dieterdreist participated in the following changeset discussionsdieterdreist participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167631336 by Davlak @ 2025-06-14 22:49 | 1 | 2025-07-11 21:45 | dieterdreist | Ciao Davlak,ho visto che hai cambiato railway=stop in railway=station per una delle stop position di Villa Bonelli. In realtà quella non è una station ma un halt, il tag è railway=halt e non va sul binario (ce ne sono già 2 in realtà, con la tua aggiunta erano ... |
| 2 | 2025-07-11 21:51 | dieterdreist | Vedo ora anche la fermata Magliana cambiata da railway=halt a railway=station. Come anche Fiera di Roma, Parco Leonardo, Palmiro Togliatti, Tor Sapienza e Tor di Nona. Secondo le mie ricerche nessuna di queste è una stazione, non hanno deviatori.Saluti,Martin | |
| 168581636 by gigi2037 @ 2025-07-06 23:27 | 1 | 2025-07-11 21:24 | dieterdreist | Ciao Gigi2037, cosa vuol dire "invalid routes"? Ho notato che hai rimosso le stazioni mappate come aree che avevano il ruolo "stop", e creato doppini di stazioni ad esempio a Villa Bonelli,saluti,Martin |
| 2 | 2025-07-11 21:25 | dieterdreist | doppioni | |
| 3 | 2025-07-11 21:44 | gigi2037 ♦19 | https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=12.52904&lat=41.91728&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodesprova con osm inspector erano stazioni non fermate | |
| 55208597 by mcheckimport @ 2018-01-06 11:21 | 1 | 2025-07-06 14:51 | dieterdreist | Ciao, mi chiedevo cos’è la fonte per il nome Parco Savello? Per me non è nemmeno un leisure=park quella area |
| 168367138 by katherineherlihy @ 2025-07-01 18:51 | 1 | 2025-07-01 22:00 | dieterdreist | Please do not import arbitrary data without review, I noticed this footway does not meet the quality requirements we expect from contributions: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411242604it is not connected to anything, and an isolated sidewalk fragment like this is just pointless. |
| 2 | 2025-07-01 22:11 | ivanbranco ♦2,701 | Also, what's the meaning of #mapwithai-tm4-206? I tried searching it in the wiki but I got 0 results. The Organised Editing Guidelines say:"Changeset comments should include the unique hashtag described on the wiki page under Organised Editing/Activities/Name of the Activity (as descri... | |
| 3 | 2025-07-01 22:16 | ivanbranco ♦2,701 | Uhm ok, I think I found it: https://tasks.mapwith.ai/projects/206I had to search the hashtag in the wiki without the number. I still think a link to the Tasking manager in the changeset metadata would be helpful. Good mapping | |
| 4 | 2025-07-03 13:32 | dieterdreist | Yes, good mapping yes, but bad mapping no. The task has an "urgent" badge, how on earth could this be urgent? I don't think it should be delegated to beginners, because doing it right is not easy, you have to ensure connectivity and pay particular attention to crossings. Also sidewalk... | |
| 168365164 by katherineherlihy @ 2025-07-01 17:57 | 1 | 2025-07-01 22:02 | dieterdreist | also here, unconnected sidewalk island. |
| 168366420 by katherineherlihy @ 2025-07-01 18:29 | 1 | 2025-07-01 22:02 | dieterdreist | Here's the same issue as in the other changeset: the imported sidewalks are not connected to anything. |
| 160955173 by mpbin @ 2025-01-03 15:52 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-20 19:35 | dieterdreist | Ciao, ho visto che hai tolto la forma societaria dal operator (tolto SpA), non capisco perché, per me più precisione è meglio di meno precisione, e nel tag name c’era già OVS senza Spa |
| 166453960 by ine63 @ 2025-05-19 02:36 | 1 | 2025-05-22 06:35 | NeisReview ♦940 | #DataImportHi, welcome to OSM!With this changeset, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?Looking forward to hearing from you.... |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 00:08 | ine63 ♦4 | Hi! thank u for your message. The data in this changeset was mapped based on publicly available information provided by the Seoul Open Data Plaza.(https://data.seoul.go.kr/)Please feel free to reach out again if you have any further questions. Thank you. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 05:34 | NeisReview ♦940 | Thanks for your response. I think it would be helpful if the data source were mentioned in the changeset. Is the data's license compatible with OSM? | |
| 4 | 2025-06-20 13:43 | dieterdreist | IMHO the tag "amenity=retail shops" that was not in actual use before your import should not have been used. Are you aware of the import guidelines, did you follow them? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines | |
| 5 | 2025-06-20 14:16 | adreamy ♦56 | Please take this into consideration.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Korea_Open_Government_License | |
| 6 | 2025-06-20 15:04 | Jarek 🚲 ♦323 | Hello ine63,These changesets are being discussed on the Community Forum due to questions about the tags used (meaning of "retail shops") and potential license issues. Can you contribute, in English or in Korean? https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/recent-import-introduced-new-tag-ame... | |
| 167550386 by 9r8k @ 2025-06-12 20:17 | 1 | 2025-06-16 09:42 | dieterdreist | grazie per aver agito sulla questione, però non avresti dovuto cancellare il bagno del cafè, se esiste. Il modo più corretto è indicare che si tratta di un bagno per i clienti, con access=customers. Invece se la posizione del bagno era errata, la risposta giusta è ... |
| 2 | 2025-06-16 22:24 | 9r8k ♦3 | Va bene, ho spostato il bagno un po.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167715128PS: Was für ein lustiger Zufall, dass du ganz "dreist" auf Italienisch geantwortet hast, weil ich Spaß daran habe, Italienisch zu lernen. ;) | |
| 3 | 2025-06-17 07:23 | dieterdreist | Ich habe deshalb auf italienisch geantwortet weil mir nicht klar war dass du deutsch bist/sprichst, so dreist finde ich das nun nicht :) Bist du in Rom oder zu Besuch? Wir haben eine lokale Gruppe von Mappern die sich in der Vergangenheit gelegentlich getroffen hat, vielleicht könnte man das wi... | |
| 4 | 2025-06-19 10:53 | 9r8k ♦3 | Grazie per l'offerta ma sono stato a Roma solo per vacanza e per visitare un'amica chi viene da Roma. In bocca al lupo per la gruppa OSM di Roma! Sarebbe un po' triste se non ci fossero abbastanza persone chi si interessano di OSM in una città così grande. | |
| 85338672 by MarcoGonnash1992 @ 2020-05-17 15:28 | 1 | 2025-06-04 22:48 | dieterdreist | this comment doesn't make sense, the capital tag is about the status of the place, and if it is the capital of a level 6 entity the capital value has to be 6. Putting 8 is simply wrong. |
| 137550208 by ivanbranco @ 2023-06-20 08:11 | 1 | 2025-05-22 15:10 | dieterdreist | Mi sembra strano che questo sia la prima versione dell'obelisco, l'ho mappato 15 anni fa, nella versione attuale, il perimetro del basamento è inserito come obelisco, da verificare...https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1183619459/history/1 |
| 2 | 2025-05-22 17:35 | ivanbranco ♦2,701 | E' la prima versione dell'obelisco come area, prima era mappato come nodo. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 10:58 | dieterdreist | ma come area è troppo grande, è tutta la base ora, l’obelisco è molto più piccolo | |
| 4 | 2025-05-23 11:00 | dieterdreist | ecco la foto per illustrare il problemahttps://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obelisco_del_Pincio?uselang=en#/media/File%3AAntinous_obelisk_Rome.jpg | |
| 164582864 by RivalgoAV @ 2025-04-06 10:07 | 1 | 2025-05-21 15:46 | dieterdreist | Ciao RivalgoAV, ho notato che hai cambiato i tag della stop position: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7086593095ed era diventata una stazione su un binario, ma in questo caso abbiamo già la stazione mappata con la way 195133326. Ho già risolto, giusto per informazione.buona ma... |
| 163476933 by AlCeRoma @ 2025-03-11 09:55 | 1 | 2025-05-07 10:36 | dieterdreist | Ciao AlCe, ho visto che hai aggiunto il tag "amenity=animal_breeding" al ippodromo delle Capannelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18807059 (prima https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22875757 ). Siamo sicuri che quello è un buon abbinamento? Mi aspetterei piùttosto una ... |
| 2 | 2025-05-07 14:25 | AlCeRoma ♦9 | sì, meglio taggare separatamente le due aree! Sul tag più appropriato da usare per l'area delle stalle non so quale sia la soluzione migliore, forse "animal_breeding=*" ? 👉🏻 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity=animal%20breeding?uselang=it | |
| 3 | 2025-05-08 08:55 | dieterdreist | Per me `animal_breeding` non è da mettere in nessun modo ad un ippodromo, al meno che non ci sia attività di riproduzione. Se ci sono solo stalle non è animal breeding (covare animali). Si possono mappare le stalle dei cavalli come `building=stable`. | |
| 173897 by woodpeck @ 2006-12-28 11:40 | 1 | 2023-10-06 20:30 | Stereo ♦359 | Welcome aboard woodpeck!Your additions help making the map more accurate and useful for everyone. There are two practices that can significantly enhance the quality of your contributions: providing clear changeset comments and maintaining a concise bounding box (bbox) for your changesets.Cha... |
| 2 | 2023-10-06 20:36 | woodpeck ♦2,431 | Hey Guillaume, thank you, I'm still getting the knack of this OSM thing. Can you show me where I enter the changeset comment? I have JSOM build 422 on Java SE5. Do I need to upgrade? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-07 09:31 | dieterdreist | if you don’t want to upgrade you should still patch your version so you can add these comments, but upgrading could likely save you some sweat and tears… | |
| 155239690 by mau59 @ 2024-08-14 12:57 | 1 | 2025-05-05 12:06 | dieterdreist | ciao mau59, ti segnalo che ripristino https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607644595/history che in questo changeset è stato sostituito con una nuova way senza gli attributi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307737499 |
| 2 | 2025-05-06 11:22 | mau59 ♦16 | Ti ringrazio dieterdreist! Un saluto | |
| 55375269 by dieterdreist @ 2018-01-12 09:54 | 1 | 2025-05-03 09:00 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,666 | Hello!You usedcuisine=bistroton https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5334698164/historyHave you maybe meantcuisine=bistro?I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).Or have you used ... |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 07:54 | dieterdreist | thank you, I fixed it. I somehow used French spelling… | |
| 128179715 by giorgio92 @ 2022-10-28 15:12 | 1 | 2025-04-30 11:26 | dieterdreist | ciao Giorgio, ho notato che hai inserito edifici con MapWithAI, che sono molto differenti rispetto a quello che si trova veramente lì, la forma è diversa. Ti chiedo di non farlo, se fosse possibile prendere e importare gli edifici che si ha sognato la AI di Microsoft, lo avremmo gi&a... |
| 2 | 2025-05-01 05:29 | giorgio92 ♦28 | Ciao,grazie della segnalazione, prima di usare lo strumento rapiD faccio sempre un check che gli edifici non siano troppo difformiSto cercando di usarlo sempre meno. | |
| 84589647 by GustavoE @ 2020-05-04 03:29 | 1 | 2025-04-30 07:40 | dieterdreist | Hi, also on this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332077972 you added that it is related to ancient egypt, please verify, thank you. |
| 2 | 2025-04-30 14:55 | GustavoE ♦16 | It's already corrected | |
| 113012435 by GustavoE @ 2021-10-26 22:16 | 1 | 2025-04-30 07:39 | dieterdreist | Hello, I noticed that you added this archaeological site as related to ancient egypt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9203454613/Frankly, I find it very improbable, can you please verify?Thank you,Martin |
| 63393543 by TWHB @ 2018-10-10 20:01 | 1 | 2025-04-26 19:43 | dieterdreist | Can you explain what you meant with this comment and why you deleted the quite old representation of the pedestrian area here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/309904/ |
| 74535008 by Janjko @ 2019-09-16 14:10 | 1 | 2025-04-26 19:39 | dieterdreist | Hi Janko, I think the colonnades should also be part of the square. Thank you for splitting square a pedestrian area though (unfortunately St. Peter’s Square is a back and forth due to the hundreds of mappers passing by every year/month) |
| 128782435 by Map47 @ 2022-11-11 15:38 | 1 | 2025-04-17 16:08 | dieterdreist | Ci sarà un motivo per aver "rimosso nomi" dalla piazza rappresentata con tag "highway"? Ora non c'è più un highway per piazza San Pietro. Ti chiederei di rimetterli, grazie. |
| 2 | 2025-04-17 18:29 | Map47 ♦35 | I nomi della piazza San Pietro sono inseriti nella relazione https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10044166 che comprende tutto anche l'area pedonale.La relazione https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7012828 definisce il tipo di superficie dell'area calpestabile della piazza, sei sicu... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-22 16:28 | dieterdreist | Sì, la piazza San Pietro viene rappresentata dal elemento place=square, ma per highway la regola è avere il nome su tutti i pezzi. Non va tolto. | |
| 4 | 2025-04-22 19:16 | Map47 ♦35 | Si tratta appunto di una piazza, li non c'è nessuna strada, c'è la superficie pedonale della piazza che non ha un nome. In questo caso risulta più che mai opportuno non duplicare il nome della piazza alla superficie pedonale viste le numerose traduzioni del nome.Prim... | |
| 5 | 2025-04-23 13:55 | dieterdreist | Non sono d'accordo, è sempre opportuno mettere i nomi alle highway (se lo hanno). Se si tratta di "una piazza con nessuna strada", si potrebbe ipotizzare di cancellare le highway (ma non è la soluzione solita, dove si accettano questi percorsi "virtuali"). C�... | |
| 6 | 2025-04-23 16:42 | Map47 ♦35 | Appunto quelle "highway" non hanno nome. Quell'area pedonale é solo una parte della piazza, ne sono escluse le fontane e l'obelisco, quindi non é giusto chiamarla "Piazza San Pietro" evitando oltretutto una duplicazione di nomi non necessaria.In generale... | |
| 7 | 2025-04-24 08:31 | dieterdreist | è quasi sempre così per le highway, non rappresentano quasi mai “tutta” la strada, invece ogni pezzo ottiene il nome della strada e insieme sono la strada, e per le piazze è la stessa cosa. | |
| 8 | 2025-04-24 12:00 | ppku ♦6 | Ciao dalla chat. Le strade carrabili in Italia prendono il nome ufficiale dalla piazza, se non ne hanno uno proprio. Ma non è una regola di OSM, e questo caso non è una strada carrabile.Per quanto riguarda OSM, name è quello usato dalle persone per riferirsi all'oggetto... | |
| 9 | 2025-04-24 12:58 | dieterdreist | esiste anche una discussione nel merito dove si conferma di non togliere i nomi:https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/names-of-ways-within-squares-what-is-official-mapping-practise/94200/2 | |
| 10 | 2025-04-24 13:00 | dieterdreist | riferito a ppku: secondo te se chiedi una persona che si trova in questa area il nome, ti dirà “non ha nome” oppure “Piazza San Pietro”? | |
| 11 | 2025-04-24 13:47 | ppku ♦6 | @dieterdreist Ma quel forum thread parla di strade. Map47 non ha toccato i foot path. Questo changeset tocca AREE pedonali. Per favore verifica su achavi https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128782435 | |
| 12 | 2025-04-24 13:51 | ppku ♦6 | @dieterdreist Vedi che non c'è nella cronologia dihttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535197898https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535197913 | |
| 13 | 2025-04-25 12:02 | Map47 ♦35 | @dieterdreist Hai esordito chiedendo la motivazione della rimozione del none dall'area pedonale.Hai ricevuto motivazioni logiche; non sono andate perse informazioni, sono stati rimossi dati duplicati.In particolare possiamo dire che:Sappiamo dove ci troviamo, grazie a place=square, ne con... | |
| 14 | 2025-04-25 17:15 | dieterdreist | prova di fare il routing e vedrai che non funziona nel senso che le indicazioni testuali ti diranno di usare strade senza nome, perché i motori di routing si aspettano di avere il nome sulla highway. Non è una mia idea personale di ripetere i nomi su tutte le highway, lo facciamo ovu... | |
| 15 | 2025-04-25 18:44 | Map47 ♦35 | Quello che segnali è un problema della applicazione del routing usato.Se vuoi mappare per il routing puoi dare un nome a tutte le highway=footway della piazza. | |
| 16 | 2025-04-26 19:32 | dieterdreist | questo non sarebbe quello che si intende con “mappare per il routing” e sarebbe corretto, concordo. | |
| 17 | 2025-04-26 19:33 | dieterdreist | non è un problema di una specifica applicazione, è il comportamento di tutte le applicazioni (che conosco), perché si aspettano che i mappatori rispettino le convenzioni (mettere i nomi agli highway) | |
| 18 | 2025-04-26 19:41 | Map47 ♦35 | OK! Allora buona mappatura | |
| 136963163 by Map47 @ 2023-06-05 09:23 | 1 | 2025-04-22 16:33 | dieterdreist | Ciao,ho trovato questa area https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15951998 che mi sembra creata da te, ma non ne sono del tutto certo (forse hai solo risolto un problema geometrico). Mi sembra strano una area pedonale perché il centro storico è ZTL e le macchine ci vanno. |
| 2 | 2025-04-22 19:26 | Map47 ♦35 | Salve,Confermo che non ho creato l'area pedonale, ho solo risolto l'uso non conforme del multipoligono per definire questa area. | |
| 165168017 by CaptainCrunch @ 2025-04-19 19:16 | 1 | 2025-04-20 17:36 | dieterdreist | bitte verwende changeset comments die deine Bearbeitungen beschreiben:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_commentsDanke |
| 156654383 by CarloCesarini @ 2024-09-15 16:04 | 1 | 2025-04-17 15:29 | dieterdreist | Ciao Carlo,ti segnalo che le altezze delle cime si inseriscono nel tag "ele" e non in "name". In "name" ci vanno solo i nomi. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12178584517Saluti e buona mappatura,Martin |
| 97781708 by vlattanzi @ 2021-01-19 16:37 | 1 | 2025-04-17 15:16 | dieterdreist | Ciao, mi sono accorto che le altezze delle colline sono inserite sia col tag "ele" che con "name", così si creano problemi (doppia indicazione). Sto già provvedendo dove l'ho visto, ma se trovi altri ti invito aiutarmi nel cancellare i "name" che non ... |
| 2 | 2025-04-17 15:37 | ivanbranco ♦2,701 | Ce ne sono un po' in Italia: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/22u9Ho notato anche 39 peak il cui nome inizia con "Quota", es. "Quota 3065": https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/22ub | |
| 154954846 by dieterdreist @ 2024-08-07 21:37 | 1 | 2025-04-15 16:27 | Robot8A ♦69 | I fixed the location of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12097804039 on changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164993657 |
| 2 | 2025-04-16 08:42 | dieterdreist | great, thank you! | |
| 69385303 by GBAB @ 2019-04-19 18:39 | 1 | 2025-04-08 11:51 | dieterdreist | Please do not trust Osmose. It is not a fix to retag amenity=swimming_pool to leisure=swimming_pool, because the latter is a swimming pool, but in this case, the area describes the whole grounds, not just the pool. |
| 135091915 by Claudio Tam @ 2023-04-19 08:31 | 1 | 2025-04-04 09:57 | dieterdreist | Ciao Claudio, ho notato che hai riclassificato i canali in questa zona da "drain" (corrente d'acqua artificiale con bordi costruiti, per drenaggio) a "canal" (corrente d'acqua artificiale che porta acqua "utile" per trasporto o irrigazione). E`stato fatto appo... |
| 2 | 2025-04-05 15:23 | Claudio Tam ♦20 | Ciao!I principi che usai erano questi. Quelli con larghezza d'acqua più piccola (0-3 metri) sono "drain", non contengono abbastanza acqua per essere usati per coltivare, spesso sono quasi-vuoti. Stanno a un livello un po' più basso.Quelli più grandi (larg... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-07 21:37 | dieterdreist | Ciao Claudio, grazie per la risposta. Capisco il criterio, anche se credo si potrebbe un po' alzare i limiti, 2 m per un "canale" non sono molti, ma non c'è nemmeno una chiara definizione, quindi per il momento potremmo anche lasciarli.CiaoMartin | |
| 164477683 by vlattanzi @ 2025-04-03 18:03 | 1 | 2025-04-04 09:27 | dieterdreist | Ciao Vlattanzi, ti segnalo che ieri hai rotto il multipoligono 12346352, (wood), l'ho già riparato. (ammetto che le strutture non sono proprio chiarissime in questo punto, quindi purtroppo è facile che si rompino senza che uno si accorge).Saluti e buona mappatura,Martin |
| 2 | 2025-04-04 09:43 | dieterdreist | E anche la 16378473 (wood), già riparata... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-07 12:11 | vlattanzi ♦4 | Grazie | |
| 161760953 by kguenther24 @ 2025-01-25 20:58 | 1 | 2025-03-31 08:43 | dieterdreist | Hi, I just noticed you wholesale deleted the square to redraw it from scratch: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=161760953This is not our usual procedure, because it makes it difficult to understand the history and there is the risk that details are forgotten / lost. E.g. you have deleted ... |
| 2 | 2025-03-31 08:54 | dieterdreist | there is also no justification of "access=no" for this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161760953(generally, you can just walk from the station along the fence of the hotel up to Viale Enrico di Nicola, there are not restrictions at all).I do not recall 100% if the taxi access ... | |
| 3 | 2025-03-31 08:55 | dieterdreist | sorry, the link for the previous comment is this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141859892 | |
| 4 | 2025-03-31 14:06 | kguenther24 ♦23 | Hi, I apologize for those few errors, I updated the access tag on the taxi area and moved the fountain node to its real location so it is not located nearly on the roadway (that is why I had thought it had been removed during the area's reconstruction). As to why there was a lot of deletion inv... | |
| 5 | 2025-04-02 11:23 | dieterdreist | Thank you for replying. I just found it puzzling that you deleted an item to which I had added a picture literally the day before. This is the kind of risk I was writing about, when doing a wholesale replacement, because vivid places like this are not uniformally "outdated", there are like... | |
| 6 | 2025-04-02 11:27 | dieterdreist | you also deleted this private parking:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182282757I think it is still there, as is this road:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107256116 | |
| 7 | 2025-04-02 11:30 | dieterdreist | and also these:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390214037https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390214037and so on, these are not part of Piazza delle 500 | |
| 122207640 by Sammamish @ 2022-06-10 11:55 | 1 | 2025-03-27 17:21 | dieterdreist | Hi Sammamish, can you explain why you changed the classification? From aerial imagery this looks like a track... |
| 2 | 2025-03-28 16:06 | Sammamish ♦4 | Hi dieterdreist,Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. | |
| 3 | 2025-04-01 14:31 | Sammamish ♦4 | Hi dieterdreist, Thank you for your question. I referred to Maxar Premium Imagery for these changes in 2022. However, in the latest Esri World Imagery it does look more like a track as you suggest. I also see that the way it is connected to at the east end has been re-tagged to track which appears t... | |
| 4 | 2025-04-02 08:09 | dieterdreist | Thank you for replying. Frankly, I believe we shouldn't reclassify roads or paths based on aerial imagery, in particular not change the class someone, possibly with on the ground knowledge, has already assigned. Imagery is always old (compared to "now"), and it can be misleading. | |
| 5 | 2025-04-02 08:10 | dieterdreist | thank you for fixing it | |
| 161761613 by kguenther24 @ 2025-01-25 21:21 | 1 | 2025-03-31 09:18 | dieterdreist | Hi, I also do not understand why you created this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354263529 |
| 160961225 by GBAB @ 2025-01-03 18:24 | 1 | 2025-03-16 17:52 | dieterdreist | Hi, IMHO this is vandalism, you cannot delete several aspects of the Piazza Navona (the square and the pedestrian area) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9202510/https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5150439/without asking anybody, on your mobile phone, and add some more tags to a way http... |
| 2 | 2025-03-17 10:09 | GBAB ♦101 | Dear / Carissimo / Lieber dieterdreist,thank you for you message.Just to understand each other:The problem is that the area of the three fountains of Piazza Navona seem paved on OSM (together with the rest of the square)?Thank you!Gábor | |
| 3 | 2025-03-17 12:33 | dieterdreist | Dear Gábor, yes, the problem is you conflated the square with the pedestrian area | |
| 4 | 2025-03-17 12:34 | dieterdreist | btw also at Campo de‘ Fiori | |
| 5 | 2025-03-17 12:54 | GBAB ♦101 | Dear dieterdreist,yes, you are right. What I have done is that I merged the two Piazza Navonas and two Campos into one, since also in real life there is one of them (as far as I can remember from my last stay in Rome some weeks ago). ;-)I thought that the fountains and the statue of Giordano... | |
| 6 | 2025-03-17 15:08 | dieterdreist | Hi,I agree that it is not vandalism, as you have acted in good faith, although I believe if someone wants to restructure the representation of a landmark, which both squares are, and they are in higher two digit version numbers, just ironing over is not what should be done, e.g. you could have wri... | |
| 7 | 2025-03-17 19:37 | dieterdreist | I am sure we need a distinct square and a distinct highway area object, because the fountains and statues are part of the square but not of the highway. | |
| 8 | 2025-03-18 20:30 | GBAB ♦101 | Dear dieterdreist,now there are two distinct features on both piazze: one of a pedestrian highway and on of a square with the appropriate distinction of tagging:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163791363CheersGábor | |
| 9 | 2025-03-18 20:32 | GBAB ♦101 | …and another question: is there any hierarchy between editing software? E.g. is an edit more valueable if it is done with e.g. iD than it would be by JOSM? Or vice versa? | |
| 10 | 2025-03-21 23:08 | dieterdreist | no, it is not about a hierarchy, but in general I would suspect a mobile editor to give less overview, just because of the screen size, it is not a hard criterion, you probably can do everything on a small screen as well, it just seems easier to overlook something when dealing with situations like p... | |
| 163795200 by clt2025 @ 2025-03-18 22:39 | 1 | 2025-03-20 07:55 | NeisReview ♦940 | #UnexplainedChanges #TestHello, welcome to OSM.Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?Looking forward to your response. Thank you. |
| 2 | 2025-03-20 16:14 | clt2025 ♦1 | Die Erstellung eines OpenStreetMap (OSM)-Kontos und die Durchführung eines Tests zur Bearbeitung und Präsentation von Edits auf dem Chemnitzer Linuxtag (CLT) sind ein bedeutender Schritt, um sowohl das Potenzial der OpenStreetMap-Plattform als auch die vielfältigen Möglichkeiten ... | |
| 3 | 2025-03-21 07:37 | NeisReview ♦940 | Hallo clt2025,vielen Dank für die ausführliche Erklärung und den Kontext zu euren Edits im Rahmen des Chemnitzer Linuxtags. Es freut mich sehr zu sehen, wie ihr OpenStreetMap als praxisorientiertes und pädagogisches Werkzeug nutzt, um die Community und das Verständnis f&... | |
| 4 | 2025-03-21 07:39 | NeisReview ♦940 | PS: Die Antwort wurde ebenfalls mit einer generativen KI erstellt. 🤷♂️ | |
| 5 | 2025-03-21 13:33 | dieterdreist | KI-generierte Sprachmodelle sollten in Diskussionssystemen, die für menschliche Leser gedacht sind, nicht verwendet werden, da sie oft keine echte Meinungsbildung besitzen und lediglich vorhergesagte Muster replizieren. Dies kann zu Missverständnissen, inhaltlichen Ungenauigkeiten und fehl... | |
| 6 | 2025-03-21 13:34 | dieterdreist | (man muss dazusagen, dass es kurz und bündig sein soll) | |
| 131971116 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2023-02-01 17:04 | 1 | 2025-03-15 16:43 | Jrachi ♦769 | water=279 è sicuramente un errore.Ma cosa voleva significare? |
| 2 | 2025-03-15 21:26 | dieterdreist | deve essere `ascent`, mi dispiace che è sfuggito, ci potrebbe essere stato il focus della tastiera nel window dei tag, ho premuto w per cambiare modo di disegno ma ero nella finestra dei tag con il focus. accidenti… | |
| 9352953 by dieterdreist @ 2011-09-20 16:34 | 1 | 2025-03-14 08:10 | Jrachi ♦769 | Ciao.Ho pescato due vecchie relazioni dove hai inserito network= local.Controlla anche gli altri tag, è passato molto tempo!Ivo |
| 2 | 2025-03-14 09:09 | dieterdreist | sì, passato molto tempo. Ci sono stato altre volte di seguito, ma la situazione cambia (alle volta era chiusa una parte per frana, (ma i locali andavano comunque). Non saprei per gli altri tag, e non mi sembra nemmeno lineare, intanto quello che posso fare è correggere il tag lwn. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-14 09:28 | Jrachi ♦769 | Grazie! | |
| 136705577 by vlattanzi @ 2023-05-29 15:15 | 1 | 2025-03-13 14:53 | dieterdreist | Ciao, ho notato che hai inserito delle piccole linee di elettricità come power=cable e i supporti come power=tower. Guardando le foto aerei, mi sembrano power=pole i supporti e power=minor_line le linee. Non conosco la situazione nel luogo, per questo ti chiedo. Ad esempio qui: node 109371242... |
| 125164937 by cronoser @ 2022-08-20 22:55 | 1 | 2022-10-09 21:30 | dieterdreist | Hi, I have seen you added this drinking fountain, probably because you did not notice that it is already mapped, but as not working: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1645052573can you confirm it is working again?Martin |
| 2 | 2025-03-06 19:36 | cronoser ♦101 | Hello, sorry to answer now, I was there when I mapped with OsmAnd, you changed the tags one day before my edition :-) I suppose that you where at the STOM Firenze like me. I will delete my node. Thanks for the advise. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-07 20:27 | dieterdreist | Thank you for replying, yes I have been to SotM as well :) | |
| 104003201 by didapike @ 2021-05-02 16:27 | 1 | 2025-02-23 09:30 | dieterdreist | Hi, I just noticed you deleted the fountain of the amphores with all its detail and history here, without even mentioning it in the meaningless comment “fix streets” and then you redrew a circle and tagged it with natural=water which is not what this fountain looks like. This is not ho... |
| 157762349 by fb552 @ 2024-10-11 15:30 | 1 | 2025-02-02 15:45 | dieterdreist | The halt Acilia Sud ist not open yet, I will set it to construction now |
| 156044966 by AlCeRoma @ 2024-09-01 09:11 | 1 | 2025-01-27 09:26 | dieterdreist | Ciao AlCe, ho notato che hai modificato questo ufficio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1110502520/history ma mi sembra che non è più lì. |
| 2 | 2025-01-29 10:55 | AlCeRoma ♦9 | in effetti l'edificio è vuoto, ho eliminato i riferimenti a Telecom | |
| 3 | 2025-01-29 14:13 | dieterdreist | grazie :-) | |
| 156323808 by mau59 @ 2024-09-07 18:05 | 1 | 2025-01-27 09:28 | dieterdreist | Ciao mau59, mi sembra che hai rimosso la pista ciclabile lungo Grotta Perfetta, non esiste più? C'è anche una nota di 27 giorni fa che dice che manca la pista ciclabile in OSM.salutiMartin |
| 127766761 by hindukusc @ 2022-10-19 08:44 | 1 | 2025-01-21 09:45 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno hindukusc, ti volevo segnalare che i sentieri che possono essere utilizzati con veicoli a 4 ruote in OSM non sono "path" ma "track", un esempio è qui: way 1105158013SalutiMartin |
| 161573265 by iandees @ 2025-01-20 17:53 | 1 | 2025-01-20 17:55 | dieterdreist | well done, I was just 1 minute too late :)Thank you |
| 2 | 2025-01-20 18:06 | thefabi ♦17 | The OSM-Community Discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 | |
| 3 | 2025-01-20 19:48 | Glassman ♦5,240 | The alt_name should also be reverted. Happy to do so | |
| 4 | 2025-01-20 19:54 | iandees ♦724 | Done | |
| 5 | 2025-01-20 20:25 | dieterdreist | arguably the alt_name is valid as of now, it doesn’t have to be official | |
| 6 | 2025-01-20 20:34 | iandees ♦724 | Trump hasn't signed any executive orders yet, he's only announced them in a speech. Executive orders need to be signed and recorded in the Federal Register, where they'll appear here: https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders | |
| 7 | 2025-01-20 21:27 | dieterdreist | that’s for the official_name, it has nothing to do with alt_name | |
| 161425453 by riccardoascione @ 2025-01-16 16:32 | 1 | 2025-01-16 22:30 | AwFi ♦26 | Ciao!mi hanno fatto notare le tue modifiche alla mappa e vedo che sei nuovo su OSM. Intanto benvenuto!Vorrei inizialmente spiegarti che su OpenStreetMap si sta mappando il mondo reale, quindi tutto ciò che è veramente in progettazione/costruzione oltre a ciò che &egrav... |
| 2 | 2025-01-17 10:53 | dieterdreist | Aggiungendo all'ottimo commento di AwFi, ti segnalo "umap", che è un servizio basato su OSM (come sfondo), ma dove puoi inserire ciò che vuoi perché è una mappa tua personale.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UMapCi sono vari istanze pubbliche, ad ese... | |
| 161424132 by riccardoascione @ 2025-01-16 15:53 | 1 | 2025-01-17 10:01 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno, e benvenuto in OpenStreetMap. Ho notato per caso che hai introdotto delle stazioni ferroviarie che già esistono, ad esempio "Pigneto" (mappata come area) e "Cornelia" (non è di treni, è della metro). Quando hai dei dubbi su cose mancanti (come sta... |
| 2 | 2025-01-17 10:46 | dieterdreist | Ho adesso visto che Cornelia è una stazione proposta, in questo caso non si deve inserire come stazione attiva, ho cambiato il tagging.SalutiMartin | |
| 3 | 2025-01-17 10:48 | dieterdreist | Sistemato anche Don Minzoni | |
| 4 | 2025-03-17 22:36 | ALn_668 ♦11 | L'utente non risponde, sistemata situazione a stazione Pigneto | |
| 86762800 by Antanicus @ 2020-06-17 08:59 | 1 | 2025-01-15 09:07 | dieterdreist | Hi, I realize this is already some years ago, but just in case I wanted to tell you to be careful with pedestrian crossing tagging. If there are zebra markings and traffic signals, the "crossing" value should be "traffic_signals".Thank you,Dieterdreist |
| 2 | 2025-01-15 09:26 | Antanicus ♦8 | Thank you for the heads up, will do! | |
| 3 | 2025-01-15 11:36 | dieterdreist | great, thank you for replying so quickly... | |
| 159232870 by servilius_ahala @ 2024-11-17 08:31 | 1 | 2025-01-15 09:26 | dieterdreist | Hi, you added the name "Via Cassia at km 11.700" as a name. How can this be a name for an archaeological site? Have you been to the place, or what did you base your edits on? I noticed someone has now added a petrol station to the site, and on aerial imagery it looks as if there is buildin... |
| 2 | 2025-01-16 20:33 | servilius_ahala ♦2 | The service station is preexisting. The site and its recent opening to public visits has been well covered in the Italian press. | |
| 157301023 by Andrea de Natale Sifola Galiani @ 2024-09-30 14:37 | 1 | 2025-01-12 22:50 | dieterdreist | Ciao Andrea, ho capito che questo non è più una strada, ma sicuramente non è nemmeno da cancellare, deve diventare pedonale. Ho ripristinato la strada cancellata e messo come pedonale. È giusto? |
| 2 | 2025-01-13 06:38 | Andrea de Natale Sifola Galiani ♦1 | Buongiorno, sì perdonami, quel tratto è pedonale. Grazie della pazienza :) | |
| 3 | 2025-01-13 07:51 | dieterdreist | Grazie della risposta, quindi ora è giusto? Ti segnalo, quando qualcosa va storta, c’è ctrl+z per tornare indietro.Saluti Martin | |
| 157079763 by mau59 @ 2024-09-25 12:23 | 1 | 2025-01-12 23:03 | dieterdreist | Hi, it seems you have changed some zebra crossings to traffic signal crossings here, but they are actually zebra crossings, for example in Via del Foro Olitorio |
| 130875636 by ticki_52 @ 2023-01-04 17:14 | 1 | 2024-12-25 22:24 | Mammi71 ♦253 | Hallo ticki_52, hast Du die ganzen Furten, die Du in diesem CS zugefügt hast, auch gesehen? Oder nur Warnhinweise behoben? Einerseits erscheint es mir arg und ungewöhnlich viele Furten und andererseits an Stellen, die ich kenne, jedoch kann ich mich nicht an Furten erinnern. |
| 2 | 2024-12-26 20:07 | ticki_52 ♦113 | Hallo, ich habe die Warnhinweise behoben, weil sich niemand darum kümmert. Es werden halt sehr häufig (Rad-)Wege mit "ungefährem Verlauf" gemappt und man kümmert sich nicht um die Details dazu. Ich kann aber nicht an jeden Ort, wo Fehlerchen gemappt wurden (highway kreu... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-27 06:53 | Mammi71 ♦253 | Hallo ticki_52, ähm, das macht mich ein wenig sprachlos. Warnungen sind doch nur Warnungen. Du kannst doch nicht einfach irgendwas falsches mappen, nur weil es da eine Warnung gibt die Du weghaben willst. Du kannstdoch nicht einfach Details erfinden und in die Datenbank eingeben, von denen Du n... | |
| 4 | 2024-12-27 09:22 | ticki_52 ♦113 | Hallo Mammi71, nun schalte mal ein paar Gänge runter. Die Arbeit erschwere nicht ich, sondern die Mapper, die einfach Wege mappen, ohne sich um die notwendigen Zusatzinfornationen zu kümmern, um sauberes Mapping zu haben. Und wenn dann die Fehler monate- oder auch jahrelang nicht bearbeite... | |
| 5 | 2024-12-27 09:34 | dieterdreist | Um den Fehler zu beheben muss man aber wissen was falsch ist. Es könnte ja sein dass sich Wasserweg und Fahrradweg bzw. Feldweg gar nicht queren sondern die Lage ungenau war, oder dass der Wasserweg verrohrt ist an der Querung. Wenn man da überall Furten einzeichnet sind das überall d... | |
| 6 | 2024-12-27 09:50 | ticki_52 ♦113 | ... jetzt habe ich mein Konzept verschickt. Sorry. Also nochmalHallo Mammi71, nun schalte mal ein paar Gänge runter. Wende Dich doch bitte an den Mapper, der den Pfad unvollständig kartiert hat. Der hat doch den Weg gemappt, ohne sich um die notwendigen Zusatzinfornationen zu kümm... | |
| 7 | 2024-12-27 12:57 | dieterdreist | Die Warnungen sind mögliche Probleme, echte Probleme werden es erst wenn man potentiell falsche Daten ergänzt um die Warnungen loszuwerden. Der Sinn ist, dass man sie behebt wenn man die erforderlichen Informationen hat. Wenn da jahrelang kein Mapper vorbeikommt und sich die Stelle ansieht... | |
| 8 | 2024-12-27 14:07 | ticki_52 ♦113 | Akzeptiert..... es wäre wohl besser gewesen, die Hinweise auf die fehlenden Nodes zu ignorieren, woran ich mich nun halte. Jedoch kann ich mir nicht verkneifen als Einzelbeispiel eine Stilblüte für fantasievolles Mapping den CS150886124 zu nennen. Als Krönung bittet ein Streetco... | |
| 9 | 2024-12-27 23:34 | dieterdreist | wünsche Dir auch einen guten Rutsch, und freue mich dass Du Deine Meinung nochmal überdacht hast, und das auch öffentlich machst, die Größe haben nicht alle. | |
| 10 | 2024-12-29 19:19 | Mammi71 ♦253 | @ticki_52: dieterdreist hat eigentlich schon alles geschrieben, wie ich es besser auch nicht hätte schreiben können. Und ich schließe mich im an und sage danke, dass Du Deine Meinung noch einmal überdacht hast.Ein paar Ergänzungen meinerseits: alles vollständig und k... | |
| 11 | 2024-12-29 19:25 | Mammi71 ♦253 | Zu Deiner Stilblüte: nun, das ist SC. An derStelle etwas Quatsch, aber naja. Aber insgesamt sollte der Bereich auch noch einmal unter die Lupe genommen werden. einen highway=service mit surface=fine_gravel zu path mit dirt herunterzustufen (und dabei die Brücken zu "übersehen&quo... | |
| 12 | 2024-12-30 17:40 | ticki_52 ♦113 | Zitat: "...wirst Du viele water-/highway-Kreuzungen finden, die ich als Brücke, Durchlass und selten als Furt gemappt habe. Dass sie oft fehlen, ist mir auch ein Dorn im Auge.... => Genau das halte ich für problematisch. Für Brücken und Durchlässe sind bauliche Ma&sz... | |
| 13 | 2024-12-30 23:06 | Mammi71 ♦253 | Zitat: "Genau das halte ich für problematisch. Für Brücken und Durchlässe sind bauliche Maßnahmen erforderlich, die aber u.U. gar nicht vorhanden sind."Da hast Du was falsch verstanden. Ich mappe das nur, wenn ich mir das zuvor angesehen habe. Im Zweifel auch se... | |
| 160538030 by mau59 @ 2024-12-23 13:23 | 1 | 2024-12-26 00:13 | dieterdreist | Hi, I think this drinking fountain was moved in error, can you confirm?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10436409967 |
| 134297949 by Michele Aquilani @ 2023-03-30 10:24 | 1 | 2024-12-20 22:55 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele, ho notato che stavi cambiando crossing=zebra in crossing=uncontrolled. Io credo è meglio "zebra", perché le strisce non sono "uncontrolled" (anche se questo valore è documentato da più tempo, non è molto chiaro). Invece crossing=ze... |
| 2 | 2024-12-21 17:18 | Michele Aquilani ♦7 | Ciao, io facevo esattamente cosí fino a qualche mese fa. Poi ho visto che l'editor suggerisce "Attraversamento pedonale segnalato" (etichettato con uncontrolled) e come tipo fa scegliere le strisce pedonali (crossing:markings=zebra). Ho immaginato che fosse il modo in cui pre... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-23 10:20 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele,la questione del tag "crossing" è lunga e contesa. Il tag "crossing" viene abbinato a "highway=crossing" e descrive il tipo di attraversamento. Storicamente si usava "crossing=uncontrolled" per le strisce (quando non ci sono semafori) e c... | |
| 4176281 by dieterdreist @ 2010-03-20 03:32 | 1 | 2024-02-05 17:40 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,666 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/670128597/history has access:vehicle that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)Would using vehicle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:vehicle ) be fitting at least equally well? |
| 2 | 2024-02-05 19:07 | dieterdreist | who knows Mateusz, I have been there 14 years ago... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-21 23:52 | dieterdreist | I fixed it. Thank you. | |
| 45815620 by Karthoo @ 2017-02-04 21:22 | 1 | 2024-12-20 22:37 | dieterdreist | Hi, I noticed that you added a pharmacy here: node 4664316302It doesn't seem to be a pharmacy actually, because it is called "Parafarmacia" which means something like "Rollstühle, Nahrungsergänzungsmittel, Blutdruckmessgeräte und Thrombosenstrümpfe etc."... |
| 2 | 2024-12-21 08:06 | Karthoo ♦214 | Hey, you are right, that probably was the wrong tag as I wasn't aware of that difference. But unfortunately I also can't find the mapillary imagery anymore to confirm the name and it's been a while since I was there last time. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-21 09:03 | dieterdreist | Hi, thank you for replying, the name is ok I think because it was better specified in 2023 by another mapper, I’ll fix the place.Frohes Fest,Martin | |
| 116878225 by random_citizen @ 2022-02-01 17:33 | 1 | 2024-12-20 22:29 | dieterdreist | Hi, I noticed that you added healthcare=pharmacy here: node 4664316302 When do you check this? I don't have the impression there was ever a pharmacy there. |
| 160248790 by Adrian Kilroy @ 2024-12-13 14:37 | 1 | 2024-12-18 12:29 | dieterdreist | Hello Adrian, thank you for contributing to the map and adding the Roma Tiburtina Railway Station. You may have overlooked it, but the station was already mapped also here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1313285471 (and since 2011 at least, please consider this is a major railway station, how li... |
| 2 | 2024-12-18 12:36 | dieterdreist | I transferred the IATA code IRT you had added to the station node, but frankly I didn't find any reference to this code, rather I did explicitly not find it either in the iata lookup https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/ nor in the wikipedia list of IATA codes. Where did... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-18 12:51 | Adrian Kilroy ♦1 | Hi Martin,Thank you for transferring the IATA code.The source linking the IRT iata code to Rome Tiburtina Railway Station:https://www.wego.com/airports/rom/airports-in-rome/roma-tiburtina-railway-station-irtThe iata lookup link you provided only searches for airlines and airports.B... | |
| 4 | 2024-12-18 23:12 | dieterdreist | I think this is not a real IATA number, it might be from an unofficial or specific internal use for a particular service provider, but it is not a standard IATA designation and does not seem to be used by others. | |
| 5 | 2024-12-19 08:20 | Adrian Kilroy ♦1 | Hi Martin,Rail IATA codes, while not officially maintained by IATA, are widely recognized and utilized across the global travel industry. Their primary purpose is to facilitate seamless integration for intermodal travel within booking systems such as Sabre and Amadeus, which power most online tr... | |
| 6 | 2024-12-20 11:02 | dieterdreist | Can you explain who assigns and maintains these additional "IATA"-numbers if it isn't IATA? How can do they ensure no code is assigned more than once? | |
| 7 | 2024-12-20 11:51 | Adrian Kilroy ♦1 | Hi Martin,These pseudo-IATA codes are maintained by multiple stakeholders. Global Distribution Systems, like Sabre and Amadeus, coordinate with IATA to avoid overlaps. | |
| 148719202 by gigi2037 @ 2024-03-16 07:21 | 1 | 2024-12-12 12:15 | dieterdreist | ti posso chiedere di mettere commenti più sensati, non si capisce perché hai fatto questi edit e cosa hai fatto. Sto correggendo stazioni doppie, e trovo delle cose, anche di te, che mi sembrano troppo approssimative. Il nodo 11736267576, creato qui, collega un tunnel footway sotto i b... |
| 118290487 by VLD181 @ 2022-03-09 18:43 | 1 | 2024-12-12 10:49 | dieterdreist | Hello VLD181, I do not understand your comment, but I saw that you deleted the name from the subway station. I now added it back again, please be more careful, thank you. |
| 154072414 by gigi2037 @ 2024-07-17 19:20 | 1 | 2024-12-12 10:21 | dieterdreist | Ciao Gigi, ti segnalo che ho cancellato alcuni tag da https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12059951275 perché ha creato un doppione della stazione (se si tratta di una "platform" non deve avere tag come railway=station, e in questo caso c'era già un altro oggetto con "... |
| 2 | 2024-12-12 10:42 | dieterdreist | Ci sono altri doppioni su altre stazioni, generalmente ci possono essere più railway=platform o public_transport=platform, ma sono delle way. Tu hai inserito un railway=platform al centro di due binari dove non si trova una banchina e dove già c'erano delle railway=platform dove d... | |
| 159414897 by EttoreV_littoria @ 2024-11-21 15:29 Active block | 1 | 2024-12-02 20:42 | dieterdreist | Ciao, benvenuto in OpenStreetMap. Ho notato che hai aggiunto il tag railway=subway al tratto della Metro C in progetto, ma così lo segni come Metro attiva. L'ho ripristinato, ma ti volevo farlo sapere.Saluti,Martin |
| 123141109 by AlCeRoma @ 2022-07-03 07:24 | 1 | 2024-11-20 15:14 | dieterdreist | Ciao, ho notato che hai cambiato la fermata Stella Polare da railway=halt in railway=station, mi sembra che era giusto prima. Ciao,Martin |
| 2 | 2024-11-21 15:31 | AlCeRoma ♦9 | Il valore "halt" si usa per fermate ferroviarie molto piccole in cui i treni si fermano su richiesta, non mi sembra proprio il caso di Stella Polare... | |
| 3 | 2024-11-22 10:24 | dieterdreist | no, la questione non è se si ferma su richiesta, ma se ci sono deviatori. Se ci passano solo binari senza che i treni possono cambiare binario è un "halt" e non una "station", in Italia i nomi sono "fermata" e "stazione". | |
| 4 | 2024-11-22 15:37 | AlCeRoma ♦9 | bene, in effetti sulla wiki inglese è stato inserito un grafico che permette di distinguere i due valori. Ho modificato così alcune stazioni della Roma-Lido perché avevo notato che erano improvvisamente sparite dalla mappa. | |
| 5 | 2024-11-28 12:19 | dieterdreist | grazie per la spiegazione ma la fermata è ancora mappata come "station": https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248413804 | |
| 123198659 by AlCeRoma @ 2022-07-04 15:57 | 1 | 2024-11-22 10:30 | dieterdreist | Ciao Alce, anche qui è stato cambiato railway=halt in railway=stop e poi (qui) in railway=station. Mi sembra era giusto railway=halt. |
| 135275207 by Matteo Fid @ 2023-04-23 19:39 | 1 | 2024-11-22 10:28 | dieterdreist | Ciao Matteo, tra le "modifiche" varie hai anche cambiato ad esempio la fermata di Castel Fusano da "railway=halt" in "railway=station", perché? Mi sembra chiaramente errato. |
| 121502877 by Michele Aquilani @ 2022-05-26 06:00 | 1 | 2024-11-21 21:47 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele, ho notato che hai cambiato railway=stop in railway=stop;station qui https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/24969004Si dovrebbe avere al meno 2 elementi distinti per questo, uno per la station e uno per ogni direzione la posizione dove ferma (stop) |
| 2 | 2024-11-23 11:45 | Michele Aquilani ♦7 | Uh, è successo tanto tempo fa. Probabilmente un refuso, spero non ce ne siano altri. | |
| 53561593 by keimo @ 2017-11-06 18:07 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:21 | dieterdreist | please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things |
| 2 | 2024-11-08 10:23 | dremdau ♦14 | I disagree, the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:staircase) says that addr:unit is usually used instead. Also, why are you commenting on a 7 year old changeset? | |
| 3 | 2024-11-08 12:10 | dieterdreist | I don't think we should continue to pretend it is ok to use addr:unit for staircases, because these are quite different things, an addr:unit is typically referring to an individual address, while addr:staircase is usually referring to many addresses (everybody who has access through this stairc... | |
