25or6to4 have been discussed with 19 replies of this contributor25or6to4 have been discussed with 19 replies of this contributor| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 165922611 by 25or6to4 @ 2025-05-07 06:47 | 1 | 2025-05-08 16:36 | jcarlson ♦113 | thanks for cleaning that up! just be careful, you deleted a legitimate address point. already fixed, and not a big deal. thanks again! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165922611 |
| 51651350 by 25or6to4 @ 2017-09-01 17:51 | 1 | 2024-12-06 13:04 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520616664building=trackWhat is that supposed to indicate? Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group |
| 157399431 by 25or6to4 @ 2024-10-03 01:12 | 1 | 2024-10-16 21:46 | rivermont ♦221 | Do you have a dataset of the cemetery names you are using? Just curious where they're coming from |
| 2 | 2024-10-31 13:04 | rivermont ♦221 | bump | |
| 150202302 by 25or6to4 @ 2024-04-19 04:42 | 1 | 2024-04-21 00:14 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,069 | a few of the ways were wrong direction. fixed |
| 130312118 by 25or6to4 @ 2022-12-21 03:00 | 1 | 2024-03-27 05:59 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1717080/history has 3=US:AR key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand... |
| 2 | 2024-03-27 13:52 | 25or6to4 | Sorry, just a typing error on my part. I have fixed it to the correct tagging. | |
| 117210291 by 25or6to4 @ 2022-02-09 16:29 | 1 | 2023-10-01 18:06 | Dimitar155 ♦662 | Hello 25or6to4,Are those two cemeteries separate? They have the same name but the north one also has cemetery=sector which doesn't seem right. Can you check them and fix them if needed?Happy mapping,Dimitar |
| 137491121 by 25or6to4 @ 2023-06-18 19:46 | 1 | 2023-06-19 15:36 | rivermont ♦221 | Are the roads signed TN 331 or SR 331? I can never trust TIGER but haven't driven much of the state only an hour west of me |
| 2 | 2023-06-21 21:31 | 25or6to4 | This one's SR. Uses the triangle signs. | |
| 137314579 by 25or6to4 @ 2023-06-14 07:34 | 1 | 2023-06-14 16:14 | MatthewAndersonUS80 ♦6 | Thank you! |
| 51967887 by 25or6to4 @ 2017-09-12 10:19 | 1 | 2022-10-21 13:28 | SK53 ♦864 | Building heights in this changeset appear to be in feet not metres. A value of height without units defaults to metres. |
| 117849080 by 25or6to4 @ 2022-02-25 13:18 | 1 | 2022-02-27 12:38 | Hohe Schule ♦3 | *highways* |
| 113493558 by 25or6to4 @ 2021-11-07 19:29 | 1 | 2021-11-07 20:46 | Cyber Alert Red ♦4 | Hi 25or6to4,I gladly follow your work, but what's this for a wrong changeset comment?The time before "hashtags" was just better! |
| 2 | 2021-11-07 20:51 | 25or6to4 | Whoops! I had looked at a OMS tasks project briefly. I guess it changed my usual comment! My bad. | |
| 101641517 by 25or6to4 @ 2021-03-24 11:21 | 1 | 2021-03-24 11:25 | Ludhiana ♦42 | Hi 25or6to4,would you tag state parks rather as leisure=park or boundary=protected_area + some protect_class?Best wishes |
| 39707831 by 25or6to4 @ 2016-06-01 10:52 | 1 | 2021-03-21 01:50 | skquinn ♦804 | Re: Colorado River Bridge -- was this marked as access=no due to construction? If so, has the construction been completed? |
| 2 | 2021-03-21 02:05 | 25or6to4 | Yes, both directions drove on the eastern bridge (confirmed as I drove over that specific bridge). The western bridge was getting construction/repairs. I currently can't tell from imagery if it's been completed, or if it will ever be used for vehicular traffic. | |
| 3 | 2021-03-21 02:16 | skquinn ♦804 | Thanks. I'll try to re-survey when I'm out there again (probably a couple of weeks). | |
| 98029918 by 25or6to4 @ 2021-01-23 17:43 | 1 | 2021-01-23 20:45 | Multi-Level ♦9 | New York State is done? Congratulations! |
| 62469667 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-09-10 23:03 | 1 | 2020-12-12 05:07 | user_5359 ♦19,410 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/33153414/history. What is the mean of the tag city=60600 which you add in version 9? |
| 2 | 2020-12-12 07:08 | 25or6to4 | That's a good question. I have no idea where that came from. | |
| 3 | 2020-12-12 07:10 | user_5359 ♦19,410 | Can I clean it up? | |
| 4 | 2020-12-12 07:15 | 25or6to4 | Yes, go ahead | |
| 92654748 by 25or6to4 @ 2020-10-18 12:08 | 1 | 2020-11-06 10:40 | Alan Bragg ♦152 | Looks like the cemetery edit removing the area tag has accidentally changed the adjacent the minuteman bikeway into a cemetery. Please take a look. |
| 2 | 2020-11-06 15:09 | 25or6to4 | Whoops! Looks like I pasted the GNIS data to the wrong area. I have fixed and updated this. Thanks for letting me know! | |
