amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 participated in the following changeset discussionsamapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 123827992 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2022-07-20 00:54 | 1 | 2025-04-24 02:25 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9898588949/historyWhich building?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975671547 ? |
| 2 | 2025-04-24 07:02 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | oh I can't remember now. it was 2 years ago, | |
| 124661563 by AlaskaDave @ 2022-08-09 00:18 | 1 | 2025-02-22 11:46 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | In this changeset, way 1084947854 is tagged as `waterway=rapids`. However is that right? The wiki says a a rapid should be drawn across the river, like weir¹. I noticed this item because it causes the McKenzie River to be split on WaterwayMap.org². The source of this WWM change is this co... |
| 2 | 2025-02-24 05:25 | AlaskaDave ♦167 | Hi,I believe the tagging is correct as is but feel free to replace the line of rapids I've drawn as a way with a node if you wish.Splits in ways are very common in OSM. We do it for highways all the time, for example, whenever the speed limit changes. Dealing with such splits is a render... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-25 14:47 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I know about needing to split ways (I wrote a post-processing tool to put them back together `osm-lump-ways`) 😉What do you think about the wiki's description of rapids, compared to your use? Which of you are correct? 🙂🙂 | |
| 4 | 2025-02-25 15:30 | AlaskaDave ♦167 | I think you should change the way it's mapped. When I did this, I was under the impression that a tagging a segment of the waterway was a legitimate way to map rapids. It looks like the tagging you suggest is correct, or more correct. I may have taken my guidance from an older Wiki article, I r... | |
| 5 | 2025-02-25 15:34 | AlaskaDave ♦167 | Another thought is that in this case, and I don't recall the specifics of my decision, when a rapids has a measurable length, say 100m or whatever, then drawing a weir across the river isn't a very accurate way to represent it. My intention was possibly to somehow model these rapids that w... | |
| 6 | 2025-02-25 19:34 | quincylvania ♦54 | Hi all, avid canoe mapper here. I'm the one that updated the wiki page to discourage `waterway=rapids` as a centerline. My recommended tagging is to treat rapids as an attribute of a river and use `waterway=river` + `rapids=yes`. There are few reasons for this, but basically there are a lot of ... | |
| 7 | 2025-02-25 23:58 | AlaskaDave ♦167 | Thanks for the clarification quincylvania. I was feeling embarrassed that I had misunderstood the Wiki. My memory wasn't clear enough to recall how I made the decision to tag a segment of the river with waterway=rapids but now I understand. Interestingly, the McKenzie River relation includes th... | |
| 8 | 2025-02-27 13:52 | quincylvania ♦54 | Yep, that's my preferred approach. Though personally I would put `name=McKenzie River` and `rapids:name=Eagle Rock Rapids` on the river line. Then I would also map the rapids separately as a node with `waterway=rapids` or an area with `water=rapids`, and `name=Eagle Rock Rapids`. This conveys t... | |
| 9 | 2025-02-28 09:14 | AlaskaDave ♦167 | @quincylvaniaI updated my river tagging preset to use your scheme with rapids:name. I use the same scenario for named bridges with a bridge:name tag. Many OSM mappers change the name of the highway to the name of the bridge in such cases but that is obviously incorrect. The same logic applies here... | |
| 77394190 by mfdowney83 @ 2019-11-21 18:49 | 1 | 2024-11-27 12:02 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Here you added a tiny tiny river, called “Tom's River” <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/747887033/history/1>. Is that a real river? |
| 33990471 by cliffcake @ 2015-09-12 23:33 | 1 | 2024-11-13 09:02 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Here, you changed the `name` of a river segment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358219216) from `Clare River` to `Annagh River`.However, I'm looking at the OS 1st. Ed. (& 2nd) for Lim. & Tipp., and in all 4 that segment is named “Clare River”. The river segments aroun... |
| 157368164 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2024-10-02 08:18 | 1 | 2024-10-19 22:14 | george1201 ♦226 | Hallo Amanda,bist du sicher, dass queerKAstle das Fitnes-Center "SO Personal Training" ersetzt? Am Gebäude finde ich weiterhin Hinweise auf das Fitness-Center. An der Seite zur Wilhelm-Baur-Straße gibt es eine Eingangstür sowie einen Briefkasten mit einer entsprechenden A... |
| 2 | 2024-11-08 08:04 | george1201 ♦226 | Somit also die Frage: Gibt es "SO Personal Training" in diesem Gebäude noch? Oder hat queerKAstle dessen Räume komplett übernommen? | |
| 3 | 2024-11-11 10:31 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Ich war dort am Samstag. Du hast Recht, es gibt immer noch Schilder und Postkisten für „SO Personal Trainer“. Aber QueerKastle Staff haben mir erzählt, dass dieses Fitnesscentre in dieser Gebäude gibt, aber es zieht am endes des Jahrs aus. Am 01.01. hat QueerKastle das ges... | |
| 4 | 2024-11-11 10:33 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Ich würde es einfach lassen, aber wenn jemand will dieses Fitnesscentre für ein paar Wochen eintrage, habe ich kein Problem | |
| 5 | 2024-11-11 19:38 | george1201 ♦226 | Danke, alles klar. Wenn queerKAstle die Räume übernimmt, dann sollte man den Fitness-Center-Knoten ganz löschen, und nicht mit Lifecycle-Prefix stehen lassen (sonst nervt StreetComplete mit ständigen Nachfragen). Wenn das mit der Übernahme ab 01.01. stimmt, dann kann man die... | |
| 140192625 by mikeocool @ 2023-08-21 17:12 | 1 | 2024-09-14 11:45 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hiya! You changed the tag of the tunnel from waterway=channel → =canal.That means it won't show up on lots of the WaterwayMap.org views as not flowing water. (because canal).Since it's a tunnel isn't there other things, like pressurised which are better tags?Than... |
| 2 | 2024-09-14 14:25 | mikeocool ♦24 | Yeah — from my reading of the wiki, it seems little unclear where the difference between waterway=canal + tunnel=flooded and waterway=pressurized is, so I’m fine with either.Though I think it’s not showing on certain waterway maps layers because certain layers explicitly exclud... | |
| 153972189 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2024-07-15 13:16 | 1 | 2024-07-16 08:17 | mueschel ♦6,574 | Hi Amanda,could you check your tags? "gentive" vs "genitive". |
| 2 | 2024-07-16 12:16 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | @mueschel Thanks for spotting that! I've fixed that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154012665I had considered making a preset for “logainm based name” stuff, and this sort of simple typo is a reason to do that! | |
| 153449420 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2024-07-02 10:43 | 1 | 2024-07-02 12:16 | mcliquid ♦1,862 | Oops, changed the location too quickly ;) |
| 2 | 2024-07-03 06:51 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Oops! Every time! 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️Gods, I need to do a JOSM plugin to stop myself | |
| 3 | 2024-07-03 15:24 | mcliquid ♦1,862 | btw welcome to my neighborhood and enjoy the "Klamms" here. They are somewhat dangerous but beautiful with that amount of water currently. | |
| 150146870 by AdrianLangtry @ 2024-04-17 20:05 | 1 | 2024-04-22 08:52 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hiya! FYI I think you've created a loop in the streams. You can see loops here: <https://waterwaymap.org/loops#map=14.84/53.93014/-7.15049>. In this changeset, you added a few `waterway=stream` and that made a loop. I think it's the northern half of the loop in that link.I'm... |
| 2 | 2024-04-22 09:08 | AdrianLangtry ♦15 | Every stream in East Cavan leads to Lough Ramor eventually, I'm going to have to check this one out on the ground to figure out the directions here. This area is one of the highest elevation in Cavan too. I'll see if I can figure it out. | |
| 146798420 by ablevi202 @ 2024-01-28 23:31 | 1 | 2024-02-09 11:35 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Thanks for using my waterwaymap loop detection! You left a little double mapped stream, which caused another loop, and I've removed it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147252471It's great to see more people keeping an eye on these loops. 👍https://www.openstreetmap.or... |
| 2 | 2024-02-09 14:58 | ablevi202 ♦41 | Oh thank you for finding that! It's a little embarrassing that I managed to miss that but thanks for checking it, I'll try to be more vigilant next time. | |
| 145889690 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2024-01-04 16:45 | 1 | 2024-01-05 06:37 | Patrickov ♦103 | Please keep edits in one country at most. For this set it should be 2 changesets, one in Kenya and one in the Philippines |
| 2 | 2024-01-05 10:10 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | oh sorry! It happened again! sorry | |
| 144024303 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2023-11-14 19:50 | 1 | 2023-11-16 08:43 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | oops. Sorry for large changeset |
| 143298929 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2023-10-29 07:27 | 1 | 2023-10-29 09:22 | zstadler ♦1,055 | Hi,I'm currently monitoring vandalism. Changesets covering a large area area, such as this changeset, tend to overlap unrelated areas. They are also hard to look into, as I wrote you earlier. |
| 2 | 2023-10-29 09:34 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Sorry! Ah damn it! It happened again! That was my mistake. Sorry.last time: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143218439#map=4/40.25/16.65Do you know if I can make JOSM stop me from doing that?https://en.osm.town/deck/@amapanda/111311793968128839 | |
| 143218439 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2023-10-27 16:05 | 1 | 2023-10-27 21:29 | zstadler ♦1,055 | Hello,Please note that it is not possible to view the contents of this changeset using OSMChahttps://osmcha.org/changesets/143218439or achavihttps://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143218439&relations=trueThis is probably because it covers a large area and it was open for more th... |
| 2 | 2023-10-28 08:45 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Damn it! Sorry. 😢 I must have forgotten to upload data between data QA fixes. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-28 09:04 | zstadler ♦1,055 | No worries! | |
| 4 | 2023-10-29 12:01 | mmd ♦47 | LGTM: https://dev.overpass-api.de/cs_143218439_achavi.png | |
| 5 | 2023-10-29 12:27 | zstadler ♦1,055 | @mmd,Indeedhttps://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143218439&relations=trueworks well and fast. Please let us know when the performance improvements are also available on the Overpass production server and accessible from OSMCha. | |
| 142778230 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2023-10-18 19:24 | 1 | 2023-10-19 20:05 | AndersAndersson ♦601 | HelloWas this a misstake with the nod tagging??https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11272950402 |
| 2 | 2023-10-20 06:47 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | oops, sorry. Fixed | |
| 3 | 2023-10-20 07:09 | AndersAndersson ♦601 | Thanks! | |
| 4 | 2023-10-20 07:11 | AndersAndersson ♦601 | Just a question. How should I interpret the colors in your link? Is it coloured by length? | |
| 5 | 2023-10-20 07:15 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | No, the colours are randomly assigned. | |
| 141868196 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2023-09-28 14:52 | 1 | 2023-09-28 23:27 | muralito ♦2,022 | hi. please make changesets with smaller bounding boxes, as it makes them easier to review. thanks. |
| 2 | 2023-09-29 05:49 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Oops. Sorry. I think I forgot to upload one set of changes before doing the next step. Most of that time I'm good at doing that. | |
| 138783187 by RooneyD @ 2023-07-20 20:23 | 1 | 2023-08-06 14:04 | dónal ♦85 | Please advise why the tags name:lt\tand name:sco were removed. Thanks! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138783187 |
| 2 | 2023-08-07 16:33 | RooneyD ♦1 | Doesn't translate back to Londonderry --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138783187 | |
| 3 | 2023-09-23 09:12 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You changed the name:en_GB too. How come? | |
| 128630235 by Wozza64 @ 2022-11-08 09:02 | 1 | 2023-07-30 19:52 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. why did you make this change? if the `name` includes a “💜” then we should keep it. We shouldn't (mis)tag for the renderer (or “other systems”) . What other systems |
| 2 | 2023-07-31 13:01 | Wozza64 ♦1 | It causes problems for other systems that rely on OSM data. In my particular case the TfI journey planner (https://www.transportforireland.ie/plan-a-journey/). | |
| 3 | 2023-08-01 11:48 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I've reverted it here <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139296343> | |
| 137636721 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2023-06-22 08:38 | 1 | 2023-07-05 07:23 | user_5359 ♦19,410 | Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/520823966. What is the mean of the tag no:wikipedia = yes?It is not notable that an object does not have a wikipedia entry. |
| 2 | 2023-07-05 08:33 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Yes. I wanted to tag that this river does not have a Wikipedia entry. I am improving the tagging of rivers in Ireland, incl. adding the `wikipedia` tag. I added `no:wikipedia` to show that one should not look for a wikipedia tag.I think this `no:wikipedia` tag should only be used when one might ... | |
| 3 | 2023-07-05 12:03 | user_5359 ♦19,410 | Did you know the postfix :missing see https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=a%3Amissing#keys? | |
| 4 | 2023-07-07 09:04 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | yeah I saw that… I wasn't sure if that was better or the `no:` prefix. Do you think I should change it? | |
| 5 | 2023-07-07 11:14 | user_5359 ♦19,410 | I am already of the opinion that the real statement is that a Wikipedia entry is useful and not that it does not exist. | |
| 137505505 by manuelpicaro @ 2023-06-19 07:56 | 1 | 2023-07-06 13:07 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. You've added a lot of landuses here. But if I check the aerial, I can't see why this <https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15812548> is mapped as heath, where as this <https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15812779> is just sand. They look the same to me... Why did you m... |
| 131384580 by PolarBergPotato @ 2023-01-17 14:51 | 1 | 2023-07-03 13:26 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you added ` diet:vegan=True` here, but the proper tag is `=yes` or `=only`. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Adiet%3Avegan |
| 2 | 2023-07-03 13:32 | PolarBergPotato ♦2 | Thanks for the info, I adjusted it accordingly. | |
| 127629661 by Fabrizio Introna @ 2022-10-16 17:34 | 1 | 2023-06-29 15:21 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You've added a big, rough, duplicate river here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104478391#map=8/-1.329/-62.807I've delted it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137923262 |
| 128307304 by supsup @ 2022-10-31 16:24 | 1 | 2023-03-02 14:59 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. Here you set `access=no` to this path ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23652536#map=17/40.81932/14.43153 ). But it's a part of various hiking/walking routes, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9278345#map=16/40.8239/14.4289 which is the main route around the cone.Are you sur... |
| 2 | 2023-03-02 16:07 | supsup ♦9 | Hello, it is officially closed - you are in legal theory not supposed to be there. That is how I inderstand acces=no. In practise nothing will happen if you use it as long as you do not go all the way to the official route up (there is usually somobody watching it during opening times, but they cann... | |
| 3 | 2023-03-02 16:09 | supsup ♦9 | Even though now thinking - access no is the west part of it. I will check from a desktop, wait a few hours, please. | |
| 4 | 2023-03-02 19:31 | supsup ♦9 | Looking again, it is unfortunatelly correct as reality goes. Though if you remove the access tag, I will not revert it - it is true that it is annoying that one cannot route through it and the regulation is very lightly enforced. | |
| 5 | 2023-03-02 20:03 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Yes, `access=no` is correct for paths you're not legally allowed go on.Since this entire route is promenantly mentioned on the park website, I couldn't understand how it was closed.However the route description ( https://www.parconazionaledelvesuvio.it/en/visit-the-park/the-pat... | |
| 6 | 2023-03-02 20:09 | supsup ♦9 | Yeah, the PDF is old, I think the situation has been like this for several years, it is a pity, these trails are beautiful (but as I said, I walked this trail and I was not alone that day). | |
| 126499971 by ❤️🔥 @ 2022-09-22 10:59 | 1 | 2023-01-18 12:28 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! I noticed you added a `gay=yes` venue (Wingate Club) in this changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607729719 ). You may prefer to use the `lgbtq=primary` tag instead https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lgbtq which is clearer (IMO) than `gay` tag.There's also a Telegram chat ... |
| 2 | 2023-01-18 18:15 | ❤️🔥 ♦367 | sure, I'll change the tags. https://wiki.osm.org/Key:gay was the first result in google and it wasn't obvious from that wiki page that's there's a better tag | |
| 127434203 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2022-10-12 20:08 | 1 | 2022-10-13 00:26 | A67-A67 ♦932 | Hi, This seems to be a mechanical edit in multiple countries. Have you contacted the local OSM communities in those countries?Why wouldn't an accuracy higher than 10 cm be allowed? You've simplified buildings in the Netherlands that were imported from the BAG register. These buildi... |
| 2 | 2022-10-13 16:24 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | apologies for the overeager attempt. I've reverted all that changeset now, and I'll be more careful in future. | |
| 3 | 2022-10-13 19:15 | A67-A67 ♦932 | Thank you! | |
| 68024655 by majkaz @ 2019-03-11 14:32 | 1 | 2022-10-12 11:00 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I think you added too many tiny areas (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676033622 ) |
| 126031011 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2022-09-10 21:55 | 1 | 2022-10-10 10:39 | VictorIE ♦911 | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093457469Lots of double-mapped houses. |
| 2 | 2022-10-11 16:20 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | thanks. fixed. | |
| 70906686 by Christian Bohn @ 2019-06-04 03:35 | 1 | 2022-09-21 12:33 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | ... are you sure about this... |
| 74200941 by mr12*4-1 @ 2019-09-07 09:08 | 1 | 2022-06-01 07:50 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You've added a lot of shops with the name `name=local shop |
| 2 | 2022-06-01 07:50 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6779015311#map=19/-6.16787/39.20686Is that correct? If not can you update the `name` tag please | |
| 121518285 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2022-05-26 11:14 | 1 | 2022-06-01 06:55 | user_5359 ♦19,410 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9772401039/history. What ist the meaning of the tag name:absent=yes? Did you mean noname=yes (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key%3Anoname)? |
| 2 | 2022-06-01 07:04 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | oops yeah `noname=yes` would be similar. I like the general case of `X:absent=yes` hence why I thought that was what it was | |
| 3 | 2022-06-01 07:22 | user_5359 ♦19,410 | The key name:absent collides with the principle of language notation. Moreover, the key noname is documented in the wiki and is much more common. | |
| 4 | 2022-06-01 07:35 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | you can change it to noname=yes if you want | |
| 67264342 by Xre90 @ 2019-02-16 21:54 | 1 | 2022-06-01 04:56 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hallo. Hier du hast Café 59 als `gay=yes` getaggt ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125172515#map=16/48.7619/11.4315 ). Ist es eine LGBTQ+ Venue? Wenn ja, ich glaube `lgbtq=primary` ist besser als `gay=yes` |
| 115505126 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2021-12-29 08:20 | 1 | 2021-12-30 19:57 | Lee Carré ♦665 | “according_to”Ooh, thanks for the hint. There's a disputed border near me, and I wasn't aware of these keys. Perfect. |
| 2 | 2021-12-30 20:05 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | It's only a new tagging scheme (cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ClaimedBorders ). I am working on a data consumer for this scheme | |
| 3 | 2021-12-30 20:19 | Lee Carré ♦665 | 👍 | |
| 4 | 2021-12-30 20:31 | kakiremora ♦103 | Interesting choice of editor fot this task.Does this tagging schema imply that there would be multiple versions of one country in the database? Wouldn't it be better to create some kind of relation with parts that are recognised/ not recognise? Or at least, connect the two versions in one r... | |
| 5 | 2022-01-01 19:53 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | level0 was just the easiest do make this change.Yes, in my scheme there would be many partially overlapping areas. Yes, this has downsides. However one big upside is the simplicity for the data model, and widespread support for this way of mapping areas in most OSM tools. | |
| 6 | 2022-01-14 13:18 | G1asshouse ♦44 | Please, please, please help me understand how your proposal is significantly different than the solidly rejected and much more flushed out Mapping disputed boundaries proposal? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mapping_disputed_boundariesPlease, please, please walk me to the ... | |
| 7 | 2022-01-14 13:33 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Just a quick, partial reply: This tagging that I've added has nothing to do with my work at Geofabrik (and nothing to do with any OSMF work). This is just something in my spare time that I started playing with over the christmas holiday break.Yes, I'm aware that national borders are se... | |
| 8 | 2022-01-14 18:01 | G1asshouse ♦44 | I take you at your word that this was not employment related for any 3rd party. In that regard, I’d like to apologize to you. I do not wish to impugn your character or that of the company you work for. Not as a defense but simply as an explanation. I clearly inferred incorrectly a potential mo... | |
| 115001453 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2021-12-16 10:38 | 1 | 2021-12-21 13:46 | mueschel ♦6,574 | Hi,'artifical' soll wohl 'artificial' heißen?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1012732598 |
| 2 | 2021-12-22 09:47 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Ach ja! Danke. Ich hab es repariert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115245335 | |
| 3 | 2021-12-23 08:39 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Und was bitte bedeutet artificial ? | |
| 4 | 2021-12-23 11:00 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | ein moderneres, geschlechtesneutrales alternativ zu “man made”. Ich hab beides eingetragen. 🙂 | |
| 5 | 2021-12-24 07:30 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Gibt es dazu ein Proposal? | |
| 6 | 2021-12-24 10:43 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | für `artificial`? Noch nicht. | |
| 7 | 2021-12-27 07:44 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Bitte führe hier nicht einfach neue Schlüssel ein sondern starte vorher Proposal.Danke | |
| 83951800 by rene78 @ 2020-04-22 16:22 | 1 | 2021-12-19 12:04 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I notice you added `gay=yes` to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4951306621 I've changed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115123455 to be `lgbtq=primary` because that's a better tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lgbtq 🙂 |
| 114577340 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2021-12-05 10:44 | 1 | 2021-12-05 16:52 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo Amanda,warum änderst Duwaterway=riverbankinnatural=water +water=riverab ? |
| 2 | 2021-12-05 17:06 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hallo. Weil `natural=water` besser ist. Es ist Wasser, d.h. `natural=water` ist korrekt. (und es ist auch ein Fluß, d.h. `water=river`). Mit diese Tagging-schema, alle wasser fläche sind mit `natural=water` getagged.Du kannst mehr über diese mapping Projekt lesen: https://wiki.op... | |
| 3 | 2021-12-05 17:10 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Sorry, die verlinkte Seite ist nur auf Englisch, was ich nicht ausreichend verstehe. | |
| 4 | 2021-12-05 17:20 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Es gibt hier ein Paar diskussionen:https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=843823https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=70078 | |
