Mateusz Konieczny participated in the following changeset discussionsMateusz Konieczny participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 160688730 by Władysław Komorek @ 2024-12-27 18:52 | 1 | 2025-06-06 03:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12368283646/historyw te edycji z https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12368283646/history zniknęło name=Tadeusz Malakjeszcze samo usunięcie name rozumiem, ale wtedy jest do zastąpienia przez subject/inscriptionpoprawisz? |
| 2 | 2025-06-06 09:33 | Władysław Komorek ♦93 | Jest. Razem z Piotrem i Krystyną. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-06 09:39 | Władysław Komorek ♦93 | https://dotevo.github.io/gravemap-osm/#12/50.0472/20.0548 | |
| 4 | 2025-06-06 09:42 | Władysław Komorek ♦93 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12368283646#map=19/50.051929/19.904428 | |
| 5 | 2025-07-02 17:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | to czy https://dotevo.github.io/gravemap-osm/#12/50.0472/20.0548 wyświetla coś czy nie - nie ma znaczenia dla tego czy ta edycja miała senskasowanie name bez zastąpienia na tym obiekcie nie jest OKpoprawisz? | |
| 6 | 2025-07-02 18:44 | Władysław Komorek ♦93 | Nie. I nic nie zmieniaj bo schrzanisz czytelność całego cmentarza.Jeśli zamierzasz zmienić to musisz to zrobić globalnie dla wszystkich grobów.Zapoznaj się wcześniej z dyskusją z 2012 roku jaki był cel opisywania grobów.Wyobraź sobie przeciętny cmentarz z kilku tysią... | |
| 7 | 2025-07-02 18:49 | Władysław Komorek ♦93 | Jeśli ja usunę swoje edycje, które według ciebie są złe, to ten cmentarz i Rokowiecki będą puste.Będziesz miał wtedy możliwość ponanosić wszystkie groby po swojemu. | |
| 136083531 by mcliquid @ 2023-05-14 12:35 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10895948730/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-07-02 17:26 | mcliquid ♦1,852 | Interesting, Every Door must have set it up that way automatically back then; at least, it wasn't intentional on my part. Here is a “stamp spot.” This is common in hiking areas; it's usually a small wooden box with a stamp pad for signing your hiking logbook.When I look it up... | |
| 3 | 2025-07-02 17:31 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880 was at least partially fixed since then, but https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=fixme still grows steadily whenever I have less time to make such changeset comments | |
| 4 | 2025-07-02 17:37 | Mateusz Konieczny | and thanks for a fix and a quick response! | |
| 152717377 by CHANDANA RAJA SRI PASUPULETI @ 2024-06-15 11:45 | 1 | 2025-07-02 16:47 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11982765216/history has fixme:type = pond that was added in this editthat would be natural=water water=pond - right? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:water%3Dpond |
| 148236926 by ph4ni @ 2024-03-05 07:34 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11693232226/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-07-02 14:05 | ph4ni ♦7 | It is a cold storage to store Chilli produce | |
| 3 | 2025-07-02 15:44 | Mateusz Konieczny | I retagged asamenity=warehousecheck_date=2024-03-05description=It is a cold storage to store Chilli produceand mapped building | |
| 167963453 by LuluMOB @ 2025-06-22 15:19 | 1 | 2025-07-02 10:00 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173489587/history#map=19/46.965997/26.987689&layers=N - so construction tag can be removed now, right?probably also note tag |
| 2 | 2025-07-02 13:26 | LuluMOB ♦1 | I considerthat both are not anymore needed. | |
| 3 | 2025-07-02 15:42 | Mateusz Konieczny | will you remove them? | |
| 167778214 by Midmere @ 2025-06-18 11:36 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:46 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12923056852/history - czyli po prostu parking? |
| 166867785 by ziemiakosmos12 @ 2025-05-28 10:05 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:46 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12870704621/history - w sensie że można kupić/wymienić zbiorniki z gazem?magazyn gazu jakiegoś domu?przemysłowy magazyn gazu?coś innego? |
| 167210571 by xraus @ 2025-06-05 08:21 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:37 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12888261928/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 165830440 by Engelhaft @ 2025-05-05 07:10 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:37 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12811113113/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 163834657 by MaiersMichl @ 2025-03-19 20:11 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:36 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12682159571/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 167142445 by schumi1234 @ 2025-06-03 16:09 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:35 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12883878568/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-07-02 15:01 | schumi1234 ♦2 | Hi!https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FriedhofmappingI tried following this wiki site (german)."Karrenverleih: rental=??? (Proposal)" - got me stuck.It is a bar with about 5 trolleys, which you can borrow | |
| 167319846 by lephotographe0769 @ 2025-06-07 17:06 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:30 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12895328524/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 166469045 by jlgay38 @ 2025-05-19 10:36 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:28 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12848645217/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 166394923 by Thierry 38780 @ 2025-05-17 14:37 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:28 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12844242935/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 160613709 by Ancap-chan @ 2024-12-25 18:45 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | that would be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Danimal_shelter - right? |
| 143240977 by Pansforest @ 2023-10-28 04:52 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:25 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11294696744/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 149973199 by GOwin @ 2024-04-14 00:03 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:25 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11815626675/history would be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dgate - right? |
| 2 | 2025-07-02 23:54 | GOwin ♦852 | Yeah, thanks! | |
| 138010036 by CloCkWeRX @ 2023-07-02 03:04 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11018950280/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 140407402 by AnuradhaRajanayake @ 2023-08-26 11:23 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11145985418/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 135335351 by UMUGANWA YVES @ 2023-04-25 09:47 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:19 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10839354373/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 137479909 by mstara kificho msirani @ 2023-06-18 14:03 | 1 | 2025-07-02 12:40 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10984108998/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 154408886 by rui228 @ 2024-07-25 19:17 | 1 | 2025-07-02 11:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12074002483/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 133917644 by countrymouse @ 2023-03-20 22:24 | 1 | 2025-07-02 11:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10749513080/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 167711835 by ugackMiner @ 2025-06-16 20:19 | 1 | 2025-07-02 11:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12920074068/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-07-02 19:11 | ugackMiner ♦1 | Honestly, I couldn't tell when standing in front of it. The only thing there is a door marked as "Compass Medical Technologies" with no other information. I assume that it's some form of medical treatment service similar to the other buildings in the area, but I couldn't fin... | |
| 123208979 by skquinn @ 2022-07-04 21:46 | 1 | 2025-07-02 11:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9866926499/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-07-02 12:17 | skquinn ♦804 | Oops. Should have been a Chevron fuel station. Fixed. | |
| 158757939 by cincodenada @ 2024-11-04 21:43 | 1 | 2025-07-02 11:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12312861297/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 136100845 by Michel_Beavogui @ 2023-05-14 20:50 | 1 | 2025-07-02 11:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10897234924/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 138859299 by Ussumane Embalo @ 2023-07-22 15:24 | 1 | 2025-07-02 11:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11061802024/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 168381291 by YomanNH @ 2025-07-02 06:04 | 1 | 2025-07-02 10:30 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zglaszanie-i-prosby-o-sprawdzenie-kont-edycji-uzytkownikow/110854/209 |
| 15110791 by sobzeros @ 2013-02-21 11:23 | 1 | 2025-07-02 07:53 | Mateusz Konieczny | can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4834847 ? |
| 96330461 by oruk09 @ 2020-12-23 13:49 | 1 | 2025-07-02 07:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4834213 ? |
| 168364562 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-07-01 17:41 | 1 | 2025-07-01 17:42 | Mateusz Konieczny | z https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4305120 |
| 114705654 by kellyyyy @ 2021-12-08 14:22 | 1 | 2025-07-01 17:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150175368/history - is it still under construction? |
| 167329971 by andrewpmk @ 2025-06-07 22:41 | 1 | 2025-07-01 17:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6535127757/history - should remains of Starbucks tags be removed here?maybe Every Door should be also fixed? |
| 159075898 by freeExec @ 2024-11-13 04:52 | 1 | 2025-06-14 11:50 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12336260863/history has fixme:type = дезинфектор that was added in this editIs it an attempt to map hand disinfector? Something else? |
| 2 | 2025-06-22 08:01 | freeExec ♦628 | Нет, там находится фирма, которая занимается дезинфекцией (трафит тараканов и мышей в подвалах домов например) | |
| 3 | 2025-06-22 16:14 | Mateusz Konieczny | Os it their internal office where only employees go in? And can client walk in to setup home visit to remove pests? | |
| 4 | 2025-06-26 06:52 | freeExec ♦628 | Там сидит менеджер, который принимает заявки от клиентов. Возможно, действительно это можно отметить через office, а не как услугу. | |
| 5 | 2025-07-01 08:00 | Mateusz Konieczny | I changed amenity=fixme to office=customer_serviceI have not touched fixme:type | |
| 155484951 by LySioS @ 2024-08-19 23:01 | 1 | 2025-06-30 13:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | Is it G20 or Carrefour Contact ?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474539168/history |
| 2 | 2025-06-30 13:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | Or is it somehow both at the same time with dual-branding or something?Or maybe G20 is name of this specific Carrefour? | |
| 3 | 2025-06-30 21:31 | LySioS ♦125 | G20 is the old name, every door just changed the name but forgot the brand,It's fixed | |
| 4 | 2025-07-01 07:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | Thanks! (it may be worth reporting as problem to ED maintainer if it still does this) | |
| 168318807 by X86355 @ 2025-06-30 16:50 | 1 | 2025-07-01 05:20 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you explain why?Note that people tried to contact you in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167932088 |
| 2 | 2025-07-01 11:17 | X86355 ♦1 | Route doesn't carry long-distance traffic east of Selma. | |
| 143585935 by Makpal88 @ 2023-11-03 18:03 | 1 | 2025-06-30 17:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177666970/history has building = 25 that was added in this editWhat this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means |
| 139300970 by vootza @ 2023-08-01 13:31 | 1 | 2025-06-30 17:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193761978/history has building = 25 that was added in this editWhat this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means |
| 163958892 by ExoticApple57 @ 2025-03-22 18:06 | 1 | 2025-06-30 14:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4832472 ?Now way is marked as cycleway not allowing bicycles |
| 154763722 by track_manuel @ 2024-08-03 08:26 | 1 | 2025-06-30 14:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4832466 ? You added cycleway tags to way not allowing bicycles which seems likely some sort of mistake |
| 150750316 by TheBizii @ 2024-05-01 13:18 | 1 | 2025-06-30 14:38 | Mateusz Konieczny | can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4832467 ? |
| 94788021 by KSMedia @ 2020-11-25 16:31 | 1 | 2025-06-30 14:37 | Mateusz Konieczny | can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4832464 ? |
| 168076620 by Sykkel (Ossfin) @ 2025-06-25 05:43 | 1 | 2025-06-30 14:36 | Mateusz Konieczny | I removed also healthcare=pharmacy if it is closed (otherwise you have contradictory tagging, it could be also prefixed instead)yes, this double tagging with healthcare=pharmacy mess is a bad idea |
| 2 | 2025-06-30 19:08 | Sykkel (Ossfin) ♦3 | thx, I have overlooked the 2nd tag | |
| 163497823 by Josh546378 @ 2025-03-11 18:36 | 1 | 2025-06-30 14:18 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4832435 ? |
| 87472683 by Cokebreeze @ 2020-07-02 22:36 | 1 | 2025-06-30 14:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4832436 ? |
| 168176915 by Palgrave Peter @ 2025-06-27 09:51 | 1 | 2025-06-30 13:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4832379 ? It looks like a typo, with stile=ga to be simply deleted |
| 136130364 by Szymson @ 2023-05-15 14:42 | 1 | 2025-06-30 07:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | Nowa Kielnieńska - sa podstawy jakieś by to highway=proposed trzymać?Są to realne plany?https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/naduzywanie-highway-proposed/132015/3 |
| 2 | 2025-06-30 09:07 | Szymson ♦366 | No raczej nikt bez powodu węzła Chwaszczyno nie budował z wyprowadzonymi jezdniami pod Nową Kielnieńską. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-30 13:02 | Mateusz Konieczny | są przypadki węzłów mających kikuty donikąd przez dekady lub takie gdzie plany początkowe nijak się miały do końcowychwęc pytanie nie jest czy kiedyś serio plany były a czy są teraz serio w takiej formie | |
| 4 | 2025-06-30 14:01 | Szymson ♦366 | Tutaj są dostępne najnowsze informacje na ten temat. W skrócie: Powiat Kartuski chce jak najszybciej podłączyć Węzeł Chwaszczyno do ul. Oliwskiej (DW218 która wkrótce będzie zdegradowana do drogi powiatowej):https://expresskaszubski.pl/pl/11_wiadomosci/68519_odcinek-om... | |
| 5 | 2025-07-01 14:14 | Szymson ♦366 | Tu artykuł z dzisiaj:https://www.gdynia.pl/mieszkaniec/co-nowego,2774/samorzady-wspolnie-wybuduja-lacznice-nowej-obwodnicy,589778#poczatekbudowyBudowa łącznika do ul. Oliwskiej ma ruszyć w przyszłym roku | |
| 138433901 by Szymson @ 2023-07-12 18:14 | 1 | 2025-06-30 07:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | Jak na razie nawet wariantu nie wybrano to jest za wcześnie na dodawanie czegokolwiek do OSM, nawet jako highway=proposed |
| 37682549 by przemas75 @ 2016-03-08 09:44 | 1 | 2025-06-30 07:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | Nowa Kielnieńska - sa podstawy jakieś by to highway=proposed trzymać?Są to realne plany?https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/naduzywanie-highway-proposed/132015/3 |
| 76332234 by MrWebber @ 2019-10-29 08:59 | 1 | 2025-06-30 07:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | Nowa Kielnieńska - sa podstawy jakieś by to highway=proposed trzymać?Są to realne plany?https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/naduzywanie-highway-proposed/132015/3 |
| 116633627 by Marek-M @ 2022-01-26 18:26 | 1 | 2025-06-30 07:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | Nowa Kielnieńska - sa podstawy jakieś by to highway=proposed trzymać?Są to realne plany?https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/naduzywanie-highway-proposed/132015/3 |
| 2 | 2025-06-30 21:55 | Marek-M ♦900 | Tego nie wiem i nie śledzę. Tutaj tylko aktualizowałem część tej drogi proposed zgodnie z projektem, który został już zrealizowany a pozostała część była wrysowana dużo wcześniej (9 lat przed moją edycją - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183552640/history ). | |
| 155253315 by theDM @ 2024-08-14 18:00 | 1 | 2025-06-30 07:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | Nowa Kielnieńska - sa podstawy jakieś by to highway=proposed trzymać?Są to realne plany?https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/naduzywanie-highway-proposed/132015/3 |
| 2 | 2025-07-01 17:53 | theDM ♦84 | https://www.gdansk.pl/wiadomosci/Bedzie-specjalny-lacznik-z-Obwodnica-Metropolii-Trojmiasta-Gdansk-dolozy-sie-do-inwestycji-Borawski,a,290875Łącznik, o którym wspominałem na forach. Może czytają moje komentarze :D.W artykule jest wyraźnie zaznaczone, że Nowa Kielnieńska jest odło... | |
| 3 | 2025-07-01 18:01 | theDM ♦84 | rozbudowa Spacerowej przy Auchan i brakujące relacje na węźle Osowa prędzej powstaną, ale to w pewnie przy okazji rozbudowy obwodnicy. | |
| 142984757 by Owlosmoke @ 2023-10-22 19:57 | 1 | 2024-11-26 17:50 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,108 | You were looking for shop=cannabis on Goodies. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142984757 |
| 2 | 2025-06-29 06:44 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11282099664/history = there should be space (" ") between "Marco's" and "Pizza", right?If not - please let me know as I added it | |
| 168146430 by Imadlowiec @ 2025-06-26 15:51 | 1 | 2025-06-28 05:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | jaki jest sens/cel tej edycji?teraz highway=secondary losowo urywa na moście |
| 2 | 2025-06-28 05:40 | Mateusz Konieczny | lu zmiany kategorii istotnych dróg trzeb najpierw na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 zaproponować | |
| 161051016 by Nathan Hadley @ 2025-01-06 10:17 | 1 | 2025-06-27 08:15 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10857565460/history - note that NSI/Osmose should not be blindly trusted, see https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/10390(I fixed this object) |
| 168102421 by kubazazula @ 2025-06-25 15:58 | 1 | 2025-06-25 17:57 | bartgron ♦156 | Czy ta Żabka jest czynna tylko w niedziele? Czy realnie w paczkomacie można płacić kartą/gotówką? |
| 2 | 2025-06-25 18:11 | TranslatorPS ♦29 | Zważywszy na to, że jest to automat DPD (który zresztą na mapie postawiłem ja), stwierdzam, że oczywiście, że nie xDDDD | |
| 3 | 2025-06-25 18:22 | bartgron ♦156 | To usuwam ten tag | |
| 4 | 2025-06-26 05:53 | Mateusz Konieczny | to ja usunę godziny otwarcia z Żabki, pewnie też bubel | |
| 5 | 2025-06-26 07:51 | bartgron ♦156 | Nie usuwaj, tam trzeba dodać na nowo to co on usunął | |
| 6 | 2025-06-26 16:16 | Mateusz Konieczny | jak wiesz które poprawne to dodaj | |
| 167773371 by HyperFlint @ 2025-06-18 09:37 | 1 | 2025-06-26 07:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/993519000brand:wikidata=Q524757 should be probably replaced by brand:wikidata=Q3442874 ? If that is something called Rostic nowSee https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3442874 and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q524757 |
| 168099257 by Marles77 @ 2025-06-25 14:39 | 1 | 2025-06-26 05:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | ale to że jest asfalt to nie oznacza zmianą kategorii drogiinfomacja o nawierchni dajemy do informacji nawierzchni (tag surface) |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 05:56 | Mateusz Konieczny | i dzięki za dodanie informacji o nawierzchni! | |
| 166107962 by Dasc3er @ 2025-05-11 13:09 | 1 | 2025-06-26 05:32 | Mateusz Konieczny | what you meant by fixme:type=viaggu at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12828388873/history ? |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 05:36 | Dasc3er ♦2 | I mistyped in the app - this is a travel agency. | |
| 167816816 by Waldläufer Oberberg @ 2025-06-19 09:33 | 1 | 2025-06-26 02:35 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello!You usedhorse=no-on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57722559/historyHave you maybe meanthorse=no?I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).Or have you used this value deli... |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 09:03 | Waldläufer Oberberg ♦10 | Fixed. Thanks for your hint. | |
| 161067905 by sef43 @ 2025-01-06 17:32 | 1 | 2025-03-24 04:09 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12478950337/history has access:foot = no that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)Would using foot access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot ) be fitting at least equally well?Usage statistics are sometimes wrong an... |
| 2 | 2025-06-25 11:35 | sef43 ♦6 | Would foot=no really be better than access:foot=no? If so, the other access:* tags should be changed too. I think I will change these all.Back when I added this, I didn't have a good enough look at the wiki apparently, usage stats I barely use, because I usually am not able to (short online t... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-25 17:44 | Mateusz Konieczny | access: prefix makes less likely that routers and other data consumers can use them, I would suggest changing them | |
| 168058443 by user2137 @ 2025-06-24 16:48 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-24 19:17 | SpinOff ♦288 | Revertedhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168064156 |
| 2 | 2025-06-25 16:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | "hufrur" - niby co ta edycja miała zrobić? | |
| 168025457 by Fabcio @ 2025-06-24 00:39 | 1 | 2025-06-24 16:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1408942411 - ten kaufland to już otwarty jest? |
| 2 | 2025-06-25 09:09 | Fabcio ♦1 | jaki widać w opisie budynku, jest on w trakcie budowy | |
| 3 | 2025-06-25 13:35 | Mateusz Konieczny | to na shop = supermarket za wcześniejak już to z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix(zmieniłem) | |
| 4 | 2025-06-25 21:34 | Fabcio ♦1 | ok | |
| 159690936 by Marwis00 @ 2024-11-28 08:37 | 1 | 2025-06-25 08:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | skąd to minor_line ? |
| 2 | 2025-06-25 09:04 | Marwis00 ♦35 | bo to linia średniego napięcia | |
| 166080653 by MapleTrees @ 2025-05-10 18:01 | 1 | 2025-06-13 12:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12826217980/history has fixme:type = fix that was added in this editwhat should be fixed here? do you need help with selecting better tags? |
| 2 | 2025-06-13 15:51 | MapleTrees ♦4 | Yeah I wasn't sure how to map it. It's a hair removal place. Most commonly eye brow threading but also other facial hair. I don't know if there's a category specifically for that or if it would be too be some more generic beauty category | |
| 3 | 2025-06-19 10:03 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?search=hair%20removal finds https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:beautyshop=beauty beauty=hair_removal ? | |
| 4 | 2025-06-19 15:56 | MapleTrees ♦4 | I've updated it with those tags. Does it look right now? | |
| 5 | 2025-06-23 22:40 | Mateusz Konieczny | yes, thanks! | |
| 140885956 by canfe @ 2023-09-06 09:15 | 1 | 2025-06-13 15:18 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11171439182/history has fixme:type = bridge that was added in this editIs it an attempt to map a bridge not present in OSM data? Then https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge has info how to do it properly |
| 2 | 2025-06-13 15:19 | Mateusz Konieczny | also, is it separate from already mapped one? | |
| 3 | 2025-06-22 15:04 | canfe ♦1,117 | I apologize for the delay in responding.It was a fixme that I forgot to finish mapping.I have now reduced the dimensions of the bridge to just the deck and specified that it is made of wood. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-22 16:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | so this fixme node can be now deleted, right? | |
| 5 | 2025-06-23 06:36 | canfe ♦1,117 | Yes!! | |
| 167938128 by Adrie Stoopen @ 2025-06-22 05:37 | 1 | 2025-06-22 06:10 | Sylabowy Kot ♦116 | So, where's the source? You are asking yourself for an account block for making false mappings and ignoring alerts, community. |
| 2 | 2025-06-22 06:20 | Sylabowy Kot ♦116 | Reverted because you've ignored us: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167938934Please be aware that polish OSM community is very aware what's happening with country roads. Brinf yourself to the place you belong if you don't even want to write your changeset descriptions in ... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-22 12:44 | Mateusz Konieczny | wysłałem PWjak dalej będzie psuł i ignorował próby kontaktu to pozostaje DWG | |
| 167921128 by Adrie Stoopen @ 2025-06-21 16:24 | 1 | 2025-06-21 17:50 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1330407829/history - what you tried to map with this line? |
| 2 | 2025-06-21 17:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168267230/history - are you sure it is open? if yes, how you know this? | |
| 3 | 2025-06-21 18:11 | Awoobis ♦139 | Reverted. Before uploading please make sure you're uploading correct data. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-21 23:48 | Sylabowy Kot ♦116 | Please don't use just some wiki as the only source of information that such an important road has been opened. It's not even english. People are very strict here about such a highways. | |
| 5 | 2025-06-22 09:52 | Mateusz Konieczny | if nl wiki and OSM disagrees whether road is opened in Poland, then OSM is far more likely to be right(though do not edit wiki without verification either) | |
| 160900297 by redd @ 2025-01-02 10:23 | 1 | 2025-06-21 18:04 | Mateusz Konieczny | Do you know whether this bakery is still closed? |
| 2 | 2025-06-21 19:09 | redd ♦386 | Hi Mateusz,I visited this place half a year ago. The bakery was still looking good but was closed. It was not clear If this closing is temporary or permanent.I therefore made the opening_hours=closed. It dod not look disused or vacant. This kind of closening is happening very often nowadqy... | |
| 167916297 by Azbestcik @ 2025-06-21 14:25 | 1 | 2025-06-21 14:50 | Szymson ♦366 | Dzięki :D |
| 2 | 2025-06-21 17:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168267230/history - czyli to jeszcze nie jest otwarte? | |
| 3 | 2025-06-21 18:44 | Szymson ♦366 | Nie | |
| 167913695 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-06-21 13:18 | 1 | 2025-06-21 13:18 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167584169 |
| 167374365 by rkdclgh @ 2025-06-09 00:29 | 1 | 2025-06-20 22:04 | Mateusz Konieczny | Have you discussed this import with local community?Is it intentional that you mass used an amenity tag not really used before?See https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=retail%20shops#mapwhat is the source of this import and its license?Are you aware of https://wiki.openstr... |
| 2 | 2025-06-20 22:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-innovations-amenity-retail-shops/131654 | |
| 3 | 2025-06-21 01:13 | rkdclgh ♦7 | I did not import any data. I was only correcting address tags for existing features that seemed to have been imported incorrectly in the past.Also, I was not aware of the ongoing discussion regarding this tag. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-21 09:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | Sorry, apparently I am an idiot and wrote on wrong changeset. Sorry! | |
| 5 | 2025-06-21 11:16 | rkdclgh ♦7 | Never mind, thank you for noticing the issue! | |
| 167417106 by FanZandberga @ 2025-06-09 20:28 | 1 | 2025-06-10 08:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | absolutnie nie można kopiować z Google Maps do OSM |
| 2 | 2025-06-10 08:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | Czy jakiekolwiek inne twoje edycje są robione inaczej niż przez kopiowanie z Google Maps? | |
| 3 | 2025-06-20 15:18 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hej, czy jakiekolwiek inne twoje edycje są robione inaczej niż przez kopiowanie z Google Maps? | |
| 4 | 2025-06-20 16:52 | FanZandberga ♦2 | tak, używam StreetComplete i czasami do korygowania mapy JOSMa. nie wiedziałem, że takie rzeczy są niedozwolone | |
| 121629317 by jmapb @ 2022-05-28 18:58 | 1 | 2025-06-20 10:28 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8180092625/history has shop = car_rental that was added in this editshop=car_rental Maybe amenity=car_rental was meant here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcar_rental here? |
| 2 | 2025-06-20 12:25 | jmapb ♦404 | Yeah just a typo. But this is actually an automotive leasing broker (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_leasing) and I'm not sure it should be amenity=car_rental. Maybe closer to shop=car. There's a short mention of this question under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:sh... | |
| 124421816 by merlenormanstudio @ 2022-08-03 07:29 | 1 | 2025-06-20 10:25 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9928882901/history has shop = Express Facials that was added in this editshop=Express Facials ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https:... |
| 167645602 by cavixsd @ 2025-06-15 10:58 | 1 | 2025-06-19 14:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | Proszę przeczytaj i zastosuj się do https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian |
| 156936039 by 캔디레인 @ 2024-09-22 05:33 | 1 | 2025-05-30 13:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | what is the license of this data?are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ? |
