
| 2 | 2024-12-31 19:41 | eerib ♦100 | Hello GlassmanConsidering all of the information provided below, the ground truth policy, and best practices for user safety, I am strongly against the removal of this trail.---I have had conversations with two users regarding this trail.---User "dalbertlebrun" had prev... | |
| 160804382 by Glassman @ 2024-12-30 18:46 | 1 | 2024-12-31 13:40 | CurlingMan13 ♦2,040 | Looks like some railway tags were left on an orchard relation line:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479388316 |
| 2 | 2024-12-31 17:23 | Glassman | Looks like AwFi removed those tags. I may have to revisit the revert perl script to see why it doesn't remove everything. Thanks for the heads up. | |
| 160777708 by oxarcspokane @ 2024-12-30 06:43 | 1 | 2024-12-31 03:08 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published ... |
| 160769738 by Tranistman:3 @ 2024-12-29 22:11 | 1 | 2024-12-31 03:06 | Glassman | Bus stops are very detailed. route_ref should be the bus route number, not usually a string like "Stream Community Line" Can you review this edit and fix it. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:route_ref and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop for more inform... |
| 155987663 by dalbertlebrun @ 2024-08-30 18:45 | 1 | 2024-12-30 19:10 | Glassman | The DWG received a request that we remove this trail from OSM since it is very dangerous to use. Are you very knowledgeable about the Taint trail? Should it be in OSM? Is it usable? |
| 2 | 2024-12-31 07:57 | dalbertlebrun ♦1 | I have hiked it a number of times. It is indeed quite dangerous. It involves scrambling over loose rocks in the summer and in the winter it enters high avalanche risk terrain. I do not believe it should be on widely publicly used maps. | |
| 160651215 by grozog @ 2024-12-26 19:47 | 1 | 2024-12-30 00:25 | Glassman | Αντί να διαγράφετε και να προσθέτετε ξανά κτίρια ή άλλα χαρα&kappa... |
| 160730353 by petey610 @ 2024-12-28 21:16 | 1 | 2024-12-29 03:06 | Glassman | I would suggest using imagery that is more recent. ESRI World Imagery (Clarity) is fairly old. While often better resolution, it may be outdated. In Washington State I typically use Bing imagery since it is good quality and relatively recent. ESRI World Imagery is typically newer but the quality usu... |
| 160249960 by petey610 @ 2024-12-13 15:07 | 1 | 2024-12-29 02:58 | Glassman | Please consider leaving changeset comments that help you and other mappers understand what you are editing. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more info. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160249960 ... |
| 160667522 by oxarcsunnyside @ 2024-12-27 09:31 | 1 | 2024-12-29 01:12 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published ... |
| 160634965 by oxarcokanogan @ 2024-12-26 12:26 | 1 | 2024-12-28 01:01 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published ... |
| 160622909 by Rob Berg @ 2024-12-26 04:32 | 1 | 2024-12-26 19:56 | Glassman | Why did you move the address node to the other side of the street? According to the county records it belongs at the original location. I've moved it back. If that is wrong please let me know. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1606... |
| 160593624 by bradgillespie @ 2024-12-25 05:57 | 1 | 2024-12-25 15:19 | Glassman | Why did you remove these driveways if they exist? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160593624 |
| 160551536 by private_osm @ 2024-12-23 19:42 | 1 | 2024-12-25 01:29 | Glassman | I've mapped a lot of sidewalks but I haven't heard of mvpathways. Do you know what it is? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160551536 |
| 160513894 by blueblistering barnacles @ 2024-12-22 19:58 | 1 | 2024-12-23 20:48 | Glassman | Is the name you change to, Intercityy Transit Walk N' Roll, correct with the two "y"s in intercity? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160513894 |
| 2 | 2024-12-23 21:01 | blueblistering barnacles ♦2 | OMG no, I'm so sorry. I mistyped; thank you for noticing!! | |
| 160515184 by blueblistering barnacles @ 2024-12-22 20:49 | 1 | 2024-12-23 20:46 | Glassman | Stop signs typically require a direction tag if it isn't a four way stop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop for help with adding the direction tag. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160515184 |
| 2 | 2024-12-23 21:08 | blueblistering barnacles ♦2 | Thank you; added direction tags! | |
| 160514692 by blueblistering barnacles @ 2024-12-22 20:27 | 1 | 2024-12-23 20:43 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160514692 |
| 160541781 by Samuel Ackon @ 2024-12-23 15:06 | 1 | 2024-12-23 16:38 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160541781 |
| 160436375 by David P Chassin @ 2024-12-20 14:36 | 1 | 2024-12-22 20:21 | Glassman | According to the county, there are a bunch of different names of these streets. See https://scopi.snoco.org/Html5Viewer/Index.html?configBase=https://scopi.snoco.org/Geocortex/Essentials/REST/sites/SCOPI/viewers/SCOPI/virtualdirectory/Resources/Config/DefaultI went ahead and updated the street n... |