| 114550260 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2021-12-04 10:34 | 1 | 2021-12-04 11:24 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Please read this Amanda:https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donauversinkung |
| 2 | 2021-12-04 11:28 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Es tut mir leid. Ich hab ein Fehler gemacht. ich habe es zuruckgesetzthttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114551665 | |
| 113869948 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2021-11-16 21:15 | 1 | 2021-11-17 07:21 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo,warum verbindest Du 2 Gebäude, die gar nicht verbunden sind?Änderung zurückgesetzt.Grüße |
| 2 | 2021-11-17 07:41 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Entschultigung, es sieht so in Bing aus, dass sie zusammen verbindet. | |
| 3 | 2021-11-17 07:46 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo,ein Tipp dazu:In Baden-Württemberg, Deutschland, steht uns die amtliche Karte Maps4BW als Hintergrund zur Verfügung, von der wir legal abzeichnen dürfen.Schaue es Dir mal an.Grüße | |
| 55396341 by azsr @ 2018-01-13 00:44 | 1 | 2021-10-28 15:03 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Did you make a mistake with objects like this:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5335947010#map=19/41.64499/-71.46341 |
| 49413864 by Niru Pradhan @ 2017-06-10 06:57 | 1 | 2021-10-28 15:02 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | you don't need to add `key=value` 😉 |
| 44095507 by Jennifer Baumann @ 2016-12-01 19:51 | 1 | 2021-10-28 09:20 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | hi, you don't need to ad such advertisments in OSM |
| 111625355 by Random Points @ 2021-09-24 03:05 | 1 | 2021-10-16 08:12 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you added `shop=primary` to this node ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3759828395 ), but you had previously tagged it as a a bar (`amenity=bar`). Is this one place *really* a bar *and* a convience store? Both? |
| 2 | 2021-10-16 09:52 | Random Points ♦8 | Hi,The OMaps client does not show the additional fields after updating shop name and POI type. The POI has been cleaned manually in rev 112571792. | |
| 79031400 by Car Doctor @ 2019-12-30 21:24 | 1 | 2021-09-17 07:15 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | sorry is this real? I see nothign on the aerial imagery, and this looks like spam.I have deleted it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111322632 |
| 110877044 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2021-09-07 19:40 | 1 | 2021-09-08 22:33 | giggls ♦104 | Are you sure about the name?Puhberg is likely Puberg like the village nearby.Searching the Web I found "Camping Aire Naturelle De Hinsbourg" but not Website. |
| 2 | 2021-09-08 22:39 | giggls ♦104 | Also found the name "LE STEINBERG"https://www.campingfrance.com/de/suchen-sie-ihren-campingplatz/grosser-osten/bas-rhin/hinsbourg/le-steinberg | |
| 3 | 2021-09-09 06:45 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | huh. I cannot remember why I changed the name. I presume there was a sign at the reception office.... | |
| 87049262 by CourtneyJackson1 @ 2020-06-23 19:46 | 1 | 2021-08-16 14:33 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello, you added a lot of "viewpoints" here. What's going on? Are those really view points? Did you just want the numbers to show up? If these are not view points, then we should delete these. |
| 100000001 by MikeN @ 2021-02-25 19:29 | 1 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | mappinglander ♦99 | 100,000,001th changeset! Congratulations! |
| 2 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | LorenzoStucchi ♦129 | Congrats!!🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 3 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | Kovoschiz ♦2,543 | You are the 1st! | |
| 4 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | so close! 🤣 | |
| 5 | 2021-02-25 19:35 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | Congrats on the 100,000,000th changeset!!!(Changeset 0 doesn't exist anyway) | |
| 6 | 2021-02-25 19:40 | श्र ♦4 | nice! | |
| 7 | 2021-02-25 19:47 | mvexel ♦144 | You're the one ringing in a new era, congrats. | |
| 8 | 2021-02-26 05:23 | Magick93 ♦35 | Gratz! | |
| 9 | 2021-02-27 01:46 | Particlem ♦1 | Also came here to show some love to the 100M+1 changeset! | |
| 100000000 by Lamine Ndiaye @ 2021-02-25 19:29 | 1 | 2021-02-25 19:29 | FinB2000 ♦13 | Congratulations on getting changeset 100,000,000! |
| 2 | 2021-02-25 19:29 | tungster ♦7 | 100 MILLION LET'S F****** GOOOOOOOOOO | |
| 3 | 2021-02-25 19:29 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Congratulations! | |
| 4 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | ycool ♦4 | YES! | |
| 5 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | mneko ♦9 | lucky changeset! | |
| 6 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | ottwiz ♦385 | Congratulations! | |
| 7 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | mDav ♦6 | YAHOOOOO!!!!!!!! <3 <3 Viva La OSM! | |
| 8 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Stereo ♦359 | Félicitation pour le 100 millionième changement sur OpenStreetMap!! | |
| 9 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Incredible! Here's to 100 million more. | |
| 10 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Palolo ♦457 | Good job | |
| 11 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦712 | Congratulations! | |
| 12 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Enock4seth ♦548 | Whoopiii!! | |
| 13 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | syntex ♦829 | Congratulations! | |
| 14 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | fghj753 ♦53 | 100000000 !!! | |
| 15 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | VLD085 ♦2 | Awesome!!!!!!! | |
| 16 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | JriSv250 ♦31 | Congratulations! You managed to do the 100,000,000 changeset! | |
| 17 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Robot8A ♦69 | 🎉 | |
| 18 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Mannivu ♦215 | Changeset #100,000,000, congratulations! | |
| 19 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | overflorian ♦49 | Wonderfull changeset ! Congrat | |
| 20 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Kachkaev ♦23 | 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉GO OSM!!!🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 21 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Domkot_UA Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 22 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | don-vip ♦11 | Congratulations!!! | |
| 23 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Michael Montani ♦5 | Congratulations Lamine! Thank you for the Wolof lesson before :) | |
| 24 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Steve ♦1 | woo! | |
| 25 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | GeoMechain ♦26 | Congratulations !! | |
| 26 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | LorenzoStucchi ♦129 | 🎉🎉🎉 congrats!! | |
| 27 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | Kovoschiz ♦2,543 | Oh god this is going to be the most changeset comment ever | |
| 28 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | cafeconleche ♦19 | Congratulations! | |
| 29 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | BubbaJuice ♦125 | 🎉 | |
| 30 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | freeExec ♦628 | 0/ | |
| 31 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | sandeman_13 ♦2 | 100M :D | |
| 32 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | ToniE ♦1,233 | You've got it! Congrats! | |
| 33 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | Kateregga1 ♦17 | Congratulations Lamine!!!! | |
| 34 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | rouelibre1 ♦5 | Wohooooooooooooooooooooooo! Bravo !!! C'est génial ! | |
| 35 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | FinB2000 ♦13 | I think this changeset has the WORLD RECORD for the most comments! | |
| 36 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | Johnny Mapperseed ♦99 | Congratulations! - And thanks for mapping Senegal! | |
| 37 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | gendy54 ♦584 | Félicitations. En plus un contributeur francophone ! | |
| 38 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | LivingWithDragons ♦52 | Well done, and if you're not aware you can claim a prize for making the 100 millionth changeset in OSM. Contact the people that run WeeklyOSM. | |
| 39 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | Sammyhawkrad ♦87 | Congratulations!!! | |
| 40 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | kkowalsky ♦1 | !!!!!! 100,000,000 !!!!!!! | |
| 41 | 2021-02-25 19:34 | Immaculate Mwanja ♦1 | 💃💃💃yesss! 100M | |
| 42 | 2021-02-25 19:34 | dmlu ♦164 | Félicitations!🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 43 | 2021-02-25 19:34 | Friendly_Ghost ♦636 | Congrats on mapping changeset 100,000,000 !!! | |
| 44 | 2021-02-25 19:35 | Dawid2849 ♦712 | Congrats! | |
| 45 | 2021-02-25 19:35 | Julian S ♦4 | Amazing, congrats, and congrats to the whole OSM community for this amazing and weird thing we've built! :) | |
| 46 | 2021-02-25 19:35 | *Martin* ♦641 | Congrats!https://www.facebook.com/FreemapSlovakia/posts/3864774783568639 | |
| 47 | 2021-02-25 19:36 | osmer120311 ♦14 | You did it! Congrats! OSM FOREVER!!! | |
| 48 | 2021-02-25 19:36 | Mxdanger ♦77 | This is quite the achievement. | |
| 49 | 2021-02-25 19:36 | Laura Mugeha ♦4 | 🙌🏿🙌🏿🙌🏿 | |
| 50 | 2021-02-25 19:37 | Bexhill-OSM ♦95 | 👍🏻 nice | |
| 51 | 2021-02-25 19:37 | Darrell ♦5 | Congratulations! ✊ | |
| 52 | 2021-02-25 19:38 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Congratulations! | |
| 53 | 2021-02-25 19:38 | MAPconcierge ♦6 | Congratulations!!!!!!!! :-) | |
| 54 | 2021-02-25 19:39 | श्र ♦4 | Yay! Congrats! | |
| 55 | 2021-02-25 19:41 | Ndangane ♦3 | Félicitations !Un contributeur Sénégalais à l’honneur. J'espère qu'il sera reçu par Macky Sall.Et c'est un petit village de brousse nommé Nianiane qui lui a porté bonheur.Congratulations ! | |
| 56 | 2021-02-25 19:42 | Mashin ♦562 | First! .. oh man not again :(Congratz! | |
| 57 | 2021-02-25 19:42 | Jrachi ♦769 | Evviva! 1000000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | |
| 58 | 2021-02-25 19:44 | Ben Abelshausen ♦14 | Yay! Senegal for the win! :) | |
| 59 | 2021-02-25 19:45 | CharliePlett ♦20 | Congrats on the 100 mil! | |
| 60 | 2021-02-25 19:45 | geoJenn ♦8 | Congratulations!!! 🎉🥳 | |
| 61 | 2021-02-25 19:48 | UNGSC-isoipsa ♦5 | Congratulations!!!🎉 | |
| 62 | 2021-02-25 19:50 | BASHIZI CIKURU Christian ♦1 | Congratulations😃 | |
| 63 | 2021-02-25 19:51 | E de Wit ♦231 | Lets pay respect to his inbox exploding. :)Also congratulations to the whole community on getting to 100 mil edits. May there be many more. | |
| 64 | 2021-02-25 19:52 | puzzled ♦1 | Congratulations to you and the Senegal :D | |
| 65 | 2021-02-25 19:53 | CapitaineMoustache ♦44 | Congratulations!🎉Félicitations Lamine ! Le Sénégal en fête !Contactez l'équipe de WeeklyOSM pour recevoir votre prix ! | |
| 66 | 2021-02-25 19:57 | Negreheb ♦263 | I looked at your blog post and want to thank you for the work you are doing in afrika! I compared this region with google and its amazing to see OSM is way better than Google. All the best from austria! | |
| 67 | 2021-02-25 20:04 | HeyItsAdam ♦41 | Very nice | |
| 68 | 2021-02-25 20:08 | annofgreenlake ♦1 | Go Senegal! | |
| 69 | 2021-02-25 20:13 | mikelmaron ♦34 | https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2021/02/25/100-million-edits-to-openstreetmap/ congrats Lamine! | |
| 70 | 2021-02-25 20:14 | KuoLLK ♦21 | Good！！ | |
| 71 | 2021-02-25 20:21 | yopaseopor ♦68 | Felicitats des de la Comunitat Catalana d'Openstreetmap. Congratulations!! | |
| 72 | 2021-02-25 20:26 | ikiya ♦27 | Congratulations!100,000,000 changesets ! | |
| 73 | 2021-02-25 20:27 | AKE Amazan ♦1 | Félicitations 🎉🎉 | |
| 74 | 2021-02-25 20:35 | EnumMapper ♦50 | Congrats🎉 | |
| 75 | 2021-02-25 20:40 | Buck Shockley ♦2 | Congratulations on getting the 100 millionth edit | |
| 76 | 2021-02-25 20:53 | hocu ♦75 | Congratulations! What a great milestone 🎉 | |
| 77 | 2021-02-25 20:57 | omniss ♦1 | 🎉Time to get a lotery ticket :-) | |
| 78 | 2021-02-25 20:57 | Eddie Burke ♦1 | We did it OSM, we saved mapping | |
| 79 | 2021-02-25 20:57 | zaizone ♦63 | Félicitations Lamine pour ce cent-millionième changeset ! Je crois que tu as gagné un petit quelque-chose ! --> http://weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/14294 | |
| 80 | 2021-02-25 21:06 | trial ♦870 | Bonjour, ça fait plaisir à voir. Et regardez la carte que beaucoup prétendent de référence : pas un chemin pour y aller. J'ai l'impression que ce changeset est l'occasion d'améliorer encore le coin ;-) : les tuiles évoluent bien. | |
| 81 | 2021-02-25 22:35 | Reino Baptista ♦93 | Félicitations Lamine,Also congratulations to all OpenStreetMap organisation! | |
| 82 | 2021-02-25 22:52 | S-zation ♦108 | Le cent millionième changeset 🎉 | |
| 83 | 2021-02-25 22:58 | SierraIm ♦6 | 🎊🎊🎊 | |
| 84 | 2021-02-25 23:13 | Farras ♦55 | Congratulations! 🎉 | |
| 85 | 2021-02-25 23:43 | Leo1590 ♦15 | Congrats!!!! | |
| 86 | 2021-02-25 23:45 | ortho_is_hot ♦252 | Congratulations 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 87 | 2021-02-25 23:57 | Kingtin ♦2 | Congrats | |
| 88 | 2021-02-26 00:47 | heimweh17 ♦1 | congratulations!!! | |
| 89 | 2021-02-26 00:55 | Adiatma IRM-RV ♦109 | Congratulations Lamine Ndiaye! 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉Happy to have you in 100 million changeset.Just in case you don't know (https://weeklyosm.eu/archives/14294) | |
| 90 | 2021-02-26 01:44 | ◪ Jarv ♦240 | 100 Million! WOOOO!!! | |
| 91 | 2021-02-26 02:19 | Nearby0051 ♦152 | Congrats! | |
| 92 | 2021-02-26 03:06 | Creeps_ ♦4 | Bien joué mon pote ! | |
| 93 | 2021-02-26 03:10 | Miftah IRM-ED ♦16 | congratulations! | |
| 94 | 2021-02-26 03:48 | DP24PH ♦418 | From DP24 in the Philippines, congrats to the 100M changeset! | |
| 95 | 2021-02-26 04:01 | booktiger ♦56 | Congratulations from the Chinese mapper！ | |
| 96 | 2021-02-26 05:06 | Magick93 ♦35 | Lucky Changeset number. GET! | |
| 97 | 2021-02-26 05:38 | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦514 | Congratulations ！You get the exact No.100000000 changeset！Good luck！ | |
| 98 | 2021-02-26 06:53 | AlexRiabtsev ♦46 | Congrats from Ukraine! | |
| 99 | 2021-02-26 07:24 | Lejun ♦482 | 🎉🎉🎉That’s our boy !🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 100 | 2021-02-26 08:06 | Nesim ♦50 | Congratulations | |
| 101 | 2021-02-26 08:16 | schwukas ♦52 | I'm glad someone so important to the community created this very special changeset! :) | |
| 102 | 2021-02-26 08:20 | ionut_radu ♦2 | Congrats from Cluj, Romania !!! Let's go for 1 billionth changeset! | |
| 103 | 2021-02-26 08:33 | GartenStuhl ♦103 | Congrats from Switzerland also :) | |
| 104 | 2021-02-26 09:57 | tux67 ♦1,940 | And congratulations from Germany .. great job - let's map the world together! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100000000 | |
| 105 | 2021-02-26 11:01 | WakefieldMapper ♦28 | Congrats from the UK! 🎉🎉 | |
| 106 | 2021-02-26 11:14 | JackNUMBER ♦10 | Congrats from France! 🙌 | |
| 107 | 2021-02-26 11:40 | Paul Berry ♦124 | Congratulations on making the 100 millionth changeset! | |
| 108 | 2021-02-26 11:47 | berndw ♦591 | !!!!!!!!!!! | |
| 109 | 2021-02-26 12:21 | stragu ♦25 | Bravo Lamine ! Merci pour tes contributions :) | |
| 110 | 2021-02-26 13:50 | Kuritsyn Roman ♦57 | 100 000 000!!!Congratulations!!! | |
| 111 | 2021-02-27 00:33 | salve100 ♦32 | 100M WOOOOO! | |
| 112 | 2021-02-27 10:11 | NM$L ♦83 | Congratulations from China! | |
| 113 | 2021-02-27 10:52 | edvac ♦221 | Félicitations, Lamine! Nianiane est maintenant une ville de renommée au niveau mondiale. J'espère un jour aller là pour visiter le village !! | |
| 114 | 2021-02-27 12:59 | kaartense ♦15 | 100 million!!! Congratulations!!! | |
| 115 | 2021-03-02 00:29 | Silva1989 ♦64 | Congrats! | |
| 116 | 2021-03-10 18:30 | AhmadHB ♦7 | Wow 100,000,000 Changeset | |
| 117 | 2021-03-15 15:23 | osm-mapping ♦24 | AWESOME CHANGESET | |
| 118 | 2021-03-24 20:57 | sdoorex ♦3 | Congrats on change 100M! | |
| 119 | 2021-04-02 03:27 | DawsZed ♦18 | Congrats on changeset 100M, with love from the United States!!! 🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 120 | 2021-04-05 21:40 | AlexMorpurgo ♦2 | Nice | |
| 121 | 2021-04-10 21:35 | rareanimal ♦1 | gg | |
| 122 | 2021-07-29 23:44 | Kento Kei ♦22 | Nice | |
| 123 | 2021-09-25 19:24 | Mason1007 ♦7 | ;) | |
| 124 | 2021-11-05 22:28 | conifermapper ♦58 | 100 MIL BOIIIIS!! | |
| 125 | 2022-07-24 05:38 | Nonichase ♦9 | Congratulations from China! | |
| 126 | 2023-01-17 17:44 | Enderbyte99 ♦14 | Your timing is epic!100 MILLION CHANGESETS | |
| 127 | 2023-03-29 10:03 | CactiStaccingCrane ♦60 | Nice | |
| 128 | 2023-04-13 18:54 | I-76 ♦38 | amazing it has more comments than #1 | |
| 129 | 2023-06-13 09:13 | Aphroditelita ♦18 | 100M lfg senegal! | |
| 130 | 2023-11-05 02:39 | Lamine Ndiaye ♦3 | thanks all | |
| 131 | 2024-02-23 14:42 | Road–Runner ♦221 | Awesome! | |
| 132 | 2025-02-16 18:49 | HugoC01 ♦33 | Congrats from France | |
| 133 | 2025-02-16 19:00 | HugoC01 ♦33 | 123 messages sur le 1 Millionième changesets.Un record ? | |
| 87557076 by Radboss @ 2020-07-05 14:36 | 1 | 2020-11-23 11:05 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. What's the source of these changes? I went there recently, and yes there seems to be what look like 2 bomb craters there. 🙂I think there's 2 more beside ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7685073894 ), the western on you have added here. |
| 2 | 2020-11-24 21:16 | Radboss ♦18 | The source was a personal survey some time ago. I wasn't sure first if the physical structure or the (potential) cause of the "sink" should be mapped – and decided then that the more semantic approach would be a better fit. Do you think something should be changed the way it is ... | |
| 3 | 2020-11-24 21:41 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You're right that there are what _look like_ bomb craters there. I wondered if they were "officially" bomb craters | |
| 4 | 2020-11-24 22:07 | Radboss ♦18 | I guess we would need something like historic aerial views for validation. For the allotments north of the rails, I have once seen a map with a layer showing identified bomb craters. I don't think this data is freely available. In general, the relative proximity to the rails might be an indicat... | |
| 5 | 2020-11-24 22:12 | Radboss ♦18 | I added a "fixme" to indicate the uncertainty. So someone with the proper source or experience can verify. | |
| 6 | 2020-11-25 17:32 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | This is the bomb craters just to the north of the rail track on the currently being demolished allotments.https://web3.karlsruhe.de/Gemeinderat/ris/ris-bi/getfile.php?id=608965&type=dohttps://www.ka-news.de/region/karlsruhe/stadtentwicklung./Gelaende-an-der-Stuttgarter-Strasse-voller-Kampfmi... | |
| 7 | 2020-11-25 17:34 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Someone's web page on it, with a photo of Node: 7685073893 I think. It's just someone's guesshttp://www.peter-hartleb.de/Exkursionen/Karlsruhe/Oberwald.html | |
| 8 | 2020-11-25 17:38 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Stadtwiki has stuffhttps://ka.stadtwiki.net/Datei:Oberwald_Bombenkrater_20130909-120614.hk.jpg | |
| 9 | 2020-12-08 23:00 | Radboss ♦18 | Thanks for the additional research! Some of the sources I had seen before, however the Stadtwiki photo was new to me. I added a respective node. | |
| 10 | 2020-12-09 08:50 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You added it based on the lat/lon from the photo, yes? We'll need a survey! 🙂 | |
| 11 | 2020-12-10 22:39 | Radboss ♦18 | We sure do! :-) I'll add a note to draw my attention into the woods... ;-) | |
| 12 | 2021-01-01 14:53 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I surveyed the large one south of Erlauchsee here ( Crater: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8207700470 OSM Change: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95753197 ), found another one beside it | |
| 13 | 2021-01-01 17:17 | Radboss ♦18 | Interesting, thanks for the update! Do you know of a detailed relief map of this area which might provide additional hints for related places? | |
| 14 | 2021-01-01 18:29 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I don't know of any, and I don't think it would help a lot because of the trees. However, LIDAR might work and go through trees, if that's available. | |
| 93920225 by siddhaam @ 2020-11-11 10:44 | 1 | 2020-11-20 18:44 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Are you sure about this change? The history of this way implies that it's supposed to be a weird one-way ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140896671/history ). Be careful not to blindly trust QA tools.The world is usually weirder than most software tools presume. 🙂 |
| 2 | 2020-11-23 05:58 | siddhaam ♦8 | Hi,Thanks for your inputs, we have reverted the edit based on your inputs and notes added to the segment under changeset(94611591). Always happy to learn from community. Regards,siddhaam | |
| 92149316 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2020-10-08 06:40 | 1 | 2020-10-08 11:37 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Hi,website and various other contact tags do not match the new name. Did you forget to remove or update them?Best regardsMichael --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92149316 |
| 2 | 2020-10-09 12:55 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | upgedated https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92239224 | |
| 84210958 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2020-04-27 16:43 | 1 | 2020-08-23 22:34 | VictorIE ♦911 | What does true=A mean?This house https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700296748 and the one next to it. |
| 2 | 2020-08-25 17:54 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Oh wow, I dunno. I must have made a mistake somehow.i've cleaned that up here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89928663 | |
| 73218100 by nathanwright120 @ 2019-08-10 10:48 | 1 | 2020-08-20 15:03 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | https://www.kotaku.com.au/2020/08/microsoft-flight-simulator-added-a-giant-monolith-to-melbourne/ 🤣 |
| 2 | 2020-08-20 16:07 | Discostu36 ♦207 | Congratulations for becoming famous by accident 👍 | |
| 3 | 2020-08-20 16:14 | S-zation ♦108 | The 212 floor Melbourne Monolith was way 712475718 | |
| 4 | 2020-08-20 20:59 | stephankn ♦321 | problem still visible in bing maps: https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=a70eec59-f17b-4f79-805a-517b8faa9bb7&cp=-37.714705~144.965212&lvl=19&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027also way 712592055 suffered from the same problem. | |
| 5 | 2020-08-20 21:01 | stephankn ♦321 | way 712591996 with 1233 floors nearby is also impressive. | |
| 6 | 2025-05-20 10:21 | CasGroenigen ♦43 | Never forget https://www.theregister.com/2020/08/20/flight_simulator_bing_fawkner_tower/ | |
| 89154782 by Tilisha Poudel @ 2020-08-09 13:52 | 1 | 2020-08-10 14:33 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You put an untaggged node at 0° 0°.... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7798499642#map=19/-0.00037/0.00020&layers=DThat's not right |
| 87619773 by Georgos20 @ 2020-07-06 21:17 | 1 | 2020-08-06 12:15 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hallo, Für `outdoor_seating` (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7689306956 ), „yes“ is korrekt, und „Ja“ ist falsch 😉 |
| 88891549 by Ger Walsh @ 2020-08-03 19:07 | 1 | 2020-08-05 13:46 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. You've duplicated a few amenities, e.g. you added `amenity=restaurant` to this building ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829797055 ), while there's an `amenity=restaurant` node inside it ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6049853007#map=19/52.35348/-7.69867 ). |
| 25907949 by DD1GJ @ 2014-10-06 22:55 | 1 | 2020-06-26 13:07 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Danke für deine Änderung. `name` war ja falsche hier. Aber nicht vergessen, es gibt ein paar `name:en` auch. 🙂 Mann soll sie auch löschen. Ich hab ein paar hier ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3113390437/history ) repairiert. |
| 26993724 by Conormap @ 2014-11-24 11:24 | 1 | 2020-04-30 07:57 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | This is a very weird & long pitch?!? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157329760I can see 'goals' at either end, but what the hell is it? |
| 36279463 by kitsis @ 2015-12-31 10:17 | 1 | 2020-04-26 19:34 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. You put this as a `highway=path` ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388842615#map=17/53.75407/-6.29174 ), but I think it's more of a proper track. I've changed it |
| 82831482 by ratrun @ 2020-03-30 15:19 | 1 | 2020-04-09 15:42 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | FYI I tried to engage the paid mapper who added some of these https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82721841#map=12/-5.0633/38.9482 |
