| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 153869415 by Ponderosopine @ 2024-07-12 19:24 | 1 | 2024-10-14 03:29 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you re-tagged way 499601425 as a "closed:highway=path"? The upper end certainly looked open this afternoon, with no sign of being brushed out at either the summit or the intersection with Antoine Summit Alternate.Additionally, the Strava Heatmap suggests it'... |
| 2 | 2024-10-15 19:35 | Ponderosopine ♦7 | The reasons for my change were that the path was mapped in the conservation area's public access plan as a trail to be closed and that the path has not been mapped as an existing trail or unmanaged route in official documents since as late as Feb 2020. The path was brushed out at one point, but... | |
| 3 | 2024-10-16 03:13 | Carnildo | Since it's highly visible and heavily used, it should be mapped as a path in accordance with the "on the ground" rule.Since it's not an official trail, tagging it as informal is appropriate; if there's some sort of "do not use" sign at the lower end, setting it... | |
| 4 | 2024-10-16 06:35 | Ponderosopine ♦7 | Yeah, unfortunately for the trail plan, there is no signage there saying not to use it, so I don't blame people for using it.In any case, sounds good. I fixed it and added an informal trail that I have been meaning to map. | |
| 154839704 by Carnildo @ 2024-08-05 09:03 | 1 | 2024-08-05 09:29 | Ponderosopine ♦7 | Hey, thank you! Can you let me know what was wrong? I've been trying to find it every day since I first made the changes that I did to start realigning Colville NF. |
| 2 | 2024-08-05 09:32 | Ponderosopine ♦7 | I should add that I was in the middle of trying to find the problem again just now and noticed in the middle of it that the forest boundaries started rendering again | |
| 3 | 2024-08-05 09:36 | Ponderosopine ♦7 | So upon checking out the changes you made, it looks like I had the wrong relation for one of the small inholdings. Not sure how I missed that over and over! | |
| 4 | 2024-08-05 18:00 | Carnildo | There were three issues that I fixed:1. Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304671097 met https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304719438 one node away from the end. This is the mistake that broke rendering on the OSM website.2. The way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807023986 intersecte... | |
| 153867904 by Ponderosopine @ 2024-07-12 18:38 | 1 | 2024-07-13 04:54 | Carnildo | I'm not sure if that one's still there. Two years ago, I couldn't find the upper end, but I was pretty tired and low on water, and wasn't looking too hard. It was certainly there eight years ago when I first added it to the map. |
| 2 | 2024-07-13 05:09 | Ponderosopine ♦7 | I had it on my mental list to look for it the last time I was there, but I forgot (was also tired and low on water). I'll make sure to look for it next time I'm back out there, probably August or September, but my gut feeling is that it may be overgrown now considering it has never stood o... | |
| 147440569 by Ann4567 @ 2024-02-14 08:48 | 1 | 2024-04-15 09:29 | Carnildo | Where did you get the name for "Peaceful Pines Lane" from? I hiked past the eastern end yesterday, and didn't see either a name or any indication that access (other than perhaps hiking) is permitted. |
| 149408656 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-31 21:21 | 1 | 2024-04-01 21:15 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 149408550 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-31 21:17 | 1 | 2024-04-01 21:15 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 149408523 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-31 21:16 | 1 | 2024-04-01 21:15 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 149408496 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-31 21:15 | 1 | 2024-04-01 21:14 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 149408384 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-31 21:11 | 1 | 2024-04-01 21:12 | Carnildo | These areas may be parts of a park, but they are not themselves parks as OSM understands the concept. Changeset has been reverted. |
| 60458295 by Howpper @ 2018-07-06 08:09 | 1 | 2018-07-06 19:38 | Carnildo | Is it really signed "Sunset Highway" all the way across the state? My experience from driving it was that the "Sunset Highway" signage stopped a bit before Reardan, replaced by generic "SR 2" or "US 2" signs, except where the road picked up a new name while p... |
| 2 | 2024-03-19 17:35 | Glassman ♦5,217 | I'm in the process of updating roads in Lincoln County. The County calls the road State Route 2 except when inside of a city. I'm curious where the name "Sunset Highway" came from? | |
| 3 | 2024-03-25 19:04 | Carnildo | My best guess is the name came from a historical map. Back before the era of numbered state and US routes, long-distance routes were named. "Sunset Highway" was the primary Spokane-to-Seattle route. | |
| 148774691 by StreetSurveyor @ 2024-03-17 14:31 | 1 | 2024-03-18 20:42 | diamondarmorsteve ♦50 | Hello. ZIP codes/postal cities almost never reflect the actual boundaries of the city. They should not replace the actual city limits that were present within OSM previously. |
| 2 | 2024-03-18 21:29 | StreetSurveyor ♦104 | Thanks for letting me know. I reverted the changes. Apologies for my mistake. | |
| 3 | 2024-03-18 23:08 | StreetSurveyor ♦104 | Going forward, how should the parts that are not recognized by the 'city limits' but are reflected with a mailing address in the city be updated? | |
| 4 | 2024-03-19 03:57 | Carnildo | There's no really good way of doing this. The most common is to use the postal city in the "city name" field when adding addresses. | |
| 148803241 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-18 08:09 | 1 | 2024-03-18 19:46 | Carnildo | No, these areas are cemeteries. |
| 2 | 2024-03-18 19:55 | Carnildo | I've reverted your recent changes. Cemeteries, forests, meadows, and nature reserves are not the sort of thing that OSM considers a park. | |
| 148803194 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-18 08:08 | 1 | 2024-03-18 19:54 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 148803156 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-18 08:08 | 1 | 2024-03-18 19:54 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 148802820 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-18 07:58 | 1 | 2024-03-18 19:54 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 148802809 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-18 07:58 | 1 | 2024-03-18 19:54 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 148802779 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-18 07:56 | 1 | 2024-03-18 19:54 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 148802773 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-18 07:56 | 1 | 2024-03-18 19:53 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 148802726 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-18 07:54 | 1 | 2024-03-18 19:53 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 148802514 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-18 07:48 | 1 | 2024-03-18 19:53 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 148801907 by Hermannizer @ 2024-03-18 07:29 | 1 | 2024-03-18 19:53 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 144184419 by Moun10Bike @ 2023-11-18 17:46 | 1 | 2024-02-25 20:26 | Carnildo | Where did you get the name "Turkey Trot" from? According to the sign at the south end of the trail, it's called "Arrow Leaf West" |
| 2 | 2024-02-25 20:45 | Moun10Bike ♦2 | That was the name indicated on TrailForks.com: https://www.trailforks.com/region/antoine-peak-conservation-area-22525/?activitytype=6&z=13.3&lat=47.71699&lon=-117.16911&content=trails,labels,nst,region,poi,directory,polygon,route_popular,waypoint | |
| 136557861 by avinet_ua @ 2023-05-25 19:54 Active block | 1 | 2023-05-25 21:15 | silversurfer83 ♦3,390 | Hi there :)I just checked the community and couldn't find any topic related to your large scale edit going on. So I'd like to ask you here: Did you discuss this thing you're doing?cheerssilversurfer83 |
| 2 | 2023-05-25 21:27 | avinet_ua Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2023-05-25 21:32 | silversurfer83 ♦3,390 | I believe, according to this [1], we do.[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct | |
| 4 | 2023-05-25 21:32 | elveril ♦1 | 34 622 05 12 67 is the real phone , El Veril is a famous restaurant in Graciosa island , at second time , give a second chance us a corner in the center , of service of bicycles , the other phone is a fake , phone this .. the real El Veril | |
| 5 | 2023-05-25 21:36 | avinet_ua Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 6 | 2023-05-25 21:38 | silversurfer83 ♦3,390 | I believe you have to act according to the code of conduct laid out in the wiki before starting something like this, don't you think? | |
| 7 | 2023-05-25 21:44 | avinet_ua Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 8 | 2023-05-25 21:48 | silversurfer83 ♦3,390 | Sure, it's nice.But this project (OSM) is huge and there are rules for this kind of thing (see my link).And the tags aren't broken, they are just old.Please read the wiki page and think about that before you embark on a mission like this.Gotta get to bed now :)cheers | |
| 9 | 2023-05-25 21:52 | avinet_ua Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 10 | 2023-05-25 22:38 | InsertUser ♦444 | Where was this mechanical edit discussed? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136557861 | |
| 11 | 2023-05-26 07:29 | aTarom ♦768 | Fully automated? For example,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174925279/historylavoirs have not been taken into account to properly label? By size or by name... | |
| 12 | 2023-05-26 07:57 | silversurfer83 ♦3,390 | That's why we have the rules, dear avinet_ua.Please refrain from further large scale activities without prior discussion with the affected community. In this case, it would be the world wide community which you can find at the tagging mailing list and / or general talk at community.openstreet... | |
| 13 | 2023-05-26 09:01 | Taya_S ♦978 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3FI'd also like to offer this wiki page in addition to the one Silversurfer already shared. It provides a good reasoning and explanation for why mechanical edits, even ones that seem harmless or obvious can have ... | |
| 14 | 2023-05-26 10:21 | InsertUser ♦444 | Is someone reverting this? | |
| 15 | 2023-05-26 11:03 | tux67 ♦1,938 | There is more like that https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557767 If the user is not willing to revert I suggest to pass that to the DWG | |
| 16 | 2023-05-26 16:51 | MxxCon ♦3,359 | It's sad that the principle is more important than the usable data. :/ | |
| 17 | 2023-05-26 17:01 | SekeRob ♦1,433 | And morehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136560492Makes it running total of 15K+ | |
| 18 | 2023-05-26 17:04 | avinet_ua Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 19 | 2023-05-26 17:25 | silversurfer83 ♦3,390 | As others, who invested some time, in this discussion pointed out: these edits, when not done carefully (with prior discussion) usually make a lot of the data worse than before.So you see, @mxxcon and avinet_ua, the rules are there for a reason.Once again: please discuss these things before em... | |
| 20 | 2023-05-26 17:35 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146 | |
| 21 | 2023-05-26 17:38 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Revert started in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136598791 . It may take some time. | |
| 22 | 2023-05-26 22:46 | DaveF ♦1,562 | @aTaromWhat was wrong with this edit by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174925279/historyWhat do you mean by "By size or by name"?-----------------OSM should be assessing edits based on quality, not quantity. These edits by avinet_ua fix n tag approved for deprecation.I... | |
| 23 | 2023-05-27 08:07 | SekeRob ♦1,433 | hmmm, this mapper did 15K plus mass edits of reservoirs with the title"fixed old landuse=reservoir with replace with natural=water and water=reservoir. If then 1 or more obfuscated in there were not doing that but something else legit then it seems the CS comment was incomplete as well. No one ... | |
| 24 | 2023-05-27 12:12 | MxxCon ♦3,359 | If 1 out of 15000 changes were wrong, I'll take that accuracy any day. Every single day I see dozens of edits around my city with 100% wrong changes. 🙄Ok, we had wrong data in OSM. Somebody fixed it. It got reverted because it didn't follow the process. Let's see how long it�... | |
| 25 | 2023-05-27 12:16 | MxxCon ♦3,359 | And where's guarantee that a changeset that through the "proper" process won't have wrong change in it sneak in? | |
| 26 | 2023-05-27 15:13 | HellMap ♦674 | Where is the 1 out of 15000 number coming from anyway? Someone mentioned a mistake and someone mentioned 15K and we jumped to the 1 in 15K conclusion?So I clicked 20 random ways. 2 were natural ponds. 2 were river areas. 2 were gone/dry ground. 2 were swimming pools. 1 was industrial emergency w... | |
| 27 | 2023-05-27 15:19 | MxxCon ♦3,359 | But such mapcomplete task doesn't exist and didn't exist and who knows when it'll be created and completed. So instead status quo is better?Were the tags worse before or after the change? | |
| 28 | 2023-05-27 15:34 | HellMap ♦674 | One example. Someone added `landuse=reservoir` as a waste water basin in 2012, then `water=wastewater` was introduced around 2013. Now this edit changes it to `water=reservoir`. So, yes, the tag is now worse as it implies the original reservoir designation indeed meant a reservoir and not something ... | |
| 29 | 2023-05-27 15:51 | tux67 ♦1,938 | Fully agee with HellMap ... as a community project we have deleloped guidelines as a result of tons of those discussions. Instead of debating here the time could be spend to set up the Mapcomplete task mentioned or find a solution that widely agreed. .. following the process . | |
| 30 | 2023-05-27 16:21 | ZeLonewolf ♦556 | Look, some communities are fine with these kinds of edits and some aren't. So when you make a huge edit like this, it will inevitably make a bunch of people mad in a place where they hate bulk editing and cause a revert. I would suggest familiarizing yourself a bit more with OSM culture in that... | |
| 31 | 2023-05-27 18:04 | Carnildo | In the United States, the GNIS import (itself a bad idea) brought in many different types of water-storage objects as "landuse=reservoir". Those need to be properly sorted out, not blindly re-tagged. | |
| 32 | 2023-05-27 18:11 | DaveF ♦1,562 | Auto/bot/mechanical edits amend one tag on one type of object. If (& it's a big if) there are amendments to other objects they stand out like sore thumbs. edits are much more likely to be erroneously missed where a contributor changes multiple tags on multiple different objects, even if it&... | |
| 33 | 2023-05-27 18:40 | DaveF ♦1,562 | @HellMap (and @tux67 & Carnildo)So, by your own admission Your argument is straw man. *All* of the errors were in existence prior to these edits. These edits created no errors. The only reason you've become aware of these errors & thnk MapComplete is a solution to fixing them is due t... | |
| 34 | 2023-05-27 20:24 | ZeLonewolf ♦556 | @DaveF, I live in a pragmatic world where I'm concerned about actually getting stuff done. No amount of whinging on a changeset comment will change the fact that some communities and individuals are heavy on rule-lawyering and perfectionism. With this reality in mind, any edit that will get rev... | |
| 35 | 2023-05-28 22:33 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit. See https://www.openstreetmap... | |
| 36 | 2023-05-28 22:46 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Well, that took a while :)It'd be great if some of the excellent points above were discussed a but more widely. Perhaps https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/help-and-support/tagging/71 might be a suitable place?Also, I'm sure that there's some "low hanging fruit" a... | |
| 135435496 by jojodah @ 2023-04-27 16:31 Active block | 1 | 2023-04-27 18:24 | Carnildo | Reverted as vandalism. |
| 2 | 2023-04-29 13:33 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135504010 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7093 | |
| 128664828 by SMS03 @ 2022-11-09 03:39 | 1 | 2023-04-06 21:22 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted the section of service road connecting Alpine to Linder Ridge? |
| 113534284 by Carnildo @ 2021-11-08 18:44 | 1 | 2023-03-22 12:33 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,597 | Hello!What you mapped as shop=internet in this edit ?Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?Office where you can sign up for internet service?Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)\... |
| 2 | 2023-03-22 22:20 | Carnildo | It's a storefront for TDS Telecom: https://tdstelecom.comYes, you can sign up for internet service there, but you can also purchase hardware such as modems. | |
| 131705775 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-25 18:03 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:49 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 130710618 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2022-12-31 07:10 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:49 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:28 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 130710658 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2022-12-31 07:13 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:49 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:28 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131673280 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-24 23:49 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-25 20:39 | Glassman ♦5,217 | I noticed you've changed the name on a number of GNIS nodes. When I look the id up in GNIS they all show the original name. Can you explain why you changed the name? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131673280 |
| 2 | 2023-01-26 06:48 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. | |
| 3 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131673305 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-24 23:51 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:48 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131673351 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-24 23:53 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:48 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131673377 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-24 23:55 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:48 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:28 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131673403 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-24 23:56 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:48 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131673436 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-24 23:58 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:48 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131705817 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-25 18:04 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:48 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131705866 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-25 18:06 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:47 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131705904 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-25 18:08 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:47 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131705965 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-25 18:09 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:47 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131706013 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-25 18:11 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:47 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:28 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131706042 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-25 18:12 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:47 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131706084 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-25 18:14 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:47 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131706120 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-25 18:15 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:47 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131706150 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-25 18:16 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:46 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:29 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 131706180 by CoolGuy2004 @ 2023-01-25 18:17 Active block | 1 | 2023-01-26 06:46 | Carnildo | Changeset has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2023-01-30 13:28 | marczoutendijk_repair ♦11,120 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change. | |
| 128954925 by jrr_yvcog @ 2022-11-15 18:45 | 1 | 2022-11-16 00:00 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!Please don't abbreviate names. It's easy for a computer to construct an abbreviation when it needs to save space, but nearly impossible to expand one. (For example, is "St" short for "Street", "State", or "Saint"?) |
| 2 | 2022-11-16 19:43 | jrr_yvcog ♦1 | I puzzled over what to do with the highway name for a while before saving. I scanned around looking for an example but could not find one in a reasonable amount of time. I'll keep this in mind in the future and thank you for the admonishment. | |
| 3 | 2022-11-17 02:39 | Carnildo | If you've got questions, the "help and support" section of the forum is reasonably active: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/help-and-support/7/noneYou can also look around on the OSM Wiki for answers: whatever information you're looking for is probably there somewhere, t... | |
| 128757402 by Anitalin326 @ 2022-11-11 03:18 | 1 | 2022-11-11 04:43 | Kovoschiz ♦2,536 | This Maps.me changeset needs to have the `name=` removed (is personal itenary), and their existence verified (some may be valid features. |
| 2 | 2022-11-11 18:10 | Glassman ♦5,217 | I recommend reverting this changeset. While the changeset has been marked as resolved, it doesn't appear to be. What I've investigated so far appears to be fake data. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1287... | |
| 3 | 2022-11-11 23:55 | CarraSoft ♦2 | yo vivo en esta zona y el recorrido que hago es real, los cambios son reales, no veo porque cuestionarlo, de que manera tengo que comprobar los datos o quienes son a distancia para decir que es falsa la informacion | |
| 4 | 2022-11-11 23:56 | CarraSoft ♦2 | le inverti tiempo en corroborar y realizar los cambios para que alguien lejos de este lugar opine que son falsas, basado en que?? | |
| 5 | 2022-11-12 03:01 | Glassman ♦5,217 | I looked at additions in my area. For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10174879932 is tagged as a hotel. There is no hotel here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10174885817 is supposed to be an attraction. There is nothing here according to Kartaview imagery. Another example, http... | |
| 6 | 2022-11-12 20:27 | map per ♦1,296 | I just checked Nodes 1-20 but from what I saw a revert is probably the best. @Anitalin326: Unless of course you can come up with good arguments to convince us that your edits are not trash. So Anitalin326, IF YOU READ THIS PLEASE TALK TO US! | |
| 7 | 2022-11-12 22:42 | map per ♦1,296 | @CaraSoft: I'm a little confused about what you said. Are you and Anitalin326 the same person? | |
| 8 | 2022-11-14 23:00 | Carnildo | Reverted. | |
| 128314162 by deven_smith_ @ 2022-10-31 19:33 | 1 | 2022-11-01 01:45 | Carnildo | Are you sure EZ Loader does direct sales? Last time I drove past, the whole place looked decidedly industrial. |
| 2 | 2022-11-01 15:27 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | Maybe it can be tagged industrial, just the land is zoned commercial and they do sales, I'm assuming people can walk into their office to do a sale. Maybe "corporate office" would be more appropriate | |
| 3 | 2022-11-02 00:41 | Carnildo | You can't judge landuse from zoning: it's zoned "GC-150", which permits manufacturing facilities up to 50,000 square feet. (Of Spokane's zone classes, "GC" is the most permissive: it permits almost any residential, commercial, or industrial use.) | |
| 127806809 by eckkam111 @ 2022-10-19 20:52 | 1 | 2022-10-19 22:29 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted a building near the intersection of Fifth and Poplar? It's still visible in all available imagery. |
| 125111005 by skquinn @ 2022-08-19 14:36 | 1 | 2022-09-14 00:44 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Is this an import? If so, where is it documented? |
| 2 | 2022-09-14 02:20 | skquinn ♦803 | See the source tag; this is Microsoft's building outlines via MapWithAI. | |
| 3 | 2022-09-14 02:34 | Allison P ♦1,136 | There is no blanket approval to add Bing buildings unless they are all manually reviewed. Low quality Bing building imports have been reverted in the past. Are you sure you are manually reviewing these? | |
| 4 | 2022-09-14 02:41 | skquinn ♦803 | Anything that doesn't obviously match imagery I delete and don't add. Anything that fails JOSM validation (overlapping buildings) I edit as needed, including deleting and redrawing by hand. Are there specific buildings in this changeset that need manual attention that I missed? | |
| 5 | 2022-09-14 03:04 | Allison P ♦1,136 | It's a little unclear to me what "manually reviewed" means, but I would guess "all buildings are checked". Just looking at this area (not specifically this changeset, just your edits), that wouldn't include https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087505016, https://www.opens... | |
| 6 | 2022-09-14 04:21 | Carnildo | Just looking at the area bounded by Racquet Ridge Road, Racquet Sports Way, and Shady Ace Lane, there are 59 buildings. Of them, 13 are obviously badly mapped when compared to the Bing imagery, for a 22% error rate. I consider a 1% error rate the highest tolerable, and would prefer 0.1% or lower.\... | |
| 7 | 2022-09-14 14:38 | skquinn ♦803 | I fixed a few of these mentioned plus ones I saw taking a closer look. Apparently the building styles in this subdivision are of the type that specifically trip up the AI and I didn't realize it at first. I'll be more diligent reviewing from now on; I usually catch the most egregious AI bu... | |
| 8 | 2022-09-14 15:34 | skquinn ♦803 | I've fixed all the obvious problems I can see in the Racquet Ridge Road/Racquet Sports Way/Shady Ace Lane area. I've also added quite a few buildings that MapWithAI outright missed (arguably an error as well). | |
| 125909508 by slou1030 @ 2022-09-07 16:34 | 1 | 2022-09-07 22:31 | Carnildo | Did you miss updating half of Flamingo Drive? |
| 2 | 2022-09-08 13:01 | slou1030 ♦1 | Apparently so, it's updated now, thanks! | |
| 125480041 by owner of this property @ 2022-08-28 14:21 | 1 | 2022-08-29 08:23 | Carnildo | Being on private property is not a reason to delete people's driveways, or Avista service roads, or other things that exist. They're useful for people like firefighters, delivery drivers, or simply visitors trying to get to someone's home. As such, I've restored them.I have... |
| 2 | 2022-08-29 14:19 | owner of this property ♦1 | There are two things here - a trail on which people routinely trespass and my driveway (leaving from corner of Connaught and Berridae). *Neither are Avista service roads*. They are both privately owned, there is no public access. RE: my driveway, I do not want it on your map, and I don't ca... | |
| 3 | 2022-08-29 14:48 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Tough luck. There are no laws against mapping others' property where OSM is based. There is a law against computer vandalism, though. And there are plenty of users who are happy to restore the data as often as is needed.The other thing is that we're not responsible for misuse of maps u... | |
| 4 | 2022-08-29 18:25 | Carnildo | There were six things you deleted:* A driveway leading to a water tower that was mostly on city-owned land.* Two driveways leading to houses, crossing land owned by three different people.* A service road running under Bonneville Power Administration lines. You're correct that it&#... | |
| 125056801 by phd0 @ 2022-08-18 11:11 | 1 | 2022-08-19 01:28 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted the elevator providing access between the upper and lower levels of Concourse B? |
| 2 | 2022-08-19 10:38 | phd0 ♦54 | hello, it will be maybe a error of me, but it will return ERROR in iD because it will be not connected to somethingsPhilippe | |
