Stereo participated in the following changeset discussionsStereo participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 166203199 by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale @ 2025-05-13 13:28 | 1 | 2025-06-16 22:47 | Stereo | Bonjour, attention aux noms de rue, qui ne contiennent pas d'indications comme « Bât. C » |
| 167500168 by Stereo @ 2025-06-11 16:41 | 1 | 2025-06-11 16:41 | Stereo | See also https://transports.public.lu/content/dam/transport/publications/20230207-presentation-mmtp-vdl-cfl-suppression-pn13-03-mail-tbraun-rz.pdf |
| 166632502 by Stereo @ 2025-05-22 22:53 | 1 | 2025-05-23 11:19 | user_5359 ♦19,410 | Hello! Please have a look on https://osm/way/1388890713. What is the mean of the tagsCANTON = RedangeCOMMUNE = BeckerichDISTRICT = DiekirchLAU2 = 0701(no other OSM keys)? |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 19:46 | Stereo | Oh, that's a stray from my manual conflation. Thank you for spotting it! | |
| 166435367 by TheBestIdea @ 2025-05-18 15:08 | 1 | 2025-05-18 17:37 | Stereo | You were fast! :) |
| 165335878 by Stereo @ 2025-04-23 14:05 | 1 | 2025-04-23 14:15 | Stereo | Sorry, wrong changeset comment! This was adding a ghost bike from survey. |
| 164202027 by SDimona @ 2025-03-28 10:56 | 1 | 2025-04-09 15:17 | Stereo | Hallo SDimona! Auf dem Straßenschild stand vor ein paar Jahren "Hiehl", und im Kadaster war es falsch. Hat sich das geändert? In der Zwischenzeit hab ich das auf "Hiehl" ver(schlimm)bessert. |
| 2 | 2025-04-10 12:32 | SDimona ♦4 | Hallo Stereo,die Schreibweise ohne h im Straßennamen erschien mir richtig und führten zur Änderung. Siehe hierzu z.B. die nachfolgenden Adressen.Geoportal von Luxemburghttps://map.geoportail.lu/theme/main?zoom=18&X=691854&Y=6380209&layers=152&bgLayer=basem... | |
| 162674412 by JeroenvanderGun @ 2025-02-18 19:26 | 1 | 2025-02-21 20:37 | Stereo | Hi Jeroen! Multilingualism in Luxembourg is a bit of a mess. The official name of the commune that's also used in government open data is Groussbus-Wal, so that's what we've used. I use it for street name completion QA checks, so I'll change it back. |
| 2 | 2025-02-21 21:07 | JeroenvanderGun ♦182 | Thanks! You are correct, apparently they switched to Luxembourgish when the municipalities of Grosbous and Wahl were merged: https://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2023/03/03/a115/joI think name is equal to name:fr for all other municipalities, so I guess this is exceptional? | |
| 3 | 2025-02-21 23:03 | Stereo | It’s definitely the exception, and it’s only a thing for “new” municipalities. Another example off the top of my head is Käerjeng which doesn't really have a French translation. | |
| 156074389 by škoda109e @ 2024-09-01 23:08 | 1 | 2024-09-11 18:15 | Stereo | Hello! This looks like an automated edit that broke at least one name. Can you please share your methods? |
| 156277566 by Michael Montani @ 2024-09-06 14:16 | 1 | 2024-09-06 14:16 | Stereo | Nice talk ;) |
| 155692980 by FvGordon @ 2024-08-24 12:09 | 1 | 2024-09-04 04:46 | Stereo | Danke dir! |
| 154889924 by mueschel @ 2024-08-06 11:58 | 1 | 2024-08-14 05:55 | Stereo | Ahh, thank you for that! |
| 155060124 by Philippe Arts @ 2024-08-10 12:18 | 1 | 2024-08-12 13:52 | Stereo | Moien! Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and congratulations on your first edit. |
| 152759604 by Luke_Vader @ 2024-06-16 12:56 | 1 | 2024-07-29 16:13 | Stereo | Cool use of MapWarper! Nice job! |
| 2 | 2024-09-19 13:14 | Luke_Vader ♦1 | Thanks :)I'm trying to keep Luxembourg city up to date, whenever i have time. | |
| 146794967 by Stereo @ 2024-01-28 20:52 | 1 | 2024-01-28 20:55 | Stereo | Used Strava too for the Bramley summit trail |
| 145318877 by Stereo @ 2023-12-20 07:22 | 1 | 2024-01-05 20:47 | TheBestIdea ♦110 | Hey Guillaume,This block of McGuinness (Green to Freeman) is in fact now 2way for bikes. I've surveyed it. I'm going to revert this.Brandon |
| 2 | 2024-01-05 21:04 | Stereo | Hi Brandon! Indeed, it is now. Thank you! | |
| 144851296 by Stereo @ 2023-12-07 03:52 | 1 | 2023-12-09 22:41 | akadouri ♦58 | "loc_name"="Sauron Tower" 🤔 |
| 2 | 2023-12-10 03:20 | Stereo | If you search for “Sauron tower Brooklyn” it’s pretty clear. | |
| 144626216 by harisag96 @ 2023-11-30 13:49 | 1 | 2023-12-05 17:47 | Stereo | Willkommen in der OpenStreetMap-Community! Es ist großartig zu sehen, dass du dich aktiv beteiligst und bei der Kartierung hilfst. Ich habe bemerkt, dass du bei einigen Namen die deutsche Version hinzugefügt hast, was eine wertvolle Ergänzung ist. Ich möchte dir einige freundlic... |
| 142000761 by hdevine825 @ 2023-10-01 18:49 | 1 | 2023-10-20 02:15 | Stereo | Thank you for fixing the sidewalks I'd accidentally tagged as crossings! |
| 117022615 by stepps00 @ 2022-02-04 21:13 | 1 | 2023-10-11 15:14 | Stereo | Hi! Lepa Brena is the local name for this building: https://oralhistorykosovo.org/points_of_interests/elektro-kosova-lena-brena/ |
| 173897 by woodpeck @ 2006-12-28 11:40 | 1 | 2023-10-06 20:30 | Stereo | Welcome aboard woodpeck!Your additions help making the map more accurate and useful for everyone. There are two practices that can significantly enhance the quality of your contributions: providing clear changeset comments and maintaining a concise bounding box (bbox) for your changesets.Cha... |
| 2 | 2023-10-06 20:36 | woodpeck ♦2,430 | Hey Guillaume, thank you, I'm still getting the knack of this OSM thing. Can you show me where I enter the changeset comment? I have JSOM build 422 on Java SE5. Do I need to upgrade? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-07 09:31 | dieterdreist ♦842 | if you don’t want to upgrade you should still patch your version so you can add these comments, but upgrading could likely save you some sweat and tears… | |
| 2 | 2023-09-12 20:29 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hello,Andy from the DWG here. Surely some of these "cliffs" or "not-cliffs" must be visible from below, and someone can provide a photograph?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 3 | 2023-09-13 15:12 | Stereo | I see three questions here.1. Are there cliffs?Yes. The area is known for its cliffs which sometimes roll down to the houses.https://lequotidien.lu/tag/tawioun/https://www.virgule.lu/luxembourg/eboulements-a-luxembourg-certains-quartiers-plus-menaces-que-d-autres/135717.htmlI hav... | |
| 4 | 2023-09-16 12:07 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Most were answered, thanks!I had wondered how to express complex 3D cliffs on 2D. Sometimes certain portions are not vertical but are certainly steep and we could slip down, therefore dangerous, other cliffs are stepped with various heights. There is a discussion in the Wiki trying to classify ... | |
| 113573587 by rossch @ 2021-11-09 16:50 | 1 | 2023-06-27 14:33 | Stereo | Hi Rossch,Do you maybe remember where you found the address of "22 Schullstrooss" for the FC Berdenia Berbourg stadium clubhouse? I can't find a trace of this address anywhere else.Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 2 | 2023-06-27 15:13 | rossch ♦1 | Hi Guillaume,good, question, I'll ask the club because at this time I'm also unable to find my source. | |
| 136548156 by friend698 @ 2023-05-25 15:01 | 1 | 2023-05-26 05:18 | Udarian ♦411 | I dont know Baltimore but I doubt that this building is here. This seams like vandalism --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136548156 |
| 2 | 2023-05-26 16:52 | Stereo | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136597102 | |
| 130462073 by m sartor @ 2022-12-24 16:45 | 1 | 2022-12-24 21:29 | Stereo | War ech fir ee mol méi séier? :)De Wutz um Belval tëscht Lift an avenue des sidérurgistes sinn ech wierklech net 100% sécher, wann s du do ee mol laanscht fiers. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130... |
| 2 | 2022-12-24 22:49 | m sartor ♦7 | Sinn haut driwwer gefuer, hat bis lo naicht agedroen well ech keng genee Donnéen hat, hu lo haut effektiv gesinn dass dat Steck um Belval net 100% richteg ass mee fir de Moment geet et mol duer. Merci dass de dat do mol agedroen hues. Bei der nächster Fahrt zeechnen ech et mam gps op, de... | |
| 3 | 2023-01-13 19:19 | Stereo | Vill Gléck am neie Joer! Dei nei Loftbiller vun 2022 sinn eraus, an ech hunn deementspriechend schon e bëssen ajustéiert. Vill Spaass :) | |
| 4 | 2023-01-13 21:49 | m sartor ♦7 | Däer och vill Gléck gewenscht!, Hat leider nach keng Meiglechkeet fir nach eng keier driwwer ze fueren ergo et unzepassen. Wousst net dass Ufanks des Joers nei Loftbiller kommen. Merci fir d'Adaptéieren | |
| 130835129 by MaffyMaps @ 2023-01-03 17:07 | 1 | 2023-01-13 19:18 | Stereo | Hi (Moien?), welcome to OSM! Congratulations on making your first edits, and well done on starting with JOSM right away. Don't hesitate if you have any questions, and happy mapping.Guillaume |
| 130584804 by AVL_FLI_KA @ 2022-12-28 06:46 | 1 | 2023-01-13 19:01 | Stereo | Déi nei Loftbiller vun 2022 sinn elo eraus, vill Spaass :) |
| 128848846 by Lyon-St-Clair @ 2022-11-13 14:10 | 1 | 2023-01-11 05:15 | Stereo | Hello, bonne année ! Les nouvelles photos de 2022 viennent de sortir, il y a plein d'alignements de tram qui sont devenus possibles :) |
| 124700806 by Stereo @ 2022-08-09 19:40 | 1 | 2022-12-02 18:52 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | Hello Stereo,You've added a lot of crossing:marking=no on crossings which have zebra markings according to aerial imagery (they are also tagged with crossing_ref=zebra). Assuming you were tagging their colour, you should probably use crossing:markings:colour.Best regards,Dimitar |
| 2 | 2022-12-03 12:52 | Stereo | Здравейте Dimitar! Yes, that tag didn't exist yet back then. It's probably ripe for a mechanical edit in Luxembourg. | |
| 3 | 2022-12-03 21:01 | Stereo | Actually, looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:markings, it looks like that tag is for the lines itself, not the background colour. | |
| 4 | 2022-12-03 21:54 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | Would crossing:markings=zebra:bicolour + crossing:markings:colour=red work? | |
| 127960638 by VLD549 @ 2022-10-23 14:44 | 1 | 2022-10-24 16:52 | Stereo | Hi Tom,As I was writing in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119803171:> The street sign at the intersection says Haardterwee in one word. The cadastre, unhelpfully, has Haardterwee in its address database and Haardter Wee on its maps. Linguistically, I think two words is correct.... |
| 2 | 2022-11-01 15:21 | VLD549 ♦287 | I see, ok thank you for the response. Let's go with your result: "Haardterwee" | |
| 127018893 by Deoniss @ 2022-10-04 22:40 | 1 | 2022-10-09 11:12 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Hi! Sorry to hear that you had problems because a contributor misinformed users. I warned the DWG moderators of that user (ex tomolobla now visible as user_3961358) but I've been the one who had been blocked even though i provided proofs. Go figure out why some people do not admit they are wron... |
| 2 | 2022-10-09 11:15 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | FYI : the rendering of path will show up soon in OSM, leave it some time because it takes more time when a previous edit had been done recently in the location (yours). | |
| 3 | 2022-10-10 12:21 | Deoniss ♦1 | thank you very much. Road and address rue Alf 11,13. But I still see 9,11,13 rue Kahlenbeerch on this house they have not disappeared. The rest is perfect. Thanks. I edited for the first time in osm | |
| 4 | 2022-10-11 17:13 | Stereo | Hi Deoniss! Congratulations on your first edit. I have now removed 9,11,13 rue Kahlenbeerch. They appear in the official data, but you're saying they don't exist at all on the ground? | |
| 5 | 2022-10-12 12:16 | Deoniss ♦1 | Thank you so much for your kindness. Yes, these addresses are not, I know for sure because I live here. Maybe it was in the past, I don't know. There was an old building here, it was demolished, but my house was built on its foundation. This is what they told me - fonds du logement. Thanks... | |
| 126753589 by piona @ 2022-09-28 19:38 | 1 | 2022-09-30 22:36 | Stereo | Hi Piona! Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and congratulations on your first edit.Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 126822492 by VLD549 @ 2022-09-30 12:56 | 1 | 2022-09-30 17:25 | Stereo | I do object to #nl :) |
| 2 | 2022-10-07 12:01 | VLD548 ♦20 | I agree to use the spelling Haardter Wee. Thanks. | |
| 119803171 by Stereo @ 2022-04-17 03:39 | 1 | 2022-09-30 12:56 | VLD549 ♦287 | Hi, could you indicate where you got the name change from? Many sites seem to use Haardter Wee as spelling. Thank you.https://lux.postcodebase.com/node/8009 |
| 2 | 2022-09-30 17:08 | Stereo | Hi! The street sign at the intersection says Haardterwee in one word. The cadastre, unhelpfully, has Haardterwee in its address database and Haardter Wee on its maps. Linguistically, I think two words is correct.Would you be ok with "Haardter Wee" as an alt_name? | |
| 3 | 2022-10-07 12:32 | VLD548 ♦20 | Spelling of Haardter Wee is ok. Thanks. | |
| 124835156 by ViTiS57 @ 2022-08-12 21:43 | 1 | 2022-08-14 19:47 | Stereo | Hello ViTiS57! Est-ce que tu es certain que la place de Durbuy a perdu son nom? J'imagine qu'un tas de choses a changé sur place avec le chantier, mais d'après les sources que j'ai pu consulter, c'est encore les numéros 3-11 place de Durbuy le long de ce... |
| 2 | 2022-08-14 20:14 | ViTiS57 ♦2 | Salut, d’après la carte dispo sur vdl.lu ça serait bien rue d’Orchimont. | |
| 124076638 by TheFrenchy @ 2022-07-26 05:17 | 1 | 2022-07-27 18:14 | Stereo | Hello! C'est ce nom là qui a été voté par la Ville? |
| 2 | 2022-07-27 18:17 | TheFrenchy ♦1 | Oui, ils ont décidé d’utiliser l’orthographe ukrainienne à la place de la russe initialement choisie. https://www.wort.lu/fr/luxembourg/bonnevoie-aura-finalement-un-boulevard-de-kyiv-62dacaf6de135b923610064b | |
| 3 | 2022-07-27 18:19 | Stereo | Super, merci pour l'article ! | |
| 122779676 by 3qH4 @ 2022-06-24 01:25 | 1 | 2022-07-25 03:36 | Stereo | Hi 3qH4! Be careful, you dropped some street names here. |
| 122075186 by PortAuthority @ 2022-06-07 14:23 | 1 | 2022-06-09 23:16 | Stereo | Hello Umar and Port Authority, welcome to OpenStreetMap and congratulations on your first edit! |
| 120399304 by indeko @ 2022-04-30 20:43 | 1 | 2022-06-05 20:14 | Stereo | Hi Indeko! I'm not sure what happened, but it looks like you've added "1, am Dall" as house number for a few addresses. I'll fix it for you. Happy mapping! |
| 2 | 2022-06-06 19:45 | indeko ♦3 | This is of course wrong. But I don't know how this error occurred, I only wanted to enter the normal house numbers. | |
| 3 | 2022-06-06 19:50 | indeko ♦3 | On my edit screen the house numbers are correct and I can't improve them, I don't know where the error is. :-( | |
| 4 | 2022-06-07 13:46 | Stereo | Maybe a copy-paste gone wrong? You can't fix it because I'd already fixed it :). | |
| 117661074 by Stereo @ 2022-02-21 03:43 | 1 | 2022-04-03 11:59 | Lyon-St-Clair ♦107 | If it's you using highway=busway, please, stop it : the road disappear with this and it's problematic. Use highway=service + psv=yes + bus=yes instad. And busway refers to BRT, but Luxembourg doesn't have BRT. |
| 2 | 2022-05-28 13:53 | Stereo | Sorry I missed your comment. Works for me! | |
| 3 | 2022-05-28 13:53 | Stereo | I mean, tagging as highway=service and psv=yes and bus=yes instead of highway=busway works for me. | |
| 4 | 2022-05-29 17:55 | Lyon-St-Clair ♦107 | No problem, thanks! | |
| 117507313 by Stereo @ 2022-02-17 08:04 | 1 | 2022-05-19 19:16 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | The lights/crossings you separated are not right. The car traffic lights are not at the stop, they are at level of the crossing. In extra it complicates the data and eye visualisation (same info in different spots is worse than same info at the same spot). |
| 2 | 2022-05-27 23:33 | Stereo | Usage as documented on wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signalsThe data is consumed in that form by zug.lu | |
| 117996721 by Boggedy @ 2022-03-01 22:14 | 1 | 2022-03-29 05:16 | Stereo | You're famous for adding the two millionth building in Ireland: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%E1%9A%9B%E1%9A%90%E1%9A%8B%E1%9A%90%E1%9A%85%E1%9A%87%E1%9A%90%E1%9A%9C%20%F0%9F%8F%B3%EF%B8%8F%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8C%88/diary/398897 |
| 2 | 2022-05-15 19:34 | Boggedy ♦8 | @Stereo I am infamous you mean. | |
| 110841 by Tordanik @ 2008-02-12 21:14 | 1 | 2022-02-27 12:17 | Stereo | Hello Tordanik and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Good changeset comments make mapping easier and better for us all; please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_commentsHappy mapping,Guillaume |
| 117568153 by Lxfly @ 2022-02-18 14:36 | 1 | 2022-02-18 19:40 | Stereo | Hi (Moien?) Lxfly! Your changeset comments are usually quite minimal. More detailed comments help us all create a better map. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .Happy mapping!Guillaume |
| 117572263 by m sartor @ 2022-02-18 16:14 | 1 | 2022-02-18 19:37 | Stereo | Oh that should be a fun climb ;) |
| 117090123 by ViTiS57 @ 2022-02-06 18:22 | 1 | 2022-02-17 07:55 | Stereo | Tu as l'œuil fin, bien vu pour le chantier du tram! |
| 116866585 by XY22 @ 2022-02-01 12:29 | 1 | 2022-02-01 18:26 | Stereo | Das ging schnell :) |
| 90127878 by spuseldange @ 2020-08-29 18:49 | 1 | 2022-01-30 00:08 | Stereo | Moien! D'Weichen hu geännert, wou has du deemols d'Referenznummere fonnt? Merci a schéine Weekend, Guillaume |
| 116580266 by Curausu @ 2022-01-25 11:10 | 1 | 2022-01-26 15:13 | Stereo | Hi Curausu,There was an advanced project to build a railway there, and I thought `raiway=abandoned` was the best description for it - the railway project was abandoned. The infrastructure work like the cutting is still very visible on the ground.Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 112382292 by Stereo @ 2021-10-11 16:26 | 1 | 2021-10-18 22:24 | b-jazz ♦663 | Hey Stereo, the pedestrian stairs from street level up to bridge level need to be split so that the way doesn't cross over itself, which is topologically incorrect. If you look at my changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111830687), you'll see what I'm talking about. Can ... |
| 2 | 2021-10-18 22:27 | Stereo | Ah! I'll count the steps on all bits to tag them separately so we can both be happy. The way intersects itself but there is no connecting node, so I think this is a false positive from OSMI. | |
| 3 | 2021-10-23 17:52 | b-jazz ♦663 | I'm not sure what change you're going to make to make us both be happy. If it has already happened, it isn't correct IMO. Ways shouldn't cross over themselves. They should be split and the layer attribute should be set appropriately. I don't consider this a false positive fo... | |
| 109398530 by SHARCRASH @ 2021-08-09 10:42 | 1 | 2021-08-21 14:24 | Stereo | Attention, il y a une partie du P&R de Pétange qui a sauté. |
| 2 | 2021-08-21 21:19 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Je n'y ai pas touché sur ce changeset, j'ai surtout retravaillé les anciennes zones industrielles FR car il y a des nouvelles pistes cyclables par là. J'ai juste retouché le landuse=railway coté LU qui s'étend jusqu'à Pé... | |
| 83439186 by dmlu @ 2020-04-12 21:00 | 1 | 2020-04-12 21:02 | Stereo | Just to confirm that this was discussed for a long time on the OSM Luxembourg irc channel, and that it's a very cool changeset :) |
| 2 | 2020-04-12 21:10 | dmlu ♦164 | Thank you! As a side note, I'll be making my script available when I get some time to mainstream the process. I'll leave a comment here with the link :) | |
| 3 | 2021-08-09 05:22 | Stereo | You never posted your script :) | |
| 98285850 by monsite @ 2021-01-28 09:57 | 1 | 2021-08-07 23:37 | Stereo | Bonjour,L'adresse dans la base du Cadastre et le nom de la rue sur le panneau sont « Op Zaemer ». C'est donc le nom de rue que nous utilisons sur OSM. Est-ce que vous avez vu un autre nom sur le terrain?Bon weekend!Guillaume |
| 107785585 by cicerus @ 2021-07-11 14:43 | 1 | 2021-07-11 15:07 | Stereo | Hi (Moien?) cicerus, congratulations on your first edit and welcome to OpenStreetMap! |
| 2 | 2021-07-12 08:13 | cicerus ♦1 | Thanks :) | |
| 107646928 by EcodaV @ 2021-07-08 15:39 | 1 | 2021-07-08 16:03 | Stereo | Bonjour (Moien?),Bienvenue et félicitations pour votre première contribution! N'hésitez pas à m'envoyer un message si vous avez des questions.Bonne cartographie,Guillaume |
| 107191812 by yhuberty @ 2021-06-30 08:20 | 1 | 2021-07-01 21:26 | Stereo | Moien yhuberty,Wëlkomm, a bravo fir däin éichten Edit!Vill Spaass beim Mappen an där schéiner Géigend.Guillaume |
| 107016221 by Kaweechelchen @ 2021-06-26 20:31 | 1 | 2021-06-28 09:41 | Stereo | Fixed! |
| 106591658 by foxandpotatoes @ 2021-06-18 13:44 | 1 | 2021-06-18 17:07 | Stereo | Hello! Wow, tu vois ça sur les photos de 2019? Avec les marqueurs? |
| 2 | 2021-06-18 18:24 | foxandpotatoes ♦18 | Voir https://map.geoportail.lu/, orthophoto de 2001. Les terrassements sont bien visibles. Je cherche le tracé du gazoduc Berneau - B | |
| 3 | 2021-06-18 18:24 | foxandpotatoes ♦18 | ... Bastogne - Bras. Mais je n' | |
| 4 | 2021-06-18 18:26 | foxandpotatoes ♦18 | ... zut ! ... je n'ai pas trouvé.Reste à trouver Pommerloch vers Luxembourg !Bien à toi.Pierre P. | |
| 106416648 by Friendly_Ghost @ 2021-06-15 17:44 | 1 | 2021-06-15 22:50 | Stereo | Hello friendly ghost!Taginfo should be fixed in cases like this. See https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/issues/129 for the same bug in Osmose. '+' is a valid character to have in a tag.In this particular case, the Memor II+ system was completely retired at the end of 2020, an... |