| 2 | 2025-06-02 00:49 | 캔디레인 ♦4 | Hello, thank you for your message.The data in this changeset was mapped based on publicly available information provided by the Seoul Open Data Plaza (서울열린데이터광장).Source: https://data.seoul.go.kr/The license for data on the Seoul Open Data Plaza is "Korea Open Governm... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-02 09:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | Have you posted to imports@openstreetmap.org mailing list as required? | |
| 4 | 2025-06-02 09:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | I mostly worry that like CC-BY-SA it may require waiver or be otherwise not actually compatible | |
| 5 | 2025-06-19 10:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | Have you posted to imports@openstreetmap.org mailing list as required?Note that undiscussed imports can be reverted by anyone, at any time, without warning or further reason to do so (just "not discussed import" is good enough) | |
| 165998410 by geologist877 @ 2025-05-08 18:45 | 1 | 2025-06-13 15:04 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12820922880/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this editWhat kind of shop is here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting? |
| 2 | 2025-06-18 15:49 | geologist877 ♦1 | It's a tobacco shop/smoking equipment shop. Unsure about the amenity, so that hasn't been changed. Changeset here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167788591 | |
| 3 | 2025-06-19 10:02 | Mateusz Konieczny | if value for shop was set, then amenity=fixme may be removedI will do it | |
| 116146009 by Mauls @ 2022-01-14 12:33 | 1 | 2025-05-25 14:04 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1021108434/history - what kind of traces remain here nowadays?are there any? |
| 2 | 2025-06-19 09:56 | Mateusz Konieczny | is there any trace remaining of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764899747 nowadays? Or at time of mapping?is it mapped solely based on old maps? | |
| 79786177 by drspa44 @ 2020-01-20 08:51 | 1 | 2025-06-19 09:56 | Mateusz Konieczny | is there any trace remaining of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764899747 nowadays? Or at time of mapping?is it mapped solely based on old maps? |
| 2 | 2025-06-19 10:12 | drspa44 ♦3 | I don't know if there is any trace remaining of this particular segment. This part was mapped solely using Out of copyright OS Map, Hertfordshire XXXIX.NE, Revised: 1896, Published: 1899 | |
| 140179718 by staytuned @ 2023-08-21 12:38 | 1 | 2025-06-19 08:16 | Mateusz Konieczny | "please note that railway=razed is consumed by openrailwaymap and should thus not be deleted despite on-ground rule"that is incorrect tagging for renderer, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Incorrect_tagging_for_the_renderer"there is ample evidence that the ... |
| 166986053 by oeoeoe @ 2025-05-30 18:43 | 1 | 2025-05-30 19:13 | silversurfer83 ♦3,391 | Hi there :)there is one very important thing I wish to bring to your attention:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_onlyPlease do not misuse the "name" as a description. I just checked a couple of your older changes and they are filled with objects incorre... |
| 2 | 2025-06-18 17:31 | Mateusz Konieczny | are you sure that paths where you set name=cruising are actually having such name? | |
| 3 | 2025-06-18 17:31 | Mateusz Konieczny | also, are you sure that cyclists are banned there? | |
| 167585426 by michel60 @ 2025-06-13 17:35 | 1 | 2025-06-18 12:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4811471 ? |
| 167584911 by michel60 @ 2025-06-13 17:21 | 1 | 2025-06-18 12:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4811472 ? |
| 167584741 by michel60 @ 2025-06-13 17:16 | 1 | 2025-06-18 12:22 | Mateusz Konieczny | can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4811473 ? |
| 167612747 by bob3bob3 @ 2025-06-14 13:21 | 1 | 2025-06-18 12:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4811474 ? |
| 167751566 by box_911 @ 2025-06-17 18:34 | 1 | 2025-06-18 12:20 | Mateusz Konieczny | can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4811475 ? |
| 159995133 by SG86 @ 2024-12-06 13:44 | 1 | 2025-06-18 10:09 | Mateusz Konieczny | can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4811306 ? |
| 166646247 by StooJ @ 2025-05-23 09:21 | 1 | 2025-06-13 15:04 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12857131285/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this editWhat kind of shop is here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting? |
| 2 | 2025-06-16 13:00 | StooJ ♦1 | I was baffled by this. They sell:- Perfume- cleaning- household supplies- gardening suppliesI thought maybe `doityourself`, but they don't sell tools or anything and it doesn't capture the perfume!I will visit again and see if I can narrow it down. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-17 08:49 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dchemist ? | |
| 4 | 2025-06-17 11:08 | StooJ ♦1 | Ideal! Change made.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12857131285/history/2 | |
| 5 | 2025-06-17 18:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | Thanks!I like when changeset discussion goes well :) | |
| 167737597 by Softmap @ 2025-06-17 12:59 | 1 | 2025-06-17 13:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | have you discussed this unreviewed import with community?Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments ?See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/undiscussed-import-in-algeria/104175/6 |
| 167257252 by BRD-ZDP @ 2025-06-06 09:27 | 1 | 2025-06-11 03:19 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205763490/history - skąd pomysł że ten kod to nazwa drogi?jesteś pewien że ten kod jest wyraźnie oznakowany? (patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unsigned%20ref ) |
| 2 | 2025-06-16 06:37 | BRD-ZDP ♦2 | Dziękuję za wiadomość, poprawione | |
| 3 | 2025-06-17 08:50 | Mateusz Konieczny | dzięki wielkie za poprawki! | |
| 164436451 by arrhurr @ 2025-04-02 19:28 | 1 | 2025-04-08 10:56 | YomanNH ♦306 | Cześć,po co robisz takie falujące granice obszarów landuse=residential? Niepotrzebnie łączysz je z trawnikami, a potem dodajesz nagle jakieś dziwne punkty, żeby wygiąć granicę na środku trawnika. Chodzi np. o takie punkty: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12724158301 i https://... |
| 2 | 2025-04-08 11:41 | grzegorz75jan ♦452 | Klaustrofobicznie. Trochę ciasno tam dla mnie. Faktycznie ciekawe formy artystyczne tych obszarów.Yoman nie wiem czy ci przystanku nie zdemolował https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344653367arrhurr łap na święta i nie grzesz więcejhttps://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTgtPjg... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-08 11:49 | YomanNH ♦306 | No oczywiście, że usunął wiatę przystankową... Dzięki Grzegorz, że zauważyłeś. Trzeba będzie mieć oko na tego użytkownika. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-16 15:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | wysłałem W z błaganiem o przeczytanie | |
| 167620882 by arrhurr @ 2025-06-14 16:48 | 1 | 2025-06-16 13:53 | YomanNH ♦306 | Możesz wyjaśnić błędy, które ponownie popełniłeś, a o których pisałem już pod twoim poprzednim zestawem zmian? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164436451Błędy poprawiłem, a ty usunąłeś moją pracę, żeby znowu utworzyć "falujące" landuse=resident... |
| 2 | 2025-06-16 15:03 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofanie przywrócenia błędówhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167699180 | |
| 3 | 2025-06-16 15:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | dodatkow, czemu kasowałęś https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237778105 by zastąpić to jakąś misterną wycinanką? te chodniki na perony to też landuse=railway jak już dajemy landuse=railway na tramwaje | |
| 4 | 2025-06-16 15:06 | Mateusz Konieczny | czemu w tej edycji skasowano https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1375838791/history ? | |
| 5 | 2025-06-16 15:16 | Mateusz Konieczny | zachęca do robienia mniejszych edycji: część sensowna była ale zmiksowana z psuciem | |
| 149740776 by Tetryk @ 2024-04-08 15:36 | 1 | 2025-06-15 18:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4800617 ?rzekomo ich nie ma już |
| 2 | 2025-06-15 19:51 | Tetryk ♦55 | Usunąłem przystanki, w WTP już ich nie ma, ale jak jest z peronami to nie wiem. | |
| 53983104 by sarxos @ 2017-11-21 18:36 | 1 | 2025-06-15 18:03 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542131732 are there any visible traces whatsoever remaining? |
| 2 | 2025-06-16 06:22 | sarxos ♦11 | When I was there shortly before making the map changes, one could easily trace the railway through the forest. There are traces of embankments and depressions where rails and railway ties were removed. If someone is lucky, they might even come across a leftover tie, as some are still there. The dism... | |
| 140667118 by adas @ 2023-09-01 08:12 | 1 | 2025-06-15 18:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4659215 ? |
| 154247609 by Marek-M @ 2024-07-22 07:11 | 1 | 2025-06-15 17:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | zerniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806676 ?to nie jest czasem dwukierunkowe dla rowerów? |
| 2 | 2025-06-15 18:02 | Marek-M ♦900 | Poprawiłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167662442Ta edycja była związana wyłącznie z geometrią drogi ale faktycznie wygląda na dwukierunkową dla rowerów. | |
| 165071150 by RowerzystaAmator @ 2025-04-17 13:07 | 1 | 2025-06-15 17:48 | Mateusz Konieczny | zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806176 ? |
| 2 | 2025-06-22 18:31 | Szymson ♦366 | Po co podwójna nazwa ulicy i ścieżki? | |
| 167647121 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-06-15 11:42 | 1 | 2025-06-15 12:28 | user2137 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2025-06-15 13:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | cóż, przynajmniej nie jest tak źle jak z tymi co usiłują przepychać zmiany zakładając seryjnie konta zamiast korzystać z jednego lub jasno podać że mają kilka (z podaniem powodu na to) | |
| 3 | 2025-06-15 14:17 | user2137 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-15 14:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | jak rozumiem jesteś jednym z tych co usiłują przepychać zmiany zakładając seryjnie konta? | |
| 5 | 2025-06-15 17:24 | pavvv ♦474 | akurat w ogóle nie znam sytuacji w tej okolicy, a jest możliwość, że ta edycja była poprawna. po prostu musisz zrobić propozycję na forum i przedstawić argumenty i być może edycja zostanie wdrożona. tymi multikontami nic nie zdziałasz. | |
| 167651559 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-06-15 13:31 | 1 | 2025-06-15 13:31 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4801316 |
| 167610614 by user2137 @ 2025-06-14 12:24 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-14 12:25 | user2137 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2025-06-15 11:42 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofane jako edycja drogi wysokiej klasy (zmiana kategorii) bez uprzedniej dyskusji, do zrobienia na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167647121 | |
| 6342483 by Meghanand @ 2010-11-11 10:33 | 1 | 2025-06-15 07:50 | Mateusz Konieczny | if you are by any chance still visiting this area - can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806433 ?Construction was finished, right? |
| 48870128 by stevens @ 2017-05-21 20:37 | 1 | 2025-06-15 07:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806417 ?Have you since been there?I bet that it is not existing anymore, maybe you are capable of checking this? |
| 6033722 by nhmapguy @ 2010-10-13 21:09 | 1 | 2025-06-15 07:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806418 ? |
| 20684398 by Peter Dobratz @ 2014-02-20 22:12 | 1 | 2025-06-15 07:38 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806419 ? |
| 20667943 by Peter Dobratz @ 2014-02-20 03:35 | 1 | 2025-06-15 07:38 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806421 ? |
| 166112025 by fleopaul @ 2025-05-11 14:43 | 1 | 2025-06-14 20:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | what you meant by fixme:type=faience ? |
| 167591777 by Phef2137 @ 2025-06-13 20:42 | 1 | 2025-06-13 22:05 | bartgron ♦156 | Proszę o niezmienianie kategorii tak istotnych dróg bez przegadania tego gdziekolwiek. Zestaw zmian wycofany:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167593693 |
| 2 | 2025-06-14 19:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | 1) edytuj swoim kontem a nie zakładaj N nowych2) najpierw dyskusja w https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 | |
| 167623395 by Phef2137 @ 2025-06-14 18:04 | 1 | 2025-06-14 19:53 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofanie edycji multikontahttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167627325 |
| 167623366 by Phef2137 @ 2025-06-14 18:04 | 1 | 2025-06-14 19:53 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofanie edycji multikontahttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167627325 |
| 167592259 by Phef2137 @ 2025-06-13 21:01 | 1 | 2025-06-14 19:53 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofanie edycji multikontahttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167627325 |
| 154660574 by ynevesss @ 2024-07-31 17:12 | 1 | 2025-06-14 17:19 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304887308/history - was it really supposed to be a tree row? |
| 2 | 2025-06-14 17:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | or is " campo de futebol" a soccer playing field? | |
| 167583514 by Kamila_ @ 2025-06-13 16:42 | 1 | 2025-06-14 17:20 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1395026717 - czy ta droga ma swoją nazwę?"Droga lokalna" to wygląda na jej opis, nie nazwę |
| 129997499 by Lübeck @ 2022-12-12 12:31 | 1 | 2025-06-14 12:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10255511824/history has demolished:building = 1977 that was added in this editWhat this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means |
| 2 | 2025-06-14 12:19 | Mateusz Konieczny | Also, is there still anything at all remaining here? | |
| 157494288 by Mikey Co @ 2024-10-05 10:37 | 1 | 2025-06-14 12:07 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4805479 ? |
| 159777368 by kirmonkey @ 2024-11-30 15:12 | 1 | 2025-06-14 12:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4805480 ? |
| 134453819 by Roshmaps @ 2023-04-03 12:48 | 1 | 2025-06-14 12:04 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4805483 ? |
| 134428083 by dudone @ 2023-04-02 19:58 | 1 | 2025-06-14 12:03 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4805484 ? |
| 49643857 by cypriend @ 2017-06-18 20:49 | 1 | 2022-11-05 13:09 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3428784 ? |
| 2 | 2025-06-14 12:03 | Mateusz Konieczny | And https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4805485 ? | |
| 153093002 by bracl @ 2024-06-24 04:30 | 1 | 2025-06-14 12:02 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4805486 ? |
| 135441471 by ElliottPlack @ 2023-04-27 19:36 | 1 | 2025-06-13 15:18 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10847001792/history has fixme:type = no hunting that was added in this editIs it mapping 'no hunting' sign? Is it mapping something else? |
| 2 | 2025-06-13 15:25 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | Hi Mateusz! It is indeed mapping a no-hunting sign--that is very observant of you. This may be that same issue we were discussing with the EveryDoor developers on GitHub. Although I cannot remember exactly what button I pressed in the UI, I believe my intent was to say, "there is a thing here t... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-13 15:36 | Mateusz Konieczny | what about man_made=sign inscription=no hunting?orman_made=sign sign=no hunting? | |
| 4 | 2025-06-13 17:01 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | It is done! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167584206 | |
| 159248357 by stsquad @ 2024-11-17 15:43 | 1 | 2025-06-13 15:18 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12348531868/history has fixme:type = bridge that was added in this editIs it an attempt to map a bridge not present in OSM data? Then https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge has info how to do it properly |
| 157140474 by rotation26 @ 2024-09-26 17:44 | 1 | 2025-06-13 15:04 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12202274685/history has fixme:type = barber that was added in this editIs it an attempt to map a place specializing in masculine style hair cuts ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:hairdresser%253Dbarber )?Then likely shop=hairdresser + hairdress... |
| 166518219 by Harsh1212 @ 2025-05-20 10:52 | 1 | 2025-06-13 15:04 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12850719341/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this editWhat kind of shop is here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting? |
| 143908681 by Jurace79 @ 2023-11-11 17:24 | 1 | 2025-06-13 14:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4804452 ? |
| 166227222 by decmap @ 2025-05-13 22:58 | 1 | 2025-06-13 14:22 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12834933914/history has fixme:type = Flight school that was added in this editFlight school is typically mapped as amenity=flight_school, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dflight_school |
| 2 | 2025-06-30 00:09 | decmap ♦2 | Perfect, thank you! EveryDoor didn't suggest that tag. | |
| 30336746 by carlosz22 @ 2015-04-19 17:53 | 1 | 2025-06-13 14:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339391829/history has roof = skillion that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=skillion was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 136845743 by audtr @ 2023-06-01 20:21 | 1 | 2025-06-13 13:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4804376 - can you take a look?is it really cycleway where cyclists are banned? |
| 155375047 by Telegram Sam @ 2024-08-17 14:56 | 1 | 2025-04-17 08:32 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12116991230/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-06-13 00:56 | Telegram Sam ♦5 | Sorry for the delay. I'm not sure why I created that fix me. I might have just fumbled the controls in the app. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-13 13:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | I deleted it then | |
| 125443040 by goodidea @ 2022-08-27 13:33 | 1 | 2025-06-13 13:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9981586137/history has roof = yes that was added in this editHave you meant anything by that value? If yes, what you wanted to express? |
| 2 | 2025-06-14 16:26 | goodidea ♦95 | What's your problem with this tag?I want to express what the tag expresses (it has a red roof). I know, this is an old tag (it was in the wiki at pipeline=marker), now undocumented at marker=*, but I saw it in use with markers, and there is no good alternative so far (IMO it's NOT a ma... | |
| 148898348 by mol_an @ 2024-03-20 08:33 | 1 | 2025-06-13 12:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11747460678/history has fixme:type = fix that was added in this editwhat should be fixed here? do you need help with selecting better tags? |
| 2 | 2025-06-18 19:17 | habi ♦1,840 | Most probably related to https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880The user should probably have made an OSM Note that a https://www.suone.ch is missing. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-18 19:52 | habi ♦1,840 | I've extended the waterway in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167797936 and removed the `fixme:type=fix` | |
| 166735581 by Iagocds @ 2025-05-25 13:52 | 1 | 2025-06-13 12:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862615733/history has fixme:type = fix that was added in this editwhat should be fixed here? do you need help with selecting better tags? |
| 167502878 by impact0r @ 2025-06-11 17:54 | 1 | 2025-06-13 01:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350358365/history - czemu tertiary na residential zmieniłeś? |
| 2 | 2025-06-13 06:40 | impact0r ♦8 | Bo nie doczytałem opisu klasyfikacji. Poprawione. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-13 12:30 | Mateusz Konieczny | Dzięki wielkie! Miłego mapowania! | |
| 149198870 by IronSurfer @ 2024-03-26 23:13 | 1 | 2025-06-13 12:29 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356914534 is it torn down? not existing anymore? |
| 167523721 by impact0r @ 2025-06-12 08:57 | 1 | 2025-06-12 16:46 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1235796450/history - jest to wyasfaltowane? Czy wybetonowane? |
| 2 | 2025-06-13 06:46 | impact0r ♦8 | Jest ubita, z twardą nawierzchnią, ale ponieważ:1. w efekcie nawierzchnia jest bardziej zbliżona do paved niż unpaved. 2. Jest to jedyna droga łącząca miejscowości bez sporego objazdu3. nawigacje wykorzystujące dane OSM traktują ją tak samo, jak drogę gruntową, skutkiem czego uni... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-13 10:04 | Mateusz Konieczny | > Jest ubita, z twardą nawierzchniączyli to surface=compactedhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dcompacted | |
| 4 | 2025-06-13 10:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | > 3. nawigacje wykorzystujące dane OSM traktują ją tak samo, jak drogę gruntową, skutkiem czego unikają jej jak ognia, i (nawet przy próbie wymuszenia trasy) prowadzą przez wielokilometrowy objazd zamiast przez nią, to zgłoś problem do autorów tych aplikacji (że powin... | |
| 5 | 2025-06-13 10:06 | Mateusz Konieczny | w tym zgłaszaniu mogę nieco pomóc - o jakie aplikacje chodzi? próbowałeś zgłaszać? Skąd dokąd trasy szukasz? | |
| 6 | 2025-06-13 10:07 | Mateusz Konieczny | Były inne podobne edycje robione w ramach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Celowo_b%C5%82%C4%99dne_tagowanie_pod_renderer ? | |
| 7 | 2025-06-13 10:20 | impact0r ♦8 | Nie przeze mnie.Chodzi np. o Kurviger. Wysatrczy ustalić start i stop na końcu tego 300-500m odcinka i nawigacja poprowadzi najkrótszą trasą na około, czyli 14km. | |
| 8 | 2025-06-13 12:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | wygląda na to że mają forum na https://forum.kurviger.com/c/route-planning/60 - ja bym proponował tam napisać(nie wiem na ile reagują, ale to by ogólnie problem rozwiązało - może powinni przestać blokowac choć surface=compacted and highway=residential i podobnych? blokowanie hi... | |
| 167297384 by Ira Pathak @ 2025-06-07 08:05 | 1 | 2025-06-09 15:53 | MassCartog ♦119 | Hello, welcome to OSM. In this changeset could you explain more on what you are doing? Looks like you removed an overhead walking bridge that seem to still exist on the ground. You also removed two valid looking parking aisles from a church parking lot. Was this a mistake? Please respond and... |
| 2 | 2025-06-13 10:22 | Mateusz Konieczny | send PM with request to respondsee also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/georgia-tech-project-not-following-organized-editing-guidelines-making-mistakes-and-not-responding/131312 at official OSM forum | |
| 3 | 2025-06-13 10:25 | Mateusz Konieczny | Also, send email to the specified email account - though requiring that is absurd and unacceptable | |
| 4 | 2025-06-13 10:36 | Ira Pathak ♦2 | Hi, thank you for reaching out. The overhead bridges were removed since they typically connect private properties and are not accessible to the general public. Since mappers cannot legally or physically access these overhead bridges to evaluate them, our team has excluded them from the pedestrian ne... | |
| 5 | 2025-06-13 12:10 | Mateusz Konieczny | Deleting overhead bridge or service ways that exist is an invalid edit, please stop doing this> has excluded them from the pedestrian network.this can be done by adding access=private to them, not by deleting them> I had responded to the messagewhere you responded? | |
| 6 | 2025-06-13 13:25 | MassCartog ♦119 | Hi Ira Pathak, thanks for responding. Yes, I did get your DM message about your project, Thanks! But could you also please read the reply or and other messages in your messages box, we would like you to respond to those concerns. We have found issues with some of your team's edits, removing... | |
| 7 | 2025-06-13 19:43 | Ira Pathak ♦2 | Hey, yes I can go look for any other messages in my DMs and respond to those. Thanks! | |
| 8 | 2025-06-13 19:44 | Ira Pathak ♦2 | > where you responded?I responded to MassCartog's message in my DMs and provided all relevant information regarding our project along with the rationale behind some of our edits. | |
| 9 | 2025-06-13 21:45 | MassCartog ♦119 | Hello again, you DM's me information about your project, you did not respond to what I asked. We are asking you to read and respond to our concerns.Unfortunately your team been doing some damage to OSM data, valid features removed incorrectly, this is what we want help with. We want to fix ... | |
| 167569251 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-06-13 10:41 | 1 | 2025-06-13 10:42 | Mateusz Konieczny | http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=167569251 |
| 167508463 by CWilliamsGT @ 2025-06-11 20:43 | 1 | 2025-06-12 03:12 | MassCartog ♦119 | Hello, in this change set you removed what seems to be a valid way: Way: 869729008.You also removed two other valid service road that leads out to the main road, This looks like incorrect edits. Please respond if a better description of what you were trying to do. |
| 2 | 2025-06-13 10:40 | Mateusz Konieczny | See http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=167508463 - you are damaging service wayswhy? | |
| 3 | 2025-06-13 10:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | reverting bad edit that deleted service ways without explanation and ignored changeset commenthttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167569251 | |
| 167503903 by CWilliamsGT @ 2025-06-11 18:22 | 1 | 2025-06-13 10:19 | Mateusz Konieczny | reverting to enable revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167235882https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167568537 |
| 167525261 by Ksama123 @ 2025-06-12 09:38 | 1 | 2025-06-12 16:46 | Mateusz Konieczny | Jakie jest źródło tej edycji? |
| 2 | 2025-06-13 08:42 | YomanNH ♦306 | "w rzeczywistości ono nie istnieje"https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4803962 | |
| 3 | 2025-06-13 09:42 | kubahahaha ♦395 | kasuję. | |
| 167456493 by Hjhvbi @ 2025-06-10 17:39 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-10 22:14 | theDM ♦84 | Chodziło o kolizyjne skrzyżowanie na jezdni w kierunku północnym z ul. Kazimierza Przerwy-Tetmajera (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103367257) i na jezdni w południowym kierunku z drogą serwisową (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240515277). |
| 2 | 2025-06-11 03:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | czy była dyskusja na forum? przed zmienianiem kategorii istotnych dróg potwierdzenie sensowności zmiany na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 jest obowiązkowe | |
| 166993977 by StreetSurveyor @ 2025-05-31 00:17 | 1 | 2025-06-04 07:02 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Hello StreetSurveyor, during your survey have you encountered this sign https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Buttonwoods_private_community_sign.jpg which says "private roads, no trespassing" and have you decided that somehow this sign should be interpreted as "access=permissive&quo... |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 08:27 | StreetSurveyor ♦105 | Unfortunately as of 2023 access=private is widely used as a duplicate of access=permissive as well as ownership=private and should not be expected to match the originally intended meaning.” In my survey, each house receives mail delivery as well as trash and recycling pickup. This and the fac... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-04 08:28 | StreetSurveyor ♦105 | There is a sign but access talks to whether the road is physically restricted (gate). From the Wiki: “Note that access=private is intended to indicate that access is restricted, not whether the object is privately owned or not. Use ownership=private or operator:type=private to record this kind... | |
| 4 | 2025-06-04 10:26 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Hello StreetSurveyor, your interpretation of access tagging is not in line with the community consensus. An "access restriction" can be legal, it does not have to be physical (and in fact rarely is). The fact that mail delivery and trash collection services are allowed to use a road does n... | |
| 5 | 2025-06-09 16:44 | Mateusz Konieczny | I edited wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate#Clarification_of_the_term_%E2%80%9Cprivate%E2%80%9D to explicitly refute misunderstanding that happened here@StreetSurveyor - do you remember where you made edit like this one, that should be fixed? | |
| 6 | 2025-06-09 17:05 | StreetSurveyor ♦105 | Thank you both for your thoughtful responses and for explaining the tagging conventions. I genuinely appreciate the clarification, and I now understand that access=* is based on legal rights, not just physical access. That was my misunderstanding, and I apologize for any confusion or disruption caus... | |
| 7 | 2025-06-10 17:22 | Mateusz Konieczny | there is some discussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/help-needed-review-of-road-access-restrictions-mostly-massachusetts/131168> Lastly, if a “No Trespassing” sign is posted by a private individual, does that alone justify tagging a road as access=private? yes, if... | |
| 8 | 2025-06-11 02:37 | StreetSurveyor ♦105 | Hello,Thank you again for the detailed feedback. I want to respectfully reaffirm that I stand by my recent access tagging edits, which were made in good faith and also based on credible public sources.The City of Warwick’s official GIS system, https://www.axisgis.com/WarwickRI/ clearly... | |