| 3 | 2022-08-19 20:41 | Carnildo | The correct way to deal with that error is to map the hallways leading to and from the elevator, or if you don't want to do that, ignore the warning iD is giving you.Deleting something that exists just because iD doesn't like it is the wrong thing to do. | |
| 123923765 by Coloradohusky @ 2022-07-22 07:18 | 1 | 2022-07-22 21:18 | Carnildo | Having the pond (a multipolygon inner element) sharing an edge with the golf course (a multipolygon outer element) is going to confuse some renderers. Either enlarge the golf course to fully contain the pond, shrink it to fully exclude it, or remove the pond from the golf-course multipolygon. |
| 2 | 2022-07-22 23:15 | Coloradohusky ♦4 | The pond is owned by the golf course, and uses the pond as the boundary between the house property lines and the golf property lines - which one would be most appropriate? Thanks for your help by the way | |
| 3 | 2022-07-23 01:22 | Carnildo | I'd go with the "remove it from the multipolygon" option. It sounds like the pond is part of the golf course, and this option would reflect that. | |
| 4 | 2022-07-23 02:22 | Coloradohusky ♦4 | Awesome, thank you - fixed with changeset #123959863 | |
| 123928457 by WEvans @ 2022-07-22 09:10 | 1 | 2022-07-22 21:24 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you removed the stopways at the ends of runway 2/20? As far as I can tell, those still exist. |
| 2 | 2022-10-05 04:31 | WEvans ♦1 | Sure if I made a mistake then put them back. Regards | |
| 123770346 by Peter Maris @ 2022-07-18 15:57 | 1 | 2022-07-18 21:01 | Carnildo | Are you sure Vancouver's "Columbia River" neighborhood is named "Río Columbia" in Spanish? |
| 2 | 2022-07-18 21:07 | Carnildo | Further investigation shows that "\tGran Río" is *not* an alternative Spanish-language name for any of these things, it's the Spanish-language translation of the Upper Chinook name for the river. Similarly, "Río Serpiente" is not the Spanish-language name for ... | |
| 3 | 2022-07-18 21:49 | Peter Maris ♦3 | I corrected the name for the neighborhood, thank you for the notice.The alternative names are colloquial and/or rarely used names, but in my opinion these can remain for the search function. Other map providers have even saved tons of alternative names for each location. Alternate names are neve... | |
| 4 | 2022-07-18 23:16 | Carnildo | I'm pretty sure that "Gran Río" and "Río Serpiente" aren't rarely-used names, they're never-used names, with OSM being the only place that has them. | |
| 5 | 2023-06-08 03:41 | Himké ♦69 | Please refrain from naming linear features en masse. Multilingual names need only be added to parent relations. | |
| 123350903 by aepler315 @ 2022-07-08 08:48 | 1 | 2022-07-08 21:23 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you disconnected the two parts of Boulder Mountain Spur? They look connected in the aerial imagery. |
| 123298743 by dagwood70 @ 2022-07-07 04:02 | 1 | 2022-07-07 20:33 | Carnildo | This is the third copy of the Music Plus Learning Center you've added to the map. Is there a reason for this redundancy? |
| 2 | 2022-07-07 20:45 | dagwood70 ♦2 | My mistake. I made addition thru/on 2 different iPhone apps not realizing it. I must have mistakenly done it twice on 1 of them. Appologies. | |
| 123069193 by Coloradohusky @ 2022-07-01 05:46 | 1 | 2022-07-01 23:13 | Carnildo | "access=designated" doesn't make sense. "designated" is meant to be applied to specific modes of travel, such as "hgv=designated" to indicate a truck route. |
| 2 | 2022-07-02 00:46 | Coloradohusky ♦4 | On Go Map!!, it gives me multiple options to choose from for ‘All Travel’: Allowed, Prohibited, Permissive, Private, Designated, Destination, Dismount, and Permit - I selected Designated, as signs said it was for maintenance use only (see https://ibb.co/KF8mdwS and https://ibb.co/smQFgW4... | |
| 3 | 2022-07-02 01:37 | Carnildo | Sounds like the access should be "private", then: you can only use it with explicit permission. | |
| 122927018 by Coloradohusky @ 2022-06-27 20:14 | 1 | 2022-06-28 00:46 | Carnildo | The school name was already mapped on the school grounds. Unless the building has a different name than the school as a whole, there's no need to repeat it. |
| 122736802 by Coloradohusky @ 2022-06-23 04:50 | 1 | 2022-06-23 17:04 | Glassman ♦5,217 | What is US:R4-7? I don't see any roads like that in the area? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122736802 |
| 2 | 2022-06-24 01:07 | Coloradohusky ♦4 | I thought that was how to tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MUTCD (road sign, keep right), traffic_sign=US:R4-7 | |
| 3 | 2022-06-24 01:41 | Carnildo | Traffic signs other than the common ones ("stop", "speed limit") are a fairly obscure topic. I'm pretty sure what you've got is the correct way to tag a "keep right" sign. | |
| 4 | 2022-06-24 02:28 | Glassman ♦5,217 | Thanks @Carnildo - I've never mapped a traffic sign as a node. I need to complement my friend, Bryce, the GoMap!! developer, for his UI. @Coloradohusky - sorry for the dumb question. | |
| 121257703 by Neil Stratton @ 2022-05-20 18:57 | 1 | 2022-06-15 18:53 | Carnildo | Thanks for the additions!When you added speed limits to these roads, you didn't indicate a unit, which causes the software to assume it's kilometers per hour. Am I correct in thinking that these should be marked as "miles per hour" rather than being some of the very few km/h... |
| 122202388 by JosédosSantos @ 2022-06-10 09:51 | 1 | 2022-06-10 13:46 | Trevor_1 ♦270 | Hi, can you please try to make your changesets smaller? This one covers a large area across multiple continents |
| 2 | 2022-06-10 13:51 | Trevor_1 ♦270 | Hola, podrías hacer tus changesets mas pequeños? Esto cubre una área muy grande, en varios continentes. (No hablo portugués, pero sí hablo español). | |
| 3 | 2022-06-10 23:08 | Carnildo | Why did you delete a restaurant that, by all evidence, still exists? | |
| 4 | 2022-06-11 12:58 | Hudhaifah ♦1 | A actually don't know how it came by that | |
| 122051851 by chrispix @ 2022-06-07 05:44 | 1 | 2022-06-07 21:16 | Carnildo | Are you sure the name is correct? The Spokane County streets department doesn't have a record of a street by that name there, while the assessor's office says the property has a "Park Lane" address. |
| 2 | 2022-06-07 22:15 | chrispix ♦1 | Name is correct, issue is that most of these streets are private (south of Ely / 18th) and while the property does have a park lane address, there is also a shop on property w/ it's own electric that is listed as Tegridy. | |
| 3 | 2022-06-08 02:51 | Carnildo | Thanks for the confirmation. | |
| 4 | 2022-06-08 21:03 | Glassman ♦5,217 | #TIP: OSM doesn't use abbreviations in street names. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122051851 | |
| 121665144 by OrcaDan @ 2022-05-29 15:29 | 1 | 2022-05-30 15:45 | user_5359 ♦19,360 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14195015. What is the meaning of the tag ceb = Teal Lake (lanaw sa Tinipong Bansa, Washington, Okanogan County)? |
| 2 | 2022-05-31 00:03 | OrcaDan ♦13 | That is the wikipedia link to the lake in the Cebuano language page. Someone ran a bot creating a number of wikipedia articles in the Cebuano language. Teal Lake happened to be one of many features with wikipedia articles about them in Cebuano. As there is no English wikipedia article about Teal Lak... | |
| 3 | 2022-06-01 03:10 | Carnildo | Links to the Cebuano Wikipedia are almost never worth adding. As you noted, the articles are bot-generated. In the case of Teal Lake, the article is a mashup of geographic information (things like the approximate elevation of the lake, the county it's in, and the lake's distance from Was... | |
| 4 | 2022-06-04 21:15 | OrcaDan ♦13 | I see your point. I will leave out these links in the future. | |
| 121480349 by Gandalf Wizardstaff @ 2022-05-25 15:01 | 1 | 2022-05-25 20:50 | Carnildo | The "unmaintained" part of "unmaintained track road" isn't a strict requirement, but I agree it's a service road, not a logging or farm track. |
| 2 | 2022-05-25 21:16 | Gandalf Wizardstaff ♦2 | So, I am new to OSM. Did you create that feature originally and then receive a notification when I eddited it? I was confident in making that particular edit however am wondering how to best contact the original contributor if I find something I simply have a question about. Thanks | |
| 3 | 2022-05-26 02:22 | Carnildo | I keep an eye on the eastern Washington/northern Idaho area, and noticed your edit. The track/service distinction is one that a lot of people have trouble with, so I thought I'd leave a comment."Original creator" frequently isn't useful information, particularly for roads: m... | |
| 4 | 2022-05-26 12:45 | Gandalf Wizardstaff ♦2 | Ok! Well thanks for the first comment and the informative follow up. | |
| 120989902 by MikeC03 @ 2022-05-14 18:58 | 1 | 2022-05-17 21:51 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted the island the 14th hole of the Coeur d'Alene Resort golf course is on? |
| 120815908 by KevinCole509 @ 2022-05-11 02:10 | 1 | 2022-05-12 00:04 | Carnildo | Changing the address doesn't actually move anything: the map still had your business located at the corner of Canal and Auburn, just with a different address.I've moved it properly, by removing the business information from the old building and adding a business "point" objec... |
| 120807488 by Diego Y @ 2022-05-10 19:01 | 1 | 2022-05-11 03:28 | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset. It's too large for any of the QA tools to handle properly, but changing Burlington High School from a school to a nuclear explosion site suggests that it was not made in good faith. |
| 2 | 2022-05-11 11:29 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5987Marc ZoutendijkOpenStreetMap FoundationData Working Group | |
| 120210629 by jesusvaldez12 @ 2022-04-26 12:22 | 1 | 2022-04-26 21:27 | Carnildo | I've reverted all of your changes except the very first one. If you continue to add nonsense to the map, you're likely to be blocked. |
| 120207769 by jesusvaldez12 @ 2022-04-26 11:29 | 1 | 2022-04-26 21:00 | impiaaa ♦420 | Please write more descriptive changeset comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Also, try to save your changes in one local area before moving somewhere else. |
| 2 | 2022-04-26 21:14 | Carnildo | Please don't add random objects to the map. Instead, map what what actually exists. I've reverted this changeset. | |
| 119757789 by Hiausirg_Import @ 2022-04-15 16:30 | 1 | 2022-04-15 19:00 | Carnildo | Did you do any conflation before running this import? The very first thing I checked, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9668520092, had already been mapped two months earlier. The second, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9668520090, had been mapped five years earlier.I also find it unusual ... |
| 2 | 2022-04-15 19:50 | zluuzki ♦224 | Yes, i did. However, i didn't know about shop=butcher, so i didn't search for it. But did it now and removed 95 duplicated features.On the second example; I wouldn't be able to find it anyway, since it's not tagged with man_made=works, industrial=slaughterhause, or anything at ... | |
| 3 | 2022-04-15 19:57 | impiaaa ♦420 | Please follow the import guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GuidelinesIn particular:- Document the import- Link the documentation in the changeset comment- Notify the imports mailing list- Wait for a week for feedback from the local community- Do not damage the live d... | |
| 4 | 2022-04-15 20:29 | impiaaa ♦420 | In addition to the duplicate data (which is against the "Don't put data on top of data" import guideline), the "phone" and "description" tags are not properly formatted. Because of these issues, it's clear that the data did not go through manual review before ... | |
| 5 | 2022-04-15 20:34 | impiaaa ♦420 | Reverted in changeset 119765007 | |
| 119562802 by deven_smith_ @ 2022-04-11 07:00 | 1 | 2022-04-11 20:57 | Carnildo | When you expand a node into a building like you did with Chaps Coffee Co., please make sure you copy all the information across, not just the name. |
| 2 | 2022-04-12 07:05 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | Didn't notice the other info, thanks for reminding me | |
| 119035798 by jellyturtle @ 2022-03-28 19:02 | 1 | 2022-03-28 22:00 | Carnildo | At least two of the paths you added exist only in Strava, not on the ground, and the two footways you changed from "abandoned" to "active" are very much abandoned, and in places are no longer visible. |
| 2 | 2022-03-29 04:32 | Carnildo | After further checking, every one of the trails you've added within the conservation area boundary is in my notes as either "needs on-the-ground investigation" or "investigated, found absent". Is this the result of an actual survey, or just Strava? | |
| 3 | 2022-03-29 16:14 | jellyturtle ♦3 | Thanks for the info @Carnildo. I added the trails based on checking the Strava heatmap against the Esri imagery, but only surveyed the trail running up Turtle Gulch, which is well established as of this spring. To be conservative, I just removed the less-travelled trails with changeset 119077417 unt... | |
| 118611051 by Omnific @ 2022-03-17 21:08 | 1 | 2022-03-17 21:28 | Carnildo | Could you slow down and be more careful with your additions? They've generally been quite accurate, but you've made a few major mistakes, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1041264271 (a garden mapped as a building) or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1041262862 (a building drawn ... |
| 2 | 2022-03-17 23:05 | Omnific ♦202 | Nobody's perfect. I catch 99% of issues during my street-by-street visual scan, but there will likely be 1% that slip through, unfortunately. | |
| 3 | 2022-03-17 23:07 | Omnific ♦202 | Appreciate you double checking my work, however. | |
| 105269747 by Greg_Rose @ 2021-05-25 07:18 | 1 | 2022-02-25 02:15 | Carnildo | Are you sure the State Line Motor Trail is a "highway=track"? The Thompson Pass end was very path-like when I surveyed it four years ago -- I'm sure I couldn't use anything with more than two wheels on it. |
| 2 | 2022-02-25 06:00 | Greg_Rose ♦175 | I had a tough time with the State Line Trail - it's supposed to be open to ATV's and I'd been told that ATV ways should be tracks and not paths. But I could see in aerial imagery that it looked very much like singletrack in places, even as it also looked like a 4x4 road in others.If... | |
| 3 | 2022-02-25 07:26 | Carnildo | I've only verified the southernmost 500 feet or so -- I was coming back from a hike to Upper Blossom Lake, and noticed an information sign on the other side of the road (which I appear to have forgotten to map). | |
| 116527299 by NFZANMNIM @ 2022-01-24 07:13 | 1 | 2022-01-24 23:04 | Carnildo | There's no need to put three names into the "name" field -- one is sufficient. That's the whole reason there are "name:lang" tags. |
| 2 | 2022-01-24 23:25 | NFZANMNIM ♦73 | it's a common practice on OSM to use multiple languages on the "name" tag for jurisdictions that have more than 1 official/principal language. Same thing is done in parts of Europe (such as the city of Brussels) and Africa that are bilingual/multilingual , or also in Canada specifical... | |
| 3 | 2022-01-25 02:26 | Carnildo | In case you haven't noticed, the United States isn't part of Europe, Africa, or Canada. | |
| 4 | 2022-01-25 03:15 | NFZANMNIM ♦73 | ummm i think you misunderstood my point. My point was about how the tag "name" is used on OSM elsewhere.and yes you're correct about the US in general. Nevertheless, Native American Tribal governments in the US are considered to be sovereign entities, with their own official and p... | |
| 116129327 by tammytoodles2 @ 2022-01-14 00:23 | 1 | 2022-01-14 06:00 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for adding some missing businesses.Please be careful when editing. You did two of what we call "node drags", where you accidentally pull part of an object across the map. I've fixed them, but it's something to watch out for in the future. |
| 115824410 by woodpeck_repair @ 2022-01-06 07:34 | 1 | 2022-01-06 08:29 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 115294487, 115294930, 115296549, 115297322, 115300029, 115300801, 115300827, 115300850, 115301073, 115301232. |
| 2 | 2022-01-06 08:36 | GuenniLD ♦2 | Wouldn‘t it be even better to divide the tag with multiple values („piste:grooming=classic+skating“) into two seperate tags? For example: „piste:grooming:classic=yes“ and „piste:grooming:skating=yes“)Suggested here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mu... | |
| 3 | 2022-01-06 22:31 | Carnildo | As far as I know, all the major consumers of the "piste:grooming" tag understand the "classic+skating" notation. As far as I know, none of them understand separate tags. This strikes me as a case of "if it ain't broken, don't fix it". | |
| 115798000 by stevethomp @ 2022-01-05 13:29 | 1 | 2022-01-06 02:50 | Carnildo | That's a *former* golf course. It shut down years ago, and there are currently plans to convert the land into a residential development. |
| 115543243 by AZZagBoi @ 2021-12-30 01:07 | 1 | 2021-12-30 05:37 | Carnildo | Is there a short name for the building that's in common use? "John and Joan Bollier Family Center for Integrated Science and Engineering" is rather unwieldy. |
| 2 | 2021-12-30 06:18 | AZZagBoi ♦1 | All the other buildings on campus have the exact names on the map. Gonzaga purposefully chose to name the new building as is. Although, perhaps "Bollier Center for Integrated Science and Engineering" could be used. | |
| 3 | 2021-12-30 19:31 | Carnildo | I've added the full-length name to the "official name" field. That way, the building can still be found when searching by the full name, and anyone making a custom map has the option of showing it. | |
| 115360170 by Hiausirg_Import @ 2021-12-25 13:20 | 1 | 2021-12-26 05:35 | Carnildo | The data source you're using is outdated: you added Spokane County Station 48 in its old location, but the station moved a mile and a half to the southwest five years ago.(The old location is mapped as a "disused:amenity=fire_station".) |
| 2 | 2021-12-26 06:57 | zluuzki ♦224 | Deleted it. This can happen, nothing is perfect. | |
| 3 | 2022-01-14 21:58 | ZeLonewolf ♦556 | DWG revert requested; ticket #Ticket#2022011410000126 due to quality & conflation issues with undiscussed fire station import. | |
| 114936027 by deven_smith_ @ 2021-12-14 19:00 | 1 | 2021-12-14 19:26 | Carnildo | I'm not familiar with the business, but from the signs visible in Bing Streetside, it looks like "Red Line Coins" is more like a "collectibles shop" than a "currency exchange". |
| 2 | 2021-12-15 03:17 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | https://www.redlinecoins.comI thought it would be a currency exchange as they trade money for gold and silver, both forms of currency | |
| 3 | 2021-12-15 20:56 | Carnildo | "Currency exchange" is meant for more mainstream currencies, such as Euros or Yen -- things you could spend at a typical store. | |
| 114147113 by rayleigh1 @ 2021-11-23 16:18 | 1 | 2021-11-23 23:38 | Carnildo | Could you please be more careful in your checking? You had two buildings overlapping driveways, and about three dozen cases of a building outline covering more than one building. |
| 2 | 2021-11-26 10:17 | rayleigh1 ♦100 | Could you point me to the cases of buildings covering more than 1 building? I can imagine missing a driveway, but I didn't notice any doubled buildings, thanks in advance. | |
| 3 | 2021-11-26 10:17 | rayleigh1 ♦100 | And it's weird that the validator didn't complain about overlapping buildings and highways, do you know why that may be the case? | |
| 4 | 2021-11-26 19:05 | Carnildo | I already fixed the multiple-coverage outlines ones I saw. The clearest example would probably be https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1005616535#map=19/46.41575/-117.04922 where the outline originally covered the two buildings to the north. If you use Esri Clarity imagery or view things from the sid... | |
| 5 | 2021-11-28 11:21 | rayleigh1 ♦100 | Thank you, I'll make sure to check for such errors more thoroughly next time. | |
| 114162226 by Karen Keeley @ 2021-11-24 02:08 | 1 | 2021-11-24 03:58 | Carnildo | You turned Okanogan County into a river. I've fixed it, but please be more careful in the future. |
| 2 | 2021-11-24 21:29 | Glassman ♦5,217 | According to your lat/long the peak is just a few feet south of the actual peak. Another OSM editor, JOSM has the lat/long displayed on screen. JOSM is available at josm.openstreetmap.de. Let me know if you need. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/... | |
| 114076480 by jellyturtle @ 2021-11-21 23:25 | 1 | 2021-11-22 22:04 | Carnildo | I think this needs to be reverted. At least one of the Mica Peak trails you added doesn't exist, and I've got my doubts about a second one. |
| 2 | 2021-11-22 22:40 | jellyturtle ♦3 | Thanks, can you be more specific about the trails on Mica Peak in question? The long one from the top of Quinnamose Cr west to Seltese Cr is very well travelled according to the Strava heatmap and visible from several satellite views, probably a trail on an old logging road. The small one at the wes... | |
| 3 | 2021-11-23 03:04 | Carnildo | The upper trail network was completely re-worked in the past year, so some of the Strava heatmap tracks are stale (I think Strava uses a three-year history).When I was surveying the area a month ago, I ran out of daylight before being able to check more than the junction between the Quinnamose-S... | |
| 4 | 2021-12-04 21:03 | jellyturtle ♦3 | Thanks for all the feedback, and my apologies for missing that you had added tags to those stubs! I'll look for those in the future. Using the changeset viewer I added back in all the access tags from ways I had deleted. I deleted that turnaround I added since it seems not to be used. For the t... | |
| 113883892 by deven_smith_ @ 2021-11-17 07:39 | 1 | 2021-11-22 22:01 | Carnildo | Where did you get the routing of the "Etter Ranch Access Trail" from? I went hiking there last Saturday, and while the lower section is pretty much spot-on (except for the name), the upper section bears no resemblance to reality. |
| 2 | 2021-11-29 18:07 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | As I mentioned in the change note description, it was an approximation of the trail from the sheet Spokane County provided. That's where I got the name also | |
| 114076684 by jellyturtle @ 2021-11-21 23:37 | 1 | 2021-11-22 21:56 | Carnildo | Are you sure about those trails you added? Only one of them corresponds to a junction I noted in an on-the-ground survey. |
| 2 | 2021-11-22 22:50 | jellyturtle ♦3 | These were all just inferred from the Strava heatmap so I deleted four of them that were less well travelled/distinct in favor of confirming them on the ground. The others look very well travelled. | |
| 114006957 by The Rev @ 2021-11-19 20:16 | 1 | 2021-11-19 22:09 | Glassman ♦5,217 | Why did you pick Tahoma instead of one of the other native american names such as "Takhoma" or "Ta-co-bet" just to mention two. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114006957 |
| 2 | 2021-11-19 22:28 | The Rev ♦1 | I used the most common for the Puyallup tribe, whose territory the volcano falls within. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puyallup_people#/media/File:Puyallup.pngIn reality, these are merely close approximations without using the international phonetic alphabet. Regardless, I think capturing the in... | |
| 3 | 2021-11-20 01:22 | bryceco ♦28 | While I understand that there are good reasons to (officially) restore the name of the mountain, similar to how Denali was renamed, until a widely-recognized official change occurs we should use the most widely used name: Rainier | |
| 4 | 2021-11-20 04:38 | The Rev ♦1 | Respectfully, I disagree. Common names can include derogatory replacements of indigenous names. Even replacements that may seem common sense and respectful can meet extreme pushback.Just because it's common, does not make it correct. Perhaps a tag of "name:common" might be appr... | |
| 5 | 2021-11-20 04:42 | The Rev ♦1 | Local context: https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/changing-name-mount-rainier-new-effort-washington-tribes/RZ7STJVYDNFMLGPNCHZY62CRWI/ | |
| 6 | 2021-11-20 05:11 | Carnildo | General practice in OpenStreetMap is to put the most-common name in the "name" field: we map the world as it is, not as we wish it was.Assuming the Puyallup tribe still uses "Tahoma" as the name of the mountain, it should go in either the "name:lut" field (if you�... | |
| 7 | 2021-11-20 05:14 | bryceco ♦28 | I sympathize with your position. In OSM there are lots of situations (e.g. Russia/Crimea) where the morally correct map disagrees with the situation real people encounter while navigating the world. As a project we’ve chosen to resolve these conflicts by mapping what’s seen “on the... | |
| 8 | 2021-11-21 01:29 | Glassman ♦5,217 | Can you please set the mountains back to their official name? Adding in the indigenous name with the appropriate language tag would be helpful. | |
| 9 | 2021-12-06 21:52 | Glassman ♦5,217 | I haven't heard back from you so I changed the name back to Mount Rainier. I did leave in the salish version that you added. | |
| 113668113 by deven_smith_ @ 2021-11-11 20:36 | 1 | 2021-11-12 02:07 | Carnildo | Most of the relations seem to have come through okay, though there was some weirdness in the Bus 63 route master relation that I fixed.The problem with this changeset is that when you split US-2 at the intersection, you didn't bring *any* of the road attributes over to the new one-way segme... |
| 113557967 by alikp_telenav @ 2021-11-09 09:57 | 1 | 2021-11-09 17:42 | Carnildo | Have they finished re-building the bridge? Last I heard, construction wasn't scheduled to be finished until sometime next year. |
| 2 | 2021-11-09 18:59 | alikp_telenav ♦2 | Hello Carnildo,Thank you for contacting me about this. Unfortunatelly, I do not have local knowledge about the bridge, my only sources were the satelite images in which everything seem fine. I reverted the changeset.Have a great day! | |
| 112672466 by Mark Clayton @ 2021-10-18 22:27 | 1 | 2021-11-03 17:52 | Carnildo | You appear to have merged five different features in Noxon to produce a single post office/church/museum/town/fire station. What happened? |
| 113312362 by PatrickKH2002 @ 2021-11-03 05:13 | 1 | 2021-11-03 07:53 | Carnildo | OpenStreetMap is about mapping what's there, not what we wish was there. |
| 2 | 2021-11-04 10:34 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5423 Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 113156505 by Theo Asselman @ 2021-10-30 11:01 | 1 | 2021-10-30 18:24 | Carnildo | Not every use of the name "Forest" is wrong. You removed the name from two roads, a building, and a city district.I've reverted this changeset. |
| 2 | 2021-10-30 19:54 | Theo Asselman ♦7 | Thanks for correcting me. I assumed the roadnames were wrong and expected "Forest Road" (as an example.)It was another building on the site I found on the internet, refering to "Forest Offices".English is not my daily language but if 'blind removal' means what I t... | |
| 113019690 by PatrickKH2002 @ 2021-10-27 05:55 | 1 | 2021-10-27 17:50 | Carnildo | It would be useful to know what roads have been changed and why, particularly when you're bumping a road's importance by two grades, or adding a major road that doesn't show up in any aerial imagery. |
| 2 | 2021-10-27 18:40 | Glassman ♦5,217 | I reverted this changeset. There too many problems. Roads that don't exist, upgrading minor roads, schools that don't exist, roundabout that don't exist. removing portion of SR 20, and more. I'll send you a message with some suggestions on how to contribute to OpenStreetMap. | |
| 3 | 2021-10-30 09:35 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5416Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 112953062 by deven_smith_ @ 2021-10-25 15:25 | 1 | 2021-10-25 17:37 | Carnildo | Could you please be more careful? When you updated the alignment, you deleted the lane count, speed limit, and other useful information from the existing section of road. |
| 2 | 2021-10-26 00:27 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | Ah shoot, yeah sorry, forgot about adding that information back, will add it back | |
| 112596144 by snarkyclarky @ 2021-10-17 00:36 | 1 | 2021-10-22 04:42 | Carnildo | Four errors:1) A patio roof mapped as a separate building.2) Two buildings mapped as one.3) A building outline showing a courtyard that doesn't exist.4) A temporary tent mapped as a permanent building.*Sigh* |
| 112593199 by Андрей Дихтяр @ 2021-10-16 21:00 | 1 | 2021-10-16 21:41 | Alexey Vazhnov ♦163 | Could you please describe, what was made in this edit? |
| 2 | 2021-10-16 23:53 | janolezab ♦102 | And please keep future changeset's bounding boxes to a minimum. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112593199 | |
| 3 | 2021-10-17 14:54 | Lee Carré ♦665 | ▪︎http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets▪︎what makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments | |
| 4 | 2021-10-20 19:00 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you added pedestrian crossings in the middle of nowhere in Canada and the United States? | |
