| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59012511 by André Da Silva | 1 | 2018-05-16 11:18:34 UTC | Stereo | Welcome! There’s certainly enough to do in Esch. You can square buildings after drawing them by hitting ’S’. There’s a short video at http://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/. Happy mapping! Guillaume |
| 59012275 by Stijn Bossuyt | 1 | 2018-05-16 10:50:29 UTC | Stereo | Hi Stijn! I removed the airfield there a few months back because, as far as I can tell, it isn’t being used anymore. Am I mistaken? |
| 2 | 2018-05-17 08:44:30 UTC | Stijn Bossuyt | Hi Stereo. that exactly the reason I called it "Former". the site of the touristic service of Mullerthal still mentions it, the site of the cluw however puts it now just across the border in France in Zoutphen. However constantly refering to Luxembourgish regulations. | |
| 50689549 by wilda69 | 1 | 2017-07-30 11:25:32 UTC | Stereo | As far as I know it’s only temporarily during the construction that this is going to be rerouted. I’ll try to remember to check when the construction is done. |
| 2 | 2017-07-30 11:33:57 UTC | wilda69 | You are correct. I saw that the notices say that the basin d'orage should be completed by "September 2016!" Maybe they should change it to 2018. The deviation for the PC2 is however clearly marked | |
| 3 | 2018-05-09 12:12:39 UTC | dmlu | Hi, is there a reason why you mapped a part of the way as "Rue de la Barrière; Am Bongert"? From the official dataset, the housenumber 36 belongs to Rue de la Barrière, while 78 belongs to "Am Bongert". | |
| 4 | 2018-05-11 14:20:37 UTC | Stereo | Rue de la barrière used to go south over the pétrusse where the PC1 is now. I've corrected the cut-off to the intersection. | |
| 58594535 by marc_gerges | 1 | 2018-05-02 08:40:47 UTC | Stereo | Hah! Hi Marc, what are you trying to route? |
| 58119182 by chachas | 1 | 2018-04-16 13:42:18 UTC | SHARCRASH | Hello! Don't put bicycle=no as this restricts all kinds of bicycle, MTB also but obvisouly MTB can ride on those tracks. This breaks also third party services for planning tours. I'm going to correct your tags. |
| 2 | 2018-04-16 13:44:33 UTC | SHARCRASH | Likesie putting the opposite biycle=yes suggets that all kinds of bicycles can ride on the tracks but obviously road bicycles cannot. :) | |
| 3 | 2018-04-16 13:44:54 UTC | SHARCRASH | Likewise putting the opposite* | |
| 4 | 2018-04-17 06:40:53 UTC | Stereo | bicycle=* is about whether it’s legal to ride a bicycle somewhere. Whether it’s a good idea or not is something that’s best left to the smoothness, tracktype and surface tags, which have been mapped very well here. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-18 08:07:43 UTC | SHARCRASH | I know Stereo, but Chachas had put 2 days ago bicycle=no on a way which has the PC1 cycling route here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144874726/history and he commented that "the way is not adapted for road bikes". This suggests that he is misusing the tag bicycle=*, not ME, i just fol... | |
| 58144449 by chachas | 1 | 2018-04-16 20:37:18 UTC | Stereo | Hallo chachas, wilkommen auf OSM! bicycle=yes und foot=yes sind eigentlich auf solche tracks implizit und nicht nötig. Dein taggen von surface und smoothness sind genügend und perfekt. Viel Spaß beim mappen :) |
| 57528768 by jotes | 1 | 2018-03-26 13:21:12 UTC | Stereo | Hello, welcome to osm! If firefighters are allowed to use that path, you can add the emergency=yes tag to it. Happy mapping :) |
| 57320518 by AVL_Teix_Ga | 1 | 2018-03-19 15:05:25 UTC | Stereo | Moien! Do kéint villäicht nach building=yes agedroe ginn, dann taucht et och als Gebei op. |
| 56929440 by AVL_FLI_KA | 1 | 2018-03-06 10:18:23 UTC | Stereo | https://twitter.com/drobaux/status/962749642210463744 , also kann een och domat hëllefe Liewe retten :) |
| 2 | 2018-03-06 11:38:34 UTC | AVL_FLI_KA | Staark :) dann drohen mer och zu sou wichtegen Saachen bei. | |
| 56576320 by SHARCRASH | 1 | 2018-02-22 15:08:54 UTC | Stereo | The surface=cobblestone tag can probably be improved. |
| 56085459 by mjlux | 1 | 2018-02-05 14:33:53 UTC | Stereo | Moien a wëlkomm op OpenStreetMap,Ech froe mech, wou s du déi Nimm fonnt hues? Esou eng Quell hunn ech laang gesicht.Bescht Gréiss an happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 2 | 2018-02-05 15:05:35 UTC | mjlux | Alles op der lëtzebuergescher a franséischer Wikipedia fonnt, z.B. https://lb.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arelerland , https://lb.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gouvy asw.Happy mapping! :) | |
| 3 | 2018-02-05 18:05:21 UTC | Stereo | Leider därfe mir net einfach esou aus Wikipedia kopéieren, kuck https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia | |
| 4 | 2018-02-07 12:09:41 UTC | mjlux | Merci fir de Link. Déi Nimm stinn och esou am "Luxemburger Wörterbuch". | |
| 46991276 by foxandpotatoes | 1 | 2018-01-09 23:11:22 UTC | Stereo | Hah, you found imagery from 1971 to use? How cool. |
| 52993866 by freeclimber | 1 | 2018-01-09 21:31:26 UTC | Stereo | Hello, vill Gléck fir 2018! Kann et sin, dat déng Orthophotoen decaléiert sin? |
| 55042158 by petz | 1 | 2018-01-09 14:47:03 UTC | althio | Bonjour,L'adresse indiquée utilise addr:unit qui est très rare au Luxembourg par rapport à addr:housenumberPouvons-nous vérifier ? |
| 2 | 2018-01-09 15:17:43 UTC | Stereo | En effet, c'est le numéro de maison, et pas l'unité, qui n'existe pas ici. J'ai corrigé. | |
| 54984124 by Stereo | 1 | 2017-12-30 19:19:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way, it got two strange tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549560168Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-08 04:03:10 UTC | Stereo | Indeed, thanks Jan! I've fixed it. | |
| 55137555 by CarKe6298 | 1 | 2018-01-04 17:35:57 UTC | Stereo | Hallo (Moien?) CarKe6298! Ich weiss nicht genau, was du da machen wolltest, aber es scheint nicht geklappt zu haben :). Die Grenze zwischen den Gemeinden Sanem und Esch ist auf jedem Fall schon vom Kadaster importiert worden, hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/407473https://www.ope... |
| 55144555 by florian_g | 1 | 2018-01-04 13:06:11 UTC | Stereo | Quel beau travail! Attention, comme en France, le cadastre n'est pas toujours la source la source la plus juste. Tu connais le plugin https://github.com/JOSM/areaselector ? |
| 54847595 by XY22 | 1 | 2017-12-22 23:09:30 UTC | Stereo | I love how this is now perfectly mapped on OSM, and other maps don't even have the construction site! |
| 2 | 2017-12-23 09:34:21 UTC | XY22 | Thank you for your comment.Schéi Chrëschtdeeg | |
| 54533836 by wilda69 | 1 | 2017-12-12 18:20:36 UTC | Stereo | Highway=virtual isn't going to route either! This is something that the routers have to fix themselves. I know graphhopper are working on it. |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 18:37:01 UTC | wilda69 | Actually it will, if you use the following code in your lines stylesheet: ("0x12" is a Garmin routable and needs to be defined transparent in your typfile; 1A can be defined whatever, in my case I have it as black dots) code:highway=virtual [0x12 road_class=1 road_speed=1 resoluti... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-13 00:18:13 UTC | Stereo | That's definitely tagging for the renderer, and therefore not allowed :)https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer | |
| 4 | 2017-12-13 20:00:24 UTC | wilda69 | I suppose the virtual OSM tag is to compensate for those that sadly use polygons to plot lines ;) I am still horrified at the way Place Guillaume II and Place d'Armes have been tagged, causing steps to lead to nowhere and having a circular track you can't get to.I would say a problem of a l... | |
| 54539940 by gcaspar | 1 | 2017-12-11 14:24:07 UTC | Stereo | Wolls du den arret rout bréck wirklech aus all dene Buslinne läschen? |
| 2 | 2017-12-11 14:42:16 UTC | Stereo | Ass gefléckt! | |
| 54525539 by s-tikhomirov | 1 | 2017-12-11 02:40:19 UTC | Stereo | Hello! Yes, these are in Sanem. The border is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93580760Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 54456780 by X6996 | 1 | 2017-12-08 13:18:32 UTC | tux67 | Hallo X6996,willkommen bei OSM. Mit dem Ansatz jedes Gehege mit leisure=park zu versehen haben Deine Edits genau das Muster von Leuten, die versuchen, Pokémons anzulocken. Das ist bei uns unerwünscht. Bitte trage nur Dinge ein, die der Realität entsprechen!Ohne änderung... |
| 2 | 2017-12-08 16:03:50 UTC | X6996 | HalloDas ist ja mal eine nette Unterstellung. Ich habe die Anderung mit lokalem Wissen und reinen Gewissen durchgeführt. Falls sie nicht Perfekt war, ok mein Fehler aber dafür muss man nicht gleich angegiftet werden man würde die Karte für Pokemonogo verändern. Der Spi... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-08 16:39:01 UTC | tux67 | Danke für das Feedback. Leider ist die "Unterstellung" häufiger Realität als man wünschen würde und falls die o.g. Wortwahl zu drastisch sein sollte, entschuldige ich mich dafür. Wir sind für jede gute Erweiterung der Karte dankbar.Ich habe einen lokal... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-08 17:24:28 UTC | Stereo | Moien Laurent, a Wëlkomm och op OSM!Bei deinen Edits sieht alles gut aus, und es scheint alles der Realität zu entsprechen. Nur den Bachlauf hattest du als Fluss (waterway=river) getaggt; ich habe es jetzt als Entwässerungsgraben (waterway=ditch) umgetaggt. Bei der Breite muss man... | |
| 54400751 by jennilu | 1 | 2017-12-06 19:09:07 UTC | Stereo | Hi Jennilu, welcome to OpenStreetmap!You've actually removed correct information from those nodes, which isn't a good thing. OpenStreetMap is a common shared database, and shouldn't be damaged to fit a routing algorithm - instead, the routing algorithm should be fixed.Are you working with th... |
| 53437155 by doktorpixel14 | 1 | 2017-12-06 02:45:23 UTC | Stereo | Hallo doktorpixel14! Darf ich fragen, was deine Quelle für das CEPS ist? Viele Grüße und frohes mappen. |
