OSM changeset discussions of trigpoint

Changeset	#	Tmstmp UTC	Contributor	Comment
135948239 by mindracer @ 2023-05-10 18:33	1	2025-07-04 21:22	trigpoint	Is Seafood Shack really operated by Age Concern? I suspect you didn't check all the tags. Cheers Phil
167322549 by Jshaughn @ 2025-06-07 18:19	1	2025-06-29 12:39	LordGarySugar ♦70	Maybe put up some cones or a barrier instead of adding nonsense tags like natural=crevasse?
	2	2025-06-29 13:49	trigpoint	Hello Jshaughn Phil from the Data Working Group here. Openstreetmap is a map of the world and should reflect reality. Changing this for your own ends is considered vandalism I have reverted your edits and added a private tag, this will prevent this driveway being used as a shortcut whilst all...
167991007 by Bobby10901 @ 2025-06-23 08:42 Active block	1	2025-06-23 10:38	trigpoint	Reverted by DWG
167990639 by Bobby10901 @ 2025-06-23 08:33 Active block	1	2025-06-23 10:38	trigpoint	Reverted by DWG
167918308 by Chas Nel @ 2025-06-21 15:13	1	2025-06-22 11:57	trigpoint	Hi Foot=permissive is very unlikey for these urban paths, they should be foot=yes. There is no need for motor vehicle or horse tags on a footway. Cheers Phil
167800753 by AlwynWellington @ 2025-06-18 21:28	1	2025-06-21 18:31	trigpoint	Hello Alwyn from Wem, where the sweet peas grow. My main comment is that you have spelt the name of my hometown wrong, it is Wem, not Wen. That is in the changeset comments and the from and to tags. When you are passing through PM me and maybe join me for a beer. Cheers Phil
	2	2025-06-21 21:05	AlwynWellington ♦58	Phil, thank you for your observation. My sole (and very week) defence is that I fancy myself as a touch typist, but ... I've corrected the mispsellings in the route relations. See: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=19253062&type=relation&map=12.0/52.9186/-2.7723
	3	2025-06-21 21:25	AlwynWellington ♦58	I would appreciate your observations on a point that have been raised. The original comments by others some years ago was whether in Open Street Maps, the top route name should continue as Shropshire Way Main Route (with a resulting automatic "ref" of SWMR. The alternative was to be ...
	4	2025-06-21 21:46	AlwynWellington ♦58	On your last suggestion, I can only say I am most susceptible to joining others for a beer. My work with Shropshire Way is part of finding a workable and walkable route that would join my forebears arriving in these climes between 1850 and 1924 from Kent, Devon and several locations in Scotland. R...
167859535 by shanmugamrs @ 2025-06-20 09:00 Active block	1	2025-06-20 09:52	trigpoint	Hello Shan Phil from the Data Working Group here. Please can you explain these edits and your workflow? What does source=deduce mean? Cheers Phil
167651641 by Dan Hatton @ 2025-06-15 13:33	1	2025-06-15 15:04	Aethonatic ♦10	It'd make more sense to keep a hierarchy system in place for subareas, i.e. admin_level 8 is only a subarea of admin_level 7, which is only a subarea of 6, and so on. So the four countries would be subareas of the United Kingdom, but not any of the counties or civil parishes.
	2	2025-06-15 17:43	Dan Hatton ♦8	I was in two, or maybe three, minds about this. Legally, English parish councils (admin_level 10) derive their existence, powers, and territorial extent directly from legislation by central government (admin_level 2). Anyway, it looks like at least part of what I've done is a big policy no-no...
	3	2025-06-15 20:00	trigpoint	Hi Dan OSM derives the relationship from level 10 being inside a level 6 or 8 inside a level 4 up to being inside a level 2 UK. Cheers Phil
167650856 by Dan Hatton @ 2025-06-15 13:14	1	2025-06-15 17:03	trigpoint	Hi Phil from the Data Working Group here. Please don't do this, the only logical conclusion is that the UK relation version number goes up exponentially. I have removed this and amp planning to remove the others you have added.
