| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60699430 by DaveF | 1 | 2018-07-15 14:06:14 UTC | trigpoint | HI, this seems a very odd edit. In OSM the name should be what appears on the sign, last time I was at Minffordd the signs said Minffordd, Minfford (FR). Again the sign on Hope Station is unlikely to have Derbyshire in brackets.These changes appear to be tagging for the renderer and should be reve... |
| 59799902 by Nigel Callaghan | 1 | 2018-06-14 15:31:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Has the English name changed here? When I was a kid it was always referred to in English as "Black Rock Sands", though the signage in Morfa Bychan was just a sign with "Traeth" written above "Beach". |
| 2 | 2018-07-08 19:01:24 UTC | trigpoint | No response so correcting from local knowledge. | |
| 60308351 by bergmistrz | 1 | 2018-07-08 13:31:42 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, since when to the Co-op have pound shops? Also is that its correct name? and please capitalise names properly. |
| 60385185 by geoffsmith234 | 1 | 2018-07-03 17:36:46 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, Hopleys campsite is already mapped as an area, creating a node is a duplication.I am reverting this change.Cheers Phil |
| 60355963 by Mapchip | 1 | 2018-07-02 19:58:32 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to osm. Thank you for your edit however the park is already mapped you have therefore created a duplicate object which should be removed. However park does seem to be pushing things here as from memory this area is just a bit of grass with a playground and the name seems unlikely.Che... |
| 54291335 by RossA | 1 | 2017-12-04 18:11:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this edit seems very odd and a little wrong.The Cock is primarily a pub, a very good one with 10 handpulls. That is why it was mapped as amenity=pub. It a bit of a stretch to call it a hotel, it has a few rooms hence the accomodation=yes tag, which you seem to have removed. Why do you consid... |
| 2 | 2018-06-28 23:09:46 UTC | trigpoint | No response as to the reason so have reverted based on my local knowledge | |
| 55868602 by Pete Owens | 1 | 2018-06-28 15:50:12 UTC | trigpoint | Why wouldn't it be. Cycling is allowed by default on trunk roads, there is no need for special tags |
| 60108326 by RossA | 1 | 2018-06-28 15:43:20 UTC | trigpoint | If these ways are private, how do customers access the campsite? |
| 59925170 by crispenheadaches | 1 | 2018-06-18 06:54:04 UTC | trigpoint | Please could you explain why you have removed the Spanish name from these objects.Given the subject that is extremely disrespectful and I would consider it vandalism. |
| 2 | 2018-06-19 17:50:05 UTC | trigpoint | Vandalism reverted | |
| 59903770 by crispenheadaches | 1 | 2018-06-17 23:55:51 UTC | trigpoint | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138945314 really 2 lanes, have you been there to check? It certainly doesn't look like 2 lanes on imagery and based on the location I would not expect it to be. Please remember that we map what exists on the ground as incorrect information can lead to incorrect r... |
| 59920586 by terrencem | 1 | 2018-06-17 21:56:56 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please remember that OSM is a live database used by people for real journeys. When we tag roads we make sure that the tags we add are necessary and accurate,There is no point in adding default tags, these just add nothing and clutter the object making it harder for other mappers to spot the re... |
| 59915216 by crispenheadaches | 1 | 2018-06-17 21:37:18 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please could you make changeset comments more meaningful and describe what you are trying to achieve so that other mappers can understand your reasoning.This one is quite big too.From what I can work out you seem to have added placenames to landuse areas. The correct way to do that is using ... |
| 59581246 by Dyserth | 1 | 2018-06-06 16:51:25 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the tracing of the Maize Maze is all very intricate, but we map what actually exists now, not temporary features from about 4 years ago. This existed for a short while around harvest time and autumn half term some years back. Bing imagery is old, mapbox for example is newer. The field is obviou... |
| 59519073 by MttJocy | 1 | 2018-06-05 18:34:08 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, thank you for adding these, however when adding height restrictions you should split the road so the restriction only applies to the actual restricted section rather than add the restriction to the entire road. Cheers Phil |
| 59396503 by AntReid | 1 | 2018-05-30 11:58:16 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, mountain hiking seems a bit extreme for The Ercall although I cannot claim to have any knowledge of sac scales :) |
| 2 | 2018-05-30 13:11:58 UTC | AntReid | It ain't alpine - it's between 25%-33% incline. How should that be categorised? | |
| 3 | 2018-05-30 14:46:35 UTC | trigpoint | I would not have considered it strenuous enough to have a sac scale, but it is hiking at most.Cheers Phil | |
| 4 | 2018-06-03 16:22:16 UTC | trigpoint | I have changed this to hiking, which still seems a bit extreme.Cheers Phil | |
| 59498876 by yuxiang liang | 1 | 2018-06-03 13:23:05 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Please could you explain what the attractions you added actually are? |
| 59453279 by ChrisFoulds | 1 | 2018-06-01 12:56:43 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit however it seems to have gone a little wrong.I can understand the closure of the pub, however has it been demolished as you have removed the building tags too?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-06-01 15:54:24 UTC | ChrisFoulds | Yes it's been knocked down and houses being built | |
| 59353154 by Yorvik Prestigitator | 1 | 2018-05-29 11:19:03 UTC | lakedistrict | Been watching Least Used Stations? :) |
| 2 | 2018-05-29 11:36:28 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | possibly.... :) | |
| 3 | 2018-05-29 18:02:28 UTC | trigpoint | I suspect this is a halt, rather than a station. Will listen to the announcement next time I'm on a Heart of Wales train. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-29 18:12:36 UTC | lakedistrict | It's still a station though isn't it? And what's the difference between station and halt? I thought that the halt tag was more for tourist railways; the wiki isn't very helpful. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-29 18:33:45 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | I thought British Railways/British Rail classified them all as stations to hide how many it was making un-manned in the 60s/70s | |
| 6 | 2018-05-29 18:36:43 UTC | trigpoint | In the UK we map request stops as halts and principle stations as stations. It gives an indication that you will have to go and find the guard, or put your hand out if you want the train to stop.The wiki is confusing, not sure what points have to do with it. By that rule Telford is a halt :) | |
| 7 | 2018-05-29 18:39:48 UTC | trigpoint | They use the term Principal stations.The usual announcement when when my train leaves Shrewsbury is "We shall be calling at the following principle stations, Wem, Whitchurch, Nantwich and Crewe. Yorton, Prees and Wrenbury are request stops and you need to speak to the conductor if you want ... | |
| 59170130 by Pantaloon | 1 | 2018-05-22 07:24:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see you've removed the connection between Merton Place and the service road (ref115), are you sure there is no connecting way at all? Some images show a connection.I've tagged the allotments you mapped as landuse=allotments and remove the area=yes tag which... |
| 2 | 2018-05-22 09:21:25 UTC | Pantaloon | Hi Bernard, there is a connection, but this is used as a rat-run and is not an adopted road; the service road you refer to is actually a bridleway. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-26 12:23:42 UTC | trigpoint | In that case it should be mapped as a bridleway rather than being removed. That will allow it to be used by walkers/cyclists and horses.Cheers Phil | |
| 59292438 by yourealwaysbe | 1 | 2018-05-26 12:07:54 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, your changeset comment suggests that this need an amenity=cafe tag? |
| 2 | 2018-05-26 13:30:21 UTC | yourealwaysbe | You're right. Not sure why there isn't one (the edit cafe comment is automatic when you specify a cafe poi is osmand). I'll fix this when i get better internet access.Thanks. | |
| 59193026 by RAC_UK | 1 | 2018-05-23 17:01:53 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, just wonder why you have removed fhrs:id tags from these places. It a very useful tag.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-05-23 17:13:47 UTC | SK53 | Yes, please DO NOT remove fhrs:id tags. These relate to Food Hygiene data and are used both for verification of data and for assessing progress of mapping on OSM. See for instance: https://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/. In addition they also allow the actual scores on the doors to be retrieved ... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-23 17:17:51 UTC | RAC_UK | Hi Phil,The tags are flagged as 'Mismatched fhrs:id tags' on the FHRS/OSM comparison tool website.Some will have new numbers which I will add over the next few weeks as I take each of the remaining 6 local authorities in turn (Wellingborough is already done)Let me know if you think there is a ... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-23 17:47:47 UTC | SK53 | Hi RIchard,Oh great, you are fully aware of these. I think this was our worry.I move them to old_fhrs:id, others might stick disused:fhrs:id. In general it's better to keep them in some form. The reason being is that often the FHRS was the only source of an address. I have a stash of extract... | |
| 59013369 by ohmanger | 1 | 2018-05-21 11:27:55 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.The name tag should only be used when it is an actual name, It should not be used for a description which in this case can be derived from the tags.Cheers Phil |
| 58963247 by Nick Evers | 1 | 2018-05-18 12:26:53 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this looks a little odd. Tourism=attraction is a very odd way to describe a Training Centre.Cheers Phil |
| 59008673 by AA_NP | 1 | 2018-05-16 11:47:56 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, you have added a node in the same place as the library. Is this correct? Is the library elsewhere? Have you visited to confirm the location?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-05-16 12:02:30 UTC | AA_NP | Hi Phil - The Museum is inside the library - I have been speaking to the owner of the Museum which opened in 2016. Regards | |
| 3 | 2018-05-16 12:15:28 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you, I will update the library to a building with the museum inside.Looks interesting so will pay it a visit.Cheers Phil | |
| 58461290 by John Grubb | 1 | 2018-05-16 12:11:46 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the tag GB:nsl_restricted seems very odd and contradictory. 30/40/50 mph is not National Speed Limit. Is this tag documented or dicussed anywhere?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-05-16 18:04:46 UTC | John Grubb | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Speed_limitsLists 40/50mph as single carriageway limit when for specific vehicle classes for which those limits are default under the "derestriction/national speed limit sign" (white circle with black diagonal stripe). When posted as a signed maximum... | |
| 59000334 by Mao-PU | 1 | 2018-05-16 11:53:57 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this edit covers a very large area and at least 3 countries. Please can you confirm that you have visited all of these places and in future it is helpful to local mappers if you can keep such changes to a sensible area. In the case of road surfaces that would be at most a town or village.Cheer... |
| 2 | 2018-05-20 15:22:50 UTC | Mao-PU | Yes, I can confirm that I have been travelling and to all these places.I used the StreetComplete app to enter the data and set the "Auto-Sync" to "on WiFi only", which might have been the reason for the large number of changes submitted at once. If the large area is a problem... | |
| 58906994 by Modest7 | 1 | 2018-05-13 10:03:48 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, OSM doesn't have an Overlay. What are you fixing? |
| 2 | 2018-05-13 13:53:19 UTC | Modest7 | Hi. There was no common intersection of lines at the intersection, I corrected, the comment is not entirely correct.P.S. "Overlay" means the imposition of lines (roads) on each other. | |
| 58912797 by BROWNING92 | 1 | 2018-05-13 09:05:05 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. I think this edit has gone a little wrong as a field is a very improbable place to find a shop.Please remember that OSM is a geographical database used by many people and applications and we only map what exists in the real world.I am reverting this edit. |
| 58794628 by JavaJedi | 1 | 2018-05-08 18:39:38 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this edit seems to have gone a little wrong. I am a little curious as to why you have replaced these mini roundabouts with actual roundabouts? Imagery confirms they were mapped correctly. |
| 2 | 2018-05-13 08:54:48 UTC | trigpoint | No response so reverting | |
| 58851601 by Jack Daly | 1 | 2018-05-10 16:30:54 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is there really a waterfall here?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-05-10 16:43:08 UTC | Jack Daly | Thanks! Yeah I'm not 100% sure it's on public land though | |
| 3 | 2018-05-13 11:52:45 UTC | trial | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Because your two changes are far away, i would have been much better to send it in two sets. Here you've triggered the clean up of tiles on three continents! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/5885160... | |
| 51553108 by WCML | 1 | 2018-05-10 11:20:44 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this looks like a very odd route. What is the source please? |
| 58448758 by bulzor14 | 1 | 2018-04-27 12:44:55 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, are you sure about this? Have you been there?I suspect the the local mapper who added this got it right and as it is at the end of a quiet residential road it a oneway would be unnecessary. Also if it was oneway it would likely be clockwise?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-04-30 17:05:26 UTC | trigpoint | Armchair fiction reverted | |
| 58228754 by dafyddsion | 1 | 2018-04-20 15:48:41 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.I am not sure this is correct. If the church is derelict it is unlikely to still be a place of worship. Maybe building=church and historic=ruins. The name tag should be an actual name rather than a description, if it doesn't have a name the tag should be omitted.Cheers Phil |
| 58148132 by Drewfus BigMac | 1 | 2018-04-20 09:04:34 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this is a bit confusing. Is it a Premier Inn as in the name, or Travelodge as in the operator tag?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-04-20 17:03:02 UTC | Drewfus BigMac | I just stayed there a couple of days ago. It is a Premier Inn. | |
| 58093875 by hornbydd2 | 1 | 2018-04-14 18:06:24 UTC | trigpoint | Hi. I have just spotted these edits and realise that the name isn't your doing but it would be good if you could correct the name to "Bechan Brook" and add name:cy=" Nant Bechan".Cheers Phil |
| 57930779 by sonmanek | 1 | 2018-04-12 14:17:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,Are you sure about the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83871869/history here? I can understand why you're confused that a road joins a bridleway, but how do you know that this is the road that is wrong, not the other one?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 21:08:14 UTC | robbieonsea | A cursory look at other sources such as Bing, OS_OpenData_Streetview & NLS OS:1:25K sources suggest this is a track/service road to an isolated place in the middle of the Welsh hillsides.Clearly bridleway is closer to reality than an unclassified road, although personally I would have made it ... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 23:09:32 UTC | trigpoint | I can add some local knowledge here, this is a track leading to a what looks like a derelict farm, it is not a bridleway although I do not know its legal status.The road labelled Mountain Track, some name tag abuse, is certainly not a bridleway. It is a track and based on experience the access=no ... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-18 22:25:04 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57858485 by velurib | 1 | 2018-04-06 12:57:13 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I think this edit is incorrect. What is the reason you have made this connection when there is a note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1261647 which clearly says there are bollards at this point?The global range of your edits suggest you are working on some sort of project? Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 17:51:38 UTC | trigpoint | I have reverted this edit. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-18 22:24:30 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57865048 by Crypticelementz | 1 | 2018-04-06 13:57:29 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. I am a bit confused by this edit. What does grass_paver mean and how come you have removed the name from the bank?Cheers Phil |
| 57856018 by velurib | 1 | 2018-04-06 13:08:25 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please can you explain why you believe the highway=residential tag is unnecessary here? It looks to me that a local mapper was expressing something that exists on the ground. |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:25:57 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57860901 by Crypticelementz | 1 | 2018-04-06 13:01:43 UTC | trigpoint | Doodle reverted |
| 57787377 by a4ce49 | 1 | 2018-04-04 11:58:50 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, when did https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/638969930 become a zebra. My memory says it is traffic light controlled, probably a pelican.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-04-04 12:13:26 UTC | a4ce49 | My bad... corrected. Still learning my way around the editor, and changing it to pedestrian crossing seems to have also changed the type to zebra, sorry. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-04 18:31:24 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you | |
| 57518458 by Nicholas De Mouilpied | 1 | 2018-04-02 11:40:25 UTC | trigpoint | Welcome to OSM, thank you for your edit but this looks to be a very odd place for an ATM. If I wanted some cash I would be very disappointed if I had to cross a runway to get to it.Were you intending to put is somewhere else?Cheers Phil |
| 57682274 by Señor Patatas | 1 | 2018-03-31 09:33:53 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I think this has gone a little bit wrong. I don't think the building fills the whole area. It should probably be tagged as amenity=college.In this area it should have a primary name in Welsh. Did you spot one?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-03-31 09:54:51 UTC | Señor Patatas | Hi Phil,Thanks for your comment. I think what you’re seeing is the bounding box. I drew it on satellite view and included the grounds and buildings only. Yes, definitely amenity=college. I thought I’d done that. Agree re Welsh, but this seemed to be all there was on their website. It&r... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-31 13:53:40 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Bryan. You mentioned the website which suggests you have not been there, how were you able to locate it?Cheers Phil | |
| 4 | 2018-03-31 14:26:47 UTC | Señor Patatas | I have not been there but my wife has and is going again next week. The website is:http://www.tynewydd.walesBest wishes,Bryan | |
| 57648857 by Darwin's Tripods | 1 | 2018-03-30 14:23:27 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, some of these changes are a little incorrect. A British pub garden is not the same as a German Biergarten.The wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=biergarten?uselang=enclearly says "To be clear, a biergarten is not the same as (what is known in the UK as) a "... |
| 57627236 by yaswap | 1 | 2018-03-29 16:32:55 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please could you explain this change? What source did you use, have you visiited the location?Tagging the road as private is very odd as it provides connectivity for pedestrians to both a public right of way and a footway crossing the nearby junction.You seem to be making edits all over the ... |
| 2 | 2018-04-02 01:46:17 UTC | yaswap | That was added accidentally. thanks for looking into it. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-18 22:25:55 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57520822 by fatmandave | 1 | 2018-03-26 12:09:06 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I'm a little confused. Why have you changed this cycleway to a footway? |
| 57528529 by Cynghrair Cymunedau | 1 | 2018-03-26 11:48:20 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. This edit seems to have gone a little wrong. The village of Llandough/Llandochau Fach is already mapped, if there is something that needs updating the existing object should be changed rather than adding a new one.The existing object is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2980... |
| 57464003 by Pete Owens | 1 | 2018-03-23 18:55:34 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Pete, you seem to be adding speed limits over quite a wide area and am wondering what source you are using.Also I notice that several people, myself included, have commented on your changesets but you have yet to respond.Cheers Phil |
| 57380341 by AntReid | 1 | 2018-03-22 20:49:21 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for adding these footpaths but you have made a classic beginner error of using the name tag for things that are not names or signed on the ground. But we do have a tag for such things, Eccleshall 84 and such should be put into the prow_ref tag.Cheers Phil |
| 57287271 by erantr1 | 1 | 2018-03-19 11:28:44 UTC | trigpoint | Hello, please can you tell me why you changed this section of cycleway in a residential road?Did you visit recently, what source are you using? |
| 2 | 2018-03-22 15:45:30 UTC | erantr1 | Hello,I will recheck this place.Thanks,Eran. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-22 15:51:08 UTC | trigpoint | Hi EranThank you but how will you do that? What sources are you using?Thanks Phil | |
| 4 | 2018-03-26 10:39:40 UTC | erantr1 | Hi,The change was based on Bing's imagery. In any case, I will recheck it on-site.Thanks for flagging,Eran. | |
| 57287411 by erantr1 | 1 | 2018-03-19 18:41:13 UTC | trigpoint | Are pedestrians and cyclist really not allowed to pass this gate. It seems very unlikely to me. |
| 2 | 2018-03-22 15:41:30 UTC | erantr1 | Hello,This is a good point! I didn't take under consideration pedestrians and cyclists. I removed the private tag, thanks for flagging this.Do you have any other suggestions to handle such a case?Best regards,Eran. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-22 15:48:55 UTC | trigpoint | Hi EranWithout going and having a look there is no way to know what the purpose of this gate is, there is unfortunately no mapillary@trigpoint.me.uk available. My guess is that it is to prevent it being used as rat run so possibly motor_vehicle=private but that is just a guess.Cheers Phil | |
| 57155722 by Rutes Ahmed | 1 | 2018-03-13 23:45:47 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.Thank you for your addition. The name tag is for the actual name, we do not put the postcode in the name. I have moved it to the postal code tag although it is normal to put it on the actual addresses. Post is not delivered to the road.Also it seems a bit odd that these street... |
| 57154145 by HaddonRd | 1 | 2018-03-13 19:04:29 UTC | trigpoint | Why do you say 'not valid'? I can see it on aerial imagery. |
| 57152211 by Alakazami | 1 | 2018-03-13 17:39:56 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM we map what exists on the ground. Waitrose warehouse and My Local are not parks. This is vandalism and is being reverted. |
| 57029045 by Don Dapper | 1 | 2018-03-09 13:18:19 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568194283 is a shared use cycleway/footway. Why would foot access be permissive? |
| 2 | 2018-03-09 15:18:46 UTC | Don Dapper | I think it's something to do with how the traffic order works. No part of the highways is unavailable to pedestrians, so a footway is not "designated" for their use; it is merely the part of the highway that vehicles cannot use: essentially all highways are permissive for pedestrians firs... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-09 15:19:21 UTC | Don Dapper | But traffic orders are generally a dog's breakfast, so who knows! | |
| 4 | 2018-03-09 15:43:13 UTC | trigpoint | But we map what we see on the ground, we do not have permission to map traffic orders.Which brings me to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568192362What evidence is there that this is a cycleway, there are no signs and it just looks like a bit of pavement (sidewalk). There are no markings sayi... | |
| 5 | 2018-03-09 16:45:38 UTC | Don Dapper | The source of the edits is my having been there yesterday and looking at it. The council have just built a cycle track through the junction. | |
| 6 | 2018-03-09 16:47:43 UTC | Don Dapper | I'll get some photos when I'm back in just over a week's time. | |
| 7 | 2018-03-11 09:24:59 UTC | trigpoint | I have seen the cycleway, the signs were a bit hidden when I was driving. It is not oneway however, there are no such signs and it would be very unusual to have a cycleway that is legally oneway.Permissive means that a landowner has given permission for the public to use paths on their land. T... | |
| 57063766 by jesus_army | 1 | 2018-03-10 18:11:44 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I am not sure I understand why you have changed this? The wiki says stations can be mapped as areas or nodes. |
| 2 | 2018-03-10 18:37:17 UTC | jesus_army | True for standard railway stations but the Wiki says that light rail (and subway) stations should be mapped as nodes only.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:station%3Dlight_railhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:station%3Dsubway | |
| 3 | 2018-03-10 19:29:22 UTC | trigpoint | The wiki is intended to document how mappers map, it is not a set of instructions and should be taken with a large pinch of salt.Mapping evolves over time and I suspect this page has not been updated yet.Whilst an underground station would be difficult to map as an area and a node is appropr... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-10 19:33:39 UTC | jesus_army | I understand your point but what led me to this was finding that vector maps from OpenAndroMaps derived from OpenStreetMap data were following the wiki and so not identifying light rail stations that were not nodes. | |
| 5 | 2018-03-10 19:36:12 UTC | trigpoint | I have never heard of OpenAndroMaps, but they should update to reflect improved mapping. We should not tag for the renderer which changing these stations appears to be doing. | |
| 6 | 2018-03-10 19:37:21 UTC | trigpoint | Actually I am not actually sure why a light rail would be mapped differently to any other station. | |
| 7 | 2018-03-10 19:40:37 UTC | jesus_army | On, for example, paper maps such as the UK Ordnance Survey, light rail stations are indicated differently. That's probably a valid reason to make a distinction that can be used by renderers if they so wish, IMHO. | |
| 8 | 2018-03-10 19:42:43 UTC | trigpoint | Maybe they can be different, but that is no reason to hold back improvements in mapping technique. | |
| 9 | 2018-03-10 19:43:56 UTC | jesus_army | OK, but I thought the wiki was meant to reflect the consensus | |
| 55865573 by Pete Owens | 1 | 2018-03-07 17:41:05 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, there is no need to tag foot=yes or bicycle=yes on trunk roads. It is assumed to be allowed unless signed otherwise. It is also not just allowed, they are right of way so the correct tagging would be *=designated.Unnecessary tagging just makes it harder for mappers to spot the important tags.\... |
| 56907118 by saddam kamil | 1 | 2018-03-05 15:55:10 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.I am a little confused by this change as this has always been Church of England, yet you have changed the denomination to Catholic. I believe that this edit should be undone.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-03-05 18:05:01 UTC | trigpoint | You have also removed the building and place of worship tags.I have reverted this | |
| 56632280 by adventure1 | 1 | 2018-02-24 14:09:53 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I am not sure that this will fix the issue with navmii. Oneway is unnecessary on a roundaboutLooking back at the history of this, the problem you are seeing was fixed a year ago and based on my experience of navmii the map data has not been updated. I did express my concern to them at SOTM B... |
| 2 | 2018-02-27 22:22:43 UTC | adventure1 | Possibly true. But the roundabout didn't show as a proper circle on OSM (using Go Map), but a wobbly shape and showed as a two way road. Also Navmii uses the highly accurate what3words addressing system. | |
| 56600277 by HubMiner | 1 | 2018-02-23 16:06:04 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this appears to be an undiscussed mechanical edit. Did you follow the procedure detailed in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct and if so where was it discussed?In my experience the two are different and this type of tag homogenising just makes for a bland map... |
| 2 | 2018-02-23 18:11:49 UTC | HubMiner | Hello, at first I cleaned up different misspells of souvenir, and I got editor warning that "shop=souvenir" is an obsolete value and should not be used.I saw the same mentioned on "gift" wiki, confirming that "gift" covers both:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-23 18:47:54 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, thank you for your reply. I do believe that this change should be undone. It does need discussion, I and other mappers do consider these to be different things, or at least require subtagging.Maybe souvenir should be a subtag of gift, but simply removing that important piece of informati... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-23 19:47:56 UTC | HubMiner | I reverted the changeset; thanks. | |