| 112006387 by Baloo Uriza @ 2021-10-02 15:52 | 1 | 2021-10-02 17:41 | Carnildo | You've tagged a power line as a primary road here. I've undone it, but please be more careful in the future. |
| 2 | 2021-10-02 21:23 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,108 | Thanks, mybad. | |
| 111620799 by The Real Mikerson @ 2021-09-23 21:55 | 1 | 2021-09-23 22:42 | Carnildo | Two of the three things you deleted were marked as "private driveway", not "road". The correct thing to do would have been to mark the third one as a private driveway as well. |
| 2 | 2021-09-24 17:39 | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset. | |
| 111655675 by The Real Mikerson @ 2021-09-24 16:18 | 1 | 2021-09-24 17:38 | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset. Just like last time, the things you deleted were correctly labeled as private driveways. |
| 111565056 by windermereseo @ 2021-09-22 22:49 | 1 | 2021-09-22 23:05 | Carnildo | The "description" field is intended for information that doesn't fit in the structured tags, such as what sort of real estate services are offered. It's not a place to write a promotional blurb for your business. |
| 111519037 by snarkyclarky @ 2021-09-22 01:44 | 1 | 2021-09-22 01:56 | Carnildo | Three errors:1) Removal of "building=apartments" tags from two buildings.2) Mapping four buildings as one.3) A building outline is about 25% larger than the building. |
| 111518966 by snarkyclarky @ 2021-09-22 01:35 | 1 | 2021-09-22 01:51 | Carnildo | Three errors:1) A building missing a quarter of its outline.2) Two buildings mapped as one.3) Three buildings mapped as one. |
| 111518984 by snarkyclarky @ 2021-09-22 01:37 | 1 | 2021-09-22 01:47 | Carnildo | Two errors:1) A building missing a corner2) Two buildings mapped as one. |
| 111518010 by snarkyclarky @ 2021-09-22 00:03 | 1 | 2021-09-22 00:29 | Carnildo | You're clearly not spending enough, if any, time reviewing things. One of the "buildings" in this changeset is a travel trailer, and another only vaguely resembles the actual structure on the ground.Please stop. |
| 2 | 2021-09-22 00:35 | snarkyclarky ♦6 | As a fellow contributor you're welcome to make any changes you feel are necessary. Thanks! | |
| 3 | 2021-09-22 00:46 | Carnildo | The change I feel necessary is to revert everything you've done since changeset #111471825 as an undiscussed import. Do you agree? | |
| 4 | 2021-09-22 00:48 | snarkyclarky ♦6 | Unfortunately to OSM standards that would be considered vandalism since you're removing sourced information and aren't replacing it. Probably not the best idea. | |
| 5 | 2021-09-22 00:58 | Carnildo | Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and the rest of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Import_Policy -- the standard for imports is "guilty until proven innocent".I'd prefer not to revert it myself -- the Data Working Group has better tools ... | |
| 6 | 2021-09-22 01:10 | snarkyclarky ♦6 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RapiDConsidering that RapiD appears to be a formally accepted import tool by the OSM community it would appear that it falls under these guidelines. The main ask of this tool is to review the information being added, which I believe I do. But such as any editing... | |
| 7 | 2021-09-22 01:26 | Carnildo | When used carefully, inspecting each candidate building against appropriate imagery to ensure that it (1) exists and (2) is traced properly, RapID is an accepted tool.When using it as you are, importing buildings at rates in excess of one per second, it falls solidly under the import guidelines.... | |
| 8 | 2021-09-22 01:33 | snarkyclarky ♦6 | Unfortunately that would be a matter of opinion then. When using the tool, I can see if the building outline looks correct and then add it accordingly, which doesn't take months to figure out in my opinion. If a building isn't outlined properly I either attempt to realign it myself or don&... | |
| 111518275 by snarkyclarky @ 2021-09-22 00:23 | 1 | 2021-09-22 00:34 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you think that Maplewood Gardens, The Academy, Altura, and The Highline shouldn't be apartment buildings, or is it just that RapID is allergic to classifying building types? |
| 2 | 2021-09-22 00:38 | snarkyclarky ♦6 | For whatever reason any buildings classified as "Apartment Building" don't appear in renders that use OSM. Replacing them with a point or an area zone to retain the information of the building would be preferred. | |
| 3 | 2021-09-22 00:44 | Carnildo | Which renderer are you using that is so incredibly broken that it ignores some building types?The correct thing to do is to fix the renderer, not break the map. | |
| 4 | 2021-09-22 00:52 | snarkyclarky ♦6 | Render users like Snapchat, Pokemon Go, and travel apps show missing information for that label. Must be something on Mapbox's end that needs to be fixed. | |
| 111516961 by snarkyclarky @ 2021-09-21 22:52 | 1 | 2021-09-21 23:01 | Carnildo | Please stop adding low-quality scribbles to the map. |
| 111516159 by snarkyclarky @ 2021-09-21 22:06 | 1 | 2021-09-21 22:08 | Carnildo | Please don't. We're supposed to be getting a much better set of building outlines to import from in the near future. |
| 110887834 by windermereseo @ 2021-09-08 04:23 | 1 | 2021-09-08 21:40 | Carnildo | What sort of a business is a "Chris O'Doherty - Windermere"? It's useful to tag that so people can find it when searching by type, not just when searching by name. |
| 110258620 by Howpper @ 2021-08-26 03:35 | 1 | 2021-08-26 05:18 | Carnildo | It would be nice if you explained *why* you're changing the road classification. The last person to do so did. |
| 109971441 by Yamílo @ 2021-08-20 07:57 | 1 | 2021-08-20 07:59 | Yamílo ♦7 | The changeset window is only so large, because of the USA relation. |
| 2 | 2021-08-21 01:46 | Carnildo | You've changed the official name of the United States to "ur=ریاست ہائے متحدہ". Do you plan to fix this? | |
| 3 | 2021-08-21 11:57 | flother ♦65 | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110025611 | |
| 108863021 by Mark Trail @ 2021-07-30 06:16 | 1 | 2021-07-31 00:45 | Carnildo | What sort of a thing is "Pandora"? I'm pretty sure that "park" isn't the correct tag for it. |
| 108518791 by Joseph R P @ 2021-07-24 04:42 | 1 | 2021-07-24 18:34 | Carnildo | I've noticed a few errors in this changeset:* Where southbound Ash Street divides in two, both sides of the split are roads, and both of them go by the name "Ash Street".* There's a similar issue where southbound Maple Street comes off the bridge: both pieces prior to the m... |
| 107407270 by Howpper @ 2021-07-04 21:25 | 1 | 2021-07-05 19:36 | Carnildo | Really damn minor state route. |
| 107283749 by Jean G - Spokane @ 2021-07-02 01:02 | 1 | 2021-07-02 01:37 | Carnildo | You added the description "Adequate gravel Equestrian Trailer parking" to a number of things that don't look much like parking lots. Was this a mistake? |
| 2 | 2021-07-02 17:32 | Jean G - Spokane ♦1 | Mistake, looking to find and fix. | |
| 105647209 by Josh Crawford @ 2021-05-31 23:17 | 1 | 2021-06-01 19:29 | Carnildo | When you merged the road, you also tagged the whole thing as a bridge, and dropped the units on the speed limit (so it's now marked as 35 km/h rather than 35 mph). I've fixed it, but please be more careful in the future. |
| 2 | 2021-06-01 23:39 | Josh Crawford ♦1 | Thank you for the feedback and fix. | |
| 105448474 by VLD161 @ 2021-05-27 20:24 | 1 | 2021-05-27 22:49 | Carnildo | Your aim seems to be a bit off: you renamed Silver Creek as "South 3rd Street". |
| 104146594 by bas57 @ 2021-05-04 21:10 | 1 | 2021-05-04 22:40 | Carnildo | Please don't use Esri Clarity when deciding if something still exists or not -- it's the oldest available imagery. Relying on it can cause you to delete driveways that were recently constructed, like you did in Deer Park. |
| 102056770 by geomap6 @ 2021-03-31 12:46 | 1 | 2021-04-28 23:05 | Carnildo | You've drawn the Trout Creek NRT as overlapping the Hope Valley road. Do the two share a route? |
| 2 | 2021-04-29 11:32 | geomap6 ♦11 | Thanks a lot for spotting this, I have fixed it. | |
| 103731700 by deven_smith_ @ 2021-04-27 21:05 | 1 | 2021-04-27 22:34 | Carnildo | Looks good to me. |
| 103439756 by snarkyclarky @ 2021-04-22 22:16 | 1 | 2021-04-23 02:23 | Carnildo | Please pay more attention to what RapiD is telling you to do: in three cases, you've mapped multiple buildings as one, and in one case, you've mapped two buildings as attached when they're actually separate. |
| 2 | 2021-04-23 02:31 | snarkyclarky ♦6 | With RapiD there can potentially be some very small mistakes such as building grouping that you’ve pointed out due to varying proximities and satellite imagery. As a fellow contributor you are more than welcome to edit the map to fix anything you see unfit. Thank you! | |
| 3 | 2021-04-23 02:41 | Carnildo | "Some very small mistakes" is understating it. In my experience with RapiD, it's got about a 10% error in the sort of area you've been mapping -- one building detection out of every ten is bad. | |
| 4 | 2021-04-23 02:52 | snarkyclarky ♦6 | Based on the area you’re denoting it looks like the building errors are very insignificant to the locale. This doesn’t seem to be any cause for alarm or any interference with core features. While using RapiD I try my best to phase out any errors I see, but may not be able to catch all of... | |
| 103212218 by deven_smith_ @ 2021-04-19 16:41 | 1 | 2021-04-19 18:31 | Carnildo | The "DIY Store" tag is meant for places like Home Depot. Horizon Distributors looks like it might be a "Trade Shop", while I don't know how to tag a heavy-equipment dealer like Vermeer Rocky Mountain. |
| 2 | 2021-04-20 01:07 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | Didn't realize there was a trade shop tag, thanks for the info. I'll use commercial/industrial building tags for places I can't tell what tag would work best | |
| 101807749 by funwhilelost @ 2021-03-26 17:25 | 1 | 2021-03-31 07:45 | Carnildo | Could you please not attach areas (such as parks) to roads? It makes it difficult to edit the roads particularly if they need to be split to do things like adjust speed limits. |
| 2 | 2025-01-24 21:19 | funwhilelost ♦6 | Great input, thanks! | |
| 101777811 by pbobbili @ 2021-03-26 09:12 | 1 | 2021-03-29 00:57 | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset. There's heavy construction in the area, and many of the changes were based on outdated imagery. |
| 2 | 2021-03-29 07:23 | pbobbili ♦4 | HiThank you for reviewing the edit, Apologies for the wrong edit. I've missed to check the latest imagery, It is an honest mistake from my end. I will be extra cautious going forward. Happy to learn from you!Regards,pbobbili | |
| 101773862 by pareps @ 2021-03-26 08:21 | 1 | 2021-03-28 06:55 | Carnildo | Please be more careful. You turned the Hayden city limits into a service road here. |
| 2 | 2021-03-29 07:26 | pareps ♦2 | Hi, Thank you for reviewing the changeset and making changes. It is an honest mistake from my end. I will be extra cautious going forward. Happy to learn from you! Regards,pareps | |
| 101523070 by listen-g @ 2021-03-22 18:25 | 1 | 2021-03-23 18:38 | Carnildo | I think your aim needs work. The building you tagged as "Spokane County Superior Court, 1116 West Broadway" is rather prominently labeled on its south wall as "Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway". The Superior Court is in the County Courthouse building or ... |
| 101348860 by Mark Clayton @ 2021-03-19 19:23 | 1 | 2021-03-20 20:07 | Carnildo | You don't need to map businesses as both a node and an area. Doing so just makes them show up twice on the map and in search results. |
| 101285585 by Montebest @ 2021-03-18 21:07 | 1 | 2021-03-19 09:15 | Carnildo | While making these changes, you orthogonalized a section of National Forest boundary. I've reverted the change, but please be more careful in the future. |
| 2 | 2021-03-19 16:47 | Montebest ♦1 | Thanks for doing that, sorry to cause a headache. | |
| 101217904 by Mark Clayton @ 2021-03-17 23:46 | 1 | 2021-03-18 08:15 | Carnildo | Do you have evidence that Old Eureka Airport was not closed 35 years ago like the description indicates? It sure looks closed in the aerial imagery: the runway has Xs painted at the ends indicating closure, and the taxiways have fallen into disrepair. |
| 100756923 by bas57 @ 2021-03-10 07:19 | 1 | 2021-03-11 06:32 | Carnildo | You're using the wrong sort of gate tag here: the tag you're using is for these: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c7/JesusGreenLock-Cambridge.jpg |
| 100727934 by DJ Cane @ 2021-03-09 18:31 | 1 | 2021-03-10 06:21 | Carnildo | Is that spelling correct, or should it be "Triple"? |
| 2 | 2021-03-10 06:25 | DJ Cane ♦3 | The spelling is correct. I don’t know how it came to have two p’s, but it does. Older topo maps also have the hill it’s named for as Tripple. | |
| 100448983 by Mdsypher @ 2021-03-04 22:25 | 1 | 2021-03-07 08:26 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted the golf-course outline here? |
| 2 | 2021-03-10 05:58 | Carnildo | I've reverted the deletion. | |
| 100609205 by Mark Clayton @ 2021-03-08 06:18 | 1 | 2021-03-09 06:21 | Carnildo | "Delete and re-create" really isn't the best way to re-align something. It tends to lose information such as runway surfaces or railway buffer stops. |
| 100210423 by PJ_33 @ 2021-03-01 13:42 | 1 | 2021-03-04 18:57 | jguthula ♦65 | Hi Pj_33,Welcome to OSM. I don't think the modifications you are making to the map are accurate. The roads you modified in this changesets were either service or residential roads. More information on road classification can be found in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway . Plea... |
| 2 | 2021-03-05 19:22 | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset. | |
| 100210736 by PJ_33 @ 2021-03-01 13:47 | 1 | 2021-03-05 19:22 | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset. |
| 100156889 by bas57 @ 2021-02-28 21:13 | 1 | 2021-03-01 05:27 | Carnildo | The "Maxar Premium" imagery is slightly newer than the default "Bing" imagery in this area, and shows that a driveway you deleted actually exists. |
| 2 | 2021-03-01 15:03 | bas57 ♦2 | Hi Carnildo, How do I go back and look to see what I have delete? Thanks | |
| 3 | 2021-03-01 21:35 | Carnildo | There are a number of changeset viewers. I prefer Achavi (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=100156889), but OSMCha (https://osmcha.org/changesets/100156889/) is also popular. | |
| 100055232 by jcp777 @ 2021-02-26 13:52 | 1 | 2021-02-27 19:27 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you turned Peterson Elementary School into a park? |
| 99847604 by deven_smith_ @ 2021-02-23 18:22 | 1 | 2021-02-24 06:55 | Carnildo | Some renderers treat anything with a layer of less than 0 as being underground. If you've got a situation where two above-ground objects intersect (such as a service road running under a gas-station canopy), it's better to raise the canopy than to lower the road. |
| 2 | 2021-02-25 22:30 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | Noted, thanks for the tip | |
| 99710018 by ruohao1 @ 2021-02-22 04:21 | 1 | 2021-02-22 05:10 | Carnildo | There are a number of major errors here:1) You added a group of roads, but failed to connect them to the larger road network.2) You tagged them as "living street", but two of them are residential roads and the third is a driveway.3) You added three parks that aren't parks, the... |
| 99704076 by ruohao1 @ 2021-02-22 00:30 | 1 | 2021-02-22 04:49 | Carnildo | There are almost no "living streets" in the United States. If you see something that looks like it might be one, it's probably a residential street, service road, or footway. |
| 99703240 by ruohao1 @ 2021-02-21 23:34 | 1 | 2021-02-22 04:45 | Carnildo | Please don't just scribble out buildings. It takes hours to clean them up. |
| 99620969 by bas57 @ 2021-02-19 23:16 | 1 | 2021-02-21 05:21 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you tagged a section of WA-206 as "primary"? The usual convention is that state routes are tagged as "secondary" unless they're particularly significant or particularly minor (and WA-206 is verging on "particularly minor"). |
| 2 | 2021-02-22 15:23 | bas57 ♦2 | Hi Carnildo, I thought that I change it back before I save it. I went in and fix it. Thanks for letting me know. | |
| 99659328 by Denis001 @ 2021-02-20 20:37 | 1 | 2021-02-20 22:46 | datamongers ♦55 | Adding " campsite" on the spur trails to campsites is probably not necessary. It's not how i would expect to see those trails labeled on official NPS maps, or on commercial maps. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/9965932... |
| 2 | 2021-02-20 23:39 | Carnildo | It's also not how they're labeled on the signposts -- it's just a bare campsite number. | |
| 99654171 by Denis001 @ 2021-02-20 17:54 | 1 | 2021-02-20 22:17 | Carnildo | The Specimen Ridge trail doesn't have a bridge across the Lamar River, either. |
| 99654575 by Denis001 @ 2021-02-20 18:05 | 1 | 2021-02-20 22:13 | Carnildo | If the editor is telling you about a path that's crossing a river, don't just click the "add a bridge" button to make it go away. There very much isn't a bridge across Slough Creek at the spot you added one. |
| 99649743 by Denis001 @ 2021-02-20 16:16 | 1 | 2021-02-20 22:02 | Carnildo | Where are you getting the bridges on the Pelican Valley trail from? Aerial imagery doesn't show them. |
| 99608299 by Denis001 @ 2021-02-19 16:54 | 1 | 2021-02-20 21:24 | Carnildo | Why on Earth did you delete the Grand Prismatic Spring overlook? |
| 99542282 by Denis001 @ 2021-02-18 18:17 | 1 | 2021-02-18 21:07 | datamongers ♦55 | Thanks for the edit! You may want to check where you are getting your road names from, because several of these names have typos. The roads with "(private)" in the name should be tagged access=private and not have private in the name.I'm also a little skeptical of the "Canyon C... |
| 2 | 2021-02-18 21:36 | Denis001 ♦4 | Hi, I add the information private because in the past when I use Maps.me as a gps I drove on a private pathway without warning. The nane of the came from the https://www.nps.gov/tripideas/day-hikes-in-the-canyon-area.htm site. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-19 12:01 | datamongers ♦55 | I understand that you are trying to make maps.me better, but openstreetmap has accepted ways of doing things, and adding access restrictions in road names is not the right way. There is also no excuse for making spelling mistakes in road names and refusing to fix them.I have fixed all the name e... | |
| 4 | 2021-02-19 14:57 | Denis001 ♦4 | D'abord je ne refuse pas de faire de changements. J'estime que c'est informations sont importantes pour les futurs usagers. Il y a eu un incident il y a plusieurs années dans la région. Des touristes s'étaient engagés sur une route hivernale dans les ... | |
| 5 | 2021-02-19 15:17 | datamongers ♦55 | Sorry, i dont argue on the internet. | |
| 6 | 2021-02-20 19:12 | Carnildo | I know for sure that "Canyon Campground road" is wrong, and I'm reasonably sure the rest of the names are as well. (Source: my parents spent a season working at Canyon Campground.) I'll be reverting the batch. | |
| 7 | 2021-02-20 20:08 | Denis001 ♦4 | https://www.nps.gov/yell/planyourvisit/hiking.htm If you zoom on Canyon village this is were I found the information | |
| 8 | 2021-02-20 21:16 | Carnildo | That map says it's based on OpenStreetMap. | |
| 99606447 by Denis001 @ 2021-02-19 16:19 | 1 | 2021-02-20 20:01 | Carnildo | Liberty Cap isn't a mountain peak, it's a rock formation. |
| 99654959 by Denis001 @ 2021-02-20 18:16 | 1 | 2021-02-20 18:46 | Carnildo | As far as I can tell, the paths you deleted still exist. Why did you delete them? |
| 2 | 2021-02-20 19:04 | Denis001 ♦4 | i use the map of the Yeelowstate Park. When I see a pathway that the don't have on their map and I cannot see a pathway on google map or else i remove it. I you have the proof that the pathway exist add it. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-20 19:06 | Carnildo | I added those because I hiked them and have GPS traces showing the routing.OSM isn't supposed to be a copy of various official maps, it's supposed to be the result of looking at what's actually there. Just because something isn't on an official map isn't a reason to del... | |
| 4 | 2021-02-20 19:08 | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset. | |
| 5 | 2021-02-20 21:00 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Also note that copying or even checking against Google Maps is a violation of copyright. | |
| 99239930 by DENelson83 @ 2021-02-14 07:51 | 1 | 2021-02-18 00:15 | Carnildo | Where did you get this name from? The BC government has some very different names for this section of highway. |
| 2 | 2021-02-18 00:21 | DENelson83 ♦95 | Highway 97C is only known as the Okanagan Connector to the east of Merritt. I simply named the western portion of 97C after its two endpoints, Merritt and Cache Creek. | |
| 99263025 by jsb2017 @ 2021-02-14 18:55 | 1 | 2021-02-16 03:41 | Carnildo | The most common way to map a business inside a building is to add a point with the business information; a more detailed method is the Simple Indoor Tagging scheme: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_TaggingDrawing one building over another just confuses everyone involved. |
| 99019047 by cnagy @ 2021-02-10 06:41 | 1 | 2021-02-11 06:00 | Carnildo | I don't think an access of "permissive" is correct for something that's in a public park. |
| 2 | 2021-02-11 08:24 | cnagy ♦1 | Thanks, fixed. | |
| 98923401 by Joseph R P @ 2021-02-08 17:34 | 1 | 2021-02-09 09:54 | Carnildo | When you divide a road like you did at the intersection of Lancaster and US-95, please make sure you update the lane counts and move the traffic signals to the new intersection points. |
| 98870660 by DENelson83 @ 2021-02-08 01:23 | 1 | 2021-02-09 07:14 | Carnildo | How about we call it the "Elko-Roosville Highway", since that's what the BC government seems to call it: https://web.archive.org/web/20170105151258/http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/transportation/transportation-reports-and-reference/numbered-routes# |
| 2 | 2021-02-09 07:32 | DENelson83 ♦95 | Yeah. I just changed it to that.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98936870 | |
| 98658241 by funwhilelost @ 2021-02-03 17:19 | 1 | 2021-02-04 08:26 | Carnildo | The section of Palouse to Cascades going past Revere Wildlife Area looked reasonably cycleway-like when I hiked it a few months back. |
| 2 | 2021-02-06 03:30 | funwhilelost ♦6 | You know, I’ve gone back and forth on this. While it is a designated “cycleway” state park, it doesn’t convey a lot of information about the actual path, which varies considerably over its length. The relation makes it clear that it’s a big cycle path - see it on OpenCy... | |
| 3 | 2021-02-06 20:27 | Carnildo | The section between Revere Road and Imbler Creek is packed fine gravel. I don't know what it's like any further west than that. | |
| 4 | 2021-02-08 16:28 | funwhilelost ♦6 | Yeah, I agree with you, especially on the merits of "does it walk like a duck" which is stated in the wiki. I'll do my best to add surface and smoothness descriptors where I can. | |
| 98724340 by Mark Clayton @ 2021-02-04 19:36 | 1 | 2021-02-05 19:32 | Carnildo | Is US-2 physically divided here? Recent imagery isn't sharp enough to show something like a median barrier.If it isn't, then please don't map it as such -- with a pair of ways, there's nowhere to put the center turn lane that's visible in older imagery. |
| 98627754 by ju509 @ 2021-02-03 07:51 | 1 | 2021-02-04 07:31 | Carnildo | Is Rehmke Road really private along its entire length? |
| 2 | 2021-02-04 07:53 | ju509 ♦1 | At the least, it should be marked public in between the Siwash Creek Road and Fire Tools Road intersections. | |
| 98531906 by ColinQH @ 2021-02-01 19:57 | 1 | 2021-02-02 07:30 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!You specified a width of "8" for the trail. Any time units aren't specified, the OSM software assumes meters, which would make this as wide as a two-lane road. Should the width be changed to "8 ft"? |
| 98390151 by benweissMSO @ 2021-01-29 21:24 | 1 | 2021-01-30 08:46 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!I'm not sure what you were trying to do with the bicycle path on Trail Street, but drawing one thing over another like that confuses the heck out of route-finding software.If you were trying to indicate that the Milwaukee Trail follows Trail Street, that's done throu... |
| 2 | 2021-02-01 18:49 | benweissMSO ♦1 | Thanks for checking on this. The Milwaukee Trail does follow Trail Street. But, if it is already connected through the "Route Relation," why does it not show up as bike path in the symbology (those sections are blank/do not have blue dashed lines?) | |
| 3 | 2021-02-01 19:32 | Carnildo | Which map are you checking? The "standard" layer on OSM.org is designed around drawing streets, but if you click on the "layers" tab on the right, you can bring up the "CyclOSM" or "Cycle Map" layer, both of which have Trail Street highlighted in blue.The... | |
| 4 | 2021-02-01 19:43 | benweissMSO ♦1 | I'm looking at the CycleOSM layer and thinking that the blue highlight is for the entire route being on a regional trail network, but that it is somehow missing the dashed blue links where the trail is adjacent to roadway. I am trying to update the bike lanes, buffered bike lanes, cycle tra... | |
| 5 | 2021-02-01 21:08 | Carnildo | It takes time for changes to propagate to all the layers. Cycle Map has a two-week update frequency, which would explain why it's not showing your changes yet. | |
| 6 | 2022-08-01 17:54 | gpserror ♦221 | I removed the overlapping route in changeset 124358675 as another validation tool requested its revert as a MapRoulette task. In any case, to reiterate, it depends on the renderer whether the route is drawn with the dotted lines or whatnot. Again the CyclOSM/Cycle Map should be the ones that have ... | |
| 98134986 by bas57 @ 2021-01-25 16:46 | 1 | 2021-01-26 08:01 | Carnildo | Please don't abbreviate street names. It's easy enough for a computer to construct an abbreviation if it needs to save space, but it's impossible to go the other way. (For example, should "St" be expanded to "Street", "State", or "Saint"?) |
| 98130899 by Maria Alam @ 2021-01-25 15:16 | 1 | 2021-01-25 16:03 | ivanbranco ♦2,695 | Hi Maria,try to write a good changeset comment please, especially when the changeset area is so big.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#How_should_I_write_Changeset_Comments.3F |
| 2 | 2021-01-26 07:46 | Carnildo | Why are you putting multiple names into the "name" field? Spelling variations should go into the "alt_name" or "official_name" fields, while names in different languages should go in the appropriate multilingual name field. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-01 01:08 | SidusMap ♦5 | Country spanning changes should be heavily discouraged by iD editor. | |
| 97402855 by bnkhunter @ 2021-01-13 01:35 | 1 | 2021-01-13 18:39 | Carnildo | When did the trail numbers change? When I last hiked in the area, the signs still had the old numbers. |
| 2 | 2021-01-17 22:07 | Carnildo | I surveyed a batch of these yesterday, and in every case, the signs on the ground matched the old number or lack thereof. I'm reverting the whole set. | |
| 3 | 2021-01-24 05:20 | bnkhunter ♦1 | Trail numbers were updated to reflect the new Riverside State Park Trail Map published in 2020 by the www.riversidestateparkfoundation.org. The official map can be purchased at REI and other locations referenced in the foundation's web page. It would be nice to have the on-the-ground trail nu... | |
| 4 | 2021-01-24 07:00 | Carnildo | I don't see any value in having these numbers in OSM if they're not present on the signs. Without signs on the ground, they're useless for navigation. | |
| 97695201 by torapa @ 2021-01-18 11:32 | 1 | 2021-01-20 06:27 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you moved The Center of the Universe? |
| 2 | 2021-01-20 07:50 | torapa ♦6 | Hi there was a warning by JOSM, a combination of toursim with road is not allowed. | |
| 3 | 2021-01-20 19:19 | Carnildo | Sometimes you need to ignore the warnings and map what's actually there. The world is more complicated than JOSM's validator code realizes. | |
| 4 | 2021-01-21 07:14 | torapa ♦6 | ID also shows the same warning. | |
| 5 | 2021-01-21 18:32 | Carnildo | That's because neither the developer of iD nor the developer of JOSM expected the mayor of Wallace to proclaim the intersection of Bank and Sixth to be the Center of the Universe, and have a custom manhole cover made to mark the spot. | |
| 97622537 by cbeddow @ 2021-01-16 23:24 | 1 | 2021-01-18 08:46 | Carnildo | Are you sure you got the surface type correct here? I've never heard of a concrete soccer field, and these look like grass in the aerial imagery. |
| 2 | 2021-01-19 04:15 | cbeddow ♦26 | Thanks for the catch! I fixed it. I was using StreetComplete and updating the tennis courts but saw the icons all as tennis for some reason. Just resurveyed in person today (it's under snow though!) to make sure I didn't miss anything. | |