	2	2025-06-15 17:37	Dan Hatton ♦8	I think I've only added the one example of the non-standard "townhall" role in a boundary relation (precisely because I wasn't sure it was acceptable practice and was waiting for review before adding any more). But maybe you're talking about some wider set of the things I&#...
	3	2025-06-15 17:42	Dan Hatton ♦8	(In fact it sounds like you're talking about me adding local government admin boundary relations as subareas of the UK admin boundary relation, right?)
	4	2025-06-15 18:26	Dan Hatton ♦8	I was about to say something based on the premise "I need to learn to revert changesets", but from what you've just done, it looks like the method of reverting a changeset is to create a new changeset that does the opposite things, in which case I've caused you a bigger headache ...
	5	2025-06-15 19:53	trigpoint	Hi Dan I was atlking about your additions to the higher admin boundaries. Reverting does just create a new version. We (the data working group) can redact but we only do that for thing that need tags be not seen. The review requested is a bit misleading, it merely sets a flag that someone ma...
167647744 by Dan Hatton @ 2025-06-15 11:58	1	2025-06-15 17:27	trigpoint	Boundary lines are imported from official data and are correct. If they do not match features on the ground it suggests that they were traced without properly aligning imagery. Cheers \|Phil
	2	2025-06-15 21:41	Dan Hatton ♦8	Oof. In that case I'm going to have to revert a lot of my recent changesets. Still, all a good learning experience. (For the rest of this post, I'm kind of thinking out loud - don't feel under any obligation to answer my annoying questions, although I'd be most grateful if...
151601893 by Mauls @ 2024-05-20 21:55	1	2025-06-08 13:19	trigpoint	Due to your dodgy mapping OSMand was trying to sen me on a long diversion as you have rendered Aston by Stone Crossing un-routable by your addition of lift gates (tagging for the renderer?). Please don't do that, level crossing barriers are mapped as and attribute to the level crossing. Please...
	2	2025-06-08 13:25	Mauls ♦28	I didn’t add the highway crossing tag. There is a history feature you can use to check which changeset made an edit.
	3	2025-06-08 14:13	trigpoint	Sorry about that, I should have gone back further. Although the main issue was the lift gates.
	4	2025-06-08 17:01	Mauls ♦28	I don't see it saying anywhere that barrier=lift_gate is not for level crossing barriers. A UK level crossing's lifting barrier gates is literally the picture used to illustrate the tag. Are you trying to tag for a router?
147782474 by Mauls @ 2024-02-22 17:21	1	2025-06-08 13:30	trigpoint	Same dodgy mapping as at Stone
166815657 by Kaduna @ 2025-05-27 09:28	1	2025-05-30 11:52	trigpoint	Hello Describing a garage forecourt as a pedestrian highway is a little odd is it not? There was nothing wron with the existing highway=service area=yes. Cheers Phi
	2	2025-05-30 12:13	Kaduna ♦20	Hi trigpoint, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
	3	2025-06-05 04:15	Kaduna ♦20	Hi trigpoint, Thank you for reaching out. I have made the necessary changes to tag the area as a service road again. However while analysing the issue I have seen that if area=yes is to be used with highway=service, they mostly happen to be for designated service areas. There also were not other pe...
166663584 by J A Agriculture @ 2025-05-23 16:01	1	2025-05-25 11:20	trigpoint	This is a PROW crossing, not a road. I have restored it to the map.
166661981 by J A Agriculture @ 2025-05-23 15:21	1	2025-05-24 01:26	JezCrow ♦150	Hi J A Agriculture, welcome to OpenStreetMap. You state this is a false line, but it still appears on Shropshire's Rights of Way map as a Restricted Byway - has it been diverted or extinguished recently?
	2	2025-05-25 10:08	trigpoint	There are no curent path orders for Whitchurch Rural. This edit has removed a valid Restricted Byway. I am reverting these edits. The crossing is clearly not intended for vehicles so will update from track to bridleway.