| 2 | 2021-06-17 16:36 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | Hi Guillaume,Thank you for bringing this to my attention. This was a very rare key, and as such I already regarded it as either a mistake or as obsolete. Kind regards,Casper | |
| 102259134 by EUMapper @ 2021-04-04 07:12 | 1 | 2021-06-02 10:39 | Stereo | Hi EUMapper! Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24579889 was blocked on the Western leg like you mapped? On the new 2020 aerial imagery, it's blocked on the eastern side of that intersection, which I've now mapped at osm.org/node/8791604891Happy mappingGuillaume |
| 103931957 by Gunstick @ 2021-04-30 19:17 | 1 | 2021-05-03 10:25 | Stereo | Salut, irgendwéi ass erëm eng Adresse op enger Trap gefall. |
| 96495925 by m sartor @ 2020-12-27 19:21 | 1 | 2021-05-02 21:12 | Stereo | Du wars erëm méi séier wi ech :) |
| 101881586 by tоmоlоbla @ 2021-03-28 16:43 | 1 | 2021-04-29 21:38 | Stereo | Ech erëm :)Di "Impasse Saint-Antoine" mécht mech e besse geckeg, well ech näicht dozou fannen. Gëtt et tatsächlech e Passage op der Nordsäit fir eriwwer op d'Esplanade? Ass eng Borne fir de Wee an d'Foussgängerzone ze spären?Ech s... |
| 2 | 2021-04-30 07:17 | tоmоlоbla ♦38 | Jo déi kléng Gaassen sin vill Aarbescht ;) Et war souwäit alles ok, Accèsen och. Misst lo méi däitlech sin. | |
| 103729145 by tоmоlоbla @ 2021-04-27 19:51 | 1 | 2021-04-29 20:56 | Stereo | Salut Tom! Wees du nach, op https://osm.org/way/936029050 sur place war? De CACLR huet nähmlech 16 als Hausnummer.Kënns du irgendwann erëm am Chat schnëssen?Vill Spaass,Guillaume |
| 2 | 2021-04-30 05:42 | tоmоlоbla ♦38 | Salut,War effektiv e Feeler vu mir. | |
| 99323840 by swift11 @ 2021-02-15 17:01 | 1 | 2021-04-28 15:08 | Stereo | Just to let you know that you adding this vaccination centre was useful for me. Thank you! |
| 45771453 by Stereo_repair @ 2017-02-03 08:34 | 1 | 2021-03-19 20:07 | trial ♦870 | Bonjour, il sermble que la réparation se soit mal apssée : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3078971557/history on voit que le name était resté (et a été supprimé ensuite à la main). Ça vaut sans doute le coup de relancer une requê... |
| 2 | 2021-04-06 12:42 | Stereo | Zut zut zut. Merci d'avoir remarqué ça. | |
| 3 | 2021-04-06 12:43 | Stereo | En regardant le node que tu signales, je vois que le tag 'name' était déjà présent avant l'édition de masse et sa réparation. Mais ça vaudrait en effet le coup de nettoyer systématiquement les name=Platane, name=Sapin, etc. - peu... | |
| 4 | 2021-04-06 18:47 | trial ♦870 | Ah, il avait commencé les dégâts avant alors :-(. Je pense que dans ce cas une édition mécanique est aussi indiquée qu'Osmose : y a-t-il des exceptions ou le nom commun est le nom propre ?https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/48.39123/-4.48736 : il en ... | |
| 102341340 by Jol65 @ 2021-04-05 14:35 | 1 | 2021-04-05 15:07 | Stereo | Hello Jol65 and congratulations on your first edit! Do you know if it's blocked for construction or definitively? |
| 2 | 2021-04-05 16:07 | Jol65 ♦1 | It is blocked temporarily, there is no sign however until when. From the construction, I would say at least 6 weeks. The diversion is easy (up, then down) | |
| 102061661 by julien91 @ 2021-03-31 14:20 | 1 | 2021-04-01 15:57 | Stereo | Félicitations pour ta première modification, et bienvenue sur OSM! :) |
| 102041306 by Lxfly @ 2021-03-31 09:06 | 1 | 2021-03-31 23:04 | Stereo | Hello! So if I understand correctly, the bridge is done, but the tunnel isn't connected yet? I've tried to improve your mapping a bit, please see if it's correct. We should have the 2020 images in a few days, which will hopefully make drawing this easier.Happy mapping!Guillaum... |
| 2 | 2021-04-01 06:46 | Lxfly ♦4 | Shell pass today or tomorrow on this place and check the present situation. Got the information that bridge is open from LW newspaper.René | |
| 101487963 by B-Rabbit @ 2021-03-22 09:10 | 1 | 2021-03-23 12:46 | Stereo | Hi B-Rabbit! Did you actually survey this on the ground? It was my impression that at least some of the machines would be kept for tickets for the greater region. |
| 2 | 2021-03-24 06:05 | B-Rabbit ♦16 | Hi Stereo. No, I did not survey this on the ground but I work for the company which operated the TVM's. The Verkéiersverbond stopped operation of their TVM's by end of 2020 and soon after that all of them were dismounted. The LuxTram TVM's were also dismounted (they stopped ope... | |
| 96689307 by Florimondable @ 2020-12-30 20:24 | 1 | 2021-03-15 00:51 | Stereo | Hi! I'm not familiar with mountain range relations and don't want to break anything, but it looks like your multipolygon could be one way. Also, the Ardennes region of Luxembourg is only North of the Sure. |
| 2 | 2021-03-15 18:27 | Florimondable ♦126 | Hi, me either, how the multipolygon could be oneway ?About the Ardennes region of Luxembourg, the relation is about the mountain range, so it’s a topological-geological geography not a political border. Though I’m not an expert at all about the border of this mountain range. | |
| 100367522 by wilda69 @ 2021-03-03 17:43 | 1 | 2021-03-03 23:44 | Stereo | Hi Dan! Be careful, the boundaries on the topographical map are a simplification. The exact administrative are on data.public.lu and, in this case, have been imported.Happy mapping, hope you're well!Guillaume |
| 2 | 2021-03-04 12:32 | wilda69 ♦28 | Hi Guillaume. Good to hear from you again. Did not realise this info from geoportal disagrees with data.public.lu. As I dont see there is a way of accessing the latter without being a subscriber I will not be able to correct, so will have to wait for another import or have you change it back. Glad... | |
| 3 | 2021-03-05 18:14 | wilda69 ♦28 | Thanks for the changes! | |
| 100332768 by pepsisziget @ 2021-03-03 08:46 | 1 | 2021-03-03 23:33 | Stereo | Moien and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Congratulations on your impressive start. Please contact me if you have any questions.Hope you have fun mapping!Guillaume |
| 100148451 by Luxtux @ 2021-02-28 17:41 | 1 | 2021-02-28 18:08 | Stereo | Moien, welcome to OpenStreetMap, and congratulations on your first edit! |
| 100000000 by Lamine Ndiaye @ 2021-02-25 19:29 | 1 | 2021-02-25 19:29 | FinB2000 ♦13 | Congratulations on getting changeset 100,000,000! |
| 2 | 2021-02-25 19:29 | tungster ♦7 | 100 MILLION LET'S F****** GOOOOOOOOOO | |
| 3 | 2021-02-25 19:29 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 ♦363 | Congratulations! | |
| 4 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | ycool ♦4 | YES! | |
| 5 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | mneko ♦9 | lucky changeset! | |
| 6 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | ottwiz ♦385 | Congratulations! | |
| 7 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | mDav ♦6 | YAHOOOOO!!!!!!!! <3 <3 Viva La OSM! | |
| 8 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Stereo | Félicitation pour le 100 millionième changement sur OpenStreetMap!! | |
| 9 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Incredible! Here's to 100 million more. | |
| 10 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Palolo ♦457 | Good job | |
| 11 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦712 | Congratulations! | |
| 12 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Enock4seth ♦548 | Whoopiii!! | |
| 13 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | syntex ♦829 | Congratulations! | |
| 14 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | fghj753 ♦53 | 100000000 !!! | |
| 15 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | VLD085 ♦2 | Awesome!!!!!!! | |
| 16 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | JriSv250 ♦31 | Congratulations! You managed to do the 100,000,000 changeset! | |
| 17 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Robot8A ♦69 | 🎉 | |
| 18 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Mannivu ♦215 | Changeset #100,000,000, congratulations! | |
| 19 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | overflorian ♦49 | Wonderfull changeset ! Congrat | |
| 20 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Kachkaev ♦23 | 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉GO OSM!!!🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 21 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Domkot_UA Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 22 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | don-vip ♦11 | Congratulations!!! | |
| 23 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Michael Montani ♦5 | Congratulations Lamine! Thank you for the Wolof lesson before :) | |
| 24 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Steve ♦1 | woo! | |
| 25 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | GeoMechain ♦26 | Congratulations !! | |
| 26 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | LorenzoStucchi ♦129 | 🎉🎉🎉 congrats!! | |
| 27 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | Kovoschiz ♦2,543 | Oh god this is going to be the most changeset comment ever | |
| 28 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | cafeconleche ♦19 | Congratulations! | |
| 29 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | BubbaJuice ♦125 | 🎉 | |
| 30 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | freeExec ♦628 | 0/ | |
| 31 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | sandeman_13 ♦2 | 100M :D | |
| 32 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | ToniE ♦1,233 | You've got it! Congrats! | |
| 33 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | Kateregga1 ♦17 | Congratulations Lamine!!!! | |
| 34 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | rouelibre1 ♦5 | Wohooooooooooooooooooooooo! Bravo !!! C'est génial ! | |
| 35 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | FinB2000 ♦13 | I think this changeset has the WORLD RECORD for the most comments! | |
| 36 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | Johnny Mapperseed ♦99 | Congratulations! - And thanks for mapping Senegal! | |
| 37 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | gendy54 ♦584 | Félicitations. En plus un contributeur francophone ! | |
| 38 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | LivingWithDragons ♦52 | Well done, and if you're not aware you can claim a prize for making the 100 millionth changeset in OSM. Contact the people that run WeeklyOSM. | |
| 39 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | Sammyhawkrad ♦87 | Congratulations!!! | |
| 40 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | kkowalsky ♦1 | !!!!!! 100,000,000 !!!!!!! | |
| 41 | 2021-02-25 19:34 | Immaculate Mwanja ♦1 | 💃💃💃yesss! 100M | |
| 42 | 2021-02-25 19:34 | dmlu ♦164 | Félicitations!🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 43 | 2021-02-25 19:34 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | Congrats on mapping changeset 100,000,000 !!! | |
| 44 | 2021-02-25 19:35 | Dawid2849 ♦712 | Congrats! | |
| 45 | 2021-02-25 19:35 | Julian S ♦4 | Amazing, congrats, and congrats to the whole OSM community for this amazing and weird thing we've built! :) | |
| 46 | 2021-02-25 19:35 | *Martin* ♦641 | Congrats!https://www.facebook.com/FreemapSlovakia/posts/3864774783568639 | |
| 47 | 2021-02-25 19:36 | osmer120311 ♦14 | You did it! Congrats! OSM FOREVER!!! | |
| 48 | 2021-02-25 19:36 | Mxdanger ♦77 | This is quite the achievement. | |
| 49 | 2021-02-25 19:36 | Laura Mugeha ♦4 | 🙌🏿🙌🏿🙌🏿 | |
| 50 | 2021-02-25 19:37 | Bexhill-OSM ♦95 | 👍🏻 nice | |
| 51 | 2021-02-25 19:37 | Darrell ♦5 | Congratulations! ✊ | |
| 52 | 2021-02-25 19:38 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Congratulations! | |
| 53 | 2021-02-25 19:38 | MAPconcierge ♦6 | Congratulations!!!!!!!! :-) | |
| 54 | 2021-02-25 19:39 | श्र ♦4 | Yay! Congrats! | |
| 55 | 2021-02-25 19:41 | Ndangane ♦3 | Félicitations !Un contributeur Sénégalais à l’honneur. J'espère qu'il sera reçu par Macky Sall.Et c'est un petit village de brousse nommé Nianiane qui lui a porté bonheur.Congratulations ! | |
| 56 | 2021-02-25 19:42 | Mashin ♦562 | First! .. oh man not again :(Congratz! | |
| 57 | 2021-02-25 19:42 | Jrachi ♦769 | Evviva! 1000000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | |
| 58 | 2021-02-25 19:44 | Ben Abelshausen ♦14 | Yay! Senegal for the win! :) | |
| 59 | 2021-02-25 19:45 | CharliePlett ♦20 | Congrats on the 100 mil! | |
| 60 | 2021-02-25 19:45 | geoJenn ♦8 | Congratulations!!! 🎉🥳 | |
| 61 | 2021-02-25 19:48 | UNGSC-isoipsa ♦5 | Congratulations!!!🎉 | |
| 62 | 2021-02-25 19:50 | BASHIZI CIKURU Christian ♦1 | Congratulations😃 | |
| 63 | 2021-02-25 19:51 | E de Wit ♦231 | Lets pay respect to his inbox exploding. :)Also congratulations to the whole community on getting to 100 mil edits. May there be many more. | |
| 64 | 2021-02-25 19:52 | puzzled ♦1 | Congratulations to you and the Senegal :D | |
| 65 | 2021-02-25 19:53 | CapitaineMoustache ♦44 | Congratulations!🎉Félicitations Lamine ! Le Sénégal en fête !Contactez l'équipe de WeeklyOSM pour recevoir votre prix ! | |
| 66 | 2021-02-25 19:57 | Negreheb ♦263 | I looked at your blog post and want to thank you for the work you are doing in afrika! I compared this region with google and its amazing to see OSM is way better than Google. All the best from austria! | |
| 67 | 2021-02-25 20:04 | HeyItsAdam ♦41 | Very nice | |
| 68 | 2021-02-25 20:08 | annofgreenlake ♦1 | Go Senegal! | |
| 69 | 2021-02-25 20:13 | mikelmaron ♦34 | https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2021/02/25/100-million-edits-to-openstreetmap/ congrats Lamine! | |
| 70 | 2021-02-25 20:14 | KuoLLK ♦21 | Good！！ | |
| 71 | 2021-02-25 20:21 | yopaseopor ♦68 | Felicitats des de la Comunitat Catalana d'Openstreetmap. Congratulations!! | |
| 72 | 2021-02-25 20:26 | ikiya ♦27 | Congratulations!100,000,000 changesets ! | |
| 73 | 2021-02-25 20:27 | AKE Amazan ♦1 | Félicitations 🎉🎉 | |
| 74 | 2021-02-25 20:35 | EnumMapper ♦50 | Congrats🎉 | |
| 75 | 2021-02-25 20:40 | Buck Shockley ♦2 | Congratulations on getting the 100 millionth edit | |
| 76 | 2021-02-25 20:53 | hocu ♦75 | Congratulations! What a great milestone 🎉 | |
| 77 | 2021-02-25 20:57 | omniss ♦1 | 🎉Time to get a lotery ticket :-) | |
| 78 | 2021-02-25 20:57 | Eddie Burke ♦1 | We did it OSM, we saved mapping | |
| 79 | 2021-02-25 20:57 | zaizone ♦63 | Félicitations Lamine pour ce cent-millionième changeset ! Je crois que tu as gagné un petit quelque-chose ! --> http://weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/14294 | |
| 80 | 2021-02-25 21:06 | trial ♦870 | Bonjour, ça fait plaisir à voir. Et regardez la carte que beaucoup prétendent de référence : pas un chemin pour y aller. J'ai l'impression que ce changeset est l'occasion d'améliorer encore le coin ;-) : les tuiles évoluent bien. | |
| 81 | 2021-02-25 22:35 | Reino Baptista ♦93 | Félicitations Lamine,Also congratulations to all OpenStreetMap organisation! | |
| 82 | 2021-02-25 22:52 | S-zation ♦108 | Le cent millionième changeset 🎉 | |
| 83 | 2021-02-25 22:58 | SierraIm ♦6 | 🎊🎊🎊 | |
| 84 | 2021-02-25 23:13 | Farras ♦55 | Congratulations! 🎉 | |
| 85 | 2021-02-25 23:43 | Leo1590 ♦15 | Congrats!!!! | |
| 86 | 2021-02-25 23:45 | ortho_is_hot ♦252 | Congratulations 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 87 | 2021-02-25 23:57 | Kingtin ♦2 | Congrats | |
| 88 | 2021-02-26 00:47 | heimweh17 ♦1 | congratulations!!! | |
| 89 | 2021-02-26 00:55 | Adiatma IRM-RV ♦109 | Congratulations Lamine Ndiaye! 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉Happy to have you in 100 million changeset.Just in case you don't know (https://weeklyosm.eu/archives/14294) | |
| 90 | 2021-02-26 01:44 | ◪ Jarv ♦240 | 100 Million! WOOOO!!! | |
| 91 | 2021-02-26 02:19 | Nearby0051 ♦152 | Congrats! | |
| 92 | 2021-02-26 03:06 | Creeps_ ♦4 | Bien joué mon pote ! | |
| 93 | 2021-02-26 03:10 | Miftah IRM-ED ♦16 | congratulations! | |
| 94 | 2021-02-26 03:48 | DP24PH ♦418 | From DP24 in the Philippines, congrats to the 100M changeset! | |
| 95 | 2021-02-26 04:01 | booktiger ♦56 | Congratulations from the Chinese mapper！ | |
| 96 | 2021-02-26 05:06 | Magick93 ♦35 | Lucky Changeset number. GET! | |
| 97 | 2021-02-26 05:38 | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦514 | Congratulations ！You get the exact No.100000000 changeset！Good luck！ | |
| 98 | 2021-02-26 06:53 | AlexRiabtsev ♦46 | Congrats from Ukraine! | |
| 99 | 2021-02-26 07:24 | Lejun ♦482 | 🎉🎉🎉That’s our boy !🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 100 | 2021-02-26 08:06 | Nesim ♦50 | Congratulations | |
| 101 | 2021-02-26 08:16 | schwukas ♦52 | I'm glad someone so important to the community created this very special changeset! :) | |
| 102 | 2021-02-26 08:20 | ionut_radu ♦2 | Congrats from Cluj, Romania !!! Let's go for 1 billionth changeset! | |
| 103 | 2021-02-26 08:33 | GartenStuhl ♦103 | Congrats from Switzerland also :) | |
| 104 | 2021-02-26 09:57 | tux67 ♦1,940 | And congratulations from Germany .. great job - let's map the world together! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100000000 | |
| 105 | 2021-02-26 11:01 | WakefieldMapper ♦28 | Congrats from the UK! 🎉🎉 | |
| 106 | 2021-02-26 11:14 | JackNUMBER ♦10 | Congrats from France! 🙌 | |
| 107 | 2021-02-26 11:40 | Paul Berry ♦124 | Congratulations on making the 100 millionth changeset! | |
| 108 | 2021-02-26 11:47 | berndw ♦591 | !!!!!!!!!!! | |
| 109 | 2021-02-26 12:21 | stragu ♦25 | Bravo Lamine ! Merci pour tes contributions :) | |
| 110 | 2021-02-26 13:50 | Kuritsyn Roman ♦57 | 100 000 000!!!Congratulations!!! | |
| 111 | 2021-02-27 00:33 | salve100 ♦32 | 100M WOOOOO! | |
| 112 | 2021-02-27 10:11 | NM$L ♦83 | Congratulations from China! | |
| 113 | 2021-02-27 10:52 | edvac ♦221 | Félicitations, Lamine! Nianiane est maintenant une ville de renommée au niveau mondiale. J'espère un jour aller là pour visiter le village !! | |
| 114 | 2021-02-27 12:59 | kaartense ♦15 | 100 million!!! Congratulations!!! | |
| 115 | 2021-03-02 00:29 | Silva1989 ♦64 | Congrats! | |
| 116 | 2021-03-10 18:30 | AhmadHB ♦7 | Wow 100,000,000 Changeset | |
| 117 | 2021-03-15 15:23 | osm-mapping ♦24 | AWESOME CHANGESET | |
| 118 | 2021-03-24 20:57 | sdoorex ♦3 | Congrats on change 100M! | |
| 119 | 2021-04-02 03:27 | DawsZed ♦18 | Congrats on changeset 100M, with love from the United States!!! 🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 120 | 2021-04-05 21:40 | AlexMorpurgo ♦2 | Nice | |
| 121 | 2021-04-10 21:35 | rareanimal ♦1 | gg | |
| 122 | 2021-07-29 23:44 | Kento Kei ♦22 | Nice | |
| 123 | 2021-09-25 19:24 | Mason1007 ♦7 | ;) | |
| 124 | 2021-11-05 22:28 | conifermapper ♦58 | 100 MIL BOIIIIS!! | |
| 125 | 2022-07-24 05:38 | Nonichase ♦9 | Congratulations from China! | |
| 126 | 2023-01-17 17:44 | Enderbyte99 ♦14 | Your timing is epic!100 MILLION CHANGESETS | |
| 127 | 2023-03-29 10:03 | CactiStaccingCrane ♦60 | Nice | |
| 128 | 2023-04-13 18:54 | I-76 ♦38 | amazing it has more comments than #1 | |
| 129 | 2023-06-13 09:13 | Aphroditelita ♦18 | 100M lfg senegal! | |
| 130 | 2023-11-05 02:39 | Lamine Ndiaye ♦3 | thanks all | |
| 131 | 2024-02-23 14:42 | Road–Runner ♦221 | Awesome! | |
| 132 | 2025-02-16 18:49 | HugoC01 ♦33 | Congrats from France | |
| 133 | 2025-02-16 19:00 | HugoC01 ♦33 | 123 messages sur le 1 Millionième changesets.Un record ? | |
| 99812070 by Stereo @ 2021-02-23 09:44 | 1 | 2021-02-23 13:11 | Stereo | -e |
| 91464087 by tоmоlоbla @ 2020-09-24 19:42 | 1 | 2021-02-10 16:21 | Stereo | Salut Tom! Wees du nach, wat bei https://openstreetmap.org/way/851246284 falsch war, wat do richteg war, wat mam 22 ass, a wéi eng Strooss den 22 huet? Schéi Gréiss, Guillaume |
| 2 | 2021-02-10 18:55 | tоmоlоbla ♦38 | Salut. Nom Haus 22, sin d'CACLR Nummeren baal em een Haus ze wäit no Westen. Méi war et net :) | |
| 89867140 by spuseldange @ 2020-08-24 15:44 | 1 | 2021-02-03 15:12 | Stereo | Salut! Ech wousst net, dass di Referenzen do ëffentlech wire, wi cool! Sinn di Pläng, déi s du benotzt hues, online? |
| 97701799 by JerryHuss @ 2021-01-18 13:19 | 1 | 2021-01-18 13:28 | Stereo | Moien Jerry! Bravo fir däin éichten Edit, a wëlkomm bei OpenStreetMap. Cool, dass du esou séier de Wee vun der Feelermellung bis zur Verbesserung fonnt hues :) |
| 2 | 2021-01-18 13:34 | JerryHuss ♦1 | Merci, ech hu mäin Bëcht probeiert, fir et sou gutt wei meiglech anzezechnen :) Verbesserungen/Ännerungen kënne natirlech vun engem, deen dat schon mei oft gemach huet, gären gemaach ginn! | |
| 3 | 2021-01-18 13:40 | Stereo | Ech hu grad nach e puer Ännerunge gemaach, Schantjen als Wunngebitt geännert, Häiser gemoolt, asw. Adressen därfs du androen.Wees du, op een op https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/896575225 trëppelen a fueren däerf? A bis wou geet "Op der Heed" a wou fä... | |
| 93419801 by tоmоlоbla @ 2020-11-02 12:19 | 1 | 2020-11-02 16:05 | Stereo | I'm just really happy to see my "mapper's delight" layer being used in the wild :) |
| 93122209 by erolfr @ 2020-10-27 12:38 | 1 | 2020-10-27 12:56 | Stereo | Hallo (Moien?) erolfr,Wilkommen auf OpenStreetMap, und gratulation zu Deiner ersten Edition. Viel Spaß beim Mappen!Guillaume |
| 92659025 by oani_network @ 2020-10-18 14:38 | 1 | 2020-10-19 12:39 | Stereo | Hi again! You can tag the building as building=commercial; that way, it will show up like the others.Your editor automatically chose the French aerial imagery since you're close to the border; in the layer menu on the right of the screen, you can also choose the Geoportail.lu imagery layers... |
| 2 | 2020-10-21 17:51 | oani_network ♦1 | Thank you Stereo for you hint.Best regards from your OANI team,;-) | |
| 92658187 by oani_network @ 2020-10-18 14:10 | 1 | 2020-10-19 12:36 | Stereo | Hi! The "official" site is full of mistakes, and the guy wrote his name without a dash: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caspar_Mathias_Spoo and the advert at the bottom of https://www.industrie.lu/SpooCasparMathias.htmlWould you like to change it back?Happy mapping!Guillaume |