| 4 | 2024-11-20 10:21 | dieterdreist | keimo, are you going to revert your undiscussed mass edit? | |
| 5 | 2024-11-20 14:37 | keimo ♦17 | No, and I don't think fixing non-standard tags requires discussion.Reverting this (and other similar tags in Finland) would also break public transport routing to the entrances in question.Isn't there another tag you could use to indicate that the address is to a staircase, if that... | |
| 6 | 2024-11-21 08:29 | dieterdreist | I don't know about Finland, and whether it has been discussed there, but the edit was not limited to Finland. Generally, all mass edits require public discussion and approval. I question that you "fixed" the tags, because "addr:unit" is not the same as "addr:staircase&q... | |
| 112981744 by timlamec @ 2021-10-26 08:26 | 1 | 2022-02-20 07:38 | user_5359 ♦19,415 | Hello! What is your interpretation of the key altitude? Did you mean the key ele (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele)?Bonjour ! Quelle est la signification du key altitude ? Voulez-vous dire la clé ele (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RFR:Key:ele) ? |
| 2 | 2024-11-20 09:04 | dieterdreist | Hi, I also noticed the altitude tags. What is the unit, is it meters? Are these things levitating above the ground or did you intend to map the elevation of the ground where they stand on? If these are thought to be meters, e.g. 818.9404396, the indicated precision is between micrometers and nanom... | |
| 31899393 by dieterdreist @ 2015-06-11 15:09 | 1 | 2024-11-15 10:12 | opendcc ♦1,535 | Hallo, was meintest Du hier mit entrance=disabled? gesperrt oder für disabled people? |
| 2 | 2024-11-15 10:26 | dieterdreist | gute Frage nach 9 Jahren, könntest Du evtl. einen Link auf das Objekt posten bzw. sagen, wo genau, dann muss ich es nicht raussuchen? | |
| 3 | 2024-11-15 10:28 | dieterdreist | Habe es doch gefunden, war gar nicht so schwer ;-)https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3588048319damit ist wheelchair=yes gemeint, bzw. dürfen da glaube ich nur Menschen mit Gehbehinderung den Aufzug benutzen, war da aber schon Jahre nicht mehr und kann es nicht genau sagen ob das noch aktuel... | |
| 4 | 2024-11-15 10:29 | dieterdreist | jedenfalls war es damals ein Eingang für Behinderte und nicht ein ungenutzter Eingang | |
| 5 | 2024-11-15 23:08 | opendcc ♦1,535 | Danke. | |
| 158241004 by fb552 @ 2024-10-23 08:00 | 1 | 2024-11-13 12:55 | dieterdreist | Ciao fb552, ho notato che hai creato una serie di doppioni delle stazioni, perché hai aggiunto all'edificio della stazione il tag per la stazione ferroviaria (railway=station), ma questo già era presente sulla stazione (tutto il perimetro dove si trova la stazione, la banchina, i ... |
| 2 | 2024-11-13 13:33 | fb552 ♦17 | Ciao Martin,intendi che l'edificio con il tag railway=station è un duplicato rispetto ai nodi con lo stesso tag? Perché il perimetro della stazione non è presente ovunque e dove lo è è segnato come landuse=railway.Per il tag railway=station dove è m... | |
| 3 | 2024-11-14 12:31 | dieterdreist | Ciao fb552,sì, per ogni stazione ci dovrebbe essere solo un railway=station (o nel caso della fermata railway=halt), e questo può essere un area oppure un nodo (l'area è meglio secondome). Invece per l'edificio della stazione è sufficiente essere incluso nell&... | |
| 53676260 by keimo @ 2017-11-10 19:54 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:20 | dieterdreist | please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things |
| 53562477 by keimo @ 2017-11-06 18:38 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:20 | dieterdreist | please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things |
| 53564346 by keimo @ 2017-11-06 19:29 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:19 | dieterdreist | please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things |
| 53501787 by keimo @ 2017-11-04 11:35 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:19 | dieterdreist | please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things |
| 53501842 by keimo @ 2017-11-04 11:37 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:19 | dieterdreist | please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things |
| 53677842 by keimo @ 2017-11-10 20:59 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:18 | dieterdreist | please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things |
| 53918699 by keimo @ 2017-11-19 09:35 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:18 | dieterdreist | please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things |
| 53677012 by keimo @ 2017-11-10 20:26 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:18 | dieterdreist | please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things |
| 53900749 by keimo @ 2017-11-18 13:11 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:17 | dieterdreist | please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things |
| 53844929 by keimo @ 2017-11-16 15:33 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:17 | dieterdreist | please revert the (undiscussed, global) retagging of addr:staircase to addr:unit, they are different things |
| 53934019 by keimo @ 2017-11-19 21:38 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:11 | dieterdreist | This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself. |
| 53562114 by keimo @ 2017-11-06 18:27 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:10 | dieterdreist | This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself. |
| 53561684 by keimo @ 2017-11-06 18:10 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:09 | dieterdreist | This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself. |
| 53975037 by keimo @ 2017-11-21 12:48 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:09 | dieterdreist | This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself. |
| 53566910 by keimo @ 2017-11-06 21:38 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:08 | dieterdreist | This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself. |
| 53565405 by keimo @ 2017-11-06 20:22 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:07 | dieterdreist | This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself. |
| 53566424 by keimo @ 2017-11-06 21:12 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:07 | dieterdreist | This is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit that removed addr:staircase (a tag for a flight of stairs as address component) and replaced it with addr:unit (an individual building unit as address component). Please revert it yourself. |
| 53566053 by keimo @ 2017-11-06 20:54 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:04 | dieterdreist | this is also part of the undiscussed mechanical edit it seems. |
| 53564779 by keimo @ 2017-11-06 19:52 | 1 | 2024-11-08 09:02 | dieterdreist | Hi keimo, is this possibly an undiscussed automated or mechanical edit? It seems you replaced addr:staircase with addr:unit, but these are likely describing different situations, and I believe here (5 building levels) it is much more likely that addr:staircase applies rather than addr:unit. |
| 113197856 by AlCeRoma @ 2021-10-31 15:24 | 1 | 2024-10-27 00:32 | dieterdreist | Ciao AlCe, ho notato che hai cambiato il tag dell'edificio centro convegni da building=convention in building=service, non mi sembra un miglioramento. building=service viene utilizzato per edifici poco significativi, solitamente piccoli. Sono ritornato con la classificazione,https://wiki.op... |
| 38539175 by Geogast @ 2016-04-13 21:20 | 1 | 2024-10-22 22:11 | dieterdreist | danke fürs taggen des loc_name! Ich habe gerade zufällig den Bahnhof angesehen. Was hieltest du von loc_name=Zoo und short_name=Bahnhof Zoo? Das eröffnete natürlich Verwechslungspotenzial mit dem Zoo-Zoo, aber im Alltagsgebrauch ist das ja auch so. |
| 154819874 by dieterdreist @ 2024-08-04 16:18 | 1 | 2024-10-22 14:31 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,666 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12092083518/history has shop = pet_supplies that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)shop=pet_supplies ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=pet ? If yes, wha... |
| 2 | 2024-10-22 19:28 | dieterdreist | I am not sure we should. I have not been inside, just seen the outside, it seemed to have just pet food and other articles, but no pets (like fish or birds, or mice, or similar animals). I did not check the wiki and this is not something I am mapping very often. Feel free to retag. | |
| 156111763 by busnotturno95 @ 2024-09-02 18:22 | 1 | 2024-10-18 12:00 | dieterdreist | Salve, ho notato che hai migliorato la precisione di questa rotonda: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408549194/history da 24 nodi a 511 nodi. È stato un’azione volontaria o forse una svista oppure un problema di software? |
| 140797775 by elb000 @ 2023-09-04 10:33 | 1 | 2024-10-15 22:56 | dieterdreist | Ciao, ho notato che hai inserito dei cavi 150kV, sotto terra, penso il tag dovrebbe essere power=cable, e non power=line, perchè si tratta di cavi isolati:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Apower%3DcableCiao,dieterdreist |
| 2 | 2024-10-15 23:03 | dieterdreist | Il commento era in riferimento a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1204857010/ (l'ho adesso sistemato e gli altri in questo changeset erano già stati corretti da altri, come ho visto ora) | |
| 56504559 by iLaw @ 2018-02-19 21:51 | 1 | 2024-09-15 19:49 | dieterdreist | Ciao, ho notato che hai inserito questo service, ma mi sembra strano. Forse è privato e c’è un cancello?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562591941Saluti |
| 155240922 by donovaly @ 2024-08-14 13:21 | 1 | 2024-09-04 09:31 | skyper ♦871 | Hi donovaly,bei `motorroad=yes` braucht es doch nicht `foot=no`, `bicycle=no` und `horse=no`.Grüße skyper |
| 2 | 2024-09-04 12:43 | donovaly ♦37 | > bei `motorroad=yes` braucht es doch nicht `foot=no`, `bicycle=no` und `horse=no`. Wo steht das?Und außerdem, wieso sollte man auf einer motorroad nicht auch mit dem Fahrrad fahren dürfen? In Belgrad und Kiev darf man das z.B.Horse habe ich einfach mit angeklickt, weil es nicht ... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-04 13:25 | skyper ♦871 | Bitte lese doch einfach das Wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorroadhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorroad#Germany,_Croatiaoder noch deutlicher:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:motorroad | |
| 4 | 2024-09-04 13:36 | donovaly ♦37 | > Bitte lese doch einfach das Wiki: Und eine Wiki Eintrag, hat Rechtskraft oder was?Diese typisch deutsche Überheblichkeit. Hier in Tirana MUSST du sogar auf der als Kraftfahrtstraße laufen, um zu deinem Uni-Gebäude zu kommen. Und natürlich nehmen die Leute auch Fahrr&aum... | |
| 5 | 2024-09-04 14:04 | skyper ♦871 | Ich weiß jetzt nicht, warum Du Dich angegriffen fühlst, aber Dein Kommunikationsstil ist nicht gerade förderlich. Ich wollte Dir nur einen Tipp geben und verhindern, dass Du unnötig Zeit und Ressourcen verschwendest.Nein, das Wiki ist genauso eine Baustelle wie die auch die ... | |
| 6 | 2024-09-04 16:22 | dieterdreist | ich denke ebenfalls, dass der Sinn von motorroad=yes genau der ist, foot=no bicycle=no horse=no und moped=no (etc) zu implizieren, ansonsten ist es einfach highway=trunk ohne motorrad und man setzt ggf. den access für die diversen Bewegungsarten einzeln | |
| 50238848 by WayneSchlegel @ 2017-07-12 19:22 | 1 | 2024-09-02 14:47 | dieterdreist | Hi, irgendwie sind hier bei Hornbach eine Menge Informationen verloren gegangen, z.B. Filialnummer, Telefonnummer, Steuernummer etc.Vielleicht auf ein größeres Polygon migriert vom Gebäude? Das kann ich gerade nicht prüfen, in der aktuellen Version waren ein paar tags wieder d... |
| 155772381 by aktivnutzer @ 2024-08-26 09:39 | 1 | 2024-08-27 10:48 | dieterdreist | es gibt “den Nutzer” nicht, es gibt viele Nutzer. Das Kriterium fürs Mappen ist: gibt es oder nicht, also sollte das revertiert werden |
| 2 | 2024-08-27 12:05 | scai ♦267 | Bitte nicht aus fadenscheinigen Gründen real existierende Daten löschen. Es mag nicht unglaublich sinnvoll sein, diese Bäume einzeln einzutragen, aber falsch ist es ganz sicher nicht. | |
| 3 | 2024-08-27 12:53 | OSM_RogerWilco ♦724 | Ich schließe mich dem an. Das Löschen von Objekten ist hier nicht in Ordnung. Einzelbäume zu Erfassen ist nichts ungewöhnliches und vollkommen in Ordnung. | |
| 4 | 2024-08-27 14:31 | aktivnutzer ♦1 | Hallo zusammen, war sicherlich der falsche Weg von mir. Ich hätte im Vorfeld eine Diskussion über das Thema starten sollen. Sorry, wollte niemandem zu nahe treten.@dieterdreist: ja stimmt, es gibt nicht 'den Nutzer' und in sofern auch nicht 'den sinnvollen Weg'.@sca... | |
| 5 | 2024-08-27 18:33 | dieterdreist | Klar, jeder kann nur das eintragen was er will, aber natürlich nicht löschen was er will. OpenStreetMap ist ja kein Kartenprogramm sondern eine Datenbank, je mehr die wächst um so weniger wird man beim Benutzen alles haben wollen, sondern eben einen Extrakt der Dinge die einem wichtig... | |
| 6 | 2024-08-27 18:34 | dieterdreist | dir auch Danke für die Diskussion | |
| 155295147 by Xyshnyk1990 @ 2024-08-15 17:53 Active block | 1 | 2024-08-24 18:59 | dieterdreist | not a castle |
| 155384056 by Xyshnyk1990 @ 2024-08-17 18:12 Active block | 1 | 2024-08-24 18:50 | dieterdreist | not a castle |
| 155418827 by Xyshnyk1990 @ 2024-08-18 14:43 Active block | 1 | 2024-08-24 18:48 | dieterdreist | non è un castello |
| 154850507 by Xyshnyk1990 @ 2024-08-05 13:13 Active block | 1 | 2024-08-24 18:45 | dieterdreist | Ti chiedo di non inserire civici con tag come historic=castle e name. Il tag è addr:housenumber.Grazie |
| 155672902 by Xyshnyk1990 @ 2024-08-23 21:18 Active block | 1 | 2024-08-24 15:36 | dieterdreist | Hi, there is no castle here. |
| 2 | 2024-08-24 19:34 | ivanbranco ♦2,701 | Questo utente é giá stato bloccato una volta (3 mesi fa) per lo stesso motivo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7112 | |
| 1899638 by Eric S @ 2009-07-21 22:14 | 1 | 2024-08-15 16:22 | dieterdreist | Hi, I know this is a long time ago, just noticed visiting Fabriano that there are no signs at the vicoli like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37918958 so I don’t think they can be considered pedestrian, do you remember or know the area? |
| 2 | 2024-08-17 15:54 | Eric S ♦31 | Hi, I made de round trip in the city while waiting for train connexion. Mainly, I would suggest you to get in touch with local community for street classification. Although not strictly pedestrian (no traffic sign at entrance), some of them are not likely to be use by car. For such historical narrow... | |
| 3 | 2024-08-17 16:26 | dieterdreist | Hi Eric,thank you for your reply, and sorry for bothering you with stuff from 2009 (I also have been around by that time and am aware how few we had settled and defined compared to now). Yes, we are currently discussing about alleys, because there is no ideal tagging (the combination with servic... | |
| 4 | 2024-08-19 08:32 | Eric S ♦31 | In historical parts of cities, similar to Fabriano, such areas tend to be officially pedestrian.In rural areas, there may not be a clear distinction between streets and tracks. For instance:https://osm.org/go/0CArhUgbc--Also, snow may change the status:https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pK... | |
| 5 | 2024-08-21 14:40 | dieterdreist | > In historical parts of cities, similar to Fabriano, such areas tend to be officially pedestrian.I somehow agree that it many European countries this is the case, but the Fabriano example as well as many other towns in central Italy demonstrate, it does not have to be like this. If there isn... | |
| 6 | 2024-08-21 14:41 | dieterdreist | In Germany the usual situation is clear signage. Also there is much less two-wheeled non-bicycle traffic (very narrow streets in Germany would also usually forbid bicycles) | |
| 155057330 by Stn200220022002 @ 2024-08-10 11:09 | 1 | 2024-08-10 12:41 | dieterdreist | Benvenuto in OpenStreetMap, ti vorrei segnalare che non è logico il tuo commento, perché se è tombinato sotto terra significa che esiste. Dovresti ripristinare il tutto con un revert (per non perdere lo storico). |
| 154858896 by Struppi_ @ 2024-08-05 16:28 | 1 | 2024-08-05 21:30 | dieterdreist | solche detaillierten Informationen zu löschen mit dem Kommentar weniger detailliert ist ausreichend, das ist nicht ok. Jeder kann selbst entscheiden wie detailliert er Dinge einträgt, aber die Details der anderen zu löschen weil man sie für unnötig erachtet geht nicht. |
| 153947470 by Mouette85 @ 2024-07-14 21:16 | 1 | 2024-08-01 16:57 | dieterdreist | Hi, I noticed you have added amenity=marketplace to the christmas market POI on Piazza Navona. I have removed it because it is not a market usually and was quite misleading.Cheers dieterdreist |
| 75430523 by TWHB @ 2019-10-08 20:45 | 1 | 2019-11-20 12:34 | dieterdreist | Thank you for starting this! It was on my todo list for quite some time, but I haven't yet found the time to do it (refering to the city walls as building). |
| 2 | 2019-11-20 12:37 | dieterdreist | by the way, no need to unify the citywall parts, it is more sustainable to have parts that are smaller (easier to modify, and less damage if someone breaks them and easier to fix if this happens, also less editing conflicts). On the long run we may also add more detail to these parts anyway, e.g. wh... | |
| 3 | 2024-08-01 10:57 | dieterdreist | just saw you changed barrier=entrance to barrier=sally_port for porta Metronia, this is just plain wrong, there is no barrier whatsoever at Porta Metronia | |
| 154036415 by servilius_ahala @ 2024-07-17 00:40 | 1 | 2024-07-26 14:31 | dieterdreist | Ciao, ho visto che hai inserito questo deposito, ammetto che non ne ero a conoscenza, interessante. Credo che possiamo migliorare il tagging però, il "nome" mi sembra una descrizione, e forse "locality" non è il tag migliore? Di tratta di un deposito strutturato (... |
| 153906129 by mau59 @ 2024-07-13 18:56 | 1 | 2024-07-22 22:45 | dieterdreist | Ciao mau59, questo percorso way 124643469 non esiste proprio più, è stato cambiata la disposizione delle strade.SalutiMartin |
| 2 | 2024-07-23 08:26 | mau59 ♦16 | Ciao di nuovo Martin e grazie per la correzione. Ho una conoscenza diretta solo di una piccolissima percentuale dei luoghi che mappo, per cui mi affido quasi esclusivamente a Bing Maps, che chiaramente può non essere aggiornata e comunque non mostra sempre tutti i particolari necessari (risol... | |
| 3 | 2024-07-23 11:23 | dieterdreist | Ciao Maurizio, grazie della risposta, lo so che alle volte non è possibile capire la situazione da remoto, ti avevo scritto per darti un feedback dove ho notato problemi, ma ti vorrei anche ringraziare per tutti i contributi che dai!SalutiMartin | |
| 153751137 by mau59 @ 2024-07-09 16:12 | 1 | 2024-07-22 23:03 | dieterdreist | Ciao Mau, ti volevo segnalare che crossing=zebra si usa solo quando non esiste un semaforo per pedoni, altrimenti il tag è crossing=traffic_signals.SalutiMartin |
| 2 | 2024-07-23 08:14 | mau59 ♦16 | Ciao Martin, grazie per la segnalazione. In genere quando c'è un semaforo non uso mai il tag delle strisce pedonali: deve essermi sfuggito. Comunque mi sono sempre chiesto: in presenza di un semaforo le strisce ci sono sempre, ma possono essere di tipo diverso (zebra classica, doppia st... | |
| 3 | 2024-07-23 12:41 | ivanbranco ♦2,701 | Il tipo di strisce si può mappare con https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:markings | |
| 4 | 2024-07-23 18:08 | mau59 ♦16 | Ti ringrazio. Confesso che non mi è mai stato chiarissimo come taggare gli attraversamenti: ad esempio su JOSM le zebre si possono taggare come crossing:zebra, crossing_ref:zebra, crossingmarkings:zebra... In genere uso la tendina nella sezione Campi più che la sezione Etichette, anche... | |
| 154118479 by Naundorfer @ 2024-07-18 20:45 | 1 | 2024-07-19 04:17 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,402 | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/154119832 |
| 2 | 2024-07-19 10:40 | dieterdreist | welcher der angegebenen Gründe? Forstwirtschaftliche Anlagen werden nicht gelöscht sofern es sie gibt, bei den anderen ist nicht grundsätzlich von einem Betretungsverbot auszugehen und wenn es ein solches gibt ist “access” der richtige Weg. | |
| 154118594 by Naundorfer @ 2024-07-18 20:50 | 1 | 2024-07-19 04:17 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,402 | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/154119832 |
| 2 | 2024-07-19 10:37 | dieterdreist | Gibt es eine Quelle dafür dass dort das Betreten verboten ist? Nach meiner Recherche bedeutet es dass dort keine forstwirtschaftliche Nutzung möglich ist, aber zum Betreten habe ich nichts gefunden: par.29) https://www.revosax.sachsen.de/vorschrift/5405-SaechsWaldG#x34 | |
| 154118710 by Naundorfer @ 2024-07-18 20:56 | 1 | 2024-07-19 04:17 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,402 | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/154119832 |
| 2 | 2024-07-19 10:32 | dieterdreist | Laut sächsischer Landesregierung können Prozessschutzflächen weiterhin betreten werden: https://www.wald.sachsen.de/prozessschutz-im-wald-9436.html?_cp=%7B%22accordion-content-9441%22%3A%7B%2214%22%3Atrue%2C%2217%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22previousOpen%22%3A%7B%22group%22%3A%22accordion-conte... | |
| 154118732 by Naundorfer @ 2024-07-18 20:56 | 1 | 2024-07-19 04:17 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,402 | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/154119832 |
| 2 | 2024-07-19 10:31 | dieterdreist | Laut sächsischer Landesregierung können Prozessschutzflächen weiterhin betreten werden: https://www.wald.sachsen.de/prozessschutz-im-wald-9436.html?_cp=%7B%22accordion-content-9441%22%3A%7B%2214%22%3Atrue%2C%2217%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22previousOpen%22%3A%7B%22group%22%3A%22accordion-conte... | |
| 154118750 by Naundorfer @ 2024-07-18 20:57 | 1 | 2024-07-19 04:16 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,402 | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/154119832 |
| 2 | 2024-07-19 10:30 | dieterdreist | Laut sächsischer Landesregierung können Prozessschutzflächen weiterhin betreten werden: https://www.wald.sachsen.de/prozessschutz-im-wald-9436.html?_cp=%7B%22accordion-content-9441%22%3A%7B%2214%22%3Atrue%2C%2217%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22previousOpen%22%3A%7B%22group%22%3A%22accordion-conte... | |
| 154118036 by Naundorfer @ 2024-07-18 20:30 | 1 | 2024-07-19 04:18 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,402 | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/154119832 |
| 2 | 2024-07-19 10:22 | dieterdreist | Das wäre ähnlich wie zu behaupten die Darstellung von Banken und Polizeistationen sei hilfreich bei der Planung von Banküberfällen. Es stimmt zwar vielleicht, ist aber kein Kriterium für das Löschen, Betretungsverbote können mit access-tags abgebildet werden | |
| 153947826 by Spaghetti Monster🍝 @ 2024-07-14 21:30 | 1 | 2024-07-15 09:18 | dieterdreist | Hi, I noticed you changed the situation around via Marmorata / Porta San Paolo. Can you explain your sources? I believe this is still wrong now, e.g. in OpenStreetMap one cannot go from the tram station (busses go there as well) in direction of the Tiber river, but it is possible. Also you kept 2 ca... |
| 2 | 2024-07-15 11:00 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,069 | I was only trying to resolve dead-end oneway and other errors. I have no local knowledge of the area. I apologize if I inhibited any cleanup efforts | |
| 3 | 2024-07-15 11:28 | dieterdreist | Thank you for replying, IMHO you should not perform this kind of "fix", because it only hides the real problems. I have now tried to fix most of the problems in the area (as in differences to reality and possible turns and driving directions for psv), but there is still an open case with V... | |
| 129098034 by Chris Clemson @ 2022-11-18 18:53 | 1 | 2024-07-11 16:24 | dieterdreist | Hi Chris Clemson, I have just noticed that you added the Turkish Embassy (or what looks like it could be) here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10200225246with tags declaring it as a tourist information. Can you confirm if they operate a generic tourist information or specific information relat... |
| 61224583 by Hoschmi72 @ 2018-07-31 10:46 | 1 | 2024-06-26 15:43 | dieterdreist | beim Freibad sollten die Becken enthalten sein, und nicht ausgenommen wie es hier der Fall ist |
| 2 | 2024-06-28 06:22 | Hoschmi72 ♦18 | Hallo Dieter,hab leider gerade wenig bis keine Zeit für OSM. Wäre nett, wenn du das korrigieren könntest. Danke und GrüßeHolger | |
| 3 | 2024-06-28 06:44 | dieterdreist | danke für die Rückmeldung, ich fixe das in ein paar Tagen wenn ich wieder einen PC statt eines Smartphones nutzen kann. | |
| 4 | 2024-06-28 06:49 | Hoschmi72 ♦18 | Super, Danke | |
| 5 | 2024-07-05 11:15 | dieterdreist | Hallo Holger,habe es jetzt gefixt, habe das Gras vom Freibad getrennt (2 Objekte) und auch den Umriss etwas verbessert (je nachdem ob Gras oder Freibad). Die Teile außerhalb der Perimetereinfassung (Zaun) habe ich aus dem Freibad rausgenommen, da sind zwar ggf. Mitarbeiterparkplätze und... | |
| 6 | 2024-07-08 12:28 | Hoschmi72 ♦18 | Hallo Dieter, sieht sehr gut aus. War vermutlich eine Mordsarbeit. Danke nochmals. | |
| 7 | 2024-07-08 14:03 | dieterdreist | danke dir. Es ging mit der Arbeit, der Großteil war ja schon da, habe nur den landuse gras from Freibad getrennt und hier und da ein paar Details ergänzt. | |
| 153068295 by Mouette85 @ 2024-06-23 13:34 | 1 | 2024-07-08 12:50 | dieterdreist | Hi, I noticed that you changed the wikipedia tag here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1737642/historycan you explain what you wanted to achieve? The link to wikipedia was broken and I fixed it, but I suspect it could have been caused by some broken software. |
| 152592207 by Xyshnyk1990 @ 2024-06-12 15:13 Active block | 1 | 2024-06-23 00:31 | dieterdreist | "85 pal.3" doesn't seem to be an addr:housenumber. |
| 81193361 by Lucas Filippi @ 2020-02-19 01:01 | 1 | 2024-06-19 14:04 | dieterdreist | Ciao Lucas, there is no restaurant here, I delete it now.Best,dieterdreist |
| 136549637 by Matteo Fid @ 2023-05-25 15:43 | 1 | 2024-06-19 13:35 | dieterdreist | Ciao Matteo, ho notato che hai aggiunto foot=no a Via dei Cerchi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128648701 ma questo dovrebbe essere yes (quindi omesso, perché default/normale)saluti Martin |
| 98078381 by vlattanzi @ 2021-01-24 23:16 | 1 | 2024-06-14 10:34 | dieterdreist | Ciao VLattanzi, ti prego di non inserire l'altezza come name (ad esempio name=862), che non è il nome e crea problemi. Il tag "ele" è giusto.Grazie,Martin |
| 71413747 by fayor @ 2019-06-19 19:09 | 1 | 2021-10-09 21:45 | dieterdreist | aggiornamento attrazioni, su quale base? Vedo tantissime cancellazioni per un'aggiornamento. Raso a suolo e ricostruito, con tags come amenity=tourism? |
| 2 | 2024-06-08 22:52 | dieterdreist | e mai avuto risposte... | |
| 148955218 by TakeshiKovac @ 2024-03-21 10:47 | 1 | 2024-06-08 22:44 | dieterdreist | another "little adjustment" where you deleted a driveway. Can you please explain why you deleted this way? |
| 2 | 2024-06-08 22:50 | dieterdreist | Just wanted to let you know that I reverted this changeset completely, but I would still like to ask you to answer why you deleted these ways. | |
| 149816823 by TakeshiKovac @ 2024-04-10 12:08 | 1 | 2024-06-08 22:30 | dieterdreist | Hi TakeshiKovac, I just notice in your "little adjustment" you deleted Piazza Fiume. Can you please be more careful in your editing?Thank you,DD |
| 139478574 by TakeshiKovac @ 2023-08-05 12:57 | 1 | 2024-06-08 08:43 | dieterdreist | Hello, I just noticed you moved the actual border of the Bioparco here from the position I have meticulously surveyed on the ground to a position that I do not think is credible, because it results in the centro Nuovi Orizzonti to be inside the Bioparco. Can you please share the sources of your edit... |
| 106271378 by AntMadeira @ 2021-06-13 05:14 | 1 | 2024-05-30 09:58 | dieterdreist | Hi, it seems unconventional to promote a town with less than 9000 population to "city", referring to Fátima: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/563655196/ |
| 2 | 2024-05-30 11:10 | AntMadeira ♦243 | Hi dieterdreist.In Portugal, cities, towns and villages are mapped according to the law, not according to population, which is not easily verifiable and has big ambiguities compared to other countries.In this case, Fátima is a city and that's why it is mapped this way.You can hav... | |
| 3 | 2024-05-30 12:10 | dieterdreist | The law does not define the meaning of the city tag in OpenStreetMap, I don’t question that you should tag legal settings if they are useful for the context, but I think if the implication would be to map European towns with 8800 population as place=city then the place value is not the right p... | |
| 4 | 2024-05-30 12:20 | AntMadeira ♦243 | The law is a verifiable way of mapping a city, because its classification derives from the existence of a list of pre-conditions that defines what a city is.In Portugal, "city" is translated to "cidade", "town" to "vila", "village" to "aldeia&... | |
| 5 | 2024-05-30 12:32 | dieterdreist | It seems, cidade can also be translated to town, according to the context the correct translation may be town in many instances. It is not possible, unfortunately, to assume that the English idea of town translates perfectly to the exact same concept in other languages, often you cannot translate th... | |
| 6 | 2024-05-30 12:38 | dieterdreist | back to OSM, I think you should indeed record the fact a settlement is considered cidade, vila (which by the way can also mean town or village, according to context) or aldeia (or more), but not in the place tag, it would go against its definition. You can find it here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.or... | |
| 7 | 2024-05-30 12:46 | AntMadeira ♦243 | Yes, the English idea of town is very blurry in other countries, even in the USA, but the translation is adequate (I'm a professional translator) and the equivalence is also correct in Portuguese terms.The Portuguese community approved a verifiable scheme that hierarchizes the place tag accor... | |
| 146855201 by Bobbi123 @ 2024-01-30 09:25 | 1 | 2024-03-06 20:28 | bigbug21 ♦147 | Mir fiel gerade auf, dass du die Bahnstreckentags der "Gredl" entfernt hast. Das passt so nicht. Die Strecke ist weitgehend zumindest in ihrer Linienführung erkennbar, oft auch noch durch Schotter und einigen Hektometersteinen. Damit wäre sie als railway=abandoned zu taggen (sieh... |
| 2 | 2024-03-07 15:00 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Hallo, ich bin hier anderer Meinung und es gibt dazu derzeit auch eine generelle Diskussion in der Community dazu, wo es teils sehr unterschiedliche Meinungen dazu gibt.: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/open-railway-map-route-in-josm-nicht-editierbar-nicht-angezeigt/109022/288Hier wurde di... | |
| 3 | 2024-03-07 21:49 | bigbug21 ♦147 | Danke für die schnelle Nachricht. Ich habe inzwischen gesehen, dass du auch diverse weitere Bahnstrecken bzw. Eisenbahn-Infrastruktur entfernt hast, die vor Ort definitiv noch sichtbar ist. Ich melde mich dazu noch separat.Im vorliegenden Fall hast du eine Strecke entfernt, die in weiten Te... | |
| 4 | 2024-05-09 12:02 | bigbug21 ♦147 | Nachdem keine weitere Reaktion kam, ist die Löschung nun zurückgenommen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151096516) | |
| 5 | 2024-05-10 16:43 | streckenkundler ♦1,042 | @bigbug21 Ich teile deine Sichtweise. | |
| 6 | 2024-05-10 22:53 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Peter: Es gab hier eine klare Empfehlung der DWG und die gilt es hier zu achten und beachten. Dazu noch noch viele lange Diskussionen, wo die Befürworter dieser Streckeneintragungen nicht stichhaltig nachweisen konnten, dass ihre Sichtweise korrekt ist.Und Streckenkundler hat sich hier mitt... | |
| 7 | 2024-05-11 08:14 | micha_k ♦44 | Ich finde schon, dass man hier unterscheiden muss. Die Bahndämme (und Einschnitte) ehemaliger Bahnstrecken sind häufig markante Objekte, die man draußen deutlich sehen und als ehemalige Bahnstrecke erkennen kann. Selbst wenn auf dem Bahndamm ein Rad- oder Feldweg gebaut wurde, erkenn... | |
| 8 | 2024-05-11 10:49 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Es gan dazu in den letzten Monaten einige ausufernder Diskussionen dazu, wo sich herausgestellt hat, dass deine Sichtweise so nicht korrekt ist. Wenn z.B. auf einer abgebrochenen Bahnstrecke heute ein Radweg ist, stellt dies klar eine andere Nutzung dar, weshalb das Mapping als razed oder abandoned ... | |
| 9 | 2024-05-11 14:47 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Ich habe deinen unbegründeten Revert wieder zurückgesetzt. Solltest du es erneut revertieren, werde ich dich melden! Irgendwann ist wie gesagt mal Schluss. | |
| 10 | 2024-05-14 10:50 | bigbug21 ♦147 | Hallo Bobbi123,ich habe mir deinen eingangs verlinkten Beitragsbaum durchgesehen und schließe mich dem auch in [1] geäußerten Wunsch an, zunächst darzulegen, welche Entscheidung der DWG du konkret meinst. Wie bereits eingangs dargelegt, ist der von dir gelöschte Bahnst... | |
| 11 | 2024-05-14 13:56 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Noch bestehende Dämme und Einschnitte reichen aber nicht für das Mappen als abgerissene Bahnstrecke. Viel eher können sie ggf. als "man_made" getaggt werden, aber definitiv nicht mehr als Bahnstrecken. Denn dafür müsste noch wenigstens ein Bisschen was der eisenbah... | |
| 12 | 2024-05-14 20:02 | bigbug21 ♦147 | Hallo Bobbi123,vielen Dank für deine schnelle Antwort. Mit dem nun konkreten Verweis auf die Argumentation eines DWG-Mitglieds kommen wir weiter. Im Kern: "'Bahnstrecken, deren Verlauf auch für einen nicht-Bahn-Experten noch erkennbar ist, können als razed oder abandoned... | |
| 13 | 2024-05-15 00:45 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Nein, in der klaren Empfehlung der DWG steht eindeutig.: "Bahnstrecken, die komplett überbaut sind, haben in OSM nichts zu suchen, weder als razed, noch als abandoned, noch als un-getaggter Teil einer Relation "damit keine Lücken entstehen"."Und da, wo heute der Gre... | |
| 14 | 2024-05-17 18:43 | bigbug21 ♦147 | Hallo Bobbi123,es ist unstrittig, dass Abschnitte, die nicht mehr erkennbar sind, auch in OSM nicht erfasst werden sollten.Unklar ist bereits, wie Frederik Ramm "überbaut" meint. Mir scheint, es geht ihm insbesondere um Gebäude. Aber wie steht es um Fälle wie den Vor... | |
| 15 | 2024-05-18 08:42 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Der von dir unter [2] verlinkte Bereich ist ein Allerwelts-Weg mit etwas Schotter, wie es sehr viele andere auch dort gibt, wo keine Bahngleise verlaufen sind. Ein Alleinstellungsmerkmaal, was den Weg auf diese Weise tagging-würdig erscheinen lässt, ist nicht gegeben. Und sowas wurde auch ... | |
| 16 | 2024-05-20 20:38 | bigbug21 ♦147 | Hallo Bobbi123,zum Verständnis für den weiteren Weg: Wenn weder ein nicht anderweitig genutzter, deutlich sichtbarer und deutlich "geschotterter" Bahndamm oder noch erhaltene Signale, Hektometersteine und andere Elemente aus deiner Sicht taggingwürdig sind, welche Vorausse... | |
| 17 | 2024-05-21 00:20 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Das wurde alles bereits an den verlinkten Stellen ausgiebig diskutiert - mal wieder. Und die OSM-Vorgaben sind dazu sehr klar beschrieben und bewusst hoch gehalten.Ich weiß nicht, was das soll, dass dies immer wieder erneut in Frage gestellt wird. Es ist einfach mal zu akzeptieren und da d... | |
| 18 | 2024-05-21 19:48 | streckenkundler ♦1,042 | Es gibt aber kein Lösung, keinen Kompromiss... Was ich dir bei dem Thema schon lange versuche beizubringen: die allgemeine und WELTWEITE Verwendung ist eine andere, als das, was du ins Wiki hinein zu interpretieren versuchen! Die allgemeine Verwendung und Akzeptanz liegt darin, was du nicht m... | |
| 19 | 2024-05-22 16:58 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Wenn du mit mir sachlich und ehrlich diskutieren willst, dann gerne. Aber mit jemanden, der hier (und schon früher woanders) Vandalismus vorwirft, nur weil es jemand persönlich anderer Meinung ist, diskutiere ich nicht.Was du hier machst geht wie schonmal gesagt klar in Richtung §... | |
| 20 | 2024-05-23 18:44 | bigbug21 ♦147 | Hallo Bobbi123,um auf deinen vorletzten Beitrag zurückzukommen: Auch nach nochmaliger Durchsicht der von dir eingangs angeführten Diskussion [1] sowie dem angeführten Changeset-Kommentar von Frederik-Ramm [2] ist mir nicht klar, warum selbsta) Bereiche auf Bahndämmen noch d... | |
| 21 | 2024-05-23 20:21 | bigbug21 ♦147 | Nachtrag: Nachdem sich die Diskussion, wie ich vorhin erst nach einem Reload sah, erheblich weitergedreht hat (u. a. [1]) hat sich meine voriger Kommentar erst einmal erledigt.[1] https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/open-railway-map-route-in-josm-nicht-editierbar-nicht-angezeigt/109022/314 | |
| 22 | 2024-05-25 00:22 | dieterdreist | ich denke nicht, dass §186 StGB (Üble Nachrede) hier Relevanz hat, es kommt höchstens §185 StGB in Frage, der 186 ist für Fälle wo das Gesagte Unwahr ist. | |
| 147128761 by damianeue @ 2024-02-06 10:25 | 1 | 2024-05-21 15:28 | dieterdreist | this changeset is discussed here:https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/revert-bulk-deletes-of-addresses-on-poi/113542 |
| 125452995 by ma-rt-in @ 2022-08-27 18:31 | 1 | 2024-05-19 21:05 | dieterdreist | Hallo, habe gesehen dass du beim Bundespräsidialamt government=legislative getaggt hast, das ist aber falsch, weil der Bundespräsident als Staatsoberhaupt auch Chef der Exekutive ist. GrußMartin |
| 150150813 by Mike Ortega @ 2024-04-17 23:02 | 1 | 2024-05-03 11:43 | dieterdreist | Hello, I can imagine someone thinking that after 20 years of mapping we still forgot to map the vatican city, because it is so tiny, but actually it was already mapped, so this is a duplicate. For this reason I have removed the node. |
| 48818779 by radek-drlicka @ 2017-05-19 11:23 | 1 | 2024-05-03 07:20 | dieterdreist | Hi, you have added a German name here which does not make any sense. Please only add names for languages which you know.Thank youMartin |
| 150590640 by valestarkiller @ 2024-04-27 17:45 | 1 | 2024-04-29 07:53 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno Valestarkiller, e benvenuto in OpenStreetMap. Ho notato che hai inserito 3 nuovi parchi in estensione del Parco Marconi. Queste parti nuovi sono già accessibili? Generalmente, la soluzione se la risposta fosse sì, sarebbe di estendere il parco già mappato e non la cre... |
| 131395530 by Claudio Tam @ 2023-01-17 20:35 | 1 | 2024-04-24 17:23 | dieterdreist | Buonasera Claudio, ti segnalo questa nota: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3743078salutiMartin |
| 2 | 2024-04-24 17:33 | Claudio Tam ♦20 | Ciao!È una stanza di passaggio impianti, contatori, passaggio materiali; secondo me room=technical, building=service è lo schema di tagging migliore, quindi con building inside building, si; però se ci sono altre proposte di schemi, si può valutare e modificare. | |
| 3 | 2024-04-24 17:37 | dieterdreist | building=* non si applica, quindi non può essere il tagging migliore. Se non esiste un tag bisogna inventarlo. | |
| 4 | 2024-04-30 09:04 | Claudio Tam ♦20 | ok! elimino building=service e lascio room=technical da solo. | |
| 150438362 by ceseprova @ 2024-04-24 10:34 | 1 | 2024-04-24 16:07 | dieterdreist | Buonasera Ceseprova,e benvenuto in OSM, anche se ci sei già da qualche tempo, ma non ci siamo mai incrociati finora. Ti vorrei segnalare questa pagina del wiki, che spiega perché i commenti alle modifiche che carichi sono importanti: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_chan... |
| 145107286 by ivanbranco @ 2023-12-14 11:07 | 1 | 2024-04-18 21:39 | dieterdreist | Questo è uno sforzo veramente lodevole, comunque mi sembrerebbe quasi meglio togliere tutto il farmland e cominciare a disegnare farmland "veri"Un saluto! |
| 149843868 by Friendly_Ghost @ 2024-04-11 01:38 | 1 | 2024-04-11 20:45 | silversurfer83 ♦3,420 | And again you removed hundreds of POIs from the map.Please stop that and discuss this first. |
| 2 | 2024-04-12 08:57 | otji73 ♦18 | It is incredibly time-consuming to try to understand your changes.It should always be the time in life to upload changes related to the local aspect. | |
| 3 | 2024-04-12 13:26 | dieterdreist | While it saves you the hazzle, it makes other people's life harder. Please respect the rules we have set up for automated edits, you should discuss this first, then upload changesets with limited spatial extent. | |
| 4 | 2024-04-13 18:51 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | 1. How does it make people's lives harder? 2. As I wrote in the CS comment this isn't an automated edit.3. Spatial extent isn't a concern with a thematically simple edit that isn't so big in scale.4. These are guidelines, not rules. | |
| 5 | 2024-04-14 08:07 | dieterdreist | It makes their life harder because it gets into their way together with all the other wide spanning edits, so that it is harder to find local edits. Guidelines ARE rules. | |
| 6 | 2024-04-14 14:41 | gurglypipe ♦873 | Other people review edits. Review tools such as osmcha.org only allow edits to be marked as “good” or “bad” once. That means that whoever reviews your edit has to either review all 100+ POIs, spread across the world, with no local knowledge — or to review the ones they ... | |
| 7 | 2024-04-14 19:35 | ablevi202 ♦41 | I would infinitely rather look at one large changeset when reviewing than track down every single local changeset someone makes. Trying to force an interpretation of non-binding guidelines with no consensus to it because of osmcha's limitations doesn't really make sense either. | |
| 8 | 2024-04-14 20:04 | gurglypipe ♦873 | You’re saying there’s no consensus to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets? | |
| 9 | 2024-04-14 20:10 | ablevi202 ♦41 | There is no consensus to the idea that all large changeset bboxes are bad and should not be allowed. It even says there's no consensus on optimal bbox size, just that ideally changesets are local and not super big. In practice, world spanning changesets are normal and I don't know why peop... | |
| 10 | 2024-04-14 21:22 | maro21 ♦714 | > 1. How does it make people's lives harder?In most countries they see your changeset, they read this discussion, but they don't know if anything has changed in their city. | |
| 11 | 2024-04-14 21:57 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | @maro21 That's a tech issue, not a mapping issue | |
| 12 | 2024-04-14 22:01 | gurglypipe ♦873 | The way you do your mapping has to fit in with the capabilities of the available tools. You are knowingly creating tedious work for other people. | |
| 13 | 2024-04-14 23:10 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | there are other tools than just the osm.org history viewer, which are much more fit for purpose, for example https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=149843868 or custom filters on https://osmcha.org/. Complaining to mappers each time they make a big bbox isn't going to improve OSM ... | |
| 14 | 2024-04-15 04:04 | silversurfer83 ♦3,420 | Most people are missing the point that a "cleanup" of this scale needs to be discussed first.Also, disused shops can and should be mapped and should not be removed completely. This change here and the other subsequent changes in the same manner need to be reverted in my view. | |
| 15 | 2024-04-15 09:38 | dieterdreist | @ablevi202 "I would infinitely rather look at one large changeset when reviewing than track down every single local changeset someone makes."If I were to track all changes by a certain user, then yes, but what people do (and what makes most sense, given that everybody is an expert locall... | |
| 16 | 2024-04-15 09:39 | dieterdreist | @silversurfer83 "This change here and the other subsequent changes in the same manner need to be reverted in my view.", fully agree, can you write to the DWG? | |
| 17 | 2024-04-15 09:49 | Kovirii ♦30 | Hello, Please do not automatically remove tags such as "old_name" and "name." This removes useful information used by both mappers and the public. Additionally, how did you determine it was correct to delete "shop=vacant?"As seen here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-his... | |
| 18 | 2024-04-15 09:56 | Kovirii ♦30 | Hello again,I see that you completely deleted certain ways, without local knowledge. This makes them difficult to restore, or requires other editors to recreate them. Please do not do this.https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=149843868#3/46.32/-103.27 - Kovirii | |
| 19 | 2024-04-15 10:39 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | @Kovirii I agree with your latest update of way 437189759. That said, keeping outdated name=...(closed) on objects would be unhelpful in most cases. An exception I can think of is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373633500, where the words "Ex Cinema" are literally on a sign on the buildi... | |
| 20 | 2024-04-16 00:31 | Kovirii ♦30 | @Friendly_GhostI don't see how removing sites that are currently still vacant, and have not been redeveloped is "turning OSM into OHM." If they had been redeveloped, and the way was dating back decades I would be inclined to agree. However, St. Catherine's Indian School is st... | |
| 21 | 2024-04-16 08:30 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150071599 for two reasons:One is that it's essentially impossible to QA deletions in a worldwide changeset as there are no coordinates for deletion in the XML.Another is that some actions taken here (for example on https://w... | |
| 22 | 2024-04-16 09:29 | dieterdreist | Thank you, SomeoneElse! | |
| 23 | 2024-04-16 15:34 | ablevi202 ♦41 | No, strongly disagree. Reverting this was a terrible decision. Also how is that example surely wrong? I don't see what's wrong with it. | |
| 24 | 2024-04-16 21:53 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | @ablevi202 Taking https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684681276/history as an example, how is someone local to that area even supposed to know that the way was deleted in this changeset? How do we find out what it is now? An "amenity=school" way with a name of "Blackshear School (CLOS... | |
| 25 | 2024-04-16 22:01 | ablevi202 ♦41 | If its not actually a school anymore then why go out of your way to preserve it? The map shouldn't be made worse just so local mappers can find obvious errors easier. Having no data is much better than bunk data, someone can also see there's nothing there on the map and go look for it. Loc... | |
| 26 | 2024-04-17 12:35 | Kovirii ♦30 | The map is not "being made worse." It's not "turning into OHM" either. If "having no data is much better," why are life cycle prefixes in widespread use? The goal should not be to return the state of OSM back to 2006. Instead add a fixme tag, add a note, make a pos... | |
| 27 | 2024-04-17 13:17 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | This sort of discussion (all sides of it) would actually be a good one to have over at https://community.openstreetmap.org/ ! | |
| 28 | 2024-04-17 14:54 | ablevi202 ♦41 | If there's literally nothing there anymore it should be deleted from the database. Removing things that no longer exist does make the map better. If someone is too lazy to check what's deleted that's entirely on them for choosing to not do qa work that's all on them, no one shoul... | |
| 29 | 2024-04-17 15:12 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | In the example I quoted, we don't know whether there is "literally nothing there anymore". The imagery available to OSM suggests that actually there IS something still there; which just don't know what. | |
| 30 | 2024-04-17 15:15 | ablevi202 ♦41 | I meant no longer whats currently on the map, sorry. | |
| 31 | 2024-04-19 20:00 | maro21 ♦714 | > Complaining to mappers each time they make a big bbox isn't going to improve OSM in any way. You can direct those complaints to the OWG and ask them to implement better tools on the website.Friendly_Ghost: Regardless of the tools available to check the changes, the community decided th... | |
| 32 | 2024-04-19 21:03 | ablevi202 ♦41 | The community has not decided that worldwide changesets are banned, let alone ones that are only several continents. | |
| 33 | 2024-04-19 23:41 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | @maro21, I concur with ablevi here. There's no consensus on this, and there are some very good cases for large bboxes.But if you really think your POV is the only right one, you can plead your case over at the OWG and ask them to block all changesets with a huge bbox. I'm sure they can... | |
| 34 | 2024-04-20 06:26 | silversurfer83 ♦3,420 | This is not about the nuisance of large bboxes. They are discouraged but not forbidden.This is about the removal of totally information on a large scale! This goes against OTG, keep the history, mass edits, ... guidelines and therefore needs to stop. | |
| 35 | 2024-04-20 13:09 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | maro21 was complaining about bboxes, so that's what I was commenting on. | |