162866713 by ol0n0lo @ 2025-02-23 19:44	1	2025-02-24 16:23	DorneyLake123 ♦25	Hello, what prompted you to make this change, along with changing the [boundary] and [admin_level] for the regions or councils in Berkshire in your changeset_count 271 through 278?
	2	2025-03-02 23:19	vricciardulli ♦13	I'm also wondering why these changes were made. In particular, for the places tagged with designation=unitary_authority applying admin_level=8 is in contrast with what this guide says https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#admin_level.3D.2A_Country_specific_values\...
	3	2025-05-15 07:47	trigpoint	Still no response so reverted. The level 6 authorities had been restored earlier.
165999133 by Blue Clip @ 2025-05-08 19:02	1	2025-05-09 17:51	joel56dt ♦170	Hi Blue Chip, Are these post_office=post_partner locations Canada Post locations? It's unclear to me what post network they are associated with or how they are different from amenity=post_office in Canada. It might be helpful if you could offer your thoughts into the ongoing forum thread ab...
	2	2025-05-11 12:27	Blue Clip ♦10	https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/8294734202 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:post_office%3Dpost_partner
	3	2025-05-11 14:12	trigpoint	https://www.canadapost-postescanada.ca/cpc/en/support/kb/company-policies/terms-conditions/legal-terms-of-use-and-conditions says effectively that the site is for personal use so therefore does not include adding to OSM which is licensed to be used for any purpose.
	4	2025-05-12 15:13	joel56dt ♦170	Hi Blue Clip, I would really appreciate if you can join the discussion on the forum. My least favourite part of OSM is when users work against each other in their mapping efforts and I am concerned this could be happening here because of a disagreement/misunderstanding in how these post offices shou...
	5	2025-05-14 08:57	Blue Clip ♦10	LGW delete?
	6	2025-05-14 09:11	Blue Clip ♦10	https://www.google.com/maps/place/Canada+Post/@49.2746979,-123.1309996,20z/data=!4m8!3m7!1s0x548673ff2a40b765:0x681a11a1dd0fa9aa!8m2!3d49.27467!4d-123.1310755!9m1!1b1!16s%2Fg%2F11kphlpz9c?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDUxMS4wIKXMDSoJLDEwMjExNDU1SAFQAw%3D%3D Negative full.
	7	2025-05-14 09:12	Blue Clip ♦10	https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada_Post https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lcOL5ISS9aML6oaUOcgyngw4bio_gRmbxzLn-4GCjXQ/edit?gid=0#gid=0
	8	2025-05-14 09:18	trigpoint	Google Maps, as you have linked above is absolutely not allowed as a source in OSM. These edits will need to be reverted.
	9	2025-05-14 11:42	Blue Clip ♦10	Google Maps not used source. Now to show not full.
	10	2025-05-14 11:45	Blue Clip ♦10	Report bully trigpoint
	11	2025-05-14 11:51	trigpoint	Merely asking the source of these edits.
	12	2025-05-14 12:39	Blue Clip ♦10	No.Aggressive. Accuse.
	13	2025-05-14 12:42	Blue Clip ♦10	No question https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165999133#c1436046
	14	2025-05-14 12:42	Blue Clip ♦10	Please revert all my changes, you no longer have consent to use my edits.
	15	2025-05-14 13:13	woodpeck ♦2,430	Hello Blue Clip, a decision on whether or not to revert your changes is going to be based on license compatibility, not on your consent or your withdrawing thereof. If English is not your native language, feel free to explain yourself in a language you feel more comfortable with.