| 56320592 by Wilias | 1 | 2018-02-13 14:33:31 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this name does not fit the OSM naming convention. The name should be one or the other. Use either alt_name or loc_name tags for other names.Cheers Phil |
| 56292195 by Don Dapper | 1 | 2018-02-12 18:44:36 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this does not fit the wiki description of a living street. It is, as previously tagged a residential street (what it looks like) that has bollards. It is legally a cycleway. Cheers Phil |
| 56280899 by adventure1 | 1 | 2018-02-12 18:36:25 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, something has gone a little wrong here, I doubt that the name of the bus stop has been changed and unless something has been demolished please simply change the tag to disused:amenity=fuel. A close garage is still a landmark.Cheers Phil |
| 55844935 by Beselch Gonzalez Peña | 1 | 2018-01-29 18:49:23 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, what is the source of these edits?Also the name suggests a record shop, however you continue to mistag and in this case have used electronics.Cheers Phil |
| 55718640 by Mike300159 | 1 | 2018-01-28 13:53:22 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, Orrell Park Medical Centre is a very odd name for a church. Are you sure it is correct? |
| 2 | 2018-01-28 21:57:16 UTC | Mike300159 | I live opposite the former Trinity Church, it has been a medical centre and pharmacy for over 5 years | |
| 3 | 2018-01-28 23:00:14 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, thank you for your reply. The building has tags saying it is both a church and a medical centre, this is obviously confusing. Maps.me is a bit Mickey Mouse and doesn't handle this type of change at all well.Would you be able to used the editor from osm.org and fix it? You will need to change... | |
| 55832973 by Uwanker24 | 1 | 2018-01-28 16:27:54 UTC | trigpoint | Doodle reverted |
| 55809018 by _monkey | 1 | 2018-01-28 13:51:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this is a very odd name for a pub, are you sure its not an off-license which would be tagged as shop=alcohol?Cheers Phil |
| 55691690 by JC49 | 1 | 2018-01-23 18:58:00 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the tagging you are using is a bit confusing. On way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555254812#map=16/52.4658/-2.2879 you have used access=private and foot=yes, these values contradict each other. If you can walk but not drive then maybe it should be motor_vehicle=private?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-01-23 19:24:37 UTC | JC49 | Thanks for the comment, and you are quite right. I will make an edit.John | |
| 55630055 by Rovastar | 1 | 2018-01-21 17:17:50 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the shoulder of mutton is already mapped. This is a duplicate.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-01-21 17:49:47 UTC | Rovastar | Yep I have changed that. I wasn't on offline map as it has been added only recently.And I checked it anyway when i got back to my PC.You were so quick to point this out it is boardline stalking | |
| 55543612 by Mark Banks | 1 | 2018-01-18 22:22:09 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the name of a filling station is not going to be Shell, that is the brand they sell and is already correctly tagged. I am reverting this change. |
| 55559688 by edj_ | 1 | 2018-01-18 20:11:53 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the tag tourism=apartment is intended to indicate a place that can be rented for a holiday. It is misleading to use it in this way. You could maybe map the building as building=apartments?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-01-18 20:57:21 UTC | edj_ | My mistake. The app I did it in made it unclear that I did that. I also added it as a node instead of an area. I have corrected this now. | |
| 55546457 by Kiekin | 1 | 2018-01-18 20:10:41 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I am wondering how you decided that Circle Cars is a Logistics company. That involves trucks. It is a taxi office, the name is a big clue.Your armchair edit has now changed the meaning. Please do not remotely fix tags without considering what the mapper who added the tag meant. |
| 55351012 by Kiwibling | 1 | 2018-01-11 12:54:25 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, a building can never be a park. We tag thing as they are You need to consider the question "Is it somewhere I would want to sit and read a book or eat my lunch"? |
| 2 | 2018-01-11 18:44:16 UTC | Kiwibling | Park Wrekin gymnastics is the name of the building / company that own the land as of September 2017 . http://parkwrekingymnastics.comYou can also sit , read a book and eat your lunch in the on site , open to the public “ dinks cafe “ | |
| 55245074 by Fluclo | 1 | 2018-01-08 17:51:55 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please could you add changeset comments so that local mappers can understand what you were trying to achieve.Cheers Phil |
| 55095821 by Darwin's Tripods | 1 | 2018-01-02 23:42:18 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, thank you for your additions but please could you put the references into the prow_ref tag rather than ref.Cheers Phil |
| 55098192 by Peterwhs | 1 | 2018-01-02 17:59:20 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, both La Perla and the Jumeriah Hotel are already mapped. I have reverted this change. |
| 54876484 by Chris112233 | 1 | 2018-01-01 23:45:03 UTC | trigpoint | HiI am really not sure about this edit.Are you sure that the imagery is up to date?This is a long way from your other edits so have you visited the location to check?The area was altered by another mapper a few months ago making me think that it was correct.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-01-01 23:50:26 UTC | trigpoint | Actually I just spotted this notehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5517 I have reverted this change as imagery is clearly out of date.Cheers Phil | |
| 3 | 2018-01-18 14:38:06 UTC | Chris112233 | Sorry about that Phil, hope it didn't cause too much of an inconvenience. I haven't visited this place to check so best to revert it.Chris | |
| 55013010 by Chris112233 | 1 | 2018-01-01 23:12:43 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this looks like a recreation ground rather than a park and sport=basketball is kind of unlikely, it looks more like netball to me.Cheers Phil |
| 55062473 by Chris112233 | 1 | 2018-01-01 23:01:49 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, it has long been the consensus in OSM that the supermarket tag is reserved for larger outlets. Tesco express should be mapped as a convienience store as they only stock a limited range.I have reverted this edit.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2018-01-01 23:04:40 UTC | trigpoint | Sorry, I did not realise it was untagged. I have made it shop=convienience | |
| 55086576 by Nick Evers | 1 | 2018-01-01 22:56:38 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, Bangor on Dee racecourse is already mapped. It is mapped on the other side of the road and is correctly mapped. It is not a tourist attraction.I have reverted this edit. |
| 55087543 by Beselch Gonzalez Peña | 1 | 2018-01-01 22:53:58 UTC | trigpoint | HI, what is the source of these edits?Please could you tag them correctly, they are not gift shops.Cheers Phil |
| 55067754 by Peterwhs | 1 | 2018-01-01 21:00:28 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, Chanel seem a bit of an odd name for a Jewelers? Should it be tagged as shop=perfume?Cheers Phil |
| 55027913 by LynTho | 1 | 2017-12-30 21:11:02 UTC | trigpoint | Already mapped |
| 55037946 by Technician2 | 1 | 2017-12-30 21:10:16 UTC | trigpoint | What is the correct name for this? |
| 54984439 by Elle Atkins | 1 | 2017-12-29 20:59:03 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I am assuming that these are some sort of personal markers? Free Parking is a very unlikely name for a shop.Please remember that OSM is a public database and we only add what exists in the real world |
| 54931129 by Nicholas Lucchi | 1 | 2017-12-29 20:48:05 UTC | trigpoint | This is a very odd place for a castle |
| 54983296 by Peterwhs | 1 | 2017-12-29 20:45:11 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, waitrose is already mapped. I have removed this duplication |
| 54820809 by Rovastar | 1 | 2017-12-25 16:05:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, should Costco filling station be tagged as access=private. They tend to be very selective about who they sell to.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-12-26 19:55:43 UTC | Rovastar | I am not sure this needs to be changed. Are all costco stores access=private? Surely the same applies to the stops too. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-26 20:33:02 UTC | trigpoint | I do think that the shops should also be tagged as access=private. They are only open to members, and membership is only open to certain select groups. | |
| 4 | 2017-12-26 23:20:45 UTC | Rovastar | I am not sure the UK OSM community agrees with that given what tag info says about Costco. | |
| 5 | 2017-12-26 23:25:37 UTC | trigpoint | Even though they will turn most of us away? | |
| 6 | 2017-12-27 15:20:07 UTC | trigpoint | Even though they will turn most of us away? | |
| 7 | 2018-01-01 19:35:40 UTC | SK53 | I dont think Costco & the like should not be mapped as supermarkets: cash & carry is the general british term & carries with it the connotations that access is restricted. This was discussed long ago and for whatever reason people did like supermarket. Hey-ho, so now we need supermarket=... | |
| 54902958 by Moretonmill | 1 | 2017-12-25 20:56:21 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the name field should only be used for actual names. Information like this should be put in a description or note field.Cheers Phil |
| 54821064 by Rovastar | 1 | 2017-12-25 15:54:33 UTC | trigpoint | Is this shop really called Home bargains (Feb 2018)? |
| 2 | 2017-12-26 19:53:44 UTC | Rovastar | yep i need to change that | |
| 54907457 by Beselch Gonzalez Peña | 1 | 2017-12-25 15:40:35 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, these edits are continuing to mistag these music shops as gift shops.Please also state what the source you are using is, they are too spread out to be the result of a survey.Cheers Phil |
| 54886865 by Faz Filipino | 1 | 2017-12-24 16:59:16 UTC | GinaroZ | Hi, why have you changed this to a motorway? |
| 2 | 2017-12-24 17:25:09 UTC | trigpoint | I have reverted this, but still hope the mapper responds. What does Dfdi mean? | |
| 54873377 by L2TP | 1 | 2017-12-23 22:07:22 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to osm. This edit looks a little odd. I have never heard the term turning loop in the context of a UK road, and at the junction of a B road is especially odd. If anything is here I would expect a mini roundabout.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-12-24 16:46:03 UTC | trigpoint | No response, but fixed as it is clearly a mini roundabout from imagery | |
| 54789346 by Will Hensman | 1 | 2017-12-23 22:25:58 UTC | GinaroZ | Hi, there's two Co-ops mapped here, as both supermarket and convenience - which one is correct? |
| 2 | 2017-12-24 16:42:42 UTC | trigpoint | Size suggests it should be a convienience store. | |
| 54701892 by SMGARD | 1 | 2017-12-24 11:31:02 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this shop is tagged as 'car_parts', but has only 'service:bicycle' - what do they sell?http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5289640237Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2017-12-24 16:41:21 UTC | trigpoint | Halfords is one of the names that says, more or less, everything you need to know.Its not easy to define but most UK based people will know exactly what to expect.It sells car parts and accessories. But they also sell bikes and maybe service them. Some locations will offer a fitting service for ... | |
| 51702416 by mapper999 | 1 | 2017-12-22 21:07:56 UTC | trigpoint | HiWhat is the source of this information?I am wondering why you have ended this relation at Shrewsbury as it operates at least to Crewe.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-12-23 15:17:27 UTC | mapper999 | Hi Phil,I used this line occasionaly, but I was not aware that some of the trains operate further than Shrewsbury. Feel free to add the part between Shrewsbury and Crewe to the relation. | |
| 54847269 by Beselch Gonzalez Peña | 1 | 2017-12-22 19:18:58 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, these shops you are adding appear to be record shops. It is very misleading to tag them as gift shops. Please tag them correctly as shop=music.Cheers Phil |
| 54815522 by trigpoint | 1 | 2017-12-21 17:45:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Trigpoint, I think you may have removed this clinic in error. This was/is a separate private clinic :- http://www.uniclinic.co.uk/en/ address 635B Cranbrook RoadThe Scan Clinic http://thescanclinic.co.uk/about is at address 635A Cranbrook Road. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-12-22 16:09:59 UTC | trigpoint | Oh, it looked like a duplicate, plus the mistagging as a hospital and spam description.It all seems too small as it is just a house. | |
| 54283647 by fatmandave | 1 | 2017-12-21 13:41:06 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.This edit has gone a little wrong, the Battlefield recycling centre is already mapped, this building is the incinerator.Cheers Phil |
| 54547327 by Don Dapper | 1 | 2017-12-11 19:38:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, adding a vague proposal such as this is a little pointless. It probably will never be built and if it is it will almost certainly be a different line. And there is always hope that the cinema will reopen, or be rebuilt on the site where it is accessible without a car. |
| 54293247 by Alexandru Lipan | 1 | 2017-12-05 18:43:53 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, is the delivery office really a Post Office? Do they sell stamps, pay out pensions? |
| 2 | 2017-12-10 19:21:26 UTC | Alexandru Lipan | Hello, not properly a post office, but is under Royal Mail. Is a post office as linked to postage activity, without any tipe of auxiliar activities. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-10 19:38:03 UTC | trigpoint | In the UK, The Post Office and Royal Mail are separate organisations.From a post office I would expect it to sell stamps, pay cheques into the bank and send parcels.A delivery office is not something that is customer facing beyond occasionally collecting something. | |
| 4 | 2017-12-10 23:51:36 UTC | Alexandru Lipan | I know, but services are based on Royal Mail sistem. Consdiering that other tags for that building that describes the actual function are not aviable, I selected the most logical tag following tecnical details the activity is based upon. | |
| 5 | 2017-12-15 00:24:45 UTC | SK53 | Either use amenity=delivery_office or amenity=postal_depot not amenity=post_office. The former is probably better, but the latter is more popular. Note in many larger places the delivery office is out of town in an industrial estate: locating them can be difficult they need to be tagged distinctly. | |
| 54515238 by Mümin ÖZPOLAT | 1 | 2017-12-10 18:58:43 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome tto OSM. Please remember that OSM is a live database, please do not add test data.I have reverted this edit. |
| 2 | 2018-01-09 19:06:45 UTC | RobJN | If you do want to test in a safe environment then create a new account on the following test website:http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ | |
| 54457373 by Eleanor Michie | 1 | 2017-12-08 13:17:04 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your addition however the tagging is a little misleading.If it needs a key then it should be tagged as access=private, neding a key is not the generally regarded as permissive. You should also map the gates and connect it to Barlow Moor Road.Cheers Phil |
| 54400840 by tom lilzinho | 1 | 2017-12-06 13:35:35 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to osm. This edit has gone a bit wrong, the park is already mapped and you have created a duplicate. |
| 54396599 by joshuaowen | 1 | 2017-12-06 12:46:59 UTC | trigpoint | Hi JoshuaCostcutter should be tagged as shop=convienience.Cheers Phil |
| 54368396 by Moretonmill | 1 | 2017-12-06 12:45:11 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, what is the source of this bridleway. It seems highly unlikely given the current ownership.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-12-06 17:36:27 UTC | Moretonmill | Dear Phil,I know what you mean. What with the generous use of barbed wire, the illegal gates and the threatening signs (shooting!), they seem to be trying to discourage walkers.However there's a planning sign for a bridle way on the gate post at O/S Grid 567277. I photographed it, but can't fi... | |
| 54376474 by rab | 1 | 2017-12-05 19:09:18 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, these edits seems a little wrong. Please can you explain why you are deleting things that are deleting these things?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-12-05 19:36:03 UTC | Harry Wood | You seem to be deleting all data as it is added by during a mapathon event this evening. This includes new mappers having their first OpenStreetMap edits stamped out. We also see you sabotaging the tasking manager validation statuses (This project https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/3913 ) I'm sitti... | |
| 54317993 by DottyBekki | 1 | 2017-12-05 18:25:19 UTC | trigpoint | Why have you done this? It is considered vandalism |
| 54318024 by DottyBekki | 1 | 2017-12-05 18:24:04 UTC | trigpoint | Why have you removed the retail tag? |
| 54361986 by DottyBekki | 1 | 2017-12-05 18:23:06 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, there is no doubt that Telford Town park is a park. Please do not confuse things by adding recreation ground as well |
| 54373499 by Zombie13 | 1 | 2017-12-05 17:56:18 UTC | trigpoint | Fiction reverted |
| 2 | 2017-12-05 18:54:14 UTC | Zombie13 | Cheers just joined poor attempt at testing. | |
| 54357150 by DottyBekki | 1 | 2017-12-05 12:50:43 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this edit looks a bit odd. If motor vehicles are allowed why have you changed it to a footpath. What is physically on the ground?Cheers Phil |
| 54204478 by mueschel | 1 | 2017-12-04 18:18:30 UTC | trigpoint | HiThese 'heritage:operator' tags you have added seem a little odd. What is the source of this information. Did you visit these sites to confirm?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-12-04 18:56:09 UTC | mueschel | Hi Phil,I didn't add them, this was brianboru in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54115710I just corrected the spelling from an '_' to a ':', assuming it was just a spelling mistake and the content was correct.Jan | |
| 54270137 by Ricky1248 | 1 | 2017-12-02 14:19:03 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.Please do not map things that do not exist, there is no park here so I am reverting this edit. |
| 54254726 by mattstroud81 | 1 | 2017-12-02 12:10:24 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. This area is a recreation ground. Clearly visible on imagery. Please do not map what doesn't exist or destroy the rich variation of tagging in order to attract pokemon.I have reverted this |
| 54262685 by ChipperP | 1 | 2017-12-02 12:03:14 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however no shop is just called Tesco. They are Tesco Metro/Extra/Express. The size of this one suggests express to me, please can you confirm |
| 54235616 by Bricey | 1 | 2017-12-01 22:46:49 UTC | paulbiv | As you were previously asked, the same applies.Welcome to OSM. Have you added a park that doesn't really exist to try to attract Pokémon? The 'park' seem to over the top of people's gardens, or am I wrong?Pokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to work. |
| 2 | 2017-12-02 11:53:00 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted | |
| 3 | 2017-12-02 12:57:28 UTC | paulbiv | Thanks Trigpoint | |
| 45531171 by Bricey | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:52:18 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Have you added a park that doesn't really exist to try to attract Pokémon? The 'park' seem to over the top of people's gardens, or am I wrong?Pokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to work. |
| 2 | 2017-12-02 11:52:49 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted | |
| 54178153 by mjnvl | 1 | 2017-11-29 18:11:02 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. I spotted this edit and thought the name you have used is slightly odd for a bay. Porth means sand, so correct for the beach. I have corrected its name should be Bae Trecastell and also put Cable Bay into the name:en tag, rather than an alternative.Cheers Phil |
| 54082640 by Heyheyitshay | 1 | 2017-11-26 12:13:46 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this path is confusing me a bit. Have you actually walked it as I would imagine that it is private as it passes through the school.Cheers Phil |
| 54011728 by tubbai11 | 1 | 2017-11-23 19:24:43 UTC | trigpoint | Hello, what do you mean by route=old_bus?Cheers Phil |
| 53953065 by AJT | 1 | 2017-11-22 18:03:13 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, mapping a single house as a multipolygon is a bit odd. Any special reason?Cheers Phil |
| 53919677 by Anneleen carolus | 1 | 2017-11-19 11:16:19 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. This edit has gone a little wrong. Victoria Park is already mapped so I have removed you duplication.Please add things that are missing or make corrections but please do not duplicate existing features. |
| 53663023 by yorkhousedentists | 1 | 2017-11-10 11:46:19 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to Osm. Your dental surgery is already mapped on the other side of the road.Which is correct? |
| 53625588 by Lejzi Kowalski | 1 | 2017-11-09 20:06:28 UTC | trigpoint | This is an odd place for a tourist attraction, I am removing it. Let me know if there is something here that I should go and see.Cheers Phil |
| 53561126 by Moretonmill | 1 | 2017-11-07 18:30:26 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this should be mapped as amenity=parking. Its name isn't CAR PARK.Cheers Phil |
| 53324698 by Richard Carden | 1 | 2017-10-31 18:15:27 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, just spotted an odd changeset comment an wondered why an American is editing in Cheshire.However the edit has gone a little bit wrong, give ways should be put on the ways to which they apply and not on the common node. Traffic using the A49 does give way by The Cholmondeley Arms.Give way nod... |
| 2 | 2017-11-03 23:30:11 UTC | Richard Carden | I'm not American and I consider that a degradation, I'm British and live locally but I don't know how to add give way/stop signs specific for our country. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-04 18:06:17 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, sorry I didn't mean to insult you, I had just spotted the American term for a give way in your changeset comment.I have corrected the give ways you added, in most cases there are two giveway signs, one on each road approaching the junction.Cheers Phil | |
| 53489883 by Nuno Salgueiro | 1 | 2017-11-04 14:01:04 UTC | trigpoint | Since when has Worthen been in Wales? |
| 2 | 2017-11-04 14:40:31 UTC | Nuno Salgueiro | My friend moved from Welshpool to Worthen recently. For some reason, I still think he's living in Wales. :) | |
| 3 | 2017-11-04 14:58:31 UTC | trigpoint | No problem. Worthen is in Shropshire, England but not far from Wales. | |
| 52179661 by NorthIsland | 1 | 2017-10-25 12:04:02 UTC | trigpoint | Hihttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525909748 is farmland from my memory and local knowledge. Why is it tagged as a park?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-10-25 17:31:06 UTC | NorthIsland | Hi trigpoint. I'm not a local to the Llangollen Canal but I've visited quite a lot, and done walks. It was sparsely mapped. I couldn't visit this area but on Esri Images it appears as undulating ground with scattered trees. I use the mapping principle that: if it's ploughed it's farmland, if it's g... | |
| 53150520 by canujustnip | 1 | 2017-10-22 17:10:43 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. You seem to have created an object with no attributes so I am going to revert this.Please can you add meaningful comments so we can work out what you are trying to achieve. |
| 53058454 by joshuaowen | 1 | 2017-10-20 13:05:40 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Joshua, is there anything verifiable here to suggest these are taxi ranks?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-10-20 13:10:41 UTC | joshuaowen | Hi Phil, These are all the pickups for taxis for southwater with it being pedestrianised. I work within the taxi industry so i know these are the spots areas for taxis | |
| 3 | 2017-10-20 13:11:58 UTC | joshuaowen | there is also a rank by the bus station but it is closed due to road works so it is currently send over to the tgi fridays. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-20 14:05:22 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you. The tagging in OSM does seem very limited, I would assume that amenity=taxi referred to a taxi office and there would be a way to tag a taxi rank in a different way (maybe use highway=taxi_rank in the same way as a bus stop). But this is the way the wiki says.Cheers Phil | |
| 53087976 by joshuaowen | 1 | 2017-10-20 08:55:32 UTC | trigpoint | It is just Wilco, it does not belong to someone called Wilco :) |
| 2 | 2017-10-20 09:07:04 UTC | joshuaowen | never thought of that haha. ive changed it now | |
| 53031746 by joshuaowen | 1 | 2017-10-19 12:03:22 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I would expect the name Wilko rather than Wilkinsons these days. Probably tag it as shop=homeware although its one of those difficult ones.Cheers Phil |
| 52997146 by Horia1985 | 1 | 2017-10-17 05:30:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Can you give more details of the guest house, address, website, property located in.Features added to the OSM database must be verifiable on the ground and there's not enough info to determine this features position, (in a front garden). So it ought to be corre... |
| 2 | 2017-10-17 09:32:40 UTC | trigpoint | Size of building suggests that this is a very unlikely place for a guest house.Probably yet more maps.me personal marker rubbish | |
| 3 | 2017-10-17 10:04:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi trigpoint, I agree,and a response would be unusual but I usually wait a few days so a response could be made before going back and removing fiction. Also the house numbers in the building don't look right. Regards Bernard | |
| 52906707 by joshuaowen | 1 | 2017-10-14 09:31:55 UTC | trigpoint | Hi JoshuaThank you for this edit, I've been thinking I need to wander around it with a GPS.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175478082 is a service road, it would be good if you could split it where it connects to Yew Tree Meadow and extend Yew Tree Meadow to join Queensway.Cheers Phil |
| 52785731 by Will Bailey | 1 | 2017-10-11 12:03:31 UTC | trigpoint | Hi WillWelcome to OSM. Please do not use highway=corridor, it is a bit historic and frowned upon these days. Indoor mapping of corridors is normally highway=footway and indoor=yes. Obviously in this case it needs splitting where is outside the building. In multilevel buildings it will be useful to... |
| 2 | 2017-10-11 12:54:41 UTC | Will Bailey | Thanks for letting me know, Phil. That's now been updated on all edits | |
| 52786455 by S Ingleby (DEE) | 1 | 2017-10-10 10:28:22 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to osm, please could you explain why you have deleted several driveways?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-10-10 17:15:14 UTC | trigpoint | -- Reply was received privately, please follow the link to the changeset to keep comments visible to the community --Hi SteveThank you for your reply. I spotted your edit as it always makes me nervous when a new mapper starts by deleting objects that are the work of other mappers because they ... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-10 18:37:24 UTC | S Ingleby (DEE) | Hi Phil,Thanks for your information. I agree to not deleting any more driveways.However, please can you let me know if I can modify the map as it stands (as opposed to adding information)? For example, today I have:-a) Deleted two short sections of isolated paths located on top of buildin... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-10 19:00:20 UTC | trigpoint | Hi SteveThere is no problem with improving things, or removing them if the are wrong.Changing part of a footway to a driveway is fine, we map what is on the ground. If for example a public footpath goes along a driveway then map it as a driveway but ensure you add access tags foot=yes and design... | |
| 52772329 by Pounamu | 1 | 2017-10-09 21:40:17 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to Osm. Thank you for your edits however I have a few observations.Firstly keep your edits to sensible areas, generally editing POIs should be one. town at a time, certainly not spread over two continents.Secondly why did you change The House of Grain to a bar, it looks like a re... |
| 2 | 2017-10-09 21:53:29 UTC | Pounamu | I actually have no idea how this was created, I certainly did not mean to. How can I undo this?I work at the House of Grain and was just updating details about the place. It is both a bar and a restaurant but primarily a bar. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-09 21:59:34 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you for replying, I was looking at the menu on my way from the loggerheads last week. Was the update in florida intended? | |
| 4 | 2017-10-09 22:07:12 UTC | Pounamu | Yes, I did not even search, select, edit, or even look at Florida so have no idea how this happened? I also cannot for the life of me find anywhere to undo / delete edits I have made. This is way more complicated than it needs to be. | |
| 5 | 2017-10-09 22:17:24 UTC | Pounamu | Ah okay so I've figured out what has happened. It is not Florida, it is actually a cafe in Havana, Cuba. It is an edit I made on my Maps.me app on my phone whilst I was there a few months ago to help the owners but having only just registered on OpenStreetMap and signed in on the app, it has just on... | |
