| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45608038 by Glassman | 1 | 2018-05-23 22:34:10 UTC | Carnildo | And here we see the hazards of using sans-serif fonts. That was a capital 'i' in the street name, not a lowercase 'L'. |
| 59191333 by nhanway | 1 | 2018-05-23 04:49:52 UTC | Carnildo | I'm pretty sure Hill Airport still exists. The service road a bit to the west of the airport marker is a bit wider than normal for a farm access road, but it perfectly matches the FAA's description of the Hill Airport runway (mixed concrete and gravel, 1680 feet long, bearing 20 degrees magnetic. |
| 59132761 by rolwirth | 1 | 2018-05-21 02:39:55 UTC | Carnildo | You appear to have encountered a bit of terminology confusion here. OSM uses "dock" for the area of water the ship goes in, and "pier" for the thing you tie the ship to. I've fixed this up, but it's something to keep in mind in the future. |
| 59069700 by hofoen | 1 | 2018-05-19 00:01:15 UTC | Carnildo | I've reverted your changing of County Road 250 to a service road. Service roads don't normally extend for 15 miles, providing significant local access. |
| 58939541 by compdude | 1 | 2018-05-14 08:46:43 UTC | Carnildo | I think you've got a short-circuit in the roundabout: someone going from westbound Kennedy Road to northbound Webber Canyon Road won't get "take the first exit from the roundabout" in their driving directions. |
| 2 | 2018-05-14 14:36:20 UTC | compdude | Thanks for pointing this out; I just did an edit to fix this issue. | |
| 58860523 by Howpper | 1 | 2018-05-10 23:35:42 UTC | Carnildo | If you're going to be adjusting road geometry in Spokane County, please use the "Esri World Imagery" option. It's newer, sharper, and better-aligned than the Bing imagery. |
| 58812863 by The Bendell Law Firm | 1 | 2018-05-09 22:47:58 UTC | Carnildo | The 1100 west block of Park Place is somewhat to the southwest of where you added this. I've moved your business to my best guess for the correct location. |
| 58801524 by ItsMrBiG | 1 | 2018-05-08 23:14:55 UTC | Carnildo | If the businesses are no longer in operation, you should also remove the business-type tagging. Right now, the former Spirit and Food Mart will show up on the map as an unnamed gas station and convenience store. |
| 58713478 by Jfrandsen | 1 | 2018-05-05 19:36:08 UTC | Carnildo | The correct way to indicate that a golf course is private is to add the "access=private" tag, not to change what sort of thing it's tagged as. |
| 58635477 by mustang01 | 1 | 2018-05-03 07:29:31 UTC | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM! A few suggestions for better mapping:First, you can change the background imagery using the "Background settings" tab (the one that looks a little like three stacked sheets of paper). In the Spokane area, the "Esri World Imagery" option is far sharper than t... |
| 58629555 by CobaltScyne | 1 | 2018-05-03 07:10:22 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't add nonsense to the map. There's no shortage of real things you could map instead. |
| 58585217 by GrantRA | 1 | 2018-05-01 19:32:01 UTC | Carnildo | Did you make a mistake here? A cycleway that forbids bicycle usage strikes me as rather improbable. |
| 2 | 2018-05-01 19:35:44 UTC | GrantRA | Apologies, this was an incomplete edit and I will review further. This trailway is closed for construction until August. | |
| 58421536 by shawat94 | 1 | 2018-04-26 01:37:25 UTC | Carnildo | Is there a reason you deleted this driveway? |
| 2 | 2018-04-26 14:57:32 UTC | shawat94 | Hey Carnildo,Thanks for pointing this out! I accidentally removed this during a maproulette project that aims to clean up previously imported TIGER roads. I’m still a bit new to using OpenStreetMap, so I’ve reviewed tagging guidelines in the OSM wiki for driveways, as well as your ta... | |
| 58417916 by markm851003 | 1 | 2018-04-26 00:25:00 UTC | Carnildo | Could you please pay better attention to what you're doing? About half the object you tagged as an "unclassified road" is actually an intermittent stream, while the other half is a farm track. |
| 2 | 2018-04-27 05:16:19 UTC | markm851003 | Hello my mistake I will check into this and correct any incorrect modeling thank you for pointing this out. | |
| 58388148 by Bodhis3mta3 | 1 | 2018-04-25 01:54:32 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for adding that to the map.A tip for future editing: you can change the background imagery using the "Background Settings" tab (the one that looks a little like three stacked sheets of paper). In the Spokane County area, the "Esri World Imagery" option is far sharper ... |
| 58355618 by kfremd | 1 | 2018-04-24 05:26:44 UTC | Carnildo | When you're editing in Spokane County, *please* use ESRI World Imagery. It's far sharper and better-aligned than Bing, and I think it's slightly newer, as well. |
| 2 | 2018-04-24 15:15:38 UTC | kfremd | Thank you for the insight and suggestion! I will switch over to ESRI World Imagery for future edits in this area. | |
| 58333571 by Stelios Tachtatzis | 1 | 2018-04-23 21:41:50 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for your additions.In case you haven't noticed, you can change the background imagery in the "Background settings" tab (the one that looks sort of like three stacked sheets of paper). In the Spokane County area, the "Esri World Imagery" option is far sharper than the ... |
| 58153603 by archaeo | 1 | 2018-04-17 20:39:25 UTC | Carnildo | Are you sure the aerial photos here are correctly aligned? The images tend to get stretched in misleading ways in hilly areas.Looking at the available imagery options, about half of them say the old alignment was correct, while the other half agree with the new alignment. There aren't many GPS... |
| 58007570 by mapofshame_visitor | 1 | 2018-04-11 21:26:34 UTC | Carnildo | Whatever you're trying to do, it isn't working. You're adding payment information to things that aren't businesses, such as a random point on a road. |
| 57978041 by GITNE | 1 | 2018-04-10 20:49:22 UTC | Carnildo | Could you please be more careful in your editing? You dragged pieces of the Lewiston city limits across the map at least twice in this changeset. |
| 2 | 2018-04-11 10:19:13 UTC | GITNE | Right, sorry. JOSM did not download the admin border while some nodes shared highways and borders. Next time, I'll see what I can do to prevent this from happening again. Thank you for the quick fix. | |
| 57976724 by Polyglot | 1 | 2018-04-10 20:36:11 UTC | Carnildo | I sure hope you got this right, since there's no way a changeset this big can be properly reviewed. In particular, there's a good chance you've misattributed some things named after Martin Luther, the Protestant reformer, as being named after Martin Luther King Jr., the civil rights activist. (And... |
| 2 | 2018-04-15 03:11:58 UTC | Paul Johnson | Looks like there's multiple items in the Tulsa and Sapulpa areas (Two bridges, two streets and an expressway) that you missed. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57976724 | |
| 3 | 2018-04-16 06:54:53 UTC | Polyglot | Hi Paul,Could you add those name:etymology:wikidata tags on those objects. I tried to find them, but couldn't based on the name tag alone (and then I started to map public transport again :-) ) | |
| 57819875 by MandiLeigh | 1 | 2018-04-05 20:40:38 UTC | Carnildo | I don't know if you've noticed it yet, but you can change which background imagery you're using by clicking the "Background settings" tab (the one with an icon that looks sort of like three stacked sheets of paper). Different imagery sets are newer, or sharper, or better-aligned than othe... |
| 57678628 by cougMapper | 1 | 2018-03-31 09:28:05 UTC | Carnildo | It looks like the old mapping of those buildings was an attempt to use the "Simple 3D buildings" system (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings), but they didn't get it quite right. |
| 57523509 by Howpper | 1 | 2018-03-28 07:37:02 UTC | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you say this has an elevation of 503 *meters* rather than 503 *feet*? The USGS topo map for the area, in particular, shows this as being surrounded by a 500-foot contour line. |
| 57344980 by Paul_ | 1 | 2018-03-25 08:04:18 UTC | Carnildo | Is Midway really a reversible one-way street? |
| 57337330 by pcavan1 | 1 | 2018-03-25 07:48:29 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for helping improve the map.20 MPH is an unusual speed limit for a residential street in Spokane -- usually the limit is 25. Are you sure it's correct? |
| 57308908 by The_Oak | 1 | 2018-03-25 07:34:06 UTC | Carnildo | Don't use Google Streetview to add things to the map. Google tends to object to that, often in legally unpleasant ways. |
| 57308343 by Raikua | 1 | 2018-03-25 07:32:03 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't make up features just to fill in the map. If there's nothing there, there's nothing there. |
| 56722038 by mambus | 1 | 2018-02-27 21:35:32 UTC | Carnildo | Are these former missile sites you're adding still in use as military land, or should they be tagged as "historic:military" plus their current civilian use? |
| 2 | 2018-02-27 22:01:46 UTC | mambus | its former, but i dont know what happened to the land? i thought when you dont see much civilian stuff going on it might still be in goverment hands? no idea though | |
| 3 | 2018-02-27 22:08:20 UTC | Carnildo | There's a thriving real-estate market for used missile silos (eg. http://www.missilebases.com/), so many if not all of these are in private hands. None of the ones you've added are in parts of the state where I can easily check ownership, though. | |
| 4 | 2018-03-14 06:50:05 UTC | Carnildo | Passed by this one on Sunday on my way back from a hike, and it looked decidedly civilian. I've removed the "landuse=military" tag. | |
| 57018699 by sm8000 | 1 | 2018-03-09 05:00:35 UTC | Carnildo | I'm not seeing any of the usual signs of this being a track, such as the road wandering off into a field or forest, or a road that's just a couple of ruts worn into the ground from repeated use. In the aerial imagery, it looks more like a "minor/unclassified road", which is what I've re-t... |
| 2 | 2018-03-09 05:16:32 UTC | sm8000 | Thank you for the comment. I agree with you. I was trying to get appear as an un-paved road, ie, not a yellow or a white line but something else. There are many roads in my area that are unpaved but look the same as paved roads on the basemap. I hope my question makes sense. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-09 19:24:25 UTC | Carnildo | The display on the OpenStreetMap website doesn't currently distinguish between paved and unpaved roads, but other users of the OSM data do. For example, the OsmAnd map software will overlay brown (dirt), light grey (gravel, generic unpaved), or light yellow (sand) dashes on a road to indicate the s... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-10 04:28:08 UTC | sm8000 | Thank you very much for the reply. This clears up a lot and pretty much renders what I was hoping to do pointless. I came to OSM through a website used for planning cycling routes (www.ridewithgps.com). The basemap there is google maps (which doesn’t differentiate road surface through colo... | |
| 5 | 2018-03-10 18:52:23 UTC | Carnildo | If you want to use OSM for bicycling, you might want to check out the https://opencyclemap.org/ or http://cycle.travel/map websites, both of which re-render OSM data with an emphasis on bicycle-relevant features. The cycle.travel map draws unpaved roads in a "dashed line" style, while Ope... | |
| 56938197 by Amanda Nyambura Irungu | 1 | 2018-03-08 07:51:25 UTC | Carnildo | Please be more careful with your editing. You broke Lake Victoria by removing part of the coastline. |
| 56808426 by thetornado76 | 1 | 2018-03-02 09:48:41 UTC | Carnildo | I'm not sure all of these were using "grade" to mean "tracktype". For example, an asphalt surface in excellent condition is hardly a "grade3" tracktype. |
| 2 | 2018-03-02 14:07:35 UTC | thetornado76 | I had changed only grade=x to tracktype=gradex. If there not highway=track maybe grade=x is wrong and can removed.If surface=asphalt you are right there is grade3 wrong. | |
| 56738146 by Katherine Auge | 1 | 2018-02-28 09:23:22 UTC | Carnildo | What sort of thing is a "Missoula Correctional Services"? Is it a jail? A courthouse? Something else entirely?A name and address lets people search for something if they know the name, but adding tags to indicate what sort of thing it is helps people searching by type (eg. someone w... |
| 2 | 2018-02-28 15:27:38 UTC | Katherine Auge | It's a pre-release center. I didn't realize how to tag it but will do so in future | |
| 56667416 by Alejandro Andreu | 1 | 2018-02-25 19:34:00 UTC | Carnildo | What are you doing that involves scattering hundreds of unlabeled nodes across the world, and are you planning on cleaning up after yourself? |
| 56509373 by carlb | 1 | 2018-02-20 08:12:24 UTC | Carnildo | If it's Sears *Canada* that's dead, then why does this changeset delete a Sears store from Washington? |
| 2 | 2018-02-20 14:40:43 UTC | carlb | I've reverted that one node as an error; the rest of this changeset is all Canada (BC, AB, ON, QC, NB, NS) and the entire chain is indeed gone in those locations, but King County WA is likely to be still extant for now. | |
| 56509155 by Kingdom2917 | 1 | 2018-02-20 08:09:55 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't put descriptions into the names of things. It looks ugly to humans, and confuses computers no end. |
| 56506679 by Glassman | 1 | 2018-02-20 07:19:53 UTC | Carnildo | Mind being a little less eager with the chainsaw? One of the two logging roads you deleted here was highly visible in the Esri "Clarity" imagery. (The other looked like it was only traversible on foot, if that.) |
| 56506322 by gotterbild | 1 | 2018-02-20 06:58:28 UTC | Carnildo | If you add the "toilets" tag to a restroom, it'll show up in searches for restrooms (a very useful thing). I've taken care of it for this instance, but it's something to keep in mind in the future.You might also want to double-check the location. It looks to me like you've drawn the ... |
| 56476632 by Kingdom2917 | 1 | 2018-02-19 04:30:13 UTC | Carnildo | I'm not sure what you were trying to do here, but you've effectively erased a bicycle path from the map. I've undone your changes, but please be more careful in the future. |
| 56248681 by Josh Hylden | 1 | 2018-02-11 06:43:03 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't make nonsensical changes like turning a road into a canal. |
| 2 | 2018-02-11 06:49:28 UTC | Josh Hylden | That was unintentional. I apologize. | |
| 56231064 by Glassman | 1 | 2018-02-10 09:30:40 UTC | Carnildo | Is there a reason you deleted a bunch of logging roads and at least one driveway, rather than re-tagging them as tracks and service roads? |