| 160444252 by RPhlegm @ 2024-12-20 18:12 | 1 | 2024-12-21 17:06 | Glassman | Orcas Island Rowing doesn't sound like a fitness center. Would social_facility=club + club=rowing be more appropriate? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160444252 |
| 2 | 2024-12-21 18:35 | RPhlegm ♦1 | it is not a social_facility; I was trying to match it to the rowing clubs in Seattle (e.g. Lake Washington Rowing Club, George Pocock Memorial Rowing Center) | |
| 3 | 2024-12-21 19:40 | Glassman | I remember the rowing club on Lake Union. Used to walk past it when walking around lake union. It's tagged as leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3374360814 | |
| 160448010 by Matthew Wynn @ 2024-12-20 20:03 | 1 | 2024-12-21 17:10 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160448010 |
| 160448482 by Matthew Wynn @ 2024-12-20 20:20 | 1 | 2024-12-21 17:10 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160448482 |
| 160456573 by cjwatson324 @ 2024-12-21 02:40 | 1 | 2024-12-21 02:44 | NeisBot ♦2,168 | Hi cjwatson324, welcome to OSM!Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:- 36 landuse(')Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred b... |
| 2 | 2024-12-21 03:25 | Glassman | I'm curious why you deleted these fields. And also their names Canary, joubert, and Fletcher. Are these their actual name or the owners name? If they are the owners name, we don't add personal information unless it is a posted sign. Please let me know. --- ... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-21 14:14 | cjwatson324 ♦1 | The names are the owners names. I removed the fields because of a separate program used to help generate maps for Farming Simulator did not see the fields. I wanted to redo the fields one at a time to see if that would help. When redone I will leave the name out. | |
| 4 | 2024-12-23 07:56 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,391 | Thank you for your private message on December 21 and the confirmation that the deletion was intentional. | |
| 160455485 by cjwatson324 @ 2024-12-21 01:39 | 1 | 2024-12-21 03:22 | Glassman | #TIP: OSM does not use descriptive names such as name=Woods" Is North Woods what the large area of woods are actually named?Can you review this edit. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160455485 |
| 160318802 by Samuel Robbins @ 2024-12-17 19:48 | 1 | 2024-12-18 16:14 | Glassman | classifying the canal road as a primary seems like a stretch. At best it is highway=service. The county doesn't even have it on it's basemaps. See https://matterhornwab.co.pierce.wa.us/publicgis/Can you please correct? --- Published using OSMCha:... |
| 2 | 2024-12-21 01:26 | Glassman | Since you didn't fix it, I have changed it to a service road that it appears to be. Let me know if you have any questions. | |
| 160408106 by Pookie69 @ 2024-12-19 19:39 | 1 | 2024-12-20 19:46 | Glassman | Please don't vandalize OSM. Your edit has been removed. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160408106 |
| 160407705 by toburu @ 2024-12-19 19:27 | 1 | 2024-12-20 19:42 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160407705 |
| 160419822 by toburu @ 2024-12-20 06:26 | 1 | 2024-12-20 19:39 | Glassman | The way added seems more like a highway=track. Unclassified basically is a rural residential street. Can you review this edit? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160419822 |
| 2 | 2024-12-20 20:04 | toburu ♦1 | Done | |
| 160413988 by mtsgis @ 2024-12-19 23:26 | 1 | 2024-12-20 01:24 | Glassman | You might want to use a more recent imagery like the Bing imagery. It's a high quality and years more recent than the esri clarity. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160413988 |
| 160379109 by WORN - Ben @ 2024-12-19 06:34 | 1 | 2024-12-19 18:54 | Glassman | You added a couple of fords on the South Fork Fortune Creek but the stream was shown to go through a colvert. If the culvert is there, then the ford should be remove, else the culvert should be removed. Since you are familiar with this area, can you review your edit? --- ... |
| 2 | 2024-12-19 18:57 | Glassman | $TIP: save and upload your edits before moving on to a more distant location. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160379109 | |
| 160325803 by EulersNumber2010 @ 2024-12-17 22:42 | 1 | 2024-12-18 16:21 | Glassman | Ideally this construction landuse should be changed to leisure=playgound instead of deleting the polygon area. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160325803 |
| 159758796 by Angry_Tau @ 2024-11-29 22:32 | 1 | 2024-12-17 18:35 | emersonveenstra ♦1,457 | Hi there,This changeset (and previous changesets from this import) created about 200 untagged nodes. The overpass query to find them is https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1VO9Could you go through and either tag them or remove them if they are duplicates? Thanks! |