| 82721841 by Zaina Rashidi ImportAccount @ 2020-03-27 15:28 | 1 | 2020-03-30 12:51 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, You've made some weird changes here which I don't understand.How come you mapped tihs ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785117489 ) as a residential? Likewise ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785117491 ).How come you didn't connect these 2 ways ( https://www.openstree... |
| 2 | 2020-04-09 14:27 | zainah ♦1 | Hello, I have tried to look at those roads you have said and I didn't see the roads nor the changes you have said. @Rory McCann | |
| 3 | 2020-04-09 15:41 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82831482 because someone has cleaned it up.Here in OSM we are careful to connect things | |
| 82588766 by jrose_aph @ 2020-03-24 20:31 | 1 | 2020-03-24 22:45 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello. There are a number fictional languages such as the Na'vi (Avatar), Barsoomian (John Carter), Dothraki (Game of Thrones), etc. As these are fictional languages developed from works of science fiction/fantasy, they have no place in OSM. Will you please remove the fictional names you'v... |
| 2 | 2020-03-24 23:52 | PerplexingPenguins ♦55 | Is there an official policy for that? | |
| 3 | 2020-03-25 06:51 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiabilityhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability | |
| 4 | 2020-03-25 14:49 | chachafish ♦462 | In my opinion, and using common sense, adding fictional data based on a fictional language that is the lingua franca of a fictional race of people from a fictional planet is not a good practice. | |
| 5 | 2020-03-25 15:36 | PerplexingPenguins ♦55 | I don't think it's fair to call a usable language and its words "fictional".It doesn't seem like it would be much less verifiable than most other translations | |
| 6 | 2020-03-25 18:05 | chachafish ♦462 | Hmmm, well, okay. Star Trek is fiction, science fiction to be exact. The alien characters (Vulcans, Bajorans, Romulans, Andorians, etc) are all fictional. All of the starships are fictional. The United Federation of Planets is fictional. The alien cultures are fictional. But, apparently it's no... | |
| 7 | 2020-03-25 20:47 | woodpeck ♦2,430 | Please see discussion on tagging list. | |
| 8 | 2020-03-26 05:36 | skquinn ♦804 | This is just as bad as the pollution of note=* and description=* with ad copy, if not worse. I'm glad to see it was reverted. | |
| 22128675 by gwatts88 @ 2014-05-04 16:06 | 1 | 2020-02-21 15:31 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Are you sure the name of this place is "Fish & Chips"? I've added the `cuisine=fish_and_chips`https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2836055671 |
| 26094505 by Daithí Ó Coinnigh @ 2014-10-15 12:59 | 1 | 2020-02-20 11:28 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Is this ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172067772 ) really have a name "Chipper"? I've added the `cuisine=fish_and_chips` which is the proper way to tag that |
| 50270802 by Oscailt @ 2017-07-14 00:23 | 1 | 2020-02-12 17:35 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Did you mean to move this public toilet into the corner of this house?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3750529753 |
| 67200984 by John Stanworth @ 2019-02-14 17:04 | 1 | 2020-02-04 13:39 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Is the name of this place really "Fish & chips"? You can put `cuisine=fish_and_chips` to describe what sort of place it is, but the name bit should be a name |
| 42508186 by Mingfang Wu @ 2016-09-29 01:53 | 1 | 2020-02-02 16:21 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I don't think the name of this cafe is "amenity=cafe" 😉 I've changed it here. If I'm wrong, please put it backhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80440170 |
| 79669680 by fomalhaut @ 2020-01-16 23:33 | 1 | 2020-01-18 09:35 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, I don't think you need RapiD for this change, right? Can you please use regular iD, because then it makes it easier for the community to review RapiD changes? |
| 2 | 2020-01-18 12:09 | fomalhaut ♦2 | Hi Rory. Sure, I will do it next time.That might be not the best place to ask, but do you know why there are rendered duplicate numbers on building and if we can somehow prevent it? Given that particular building, we have two 11s near each other since we have of course the same 'addr:housen... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-18 12:44 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | The number 11 is displayed twice because it is in the OSM database twice. First as a node ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2586613723) and then the house has that number too ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764025962 ).I suggest deleting the node, and leaving the housenumber on the house | |
| 79669645 by fomalhaut @ 2020-01-16 23:30 | 1 | 2020-01-18 09:36 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, I don't think you need RapiD for this change, right? Can you please use regular iD, because then it makes it easier for the community to review RapiD changes? |
| 2 | 2020-01-18 11:25 | fomalhaut ♦2 | Hi there :) Thanks for the feedback. I was checking RapiD editor since it obviously allows us to see i.e. missing roads in the area that can be added alongside other edits.I will try to use iD editor next time for such edits. Out of curiosity, is there any website, tool, or group (besides FB emp... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-18 12:43 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I don't think FB employees check RapiD edits. You can search for recent edits with OSMCha https://osmcha.mapbox.com/OSM's strength is that the community provides quality assurances and checks the data. So we're all doing it out of "self interest". I'm sure other peo... | |
| 79663532 by mdp553 @ 2020-01-16 19:38 | 1 | 2020-01-18 09:36 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, I don't think you need RapiD for this change, right? Can you please use regular iD, because then it makes it easier for the community to review RapiD changes? |
| 79667720 by OLLCommander @ 2020-01-16 22:03 | 1 | 2020-01-18 09:36 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, I don't think you need RapiD for this change, right? Can you please use regular iD, because then it makes it easier for the community to review RapiD changes? |
| 79612113 by j0hnj0nes @ 2020-01-15 15:12 | 1 | 2020-01-18 09:23 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, please don't use RapiD for this sort of change if you don't need to use the detected roads. It clogs up the list of edits to review, and makes more work for the community review team. Regular iD is better, because |
| 2 | 2020-01-19 12:14 | j0hnj0nes ♦2 | ok thanks | |
| 79629353 by JohnDoe23 @ 2020-01-16 03:02 | 1 | 2020-01-17 12:55 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hallo. Bist du sicher? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763514589#map=18/48.77984/12.98008 |
| 79655087 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2020-01-16 14:39 | 1 | 2020-01-16 15:07 | atomwaffen Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2020-01-16 15:14 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | There is nothing wrong with my editor. I have made an extension to do thishttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%E1%9A%9B%E1%9A%8F%E1%9A%92%E1%9A%90%E1%9A%94%E1%9A%8F%E1%9A%94%E1%9A%8B%E1%9A%9C%20%F0%9F%8F%B3%EF%B8%8F%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8C%88/diary/42551 | |
| 79250924 by Reino Baptista @ 2020-01-06 13:47 | 1 | 2020-01-06 14:56 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. Are you familiar with this area? I've looked at some of the tracks that you've added, and from the Bing & ESRI, they certainly look like linear features, but RapiD can be be very eager, and guess tracks too much. Are you familiar with this area, and can you confirm those are tracks... |
| 2 | 2020-01-06 16:32 | Reino Baptista ♦93 | Hi. I'm a native of Portugal so I'm able to recognize tracks on this part of the country. In this area, with few arborization, I think that the RapidID is not guessing too much. That's just an opinion. I don't understand what you mean by "trusting RapiD entirely?".`... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-07 13:41 | topolusitania ♦219 | HiRapiD can be very dangerous.In Alentejo it can make a lot of errors, all roads must be carefully examined.I ve sent to RB a private message about this area, were wire fence + plowed zone against fires, were confused by RapiD as roads. | |
| 4 | 2020-01-07 14:35 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | @Reino Thanks for your response. Please don't add `source=digitalglobe` to objects, the tag should ideally be on the changeset, not the object, but importantly, you shouldn't mislead other mappers about the source. if RapiD can't change that, then don't use it.@toplusitania T... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-07 21:40 | topolusitania ♦219 | From my experience with RapiD I would say that is a usefull tool that must be used checking every sugested road against diferent satelitte photos at diferent time of the year. | |
| 6 | 2020-01-08 10:37 | Reino Baptista ♦93 | Rory and TopoLusitânia,I read carefully all your comments and took notice.I'm willing to give RapiD a chance.I have adopted a new method: after adding with RapiD no more then 10 to 20 features, and always on a nearby area, I stop. Then I edit the same area with JOSM browsing e... | |
| 79225481 by DDeL @ 2020-01-05 23:02 | 1 | 2020-01-06 12:30 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you have added `source=digitialglobe` here to the objects, are but your changeset says otherwise. What was the source? |
| 79226394 by David Metcalfe @ 2020-01-06 00:26 | 1 | 2020-01-06 12:17 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hiya. How come you're using RapiD for these tasks? I think regular iD would be better. You don't need Facebook's computer vision import data.By using RapiD you make it harder for the community to monitor the FB data additions, please don't use it if not needed |
| 2 | 2020-01-06 20:26 | David Metcalfe ♦2 | Hi there. I appreciate the feedback, but you mistakenly assume that I'm performing changes specific to the MapRoulette tasks and nothing else while using RapiD.Using RapiD allows me to see anything that might be missing in the area alongside the MapRoulette task, and I can add those while c... | |
| 79218022 by Reino Baptista @ 2020-01-05 17:19 | 1 | 2020-01-06 12:15 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Careful withy RapiD data! It's data quality isn't great. You've got a track going through a building here. |
| 2 | 2020-01-06 16:51 | Reino Baptista ♦93 | Sorry I couldn't found it. Can you be specify please?RB | |
| 79209439 by Cord @ 2020-01-05 10:49 | 1 | 2020-01-05 11:25 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hallo. Warum benutz du RapiD? Falls man bracht keine Facebook/AI daten, denn normales iD ist besser. |
| 79189453 by zorae @ 2020-01-04 13:54 | 1 | 2020-01-04 16:04 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there. :) Are you sure about this? You have one of the tracks intersecting a water feature, and which is along side a conveyor belt. RapiD has problems with linear features. Are you sure this is right?As a quick fix, I've undone ithttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79192891 |
| 79187202 by rlp839 @ 2020-01-04 12:18 | 1 | 2020-01-04 13:34 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hallo, Du hast `source=digitalglobe` eingetragen ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760736230 ), aber das Quelle ist Maxar, oder? Ist `source=digitalglobe` rightig? |
| 2 | 2020-01-04 13:37 | rlp839 ♦10 | Ja, genau steht auch so im Changeset Kommentar. Das Feld "soruce" is ausgegraut, ich kann den Eintrag weder ändern noch löschen. | |
| 79184395 by vince50hk @ 2020-01-04 09:55 | 1 | 2020-01-04 13:29 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, careful with RapiD. If you're adding things you can improve the road geom, like this road ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134741195 ) |
| 79147643 by shiftee @ 2020-01-03 09:06 | 1 | 2020-01-04 13:20 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I notice you used RapiD here, but I don't think you actually used any of the Facebook provided computer vision data? If so, it would be better to use regular iD. We need to keep an eye on RapiD edits, so if you don't need to use it, it's better to not be flagged. |
| 2 | 2020-01-05 21:45 | shiftee ♦11 | Will do. I wanted to try it out but couldn't see any difference. Does the feature work in Ireland? | |
| 79159144 by Reino Baptista @ 2020-01-03 14:12 | 1 | 2020-01-04 13:17 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Careful about using RapiD! You've added some roads which go through hedges & the like here.I've fixed it up here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79188422 |
| 2 | 2020-01-05 16:06 | Reino Baptista ♦93 | Sorry about that.Any mishap were unintentional.RB | |
| 78545495 by UE_Su @ 2019-12-17 20:54 | 1 | 2020-01-02 13:50 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hallo, Warum nutzt du RapiD? Warum nicht normales iD? |
| 2 | 2020-01-03 11:48 | UE_Su ♦12 | Hallo,RapiD war von vorneherein so eingestellt bei Maproulette. Habe es nicht extra umgestellt. Ist das nicht fast dasselbe wie iD? | |
| 3 | 2020-01-03 17:24 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Jein. Normales iD ist besser als RapiD. RapiD hat viele daten-import-features, es ist nur für Facebook imports. | |
| 78372567 by mfbehrens @ 2019-12-13 12:33 | 1 | 2020-01-01 19:59 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Careful about using RapiD! |
| 78941151 by mfbehrens @ 2019-12-27 20:42 | 1 | 2020-01-01 19:59 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Are you _sure_ you should be adding local, personal data like that? That doesn't sound like a real name for a house |
| 2 | 2020-01-02 10:29 | mfbehrens ♦19 | Yes I am sure. This is the name of that House | |
| 72277785 by Drilon Zubaku @ 2019-07-15 18:47 | 1 | 2019-11-27 15:04 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Here you changed the name of the beach to "Restaurant Vera", and I don't think that's right for the whole beach. I've removed it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77639099 |
| 56408573 by Lopez2016 @ 2018-02-16 09:56 | 1 | 2019-11-26 14:17 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there. Here you added `name=Field` to many fields. In OSM you don't need to add such names if they are just a description. Then `landuse=farmland` is enough. 😊 I removed some of them in this changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77580556#map=15/-29.6429/27.2471 ) |
| 36965692 by Canyonsrcool @ 2016-02-02 20:35 | 1 | 2019-11-14 10:43 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You added `gay=yes` to a restaurant ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3190690061 ). How does that work? From their website they seem to be pretty regular. I thought ``gay=yes` was for gay bars & the like?(BTW I'm slowly upgrading all to `lgbtq=primary` which is a better tag) |
| 2 | 2019-11-14 15:05 | Canyonsrcool ♦53 | I did not add that tag. You can review the history of a feature to see who added it. It was added here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26830921 | |
| 3 | 2019-11-14 15:08 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You're right, my mistake! 🙂 | |
| 4 | 2019-11-14 15:14 | Canyonsrcool ♦53 | No problem | |
| 20228691 by SvenjaOMS @ 2014-01-27 13:13 | 1 | 2019-11-14 10:59 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello. Here you added the `website` tag to the thign which already has a `contact:website` tag. It's not good to have two tags which duplicate the same data, so I removed it here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77067370 ) |
| 65763541 by Edward @ 2018-12-25 16:18 | 1 | 2019-11-11 09:31 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You added a wikidata tag to this pub ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/244002338 )? That seems... strange, are you sure it's right? |
| 2 | 2019-11-11 09:39 | Edward ♦26 | I added the wikidata tag to the pub when it was called the King's Cross. At the time the name in OSM matched the title in Wikidata. The pub has since been renamed. | |
| 3 | 2019-11-11 09:43 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Is the wikidata tag still valid? The wikidata item ( https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q13129402 ) refers to a listed building. Should the building, not the pub, get the tag instead? | |
| 76464767 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2019-10-31 19:14 | 1 | 2019-11-01 06:23 | ftcat ♦209 | Hi I have been slowly working my way down the rivers in this area. Takes some time as the area is very flat and rivers have many bends in them. They also run in what we call dambos in this part of the world. A dambo is a general term for a seasonal wetland and in the dry season can be a dry grasslan... |
| 2 | 2019-11-01 06:32 | ftcat ♦209 | Further to this all rivers in Zambia can be classified as seasonal as we have only 2 real seasons a wet from November to March and dry from April to October although peak flows in the Zambezi are usually April May, something to consider if you intend visiting the Victoria Falls. some rivers I would ... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-01 08:18 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Thanks for your feedback. I've added a fixme to the rough rivers I add like this, and sometimes go back and improve the geometry later ( e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75564471#map=12/-14.2093/20.2708 ). Adding 'rough' data is better than none IMO.It's been 10+ ... | |
| 46834029 by dieterdreist @ 2017-03-14 09:03 | 1 | 2019-10-16 12:46 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, For Finnegan Irish Pub, I added `theme=irish`, to say that it's an irish pub. Although I've never heard of the `restaurant:type:it` tag, that's interestinghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75778594 |
| 2 | 2019-10-17 16:12 | dieterdreist ♦842 | we have been meeting there with our local group, but frankly I did not pay attention whether they are Irish or British. Judging by the name, if they were British, it would be a perfect cover up. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-17 16:14 | dieterdreist ♦842 | the restaurant:type:it is an old idea of mine to distinguish common local typologies of places where you can get something to eat. E.g. it is suitable to distinguish an osteria from a ristorante or a trattoria. It is a list of autodeclared (by the owner of the feature / the signage) typologies. | |
| 4 | 2019-10-17 16:16 | dieterdreist ♦842 | and it uses the words they use themselves (i.e. local language), semicolon separated, and without capitalization and spaces become underscores (i.e. there is some normalization, but very few, not changing words) | |
| 5 | 2019-10-18 07:53 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Gotcha. 🙂 It sounds like a good idea. Apparently there's some form of Italian restaurant certification http://www.italiantaste-certification.com/criteria/ | |
| 6 | 2019-10-18 10:54 | dieterdreist ♦842 | It's not something I have heard of in Italy, it is probably not so important here, because Italians will want to decide for themselves whether a restaurant is "truly Italian", but it could help tourists or in other countries. As a first indication: if there are "Spaghetti Bolog... | |
| 68862054 by Dan 9 @ 2019-04-04 00:48 | 1 | 2019-10-15 13:46 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi again. Similar to St Patrick's I've updated the tags for "The Harp". I put `theme=irish` etc.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/327226173#map=19/44.42558/26.10333https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75724316 |
| 67911265 by Dan 9 @ 2019-03-08 06:27 | 1 | 2019-10-15 13:45 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, for St Patrick Irish pub I added the `theme=irish` which is a good way to do irish pubs. I changed it from `amenity=restaurant` back to `amenity=pub`, cause the photos & name make it look more pub like, than restaurant. I also cleaned up the `cuisine` to just be `pub`. Do you have any though... |
| 32248836 by LizBennett @ 2015-06-27 18:56 | 1 | 2019-10-15 09:41 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. I've added a `theme=irish` to “Saints & Sinners”. I also changed the `cuisine` to `pub`, rather than `Irish pub`.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75709357 |
| 41204054 by kseger67 @ 2016-08-02 22:40 | 1 | 2019-10-15 09:24 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello. I've tweaked Paddy Murphy's Pub to use the `theme=irish` tag (and changed `cuisine=Irish pub` to just `cuisine=pub`).https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75708559 |
| 34354073 by cfv5015 @ 2015-09-30 19:15 | 1 | 2019-10-15 09:14 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I've changed `cusine=Irish pub` to `cuisine=pub`, since it's what I'd describe as “pub grub” and added `theme=irish` to mark that it's an “irish” p̶u̶b̶ restaurant.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75707995 |
| 25522342 by rvenancio @ 2014-09-18 14:48 | 1 | 2019-10-15 09:01 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello. For Irish &co I have changed cusine=Irish pub to use theme=irish, which is more common. I changed the cusine to “pub” since from looking at the menu it loos like thathttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75707349#map=19/38.70040/-9.17671 |
| 51063209 by roschitom @ 2017-08-12 17:04 | 1 | 2019-10-15 06:44 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hallo. Ich habe die Tags für Molly Malone's upgegraded, zu theme=irishhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75700022 |
| 2 | 2019-10-15 08:39 | roschitom ♦57 | Vielen Dank. | |
| 45099330 by shenanigansin @ 2017-01-12 09:45 | 1 | 2019-10-15 06:29 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Thanks for your contribution. I've added the `theme=irish` for irish pubs |
| 40795835 by ndm @ 2016-07-17 11:06 | 1 | 2019-10-15 06:26 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. You added `irish=yes` as a tag to the irish pub https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431512698#map=19/51.45379/-2.59323 ( Seamus O'Donnell's ). I've changed that to `theme=irish` |
| 46528497 by Andrew Carnell @ 2017-03-02 17:51 | 1 | 2019-09-18 14:40 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. Careful about adding `building` tags to the corners of the building. You've correctly added the `building=yes` tag to the actual areas/ways/polygons, you don't need them on the corners too. Thanks. |
| 37345069 by Chintu @ 2016-02-21 11:47 | 1 | 2019-09-18 14:39 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! best way to tag a school is with `amenity=school`, not just the `building=school` tag |
| 64784189 by Sammyhawkrad @ 2018-11-22 14:18 | 1 | 2019-09-10 14:20 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | For this road ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/646002848#map=19/33.06952/-4.27385 ) you fixed the typo with `smoothness`, but you didn't change the value which was `verry_bad`, and that's incorrect. 😉 |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 14:27 | Sammyhawkrad ♦87 | So you have corrected that. Thanks!. I might not have looked at that one | |
| 53788251 by marqmapper @ 2017-11-15 01:08 | 1 | 2019-08-16 10:19 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I think these rivers go the other way, I've changed the directions |
| 53788268 by translucentmessi @ 2017-11-15 01:10 | 1 | 2019-08-16 09:21 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | kind of a square and weird wetland. 🙂 It's not wrong, but maybe do you wanna spruce it up to make it more “natural”? |
| 49126421 by dMoriarty @ 2017-05-31 07:40 | 1 | 2019-07-18 09:21 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello, You updated the name of the restaurant “Da Hong Pao” (it was “1409 Playbill Cafe”). You left the `gay=yes` and `fixme=maybe closed?` tag.Are you _sure_ this is still a LGBTQ venue? The website ( http://www.dahongpaorestaurant.com/ ) makes it look like a regular non... |
| 44035875 by Chris_Pakenham @ 2016-11-29 14:38 | 1 | 2019-07-15 14:05 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you edited a really long fence ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456598779 ) that looks very strange to me, i can't see anything in the Bing aerial and the frence as mapped goes in a dead straight line.Are you sure that's correct? |
| 47719707 by DANIE BLAZE @ 2017-04-12 23:03 | 1 | 2019-07-15 14:04 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you edited a really long fence ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456598779 ) that looks very strange to me, i can't see anything in the Bing aerial and the frence as mapped goes in a dead straight line.Are you sure that's correct? |
| 48423819 by molly johnston1754 @ 2017-05-05 11:17 | 1 | 2019-04-30 13:24 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, You added a lot of empty areas here (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491585506/history ). Can you update what they are? |
| 45909542 by sbeedigital @ 2017-02-08 08:54 | 1 | 2019-04-30 12:34 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you've added a few buildings here with "name" (like name=police station https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421862834 ). It's better to add that as a specific feature in iD, rather tahn the name |