| 167419849 by FanZandberga @ 2025-06-09 22:04 | 1 | 2025-06-10 08:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | Skąd te informacje? W jaki sposób zebrane były?Czy to też kopiowane z Google Maps? |
| 2 | 2025-06-10 10:18 | FanZandberga ♦2 | Galeria Wileńska ma swoją stronę internetową i tam są podane godziny otwarcia obiektu oraz restauracji: https://www.westfield.com/pl/poland/galeriawilenska | |
| 167416009 by Hjhvbi @ 2025-06-09 19:51 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-09 19:56 | Mateusz Konieczny | revert as undiscussed edit of major road classeshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167416148 |
| 167395748 by we_hate_old_tags_josm @ 2025-06-09 12:37 | 1 | 2025-06-09 15:35 | SekeRob ♦1,433 | Hi,Please see discussion on the Italian Community forum. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mappe-curiose-in-corso-da-we-hate-old-tags-josm/131182 . The names of many of the charging stations you added wikidata tags to are incorrect, mostly descriptive. Typically the the names on the chargin... |
| 2 | 2025-06-09 19:37 | Mateusz Konieczny | reverted undiscussed mass edit violating https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conducthttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167415569 | |
| 167415395 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-06-09 19:31 | 1 | 2025-06-09 19:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | see also brand tags added to fence node in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12871511447/history |
| 167397339 by we_hate_old_tags_josm @ 2025-06-09 13:10 | 1 | 2025-06-09 18:52 | Danysan95 ♦110 | Occhio che hai aggiunto per errore brand e brand:wikidata su un sacco di elementi in cui non andrebbe che fanno parte delle geometrie di distributori, per esempio https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8625494837 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/930214836 . Trovi l'elenco completo degli element... |
| 2 | 2025-06-09 19:31 | Mateusz Konieczny | reverted as broken undiscussed mas edit violating https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3308753834/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167415395 | |
| 167411241 by Hjhvbi @ 2025-06-09 17:48 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-09 17:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | zaprzestań zmian kategorii istotnych dróg bez wcześniejszej dyskusjihttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167411679 |
| 167411553 by Hjhvbi @ 2025-06-09 17:54 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-09 17:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | zaprzestań zmian kategorii istotnych dróg bez wcześniejszej dyskusjihttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167411679 |
| 167411527 by Hjhvbi @ 2025-06-09 17:53 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-09 17:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | zaprzestań zmian kategorii istotnych dróg bez wcześniejszej dyskusjihttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167411679 |
| 167411369 by Hjhvbi @ 2025-06-09 17:50 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-09 17:52 | Yunkers ♦369 | Jaką metodę używasz przy zmianach kategorii i gdzie można znaleźć dyskusję na temat tych odcinków? |
| 2 | 2025-06-09 17:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | zaprzestań zmian kategorii istotnych dróg bez wcześniejszej dyskusjihttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167411679 | |
| 167410909 by Hjhvbi @ 2025-06-09 17:41 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-09 17:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | zaprzestań zmian kategorii istotnych dróg bez wcześniejszej dyskusjihttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167411679 |
| 167410822 by Hjhvbi @ 2025-06-09 17:38 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-09 17:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | zaprzestań zmian kategorii istotnych dróg bez wcześniejszej dyskusjihttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167411679 |
| 167406558 by Hjhvbi @ 2025-06-09 16:02 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-09 17:52 | Mateusz Konieczny | zmiany do tej wycofane jako zmiany kategorii ważnych dróg bez dyskusji, pewnie to tez obchodzenie blokady |
| 167230148 by PrzemoPrincess @ 2025-06-05 16:02 | 1 | 2025-06-09 17:40 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543508093/history - to chyba nie jest peron? |
| 167410710 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-06-09 17:35 | 1 | 2025-06-09 17:36 | Mateusz Konieczny | klas dróg, nie nazw drógprzepraszam |
| 167403836 by Hjhvbi @ 2025-06-09 15:09 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-09 17:35 | Mateusz Konieczny | Co miała na celu ta edycja?Skąd sądzisz że ona prawidłowa była? |
| 152522891 by Caleb NHVR @ 2024-06-11 04:26 | 1 | 2025-06-08 15:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4795843 ? |
| 2 | 2025-06-15 23:32 | Caleb NHVR ♦10 | Hi Mateusz, I'll aim to have a look into this one. In the meantime, this resource regarding a large upgrade of Pacific Motorway - close to Darhi Milgirr Road, could have suitable information. Cheers. https://www.nsw.gov.au/driving-boating-and-transport/projects/pacific-highway-upgrade | |
| 161144969 by jnighan @ 2025-01-08 19:06 | 1 | 2025-06-08 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4795748 ? |
| 2 | 2025-06-09 17:58 | jnighan ♦122 | Yes! It is no longer a pharmacy. I will update it now | |
| 167338645 by FroschForscher @ 2025-06-08 08:02 | 1 | 2025-06-08 14:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4795744 ? |
| 161362975 by Anne am See @ 2025-01-15 00:03 | 1 | 2025-06-08 14:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/582013733/historyis there still water mill here? Or is it abandoned?I am confused why node with just name remained here |
| 2 | 2025-06-08 16:55 | streckenkundler ♦1,040 | Hei Anne,CS-Kommentar mit https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Germany#10/52.1680/14.0007 gesehen. Wäre es bei der Ragower Mühle besser, disused:man_made=watermill zu verwenden? Somit wir klar: "Das ist keine aktive Wassermühle mehr" ist? Oder gibt es dort a... | |
| 167268125 by skfd @ 2025-06-06 13:47 | 1 | 2025-06-06 16:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | thanksI removed alsofixme = typefixme:type = dining car(and if it is a food truck then street_vendor fits, and I definitely approve use of that tags as someone who invented it :) ) |
| 167253806 by PPete2 @ 2025-06-06 07:48 | 1 | 2025-06-06 16:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | I removed also check_date:footway:surface, footway:surfaceThese are both not needed if that it is just footway and also make it look like cycleway:surface is missing |
| 167254214 by JakubS @ 2025-06-06 08:00 | 1 | 2025-06-06 16:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | dzięki za poprawkę! |
| 131155036 by dudone @ 2023-01-11 17:08 | 1 | 2025-06-06 12:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4792583 ? |
| 134488982 by Roshmaps @ 2023-04-04 10:25 | 1 | 2025-06-06 12:30 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4792561#map=15/53.05539/-1.78496 ? |
| 157610463 by VA00 @ 2024-10-08 07:05 | 1 | 2025-06-06 03:49 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4792132 - to dalej w budowie jest?nie do końca wiem o co z tym construction=yes chodzi |
| 2 | 2025-06-06 06:38 | VA00 ♦582 | Wtedy droga była zablokowana i rozkopana. Zgaduję, że skończyli. | |
| 118461417 by D_FENCE @ 2022-03-14 09:11 | 1 | 2025-06-06 03:31 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9577331212/historyo co z tym fixme=housenumber chodzi? |
| 2 | 2025-06-06 03:32 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040157932/historya tutaj - o co chodzi z fixme=construction ? | |
| 158143128 by Bartek444 @ 2024-10-20 19:32 | 1 | 2025-06-06 03:29 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230412244/historycoś tu nie tak poszło, budynek skasowałeśpoprawisz? |
| 161830280 by VA00 @ 2025-01-27 18:31 | 1 | 2025-06-06 03:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288237969/history - co jest nie tak z tą linią? |
| 2 | 2025-06-06 06:37 | VA00 ♦582 | Generalnie teren był w trakcie karczowania: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575274439Miałem wątpliwości jak daleko to sięga, bo ścieżka była ledwo widoczna, a z drugiej strony prowadzi tamtędy wytyczony szlak. Nie miałem czasu sprawdzić połączenia. | |
| 154893460 by VA00 @ 2024-08-06 13:23 | 1 | 2025-02-24 14:35 | Yunkers ♦369 | Hej, czy to construction=yes na Brzezińskiego to błąd?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617556128#map=18/50.091698/19.842072 |
| 2 | 2025-02-24 15:29 | VA00 ♦582 | Wtedy w lecie wszystko było rozkopane. Wypadałoby sprawdzić ponownie, czy aby nie zrobiono lepszego połączenia w kierunki Rząski lub/i ul. Łupaszki. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-24 15:31 | VA00 ♦582 | https://ztp.krakow.pl/rower/audyty/audyt/rozbudowa-ul-brzezinskiego | |
| 4 | 2025-02-24 19:11 | Yunkers ♦369 | Dzięki. Takie połączenia są często skutkiem błędu więc wolałem się upewnić :) | |
| 5 | 2025-06-06 02:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221605696/history - o co z tym construction=yes chodzi? Że zbudowali? Że rozkopane jest i budują?Czemu be nie użyć highway=construction construction=path ? | |
| 6 | 2025-06-06 03:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | > Wtedy w lecie wszystko było rozkopane. to nie lepiej tą drogę jako highway=construction dać?czy było rozkopane ale przejezdne? | |
| 7 | 2025-06-06 06:31 | VA00 ♦582 | To co zdążyłem zauważyć z jadącego pociągu kilka dni temu, to wygląda na budowę przejścia podziemnego https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1370950280To chyba oznacza likwidację tej drogi? | |
| 157185179 by gszkr @ 2024-09-27 19:05 | 1 | 2025-06-06 03:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10923638605/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10923559706/historywiesz może czy tu są dwa osobne AED czy jeden? |
| 2 | 2025-06-06 07:24 | gszkr ♦52 | Niestety nie wiem. Byłem tam przypadkowo i zauważyłem brak opisu dokładnej lokalizacji. Teraz tak patrzę na mój opis i punkt i wydaje mi się niepoprawnie położony. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-06 07:28 | gszkr ♦52 | W sumie faktycznie dziwne, bo oba zgodnie z opisem zostały dodane przez AED Map, ale w odstępie godziny. Nie sądzę, by w tak małej odległości od siebie były dwa - pewien jestem tego, co dopisałem: na pewno jest w holu od strony parkingu. | |
| 136487379 by TomaszWiktor @ 2023-05-24 08:29 | 1 | 2025-06-06 03:00 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10923638605/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10923559706/historyna pewno tu są dwa osobne AED? |
| 167022644 by esia321 @ 2025-05-31 17:35 | 1 | 2025-06-06 01:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | skąd info że w https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12877502608#map=19/50.393153/21.748726 jest jakiś park? |
| 166339878 by KIbyNA @ 2025-05-16 09:21 | 1 | 2025-06-05 16:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=166339878https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31066340 definitely should not be a buildingbut is removal of research institute marking also a mistake? |
| 2 | 2025-06-05 16:14 | Mateusz Konieczny | is removing parking marking from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477139004/history intentional? | |
| 120432115 by granitschädel @ 2022-05-01 18:46 | 1 | 2025-06-05 14:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056486609/history - are there any remains whatsoever of this rail still present? |
| 2 | 2025-06-11 10:49 | granitschädel ♦14 | No, since there was build a park there, all remains was removed, except this little „new-built“ piece in the south. I haven't the time yet to transfer the razed railway tracks to OpenHistoryMap | |
| 165603538 by Kecsege @ 2025-04-29 17:48 | 1 | 2025-06-01 10:29 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4784911 ?Also, have you verified this notes? |
| 2 | 2025-06-03 21:38 | Kecsege ♦14 | I made it disused because of this osm note:https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4731830, but i made a taging mistake, so i delete the unnecessary tag. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-04 10:30 | Mateusz Konieczny | please, do not make edits based on notes without verification | |
| 4 | 2025-06-05 10:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | some notes are copying from Google Maps, some are confused, some are maliciousplease do NOT copy from notes without verification | |
| 96412324 by GreenRunner0 @ 2020-12-25 08:12 | 1 | 2024-05-01 15:43 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8259091359/history has tc = CEC7 that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed?Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?\... |
| 2 | 2025-06-05 01:02 | Jarek 🚲 ♦321 | The key `tc` has now been documented: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tcTagging `aeroway=aerodrome` + `abandoned=yes` seems problematic to me, probably it should be something like `abandoned:aeroway=aerodrome`? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix | |
| 3 | 2025-06-05 10:03 | Mateusz Konieczny | I am a bit surprised that "Lagoon Water Aerodrome" has visible traces left.> Tagging `aeroway=aerodrome` + `abandoned=yes` seems problematic to me, probably it should be something like `abandoned:aeroway=aerodrome`? See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefixprobably? I guess the question is ... | |
| 142182626 by Cardiff_Electric @ 2023-10-05 10:20 | 1 | 2025-06-04 11:07 | Mateusz Konieczny | Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4789599 ? |
| 161326551 by MichabraTV @ 2025-01-13 22:05 | 1 | 2025-06-03 15:09 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofane jako niewyjaśnione usuwanie, patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmianhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167140168 |
| 2 | 2025-06-03 19:44 | Sylabowy Kot ♦116 | > zmiany na lepsze> resolved:6> warning: 10Jak chcesz coś poprawiać, to tym bardziej patrz na ostrzeżenia, jakie ci edytor wskazuje. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-03 22:29 | Sylabowy Kot ♦116 | Moje niedopatrzenie, wychodzi 8:8. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-04 10:14 | Mateusz Konieczny | > Jak chcesz coś poprawiać, to tym bardziej patrz na ostrzeżenia, jakie ci edytor wskazuje.aczkolwiek nie powinny być zmieniane tylko dlatego bo edytor się domaga, część z nich jest wadliwe lub kompletnie bzdurne | |
| 5 | 2025-06-05 10:01 | Sylabowy Kot ♦116 | Ta, ciut bez sensu się odpaliłem. | |
| 167156083 by zek just wants a better commute @ 2025-06-04 00:12 | 1 | 2025-06-04 10:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | thanks so much for fixing this! |
| 153746775 by AnnaCatarina @ 2024-07-09 14:18 | 1 | 2025-06-02 16:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | note, in OSM we are not mapping tracks that are gone without traces |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 09:23 | AnnaCatarina ♦25 | There is traces in the former tram depot. It should be clear, how the trams got there, therfor the linking rails, even they have been razed, should be visible in ORM or other special maps. They are not visible in OSM. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-04 10:12 | Mateusz Konieczny | > therfor the linking rails, even they have been razedthen they are not mappable in OSM> should be visible in ORMmaybe, that is why new version of ORM is taking historic railway data from OHM where such data can be validly added | |
| 167134047 by Torunianin @ 2025-06-03 12:45 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-03 12:51 | NorthCrab_upload ♦6,917 | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w ... |
| 2 | 2025-06-03 12:56 | Mateusz Konieczny | Przestań niszczyć adresyhttp://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=167134047zastąpiłeś https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2973023249/history przez https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547027531 tracąc nazwę ulicypo co? Adresy na budynkach są może minimalnie lepsze ale nie na tyle b... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-03 12:56 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofanie edycji psującej adresyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167134508 | |
| 4 | 2025-06-03 14:58 | Torunianin Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 5 | 2025-06-03 14:59 | Torunianin Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 6 | 2025-06-03 15:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | > nie psucie, tylko łączeniezobacz komentarz wyżejzepsułeś jeden z adresówjeśli zepsujesz jeden adres na 5000 to straty większe niż zyski z przenoszenia na obszary | |
| 7 | 2025-06-03 15:22 | Mateusz Konieczny | jak ty te adresy przenosisz? ręcznie przepisujesz?jak już w iD to robisz to daj wyświetlanie tagów jako tekst, nie tabelkę (takie duże i na listą znaczników) i skopiuj znaczniki jako tekstjak to niezrozumiałe to daj znać a wytłumaczę lepiej | |
| 8 | 2025-06-03 15:25 | YomanNH ♦306 | "nie ma morza pinezek na budynkach"Jakbyś jeszcze zamknął morze uwag, które utworzyłeś z drugiego konta lub anonimowo, to byłoby fajnie. Byłoby to o wiele bardziej przydatne, niż to przenoszenie adresów. | |
| 9 | 2025-06-03 17:03 | Torunianin Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 10 | 2025-06-03 17:06 | Torunianin Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 11 | 2025-06-03 17:06 | Torunianin Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 12 | 2025-06-03 17:08 | Torunianin Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 13 | 2025-06-03 17:20 | Torunianin Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 14 | 2025-06-03 17:21 | Torunianin Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 15 | 2025-06-03 20:28 | YomanNH ♦306 | Cieszę się, tylko postaraj się nie robić literówek w nazwach dodawanych miejsc, tak jak w moim nicku ;) | |
| 16 | 2025-06-04 12:07 | Torunianin Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 167140013 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-06-03 15:05 | 1 | 2025-06-03 15:19 | Mateusz Konieczny | niestety, rewert oznacza utracenie też sensowych części tamtych edycji |
| 167140294 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-06-03 15:12 | 1 | 2025-06-03 15:19 | Mateusz Konieczny | niestety, rewert oznacza utracenie też sensowych części tamtych edycji |
| 167140168 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-06-03 15:09 | 1 | 2025-06-03 15:18 | Mateusz Konieczny | niestety, rewert oznacza utracenie też sensowych części tamtych edycji |
| 166919545 by SzybkieDrogi @ 2025-05-29 12:33 | 1 | 2025-06-03 15:18 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1390697907/history - skąd takie info że ta i inne linie kolejowe są na serio planowanejak już proposed mapujesz to zawsze podawaj źródło |
| 161324506 by MichabraTV @ 2025-01-13 20:48 | 1 | 2025-06-03 15:12 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofane jako niewyjaśnione usuwanie, patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmianhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167140294 |
| 167131076 by Torunianin @ 2025-06-03 11:32 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-03 14:50 | Mateusz Konieczny | przenoszenie adresów na obszary budynków nie jest żadną naprawądodatkowo, tu było jeszcze sporo edycji które nie są z adresami związane |
| 2 | 2025-06-03 14:57 | Torunianin Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-03 15:11 | Mateusz Konieczny | nie protestuję przeciw samemu przenoszeniu - ale nie jest to naprawa i ma sens tylko jak ani jeden adres nie zostanie zniszczony | |
| 4 | 2025-06-03 19:50 | Torunianin Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 167139779 by Torunianin @ 2025-06-03 14:59 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-03 15:10 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofanie uszkadzania adresów - patrz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167134047https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167140187 |
| 161357816 by MichabraTV @ 2025-01-14 20:03 | 1 | 2025-06-03 15:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofane jako niewyjaśnione usuwanie, patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmianhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167140013 |
| 137649810 by Gurusraouta @ 2023-06-22 14:14 | 1 | 2025-04-03 11:44 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10880532788/historywhy you deleted this tags and left bare check_date?if there is house there why you deleted house node without adding house area?if it is not there, why you kept empty node without deleting it? |
| 2 | 2025-04-03 11:44 | Mateusz Konieczny | likely appears also to other nodes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135885981 | |
| 3 | 2025-06-02 22:56 | Mateusz Konieczny | send PM in https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1260222 | |
| 4 | 2025-06-03 09:37 | Gurusraouta ♦5 | Generic names like "house" are undesirable in OSM, so they have to be removed. The whole nodes where faulty created and needed to be recreated. A house node is completely unneeded and can be redrawn by someone through the satelitte images. I just forgot to also remove check_date. | |
| 5 | 2025-06-03 13:04 | Mateusz Konieczny | > A house node is completely unneededit is better than nothing | |
| 167132067 by Torunianin @ 2025-06-03 11:55 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-03 12:00 | NorthCrab_upload ♦6,917 | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości... |
| 2 | 2025-06-03 12:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofanie edycji konta psującego adresyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167134602 | |
| 3 | 2025-06-03 14:53 | Torunianin Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 167131387 by Wariacik Wariacik @ 2025-06-03 11:39 | 1 | 2025-06-03 12:40 | Mateusz Konieczny | Dzięki za dodanie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1391810155 !Thanks for adding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1391810155 ! |
| 167110203 by Torunianin @ 2025-06-02 21:29 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-02 21:41 | NorthCrab_upload ♦6,917 | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień add... |
| 2 | 2025-06-03 07:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | Skąd wiesz że https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017523556 ma równocześnie nazwę ulicy i jej nie ma?Skąd wiesz że skasowany tam https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4525444367/history był błędny? | |
| 161992001 by Yilin Meng @ 2025-01-31 21:00 | 1 | 2025-04-03 02:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12547497331/historyis it restaurant? fast food place? food truck? |
| 2 | 2025-06-02 22:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4787655 | |
| 153055402 by Chathu@123 @ 2024-06-23 07:17 | 1 | 2025-04-18 09:45 | Mateusz Konieczny | "Name Board Fhss" - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12002151967/historyis it a board with name "Fhss"? |
| 2 | 2025-06-02 22:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4787652 | |
| 156933480 by Barrman @ 2024-09-22 01:51 | 1 | 2025-04-03 02:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/638176421/historyis it deliberate that you deleted amenity=fast_food without replacement? |
| 2 | 2025-06-02 22:47 | Mateusz Konieczny | reverted as accidental mistakehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167111665 | |
| 167082494 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-06-02 09:16 | 1 | 2025-06-02 10:05 | pavvv ♦474 | Maro21 zwykle odpisuje na komentarze z opóźnieniem, więc lepiej napisać do niego bezpośrednią wiadomość. |
| 2 | 2025-06-02 16:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | to już jest jego obowiązek sprawdzić to PRZED rewertemzwłaszcza jak już wie że jest dyskusja na dany temat | |
| 3 | 2025-06-02 16:58 | pavvv ♦474 | A skąd miał wiedzieć, kiedy jest revert, jeśli nie zobaczył Twojej wiadomości z powodu, którego opisałem. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-02 17:00 | Mateusz Konieczny | jeśli się zabierze ponownie na dzielenie tego terminala na rzekomo osobne budynki to powinien pamiętać że już to wcześniej robił, więc ktoś tą edycję wycofał | |
| 5 | 2025-06-02 20:31 | maro21 ♦711 | Mateusz Konieczny: Czy mógłbyś cierpliwe poczekać, aż przeczytam twoją wiadomość i na nią odpiszę? Czy jest to pilna sprawa niecierpiąca zwłoki i świat się zawali?Nie podoba mi się takie cofanie, jeśli nawet nie miałem okazji przeczytać twojej wiadomości.Prowadzę rozmow... | |
| 6 | 2025-06-02 22:11 | Mateusz Konieczny | zauważ że ja napisałem, czekałem i dałem znać o wycofaniujak ty wycofywałeś to nie odpisałeś w dyskusji i nie dałeś znać ludziom że wycofałeś ich edycjęnie do końca rozumiem co niby źle zrobiłem - miałem czekać tydzień? dwa?a jak moja edycja okaże się zła to mo... | |
| 166884741 by Shawnster @ 2025-05-28 16:46 Active block | 1 | 2025-06-02 18:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1390498589 so it will be marked as a building?Do you need explanation how to do this? |
| 2 | 2025-06-18 05:47 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,118 | DWG revert - poor quality mapping & unresponsive userhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167765259 | |
| 167021510 by daniel_k @ 2025-05-31 17:07 | 1 | 2025-06-02 18:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | what is source of this name data? |
| 2 | 2025-06-03 04:50 | osmviborg ♦1,643 | Fantasy | |
| 3 | 2025-06-03 17:31 | daniel_k ♦25 | Look: https://www.deutschefotothek.de/documents/obj/71051561/df_dk_0010001_0918 | |
| 4 | 2025-06-03 19:22 | b-holdet ♦313 | It is not a forrest but a wetland, that is overgrown with a scrub.Name.da: Kogsbøl Mosehttps://kortoverblik.dk/spatialmap?mapheight=1440&mapwidth=2885&label=&ignorefavorite=true&profile=sdfikort&selectorgroups=gst_dhym+stednavne&layers=theme-dtk_skaermkort_daem... | |
| 5 | 2025-06-03 21:37 | daniel_k ♦25 | Thank you! The correct name:da is Kogsbøl Mose | |
| 167089829 by AnnaCatarina @ 2025-06-02 12:23 | 1 | 2025-06-02 16:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | are there any remains whatsoever of this track? |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 09:26 | AnnaCatarina ♦25 | Yes, there are foot paths or farm tracks or even roads ontop the former railway embankment. | |
| 166794985 by maro21 @ 2025-05-26 19:26 | 1 | 2025-06-02 09:47 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway=jet%20bridge> "An enclosed, movable connector that extends from an airport terminal to an airplane"movable? |
| 2 | 2025-06-02 09:48 | Mateusz Konieczny | chyba że wiki jest błędne? | |
| 3 | 2025-06-02 09:48 | Mateusz Konieczny | i chyba te nie są doczepiane do samolotów, prawda? | |
| 166704422 by maro21 @ 2025-05-24 16:16 | 1 | 2025-05-24 16:18 | pavvv ♦474 | A to ciekawe, bo na forum krytykowany był stan sprzed mojej edycji.https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/i-have-been-accused-of-vandalism/128483 |
| 2 | 2025-05-24 16:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | skąd pomysł że https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210272133 to osobny samodzielny budynek? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-24 20:20 | maro21 ♦711 | Budynek nie może mieć layer=1, bo jest na powierzchni ziemi, a nie wisi w powietrzu. Te mosty będące przejściem do samolotu są nad drogą, więc powinny mieć layer=1. Skoro więc budynki różnią się atrybutami i nie można tego pogodzić, to muszą być rozdzielone. Nie mają też ws... | |
| 4 | 2025-05-24 23:14 | 4b696d ♦79 | I do not speak Polish so I used Google Translate.An object with layer=1 can of course touch the ground. It is just used to describe the vertical relation of objects, nothing else. Bridges with layer=1 also often touch the ground and don't hover. Do all the pillars of a bridge have the same ... | |
| 5 | 2025-05-25 06:35 | Mateusz Konieczny | > Budynek nie może mieć layer=1, bo jest na powierzchni ziemi, a nie wisi w powietrzu.skąd ten pomysł? layer=1 nie oznacza tegoco to ma do samodzielności budynku lub nie?> Skoro więc budynki różnią się atrybutami i nie można tego pogodzić, to muszą być rozdzielo... | |
| 6 | 2025-05-26 10:42 | Mateusz Konieczny | I am reverting that edit as it was done due to not understanding how building:part and layer work, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166704422https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166772764 | |
| 7 | 2025-05-26 19:30 | maro21 ♦711 | Konieczny:> "czy znasz building:part ? On jest dokładnie dla sytuacji gdy coś jest jednym budynkiem a atrybuty się różnią"Zmapowałem kilkaset budynków we Wrocławiu w 3D i konsekwentnie stosuję taki sam schemat mapowania budynków. Doskonale wiem co to j... | |
| 8 | 2025-05-26 22:16 | Mateusz Konieczny | "Skoro więc budynki różnią się atrybutami i nie można tego pogodzić, to muszą być rozdzielone." building:part służy dokładnie to tego by obsłużyć sytuację że jakiś atrybut się różni pomiędzy częściami budynkunie wymaga on tworzenie osobnych obsza... | |
| 9 | 2025-05-26 22:18 | Mateusz Konieczny | I skąd pomysł że np. na https://businesstraveller.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Port-Lotniczy-Wroc%C5%82aw-19.jpg to przejście nad drogą i ta klatka schodowa to dwa osobne budynki? | |
| 10 | 2025-05-26 22:20 | Mateusz Konieczny | > ja zawsze mam rację, twoje argumenty mnie nie insteresująto ty zignorowałeś moje pytanie i nie odpowiedziałeś na nie | |
| 11 | 2025-05-31 09:27 | Mateusz Konieczny | Czy jesteś pewien że na https://businesstraveller.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Port-Lotniczy-Wroc%C5%82aw-19.jpg przejście nad drogą i ta klatka schodowa to dwa osobne budynki?Jeśli tak to czemu?Czy też lotnisko się od tego czasu zmieniło?(planuję przywrócić mapowanie t... | |