| 87901733 by 25or6to4 @ 2020-07-13 06:16 | 1 | 2020-07-14 07:22 | Carnildo ♦905 | Where did you get the name "Gravel Point Cemetery" from? USGS topo maps call it "Wayside Cemetery", the GNIS node you deleted called it "Wayside Cemetary", and county records say it's run by the "Wayside Cemetery Association". |
| 2 | 2020-07-14 07:35 | 25or6to4 | Looks like it didn't copy the GNIS node correctly, and pasted the previous GNIS node I had copied. I just fixed it. | |
| 82137873 by 25or6to4 @ 2020-03-13 03:16 | 1 | 2020-03-13 03:37 | CamelCaseNick ♦174 | Hey,what are your sources that the bridge is no more part of the NRHP as heritage? And what are the problems with the Wikipedia and Wikidata tags?CamelCaseNick |
| 2 | 2020-03-13 22:24 | 25or6to4 | According to Bridgehunter.com and my research, the bridge was replaced in 1990 or so. Thus the current birdge there is not historic anymore. I removed the Wiki links, since the Wiki refers to the actual historic bridge, not the bridge currently there. | |
| 3 | 2020-03-13 22:37 | CamelCaseNick ♦174 | Okay, Thanks!I just saw the Wikipedia article was written in present. 🤷♂️ | |
| 77970544 by 25or6to4 @ 2019-12-05 05:00 | 1 | 2019-12-05 09:01 | Alhamdulillah ♦34 | Please be more proud and explain your valuable work."#maproulette" is a useless changeset comment since it tells us absolutely nothing about the subject of mapping.And please me forgive me to teach to somebody with ∞ more edits! |
| 63986711 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-10-29 18:03 | 1 | 2019-09-24 13:14 | Horza ♦110 | This is Marion County and you've listed a source for Manatee county? |
| 64860215 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-11-25 07:48 | 1 | 2019-02-12 17:27 | maxerickson ♦234 | It looks like the way here inadvertently got smashed by pressing "o".http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/G2C |
| 2 | 2019-02-12 18:46 | 25or6to4 | Whoops! That's a very nice circle. I have corrected the boundary. Thanks! | |
| 65903223 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-12-31 03:50 | 1 | 2019-01-01 19:12 | b-jazz ♦663 | Another example of a node moved far away from the rest of the way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/84327507 |
| 65898643 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-12-30 21:35 | 1 | 2019-01-01 19:10 | b-jazz ♦663 | Hi 25or6to4. I've seen a similar pattern happen recently with "city boundary" changes that you're making and thought I'd mention it in an attempt to prevent it from happening in the future. Somehow, you are moving the point of an existing way (road/path/etc) when you are mod... |
| 61642643 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-08-14 01:18 | 1 | 2018-12-28 13:52 | wambacher ♦435 | Hi, I don't think, this boundary is ok - but i can't fix it :(may be you can fix that?https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2018/marion_usa.png"Multipolygonlinien überschneiden sich" --> "Overlapping multipolygon lines"Regardswalter/G... |
| 2 | 2018-12-29 21:30 | 25or6to4 | Ok, the boundary has been fixed. There was a landuse:railway boundary that was incorrectly in the Marion multipolygon. I also fixed the adjacent Sunrise boundary for another error. | |
| 3 | 2018-12-31 10:34 | wambacher ♦435 | thanks. | |
| 65687308 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-12-22 08:06 | 1 | 2018-12-23 04:02 | b-jazz ♦663 | It looks like whatever change you made to the boundary has created 100+ duplicate nodes. For instance, check out https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6152983910 which sits at the same location as two other nodes. If you look at that boundary, there are 110 duplicate node errors according to JOSM. Shou... |
| 2 | 2018-12-23 05:28 | 25or6to4 | I went ahead and cleaned up the duplicated nodes. It's happened a couple times, but it wasn't from the initial import data set, so I'm trying to chase down the cause.. If you notice any others, let me know, and I'll fix them up. | |
| 3 | 2018-12-23 18:42 | b-jazz ♦663 | Thanks for cleaning it up. If I spot another case of it, I'll let you know. | |
| 65452196 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-12-13 19:16 | 1 | 2018-12-13 22:36 | neuhausr ♦331 | Thanks for your work updating boundaries. Would you mind including a more specific source link though? The Geospatial Commons has hundreds of datasets. |
| 65221766 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-12-06 00:26 | 1 | 2018-12-08 00:28 | b-jazz ♦663 | Hi there Robert Lamm. Are you aware that the nodes that make up some of these boundaries are stacked on top of each other at least 6+ times? At least for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652979075, there are many nodes that occupy the same centimeter of space. Is that something you can clean up? |