| 2 | 2017-12-06 12:53:17 UTC | doktorpixel14 | In diesem Changeset hab ich eigentlich nur die Nummern der Stationen vom Luftbild abgelesen. Ansonsten hab ich die Abschnitte über die Pfosten an der Oberfläche vor Ort erfasst. | |
| 54159486 by gcaspar | 1 | 2017-11-28 21:24:18 UTC | Stereo | Huet de rescht gestëmmt? :)Se si nach net an iD, mais d'Loftbiller vun 2017 sin disponibel: https://{switch:wmts3,wmts4}.geoportail.lu/opendata/wmts/ortho_latest/GLOBAL_WEBMERCATOR_4_V3/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.jpeg als Couche bäisetzen. |
| 2 | 2017-12-01 07:26:25 UTC | gcaspar | hunn nach net alles gekuckt. kennen och net den läschten Stand. Vill Saachen muss een nom 10/12 op d'Plaz kucke goe.dat hei wier nemmen een routing Fehler ginn. Merci vir den Tipp mat den Loftbiller | |
| 53802640 by SHARCRASH | 1 | 2017-11-27 19:50:51 UTC | Stereo | Je ne comprends pas "leave this node disconnected, the unstraightened area routing may mislead people", c'est un bug dans les routeurs? |
| 2 | 2017-11-27 20:48:06 UTC | SHARCRASH | Le périmètre des highway areas, parkings par exemple... sontutilisés pour le routing des directions de chemin. Si ces areas là sont collés à des batiments qui ont des formes géométriques complexes, le routing suivra la géométrie c... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-27 20:55:05 UTC | SHARCRASH | Voici ce que ca devrait donner avec un mapping clean (node déconnecté) par rapport au 2e exemple que j'ai donné sur mon comentaire précédent: http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=49.61047%2C6.12977%3B49.61107%2C6.13244#map=18/49... | |
| 4 | 2017-11-27 21:00:31 UTC | SHARCRASH | Un exemple bien pourri: http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=49.75837%2C6.64179%3B49.75851%2C6.63974#map=19/49.75843/6.64076 | |
| 54114695 by marc_gerges | 1 | 2017-11-27 13:24:50 UTC | Stereo | Good riddance! |
| 54028558 by AVL_FLI_KA | 1 | 2017-11-23 16:11:13 UTC | Stereo | Moien! Zimmlech cool mat de Loftbiller vun 2017 ze gesi wéi d'Tramsschinne guer net wäit vun der Realitéit waren :).Et sin e puer Weichen ouni Referenz, hu dir se villäicht? https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/tei |
| 2 | 2017-11-24 06:55:23 UTC | AVL_FLI_KA | Salut,Jo ass mega, hunn schon ongedelleg drop gewart :).Nee leider net, haat just Pläng wou keng Referenzen drop stoungen. | |
| 53217928 by FvGordon | 1 | 2017-10-24 23:07:56 UTC | Stereo | Thanks, I’ve added the correct one! |
| 52971066 by Garmin-User | 1 | 2017-10-16 11:25:21 UTC | Stereo | Diese admin_levels sind aber schon auf der relation. |
| 2 | 2017-10-16 12:01:20 UTC | Garmin-User | Stimmt natürlich. Ich habe admin_level und boundary an Members ergänzt, wo dies "fehlte". Das betraf nur einen kleinen Teil in Bezug zum Rest, der in Ordnung ist. So ist es einheitlich und erleichtert u.U. die Unterscheidung von anderen Objekten bei Edits, wenn Relationen nicht g... | |
| 52860501 by freeclimber | 1 | 2017-10-12 15:41:36 UTC | Stereo | Hello! Kenns du schon http://regio-osm.de/hausnummerauswertung/auswertung_anzeigen?job_ids=24607&land=Luxembourg&stadt=Differdange ? |
| 2 | 2017-10-13 21:05:37 UTC | freeclimber | Salut, nee kennen ech nach net. Merci fir de Link. | |
| 52628240 by Pmz | 1 | 2017-10-04 16:06:53 UTC | Stereo | Déjà! Merci! |
| 2 | 2017-10-04 16:07:47 UTC | Stereo | T’es certain du highway=primary et pas secondary par contre? | |
| 52266859 by marc_gerges | 1 | 2017-09-22 10:32:25 UTC | Stereo | Looks perfect :) |
| 52236881 by marc_gerges | 1 | 2017-09-21 09:34:06 UTC | Stereo | Is it one-way for bicycles too? |
| 2 | 2017-09-21 10:13:15 UTC | marc_gerges | I am not sure, will check this tomorrow when passing there | |
| 52002656 by henkuit54 | 1 | 2017-09-13 11:25:51 UTC | Stereo | I’m not sure that’s really in Nepal :) |
| 2 | 2017-09-13 19:02:39 UTC | henkuit54 | I'm sure this really is not Nepal! I'm new to editing OSM, so I didn't notice I was still in the changeset I was working on in Nepal. I did stop that, but ... | |
| 51729358 by helicoducair | 1 | 2017-09-04 20:01:11 UTC | Stereo | Schade, dass aeroway=parking_position nicht gerendert wird... https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1610 |
| 51662407 by SHARCRASH | 1 | 2017-09-03 08:17:45 UTC | GerdP | Hi!Please review highway=crossing + footway=crossing on some ways. The correct tagging is highway=footway + footway=crossingSee http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 14:47:33 UTC | SHARCRASH | Hello! This is quite misleading! The page you shared is the one i had seen recently and what i have done actually for this changeset. I had already used the combination highway=footway + footway=crossing though but i don't use very often urban elements, so i had to check again, was confused and I th... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-04 17:59:43 UTC | Stereo | The crossing=zebra tag is, unfortunately, incorrect. I try to replace it with crossing=uncontrolled/traffic_signals/unmarked when I come across it. Apparently there's more than 1000 in Luxembourg :-/. | |
| 4 | 2017-09-04 22:54:00 UTC | SHARCRASH | Yeah people tend to imitate what they see often, even unknowingly errors assuming it is correct. I've changed the tags i had edited in this area with crossing=traffic_signals or uncontrolledcrossing_ref=zebrafootway=crossinghighway=footway | |
| 51694149 by Maarten Deen | 1 | 2017-09-03 14:34:23 UTC | Stereo | I'm just so happy you're doing all this good work with the RGTR lines. |
| 51118047 by wilda69 | 1 | 2017-08-14 20:45:20 UTC | Stereo | That must have been a pleasant survey :). |
| 51039728 by Loll78 | 1 | 2017-08-11 22:44:05 UTC | Stereo | Pass op, du hues do d’Buslinne futti gemach! |
| 50880733 by Maarten Deen | 1 | 2017-08-06 12:14:23 UTC | Stereo | This is great, thank you! |
| 2 | 2017-08-06 20:12:20 UTC | Maarten Deen | Thanks! | |
| 50676209 by s-tikhomirov | 1 | 2017-07-30 11:28:02 UTC | Stereo | Hi! The version of JOSM that’s bundled with Debian is quite old. Using a more recent version will let you for example apply layer filters, which is really useful to make the 2016 and 2013 imagery easier to distinguish. Happy mapping! |
| 50666823 by wilda69 | 1 | 2017-07-29 16:39:01 UTC | Stereo | Oh, that’s very useful to know! Thanks! |
| 2 | 2017-07-30 07:40:34 UTC | wilda69 | Ive plotted it how it is now, and suspect wef September the NE corner will all be construction | |
| 3 | 2017-07-30 07:41:03 UTC | wilda69 | Ofcourse ment NW corner ;) | |
| 50459580 by pdsp2808 | 1 | 2017-07-26 06:37:04 UTC | nammala | Hi,Noticed that you have been random tags to buildings. Could you please confirm the edits.regards,nammala |
| 2 | 2017-07-26 18:49:15 UTC | Stereo | Hi Nammala! What random tags, addr:street=maison? It’s unfortunately still common in small Luxembourgish villages to have no street names, so people just live in house 10, etc. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-27 04:07:14 UTC | nammala | Hi Stereo,This one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352154840/history#map=19/49.88374/6.25656 | |
| 50525908 by Correcaminos604 | 1 | 2017-07-24 13:23:07 UTC | Stereo | Bonjour,Qui sont les éditeurs de cartes reconnus? Nous n’avons pas le droit de copier d’autres cartes. |
| 2 | 2017-07-24 15:11:53 UTC | Correcaminos604 | Comment dois-je répondre à cela??Le classement des routes et rues sur Arlon était assez aléatoire et j'ai donc cherché à requalifier les routes principales de façon cohérente à partir de ma connaissance des lieux tout en objectivant mo... | |
| 50268387 by ridixcr | 1 | 2017-07-13 22:03:47 UTC | Stereo | Cheers :)I see you’re editing for the mapbox global team, did you see we also have more recent, better imagery from 2016?(Would you know if we could get it integrated into mapbox satellite? It’s licensed under CC-0.) |
| 50242501 by ridixcr | 1 | 2017-07-12 23:49:40 UTC | Stereo | Dude. It said "New outdoor fitness (athletics, bars) near completion.” in the changeset comment. Of course there’s no visible geometry, and now our newbie is potentially confused. |
| 2 | 2017-07-13 06:36:57 UTC | ridixcr | Hi! 👋Thanks for the clarification 💡I proceeded to reverse my changesetshave nice day 🙇 | |
| 3 | 2017-07-13 14:06:47 UTC | Stereo | Cheers! You too! | |
| 49403670 by scleija | 1 | 2017-06-09 17:43:13 UTC | Stereo | You can actually add the ortho 2016 pictures in Go Map. PM me if you’re interested. Happy mapping! |
| 49252828 by peter_osm | 1 | 2017-06-05 08:56:50 UTC | Stereo | Hello! Be careful, you’ve now got contradicting tags on, for example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118876578 - maxspeed and maxspeed:backwards are different. Happy mapping! |
| 2 | 2017-06-05 19:43:40 UTC | peter_osm | Hi StereoI thought I got all the tags, but one fell through the cracks. Thanks for your hint, I corrected it already. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-07 10:06:54 UTC | Stereo | Cool! Thanks! | |
| 49239163 by ikew | 1 | 2017-06-04 11:13:32 UTC | Stereo | Hallo, wilkommen auf OpenStreetMap! Da es den Weg immerin gibt, habe ich es als privat bezeichnet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49239770 |
| 49200035 by Spicy_lazy_kat | 1 | 2017-06-02 16:32:23 UTC | Stereo | Hello! Monterey is actually access=destination, that’s what the white circle with a red border means in Luxembourg. That way, someone making a delivery to the Singer shop or driving to one of the underground parkings can still use the road.Would you like me to correct the map there? |
| 2 | 2017-06-02 19:47:34 UTC | Spicy_lazy_kat | Hi,Yes please change this, I didn't check the sign. | |
| 49077610 by xXMapperXx | 1 | 2017-05-29 17:14:44 UTC | Stereo | Those look correct! |
| 2 | 2017-06-03 05:20:54 UTC | xXMapperXx | Well, they shared lines, which I was told was depreciated | |
| 48963415 by xXMapperXx | 1 | 2017-05-26 11:45:01 UTC | SHARCRASH | Please, do not make cliffs a closed round way, or they won't render in Mapnik and other maps. I think this is the case also with other elements. That's why i created all those rocky cliffs with 2 seperate lines. |