| 97464805 by Scrutator @ 2021-01-13 21:23 | 1 | 2021-01-14 08:06 | Carnildo | Looks like what's visible in the latest Sentinel imagery, but that's barely got sufficient resolution to spot roads. |
| 97340838 by GreenRunner0 @ 2021-01-12 04:37 | 1 | 2021-01-12 09:04 | Carnildo | You added a building labeled a "hanger" near Memaloose Airport, but it doesn't show up in any imagery. Where did you get it from? |
| 97313092 by jwneptune @ 2021-01-11 14:33 | 1 | 2021-01-11 23:12 | Carnildo | I'm not sure what you're trying to do, but it's not working, and it's making a mess of the map. |
| 97225032 by deven_smith_ @ 2021-01-09 18:50 | 1 | 2021-01-10 08:14 | Carnildo | You deleted a number of logging roads that appear to still exist. Is there a reason for that? |
| 2 | 2021-01-10 23:13 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | Yes, I plan to come back and re-add them, just had to figure out who actually owns and manages the land since I know it's various logging companies. The land it usually not accessible besides a few roads (the roads I left and classified minor). | |
| 96947884 by snarkyclarky @ 2021-01-05 05:09 | 1 | 2021-01-05 19:39 | Carnildo | Two requests:1. If you're going to delete and re-draw a building, make sure you copy all the information over. When you re-drew the Kennedy Apartments, you lost the fact that it was a five-story apartment building.2. If you're using RapiD to add buildings, check the suggestions ag... |
| 96216496 by jbunkport @ 2020-12-21 20:40 | 1 | 2020-12-22 07:57 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted a driveway here? |
| 96147548 by geoengineer44 @ 2020-12-20 16:59 | 1 | 2020-12-20 22:43 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted the Edge Steakhouse? As far as I can tell, both the business and the building still exist. |
| 2 | 2020-12-20 22:56 | geoengineer44 ♦2 | I wasn't planning on having it in my course. Do I need to add it back in? | |
| 3 | 2020-12-21 18:46 | Carnildo | Yes. OpenStreetMap isn't just an editor for a golf game. It's a map used by hundreds of millions of people around the world. | |
| 4 | 2020-12-22 23:27 | Something B ♦142 | This changeset been reverted (96284430). | |
| 96028340 by Oregonian3 @ 2020-12-17 21:18 | 1 | 2020-12-18 07:23 | Carnildo | Not sure I agree with a couple of these changes.* Wells Road/Walker Road is not a major route between anywhere and anywhere -- according to the county's data, it sees less than 400 cars a day. Most traffic from Malden heads to Rosalia, and from there either north to Spokane or south to Col... |
| 2 | 2020-12-18 13:48 | Oregonian3 ♦47 | Wells Road was pretty much the last road I upgraded to secondary, as the route from Cheney to Malden. I wouldn't object if someone else changed it back to secondary.Sunset Highway, I'm more inclined to say my change was justified. Definitely secondary, but I can't see how it would... | |
| 3 | 2020-12-18 18:38 | Carnildo | Sunset isn't faster, but it's safer: the freeway on-ramps in downtown Spokane are uphill climbs with very short merges. Since it's only a minute or two longer, this draws off a lot of traffic that would otherwise take westbound I-90. | |
| 4 | 2020-12-19 16:41 | Oregonian3 ♦47 | Ah, that is a fair point. Perhaps it would make sense to upgrade the westbound lanes to primary while keeping the eastbound lanes at secondary then between Maple/Walnut and US 2 (since the road has split carriageways for part of it)? | |
| 96032242 by Oregonian3 @ 2020-12-18 00:10 | 1 | 2020-12-18 08:08 | Carnildo | I strongly disagree with calling Trent Avenue "tertiary". Apart from being a state highway (and thus, secondary at a minimum), it carries on the order of 7,000 vehicles a day, making it a major part of the road network. |
| 2 | 2020-12-18 13:45 | Oregonian3 ♦47 | Thanks for the comment. 7000 is SIGNIFICANTLY lower than all of the other primary and most of the secondary roads in the area. I think primary was major overclassification, wouldn't object if you were to re-upgrade it to secondary. | |
| 96010873 by geoengineer44 @ 2020-12-17 14:08 | 1 | 2020-12-17 18:11 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you don't want these bridges to be mapped? |
| 2 | 2020-12-17 18:18 | geoengineer44 ♦2 | I’m new to this mapping stuff…I’m told that the bridges are better when inserted within the TGC 2019 software. I’m still trying to make that determination. | |
| 3 | 2020-12-18 05:06 | Carnildo | Keep in mind that TGC 2019 is far from the only program using OpenStreetMap data. For example, if you don't map bridges, they won't show up if the golf course uses Mapbox to put a map of the course on their website. | |
| 94808210 by freyaavion @ 2020-11-26 03:17 | 1 | 2020-11-28 21:06 | Carnildo | The intersection of Cincinnati and Mission was recently re-worked, and it's not physically possible to go between the south section of Cincinnati and westbound Mission. |
| 2 | 2020-12-17 20:18 | freyaavion ♦4 | hmm. I'll have to look into that. this is the proposed route. | |
| 3 | 2020-12-17 20:57 | Carnildo | I re-surveyed it recently. Turns out there's a pocket turn lane from westbound Mission to southbound Cincinnati that I missed in my initial survey. | |
| 95065617 by freyaavion @ 2020-11-30 19:41 | 1 | 2020-12-01 05:32 | Carnildo | Is the former ShopKo building really disused, or just vacant? |
| 2 | 2020-12-17 20:14 | freyaavion ♦4 | vacant i believe. are there better tags? | |
| 3 | 2020-12-17 20:55 | Carnildo | There's `shop=vacant`, which should prompt StreetComplete to ask if there's something new there every year or so. | |
| 95944567 by geoengineer44 @ 2020-12-16 13:25 | 1 | 2020-12-16 18:28 | Carnildo | Don't do that.If your golf program doesn't understand roads, fix the program, don't break the map for everyone else. |
| 95894639 by freyaavion @ 2020-12-15 18:43 | 1 | 2020-12-15 19:50 | Carnildo | You beat me to it. |
| 95837032 by Kristjan ESPERANTO @ 2020-12-14 23:09 | 1 | 2020-12-14 23:18 | Carnildo | Is the address really disused? |
| 2 | 2020-12-15 00:23 | Kristjan ESPERANTO ♦56 | Okay, you are right. That was too much. I removed the "disused" from the address tags. Thanks :-) | |
| 95706118 by deven_smith_ @ 2020-12-11 22:27 | 1 | 2020-12-12 06:57 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted the roads "CR5067" and "CR5069"? |
| 2 | 2020-12-12 07:27 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | Yes, the houses on those roads are linked to Rail Canyon Road according to the Stevens County Property map. I plan to come back and fix all the roads around here | |
| 95498099 by Mark Clayton @ 2020-12-08 16:01 | 1 | 2020-12-09 05:39 | Carnildo | The "Danger Area" tag is meant for things like minefields or bombing ranges, not industrial hazards. |
| 95400928 by lake3kfe9w3 @ 2020-12-07 07:16 | 1 | 2020-12-08 05:52 | Carnildo | If you're going to use RapID to edit, please pay more attention to what the AI is suggesting. For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881909674 appears to be some sort of weird hybrid of two different roads. |
| 95390876 by kvss @ 2020-12-07 04:26 | 1 | 2020-12-08 05:29 | Carnildo | Please be more careful. You broke the Spokane city limits with this edit. |
| 2 | 2020-12-08 08:53 | kvss ♦7 | Hi,Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for wrong edit, will ensure to be more careful while making the edits. Looking forward to learn more from you.Thanks and Regards,kvss | |
| 95383190 by Scrutator @ 2020-12-06 22:19 | 1 | 2020-12-07 18:25 | Carnildo | Speed limit: 6 mph. Is that a typo, or are they using an oddball speed limit to get people to pay attention? |
| 2 | 2020-12-07 19:03 | Scrutator ♦2 | 6 MPH is really posted here. I drove it last week. See the photos of their map posted at the registration building: https://photos.app.goo.gl/PzgsTgT7BqJxNrNr5 | |
| 95267464 by deven_smith_ @ 2020-12-04 05:43 | 1 | 2020-12-04 18:04 | Carnildo | Did you mean to move Jalisco Market? The new location is on the other side of the state line, and doesn't even look like a building. |
| 95250528 by DuncanN @ 2020-12-03 21:49 | 1 | 2020-12-04 06:07 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!Please don't attach land areas to roads. It makes it tricky to edit the road if it needs to be split (eg. to add a school zone speed limit), and if someone ever comes up with a good way to map roads as areas, it doesn't leave anywhere for the road surface to be drawn. |
| 95247785 by Johnny Schulte @ 2020-12-03 20:28 | 1 | 2020-12-04 05:58 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!Please don't abbreviate names. It's easy for a computer to construct abbreviations if it needs to save space, but going the other direction can't be done reliably (should "Ln" be expanded to "Lane", or "Line"?). |
| 95127292 by Chris2233 @ 2020-12-02 04:30 | 1 | 2020-12-02 05:17 | Carnildo | You missed a few. |
| 2 | 2020-12-02 09:46 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Account blocked by DWG:https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4263 Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 95066490 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-11-30 20:06 | 1 | 2020-12-01 05:47 | Carnildo | When you're replacing a building outline, please be sure you're copying all the information across, including the address and opening hours. |
| 95015844 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-11-30 04:59 | 1 | 2020-11-30 18:40 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted an apartment complex here? |
| 95013963 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-11-30 04:19 | 1 | 2020-11-30 18:31 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted a dozen parking lots here? According to the aerial imagery, they still exist. |
| 95007737 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-11-30 01:24 | 1 | 2020-11-30 05:07 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you renamed the Stillwater River to the Flathead River? |
| 94966436 by freyaavion @ 2020-11-29 02:28 | 1 | 2020-11-29 20:40 | Carnildo | Did something go wrong with setting up the route master relation here? The "Bus 4" relation has the "5 Mile P&R => Downtown => Moran Station" relation in it 33 times. |
| 2 | 2020-12-17 20:16 | freyaavion ♦4 | geez, i guess so, thanks for catching that. I'll fix it now | |
| 94924289 by fogey @ 2020-11-28 04:08 | 1 | 2020-11-29 04:12 | Carnildo | When mapping small towns like this, I find it useful to toggle back and forth between NAIP and Esri Clarity as the background image. Esri Clarity is the oldest imagery available, but it's also usually the sharpest, which makes it easier to spot things like building outlines that are actually t... |
| 2 | 2022-04-26 09:42 | fogey ♦10 | ok | |
| 94804818 by freyaavion @ 2020-11-26 01:32 | 1 | 2020-11-28 21:00 | Carnildo | Some of these platforms (eg. Pacific @ Hemlock) have already been mapped. Could you merge your additions with the existing ones? |
| 2 | 2020-12-17 20:26 | freyaavion ♦4 | I wasn't sure if that made sense considering these proposed stops would be considerably different than the current stops and might continue to be used separately. What do you think? i was just planning to keep them as is until we have more info. | |
| 94783150 by Richard @ 2020-11-25 14:59 | 1 | 2020-11-26 06:28 | Carnildo | I don't think this is correct. I don't know about any of the others, but the saddle point at Kingman Pass is somewhere in the bed of Glen Creek, not on the road. |
| 2 | 2020-11-26 06:37 | Carnildo | Just checked a second one, and from the aerial imagery and topo maps, it looks like Expedition Pass Trail runs along the side of the Expedition Pass saddle. | |
| 3 | 2020-11-26 09:19 | Richard ♦220 | Thanks - I'll revert and take another look. I wonder if we need an extra tagging solution of some sort - certainly passes/saddles are often described as being on a road (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingman_Pass) and cyclists/hikers would consider themselves passing over it, even if the a... | |
| 4 | 2020-11-26 09:21 | Richard ♦220 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94826785 where the changeset comment is: Let's try again... | |
| 5 | 2020-11-26 17:54 | Carnildo | Passes are fuzzy areas, typically considered to be everything between the two nearest high points or false summits. OSM's got the "mountain pass" key (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mountain_pass) for the high point where a highway goes through one. Sometimes this correspon... | |
| 6 | 2020-11-27 19:43 | Richard ♦220 | That's probably a good workaround - I was wondering about whether to map it as a way, but mountain_pass is a smart idea. Thanks. | |
| 94558076 by Natfoot @ 2020-11-21 19:13 | 1 | 2020-11-22 02:48 | Carnildo | Please stop using RapiD for mapping. By my count, you're currently running slightly under 90% accuracy when adding buildings, which just isn't good enough, particularly when you're making mistakes such as adding round buildings as square ones. |
| 94533554 by Natfoot @ 2020-11-21 07:03 | 1 | 2020-11-22 01:20 | Carnildo | Please pay attention to what the AI is telling you to do. For example, in this changeset, you tagged three sets of bleachers as two buildings. |
| 94529339 by Natfoot @ 2020-11-21 01:49 | 1 | 2020-11-21 18:31 | Carnildo | When you're adding these buildings, please check against the latest imagery. For Spokane County, NAIP is currently the latest, while in urban areas, Bing is only a few weeks older and much sharper. It looks like RapiD is using Esri Clarity, which is usually the oldest. |
| 94397823 by funwhilelost @ 2020-11-18 22:09 | 1 | 2020-11-19 17:50 | Carnildo | Thanks for clearing up those fixmes. Fields Spring is about a five-hour round trip for me, so it's not somewhere I get to very often. |
| 2 | 2020-11-19 18:48 | funwhilelost ♦6 | Oh, cool! It's only an hour from me and I was excited to find some early snow there last week. I'll keep adding some more fidelity to the west side. Is there a way you can get notifications on areas you frequent? | |
| 3 | 2020-11-19 18:58 | Carnildo | I use the history tab on the OSM site, zoomed to give me a view of Eastern Washington/Northern Idaho/Western Montana. Another popular option is OSMCha (https://osmcha.org/), which has all sorts of filtering options. | |
| 94401820 by Mark Clayton @ 2020-11-19 01:00 | 1 | 2020-11-19 18:08 | Carnildo | I don't think the entire area is a single building. You probably want to use the "apartment complex" tag here. |
| 94400795 by Plileyr @ 2020-11-19 00:02 | 1 | 2020-11-19 06:17 | 3ngineer ♦47 | This looks like spam. You added "North Pole" as a city and as a church name. |
| 2 | 2020-11-19 18:06 | Carnildo | "North Pole, Alaska" is a real place, and it's not unreasonable to expect it to have a church: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Pole,_Alaska | |
| 3 | 2020-11-19 18:14 | 3ngineer ♦47 | Wow, amazing! Please excuse my lack of research. | |
| 94398050 by AlfonsoRH @ 2020-11-18 22:17 | 1 | 2020-11-19 17:41 | Carnildo | Why did you delete South 118th Street? Aerial imagery shows something reasonably street-like in that location. |
| 94298929 by DJ Cane @ 2020-11-17 18:18 | 1 | 2020-11-18 18:37 | Carnildo | You appear to have tagged a number of electric poles as "power=line" rather than "power=pole" or "power=tower". |
| 94258931 by iggujja @ 2020-11-17 08:50 | 1 | 2020-11-18 06:19 | Carnildo | Where are you getting this service road from? It's not in any of the imagery, and I don't recall one in the area from the last time I visited. |
| 2 | 2020-11-19 05:47 | iggujja ♦5 | Hi,Thank you for reviewing the edit, Apologies for the incorrect addition of road, missed to check the latest imagery. I've made the necessary changes under the changeset(#: 94411729). Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,iggujja | |
| 93030929 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-10-25 22:20 | 1 | 2020-10-27 04:47 | Carnildo | Is there a reason you deleted a bunch of sidewalks and the Kalispell Police Department? |
| 2 | 2020-11-15 18:10 | Carnildo | I've reverted the deletion. | |
| 94047468 by avssr @ 2020-11-13 08:49 | 1 | 2020-11-14 18:10 | Carnildo | It's not a track just because it's in a forest. Most of these appear to be badly-mapped driveways or residential roads. |
| 2 | 2020-11-17 05:45 | avssr ♦5 | Hi,Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the wrong addition of track highway tag, will ensure not to repeat such errors. Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,avssr | |
| 93957954 by Bradhe @ 2020-11-12 01:32 | 1 | 2020-11-12 19:00 | Carnildo | Are you sure this name is correct? Everything I can find says that the old name was the correct one. |
| 93955999 by deven_smith_ @ 2020-11-11 23:32 | 1 | 2020-11-12 18:44 | Carnildo | When you're dividing a road like you did here, make sure you update the information on that road. Before I fixed it, the southern half of Francis was labeled as being five lanes wide with lanes running both directions despite being a one-way road, while the northern half didn't even have ... |
| 2 | 2020-11-12 23:39 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | Ah I forgot about those details, I thought I made sure I fixed that, sorry! | |
| 93884420 by VLD161 @ 2020-11-10 21:19 | 1 | 2020-11-11 03:40 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you disconnected the path leading to a boat launch from the boat launch itself? |
| 2 | 2020-11-11 17:25 | VLD161 ♦3 | Was fixing a crossing way issue and have added the connection back. | |
| 93814576 by deven_smith_ @ 2020-11-09 18:32 | 1 | 2020-11-10 08:27 | Carnildo | Negative layer numbers are traditionally used for underground objects. If the editor is warning you about a sidewalk crossing a roof-only building, the correct fix is to put the roof on layer 1, not to put the sidewalk on layer -1. |
| 93759468 by Timothy Smith @ 2020-11-08 22:48 | 1 | 2020-11-10 07:43 | Carnildo | As far as I can tell, the "car wash" you added is a defunct car wash with a building still prominently labeled "Car Wash" with an equally prominent "Car Wash" sign out front. |
| 2 | 2020-11-10 17:52 | Timothy Smith ♦43 | Thanks for making the update | |
| 93724956 by deven_smith_ @ 2020-11-08 00:32 | 1 | 2020-11-08 08:54 | Carnildo | When you're tracing buildings, please square your corners (select the building and hit the "Q" key). It makes for much nicer-looking outlines. |
| 93556990 by Richie Schut @ 2020-11-04 18:10 | 1 | 2020-11-05 08:31 | Carnildo | Thanks. That'd been bothering me for a while, but I hadn't been able to get up there to check things out. |
| 93534425 by sunaman @ 2020-11-04 10:23 | 1 | 2020-11-05 06:27 | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset. There's been some recent construction in the area, and even the latest imagery is outdated. |
| 2 | 2020-11-06 06:46 | sunaman ♦2 | Hi,Thank you for correcting the edit and providing the information about the area. Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,sunaman | |
| 93515210 by Minh Nguyen @ 2020-11-04 05:17 | 1 | 2020-11-04 09:35 | Carnildo | Please don't do huge edits like this. It's not showing up properly in any of the QA tools, so it's impossible to tell if there are any mistakes. |
| 2 | 2020-11-07 20:01 | Minh Nguyen ♦562 | Sorry, I won’t do it again. If it helps, https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ZQ8 returns elements that were added or changed in this changeset. A more sophisticated attic query could return deleted elements as well. | |
| 3 | 2020-11-09 02:39 | skquinn ♦803 | Agree with Carnildo here; these should be split into smaller changesets. I do appreciate the spirit of generally fixing up things across the country on Election Day, though. | |
| 4 | 2024-10-02 17:17 | Arlo James Barnes ♦100 | funny that I was about to do something similar on a local scale when I decided to see what changeset last touched a commercial area with a voting location for _this_ election cycle... | |
| 93492524 by brownbray @ 2020-11-03 16:02 | 1 | 2020-11-04 08:02 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you turned a religious school into a church? |
| 93446122 by TokyoJoe @ 2020-11-03 01:26 | 1 | 2020-11-03 18:30 | Carnildo | I noticed you added a bunch of nodes with nothing but an elevation tag. Was this intentional? |
| 2 | 2020-11-03 21:55 | TokyoJoe ♦2 | They are not isolated nodes - they are part of ways such as waterways, ridges and highways. The elevation tag is intended to be a spot height along the stream, road or ridgeway. | |
| 93419786 by rekulc1 @ 2020-11-02 12:18 | 1 | 2020-11-03 07:04 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted the road? |
| 2 | 2020-11-03 10:37 | rekulc1 ♦8 | Hi Carnildo,I have deleted the road based on street side in which it looked like a water tunnel, is it a golf cart path? please give your suggestions about the area, I will edit them accordingly. Thanks,rekulc1. | |
| 3 | 2020-11-03 18:19 | Carnildo | In my survey notes, I described it as "a bridge or tunnel" in the area of a golf course. Judging from the aerial imagery, it's a culvert-style tunnel containing either a service road or a golf cart path connecting two halves of a golf course.In the western United States, a common... | |
| 4 | 2020-11-05 06:16 | rekulc1 ♦8 | "Hi,Thanks for the suggestions, I've made the necessary changes under the changeset(#93577607). Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,rekulc1." | |
| 93399781 by ruohao1 @ 2020-11-02 07:17 | 1 | 2020-11-03 06:40 | Carnildo | Could you please use more descriptive changeset comments? It makes it easier to figure out what you're trying to do. |
| 92841662 by PhillipCarew @ 2020-10-21 15:19 | 1 | 2020-10-23 06:48 | Carnildo | Is Meridian Road really one-way over its full length? The road markings don't look correct for that. |
| 2 | 2020-10-23 13:49 | PhillipCarew ♦14 | I see my error, thank for you bringing this to my attention, I have fixed the one way tag and split the way. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92953303 | |
| 92784726 by deven_smith_ @ 2020-10-20 18:11 | 1 | 2020-10-22 04:46 | Carnildo | Rocky Lake Road looks like a fairly substantial road in the aerial imagery. Are you sure it's a track and not a regular road? |
| 2 | 2020-10-22 15:12 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | Yes I am positive it isn't a regular road beyond that point. It isn't maintained by the county beyond that point and is mainly used as an access road for the piece of DNR land it goes through. Maybe it can considered a minor/unclassified, but I considered it a track roadI have place Ge... | |
| 3 | 2020-10-22 17:56 | Carnildo | Official maintenance isn't the only reason to call something "not a track". If it can be easily driven by an ordinary car, rather than requiring something high-clearance, I'd call it "minor/unclassified" at least to the turnoff of the Rocky Lake boat launch. | |
| 92733599 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-10-20 01:52 | 1 | 2020-10-20 20:45 | Carnildo | Please be more careful when you're adding buildings. In particular, this building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/860887050) was already on the map as "recently demolished". |
| 2 | 2020-10-20 21:01 | Carnildo | Could you please pay more attention to what the AI is telling you to do? By my count, this changeset mapped: 1) A building that was actually three buildings, 2) A building overlapping a parking lot, 3) A building that was demolished about five years ago, 4) A building that was actually two building... | |
| 92663587 by John Hanover @ 2020-10-18 17:07 | 1 | 2020-10-19 09:22 | Carnildo | Are you sure about the routing of Bacon Loop Trail? When I hiked it about a decade and a half ago, it had just (as in, earlier that week) been re-routed away from Bean Creek, and no longer followed the lines on the topo map. |
| 2 | 2020-10-20 21:18 | John Hanover ♦16 | I traced the trails in this area using USFS trail data, most of which looks to have been gathered with GPS. I'm unsure of how recently this data was collected and it is possible the trail has been re-routed since then. The USFS data shows the trail a ways up the slope from where it is shown on ... | |
| 3 | 2021-06-24 22:46 | dschneiderch ♦1 | The trail from west side to bacon lake is spot on. i hiked it last summer. where did you get up to date usfs trail data? When I pull the tile server data from https://apps.fs.usda.gov/arcx/rest/services/EDW/EDW_FSTopo_01/MapServer/WMTS/tile/1.0.0/EDW_EDW_TrailNFSPublish_01 it still shows the old tr... | |
| 4 | 2021-07-01 20:51 | John Hanover ♦16 | I typically use the National Forest System Trails shapefile downloaded from https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?dsetCategory=transportation. I then import the file into QGIS and extract small portions of it as GPX files, which i then trace over in JOSM. So far this is the best sour... | |
| 92608003 by brownbray @ 2020-10-16 23:33 | 1 | 2020-10-19 08:05 | Carnildo | When you're moving business information to building outlines like you did here, could you please make sure you don't delete address information in the process? |
| 92440704 by Omnific @ 2020-10-13 22:30 | 1 | 2020-10-14 21:11 | Carnildo | In the southwest corner of this group of buildings, you've drawn what looks like a single large building in six separate parts. Is there a reason for this? |
| 2 | 2020-10-14 22:30 | Omnific ♦202 | Well, when I was check it from the Streetside imagery, it looked like each section of the River House condos was a separate unit, so I kinda guessed the shape so that eventually each could be addressed separately. Don't want to step on any toes here, so I went ahead and deleted it, and added a ... | |
| 3 | 2020-10-15 05:53 | Carnildo | Generally the only reason to map individual units as separate outlines is if they're physically independent -- you could knock one down and the others would stay standing. That's usually quite obvious from looking at the roof, and the roof of this building is just as clearly a single piec... | |
| 92434160 by SharonPA @ 2020-10-13 18:48 | 1 | 2020-10-15 05:24 | Carnildo | Thanks for your contributions!The best available imagery for rural Spokane County is generally "Esri World Imagery". It's not quite as new as the default Bing imagery, but it's far sharper. You can access it through the 'background settings' panel (the button that... |
| 91464682 by Scrutator @ 2020-09-24 19:54 | 1 | 2020-09-27 04:48 | Carnildo | Is Whipsaw Lane really a zero-lane road? |
| 2 | 2020-09-27 18:57 | Scrutator ♦2 | I corrected it. Thanks for catching it. | |
| 91323688 by Hakkiron @ 2020-09-23 01:23 | 1 | 2020-09-25 04:28 | Carnildo | Are you sure all those buildings survived the fire? The latest Copernicus imagery shows that as one of the more heavily-burned parts of town. |
| 91323757 by AlexAnne Pitts @ 2020-09-23 01:27 | 1 | 2020-09-23 20:42 | Carnildo | Are you sure that 1) the buildings you're adding survived the fire, and 2) that they're buildings? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85031847 in particular, to the best of my knowledge, is a parked semitrailer. |
| 91194134 by deven_smith_ @ 2020-09-21 03:00 | 1 | 2020-09-21 10:20 | Carnildo | You appear to have deleted a couple of fairly significant Forest Service roads here (NFD 550 and NFD 570). Is there a reason for that? |
| 2 | 2020-09-21 21:09 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | Ah shoot, no. I was going to replace them redrawn with current day imagery and then I got distracted. I'll get to fixing that now | |
| 90879652 by deven_smith_ @ 2020-09-14 17:56 | 1 | 2020-09-15 02:42 | Carnildo | Bigelow Gulch wasn't physically divided at the Argonne interchange when I drove through a couple weeks back, but it did have a two-way center-turn lane. Why have you mapped it as a divided road without a center-turn lane? |
| 2 | 2020-09-15 16:01 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | I changed it because I thought, and you can explain why I am wrong, it made more sense with the rest of the Bigelow Gulch projects that the road should be marked divided. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-15 23:13 | Carnildo | Mapping a road as divided should generally only be done when it's physically divided. There are some exceptions (for example, if the road is *legally* divided by having four yellow stripes down the middle, and is an extension of a physically-divided road, such as with Sunset Highway approachin... | |
| 90878349 by deven_smith_ @ 2020-09-14 17:23 | 1 | 2020-09-15 08:23 | Carnildo | Could you be a bit more careful with your editing? You keep attaching things to the Gas Transmissions Northwest pipeline, and it makes it look like you're scattering your edits across the entire Idaho Panhandle. |
| 2 | 2020-09-15 15:56 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | I attached the area boundaries to the pipeline because that is where their property line sat on, though I will be more careful and I'll try to place the corner points right next to the pipeline(s) instead of attaching | |
| 3 | 2020-09-15 21:11 | Carnildo | Running the boundary up to the pipeline is fine, but you should only attach things to each other if they're actually attached. For example, landuse to landuse is fine, as is connecting two buildings that share a common wall. Connecting unrelated things such as a building and a neighboring for... | |