| 56178367 by nathanieljwise | 1 | 2018-02-09 09:09:53 UTC | Carnildo | I'm not sure how you managed it, but you partially deleted a park in Austria in addition to your changes in the Tacoma area. I've fixed things, but please be more careful in the future. |
| 2 | 2018-02-09 20:14:52 UTC | nathanieljwise | Whoops. I thought I undid the Austrian changes. | |
| 56201768 by Niloslabs | 1 | 2018-02-09 08:21:50 UTC | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!In case you haven't noticed it, you can change the background imagery you see when mapping by clicking the "Background Settings" button (the one that looks a little like three stacked sheets of paper) and selecting an option from the list that appears. The "Esri Wo... |
| 55666583 by pslarkin | 1 | 2018-01-22 21:13:44 UTC | Carnildo | Is the northernmost section of the road actually being rehabilitated? |
| 2 | 2018-01-22 21:28:10 UTC | pslarkin | If you are referring to road coincident to the conservation area, Yes. I'm not sure what the status is of the road on private land. You can read more here: https://static.spokanecity.org/documents/urbanforestry/bluff-restoration/bluff-road-restoration-plan.pdf | |
| 3 | 2018-01-23 10:13:02 UTC | Carnildo | I got out my most recent survey photos, and as of September 24 of last year, the northernmost section (the part mapped as a service road) was still a bare dirt track, showing no rehabilitation effort. Do you have more recent observations? | |
| 4 | 2018-01-26 17:27:14 UTC | pslarkin | I requested a response from Land Expressions, the contractor responsible for the work. I was forwarded to Avista, who has yet to respond. I'll reply here when I get more information. | |
| 5 | 2018-01-30 00:24:51 UTC | pslarkin | I spoke with an employee from Avista. This is a synapses: Land was restored to it's previous state. So if dirt was moved it was replaced. If grass was trampled, it was reseeded, and on city property trees were planted. The road is still a double track service road on parcel 35312.0002, and likel... | |
| 6 | 2018-02-04 09:22:38 UTC | Carnildo | I got a chance to survey most of this today, and the north section is still very road-like: double-track bare dirt. Grass seed has been sprinkled on a few stretches, but there's been zero regrowth. Further south, there's been rehabilitation effort, but the damage will be visible for a few years ye... | |
| 7 | 2018-02-05 14:49:43 UTC | pslarkin | Pm sent | |
| 56019865 by Cyberaddict | 1 | 2018-02-03 06:56:58 UTC | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions.Something to keep an eye out for, though: two of the smaller buildings you mapped here are actually cars (I've deleted them). When you're mapping things that aren't clear from the aerial imagery, it's helpful to switch between multiple image so... |
| 55953838 by venusian_green | 1 | 2018-02-02 02:34:02 UTC | Carnildo | The trail you've added here appears to cut across somebody's field. Is it really a public access point? |
| 55806924 by Anton Lavrov | 1 | 2018-01-28 00:20:04 UTC | Carnildo | A tip for when you're editing in Spokane County (or, as here, just over the border): Esri World Imagery is far sharper than any of the other options, and nearly the newest. |
| 2 | 2018-01-28 01:16:18 UTC | Anton Lavrov | Indeed - thanks for the tip! | |
| 55761914 by cougMapper | 1 | 2018-01-26 23:36:03 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't add fake objects to the map -- it just makes more work for those of us who need to clean up afterwards. If you want to map for Pokemon, there are plenty of real parks you can add. |
| 55723753 by Loren S | 1 | 2018-01-25 00:09:53 UTC | Carnildo | Don't use Google Earth as a source for mapping. The Google terms of service and OpenStreetMap policy both prohibit it, and Google tends to get upset about this in legally unpleasant ways.(Additionally, it's likely that Google Earth got this wrong: the Kootenai National Forest website, which *is... |
| 55564222 by ADJOGBLE Emmanuel | 1 | 2018-01-19 21:11:09 UTC | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you moved a large number of objects ten meters to the southwest? |
| 2 | 2018-01-23 20:35:48 UTC | Jogar24 | Sorry I am new, but I moved some streets and objects that are in an erroneous place by some street but did not move more things | |
| 55539125 by ADJOGBLE Emmanuel | 1 | 2018-01-18 22:11:13 UTC | Carnildo | What did you actually do in this changeset? "Adding buildings" isn't an accurate description of a changeset that moves thousands of nodes scattered around the world, but doesn't add anything. |
| 55445540 by GwennDragon | 1 | 2018-01-16 05:39:27 UTC | Carnildo | Did you forget to add a tag to the way you created here? |
| 55435186 by KitSEA | 1 | 2018-01-16 04:29:44 UTC | Carnildo | In case you didn't know, you can change the background imagery the editor's showing you by clicking the "Background settings" tab (the one that looks sort of like three stacked sheets of paper) and selecting from the menu that comes up. In the Spokane County area, the "Esri world ima... |
| 55434662 by KitSEA | 1 | 2018-01-16 04:26:47 UTC | Carnildo | I know there's some major construction going on in this area right now. Do these buildings represent the new construction, old work, or are they in an area unaffected by the construction? |
| 55392319 by David Crochet | 1 | 2018-01-13 05:05:52 UTC | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted Greenacres Airport? There's a very runway-looking structure about a mile southwest of the former node location, right where the FAA's records say the airport is. |
| 2 | 2018-01-15 21:08:29 UTC | Mxdanger | You really need to add descriptions of what you're doing. At the very least include a source. We have no idea of the meaning of this edit and if it's correct. | |
| 55218284 by megcda | 1 | 2018-01-08 08:28:05 UTC | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you've duplicated a number of existing roads? A changeset comment of "#msftbusinessapps" isn't very informative. |
| 54912996 by seahorse41 | 1 | 2017-12-30 00:53:57 UTC | Carnildo | The usual ways to add addresses are to either trace a building and put the address data on it, or add an isolated point and put the address data on that. I don't know how map software will handle addresses placed on the ends of roads. |
| 2 | 2017-12-30 05:57:48 UTC | seahorse41 | Are the addresses at the intersection of driveway and named road okay to leave as is? Is it just the addresses at the other end of the driveway that need to be deleted? | |
| 3 | 2017-12-31 04:39:28 UTC | Carnildo | I don't know. Address points on roads are sufficiently out of the ordinary that I've got no idea if it will be handled properly or not. | |
| 55017783 by nirmac04 | 1 | 2017-12-30 02:09:06 UTC | Carnildo | Could you please do your "stuff" in smaller areas at a time? A change like this that includes things in both Washington and Alabama will show up in the map history for virtually the entire United States. |
| 2 | 2017-12-31 01:49:47 UTC | Island Human | Please provide better descriptions than "stuff". | |
| 54944859 by Ann4567 | 1 | 2017-12-30 01:36:07 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't abbreviate street names. It's easy for a computer to convert a word to an abbreviation if it needs to save space, but it's very difficult to go the other direction. (For example, should "St" be expanded to "Street", "State", or "Saint"?) |
| 2 | 2017-12-30 01:54:49 UTC | Ann4567 | Thanks for letting me know. It looks like you have already fixed the streets I added! | |
| 54931135 by ChrissW-R1 | 1 | 2017-12-30 01:30:00 UTC | Carnildo | Could you please pay attention to the changes you're making? The "band" tag on node 1825813421 wasn't an error (it refers to a radio frequency range), while the value for the "phone" tag that you changed to "contact:phone" on ways 161636552 and 256877327 had the meanin... |
| 2 | 2018-01-04 00:06:16 UTC | ChrissW-R1 | Thank you for reverting my mistake about the band tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55024451By the way, why we don't have a tagging schema for this kind of information? There are so many antennas in defined bands and where the information could useful for i.e. emergency services.\... | |
| 54874875 by seahorse41 | 1 | 2017-12-27 18:14:43 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added the new key "County Road" to three roads. This looks like a mistake. Could you check and fix this tag?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2017-12-27 18:32:58 UTC | seahorse41 | @mueschelHi Jan, Thanks for the pointer/advice. Should I name it 'CR ###' instead or is there a better way to tag which roads Are county (public) roads? I have the official list with me, and most are classified as Residential or Minor/Unclassified now. I see that CR tag is available only with Tert... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-29 01:19:41 UTC | Carnildo | If I'm understanding the meaning of the "County Road" tag correctly, I think the best thing to do would be to use the "ref" tag with a value of "CR ###", similar to how state highways get "ref" tags such as "WA 21". | |
| 54852058 by Rolan Guy | 1 | 2017-12-28 23:50:13 UTC | Carnildo | Some of the hotels you've added are on decidedly warehouse-looking buildings. Are you sure you've got the locations right? |
| 2 | 2018-01-03 01:12:46 UTC | Mxdanger | I checked the location of the nodes on Google, in the same coordinates, and it showed already existing buildings. There ARE definitely warehouses if you check the state imagery and the website that was added to every hotel doesn't exist. I feel like this is intentional.Look what else he did: https... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-05 10:05:08 UTC | Alecs01 | Reverted | |
| 54630223 by Darth_Vader | 1 | 2017-12-14 19:14:43 UTC | naoliv | Hi, Juggalo_Kyle.It seems that you did remove 4 areas which were representing some schools. For example, the White Knoll High School https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/546860888/historyDid you see something wrong with the objects, maybe? Or there was another reason to remove them? |
| 2 | 2017-12-18 16:36:59 UTC | naoliv | Juggalo_Kyle, I restored the school areas. Note that these areas are representing the school grounds and not the school building, for example.Do not hesitate to contact us if you have any doubts. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-19 05:23:16 UTC | Darth_Vader | The "school grounds" detail affects apps for people who work, visit, and interact with these places in a negative way. Myself being one of them. In order to prevent this, this detail should not be mapped. Labeling the school building is detail enough. The "school grounds" detail ... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-19 09:30:54 UTC | freebeer | A better philosophy for you to grasp is, OpenStreetMap documents the world as it exists.We do not map for the app, we map reality.We map landuse.These are school grounds, and that is fact.If these facts bother you, take it up with your app, it is not for OSM to pander to the apps or their us... | |
| 5 | 2017-12-19 10:24:20 UTC | naoliv | Which app you are using that makes this looks like an error?You should try to fix it in the app that you are using (by contacting the developers, maybe), instead removing a valid data that everybody else uses.And again, please, don't remove these areas. | |
| 6 | 2017-12-19 14:47:07 UTC | Darth_Vader | If you insist on creating problems for the people that actually live around these places, the locals and myself, then I will create problems for everyone else by creating multiple accounts and mass deleting features all around the world. | |
| 7 | 2017-12-19 15:03:54 UTC | woodpeck | Darth_Vader, what you are threatening here is computer vandalism and it is illegal in South Carolina. Participating in such activity can severely affect your school/college experience or career. Think twice before you do anything you regret later - it's not worth it. | |
| 8 | 2017-12-20 22:47:43 UTC | Carnildo | Naoliv, I'm pretty sure the app in question is "Pokemon Go": it doesn't spawn Pokemon on school grounds, but it does spawn them on meadows, grass, forests, and sand -- or in other words, exactly the detail that Darth_Vader has added to Carolina Springs Elementary School. | |
| 9 | 2017-12-21 11:26:45 UTC | naoliv | @Carnildo it seems to be the case, indeed. Yesterday a friend also sent some links, like https://pokemongo.gamepress.gg/q-a/poke-spawns-stopped-my-city-college which says "Niantic has stopped pokemon spawning in schools." | |
| 54668694 by Carnildo | 1 | 2017-12-16 21:07:00 UTC | Andrew colin | Thanks for cleaning them up a bit, it's hard to square things up editing on an iPad |
| 2 | 2017-12-17 19:25:45 UTC | Carnildo | iD has a built-in function for squaring up the corners of an object to the nearest 45-degree angle: either hit the "S" key or right-click and select "Square" from the menu that appears. I don't know how you'd use either of them on a tablet, though. | |
| 54690272 by mstrsknk | 1 | 2017-12-17 06:05:45 UTC | Carnildo | You don't need to put descriptions such as "home" in the "name" field -- it's obvious that a building is a house because it's tagged as such. |
| 54646841 by Andrew colin | 1 | 2017-12-16 00:16:14 UTC | Carnildo | Is Dart-Lo a public park, or a private youth camp? (I'm not sure how you'd tag the latter, but calling it a "park" would be misleading.) |
| 2 | 2017-12-16 21:12:17 UTC | Andrew colin | I couldn't find a better tag for it, i saw another tagged similarly. | |
| 54646943 by Andrew colin | 1 | 2017-12-15 23:22:26 UTC | Carnildo | In case you haven't already noticed it, the "Esri World Imagery" for Spokane County is far sharper than the default Bing imagery -- it's detailed enough that it should show things like the cemetery fence. |
| 2 | 2017-12-16 21:13:58 UTC | Andrew colin | Thanks for the tip! I did most of the outlining by using the topographic map. I'll have to use that one when I put in the rest of the neighborhood. | |
| 54504023 by Captain_Phil | 1 | 2017-12-11 21:29:02 UTC | Carnildo | In case you haven't noticed, you can change the background imagery you're using by clicking on the "background settings" tab (the one that looks vaguely like three stacked sheets of paper). In Spokane County, the "Esri World Imagery" option is much sharper and better-aligned tha... |
| 2 | 2017-12-11 21:42:23 UTC | Captain_Phil | Thank you so much, that is so much better than the default. | |
| 54442093 by Captain_Phil | 1 | 2017-12-07 20:57:33 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for the addition!In my experience, actual speed limits on offramps are rare. Is this one a legal limit (a white sign), or an advisory speed limit (a yellow sign)? It makes a difference in how they should be marked on the map. |