| 51882623 by Risteárd Cearbhaill | 1 | 2017-10-09 20:22:13 UTC | trigpoint | What is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178237699?It bears no resemblence to either bing of mapbox imagery and overlaps the doctors? |
| 52118445 by Mark Dev | 1 | 2017-10-09 15:31:57 UTC | ACS1986 | Hi Mark,I assume you didn't mean to delete the whole of National Cycle Network Route 55 relation?Adam |
| 2 | 2017-10-09 18:04:18 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you for spotting this Adam, I have fixed it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52766965Cheers Phil | |
| 3 | 2017-10-09 19:04:02 UTC | Mark Dev | I did not intend to delete the whole of it no. JOSM was complaining about issues with the cycle route. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-09 20:11:06 UTC | trigpoint | JOSM complains about lots of things, sometimes you just have to ignore it.Cheers Phil | |
| 44977817 by Risteárd Cearbhaill | 1 | 2017-10-09 12:10:12 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this is not a hospital in the modern sense of the word. Is there any evidence against my long term local knowledge that suggest it has now become a hospital? |
| 52709536 by CathyH2808 | 1 | 2017-10-08 17:01:43 UTC | trigpoint | In what way is Yew Tree House an attraction? |
| 2 | 2017-10-09 09:21:05 UTC | CathyH2808 | Only In the same way as other houses on the street. They are listed (e.g. Jessamine Cottage). Why is this a problem? It helps visitors to the village know exactly where they are. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-09 09:22:21 UTC | CathyH2808 | If you wish to remove this listing, I will feel disappointed but won't argue about it. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-09 09:26:44 UTC | trigpoint | There is no need to remove it. The name should be moved to addr:housename field and tourism=attraction should be removed as it is not somewhere tourists would visit.Cheers Phil | |
| 5 | 2017-10-09 09:43:41 UTC | CathyH2808 | PhilI am not techy(!) You may have already gathered this. I can't seem to amend the category or know how to follow your instructions (though I am happy to do so!)Please can you explain to a numpty exactly how & what changes I need to make & when I get another break from work I will actio... | |
| 6 | 2017-10-09 16:53:56 UTC | freebeer | Hi Cathy,I see that user SK53 has corrected this.What Phil was referring to is what I see far too often in english-speaking countries where the app, maps.me, is in use.That is, far too many items are given a default to be a tourist attraction.In other-language countries, other defaults appea... | |
| 7 | 2017-10-10 12:29:10 UTC | CathyH2808 | Thank you so much for your comments. Very useful! Won't touch Maps.me again though in case I get it wrong again! You're a star! 👍 | |
| 8 | 2017-10-11 13:46:37 UTC | SK53 | Forgot to mention I'd changed it! From aerial imagery it looks as if the house is a slightly different shape from that shown.With maps.me you can also add a note which puts a marker on the map saying something like "Yew Tree House".Someday I'll do more mapping in Hickling, last tim... | |
| 52709499 by CathyH2808 | 1 | 2017-10-08 17:01:08 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Please do not mistag things, this is described as a clinic so it should not be mapped as a hospital as that is extremely misleading for other map users.Please use amenity=clinic, you may need to use a proper OSM editor such as iD to change this. |
| 2 | 2017-10-09 09:25:58 UTC | CathyH2808 | I didn't deliberately mislead anyone. You are right - this is a clinic NOT a hospital but "hospital" was the closest category I could choose to the medical context of the business. If you could explain how I can accurately describe/amend the details, I would be happy to oblige. | |
| 52627613 by Gobster | 1 | 2017-10-05 12:02:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this was originally mapped as a recreation ground. OS Opendata call it a recreation ground, I would call it a recreation ground. Why did you change it and what is the source of the name?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-10-05 12:30:36 UTC | Gobster | Hi, I visited the location in person a few days ago as I live local. To me it seemed more like a park with the kids play area, however I'd rather take your word for it as you sound like you have more experience than me. My apologies for the mistake.The name "Thurmaston Doorstep Green" is... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-05 12:40:43 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you for your reply.Places with childrens playgrounds and grassy areas for sport are recreation grounds and are far more common. Parks are for more formal places such as Abbey Park for example.Cheers Phil | |
| 4 | 2017-10-05 12:50:12 UTC | Gobster | Still new to this so I really appreciate the help. I've changed it back to Recreation Ground. Thank you for your help!Gavin | |
| 52593474 by Griffyn | 1 | 2017-10-03 11:57:07 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your conribution however it has gone a little wrong. When adding things do please look at the map and ensure that they do not already exist. We also have a rule of one real life object=one osm object.Swansea West Fire Station was already mapped as a relation. Yo... |
| 51758719 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-10-02 17:51:15 UTC | trigpoint | I have removed the wikidata tags from the statue of Charles Darwin and the bust of Mary Webb.I had linked to wikipedia sections on commemerations, not to articles about the person. The wikdata refers to the person, which is not correct in this case.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-10-02 18:16:52 UTC | nyuriks | Thanks! I think it would be better to use "subject:wikidata" for both of them. As for the wikipedia link - its a link to part of the page - which means the wiki page is not "about the feature" - so perhaps we should use something like "related:wikipedia" ? | |
| 48951250 by smb1001 | 1 | 2017-10-02 12:01:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, what on the ground evidence do you have that Watling Street is in modern usage on for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5061100 ? have you been there and seen a sign?Adding names that do not exist on the ground is very misleading to map users, would the residents of Frodesley who live... |
| 2 | 2017-10-02 12:14:49 UTC | smb1001 | An entirely valid point and I wasn't aware that I'd added the name (though I clearly did!) as I entirely agree with you. The name is on the Roman road relation now, so I've removed them. Thanks for spotting. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-02 12:19:27 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you | |
| 52428611 by joshuaowen | 1 | 2017-09-29 14:09:28 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, what is the source of Telford Estate, those who live there say they live in Monkmoor. |
| 52420815 by Batareikin | 1 | 2017-09-27 21:14:10 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the names you are adding appear to be transliterations which should not be added to OSM. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliterationLast time I was in Telford or Wellington there were certainly no Russian Names on the signs.This edit should be reverted. |
| 2 | 2017-09-27 23:28:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Batareikin,You've been asked by other mappers many times before to not add transliterations or data from unknown sources - see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=127299 for details. Please respect the wishes of the community. I'm sure for example that http://www.ope... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-28 06:10:16 UTC | Batareikin | Hi trigpoint, Andy TownsendЕсли не знаете или забыли, то напомню Вам, что русские топонимы НЕ ТРАНСЛИТЕРИЮТСЯ, а ТРАНСКРИБИРУЮТСЯ! И разницу меду этими понятиями надо понимать... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-28 15:44:45 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you tell me where I can verify that Castle Bytham does indeed have a separate Russian name (as distinct from any transliteration? | |
| 5 | 2017-09-28 18:14:37 UTC | Batareikin | SomeoneElse: Конечно могу сказать. Только Вы опять упоминаете какую-то "any transliteration". 1. Вы разницу между транскрипцией и транслитерацией понимаете? 2. Вы знаете о т... | |
| 6 | 2017-09-28 19:49:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you answer the question?Can you tell me where I can verify that Castle Bytham does indeed have a Russian name? Anyone can make up a name for any place by any method they like. I could decide that London is actually called Fintlwoodlwix, and create a map showing that. It doesn't, howev... | |
| 7 | 2017-09-29 06:12:40 UTC | Batareikin | Я могу ответить на ваш вопрос.Только сначала Вы попробуйте ответить на мои вопросы.Тогда может и ваш вопрос отпадет сами собой.Каждый не сможет "make up " топо... | |
| 8 | 2017-09-29 08:58:46 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Но если вы хотите проверить правильность написания например деревни Касл-Байтем, то вам надо зайти в какую-нибудь российскуй библиотеку и взять почитать "Вел... | |
| 9 | 2017-09-29 09:00:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Два момента - во-первых, тот, кто написал это, просто транслитерировал его с английского, а во-вторых, вы импортируете данные из внешнего источника. Прочтите https://wiki.op... | |
| 10 | 2017-09-29 18:46:26 UTC | Batareikin | Два момента:Во первых - НЕ ТРАНСЛИТЕРИРОВАЛ его! И совсем не просто!Во вторых я ничего НЕ ИМПОРТИРОВАЛ, тем более автоматически! Весь текст на русском я набираю ... | |
| 11 | 2017-09-29 18:50:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | Er - no need to shout! | |
| 12 | 2017-09-29 18:53:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Весь текст на русском я набираю на клавиатуре смартфона. But where did you copy it from? If it's something like a book, what is the licence? | |
| 13 | 2017-09-30 12:47:17 UTC | Batareikin | Я не кричу, я просто делаю акценты на слова, чтобы вы пристально обратили на них внимание и попытались понять смысл всего сказанного мною ранее (курсива или жирного ... | |
| 14 | 2017-09-30 12:51:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Неужели у вас в Великобритании слово London кому-то принадлежит!? И откуда его скопировали?А на использование слова Liverpool у вас тоже должна иметься лицензия, чтобы ... | |
| 15 | 2017-09-30 13:12:55 UTC | SomeoneElse | > Вы конечно можете не знать, но у нас отдельные слова не являются объектами авторского права. Их нельзя присвоить себе и соответственно нельзя наложить на них огр... | |
| 16 | 2017-10-05 19:22:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Asking again, in case the notification for the previous one somehow got lost:Please do explain where you found the name "Касл-Байтем", where you copied it from, and what licence applies to that data. Please also explain how I may verify that name the next time that I visit Cast... | |
| 17 | 2017-10-17 13:05:38 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53011130 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names that appear to have been copied from a Russian library book. See block 1591 and changeset 52420815 for the attempt to find out licence details (or where the names may be veri... | |
| 18 | 2017-10-18 19:22:58 UTC | Batareikin | Энди ТаунсендВам же объяснили что слова сами по себе не являются объектами авторского права. Они не могут облагаться какой либо лицензией. И не могут быть несовме... | |
| 52305211 by Pemberton | 1 | 2017-09-23 16:49:32 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this edit looks a bit odd. Costa is not normally an internet cafe, in fact I have never heard of them providing computers. I would also expect it to be in a building rather than the road. |
| 52280417 by Delta79 | 1 | 2017-09-23 16:06:57 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, has the car park been built on? If so then it would be better to delete it as the area was already residential and you now have a residential polygon with another residential polygon.Cheers Phil |
| 52276836 by Old John | 1 | 2017-09-23 12:15:20 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I assume this should be Bill's Bar rather than Bill's Bar Bar?Cheers Phil |
| 52238824 by mikej1810 | 1 | 2017-09-22 13:48:12 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the correct way to tag a closed pub is to change the amenity tag to disused:amenity=pub. I would leave the name in place if it is still visible.Cheers Phil |
| 52196925 by joshuaowen | 1 | 2017-09-21 12:00:38 UTC | trigpoint | Power league is a very odd surface, I assume it should be in name? |
| 52128706 by joshuaowen | 1 | 2017-09-21 11:54:51 UTC | trigpoint | HiIn OSM we have a rule of one feature, one object in OSM. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_elementThere is only one hospital, so different departments should not have an amenity-hospital tag.Please remember that OSM is a geographic database, so please do not map to ... |
| 52181464 by kjon | 1 | 2017-09-19 21:00:17 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please could you explain why you made this change?OSM has a system of free tagging which allows mappers to express what they see, and survey regularly, on the ground. The aim is not database purity. The word candy was chosen to express what is sold there.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-09-19 21:13:45 UTC | trigpoint | Also what is the source you used to find the postcode? | |
| 3 | 2017-09-20 08:15:07 UTC | kjon | i spotted a spelling mistake in the name (Mollies's instead of the Mollie's).According to wiki, shop=confectionery should be used for candy shops as it has the same meaning.the postcode is from www.originalshrewsbury.co.ukfeel free to change or revert any of my changes if you consider it a bet... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-20 17:40:27 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you for fixing the spelling. I am removing the address information, I am not certain that the address is correct as it moved and that number doesn't seem right, and a bit pointless as retail places rarely display a number.The website you quoted clearly says that it is copyright so you sh... | |
| 52116614 by PeterSW | 1 | 2017-09-17 14:01:20 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the website should refer to the object you are mapping and should not be the company's website.Cheers Phil |
| 52072233 by Yousuf Ali | 1 | 2017-09-16 11:49:57 UTC | trigpoint | Fiction reverted |
| 52073070 by Yousuf Ali | 1 | 2017-09-16 11:49:36 UTC | trigpoint | Fiction reverted |
| 52051747 by LankyRambler | 1 | 2017-09-16 11:46:53 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, The Range is normally tagged as shop=variety, tagging it as doityourself is very misleading. |
| 52089260 by LankyRambler | 1 | 2017-09-16 11:43:09 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I don't think this is an actual shop. It should be tagged as office=company as they only sell online.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-09-23 14:06:40 UTC | ACS1986 | It's probably a year since I last went but it was always possible to buy or collect goods from the onsite sales point. | |
| 51938077 by mueschel | 1 | 2017-09-14 12:46:54 UTC | trigpoint | What does GPB mean? |
| 2 | 2017-09-14 18:26:51 UTC | freebeer | GRRRRREAT Pr*>pop<*thudKLONK*itish bounds...Has anybody seen me teeth? | |
| 3 | 2017-09-14 19:51:44 UTC | mueschel | Sure... it was "currency:gbp", I wanted to fix it to capital letters... and mixed them up. Thanks for pointing out!Jan | |
| 51874636 by pwat | 1 | 2017-09-09 10:53:24 UTC | robert | Welcome to OSM!Looks like a good edit to me... |
| 2 | 2017-09-09 11:09:55 UTC | pwat | Thanks. Not bikeworthy! | |
| 3 | 2017-09-09 12:10:14 UTC | trigpoint | Not sure it was intended to be bikeworthy, its a bridleway. Good edit | |
| 4 | 2017-09-10 16:24:34 UTC | pwat | Cheers. Flipping GPS syndrome. Route created in "Bike" mode with "Avoid unsurfaced" selected. But unless OSM contains the full data, OsmAnd often makes the optimistic assumption. Fortunately it didn't involve a dire diversion on this occasion. | |
| 45726397 by themistakebythelake | 1 | 2017-09-09 08:42:25 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong. The wikipedia/wikidata tags you have added to Penhurst Station belong to the one in Kent.I have removed these tags.Cheers Phil |
| 51209458 by Gabriel Reynolds | 1 | 2017-09-07 11:58:16 UTC | trigpoint | J21 is not called, or signposted Whetstone. If anything it is Leicester South, Why did you name it with such a name? |
| 51765819 by robbieonsea | 1 | 2017-09-06 11:56:08 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Robbie, did you spot the ancient yew trees? I need to work out how to map them. |
| 2 | 2017-09-07 08:29:26 UTC | robbieonsea | No not especially, as I passed by relatively rapidly on bicycle.Saw some old Yew trees in Powis Castle Gardens the next day though (not mapped yet either). | |
| 51765928 by DannyWith | 1 | 2017-09-06 11:54:21 UTC | trigpoint | HI, rather than add disused=yes you need to change the amenity tag. The normal way we do this is to use disused:amenity=bar. I am not sure many data consumers will look at disused=yes.Cheers Phil |
| 51692910 by joshuaowen | 1 | 2017-09-03 14:39:07 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, Maddocks Social Club should be tagged as amenity=social_club. It is misleading to tag it as a pub as it is not open to the public.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-09-03 15:13:17 UTC | joshuaowen | I have had a look and i cannot find anything actually saying social club. I can find social facility if that is better? i assumed pub would have been suitable as half of it is open as a pub its only the snooker club half that is not open | |
| 3 | 2017-09-03 15:45:08 UTC | trigpoint | I have done a quick check and The Maddocks Club certainly refers to membership so it is certainly not what most would consider a pub.You do not have to stick to the limited set of tags offered by one particular editor, you can choose your own.For example the Social Club is used 530 times, ht... | |
| 51690751 by ferrocarta | 1 | 2017-09-03 14:06:47 UTC | trigpoint | Please can you explain the reason for these edits and your source?For example the Cambrian to Pwllheli is not in my experience ( and local knowledge ) a branch line.The station nodes you have 'added' already existed and are now duplicated.Cheers phil |
| 2 | 2017-09-03 14:15:02 UTC | ferrocarta | Hi Phil,this line didn't have a "usage" tag, which is used to distinguish between main tracks and service tracks (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:usage). The choice between "usage=main" and "usage=branch" depends on the importance of the line and can be debated... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-03 14:18:01 UTC | ferrocarta | About station nodes, these should not be created as part of the track but should be independent nodes according to OSM guidelines (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Stations_.2F_Stops or http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations). | |
| 4 | 2017-09-03 14:30:32 UTC | trigpoint | Thank youI would suggest that the Pwhelli line is of equal importance, it does not have a lesser service than Aberystwyth, so I agree the tag was missing but it should be main as well. | |
| 5 | 2017-09-03 14:38:00 UTC | ferrocarta | Fine with me, I'll update the station nodes now and the usage tag by tomorrow.Cheers,Jean-Marc | |
| 51692837 by ferrocarta | 1 | 2017-09-03 14:24:44 UTC | trigpoint | When adding information please be aware of local language usage, there should be a name:en tag, as there was previously. What goes in the name tag is the subject of community debate, The name that is first on the sign, or what is on the sign Barmouth / Abermaw.Also when mapping in bilingual areas ... |
| 2 | 2017-09-03 14:30:28 UTC | ferrocarta | That's ok, the tags from the track node can all be transferred to the station node. | |
| 51682044 by TR42 | 1 | 2017-09-03 08:48:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello TR42,In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51621108 I tried to explain the problems associated with "colouring in" large swathes as heathland without paying attention to the detail. You're still doing it here - if you look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.82126/-3.4... |
| 2 | 2017-09-03 11:44:40 UTC | trigpoint | I would also like to add that last time I was on The Berwyns it was not an area I would describe as heath, it is mostly moorland. As a local I find it quite concerning that my local area is being mismapped in this way.Phil | |
| 3 | 2017-09-04 10:39:57 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51714984 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of poor-quality edits following discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-September/020576.html | |
| 51652490 by tafkam | 1 | 2017-09-02 14:56:34 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this edit has gone very wrong. You have changed the whole of Littlehampton into a school. I am not sure what you were trying to achieve but I have reverted this edit.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-09-02 15:06:34 UTC | tafkam | Apologies! Think it must have been an accidental click on the wrong line around Littlehampton Academy - thanks for correcting it! | |
| 51630089 by TR42 | 1 | 2017-09-01 12:41:25 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please do not mistag for the renderer.In your comments you state "using heath tag to represent fell, fell tag doesn't do anything."Please remember that OSM is a geographical database which is interpreted by many different renderers, mapnik being just one. Maybe there is a renderer ... |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 10:39:58 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51714984 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of poor-quality edits following discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-September/020576.html | |
| 51485710 by aaronsta | 1 | 2017-08-30 18:40:36 UTC | trigpoint | Hi. This edit appears to be mechanical, did you follow the guidelines at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct, where was the discussion.The reason I ask is that I can se you did not check the changes you were making as ways 385848816 & 385848826 are now tagged... |
| 2 | 2017-08-31 04:00:16 UTC | aaronsta | Hi trigpoint,Each way was tagged by hand. This is not an automated edit as described by the link your provided, although the use of an editing program (automation) increased the speed of the process. To verify the validity of the intersection, each change made in the edit including tagging was don... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-31 04:00:56 UTC | aaronsta | Correction to previous: your > you | |
| 51446663 by joshuaowen | 1 | 2017-08-30 11:47:07 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this has gone a liitle wrong.Please do not add buildings inside buildings, for example A&E is not a building. You could maybe add a node for named departments, but please do not abuse the name field of objects. Names you have included such as main entrance are descriptions and do not belon... |
| 43706675 by Christian Ledermann | 1 | 2017-08-29 13:17:32 UTC | trigpoint | Hi ChristianI was suspicious of this edit when I first saw this edit, I finally got around to checking it at the weekend and could not find any evidence of a school in this area. It is entirely made up of residential properties.I suggest that in this case the database is in error and that this s... |
| 51448190 by joshuaowen | 1 | 2017-08-29 11:38:28 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM, You seem to have undone the change from Staples to Office Outlet I made after a survey. Why did you change it? The signs on the building were changed and Staples no longer exists in the UK. |
| 51440318 by Julie Davies | 1 | 2017-08-26 09:56:51 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit however it has gone a little wrong. Not your fault, maps.me has a long standing issue that they seem reluctant to resolve where rather than update the name tag it puts the new name into name:en.I assume you are trying to change the name of the cafe to Gr... |
| 51437904 by Michele Giunta | 1 | 2017-08-25 17:17:25 UTC | trigpoint | Hi welcome to OSM. Please map things accurately and based on location and the fact you added a dead sheep note I really doubt it is a public drinking fountain. You have also added a camp site twice, however it was already mapped.I am therefore reverting your changes |
| 2 | 2017-09-23 15:14:11 UTC | Michele Giunta | Hi,regarding the camping site I listed 03° 40'54.41"S, 35°56'52.69"EThe actual name is "Wild Palm" not "Wild Pamp". Can you please correct it?Cheers | |
| 51166065 by schwall | 1 | 2017-08-16 11:58:43 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, you seem to have added a source:maxspeed with no maxspeed.Also GB:rural is meaningless, there is no such thing as a rural limit. We have a national speed limit and tag source:maxspeed as either gb_nsl_single or gb_nsl_dual.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-08-16 12:50:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info, the most used values are at http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/maxspeed%3Atype#values . | |
| 51112498 by u003f | 1 | 2017-08-14 18:05:01 UTC | trigpoint | Should this be tagged as tourism=guesthouse? |
| 50538045 by Jan van Bekkum | 1 | 2017-08-11 15:48:38 UTC | SK53 | I dont think you meant waterway=lock_gate in this edit. Probably barrier=gate, access=no, note=locked. The adjacent access point should be tagged barrier=stile, stile=stepover, step_count=2, material=wood and ideally the footway should cross the stile not go through the gate |
| 2 | 2017-08-11 16:24:31 UTC | trigpoint | The other common barrier on the rights of way, which you may have encoutered, is a kissing gate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kissing_gate, these are mapped as barrier=kissing_gateHTH Phil | |
| 3 | 2017-08-11 19:20:53 UTC | Jan van Bekkum | There are two barriers. The one on the footpath just north of the track to the bridge is a squeezer stile, the one just south of it is a stepover stile. I have amended the map accordingly. Furthermore I removed an .untagged way that was on ot of the footpath. | |
| 51003776 by Jan van Bekkum | 1 | 2017-08-11 15:31:14 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, thank you for the edit however I have spotted that you have added a mapillary photo, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=8crBQK1pS4XgOgjOWTrQ9g&lat=50.88072166666666&lng=-0.539789166666651&z=17This is a stile, not a gate, and should be tagged as barrier=stileC... |
| 2 | 2017-08-11 19:06:46 UTC | Jan van Bekkum | Corrected | |
| 50943658 by msevilla00 | 1 | 2017-08-08 13:36:04 UTC | msevilla00 | I edited using this overpass query:http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qSrand following this OSM Wiki advice:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Walesand as you could see in Streets:https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/BVAjyV5Yt6hediIk7Lqv4w |
| 2 | 2017-08-09 16:41:50 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi, it is incorrect to a set the name field in the format "Welsh Name/English Name". If a name has two language variants, use name:cy for the Welsh and name:en for the English, and choose one of the two names for the name field, preferably the one which is the more commonly used. Many of t... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-09 21:57:05 UTC | msevilla00 | I disagree with you.If you please read the wiki you will read how to tag in multilingual situations.First, "name" tag could be use as you can see in street sings [1]. You can check on Mapillary how are labelled [2][3]Second, "Welsh name / English name" label for "... | |
| 4 | 2017-08-09 22:45:36 UTC | msevilla00 | I traslated this topic to the mailining list for General discussion for users in Great Britain:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-August/020465.htmlPlease, consider to joint the conversation there to argue within the British community.Cheers | |
| 5 | 2017-08-09 22:57:20 UTC | alejandroscf | Hi! I agree with Miguel, if the official name is both Welsh and English it's OK to set the name to "Welsh Name/English Name" and also tag it with the correct localized tags.Best regards,Alejandroscf | |
| 6 | 2017-08-10 06:22:57 UTC | escada | I cannot comment on the specific situation in Wales, but in Brussels, Belgium we have a similar situation. All streets have a Dutch and a French name. Neither one is more important than the other. We use name:fr - name:nl in the name field. Although we accept to opposite order as well.We even have... | |
| 7 | 2017-08-10 11:48:13 UTC | trigpoint | Whilst in the past I have generally used the first name on the sign (usually name:cy) as name I am coming around to this way of thinking so do not disagree with the changes made by Miguel.The norm in Wales is to have both names on the sign, much like in Brussels, even in Maelor Saesneg / English... | |
| 8 | 2017-08-10 16:54:21 UTC | RobJN | Whilst we are having this conversation, can we agree the format. I see 3 choices:"Morfa Mawr / Queen's Road""Morfa Mawr - Queen's Road""Morfa Mawr;Queen's Road"The Belgium community uses the second, the use of ";" in the third is well established. ... | |
| 9 | 2017-08-10 17:08:54 UTC | trigpoint | " / " is used throughout Wales in these cases and therefore has usage and momentum.It is the one I would favour as it is clearly a separator. A hyphen could be easily confused. | |
| 10 | 2017-08-10 19:38:05 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Quoting from the Wales tagging guidelines, at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names "As such, I reckon that you should set the name tag to the Welsh name in areas where the Welsh language has a high concentration of native speakers, and use name:en for the English name in such ... | |
| 11 | 2017-08-14 20:36:09 UTC | msevilla00 | Hello again,If you came now to this discussion you may notice something happens in the wiki. A British user changed it after the discussion in the talk-gb mailing list:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-August/020493.htmlI disagree with the change and I consider it arbi... | |
| 50807366 by topdog5000 | 1 | 2017-08-04 14:40:08 UTC | trigpoint | No, the clue is in the name |
| 50736771 by TR42 | 1 | 2017-08-01 11:15:29 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, what is the source of this change. Have you actually surveyed it?For example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282802359 has lights, but I have not seen them switched on for several years. |