| 91629173 by user8723231 @ 2020-09-28 09:33 | 1 | 2020-09-29 11:29 | Stereo | Hello (Moien?) user8723231,Removing accurate data from OpenStreetMap is considered an act of vandalism. The area was mapped using public information. Please discontinue these deletions.Also, note that all the tracks inside the zone were marked as no access.Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 2 | 2020-09-30 13:39 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,396 | Some more deletions: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91768175 | |
| 78845825 by Juliane Roell @ 2019-12-25 12:23 | 1 | 2020-09-01 23:22 | Stereo | Ach, hier bist du auch? :) |
| 2 | 2020-09-03 11:07 | Juliane Roell ♦4 | Oh yeah! :) | |
| 89986862 by tоmоlоbla @ 2020-08-26 18:49 | 1 | 2020-08-30 18:35 | Stereo | Hi Tom, it's me again :) I'm wondering if you're sure that 7A rue Scheerbach exists on the ground? It doesn't exist on the Cadastre, and I can't find any reference to it online.Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 2 | 2020-08-31 14:53 | tоmоlоbla ♦38 | Hi Guillaume,There is a former golden housenumber 7a on the dark facade and several letter boxes right next to it in the indoor entry.ACT only has the info communes send them. The older the building, the smaller the chances are they've got it. | |
| 3 | 2020-08-31 15:02 | Stereo | Hey, thank you! I sometimes send out a couple of house numbers that are missing to Paul Mootz at the Cadastre. I'm working a lot on conflating the official and the OSM address databases right now, which is why you see me in your changeset comments :).When I find an address that exists but i... | |
| 4 | 2020-08-31 15:04 | Stereo | It's also not the Commune's fault sometimes: people invent house numbers themselves for many reasons, some of them not even bad. | |
| 5 | 2020-08-31 15:10 | tоmоlоbla ♦38 | Thanks for the tip, much better solution than opening a service ticket on the geoportail every time. I didn't imagine invented house numbers, besides the very common issue of unregistered people, was so common. I'll tag it accordingly :) | |
| 89976325 by tоmоlоbla @ 2020-08-26 13:52 | 1 | 2020-08-30 18:07 | Stereo | Hi Tom! Did you see the house numbers 12, 12A and 13 place Bleech on the ground? I wonder whether 12A and 13 exist at all.. |
| 2 | 2020-08-31 14:59 | tоmоlоbla ♦38 | I honestly didn't see the numbers themselves at the place. But several letterboxes at the building corner with, only names on them. I assumed the entries of the buildings at the backyard area. I didn't want to enter.Might be all of the boxes for number 12. But I rather adressed too much ... | |
| 89479676 by Lxfly @ 2020-08-16 18:02 | 1 | 2020-08-16 19:16 | Stereo | Moien Lxfly,Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and congratulations on your first edits. Don't hesitate to message me if you need help.Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 89305284 by bluelu @ 2020-08-12 12:39 | 1 | 2020-08-12 12:53 | Stereo | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and congratulations on your first edit. Happy mapping! |
| 89199930 by JAKeditus @ 2020-08-10 12:34 | 1 | 2020-08-11 15:51 | Stereo | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap!Il semble vraiment y avoir un problème ici: https://www.neofisc.com/fr-FR/Contact dit qu'ils sont au 40A, et les données ouvertes du Cadastre disent que c'est la maison de droite.J'ai marqué les adresses sur les maiso... |
| 2 | 2020-08-12 07:23 | JAKeditus ♦1 | Bonjour, Effectivement l'entreprise est bien au 40A et il s'agit de la maison de droite car celle de gauche est le numéro 40.C'est pour cette raison que nous essayons depuis un moment de faire les modifications sur Openstreetmap. Bien à vous,Julie-Anne | |
| 89187903 by monsite @ 2020-08-10 08:55 | 1 | 2020-08-10 12:28 | Stereo | Bonjour monsite!Attention, il y a un doublon avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195201101Pour les numéros en A, B, etc., la convention pour OSM au Luxembourg est d'utiliser la majuscule -> 40A, 42B, 212CBonne cartographie!Guillaume |
| 89196358 by Lyon-St-Clair @ 2020-08-10 11:26 | 1 | 2020-08-10 12:26 | Stereo | Oh non, ils ont fait ça? Les !@#$. |
| 88852587 by rene78 @ 2020-08-02 23:10 | 1 | 2020-08-03 10:19 | Stereo | Hah, wollte ich auch schon immer mappen. Viel Spaß im Urlaub :) |
| 2 | 2020-08-03 10:20 | rene78 ♦447 | Danke! Leider seit ein paar Tagen vorbei... :( | |
| 85620029 by snail044 @ 2020-05-22 15:26 | 1 | 2020-07-23 09:22 | Stereo | Hallo snail044! Die Adresse für https://openstreetmap.org/way/690875491 ist beim Katasteramt 7 Route de Diekirch Holzthum. Du hattest 70 Haaptstrooss Hoscheid-Dickt eingetragen. Hat sich das vor Ort geändert?Viel Spaß beim Mappen! |
| 2 | 2020-07-23 10:42 | snail044 ♦4 | Hallo Stereo,die Eintragungen entsprechen dem optischen Eindruck vor Ort - Schilder mit Strassennamen gibt es dort im Bereich nicht. Die Häuser gegenüber gehören mit 70er Nummern jedenfalls zur Haaptstrooss. Wenns im Kataster so steht, wird das wohl gültig sein. Wäre eine ... | |
| 88349740 by dFeldmaus @ 2020-07-22 12:38 | 1 | 2020-07-22 13:35 | Stereo | Moien d'Feldmaus. Wëlkomm op OpenStreetMap, a vill Spaas beim Mappen! |
| 87566782 by KosAdd @ 2020-07-05 21:18 | 1 | 2020-07-09 11:15 | Stereo | What an interesting article, thank you! |
| 87715260 by sandwitche @ 2020-07-08 14:06 | 1 | 2020-07-08 14:13 | Stereo | Cheers! Happy mapping! |
| 87662581 by sandwitche @ 2020-07-07 15:18 | 1 | 2020-07-08 07:01 | Stereo | Hi sandwitche,I've cycled there. It was legal. It was mildly unpleasant, but I knew what I was doing. The information in OpenStreetMap should be objectively verifiable on the ground, and this is subjective.It's up to the cyclist and the routing engines to decide if they want to go ... |
| 2 | 2020-07-08 10:58 | sandwitche ♦6 | Hi, yes sure, I'm not saying it's illegal but I also know from experience that this is not a pleasant road to ride on, so I wouldn't recommend it to non-road/sports cyclists. | |
| 3 | 2020-07-08 11:48 | sandwitche ♦6 | personnaly i would leave it on no for bicycles, because on the wiki (here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access ) on the "no" value they state "No access for the general public.", and it is not suited for ther general public in my opinion. | |
| 4 | 2020-07-08 13:06 | Stereo | Hah, yeah, I wouldn't recommend it either! It really is a missing link in the cycle network, too. I'm glad there will be a pop-up cycleway between Mensdorf and Übersyren this summer.That wiki page says: Access values describe legal permissions/restrictions and should follow ground... | |
| 5 | 2020-07-08 14:03 | sandwitche ♦6 | yeah ok then it should be "yes", but there are stil better alternatives, thanks, at least i learned something | |
| 87659441 by wilda69 @ 2020-07-07 13:57 | 1 | 2020-07-07 15:48 | Stereo | Yeeeeah but then it's the router that should be fixed. If you tag them as highway=pedestrian at least they don't show up :). |
| 87661804 by Nadège Chesnay @ 2020-07-07 14:57 | 1 | 2020-07-07 15:46 | Stereo | Bonjour Nadège,Le point semble avoir été placé du côté impair de la route - est-ce que vous êtes certaine que c'est correct?Merci et bonne cartographie :)Guillaume |
| 2 | 2020-07-09 06:01 | Nadège Chesnay ♦2 | Bonjour,Oui je trouve cela bizarre aussi, mais en regardant sur Google Street View, le bâtiment est un centre médical ce qui correspond à l'activité de ma cliente. Elle m'a dit que le point était juste sur Google... Je l'ai informée de la m... | |
| 87655613 by Stereo @ 2020-07-07 12:34 | 1 | 2020-07-07 12:47 | Stereo | Addresses that had no *match, even |
| 86951677 by A67-A67 @ 2020-06-22 02:55 | 1 | 2020-06-22 08:47 | Stereo | Oops, sorry if I accidentally broke that! |
| 2 | 2020-06-23 13:33 | A67-A67 ♦932 | No problem. Everything is correct now. | |
| 86446431 by monsite @ 2020-06-10 07:39 | 1 | 2020-06-15 10:25 | Stereo | Bonjour monsite,Attention, vous aviez accidentellement enlevé le tag 'highway' de la rue des Trévires. Le bureau de l'ostéopathe que vous avez rajouté a accidentellement été placé deux fois.Merci aussi de mettre des commentaires... |
| 86310557 by de vries @ 2020-06-07 14:55 | 1 | 2020-06-07 15:45 | Stereo | Nice quick changeset :) |
| 85466925 by Stereo @ 2020-05-19 23:23 | 1 | 2020-05-20 11:11 | ma-rt-in ♦1,752 | Hello,is it really necessary to enter data, as it is not possible to verify anything on site? |
| 2 | 2020-05-30 21:52 | Stereo | Hello,I find it interesting, and have been able to verify that information without leaving confinement, so yes :)Happy mapping,Guillaume | |
| 3 | 2020-05-31 09:56 | ma-rt-in ♦1,752 | I think it's more like you were copying from old maps. Because for an old Roman bridge on the border between Germany and Luxembourg there are no longer any clues on the spot and would therefore not be verifiable on site. | |
| 4 | 2020-06-02 15:45 | Stereo | "Rue des Romains" on one side which is a pretty good clue, plus old books, yeah. | |
| 85544649 by EMAB567 @ 2020-05-21 09:32 | 1 | 2020-05-21 09:55 | dmlu ♦164 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap,I noticed that you added a cabin that you named "Test".Is this cabin real? If not, please don't upload fictional changes.Greetings,dmlu |
| 2 | 2020-05-21 09:59 | Stereo | Hello, and welcome to OSM! You've created a test, but it's visible to everyone. I've removed it.Happy mapping!Guillaume | |
| 85281071 by Ned_Stark @ 2020-05-15 20:43 | 1 | 2020-05-15 22:53 | Stereo | Thank you and your team for adding all these small details! |
| 2 | 2020-05-18 17:16 | Ned_Stark ♦7 | Thank you, I appreciate your recognition of our work. I will pass on your kind words to the team. | |
| 83704128 by Skroma @ 2020-04-17 11:31 | 1 | 2020-05-04 18:19 | Stereo | Really nice level of detail. Happy mapping! |
| 76853749 by GeWaLu @ 2019-11-09 20:30 | 1 | 2020-04-24 13:56 | Stereo | Hi GeWaLu! I can't find any reference to '9 rue de la Station' for the train station in Dommeldange, and the other side of the street has uneven numbers too. Did you see a house number on the building? Happy mapping! Guillaume |
| 2 | 2020-04-24 17:45 | GeWaLu ♦3 | If I remember well, I found this 9 either on the right side of the building or in the window of the integrated streetwork office. Thanks for the hint - you are right, this numbering is strange and may be a mistake - I'll re-check in a few days - the next time I'll pass at the station. | |
| 3 | 2020-04-25 15:05 | GeWaLu ♦3 | I can confirm the 9. It is twice present: On the right door frame as normal blue housenumber sign and as location info on the postbox no54 on the left side of the building - with street name. | |
| 4 | 2020-04-27 15:50 | Stereo | Hah! Crazy. I've re-added it to the building then. Thank you very much. | |
| 84118262 by Nakaner @ 2020-04-25 18:59 | 1 | 2020-04-26 02:08 | Stereo | Hah, freut mich, dass unsere Bilder auch auf der anderen Seite helfen :) |
| 83772232 by PalGab05 @ 2020-04-19 12:59 | 1 | 2020-04-19 13:05 | Stereo | Bonjour (Moien?), bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap et félicitations pour votre premier changement! |
| 83049312 by dmlu @ 2020-04-03 18:15 | 1 | 2020-04-03 18:17 | Stereo | Great work!! |
| 82367677 by Stereo @ 2020-03-19 01:14 | 1 | 2020-03-19 01:27 | Stereo | Dragash and Decan boundaries from KCA. Sorry for the huge changeset and the bad changeset comment. |
| 82226845 by Polchen @ 2020-03-15 20:11 | 1 | 2020-03-16 10:24 | Stereo | Moien! Bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap, et félicitations pour ton premier edit.On trouve les deux noms, viaduc de Hamm et viaduc de Neudorf. Un exemple de Neudorf: https://cour-des-comptes.public.lu/dam-assets/fr/rapports/rapports-speciaux/2004/fonds-des-routes.pdfQu'est-ce que tu pe... |
| 2 | 2020-03-17 13:23 | Polchen ♦1 | Merci :-) Le viaduc de Neudorf se trouve de l'autre côté du tunnel du Cents. Il est composé de deux ponts (au dessus de la N1 et de la N1C - rue de Neudorf).La page du Pont Victor Bodson (https://travaux.public.lu/fr/projets/projets-ponts-viaducs/pont-victor-bodson.html) c... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-17 16:31 | Stereo | Aha! J'ai appris quelque chose, merci beaucoup. C'est rajouté ici du coup: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683461815Bienvenue encore une fois, et bonne cartographie! | |
| 4 | 2020-03-17 16:34 | Stereo | Et le viaduc Nord: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683461810 | |
| 81881459 by PolarKuma @ 2020-03-06 18:53 | 1 | 2020-03-13 00:34 | Stereo | 'Gondeleng' semble utilisé aussi: https://www.waldbredimus.lu/fr/Documents/Nouvellen%2043%20-%20Dezember%202012.pdfJe mets 'Gondeleng' en alt_name:lb. |
| 82133039 by dmlu @ 2020-03-12 23:15 | 1 | 2020-03-13 00:22 | Stereo | Ah, virdru war et am CACLR "Imp. Av. Lucien Salentiny". Wees net, wat si sech do geduecht haten :) |
| 2 | 2020-03-13 00:26 | dmlu ♦164 | Hunn ech mer geduecht! Et ass scho praktesch, anstänneg changeset comments ze hunn :) | |
| 81376646 by Lyon-St-Clair @ 2020-02-23 21:23 | 1 | 2020-02-25 13:19 | Stereo | Salut Lyon-St-Clair,Le CR 320D est repris dans https://travaux.public.lu/dam-assets/fr/reseau-routier/itineraires-reseau-routier/reseau-routier-itineraires.pdf et la convention dans la communauté OSM LU est donc de l'avoir en secondaire. Le tag tertiaire est plutôt pour les rou... |
| 2 | 2020-02-25 13:47 | Lyon-St-Clair ♦107 | Salut,Oula, j'avais juré avoir bien fait gaffe à ce genre de conventions. Je te laisse rectifier le tir et éventuellement corriger d'autres trucs comme le cas de la N56 et de la B4. J'ai touché quasi exclusivement à des routes transfrontali&egrav... | |
| 70736314 by 5Sabani @ 2019-05-29 14:43 | 1 | 2019-12-27 14:23 | Stereo | Hello! I see you've changed the name of your street a few times. "Përroi Dardan" is the name that Agjencia Kadastrale e Kosovës tells us this name has. Is there another street name on the sign at the entrance? Could you please take a picture so we can tell them to fix their ... |
| 78783677 by LeutrimG @ 2019-12-23 17:26 | 1 | 2019-12-27 14:02 | Stereo | Hello! So the name of the big new road is "Met Podjeva" too? Is the road name "Fazli Fetahu" that was between "Tirona" and "Vëllezërit Frashëri" now completely gone? |
| 2 | 2019-12-27 14:46 | LeutrimG ♦1 | Yes they are "gone". Because it was build a main road ,"Met Podjeva" which replaced those minor roads. | |
| 74343661 by SHARCRASH @ 2019-09-11 09:28 | 1 | 2019-12-18 10:11 | Stereo | Is way 183456834 open again? |
| 2 | 2019-12-18 10:32 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | I didn't pass there recently. Should be open though according the dates that were on the fence. | |
| 3 | 2019-12-18 10:43 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | updated | |
| 78542778 by XY22 @ 2019-12-17 19:25 | 1 | 2019-12-18 10:08 | Stereo | Die zwei Spuren sind aber nicht getrennt - wäre oneway:psv=no auf der Hauptspur besser? |
| 2 | 2019-12-18 20:10 | XY22 ♦32 | Bin ganz deiner Meinung. Die Busspur ist nur durch eine weiße Linie von den den 2 Hauptspuren getrennt. Daher wäre hier eine 3-spurige Straße besser. Ich wollte gestern nur schnell motor_vehicle=designated entfernen, was hier auf jeden Fall falsch ist. | |
| 77727798 by MaryGeo @ 2019-11-29 12:27 | 1 | 2019-11-29 15:12 | Stereo | Hi MaryGeo,Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for helping out in Albania.When you draw buildings, there can be a bit of 'lean' if the pictures were taken at an angle. The roof of the building ends up being a few metres away from the base of the building. When that happens, aft... |
| 2 | 2019-11-29 17:18 | MaryGeo ♦1 | Hi Guillaume,thanks a lot, I will follow your suggest ;-)Best regards Mariateresa | |
| 77343253 by ma-rt-in @ 2019-11-20 20:19 | 1 | 2019-11-21 08:26 | Stereo | Hallo Martin! `access=yes` könnte man eigentlich komplett rauslassen, oder? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Qa.poole.ch_(QA_tool)#AEYCH |
| 76923477 by Lyon-St-Clair @ 2019-11-11 17:46 | 1 | 2019-11-15 02:15 | Stereo | Hello! Attention, tu as du coup cassé les 34 relations de bus, la relation N4 et la relation autopédestre qui passaient par là. Tu veux essayer de les réparer ou tu veux un coup de main? |
| 2 | 2019-11-15 06:02 | Lyon-St-Clair ♦107 | Et bien je vois pas pourquoi c'est encore cassé... | |
| 73812666 by Stereo @ 2019-08-27 19:44 | 1 | 2019-10-26 14:59 | aceman444 ♦2,572 | Hi, it should be diplomatic=consulate. Other tags of your's seem to be OK. |
| 2 | 2019-11-04 23:05 | Stereo | Hi aceman444,So office=diplomatic + diplomatic=consulate + consulate=honorary_consulate ? | |
| 3 | 2019-11-04 23:12 | aceman444 ♦2,572 | Yes, consulate=honorary_consul , but only where it is honorary consulate. There are other types of consulates too.Seehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Ddiplomatic for the combinations. | |
| 76529972 by Stereo @ 2019-11-02 15:02 | 1 | 2019-11-02 20:24 | borishag ♦150 | ICI PARIS XL; you have deleted the adress tags, Why?B.HagemanEditor AS Watson strores |
| 2 | 2019-11-03 01:01 | Stereo | Hello Boris, the addresses are (or soon will be) on the surrounding ways, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42311005 | |
| 3 | 2019-11-05 08:47 | borishag ♦150 | All 1760 AS Watson stores in OSM in the Benelux and France have adress tags in nodes. Please restore nodes 4709065892 and 4711241595.b.hageman@nl.aswatson.com | |
| 4 | 2019-11-05 21:15 | dmlu ♦164 | Hi,Boris: Doesn't the AS Watson stores "backend" include/process inherited addresses from the surrounding building outline?Duplicating address information increases the maintenance costs / effort required to import all the addresses from open data and keep the addresses in OSM... | |
| 76533123 by Stereo @ 2019-11-02 17:11 | 1 | 2019-11-03 00:58 | Stereo | Accidentally did changes in two regions; sorry. |
| 72985862 by Maarten Deen @ 2019-08-04 09:47 | 1 | 2019-10-09 06:37 | Stereo | Hi Maarten! I'm not sure what happened in this changeset, but it looks like you dropped a whole part from line 125. |
| 2 | 2019-10-09 06:48 | Maarten Deen ♦73 | That has to be unintentional. But a with a quick check I don't see where? Both relations 1166451 and 7119490 still run from the Betriebshof to Oberanven? | |
| 3 | 2019-10-14 10:38 | Stereo | It goes through Oberanven, then to Rameldange, then back to Oberanven for the driver's coffee break: https://www.mobiliteit.lu/wp-content/uploads/horaires/rgtr/125.pdf | |
| 4 | 2019-10-15 05:39 | Maarten Deen ♦73 | Yes I see. It's fixed now. | |
| 74383168 by A67-A67 @ 2019-09-12 08:43 | 1 | 2019-09-29 22:46 | Stereo | Wow, impressing amount of bus fixes. Massive thanks. |
| 73642838 by RudolpheDeer @ 2019-08-22 21:42 | 1 | 2019-08-27 15:34 | Stereo | Hello,Pease don't remove documented tags such as `diplomatic:receiving_country` that others might use.Thank you and happy mappingGuillaume |
| 33629833 by jpennycook @ 2015-08-27 20:12 | 1 | 2019-08-14 11:55 | Stereo | I love the tricycle=no on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30471352 |
| 70729281 by Noam (Moovit) @ 2019-05-29 11:06 | 1 | 2019-06-05 11:35 | Stereo | Hi Noam! As far as I can tell from walking there this is not a path but a boundary, so I'll be re-tagging it as `boundary=administrative`. |
| 2 | 2019-06-05 11:36 | Stereo | Happy mapping :) | |
| 3 | 2019-06-05 16:03 | Noam (Moovit) ♦1 | Awesome, I was pretty sure there wasn't stairs there, just didn't want to delete before I was certain. Thanks! | |
| 70352178 by AVL_FLI_KA @ 2019-05-17 11:11 | 1 | 2019-05-17 11:38 | Stereo | :-D |
| 70274316 by AVL_FLI_KA @ 2019-05-15 12:47 | 1 | 2019-05-17 10:49 | Stereo | Moien! Därfe de Bus/Taxi dann elo awer tatsächlech vun der Bréck lénks an d'Marie-Thérèse ofbéien? |
| 2 | 2019-05-17 10:56 | AVL_FLI_KA ♦5 | MoienEch hun et just geännert dass mer eng Kaart hun fir den Routing fir Marathon. Ech setzen et nees zereck soubaal den Routing funktionéiert. :) | |
| 3 | 2019-05-17 11:12 | AVL_FLI_KA ♦5 | ass nees geännert. | |
| 70121217 by JIDB @ 2019-05-10 18:54 | 1 | 2019-05-10 23:20 | Stereo | Hi! We already have the footbath tags on https://openstreetmap.org/way/433292572 but I'm not sure which of the two tagging schemes is "better". |
| 2 | 2019-05-11 07:19 | JIDB ♦37 | I saw that. The main scheme is actually amenity=kneipp_water_cure but it is for the whole site (not only the par with water, for for exemple the benches around the water too). kneipp_water_cure=foot is a supplementary scheme for detail mapping and shows the parts with water. That is why, I added a t... | |
| 3 | 2019-05-11 21:14 | Stereo | Perfect then :). Happy mapping! | |
| 69401794 by ShendritGashi @ 2019-04-20 12:42 | 1 | 2019-04-23 12:30 | Stereo | Hello Shendrit!Thank you, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. The cadastre says that the name of the street is Adem Sharbani. Is the street sign different? Does everyone in Sharban call it Nistret Jusufi?Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 65969550 by Stereo @ 2019-01-02 20:04 | 1 | 2019-04-17 10:46 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | landuse=civic_admin is still just a drafted proposed feature. We should stick to the adopted consensuses . |
| 2 | 2019-04-17 13:33 | Stereo | We should, but there's currently no other way of describing this, no? What do you think we should use instead?Drafted proposals don't mean much - wayside crosses or smoking are proposals that happen to be widely adopted. | |