	16	2025-05-14 13:29	Blue Clip ♦10	LWG https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group/Minutes/2023-08-14#Ticket#2023081110000064_%E2%80%94_First_party_websites_as_sources
165979711 by Blue Clip @ 2025-05-08 12:00	1	2025-05-10 19:45	trigpoint	What is the source of this post partner edit? Cheers Phil
	2	2025-05-11 12:00	Blue Clip ♦10	https://www.anpost.com/Store-Locator/Gavins
	3	2025-05-11 12:21	trigpoint	Did you obtain permission to reproduce that information as otherwise you are in breach of the terms of use for the website.
	4	2025-05-11 12:24	trigpoint	https://www.anpost.com/Terms-of-Use particularly paragraph 3.
	5	2025-05-11 12:55	trigpoint	Openstreetmap can only use opendat, or data we have specific permission to use. The obvious gold standard is 'I went there and I saw it'. Just because something is on a website intended for personal use does not make it opendata.
165622504 by Blue Clip @ 2025-04-30 07:57	1	2025-05-10 19:22	trigpoint	Hello Welcome to OSM. We don't use post partner in the UK, post offices within small shops are considered post offices, you can do most of what you can in a larger post office so they really should be amenity=post_office. They are standalone counters within the shop, usually with their o...
	2	2025-05-11 12:02	Blue Clip ♦10	brand=Costcutter + amenity=post_office?
	3	2025-05-11 12:02	Blue Clip ♦10	standalone counters?
	4	2025-05-11 12:42	trigpoint	"brand=Costcutter + amenity=post_office?" Yes if you are mapping them as a single node. More correctly the shop should be mapped as an area with a post office node inside it. "standalone counters" The counter are separate. You do not wait to pay for a few beers behind someon...
165889103 by Blue Clip @ 2025-05-06 12:16	1	2025-05-11 12:06	trigpoint	Hi Have you really fixed this? You have removed a shop tag but given no explanation of why. Did you go to Paris and stand outside? Alos where did you magic the check_date from? Cheers Phil
	2	2025-05-11 14:24	Blue Clip ♦10	http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/822953740 shop=grocery July 18, 2010. amenity=restaurant December 16, 2021 Bad forgotten removal shop=grocery.
	3	2025-05-11 14:24	Blue Clip ♦10	Please be not mean, stop
165262580 by Numbergod @ 2025-04-22 01:21	1	2025-04-30 01:19	Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦596	Please attach speed cameras to the road. Or create a maxspeed enforcement relation. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
	2	2025-05-04 15:27	trigpoint	You also changed a Chinese Restaurant into a pub, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248378684/history/4, I assume because Rapid told you too. Such changes require a mapper to put their brain in gear and carefully review each suggested change. This often requires local knowledge and other sources. W...
	3	2025-05-06 08:30	Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660	https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-automated-edit-removal-of-crossing-markings-yes-tags-introduced-in-undiscussed-automated-edits/129614 is proposing to mass revert your edits due to mass automated, unreviewed and wrong editing
164631276 by pmpjoseph @ 2025-04-07 12:11	1	2025-04-14 21:01	trigpoint	Bore da What is the source of this name? Diolch Phil
	2	2025-04-14 21:04	LordGarySugar ♦70	Hi, is the bus stop actually signed as 'Pringles' here or did you name it after the existing car park? I was trying to work out if Pringles is a common short name of James Pringle Weavers or if the bus stop should actually be named after Llanfairpwll station?
	3	2025-04-15 07:08	pmpjoseph ♦1	Yes its called pringles on the bus stop sign - pringles is what the locals refer to james pringle weavers as
	4	2025-04-15 07:12	pmpjoseph ♦1	It seems like all documentation online says its llanfair pg station, but in person the stop is named 'pringles'
	5	2025-04-18 15:11	LordGarySugar ♦70	Ok, thanks. We were discussing it and thought it was funny!