| 2 | 2017-05-28 09:32:23 UTC | Stereo | https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/268 says circular cliffs should work as soon as the next version of carto makes it to production. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-29 09:47:50 UTC | SHARCRASH | Yeah but for now it doesn't, so in my opinion this little hack does the job without compromising the future fix. | |
| 48739529 by Paddy1984 | 1 | 2017-05-27 07:58:14 UTC | Stereo | Super! Und du hast es bis zu http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nammala/diary/41413 gepackt :) |
| 2 | 2017-05-29 22:59:21 UTC | Verdy_p | see also the details in:- Parc du Thabor, Rennes, France (http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/48.11397/-1.66902), or- Jardins du Palais de Versailles, France(http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/48.80568/2.11634)- Villa Borghese, Roma, Italia (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48739529... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-29 23:02:58 UTC | Verdy_p | The two previous examples in France are even more precise (geometrically, with 10cm precision and precise alignment) | |
| 4 | 2017-05-30 12:41:28 UTC | Nakaner | In meinen Augen ist das Schloss ein Gebäude und daher habe ich building=yes wieder ergänzt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49102958 | |
| 48979398 by bferreira | 1 | 2017-05-26 10:00:28 UTC | Stereo | Hi! I saw your changes and notes. On one hand, yes, they’re no longer communes. On the other, the lines are still the limits between the localities, so they should be adapted to reflect that. |
| 48572531 by helicoducair | 1 | 2017-05-10 20:43:07 UTC | Stereo | Cool for openrailwaymap.org :) |
| 48161381 by scleija | 1 | 2017-04-26 12:24:13 UTC | Stereo | Hello! What would you think of tagging the forests with both name=<Luxembourgish name> and name:de=<German name> and/or name:fr=<French name>?Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 48003882 by sma352 | 1 | 2017-04-21 15:30:58 UTC | Stereo | Hello! The Cafetin was already mapped on the building :) |
| 47252463 by 0belix999 | 1 | 2017-03-29 10:09:05 UTC | Stereo | Thanks for checking this :) |
| 47173631 by Steven Ferreira | 1 | 2017-03-27 00:14:34 UTC | Stereo | Hello! I think that you made an honest mistake here: the Kockelscheuer forest isn’t a park, the outline of it isn’t a footway, and the water bodies inside of it isn’t a reservoir. I see that another user has already undone most of your changes.Please don’t let this discou... |
| 47149199 by Loll78 | 1 | 2017-03-25 18:04:12 UTC | Stereo | Ah, du wars méi séier wi ech :). Wars du och scho sur place? |
| 47095257 by Der Harry | 1 | 2017-03-23 14:57:21 UTC | Stereo | Danke! |
| 47026885 by Polyglot | 1 | 2017-03-21 11:09:53 UTC | Stereo | Great to see you’re active in our area again :) |
| 2 | 2017-03-21 21:43:35 UTC | Polyglot | Yes, little by little. In fact I'm preparing a new GSoC project: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/2017/JOSM_Plugins Trying to find issues with the PT_Assistant plugin | |
| 3 | 2017-03-22 14:46:25 UTC | Stereo | Awesome! The 2016 vintage has been so useful, it's great that you're going for it again. There has been no interest in my GSoC proposal so far – any takers for yours?I'm seeing duplicate ways being introduced, and I'm not sure whether it's the plugin:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/2... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-22 14:47:54 UTC | Stereo | Two more:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481437499https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56092848 | |
| 5 | 2017-03-22 15:44:35 UTC | Polyglot | I'm afraid it's probably me | |
| 46912817 by kewl | 1 | 2017-03-17 10:45:38 UTC | Stereo | Exciting! Steep? |
| 2 | 2017-03-17 12:04:05 UTC | kewl | A little bit, but it goes to the stargazing point I mentioned last weekend, so it's worth the effort ;-) | |
| 46694504 by ericdsob | 1 | 2017-03-08 23:16:08 UTC | Stereo | Oui, c’est parfait comme ça. Il faut en effet l’adresse complète pour pouvoir planifier l’itinéraire. |
| 46637945 by Dagou | 1 | 2017-03-07 12:28:13 UTC | Stereo | Je ne savais pas que les couches du cadastre marchaient aussi avec Vespucci! Ça fonctionne bien? |
| 2 | 2017-03-12 18:01:26 UTC | Dagou | Oui, en fait c'est par l'intermédiaire de geoportail apparemment. | |
| 46493949 by scleija | 1 | 2017-03-01 13:32:59 UTC | Stereo | Hi scleija! You’re right, it’s not a hamlet. Since there still *is* such a place, I’ve re-tagged it as ‘place=isolated_dwelling’. Please, once again, be careful about deleting objects that might be useful to others.Guillaume |
| 46485448 by Rickychiang0330 | 1 | 2017-03-01 09:50:46 UTC | Stereo | Hello, the Bock (貝克) is actually on the other side! |
| 46393195 by scleija | 1 | 2017-02-25 18:19:30 UTC | Stereo | Hi, and welcome to OSM!We have a low-traffic Luxembourg mailing list at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-luand a slow wiki at wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/LuxembourgWhy were these trees superfluous? If someone’s taken the time to map trees, they must have been important t... |
| 2 | 2017-02-26 01:36:08 UTC | Verdy_p | I agree, notably for this place where it is a public parc with significant public investments by the municipality: this is a place to visit and take leasure time.The only reason why one would remove them would be to add more precise data with species, tree sizes... This is not just a large area of... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-27 12:40:23 UTC | Stereo | Hi! I've re-planted the trees at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46441452 | |
| 4 | 2017-02-28 07:22:44 UTC | scleija | If there were only one tree in the entire park, it would make sense to add a tree, as a landmark, that would actually help the map reader. There are many trees in the park, like in a forest. The use of the area tool is sufficient. The addition of random trees does not make the map better, it just ma... | |
| 5 | 2017-02-28 16:40:42 UTC | Stereo | Are you maybe coming from Wikipedia, which has notability criteria? OpenStreetMap has no such thing (although in practical terms, people don't usually map things that are smaller than 30 cm).The welcome guide for Wikipedians ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Wikipedia_users#We_d... | |
| 6 | 2017-02-28 17:14:55 UTC | Verdy_p | I'm not a newbie on OSM. An no, I'm not concerned about Wikipedia notability rules which are independant. In fact wood areas make sense (instead of indivual trees) when the trees are packed together (with touching/mixing branches and leaves) and the area includes trees with very variable sizes and o... | |
| 7 | 2017-02-28 17:21:36 UTC | Verdy_p | Those that don't like indivusal trees would prefer mapping areas for adding things such as species (but in fact this is wrong in many cases as wooded areas and forest have many species and trees are not the only elements), or want to map owned parcels of land. Take this map example, there's a correc... | |
| 46441866 by scleija | 1 | 2017-02-27 13:06:08 UTC | Stereo | Hi! I don’t know if you’re seeing my messages, can you please comment?If you look at the rest of the country, you’ll see that we usually tag the church names after the saints - "Église Saint-Joseph” would be correct here. That this is the Alzénger Kierc... |
| 2 | 2017-02-28 07:10:47 UTC | scleija | 1) Who is we?2) Why French? We are in Luxembourg. I suggest "Saint-Joseph Kierch". | |
| 3 | 2017-02-28 16:13:36 UTC | Stereo | Hey, thanks for replying. 'We' is just how I see the community consensus in Luxembourg. It is a bit of a special case in the OSM community, since we're such a mix of languages, and the 'on the ground' rule that's so helpful elsewhere is harder to apply. Indeed, you do find stuff with name tags in Fr... | |
| 46441314 by Steven Ferreira | 1 | 2017-02-27 13:08:48 UTC | Stereo | Hi! (Moien? Bonjour? Hallo?)Since the paths in the park are officially open to bicycles, I’d tagged those as highway=path. A highway=footway that’s bicycle=designated seems contradictory.What do you think?Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 2 | 2017-02-27 17:39:24 UTC | Steven Ferreira | Hi!Well to be honest i think it's still better footway because in any park you can use your bicycle.Also to keep consistency with the other parks, a footway would be more appropriate.Happy mapping too:),Steven | |
| 46406418 by Verdy_p | 1 | 2017-02-26 18:14:28 UTC | Stereo | T’as remis les arbres que scleija avait effacés?Les photos sont d’août dernier, ça va hein ;-p |
| 2 | 2017-02-26 20:11:17 UTC | Verdy_p | Non pas du tout. Mais les photos aériennes de Bing semblent anciennes et montrent la zone de travaux alors que les photos de terrain montrent la mairie construite. Le parc est peut-être réaménagé...Je ne me firais donc pas à l'imagerie Bing , je n'ai restau... | |
| 46379653 by Prince Kassad | 1 | 2017-02-25 12:22:28 UTC | Stereo | Hi! The version of JOSM you’re using, 6388, is from November 2013. There have been many improvements and fixes since. Is there a bug that’s stopping you from upgrading?Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 2 | 2017-02-25 17:33:35 UTC | Prince Kassad | Hi, the reason for this is actually that JOSM after 6388 forces you to enter a source and refuses upload if you don't enter one. But most of my changes are mere fixes to existing OSM data (like this one - "Wochenendhausgebiet" is not the name of a village, but a description of the resident... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-25 18:09:08 UTC | Stereo | Oh, that's solvable: source=local knowledge, or common knowledge, or extrapolation are the ones I use. I think that recent versions actually let you leave that field blank - but other mappers appreciate good changeset data :) | |
| 46306766 by xXMapperXx | 1 | 2017-02-22 15:59:47 UTC | Stereo | It is the correct tagging :) |
| 45944075 by Vietwoojagig | 1 | 2017-02-09 12:47:47 UTC | Stereo | Hi! Are you sure? The paint on the asphalt says “BUS” in the august 2016 pictures, which is why I tagged them as bus lanes, but then I wasn’t there.way 303435609 might need to be retagged too.Happy mapping! |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 19:18:57 UTC | Vietwoojagig | I was driving that street today.The BUS painting has been removed and the street is open to everyone | |