| 3 | 2019-04-17 14:35 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | It does mean something. It helps community to decide on how to use certain elements. :) For Wayside crosses, the tag exists since 2009, there are 104573 elements, hence adopted "de facto". For Smoking_area, the tag is fairly new, only 969+207 elements, not really widely adopted (only 1... | |
| 4 | 2019-04-17 14:38 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Even in our Quartier Européen, there are mixed in hotels, concert hall, swimming pool.... | |
| 69221831 by Ferati Lendrit @ 2019-04-15 06:06 | 1 | 2019-04-16 17:51 | Stereo | Super :) |
| 69252171 by Pedja @ 2019-04-15 23:50 | 1 | 2019-04-16 00:59 | Stereo | Hi Pedja. Good idea. There's a few more without the name in cyrillic in Gračanica: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/I0uHave you ever visited? |
| 2 | 2019-04-16 01:37 | Pedja ♦30 | It will all be done but it takes time. | |
| 69213384 by Ferati11 @ 2019-04-14 20:26 | 1 | 2019-04-14 22:31 | Stereo | Hallo Ferati, willkommen auf OpenStreetMap! Allgemein ist der Community-Konsens, dass wir "Rruga XYZ" vermeiden und nur "XYZ" benutzen - ausser es ist die Richtung, wie in "Rruga e Pejes".Kommst du mit uns chatten? Auf https://t.me/osmkosovo sind die andere Mapper.\... |
| 68768551 by Lyon-St-Clair @ 2019-04-01 20:07 | 1 | 2019-04-01 21:43 | Stereo | T'es un peu loin de Saint-Nazaire là je crois :D |
| 2 | 2019-04-01 21:44 | Lyon-St-Clair ♦107 | Je sais, j'ai oublié de toucher à ce p**** de commentaire de diff automatique :') | |
| 68738083 by bjankuloski @ 2019-04-01 00:05 | 1 | 2019-04-01 15:50 | Stereo | Hello! I'm curious, would the Macedonian and Serbian name always be the same? Happy mapping, Guillaume |
| 2 | 2019-04-01 21:26 | bjankuloski ♦4 | Hello Guillaume. For areas on the Balkans, they are usually similar, but often not the same. Even if names are the same, serbian tradition dictates that the ending be a bit different than Macedonian (e.g. -ац vs -ец) and vice versa. Some can be very different), but overall there are lots of simi... | |
| 68332247 by Pedja @ 2019-03-20 11:36 | 1 | 2019-03-20 19:12 | Stereo | Hi Pedja, thank you for fixing this. Please get in touch with us at the Data Working Group if you need help. |
| 2 | 2019-03-21 02:12 | Pedja ♦30 | No problem. But it is tiring to police data and check for vandalisation.I hope OSM will do something to stop vandals. | |
| 68132090 by mjlux @ 2019-03-14 10:46 | 1 | 2019-03-14 10:50 | Stereo | :) |
| 67903642 by Ilir Berisha @ 2019-03-07 23:10 | 1 | 2019-03-08 10:23 | Stereo | Welcome to OpenStreetMap Ilir, happy mapping :) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67903642 |
| 67851890 by Corban8 @ 2019-03-06 17:06 | 1 | 2019-03-06 19:53 | Stereo | Hi Corban!https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448670155 shouldn't there actually be two ways and a no u turn restriction there? |
| 2 | 2019-03-06 21:14 | Corban8 ♦21 | Hi StereoThat might be the case. At that particular junction I was just fixing a “crossing highway” error. I connected the footway near the top of that y junction to the tertiary road. https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=448670155#map=19/42.63487/21.08395 | |
| 65964856 by Stereo @ 2019-01-02 17:06 | 1 | 2019-01-24 12:33 | mjlux ♦7 | Moien, den Tramsarrêt "Philharmonie-MUDAM" ass den Ament den eenzegen, deem säin Numm am Standard Layer net ugewise gëtt. Ech mengen, dat kënnt dovunner, dass du hei "station:railway" ewechgeholl hues. Ech weess elo net, wat richteg ass, mä 't sollt... |
| 2 | 2019-02-27 11:59 | Stereo | Moien! Merci fir däi Message a pardon fir di spéit Äntwert. Jo, wahrscheinlech well railway=station net méi drop ass. Op der anerer Säit ass dat wirklech nëmme fir eng Gare geduecht. Sou vill wéi ech vum Tram begeechtert sinn, soll all Halt wirklech bei zoom ... | |
| 3 | 2019-02-27 13:16 | mjlux ♦7 | Merci fir deng Äntwert! Fir mech ass dat heiten een "tram stop" an ech géif et esou taggen wéi et op https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trams#Tram_stops steet. Mä den User Lyon-St-Clair huet eise ganzen Tram op "light rail" mat iwwerall "railway=stat... | |
| 67475288 by fire1tex @ 2019-02-22 18:08 | 1 | 2019-02-23 08:59 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,396 | Hi fire1tex, welcome to OSM.May I know the reason, behind deleting several mapped ways, which are still visible the used sattelite imagery? Thanks.More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67475288 |
| 2 | 2019-02-23 17:26 | fire1tex ♦1 | Hello, pitscheplatsch I am happy to explain these changes. First, about me, I am the Installation GIS manager for Fort Hood. I am a Department of the Army civilian and work on Fort Hood. The reason for the removal of these center lines are due to the fact that they are "tank trails" for... | |
| 3 | 2019-02-24 10:37 | Stereo | Hi Russ,This does happen every once in a while, for example for paths in national parks that shouldn't be used by hikers. Deleting, however, isn't the best way to do it, and can even be considered vandalism: OSM maps the reality on the ground, whatever that is.Here, the reality is ... | |
| 4 | 2019-02-24 18:11 | fire1tex ♦1 | Guilluame,Understood, I'm not sure that un-deleting and re-tagging them as no access is the best way to go here, these trails were poorly drawn and attributed in the first place, wrong names and types, odd connections and so forth. Many of the trails are actually not authorized by our environ... | |
| 5 | 2019-02-24 20:03 | phidauex ♦194 | Unsolicited recommendation: the "abandoned" prefix to the highway tag can be helpful for cases like this, since it will prevent the line from being rendered, but will still show up in the editor so that someone doesn't come along and just add it again.A tag combo like, "aband... | |
| 66910426 by SHARCRASH @ 2019-02-04 17:35 | 1 | 2019-02-05 17:59 | Stereo | One note less! Cheers :) |
| 2 | 2019-02-05 21:18 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Spotted a few others which will be resolved. | |
| 66512638 by user_1025148 @ 2019-01-21 17:42 Active block | 1 | 2019-01-23 00:12 | Stereo | Please try to leave good changeset comments:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 66485487 by marcknj @ 2019-01-20 21:12 | 1 | 2019-01-20 21:13 | marcknj ♦35 | https://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2019/01/15/albanian-becomes-second-official-language-macedonia/ |
| 2 | 2019-01-20 21:24 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2019-01-20 21:25 | marcknj ♦35 | https://de.euronews.com/2019/01/15/albanisch-wird-zweite-amtssprache-in-mazedonien Better? | |
| 4 | 2019-01-20 21:28 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 5 | 2019-01-20 22:26 | marcknj ♦35 | https://portalb.mk/584138-ligji-i-gjuheve-dhe-marreveshja-e-prespes-ne-gazeten-zyrtare-xhaferi-sqaroi-se-pse-i-fuqizoi-sot-video/ Look down there, you can also find it at the official gazette of Macedonia that the language at least 20% of the population speak (Albanian!) is the 2nd official language... | |
| 6 | 2019-01-20 22:31 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 7 | 2019-01-20 22:48 | marcknj ♦35 | It gets obvious that you did not read what I sent to you. Closing your eyes from the new reality is not very clever ;) | |
| 8 | 2019-01-20 22:53 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 9 | 2019-01-20 22:55 | marcknj ♦35 | It's very simple, because Greek or Macedonian are not official languages in Albania, however Albanian is an official language together with Macedonian | |
| 10 | 2019-01-20 22:57 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 11 | 2019-01-20 22:59 | ElmedinRKS ♦1 | Albanian is since a few of days official (2nd) language | |
| 12 | 2019-01-20 22:59 | marcknj ♦35 | Theres no provocation. Please read the pictures from portalb I sent to you, and you'll understand what I mean | |
| 13 | 2019-01-20 23:01 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 14 | 2019-01-20 23:01 | ElmedinRKS ♦1 | http://ba.n1info.com/English/NEWS/a309657/Albanian-becomes-second-language-in-Macedonia-Tsipras-faces-no-confidence-vote.htmlThe Macedonian Parliament has introduced the Albanian language as the second official language | |
| 15 | 2019-01-20 23:05 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 16 | 2019-01-20 23:06 | Stereo | Hello from the OpenStreetMap Foundation's Data Working Group. This has been reported to us.First of all, thank both of you for not changing the name until this is cleared up. The name situation here is complicated enough as it is.Vigilante, do you have any source for your claim? It is m... | |
| 17 | 2019-01-20 23:08 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 18 | 2019-01-20 23:11 | ElmedinRKS ♦1 | The link is from 11st January. Albanian is since 15th January second language | |
| 19 | 2019-01-20 23:12 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 20 | 2019-01-20 23:14 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 21 | 2019-01-20 23:15 | ElmedinRKS ♦1 | But that is irrelevant. In fact, Macedonia has passed legislation to introduce albanian language as 2nd language | |
| 22 | 2019-01-20 23:17 | ElmedinRKS ♦1 | That is true, that would be a different. In the past Albanian was a official regional language like Serbian. But since a week it isnt anymore | |
| 23 | 2019-01-20 23:18 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 24 | 2019-01-20 23:18 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 25 | 2019-01-20 23:20 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 26 | 2019-01-20 23:21 | marcknj ♦35 | Article 1:(1): in the whole territory of Macedonia and for foreign relations the official language is macedonian and its Cyrillic alphabet (2): the other language which at least speak 20% of the population is also an official language (3): in every public institution, organization .... Macedon... | |
| 27 | 2019-01-20 23:22 | ElmedinRKS ♦1 | Lovely Vigilante, there are many actual news which reported that both Macedonian and Albanian are now full officiall languages of the Republic. | |
| 28 | 2019-01-20 23:26 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 29 | 2019-01-20 23:27 | ElmedinRKS ♦1 | I do not have to justify myself to you. But no, I am not! Yes, I have 0 edits, because in the past I was registered on OSM. I followed the discussion and have to tell you that you are wrong. | |
| 30 | 2019-01-20 23:27 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 31 | 2019-01-20 23:27 | marcknj ♦35 | Why don't you read article 1-2 together? | |
| 32 | 2019-01-20 23:28 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 33 | 2019-01-20 23:30 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 34 | 2019-01-20 23:31 | ElmedinRKS ♦1 | You don’t have to tell me where I have to stay on OSM. If someone is thinking wrongly I have to correct him. | |
| 35 | 2019-01-20 23:31 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 36 | 2019-01-20 23:31 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 37 | 2019-01-20 23:35 | ElmedinRKS ♦1 | https://www.rferl.org/a/macedonia-s-albanian-language-bill-becomes-law/29711502.htmlNext source! You have to accept it. That is democracy. Xhaferi had the permission to sign off. Are you aware, that Macedonia passed legislation to change his name? Since 11nd January it’s called North-Maced... | |
| 38 | 2019-01-20 23:37 | ElmedinRKS ♦1 | To sum up, Maqedonia is quite correctly | |
| 39 | 2019-01-21 10:11 | user_1025148 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 40 | 2019-01-22 02:33 | Stereo | Please try to find a peaceful solution on the name of the country. If Macedonia now has two official languages, it makes sense that some would want to see this reflected in the country name. In Luxembourg on the other hand, languages are a lot less politically loaded, and we just picked one because ... | |
| 66321678 by Allison P @ 2019-01-15 04:48 | 1 | 2019-01-15 17:01 | Stereo | Hi from the Data Working Group.Thank you for looking into these. The user has made more edits that might need reverting.They have, in any case, been blocked for 96 hours now. |
| 2 | 2019-01-15 17:41 | Allison P ♦1,136 | I made a couple mistakes in my reversion (that have been fixed) and I got a message from OSM_Vandalism_Bot about these changes. What's weird is that the bot was just created and it doesn't seem to act like a bot, but like a person pretending to be one. | |
| 66336519 by ᴉoqʞɹɐԀ @ 2019-01-15 16:27 | 1 | 2019-01-15 17:00 | Stereo | Hi from the Data Working Group.Thank you for having a look at these edits and reverting them.Are you using some kind of script for this? |
| 2 | 2019-01-15 17:34 | Allison P ♦1,136 | I'm also curious about this bot. I received a message from it with such broken English I thought it was a vandal continuing to antagonize. | |
| 3 | 2019-01-15 17:58 | ᴉoqʞɹɐԀ ♦1 | Not a bot just a name. I find the problems in my area thats all. | |
| 66078739 by MelchersKim @ 2019-01-06 19:42 | 1 | 2019-01-14 11:48 | Stereo | Hi Kim! You've requested a review of this changeset, and you'll be happy to read that everything looks good. The only thing I would improve is your changeset comments, so that other users know what you did. Instead of "change", maybe "added steps" or "Added steps t... |
| 66229408 by Lyon-St-Clair @ 2019-01-11 15:06 | 1 | 2019-01-11 16:44 | Stereo | Nickel :) |
| 66222686 by Lyon-St-Clair @ 2019-01-11 11:01 | 1 | 2019-01-11 15:02 | Stereo | Bonjour Lyon-St-Clair ! On met d'habitude le quai dans le tag 'ref', comme ça les différents logiciels peuvent facilement grouper les stations par nom. Bonne cartographie :) |
| 2 | 2019-01-11 15:05 | Lyon-St-Clair ♦107 | Bien vu ! Le pire c'est que j'ai remplis le "ref"... Allez, je corrige de suite. | |
| 65266321 by Edward Cardew @ 2018-12-07 12:08 | 1 | 2018-12-07 17:15 | Stereo | That was quick! Can bikes cross it like they used to? |
| 65024055 by Claudius Henrichs @ 2018-11-29 20:34 | 1 | 2018-11-30 08:54 | Stereo | ;) |
| 57514143 by s-tikhomirov @ 2018-03-25 17:58 | 1 | 2018-11-15 15:13 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Please, be careful how you set the access on a way: Because of the private access on this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572872916/ it is not possible anymore to go from here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3684132252 to this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3725974274 It breaks the ... |
| 2 | 2018-11-15 15:16 | s-tikhomirov ♦5 | Yes, that used to be the case (public access to a road restricted due to construction works here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572872915). Will check if this is still the case. | |
| 3 | 2018-11-15 15:23 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | I just saw now what they did: they created a line of block barrier to divide the way you've put in private, one side is not accessible, the other on is fine and the routing i've shown you is still accessible. Should i do it or do you see it on the 2017 im. sat.? | |
| 4 | 2018-11-15 15:34 | s-tikhomirov ♦5 | I understand what you're talking about, would be nice if you do it (I'm not sure how to divide a way properly in this case). | |
| 5 | 2018-11-19 12:32 | Stereo | Is the new 2018 imagery helpful here? | |
| 6 | 2018-11-19 14:05 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Yeah it helps mostly... but i noticed something weird between the 2017 and 2018 photos: haven't the 2018 photos been copied also over the 2017 reference? The 2018 and 2017 photos are exactly the same and if i recall correctly, the barriers i've been talking about here were not on the 2017 ... | |
| 7 | 2018-11-19 14:08 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | What i'm talking about is the case in JOSM editor, not in the iD editor. | |
| 8 | 2018-11-19 15:21 | Stereo | It depends on your JOSM config, but in the imagery menu, at the very bottom, "geoportail.lu ortho latest" should have the 2018 and "geoportail.lu ortho all layers" should have an expanding menu showing them all. The 2017 images could still be in your cache maybe? | |
| 9 | 2018-11-19 19:54 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | When i said that both are the same and 2018 replaced the 2017, I meant that both 2017 and 2018 have 2018's tiles. So it's weird to still have the 2017 cache. Anyway, your suggestion put me on the right solution, i reloaded the 2017 imagery from Geoportail's list and now it's rig... | |
| 64419990 by Garmin-User @ 2018-11-12 20:13 | 1 | 2018-11-12 22:55 | Stereo | Hi Garmin-User,Should those not be type=boundary instead?There is a local OSM community chat on Telegram at t.me/osmkosovo if you want to join us.Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 2 | 2018-11-13 06:54 | Garmin-User ♦335 | Hi,type=boundary needs futher tagging like boundary=administrative with admin_level. Normal areas are plain multipolygons, type=multipolygon with place=region is often used.Best regards | |
| 64228045 by foxandpotatoes @ 2018-11-06 12:07 | 1 | 2018-11-06 12:17 | Stereo | Le rond-point à côté et la N88 au bout aussi? |
| 2 | 2018-11-07 09:18 | foxandpotatoes ♦18 | Oui, c'est exact ! La modification a été faite dans le cadre de la formation donnée ce 6 novembre à l'EPN d'Arlon. Elle sera complétée par "jfonda" à qui je signale que le nom du rond-point doit également être mis... | |
| 64181118 by ma-rt-in @ 2018-11-04 23:35 | 1 | 2018-11-05 10:32 | Stereo | Hallo Martin! Wieso siehst du 'note' und 'source' als überflüssig? Ich hatte es so getaggt, damit keiner, der es nur gut meint und nichts vom Condominium weiss, die Grenzen in der Moselmitte zusammenklebt. |
| 2 | 2018-11-29 12:23 | ma-rt-in ♦1,752 | Hallo Stereo,welchen genaueren Sinn haben den beide Einträge. Source wird schon seit langen überwiegend in den CS Attribute gelassen und nur selten in die Objekte selbst eingetragen.Die Note ist selbst für mich und für Anfänger noch viel weniger ein Rätsel was es be... | |
| 3 | 2018-11-29 14:07 | freebeer ♦1,598 | Is source given in the changeset comments involved with this tagging? no. therefore it is not redundant information here and by deleting it you have caused a loss of info that was presented in an accepted format at the time it was created, as well as a defended possibility even today (there was a ... | |
| 63593712 by ddoni @ 2018-10-16 23:06 | 1 | 2018-10-22 14:59 | Stereo | Hello, welcome to OSM and congratulations on your first edit!Do you maybe know if there's a path missing there, maybe steps to reach the cafe from Eqrem Qabaj?Happy mapping :) |
| 63541970 by Kosovo Info @ 2018-10-15 13:12 | 1 | 2018-10-15 15:49 | Stereo | Congratulations on your first edit! Hopefully we'll meet at the event at the Hackerspace on the 25th? |
| 50216829 by VictorIE @ 2017-07-12 02:58 | 1 | 2018-09-20 14:32 | Stereo | I'm delighted to see I'm not the only one interested in Inishtrahull :) |
| 2 | 2018-09-20 19:34 | VictorIE ♦911 | :) | |
| 62685020 by djakk @ 2018-09-18 06:15 | 1 | 2018-09-18 09:21 | PanierAvide ♦60 | Merci pour ce retour à la raison :-) Je suis certain qu'il y a des façons de répondre aux problématiques que tu poses (que ce soit par de l'analyse topologique des données, ou quand c'est impossible par l'ajout de tags). Et c'est mieux d�... |
| 2 | 2018-09-18 09:34 | djakk ♦27 | Oui j’ai quasiment tout “revert”. Je respecte le débat bien sûr, les remarques de la part de novices ou de confirmés, mais ce qui compte au final ce sont les bons arguments. Le seul argument, le seul!, que j’estime avoir reçu, c’est de ta part... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-18 10:38 | Stereo | Hello djakk! Je fais partie du Data Working Group de la fondation OSM, tiens-nous au courant s'il te faut un coup de main pour le revert. Est-ce que tu connais aussi la mailing list tagging? Ça serait à mon avis idéal pour discuter de tes idées.Guillaume | |
| 4 | 2018-09-18 11:02 | djakk ♦27 | Salut Guillaume ! C’est bon, merci, j’y suis arrivé je crois :) Il me reste le wiki et la modif “village vers town”. Ok je posterai sur cette mailing-list, merci de l’info !djakk | |
| 5 | 2018-09-18 11:41 | djakk ♦27 | Guillaume, tu parles de la taggin-list mondiale ou française (existe-t-celle celle là) ? | |
| 6 | 2018-09-18 12:17 | djakk ♦27 | Sinon je cherche un admin du wiki pour supprimer 2 images - Guillaume ? :)djakk | |
| 7 | 2018-09-18 13:38 | Stereo | La mondiale! Le tag traffic a l'air de faire ce que tu veux faire, non? Pour le wiki, je suis un mortel comme toi, mais tu peux contacter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:ListUsers/sysop | |
| 8 | 2018-09-18 14:49 | Stereo | Est-ce que tu fais vraiment des arpentages pour tes tags traffic? | |
| 9 | 2018-09-18 15:04 | djakk ♦27 | Merci. « Traffic » était une première piste, la clé a toujours son intérêt (à condition que les donnés soient copiables : la donnée vient des départements, alors j’ai supposé que c’était c... | |
| 62456464 by bylent @ 2018-09-10 14:27 | 1 | 2018-09-10 14:38 | Stereo | Hi Bylent,I'm writing to you from the OpenStreetMap Foundation's Data Working Group.Can you please tell us what your source for all the names you've been inserting is?There have been naming disputes in Kosovo in the past. The consensus we're enforcing in Kosovo is as ... |
| 2 | 2018-09-12 06:52 | bylent ♦1 | Hallo,wenn da keine Notwendigkeit wäre, würde ich da die Namen auf Englisch und Deutsch hinzufügen? Überleg mal ob ich mir die ganze Mühe machen würde. Erst überlegen, dann meinetwegen unüberlegt handeln. :\\ | |
| 62441291 by dolomynum @ 2018-09-10 06:12 | 1 | 2018-09-10 09:43 | Stereo | Are you absolutely sure? It's still listed as there on every source. |
| 2 | 2018-09-10 09:48 | dolomynum ♦12 | Hi,I got the following feedback from a user (we are developing an OSM-based navi app):"Wrong fix speed camera (130km/h) on the road N7 near position 49.77019031 / 6.08656594 => this camera does not exist at all (but well the one with max. speed 90km/h very near on the same road)"... | |