| 50697188 by Boothy99 | 1 | 2017-07-30 20:51:22 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, Ye Olde Boote Inn is already mapped as a building, although only 4 days ago.I am removing the duplication. |
| 2 | 2017-07-31 08:49:22 UTC | Boothy99 | Hi trigpoint,No worries - thanks for letting me know. We called in the (very old) pub the other day, and I was surprised not to find it on OsmAnd / OpenStreetMap so added it. Glad it's on in full now. Great pub btw :-) Cheers,Dave. | |
| 50579112 by HOsborn3 | 1 | 2017-07-26 11:04:49 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to Osm. Please remember that OSM is a public database. This edit, combined with your note, makes me think that this is some sort of personal marker. If you want to save or share a location then there is the mapshare button on osm.org. Cheers Phil |
| 50561953 by jakednb | 1 | 2017-07-25 16:44:15 UTC | trigpoint | Dinas Emrys is not here, please can you make you changeset comments a bit more meaningful and say what you are actually doing? |
| 50539799 by e3b45 | 1 | 2017-07-24 20:47:14 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added the publishers twice. I suggest you delete one of the points.Feel free to ask any questions. |
| 2 | 2017-07-24 21:25:52 UTC | e3b45 | OSMAND wasnt uploading so tried a couple of times and one must of uploaded without confirming. How do I delete? Can't see an option on firefox for android | |
| 3 | 2017-07-25 16:41:29 UTC | trigpoint | Also I assume that the node should be in one of the buildings, please could you reposition it? | |
| 4 | 2017-07-25 21:50:17 UTC | e3b45 | I moved the POI and deleted the duplicate. | |
| 50441450 by gerpsych | 1 | 2017-07-20 21:29:56 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, if a place of worship is no longer active you should remove those tags, along with religion. If it is house you may want to use building=chapel |
| 2 | 2017-07-20 22:00:26 UTC | gerpsych | Thanks | |
| 50210978 by trigpoint | 1 | 2017-07-20 15:54:52 UTC | DaveF | HiI'm adding NCN4 relation to the new roundabout. Were any cycle lanes included in the construction an were the feeder lanes as short as you've mapped them?? |
| 2 | 2017-07-20 18:11:29 UTC | trigpoint | There are no cycle lanes, feeder lanes are short as mapped. They are traced from gps. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-20 19:33:11 UTC | trigpoint | I was there last week. I have fixed it, and the Atlantic Coast Route, now to try to fix the bus routes and the slashed road names :)I had added the roundabout whilst there, but the relations were too big for my laptop/mobile connection | |
| 50385685 by _Stuz | 1 | 2017-07-18 19:59:31 UTC | DaveF | Hi Welcome to OSMhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168838411/history#map=16/51.3151/-2.5058Are you sure this is path is permissive?It's got the Limestone link route + http://tinyurl.com/yclgfah4 |
| 2 | 2017-07-18 20:08:31 UTC | _Stuz | My understanding is that there are actually two parallel paths here. The extant one here corresponds with my GPS survey of the permissive path (marked with notices along its length). The technical public right of way is slightly to the north, and hasn't been surveyed. I'm intending to do a more comp... | |
| 3 | 2017-07-18 20:20:23 UTC | DaveF | Great. Do you know if any of the construction site can now be converted to residential area? | |
| 4 | 2017-07-19 19:59:11 UTC | _Stuz | I've now surveyed Limstone Link, and made appropriate adjustments.I haven't yet determined the current bounds of the construction zone. | |
| 5 | 2017-07-20 08:42:03 UTC | DaveF | Excellent, looks good. Did the impassible bit look like it was intentional? | |
| 6 | 2017-07-20 09:00:40 UTC | _Stuz | Very overgrown, no evidence of a stile (that I could see) at the field boundary along the RoW route. I think the farmer essentially wants the RoW to be unofficially diverted on to the parallel permissive way, and is discouraging foot traffic on the RoW as much as possible. | |
| 7 | 2017-07-20 11:46:54 UTC | trigpoint | Please report it to the local highway authority and Ramblers | |
| 50385034 by Dimon Budurin | 1 | 2017-07-18 17:32:19 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Wifi in a shelter is very unusual and as you are using maps.me I am assuming this is a personal marker.I am removing this edit |
| 50243932 by Gabriel Reynolds | 1 | 2017-07-13 11:13:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, what is the source of this addition? I assume you have not been there and surveyed it.Also there is little point in adding proposals, it may not happen and if it does the proposed route will just be deleted so that it can be surveyed properly. |
| 49843438 by Crombo | 1 | 2017-06-26 18:58:24 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM however I think this edit has gone a little wrong. You seem to have placed this bar in the openspace around the war memorial and the location does not match the address.Please could you move it to its correct location. Ask if you need any help.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-06-26 19:11:43 UTC | Crombo | Ah yes it's on the wrong side of the road it seems and the details used were what was registered on another service. is there any way to move it across the road? Cheers | |
| 3 | 2017-06-26 19:17:03 UTC | Crombo | Also believe I should have registered it under "Smithfield" not "Ball Haye Street" | |
| 4 | 2017-06-26 19:37:53 UTC | trigpoint | You can simply drag it. But you must only map such things from your own memory/knowledge. Copying from other sources is an absolute no no, not even to check your memory. | |
| 5 | 2017-06-26 19:52:08 UTC | Crombo | Okay thank you! I can assure you it is there it's actually where I work. Looked at adding it as it seems the new SnapMap feature uses OSM. Will look at changing it as soon as possible. Cheers | |
| 6 | 2017-06-26 19:54:23 UTC | Crombo | I can't seem to drag it on my iPad. Will try again as soon as I have a computer handy. | |
| 49828051 by Cheap Car Insurance San Diego | 1 | 2017-06-26 07:15:21 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to osm. I am wondering why you would add a business based in California in Cheshire? |
| 49769444 by Martin Wynne | 1 | 2017-06-23 14:23:02 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Martin, is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502622232 really a park? It looks a very odd place for a park, and aerial imagery suggests it isn't.Also it is bad practice to join areas such as this to the centreline of roads. The area will end at the edge and should be mapped as such.Cheers P... |
| 2 | 2017-06-23 15:34:17 UTC | Martin Wynne | Hi Phil,I use "park" for any public green space with trees or shrubs, because there doesn't seem to be any other designation available. I have noticed the same used in lots of other places on OSM. "Grass" is ok for plain grass, but this clearly isn't that - see: https://goo.gl... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-23 17:02:11 UTC | chillly | mapping landuse boundaries to the centre lines of roads is not good practice. Your explanation sounds good, but in practice we don't do it. Creating a map image is only one use of OSM data and whatever your renderer of choice does to make the result neatest is not a good justification. A park, or an... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-23 17:12:05 UTC | EdLoach | Personally I'd have mapped it as an area of (mostly) grass and perhaps added an occasional natural=tree node (similarly when I mark an area as wood or forest I don't usually map holes for every clearing in the trees). I also don't like to think about the amount of time I've had to spend ungluing lan... | |
| 5 | 2017-06-23 17:17:04 UTC | trigpoint | Please do not tag for the render, a park should only be used for area that are really parks. Mapping is not about making something appear a particular colour on one particular renderer. If I had brought my grandkids here because OSM says there is a park then they and I will be pretty pissed off.Fr... | |
| 6 | 2017-06-23 17:24:45 UTC | Martin Wynne | Hi Ed, You wrote " (in this case I'd have probably extended the residential area across the residential roads to the edge of the grass area)."This surely illustrates my point - a road is no more a residential area than it is a park.I found this on the Wiki: "If you choose to l... | |
| 7 | 2017-06-23 17:24:55 UTC | trigpoint | Hi MartinI forgot to say we do not have permission to use g.maps so please do not look at it, use it to check something, use it to illustrate something. Mapping must be done from what you have seen by being there, imagery we have permission to use, and out of copyright maps and information. | |
| 8 | 2017-06-23 17:33:26 UTC | Martin Wynne | Hi Phil,It is clearly not scrub. There is a suggestion on the Wiki to make it village_green for public green space, but that doesn't sound right here.If you want to visit a proper municipal park, it is likely to have a name, such as "Jubilee Gardens" or whatever.p.s. I have sta... | |
| 9 | 2017-06-23 17:43:35 UTC | Martin Wynne | p.s. I have been there. I use Google Streetview only to confirm my memory of what I saw. Mostly I use OS OpenData to align buildings, water-courses, etc. Also the NLS 25K maps are very useful. The Bing aerial is very poor quality for seeing details.Will the NLS 25" historic maps ever be ava... | |
| 49750345 by kawabill | 1 | 2017-06-22 17:50:16 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I am pleased you enjoyed your stay. I have tidied the building to match its outline and removed the operator tag, booking.com are not the operator.I have also removed the word English from the description, the owners may not be best pleased to hear their breakfast described as English. Maybe W... |
| 49711993 by Martin Wynne | 1 | 2017-06-21 15:30:09 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Martin, just wondering why you have changed The Severn Valley from railway=preserved to railway=rail?It was a perserved railway last time I was there.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-06-21 17:24:10 UTC | Martin Wynne | Hi Phil,I was trying to get OSM to show the line through Bewdley Tunnel as a dotted line. If I set railway=preserved it shows the line in pale grey and there is no difference for the track in the tunnel - which looks daft under Birchen Coppice.I don't think the SVR calls itself a preserved r... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-22 11:49:44 UTC | trigpoint | Hi MartinThank you for your reply.Firstly please remember that OSM is primarily a database, which is rendered in many different ways and you seem be changing the tagging to overcome a problem that exists with just one of many renderers. That is called 'tagging for the renderer' which should not ... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-22 13:02:24 UTC | Martin Wynne | Hi Phil,Thanks for your reply.I would think that OSM is primarily a map (the clue being in the name), rather than a database. A map should show what is physically present on the ground, which in this case is a standard-gauge railway in working order. The frequency and types of trains doesn't... | |
| 5 | 2017-06-22 17:03:52 UTC | trigpoint | Hi MartinOSM is primarily a geographic database which can be rendered in many different styles. What you see on the main page is a few styles but anybody can set up a renderer and define their own. The reason for the different tagging is for different uses is years of consensus among the communi... | |
| 45179522 by andyfrizzle | 1 | 2017-06-14 06:44:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, Just wanted to point out that the way "highway=unclassifiedref=U3064" (south section) that you've added duplicates the ways that are already mapped on that route. The duplication of highways seriously disrupts any attempt by software to route over these ways.At the river y... |
| 2 | 2017-06-14 13:21:19 UTC | andyfrizzle | BCNorwich, Thanks for the feedback. I've reviewed and hopefully correctly amended the highways. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-15 16:58:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Andy, I have a few concerns about these edits.You have changed this way from a track to unclassified and included the surface=unpaved, in the UK it is reasonable to expect an unclassified road to be surfaced, I believe that unless it has been surfaced it should have been left as a track.What ... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-15 18:17:51 UTC | andyfrizzle | trigpoint, I dont want to start an argument of any sort, but it was my understanding that contributors to the OSM project should make their contributions as accurate as possible, and that has been my intention, based on facts.The road, edited by myself, is an unclassified road, lawfully usable b... | |
| 5 | 2017-06-16 11:51:40 UTC | SK53 | This does indeed appear to be classified as an unclassified road by the county council. There will always be edge cases where the rules-of-thumb fall down, and this is one of them. I don't believe that it should be mapped as such on OSM: highway=track is much more appropriate. A couple of important ... | |
| 6 | 2017-06-16 11:58:07 UTC | Richard | highway=unclassified, surface=unpaved is ok but slightly unidiomatic for UK mapping. There's nothing wrong with it per se - there are lots of dirt roads in the States mapped that way, for example - but it's slightly unexpected in a UK context where highway=unclassified isn't used by custom for such ... | |
| 7 | 2017-06-16 12:05:46 UTC | SK53 | Just thought I'd add links to the similar highways which I mentioned earlier:Tillington, West Sussex: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273951783Two in Marefield, Leics:Red Lodge Road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198802841Blackspinney Lane: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19515... | |
| 8 | 2017-06-16 14:03:04 UTC | andyfrizzle | Thanks for the further input, I have no problems making the amendments as suggested prior. Northumberland has a vast network of unsurfaced unclassified roads with vastly varying roads surfaces. I would not be surprised is there are more than a hundred in this county alone. I will try and work throug... | |
| 9 | 2017-06-16 14:22:24 UTC | SK53 | Thanks Andy. I've added this to the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#Unpaved_Country_Roads. It's largely based on the discussion here, but I should also add some examples from Northumberland too. I think pressure of use in SE England, Peak District etc has l... | |
| 49419358 by Russ McD | 1 | 2017-06-12 15:19:05 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this edit appears to have quite a bit of serious mistagging that could inconvienience other map users.Travis Perkins is a builders merchant, not an outdoor shop.Western Power Distribution is not an electronics shop, probably tag it as office=company, its not somewhere the public will normall... |
| 2 | 2017-06-12 16:04:17 UTC | Russ McD | Noted.. I was using that piece of shit Maps.me that offers only a limited range of tags. Nothing for builders merchant, and OK the Garden centre does have the word Ramsey in from of it ... I'll add it. I get round to amending these edits once back home on the PC, which I will do today. As a commun... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-12 16:43:19 UTC | trigpoint | Thanks Russ | |
| 49286761 by mueschel | 1 | 2017-06-07 20:15:57 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this gate looks a little wrong as it has 3 ways connecting to it. It needs to be separate from the junction otherwise it is impossible to tell which routes pass through the gate,Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-06-07 20:17:26 UTC | mueschel | Hi,that's not my work, it was added by http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49075370Cheers, Jan | |
| 3 | 2017-06-07 20:46:10 UTC | trigpoint | Hi JanSorry, I will see if I can work it out.Cheers Phil | |
| 49314731 by Lewis Phipps | 1 | 2017-06-06 19:20:25 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution but please could you keep changes to sensible areas as it makes it very difficult for otheer mapper to review changes.Cheers Phil |
| 49217593 by elegni | 1 | 2017-06-03 17:57:35 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. This changeset has gone a little wrong. You have made a classic beginner error of using the name field as a description. The name should only be use when an object has a name, I don't think this is called 'Detatched houses'.Also for mapbox imagery I can see that this should be ... |
| 49225349 by ThatKidPan | 1 | 2017-06-03 17:45:01 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. You seem to have changed several recreation grounds to parks, objects should be mapped as what they are and these are different things. |
| 49218964 by Mani76 | 1 | 2017-06-03 17:07:17 UTC | trigpoint | Is there really a bar. in the middle of the road and in what is clearly a residential area.I somehow doubt it, reverted. |
| 49163885 by coalporter | 1 | 2017-06-01 16:42:24 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions, they look good.A couple of small things that would be helpful:If you could tag rights of way with a designation tag i.e. designation=public_bridleway, public_footpath.Rather thatn the description it would be better if you could add a short sect... |
| 2 | 2017-06-01 17:50:00 UTC | coalporter | Thanks for your input; I've made some further changes to address these issues. One question: can the designation replace the individual access tags? I seem to remember that not all renderers will honour the designations, so for the moment I've just added it as an extra tag (although it obviously... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-01 19:46:55 UTC | coalporter | Of course, that should have read "elephant trap". | |
| 48968263 by mary wang | 1 | 2017-05-25 11:59:12 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Something has gone a little wrong here. You have added the name funeral home to a banks atm. As far as I can see there was no duplicate bank.Also could you correct the name of the co-op to what is signed, usually Co-Operative Food,Thanks |
| 48865452 by Steve Cazwell | 1 | 2017-05-22 16:25:29 UTC | trigpoint | Again are you sure this isn't Lloyds Pharmacy? |
| 2 | 2017-05-23 19:11:04 UTC | Steve Cazwell | Yes changed to Lloyds Pharmacy. Not Pharmacist as I mistakenly typed originally. 😊 | |
| 48859364 by Jethro10 | 1 | 2017-05-21 15:54:35 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the name suggests that this should be tagged as leisure=fitness_centre, a shop=sport is a place selling sports equipment. |
| 2 | 2017-05-21 17:40:15 UTC | Jethro10 | It's a shop. Sells primarily running gear. It's not a gym or similar | |
| 3 | 2017-05-21 17:59:03 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you, the name implies a gym type place. Was just checking . | |
| 48851365 by Steve Cazwell | 1 | 2017-05-21 15:50:22 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, are you sure this isn't Lloyds Pharmacy? |
| 48862646 by Jenni74 | 1 | 2017-05-21 13:58:31 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however you have made a few classic beginners mistakes.The school is already mapped, you have therefore created a duplicate. The name tag should only be used for things that have an actual name, hence bus stop, church, postbox are descriptions that sh... |
| 48834097 by kreuzschnabel | 1 | 2017-05-20 15:21:03 UTC | kreuzschnabel | These were the last landuse=farm on the British Isles, so please don’t add new ones :-) And just in time we were, the new carto revision (which will not render landuse=farm any more) seems to have been switched active a few hours later. |
| 2 | 2017-05-20 15:53:18 UTC | trigpoint | It was never a pressing issue, farm/farmland is of dubious values consiting of vast areas armchaired by crayonists. It.adds very little value to those of us using OSM in rural areas.Many areas close to me were poorly drawn with connections to roads/rivers (not riverbank) and I had left them until ... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-20 16:08:22 UTC | kreuzschnabel | I agree that landuse=farmland is of pretty little use (moreover, it’s not clearly defined from landuse=meadow, so there are areas already where these two collide). landuse=farmyard, on the other hand, is of higher value for the walker or bicyclist, and I wouldn’t really like to miss them... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-20 16:35:26 UTC | trigpoint | I would agree farmyard is far more important than farmland itself. It is afterall the default state of non urban areas. It is a big shame that meadow has been so badly misused, it should be a rare but useful tag. Most.is simply pasture.If we are going to map farmland we should be doing it at a muc... | |
| 5 | 2017-05-22 19:28:01 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi kreuzschnabel,This looks very much like a mechanical edit. Have you ever actually visited e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2876566751/history to see if it deserves any sort of "place" tag?Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. | |
| 48836980 by Tim Hill | 1 | 2017-05-20 10:25:32 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM we map what exists in the real world, we do not map things as something it is not.I have reverted this edit. |
| 2 | 2017-05-20 12:10:36 UTC | Tim Hill | Hi trigpoint,I don't understand your comment.I can assure you it's a park area. I walk through it frequently. If it's the description/designation you disagree with e.g. open space then fair enough, but I don't understand why you have reverted the change. Could you explain further.Thank you,\... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-20 12:16:31 UTC | Tim Hill | Ah ok, I have seen a comment left on the note about this. I honestly don't know what the difference is between field / park in OSM. I'll check what the correct designation should be in the wiki and perhaps come back to you. It has benches, paths and the grass is maintained short, but i'll check.\... | |
| 48828100 by GenghisKhan Tzepos | 1 | 2017-05-20 09:01:51 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, thank you for this addition. You should add religion and denomination tags here.Maps.me is a bit basic, so probably wont allow you to do this, you should use a proper OSM editor such as iD from the OSM site. |
| 48731129 by Aleks-Berlin | 1 | 2017-05-18 12:39:41 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I think something has gone wrong with this series of edits. This is a pub beer garden, not a German style biergarten. According to the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=biergartenTo be clear, a biergarten is not the same as (what is known in the UK as) a "beer garde... |
| 2 | 2017-05-18 19:07:00 UTC | Aleks-Berlin | Hi Phil, it seems that this is a private tag by single users. on this planet are only 25 beer_garden, see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=beer_gardenAlso the OSM wiki tells both should be tagged as "biergarten" or pub (not beer_garden", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-18 19:18:58 UTC | Aleks-Berlin | After found a solution that is alligned with OSM wiki, I will change this. Please make a proposal. Thx, Alex | |
| 4 | 2017-05-19 16:27:18 UTC | trigpoint | Hi AlexThere is no such thing as a private tag, OSM allows a user to add any tag they wish. Those with a small number are unlikely to be rendered but a mapper is free to use any tags, this one is pretty well accepted in the area where it is used and describes a beer garden. Maybe the tagging can b... | |
| 5 | 2017-05-20 19:09:17 UTC | Aleks-Berlin | Hi trigpoint,I changed it back. I searched forway(user:"Aleks-Berlin")["amenity"="biergarten"]({{bbox}});bbox=over Bristisch Isles, no node or rela found.You can verify here.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48848464Many regards, Alex | |
| 6 | 2017-05-20 21:16:05 UTC | geow | Hi trigpoint, as a frequent visitor of "biergarten sensu stricto" aka Bavarian Biergarten I'm just curious - what are the characteristic features of a pub beer garden?Cheersgeow | |
| 7 | 2017-05-21 07:43:45 UTC | Aleks-Berlin | He said: read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=biergartenBut it is a philosophical question if the garden beside a pub (in UK beer_garden) is something else a german biergarten (which has typically a pub beside). The one is the garden of a pub, the other the garden with an attached ... | |
| 8 | 2017-05-21 09:18:47 UTC | geow | The wiki in this case is fairly clear. But some people, even in Bavaria ;) are not aware of the strict definition:Necessary characteristic of a "biergarten" is that you are allowed to bring your own food.That is why many so-tagged amenity=biergarten" even in Germany qualify only... | |
| 48810555 by J Joy | 1 | 2017-05-19 12:32:33 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Please remember that OSM is a public database and the name:xx tag should only be used for things that actually exist. It should not be used for personal markers or to record how much you paid for lunch.I am reverting this changeset. |
| 48765219 by ninjamask | 1 | 2017-05-17 17:32:16 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this is a big change and covers a large area. Please could you use meaningful changeset comments that tell other mappers what you were doing. Did you actually look at every one of the 11 pages of ways you have changed.I am sure that if as you say you were fixing josm, you would not have touch... |
| 2 | 2017-05-18 10:32:27 UTC | ninjamask | I meant, that I used the validator in JOSM to fix issues like double nodes and other auto-fixable issues. After that i fixed some issues of ways with double segments. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-20 23:07:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | Please don't use rely on the validator in JOSM without manually checking every change. The JOSM validator will get some things right, but it will get some edge cases wrong as well. | |
| 48724108 by Сергей Гвоздик | 1 | 2017-05-16 13:27:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your POI guest house is placed in the roadway. As such and without an address, name or other contact info it is of little or no use to anyone. Could you please rectify this if not the POI will be removed in due course. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-05-17 17:11:58 UTC | trigpoint | It translates as Oli's House, suggesting that this is yet another maps.me personal marker.I am reverting this rubbish | |
| 48658364 by gravify music | 1 | 2017-05-13 19:58:56 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. We do not map geocaches, it kind of defeats the object.I have reverted this. |
| 48574727 by Clickers1710 | 1 | 2017-05-10 22:41:52 UTC | trigpoint | This is a garden, it is not a park |
| 48560266 by Gwaelod | 1 | 2017-05-10 22:28:43 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the railway stations should be tagged as Borth, not Borth Station. You have also changed it to a station. Borth is a request stop, hence it was already correctly tagged as a halt. |
| 48557606 by Gwaelod | 1 | 2017-05-10 22:19:07 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, you seem to have removed the railway=rail tags from the Cambrian Line. I am fixing this. |
| 48555866 by Gwaelod | 1 | 2017-05-10 21:37:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, does this church really have a postcode?Any postcode is likely to be the vicarage, I doubt post is delivered to the church. |
| 48570568 by ARSENAL269 | 1 | 2017-05-10 20:36:15 UTC | trigpoint | This is not a park, reverted |
| 48570725 by ARSENAL269 | 1 | 2017-05-10 20:34:51 UTC | trigpoint | This is not a park, reverted |
| 48570872 by ARSENAL269 | 1 | 2017-05-10 20:34:14 UTC | trigpoint | This edit is unacceptable. Reverted |
| 48570922 by ARSENAL269 | 1 | 2017-05-10 20:34:07 UTC | trigpoint | This edit is unacceptable. Reverted |
| 48570850 by ARSENAL269 | 1 | 2017-05-10 20:33:57 UTC | trigpoint | This edit is unacceptable. Reverted |
| 48555310 by Gwaelod | 1 | 2017-05-10 20:09:56 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. The correct way to tag a school is on the area covering the grounds and just tag the building as building=school. The grounds here were already correctly tagged.As for language you should not put Welsh and English into the name tag. here I would use Welsh as the primary and use... |
| 48487340 by adventure1 | 1 | 2017-05-10 17:01:53 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please could you explain why you have removed the name from this school?Thanks Phil |
| 2 | 2017-05-10 18:48:32 UTC | adventure1 | Duplicated data cluttering map. There is a school pinpoint within the school grounds. This entry is the school grounds one.Many thanks for querying :) | |
| 3 | 2017-05-10 19:15:45 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the correct place to tag a school is on the grounds. Nodes are seen as a poor way to tag large areas. There was a successful project There was no additional node however, there was a bus stop, which you have added school tags to. I believe that both these changes should be reverted. Cheers P... | |
| 48564919 by RichRico | 1 | 2017-05-10 17:09:38 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please could you explain your reasons for deleting this churchyard? |
| 2 | 2017-05-10 21:46:02 UTC | RichRico | Hi trigpoint, I made a mistake deleting the churchyard, but I reversed the change.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406558653/history#map=19/52.48800/-4.04586thanks for your observation | |
| 48474127 by Thomas Bee | 1 | 2017-05-07 15:16:48 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please can you make your changeset comments meaningful. Describe what you are actually trying to achieve. This and many of your other changes are huge and covers a very large area.Thanks Phil |
| 48477017 by Eduardo Abella | 1 | 2017-05-07 14:59:05 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. There is no supermarket here. I have therefore removed it. |
| 2 | 2017-05-08 10:17:08 UTC | Chris Fleming | Thanks trigpoint - think this was probably a "duplicate" of the store next to the Last Drop. | |
| 48448046 by GenghisKhan Tzepos | 1 | 2017-05-06 18:22:32 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this should probably office=company, it certainly isn't a clinic |
| 48457176 by Alex-P | 1 | 2017-05-06 18:10:48 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please remember that that name tag should only be used for actual names, not descriptions. I an object doesn't have a name then the tag should be left blank. |
| 48455640 by Alex-P | 1 | 2017-05-06 18:10:31 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please remember that that name tag should only be used for actual names, not descriptions. I an object doesn't have a name then the tag should be left blank. |