| 45893320 by Stereo_repair | 1 | 2017-02-08 06:08:07 UTC | Stereo | The changeset comment should read:Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 |
| 45857311 by gcaspar | 1 | 2017-02-06 16:11:54 UTC | Stereo | Yay! |
| 45725004 by Dagou | 1 | 2017-02-02 11:22:50 UTC | Stereo | Super, j’ai commencé à mettre à jour avec les photos de 2016, mais ça avance vite! Tu les as dans Vespucci aussi? |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 23:22:11 UTC | Dagou | Salut, pas vraiment : elles sont apparue dans la liste, mais elles n'apparaissaient pas quand je les sélectionnais. Depuis elles ont disparue de la liste. 2013 est le max. Du coup je complète avec des traces GPS. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-04 10:02:38 UTC | Stereo | Ah, dommage! D’après https://github.com/MarcusWolschon/osmeditor4android/issues/250 tu peux les rajouter dans ton imagery.json. L’url à rajouter pour les Ortho 2016 serait https://{switch:wmts3,wmts4}.geoportail.lu/opendata/wmts/ortho_2016/GLOBAL_WEBMERCATOR_4_V3/{zoom}/{x}... | |
| 45717513 by FrViPofm | 1 | 2017-02-01 15:34:06 UTC | streckenkundler | Why do you record not your changes to the Forum or the mailing list? I miss a list of proposed changes since changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44987328All massive changes on trees are not discussed!!! |
| 2 | 2017-02-01 17:20:29 UTC | FrViPofm | Hi,I've been very active in the past on mailing lists, mainly in French, but also in English, a pity, never in German.But I'm a little tired of talking today : what can I do with that : https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958It seemed to me obvious that normalizing the names... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-01 21:03:31 UTC | streckenkundler | Good evening...Ok, the child fell into the well... (german proverb).Also I have great interest, that the plants name are correct. Your idea was very good.Let us sort it. First of all: please write the changes that you've written here, also o a new site in a table at the OSM-WIKI with cor... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-01 21:33:33 UTC | FrViPofm | My mistake may come from :species:it =Platano comuneand https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platane_commun that say : Platanus ×hispanicaBut also https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platanus gives : Platanus acerifolia (Aiton) Willd. - platano comune | |
| 5 | 2017-02-01 21:38:03 UTC | FrViPofm | And more : in the Bologna import, the (usualy) 3 letters value of species tag is an abbreviation of the binomial name. So Pla = *Pl*atanus *a*cerifolia = Platanus × hispanica | |
| 6 | 2017-02-02 17:35:48 UTC | Stereo | Bonjour FrViPofm,Si tu veux, on peut parler en Français et/ou en privé.I'm delighted to see that a conversation has begun. Your massive edits aren't a bad idea, and I hope that you won't let the DWG's block discourage you.You *must absolutely* discuss these massive edits fi... | |
| 7 | 2017-02-02 20:39:19 UTC | streckenkundler | Good evening FrViPofm.I think it is quite important that you write the documentation. That brings peace and others know what you've done. Is it not more.The genus Platanus....I think the genus Platanus seems to be a very specific genus with various errors in the names of plants. The... | |
| 8 | 2017-02-04 09:53:22 UTC | Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45798879 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 9 | 2017-02-04 10:08:16 UTC | Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45800694 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 10 | 2017-02-06 04:30:11 UTC | Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45838308 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 11 | 2017-02-06 11:04:39 UTC | Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45852519 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 12 | 2017-02-06 12:08:29 UTC | Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45853882 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 13 | 2017-02-07 02:16:29 UTC | Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45854666 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 14 | 2017-02-07 03:18:10 UTC | Stereo_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45872554 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 45214763 by Stereo | 1 | 2017-01-17 11:48:12 UTC | mueschel | Could you please stop adding your personal fantasy about tagging again and again and stop vandalizing OSM data? |
| 2 | 2017-01-17 21:43:55 UTC | trial | +1, please at least describe what you want to do. Except BS I mean. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-02 16:59:13 UTC | Stereo | Of course it's partly meant as a joke. At the SotM EU, we came across this strange box, and decided to dedicate it as a monument to RichardF. The RichardF box does exist, and the physical properties are all correct. Someone even slapped a "Surveyed by OSM" sticker on it.It is an exampl... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-02 18:12:20 UTC | mueschel | And this "joke" now renders on every map as a huge pile of Unicode garbage, gives errors because of incorrect units in the height tag and service_times that don't follow the documented tagging rules. | |
| 5 | 2017-02-02 19:38:24 UTC | trial | Not on every map, http://b.tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=20&lat=49.0107&lon=8.38717&layers=B0000000FFFFFF renders it properly. Both renderers are based on the same stack.But please move your tests to http://www.opengeofiction.net/#map=5/51.500/-0.100 and add the link or the Wiki so that ... | |
| 6 | 2017-02-02 19:50:58 UTC | mueschel | The name:fr tag, which is rendered by openstreetmap.fr doesn't contain the Unicode stuff. The default osm.org map shows the Unicode properly, too. But tag is just a collection of Unicode weirdness without any meaning. | |
| 7 | 2017-02-02 20:03:12 UTC | trial | Right. Time to cleanup! | |
| 45476109 by Frédéric Gutkin | 1 | 2017-01-25 13:52:07 UTC | Stereo | Mea culpa. Merci! |
| 2 | 2017-01-25 22:37:48 UTC | Frédéric Gutkin | Pas de problème, Guillaume !Dieu sait si les multipolygones m'ont parfois aussi joué des tours.Cordialement,Frédéric | |
| 44042511 by Ali_Alg | 1 | 2017-01-09 19:54:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Your changeset comment says that you used Google as a source in this changeset. We are not allowed to copy from Google (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to not do this again. We (OpenStreetMap's Dat... |
| 2 | 2017-01-09 19:55:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | مرحبا،يقول changeset تعليقك الذي استخدمته جوجل كمصدر في هذا changeset. نحن لا يسمح لنا لنسخ من جوجل (انظر https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F لمزيد من التفاصي... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-09 19:56:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Bonjour,Votre commentaire sur le jeu de modifications indique que vous avez utilisé Google comme source dans ce jeu de modifications. Nous ne sommes pas autorisés à copier de Google (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_fro... | |
| 4 | 2017-01-20 10:34:53 UTC | Ali_Alg | Source utilisé est image free de Google et parcours sur terrain | |
| 5 | 2017-01-21 14:57:12 UTC | Stereo | Bonjour,Les images de Google ne sont malheureusement pas 'free' - elles sont gratuites, mais pas libres. Merci de ne plus les utiliser. | |
| 6 | 2017-01-22 00:30:38 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45360825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google tracing usage | |
| 45301790 by glglgl | 1 | 2017-01-19 17:59:44 UTC | Stereo | Dafür ist im “Relation Toolbox” Plugin die Funktion “Rebuild polygon” super. |
| 45253555 by Laurent75 | 1 | 2017-01-18 14:00:34 UTC | Stereo | Salut! Hues du gesin, dat mer elo och Biller vun 2016 vum geoportal hun? |
| 45249716 by Klumbumbus | 1 | 2017-01-17 18:58:36 UTC | Stereo | Yay, new imagery :) |
| 2 | 2017-01-17 19:19:59 UTC | Klumbumbus | :D | |
| 3 | 2017-01-17 19:22:41 UTC | Klumbumbus | Lucky people in Luxembourg :) In most parts of Germany bing from 2012 is the only available source :( | |
| 45218975 by jln35 | 1 | 2017-01-17 18:13:42 UTC | Stereo | Hi! I usually set the villa name inside the addr:housename, as suggested by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr . What do you think? |
| 2 | 2017-01-18 10:28:07 UTC | jln35 | Oui, c'est une bonne idée : je n'avais pas remarqué cette clé ! Pensez-vous qu'il faudrait que je revienne sur tous les noms que j'aidonnés avec la clé "name" de "building" ? J'en ai mis des quantités surVillefranche... et je n... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-21 18:20:58 UTC | trial | Comme il vous écrit en anglais et que vous répondez en français, je continue la discussion. Effectivement ce sont plutôt des housemummer, de même pour building=residential, je pense que pour une villa c'est plutôt building=house.Grosso modo je dirais villa/c... | |
| 4 | 2017-01-27 09:25:25 UTC | jln35 | Le nom correct est celui inscrit par Stereo. J'ai supprimé mon ajout erroné après avoir été sur place.Le problème concret vient de l'interface de l'éditeur ID qui ne place pas la clé "housename" dans les champs d'adresse : on ne l... | |
| 45246265 by Frédéric Gutkin | 1 | 2017-01-17 18:11:11 UTC | Stereo | Hello,Have you seen that the 2016 imagery is now available under 'geoportail.lu' in the Imagery menu?Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 2 | 2017-01-17 22:04:51 UTC | Frédéric Gutkin | Hello Guillaume,Thank you very much for your advice.From now on, I will use this layer for mapping...Best regards,Frédéric | |
| 45216357 by juminet | 1 | 2017-01-16 16:00:43 UTC | Stereo | Ok, je vois que c'est pas tombé en marche pour l'autre inner. J'ai ouvert un bug: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2550 |