| 2 | 2017-12-07 21:05:19 UTC | Captain_Phil | It's a white DOT speed limit sign. Drivers at my company know this offramp very well as the company GPS says it's a 30mph zone even though the signage says 50. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-07 21:21:02 UTC | Carnildo | Okay, thanks for the confirmation. | |
| 54352878 by cougMapper | 1 | 2017-12-05 04:36:47 UTC | cougMapper | Pokemon GO |
| 2 | 2017-12-05 09:02:34 UTC | Carnildo | A useful technique I've found for mapping apartment complexes and other groups of related buildings is to draw an area around the entire complex, tag it with the appropriate land use (such as "Residential Area"), and put the name on that. It saves cluttering up the map with dozens of iden... | |
| 54351357 by Bonehead411 | 1 | 2017-12-05 03:01:25 UTC | Glassman | Nice edits. It would be helpful if you could give a better description of what you did. For example, added storage facility and landuse |
| 2 | 2017-12-05 07:47:51 UTC | Carnildo | It looks like you did what's called a "node drag" here, where you accidentally grabbed part of an object and pulled it across the map. I've fixed it, but it's something to watch out for when you're editing. | |
| 54350557 by Bonehead411 | 1 | 2017-12-05 07:39:41 UTC | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!A quick tip for getting good-looking buildings: you can trace the approximate outline, then hit "S" to square up the corners. It sure beats trying to do it by hand. |
| 54252403 by Isaacs87 | 1 | 2017-12-05 07:08:05 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for your additions.Spiral roads like you drew in the southern parking lot here are far from the best way to do things. Routing software tends to be rather literal-minded, and will give people directions to drive around in circles. Instead, you should draw parking aisles as a series of l... |
| 54244593 by Thalmus084 | 1 | 2017-12-02 05:02:14 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for the updates.A quick tip: this sort of short access road is usually better tagged as a "Driveway" or "Service road", rather than as a "Minor/Unclassified" or "Residential" road. |
| 54207246 by 0utrider | 1 | 2017-12-02 04:30:31 UTC | Carnildo | I'm not sure what you were trying to do here, but you re-named a section of a street as "Chelan Public Utility District".I've undone the change, but please be more careful in the future. |
| 54131353 by Rand1526 | 1 | 2017-11-28 05:37:10 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for the help improving the mapping of rural areas.In the future, when you save your changes, could you include a descriptive comment? For example, this could reasonably be described as "Improve road alignment". |
| 2 | 2017-11-28 14:15:07 UTC | Rand1526 | Thanks- I will add descriptive comments- thanks for letting me know :-) | |
| 54084579 by venusian_green | 1 | 2017-11-26 20:14:44 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't put descriptions such as "unoccupied" into name fields. It causes no end of confusion to computers. |
| 54074247 by DoubleA | 1 | 2017-11-25 18:47:51 UTC | Carnildo | Are you sure this isn't an airport? Aerial imagery shows a very runway-like structure going north-south and a taxiway-looking structure heading off to the northeast to a group of hangar-like sheds. Additionally, the FAA records state that there are 14 general-aviation aircraft based out of an &quo... |
| 54049622 by mGlanzer | 1 | 2017-11-24 18:24:56 UTC | Carnildo | Is the "Payday Loans" business you added an actual bank, or would it be more accurate to tag it as a "Money Lender" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmoney_lender)? |
| 2 | 2017-11-27 09:07:08 UTC | mGlanzer | Thank you for the heads up. I wasn't aware of that category, and changed it accordingly. | |
| 53823358 by atonalmaps | 1 | 2017-11-17 18:49:27 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for your additions.For future reference, it's best if you save your changes before moving to edit in a new area. An edit like this will show up in the map history for anyone looking at the west coast of the United States or a large part of the Pacific Ocean, even though it only actually ... |
| 53754232 by Payday Loans Online | 1 | 2017-11-14 07:37:12 UTC | Carnildo | I've deleted this and your other edits. Please don't map things that don't actually have a physical presence. |
| 53750733 by phonomenal | 1 | 2017-11-14 04:17:31 UTC | Carnildo | Please be careful with your editing -- you removed the Knoxville city limits with this change. |
| 53655600 by Nikki Beaudoin | 1 | 2017-11-10 05:08:31 UTC | Carnildo | #saveyourchangesbeforemovingfromcanadatoethiopia #remembertotagyourobjects |
| 2 | 2017-11-11 17:15:09 UTC | daganzdaanda | Hi Nikki Beaudoin, welcome to OpenStreetMap!.It seems that you had some trouble with Lake Beseka. (I have repaired the lake, it should re-appear soon.) .The lake is mapped as a "relation", which makes it a little bit more complicated than other areas. iD is not the best editor when... | |
| 53515865 by venusian_green | 1 | 2017-11-05 03:07:54 UTC | Carnildo | "Service" is almost never the correct classification for a miles-long road: it's intended for things like driveways, alleys, and the occasional road up a hill to an antenna.From what I can see of NFDR 313 in the aerial imagery, it looks like it's a mix of unclassified, track, possibly ... |
| 53493479 by Taho3 | 1 | 2017-11-04 06:18:30 UTC | Carnildo | I've re-tagged the shooting range using standard tags, so it'll show up on maps. Does it have a name? |
| 53285059 by mGlanzer | 1 | 2017-10-27 17:54:56 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for your contributions.A couple of tips for improving your work:1) After you've traced a building or other man-made feature, you can square up the corners by highlighting it and hitting the "S" key. It's hard to draw a perfectly-square corner; this is an easy way to solve t... |
| 2 | 2017-10-30 09:09:24 UTC | mGlanzer | Thank you! I'll be keeping that in mind. | |
| 53156527 by Katie Clifford | 1 | 2017-10-23 17:11:32 UTC | Carnildo | In case you haven't noticed, you can change which imagery you're using by clicking on the "Background settings" button in the editor (the icon that looks a little like three stacked sheets of paper). In Spokane County, for example, the "Esri World Imagery" is far sharper than th... |
| 53105554 by toddzillasocal | 1 | 2017-10-20 20:35:42 UTC | Carnildo | When did they raise the speed limit on Magnesium? It was 35 when I drove through there last December. |
| 2 | 2017-10-23 04:41:08 UTC | Carnildo | I don't know where you got a speed limit of 45 from, but the sign said "35" when I drove through there this evening. I've reverted the change. | |
| 52872287 by BKnightDLM | 1 | 2017-10-14 06:46:29 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for your contributions.Please don't use abbreviations in names. A computer can easily abbreviate words if it needs to save space, but it's impossible to automatically go the other direction. For example, is "st" an abbreviation for "state", "street", or &qu... |
| 52871609 by Biblio Morgan | 1 | 2017-10-13 17:37:21 UTC | Carnildo | A quick editing tip: if you click the "Background Settings" button on the side of the editor (the one with the icon that looks sort of like three stacked sheets of paper), you can switch to "Esri World Imagery", which is much sharper in Spokane County than the default Bing imager... |
| 52701823 by tebiggs | 1 | 2017-10-10 16:46:30 UTC | Carnildo | I noticed you used the Bing imagery for this changeset. When you're editing in Spokane County, the ESRI imagery is *far* sharper than Bing, and usually better-aligned. |
| 52660201 by Reno Editor | 1 | 2017-10-06 18:15:28 UTC | Carnildo | Why did you delete the traffic camera here? Has it been removed? |
| 52604629 by Edward-H | 1 | 2017-10-04 17:56:36 UTC | Carnildo | In addition to whatever you were trying to do in Tanzania, you dragged a couple of nodes in Portland. Please be more careful in the future. |
| 52549845 by Timothy Whidden | 1 | 2017-10-02 17:30:18 UTC | Carnildo | Please be careful not to join buildings to sidewalks or roads, as you did in this changeset. Some routing software interprets "building on a path" literally, and assumes the building is blocking the path. |
| 52260013 by Poabulbosa | 1 | 2017-09-22 19:31:04 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for the addition to the map.Right now, you've got the entire facility marked as being a single building. Is there a particular building, possibly the big one in the middle, that's the actual office? |
| 2 | 2017-09-26 17:25:26 UTC | user_5359 | Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. | |
| 52054464 by martefact | 1 | 2017-09-15 03:26:54 UTC | Carnildo | Which imagery did you use when adjusting the cliffs? Not all aerial photographs are created equal, and when tracing something with abrupt changes in height like this, it's critical that you use images with good orthorectification. |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 05:55:56 UTC | martefact | Hello Carnildo - I used/consulted multiple sources to adjust the cliffline geo. USGS Topo, multiple hires aerials including ortho and nonortho. I've also hiked the entirety of the butte recording GPS tracks. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-15 06:08:14 UTC | Carnildo | Sounds good to me. | |
| 51954547 by Natfoot | 1 | 2017-09-13 04:31:56 UTC | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset. Yes, the current mapping throws up all sorts of automated QA errors, but fixing it properly involves an afternoon of hiking up and down the hillside to see how the trail network is adapting to the road and road-removal efforts. |
| 51988701 by Howpper | 1 | 2017-09-13 04:16:18 UTC | Carnildo | Why do you think this street is residential? It has an elevated speed limit, right-of-way over traffic on cross streets, is classified by the city as an arterial, and in general is How You Get Places in that part of town. In short, it looks an awful lot like a tertiary road. |
| 51829634 by jessbeutler | 1 | 2017-09-08 03:48:11 UTC | Carnildo | When adding building names, it helps if you also add the buildings, or at least indicate that the points you're adding *are* buildings. I've traced three of them, but Delta Delta Delta and Delta Sigma Phi don't clearly correspond to buildings. |
| 2 | 2017-09-08 04:53:10 UTC | jessbeutler | Hi Carnildo, thanks for the comment. I add these names on my Go Map!! app as I walk around and then add the buildings when I get back onto OSM later in the day. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-08 16:42:45 UTC | Carnildo | Does Go Map!! have a way of adding "building=yes" or similar when you're adding the name? Doing that would make it obvious that adding a standalone name wasn't a mistake. | |
| 51831394 by ashleyannmathew | 1 | 2017-09-08 05:29:48 UTC | Carnildo | This bridge is straight. It only appears bent in the imagery because of bad orthorectification. |
| 2 | 2017-09-28 10:22:39 UTC | ashleyannmathew | Thanks for pointing it out and correcting the same. | |
| 51656380 by archaeo | 1 | 2017-09-01 22:43:54 UTC | Carnildo | Has US-97 really been upgraded to the "almost-Interstate" quality implied by "highway=trunk"? Looking at the aerial imagery, I'm not seeing most of the features I'd expect from a trunk road: four or more lanes, a median or median barrier, no intersecting driveways and few inters... |
| 2 | 2017-09-01 23:05:33 UTC | archaeo | I interpred "Important roads that are not motorways." as a better description than 'Primary Road'. However, digging into it a bit I see that 'Primary Road' is indeed the better descriptor. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-01 23:06:40 UTC | archaeo | I haven't rolled back a changeset before - Can you point me in the right direction? | |
| 4 | 2017-09-01 23:45:21 UTC | Carnildo | I'm not sure how you'd do it in iD (the website editor). The standalone JOSM editor has a "reverter" plugin you can use for easy rollback of changesets: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter | |
| 50217496 by HubMiner | 1 | 2017-08-30 04:21:02 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't use "access=no" for brief construction closures. Most data users update no more often than once a month -- this road was open again by the time I got there, but OsmAnd had picked up your closure and refused to route to the parking lot. |
| 2 | 2017-08-30 04:43:01 UTC | HubMiner | Good point, thanks. | |
| 51096013 by Greg_Rose | 1 | 2017-08-14 07:06:50 UTC | Carnildo | Where did you get the name "South H Street" from? The name fits the pattern for the area, but I drove that road a couple months back and couldn't find a street sign anywhere. |
| 50929123 by mac99201 | 1 | 2017-08-08 07:38:08 UTC | Carnildo | Not all arterials are primary roads. This one, in particular, is a winding two-lane road with a significant height restriction that is unlikely to ever see much traffic. |
| 50732344 by Carolus Rex | 1 | 2017-07-31 20:46:02 UTC | Carnildo | The building outline you drew for the Cambell House appears to cover two buildings. Which one is the actual Cambell House? |
| 2 | 2017-07-31 20:48:12 UTC | Carolus Rex | The larger on the left is the House, proper, the smaller is the carriage house for the Campbell House | |
| 3 | 2017-07-31 22:37:39 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks. I've improved the tracing of the Cambell House, and added a separate outline for the carriage house. | |
| 50637104 by Hyeonmin Park | 1 | 2017-07-28 08:31:29 UTC | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset: it appears to be personal bookmarks rather than an attempt to improve the map. |
| 50385064 by Natfoot | 1 | 2017-07-18 22:52:51 UTC | Carnildo | Is Fifth Street really one-way over its entire length, or did you forget to split the way where it divides in two? |
| 50349963 by The Mapster | 1 | 2017-07-18 06:39:27 UTC | Carnildo | In several of your recent edits, you've forgotten to add tags to what you've drawn, and you've added roads that cross other roads without connecting.A bare line that doesn't indicate what sort of thing it represents isn't very useful, and won't show up on the map. A road that isn't connected (i... |
| 50191300 by Carnildo | 1 | 2017-07-11 17:15:48 UTC | HubMiner | Thanks for fixing this; I wonder if there is a way to add that it could be closed at park's discretion (access=permissive?). |