| 12 | 2025-06-02 09:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167082494 | |
| 166794941 by maro21 @ 2025-05-26 19:25 | 1 | 2025-05-28 14:25 | Mateusz Konieczny | Skąd przekonanie że to osobne budynki? Patrz zdjęcie np z https://businesstraveller.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Port-Lotniczy-Wroc%C5%82aw-19.jpg Czemu uważasz że to przejście nad drogą i ta klatka schodowa to dwa osobne budynki, a nie część budynku terminala? |
| 2 | 2025-05-28 14:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | było już zadane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166704422 ale tam zignorowaneproszę, odpowiedz na to pytanie (najlepiej w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166704422 ) | |
| 3 | 2025-06-01 13:49 | Mateusz Konieczny | Ping? | |
| 4 | 2025-06-02 09:16 | Mateusz Konieczny | to nie są osobne budynki, wycofuję tą edycję - jak się nie zgadzasz to odpowiedz w dyskusji przed wycofywaniemhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167082494 | |
| 152114701 by John Bek @ 2024-06-01 10:28 | 1 | 2025-06-02 09:10 | Mateusz Konieczny | construction tags also should be removed, right?See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4785029 |
| 166079312 by Thorsten2219 @ 2025-05-10 17:24 | 1 | 2025-06-01 09:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993008294/history has roof = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 2 | 2025-06-01 12:11 | Thorsten2219 ♦14 | Hi Mateusz.Sure. I checked with overpass and fixed some more. Many thanks for your feedback!-- In case I see and fix more (anywhere), can this be safely changed without making troubles? | |
| 3 | 2025-06-01 18:15 | Mateusz Konieczny | I think so (I am slowly preparing bot edit, this message was part of checking that noone is opposed)though if someone gets to it before me I will be more than happy with it | |
| 4 | 2025-06-02 10:31 | Thorsten2219 ♦14 | I would prefer more automatic changes, also additions. I have already read a thread, where you discussed similar things .. a lot of work. Thanks for this.Automatic change appreciated from my side. | |
| 129588124 by Zcm60220 @ 2022-12-01 06:46 | 1 | 2025-06-01 15:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | Why you created such network of ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/956523771 where there is a simple square/parking? |
| 138953592 by Stretch Longfellow @ 2023-07-24 18:19 | 1 | 2025-06-01 11:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4785127 ?Is this bridge still closed? |
| 2 | 2025-06-18 01:05 | Stretch Longfellow ♦92 | It is not. Fixed. Thanks for catching; not sure how this slipped past me! | |
| 137182495 by HansWürstchen @ 2023-06-10 18:52 | 1 | 2025-06-01 11:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4785024 ?(maybe other ways from that edit are also affected) |
| 135946643 by Thorsman @ 2023-05-10 17:45 | 1 | 2025-06-01 10:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | is this supermarket still closed? |
| 157385914 by ardinin @ 2024-10-02 15:57 | 1 | 2025-06-01 10:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139789627 - why you think it exists now? It is not visible on Esri imagery |
| 2 | 2025-06-01 11:08 | ardinin ♦5 | Honestly, I don´t remember. Maybe I had different aerials these times.For now you`re correct, there is no building. | |
| 166884956 by Nukavarapu Eswar Chowdary @ 2025-05-28 16:52 | 1 | 2025-06-01 09:15 | Mateusz Konieczny | in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1390499800/history you have not really mapped building but rather entire industrial area - if you want you can also map buildings inside itI tried to fix tagging already |
| 131106985 by ticki_52 @ 2023-01-10 13:30 | 1 | 2025-06-01 09:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127265044/history has roof = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 2 | 2025-06-01 09:49 | ticki_52 ♦113 | You are right- input mistake. See #167042278 | |
| 135219927 by laurent-38 @ 2023-04-22 08:47 | 1 | 2025-06-01 09:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143568991/history has roof = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 2 | 2025-06-01 10:28 | laurent-38 ♦172 | Oh yes, fixedThanks for spotting this | |
| 135007525 by Philippe Sampont @ 2023-04-17 09:41 | 1 | 2025-06-01 09:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154872714/history has roof = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 164315287 by feathered_ouul @ 2025-03-31 07:21 | 1 | 2025-05-31 23:28 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1746469594/history - why you changed brand:wikidata to point to American rather Canadian variant of Safeway? |
| 134153032 by Johnwhelan @ 2023-03-26 22:09 | 1 | 2025-05-31 08:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/616076065/history has roof:shape = pitched that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=skillion was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roof:shape=pitched |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 09:00 | Mateusz Konieczny | Or roof:shape=gabled? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-31 13:04 | Johnwhelan ♦84 | First background for the most part I live in Canada and armchair map from imagery. I used to do a lot of HOT validation but found looking at a small part of the map and doing multiple checks to see if it had been mapped correctly took a lot more time than just grabbing a larger chunk of the map the... | |
| 4 | 2025-05-31 14:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | asked on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81650483 then, kind of unlikely they will reply (or even can reply,) but who knows | |
| 5 | 2025-05-31 15:49 | Johnwhelan ♦84 | O ye of little faith.It's a famous biblical reference Matthew 16:8 just in case English isn't your first language.John | |
| 81650483 by Stefano Verugi @ 2020-03-01 17:56 | 1 | 2025-05-31 14:40 | Mateusz Konieczny | Which kind of shape you meant here ?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roof:shape%3Dskillion or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roof:shape%3Dgabled ? |
| 146376176 by Dezza @ 2024-01-17 18:18 | 1 | 2025-05-31 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1240311420/history has roof = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 16:48 | Dezza ♦12 | Hello! Thanks for letting me know!Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167020706 | |
| 123728034 by okwithmydecay @ 2022-07-17 16:48 | 1 | 2025-05-31 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079267107/history has roof = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 16:27 | okwithmydecay ♦33 | Thanks for the heads-up, I have corrected https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167019846 | |
| 142322261 by VictorIE @ 2023-10-08 22:39 | 1 | 2025-05-31 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207742279/history has roof = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 164955820 by mocnysiuwaks @ 2025-04-14 19:59 Active block | 1 | 2025-04-17 11:28 | Yunkers ♦369 | W Polsce przyjęło się że należy dyskutować zmiany kategorii dróg secondary wzwyż. Czy ta zmiana była przedyskutowana? |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 10:22 | Mateusz Konieczny | chyba zmiana wycofana | |
| 166870699 by mocnysiuwaks @ 2025-05-28 11:13 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-28 17:23 | Yunkers ♦369 | Hej, Byłes już wielokrotnie informowany, że zmiany kategorii należy przedyskutować. Dodatkowo, jesteś pewny, że to główna droga Góra-Polkowice? Z czego to wynika? |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 10:20 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167005651 ze względu na brak dyskusji przed | |
| 166895102 by mocnysiuwaks @ 2025-05-28 22:07 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-29 05:24 | Yunkers ♦369 | Odpowiadanie na komentarze jest obowiązkowe. Wystarczyło to zrobić żeby uniknąć wycofywania. Nie potrafię zrozumieć dlaczego celowo olewasz zasady społeczności, ale z pewnością nie pomoże to w utrzymaniu Twoich zmian. |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 10:19 | Mateusz Konieczny | komentarz był np w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164955820 | |
| 136948397 by Hidoo00 @ 2023-06-04 21:10 | 1 | 2025-05-31 08:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1136821366/history has roof:shape = pitched that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=skillion was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roof:shape=pitched |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 09:00 | Mateusz Konieczny | Or roof:shape=gabled? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-31 09:11 | Hidoo00 ♦70 | Hello, thanks for your dedication to quality control!I didn't add any tags at all from what I can remember, only a drop-in replacement from building:roof:* to roof:*. That node (which really is nonsensical as it has no top level tags) had *=pitched before I touched it as well. | |
| 159643471 by Ctrl+shiftF5 @ 2024-11-27 05:55 | 1 | 2025-05-31 08:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1332438942/history has roof:shape = pitched that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=skillion was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roof:shape=pitched |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 09:00 | Mateusz Konieczny | Or roof:shape=gabled? | |
| 164529002 by pavvv @ 2025-04-04 21:18 | 1 | 2025-04-05 17:28 | 4b696d ♦79 | just why? |
| 2 | 2025-04-05 19:37 | pavvv ♦474 | It's obvious vandalism. You added layer=1 to the terminal building and made the gates have the same building:levels. They're not the same building. | |
| 3 | 2025-04-05 19:55 | 4b696d ♦79 | Settle down a little bit. You don't seem to know what vandalism is. I did not destroy anything or added features that do not exist or anything like that. Please check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism to find out what vandalism is.Of course that is the same building. Check o... | |
| 4 | 2025-04-05 20:07 | pavvv ♦474 | Of course you destroyed features. Have you even been to the airport in-person? Buildings like this one shouldn't have the layers since they touch the ground. Otherwise it implies that the POI inside it aren't in the building.The connectors between the airplane and the main building are s... | |
| 5 | 2025-04-05 20:34 | 4b696d ♦79 | I did not destroy anything and even if I did that is not automatically vandalism. Please actually read the linked wiki article. Do you really think that someone with way more mapping experience in his account is going to randomly vandalize?The layer tag does not imply that the POI are anywhere. ... | |
| 6 | 2025-04-07 22:02 | Rogoyski ♦219 | I support the opinion that this is one building.Linking the layer value with whether or not 'the building is touching the ground' has no grounds. The layer value of the building also implies nothing for the POIs that are found inside the building's outline. | |
| 7 | 2025-04-08 11:29 | Yog Sot ♦229 | great discussion lolA whole building can't have `layer 1` because only parts of it are floating in the air so `highway` can go under it. Alternativelly you can tag the highway sections to be tunnels and you probably should, but really, speak to the point xD | |
| 8 | 2025-04-08 19:19 | 4b696d ♦79 | I have started a discussion on this issue on the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/i-have-been-accused-of-vandalism/128483 | |
| 9 | 2025-04-08 19:28 | 4b696d ♦79 | @Yog SotWhy not? One could use tunnel=building_passage but not tunnel=yes. It is not a tunnel. | |
| 10 | 2025-04-08 20:59 | Yog Sot ♦229 | yeah, which you did not ;]ya should really get more to the point rather than complain about vandalisms and the likes. just figure it out between yourselves | |
| 11 | 2025-04-08 22:16 | Rogoyski ♦219 | What @YogSot is saying about levels is simply not true. | |
| 12 | 2025-04-09 00:32 | Yog Sot ♦229 | well, 4b696d already knows how to solve the issue and work it our with Pavvv, but yeah, instead of giving out a solution, you hold it to yourself xDIMHO whole thing could be one building, but without layer tag, tho then you gotta use tunnel=building_passage. tbh it should be used even now | |
| 13 | 2025-05-31 08:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | discussion continued in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166704422 and https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/i-have-been-accused-of-vandalism/128483/ | |
| 54901760 by lcat @ 2017-12-25 08:21 | 1 | 2025-05-31 08:46 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431875098/history has roof = eave that was added in this editHave you meant anything by that value? If yes, what you wanted to express? |
| 166721354 by MichaelCollinson @ 2025-05-25 06:43 | 1 | 2025-05-31 08:44 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244040090/history has roof_shape = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 166897302 by Danielhiii @ 2025-05-29 00:33 | 1 | 2025-05-30 08:29 | Mateusz Konieczny | Please, read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 153359913 by Tresho @ 2024-06-30 09:05 | 1 | 2025-05-26 15:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11264488404/historyis it Loro or Tamoil? Some tags point at one, some at the secondOr is Loro and Tamoil the same thing? |
| 2 | 2025-05-26 16:04 | ivanbranco ♦2,695 | Aggiungo, perchè questi elementi hanno due ref:mise? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-29 04:43 | Mateusz Konieczny | PMed user ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1257875 ) as they are active but ignore changeset comment | |
| 4 | 2025-05-29 10:10 | Tresho ♦37 | Buongiorno, scusate la poca reattività.Avevo fatto la modifica su suggerimento di Osmose, senza accorgermi della duplicazione.Ho corretto secondo il database del ministero su cui si basa Osmose.Matteo | |
| 5 | 2025-05-29 17:14 | Mateusz Konieczny | no longer mismatches itself | |
| 166835002 by DetectiveConan @ 2025-05-27 16:31 | 1 | 2025-05-29 12:50 | Mateusz Konieczny | Have you discussed this mass replacement anywhere?see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/the-description-of-cuisine-beef-noodle-is-so-weird/130594/12 |
| 129425160 by Lindsey Bonsu @ 2022-11-27 08:04 | 1 | 2025-05-29 09:03 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10220972133/history - is this mission house some sort of religious office? Church? |
| 135288307 by huopa @ 2023-04-24 07:28 | 1 | 2025-05-29 05:31 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1165015347/history - it is natural=wood, not nature=woodI fixed this one |
| 142047224 by Longhorn256 @ 2023-10-02 16:19 | 1 | 2025-05-29 04:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11234067189/history - is this name referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116410943 building or to something else? |
| 147275787 by Steve Marquis @ 2024-02-09 22:35 | 1 | 2025-04-18 08:30 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11606152460/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-04-20 12:05 | Steve Marquis ♦1 | It's a house (made out of straw bales and larch timber frames and cladding. Trading is in the open where there is any and usually harvested at the time. We might add a stand at the road for eggs, etc. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-28 23:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | so what is being sold here? vegetables? | |
| 166745734 by Danrejk @ 2025-05-25 17:59 | 1 | 2025-05-25 22:13 | stasiu512 ♦157 | Cześć jaki jest sens rozdzielania tego na tyle linii o takich samych tagach jak np tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389611430? |
| 2 | 2025-05-26 00:14 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12863030341/history - i po co ten punkt?Jest to nawet prawda? To raczej wyżej niż 10 cm nad poziomem morza | |
| 3 | 2025-05-26 05:32 | Danrejk ♦2 | To trzeba naprawić, zimportoealem z kmz i musiałem pominąć | |
| 4 | 2025-05-28 23:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | ten bubel poprawiłem ale tego jest więcej - zerknij np na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12863030371proszę, popraw to | |
| 134237168 by Cebderby @ 2023-03-28 21:25 | 1 | 2025-05-28 21:02 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4717876 ? |
| 2 | 2025-05-28 22:23 | Cebderby ♦299 | It's a marginal case. Compared to how it was, it was made dual and feels like it. The river bridge has old and new halves with a physical division, and the W arm of the T junction has a more-than-minimal island and about a 13m spacing between E and W bound. So this section is divided. Beyon... | |
| 159898718 by Richard Carden @ 2024-12-03 22:14 | 1 | 2025-05-28 21:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments ? |
| 166201039 by Nathan_A_RF @ 2025-05-13 12:45 | 1 | 2025-05-28 20:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | what is the source of that edit?how you know about height here? |
| 2 | 2025-05-28 21:08 | Nathan_A_RF ♦219 | I changed the tags from maxheight to height which is more appropriate. | |
| 152825630 by BudgieInWA @ 2024-06-18 02:22 | 1 | 2025-05-28 15:10 | Mateusz Konieczny | are you sure about location of power outlet in the middle of the park?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11989230568 |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 00:42 | BudgieInWA ♦26 | Yes! There are a few around the park, mounted on short poles, for food trucks during events and that kind of thing.I think I figured out the correct tagging, including the socket type, for one of the others a while ago ... | |
| 166877976 by danield4 @ 2025-05-28 14:07 | 1 | 2025-05-28 14:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | Pozdrawiam!I zachęcam do podawania opisów zmian, patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian |
| 102205659 by voltairovicz @ 2021-04-02 16:23 | 1 | 2025-05-22 14:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925258503/history - cokolwiek wskazuje na to by to były realne plany? |
| 2 | 2025-05-28 09:39 | voltairovicz ♦202 | Witaj, czytalem wiele artykulow ze jak najbardziej tak i ten most trafil do rzadowego programu mostowego, koncepcja zapewne przerysowana zostala z mapki, ktora np jest w tym artykule. https://samorzad.pap.pl/klub-samorzadowy/kozienice/kategoria/aktualnosci/kozienice-jest-decyzja-srodowiskowa-ws-budo... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-28 09:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | To jest z 2023Coś się ruszyło od tego czasu? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-28 09:47 | voltairovicz ♦202 | Nie mam pojęcia. Nie śledzę wszystkich projektów szczerze. Na szybko sprawdziłem artykuł z września 2024 że były jakies odwołania od decyzji środowiskowej, ale nie ma żadnych przesłanek, by miało się zrezygnować z tego mostu, może czeka na finansowanie, np jakiś most w lubusk... | |
| 163522950 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-03-12 11:18 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:30 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166834983 |
| 2 | 2025-05-27 16:38 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285896258/history - skąd twoje przekonanie że "Wadi-Ostsee" to nazwa co jest tutaj lokalnie używana? | |
| 164521537 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-04-04 17:38 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:37 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166835264 |
| 162219696 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-02-06 19:09 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:36 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166835245 |
| 161643467 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-01-22 15:48 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:36 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166835238 |
| 164391114 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-04-01 19:43 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166835128 |
| 162627243 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-02-17 18:08 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166835108 |
| 162937787 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-02-25 15:33 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:32 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166835076 |
| 164178238 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-03-27 18:53 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:32 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166835065 |
| 165439262 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-04-25 19:14 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:32 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166835053 |
| 161905897 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-01-29 16:55 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:31 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166835017 |
| 163220323 by Feskil @ 2025-03-04 21:28 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:29 | Mateusz Konieczny | jak po cmentarzu nie zachowały się żadne pozostałości terenowe to nie powinien być mapowany w OSM |
| 164649036 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-04-07 19:00 | 1 | 2025-05-21 11:47 | Mateusz Konieczny | Skąd ta nazy które tu dodano w tej edycji? Z jakiego źródła się biorą? |
| 2 | 2025-05-21 15:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | I jak to się stało że raz nazwa jedna a potem druga? Skąd się wzięły? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-21 21:47 | SpinOff ♦288 | Mamy chyba wandala. Lokalsi już poprawili te zmiany:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166559356Tu jest jeszcze lepszy changeset:https://osmcha.org/changesets/164648345 | |
| 4 | 2025-05-23 12:36 | Mateusz Konieczny | link które nie wymaga logowania w zewnętrznym serwisie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164648345 | |
| 5 | 2025-05-27 16:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | @Map_Rivers skąd te nazwy?Czy jakiekolwiek twoje edycje nie są niszczeniem danych?Czy powinny być wszystkie wycofane? | |
| 166617410 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-05-22 14:57 | 1 | 2025-05-23 10:03 | Bartek93ZGL ♦25 | Witam, Mam jedno zasadnicze pytanie. Skąd wziąłeś nazwę tego kanału "Incia". Ani ja jako mieszkaniec gminy Goleniów, który interesuję się lokalnymi nazwami, ani żadne inne źródło (PRNG, Wody Polskie), nie są znane mi takie nazwy. Jakiś czas temu w okolic... |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 10:20 | grzegorz75jan ♦452 | Jeżeli nie odpowie w ciągu dwóch dni to wycofaj jego zminę(y). Możesz też wcześniej wrzucić jego sprawę na forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zglaszanie-i-prosby-o-sprawdzenie-kont-edycji-uzytkownikow/110854/177Pełno takich malarzy. --- ... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 12:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | ze względu na brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 mimo blokady i to że wygląda ta osoba na wandala - czekanie dwa dni jest zbędne | |
| 4 | 2025-05-23 12:35 | Mateusz Konieczny | a, chwila blokady nie było jeszcze | |
| 5 | 2025-05-23 12:35 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofanie podejrzanych edycji z konta które odmawia wyjaśnienia https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166654160 | |
| 6 | 2025-05-24 12:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | > jakiś czas temu w okolicy miejscowości Załom, dodawałeś jakieś nazwy rzek typu "Łabędzia rzeczka itp."te nazwy są zdjęte czy jeszcze tam wiszą? | |
| 7 | 2025-05-26 19:12 | Bartek93ZGL ♦25 | Nazwy zmieniłem na zgodne z PRNG lub usunąłem. | |
| 8 | 2025-05-27 16:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | @Map_Rivers skąd te nazwy?Czy jakiekolwiek twoje edycje nie są niszczeniem danych?Czy powinny być wszystkie wycofane? | |
| 166792595 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-05-26 18:22 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166834686 |
| 166788207 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-05-26 16:28 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166834686 |
| 166787544 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-05-26 16:14 | 1 | 2025-05-26 17:12 | pavvv ♦474 | Dlaczego stosujesz nawiasy w nazwach? Skąd pomyślałeś, że takie nazwy się stosuje? |
| 2 | 2025-05-27 16:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166834686 | |
| 166787132 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-05-26 16:05 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166834686 |
| 166786108 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-05-26 15:41 | 1 | 2025-05-27 16:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blockshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166834686 |
| 65881489 by 5R-MFT @ 2018-12-30 07:37 | 1 | 2025-05-27 15:22 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625839454/history has roof:type = hipped that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 156360240 by spesame @ 2024-09-08 16:37 | 1 | 2025-05-27 14:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1194050018/history has roof = 0 that was added in this editWhat this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means |
| 2 | 2025-05-27 15:00 | spesame ♦1 | Whoops! Was supposed to be roof:levels, I think it was a typo. | |
| 155054779 by kpv8 @ 2024-08-10 09:57 | 1 | 2025-05-27 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4777564 ?Na pewno to dalej Lotos? |
| 152309304 by MapleTrees @ 2024-06-06 01:35 | 1 | 2025-05-26 17:15 | Mateusz Konieczny | Are you sure it is Great Clips hairdresser of Hair Cuttery brand?AFAIK these are two distinct brands |
| 2 | 2025-05-26 17:41 | MapleTrees ♦4 | I definitely did not mean that. I'm not sure how I messed that up honestly. It is a Great Clips | |
| 3 | 2025-05-26 22:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | edited it then, thanks for a quick reply (and feel free to make editing fixing it!)also, thanks for mapping it in the first place! | |
| 163272095 by laurent-38 @ 2025-03-06 07:05 | 1 | 2025-05-26 14:25 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5379310993/history this edit changed shop=supermarket into shop=pet while leaving brand:wikidata brand:wikidata is about shop brand that was there earlier and should have been removedideally by ED itself, so I created https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/is... |
| 2 | 2025-05-26 14:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | I fixed this specific one, though not checked other POIs | |
| 3 | 2025-05-26 18:26 | laurent-38 ♦172 | Hi Mateusz,sorry for the oversight (I thought of removing brand and brand:wikipedia, but not brand:wikidata), and thanks for the correction.When editing a POI, it's not easy to spot which attributes should be deleted (brand, brand:*, website, contact:*, delivery, takeaway), and which on... | |
| 4 | 2025-05-26 22:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | oh yes, it is definitely tricky (that is why I also opened https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/909 issue so root cause will get fixed) | |
| 166679814 by StreetSurveyor @ 2025-05-24 03:06 | 1 | 2025-05-26 20:26 | Joseph R P ♦340 | Do you have an explanation for why this is correct aside from a supposed firsthand survey, particularly why a small side street should be tagged as primary and a small stretch of Route 114 should be tagged the same as Route 24? |
| 2 | 2025-05-26 21:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | given you asked already days ago in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164612039 - it should be fine to simply revert this edit by now | |
| 3 | 2025-05-26 21:46 | StreetSurveyor ♦105 | These are links to the highway sections. That’s why I tagged them as such. | |
| 4 | 2025-05-26 22:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | what about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19347806/history ? | |
| 5 | 2025-05-26 22:18 | StreetSurveyor ♦105 | I had that section as primary to match the section it connects to. | |
| 6 | 2025-05-26 23:22 | Joseph R P ♦340 | This road isn't a link though, it's a small frontage road providing access to a few houses. Cars are not using it by getting off Route 114 and then re-entering it. Side streets also are not classified based off the main roads they spur off of, because by that logic, Corys Lane should be tr... | |
| 7 | 2025-06-02 02:28 | Flap Slimy Outward ♦40 | I've never been to Rhode Island, but the unnamed residential road is not a freeway exit, the quintessential example of a motorway link. It provides direct access to a few houses, which is not something that an on/off ramp would do. | |
| 149676075 by Chris Sadler @ 2024-04-07 01:50 | 1 | 2025-05-26 16:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5746205038/history - is it Puma fuel station or Caltex fuel station?tags are quite confusing here |
| 166269616 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-05-14 17:52 | 1 | 2025-05-26 11:42 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363511710/history - skąd ta nazwa?Jesteś pewien że coś nazywane kanałem jest rzeką? |
| 161430058 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-01-16 18:48 | 1 | 2025-05-26 11:16 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532565342/history - skąd ta nazwa? |
| 162627078 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-02-17 18:05 | 1 | 2025-05-26 11:15 | Mateusz Konieczny | reverted as edit from suspicious account that refuses to explain their suspicious editshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166774064 |
| 166559356 by GminaKrokowa @ 2025-05-21 09:33 | 1 | 2025-05-26 11:12 | Mateusz Konieczny | Wielkie dzięki za poprawę, pozwoliło to na zauważenie problemuwygląda na to że ktoś celowo psuł, został zablokowany |
| 166704564 by maro21 @ 2025-05-24 16:20 | 1 | 2025-05-26 10:42 | Mateusz Konieczny | I am reverting that edit as it was done due to not understanding how building:part and layer work, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166704422https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166772764 |