| 2 | 2017-01-16 16:01:06 UTC | Stereo | Oops, sorry, in English. I see that it hasn't fixed the issue for the other inner forest, and have opened a bug. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-17 09:47:30 UTC | juminet | Bonjour, Meanwhile, I changed a forest polygon into a MP and made some holes corresponding to 2 ponds & 1 meadow (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6887348) and the rendering is OK. Strange that this bug only occurs when the 2 polygons should be rendered equally (as there is no different... | |
| 45012487 by alexwolf23 | 1 | 2017-01-11 15:20:54 UTC | Stereo | Und, geht es? :)Objekte, die nur `name=*` haben, werden normalerweise nicht gezeigt. Verschiedene QS-Tools zeigen das auch als Fehler an. Du müsstest z.B. `amenity=shop` und `shop=squirrel` hinzufügen. |
| 2 | 2017-01-11 20:48:20 UTC | alexwolf23 | ja klappt :) | |
| 44811173 by lf6648 | 1 | 2016-12-31 17:41:39 UTC | Stereo | Hi! Is there somewhere I can read about this import? |
| 31568572 by TestsGalore | 1 | 2016-12-30 09:01:02 UTC | Stereo | What's your source for the jellyfish? I couldn't see the evil on Bing. |
| 44514796 by Pmz | 1 | 2016-12-29 10:55:43 UTC | Stereo | Ah t'as été le plus rapide, merci :D |
| 44692454 by Stereo | 1 | 2016-12-28 12:31:10 UTC | Erdrandbewohner | Rolltreppe Tiefgarage? Nein, das ist ein ganz normales Treppenhaus, welches die Tiefgarage mit der Platzoberfläche verbindet. Ich benenne es mal um. :) |
| 2 | 2016-12-28 22:02:46 UTC | Stereo | Aha, danke dir! | |
| 44310917 by Emilio Gomez | 1 | 2016-12-13 20:49:44 UTC | Stereo | Hi! Did you mean to delete all these ways, or was it an accident? |
| 2 | 2016-12-13 21:11:26 UTC | Emilio Gomez | Hi Stereo. I am redraw precisely the land uses of that area. The eliminated geometries (a great relation) were part of the importation of Corine, whose quality leaves much to be desired. After trying to improve the accuracy I came to the conclusion that it is easier to erase it and start from scratc... | |
| 3 | 2016-12-13 21:13:38 UTC | Stereo | You're fast to reply! :)Yeah, Corine is the same everywhere. Are you just drawing from the PNOA images? I see you've tagged one forest as eucalyptus, how can I tell if I want to map too? | |
| 4 | 2016-12-13 21:26:23 UTC | Emilio Gomez | I live near this area and here, in Cantabria, almost all forest plantations are made of eucalyptus globulus. When you've been looking at eucalyptus and more eucalyptus trees for a long time, you recognize them right away. I use PNOA and Bing indistinctly because sometimes plantations have been cut b... | |
| 44301666 by Stéphane Gleizes | 1 | 2016-12-10 12:03:25 UTC | Stereo | Hi neighbour! Welcome to OSM, have fun mapping! Have you seen that there’s more than one background imagery layer you can trace from? |
| 44208870 by Stereo | 1 | 2016-12-09 21:20:39 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found the keys ref:FLIK and ref:flik - can you just use one spelling? Btw, did you check that this source is licensed in a way compatible to OSM?Jan |
| 2 | 2016-12-10 02:43:24 UTC | Stereo | Hi Jan,Yes, the data is CC-0, https://data.public.lu/en/datasets/referentiel-des-parcelles-agricoles-flik/You’re right that it’s not good to mix the case; I’ll correct the lowercase to FLIK. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-10 03:07:50 UTC | Stereo | Done, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44295866Thank you for making me aware of this! | |
| 44279247 by cricri9be | 1 | 2016-12-10 00:40:33 UTC | Stereo | Hello! Les clôtures que tu as effacées existent en vrai; je les ai remises. C'est quoi le problème que tu rencontres avec xplane? On peut peut-être demander à Austin de corriger ça au niveau de xplane, ou trouver une autre façon de tagger ça. |
| 44257242 by Damien103 | 1 | 2016-12-08 14:52:34 UTC | Stereo | Bonjour, bienvenue! Attention, les modifications faites sont directement reprises sur la carte. J’ai annulé ces changements. |
| 43741663 by LogicalViolinist | 1 | 2016-11-18 14:31:36 UTC | Stereo | Awesome! Thanks!! |
| 2 | 2016-11-18 16:10:20 UTC | DenisCarriere | Woot! 🚀🚀 | |
| 3 | 2016-11-19 06:32:52 UTC | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618 | |
| 43747057 by Stereo | 1 | 2016-11-17 23:29:35 UTC | Stereo | Source = very_local_knowledge |
| 43726311 by Degerlocher | 1 | 2016-11-17 16:20:17 UTC | Stereo | Oh I was totally off track then. Thanks! :) |
| 43727187 by phil-x | 1 | 2016-11-17 16:19:17 UTC | Stereo | Hi again! If you tag the building itself as building=ruins, it will render on the map.I’d tag it as building=ruins ruins=chapel and leave out the name tag because that isn’t really the name.Happy mapping! |
| 2 | 2016-11-17 19:07:13 UTC | phil-x | i tagged it as historicals site and named it "ruins of a chapel" | |
| 3 | 2016-11-17 19:09:15 UTC | phil-x | oh i think i got it i changed some things! | |
| 42816867 by phil-x | 1 | 2016-11-15 03:46:15 UTC | Stereo | Is it really the place to be? :) |
| 2 | 2016-11-15 10:50:25 UTC | phil-x | Hello Stereo, finally someone found it, did you change it? Just wanted to see how long it takes for people to see that. :P | |
| 3 | 2016-11-16 16:50:23 UTC | Stereo | Hah, now that's evil! Did you leave any others? | |
| 4 | 2016-11-16 23:38:09 UTC | phil-x | well maybe you find something else haha, ye only 2-3 but i edited already like 100 things correctly so it's just to see what happens. 1 tip 2 things are from Game of Thrones. | |
| 5 | 2016-11-17 00:04:43 UTC | Stereo | Hmm, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4449776840 maybe?What's the third one? :) | |
| 6 | 2016-11-17 00:08:14 UTC | Stereo | Found it,way 447921578node 4449776454You actually don't need to tag stuff as both a node and a way since there's only one object - tagging just the way as Deepwood Motte would have been enough.I've deleted both. Happy mapping :) | |
| 7 | 2016-11-17 11:55:07 UTC | phil-x | Great man gj! I see you have already 3200 things changed are you a member of openstreetmap's team? The last one is not worth it, it might even be correct. Greetings! | |
| 8 | 2016-11-17 13:07:19 UTC | Stereo | "might even be correct", hah. Really? Okay, what is it?I'm a regular mapper like you! No official capacity or anything. | |
| 43602176 by wuff57 | 1 | 2016-11-13 11:57:31 UTC | Stereo | Hi! I don’t know if you’ve seen that the upper Chiers is mapped further up, up to its spring at node 2304188384? Should that part be added? I don't know what you’re using these relation for, so I don’t want to break things. |
| 2 | 2016-11-13 21:09:59 UTC | wuff57 | Hi Stereo, thanks for pointing this out. French wikipedia is not specific about the Chiers' spring, so I did not notice the "real" upper section. I have now seen, that there is a bit more in the Luxemburg Wikipedia. I added the section. In general, waterways are tagged as relation of the v... | |
| 43552063 by glglgl | 1 | 2016-11-11 11:25:50 UTC | Stereo | Thanks :) |
| 2 | 2016-11-11 11:31:24 UTC | glglgl | You're welcome.http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43551531 in order to find the other one in a simpler way. | |
| 43359538 by SHARCRASH | 1 | 2016-11-02 18:40:22 UTC | Stereo | Hello! Le tag highway=no est à éviter: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3DnoComme tu joues au golf ;), tu as vu les tags pour mapper les terrains de golf? |
| 2 | 2016-11-02 20:56:39 UTC | SHARCRASH | Oui j'ai vu, mais déprécié n'est pas forcément interdit (highway key can have "user defined" values) et surtout dans ce cas il n'est pas du tout redondant étant donné que je l'ajoute pour éviter que le périmètre de l'area MP ne... | |
| 3 | 2016-11-03 12:43:37 UTC | Stereo | C'est quel logiciel de routage qui fait ça? On dirait un bug!Si c'est utile pour l'édition avec iD, ça serait possible de les virer avant d'uploader? | |
| 4 | 2016-11-03 13:18:09 UTC | SHARCRASH | Guillaume, ce n'est pas un logiciel spécifique mais plusieurs services tiers que ce soit logiciel (Garmin) ou online (Openrouteservice.org ou Graphhoper, OSRM... qui sont d'ailleurs liés à Openstreetmap.org ou Gpsies par exemple). Exemple que j'ai mis en place et qui fonctionne ... | |
| 5 | 2016-11-03 20:18:45 UTC | Stereo | Ah, le problème de la squelettisation topologique, ok. Oui, aucun logiciel de routage ne le fait. Il faudrait un sacré algorithme qui sache connecter chaque adresse sur la place Guillaume II en ville, ou sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/50.06148/19.93774Je pense que plut&o... | |
| 42671939 by Stereo | 1 | 2016-10-08 14:41:46 UTC | mavl | Hello, Stereo. What wrong with way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372411024/history You wrote "Simplified multipolygons." Why? If something is marked as multipolygon, then it's ok. |
| 2 | 2016-10-10 20:13:48 UTC | Stereo | Hello mavl,Thank you very much for your message. It's always interesting to think about mapping practice.Before my edit, there were 28 multipolygon relations, many of them consisting of only outer ways.After turning these into areas, and using big inner islands to contain groups of landu... | |
| 3 | 2016-10-11 17:42:32 UTC | mavl | Thank you so much for your answer. «there were 28 multipolygon relations, many of them consisting of only outer ways» Maybe, the contributor has not finished work yet. I have looked the data in iD and in JOSM. It looks as in other places of a planet (as usually). If we h... | |
| 42689199 by 1r-2m | 1 | 2016-10-07 12:42:21 UTC | Stereo | Hello, je vois que tu es très acti(f|ve) sur le cap. Bienvenue! :)Tu as vu que quand tu dessinais une forme rectangulaire, avec l’éditeur iD, tu pouvais taper S (comme Square) pour rendre tous les angles droits?Bon mapping,Guillaume |
| 42499792 by Dagou | 1 | 2016-09-29 16:43:13 UTC | Stereo | Alors, ça marche? :) |
| 42491284 by glglgl | 1 | 2016-09-29 15:50:46 UTC | Stereo | Hallo,In Luxemburg sind die Grenzsteine oft aber nicht immer ein Teil der Grenze, weil die Steine nicht bewegt werden wenn nachgemessen wird.Viel Spaß beim mappen,Guillaume |
| 42089196 by AtomMapper | 1 | 2016-09-26 11:15:02 UTC | Stereo | Hi AtomMapper,Please follow the import guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines before importing data.The addresses you've mapped are just house numbers, they're not at the position where they are in the source, and you didn't discuss this with the local community... |