| 2 | 2017-07-11 17:16:23 UTC | HubMiner | ...without messing up navigation applications. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-11 18:25:04 UTC | Carnildo | I don't know of any. Adding an additional "access:conditional=no @ winter" would express the seasonal closure without interfering with normal routing, but I don't know of any software that uses the "access:conditional" tag, and it doesn't cover the fact that the gate can be clos... | |
| 50189969 by HubMiner | 1 | 2017-07-11 04:04:23 UTC | Carnildo | When you add a normally-open gate to a road, it's important to add access information. Routing software is inconsistent about how it treats a gate with no information: some software defaults to "yes", while other software defaults to "no". |
| 50142922 by pluton_od | 1 | 2017-07-09 08:52:05 UTC | Carnildo | I'm pretty sure this rest area is already mapped, about a half-mile north of where you've put it. |
| 2 | 2017-07-11 04:19:07 UTC | pluton_od | Hi Carnildo. Thanks, you're right. | |
| 50070748 by Brad Meteor | 1 | 2017-07-06 04:15:54 UTC | Carnildo | Did you forget to put a name on the locality you added (node 4953767238)? |
| 49878427 by phlustik | 1 | 2017-06-28 05:08:02 UTC | Carnildo | Something went badly wrong with this edit -- you appear to have re-used a node from Indonesia for your waterfall. I've reverted it. |
| 2 | 2017-06-28 05:29:35 UTC | phlustik | Hi, thanks for the fix. I've used OsmAnd Edit POI function, this must be a bug in OsmAnd. I will use JOSM instead. | |
| 49851018 by SD Mapman | 1 | 2017-06-27 23:14:45 UTC | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you're calling Friday Avenue/River Street through Mullan a "primary road"? I drove it last Saturday, and it's a very minor road through a very minor town -- the general feel I got was that it should be classified as "tertiary". It's a narrow low-speed two-... |
| 2 | 2017-06-28 00:11:41 UTC | SD Mapman | My general rule is to stick business interstates as primary based on the route marker. However, feel free to change it if you have more immediate knowledge (which it sounds like you do). | |
| 49706646 by nrotstan | 1 | 2017-06-20 23:46:12 UTC | Carnildo | Are you sure about the non-existence of Humbert Airport? The DigitalGlobe Standard imagery (the newest available for this area) shows a line of ground parallel to the nearby field with a worn look to it, and a structure at the north end of that line that could be a hangar. |
| 2 | 2017-06-20 23:53:29 UTC | nrotstan | Ah, ok, thank you for catching that! | |
| 49670819 by PanierAvide | 1 | 2017-06-19 19:22:03 UTC | manings | Hi, PanierAvide. This edit spans the whole US. Can you point to a documentation in the wiki about this edits. On quick look this is a mechanical edit and should follow community guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct |
| 2 | 2017-06-19 19:43:05 UTC | PanierAvide | It is not an automated edit, it was using Maproulette (challenge about aerodromes). Each edit was made manually by myself. However, it spans over the country as Maproulette gives random tasks over the country. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-19 19:45:22 UTC | PanierAvide | See http://maproulette.org/map/1/117 | |
| 4 | 2017-06-19 20:02:03 UTC | manings | Thanks for reply. I haven't check the data completely but a quick look seems they are all good. However, I encourage you to upload as often as possbile so that we don't have a changeset that is too big. Thanks for mapping. | |
| 5 | 2017-06-19 20:14:24 UTC | PanierAvide | Oh OK, I was thinking not creating too much changesets was better. I will know it for the next time. Thanks for letting me know :-) | |
| 6 | 2017-06-19 20:26:23 UTC | Carnildo | Keeping the number of changesets down is okay, as long as the changes are grouped into a small geographic area. "Cleaned up all the old airports in Pike County" is fine; "cleaned up a hundred old airports scattered around the United States" isn't. Unfortunately, Maproulette giv... | |
| 7 | 2017-06-19 20:37:27 UTC | PanierAvide | Makes sense, but as you said it isn't easy to do so in Maproulette. We have a tool in France named OpenSolarMap which gives random tasks (about roof orientation), but when another task is available nearly, you do this before others. That way you can work on random tasks but in a small area. Maybe Ma... | |
| 49579079 by Spark1815 | 1 | 2017-06-16 18:37:43 UTC | Carnildo | Best practice for indicating a business is closed is to prefix the "shop" tag with "disused:" (for example, "disused:shop=doityourself"), and to do the same with the "name" tag if the signs have been removed. If the signs are still there, leaving the "na... |
| 49548354 by John78 | 1 | 2017-06-15 20:42:07 UTC | Carnildo | Standard practice for schools is that the name goes on the school grounds, not on the school building, except in unusual cases such as two schools sharing a campus, or when the building has a name different from that of the school. |
| 49539840 by Zibz | 1 | 2017-06-14 21:37:53 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't make up names for things. |
| 49514731 by John78 | 1 | 2017-06-14 00:49:23 UTC | Carnildo | It looks to me like the towers were already mapped. Is there some reason why you're adding them again? |
| 49425525 by John78 | 1 | 2017-06-12 08:30:05 UTC | Carnildo | The "name" field should only be used for actual names, not descriptions. For example, it's obvious that a walkway is a walkway because it's tagged as "highway=footway". |
| 49342085 by malick mbao | 1 | 2017-06-07 18:44:22 UTC | Carnildo | What are you trying to do that involves drawing large, untagged outlines? |
| 2 | 2017-06-08 16:04:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that it got uploaded by mistake. I've reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49371802 .Best Regards, Andy (DWG) | |
| 49289574 by bas57 | 1 | 2017-06-07 07:01:30 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't abbreviate names. It's easy for a computer to decide it needs to shorten "Lane" to "Ln" if it needs space; it's much harder to decide if "St" should be expanded to "Street" or "Saint". |
| 49211954 by Samuel Cabral Cruz | 1 | 2017-06-03 08:44:48 UTC | Carnildo | What are you testing, and since it pretty clearly didn't work, are you planning on reverting it? |
| 2 | 2017-06-03 17:15:14 UTC | Samuel Cabral Cruz | Hi Carnildo,I tried to revert them, but I didn't find how to! The purppose of the test was to extract information with osmapi library from python. I finally used a different API.May you give me more infos on how to revert a modification? | |
| 3 | 2017-06-03 18:14:03 UTC | Carnildo | For situations like this, where you want to simply revert everything, the best tool is probably JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/). You'll need to activate the "Reverter" plugin, which will give you a "Revert changeset" menu option in the "Data" menu. Enter the num... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-03 22:19:26 UTC | Samuel Cabral Cruz | Hey Carnildo,Could you confirm that I correctly reverted all the tests commits. | |
| 5 | 2017-06-04 02:34:49 UTC | Carnildo | Looks to me like you got everything. | |
| 49211527 by Thalmus084 | 1 | 2017-06-03 09:17:17 UTC | Carnildo | The "name" field should only be used for names, not for descriptions. Something like when a building was completed would go in the "start_date" field. |
| 49214116 by TheDutchMan13 | 1 | 2017-06-03 08:41:54 UTC | Carnildo | What TIGER data have you deemed unnecessary here? |
| 2 | 2017-06-03 15:19:09 UTC | TheDutchMan13 | TIGER zip data left & right | |
| 49189282 by Carnildo | 1 | 2017-06-02 18:32:39 UTC | Carnildo | Additional imagery used: DigitalGlobe Standard and NAIP Washington 2015. |
| 49056742 by TheVegitos | 1 | 2017-05-29 06:36:13 UTC | Carnildo | This isn't a park, it's a couple houses. |
| 48986087 by emem | 1 | 2017-05-26 09:44:24 UTC | Carnildo | On straight segments of ways, it's generally considered good practice to leave nodes at periodic intervals. Because of the way the OSM API works, if you download a region containing a way, but that way has no nodes in the area, the way isn't visible. |
| 2 | 2017-05-26 15:17:15 UTC | emem | I simplified the boundary to 33ft (which is grated, relatively coarse, but the staircases were 31ft on average, possibly resulting from 10m/pixel bitmaps) which took out about 90% of the nodes.The average spacing between nodes is now about 300ft, comparable to node spacing of roads and other featu... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-28 19:08:54 UTC | Carnildo | It looks like you're taking out far more nodes than you intend. For example, way 409571420 went from 72 nodes relatively evenly spaced over three miles, to just eight nodes, with a maximum gap between nodes of 2.25 miles. | |
| 48978010 by bella1996 | 1 | 2017-05-25 20:26:44 UTC | Carnildo | The Cabella's in Post Falls is already mapped (it's that big building to the southwest), so please stop adding it. |
| 48891940 by Radio1313 | 1 | 2017-05-22 21:32:33 UTC | Carnildo | That doesn't look very park-like to me. It looks like somebody's house. |
| 48826523 by emem | 1 | 2017-05-19 21:54:29 UTC | Carnildo | It's not clear what happened, but it looks like this edit may have broken the banks of the Spokane River. |
| 2 | 2017-05-20 02:01:45 UTC | emem | I just checked the updated slippy map tiles and they look fine. Also re-downloaded the data, which looks fine is JOSM, too. Plus I'm still the last editor of these traces, the changelog suggest no inintended edits done in that changeset to the river (just moved 3 nodes of it).I do see when zooming... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-20 02:28:28 UTC | emem | I tagged the mapnik tiles within this changeset dirty and most of them re-renderd now. I see no issue with the Spokane river. Can you confirm ? | |
| 4 | 2017-05-20 03:56:47 UTC | Carnildo | Looks good in both JOSM and the website map. | |
| 48825282 by emem | 1 | 2017-05-19 21:24:36 UTC | Carnildo | Why did you delete a section of the Little Pend Oreille NWR boundary? According to the official map (https://www.fws.gov/refuge/Little_Pend_Oreille/map.html), that's an inholding in the refuge, presumably consisting of privately-owned land. |
| 48694587 by Howpper | 1 | 2017-05-15 18:11:51 UTC | Carnildo | I drove this a few weeks ago. There are no markings to indicate that Columbia Street or Wahluke Street are part of WA-24, or that WA-24 starts north of the WA-26 underpass. There is, however, a very nice "End WA-24" sign just *south* of the underpass.(It was somewhat disconcerting to... |
| 2 | 2017-05-17 21:08:28 UTC | Howpper | This is not technically part of the highway, but you have to take this way going from Westbound WA-26 to Westbound WA-24, or when going from eastbound WA-24 to westbound WA-26. This is also the way all of the highway signs direct traffic to. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-17 21:10:47 UTC | Howpper | Tell me how you would go from Northbound Broadway avenue to Westbound highway 26, without taking Columbia Street | |
| 4 | 2017-05-18 00:46:28 UTC | Carnildo | Navigation systems use the "name" and/or "ref" fields of roads when giving directions. Giving something a name that doesn't reflect the signs on the ground causes those systems to give bad directions.Yes, the shortest route from eastbound WA-24 to westbound WA-26 is via Colu... | |
| 48653272 by David Crochet | 1 | 2017-05-13 16:29:37 UTC | sorcrosc | Please add a comment to your changesets. A dot is not an explanatory comment |
| 2 | 2017-05-13 18:21:03 UTC | Carnildo | Or at the very least, use more dots. It's tricky to click on a changeset link that small. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-13 18:24:05 UTC | sorcrosc | Yes, more dots for all :) | |
| 48549085 by Lora Elliott | 1 | 2017-05-10 04:19:23 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for your contributions.Elevations in OpenStreetMap are always measured in meters. I've changed the elevation for Pendleton back, but keep it in mind for the future. |
| 48149112 by kh72022 | 1 | 2017-04-26 08:58:40 UTC | Carnildo | I noticed that you've mapped a number of things as "parking space". That's meant for mapping individual spaces in a parking lot; the tag for a parking lot is "car parking". |
| 47887666 by Ann4567 | 1 | 2017-04-18 06:31:41 UTC | Carnildo | I'm not sure what you were trying to do with this edit, but it left a number of roads stretched across the map. I've reverted the dragging, while leaving the change to the road type of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352858026 alone, but you should probably review things to make sure I got it rig... |
| 47848787 by lfn_3000 | 1 | 2017-04-16 22:13:26 UTC | Glassman | Please only add features that can be verified. I removed the parks and water features you added. I left all of your good edits. |
| 2 | 2017-04-17 07:39:33 UTC | Carnildo | Unless I missed something, there weren't any good edits. The two surviving changes (which I reverted) were to turn Hallmark Apartments from "landuse=residential" to "natural=residential", and turn Walla Walla University into a park. | |
| 47800105 by Mike Chamberlain | 1 | 2017-04-15 01:48:55 UTC | Glassman | Welcome to OSM - marking roads as private indicates that it is posted to allow only owners and others that are individually invited. If it's just a privately maintained road that anyone can use, you can add the tag operator= |
| 2 | 2017-04-15 06:56:10 UTC | Carnildo | This one's an odd case: the county has the name as "Highland *Drive*", which would imply a public road ("Lane" denotes a privately-owned road), but the parcel map doesn't have a right-of-way for it, instead showing it as running on private property. I don't recall a street sign ... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-15 18:46:10 UTC | Mike Chamberlain | The roads in question "belong" to our little community of 37 homes -- The Highlands Homeowners Association of Spokane. The history is a little complicated; details can be found here: https://highlandsha.wixsite.com/highlandsha/history.At present we are working with the new owners of ... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-16 00:16:50 UTC | Glassman | The SCOUT parcel information probably comes from the assessor's office while the basemap imagery with labels is from their gis data. Parcel data is strange. Skagit County has a road data layer that is made from parcels information. In places it is off by many feet. Keep up the great work updatin... | |
| 47366189 by steven1900 | 1 | 2017-04-02 07:03:26 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for your edits.The "name" field should only be used for actual names, not descriptions. To indicate that an area is a football field, you can give it the type "American Football Field", which lets it show up in searches for football fields, and lets mapping software d... |