| 62412200 by dmlu @ 2018-09-08 21:33 | 1 | 2018-09-09 00:06 | Stereo | Haha yes!! |
| 61854900 by LeFagnard @ 2018-08-21 12:43 | 1 | 2018-08-21 14:19 | Stereo | Hello! Il y a https://data.public.lu/fr/datasets/limites-administratives-du-grand-duche-de-luxembourg/ comme source possible aussi, ça serait intéressant de comparer. |
| 2 | 2018-08-21 17:37 | LeFagnard ♦6 | Salut Stereo,Cela me semble intérressant.ENcore faudrait-il connaitre le moyen de visualiser les infos dans ces fichiers.Peut-être pourrais-tu me l'apprendre?Merci, | |
| 3 | 2018-08-23 11:46 | Stereo | Bien sûr! Le plus simple est sans doute avec le plugin JOSM geojson pour ouvrir communes4326.geojson, les communes allant jusqu'au bord du pays (je crois) sauf à la frontière Germano-Luxembourgeoise. Sinon, avec le plugin opendata installé, ouvrir le fichier LIMADM_PA... | |
| 4 | 2018-08-23 11:52 | Stereo | En fait je vois que LIMADM_PAYS est simplifié. Les communes alors! | |
| 5 | 2018-08-23 11:54 | Stereo | Je veux dire le fichier LIMADM_COMMUNES.shp qui a l'air le plus détaillé. Quel bazar... | |
| 6 | 2018-08-23 13:04 | LeFagnard ♦6 | Salut Stereo,Merci pour toutes les informations et explications?Les plugins fonctionnent bien.Par contre, en regardant les différence entre les datas de CADGIS Belgique et celles dans les fichiers, je contate que les Bleges sont beacupu plus détaillées.Je possède ... | |
| 7 | 2018-08-24 01:32 | LeFagnard ♦6 | Salut Stereo,Comme dit ci-dessus, les datas sont nettement plus précises chez IGN Belgique (présision 1:100000).Je vien de terminer la partie qui m'intéresse, c.à.d. la partie Ouren-Schmiede.Je travaille sur la repise des bornes historiques Prussiennes jusqu... | |
| 8 | 2018-08-26 14:40 | Stereo | Salut Marc,Tiens, j'étais justement à vélo de Troisvierges à Vaals le weekend dernier :). En Luxembourgeois, c'est « Preisen », l'adjectif « preisesch ». Je crois que les fichiers de l'IGN-BE ne sont malh... | |
| 9 | 2018-08-26 17:28 | LeFagnard ♦6 | Salut Guillaume,Oula, bonne et longue balade. T'as pris le ravel ou etais-tu en route en vélo de course par la Baraque Michel? Dans ce cas, tu es passé devant chez moi. J'habites à l'entrée d'Eupen sur la route de Malmédy.Merci pour la tra... | |
| 55923225 by bikedeluxe @ 2018-01-31 08:21 | 1 | 2018-07-26 15:21 | Stereo | Hello! I'm just wondering if this no_u_turn relation is correct: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7953754 |
| 60104736 by Maarten Deen @ 2018-06-23 16:37 | 1 | 2018-06-23 19:16 | Stereo | Hi Maarten! You’re mapping every individual course from our OpenOV GTFS? Pretty cool if so!The network shapes have just become open data, at https://data.public.lu/fr/datasets/transport-en-commun-reseau/ |
| 2 | 2018-06-24 12:17 | Maarten Deen ♦73 | The shapefiles are a nice guideline but not very accurate. It appears that Google imports them as-is, but a lot of locations of bus stops are not exactly where they are.Interestingly, the nodes for the stops have a color tag which matches the line that uses them. | |
| 3 | 2018-06-24 17:16 | Stereo | Ah, I hadn’t seen the colour tag!Google doesn’t have the line shapes yet, the open data is just a few days old and openOV hasn’t converted them to GTFS yet.Yeah, the open data stop points aren’t very good indeed. | |
| 59900733 by Daham @ 2018-06-16 19:18 | 1 | 2018-06-17 18:21 | Stereo | Hi, welcome to Luxembourg! I’m wondering where you’re finding those track refs, since you’re not indicating a source. Happy mapping :) |
| 2 | 2018-06-18 16:28 | Daham ♦8 | Thanks for the warm welcome in Lux. And: sorry for missing the source "survey". You can find those informations on small plates fixed next to the catenary. | |
| 59841137 by AVL_FLI_KA @ 2018-06-14 10:51 | 1 | 2018-06-14 12:07 | Stereo | Yes! Beim Minigolf gëtt anscheinend och geschafft: https://i.imgur.com/7kH5Sxt.jpg |
| 59602470 by CHIBUSA23 @ 2018-06-06 12:57 | 1 | 2018-06-06 13:00 | Stereo | Hello, welcome to OSM! There is, I think, no ebola in Oberkorn :). Can you please enter correct changeset comments when you upload?You can also square buildings in JOSM by hitting ‘Q’.Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 59012511 by André Da Silva @ 2018-05-16 10:25 | 1 | 2018-05-16 11:18 | Stereo | Welcome! There’s certainly enough to do in Esch. You can square buildings after drawing them by hitting ’S’. There’s a short video at http://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/. Happy mapping! Guillaume |
| 59012275 by Stijn Bossuyt @ 2018-05-16 10:16 | 1 | 2018-05-16 10:50 | Stereo | Hi Stijn! I removed the airfield there a few months back because, as far as I can tell, it isn’t being used anymore. Am I mistaken? |
| 2 | 2018-05-17 08:44 | Stijn Bossuyt ♦3 | Hi Stereo. that exactly the reason I called it "Former". the site of the touristic service of Mullerthal still mentions it, the site of the cluw however puts it now just across the border in France in Zoutphen. However constantly refering to Luxembourgish regulations. | |
| 50689549 by wilda69 @ 2017-07-30 10:18 | 1 | 2017-07-30 11:25 | Stereo | As far as I know it’s only temporarily during the construction that this is going to be rerouted. I’ll try to remember to check when the construction is done. |
| 2 | 2017-07-30 11:33 | wilda69 ♦28 | You are correct. I saw that the notices say that the basin d'orage should be completed by "September 2016!" Maybe they should change it to 2018. The deviation for the PC2 is however clearly marked | |
| 3 | 2018-05-09 12:12 | dmlu ♦164 | Hi, is there a reason why you mapped a part of the way as "Rue de la Barrière; Am Bongert"? From the official dataset, the housenumber 36 belongs to Rue de la Barrière, while 78 belongs to "Am Bongert". | |
| 4 | 2018-05-11 14:20 | Stereo | Rue de la barrière used to go south over the pétrusse where the PC1 is now. I've corrected the cut-off to the intersection. | |
| 58594535 by marc_gerges @ 2018-05-01 19:37 | 1 | 2018-05-02 08:40 | Stereo | Hah! Hi Marc, what are you trying to route? |
| 58119182 by chachas @ 2018-04-15 20:06 | 1 | 2018-04-16 13:42 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Hello! Don't put bicycle=no as this restricts all kinds of bicycle, MTB also but obvisouly MTB can ride on those tracks. This breaks also third party services for planning tours. I'm going to correct your tags. |
| 2 | 2018-04-16 13:44 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Likesie putting the opposite biycle=yes suggets that all kinds of bicycles can ride on the tracks but obviously road bicycles cannot. :) | |
| 3 | 2018-04-16 13:44 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Likewise putting the opposite* | |
| 4 | 2018-04-17 06:40 | Stereo | bicycle=* is about whether it’s legal to ride a bicycle somewhere. Whether it’s a good idea or not is something that’s best left to the smoothness, tracktype and surface tags, which have been mapped very well here. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-18 08:07 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | I know Stereo, but Chachas had put 2 days ago bicycle=no on a way which has the PC1 cycling route here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144874726/history and he commented that "the way is not adapted for road bikes". This suggests that he is misusing the tag bicycle=*, not ME, i just fol... | |
| 58144449 by chachas @ 2018-04-16 17:12 | 1 | 2018-04-16 20:37 | Stereo | Hallo chachas, wilkommen auf OSM! bicycle=yes und foot=yes sind eigentlich auf solche tracks implizit und nicht nötig. Dein taggen von surface und smoothness sind genügend und perfekt. Viel Spaß beim mappen :) |
| 57528768 by jotes @ 2018-03-26 09:46 | 1 | 2018-03-26 13:21 | Stereo | Hello, welcome to osm! If firefighters are allowed to use that path, you can add the emergency=yes tag to it. Happy mapping :) |
| 57320518 by AVL_Teix_Ga @ 2018-03-19 14:40 | 1 | 2018-03-19 15:05 | Stereo | Moien! Do kéint villäicht nach building=yes agedroe ginn, dann taucht et och als Gebei op. |
| 56929440 by AVL_FLI_KA @ 2018-03-06 09:52 | 1 | 2018-03-06 10:18 | Stereo | https://twitter.com/drobaux/status/962749642210463744 , also kann een och domat hëllefe Liewe retten :) |
| 2 | 2018-03-06 11:38 | AVL_FLI_KA ♦5 | Staark :) dann drohen mer och zu sou wichtegen Saachen bei. | |
| 56576320 by SHARCRASH @ 2018-02-22 11:09 | 1 | 2018-02-22 15:08 | Stereo | The surface=cobblestone tag can probably be improved. |
| 56085459 by mjlux @ 2018-02-05 13:44 | 1 | 2018-02-05 14:33 | Stereo | Moien a wëlkomm op OpenStreetMap,Ech froe mech, wou s du déi Nimm fonnt hues? Esou eng Quell hunn ech laang gesicht.Bescht Gréiss an happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 2 | 2018-02-05 15:05 | mjlux ♦7 | Alles op der lëtzebuergescher a franséischer Wikipedia fonnt, z.B. https://lb.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arelerland , https://lb.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gouvy asw.Happy mapping! :) | |
| 3 | 2018-02-05 18:05 | Stereo | Leider därfe mir net einfach esou aus Wikipedia kopéieren, kuck https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia | |
| 4 | 2018-02-07 12:09 | mjlux ♦7 | Merci fir de Link. Déi Nimm stinn och esou am "Luxemburger Wörterbuch". | |
| 46991276 by foxandpotatoes @ 2017-03-19 19:20 | 1 | 2018-01-09 23:11 | Stereo | Hah, you found imagery from 1971 to use? How cool. |
| 52993866 by freeclimber @ 2017-10-16 19:56 | 1 | 2018-01-09 21:31 | Stereo | Hello, vill Gléck fir 2018! Kann et sin, dat déng Orthophotoen decaléiert sin? |
| 55042158 by petz @ 2017-12-30 18:46 | 1 | 2018-01-09 14:47 | althio ♦45 | Bonjour,L'adresse indiquée utilise addr:unit qui est très rare au Luxembourg par rapport à addr:housenumberPouvons-nous vérifier ? |
| 2 | 2018-01-09 15:17 | Stereo | En effet, c'est le numéro de maison, et pas l'unité, qui n'existe pas ici. J'ai corrigé. | |
| 54984124 by Stereo @ 2017-12-28 14:00 | 1 | 2017-12-30 19:19 | mueschel ♦6,574 | Hi,could you check this way, it got two strange tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549560168Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-08 04:03 | Stereo | Indeed, thanks Jan! I've fixed it. | |
| 55137555 by CarKe6298 @ 2018-01-03 19:21 | 1 | 2018-01-04 17:35 | Stereo | Hallo (Moien?) CarKe6298! Ich weiss nicht genau, was du da machen wolltest, aber es scheint nicht geklappt zu haben :). Die Grenze zwischen den Gemeinden Sanem und Esch ist auf jedem Fall schon vom Kadaster importiert worden, hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/407473https://www.ope... |
| 55144555 by Hopla57 @ 2018-01-04 01:15 | 1 | 2018-01-04 13:06 | Stereo | Quel beau travail! Attention, comme en France, le cadastre n'est pas toujours la source la source la plus juste. Tu connais le plugin https://github.com/JOSM/areaselector ? |
| 54847595 by XY22 @ 2017-12-22 18:40 | 1 | 2017-12-22 23:09 | Stereo | I love how this is now perfectly mapped on OSM, and other maps don't even have the construction site! |
| 2 | 2017-12-23 09:34 | XY22 ♦32 | Thank you for your comment.Schéi Chrëschtdeeg | |
| 54533836 by wilda69 @ 2017-12-11 09:15 | 1 | 2017-12-12 18:20 | Stereo | Highway=virtual isn't going to route either! This is something that the routers have to fix themselves. I know graphhopper are working on it. |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 18:37 | wilda69 ♦28 | Actually it will, if you use the following code in your lines stylesheet: ("0x12" is a Garmin routable and needs to be defined transparent in your typfile; 1A can be defined whatever, in my case I have it as black dots) code:highway=virtual [0x12 road_class=1 road_speed=1 resoluti... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-13 00:18 | Stereo | That's definitely tagging for the renderer, and therefore not allowed :)https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer | |
| 4 | 2017-12-13 20:00 | wilda69 ♦28 | I suppose the virtual OSM tag is to compensate for those that sadly use polygons to plot lines ;) I am still horrified at the way Place Guillaume II and Place d'Armes have been tagged, causing steps to lead to nowhere and having a circular track you can't get to.I would say a prob... | |
| 54539940 by gcaspar @ 2017-12-11 13:26 | 1 | 2017-12-11 14:24 | Stereo | Wolls du den arret rout bréck wirklech aus all dene Buslinne läschen? |
| 2 | 2017-12-11 14:42 | Stereo | Ass gefléckt! | |
| 54525539 by s-tikhomirov @ 2017-12-11 00:13 | 1 | 2017-12-11 02:40 | Stereo | Hello! Yes, these are in Sanem. The border is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93580760Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 54456780 by X6996 @ 2017-12-08 11:52 | 1 | 2017-12-08 13:18 | tux67 ♦1,940 | Hallo X6996,willkommen bei OSM. Mit dem Ansatz jedes Gehege mit leisure=park zu versehen haben Deine Edits genau das Muster von Leuten, die versuchen, Pokémons anzulocken. Das ist bei uns unerwünscht. Bitte trage nur Dinge ein, die der Realität entsprechen!Ohne änderung... |
| 2 | 2017-12-08 16:03 | X6996 ♦1 | HalloDas ist ja mal eine nette Unterstellung. Ich habe die Anderung mit lokalem Wissen und reinen Gewissen durchgeführt. Falls sie nicht Perfekt war, ok mein Fehler aber dafür muss man nicht gleich angegiftet werden man würde die Karte für Pokemonogo verändern. Der Spi... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-08 16:39 | tux67 ♦1,940 | Danke für das Feedback. Leider ist die "Unterstellung" häufiger Realität als man wünschen würde und falls die o.g. Wortwahl zu drastisch sein sollte, entschuldige ich mich dafür. Wir sind für jede gute Erweiterung der Karte dankbar.Ich habe einen lokal... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-08 17:24 | Stereo | Moien Laurent, a Wëlkomm och op OSM!Bei deinen Edits sieht alles gut aus, und es scheint alles der Realität zu entsprechen. Nur den Bachlauf hattest du als Fluss (waterway=river) getaggt; ich habe es jetzt als Entwässerungsgraben (waterway=ditch) umgetaggt. Bei der Breite muss man... | |
| 54400751 by jennilu @ 2017-12-06 13:11 | 1 | 2017-12-06 19:09 | Stereo | Hi Jennilu, welcome to OpenStreetmap!You've actually removed correct information from those nodes, which isn't a good thing. OpenStreetMap is a common shared database, and shouldn't be damaged to fit a routing algorithm - instead, the routing algorithm should be fixed.Are you ... |
| 53437155 by Karthoo @ 2017-11-01 22:53 | 1 | 2017-12-06 02:45 | Stereo | Hallo doktorpixel14! Darf ich fragen, was deine Quelle für das CEPS ist? Viele Grüße und frohes mappen. |
| 2 | 2017-12-06 12:53 | Karthoo ♦214 | In diesem Changeset hab ich eigentlich nur die Nummern der Stationen vom Luftbild abgelesen. Ansonsten hab ich die Abschnitte über die Pfosten an der Oberfläche vor Ort erfasst. | |
| 54159486 by gcaspar @ 2017-11-28 20:05 | 1 | 2017-11-28 21:24 | Stereo | Huet de rescht gestëmmt? :)Se si nach net an iD, mais d'Loftbiller vun 2017 sin disponibel: https://{switch:wmts3,wmts4}.geoportail.lu/opendata/wmts/ortho_latest/GLOBAL_WEBMERCATOR_4_V3/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.jpeg als Couche bäisetzen. |
| 2 | 2017-12-01 07:26 | gcaspar ♦7 | hunn nach net alles gekuckt. kennen och net den läschten Stand. Vill Saachen muss een nom 10/12 op d'Plaz kucke goe.dat hei wier nemmen een routing Fehler ginn. Merci vir den Tipp mat den Loftbiller | |
| 53802640 by SHARCRASH @ 2017-11-15 12:54 | 1 | 2017-11-27 19:50 | Stereo | Je ne comprends pas "leave this node disconnected, the unstraightened area routing may mislead people", c'est un bug dans les routeurs? |
| 2 | 2017-11-27 20:48 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Le périmètre des highway areas, parkings par exemple... sontutilisés pour le routing des directions de chemin. Si ces areas là sont collés à des batiments qui ont des formes géométriques complexes, le routing suivra la géométrie c... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-27 20:55 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Voici ce que ca devrait donner avec un mapping clean (node déconnecté) par rapport au 2e exemple que j'ai donné sur mon comentaire précédent: http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=49.61047%2C6.12977%3B49.61107%2C6.13244#map=... | |
| 4 | 2017-11-27 21:00 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Un exemple bien pourri: http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=49.75837%2C6.64179%3B49.75851%2C6.63974#map=19/49.75843/6.64076 | |
| 54114695 by marc_gerges @ 2017-11-27 08:03 | 1 | 2017-11-27 13:24 | Stereo | Good riddance! |
| 54028558 by AVL_FLI_KA @ 2017-11-23 15:17 | 1 | 2017-11-23 16:11 | Stereo | Moien! Zimmlech cool mat de Loftbiller vun 2017 ze gesi wéi d'Tramsschinne guer net wäit vun der Realitéit waren :).Et sin e puer Weichen ouni Referenz, hu dir se villäicht? https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/tei |
| 2 | 2017-11-24 06:55 | AVL_FLI_KA ♦5 | Salut,Jo ass mega, hunn schon ongedelleg drop gewart :).Nee leider net, haat just Pläng wou keng Referenzen drop stoungen. | |
| 53217928 by FvGordon @ 2017-10-24 19:47 | 1 | 2017-10-24 23:07 | Stereo | Thanks, I’ve added the correct one! |
| 52971066 by Garmin-User @ 2017-10-16 04:15 | 1 | 2017-10-16 11:25 | Stereo | Diese admin_levels sind aber schon auf der relation. |
| 2 | 2017-10-16 12:01 | Garmin-User ♦335 | Stimmt natürlich. Ich habe admin_level und boundary an Members ergänzt, wo dies "fehlte". Das betraf nur einen kleinen Teil in Bezug zum Rest, der in Ordnung ist. So ist es einheitlich und erleichtert u.U. die Unterscheidung von anderen Objekten bei Edits, wenn Relationen nicht g... | |
| 52860501 by freeclimber @ 2017-10-12 13:45 | 1 | 2017-10-12 15:41 | Stereo | Hello! Kenns du schon http://regio-osm.de/hausnummerauswertung/auswertung_anzeigen?job_ids=24607&land=Luxembourg&stadt=Differdange ? |
| 2 | 2017-10-13 21:05 | freeclimber ♦2 | Salut, nee kennen ech nach net. Merci fir de Link. | |
| 52628240 by Pmz @ 2017-10-04 15:09 | 1 | 2017-10-04 16:06 | Stereo | Déjà! Merci! |
| 2 | 2017-10-04 16:07 | Stereo | T’es certain du highway=primary et pas secondary par contre? | |
| 52266859 by marc_gerges @ 2017-09-22 07:25 | 1 | 2017-09-22 10:32 | Stereo | Looks perfect :) |
| 52236881 by marc_gerges @ 2017-09-21 08:19 | 1 | 2017-09-21 09:34 | Stereo | Is it one-way for bicycles too? |
| 2 | 2017-09-21 10:13 | marc_gerges ♦2 | I am not sure, will check this tomorrow when passing there | |
| 52002656 by henkuit54 @ 2017-09-13 11:05 | 1 | 2017-09-13 11:25 | Stereo | I’m not sure that’s really in Nepal :) |
| 2 | 2017-09-13 19:02 | henkuit54 ♦1 | I'm sure this really is not Nepal! I'm new to editing OSM, so I didn't notice I was still in the changeset I was working on in Nepal. I did stop that, but ... | |
| 51729358 by helicoducair @ 2017-09-04 19:33 | 1 | 2017-09-04 20:01 | Stereo | Schade, dass aeroway=parking_position nicht gerendert wird... https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1610 |
| 51662407 by SHARCRASH @ 2017-09-02 07:21 | 1 | 2017-09-03 08:17 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!Please review highway=crossing + footway=crossing on some ways. The correct tagging is highway=footway + footway=crossingSee http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 14:47 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Hello! This is quite misleading! The page you shared is the one i had seen recently and what i have done actually for this changeset. I had already used the combination highway=footway + footway=crossing though but i don't use very often urban elements, so i had to check again, was confused and... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-04 17:59 | Stereo | The crossing=zebra tag is, unfortunately, incorrect. I try to replace it with crossing=uncontrolled/traffic_signals/unmarked when I come across it. Apparently there's more than 1000 in Luxembourg :-/. | |
| 4 | 2017-09-04 22:54 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Yeah people tend to imitate what they see often, even unknowingly errors assuming it is correct. I've changed the tags i had edited in this area with crossing=traffic_signals or uncontrolledcrossing_ref=zebrafootway=crossinghighway=footway | |
| 51694149 by Maarten Deen @ 2017-09-03 14:25 | 1 | 2017-09-03 14:34 | Stereo | I'm just so happy you're doing all this good work with the RGTR lines. |
| 51118047 by wilda69 @ 2017-08-14 18:05 | 1 | 2017-08-14 20:45 | Stereo | That must have been a pleasant survey :). |
| 51039728 by Loll78 @ 2017-08-11 16:50 | 1 | 2017-08-11 22:44 | Stereo | Pass op, du hues do d’Buslinne futti gemach! |
| 50880733 by Maarten Deen @ 2017-08-06 10:28 | 1 | 2017-08-06 12:14 | Stereo | This is great, thank you! |
| 2 | 2017-08-06 20:12 | Maarten Deen ♦73 | Thanks! | |
| 50676209 by s-tikhomirov @ 2017-07-29 16:49 | 1 | 2017-07-30 11:28 | Stereo | Hi! The version of JOSM that’s bundled with Debian is quite old. Using a more recent version will let you for example apply layer filters, which is really useful to make the 2016 and 2013 imagery easier to distinguish. Happy mapping! |
| 50666823 by wilda69 @ 2017-07-29 08:40 | 1 | 2017-07-29 16:39 | Stereo | Oh, that’s very useful to know! Thanks! |
| 2 | 2017-07-30 07:40 | wilda69 ♦28 | Ive plotted it how it is now, and suspect wef September the NE corner will all be construction | |
| 3 | 2017-07-30 07:41 | wilda69 ♦28 | Ofcourse ment NW corner ;) | |
| 50459580 by pdsp2808 @ 2017-07-21 13:45 | 1 | 2017-07-26 06:37 | nammala ♦517 | Hi,Noticed that you have been random tags to buildings. Could you please confirm the edits.regards,nammala |
| 2 | 2017-07-26 18:49 | Stereo | Hi Nammala! What random tags, addr:street=maison? It’s unfortunately still common in small Luxembourgish villages to have no street names, so people just live in house 10, etc. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-27 04:07 | nammala ♦517 | Hi Stereo,This one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352154840/history#map=19/49.88374/6.25656 | |