| 90889886 by deven_smith_ @ 2020-09-15 01:02 | 1 | 2020-09-15 08:37 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted Schreiber Road? It sure looks like it exists in the aerial imagery. |
| 2 | 2020-09-15 15:51 | deven_smith_ ♦23 | It does exist, however I believe it's all private driveway because the gates that have been added on the highway side. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-15 17:57 | Carnildo | If a road is private and gated, the correct way to map it is to add the gate, and mark both the gate and the road as having "private" access rights.OpenStreetMap isn't just used by the general public. It's frequently used by wildland firefighters because it tends to be more ... | |
| 90872928 by Howpper @ 2020-09-14 14:58 | 1 | 2020-09-15 03:12 | Carnildo | Why did you classify Wawawai Road as "secondary"? It doesn't connect anywhere significant to anywhere significant, and sees very little traffic. |
| 2 | 2020-09-16 12:15 | Howpper ♦121 | Fair point I was going purely by functional class without taking into account traffic. I'll change it back. | |
| 90370253 by vogelfreier @ 2020-09-03 15:28 | 1 | 2020-09-04 09:14 | Carnildo | You made two major mistakes here: you re-classified something that's barely more than a track as a tertiary road, and you re-tagged an old track as a waterway.In the time I've been following your MapRoulette activities, you've been making at least one mistake for every three chang... |
| 2 | 2020-09-04 17:17 | vogelfreier ♦91 | I have already covered many thousands of kilometers on foot and bicycle on country roads and forest and field roads here in my area and have partly brought it into OSM.But you in the USA seem to see things a little differently. Just because these roads have some kind of name on them and serve as a... | |
| 90318838 by brownbray @ 2020-09-02 18:30 | 1 | 2020-09-03 06:51 | Carnildo | There are better ways to move a building than deleting it and re-drawing it. You can right-click on it and select "move", or you can click on it and drag the corners around as needed. |
| 90263764 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-09-01 20:24 | 1 | 2020-09-02 07:44 | Carnildo | Could you *please* stop deleting information, like you did when you re-aligned the Cambium Place apartments? |
| 90083818 by vogelfreier @ 2020-08-28 13:08 | 1 | 2020-08-29 21:07 | Carnildo | When you were deciding to re-classify Clark Lake Road as tertiary, did you somehow miss that only about half of it actually existed? |
| 2 | 2020-09-04 15:29 | vogelfreier ♦91 | I can no longer reproduce that.As there are many different aerial photographs available and I only want to work with a few, and I don't want to download too much data, as in this case with Maproulette, because I don't know if the next task is right next to it and someone is working on it... | |
| 89833711 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-08-24 05:51 | 1 | 2020-08-25 08:13 | Carnildo | The "junction=roundabout" tag belongs on the circular part of the roundabout, not the point where other roads intersect the circle. |
| 89794874 by NudeTrotsky @ 2020-08-22 23:00 | 1 | 2020-08-23 06:28 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you duplicated the Hungry Horse Dam? |
| 2 | 2020-08-23 06:39 | NudeTrotsky ♦1 | No, if I duplicated it I most likely made an error. | |
| 89752196 by vogelfreier @ 2020-08-21 14:49 | 1 | 2020-08-22 07:45 | Carnildo | Not every dirt road in the world is a track. If it's long, well-maintained, and has a name, that's a good sign that it's something more significant. |
| 89718412 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-08-21 03:34 | 1 | 2020-08-21 09:44 | Carnildo | Has Clark Fork Storage closed? |
| 89711137 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-08-20 20:41 | 1 | 2020-08-21 07:30 | Carnildo | When you're creating a roundabout, please be careful not to create "short circuits", where an approach road connects directly to an exit road. It causes routing software to ignore the roundabout and give incorrect directions. |
| 89706739 by Howpper @ 2020-08-20 18:20 | 1 | 2020-08-21 07:28 | Carnildo | Where are you getting these names from? As of this evening, there were no signs indicating that the street was named "Crescent Avenue", or that either of the footways had names. |
| 2 | 2020-08-21 11:15 | Howpper ♦121 | As for the road names, I got them from the City of Spokane map (https://maps.spokanecity.org/#). As for the footpath, it runs along the right-of-way of North Center Street. | |
| 89478197 by Omnific @ 2020-08-16 17:07 | 1 | 2020-08-18 05:40 | Carnildo | You appear to have duplicated several buildings such as the East Central Community Center, the East Size Library, and a CenturyLink office. Is this an import from somewhere? |
| 2 | 2020-08-18 15:14 | Omnific ♦202 | Whoops, drew over imagery without downloading data without realizing it. One of those days. I'll be fixing. | |
| 89432784 by brownbray @ 2020-08-14 23:46 | 1 | 2020-08-18 04:46 | Carnildo | Please don't attach non-building things to buildings like you did here. If we get better imagery in the future and need to re-align the building, it makes things difficult. |
| 88636502 by Howpper @ 2020-07-28 18:35 | 1 | 2020-07-29 06:12 | Carnildo | I suppose this means I need to drive past there, again, and observe that it looks an awful lot like a driveway, again? |
| 88535312 by aneleutheroi @ 2020-07-27 00:50 | 1 | 2020-07-28 05:58 | Carnildo | Are you sure that's a building? It looks like a travel trailer to me. |
| 2 | 2020-07-28 06:02 | aneleutheroi ♦2 | About 85% sure. Camped out at Sage Lake in June, seen a solid building in that direction. Could have been just a trailer at the time the satellite picture was taken though, but there's a building there somewhere now. | |
| 88499598 by Caffè Filtrino @ 2020-07-25 15:54 | 1 | 2020-07-26 07:05 | Carnildo | 1) Are you planning to restore the section of railroad you deleted here?2) Is there a reason why you deleted a section of pipeline in Canada? |
| 2 | 2020-07-26 08:02 | Caffè Filtrino ♦1 | Sorry for being so slow: It's now all back, traced better than before https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88513519 | |
| 88480705 by Evilscaught @ 2020-07-25 00:32 | 1 | 2020-07-26 05:34 | Carnildo | You added the address of "916 Toole Avenue" to two houses. Was this a mistake? |
| 2 | 2020-07-26 06:36 | Evilscaught ♦5 | That was a mistake. Thank you for pointing that out. :) | |
| 88281194 by Adam Schneider @ 2020-07-21 07:19 | 1 | 2020-07-22 08:07 | Carnildo | Are you sure all of these are adits? A mine with a name of "pit", if it's not an open-pit mine, is usually an exploration pit or mineshaft (either of which should be tagged "man_made=mineshaft"). One with "placer" in the name is almost certainly a placer mine (ht... |
| 2 | 2020-07-23 04:50 | Adam Schneider ♦56 | I admit it's not a perfect solution, and I'll try to correct some of them based on their names if they contain "Pit" or "Quarry," etc.But I'm willing to bet that having all of them tagged as "adit" means far fewer mistakes than when they were all &quo... | |
| 3 | 2020-07-23 17:56 | Adam Schneider ♦56 | OK, I reverted a bunch of them. In reality, of course, most of these mines should be removed or at least marked as "disused," but that would require specific local knowledge. | |
| 88174218 by Hobgoblin @ 2020-07-18 11:37 | 1 | 2020-07-19 08:07 | Carnildo | The road here really is named "North Road", and it really does have the directional prefix "North". I've reverted your re-naming. |
| 88120082 by BrynTaelar15 @ 2020-07-17 05:41 | 1 | 2020-07-19 04:58 | Carnildo | Did you forget to change the business type of "Dominos", or is it really a laundromat sharing a name with the pizza chain? |
| 2 | 2020-07-19 05:37 | BrynTaelar15 ♦1 | Meant to change business type too. I apologize. | |
| 88112383 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-07-17 02:39 | 1 | 2020-07-19 04:49 | Carnildo | Is level 8 really the correct level here? Neighborhoods (if they're administrative entities) are usually level 10. If they're not administrative, they're "place=neighborhood" rather than "boundary=administrative". |
| 2 | 2020-09-25 00:49 | ZeLonewolf ♦556 | Hey there- the city of Missoula currently has a broken boundary polygon. Might you be willing to take a crack at drawing it in? | |
| 87901733 by 25or6to4 @ 2020-07-13 06:16 | 1 | 2020-07-14 07:22 | Carnildo | Where did you get the name "Gravel Point Cemetery" from? USGS topo maps call it "Wayside Cemetery", the GNIS node you deleted called it "Wayside Cemetary", and county records say it's run by the "Wayside Cemetery Association". |
| 2 | 2020-07-14 07:35 | 25or6to4 ♦18 | Looks like it didn't copy the GNIS node correctly, and pasted the previous GNIS node I had copied. I just fixed it. | |
| 87798055 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-07-10 06:24 | 1 | 2020-07-12 01:54 | Carnildo | Are all the paths in the University of Montana really cycleways, and not sidewalks that permit bicycles? |
| 2 | 2020-07-12 02:02 | snarkyclarky ♦6 | They are technically foot & cycle paths yes. | |
| 87793948 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-07-10 05:02 | 1 | 2020-07-11 06:01 | Carnildo | When you're expanding things from nodes to areas like you did with the Blue Mountain Clinic, please remember to copy over information like the address and opening hours. |
| 87616865 by Fulcrum102 @ 2020-07-06 19:37 | 1 | 2020-07-07 06:32 | Carnildo | If you're not going to use meaningful changeset comments, could you at least use longer ones? A single comma is a bit tricky to click on in the history view. |
| 87572664 by DarkHeartOfTheWood @ 2020-07-06 03:30 | 1 | 2020-07-06 07:05 | Carnildo | Reverted in changeset 87582017 |
| 87571139 by DarkHeartOfTheWood @ 2020-07-06 02:29 | 1 | 2020-07-06 07:05 | Carnildo | Reverted in changeset 87582017 |
| 87570730 by DarkHeartOfTheWood @ 2020-07-06 02:12 | 1 | 2020-07-06 07:04 | Carnildo | Reverted in changeset 87582017 |
| 87570185 by DarkHeartOfTheWood @ 2020-07-06 01:42 | 1 | 2020-07-06 07:04 | Carnildo | Reverted in changeset 87582017 |
| 87569999 by DarkHeartOfTheWood @ 2020-07-06 01:29 | 1 | 2020-07-06 07:04 | Carnildo | Reverted in changeset 87582017 |
| 87569900 by DarkHeartOfTheWood @ 2020-07-06 01:21 | 1 | 2020-07-06 07:04 | Carnildo | Reverted in changeset 87582017 |
| 87565466 by DarkHeartOfTheWood @ 2020-07-05 20:09 | 1 | 2020-07-06 07:04 | Carnildo | Reverted in changeset 87582017 |
| 87565446 by DarkHeartOfTheWood @ 2020-07-05 20:08 | 1 | 2020-07-06 07:04 | Carnildo | Reverted in changeset 87582017 |
| 87565223 by DarkHeartOfTheWood @ 2020-07-05 19:58 | 1 | 2020-07-06 07:04 | Carnildo | Reverted in changeset 87582017 |
| 87228876 by DarkHeartOfTheWood @ 2020-06-27 15:12 | 1 | 2020-07-06 07:02 | Carnildo | National forests are not "landuse=forest" under *any* of the many competing definitions of that tag. I've reverted this changeset. |
| 87519916 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-07-03 23:51 | 1 | 2020-07-04 07:49 | Carnildo | Could you change how you go about expanding business nodes into building outlines? The way you're doing it right now, it loses information such as the address of the Shady Sprurce Hostel, or the fact that the Sinclair station sells diesel. |
| 87512973 by jkrogman47 @ 2020-07-03 17:17 | 1 | 2020-07-04 07:36 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you tagged a whole bunch of houses as offices, when they clearly aren't? |
| 87511219 by Omnific @ 2020-07-03 16:02 | 1 | 2020-07-04 06:00 | Carnildo | It looks like you used 'building:part=yes' on everything here. Was that an accident, or are you halfway through more-detailed mapping of them? |
| 2 | 2020-07-05 15:58 | Omnific ♦202 | Good call, that was the wrong tag. Thanks for changing it. | |
| 87253652 by madre_ZZZ @ 2020-06-28 15:36 | 1 | 2020-06-29 06:16 | Carnildo | Please don't re-tag ordinary sidewalks as bicycle paths. |
| 87239239 by madre_ZZZ @ 2020-06-28 01:55 | 1 | 2020-06-28 19:54 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!Adding "bicycle=designated" to a cycleway is redundant -- the "cycleway" tag itself means "a route designated for bicycle use". |
| 86927137 by TokyoJoe @ 2020-06-21 06:50 | 1 | 2020-06-25 08:45 | Carnildo | Please, *please* don't use roads as the edges of a landuse multipolygon. It's going to make it very difficult to modify either the roads or the landuse, and if a standard for mapping roads as areas is ever developed, it'll make it impossible to draw proper road areas. |
| 86733545 by actkin @ 2020-06-16 17:20 | 1 | 2020-06-17 00:46 | Carnildo | Welcome to OpenStreetMap!Did you know that you can quickly square up the corners of a building by hitting the "Q" key, or by right-clicking and selecting the "square" menu option? |
| 86348419 by brownbray @ 2020-06-08 10:22 | 1 | 2020-06-10 06:25 | Carnildo | "Living street" is pretty much a purely European concept. If you find yourself thinking of tagging something in the US as such, it's probably either a service road or a residential street. |
| 85908628 by MappingJunkie @ 2020-05-28 20:57 | 1 | 2020-05-30 06:04 | Carnildo | You've got some extremely long service roads here. Are you sure you've classified them correctly? |
| 2 | 2020-06-01 19:32 | MappingJunkie ♦10 | I drove this area a couple of weeks ago and found houses set back long distances from the road on large acreages. I classified them as service roads, as they are used to access buildings.Do you have any suggestions on a different way to tag these? I am trying to stay inline with OSM wiki defin... | |
| 3 | 2020-06-04 21:29 | Carnildo | My concern is things like Crooked Road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13834754) which appears to be a ten-mile-long Forest Service road, not a driveway. | |
| 4 | 2020-06-05 00:57 | MappingJunkie ♦10 | I must have missed that one.It looks like it was fixed in Changeset #86014803 | |
| 86069300 by snarkyclarky @ 2020-06-02 03:50 | 1 | 2020-06-03 07:12 | Carnildo | All imagery I can find shows US-12/US-93 as two lanes each way with a center turn lane, not a divided road. Has that changed? |
| 2 | 2020-06-03 18:35 | snarkyclarky ♦6 | No, it appears I was misusing the formatting of the road based on an inaccurate map. This change needs to be reverted. | |
| 85840628 by Mike Schaffer @ 2020-05-27 15:14 | 1 | 2020-05-28 08:53 | Carnildo | You've applied the "office" tag to a great many things that aren't offices. Is there a reason for that? |
| 50905658 by Greg_Rose @ 2017-08-07 05:59 | 1 | 2020-05-17 04:00 | Carnildo | Could you be a bit more careful when adding place names from USGS topo maps? "Tolido" isn't the name of an inhabited place, it's the name of a now-destroyed survey marker: https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/ds_mark.prl?PidBox=SV1197 |
| 2 | 2020-05-17 06:57 | Greg_Rose ♦175 | Didn't get that from a topo, and yes it at least used to be an inhabited place.As I recall, someone had deleted the old "Tolido" placename so I recreated it and merged it with a Salish placename that was right next to the survey marker. Yeah I shouldn't have merged them.Tolid... | |
| 3 | 2020-05-17 07:32 | Greg_Rose ♦175 | Apologies for the snark. After thinking about it, I'm sure I would have come to the same conclusion as you did, and assumed I was trying to map a survey marker as a place. | |
| 4 | 2020-05-17 07:50 | Carnildo | Hopefully you'll find fewer of my early crap map changes in the near future. I came across this while researching the 130+ named places in Spokane County. So far, I've been able to confirm the accuracy of just under half of them, and found clear errors in about a quarter.(And the &qu... | |
| 5 | 2020-05-17 19:04 | Greg_Rose ♦175 | Oh wow... that's too bad about Telido Station. I thought it was pretty cool that they were keeping a historic name going.That's not a very good ratio on the Spokane Co named places. Let me know if you want a hand with any of the railroad-related ones, since that's where a lot of m... | |
| 84961513 by Greg_Rose @ 2020-05-10 07:36 | 1 | 2020-05-12 05:49 | Carnildo | Has something changed in the past two years? The last time I visited the Folsom Farm site, the road leading there was still very much a dirt road. |
| 2 | 2020-05-12 06:50 | Greg_Rose ♦175 | I'll be honest - I meant to change it to unpaved. When I went there last Summer almost all of it was graveled, with an ungraveled bit in the middle. | |
| 3 | 2020-05-12 07:51 | Greg_Rose ♦175 | Thx for catching that - I fixed it. My notes from last summer are absolute crap. :( | |
| 4 | 2020-05-12 07:55 | Greg_Rose ♦175 | So please let me know if you see anything else I may have screwed up. | |
| 84742855 by Greg_Rose @ 2020-05-06 08:00 | 1 | 2020-05-08 06:47 | Carnildo | The vast majority of "hamlets" out in the middle of nowhere are former (or sometimes current) railway stops, and should be re-tagged as "locality", not "isolated dwelling". |
| 2 | 2020-05-08 19:37 | Greg_Rose ♦175 | Agreed that most of these "hamlets" are not, but if there are industrial or commercial buildings still present, it's more appropriate to not downgrade all the way to "locality". The "isolated dwelling" tag is not literal - imo it's more about placename signifi... | |
| 3 | 2020-05-09 02:33 | Carnildo | There are two major problems with using "isolated_dwelling".The first and more significant is that many of these names are no longer used to describe where people live. Someone might say they live by the Fishtrap exit off I-90, but they wouldn't say they live in Fishtrap. Many o... | |
| 4 | 2020-05-10 07:36 | Greg_Rose ♦175 | 1. Agreed, it's ridiculous that Tyler and Fishtrap should render the same - Fishtrap is not even remotely a hamlet. However, Fishtrap is a perfect example of what should be classed as an "isolated dwelling". It has its own freeway exit; it has a namesake lake, a namesake rec area, a r... | |
| 5 | 2020-05-10 20:49 | Carnildo | You're missing my point with #1. Yes, there's a label on the map that says "Fishtrap". There are a number of buildings near it. But there's no connection between the two: you'll be hard-pressed to find someone who would say "I live in Fishtrap" (or even &qu... | |
| 84786598 by TravGW @ 2020-05-06 22:02 | 1 | 2020-05-08 07:07 | Carnildo | The description tag may not be for advertising, but it is for describing the location. I see nothing promotional about the description of Montana Peterbilt. |
| 84574735 by bekah318 @ 2020-05-03 17:46 | 1 | 2020-05-06 08:32 | Carnildo | Could you take a second look at this? I'm pretty sure the drydocks and loading docks you've added aren't correctly tagged. |
| 84070597 by David-mcscotty @ 2020-04-24 16:13 | 1 | 2020-04-25 08:48 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you're creating duplicates of existing businesses rather than just adding the new information to the existing version? |
| 2 | 2020-04-25 18:47 | David-mcscotty ♦1 | No duplicates of businesses were created. Only added names and addresses of my neighboring businesses.My customers would like to find these businesses while they are in the neighborhood and I intend on printing a map for local distribution. Names and addresses were obtained from either the signs in ... | |
| 3 | 2020-04-25 19:26 | Carnildo | I've cleaned them up, but Perkins, Burger King, Snappys, Apex Automotive, Flathead Transmission, and City Brew Coffee were all mapped twice: once with the information on the building outline, and once with it on a point inside the building. | |
| 4 | 2020-04-25 21:33 | David-mcscotty ♦1 | The point was used, as provided, to make the text standout so it could be read when there is an ample amount of map in the viewer. Zooming in to read the building names makes the purpose of the map mute. If a .75 mile radius allowed the user to see the buildings - that would be great. However, as is... | |
| 5 | 2020-04-26 00:34 | Carnildo | The map display on openstreetmap.org is hardly the only place where OSM data shows up. In many of the other places, adding a business as both a point and an area is counterproductive:* In OsmAnd, each business will show up twice, and since they're so close together, they'll crowd each... | |
| 84078342 by tdionne @ 2020-04-24 19:26 | 1 | 2020-04-25 09:20 | Carnildo | Please don't use the "name" field to describe things, particularly in cases like this where the description is incorrect. |
| 83805941 by Carnildo @ 2020-04-20 08:01 | 1 | 2020-04-20 14:26 | Deane Kensok ♦5 | Thanks for restoring this tag. The tag was deleted inadvertently (and unknowingly) while I was adding features in another city called Beaumont. I'm not sure how the edit was made, but will try to figure that out. |
| 2 | 2020-04-20 17:31 | Viajero Perdido ♦243 | Uh, while on the subject... How does wee Beaumont qualify as a "city" by OSM standards? Remember, we map to OSM criteria, not political ones.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity"Largest settlement" is Edmonton, not Beaumont nor the other burbs. | |
| 3 | 2020-04-20 18:09 | Carnildo | I don't know. You'll have to ask Mesowhite, who was the one who originally made it a city: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65947260 | |
| 83783876 by Deane Kensok @ 2020-04-19 19:47 | 1 | 2020-04-20 08:02 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted the "place=city" tag from Beaumont, Alberta? |
| 2 | 2020-04-20 14:20 | Deane Kensok ♦5 | No, if I did, that was inadvertent. I was making some edits in Beaumont, California and found, Beaumont, Canada when I was searching for Beaumont, CA. I'm not sure how that tag got deleted, but will re-add that if it was not done already. Thanks for catching that. | |
| 83753909 by PBSpiralGamer @ 2020-04-18 19:35 | 1 | 2020-04-18 21:44 | mapman44 ♦526 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery |
| 2 | 2020-04-19 08:27 | Carnildo | Not all imagery is created equal. In the case of the Numerica bank, the only imagery new enough to show it when I added it was "DigitalGlobe Standard", the only redeeming feature of which is that it's generally quite recent -- it's also very blurry and poorly-aligned.Nowaday... | |
| 83496434 by John Hanover @ 2020-04-13 20:45 | 1 | 2020-04-13 21:39 | mapman44 ♦526 | Thanks for the edits but just keep in mind that the state line doesn't always follow the river exactly. Over time the course of the river may change but the state line stays the same. Just sayin' --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/change... |
| 2 | 2020-04-15 04:32 | Carnildo | The relationship between boundaries and rivers is an incredibly complicated area of law. In general, if the river shifts course gradually, the boundary follows the river; if it shifts course abruptly (eg. a flood causes it to settle into a new course), the boundary doesn't.The geography of... | |
| 3 | 2020-04-15 15:02 | John Hanover ♦16 | Thanks for your comment. I did check to make sure that my edits were consistent with USGS topographic maps before uploading. If you have any questions or comments about one of my edits please don't hesitate to send me a message or leave a comment.-John Hanover | |
| 83387758 by boopington @ 2020-04-11 04:53 | 1 | 2020-04-12 06:05 | Carnildo | I've partially reverted this changeset. Many of the razed: or demolished: features you deleted are still visible in recent imagery, and having them mapped as demolished discourages armchair mappers from re-adding them.I also restored one building you deleted that is visible in all availabl... |
| 83330539 by NWSH @ 2020-04-09 23:00 | 1 | 2020-04-11 05:43 | Carnildo | I've fixed the road here. |
| 83038401 by MichaelSprayberry @ 2020-04-03 14:09 | 1 | 2020-04-07 04:44 | Carnildo | The "Residential Road" tag is meant for roads running through residential areas, and for historic reasons, you'll also see it used as a generic "no particular road type" tag. Most of what you've added here should be using the "Driveway" tag. |
| 82950101 by rnolen @ 2020-04-02 02:27 | 1 | 2020-04-03 07:54 | Carnildo | You accidentally turned the entire Kalispel Golf Course into a sand trap here. I've changed it back, but please be more careful in the future. |
| 82495137 by NA7UR3 @ 2020-03-22 21:43 | 1 | 2020-03-23 21:05 | Carnildo | Thanks for the addition.When adding "floating" sidewalks like this, it's useful to connect the ends to the nearest street or driveway, even if there's no paved connection. This lets routing software know it's possible to move between the two. |
| 2 | 2020-03-24 00:47 | NA7UR3 ♦1 | Okay, thank you. I'm new to this and I appreciate you letting me know. | |
| 82385214 by Howpper @ 2020-03-19 10:08 | 1 | 2020-03-20 00:55 | Carnildo | When I drove along Fairview Avenue on the evening of May 11, 2017, it did not appear to be lit. Has that changed? |
| 82260690 by mapman44 @ 2020-03-16 13:52 | 1 | 2020-03-17 06:37 | Carnildo | Could you please do this in smaller chunks? It makes it easier to review and fix mistakes (and there are quite a few here, such as every bridge I've checked so far). |
| 2 | 2020-03-17 13:05 | mapman44 ♦526 | Will do. I understand there will be some bridges that will need to be fixed but they are much easier to find with validation than to trace the length of every stream just in case there are bridges. | |
| 3 | 2020-03-17 18:04 | Carnildo | The problem is that this changeset added a number of bridges in places where there aren't bridges. Of the twelve I've checked so far, eleven haven't actually been bridges. | |
| 4 | 2020-03-17 18:06 | mapman44 ♦526 | I will be happy to go back and fix them if you haven't done so already. | |
| 5 | 2020-03-17 18:56 | mapman44 ♦526 | I checked all the bridges in this changeset and they should be ok now. I'm not sure what happened with the errors but I appreciate your bringing them to my attention and thanks for fixing them. | |
| 82137134 by Natfoot @ 2020-03-13 02:50 | 1 | 2020-03-13 08:00 | Carnildo | Did you use the wrong signal preset here? |
| 2 | 2020-03-14 04:01 | Natfoot ♦56 | Could you be more specific. This area is CTC | |
| 3 | 2020-03-14 06:39 | Carnildo | You appear to have used the highway traffic signals preset for a railway signal at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7290148178 | |
| 4 | 2020-03-14 23:36 | Natfoot ♦56 | Thanks for catching that. | |
| 5 | 2020-03-14 23:37 | Natfoot ♦56 | It is fixed now. | |
| 80741709 by calaz @ 2020-02-09 05:16 | 1 | 2020-02-19 06:46 | compdude ♦169 | Please provide evidence that WA 166 is officially designated on this road. AFAIK, it doesn't extend beyond the eastern city limits of Port Orchard. |
| 2 | 2020-03-11 01:06 | Carnildo | I've removed the highway designation and reverted the roads back to "highway=secondary". | |
| 78611056 by calaz @ 2019-12-19 03:28 | 1 | 2020-02-05 06:00 | compdude ♦169 | Do you have any proof that this road is State Route 217? Given that you've added several other state routes to OSM and have had people question them, I feel like you just made this one up. |
| 2 | 2020-03-11 01:06 | Carnildo | I've removed the highway designation. | |
| 73987416 by calaz @ 2019-09-02 05:57 | 1 | 2020-02-07 06:30 | compdude ♦169 | Please provide some proof that WA 222 actually exists. |
| 2 | 2020-03-11 01:05 | Carnildo | I've removed the highway designation. | |
| 81085489 by Julie Paquette @ 2020-02-17 01:40 | 1 | 2020-02-17 06:41 | mapman44 ♦526 | Hello, Julie Paquette, and thanks for your edits. Could you please save edits in their local area rather than edits on opposite sides of the world in the same changeset? Thanks. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81085489 ... |
| 2 | 2020-02-18 22:33 | Carnildo | The user is editing using maps.me. As far as I know, the app gives no control over when or how much it uploads, so world-spanning bounding boxes are normal for it. | |
| 80912509 by Pippi Dissertation @ 2020-02-12 15:22 | 1 | 2020-02-12 15:26 | Pippi Dissertation ♦2 | Is this addition ok? I have named the reputable sources and the data is understandable to all. Let me know if this is not contributing appropriately to the OpenStreetMap. |
| 2 | 2020-02-12 17:29 | Allison P ♦1,136 | If a tag needs to have multiple values, they should be separated with semicolons rather than slashes. Since edifice_height is an undocumented tag, it would be helpful to create a page on the OSM wiki explaining what it means. While it would be incorrect to delete it, it would clear up confusion for ... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-13 06:00 | freebeer ♦1,598 | I'm a bit concerned about the admissibility of your source for OSM, as mentioned in the multiple comments to your earlier changeset, in that the best I could get from a search was an abstract describing the paper, and the feeling it was behind a paywall or something, but I wasn't motivated... | |
| 4 | 2020-02-14 19:54 | Carnildo | Is "edifice_height" the same thing as topographic prominence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topographic_prominence)? If so, there have been intermittent efforts to establish the tag "prominence" for that, and I recommend using it rather than something completely undocumented. | |