| 2 | 2024-12-17 19:11 | Glassman | Looks like duplicate buildings from the small area I looked at. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-19 06:42 | Angry_Tau ♦2 | Hi!Thanks for pointing it out, I have corrected my mistake there; I believe I just neglected to complete the JOSM validation (these duplicate ways and building nodes are sometimes created by the Conflation plugin).Please see my changeset at: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160379229 | |
| 160266829 by Carlos Carvallo @ 2024-12-14 02:07 | 1 | 2024-12-14 18:42 | Glassman | #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time unabbrevating. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160266829 |
| 160260675 by Keeks_bruce @ 2024-12-13 20:23 | 1 | 2024-12-14 18:36 | Glassman | There are two existing roudabouts to the east and west of your addition. Is that what you are talking about? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160260675 |
| 2 | 2024-12-14 18:37 | Glassman | There are two existing roudabouts to the east and west of your addition. Is that what you are talking about? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160260675 | |
| 160266779 by TonooX @ 2024-12-14 02:03 | 1 | 2024-12-14 03:36 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.Please do not vandalize OSM by adding features that do not exist on the ... |
| 160192281 by The_YGB @ 2024-12-12 04:16 | 1 | 2024-12-13 16:10 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,391 | And? |
| 2 | 2024-12-13 18:57 | Glassman | removed beach tag | |
| 3 | 2024-12-14 07:15 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,391 | Thank for your revert @Glassmanhttps://osm.org/changeset/160258394 | |
| 73680625 by Omnific @ 2019-08-23 18:52 | 1 | 2024-12-09 23:39 | Glassman | Do you remember where you got the name, Alice Hotel, for the building on the corner of S King St and Maynard Ave S? DWG received a report that it should be Alps Hotel. The hotel is tagged properly as a node. I'm guessing the building was once the Alice Hotel. |
| 2 | 2024-12-12 02:13 | Omnific ♦202 | I was probably out walking the area, but there's a real possibility some note I made as I was walking got autocorrected and I unintentionally used that. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-12 02:49 | Glassman | There is a business Alices's Floral Designs there which does seem to imply the building may have been named Alice. I'm going to ask a friend that frequents the area if he knows or can find out. | |
| 160147961 by Brad M Johnson @ 2024-12-10 23:55 | 1 | 2024-12-12 01:14 | Glassman | Did you not understand my changeset comment about not adding parcel polygons as houses? Let me know how I can help. |
| 160110951 by Brad M Johnson @ 2024-12-09 23:56 | 1 | 2024-12-10 16:40 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.These look more like parcels that houses and we don't add parcel ar... |
| 160110923 by Brad M Johnson @ 2024-12-09 23:54 | 1 | 2024-12-10 16:37 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published ... |
| 160110796 by Brad M Johnson @ 2024-12-09 23:45 | 1 | 2024-12-10 16:37 | Glassman | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published ... |
| 160087268 by Nicky226851338 @ 2024-12-09 10:56 | 1 | 2024-12-10 16:24 | Glassman | Welcome to OSM. OSM only allows features that can be seen which property lines can not be. The only exceptions are some administrative boundaries. You could add an address, but please, no personal information. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- ... |
| 160081331 by David Svab @ 2024-12-09 07:52 | 1 | 2024-12-09 18:38 | Glassman | The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft https://wiki.ope... |
| 2 | 2024-12-09 18:39 | Glassman | The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft https://wiki.ope... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-09 18:39 | Glassman | The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft https://wiki.ope... | |
| 4 | 2024-12-09 18:39 | Glassman | The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft https://wiki.ope... | |
| 5 | 2024-12-09 18:39 | Glassman | The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft https://wiki.ope... | |
| 6 | 2024-12-09 18:39 | Glassman | The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft https://wiki.ope... | |
| 7 | 2024-12-09 18:39 | Glassman | The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft https://wiki.ope... | |
| 8 | 2024-12-09 18:39 | Glassman | The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft https://wiki.ope... | |
| 9 | 2024-12-09 18:39 | Glassman | The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft https://wiki.ope... | |
| 10 | 2024-12-09 18:39 | Glassman | The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft https://wiki.ope... | |
| 11 | 2024-12-11 18:25 | David Svab ♦1 | done | |
| 160069209 by widow slusher @ 2024-12-08 20:24 | 1 | 2024-12-09 18:24 | Glassman | #TIP: OSM considers driveway private by the nature of their use so we don't tag it as private unless there is a non-trespassing sign or gate. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160069209 |