| 149839662 by el_emka @ 2024-04-10 21:26 | 1 | 2024-04-12 13:30 | dieterdreist | please make and upload local changes. You should not upload edits in the Netherlands together with edits in Melbourne. |
| 2 | 2024-04-12 13:35 | el_emka ♦7 | Sorry, this was no deliberate action as I was misguided by the app settings, which stated that all updates are uploaded immediately. It didn't state that they would still be part of the same changeset. | |
| 3 | 2024-04-12 15:08 | dieterdreist | no worries, I just thought I'd point it out to you (because I was trying to analyze local changes and your changeset appeared), but you were by far not the only one. Have fun mapping :) | |
| 122702646 by Claudio Tam @ 2022-06-22 09:32 | 1 | 2024-04-11 09:35 | dieterdreist | Ciao Claudio,ti vorrei segnalare che questo tipo di relazione non va bene per come funzional OSM ("relations are not categories"). (riferendomi a lista dei 35 "Quartieri" di Roma), anche se ammetto ha una sua commodità. Il modo "giusto" sarebbe concordare dei t... |
| 2 | 2024-04-11 10:45 | Claudio Tam ♦20 | Ciao Martin!Concordo totalmente. | |
| 3 | 2024-04-11 21:51 | dieterdreist | ottimo. In realtà penso si possa discutere in questo caso, perché forse assimilabile alle relazioni amministrative, vedo un vantaggio che la relazione evidenza il concetto (chi vede un membro nell’editore capisce meglio che sia stato fatto appositamente e che si tratta di un conc... | |
| 4 | 2024-04-11 21:56 | dieterdreist | forse riusciamo a documentare un tipo di relazione specifico oppure una combinazione di tag generici che ci consentono dire che sia un quartiere, una rione oppure una zona. Una relazione ha senso per i singoli componenti per poter riutilizzare i ways. | |
| 149564289 by EtVal @ 2024-04-04 10:54 Active block | 1 | 2024-04-04 17:36 | dieterdreist | this looks very much like vandalism and should likely be reverted |
| 2 | 2024-04-05 08:41 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | User is blocked and all edits have been reverted.https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15923Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 3 | 2024-04-05 08:54 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149603227 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism. | |
| 116351557 by SekeRob @ 2022-01-19 17:17 | 1 | 2024-03-18 12:12 | dieterdreist-CAI ♦33 | Ciao Sekerob, riferito a questa relazione: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13187841/ vorrei ricordare il principio "KISS" (usare il metodo più semplice possibile), perché in questo caso, non ci sono legami tra i vari farmland, potrebbero essere benissimo oggetti indipe... |
| 2 | 2024-03-18 13:39 | SekeRob ♦1,435 | Hi Martin,Really, so how did you get to this one, according my daily log somewhere on the 18-19th jan 2022. That was being led by example and by the nose of a 'I have been here many years' mapper who resides somewhere in the L'Aquila region. Stopped doing that roundabout 2 years a... | |
| 3 | 2024-03-18 14:26 | dieterdreist | Hi, I found it by chance just rightclicking on a farmland and discovered it was a multipart multipolygon. I think using multipolygon relations to avoid overlapping ways is ok, but if there is no reason to combine several areas in one object (because they are something together), like here, it is bet... | |
| 4 | 2024-03-18 14:29 | dieterdreist | oh, and thank you for splitting these multipolygons generally, sorry for barking up the wrong tree :) | |
| 137804801 by dieterdreist @ 2023-06-26 18:42 | 1 | 2024-03-17 15:29 | NVBW_Seifert ♦24 | Hallo dieterdreist,Du hast in diesem Changeset den Aufzug zu Bahnsteg 5/6 als deaktiviert durch setzen von disused:highway=elevator.Laut DB Fasta-API ist der Aufzug aktuell in Betrieb.Wurde der im letzten Jahr erneuert oder aus welchem anderen Grund hast Du den letztes Jahr deaktiviert? |
| 2 | 2024-03-18 12:31 | dieterdreist-CAI ♦33 | ob er erneuert wurde weiß ich nicht, aber als ich dort war konnte man ihn nicht benutzen, ausser Betrieb. Habe ich damals vor Ort festgestellt. M.E. sollte man nicht der API trauen sondern vor Ort nachsehen, ob der Aufzug jetzt wieder funktioniert, was ja gut sein kann. Mein Zug ist damals auc... | |
| 3 | 2024-03-18 12:31 | dieterdreist | sorry, vom falschen Account geantwortet | |
| 145632352 by fayor @ 2023-12-28 18:28 | 1 | 2024-03-06 06:31 | Đuro Jiří ♦284 | Ciao fayor,ho notato che già qualche anno ( almeno quattro anni) stai cancellando informazioni aggiunte con applicazione StreetComplete (soprattutto accesso ai disabili, piste ciclabili,corsie, superficie stradale). Strano che nessuno ancora non è notato questo VANDALISMO. Chiedo cort... |
| 2 | 2024-03-06 15:08 | fayor ♦125 | Te lo scrivo una volta soltanto, sperando di non dovertelo ripetere: puoi non essere d'accordo sul mio modo di mappare ma non chiamarlo vandalismo, che sicuramente non sai di cosa parli. È buona regola di mappatura quello di non aggiungere informazioni superflue, che sono inutili e appes... | |
| 3 | 2024-03-07 11:30 | dieterdreist | sulla questione di default non esiste un consenso nel progetto. Il problema è che non avendo una informazione non si sa mai se era inteso il "default" oppure nessuno ha ancora verificato e inserito questa informazione. | |
| 4 | 2024-03-07 11:33 | dieterdreist | comunque, "cycleway:right=no" senza nessun altro tag sulle infrastrutture e legalità ciclistiche, non mi sembra un buon tag, in questi casi sono d'accordo con Fayor: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172093526/history | |
| 5 | 2024-03-07 12:48 | canfe ♦1,117 | E invece no, è giusto dire che NON c'è una certa cosa. A patto che lo si possa evincere da immagini satellitari o survey sul posto. | |
| 6 | 2024-03-07 13:45 | amadvance ♦72 | Premetto che mi pare decisamente fuori luogo iniziare un discussione accusando di vandalismo un mappatore che, bisogna sempre supporre, stia operando in buona fede per cercare di migliorare il database. Non è il modo migliore per iniziare una discussione proficua.Riguardo invece al merito... | |
| 7 | 2024-03-08 09:49 | catonano ♦27 | E' vero che non assumere la buona fede non è il modo migliore di aprire una discussioneCredo sia una differenza di assuntiDuro assume che i suoi contributi (che assolvono al suo caso d'uso specifico) siano legittimi e non sia necessario conquistare il consenso sul suo caso d... | |
| 8 | 2024-06-17 11:07 | Đuro Jiří ♦284 | Ciao fayor,penso che mi devi spiegare ancora una volta, perché stai sempre cancellando informazioni utili aggiunti da altri utenti con applicazione StreetComplete. Se alcuni informazioni, secondo te, sono inutili, sicuramente sono utili per OSM. Non stai facendo una mappa "propria"... | |
| 148006287 by ADAC Kartographie @ 2024-02-28 10:08 | 1 | 2024-03-01 09:14 | Mammi71 ♦253 | Hallo ADAC,die Schreibweise von Kiew/Kyjiw ist in OSM genauso stark diskutiert wie auf Wikipedia. Die Bundesregierung via Auswärtiges Amt kann die Schreibweise für Bundesbehörden und Regierungsstellen vorschreiben. OSM bildet jedoch in name:de nicht begriffsbildend gewünschte... |
| 2 | 2024-03-01 10:23 | dieterdreist | Danke Mammi71, ergänzend geht es beim deutschen Namen um die deutsche Sprache, nicht um die amtliche Variante der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, es gibt noch mehrere andere Länder in denen Deutsch ebenfalls die offizielle Sprache ist, z.B. Österreich, Schweiz, Luxemburg, Italien (Sü... | |
| 3 | 2024-03-01 10:24 | dieterdreist | es für amtliche Schreibweisen den tag "official_name" | |
| 4 | 2024-03-01 10:32 | ADAC Kartographie ♦8 | Hallo zusammen, danke für euren Input. Ich habe meine Änderungen wieder rückgängig gemacht und die Bezeichnung Kyjiw unter official_name:de eingetragen (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148090189). | |
| 5 | 2024-03-01 10:35 | dieterdreist | danke, das ging schnell! | |
| 146867478 by LightSpirit @ 2024-01-30 14:56 | 1 | 2024-02-25 17:07 | dieterdreist | Hallo LightSpirit, habe gesehen dass Du hier ein Betretungsverbot getaggt hast, irgendwie scheint das nicht zu den anderen tags zu passen, war das Absicht? |
| 114892253 by granpasso811 @ 2021-12-13 17:42 | 1 | 2024-02-12 11:24 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno, ho notato che way 1011834469 è inserito in modo che vieta il transito per pedoni, ma allo stesso momento fa parte di una route turistica per pedoni. Forse manca un foot=yes / designated? Oppure si dovrebbe mettere bicycle=yes invece di designated?SalutiMartin |
| 2 | 2024-02-12 17:42 | granpasso811 ♦14 | Buonasera, sì a mio parere dovrebbe essere bicycle=yes.Saluti | |
| 3 | 2024-02-12 23:18 | dieterdreist | grazie, ho cambiato questo e nel seguito da bicycle=designated in bicycle=yes | |
| 114795188 by granpasso811 @ 2021-12-10 18:36 | 1 | 2024-02-12 13:02 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno granpasso, ho notato che qui hai rimosso il tag "route=hiking" senza sostituirlo eventualmente con un'altro, non è una route hiking?Saluti,M |
| 2 | 2024-02-12 17:38 | granpasso811 ♦14 | Buonasera, questa variante dell'IFF è intransitabile per numerosi alberi crollati e non è stata oggetto dei lavori di ripristino del Cai di Chiavari per i 700 anni dalla morte di Dante come invece il tracciato principale. Si potrebbe anche cancellare, di sicuro non lo farei risult... | |
| 3 | 2024-02-12 17:51 | granpasso811 ♦14 | Aggiungo che coincideva in parte con il sentiero "quadrato rosso" che una volta partiva da Neirone. Lo stato di abbandono ha portato la fie a spostare la partenza a Corsiglia.https://www.fieliguria.com/images/Sentieri-Zone-GENOVA/Zona5/Sentieri-GE-Zona-05.pdf | |
| 4 | 2024-02-13 11:49 | dieterdreist-CAI ♦33 | Grazie per la risposta, in realtà penso togliere route=hiking non sia il migliore approcchio al tema, perché descrive che la route è del tipo escursionismo (e non trasporto pubblico o altro). Se non è utilizzabile si potrebbe descrivere il problema con un tag "descri... | |
| 75303927 by Michele Aquilani @ 2019-10-04 21:00 | 1 | 2019-11-18 15:41 | dieterdreist | Hi, I have seen you have changed a lot of "crossing=zebra" which I have surveyed and which are actually zebra crossings, into "crossing=marked". Can you explain why you did it and why you believe this is not a loss of information? |
| 2 | 2019-11-18 15:46 | dieterdreist | Sorry, I am taking this mostly back (most of these are in Version 1 and not changes). Still, I do not understand why you have been using the undefined (undocumented) tag crossing=marked for what apparently are zebra crossings? | |
| 3 | 2024-02-11 19:34 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele, ho notato che hai rimosso shop=pastry dalla pasticceria Desideri e hai rimosso amenity=bar e messo amenity=cafe, ma si tratta di una pasticceria, in inverno non ci sono tavoli (e in estate pochi) e non esiste servizio, non è in nessuno modo un "cafe". Ci sei mai stato? | |
| 100942878 by Paolo58 @ 2021-03-13 07:02 | 1 | 2024-02-09 13:46 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno Paolo, ho notato che hai modificato per way 776231297 la modalità di accesso da bicycle=yes in bicycle=destinated. Questo comporta che il sentiero non è più accessibile ai pedoni. Servirebbe probabilmente anche un foot=yes oppure foot=designated (il percorso fa anche ... |
| 2 | 2024-02-09 13:47 | dieterdreist | scusa, volevo scrivere "designated" | |
| 146385291 by Bobbi123 @ 2024-01-18 00:30 | 1 | 2024-02-07 08:14 | dieterdreist | Hallo Bobbi123, offenbar gibt es noch erkennbare Spuren der Bahnlinie die du hier gelöscht hast? |
| 2 | 2024-02-07 10:22 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Wenn es als Frage gemeint ist: Aus meiner Sicht nein.Wenn es also Feststellung gemeint ist: Wo genau sollen diese sein? | |
| 3 | 2024-02-07 12:59 | dieterdreist | es war die Interpretation von “als solche erkennbar”, im Forum wurde gesagt: Zum Beispiel der alte Bahnhof Kinding und die Bahnbrücke Kipfenberg. Außerdem ist der Bahndamm, teils mit Stützmauern, in weiten Teilen erhalten (zum Großteil mit Gebüsch überwuch... | |
| 4 | 2024-02-07 13:33 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Meinst du da im Forum, wo du mich erstmal beschimpft hast? Sehr seltsames Vorgehen, wenn man sachlich diskutieren möchte... | |
| 5 | 2024-02-08 11:17 | dieterdreist | Beschimpfen würde ich das nicht nennen, ich gebe aber zu, dass man es auch anders hätte ausdrücken können und habe daher eine Alternativformulierung angeboten. Bei Löschgedanken hinsichtlich solcher Objekte in die sichtbar Herzblut geflossen ist, würde ich mir eigentlic... | |
| 6 | 2024-02-08 11:18 | dieterdreist | fehlt ein "nicht" im letzten Satz | |
| 7 | 2024-02-08 14:43 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Wie du das nennst und ob du jetzt eine „Alternativformulierung“ dort gemacht hast, macht es auch nicht mehr rückgängig. Es war und ist eine klare Beschimpfung von dir gegen mich und da erwarte ich eine unmissverständliche Entschuldigung von dir. Ansonsten hat jede weitere ... | |
| 8 | 2024-02-08 16:37 | dieterdreist | Mein letzter Stand zu Bahnen ist, dass man die mappen kann auch wenn sie um- oder rückgebaut sind, solange es noch Spuren gibt anhand derer man sie erkennen kann, und gerade eben beim Thema Bahnfans war die Linie in OpenStreetMap immer tolerant, weil es eben auch nicht so viele davon gibt dass ... | |
| 9 | 2024-02-08 17:51 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Wie gesagt: Ohne Entschuldigung von dir keine weitere Diskussion. | |
| 10 | 2024-02-08 18:06 | dieterdreist | mehr Entschuldigung als das Klarstellen des Ausdrucks "auf die Finger klopfen" ist nicht drin, ich verstehe nicht, wo du die Beschimpfung siehst. Wenn Du das so erklären kannst dass ich es verstehe werde ich nochmal drüber nachdenken. Ehrlich gesagt war der Ausdruck "Lö... | |
| 11 | 2024-02-09 00:24 | Bobbi123 ♦119 | Du verstehst es einfach nicht… | |
| 147089907 by ayesha-abid @ 2024-02-05 11:35 | 1 | 2024-02-05 15:55 | BCNorwich ♦4,857 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for your recent addition of info to the database. I've reverted the road status to residential, as it's not a trunk road.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-02-05 19:06 | dieterdreist | Actually you did not it seems (maybe some problem with the upload?), so I did now.Cheers,Martin | |
| 3 | 2024-02-05 19:14 | BCNorwich ♦4,857 | Hi Martin, Sorry for the confusion. I just now opened up JOSM and yes the change failed to upload. It was quite likely my fault though.Regards Bernard. | |
| 4 | 2024-02-05 23:05 | dieterdreist | you’re welcome :) | |
| 100792526 by Paolo58 @ 2021-03-10 17:17 | 1 | 2024-01-31 17:45 | dieterdreist | Buonasera Paolo, ho notato che hai modificato alcuni path da bicycle=yes in bicycle=designated. Questo significherebbe di escludere i pedoni, è stato l'intenzione? Perché ho notato che vi passano dei sentieri escursionistici, e mi sembra improbabile questo tipo di restrizione. S... |
| 137169299 by cepesko @ 2023-06-10 11:52 | 1 | 2023-12-14 21:37 | dieterdreist | Hi, zufällig auf diesen Baum gestoßen, vielleicht ein Fall für natural=tree_stump oder gibt es keinen Stumpf?Gruß Martin |
| 145052153 by chris66 @ 2023-12-12 20:17 | 1 | 2023-12-13 08:41 | dieterdreist | Hallo Chris66,Sehe gerade, dass du mit dem Kommentar "Schranken werden in OSM als Attribut am level_crossing erfasst" die Schrankenposition gelöscht hast. M.E. hast Du damit Informationen aus der db entfernt, und ich habe den Eindruck, das war dir auch klar, ober was sollte der tag ... |
| 140679996 by saldenisov @ 2023-09-01 13:29 | 1 | 2023-12-07 13:55 | dieterdreist | Hi, I noticed you changed the name from "Flughafengefängnis" to "Zentrum für ausländerrechtliche Administrativhaft". Did you try to contact the original mappers? Are you aware we prefer ground truth to official status? It seems this could be a case for "offici... |
| 141005887 by dieterdreist @ 2023-09-08 23:41 | 1 | 2023-11-13 14:21 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206286187bridge=1?What is the meaning of that? |
| 2 | 2023-11-13 14:40 | dieterdreist | interestingly the tag has some historic usage http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/bridge/1but here it is a typo for yes, sorry | |
| 135672711 by Carlo Terranova @ 2023-05-03 18:36 | 1 | 2023-11-06 10:35 | dieterdreist | buongiorno Carlo, ho appena vista la tua modifica, intanto, benvenuto ad OpenStreetMap e grazie per il tuo contributo! Mi sembra c'è stato un problema perché la relazione del 673 (Rho) è rimasta in OSM, mentre quasi tutti i tag sono stati cancellati: https://www.openstreetm... |
| 2 | 2023-11-09 14:52 | Carlo Terranova ♦1 | Ciao Martin, sì quando ho fatto la modifica del 673 ero alle prime armi con OpenStreetMap, avevo visto che sulla mappa esisteva ancora questa linea che non esiste più da anni perciò ho deciso di provare a eliminarla, ma non ci sono riuscito bene, e lo fatto un po' a caso, q... | |
| 3 | 2023-11-10 13:51 | dieterdreist | figurati, grazie per la risposta! | |
| 120508883 by Dāvis Kļaviņš @ 2022-05-03 17:18 | 1 | 2023-11-08 08:34 | dieterdreist | Hi Dāvis, have a look now, the plural is clearly preferred: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=shop%3Dweighing#tags |
| 111146003 by witkoo @ 2021-09-13 13:26 | 1 | 2023-10-29 18:13 | dieterdreist | Hi witkoo, please add surface values from survey, they cannot be seen reliably on aerial imagery, e.g. I noticed you added "asphalt" to the pedestrian area in front of the Basilica San Paolo, but there are paving stones. Fixed it now.Anyway, have fun mapping :) |
| 143172717 by save2king @ 2023-10-26 17:31 | 1 | 2023-10-26 22:23 | dieterdreist | Ciao, sembra che hai cancellato 2 vie, era quello che intendevi? |
| 2 | 2023-10-26 22:30 | dieterdreist | I have reverted this changeset because it looks like vandalism. | |
| 130420944 by pboscherini @ 2022-12-23 13:01 Active block | 1 | 2023-10-11 08:09 | dieterdreist | Ciao Pboscherini, ho notato che hai aggiunto un distributore di acqua minerale acea, ottimo, cosa mi stupisce: ci sono anche tag wikipedia e wikidata che sembrano indicare si tratta di un nasone. Ho cercato di guardare la foto in "image", ma mi risponde con "Bad URL hash". Ti ric... |
| 2 | 2023-10-11 14:34 | pboscherini Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-12 09:23 | dieterdreist | Ciao Piergiorgio,purtroppo non ho uno script per cercare immagini "rotti", credo di ricordare che qualcuno abbia fatto in precedenza e pubblicato i risultati, ho cercato qui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance ma senza trovare. C'é un workflow che però... | |
| 4 | 2023-10-12 10:12 | etrumap ♦1 | Qualche tempo fa ho mappato un distributore acea così: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149904682non è necessariamente il tagging migliore, ma "funziona" senza dover storcere il significato dei tag. | |
| 5 | 2023-10-12 10:45 | pboscherini Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 6 | 2023-10-12 11:01 | pboscherini Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 7 | 2023-10-12 11:35 | dieterdreist | Ciao Piergiorgio, non sono un amministratore, sono un utente semplice come te. Di amministratori pagati ce ne sono meno di 5, credo 1-2. Se vuoi fissare il link secondome ti conviene usare un'altra soluzione dove carichi l'immagine, che offre link permanenti. | |
| 8 | 2023-10-12 11:39 | dieterdreist | > ''Rimango in attesa di una gentile proposta di pianificazione di: "lavorazione delle code broken-link per singole utenze openstreetmap.org".''per lavorare le code, mi vongono in mente due soluzioni, maproulette e task manager.https://www.maproulette.org/htt... | |
| 9 | 2023-10-12 12:22 | pboscherini Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 91048628 by Antanicus @ 2020-09-17 12:42 | 1 | 2023-10-03 10:06 | dieterdreist | Ciao Antanicus, ho notato che hai inserito questo punto con nome "Nasone", ma non capisco il tag "stand pipe", è una fontanella del tipo nasone? Suggerisco di usare il tag amenity=drinking_water insieme al tag fountain=nasone in questo caso.Saluti,Martin |
| 2 | 2023-10-11 07:24 | Antanicus ♦8 | Ciao, grazie per la segnalazione. Penso sia stata una decisione autonoma di Osmand, forse gli sviluppatori hanno deciso che un oggetto fontanella andava segnato come "stand pipe". Correggo il nodo :) | |
| 3 | 2023-10-11 07:56 | dieterdreist | ottimo, grazie! | |
| 142089181 by dieterdreist @ 2023-10-03 08:43 | 1 | 2023-10-03 14:11 | Sandal man ♦391 | Hello,Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. Why? Have a look at the section"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ChangesetThank you. |
| 2 | 2023-10-03 17:04 | dieterdreist | thank you, I’ll be more careful next time to avoid big bounding boxes. I rarely perform this kind of “gardening” anyway. Have fun mapping | |
| 57804387 by A-U-X @ 2018-04-04 13:48 | 1 | 2023-09-17 19:36 | dieterdreist | Hi, I just noticed you have duplicated the hollywood sign letters with nodes in this changeset, isn’t this duplicate information then? |
| 2 | 2023-09-19 18:33 | A-U-X ♦7 | Hi, don't know, Change it as it is correct | |
| 3 | 2023-09-19 19:16 | dieterdreist | not sure what is „correct“ :) | |
| 4 | 2023-09-20 08:28 | A-U-X ♦7 | It is assembled with lines and is not visible on the map, I added it differently, now it is visible :)) If you have a better idea, correct it :)) | |
| 5 | 2023-09-20 08:50 | dieterdreist | I think we can have either the ways or the nodes but not both. The nodes are rendered and the ways show the width, so there are arguments for both. | |
| 92987439 by Antanicus @ 2020-10-24 12:48 | 1 | 2023-09-14 15:34 | dieterdreist | Ciao, ho notato che hai aggiunto stop=minor al nodo 7995768339. Non capisco da dove viene, perché in Italia non abbiamo una legge che prevede questo tipo di stop. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:stopCiao,Martin |
| 2 | 2023-10-11 08:08 | Antanicus ♦8 | Ciao, probabilmente da un errore! :) | |
| 140196833 by dieterdreist @ 2023-08-21 19:01 | 1 | 2023-08-22 20:18 | Supaplex030 ♦397 | Hey, was meinst du denn in diesem Fall mit "abandoned=yes" am Straßenbrunnen? Ist er kaputt, unzugänglich o.ä.?(letzte Mapillary-Aufnahme: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.5379907&lng=13.4112729&z=17&focus=photo&panos=true&dateFrom=2022-01-01&am... |
| 2 | 2023-09-04 00:01 | dieterdreist | damit meine ich, dass ich dort war, und den Brunnen ausprobiert habe, und es gab keinen Widerstand an der Pumpe und es kam auch kein Wasser, selbst nach vielem Pumpen nicht. Daher gehe ich davon aus, dass der Brunnen zumindest derzeit nicht nutzbar ist um an Wasser zu gelangen. | |
| 3 | 2023-09-04 00:02 | dieterdreist | und weil das offenbar laut history schon seit mind. 2 Jahren so ist, schien mir abandoned passend. | |
| 139208153 by Ammersee Westcoast @ 2023-07-30 12:40 | 1 | 2023-07-31 08:43 | dieterdreist | access=no ist aber kein tag um die Eignung eines Weges abzubilden, vielmehr drückt das ein Verbot aus. |
| 139210750 by Hubert Wendler @ 2023-07-30 13:51 | 1 | 2023-07-30 15:00 | martinst ♦319 | In OSM wird die Wirklichkeit abgebildet, auch Traktorwege im Wald etc. können erfasst werdenDeine Löschung betrifft auch deutlich im Luftbild sichbare Fahrspuren und ist auf jeden Fall zu pauschal.Revertiert in Changeset: 139213441 |
| 2 | 2023-07-30 16:20 | Hubert Wendler ♦1 | Wir sind Revierinhaber, Jagdpächter und auch teilweise Grundstückseigentümer (Waldbesitzer) in Utting. Die in OSM dargestellten (gelöschten) Wege, sind keine Wege, sondern private Waldwege (Holzrückegassen), die auch nicht gekiest sind sondern nur Waldboden. Das mag auch im ... | |
| 3 | 2023-07-30 19:18 | mcliquid ♦1,863 | Hallo Herr Wendler, ich kann Ihren Standpunkt nachvollziehen, möchte Sie aber mit ein paar Argumenten und der richtigen Technik in OpenStreetMap dazu bewegen, die Wege in der Karte zu belassen und nur diese als "privat" zu markieren.Das Prinzip der Überprüfbarkeit (auch ... | |
| 4 | 2023-07-30 20:20 | Hubert Wendler ♦1 | Danke für das schnelle Reagieren und Ihre Antwort. Dann lassen Sie uns das mal probieren mit "privat" dann schauen wir nach 4 Wochen was passiert, bzw. ob sich das bessert. Nehme an, dass Sie diese Änderung dann vornehmen werden.Vielen Dank im Voraus | |
| 5 | 2023-07-30 23:27 | dieterdreist | Für Fußgänger darf man hier den Weg wahrscheinlich gar nicht sperren, access=private oder gar „no“ ist daher vermutlich nicht zutreffend. Zur Situation des Fahrradfahrens im Bayrischen Waldgesetz kann ich nichts sagen. | |
| 6 | 2023-07-31 06:41 | Hubert Wendler ♦1 | Frage:antworten mir hier auf dieser Ebene User / Komunity-Mitglieder (unter Alias-Namen), die eventl. selber kartiert haben und weiterhin gerne solche privaten "Nicht-Wege" benutzen wollen, oder antworten mir hier Administratoren von OSM, die dort eine Funktion bekleiden ? Hubert Wend... | |
| 7 | 2023-07-31 08:40 | dieterdreist | ich habe kein persönliches Interesse an diesen Wegen bzw. Nichtwegen. Weiterhin will ich keineswegs Radfahrer in Schutz nehmen die im Wald fahren wo sie es nicht dürfen oder rumschreien und das Wild aufscheuchen. Diese sind aber nur ein Teil der Waldbesucher. Es geht mir darum, Vandalismus... | |
| 133480174 by geozeisig @ 2023-03-09 13:56 | 1 | 2023-07-25 09:19 | dieterdreist | undiscussed mass edit |
| 91340358 by Michele Aquilani @ 2020-09-23 06:40 | 1 | 2020-09-27 16:53 | dieterdreist | in this changeset there are traffic light controlled crossing mistagged as crossings without lights |
| 2 | 2023-07-20 13:21 | dieterdreist | La piazza a montagnola per me non è in parco, è una piazza | |
| 3 | 2023-07-20 13:22 | dieterdreist | sapevi che si può rispondere ai commenti? | |
| 4 | 2023-07-20 19:02 | ivanbranco ♦2,701 | @dieterdreist ha 34 changeset commentati senza risposta, può anche essere che l'email con cui si è iscritto non sia piu' valida e quindi non riceva le notifiche. | |
| 134752062 by Alberto Lionking @ 2023-04-10 23:26 | 1 | 2023-07-19 15:31 | dieterdreist-CAI ♦33 | Buonasera Alberto, ho notato che in questo edit sono stato aggiunti i tags "foot=no" e "bicycle=no" al track way 715736798, mi sembra molto improbabilme perché il percorso fa parte di un sentiero del CAI, mi potresti spiegare la situazione?Grazie,Martin |
| 2 | 2023-07-19 16:13 | Alberto Lionking ♦1 | Buonasera Martin,sono stato in quella zona alcuni mesi fa. Mi ricordo di aver "corretto" il sentiero, ma di non aver modificato alcun tags. Se l'ho fatto è stato per distrazione. Comunque ora ho rivisto il tutto e indicato quei tratti accessibili sia a piedi che in bicicletta... | |
| 3 | 2023-07-19 16:20 | dieterdreist-CAI ♦33 | Buonasera Alberto, sei stato molto veloce, grazie per la risposta e risoluzione del problema,Saluti e buona mappatura,Martin | |
| 4 | 2023-07-19 16:25 | dieterdreist-CAI ♦33 | ho notato che sono rimasto "horse=no" e "motor_vehicle=no", ammetto che non conosco bene la zona, ma al meno per i motor_vehicle suppongo ci siano delle eccezioni (per accedere a foreste e campi con i mezzi agricoli), probabilmente invece di "no" dovrebbe essere "p... | |
| 5 | 2023-07-19 16:37 | Alberto Lionking ♦1 | Quel tratto è ancora molto impervio.Ci sono molti sassi lungo il percorso. Ho lasciato "bicycle=yes" ma pensando solo di farlo in discesa. In salita è improponibile. | |
| 6 | 2023-07-19 17:07 | dieterdreist | ci sarebbero tags per la difficoltà, mtb:scale e mtb:scale:uphill https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scalepuoi anche non mettere bicycle e altri access tag, il default su track per bicycle sarebbe “yes”, in generale la cosa importante che tutti i tags “access&rdqu... | |
| 129654970 by wsoroe @ 2022-12-02 18:58 | 1 | 2023-07-16 20:53 | chris66 ♦367 | Hi. Wieso hast du denn die Adresse von der Bräutigamseiche entfernt? |
| 2 | 2023-07-17 13:07 | wsoroe ♦33 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresseshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/321892508/history#map=16/54.1355/10.5575Vergleiche Version #7 und #8 | |
| 3 | 2023-07-17 14:10 | chris66 ♦367 | Verstehe nicht, was das mit der Adresse zu tun hat. Egal, ist gefixt. | |
| 4 | 2023-07-19 05:38 | Mammi71 ♦253 | Was bitte soll denn an der Adresse nicht OSM kompatibel sein? Ich sehe hier keine Inkompatibilität. Bitte nicht nur auf Wiki-Artikel verweisen, sondern erläutere bitte Dein Problem. Nur weil irgendein Validator was zu Meckern hat, muss man nicht gleich die Adressdaten löschen. Es gilt... | |
| 5 | 2023-07-19 07:28 | dieterdreist | Es gibt keine Adressen die nicht kompatibel sind mit OpenStreetMap, sofern es für ein bestimmtes Format noch keine etablierten tags gibt könnte man sie einführen. Bitte sorgfältiger vorgehen beim Editieren, und nicht blind den QA tools folgen, die bieten nur allgemeine Hinweise, ... | |
| 118528104 by Leonardo Moretti @ 2022-03-15 21:31 | 1 | 2023-07-13 11:51 | dieterdreist | Ciao Leonardo Moretti, ho notato che hai cancellato questa relazione perché era un doppione di https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10351210 Generalmente cerchiamo di mantenere sempre l'oggetto più vecchio (per avere tipicamente lo storico più completo e per "onora... |
| 2 | 2023-07-13 22:04 | Leonardo Moretti ♦3 | Ciao Martin, nel caso specifico la relazione cancellata aveva una sola way membro, mentre quella rimasta ne aveva oltre 30 e mi sembrava in generale più completa e aggiornata.Se però il criterio deve essere preservare l'ID più basso (e quindi la relazione più vec... | |
| 3 | 2023-07-14 08:26 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno Leonardo,grazie per la risposta veloce. Capisco il ragionamento della relazione più dettagliata e lunga, con più versioni ecc.. Il punto con l'id più piccolo è che chi ha creato il doppione (id più alto) ha sbagliato perché avrebbe dovuto... | |
| 59921501 by gnastyle @ 2018-06-17 19:04 | 1 | 2021-02-17 16:05 | dieterdreist | Ciao gnastyle, ho notato che hai messo "access=customers" al parcheggio angolo Via Genocchi/Colombo. In realtà questo non è il parcheggio del secchio e l'olivaro, e si può parcheggiare chi vuole. Di giorno è a pagamento e viene gestito da Ass.ta. A.G.A.Un... |
| 2 | 2023-07-06 15:13 | dieterdreist | Ciao gnastyle, ho solo adesso notato che hai cancellato il civico (ingresso) qui:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2574719169/historyti prego di non farlo, questo è il civico (mentre sul ciclista si tratta di un indirizzo).Grazie,Martin | |
| 137919218 by dieterdreist @ 2023-06-29 13:34 | 1 | 2023-07-04 20:49 | captain_slow ♦66 | Hallo dieterdreist, ich habe dieses Changeset revertiert (mit Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138122469), da es die Geometrie des Zürich Hauptbhanhof unbeabsichtig stark geändert hat. Die Änderung an der Metzgerei Oskar Zeeb habe ich in Changeset https://www.openstre... |
| 2 | 2023-07-04 21:45 | dieterdreist | Hallo und vielen Dank, wollte es aufgrund deiner Nachricht heute Nachmittag gerade selbst machen, war leider nicht früher dazu gekommen.Gruß,Martin | |
| 3 | 2023-07-04 21:48 | dieterdreist | PS: sorry, die Nachricht war von einem anderen user. | |
| 135893903 by dieterdreist @ 2023-05-09 12:30 | 1 | 2023-05-11 20:39 | GBAB ♦101 | Lieber Dieter,es sieht so aus dass zwar die Castle tags gelöscht sind, aber ein note= Tag an vielen Orten geblieben ist.Z.B.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10840537009GrußGábor |
| 2 | 2023-05-11 21:05 | dieterdreist | Das ist mir bewusst, weil es so aussieht als wäre das sinnvolle Information, also refs der Gebäude oder Eingänge, dem muss aber noch nachgegangen werden. Oder hast du anderes beobachtet? | |
| 135469685 by Xyshnyk1990 @ 2023-04-28 13:24 Active block | 1 | 2023-05-03 22:07 | dieterdreist | I don’t know exactly what is happening here but I am going to revert all your changes. Please do not upload invented features. |
| 123929318 by AlCeRoma @ 2022-07-22 09:27 | 1 | 2023-03-27 17:16 | dieterdreist | Ciao AlCeRoma, sei sicuro che nel Forlanini non è più aperto nessuno reparto? 2 anni fa sembrava tutto abbandonato (e lo era per la più grande parte), ma alcuni reparti erano ancora in funzione, ad esempio la medicina nucleare. |
| 2 | 2023-03-28 10:31 | AlCeRoma ♦9 | Il reparto di medicina nucleare, l'ultimo attivo del Forlanini, è stato trasferito nel 2021 (vedi qui: https://www.confinelive.it/nuovo-reparto-di-medicina-nucleare-inaugurato-al-san-camillo-di-roma/).L'opsedale è definitivamente chiuso, credo siano rimasti solo alcuni uffi... | |
| 3 | 2023-03-28 10:36 | dieterdreist | se ci sono alcuni uffici, si potrebbe dire che non è del tutto inutilizzato, no? Rimuovo allora la medicina nucleare (che a dire il tutto, sembrava già abbandonata quando l'ho inserita io, se non ci fossero stati i pazienti e dottori...) | |
| 4 | 2023-03-28 10:44 | AlCeRoma ♦9 | non sono sicuro della presenza di uffici, è solo una mia ipotesi. L'ultima volta che ci sono passato davanti ho visto auto parcheggiate all'interno... | |
| 5 | 2023-03-28 11:37 | dieterdreist | ah ok, potrebbero benissimo essere impiegati o pazienti del San Camillo che parcheggiano lì e vanno là. L'ultima volta che ci sono stato io hanno girato un film. Per ora finchè non troviamo nuove indicazioni va bene così (disused).Saluti,Martin | |
| 131806091 by ChillyDL @ 2023-01-28 12:42 | 1 | 2023-03-26 12:47 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hello,The same questions as always:1) What actual tag changes did you make here (I'm assuming there was no survey involved)2) Where did you discuss this? I only see reference to archaeological sites at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/implementation-of-new-tagging-scheme-of-archaeol... |
| 2 | 2023-03-26 17:56 | ChillyDL ♦100 | Hello SomeoneElse,I suppose you mean your questions as always? This is only the 3rd time we talk about a changeset, and never before did you ask those questions. So for us a first time. The tag changes in these 16 objects were mainly the removal of redundant "site_type=" tags, occasi... | |
| 3 | 2023-03-26 22:43 | dieterdreist | this is not simply "database quality assurance", it is remote tag fiddling supposedly without knowledge about the objects. It looks as if the basis is the removal of "site_type" tags from objects that you do not consider valid archaeolgical sites because they seem not "suffi... | |
| 4 | 2023-03-27 07:53 | ChillyDL ♦100 | I did not decide on their status as archaeological sites. They were not tagged as such, but used the deprecated `site_type=industrial` where other objects in the area use `historic=industrial`. The situation in this case was that in the Yorkshire Dales and North Pennines, a tagging as `historic=indu... | |
| 5 | 2023-03-27 11:31 | dieterdreist | Yes, I apologize, did not want to make a big fuzz, this is very reduced in extent (and not an area I am familiar with admittedly). I would not see "site_type" deprecated if these are not historic=archaeological_site[s] because that proposal was only for archaeological sites. I continue to ... | |
| 6 | 2023-03-27 17:32 | ChillyDL ♦100 | All well, let's do it like this.And yes, true, referring to "site_type=" as deprecated in this context was misleading. It is not. | |
| 89001735 by Frugol @ 2020-08-05 21:05 | 1 | 2020-09-16 09:46 | dieterdreist | Ciao Ludofru,ho visto che hai inserito degli highway=crossing con crossing=marked. Penso sarebbe meglio inserire gli incroci con le strisce (solo strisce) come crossing=zebra e quelle con i semafori crossing=traffic_lights. Che ne pensi?Un saluto,Martin |
| 2 | 2020-09-16 09:47 | dieterdreist | Hi Ludofru,I just noticed you are using an English locale. Question is about crossing=marked. This is a very unspecific tag, I would encourage you to use crossing=zebra and crossing=traffic_lights instead. Thank you.Martin | |
| 3 | 2020-09-16 09:59 | dieterdreist | sorry for the type, of course I meant crossing=traffic_signals | |
| 4 | 2023-03-26 23:19 | dieterdreist | cancellato anche il way originale del circo massimo del 2007, way 11358744 | |
| 81782421 by Frugol @ 2020-03-04 15:40 | 1 | 2021-03-17 19:16 | dieterdreist | Ciao Ludofru, qui sono stato cambiati crossing=traffic_signals in crossing=marked (forse tramite edit automatico di iD). Ti prego di non farlo, perché "marked" può essere qualsiasi cosa (zebra, semaforo, ecc.), mentre "zebra" e "traffic_signals" sono pi&ug... |
| 2 | 2023-03-26 23:17 | dieterdreist | Vedo solo ora che in questo changeset hai cancellato svariati landuse=residential precisi e sostituiti con uno grezzo che contiene qualsiasi landuse, compreso strade, alberghi, parchi, piazze ecc. Un esempio è way 219542092 | |
| 96817624 by Romainmovimento @ 2021-01-02 17:32 | 1 | 2023-02-12 22:32 | dieterdreist | Ciao,ho notato che hai cancellato la pista ciclabile e messo dei tag alla strada: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157689684/historyQuesto significa perdere informazioni, suggerisco di ripristinare la pista con way dedicato (undelete, per non perdere lo storico).Saluti,Martin |
| 2 | 2023-03-24 09:21 | dieterdreist | Mi sembra che la pista risulti ancora cancellata, hai intenzione di ripristinare ciò che hai cancellata, o ti serve aiuto? | |
| 133933897 by Michele Aquilani @ 2023-03-21 10:24 | 1 | 2023-03-23 10:11 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele,ho visto che hai modificato il Bar di Montebello (stazione) da amenity=bar in amenity=cafe, ma non mi sembra ci siano tavoli da sedersi o servizio, ma forse ricordo male?Un saluto,Martin |
| 58897456 by dieterdreist @ 2018-05-12 08:52 | 1 | 2023-03-22 12:42 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,666 | Hello!I know that it is an ancient edit, but maybe you are still mapping in this area...What you mapped as shop=internet in this edit ?Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?Office where you can sign up for internet service?Something related to online shopping (pickup poi... |
| 2 | 2023-03-22 16:26 | dieterdreist | Hi, you cannot sign up for internet service, may "internet cafe" is ok, although it is not a cafe, they have some pcs where you can connect to the internet based on minutely billing (IIRR), and they offer some additional services such as sending and receiving fax and photocopying on a fax ... | |
| 3 | 2023-03-23 09:00 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,666 | > they have some pcs where you can connect to the internet based on minutely billing (IIRR),That is exactly amenity=internet_cafeSee https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dinternet_cafeThough such places nowadays got rare as person without smartphone got rare | |
| 4 | 2023-03-23 09:22 | dieterdreist | There are additional services like printing and cd-burning (which maybe also are old fashioned now) which they used to offer. This one also sold public transport tickets (but not signs that it did), and maybe more, as I wrote, I'm gonna check if it still exists and what their main business is. | |
| 131373476 by unni-geo @ 2023-01-17 11:03 | 1 | 2023-03-21 17:57 | dieterdreist | Hi, du hast den ERP auf circular umgetaggt allerdings ist die Vorfahrtsregelung wie ein Kreisverkehr (abgesehen davon dass es Ampeln gibt). So eindeutig ist es nicht, dass junction=roundabout ein Kreisverkehrszeichen erfordert, wenn es eins gibt ist es sicher zwingend, aber wenn es keins gibt kö... |
| 87221929 by Antanicus @ 2020-06-27 09:39 | 1 | 2023-03-19 21:11 | dieterdreist | Ciao, ho notato che uno dei fix era la rimozione dell’indirizzo del punto ristoro. Ti chiedo gentilmente di stare attento non tutte le segnalazioni degli editori sono errori, grazie buona mappatura,Martin |
| 109217398 by Dino Michelini @ 2021-08-05 18:48 | 1 | 2023-03-15 08:33 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno Dino,guardando Monte Santa Caterina mi chiedo da dove viene l'altezza, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5976615274/historyconfrontando con le curve di livello (e anche stando alla riva opposta del lago) non sembra sia così alto. Ti riccordi dove l'hai presa ("... |
| 2 | 2023-03-15 13:46 | Dino Michelini ♦321 | Si hai ragione è un errore tra 0 e 9. Il dato dell’elevazione è un rilievo di quanto facevo le pattuglie topografiche come allievo ufficiale a Cesano. Grazie | |
| 3 | 2023-03-15 13:52 | dieterdreist | Grazie della risposta, ho corretto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133711183(spero di aver capito bene).saluti,Martin | |
| 4 | 2023-03-15 14:01 | Dino Michelini ♦321 | Perfetto. Grazie | |
| 99468006 by Dino Michelini @ 2021-02-17 17:14 | 1 | 2023-03-14 13:22 | dieterdreist | Ciao,ho notato che hai rimosso landcover=trees e sostituito landuse=forest con natural=wood. Non mi interessa la seconda modifica, perché si tratta effettivamente di sinonimi, ma perché hai rimosso il tag "landcover"? Saluti,Martin |
| 2 | 2023-03-15 13:44 | Dino Michelini ♦321 | Ciao, provo a rispondere... Wood e forest non sono proprio sinonimi: wood sono i boschi naturali (per capirci ad es. la faggeta di Oriolo dove non si praticano tagli) forest sono i boschi cedui dove con turnazione di tot anni si procede al taglio.Secondo me landcover è un tag sinonimo che n... | |
| 68852218 by nmotupal @ 2019-04-03 18:21 | 1 | 2023-03-10 13:48 | dieterdreist | Hi, I noticed you added this way with access=private: way 681450489Can you confirm this is from survey, or were you just guessing? It doesn't look as if all of it is just a driveway.Cheers,Martin |
| 2 | 2023-03-13 08:09 | sanganh ♦6 | Hi Martin,Thank you for reviewing our changeset and flagging out the issue.It's an honest mistake from our end. I have made the necessary changes in the changeset.Always happy to learn from the community.Thanks once again,looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,sanganh | |
| 3 | 2023-03-13 18:43 | dieterdreist | Hi sanganh,thank you for replying, my suggestion would be to tag only those ways with access tags where you have checked it on the ground, and otherwise you just map the driveway without adding acccess tags. | |
| 4 | 2023-03-13 18:44 | dieterdreist | forgot, thank you for fixing the issue. Have a nice day,Cheers,Martin | |
| 17138515 by tomtom97 @ 2013-07-29 12:15 | 1 | 2015-04-04 13:27 | luschi ♦417 | perché hai messo access=permissive sulla SS48? |
| 2 | 2023-02-27 13:12 | dieterdreist | Hello, I noticed you added foot=no to the SS48 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175581384/history This is a legal access restriction, and it also extents to implicit sidewalks in villages etc., so it is usually wrong unless it is explicitly signposted or a motorway. There are hiking relations on ... | |
| 3 | 2023-02-27 17:24 | luschi ♦417 | Hi, I have checked(Mapillary) the SS48 from `Hotel Lupo Bianco` up to the `Passo Pordoi` and there is no traffic sing that define any access. nothing found about food and nothing about horse | |
| 4 | 2023-03-03 13:16 | dieterdreist | Hi Luschi, thank you for checking and sorry for replying late. It seems the access restriction should be removed, and I have partially done so where the hiking route runs, but there are more (results of way splits) where I am not sure and just added a fixme for the moment. If you are sure they shoul... | |
| 5 | 2023-11-30 12:06 | Anonix35 ♦60 | Hi,I removed the restrictive tags regarding pedestrians and horses. In fact, no sign indicates this.I also updated the speeds on the SS242 and 48Andrea | |
| 112535093 by dieterdreist @ 2021-10-15 09:41 | 1 | 2023-03-02 15:36 | Tjuro_QA ♦43 | Hello dieterdreist,I seems that you have added an man_made=flowerbed:https://www.osm.org/way/993018375 I recently started documenting and using landcover=flowerbed as an alternative to the controversial landuse=flowerbed. https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=flowerbed Would ... |
| 2 | 2023-03-02 19:18 | dieterdreist | actually I do mind, there is already a different landcover, while it is physically a flowerbed construction, there is currently only grass in it, your proposal would lead to information loss in this case. Generally I would see flower beds as part of the countable items, hence I would prefer somethin... | |
| 3 | 2023-03-03 08:08 | ManualTagFixer ♦42 | A, I see what you mean now, it is just a bit of a hard problem.So, if I understand you correctly, you can have man_made=flowerbed + landcover=grass/dirt/ect, to indicate the landcover most of the year. And then use the man_made=flowerbed that it has been seeded with flowers?Greetings,Tjuro | |
| 4 | 2023-03-03 08:35 | dieterdreist | I think this particular one isn’t seeded since many years, in general I think we should distinguish between the structure (flowerbed as a countable feature) and eventually what is growing there, and we should use different values and not just different keys (to avoid confusion) | |
| 39335875 by IIVQ @ 2016-05-15 17:45 | 1 | 2023-02-22 10:58 | dieterdreist | Hi, I noticed you have created ways with access=private, for example here: way 418338778This tag means that the way is not generally accessible. But these ways (some of them) are part of hiking relations, so the tag seems likely to be in error, do you remember why you set it?Cheers,Martin |
| 2 | 2023-02-23 15:22 | IIVQ ♦136 | Hi.This is strange, I can not remember why I made this edit. In fact, I can not remember ever having been in this area, so I don't know why I changed or even created these ways.I would be ok with you removing the access=private. | |
| 3 | 2023-02-24 11:06 | dieterdreist | it is strange, because the from the history of the nodes it is clear that you not only created the way (as it would be possible e.g. by splitting an existing way), but you actually drew this way and added the access-tags, likely you did so after a ground survey.Cheers,Martin | |
| 35613943 by Gavaasuren @ 2015-11-27 15:56 | 1 | 2023-02-22 18:22 | dieterdreist | Hi, habe gerade durch Zufall diese Relation entdeckt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5699948das ist die Art von Multipolygon die m.E. die Karte unnötig kompliziert macht. Das ist keine zusammengehörige Fläche sondern einfach alle Fußgängerflächen in der Gegen... |
| 91509746 by redrace @ 2020-09-25 12:27 | 1 | 2023-02-20 17:27 | dieterdreist | Hi, du hast den Weg way 851516211 auf razed:highway=track gesetzt, aber laut Strava ist der Weg in Benutzung, außerdem führt eine CAI-Wanderroute darüber. Evtl. ist das jetzt ein path? Gruß,Martin |
| 2 | 2023-02-20 18:02 | redrace ♦158 | Das ist zwei Jahre her. Als ich da war, war da kein Weg sichtbar! Ein Jahr vorher war da ein schwerer Sturm, und so sah es da dann auch aus. Infornationen von Anwohnern besagten, das der Weg wahrscheinlich nicht wieder aufgemacht wird. Naturschutz! Wenn da wieder ein Weg ist dann kannst Du das ä... | |
| 3 | 2023-02-21 09:09 | dieterdreist | danke für die Antwort, ich habe in Strava gesehen dass der Weg genutzt wird und ich habe vom SAT die Daten der Route die da drüber führt, aber ich war nicht vor Ort und lasse es erstmal so, werde aber den SAT benachrichtigen und sie fragen ob sie aktuelle Vor-Ort-Kenntnisse haben, es ... | |
| 4 | 2023-02-21 09:47 | redrace ♦158 | Ich habe mir mal die Bingbilder von 2022 angeschaut, und da sieht es so aus als würde da wieder ein Weg sein. | |
| 5 | 2023-02-22 17:36 | dieterdreist | ja, habe ich auch gesehen, allerdings bin ich mir nicht ganz sicher ob track oder path. Wenn Du einverstanden bist würde ich die Beweislage vom Schreibtisch aus hier ausreichend bewerten (Luftbild und Strava heatmap und Nähe zu Bebauung) um davon auszugehen, dass die Wege mittlerweile wied... | |
| 6 | 2023-02-22 17:48 | redrace ♦158 | HuhuMach das. Ich komme da nie nächste Zeit sowieso nicht mehr hin.😁Gruß Meik | |
| 7 | 2023-02-22 18:12 | dieterdreist | fertig, danke nochmal für das fruchtbare Gespräch. | |
| 8 | 2023-02-22 18:26 | redrace ♦158 | Sehr gerne! 😁 | |
| 49045067 by simone_girardelli @ 2017-05-28 12:52 | 1 | 2023-02-22 10:56 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno Simone,Ho notato che la way 496454161 contiene il tag access=private, ciò significa che non è accessibile. Come può far parte di una relazione di sentiero?Ciao,Martin |
| 2 | 2023-02-23 17:17 | simone_girardelli ♦29 | Ciao Martin, in teoria si tratta di tratto di strada forestale per uso boschivo e richiede in questo caso permesso, quindi accessibile a piedi.Però non ho sottomano lo shapefile delle strade forestali, ammesso e concesso sia aggiornato.devo vedere appena ho tempo. | |
| 122328598 by Dario Toso @ 2022-06-13 14:36 | 1 | 2023-02-16 12:02 | dieterdreist | anche qui lo stesso problema di allineamento |
| 122419633 by Dario Toso @ 2022-06-15 13:37 | 1 | 2023-02-16 09:36 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno Dario Toso,ti segnalo che qui hai allineato le geometrie ad una ortofoto disallineata creando così uno scostamento. Bisogna sempre tenere in mente che le ortofoto possono essere disallineati (e lo sono spesso), quindi non fidarsi delle ortofoto. Sono le tracce gpx che non hanno d... |
| 122320726 by Dario Toso @ 2022-06-13 11:20 | 1 | 2023-02-13 11:57 | dieterdreist | Ciao Dario,ho notato che hai spostato delle geometrie secondo una foto aereahttps://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=122320726purtroppo quella foto non era posizionata bene. Ti chiedo di non fidarti delle ortofoto quando ci sono gli offset, bisogno guardare più foto e soprattutto le ... |
| 123360543 by ascanio12 @ 2022-07-08 12:19 | 1 | 2023-02-12 18:49 | dieterdreist | Buonasera Ascanio12,mi sono guardato queste modifiche e ti vorrei dire che le tracce gpx spesso non sono molto precisi e non si possono implementare 1:1 così come sono. In particolare nel punto visibile qui https://ibb.co/dQXw33f hai introdotto tanti nodi che non sembrano reali (la tua mo... |