| 80926147 by Jessica12345 @ 2020-02-12 22:56 | 1 | 2020-02-13 07:44 | Carnildo | Looks good to me. The building was mapped back in 2008, and even the oldest imagery shows a parking lot. I'd say it was demolished a long time ago. |
| 2 | 2020-02-13 19:20 | Jessica12345 ♦15 | Thanks! I'm not sure I'm even able to get to that location without a good reason to check. | |
| 80920413 by LucasLarson @ 2020-02-12 19:08 | 1 | 2020-02-13 06:01 | Carnildo | You've changed part of the Missoula border (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34746177) into an improbable-looking shape. Was this intentional? |
| 80769565 by Tubbybtch @ 2020-02-10 02:23 | 1 | 2020-02-11 07:09 | Carnildo | Please don't add nonsense to the map, even if you find the local traffic engineers' obsession with roundabouts annoying. |
| 80813175 by Pippi Dissertation @ 2020-02-10 19:57 | 1 | 2020-02-10 20:29 | Carnildo | Is this an import from somewhere? Most if not all of the volcanoes you've added here duplicate existing ones. |
| 2 | 2020-02-10 23:00 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Not just that, they have the wrong elevation too. | |
| 3 | 2020-02-11 01:22 | JesseBogart02 ♦1 | Guys she tried her hardest. Be nice to Pippi >:( | |
| 4 | 2020-02-11 05:24 | kartonage ♦987 | Reverted.Please check if objects are already existing before an import. For imports in general, please see the import guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) and also make sure to let everyone know the source of your data. Naturally the data should also be correct to s... | |
| 5 | 2020-02-11 16:57 | Pippi Dissertation ♦2 | Hi all,I am working on OpenStreetMap for my masters dissertation. Please do not delete my tags without notifying me first. I would appreciate time to change the issues or at least download my data. The OpenStreetMap guidelines say “Don’t remove tags you don’t understand”. I... | |
| 6 | 2020-02-11 21:39 | Allison P ♦1,136 | One feature, one OSM element applies here.You can edit other people's tags and delete them (OSM is a collaborative project after all), but don't delete them just because you don't understand them.If you are testing, do not upload your data to OpenStreetMap. I recommend using J... | |
| 7 | 2020-02-12 08:53 | kartonage ♦987 | OpenStreetMap is not the place to dump data into which you personally need for some project. You can work that data all on your own outside of the project (with QGIS or you can try to find a way to work with the data at hand. Creating duplicate data deteriorates the overall quality of the project, c... | |
| 80557343 by John Hanover @ 2020-02-04 23:12 | 1 | 2020-02-07 20:15 | Carnildo | You can mark a trail as "unofficial" by adding the "informal=yes" tag to it. It's not one of the tags that the iD editor provides by default, so you'll need to add it manually:1. Select the trail in the editor2. In the panel on the left, scroll down to the "... |
| 80419901 by Reeniz @ 2020-02-01 19:52 | 1 | 2020-02-02 07:20 | Carnildo | Where are you importing these buildings from? |
| 80323672 by Kla_Ger @ 2020-01-30 15:08 | 1 | 2020-01-31 06:23 | Carnildo | You've added a service road with the type "Kallispell Access Lane". Was this supposed to be a name? |
| 2 | 2020-01-31 11:21 | Kla_Ger ♦3 | Yes - however after re-check I found that I mistook the spelling from Tiger. Changed now | |
| 80120678 by abenthagen @ 2020-01-27 05:57 | 1 | 2020-01-28 08:04 | Carnildo | The usual way to tag this sort of business is as a "Cafe" with a cuisine of "coffee shop". |
| 80115743 by abenthagen @ 2020-01-27 03:35 | 1 | 2020-01-28 07:51 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for adding businesses to the map!Something to keep in mind when you're editing: when you add a tag to something, the editing software sometimes automatically applies additional related tags. For example, when you added the "Storage rental" tag to Skyvie... |
| 79925095 by John Hanover @ 2020-01-22 15:17 | 1 | 2020-01-24 07:33 | Carnildo | Thanks for your additions.Elevations in OpenStreetMap are specified in meters. By giving High Camp an elevation of "6123", you're making it one of the highest points in North America. I've fixed it, but it's one of those "gotchas" need to keep in mind when ad... |
| 79820692 by Allison P @ 2020-01-20 23:24 | 1 | 2020-01-22 18:40 | Carnildo | "isolated_dwelling" is almost never the correct tag for places in the United States. If you think you've found one while cleaning up GNIS, it's probably either a former town, a former railway stop, or you need to look around to find the rest of the hamlet. |
| 2 | 2020-01-22 19:10 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Thanks for the info! I used isolated_dwelling for places with only one or two households (farmhouses mostly) even if they previously had a larger population. If this isn't correct, let me know and I'll go back and retag them as hamlets. | |
| 79324149 by ManiacalLoon @ 2020-01-08 06:05 | 1 | 2020-01-09 07:03 | Carnildo | Please don't glue unrelated objects to roads like you did with Town Square Park here. It makes it difficult to modify the roads later, such as when splitting one to add lane information or speed-limit changes. |
| 79179386 by Natfoot @ 2020-01-04 02:32 | 1 | 2020-01-05 20:48 | Carnildo | A cycleway that's also an intermittent stream? Is this a tagging mistake on your part, or a design mistake on someone else's? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634162906 |
| 2 | 2020-01-05 20:59 | Natfoot ♦56 | If you have stream/water that floods the passageway intermittently how would you tag it? I know multiple places where this is true. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-06 05:48 | Carnildo | If it's got a well-defined flow direction, then "intermittent stream" seems reasonable; if it's just a low spot that collects water, then I don't know how I'd tag it. | |
| 79122460 by Tubbybtch @ 2020-01-02 16:51 | 1 | 2020-01-05 07:21 | Carnildo | You added two houses both numbered "4612 West Elderberry Avenue". Was that a mistake? |
| 78998794 by Natfoot @ 2019-12-30 04:42 | 1 | 2020-01-02 01:50 | Carnildo | Cheney? I think your aim's a bit off. |
| 78834464 by Marshall Carter @ 2019-12-25 01:44 | 1 | 2019-12-31 17:09 | Carnildo | Thanks for the addition.It's better to put address points on the actual building than on the street: this way, more sophisticated routers can do things like say "your destination is on the right", or find a walking route that involves fewer street crossings.It's easy to d... |
| 78698720 by Glassman @ 2019-12-20 20:45 | 1 | 2019-12-31 06:33 | Carnildo | The Wikidata item you linked to is about the tribe, not the reservation. |
| 2 | 2020-01-01 00:52 | Glassman ♦5,217 | Wikipedia doesn't have a article on the reservation. Both the one I picked or "Spokane People" refer to the reservation. I just picked one. Feel free to change it if you thing "Spokane People" is a better choice. I have reached out to a friend that works for a nearby tri... | |
| 78611675 by calaz @ 2019-12-19 03:42 | 1 | 2019-12-20 08:21 | Carnildo | When was that designated WA-907? The state Department of Transportation doesn't seem to know anything about it. |
| 2 | 2020-02-19 06:41 | compdude ♦169 | I'm going to remove the ref tags, as you've provided no evidence that WA 907 exists. | |
| 78494535 by Arctic gnome @ 2019-12-16 22:59 | 1 | 2019-12-18 09:49 | Carnildo | Why did you delete the Mountain Standard Time zone? |
| 2 | 2020-03-18 17:08 | Arctic gnome ♦27 | I differentiated between places on mountain time in the America/Edmonton zone and other zones on mountain time. | |
| 78492161 by Carnildo @ 2019-12-16 21:14 | 1 | 2019-12-16 21:20 | crossdiver ♦1 | Thank you. Also, I can't seem to get that one island to render on all zoom levels?! Gah. |
| 2 | 2019-12-17 05:33 | Carnildo | The map isn't updated at all zoom levels at the same time. The higher zoom levels usually sync up in an hour or two, a couple days at most, while the lower zoom levels can take longer (when I was mapping some farmland around Spokane, it took nearly three months for it to show up at the "a... | |
| 3 | 2019-12-19 13:28 | freebeer ♦1,598 | islands can also be a special case, for multiple reasons. there was an area i watched for days or weeks until i forgot about it, in hopes the invisible islands would appear.some months later i was reminded to revisit that area to see that at last the islands were rendering, with no changes sinc... | |
| 78315490 by Timothy Whidden @ 2019-12-12 11:55 | 1 | 2019-12-13 07:20 | Carnildo | "amenity=school" doesn't seem right for something that isn't actually an educational institution. "landuse=governmental", perhaps? |
| 78172053 by Morgan Lombardi @ 2019-12-09 21:42 | 1 | 2019-12-10 09:44 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you changed I-90 Business from a route to an administrative boundary? |
| 78121991 by Sam1221 @ 2019-12-09 00:46 | 1 | 2019-12-10 07:47 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!The common practice when mapping schools is to put the name only on the school grounds, and leave the school building unnamed unless it has a name distinct from that of the school as a whole. |
| 77977307 by matthews028 @ 2019-12-05 07:54 | 1 | 2019-12-06 09:05 | Carnildo | Did you intend to turn a couple stretches of George Washington Way into barriers? |
| 77957320 by TrentFeistner @ 2019-12-04 19:11 | 1 | 2019-12-05 08:19 | habi ♦1,840 | Please don't make changesets spanning nearly the whole globe. This makes reviewing them (as your requested) very cumbersome. |
| 2 | 2019-12-06 08:48 | Carnildo | "Living street" is pretty much a purely European concept. If you find something elsewhere that looks like a living street, it's probably a driveway or an ordinary residential road. | |
| 3 | 2019-12-09 04:07 | skquinn ♦803 | Also, the comment of "fun" does absolutely nothing to describe the edits you've made. | |
| 77955737 by clay_c @ 2019-12-04 18:21 | 1 | 2019-12-06 08:28 | Carnildo | Is this really a worthwhile thing to do? Sure, it's typographically better, but nobody's got an en-dash on their keyboard. Someone searching for "Croton-Harmon", for example, had better hope that the search engine understands that all short horizontal lines are equivalent. |
| 2 | 2019-12-06 22:11 | clay_c ♦489 | Searching for "croton-harmon" and "croton harmon" with Nominatim yields the railway station and nearby details. Looks to me like the search engine recognizes it as a word boundary. It's a punctuation character according to Unicode so that's more or less what I'd ex... | |
| 3 | 2019-12-20 20:43 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Just to confirm, this does break search. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=Croton-Harmon#values does not find the value amended below.OSM tries to proceed on the "principle of least surprise", and having hyphens in names where there actually is a hyphen in the name sounds lik... | |
| 4 | 2019-12-20 21:36 | clay_c ♦489 | As far as I can tell, both Amtrak and Metro-North variably use hyphens and en-dashes in the name of Croton–Harmon station (among others). The designer in me thinks the en-dash is preferable for hyphenated station names, and the grumpy software engineer in me wants to submit issue tickets to th... | |
| 5 | 2019-12-21 11:45 | maxerickson ♦234 | Taginfo is a tool for data inspection and it shows you what you ask for https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=Croton%E2%80%93Harmon#valuesIt could plausibly be extended to show "extended results", perhaps just a second list called "similar results"What I wonder is wh... | |
| 6 | 2019-12-21 12:03 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | In OSM we don't generally use the "house style" of shops etc. - we use the commonly accepted name. See for example https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=toys#values and https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Pam for the former "Toys R Us" - people don't typically use some wa... | |
| 7 | 2019-12-21 12:37 | maxerickson ♦234 | The "house style" for Toys“R”Us in text is Toys“R”Us.Anyway, my point was that a prescriptive house style (or rather, an official dictionary of station names) is more or less the only way to argue that the official names use en-dash, because we can't trust ... | |
| 8 | 2019-12-21 23:09 | clay_c ♦489 | reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78723287 | |
| 9 | 2019-12-21 23:13 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Thanks | |
| 10 | 2020-01-05 21:47 | Minh Nguyen ♦562 | For what it’s worth, I also use en dashes in situations where a name would properly include an en dash in running text. It doesn’t particularly matter whether the sign or the agency’s house style applies proper punctuation. Longer dashes and curly quotes are usually excluded from s... | |
| 77647426 by Aspadistra at Ashdown Forest @ 2019-11-27 17:47 | 1 | 2019-11-28 06:36 | Carnildo | Is this really a stretch of one-way service road? It doesn't look like it in aerial imagery. |
| 2 | 2019-12-03 17:10 | Aspadistra at Ashdown Forest ♦1 | Probably a typo in the setting up of the descriptor infos ...Still trying to figure out how to also use Mercator Linux App to also see edits ongoing ... | |
| 77021924 by swimdb @ 2019-11-13 15:27 | 1 | 2019-11-19 05:51 | Carnildo | Wouldn't that be a not-a-building? |
| 2 | 2019-11-19 10:13 | swimdb ♦25 | Yes it would indeed, and important to tag drive-ins as such. I have a fixed a few where the drive-in was tagged as a building. I am super lazy with my comments. | |
| 76858623 by freyaavion @ 2019-11-10 02:35 | 1 | 2019-11-17 07:42 | Carnildo | Whose park is that? It's not one of the ones on the city's list. |
| 76855991 by freyaavion @ 2019-11-09 22:31 | 1 | 2019-11-17 05:36 | Carnildo | The "pedestrian access" question is about whether it's *legal* for pedestrians to use the road, not if it's safe. If there isn't a "no pedestrians" sign, pedestrian access is legal. |
| 76853471 by Smart Summon Cartographer @ 2019-11-09 20:17 | 1 | 2019-11-09 23:22 | Glassman ♦5,217 | The fixme for the charger station is good, but because we don't have a tag for under construction it will appear as live. We do tag buildings and highways under construction using highway=construction + highway=residential as an example. The renders will display the road as under construction. ... |
| 2 | 2019-11-17 04:07 | Carnildo | I'd go with a "lifecycle prefix" of "construction:". I'm not aware of any maps that will draw it, but QA tools should flag it for updating after a while. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix | |
| 76834096 by MissingCSAA @ 2019-11-09 00:27 | 1 | 2019-11-17 03:49 | Carnildo | I'm not seeing anything in the area that I'd call "scree", even away from the fields. |
| 2 | 2019-11-17 05:01 | MissingCSAA ♦51 | Perhaps shingle then? The soil in this particular area is exclusively rock, thus its small AVA status. | |
| 76537703 by mikek1 @ 2019-11-02 20:55 | 1 | 2019-11-04 09:06 | Carnildo | Looks pretty good.I see one mistake: your crosswalks are all free-floating, not connected to the rest of the road network. This means that drivers won't get alerted to the crosswalks.This is easy to fix in iD (the in-browser editor that you're using). Simply click on one of the c... |
| 76535168 by LittlePebble @ 2019-11-02 18:52 | 1 | 2019-11-04 08:25 | Carnildo | For mapping large objects like the forest you're working on, I recommend using the JOSM editor (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/). |
| 73638236 by Harley Conerly @ 2019-08-22 18:38 | 1 | 2019-11-03 20:18 | Carnildo | It looks like you removed the "highway" tagging from a section of MT-287 in this edit. Is there a reason for that? |
| 76231795 by Mollyruthj @ 2019-10-25 23:59 | 1 | 2019-10-27 06:49 | Carnildo | If you're not going to use changeset comments, could you at least be a little more verbose about not using them? A single dot is rather hard to click on in the list of changes. |
| 76235605 by hasaan22 @ 2019-10-26 07:10 | 1 | 2019-10-27 05:58 | Carnildo | Whatever you're doing that's resurrecting long-deleted nodes, stop it. |
| 2 | 2019-10-28 08:52 | hasaan22 ♦19 | Sure, I'm so sorry. | |
| 76230753 by hazelwillow @ 2019-10-25 22:37 | 1 | 2019-10-27 05:46 | Carnildo | Are you sure you put Ron's Food Mart in the correct place? In the aerial imagery, the building you mapped looks like a gas station, with the convenience store being in the next building to the west. |
| 76216736 by swimdb @ 2019-10-25 15:12 | 1 | 2019-10-27 04:13 | Carnildo | Is the Kenworthy Theatre a cinema? It was already added earlier this year as a theater. |
| 2 | 2019-10-27 11:33 | swimdb ♦25 | This link seems to indicate it primarily functions as a cinema http://www.kenworthy.org/calendar/It also seems to have live performances. I am not sure how best to express the two amenity functions. if you have an idea on that I would love to have the help. This is a problem for a... | |
| 76129109 by AllanOk @ 2019-10-24 02:02 | 1 | 2019-10-24 07:55 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted an elevator in Seattle? |
| 76004390 by swimdb @ 2019-10-21 14:52 | 1 | 2019-10-22 09:06 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you split the cinema off into its own building? Aerial imagery doesn't show any sign of separation between it and the rest of the mall. |
| 2 | 2019-10-22 11:24 | swimdb ♦25 | Thanks got catching that, I had made the split at the wrong place. The mall plans show it where it is now ( I just edited again). I try to separate spaces with different semantic activity and purpose where possible. It is not always possible. Linear mini-malls like this one often are poss... | |
| 75717741 by A-damW @ 2019-10-15 12:01 | 1 | 2019-10-16 05:37 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!You might want to set the "smoothness" tag for Lolo Creek Road as an additional hint about what sorts of vehicles it's suitable for. I see what looks like a couple of pickup trucks driving on it in aerial imagery, so I'd guess that the smoothness would be cons... |
| 75641580 by Howpper @ 2019-10-14 05:16 | 1 | 2019-10-15 05:33 | Carnildo | I've reverted this. State boundaries are never defined in terms of roads, so tying them together makes it likely that important things will break badly if State Avenue is ever changed. |
| 75633936 by Carnildo @ 2019-10-13 20:18 | 1 | 2019-10-14 04:14 | Howpper ♦121 | This county map shows camp Caro as that entire area: https://www.spokanecounty.org/DocumentCenter/View/4057/Dishman-Hills-Natural-Area-Trail-Map-PDF?bidId= |
| 2 | 2019-10-14 18:07 | Carnildo | But nothing on the ground does. The sign out by Appleway says "Dishman Hills Natural Area", and the maps at trail junctions show only the developed area as "Camp Caro". | |
| 75601779 by Howpper @ 2019-10-12 14:15 | 1 | 2019-10-14 00:24 | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset. The land on the west side of the road may be owned by the county, but on the east side, there are signs saying "Leaving Natural Area" as you approach the road. |
| 75600218 by Howpper @ 2019-10-12 12:59 | 1 | 2019-10-13 20:05 | Carnildo | As far as I can tell, names like "WA 2", "WA 90", or "WA 395" exist only because the Washington Department of Transportation is responsible for maintaining I-90, US-2, and US-395. Nobody ever actually uses those names. |
| 2 | 2019-10-14 04:13 | Howpper ♦121 | I am aware nobody uses those names, but they are still officially designated as state routes (which is why I tagged them as unsigned). Here is the law that defines Washington State Route 2 if you are interested: https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=47.17.005 | |
| 75603084 by Howpper @ 2019-10-12 15:16 | 1 | 2019-10-13 19:54 | Carnildo | I'm going to revert this edit. Camp Caro, as actually used, refers to the developed area bordered more or less by the fences on the north, and Camp Caro Loop on the south, not the union of parcels 45191.9092 and 45191.9188. |
| 75582130 by Spanky357 @ 2019-10-11 18:51 | 1 | 2019-10-13 00:01 | Carnildo | I can't find any evidence that "RSP Rec Area" is a park. Ground-level and aerial imagery just shows an empty patch of brush, and it's not on the city's list of parks. |
| 75401410 by JessAk71 @ 2019-10-08 06:55 | 1 | 2019-10-09 07:55 | Carnildo | The preferred tag for a previous name is "old_name". I'm not aware of anything that uses the "former_name" tag. |
| 2 | 2019-10-09 14:28 | JessAk71 ♦116 | thanks Carnildo, I just fixed it. You are right my brain misfired on that one. | |
| 75252517 by Rick Rupp @ 2019-10-03 20:47 | 1 | 2019-10-06 09:04 | Carnildo | You appear to have moved a section of Martin Stadium a few hundred yards north. Was this intentional? |
| 2 | 2019-10-06 17:51 | Rick Rupp ♦7 | No. That was inadvertent. The only edit I intended was removing NE Fairway Lane. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-07 21:59 | Rick Rupp ♦7 | I reverted the unintended change to Martin Stadium. | |
| 75209932 by Howpper @ 2019-10-03 04:44 | 1 | 2019-10-06 04:15 | Carnildo | You appear to have broken the Post Falls city limits with this edit: there's an unclosed loop to the northwest of Poleline and Chase. |
| 75050120 by Howpper @ 2019-09-28 22:34 | 1 | 2019-10-01 02:11 | Carnildo | Are you sure it's a military site? I'll have to check my pictures from when I surveyed it, but I don't recall seeing any military-related warning signs, only FAA-related ones (and I'm certain I didn't see any outside the fenced area). |
| 2 | 2019-10-01 13:09 | Howpper ♦121 | I thought since it was part of the NORAD system it counted as a military site. I guess if it's only directly operated by the FAA, then it wouldn't count as a military site. I'll change it. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-01 18:19 | Carnildo | The Mica Peak radar was handed over to the FAA in the late 1970s. The military still gets a copy of the radar data, but operation is strictly civilian. | |
| 75054469 by Howpper @ 2019-09-29 07:14 | 1 | 2019-10-01 02:12 | Carnildo | Are you sure it's a military area? I don't recall seeing any military-related warning signs when I surveyed the area, only FAA-related ones. (And I'm certain I didn't see any warning signs outside the fenced area.) |
| 74775535 by DJ Cane @ 2019-09-22 16:02 | 1 | 2019-09-23 07:56 | Carnildo | The farmland you added doesn't look very farm-like to me, it looks like someone's back yard. Are you sure you tagged it correctly? |
| 2 | 2019-09-23 13:31 | DJ Cane ♦3 | I marked this as farmland because that piece of land (along with some others on residential properties) are primarily used as pasture for a small number of cows. When this part of Kennewick was annexed, a few families had farm animals and those who did were allowed to continue using their proper... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-23 18:21 | Carnildo | Might want to add a "note=" tag to that effect -- cows don't show up too well in aerial imagery. | |
| 4 | 2019-09-24 06:35 | freebeer ♦1,598 | actually, cows show up great. i want to point you at a particular imagery where you could count the flies accompanying them, but i've searched in vain with the realisation the overflights were made at the end of winter when the meadows were barren and the cows were still in the barn. i'l... | |
| 74762661 by ToteTax @ 2019-09-22 03:49 | 1 | 2019-09-22 05:23 | Carnildo | Thanks for the addition!Are you sure the outline covers the entire park? Aerial imagery shows a couple of features to the west that look like they might be part of a playground. |
| 2 | 2019-09-22 05:40 | ToteTax ♦1 | It isn't the full park. All of it is the park. I can try to make it the full park which goes across the road and down the canal across another road. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-23 08:03 | Carnildo | A more accurate map is always the preferred option. | |
| 74758074 by Jessica12345 @ 2019-09-21 19:53 | 1 | 2019-09-22 07:59 | Carnildo | Did you forget to change the name? |
| 2 | 2019-09-22 16:17 | Jessica12345 ♦15 | I think Vespucci bugged out on me, because I distinctly remember changing both the Name and the Brand. I'll fix this when I have access to a computer again, thanks for catching it. | |
| 74759489 by TWiGs ADV @ 2019-09-21 21:11 | 1 | 2019-09-22 07:15 | Carnildo | "Unmaintained track road" is meant for things like logging roads, not unpaved driveways. |
| 74685191 by Fitted @ 2019-09-19 16:52 | 1 | 2019-09-20 08:57 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!Since you requested a review, here are the things I noticed:* First and foremost, your changes are scattered across most of the Americas. This makes it difficult to review, and causes them to show up in the change history for many people. Make sure you save your changes ever... |
| 74615380 by skoocoom @ 2019-09-18 09:41 | 1 | 2019-09-18 20:48 | Carnildo | Would "leisure=fishing" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=fishing) be a reasonable tag for this? |
| 74501971 by mircozorzo @ 2019-09-15 17:30 | 1 | 2019-09-16 06:31 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted surface information from 52 roads here? |
| 2 | 2019-09-16 10:38 | literan ♦6,687 | ... leaving before added highway=unclassified on nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6302269814 and more and more | |
| 3 | 2019-09-17 19:52 | mircozorzo ♦22 | No at all, it's an error. | |
| 4 | 2019-09-21 07:21 | skquinn ♦803 | Please comment your changesets with a summary of what you did going forward, so other mappers may better understand your edits. | |
| 5 | 2019-09-22 06:49 | mircozorzo ♦22 | Ok, thanks | |
| 74339270 by Howpper @ 2019-09-11 07:29 | 1 | 2019-09-12 07:53 | Carnildo | As far as I can tell, it's best described as "a weird historical accident". Back in 1888, one developer platted it as an extension of Oak Street, another platted it as an extension of Ash Street, and it never got built. But because the right-of-way provides the only access to a parc... |
| 74331421 by Howpper @ 2019-09-10 23:16 | 1 | 2019-09-11 06:39 | Carnildo | The "rest of the reservation" you added isn't part of the reservation, it's off-reservation trust land (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-reservation_trust_land), which is a very different thing. |
| 2 | 2019-09-11 07:33 | Howpper ♦121 | Thank you for informing me. I probably should have looked more into it before adding it. | |
| 74318288 by Howpper @ 2019-09-10 15:35 | 1 | 2019-09-11 05:24 | Carnildo | The pavement on these streets is brick. I went there and looked. |
| 74277814 by Jessica12345 @ 2019-09-09 18:46 | 1 | 2019-09-10 07:29 | Carnildo | Is "maxspeed:forward" really the correct tag here? Roads where the speed limit varies with direction are quite rare. |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 15:14 | Jessica12345 ♦15 | Apparently I misunderstood how Vespucci assigns values. This has been corrected in change set #74317252 | |
| 74232571 by cowdog @ 2019-09-08 17:34 | 1 | 2019-09-09 09:14 | Carnildo | Is the speed limit on WA-261 really 35 mph for the whole distance you've tagged? |
| 2 | 2019-09-11 01:09 | cowdog ♦12 | Correct you are. I forgot to split the way. It's fixed now. | |
| 74198257 by hasaan22 @ 2019-09-07 05:44 | 1 | 2019-09-07 09:01 | ClarkstonCorrect ♦62 | what |
| 2 | 2019-09-07 09:17 | hasaan22 ♦19 | nothing. I made a mistake. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-08 03:07 | Carnildo | You've been making these mistakes every few days for quite a while. Please figure out what you're doing wrong and stop doing it. | |
| 74193635 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-06 21:21 | 1 | 2019-09-08 02:37 | Carnildo | Most tools don't care if you spell it "FIXME", "fixme", or "FixMe", they'll alert on any variation of capitalization. |
| 2 | 2019-09-08 12:06 | freebeer ♦1,598 | FIXME also has the advantage for humans of standing out in a non-tool review as YELLING, and it appears for me in a C locale sorted before normal OSM lowercase tags, rather than being mixed halfway down the ever-increasing tags that require further scrolling and often easy to overlook.i have als... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-17 00:35 | freebeer ♦1,598 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74553367 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging | |
| 74182841 by Dearc @ 2019-09-06 15:33 | 1 | 2019-09-08 02:25 | Carnildo | Thanks for helping keep things up-to-date!A quick request: please don't abbreviate things. It's easy for a computer to create an abbreviation if it needs to save space, but automatically expanding an abbreviation is much harder. For example, should "St." be expanded to &quo... |
| 74098442 by MissingCSAA @ 2019-09-04 17:14 | 1 | 2019-09-06 08:43 | Carnildo | Please be more careful when editing large relations like this. You both broke the Lolo National Forest boundary and left the reservation boundary in an incomplete state. |
| 74072556 by Howpper @ 2019-09-04 08:40 | 1 | 2019-09-05 09:53 | Carnildo | Where are you getting the information that Prichard Creek Road/FS 9 is a secondary road? It hasn't been an important part of the road network since gold mining ended a century ago -- they don't even bother to plow it past Murray in the winter. |
| 74062381 by kajord @ 2019-09-04 02:18 | 1 | 2019-09-05 09:11 | Carnildo | Have you confirmed the accuracy of the shapefile you used? Some of the Forest Service trail maps have rather serious errors, such as running along the wrong side of a lake, or having junctions a mile or more from the actual location. |