| 160068378 by Verbowski @ 2024-12-08 19:49 | 1 | 2024-12-09 18:11 | Glassman | 86th Avenue Northeast actually continues to where it turns into the section of road that ends in the cul-de-sac. I went ahead and fix it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160068378 |
| 160068282 by Verbowski @ 2024-12-08 19:46 | 1 | 2024-12-09 18:09 | Glassman | These are considered highway=service + service=driveway. I made the change. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160068282 |
| 160068254 by Verbowski @ 2024-12-08 19:44 | 1 | 2024-12-09 18:09 | Glassman | These are considered highway=service + service=driveway. I made the change. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160068254 |
| 160039958 by TrevenBarry2 @ 2024-12-07 21:13 | 1 | 2024-12-09 03:25 | Glassman | Instead of connecting the path to the parking lot, it's better to connect it to the road to allow routing to the final destination. Can you fix? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160039958 |
| 160040809 by TrevenBarry2 @ 2024-12-07 21:53 | 1 | 2024-12-09 03:23 | Glassman | what is unpaved=pathway tag? I could not find it in the wiki. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160040809 |
| 160045052 by MitchellSternke @ 2024-12-08 03:29 | 1 | 2024-12-09 03:18 | Glassman | Why the foot=private tag? Isn't this open to anyone to walk? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160045052 |
| 2 | 2024-12-09 03:18 | Glassman | Why the foot=private tag? Isn't this open to anyone to walk? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160045052 | |
| 3 | 2024-12-09 03:18 | Glassman | Why the foot=private tag? Isn't this open to anyone to walk? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160045052 | |
| 4 | 2024-12-09 03:18 | Glassman | Why the foot=private tag? Isn't this open to anyone to walk? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160045052 | |
| 5 | 2024-12-09 03:18 | Glassman | Why the foot=private tag? Isn't this open to anyone to walk? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160045052 | |
| 160005762 by Caroline Joy Bell @ 2024-12-06 18:51 | 1 | 2024-12-07 21:41 | Glassman | I added the city and unit number to the address --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160005762 |
| 159972729 by Divelbiss @ 2024-12-05 21:04 | 1 | 2024-12-07 01:31 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972729 |
| 2 | 2024-12-07 01:31 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972729 | |
| 159972413 by Divelbiss @ 2024-12-05 20:51 | 1 | 2024-12-07 01:31 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972413 |
| 159935765 by SamanthaFerrell @ 2024-12-04 22:32 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:54 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159935765 |
| 159935714 by SamanthaFerrell @ 2024-12-04 22:29 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:54 | Glassman | Typically these instructions are added as a node to the road. Nothing wrong with this but it isn't all that useful. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159935714 |
| 159935663 by SamanthaFerrell @ 2024-12-04 22:27 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:53 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159935663 |
| 159935608 by SamanthaFerrell @ 2024-12-04 22:24 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:52 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159935608 |
| 159973752 by Crosby J Harris @ 2024-12-05 21:41 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:51 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159973752 |
| 159934666 by Crosby J Harris @ 2024-12-04 21:39 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:51 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934666 |
| 159972910 by Abe B @ 2024-12-05 21:10 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:50 | Glassman | School bus stops aren't really public transport platforms. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972910 |
| 159934662 by Abe B @ 2024-12-04 21:39 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:48 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934662 |
| 2 | 2024-12-06 22:48 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934662 | |
| 159972351 by Kamariwynne34 @ 2024-12-05 20:49 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:42 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972351 |
| 159934617 by Joseph MR @ 2024-12-04 21:38 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:41 | Glassman | The speed bump should be a node on the parking aisle. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934617 |
| 159934544 by Joseph MR @ 2024-12-04 21:35 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:40 | Glassman | We don't use descriptive names. Also, this looks more like landuse=grass. Can you review? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934544 |
| 159972424 by Quirap @ 2024-12-05 20:52 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:38 | Glassman | same issue as the gym. please fix --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972424 |