| 131555036 by Interteutones @ 2023-01-21 22:02 | 1 | 2023-01-22 16:42 | Langlaeufer ♦1,315 | Hallo Interteutones,das die Gleise irgendwann abgebaut wurden ist noch kein Grund die korrekt erfassten ehemaligen Bahnstrecken zu löschen., solange sie noch im Gelände erkennbar sind.Grüße Langlaeufer --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Publishe... |
| 2 | 2023-01-22 16:59 | Interteutones ♦43 | Hallo,ich bin da persönlich absolut deiner Meinung. Habe mir deshalb aber schon eine einwöchige Sperre eingehandelt. Laut dem Herrn Frederik Ramm von OSM sollen die ehemaligen Bahnlinien entfernt werden. Es wurden in der Vergangenheit zu viele Bahnstrecken in die Karten aufgenommen, wo... | |
| 3 | 2023-01-23 07:16 | dieterdreist | Hat Frederik dich mit der Löschung beauftragt? Anderenfalls ist er kein Ansprechpartner für Dinge die du gelöscht hast.Gruß Martin | |
| 4 | 2023-01-23 07:41 | Langlaeufer ♦1,315 | Wenn du nicht der Meinung bist, das dies gelöscht werden soll, dann verstehe ich ehrlich gesagt nicht, wieso du hier aktiv wurdest und die Arbeit eines anderen Mappers zerstörst. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/cha... | |
| 5 | 2023-01-23 10:53 | Interteutones ♦43 | Ich hatte dir die Antwort auf deine Frage gestern schon geschrieben. Bitte durchlesen. Es kommt hier nicht auf meine Meinung an. MfG | |
| 6 | 2023-01-23 11:06 | Interteutones ♦43 | Ja, es war Herr Frederik Ramm. Ob er Ansprechpartner ist oder nicht weis ich nicht. Meines Erachtens ist er so etwas wie ein Ombudsmann.Jedenfalls hatte ich mit Herr Ramm diesbezüglich mehrmals Kontakt. Es ist überdies auch in der, Lage den Zugang hier zu sperren, was in meinem Fall wege... | |
| 7 | 2023-01-23 12:10 | Langlaeufer ♦1,315 | Niemand kann dich zwingen Daten zu verändern, die andere Nutzer eingetragen haben. Du bist nur für deine Bearbeitungen verantwortlich und wirst ggf. gebeten diese zu korrigieren. | |
| 8 | 2023-01-23 13:03 | Langlaeufer ♦1,315 | Ich möchte dich bitten solche Rachelöschungen künftig zu unterlassen. | |
| 9 | 2023-01-23 13:27 | Interteutones ♦43 | Bitte unterstelle mir nicht solchen Nonsens. Ich habe nun schon wiederholt geschrieben, dass ich selbst abgebaute Bahnen eingetragen habe und hierfür eine Sperre erhielt. Ich hatte auch schon wiederholt darum gebeten bei Rückfragen Herrn Ramm zu konsultieren. Ich lege die Regeln in OSM nic... | |
| 10 | 2023-01-23 13:58 | Langlaeufer ♦1,315 | Wie auch dieterdreist dir schon nahe gelegt hat, hat dein Konflikt mit Herrn Ramm mit diesen Änderungen hier nichts zu tun. Diese Daten hast nicht du eingetragen. Zudem sind die Bahnanlagen vor Ort auch noch erkennbar. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published u... | |
| 11 | 2023-01-23 14:30 | Interteutones ♦43 | Ich habe mit Herr Ramm keinen Konflikt oder ähnliches. Ich habe nur versucht dir sachlich die Hintergründe dazulegen. Und nochmal: Wenn du zum Thema Fragen hast, wende dich bitte an Herr Ramm. Deine andauernden Unterstellungen hier sind nicht hilfreich. | |
| 12 | 2023-01-23 15:47 | Langlaeufer ♦1,315 | Dann kann es sich ja nur um ein Missverständnis handeln. Nimm doch bitte mal ein Blick die Doku. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway%3Dabandoned. Es gilt das On the Ground Prinzip. Was vor Ort erkennbar ist darf in die Karte.Evtl. Unklarheiten lassen sich im Forum klären.... | |
| 13 | 2023-01-23 21:33 | Interteutones ♦43 | Sorry, aber wie oft soll ich es denn noch schreiben !Ich selbst habe eine abgebaute Bahnlinie eingezeichnet, bin dann wohl deswegen bei OSM von einem OSM-Kollegen gemeldet worden (Name wurde mir nicht genannt) und erhielt vom Hr. Fizzie41 eine einwöchige Sperrung. Auf meinen Protest hin hat H... | |
| 14 | 2023-01-24 09:24 | dieterdreist | Es geht hier nicht um Bahnlinien die du eingezeichnet hast sondern um solche die du gelöscht hast und die jemand anderes eingezeichnet hatte, und von denen noch Spuren erkennbar sind. Diese Bahnlinien sind bereits wieder hergestellt, es gibt hierzu also keinen konkreten Handlungsbedarf. Was ich... | |
| 15 | 2023-01-24 11:33 | Interteutones ♦43 | Guten Tag dieterdreist.Danke für deinen Kommentar. Nachdem ich hier nun mitbekommen habe, was durch die Löschung einer nicht mehr existierenden Eisenbahnlinie ein Schriftverkehr bzw. Aufwand entstanden ist, bin ich wirklich am überlegen, ob ich künftig überhaupt noch was i... | |
| 129838666 by b-unicycling @ 2022-12-07 22:59 | 1 | 2023-01-17 16:17 | dieterdreist | Hi, this is clearly a mechanical edit, can you explain why you removed the site_type tag? Adding a new tag is one thing (although to do it in a mechanical edit it must follow the guidelines), but removing a tag is a completely different thing. How will this continue? A month has passed an nothing ha... |
| 2 | 2023-01-18 00:00 | b-unicycling ♦242 | site_type is a deprecated key for archaeological sites: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:site_typeThat's all I have to say. | |
| 3 | 2023-01-18 07:07 | dieterdreist | That’s clearly not sufficient to remove thousands of it on a global scale… | |
| 102361734 by berjk @ 2021-04-06 01:16 | 1 | 2023-01-12 09:37 | dieterdreist | Hallo Berjk, ich habe bemerkt dass Du hier den Albstadt-node umgetaggt hast von "municipality" zu "town". Das ist das tagging für eine "echte" Stadt im Siedlungssinn. Bei Albstadt, wie Dir zweifellos bekannt sein dürfte, handelt es sich nicht um eine Siedlung ... |
| 100496177 by judisa @ 2021-03-05 13:51 | 1 | 2023-01-08 23:56 | dieterdreist | Hi, ich habe bemerkt, dass Du die Fußgänger-Verbindung zwischen Konzenbergstr. und Weiherhaldenstr. als "private" eingetragen hast. Ich bin dort auch vor kurzem gegangen und hatte nicht den Eindruck, dass es sich um einen Privatweg handelt, und insbesondere nicht, dass der Durch... |
| 13142207 by bema @ 2012-09-17 11:31 | 1 | 2022-12-28 13:15 | dieterdreist | Hallo, habe bemerkt dass Du den way 181440206 mit access=no eingetragen hast, aber der Weg ist Teil einer offiziellen Wanderroute. Erinnerst Du Dich evtl. noch? Ist zugegebenermaßen schon ganz schön lang her...Gruß,Martin |
| 81625286 by Leopy_Periz @ 2020-02-29 17:18 | 1 | 2022-12-16 18:10 | dieterdreist | Buonasera Leopy Periz,ho notato il tuo commento "riaperto sentiero ripulito da alberi caduti", ma non hai rimosso il tag obstacle=fallen_tree, suppongo una svista? Anche il tag "abandoned:highway=path" dovrebbe essere highway=path a questo punto. Ti segnalo che ho applicato que... |
| 2 | 2022-12-27 20:02 | Leopy_Periz ♦2 | Si, hai ragione. Grazie. | |
| 3 | 2022-12-27 23:53 | dieterdreist | Grazie a te per la risposta! | |
| 130077995 by Nationales Naturmonument Weltenburger Enge @ 2022-12-14 14:17 | 1 | 2022-12-26 10:48 | dieterdreist | Anscheinend gibt es das NSG schon in OpenStreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14909063In diesem Fall bitte ggf. das bestehende Objekt anpassen aber kein Duplikat erzeugen. Oder gibt es dort zwei Schutzgebiete auf derselben Fläche? |
| 2 | 2022-12-26 11:27 | SpaLeo ♦36 | Es gibt dort tatsächlich zwei (fast) Deckungsgleiche Gebiete. Das NSG und ein FFH-Gebiet mit dem gleichen Namen. Bei dem neu eingetragenen NSG wurde unter WDPA_ID:ref die Natura 2000 ID des FFH-Gebiets eingetragen, die gar nicht unter WDPA eingetragen gehört, da die ID der Natura 2000 Gebi... | |
| 3 | 2022-12-28 12:41 | Nationales Naturmonument Weltenburger Enge ♦1 | Der aktuelle Stand ist der, dass hier eine Zusammenlegung vorheriger Naturschutzgebiete bzw. eines nationalen Naturmonuments stattgefunden hat. Die Untergliederung dieses Naturschutzgebiets ist etwas schwierig und hier mal grob zusammengefasst: Der ganze Bereich ist nun das NSG Weltenburger Enge, Hi... | |
| 122763990 by Fred73000 @ 2022-06-23 14:59 | 1 | 2022-06-27 09:18 | Claudio Tam ♦20 | Ciao Fred73000!Con type=boundary e type=multipolygon facevo riferimento ai 116 membri della relazione e non alla relazione. Per la relazione, type=collection mi sembra perfetto.Ho inserito una proposta di tagging di tutti i 116 membri della relazione qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk... |
| 2 | 2022-06-28 18:17 | Fred73000 ♦223 | I think it is great to use tags that everybody uses (tags you can find in the wiki).In my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122764434I put for all type=boundary + boundary=place according to the wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3DplaceI don't ... | |
| 3 | 2022-06-28 18:49 | ivanbranco ♦2,701 | I post here since a conversation already started: I don't think this relation has much sense: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14281406/historyRelations are not categories: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categoriesOtherwise we could create relations such &qu... | |
| 4 | 2022-06-28 18:51 | ivanbranco ♦2,701 | If someone needs this data they can just do a query for boundaries inside the admin_level=8 Rome boundary. | |
| 5 | 2022-06-29 09:01 | Claudio Tam ♦20 | ivanbranco that's not correct; there are a lot of non-adm "places", with a lot of different types. "distretti toponomastici" is a very specific and well defined non-adm type. There are other non-adm types such as "Zone O", "PDZ", "Aree urbane", ... | |
| 6 | 2022-07-02 19:52 | Fred73000 ♦223 | according to taginfo, there is a lot of different "places" https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/place#values = currently 867 values.For me there is no problem to tag :* type=boundary* boundary = place* place = zone O or PDZ or Aree urbane or what you want (but, if possible, use... | |
| 7 | 2022-12-12 18:27 | dieterdreist | there are different place values, yes, but there are also different toponomastic divisions, you seem to have collected some of them in a relation. I agree with Ivan, these relations are heavy on data consumers and are just a collection of what can be mapped with tags, hence should be removed. Do not... | |
| 129937301 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-12-10 15:32 | 1 | 2022-12-12 05:11 | user_5359 ♦19,415 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/7031274. What is the meaning of the tag [=00:15? |
| 2 | 2022-12-12 10:23 | dieterdreist | Hi, thank you for spotting this, I fixed it.Have a nice day! | |
| 66388939 by Andrea from Rome @ 2019-01-17 09:23 | 1 | 2022-12-11 22:28 | dieterdreist | Ciao Andrea,ho notato che hai messo "foot=no" alla via del Mare, ma non mi sembra ci sia un tale divieto presente (non dico sia raccomandabile utilizzare la strada, penso sia probabilmente una mancanza da parte dei risponsabili) e quindi non va messo. O forse mi sfugge un divieto?S... |
| 103467118 by Michele Aquilani @ 2021-04-23 09:00 | 1 | 2022-12-10 00:46 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele, ho notato che hai spostato tutto una serie di punti di interesse a Piazza dei Navigatori dall'interno dell'edificio verso il bordo, penso sia peggio di prima, anche perché vorrei prima o poi aggiungere gli ingressi con i civici, e si sovraporrerebbe |
| 39639342 by Dino Michelini @ 2016-05-29 10:25 | 1 | 2022-12-02 23:45 | dieterdreist | Ciao Dino,ho notato che hai cambiato questa strada da service a track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60096293 ma non può essere un track perché porta ad un parcheggio un paese fantasma. I track portano solo a campi e boschi. Buona mappatura,Martin |
| 50910622 by simone_girardelli @ 2017-08-07 09:13 | 1 | 2022-11-18 11:27 | dieterdreist | buongiorno Simone,ti scrivo in merito al tag "website" (rendendomi conto che questo inserimento è stato fatto 5 anni fa, e forse non si usa più lo stesso template). Con il tag "website" si può indicare una pagina specifica sull'oggetto. Ti prego di n... |
| 2 | 2022-11-23 10:26 | simone_girardelli ♦29 | Ciao Martin, scusa il ritardo, ho provato a cercare nelle varie mailing lists se ne avevo parlato, ma non riesco a trovare nulla, forse per limite mio, comunque il link contenuto nel tag, è vero fa riferimento al sito ufficiale, però tieni presente che la traccia da lì si pu&ogr... | |
| 3 | 2022-11-25 13:08 | dieterdreist | Ciao Simone,chiedo anch'io scusa della risposta ritardata. Hai ragione che nel wiki c'è il riferimento di inserire questa pagina web. Secondome, sarebbe da modificare o togliere, ma ne vorrei sentire altri pareri (scriverò a breve in Mailing list talk-it). Visto che si trov... | |
| 102406406 by alessandrocarmeli @ 2021-04-06 12:06 | 1 | 2022-11-23 00:50 | dieterdreist | Ciao Alessandro,ho visto che hai aggiunto questo way: 926710380 ma credo che non serviva perché si sovrappone al landuse già mappato in maniera più dettagliata. Forse volevi mettere i tag "place"?saluti,Martin |
| 125479853 by Baron d'Arignac @ 2022-08-28 14:17 | 1 | 2022-11-21 14:18 | dieterdreist | Hi Baron,I have noticed that you removed a note:it tag from way 294972628 but I found that the data from SAT is still not in accordance with the OSM way, and you do not explain it in your changeset comment. Have you been there, and are there guideposts/markers for the 245A route along this way? ... |
| 2 | 2022-11-21 16:39 | dieterdreist | Hi Baron, it is me again, I somehow missed the end of your fixme, not it is clear and I will modify the relation accordingly, thank you. | |
| 113245158 by TWHB @ 2021-11-01 16:29 | 1 | 2022-11-18 17:12 | dieterdreist | Hey, a lot of lost history in this changeset. Did you really have to delete and redraw the situation in front of Santa Croce in Gerusalemme? The current state is broken by the way, with your redesigned representation no routing is possible any more. |
| 113167109 by ASD Sabina Trekking @ 2021-10-30 16:22 | 1 | 2022-11-13 01:27 | dieterdreist | Salve,ancora io, qui hai cancellato un anno fa due way con attributi ricchi: access \tpermissivehighway \tservicesource \tsurveysurface \tcobblestonee ancora oggi si trova un buco con un fantasmatico area:highway che non e mai stato proposto in alternativa ma solo in aggiunta agli highwa... |
| 2 | 2022-11-13 22:19 | ASD Sabina Trekking ♦1 | In origine tutto il tratto tra l'ingresso dell'ex Mattatoio e le Mura Aureliane era definito come Largo Dino Frisullo. Ho cercato di correggere il disegno della zona definendo bene i confini tra I e VIII Municipio, ho inserito la denominazione di Via della Pelanda, ho inserito la denominaz... | |
| 3 | 2022-11-14 09:45 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno, grazie delle risposta, ho provveduto e riparato la connettività facendo undelete sugli highway. Ti prego di stare attento cosa carichi come modifica, quando qualcosa va storta la cosa migliore è non caricare le modifiche.Saluti,Martin | |
| 127949016 by ASD Sabina Trekking @ 2022-10-23 09:36 | 1 | 2022-11-13 01:18 | dieterdreist | meglio così non è un commento sufficente per cancellare qualcosa che esiste. Questo non avevi ridisegnato. |
| 127948972 by ASD Sabina Trekking @ 2022-10-23 09:34 | 1 | 2022-11-13 01:14 | dieterdreist | Salve, questo è una curiosità, hai creato un railway=crossing tra un ponte e la ferrovia sotto? |
| 127948842 by ASD Sabina Trekking @ 2022-10-23 09:31 | 1 | 2022-11-13 01:11 | dieterdreist | Ciao ASD Sabina Trekking,ho notato che hai cancellato il ponte e poi ridisegnato con access-tags sbagliati. Se si cancella e ridisegna si perde tutto lo storico del way (non è più accessibile facilmente). In generale, "access=permit" significa che si vuole un permesso ma ot... |
| 104441543 by Città di Palmi @ 2021-05-10 10:09 | 1 | 2022-11-05 01:26 | dieterdreist | Non mi sembra un'area residenziale, conosco il posto in parte, la scula tedesca non è residenziale, la strada non è residenziale, la biblioteca non è residenziale, l'albergo non è residenziale, direi che quasi tutta l'area non è residenziale, non esc... |
| 77761688 by mfbehrens @ 2019-11-30 16:19 | 1 | 2022-10-28 11:33 | dieterdreist | Hallo Michael, ich habe gesehen, dass Du "network" der TMR von rwn auf nwn gesetzt hast (allerdings noch am selben Tag), und wollte nachfragen, ob rwn nicht passender wäre, eine "regionale" Route? Alternativ "iwn" weil Landesgrenzen überschritten werden, wobei... |
| 2 | 2022-10-28 12:39 | mfbehrens ♦19 | Hi Martin,tatsächlich sind das die Probleme von diesem Tag. Du kannst es gerne wieder in rwn ändern.Gruß Michael | |
| 3 | 2022-10-28 13:03 | dieterdreist-CAI ♦33 | so bold will ich da momentan nicht sein, und das alleine entscheiden, vielleicht hängen “die Schweizer” ja an diesem tag hatte ich mir gedacht, oder der CAI in Italien, aber wenn du auch zu rwn tendierst (habe ich das richtig verstanden?) wäre das ja schonmal ein Datenpunkt. Da... | |
| 42090192 by mcheckimport @ 2016-09-12 01:38 | 1 | 2022-10-26 12:29 | dieterdreist | Ciao Mcheck,ho notato che in questo changeset hai inserito per esempio landuse=residential in maniera molto strana (e credo sbagliata), su tutto un villaggio a prescindere del uso del suolo, e comprendendo strade in maniera apposita (le strade non sono mai landuse=residential), ad esempio qui: way... |
| 127672339 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-17 13:06 | 1 | 2022-10-23 15:33 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. Parte del sentiero 6 era già stata inserita nella relazione 2780436. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-25 09:46 | dieterdreist | Ciao, giusto, ho ora unificato le due relazioni e tolto il duplicato, grazie! | |
| 126930632 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-03 11:02 | 1 | 2022-10-23 15:26 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. Il sentiero 12 era già presente nella relazione 14649773. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-25 09:39 | dieterdreist | hai ragione, hanno dati formalmente diversi (from, to), ma una era interamente contenuta nell'altra e con cai_scale uguale non ha senso avere un duplicato. Ho rimosso la relazione contenuta. Grazie, Martin | |
| 125901615 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-09-07 13:06 | 1 | 2022-10-23 15:16 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero 9A è errato. Il name è errato perché non deve contenere le località di arrivo e partenza (per quello ci sono i tag from e to). Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:55 | dieterdreist | giusto, risolto i problemi, grazie, Martin | |
| 127844024 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-20 15:07 | 1 | 2022-10-23 15:14 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero "6 -9" è errato. Ciao, Andrea PS Ma il ref è corretto? |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:52 | dieterdreist | Questo è da indagare e risolvere, i ref composti anche a me sembrano strani. Per questo il simbolo è un placeholder che indica un eventuale problema. È un caso che sto monitorando. Grazie, Martin | |
| 3 | 2022-10-24 15:38 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Non sarebbe meglio mettere un fixme? Ciao, Andrea | |
| 126740108 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-09-28 12:59 | 1 | 2022-10-23 15:13 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero 23 è errato. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:52 | dieterdreist | grazie, risolto. Ciao, Martin | |
| 127886758 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-21 14:12 | 1 | 2022-10-23 15:13 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero "13 - 4" è errato. Ciao, Andrea PS Ma il ref è corretto? |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:50 | dieterdreist | Questo è da indagare e risolvere, i ref composti anche a me sembrano strani. Per questo il simbolo è un placeholder che indica un eventuale problema. È un caso che sto monitorando. Grazie, Martin | |
| 127887631 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-21 14:22 | 1 | 2022-10-23 15:12 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero "15 - 4G - 6A" è errato. Ciao, Andrea PS Ma il ref è corretto? |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:49 | dieterdreist | Questo è da indagare e risolvere, i ref composti anche a me sembrano strani. Per questo il simbolo è un placeholder che indica un eventuale problema. È un caso che sto monitorando. Grazie, Martin | |
| 127885265 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-21 13:49 | 1 | 2022-10-23 15:11 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero "2- 5" è errato. Ciao, Andrea PS Ma il ref è corretto? |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:48 | dieterdreist | Questo è da indagare e risolvere, i ref composti anche a me sembrano strani. Per questo il simbolo è un placeholder che indica un eventuale problema. È un caso che sto monitorando. Grazie, Martin | |
| 126688080 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-09-27 09:01 | 1 | 2022-10-23 15:10 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero 4G è errato. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:47 | dieterdreist | grazie, ho risolto. Ciao, Martin | |
| 126516648 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-09-22 18:08 | 1 | 2022-10-23 15:10 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero 11 è errato. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:45 | dieterdreist | grazie, risolto. Ciao, Martin | |
| 127675637 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-17 14:13 | 1 | 2022-10-23 15:10 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero 4 è errato. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:44 | dieterdreist | grazie, ho risolto. Ciao, Martin | |
| 127892853 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-21 16:19 | 1 | 2022-10-23 15:07 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero 4A è errato. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:42 | dieterdreist | grazie, risolto. Saluti, Martin | |
| 126979905 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-04 08:20 | 1 | 2022-10-23 14:58 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. Il sentiero 18 è senza cai_scale. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:39 | dieterdreist | vedi l'altra risposta, non ho il dato, se mi puoi procurare il cai_scale, metti lo :)grazie,Martin | |
| 126943947 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-03 15:25 | 1 | 2022-10-23 14:55 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. La relazione 12368042 sembra un duplicato della 3157450. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:36 | dieterdreist | è vero, per il momento non ho guardato ancora ne una ne l'altra (non fanno parte del lwn), ma ci starò attento a risolvere fra poco quando guardo le rwn. Grazie, Martin | |
| 126380250 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-09-19 15:08 | 1 | 2022-10-23 14:51 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. Il sentiero 25A è senza cai_scale. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:30 | dieterdreist | è vero, ma in questo caso l'informazione non era disponibile. Conosci tu il cai_scale giusto? Sarebbe utile metterlo. Saluti, Martin | |
| 126939478 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-03 13:43 | 1 | 2022-10-23 14:42 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. Il sentiero 9 era già stato parzialmente inserito nella relazione 6491115. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:26 | dieterdreist | grazie, ho unificato i due percorsi e tolto il duplicato. Ciao, Martin | |
| 126938351 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-03 13:16 | 1 | 2022-10-22 09:59 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero 35 è sbagliato. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-23 14:40 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. Il sentiero 4 era già presente nella relazione 9927937. Ciao, Andrea | |
| 3 | 2022-10-24 13:18 | dieterdreist | il sentiero 35 non l'ho modificato o controllato, suppongo la versione nuova è dovuto al split di un membro. In ogni caso ho riparato il simbolo. Invece per il sentiero 4 vale la stessa cosa scritto in precendenza (operator su relazione parziale impedisce il merge per il momento, da ri... | |
| 4 | 2022-10-24 16:12 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Non ho capito il discorso sul sentiero 4. Non è tutto all'interno del comune di Valtournenche? Ciao, Andrea | |
| 5 | 2022-10-24 17:43 | dieterdreist-CAI ♦33 | non so se gestiscono tutto il sentiero. Suggerisci che presumo di sì, se non va oltre i confini communali? Ciao, Martin | |
| 126755447 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-09-28 20:46 | 1 | 2022-10-23 14:36 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. C'è qualcosa di sbagliato nel sentiero 10A. Dal tagging, dovrebbe terminare al Passage du Grand Neyron, invece termina a Levionaz, come la relazione 12794047. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 13:00 | dieterdreist | non è così, la 14602150 inizia a Levionaz ed è come descritto, invece il problema che vedo è la 12794047 (che va nell'altro verso) ha un cai_scale di EE mentre la versione più piccola e completamente contenuta ha cai_scale=EEA. Va indagato e risolto.grazie... | |
| 126186251 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-09-14 14:53 | 1 | 2022-10-23 13:56 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. Il sentiero 1 era già presente nella relazione 2235474. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 12:50 | dieterdreist | hai ragione, ho unificato i due sentieri e le loro informazioni, grazie! | |
| 127876972 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-21 11:04 | 1 | 2022-10-23 13:54 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. Il sentiero 13D era già presente nella relazione 6580908 (però fino al Pointe de la Traversière). Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 12:40 | dieterdreist | sì, questo ricade nei casi da risolvere, non potevo fare il merge per via del cai_scale sconosciuto della versione più lunga. Per sicurezza non ho messo il cai_scale su questa parte. Sarà comunque risolto a breve. Grazie per la segnalazione, Martin | |
| 126456392 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-09-21 09:50 | 1 | 2022-10-23 13:46 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. Il sentiero 11C era già parzialmente presente nella relazione 6584086. Ciao, Amdrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 12:24 | dieterdreist | sì, questo è un caso particolare perché sulla relazione 6584086 c'è un operator che non sapevo se si estendesse su tutto il sentiero o solo su una parte. È un caso che ho in una lista di problemi da risolvere. Io non sono neanche sicuro se "operator"... | |
| 3 | 2022-10-24 12:26 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. Che io sappia in Valle d'Aosta i sentieri sono gestiti dai comuni. Ciao, Andrea | |
| 4 | 2022-10-24 12:33 | dieterdreist | Ho scritto all'autore dell'altra relazione per capire se forse tutto il sentiero è gestito da un unico gestore. In generale non sono molto convinto dell'idea di dover spezzare sentieri locali perché attraversono il confine di un comune. Ciao, Martin | |
| 42134289 by Gian Mario Navillod @ 2016-09-13 19:35 | 1 | 2022-10-24 12:30 | dieterdreist | Ciao Gian Mario Navillod, ho notato che hai inserito il sentiero 11C con un tag "operator=Comune di Nus;Saint-Barthélemy", e vorrei chiedere se per caso sapessi se il comune fa manutenzione della segnaletica, oppure del sentiero fisico (percorsi)? E se forse questo operator si esten... |
| 127001754 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-04 15:25 | 1 | 2022-10-22 16:58 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. Il sentiero 8 era già presente (in parte) nella relazione 11519295. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 12:13 | dieterdreist | è giusto anche questo (una piccola parte in mezzo soltanto, ma c'era), ho unificato le relazioni, grazie. | |
| 127783413 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-19 13:24 | 1 | 2022-10-22 16:50 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. In questo changeset è stato inserito il sentiero 3B nella relazione 14711575 ma questo era già parzialmente inserito nella relazione 7487519. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 12:06 | dieterdreist | hai ragione, ho fatto un merge e tolto la relation completa ma nuova, grazie. | |
| 127783740 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-19 13:31 | 1 | 2022-10-22 16:47 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. La relazione 14711604 è un duplicato della 4156821. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 11:58 | dieterdreist | hai ragione, ho unificato i sentieri e tolto il duplicato, grazie! | |
| 126273645 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-09-16 17:55 | 1 | 2022-10-22 09:59 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero 11 è sbagliato. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 11:48 | dieterdreist | grazie, corretto. Questo purtroppo era già sfuggito da 3 anni agli occhi dei mappatori, ottimo che abbiamo risolto con il tuo aiuto. | |
| 127784329 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-19 13:43 | 1 | 2022-10-22 09:55 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. La relazione 14711641 è un duplicato della 13878204. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 11:41 | dieterdreist | sì, questo per ora risolto (come anche comunicato in mail parallelo). | |
| 127786638 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-19 14:35 | 1 | 2022-10-22 09:04 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. La relazione 14711846 sembra un duplicato della 14432391. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 11:38 | dieterdreist | sì, questo è un problema monitorato che risolveremmo a breve con aiuto di conoscenza locale del gestore.Grazie comunque della segnalazione | |
| 127784960 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-19 13:56 | 1 | 2022-10-22 08:59 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. La relazione 14711705 è duplicata della 13878205. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 11:36 | dieterdreist | grazie, ho risolto,ciao,Martin | |
| 127413699 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-12 12:40 | 1 | 2022-10-22 08:54 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. La relazione 14687539 è duplicata della 12754206. Inoltre, l'osmc:symbol è errato. Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 11:30 | dieterdreist | grazie, ho risolto | |
| 127434433 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-10-12 20:16 | 1 | 2022-10-22 08:48 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. Questo (e altri) percorsi circolari non dovrebbero avere il tag roundtrip=yes? Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2022-10-24 11:24 | dieterdreist | Inizialmente avevo dubbi sul tag "roundtrip" perché il significato viene contestato, ma poi ho deciso di mettere il tag nonostante perché è comunque il metodo attualmente usato (in inglese la parola roundtrip significa "andata e ritorno" e non significa "... | |
| 3 | 2022-10-24 11:31 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. Cambio oculista. Intendevo proprio metterlo, non ho visto il tag. Sorry. Ciao, Andrea | |
| 125892477 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-09-07 09:33 | 1 | 2022-10-23 15:16 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,419 | Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero "6 -7" è errato. Ciao, Andrea PS Ma il ref è corretto? |
| 2 | 2022-10-23 16:32 | dieterdreist | Questi sono dei casi che andranno ritoccato una ulteriore volta, sono da riverificare sul campo se non si dovesse riuscire a chiarire il problema. | |
| 123488962 by ross-map @ 2022-07-11 19:23 | 1 | 2022-10-21 10:15 | dieterdreist | Ciao, ho notato che hai riclassificato alcuni track in path, ma dalle foto aerei e dello storico (dal 2011) sembrano sempre stati track. È cambiata la situazione?Saluti,Martin |
| 2 | 2022-10-21 10:17 | dieterdreist | Per dire, a Provence non si arriva più con un fuori strada? | |
| 3 | 2022-10-21 10:48 | ross-map ♦6 | Ciao Martin, ho controllato quello che mi hai segnalato, e vedo che effettivamente la way che porta a Provence da Pielo è un path. Dopo essere stato un week end in zona, avevo insertito con una relazione il sentiero 4A, ma probabilmente poi innavertitamente ho cambiato anche la relazione del... | |
| 4 | 2022-10-21 11:52 | dieterdreist | Ciao Ross, correggo volentieri, ma credo ci sia un typo e volevi scrivere si tratta di un "track", giusto?saluti e buona giornata a te,Martin | |
| 5 | 2022-10-21 11:58 | ross-map ♦6 | ovviamente volevo scrivere track | |
| 6 | 2022-10-21 15:26 | dieterdreist | grazie, messo,buona mappatura,Martin | |
| 123984387 by AlCeRoma @ 2022-07-23 17:19 | 1 | 2022-10-17 18:04 | dieterdreist | Ciao, ho notato che hai dato il nome magazzini generali alla scuola superiore dei VVF, era intenzionale? way 96646927saluti Martin |
| 2 | 2022-10-18 07:24 | AlCeRoma ♦9 | è il nome che compare sulla facciata dell'edificio | |
| 3 | 2022-10-18 07:55 | dieterdreist | hai ragione, ma forse non è comunque il nome di questo edificio (suppongo senza saperne niente che si riferisca ad un uso pregresso di tutta l’area? Forse old_name? Senza sapere niente di più, si potrebbe mettere magazzini generali come tag “inscription” dell’ed... | |
| 4 | 2022-10-18 08:48 | AlCeRoma ♦9 | Ovviamente lì non ci sono più i magazzini generali della dogana. old_name può andare bene | |
| 5 | 2022-10-18 10:18 | dieterdreist | sì, ma old_name dove? Sull’edificio sarebbe riferito al edificio, mentre probabilmente andrebbe su tutto il sito, però poi magazzini generali non è il vecchio nome della scuola superiore dei vigili del fuoco (tag che sta sull’area). (al proposito, c’è ... | |
| 6 | 2022-10-18 14:31 | AlCeRoma ♦9 | volendo si può mettere all'intera area specificando che in passato il sito aveva un altro uso (c'è un tag specifico che però non ricordo).No, non c'è una stazione dei vigili all'interno. | |
| 7 | 2022-10-18 15:26 | dieterdreist | sì, questo lo conosco ed avevo pensato anch’io che sarebbe una ipotesi, creare una area per quello che era, il concetto lo trovi nel wiki sotto “lifecycle prefix”, potrebbe essere “was:landuse=industrial” (forse esiste qualcosa di meglio per le aree doganali, non... | |
| 8 | 2022-10-19 07:31 | AlCeRoma ♦9 | Eviterei di creare una nuova area solo per mettere dati storici. Meglio old_name o inscription sull'edificio già presente. | |
| 9 | 2022-10-19 07:50 | dieterdreist | perfetto, d’accordo con te. | |
| 12879129 by nuvolabianca @ 2012-08-27 13:14 | 1 | 2022-10-17 09:42 | dieterdreist | Ciao Nuvolabianca,ho qualche dubbio sulla way 178153275, che ora è inserito come access=private, ma probabilmente quello che si intende è vehicle=forestry, o motor_vehicle=forestry. Così come attualmente è inserito significa che non si può legalmente camminare su... |
| 126735853 by dieterdreist-CAI @ 2022-09-28 11:15 | 1 | 2022-10-14 14:23 | matteo564 ♦16 | Buongiorno, sarebbero graditi commenti ai changeset più specifici e informativi, grazie e buon lavoro. |
| 2 | 2022-10-14 16:10 | dieterdreist | grazie, capisco che possono sembrare quasi identici, ma in realtà descrivono proprio quello che faccio: inserisco itinerari (sentieri) nella Regione Valle D'Aosta. Il numero del sentiero è alla fine del commento. Talvolta faccio edit "intorno al sentiero" che sono comunq... | |
| 3 | 2022-10-14 16:28 | matteo564 ♦16 | Va benissimo, non avevo notato (cosa che può sfuggire anche ad altri), quindi consiglierei proprio per questo di differenziarli e magari specificare se vengono inseriti altri elementi, se vengono fatte correzioni, collegamenti, modifiche, aggiunte, se non c'è niente di particolare... | |
| 56933177 by Enzo de Roma @ 2018-03-06 12:09 | 1 | 2022-10-07 20:24 | dieterdreist | appena visto che in questo changeset è stato cancellato la via d’accesso agli uffi del comune, way 546596234Perché? |
| 2 | 2022-10-07 20:29 | dieterdreist | puro vandalismo, vergogna ti di vandalizzare un bene di tutti. | |
| 36006022 by nuvolabianca @ 2015-12-17 10:21 | 1 | 2022-10-06 10:46 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno Nuvolabianca,ho notato che hai segnato il way 61009814 come access=private, ma mi sembra dai dati delle Regione Valle D'Aosta ci passi il sentiero 3. Forse ti riccordi ancora?Grazie,Martin |
| 41924615 by Gian Mario Navillod @ 2016-09-05 08:34 | 1 | 2022-10-04 11:34 | dieterdreist | buongiorno Gian Mario Navillod,ho notato che hai messo delle strade ad "access=private", per esempio way 340494099Guardando la situazione, sembra ci passi un sentiero escursionistico gestito dalla Regione. Forse invece di access=private si dovrebbe taggare motor_vehicle=private?Gen... |
| 2 | 2022-10-04 19:50 | Gian Mario Navillod ♦5 | Buongiorno Martin, appena sopra il parcheggio c'è un cartello di divieto di transito con la scritta "strada privata a fondo cieco divieto di transito". Se mi sono sbagliato mi "corrigerai" ;-) Buon mapping! | |
| 3 | 2022-10-04 21:55 | dieterdreist | Ciao Gian Mario, grazie per la risposta, quindi mi confermi che il divieto di transito si applica anche ai pedoni. Apposto, non bisogna fare nulla, access=private ci sta in questo caso. Ho cambiato la classe della strada in "service", visto che si tratta di una strada di accesso, o diresti... | |
| 126925539 by Friendly_Ghost @ 2022-10-03 09:17 | 1 | 2022-10-03 23:09 | dieterdreist | Hi, this is an automated edit but I don’t find documentation here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Automated_edits_logHave you discussed your plans and sought community approval for this edit? Cheers Martin |
| 2 | 2022-10-04 08:07 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | This isn't very automated. I checked all the tags to verify if they indeed refer to Wikimedia Commons. | |
| 3 | 2022-10-04 17:02 | dieterdreist | ok. but you are removing tags. E.g. I added all the images as "image" and now I do not find them anymore, because you not only added the wikimedia_commons tag, you also removed the "image" tag. | |
| 4 | 2022-10-04 17:03 | dieterdreist | did you have a look at the pictures? Have you seen a fountain picture or two? ;-) | |
| 5 | 2022-10-04 18:49 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | "you are removing tags"Not at all, I'm just retagging them under the key that's specifically intended for Wikimedia Commons images. No information is lost."now I do not find them anymore"Not in the image=* key, no, but you will find them under wikimedia_comm... | |
| 6 | 2022-10-04 18:50 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | I hope that answers your concerns and questions well enough :) | |
| 7 | 2022-10-04 19:53 | dieterdreist | You confirm that you are removing tags and break other people’s apps without prior notification or timeline or respecting the rules for such large scale retagging, so clearly I am not happy having it discovered. On the other hand, personally it doesn’t matter much to me, because some tim... | |
| 8 | 2022-10-04 20:18 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | "you are removing tags"No, I retag it to the key that we have for Wikimedia Commons images. I thought I mentioned this already."break other people’s apps"I'm not responsible for other people's apps, only for the map data in my edits. I haven't rem... | |
| 9 | 2022-10-04 21:11 | dieterdreist | "No, I retag it to the key that we have for Wikimedia Commons images. I thought I mentioned this already."you are removing tags and adding different tags. That's what it looks like. You can pretend you are "transforming" tags, but what you actually do is removing tags an... | |
| 10 | 2022-10-04 21:14 | dieterdreist | anyway, while you should try to respect the guidelines, I think this particular edit has its merit, the "file:"-URLs in the image tag, where everybody expects an http-link, had their problems. Thank you for performing it and discussing about it. | |
| 11 | 2022-10-04 23:59 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | "what you actually do is removing tags and adding the values with a different key."This is true."you may be responsible for breaking them, by performing huge edits which might force the devs of other software to add code in order to maintain the status quo"It's c... | |
| 70411992 by erikvasco @ 2019-05-19 14:22 | 1 | 2022-10-04 08:33 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno Erik,ho notato che hai inserito tanti "turn restrictions" che non sono da mappare perché sono già impliciti dalla geometria (senso unico delle strade). In sostanza non mappiamo una restrizione per ogni cartello che si trova, ma soltanto i punti dove la restrizi... |
| 51296467 by alequey @ 2017-08-21 09:17 | 1 | 2022-09-29 16:52 | dieterdreist | Ciao Alequey,ho notato che hai cambiato la sterrata qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141079021da track in path, ma dalle foto aerei sembra proprio un track. Mi puoi confermare che la modifica in path è stata coscientemente e non per sbaglio?Grazie,Martin |
| 2 | 2022-09-29 17:18 | alequey ♦1 | Si, ero in dubbio se mettere track con limitazioni d'accesso, poichè è una poderale ad uso agricolo privato, ma è anche indicata come sentiero del parco. Indicarla come track forse trae in inganno e qualcuno ci si avventura. Anche se è parecchio che non ci passo... | |
| 3 | 2022-09-29 17:19 | alequey ♦1 | intendevo ci si avventura con i mezzi | |
| 4 | 2022-09-29 17:20 | alequey ♦1 | Se vuoi puoi tranquillamente modificarlo, grazie | |
| 5 | 2022-09-29 20:08 | dieterdreist | ah ok, grazie della veloce risposta, allora ci metto un divieto per mezzi motorizzati ad eccezione di uso agricolo?Perché la distinzione tra path e track è la larghezza. I sentieri possono anche essere track (talvolta hanno anche tratti su strada). | |
| 6 | 2022-09-30 09:47 | dieterdreist | messo, grazie per il tuo aiuto.saluti,Martin | |
| 7 | 2022-09-30 10:13 | alequey ♦1 | prego buon lavoro | |
| 93803846 by Antanicus @ 2020-11-09 14:08 | 1 | 2022-09-24 08:50 | dieterdreist | ciao, ho notato che hai aggiunto il tag crossing=zebra agli incroci con semafori, il tag corretto è crossing=traffic_signalssaluti Martin |
| 126417850 by GBAB @ 2022-09-20 11:10 | 1 | 2022-09-21 21:34 | dieterdreist | did you discuss this mechanical edit? Your similar edits in Italy have already been reverted by the data working group, please do not remove "crossing" tags from objects. |
| 2 | 2022-09-21 21:37 | dieterdreist | FWIW, crossing is still the standard tag to describe crossing typology, crossing_ref is not even a sixth: http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/crossing/&***/crossing_ref/Please revert your undicussed mass edits and respect the guidelines for such edits. | |
| 3 | 2022-09-23 07:08 | GBAB ♦101 | Lieber dieterdreist,please look also at this graph:http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/crossing/zebra&***/crossing_ref/zebra* * * * *As far as I can see, for a pedestrian crossing you can use both crossing= and crossing_ref= tags for its attributes.crossing= refers to the type o... | |
| 4 | 2022-09-23 07:52 | dieterdreist | Please find my answer on one of the other offending changesets: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126418481 | |
| 126418481 by GBAB @ 2022-09-20 11:26 | 1 | 2022-09-21 13:00 | dieterdreist | undiscussed automatic edit? Didn’t have a thorough view yet, but apparently removed crossing tags |
| 2 | 2022-09-21 13:56 | GBAB ♦101 | I have simply changed crossing=zebra to crossing_ref=zebra. Nothing was removed. | |
| 3 | 2022-09-21 17:48 | Dino Michelini ♦321 | Da un controllo rapido mi mi sembra che hai fatto molti di più di quello che scrivi... | |
| 4 | 2022-09-21 17:57 | GBAB ♦101 | Direi di no, almeno non con intenzione. Spero che non abbia rotto nessuna relazione importante o cose del genere… | |
| 5 | 2022-09-21 18:03 | Dino Michelini ♦321 | Vedi qui https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=126418481#6/42.306/12.675 | |
| 6 | 2022-09-21 18:04 | Dino Michelini ♦321 | e anche ui https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-edits-tile/#13/41.9222/12.3550 | |
| 7 | 2022-09-22 03:49 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126485899, 126467266, 126475461, 126480683, 126483951 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mass edit of zebra crossings in Italy | |
| 8 | 2022-09-23 06:52 | GBAB ♦101 | Carissimo Dino,anche cosi' mantengo la mia posizione che ho cambiato solo i pedestrian crossings. Se i loro puntini fanno parte di strade, allora puo' sembrare che anche la strada stessa sia stata modificata. | |
| 9 | 2022-09-23 07:09 | GBAB ♦101 | Lieber dieterdreist, carissimo Dino,please look also at this graph:http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/crossing/zebra&***/crossing_ref/zebra* * * * *As far as I can see, for a pedestrian crossing you can use both crossing= and crossing_ref= tags for its attributes.crossing= refe... | |
| 10 | 2022-09-23 07:44 | dieterdreist | Dear GBAB, what you call "changing the tag crossing to crossing_ref", effectively means removing the crossing tag. There is no reason to do this, you can add crossing_ref tags to crossings without removing the "crossing" tag.Generally, all automated edits have to follow the rul... | |
| 11 | 2022-09-23 07:49 | dieterdreist | Regarding to usage chronology, I invite you to have a look at "crossing": https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/crossing#chronology(only organic growth) and on "crossing_ref", which clearly shows automated tagging operations at least twice (despite none of them following the... | |
| 126418461 by GBAB @ 2022-09-20 11:25 | 1 | 2022-09-21 13:44 | dieterdreist | undiscussed massedit |
| 2 | 2022-09-22 03:49 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126485899, 126467266, 126475461, 126480683, 126483951 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mass edit of zebra crossings in Italy | |
| 126418471 by GBAB @ 2022-09-20 11:26 | 1 | 2022-09-21 13:44 | dieterdreist | undiscussed mass edit |
| 2 | 2022-09-22 03:49 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126485899, 126467266, 126475461, 126480683, 126483951 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mass edit of zebra crossings in Italy | |
| 125299062 by luca_sere @ 2022-08-24 06:23 | 1 | 2022-09-16 08:29 | dieterdreist | Hi Luca, I just noticed you added a hiking trail based on the geoportal, but you totally missed to integrate it with the existing data. At some place, the path (IMHO it could be a track, based on the shape and amount of traffic on Strava) you added, crosses an existing track without connection (your... |
| 2 | 2022-09-16 08:52 | dieterdreist | Altre due cose: le highway non dovrebbero praticamente mai essere conesse con i landuse (foreste ecc.) e tantomeno con i confini amministrativi. Non devi fissare i problemi di questo edit perché l'ho già fatto (ti scrivo solo per spiegare cosa ho notato).Un altro tema ancora son... | |
| 101625564 by Jack Bertone @ 2021-03-24 08:07 | 1 | 2022-09-15 08:28 | dieterdreist | In questo changeset è stato introdotto la way 921603750 con la classe "living_street", lo trovo improbabile, forse si tratta di una residential? service=alley? footway? "layer=-1" da solo non è sufficiente, sarebbero da indicare le situazioni dove si passa sotto una... |
| 126031160 by dieterdreist @ 2022-09-10 22:04 | 1 | 2022-09-11 17:04 | mariotomo ♦1,896 | hi Dieter … had you considered "mapwithAI"? https://mapwith.ai/rapid#background=Maxar-Premium&datasets=fbRoads,msBuildings&disable_features=boundaries&map=18.36/8.36128/-80.89997&offset=0,3.12 |
| 2 | 2022-09-11 19:24 | dieterdreist | for the initial input of forests and buildings it would be a more effective approach, I just wanted to look around… | |
| 116239084 by Michele Aquilani @ 2022-01-17 06:36 | 1 | 2022-09-03 13:01 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele, ho visto che hai inserito start date 1999 per il ristorante Secchio e Olivaro 2 a Garbatella, ma il posto è stato creato molto dopo, nel 1999 non c’erano lì, c’era un’altro ristorante “L’Incontro”. |
| 99844058 by ivanbranco @ 2021-02-23 17:13 | 1 | 2022-08-31 10:49 | dieterdreist | Ciao Ivan, ho notato che hai aggiunto "brand:wikipedia" con valore "en:Lidl" al Lidl di Ovada, ma non mi risulta tratti di questo Lidl, perché l'articolo tratta di "Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG". Ha veramente senso aggiungere un riferimento del brand a wikiped... |
| 2 | 2022-08-31 11:02 | ivanbranco ♦2,701 | Ciao Martin, non ho capito. Anche il Wikidata lo chiama "Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG". nel value di P1448. In tutto il database vengono ripetuti i tag wikidata e wikipedia, es. Ovada stessa è "wikidata=Q17629+wikipedia=it:Ovada" | |
| 3 | 2022-08-31 15:10 | dieterdreist | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256020379l‘operator è Lidl Italia s.r.l. a socio unicoL’ho verificato. Forse la GmbH & Co. KG è quel „socio unico“? | |
| 4 | 2022-08-31 15:20 | dieterdreist | Scusa, non è GmbH, è „Stiftung & Co. KG“, mi sembra che controllino completamente la Srl., quindi a posto. Sarebbe forse meglio linkare a it:Lidl perché menzionano la Lidl Srl. | |
| 5 | 2022-08-31 15:24 | dieterdreist | in realtà, mentre per l’oggetto penso potrebbe avere senso linkare (o no, secondo la situazione) wikipedia e wikidata, per le proprietà come “brand” mi basterebbero 2, “brand” e “brand:wikidata” | |
| 124905315 by dieterdreist @ 2022-08-14 22:14 | 1 | 2022-08-15 05:42 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo dieterdreist,findest Du das wirklich sinnvoll 2 "Betriebe" auf einen Gebäudeumriß zu legen. Wer wertet das korrekt aus?Grüße |