| 73772087 by lasagna @ 2019-08-26 22:51 | 1 | 2019-08-28 06:52 | Carnildo | GIS data isn't infalliable. The "44th Avenue" you added is a private driveway. |
| 73727672 by Glassman @ 2019-08-25 22:17 | 1 | 2019-08-27 07:52 | Carnildo | Could you please do your cleanup in smaller pieces? It makes it easier to fix when you delete something (such as National Forest Development Road 2291) that you shouldn't have. |
| 2 | 2019-08-27 17:54 | Glassman ♦5,217 | The USFS no longer has a road there. Plus the existing road was listed as residential. I don't want someone getting stranded there because we showed it suitable for the average sedan. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/737276... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-27 18:37 | Carnildo | What's your source for the road not being there? I've driven or hiked on quite a few roads (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13920613 and the surrounding tracks) that the Forest Service shows as not being there.Judging from the surface quality shown in the Esri Clarity imager... | |
| 73729325 by Korgi1 @ 2019-08-26 00:48 | 1 | 2019-08-27 09:05 | Carnildo | I'm pretty sure that what you've mapped is just a barn, and the grange hall is the blue-roofed building across the street. |
| 73685197 by oliveracl @ 2019-08-23 22:24 | 1 | 2019-08-25 09:35 | Carnildo | Is Boulder Falls better described as a cliff, or as a waterfall? |
| 2 | 2019-08-25 12:12 | olivercl ♦1 | It is a waterfall, but I could not find that option under points | |
| 3 | 2019-08-26 06:03 | Carnildo | What did you try searching by? The tag lookup system isn't always perfect (for example, it used to be that you could only find road types if you searched for "road", not "street").If all else fails, you can always add tags the hard way, by selecting a type of "poin... | |
| 73689562 by choessei @ 2019-08-24 06:38 | 1 | 2019-08-25 20:24 | Carnildo | As a general rule, driveways should be tagged as driveways rather than tracks even if they're unpaved. |
| 71079662 by Glassman @ 2019-06-09 19:43 | 1 | 2019-08-25 07:44 | Carnildo | Your aim seems to have been a bit off here. ARCpoint Labs is one building further south than where you placed it. |
| 73639759 by Tubbybtch @ 2019-08-22 19:34 | 1 | 2019-08-22 22:57 | Carnildo | Thanks for your interest in improving the map.Unfortunately, I'm afraid this edit needs to be reverted. The STA terms of service (https://www.spokanetransit.com/about-sta/developers-terms-of-use) don't permit their GTFS data to be used in OpenStreetMap (among other problems, they can ... |
| 73598419 by Jessica Self @ 2019-08-21 22:02 | 1 | 2019-08-22 08:49 | Carnildo | Please don't abbreviate names, particularly if they're already non-abbreviated. If a computer needs to save space, it's easy to construct an abbreviation, but going the other way is far harder. For example, should "st" be expanded to "state", "street", ... |
| 73559917 by Tubbybtch @ 2019-08-21 00:56 | 1 | 2019-08-21 09:49 | Carnildo | I don't know if you've noticed, but you can change which background imagery you're using by clicking on the "Background Settings" tab in the editor (it looks a little like three stacked sheets of paper) and selecting which imagery you want to use. In the Spokane area, the &... |
| 2 | 2019-08-22 04:33 | Tubbybtch ♦1 | I've already been using that...thanks for the input. | |
| 73548469 by blahmah @ 2019-08-20 16:39 | 1 | 2019-08-21 09:25 | Carnildo | Thanks for your addition -- it's always useful to have locally-known features added to the map.You made a couple of mistakes here, though: first, elevations in OSM are measured in meters, not feet -- a 4826-meter-tall mountain would be the tallest in the lower 48. And second, the second di... |
| 73519091 by skoocoom @ 2019-08-20 01:53 | 1 | 2019-08-20 10:11 | Carnildo | Quite a few of the roads you deleted here were correctly-mapped driveways. |
| 2 | 2019-08-20 20:40 | skoocoom ♦3 | I believe that anything I deleted was inaccurately placed. In areas with lots of bad TIGER data I generally just delete the residential roads that correspond to driveways rather than trying to fix up their position and attributes. | |
| 3 | 2019-08-21 08:22 | Carnildo | I'm trying to figure out how best to revert this, since several of the driveways you deleted (eg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6213884) were correctly aligned and tagged, while others (eg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6212680) were correctly aligned but incorrectly tagged. | |
| 4 | 2019-08-21 08:40 | Carnildo | Okay, I think I figured out a workable method. 26 driveways and three residential roads restored. | |
| 5 | 2019-08-21 21:43 | skoocoom ♦3 | Fair enough. | |
| 73500627 by Jessica Self @ 2019-08-19 14:10 | 1 | 2019-08-20 09:47 | Carnildo | If something doesn't have a name, you don't need to give it one. Lanes in parking lots almost never have names, and someone looking for a parking space is going to be quite confused if their GPS tells them to "turn left on parking lot, and then turn right on parking lot". |
| 73452469 by Howpper @ 2019-08-17 21:52 | 1 | 2019-08-18 06:42 | Carnildo | Where are you getting this planned road from? It's inside the airport security fence (which argues against it being built), passes through the runway 6 overrun area (which argues more strongly that it won't be built), and traffic on it would interfere with the runway 6 ILS (which pretty m... |
| 73452351 by Howpper @ 2019-08-17 21:44 | 1 | 2019-08-18 06:26 | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset. The road construction you've mapped is changing too rapidly to be worth mapping -- for example, the closure of 1st Avenue was for today only. |
| 73444114 by Howpper @ 2019-08-17 14:25 | 1 | 2019-08-18 05:13 | Carnildo | I've reverted this changeset. Most if not all of it is based on outdated information; the map prior to this changeset reflected the street signs and road geometry that was actually preset when I drove through there two years ago. |
| 73389238 by Bellvall Indi @ 2019-08-15 19:07 | 1 | 2019-08-15 20:29 | HeyItsAdam ♦41 | Could you perhaps have a separate changeset for both next time? It seems like the two POI's are on different continents, meaning your changeset area covers a ton of people who don't need to see this at all, thanks! |
| 2 | 2019-08-16 00:47 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | It's the first edit of a Maps.me user, I doubt they have any idea of what a changeset and what you're talking about. | |
| 3 | 2019-08-16 02:00 | HeyItsAdam ♦41 | Oh, I'm not familiar with maps.me at all. Curious, what about the fact that it's maps.me would make them not know? Never really heard of it before | |
| 4 | 2019-08-16 06:55 | Carnildo | It's a map and navigation app with a very-poorly-designed POI editor. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MAPS.ME | |
| 73347081 by Howpper @ 2019-08-14 12:39 | 1 | 2019-08-15 07:25 | Carnildo | You appear to have deleted a fair bit of sidewalk, crosswalk, and curb mapping along Keene Road. Was this intentional? |
| 2 | 2019-08-16 00:30 | Howpper ♦121 | Wouldn't it be better to give the roads sidewalk tags as opposed to mapping dead-end sidewalks. If the sidewalks are mapped separately, there would be issues getting pedestrian directions using OpenStreetMap. | |
| 3 | 2019-08-16 06:41 | Carnildo | Mapping sidewalks separately is the more detailed option -- it lets you map things like curb/ramp types, "do not cross" signs, and other things that don't fit onto a road's sidewalk tags. | |
| 73361611 by LisiMeier @ 2019-08-14 18:56 | 1 | 2019-08-15 08:49 | Carnildo | Are you sure the trail you added around the Bulkley River has a smoothness of "impassible"? It doesn't look like it from the aerial imagery. |
| 2 | 2019-08-15 19:13 | DaveF ♦1,562 | HiYou've added two ways on either side of the Atlantic with no tags. | |
| 3 | 2021-05-30 12:57 | nurdafur ♦224 | Hallo LisiDu hast hier bei Oberhittnau einen Zeltplatz zugefügt. Ist dies wirklich ein öffentlicher Zeltplatz? Mir scheint, dass der Ort eher von Pfadfindern als Sommerlagerplatz benutzt werden kann.Liebe GrüsseUrs | |
| 4 | 2021-05-30 14:18 | LisiMeier ♦4 | Salü UrsIch habe keine Ahnung mehr. Wenn du denkst das es nicht ein Zeltplatz ist, kannst du das Zelt weg nehmen. Gruss Coni | |
| 73055437 by Howpper @ 2019-08-06 09:00 | 1 | 2019-08-07 08:29 | Carnildo | Are you sure about the non-existence of the farmland you removed here? Aerial imagery from this spring still shows it. |
| 72946513 by LarsBG @ 2019-08-02 15:29 | 1 | 2019-08-03 08:03 | Carnildo | Cylindrical buildings on a hillside surrounded by a fence? Good bet they're water tanks, not silos. |
| 72919729 by Natfoot @ 2019-08-02 02:14 | 1 | 2019-08-02 09:58 | Carnildo | The usual classification for logging roads is "track", not "service". |
| 2 | 2019-08-02 13:54 | Natfoot ♦56 | Carnildo, could you please link to that standard? | |
| 3 | 2019-08-02 18:01 | Carnildo | The first sentence of the wiki page on highway=track (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack) and about a million miles of usage. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#National_Forest_Road_System and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_... | |
| 72873181 by Rtevans01 @ 2019-07-31 21:08 | 1 | 2019-08-01 08:59 | Carnildo | Thanks for your contribution!You seem to have mis-placed both of these offices by about a mile to the east. I've fixed the locations, but it's something to keep in mind in the future. |
| 72854391 by Marius Van Nieuwenhuyse @ 2019-07-31 12:33 | 1 | 2019-08-01 08:00 | Carnildo | Please be more careful in your editing. In the changes I've reviewed, you haven't gotten a single road classification correct: you've tagged driveways as paths and tertiary roads, you've tagged logging roads and farm tracks as paths, and you've drawn roads that don't e... |
| 72853216 by Marius Van Nieuwenhuyse @ 2019-07-31 12:09 | 1 | 2019-08-01 07:43 | Carnildo | I'm not seeing the building you added in any of the available imagery. Where did you get it from? |
| 72791815 by Jenz914 @ 2019-07-30 02:35 | 1 | 2019-07-31 09:02 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you moved a couple of address points across the map in Enumclaw? |
| 72619254 by aweech @ 2019-07-24 21:06 | 1 | 2019-07-25 09:04 | Carnildo | Is "@ night" the correct condition for Montana speed limits? I've been using "@ (dusk-dawn)". |
| 2 | 2019-07-25 20:29 | aweech ♦369 | I just used "@ night" because the signs used the word "night". I'll change the ones I added yesterday to "@ (dusk-dawn)" for consistancy. | |
| 72527036 by Rick Rupp @ 2019-07-22 18:08 | 1 | 2019-07-23 09:14 | Carnildo | Did you mean to move "Math Learning Annex" across the map? There's a building in the aerial imagery in the old location, but not in the new one. |
| 2 | 2019-07-23 16:36 | Rick Rupp ♦7 | Thank you for catching that error. I have corrected it. I'm not sure how that happened as I wasn't editing that feature. | |
| 72491927 by MajorTC @ 2019-07-21 20:35 | 1 | 2019-07-23 03:22 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you removed a road and some retail areas in this edit? It looks like they're still there in the aerial imagery. |
| 2 | 2019-07-23 18:04 | MajorTC ♦3 | I didn't intend to leave the road deleted, just change it from what it was. My mistake. Got sidetracked and forgot. I fixed it. I deleted the retail areas, because they aren't retail areas, as they are restaurants and motels, not shops. | |
| 69865811 by Spark1815 @ 2019-05-04 04:47 | 1 | 2019-05-05 04:24 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you deleted the Whispering Hills apartment complex? "Updated street information" doesn't explain much. |
| 2 | 2019-05-12 03:56 | Spark1815 ♦1 | I didn't realize I had deleted anything. | |
| 3 | 2019-05-13 05:53 | Carnildo | Okay, I've restored the apartments. | |
| 4 | 2019-07-22 23:12 | Spark1815 ♦1 | Thank you for the feedback. Pretty new to this and don't necessarily know all of the proper conventions. | |
| 5 | 2019-07-22 23:18 | Spark1815 ♦1 | Question, what did I actually delete? I checked and the name of the apartments is present but none of the structures are visible on the West side of SW Golden Hills Dr. | |
| 6 | 2019-07-22 23:44 | Carnildo | If you look at your edit in a changeset viewer such as ACHAVI, you'll see that you deleted the Whispering Hills Apartments landuse: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69865811 | |
| 72369713 by DeanP @ 2019-07-18 02:19 | 1 | 2019-07-18 09:11 | Carnildo | Please don't use the "name" field to describe things. It's obvious that a building is a building from the tags you've applied; putting "building" in the "name" field just confuses computers, which see nothing wrong with a building named "building&qu... |
| 72242487 by MissingCSAA @ 2019-07-14 20:43 | 1 | 2019-07-15 09:11 | Carnildo | You've managed to make quite the mess of the Navajo border, the America/Denver timezone, and the America/Phoenix timezone. I'm working on fixing them. |
| 2 | 2019-07-15 09:57 | Carnildo | Okay, I think I've got it sorted out. Please be more careful in the future. | |
| 3 | 2019-07-15 21:27 | MissingCSAA ♦51 | Yeah, it was definitely a work in progress with some difficulty on the concurrencies. Thanks for cleaning up. | |
| 72103719 by sean2019 @ 2019-07-10 17:00 | 1 | 2019-07-10 21:43 | Carnildo | Could you be more careful when you're adding these details? For example, you mapped two streams as flowing uphill. |
| 72028845 by DunbarLoop @ 2019-07-08 20:14 | 1 | 2019-07-09 09:07 | Carnildo | Does the information board you added, by any chance, refer to Adair as being a former town? If so, you might want to re-tag Adair as being a "locality" rather than a "hamlet" (which implies it's still populated). |
| 72021155 by FunkyBuffalo @ 2019-07-08 16:03 | 1 | 2019-07-08 16:18 | Hjart ♦4,116 | I've removed the nonexisting service road you added in Denmark |
| 2 | 2019-07-09 08:34 | Carnildo | And I've removed one from Alaska. Please be more careful with your mapping. | |
| 71981524 by ppjj @ 2019-07-07 12:51 | 1 | 2019-07-08 07:51 | Carnildo | If you're going to be adding new construction to Spokane County, please don't use Esri Clarity as your imagery. Except at the highest zoom levels, it's literally the oldest imagery currently available.DigitalGlobe/Maxar Premium is the newest available, but Esri World Imagery is m... |
| 2 | 2019-07-08 13:37 | freebeer ♦1,598 | um, carnildo, can you give me an example of a differing higher zoom level, as i have never seen the archive bing imagery exceed z19 in the us, other countries may be less? and despite my recent disbelief, the highest zoom still looks to match a decade-old archive.thanquez. | |
| 3 | 2019-07-08 17:57 | Carnildo | The best example I've seen is https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?#map=19/47.65192/-117.41406At z19 and further out, Esri Clarity shows the old Browne Medical Building. About halfway between z19 and z20, it switches to imagery matching Esri World Imagery, showing the Inland Northwest Behavi... | |
| 4 | 2019-07-09 11:02 | freebeer ♦1,598 | i think i know what you are seeing -- my potlatch2 editor shows the old layout at z19, but when i step to z20, i get no tiles.https://a.tile.openstreetmap.org/19/91147/183005.png is the rendered data for part of the building, which maps tohttps://clarity.maptiles.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/service... | |
| 71998355 by iM_Edward @ 2019-07-08 05:33 | 1 | 2019-07-08 10:09 | Carnildo | Naming a house "house" is redundant, and confuses computers (they tend to be rather literal-minded). Instead, you can apply the "house" tag. |
| 71981944 by Howpper @ 2019-07-07 13:11 | 1 | 2019-07-08 08:09 | Carnildo | I'm pretty sure this platform is long-abandoned. Esri Clarity and Mapbox imagery both show it as being badly overgrown. |
| 71971901 by buford_nw @ 2019-07-07 01:04 | 1 | 2019-07-07 20:55 | Carnildo | Please don't abbreviate names. It's easy for a computer to construct an abbreviation if it needs to save space, but expanding one is nearly impossible. "Ln" for "Lane" isn't too bad, but should "St" be expanded to "Street", "Saint", ... |
| 2 | 2019-07-08 14:17 | freebeer ♦1,598 | carni, for the sake of further picking an argument, can i posit Line as an expansion of ln?i can probably come up with further possibilities like Loon or Luna, that are not realistic, and other language examples escape me now.oh, St can also mean Sankt and probably more. Strada? may well s... | |
| 71882435 by 4ever_jj @ 2019-07-04 05:14 | 1 | 2019-07-04 06:02 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Please note that OSM is not a place for personal bookmarks |
| 2 | 2019-07-04 06:13 | Carnildo | Thanks for your contribution!Unfortunately, there are a number of issues with it.First and foremost, bare names are of almost no use. It's of far more value if you add tags indicating what sort of thing each name applies to: for example, Great Basin National Park is a "boundary=na... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-04 10:07 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Should we revert this right away? The majority appears to be just duplicates of info already in our database. | |
| 4 | 2019-07-04 18:31 | Carnildo | I'm not sure. On the one hand, I don't think there's anything in the changeset besides new nodes with just a "name=" tag. They're just about invisible and easy to revert if needed. On the other hand, the longer we wait, the more likely it is that people will start de... | |
| 5 | 2019-07-07 23:51 | 4004 ♦1,882 | can someone drop dwg a line? | |
| 6 | 2019-07-13 07:16 | user_5359 ♦19,360 | I have revert this name only node change set (and no: I am not from the DWG). | |
| 71865266 by Howpper @ 2019-07-03 15:36 | 1 | 2019-07-04 06:38 | Carnildo | Are you sure you've got the turn restriction correct here? It looks to me like the purpose of the turn lane is to permit drivers to go from southbound Greene Street to the service road. |
| 2 | 2019-07-07 13:50 | Howpper ♦121 | Sorry for the late response. Thank you for pointing out my mistake, I have since fixed it. | |
| 71858839 by datamongers @ 2019-07-03 12:51 | 1 | 2019-07-04 06:18 | Carnildo | I've been using the "Fishing Spot" tag when adding fishing access sites in Montana. |
| 71770677 by Howpper @ 2019-07-01 04:30 | 1 | 2019-07-02 08:40 | Carnildo | I don't know where you got this version of Saltese Uplands Conservation Area from, but it doesn't match the on-the-ground reality. The small corner of land between the parking lot and Henry Road may on paper be public right-of-way, but in practice, it's used and managed as part of th... |
| 71753988 by Howpper @ 2019-06-30 11:22 | 1 | 2019-07-01 07:24 | Carnildo | Are you sure about these roads? Sentinel satellite imagery from two weeks ago shows a very different alignment for Colonial, Meyers, and 15th. |
| 71539760 by DJ Cane @ 2019-06-23 19:31 | 1 | 2019-06-24 17:55 | Carnildo | I think "Wastewater basin" would be a better tag than "pond" for the settling ponds in a waste-treatment plant. |
| 71145417 by jseigneuret @ 2019-06-11 15:03 | 1 | 2019-06-12 06:55 | Carnildo | A quick spot-check indicates that this "fix" made things worse: for example, the original tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3225792544 were pointless or confusing, but would be ignored by almost everything. The new tags include an invalid "type=ROAD", which could cause ... |
| 2 | 2019-06-12 07:04 | jseigneuret ♦37 | Hi I delete objectif only but there is lot of key in previous changeset with bad practice and lot of key that are related to a massive import since Arcgis. lot of geospatial database have its key in uppercase. Please contact previous contributor. | |
| 3 | 2019-06-12 17:04 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | @jseigneuret You can contact the previous contributor yourself - just find the changeset that made the problem change and commend in the changeset discussion there. It sounds like you've affected many previous changesets here though? | |
| 4 | 2019-06-12 20:03 | jseigneuret ♦37 | Yes because I have delete a key with overpass query.OBJECTID =*This is not a significant information and I have fixed other information. I can explain that with all persons but I think this is an error import with JOSM and opendata plugin import... I have just delete specific ArcGIS keys wit... | |
| 5 | 2019-06-13 09:27 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | @jseigneuret You've actually deleted lots of nodes here, not just "specific ArcGIS keys with JOSM". I'm not sure what you mean by "and overpass Query by territorial zones". | |
| 6 | 2019-06-13 10:39 | jseigneuret ♦37 | in fact there is lot of none duplicated and building superpossition.I revert this changeset. and data alert can be fix directly by locals contributors. | |
| 7 | 2019-06-13 13:47 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Thanks | |
| 8 | 2019-06-17 14:04 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,does anybody object to removing 96 nodes like this one?http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3357505061They all seem to indicate road names or POI that are mapped. | |
| 9 | 2019-06-17 14:17 | jseigneuret ♦37 | this is not exceptional, There is initially dupplicated object so the revert detect indentical object and I don't push it when I revert data. | |
| 70972864 by classicedition @ 2019-06-06 03:01 | 1 | 2019-06-07 00:24 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | Hi - you've added Olinger Park so that the majority of the mapped area just covers South Main street - is the park the area between South Main and South Columbia? |
| 2 | 2019-06-07 15:14 | classicedition ♦1 | It actually starts on the left side of south main by the rite-aid and then if you cross the road, that triangle looking section is also part of the park. Is my edit incorrect? Should I have mapped two separate sections and labelled them both as the same park instead of including the road? If so I ap... | |
| 3 | 2019-06-08 06:43 | Carnildo | I've deleted it -- "Olinger Park" isn't listed on the Milton-Freewater website, nor does the website list a park in that location by any name. The triangle between Main, Columbia, and Second looks like generic urban green space, not a park, and I didn't see any signs giving... | |
| 4 | 2019-06-08 06:54 | Carnildo | There's been a spate of new users adding spurious "parks" to try to get an advantage in Pokemon Go, and this looked a great deal like one of those. If you want to re-add it, go ahead -- but I've got two recommendations if you do so:First, I recommend switching to the older-b... | |
| 5 | 2019-06-08 18:40 | classicedition ♦1 | I've lived in M-F my entire life and our website is a pathetic joke and doesn't list a lot of parks we actually have here, hell most maps and sites don't even show the school that was built last year and still show the cannery that was torn down. Go to google street view and look ther... | |
| 6 | 2019-06-09 08:28 | Carnildo | I see it. I've put the park back. | |
| 7 | 2019-06-10 13:05 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | All discussion above, I still wouldn't map the park so that the majority of it is South Main Street - this isn't accurate to what is on the ground - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_groundIf both sides of the street are the same park, maybe create a... | |
| 71034818 by Glassman @ 2019-06-07 18:40 | 1 | 2019-06-07 22:38 | Carnildo | The section of Conklin Road you added looks pretty "former" to me. If you switch over to Esri World Imagery (a few months older than DigitalGlobe Premium, but much sharper), you'll see a fallen log that looks like it's been there for a while, and a couple of trees that are proba... |
| 2 | 2019-06-07 23:20 | Glassman ♦5,217 | ESRI helps a lot - I see the log but only a pixelated version of it in DG Premium. I removed the section. | |
| 70972003 by Bhafner2 @ 2019-06-06 01:56 | 1 | 2019-06-06 19:54 | Carnildo | The "residential road" tag you used for the roads you added down by Walla Walla is intended for things like house-lined suburban streets. A better tag for what you added is "driveway".(Historically, "residential road" has also been used as the default tag for "... |
| 70938928 by StormyKieschnick @ 2019-06-04 21:45 | 1 | 2019-06-06 09:05 | Carnildo | Please don't use abbreviations in names. It's easy for a computer to abbreviate a word if it needs to save space, but going the other direction is much harder. For example, should "St" be expanded to "Street", "State", or "Saint"? |
| 70915792 by Foxisoft @ 2019-06-04 09:43 | 1 | 2019-06-06 08:12 | Carnildo | Has Horse Haven been re-opened? Last I heard, it was very much an abandoned airstrip. |
| 70838259 by MappingJunkie @ 2019-06-01 15:51 | 1 | 2019-06-05 09:31 | Carnildo | Is there a reason you deleted the driveway here? It sure looks like it exists in the aerial imagery. |
| 2 | 2019-06-07 17:06 | MappingJunkie ♦10 | When I drove by, it appeared to be an unnamed private driveway. Feel free to add it back if you think it is consequential. | |
| 70763151 by interwooven @ 2019-05-30 10:12 | 1 | 2019-06-01 04:15 | Carnildo | If you're going to do a Maproulette task, please actually *do* the task. If a driveway is misaligned and mis-tagged, marking it as "looks okay" doesn't count. |
| 70761376 by rittoch @ 2019-05-30 09:09 | 1 | 2019-05-31 07:44 | Carnildo | Please don't mark a road that doesn't exist as "looks okay". |
| 70759215 by interwooven @ 2019-05-30 07:49 | 1 | 2019-05-31 06:47 | Carnildo | Please don't mark non-existent roads as "looks okay". |
| 70466926 by Howpper @ 2019-05-21 07:42 | 1 | 2019-05-31 05:19 | Carnildo | The historic map you're citing here is a plat map, not a road map. It shows how the land is subdivided for ownership, and where space is reserved for building roads, but not where roads are actually built.For an example of why plat maps aren't useful for mapping roads, consider this m... |
| 70672286 by edathy @ 2019-05-27 19:09 Active block | 1 | 2019-05-30 04:04 | Carnildo | This edit appears to have left a gap in the Milk River when you deleted way 95334308. Was this intentional? |
| 70674522 by Howpper @ 2019-05-27 20:49 | 1 | 2019-05-27 20:52 | Howpper ♦121 | According to wiki, this is a valid access tag. |
| 2 | 2019-05-27 21:17 | LeifRasmussen ♦88 | According to national standards, bicycles are *only* allowed on interstates in some few cases where using that interstate is the *only* way to get from one point to another without a huge detour (such as 100 miles). Bikes (and mopeds, horses, etc.) are not allowed on most interstates. I think th... | |
| 3 | 2019-05-27 21:20 | LeifRasmussen ♦88 | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-motorized_access_on_freewaysWikipedia states that in Washington, bicycles can use interstates wherever they are not specifically banned. | |
| 4 | 2019-05-28 21:11 | Carnildo | There's a specific ban on bicycles on I-90 heading eastward from the Geiger junction near Airway Heights, but I don't know how far east it extends. | |
| 70526667 by skquinn @ 2019-05-22 19:07 | 1 | 2019-05-25 06:15 | Carnildo | Are you doing an automated conversion here? I'm seeing a number of "opening_hours:rubbish" on things that are quite human-readable. |
| 2 | 2019-05-25 07:37 | skquinn ♦803 | The opening_hours tag is *not* a freeform human-readable tag; there is a syntax defined for it that software using the data is relying on. These are entries that could not be fixed by JOSM's validator, that I also could not fix. I fixed what I could by hand. | |
| 3 | 2019-05-25 18:39 | Carnildo | I'm aware that it's not freeform, but I'd expect someone fixing these by hand to spot mistakes such as using the "|" character instead of a semicolon, or entering "10:30a-17:00" instead of "10:30-17:00". | |
| 70514343 by Foxisoft @ 2019-05-22 12:55 | 1 | 2019-05-25 05:55 | Carnildo | Is the Selway Lodge runway still in use? All available imagery shows an "X" at the north end indicating permanent closure. |
| 70354446 by lizy_busy @ 2019-05-17 12:14 | 1 | 2019-05-18 05:52 | Carnildo | It looks like you forgot to add the "building" tag to the building you drew. |
| 69958417 by JustinOMeara @ 2019-05-07 04:10 | 1 | 2019-05-07 05:47 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Thank you. Next time please stick to max 1 country per changeset. |
| 2 | 2019-05-07 08:13 | Carnildo | Are you sure the buildings you added to Sammamis Village are correct? I think you might have been working off of outdated imagery, deleting new buildings and replacing them with old ones. | |
| 3 | 2019-05-16 09:12 | dieterdreist ♦839 | Has there been feedback from the mapper yet? In this case https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568519130 it looks as if a demolished house was added from outdated imagery (or my imagery was outdated and it was reconstructed in the meantime). In the Sammamish case, e.g. here https://www.openstreetmap.or... | |
| 4 | 2019-05-16 21:08 | Carnildo | For the Sammamish situation, the original mapping was done from imagery (Mapbox Satellite) showing halfway-finished construction. JustinOMeara then added buildings traced from pre-construction imagery (Bing). I was subsequently able to verify that Esri imagery was post-construction, and re-mapped ... | |