| 159972343 by Quirap @ 2024-12-05 20:49 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:37 | Glassman | Instead of drawing the gym area, just place a node where the gym is located. Also, we don't use descriptive names. Can you change the polygon to a node and remove the name? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972343 |
| 159934506 by Quirap @ 2024-12-04 21:34 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:35 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934506 |
| 159973901 by Lily Craft @ 2024-12-05 21:48 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:34 | Glassman | We don't use descriptive names in OSM. The tags are all that is needed unless it is formally named. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159973901 |
| 159972337 by Lily Craft @ 2024-12-05 20:49 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:33 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972337 |
| 159934471 by Lily Craft @ 2024-12-04 21:33 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:33 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934471 |
| 159972540 by Axen Akers @ 2024-12-05 20:57 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:31 | Glassman | In the future, just update the existing feature to save the history. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972540 |
| 159934670 by Kaia O @ 2024-12-04 21:40 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:29 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934670 |
| 159934488 by Kaia O @ 2024-12-04 21:33 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:29 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934488 |
| 159934386 by Kaia O @ 2024-12-04 21:29 | 1 | 2024-12-06 22:28 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.I would recommend using Bing imagery since it is more up to date --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934386 |
| 159934615 by Jo Hanson @ 2024-12-04 21:38 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:48 | Glassman | again, just a node showing a barrier and the type of barrier on the road. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934615 |
| 159934559 by Jo Hanson @ 2024-12-04 21:36 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:47 | Glassman | stop signs should be on the way with the direction based on the direction the way was drawn. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934559 |
| 159934374 by Jo Hanson @ 2024-12-04 21:29 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:46 | Glassman | A gate should just be a node on the road otherwise routers don't understand that a gate is in the path. Can you fix this? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934374 |
| 159972683 by Toaster_Oven:3 @ 2024-12-05 21:03 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:44 | Glassman | check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours for how to tag hours of operation and then could you update the opening_hours tag? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972683 |
| 159972286 by Toaster_Oven:3 @ 2024-12-05 20:47 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:43 | Glassman | No sense adding unknow or none to tags. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972286 |
| 159934368 by Toaster_Oven:3 @ 2024-12-04 21:29 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:42 | Glassman | We don't use descriptive names in OSM. Can you remove the name and add a tag to describe what 2-3 Trees is? If it is just the number of trees, then you could place a node for each tree. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934368... |
| 159972671 by Sophie Kristin @ 2024-12-05 21:02 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:39 | Glassman | Gardens are typically mapped as polygons. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972671 |
| 159972616 by Sophie Kristin @ 2024-12-05 21:00 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:39 | Glassman | again no descriptive names. Also we typically only add addresses to the house or main building. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972616 |
| 159972572 by Sophie Kristin @ 2024-12-05 20:58 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:37 | Glassman | We don't add personal information to OSM. I went ahead and removed the name from the house. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972572 |
| 159934656 by Sophie Kristin @ 2024-12-04 21:39 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:34 | Glassman | This node needs a tag. Although I'm not sure what a water pipe is so I'm unable to offer a suggestion. I did remove the node since it wasn't tagged. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934656 |
| 159934628 by Sophie Kristin @ 2024-12-04 21:38 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:34 | Glassman | This node needs a tag. Although I'm not sure what a water exit pipe is so I'm unable to offer a suggestion. I did remove the node since it wasn't tagged. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934628 |