| 47223514 by fidcastro | 1 | 2017-03-29 08:37:09 UTC | Carnildo | Wrong "Grandfather Mountain". The links you added were for one in North Carolina, not the one in Idaho. |
| 2 | 2017-04-18 09:41:32 UTC | fidcastro | Hi Carnildo, thank you for reverting the data. The attributes were added in error. I have reached out to OSM editors working in North Carolina. The other Grandfather Mountain is now searchable in nominatim and we are actively working to improve that data. Many thanks, Castro." | |
| 47109344 by markknp | 1 | 2017-03-24 23:43:50 UTC | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you're changing the river from the commonly-used "waterway=riverbank" to the rare "natural=riverbank"? |
| 2 | 2017-03-28 05:08:18 UTC | Carnildo | In the continued absence of a response, I've un-done this change. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-28 16:02:49 UTC | markknp | Carnildo, it was changed during testing of a software package. Is there a published standard or best practices for tags? They seem to be fairly random... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-28 18:25:12 UTC | Carnildo | The best place for finding out about existing tags is the wiki: for example, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:water or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank (there are two competing standards for tagging riverbanks: one groups them with lakes, ponds, and other water are... | |
| 47163503 by sebastic | 1 | 2017-03-27 08:39:41 UTC | Carnildo | Could you do this in smaller chunks? I suspect this changeset is responsible for deleting the banks of the Columbia River between John Day Dam and McNary Dam, but it's such a huge changeset that none of the usual review tools works well with it. |
| 2 | 2017-03-27 08:58:34 UTC | sebastic | The tags we simply moved from the outer ways to the relation.Can you be more specific (e.g. map link) where between John Day Dam & McNary Dam the riverbanks are missing? | |
| 3 | 2017-03-27 17:59:19 UTC | Carnildo | I've fixed it already, but about ten hours ago, the ways making up the relation created in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47194830#map=9/45.8153/-119.9671 had no tags and were not part of any relation. However, stale rendering of map tiles showed that they had recently been tagged and/or p... | |
| 47082748 by Caleb-G | 1 | 2017-03-23 20:49:44 UTC | Carnildo | Consensus is that unofficial trails should be mapped, but should be marked as "informal=yes" (and "access=no" if people aren't supposed to use them).See the discussion at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Social_path and the linked mailing list discuss... |
| 2 | 2017-03-23 22:21:40 UTC | Caleb-G | Thanks Carnildo. Being new here, I'm not aware of the best-practices. Is there a good method to roll it back, or should I just manually add it again as a new trail? | |
| 3 | 2017-03-24 03:30:20 UTC | Carnildo | I've reverted the deletion. There's a tool in the JOSM editor to do this, but it's a bit tricky to get right if you're only trying to undo part of a changeset. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-24 03:55:29 UTC | Caleb-G | Thank you! | |
| 46944517 by juuroku | 1 | 2017-03-18 00:52:29 UTC | Carnildo | You've turned I-90 into a tunnel across the entire state of Washington twice now. Whatever you're doing, stop it. |
| 2 | 2017-03-18 00:59:17 UTC | juuroku | I'm trying to properly layer the roadways in the MBRT in Seattle. Like most people, I'm learning OSM through experimentation. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-18 02:14:13 UTC | Carnildo | I'm not familiar with the Vespucci editor, but when you're changing the layer/tunnel information for I-90, make sure you're selecting an individual way making up the freeway, rather than the relation that groups all of the ways together into a single unit. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-18 03:45:31 UTC | juuroku | In Vespucci the individual ways and the relations appear on the same pick list when selecting a way to edit. Sometimes adjacent ways and relations appear as one big pick list. To a new person like me it isn't immediately apparent which are the ways and which are the relations. Switching to a desktop... | |
| 46923077 by radnaj | 1 | 2017-03-17 18:36:32 UTC | Carnildo | Gossard Field still exists -- "Juno Elevator Road" doubles as the runway, the building with the curved roof is a hangar, and the FAA says that five airplanes operate out of it. I've restored the airport node and improved the mapping. |
| 2 | 2017-03-17 21:34:57 UTC | radnaj | Thank you for double checking this and undoing my incorrect deletion, based on the imagery, and no visual evidences of the aerodrome | |
| 46858895 by Jason Roy | 1 | 2017-03-15 05:28:57 UTC | Carnildo | In addition to whatever you were trying to do (your changeset comment of "Fixed building" doesn't resemble your changes in the least), you dragged a node of an island off the coast of Alaska. Please be more careful in the future. |
| 2 | 2017-03-30 02:48:54 UTC | Jason Roy | Sorry about that, I accidentally uploaded a changeset form a previous edit. Thanks for letting me know, and I'll be more careful next time with dragging nodes. Thanks! | |
| 46802208 by OIVIFG | 1 | 2017-03-13 23:33:34 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't add fictitious data to the map. It wastes the time of those of us who have to clean it up. |
| 46794094 by Anders Hopperstead | 1 | 2017-03-13 23:19:09 UTC | Carnildo | If you want to practice editing, there's a development server you can use: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing |
| 46724204 by wilsamson12 | 1 | 2017-03-10 02:34:47 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't add false data to the map. It wastes the time of those of us who have to remove it. |
| 46535283 by Timothy Whidden | 1 | 2017-03-07 20:46:01 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't use a "." as the changeset comment. It's not very informative, and it's a pain to try to click on in the history view. |
| 46517941 by Timothy Whidden | 1 | 2017-03-02 21:08:21 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for your work improving the map!The usual way to map a school is to place the name of the school on the school grounds, but to not name school buildings unless they have their own, different name (eg. the "So-and-So Memorial Gymnasium"). |
| 46299985 by ManOfSpokane | 1 | 2017-02-22 09:56:39 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for your help with the map!A couple of notes:1) Parking lots should be mapped as "Car Parking". "Parking Space" is meant for the individual spaces if you're mapping a parking lot in fine detail.2) Please don't attach things such as school grounds to adjacent s... |
| 2 | 2017-02-22 21:31:26 UTC | ManOfSpokane | Thanks for the info Carnildo! Funny, I was typing in "parking" for the tag lookup expecting to see something like "parking lot" but the only thing that came up was "parking space". You would have thought the lookup feature would have shown "Car Parking" as w... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-23 05:57:38 UTC | Carnildo | Actually, I think the problem with the lookup feature is that it tries to be too smart: a search for "parking" does bring up "car parking", but it's mixed in with "car sharing", "charging station", "park", and other things that might or might not be ... | |
| 46321719 by pablopedia | 1 | 2017-02-23 01:58:43 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't add fictional content to the map. |
| 2 | 2017-02-23 06:10:40 UTC | nammala | Carnildo, Great you have cleaned up the data | |
| 46065577 by jmck7279 | 1 | 2017-02-14 06:50:09 UTC | Carnildo | You've drawn this building as overlapping two different houses. Which one is #9011? |
| 46062946 by rza31 | 1 | 2017-02-14 06:21:28 UTC | Carnildo | Did you mean to remove the "highway=" tag from East A Street in this edit? |
| 2 | 2017-02-14 08:07:24 UTC | rza31 | Hello Carnildo,thanks for notice. It was a mistake by mapping. | |
| 46043868 by kissackt | 1 | 2017-02-13 19:54:19 UTC | Carnildo | You appear to have forgotten to indicate what sort of thing this is. Mapping a bare address has some value, in that routing software can give directions to it, but it really helps if you add a "house" or "apartment" tag (or the generic "residential building" tag if you... |
| 45996283 by hofoen | 1 | 2017-02-11 20:38:20 UTC | Carnildo | Did you mean to mark a section of railroad as "abandoned" in this edit? The section near the Baird Springs Road tunnel doesn't look abandoned to me, just shadowed by the edge of the cutting. |
| 2 | 2017-02-12 13:00:04 UTC | hofoen | Thanks for the note. I fixed it. | |
| 45897335 by cetea | 1 | 2017-02-07 22:21:26 UTC | Carnildo | The "name" field should only be used to give the names of things, not to describe them. It's obvious from the tags that a path is a path, so you don't also need to name it "path". |
| 45795918 by Kelm | 1 | 2017-02-04 05:17:40 UTC | Carnildo | That does not look particularly park-like in aerial imagery, and the Pullman parks department is unaware of any park named "Egg Park", or of a park by any name in that location. |
| 45762803 by kwc123 | 1 | 2017-02-03 05:20:57 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for your work in mapping the less-populated parts of Idaho.OpenStreetMap measures elevations in meters, not feet, and lets end-user software decide what units to display it in. By changing the numbers for Stevens Peak, you've made it appear to be the tallest mountains in Idaho.(I've ... |
| 45763075 by kwc123 | 1 | 2017-02-03 05:06:43 UTC | Carnildo | For future reference, the correct tag for a parking lot or parking garage is "car parking" (amenity=parking). "Parking space" is for if you're mapping the individual spaces within a parking lot. |
| 45759543 by kissackt | 1 | 2017-02-03 04:44:24 UTC | Carnildo | In general, we don't record the ownership of private residences on the map. |
| 45697168 by Kblack2 | 1 | 2017-02-03 04:24:23 UTC | Carnildo | What was the assignment, to vandalize the map? I believe everything in this changeset has been deleted as having no basis in reality. |
| 45694457 by farawayoasis | 1 | 2017-02-01 07:15:08 UTC | Carnildo | Is it really called "Short Pointless Path"? |
| 45696077 by Kblack2 | 1 | 2017-02-01 01:25:08 UTC | Carnildo | Is there really a hospital in the Cheney Fire Department building? |
| 45596543 by sugabob3310 | 1 | 2017-01-28 19:51:02 UTC | Carnildo | The "name" field should only be used for the actual name of something. What sort of thing it is is indicated by tags such as "commercial area". |
| 45584807 by laylow506 | 1 | 2017-01-28 11:03:16 UTC | Carnildo | I've reverted this change. As best I can tell, the "park" is a vacant lot and the footway doesn't exist. Further, the change messed up the data for bus route #160 by adding the vacant lot to it. |
| 45584430 by Max V | 1 | 2017-01-28 10:51:11 UTC | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you think that the Centennial Trail is better classified as a footway than as a cycleway? Sure, it probably sees more foot traffic than bicycle traffic, but it's advertised as a cycle route, marked as a cycle route, and everyone knows it as a cycle route. |
| 45540679 by MikeEspinoza | 1 | 2017-01-27 05:41:58 UTC | Carnildo | If you put the address in the address field rather than the name field, route-finding software can use it when users enter it as their destination. |
| 45536780 by cetea | 1 | 2017-01-27 02:21:38 UTC | Carnildo | Are you sure about the park you added just north of the cemetery? It looks to me like it's just somebody's house. |
| 45530800 by Valiant208 | 1 | 2017-01-27 01:20:55 UTC | Carnildo | The "name" field should only be used for actual names. Attributes such as "this is a sidewalk" are indicated by appropriate tagging. |
| 45496764 by jagather1 | 1 | 2017-01-26 11:27:42 UTC | Carnildo | A "Code Blue Emergency Station" sounds like it should be tagged as an "emergency phone" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dphone). Is this correct? |
| 2 | 2017-01-31 18:39:24 UTC | jagather1 | Yes, it does seem like a better fit. I changed them to emergency phones after reading the wiki-link. Thank you. | |
| 45494353 by eridley | 1 | 2017-01-26 11:21:35 UTC | Carnildo | Cheney Community Church is mapped twice here, once as a node with an address of 205 Pine Street, and once as a building with an address of 1307 3rd Street. Which one is correct? |
| 45480736 by Kevinmccormick | 1 | 2017-01-25 22:09:51 UTC | Carnildo | Please only map things that actually exist.I don't know if the watercourse you've modified is better mapped as a "stream" or a "ditch", but I'm confident enough that there isn't a meadow, a pond, a lake, or a Reformed Zoroastrian temple at the intersection of Third and Roosev... |
| 45450596 by Kingsmj | 1 | 2017-01-24 22:10:32 UTC | Carnildo | Is there an actual park here? On the aerial imagery, it looks like it's just a vacant lot. |
| 45226779 by fduvelson | 1 | 2017-01-17 05:06:14 UTC | Carnildo | You appear to have re-named the United States in this changeset. Consequently, I've reverted it. |
| 35564696 by Methow Trails | 1 | 2017-01-10 09:14:17 UTC | Carnildo | You've mapped a long section of Radar Creek as a bridge here. Is this accurate (an extended boardwalk or similar), or an error? |
| 44918585 by PHerison | 1 | 2017-01-05 21:43:40 UTC | Carnildo | Are you sure about "Indian Prairie School"? Aerial imagery shows something that looks more garage-like than school-like, none of the local school districts has an "Indian Prairie School", and I can't find anything about it on the web. |
| 2 | 2017-01-05 22:08:12 UTC | PHerison | This was just a merge of node 356540317 and way 311148180. I've no information about "Indian Prairie School". | |
| 3 | 2017-01-06 07:51:21 UTC | Carnildo | Upon further investigation, that building is Spokane County Fire District 10's station #3. I've updated the map.The node in question was from the GNIS import, a data source almost as problematic as TIGER, but less well-known. Looking at the associated record in the GNIS website, it was added t... | |
| 44249131 by nyuriks | 1 | 2016-12-08 05:54:36 UTC | Carnildo | Some of these tags don't seem to be appropriate. For example, "Hillside" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6071193) and "Walker's Point" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6029898) both have the Wikidata tag "Q6988108", which is "Neighborhoods of Milwau... |
| 2 | 2017-01-04 22:35:06 UTC | nyuriks | Carnildo, thanks, totally forgot about this issue - I have easily found all affected items using relation["wikipedia"~"#"]["wikidata"]["admin_level"];query. That said, these are not incorrect Wikidata IDs, they are simply less then accurate, and should be... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-05 11:16:31 UTC | nyuriks | Ok, done - all Milwaukee neighborhoods (wikidata=Q6988108) have been fixed - i created wd items for them | |