| 158246410 by ODULANA OLUWATOYIN @ 2024-10-23 10:34 | 1 | 2025-04-11 11:03 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12281536885/historywhat was meant by amenity=shelter here?have you seen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=shelter page? |
| 2 | 2025-04-11 11:04 | Mateusz Konieczny | Also - have you mapped a private apartment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12281536875 ? | |
| 3 | 2025-04-11 19:16 | ODULANA OLUWATOYIN ♦6 | Hi Mateusz ,Thank you for your message. The community asset mapping for this was done by different individuals involved in the mapping process. Understanding what each feature mean might not be too specific. However, considering the community mapped, most features referred to as shelter would ... | |
| 4 | 2025-05-25 15:42 | Mateusz Konieczny | so, amenity-shelter as used here completely mismatches https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=shelter ?"where individuals reside in the community" - these can and should be simply mapped as a residential buildingdo you plan to repair this data? | |
| 5 | 2025-05-26 10:11 | ODULANA OLUWATOYIN ♦6 | Okay , this is noted, thank you.For data repair, i was wondering if one can download the data from this area directly to JOSM, so it can be edited manually.or do you mean that the data be reuploaded all over again? | |
| 6 | 2025-05-26 10:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | > if one can download the data from this area directly to JOSM, so it can be edited manually.definitely, it can be done with any OSM dataJOSM also has search allowing to locate problematic data, it can be used with TODO pluginif you need more help with repair feel free to ask for help... | |
| 162511003 by dmfr @ 2025-02-14 17:05 | 1 | 2025-05-25 14:16 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4774847 ? |
| 2 | 2025-05-25 22:28 | dmfr ♦53 | Thank you for bringing this up, I've fixed this. You can see a better description in the comment I added to your note. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-26 07:40 | Mateusz Konieczny | thanks for fixing it! | |
| 164440736 by MrMagic7 @ 2025-04-02 21:41 | 1 | 2025-04-03 02:20 | GA_Kevin ♦22 | Hi MrMagic7,I live in the bordering Bluepool community, and drive by this location everyday, it has been there for months, and should be captured in OSM. The brick-and-mortar location is further up on Bemiss. Can you please restore this node? Thanks!-- GA_Kevin |
| 2 | 2025-04-10 20:44 | MrMagic7 ♦2 | That node was for a food truck which is not there everyday. I've drive by when it has been gone. Should we have points for places that are mobile? | |
| 3 | 2025-04-11 15:43 | GA_Kevin ♦22 | It's a good question. I havent seen it move but if you have maybe best to ask the forum for guidance. Seems to me like useful info (ive eaten there - its okay) | |
| 4 | 2025-05-25 21:41 | silversurfer83 ♦3,391 | Hi :)This https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:street_vendor%3DyesLists food trucks as an example.MrMagic7, please don't delete food truck locations. Thank you.If there are questions, please see the wiki, visit c.osm.org or maybe slackHappy mapping | |
| 5 | 2025-05-26 01:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | food truck that is not there 100% of the time, but typically is there is mappable, so I will readd ithttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166755859 | |
| 6 | 2025-05-26 01:10 | Mateusz Konieczny | See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/removal-of-a-permanent-food-truck/130564 | |
| 166755859 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-05-26 01:08 | 1 | 2025-05-26 01:09 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/removal-of-a-permanent-food-truck/130564/3 |
| 166741846 by Acredrom7 @ 2025-05-25 16:09 | 1 | 2025-05-25 20:44 | Mateusz Konieczny | dzięki za poprawki! |
| 68944865 by Artek @ 2019-04-06 07:08 | 1 | 2025-05-22 13:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | Skąd informacja że jest tu elektrownia wodna?Twój link nijak w source= tego nie podaje |
| 2 | 2025-05-25 09:43 | Artek ♦17 | "Po kilku latach na jego ruinie powstała mała elektrownia wodna, nigdy jednak nie uruchomiona (!!!)" | |
| 3 | 2025-05-25 11:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Czy nazwa "Mała Elektrownia Wodna Szczekociny" jest zgadnięta/wymyślona/opisem czy rzeczywistą nazwą? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-25 18:00 | Artek ♦17 | Tak się nazywa zwyczajowo takie obiekty. Kiedyś był challenge związany z energetyką i źródłami prądu to takie elektrownie tak były ponazywane. | |
| 5 | 2025-05-25 20:43 | Mateusz Konieczny | ale tu tej elektrowni nie ma więc nazwa i rzekoma elektrownia do skasowanie jest | |
| 158991590 by Baloo Uriza @ 2024-11-11 02:44 | 1 | 2025-03-21 06:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1022142242/history has shop = buildings that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)shop=buildings ? Is someone selling real estate (build houses)? Ready-to-build wooden houses on your property? |
| 2 | 2025-03-21 12:02 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,108 | Literally drive up with a trailer and take home a shed or tiny house. A surprisingly common business in the region. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-25 20:29 | Mateusz Konieczny | maybe shop=mobile_house would work? or are these mobile only once, you can drive them to your area but after that these are not movable?shop=tiny_house_or_shed ? A bit silly but clearly distinguishes it from selling real estate or building materialsmaybe there is a better tag for that? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-25 23:56 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,108 | I'm open for suggestions, I'm just shallow on them after getting shot down on shop=buildings | |
| 16550200 by repa40x @ 2013-06-14 13:13 | 1 | 2025-05-14 19:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1394936439/history has shop = electrotools that was added in this editshop=electrotools ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is shop=electrotools used intentionally instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=power_tools ? If yes, what is the d... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 19:46 | repa40x ♦1 | hello Mateusz, It used to be recommended tag in ru osm wiki. Shop sells power tools. I'm not sure it still exists but we can update tag to shop=power_tools | |
| 3 | 2025-05-25 18:20 | Mateusz Konieczny | I applied this change | |
| 163171951 by Tom5734 @ 2025-03-03 17:52 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9214300231/history has amenity = water that was added in this editamenity=water? What is this?If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typicallyused.man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.man_made=water_tap w... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 16:10 | Tom5734 ♦1 | man_made=water_tapdrinking_water=no | |
| 3 | 2025-05-25 18:18 | Mateusz Konieczny | applied | |
| 166633477 by sebixordon @ 2025-05-23 00:04 | 1 | 2025-05-25 15:31 | Mateusz Konieczny | please, do not add fake street names just because OM is brokenhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166740351 |
| 2 | 2025-05-25 15:32 | Mateusz Konieczny | Czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8650954236 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8650924204 rzeczywiście mają inne kody pocztowe? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-27 21:07 | sebixordon ♦1 | Mój błąd. Kody zostały źle poprawione | |
| 141670604 by HBanu @ 2023-09-24 07:55 | 1 | 2025-05-25 14:20 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4774853 ? |
| 104507342 by Mauls @ 2021-05-11 10:56 | 1 | 2024-05-01 11:58 | SomeoneElse2 ♦455 | As with many of your other edits, you'd managed to duplicate an existing feature (now a footpath, formerly a railway) in the wrong place, possibly because you have never actually been there and are relying on poor quality aerial imagery.I've corrected this example of the problem in https... |
| 2 | 2024-08-06 14:12 | Mauls ♦28 | As with the other edits you’ve commented on, this was from over 3 years ago. I’ve taken the advice on board quite some time ago. I’m not sure what purpose repeatedly making this exact same point on quite old edits serves? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-25 14:06 | Mateusz Konieczny | Probably because data damage remains unfixed? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-25 14:10 | Mateusz Konieczny | And "but there are many others along this line" is a polite suggestion to you to fix this damage.So to be more specific: I am asking you to repair this problem, and to delete railway lines you added to OSM that nowadays are utterly gone without any traces. | |
| 164281077 by James Derrick @ 2025-03-30 10:28 | 1 | 2025-04-21 07:30 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12712811269/history - that was supposed to be barrier=gate, right? |
| 2 | 2025-04-21 19:11 | James Derrick ♦78 | Hi again Mateusz,Yes - correct!JOSM seems to have a memory leak on a Linux JVM which can break keyboard input, causing corruption with a macro keypad (odd that it creates a repeat).I often manage to catch these errors, but you tooling is more reliable than I am! :-)Happy Mapping,Ja... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-25 13:00 | Mateusz Konieczny | is it the same memory leak that sometimes causes input to stop working completely? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-27 08:48 | James Derrick ♦78 | Could well be - I've seen keyboard fail completely (but not mouse) on GNOME/OpenJDK where opening a terminal and typing can sometimes unblock it, and this one where input seems to slow down, or even repeat text in odd ways.In all cases, restarting JOSM fixes input, but then you've got ... | |
| 154705319 by Berend Veldkamp @ 2024-08-01 17:58 | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11708283250/history has shop = stamps that was added in this editshop=coin ? Maybe it can be better tagged as shop=collector collector=stamps as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcollector suggests?Or maybe shop=stamps should be documemted... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 20:51 | Berend Veldkamp ♦8 | Yes, that looks good | |
| 3 | 2025-05-14 20:53 | Berend Veldkamp ♦8 | Collector=stamps;coins would be even better :-) | |
| 4 | 2025-05-25 08:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | applied in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166725059 | |
| 166622240 by Aim311_ @ 2025-05-22 16:57 | 1 | 2025-05-23 20:35 | Yog Sot ♦229 | skąd wiesz, że droga ma wstęp prywatny skoro patrzyłeś tylko na zdjęcia oraz dlaczego kasujesz scieżki, które zmapowane zostały w oparciu o survey lub zdjęcia z poziomu ulicy?private access stosuje się wyłącznie jak jest zakaz wstępu np poprzez bramę lub szlaban. Pytanie... |
| 2 | 2025-05-24 07:58 | Aim311_ ♦109 | Bo tam byłem, wszedłem na teren i kilka chwil później podjechało auto z podwójną obsadą prosząc mnie uprzejmie o opuszczenie prywatnego terenu? Skąd wiem? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-24 07:59 | Aim311_ ♦109 | Te ścieżki, o których wspominasz to raczej fikcja, chyba że jakiś lokals sobie je robi.Byłeś tam w ogóle? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-24 08:03 | Aim311_ ♦109 | W sensie wiem, że ty tą ścieżkę i inne zrobiłeś na postawie pojedynczych śladów gps sic! Na oko. Przechodzące nawet przez budynki np. we Wronkach!! | |
| 5 | 2025-05-24 11:39 | Yog Sot ♦229 | okej, nerwy mnie poniosły, sprawa wyjasniona na discord. Tylko część dróg kwalifikuje sie jako `private` | |
| 6 | 2025-05-24 12:43 | Mateusz Konieczny | "private access stosuje się wyłącznie jak jest zakaz wstępu np poprzez bramę lub szlaban. "całkowita bzdura, nie tylko wtedyskąd taki pomysł?np. tabliczka "poligon wojskowy, zakaz wstępu" czy "teren zaminowany, zakaz wstępu" czy ścieżka idąca nieleg... | |
| 7 | 2025-05-24 16:41 | Yog Sot ♦229 | ale tabliczka "teren prywatny" wcale wstępu nie zakazuje, tylko wyłącznie o tym informuje. To prywata wtedy decyduje jakie są zasady wstępu i poruszania się na ich terenie i w każdej chwili jak pozwolili wcześniej na stęp, to mogą jednak zmienić zdanie i to jest definicja `per... | |
| 8 | 2025-05-24 16:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | > ale tabliczka "teren prywatny" wcale wstępu nie zakazuje, tylko wyłącznie o tym informuje. ale tabliczka "teren prywatny, zakaz wstępu" już zakazuje i jeżeli nie jest celowo mylna to jest to powód by dawać access=private | |
| 9 | 2025-05-24 17:16 | Yog Sot ♦229 | no i znów, jak mozna zobaczyc taką tabliczkę ze zdjęć lotniczych? no raczej trzeba się udać na miejsce, co oboje jak sie okazuje jednak zrobiliśmy, i takich tabliczek jak ty to opisujesz tam nie ma. Inna kwestia, że nie masz racji, że tabliczka z zakazem wstępu go zakazuje... bo m... | |
| 10 | 2025-05-25 06:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | > no i znów, jak mozna zobaczyc taką tabliczkę ze zdjęć lotniczych?A co to ma do rzeczy? W tej dyskusji masz już odpowiedź "tam byłem" kilka postów wyżej"bo musi być faktycznie jednoznacznie określona dla np drogi."o ty też wspominałem - tra... | |
| 154022889 by GrandF @ 2024-07-16 16:06 Active block | 1 | 2024-07-16 16:34 | opendcc ♦1,534 | Hello, please consider https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments and please reduce the areal size of your changeset.best regards |
| 2 | 2024-07-16 19:10 | silversurfer83 ♦3,391 | Hi :)thank you for your contribiution.In this changeset you made very minor edits all over the world (mostly geometry of some highways) and you set one bridge somewhere in Asia to "access=no". Can you please provide so sources for these changes?And as opendcc already mentioned:... | |
| 3 | 2024-08-02 10:10 | Mateusz Konieczny | Do you remember which bridge was affected? Maybe it should be reverted, this edit look quite dubious... | |
| 4 | 2024-08-02 10:40 | silversurfer83 ♦3,391 | Dear Mateusz,All their edits look quite dubious. Nearly all have major deletions in Ukraine while also editing some things all over the world.Also: No communication, no comment, no source. I am close to reporting this to DWG while I already mentioned this account to the Ukrainian community a... | |
| 5 | 2024-08-03 11:35 | Mateusz Konieczny | that looks like this extra items across world were added solely to mask vandalism | |
| 6 | 2024-08-06 13:48 | Mateusz Konieczny | @silversurfer83 Have you either investigated it yet or reported to DWG? | |
| 7 | 2024-08-06 14:17 | silversurfer83 ♦3,391 | @mateusz neither, sorry. I will bump my post, though. Maybe someone from Ukraine will notice | |
| 8 | 2024-08-11 02:03 | silversurfer83 ♦3,391 | @Mateusz I mailed the DWG | |
| 9 | 2025-05-15 17:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | I tried using http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=154022889 but it timed out | |
| 10 | 2025-05-24 18:10 | Mateusz Konieczny | Maybe https://osmcha.org/changesets/154022889 will manage | |
| 166304866 by Ziębicki @ 2025-05-15 13:21 | 1 | 2025-05-21 21:20 | Szpic ♦9 | Nie ma czegoś takiego jak Błotnica Środkowa |
| 2 | 2025-05-24 17:43 | Mateusz Konieczny | skąd to wiesz że tego nie ma? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-24 17:43 | Mateusz Konieczny | @Ziębicki skąd wiesz że to istnieje pod taką nazwą? | |
| 163391476 by KhubsuratInsaan @ 2025-03-09 09:08 | 1 | 2025-05-08 18:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12647084497/history has shop = grinding_mill that was added in this editshop=grinding_mill ? is it providing some service to general public ? Or is it man_made=works? Or is it company office (office=company)? |
| 2 | 2025-05-08 18:35 | KhubsuratInsaan ♦8 | hello. this is a shop where common wheat is turned into atta (the word atta is in the name). can i improve the tags? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 18:52 | Mateusz Konieczny | is it place open to general public?where you go to grind your grains?or is it more of internal place, where general public does not go in but makes things sold elsewhere? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-16 02:11 | KhubsuratInsaan ♦8 | it is a public shop, which is as accessible as nearby convenience stores | |
| 5 | 2025-05-16 15:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | then shop=grinding_mill makes senseit may be useful to document it on wiki(in some ways a bit similar to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending%3Drice_polishing - though Japan being Japan has it done via vending machines) | |
| 6 | 2025-05-24 15:03 | Mateusz Konieczny | Are you maybe interested in creating wiki documentation for it? I can help with that | |
| 7 | 2025-05-24 15:11 | KhubsuratInsaan ♦8 | oops sorry i forgot to reply to your previous message. i have already created that page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dgrinding_mill. it is pretty barebones i have to admit. it does not even have a photo to display since i wasn't able to found one online. (i might a upload photo... | |
| 8 | 2025-05-24 17:02 | Mateusz Konieczny | thanks! And photo would be nice, these are not present in my area so I will not help with thisI added note that it does not apply to all grinding mills (these may be also part of industrial food factory or bakery...) | |
| 166088654 by Yog Sot @ 2025-05-10 22:53 | 1 | 2025-05-24 16:47 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757341656/history gdzie te pozostałości zostały i zobaczyć można? |
| 40711244 by Hb- @ 2016-07-13 12:48 | 1 | 2025-05-11 20:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4300486916/history has shop = oil that was added in this editshop=oil ? Is it a shop selling edible oil? Engine oil? Fuel oil? Something else?Is this shop even existing? |
| 2 | 2025-05-11 21:52 | Hb- ♦286 | "Mineralöle" is German for oil harvested by mining/drilling etc.The company sells energy and exists still today. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 17:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | is it an actual shop or company office? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-23 19:15 | Hb- ♦286 | Both. Mostly office. They even sell CNG in steel bottles. | |
| 5 | 2025-05-24 11:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | so shop=fuel office=company ? | |
| 6 | 2025-05-24 14:06 | Hb- ♦286 | Seems fine | |
| 7 | 2025-05-24 15:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | changed it then | |
| 165955995 by deichzerleger @ 2025-05-07 20:12 | 1 | 2025-05-07 22:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238524846 is segregated=yes correct here? |
| 2 | 2025-05-08 04:28 | deichzerleger ♦3 | see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1142484960167829&focus=photo | |
| 3 | 2025-05-08 09:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | it is not loading for me :( | |
| 4 | 2025-05-24 15:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | but cycleway crossing is already mapped as a separate line - so https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238524846 should not get segregated=yes | |
| 156572318 by shlerksofftorobots @ 2024-09-13 13:26 | 1 | 2025-05-05 07:06 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367006769/history - what emergency=no is supposed to mean? |
| 2 | 2025-05-05 07:06 | Mateusz Konieczny | that police and fire trucks are banned from going there? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-24 14:36 | Mateusz Konieczny | send PM https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1256665 | |
| 4 | 2025-05-24 14:38 | shlerksofftorobots ♦4 | Sorry for not responding... I assume the editor I used had that in the template, and I either set the wrong value or or was set to no by default. You can probably revert. | |
| 153078942 by une abeille @ 2024-06-23 17:39 | 1 | 2024-10-25 13:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | name=Chandelhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12003570067shop=import ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_ke... |
| 2 | 2024-10-26 12:58 | une abeille ♦115 | Imported clothing, jewelry, artisan goods, incense, musical instruments. This shop specializes in a wide variety of goods imported from Nepal. Believe me, I had to think pretty hard about how to tag this one.Such "import shops" are pretty common in places I've lived. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-24 13:37 | Mateusz Konieczny | then maybe this shop value should be documented at OSM Wiki?would you be interested in doing this? I can help if you want | |
| 4 | 2025-05-24 14:37 | une abeille ♦115 | I am not interested in participating in OSM community spaces at this time. | |
| 166615012 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-05-22 13:59 | 1 | 2025-05-22 20:28 | grzegorz75jan ♦452 | Wiem. Dlatego wtedy dałem lepsze lub gorsze disused by nie dodano ich przypadkiem ponownie.Ciekawe czy zniknie budynek nr. 6 bo dach już dziurawy. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166615012 |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 10:12 | Mateusz Konieczny | no, teraz nie ma ich już na zdjęciach lotniczych | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 10:52 | grzegorz75jan ♦452 | Na orto czasowej już nie ma. Może i w czasie mojego dłubania też ich nie było (i tak byłem tam na pogrzebie). Na wysokiej rozdziałce są. Być może wtedy były jeszcze na podkładzie obrysów budynków ale faktycznie już czas i dobrze, że usunąłeś.Popatrz z łaski swoj... | |
| 4 | 2025-05-24 12:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | plac wokół kościoła taki zły nie jest, można w sumie to jako plac traktować | |
| 164950629 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-04-14 17:46 | 1 | 2025-05-24 12:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340589446/historyskąd ta nazwa? Używa ktoś jej poza tobą?pytam się bo dodałeś nazwy które wyglądają na wandalizm i mimo https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18272 brak odpowiedzi na pytania w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/16661... |
| 166667942 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-05-23 17:56 | 1 | 2025-05-24 12:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | edycja wycofana ponieważ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 ihttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 pozostają niewyjaśnione a wyglądają na celowe niszczenie danychhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166696169 |
| 148567660 by Yog Sot @ 2024-03-12 21:12 | 1 | 2025-05-24 12:46 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083022129/history - to ona istnieje czy nie?Bo jak nie to powinna być skasowana a nie dostawać note |
| 154484484 by Aim311_ @ 2024-07-27 13:27 | 1 | 2025-05-24 12:46 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083022129/history - to ona istnieje czy nie?Bo jak nie to powinna być skasowana a nie dostawac note |
| 162299556 by amy101 @ 2025-02-09 01:45 | 1 | 2025-05-11 20:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1358242411/history has shop = oil that was added in this editshop=oil ? Is it a shop selling edible oil? Engine oil? Fuel oil? Something else?Is this shop even existing? |
| 2 | 2025-05-11 21:05 | amy101 ♦1 | This is a shop that makes/distributes oil used for roads and asphalt. It is very much still in existence. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 11:22 | Mateusz Konieczny | is it also selling it there? is shop where you can walk in and order some?or are they only making it there? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-24 00:58 | amy101 ♦1 | They make it there. However, this is also where the oil is stored. So many tankers are filled every morning to ship it out. You cannot walk over there and buy it. The main shop is on the corner of Carlin and 6th Street. | |
| 5 | 2025-05-24 11:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | So it would be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dworks or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dcompany ?Maybe this building should have office=company node and this entire industrial area man_made=works ? Or are there other businesses there using other storage tanks? | |
| 148236930 by ph4ni @ 2024-03-05 07:35 | 1 | 2025-04-18 16:15 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11693235942/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-04-20 08:00 | ph4ni ♦7 | It is a service center for Trucks of brand "Ashok Leyland"fixme:type \tAshok Leyland service | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 11:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | so it is place where you would repair trucks, right? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-23 13:29 | ph4ni ♦7 | yes. EveryDoor does not have presets for Truck Dealer or Truck service does it? | |
| 5 | 2025-05-24 11:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | it seems soiD presets used by iD do not have themthere is https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/1213 for shop=truck=repairI see no such issue for shop=truck, I guess it can be raised | |
| 160523188 by BudgieInWA @ 2024-12-23 04:31 | 1 | 2025-04-21 09:38 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12443035605/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-04-21 10:23 | BudgieInWA ♦26 | It is a place where you pay to go and paint pottery that you get to take home. I don't know the correct tagging. Somewhat like a "paint and sip" place. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 17:12 | Mateusz Konieczny | are you also making pottery there? or are you just painting already prepared one? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-24 03:17 | BudgieInWA ♦26 | Only painting pre-made pieces. | |
| 5 | 2025-05-24 10:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | No idea how to tag those, started https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-tag-place-where-you-come-in-to-paint-prepared-pottery-and-take-it-home/130501 | |
| 154539410 by Davidos64 @ 2024-07-28 21:37 | 1 | 2025-05-14 19:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12079124410/history has shop = cbd that was added in this editshop=cbd ? What kind of shop, if any is here? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=cannabis - is shop=cannabis intentionally not used here? |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 21:49 | Davidos64 ♦8 | Oops I forgot that one, you can edit it | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 13:12 | Mateusz Konieczny | to shop=cannabis, right? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-15 14:55 | Davidos64 ♦8 | Yes | |
| 5 | 2025-05-23 20:48 | Mateusz Konieczny | changed | |
| 119355306 by LivingWithDragons @ 2022-04-05 18:21 | 1 | 2025-05-14 13:44 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9643922962/history has shop = specialist that was added in this editshop=specialist ? But what kind of specialist shop? Is it specializing in fruit and vegetables? Dog collars? Herbs? Shoe repair? Something else? Is any of values from https://wiki.openstre... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 13:58 | LivingWithDragons ♦52 | Sorry, I added that shop 3 years ago and I can't remember what it had in the window.I do recall that area of Morecambe being very volatile with shops, it's possible the shop has since changed name and type. As such, it would benefit from resurveying much more than it would benefit from... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 20:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | the problem is that I have no info needed to fix tagging here, I hoped that you maybe remember it or able to recheckif neither applies: sorry for bothering you! | |
| 63050520 by Perimex @ 2018-09-29 23:14 | 1 | 2025-05-16 08:30 | Mateusz Konieczny | Czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/629121627/history jest w jakichś realnych planach? Jakich? |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 17:45 | Mateusz Konieczny | okazuje się że te twoje wadliwe edycje straszą ludzi: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/polnocna-obwodnica-milanowka-skad-sie-tu-wziela/130426 | |
| 164603910 by samuelzammit @ 2025-04-06 18:14 | 1 | 2025-04-22 07:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12734574678/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-04-22 08:08 | samuelzammit ♦3 | Hi, this edit was made by mistake, I fixed the wrong tag.I wasn't sure what to tag this as, it's a "beach shop" where you can rent e.g. umbrellas and sunbeds as opposed to a "resort" | |
| 3 | 2025-05-09 16:27 | Mateusz Konieczny | do you rent stuff there or also buy it?not sure whether both should be covered by say shop=beach | |
| 4 | 2025-05-13 12:53 | samuelzammit ♦3 | Hi Mateusz,I visited the area again today and verified that the site acts as both a restaurant/bar as well as being able to rent (for example) kayaks. I believe that in this case the tag amenity:restaurant is the most appropriate. | |
| 5 | 2025-05-23 17:42 | Mateusz Konieczny | I se that you fixed it! Thanks!I guess that shop=kayak_rental or shop=rental can be added to the POI or as an extra separate POI | |
| 166652243 by rafcho @ 2025-05-23 11:53 | 1 | 2025-05-23 14:43 | gotitim ♦3 | Cześć, ulice, które nie są jeszcze w budowie oznaczamy jako highway=proposed, szczególnie jak nie jest to dokładny wygląd tylko przybliżony. |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 17:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | a jak nawet zaprojektowana nie jest to i highway=proposed jest wątpliwe | |
| 157519531 by Barroszt @ 2024-10-05 22:31 Active block | 1 | 2024-10-22 21:35 | uprkos ♦38 | Przejrzyj proszę edycje pod kątem literówek:Kkasnal - raczej Krasnal Meblornia - Mebloria Aegro - Agro |
| 2 | 2025-05-05 16:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | Skąd ta nazwa? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10116803158 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-06 11:18 | Dawid2849 ♦709 | @Mateusz Konieczny https://prowly-prod.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/uploads/landing_page/template_background/37463/large_info_prasa1440x770.jpg | |