| 46615303 by bonolo @ 2017-03-06 07:36 | 1 | 2019-04-30 11:57 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there, thanks for the contributions.Careful with the tagging, you need to put a type. And careful with "mini-roundabouts" 😁https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478786186 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4719844782 |
| 50359540 by HeisenbergR @ 2017-07-17 18:42 | 1 | 2019-04-30 08:36 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | This looks like a mechanical edit! You changed the `ele` tag of many culverts to a `height` tag. (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338049308 ). But the correct tag (instead of `ele`) is `layer`!Please try to be careful. There is great benefit to actually _looking_ at the data before changi... |
| 36053224 by Fifi1984 @ 2015-12-19 19:47 | 1 | 2019-04-26 12:36 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You added a lot of `leisure=park` but on nodes. It's best to draw an area for them. 🙂 |
| 43786792 by katecronin @ 2016-11-19 01:41 | 1 | 2019-04-26 11:59 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Careful of the building mapping here! 😁 |
| 48666487 by AE35 @ 2017-05-14 07:36 | 1 | 2019-04-26 11:58 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | This looks like a mechanical edit. 😉 If you look at the individual data directly you can sometimes see other mistakes that need correcting. Like this "building" which is mapped as as a square power line ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454413597/history ). 😉 |
| 61071657 by claireeeee @ 2018-07-26 01:08 | 1 | 2019-04-26 09:17 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Careful about overlapping roads here. 🙂 |
| 52137125 by manobby @ 2017-09-18 08:56 | 1 | 2019-04-25 11:19 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You've mapped a few trees in this change and added a teeny little way to each one (e.g. v1 of this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525560134/history ) |
| 43770969 by fidgitzu spinner @ 2016-11-18 15:46 | 1 | 2019-04-25 10:15 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | `leisure=park` should be on an area, not a node |
| 43770928 by fidgitzu spinner @ 2016-11-18 15:46 | 1 | 2019-04-25 10:15 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You added a few untagged nodes here... |
| 50454238 by manobby @ 2017-07-21 10:08 | 1 | 2019-04-25 09:27 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You added a lots of untagged nodes in this changeset.... |
| 48959044 by GeoFrizz @ 2017-05-24 22:13 | 1 | 2019-04-24 09:23 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, in this changeset you have changed a lot of `building=house` to `building=yes` (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454858555/history ). Can you explain why you did that? `building=yes` is _less_ accurate than `building=house`. What makes you think these are not houses? |
| 66337913 by OneEyedBanshee @ 2019-01-15 17:20 | 1 | 2019-02-27 14:48 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello. You added a "service" road right into the scout den ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/663555985 ). you marked it as `motor_vehicle=yes`, i.e. that one can drive a car along that little stretch. That seems weird to me, is that right? |
| 47795335 by Norma_O'Connor @ 2017-04-14 20:33 | 1 | 2017-04-24 14:19 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hello, Just wanted to let you know that you've inadvertently placed "Way: Buildings (486821331)" on top of existing buildings, or something went wrong. Also that area way has self intersections to the outline. Regards |
| 2 | 2017-05-15 16:33 | Norma_O'Connor ♦1 | Hello, Thank U for your comment : ) Camden Fort Meagher is a Classical Costal Artillery Fortification dating form the 16th Century, currently a Tourist Attraction. I was trying to capture the changes, modifications and additions to the buildings and site throughout it's long history includin... | |
| 3 | 2019-02-27 09:14 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello again! It's great that you want to add historic features to OSM. But we should really try to tag them properly.. | |
| 51597990 by Ido Marom @ 2017-08-31 00:54 | 1 | 2019-02-22 11:40 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello. You added Indenpendence Way here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520151921#map=16/10.5208/7.4398 ), is there any reason why the way/road beside it ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520151922#map=16/10.5209/7.4397 ) doesn't have a name? |
| 67054150 by Mickael S @ 2019-02-09 16:58 | 1 | 2019-02-11 16:38 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | That monument seems a little large, does it really go into the canal? Mapillary implies it's much smaller. |
| 2 | 2019-02-13 07:26 | Jan Westerhof ♦35 | Yes, the triangle in the canal is correct | |
| 41575574 by TheJMcK @ 2016-08-20 12:27 | 1 | 2019-01-30 15:07 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Are you sure this is a camp site? In the middle of Dublin?! |
| 2 | 2019-01-30 23:39 | TheJMcK ♦1 | This is a scout hall (Den) | |
| 3 | 2019-01-31 08:42 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | That's what I figured. I changed it to `club=scout` which I think is the correct way to mark such a thing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4358905692https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66773832https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:club%3Dscout | |
| 66423353 by O-A-G-S @ 2019-01-18 11:30 | 1 | 2019-01-18 12:02 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I'm sorry, what? This isn't a HOT mapping task? What's going on? |
| 66394139 by Clashmore Kinsalebeg Community Council @ 2019-01-17 12:27 | 1 | 2019-01-17 13:55 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Welcom to OSM! You asked for a review, so here it is.This looks good. You've connected the footpath to the road correctly, and added extra details about the path (dirt).Did you know about the "bird hide" tag ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dbird_hide ) Perha... |
| 26718907 by Edmondmaher @ 2014-11-11 18:43 | 1 | 2019-01-13 14:47 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Someone is saying this Crosscannon Cemeteryhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1647150#c3469129 |
| 65598267 by Autarch @ 2018-12-19 02:46 | 1 | 2019-01-11 13:36 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | FYI, you don't need to put "Source=DigitalGlobe" on objects. The changeset can have the source. |
| 65494149 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2018-12-15 08:49 | 1 | 2018-12-16 14:00 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Whoops, this commit message got mixed up with the next edit ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65494149 ), The commit message for this should be: "Update, from survey, selling of christmas trees" |
| 65494628 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2018-12-15 09:22 | 1 | 2018-12-16 03:52 | Google Dispatch ♦1 | What's this? |
| 2 | 2018-12-16 14:00 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Whoops, this commit message got mixed up with my previous edit ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65494149 ), The commit message for this should be: "Added lgbtq tags to things with gay tag based on common sense, and online research of their websites" | |
| 65296511 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2018-12-08 16:59 | 1 | 2018-12-08 18:24 | ma-rt-in ♦1,752 | Hello,what is the purpose of your change? What should the "lgbtq = primary" mean. |
| 2 | 2018-12-08 18:24 | kartonage ♦987 | Hey rorym 🏳️🌈,can you explain what the diffence between lgbtq=primary and 🏳️🌈=primary is?Best regards | |
| 3 | 2018-12-08 18:27 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I have put some documentation for lgbtq tag here ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lgbtq ).The 🏳️🌈=primary tag is for fun, since it can be more inclusive than "LGBTQ". Right now there is no difference, except that the OSM Wiki doesn't let you document a key li... | |
| 4 | 2018-12-08 21:56 | LeifRasmussen ♦88 | I think that emoji are more fun, but they can also break existing programs that are expecting plain text. | |
| 5 | 2018-12-09 03:40 | Carnildo ♦905 | Even Unicode-aware programs can fail to handle emoji correctly, since they're combining characters outside the Basic Multilingual Plane. JOSM on Linux shows the tag as a black-and-white scribble, while viewing a dump of the changeset in a text editor shows the scribble plus a black-and-white f... | |
| 6 | 2018-12-09 10:09 | Nmxosm ♦343 | I can't see, why you should add redundant data. From computer science perspective it brings lots of issues along (especially consistency). What, if lgbtq=primary doesn't apply any more, a mapper removes that, but leaves [rainbow flag]=primary? Although for almost all of us OSM is a spareti... | |
| 7 | 2018-12-09 10:23 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I'm not aware of any software that this has broken, if there is, please let me know. That would be a serious matter.If your software expects ASCII text, you're not going to be able to work with lots of OSM data. 🙂 Lots of text looks like "black squiggles" to me (yes includ... | |
| 8 | 2018-12-09 10:34 | Nmxosm ♦343 | You're right. These are other problems. But just because bigger problems do exist, smaller problems still should be solved if this can be done easily. In OSM the mass of data is that vast anyway that we can't fix everything (my assumption). | |
| 9 | 2018-12-09 11:36 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hi Rory,Sorry to be "emojiist" here, but I can think of plenty of things that won't work with that as a "character" (or indeed _any_ emoji as a character). Many things that prepare data in XML format for Garmin devices, for a start. If you're entering data that many... | |
| 10 | 2018-12-09 12:11 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Oh that would be a shame. I've never generated Garmin files. What happens when you do it with characters/tags like that? I'm surprised it hasn't caused a problem yet considering how big & global OSM is already. | |
| 11 | 2018-12-09 13:53 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Garmin's XML processing is notoriously flaky. What tends to happen is it just says that the file is invalid.It's a bigger issue than Garmin though - I've no idea what the changeset source tag on this change is supposed to mean (looking at the data I can see that you've just do... | |
| 12 | 2018-12-11 21:10 | Aleks-Berlin ♦482 | please revert this change, because it is problematic for many tools.there is a good reason why you can find it here:https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/reports/characters_in_keys#problemI think OSM is a database, no funny looking text book. Your tag is the only emoji-key in the whole database!... | |
| 13 | 2018-12-11 21:15 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hi Rory,Do any more people need to jump in before you revert this?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 14 | 2018-12-11 21:20 | Aleks-Berlin ♦482 | I have seen many issues last years with problem-keys or problem-values. E.g. the char 0x7F (a char that is meant to be ignored, to delete what was there, needed in historic times) is interpreted different in OSM tools: some ignore it (as intended), some handle it as an invisinle char without size, s... | |
| 15 | 2018-12-12 08:19 | Aleks-Berlin ♦482 | Firefox under Ubuntu) can show the symbol fine, but Google-Chrome under Windows-7 does only show rectangles. try 2 OSM links (examples),www.openstreetmap.org/way/633453943taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/%F0%9F%8F%B3%EF%B8%8F%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8C%88 | |
| 16 | 2018-12-12 10:47 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I did some analysis of current tags, there are almost 100 million non Basic Multilingual Plane characters already in OSM tags.I'm curious what software will barf on this, and not other non-ASCII characters. What sort of errors do we see? Can we fix that software?One complaint is about d... | |
| 17 | 2018-12-12 12:09 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | > I'm curious what software will barf on this, I've already given an example of this.> Can we fix that software?No. See above. The only "fix" is to remove the offending data. That's what I've done when I'm extracting notes and fixmes from OSM f... | |
| 18 | 2018-12-12 14:28 | Aleks-Berlin ♦482 | Hi rorym, please separate between key and value (key=value). For keys I cannot find any special symbol-sign. Only for some values. And keys are more problematic, see also taginfo for this.Thanks, Alex | |
| 19 | 2018-12-12 21:07 | Carnildo ♦905 | On the subject of software not displaying things properly, I'm currently 0 for 9 on web browsers showing this changeset discussion as intended (Seamonkey on Gentoo Linux comes close, but the flag more closely resembles that of the Netherlands than the intended rainbow flag). Email clients are ... | |
| 20 | 2018-12-20 15:48 | Nmxosm ♦343 | Hi rorym, do you plan to just wait for this to be forgotten? There are a lot of things now presented as broken and there hasn't been any reaction on that yet.GreetingsNmxosm | |
| 21 | 2018-12-20 16:14 | LeifRasmussen ♦88 | The Overpass Turbo Query Wizard does not handle emoji. Reverting might be hard. We would really like you to revert this edit - it is not part of the OSM community culture to revert other contributors intentional edits.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Brc4VFihJ0MxROzQkU78QhZ41xBnC0hM/view?usp=sha... | |
| 22 | 2018-12-20 17:43 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | I can handle the revert if necessary. When doing reverts on behalf of the DWG I'd normally wait a week or so before doing reverts; this changeset has had that time and more and the consensus is pretty clear that it needs to be reverted, unfortunately. | |
| 23 | 2018-12-23 19:13 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Looks like this got reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65667895 . | |
| 65311145 by DaCor @ 2018-12-09 10:31 | 1 | 2018-12-10 14:07 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | 😉Cleaned up |
| 9563282 by Creando @ 2011-10-15 12:57 | 1 | 2018-11-29 09:43 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hallo, du hast "gay=yes" für Bel Ami eingetagget. Ist das richtig? Ein schwules Restaurant? |
| 2 | 2018-12-03 06:22 | Creando ♦5 | Nein, ein normales Restaurant von einem schwulem Paar betrieben mit hohem Anteil schwulen Publikums, daher nach alter Definition nicht gay=only. | |
| 64198672 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2018-11-05 13:51 | 1 | 2018-11-05 19:17 | Vitru ♦11 | Are you not fearing that a gunman could use this information and hunt down those LGBTQ bars? |
| 2 | 2018-11-05 19:53 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I am adding lgbtq=primary to venues which are already tagged gay=yes.On the tagging mailing list ( https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-October/040144.html ), I suggest:"*When* to add a lgbtq=yes tag can be hard to know. In some places a gaybar can be easily identifi... | |
| 13107481 by Tom Morris @ 2012-09-14 13:39 | 1 | 2018-11-02 14:49 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | "Brighton"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1123739135 this in the herbedies! |
| 2 | 2018-11-02 14:59 | Tom Morris ♦3 | @rorym Ah: that's one hell of a mess up. Will fix. | |
| 31061967 by NoelB @ 2015-05-12 18:32 | 1 | 2018-10-25 09:53 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | What's "San Antone" here? An addr:housename? Shouldn't you add that tag? 😉 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘵 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘵 Don't forget neighbour too ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3512925893 ) |
| 3158948 by cliffcake @ 2009-11-19 11:32 | 1 | 2018-10-19 09:30 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I presume we don't need this "addr:townland" tags anymore? 😁 I was curious what source:name="bin tag" was, but I figure it's the tag on the bins. 😁https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/445524863#map=19/52.77909/-8.43159I have removed that here: https://www.... |
| 63484773 by James O'Donoghue @ 2018-10-13 13:05 | 1 | 2018-10-16 06:47 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi James! Welcome to OSM! I notice you've added a Holy Well here. You've actually added it 5 times, and created about 3 notes! That's a little overkill. 🙂 Thanks for your contributions. Please keep at it.I see you're using Maps.me, it's a great app, but when you add n... |
| 58767412 by Darragh102 @ 2018-05-07 18:50 | 1 | 2018-08-14 13:55 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Welcome to OSM! Just a heads up, you forgot to add any tags to this object ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/586398433#map=19/53.46239/-6.21253 ), which are important to mark what sort of thing it isThanks for all your contributions. |
| 45474636 by alexxdaly @ 2017-01-25 12:56 | 1 | 2018-07-18 14:49 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You added a supermarket here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4632043959 ). But it looks strange to me. Are you sure it's a supermarket? It's a big building, but there is no car park(s) around it, so I don't think it's a supermarket.... |
| 60602849 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2018-07-11 08:24 | 1 | 2018-07-11 08:31 | ZeiP ♦15 | landuse=government is completely undocumented, so I don't think you should be replacing existing tagging with it without discussion. landuse=institutional would make a bit more sense: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dinstitutional |
| 2 | 2018-07-11 09:01 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Just because something doesn't exist on the wiki doesn't mean it's wrong. 😉The official residence of the president of germany ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.51635/13.35208 ) doesn't have any specific landuse tag.landuse=industrial seems to be used for a wei... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-11 10:17 | ZeiP ♦15 | It doesn't mean it's wrong (you can use any tags you want), but changing another mapper's tagging to an undocumented and very little used tag is. Changed to landuse=institutional: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60607689 | |
| 43975930 by ZeiP @ 2016-11-27 02:43 | 1 | 2018-07-11 08:25 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You've made Áras an Uachtaráin a landuse=commerical? That's not right... I've changed it ( here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60602849#map=16/53.3613/-6.3176 ) to landuse=government |
| 2 | 2018-07-11 08:28 | ZeiP ♦15 | Yeah, I noticed that may not be the best one. I would put it down as a residence also, since that's the best one there really is. landuse=government isn't documented at all, so I don't think you should be replacing existing tagging with that. | |
| 43994938 by ZeiP @ 2016-11-28 01:01 | 1 | 2018-07-11 08:19 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. Does it really make sense for this to be landuse=residential? That seems a little.... off... |
| 2 | 2018-07-11 08:23 | ZeiP ♦15 | IMO it was the best fit for a residence. I looked through the documented landuse=* values again, and I do still think it's the best fit. Do you have other suggestions? | |
| 59866274 by sportszonedirect @ 2018-06-15 07:01 | 1 | 2018-06-15 07:53 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Welcoem to OSM! You asked for a review of this, so here it is.It's great too see businesses add details. We don't really use "descriptions".*but* you've one beginner mistake, you added the details to a road! This way/line ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23578413 ... |
| 2 | 2018-06-15 10:35 | freebeer ♦1,598 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59870819 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus spamvertisement spammy spam, thanks rorym | |
| 3 | 2018-06-15 10:44 | sportszonedirect ♦1 | Hi rorym, sorry for the mistake. I will try to fix it this end. Eric | |
| 4 | 2018-06-15 11:11 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | @freebeer I don't think it's fair to (repeatidly) call it spam. It's an honest mistake from a new user. 2/3 of the tags entered weren't spam, and were useful contact information if added to a shop. description tag shouldn't really be in OSM, but there are 1,100,000+ entries ... | |
| 5 | 2018-06-18 05:45 | freebeer ♦1,598 | Yes, you are absolutely correct. My trigger-happy response was due to this `newbie' mistake being repeated dozens of times in the US (and more around the world) by SEO spammers looking to get their client's names on the map, rather than honest individuals. Here the street name was not ch... | |
| 58403571 by oacpsrl @ 2018-04-25 10:22 | 1 | 2018-04-25 13:21 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, and welcome to OSM! You asked for a review of this changeset, so here it is.This looks good. it's good to get details on things, like contact details and so forth. I don't think the start_date is needed for companies |
| 56671961 by Elena Voloshina @ 2018-02-25 21:57 | 1 | 2018-04-24 15:18 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, Are you sure about the english name of this restaurant... it doesn't look right.... |
| 58200454 by NikkiS1912 @ 2018-04-18 13:05 | 1 | 2018-04-22 18:38 | domod ♦5 | Dear NikkiS1912, these edits seem to be wrong, or look as if someone has been playing. Is it possible that you accidentally saved some test edits, or that someone else used your account? I would be glad if you could review the changes and correct or undo them. |
| 2 | 2018-04-24 14:46 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I have reverted this here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58376295 | |
| 57883458 by FrischLuftWege @ 2018-04-07 05:49 | 1 | 2018-04-20 14:50 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello, I notice you've been adding a lot of untagged ways around Achill (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577308270 ), are these legitimate ways, or are they dud?Viel Spaß in Achill |
| 2 | 2018-04-20 14:59 | FrischLuftWege ♦5 | Hi there, I started to define several multipolygons to mark the land usage. Still work in progress unfortunately | |
| 3 | 2018-04-20 15:05 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | OK, I figured it was that. I was going to delete the ways, but I'll wait a while until you're finished. | |
| 58201405 by aoife_t123 @ 2018-04-18 13:30 | 1 | 2018-04-18 15:33 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you asked for a review. Similar to before ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58201510#map=19/53.39172/-6.17992 ), square buildings are nice. :)You've added one long building here, tagged as "terrace", but looking on the aerial imagery, it looks more like several separat... |
| 58201486 by aoife_t123 @ 2018-04-18 13:32 | 1 | 2018-04-18 15:27 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, and this looks fine, except for my advice about S in the previous comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58201510 |
| 57181022 by aoife_t123 @ 2018-03-14 14:46 | 1 | 2018-04-18 15:23 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there. You added the name "spar" to this building. But, erm there already is a node/point (in the bottom left) for spar, so you don't need to have it twice. |
| 58201510 by aoife_t123 @ 2018-04-18 13:32 | 1 | 2018-04-18 15:19 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. You asked for a review of this change.This looks OK. One suggestion is to use the S button on iD (i.e. press S on your keyboard) when you have selected a building, and it will make the corners right angled. That's closer to how they are in the real world. It also takes the pressure off ... |
| 57903047 by Ayelmo @ 2018-04-08 00:20 | 1 | 2018-04-15 17:29 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there, You asked for a review of this, so here it is.This looks good. Things like names are important and can only be added by people on the groud, so thanks for doing that |
| 57793229 by Apt Signs @ 2018-04-04 07:09 | 1 | 2018-04-04 08:08 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi you asked for someone to review this edit.I think you might have gotten something wrong. In this change, you've changed the name of a townland to your company name ("Apt Signs"). That's not right at all! I've changed it back. Please don't do this again. Honest mi... |
| 51232840 by rdhma @ 2017-08-18 12:47 | 1 | 2018-03-28 13:23 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi,You added a way here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516622882/history ) but without any tags on it. |
| 2 | 2018-03-29 18:55 | rdhma ♦4 | Hello, tagged now, plus other trails added. | |
| 57386815 by JLunney @ 2018-03-21 14:21 | 1 | 2018-03-21 16:56 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there. You asked for a review.You're right Eddit Rockets is a little more a restaurant than a fast food place. Table service is often a good way to separate them. (Man I miss them vanilla malts)But you've lost out on the phone number! Might be nice to keep that around.You do... |