| 2 | 2018-12-08 00:46 | 25or6to4 | Wow! The validator didn't catch that. I'll start working on that now. I'll keep a closer eye on the rest of these as well. | |
| 64427055 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-11-13 02:49 | 1 | 2018-11-14 23:30 | NotJim99 ♦5 | As a local, I think I know my town's boundaries better than TIGER. I wish you had at least contacted me first before replacing my contributions with this mess. |
| 2 | 2018-11-15 00:30 | 25or6to4 | I'm sorry for your frustration. Yes, this upload was a complete loss of accuracy and shouldn't have happened. I have fully reverted the update and restored the previous boundary. Check changeset 64508024. | |
| 3 | 2018-11-15 00:40 | NotJim99 ♦5 | Thank you. | |
| 64365291 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-11-11 01:11 | 1 | 2018-11-13 06:39 | Howpper ♦121 | Why did you mess up the city limits? |
| 62231704 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-09-02 23:47 | 1 | 2018-09-04 11:46 | glglgl ♦274 | Again me, again with the same issue: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34121637 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34121638 overlap each other. |
| 2 | 2018-09-04 12:08 | 25or6to4 | Got it, thanks! All fixed. | |
| 62028913 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-08-27 06:57 | 1 | 2018-08-29 09:32 | glglgl ♦274 | Hi, it's me again. Could you have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/128381 again? There seems to be another overlap, created by changing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34121641. Note that the relation already contains an inner way which cuts out a part of the town. |
| 2 | 2018-08-29 11:51 | 25or6to4 | Found it and fixed it. Thanks for catching that! | |
| 60684524 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-07-13 11:04 | 1 | 2018-08-02 11:56 | glglgl ♦274 | Could you please verify these changes? By moving some of these points, you made relation 114487 overlap itself. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/114487 for details: in the south east, around "Brian Place", the two parts of the multipolygon overlap each other now. |
| 2 | 2018-08-03 04:11 | 25or6to4 | Thanks for catching that. I doublechecked the boundary and realigned it properly with a single polygon. | |
| 60808247 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-07-17 17:19 | 1 | 2018-07-19 04:42 | user_5359 ♦19,410 | Hello! The three ways http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608696965,http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608696966, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608702136 have only uppercase keys (not wanted in OSM) like CITY=UGCEMS=SEGUIN EMSFIRE=NEW BERLIN VFD (FR)OBJECTID=192POLICE=GUADALUPE CO. SHERIFF... |
| 60110535 by 25or6to4 @ 2018-06-23 23:50 | 1 | 2018-06-24 03:56 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,117 | Found the split in the curve to the new name. Also found the extension. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60110535 |
| 51901293 by 25or6to4 @ 2017-09-10 08:49 | 1 | 2017-09-11 15:07 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello 25or6to4, at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523224923 you have introduced a new key `Municipal`, what is that? #newkey |
| 2 | 2017-09-12 11:51 | 25or6to4 | Glitch on my part from copying tags from the previous marina shape. It was supposed to be part of the name. I fixed it. | |
| 48051815 by 25or6to4 @ 2017-04-23 07:08 | 1 | 2017-05-24 06:05 | woodpeck ♦2,430 | Hello 25or6to4, it appears that you're importing data from an NRHP data set in this and other similar change sets. Could you please ensure that the import is properly documented on the Wiki (I checked and at least it didn't seem obvious), and that you specify proper sources when making the... |
| 46911425 by 25or6to4 @ 2017-03-16 21:42 | 1 | 2017-03-17 15:44 | RichRico ♦81 | Thanks for contributing with OSM.Could you please share the image source you used to make this editions?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442047564 |
| 2 | 2017-03-17 17:01 | 25or6to4 | Imagery used was the Texas Orthoimagery from TNRIS, available through JOSM. | |
| 46293136 by 25or6to4 @ 2017-02-22 02:47 | 1 | 2017-02-22 06:33 | manoharuss ♦252 | Hi 25or6to4,May I suggest smaller bbox approach in uploading edits.Thanks,Manohar |
| 39022442 by 25or6to4 @ 2016-05-01 18:00 | 1 | 2017-02-02 15:45 | yurasi ♦87 | Hi 25or6to4.Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you've deleted several roads that were import. It would be great if you can let the community know the reason behind removing these features from the map. I think that you had would aligned these roads instead of deleted. Check al... |