| 2 | 2022-08-15 05:45 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | PS:Gibt es da wirklich 2 Brauereien:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180247664/history- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086295934/history? | |
| 3 | 2022-08-15 06:13 | dieterdreist | wo steht dass es dort 2 Brauereien gibt? Eins ist eine Brauereigaststätte, das andere eine Brauerei. Letztere war bisher überhaupt nicht getaggt (building=yes in einem residential landuse) | |
| 4 | 2022-08-15 07:34 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Einmal Brauerei am Gebäudeumriß und einmal Brauerei an der Fläche gibt 2 Brauereien, oder? | |
| 5 | 2022-08-16 00:40 | dieterdreist | ja, je nachdem welche Bedeutung man dem craft=brewery und microbrewery=yes genau zuspricht könnte es sich derzeit um 2 Brauereien handeln, was schlecht wäre. Eigentlich hätte ich wohl craft=brewer setzen müssen und nicht brewery? | |
| 6 | 2022-08-18 16:34 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo dieterdreist, bereingst Du das noch mit den 2 Brauerei-Einträgen? Es gilt doch die OSM-Regel ein Objekt in der realen Welt = ich ein OSM-Objekt, oder?Ich weiß ja, daß Du bezüglich Landuse sehr kleinlich bist. Aber einfach ein landuse=industrial über ein landuse... | |
| 7 | 2022-08-18 17:58 | dieterdreist | sorry, war zuletzt immer unterwegs, das mit der Brauerei mache ich gleich, aber am landuse mache ich mobil nicht rum, wenn das “richtig” sein soll dass die ganze Fläche residential landuse sei, dann stört ein überlappendes industrial auch nicht weiter, das müsste jema... | |
| 8 | 2022-08-18 18:12 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Sorry,aber so penibel wie Du Dich sonst gibst, ist da mit den überlappenden Landuse für mich nicht akzebtal. Aber wir können das ja gerne im OSM-Forum weiter diskutieren! | |
| 9 | 2022-08-18 18:19 | dieterdreist | ja gern. Habe den craft jetzt in brewer umgewandelt, die Gaststätte ist keine Brauerei, aber es arbeitet ein Brauer dort. microbrewery ist wohl keine Brauerei sondern ein Attribut von Gaststätten und Pubs dass dort in kleinen Mengen selbstgebrautes Bier angeboten wird, das habe ich gelasse... | |
| 10 | 2022-08-19 06:41 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Auszug aus dem Wiki DE:Tag:craft=brewery:>>Eine handwerkliche Brauerei ist ein kleiner, unabhängiger Betrieb, der Bier nach traditionellen Methoden herstellt. <<Da steht nichts von einem Brauer / Braumeister sonder es wird von einer Handwerks-Brauerei gesprochen!Bei craft ge... | |
| 11 | 2022-08-19 17:16 | dieterdreist | was du zitierst ist craft=brewery, das habe ich ja geändert am Restaurant in craft=brewer, was auch dem ursprünglichen Konzept des tags entspricht (Berufe bzw. Arbeitsstätten eines Handwerkers zu beschreiben). Es gibt sicherlich größere Brauereien als Blank’s, fü... | |
| 12 | 2022-08-20 06:00 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | oK, du hast am Gaststätten-Gebäude das von brewery auf brewer geändert. Aber ist es üblich den Beruf eines Gastwirtes / Restaurantbesitzers einzutragen. Das ist mir absolut neu. Und wer ist eigentlich Leiter der Gaststätte. Nach meinem Wissen ist das Frau Blank.Ob das ei... | |
| 13 | 2022-08-24 11:22 | dieterdreist | Mikrobrauerei ist nicht klar definiert, könnte hier passen oder nicht. Brauereigasthof ist mit craft=brewer angedeutet, allerdings fehlt der Hotelanteil bisher glaube ich noch.„Fabrik“ ist auch nicht unbedingt ein Riesending, Produktionsstätten gibt es auch kleinere, man_made... | |
| 14 | 2022-08-24 13:17 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Du drehst - mal wieder - alles so hin, wie es Dir paßt! Super.Weitere Diskusion sinnlos. | |
| 15 | 2022-08-24 14:59 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Klarstellung:Weitere Diskussionen - mit Dir - sinnlos! | |
| 16 | 2022-08-24 15:53 | dieterdreist | ich versuche es so hinzudrehen, dass es für alle passt. Wo siehst du derzeit noch ein Problem? | |
| 63481390 by dieterdreist @ 2018-10-13 10:00 | 1 | 2022-08-08 10:04 | Valerio_Bozzolan ♦26 | Ciao @dieterdreistHo notato questa attività commerciale "Naimul Travles" ma forse c'è un refuso e si intendeva "Naimul Travels". Cosa ne pensi?Scusa il disturbo ciaao :) |
| 2 | 2022-08-24 10:19 | dieterdreist | sembrerebbe un refuso, ma ho trovato la stessa dicitura anche più volte in rete, quindi suppongo si siano registrati/stanno operando con un typo nel nome ;-) | |
| 3 | 2022-08-24 10:21 | dieterdreist | in realtà "la rete" probabilmente ha copiato da noi, quindi non vale come conferma. Non so neanche se esiste ancora questo posto. Per ora non cambio niente, ma se mi ricordo cerco di farci caso la prossima volta che ci passo. | |
| 4 | 2022-08-24 10:22 | Valerio_Bozzolan ♦26 | Oppure... hai sgamato gente che fa import da OSM! :D | |
| 5 | 2022-08-24 10:28 | dieterdreist | no, dicevano proprio "dati da OpenStreetMap" | |
| 90480312 by Agriturismo La Valle dei Castagni @ 2020-09-06 13:24 | 1 | 2021-06-30 15:27 | alessandrocarmeli ♦236 | come mai rimuovere? |
| 2 | 2021-07-03 06:58 | Agriturismo La Valle dei Castagni ♦2 | Ciò che è stato pubblicato sul sitoweb della Open Street Map Foundation è un abuso su nostra proprietà privata. La proprietà privata è tutelata dalla legge italiana e dalla pubblicità immobiliare, l'area è segnalata con apposita segnaletic... | |
| 3 | 2021-07-03 10:06 | alessandrocarmeli ♦236 | Ciò scritto non vuol dire assolutamente niente. Se voi guardate streetwiew passa vicino a voi e ci sono anche immagini satellitari. | |
| 4 | 2021-07-03 10:28 | Agriturismo La Valle dei Castagni ♦2 | ATTENZIONE, ULTIMO AVVERTIMENTO !QUESTA È UNA DELLE NOSTRE PROPRIETÀ PRIVATE ED E’ VIETATO L’INGRESSO ! I VOSTRI TRACCIATI SULLA NOSTRA PROPRIETÀ LEDONO I NOSTRI DIRITTI E PORTATO A DANNI E VANDALISMI MOLTO CONSISTENTI. CHIUNQUE VOGLIA ACCAMPARE QUALSIASI DIRIT... | |
| 5 | 2021-07-03 10:57 | alessandrocarmeli ♦236 | ciò non vuol dire assolutamente niente. I tag di OSM fanno si che indichino i vari tipi di accesso (privato, finchè il proprietario lo concede, no causa frana...). Non so, inoltre cosa centrano i vandalismi con openstreetmap. Se intendete che la gente vi entra in proprietà cau... | |
| 6 | 2021-07-03 11:29 | Agriturismo La Valle dei Castagni ♦2 | I inform you that your answers will also be sent to the legal office and Data Working Group of the Open Street Map Foundation located in Cambridge (UK). For these reasons, comments will now be in English only. Arrivederci._______ATTENTION !!!THIS IS OUR PRIVATE PROPERTY AND ENTRANCE IS FORBI... | |
| 7 | 2021-07-03 11:49 | alessandrocarmeli ♦236 | Io non ho mai realizzato la traccia, sto solo commentando un changeset. Desidero vedere la chat con il DWG (che attualmente da quel che ho capito non è più operativo essendo fuori da uno stato UE) | |
| 8 | 2021-07-03 14:22 | dieterdreist | infatti, in OpenStreetMap questo percorso è già inserito come privato, quale legge italiana si pensa sia stata infranta? | |
| 9 | 2021-07-03 14:34 | alessandrocarmeli ♦236 | Appunto: come stavo dicendo: anche GoogleEart e StreetView fanno foto aeree alle nostre proprietà e dal punto di vista "stradale" alle nostre auto, ma non è che mi vado a lamentare a Milano nella sede di Google. Non esistono leggi che ci impediscono una mappatura. | |
| 10 | 2021-07-03 17:14 | dieterdreist | quello in via conclusiva deciderà un tribunale, sembrerebbe che i gestori dell’agriturismo abbiano un avvocato che lo pensa diversamente | |
| 12 | 2022-08-23 09:05 | dieterdreist | grazie per le info, penso sia stato utile discutere anche qui, così le informazioni rimangono facilmente reperibili | |
| 24693188 by mcheckimport @ 2014-08-12 04:41 | 1 | 2022-08-05 22:33 | dieterdreist | su via del mare hai aggiunto tanti tags =no che non capsico perché, ad esempio non ho mai visto un cartello per foot=no… |
| 98113550 by Antanicus @ 2021-01-25 10:49 | 1 | 2022-07-06 17:28 | dieterdreist | Hi Antanicus, in this changeset you have deleted some objects, including the feltrinelli bookshop with the comment "misc fixes to area". Could you please explain what kind of fix was applied here?Cheers,Martin |
| 2 | 2022-07-06 17:40 | dieterdreist | It seems as if you deleted the whole block and then redrew it, but this is frowned upon because typically information is lost. For the same reason, you should not convert polygon POIs to points by deleting the polygons, it leads to data loss (for example the post office in this changeset). | |
| 3 | 2022-07-07 08:11 | Antanicus ♦8 | Hi dieterdreist, I must have overlooked that POI, by bad. I'll add it back immediately. I'll add back the post office as well.Re. the deletion of the block, I did so because the previous work was almost impossible to fix: the block outline was overlaid on top of a residential area outl... | |
| 4 | 2022-07-07 08:15 | dieterdreist | hi, thank you for replying, I forgot to mention that I already restored the Feltrinelli and the post office…have a good day,Martin | |
| 77338193 by dieterdreist @ 2019-11-20 17:21 | 1 | 2019-11-21 16:17 | fayor ♦125 | Ti scrivo qua per ribadirti quanto già spiegato nell'altro changeset: non capisci o non vuoi capire che non ci sono entità amministrative al di sotto dei municipi.Quartiere X Ostiense è una ZONA TOPONOMASTICA, OSTIENSE (11A) è una ZONA URBANISTICA e ce ne sono a... |
| 2 | 2019-11-26 09:52 | dieterdreist | Lo so che Quartiere X Ostiense è una Zona Toponomastica e l'ho anche taggato così, e che Ostiense 11A è una Zona urbanistica. Non saprei cosa crea più confusione, non mappare le zone urbanistiche o mapparle, ma in generale, visto che sono mappabili e verificabili, le... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-26 09:55 | dieterdreist | Scusa, vorrei aggiungere, non so se "zona toponomastica" è il termine giusto per i Quartieri, è un "Quartiere", cioè un tipo di oggetto toponomastico ben definito nel constesto di Roma. | |
| 4 | 2019-11-26 15:15 | fayor ♦125 | Dire che "queste zone urbanistiche sono suddivisioni dei municipi E QUINDI sono di natura amministrativa" è una grossa inesattezza,Così come dire che "non corrispondono ad una giunta o un organo legislativo, sono parti dei municipi, ma CIO' NON TOGLIE la loro na... | |
| 5 | 2019-11-26 19:22 | dieterdreist | Preferisco chiedere direttamente a te: cosa suggerisci per le zone urbanistiche? C’è un motivo per cui pensi non siano adatti per il tag admin_level=11? | |
| 6 | 2022-06-22 18:02 | Claudio Tam ♦20 | Buongiorno fayor e dieterdreist!Stavo cercando un modo di identificare i "Quartieri" tramite i tag. Vi propongo uno schema di tag di tutti i suburbi/rioni/quartieri/zone toponomastici di roma (no urbanistici/amministrativi), che sia più "standard" possibile.comune a ... | |
| 7 | 2022-06-22 18:23 | dieterdreist | Buonasera Claudio,esiste un forum, forum.osm.org che però per l’Italia non è mai stato utilizzato molto, ed ora sta per essere dismesso (perché il software non viene più mantenuto) e traslocato sulla nuova piattaforma community.osm.orgInvece la community itali... | |
| 8 | 2022-06-22 18:31 | dieterdreist | forse un buon punto per documentare la situazione nonché il tagging sarebbe la pagina di Roma nel wiki di OpenStreetMap | |
| 120855693 by dieterdreist @ 2022-05-11 19:37 | 1 | 2022-06-21 18:57 | 無調味堅果 ♦12 | please add name:zh-Hant=哈爾基夫 |
| 2 | 2022-06-21 19:53 | dieterdreist | sorry, I do not read Chinese and I cannot judge this proposal, please add it yourself | |
| 121605860 by fberthold @ 2022-05-28 08:11 | 1 | 2022-05-30 06:48 | DD1GJ ♦2,288 | Wieso entfernst Du kommentarlos das bicycle=no? |
| 2 | 2022-05-30 10:16 | fberthold ♦7 | Kommentarlos war vielleicht etwas ungeschickt. Ich habe es entfernt, weil es vorher auch nicht da war, jemand hat es hinzugefügt. Ich fahre dort selbst hin und wieder MTB. Es gibt dort kein Verbot. | |
| 3 | 2022-05-30 10:42 | DD1GJ ♦2,288 | Im Stadtwald von Baden-Baden und im Gemeindewald von Sinzheim gibt es Konzepte, die durch die Ausweisung von Wander- und MTB-Strecken für eine Entflechtung auf engen Wegen sorgen. Eines gesonderten Verbotsbeschilderung für Fahrräder bedarf es dabei nicht unbedingt, denn in Baden-W&uum... | |
| 4 | 2022-05-30 15:57 | fberthold ♦7 | Und schon haben wir einen Interessenskonflikt. Die 2 m Regel ist mir bekannt, da sie aber in BW praktisch nicht angewendet wird, kann man sie auch gleich wieder vergessen. Dann müsste man jeden Pfad in OSM für Fahrräder verbieten, was angesichts der Realen Lage problematisch wär... | |
| 5 | 2022-05-30 22:23 | DD1GJ ♦2,288 | Diese allgemeine Diskussion gab es bereits letztes Jahr für Rheinland-Pfalz. Dort ist die Regelung zwar nicht so eindeutig wie in Baden-Württemberg, aber das bicycle=no wird dennoch eingesetzt und von den meisten Mitwirkenden befürwortet. Es mag sein, dass die Regel im letzten Jahrzeh... | |
| 6 | 2022-06-01 12:42 | mcliquid ♦1,863 | Hallo zusammen, sollte hier nicht die OTG-Regel greifen? Existiert an diesen Wegen tatsächlich das Verkehrszeichen DE:254?Falls nein, dann sollte hier aus meiner Sicht auch kein bicycle=no platziert werden. Wenn es eine übergreifende Regelung in einem Bundesland gibt, sollte dies in mein... | |
| 7 | 2022-06-01 18:05 | extremecarver ♦3 | Wer implizite Verbote taggen möchte - soll sich dafür bitte ein eigenes Tag aussuchen. Den angenommen implizite Regeln werden geändert - so muss man von der Datenbasis in der Lage sein diese für den kompletten Bereich der gesetzlichen Änderung automatisch umzuändern. Bi... | |
| 8 | 2022-06-01 23:38 | DD1GJ ♦2,288 | Diese Diskussion hat sich ins Forum verlagert: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75711 | |
| 9 | 2022-06-13 08:45 | dieterdreist | jetzt wird schon seit 2 Wochen diskutiert, und die mtb:scale tags sind immer noch weg, obwohl es ziemlich klar ist dass die nichts mit einem Fahradfahrverbot zu tun haben. Ein erster Schritt könnte deren Wiederherstellung sein… | |
| 10 | 2022-06-14 08:22 | DD1GJ ♦2,288 | Eine "Wiederherstellung" wird der letzte Schritt sein. komoot arbeitet gerade an einer Lösuung, was voraussichtlich bis Ende des Monats dauern wird. | |
| 11 | 2022-06-14 11:15 | dieterdreist | Das ist für uns egal wann Komoot es fixed, wenn die mit bicycle=no nicht umgehen können ist das kein Grund, für den Renderer oder Router zu taggen. | |
| 12 | 2022-06-14 20:34 | DD1GJ ♦2,288 | Router sind kein Problem, denn die berücksichtigen das bicycle=no perfekt.Das Entfernen bzw. Umtaggen der Scales mit "removed:" ist eher ein Taggen gegen den komoot-Remderer. Ich möchte sogar die provokative These in den Raum stellen, dass das Eintragen der MTB-Scales an f&uu... | |
| 122195011 by radlerhh @ 2022-06-10 07:06 | 1 | 2022-06-11 16:28 | uvi ♦133 | Bitte keine Löschungen weiter vornehmen und bitte hier weiter diskutieren https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=864808#p864808 !!! |
| 2 | 2022-06-11 19:20 | dieterdreist | Ob Details interessieren entscheidet der Mapper der sie einträgt, sie rauszulöschen obwohl sie zutreffen ist Vandalismus, bitte sofort damit aufhören. | |
| 121191000 by radlerhh @ 2022-05-19 11:29 | 1 | 2022-06-11 19:18 | dieterdreist | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917710927/historydu hast name und operator hier entfernt, waren die nicht zutreffend? Dann sollten sie korrigiert werden, nicht gelöscht |
| 121864157 by mbeyerle @ 2022-06-02 18:34 | 1 | 2022-06-04 14:28 | EneaSuper ♦457 | Ciao, in questo negozio si vendono ma non si somministrano bevante.Ergo io, entrando, posso acquistare del vino, ma non posso consumarlo in loco. |
| 2 | 2022-06-04 14:58 | mbeyerle ♦45 | Gotcha. If I’m interpreting you correctly I think the specific tagging scheme should be drink:wine=bottled Based on the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:drinkThanks for reviewing! | |
| 3 | 2022-06-04 16:27 | dieterdreist | Please, you should never change tags for objects you don’t know in person, and generally there is no reason to remove a tag like sells:wine if you want to add one with a different key like drink:wine (if it would be correct, which happens to not be the case here but could well exist somewhere ... | |
| 4 | 2022-06-04 16:30 | dieterdreist | drink:wine according to the page you linked is “to describe the specific drink which is served”, so it is not correct with “bottled” either, that would be the case that you would be served bottled wine. | |
| 5 | 2022-06-04 17:02 | mbeyerle ♦45 | Hi Martin, thanks for joining the conversation! While I completely agree with the premise that local knowledge drives quality on OSM, I think there’s definitely a case to be made for making remote fixes (and I think “never” touching objects that a mapper doesn’t know in perso... | |
| 6 | 2022-06-04 17:35 | dieterdreist | If a tag is not in the wiki it doesn’t imply it should be removed. There is no either or for tags unless they are using the same key. In this case it seems a bakery sells wine, so sells:wine seems a perfect fit. drink:* is about a tag where you can specify which drinks a place serves (to consu... | |
| 7 | 2022-06-04 17:48 | mbeyerle ♦45 | drink:* does not imply a beverage is to be consumed on the premises. Otherwise every liquor store tagged with drink:wine would be incorrect. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dalcohol | |
| 8 | 2022-06-04 20:36 | dieterdreist | you are correct that the page states the tag drink is used for beverages served or sold (it is written differently in different places), but still it is not a reason to remove the sells:wine tag because it is more specific and doesn’t include drinks served, it is only about selling them | |
| 9 | 2022-06-05 13:42 | dieterdreist | As we seem to agree that the tag removal was misguided, I reverted this part of this edit. Looking at your profile, I noticed you performed several of these edits which all removed sells:wine so we would have information loss in all these cases. Please discuss semiautomatic edits like this beforehan... | |
| 10 | 2022-06-05 15:19 | bhietsch ♦66 | Martin, I disagree that mbeyerle's tag removal was misguided simply by the premise that sells:wine is a more specific tag. Would it be logical for users to replace generally standardized tagging schemes with keys or tags that they believe add specificity on the notion that it will provide end u... | |
| 11 | 2022-06-05 16:38 | dieterdreist | I did not say to remove anything, and I did not remove the drink:wine tag which mbeyerle has added to this place without knowing it, despite believing it has generally a problem as it isn’t clear whether it is only for places serving a specific drink or also for sale only. I agree that _replac... | |
| 12 | 2022-06-05 16:51 | dieterdreist | bhietsch, can you understand it makes a huge difference whether a bakery sells wine (to drink at home) or it serves wine to drink on the premises? A tag that can mean both seems almost useless to me, if this was the choice in your part of the world it may work for you, around here we buy the wine in... | |
| 13 | 2022-06-05 18:15 | mbeyerle ♦45 | Hi Martin, First, I wanted to say thanks for the passion for the project and for bringing the local cultural differences to my (our) attention. I see what you mean and agree it's important to not lose fidelity in tagging and wanted to thank you for reviewing and helping accomplish that. H... | |
| 14 | 2022-06-05 18:56 | dieterdreist | great, let’s move over to the wiki | |
| 15 | 2022-06-05 19:52 | dieterdreist | I had missed a section in the wiki about the values for the drink: tag and agree it can be used for this place. It wasn’t documented in the value table but I added it (commonly used already), the generic value is “retail” | |
| 120667339 by SekeRob @ 2022-05-07 12:51 | 1 | 2022-05-23 09:01 | dieterdreist | Hi, you removed the reference to wikipedia for this piece of citywalls, there is now no reference at all for this part. Please revert your changes |
| 2 | 2022-05-23 09:26 | SekeRob ♦1,435 | However wrong it my be in your view, I've added this one and several others sections to the Aurelian wall relation. There are more parts that for whatever reason were never added to the relation on my inventory list. When the time comes I'll convert the 'site' relation to a ... | |
| 3 | 2022-05-23 10:05 | dieterdreist | Thing is, the part in question is not part of any relation, site or other, so now the only way to determine that this is a part of the Aurelian Walls is the name. Please add the wikipedia tag and wikidata tag back, because it is required and it is not wrong. There is no benefit from removing correct... | |
| 121003735 by giorgio92 @ 2022-05-15 08:35 | 1 | 2022-05-15 09:31 | dieterdreist | ciao Giorgio,hai rimosso un sacco di edifici, come mai?un saluto,Martin |
| 2 | 2022-05-17 07:30 | giorgio92 ♦28 | ciao molti edifici sono delle strutture temporanee | |
| 3 | 2022-05-17 07:33 | dieterdreist | stai dicendo che sono stato rimossi? | |
| 4 | 2022-05-17 07:53 | giorgio92 ♦28 | alcuni non erano corretti, si tratta di edifici troppo piccoli per eg. garage oppure tettoie | |
| 5 | 2022-05-17 08:01 | dieterdreist | in OSM sia garage che tettoie le mappiamo. building=yes va bene come tag, ma building=root e building=garage sarebbe più preciso. Toglierle non è giusto, ti chiedo di ripristinare, grazie. | |
| 6 | 2022-05-17 08:02 | dieterdreist | roof non root, scusa | |
| 7 | 2022-05-17 08:09 | dieterdreist | per dire, "troppo piccolo" non esiste, qualsiasi dimensione va bene. | |
| 8 | 2022-05-18 18:32 | giorgio92 ♦28 | Ciao Martin, perdona il disturbo per ripristinare un elemento cancellato c'è una procedura specifica oppure è necessario disegnarlo ex-novo ? grazie | |
| 9 | 2022-05-18 20:58 | dieterdreist | ci sono possibilità vari, per ricreare un oggetto singolo c'è una funzione in Josm, per revertare tutto un changeset un'altra. Altrimenti ci sono script... | |
| 10 | 2022-05-18 20:58 | dieterdreist | se mi dici i numeri di changeset posso revertare alcuni, tipo questo qui, ok? | |
| 11 | 2022-05-19 12:29 | giorgio92 ♦28 | ok nessun problema puoi reversarlo | |
| 12 | 2022-05-19 12:52 | dieterdreist | fatto. Ci sono altri simili da fare revert? | |
| 13 | 2022-05-20 13:32 | giorgio92 ♦28 | non credo che ci siano altri revert da fare, altri sono stati fatti già da altri utenti | |
| 120896494 by Mariateresa-Magno @ 2022-05-12 15:59 | 1 | 2022-05-16 16:37 | dieterdreist | Hi, just wanted to let you know you have (maybe inadvertedly) uploaded a low resolution version of the lake above the existent lake data ;-)I have removed the problem for you.Have a good day,Martin |
| 121003817 by giorgio92 @ 2022-05-15 08:39 | 1 | 2022-05-15 09:38 | dieterdreist | non capisco le tue modifiche, perché togli gli edifici che prima hai inserito? |
| 121004114 by giorgio92 @ 2022-05-15 08:49 | 1 | 2022-05-15 09:33 | dieterdreist | anche qui vedo soprattutto cancellazioni, di oggetti che non solo erano inseriti da te, ci puoi spiegare le motivazioni? Ciao Martin |
| 117470015 by Norman Spirit @ 2022-02-16 10:32 | 1 | 2022-05-09 09:37 | dieterdreist | hi,can you please explain why you changed the tagging from graveyard to cemetery? |
| 2 | 2022-05-13 21:04 | Norman Spirit ♦10 | A graveyard is only a cemetery adjacent to a church or place of worship. There is no such building here. | |
| 3 | 2022-05-13 23:14 | dieterdreist | I don‘t know, maybe there was? Do you know the place? | |
| 120827218 by mbr1565 @ 2022-05-11 08:25 | 1 | 2022-05-11 10:54 | wkdgs ♦607 | Ähm, warum wurde das gesamte Gebäude gelöscht? Im Änderungskommentar steht ja nur eine neue Adresse. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120827218 |
| 2 | 2022-05-11 11:01 | mbr1565 ♦1 | Der Sitz der Einrichtung befindet sich im Paterweg 54 in Beckum. Details bzw. die Anschriften der einzelnen Wohngruppen sollen zum Schutz der Bewohner im Internet nicht bekannt gegeben werden. | |
| 3 | 2022-05-11 12:53 | wkdgs ♦607 | Aber die Information, dass dort ein Gebäude existiert, das die Hausnummer 50 hat, ist doch öffentlich. Auf https://www.geoportal.nrw/ ist das Gebäude ebenfalls inklusive Adresse eingezeichnet. Zumindest die Information sollte wieder eingetragen werden. | |
| 4 | 2022-05-11 12:54 | wkdgs ♦607 | Aber die Information, dass dort ein Gebäude existiert, das die Hausnummer 50 hat, ist doch öffentlich. Auf https://www.geoportal.nrw/ ist das Gebäude ebenfalls inklusive Adresse eingezeichnet. Zumindest die Information sollte wieder eingetragen werden. --- #R... | |
| 5 | 2022-05-11 13:01 | wkdgs ♦607 | Ich hab das mal im OSM-Forum zur Diskussion gestellt: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=862426#p862426 | |
| 6 | 2022-05-11 13:20 | dieterdreist | wenn man einzelne Adressen taggt aber nicht sagt dass es sich dabei um die Wohngruppe X handelt, dann ist dem Schutzbedürfnis doch Genüge getan. Ein Gebäude an sich ist keine geheime Information, genausowenig wie die Adressen, erst wenn man taggt um was es sich handelt wird ggf. das G... | |
| 7 | 2022-05-11 13:26 | mbr1565 ♦1 | Die Hausnummer ist natürlich kein Geheimnis und wurde nur versehentlich gelöscht. Habe gerade versucht sie wieder hinzuzufügen und hoffe, dass es geklappt hat. Ziel soll nur sein, dass der Name der Einrichtung dort nicht auftaucht. | |
| 114259063 by dieterdreist @ 2021-11-26 11:12 | 1 | 2022-04-15 17:50 | SekeRob ♦1,435 | Hi DieterOsmose is upset over the same wiki reference being used on each section of the Aurelian Walls, like a dozen times. I'd propose that they're all removed from the wall sections and only left on the (site) relation. To my surprise the site relation does have the wikidata key, but... |
| 2 | 2022-04-15 20:15 | dieterdreist | hm, frankly I do not use osmose because from the experiences I had when I looked at it I was disagreeing with what was highlighted. Do we really want to make edits just to silence a qa tool? I won’t and would oppose.But we can have a discussion about the best place to add wikipedia reference... | |
| 3 | 2022-04-16 08:36 | SekeRob ♦1,435 | Glad you agree with what Osmose flagged is in essence correct... it's function is to signal issues which humans are then to assess as Yes, fix, No, false positive. Site is a good relational function to bind non-continuous objects. Duplication of information is bad. 10 parts of a street with sa... | |
| 4 | 2022-04-16 08:46 | dieterdreist | I believe there is a misconception here, I did not write that I concur with osmose. Are you going to remove the name and historic=citywalls tags as well from the individual ways? I also question the “single real world feature”, and in particular that it is a “site” because it... | |
| 5 | 2022-04-22 17:45 | SekeRob ♦1,435 | After doing an inventory of the wall situation few days ago, I've decided now to park the issue FTM as it requires dedicated time to clean this up, remove all the endlessly and inconsistent information duplication to include name:... language tags etc and post a note to each wall part to only a... | |
| 6 | 2022-04-22 18:25 | dieterdreist | I don’t understand why you have to “clean up”, why don’t you simply ignore the tags on the ways and deal with the relation only? | |
| 7 | 2022-04-22 19:01 | SekeRob ♦1,435 | 'Ignore'? You may, I don't. | |
| 8 | 2022-04-22 19:22 | dieterdreist | there is still a lot to draw ;-) | |
| 9 | 2022-04-22 19:25 | dieterdreist | IMHO any pertinent wikipedia link is ok, don’t care for the language if they are linked in wikimedia, and wp is probably better than wikidata links because you can read it, while the wikidata numbers are mostly opaque (better editor support would be helpful) | |
| 117322156 by KartoGrapHiti @ 2022-02-12 13:47 | 1 | 2022-04-22 09:51 | dieterdreist | Hi KartoGrapHiti, sehe gerade, dass Deine "Korrekturen des name tags" teilweise bedeuten, dass der name tag komplett entfernt wurde (z.B. "Verwaltungsgebäude"), und dass teilweise zumindest Informationen verloren gegangen sind, z.B. hier wurde "Philosophikum I" kom... |
| 2 | 2022-04-22 15:29 | KartoGrapHiti ♦85 | Hi Martin,"Verwaltungsgebäude" und der Klammerzusatz "Philosophikum I" sind ja keine Namen, sondern Beschreibungen. Es ist ja nicht so, dass ein Gebäude unter dem Namen "Verwaltungsgebäude" bekannt ist, sondern das ist eine Beschreibung. Da sind sich ei... | |
| 3 | 2022-04-22 15:54 | dieterdreist | Hallo KartoGrapHiti,bei "Verwaltungsgebäude" mag man sich streiten können, das ist sicherlich auch eine Beschreibung, könnte aber lokal auch als Name genutzt werden. Bei "Zugspitze" oder "Düsseldorf" oder lokal z.B. "Alter Friedhof" oder ... | |
| 4 | 2022-04-23 07:57 | KartoGrapHiti ♦85 | Bitte lass uns die Diskussion im Forum weiter führen, es geht hier ja nicht um mich, sondern darum, wie die Community das handhabt. | |
| 97831816 by Dino Michelini @ 2021-01-20 11:03 | 1 | 2022-03-18 11:18 | dieterdreist | Ciao Dino Michelini,cambierei il "name" nel nome italiano. Il resto rimarebbe (compreso name:it se vogliamo), cosa ne pensi?Ciao,Martin |
| 2 | 2022-03-18 11:18 | dieterdreist | scusa, mi riferisco a questo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12213226 | |
| 3 | 2022-03-18 11:33 | Dino Michelini ♦321 | Ciao, avevo posto name in inglese perché considerato che si tratta di un sito UNESCO avesse più "visibilità" sulla mappa. D'altra parte è formalmente corretto quello che scrivi… A questo punto si potrebbe aggiungere qualche altra lingua ad es. quell... | |
| 4 | 2022-03-29 21:49 | dieterdreist | va benissimo, pensavo lo facessi ;-) | |
| 113893120 by LaraRattaggi @ 2021-11-17 11:18 | 1 | 2022-03-21 10:15 | dieterdreist | Hello LaraRattaggi, something went wrong with your map edit, there are a bunch of nodes with only the tags natural=wood and description=map for future.The tag natural=wood is for areas naturally covered with trees, usually these are areas, not nodes.The tag description is for descriptions of fea... |
| 94638957 by ivanbranco @ 2020-11-23 12:48 | 1 | 2022-03-17 10:43 | dieterdreist | Hi,just noticed you have removed the cuisine tag from le Bistrot, shouldn’t it have been modified rather than removing it?Cheers Martin |
| 2 | 2022-03-17 10:56 | ivanbranco ♦2,701 | L'ho sostituito con il tag diet:vegan. Le diete usano il prefisso diet, non sono value del tag cuisine. Come avresti modificato tu? | |
| 3 | 2022-03-17 11:32 | dieterdreist | cuisine=french | |
| 94022927 by ADUOSM @ 2020-11-12 23:26 | 1 | 2022-03-09 11:14 | dieterdreist | Hi, I have seen you changed the common tag office=it to the rarely used combination office=company and company=software_developmentCan you explain your reasoning?Cheers,Martin |
| 2 | 2022-03-14 17:20 | ADUOSM ♦2 | Hello,I simply followed this wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3DcompanyShouldn't I ?Best regards,Alex | |
| 3 | 2022-03-14 23:22 | dieterdreist | I wouldn’t necessarily, it is a tag that is often used because it renders, but specifics are scarse, and many companies are tagged with a different scheme (office=* where * is different to “company”)https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/office#valuesOnly 3000 company=* specifi... | |
| 118252141 by Knightyyyy1 @ 2022-03-08 20:44 | 1 | 2022-03-09 15:12 | surveyor54 ♦648 | Hi,die Namen, die du hier bei einigen Gebäuden einträgst, sind keine Namen. So etwas gehört eher in den Tag "operator" oder "description".Lies dir bitte den Wikibeitrag über Namen durch.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:NamesGrußsurvey... |
| 2 | 2022-03-09 16:09 | Knightyyyy1 ♦4 | Hi!Der Vorschlag kam von OSM. Wenn ich bei dem Telekom Gebaeude den 'name' Tag entferne wird er mir automatisch vorgeschlagen."Vorgeschlagene Aktualisierungen:+ name=Deutsche Telekom AG"Ideen? | |
| 3 | 2022-03-09 21:25 | dieterdreist | Zu diesem Thema wird gerade auch im deutschen Forum diskutiert:https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75088 | |
| 69512647 by Michele Aquilani @ 2019-04-24 06:01 | 1 | 2022-03-03 14:07 | dieterdreist | this is another changeset where the pieces of roundabouts have been merged thereby damaging the bus route relations. |
| 92117084 by Michele Aquilani @ 2020-10-07 13:50 | 1 | 2022-03-03 14:03 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele,purtroppo trovo tante relazioni "route" rotte perché hai unito i pezzi delle rotonde. Ti chiedo gentilmente di non farlo. |
| 91864537 by Michele Aquilani @ 2020-10-02 11:40 | 1 | 2022-03-03 13:11 | dieterdreist | Vorrei segnalare che crossing=marked solitamente si interpreta come "senza semaforo", mentre qui hai aggiunto ad un incrocio di tipo sconosciuto (highway=crossing) un crossing=marked dove c'è un semaforo (crossing=traffic_signals). Ti scrivo perché mi capita spesso di tr... |
| 116160734 by VioMaffe @ 2022-01-14 19:25 | 1 | 2022-03-02 12:14 | dieterdreist | Ciao VioMaffe,ho notato che stavi cercando un tag per corte / cortile, e sembrerebbe che alla fine hai deciso di cancellare gli inizi. In realtà c'è un tag, non molto conosciuto, ma comunque utilizzato 21mila volte, man_made=courtyardPuoi trovare la documentazione qui: https... |
| 112225536 by mascalzone67 @ 2021-10-07 16:40 | 1 | 2022-02-25 22:13 | dieterdreist | Ciao pippo67, ho notato che hai cancellato non solo il vecchio Lidl come attività ma anche tutto l'edificio compreso l'indirizzo. Non ho fatto caso quando ci sono stato la scorsa volta, non rimane niente del fabbricato? Penso l'indirizzo probabilmente sarebbe da ripristinare in... |
| 116922185 by Città di Palmi @ 2022-02-02 16:34 | 1 | 2022-02-15 22:48 | dieterdreist | mi sembra qui è stato cancellato il nome del luogo, Caserma Piave, senza sostituzione su un altro oggetto. Non conosco la situazione, ma da una breve ricerca in rete mi risulta una caserma di questo nome qui.Ciao,Martin |
| 84095873 by FvGordon @ 2020-04-25 08:46 | 1 | 2022-02-12 23:03 | dieterdreist | hi, I just noticed you deleted the school area and moved the tags to the building. I believe this is removing information, because it was already in the data that there is a school building inside a school area, but now there is only the school building and the area is gone.Cheers,Martin |
| 2 | 2022-02-13 11:05 | FvGordon ♦217 | Hi, I got the Error Message from the JOSM Validator, that there are touching Outer Roles in this Multipolygon, which I repared in this CS. When I revert my changes locally, I can see, that the School Multipolygon only includes the School building, consisting of three building parts, where I made a c... | |
| 3 | 2022-02-14 10:48 | dieterdreist | you are correct, after checking the extension of the deleted relation it did indeed not go beyond the building outline. Sorry for bothering you. I will now fix the geometry of the school.Cheers,Martin | |
| 116485021 by Toubibe @ 2022-01-23 00:42 | 1 | 2022-02-01 11:17 | dieterdreist | Hi, please try to make smaller changesets, this one spans 2 continents. I notice you deleted a building in Uetendorf, including the address (housenumber 46, which is now missing). Was it on purpose or by accident? |
| 115513285 by Martino Scaglione @ 2021-12-29 11:10 | 1 | 2022-01-14 09:27 | dieterdreist | Hi, in this changeset you have removed a lot of tags from the vatican city, namely ISO3166-1:alpha2, contry_code_fips, and all official name tags (15), and introduced a very long bilingual value in the name tag, all with the comment "fixed tags vatican city". You also changed the place lab... |
| 2 | 2022-01-14 09:37 | dieterdreist | forgot it, please also explain the deletion of the ordine di Sant'Agostino: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8709827024/history | |
| 3 | 2022-01-14 09:41 | dieterdreist | After looking deeper into this edit I can see that removing country information from the place=city/town makes sense. I am unsure about the bilingual name, but would think this should be discussed with the Italian community. The classification change from town to city has so much impact that I rever... | |
| 4 | 2022-01-14 11:32 | Martino Scaglione ♦67 | I changed name to including the latin and italian name because this nation has these languages as official languages, as it is customary in nations or territories with more than one official language.I deleted the city_block because it didn't make sense, as there is already this relation http... | |
| 5 | 2022-01-14 13:55 | dieterdreist | agostini:the issue I see with the Agostini is that you did not delete place=city_block, you deleted the whole object with all translations and the wikidata link and wp link (which both are about the Augustine Order and not about this facility, agreed, but could have been retagged to wikidata:opera... | |
| 6 | 2022-01-14 15:05 | Martino Scaglione ♦67 | It can be tagged as a neighbourhood (?) | |
| 7 | 2022-01-14 15:29 | dieterdreist | if we decide to remove any of city/town/village it could get place=suburb IMHO, while it is very small by inhabitants, it is very important on a global scale, and I guess it is also important regarding for example economical indicators like the GDP (compared to other suburbs). It used to be a place=... | |
| 8 | 2022-01-14 21:36 | Martino Scaglione ♦67 | I would opt for suburb. | |
| 9 | 2022-01-15 15:36 | dieterdreist | I am tending towards place=country, or is there already another node with the tag? | |
| 10 | 2022-01-15 15:38 | dieterdreist | regarding the double naming, it is an exceptional case here as well, because Latin is the official language but it is a dead language, no mother tongues here. I’m unsure and would discuss it on the tagging mailing list. | |
| 11 | 2022-01-15 16:59 | Martino Scaglione ♦67 | But this is not an argument since previously the name was latin only. I added italian because also italian is official language there. | |
| 12 | 2022-01-16 00:12 | dieterdreist | Have a look: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/424311883before your edit, the name of this node was Italian only, since 2016-08. Before this, it was Latin since 2013, before it was Italian. | |
| 13 | 2022-01-16 11:26 | Martino Scaglione ♦67 | I was talking about the relation. If there was a language on the node and another on the relation is worse. I fixed these inconsistencies, you say that the node had a history of changing back and forth between latin and italian, if we have both there is no longer reason to change the name. | |
| 14 | 2022-01-17 08:31 | dieterdreist | I did not say "changing back and forth", it only changed a few times in 13 years. Of ~90 edits, the node name was changed 3-4 times as was the relation name. Looking at the relation 36989, it started with an English name in 2008, which became Italian in 2009 and latin in 2010, then again I... | |
| 15 | 2022-02-05 17:53 | Jojo4u ♦265 | Hi, coincidentally I noticed that Vatican City ist the only country in the world which has place=country not as a node but on the border relation. I'd like to have it on a node in order to have a consistent use worldwide. Country nodes are a bit of legacy tagging, but they are still here (advan... | |
| 16 | 2022-02-05 18:08 | Jojo4u ♦265 | Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117055531Place=country https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9481710122Place=suburb https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/424311883Removed place=country from border relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/36989. | |
| 29373137 by AndiG88 @ 2015-03-09 22:24 | 1 | 2022-01-17 08:20 | dieterdreist | Hi, I noticed that you added landuse=religious to a whole country. Can you explain why? Is a museum "religious" landuse? A bank, a supermarket or a post office? A park? A police station? The administration of a portfolio worth billions of dollars? Should we also add landuse=religious to al... |
| 116160360 by VioMaffe @ 2022-01-14 19:13 | 1 | 2022-01-15 23:44 | dieterdreist | Ciao VioMaffe, ieri hai cancellato il museo delle memorie a Corviale, perché? |
| 116075374 by stefano trinca @ 2022-01-12 17:15 | 1 | 2022-01-14 15:03 | dieterdreist | Ciao Stefano Trinca, ho notato che hai riclassificato il Parco Naturale Regionale Appia Antica da nature reserve (riserva naturale) a park (parco urbano). Per come noi interpretiamo il tag "park", il parco dell'appia antica non può essere considerato un leisure=park, perch&eacu... |
| 81866509 by Davide Ser @ 2020-03-06 11:59 | 1 | 2022-01-13 11:27 | dieterdreist | Ciao Davide Ser, ho notato che al Lotto57 ci sono tag per indicare l'indirizzo Via Caffaro 24. Vorrei chiederti se fosse giusto, intendo se questo è l'unico ingresso a tutto il lotto, altrimenti dovrebbe essere spostato il civico su un nodo alla sua posizione.Grazie,Martin |
| 2 | 2022-01-14 10:21 | Davide Ser ♦1 | Ciao Martin, ci sono due ingressi al Lotto 57: il principale su via Caffaro (via Caffaro 24) e il secondario, senza numero civico, su via Gerolamo Adorno (c'è una scala che porta al cortile). | |
| 3 | 2022-01-14 14:04 | dieterdreist | Grazie Davide per la risposta, stavo per mappare nohousenumber=yes all'ingresso di Via Adorno, ma secondo dei fonti non utilizzabili, il civico è 60 e la targa c'è. Ho aggiornato la mappa con i tuoi commenti, grazie ancora, Martin | |
| 107645659 by FraMauro @ 2021-07-08 15:14 | 1 | 2022-01-11 13:41 | dieterdreist | Ciao FraMauro, per qualche svista (credo) hai aggiunto dei tag address sulla strada way 124087393. L'ho trovato con il nuovo tool https://nominatim.org/qa/un saluto,Martin |
| 77905000 by emblenj @ 2019-12-04 01:34 | 1 | 2022-01-10 11:32 | dieterdreist | Hi, I just wanted to let you know in this changeset you somehow ended up with a broken multipolygon relation (only inner ways). Maybe this is an iD-editor bug?Relation 106272 |
| 83077007 by lonvia @ 2020-04-04 16:58 | 1 | 2022-01-06 14:07 | dieterdreist | Hallo Lonvia, wieso hast du die lokalisierten Namen entfernt? Und ist eine Gebietsreform wirklich das einzig relevante für einen place=town node, betrifft die nicht vor allem die Verwaltung und weniger die Identität, zumindest mittelfristig? |
| 2 | 2022-01-06 14:54 | lonvia ♦37 | Weil das Ding entweder Dessau-Roßlau heisst oder Dessau. Beides geht nicht. Ich habe das ganze halt in eine Richtung gefixt und vermutlich war der Gedanke, das das Rendering bleibt wie es war. Aber das ist jetzt zwei Jahre her. Vielleicht würde ich das heute anders machen, aber das wä... | |
| 3 | 2022-01-07 00:24 | dieterdreist | Ich glaube Dessau-Roßlau ist für die admin Relation genau richtig, aber die Stadt heißt immer noch Dessau. Im Rathaus von Dessau sitzt jetzt die Stadtverwaltung von Dessau-Roßlau. Das Bauhaus Dessau ist immer noch das Bauhaus Dessau, Dessau Hauptbahnhof, etc.Zu dem node 24... | |
| 4 | 2022-01-07 00:29 | dieterdreist | die Wikipedia und Wikidata Artikel muss man nicht ändern, der Anspruch dass das 1:1 passt lässt sich oft nicht erfüllen weil die WP Artikel mehrere Aspekte in einem Artikel behandeln, und Wikidata im wesentlichen 1:1 zu den Artikeln Objekte hat, also auch mischt. | |
| 5 | 2022-01-07 08:19 | lonvia ♦37 | Doch, Wikipedia/Wikidata anzupassen ist wichtig hier. Es gibt nämlich getrennte Artikel für beide. Aber auch im allgemeinen Fall gilt: wikipedia sollte einen Artikel über das Objekt referenzieren. Eine Erwähnung im Artikel reicht nicht. Man muss nicht um jeden Preis ein Wikidata/... | |
| 6 | 2022-01-09 21:51 | dieterdreist | ich glaube ich stand auf dem Schlauch, mit "Wikipedia/Wikidata-Einträge [angepassen]" war gemeint, die osm tags für WP und WD auf andere Entitäten zeigen zu lassen, nicht die Inhalte bei WP und WD zu ändern. Das kann man natürlich gerne machen, wenn ein anderer Art... | |
| 115652105 by ian727 @ 2022-01-01 21:38 | 1 | 2022-01-05 15:34 | streckenkundler ♦1,042 | Toll... du hat hier viele völlig unnötige MP-Monster geschaffen... :(Das bearbeitet so nie wieder jemand an... Bitte versuche MP's nur da einzusetzen, wo es geometrisch zwingend nötig ist... Das hilft allem...EN: Great... you have created many completely unnecessary MP mo... |
| 2 | 2022-01-05 15:39 | ian727 ♦21 | Da scheiden sich wohl die Geister. Als ich vor ein par Jahren noch ohne MPs gemappt habe, kamen gleich die Nachrichten à la: "Uahh, bitte überschneidende Linien unbedingt vermeiden, MPs benutzen!". Jetzt nutze ich MPs und mache es natürlich wieder nicht allen recht. Was w&... | |
| 3 | 2022-01-05 16:27 | streckenkundler ♦1,042 | MP's sollten wirdklich nur dann eingesetzt werden, wenn es geometrisch nötig ist (Wiese im Wald). Ich versuche ganz streng MP's mit die mehrere Outer haben zu vermeiden. Solche sollten nur eingesetzt werden, wenn es annähernd oder mehr als 2000 Stützpunkte sind. Eine Linie, ... | |
| 4 | 2022-01-05 16:33 | ian727 ♦21 | Danke für die ausführliche Antwort. Ich schreibe dir ggf. nochmal eine PM mit weiteren Fragen, weil ich mir jetzt nicht mehr ganz sicher bin, wie ich bestimmte "areas" dann mappen soll. Schonmal als Vorwarnung: Wenn du MPs nicht magst, wirst du bei meinen anderen Edits erst recht... | |
| 5 | 2022-01-06 23:34 | dieterdreist | Monster sehe ich hier keine, und auch nicht die Gefahr dass sie zu welchen werden. Ich stimme Ian727 zu, da scheiden sich wohl die Geister. Wenn es nur ganz einfache Polygone mit wenigen Punkten sind (wie hier die neuen MP) könnte man schon überlegen ob gestapelte Polygone nicht einfacher ... | |
| 6 | 2022-01-06 23:38 | dieterdreist | Multipolygone erst einzusetzen ab 2000 Nodes bedeutet andersrum betrachtet ja, dass man erstmal die Fläche an 2000 Stellen mit anderen Flächen verknüpft hat und das jedesmal wieder auftrennen muss wenn man was ändert. Ich würde die Grenze eher bei 5-10 nodes sehen | |
| 115767037 by highflyer74 @ 2022-01-04 18:45 | 1 | 2022-01-04 20:11 | Inghuimischar ♦2 | Servus,bei allem Aktionismus nicht vergessen: "Mir erscheint es wichtig, daß man beim Mappen ein wenig die Augen aufhält..." Zwei Adressen zwei juristische Personen, zwei USTID: TANDLER Zahnrad- und Getriebefabrik GmbH & Co. KGKornstraße 297-301, 28201 Brem... |
| 2 | 2022-01-04 20:27 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | Hi und danke für Deine Rückmeldung! Mit Aktionismus hatte das nicht viel gemein. Dass dort mehrere juristische Personen residieren war mir aber in der Tat entgangen. Der von Dir gemappte Node unterschied sich lediglich in der Telefonnummer vom schon existierenden. Da das Gelände auf d... | |
| 3 | 2022-01-05 10:00 | dieterdreist | siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74585 | |
| 4 | 2022-01-05 10:34 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | @dieterdreist: danke für den Hinweis. Da Inghuimischar anscheinend nicht diskussionsfreudig, sondern beleidigt ist, baue ich das hier zurück. Das Ganze ist im Zuge meiner täglichen Mappingaktivitäten in Bremen entstanden und tatsächlich kein Grund zur Aufregung. Entspannten ... | |
| 32269846 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2015-06-28 19:28 | 1 | 2022-01-02 10:31 | dieterdreist | hi, you added building=residential to these landuse polygons, but they really aren't a building, there are tens of buildings inside these polygons... |
| 2 | 2022-01-02 18:04 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,666 | Typically it is acceptable as the initial step when mapping - though it depends on area, may change over time especially as quality of aerial imagery is getting better.Feel free to delete them if nowadays in Rome this kind of mapping is unwelcome.Or add fixme tags(note when this edit was... | |
| 3 | 2022-01-03 01:02 | dieterdreist | Thank you for replying. I don’t have the time currently to trace this area, so I have put some fixme tags, thing is that people will be less likely mapping the buildings if there is something there, and it leads to problems like this (which I probably should have fixed) https://www.openstreetm... | |
| 672888 by francesco_pe @ 2008-11-03 22:59 | 1 | 2022-01-02 10:51 | dieterdreist | Ciao Francesco,mi rendo conto, sono passati 13 anni ;-)Ti vorrei comunque segnalare che access=no per le strade riservato agli autobus non è giusto in questo caso (come quasi mai lo è), esempio way 22716413, perché la strada è accessibile ai pedoni (sul marciapiede). ... |
| 75628305 by LoreMazza91 @ 2019-10-13 16:15 | 1 | 2022-01-02 10:34 | dieterdreist | Hi, I saw that you added the value crossing=uncontrolled;zebra to some pedestrian crossings. Can you explain what this is intended to mean? |
| 2 | 2022-01-02 10:36 | dieterdreist | even weirder: crossing=zebra;traffic_signals.This variant is definitely against the documented usage of the crossing tag. | |
| 81634972 by Cristian Torcinaro @ 2020-03-01 04:00 | 1 | 2021-12-31 11:12 | dieterdreist | Hi, you have changed the name of Frigidarium to Frigidarium-gelateria, this is a description but not the name.I have fixed it now.Cheers,Martin |
| 81079835 by francians @ 2020-02-16 19:25 | 1 | 2021-12-29 11:23 | dieterdreist | Hi, you're right, there was a typo in the VATIN, but why didn't you fix it, rather than deleting it wholesale? |
| 2 | 2021-12-29 18:01 | francians ♦222 | Ciao Martin,Non l'avrò trovata... Meglio non lasciare info errate IMHO.Francesco | |
| 51994221 by Michele Aquilani @ 2017-09-13 06:46 | 1 | 2021-12-26 23:41 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele, ho visto che qui hai cambiato il ref=GRA in ref=A90 (c’è già un official_ref=A90) ma nella realtà si trova GRA sui segni e tutti dicono GRA. Con la tua modifica GRA non si trova più, ma per me sarebbe da avere da qualche parte, perché utile e re... |
| 115022918 by JeroenvanderGun @ 2021-12-16 19:52 | 1 | 2021-12-17 12:15 | aixbrick ♦840 | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1012869847 is not part of the bus routes (line 54) and if you split a roundabout (at "Eurode Business Center") with bus lines running through, only those ways should be part of the route which the bus uses.But what makes me wonder is: You splitte... |