| 41926785 by wilda69 | 1 | 2016-09-07 18:17:37 UTC | Stereo | Hi Dan! It looks like this edit broke RGTR line 309. User VoyagesWeber says that they’ll fix it, and update the bypass when it’s opened. Hope you’re good! |
| 2 | 2016-09-07 18:39:23 UTC | wilda69 | Hi Guillaume,Yes I noticed that, and although I am very careful not to upset any existing relations, this one had no option until the "owner" resolves it. I have been conservative in the various map changes here, and over the weeks it will become more clear what can be taken as pass&eac... | |
| 41830427 by SHARCRASH | 1 | 2016-08-31 19:53:27 UTC | Stereo | Tu essaies pas JOSM? :) |
| 2 | 2016-08-31 20:02:01 UTC | SHARCRASH | Je suis passé par là aujourd'hui, j'enregistre mes observations vite fait avant que je n'oublie. :) JOSM je le laisse pour des edits où je pourrai prendre mon temps à chercher les bonnes fonctions, options, listes, etc... pour editer. | |
| 41760808 by shanefrombray | 1 | 2016-08-29 10:40:49 UTC | Stereo | Nice micromapping, thanks! |
| 38823878 by Stereo | 1 | 2016-08-19 08:45:45 UTC | Javier Gutiérrez | Hi Guillaume,in this changeset (4 months ago) you have removed many of the address interpolation I have made at the beginning of the year. Now only the address-from and -to are left (E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/49.58985/6.10251)Just wanted to know if that is the result wan... |
| 2 | 2016-08-19 08:51:55 UTC | Stereo | Hello Javier,Oh no! No, that was not the intended result!However, I do intend to import the open data address points, which will replace these.I'd love to chat about it if you're on whatsapp/google hangouts/iMessage/facebook/twitter - shoot me a message with your contact?Guillaume | |
| 3 | 2016-08-21 17:04:18 UTC | Javier Gutiérrez | Hi Guillaume,Ok I see, the interpolations will be replaced by single address points when importing the open data.As arranged I am not adding any new addresses after our last discussion (just added one or two when updating a construction area).My skype ID is dzien_dobre (I don't use it ve... | |
| 41345619 by Laurent75 | 1 | 2016-08-09 13:42:49 UTC | Stereo | Moien,Ech hun d’Donnéeë vun der Mobilitéitszentral vun data.public.lu convertéiert. Mat JOSM ass dat ganz praktesch:http://stereo.lu/stations.osmHei ass och e gutt Beispill vun enger gut gemappter Bus-Relatioun: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/63039... |
| 41102436 by Denis_Helfer | 1 | 2016-07-29 13:56:08 UTC | Stereo | Bonjour Denis,Tu sembles faire un edit mécanique qui renomme railway=abandoned en railway:abandoned=rail.railway=abandoned est bien plus courant et traité par openrailwaymap, j'avais donc préféré celui-ci. Tu en penses quoi?Ton edit mécanique ne ... |
| 2 | 2016-07-29 16:16:35 UTC | Denis_Helfer | Cela semble plus logique de respecter les recommandations du cycle de vie des objets http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix. Il faut que les rendus suivent et intègre les évolutions intelligentes des attributs. On ne tague pas pour le ... amhaédit mécanique... | |
| 3 | 2016-07-29 16:20:04 UTC | Stereo | Merci pour le lien! La page parle justement de vieux rails, et, dans l'exemple, a à la fois railway=disused et disused:railway=rail. Si ça te va de combiner les deux, ça me va :) | |
| 4 | 2016-07-29 17:20:48 UTC | Denis_Helfer | let's go même si je trouve cela redondant. Il faudrait chasser les disused=yes alors ? | |
| 5 | 2016-07-29 17:23:41 UTC | Stereo | D'après https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:#Updating_older_tagging oui. Mais taginfo trouve 50000 disused=yes, vaste programme! | |
| 40944016 by gcaspar | 1 | 2016-07-22 09:50:30 UTC | Stereo | Schon! :-D |
| 2 | 2016-07-22 09:54:51 UTC | gcaspar | tirlech. war geschter mer dat kuerz ukucken. Verbesserungen sinn natierlech wellkom ;-) | |
| 40400985 by Polyglot | 1 | 2016-06-30 21:42:32 UTC | Stereo | Thanks again :) |
| 40392882 by SHARCRASH | 1 | 2016-06-30 16:04:41 UTC | Stereo | Please don’t delete data because you can’t see an use for it. Others might have an use for it - firefighters for example.In this case, they should have been tagged as service = driveway.Do you know how to undo a changeset? |
| 2 | 2016-06-30 22:43:32 UTC | SHARCRASH | Hi! Well i really don't think that anyone will ever need a map for such tiny driveways, they are barely 20 meters long max according way size/scale, and they are directly accessible from main street or nothing suggests that the entrance from the buildings or private resid.area is somewhat hidden... | |
| 40193180 by Dagou | 1 | 2016-06-22 10:10:38 UTC | Stereo | Hello Dagou, c'est cool que tu débordes de notre côté de la frontière :)Je ne sais pas si tu as vu qu'on a des orthophotos libres disponibles pour le Luxembourg? Elles devraient être dans les arrière-plans Vespucci. |
| 39539391 by 4b696d | 1 | 2016-05-24 18:20:05 UTC | Stereo | Thanks! Would you have any ideas on how to tag the parking positions correctly? |
| 2 | 2016-05-24 18:29:08 UTC | 4b696d | I would tag them as aeroway=parking_position. I can see that you sometimes use aeroway=taxiway at the end of those parking positions. In my opinion those ways are no taxiways as they only point the way from the parking position to the real taxiway. I suppose that there is currently no better method ... | |
| 39371258 by siamak08 | 1 | 2016-05-17 14:02:50 UTC | Stereo | Bonjour! W et E ne veulent pas dire West et East? Est-ce que le bloc du milieu a un nom? |
| 2 | 2016-05-17 14:06:00 UTC | Stereo | D'après http://www.eib.org/attachments/general/livraisons_sur_le_campus_de_la_bei_en.pdf , c'était correct avant. | |
| 3 | 2016-05-17 14:58:32 UTC | siamak08 | Il y a une anomalie sur la carte, lorsqu'on zoom sur le batiment, le WKI devient EKI et EKI devient WKI !Pourriez-vous régler ce problème svp ? Merci. | |
| 4 | 2016-05-17 15:01:18 UTC | Stereo | Ah, je vois, c'est les anciennes données, ça disparait pour moi en rechargeant la page. Les données affichées en ouvrant l'éditeur, en tout cas, devraient être les dernières disponibles.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51071558 est donc EKI et htt... | |
| 5 | 2016-05-18 07:44:31 UTC | siamak08 | Bonjour, le problème persiste toujours, il y a vraiment des anomalies. Dans certains zoom, il est écrit EKI et EKI, dans d'autre WKI en bas et EKI en haut (c'est correcte), et d'autres cas EKI en bas et WKI en haut.A mon avis c'est un problème de cache du côté du ... | |
| 39264850 by petz | 1 | 2016-05-12 13:06:23 UTC | Stereo | Hi! The previous changeset that moved the station's location said "from 13/12". The aerial imagery would therefore be out of date, and, indeed, I think that the station has been moved. last December What's your source? |
| 2 | 2016-05-12 13:46:39 UTC | petz | Source? Well, the previous location was a parking space next to the car bridge over the railways. Even on the map you can see the train station building a few hundred meters to the west. I have no other source than my own knowledge that the train station is there so if I made an error, please correc... | |
| 39214410 by Frédéric Gutkin | 1 | 2016-05-10 12:23:07 UTC | Stereo | Bonjour, bienvenue! Tu peux trouver de bien meilleures orthophotos que Bing dans l'entrée geoportail.lu du menu Imagerie. |
| 2 | 2016-05-10 15:27:46 UTC | Frédéric Gutkin | Bonjour Stereo, merci !Merci pour le tuyau, je vais dès à présent utiliser ces fonds. Puis-je utiliser les sources du geoportail sans restriction particulière ? | |
| 3 | 2016-05-11 16:18:23 UTC | Stereo | Celles qui sont dans JOSM, oui, sans aucune restriction. Il y en a sur le site web qui ne sont pas dans JOSM, et celles-là, malheureusement, on ne peut pas. | |
| 39230513 by Loll78 | 1 | 2016-05-11 09:01:22 UTC | Stereo | Welcome back :). Mir hu nei Loftbiller asw. vum Geoportal, kuck an Imagery. |
| 38915994 by WJtW | 1 | 2016-04-27 11:49:24 UTC | Stereo | Hi! The Bing images for Luxembourg are a bit old; you should have some newer ones in the JOSM imagery menu. Happy mapping! |
| 38832485 by xXMapperXx | 1 | 2016-04-25 07:36:03 UTC | Stereo | JOSM isn't easy, but it's worth it :). https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/2lweop/simpler_josm/ has a few good tips. |
| 38664322 by Joe Zack | 1 | 2016-04-19 06:42:55 UTC | Stereo | Bonjour! Super, la rue de Chiny nous manquait depuis longtemps. Elle est encore en construction, non? |
| 38478877 by xXMapperXx | 1 | 2016-04-12 08:18:42 UTC | Stereo | There's also a water layer on the inspire server that shows where all the rivers and streams go. Would you like me to configure things so you can also use it in iD? |
| 38485472 by DonKikote | 1 | 2016-04-12 08:06:56 UTC | Stereo | Hi! So the buildings are, I assume, called East and West? What's the middle bit called? |
| 38313209 by sahnemann | 1 | 2016-04-05 10:29:57 UTC | Stereo | Est-ce que les rails sont encore là? |
| 37606549 by SHARCRASH | 1 | 2016-03-31 19:27:06 UTC | Stereo | Hahaha, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38189669 |
| 2 | 2016-04-01 09:57:42 UTC | SHARCRASH | ! ! ! :O Private life exposed! Hahaha! Ca te fait marrer hein! MDR! :) Satané copy/paste qui n'a pas fait son travail... | |
| 38166804 by charel-e | 1 | 2016-03-30 16:34:58 UTC | Stereo | Congratulations on your first edits! You can also tag the street with the street name, and the houses with the house numbers. |
| 37802622 by Matlux | 1 | 2016-03-13 20:30:03 UTC | Stereo | Hi! You tagged it with foot=no. Is it a bad idea to walk there, or is it forbidden to walk there? |
| 2 | 2016-03-14 01:28:55 UTC | Matlux | Hey Stereo, As long as it's in a village it's illegal because there's a side walk. When you're outside there are metal barriers at the sides of the road. What happens on their outer side is a very rapid drop so you'd be forced to walk on the inner side of the barriers which to the best of my knowl... | |