| 50525908 by Correcaminos604 @ 2017-07-24 11:48 | 1 | 2017-07-24 13:23 | Stereo | Bonjour,Qui sont les éditeurs de cartes reconnus? Nous n’avons pas le droit de copier d’autres cartes. |
| 2 | 2017-07-24 15:11 | Correcaminos604 ♦6 | Comment dois-je répondre à cela??Le classement des routes et rues sur Arlon était assez aléatoire et j'ai donc cherché à requalifier les routes principales de façon cohérente à partir de ma connaissance des lieux tout en objectiva... | |
| 50268387 by ridixcr @ 2017-07-13 21:14 | 1 | 2017-07-13 22:03 | Stereo | Cheers :)I see you’re editing for the mapbox global team, did you see we also have more recent, better imagery from 2016?(Would you know if we could get it integrated into mapbox satellite? It’s licensed under CC-0.) |
| 50242501 by ridixcr @ 2017-07-12 22:32 | 1 | 2017-07-12 23:49 | Stereo | Dude. It said "New outdoor fitness (athletics, bars) near completion.” in the changeset comment. Of course there’s no visible geometry, and now our newbie is potentially confused. |
| 2 | 2017-07-13 06:36 | ridixcr ♦87 | Hi! 👋Thanks for the clarification 💡I proceeded to reverse my changesetshave nice day 🙇 | |
| 3 | 2017-07-13 14:06 | Stereo | Cheers! You too! | |
| 49403670 by scleija @ 2017-06-09 17:38 | 1 | 2017-06-09 17:43 | Stereo | You can actually add the ortho 2016 pictures in Go Map. PM me if you’re interested. Happy mapping! |
| 49252828 by peter_osm @ 2017-06-04 22:30 | 1 | 2017-06-05 08:56 | Stereo | Hello! Be careful, you’ve now got contradicting tags on, for example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118876578 - maxspeed and maxspeed:backwards are different. Happy mapping! |
| 2 | 2017-06-05 19:43 | peter_osm ♦9 | Hi StereoI thought I got all the tags, but one fell through the cracks. Thanks for your hint, I corrected it already. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-07 10:06 | Stereo | Cool! Thanks! | |
| 49239163 by ikew @ 2017-06-04 10:48 | 1 | 2017-06-04 11:13 | Stereo | Hallo, wilkommen auf OpenStreetMap! Da es den Weg immerin gibt, habe ich es als privat bezeichnet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49239770 |
| 49200035 by Spicy_lazy_kat @ 2017-06-02 15:36 | 1 | 2017-06-02 16:32 | Stereo | Hello! Monterey is actually access=destination, that’s what the white circle with a red border means in Luxembourg. That way, someone making a delivery to the Singer shop or driving to one of the underground parkings can still use the road.Would you like me to correct the map there? |
| 2 | 2017-06-02 19:47 | Spicy_lazy_kat ♦5 | Hi,Yes please change this, I didn't check the sign. | |
| 49077610 by xXMapperXx @ 2017-05-29 15:53 | 1 | 2017-05-29 17:14 | Stereo | Those look correct! |
| 2 | 2017-06-03 05:20 | xXMapperXx ♦5 | Well, they shared lines, which I was told was depreciated | |
| 48963415 by xXMapperXx @ 2017-05-25 06:02 | 1 | 2017-05-26 11:45 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Please, do not make cliffs a closed round way, or they won't render in Mapnik and other maps. I think this is the case also with other elements. That's why i created all those rocky cliffs with 2 seperate lines. |
| 2 | 2017-05-28 09:32 | Stereo | https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/268 says circular cliffs should work as soon as the next version of carto makes it to production. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-29 09:47 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Yeah but for now it doesn't, so in my opinion this little hack does the job without compromising the future fix. | |
| 48739529 by Paddy1984 @ 2017-05-16 18:41 | 1 | 2017-05-27 07:58 | Stereo | Super! Und du hast es bis zu http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nammala/diary/41413 gepackt :) |
| 2 | 2017-05-29 22:59 | Verdy_p ♦105 | see also the details in:- Parc du Thabor, Rennes, France (http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/48.11397/-1.66902), or- Jardins du Palais de Versailles, France(http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/48.80568/2.11634)- Villa Borghese, Roma, Italia (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48739529... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-29 23:02 | Verdy_p ♦105 | The two previous examples in France are even more precise (geometrically, with 10cm precision and precise alignment) | |
| 4 | 2017-05-30 12:41 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | In meinen Augen ist das Schloss ein Gebäude und daher habe ich building=yes wieder ergänzt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49102958 | |
| 48979398 by bferreira @ 2017-05-25 17:02 | 1 | 2017-05-26 10:00 | Stereo | Hi! I saw your changes and notes. On one hand, yes, they’re no longer communes. On the other, the lines are still the limits between the localities, so they should be adapted to reflect that. |
| 48572531 by helicoducair @ 2017-05-10 19:42 | 1 | 2017-05-10 20:43 | Stereo | Cool for openrailwaymap.org :) |
| 48161381 by scleija @ 2017-04-26 12:15 | 1 | 2017-04-26 12:24 | Stereo | Hello! What would you think of tagging the forests with both name=<Luxembourgish name> and name:de=<German name> and/or name:fr=<French name>?Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 48003882 by sma352 @ 2017-04-21 13:49 | 1 | 2017-04-21 15:30 | Stereo | Hello! The Cafetin was already mapped on the building :) |
| 47252463 by 0belix999 @ 2017-03-29 08:37 | 1 | 2017-03-29 10:09 | Stereo | Thanks for checking this :) |
| 47173631 by Steven Ferreira @ 2017-03-26 12:17 | 1 | 2017-03-27 00:14 | Stereo | Hello! I think that you made an honest mistake here: the Kockelscheuer forest isn’t a park, the outline of it isn’t a footway, and the water bodies inside of it isn’t a reservoir. I see that another user has already undone most of your changes.Please don’t let this discou... |
| 47149199 by Loll78 @ 2017-03-25 12:12 | 1 | 2017-03-25 18:04 | Stereo | Ah, du wars méi séier wi ech :). Wars du och scho sur place? |
| 47095257 by Der Harry @ 2017-03-23 12:04 | 1 | 2017-03-23 14:57 | Stereo | Danke! |
| 47026885 by Polyglot @ 2017-03-20 23:46 | 1 | 2017-03-21 11:09 | Stereo | Great to see you’re active in our area again :) |
| 2 | 2017-03-21 21:43 | Polyglot ♦86 | Yes, little by little. In fact I'm preparing a new GSoC project: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/2017/JOSM_Plugins Trying to find issues with the PT_Assistant plugin | |
| 3 | 2017-03-22 14:46 | Stereo | Awesome! The 2016 vintage has been so useful, it's great that you're going for it again. There has been no interest in my GSoC proposal so far – any takers for yours?I'm seeing duplicate ways being introduced, and I'm not sure whether it's the plugin:https://ww... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-22 14:47 | Stereo | Two more:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481437499https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56092848 | |
| 5 | 2017-03-22 15:44 | Polyglot ♦86 | I'm afraid it's probably me | |
| 46912817 by kewl @ 2017-03-16 22:47 | 1 | 2017-03-17 10:45 | Stereo | Exciting! Steep? |
| 2 | 2017-03-17 12:04 | kewl ♦9 | A little bit, but it goes to the stargazing point I mentioned last weekend, so it's worth the effort ;-) | |
| 46694504 by ericdsob @ 2017-03-08 23:00 | 1 | 2017-03-08 23:16 | Stereo | Oui, c’est parfait comme ça. Il faut en effet l’adresse complète pour pouvoir planifier l’itinéraire. |
| 46637945 by Dagou @ 2017-03-07 00:06 | 1 | 2017-03-07 12:28 | Stereo | Je ne savais pas que les couches du cadastre marchaient aussi avec Vespucci! Ça fonctionne bien? |
| 2 | 2017-03-12 18:01 | Dagou ♦3 | Oui, en fait c'est par l'intermédiaire de geoportail apparemment. | |
| 46493949 by scleija @ 2017-03-01 13:09 | 1 | 2017-03-01 13:32 | Stereo | Hi scleija! You’re right, it’s not a hamlet. Since there still *is* such a place, I’ve re-tagged it as ‘place=isolated_dwelling’. Please, once again, be careful about deleting objects that might be useful to others.Guillaume |
| 46485448 by Rickychiang0330 @ 2017-03-01 06:07 | 1 | 2017-03-01 09:50 | Stereo | Hello, the Bock (貝克) is actually on the other side! |
| 46393195 by scleija @ 2017-02-25 13:35 | 1 | 2017-02-25 18:19 | Stereo | Hi, and welcome to OSM!We have a low-traffic Luxembourg mailing list at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-luand a slow wiki at wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/LuxembourgWhy were these trees superfluous? If someone’s taken the time to map trees, they must have been important t... |
| 2 | 2017-02-26 01:36 | Verdy_p ♦105 | I agree, notably for this place where it is a public parc with significant public investments by the municipality: this is a place to visit and take leasure time.The only reason why one would remove them would be to add more precise data with species, tree sizes... This is not just a large area of... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-27 12:40 | Stereo | Hi! I've re-planted the trees at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46441452 | |
| 4 | 2017-02-28 07:22 | scleija ♦2 | If there were only one tree in the entire park, it would make sense to add a tree, as a landmark, that would actually help the map reader. There are many trees in the park, like in a forest. The use of the area tool is sufficient. The addition of random trees does not make the map better, it just ma... | |
| 5 | 2017-02-28 16:40 | Stereo | Are you maybe coming from Wikipedia, which has notability criteria? OpenStreetMap has no such thing (although in practical terms, people don't usually map things that are smaller than 30 cm).The welcome guide for Wikipedians ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Wikipedia_users... | |
| 6 | 2017-02-28 17:14 | Verdy_p ♦105 | I'm not a newbie on OSM. An no, I'm not concerned about Wikipedia notability rules which are independant. In fact wood areas make sense (instead of indivual trees) when the trees are packed together (with touching/mixing branches and leaves) and the area includes trees with very variable s... | |
| 7 | 2017-02-28 17:21 | Verdy_p ♦105 | Those that don't like indivusal trees would prefer mapping areas for adding things such as species (but in fact this is wrong in many cases as wooded areas and forest have many species and trees are not the only elements), or want to map owned parcels of land. Take this map example, there'... | |
| 46441866 by scleija @ 2017-02-27 12:59 | 1 | 2017-02-27 13:06 | Stereo | Hi! I don’t know if you’re seeing my messages, can you please comment?If you look at the rest of the country, you’ll see that we usually tag the church names after the saints - "Église Saint-Joseph” would be correct here. That this is the Alzénger Kierc... |
| 2 | 2017-02-28 07:10 | scleija ♦2 | 1) Who is we?2) Why French? We are in Luxembourg. I suggest "Saint-Joseph Kierch". | |
| 3 | 2017-02-28 16:13 | Stereo | Hey, thanks for replying. 'We' is just how I see the community consensus in Luxembourg. It is a bit of a special case in the OSM community, since we're such a mix of languages, and the 'on the ground' rule that's so helpful elsewhere is harder to apply. Indeed, you do f... | |
| 46441314 by Steven Ferreira @ 2017-02-27 12:34 | 1 | 2017-02-27 13:08 | Stereo | Hi! (Moien? Bonjour? Hallo?)Since the paths in the park are officially open to bicycles, I’d tagged those as highway=path. A highway=footway that’s bicycle=designated seems contradictory.What do you think?Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 2 | 2017-02-27 17:39 | Steven Ferreira ♦1 | Hi!Well to be honest i think it's still better footway because in any park you can use your bicycle.Also to keep consistency with the other parks, a footway would be more appropriate.Happy mapping too:),Steven | |
| 46406418 by Verdy_p @ 2017-02-26 01:43 | 1 | 2017-02-26 18:14 | Stereo | T’as remis les arbres que scleija avait effacés?Les photos sont d’août dernier, ça va hein ;-p |
| 2 | 2017-02-26 20:11 | Verdy_p ♦105 | Non pas du tout. Mais les photos aériennes de Bing semblent anciennes et montrent la zone de travaux alors que les photos de terrain montrent la mairie construite. Le parc est peut-être réaménagé...Je ne me firais donc pas à l'imagerie Bing , je n'... | |
| 46379653 by Prince Kassad @ 2017-02-24 20:53 Active block | 1 | 2017-02-25 12:22 | Stereo | Hi! The version of JOSM you’re using, 6388, is from November 2013. There have been many improvements and fixes since. Is there a bug that’s stopping you from upgrading?Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 2 | 2017-02-25 17:33 | Prince Kassad Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-25 18:09 | Stereo | Oh, that's solvable: source=local knowledge, or common knowledge, or extrapolation are the ones I use. I think that recent versions actually let you leave that field blank - but other mappers appreciate good changeset data :) | |
| 46306766 by xXMapperXx @ 2017-02-22 13:09 | 1 | 2017-02-22 15:59 | Stereo | It is the correct tagging :) |
| 45944075 by Vietwoojagig @ 2017-02-09 11:00 | 1 | 2017-02-09 12:47 | Stereo | Hi! Are you sure? The paint on the asphalt says “BUS” in the august 2016 pictures, which is why I tagged them as bus lanes, but then I wasn’t there.way 303435609 might need to be retagged too.Happy mapping! |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 19:18 | Vietwoojagig ♦3 | I was driving that street today.The BUS painting has been removed and the street is open to everyone | |
| 45893320 by Stereo_repair @ 2017-02-07 18:36 | 1 | 2017-02-08 06:08 | Stereo | The changeset comment should read:Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 |
| 45857311 by gcaspar @ 2017-02-06 14:21 | 1 | 2017-02-06 16:11 | Stereo | Yay! |
| 45725004 by Dagou @ 2017-02-01 19:24 | 1 | 2017-02-02 11:22 | Stereo | Super, j’ai commencé à mettre à jour avec les photos de 2016, mais ça avance vite! Tu les as dans Vespucci aussi? |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 23:22 | Dagou ♦3 | Salut, pas vraiment : elles sont apparue dans la liste, mais elles n'apparaissaient pas quand je les sélectionnais. Depuis elles ont disparue de la liste. 2013 est le max. Du coup je complète avec des traces GPS. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-04 10:02 | Stereo | Ah, dommage! D’après https://github.com/MarcusWolschon/osmeditor4android/issues/250 tu peux les rajouter dans ton imagery.json. L’url à rajouter pour les Ortho 2016 serait https://{switch:wmts3,wmts4}.geoportail.lu/opendata/wmts/ortho_2016/GLOBAL_WEBMERCATOR_4_V3/{zoom}/{x}... | |
| 45717513 by FrViPofm @ 2017-02-01 14:05 | 1 | 2017-02-01 15:34 | streckenkundler ♦1,042 | Why do you record not your changes to the Forum or the mailing list? I miss a list of proposed changes since changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44987328All massive changes on trees are not discussed!!! |
| 2 | 2017-02-01 17:20 | FrViPofm ♦11 | Hi,I've been very active in the past on mailing lists, mainly in French, but also in English, a pity, never in German.But I'm a little tired of talking today : what can I do with that : https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958It seemed to me obvious that normalizing... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-01 21:03 | streckenkundler ♦1,042 | Good evening...Ok, the child fell into the well... (german proverb).Also I have great interest, that the plants name are correct. Your idea was very good.Let us sort it. First of all: please write the changes that you've written here, also o a new site in a table at the OSM-WIKI wit... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-01 21:33 | FrViPofm ♦11 | My mistake may come from :species:it =Platano comuneand https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platane_commun that say : Platanus ×hispanicaBut also https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platanus gives : Platanus acerifolia (Aiton) Willd. - platano comune | |
| 5 | 2017-02-01 21:38 | FrViPofm ♦11 | And more : in the Bologna import, the (usualy) 3 letters value of species tag is an abbreviation of the binomial name. So Pla = *Pl*atanus *a*cerifolia = Platanus × hispanica | |
| 6 | 2017-02-02 17:35 | Stereo | Bonjour FrViPofm,Si tu veux, on peut parler en Français et/ou en privé.I'm delighted to see that a conversation has begun. Your massive edits aren't a bad idea, and I hope that you won't let the DWG's block discourage you.You *must absolutely* discuss th... | |
| 7 | 2017-02-02 20:39 | streckenkundler ♦1,042 | Good evening FrViPofm.I think it is quite important that you write the documentation. That brings peace and others know what you've done. Is it not more.The genus Platanus....I think the genus Platanus seems to be a very specific genus with various errors in the names of plants. ... | |
| 8 | 2017-02-04 09:53 | Stereo_repair ♦410 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45798879 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 9 | 2017-02-04 10:08 | Stereo_repair ♦410 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45800694 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 10 | 2017-02-06 04:30 | Stereo_repair ♦410 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45838308 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 11 | 2017-02-06 11:04 | Stereo_repair ♦410 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45852519 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 12 | 2017-02-06 12:08 | Stereo_repair ♦410 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45853882 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 13 | 2017-02-07 02:16 | Stereo_repair ♦410 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45854666 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 14 | 2017-02-07 03:18 | Stereo_repair ♦410 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45872554 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958 | |
| 45214763 by Stereo @ 2017-01-16 12:41 | 1 | 2017-01-17 11:48 | mueschel ♦6,574 | Could you please stop adding your personal fantasy about tagging again and again and stop vandalizing OSM data? |
| 2 | 2017-01-17 21:43 | trial ♦870 | +1, please at least describe what you want to do. Except BS I mean. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-02 16:59 | Stereo | Of course it's partly meant as a joke. At the SotM EU, we came across this strange box, and decided to dedicate it as a monument to RichardF. The RichardF box does exist, and the physical properties are all correct. Someone even slapped a "Surveyed by OSM" sticker on it.It is an e... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-02 18:12 | mueschel ♦6,574 | And this "joke" now renders on every map as a huge pile of Unicode garbage, gives errors because of incorrect units in the height tag and service_times that don't follow the documented tagging rules. | |
| 5 | 2017-02-02 19:38 | trial ♦870 | Not on every map, http://b.tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=20&lat=49.0107&lon=8.38717&layers=B0000000FFFFFF renders it properly. Both renderers are based on the same stack.But please move your tests to http://www.opengeofiction.net/#map=5/51.500/-0.100 and add the link or the Wiki so that ... | |
| 6 | 2017-02-02 19:50 | mueschel ♦6,574 | The name:fr tag, which is rendered by openstreetmap.fr doesn't contain the Unicode stuff. The default osm.org map shows the Unicode properly, too. But tag is just a collection of Unicode weirdness without any meaning. | |
| 7 | 2017-02-02 20:03 | trial ♦870 | Right. Time to cleanup! | |
| 45476109 by Frédéric Gutkin @ 2017-01-25 13:41 | 1 | 2017-01-25 13:52 | Stereo | Mea culpa. Merci! |
| 2 | 2017-01-25 22:37 | Frédéric Gutkin ♦15 | Pas de problème, Guillaume !Dieu sait si les multipolygones m'ont parfois aussi joué des tours.Cordialement,Frédéric | |
| 44042511 by Ali_Alg @ 2016-11-29 19:31 | 1 | 2017-01-09 19:54 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hello,Your changeset comment says that you used Google as a source in this changeset. We are not allowed to copy from Google (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to not do this again. We (OpenStreetMap'... |
| 2 | 2017-01-09 19:55 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | مرحبا،يقول changeset تعليقك الذي استخدمته جوجل كمصدر في هذا changeset. نحن لا يسمح لنا لنسخ من جوجل (انظر https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F لمزيد من التفاصي... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-09 19:56 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Bonjour,Votre commentaire sur le jeu de modifications indique que vous avez utilisé Google comme source dans ce jeu de modifications. Nous ne sommes pas autorisés à copier de Google (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_fro... | |
| 4 | 2017-01-20 10:34 | Ali_Alg ♦2 | Source utilisé est image free de Google et parcours sur terrain | |
| 5 | 2017-01-21 14:57 | Stereo | Bonjour,Les images de Google ne sont malheureusement pas 'free' - elles sont gratuites, mais pas libres. Merci de ne plus les utiliser. | |
| 6 | 2017-01-22 00:30 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45360825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google tracing usage | |
| 45301790 by glglgl @ 2017-01-19 16:30 | 1 | 2017-01-19 17:59 | Stereo | Dafür ist im “Relation Toolbox” Plugin die Funktion “Rebuild polygon” super. |
| 45253555 by Laurent75 @ 2017-01-17 20:27 | 1 | 2017-01-18 14:00 | Stereo | Salut! Hues du gesin, dat mer elo och Biller vun 2016 vum geoportal hun? |
| 45249716 by Klumbumbus @ 2017-01-17 18:24 | 1 | 2017-01-17 18:58 | Stereo | Yay, new imagery :) |
| 2 | 2017-01-17 19:19 | Klumbumbus ♦100 | :D | |