| 159934546 by Sophie Kristin @ 2024-12-04 21:35 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:32 | Glassman | We don't use descriptive names. Instead of a polygon, I'd create a way and tagged it as natural=tree_row. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree_row --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934546 |
| 159934320 by Sophie Kristin @ 2024-12-04 21:27 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:30 | Glassman | power lines are not connect to streets. Can you review this edit and fix it. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power for more information on power lines --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934320 |
| 159972482 by Mykaela @ 2024-12-05 20:54 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:28 | Glassman | Again, no descritive names. I'm also not sure what exactly this is. It doesn't look like a typical running track. Can you review this contribution? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972482 |
| 159972400 by Mykaela @ 2024-12-05 20:51 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:27 | Glassman | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM. Can you remove the Bus Loop name if it isn't actually posted a such? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972400 |
| 159934455 by Mykaela @ 2024-12-04 21:32 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:25 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934455 |
| 2 | 2024-12-06 03:26 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934455 | |
| 3 | 2024-12-06 03:26 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934455 | |
| 159934260 by Mykaela @ 2024-12-04 21:25 | 1 | 2024-12-06 03:25 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934260 |
| 159930913 by HuyP @ 2024-12-04 19:10 | 1 | 2024-12-05 20:21 | Glassman | I don't think it is a building and craft=electrician would indicate people work in there. I'm guessing it is some sort of electrical box so maybe power=box? Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power --- Published using OSMCha: https://o... |
| 159968262 by HuyP @ 2024-12-05 18:37 | 1 | 2024-12-05 20:17 | Glassman | A tower is typically just a point (node) - can you fix? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159968262 |
| 159931050 by HuyP @ 2024-12-04 19:15 | 1 | 2024-12-05 20:16 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159931050 |
| 159967430 by HuyP @ 2024-12-05 18:20 | 1 | 2024-12-05 20:16 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159967430 |
| 2 | 2024-12-05 20:16 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159967430 | |
| 3 | 2024-12-05 20:16 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159967430 | |
| 159930977 by HuyP @ 2024-12-04 19:12 | 1 | 2024-12-05 20:15 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159930977 |
| 159930906 by KarinaRoz @ 2024-12-04 19:10 | 1 | 2024-12-05 20:12 | Glassman | We don't use descriptive names in OSM. Just tag the feature, for example, amenity=bench. Also, we don't use polygons for benches. This doesn't look like a bleacher. Can you review this edit? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes... |
| 159931131 by KarinaRoz @ 2024-12-04 19:18 | 1 | 2024-12-05 20:09 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159931131 |
| 159931056 by KarinaRoz @ 2024-12-04 19:15 | 1 | 2024-12-05 20:09 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159931056 |
| 159930876 by AraWh @ 2024-12-04 19:09 | 1 | 2024-12-05 20:08 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159930876 |
| 159901129 by mtsgis @ 2024-12-04 00:46 | 1 | 2024-12-04 17:58 | Glassman | The two trails you added don't connect to any streets or sidewalks which makes them un-routable. Are they connected to a street or sidewalk? If so can you connect them? Also, the Herons Nest Trail just ends in the middle of the woods. Is that correct? |
| 2 | 2024-12-05 00:20 | Mountains To Sound GIS ♦1 | I connected to street for routing | |
| 3 | 2024-12-05 01:11 | Glassman | Thanks - I see you changed your user name. Had me confused :)Thanks for fixing. | |
| 4 | 2024-12-05 01:18 | mtsgis ♦1 | Sure thing. I am updating trails and designing a map for a non-profit that develops and stewards trails in the Greenbelt | |
| 159903356 by mappingrh @ 2024-12-04 03:56 | 1 | 2024-12-04 18:03 | Glassman | again, name=Pool is redundant. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159903356 |
| 159903340 by mappingrh @ 2024-12-04 03:54 | 1 | 2024-12-04 18:02 | Glassman | How about building=tiny_house? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159903340 |
| 159903256 by mappingrh @ 2024-12-04 03:48 | 1 | 2024-12-04 18:00 | Glassman | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM. Just tag it as building=house. Can you fix? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159903256 |
| 159898815 by Jackson M1428 @ 2024-12-03 22:18 | 1 | 2024-12-04 17:49 | Glassman | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"Also, we typically only add addresses to the main buildings. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159898815 |