| 2 | 2021-12-17 20:20 | JeroenvanderGun ♦182 | I think I made a mistake in JOSM that broke the relations. I probably edited the ways without fully downloading their relations first.I see someone else already fixed the route relations: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115063692 | |
| 3 | 2021-12-17 22:10 | aixbrick ♦840 | That could be an explanation. Thanks for your answer and to Leo Slager for the correction :-). | |
| 4 | 2021-12-18 15:55 | dieterdreist | it should work despite not the whole route relation being downloaded, it doesn’t matter, when a way is split that is part of a route, all parts must still be part of the relations, maybe you told Josm not to keep the part? | |
| 114958488 by AlCeRoma @ 2021-12-15 10:42 | 1 | 2021-12-15 11:22 | dieterdreist | Ciao, ho per caso notato che hai messo il way 130182466 come "natural=grassland", cosa mi sembra molto sospetto (al meno), perché ci sono stato e si tratta di campi di agricoltura, eventualmente o parzialmente abbandonati, eventualmente usati per produzione di fieno, ma in nessun mo... |
| 2 | 2021-12-15 11:29 | AlCeRoma ♦9 | No, gran parte di quell'area non è coltivata, è lasciata così ad erba. Abito a poca distanza dal luogo e mi capita spesso di passarci, credo di conoscere sufficientemente la zona. Se quell'area era in passato coltivata non posso saperlo. Preciso che l'area era sta... | |
| 3 | 2021-12-15 11:38 | dieterdreist | sì, potrebbero essere in disuso, ma sono comunque campi o prati (meadow), soprattutto se viene raccolto. C’erano molte più geometrie che descrivenano piccole aree, ad esempio natural=scrub dove è più denso. Ora sono al cellulare ma ti scrivo a breve più in de... | |
| 4 | 2021-12-15 11:46 | AlCeRoma ♦9 | Può darsi che ci siano dei tag più precisi per descrivere in maniera dettagliata la zona. Con iD editor effettivamente si è un po' condizionati nella scelta. Buona giornata. | |
| 5 | 2021-12-15 15:01 | dieterdreist | guardando ancora sulle ortofoto si vede bene che queste aree sono tutte o maggiormente (tranne delle zone piccole tra le aree) mantenute, forse landuse=meadow potrebbe essere appropriato (farei singole aree, ci sono anche recinzioni, la suddivisione sulle ortofoto è evidente). Una parte &egra... | |
| 114264529 by fedc @ 2021-11-26 13:44 | 1 | 2021-11-30 09:21 | dieterdreist | Ciao Fedc, le "light_rail" sono ferrovie "normali", in questo caso, considerando la frequenza delle fermate e i mezzi utilizzati esempio http://www.ferroviaromanord.altervista.org/DSCN0335.jpghttps://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BMb5bkjzapw/Xlww3VKMEfI/AAAAAAAA2VM/n5cqAfENmNUIpCUunl8nPUQ... |
| 2 | 2021-12-10 15:33 | dieterdreist | Non avendo più avuto riscontro procedo come spiegato e la metto a light rail. Ciao,Martin | |
| 104919640 by JeroenvanderGun @ 2021-05-19 01:04 | 1 | 2021-12-06 12:19 | dieterdreist | Hi, I just noticed you have created a relation for the "Eurozone". Maybe I am misgiuded, but from my understanding, this could be automatically computed by evaluating the low profile "currency" tags and combining them with the official boundaries of the European Union? The result... |
| 2 | 2021-12-06 20:15 | JeroenvanderGun ♦182 | This relation has only 19 members so it's not heavy-weight. (This is not a type=boundary relation.) It's also useful to have this relation because it attaches a name and metadata to the query, e.g. making it retrievable by search.That said, you indirectly do raise a valid question rega... | |
| 3 | 2021-12-06 21:51 | dieterdreist | Hi Jeroen, thank you for your reply. The “weight” of the relation is not its immediate complexity (I agree, 19 members are easy to overlook, and it won’t produce many versions because they are all relations). But if you look at a typical operation with OpenStreetMap data like geogr... | |
| 4 | 2021-12-06 22:24 | JeroenvanderGun ♦182 | As far as I understand, nesting relations inside larger relations is common mapping practice: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Super-relationFor example, this relation indirectly contains the entire main road network of Europe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7884303Surely any data... | |
| 5 | 2021-12-06 22:50 | dieterdreist | indeed, those network relations like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7884303 or those “collecting” public transport routes are also questionable.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories | |
| 6 | 2021-12-06 22:51 | dieterdreist | it’s not about crashing computers, it’s about additional processing for redundant data. | |
| 65296381 by procuste @ 2018-12-08 16:51 | 1 | 2021-12-01 15:50 | dieterdreist | Ciao Procuste,ho notato che hai inserito intorno all'Auditorio 5 giardini tutti con il nome "Giardino Claudio Abbado". Possibile che nella realtà si tratta dello stesso giardino?Ciao,Martin |
| 2 | 2021-12-04 15:57 | procuste ♦13 | Buon pomeriggio, Martinsì, dovrebbe essere l'intero giardino intorno all'auditorium ad avere quel nome. Sinceramente non ricordo perché avessi optato per replicare il nome in ogni pezzetto di giardino, probabilmente non ero riuscito a creare un multipolygon o c'era sta... | |
| 3 | 2021-12-05 10:59 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno Procuste,grazie per la risposta, allora lo modifico che risulta come un giardino unico.Ciao,Martin | |
| 75592071 by GBAB @ 2019-10-12 05:19 | 1 | 2021-11-26 12:35 | dieterdreist | You have added historic=city_gate to the Arco di Giano, which seems completely off. Can you explain which are your sources?Cheers,Martin |
| 2 | 2021-11-26 12:41 | dieterdreist | You have also declared the Arco degli Argentari as a city gate which is equally wrong (or I am interested in learning about the reasoning, but in any case, a city gate requires a city wall in the first place, no?) | |
| 3 | 2021-11-26 13:16 | GBAB ♦101 | Though they are indeed no city gates in a literally sense, however, since I don't know any OSM tags for triuph arches (and, actually, there cannot be separate tags for each type of object) it seems a good idea to be a bit abstract and add a tag similar to it. | |
| 4 | 2021-11-26 17:03 | dieterdreist | Actually the arch of Janus is not even a triumph arch, current hypothesis is it is just a covered crossroad. There are many triumph archs already tagged in OpenStreetMap, I think something like historic=monument would fit well, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23590989a city gate is not ... | |
| 5 | 2021-11-27 16:17 | GBAB ♦101 | Dear Martin,(könnte man Dir eigentlich nicht auf Deutsch schreiben? Mir wäre es bequemer.)I may agree that a city gate is something specific and not the best tagging option. Let's discuss it.However, I strongly disagree that they would be monuments. Monuments are a very sp... | |
| 6 | 2021-11-28 12:10 | dieterdreist | Hallo Gábor, wir können gerne auch auf deutsch weiterdiskutieren. Ja, man muss aufpassen bei historic=monument, weil das (gerade in Italien mit dem falschen Freund "monumento") öfters verwechselt wird, aber bei Triumphbögen halte ich historic=monument für absolut... | |
| 7 | 2021-11-30 10:32 | GBAB ♦101 | Hallo Martin,ehrlich gesagt bin ich nicht so tief in die feinen Details eingegangen…Ob ein historisches Ereignis groß genug ist, einen Objekt als 'monument' zu bezeichnen, ist eine Interpretationsfrage. Die verschiedenen Schlachte der Römer scheinen für mich ... | |
| 8 | 2021-11-30 12:20 | dieterdreist | Dann lassen wir den Janusbogen erstmal, barrier ist er sicherlich nicht und nie gewesen, eher das Gegenteil, man kann von allen vier Seiten eintreten, eine Tür oder so gibt es nicht (eben eine Kreuzung und wohl auch Unterstand bei Regengüssen für den nahen Viehmarkt, jedenfalls ist da... | |
| 66895625 by GBAB @ 2019-02-04 08:07 | 1 | 2021-11-27 01:18 | dieterdreist | any reason why you did not consider these as work of public art? I believe the tags that have been removed were valid tags... |
| 2 | 2021-11-27 16:09 | GBAB ♦101 | According to OSM wiki, the difference between a tourism=artwork and a historic=memorial + memorial statue is whether they represent a named figure or not.For example if there is a statue of a bird or ship or even of an unnamed girl on a street, that is a tourism=artwork. If there is a statue of ... | |
| 3 | 2021-11-28 12:22 | dieterdreist | Hallo Gàbor,ich antworte auch hier auf deutsch wie in unserer parallelen Diskussion zum Arco di Giano besprochen (zu historic=monument siehe dort, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75592071 )Hinsichtlich tourism=artwork in Abgrenzung zu historic=memorial war mir nicht klar, dass es ... | |
| 4 | 2021-11-30 10:34 | GBAB ♦101 | Hallo Martin,ich habe die Abgrenzung an den deutschen Wiki-Seiten gefunden:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:artwork_type%3Dstatue„Für eine Statue, die eine historische Person darstellt und gedenkt, benutze historic=memorial + memorial=statue.”Und https://wiki... | |
| 5 | 2021-11-30 11:51 | dieterdreist | Danke für die Rückmeldung, habe jetzt gesehen dass es im englischen auch so steht (beides von Geozeisig in 2018 eingebracht). Ich habe dazu jetzt mal im deutschen Forum einen Thread aufgemacht: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=848263Gruß,Martin | |
| 75422637 by TWHB @ 2019-10-08 16:19 | 1 | 2021-11-27 02:18 | dieterdreist | more parts added together that do not belong together anymore. |
| 2 | 2021-11-27 02:20 | dieterdreist | you even added porta Salaria, a city gate that was turn down 100 years ago, as barrier=sally_portReally I remain speechless how a mapper with 2000 edits can make such edits. | |
| 90131821 by Frugol @ 2020-08-29 22:04 | 1 | 2021-11-26 22:22 | dieterdreist | Ciao ludofru,ho notato che spesso stai cancellando parti per poi ridisegnarli, e generalmente sono anche d'accordo che quelle situazioni meritavano un intervento. Il problema con il cancellare e ricreare è che rende molto difficile leggere lo storico, in realtà sembra interrotto... |
| 49478268 by iLaw @ 2017-06-12 18:54 | 1 | 2021-11-26 20:55 | dieterdreist | hi iLaw, the acquario isn’t actually an tourism=aquarium as it is used by the architectural association and not to show fish. I removed the tag.Cheers Martin |
| 75422093 by TWHB @ 2019-10-08 16:02 | 1 | 2021-11-26 12:46 | dieterdreist | Barrier=sally_port for porta Flaminia seems completely off, you can walk through the city gate any time, it is no barrier at all. |
| 2 | 2021-11-26 12:52 | dieterdreist | You have combined the remaining fragments of the city walls "to form one long one", but they aren't combined, these are all fragments which have been disconnected by cutting through with roads. I am sorry that I have discovered this so late, I will revert this changeset now, thereby r... | |
| 55823414 by iLaw @ 2018-01-28 08:47 | 1 | 2021-11-26 11:47 | dieterdreist | Ciao iLaw,in questo changeset hai aggiunto "place=square" ad un centro di una rotatoria. Non ha senso il tag "place=square" quando non vi è abbinato un nome (name=*), perché questo tag viene utilizzato per indicare una piazza, un piazzale, un largo, e simili. ... |
| 54399607 by Bec DP @ 2017-12-06 12:31 | 1 | 2021-11-26 10:47 | dieterdreist | in this changeset the Obelisco Matteiano was relocated from its position to a place where it is not.Probably no intentional vandalism because review was requested and user has very few editshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/260770350/history#map=19/41.88577/12.50161 |
| 2 | 2021-11-26 11:30 | dieterdreist | The other modifications are retagging from leisure=garden to park, this is probably rooted in a misunderstanding of the meaning of the word "garden" in the context of OpenStreetMap, still, not useful. | |
| 55244875 by Bec DP @ 2018-01-07 19:53 | 1 | 2021-11-26 10:58 | dieterdreist | Hai messo un parco sopra un parco, senza ulteriori attributi come "nome" ecc., quindi purtroppo ho dovuto rimuovere il duplicato grezzo.Ti chiederei gentilmente prima di caricare modifiche di verificarne il senso, avere lo stesso identico oggetto (Parco) mappato due volte per noi è... |
| 112322479 by Eric Bie @ 2021-10-10 07:14 | 1 | 2021-11-26 08:52 | dieterdreist | Hello,I have just noticed that you added building=apartments to the Biblioteca della Pontificia Università della Santa Croce in Rome.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525109737/historyDo you recall how you came to this conclusion? Cheers,Martin |
| 2 | 2021-11-26 08:56 | dieterdreist | Another question, I also saw that you tagged Haus Sommer at Pariser Platz in Berlin as "apartments". This seems rather strange to me, as "it" once was a bank, then the building got destroyed and after the reunification it was rebuilt, and the reconstruction is still housing a ban... | |
| 3 | 2021-11-26 09:00 | dieterdreist | And the French Consulate in NYC seems to have been a hotel before: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266894764 | |
| 90401885 by marceg16579 @ 2020-09-04 08:10 | 1 | 2021-11-21 00:19 | dieterdreist | Salve, ho notato che hai cambiato il percorso https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488627565 da footway in pedestrian. Da anni noto che ci sono mappatori a Venezia che eliminano qualsiasi differenziazzione dei percorsi, taggando tutto come pedestrian. Vi chiedo di non farlo, questo percorso come tanti ... |
| 2 | 2021-11-21 00:21 | dieterdreist | Tra altro ne abbiamo già parlato tre anni fa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50453873 | |
| 91927638 by Michele Aquilani @ 2020-10-04 10:34 | 1 | 2021-11-19 15:58 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele, ho notato che in questo changeset è stato cambiato crossing=traffic_signals in crossing=marked qui: node 304150466. Penso sia una riduzione dell'informazione, perché "marked" può essere qualsiasi segno. Suggerisco di utilizzare "crossing=zebra&q... |
| 113887247 by cris67 @ 2021-11-17 09:08 | 1 | 2021-11-18 13:28 | dieterdreist | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed you have marked the whole of Villa Ada as building :)No worries, I have already fixed it, but please be careful when uploading and check the modifications that are shown for something unusual before confirming.Thank you,Cheers Martin |
| 47585791 by Heinz_V @ 2017-04-09 07:18 | 1 | 2021-11-17 13:26 | dieterdreist | Hi, I saw that you removed area=yes from this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27591708/historyYou should not remove area=yes tags when it isn’t clear from other tags that a closed way is meant to represent an area. Thank you. |
| 99153744 by user_5359 @ 2021-02-12 06:59 | 1 | 2021-11-16 23:18 | dieterdreist | Hi, I have just noted that you removed the courtyard name with the comment "correct wikipedia notation" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27591708/ |
| 2 | 2021-11-17 03:36 | user_5359 ♦19,415 | Hi, the main reason why I became aware of this church was quite correctly noted in the change set comment.I have deleted without the additional tag "man_made=courtyard" senseless name in the process, because I probably did not assign the correct priority (have interpreted version 3 as the ... | |
| 3 | 2021-11-17 13:23 | dieterdreist | Understood. I would not see the name without a typological tag as “senseless”, but rather as incomplete and waiting for someone to amend it. As long as it isn’t wrong we should keep information, even if it is still incomplete or will be filtered out by most current data consumers b... | |
| 70952368 by wheelmap_visitor @ 2019-06-05 11:46 | 1 | 2021-11-16 10:47 | dieterdreist | Hi, I just saw you added wheelchair=no to the main basilica of Rome, San Giovanni in Laterano. I have not been there recently, but I cannot believe that this is true. While not all entrances may be accessible due to stairs, there are 2 main entrances, and I believe at least one is accessible.Anoth... |
| 75919797 by GBAB @ 2019-10-19 05:19 | 1 | 2021-11-16 10:12 | dieterdreist | Hi, I just saw you added leisure=garden for a completely paved inner court of an administrative building (Chiostro di San Giovanni in Laterano). I am reverting this to highway=pedestrian area=yes. |
| 2 | 2021-11-16 14:09 | GBAB ♦101 | Hello, thank you, you're completely right. I probably confused it with the southern cloistre (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27591708). | |
| 99062018 by skylineaq @ 2021-02-10 19:58 | 1 | 2021-11-15 10:39 | dieterdreist | Ciao skylineaq, in questo changeset hai aggiunto dei tags a Corte dei Conti che in parte avevano senso (attributi che descrivono l'oggetto), ma che hanno duplicato anche il tag "building" che si trova già sui singoli pezzi (La corte dei Conti è composta di più edi... |
| 112937663 by AlCeRoma @ 2021-10-25 09:30 | 1 | 2021-11-09 12:12 | dieterdreist | Ciao AlCeRoma, ho notato che hai modificato alcuni punti highway=crossing, crossing=traffic_signals in crossing=marked. Non lo fare, in quanto non solo si perdono le informazioni sul incrocio (con semaforo o no, strisce zebra o altro), ma spesso crossing=marked viene interpretato di essere un incroc... |
| 2 | 2021-11-09 17:40 | AlCeRoma ♦9 | Ho modificato così perché pensavo che il valore traffic_signals non fosse valido. Poi mi è venuto il dubbio che stessi sbagliando, quindi ho consultato la wiki e ho capito che gli attraversamenti pedonali con semaforo vanno taggati usando quel valore.Grazie comunque,Alessio | |
| 104463938 by Città di Palmi @ 2021-05-10 16:20 | 1 | 2021-11-05 12:40 | dieterdreist | Ciao Città di Palmi, ti vorrei chiedere un favore, potresti disegnare i landuse=residential sul suole che effetivamente viene utilizzato così? Attualmente stai continuando a connettere il landuse con il centro della strada, cosa porta a tanti errori di seguito (cose connesse malame... |
| 52873665 by IraSergeeva @ 2017-10-12 22:47 | 1 | 2017-11-18 22:24 | dieterdreist | Hi, why do you think Roma Ostiense is light rail? |
| 2 | 2017-12-08 01:20 | dieterdreist | or Roma Termini? I believe this is an automated edit, there is no factual background. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-08 16:35 | dieterdreist | Can you please explain, what your sources are? | |
| 4 | 2017-12-08 17:54 | dieterdreist | Roma Tiburtina, Orte, ... I'm fixing the problems as I find them, many main stations which are part of the highspeed network have been downgraded to light rail stations in this changeset. No answer so far... | |
| 5 | 2021-11-05 11:07 | dieterdreist | Hi, me again. You can explain why you have added the "station"s on Roma-Albano as "light_rail" while the railway value is "rail" and the route relations "train"? | |
| 107102883 by andywar65 @ 2021-06-28 17:44 | 1 | 2021-10-29 08:30 | dieterdreist | it seems you have added the Deutsche Schule as residential building? |
| 2 | 2021-11-03 14:12 | andywar65 ♦1 | Obviously it was a mistake. Thanks for fixing | |
| 3 | 2021-11-03 22:55 | dieterdreist | you’re welcome :) | |
| 75431193 by TWHB @ 2019-10-08 21:13 | 1 | 2021-10-20 10:37 | dieterdreist | Hi, I just noticed at Piazzale Ostiense you have removed almost all the tags from the way of the city gate Porta Ostiense and have moved it to a node. Can you explain why? To me it seems, a polygon is a better representation for something as large as this historic city gate. Cheers,Martin |
| 2 | 2021-10-20 10:41 | dieterdreist | Just saw that you also changed building=city_gate to building=yes. Please do not do it, building=yes is clearly worse than building=foo, as the mere presence of the building key already implies "yes" unless the value is "no". | |
| 3 | 2021-10-20 12:29 | TWHB ♦11 | Hi, I did this because the building itself is a museum (see https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museo_della_Via_Ostiense). In this way the city gate is shown on the city wall itself and the museum is shown on the building.Greetings,Tijn | |
| 4 | 2021-10-20 19:23 | dieterdreist | But the whole building is also a city gate (actually, only a part is museum). The city walls aren’t a just line, arguably the whole gate building is a part of the city walls, in the long run they’ll become polygons as well (because you can walk inside the walls, it is appropriate to have... | |
| 37330827 by gnastyle @ 2016-02-20 15:51 | 1 | 2021-10-04 07:19 | dieterdreist | non tutti gli edifici sono appartamenti, ad esempio la sede ACI è un ufficio |
| 111921808 by FAMx9 @ 2021-09-30 14:56 | 1 | 2021-10-01 21:49 | dieterdreist | se ora è un cantiere sarebbe da mettere il tag landuse=construction alla way di contorno |
| 110683275 by Rinzxc @ 2021-09-03 15:08 | 1 | 2021-09-27 16:00 | dieterdreist | Ciao Rinzxc, ho notato che hai aggiunto il tag "amenity=place_of_worship" (luogo di culto) al cimitero acattolico di Roma. Il cimitero non è in tutto un luogo di culto, al meno non lo è nel senso del tag place of worship. Ho rimosso il tag.Saluti e buona mappatura,Marti... |
| 2 | 2021-09-27 16:04 | dieterdreist | hai anche aggiunto "building=yes" sull'area dell'intero cimitero e rimosso il tag "landuse=cemetery" che significa cimitero. Puoi vedere le tue modifiche qui (ad esempio): https://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=110683275 | |
| 86352307 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-06-08 11:34 | 1 | 2021-09-27 15:36 | dieterdreist | in this changeset there is retagging from farmland to meadow, but from the aerial imagery this is clearly not a meadow, at least most of it. |
| 91554283 by Michele Aquilani @ 2020-09-26 14:50 | 1 | 2021-09-27 15:09 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele, ho notato che hai cambiato il tagging di crossing=traffic_signals in crossing=marked qui:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1986911259Lo ritengo un errore, perché traffic_signals è molto più specifico che marked (marked non lo consiglio per nessun caso, perch&e... |
| 37928659 by xybot @ 2016-03-18 21:45 | 1 | 2016-03-20 06:50 | Omegatherion ♦132 | Hallo, in diesem CS wurden diverse Namen von Bushaltestellen und Stromverteilern geändert, bei denen richtigerweise "Str." eingetragen war. Bitte ändere das.Zudem wurden Nodes editiert, die so seit 2014 bestehen. Hat der Bot neue Regeln bekommen oder lief der seit Jahren nich... |
| 2 | 2021-08-25 06:54 | dieterdreist | ebenfalls aktuell im Forum diskutiert: der Name “?” wurde kaputtrepariert. | |
| 3 | 2021-08-25 06:55 | dieterdreist | Bezug: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73646 | |
| 108515557 by mcheck @ 2021-07-23 22:49 Active block | 1 | 2021-08-11 12:59 | dieterdreist | Ciao,abbiamo parlato di queste modifiche in mailing list perché non abbiamo visto questo edificio in nessuna foto aerea:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966862215Mi potresti spiegare come hai reperito la geometria?Grazie,Martin |
| 106164616 by maramutze2018 @ 2021-06-10 15:27 | 1 | 2021-08-02 14:52 | dieterdreist | Zu einer dieser Änderungen wird gerade hier diskutiert: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73446 |
| 107708455 by MatthieuLyon69 @ 2021-07-09 13:54 | 1 | 2021-07-30 16:41 | dieterdreist | Hi, I have noticed you downgraded this unclassified road to track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/957977292#map=13/13.5974/4.2020&layers=NFrom looking at the map it seems to be the main connection locally, for me this is at least unclassified. |
| 56920260 by rusefkuma @ 2018-03-06 01:44 Active block | 1 | 2021-06-22 15:04 | dieterdreist | hi, I just noticed you changed the classification of Via Odescalchi from unclassified to residential, can you explain your reasoning? I would have rather made it tertiary than downgrading it, for me it’s a minor arterial road |
| 106682805 by Martino Scaglione @ 2021-06-20 22:40 | 1 | 2021-06-21 15:43 | dieterdreist | avere gli stessi valori in name e alt_name mi sembra un errore… |
| 2 | 2021-06-21 17:16 | dieterdreist | also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94016817 | |
| 95965478 by wurzelast @ 2020-12-16 22:06 | 1 | 2021-06-03 19:36 | Stefan@MUC ♦9 | Was ist an der Description und Note von Jonathan Grundmann in Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367800762/ falsch? Ich bitte um Wiederherstellung der ursprünglichen Inhalte. |
| 2 | 2021-06-03 19:59 | wurzelast ♦1,560 | fix Tagging, very long name/description/note, Quelle war #osmi | |
| 3 | 2021-06-04 11:30 | Stefan@MUC ♦9 | Kannst du bitte in vollständigen deutschen Sätzen antworten? Ich verstehe nicht, was du mir sagen willst. | |
| 4 | 2021-06-04 11:35 | wurzelast ♦1,560 | OSM Inspector ist dir ein Begriff?https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/Unterrubrik Tagging, dort dannvery long name/description/note | |
| 5 | 2021-06-04 11:50 | Stefan@MUC ♦9 | Das erklärt, wie du den Node gefunden hast. Das erklärt aber nicht, was denn nun an der Information falsch war - das ist meine ursprüngliche Frage. Laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description darf die Description bis zu drei Sätze umfassen. Der von dir entfernte T... | |
| 6 | 2021-06-04 11:53 | wurzelast ♦1,560 | "Längere Informationen sollten per Referenz zu einer Webseite oder Wikipedia bereitgestellt werden." | |
| 7 | 2021-06-04 11:58 | Stefan@MUC ♦9 | Richtig, eine Information länger als drei Sätze soll anderweitig bereit gestellt werden. Die eingetragene Information war aber nicht mal halb so lang wie die Maximallänge - und sie hätte auch gekürzt statt komplett entfernt werden können. Ich bitte also um Wiederherstel... | |
| 8 | 2021-06-04 12:00 | wurzelast ♦1,560 | Gut, dann holen wir zurück. | |
| 9 | 2021-06-05 13:42 | dieterdreist | +1 für revert. Die Inspector Karten sind ja super, aber nicht immer ist alles falsch was dort hervorgehoben wird. Die maximale Länge von description tags wird über die API m.E. ausreichend limitiert. | |
| 10 | 2021-06-05 13:44 | dieterdreist | keine description ist sicherlich schlechter als eine zutreffende die etwas länger ist (aber noch im 255 Zeichen (bzw. etwas weniger wegen Sonderzeichen) limit bleibt) | |
| 11 | 2021-06-05 14:44 | wurzelast ♦1,560 | Im zweiten Blick war die Bearbeitung tatsächlich eher fragwürdig. Ich setz das mal zurück. | |
| 12 | 2021-06-05 17:49 | Stefan@MUC ♦9 | Vielen Dank! Ja, bei Bedarf kann man ja kürzen bzw. verfeinern - aber ganz ohne inhaltlichen Grund anzugeben einfach zu löschen ist schlecht. | |
| 50065209 by Nemo_bis @ 2017-07-05 18:14 | 1 | 2017-07-05 18:54 | Constable ♦1,294 | Ciao, ho visto che hai importato e rimosso un sacco di fontanelle, il lavoro è finito? chiedo perché allo stato attuale mi sembra che siano state rimossi i nodi che erano etichettati come fontanelle ed al loro posto ne siano comparsi altri che non sono etichettati come amenity=drinking... |
| 2 | 2017-07-05 20:05 | Nemo_bis ♦10 | Ciao, sí scusa, non ho finito. Speravo di fare tutto insieme ma non sono stato abbastanza efficiente e sono stato interrotto. :) | |
| 3 | 2017-07-06 06:02 | Constable ♦1,294 | ok, grazie per la risposta!Ciao | |
| 4 | 2017-07-06 06:20 | Nemo_bis ♦10 | Nel frattempo dovrei aver sistemato tutto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50067983 Ho anche ri-controllato qualche dozzina di nodi sulla mappa e mi sembrano tutte giuste (molte me le ricordo persino). Non ricordo mai però quante fontanelle ci siano in Duca d'Aosta... Almeno due,... | |
| 5 | 2017-07-06 06:27 | Constable ♦1,294 | Ciao, sono mesi e mesi che non ci passo ma dovrebbero essere quattro da quel che ricordo. | |
| 6 | 2021-05-19 17:44 | dieterdreist | il tag website dovrebbe descrivere il feature, non l’operator. Sarebbero da rimuovere… | |
| 7 | 2021-05-19 18:03 | Nemo_bis ♦10 | E che sito potrà mai esserci per descrivere una fontanella, se non il sito di chi la gestisce? Per esempio andando nel sito di MM si trovano informazioni sull'acqua che esce da quelle fontanelle e scavando un po' si può trovare quale è la pressione prevista, la manuten... | |
| 8 | 2021-05-19 18:07 | dieterdreist | per una fontanella forse no, ma non si dice con i tag che sono fontanelle, sono "fonti di acqua potabile" e con questo tag possono essere fontanelle, sorgenti, rubinetti, ecc.4 anni fa ancora non c'era, adesso abbiamo la chiave "fountain" per specificare meglio.Per me,... | |
| 9 | 2021-05-19 19:33 | Nemo_bis ♦10 | "The website=* tag can be used to provide the full URL to the official website for the related features" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:websiteÈ il sito ufficiale di quella fonte di acqua potabile, quindi decisamente corretto. | |
| 10 | 2021-05-20 06:51 | dieterdreist | Se fosse un link specifico (un numero, la fontanella specifica) sarebbe pertinente, così invece è sufficiente la source:url che da tutte le info necessarie, insieme al tag operator. Website non aggiunge niente perché se vai su quel sito la pagina dove ti porta è troppo ge... | |
| 11 | 2021-05-20 09:25 | Nemo_bis ♦10 | Quindi per esempio rimuoveresti anche tutti i collegamenti a https://www.bikemi.com/ da singole stazioni, il collegamento al sito della catena da ogni singolo supermercato, e cosí via? Forse hai ragione ma ci sarebbero parecchie migliaia di nodi da cambiare, forse ti conviene proporlo in http... | |
| 12 | 2021-05-28 23:23 | dieterdreist | scusami, non avevo visto la risposta. Sì, rimuoverei in generale il tag website quando è generico per l'operator e non ha informazioni specifici per l'oggetto che viene taggato. | |
| 13 | 2021-05-29 07:00 | Nemo_bis ♦10 | Allora mi sembra decisamente una cosa che dovresti proporre in una discussione piú generale, per esempio nel wiki. | |
| 104361466 by Città di Palmi @ 2021-05-08 11:40 | 1 | 2021-05-28 22:49 | dieterdreist | Ciao Città di Palmi, ho notato che stai disegnando le aree sempre troppo grandi, lasciandole finire al centro della strada. Così metà della strada diventa residenziale, o industriale ecc. Per esempio questa area ad uso industriale si mangia metà del GRA: https://www.ope... |
| 104361859 by Città di Palmi @ 2021-05-08 11:49 | 1 | 2021-05-28 22:42 | dieterdreist | se questo fosse una fabbrica non sarebbe da togliere man_made=works. Per aggiungere landuse=industrial non c'è bisogno di rimuove altri tags (se fossero validi). |
| 36610561 by dieterdreist @ 2016-01-16 09:34 | 1 | 2021-05-07 21:26 | sorcrosc ♦412 | I tag addr: su questa wayhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251509917credo che andavano messi invece su questo nodohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3949560017Ciao |
| 2 | 2021-05-07 22:42 | dieterdreist | grazie, hai ragione, questo è un problema di GoMap!! che da tanto fastidio: quando selezioni un nodo in un way senza tags e apri la finestra tags, ti cambia in automatico la selezione al way. Oramai mi sono malapena abituato, ma all’inizio non ne sapevo ancora. | |
| 3 | 2021-05-07 22:47 | dieterdreist | È peggio ancora: se fai copy + paste su un nodo, ma il way non ha tags, ti fa il paste sul way nonostante avessi selezionato il node. | |
| 4 | 2021-05-08 12:52 | sorcrosc ♦412 | Grazie. Ce ne sono altri due che ho visto su OSM Inspector:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142546202https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230742473 | |
| 5 | 2021-05-08 19:40 | dieterdreist | grazie a te, fissati :) | |
| 95057977 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-11-30 16:59 | 1 | 2021-05-05 20:24 | dieterdreist | blatant vandalism. Is already reverted. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95057977 |
| 51837500 by Michele Aquilani @ 2017-09-08 09:19 | 1 | 2021-03-31 11:45 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele, ho visto soltanto adesso che hai rimosso la sigla "GRA" dal GRA (ref). In questo modo, "GRA" non si trova più con la ricerca e non si vede da nessuna parte della mappa, solo nella realtà della segnaletica.Il ref "ufficiale" "A90" ... |
| 101418367 by Pedro Primor @ 2021-03-20 21:18 | 1 | 2021-03-31 11:35 | dieterdreist | Hi Pedro, I have seen you have moved the Rome node to piazza Navone. From my point of view, this is quite a bold move, relocating the place=city node of a major city with a millenial tradition without engaging with the local community first. I would be interesting in learning about the motives, and ... |
| 87036101 by Qwave @ 2020-06-23 12:53 | 1 | 2021-03-09 23:54 | dieterdreist | Hi, ich sehe gerade dass Du den Namen von der Olgastraße entfernt hast. Wieso?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147594400 |
| 2 | 2021-03-10 09:18 | Qwave ♦22 | Hallo,dieses ist ja nicht die offizielle Straße, sondern eine private Grundstückszufahrt zu den Gebäuden 2-4. Sie gehört nicht der Stadt (vgl. Flurstück Layer des online Stadtplans) und ist daher nicht von der Stadt mit einem offiziellem Namen versehen. Vielleicht wä... | |
| 3 | 2021-03-10 11:56 | dieterdreist | danke für das aktuelle Bild, ich kenne die Stelle gut. Bin mir allerdings nicht ganz sicher, ob es wirklich komplett eine Privatstraße ist, abgesehen vom letzen Stück entlang der Nummer 4, dort ist ja auch ein Tor (das immer offen steht bzw. stand). Ähnlich auf die Situation ent... | |
| 100093213 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-02-27 11:28 | 1 | 2021-02-27 12:15 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | You're breaking perfectly working tags. It is clearly stated in wiki that waterway=riverbank is a perfectly working tag which should not be changed. Reverted changes in Lithuania. |
| 2 | 2021-02-27 17:01 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | How am I breaking "perfectly working tags" and what even is "perfectly working tags"? There is no such definition in the wiki. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-27 17:12 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | The point is you are not "upgrading" any tags. You're just doing a pointless change removing tags which are perfectly fine. Therefore you're not doing anything good to this project. | |
| 4 | 2021-02-27 17:13 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | And it is also said in wiki that water tags should NOT be changed just for the sake of changing it. You're not doing any improvement to the map, just going around and changing to tags with the same meaning. | |
| 5 | 2021-02-27 17:24 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | Since when "guarding" a country from other editors is considered good for OSM? | |
| 6 | 2021-02-27 17:30 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | Since some people start "fixing" stuff which is not broken before getting to know OSM. | |
| 7 | 2021-02-27 17:49 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | But you are fixing stuff that are not broken.. | |
| 8 | 2021-02-27 17:54 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | waterway=riverbank is a perfectly woriking tag and there is no "upgrade" for it. | |
| 9 | 2021-02-27 17:59 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | natural=water + water=river is also perfectly working tag. Why wouldn't you want to use it? | |
| 10 | 2021-02-27 18:11 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | The original is working very good and the new one does not add anything beneficial. General rule: do not touch things which work well and which you do not understand. Do not change things just in order to do some "change". | |
| 11 | 2021-02-27 18:23 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | I see that you haven't seen what I've done in my changesets. I fix the numerous mistakes that were made years ago and no one has fixed them (like disconnected ways, accidentally moved nodes in ways, duplicated ways/nodes etc.). | |
| 12 | 2021-02-27 18:41 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | No, you have changed a lot of objects which you have not fixed. And anyway, at the sime time you've decided that you, after spending less than a year in OSM, will force everybody else to use duplicate water tags instead of the ones we used for more than 15 years? Why? | |
| 13 | 2021-02-27 18:54 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | There could be things that I have missed and there could be things that I can't fix since the imagery is not the best in some places. About your last question: it's not my decision. It is a project ran by another user. The goal is to unify the tagging system so that data consumers don'... | |
| 14 | 2021-02-27 19:01 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | And thus you're doing damage to data consumers, who are using waterway=riverbank for 15 years or more. Ok, this has already wasted too much of my time. DO NOT CHANGE ANYTHING in Lithuania. We want data QUALITY, not chaos created by clueless "unifiers". | |
| 15 | 2021-02-27 19:06 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | These data consumers won't be here for a lot of time if they haven't changed anything in 15 years. If things don't change, this project will become even bigger chaos. Also you aren't the person to tell me what to do or not to do. | |
| 16 | 2021-02-27 19:13 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | Data consumers do not want change for the sake of change. The new schema you're forcing does not have ANY advantages. You will not be able to force such changes on larger countries as they also oppose such unprofessional actions. We are here for way more than you have been here and probably wil... | |
| 17 | 2021-02-27 19:22 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | The only data consumer that doesn't want the change is you. The new schema does not have any advantages FOR YOU. The world DOES NOT spin around you or Lithuania. I do not enforce these changes since anyone can revert anything if they so desire. I don't know who are you referring by "w... | |
| 18 | 2021-02-27 19:27 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | Eventually you will grow up and learn not to point fingers when you enter the house. Or maybe not :-) | |
| 19 | 2021-02-27 19:33 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | Are there any other countries that are guarded by people like you? Are there any projects except yours that rely on this exact tagging and doesn't want to support the newer standard? I don't think that any company or project that doesn't want to improve over time will not survive for... | |
| 20 | 2021-02-27 19:38 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | There are pretty large countries where OSM users also think that duplicate water schema is not only giving no advantage, but has disadvantage from cartographic and mapping perspectives. Bye. | |
| 21 | 2021-02-27 19:42 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | This is what we are trying to solve. We want to remove waterway=riverbank in order to not have duplicate water schema. I don't see where is the problem. | |
| 22 | 2021-02-27 19:46 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | Don't you think it is quite stupid to INTRODUCE duplicate schema and then try to "SOLVE" the duplication? This whole initiative of new water schema was introduced by nerds and is only pushed by nerds, it was never supported by anybody doing serious stuff. | |
| 23 | 2021-02-27 19:51 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | I haven't introduced this schema. The problem wouldn't even exist if by creating the new schema, the old one was deprecated. Unfortunately it wasn't done, but if it doesn't get done now it won't get done. | |
| 24 | 2021-02-27 19:54 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | Google, young soldier, you will find way too many discussions about this same topic. And don't try to find one single truth as there can not be one. | |
| 25 | 2021-02-28 11:39 | GoodClover ♦43 | All good data consumers support both schemas, as they have both existed for quite some time.If you're saying that there are some that don't support natural=water + water=river then I greatly urge you to add support for both schemas.There are large parts of the map that only use the new... | |
| 26 | 2021-02-28 11:42 | GoodClover ♦43 | And if you're claiming you're opinion is more valid because you've got an older account please stop - that's bogus. | |
| 27 | 2021-02-28 12:05 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | I'm saying that waterway=riverbank is a perfectly working schema and changing it to a duplicate one just for the sake of changing is stupid and pointless. Better do something useful. | |
| 28 | 2021-02-28 13:06 | GoodClover ♦43 | In that case reverting every time someone does it is equally as pointless - especially when people also fix errors | |
| 29 | 2021-02-28 13:13 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | Lets call DWG and see what they think about doing semi-automated changes of tagging when it is clearly stated in wiki as well as stated multiple times on multiple mailing lists that this SHOULD NOT BE DONE. Changeset comment is not the place to discuss the tagging schemes, currently BOTH are valid a... | |
| 30 | 2021-02-28 13:27 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | I'm just joining this discussion to call for more politeness and understanding to each other. I'm not going to point fingers at any person or action, but this behaviour is not what the OSM community is about. | |
| 31 | 2021-03-05 10:37 | dieterdreist | It is one thing to add (alternative) tags (possible as long as different keys are used) and another to remove tags without a need (not necessary if they use a different key). Edits like this, performed on a bigger scale (e.g. also in Italy) must be discussed before they are executed.Cheers,Marti... | |
| 32 | 2021-03-05 19:35 | GoodClover ♦43 | It is documentedhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:ZeLonewolf/Procedure/River_modernizationHowever Lithuania is sticking to the old tagging, so it shouldn't be touched | |
| 33 | 2021-03-05 20:26 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,956 | Wiki has always been, is now, and will probably always stay a place for OPINION, not for authoritative stuff. Brian (ZeLonewolf) or Mateusz are lacking basic experience but baking huge amounts of pages/changes of low quality on wiki which few people actually read. Number of wikians agreeing with t... | |
| 34 | 2021-04-11 13:55 | woodpeck ♦2,431 | With my DWG hat on:1. User ZeLoneWolf had initially not taken enough care to make sure that his approach isn't used in areas where it was not discussed with the community. This has meanwhile been remedied on the respective wiki page.2. User Dimitar155 has not used enough care in following... | |
| 100292747 by nifan @ 2021-03-02 16:24 | 1 | 2021-03-03 10:23 | corfede ♦300 | Ciao nifan, con questo e l'altro changeset hai modificato decine di place promuovendoli a town, indicando come motivo che si tratta di comuni autonomi. Non è però un metodo condiviso, infatti nella wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:place) è riportata una clas... |
| 2 | 2021-03-03 11:20 | dieterdreist | per me il revert è anche giustificato dal fatto che si tratta di modifiche massicce. Sono "solo" 65 nodi, ma ad un elemento molto importante come un centro abitato, dove praticamente ogni singolo caso va discusso, perché influisce in maniera importante alla mappa, e perch&eac... | |
| 3 | 2021-03-03 13:56 | fayor ♦125 | È evidente che nifan ha equivocato sul senso dell'eccezione presente sulla wiki sul place village: "Centri abitati da 200 a 10mila abitanti. Eccezioni: comuni autonomi e capoluoghi di comunisparsi.”L'eccezione si riferisce ai centri al di sotto del limite minimo di 20... | |
| 99999999 by AE35 @ 2021-02-25 19:29 | 1 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Kovoschiz ♦2,543 | Thanks and congratulations on changeset #99999999 |
| 2 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | fghj753 ♦53 | nice | |
| 3 | 2021-02-25 19:34 | GoodClover ♦43 | 99999999 is definitely a cooler number than 100000000 | |
| 4 | 2021-02-25 19:37 | Mxdanger ♦77 | I agree. | |
| 5 | 2021-02-25 19:44 | Palolo ♦457 | Missed 100m by a fraction of a second. | |
| 6 | 2021-02-25 21:27 | Janjko ♦86 | Very good changeset, thank you very much! | |
| 7 | 2021-02-26 05:13 | Magick93 ♦35 | As good as getting the 100 millionth Changeset. GET! | |
| 8 | 2021-02-27 10:13 | NM$L ♦83 | 哈哈，可惜差了一点啊😂 | |
| 9 | 2021-03-02 22:55 | dieterdreist | congrats! | |
| 10 | 2023-04-11 00:51 | Mason1007 ♦7 | moments before an achievement | |
| 54071296 by gnastyle @ 2017-11-25 12:51 | 1 | 2021-03-01 09:46 | dieterdreist | Ciao Gnastyle, ho visto che hai taggato la chiesa evangelica con denomination "evangelical", e vorrei chiedere conferma, perché probabilmente il valore giusto sarebbe "protestant" (generico) oppure qualcosa di più specifico come "lutheran", etc. Il termine... |
| 99598772 by Antonio DB @ 2021-02-19 13:49 | 1 | 2021-02-21 11:31 | dieterdreist | Gentile Antonio,benvenuto in OSM. Ho notato che ti sei inscritto ed hai inserito delle cose, ottimo. Per il giardino condominiale hai utilizzato l'etichetta "landuse=meadow". Questo significa "prato" e viene utilizzato in contesto rurale (agricoltura). Se ti posso suggerir... |
| 97794533 by fede6615 @ 2021-01-19 22:09 | 1 | 2021-02-10 23:22 | dieterdreist | con questa modifica sono stati cancellati tutte le tag che descrivevano il parco di Veio, e sono stato sostituiti con "suolo ad uso residenziale". E' una modifica apposita o per sbaglio? |
| 2 | 2021-02-17 22:53 | fede6615 ♦3 | Effettivamente ho creato suoli ad uso residenziali, perchè come puoi vedere dalle immagini satelliutari ci sono case, ti posso dire che sono di zona e li ci sono effettivamente centri abitati (Con rispettivi nomi). Si stava anche già discutendo su come cambiare questa cosa, non sappiam... | |
| 3 | 2021-02-18 23:39 | dieterdreist | Ciao Fede,ti consiglio di aggiungere piccoli blocchi di isolati, senza connettere i poligoni con le strade, in modo da avere "il suolo privato, residenziale" / le abitazioni compresi i giardini e le aree interne, e mettendo i tag "landuse=residential" dove ci sono abitazioni, i... | |
| 98712394 by fede6615 @ 2021-02-04 14:56 | 1 | 2021-02-10 23:30 | dieterdreist | ci sarà un motivo per la cancellazione di 143 nodi ed un percorso in versione 4 che vorresti spiegare? |
| 2 | 2021-02-17 22:55 | fede6615 ♦3 | il percorso era solo una specie di "Contorno" Della zona abitata via di Valle Muricana, non esiste veramente. Magari poteva essere una zona ad uso residenziale, ma l'area è già stata fatta, quindi mi sembrava inutile mantenere essa modifica. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-17 23:00 | fede6615 ♦3 | perchè hai aggiunto "Possible vandalism" Sono solo un principiante di openstreetmap, mica voglio cancellare tutte le strade di Roma😂😂 | |
| 4 | 2021-02-18 23:28 | dieterdreist | scusami, se non sei un vandalo allora benvenuto! Abbiamo recentemente avuto un problema con una persona che ha aggiunto qualcosa e cancellato altre cose come foreste, landuse=residential o campi agricoli, sempre usando commenti per le modifiche senza senso/non pertinenti, e ho avuto il sospetto che ... | |
| 97853658 by fede6615 @ 2021-01-20 17:30 | 1 | 2021-02-10 23:32 | dieterdreist | anche qui hai cancellato dei percorsi lunghi (tutti parte del confine del parco di Veio). |
| 98780999 by fede6615 @ 2021-02-05 16:52 | 1 | 2021-02-10 23:20 | dieterdreist | Ciao Fede, ti vorrei chiedere di mettere dei commenti più lunghi e significativi per descrivere le modifiche che hai fatto. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_commentsUn saluto,Martin |
| 98416127 by David Hubert @ 2021-01-30 14:22 | 1 | 2021-02-10 07:05 | FreiTal ♦60 | Findest du es richtig website=* zu löschen?Es ist immer noch ein gültiger Schlüssel. das nun das contact:*-Schema durchgesetzt wird finde ich nicht richtig. Viele Abfragen auf website=* laufen nun ins Leere.z.B. Wohnanlage "Alte Schule"Auch bei phone=* zu contact:phone... |
| 2 | 2021-02-10 08:01 | David Hubert ♦4 | Es gibt 2 Lager: Die pro contact: und die dagegen, und da ist keine Einigung in Sicht.Aber Daten doppelt zu speichern geht gegen jedes Prinzip der Informationstechnik.Eine korrekte Abfrage berücksichtigt beide Tags, aber was soll angezeigt werden, wenn es beide gibt? 2 Webseiten? Die lä... | |
| 3 | 2021-02-10 09:30 | FreiTal ♦60 | Da es keine Einigung gibt, sollte beides erhalten bleiben.Die ganzen alte Abfragen bringen jetzt Fehler, die nicht nötig sind. | |
| 4 | 2021-02-10 09:32 | David Hubert ♦4 | Hallo,Um welche Anfragen handelt es sich denn? Welche App etc? | |
| 5 | 2021-02-10 09:43 | Negreheb ♦263 | Im Forum wurde ein Thread eröffnet, vielleicht dort weiter diskutieren. Meine Meinung steht auch dort. Link: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=818370 | |
| 6 | 2021-02-10 09:47 | Negreheb ♦263 | @FreiTalDas nächste mal weise doch deinen Gesprächpartner bitte auch darauf hin, dass du im Forum einen Thread eröffnet hast, damit er auch die Chance hat, sich dort zu verteidigen. | |
| 7 | 2021-02-10 09:49 | dieterdreist | Da es keine Einigung gibt, sollte "website" auf jeden Fall erhalten bleiben, das Umtaggen würde ich als halb-automatischen Edit sehen, über den abgestimmt werden muss. Grundsätzlich würde ich es eher anders rum umtaggen, von contact:website nach "website", wei... | |
| 8 | 2021-02-10 09:49 | SafetyIng ♦348 | @FreiTal - auf welches Objekt beziehst du dich denn hier?Also die Änderungen, die ich gesehen habe - dann geht es ja hier um Facebook.Facebook-Seiten sind keine Webseite..... | |
| 9 | 2021-02-10 10:00 | Negreheb ♦263 | Bitte im Forum nachlesen: Maproulette geht es explizit darum website=*facebook* nach contact:facebook=* umzutaggen. Und das ist völlig korrekt und da muss dann website=* auch nicht bestehen bleiben. Bitte im Forum weiter diskutieren, damit das nicht so verteilt ist. (Meine Meinung zumindest) | |