| 57386720 by JLunney @ 2018-03-21 14:17 | 1 | 2018-03-21 16:52 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there. You asked for a review.I'm a little confused, there already is a McCabe's pharmacy in OSM right beside this ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1518906876 ). Isn't this the same? We don't need the point twice, unless there actually are 2 separate pharmacies. So you... |
| 57386489 by JLunney @ 2018-03-21 14:10 | 1 | 2018-03-21 16:42 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review. This looks fine. If the shop isn't there anymore, then yes, deleting the node/point is exactly what you're supposed to do. 🙂 |
| 57386220 by JLunney @ 2018-03-21 14:02 | 1 | 2018-03-21 16:41 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review.I'm afraid I don't think this is quite right. If something's not there permanently, then you shouldn't really add it on OSM. Otherwise someone could come along in 3 years time looking for it.A good rule of thumb is to only add things that are going ... |
| 57385952 by JLunney @ 2018-03-21 13:55 | 1 | 2018-03-21 16:38 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there. You asked for a review.This looks fine. If you say it's there, then I trust you. The tagging is fine. This is certainly good enough. Like many things in OSM, you can always add more and more information. Is it wheelchair accessible? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wh... |
| 15897696 by Pat111 @ 2013-04-28 16:13 | 1 | 2018-03-21 14:13 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there. You added a road here called "Woodford Rd". Just for the record, in OSM we usually don't use name appreviations, like "Rd". it's better to use "Road" instead. Otherwise there are could be expanded either way. Is "St" street or saint? etc. :... |
| 57145455 by harryhainz @ 2018-03-13 13:23 | 1 | 2018-03-13 16:24 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. You asked for a review of this change, so here it is.This looks great. Lots of fine details that need local knowledge (like names).Welcome to OSM, please keep adding things. :) |
| 57111473 by mattymaps666 @ 2018-03-12 13:31 | 1 | 2018-03-13 08:36 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there, and welcome to OSM.You asked for a review of this changeset, so here it is.Thanks for your contribution. it's always good to get local knowledge .Are you sure about this building? The other building you deleted was added a month ago ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55... |
| 2 | 2018-03-13 08:38 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hang on. Is the new building called "Liam Rodgers Centre"? If so then you did nothing wrong. Usually in OSM we just change the name/tag of a building rather than deleting & redrawing, which confused me (Don't worry, there's nothing wrong with deleteing & redrawing) | |
| 56668392 by lokinmagnum @ 2018-02-25 18:57 | 1 | 2018-03-11 12:24 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there, and welcome to OSM. You asked for a review of this changeset, so here it is.This looks mostly fine. I don't think many data consumers use the "_1" tag trick. There are multiple ways to work around OSM's "only one key" limitation, this is one way. So eh, lo... |
| 56881490 by EoghanM @ 2018-03-04 20:51 | 1 | 2018-03-07 10:22 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. You asked for a review, so here it is.This looks good. You're right, if there's a village there, we should add a `place=village` node. The townland alone isn't enough. (There are plenty of townlands which only cover a few fields and aren't also a village).I wonder tho... |
| 2 | 2018-03-11 22:14 | EoghanM ♦36 | Hmmm, looking at photo on the wikipedia article, can see it's actually of some shops in what OSM has as Ballincollig:https://www.google.ie/maps/@51.8879891,-8.588527,3a,90y,187.92h,86.22t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sY2dFM6PJq-uizkGwxC-Xrg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en | |
| 3 | 2018-03-11 22:29 | EoghanM ♦36 | Disregard; have removed that photo from that wikipedia article as was likely copy pasted. Think the node is accurate enough for the village based on wp discussion of Saint Peter's church | |
| 56799755 by ent8r @ 2018-03-01 20:11 | 1 | 2018-03-02 10:30 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I can understand the reasoning behind making some tools stop complaining, but this school almost certainly has *an* address. It might not have a house number, but it *must* be possible for them to get post. |
| 2 | 2018-03-02 16:01 | ent8r ♦1,426 | But why does it have no housenumber? Without a number you can't get post anyway... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-03 14:58 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | > Without a number you can't get post anyway...Er.... You're not familiar with Irish addresses are you?35% of addresses are shared/duplicate, usually in places where housenumbers aren't used. | |
| 4 | 2018-03-03 15:01 | ent8r ♦1,426 | I'm from Germany... :) Sorry for that!Actually in Germany every house has to have a number and it can't be duplicate or shared with another house... Your system is pretty confusing, isn't it? | |
| 5 | 2018-03-03 15:14 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Yes it is confusing. :)There's a new postcode system which gives every address a unique number which can help with this. | |
| 6 | 2018-03-03 15:16 | ent8r ♦1,426 | Ah... OK. I removed the "noaddress=yes" tag again and if the address is finally known you or somebody else can add the real address! | |
| 56797427 by Rallymap @ 2018-03-01 18:31 | 1 | 2018-03-02 10:28 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM. You asked for a review of this edit, so here it is.This looks fine. Thanks for the contribution. OSM doesn't have a lot of address details, so all these contributions are welcome and useful. 😁There's also a addr:housename field/tag but I think name should be ... |
| 46425749 by Dafo43 @ 2017-02-26 20:49 | 1 | 2018-02-20 14:54 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Here you added an untagged way ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477352951#map=17/53.54606/-9.33743 ) what's that supposed to be? |
| 2 | 2018-02-20 15:01 | Dafo43 ♦31 | Presume it was when I was fixing some of the townland boundaries. I've marked it as forestry now. | |
| 19298429 by Boggedy @ 2013-12-05 23:31 | 1 | 2018-02-20 08:48 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | here you added a big untagged way ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250246300 ). What's going on here? |
| 3080343 by katpatuka @ 2009-11-10 07:59 | 1 | 2018-02-16 12:09 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. In this edit, you changed the `name` of this stretch of the Zambezi to "Zambeze". Is that right? The name:en is still Zambezi. I thought the "name" was Zambezi? |
| 2 | 2018-02-16 15:02 | katpatuka ♦194 | Oh, an 8-year-ago-edit... ;)I guess it should be Zambezi (don't know why I wrote Zambeze). enwiki starts with "The Zambezi (also spelled Zambeze and Zambesi) is the fourth-longest river in Africa [...]" though... feel free to change it :) | |
| 48189076 by JoashOlepus @ 2017-04-27 09:56 | 1 | 2018-02-15 08:15 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there. In this changeset, you addd an untagged tiny triangle here. I don't think there is much need for malaria elimination in Co. Limerick. 😉 I think I'll clean it up a bit. |
| 56244599 by Own Oh @ 2018-02-10 16:47 | 1 | 2018-02-14 13:08 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you asked for a review, so here it is. This mostly looks fine. I don't know about the `natural=wood` that's usually for naturally growing woods. Whereas this is more like landuse=trees (or landuse=grass). What do you think? |
| 2 | 2018-02-19 09:20 | Own Oh ♦21 | yes I have been inconsistently adding polys for these but landuse tag makes more sense. | |
| 56245764 by Own Oh @ 2018-02-10 17:41 | 1 | 2018-02-12 16:50 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is.Anything in particular you want a review with? Have FF really moved out of St Lukes? Bit of an end of an era! |
| 2 | 2018-02-19 09:19 | Own Oh ♦21 | FF sold the building a few years back. | |
| 56244778 by Own Oh @ 2018-02-10 16:54 | 1 | 2018-02-12 16:48 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You asked for a review, so here it is. You're not new to OSM though. 🙂I was going to say that the `landuse=greenfield` looked weird. But a quick check of taginfo tells me that there are 41,000 of them in OSM, so clearly this is correct.Is there anything in particular that you wer... |
| 41225479 by Seemant Kulleen @ 2016-08-03 21:47 | 1 | 2018-02-12 13:31 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. I notice you added a name for the river here (Maramba). Is there any reason the name doesn't continue all the way to the Zambezi? There's a small stretch ( here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23817331#map=15/-17.8867/25.8686 ) which has no "name" tag. Doesn't this hav... |
| 55974882 by Furfur93 @ 2018-02-01 19:01 | 1 | 2018-02-09 09:38 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello. Welcome to OSM! 😁 You asked for a review, of this change, so here it is.This is all good edits. It's always good to see people looking after their local area in OSM.You added some houses, did you know that you can press S in the iD editor and it'll make your corners right... |
| 2 | 2018-02-09 11:41 | Furfur93 ♦1 | Hi! Thank you for reviewing :)I will try to fix my mistakes so i learn from it. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-09 12:24 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | That's OK. We all start somewhere. 😁 Lots of these aren't "mistakes", they aren't *wrong*. There are just things that could be done better. :) | |
| 55979332 by shiftee @ 2018-02-01 22:08 | 1 | 2018-02-08 10:52 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a a review, so here it is. This looks great. Thanks for spotting, and fixing, this mistake. 👍😁 |
| 2 | 2018-02-08 11:00 | shiftee ♦11 | No problem. I use the iD editor and couldn't see who made the mistake and was worried there might be more like it. I'm not sure if that would normally be followed up on | |
| 3 | 2018-02-08 12:39 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | In iD, if you click on a node or way, there's a "View on openstreetmap.org" link on the bottom left. Clicking on that brings you to the 'view' page for a node/way/relation ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/453344874 ). You can click on the 'View history' to show... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-08 12:54 | shiftee ♦11 | That's brilliant, thanks | |
| 55935292 by JLunney @ 2018-01-31 14:42 | 1 | 2018-02-06 09:58 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there. You asked for a review of this.I'm not sure what a "ball wall" is. I don't know what (if any!) OSM tag there is for that. It's OK to make up your own tags. For some things unique to Ireland, there aren't any "correct" tags yet. So this looks fine... |
| 55934512 by aoife_t123 @ 2018-01-31 14:21 | 1 | 2018-02-05 15:12 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello and welcome to OSM! You asked for a review of this changeset.This change looks fine. It's always good to have more houses entered (despite the project being called Open STREET Map, it actually has much more buildings than streets).The web editor (iD) has the ability to square buil... |
| 55934447 by JLunney @ 2018-01-31 14:20 | 1 | 2018-02-05 15:08 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, You asked for a review, so here it is.Thanks for this edit. Lots of good stuff here, with lots of details. 👍🙂You've added a node (point) here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5375514911 ) for a basketball court. However you put it inside a way (area) of an existing basketb... |
| 55934043 by JLunney @ 2018-01-31 14:09 | 1 | 2018-02-02 11:02 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review for this, so here it is.It's good that you're adding POIs, things that can only be added by someone on the ground. Please continue to add more of them. 👍😃 It's also get to get more details, phone numbers, opening hours etc. |
| 2 | 2018-02-02 11:56 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | However, there are one or two simple, and common, beginner mistakes. You added the Applewood vets ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5375493810 ), and for the phone number it's better to put it in in "international format", i.e. "+353-1-...". Then it's usable to anyon... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-02 13:38 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You've also moved a post box to the other side of the street. Which is OK, but a little odd. Did An Post remove the one beside the dry cleaners? If there are actually 2 post boxes (one near the dry cleaners, the other where the node now is), then you should have 2 postboxes in OSM. 🙂You&... | |
| 55934997 by JLunney @ 2018-01-31 14:33 | 1 | 2018-01-31 15:37 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review so here it is.This looks fine. :) It's always good to have Points of Interest (POI) like shops. We can't get them from aerial imagery. It's good that you put in a little bit more details, rather than just "shop=yes" or something.\... |
| 55847110 by Neil1234 @ 2018-01-29 03:01 | 1 | 2018-01-31 10:53 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there. Welcome to OSM!You asked for a review, so here it is.I'm a little confused by this. You've added a (weirdly shaped) pond in a middle of some back gardens. I can't see any ponds there in the Bing aerial imagery. What's going on? I've removed it in this chang... |
| 55844231 by Alex Irwin @ 2018-01-28 23:26 | 1 | 2018-01-30 11:18 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | A review was requested, and for the record, I did this (& the other) on the other changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55844257 |
| 55844257 by Alex Irwin @ 2018-01-28 23:28 | 1 | 2018-01-30 11:18 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review on this edit (and the previous one https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55844231 ), so here it is.Thanks for adding this, and the house number. We can't get addresses from the aerial imagery, so we need someone local to add them. Thanks for this... |
| 55801603 by John S Smith @ 2018-01-27 12:11 | 1 | 2018-01-30 08:51 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, welcome to OSM! You asked for a review, so here it is.I think you've made one or two newbie mistakes here. You added a part of the path here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556245385#map=18/53.34689/-6.52044 ) and you added the `access=no` tag. That's for things which the publ... |
| 55787974 by cilliank27 @ 2018-01-26 22:06 | 1 | 2018-01-29 11:04 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello and welcome to OSM! You asked for a review of this change.You marked this as "natural=grassland", but that's more for savannah in Africa or something, not a patch of grass in a housing estate! 🙂 I've changed it to landuse=grass which is correct for this. |
| 55695808 by PhilOptinergy @ 2018-01-23 20:45 | 1 | 2018-01-29 09:02 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is.This is very good for a new mapper. you're including a lot of details, which is great. eircodes/addresses, opening hours, lots of details on the pub, etc.The only thing I'd question is the farm buildings to the top right, you added building=far... |
| 16858468 by Reesy_S @ 2013-07-07 09:23 | 1 | 2018-01-24 08:42 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! In this change, you added a way here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229044998#map=17/52.13806/-7.04833 ). But there's no tags! :) I presume this was a simple mistake. From your comment, and the aerial imagery, it looks like a cliff path. Would you care to add that detail yourself? Or w... |
| 2 | 2018-01-25 13:51 | Reesy_S ♦1 | Hi RoryM - sorry, I'm no expert in OSM - yes please, add the tags that you like. I see the path is now showing as over water in parts, which strikes me as dangerous. Anyway, do whatever you think is best. Cheers, Simon | |
| 3 | 2018-01-25 13:57 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I've fixed it hre https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55741408 | |
| 55696655 by Own Oh @ 2018-01-23 21:22 | 1 | 2018-01-24 16:46 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is. This looks fine. You can make areas have "right angled corners" in iD, sometimes that can be more accurate if they have right angled in the real world.I trust you that these houses have been demolished. *But* there is still some address points the... |
| 2 | 2018-01-24 16:53 | Own Oh ♦21 | I do not know about the numbering. | |
| 3 | 2018-01-24 16:55 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Well, are there any houses/buildings there now? If they've all be leveled, then it looks like those numbers are now gone and you can delete them if you want. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-24 16:57 | Own Oh ♦21 | ach, I just re-added them. In any case, there are no buildings and the houses are gone entirely. As per http://www.thejournal.ie/five-lamps-junction-demolished-3804491-Jan2018/ | |
| 55696624 by Own Oh @ 2018-01-23 21:21 | 1 | 2018-01-24 16:43 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You asked for a review, so here it is.Now, I know the thing you have added. it's a big old, semi-circular, metal yoke, right? It doesn't actually lift the bridge any more, right?So I don't know really *what* type of thing this is.Now, OSM has a free form and flexible t... |
| 55692408 by L Leahy @ 2018-01-23 18:19 | 1 | 2018-01-24 16:38 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you asked for a review, so here it is. I see you did some HOT work in Bangladesh, you haven't changed the commit message. 😉You have added the name to a crossroads here. Thanks! 😁 It's that sort of local knowledge that we need.*But* you just put the name on the point (i.e.... |
| 55602280 by Own Oh @ 2018-01-20 12:32 | 1 | 2018-01-23 10:41 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is.I'm not 100% sure about the right way to tag woods and such. The OSM Wiki documents 6 different approaches and tagging schemes ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest )! 🙂Anyone who uses OSM data should take them into account, so your "... |
| 55651526 by eifelmap @ 2018-01-22 11:15 | 1 | 2018-01-22 14:15 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is.This looks fine. You have added one house, which I can see in the aerial imagery. There are a few houses there, why not add the rest? 🙂 |
| 55611636 by narus @ 2018-01-20 19:34 | 1 | 2018-01-22 12:46 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is. This looks quite a simple and straight forward change. I can't see anything wrong. I like how you added many tags to the castle. Maybe someone with more knowledge of the local history could explain if it's exactly as you describe (e.g. There were thin... |
| 55526116 by Own Oh @ 2018-01-17 16:17 | 1 | 2018-01-19 13:49 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is. I don't know if what you're adding is accurate (I'll take your word for it 😁), but I can give hints on how it's in OSM.Mostly this is fine. You have glued the construction site to the RTE outline (at this node https://www.openstreetma... |
| 55575258 by noslenp @ 2018-01-19 11:25 | 1 | 2018-01-19 13:18 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, and from an OSM data perspective this looks fine. If that's the name, then that's the name. Maybe another local can confirm? |
| 2 | 2018-01-19 13:21 | noslenp ♦1 | No I am quite happy that is ok - thansk for your help Philip | |
| 55527989 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2018-01-17 17:32 | 1 | 2018-01-17 19:49 | rdhma ♦4 | Hello, could you message me via OSM if a tag is missing. I've put a lot of time into surveying and mapping this area, so don't want to have to re-enter the trails. |
| 2 | 2018-01-18 10:24 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | OK. It was only a teeny little segment. You can see it here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55527989Feel free to recreate it | |
| 55525620 by Own Oh @ 2018-01-17 15:57 | 1 | 2018-01-17 17:57 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is. One thing I'll say is that you've created a building within a building, which is wrong. There already is an outline for the building (57 Gardiner St.) ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233487785 ). You've changing it to a single point build... |
| 55525414 by Own Oh @ 2018-01-17 15:48 | 1 | 2018-01-17 17:46 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, but I'm not really sure what could be wrong here. I don't know the area. But if there's a convience shop there, then this is all fine.In your comment you talk about "health food shop", but you've added a convience. If you meant an actual heal... |
| 55524343 by Own Oh @ 2018-01-17 15:08 | 1 | 2018-01-17 17:40 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is.Firstly I'm not sure what an adult playground is. And I'm curious. 🙂Anyway, I don't think "name" is the proper place to put that data, since I presume that's not the actual name, right? It's a description of the thin... |
| 55524266 by Own Oh @ 2018-01-17 15:05 | 1 | 2018-01-17 17:34 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is. This looks fine. You've impoved the map by changing an undescriptive name to a real name. Thanks. 👍 |
| 49676564 by rdhma @ 2017-06-19 20:35 | 1 | 2018-01-17 17:32 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You added a way here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501806361#map=19/52.70627/-8.73282 ) but you didn't put any tags on it. I've deleted it now, to clean up. But maybe you should remap it with the correct attributes (path/track/etc) |
| 55524240 by Own Oh @ 2018-01-17 15:04 | 1 | 2018-01-17 17:29 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is.The only change you did here was add "(under renovation)" to the name of the hotel. Obviously to mark that it's under renovation!So is that OK? I dunno. It's a little tricky. The name of the hotel has not changed to add "(under r... |
| 55474401 by pairish @ 2018-01-15 20:14 | 1 | 2018-01-16 08:38 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello and welcome to OSM! I'm one of the OSM Ireland old hands. I notice you requested a review of this, so let's have a look.This is mostly pretty good. Everyone in the world can see things from aerial imagery (we call it armchair mapping), but there are things you can't see from... |
| 55372508 by Rajsamand Local Guide @ 2018-01-12 07:54 | 1 | 2018-01-12 08:54 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you asked for a review, and this all looks good. Is there anything in particular that you're unsure about? |
| 2 | 2018-01-12 09:12 | Rajsamand Local Guide ♦3 | Not now, if i have any confusion in map, i'll ask you. | |
| 3 | 2018-01-12 09:14 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Just keep requesting a review, and people, incl me, will pick it up and look at it. 😁 | |
| 55322985 by Gael Rehault @ 2018-01-10 13:58 | 1 | 2018-01-10 14:59 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello! Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review, so here it is.Here, you just added the `landuse=recreation_ground` tag to the park, which already has the `leisure=park` tag. But I'm not sure if `landuse=recreation_ground` fits here.The Wiki documents that as "An open green space for... |
| 53595926 by kev_mapster @ 2017-11-07 23:06 | 1 | 2018-01-09 14:06 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review of this edit, so here it is.I can see what you're trying to do, but I don't think what you've done is quite right. You've connected the post office to the way/area for the little retail zone. This sorta moved it outside the centra. It doesn't make ... |
| 34416740 by Hans C @ 2015-10-03 21:51 | 1 | 2016-02-01 20:54 | Stephen_Co_Antrim ♦2 | Most is actually in the townlands of Ardgehane and Donaghmore, but does this line add a feature? |
| 2 | 2016-02-03 02:03 | Hans C ♦1 | Hallo Stephan,It is great that you inserted th townland boundaries of Ballinglanna, Rocksavage and more onto the map.Ballinglanna Cove is a settlement of 17 houses houses built in 1980. They were built on land that is entirely in the the townland of Rocksavage.This line "Ballinglanna Co... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-09 09:18 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, In this changeset, you added this little way ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373701765 ) with a coastline tag. I think that's wrong? Coastlines can be tricky in OSM, and I think this might have been a mistake. I've deleted it.Likewise this untagged way ( https://www.openstreetm... | |
| 47220415 by sekeleti08 @ 2017-03-28 06:58 | 1 | 2018-01-05 17:18 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. You added a house here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/483165329 ) with name="Luka's residence". That sounds more like a description? Is that the actual name of the building? |
| 35791541 by SK53 @ 2015-12-06 18:04 | 1 | 2018-01-05 13:22 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | This is a weird, long and untagged way ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384707302#map=12/51.6206/-9.3257 ). I presume that's a mistake and can be deleted? |
