Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-03-17 03:18:20 UTCCloCkWeRX I swapped some of these to 'farmland' (more for the paddocks and similar), as opposed to farmyard (the bit nearer the houses, usually with a shed or two that is bigger than a typical backyard)
12017-02-11 03:30:09 UTCTheSwavu I'm going to go out on a limb here but I'm not sure that the carriageways of Port Road cross over. Unless, of course, this is some sort of SA specific traffic calming ;-)
22017-02-12 10:09:06 UTCCloCkWeRX New thing we are trialling here - Car Gladiators. Two drive in, one drives out!

Its weirdly shaped, because they've dug a bit hole where the northmost lane used to be and put the traffic right next to the other lane - previously separated by a wide median.

I've tweaked the two not to intersect...
12017-02-07 07:45:49 UTCQwertii Woah, how did you add so much so fast?
12016-10-15 13:36:12 UTCtrigpoint Are you absolutely certain about this?
Have you been there and checked? Did this Strava user send you a photo?

Firstly a missing unclassified road in the Midlands has alarm bells ringing, there is as much chance of finding Elvis selling fruit and veg on Leicester Market.
So did you check the av...
22016-10-16 15:11:08 UTCRichard Geograph photos:
32016-10-16 16:28:12 UTCtrigpoint I have changed this to a track
42016-10-16 21:07:12 UTCCloCkWeRX Thanks, that seems a more appropriate modelling
12016-06-14 10:56:34 UTCHugo André Sousa Yes. It still's under construction.
Part of it is constructed, the other is not.
The road is blocked.
22016-06-14 23:05:46 UTCCloCkWeRX Yeah - I split the bits that were physically finished and visible in imagery off from the stuff that wasn't, changeset comment was perhaps a bit broad
12016-06-05 19:21:55 UTCtrigpoint Hi, you seem to have created an isolated way which is going to show up as a problem on QA tools.
What was the source of this service road and should it not be connected to something?
12016-01-14 14:03:06 UTCSomeoneElse What was the routing problem that was previous reported? You've changed 2 derelict_canal ways only here; I can't see how that should affect routing?
22016-01-16 08:22:43 UTCCloCkWeRX The path was intersecting the waterway; but there was clearly not a bridge etc.

I split the waterway either side of the bike path to better reflect was is on the ground/apparent from GPS traces, and satellite imagery.

Given that the canal itself is filled in; I don't think it should be mapped...
32016-01-16 13:46:42 UTCSomeoneElse What is the problem with a path intersecting with a derelict_canal? I can think of several examples locally to me (just a bit north of here) where that happens, where the canal is still very much visible as a derelict_canal but a path crosses it or even runs along it.

Did you try asking the prev...
42016-01-16 14:52:11 UTCCloCkWeRX Feel free to revert/model it better if you have on the ground observations that are more accurate than the GPS traces and satellite imagery; however *even the original way had it documented that it had been filled in*.

Routers really shouldn't direct riders through derelict canals without some k...
12015-10-25 08:37:02 UTCGerdP please review:
highway=bump on node 2309010300
which is not connected to a highway.
What is meant?
22015-11-19 10:22:14 UTCGerdP Ive removed that node now.
32015-11-22 04:01:40 UTCCloCkWeRX That was a speed bump; should have been traffic_calming=bump
42015-11-22 07:51:02 UTCGerdP thanks for the feedback.
Do you remember the road ?
The bump was mapped close to the middle of the roundabout, in that case I see no need to map a bump.
Bing seems to show another obstacle
~20m north of the node, maybe this was meant?
8 changeset(s) created by CloCkWeRX have been discussed with a total of 19 comment(s)