| 51835249 by Michele Aquilani @ 2017-09-08 08:02 | 1 | 2019-05-16 16:17 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele, ho solo ora visto che hai rimosso ref=GRA e messo A90, ma questo ref era già lì nella chiave official_ref, avevamo lasciato GRA perchè la segnaletica continua a indicare GRA. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.... |
| 2 | 2021-02-10 08:52 | dieterdreist | Nessuna risposta. Rinnovo la richiesta, che senso ha ripetere "A90" due volte e far sparire "GRA", il quale ancora ad oggi si trova nel territorio? Ti chiederei gentilmente di rimettere ref=GRA per il GRA, in quanto questo è la dicitura che si trova sui cartelli.Grazie,\... | |
| 97211399 by mr4703 @ 2021-01-09 12:55 | 1 | 2021-01-10 07:30 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo mr4703,Willkommen bei OSM.Du hast an diesem Gebäudehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159327802/historydas Merkmalamenity=fire_stationgelöscht und das Merkmalbuilding=yesabgeändert inbuilding=fire_station.building=fire_station sagt nur aus, daß diese... |
| 2 | 2021-01-10 12:00 | mr4703 ♦2 | Hallo PT-53,Danke für Deine Willkommensworte.Die Änderung musst Du nicht für mich übernehmen, da ich keinen Grund hierfür sehe und Deinen Argumenten nicht folgende kann.Du verweisst auf die Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=fire%20station?use... | |
| 3 | 2021-01-10 12:39 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo mr4703, Du hast vollkommen recht, daß es noch besser ist, das gesamte Feuerwehr-Gelände mit amenity=fire_stationzu markieren. Das hast Du aber (noch ?) nicht gemacht, so daß die Information "hier ist ein Feuerwehr-Standort" derzeit fehlt.Mangels örtlich... | |
| 4 | 2021-01-10 19:32 | mr4703 ♦2 | Hallo,zu Deiner Aussage:"Dein Argument, daß in ganz Deutschland in einem Feuerwehrhaus immer auch eine Feuerwehr untergebracht ist, ist in der realen Welt sicher richtig.Daraus aber abzuleiten, daß das Gebäude-Merkmalbuilding=fire_stationausreichend ist um >>... | |
| 5 | 2021-01-10 19:57 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Ich wiederhole:building=fire_stattionsagt nur aus, daß das Gebäude für eine Feuerwehr-Station gebaut wurde / geeignet ist. Das Merkmal, daß dort eine Feuerwehr untergebracht ist, istamenity=fire_stationOhne amenity=fiee_station gibt es dort - in der OSM-Datenbank - ke... | |
| 6 | 2021-01-11 08:17 | mr4703 ♦2 | Ich glaube hier liegt ein Missverständniss vor. Auf der englischen Seite des Key:building ist zu lesen "A building which houses fire fighting equipment ready for use."Die deutsche Übersetzung scheint mir hier nicht aussagekräftig genug, da sie lediglich von einem "... | |
| 7 | 2021-01-11 08:51 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo mr4703, ich habe zu unserer Diskussion eine Anfrage im OSM-Forum eingestellt:https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=814594#p814594Es wäre gut, wenn Du Dich dort an der folgenden Diskussion beteiligen würdest.Du kannst Dich mit Deinem OSM-Account im OSM-Forum einl... | |
| 8 | 2021-01-11 09:26 | dieterdreist | ich kenne zumindest ein prominentes Feuerwehrgebäude in Deutschland, das nicht als Feuerwache genutzt wird: das Gebäude das für die Werksfeuerwehr in Weil am Rhein auf dem Vitra Firmengelände von Zaha Hadid errichtet wurde.https://duckduckgo.com/?q=vitra+fire+station+in+weil+am... | |
| 9 | 2021-01-11 10:26 | mr4703 ♦2 | das ist zwar ein Gebäude für die Feuerwehr, jedoch nicht als Nutzung "Feuerwache". Hier wäre dann die Nutzung z. B. Büro oder Lager, etc.Somit z. B.-Grundstück=> amenity=fire_station-Gebäude A=> building=office-Gebäude B => building=fire_... | |
| 10 | 2021-01-11 10:27 | seewäldler ♦169 | Die Jugendherberge in Plauen ist auch in einem schönen Feuerwehrhaus, komplett mit Schläuche-Trocken-Turm und großen Toren mit alten Feuerwehrauto dahinter. | |
| 11 | 2021-01-11 10:54 | mr4703 ♦2 | @seewälderfür diesen Fall müsste doch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:partgenutzt werden um die unterscheidung der unterschiedlichen Nutzungen zu präzisieren. Richtig?Und dann sind wir wieder bei meinem Gedanken. | |
| 12 | 2021-01-11 11:13 | smootheFiets ♦178 | Natürlich gehört hier zwingend eine amenity hin. Ob aufs Gebäude oder Gelände ist zweitrangig. So funktioniert das Tagging auf OSM nun einmal. Ich verstehe nicht, dass es darüber eine Diskussion gibt. | |
| 13 | 2021-01-11 11:20 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Wird das Gebäude in Pfullendorf ausschließlich durch die Feuerwehr genutzt oder gibt es weitere "Nutzer" ?Wenn "ein" Gebäude unterschiedlich genutzt wird, kann das Gebäude - sofern die exakte Ausdehnung der unterschiedlichen Nutzungsarten bekannt ist - ... | |
| 14 | 2021-01-12 08:08 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo mr4703, schön daß Du das Merkmal amenity=fire_station wieder ergänzt hast.Eine entspr. Rückmeldung wäre aber auch angemessen gewesen.Grüße | |
| 15 | 2021-01-13 01:03 | dieterdreist | zum Thema building und building:part, das ist eigentlich ganz einfach: beide tags beschreiben nur das Gebäude, nicht die Nutzung darin. Für Nutzer braucht man noch andere tags, am besten auf eigenen Objekten (z.B. nodes). Nutzer haben tags wie amenity, office, shop, craft, etc. | |
| 16 | 2021-01-13 07:54 | mr4703 ♦2 | Ich möchte nochmals meine Anmerkung vom 11-1-21 8:17 wiederholen:"Ich glaube hier liegt ein Missverständniss vor. Auf der englischen Seite des Key:building ist zu lesen"A building which houses fire fighting equipment ready for use."Die deutsche Übersetzung sch... | |
| 17 | 2021-01-13 08:03 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo mr4703, ich würde es sehr begrüßen, wenn Du diesen Kommentar im OSM-Forum posten würdest. Dort lesen wesentlich mehr Mapper mit und ist somit besser geeignet solche grundsätzlichen Diskussionen zu führen.Grüße | |
| 18 | 2021-01-13 09:32 | dieterdreist | ich habe den engl. Wikieintrag unter key:building repariert und dem Eintrag tag|building|fire_station angepasst. Der building tag ist immer auf Gebäude bezogen und sagt nie etwas darüber aus, wer das Gebäude aktuell nutzt. Eine ehemalige Feuerwache erhält denselben building tag w... | |
| 19 | 2021-01-20 07:49 | mr4703 ♦2 | Hallo dieterdreist,deine Ergänzungen des "engl. Wikieintrag unter key:building" kann ich nicht finden. Die letzte Änderung ist auf den 14.12.20 datiert. | |
| 20 | 2021-01-20 10:41 | dieterdreist | huch, keine Ahnung wie das passiert ist, habe jetzt an verschiedener Stelle Ergänzungen vorgenommen... | |
| 92277188 by Matlux @ 2020-10-10 14:21 | 1 | 2021-01-16 13:32 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Please don't use the live OSM database for testing - search the wiki for "sandbox" for various testing optionsBest Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2021-01-16 13:55 | dieterdreist | too late, wanted to say the same 🍑 | |
| 97223122 by sorcrosc @ 2021-01-09 18:00 | 1 | 2021-01-15 18:09 | dieterdreist | GRAZIE! Sei un grande! |
| 87520880 by Adamant1 @ 2020-07-04 01:57 | 1 | 2021-01-12 13:23 | dieterdreist | strange, another town where you removed an amenity=hospice tag? There is no reason to remove it, you did not set a different amenity tag. I believe this is part of a disguised undiscussed edit. |
| 2 | 2021-01-12 20:46 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Oh goody, are we back to the false accusations of "disguised undiscussed edits" again? This is a part of the same exact supposedly "disguised" edits you and SomeoneElse accused me of before that you never provided any evidence for, that went know where, Woodpeck said I didn'... | |
| 3 | 2021-01-13 07:51 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo Adamant1,aus der History ergibt sich eindeutig, daß Du das Merkmalamenity=hospicegelöscht und dafür das Merkmalhealthcare=hospiceeingetragen hast.Bei uns ist es üblich beide Merkmale zu verwenden! Bitte beachte dies und nimm Deine Löschung zurück.G... | |
| 4 | 2021-01-13 07:53 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Sorry, but I don't speak German, Dutch, or whatever language that is. | |
| 5 | 2021-01-13 07:59 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Never mind. I used Google translate. I disagree that it costumery to use two tags for the exact same thing on a POI. The Wiki says as much and I've had multiple conversations where people have told me so. Especially in cases where "newer", more widely accepted tags come along and mor... | |
| 6 | 2021-01-13 08:04 | Adamant1 ♦222 | That said, as I've said already, just now and six months ago when this originally came up, people are free to this however they want and I could really give a crap how it's tagged. I'm not "withdrawing my deletion" though. Whatever that means. Just because people like you an... | |
| 7 | 2021-01-13 08:44 | dieterdreist | Adamant, I take back the "disguised", and I beg your pardon for having forgotten that we have already talked about it. Still, there clearly is an issue, you are remotely editing stuff in an area which you do not know, removing tags that locals have set, without giving a clear reason. Which... | |
| 8 | 2021-01-13 08:50 | dieterdreist | Btw: the tag has almost zero uses because you and others have removed them in the past months. By the time you removed it, there were still much more than there are now. You are right that we could just add the tag back, but we are having this discussion here because you are a very active mapper a... | |
| 9 | 2021-01-13 08:55 | Adamant1 ♦222 | People remotely change and remove tags all the time. Almost every edit in OSM is exactly that. It's only an issue in this case because your making it one. In this case, as I already told you on the Wiki, which you've seemed to ignore for whatever reason, I looked around the website and... | |
| 10 | 2021-01-13 08:55 | Adamant1 ♦222 | "Something that was already resolved. | |
| 11 | 2021-01-13 08:56 | Adamant1 ♦222 | "Your not raising awareness about anything | |
| 12 | 2021-01-13 08:59 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Also, if you want to go with the nativist "only tag where you live" crap, cool. You, Polar Bearing, SomeoneElse, Woodpeck, and all the other European mappers that keep mapping around America and telling us America's how to map things, usually rather condescendingly I might add, can st... | |
| 13 | 2021-01-13 09:41 | dieterdreist | I do not say: only map where you are on the ground, although I believe it is the best. I say do not remove tags from objects, without further discussion with the local community, in places which you do not know and where you do not know the community. Adding things from aerial imagery bears some ris... | |
| 14 | 2021-01-13 09:50 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Cool if that's your standard. That doesn't mean it's anyone else's standard or that there's anything with not doing it "your" way. As I said, plenty of people tag things based what they read about a business it's website. For instance, I highly doubt the vast ... | |
| 15 | 2021-01-13 09:52 | Adamant1 ♦222 | BTW, it should obvious that the "one the ground rule" means things have to ground verifiable. Not that "on the ground" is the only way people can add or edit things. | |
| 16 | 2021-01-13 09:52 | dieterdreist | See, you write"People remotely change and remove tags all the time. Almost every edit in OSM is exactly that. It's only an issue in this case because your making it one.In this case, as I already told you on the Wiki, which you've seemed to ignore for whatever reason, I looked a... | |
| 17 | 2021-01-13 09:56 | dieterdreist | the "ground" does not tell you whether amenity or healthcare is more appropriate, and whether one of them must be removed or both could be kept (why not?). Being on the ground means you know the general setting, what is customary, the local culture, language etc., requirements to really pa... | |
| 18 | 2021-01-13 10:08 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Since when does every single edit someone makes need to be discussed before they make it? You people act like anything that doesn't involve a ton of graveling to a mailing list before hand isn't valid. No matter how biennial the edit is. Yet, most of the time none of you "things shoul... | |
| 19 | 2021-01-13 10:09 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Especially because pretty much every disagreement can be resolved without needing to take it to that level. | |
| 20 | 2021-01-13 10:29 | dieterdreist | "Since when does every single edit someone makes need to be discussed before they make it?" - while it would be nice when you actually __remove__ what others have bothered to add, it is not strictly a requirement, I agree. When you actually go out and do several of these removals in differ... | |
| 21 | 2021-01-14 23:09 | Adamant1 ♦222 | The problem with the witch hunting way of doing this is that you treat people like they are doing something wrong or against the guidelines. Not in a way that doesn't fit your personal preference of what would be "nice" to do. There's plenty of things I think it would be "ni... | |
| 87481796 by Adamant1 @ 2020-07-03 05:37 | 1 | 2021-01-12 13:26 | dieterdreist | strange, another town where you removed an amenity=hospice tag? There is no reason to remove it, you did not set a different amenity tag. I believe this is part of a disguised undiscussed edit. |
| 87520980 by Adamant1 @ 2020-07-04 02:10 | 1 | 2021-01-12 13:25 | dieterdreist | strange, another town where you removed an amenity=hospice tag? There is no reason to remove it, you did not set a different amenity tag. I believe this is part of a disguised undiscussed edit. |
| 87520870 by Adamant1 @ 2020-07-04 01:56 | 1 | 2021-01-12 13:18 | dieterdreist | Hi, I noticed you removed the amenity=hospice tag. Can you explain the reasoning? |
| 71990985 by Komplekx @ 2019-07-07 20:20 | 1 | 2021-01-12 13:10 | dieterdreist | Hi, habe gesehen dass Du mit dem großen Besen da durch gegangen bist. Wieso wurde der building:levels tags vom Audimax entfernt? |
| 96484112 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-27 13:28 | 1 | 2021-01-05 13:38 | dieterdreist | always the same scheme: your representation is "better", this update again removed a lot of detail in favor of a medium scale generalization which could be automatically constructed from the details if somebody wanted. revert. |
| 96484414 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-27 13:36 | 1 | 2021-01-05 13:36 | dieterdreist | any explanation why your representation is "better"? |
| 96500538 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-27 22:23 | 1 | 2020-12-28 09:44 | Cascafico ♦577 | Un mappatore prima di te ha speso il suo tempo per cliccare 568 volte su una foto aerea per dettagliare delle aree. Prima di cancellare tutto il suo lavoro, hai pensato di consultarlo? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96500538 ... |
| 2 | 2021-01-05 13:33 | dieterdreist | another place where Città dei Palmi has deleted detailed landuse and has replaced it with a questionable polygon that errateously contains a lot of different landuse like landuse=highway and landuse=railway. Revert. | |
| 96500890 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-27 22:37 | 1 | 2021-01-05 13:27 | dieterdreist | better church representation and also deleting a natural=wood for no reason? |
| 96821705 by Città di Palmi @ 2021-01-02 19:23 | 1 | 2021-01-05 12:41 | dieterdreist | accurate geometry of way 564140923 deleted without any mention in the comment or reasoning. |
| 96822096 by Città di Palmi @ 2021-01-02 19:34 | 1 | 2021-01-05 12:40 | dieterdreist | another example of detailed landuse replaced by a gigantic and untrue landuse=meadow. Please stop replacing detailed landuse. Please check the meaning of landuse=meadow. |
| 96919180 by Città di Palmi @ 2021-01-04 15:38 | 1 | 2021-01-05 12:34 | dieterdreist | Buongiorno Città di Palmi, ho notato che in questo changeset hai cancellato una serie di alberi che sembra ci siano. Vorrei far notare che l'inserimento di un natural=tree_row non comporta l'eliminazione di singoli alberi.Un saluto,MartinPS: Ti chiedo di essere più ... |
| 96935969 by damianeue @ 2021-01-04 22:25 | 1 | 2021-01-04 22:39 | dieterdreist | Why did you remove the names from the sidewalks? |
| 2 | 2021-01-04 22:40 | damianeue ♦112 | Because the sidewalks themselves don't have a specific name | |
| 3 | 2021-01-04 23:00 | dieterdreist | thank you for the discussion on the Italian telegram channel. | |
| 4 | 2021-01-05 10:03 | SekeRob ♦1,435 | Bus stops have names (that of the street they are on, in pescara including the civic number the are at), it's a specific question in the Streetcomplete app and used as an identifier in a route relation. Please put it back. | |
| 5 | 2021-01-05 10:13 | damianeue ♦112 | Essendo quella fermata nello specifico un capolinea il nome della fermata è quello della destinazione dell'autobus (non mi sembra che le fermate al Terminal degli autobus di Pescara abbiano come nome Corso Vittorio Emanuele II), io il nome l'avevo messo ma è stato modificato,... | |
| 6 | 2021-01-05 10:34 | dieterdreist | non sono del posto, ma per le fermate (compresi i capolinea) dovrebbe essere semplice trovare il nome: c’è scritto sul palo/cartello. Invece qualora ci fossero varianti nel orario stampato/in rete, quel nome va in “ref_name”https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ref_name | |
| 7 | 2021-01-06 11:06 | SekeRob ♦1,435 | On removing sidewalk names, removing other peoples contribution carefully reconsider: Quote from Wiki "A drawback of this approach is that acquiring a name of the associated street in automated way is challenging. Some mappers therefore add name or street:name tags copying the name of the stree... | |
| 95383858 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-06 22:49 | 1 | 2020-12-21 22:46 | dieterdreist | vandalism |
| 2 | 2021-01-03 02:14 | sorcrosc ♦412 | Assurdo. Lo hai già segnalato? | |
| 3 | 2021-01-03 12:09 | dieterdreist | sì, tempo fa alla DWG che ha emesso un 0day block:https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4647 | |
| 72084514 by dieterdreist @ 2019-07-10 08:51 | 1 | 2020-12-20 14:18 | dktue ♦208 | Sollte man die Stadttore wirklich mappen? Sie existieren ja nicht mehr. |
| 2 | 2020-12-22 00:12 | dieterdreist | als Tore existieren sie nur noch als „Echo“/Spuren, im Sinne dass sich die Stadt (Straßen) danach orientiert, aber unter den Tübingern existieren sie als Orte durchaus. „Lass uns am Haagtor treffen“ versteht jeder... | |
| 3 | 2020-12-22 13:59 | dktue ♦208 | Wäre es da nicht besser den Ort einfach als Lokalnamen (wie auch immer zu Taggen) einzutragen? Es ist ja de facto kein Tor mehr da, was man aber nach aktuellem Mapping durchaus vermuten könnte. | |
| 95383235 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-06 22:21 | 1 | 2020-12-21 22:47 | dieterdreist | vandalism |
| 95383311 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-06 22:24 | 1 | 2020-12-21 22:47 | dieterdreist | vandalism |
| 95449496 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-07 23:04 | 1 | 2020-12-21 22:46 | dieterdreist | vandalism |
| 95449775 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-07 23:17 | 1 | 2020-12-21 22:46 | dieterdreist | vandalism |
| 95450007 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-07 23:28 | 1 | 2020-12-21 22:45 | dieterdreist | vandalism |
| 95451196 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-08 00:31 | 1 | 2020-12-21 22:43 | dieterdreist | vandalism |
| 2 | 2022-04-15 21:17 | ALn_668 ♦11 | vandalism fixed also here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119765974 | |
| 3 | 2022-04-15 21:18 | ALn_668 ♦11 | same here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119766004 | |
| 95490043 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-08 13:18 | 1 | 2020-12-21 22:42 | dieterdreist | vandalism |
| 95491042 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-08 13:37 | 1 | 2020-12-21 22:42 | dieterdreist | vandalism |
| 95490784 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-08 13:32 | 1 | 2020-12-21 22:39 | dieterdreist | vandalism |
| 94903703 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-11-27 15:21 | 1 | 2020-12-21 22:27 | dieterdreist | come mai tutte queste cose cancellate? |
| 95568258 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-12-09 17:34 | 1 | 2020-12-21 22:08 | dieterdreist | Hi Città di Palmi, can you please explain what you have been doing here? This looks like vandalism, but maybe there is an explanation? Your changeset comment is not helpful either (minor modifications) |
| 84475043 by Elapsus @ 2020-05-01 14:14 | 1 | 2020-12-21 11:02 | dieterdreist | Hi Elapsus, I believe there is a problem with this edit, because you added the wikidata reference of the Quartiere toponomastico to this "zona urbanistica". Have a look at name and ref tags and at this relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5460386 which has the same link to wiki... |
| 2 | 2020-12-21 13:28 | Elapsus ♦9 | I think to fixed the difference. There is a confusion with two parts who are almost the same... | |
| 3 | 2020-12-21 14:41 | dieterdreist | It depends on the question how similar one sees “aree toponomastiche” and “zone urbanistiche”, but it clearly is a case where the reference from the wikipedia article to wikidata is not about the same wikidata item that is suitable for the object in OpenStreetMap, while the w... | |
| 90635333 by physi @ 2020-09-09 09:37 | 1 | 2020-12-11 20:56 | Corrales86 ♦5 | Hey physi,Magst du kurz schreiben was deine Quelle/Motiviation für dieses Changeset war. Auf den von dir als Quelle in deinem CS genannten Luftbildern (Bing, Esri) ist das Forsthaus Bergerbusch noch vorhanden. An anderer Stelle wo nach den Luftbildern ein Haus steht, ist jetzt Ackerfläch... |
| 2 | 2020-12-12 05:19 | physi ♦47 | Hallo Corrales86,ich war vor drei Monaten selbst vor Ort und habe danach eine Liste von Beobachtungen eingearbeitet. Luftbilder oder Karten wurden dazu nicht verwendet. Ich kann aber selbstverständlich nicht sicher ausschließen, dass mir dabei ein Fehler unterlaufen ist. Wenn du also &u... | |
| 3 | 2020-12-12 15:22 | Corrales86 ♦5 | heute war ich dort vor Ort. Das Forsthaus Bergerbusch steht noch, das Grundstück dazu ist auch noch da. Onnau ebenfalls, beides ist on the ground mit traffic_sign=DE:385 gekennzeichnet. Das Haus nördlich von Gut Ving steht auch noch da. | |
| 4 | 2020-12-12 15:38 | physi ♦47 | danke für die Überprüfung, da hab ich dann wohl nicht richtig aufgepasst.... | |
| 5 | 2020-12-12 16:22 | dieterdreist | Finde ich schon ein bisschen hart als Entschuldigung für das Löschen von Informationen. Im Zweifel sollte man alles was man sich nicht genau angesehen hat, einfach so lassen wie es andere eingetragen haben, davon ausgehend, dass die beim Eintragen eben durchaus richtig aufgepasst haben wer... | |
| 6 | 2020-12-13 05:43 | physi ♦47 | Ich habe meine fehlerhaften Änderungen korrigiert.Grußphysi | |
| 7 | 2020-12-13 09:02 | dieterdreist | Danke, auch fürs Teilnehmen an der Diskussion im dt. Forum | |
| 56143755 by physi @ 2018-02-07 09:55 | 1 | 2020-12-12 16:29 | dieterdreist | Changeset genannt in Diskussion um gelöschte Namen: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71409 |
| 59952924 by physi @ 2018-06-18 17:56 | 1 | 2020-12-12 16:28 | dieterdreist | Changeset genannt in Diskussion https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71409 |
| 60074630 by physi @ 2018-06-22 12:24 | 1 | 2020-12-12 16:27 | dieterdreist | Changeset genannt in Diskussion https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71409 |
| 94858083 by fkv @ 2020-11-26 20:04 | 1 | 2020-11-27 15:03 | dieterdreist | Hi, der Name Fugging ist ja noch future_name, aber den Straßennamen hast Du ganz gelöscht? |
| 2 | 2020-11-27 15:19 | fkv ♦585 | Den Straßennamen hab ich ganz gelöscht, weil er ganz falsch ist. In manchen, auch amtlichen, Datenbeständen wird als Straßenname defaultmäßig der Ortsname genommen, was in OSM natürlich kontraproduktiv ist. Diese falschen Straßennamen fluten aber immer wie... | |
| 3 | 2020-11-27 15:54 | clay_c ♦489 | Nach [1] wird das Umbenennen am 1/1/2021 wirksam. Sollte doch der alte Ortsname bis dahin bleiben?[1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/26/fugging-hell-tired-of-mockery-austrian-village-changes-name | |
| 4 | 2020-11-27 16:20 | fkv ♦585 | Siehe meinen ursprünglichen Changesetkommentar. Bis 1.1. ist nicht mehr lang, und jeder, der nach dem alten Ortsnamen sucht, findet ihn wegen old_name sowieso. Wenn du am 1.1. um 0:00 bereitstehst um die Änderung sekundengenau zu machen, dann bitte, nur zu. Aber bedenke, dass die Ände... | |
| 5 | 2020-11-27 20:09 | dieterdreist | ich weiß, dass andere DBs öfters die Ortsnamen in das Straßenfeld schreiben, weil sie das anders nicht abbilden können, aber hier gibt es eigentlich keinen Hinweis auf Import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43269170 | |
| 6 | 2020-11-27 23:28 | fkv ♦585 | Da gibt es aber auch keinen Hinweis auf Ortskenntnis. Die zwei Edits waren die einzigen in Österreich von diesem Ungarn, und der benutzte Editor, das oneway=no, die Anzahl seiner Edits bis dahin und seine Changesetbeschreibung lassen alle nicht darauf schließen, dass er wusste, was er tat... | |
| 7 | 2020-11-28 08:10 | dieterdreist | Du warst also auch nicht vor Ort? | |
| 8 | 2020-11-28 16:24 | fkv ♦585 | Nein. | |
| 9 | 2020-11-28 18:17 | dieterdreist | ich finde, auch wenn man den starken Verdacht hat (den ich im Übrigen teile), bevor man einen Namen von einem Objekt wo man nicht war löscht, wäre es angebracht, beim Ersteller nachzufragen. | |
| 10 | 2020-11-28 18:41 | fkv ♦585 | Bei einem systematischen Fehler, wo schon zigtausende falsche Namen importiert wurden, kann man nicht in jedem einzelnen Fall nachfragen. Das wäre ein Fulltimejob, für den der Sponsor fehlt, und am Ende würde so oder so die Korrektur stehen. | |
| 61262944 by Denis Reshetnikov @ 2018-08-01 12:55 | 1 | 2020-10-19 21:58 | dieterdreist | Hi, I have seen you added shop=mall to the Castel Romano Outlet near Rome, but this is not really a shopping mall (enclosed space, inside), it is many shops connected through "regular" streets (outside). |
| 91417698 by lorec10 @ 2020-09-24 08:20 | 1 | 2020-09-24 08:52 | lorec10 ♦7 | errata corrige: relation valid fino a prova contraria |
| 2 | 2020-09-24 10:04 | SekeRob ♦1,435 | Just an observation, no critique or contention: That seems to be a frequent issue at OSM, ... relations. Think that those who want to create the relation have to create a new one and tag them appropriately, rather than changing/deleting existing tags of which the person doing the relational work has... | |
| 3 | 2020-09-24 11:30 | sabas88 ♦196 | Grazie | |
| 4 | 2020-09-24 12:34 | lorec10 ♦7 | SekeRob, I’m sorry, I don’t get it... | |
| 5 | 2020-09-24 12:39 | SekeRob ♦1,435 | The relational routing is broken. Click on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/31311 and you'll see the subject section is MIA. | |
| 6 | 2020-09-24 12:43 | SekeRob ♦1,435 | Someone messing with tags as a result breaking a relation. | |
| 7 | 2020-09-24 12:43 | sabas88 ♦196 | And what's the "relation" between your relation and this relation? :/ | |
| 8 | 2020-09-24 13:40 | SekeRob ♦1,435 | Just my 2nd comment that landed in the wrong thread without a delete option, but there's a relation, those 'tags' I mentioned in my first comment and 3rd comment. Hands-off, unless "fino a prova contraria", and then, communicate first and not as has happened on the SS5, JDI ... | |
| 9 | 2020-10-19 17:12 | dieterdreist | Reckless action and pointless argument. If someone invents something and challenged for it, replies: prove to me that it doesn't exist, this is inverting the burden of proof. | |
| 92370489 by lorec10 @ 2020-10-12 18:30 | 1 | 2020-10-13 07:57 | Cascafico ♦577 | WAY: 813505885What is line=yes? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92370489 |
| 2 | 2020-10-19 17:02 | dieterdreist | Why have you been reinstalling the relation despite the open discussion on talk-it (which by the way did not really point towards undeleting the relation)?This is clearly incompatible with the data working group comment. | |
| 91786960 by MSa968 @ 2020-09-30 20:04 | 1 | 2020-10-06 22:11 | dieterdreist | Ciao MSa e benvenuto!Un'osservazione: Il tag "image" non dovrebbe contenere un'elaborato grafico come un biglietto da visita, ma piuttosto una fotografia dell'esterno del palazzo.Grazie,Martin |
| 91652683 by mcheck @ 2020-09-28 15:37 Active block | 1 | 2020-09-29 10:59 | dieterdreist | Ciao,non capisco questo way: osm.org/way/852453710mi puoi gentilmente spiegare dove lo hai visto? Su Esri World Imagery Clarity Beta non sembra ci sia un buco di queste dimensioni.Grazie,Martin |
| 91665260 by mcheck @ 2020-09-28 20:24 Active block | 1 | 2020-09-29 10:55 | dieterdreist | Ciao mcheck,questo sembrerebbe un import, giusto? |
| 89205076 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2020-08-10 14:47 | 1 | 2020-09-27 15:04 | dieterdreist | Congratulations for your 10.000th changeset! |
| 90871685 by woodpeck @ 2020-09-14 14:29 | 1 | 2020-09-15 07:01 | totera ♦286 | Hi Frederik, I think you have been badly informed about Italian geographical region, while a Wikipedia search could have been enough: it is the name commonly found in textbooks, encyclopedias, etc to refer to the land south of the Alpine watershed, which does not fully correspond with the borders of... |
| 2 | 2020-09-15 07:55 | sabas88 ♦196 | Hi Frederink, it needs only Wikipedia to check if accurate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_geographical_regionPerhaps someone should translate it on dewiki as well but I don't know german.... | |
| 3 | 2020-09-15 09:04 | woodpeck ♦2,431 | The fact that a Wikipedia entry exists for something does not mean that the thing itself exists! | |
| 4 | 2020-09-15 09:05 | woodpeck ♦2,431 | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Germanic_Reich <-- we wouldn't want to map that either | |
| 5 | 2020-09-15 09:19 | sabas88 ♦196 | Godwin's Law at the first repty? WowThat's a "political entity" (Q51335349 on wikidata) not a "geographical region" (Q82794 on wikidata) | |
| 6 | 2020-09-15 09:57 | dieterdreist | I agree with the deletion. Replying to @totera you wrote: "In the past irredentist movements that promoted the annexation of neighbouring regions to Italy have existed, but their claims were on ethnic and linguistic basis rather than geographic." -- claiming "italian geographical regi... | |
| 7 | 2020-09-23 21:23 | lorec10 ♦7 | Hi, I’m the original author of the relation, the “geographic region of Italy” is neither "an ill-defined historic boundary", neither "a right-wing political fantasy”, it is defined as the territory south of the main alpine drainage divide on the European contin... | |
| 8 | 2020-09-24 11:05 | dieterdreist | lorec, if you go by coast proximity, shouldn't the Sardegna be part of Tunisia then? Was Malta contained? What about Palagruža? | |
| 9 | 2020-09-24 11:28 | dieterdreist | talk-it is a mailing list for Italy. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it | |
| 10 | 2020-09-24 12:45 | lorec10 ♦7 | The island of Sardinia, the archipelago of Malta and the islands of Pelagosa are all part of the European continent and the closest European continental coasts to all those islands belong to the geographical region of Italy. | |
| 11 | 2020-09-24 13:24 | dieterdreist | if we agree on plate tectonics for determining the belonging, the eastern parts of Italy and significant parts of the po valley are geographically in Africa:http://www.raon.ch/images/edu/haz3/eu_Bruchzonen16001.gif | |
| 12 | 2020-09-24 13:27 | dieterdreist | https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placca_adriatica | |
| 13 | 2020-09-24 13:33 | lorec10 ♦7 | on a geological basis yes, not on a geographical basis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe | |
| 14 | 2020-09-24 13:43 | Fintocubano ♦5 | I would not deem the concept of *Geographic Region of Italy* as an 'ill-defined historic boundary'. I guess we need to look at three different kinds of definitions of *Geographic Region of Italy* to avoid confusion.The first definition - geological - is the one mapped in OSM: the orang... | |
| 15 | 2020-09-24 13:48 | sabas88 ♦196 | @lorec10 se vuoi iscriverti alla mailing list ma non sai come fare / non ne hai voglia (lo capisco :D) scrivimi pure un messaggio diretto, sono l'amministratore della lista@dieterdreist perché dobbiamo ridefinire cose per le quali ci sono esperti di settore?@all I suggest to make... | |
| 16 | 2020-09-24 13:48 | lorec10 ♦7 | It does allow geographical/physical relations: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3870917 | |
| 17 | 2020-09-24 13:49 | lorec10 ♦7 | mi sono iscritto ma non ho capito come si fa a rispondere al thread | |
| 18 | 2020-09-24 13:53 | dieterdreist | @sabas88 a cosa ti riferisci? | |
| 19 | 2020-10-19 17:42 | woodpeck ♦2,431 | I have removed the region again in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92722694 and will issue account blocks for anyone who reinstates it without first achieving a consensus on talk-it that it is a thing that should be mapped. DWG Ticket#2020101910000354 | |
| 52342202 by nyuriks @ 2017-09-25 01:23 | 1 | 2019-09-02 09:54 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,666 | Is there a wiki page for that mechanical edit? It is a good idea to link it in changeset tags or in a changeset comment |
| 2 | 2019-11-10 21:04 | aquarix ♦115 | I have only check a handful items from the list. But what I can say if the linked Wikipedia article refers not to the OSM item itself but to a brand or a company related to the item this was mostly not respected during the edit. So I also would treat this as a mechanical edit. I only saw two items t... | |
| 3 | 2020-09-23 09:57 | dieterdreist | Clearly a mechanical edit. Unfortunately it introduced or reinforced quite some errors (in the end, a wikidata item is not the same as a wikipedia article, and it can well be possible that a wikipedia article link is a suitable fit for an OSM item while the related (to the article) wikidata object i... | |
| 90978611 by artem95vlasovets @ 2020-09-16 10:12 | 1 | 2020-09-18 10:11 | whb ♦614 | Guten Tag,was soll denn hier falsch gewesen sein?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/338507616/history |
| 2 | 2020-09-18 15:51 | artem95vlasovets ♦52 | Hi! Thank you for your message. I made a mistake and already fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91121332. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-19 11:34 | Jakob48 ♦66 | Hallo,zur Info. Alle von mir im Süden Baden-Württemberg überprüften wikidata/wikipedia Informationen waren korrekt und wurden von mir wieder hergestellt (partial revert CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91065307). | |
| 4 | 2020-09-20 11:18 | limes11 ♦892 | Wouldn’t it make more sense to just cleanly revert this CS? I checked a few changes, some are fine, others are not. Or do we have a volunteer to go through 800 wiki pages one-by-one?This very much looks like a mechanical edit, I highly doubt the user checked all this by hand. Was it announ... | |
| 5 | 2020-09-21 13:31 | artem95vlasovets ♦52 | Hi limes11! I deleted wikidata that doesn't match the places where It was used. I announced in telegram chat - https://t.me/OSM_de/41579. There is also a link to the table where were validated all these places. If there are changes that you do not agree with, please write to me. I will be happy... | |
| 6 | 2020-09-21 14:49 | skyper ♦871 | Where is the discussion in advance of your edit? As all mechanical edits have to be discussed, in advance, please, revert completly and start a discussion about your intentionThanks skyper. | |
| 7 | 2020-09-21 15:33 | dieterdreist | +1 to revert because undocumented and undiscussed automated edit | |
| 8 | 2020-09-21 17:03 | EinKonstanzer ♦135 | This is a strong violation of the automated edits guidline (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct) Your are working for MapBox, right? As a long term participant in the OSM surroundings I expect from MapBox and their staff to be familiar with OSM and the guidlines and d... | |
| 9 | 2020-09-21 20:02 | limes11 ♦892 | Following the comments and the forum discussion https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=70663I reverted this changeset for the lack of prior discussion through the appropriate channels. The guideline link was posted above. In fact, the forum is a good platform to discuss the intenti... | |
| 10 | 2020-09-22 09:26 | skyper ♦871 | Oh, wo ist den die Identifizierung, dass dies ein Änderungssatz von einem angestellten Mapbox Mitarbeiter ist? Wo ist der HashTag des Task.Bitte weise, deinen Chef auf die Richtlinien hin.Bis wann kann ich mit den Hashtags rechnen? | |
| 11 | 2020-09-22 09:32 | skyper ♦871 | Wo ist die offene Kommunikationsplattform?Private Mails und Telegram does not count! | |
| 81870022 by Frugol @ 2020-03-06 13:23 | 1 | 2020-09-04 17:53 | dieterdreist | ciao, ho visto che hai taggato questo nodo con barrier=yeshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7271935670significa che non si può oltrepassare la recinzione su quei percorsi oppure c'è un apertura? Nel primo caso metterei barrier=fence sul nodo (oppure taglierei vicino alla rece... |
| 2 | 2020-09-14 09:46 | dieterdreist | Hi, I have noticed you have tagged some traffic lights controlled highway=crossing nodes with crossing=marked. Please use a more specific tag, e.g. crossing=traffic_lights andcrossing=zebraThank you.Martin | |
| 75448118 by Michele Aquilani @ 2019-10-09 09:05 | 1 | 2019-11-18 15:54 | dieterdreist | Qui mi sembra ci siano ancora semafori, oppure sono stati rimossi recentemente?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/414139428 |
| 2 | 2020-09-04 16:49 | dieterdreist | ci sono altri semafori spariti in questo changeset, per esempio node 566522680, node 1130864337 | |
| 90267918 by Fluffy89502 @ 2020-09-01 23:48 | 1 | 2020-09-02 20:34 | Jakob48 ♦66 | Revertiert mit changeset #90321833. Die A4 südlich von Schaffhausen ist nur eine Schnellstrasse und keine Autobahn. |
| 2 | 2020-09-02 21:20 | dieterdreist | Hi Fluffy, it seems your edits in the area were not accurate, could you please explain where your information comes from, or which sources you used? Thank you | |
| 85498404 by Città di Palmi @ 2020-05-20 11:59 | 1 | 2020-09-02 14:52 | dieterdreist | Ciao Città di Palmi,ho notato che hai creato questo landuse=residential https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806402228 che contiene di tutto e di più (qualsiasi landuse, compreso strade ecc.). Mentre non è "vietato" procedere in questa maniera (cominciare grezzo e poi a... |
| 88588990 by RubenKelevra @ 2020-07-27 23:47 | 1 | 2020-08-18 14:16 | dieterdreist | Das ist ziemlich klar ein nicht abgestimmter automatischer Edit. Weitere Infos hier: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=798173#p798173 |
| 59265986 by gluca @ 2018-05-25 10:13 | 1 | 2020-08-08 23:04 | dieterdreist | Ciao Gluca, ho visto che hai rimosso il tag natural=spring da Node: Fonte di Santo Stefano (742648750)Non è una sorgente?Un saluto Martin |
| 80091221 by mcheck @ 2020-01-26 08:30 Active block | 1 | 2020-08-04 20:46 | dieterdreist | non capisco perché hai cancellato la versione 6 di Piazzale Aldo Moro per poi ricreare un’altra versione, ed hai cancellato anche i stabilimenti perenni sulla spiaggia per ricrearne degli stabilimenti anonimi, perché? |
| 2 | 2020-08-04 20:47 | dieterdreist | scusa, ho ritrovato i stabilimenti, mi ero sbagliato nella posizione | |
| 60306138 by aceman444 @ 2018-06-30 16:44 | 1 | 2020-08-02 21:10 | dieterdreist | Hi, I just noticed you surveyed in 2018 that here are no traffic lights: node 5730658123I thought I remember that there are, can you please confirm? Thank you, Martin |
| 2 | 2020-08-02 21:46 | aceman444 ♦2,578 | Hi, I have put source=bing on the crossing, while often you can't see traffic lights on bing, so it may be a mistake that I marked it as uncontrolled. I can't resurvey the spot any time soon, so you can fix it up if you remember better. | |
| 3 | 2020-08-02 22:00 | dieterdreist | all right, I’ll fix it. Please do not add crossing details like crossing=* from aerial imagery, it is not possible to distinguish traffic light controlled crossings from zebra crossings in Rome, because all have zebra markings. Thank you, Martin | |
| 4 | 2020-08-02 22:12 | aceman444 ♦2,578 | Correct, I may have tried to add the zebra and added crossing=uncontrolled too by mistake. Thanks | |
| 81614503 by Frugol @ 2020-02-29 08:12 | 1 | 2020-07-28 10:50 | dieterdreist | Hi, I have seen that you are adding footway=sidewalk tags to (virtual) footway crossing ways (the ways that connect sidewalks at crossings). Please use footway=crossing for these footways (together with highway=footway). Thank you. |
| 66852693 by GBAB @ 2019-02-02 10:34 | 1 | 2020-07-13 07:21 | dieterdreist | Hi, you wrote you had performed a survey to map this. Can you please tell me more? It does not occur to me that there is an obelisk at this spot, even less that there are names in all those languages. Seems like there is really nothing there. |
| 2 | 2020-07-16 07:01 | GBAB ♦101 | Lieber Dieter,since it was about a year and a half ago, I don't really remember what I have actually done there. As far as the obelisk is concerned, what I have done is that I changed its tags (not being a historic=monument). Apparently, I didn't check its existence believing those mappi... | |
| 3 | 2020-07-17 08:37 | dieterdreist | The reason why I was asking is that I do not believe there is an obelisk there, for sure there isn't an ancient monumental obelisk there (maybe a modern small version), but from looking at the tags there is eventually something like a memorial (plate) with an inscription that refers to an obeli... | |
| 4 | 2020-07-20 09:21 | GBAB ♦101 | Yes, probably, you have right. Now, I have made a small investigation and found that there *was* apparently an obelisk there but it isn't:http://members.ziggo.nl/bfac.berndsen/19geschiedenisV.htmLook for "Afbeelding 12: Piazza dei Protomartiri Romani"If you look for pictures on ... | |
| 5 | 2020-07-22 12:20 | dieterdreist | OK, thank you, I have removed it now.Have fun mapping! | |
| 57802441 by rusefkuma @ 2018-04-04 12:49 Active block | 1 | 2020-07-13 07:28 | dieterdreist | Hi rusefkuma, I have noticed you have added an new obelisk here which I am curious to find out more about. Did you take a picture? I have not heard about it yet. Thank you,Martin |
| 2 | 2020-07-14 08:13 | dieterdreist | Can you describe from where you copied the inscription text? I will probably delete this obelisk duplicate at the wrong position, but would try to save useful tags by transferring them to the correct object, if they can be confirmed. | |
| 3 | 2020-07-17 08:40 | dieterdreist | Hi rusefkuma, can you recall why you added this obelisk and how it did look like? Maybe it was just a confusion and is refering to the monumental Lateran Obelisk in the centre of St. Peter's square? In this case I suggest to remove this object. Please reply, if you do not reply I will remove th... | |
| 64278938 by pizzaiolo @ 2018-11-08 02:13 | 1 | 2020-07-13 07:26 | dieterdreist | Hi Pizzaiolo, I have noticed you have confirmed the phantom obelisk here. Can you please explain what your edit refers to? At first glance it seems someone was adding wikidata tags without any verification to phantom objects which really are already mapped at their actual location. |
| 2 | 2020-07-14 00:30 | pizzaiolo ♦17 | Hi! Feel free to undo my edits if you see fit! | |
| 3 | 2020-07-14 08:10 | dieterdreist | I did not check "your edits" of course, I just noticed you have added wikidata tags to a supposed phantom obelisk, where the actual obelisk is already mapped 200 meters to the east at its actual position. There is no point in doing "manual verification" of automatically adding wi... | |
| 87889486 by homy @ 2020-07-12 21:10 | 1 | 2020-07-13 09:39 | dieterdreist | see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=794408 |
| 75431986 by TWHB @ 2019-10-08 21:50 | 1 | 2020-07-04 16:13 | dieterdreist | in this changeset there were added "parts" of the citywalls that are not there any more, or that even have never been there (e.g. the pyramid of Cestius was itself part of the walls, there was not a wall going through it and there is not now). Also adjacent there was one the Aurelian walls... |
| 2 | 2020-07-04 16:17 | dieterdreist | The Aurelian walls are not a "site", they are city walls, i.e. it is a generally linear feature, and the remains are interrupted, it is quite different to a "site". https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10129640 | |
| 3 | 2020-07-12 18:15 | TWHB ♦11 | I have changed the pyramid and wall next to it, however I do believe that the relation is a "site" see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historical_Objects/Relations | |
| 4 | 2020-07-13 07:11 | dieterdreist | Thank you for fixing the error you had introduced at the pyramid. From looking at the historical_objects page in the wiki that you linked, I did not read it as if site relations were ok for city walls, rather the "type=collection" type seems appropriate, although the page also clearly stat... | |
| 87490131 by Adamant1 @ 2020-07-03 08:11 | 1 | 2020-07-05 14:02 | dieterdreist | this is supposedly part of an undiscussed concealed automated edit which retagged several amenity=hospice |
| 2 | 2020-07-05 14:08 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Weird, because no one ever messaged me about it. They were free to if there was a problem with any of them. Usually it's obligatory to contact someone before reverting them. So, I'm a little disappointed and irritated about it. Also, I did all those edits by hand over the course of a f... | |
| 3 | 2020-07-05 14:10 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Were you the one that did the revert and was it discussed anywhere? I assume were since you know about it and are commenting on my changesets. Plus, we just got in that little tiff about similar things in the name-index. So, this seems a tad like petty backhanded pay back on your part. | |
| 4 | 2020-07-05 14:48 | dieterdreist | I did not revert any of this as I am not at the desk currently. This is neither a payback for any other discussion we have had. I just noticed that usage of the tag went down and that of social facility went up, I looked at random objects and saw it was you making this globally. | |
| 5 | 2020-07-05 15:25 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | For info I changed 3 hospices in the east mids of England (that I originally surveyed on the ground) back to their original tagging - I don't know if that's the "revert" being talked about? | |
| 87490238 by Adamant1 @ 2020-07-03 08:13 | 1 | 2020-07-05 14:02 | dieterdreist | this is supposedly part of an undiscussed concealed automated edit which retagged several amenity=hospice |
| 87490565 by Adamant1 @ 2020-07-03 08:19 | 1 | 2020-07-05 14:01 | dieterdreist | this is supposedly part of an undiscussed concealed automated edit which retagged several amenity=hospice |
| 87490634 by Adamant1 @ 2020-07-03 08:20 | 1 | 2020-07-05 14:01 | dieterdreist | this is supposedly part of an undiscussed concealed automated edit which retagged several amenity=hospice |
| 81580509 by bvivi @ 2020-02-28 08:34 Active block | 1 | 2020-06-22 15:31 | dieterdreist | Hi, I have seen you have added the tags "brand:en=Popular Bank of Sandrio" to a bank of "Banca populare di Sondrio". Can you please explain what your sources are? I did not find a brand of this name. |
| 2 | 2020-06-25 19:58 | dieterdreist | Hi bvivi, as you have not replied and the people that contributed to the discussion on the Itailan mailing list proposed to remove the superfluous tags, I have now done so. Please be careful when adding stuff semiautomatically. The reason it is not done automatically is that we are relying on the lo... | |
| 87081842 by Indiana Off My Mind @ 2020-06-24 11:03 | 1 | 2020-06-25 13:05 | geri-oc ♦497 | Ich bitte diese Änderungen zu unterlassen. node mit Adressen an Eingängen zu verschieben bringt eine Qualitätssteigerung. Deine Änderungen sind nicht erwünscht und du kannst gern im Forum über einen Revert deiner CS diskutieren:https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopi... |
| 2 | 2020-06-25 13:26 | geow ♦447 | Hi "Indiana Off My Mind", thanks for your contribution, IMHO your edits are OK and welcome, as they comply with the 1:1-Rule ->https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_elementHowever, there are also mappers that prefer address information as a separate node at the en... | |
| 3 | 2020-06-25 13:39 | geow ♦447 | @geri-oc, wenn ich es richtig überblicke, waren keine Adressknoten an Eingängen kartiert, sondern innerhalb des building als separater node:https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=87081842 | |
| 4 | 2020-06-25 14:50 | dieterdreist | “Deine Änderungen sind nicht erwünscht” trifft es nicht, es wird diskutiert, ob das Sinn macht oder nicht, und es gibt gute Argumente dass es mindestens keine Verschlechterung ist. Freifliegende Nodes innerhalb von Gebäuden machen keinen Sinn und sind sicherlich nicht bess... | |
| 80681207 by geozeisig @ 2020-02-07 08:52 | 1 | 2020-06-04 08:22 | dieterdreist | Die weltberühmte Schinkelsche Bauakademie nebst ausführlichem tagging, Verweisen zu Wikipedia und Wikidata, Beschreibung als Gerüst, in Version13, wurde hier zu building=yes umgetaggt, Absicht? |