| 3 | 2017-01-17 19:22 | Klumbumbus ♦100 | Lucky people in Luxembourg :) In most parts of Germany bing from 2012 is the only available source :( | |
| 45218975 by jln35 @ 2017-01-16 15:56 | 1 | 2017-01-17 18:13 | Stereo | Hi! I usually set the villa name inside the addr:housename, as suggested by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr . What do you think? |
| 2 | 2017-01-18 10:28 | jln35 ♦1 | Oui, c'est une bonne idée : je n'avais pas remarqué cette clé ! Pensez-vous qu'il faudrait que je revienne sur tous les noms que j'aidonnés avec la clé "name" de "building" ? J'en ai mis des quantités sur... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-21 18:20 | trial ♦870 | Comme il vous écrit en anglais et que vous répondez en français, je continue la discussion. Effectivement ce sont plutôt des housemummer, de même pour building=residential, je pense que pour une villa c'est plutôt building=house.Grosso modo je dirais vi... | |
| 4 | 2017-01-27 09:25 | jln35 ♦1 | Le nom correct est celui inscrit par Stereo. J'ai supprimé mon ajout erroné après avoir été sur place.Le problème concret vient de l'interface de l'éditeur ID qui ne place pas la clé "housename" dans les champs d�... | |
| 45246265 by Frédéric Gutkin @ 2017-01-17 15:59 | 1 | 2017-01-17 18:11 | Stereo | Hello,Have you seen that the 2016 imagery is now available under 'geoportail.lu' in the Imagery menu?Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 2 | 2017-01-17 22:04 | Frédéric Gutkin ♦15 | Hello Guillaume,Thank you very much for your advice.From now on, I will use this layer for mapping...Best regards,Frédéric | |
| 45216357 by juminet @ 2017-01-16 13:54 | 1 | 2017-01-16 16:00 | Stereo | Ok, je vois que c'est pas tombé en marche pour l'autre inner. J'ai ouvert un bug: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2550 |
| 2 | 2017-01-16 16:01 | Stereo | Oops, sorry, in English. I see that it hasn't fixed the issue for the other inner forest, and have opened a bug. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-17 09:47 | juminet ♦99 | Bonjour, Meanwhile, I changed a forest polygon into a MP and made some holes corresponding to 2 ponds & 1 meadow (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6887348) and the rendering is OK. Strange that this bug only occurs when the 2 polygons should be rendered equally (as there is no different... | |
| 45012487 by alexwolf23 @ 2017-01-08 21:40 | 1 | 2017-01-11 15:20 | Stereo | Und, geht es? :)Objekte, die nur `name=*` haben, werden normalerweise nicht gezeigt. Verschiedene QS-Tools zeigen das auch als Fehler an. Du müsstest z.B. `amenity=shop` und `shop=squirrel` hinzufügen. |
| 2 | 2017-01-11 20:48 | alexwolf23 ♦1 | ja klappt :) | |
| 44811173 by laufor @ 2016-12-31 17:32 | 1 | 2016-12-31 17:41 | Stereo | Hi! Is there somewhere I can read about this import? |
| 31568572 by TestsGalore @ 2015-05-29 17:36 | 1 | 2016-12-30 09:01 | Stereo | What's your source for the jellyfish? I couldn't see the evil on Bing. |
| 44514796 by Pmz @ 2016-12-19 12:20 | 1 | 2016-12-29 10:55 | Stereo | Ah t'as été le plus rapide, merci :D |
| 44692454 by Stereo @ 2016-12-26 22:02 | 1 | 2016-12-28 12:31 | Erdrandbewohner ♦19 | Rolltreppe Tiefgarage? Nein, das ist ein ganz normales Treppenhaus, welches die Tiefgarage mit der Platzoberfläche verbindet. Ich benenne es mal um. :) |
| 2 | 2016-12-28 22:02 | Stereo | Aha, danke dir! | |
| 44310917 by Emilio Gomez @ 2016-12-10 20:13 | 1 | 2016-12-13 20:49 | Stereo | Hi! Did you mean to delete all these ways, or was it an accident? |
| 2 | 2016-12-13 21:11 | Emilio Gomez ♦11 | Hi Stereo. I am redraw precisely the land uses of that area. The eliminated geometries (a great relation) were part of the importation of Corine, whose quality leaves much to be desired. After trying to improve the accuracy I came to the conclusion that it is easier to erase it and start from scratc... | |
| 3 | 2016-12-13 21:13 | Stereo | You're fast to reply! :)Yeah, Corine is the same everywhere. Are you just drawing from the PNOA images? I see you've tagged one forest as eucalyptus, how can I tell if I want to map too? | |
| 4 | 2016-12-13 21:26 | Emilio Gomez ♦11 | I live near this area and here, in Cantabria, almost all forest plantations are made of eucalyptus globulus. When you've been looking at eucalyptus and more eucalyptus trees for a long time, you recognize them right away. I use PNOA and Bing indistinctly because sometimes plantations have been ... | |
| 44301666 by Stéphane Gleizes @ 2016-12-10 11:59 | 1 | 2016-12-10 12:03 | Stereo | Hi neighbour! Welcome to OSM, have fun mapping! Have you seen that there’s more than one background imagery layer you can trace from? |
| 44208870 by Stereo @ 2016-12-06 13:03 | 1 | 2016-12-09 21:20 | mueschel ♦6,574 | Hi,I found the keys ref:FLIK and ref:flik - can you just use one spelling? Btw, did you check that this source is licensed in a way compatible to OSM?Jan |
| 2 | 2016-12-10 02:43 | Stereo | Hi Jan,Yes, the data is CC-0, https://data.public.lu/en/datasets/referentiel-des-parcelles-agricoles-flik/You’re right that it’s not good to mix the case; I’ll correct the lowercase to FLIK. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-10 03:07 | Stereo | Done, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44295866Thank you for making me aware of this! | |
| 44279247 by cricri9be @ 2016-12-09 11:00 | 1 | 2016-12-10 00:40 | Stereo | Hello! Les clôtures que tu as effacées existent en vrai; je les ai remises. C'est quoi le problème que tu rencontres avec xplane? On peut peut-être demander à Austin de corriger ça au niveau de xplane, ou trouver une autre façon de tagger ça... |
| 44257242 by Damien103 @ 2016-12-08 12:42 | 1 | 2016-12-08 14:52 | Stereo | Bonjour, bienvenue! Attention, les modifications faites sont directement reprises sur la carte. J’ai annulé ces changements. |
| 43741663 by LogicalViolinist @ 2016-11-17 19:46 | 1 | 2016-11-18 14:31 | Stereo | Awesome! Thanks!! |
| 2 | 2016-11-18 16:10 | DenisCarriere ♦31 | Woot! 🚀🚀 | |
| 3 | 2016-11-19 06:32 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618 | |
| 43747057 by Stereo @ 2016-11-17 22:11 | 1 | 2016-11-17 23:29 | Stereo | Source = very_local_knowledge |
| 43726311 by Degerlocher @ 2016-11-17 11:44 | 1 | 2016-11-17 16:20 | Stereo | Oh I was totally off track then. Thanks! :) |
| 43727187 by phil-x @ 2016-11-17 12:02 | 1 | 2016-11-17 16:19 | Stereo | Hi again! If you tag the building itself as building=ruins, it will render on the map.I’d tag it as building=ruins ruins=chapel and leave out the name tag because that isn’t really the name.Happy mapping! |
| 2 | 2016-11-17 19:07 | phil-x ♦2 | i tagged it as historicals site and named it "ruins of a chapel" | |
| 3 | 2016-11-17 19:09 | phil-x ♦2 | oh i think i got it i changed some things! | |
| 42816867 by phil-x @ 2016-10-12 00:07 | 1 | 2016-11-15 03:46 | Stereo | Is it really the place to be? :) |
| 2 | 2016-11-15 10:50 | phil-x ♦2 | Hello Stereo, finally someone found it, did you change it? Just wanted to see how long it takes for people to see that. :P | |
| 3 | 2016-11-16 16:50 | Stereo | Hah, now that's evil! Did you leave any others? | |
| 4 | 2016-11-16 23:38 | phil-x ♦2 | well maybe you find something else haha, ye only 2-3 but i edited already like 100 things correctly so it's just to see what happens. 1 tip 2 things are from Game of Thrones. | |
| 5 | 2016-11-17 00:04 | Stereo | Hmm, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4449776840 maybe?What's the third one? :) | |
| 6 | 2016-11-17 00:08 | Stereo | Found it,way 447921578node 4449776454You actually don't need to tag stuff as both a node and a way since there's only one object - tagging just the way as Deepwood Motte would have been enough.I've deleted both. Happy mapping :) | |
| 7 | 2016-11-17 11:55 | phil-x ♦2 | Great man gj! I see you have already 3200 things changed are you a member of openstreetmap's team? The last one is not worth it, it might even be correct. Greetings! | |
| 8 | 2016-11-17 13:07 | Stereo | "might even be correct", hah. Really? Okay, what is it?I'm a regular mapper like you! No official capacity or anything. | |
| 43602176 by wuff57 @ 2016-11-13 11:19 | 1 | 2016-11-13 11:57 | Stereo | Hi! I don’t know if you’ve seen that the upper Chiers is mapped further up, up to its spring at node 2304188384? Should that part be added? I don't know what you’re using these relation for, so I don’t want to break things. |
| 2 | 2016-11-13 21:09 | wuff57 ♦42 | Hi Stereo, thanks for pointing this out. French wikipedia is not specific about the Chiers' spring, so I did not notice the "real" upper section. I have now seen, that there is a bit more in the Luxemburg Wikipedia. I added the section. In general, waterways are tagged as relation of ... | |
| 43552063 by glglgl @ 2016-11-11 07:06 | 1 | 2016-11-11 11:25 | Stereo | Thanks :) |
| 2 | 2016-11-11 11:31 | glglgl ♦274 | You're welcome.http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43551531 in order to find the other one in a simpler way. | |
| 43359538 by SHARCRASH @ 2016-11-02 18:16 | 1 | 2016-11-02 18:40 | Stereo | Hello! Le tag highway=no est à éviter: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3DnoComme tu joues au golf ;), tu as vu les tags pour mapper les terrains de golf? |
| 2 | 2016-11-02 20:56 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Oui j'ai vu, mais déprécié n'est pas forcément interdit (highway key can have "user defined" values) et surtout dans ce cas il n'est pas du tout redondant étant donné que je l'ajoute pour éviter que le périmè... | |
| 3 | 2016-11-03 12:43 | Stereo | C'est quel logiciel de routage qui fait ça? On dirait un bug!Si c'est utile pour l'édition avec iD, ça serait possible de les virer avant d'uploader? | |
| 4 | 2016-11-03 13:18 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Guillaume, ce n'est pas un logiciel spécifique mais plusieurs services tiers que ce soit logiciel (Garmin) ou online (Openrouteservice.org ou Graphhoper, OSRM... qui sont d'ailleurs liés à Openstreetmap.org ou Gpsies par exemple). Exemple que j'ai mis en place et ... | |
| 5 | 2016-11-03 20:18 | Stereo | Ah, le problème de la squelettisation topologique, ok. Oui, aucun logiciel de routage ne le fait. Il faudrait un sacré algorithme qui sache connecter chaque adresse sur la place Guillaume II en ville, ou sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/50.06148/19.93774Je pense que plut&o... | |
| 42671939 by Stereo @ 2016-10-05 23:54 | 1 | 2016-10-08 14:41 | mavl ♦76,070 | Hello, Stereo. What wrong with way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372411024/history You wrote "Simplified multipolygons." Why? If something is marked as multipolygon, then it's ok. |
| 2 | 2016-10-10 20:13 | Stereo | Hello mavl,Thank you very much for your message. It's always interesting to think about mapping practice.Before my edit, there were 28 multipolygon relations, many of them consisting of only outer ways.After turning these into areas, and using big inner islands to contain groups of ... | |
| 3 | 2016-10-11 17:42 | mavl ♦76,070 | Thank you so much for your answer. «there were 28 multipolygon relations, many of them consisting of only outer ways» Maybe, the contributor has not finished work yet. I have looked the data in iD and in JOSM. It looks as in other places of a planet (as usually). If we h... | |
| 42689199 by 1r-2m @ 2016-10-06 16:25 | 1 | 2016-10-07 12:42 | Stereo | Hello, je vois que tu es très acti(f|ve) sur le cap. Bienvenue! :)Tu as vu que quand tu dessinais une forme rectangulaire, avec l’éditeur iD, tu pouvais taper S (comme Square) pour rendre tous les angles droits?Bon mapping,Guillaume |
| 42499792 by Dagou @ 2016-09-28 17:11 | 1 | 2016-09-29 16:43 | Stereo | Alors, ça marche? :) |
| 42491284 by glglgl @ 2016-09-28 11:04 | 1 | 2016-09-29 15:50 | Stereo | Hallo,In Luxemburg sind die Grenzsteine oft aber nicht immer ein Teil der Grenze, weil die Steine nicht bewegt werden wenn nachgemessen wird.Viel Spaß beim mappen,Guillaume |
| 42089196 by AtomMapper @ 2016-09-11 23:17 | 1 | 2016-09-26 11:15 | Stereo | Hi AtomMapper,Please follow the import guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines before importing data.The addresses you've mapped are just house numbers, they're not at the position where they are in the source, and you didn't discuss this with the ... |
| 41926785 by wilda69 @ 2016-09-05 10:14 | 1 | 2016-09-07 18:17 | Stereo | Hi Dan! It looks like this edit broke RGTR line 309. User VoyagesWeber says that they’ll fix it, and update the bypass when it’s opened. Hope you’re good! |
| 2 | 2016-09-07 18:39 | wilda69 ♦28 | Hi Guillaume,Yes I noticed that, and although I am very careful not to upset any existing relations, this one had no option until the "owner" resolves it. I have been conservative in the various map changes here, and over the weeks it will become more clear what can be taken as pass&eac... | |
| 41830427 by SHARCRASH @ 2016-08-31 16:17 | 1 | 2016-08-31 19:53 | Stereo | Tu essaies pas JOSM? :) |
| 2 | 2016-08-31 20:02 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Je suis passé par là aujourd'hui, j'enregistre mes observations vite fait avant que je n'oublie. :) JOSM je le laisse pour des edits où je pourrai prendre mon temps à chercher les bonnes fonctions, options, listes, etc... pour editer. | |
| 41760808 by shanefrombray @ 2016-08-28 17:38 | 1 | 2016-08-29 10:40 | Stereo | Nice micromapping, thanks! |
| 38823878 by Stereo @ 2016-04-24 00:48 | 1 | 2016-08-19 08:45 | Javier Gutiérrez ♦9 | Hi Guillaume,in this changeset (4 months ago) you have removed many of the address interpolation I have made at the beginning of the year. Now only the address-from and -to are left (E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/49.58985/6.10251)Just wanted to know if that is the result wan... |
| 2 | 2016-08-19 08:51 | Stereo | Hello Javier,Oh no! No, that was not the intended result!However, I do intend to import the open data address points, which will replace these.I'd love to chat about it if you're on whatsapp/google hangouts/iMessage/facebook/twitter - shoot me a message with your contact?Gu... | |
| 3 | 2016-08-21 17:04 | Javier Gutiérrez ♦9 | Hi Guillaume,Ok I see, the interpolations will be replaced by single address points when importing the open data.As arranged I am not adding any new addresses after our last discussion (just added one or two when updating a construction area).My skype ID is dzien_dobre (I don't use ... | |
| 41345619 by Laurent75 @ 2016-08-09 13:35 | 1 | 2016-08-09 13:42 | Stereo | Moien,Ech hun d’Donnéeë vun der Mobilitéitszentral vun data.public.lu convertéiert. Mat JOSM ass dat ganz praktesch:http://stereo.lu/stations.osmHei ass och e gutt Beispill vun enger gut gemappter Bus-Relatioun: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/63039... |
| 41102436 by Denis_Helfer @ 2016-07-29 08:10 | 1 | 2016-07-29 13:56 | Stereo | Bonjour Denis,Tu sembles faire un edit mécanique qui renomme railway=abandoned en railway:abandoned=rail.railway=abandoned est bien plus courant et traité par openrailwaymap, j'avais donc préféré celui-ci. Tu en penses quoi?Ton edit mécaniqu... |
| 2 | 2016-07-29 16:16 | Denis_Helfer ♦90 | Cela semble plus logique de respecter les recommandations du cycle de vie des objets http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix. Il faut que les rendus suivent et intègre les évolutions intelligentes des attributs. On ne tague pas pour le ... amhaédit mécanique... | |
| 3 | 2016-07-29 16:20 | Stereo | Merci pour le lien! La page parle justement de vieux rails, et, dans l'exemple, a à la fois railway=disused et disused:railway=rail. Si ça te va de combiner les deux, ça me va :) | |
| 4 | 2016-07-29 17:20 | Denis_Helfer ♦90 | let's go même si je trouve cela redondant. Il faudrait chasser les disused=yes alors ? | |
| 5 | 2016-07-29 17:23 | Stereo | D'après https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:#Updating_older_tagging oui. Mais taginfo trouve 50000 disused=yes, vaste programme! | |
| 40944016 by gcaspar @ 2016-07-22 08:16 | 1 | 2016-07-22 09:50 | Stereo | Schon! :-D |
| 2 | 2016-07-22 09:54 | gcaspar ♦7 | tirlech. war geschter mer dat kuerz ukucken. Verbesserungen sinn natierlech wellkom ;-) | |
| 40400985 by Polyglot @ 2016-06-30 19:33 | 1 | 2016-06-30 21:42 | Stereo | Thanks again :) |
| 40392882 by SHARCRASH @ 2016-06-30 14:05 | 1 | 2016-06-30 16:04 | Stereo | Please don’t delete data because you can’t see an use for it. Others might have an use for it - firefighters for example.In this case, they should have been tagged as service = driveway.Do you know how to undo a changeset? |
| 2 | 2016-06-30 22:43 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Hi! Well i really don't think that anyone will ever need a map for such tiny driveways, they are barely 20 meters long max according way size/scale, and they are directly accessible from main street or nothing suggests that the entrance from the buildings or private resid.area is somewhat h... | |
| 40193180 by Dagou @ 2016-06-21 22:41 | 1 | 2016-06-22 10:10 | Stereo | Hello Dagou, c'est cool que tu débordes de notre côté de la frontière :)Je ne sais pas si tu as vu qu'on a des orthophotos libres disponibles pour le Luxembourg? Elles devraient être dans les arrière-plans Vespucci. |
| 39539391 by 4b696d @ 2016-05-24 17:37 | 1 | 2016-05-24 18:20 | Stereo | Thanks! Would you have any ideas on how to tag the parking positions correctly? |
| 2 | 2016-05-24 18:29 | 4b696d ♦79 | I would tag them as aeroway=parking_position. I can see that you sometimes use aeroway=taxiway at the end of those parking positions. In my opinion those ways are no taxiways as they only point the way from the parking position to the real taxiway. I suppose that there is currently no better method ... | |
| 39371258 by siamak08 @ 2016-05-17 08:54 | 1 | 2016-05-17 14:02 | Stereo | Bonjour! W et E ne veulent pas dire West et East? Est-ce que le bloc du milieu a un nom? |
| 2 | 2016-05-17 14:06 | Stereo | D'après http://www.eib.org/attachments/general/livraisons_sur_le_campus_de_la_bei_en.pdf , c'était correct avant. | |
| 3 | 2016-05-17 14:58 | siamak08 ♦1 | Il y a une anomalie sur la carte, lorsqu'on zoom sur le batiment, le WKI devient EKI et EKI devient WKI !Pourriez-vous régler ce problème svp ? Merci. | |
| 4 | 2016-05-17 15:01 | Stereo | Ah, je vois, c'est les anciennes données, ça disparait pour moi en rechargeant la page. Les données affichées en ouvrant l'éditeur, en tout cas, devraient être les dernières disponibles.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51071558 est donc ... | |
| 5 | 2016-05-18 07:44 | siamak08 ♦1 | Bonjour, le problème persiste toujours, il y a vraiment des anomalies. Dans certains zoom, il est écrit EKI et EKI, dans d'autre WKI en bas et EKI en haut (c'est correcte), et d'autres cas EKI en bas et WKI en haut.A mon avis c'est un problème de cache du c... | |
| 39264850 by petz @ 2016-05-12 11:39 | 1 | 2016-05-12 13:06 | Stereo | Hi! The previous changeset that moved the station's location said "from 13/12". The aerial imagery would therefore be out of date, and, indeed, I think that the station has been moved. last December What's your source? |
| 2 | 2016-05-12 13:46 | petz ♦1 | Source? Well, the previous location was a parking space next to the car bridge over the railways. Even on the map you can see the train station building a few hundred meters to the west. I have no other source than my own knowledge that the train station is there so if I made an error, please correc... | |
| 39214410 by Frédéric Gutkin @ 2016-05-10 11:54 | 1 | 2016-05-10 12:23 | Stereo | Bonjour, bienvenue! Tu peux trouver de bien meilleures orthophotos que Bing dans l'entrée geoportail.lu du menu Imagerie. |
| 2 | 2016-05-10 15:27 | Frédéric Gutkin ♦15 | Bonjour Stereo, merci !Merci pour le tuyau, je vais dès à présent utiliser ces fonds. Puis-je utiliser les sources du geoportail sans restriction particulière ? | |
| 3 | 2016-05-11 16:18 | Stereo | Celles qui sont dans JOSM, oui, sans aucune restriction. Il y en a sur le site web qui ne sont pas dans JOSM, et celles-là, malheureusement, on ne peut pas. | |
| 39230513 by Loll78 @ 2016-05-11 00:00 | 1 | 2016-05-11 09:01 | Stereo | Welcome back :). Mir hu nei Loftbiller asw. vum Geoportal, kuck an Imagery. |
| 38915994 by WJtW @ 2016-04-27 10:31 | 1 | 2016-04-27 11:49 | Stereo | Hi! The Bing images for Luxembourg are a bit old; you should have some newer ones in the JOSM imagery menu. Happy mapping! |
| 38832485 by xXMapperXx @ 2016-04-24 12:27 | 1 | 2016-04-25 07:36 | Stereo | JOSM isn't easy, but it's worth it :). https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/2lweop/simpler_josm/ has a few good tips. |
| 38664322 by Joe Zack @ 2016-04-18 11:08 | 1 | 2016-04-19 06:42 | Stereo | Bonjour! Super, la rue de Chiny nous manquait depuis longtemps. Elle est encore en construction, non? |
| 38478877 by xXMapperXx @ 2016-04-11 15:55 | 1 | 2016-04-12 08:18 | Stereo | There's also a water layer on the inspire server that shows where all the rivers and streams go. Would you like me to configure things so you can also use it in iD? |
| 38485472 by DonKikote @ 2016-04-11 20:56 | 1 | 2016-04-12 08:06 | Stereo | Hi! So the buildings are, I assume, called East and West? What's the middle bit called? |
| 38313209 by sahnemann @ 2016-04-05 10:07 | 1 | 2016-04-05 10:29 | Stereo | Est-ce que les rails sont encore là? |
| 37606549 by SHARCRASH @ 2016-03-04 11:19 | 1 | 2016-03-31 19:27 | Stereo | Hahaha, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38189669 |
| 2 | 2016-04-01 09:57 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | ! ! ! :O Private life exposed! Hahaha! Ca te fait marrer hein! MDR! :) Satané copy/paste qui n'a pas fait son travail... | |