| 48445782 by Alex-P | 1 | 2017-05-06 15:12:00 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this edit looks a little odd. Firstly is it a hotel or is it a holiday cottage? Also a name is meant to be a name and the tag should not be used for a description.What is the source of this edit? I am assuming you have not been there as it is not near a building. Is it verifiable? Does it have... |
| 48337343 by alterain | 1 | 2017-05-02 19:07:04 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, what is your reason and source for this change? Have you been there?The section you have tagged as a bridge is very definitely a causeway, and it is called simply Swarkestone Causeway.I will see what other local mappers view is, but mine is that this should be reverted.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-05-03 11:07:01 UTC | Mike Baggaley | I agree, although not local, I have been over it. My understanding is that there are sections that are bridges and sections that are causeway and that it is in total known as Swarkestone Bridge and Swarkstone Causeway - see https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1088337. It certa... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-03 16:47:06 UTC | trigpoint | I received a reply to this as a private message, for changeset discussions it is better to keep these discussion public where they can be seen by all mappers.The whole is known as Swarkestone Bridge by most people, but most don't consider the detail in the way that a mapper does. The actual brid... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-06 14:39:07 UTC | trigpoint | No response so am reverting it based on my local knowledge gathered over many years | |
| 47778714 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-05-06 14:37:14 UTC | trigpoint | Hi BernardNot sure if you looked through the history of this object but it was changed to a park, from a village green, by Doily17. I suspect this is pokemon related and should probably to put back?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-05-06 16:53:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Phil, I actually only adjusted the outline to better reflect what I saw on the Bing image regarding the street car parking. A well known web site shows the area looking much like a park. I've searched the web and find that Corner Pin is the old name for a much larger area to the south now buil... | |
| 48394534 by amar kadhim | 1 | 2017-05-04 13:48:20 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM, these are very odd places to buy fuel. What were you trying to achieve? |
| 2 | 2017-05-04 21:00:07 UTC | trigpoint | Fiction reverted | |
| 48031445 by DaveF | 1 | 2017-04-22 19:25:59 UTC | ndm | Dave, thde wiki says "Set a node Node or draw as an area Area along the building outline." -- I know that isn't how you map them in Bath, but that's how I've mapped the a lot of the ones in Bristol -- it would be good to keep this one consistent. |
| 2 | 2017-04-29 13:24:53 UTC | DaveF | I think the wiki page needs expanding. Similar to schools, Universities & hospitals, a boundary around all elements owned by the pub seems the more detailed/accurate way to map.I've posted to the tagging forum: "Mapping pubs as full areas"Mapping pubs as full areas | |
| 3 | 2017-04-29 16:04:48 UTC | trigpoint | The biergarten tag is a little out of place. I suspect it is a pub beer garden.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=biergarten?uselang=en | |
| 48248316 by Jparmar 7 | 1 | 2017-04-29 11:32:09 UTC | trigpoint | I am reverting these edits, they are very definitely recreation grounds |
| 48234563 by J Caruana | 1 | 2017-04-28 19:59:48 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. The Guards Museum is already mapped. I am removing this duplication |
| 48228126 by deathterrapin | 1 | 2017-04-28 13:22:12 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.I am always a bit concerned when a new mappers first edit is to just delete things.You have not explained what was wrong with the Health Centre but the building seems to match what is on bing imagery so maybe the tags should be changed but deleting the building is not the way ... |
| 2 | 2017-04-28 13:27:21 UTC | deathterrapin | The real health center is further down the road, and is marked correctly there. That building used to be the Rose Inn but is now just a house.The former Crossfield Tavern is also now just a house. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-28 13:28:52 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you for your relply, I will revert this change to put the buildings back and then correct the tagging. | |
| 4 | 2017-04-28 13:30:07 UTC | deathterrapin | Ah, I see, didn't realise I was deleting the whole buidling, sorry! | |
| 5 | 2017-04-28 13:31:51 UTC | trigpoint | I have put the buildings back, less pub and health centre tags | |
| 48228233 by Stephen Dench | 1 | 2017-04-28 13:23:35 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is this a verifable office with signs I would see if I walked down Adelphi Road? |
| 2 | 2017-04-28 15:20:13 UTC | Stephen Dench | This Business is registered to this address on pretty much every aggregator and directory online, including GMaps, Apple Maps, Bing maps etc.. And yes if you look outside of the front of the house you will see my sign "Web App Designer" | |
| 48057569 by gerv | 1 | 2017-04-24 19:24:40 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, SOFA should be mapped as shop=charity, charity=furniture. You will need to use a proper editor such as iD to change it though. Give me a shout if you need a hand. |
| 2 | 2017-04-25 06:53:02 UTC | gerv | Yep. Thanks for the tip. The software I was using is very convenient, but only has a limited number of presets. My plan was to come back and fix them in a few days. I'm fine with using iD. Thank you for the reminder :-) | |
| 48079366 by Jean Michel Paulin | 1 | 2017-04-24 19:19:45 UTC | trigpoint | Stirling Castle is already mapped in great detail, a node doesn't add anything so I am reverting this edit. |
| 48084079 by Dusty52 | 1 | 2017-04-24 11:45:59 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. I am not sure a community centre is really the way to describe a yacht club. Plus it is already mapped as.a marina. |
| 2 | 2017-04-24 21:48:55 UTC | Dusty52 | Thanks for this -If I could have found a "Marina" descriptor I would have used that! | |
| 3 | 2017-04-24 21:59:32 UTC | Dusty52 | Can't find how to correct this misleading information. Can someone advise? | |
| 48018758 by Genoma | 1 | 2017-04-22 16:59:58 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, thank you for adding the car park however you have made a common beginners mistake by putting a description in the name field. If the car park doesn't have a name, then leave the name field blank.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-04-23 11:20:41 UTC | Genoma | Thanks will change it :) | |
| 47981886 by wongataa | 1 | 2017-04-21 15:01:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Can you explain what you mean by "invalid layer tag"?Layer tags are relative, so "layer=-1" or "layer=-100" isn't any more valid or invalid than "layer=0" or an implied layer=0, if all crossing features have positive layer tags.What problem are you trying ... |
| 2 | 2017-04-22 07:45:23 UTC | wongataa | I should have put some more detail in. These layer tags were not used in conjunction with any other tags such as bridge or tunnel. The features in question could also be clearly seen at surface level on the satellite imagery and were tagged as layer -1. The layer tags were applied in error as the... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-22 08:43:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | Again, to be clear, _layer tags are relative_. Layer 0 does _not_ imply ground level.Again, what _actual problem_ are you trying to solve? | |
| 4 | 2017-04-22 16:30:10 UTC | trigpoint | There are more changes here than your stated incorrect layer.You have also changed oneway=-1 to oneway=yes on way 204098940 thus reversing the direction of travel for that section | |
| 47947482 by wongataa | 1 | 2017-04-21 14:32:59 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please can you point me to where this mechanical edit was discussed?You seem to have mechanically armchaired layer=1 onto bridges with no survey, if you had you would have seen that the bridge should be at layer=0 and maybe whatever is below them needs a later=-1 where it is below ground level... |
| 2 | 2017-04-22 07:51:54 UTC | wongataa | All bridges need a layer tag of 1 or higher. This is detailed in the OSM wiki on the bridge page. It doesn't matter if the bridge is a simple plank or not. It is above ground level.In that mapillary link the bridge needs a layer tag as it crosses a river/canal. The layer is to show where a f... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-22 08:38:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Firstly - please take the wiki with a bucketload of salt :)Secondly - layer=0 doesn't imply ground level - layer tags are relative, so "All bridges need a layer tag of 1 or higher" is simply wrong. Also, although it is possible to infer relative level from imagery and other sources, i... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-29 17:50:29 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48258464 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical changes to layers. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1325 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=133272 | |
| 47844875 by Mardy Mark | 1 | 2017-04-20 18:25:11 UTC | trigpoint | Its a recreation ground, reverted |
| 47844669 by Mardy Mark | 1 | 2017-04-20 18:24:17 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted, not a park |
| 47844839 by Mardy Mark | 1 | 2017-04-20 18:23:33 UTC | trigpoint | It is in a park, but this is a football pitch. Reverted |
| 47950853 by PbfootBully | 1 | 2017-04-20 18:10:26 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please could you add some more detail to the artworks. A pub car park is an odd place for an artwork.Thanks Phil |
| 2 | 2017-04-28 09:06:43 UTC | Derby45 | Phil, I think this person is just messing about. There are a few changes by this person in the area. I have just cleaned up a set of paths that have been dragged all over the place in this users changeset, also with Artwork randomly placed that doesn't exist. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-03 12:39:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've never been to that pub but I've commneted on another one that I don't think exists: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47950670 . | |
| 4 | 2017-05-05 09:30:50 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48420321 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Pokemon-inspired edits and other fiction. Attempts to contact the mapper have failed. | |
| 47965805 by Genoma | 1 | 2017-04-20 17:59:36 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188281048 does not need to be mapped as a tunnel. The road is already mapped as a bridge. |
| 2 | 2017-04-20 18:01:31 UTC | Genoma | good point thanks I'll change it | |
| 47976840 by samely | 1 | 2017-04-20 16:32:55 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, thank you for your contribution however there are a few issues with this edit.1. You have not tagged it as junction=roundabout.2. A roundabout normally takes the highest classification, so this one should be primary. Exceptions are when there are motorways involved but that doesn't apply h... |
| 2 | 2017-04-20 17:03:45 UTC | samely | Thanks Phil! I've already added these details. | |
| 47911091 by mountainfella | 1 | 2017-04-18 16:21:09 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. We do not map Airbnbs as they are not verifiable.I have reverted this edit. |
| 47871125 by MichaelWalls | 1 | 2017-04-17 14:30:03 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank yo for your contribution however it is looking a bit odd.I assume that the Blockbuster shop has become a solicitors but is still tagged as shop=video.Maps.me is a bit basic and doesn't allow even simple things like changing the category, in order to do this you will nee... |
| 47865027 by Kritesh16 | 1 | 2017-04-17 10:12:47 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Redwell Leisure Centre is already mapped, it is not a park so I am reverting this pointless addition |
| 47840984 by lllliiiiiiiiiiii | 1 | 2017-04-16 15:37:00 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSM Fairfield Recreation Ground is not a park it is a recreation ground - the clue is in the name. I have removed the extra park you added and altered the existing rec's name |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 15:38:12 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted duplicattion | |
| 47820062 by ehm1806 | 1 | 2017-04-15 17:54:22 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, you seem to have made a lot of these edits. What is the source of the opening hours you are adding? They are very spread out so I doubt you have visited them all. |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 12:00:50 UTC | ehm1806 | Hi, The source is the official supermarket websites as well as local knowledge. I do travel around! I see there is a place to put source in. I will do that. Thanks for the reminder | |
| 3 | 2017-04-16 12:20:55 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you, however have you obtained explicit permission to copy from these websites? | |
| 47822661 by tefalphanine | 1 | 2017-04-16 08:30:53 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this edit looks very odd. Bare rock is kind of unusual in Leicester. I think the original paved is a better description. |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 08:46:00 UTC | trigpoint | Fiction reverted | |
| 47822765 by tefalphanine | 1 | 2017-04-16 08:31:44 UTC | trigpoint | Again wetland along the new cut, I don't think so |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 08:45:17 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted | |
| 47822785 by tefalphanine | 1 | 2017-04-16 08:44:42 UTC | trigpoint | You are wrong here, the node is the Bede Island area of Leicester. The park is already mapped as an area.Reverted |
| 47822927 by tefalphanine | 1 | 2017-04-16 08:36:20 UTC | trigpoint | This is fiction, reverted |
| 47762476 by Martin Wynne | 1 | 2017-04-15 14:32:56 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi Martin, please do not add names that are descriptive, e.g. Playground - we already know it is a playground from its tag.Thanks,Mike |
| 2 | 2017-04-15 14:54:44 UTC | Martin Wynne | Hi Mike,But map users don't know it's a Playground unless I give it a name. I know there are some tiny little squiggly icons, but they are too small for someone of my age to see properly or understand what they mean. Also they vanish at some zoom levels. Most things have a name used by local resid... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-15 15:04:03 UTC | Mike Baggaley | You should not add incorrect data just so because something is not visible at a different zoom level. If the icons are too small for you to see, then please set the zoom level on your browser to display larger (I don't mean zoom in on the map). In addition to an icon, playgrounds are clearly display... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-15 15:19:49 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Martin, also remember that OSM is a geographical database. The map you see on the OSM site is just one, of many renders that are available and anyone is free to create their own if what they require something different. | |
| 5 | 2017-04-15 15:26:03 UTC | Martin Wynne | Hi Mike,But how do map users know what the colours mean? I clicked on the Map Key and a Playground isn't listed.When I zoom the browser some icons vanish. Also the map gets very fuzzy. I can't seem to attach a screenshot here, so here's a link:http://85a.co.uk/forum/gallery/2/2_151117_37000000... | |
| 6 | 2017-04-15 15:29:16 UTC | trigpoint | Icons are displayed at different zoom levels, I cannot tell what zoom level that image was, but the playground icon (in mapnik) displays starting at z17. | |
| 7 | 2017-04-15 15:40:56 UTC | Martin Wynne | Hi, I was zooming the browser (Firefox) as suggested by Mike, not zooming levels in OSM. At some browser zoom settings the icons vanish, and reappear at both higher and lower settings (which doesn't make sense to me).cheers,Martin. | |
| 8 | 2017-04-15 15:44:35 UTC | trigpoint | Use the + - zoom buttons, or simply the scroll wheel if you have a mouse.But do remember that OSM is a database and mapping should not be dictated by a single renderer. | |
| 9 | 2017-04-15 16:03:48 UTC | Martin Wynne | Hi, Yes that's what I'm doing, using the mouse wheel. I have added a lot more detail to the Cemetery. Cheers, Martin. | |
| 10 | 2017-04-15 17:28:33 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Regarding items and/or icons seeming to vanish at different zoom levels, you may not be aware that each zoom level is generated separately over a period of time, so after you add something, a few hours later you may see it at one zoom level, but it may not have yet made it into the others. I usually... | |
| 47765086 by Martin Wynne | 1 | 2017-04-15 15:21:41 UTC | trigpoint | Does this cemetery have a name? It is unlikely to be just Cemetery. |
| 2 | 2017-04-15 15:36:14 UTC | Martin Wynne | Hi, Thanks for your message. Part of the cemetery is St Michael's Churchyard. The old sign on the other part is "Stourport Urban District Council Cemetery". That council ceased to exist in 1974, it is now run by Stourport Town Council. Local people just call it "The Cemetery". I ... | |
| 47793584 by sleepingwolf | 1 | 2017-04-15 12:42:34 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for you contribution however there are a few issues.Is there any evidence the names Berwick Grange and Sundorne Grove actually exist beyond marketing and estate agent speak. I have never seen, or heard, those names. Also please try to work with existing objects rather... |
| 2 | 2017-04-17 12:33:14 UTC | sleepingwolf | Hi PhilThanks for your comments, my apologies I hadn't realised I had deleted grassed areas, I'll replace them and bare in mind for the future about editing existing objects instead of replacing. I'll amend the school names too.In terms of the estate names they are very much used locally in thos... | |
| 47788394 by Silverhaze442 | 1 | 2017-04-14 17:57:35 UTC | trigpoint | The correct way to describe this is amenity=playground. |
| 47639516 by edol | 1 | 2017-04-11 16:22:10 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this looks a very odd edit. Please can you explain? |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 17:09:49 UTC | trigpoint | No response and very unlikely to be verifiable so reverted | |
| 47738616 by Martin Wynne | 1 | 2017-04-14 14:01:43 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, you seem to have deleted the Kidderminster Pay Scale area, why? |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 14:31:15 UTC | Martin Wynne | Hi,Sorry, I'm new to all this. I'm not aware of deleting the Kidderminster Pay Scale area? I have no knowledge of what that is, and Google doesn't seem to know either.If I deleted it, it was not intentional. As far as I know I have only ever deleted things which I have added myself, and thin... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-14 15:34:13 UTC | trigpoint | Hi MartinIt is the area for which a plus bus ticket is valid. I will put it back if it was accidental.Cheers Phil | |
| 4 | 2017-04-14 15:50:21 UTC | Martin Wynne | Hi Phil, Thanks. I understand now.p.s. PlusBus is one word with camel case or all-caps, see http://www.plusbus.infocheers,Martin. | |
| 47783006 by NM1305 | 1 | 2017-04-14 15:06:38 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.I have disconnected the park boundary from the centreline of the road and also converted the parts to a multipolygon. |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 15:08:02 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detailWhen you are adding an area please don't join it up to a road. The line that marks the road is the centreline so there will always be a gap. | |
| 47780920 by Starbukc | 1 | 2017-04-14 13:56:10 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a park over the top of all the existing stuff. This is clearly a doodle and I will revert (undo) it. |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 13:57:58 UTC | trigpoint | Duplicate reverted | |
| 47776942 by Will7 | 1 | 2017-04-14 13:38:45 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.Sidewalks should only be drawn as separate ways if there is a physical separation. Then you need to make sure you make all connections, otherwise you will cause some very silly routing, The normal way to add sidewalks is to tag the road, sidewalk=both|left|right. |
| 47755922 by rgt | 1 | 2017-04-14 12:55:31 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, these are definitley areas of grass, certainly not parks so I have reverted this change. |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 17:39:09 UTC | rgt | my mistake, thought it was park of the park upriver, thanks for the change | |
| 47710321 by dothelalalalala | 1 | 2017-04-13 11:53:41 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.Deleting paths because they are private is the wrong way to go about things, they are a feature on the ground and should stay in OSM. If they are private they should be tagged access/foot/bicycle=private.OS maps are copyright and should not be used even to check something. Use... |
| 2 | 2017-04-13 15:24:11 UTC | dothelalalalala | HiThankyou for the feedback, I havent edited before.The paths I removed have been ploughed over since access was retracted, so they dont exist now. Ill be sure not to mention OS maps in future and rest assured anything I add or change is based on first hand observation.Re access rights, I fo... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-13 17:33:00 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you for the explanation, it is fine,Keep up the good work. | |
| 47618640 by Aerindyr | 1 | 2017-04-10 11:54:27 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I think this has gone a little wrong. What you have tagged as a private park is actually a garden. I have removed this error |
| 47596000 by Newton Grove | 1 | 2017-04-09 15:50:33 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. I think this edit has gone a little wrong, you seem to have added a caravan site which should be tagged as tourism=caravan_site but you have probably pressed a wrong key and tagged it as a park. Please can you correct it? |
| 2 | 2017-04-09 17:20:37 UTC | Newton Grove | Hi TrigpointThanks for comment would love to correct it. Using ID browser editor I can not see how to tag it as tourism=caravan_site | |
| 3 | 2017-04-09 17:24:46 UTC | Newton Grove | TrigpointI think I have got it typed into "search". Now updated | |
| 4 | 2017-04-09 22:11:03 UTC | trigpoint | That looks good, thank you | |
| 47594619 by Helen Pincher | 1 | 2017-04-09 16:04:53 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, we do not map airbnbs in osm. I am reverting this edit. It is also unlikely to be in the middle of the road. |
| 47595674 by abc26324 | 1 | 2017-04-09 15:56:04 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the correct way to map aavement which is attached to a road is by the tag sidewalk=left|right|both. They should not be mapped as separate ways unless there is a physical separation. Mapping as you are doing breaks rendering and spoils OSM for its users. Highway=pedestrian is intended to be used ... |
| 47594447 by Helen Pincher | 1 | 2017-04-09 15:46:04 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the YHA in Earls Court is already mapped. I am therefor removing your duplication.I also doubt that Casa de Ania is in the middle of the road. |
| 47586108 by rhh23 | 1 | 2017-04-09 08:54:43 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution however there are a couple of issues.It is still a building, area=yes on its own does nothing and is not needed on a building.In order to render it needs a tag, rather than remove the shop tag it should be changed to shop=charity, if you want t... |
| 47570276 by OliviaFowler | 1 | 2017-04-08 15:29:58 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your addition however it looks like it should be a recreation ground rather than a park. |
| 47557198 by MalingaGIS | 1 | 2017-04-08 11:36:41 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, mae hyn yn ddefnydd rhyfedd iawn o'r briffordd = preswyl. Fel arfer, ffyrdd sy'n arwain at ffermydd yn cael eu mapio fel naill ai annosbarthedig neu wasanaeth yn dibynnu ar amodau'r mynediad.Hefyd dylai'r sylwadau changeset fod mewn iaith glir fel y gall mappers eraill yn deall, yna yn hytrach... |
| 2 | 2017-04-08 14:51:24 UTC | MalingaGIS | Hi, trigpoint. Thank you very much for the correction. I update these as highway=service, it seems those are farms. I thought it was residential. Will included the meaning full comments. Thanks again. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-08 15:14:41 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you for making the corrections, however your changeset comment is still hashtaged, hashtags belong on twitter, not in OSM, thanks. | |
| 47567572 by Toong | 1 | 2017-04-08 13:23:51 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution however the tagging appears to have gone a little wrong, it is easy for newcomers to make these mistakes.You have said you have mapped a wood, and I can see a wood exists however you have mistakenly tagged it as a park. Would you correct that? Al... |
| 47520174 by p3et | 1 | 2017-04-06 23:00:27 UTC | ndm | Is this copied from the website -- they have a "warning" notice:"This entire site © BM Services and UKMotorhomes.net. If you wish to reproduce any information published here, including copying to online discussion groups or forums, please make a request via our contact form. ... |
| 2 | 2017-04-08 10:00:08 UTC | p3et | Thanks for the hint. I'll ask them for permission. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-08 12:56:07 UTC | trigpoint | The mapping of these also feels wrong. They seem to be existing car parks, so the tag should (if allowed, although there is a pretty big notice saying it must not be copied) be added a tags to the existing objects. However the site uses google maps which makes the data incompatible with OSM even if ... | |
| 47555258 by Teaandkale | 1 | 2017-04-08 11:14:48 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I know the tagging here was inconsistent. But this section was probably right.Kingsland Bridge and the associated roads are privately owned and not PROW hence access=permissive was correct. |
| 47554569 by Teaandkale | 1 | 2017-04-08 11:00:41 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, should footway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485430915 not connect to Bynner Street, rather than the Prince of Wales car park, it should also connect to the service road (probably needs parking_aisle too). I did spot some sort of path there yesterday after a couple of Threads to get a chines... |
| 47544783 by Carselu Lutete | 1 | 2017-04-07 16:26:00 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Does this guest house have a name. It is very unusual for a business not to, also does it have a phone number/website? |
| 2 | 2017-04-08 10:29:10 UTC | trigpoint | No response so reverting | |
| 47542450 by Itay Greenspon | 1 | 2017-04-07 16:23:21 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. What is the actual source of these edits? The document you quote does not have specific permission for use. |
| 2 | 2017-04-07 22:36:51 UTC | Itay Greenspon | Hi, I'm a resident of this community and am using my local knowledge of the area. The document is an accurate reflection of the actual layout. | |
| 47533284 by ti-lo | 1 | 2017-04-07 12:24:30 UTC | trigpoint | Does this shop still exist?The domain is for sale. |
| 2 | 2017-04-07 13:52:44 UTC | ti-lo | I can't check it personally. Left a "fixme" entry. In case you can check it directly, you may certainly edit it. | |
| 47465824 by Jan Macaj | 1 | 2017-04-07 11:54:37 UTC | Robert Whittaker | In this changeset, you've created a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4776270621 with an address, but tagged it as a bank/building society. Abbey Street appears to be a residential street, so are you sure this is correct? |
| 2 | 2017-04-07 12:20:11 UTC | trigpoint | Hi RobertI have already removed a similar node by this user from this location. The name 'Home' gives it away as a personal marker by a maps.me user.This one should also be removed.Cheers Phil | |
| 47514239 by wir3d123 | 1 | 2017-04-06 17:00:48 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. The correct way to tag a field where sheep graze is landuse=farmland, although farmland is normally left blank.For some reason you have made a mistake and tagged it as water, wont the sheep drown? |
| 2 | 2017-04-06 17:24:52 UTC | wir3d123 | Appreciate the advice. New to this as you can probably tell... I think i have corrected this now. Please tell me if i need to change it again. | |
| 47489044 by Pillock | 1 | 2017-04-05 20:44:39 UTC | Pillock | Wrong description.Changed carpark to two seperate areas as you cannot drive from the Public carpark (south west) to the Red Lion Carpark (north east) and they have separate entrances. |
| 2 | 2017-04-06 16:55:23 UTC | trigpoint | Can you walk between the two, or is there some sort of barrier? | |
| 3 | 2017-04-07 11:24:44 UTC | Pillock | You can walk through a gap in the fence but not drive. The red lion carpark is customers only so should be separate. | |
| 47478037 by bttyA | 1 | 2017-04-06 10:06:43 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi, is foot allowed as well? Perhaps access=no could be removed?Cheers, Mike |
| 2 | 2017-04-06 16:53:56 UTC | trigpoint | As it is designated as a public_bridleway foot is very defiintely allowed, as are horses and bikes. The bicycle=yes tag is therefore pointless and adds tag clutter. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-03 10:13:56 UTC | jogger333 | Dear Mike, Looking at the wiki, one should indeed make the usage clear with appropriate access tagging:"Also taginfo shows a significant number of uses of:designation=permissive_footpathdesignation=permissive_bridlewayThese tags should be used in combination with an appropriate highwa... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-03 10:45:54 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi Jogger333 , No I think the tagging was was incorrect (the original done by Russ McD). The update by bttyA was what brought it to light. The designation=public_bridleway would set the default access of foot, bicycle and horse=yes, however, access=no would override this and set them all to no. This... | |