| 3 | 2016-03-21 11:38:15 UTC | Stereo | Then it's a very bad idea to walk there, but legal. Even the emergency exit for the Tunnel Grouft is there, and anyone potentially escaping will be on foot.There aren't many places in Luxembourg where pedestrians legally can't go - typically, motorways and tunnels. They have the sign that is a r... | |
| 4 | 2016-03-21 11:38:39 UTC | Stereo | Would you like to update the CR122? I can also do it for you if you want. | |
| 5 | 2016-03-23 16:10:16 UTC | Stereo | Hi, I've unset the foot=no tag. Hope that's ok. Happy mapping! | |
| 37921628 by wilda69 | 1 | 2016-03-18 15:56:43 UTC | Stereo | Yay :) |
| 2 | 2016-03-18 17:21:03 UTC | wilda69 | Its a start ;) Noticed you had plotted the police station as "local knowledge" (do hope you kept to the speed limits), but they have moved to rue de Dudelange. Could not see who was now in that building, Dan | |
| 37689826 by aarp65 | 1 | 2016-03-09 19:21:36 UTC | Stereo | Wow. Danke für deine Mühe. |
| 37607623 by R0bst3r | 1 | 2016-03-04 13:44:49 UTC | Stereo | Stimmt, ist besser so. Danke! |
| 37386808 by SHARCRASH | 1 | 2016-02-23 11:53:47 UTC | Stereo | Si tu es dans le coin, cette note semble indiquer que le CR110 s'appelle Rue d'Esch au sud de l'intersection jusqu'à la frontière avec Esch?http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/514808#c1084068 |
| 2 | 2016-02-23 12:32:21 UTC | SHARCRASH | Je vais vérifier, je passerai par là aujourd'hui. | |
| 37103535 by freeclimber | 1 | 2016-02-09 15:20:35 UTC | Stereo | https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89mile_Mayrisch has his name with an É, and that's usually how Émile is spelled. |
| 2 | 2016-02-09 15:43:03 UTC | freeclimber | I changed this, because all the houses I did once in this street are now marked with errors in the OSM-Inspector.If you change the streetname, you have also to change ALL the houses ;-)About the É, we can discuss ;-)In the list of the postcodes, all capitals are without É (ht... | |
| 36975672 by Javier Gutiérrez | 1 | 2016-02-03 13:59:00 UTC | Stereo | Hi Javier!Fantastic work on the addresses. I assume you know http://qa.poole.ch/?zoom=17&lat=49.62&lon=6.054&layers=TTFT ?Guillaume |
| 2 | 2016-02-03 17:42:39 UTC | Javier Gutiérrez | Hi Guillaume,thanks a lot. Actually I am quite new to OSM.and I did not know about the website, really very helpful, so far I was just checking blindly by missing addresses, definitely will use this link from now on..Thanks again!Javier | |
| 36903046 by jln35 | 1 | 2016-01-31 11:08:01 UTC | Stereo | Ça sera cool quand on aura les noms de toutes les villas du cap :) |
| 36774569 by Pa413 | 1 | 2016-01-24 16:40:26 UTC | Stereo | Hello, est-ce que tu as une source pour le changement de ref=* ? Merci! |
| 2 | 2016-01-24 17:37:07 UTC | Pa413 | Bonjour à vous,alors pour l'info depuis le 1er janvier 2011, à été crée la Métropole Nice Côte-d'Azur. Par conséquent la métropole à la charge de toute la voirie à l’intérieur de son territoire. La mé... | |
| 36746876 by Amodef | 1 | 2016-01-23 15:35:53 UTC | Stereo | Hello,La définition de ville dépend du pays. Contrairement à la France, au Luxembourg, la population ne joue pas de rôle. Les villes Luxembourgeoises sont petites, mais ce sont bel et bien officiellement des villes:https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_des_villes_du_... |
| 2 | 2016-01-23 15:52:49 UTC | Amodef | Salut,Le statut légal de ville n'a, de mon point de vue, guère d'importance.Lorsque tu crées une carte régionale, avec MapBox par exemple, de gros villages / très petites villes se retrouvent au même niveau hiérarchique que de "vraies" vi... | |
| 3 | 2016-01-23 17:37:11 UTC | Stereo | Oui, ridicule, mais c'est un problème de rendu. Je pense que c'est objectivement une ville si ça en a la définition légale. Certains moteurs de rendu, utilisent le tag population=* pour choisir l'importance d'un place=* - je crois que le rendu osm-fr fait ça par ex... | |
| 4 | 2016-01-24 21:55:49 UTC | Amodef | Amha, les noms "hameau", "village", "ville", etc. d'OSM n'ont pas pour vocation d'exprimer une réalité légale, mais simplement de servir de repère hiérarchique.Sinon, comment distinguer légalement une "ville" d'une &... | |
| 36635267 by Gunstick | 1 | 2016-01-17 16:17:13 UTC | Stereo | Wars du rem moossen? |
| 36589510 by SHARCRASH | 1 | 2016-01-15 12:59:30 UTC | Stereo | Hmm, but that's tagging for the renderer if the grass isn't actually hovering in the air. |
| 2 | 2016-01-15 14:15:02 UTC | SHARCRASH | Yeah i know, my edit was a test for a "substitute" at one of OSM's flaws. Obviously you don't get what's at stake. If you don't know, sorry, OSM comments don't allow enough characters for a full explanation. I explained the most important in my changeset comment. | |
| 3 | 2016-01-15 14:19:16 UTC | SomeoneElse | @SHARCRASH I agree, it can be frustrating that OSM changeset comments don't allow more than 255 characters. However, you've always got the option (as soon as the changeset is closed) of adding a changeset discussion comment that extends it - you can explain all you like in there.Cheers,Andy | |
| 4 | 2016-01-15 21:28:30 UTC | SHARCRASH | @SomeoneElse Good idea! I will think about it for the next time. Thanks! But it's really long to explain. Stereo knows me well for the loooong communications i can write. | |
| 36402803 by Gehrke | 1 | 2016-01-06 13:20:17 UTC | Stereo | Danke! Was war da falsch? Hatte ich dieses Stück in der Relation vergessen? |
| 2 | 2016-01-06 13:21:14 UTC | Gehrke | Ja, musste noch aus einer PLZ-Relation entfernt werden. | |
| 36074434 by Javier Gutiérrez | 1 | 2015-12-21 08:40:44 UTC | Stereo | Wonderful work, you'll have all the addresses collected soon! |
| 2 | 2015-12-21 08:51:23 UTC | Javier Gutiérrez | Thank you! Happy to contribute with OSM, just a beginner for now.. | |
| 35714497 by rg4444 | 1 | 2015-12-02 21:46:16 UTC | Stereo | Cool :)Du kanns d'Landuse-Polygonen och méi grouss machen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30795579 |
| 35261003 by Hartkerius | 1 | 2015-11-27 22:12:37 UTC | Stereo | Hello! I've just mapped the garden as an area:http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35619420If you know the garden or have access to it, maybe you have the knowledge that would be necessary to add more detail. |
| 35112504 by sspan | 1 | 2015-11-06 15:45:16 UTC | Stereo | I think you accidentally deleted a part of Grand-Rue while moving the stray node. I've fixed it for you. Happy mapping! |
| 2 | 2015-11-06 19:59:35 UTC | sspan | Thanks, haven't edited anything in a long time. | |
| 35008086 by wilda69 | 1 | 2015-11-01 17:57:19 UTC | Stereo | Great :) |
| 2 | 2015-11-04 15:20:41 UTC | GerdP | please review:the tag highway=demolished is rarely used.Does it mean something like highway=construction or is it more a highway=abandoned?See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway | |
| 3 | 2015-11-04 15:22:36 UTC | GerdP | or maybe highway=dismantled? | |
| 4 | 2015-11-04 15:50:08 UTC | wilda69 | dismantled is another tag that could be used. There is so much construction going on that very little is left. The point is that there are relations still attached to them which someone needs to update, so at the mom these nodes can not be deleted. | |
| 5 | 2015-11-04 16:16:02 UTC | GerdP | okay. I try to reduce the different highway tags which mean something like "no highway", see also http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/how-to-tag-a-highway-that-doesn-t-exist-tp5857111.htmlIf I got that right, most of the ways tagged demolished will not be rebuilt (at the same place), so I'... | |
| 6 | 2015-11-04 17:28:15 UTC | Stereo | Hi! I have updated the relations Dan mentions, is there any reason we should still keep those demolished highways as highway=dismantled? | |
| 7 | 2015-11-04 17:35:01 UTC | GerdP | I prefer to remove those ways, others want to keep some kind of history in OSM,for example they build relations with names like "old interstate xyz " in the USA. | |
| 8 | 2015-11-04 18:09:20 UTC | wilda69 | Many thanks for taking care of all the relations. Difficult to judge if these roads have a historic value, but as I have not seen any plans what will happen to these after the tramcomplex has been built, it might be worth keeping them for a while. The new road looks very temporary, so there are bo... | |
| 9 | 2015-11-04 18:55:33 UTC | Stereo | This is the latest I've found:http://images.newmedia.lu/rtl2008.lu/nt/p/2014/07/07/16/0740ac7672f01e8e9b3525f0bd47c948.jpeghttp://images.newmedia.lu/rtl.lu/cms/imagegallery/2014/07/07/22496//1024//f1e236d0ea2e41899e237fdab606a4ea.jpgI think we should map what we can reliably check on the... | |
| 34996978 by c-l | 1 | 2015-10-31 19:03:37 UTC | Stereo | Hallo c-l, wilkommen in Luxemburg. Im “Imagery”-Menü von JOSM müsstest du unsere Ortho 2010 und 2013 Luftbilder, die besser als die von bing sind, haben. Happy mapping! |
| 34935367 by wilda69 | 1 | 2015-10-28 21:42:44 UTC | Stereo | Hi Dan! Is that from a survey already? |
| 2 | 2015-10-29 15:23:57 UTC | wilda69 | Hi Gerard,I was there on Monday, but it was not open yet and could not get very close. However newspaper photo suggest that the road goes parallel until the tunnel starts. Not as shown. I will investigate this on Sunday | |
| 3 | 2015-11-01 11:58:30 UTC | wilda69 | Hi Guillaume,I did a lot of plotting this morning (despite the fog), and there are some major changes in the area. Used a camera in my car to help with clues for the tunnel, and just as well as the GPS lost signal for a while. My track can be seen on OSM.1) there is a completely new temporary ... | |
| 34329656 by SHARCRASH | 1 | 2015-09-29 18:58:28 UTC | Stereo | Tiens, pour tes fixes de polygones, tu connais osmose? http://osmose.openstreetmap.lu/fr/map/#country=luxembourg&zoom=12&lat=49.5&lon=6&item=1xxx |
| 2 | 2015-09-30 08:41:51 UTC | SHARCRASH | Hello, oui je connais. :) Mais une fois que l'erreur est enregistrée, elle y reste tant que personne ne l'aura effacé d'OSMose, même si déjà corrigé entre-temps. Ca donne l'impression d'y perdre notre temps, alors OSMi m'est suffisant. A la prochaine mise &ag... | |
| 33531116 by Stereo | 1 | 2015-09-20 17:43:25 UTC | SHARCRASH | Tu as une erreur d'OSMi sur les bâtiments de la BEI (Banque euro. d'inv.): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=6.13836&lat=49.62088&zoom=17&opacity=0.95&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,rin... |