| 4 | 2017-01-05 21:11:40 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks -- that seems like the best solution. | |
| 44737030 by Able05 | 1 | 2016-12-30 19:39:40 UTC | skorasaurus | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Nice details and edits here on the golf course. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask at help.openstreetmap.org Regards,Will (from Cleveland) |
| 2 | 2016-12-30 20:06:08 UTC | Able05 | Thank you. It's sure taking some time to work through the course. I am new to this, so it may very well likely be widely-known, but I find it cumbersome to edit some of these things. For example, when adding a sand bunker, it seems unnecessary to have to add both golf=bunker and natural=sand since t... | |
| 3 | 2016-12-31 20:34:39 UTC | Carnildo | The JOSM editor (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) lets you set up tag presets to apply as many tags as you want in one action, but it's got its own steep learning curve. | |
| 44769973 by KDyer | 1 | 2016-12-29 23:07:31 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for adding to the map!A tip for better mapping: if a path meets a road, make sure the two are connected (the connection will show up as a grey dot in the editor). This lets routing software know that it's possible to get from one to the other, and use the path when finding walking direct... |
| 44695262 by AT4TWalker | 1 | 2016-12-27 13:15:22 UTC | upendrakarukonda | Hi AT4TWalker,Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contribution is appreciable. It's better not to use proprietary sources for mapping in OpenStreetMap. Regards,Upendra. |
| 2 | 2016-12-29 06:05:06 UTC | Carnildo | Besides, in my experience, Google often gets park boundaries spectacularly wrong. | |
| 44600797 by ncmh91 | 1 | 2016-12-23 19:57:16 UTC | DavidKewley | Hi ncmh91, looks like you removed a runway and associated taxiway, and shrunk the airport grounds accordingly. Could you provide a URL describing this change in the real world? I'm still seeing references on the web to the removed runway, and I'm not (immediately) finding references to its being rem... |
| 2 | 2016-12-24 08:30:22 UTC | Carnildo | Bing, Mapbox, and USGS imagery all have "X"s at the ends of the runway, indicating long-term closure. The FAA master record for the airport (http://www.gcr1.com/5010ReportRouter/default.aspx?airportID=ILN) also notes that runway 4R/22L is closed "until further notice".It's p... | |
| 3 | 2016-12-24 19:27:47 UTC | DavidKewley | OK, cool, I've learned something today. Thanks Carnildo! | |
| 4 | 2016-12-24 23:42:19 UTC | ncmh91 | Thanks Carnildo for helping clear this up! | |
| 44637936 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-12-24 05:49:49 UTC | Carnildo | Are you *sure* this is tertiary? Aerial imagery shows a one-lane gravel road. |
| 44532178 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-12-20 07:18:27 UTC | Carnildo | Whatever you did to the Waikiki Road bridge over the Little Spokane, it broke the Fairwood boundary relation. I've fixed it, but please be more careful in the future. |
| 43024691 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-12-19 05:18:15 UTC | Carnildo | What's your basis for mapping Cliff Drive as a one-way street? It sure looked two-way this afternoon. |
| 44479681 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-12-18 01:28:31 UTC | Carnildo | Spokane County's municipal boundary map (http://www.spokanecounty.org/DocumentCenter/View/116) isn't the most detailed in the world, but it seems to think that the original Spangle city limits were correct -- that yes, the southern boundary does cut diagonally through a field. |
| 44463097 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-12-17 10:30:10 UTC | Carnildo | Err, no.Anyone driving Dike Bypass and expecting a trunk road will be very surprised to find themselves on a narrow two-lane road with assorted driveways coming off it. |
| 44415343 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-12-15 09:48:05 UTC | Carnildo | Um, no.Crown Point may or may not be a state highway; I've got no information on that. But it is not in any way a secondary highway. It is a short stub of paved road providing access to a minor park and a pair of dirt roads. |
| 44408917 by Ron Weeks | 1 | 2016-12-15 09:32:19 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for updating these roads.If a road is entirely closed to heavy-truck traffic, you can indicate that by adding a tag of "hgv" with a value of "no"; if it's closed except for local deliveries, you'd use a value of "destination".The iD editor doesn't have a ... |
| 44378029 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-12-13 21:48:50 UTC | Carnildo | The lower terminal of the Skyride is a military area? Sorry to put it so bluntly, but what the hell? |
| 2 | 2016-12-13 21:53:11 UTC | Carnildo | Additionally, where are you getting the name "White Park" from? As far as I can tell, it's just a stray piece of city-owned riverbank. | |
| 44364237 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-12-13 07:30:47 UTC | Carnildo | Um, what?Last time I drove past, that sure looked like a statue of Abraham Lincoln. |
| 44328901 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-12-12 02:02:04 UTC | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset.1) To the best of my knowledge, the Spokane city limits run down the west side of Haven, not the centerline.2) Adding a "landuse=commercial" polygon on top of the Spokane County Fair polygon violates the principle that one OSM object should correspond to ... |
| 44319711 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-12-11 23:02:53 UTC | Carnildo | Are you sure all of this is Spalding Auto Parts? The fencelines and different car-parking patterns look like they could belong to two different junkyards. |
| 44241301 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-12-07 23:05:14 UTC | Carnildo | A mini-roundabout is a type of junction between multiple streets. For a roundabout-type structure at the end of a street, mark it as a "turning loop". |
| 44193358 by Postfallshd | 1 | 2016-12-05 23:59:25 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't abbreviate street names. It's easy enough for a computer to turn a full name into an abbreviated one if it needs to save space, but going the other direction can be difficult or impossible. For example, should "St" be expanded to "Street", or "Saint"? |
| 44166825 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-12-04 23:02:45 UTC | Carnildo | I've partially reverted this changeset. The Bing imagery for Sprague is out of date -- the intersection at the northwest corner of the town has been re-worked into a conventional four-way intersection with a driveway coming out of it. |
| 43314846 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-11-18 14:18:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've added a "landuse=forest" tag to http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1447414#map=15/47.9626/-120.2074 - is that really correct? The relation is "Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest" i.e. it's a protected area - a "National Forest" in US terms, but that d... |
| 2 | 2016-11-29 19:47:13 UTC | Carnildo | I don't think it does. Like most national forests, Okanogan-Wenatchee is used for a mix of logging, ranching, mining, hunting, and other things. There are dedicated recreation areas and dedicated wilderness areas, and areas that are de-facto one or the other (generally due to inaccessibility), and... | |
| 44020638 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-11-28 23:05:07 UTC | Carnildo | I repeat: is there a reason why you do not consider these roads to be tertiary? |
| 43930461 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-11-24 21:07:01 UTC | Carnildo | Re-removed park. Source: I went there, looked, and saw a collection of parking lots."North Bank Park" isn't the only erroneous park on that map. Mr. Kozlov would be rather upset if you used it as the basis for mapping his house as part of Palisades; similarly, people would be confuse... |
| 2 | 2016-11-24 23:08:43 UTC | Howpper | Ok, I understand. | |
| 43888363 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-11-23 10:29:05 UTC | Carnildo | ..."North Bank Park"? I've never heard of it, and as far as I can tell, neither has the Parks Department. |
| 2 | 2016-11-24 05:30:07 UTC | Carnildo | Drove by it today and found several parking lots, but no park. The only place where I've been able to find a park in this area is in the master plan for redevelopment of Riverfront Park, and that's not scheduled to take place until 2018. I've deleted the park. | |
| 43885634 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-11-23 08:54:23 UTC | Carnildo | Are you sure Crestline between 11th and 15th doesn't exist? Aerial imagery certainly shows something street-like. |
| 43883676 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-11-23 04:18:19 UTC | BharataHS | Hey Howpper,Your efforts on adding data on to OSM is deeply appreciated. Could you please let the community know, the reason behind deleting a lake which is visible in Bing satellite imagery. Thank you. |
| 2 | 2016-11-23 04:33:09 UTC | Carnildo | Not just satellite imagery. I've got a half-dozen photographs of it at various times this year. | |
| 43863777 by Omnific | 1 | 2016-11-22 10:41:29 UTC | Carnildo | At least one of these still existed in October -- at least in the form of a sign on a store. I didn't check to see if it was still open for business, as I was navigating a busy parking lot at the time. |
| 43649209 by Tgd108 | 1 | 2016-11-16 18:52:55 UTC | neuhausr | Did you mistype? Either the name or the tag is wrong |
| 2 | 2016-11-16 22:03:20 UTC | Tgd108 | Sorry. The tag is wrong. Didn't set it as post office intentionally. It is a music store. Couldn't find which tag to put for that. First location for me. Will try to figure out how to repair it. Thanks for the heads up. | |
| 3 | 2016-11-19 20:32:58 UTC | Carnildo | The tag would be either Music Store ("shop=music", for a store that sells CDs, vinyl records, etc.), or Music Instrument Store ("shop=musical_instrument", for a store that sells instruments and related things). I don't know if the Maps.Me editor has presets for these, but the iD... | |
| 43756087 by SusanWi | 1 | 2016-11-18 10:35:29 UTC | user_5359 | Welcome to OSM! You paint a new way over a existing street (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53411280). And the name "P-1302 Access Road to Soccer Park (RRE Homeowner Association)“ isn’t a name, this is a description! What is wrong with the highway "Eastridge Drive NE"? |
| 2 | 2016-11-18 21:12:36 UTC | SusanWi | According to the Redmond Ridge East plat, Eastridge Drive ends at the roundabout where it connects to 244th Place NE. The section of road to the south/southeast of the roundabout is an access road on parcel 720322-0620 that belongs to the Redmond Ridge East homeowners association. It is not an ext... | |
| 3 | 2016-11-19 20:20:59 UTC | Carnildo | Since you're using the iD editor, you can split a road into two parts by clicking on the road, then shift-clicking on the dot at the appropriate place to split the road (if there isn't one, you can drag the nearest triangle icon on the road to create one). Then, click the "scissors" icon ... | |
| 43806413 by Michael Minn | 1 | 2016-11-19 20:05:59 UTC | Carnildo | The "name" field should only be used for the name of the object, and nothing else -- computers don't understand that a suffix of "(Closed)" means that a gas station is closed, and so it will still show up in searches.The customary way to indicate that a business has been clos... |
| 43785121 by Natfoot | 1 | 2016-11-19 03:03:02 UTC | Carnildo | Did you mis-type the tags for the signals here? |
| 2 | 2016-11-19 03:14:36 UTC | Natfoot | apparently autocorrect was not happy. | |
| 43780043 by Anonymity | 1 | 2016-11-18 22:51:17 UTC | Carnildo | When mapping businesses, it's useful to indicate what sort of business it is, to make it easier to find. For example, "Roger's Towing & Recovery", in addition to being a building, is probably also a "car repair shop" (tag "shop", value "car_repair"). |
| 43755847 by MirouStar | 1 | 2016-11-18 08:43:55 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for adding speed limits -- it's nice to know I'm not the only one who cares about them. |
| 43674302 by BY3to1 | 1 | 2016-11-15 19:51:13 UTC | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you placed two wastebaskets in apparently-random parts of Area 51? |
| 43658405 by Auswanderer | 1 | 2016-11-15 05:15:54 UTC | Carnildo | "shop=cannabis" is the more-common way of tagging marijuana stores (120+ uses versus 12). I've gone ahead and changed it. |
| 43654600 by Carson321 | 1 | 2016-11-15 05:09:36 UTC | Carnildo | You're not allowed to use Google Maps as a source for mapping. The data isn't under an open license, and Google could react in legally unpleasant ways to people copying it. |
| 43653855 by JoshGIS301 | 1 | 2016-11-15 04:42:12 UTC | Carnildo | The more information you can provide about something, the easier it is for people to find it. For example, in addition to marking the building as being a commercial building, you could tag it as a bank, and indicate that it's got an ATM (or not). |
| 43592230 by Erikk Machowek | 1 | 2016-11-13 00:57:32 UTC | Carnildo | Two issues with this edit:1) "Simple changes" isn't a very descriptive comment. If I'm reading the changes correctly, a more accurate comment would be something like "added points of interest".2) Elevations in OSM are measured in meters, not feet. Your change to the sum... |
| 43518053 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-11-09 20:00:51 UTC | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you don't want 13th/Rosamond/West/Westcliff/Deska classified as tertiary? The route has an elevated speed limit, right-of-way over intersecting minor roads, and is classified by the city as an arterial -- all indications that it should be tagged as "tertiary". |
| 43507043 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-11-09 19:19:42 UTC | Carnildo | Where are you getting the name "Grand Junction" and the presence of a stop sign on a railroad from? |
| 43500792 by bpoepping | 1 | 2016-11-09 00:15:08 UTC | Carnildo | Is this a fire station? Fire stations have their own building type, so they can be indicated as such with an appropriate icon or other marking. |
| 43500787 by bubblyjoe | 1 | 2016-11-09 00:11:19 UTC | Carnildo | The "name" field should only be used for names, not descriptions. Most parking lots don't have names. |