| 2 | 2018-01-06 10:47 | SK53 ♦864 | Yes it can be deleted. It's not a mistake, but a temporary element which I should have removed once the boundary was complete. It is a very rough approximation of a barony boundary, which I used as a guide to find the proper townland boundaries. It may appear in the history of the barony relati... | |
| 55182158 by b-unicycling @ 2018-01-05 10:04 | 1 | 2018-01-05 11:11 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you asked for a review. I think the only thing you did here was add the New Road to 3 different administrative relations? Is that what you intended? I don't think that's a right move, since it sorta makes 2 of the townlands invalid (geometrically). I can undo it if you want? |
| 49147210 by Olemon @ 2017-05-31 21:09 | 1 | 2018-01-04 12:20 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | hello. I see you added a few ring forts. I've been using the historic=earthworks earthworks=rath tagging scheme. I've remapped all these using that, and I've also replaced them with circular ways, instead of point, because it's more accurate.I'm glad to see someone else ... |
| 48494980 by vanwengade @ 2017-05-08 08:40 | 1 | 2017-12-22 08:46 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hallo. Was heißt diese Node ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4841250133#map=19/49.04147/8.40448 ) "Batschka"? Und dieses Way ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492064899 )? Es hat kein Tags. |
| 26072580 by Diego Guidotti @ 2014-10-14 13:53 | 1 | 2017-12-21 14:52 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there. You've added a few roads around this area (e.g. this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307736524 ), and you've added the "ID" tag to them, which I think is a little wrong. I don't think that tag is used by much (any) software? Did you mean to use the "ref&... |
| 2 | 2017-12-21 15:42 | Diego Guidotti ♦1 | I have modified some DEPHA data (imported long time ago, with very low res) using the sat images. I kept the depha tag and the ID tag that was used during import. I think that we can drop it. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-21 15:58 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | OK. Maybe we should look at the original import and see what the ID field is supposed to be. Maybe we can change it to something useful for OSM :) | |
| 54201508 by abdullahi101 @ 2017-11-30 10:44 | 1 | 2017-12-21 14:57 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there! Welcome to OSM! I wonder if I could just point out a little mistake here. You've added 2 lines ("ways") here without adding any tags to them. For the first one ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538189246#map=19/9.49956/49.08061 ) I just added the highway=residental tag, si... |
| 54810636 by arvdk @ 2017-12-21 10:40 | 1 | 2017-12-21 11:12 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there. You deleted the (obviously) wrong maxspeed. Are you aware of the correct maxspeed? If so it might be good to add that. |
| 2 | 2017-12-21 12:09 | arvdk ♦302 | Hi rorym,I am not aware of the correct maxspeed, sorry. But better no information than false information, imho. Also see http://product.itoworld.com/map/124?lon=-7.09161&lat=53.44930&zoom=16 , most ramps are not tagged with maxspeed nearby. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-21 12:44 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | That's a good point. And it's such a tiny road, we can probably assume. Thanks for cleaning it up. 👍 | |
| 50464545 by RinIRL @ 2017-07-21 17:35 | 1 | 2017-12-18 14:31 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there. Could you tell me what's going on with the historic_1=yes tag on Dublin House here? I've never seen that before and I'm confused.you also added a node with a building tag *inside* the other building. I've removed that, since that doesn't make sense |
| 2 | 2017-12-18 19:03 | RinIRL ♦1 | probably an error on early edit going off the keys in the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historicThere's a bookshop within part of the overall building but the whole building is not a bookshop hence why it was done like that. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-20 13:40 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | OK, maybe do you wanna fix it up? 🙂 | |
| 54627571 by Michael P Wilson @ 2017-12-14 15:33 | 1 | 2017-12-20 09:10 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. Just FYI there's a query about one of the pubs you added on this OSM note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1243616#map=19/51.89759/-8.46957 |
| 54764368 by Sameh Mohamed @ 2017-12-19 16:34 | 1 | 2017-12-20 08:33 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is. It's good that you added the denomination tag, since more data always helps. The more accurate and detailed we can make the map, the better! I was going to suggest that to you earlier. 🙂If you need any other OSM help, feel free to message me if you&... |
| 54764355 by Sameh Mohamed @ 2017-12-19 16:34 | 1 | 2017-12-20 08:31 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is. This looks great. Good job! 👍 |
| 54762604 by Sameh Mohamed @ 2017-12-19 15:23 | 1 | 2017-12-19 16:07 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello and welcome to OSM! You asked for a review, so here it is.This looks fine. Thanks for the contribution. If you're a local and know this is true, then that's all we need. My only question is if the building ( No 13 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218177197 ) is 100% a mosque or ... |
| 2 | 2017-12-19 16:28 | Sameh Mohamed ♦1 | It's a two-floor building operating by a local Islamic organization. the ground floor is a mosque and the second floor is rented as a residential place. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-19 16:50 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Ah OK, then what you did is probably OK. 👍Welcome to OSM! Keep mapping! | |
| 54676213 by R Segurado @ 2017-12-16 10:31 | 1 | 2017-12-18 16:19 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review of this changeset, so here it is. I think you're trying to mark the canal as an area (right?), but you've drawn a line that doesn't join up to the start, so it's really like a weird long C shaped canal.... |
| 2 | 2017-12-18 16:19 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Would you like me to clean up the canal, or do you wanna take a stab at it? | |
| 3 | 2017-12-18 16:37 | R Segurado ♦1 | Thanks! The weird long C-shape was already there, I just continued that "convention" eastwards to the sea dock. Since you agree that is not an established OSM convention (or workaround), and if we can agree that there is no need for every change in canal width and shape to be depicted (at ... | |
| 54609044 by AnthonyO89 @ 2017-12-13 21:58 | 1 | 2017-12-18 15:48 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Welcome to OSM! You've asked for a review, and I'll have to get back to you on it, but I think there's a few little mistakes here. like the residental multipolygon relation having an overlap, and a kinda wonky wall ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522451532 ) |
| 53569470 by stere0123 @ 2017-11-07 00:37 | 1 | 2017-12-18 11:16 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello! Welcome to OSM. In this changeset you have added a walmart ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538863956 ), great! But, one thing. In OSM we usually put addresses in full. So instead of "S Suncoast Blvd" it's better to spell it out full, so "Boulevard" instead of &quo... |
| 46918041 by VictorIE @ 2017-03-17 05:57 | 1 | 2017-12-15 12:44 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You left some untagged ways here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235543455 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235543453#map=19/53.33074/-6.26178What's going on with them? Maybe best to just delete the ways if the buildings are gone... |
| 2 | 2017-12-17 02:37 | VictorIE ♦911 | Thanks for noting this. Fixed :)They're demolished buildings. I wanted to note that they were demolished to prevent them being re-mapped. | |
| 52564873 by ryan1234 @ 2017-10-02 13:39 | 1 | 2017-12-15 12:42 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM. You asked for a review, so here it is.The only thing you did here was create an outline around Buggar's Bush ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529472692 ), but you didn't put any tags or anything on it, making it invisible to everything. I've removed it, sin... |
| 54631165 by Chirprita @ 2017-12-14 17:45 | 1 | 2017-12-15 09:21 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review, so here it is.This is mostly pretty good. There's a few newbie mistakes. You entered the playground ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/546875187 ) as "leisure=park" which is more for a regular park. We have "leisure=playground"... |
| 7150828 by J_omcc @ 2011-02-01 00:11 | 1 | 2017-12-15 09:13 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you entered a firestation in Mountmellick ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1130217277/history ), but from the aerial imagery it looks like there's nothing there. And someone has just drawn a playground around it (which matches the aerials). Is that right? Is this a firestation or is tha... |
| 53593921 by herriotto @ 2017-11-07 21:10 | 1 | 2017-12-14 17:23 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You added a long terrace on the sea front in this changeset. However you made a mistake with splitting it up. You shouldn't put the untagged ways in the middle. It's better to make lots of buildings, which are glued together.JOSM's terracer plugin can make this easy. |
| 2 | 2017-12-15 17:23 | herriotto ♦47 | Nice one Rory, I'm still getting to grips with some of the tools and plugins available. Which "untagged ways in the middle" are you referring to? Thanks | |
| 54609125 by AnthonyO89 @ 2017-12-13 22:03 | 1 | 2017-12-14 09:25 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You asked for a review, and similar to that last changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54609113 ), you've got the mapping for the tree a little wrong. |
| 54609113 by AnthonyO89 @ 2017-12-13 22:02 | 1 | 2017-12-14 09:24 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review, so here it is.You've added on object in this change ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5282837222 ), and er, that's not quite right. In OSM we use the "name" tag for, well, the name of things. And we need some extra tags to explai... |
| 54549808 by EoghanM @ 2017-12-11 20:35 | 1 | 2017-12-12 08:26 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is. Nothing wrong with this. The GNS data is a bit hairy, it's good to clean it up as you go along.I think most geocoding software won't actually use those tags to figure out the county, so it was unlikely to have broken anything. 🤷Still, good ... |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 09:58 | EoghanM ♦36 | Thanks, probably in the back of my mind knew that the tags came from some sort of erroneous an automatic import (GNS data). Thanks for alleviating my concerns :D | |
| 3 | 2017-12-12 10:09 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | It is written on the "note" of the node! 😉😉 | |
| 4 | 2017-12-12 10:43 | EoghanM ♦36 | Should that note be removed now that humans have reviewed the place??I saw that note, but the uncertainty was from where the information 'place_county->Waterford' originally came from; e.g. was it someone at 'GNS' (I don't know what that is btw) making a special note to... | |
| 5155134 by pf_irl @ 2010-07-06 22:48 | 1 | 2017-12-11 10:50 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you added a point for "highest point in tory island" (this point: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/804468936 ), and it has lately been changed in this changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54468124#map=16/55.2632/-8.1925 ), saying that the elevation value was probably w... |
| 2 | 2017-12-11 12:46 | mbe57 ♦18 | Yes. SRTM and Wikipedia indicates that Dún Bhaloir is the hightes point, at around 88 meters.So I suppose the 200+ values for peaks in OSM are meant - without notice - to be in feet (which is not OSM standard unit ...) | |
| 3 | 2017-12-11 13:59 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | The original value from 7 years ago was "280m", and 280 feet is 85 metres. 🤷 | |
| 54468124 by mbe57 @ 2017-12-08 19:34 | 1 | 2017-12-11 10:50 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | It looks like that value of 280m was added in 2010 by pf_irl ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/5155134 ), I've left a comment on that changeset. |
| 54431820 by nano1707 @ 2017-12-07 13:32 | 1 | 2017-12-07 15:48 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM. You asked for a review of this change, so here it is.I'm afraid you've made a bit of a mistake with this building ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/545257648 ) by putting it on top of what's marked as a road in OSM ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70755936... |
| 54414656 by JohnUnr34l @ 2017-12-06 21:13 | 1 | 2017-12-07 09:10 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review of this edit, so here it is.You're right, this *is* 2 "paths" on the top and the bottom. (I was there recently).You've added `footway=sidewalk` to the path, and I don't think that's right, since it's not a path bes... |
| 2 | 2017-12-07 09:45 | JohnUnr34l ♦1 | Thank you for your reply, If you look at the other pier, the west pier, it is the same and so are the other juts in the water. I have even checked the Wicklow piers and they are done the same way with paths. I agree, it doesn't seem like the right way, but for continuity I thought to keep them ... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-07 09:48 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I might take a look later, see if I can clean it up a little | |
| 54397399 by Fiola @ 2017-12-06 10:59 | 1 | 2017-12-06 12:26 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review, so here it is.This looks good. You've added some details to the new coastal trail (like width/lit/etc). You've connected the path to the road, which is important for topology/routing.You have the path going slightly into the sea at the co... |
| 54366808 by travellingintheshadows @ 2017-12-05 14:26 | 1 | 2017-12-05 16:39 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review, so here it is. This looks like a fine edit. Adding some footways, and you've correctly ensured they are connected to the roads (which is important for routing).The building you added looks fine. If you know more details of the building (like what ... |
| 54291990 by Tacozelf @ 2017-12-03 09:12 | 1 | 2017-12-03 16:15 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Welcome to OSM! This looks like a nice edit, making the map better. :) |
| 54298586 by TOSiochain @ 2017-12-03 14:07 | 1 | 2017-12-03 16:12 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM. In this changeset, you said you added an irish name", but I can't see any Irish name on this road ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61942637 ) |
| 2 | 2017-12-03 19:30 | TOSiochain ♦1 | Hi. Sorry, I forgot to change the note after a previous edit.I actually changed the usage of the road to private. | |
| 54301475 by Meenatuggart @ 2017-12-03 16:04 | 1 | 2017-12-03 16:09 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Does it make sense to add a name tag to a stretch of coastline? Do you mean to add the name of the island? There already is the name on the townland ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6836983 ) so i don't think you need another name here? |
| 54220267 by andrefantin @ 2017-12-01 00:26 | 1 | 2017-12-01 15:14 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is.Firstly you changed the lane to `building=residental`, which is wrong. All the buildings are mapped, so it would be better to delete the way itself. |
| 2 | 2017-12-02 09:30 | andrefantin ♦2 | Thank you! Didn't know I could remove it. Done now. | |
| 54230565 by DragonPrime @ 2017-12-01 10:18 | 1 | 2017-12-01 10:57 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review, so here it is.This is perfectly fine. Nothing wrong here. 👍In OSM we can add more detail than just the building. In this changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54231514 ) I have added an `amenity=fuel` object inside this, this tells... |
| 54211366 by MMcN @ 2017-11-30 17:20 | 1 | 2017-11-30 18:32 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is.I was in the area recently and went through this junction. It has been changed from a roundabout to a regular intersection, so this looks good |
| 54200132 by Ilona_S @ 2017-11-30 09:36 | 1 | 2017-11-30 18:25 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a reviewof this edit, but surely an OSM note would be more appropriate |
| 42828128 by patrickcooney14 @ 2016-10-12 11:48 | 1 | 2017-11-29 09:37 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You changed a few tags from building=yes to landuse=farm here. which isn't right. "landuse" tags are for, well, landuses. Buildings are on land. :) So you should keep the building=yes tag. I've fixed it up |
| 54069728 by afitz @ 2017-11-25 11:27 | 1 | 2017-11-25 12:16 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You requested a review, so here it is.This looks good and fine. 3 buildings mapped well. You added building=house which is more detailed (ie better) than just building=yes. iD (& JOSM) have a 'make right angled' feature, which is good for buildings You missing the extension on ... |
| 53900905 by thejordany @ 2017-11-18 13:19 | 1 | 2017-11-24 09:28 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Just a note: You added a few stones but forgot to add a natural=rock tag to them, which means it couldn't be used. I've added that tag to them here, I took a guess that they were all rocks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54044837 |
| 51794236 by mylok @ 2017-09-06 21:47 | 1 | 2017-11-17 12:04 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you added some buildings here. I've fixed up the duplicate smaller building on the behind the house |
| 46768321 by cinziamaria @ 2017-03-11 18:05 | 1 | 2017-11-17 12:01 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you added a large square landuse=farmland (and a smaller area=yes area) in this change.I'm not sure what you were trying to do here, but it's not great mapping... I have removed them here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53872232 |
| 53832524 by BCNorwich @ 2017-11-16 08:08 | 1 | 2017-11-17 11:51 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. I noticed you added some addr:place=Swords here (and in other changesets). Are you sure that's right? I don't really know much about addr:place, but the docs on the wiki ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:place ) say it shouldn't be for places which also have an addr:s... |
| 2 | 2017-11-27 08:55 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hello, you are quite right about the wiki and I was unaware of the advice not to use addr:street and addr:place together. I don't think it has any detrimental effect except to add unnecessary data.I think I've now removed all tags addr:place=Swords that I added. If you see any I missed c... | |
| 19010494 by ronantynan @ 2013-11-20 10:51 | 1 | 2017-11-15 12:06 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you added a lot of areas in this edit without any tags, you just had the default area=yes tag, which doesn't really change anything. I've removed most of them in this changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53801299 ).We don't *really* map fields in OSM. You can al... |
| 48578628 by Palolo @ 2017-05-11 03:07 | 1 | 2017-11-14 17:55 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you added a few untagged nodes in this changeset. I'm not sure what they are, but I've removed them here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53778538 |
| 45715225 by Joney16 @ 2017-02-01 12:34 | 1 | 2017-11-14 17:01 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you've mapped a lot of cars in this edit. I'm afraid we don't map cars in OSM, they tend to move around ;) |
| 53262990 by OrlaO @ 2017-10-26 13:03 | 1 | 2017-11-09 15:55 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Review requested, so here we go.I'm not so sure about this edit. You've changed the "place" node, which is for, well, the village. Adding the Wikipedia link is fine. But the tourism tag is wrong. It's not for a listing of things that are available like that.OSM Is ge... |
| 53262891 by OrlaO @ 2017-10-26 12:59 | 1 | 2017-11-09 15:51 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Review requested, so here we go. Another good edit. Lots of nice detailed information, like contact details for phone & website. International phone numbers are best (I might go through and fix that up sometime) |
| 53262576 by OrlaO @ 2017-10-26 12:45 | 1 | 2017-11-09 15:49 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Review request, so here we go! Another good edit. Lots of local data here. Like the last edit, you don't really need the addr:city because of Irish addresses. It's good you added the community hall. |
| 53262368 by OrlaO @ 2017-10-26 12:35 | 1 | 2017-11-09 15:47 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You requested a review, so here we are. Another good edit. Lots of good, local knowledge info added here.Few points: The "operator" tag is really used for things like "What bank operates this ATM?" (Important for possible ATM fees), or "What bus company operates this rou... |
| 53263833 by OrlaO @ 2017-10-26 13:42 | 1 | 2017-11-09 15:36 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You requested a review, and I've covered it in the review of the other changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53262165 ), this node should probably be deleted |
| 53262165 by OrlaO @ 2017-10-26 12:25 | 1 | 2017-11-09 15:30 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You requested a review of this change, so here we go.This broadly looks pretty good. Local knowledge is good for OSM, and what it's all about. You've added a few important details to the pub. We don't need the description really, since no-one uses that. It's better to come up... |
| 2 | 2017-11-09 15:35 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | (Oh, and welcome to OSM!) | |
| 53218704 by Nirhaunz @ 2017-10-24 20:12 | 1 | 2017-11-09 13:47 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You requested a review, so here it is. Similar to the last edits, highway=residential isn't good for driveways. Squaring your buildings makes it better.Thanks for adding opening hours to the shop, that sort of info requires local knowledge! |
| 53218275 by MARIUS-FFB @ 2017-10-24 19:58 | 1 | 2017-11-09 13:45 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review of this edit, and that all looks fine to me. Watch out for the admin boundaries, we have a lot of little ones in Ireland. |
| 30718840 by gman007 @ 2015-05-02 11:38 | 1 | 2017-11-06 15:22 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. You added a GAA pitch here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342283498 ). But you put sport=soccer. Which can't be right! Is it gaelic football or hurling? If it's both you can put sport=gaelic_games |
| 42827827 by leonmoore1155 @ 2016-10-12 11:34 | 1 | 2017-11-06 14:50 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you only added an area=yes tag to this building ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447193538 ). You don't need that tag when it's a closed way, and you do need a tag to say what it is. I've added a building=yes tag to it.And it's best to make geographically small edits, ... |
| 52285383 by AliceExpedia @ 2017-09-22 18:12 | 1 | 2017-11-06 14:46 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. You added a building here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526849403#map=19/52.61668/-8.33570 ), but you only added the area=yes tag, you need more than that. I've added the building=yes tag to it. Since it's a closed line, you don't need the area=yes tag. |
| 53216770 by Nirhaunz @ 2017-10-24 19:08 | 1 | 2017-10-27 09:34 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You requested a review. Like previous edits, pretty good. Some similar beginner mistakes, like amenity=parking on a node, highway=residental instead of the highway=service,service=driveway.Here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534977983 ) you mapped it as 2 separate buildings, i.e. 2 ways. I ... |
| 53215788 by Nirhaunz @ 2017-10-24 18:31 | 1 | 2017-10-26 08:17 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You requested a review of this. Similar to your last edits this looks good over all. It's good that you're adding fine details to the car park for Lidl, it's always good to have details! (but low details is better than nothing). Be careful about gluing the carpark to the Lidl buil... |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 08:18 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | PS: You can use the S key in iD to make building have right angled corners, which is more accurate. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-26 13:32 | Nirhaunz ♦1 | Thank you rorym! I'm new to OSM and it's always good to get tips :) | |
| 4 | 2017-10-26 13:45 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | No problem! That's what the "request a review" feature is for. We all mistakes at the start. (Oh lord, you should see some of the stuff I did at the start!) Keep on mapping! | |