| 5 | 2017-05-03 11:13:59 UTC | jogger333 | Hey mike, thanks for the explanation! I was looking for a reference of your statement "The designation=public_bridleway would set the default access of foot, bicycle and horse=yes" but I couldn't find it in the wiki, I really would like to implement it correctly in our routing, Can you giv... | |
| 6 | 2017-05-03 19:05:47 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Unfortunately, I can't find a reference any more - the pages on access and UK mapping guidelines appear to have been changed towards the end of last year with the meaning of designated being changed. Bizarrely, the access=designated page now says the value is deprecated without saying what replaces ... | |
| 7 | 2017-05-04 07:42:55 UTC | jogger333 | Oh yes, the information is really vague. This will make it a bit difficult to conclude routing rules from it that are correct worldwide, not only in UK.Let's see if that is possible and if there are any conflicts popping up.Thanks for your summary, this helped me a lot to understand the issue he... | |
| 47512158 by Arrow Cars UK | 1 | 2017-04-06 16:46:11 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, what is the source of this edit?You have removed footpath L57 and the airport trail for example. L57 is a PROW and cannot simply be closed, it will at most have been diverted. Do you have any reference to this? |
| 2 | 2017-04-06 17:29:39 UTC | Arrow Cars UK | Hi,Sorry, I should have referenced such a significant change like this. All the site plans and access arrangements are available here:http://www.eastmidlandsgateway.co.uk/community/phasing.phpThe public right of way info is here:https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-con... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-06 21:55:02 UTC | will_p | Hi Luke,I haven't looked what's happening on the ground here for a couple of months, but I'm a bit surprised that all these features have already been cleared. Have you actually confirmed that they have all gone? For example, you have removed a service road all the way from Church Street, Lockingt... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-07 08:34:26 UTC | Arrow Cars UK | Morning Will,The features I've removed have all gone this week. The construction area I've added is the full area where ground work has started. (Obviously it's impossible to get GPS tracks at the moment as there is no access). The roads which are closed, such as the junction with Ashby Road and... | |
| 5 | 2017-04-08 21:38:45 UTC | will_p | Today I have had a look at the current situation. It turns out that many of the deleted features do still exist:The Airport Trail is still there and is still open to the public with minor diversions.The service road from Church Lane (Lockington) is still there. It's being used as one of the main... | |
| 47510243 by And Albert Fair Trading Ltd | 1 | 2017-04-06 15:09:22 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have placed a point right over the top of a cafe (Cafe Nero) . Has this business replaced Cafe Nero? Is it sharing the building? The point you have added doesn't describe what it is. You have given lots of details, but no shop tag or office tag to describe what category the b... |
| 2 | 2017-04-06 15:17:00 UTC | And Albert Fair Trading Ltd | How do we make the point SHOP? This isn't clear at all. We are actually a shop on the upper tier of Chester's Rows ABOVE cafe Nero. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-06 15:22:41 UTC | chillly | I have added shop=yes tag. If there is a better shop description you can change it later. Now it has a shop tag it is easier to change it. Adding a shop above another is a problem. I suggest staggering the two points a little, maybe to reflect the relative entrances to the two premises. If your ... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-06 15:44:43 UTC | And Albert Fair Trading Ltd | OK, Thank you.I find this site awfully confusing to navigate and add the correct information. Well as long as people can find us that's all we want really. Thank s again | |
| 5 | 2017-04-06 15:46:00 UTC | And Albert Fair Trading Ltd | I can't see the tag point to change it? | |
| 6 | 2017-04-06 16:13:24 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, also spotted that you have used=ele=1, that means 1m above sealevel. The correct tag is layer=1, as already used on Eastgate Street North. | |
| 47483943 by ggeorgea | 1 | 2017-04-05 18:07:36 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSMThank you for your addition but please remember that changeset comments are intended to inform other mappers of your intent and should be in plain language.Meaningless hashtag comments fail to do that, please do not use them in OSM. |
| 47475017 by andrewsh | 1 | 2017-04-05 12:48:46 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, is this a real business that customers can visit?I was about to ask, the website looks like it is contact by web or phone only so should not be in OSM.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-04-05 12:53:11 UTC | andrewsh | No idea, I just added the correct tag. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-05 12:53:50 UTC | andrewsh | Hmm, the website says they're in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire:4 – 12 Kempson CloseGatehouse Way Industrial Estate | |
| 4 | 2017-04-05 12:54:56 UTC | andrewsh | I will probably remove them. Thanks for paying attention. It looked like a legitimate business to me… which it probably isn't. Well, not in Oxford, at least. | |
| 5 | 2017-04-05 12:59:01 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you.It looked like spam, both the username and long description. | |
| 6 | 2017-04-05 13:00:46 UTC | andrewsh | Well, these two looked like spam, but the website looked okay-ish to me. I should have checked the address :) | |
| 47451235 by Iwona Kaminska | 1 | 2017-04-04 18:50:56 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have tagged something as a village (place=village) but you have called it Llanddew church. Is it a church or the place? I think the place is called Llanddew. If it is a church, is this different from the Church of St David which is already in place? If so, you need to add a... |
| 2 | 2017-04-04 21:53:04 UTC | trigpoint | The village was already mapped as Llanddew, which was correct according to OS OpenData, my view is that this maps.me edit is probably a personal marker should be reverted, it altered an existing object. | |
| 47419181 by scott_damien | 1 | 2017-04-04 17:42:49 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, postboxes do not normally have names, they have a reference number which is already mapped. The name you have added is just a description so I removed the name. |
| 17361001 by apsales | 1 | 2017-04-03 18:17:59 UTC | trigpoint | Hello, is there any reason you have changed these halts to stations?When I last caught a train to Llandecwyn I had to ask the guard to stop, which makes it a halt. |
| 47318879 by upendrakarukonda | 1 | 2017-04-01 17:55:14 UTC | trigpoint | S’il vous plaît pourriez-vous expliquer la raison de ce changement ? Vous avez enlevé l’étiquette d’agrément, supprimé le nom : es et changé le nom de tag du Centre vers les Centres.Please could you explain the reason for this change? Yo... |
| 2 | 2017-04-05 09:54:16 UTC | upendrakarukonda | Hi trigpoint,Thank you for noticing this. I reverted back my changeset. This must be accidental. I am not aware of this deletions at all. Regads,Upendra. | |
| 47357657 by upendrakarukonda | 1 | 2017-04-01 17:09:55 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, are you really sure this postbox exists?It was created by a maps.me user and the odd tags make it look like some sort of personal marker or misuse of a tag.The rubbish tags are likely to indicate to a local mapper that a survey is needed and by cleaning the apparant rubbish you have left a c... |
| 2 | 2017-04-01 17:30:31 UTC | upendrakarukonda | Hello Trigpoint,I deleted the tags which are not correct. I added a note in that place for confirmation of existence of post box in that place. Regards,Upendra | |
| 3 | 2017-04-01 17:42:50 UTC | trigpoint | A quick search reveals that Abras is some sort of Brasilian organisation at the address given. It looks like typical mistagging by a maps.me user. | |
| 47320307 by upendrakarukonda | 1 | 2017-04-01 17:13:36 UTC | trigpoint | Is there a reason you have changed these tags, what survey did you carry out? |
| 47220858 by sharync | 1 | 2017-03-28 07:46:16 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, is this name correct?Creek is an American word, and not used in terms of UK geography. |
| 2 | 2017-03-28 07:59:23 UTC | sharync | Yep it's the correct name. http://www.scottishpower.com/pages/damhead_creek_power_station.aspx | |
| 3 | 2017-03-28 08:04:54 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you, was just checking as it looked an odd name in the UK.Cheers Phil | |
| 47220241 by 24*7Taxisweybridge | 1 | 2017-03-28 07:31:22 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.According to the address you have given you business is on Queens Road, yet for some strange reason you have added it in the middle of Morrisons.I have reverted this as it is clearly the wrong place, assuming you have an actual office that customers can visit you can add that ... |
| 2 | 2017-03-28 07:35:10 UTC | trigpoint | Just realised that you have not simply created a spam node in the wrong place, but had deleted information from the Weybridge place node, that is considered vandalism. | |
| 47204884 by Rahela08 | 1 | 2017-03-27 18:24:03 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.It always make me nervous when I see a new mappers first edit is just deleting the work of other mappers. I have reverted this edit, but please can you explain what you were trying to achieve? |
| 47075722 by Polarbear-repair | 1 | 2017-03-23 13:25:59 UTC | trigpoint | Big question, why? What is the problem you are fix? Does it need fixing?In the case of these roundabouts, they are a single way so I would question why they are relations in the first place. But once the roundabout is split for route relations then having the name on the relation makes.perfect sen... |
| 2 | 2017-03-23 14:00:13 UTC | Polarbear | I was analysing the usage of jct=roundabout on relations for a wiki discussion, please find the results here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#On_a_relationtype=junction (here) is only a proposal and ignored by prominent data consumers. Also, I find type=route i... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-23 14:08:01 UTC | SK53 | I very much doubt that the road name on these roundabouts is actually XXX roundabout, it is more likely to be the name of one of the roads (as for instance the junction of Donnington Wood Way with Celandine Road). It is the junction which carries the name not the road segments which form the junctio... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-23 23:32:56 UTC | Polarbear | Is there any evidence that supports the assumption that the road forming a roundabout does not carry the name of the roundabout? Is there a streetsign posted along the loop carrying the road name and not the roundabout name? I only know cases where the roundabout name is posted. | |
| 47066126 by jesus_army | 1 | 2017-03-22 18:22:26 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, you seem to be using a strange imagery URL. What were you copying and do wehave explicit permission to use that imformation? |
| 2 | 2017-03-22 21:04:51 UTC | jesus_army | Information came from a GPX trace rather than the map tile but I will remove that way and re-edit for clarity | |
| 47052270 by homemademan | 1 | 2017-03-21 22:00:07 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.In OSM we map what exists on the ground, you have for some bizarre reason changed the Chertsey town node to a hospital. This sort of edit breaks the map for other users and will be reverted. |
| 2 | 2017-03-21 22:44:39 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted | |
| 47052513 by homemademan | 1 | 2017-03-21 22:03:44 UTC | trigpoint | The hosital is already mapped, for some reason you have created a duplicate node. |
| 47034486 by kyle_pearson97 | 1 | 2017-03-21 18:33:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. You seem to have changed a place node to a park, the park is already mapped and the name you added looks very unlikely. I have put this back to the place node |
| 47007752 by Cebderby | 1 | 2017-03-20 17:55:23 UTC | trigpoint | HI, I am not convinced there is a legal no-U turn restriction here. I have never seen any signage and if there was one, how would I get into Knighton Junction Lane or the New Road Inn?However I have spotted that Welford Road is incorrectly mapped as a single carriageway so I will fix that.Cheers... |
| 2 | 2017-03-20 18:36:47 UTC | Cebderby | Hi, If turning right from the southbound Welford Rd into Knighton Jnct Ln or the pub is ok then this new turn restriction can't remain. The specific routing problem was in (expecting to) turn right from Victoria Park Rd to northbound Welford Rd - OsmAnd app's router gives left turn then U-turn whic... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-20 21:45:59 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I have looked at this on OSMand and it has got a very serious routing issue. Both OSRM and mapzen work perfectly here.Maybe it should be reported to OSMand? | |
| 4 | 2017-03-20 22:04:31 UTC | Cebderby | I suspect it is over-penalising a route from a secondary to a primary road via a minor way, even though it seems short and obvious. Trying with 'fuel efficient' route option (ie. short route) OsmAnd gets the right turn, it's only the 'fastest' route with the problem. For now, I've removed the no-U... | |
| 5 | 2017-03-20 22:36:51 UTC | trigpoint | I agree the cross ways should be secondary, and I would consider Putney Road/Commercial Square to be tertiary. But a router should cope with the mapping as is, classifications are an indication of importance rather than speed, especially when they are tagged as 30 mph.I am working through Mapill... | |
| 46999015 by webwiki | 1 | 2017-03-20 19:22:10 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.It looks like you were adding a hedge. They are tagged as barrier=hedge.Give me a shout if you need any help. |
| 46982421 by Stan W | 1 | 2017-03-19 16:48:16 UTC | will_p | Hi, what does 'RA surveys' mean? The abbreviation isn't clear to me.Thanks. |
| 2 | 2017-03-20 17:41:47 UTC | trigpoint | My guess, and knowing Stan as I do. it would be Ramblers Association | |
| 46986811 by sam kenney | 1 | 2017-03-19 16:25:44 UTC | trigpoint | Has the building been demolished? |
| 2 | 2017-03-19 16:42:40 UTC | sam kenney | Yes and has been replaced by fuel station | |
| 46985260 by delfimo | 1 | 2017-03-19 15:25:56 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMI see you have added Humbleton Farm, which is great. We outline the farmyard, as best we can, and ass landuse=farmyard, not place=farm. That will make it consistent with most farms in the UK on OSM |
| 2 | 2017-03-19 15:30:25 UTC | trigpoint | You have also joined it to a powerline, which is obviously incorrect and to the centreline of Mill Lane. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-19 15:37:55 UTC | delfimo | Apologies. Have sorted now. Deleted old area as unable to figure out how to change area. | |
| 46920511 by Shires999 | 1 | 2017-03-18 10:09:14 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the name tag should only be used for an actual name, not just to add additional information. The correct way to indicate that a car park is private is to use an access tag, in this case access=private. Not sure if maps.me can fix this, you may need to login to osm.org and use a proper editor suc... |
| 46863433 by RaduTothazan | 1 | 2017-03-15 12:32:57 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.Thank you for edit, however according to the osm wiki smoking=no should not be used if it is the law, as it is in this case.You seem to be using an app called SpotOn, please could you provide a URL for it?Cheers Phil |
| 46842212 by Mike Geo | 1 | 2017-03-14 19:50:59 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Mike, just checking that you have surveyed this path recently. The area is being developed so just checking.Cheers Phil |
| 46761728 by Dyserth | 1 | 2017-03-11 15:18:09 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, what is the source of this information?I have never seen any evidence for the existence of a Roman Road and find it highly unlikely that it followed the modern alignment of the A49 between Weston and Prees.Also this type of information is more appropriate in OpenHistoricalMap rather then OSM... |
| 2 | 2017-03-12 09:35:51 UTC | trigpoint | The North Shropshire section appears to be pure fiction, the Roman Road is only shown on your claimed source in very short sections. Where did the rest come from?It is very unlikely that the Roman road followed the present roads through Shawbury.I do not have a usable source but I do know it did... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-12 14:36:43 UTC | Dyserth | Hi. Please see area around SJ55471 24483. Marked as Roman Road (Course of) on OS Map, northern section curves to the west near Moston Grange and follows the alignment of the unclassified road heading towards the A49 where it passes through the modern cutting. This has been constructed at a natural... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-12 15:16:56 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you for these updates, it does seem much more believable and there are references to the Roman Road on OS Opendata. I would suggest that the route was not through Prees village but followed a straight line from the present junction with the B5065 via Prees Church which forms a straight line ... | |
| 5 | 2017-03-12 15:29:38 UTC | trigpoint | I should probably add that is is likely that the course of the road drifted over time and that up until WW2 this section of the A49 was a minor road which was upgraded as a bypass. | |
| 46781382 by Bart Niesten | 1 | 2017-03-12 14:06:07 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I'm not sure what this shop is. But it is certainly not a department store. Please do not mistag. |
| 46774911 by cal23 | 1 | 2017-03-12 13:05:42 UTC | trigpoint | Fiction reverted |
| 46774915 by cal23 | 1 | 2017-03-12 13:03:21 UTC | trigpoint | The middle of a residential road is a very unlikely place for a viewpoint, I am reverting this edit. |
| 46783851 by Alan Bluck | 1 | 2017-03-12 12:56:05 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.Cherry Hinton Campsite is already mapped, so I am removing your duplication. |
| 46740571 by Glucosamine | 1 | 2017-03-10 17:34:44 UTC | trigpoint | Wow, the A14 is being extended to North Wales? |
| 2 | 2017-03-10 18:54:00 UTC | Glucosamine | Ooops - one of those change set titles which gets copied from one set of updates to quite another - mea culpa for not checking. Any ideas on how to change a change set title? On the other hand, with a £1.3B budget, the A14 really ought to reach the border ... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-10 18:56:53 UTC | trigpoint | Don't worry about changing the existing ones, not sure if that is even possible. I was just jokingly making you aware so you would fix it next time you edit. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-10 19:27:12 UTC | Glucosamine | Taken in the spirit intended. Not the first time this has caught me out when using a specific title when I normally use a generic - will try to remember to check for at least the immediate future - though I'm sure I'll slip up again at some point. | |
| 40145804 by Hpriem | 1 | 2017-03-10 15:20:56 UTC | trigpoint | Airbnbs are private homes and do not belong in OSM, I have reverted this |
| 2 | 2017-03-10 15:25:05 UTC | Hpriem | Good...thank you | |
| 46737943 by Marianaolivo35 | 1 | 2017-03-10 14:45:24 UTC | BCNorwich | Are you sure that is a hotel, or is it just a room rental?? |
| 2 | 2017-03-10 15:13:39 UTC | trigpoint | Airbnb are private homes and have no place in OSM, I am reverting this | |
| 46719392 by Graham2003 | 1 | 2017-03-09 20:22:08 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM Rapid Welding is an unlikely name for a hardware shop. What are you trying to map.Maps.me is a very basic editor, to do more than basics you need to use a proper editor such as iD on osm.org. |
| 46717406 by Jinzal | 1 | 2017-03-09 18:15:53 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a park over the top of an existing park. This is not a good idea.I will revert (undo) this edit. |
| 2 | 2017-03-09 18:16:18 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, the park was already mapped so I have removed your duplication and put the name onto the existing area. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-16 15:44:00 UTC | DaveF | Removed | |
| 46614832 by Dyserth | 1 | 2017-03-06 13:10:46 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387927974 appears to be total fantasy. There is no separate way visible on bing or mapbox imagery. Also many entry exit nodes are shared which causes exit counts to be wrong, i.e. you have to enter a roundabout to leave it. Oneway on a roundabout is not neede... |
| 2 | 2017-03-07 01:26:47 UTC | Dyserth | Fantastic appearances can be deceptive. The left carriageway separates into three lanes here, the left hand one of which you can only use to bypass the roundabout, turning left along Abergele Road. You cannot enter it. I have therefore tagged it as a one-way Primary Link as this lane has no intersec... | |
| 46593568 by M saf40 | 1 | 2017-03-05 22:31:32 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this looks very small and an odd place for a hospital. What were you trying to achieve |
| 30451635 by Dyserth | 1 | 2017-03-05 19:40:11 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I got some odd instructions from maps.me for this roundabout today. Now I am home and able to check I see that for some strange reason you removed the roundabout tags and replaced it with oneway. Why? |
| 2 | 2017-03-07 01:51:43 UTC | Dyserth | If I remember correctly at some point iD was not showing roundabouts as oneway unless they were tagged as such. I did change a few tags to reflect this as clearly roundabouts are not two-way flows but clearly this flaw in the editor has now been rectified. However because that edit was done 2 years ... | |
| 46591270 by Michael RotWild | 1 | 2017-03-05 09:45:07 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Please remember that osm is a live database, please do not usr it for tests. I am removing this doodle. |
| 46570563 by johnnieb54 | 1 | 2017-03-04 17:30:44 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, thank you for adding these footpaths, however they should not end where the gate/stile is, they need to connect to the road otherwise routers will see them as dead ends and not use them.I have connected the footpaths to the roads.Cheers Phil |
| 46505236 by chris_debian | 1 | 2017-03-02 20:17:18 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, not sure how closely you were looking here, but the smaller roundabout is clearly a mini-roundabout. |
| 2 | 2017-03-03 09:32:49 UTC | chris_debian | Hi, trigpoint.Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I've done some reading, and it seems that a mini-roundabout is frequently described as being a white painted circle, on the road, or a slightlyraised white bump, in the road. Having reexamined this roundabout, for it's construction and size... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-03 21:25:48 UTC | trigpoint | The definition of a mini-roundabout is not necessarily painted white, but it needs to be traversable. At least one in Oakengates is cobblestones.This one is very definitely a mini-roundabout, and painted white, so I have corrected it. | |
| 46546103 by johnnieb54 | 1 | 2017-03-03 16:33:50 UTC | trigpoint | Hi johnnieThere was no need to remove these paths, I am in no doubt that they exist. They just needed to be connected to Thornton Lane and the sidewalk tag removing as they are not sidewalks. But please do no check OS, we do not have permission to use such data, what you see is the best data we ... |
| 46532033 by sb200 | 1 | 2017-03-02 20:24:08 UTC | trigpoint | Vandalism reverted |
| 46461127 by nyuriks | 1 | 2017-03-02 20:18:51 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please can you explain this change, as far as I know wikipedia tags are not case sensitive. Who decided they must start with a capital letter? |
| 2 | 2017-03-02 20:25:05 UTC | nyuriks | Hi @trigpoint, the Wikipedia title has a "normalized" form (actually the rules for it are very complex, such as each portion of the title has to be capital first, such as namespace, after namespace, and after each "/" if subpages are enabled). Plus some url decoding, spaces inste... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-03 22:09:55 UTC | nyuriks | I just updated my auto-generated page with lists: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Yurik/OSM_wiki_tag_problems#List_pages -- these are only wikipedia articles with their wikidata's "instance of" = Q13406463 and Q15623926, but I could obviously add more. Let me know | |
| 4 | 2017-03-03 22:10:23 UTC | nyuriks | oops, wrong changeset, sorry. | |
| 46523808 by liamrocker | 1 | 2017-03-02 19:50:12 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I'm not sure the address and postcode belong on the ATM. They belong to the post office to which it is attached :) |
| 46362645 by Shagpoke | 1 | 2017-02-24 18:22:40 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Priory Country Park is already mapped as a nature reserve. Adding a park over the top seems contradictory and doubles the name. Bing imagery seems to confirm it is not what we normally tag as a park. |
| 2 | 2017-03-02 18:40:03 UTC | trigpoint | No response, so reverted | |
| 46529263 by johnnieb54 | 1 | 2017-03-02 18:29:30 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions, however you do need to connect them to the road for them to be useful. Also I do not think footway=sidewalk is really an accurate description of these cross-field rights of way.The correct way to tag rights of way is highway=footway, designation=pu... |
| 46519756 by NickJones435 | 1 | 2017-03-02 18:19:36 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit however you have created a number of duplications. McDonalds and TNT were already mapped using ways, mapping with nodes are a bit of a step backwards.Also the name tag is for an actual name, and should not be used for descriptions such as 'playground' an... |
| 46466438 by LinCC open | 1 | 2017-03-02 18:05:22 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. I have been trying to work out what you were doing here and all I could find were two new ways which had no tags. I am going to revert this change.Please carry on editing, but it is better to map things locally that you know well to start with. |
| 46488863 by Shraddhayuga | 1 | 2017-03-01 10:13:00 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.In OSM we map what exists on the ground, the tags you have added suggest that this is on the wrong continent. Please remove and, if it.really exists, add.in an appropriate place. But please remember that OSM is not a business directory. |
| 46427801 by The Maarssen Mapper | 1 | 2017-02-28 13:18:26 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, just wondering if ref:gss has any purpose in osm. There appear to be several within the town, why this one? and what purpose do they serve? The areas have no geographic meaning and appear to have been drawn by a 2 year old.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-02-28 13:30:59 UTC | The Maarssen Mapper | Hi PhilThe areas are civil parishes, so they are definitely geographically relevant, just like districts and counties. The ref:gss indicates the ID of the polygon in official records. When the boundary changes, it gets a new ID, so knowing which version of the boundary is represented by the relati... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-28 19:42:30 UTC | trigpoint | A google search took me in a little deeper and that gave a strange area, http://statistics.data.gov.uk/doc/statistical-geography/E00147121 which I could not work out the logic behind although it was suggested that it is postcodes, that example cuts at least one postcode in half.It does feel wrong ... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-28 20:07:38 UTC | The Maarssen Mapper | Hi Phil,An output area is only for statistical and not for local government jurisdictions... E00 polygons are not present in OSM as far as I know. The immediate source of the data may be OSBL, but the actual source of the boundary is GSS, who provide the boundaries to the OS, also for "public... | |
| 46359243 by Shane639 | 1 | 2017-02-24 18:29:58 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution however Rose Park appears to be someones back garden, please remember that we only map things that exist on the ground. |
| 46373473 by espeonlee | 1 | 2017-02-24 17:56:28 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution, based on your description and aerial imagery this area is a recreation ground, rather than a park. I have changed it and added the playground. |
| 46288551 by Mike Whitton | 1 | 2017-02-21 22:15:00 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to osm. Something has gone a little wrong here, the building you have created is rather large and covers several streets. Would you like some help fixing it? |
| 2 | 2017-02-22 07:39:15 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello yes welcome.Your next changeset made incorrect alterations so I've reverted both changeset as both have problems.I researched your company and have added a POI at the building mapped as 46 Loman Street. Please check this out and adjust as necessary.RegardsBernard | |
| 46275705 by Brianstapes | 1 | 2017-02-21 18:46:11 UTC | trigpoint | Hi BrianHi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution, I agree that the hypens are not required, although you have made a small typo in the name.Yout have used map.me to make the change, which is a bit Mickey Mouse when it comes to names. Your name has gone into name:en, which is a bit iro... |
| 46193747 by Ben1604 | 1 | 2017-02-18 14:36:23 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM tagging is sometimes subtle, there is a difference between a park and a recreattion ground and all evidence suggests this is a recreation ground.1. OS Opendata calls it a recreation ground.2. Imagery shows a grassy area with pitches laid out, that definitely fits the w... |
| 2 | 2017-02-18 16:57:22 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted and name added | |