| 43500387 by Sticks09 | 1 | 2016-11-08 23:56:56 UTC | Carnildo | Buildings should not be placed inside other buildings -- it makes it hard for map renderers to draw things correctly. The preferred way to map a building containing multiple businesses is to draw the outline as a generic building, then add a "point" feature for each business. |
| 43500300 by Anonymity | 1 | 2016-11-08 23:51:58 UTC | Carnildo | Is the name of this actually "Residential Development"? The "name" field for objects should only be used for actual names, not descriptions. |
| 43479919 by Michael Minn | 1 | 2016-11-08 08:43:33 UTC | Carnildo | Wouldn't it make more sense to draw a "landuse=residential" around the entire apartment complex and name it "Eagle Point Apartments", rather than putting the apartment-complex name on each building individually? |
| 43370521 by MasterMadi | 1 | 2016-11-03 06:35:41 UTC | Carnildo | "I Street" is already on the map as a residential road. What were you trying to do here? |
| 43365197 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-11-02 22:38:20 UTC | Carnildo | The "apartments" tag is for apartment *buildings*, not apartment *complexes*. Applying it to an apartment complex causes the complex to be drawn as a single very large building. |
| 43292091 by bas57 | 1 | 2016-10-30 22:27:04 UTC | Carnildo | Is this actually a road named "private driveway"? If it's an ordinary driveway, the correct way to mark it as such is a road type of "driveway" with an allowed access of "private". The "name" field should only be used for actual names. |
| 43235599 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-28 07:35:20 UTC | Carnildo | Since when has Pinecroft Natural Area Preserve been a military area? |
| 2 | 2016-10-28 21:57:42 UTC | Howpper | I did this because the area is not open to the public, and it was meant to represent a restricted area. | |
| 43234430 by Cody McClung | 1 | 2016-10-28 03:32:33 UTC | Carnildo | The classification of places is based on their size, not on the official name. That said, I agree that Pullman is probably large enough to be classified as a city rather than a town. |
| 43223377 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-27 18:37:16 UTC | Carnildo | Landuse tags should indicate "what it's actually used for", not "what it's zoned for". |
| 43147311 by Carnildo | 1 | 2016-10-26 16:21:18 UTC | Howpper | I see what you mean, the part north of I-90 was once part of the park, but no longer officially is, but according to "https://maps.spokanecity.org/", the part north of Liberty Park Place is part of the park. Is this incorrect? |
| 2 | 2016-10-26 19:36:58 UTC | Carnildo | Based on the Liberty Park map at https://my.spokanecity.org/parks/finder/, it's not part of the park.I haven't been to the park recently, but aerial imagery shows the block north of Liberty Park Place as a brown, weed-filled lot, where the area south of the road is well-watered, well-maintained ... | |
| 43199454 by Carnildo | 1 | 2016-10-26 18:58:27 UTC | Howpper | I found it on an old city map. It must be an old name. "http://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/detail/RUMSEY~8~1~212309~5500347:Downtown-Spokane--Street-Map-of-Spo;JSESSIONID=0ae03a53-2ba6-4218-be98-5f0dfd7208e9?showTipAdvancedSearch=false&showShareIIIFLink=true&showTip=false&helpU... |
| 2 | 2016-10-26 19:28:59 UTC | Carnildo | That map dates from 1956, back when Havermale Island was an industrial area surrounding a railroad station. The island was completely re-shaped for the 1974 World's Fair, and is currently undergoing another major renovation. | |
| 43015669 by Darrell | 1 | 2016-10-20 11:25:55 UTC | Paul Johnson | Maybe this should be undeleted, and instead retagged as a brownfield site. Deleting the property also removes the address, which is still valid for this site. |
| 2 | 2016-10-21 05:15:15 UTC | Paul Johnson | If there's no objection, I will be reverting this edit to restore the deleted address. | |
| 3 | 2016-10-22 07:24:39 UTC | Carnildo | I've used the "destroyed" lifecycle prefix (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) for buildings that have been burned down or otherwise destroyed by disaster. It's common for them to be rebuilt on the same foundation with the same roof outline, and this preserves the infor... | |
| 4 | 2016-10-22 13:38:55 UTC | Paul Johnson | That's probably a good idea on this building, since it is *Very* much destroyed, and damaged most of the buildings within the vicinity (I've heard reports of damage as far up as Irving in one direction and Everett in the other). The building itself looks like it basically exploded, fell into it's o... | |
| 43046955 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-21 03:14:19 UTC | Carnildo | I don't think it's accurate to describe this section of MLK Way as "open for traffic": as of half an hour ago, the "road closed" construction barriers were still up at the intersection with Sherman. |
| 42949554 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-17 06:48:44 UTC | Carnildo | "boundary=national_park" is a general-purpose "large protected area" tag. The "protected_area" tagging system gives more precision, but until more map renderers understand it, double-tagging national forests as national parks is fairly standard practice."bound... |
| 42403456 by emka57 | 1 | 2016-10-14 20:47:47 UTC | Carnildo | The correct tagging for a geyser is "natural=geyser", not "natural=volcano". |
| 42191665 by schloss | 1 | 2016-10-10 17:50:22 UTC | Johnny Mapperseed | Have you confirmed their location with an on the ground survey? I hate to be a bummer, but the bing sat imagery is of downtown before significant renovations. Basically none of it is good anymore, unless you've recently been on the ground and know what remains and what has changed.Anyway thanks ... |
| 2 | 2016-10-11 17:40:02 UTC | schloss | I have confirmed the location of these trees both by visiting Kent recently, and by referencing Google's aerial imagery when making the change, which Is far more up to date than Bing's. | |
| 3 | 2016-10-13 09:13:14 UTC | Carnildo | Don't do that -- Google isn't on the list of acceptable sources. If you need more recent imagery, Mapbox Satellite and USGS Large Scale Imagery both tend to be newer than Bing, and are freely usable (if lower resolution). | |
| 42846857 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-13 05:58:05 UTC | Carnildo | By what stretch of the imagination does Spokane have a population of nearly three-quarters of a million people? |
| 2 | 2016-10-13 16:23:42 UTC | Howpper | I was counting the Spokane-Coeur d'Alene Combined Statistical Area. Now I see that it should have the population of the city proper. | |
| 42820374 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-12 06:45:02 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't attach things to roads that aren't actually part of the road, like you did with Greenacres Elementary in this edit. It makes it a pain to edit those roads to to add things like speed-limit changes. |
| 42746530 by Carnildo | 1 | 2016-10-10 00:33:17 UTC | Natfoot | Carnildo, I drove through there as well today. Any idea why there is no railway on that bridge? railway=rail ? |
| 2 | 2016-10-10 02:11:29 UTC | Carnildo | Probably an editing mix-up. | |
| 42666948 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-09 04:42:32 UTC | Carnildo | Where did you get the idea that there was a traffic signal at the intersection of Spokane Falls and Sherman? It was a four-way stop when I drove through this afternoon. |
| 42746126 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-09 04:28:12 UTC | Carnildo | I don't know what this building is supposed to represent, but there's no building there. I've deleted it. |
| 42743060 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-09 01:45:02 UTC | Carnildo | Mount Spokane Park Drive is not primary. It is not really secondary, it is merely customary to describe state highways as such. Tertiary would be reasonable, as would "unclassified".It's a winding rural road that doesn't go much of anywhere. It is certainly not "a road that lin... |
| 2 | 2016-10-09 01:51:55 UTC | Carnildo | This particular stretch of road is a badly-potholed two-lane road with no markings, that connects only to a ski-area parking lot (closed in the summer) and a small group of summer homes. | |
| 42727583 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-09 00:49:12 UTC | Carnildo | I drove past both ends of this bridge today, and saw no signs of construction. Further, according to the most recent newspaper articles I've seen, it's still in the "where can we get ten million dollars?" stage of construction.According to OSM standards, that means it should be mapped... |
| 42727121 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-08 19:05:37 UTC | Carnildo | The "link" road classification is only for "links": short stretches of connecting road. See the wiki articles: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link |
| 42726134 by kartino rempas | 1 | 2016-10-08 05:02:24 UTC | Carnildo | I don't know what you were trying to do here, but stretching a building across half the world clearly isn't right. I've reverted it. |
| 42673982 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-06 05:39:31 UTC | Carnildo | Is there really a traffic signal there, or did you mis-mark a railroad crossing? |
| 42670359 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-06 01:01:17 UTC | Carnildo | Columbus Street is one-way northbound. There is no southbound entrance into the roundabout. |
| 42668080 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-10-05 21:41:51 UTC | Carnildo | Planned routes should be "highway=proposed", "proposed=". The "construction" tag should only be used when actual building is taking place, not when the current status is "being heavily debated". |
| 42437517 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-09-29 01:35:32 UTC | Carnildo | This edit broke the railroad bridge over Cannon Street, making it run east-west and connecting it to 5th Avenue. I've fixed it, but please try to be more careful in the future. |
| 42483711 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-09-28 02:49:42 UTC | Carnildo | Where in the world did you get the idea that Spokane has over a half-million people? |
| 42434791 by SeanTrek | 1 | 2016-09-26 17:41:43 UTC | Carnildo | I've converted "Gate" into a gate, and deleted "Bike" and "Sean", based on available imagery. The bench may be redundant, or there may be two benches in the area, and Mapbox imagery shows something that might be a rest area near the "rest area" POI. |
| 42336437 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-09-22 03:49:28 UTC | Carnildo | Why did you delete the lake here? It was very much in existence as of May 7, 2016. |
| 42273368 by SathyaPendyala | 1 | 2016-09-19 16:55:43 UTC | Carnildo | Where did you get your information about the pond you added near Warden? The aerial imagery looks to me like it's farmland, not water. |
| 2 | 2016-09-19 17:03:45 UTC | SathyaPendyala | Are you referring to the change set 42273368? It's a baseball field. | |
| 3 | 2016-09-19 19:09:25 UTC | Carnildo | I'm referring to way 443209289: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443209289 | |
| 4 | 2016-09-19 20:41:39 UTC | SathyaPendyala | Yes. You're absolutely correct. It's just farmland. It's my mistake. Thanks for pointing that. | |
| 42103555 by Cellsworth | 1 | 2016-09-17 04:35:08 UTC | Carnildo | According to my photos and notes from last week, you're right. |
| 42070241 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-09-14 03:16:30 UTC | Carnildo | This section of Sprague is very definitely not a secondary road. It's a narrow residential street that qualifies as "tertiary" only because traffic on it has the right-of-way over that on any of the intersecting streets. |
| 42070535 by Howpper | 1 | 2016-09-13 17:47:33 UTC | Carnildo | Where are you getting these "Clark" addresses from? As far as I can tell from searching on the Internet, the Keller Ferry campground and other things in the area have "Wilber" addresses. |
| 41855687 by PockletSandThroatKick | 1 | 2016-09-01 21:34:08 UTC | Carnildo | When recording the names of streets, the usual practice is to fully expand abbreviations. It's easy for an end-user to condense "avenue" to "ave" if they need it, but rather harder to tell if "St" should be "street" or "saint".See http://wiki.op... |
| 41837315 by reecee | 1 | 2016-09-01 04:18:52 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for adding this -- I don't know how I missed it when I was mapping the area earlier this year. My mapping notes show both ends of it, but somehow, I never followed up on mapping the actual trail.Is "bridle path" the actual name for it? When I've been mapping things in Riversid... |
| 2 | 2016-09-01 13:06:07 UTC | reecee | Glad to be able to help. Good point. I don't know that there is an actual name for the trail, just that it is within the horse / hiker only boundaries. I think your idea is best. I'll try to remove the name and just leave the trail type. | |
| 41837363 by reecee | 1 | 2016-09-01 04:08:32 UTC | Carnildo | What's your source for the names here? "Equestrian Lane" is what's on the street signs for the road intersecting Trails/Government Way while "Aubrey L. White" is on the big, fancy, non-official sign. The road leading to the equestrian area doesn't have any name that I've been a... |
| 41818523 by jhockett10119 | 1 | 2016-08-31 18:06:22 UTC | Carnildo | I don't think "Servpro of Northwest Spokane" is part of the roadway of Fir Avenue. Could you move it to the building the business is in and mark it with the appropriate business type?The reason you're not seeing the list of business types in the editor is because you've literally att... |
| 41569837 by GwennDragon | 1 | 2016-08-21 09:15:54 UTC | Carnildo | I *really* don't like the idea of calling Riverside State Park a "national park": it's an administrative conglomerate of all sorts of things, ranging from the highly-protected Little Spokane area, to Parks Department land, to DNR campgrounds, to land owned by Avista that was logged earlier... |
| 2 | 2016-08-21 21:01:58 UTC | GwennDragon | I'm fairly confident that this tag is correct, and I'm willing to stand by it. Allow me to explain my reasoning. Like leisure=nature_reserve, boundary=national_park is used more broadly than the normal English interpretation of the phrase would suggest. It is generally used for any government-declar... | |
| 3 | 2016-08-27 05:56:22 UTC | Carnildo | I think someone should invent a time machine so I can go back in time and swat whoever thought "national_park" was a good tag name for "large, generally wilderness-style recreation area". | |