| 4 | 2025-05-23 17:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | W jaki sposób zweryfikowałeś https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10759175614 ? Jesteś pewien tej nazwy? | |
| 5 | 2025-06-30 19:01 | Barroszt Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 166665836 by Maria Piotr Walkowiak @ 2025-05-23 16:56 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-23 17:00 | Mateusz Konieczny | Zapoznaj się z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian i zastosuj to |
| 166487223 by Maria Piotr Walkowiak @ 2025-05-19 16:57 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-23 15:20 | YomanNH ♦306 | Co to za fikcja? Droga jest w budowie. Dodatkowo usunąłeś istniejącą drogę https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1316624232, przez co wszyscy musieli zjeżdżać na Węźle Polesińskiego (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11032996760). Wycofałem ten wandalizm. |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 15:28 | grzegorz75jan ♦452 | Oznaczyłem w OSMCha jako DWG. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166487223 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 16:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | Co rozumiessz przez opis edycji "Podane hasła nie są jednakowe"?Czy ona jest celowo bełkotem?Skąd wymysł że https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1333743357/history jest zbudowana? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-23 19:25 | YomanNH ♦306 | Nie tylko ta droga była "zbudowana". Ta fikcja ciągnęła się aż po zajezdnię tramwajową i to obie jezdnie... | |
| 148897651 by mol_an @ 2024-03-20 08:16 | 1 | 2025-04-23 09:43 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11747434798/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-05-12 15:46 | mol_an ♦3 | Hi, seems to be a concrete building in the woods, probably a transformer substation (electronic). There's also a fire prohibition sign next to it. Need to investigate further during a future hike to the location... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 16:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | building is mapped already - is this amenity=fixme object needed/useful? | |
| 160125534 by nashnaufal @ 2024-12-10 11:28 | 1 | 2025-03-03 18:22 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11612731354 - how you know that this building abandoned?why note refers to rebuilding it if it exists?why "In comparing imagery from 2023 and the current Esri imagery from Feb 2024 - this building looks abandoned on the latest imagery. People however m... |
| 2 | 2025-05-05 09:07 | Mateusz Konieczny | I am planning to (soon) remove all this notesplease, at least reply have you tried to map building that is destroyed or one that is abandoned | |
| 3 | 2025-05-12 14:19 | Jorieke V ♦16 | Hi Mateusz, apologies for following up only now, as in the other comment I left (in here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160127304#map=15/13.43230/22.41271), this mapping was done by my intern who is not working with us any longer. This is however not an excuse and I should have double c... | |
| 4 | 2025-05-12 14:30 | Jorieke V ♦16 | The goal of these notes was to mention what buildings were burnt down and thus abandoned. If you check the currently available Esri imagery (which are of Feb 2024) you can clearly see the difference with the older available imagery such as with Bing. The area was carefully scanned and consequently t... | |
| 5 | 2025-05-12 14:35 | Jorieke V ♦16 | I'm wondering as well how I could have spotted this changeset comment of yours earlier. The mapper was using the #msf #missingmaps #darfur hashtags that are all noted in our MSF wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%C3%A9decins_Sans_Fronti%C3%A8res#Ongoing) - but please any suggestio... | |
| 6 | 2025-05-12 14:38 | Jorieke V ♦16 | For next - I understand that you went ahead with the removal because you did not get any reply. However, it would still be great to have this information back onto OSM. How would you suggest for us to do this? Also, I have a couple of days ago started a post on to the OSM forum to ask for help ... | |
| 7 | 2025-05-12 15:16 | Jorieke V ♦16 | For additional info, this is a photo of how houses would look like when tagged with this note: https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/news-feature/2021/4/8/whats-behind-the-rising-violence-in-sudans-darfur | |
| 8 | 2025-05-13 12:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | Part of reason why I revert these is that there were some problem.Message was referring to houses, even for building within schools and markets.Also, note was also on nodes, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11575953745/historyFor mass edits like this one you should have followed ht... | |
| 9 | 2025-05-13 12:56 | Mateusz Konieczny | "In comparing imagery from 2023 and the current Esri imagery from Feb 2024 - this building looks abandoned on the latest imagery" was also dubious given mass adding it to every single buildinghas really every single structure been abandoned here? | |
| 10 | 2025-05-13 12:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | > For additional info, this is a photo of how houses would look like when tagged with this note: https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/news-feature/2021/4/8/whats-behind-the-rising-violence-in-sudans-darfurthese kind of damage is definitely mappable, though I am not sure how (https://wiki.op... | |
| 11 | 2025-05-13 13:28 | Mateusz Konieczny | > but please any suggestions are welcome to keep track of changeset comments with certain hashtags better. Is there a tool that I am not aware of? no idea about any currently existing tools here, I guess you can ask on OSM forum? | |
| 12 | 2025-05-14 06:35 | Mateusz Konieczny | > How would you suggest for us to do this? are you interested in marking specific heavily damaged buildings or general area where many buildings are damaged? | |
| 13 | 2025-05-15 13:24 | Jorieke V ♦16 | Thanks for you messages Mateusz! There is a lot of info here now - I was not aware of the automated edits code of conduct - I will carefully read. Amazing that you started this page on ruined buildings! How can I interact best to that - Or is there a different/better way. Probably not on this chan... | |
| 14 | 2025-05-15 13:25 | Jorieke V ♦16 | > Also, note was also on nodes, see osm.org/node/11575953745/historyYes, thanks for correcting, that was a clear mistake! | |
| 15 | 2025-05-15 13:28 | Jorieke V ♦16 | > no idea about any currently existing tools here, I guess you can ask on OSM forum?For a potential tool - I have asked someone within HeiGit if they are aware - and maybe they can come up with something. I keep the forum in my head. | |
| 16 | 2025-05-23 12:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | oh, I see you found a thread already: thanks for commenting there! | |
| 164648345 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-04-07 18:41 | 1 | 2025-05-23 12:36 | Mateusz Konieczny | Skąd te nazwy? Sam je wymyślasz?http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=164648345 |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 12:37 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofanie podejrzanych edycji z konta które odmawia wyjaśnienia https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166654260 | |
| 120478561 by Martin868 @ 2022-05-02 20:57 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:27 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9710057122/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgue... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 20:15 | Martin868 ♦61 | I am not sure. It is what we call a Pourvoirie, which is a place that provide lodging and other services for people that go either fishing and/or hunting. So it is not really an hotel accommodation in the classic sense, people there are going for the other services. It is not really a hostel. It is ... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 12:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | "people there are going for the other services" I think it is not a deal breakeryou sometimes have a bit weird hotels with some custom attractions | |
| 127249715 by o_andras @ 2022-10-09 13:49 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:27 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/410256143/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgues... |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 11:30 | o_andras ♦57 | Hey, thanks for the comment. I can't remember what lead me to tag it this way (maybe it was the EveryDoor preset?), but tourism=hotel might be more appropriate despite the name -- these are, after all, pretty fancy hotels. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 14:05 | topolusitania ♦218 | "Pousada" as "Parador" in Spain indicates a State owned hotel | |
| 4 | 2025-05-23 11:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | edited in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166650821thanks for a reply! | |
| 149304805 by Sci-fi @ 2024-03-29 10:25 | 1 | 2025-05-08 22:02 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11771028709/history has surface = turf that was added in this editWhat is this? surface=artificial_turf or surface=grass? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dturf |
| 2 | 2025-05-08 22:34 | Sci-fi ♦1 | Surface = real grass | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 11:20 | Mateusz Konieczny | fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166650737 | |
| 132994662 by Sam Wilson @ 2023-02-25 07:18 | 1 | 2025-04-11 08:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10692445729/history has fixme:type = office that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)What kind of office is here?If unclear, maybe office=yes would fit? Already more clear than hopeless amenity=fixmeSee https://wiki.openstreetmap.... |
| 2 | 2025-04-11 08:42 | Sam Wilson ♦33 | You're right, I should've opened a note instead! I'm not sure why I couldn't determine the office (or perhaps this is a case of EveryDoor's preset making something look odd?).I shall walk past there and re-survey the building. There are few offices that open to Wray Ave,... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 11:16 | Mateusz Konieczny | I would say that ED behavior in this case is a bug, I reported https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880 some time ago | |
| 141005569 by Anas masuris @ 2023-09-08 23:19 | 1 | 2025-05-22 14:56 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146934445/history - są podstawy by sądzić że to realne plany? |
| 2 | 2025-05-22 15:24 | Anas masuris ♦115 | To proszę się pytać użytkownika SzybkieDrogi, który tę drogę naniósł. Jedyne, co mogę powiedzieć, to to, że rondo w Kałęczynie jest przygotowane do konstrukcji drogi w stronę Odrano-Woli. Tylko tyle | |
| 3 | 2025-05-22 15:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | pytałem sie wszystkich którzy to edytowali - wolę się zapytać za dużo niż za mało | |
| 166534054 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-05-20 16:59 | 1 | 2025-05-22 15:06 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63050520 - autor edycji nie odpowiadanie edytuje od kilku latbył wielokrotnie blokowany za dodawanie swoich pomysłów jako realne plany - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1694A https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63050520 łama... |
| 133725450 by witekosz @ 2023-03-15 21:17 | 1 | 2025-05-22 14:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925258503/history - cokolwiek wskazuje na to by to były realne plany? |
| 115130343 by MCMardock @ 2021-12-19 15:37 | 1 | 2025-05-22 14:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201117497/history - cokolwiek wskazuje na to by to były realne plany? |
| 32609574 by rmikke @ 2015-07-13 18:19 | 1 | 2025-05-22 14:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201117497/history - cokolwiek wskazuje na to by to były realne plany? |
| 14648801 by RuteX @ 2013-01-14 14:32 | 1 | 2025-05-22 14:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201117497/history - cokolwiek wskazuje na to by to były realne plany? |
| 132665937 by SzybkieDrogi @ 2023-02-17 09:30 | 1 | 2023-02-18 10:14 | NieWnen ♦1,049 | Jakie jest tego źródło?Jest na to dokumentacja, albo chociaż koncepcja? |
| 2 | 2025-05-22 14:56 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146934445/history - są podstawy by sądzić że to realne plany? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-22 15:32 | Anas masuris ♦115 | Na szybko sprawdziłem w MPZP i jest jakaś projektowana droga. Przykład:https://pobierz.grodzisk.pl/www/plan2/rys/88_375_2020_odrano-wola_malarska-barwna-lazurowa.pdf | |
| 16758495 by mard91 @ 2013-06-29 22:11 | 1 | 2025-05-22 14:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228004820/history - są podstawy by sądzić że to jakieś realne plany? |
| 161555909 by kamen1 @ 2025-01-20 10:04 | 1 | 2025-01-20 10:31 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you use more clear edit descriptions? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_commentsOr at least specify source (in changeset comment or in changeset source field - second is admittedly a bit hidden in iD)At least giving hint is it based on survey or from other source wou... |
| 2 | 2025-01-24 11:44 | Mateusz Konieczny | send PM ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1226879 ) | |
| 3 | 2025-05-22 13:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | got reply: "Yes, the company Petrol who owns Crodux, renovated it’s gas stations and added the new name Petrol." | |
| 4 | 2025-05-22 13:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | wait, go confused - that is reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140126528 | |
| 163060210 by Dasc3er @ 2025-02-28 16:30 | 1 | 2025-04-23 10:00 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626046637/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-05-17 11:38 | Dasc3er ♦2 | It is difficult to find an exact classification - the title (updated in a later change set) is "Centro Polifunzionale" with an emphasis on courses and consultancy , thus it may be a kind of social (?) center, but also a work center or even a community place. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-22 12:20 | Mateusz Konieczny | maybe office=yes for start would be OK?maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility | |
| 166260187 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-05-14 14:25 | 1 | 2025-05-22 12:08 | Mateusz Konieczny | Proszę używaj sensownych opisów zestawów zmian, patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian |
| 166603806 by eygenta @ 2025-05-22 09:43 | 1 | 2025-05-22 11:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | zmiany istotnych kategorii dróg trzeba przedyskutować na forum + używaj swojego zwykłego konta, proszęhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166608099 |
| 166604291 by eygenta @ 2025-05-22 09:52 | 1 | 2025-05-22 11:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | zmiany istotnych kategorii dróg trzeba przedyskutować na forum + używaj swojego zwykłego konta, proszęhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166608099 |
| 166596653 by MihanJhaveri @ 2025-05-22 06:40 | 1 | 2025-05-22 10:11 | Mateusz Konieczny | Please, read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 166554615 by Mechtal @ 2025-05-21 07:47 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-21 22:55 | olo81 ♦666 | Nazwa opisowa do zmiany https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:NazwyDlaczego wyciołeś nazwę firmy? Openstreetmaps to nie mapa historyczna. Jak już chcesz takie dodawać to rób to poprawnie a nie kasuj rzeczywistych danych. |
| 2 | 2025-05-21 23:37 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofanehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166589485 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-21 23:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | 1) nie kasuj informacji co jest tam teraz2) opis wieku budynku nie jest jego nazwą3) to że coś jest zabytkiem zaznaczamy inaczej (patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:heritage - jak coś jest niejasne to daj znać, możesz poprosić o pomoc na oficjalnym forum na https://commu... | |
| 165058628 by Mechtal @ 2025-04-17 08:04 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-21 23:42 | Mateusz Konieczny | kasowanie nazw opisowych, jak już to do description to może iść - patrz też https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:heritagehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166589547 |
| 165058774 by Mechtal @ 2025-04-17 08:08 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-21 23:40 | Mateusz Konieczny | teren po dawnym cmentarzu to nie cmentarz i nie powinien być mapowany jako cmentarzhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166589509 |
| 165058697 by Mechtal @ 2025-04-17 08:06 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-21 23:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | nie dodawaj fikcyjnych nazw opisowych https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361618769/historyzabytki mapujemy, ale nie takzobacz sobie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:heritagejak potzrebujesz pomocy to daj znać |
| 2 | 2025-05-21 23:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | wycofanehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166589503 | |
| 158299640 by EnricoMittwoch @ 2024-10-24 14:24 | 1 | 2025-05-04 07:31 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello!You usedcolour=weißon https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12285529422/historyHave you maybe meantcolour=white?I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).Or have you used... |
| 2 | 2025-05-21 16:39 | EnricoMittwoch ♦2 | Hey, thank you for pointing out the issue with the color. I set the value in a free text form via every door. In german. My bad, "white" is correct, I fixed the data. I'll learn from this in favor of future edits. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-21 17:56 | Mateusz Konieczny | Thanks for the fix! | |
| 164647327 by Map_Rivers @ 2025-04-07 18:15 | 1 | 2025-05-21 11:47 | Mateusz Konieczny | Skąd ta nazy które tu dodano w tej edycji? Z jakiego źródła się biorą? |
| 161485484 by jornfranke @ 2025-01-18 10:29 | 1 | 2025-05-21 08:38 | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4766606 ?You added disused:amenity=pharmacy without removing healthcare=pharmacywhat you wanted to achieve? |
| 126034827 by ke9tv @ 2022-09-11 03:15 | 1 | 2025-05-20 03:10 | RDreher ♦10 | Why the crap should place= reflect size? That's not how things work in New York and you know it. If you want to know the size you can just look at the population. |
| 2 | 2025-05-20 14:56 | Allison P ♦1,136 | This is how it works on OSM. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-20 16:04 | RDreher ♦10 | Well it's not how it should work. This is stupid and I hate it, and I have brooding all the damn night about how wrong it is.Using the types of place= this way is like calling something an apartment instead of a detached house just because it is large. The category we put buildings in is no... | |
| 4 | 2025-05-20 16:19 | Allison P ♦1,136 | OSM doesn't use legal classifications because they are different in every state. Treating them the same is comparing apples to oranges. The population/amenity based definition means that a place=city in Saskatchewan means roughly the same thing as in Louisiana. I'm sorry you don't lik... | |
| 5 | 2025-05-20 16:26 | RDreher ♦10 | I'm sorry you have no ability to understand how morally wrong this is. | |
| 6 | 2025-05-20 16:38 | RDreher ♦10 | Why is the point of the map to you to compare apples to apples? In the field of anthropology, such way of thinking has been greatly rejected as being imperialistic. They used to categorize people into "tribes" as opposed to "kingdoms" or "states," so that we could compa... | |
| 7 | 2025-05-20 17:26 | bhousel ♦278 | Bro, chill. The whole point of assigning place tags relative to population centers is to help software decide how big to make the labels on the map.Nobody here is trying to oppress the cultures of Colonie, Ballston Spa, or Latham. | |
| 8 | 2025-05-20 17:46 | RDreher ♦10 | Don't tell me to chill. You have no right to tell me what to care about or what not to care about. Just because something doesn't matter to you, doesn't mean it shouldn't matter to others.I've already learned from elsewhere that most software ignores these damn stupid an... | |
| 9 | 2025-05-20 18:32 | Mateusz Konieczny | > You can't make these calls in any meaningful way without understanding the local customs, laws, and terminology.local customs, laws, and terminology can be tagged somehow, but place=* is not about local laws/customs/terminologyif village of 25 people is called "city" due ... | |
| 10 | 2025-05-20 18:45 | RDreher ♦10 | No you can't. The current OSM definitions for place= are absolutely meaningless and arbitrary, like calling a large house an apartment. In order to know if something is an apartment you have to know the local customs, the economic and legal rules that define that building's usage. The same... | |
| 11 | 2025-05-20 18:54 | ke9tv ♦82 | @Mateusz Konieczky We're ahead of you on that. In New York, at least, we tag the form of government - the "local law" that @RDreher is referring to - on the boundary relation as 'border_type'. (Unfortunately, 'admin_level' is problematic for this: New York's ... | |
| 12 | 2025-05-20 21:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | > foreigner walking into a Japanese shrine ground and calling it a mere gardenmapping garden of cultural and religious significance as a garden is fine and does not preclude mapping it also as place of worship or historic monument in the same way using standard place= tagging does not pre... | |
| 13 | 2025-05-21 01:32 | RDreher ♦10 | Your philosophy is wrong and this approach is ＠＠＠＠＠ wrong. I don't have to like it, but I am getting absolutely sick of trying to argue about it. If you don't want to see the light fine continue living in your goddam cave. I'm done with this. | |
| 166541059 by Rainero @ 2025-05-20 20:10 | 1 | 2025-05-20 21:53 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/24xM has some similar cases (shop= with opening_hours=closed) |
| 166477455 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2025-05-19 13:38 | 1 | 2025-05-20 06:35 | goedegazelle ♦239 | I reset this automated change for the third time.I have to emphasise that you are not allowed to start an edit war, as you already have done.I would also like to mention that you can ignore people in the forum but not on the map. |
| 2 | 2025-05-20 15:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | what is your reason for retagging it to sidewalk=none ?it means the same and it just makes harder to process datageneral migration was approved and in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sidewalk-none-to-no-proposed-automated-edit/128842/15 you claimed that both values mean the same and th... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-20 15:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | I guess I can implement opt-out - can you post list of ways which you want to retag to sidewalk=none in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sidewalk-none-to-no-proposed-automated-edit/128842/ thread?I guess that I can also exclude ways you last edited but in such case when someone else edits w... | |
| 66039636 by BowralMapper @ 2019-01-05 04:22 | 1 | 2025-05-19 18:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640284105/history has roof = crosspitched that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=crosspitched was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 154822736 by Shevshenko @ 2024-08-04 17:25 | 1 | 2025-05-19 18:56 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12092170017/history has fixme:type = bank that was added in this editWould amenity=bank fit here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=bank |
| 149681864 by NaanAvanIllai @ 2024-04-07 08:25 | 1 | 2025-05-19 17:50 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11799300846/history has fixme:type = park that was added in this editHave you tried to map a park here? If yes, then maybe leisure=park would fit?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark |
| 122877068 by Sovushka @ 2022-06-26 18:11 | 1 | 2025-05-11 20:25 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9848568712 - is it an unmarked pedestrian crossing?(I tried to fix it based on aerial but I see no crossing there) |
| 2 | 2025-05-18 12:29 | Sovushka ♦9 | I was here so long ago that I don't remember. I don't plan to be there anytime soon. Almost 3 years have passed, so what is actually there right now is a mystery to me. Do what you feel is right. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-18 12:31 | Sovushka ♦9 | And thank you for commenting, that warmed my heart. I'm curious what did you do to get to that node? This edit is almost 3 years old, how did you find it? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-19 14:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | For start, thanks for mapping and have a good mappy happy day!For this location: I opened note then, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4766857And how I found it? I am trying to fix amenity=fixme broken tagging, see https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880 | |
| 5 | 2025-05-20 10:51 | Sovushka ♦9 | Thank you! | |
| 164039662 by Flaon @ 2025-03-24 15:50 | 1 | 2025-05-19 13:42 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3093602337/history#map=19/50.806662/19.117776ta apteka to nie istnieje? Pytam się bo healthcare=pharmacy zostało |
| 166476824 by HellMap @ 2025-05-19 13:25 | 1 | 2025-05-19 13:32 | Mateusz Konieczny | re https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4766604yes, ED has a known bug about pharmacies, I reported it at https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/905and thanks for checking here! |
| 166213007 by AnnaCatarina @ 2025-05-13 16:48 | 1 | 2025-05-14 12:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278391679/history has building = proposed that was added in this editIs this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building... |
| 2 | 2025-05-18 12:58 | AnnaCatarina ♦25 | Hello Mateusz, You are writing exactly about, what I was asking a source for. I did not map those buildings originally and because it was tagged as an exisitng building with "Planned ... building" as the name, I was just changing the tagging into building=proposed and asked for a source of... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-19 10:40 | Mateusz Konieczny | I asked in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150689265If they do not reply I plan to revert them | |
| 150689265 by tkmedia @ 2024-04-30 05:30 | 1 | 2025-05-19 10:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geo... |
| 139624807 by Neuwessi11 @ 2023-08-08 17:33 | 1 | 2025-05-08 18:20 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25340456/history has surface:note = Holzstufen that was added in this editsurface:note=Holzstufen ? Maybe surface=wood on highway=steps would be better?Or highway=steps + material=wood + surface=dirt (or gravel or something else) if steps are built from... |
| 2 | 2025-05-08 19:32 | Neuwessi11 ♦46 | I didn't know having made such a key ... :)I guess I was looking for something describing what's there, but was not suggested by StreetComplete. By the way, I often meet steps StreetComplete is asking for the surface. But SC doesn't suggest stone steps.But anyway, your last sugg... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-18 13:15 | Neuwessi11 ♦46 | I fixed it now like you suggested, because I think it's describing best the actual situation. Let's see if someone will be complaining about the somewhat weired combination of surface and material ... :) | |
| 4 | 2025-05-19 10:12 | Mateusz Konieczny | Thanks!It is listed on wiki for some time, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=steps (note: I added it after https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dsteps/Archive_1#trail_steps ) | |
| 166440052 by mocnysiuwaks @ 2025-05-18 16:49 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-18 20:52 | Mateusz Konieczny | takie zmiany kategorii dużych dróg trzeba najpierw na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 zaproponowaća po drugie, jeśli otwarcie obwodnicy coś zmienia to trzeba na to otwarcie poczekać |
| 163591714 by Le_Sharkoïste @ 2025-03-13 22:58 | 1 | 2025-05-17 23:35 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1055465940/history has shop = oil that was added in this editshop=oil ? Is it a shop selling edible oil? Engine oil? Fuel oil? Something else?Is this shop even existing? |
| 2 | 2025-05-18 22:20 | Le_Sharkoïste ♦60 | It was already there before the import IIRC | |
| 3 | 2025-05-18 22:21 | Le_Sharkoïste ♦60 | as for whether it still exists, I don't know | |
| 154172656 by ray331 @ 2024-07-20 10:15 | 1 | 2025-05-17 23:12 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12064514316/history has fixme:type = store that was added in this editWhat kind of shop is here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting? |
| 136318825 by EBSerKartler @ 2023-05-19 22:46 | 1 | 2025-05-17 23:00 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196975888/history has roof_shape = mansard that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=mansard was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 2 | 2025-06-09 16:37 | EBSerKartler ♦13 | Hello Mateusz,thank you for your feedback! I have just fixed this issue. | |
| 158341869 by WEXO @ 2024-10-25 14:56 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12288277501/history has shop = oil that was added in this editshop=oil ? Is it a shop selling edible oil? Engine oil? Fuel oil? Something else?Is this shop even existing? |