| 2 | 2024-12-04 17:51 | Glassman | The path you added near East Midway Road and North Little Spokane Drive should connect to the to roads. That allows routers to give directions to the path. Can you fix it? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159898815 | |
| 159898097 by openstreetshamp @ 2024-12-03 21:46 | 1 | 2024-12-04 17:46 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159898097 |
| 2 | 2024-12-04 17:46 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159898097 | |
| 159898032 by Gregir @ 2024-12-03 21:43 | 1 | 2024-12-04 17:45 | Glassman | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159898032 |
| 159855902 by noah flewelling @ 2024-12-02 19:09 | 1 | 2024-12-03 22:30 | Glassman | The background imagery you used is years old. I'd suggest using Bing. Fairly current and good resolution. You can pick the background imagery from the background icon on the right hand side of the editor.Also - we don't use descriptive names, just the tags will do.I went ahead and ... |
| 159855697 by Averyh @ 2024-12-02 19:02 | 1 | 2024-12-03 22:23 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.#TIP: the changeset comment should be a brief description of what the edit accomplished. For example - "add gate to road" --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://os... |
| 159855699 by Hansell Sophia @ 2024-12-02 19:02 | 1 | 2024-12-03 22:21 | Glassman | The crossing should not be connected to the landuse. You could just add a node to the street where the crossing is located or map the sidewalks as separate ways. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks. We have a work group doing just that to help pedestrians. --- ... |
| 159855658 by Alpha105 Cline @ 2024-12-02 19:01 | 1 | 2024-12-03 22:17 | Glassman | The height looks wrong. OSM defaults to meters, so this house would be 30 meters high which is almost 100 feet high, like a 10 story building. Can you fix it? All that is needed is to change it to 30 ft. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... |
| 159855650 by MMKB @ 2024-12-02 19:00 | 1 | 2024-12-03 22:14 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159855650 |
| 159855700 by MadeleineMorrison @ 2024-12-02 19:02 | 1 | 2024-12-03 22:13 | Glassman | The original building just needed the tag modified. Now the building is connected to the landuse area which it shouldn't be. Can you fix the building shape to match the roof line and disconnect it from the landuse polygon? Thanks --- Published using OSMCh... |
| 159855644 by MadeleineMorrison @ 2024-12-02 19:00 | 1 | 2024-12-03 22:10 | Glassman | #TIP: brief changeset comments are very helpful to others as well as yourself. Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for help writing good changeset comments. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159855644\... |
| 159855617 by Milad23 @ 2024-12-02 18:59 | 1 | 2024-12-03 22:07 | Glassman | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names, just tags. Can you remove the name=House? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159855617 |
| 159855612 by ColtonH4 @ 2024-12-02 18:59 | 1 | 2024-12-03 22:05 | Glassman | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM. The tag leisure=swimming_pool is sufficient. Can you remove the name tag? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159855612 |
| 159855667 by Josh Lochhead @ 2024-12-02 19:01 | 1 | 2024-12-03 22:04 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159855667 |
| 159855607 by Josh Lochhead @ 2024-12-02 18:59 | 1 | 2024-12-03 22:03 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159855607 |
| 159855602 by Matthew Osborne @ 2024-12-02 18:59 | 1 | 2024-12-03 22:00 | Glassman | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline, then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159855602 |
| 159855564 by Evan P the amazing cool person @ 2024-12-02 18:57 | 1 | 2024-12-03 21:59 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159855564 |
| 159855500 by rylanM @ 2024-12-02 18:55 | 1 | 2024-12-03 21:58 | Glassman | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159855500 |
| 159855696 by TIDWEB @ 2024-12-02 19:02 | 1 | 2024-12-03 21:56 | Glassman | It appears you moved a tree to the sidewalk which would likely cause a routing issue. Can you review this edit to move the tree to its location? |
| 2 | 2024-12-03 21:56 | Glassman | It appears you moved a tree to the sidewalk which would likely cause a routing issue. Can you review this edit to move the tree to its location? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159855696 | |
| 3 | 2024-12-03 21:57 | Glassman | It appears you moved a tree to the sidewalk which would likely cause a routing issue. Can you review this edit to move the tree to its location? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159855696 | |
| 159855483 by TIDWEB @ 2024-12-02 18:54 | 1 | 2024-12-03 21:53 | Glassman | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159855483 |