| 38166804 by charel-e @ 2016-03-30 13:28 | 1 | 2016-03-30 16:34 | Stereo | Congratulations on your first edits! You can also tag the street with the street name, and the houses with the house numbers. |
| 37802622 by Matlux @ 2016-03-13 16:00 | 1 | 2016-03-13 20:30 | Stereo | Hi! You tagged it with foot=no. Is it a bad idea to walk there, or is it forbidden to walk there? |
| 2 | 2016-03-14 01:28 | Matlux ♦1 | Hey Stereo, As long as it's in a village it's illegal because there's a side walk. When you're outside there are metal barriers at the sides of the road. What happens on their outer side is a very rapid drop so you'd be forced to walk on the inner side of the barriers whic... | |
| 3 | 2016-03-21 11:38 | Stereo | Then it's a very bad idea to walk there, but legal. Even the emergency exit for the Tunnel Grouft is there, and anyone potentially escaping will be on foot.There aren't many places in Luxembourg where pedestrians legally can't go - typically, motorways and tunnels. They have the s... | |
| 4 | 2016-03-21 11:38 | Stereo | Would you like to update the CR122? I can also do it for you if you want. | |
| 5 | 2016-03-23 16:10 | Stereo | Hi, I've unset the foot=no tag. Hope that's ok. Happy mapping! | |
| 37921628 by wilda69 @ 2016-03-18 15:04 | 1 | 2016-03-18 15:56 | Stereo | Yay :) |
| 2 | 2016-03-18 17:21 | wilda69 ♦28 | Its a start ;) Noticed you had plotted the police station as "local knowledge" (do hope you kept to the speed limits), but they have moved to rue de Dudelange. Could not see who was now in that building, Dan | |
| 37689826 by aarp65 @ 2016-03-08 16:15 | 1 | 2016-03-09 19:21 | Stereo | Wow. Danke für deine Mühe. |
| 37607623 by R0bst3r @ 2016-03-04 12:12 | 1 | 2016-03-04 13:44 | Stereo | Stimmt, ist besser so. Danke! |
| 37386808 by SHARCRASH @ 2016-02-23 11:52 | 1 | 2016-02-23 11:53 | Stereo | Si tu es dans le coin, cette note semble indiquer que le CR110 s'appelle Rue d'Esch au sud de l'intersection jusqu'à la frontière avec Esch?http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/514808#c1084068 |
| 2 | 2016-02-23 12:32 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Je vais vérifier, je passerai par là aujourd'hui. | |
| 37103535 by freeclimber @ 2016-02-09 15:09 | 1 | 2016-02-09 15:20 | Stereo | https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89mile_Mayrisch has his name with an É, and that's usually how Émile is spelled. |
| 2 | 2016-02-09 15:43 | freeclimber ♦2 | I changed this, because all the houses I did once in this street are now marked with errors in the OSM-Inspector.If you change the streetname, you have also to change ALL the houses ;-)About the É, we can discuss ;-)In the list of the postcodes, all capitals are without É (ht... | |
| 36975672 by Javier Gutiérrez @ 2016-02-03 12:03 | 1 | 2016-02-03 13:59 | Stereo | Hi Javier!Fantastic work on the addresses. I assume you know http://qa.poole.ch/?zoom=17&lat=49.62&lon=6.054&layers=TTFT ?Guillaume |
| 2 | 2016-02-03 17:42 | Javier Gutiérrez ♦9 | Hi Guillaume,thanks a lot. Actually I am quite new to OSM.and I did not know about the website, really very helpful, so far I was just checking blindly by missing addresses, definitely will use this link from now on..Thanks again!Javier | |
| 36903046 by jln35 @ 2016-01-30 18:15 | 1 | 2016-01-31 11:08 | Stereo | Ça sera cool quand on aura les noms de toutes les villas du cap :) |
| 36774569 by Pa413 @ 2016-01-24 11:58 | 1 | 2016-01-24 16:40 | Stereo | Hello, est-ce que tu as une source pour le changement de ref=* ? Merci! |
| 2 | 2016-01-24 17:37 | Pa413 ♦19 | Bonjour à vous,alors pour l'info depuis le 1er janvier 2011, à été crée la Métropole Nice Côte-d'Azur. Par conséquent la métropole à la charge de toute la voirie à l’intérieur de son territoire. La... | |
| 36746876 by Amodef @ 2016-01-22 19:49 | 1 | 2016-01-23 15:35 | Stereo | Hello,La définition de ville dépend du pays. Contrairement à la France, au Luxembourg, la population ne joue pas de rôle. Les villes Luxembourgeoises sont petites, mais ce sont bel et bien officiellement des villes:https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_des_villes_du_... |
| 2 | 2016-01-23 15:52 | Amodef ♦2 | Salut,Le statut légal de ville n'a, de mon point de vue, guère d'importance.Lorsque tu crées une carte régionale, avec MapBox par exemple, de gros villages / très petites villes se retrouvent au même niveau hiérarchique que de "vraie... | |
| 3 | 2016-01-23 17:37 | Stereo | Oui, ridicule, mais c'est un problème de rendu. Je pense que c'est objectivement une ville si ça en a la définition légale. Certains moteurs de rendu, utilisent le tag population=* pour choisir l'importance d'un place=* - je crois que le rendu osm-fr f... | |
| 4 | 2016-01-24 21:55 | Amodef ♦2 | Amha, les noms "hameau", "village", "ville", etc. d'OSM n'ont pas pour vocation d'exprimer une réalité légale, mais simplement de servir de repère hiérarchique.Sinon, comment distinguer légalement une "vill... | |
| 36635267 by Gunstick @ 2016-01-17 15:17 | 1 | 2016-01-17 16:17 | Stereo | Wars du rem moossen? |
| 36589510 by SHARCRASH @ 2016-01-15 11:05 | 1 | 2016-01-15 12:59 | Stereo | Hmm, but that's tagging for the renderer if the grass isn't actually hovering in the air. |
| 2 | 2016-01-15 14:15 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Yeah i know, my edit was a test for a "substitute" at one of OSM's flaws. Obviously you don't get what's at stake. If you don't know, sorry, OSM comments don't allow enough characters for a full explanation. I explained the most important in my changeset comment. | |
| 3 | 2016-01-15 14:19 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | @SHARCRASH I agree, it can be frustrating that OSM changeset comments don't allow more than 255 characters. However, you've always got the option (as soon as the changeset is closed) of adding a changeset discussion comment that extends it - you can explain all you like in there.Cheers,... | |
| 4 | 2016-01-15 21:28 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | @SomeoneElse Good idea! I will think about it for the next time. Thanks! But it's really long to explain. Stereo knows me well for the loooong communications i can write. | |
| 36402803 by Gehrke @ 2016-01-06 13:06 | 1 | 2016-01-06 13:20 | Stereo | Danke! Was war da falsch? Hatte ich dieses Stück in der Relation vergessen? |
| 2 | 2016-01-06 13:21 | Gehrke ♦27 | Ja, musste noch aus einer PLZ-Relation entfernt werden. | |
| 36074434 by Javier Gutiérrez @ 2015-12-20 21:58 | 1 | 2015-12-21 08:40 | Stereo | Wonderful work, you'll have all the addresses collected soon! |
| 2 | 2015-12-21 08:51 | Javier Gutiérrez ♦9 | Thank you! Happy to contribute with OSM, just a beginner for now.. | |
| 35714497 by rg4444 @ 2015-12-02 20:43 | 1 | 2015-12-02 21:46 | Stereo | Cool :)Du kanns d'Landuse-Polygonen och méi grouss machen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30795579 |
| 35261003 by Hartkerius @ 2015-11-12 13:23 | 1 | 2015-11-27 22:12 | Stereo | Hello! I've just mapped the garden as an area:http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35619420If you know the garden or have access to it, maybe you have the knowledge that would be necessary to add more detail. |
| 35112504 by sspan @ 2015-11-05 21:27 | 1 | 2015-11-06 15:45 | Stereo | I think you accidentally deleted a part of Grand-Rue while moving the stray node. I've fixed it for you. Happy mapping! |
| 2 | 2015-11-06 19:59 | sspan ♦1 | Thanks, haven't edited anything in a long time. | |
| 35008086 by wilda69 @ 2015-11-01 09:58 | 1 | 2015-11-01 17:57 | Stereo | Great :) |
| 2 | 2015-11-04 15:20 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review:the tag highway=demolished is rarely used.Does it mean something like highway=construction or is it more a highway=abandoned?See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway | |
| 3 | 2015-11-04 15:22 | GerdP ♦2,751 | or maybe highway=dismantled? | |
| 4 | 2015-11-04 15:50 | wilda69 ♦28 | dismantled is another tag that could be used. There is so much construction going on that very little is left. The point is that there are relations still attached to them which someone needs to update, so at the mom these nodes can not be deleted. | |
| 5 | 2015-11-04 16:16 | GerdP ♦2,751 | okay. I try to reduce the different highway tags which mean something like "no highway", see also http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/how-to-tag-a-highway-that-doesn-t-exist-tp5857111.htmlIf I got that right, most of the ways tagged demolished will not be rebuilt (at the same place), so I&... | |
| 6 | 2015-11-04 17:28 | Stereo | Hi! I have updated the relations Dan mentions, is there any reason we should still keep those demolished highways as highway=dismantled? | |
| 7 | 2015-11-04 17:35 | GerdP ♦2,751 | I prefer to remove those ways, others want to keep some kind of history in OSM,for example they build relations with names like "old interstate xyz " in the USA. | |
| 8 | 2015-11-04 18:09 | wilda69 ♦28 | Many thanks for taking care of all the relations. Difficult to judge if these roads have a historic value, but as I have not seen any plans what will happen to these after the tramcomplex has been built, it might be worth keeping them for a while. The new road looks very temporary, so there are bo... | |
| 9 | 2015-11-04 18:55 | Stereo | This is the latest I've found:http://images.newmedia.lu/rtl2008.lu/nt/p/2014/07/07/16/0740ac7672f01e8e9b3525f0bd47c948.jpeghttp://images.newmedia.lu/rtl.lu/cms/imagegallery/2014/07/07/22496//1024//f1e236d0ea2e41899e237fdab606a4ea.jpgI think we should map what we can reliably check o... | |
| 34996978 by c-l @ 2015-10-31 17:45 | 1 | 2015-10-31 19:03 | Stereo | Hallo c-l, wilkommen in Luxemburg. Im “Imagery”-Menü von JOSM müsstest du unsere Ortho 2010 und 2013 Luftbilder, die besser als die von bing sind, haben. Happy mapping! |
| 34935367 by wilda69 @ 2015-10-28 20:11 | 1 | 2015-10-28 21:42 | Stereo | Hi Dan! Is that from a survey already? |
| 2 | 2015-10-29 15:23 | wilda69 ♦28 | Hi Gerard,I was there on Monday, but it was not open yet and could not get very close. However newspaper photo suggest that the road goes parallel until the tunnel starts. Not as shown. I will investigate this on Sunday | |
| 3 | 2015-11-01 11:58 | wilda69 ♦28 | Hi Guillaume,I did a lot of plotting this morning (despite the fog), and there are some major changes in the area. Used a camera in my car to help with clues for the tunnel, and just as well as the GPS lost signal for a while. My track can be seen on OSM.1) there is a completely new temporary ... | |
| 34329656 by SHARCRASH @ 2015-09-29 16:27 | 1 | 2015-09-29 18:58 | Stereo | Tiens, pour tes fixes de polygones, tu connais osmose? http://osmose.openstreetmap.lu/fr/map/#country=luxembourg&zoom=12&lat=49.5&lon=6&item=1xxx |
| 2 | 2015-09-30 08:41 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Hello, oui je connais. :) Mais une fois que l'erreur est enregistrée, elle y reste tant que personne ne l'aura effacé d'OSMose, même si déjà corrigé entre-temps. Ca donne l'impression d'y perdre notre temps, alors OSMi m'est suff... | |
| 33531116 by Stereo @ 2015-08-23 19:09 | 1 | 2015-09-20 17:43 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Tu as une erreur d'OSMi sur les bâtiments de la BEI (Banque euro. d'inv.): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=6.13836&lat=49.62088&zoom=17&opacity=0.95&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_close... |
| 2 | 2015-09-21 03:55 | Stereo | Tu as tout à fait raison, ce n'est pas le bon type de relation. Par contre, j'ai laissé ça avec trois polygones pour les trois parties, je ne vois pas l'intérêt de multipolygones ici. | |
| 3 | 2015-09-21 08:39 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Je croyais que tu allais encore fignoler les bâtiments avec les surfaces vertes internes, sinon pas trop d'intérêt en effet. :) | |
| 34142240 by SHARCRASH @ 2015-09-20 14:59 | 1 | 2015-09-20 15:10 | Stereo | Ça doit pas être facile de jongler tous tes multipolygones avec l'éditeur iD. Tu as déjà essayé JOSM? |
| 2 | 2015-09-20 17:34 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Lorsqu'il y a beaucoup d'éléments à éditer, en effet. :) Mais dans ce cas-ci je crois qu'il s'agit d'un bug où OSMi généré n'importe quel type d'erreur lorsque 2 polygones d'un même MP se touchent s... | |
| 34006330 by jack1968 @ 2015-09-13 18:52 | 1 | 2015-09-13 22:51 | Stereo | Hi! Are you sure that's oneway? |
| 2 | 2015-09-14 17:52 | jack1968 ♦8 | Hi, it was already mapped as oneway. I modified the section to allow for bicycles in both directions. At least, that was my intention. | |
| 33269353 by p1230 @ 2015-08-11 15:00 | 1 | 2015-08-11 16:07 | Stereo | Hallo! Wieso benannt? Es ist doch schon vending=cigarettes drin, und die Automaten heissen ja nicht alle Zigarettenautomat. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only |
| 2 | 2015-09-12 16:47 | p1230 ♦10 | Hi, habe deine Nachricht erst jetzt gesehen, sorry. Automaten für den Zigarettenverkauf werden doch Zigarettenautomaten genannt, daher halte ich es für richtig, sie auch so in OSM zu "taufen". Der Grund, warum ich sie aktiv so benenne ist, dass man in OSM-Anwendungen besser danac... | |
| 3 | 2015-09-13 22:09 | Stereo | Ich würde sagen, dass die nicht so heissen, so wie eine Telefonzelle eine Telefonzelle ist aber nicht Telefonzelle heisst. Konntest du https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name lesen? | |
| 4 | 2015-09-13 22:11 | Stereo | Hall Tabakwaren wäre in deinem Fall der operator=*, und die Zigarettenautomate so zu taggen um sie in deiner Anwendung besser zu finden ist eigentlich tagging for the renderer, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer | |
| 33315478 by peter_osm @ 2015-08-13 15:29 | 1 | 2015-08-14 13:28 | Stereo | Hi Peter,It’s cool that someone is finally mapping Esch! We still have a lot of streets with no name there: http://qa.poole.ch/?layers=TTTF0B&zoom=15&lat=49.53633&lon=5.89312There's a list of the streets that are still missing in Esch at http://streetlist.openstreetmap... |
| 32914681 by drkarsti @ 2015-07-27 17:43 | 1 | 2015-07-27 23:03 | Stereo | Hi, welcome to OSM! Are these the actual names on the bus stops, and/or those used on mobiliteit.lu? |
| 2 | 2015-07-28 06:13 | drkarsti ♦1 | Hi, for "Michel Rodange" and "Etats-Unis" the names are written on a black on white sign, which is at the bus stop post. For "Ste Zithe" it is only mentioned on the schedule of the line 19, which is going there. This should be the same as on mobiliteit.lu, but I went to... | |
| 32891376 by AD06 @ 2015-07-26 15:31 | 1 | 2015-07-26 17:49 | Stereo | Tu pourrais mettre name:oc comme c’est un dialecte de l’occitan. Ça serait marrant d’avoir tous les noms de rue et de faire un plan :) |
| 32804136 by Hendrikklaas @ 2015-07-22 14:53 Active block | 1 | 2015-07-23 14:06 | Stereo | Thank you for participating in our maproulette challenge in Luxembourg! |
| 32804055 by glglgl @ 2015-07-22 14:49 | 1 | 2015-07-22 16:13 | Stereo | Thanks! |
| 32198747 by gcaspar @ 2015-06-25 07:02 | 1 | 2015-06-25 13:59 | Stereo | IIRC ass do keng vëlosspuer/cycleway, also nëmmen oneway:bicycle=no. Brauchs du dat fir déng Navigatioun? |
| 2 | 2015-06-25 15:13 | gcaspar ♦7 | aner Einbahnstroossen an der Stad dei fir den Vëlo opp sinn goufen och esou gezeechend. wäert awer sinn dat däin oneway:bicycle=no wuel duer geet | |
| 32156463 by mistermarple @ 2015-06-23 09:10 | 1 | 2015-06-23 12:16 | Stereo | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Do you know if the CR373 going into the village like this is correct? |
| 32157974 by adamos @ 2015-06-23 10:26 | 1 | 2015-06-23 12:11 | Stereo | Thank you for participating in our maproulette challenge! |
| 19855048 by Stereo @ 2014-01-07 00:04 | 1 | 2015-06-01 04:42 | naoliv ♦1,783 | Stereo, I don't understand why and what you did here: you have deleted a valid route relation and, among other things, included toll=yes in every part of the highway. |
| 2 | 2015-06-13 18:08 | Stereo | Hi Naoliv,Thank you for your comment. The route relation was wrong in many places and badly tagged; I reproduced the tags on the segments where they made sense. If you know that some segments are toll-free, the best thing to do would probably be to tag them with toll=no. | |
| 31857276 by Gunstick @ 2015-06-09 21:53 | 1 | 2015-06-10 06:49 | Stereo | Do you know about http://overpass-turbo.eu ? Its wizard at the top left is great for finding things like this; try "waterway=* and tunnel = * and tunnel!=culvert in Luxembourg”I’m not sure I really understand when tunnel=culvert should not be used on a waterway. Maybe when it fl... |
| 2 | 2015-06-11 15:49 | Gunstick ♦3 | Thanks for the link! I checked other tunnel=culvert things, and I could actually stand in them, even without getting wet feet because the stream was slow. There is no real category to make a difference between a pipe and an water underpass. There are attributes for heigth and width which can be used... | |
| 31792311 by SHARCRASH @ 2015-06-07 14:58 | 1 | 2015-06-07 21:31 | Stereo | The on-the-ground rule says that we only map what actually exists. If the building has been razed, it doesn’t belong in OSM. There are some historical maps projects, but none in Luxembourg as far as I know. |
| 2 | 2015-06-08 09:28 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Logic! Thanks Stereo! | |
| 31800478 by Peda @ 2015-06-07 21:18 | 1 | 2015-06-07 21:25 | Stereo | Cool, thank you! |
| 31319773 by Tom Ansay @ 2015-05-20 16:20 | 1 | 2015-05-20 22:16 | Stereo | Rond-point Serra is actually the name that’s both being used by the authorities, and on the ground:http://www.fondskirchberg.lu/content.php?id=92http://www.pch.public.lu/fr/actualites/chantiers-autoroutiers/2015/a1-a7-echangeur-kirchberg-jonction-gruenewald-1/index.htmlPretty much ... |
| 2 | 2015-05-21 06:54 | Tom Ansay ♦2 | OK, I will use this logic in the future, thank you. | |
| 31319977 by Tom Ansay @ 2015-05-20 16:27 | 1 | 2015-05-20 22:11 | Stereo | Moien! You can also tag the Luxembourgish names of things with the name:lb=* tag in the advanced tagging. See, for example, the Phillipsgaass nearby. |
| 2 | 2015-05-21 06:53 | Tom Ansay ♦2 | True, the Luxembourgian name is tagged as Hamilius and the name:"language code" are translations whereas "Um Aldringer" is a local name used be indigene. | |
| 31147131 by ralfherm @ 2015-05-14 16:41 | 1 | 2015-05-14 22:43 | Stereo | My bad! Thank you! |
| 30349571 by gerard heinen @ 2015-04-20 09:15 | 1 | 2015-04-20 12:52 | Stereo | Hello! (Moien?)Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see you have removed the steps to the train platform. How do people access the platform now?Happy mapping,Guillaume |
| 30160991 by wilda69 @ 2015-04-12 11:15 | 1 | 2015-04-12 12:44 | Stereo | Hi Dan! What's the luxportail kml? |
| 2 | 2015-04-12 13:23 | wilda69 ♦28 | Wow Guillaume, you are quick on this one ;)I have just posted an email to talk-lu which explains the geoportail info I received from them. | |
| 29982158 by Stereo @ 2015-04-04 21:57 | 1 | 2015-04-05 10:25 | 4rch ♦138 | Hello Stereo,as national boundaries are a sensitive case it would be great if you could inform the affected communities first before you apply big changes. What exactly are you modifying? We have a thread in the german subforum regarding international boundaries: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/vie... |
| 2 | 2015-04-05 12:34 | Stereo | Hi Arch,I've replied in the forum, and will reply more later. | |
| 29958689 by Pierreletz @ 2015-04-03 19:13 | 1 | 2015-04-03 19:24 | Stereo | Ech hun och um Stauséi geschafft, a hat e puer Konflikter. Has du Nodes vum Séi geläscht? |
| 29551842 by gcaspar @ 2015-03-17 21:52 | 1 | 2015-03-18 23:14 | Stereo | Du hues de ganze Souterrain geläscht? |
| 2 | 2015-03-19 07:12 | gcaspar ♦7 | jo deen ass elo zou, gëtt ofgerappt and geet ergo esou ni méi op. ech wäert an den nächsten Deeg hei an och Royal och d'Sidewalks an ped. crossings propper androen fir dat den Fousweerouting klappt | |
| 28928314 by rob72 @ 2015-02-18 09:58 | 1 | 2015-02-18 22:21 | Stereo | Hi! It’s actually in the direction of the way, just like oneway=yes would be. The ideal value for this tag is, of course, a percentage. Would you like to re-edit the way? |
| 2 | 2015-02-18 22:49 | rob72 ♦1 | Ok, understood. Regarding the incline percentage, there is no sign, so I have no idea. But it is enough that a few weeks ago in heavy snow I could not drive up, even with winter tires. | |
| 28164958 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2015-01-15 14:56 | 1 | 2015-01-15 23:43 | Stereo | You’re sure you don’t want to come and check with a survey? :) |
| 28121847 by Gunstick @ 2015-01-13 21:09 | 1 | 2015-01-13 23:52 | Stereo | Dat schéngt jo geklappt ze hun :D |
| 28076728 by Test360 @ 2015-01-12 00:51 | 1 | 2015-01-12 02:00 | Stereo | Hi, welcome to mapping in Luxembourg!Isn’t area=yes implied for circular ways tagged highway=services? The service stations actually have addresses with “Aire de Capellen” as the street name, how do you think we should have that information if you think the tagging of the highw... |
| 2 | 2015-01-12 04:37 | Test360 ♦9 | According to the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservices , area=yes is not implied.I'm going to "Aire de Capellen" as the street name if you think it is useful.Thanks for your comment. | |
| 3 | 2015-01-12 04:50 | Test360 ♦9 | I have add the name “Aire de Capellen” on the 6 main roads of the service area.I think that naming all the road in the service area is unnecessary. Do you agree? | |
| 27207054 by Hobgoblin @ 2014-12-03 19:21 | 1 | 2014-12-03 20:37 | Stereo | Above and beyond, thank you :) |
| 26903787 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2014-11-20 09:27 | 1 | 2014-11-20 10:16 | Stereo | Now you pretty much have to come and visit to survey the tracktype :) |