| 46187245 by Tom Webster | 1 | 2017-02-18 12:28:55 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your input however your comments make me a little wary. You state 'as per OS map', current OS maps are copyright and cannot be used in OSM and your lines do not match older out of copyright data.When mapping rights of way we map the line as it exists on the ground... |
| 2 | 2017-02-18 14:11:54 UTC | Tom Webster | Phil, Many thanks for your input. I came across this site whilst looking for local walks and footpaths and then thought to check paths crossing our own land. Your current map appears to be incorrect and shows a path that does not exist in practice or on any other map I have seen. It is this that... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-18 15:36:18 UTC | trigpoint | Hi TomThank you for your comments, that sounds like you have actually made these changes using your own knowledge, rather than just copied from another map. This is the kind of input we prefer, there is no need to justify what you know/have seen by quoting another source.Thank you for your input... | |
| 46172921 by Spidey | 1 | 2017-02-17 18:59:32 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted |
| 46139215 by mArtagnan | 1 | 2017-02-16 23:45:17 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Something little wrong.You seem to have created a number of duplicate/overlapping ways on the southbound Blackwall Tunnel. What were you trying to achieve? Maybe we can help?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 11:45:57 UTC | mArtagnan | Hi PhilVery sorry about that, im new to OSM so must have done it wrong. Basically, the southbound blackwall tunnel route doesn't work i.e. it routes me around to the rotherhithe tunnel instead even when i put the start point really close to the blackwall tunnell. I concluded there must be someth... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-17 12:13:08 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you MartinI will sort it out.Which router are you using?Phil | |
| 4 | 2017-02-17 13:06:28 UTC | mArtagnan | i was testing the route on the OSM website http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/51.4909/0.0043But i use the Scout map Sat Nav app in my car. Thats based on open street mapMany thanks | |
| 5 | 2017-02-17 14:23:32 UTC | trigpoint | I have reverted your changes and am trying to understand the problem. I can see that there is an issue with OSRM, but Mapzen works fine.Will keep you posted.Phil | |
| 46143672 by Cunsted | 1 | 2017-02-16 23:15:16 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Please could you keep your edits to sensible areas. Edits like this are hard for other mappers to follow.Thanks |
| 45925506 by Spidey | 1 | 2017-02-16 22:53:01 UTC | trigpoint | ?? |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 17:45:58 UTC | chillly | reverted | |
| 3 | 2017-02-17 17:46:41 UTC | chillly | reverted | |
| 45955690 by Spidey | 1 | 2017-02-16 22:52:41 UTC | trigpoint | Personal marker? |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 17:45:01 UTC | chillly | reverted | |
| 46009402 by Spidey | 1 | 2017-02-16 22:41:53 UTC | trigpoint | More personal markers? |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 17:44:23 UTC | chillly | reverted | |
| 46018453 by Spidey | 1 | 2017-02-16 22:40:36 UTC | trigpoint | These look like personal markers, what are you trying to achieve? |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 17:43:33 UTC | chillly | reverted | |
| 46146051 by Spidey | 1 | 2017-02-16 22:36:04 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this looks a bit odd. What are you trying to achieve? Maybe we can help. |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 17:41:57 UTC | chillly | reverted | |
| 46090418 by Claude Audouy | 1 | 2017-02-14 21:40:40 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. This looks a bit odd. Do you really return hire cars to the middle of the road? |
| 2 | 2017-02-27 20:36:08 UTC | eric_ | I just moved it to the correct location. | |
| 46030832 by Spidey | 1 | 2017-02-12 22:34:33 UTC | trigpoint | A Chalet in Osbaston? Seems unlikely |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 17:42:44 UTC | chillly | reverted | |
| 46019572 by Catherine Lewis | 1 | 2017-02-12 13:38:44 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. What is this artwork, it seems a very odd location.Thanks Phil |
| 2 | 2017-02-12 18:01:52 UTC | Catherine Lewis | it's my workshop/studio. abd the whole lane has many artists studios. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-12 19:19:14 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you, it should be tagged as something like craft=artist, that is assuming it is verifiable. will I see a sign if I walk along that street.As it stands it is definitely incorrectly tagged.It would be good if you can correct it, you will need to use a proper OSM editor such as iD from osm.or... | |
| 45946299 by markf0wle | 1 | 2017-02-09 14:20:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. IMHO one ought not to assume speed limits, it's really just guessing. Would it be possible to go there and properly survey the roads. |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 14:27:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Oh and the foot-way, are cycles allowed there? Also the foot-way is not joined to the roads at each end so software will not be able to route along it.Regards | |
| 3 | 2017-02-09 19:15:50 UTC | markf0wle | I live on this road. The speed limit isn't sign posted on the estate, my assumption was my interpretation of the highway code. I will double check & correct if nessecary.I will amend the footpath. Yes, bicycles are permitted on all the footpaths in the area to my knowledge. | |
| 4 | 2017-02-11 15:53:48 UTC | trigpoint | You have tagged Welling Road as lanes=1, is that true? It doesn't look like a single track road on bing imagery.Also 20mph areas cannot exist without signs. | |
| 5 | 2017-02-11 22:57:23 UTC | markf0wle | OK, good shout. I have corrected the lanes on Welling Rd, is 2 lanes - 1 in each direction.I have too found this reviewing the highway code, therefore the official speed limit would be 30mph as that is the last posted speed as you enter Welling Road from Brentwood Road. | |
| 6 | 2017-02-12 07:14:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Would you then correct the speed limits on the estate please? It would be wrong for OSM, (the best map in the world), to knowingly contain wrong data.Regards | |
| 7 | 2017-02-12 13:01:45 UTC | markf0wle | Done Sir. | |
| 45978096 by GVMaps | 1 | 2017-02-10 19:08:51 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. I think maybe something has gone a bit wrong here, I suspect you mean the London Astoria however that closed in 2009.Is there something here you have surveyed recently? |
| 2 | 2017-02-10 19:10:22 UTC | trigpoint | I am reverting this edit as this area is a construction site for crossrail.Please comment if I am wrong? | |
| 45921032 by B'o'B | 1 | 2017-02-08 21:26:27 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, are you sure this path has gone. I do remember it was to be retained and quarried around. It and the bridge are clearly on bing imagery. Has it since gone? If so what is the new route of The Rutland Round as the relation now has a hole in it. |
| 2 | 2017-02-08 22:54:03 UTC | B'o'B | The diversion route was temporary and the Rutland Round and E229 footpath are now back on the original line which is the straighter path to the NE of the path I deleted. Kind regards | |
| 3 | 2017-02-08 22:58:22 UTC | B'o'B | My apologies for making a hole in the Rutland Round route I had assumed it was still marked on the original route which it has now been returned to | |
| 4 | 2017-02-10 09:27:33 UTC | B'o'B | I have re-edited the removal of the temporary diversion of the Rutland Round by moving the nodes to the line of the footpath that it now follows instead of deleting it. I hope this is satisfactory to you. | |
| 5 | 2017-02-10 17:11:21 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you, I have tidied up a bit and all looks good now. | |
| 45965014 by 드리머 | 1 | 2017-02-10 13:55:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Dreamer. This POI "Buckingham Palace" is actually along way from the Palace.The Palace is already tagged as tourism so no extra tag is needed there, would you please then remove inadvertent POI?Your POI "Greenwich" is not needed either as the place is already mapped, ... |
| 2 | 2017-02-10 17:06:19 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Brian, I have reverted both of these changsets,Maps.me users are very unlikely to respond and maps.me is not capable of changing or removing anything. | |
| 45881722 by Suzy May | 1 | 2017-02-09 18:31:49 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I have spotted that you have been making a lot of edits in different areas and wondered what you are changing as you have not put any changeset comments in.In this particular changset you have deleted on side of the triangle at the junction of Plex Road and Plex Lane, http://www.openstreetma... |
| 45920770 by B'o'B | 1 | 2017-02-08 19:32:01 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. The correct way to tag a private road is to add the tag access=private rather than simply deleting it from the map.The presence is useful as a navigational aid and some people will need to route to the farm. By adding private routers will not route along that way.It is al... |
| 2 | 2017-02-08 22:36:50 UTC | B'o'B | Hi, thanks for the welcome. Please allow me to explain my edits. I would normally take your point about unnecessary tags although in my dealings with people on the footpaths on bikes, horses and on one occasion a motorcycle people don't always fully understand the rights of access and I have just... | |
| 45826715 by Jesus Tudela | 1 | 2017-02-05 15:40:17 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I have reverted your London changes. You have deleted a building that was already correctly mapped as residential, with full address data, it is a Hall of Residence and you replaced it with a hostel node. |
| 2 | 2017-02-05 17:26:54 UTC | Jesus Tudela | I'm sorry, but I have a reservation in a hostel (LSE Bankside House, http://www.lsevacations.co.uk/Accommodation/Bankside-House/Bankside-House.aspx) located in the same direction, and in that same Building, and I thought ALL building was a Hostel. I am going to put a new point that reflects the Host... | |
| 45810856 by bhaskars | 1 | 2017-02-04 17:44:21 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for these additions, they are very useful. One small thing, these types of path are normally tagged as highway=footway, highway=pedestrian is normally used for pedestranised streets such as Gallowtree Gate. Keep up the good work.Phil |
| 45797585 by gasman1954 | 1 | 2017-02-04 09:56:17 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. The post office was already mapped so I have removed the duplication. |
| 45798619 by Fabulous Limousines | 1 | 2017-02-04 09:48:23 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. You seem to havbe misplaced this node. It has an address in the US yet you have put it in London.I am reverting this edit.Please drop the verbal diarrhea in the changeset comment. |
| 45776874 by Stuart Lennox-Hill | 1 | 2017-02-03 13:43:08 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Some of your edits seem a little strange. For example if I were to visit this location will I actually see a monument? and if I do is it really in the middle of the road?Also tagging a modern office building and a bike rack as historic is very bizarre. What were you trying to a... |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 14:05:24 UTC | Stuart Lennox-Hill | I seem to be having some difficulty with the tagging, it's copying from history. (Same with the edit notes... it's using the old one).The office building is Vantage House, right next to it is the bike rack, they should be two completely separate edits?! I had to un-merge it once already. Zoom in... | |
| 45738771 by Leon Strejček | 1 | 2017-02-02 12:38:20 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. The school is already mapped as an area and with a name.I am removing this duplication.Cheers Phil |
| 45712620 by Attai | 1 | 2017-02-01 10:33:09 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the new road. You may like to join it to Millhall Road. This allows routing by phone and satnav to get people to the road.HTH |
| 2 | 2017-02-01 10:37:13 UTC | trigpoint | Also please could you capitalise the name correctly, thanks | |
| 45697115 by MAPSTYLE | 1 | 2017-01-31 20:51:29 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.We try to map things accurately as they exist in the real world This and many of your other additions appear to be doodles, this one is on top of a road. |
| 2 | 2017-02-01 07:38:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed duplicated way. | |
| 45676845 by edeped | 1 | 2017-01-31 20:05:09 UTC | trigpoint | I am reverting this change, you have turned a correctly mapped skateboard area into a park, that is considered vandalism |
| 45677727 by edeped | 1 | 2017-01-31 19:46:51 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, you seem to have changed a wood that had been added by another mapper to a park. I can see it is a wood so I have fixed it. |
| 45677945 by edeped | 1 | 2017-01-31 19:35:07 UTC | trigpoint | HI, you seem to have added a park to a mountain area. In OSM we map what exists on the ground and this is not most peoples idea of a park.I am reverting this edit. |
| 45632077 by CrunchU | 1 | 2017-01-29 21:44:19 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. The paths you added were already mapped as service roads, you therefore created duplications. I have removed these. |
| 45630128 by Mickydeedee | 1 | 2017-01-29 21:00:42 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Something has gone a little wrong here, you have added impossible paths which pass through houses. I have reverted this change.Please remember that we add only what really exists. |
| 45531854 by Nwillowsrough | 1 | 2017-01-26 22:08:34 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the edit. You need to add amenity=fuel to mark the object as a fuel station. It probably isn't called 'Petrol Station', so changing the name to the name that is displayed on the business would be good too.HTH |
| 2 | 2017-01-29 16:55:17 UTC | trigpoint | I have tagged this from memory, will check sometime or NWillowsrough can confirm.Cheers Phil | |
| 45624625 by mappingisgr8 | 1 | 2017-01-29 16:39:27 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. I have reverted this changeset as you have incorrectly changed recreation grounds and a common to parks.The clue is in the name i.e. Fryern Rec is not likely to be a park. |
| 45586934 by Leebanun | 1 | 2017-01-28 20:43:03 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM we map things that really exist on the ground, we do not map thing that do not exist such as your reservoir, a garden as a park or footpaths through gardens. I am reverting your edits |
| 45568757 by Rocky1234 | 1 | 2017-01-27 18:10:02 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. I assume this footpath is meant to connect to Wellbeck Drive? For it to be usable it does need to connect. Shout up if you need a hand. |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 19:20:13 UTC | BCNorwich | I don't think there is a footpath goes through the houses just there. | |
| 45533170 by ARSENAL269 | 1 | 2017-01-27 17:42:08 UTC | trigpoint | You seem to have deleted all the buildings in the botanic gardens, that is vandalism. Reverting |
| 45533332 by ARSENAL269 | 1 | 2017-01-27 17:28:25 UTC | trigpoint | These areas were correctly mapped as grass, they are not parks. Reverting |
| 45533484 by ARSENAL269 | 1 | 2017-01-27 17:22:22 UTC | trigpoint | You have for some reason changed two schools to colleges, that is clearly incorrect they are very definitely schools. I am reverting this edit |
| 45533954 by ARSENAL269 | 1 | 2017-01-27 17:06:57 UTC | trigpoint | Reverting fiction |
| 45534052 by ARSENAL269 | 1 | 2017-01-27 16:18:36 UTC | trigpoint | This footpath is a duplication of the existing cycleway. I am reverting this edit. |
| 45534104 by ARSENAL269 | 1 | 2017-01-27 16:17:33 UTC | trigpoint | This footpath is fiction, I am reverting this edit |
| 45534158 by ARSENAL269 | 1 | 2017-01-27 16:13:45 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. OSM is a live database, used by many people and as such we only add what exists in the real world. There is no park here, it is houses so I am reverting this edit |
| 45534886 by It's that guy | 1 | 2017-01-26 23:45:15 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, thank you for your edit. You do seem to be making things complicated, a relation for your first edit. In this case it is not really needed, just join the two way and put the tags there. And of course delete the relation.Give me a shout if you need a hand. |
| 45511393 by Sandra Fornas | 1 | 2017-01-26 23:38:13 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Something appears to have gone a bit wrong here. You seem to have deleted a large number of POIs. I am sure that was an accident so I am going to revert this changeset.If you would like to comment and explain what you were intending then we can help |
| 45506386 by Pokemonlfc | 1 | 2017-01-26 23:30:40 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM, I am reverting this as we only map what already exists and this is housing. |
| 45534287 by thelittlehill | 1 | 2017-01-26 23:16:36 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Please remember that OSM is a live database and that we only map what exists in the real world,This area is clearly not a park, I have reverted this change. BTW It is unlikely you will find a missing park in Wigston. |
| 45436606 by Burtonio | 1 | 2017-01-26 12:51:58 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your addition, however Greenfields Rec was already correctly mapped as a recreation_ground. Your park was a duplication which I have removed.Please ask if you need advice on adding information to OSM.Cheers Phil |
| 45448674 by hypothenar | 1 | 2017-01-24 20:35:03 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. The area around a church should be tagged as a churchyard. It is not likely to be a park. That seems to be mistagging. |
| 45428074 by Packwood Haugh | 1 | 2017-01-24 18:21:18 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.Thank you for correcting the position of the Admiral Duncan, although we only map the building where it is, I have tidyed this up and mapped the car park. The beer garden isn't exactly a park so I have retagged it.The village green can be tagged as a village green, no need to ... |
| 45360043 by RitterR | 1 | 2017-01-22 12:47:15 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, please can you point me to where these changes, and the others in the series, were discussed?Thanks Phil |
| 2 | 2017-01-24 17:13:38 UTC | RitterR | hi, sorry form my english. I use google translator.I based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Demergency_phone.Many of these nodes has been added long ago, and no one since then has not changed under the new rules adopted.I watched thes points, and if they were on the highw... | |
| 45354867 by TomLopez | 1 | 2017-01-21 17:43:43 UTC | trigpoint | I am reverting this as it is spam. |
| 45352945 by lukexplores | 1 | 2017-01-21 16:24:31 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your addition of a footpath. It looks good.As you are local I wonder if you could check the legal access status of Vincents Roadm it has previously been tagged as access=permissive which looks a little odd.Thanks Phil |
| 44772736 by dmgroom_ct | 1 | 2017-01-02 14:17:11 UTC | imagico | I would consider this essentially mapping for the renderer - beaches do extent below the high water line obviously and natural=tidal_beach is not documented while equivalent established tagging exists (natural=beach + tidal=yes)If the lowest parts here is still a beach (i.e. wave formed) or a ti... |
| 2 | 2017-01-15 11:05:48 UTC | dmgroom_ct | The wiki is very clear that the tag "natural = beach" is only for the part of the beach above the MHW line.So what you refer to as established tagging is still in contravention of what is expected. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-16 11:03:54 UTC | imagico | Well - the 'how to map' section on the wiki does not represent common mapping practice here and contradicts the basic definition of natural=beach as a landform.The wiki by the way currently also says you should tag the part of a beach below the high water line as natural=shoal - which of course ... | |
| 4 | 2017-01-17 14:26:32 UTC | dmgroom_ct | I will emnail you via the OSM msg system | |
| 5 | 2017-01-21 16:16:05 UTC | trigpoint | Please don't do that, it is better to keep these discussion in the open.Thanks Phl | |
| 45278608 by Chad_M | 1 | 2017-01-18 19:23:13 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. This edit looks very odd, what is the source you are using. It seems very odd to map mud around jettys.Also please could you use meaningful changeset comments describing what you have done so that other mappers know what you are intending. #thamesmapathon tells us nothing.T... |
| 41094685 by brianh | 1 | 2017-01-18 19:11:26 UTC | trigpoint | Please see comments on note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/650624The spelling does not match OS Opendata Locator or local tradition.Thanks Phil |
| 2 | 2017-01-19 09:47:38 UTC | ACS1986 | By bizarre coincidence I stopped at the premier inn next door earlier in the year and noticed the Dutch spelling at the time. Unless it has been changed Kopje is the spelling on the road sign | |
| 45219274 by maldav | 1 | 2017-01-16 16:20:28 UTC | maldav | I do not seem to be able to label the route 6. What am I doing wrong? |
| 2 | 2017-01-17 12:44:20 UTC | trigpoint | What do you mean by label? What are you expecting | |
| 3 | 2017-01-17 13:08:40 UTC | SK53 | If you want it to appear on the transport map I think you need to put the bus route number in the ref tag, so add ref=6 and then it should appear along the relevant roads. Here's an example from my own area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/71283 | |
| 4 | 2017-01-17 21:39:09 UTC | maldav | Many thanks for this information. It took me a while to realise that I was missing the Relation:route. I have now found the details on the wiki. This information didn't appear with the existing bus routes 4 and 4a put on by someone else. I now have to decide how far along the route I need to go. ... | |
| 45141513 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-01-13 19:20:26 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Bernard, you have missed sport=soccorCheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-01-13 20:14:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Phil,No I didn't miss it, I left it for you, please see my comment here :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45139235#map=18/51.75318/0.45146, just joking. It will always be football to me! What do you think, conform or not?Regards Bernard | |
| 45129340 by dmgroom_ct | 1 | 2017-01-13 19:15:46 UTC | trigpoint | Another undisguised mass edit, with no explanation. And you are still ignoring mappers comments. |
| 2 | 2017-01-15 10:00:52 UTC | dmgroom_ct | I was nit ignoring mappers commenst, I have no idea what changeset comments were not being emailed to me, but to be fair there were enough other ways of contacting me. | |
| 45074747 by dmgroom_ct | 1 | 2017-01-11 12:57:35 UTC | DaveF | HiOut of curiosity, what software are you using to validate these errors? |
| 2 | 2017-01-11 18:27:18 UTC | trigpoint | And what are you actually fixing, and please map in smaller areas so that you don't waste mappers time trying to work out which of the 6 pages are in their area. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-15 09:56:22 UTC | dmgroom_ct | It's not a mass edit. Each edit was individually made my me after viewing Bing imagery, looking at the error I was trying to fix, and then fixing it in JOSMThe sort of problems fixed are:mainly highways which do not connect to other highways, for a number of reasons , including:a) the 1st... | |
| 45052485 by Derby45 | 1 | 2017-01-10 18:58:35 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, FP20 is a public right of way reference and should be put in the prow_ref tag, rather than the name. The name tag is for names.It is certainly not FP20 for the majority of its length, it obviously isn't a Leicestershire right of way reference.It also needs a bit more, I doubt it is Derbyshir... |
| 2 | 2017-01-11 09:56:41 UTC | Derby45 | Hi Phil, I continued on an existing path, I guess the name was already in there.I've seen a few of those names in the area, I'm aware some older OS maps show these references.I've cut the path where I continued the line. Name removed from my edit, but I've left the original as it is for now.... | |
| 44950151 by Eddie hanham | 1 | 2017-01-09 09:39:34 UTC | stev | This, and many other changesets from the user appears to be erroneuous advertising information. I have also sent the user a message |
| 2 | 2017-01-10 18:19:40 UTC | trigpoint | You should revert them. they are spam. Shout up if you need any help. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-12 16:30:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info, I added https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/843348 about a week ago. | |
| 45005561 by ajwhiteh | 1 | 2017-01-08 17:11:57 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. What does ref:sponsored mean? |
| 44900490 by geoffsmith234 | 1 | 2017-01-04 18:07:04 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Geoff, welcome to OSM but please remember that OSM is a live database. It should not be used for testing. To get started it is far better to find something that is missing and add that, or a shop that has changed name. Simply adding a node with a name will not render without other tags describing... |
| 2 | 2017-01-08 12:04:30 UTC | trigpoint | No response received so I am reverting this change | |
| 44878848 by debelasers | 1 | 2017-01-05 13:44:47 UTC | Robert Whittaker | Is the node at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4587558092 in the correct location? (I've just added some buildings and roads for Apperley Court from arial imagery. Should be node be within the building?)You also appear to have changed the address of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/36789780... |
| 2 | 2017-01-05 13:53:35 UTC | debelasers | Hi Robert, Yes the node should be in one of the buildings but I couldn't place it correctly on the first go and then couldn't work out how to move it. We are in the north east corner of Appley Court, directly facing the access road.And yes we moved from St Francis Way in November so I was trying t... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-05 13:54:57 UTC | debelasers | Also, Electronics shop is a poor description of what we do (we design industrial lasers) but it was the closest I could find | |
| 4 | 2017-01-06 15:19:38 UTC | trigpoint | Shop is probably the wrong description, made_made=works, product=industrial_lasers would fit better I think.You will need to use a proper computer based editor, such as iD, rather than maps.me as it only allows a very limited subset of pre-defined tags to be used. | |
| 44952798 by MikeValentineUK | 1 | 2017-01-06 13:49:36 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.The correct way to tag a a postcode is addr:postcode rather than the name tag. I am not sure what Wy Wyri is, but the middle of the road is an odd place, postcodes normally apply to places where mail is delivered to, and maybe use addr:housename.Trees are mapped as natural=tre... |
| 2 | 2017-01-06 13:52:31 UTC | MikeValentineUK | Cheers Phil.I'm completely new here and clearly blundering around whilst trying to make myself accessible to the World!The trees are a local landmark and regular navigation aid.Mike | |
| 3 | 2017-01-06 14:00:20 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you Mike, they sound a useful thing to add. If you change them to natural=tree, you probably need a new node so you have one for each tree, then tag them as natural=tree then they will show on the map. You can add species:en=oak, maybe species:cy if you can.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi... | |
| 44953138 by billybond007 | 1 | 2017-01-06 13:34:56 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.THis edit looks a little odd, a stream that passes through a house.I am reverting this edit. |
| 44917073 by Tey Jun Yuan | 1 | 2017-01-05 12:56:04 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.Heathrow is already mapped, please do not add personal markers to the map.I have removed this node. |
| 44903867 by jireland | 1 | 2017-01-04 18:08:55 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. This should probably be amenity=social club, bar implies it is open to the public, whereas a social club has membership rules.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-01-04 19:56:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Yes welcome to OSM. Actually the facility is already mapped and all information is on the building outline. It is tagged as amenity=social_club, so I have removed your POI so as not to duplicate the information, hope that's OK. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-04 19:59:23 UTC | trigpoint | Well spotted, the building and club outline are separate and overlapping ways. That could do with a tidy up while you are removing the node. | |
| 4 | 2017-01-04 21:02:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Sorry forgot to mention the duplicate I removed as well. | |
| 44846077 by Peledie | 1 | 2017-01-02 14:09:57 UTC | trigpoint | Hello, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit however something has gone a little wrong here, you seem to have created 2 untagged ways on top of existing ways.What were you trying to achieve, maybe we can help.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-01-02 14:10:52 UTC | chillly | Hi, Welcome to OSM.You seem to be struggling. You have added two things over te top of existing roads, but they are not tagged in any way to say what you intend them to be. Did you mean to save this? Would you like some help to tidy this up? We would like you to add or improve stuff in the a... | |
| 44797386 by Sparky59 | 1 | 2016-12-31 11:52:32 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.This addition looks a little odd, looking at bing imagery it does not look like a car park, or accessible. What were you intending, the name trailhead also looks odd. That is an American concept. |
| 2 | 2016-12-31 19:15:46 UTC | Sparky59 | .This is a new hill walk that a local farmer has created to allow the public to use 4 purpose made trails (each between 1.5 and 5.5 km long, from the car park, along the side of the river and then up into the hills before returning to the car park.The car park is a small stone area with room... | |