| 53214789 by Nirhaunz @ 2017-10-24 17:45 | 1 | 2017-10-25 10:25 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Another review! Same as last changeset, pretty good over all, good first start.You've added 2 buildings ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534937086 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534937084 ) which are overlapping, this nearly always a mistake. If they don't touch or overhang e... |
| 53209675 by Nirhaunz @ 2017-10-24 14:15 | 1 | 2017-10-25 10:23 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review of this edit, so here it is!It looks pretty good. iD has a way to "make a building more rectangular" by pressing the S key. Most builings in the real world have right angles, so this makes the buildings you add more realistic.You added a few b... |
| 53193587 by BailysCorner @ 2017-10-23 23:19 | 1 | 2017-10-25 10:15 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review, so here it is. This looks great! I'm not local to Tralee, so I can't check it's there, but I trust you. It's great that you added lots of details, like phone number, postcode, and address data. Keep it up!One note: The "operator" tag shouldn&... |
| 53060936 by mircozorzo @ 2017-10-19 08:21 | 1 | 2017-10-21 16:35 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review of this, so here it is. You've put name=Main St., when the street should be expanded, but you fixed that later. So all good. 👍 |
| 2 | 2017-10-23 16:43 | mircozorzo ♦23 | Thank you! | |
| 53060689 by mircozorzo @ 2017-10-19 08:06 | 1 | 2017-10-21 16:31 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You asked for a review of this, but this looks good. tourism tag is better than the bodgy amentiy |
| 52318833 by DLOK @ 2017-09-24 02:41 | 1 | 2017-10-19 10:28 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Hi DLOK,you imported lots of unconnected sidewalks in this import. I am writing you because I emailed to the imports mailing list and have asked some other users who participated in this import to pause the import and fix all errors. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-October... |
| 2 | 2017-10-19 16:49 | mikelmaron ♦34 | @Nakaner -- You are not in position to demand fixes and threaten reverts. We do not deal with each other in this way in our community -- we work with each other to make a better map, in good faith. From what I can see, your concerns are understood, discussion is happening, and things are moving.If... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-19 21:27 | DLOK ♦1 | Hmm.. clarify: The direction given at the time was only to check these lines against aerial imagery ensuring they represent sidewalks, and not getting onto roadways and ends at where sidewalks end (thus they would not be necessary connected); then import them. This was based on verbal directions and... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-20 09:14 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi @DLOK, it's always good to get feedback from what people were were advised. Yes the OSM database is used for many things, rendering the map, and making routing/navigation. Some of the things you added here can break that, which is what Nakaner is referring to. It's probably good to ensu... | |
| 53039432 by rovena123 @ 2017-10-18 13:16 | 1 | 2017-10-18 14:57 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hello! And welcome to OSM! I'm rorym, one of the active OSMers from Ireland, and I see you requested a review of this change, so here we go!Overall it's very good. 👍 You've added houses that were missing, and included details that we can't get from aerial imagery, like add... |
| 52972350 by Md Atikuzzaman Limon @ 2017-10-16 06:09 | 1 | 2017-10-17 11:44 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You requested a review, so here it is! Similar to other edits this is perfectly fine and correct.Using a building=barn here (it looks like a barn) makes the map better than just building=yes. There are a few other buildings around which you didn't map. While you're in an area, why not ... |
| 51444177 by Cathal McNally @ 2017-08-25 20:08 | 1 | 2017-10-17 09:45 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! welcome to OSM! This townland is already mapped here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5646669 ), so I've removed the area you added (this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518659728 ), in this changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53006146 ).I'll explain m... |
| 52986637 by Md Atikuzzaman Limon @ 2017-10-16 16:22 | 1 | 2017-10-17 08:46 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Review requested, so here we go. You've improved the barn as per last feedback! so yay! All good. |
| 52972344 by Md Atikuzzaman Limon @ 2017-10-16 06:08 | 1 | 2017-10-16 12:48 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You requested a review of this. Similar to last time ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52972340 ), this is a perfectly fine edit. 🙂 Welcome to OSM, and keep up the good work! 👍Likewise, if you used a more specific building value, that would be better. This looks like a house, so &q... |
| 52972340 by Md Atikuzzaman Limon @ 2017-10-16 06:07 | 1 | 2017-10-16 12:45 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You requested a review. This looks good. Nothing wrong here. You could do things better in future. There are some other buildings to the right of that building which you could map as well. You have tagged this as "building=yes", which isn't *wrong*, but it looks like a barn to me,... |
| 52823320 by cw1985 @ 2017-10-11 12:25 | 1 | 2017-10-13 12:20 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi cw1985! Welcome to OSM! I notice you asked for a review of this changeset. You added the CoCo building, that looks fine.I'm not sure what's going on with Land of the Giants. From the description, it's a walk, around the pond? If so, you shouldn't tag it as a `leisure=park`... |
| 52813708 by Pavel80 @ 2017-10-11 07:16 | 1 | 2017-10-13 12:13 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi Pavel80! Welcome to OSM! I noticed you requested a review of this edit. This looks good! 👍Two things: (i) In this changeset you have spelled the building as "Old quarry", but to the right/west of it is "Old Quarry". Surely they both should have the capital Q?(ii) Yo... |
| 46778349 by geozeisig @ 2017-03-12 06:40 | 1 | 2017-10-11 13:29 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, You have changed the name to "Grianán von Aileach", but that's a German name. I don't think that's it's actual name...Hallo. Du hast die Name zu "Grianán von Aileach" geandert, aber das ist eine deutsche Name. Ich glaube, dass das nicht i... |
| 2 | 2017-10-11 15:48 | geozeisig ♦224 | Ich habe es korrigiert. Ich hoffe es ist so OK sonst ändere es bitte. | |
| 50144754 by Eduardo Concha Villarroel @ 2017-07-09 06:06 | 1 | 2017-09-18 11:35 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, you added a bus station *inside* Croke Park??? That can't be right. Where's the bus station really? |
| 2 | 2017-09-19 08:28 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I'm sorry, I've deleted this node. It doesn't make sense for there to be a bus station here.You can see some more comments on this note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1144365 | |
| 34933959 by ceedebee @ 2015-10-28 19:09 | 1 | 2017-09-19 08:08 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You added a caravan site ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3807169645 ), but the `tourism=caravan_site` should only be used for real, proper caravan sites. Not places you can park you caravan.I've deleted it here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52166391 ) because it's ... |
| 51519367 by OSM-Esel @ 2017-08-28 19:06 | 1 | 2017-09-19 08:08 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You modified a caravan site ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3807169645 ), but the `tourism=caravan_site` should only be used for real, proper caravan sites. Not places you can park you caravan.I've deleted it here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52166391 ) because it'... |
| 4789399 by pjna @ 2010-05-24 01:52 | 1 | 2017-07-24 09:14 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | "Tir Na Nog"? Shouldn't that be "Tir na nOg"? |
| 2 | 2017-07-24 09:19 | pjna ♦4 | When surveyed, it said Tir Na Nog on the outside, so that's what I went with. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-24 10:21 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Fair point. Sounds like the pub needs to brush up on their Irish orthography! | |
| 50050181 by Fa7C0N @ 2017-07-05 06:35 | 1 | 2017-07-05 08:10 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Are you *sure* this is a soccer field?? You've just added a note ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1053405 ) which says this is called "Renard GAA", if it's GAA then it's *not* soccer?If you're willing to add the sport=soccer field without local knowledge, then w... |
| 2 | 2017-07-05 09:31 | Fa7C0N ♦26 | Hi rorym,I added "soccer" to this field because I got a feedback from one of our user stating the name of the field is "Renard Gaa football field". Since, the field have 'Goal posts' on either side I added "soccer" to the pitch. I have never known about &q... | |
| 3 | 2017-07-05 09:38 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | The name is probably "Renard GAA", though that's almost just a description, I dunno. Be careful about editing in country where you don't know the local culture. :) | |
| 4 | 2017-07-05 11:51 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | FTR, we've been using the sport=gaelic_games for the sport value of GAA facilites https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dgaelic_games | |
| 49766801 by Joxit @ 2017-06-23 10:06 | 1 | 2017-06-23 13:06 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Ummm.... Why are you adding sqkm tag? If you need to know the area of a country you can just do a geographic calculation? Have you checked the the values you entered match the currently mapped areas? What happens if there is a difference? |
| 41398327 by brianh @ 2016-08-11 21:22 Active block | 1 | 2017-06-17 19:03 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | This church ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436786441 ) in the graveyard looks like a ruin.... so it shouldn't be tagged building=yes & amenity=place_of_worship.Likewise the corner of the graveyard is tagged a place_of_worship, is that right? |
| 12931542 by Deanna Earley @ 2012-08-31 14:14 | 1 | 2017-06-15 13:16 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. Now that we have better imagery, I've moved this building to what looks like the only building nearby. I did it in this changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49562361 ), and created this building ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500701959#map=19/51.89361/-9.86837 ). If I di... |
| 2 | 2017-06-15 17:04 | Deanna Earley ♦44 | Looks good, thanks! | |
| 37619575 by VictorIE @ 2016-03-05 00:41 | 1 | 2017-06-14 13:49 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I don't think that's a soccer pitch, I've changed it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49527802 |
| 9221155 by mackerski @ 2011-09-05 19:29 | 1 | 2017-06-13 13:25 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | This building ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1424371670 ) appears to be in the middle of a field and near a farm |
| 2 | 2017-06-13 14:16 | mackerski ♦34 | The change set appears to relate to some old ODbL cleanup. I may have done a tagging fix or something on this node, but I have no knowledge of the POI itself. I do see buildings nearby that are consistent with the label, but I'm not prepared to move the node without a real source. I have added ... | |
| 26033008 by pf_irl @ 2014-10-12 19:04 | 1 | 2017-06-02 08:33 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You added this way here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307485161 ) as a tunnel. That's weird. I can't see any tunnel there on Bing aerial. Are you sure that's right? |
| 37696001 by ConalHanamy @ 2016-03-08 21:24 | 1 | 2017-05-29 11:18 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You have added lots of houses on this stretch of the road with the addr:housenumber=Shinrone. Is that correct? addr:housename is the tag to use if the house has a name, not a number. Do all this houses have the same name?? |
| 21118914 by DOF Factory @ 2014-03-15 15:28 | 1 | 2017-05-26 12:12 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. Why did you add a (Y) to the end of the name for the library? ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58217608#map=19/53.38421/-6.25459&layers=N ) |
| 19175106 by PierceyUK @ 2013-11-29 09:45 | 1 | 2017-05-18 09:34 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. I'm not sure what the little area here is ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248976665 ), but I've removed it because it didn't make much sense |
| 30209979 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2015-04-14 12:01 | 1 | 2017-05-15 18:47 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | I'm guessing that "ref=route" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338384368/history is a mistagging, but I've no idea what the correct tagging should be there :( |
| 2 | 2017-05-16 09:36 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Yes that's incorrect. The Beara Way is a long distance hiking route around this pennisula ( http://www.irishtrails.ie/trail/Beara-Way/3/ ), So it should be tagged as that | |
| 3 | 2019-11-09 01:57 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | (stumbled on this again after writing a diary entry) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338384368/history is the tertiary road though - presumably the ref on that should be "L" somethingorother? | |
| 48514691 by density52 @ 2017-05-08 21:12 | 1 | 2017-05-12 12:21 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Is this riverbank correct? It doesn't look like the river is that large in the aerial imagery.... |
| 2 | 2017-05-12 12:53 | density52 ♦1 | Yes, this is correct. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-12 12:54 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | The OSM wiki guidelines for `waterway=riverbank` imply that there should be water there. But I can't see much on the aerial? It looks like there's grass there.... What am I missing? | |
| 4 | 2017-05-12 13:00 | density52 ♦1 | I have visited the location and there is water. The aerial image must be old. | |
| 14099952 by redwolf1219 @ 2012-11-30 15:05 | 1 | 2017-05-12 12:24 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Ummm... I don't think this ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178568122#map=19/35.14644/-85.27930 ) is a castle, I've changed it here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48622632#map=6/32.559/-90.407 ) |
| 19293521 by Daniel Jeffries @ 2013-12-05 18:01 | 1 | 2017-05-12 12:14 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi , you mapped lots of little campsites around here, But are they all separate? Or are they all part of one big campsite? |
| 27285914 by Stalfur @ 2014-12-06 09:34 | 1 | 2017-05-11 11:54 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. I noticed you added Martin's Castle. You tagged it as `historic=castle`, however I've undone that ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48589873 ) because `historic=castle` is supposed to be for things that were used a long time ago as fortifications, not just things that /look/ li... |
| 22723349 by ChrisBessert @ 2014-06-03 21:15 | 1 | 2017-05-11 11:45 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! I notice you've changed some of the railways so that they are tagged `historic=Chesapeake and Ohio Railway`, but that's not the correct usage of the `historic` tag, right? What are you trying to map here? Is the old name "Chesapeake and Ohio Railway" or something? |
| 35219384 by Mr UMM @ 2015-11-10 16:14 | 1 | 2017-05-11 08:23 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, This looks like an import? What's up with the Red/Green/Blue tags you have added to many objects (e.g. here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5654088 )? That doesn't look like real data/real tags |
| 41909576 by dwatling @ 2016-09-04 14:59 | 1 | 2017-05-02 11:54 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Is the node ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4383812974#map=18/42.41104/-88.53767 ) really a castle? Should it be tagged that way if it's not a real castle? |
| 2 | 2017-05-02 13:39 | dwatling ♦4 | No. It is not a real castle even though it is referred to as such. I don't recall deliberately tagging this place as a castle. I'll remove the tag. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-02 13:49 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Cool. Yes, just because something is called a "castle" doesn't mean it fits `historic=castle`. e.g. the 'castle' at Disneyland is probably not a real castle.Is it a hotel/guesthouse? Maybe tag it as that? If not you could just add the `name=Somerset` tag to the building ... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-02 13:51 | dwatling ♦4 | It is just a private residence. Would having a named "point" be good enough? Or would it be better to name the shape? | |
| 5 | 2017-05-02 14:00 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Well, let's get philosophical. *What* is "Somerset"? Is it just the building? then add the name tag to the building. Is the whole residential area called Somerset? Then you could draw a `landuse=residential` and add a name tag to that. | |
| 6 | 2017-05-02 14:13 | dwatling ♦4 | It is just the building. I'll go ahead and add it there.Thanks! | |
| 7 | 2017-05-02 14:23 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | 🙌 😀 Yay for improving the map | |
| 46536933 by Roy Sigman @ 2017-03-03 01:22 | 1 | 2017-05-02 11:56 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! I don't think this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4714336589#map=17/37.13085/-92.10311 ) is really a castle, so I've removed it... |
| 48233200 by King David @ 2017-04-28 16:17 | 1 | 2017-05-02 11:53 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! I noticed you added a few things, which I don't think are 100% correct.... You appear to have tagged your house as a castle. I've remove that here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48332958 ) because when we use `historic=castle` we want that to mean an actual c... |
| 47540796 by paulatthehug @ 2017-04-07 14:04 | 1 | 2017-04-10 19:11 | SK53 ♦864 | We're a bit puzzled by these edits. Boundaries are more or less entirely mapped with relations (and particularly so in Ireland), so there is no need to add the tags to constituent ways. In fact doing so can affect how the map appears as the boundary line may be drawn twice. In case you have... |
| 2 | 2017-04-10 19:29 | paulatthehug ♦9 | Indeed the boundary is defined by relations and that certainly works for the default OSM rendering which includes showing it at sea, which we didn't want for the tiles we are building.So we tried using the tags for a national boundary (boundary=administrative, admin_level=2 as per the wiki)... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-10 19:47 | SK53 ♦864 | Please don't do this sort of thing: it's called tagging for the renderer. There are plenty of ways of rendering the boundary only inland (which I assume is what you want to do) without altering the tagging.At the very least you need to discuss this with the Irish OSM community at the t... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-10 19:57 | paulatthehug ♦9 | Well, it's also called inconsistency in tagging (and not as per the wiki either).And, just to be clear, I didn't start it: I reckon about 75% of the border was already tagged boundary=administrative, admin_level=2 before I began, unsurprisingly really as that's what the wiki says we... | |
| 5 | 2017-04-10 20:15 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | So there are many ways to solve the "country borders in the sea" issue. Paul Norman has written osmborder ( https://github.com/pnorman/osmborder ) software which allows you to extract the borders as linestrings and will mark if a border is maritine or not. Instead of drawing a blue map an... | |
| 6 | 2017-04-10 20:17 | paulatthehug ♦9 | Thanks for your comments. I'm about to post on talk-ie about this as it's "their" border. | |
| 7 | 2017-04-10 20:41 | SK53 ♦864 | talk-ie covers the island: the townlands project, vice counties project and no doubt others have been island wide too.I'd presume ways with admin_level=2 may even pre-date the use of relations for boundaries. Around 2009 tags on the way was still a common approach. Until relatively recently... | |
| 45604798 by scoty @ 2017-01-28 21:40 | 1 | 2017-03-22 12:59 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there! You've added a few duplicate nodes in this (and other changesets) in this area. I'm not sure how it happens. But it means there are nodes right on top of each other. I'm fixing them up with JOSM. It's no biggie. |
| 2 | 2017-03-22 13:37 | scoty ♦1 | While there were duplicates in these changesets, these were cause by self-intersections which have all since been fixed. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-22 13:52 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I was thinking of examples like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4672356418/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4672356419/history (which were actually in another changeset). :) | |
| 4 | 2017-03-22 14:20 | scoty ♦1 | Ah cool, that makes more sense! Thanks for fixing those! :) | |
| 5 | 2017-03-22 14:31 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | No probemo! :) | |
| 46350947 by great mind @ 2017-02-23 22:10 | 1 | 2017-03-09 13:53 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! I notice you've added some roads here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476753044#map=18/7.25729/5.22783 ) . Be sure to tag the way to record that it's a road. Don't just leave it untagged! :) |
| 35273067 by Conormap @ 2015-11-12 22:10 | 1 | 2017-03-07 10:41 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. I notice you adeded a lot of `natural=bare_rock` areas here. You state that the source is Mapbox Satellite. However I can't see any rocks in this area on that imagery. It just all looks like forest/woods to me. Is there another Mapbox satellite source you used, or the default one in JOSM? M... |
| 2 | 2017-03-07 16:20 | Conormap ♦10 | Hi Rory. What brings another Irish user of OSM to this part of Mada? I can see the bare rock formations quite clearly on both the Mapbox and Bing satellite images. The reason I used Mapbox's version was for the higher contrast between bare rock and vegetation, which aided tracing.Have you bee... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-07 16:28 | Conormap ♦10 | I should note that there are some succulents and underlying vegetation that appear in small parts of the satellite photos of the rock areas. When traversing the area on foot they appear in some large crevices under the surface level, growing upwards to find light, having wound their way out of a cra... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-07 17:52 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I'm doing Jochen Topf's Area fixing maproulette challenges ( http://area.jochentopf.com/fixing.html ), and one of the highlighted topology errors was here.No, I've never been to the area, so I'll defer to your local knowledge. It looks like I was misreading the aerial imagery... | |
| 5 | 2017-03-07 18:28 | Conormap ♦10 | You're probably very familiar with the Burren, so you'd have an idea of the geology of the Tsingy. They're both large areas of limestone that have eroded into unusual shapes over time. The Tsingy eroded far more drastically than the Burren but vegetation has found its way in small num... | |
| 6 | 2017-03-09 13:08 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Cool. That makes sense. Maybe that's why I didn't see anything on the aerial imagery | |
| 45430028 by Ashryn @ 2017-01-24 11:14 | 1 | 2017-03-09 12:39 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! I notice you added 2 picnic areas ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46708390 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468315804 ) in this change. You added a name of "picnic shelter" and "Free Barbeques". I hope you don't mind, but I removed those names ( in this c... |
| 30126979 by Jocro @ 2015-04-10 19:27 | 1 | 2017-03-08 09:57 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi there! I notice you mapped 2 things here, and I'm not sure it's correct. "Unused field" is that really it's *name*, or just the description? In OSM we use the `name` tag for the actual name. Likewise for the "Empty Field". You also didn't tag Empty field as... |
| 46496211 by VERCKEN @ 2017-03-01 14:48 | 1 | 2017-03-07 14:19 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Careful when adding buildings. You need to add the "building=yes" tag. You can't just leave it as "area=yes" |
| 46485655 by moses kitwi @ 2017-03-01 06:23 | 1 | 2017-03-07 14:16 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. I've changed some of your mapping of buildings in this changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46653143 ). You had a building tagged as a mulitpolygon relation with a outer and inner role. This means you're mapping a building with a hole. I don't think this is the case... |