| 2 | 2015-09-21 03:55:39 UTC | Stereo | Tu as tout à fait raison, ce n'est pas le bon type de relation. Par contre, j'ai laissé ça avec trois polygones pour les trois parties, je ne vois pas l'intérêt de multipolygones ici. | |
| 3 | 2015-09-21 08:39:32 UTC | SHARCRASH | Je croyais que tu allais encore fignoler les bâtiments avec les surfaces vertes internes, sinon pas trop d'intérêt en effet. :) | |
| 34142240 by SHARCRASH | 1 | 2015-09-20 15:10:53 UTC | Stereo | Ça doit pas être facile de jongler tous tes multipolygones avec l'éditeur iD. Tu as déjà essayé JOSM? |
| 2 | 2015-09-20 17:34:03 UTC | SHARCRASH | Lorsqu'il y a beaucoup d'éléments à éditer, en effet. :) Mais dans ce cas-ci je crois qu'il s'agit d'un bug où OSMi généré n'importe quel type d'erreur lorsque 2 polygones d'un même MP se touchent sur un même node. J'ai déj&a... | |
| 34006330 by jack1968 | 1 | 2015-09-13 22:51:42 UTC | Stereo | Hi! Are you sure that's oneway? |
| 2 | 2015-09-14 17:52:11 UTC | jack1968 | Hi, it was already mapped as oneway. I modified the section to allow for bicycles in both directions. At least, that was my intention. | |
| 33269353 by p1230 | 1 | 2015-08-11 16:07:54 UTC | Stereo | Hallo! Wieso benannt? Es ist doch schon vending=cigarettes drin, und die Automaten heissen ja nicht alle Zigarettenautomat. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only |
| 2 | 2015-09-12 16:47:36 UTC | p1230 | Hi, habe deine Nachricht erst jetzt gesehen, sorry. Automaten für den Zigarettenverkauf werden doch Zigarettenautomaten genannt, daher halte ich es für richtig, sie auch so in OSM zu "taufen". Der Grund, warum ich sie aktiv so benenne ist, dass man in OSM-Anwendungen besser danac... | |
| 3 | 2015-09-13 22:09:30 UTC | Stereo | Ich würde sagen, dass die nicht so heissen, so wie eine Telefonzelle eine Telefonzelle ist aber nicht Telefonzelle heisst. Konntest du https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name lesen? | |
| 4 | 2015-09-13 22:11:54 UTC | Stereo | Hall Tabakwaren wäre in deinem Fall der operator=*, und die Zigarettenautomate so zu taggen um sie in deiner Anwendung besser zu finden ist eigentlich tagging for the renderer, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer | |
| 33315478 by peter_osm | 1 | 2015-08-14 13:28:51 UTC | Stereo | Hi Peter,It’s cool that someone is finally mapping Esch! We still have a lot of streets with no name there: http://qa.poole.ch/?layers=TTTF0B&zoom=15&lat=49.53633&lon=5.89312There's a list of the streets that are still missing in Esch at http://streetlist.openstreetmap.lu/j... |
| 32914681 by drkarsti | 1 | 2015-07-27 23:03:26 UTC | Stereo | Hi, welcome to OSM! Are these the actual names on the bus stops, and/or those used on mobiliteit.lu? |
| 2 | 2015-07-28 06:13:54 UTC | drkarsti | Hi, for "Michel Rodange" and "Etats-Unis" the names are written on a black on white sign, which is at the bus stop post. For "Ste Zithe" it is only mentioned on the schedule of the line 19, which is going there. This should be the same as on mobiliteit.lu, but I went to... | |
| 32891376 by AD06 | 1 | 2015-07-26 17:49:40 UTC | Stereo | Tu pourrais mettre name:oc comme c’est un dialecte de l’occitan. Ça serait marrant d’avoir tous les noms de rue et de faire un plan :) |
| 32804136 by Hendrikklaas | 1 | 2015-07-23 14:06:31 UTC | Stereo | Thank you for participating in our maproulette challenge in Luxembourg! |
| 32804055 by glglgl | 1 | 2015-07-22 16:13:40 UTC | Stereo | Thanks! |
| 32198747 by gcaspar | 1 | 2015-06-25 13:59:35 UTC | Stereo | IIRC ass do keng vëlosspuer/cycleway, also nëmmen oneway:bicycle=no. Brauchs du dat fir déng Navigatioun? |
| 2 | 2015-06-25 15:13:21 UTC | gcaspar | aner Einbahnstroossen an der Stad dei fir den Vëlo opp sinn goufen och esou gezeechend. wäert awer sinn dat däin oneway:bicycle=no wuel duer geet | |
| 32156463 by mistermarple | 1 | 2015-06-23 12:16:50 UTC | Stereo | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Do you know if the CR373 going into the village like this is correct? |
| 32157974 by adamos | 1 | 2015-06-23 12:11:03 UTC | Stereo | Thank you for participating in our maproulette challenge! |
| 19855048 by Stereo | 1 | 2015-06-01 04:42:40 UTC | naoliv | Stereo, I don't understand why and what you did here: you have deleted a valid route relation and, among other things, included toll=yes in every part of the highway. |
| 2 | 2015-06-13 18:08:38 UTC | Stereo | Hi Naoliv,Thank you for your comment. The route relation was wrong in many places and badly tagged; I reproduced the tags on the segments where they made sense. If you know that some segments are toll-free, the best thing to do would probably be to tag them with toll=no. | |
| 31857276 by Gunstick | 1 | 2015-06-10 06:49:12 UTC | Stereo | Do you know about http://overpass-turbo.eu ? Its wizard at the top left is great for finding things like this; try "waterway=* and tunnel = * and tunnel!=culvert in Luxembourg”I’m not sure I really understand when tunnel=culvert should not be used on a waterway. Maybe when it fl... |
| 2 | 2015-06-11 15:49:23 UTC | Gunstick | Thanks for the link! I checked other tunnel=culvert things, and I could actually stand in them, even without getting wet feet because the stream was slow. There is no real category to make a difference between a pipe and an water underpass. There are attributes for heigth and width which can be used... | |
| 31792311 by SHARCRASH | 1 | 2015-06-07 21:31:16 UTC | Stereo | The on-the-ground rule says that we only map what actually exists. If the building has been razed, it doesn’t belong in OSM. There are some historical maps projects, but none in Luxembourg as far as I know. |
| 2 | 2015-06-08 09:28:25 UTC | SHARCRASH | Logic! Thanks Stereo! | |
| 31800478 by Peda | 1 | 2015-06-07 21:25:17 UTC | Stereo | Cool, thank you! |
| 31319773 by Tom Ansay | 1 | 2015-05-20 22:16:38 UTC | Stereo | Rond-point Serra is actually the name that’s both being used by the authorities, and on the ground:http://www.fondskirchberg.lu/content.php?id=92http://www.pch.public.lu/fr/actualites/chantiers-autoroutiers/2015/a1-a7-echangeur-kirchberg-jonction-gruenewald-1/index.htmlPretty much ... |
| 2 | 2015-05-21 06:54:32 UTC | Tom Ansay | OK, I will use this logic in the future, thank you. | |
| 31319977 by Tom Ansay | 1 | 2015-05-20 22:11:48 UTC | Stereo | Moien! You can also tag the Luxembourgish names of things with the name:lb=* tag in the advanced tagging. See, for example, the Phillipsgaass nearby. |
| 2 | 2015-05-21 06:53:48 UTC | Tom Ansay | True, the Luxembourgian name is tagged as Hamilius and the name:"language code" are translations whereas "Um Aldringer" is a local name used be indigene. | |
| 31147131 by ralfherm | 1 | 2015-05-14 22:43:53 UTC | Stereo | My bad! Thank you! |
| 30349571 by gerard heinen | 1 | 2015-04-20 12:52:29 UTC | Stereo | Hello! (Moien?)Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see you have removed the steps to the train platform. How do people access the platform now?Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 30160991 by wilda69 | 1 | 2015-04-12 12:44:34 UTC | Stereo | Hi Dan! What's the luxportail kml? |
| 2 | 2015-04-12 13:23:55 UTC | wilda69 | Wow Guillaume, you are quick on this one ;)I have just posted an email to talk-lu which explains the geoportail info I received from them. | |
| 29982158 by Stereo | 1 | 2015-04-05 10:25:14 UTC | 4rch | Hello Stereo,as national boundaries are a sensitive case it would be great if you could inform the affected communities first before you apply big changes. What exactly are you modifying? We have a thread in the german subforum regarding international boundaries: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/vie... |
| 2 | 2015-04-05 12:34:04 UTC | Stereo | Hi Arch,I've replied in the forum, and will reply more later. | |
| 29958689 by Pierreletz | 1 | 2015-04-03 19:24:53 UTC | Stereo | Ech hun och um Stauséi geschafft, a hat e puer Konflikter. Has du Nodes vum Séi geläscht? |
| 29551842 by gcaspar | 1 | 2015-03-18 23:14:00 UTC | Stereo | Du hues de ganze Souterrain geläscht? |
| 2 | 2015-03-19 07:12:47 UTC | gcaspar | jo deen ass elo zou, gëtt ofgerappt and geet ergo esou ni méi op. ech wäert an den nächsten Deeg hei an och Royal och d'Sidewalks an ped. crossings propper androen fir dat den Fousweerouting klappt | |
| 28928314 by rob72 | 1 | 2015-02-18 22:21:57 UTC | Stereo | Hi! It’s actually in the direction of the way, just like oneway=yes would be. The ideal value for this tag is, of course, a percentage. Would you like to re-edit the way? |
| 2 | 2015-02-18 22:49:28 UTC | rob72 | Ok, understood. Regarding the incline percentage, there is no sign, so I have no idea. But it is enough that a few weeks ago in heavy snow I could not drive up, even with winter tires. | |
| 28164958 by rorym | 1 | 2015-01-15 23:43:49 UTC | Stereo | You’re sure you don’t want to come and check with a survey? :) |
| 28121847 by Gunstick | 1 | 2015-01-13 23:52:51 UTC | Stereo | Dat schéngt jo geklappt ze hun :D |
| 28076728 by Test360 | 1 | 2015-01-12 02:00:34 UTC | Stereo | Hi, welcome to mapping in Luxembourg!Isn’t area=yes implied for circular ways tagged highway=services? The service stations actually have addresses with “Aire de Capellen” as the street name, how do you think we should have that information if you think the tagging of the highw... |
| 2 | 2015-01-12 04:37:54 UTC | Test360 | According to the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservices , area=yes is not implied.I'm going to "Aire de Capellen" as the street name if you think it is useful.Thanks for your comment. | |
| 3 | 2015-01-12 04:50:52 UTC | Test360 | I have add the name “Aire de Capellen” on the 6 main roads of the service area.I think that naming all the road in the service area is unnecessary. Do you agree? | |
| 27207054 by Hobgoblin | 1 | 2014-12-03 20:37:47 UTC | Stereo | Above and beyond, thank you :) |
| 26903787 by rorym | 1 | 2014-11-20 10:16:35 UTC | Stereo | Now you pretty much have to come and visit to survey the tracktype :) |