| 3 | 2016-12-31 21:17:46 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you for that information, it just looked a bit odd with no road link.Its not possible with maps.me, but would it be possible to login to osm on a pc and add the access road, bridge and car park and maybe the paths too?Ask if you need any help.Cheers Phil | |
| 44567581 by Andy snell | 1 | 2016-12-30 19:17:59 UTC | SomeoneElse | Is the pub really separate to the "Inn at Ardgour"? Does it have a different name? |
| 2 | 2016-12-31 17:29:52 UTC | trigpoint | They were one and the same place when I was there a few years ago | |
| 44807538 by John-O | 1 | 2016-12-31 16:30:58 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, thank you for your addition however you should connect the steps/paths to the road in some way otherwise you are just creating an unusable island.Cheers Phil |
| 44802975 by zauron | 1 | 2016-12-31 14:49:36 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, what does fgmn mean? |
| 44678843 by trigpoint | 1 | 2016-12-31 13:58:29 UTC | RobJN | Not bogus trigpoint! Please check before reverting. This is a grassed "park" area with paths through it. |
| 2 | 2016-12-31 14:03:01 UTC | RobJN | Needs a proper survey but I've done a basic revert of your revert as the user was right to add a park here: changeset 44807049 | |
| 3 | 2016-12-31 14:25:14 UTC | trigpoint | Sorry Rob, it does need a survey but not sure I would consider a small grassy area in the middle of a housing estate to be a park. | |
| 44793212 by meteorquake | 1 | 2016-12-31 11:22:18 UTC | trigpoint | Hello, thank you for your additions. In the UK we use footway, rather than path, for mapping PROW. I have changed these to footway and added designation=public_footpath. Not sure why we need path at all to be honest, it just confuses new mappers.The southern path you added is actually a track, aga... |
| 44789353 by Przystarz | 1 | 2016-12-30 17:11:40 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. I have spotted your edits and they appear a little strange to me.What are you trying to achieve? Maybe we can help?Cheers Phil |
| 44750154 by ORaha | 1 | 2016-12-30 13:17:44 UTC | Wynndale | Did you mean to enter the postcode as NW10 7F? |
| 2 | 2016-12-30 14:37:17 UTC | ORaha | Well there are two postcodes assigned to this building, 7FR and 7FS | |
| 3 | 2016-12-30 15:56:58 UTC | trigpoint | I assume they are for different businesses?If so then it would be better to add a node for each and remove the postcode from the building. | |
| 4 | 2016-12-30 22:43:59 UTC | ORaha | No it's a residential building. One block and different flats have different postcodes | |
| 44765993 by xWolfeBlitz | 1 | 2016-12-29 19:27:40 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM, thank you for your edit however are you sure it is a park, imagery suggests a school to me. |
| 2 | 2016-12-29 21:03:46 UTC | xWolfeBlitz | Hiya yea its a park, there is a nursery there aswell but mainly its a public park | |
| 3 | 2016-12-29 21:51:06 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you, keep on adding to OSM.Coalisland looks rather empty, there must be load of stuff to add. Schools, pubs, shops and stuff | |
| 44765344 by Zoli Futó | 1 | 2016-12-29 19:19:37 UTC | trigpoint | Please remember that OSM is a public database, it should not be used for personal markers |
| 44009435 by matteo galgani | 1 | 2016-12-29 18:55:12 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I am not sure why you changed the relation type from the British Museum, but the type multipolygon was correct, there is no such relation as building.I am fixing this mistake, but please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Types_of_relationCheers Phil |
| 44760754 by Alberto Hernández Gallardo | 1 | 2016-12-29 18:04:38 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.Shiprow 15 is a very odd name for a hotel, however 15 Shiprow is the address of the Ibis which is already mapped. I have removed your duplication as it is in the wrong place |
| 44728432 by shitworth | 1 | 2016-12-28 13:33:01 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, something has gone a little wrong here.Chessington South station is now tagged both as an active station and a disused one. Which is correct? |
| 2 | 2016-12-28 16:20:04 UTC | shitworth | Ah, that probably explains my confusion at not being able to spot it earlier. It's definitely an active station: http://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/service/ldbboard/dep/CSS | |
| 3 | 2016-12-28 17:05:15 UTC | trigpoint | It was changed a few weeks ago, will comment on that and tidy up here. He has also changed the platforms to disused. | |
| 4 | 2016-12-28 17:28:32 UTC | trigpoint | Hopefully all fixed now | |
| 44202781 by SWF8 | 1 | 2016-12-28 17:12:00 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, something has gone rather wrong with this change. You changed Chessington South to disused, which has obviously confused local mappers as it is very much still in use. I have fixed this but in future please can you add meaningful comments to your changes so that other mappers can work out what y... |
| 44687982 by skyegod | 1 | 2016-12-28 15:12:02 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the name tag is for actual names. Gated road is a description, if there are gates then map them but please to not use name for stuff like this. |
| 44711732 by conchiglie | 1 | 2016-12-27 18:12:37 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMWhen I see your first edit deleting stuff with comment of deleting excessive detail, this is worrying. OSM wants MORE detail not less. Why have you deleted stuff like this? |
| 2 | 2016-12-27 18:19:21 UTC | chillly | Looking at this more closely I have reverted this edit. There is no way all this should be deleted. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-27 18:47:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Just wanted to add support to the decision to revert this changeset. It's very easy to make mistakes when you first jump into OSM mapping, I'm sure freefromsociety can make positive contributions. Just takes little research as to best practices first. | |
| 4 | 2016-12-28 09:27:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Whilst it might make sense to restore some of this detail, I'm a bit sceptical about others - I doubt that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385445828 is any sort of "pedestrian area", for example. | |
| 5 | 2016-12-28 14:04:24 UTC | trigpoint | Also, whilst not part of this changeset. The A16 is incorrectly mapped as a dual carriageway. This could use a tidy up. | |
| 44715622 by mapper2017 | 1 | 2016-12-27 20:59:33 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. The paths you added in Central Park were a duplication of the existing cycleways. I have removed the duplication. |
| 44693630 by Barbara Agnarelli | 1 | 2016-12-27 18:13:30 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. This edit has gone a little wrong, the Drayton Court Hotel is already mapped, I have removed your duplication. |
| 44682080 by skyegod | 1 | 2016-12-26 14:57:51 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. The paths you have added seem to be pure fiction. There are no marks on the ground and they cross pitches.Please remember that in OSM we only add what exists in the real world. |
| 44635297 by Afrocomb | 1 | 2016-12-24 11:16:05 UTC | trigpoint | Does http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461460787 really exist, it looks like it goes through someones garden? |
| 2 | 2016-12-25 16:59:12 UTC | Afrocomb | Yes. the three tracks can be seen on this source http://www.rowmaps.com/showmap.php?place=Almondbury&map=OS&lat=53.6354&lon=1.74837&lonew=WThey can also normally be found on the local council website rights of way map (http://maps.kirklees.gov.uk/publicrightsofway/map.aspx?postco... | |
| 3 | 2016-12-26 10:36:07 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you, just couln't see it on aerial imagery | |
| 44672361 by BenBaker42 | 1 | 2016-12-26 10:05:33 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. The footpath you have added is a duplication of the existing cycleway, I have removed the duplication. |
| 44664084 by Tao Macgurin | 1 | 2016-12-25 16:12:18 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted |
| 44663978 by Tao Macgurin | 1 | 2016-12-25 16:08:48 UTC | trigpoint | Please remember that OSM is a public database, please do not add personal markers.I am reverting this addition |
| 44660785 by AdammJones | 1 | 2016-12-25 13:43:03 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Please remember that OSM is a map in which we map what exists in the real world. Please do not retag objects for your own purposes, this is considered vandalism.I have reverted your changes as neither are parks. |
| 44648395 by Harrymapping | 1 | 2016-12-24 17:01:39 UTC | trigpoint | Is there really a pear tree in the middle of the road? |
| 2 | 2016-12-24 17:05:05 UTC | Harrymapping | So sorry, it's left a bit, there's a residents pear tree at the end of the road. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-24 17:31:34 UTC | trigpoint | You may want to create new node and tag it as natural=tree, tree=pear.Just creating a point with a name does nothing.Cheers Phil | |
| 44648365 by Harrymapping | 1 | 2016-12-24 17:02:03 UTC | trigpoint | Please can you explain this? |
| 2 | 2016-12-24 17:03:26 UTC | Harrymapping | There's a small plaque on the wall for Bobby. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-24 17:30:04 UTC | trigpoint | This is normally mapped as historic=memorial then memorial=plaque. You may want to add some more detail, they usually say a bit more than Bobby.Cheers Phil | |
| 44635602 by Ben Ruane | 1 | 2016-12-24 11:09:09 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted fiction |
| 44632640 by opmilne | 1 | 2016-12-23 21:39:59 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Please remember that OSM is a live database, and we only map what exists in the real world.Aerial imagery suggests that this path does not exist, can you convince me otherwise? |
| 2 | 2016-12-24 08:15:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Yes Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The park doesn't look right either. I can find no reference to a park or public space here. It is likely to be part of Woolmer's park, a large farm. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-24 11:07:35 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted | |
| 44603490 by agniuks | 1 | 2016-12-23 17:27:59 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.I think this change has gone a little wrong, you have changed New Walk from a pedestrian street to a footway which seems a little odd to me as it has been mapped that way since it was first mapped 9 years ago. Just wondering why you consider it to be wrong?You have also create... |
| 2 | 2016-12-24 10:48:51 UTC | trigpoint | I have restored New Walk and Highcross to highway=pedestrian | |
| 44635873 by Eddiejohn | 1 | 2016-12-24 09:42:58 UTC | trigpoint | HI, welcome to OSM. We only map what exists on thbe ground, and we do not mis-tag what does exist. Changing a road to a footpath means map users will not be able to route over it. I consider your change vandalism and have reverted it. |
| 44605626 by Zanigan | 1 | 2016-12-23 09:02:07 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.What is the source of this addition? I am not aware of any such path. The name also looks a bit odd.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2016-12-23 09:39:29 UTC | Zanigan | Hey PhilYeah, made corrections to the playground in town. For some reason the name 'Minsterley Play Ground (with in-built GYM)' kept to other corrections made for some reason. Would I have to delete and re-create again to change the title?There is also a public footpath that goes directly thro... | |
| 3 | 2016-12-23 14:54:42 UTC | trigpoint | There is no need to recreate the playgound, the odd title is only on the changset, although you may want to disconnect it from the road.The name on this path is is probably not verifiable and the path obviously exists so is fine.It would be good to map the legal lines, if a farmer illegally obst... | |
| 42993393 by IttzMatty | 1 | 2016-12-22 00:33:40 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, what is the source of these edits, this entire estate looks very unlikely to really exist. |
| 2 | 2016-12-23 14:48:51 UTC | trigpoint | I drove passed here today, your edits are entirely fiction. I intend to revert them. | |
| 44499316 by CarlT | 1 | 2016-12-22 00:32:02 UTC | trigpoint | Is tourism really the correct tag for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460389218 ?Aerial imagery suggest it is residental, rather than somewhere to go on holiday? |
| 44480312 by CarlT | 1 | 2016-12-21 23:07:04 UTC | GinaroZ | Hi, noticed you added a number of duplicate POIs in this changeset. I've removed some of them, please make sure you check buildings/nodes already present before adding duplicates next time :) |
| 2 | 2016-12-22 00:26:11 UTC | trigpoint | A miners welfare is normally tagged as amenity=social_club, it is unlikely to be a traditional pub. | |
| 44556009 by nikhilprabhakar | 1 | 2016-12-21 10:34:21 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, whilst I can see that Dalefiemapld Drive has been extended on mapbox imagery, I don't see a turning circle. It looks like a cul-de-sac, you certainly cannot turn around without using reverse. |
| 2 | 2016-12-26 10:52:37 UTC | nikhilprabhakar | Hi Trigpoint,Excuse me for the late reply, I have removed the turn circle as per your feedback. Please have a look and lemme know if everything else is correct in this area. And thanks a lot for pointing this out.Regards,Nikhil | |
| 42930401 by IttzMatty | 1 | 2016-10-20 11:09:17 UTC | Mike Baggaley | HI, can you please take a look at the changes you have made to highways you have named Melton Road B666. Certainly the name should be Melton Road, rather than Melton Road B666. Are you sure the B666 still exists? If so, please put B666 in the ref field and also update the bridges and links to rounda... |
| 2 | 2016-10-22 10:32:54 UTC | trigpoint | I also don't believe that this is secondary road, you have changed it from a tertiary. It would be unlikely that a B road alternative to a bypass would be provided, it just isn't the way LCC do things.Have you any evidence that this is not a tertiary road?I also have serious doubts about the B... | |
| 3 | 2016-12-21 00:08:36 UTC | trigpoint | Fixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44553986 | |
| 44535446 by 西濱恭平 | 1 | 2016-12-20 20:02:05 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, something went a little wrong with this changset. Whilst you created a building in Japan, you also dragged a crossing node in London. I have fixed the node drag and hopefully did not affect the building. |
| 44548786 by MnLJack | 1 | 2016-12-20 19:39:11 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. I think that something has gone a bit wrong here. We normally change the tagging on a closed pub to disused:amenity=pub. For some reason you have changed the name of the bus stop. |
| 44548821 by MnLJack | 1 | 2016-12-20 19:36:56 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I don't think the postbox is actually named Post Box. The name tag should not normally be filled in for object such a postboxes. |
| 44494285 by vbth | 1 | 2016-12-20 17:07:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. What is actually here, is it a building or simply a signpost.I imagine that you have made a typo and it is spelt Centre rather than the American way?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2016-12-20 18:09:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that it's a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/410268974 , actually. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-22 21:38:05 UTC | vbth | Hi, the place might be right but the name was only Cymraeg for village Hall. Also it was not visioble on the (offline) map. therefore i set an named it. Just give it a "i"-button an name it "Myddfai Community Hall & Visitor Centre". thanks.http://www.myddfai.org/ | |
| 4 | 2016-12-27 10:55:17 UTC | SomeoneElse | @vbth I wouldn't worry too much about what any particular map does or doesn't show, since they all show different things. I've tried to merge everything together and added a building in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462068160 . | |
| 5 | 2016-12-28 09:17:45 UTC | vbth | thank you. | |
| 32409987 by Snake Sting | 1 | 2015-07-04 17:31:45 UTC | DaveF | Hi Snake SkinThere's an expression in OSM: 'Don't tag incorrectly to suit the renderer'.For accuracyIf a KG is a KG then it should be tagged as such. If you wish an item to be visible in a specific render you should contact the person creating the tiles.CheersDave F. |
| 2 | 2015-07-07 17:06:52 UTC | Snake Sting | Why don't kissing gates or stiles show up on OSM? What I mean is when you zoom right it will tell you if you hover the mouse over the node but not as a symbol on the map like gates. It would be very usefull for anybody on a bike knowing if there is a ton of stiles or kissing gates to leave bike an... | |
| 3 | 2015-08-13 10:03:16 UTC | DaveF | Sorry for the delayed reply.OSM is a database. Lot's of different rendering are mad from this one source. It allows map creators to add relevent data & ignore what the don't want.What's now described as the 'standard' map ie the mapnik rendering unfortunately doesn't render all barriers. I... | |
| 4 | 2015-08-17 13:40:56 UTC | DaveF | Err... try https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues | |
| 5 | 2015-08-17 16:47:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Looks like geocaching.com (if that's what you're talking about) offer lots of different background styles, but don't host any themselves, so you'd just have to lobby for one of those to support it; not necessarily openstreetmap-carto. | |
| 6 | 2016-12-17 21:02:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just for info, I've just added a separate "kissing_gate" icon to https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/openstreetmap-carto-AJT (that's a style that other people can use if they want to). See https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L877 for which gate types ar... | |
| 7 | 2016-12-20 16:53:37 UTC | trigpoint | Not really a comment on the mapping, or the rendering, but if a PROW has stiles or kissing gates then it is a public footpath. You should not be taking a bike on such paths. | |
| 8 | 2016-12-20 17:06:25 UTC | DaveF | There's nothing to prevent someone pushing a bike; although a few walkers have disagreed with me. | |
| 43603478 by Cezary Worowiec | 1 | 2016-11-13 16:42:02 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this looks a very odd place for a shop to be located. Is it a bakery factory? |
| 2 | 2016-12-17 13:35:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/819653 | |
| 3 | 2016-12-20 16:44:12 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted after user did not respond to changeset comments | |
| 44371093 by Seweryn Majczak | 1 | 2016-12-13 19:10:09 UTC | trigpoint | Bourns Office is a very odd name for a mobile phone shop, are you really sure about this? |
| 2 | 2016-12-20 16:38:13 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted after maps.me user didn't respond | |
| 24391013 by terrencem | 1 | 2016-01-23 17:25:53 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I think something went a little wrong here.You added cycleway=lane to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124354558 In my recollection, and looking at bing imagery, this is a two lane road with no cycling infrastructure. Did you visit the location? |
| 2 | 2016-12-20 14:09:38 UTC | trigpoint | Also http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24271318 is a 3-4m wide road. It does not have lanes, its not wide enough. It also has no sidewalk, yet you have tagged it as having a sidewalk on both sides. This can lead to misleading routing information being provided to map users.It is important that we m... | |
| 44534996 by hexingpei | 1 | 2016-12-20 11:18:35 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSN.Please remember that OSM is a live database and should not be used for test data that does not exist in the real world. |
| 43442287 by shirokazan | 1 | 2016-12-19 12:58:49 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I have reverted this change.The admin_level=10 boundary already exists and you removed the place node which is important for navigation. |
| 2 | 2016-12-19 20:48:41 UTC | shirokazan | The difficulty of the existing boundary is that it means that roads such as Curlew Croft are not recorded as Leighton Buzzard but Billington, which doesn't make any sense. | |
| 44454540 by Trebor51 | 1 | 2016-12-17 10:58:07 UTC | trigpoint | Please do not add spam to name tags or change the name of bus stops away from their official name. I am removing these tags. |
| 2 | 2016-12-17 19:00:40 UTC | SomeoneElse | Actually, I'd suggest adding a "real_ale" tag, like here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354421040 .You won't be able to do this from MAPS.ME, but you will from the web-based editors at openstreetmap.org. | |
| 44465076 by Trebor51 | 1 | 2016-12-17 10:52:45 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, is there really a church here. The area is mapped as a school and imagery suggests that the mapping was correct. |
| 2 | 2016-12-22 16:49:23 UTC | Trebor51 | If you look at Google Streetview you will see the church is to the right of the school. Look art this link: https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.5399819,-0.4513927,3a,75y,100.04h,86.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sksT2GeGoJbq0ZCS22eFjEA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656BTW I used to worship at that church and my children w... | |
| 44435058 by Beselch Gonzalez Peña | 1 | 2016-12-16 16:12:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that these are "gift" shops? If they're really record shops please don't map them as something else.You can see what shop tags are in use looking at http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/shop#values . "shop=music" seems to be the most popular tag for record shops... |
| 2 | 2016-12-16 17:29:05 UTC | trigpoint | Also please check that what you are adding is in the correct place. For example Piccadilly Records is already mapped some distance from your addition.Your additions of one type of object is spead over a very large area, what is your source of information/location. | |
| 44445426 by mrlourobinson | 1 | 2016-12-16 16:58:12 UTC | trigpoint | Please can you make meaningful comments, this is OSM not twitter and London rather than Tanzania. |
| 2 | 2016-12-16 17:01:18 UTC | mrlourobinson | Apologies, I didnt realise it had added that comment. Seems to have kept the comment from a previous change for Missing Maps. I'll be careful it doesn't happen again. | |
| 44396157 by Ladislav Jeník | 1 | 2016-12-16 16:36:40 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, oneway is unnecessary when junction=roundabout is used. I have removed these tags. |
| 44447204 by Franzi Gerstmayer | 1 | 2016-12-16 14:53:48 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Little Venice is already mapped a short distance from there. I have removed this node as it could mislead other map users. |
| 44420926 by BrianWharf | 1 | 2016-12-15 13:08:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It is impossible to work out what you wanted to achieve with this addition to the live OSM database as there are no descriptive tags. What I can deduce is that as far as I am aware this line is not verifiable as existing in reality, (unless you can enlighten me).... |
| 2 | 2016-12-15 15:05:26 UTC | BrianWharf | Feel free, what I was trying to achieve doesn't seem possible here. Also, you may wish to get somebody to read back your text as some of it seems rather condescending. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-15 16:23:49 UTC | trigpoint | What were you trying to achieve? Maybe someone can help. OSN is based around tags, so any untagged object will do nothing in OSM. | |
| 44403171 by 4b696d | 1 | 2016-12-14 19:23:45 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, did you discuss the removal of the building tags from HMS Belfast anywhere, such as with the GB community?It is long accepted practice that permanently moored ships are tagged as buildings. HMS Belfast is a significant national tourist attraction. I have replaced the tag you have removed. |
| 2 | 2016-12-14 20:54:12 UTC | 4b696d | I did not discuss anything. All I did was following the rules I found in the wiki which clearly state otherwise, but it is not my object to cause any trouble. In case you have complaints about my other edits please let me know. Don't worry about the ship, I will not touch it again. | |
| 44339326 by Xillae | 1 | 2016-12-13 19:28:50 UTC | trigpoint | Hyde Park is already mapped, reverted |
| 44337318 by Xillae | 1 | 2016-12-13 19:28:10 UTC | trigpoint | I doubt there is a clothes shop in the car park, reverted |
| 44327215 by trigpoint | 1 | 2016-12-11 19:49:22 UTC | GinaroZ | from their website/social media it seems like the name should be lowercase? |
| 2 | 2016-12-11 19:58:55 UTC | trigpoint | Oh, sorry. Just saw it and had to correct it. Maps.me users not bothering with case because they are using a phone has made me much more parricular about grammar in OSM names. | |
| 44215396 by Ausra Ausrele | 1 | 2016-12-11 17:29:57 UTC | trigpoint | Please do not use OSM for personal markers, I am deleting this |
| 44210705 by Melvyn Heath | 1 | 2016-12-11 17:16:34 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.Green Motion car hire is already mapped at Birmingham International, I am removing your duplication. |
| 44218396 by bloodua | 1 | 2016-12-11 17:11:55 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, when I visited Albert Dock, there were no signs in Russian |
| 44325532 by Mike Wilkinson | 1 | 2016-12-11 17:08:39 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, I am removing the unofficial viewing point. It is not something that belongs in a public database |
| 44294298 by JoeNerini1 | 1 | 2016-12-11 12:12:15 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, is Quorn Village Hall really a Town Hall (as in seat of local government). I have been there a few times and would consider it a community centre.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2016-12-11 19:03:31 UTC | JoeNerini1 | Hi Phil,The OpenStreetMap Wiki states that Town Halls "may just serve as a community meeting place" so I feel this classification is appropriate.Thanks,Joe | |
| 3 | 2016-12-15 16:59:00 UTC | SK53 | No this is not an appropriate classification. Use either amenity=village_hall or amenity=community_centre which are the accepted values for such places in the UK, and have been so for at least 6-7 years. | |
| 44308428 by hunter1288y | 1 | 2016-12-10 18:46:38 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, Attack Snooker Club seems a very odd name for a pub. Are you sure it isn't a social club? |
| 2 | 2016-12-20 22:20:02 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's also a duplicate (same mapper) of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4548245699 . | |
| 44263803 by JohnnyCab | 1 | 2016-12-09 13:18:46 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, have you some more details about this ATM? Such as operator, associated object? An ATM without an associated bank, shop is very unusual.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2016-12-10 15:01:48 UTC | JohnnyCab | It's just in the wall of the Cheeky Coffee shop. See https://goo.gl/maps/6bD7TYq9jLM2 | |
| 44253078 by Chris Parker | 1 | 2016-12-08 20:00:00 UTC | trigpoint | Please could you use meaningful comments that state what you have done, Wales is a big place.Thanks Phil |
| 44262070 by Zakspeed | 1 | 2016-12-08 19:20:08 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Please could you capitalise names properly.Thanks |
| 44224738 by Merv Kenward | 1 | 2016-12-08 12:59:22 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.The access tags you have added here seem a little odd. I would expect motor vehicle to be private, only the farmer can use it to access their field. Permissive means there is general permission to access it, but not a right and can be withdrawn.It is a public footpath, so bike... |
| 43767598 by Lightswitchr | 1 | 2016-12-07 00:02:06 UTC | trigpoint | Should be fixed |
| 44160417 by terrencem | 1 | 2016-12-06 18:55:16 UTC | trigpoint | Is this really a public car park? Have you surveyed it. Looking at imagery it looks like it is private parking space for the surounding houses. |
| 20951303 by terrencem | 1 | 2016-12-06 18:52:44 UTC | trigpoint | Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42740901 really 2 lanes, I remember it being quite a narrow single track road and thats certainly how it looks on bing imagery. Did you survey it? |
| 44177724 by 김홍민 | 1 | 2016-12-05 18:21:19 UTC | trigpoint | Please stop adding personal marker to OpenStreetMap, there are no Alpine Huts in London. |
| 2 | 2016-12-06 18:24:31 UTC | trigpoint | Reverting no response again | |
| 44181230 by incognitoburrito | 1 | 2016-12-05 12:59:59 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however we tag disused things as disused:shop, disused:amenity etc. That tells the render not to render them. Changing the name implies there is an object called Empty, which is no the case.Happy mapping, Phil |
| 44181330 by Rabbity | 1 | 2016-12-05 12:50:06 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however you do need to tag the objects you add. As a minimum they will need building=yes, area=yes isn't needed very often.Cheers Phil |
| 44168483 by Cyprus Relax | 1 | 2016-12-04 23:54:43 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, do you have any more detail for this hotel, such as a phone number. Also please could you capitalise names properly, all lowercase means others will have to clean up. |
| 44166646 by Marc2 | 1 | 2016-12-04 23:12:47 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however Tesco Express is already mapped, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223063426. Tesco Express is normally mapped as shop=convienience, supermarket is used for larger shops.I have removed the duplicate. |
| 44158610 by mapping man | 1 | 2016-12-04 17:41:40 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, these artworks look a bit odd. Please can you explain? |
| 2 | 2016-12-04 18:59:30 UTC | mapping man | There are 7 (i could only find 6) artworks located along the cycle path as you enter Winslow. Some more info herehttp://www.rogerperkins.com/sel_work1/winslow.htm | |
| 3 | 2016-12-04 19:32:49 UTC | trigpoint | Thank you, looks interesting.Hope you find number 7.Cheers Phil | |