| 46437926 by esunget @ 2017-02-27 10:06 | 1 | 2017-03-07 14:09 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Careful with the duplicate buildings here. You have a few buildings on top of each other. The JOSM validator flags this as an error before upload, maybe have a look at those errors before uploading? |
| 25310512 by SeanT_01 @ 2014-09-08 16:06 | 1 | 2017-03-07 13:40 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. In this changeset you added exactly the same buildings as you did in ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25264593 ). they are exactly on top of the others! How did you manage that? I've deleted these new overlapping buildings in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/4... |
| 46417481 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2017-02-26 14:53 | 1 | 2017-02-28 20:18 | OscarBrownbread ♦5 | ...and we should change name = "Knock (Costello portion)" to just "Knock Civil Parish" right? |
| 2 | 2017-03-01 09:01 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Yes! I forgot to do that there. You could call it "Knock" or "Knock Civil Parish". | |
| 46337978 by Dafo43 @ 2017-02-23 13:06 | 1 | 2017-02-24 11:49 | Vincent de Phily ♦112 | Howdy :)Be careful with your boundary edits : you're leaving a trail of unclosed rings and role-less members (I'm just after fixing a few in bray/greystones).You can view some of the issues (various levels of importance) at http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-6.2229... |
| 2 | 2017-02-24 12:02 | Dafo43 ♦31 | Well yes, mistakes do get made, that's going to happen, wouldn't it be better to check this after a few days though? All the boundaries in Wicklow are currently fixed. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-24 14:41 | Vincent de Phily ♦112 | Sorry, didn't mean to rush things. I commented using this recent changeset but the first breakage I looked at was a few days old. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4167050 (just one example found via OSMI) is a boundary in Wicklow edited 7 days ago and still broken.Making mistakes is p... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-24 14:51 | Dafo43 ♦31 | Don't get me wrong, appreciate someone else is checking also. I do go back and check after, but sometimes you have to let the map catch up to easily spot mistakes. I'm pretty much finished with Wicklow for now anyway. Good spot on the townland, it still works as a boundary but it'... | |
| 5 | 2017-02-24 15:15 | Vincent de Phily ♦112 | All good :) I've been working away at OSMI's area checks for a few days, I hope to get Ireland all cleaned up, Wicklow and all.Note that the osm2pgsql devs have announced their intent to become a bit stricter in the polygon errors that they auto-correct (https://lists.openstreetmap.org... | |
| 6 | 2017-02-24 15:38 | Dafo43 ♦31 | OSM Inspector is useful alright, maybe a bit slow to update but it is very good for pointing out mistakes, thanks for the link.I'm fixing the boundaries of townlands based on this data - http://maps.openstreetmap.ie/os_opendata.html , comparing OSM and OSI. There are still a good few townla... | |
| 7 | 2017-02-27 09:09 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | One thing about the OSi townlands: they are simplified/generalised to 20m "resoltuion", so OSM can easily be better/more accurate | |
| 8 | 2017-02-27 09:15 | Dafo43 ♦31 | Sure, I'm not expecting to get anything perfect, just take out the obvious mistakes in townlands (some of which are my own). It's not a case of just redrawing the OSI data, I'm using it to point to mistakes then use the townland maps and Bing imagery to make the changes.Some townl... | |
| 9 | 2017-02-27 09:31 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Sure., So long as you're aware that the OSi data isn't gospel! 👍🙂 | |
| 10 | 2017-02-27 09:36 | Dafo43 ♦31 | Definitely not, just an extra reference point :) | |
| 42896415 by Arif Khan11 @ 2016-10-14 13:29 | 1 | 2017-02-22 09:05 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. You've added a very large building here: ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447695198 ). Is this really one large building? |
| 40714040 by Stephen_Co_Antrim @ 2016-07-13 14:42 | 1 | 2017-02-19 12:25 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | How come you've aded 3 different CPs? Shouldn't there only be one, Drummaul. What's going on with the little ones likw "Drummail/Antrim"? It's not in Logainm, and the Memorial Atlas maps imply it's not a separate CP |
| 36792926 by Crowley121 @ 2016-01-25 10:24 | 1 | 2017-02-17 16:24 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You added the `opening_hours` to the Pizza Hut (here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3965636965 ). The OSM opening_hours has a strict, machine parsable format. You can use a tool like YoHours ( http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ ) draw in the hours and generate the OSM format. I did that here... |
| 33616104 by baraka101 @ 2015-08-27 09:56 | 1 | 2017-02-10 09:38 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! I notice you've mapped a few buildings on top of each other ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364470455 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364472804 ). Do you know about the JOSM validator? It can be used If it's just a simple mistake that's fine, just delete one of them.... |
| 33566765 by Lizy @ 2015-08-25 10:04 | 1 | 2017-02-10 09:31 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! 🙂 I wonder if I can ask one thing about some of the buildings you have added here. Sometimes you have added a node inside a building with the same `shop` tag. e.g. This building ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364483936 ) is tagged `shop=greengrocer`, but inside it, there's this stan... |
| 33494507 by saketg @ 2015-08-21 21:32 | 1 | 2017-02-09 13:25 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contributions here. :) Just one minor point, I notice that several of you were editing at the same time, and 3 of you have been editing at the same place, and yous each have put the same building at the same time. Maybe in future don't edit the same area at e... |
| 33494627 by tallasif85 @ 2015-08-21 21:36 | 1 | 2017-02-09 13:25 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contributions here. :) Just one minor point, I notice that several of you were editing at the same time, and 3 of you have been editing at the same place, and yous each have put the same building at the same time. Maybe in future don't edit the same area at e... |
| 33494939 by Chris Lam @ 2015-08-21 21:46 | 1 | 2017-02-09 13:25 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contributions here. :) Just one minor point, I notice that several of you were editing at the same time, and 3 of you have been editing at the same place, and yous each have put the same building at the same time. Maybe in future don't edit the same area at e... |
| 45830957 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2017-02-05 14:48 | 1 | 2017-02-05 20:56 | cRaIgalLAn ♦18 | Thank you rorym, for noticing and repairing the errors - the power of crowd-sourcing is demonstrated again. I'm glad you were working in the area - Kenya is badly undermapped. |
| 2 | 2017-02-06 08:46 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | No problem! 🙂 We all have to chip in, and we can make things better | |
| 30404860 by omino @ 2015-04-22 13:57 | 1 | 2017-02-05 15:23 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | In this edit you added some untagged nodes. I've removed there here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45831785 ). |
| 9703860 by Tatu @ 2011-10-31 14:17 | 1 | 2017-02-05 15:23 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! In this edit you added some untagged nodes. I've removed there here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45831785 ). If you have an questions about OSM, just ask. :) |
| 29777051 by omino @ 2015-03-27 13:05 | 1 | 2016-06-07 12:05 | mikelmaron ♦34 | Hi MaureenMany of the "brownfield" features mapped around Bamba are probably not appropriate for OpenStreetMap. They appear to be "service areas" for various things like schools and water points. Is that right? Let's talk soon about how we can clean this data up, so that O... |
| 2 | 2017-01-31 08:50 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! are you sure about all those [brownfield](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=brownfield?uselang=en-IE) sites? They don't look like much. Those names look a little off as well.. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-05 14:50 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I've removed those "brownfield" sites, since they don't seem to be brownfields at all. If you have any questions, let me know. 🙂https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45830486 | |
| 4 | 2017-02-05 14:53 | mikelmaron ♦34 | thanks @rorym | |
| 5 | 2023-12-23 08:43 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 | Hello! And sorry for bothering you about an ancient edit, but I run into it and have some doubts.@omino - what is the point of status:operational_status=operational for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3421461750 ?If it would not be operational it would not be tagged as amenity=hospital ?\... | |
| 6 | 2024-01-04 09:47 | mikelmaron ♦34 | Hey Mateusz -- I can speak to the tagging, as it was developed by Map Kibera. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operational_status has details on operational_status. It was set up prior to the lifecycle tagging coming into place. Similar with toilet.This tagging could be updated to those s... | |
| 7 | 2024-01-04 19:46 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 | yes, https://codeberg.org/matkoniecz/OpenStreetMap_cleanup_scripts/src/branch/master/recurrent_bot_edits has draft of bot edit that will partially fix ithttps://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-inactive-water-wells-man-made-water-well-disused-yes-vs-disused-man-made-water-well/97827 is one ... | |
| 32073321 by cRaIgalLAn @ 2015-06-19 11:52 | 1 | 2017-02-05 14:49 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! I fixed up (here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45830957 ) some of the rivers you mapped. You had 2 rivers crossing, but it's better if you join the OSM 'way' together |
| 42655056 by Gabriele4x @ 2016-10-05 11:30 | 1 | 2017-01-28 12:00 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! I think 3 of you were mapping this area at the same time ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42655091 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42654784 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42655056 ) and yous added lots of overlapping buildings (which I removed here https://www.openstree... |
| 42654784 by Blazestorm16 @ 2016-10-05 11:17 | 1 | 2017-01-28 12:00 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! I think 3 of you were mapping this area at the same time ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42655091 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42654784 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42655056 ) and yous added lots of overlapping buildings (which I removed here https://www.openstree... |
| 42655091 by radivaTY1234 @ 2016-10-05 11:31 | 1 | 2017-01-28 12:00 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! I think 3 of you were mapping this area at the same time ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42655091 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42654784 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42655056 ) and yous added lots of overlapping buildings (which I removed here https://www.openstree... |
| 25445890 by idnoc @ 2014-09-15 02:48 | 1 | 2017-01-25 09:49 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! I notice in this edit that you added lots of coastal details (👍), however some of the mapping is a little confusing to me. You have some areas which overlap completely and are tagged differently. e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303267379 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303395670... |
| 14721319 by JoergB @ 2013-01-20 14:58 | 1 | 2017-01-17 09:24 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! You've added name=Athlone to all the little piers at Athlone (e.g. this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202136127 ). Is that accurate? Is the name of that pier "Athlone"? |
| 2 | 2017-01-17 19:11 | JoergB ♦1 | Hi rorym, I'm not sure if this is the right name. If you have a better you can modify it | |
| 3 | 2017-01-18 08:54 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I'm not local, so I'm not sure if they have a name. I'm half tempted to delete them, since I think those little piers wouldn't be named. | |
| 4 | 2017-01-18 11:00 | JoergB ♦1 | I'm also not local. If you like you can delete them. | |
| 43108999 by michalzz @ 2016-10-23 20:35 | 1 | 2017-01-16 20:57 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! It's great to add lots of landuse stuff. It really makes the map more filled out. However you've added a lot of untagged ways on top of the landuse areas you've added. |
| 2 | 2017-01-16 21:15 | michalzz ♦1 | Those untagged ways are walls. I will be correcting them soon. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-17 09:03 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I saw that you had lots tagged of ways as walls. And they are still there. It's just that you had ways which were overlapping on top of them.I've deleted them last night, sorry! I hope it's OK. There are still loads of walls there. | |
| 4 | 2017-01-17 10:49 | michalzz ♦1 | No worries about that. I will be removing those walls in short period of time. | |
| 5 | 2017-01-17 13:01 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Why remove the walls? There are plenty of walls and hedges and stuff mapped in OSM, why not keep them? You can see them from the aerial imagery (though they look a little like hedges to me). | |
| 22545191 by fitzsij @ 2014-05-25 15:30 | 1 | 2017-01-17 12:32 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! I've been looking at this area. I've fixed up the tagging of St. Mary's, I wonder if you wanna give it a once over and add some more information? |
| 10874908 by J_omcc @ 2012-03-04 22:44 | 1 | 2017-01-14 12:21 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! In this changeset you added lots of buildings in Marian Avenue/Place ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/10874908#map=18/53.02922/-7.30670), and many of the buildings overlapped. I've cleaned it up now. Do you know about the JOSM terracer and building utils plugsin? :) |
| 40754913 by Za Ra Velji @ 2016-07-15 07:08 | 1 | 2017-01-09 10:49 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Wellcome to OpenStreetMap! I see you've added a lot of viewpoints. Are you sure those are view points? I've briefly been there and I can't remember anything that looked like a true viewpoint like that. |
| 29274479 by Chanamon @ 2015-03-05 19:36 | 1 | 2017-01-08 10:21 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OSM! Thanks for adding lots of details in this area. Just one thing, be careful with the "name" tag. You shouldn't say "name=Grass" for just a grassy area. The landuse=grass is enough to record that the area is grass. You should only use the "name" f... |
| 40785116 by jswat @ 2016-07-16 18:29 | 1 | 2017-01-08 10:14 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | You've added a building=yes to a node inside another building! Your "building node" has name=Multiroofing, but the building area it's inside is has name="Old Artesyn building". Are you trying to say that the name is "Multiroofing"? or what? |
| 42184925 by LateNightTone @ 2016-09-15 19:31 | 1 | 2017-01-05 08:49 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | HI! I notice you changed the name of the Civil Parish from Derryaghy to Derriaghy ( this one relation 6,420,835 ). Are you sure about the name? On the old historical maps ( http://maps.openstreetmap.ie/oocmaps.html?zoom=13&lat=54.56112&lon=-6.08202&layers=0000BFFFTFF ) it's spelled... |
| 41944686 by soapynoscopy @ 2016-09-06 02:28 | 1 | 2016-12-17 10:23 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! I've made some changes to some of the mapped grassy areas you did here. I changed from rec ground to grass. And added a few little bits of footpath since you /can/ walk there. :) Hope that's OK |
| 2 | 2016-12-17 19:49 | soapynoscopy ♦1 | Hell yeah dude! | |
| 44464780 by Dublin Crimewatch Retail Radio System @ 2016-12-17 09:01 | 1 | 2016-12-17 10:07 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed your edit, and I've fixed up the node you added. I'm pretty sure your shop isn't a a fast food joint! :) So I removed that. :)If you have any questions, feel free to ask! |
| 44381869 by piligab @ 2016-12-13 20:12 | 1 | 2016-12-15 10:09 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. Thanks for your interest in Irish Townlands. However it looks like your edit has actually broken a valid relation, because you removed a way from the relation. I have reverted this changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44419224 |
| 2 | 2016-12-19 14:54 | piligab ♦60 | Hi rory.I'm not sure how this happened, maybe I could have confused any tags and deleted. I will be careful about my future editions. Thanks for your feedback. | |
| 41481767 by Brendan O'Sullivan @ 2016-08-16 04:42 | 1 | 2016-08-16 09:07 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Thanks for your interest in OSM. It looks like you've added your address to OSM, that's great, we need more addresses. However you've categorised it as a hotel, which I suspect is not what you want. Are you open for business as a hotel? Do you want people to be turning up looking ... |
| 41419931 by DomenecSC @ 2016-08-12 22:23 | 1 | 2016-08-13 13:45 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I have undo this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41429901 since the name tag isn't for that |
| 41001116 by Keenan Kennedy @ 2016-07-25 00:59 | 1 | 2016-07-25 13:37 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi! Thanks for your interest in OSM. However Pokestops don't belong in OSM. We're tying to make a map of the world based on what's actually there. I'm afraid Pokestops don't count as tourism attractions (which you've mapped them as). |
| 2 | 2016-07-25 16:05 | Polarbear ♦941 | In addition to the 7 new objects, one real memorial was renamed. Reverted in CS 41015995. | |
| 39959296 by hanzlan @ 2016-06-11 19:39 | 1 | 2016-06-22 12:56 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I've undone this change ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40204565 ), because the name of the country is `Ireland`, not `Éire - Ireland`, which is a combination of both languages. Yes, Ireland has 2 official languages, but you don't see them mixed together like this. The vas... |
| 2 | 2016-07-04 21:14 | hanzlan ♦27 | Hey! I guess you are used and annoyed of people changing the name of the country into Éire and of course sorry for that. Yes, I know Irish has become something like Latin, a language rarely heard in daily life, but not to bury it completely, shouldn't we add it to Ireland, so we can keep... | |
| 3 | 2016-07-05 08:29 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I'm not annoyed about this, I think it basically never happens. ☺ (We've had more problems with Londonderry/Derry TBH).We do have the Irish name in the OSM object, in the `name:ga` tag (we also have English in the `name:en`). `name` should be for the single most commonly used name, a... | |
| 36438300 by Mumbambu @ 2016-01-08 05:11 | 1 | 2016-01-08 10:39 | MCDA ♦112 | I dont see the confusion, the name is either Derry or Londonderry, people can choose which they want to use. Please revert the name change to Londonderry. |
| 2 | 2016-01-08 10:59 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi Mumbambu. Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your interest in the Ireland, however please be cautious of taking a side on such a complex issue. The dual name solves a lot of problems. Like many things in OSM there are many correct answers to the question of "What is the official name?"... | |
| 3 | 2016-01-08 11:02 | MCDA ♦112 | Maybe it is worth studying that the local council serving the area refer to themselves as Derry City Council, see their website here - http://www.derrystrabane.com/Services/Contact-UsYou can also read lots of very interesting history regarding the naming dispute here - https://en.wikipedia.org/w... | |
| 4 | 2016-06-02 00:00 | Mumbambu ♦1 | https://www.courtsni.gov.uk/en-GB/Judicial%20Decisions/PublishedByYear/Documents/2007/2007%20NIQB%205/j_j_WEAF5707.htmAlso sorry for mixing edits of two different two different edits. At the time I did not sure how to edit properly. | |
| 5 | 2016-06-02 12:07 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | The name tag in OSM is not the "official"/"legal" name. | |
| 6 | 2016-06-02 12:53 | MCDA ♦112 | I don't understand why you felt the need to edit this node in the first place. The name includes the names it is known as locally. You also moved the node into the river which is totally wrong as well. | |
| 37062732 by Riggwelter @ 2016-02-07 16:23 | 1 | 2016-02-08 06:44 | ramyaragupathy ♦54 | Hello Riggwelter, Looks like the data you have deleted is for roads that are clearly visible in the imagery. Did you verify the accuracy of the data before deleting them? |
| 2 | 2016-02-09 11:05 | Riggwelter ♦7 | Yes. What's the point in adding like 25 m worth of access road, like the access to a garage in your yard? It just clutters the map. | |
| 3 | 2016-02-11 09:47 | ramyaragupathy ♦54 | @Riggwelter: Would like you to have a look at this page. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Micromapping | |
| 4 | 2016-02-11 10:09 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi Riggwelter. Thanks for your concern, but mapping driveways is helpful for OSM and is quite common. There are more than 2.5 million driveways mapped in OSM (service=driveway), from all over the world. ( http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway )Concern for how the map appears is ... | |
| 5 | 2016-02-12 22:57 | Riggwelter ♦7 | Thanks for your kind message, and above all, thanks for your explanation! I suppose I just need to revise my view on what OSM is - to me, having taken it at face value, it's a map and not a database. However, it does make sense to - also - call it a database, and that's how I will refer to... | |
| 6 | 2016-02-13 11:42 | MCDA ♦112 | Hi Riggwelter, OSM is definitely a database and a very powerful one at that! Did you know that the OSM Ireland have custom maps? You can see some of the maps we render here - http://www.openstreetmap.ie/resources/maps/This is an example using our Irish Language layer showing hill shadi... | |
| 35276959 by pattman @ 2015-11-13 06:07 | 1 | 2016-02-05 15:48 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. As cute as this is, this is almost certainly not accurate. OSM is a shared global map database, and we're trying to stick to things that actually exist please. |
| 35641086 by cRaIgalLAn @ 2015-11-29 07:00 | 1 | 2015-12-10 09:33 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi, what's going on here? This is almost certainly junk? |
| 2 | 2015-12-10 10:26 | cRaIgalLAn ♦18 | Perhaps its an Irish thing, but leaping into a discussion with a stranger by calling their work 'junk' is not constructive. It more like a good way to start a flame war or revive the 'troubles' online.The little test strip is very useful to me in coding up map features in Kenya... | |
| 25355900 by Boggedy @ 2014-09-10 20:21 | 1 | 2015-10-17 12:29 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Are you sure about the name:ga for http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3336165 ? ;) |
| 27958330 by fpopenoe @ 2015-01-06 15:22 | 1 | 2015-09-01 14:35 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Hi. I notice you've added a node called "Nkwansekwa Primary School", but you've tagged it as place=village. Is that totally right? Does the name of the village include "Primary School"? |
| 31053157 by nitrofurano @ 2015-05-12 12:50 | 1 | 2015-06-18 14:56 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | I'm skeptical that this is a real edit. I've heard of this "country" and the story behind it. But AFAIK it's not recognised by anyone, and no-one lives there or claims to be a citizen, right? Should this node not be deleted? |
| 2 | 2015-06-22 16:08 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | I've deleted it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32142156 - see the reasoning there. | |
| 31146084 by Stephen_Co_Antrim @ 2015-05-14 16:05 | 1 | 2015-05-17 14:15 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Is Aghanloo correct? ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5139679 ) It's tagged as a townland/admin_level=10, but it is quite large, and overlaps many other townlands. Is this, in reality, a Civil Parish? |
| 30804518 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2015-05-05 10:01 | 1 | 2015-05-05 20:06 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Eine Sprache reicht aus. :-) Welche du nimmst, ist deine Entscheidung. |
| 2 | 2015-05-06 09:04 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 | Danke. :) Ich will mein Deutch verbessern. |