| 70212750 by JustinSaneV2 @ 2019-05-14 00:47 | 1 | 2019-05-14 06:53 | Carnildo | Those two points were what are known as "address nodes": points that give the location of an address. I've restored them. |
| 70162256 by ppjj @ 2019-05-12 14:37 | 1 | 2019-05-13 05:41 | Carnildo | When you're editing in Spokane County, please use the "Esri World Imagery" layer. It's the newest available, where "Esri Clarity", at least at most zoom levels, is the oldest. |
| 70165015 by Nicolas Pare @ 2019-05-12 16:35 | 1 | 2019-05-12 23:51 | Glassman ♦5,217 | That is a lot of activity on one upload. Did you visit each site? |
| 2 | 2019-05-13 05:28 | Carnildo | A quick spot-check says that most if not all of them are Maps.Me bookmarks. Probably the best thing to do is just revert the entire changeset. | |
| 3 | 2019-05-13 16:23 | Jarek 🚲 ♦321 | this changeset has been discussed in talk-ca https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2019-May/009307.html | |
| 4 | 2019-05-13 16:51 | PierZen ♦262 | Merci Nicolas pour ta contribution. Quelques commentaires et tu peux venir en discuter sur la liste de discussion https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/ (il faut s'inscrire avec adresse de courriel). On doit Éviter de couvrir de grandes régions dans une meme Session... | |
| 5 | 2019-05-30 00:58 | keithonearth ♦314 | I found this discussion about reverting this changeset when I found this node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6468319591), which is incorrectly tagged (puts a description in the name value, tags it a tourist attraction, rather than a bar), poorly located (about 100m away from where it should be,... | |
| 6 | 2022-04-07 13:04 | A Hall ♦53 | Checking in here to add to the discussion. I just found a useless node (attraction, no description, no idea what the 'attraction' is). If anyone else stumbles upon this changeset there's a good chance that reverting/deleting whatever you found is the right way to go. | |
| 69951867 by Howpper @ 2019-05-06 21:08 | 1 | 2019-05-07 06:53 | Carnildo | Where did you get the name "Riverside" from? |
| 2 | 2019-05-11 19:17 | Howpper ♦121 | Sorry for the late reply. There are literally signs outside the locale. https://www.google.com/maps/@47.9643405,-117.3495128,3a,75y,31.12h,79.9t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1spKBHPWAQgbTtW5InKDPYnQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 | |
| 3 | 2019-05-12 20:00 | Carnildo | Thanks. | |
| 70138770 by mapman44 @ 2019-05-11 14:17 | 1 | 2019-05-12 07:16 | Carnildo | Please don't do this. Many of these "name_1"s are the result of bad TIGER data, and have no basis in reality. For others, the "name=" tag is incorrect, and it's the "name_1" tag that has the correct name. It's not something you can fix remotely. |
| 2 | 2019-05-12 14:04 | mapman44 ♦526 | I am not deleting the names. I am just following the wiki that the "name" key should not be followed by a number. This is the area where I live and I know most, if not all, of the correct names. If it's something I'm not sure about I can check the Coos County GIS map for the offi... | |
| 3 | 2019-05-12 19:24 | Carnildo | Sorry about that.It looked like you were doing this remotely because the changeset boundaries enclose the entire state of Oregon -- exactly the sort of thing I'd expect from a state-by-state armchair cleanup. | |
| 4 | 2019-05-12 20:03 | mapman44 ♦526 | No problem. Better to make sure than to have to clean up a mess later.Most of the changesets in Oregon are just deleting orphan nodes with no tags or info. I try to spend some of my editing time on clean up. Not much fun but it's easy when my brain is tired. Jerry | |
| 69957895 by mapman44 @ 2019-05-07 03:43 | 1 | 2019-05-07 07:57 | Carnildo | An orphaned node isn't always a "delete this" situation. In this case, it was a mis-formatted address node (information in the name= tag rather than the addr:*= tags). I've restored and fixed it. |
| 2 | 2019-05-07 13:24 | mapman44 ♦526 | Sorry for any problem it caused for you. Jerry | |
| 69865174 by Spark1815 @ 2019-05-04 03:16 | 1 | 2019-05-05 04:19 | Carnildo | "Living street" is pretty much a purely European concept. If you find yourself looking at something in the US that you think might be a living street, it's probably something like a low-speed residential road or a shared driveway. |
| 69739838 by emem @ 2019-04-30 15:47 | 1 | 2019-05-02 05:40 | Carnildo | If you check the Bing Streetside imagery for this area, you'll see that the parking aisle you deleted because it intersected the Mountain Valley Inn does, in fact, exist, and it passes through the building just as the tags on it indicated. |
| 2 | 2019-05-02 05:55 | emem ♦7 | As - I see. But that service road had no tags, no nodes designating entry/exit into the building. Please put those in at all times - otherwise its simply intersections that just look like when new buildings are added where there were previously just roads. | |
| 69646026 by cbeddow @ 2019-04-27 17:45 | 1 | 2019-04-29 05:53 | Carnildo | When you fixed the outline of the Tamarack Brewing building, you also deleted a "Tamarack Brewing" restaurant node, leaving Tamarack Brewing as simply a "building=yes". Was this intentional? |
| 2 | 2019-04-29 09:14 | cbeddow ♦26 | I didn't mean to do that entirely--I was meaning to add restaurant=yes to the building as well as brewery=yes. I am not sure what the best way to tag a brewery with a restaurant in it is and haven't been able to find a clear answer, but I realize it's best to leave the restaurant POI ... | |
| 69517755 by annakulikowa @ 2019-04-24 09:01 | 1 | 2019-04-25 06:09 | Carnildo | If you're going to do a MapRoulette task, please actually *do* the task. Leaving a non-existent road around but marking it as "I've reviewed this road" doesn't count. |
| 2 | 2019-04-25 08:55 | annakulikowa ♦12 | Hello Carnildo, In my opinion delition of data should do user with regional knowledge of this place. I checked this road on MapBox Satellite. Thank you for map improvement. | |
| 69438569 by Baloo Uriza @ 2019-04-22 02:42 | 1 | 2019-04-22 07:48 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you removed the speed limits from the westbound side of I-84 here? |
| 2 | 2019-04-24 11:53 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,108 | I intended to get more up to date speed limits from OpenStreetCam, but fell asleep. | |
| 69429200 by 3xodus @ 2019-04-21 16:48 | 1 | 2019-04-22 07:37 | Carnildo | A quick spot-check shows that many of the "Wendy's" you've touched in this edit aren't the fast-food chain -- they include a demolished building, a bus stop, two driveways, and a non-chain restaurant. |
| 2 | 2019-04-22 10:26 | 3xodus ♦1 | Thanks for the heads-up, I've fixed them. I'll be more careful. | |
| 69324456 by Spark1815 @ 2019-04-17 21:27 | 1 | 2019-04-18 06:54 | Carnildo | Is there a reason why you moved the Dairy Queen across the map here? There's a very fast-food-looking building at the original location, while the new location looks like a bank's parking lot. |
| 69214150 by Carnildo @ 2019-04-14 21:09 | 1 | 2019-04-14 23:37 | Carnildo | There appears to be a bug in JOSM. The changeset comment for this should be "Extend driveway to road". |
| 69213565 by Carnildo @ 2019-04-14 20:35 | 1 | 2019-04-14 23:36 | Carnildo | There appears to be a bug in JOSM. The changeset comment for this should be "Merge duplicate POIs and improve outline". |
| 69210900 by e pt @ 2019-04-14 18:42 Active block | 1 | 2019-04-14 23:34 | Carnildo | If you're going to be editing in the Spokane area, I recommend using Esri World Imagery rather than DigitalGlobe Premium. It's slightly newer and better aligned. |
| 69102684 by Jessica12345 @ 2019-04-11 04:27 | 1 | 2019-04-14 04:35 | Carnildo | It's not always a mistake to map the stores of a strip mall as a collection of buildings.As a general rule, if the parts are structurally independent (you can take one out and the others won't fall down), they can be mapped as separate buildings. This sort of situation is very common ... |
| 69013697 by Jessica12345 @ 2019-04-08 16:24 | 1 | 2019-04-09 08:18 | Carnildo | Is "Columbia Basin Oral and Maxilofacial" better described as a physician, or a dentist? |
| 2 | 2019-04-11 02:27 | Jessica12345 ♦15 | If there's an option for "oral surgeon" that would be even better. I'll see if I can find the most appropriate tags for it. | |
| 68966731 by Allison P @ 2019-04-07 03:58 | 1 | 2019-04-07 06:32 | TagaSanPedroAko ♦524 | 1,000 to 10,000 people is just a rule of thumb, and why would you reclassify places known as small cities into a village, such as Flin Flon, Manitoba? Unless you reply, I would (or someone else) partially or fully revert this edit. |
| 2 | 2019-04-07 06:35 | TagaSanPedroAko ♦524 | I undid your edit for Flin Flon. The other places you downgraded might be rolled back as well. | |
| 3 | 2019-04-07 07:03 | SD Mapman ♦39 | Also St. George UT is ~80,000... | |
| 4 | 2019-04-07 18:03 | Allison P ♦1,136 | @TagaSanPedroAko I did not realise that these classifications didn't have specific rules. I have made changes like this in the past and they have gone over with no comments. I can revert the entire changeset if desired. I did a small amount of research on some of the places mentioned (such as F... | |
| 5 | 2019-04-08 07:24 | Carnildo | In the western United States, it's common to raise the "place=" level of an urban area above what the population alone would call for if it's of regional importance.St. George, for example, is the largest city for a hundred miles in any direction (200 miles in any direction t... | |
| 68122583 by Kingdom2917 @ 2019-03-14 04:03 | 1 | 2019-03-14 14:42 | Glassman ♦5,217 | There is no park listed at this location or with this name in the cities records. County assessors shows this area as privately owned. Can you provide information to verify your edit? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68122583 ... |
| 2 | 2019-03-15 09:20 | Carnildo | As of last November's Sentinel-2 imagery, this area was very much under construction, and "Nashville Park" was simply an area of bare dirt. | |
| 3 | 2019-04-07 06:26 | Carnildo | No sign of the park in the March 26 imagery, either. I've removed it. | |
| 68932726 by Miker2k @ 2019-04-05 18:25 | 1 | 2019-04-07 02:11 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!In addition to the speed limit changes, you did what's called a "node drag", where you accidentally pulled part of Greensferry Road south across the map. I've fixed it for you, but could you please be more careful in the future? |
| 68897334 by Jessica12345 @ 2019-04-04 19:48 | 1 | 2019-04-06 07:04 | Carnildo | Does "Journeys" have two locations in the mall, or did you accidentally add them twice? |
| 2 | 2019-04-06 14:29 | Jessica12345 ♦15 | There are two. One has stuff for kids, the other has stuff for adults, like how there are two Macy's (one for women, one for men and kids). | |
| 68758527 by Sparky1908 @ 2019-04-01 15:23 | 1 | 2019-04-02 08:24 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!If a building has become vacant, don't give it a name of "Vacant". Computers tend to be rather literal-minded, and see nothing wrong with showing a supermarket named "Vacant" in search results. Instead, you should delete the attributes of the that no lon... |
| 2 | 2019-04-02 16:49 | Sparky1908 ♦1 | OK Cool, I go ahead and delete it. | |
| 68735457 by Mi55oula @ 2019-03-31 20:55 | 1 | 2019-04-01 04:55 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!Please don't use the "name" field to describe things. It's confusing for people who are relying on the map for directions. (Picture a GPS unit saying "Take a left turn onto Unnamed Steeper Alternative to M trail".) |
| 68672846 by iTax27 @ 2019-03-29 17:21 | 1 | 2019-03-30 08:14 | Carnildo | Are you sure that removing the name is the correct thing to do here? It's a downhill ski route, and "No Name" is a perfectly reasonable thing for someone with a sense of humor to name a downhill ski route. |
| 68525794 by nhanway @ 2019-03-25 22:34 | 1 | 2019-03-27 06:35 | Carnildo | I've partially reverted this edit. There's been recent construction not yet visible in aerial imagery that eliminates the connection between southbound Upriver and eastbound Mission. |
| 68459502 by emilyw18 @ 2019-03-24 02:18 | 1 | 2019-03-25 00:01 | Carnildo | Correctly adding an island to OSM is tricky -- after drawing the island, you need to subtract it out of the water body that it's in, by creating or updating what's called a "multipolygon relation". I've taken care of it for you here.This is something that's tricky ... |
| 2 | 2019-03-25 02:11 | Viajero Perdido ♦243 | Also note that place=islet is more appropriate for areas < 1 sq km, such as this one. When given a name, micro "islands" are absurdly prominent on some maps. | |
| 68403794 by rittoch @ 2019-03-22 09:43 | 1 | 2019-03-24 08:24 | Carnildo | If you're going to do a MapRoulette task, please actually *do* the task. Don't just change things to make it go away. |
| 2 | 2019-03-25 06:01 | rittoch ♦15 | ok, thanks for your comment. | |
| 68237162 by Jessica12345 @ 2019-03-17 19:30 | 1 | 2019-03-18 08:13 | Carnildo | Are you sure the fire station and the A&W share a building? |
| 2 | 2019-03-18 17:43 | Jessica12345 ♦15 | No, it's supposed to be with the KFC across the street, thanks for catching that. I'll fix it asap | |
| 68189906 by Glassman @ 2019-03-15 21:17 | 1 | 2019-03-16 07:28 | Carnildo | You sure about that curve on Portola Court? The old, straight road looks like a better match to the Bing and Esri imagery. |
| 2 | 2019-03-16 15:10 | Glassman ♦5,217 | Your right - fixed | |
| 68153971 by opiummonke @ 2019-03-14 22:10 | 1 | 2019-03-15 08:48 | Carnildo | Pretty sure that the entire lake doesn't count as a swimming area. |
| 68153351 by opiummonke @ 2019-03-14 21:45 | 1 | 2019-03-15 08:44 | Carnildo | "Secondary road" is meant for relatively major roads -- ones almost as important as US-2 -- not driveways. |
| 68117413 by Jessica12345 @ 2019-03-13 22:48 | 1 | 2019-03-15 06:37 | Carnildo | The "HVAC" tag is used for business that provide HVAC design, installation or maintenance services.For tagging an individual machine, it looks like "man_made=hvac_unit" is the best option, but it doesn't have a preset. Instead, you'll need to add the tag manually, ... |
| 68072313 by edenhw @ 2019-03-12 18:02 | 1 | 2019-03-14 07:57 | Carnildo | In addition to whatever you were trying to do in Edmonton you pulled sections of footpath across the map in China and Calgary. Please be more careful with your editing in the future. |
| 2 | 2019-03-16 03:40 | clarecorthell ♦4 | Wow, my apologies. This looks like the equivalent of a butt dial; I will do my absolute best not to do something like this again. | |
| 3 | 2019-03-16 03:41 | clarecorthell ♦4 | Actually, this looks like someone gained access to my account. I'll change my passwords and work the problem. Apologies. | |
| 67942339 by Jessica12345 @ 2019-03-08 22:12 | 1 | 2019-03-11 08:03 | Carnildo | Are you sure the various offices you've added here are best described as "tourist information"? I'm not sure how I'd tag them, but that doesn't seem right to me. |
| 2 | 2019-03-11 16:39 | Jessica12345 ♦15 | Ah, no, you're right. I didn't see the "tourism" key, just the information bit, I'll have to be more careful.Hawk Central is where students go to get help with registration, financial aid, and various other things. | |
| 3 | 2019-03-11 16:48 | Jessica12345 ♦15 | Ah, yeah I should have read the documentation for "Information". I didn't realize it would revert back to "Tourist Information" when I saved, but it's the wrong tag regardless.If you don't know what it should be I'll keep looking. Do you think "Educat... | |
| 4 | 2019-03-12 03:39 | Carnildo | "Educational Institution" offices seems reasonable. It at least seems like it's in the correct general category ("office"). | |
| 5 | 2019-03-12 04:02 | Jessica12345 ♦15 | Okay, should be fixed with changeset 68046761.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68046761 | |
| 67936441 by Spark1815 @ 2019-03-08 19:27 | 1 | 2019-03-08 23:22 | Carnildo | Please don't put descriptions into the "name" field like you've done here. Computers tend to be rather literal-minded, and will see this as being a building named "Vacant". |
| 67480218 by Jessica12345 @ 2019-02-22 20:52 | 1 | 2019-02-25 02:13 | Carnildo | Please don't glue parking lots to buildings like you've done here. Most parking lots don't actually run right up against buildings, and it's a pain to fix it if you need to, for example, add a bike rack between the building and the parking lot. |
| 67109758 by Evilscaught @ 2019-02-11 18:49 | 1 | 2019-02-12 08:35 | Carnildo | There's one more thing you can do to indicate that it's a private laundry: add the "access=private" tag.You'll need to do this manually: with the building selected, click the "All tags" label at the bottom of the left-hand panel to expand it, click the plus sig... |
| 2 | 2019-02-12 23:03 | Evilscaught ♦5 | Thanks Carnildo! | |
| 67079643 by wislander @ 2019-02-10 18:48 | 1 | 2019-02-11 05:54 | Carnildo | The best imagery in the Spokane County area is "Esri World Imagery". It's newer, sharper, and better-aligned than anything else. |
| 2 | 2019-02-12 01:02 | wislander ♦30 | Thanks for the heads up! I was editing in Vespucci, so I couldn't be very precise, but I'm planning on going back over my changes in JOSM this week and improving the building outlines. I also have a bunch of address and level details saved as an .osc that I'll upload at that point. | |
| 66982114 by ncflagg @ 2019-02-07 03:04 | 1 | 2019-02-07 07:25 | Carnildo | Where are you getting these speed limits from? In my experience, freeway off-ramps almost never have speed limits, and and rapid-fire speed limit changes like you've added to Appleway are nearly as rare. |
| 2 | 2019-02-07 19:24 | ncflagg ♦1 | They're not the actual posted speed limits, as you suspect. I was testing an idea for openpilot to automatically slow down my car for stops signs. I may have broken an OSM rule or two, sorry.Is there a way to mark street signs? | |
| 3 | 2019-02-07 20:15 | Minh Nguyen ♦562 | These references may be helpful:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=stophttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:advisoryhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer | |
| 4 | 2019-02-07 20:25 | ncflagg ♦1 | Thanks!Would setting maxspeed:advisory be kosher or does that also fall under 'Tagging for the renderer' if the signs don't actually exist? | |
| 5 | 2019-02-07 21:51 | Carnildo | If the signs don't exist, don't tag as if they did. Advisory speeds on exit ramps are reasonably common, but I'm pretty sure exit 299 doesn't have one -- I didn't map it as having one, and I've got pretty good coverage of I-90 between Spokane and Butte. | |
| 6 | 2019-02-07 22:47 | ncflagg ♦1 | Can I not undo these changes via web browser? | |
| 7 | 2019-02-07 23:45 | Carnildo | The easy way would be for someone to use the JOSM "revert changeset" tool. If nobody else does it first, I'll get to it in a few hours. | |
| 8 | 2019-02-08 04:49 | Carnildo | And reverted. | |
| 66902014 by mikefarrelly @ 2019-02-04 12:34 | 1 | 2019-02-06 05:04 | Carnildo | Are you sure the gas station you added to Goodsprings is in the right place? I'm not seeing anything gas-station-like in the aerial imagery, and it doesn't fit the usual pattern of where people build gas stations. |
| 66888547 by Evilscaught @ 2019-02-03 23:09 | 1 | 2019-02-05 10:38 | Carnildo | The "apartment complex" tag is meant to go around the entire area - buildings, parking, garages, lawn, and all. There's also an "apartment building" tag for the actual building. |
| 2 | 2019-02-05 18:45 | Evilscaught ♦5 | Thank you for informing me and fixing that mistake, I'll keep that in mind for future edits!Best,Scott. | |
| 66883578 by Quinoaca @ 2019-02-03 18:42 | 1 | 2019-02-05 10:17 | Carnildo | I've only got one or maybe two pictures of the large open area of Holmberg from my last visit, but they show it as being grass-covered rather than heath-like. |
| 66814343 by Brittney Wimberly @ 2019-01-31 20:51 | 1 | 2019-02-01 09:34 | Carnildo | Please don't abbreviate names. It's easy for a computer to create an abbreviation if it needs to save space, but almost impossible to expand an already-abbreviated one. For example, should "ST" be expanded to "Street", "Saint", or "State"? |
| 2 | 2019-02-01 12:54 | Brittney Wimberly ♦1 | Sorry about that, did not even think. Will do for all futurue changes | |
| 66742356 by US Woods @ 2019-01-29 15:42 Active block | 1 | 2019-01-30 01:24 | Carnildo | I don't suppose you could do this on a smaller scale, perhaps state-by-state? It would make it easier to double-check things. |
| 66716644 by TRUERyersonGEO441 @ 2019-01-28 19:50 | 1 | 2019-01-29 00:06 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!I noticed you removed a police station in Toronto. If the building is still present, the best way to indicate that it's no longer a police station is to re-tag it as a plain "building". |
| 2 | 2019-01-29 01:59 | alester ♦187 | The Salt Spring Saturday Market doesn't have a permanent building, so I removed the building tag and fixed the opening_hours | |
| 66669642 by Jessica12345 @ 2019-01-27 05:49 | 1 | 2019-01-27 08:50 | Carnildo | I don't know if you're aware of it or not, but there's a quick way to make good-looking building outlines: once you're done tracing and tagging a building, you can highlight it and hit the "S" key to square the corners up. It makes it easy to get precise right-angled c... |
| 2 | 2019-01-27 20:28 | Jessica12345 ♦15 | I was not aware of that, thank you! I will make sure to use that feature in the future, and when I have a chance I'll go through and clean up the work I've done so far. | |
| 66554307 by Evilscaught @ 2019-01-23 00:13 | 1 | 2019-01-24 10:41 | Carnildo | When you're adding parking lots, please don't glue them to buildings like you did here. Even if it looks like they run up against each other, it usually turns out, when better imagery becomes available, that they don't. |
| 2 | 2019-01-24 17:26 | Evilscaught ♦5 | Fixed! I've been avoiding glueing parking lots to buildings like the contributor before me did, thanks for pointing that out. | |
| 66492211 by LucasLarson @ 2019-01-21 04:23 | 1 | 2019-01-21 08:43 | Carnildo | When I drove through there a couple years ago, MT-200 left the interstate at exit 109, not exit 107. Has that changed? |
| 2 | 2019-01-21 22:57 | LucasLarson ♦3 | You’re right — thanks for your kind attention to it! That road is now “OLD MT 200”. See https://web.archive.org/web/20190101185215id_/mdt.mt.gov/other/WebData/external/Planning/maps/urban/fc_internet/MISSOULA_FC.PDFI’ll repair it! | |
| 3 | 2019-01-21 23:01 | LucasLarson ♦3 | Done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66520910 | |
| 66350836 by Adam Schneider @ 2019-01-16 04:04 | 1 | 2019-01-16 10:44 | Carnildo | What imagery did you use for the North Spokane Costco? The most recent I'm aware of (ESRI) just shows a construction site, not the details you've added. |
| 2 | 2019-01-16 16:50 | Adam Schneider ♦56 | Spokane County GIS photos, plus a copy of the site plan that I found online. | |
| 66314999 by Michael (OSM) @ 2019-01-14 21:29 | 1 | 2019-01-16 09:12 | Carnildo | Welcome to OSM!When you're adding a road to the map, make sure it's connected to the other roads. You can tell this by the presence of a small grey dot at the point of crossing. I've fixed the north end of this alley, but it's something to keep in mind in the future. |
| 66267132 by Howpper @ 2019-01-13 07:48 | 1 | 2019-01-13 10:19 | Carnildo | I'm not aware of any law that states that you're not allowed to turn from one dead-end street to another. For that matter, I'm not aware of any law that makes a "Dead End" sign anything but an advisory notification.Could you point out where in the Revised Code of Washin... |
| 66112736 by opiummonke @ 2019-01-07 23:57 | 1 | 2019-01-08 09:12 | Carnildo | A couple of mapping tips:1) Once you've drawn something, you can square up the corners to a perfect 90 degrees by right-clicking on it and selecting "Square" from the menu, or by hitting the "S" key.2) You can change which background imagery you're using by clic... |
| 66058596 by Quinoaca @ 2019-01-05 22:16 | 1 | 2019-01-06 07:30 | Carnildo | Are you using an imagery offset? These building outlines are consistently about seven feet southeast of where unadjusted imagery puts them. |
| 2 | 2019-01-06 22:35 | Quinoaca ♦1 | Yes. Offset: 2.00; -2.50 | |
| 3 | 2019-01-06 23:47 | freebeer ♦1,598 | ugh, i wouldn't...in a quick look, the original vintage z19 clarity aligns close enough with newer esri and the new mapbox here that i would consider either of them good enough.the rest are not even worth looking at or i'd try a z20 bing, but it is not to be. (i see the residential ... | |
| 4 | 2019-01-07 19:45 | Carnildo | Esri claims a maximum imagery alignment error for the urban parts of Spokane County of no more than 0.4 meters: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=c03a526d94704bfb839445e80de95495, and comparing against Strava heatmap data says they're right. | |
| 66009901 by ti-lo @ 2019-01-04 04:47 | 1 | 2019-01-04 12:25 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | This change appears to have lost the information that the shop offers inspections and oil change. |
| 2 | 2019-01-04 15:26 | ti-lo ♦84 | IMHO there's no car:repair which does NOT offer this ("yes" means "the full stack") ? In case a shop ONLY offers it you could use car:repair=service;oil_change. But this is currently being discussed :https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-January/041799.htm... | |
| 3 | 2019-01-05 05:02 | Carnildo | In your experience, perhaps, "car repair" inherently implies oil changes. But I'm aware of one "car repair" shop that *only* does transmission rebuilds, and a number of body shops that aren't even able to handle oil or other fluids.Further, almost all car-repair sh... | |
| 4 | 2019-01-05 15:17 | ti-lo ♦84 | car:repair=transmission_rebuild would be fine ?car:bodywork=yes also ?This reduces the number of "phantasy" tags and makes it more traceable as well for apps and for humans (taginfo/overpass). Additionally, this is the 4th "namespace system" for vehicles. Imagine (or search f... | |
| 5 | 2019-01-06 19:52 | Carnildo | You're missing my point: the previous tagging carried more information than the current one does. | |
| 6 | 2019-01-06 21:47 | ti-lo ♦84 | service:vehicle:car_repair \tyesservice:vehicle:inspection \tyesservice:vehicle:oil_change \tyesservice:vehicle:repairsI see what you mean, but IMHO everything is included in "repair" ?Or are there wirkshops which offer repair, but no oil change and inspection ?Please also ... | |
| 66035372 by opiummonke @ 2019-01-04 21:52 | 1 | 2019-01-04 22:18 | Carnildo | Please don't add things to the map if they don't exist.If you're trying to attract Pokemon, natural features such as woods, streams, and ponds are always a good bet, and I see a number of those nearby that haven't yet been mapped. |
| 65819799 by nhanway @ 2018-12-27 17:39 | 1 | 2018-12-28 07:44 | Carnildo | "cycleway=shared_lane" should only be used when there are actual lane markings indicating that a lane is used by both bicycles and automobiles: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shared_lane |
| 65819218 by nhanway @ 2018-12-27 17:19 | 1 | 2018-12-28 07:28 | Carnildo | I'm not sure how useful it is to add "bicycle=yes" to most of these roads. The default for routing in the USA (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#United_States_of_America) is that bicycles are permitted on everything except footways and motor... |
| 65791020 by nhanway @ 2018-12-26 17:31 | 1 | 2018-12-26 22:25 | Carnildo | If you're editing in Spokane County, I recommend using Esri World Imagery. It's far sharper than DigitalGlobe Premium, and nearly as new (I think the difference is only a few weeks). |
| 65724492 by PMojito @ 2018-12-23 20:56 | 1 | 2018-12-24 04:47 | Carnildo | It looks to me like Otis Orchards is already mapped, a bit to the southeast of where you've placed it. |
| 2 | 2018-12-24 17:39 | PMojito ♦1 | I see what you're referring to. But when searching for addresses nearby, they are showing up in "Tolido", Washington. Apparently there is an object nearby (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/150941531) that is acting as the city/town for this area. I'm not sure why. As a proo... | |
| 3 | 2018-12-24 21:15 | Carnildo | I've changed "Tolido" to a "locality", which should remove it from the address-lookup system. | |
| 4 | 2018-12-29 17:58 | PMojito ♦1 | Thank you, Carnildo! :) Happy New Year! | |
| 65548976 by wambacher @ 2018-12-17 12:47 | 1 | 2018-12-18 08:13 | Carnildo | I don't know about Reese Technology Center or the farm in Spain, but Mountain View Cemetery was tagged as "boundary=administrative" because the cemetery is a disconnected part of Davenport. |
| 65541616 by Howpper @ 2018-12-17 08:15 | 1 | 2018-12-18 05:58 | Carnildo | Was removing "surface=asphalt" from the south end of Iron Court intentional? |