| 41480465 by naimon | 1 | 2016-08-16 04:05:07 UTC | Carnildo | Is this a ski lift, or a trail following a lift? The usual tagging for lifts is "aerialway=chair_lift" (or other "aerialway=" tags for other types of lift; see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Piste_Maps#Ski_lifts) |
| 2 | 2016-08-16 17:10:14 UTC | naimon | It's a trail following an old ski lift. | |
| 41461656 by Natfoot | 1 | 2016-08-16 03:39:48 UTC | Carnildo | I'm not comfortable with armchair-mapping the trails in Mount Spokane State Park.1) There's been some re-alignment and closure of trails in the park in the past decade. Some Strava tracks correspond to routes that are now closed.2) Some of the trails in the park are former logging roads tha... |
| 41459988 by Natfoot | 1 | 2016-08-15 06:24:15 UTC | Carnildo | Did something go wrong with this edit? You've got a couple of nodes tagged as "railway=signalGEIGER JCT". |
| 2 | 2016-08-15 06:39:33 UTC | Natfoot | Yes it did, Thank You | |
| 41305745 by MappingJunkie | 1 | 2016-08-08 03:09:31 UTC | Carnildo | Are you sure you've got "Boat Ramp" tagged properly? The name and position imply it's a "leisure=slipway", but you've marked it as an "amenity=parking". |
| 41051155 by GwennDragon | 1 | 2016-07-27 06:47:53 UTC | Carnildo | Are you sure "nature reserve" is the correct classification? When I was mapping the trails, I had to dodge cattle herds a few times -- not something I'd expect to do on a nature reserve. |
| 2 | 2016-08-06 03:42:07 UTC | GwennDragon | The OSM tag leisure=nature_reserve is used a bit more broadly than the usual meaning of the term would suggest. Still, I agree that it is a bit of a stretch. Before my edit, it was labeled with boundary=protected_area & protect_class=27 (Generic public land), which did not render on the map. I o... | |
| 3 | 2016-08-06 06:45:39 UTC | Carnildo | I was hoping you'd know of a better tagging. This sort of situation is exactly the sort of thing "protect_class" is supposed to be for; too bad getting it to render has been an unresolved issue for years. | |
| 41202315 by GwennDragon | 1 | 2016-08-03 04:52:07 UTC | Carnildo | There are some major problems with this edit:1) Indian Canyon Park does not exist except on paper. On the ground, every entrance sign, boundary marker, and trailhead map calls it part of Palisades Park.2) The boundaries you have for "Indian Canyon Park" don't match either the on-t... |
| 2 | 2016-08-06 02:59:56 UTC | GwennDragon | First the lesser matter: I reclassified the trail that connects from Rimrock Drive to Trail 120 (which I originally added to the map a few years ago), for two primary reasons. First, it is not one of the parks official trails, and is thus not marked, does not show up on the official maps, and is not... | |
| 3 | 2016-08-06 03:08:35 UTC | GwennDragon | As for the rest of my edit, I am honestly unsure of what would be the best way to mark the park boundaries. From one perspective, the separate units have separate ownership and should be marked as separate entities, even if they are managed as a unit "Palisades Park" is not a true, singula... | |
| 4 | 2016-08-06 03:19:21 UTC | GwennDragon | For the most part, I would be supportive of reverting my edit, except for two changes. First, the area approximately bounded by the railroad, Greenwood, and Trail 101 is private property, despite what the Palisades map says. I wasn't aware of this until recently when I ran into a man and his family ... | |
| 5 | 2016-08-06 03:22:43 UTC | GwennDragon | Thanks for bringing these things to my attention! It's good to know that I'm not alone in my efforts to map the area. I'm on a self-imposed break from mapping for a while, so you can make changes if you like, or I'll come back and fix everything up in a week. | |
| 6 | 2016-08-06 06:43:29 UTC | Carnildo | My personal choice would be to combine the Indian Canyon and Palisades sections under the name "Palisades Park" (since that's what's on all the signs), while leaving Rimrock Conservation Area.Most of the Greenwood/101/Railroad area is legally part of Greenwood Cemetery, but is de-facto... | |
| 41201727 by GwennDragon | 1 | 2016-08-03 00:23:53 UTC | Carnildo | Are the trails you've added here based on actual GPS traces or on-the-ground observations? What you've drawn looks like the trails that *should* exist according to the county's maps, but when I visited earlier this year, I was unable to locate the trail leading from the parking area, and I didn't h... |
| 2 | 2016-08-06 02:31:43 UTC | GwennDragon | My edits are based on the county map. I have not actually been to this park in person yet, though I've been across the river many times. If you want to remove any of the trails I marked which you think are inaccurate, that's okay with me. | |
| 3 | 2016-08-06 05:33:02 UTC | Carnildo | I plan to head out there this weekend, and I'll be updating the map based on what I find. | |
| 41201388 by GwennDragon | 1 | 2016-08-03 07:27:28 UTC | Carnildo | Where are you getting the boundaries of Sontag Park from? The boundaries on the ground are a bit fuzzy in the area, but as far as I can tell, most of what you've got as Sontag is actually part of Riverside State Park.In particular, the parking area at 47.78397 N, 117.54904 W is definitely part ... |
| 2 | 2016-08-06 02:50:58 UTC | GwennDragon | I've been to Sontag Park, but it was long enough ago that my memory of it is hazy. I based my edit on the map from Spokane County Parks & Recreation (https://www.spokanecounty.org/DocumentCenter/View/4069). Upon checking Riverside's own map and the state BLM data, I believe that you are most lik... | |
| 3 | 2016-08-06 05:27:08 UTC | Carnildo | Sontag Park's a bit tricky: ownership of the land it's on is split between Nine Mile Falls School District and the State Parks Department.My decision on where to split between "Nine Mile Elementary", "Sontag Park", and "Riverside State Park" was somewhat arbitrary: ... | |
| 41196084 by MappingJunkie | 1 | 2016-08-03 07:42:23 UTC | Carnildo | Page Airport appears to be gone: the older Bing and Mapbox imagery shows whiteXs at the ends of the runway indicating closure, while large parts of the runway appear overgrown in the latest Mapbox images. |
| 41197664 by MappingJunkie | 1 | 2016-08-03 07:37:50 UTC | Carnildo | Are you sure about the in-use status of this runway? The white Xs painted at the ends of the runway in the latest imagery indicate long-term closure, in which case it should probably be tagged as "disused:aeroway=runway" |
| 41119963 by MappingJunkie | 1 | 2016-07-30 08:47:55 UTC | Carnildo | Did you forget to add tags to this? |
| 2 | 2016-07-30 19:35:22 UTC | MappingJunkie | Thanks for noticing. This is a work in progress that requires loading lots of GeoTiffs. Since the boundary is not complete, I will leave it un-tagged until it is ready for publication. | |
| 40922008 by ridixcr | 1 | 2016-07-21 20:26:19 UTC | Carnildo | Please pay attention when dealing with this sort of mis-tagged way. Yes, it was mis-tagged as a quarry. But it is also mis-tagged as a mineshaft, a ditch, a peak, and an incorrectly-named road. |
| 2 | 2016-07-22 20:39:57 UTC | ridixcr | As I commented in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40909243, I removed only the landuse=quarry because I fixing broken polygons. And in the same way, I've already reverted my edit here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40922008. Thanks for your feedback again. | |
| 40909243 by ridixcr | 1 | 2016-07-21 03:13:56 UTC | Carnildo | When you come across an issue like this in the Inland Northwest area of the United States, there's usually more than one problem with the data. In this case, for example, way #13922679 was simultaneously tagged as a mine, a stream, and two different roads. |
| 2 | 2016-07-22 20:39:02 UTC | ridixcr | Hey there!The tag landuse=quarry is recommended just for points or areas, and as you can see in the changeset comment I was working on broken polygons so that was the reason for removing just the mentioned tag. However if you know better this area, you can please clean up all the incorrect tags in... | |
| 40697934 by vincent_y79 | 1 | 2016-07-12 20:50:04 UTC | vincent_y79 | Will have to delete this. Airport has been decomissioned in the 70's but still shows up in the charts. |
| 2 | 2016-07-13 04:37:47 UTC | Carnildo | If the runway's still there but no longer in use, tagging it using one of the lifecycle prefixes such as "disused" or "abandoned" (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) may be a better option. | |
| 3 | 2016-07-13 14:07:49 UTC | vincent_y79 | Thank you. Didn't really want to delete because it still shows up in the charts but the abandoned tag was perfect. | |
| 40632240 by Yoshinion | 1 | 2016-07-11 09:09:00 UTC | Carnildo | Aerial imagery here shows something that looks an awful lot like a runway. Is there something I'm missing that says "Regan Ranch Airport" doesn't exist? |
| 40531326 by cpq1 | 1 | 2016-07-07 05:02:40 UTC | Carnildo | Why have you tagged the bank of the Spokane River as being a river in its own right? |
| 34540151 by mattmaxon | 1 | 2016-06-26 06:46:33 UTC | user_5359 | Hello! Are the streets have been built? Can we move the tag Name to the tag name? |
| 2 | 2016-07-02 15:10:39 UTC | mattmaxon | No the roads have never been built. They are labeled as proposed because they are taken from planning documents from lacity planning department. Hopefully they will never be built | |
| 3 | 2016-07-04 02:23:39 UTC | Carnildo | The correct way to mark proposed roads is with the "proposed=residential" tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed). There doesn't appear to be an easy way to do this with the iD editor, though.Marking them as actual roads will lead to navigation software trying to route ... | |
| 40374252 by Carnildo | 1 | 2016-07-02 19:12:28 UTC | EzekielT | Tigrinya is spoken more often than English in Eritrea, so this probably should be reverted. |
| 2 | 2016-07-02 23:42:19 UTC | SomeoneElse | @EzekielT before you made your original change did you consult with anyone from the OSM community in Eritrea (either living there or, given the politics, mapping there and living remotely)? | |
| 3 | 2016-07-04 01:35:36 UTC | Carnildo | I don't care what language is used for the contents of the "name" field, so long as 1) it's just a single language, 2) it's just a single name, and 3) the name reflects one of the things it's called. | |
| 40274216 by Guide Pro | 1 | 2016-06-25 05:17:10 UTC | Carnildo | I noticed you've named a few roads "Unconfirmed Rd". The "name" field shouldn't be used for anything except the name of the object. If you want to add a note that you're not sure a road exists, the best way is to add a "fixme=resurvey" ("Fix Me" from the &qu... |
| 2 | 2016-06-25 17:42:39 UTC | Guide Pro | Thanks for the feedback Carnildo! Revised the roads as suggested and made a note for future. | |
| 39979056 by pete404 | 1 | 2016-06-13 18:21:39 UTC | Carnildo | Are you sure about the east-west runway here? In the latest Mapbox imagery, it looks like it may have been abandoned and re-vegetated. |
| 2 | 2016-06-14 16:23:49 UTC | pete404 | In mapbox it appears to have a strip of green vegetation, so I shrunk the runway and tagged it as disused. | |
| 3 | 2016-06-14 16:23:59 UTC | pete404 | Changeset 40021004 | |
| 39694464 by djkerley | 1 | 2016-06-01 02:45:12 UTC | Carnildo | Please don't make joke edits. |
| 39617650 by kit cosby | 1 | 2016-05-28 06:01:02 UTC | user_5359 | Welcome to OSM! Please double check the name of the fast food. Can it be Burger King ?Please don't use abbreviations. |
| 2 | 2016-05-28 18:05:02 UTC | Carnildo | Unfortunately, Maps.Me is out of date. I did some basic mapping of the shopping mall there two months ago, including that Burger King; Maps.Me hasn't picked up the changes yet.If you've got an address, opening hours, or similar information, feel free to add them and I'll integrate it with the e... | |
| 39616179 by N101BL | 1 | 2016-05-28 01:53:16 UTC | Carnildo | I'm not sure what you were trying to do, but I seriously doubt that the city limits of Speed, KS are a pipeline. I've reverted the change. |
| 39411879 by dagwood70 | 1 | 2016-05-18 22:13:28 UTC | Carnildo | Are the speed limits on Five Mile the result of an on-the-ground check? My experience is that roads out in the county are typically either 25 MPH or 35 MPH (or faster); 30 MPH is rare. |
| 2 | 2016-05-18 22:50:51 UTC | dagwood70 | I've lived in a neighborhood off of this road for 1.5 yr, it has been these speed limits as long as I've been here. This was once rural farm area but much of it is now developed. | |
| 3 | 2016-05-18 23:00:20 UTC | Carnildo | Thanks for confirming it. | |
| 39304423 by Theodore Ro | 1 | 2016-05-14 05:26:25 UTC | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you created this Value Village again? |
| 39296685 by Theodore Ro | 1 | 2016-05-13 18:32:30 UTC | Carnildo | This is the second time you've marked a castle where there clearly isn't one. Is there a reason for this? |
| 2 | 2016-05-15 09:26:39 UTC | Theodore Ro | I put in the wrong street for that Kennewick store the first time (Center Parkway). Is it possible that when I tried to correct the address to Columbia Center Blvd that it put in a second one? | |
| 39074761 by RichRico | 1 | 2016-05-03 20:09:32 UTC | Carnildo | I'm not sure what you were trying to do here, but it left US-95 tangled up, with the northbound and southbound sections crossing over each other and running the wrong way at the intersection with Hidden Haven/1st/North Llumina. I've done my best to fix it. |
| 2 | 2016-08-05 16:18:31 UTC | RichRico | Hi Carnildo.I worked on intersecting highways where they needed. Seems to be a slipping issue while joining nodes. I will review in more detail before making a change. Thanks for your feedback and fixing it. | |
| 38456395 by Heptazane | 1 | 2016-04-10 18:32:50 UTC | Carnildo | Two points about this edit:1) Streams need to point in the direction of flow. You've got the lower section of Hog Creek flowing uphill.2) Where did you get the data for the trail to the outlet of Hog Creek? My notes from my hike yesterday don't show a trail junction there, and there's noth... |
| 2 | 2016-04-24 05:10:06 UTC | Carnildo | I re-surveyed the area today, and could not find any evidence of the upper section of the trail. Given the continued absence of evidence that that part of the trail exists, I'm removing it. | |
| 25998473 by kerseykyle | 1 | 2016-03-28 03:18:07 UTC | Carnildo | Removed "Nes=Cartridge" tagging from seven buildings in this set. |
| 25995335 by kerseykyle | 1 | 2016-03-28 02:21:14 UTC | Carnildo | Removed "Nes=Cartridge" tagging from 54 buildings in this set. |
| 25995505 by kerseykyle | 1 | 2016-03-27 07:32:32 UTC | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you added "Nes=Cartridge" tags to 179 buildings in this changeset? |