| 158988821 by aceman444 @ 2024-11-10 23:28 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11690549046/history has shop = oil that was added in this editshop=oil ? Is it a shop selling edible oil? Engine oil? Fuel oil? Something else?Is this shop even existing? |
| 133306143 by MapMapper_ @ 2023-03-04 21:00 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:31 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10710867955/history has shop = oil that was added in this editshop=oil ? Is it a shop selling edible oil? Engine oil? Fuel oil? Something else?Is this shop even existing?website is linked but it is not opening for me (an eternal blue spinner, no co... |
| 2 | 2025-05-18 01:00 | MapMapper_ ♦9 | Hi! The Tanger map website loads for me using Brave browser; perhaps consider using a different browser or incognito mode.I added these businesses based on a survey of the Tanger Outlets Palm Beach location map (linked in the businesses' website tags). The website does not always specify wh... | |
| 160607206 by Piagno @ 2024-12-25 15:06 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443863477/history has roof:type = sawtooth that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=sawtooth was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 2 | 2025-05-18 06:14 | Piagno ♦92 | true, thanks, fixed it.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166416716 | |
| 60695119 by jarlemag @ 2018-07-13 17:43 | 1 | 2025-05-17 22:00 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513731870/history has roof = pyramidal that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=pyramidal was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 159057053 by Tino T @ 2024-11-12 16:10 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9763444388/history has amenity = water that was added in this editamenity=water? What is this?If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typicallyused.man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.man_made=water_tap w... |
| 2 | 2025-05-17 07:53 | Tino T ♦1 | Hi, as I wrote in the change note: it is a reservoir (not a tap) with rainwater, so it is not drinking water. We can change the field if you like, but it is neither man_made, nor is there a water_tap, nor is it drinking water. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-17 08:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | would https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank fit? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-17 08:53 | Tino T ♦1 | Yes, that would fit. | |
| 139063889 by Joseph R P @ 2023-07-27 02:17 | 1 | 2025-05-16 22:04 | Mateusz Konieczny | why you added construction=secondary to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19880251/history ?can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4762879 ? |
| 2 | 2025-05-21 23:26 | Joseph R P ♦340 | I don't remember exactly since the edit was made a couple years back, but I would have to guess that it is just a relic from the tags of another way that was carried over erroneously, likely if I had copied and pasted the tags of another way. I've fixed it just now. | |
| 159720652 by imagoiq @ 2024-11-28 21:49 | 1 | 2025-04-16 07:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12383321070/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this editWhat kind of shop is here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting? |
| 2 | 2025-04-16 15:39 | imagoiq ♦25 | Hi Mateusz,I couldn't decide on a value while being in the street and I still cannot choose one. Maybe art or gift ? They do not seem to be a charity and they are selling various products from Equator: jewellery, craft, clothes and food.What do you think ? Gift is probabéy the be... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-16 21:40 | Mateusz Konieczny | sounds like gift, and it is used thereI guess that means that fixme:type = shop tag can be removed? | |
| 145724813 by Milhouse @ 2023-12-31 09:41 | 1 | 2025-04-17 13:53 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11472549848/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-04-17 15:53 | Milhouse ♦26 | I don't remember! It was probably closed at the time I went past, or had sufficiently varied stock I couldn't decide. I can't even find it in a web search. I think "fixme" is what Everydoor adds when you choose something that isn't a recognised tag. Even without a sho... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-16 15:29 | Mateusz Konieczny | > I think "fixme" is what Everydoor adds when you choose something that isn't a recognised tag. Yes, see https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880> Even without a shop type, it adds value for someone searching for the shop via Nominatim, no?https://www.openstre... | |
| 146538897 by AndySchulte @ 2024-01-22 06:54 | 1 | 2025-05-14 12:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11503139201/history has building = proposed that was added in this editIs this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then buildi... |
| 2 | 2025-05-16 07:55 | AndySchulte ♦97 | Hi Mateusz,thanks for your message!I've just reworked the entire residential development area using the latest aerial imagery.The tag building=proposed has been removed accordingly.My original changeset is about 1.5 years old – honestly, I can’t say for sure what the exa... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-16 15:15 | Mateusz Konieczny | thanks for upadte! | |
| 4 | 2025-05-16 15:15 | Mateusz Konieczny | update, obviously | |
| 140944399 by canfe @ 2023-09-07 14:34 | 1 | 2025-05-06 17:30 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11174739069/history - do you plan to map that bridge? |
| 2 | 2025-05-16 14:57 | canfe ♦1,117 | I remember that I had cancelled the bridge because the path was also now disused and bridge unsafe.Maybe now they have restored it?However, I don't think I will be passing through there again anytime soon. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-16 15:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4762407 | |
| 4 | 2025-05-24 16:37 | canfe ♦1,117 | I don't plan to go through that area anytime soon.If anyone can stop by and check on the bridge restoration, please add them. | |
| 150428759 by AurélienQ @ 2024-04-24 07:30 | 1 | 2025-05-06 17:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11843195662/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-05-06 18:40 | AurélienQ ♦117 | Hi, thanks for your message. I forgot this POI. I correct it and it's ok now. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-16 14:28 | Mateusz Konieczny | thanks for a fix! | |
| 166021088 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2025-05-09 10:23 | 1 | 2025-05-12 14:33 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,392 | Hallo,ein paar Änderungen dieses Changesets machen doch nicht wirklich Sinn. Weswegen wird bei einem Feldweg, ein sidewalk=none zu einem sidewalk=no? Ist dies nicht ein komplett überflüssiger bot-Edit? Meines Erachtens nach macht eine automatisierte Änderung nur bei bes... |
| 2 | 2025-05-13 13:25 | Mateusz Konieczny | benefit from removing this tag in cases where it is pointless is small enough that editing each case by human is not really worth itbetter to spend human time on more useful things | |
| 3 | 2025-05-13 13:27 | Mateusz Konieczny | also, this edit IS limited to cetain highway valuesif someone created leisure=playground sidewalk=none where it is simply wrong this edit will not affect it | |
| 4 | 2025-05-16 06:55 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,392 | Several map changes appear unnecessary. As previously noted, altering a sidewalk=* value on a highway track is inappropriate, given that such tracks with a surface=grass typically do not accommodate sidewalks in this region. It would be beneficial to restrict such changes in your bot's activiti... | |
| 5 | 2025-05-16 14:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | > altering a sidewalk=* value on a highway track is inappropriate, given that such tracks with a surface=grass typically do not accommodate sidewalks in this regionwhy inappropriate? this bot is NOT adding new values, it is only moving already tagged sidewalk=none to sidewalk=noalso, appa... | |
| 166191196 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-05-13 09:09 | 1 | 2025-05-16 08:57 | aceman444 ♦2,567 | Thanks, you are right. But the wiki links are useful, maybe they would be better in 'brand', or 'network' tags? |
| 2 | 2025-05-16 14:20 | Mateusz Konieczny | maybe? does not fit ideally but sort of fitsmaybe link to wikipedia can be also added in url key? | |
| 164909728 by Danrejk @ 2025-04-13 19:24 | 1 | 2025-04-22 12:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1377285747/historyskąd informacja że tam tunel wysypany piaskiem? |
| 2 | 2025-04-22 13:14 | Mateusz Konieczny | I skąd ta nazwa "Backrooms Forum"? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-16 14:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | wysłałem PW | |
| 4 | 2025-05-16 14:18 | Mateusz Konieczny | o widzę coś w https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4722448 | |
| 5 | 2025-05-16 15:13 | Danrejk ♦2 | Tunel jest wysypany piaskiem. Byłem tam. Lokalna i nieoficjalna nazwa Backrooms Forum jest używana przez wiele niepodległych grup młodzieży. Nie jest to inside joke jeżeli to jest o co pytasz | |
| 153860555 by MatchaHatesGoogle @ 2024-07-12 15:18 | 1 | 2025-03-31 15:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12049571046/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? |
| 2 | 2025-04-05 12:23 | MatchaHatesGoogle ♦17 | It was a shop that sells just yarn iirc. I think it was literally just called Yarn Shop. Must've chosen a fixme everydoor option. Don't live so close to here though, was on a road trip. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 22:49 | Mateusz Konieczny | shop=yarn for nowdefinitely better than amenity=fixme | |
| 4 | 2025-05-15 22:49 | Mateusz Konieczny | (but if you see better tagging - please use it!) | |
| 158950092 by Hyperling @ 2024-11-09 21:49 | 1 | 2025-04-17 08:19 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12327554720/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-04-17 11:04 | Hyperling ♦2 | Hiya! It's an RV and camper store and service center which also sells accessories that can be used for van life. I couldn't find a simple "retail store" option and none of the specific store options seemed to fit it. Probably because I was using the word "store" instead... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 22:27 | Mateusz Konieczny | shop=caravan seems to be a perfect match! | |
| 4 | 2025-05-16 13:48 | Hyperling ♦2 | Excellent, thanks!! I got it changed a few days ago when making some other changes. :) | |
| 134626125 by richlv @ 2023-04-07 17:19 | 1 | 2025-04-16 07:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10793499416/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this editWhat kind of shop is here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting? |
| 2 | 2025-04-18 09:22 | richlv ♦384 | Not quite sure - according to https://moop.lv/ , it's chemist, wine, food...Might need an in-person survey to do better than guessing. If not, I'd hit with chemist, but that absolutely leaves out other aspects that slightly hint at deli, but not really. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 22:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4761261 | |
| 128809472 by Jolesh @ 2022-11-12 11:47 | 1 | 2025-04-11 08:07 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10178015776/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)What kind of shop is here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting? |
| 2 | 2025-04-11 12:45 | Jolesh ♦24 | Hej.Sorry, I don't remember what kind of shop it was. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 22:09 | Mateusz Konieczny | I will create a note there.One more victim of https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880 I guess | |
| 152850690 by LuisAlfredo92 @ 2024-06-18 14:04 | 1 | 2025-04-17 08:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11990197688/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-04-17 16:33 | LuisAlfredo92 ♦1 | Hello, it's a shop where they sell donuts and frappes mainlyIt looks like it's shop:food, but I was looking for something more specific since they're desserts | |
| 3 | 2025-04-17 17:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food + one of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine ? | |
| 4 | 2025-04-17 17:14 | Mateusz Konieczny | (if they sell things that you eat immediately)or maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dpastry ? | |
| 5 | 2025-04-17 20:50 | LuisAlfredo92 ♦1 | I think it'd be shop=pastry, because although they aren't in exhibition, you ask for the donuts and drinks and you can eat them immediately (and you should or they will melt) | |
| 6 | 2025-05-15 22:07 | Mateusz Konieczny | changed it then! | |
| 139055097 by Sonja Emilie @ 2023-07-26 19:55 | 1 | 2025-04-28 17:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11069965655/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-05-05 15:27 | Sonja Emilie ♦4 | I don't remember, and the web address doesn't seem to work (anymore?). Maybe it's best to create a note? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 22:06 | Mateusz Konieczny | Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4761248Thanks for a reply! | |
| 4 | 2025-05-16 08:36 | Sonja Emilie ♦4 | Thanks! | |
| 164777083 by Zol87 @ 2025-04-10 16:13 | 1 | 2025-05-05 05:55 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12745007864/historyis it really a place where you can cut your hair?if you can buy hair-related products there but not cut hair then maybe shop=hairdresser_supply would be better? |
| 2 | 2025-05-05 18:05 | Zol87 ♦42 | I just went with the standard brand tags for that brand. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 22:04 | Mateusz Konieczny | Yes, but is a place where you can cut your hair?(some other OSM-related brand index claims that appropriate tags are different and I am trying to figure whether they are wrong or not) | |
| 163208234 by anirudh-ramesh @ 2025-03-04 16:06 | 1 | 2025-04-18 14:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12636170261/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this editWhat kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop ) |
| 2 | 2025-04-21 04:17 | anirudh-ramesh ♦1 | It's a manhole having some communication equipment like optical fibre cables. It's probably operated by Tata Communications Limited (TCL). | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 22:02 | Mateusz Konieczny | So man_made=manhole ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmanhole ) ?+ manhole=telecom ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:manhole ) ? | |
| 165837982 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2025-05-05 10:23 | 1 | 2025-05-05 10:53 | pavvv ♦474 | Przy okazji może nie zauważyłeś, ale na wątku było pytanie do Ciebie. Może będzie się dało zatwierdzić ten znacznik. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/i-have-been-accused-of-vandalism/128483/15 |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 21:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | zmieniłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101126652 na aeroway=cargo_terminalnie planuje przepychać tego przez pełen proces, ale może zrobię stronę na wiki | |
| 27623958 by sir-mapalot @ 2014-12-22 07:07 | 1 | 2025-04-19 06:32 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3247349372/history has fixme = yes that was added in this editWhat requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then? |
| 2 | 2025-04-19 17:05 | sir-mapalot ♦12 | The housenumber. Given the 999 before the crossing, 1001 probably doesn't exist as they seem based on distance, but 1001 is a safe placeholder for search to work. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 18:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | moved that info into fixme tag | |
| 139251126 by voltairovicz @ 2023-07-31 12:02 | 1 | 2025-05-15 17:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218655853/history has roof = hipped that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 132292371 by Christian Nilsson @ 2023-02-09 07:59 | 1 | 2025-05-15 17:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111746841/history has roof = hipped that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 114075202 by EBSerKartler @ 2021-11-21 22:19 | 1 | 2025-05-15 17:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859746855/history has roof = hipped that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 2 | 2025-06-09 16:32 | EBSerKartler ♦13 | Hello Mateusz,thank you for your feedback! I have just fixed this issue. | |
| 115856846 by geo-d @ 2022-01-06 23:11 | 1 | 2025-05-15 17:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118211760/history has roof = hipped that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 164654434 by hikui87 @ 2025-04-07 22:01 | 1 | 2025-05-14 12:22 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12737621217/history has building = proposed that was added in this editIs this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then buildi... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 15:20 | hikui87 ♦1 | Hello! This is a new subdivision in my local area. The preliminary work has been completed, and the plat has been recorded by the County. The lots are currently for sale, with several already under contract. To my knowledge, no actual construction has started yet, which is why I used the proposed ta... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 17:38 | Mateusz Konieczny | I guess that makes sense here, especially with nodes | |
| 119164151 by okwithmydecay @ 2022-03-31 14:40 | 1 | 2025-05-15 17:28 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046871528/history has roof = hipped that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 16:29 | okwithmydecay ♦33 | Thanks for the heads-up, I have corrected https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167019942 | |
| 136192609 by marek kleciak @ 2023-05-17 04:13 | 1 | 2025-05-15 17:25 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173209389/history has roof:type = hipped that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 113876396 by BudgieInWA @ 2021-11-17 01:57 | 1 | 2025-05-15 16:48 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002855891/history has roof:type = flat that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=flat was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 155581115 by riesgo23 @ 2024-08-21 22:42 | 1 | 2025-05-15 16:48 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243334554/history has roof:type = flat that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=flat was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 127572815 by ticki_52 @ 2022-10-15 14:07 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3303091868/history has shop = machinery that was added in this editshop=machinery ? What kind of machines? Industrial machines? Washing machines? Computers? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - though maybe new one is nee... |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 14:51 | ticki_52 ♦113 | Hi Mateusz, please see CS #166309011 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 16:45 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166309011 | |
| 4 | 2025-05-15 16:45 | Mateusz Konieczny | thanks for a fix! | |
| 43900025 by Montiney85 @ 2016-11-23 16:27 | 1 | 2025-05-15 16:27 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447240017/history has roof:type = flat that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=flat was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 89161724 by MichaelCollinson @ 2020-08-09 18:37 | 1 | 2025-05-15 14:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125913193/history has roof_shape = hipped that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 15:25 | MichaelCollinson ♦53 | Yep! Fixed now. Thanks Mateusz | |
| 126407314 by EBSerKartler @ 2022-09-20 06:37 | 1 | 2025-05-15 14:57 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043744750/history has roof_shape = hipped that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 2 | 2025-06-09 16:25 | EBSerKartler ♦13 | Hello Mateusz,thank you for the feedback. I have just fixed this issue. | |
| 165240967 by Valario127 @ 2025-04-21 13:46 | 1 | 2025-05-11 20:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12772203405/history has shop = oil that was added in this editshop=oil ? Is it a shop selling edible oil? Engine oil? Fuel oil? Something else?Is this shop even existing? |
| 2 | 2025-05-12 13:57 | Valario127 ♦1 | Hello! The site I marked is a food oil store. The store is called "Museo del aceite" ("Oil Museum") and is still operating. I don't know the correct label for that type of store. If you could correct it for me, I'd really appreciate it. I'm so sorry for the confusi... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 13:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | shop=food_oil is not widely used, but least communicates what it is!I think it is good enough for now | |
| 58092121 by daModdin @ 2018-04-14 15:45 | 1 | 2025-05-15 13:29 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306264577/history has roof = skillion that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=skillion was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 166300139 by ravi8 @ 2025-05-15 11:44 | 1 | 2025-05-15 13:22 | Mateusz Konieczny | jeśli istnieje to nie usuwamynawigacja jakdojade.pl może sprawdzić np tag incline w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082083093/history |
| 153161587 by CTWillard @ 2024-06-25 14:58 | 1 | 2025-05-11 21:10 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509300657/history has shop = smoke_shop that was added in this editIs it the same as shop=headshop - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dheadshop ? Or the same as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsmartshop ?Or maybe it sells... |
| 2 | 2025-05-12 16:55 | CTWillard ♦1 | Currently, this building is empty and not in use. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-13 18:49 | Mateusz Konieczny | so this shop should be deleted, right? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-14 15:39 | CTWillard ♦1 | Yes | |
| 5 | 2025-05-15 13:16 | Mateusz Konieczny | deleting it then | |
| 110926031 by VictorIE @ 2021-09-08 15:04 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:17 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9074201437/history has shop = funeral that was added in this editshop=funeral ? Is it intentionally used instead of shop=funeral_directors ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfuneral_directors ). If it was deliberately used instead - how i... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 15:51 | VictorIE ♦907 | Definitely NOT funeral directors. https://www.facebook.com/p/The-Remembrance-Shop-100087220220355/I'm not sure what else it could be called. Shop=gift would seem ... unkind. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 13:14 | Mateusz Konieczny | shop=grave_accessories ? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-15 13:15 | Mateusz Konieczny | (but adding it here would double global usage to two times worldwide) | |
| 128908897 by Jakka @ 2022-11-14 20:43 | 1 | 2025-05-14 12:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10184258964/history has building = proposed that was added in this editIs this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then buildi... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 16:11 | Jakka ♦1,814 | On these subdivisions, addresses of future houses are very necessary so that suppliers of building materials know how to find them.Some have already been built and occupied | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 13:14 | Mateusz Konieczny | I guess that building=proposed is less problematic on nodes, though maybe lifecycle prefix like proposed:building=yes would make sense here | |
| 156708478 by Canalsman @ 2024-09-16 23:13 | 1 | 2025-05-14 13:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251169231/history has surface = tarmac that was added in this editis it an actual tarmacadan? In such case surface=tarmacadan may be a better less confused term (tarmac is widely used for asphalt and concrete surfaces)Or is it just a regular asphalt sur... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 22:30 | Canalsman ♦4 | Tarmacadam was invented in the UK but has since been abbreviated to tarmac. It is used in the UK to describe all road surfaces with a bituminous component. Asphalt I believe is an American term so is inappropriate in this country. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 13:12 | Mateusz Konieczny | one way or another OSM rather uses https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dasphalt | |
| 4 | 2025-05-15 23:05 | Canalsman ♦4 | To quote from the link you gave:This surface is known as "asphalt, blacktop, or pavement in North America, and tarmac or bitumen macadam in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland"That's exactly what I said... | |
| 155292729 by andershl @ 2024-08-15 16:54 | 1 | 2025-05-15 13:03 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910884136/history has roof_shape = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 160753690 by Waldamsel @ 2024-12-29 14:49 | 1 | 2025-05-15 12:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129526470/history has roof_shape = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 142855081 by EBSerKartler @ 2023-10-20 07:39 | 1 | 2025-05-15 12:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44021295/history has roof_shape = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 2 | 2025-06-09 16:05 | EBSerKartler ♦13 | Hello Mateusz,of course you are right. I have just fixed this tag (not only for this building) | |
| 143415881 by karaga @ 2023-10-31 11:31 | 1 | 2025-05-15 12:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1219489899/history has roof_shape = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 111683746 by just_another_mapper @ 2021-09-25 11:13 | 1 | 2025-05-15 12:28 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840814045/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 113499231 by k_au @ 2021-11-07 23:11 | 1 | 2025-05-15 12:28 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/271407831/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 122241563 by SK53 @ 2022-06-11 09:35 | 1 | 2025-05-15 12:28 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068742206/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 113544525 by Shrinks99 @ 2021-11-09 01:12 | 1 | 2025-05-15 12:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43804435/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 19:55 | Shrinks99 ♦13 | Oof a mistake! I have fixed this. Thanks for checking my work! | |
| 134707714 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2023-04-10 00:59 | 1 | 2025-05-15 11:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160960997/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 158783902 by muzirian @ 2024-11-05 15:30 | 1 | 2025-05-14 19:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12314537119/history has shop = diary that was added in this editshop=diary ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it really shop=diary selling diaries? Or is it typoed shop=dairy ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Ddairy )? |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 11:16 | muzirian ♦140 | it was typo, thnx | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 11:19 | Mateusz Konieczny | I will change also name then | |
| 144323401 by mcliquid @ 2023-11-22 12:01 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/906716007/history has shop = machinery that was added in this editshop=machinery ? What kind of machines? Industrial machines? Washing machines? Computers? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - though maybe new one is need... |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 06:50 | mcliquid ♦1,852 | Translated here are "sheet metal working machines" offered. What's your suggestion? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 11:10 | Mateusz Konieczny | shop=industrial_machinery ?or maybe office=company company=industrial_machinery (if you cannot walk in to order something but it is rather their internal office) | |
| 154994156 by Hayleox @ 2024-08-08 19:13 | 1 | 2025-05-15 10:12 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50723524/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 2 | 2025-05-27 23:48 | Hayleox ♦9 | Ah good find. I fixed it now; thanks! | |
| 119404055 by penguineer @ 2022-04-06 21:25 | 1 | 2025-05-15 10:12 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/209945623/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 117147700 by CraigPrusansky @ 2022-02-08 07:45 | 1 | 2025-05-15 09:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025990774/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 127367990 by Evan Carroll @ 2022-10-11 15:49 | 1 | 2025-05-15 09:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102919907/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 108692619 by Manxray @ 2021-07-27 13:36 | 1 | 2025-05-15 09:29 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/868755456/history has roof = hipped that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 57072866 by kr4z33 @ 2018-03-11 04:35 | 1 | 2025-05-15 09:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568607352/history has roof = hippedMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 131943220 by Johnny Carlsen @ 2023-02-01 01:18 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:11 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10597749322/history has amenity = water that was added in this editamenity=water? What is this?If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typicallyused.man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.man_made=water_tap ... |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 03:11 | Johnny Carlsen ♦94 | Hi Mateusz,I also did not know what amenity=water meant. I have tagged man_made=water_tower, amenity=drinking_water, emergency=fire_hydrants, and natural=water in the past.So I went back to check what was there, and it is indeed amenity=drinking_water. I have updated the tag now.Thank yo... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 08:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | and thanks for mapping it! | |