| 2 | 2020-06-05 05:24 | geozeisig ♦224 | Von dem Gerüst steht nicht mehr, nur noch die eine Ecke die zur Demonstration gebaut wurde. Vielleicht wird sie ja wieder aufgebaut. Dann tragen wir es ein. | |
| 84488376 by gigi2037 @ 2020-05-01 18:39 | 1 | 2020-05-05 14:24 | dieterdreist | undiscussed import |
| 2 | 2020-05-05 20:42 | gigi2037 ♦19 | perchè mi da probema i numeri con cap 24128 non riesco a capire | |
| 62876119 by dieterdreist @ 2018-09-24 11:06 | 1 | 2018-09-24 11:16 | dktue ♦208 | Willkommen zurück in Tübingen! :-) |
| 2 | 2018-09-24 11:26 | dieterdreist | Danke, aber der Edit bezieht sich nur auf allgemeines Wissen, er bezieht sich nicht auf einen aktuellen survey ;-) | |
| 3 | 2018-09-24 12:07 | dktue ♦208 | Und mein Kommentar bezieht sich auf den Wunsch, dass Du als Power-Mapper wieder "daheim" mappst. :-) | |
| 4 | 2018-12-30 10:06 | ajf3934221 ♦147 | hallo, ja und wie ischt des jetzt mit dem fixme auf dem bereich von dieterdreist: "isn't this actually mixed landuse, with retail, commercial and residential at the same amount?"also dieser Aussage kann man wohl schon so zustimmen würde ich sagen. Oder gibt es andere Meinunge... | |
| 5 | 2020-05-03 05:39 | ajf3934221 ♦147 | Halllllöle! Jetzt hätte ich nochmal eine Frage: und zwar bzgl: Knoten: Neckartor (3363574827)wiso ist hier place=locality besser als neigbhbourhood? ich dachte locality sei ein unbewohntes Gewann?Grüßle,Andy | |
| 6 | 2020-05-03 09:41 | dieterdreist | locality ist wenn das Toponym sich nicht auf eine Siedlung oder einen Siedlungsteil bezieht. Hier würde ich das eher so sehen, man könnte aber evtl. auch für neighbourhood argumentieren | |
| 35541496 by atpl_pilot @ 2015-11-23 23:41 | 1 | 2015-11-24 00:40 | atpl_pilot ♦71 | Es sind noch einige Lücken übriggeblieben, die werde ich auch noch schließen. Bitte beachtet in diesem Zusammenhang das zukünfige tagging Schema unter http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_areaDanke |
| 2 | 2020-03-26 14:00 | dieterdreist | Vielen Dank fürs Teilen des Monsters! Ich wollte anregen, den Gehweg zur Straße zu zählen und den landuse erst an der Grundstückgrenze (Hausaußenseite) anfangen zu lassen. Auf dem Gehweg wohnt ja niemand (und das ist auch, wie es üblicherweise gesehen wird, Gehweg als... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-26 14:39 | atpl_pilot ♦71 | Hallo Martin,ich fine eine Karte ist in erster Linie zur Orientierung da. Für mich ist überall wo Menschen leben oder im Stadtgebiet laufen können, das Landuse = residental (verfeinert durch spezielle Nutzung wie commercial etc).Straße ist für mich und alle die ich ke... | |
| 4 | 2020-03-26 15:02 | dieterdreist | Hallo, das ging ja schnell. Ich bin der gleichen Meinung, dass eine Karte zur Orientierung dienen können muss.Zur Frage, ob landuse=residential überflüssig wäre, wenn das Haus schon als Wohntypologie getaggt ist: im Prinzip dort, wo das Gebäude das gesamte Grundst&uu... | |
| 82458116 by Rodrigo Oooooo @ 2020-03-21 12:04 | 1 | 2020-03-21 16:18 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | Hello and welcome to OSM!Please observe that we generally do not add temporary data. The German community has agreed on not adding any COVID-19 specific data to objects in OSM (please refer to the forum thread https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68908) as things are changing too qui... |
| 2 | 2020-03-21 16:33 | Rodrigo Oooooo ♦1 | Thank you for the valuable feedback! I am currently exploring how COVID-19-related updates of local businesses can be visualized / shared. I think, then crawling of data from other data sources and mapping the data to OpenStreetMap points is a better way to go. So no modification to OpenStreetMap da... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-21 17:33 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | Your're welcome :-) The OSM community (which means mainly people doing this in their spare time) is trying to keep the quality high over a long time. Google which (unlike OSM) is funded by people paying for being displayed on some map or search result is offering their customers (!) to adju... | |
| 4 | 2020-03-23 10:05 | dieterdreist | Thank you for your edit. Those who criticize this as very short term "temporary" seem to have a crystal sphere. We do indeed map things that are temporarily changed, provided it is more than very short term. | |
| 5 | 2020-03-28 08:33 | Vinber ♦802 | Hi, Hello, in France, we have decided to use a specific label to facilitate the cleaning of the database. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours:covid19.It's only to add a point of vue.Regards | |
| 82257513 by Lgh-OSM-Editor @ 2020-03-16 12:38 | 1 | 2020-03-16 14:30 | OSM_RogerWilco ♦724 | Hallo Lgh-OSM-Editor,willkommen bei OSM!Warum hast Du die Wege gelöscht?Viele GrüßeRoger Wilco |
| 2 | 2020-03-18 13:36 | Nakaner-repair ♦8,261 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82349775 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 82257513 because the comment does not provide a sufficient explanation for the deletion but leads to the suspicion that the deletion was done for political reasons. Please comment... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-18 14:58 | dieterdreist | Wer neu zu OpenStreetMap kommt und als erste Aktion ne Menge Sachen löscht, in deren Erfassung stundenlange wenn nicht tagelange Arbeit steckt, noch dazuhin mit einem so mageren Kommentar, der stellt sich sozusagen selbst unter Vandalismusverdacht. Trotzdem, willkommen und freut mich, dass Du O... | |
| 4 | 2020-03-18 14:59 | dieterdreist | sorry, das tagelang nehme ich zurück ;-) | |
| 5 | 2020-03-19 08:33 | Lgh-OSM-Editor ♦1 | Erstmal vielen Dank dass Ihr Euch gemeldet habt.Sorry, wenn das Löschen der Wege für Irritationen gesorgt hat, das sollte definitiv kein Vandalismus sein!Wie ich bereits kurz kommentiert hatte, sind die Wege aus folgendem Grund gelöscht worden:Die Bereiche, in denen sich die... | |
| 6 | 2020-03-19 10:29 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | Hallo Lgh-OSM-Editor, danke für die Erklärung. In OSM gilt es nicht als sinnvoll, vorhandene Wege zu löschen, und zwar deshalb, weil der nächste Mapper, der da vorbeikommt, sie möglicherweise wieder einträgt (in dem Glauben, die fehlen noch). Klüger ist es, das OSM... | |
| 7 | 2020-03-19 12:51 | OSM_RogerWilco ♦724 | Das Betreten ist weiterhin erlaubt (siehe auch https://www.langenhagen.de/index.phtml?object=tx,1620.19.1&ModID=7&FID=1620.6865.1). Daher sollten vorhandene Wege auch nicht gelöscht werden, sondern nur richtig beschrieben werden, wie kreuzschnabel schon schrieb. Gierfür gibt es meh... | |
| 8 | 2020-03-19 13:57 | Lgh-OSM-Editor ♦1 | Okay, danke für die Hilfestellung.Dann ist also das Tag abandoned:highway=track (bzw. path oder footway) zu setzen, oder?Und ich würde mich bzgl. der genauen Abgrenzungen des Naturwaldes (Teile des Stadtparks) erkundigen.Die Bänke sollen wohl noch zurückgebaut werden. Wie i... | |
| 9 | 2020-03-19 14:38 | OSM_RogerWilco ♦724 | Hat sich denn der Zustand der Wege inzwischen tatsächlich geändert? Wenn nein, würde ich sie nicht ändern. Und wenn, würde ich eher mit Tags wie surface, width, tracktype und smothness den Zustand des Weges beschreiben.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface... | |
| 10 | 2020-03-19 15:12 | TS-R ♦11 | Hallo lgh-osm-editor,grundsätzlich kannst du bei entfernten Elementen die lifecycle prefix nutzen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix. Eine angebaute Bank könnte somit als removed:amenity=bench getaggt werden.Bei einer Sitzbank die komplett entfernt wurde und di... | |
| 11 | 2020-03-19 15:13 | TS-R ♦11 | Korrektur: Das sollte natürlich abgebaut heißen. | |
| 12 | 2020-03-19 15:53 | dieterdreist | Hallo Lgh, und nochmal willkommen. Sorry für den Vandalismusverdacht, wir sehen halt öfter mal Edits nach dem ähnlichen Schema, und oft sind sie nicht in guter Absicht (manchmal aber natürlich schon).Bei aufgegebenen Wegen ist abandoned:highway=<Wegtyp> ein guter tag, ins... | |
| 81891098 by jucepi @ 2020-03-07 06:03 | 1 | 2020-03-10 06:24 | geri-oc ♦497 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:addr |
| 2 | 2020-03-10 10:38 | fx99 ♦127 | This Changeset and others were reverted,see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68868 | |
| 3 | 2020-03-11 09:57 | dieterdreist | Automatic translation, English original belowHola jucepi, gracias por contribuir a OpenStreetMap. Por favor, tened cuidado antes de quitar cosas del mapa. Echa un vistazo a "todas las etiquetas" si estás usando el iD Editor. Escribe al usuario que ha creado los objetos que no enti... | |
| 79735364 by Alessandro Antonelli @ 2020-01-18 16:32 | 1 | 2020-01-24 17:31 | dieterdreist | Ciao Alessandro, ti volevo far sapere che in questo changeset hai rotto la relazione della foresta (prolungando il "fence" si è distrutto il multipoligono). Ammetto che questo multipoligono è veramente esagerato, sarebbe da spezzare in parti più piccoli, innanzitutto ... |
| 2 | 2020-02-04 11:00 | Alessandro Antonelli ♦2 | Ciao Martin, scusa se rispondo in ritardo. Effettivamente mi ero reso conto di aver fatto qualche pasticcio con la foresta, solo che mi sembrava di aver annullato l'errore prima di salvare (ma evidentemente poi lo ho reintrodotto...). Per cui ti ringrazio moltissimo della correzione, purtroppo ... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-04 11:56 | dieterdreist | Ciao Alessandro,grazie per la tua risposta. Nessun problema, come ti avevo scritto, l'ho già ripristinato. Ti propongo di dare un'occhiata anche a JOSM (l'altro principale editore di OSM), che certe cose sono più facili lì (all'inizio può sembrare ... | |
| 77187177 by gpstracks @ 2019-11-17 12:24 | 1 | 2020-02-02 19:42 | dieterdreist | Bravo, bellissimo lavoro! |
| 2 | 2020-02-03 20:34 | gpstracks ♦97 | Grazie.E' stato un vero piacere :) | |
| 70361590 by Michele Aquilani @ 2019-05-17 15:01 | 1 | 2020-02-01 15:40 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele, ti segnalo che in questo changeset hai distrutto la relazione amministrativa "Acilia Sud" (probabilmente quando hai unito la rotatoria 126957331). Ti invito di usare JOSM che molto probabilmente non sarebbe successo ;-) |
| 77868705 by Dino Michelini @ 2019-12-03 10:34 | 1 | 2020-01-26 15:59 | dieterdreist | Ciao Dino, ho visto che hai aggiunto admin_level=8 alla Zona La Giustiniana, penso sia troppo basso (sarebbe in conflitto con i Municipi che loro sono al 10). In un'altro caso ho messo 11: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10319358 e suggerisco anche qui 11. Poi farei 2 oggetti distinti pe... |
| 2 | 2020-01-28 08:56 | Dino Michelini ♦321 | Ciao Martin, mi sembra di ricordare che questa relazione (Zona LIV La Giustiniana) non si riferiva al municipio Municipio Roma XV, di cui esiste una relazione con admin_level=10, ma solo al quartiere della Giustiniana. Circa l'uso di admin_level=11 non saprei se sia corretto utilizzarlo: nella ... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-28 10:11 | dieterdreist | Place=quarter si può applicare alle relazioni del tipo multipolygon, sono equiparati ai poligoni, "on relation" si riferisce a altri tipi di relazione. Se vedi in taginfo, a parte i nodi, sono per un terzo relazioni: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/place=quarterIo sono a fa... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-28 10:17 | dieterdreist | Ho fatto un esempio qui:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10319358https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5460386 | |
| 5 | 2020-01-28 11:35 | Dino Michelini ♦321 | A questo punto si dovrebbe aggiornare la pagina https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dquarter... | |
| 6 | 2020-01-28 11:50 | dieterdreist | perché? Già specifica "on area=yes", e che non si tratta di entità amministrative. | |
| 7 | 2020-01-28 11:52 | dieterdreist | ammetto, ho modificato anche la Giustiniana, perché sicuramente admin_level=8 non era giusto (8 sono i comuni, e 10 i municipi, quindi anche se fosse una entità amministrativa, dovrebbe stare sotto il livello 10) | |
| 8 | 2020-01-28 12:36 | Dino Michelini ♦321 | mi riferisco al Template:ValueDescription parametro |onRelation= circa l'utilizzo con "relation" posto a (?) | |
| 9 | 2020-01-28 12:45 | dieterdreist | come avevo scritto sopra, le relazioni del tipo multipolygon e boundary sono contenute in "area" | |
| 52151597 by mat135 @ 2017-09-18 17:13 | 1 | 2020-01-28 08:11 | dieterdreist | Hi Mat135, I just noticed you added outdoor seating=no to the Gelateria Fassi. Are you sure? I have not been there recently, but for many years they did provide outdoor seating in the courtyard, at least in the warm period of the year. |
| 21748075 by Gehrke @ 2014-04-17 12:03 | 1 | 2020-01-27 18:26 | dieterdreist | great stuff! |
| 49835295 by lorec10 @ 2017-06-26 12:40 | 1 | 2017-09-11 18:13 | fx99 ♦127 | Hi, what is the sense of this relation:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7357659 ?It started as boundary=historic: Kingdom of Italy (1918 -1947) , now it is boundary=geographic?? It is not identical to the political boundary of Italy.Besides this, it is mis-spelled, and contains a a loop ... |
| 2 | 2020-01-27 08:29 | dieterdreist | I agree with fx99, this relation does not seem to represent something verifiable on the ground and on close inspection seems to be drawn arbitrarily. E.g. it includes the territorial waters of current Italy, according to 20th century legislation, how would this qualify for "geographic"?I... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-27 09:06 | lorec10 ♦7 | Salve dieterdreist, premetto che ho effettuato questo gruppo di modifiche già un po’ di tempo fa, perciò non ricordo esattamente la successione dei cambiamenti apportati, inoltre ero ancora inesperto nell’uso di OSM, mi scuso quindi per eventuali procedure “non ortodo... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-27 09:22 | dieterdreist | Salve Lorec10,grazie per risposta veloce. Generalmente, in OSM cerchiamo di mappare la situazione attuale. I confini "storici" sono inseriti in casi dove c'è ancora qualche effetto attuale del confine. Ovviamente, ogni situazione storica avrà anche qualche effetto co... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-27 09:28 | lorec10 ♦7 | scusi, sta parlando di questa relazione: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7358831 ? Io intendevo questa | |
| 6 | 2020-01-27 09:50 | dieterdreist | Io parlo di questa:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7357659(è l'unica relazione di questo changeset) | |
| 7 | 2020-01-27 10:05 | lorec10 ♦7 | sì, ma i percorsi modificati si riferiscono alla relazione https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7358831, come le ho detto mio malgrado c’è stata molta confusione da parte mia dovuta alla mia inesperienza. Per quanto riguarda la relazione https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7... | |
| 8 | 2020-01-27 13:14 | dieterdreist | si, ho capito che viene dichiarata "geografica", ma come ho cercato di spiegare sopra, in questo contesto, la geografia senza la politica e cultura non esiste. Per esempio l'Istrioto viene oramai visto come appartenente al gruppo delle lingue romanze balcaniche e non più a quel... | |
| 9 | 2020-01-29 18:50 | lorec10 ♦7 | Per quanto riguarda la definizione di regione geografica italiana può leggere l’articolo di wikipedia allegato. Per semplificare, il concetto include il territorio versante nel mediterraneo tra i due punti in cui il moderno confine italiano tocca la linea costiera, più tutte le i... | |
| 39001087 by caterpillar64 @ 2016-04-30 15:19 | 1 | 2020-01-13 11:15 | dieterdreist | Hi Caterpillar64, I noticed you have added "name=Babbo Natale" for this path. As this sounds somehow unusual for a path name, I am curious to find out where the name comes from. Would you please be so kind to explain where you have got it from?Thank you,Martin |
| 2 | 2020-01-20 17:57 | caterpillar64 ♦1 | Hello Martin.There’s a wood panel at the beginning of the downhill path, with that name written on.That’s the reason I’ve reported that name.Goodbye. Caterpillar64 | |
| 3 | 2020-01-21 08:00 | dieterdreist | Hello Caterpillar64, thank you for replying. I had the suspicion that this was indeed the reason, so it is clear now.Thanks again,Martin | |
| 79339842 by Otzitello @ 2020-01-08 12:55 | 1 | 2020-01-08 18:33 | dieterdreist | Hi, can you explain what you are doing? Are you aware you are adding live (bogus) information to a community created project? Please stop. |
| 2 | 2020-01-09 19:46 | Alecs01 ♦1,423 | I believe he is just trying to add addresses as nodes, they may be retained as useful info, deleting amenity=shower and name=. Maps.me does not allow you to create a node with just an addr: tag, it is not the first time I see something like that. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-09 23:09 | dieterdreist | Maybe we should point him/her to a better editing software like josm, gomap!! or vespucci | |
| 42412697 by select @ 2016-09-24 21:34 | 1 | 2019-12-16 17:58 | dieterdreist | Ciao Select,I just noticed you renamed a part of Lungotevere Dante to Via Mario Ageno in this changeset. Was it on purpose? The changeset comment is not really comprehensive, but it doesn't seem to suggest that renaming was within the intended scope of the changeset.https://www.openstreet... |
| 2 | 2019-12-16 20:13 | Alecs01 ♦1,423 | Martin, il nome di quella strada lo avevi cambiato tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289793780/history lui è solo il solito vandalo che modifica tutte le strade unclassified in residential e cancella tutti i telefoni che incontra (qua sono cinque), come ha fatto qua e in chissà quan... | |
| 3 | 2019-12-16 20:39 | dieterdreist | Grazie Alecs, mammamia, trovo i miei errori di anni da o_O | |
| 4 | 2019-12-17 10:52 | dieterdreist | Dopo aver indagato meglio ricordo che avevo trovato un relativo cartello che sembrava indicare Via Maria Ageno anche da quella parte, ma la realtà è probabilmente che qualcuno ha girato il cartello (era un cartello ad angolo) | |
| 74401051 by dktue @ 2019-09-12 16:42 | 1 | 2019-12-16 09:11 | dieterdreist | Hi dktue, ja, der Georgsbrunnen ist natürlich Teil des Hoizmarkts (place=square), aber er ist natürlich nicht Teil der Fußgängerfläche highway=pedestrian, area=yes. Auch Treppen sind üblicherweise nicht mit highway=pedestrian getaggt. |
| 78220825 by badenk @ 2019-12-10 17:55 | 1 | 2019-12-12 11:25 | dieterdreist | Hi badenk,I have seen you have added this giant circle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/754056333But there are no tags that describe the object, just a name. Can you please explain what this is?Thank youMartin |
| 2 | 2019-12-12 13:34 | badenk ♦47 | Hi Martin:This circle is used a guide to help align the adjoining railway route, the name is the radius.thanks,Baden | |
| 3 | 2019-12-12 14:56 | dieterdreist | Thank you for the reply. This was also the most probable hypothese we had gotten so far. Good work ;-)CheersMartin | |
| 41250473 by fayor @ 2016-08-05 01:34 | 1 | 2017-07-06 11:22 | dieterdreist | looks like an undiscussed mechanical edit. Deletes 767 ways in one changeset, many of which in mature versions (e.g. v19!). |
| 2 | 2017-07-06 11:24 | dieterdreist | There even a way in version 57 deleted by this. Please be more respectful with other people's work and modify rather than delete / recreate! E.g. way/15564717 | |
| 3 | 2018-10-20 21:36 | rene78 ♦447 | Not sure whether this reversion was a wise one. In my opinion all "Zonas" of Rome (e.g. this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5319470) should have admin_level=10. All municipalities (e.g. this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1459589) admin_level=8. This changeset rem... | |
| 4 | 2018-10-21 08:56 | Alecs01 ♦1,423 | Don't know what happened in this changeset, but current tagging is fine. I believe the name "Municipio" may be misleading, those are indeed municipal subdivisions, admin_level=10 is correct according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative&... | |
| 5 | 2018-10-22 22:17 | dieterdreist | Yes, for this particular changeset it is too late for a revert, what is unfortunate because of the many deleted objects. | |
| 6 | 2019-11-18 21:44 | dieterdreist | This is still tagged as place=quarter, and the admin_level and boundary=administrative is missing. I am also quite sure this should be an administrative boundary. Fayor, can you explain why you removed the admin tags? | |
| 7 | 2019-11-18 21:48 | rene78 ♦447 | He never participated in the discussion. Would be surprised, if he replies this time. Maybe doesn't speak English? | |
| 8 | 2019-11-18 22:39 | dieterdreist | Fayor, sembra che questo sia un confine amministrativo (quartiere di Roma), vorrei sapere se fosse stato intenzionale togliere i tag boundary=administrative e admin_level=10. Grazie, Martin | |
| 9 | 2019-11-19 14:38 | fayor ♦125 | Assolutamente intenzionale, quello non è un confine amministrativo | |
| 10 | 2019-11-20 09:24 | dieterdreist | Rimango ogni volta perplesso quando degli utenti cambiano unilateralmente e senza confrontrarsi con nessuno la mappatura che esisteva da anni. In questo caso si tratta di una "zona urbanistica", no? Queste sono suddivisioni dei Municipi, creati per la pianificazione e gestione del territ... | |
| 11 | 2019-11-20 15:32 | fayor ♦125 | Come ho già detto, quello NON E' un confine amministrativo. L'ha chiaramente spiegato anche alecs nel suo commento, che ti riporto: "current tagging is fine. I believe the name "Municipio" may be misleading, those are indeed municipal subdivisions, admin_level=10 is... | |
| 12 | 2019-11-20 16:22 | dieterdreist | Certamente non parliamo di un municipio, io parlavo del Quartiere Ostiense https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5460386 (i changeset così grandi come questo sono difficili da commentare e da visionare, per questo si consiglia di caricare le modifiche in maniera più incrementale).S... | |
| 13 | 2019-11-20 16:49 | fayor ♦125 | Non si tratta di una zona urbanistica ma di una zona toponomastica: le zone toponomastiche sono (cito da Wikipedia) 116, organizzate in quattro tipologie: 22 RIONI nel centro storico, 35 QUARTIERI densamente abitati, 6 SUBURBI adiacenti ai quartieri e 53 ZONE nel resto del territorio comunale.Qu... | |
| 14 | 2019-11-20 17:31 | dieterdreist | ho aggiunto una relazione per la zona urbanistica, e modificato il Quartiere da quarter in suburb (il senso di place in OSM non corrisponde all'uso delle parole italiane "Quartiere" e "Suburbio" a Roma, suburb e quarter in OSM vanno per grandezza, mentre a Roma è il g... | |
| 15 | 2019-11-20 17:38 | dieterdreist | per le zone toponomastiche c'era storicamente nel tagging di OSM soltanto place=suburb, dopo tanto è seguito place=neighbourhood, ed io ho aggiunto place=quarter in mezzo tra grande e piccolo (è un sistema gerarchico). Sono tag generici per toponimi "in città". No... | |
| 16 | 2019-11-20 18:00 | fayor ♦125 | Sembra di parlare col muro, non capisci o fingi di non capire le spiegazioni che ti vengono date.Dici di "rimanere perplesso" quando qualcuno cambia qualcosa senza confrontarsi e poi fai la stessa cosa.Hai fatto delle modifiche totalmente errate e non te ne rendi conto. Bravo. | |
| 17 | 2019-11-20 23:00 | dieterdreist | ti invito a segnalarmi gli errori nel changeset dove li ho fatto, oppure in mailing list, per quanto può essere bello discutere tutto qui, gli edits nuovi non c’entrano più qui.Se non era chiaro dagli ultimi commenti miei, sono comunque d’accordo di togliere boundary=admi... | |
| 76870156 by SerV @ 2019-11-10 14:33 | 1 | 2019-11-18 15:48 | dieterdreist | Hi, I have noticed you have been changing the specific tag crossing=zebra to the unspecific crossing=marked. Can you explain why you have done it? It seems to loose information, doesn't it? |
| 2 | 2019-11-18 19:51 | Alecs01 ♦1,423 | Many users are doing the same thing, because this is what iD suggests right nowhttp://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Zebra-crossings-being-lost-in-iD-how-to-respond-td5950318.htmlhttps://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/6962 | |
| 3 | 2019-11-18 19:58 | dieterdreist | I am aware that iD suggests to do this, but they say people are actively deciding for the change, and I wanted to see if this is actually the case. IMHO it is a bad choice because the new tag is less specific | |
| 4 | 2019-11-18 22:17 | SerV ♦1 | Hi, I normally used to change crossing=zebra for crossing=marked as iD suggests plus cossing_ref=zebra to not loss information.Also, note that in a lot of places people used to tag as crossing=zebra even there is no zebra markings.I think the crossing=marked + crossing_ref=zebra schema is more s... | |
| 5 | 2019-11-18 22:25 | dieterdreist | I agree that tagging crossing=zebra where there are no zebra markings is wrong. My suggestion would be to fix it where there aren't zebra markings, not to change the tag where there are actually zebra markings.Would you say that crossing=marked is applicable to places where the marked crossin... | |
| 6 | 2019-11-18 22:33 | SerV ♦1 | Wouldn't that be crossing=traffic_signals?And if there is zebra markins complement it with the crossing_ref=zebra? | |
| 7 | 2019-11-18 22:35 | dieterdreist | It definitely could be tagged as you propose, what I wanted to know if crossing=marked would be an alternative tagging for it? What about crossings with zebra markings but no vertical signage, legally these aren't zebra crossings in Italy if they are not in proximity to a road junction. I thoug... | |
| 8 | 2019-11-18 22:53 | SerV ♦1 | Theoretically it can be an alternative but I understand that the traffic signals are always more important than the floor markings, so crossing=traffic_signals will be better.I don't understand a lot the other case you expose. If I get what you say, I think you are right. It would be crossing... | |
| 9 | 2019-11-18 23:07 | dieterdreist | I am unsure about crossing_ref, it isn’t really defined/documented, the wiki says its meaning is countryspecific and is about a “crossing type “which is somehow contradicted by the usage of crossing_ref in combination with signal controlled crossings | |
| 10 | 2019-11-18 23:29 | SerV ♦1 | Yeah, it's a little confusing. For the moment I will not modify any cross again, let's see if it is clarified in the future.Also note how in the wiki is used different types of crossing=* with the crossing_ref=*https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing#Examples | |
| 11 | 2019-11-19 09:06 | dieterdreist | Thank you for the productive dialogue, let's see if we can get this sorted out in the future... | |
| 12 | 2019-11-19 10:37 | SerV ♦1 | Thank you, too. | |
| 69533308 by Michele Aquilani @ 2019-04-24 16:33 | 1 | 2019-11-16 18:22 | dieterdreist | Ciao Michele,in questo changeset hai messo tutto un fosso sotto terra, ma non è probabile, perché ci sono anche ponti.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450758287#map=14/41.7817/12.5330Un saluto Martin |
| 73443878 by alpenmurmeli @ 2019-08-17 14:15 | 1 | 2019-11-15 12:26 | dieterdreist | Hi, you have added a lot of parts of the Vatican Museums as museum, for example the "Sala della biga", which in reality is part of the museum "Museo Pio Clementino", as is the "Galleria dei Candalabri" etc.See here for reference: http://www.museivaticani.va/content/mu... |
| 2 | 2019-11-15 12:33 | dieterdreist | There is also the removal of this way: 214196250 which seems incorrect, although I am not completely sure. Can you explain why it was removed?Generally, I would not say your edit was malicious of course, just that it seems incorrect tagging to use the tourism=museum tag for what essentially is jus... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-16 10:25 | alpenmurmeli ♦3 | feel free to retag or remove them but I think it would be helpful for visitors to know where these places are, as the map given at visit is not very clear.Please explain why removal of 214196250 seems incorrect. Unfortunately openstreetmap does not indicate which one it was. If I knew which one it... | |
| 4 | 2019-11-16 11:36 | dieterdreist | I agree that these are useful to map, but they aren’t museums, they are parts of museums. Maybe indoor mapping could represent them appropriately.The way was probably on a different level, you can see it if you look at your changeset in OSMCha | |
| 5 | 2019-11-30 09:44 | alpenmurmeli ♦3 | way 214196250 has been restored by dieterdreist. Thank you! | |
| 76533537 by lorenzog89 @ 2019-11-02 17:32 | 1 | 2019-11-15 13:21 | dieterdreist | Ciao Lorenzo,ti chiedo cortesemente di utilizzare commenti di changeset più utili. "correzioni varie" non dice niente. Se cancelli degli oggetti sarebbe da scrivere perché, tipo "cancellati campi sportivi perché non ci sono più" o qualcosa di simile.... |
| 2 | 2019-11-15 13:26 | lorenzog89 ♦2 | Ciao, scusami la prossima volta sarò più preciso. Comunque è un campo temporaneo, allestito solo per gli internazionali di tennis. | |
| 3 | 2019-11-15 16:16 | dieterdreist | grazie mille della risposta, e anche grazie del tuo contributo.Ti avevo scritto perché ho notato che sei molto attivo e che "correzioni varie" è il tuo commento preferito in assoluto, ma dice (troppo) poco.In ogni caso, buona mappatura!Un salutoMartin | |
| 4 | 2019-11-15 16:28 | lorenzog89 ♦2 | Figurati, se vuoi sentiamoci, per scambiare qualche opinione. | |
| 5 | 2019-11-16 08:15 | dieterdreist | Ci incontriamo ogni ultimo lunedì del mese a Roma, se ti va (e soprattutto se ci sei a Roma), ci farebbe piacere: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rome/Incontro | |
| 6 | 2019-11-18 17:22 | lorenzog89 ♦2 | Io sono di Pistoia, un po lontanino. Aggiungimi su skype lorenzoguidotti | |
| 76688829 by airali96 @ 2019-11-06 09:48 | 1 | 2019-11-07 09:14 | GCerretani ♦7 | modifiche apparentemente un po' a caso. inseriti casini in piazza del campo a siena. |
| 2 | 2019-11-15 13:04 | dieterdreist | Innanzitutto, benvenuto tra i mappatori, e non ti scoraggiare, ho visto che hai richiesto un review. Non ho tempo per guardare il tutto ;-) ma sarebbe meglio caricare le modifiche in maniera più atomica (non caricare piccole modifiche in città diverse con lo stesso caricamento). Poi ... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-15 13:10 | dieterdreist | Per esempio quando cancelli una fontana, questo meriterebbe un caricamento isolato, dove nel commento scrivi perché (tipo: cancellato fontana perché smantellata). https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/679547869(non lo so se esiste o meno questa fontana, casomai se ti serv... | |
| 4 | 2019-11-15 13:16 | dieterdreist | Un altra cosa ancora: hai aggiunto "historic=monument" ad una statua: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6950719793questo tag descrive una struttura grande e accessibile all'interno. Il wiki di OSM ti può aiutare nella verifica che i tag proposti dal editore iD sono giusti:... | |
| 5 | 2019-11-15 13:18 | dieterdreist | access=yes è inutile su un parco giocchi, è implicito:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680364396 | |
| 50465007 by aldoct @ 2017-07-21 17:57 | 1 | 2019-11-15 12:56 | dieterdreist | Ho notato che hai modificato alcuni motor_vehicle=private in motor_vehicle=no, cosa mi sembra molto improbabile, visto che parliamo di strade su una piazza pubblica. Al solito ci sono autorizzati (polizia ecc.) che possono usare queste strade. Access=no è appropriato quando _nessuno_ po'... |
| 76525727 by marcoSt @ 2019-11-02 11:42 | 1 | 2019-11-04 10:16 | dieterdreist | grazie Marco, ma hai cambiato tutta la sagoma, in realtà cosa ho inteso era di splittare l'edificio in 2 parti, una rimaneva a 7 piani, e l'altra a 4. Non lo potevo fare in mobilità, per questo ho creato la nota. |
| 2 | 2019-11-04 17:28 | marcoSt ♦118 | Oh, scusa, era stato un malinteso da parte mia. Pensavo si riferisse a tutta la casa. Bene, può succedere :-) | |
| 3 | 2019-11-04 18:29 | dieterdreist | si, non ti preoccupare, l'ho già fissato. In generale bisogna sempre stare un po' attenti con le note, ho visto spesso che non erano vere (tipo: "non ha mai esistito o non c'è più" viene spesso segnalato da utenti che in realtà si sbagliano e guar... | |
| 56387886 by Michi_ @ 2018-02-15 15:41 | 1 | 2019-11-02 01:03 | dieterdreist | Ciao, segnalo questa nota (non mia):https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1010720"Per il mapping di corridoi si usa higway=corridor.Per tutte le informazioni necessarie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_Mapping " |
| 55099425 by Giardia @ 2018-01-02 12:34 | 1 | 2019-10-23 10:47 | dieterdreist | Ciao Giardia, secondo un altro utente, il parcheggio bici in realtà è un parcheggio motorini / moto per 9 moto. Confermi? |
| 2 | 2019-10-23 11:11 | Giardia ♦6 | Bisognerebbe controllare sul posto, in due anni possono essere cambiate le cose... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-23 12:18 | dieterdreist | infatti | |
| 4 | 2019-10-29 16:49 | Giardia ♦6 | oggi passavo da quelle parti e ho dato una controllata, è ancora un parcheggio per bici con tanto di cartello. | |
| 5 | 2019-10-30 09:20 | dieterdreist | per caso hai anche visto questa fontanella se era un nasone?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5316361874Perché abbiamo da qualche tempo stabilito il tag fountain=nasone per i nasoni, e sarebbe da aggiungere se si. | |
| 6 | 2019-10-30 09:21 | dieterdreist | stavo per togliere il fixme e ho visto che l'avevi già fatto, grazie! | |
| 61405553 by Netadmap @ 2018-08-06 13:54 | 1 | 2019-10-23 10:37 | dieterdreist | Hi Netadmap, I just discovered you entered a water tower here. Please do not add "the closest possible match" objects via Maps.me. Their editor has only a very limited set of features, and you would end up adding errors (like here), only add things that they actually have provided for.Th... |
| 46834029 by dieterdreist @ 2017-03-14 09:03 | 1 | 2019-10-16 12:46 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 ♦363 | Hi, For Finnegan Irish Pub, I added `theme=irish`, to say that it's an irish pub. Although I've never heard of the `restaurant:type:it` tag, that's interestinghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75778594 |
| 2 | 2019-10-17 16:12 | dieterdreist | we have been meeting there with our local group, but frankly I did not pay attention whether they are Irish or British. Judging by the name, if they were British, it would be a perfect cover up. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-17 16:14 | dieterdreist | the restaurant:type:it is an old idea of mine to distinguish common local typologies of places where you can get something to eat. E.g. it is suitable to distinguish an osteria from a ristorante or a trattoria. It is a list of autodeclared (by the owner of the feature / the signage) typologies. | |
| 4 | 2019-10-17 16:16 | dieterdreist | and it uses the words they use themselves (i.e. local language), semicolon separated, and without capitalization and spaces become underscores (i.e. there is some normalization, but very few, not changing words) | |
| 5 | 2019-10-18 07:53 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 ♦363 | Gotcha. 🙂 It sounds like a good idea. Apparently there's some form of Italian restaurant certification http://www.italiantaste-certification.com/criteria/ | |
| 6 | 2019-10-18 10:54 | dieterdreist | It's not something I have heard of in Italy, it is probably not so important here, because Italians will want to decide for themselves whether a restaurant is "truly Italian", but it could help tourists or in other countries. As a first indication: if there are "Spaghetti Bolog... | |
| 66206535 by vohokudul @ 2019-01-10 19:31 Active block | 1 | 2019-10-04 09:00 | dieterdreist | Hi, I have noticed you have changed the road classification of the lateral road of Via Cristoforo Columbo from unclassified to residential. It is not a residential part of this road because nobody is living there, it is a part between the arterial road and a parking, sports pitches and a university ... |
| 2 | 2019-10-04 09:01 | dieterdreist | You do not have to act, I have already changed it back.Cheers,Martin | |
| 14106234 by GeofixFe @ 2012-12-01 00:26 | 1 | 2019-09-30 10:50 | dieterdreist | Hi, I noticed you added the Reginna torrent in the underground/tunnel part as width=5meters, can you recall where this information comes from? |
| 73922468 by dieterdreist @ 2019-08-30 13:10 | 1 | 2019-09-14 12:15 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Thanks :) I was going to write on talk to do a mechanical edit when I noticed that their numbers had melted. do you plan to do the few remaining countries ?Regards,Marc |
| 2 | 2019-09-14 13:28 | dieterdreist | frankly no. I did some countries I was aware of with small numbers of objects and then couldn't stop so I went on, but most of them weren't strictly mechanical edits because I have looked individually at all results. This was more time consuming then I originally wanted (because of web res... | |
| 54453871 by FrViPofm @ 2017-12-08 09:47 | 1 | 2019-09-14 13:18 | dieterdreist | Hi Brother Vincent, I have noticed you are using the building=monastery tag as the main tag for monasteries (together with community tags etc.). May I suggest to use amenity=monastery on the whole grounds (excluding fields, woods and meadows, but including gardens and other areas around the building... |
| 2 | 2019-09-14 22:19 | FrViPofm ♦11 | It sounds good... Go on ! | |
| 73704991 by Janjko @ 2019-08-24 21:05 | 1 | 2019-09-12 13:29 | dieterdreist | Hi Janjko, I have noticed that you remove name tags from highway objects when there is a place=square object around, please do not do this. There is no inheritance from outer way tags to the relation, and while in theory it would be possible to inherit from place objects, for the current state it ba... |
| 2 | 2019-09-12 13:32 | dieterdreist | sorry for the noise, I take this back, as the highways (linear) still have their names it is probably not much damage (it could be an issue for pedestrian navigation if they route around the corners and there will be no name). | |
| 3 | 2019-09-14 08:03 | Janjko ♦86 | I remember never removing the way names, but I might have removed the pedestrian area one. You're right, those might be used as ways in the future. | |
| 54802650 by gionax @ 2017-12-21 03:16 Active block | 1 | 2019-09-03 10:27 | dieterdreist | Hi, I just noticed you have moved the centre of Rome in this edit. Can you explain for what reason? There were good arguments for the former position, some years ago I have written about this in a diary post: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dieterdreist/diary/40727Cheers,dD |
| 73871932 by LorenzoPesci @ 2019-08-29 09:01 | 1 | 2019-08-29 11:09 | dieterdreist | grazie per aver rimesso il duomo. Sarebbe ancora meglio ripristinare (revert) per non perdere lo storico (si fa per esempio con il plugin revert di josm) |
| 2 | 2019-08-29 11:15 | LorenzoPesci ♦64 | Non ho la possibilità di usare Josm purtroppo. Inoltre credo che ci siamo imprecisioni nell'allineamento degli oggetti dovute a Bing. | |
| 73782458 by jackthebest @ 2019-08-27 07:49 | 1 | 2019-08-27 17:26 | dieterdreist | Hi, it looks as if you added the junction roundabout tag to a lot of circular road crossings. How did you verify these are actually roundabouts? |
| 2 | 2019-08-27 18:05 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | I just did some spot checks and came across https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/685668359 which MOST CERTAINLY is NOT a roundabout, it’s just a turning loop. So, this CS should be reverted. Please do NOT add arbitrary tags just to eliminate Osmose warnings unless you know from local knowledge th... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-28 08:17 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73827670 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed and buggy mechanical edit of suspected roundabouts | |
| 4 | 2019-08-28 08:21 | woodpeck ♦2,431 | Dear jackthebest, please refrain from making wide-ranging edits like that without looking at the individual object you're changing. Also, please choose better changeset comments - "fix" is not helpful, it doesn't tell people what your intention is. For example I looked at another... | |
| 5 | 2019-08-28 10:06 | jackthebest ♦5 | Sorry, the roundabout edit must be reverted! I haven't performer any checks on this. It's the result of an automated process test uploaded by mistake.My bad. | |
| 36654620 by dieterdreist @ 2016-01-18 11:49 | 1 | 2019-08-22 08:47 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,666 | Why you added fixme to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4525461/history#map=19/41.90224/12.45692 rather than simply remove tagging for renderer? |
| 2 | 2019-08-22 11:26 | dieterdreist | I can’t recall, sorry | |
| 73202807 by malaerba @ 2019-08-09 17:47 | 1 | 2019-08-17 21:34 | dieterdreist | this is an semiautomatic undiscussed edit and should be reverted. |
| 2 | 2019-08-17 21:51 | malaerba ♦1 | I do not know what you intend for semiautomatic edit, I did manually, and I was an activist in this kind of places. For sure they are not shops, you can not buy anything, you can not pay to fix your bike, but you find activists that help you to repair your bicycle. Or you can do it yourself. Sometim... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-17 22:03 | dieterdreist | Hi malaerba, thank you for replying. I agree shop is suboptimal, we should develop a dedicated tag for this kind of feature. They are not bicycle repair stations because that's a different thing, see the description and picture herehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_re... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-17 22:15 | dieterdreist | Semiautomated because you did a search and replace on a series of features. If you want to do this (basically change the established way of tagging in an area), you should discuss it before with the local community. I have now seen you just started to edit in OSM, welcome :)In case you are not a... | |
| 5 | 2019-08-17 22:16 | malaerba ♦1 | In Italian they are ciclofficine (singular ciclofficina), but sometimes shops use the same word. That's the way I did not change all these poi in Rome. In English often, but not always and not everywhere they are called bikekitchens.French veloatelier and ciclotaller in Spanish. Often the adj... | |
| 6 | 2019-08-17 22:18 | dieterdreist | In general I agree that shop may not be the best solution, but the bike repair stations are a fundamentally different thing, they are some tools on a chain, publicly accessible at any time, typically. The ideal solution has yet to be proposed | |
| 7 | 2019-08-17 22:21 | malaerba ♦1 | OK, understood. And I agree. :) | |
| 8 | 2019-08-17 22:29 | dieterdreist | Si , conosco bene le ciclofficine, ci sono stato svariate volte e ho degli amici che le gestiscono. Vivo a Roma. | |
| 68725671 by Micha Buettner @ 2019-03-31 14:10 | 1 | 2019-07-30 00:49 | dieterdreist | stimmt da war ein Fehler, aber im Namen, nicht in der Position. Bitte nicht leichtfertig Daten loeschen, lieber erstmal die Bearbeiter kontaktieren... |
| 68725788 by Micha Buettner @ 2019-03-31 14:14 | 1 | 2019-07-30 00:38 | dieterdreist | Hi, I have noticed you changed the name of the park, what are your sources? |
| 2 | 2019-07-30 00:44 | dieterdreist | uebrigens, es gibt dort selbstverstaendlich Katakomben, daher der Name, nur sind die nicht oeffentlich zugaenglich.Gruss,Martin | |
| 71762733 by wambacher @ 2019-06-30 18:42 | 1 | 2019-07-02 09:01 | waldhans ♦203 | Tut mir leid: die "Alte Süchtelner Landstr." ist der ganz offizielle Name. Das wurde auch deutlich markiert:note = the abbreviation of the street name is correct and official official_name = Alte Süchtelner Landstr. official_name:de = Alte Süchtelner Landstr.\... |
| 2 | 2019-07-02 10:16 | wambacher ♦435 | OSM stellt kein Kataster da. Und Abkürzungen - wo auch immer sie her kommen sollte - sind bei OSM nicht erwünscht: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29Siehe auch das Forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66578 wo ich das hier zur D... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-02 10:45 | dieterdreist | sofern die Abkürzungen offiziell sind (d.h. im Benennungsakt der zuständigen Stellen, meist Gemeinderatsbeschluss, so aufgeführt sind), wäre official_name der richtige tag dafür. Im Zweifel lieber eine Variante mehr mappen, als sich einen Editwar über den Wert desselben... | |
| 4 | 2019-07-02 12:55 | waldhans ♦203 | OSM sollte aber die Realität abbilden, nicht irgendwelche Wunschträume. Wir hatten die Diskussion über diese Straße seit mehrere Jahren, die Stadt ändert den Namen nicht. Und dann ist die Wirklichkeit doch höher einzustufen als irgendwelche Wünsche von OSM.off... | |
| 5 | 2019-07-02 13:53 | dieterdreist | welche "offiziellen Daten"? Davon gibt es oft viele, entscheidend ist, dass es die relevanten offiziellen Daten sind, d.h. aus dem Akt der Straßenbenennung (normalerweise Stadtratsbeschluss). Alles andere ist dann davon abgeschrieben und ggf. transportieren sich Fehler und Ungenauigk... | |
| 6 | 2019-07-02 15:04 | waldhans ♦203 | Zu der Frage "Offiziell"ja, wird in allen Amtsblättern so verwendet. Soweit ich weiß, wollte das Vermessungsamt Kreis Viersen eine Änderung, da sich auch ihre Geo-Software sie Schreibweise bemängelt. Aber die Stadt Viersen bleibt bisher hart. Online lässt sich... | |
| 7 | 2019-07-02 17:54 | dieterdreist | Hallo Kurt Waldhans,Überlebenswichtig ist das natürlich nicht für mich, wenn es Dir Spaß macht beim Amt zu recherchieren dann würde mich das Ergebnis interessieren, aber wenn das eher eine Pflicht wäre dann lass es sein.mit freundlichem Gruß,Martin Koppen... | |
| 71121661 by fayor @ 2019-06-11 00:24 | 1 | 2019-06-23 21:36 | dieterdreist | Ciao Fayor, ho notato che hai messo il nome facendo riferimento a una delibera del 2014. Mi potresti cortesemente indicare la fonte di questa modifica (dove la posso trovare)?Grazie |
| 2 | 2019-06-24 14:16 | fayor ♦125 | Ciao, non so a quale nome ti riferisci, per questo changeset ho visionato più di dieci delibere a partire dal 2012, di cui circa la metà del 2014. In ogni caso le trovi tutte sul sito del Comune di Comiso. | |
| 3 | 2019-07-01 11:22 | dieterdreist | grazie per la risposta e scusami che ti rispondo tardi (sono stato fuori sede). Sarebbe veramente utilissimo spezzare gli edit secondo le fonti, così si potrebbe tenere traccia precisa delle modifiche e anche anni dopo qualcuno potrebbe verificare il tutto con facilità.Per i nomi far... | |
| 4 | 2019-07-01 21:29 | fayor ♦125 | Ho messo numero e anno delle delibere in tutte le strade che hanno cambiato nome, così chiunque può verificare eventuali inesattezze.Ti rispondo su Via Novella Parigini (way 473905479 che hai citato): con la delibera n. 13 del 2014 il comune di Comiso ha nominato questo tratto di s... | |
| 5 | 2019-07-02 00:01 | dieterdreist | grazie, chiedo sinceramente scusa per la parola “approssimativo”. In effetti mi sembra un buon lavoro, a parte i nomi tolti alla rotatoria (metterei lo stesso nome della via che continua).Ciao Martin | |
| 54825455 by ssav1977 @ 2017-12-21 20:37 | 1 | 2019-06-21 16:00 | dieterdreist | Hi, I noticed you have remove the tag from the park relation object which declares the kind of relation (type=multipolygon). Was this on purpose?Best regards,Martin |
| 62249485 by dktue @ 2018-09-03 14:19 | 1 | 2019-06-21 09:19 | dieterdreist | Hi DK,habe gesehen dass Du amenity=hospital von der Nervenklinik entfernt hast, ich würde das dranlassen (auf dem Gesamtgelände der Klinik). Es gibt zwar auch Kliniken Tal, aber das bedeutet nicht dass die Nervenklinik nicht auch ein Krankenhaus (oder evtl eine Klinik) ist. |
| 2 | 2019-06-21 12:51 | dktue ♦208 | Ich habe es bisher immer so gehandhabt: Das Gelände ist amenity=hospital und die Gebäude darauf building=hospital. So verfahre ich auch mit Schulen und Feuerwachen. Passt das in diesem Fall auch? | |
| 3 | 2019-06-21 14:59 | dieterdreist | ja, so handhabe ich das auch. Evtl. ist mir das amenity=hospital am Geländer hier entgangen (weil OverpassAPI nicht funktioniert gerade)? | |
| 71294702 by Mannivu @ 2019-06-16 07:41 | 1 | 2019-06-19 16:24 | dieterdreist | Hello, I have noticed you have added an undocumented tag (crossing=marked). Is there a reason you were not using one of the established tags like crossing=uncontrolled, crossing=zebra etc.? |
| 2 | 2019-06-19 16:34 | Mannivu ♦215 | Yes. Recently, using ID editor I've seen that the ID editor validator marks "crossing=zebra" as "Deprecated" tag and suggests "crossing=marked", so I've started using this kind of tag instead of "zebra" | |
| 3 | 2019-06-19 19:22 | dieterdreist | Hi Mannivu, thank you for replying so fast, I just wanted to make you aware there is currently some discussion about iD sometimes not reflecting community consensus, often deliberately, here is a page in the wiki recently set up https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Controversial_DecisionsThere... | |
| 4 | 2019-06-19 19:50 | Mannivu ♦215 | Thank you for warning me. In the future I will use "zebra" for crossing. | |
| 70690458 by MLaure42 @ 2019-05-28 10:11 | 1 | 2019-06-04 11:47 | dieterdreist | Hi, I have noticed you were using very unusual tagging on this gate. Please use access tags to tag the accessibility and do not abuse names for it. The name tag is only for names. You have also added a tourist information point on this gate. This is very unusual, and my guess is you did not intend t... |