| 122667302 by LBond93 @ 2022-06-21 12:43 | 1 | 2024-11-10 11:41 | Mateusz Konieczny | why you added junction=roundabout here? |
| 2 | 2024-11-12 07:56 | LBond93 ♦2 | Hello! I added junction=roundabout according to road sign "Roundabout" on Mapillary (link) and OSM Wiki (link) - in section "Examples" described appropriate Signposts. Let me know if you have any other information on how this object should be mapped. | |
| 3 | 2024-11-12 07:57 | LBond93 ♦2 | Hello! I added junction=roundabout according to road sign "Roundabout" on Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=859729839132846&focus=photo&lat=50.086900999972&lng=19.8916313&z=17&x=0.6397329514031476&y=0.6467842721139305&zoom=1.9612090177029309) and OS... | |
| 4 | 2025-05-14 22:59 | Mateusz Konieczny | Sorry for my mistake then! | |
| 156536084 by Kasbah Hostel @ 2024-09-12 16:04 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:27 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4728602652/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgue... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 16:54 | Kasbah Hostel ♦1 | This should be tourism=hostel, I don't think guest_house= is applicable. I will remove it. Thank you! | |
| 3 | 2025-05-14 21:46 | Mateusz Konieczny | thanks for a fix! | |
| 157433379 by Fraxi @ 2024-10-03 19:12 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:24 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12219283214/history has shop = machinery that was added in this editshop=machinery ? What kind of machines? Industrial machines? Washing machines? Computers? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - though maybe new one is ne... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 20:06 | Fraxi ♦128 | Hello! I decided to change the value of the shop to "=cleaning_supplies", though they offer also vacuum cleaners(see the product list on https://kamakbg.com/index.en.html). | |
| 3 | 2025-05-14 21:33 | Mateusz Konieczny | thanks! I guess that vacuum cleaners are also kind of cleaning supplies | |
| 164398454 by amunak @ 2025-04-02 01:35 | 1 | 2025-05-14 20:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446633428/history has roof_shape = flat that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 2 | 2025-06-05 14:20 | amunak ♦2 | Yes! Of course. Thanks, fixed. | |
| 48999230 by Noah Peeters @ 2017-05-26 11:25 | 1 | 2025-05-14 20:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140097076/history has roof_shape = flat that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 21:51 | Noah Peeters ♦2 | Yes, probably. Then there are probable other changes in that area with the same mistake. If I remember correctly, I made multiple changes in that area. But I don’t have time in the next few days to check that in detail. | |
| 65084020 by Hendrikklaas @ 2018-12-01 22:37 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-14 20:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285922304/history has roof_shape = flat that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 122850469 by Mister Kanister @ 2022-06-25 21:19 | 1 | 2025-05-14 20:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49478419/history has roof_shape = flat that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape |
| 127479943 by sheldonelectric @ 2022-10-13 16:38 | 1 | 2025-05-14 19:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10098122129/history has shop = cbd that was added in this editshop=cbd ? What kind of shop, if any is here? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=cannabis - is shop=cannabis intentionally not used here? |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 19:28 | sheldonelectric ♦178 | Hey there! I'm not sure what had happened, maybe there was no "cannabis" tag on osmand~ back then, or I didn't know there was one. I corrected it now. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-14 19:40 | Mateusz Konieczny | Thanks for fix! If you encounter it with new version of Osmand it may be worth reporting to its authors :) | |
| 151614073 by Ipintza @ 2024-05-21 07:37 | 1 | 2025-05-14 19:25 | Mateusz Konieczny | can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4758819 ? |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 19:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4758820 and likely also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4758821 | |
| 129973922 by Max-Kritic @ 2022-12-11 19:56 | 1 | 2025-05-14 19:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10253749478/history has shop = cbd that was added in this editshop=cbd ? What kind of shop, if any is here? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=cannabis - is shop=cannabis intentionally not used here? |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 08:56 | Max-Kritic ♦224 | Corrigé | |
| 165666881 by redfox_ @ 2025-05-01 09:39 | 1 | 2025-05-14 19:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7389914151/history has shop = cbd that was added in this editshop=cbd ? What kind of shop, if any is here? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=cannabis - is shop=cannabis intentionally not used here? |
| 119019269 by sorau @ 2022-03-28 12:13 | 1 | 2025-05-14 19:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9613035767/history has shop = cbd that was added in this editshop=cbd ? What kind of shop, if any is here? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=cannabis - is shop=cannabis intentionally not used here? |
| 156502425 by LeJeromix @ 2024-09-11 20:37 | 1 | 2025-05-14 19:23 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12170668963/history has shop = cbd that was added in this editshop=cbd ? What kind of shop, if any is here? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=cannabis - is shop=cannabis intentionally not used here? |
| 2 | 2025-05-16 18:41 | LeJeromix ♦3 | I am not the shop owner.The web site connected to this shop https://highsociety.fr/#crest show some CBD products that are legal product.Personally I wouldn't assume to change it for cannabis at least for legal reason but I may be wrong. | |
| 134308006 by okadatsuneo @ 2023-03-30 14:39 | 1 | 2025-05-14 19:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10773514645/history has shop = accessory that was added in this editshop=accessory ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.open... |
| 2 | 2025-05-18 13:00 | okadatsuneo ♦72 | Hello,Since this shop closed this year, I changed the tag to shop=vacant. | |
| 20442602 by Kilkenni @ 2014-02-08 08:17 | 1 | 2025-05-14 19:21 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2660988047/history has shop = electrotools that was added in this editshop=electrotools ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is shop=electrotools used intentionally instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=power_tools ? If yes, what is the d... |
| 114310981 by winne007 @ 2021-11-28 01:19 | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:50 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9289218561/history has shop = factory that was added in this editshop=factory? is it providing some service or selling products to general public ? Or is it man_made=works? Or is it company office (office=company)?If it is shop, which of https://wiki.o... |
| 152098638 by Chieftl @ 2024-05-31 20:58 | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:49 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11948621352/history has shop = organic that was added in this editshop=organic ? What kind of products are sold there?shop tag should contain shop type value - and organic is not oneYou can have organic shop of various typesshop=greengrocersh... |
| 148670306 by Trip Maker @ 2024-03-15 05:06 | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:49 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11733160018/history has shop = organic that was added in this editshop=organic ? What kind of products are sold there?shop tag should contain shop type value - and organic is not oneYou can have organic shop of various typesshop=greengrocersh... |
| 120733940 by votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale @ 2022-05-09 07:54 | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:49 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9726192917/history has shop = organic that was added in this editshop=organic ? What kind of products are sold there?shop tag should contain shop type value - and organic is not oneYou can have organic shop of various typesshop=greengrocersho... |
| 120958662 by andrewpmk @ 2022-05-14 00:23 | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:49 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9738644996/history has shop = organic that was added in this editshop=organic ? What kind of products are sold there?shop tag should contain shop type value - and organic is not oneYou can have organic shop of various typesshop=greengrocersho... |
| 146424737 by MultiSource @ 2024-01-19 00:30 | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:48 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11529343496/history has shop = organic that was added in this editshop=organic ? What kind of products are sold there?shop tag should contain shop type value - and organic is not oneYou can have organic shop of various typesshop=greengrocersh... |
| 2 | 2025-05-16 03:14 | MultiSource ♦1 | Thank you for your feedback, I'm review this now. | |
| 139329586 by andreiachim @ 2023-08-02 06:31 | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:46 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11082636612/history has shop = natural that was added in this editshop=natural ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstre... |
| 90120905 by Hannes Röst @ 2020-08-29 14:05 | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7856637974/history has shop = spiritual that was added in this editshop=spiritual ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=esoteric or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop... |
| 123010072 by OSM KAMI @ 2022-06-29 16:09 | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:39 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9856097742/history has shop = gate that was added in this editshop=gate ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 18:56 | KAMI ♦5 | Hi,As far as remember that was a shop to sell gates.Not it seems a shop to sell car care stuffs.I found them here:https://www.carzoneshop.hu/uzletek | |
| 3 | 2025-05-14 18:56 | KAMI ♦5 | Not->Now | |
| 145884043 by ImprovingStepByStep @ 2024-01-04 14:34 | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:37 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11486818341/history has shop = poulterer that was added in this editshop=poulterer ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.open... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 18:38 | Mateusz Konieczny | is it a shop=butcher selling primarily poultry? | |
| 114266276 by MatthieuMartin @ 2021-11-26 14:33 | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:37 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389277757/history has amenity = water that was added in this editamenity=water? What is this?If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typicallyused.man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.man_made=water_tap wit... |
| 166268868 by ^_^ @ 2025-05-14 17:36 | 1 | 2025-05-14 17:38 | Friendly_Ghost ♦635 | Hi. Please provide a meaningful changeset comment. Thank you. |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 17:58 | ^_^ ♦2 | Hi! I am delete spam names from houses, and change wrong geometry of buildings | |
| 3 | 2025-05-14 18:14 | Mateusz Konieczny | you must provide meaningful changeset comments also in future edits | |
| 166270062 by ^_^ @ 2025-05-14 18:03 | 1 | 2025-05-14 18:06 | Taya_S ♦978 | Hello ^_^,please stop 'fixing' this data. This is part of an ongoing undiscussed import and will almost certainly all need to be deleted later. Other users interfering makes this process more difficult.Best regards,Taya Snijder, on behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 18:13 | Mateusz Konieczny | I PMed them | |
| 3 | 2025-05-14 18:19 | ^_^ ♦2 | ok | |
| 15974175 by schmarn @ 2013-05-04 17:08 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:11 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2291586194/history has amenity = water that was added in this editamenity=water? What is this?If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typicallyused.man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.man_made=water_tap w... |
| 21735370 by bielebog @ 2014-04-16 18:32 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2795082636/history has amenity = water that was added in this editamenity=water? What is this?If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typicallyused.man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.man_made=water_tap w... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 21:02 | bielebog ♦268 | Now that was 11 years ago! :)This might get sorted out by someone on a Streetcomplete Quest though. | |
| 5531371 by Leupi @ 2010-08-18 22:31 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/867524079/history has amenity = water that was added in this editamenity=water? What is this?If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typicallyused.man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.man_made=water_tap wi... |
| 10315746 by rurseekatze @ 2012-01-06 20:41 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1580011680/history has amenity = water that was added in this editamenity=water? What is this?If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typicallyused.man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.man_made=water_tap w... |
| 48231137 by hubbele @ 2017-04-28 15:03 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4823210724/history has amenity = water that was added in this editamenity=water? What is this?If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typicallyused.man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.man_made=water_tap w... |
| 4370643 by Simon Josefsson @ 2010-04-09 08:20 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/689980134/history has amenity = water that was added in this editamenity=water? What is this?If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typicallyused.man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.man_made=water_tap wi... |
| 136066746 by Wim L @ 2023-05-13 20:42 | 1 | 2025-05-14 16:01 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10894634427/history has amenity = water that was added in this editamenity=water? What is this?If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typicallyused.man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.man_made=water_tap ... |
| 117005946 by Tilia_J @ 2022-02-04 13:04 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2678756300/history has shop = spare_parts that was added in this editshop=spare_parts ? What kind of spare parts? Of car parts? specialized machinery? sailing boats? train models? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - thou... |
| 111880754 by NLPOInotes @ 2021-09-29 18:21 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2905817735/history has shop = spare_parts that was added in this editshop=spare_parts ? What kind of spare parts? Of car parts? specialized machinery? sailing boats? train models? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - thou... |
| 138723103 by Ambroeus Milano @ 2023-07-19 15:32 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11055070335/history has shop = spare_parts that was added in this editshop=spare_parts ? What kind of spare parts? Of car parts? specialized machinery? sailing boats? train models? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - tho... |
| 115512462 by aa30mom @ 2021-12-29 10:55 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9375954671/history has shop = spare_parts that was added in this editshop=spare_parts ? What kind of spare parts? Of car parts? specialized machinery? sailing boats? train models? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - thou... |
| 161666327 by Moeiin @ 2025-01-23 09:33 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12525976266/history has shop = spare_parts that was added in this editshop=spare_parts ? What kind of spare parts? Of car parts? specialized machinery? sailing boats? train models? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - tho... |
| 158069306 by Fraxi @ 2024-10-18 22:00 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12264652168/history has shop = spare_parts that was added in this editshop=spare_parts ? What kind of spare parts? Of car parts? specialized machinery? sailing boats? train models? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - tho... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 20:18 | Fraxi ♦128 | Spare parts for tractors and other agricultural machines. See https://scontent.fsof11-1.fna.fbcdn.net/m1/v/t6/An-ZBPNNNX_FjIhrFpU9thHhHM87dO4Z_xui48al8LnV5jeLAQkj7CPIfeFR0dQTLoRLnYn_vi0Cnml6xc-X9CJFJrEy1kysjvs_7zsKJ9DXC9p-WT_sD6JEJMnSDrrAdpCdLuIHQ97sED6BzNgmDw?stp=s2048x1152&_nc_gid=MGo9cqinLuWm... | |
| 163337997 by geraki @ 2025-03-07 17:57 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12643855590/history has shop = spare_parts that was added in this editshop=spare_parts ? What kind of spare parts? Of car parts? specialized machinery? sailing boats? train models? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - tho... |
| 158752593 by maplemoths @ 2024-11-04 18:36 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:54 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12312592031/history has shop = spare_parts that was added in this editshop=spare_parts ? What kind of spare parts? Of car parts? specialized machinery? sailing boats? train models? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - tho... |
| 126248166 by Chesapeake @ 2022-09-16 06:07 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:50 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095074749/history has NO = 1741 that was added in this editWhat is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?Or maybe this key can and should be documented ... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 18:33 | Chesapeake ♦2 | Hello and thanks for the question! I believe my colleagues have directed you to the original user (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/humano) who added those tags on the POI (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1230823158/history) for more information. Best of luck! | |
| 126255657 by Jungfrau9 @ 2022-09-16 09:25 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:50 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095110979/history has NO = 1673 that was added in this editWhat is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?Or maybe this key can and should be documented ... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 18:36 | Jungfrau9 ♦6 | Hello, thank you for the query. This person is no longer on the team, please refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126174651 for additional information regarding the history of these tags. | |
| 126177088 by CranaeIsland @ 2022-09-14 11:30 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:50 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094481908/history has NO = 1847 that was added in this editWhat is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?Or maybe this key can and should be documented ... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 18:37 | CranaeIsland ♦4 | Hello, thank you for the query. This person is no longer on the team, please refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126174651 for additional information regarding the history of these tags. | |
| 126113192 by Masherbrum @ 2022-09-13 05:17 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:49 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094029258/history has NO = 19 that was added in this editWhat is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?Or maybe this key can and should be documented as... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 18:35 | Masherbrum ♦4 | Hi Mateusz, similar to what my colleague explained in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126174651, I simply moved tags over from a POI (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1230822167/history) to the building polygon here. I recommend reaching out to the original user (https://www.openstreetmap.... | |
| 126174651 by NanMadol @ 2022-09-14 10:45 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:49 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094467813/history has NO = 1698 that was added in this editWhat is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?Or maybe this key can and should be documented ... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 18:32 | NanMadol ♦7 | Hi Mateusz, thanks for reaching out about this. In this changeset, I moved information from a POI created by humano (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1230823728/history) to the new building polygon I created (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094467813/history) following the one feature, one elem... | |
| 7754307 by humano @ 2011-04-03 13:43 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:49 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1230824561/history has NO = 2689 that was added in this editWhat is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?Or maybe this key can and should be documented... |
| 104853026 by PurpleLuckyCat @ 2021-05-18 01:13 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:18 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414034531/history has surface:note = not sure if asphalt that was added in this editsurface:note=not sure if asphaltIs it surface=asphalt? If unsure - can you attach a photo? |
| 145117865 by Ariel_Dna @ 2023-12-14 15:48 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:16 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238943661/history has lanes = 0 that was added in this editwhat was wanted to express by using lanes=0 tag? |
| 163696704 by Rawmance @ 2025-03-16 16:28 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:06 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/861158033/history has surface = loose_sand that was added in this editIs there any kind of sand except loose sand? Why not use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dsand ? Note that for earth (that tends to stick more than sand) we have surface=... |
| 159846737 by AssisFS @ 2024-12-02 14:59 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10940063351/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgu... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 14:53 | AssisFS ♦17 | Olá Mateusz, obrigado pelo contato. Sim, apesar no nome sugestivo para hotel (nome: "Nosso hotel"), não se trata de um hotel, pois o mesmo apresenta uma estrutura com quartos pequenos, além de ser administrado pelo próprio dono e o atendimento não &eacut... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-14 15:05 | Mateusz Konieczny | So tag guest_house=hotel is not needed, right?name goes into name tag (name=Nosso Hotel) and actual type into tourism=guest_house | |
| 4 | 2025-05-14 15:29 | AssisFS ♦17 | Sim, concordo contigo! Pronto, corrigido. | |
| 166177000 by Henry141283 @ 2025-05-12 23:37 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:02 | Mateusz Konieczny | revert test edit with bogus "inun" nameshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166261913 |
| 166221110 by Henry141283 @ 2025-05-13 19:41 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:02 | Mateusz Konieczny | revert test edit with bogus "inun" nameshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166261913 |
| 166177688 by Leonelachinchay @ 2025-05-13 00:12 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:02 | Mateusz Konieczny | revert test edit with bogus "inun" nameshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166261894 |
| 166223725 by Leonelachinchay @ 2025-05-13 20:51 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:02 | Mateusz Konieczny | revert test edit with bogus "inun" nameshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166261894 |
| 166231080 by Vanessa Valle @ 2025-05-14 02:05 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:58 | Mateusz Konieczny | revert test edit with bogus "inun" nameshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166261728 |
| 138879055 by JoachimWeber @ 2023-07-23 05:30 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11062734044/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgu... |
| 89322848 by cix99 @ 2020-08-12 21:21 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2689085481/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgue... |
| 148822079 by Innoviù @ 2024-03-18 15:17 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11180744935/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgu... |
| 72990044 by estevelg @ 2019-08-04 13:36 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6681502950/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgue... |
| 151039308 by Kudaliar77 @ 2024-05-08 06:46 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11888338805/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgu... |
| 147432219 by gilimeno-org @ 2024-02-14 02:06 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:51 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6442050166/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgue... |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 00:30 | gilimeno-org ♦1 | It's something in between hotel and guest house, based on the definition in those links. It's run by staff, not the owner, that's onsite 24/7, but are lacking some of the facilities you'd normally expect in a hotel. | |
| 140200146 by Uli Maier @ 2023-08-21 20:41 | 1 | 2025-05-14 12:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5907119352/history has building = proposed that was added in this editIs this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then buildin... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 13:57 | Uli Maier ♦12 | Öffentliche Gebäude zu bauen dauert meistens etwas länger. Die Planungen laufen aber einsprüche von Denkmalsamt und Bauamt verzögern die Realisierung.Alle dargestellten Gebäude sind so vorhanden.Am Tag soll das neue Gebäude etstehen. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-14 14:50 | Mateusz Konieczny | Is "Gemeindezentrum Sankt Konrad" social facility also planned rather than existing right now? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-14 17:59 | Uli Maier ♦12 | "Gemeindezentrum Sankt Konrad" social facility: It consist of a Church a Kindergarden an the room for social meetings is planned behind the sacristia. | |
| 165143780 by idrgnwn @ 2025-04-19 09:02 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12768162064/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgu... |
| 154380183 by damaskus92 @ 2024-07-25 07:52 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12073067859/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgu... |
| 163360841 by Silvain Dupertuis @ 2025-03-08 11:59 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12645267462/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgu... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 19:44 | Silvain Dupertuis ♦1 | I think this is a hotel.Too big for a guest house.Not big enough to be a conference center. | |
| 164319051 by Huyth @ 2025-03-31 08:59 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12715529882/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgu... |
| 124557069 by Hom Vibol @ 2022-08-06 10:56 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1061432067/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgue... |
| 158128174 by เลตรัง กรุ๊ป @ 2024-10-20 13:22 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1583925223/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgue... |
| 158849793 by NN Beach Hotel @ 2024-11-07 10:34 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7668257251/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgue... |
| 117078983 by Akash J @ 2022-02-06 13:24 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9483392887/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgue... |
| 135506844 by neemaelady @ 2023-04-29 14:49 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10186242117/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgu... |
| 134660728 by Kelvin Manase @ 2023-04-08 16:53 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9274424077/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgue... |
| 158004623 by kapazao @ 2024-10-17 11:58 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/558841866/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgues... |
| 2 | 2025-05-17 14:57 | kapazao ♦909 | Hello, I will check it, thank you for the note.Regards | |
| 110469518 by Hotel Anjos @ 2021-08-30 16:09 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:27 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2407716672/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgue... |
| 155889487 by Looney128 @ 2024-08-28 16:26 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:26 | Mateusz Konieczny | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12142420798/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this editWould it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dgu... |