164875085 by beatpoet @ 2025-04-12 23:06	1	2025-04-13 09:36	rskedgell ♦1,478	Unfortunately, using your own preferred format for prow_ref breaks things like https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/essex/uttlesford/great-dunmow/
	2	2025-04-13 12:07	rskedgell ♦1,478	Apologies, I see you expanded the abbreviation in ref=, not prow_ref=
	3	2025-04-13 12:28	trigpoint	Although the ref tag should only be used if signed on the ground, which is very unusual. Cheers Phil
164473483 by phom_ @ 2025-04-03 16:24	1	2025-04-11 15:09	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	Hello, I've filled in a gap in the National Forest Way at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3748275#map=17/52.667166/-1.311819 . Does that look OK? Best Regards, Andy
	2	2025-04-11 15:15	phom_ ♦1	that's great thanks, mine were very rough!
	3	2025-04-11 19:26	trigpoint	Hello Andy asked me to use my local knowledge and look at his fix to the Leicestershire Round. What I have spotted is that you have changed the track around the reservoir to a footway. This isn't really accurate, it can be used by service vehicles and mobility scooters. Footway implies someth...
	4	2025-04-11 19:44	phom_ ♦1	Ah apologies, I misunderstood the definitions. Would you like me to restore them or are you guys sorting that? Tom
	5	2025-04-11 21:23	trigpoint	Hi Tom I am happy to fix it. There are a few other things I can fix at the same time. Cheers Phil
	6	2025-04-12 07:00	phom_ ♦1	Hi Phil Just letting you know I have reverted it back to a track, but feel free to double check and fix those other things Tom
	7	2025-04-12 12:17	trigpoint	Hi Tom Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12716223148 really a kissing gate blocking the entire track? A kissing gate alongside a vehicle gate seems much more likely. Thanks Phil
	8	2025-04-12 14:37	phom_ ♦1	Yes, you are correct. Should it be mapped as two separate nodes or just the one? Apologies for any mistakes, I'm still relatively new to all this, so feel free to keep correcting me! Thanks Tom
134071214 by JasmineRanasinghe @ 2023-03-24 14:34	1	2025-03-19 16:32	trigpoint	Hello I know this edit was mad 2 years ago but if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33478285 is oneway and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159381827 is private how do customers get out? Cheers Phil
109302019 by TrekClimbing @ 2021-08-07 09:37	1	2025-03-14 12:53	trigpoint	Hello Cash withdrawal fee is a very odd tag for a campsite, I assume it was meant to be something else? Cheers Phil
	2	2025-03-14 22:43	TrekClimbing ♦60	So it is. Not sure what that was about. At a guess it auto completed after I started typing campsite to add the subtag and then looked at the wiki and either forgot or decided against using it, or I was trying to say you paid in cash only and messed up, but I can't remember. I've removed i...
	3	2025-03-14 23:15	trigpoint	Thank you. Looks a nice site.
163585919 by ~lu @ 2025-03-13 19:46	1	2025-03-14 11:23	trigpoint	Hi Welcome to OSM. We do not generally add proposed features until construction has began. Proposals are likely to change or may never happen. Also what is the license of the official plans you are copying? Please can you provide a link. Cheers Phil (OSMF Data Working Group)
	2	2025-03-23 18:28	BER319 ♦106	Hallo lu, was sollen die ganzen Löschungen hier? What's the point of all these deletions here? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163585919 BER319
163573127 by Anon5374527 @ 2025-03-13 14:28	1	2025-03-13 16:00	trigpoint	Hello Anon The population tag for the Leicester node should be the population of the city. The value you have added is the population of Greater Leicester which inlcudes Oadby, Wigston and Glenfield which are in the county. The wikipedia is confusing. Cheers Phil
163001533 by Wendi F @ 2025-02-27 08:09	1	2025-03-03 21:40	trigpoint	Reverted in 163178856
163001543 by Wendi F @ 2025-02-27 08:09	1	2025-03-03 21:40	trigpoint	Reverted in 163178856
163001551 by Wendi F @ 2025-02-27 08:09	1	2025-03-03 21:40	trigpoint	Reverted in 163178856
163001564 by Wendi F @ 2025-02-27 08:10	1	2025-02-28 15:42	trigpoint	Hi Wendi Phil from the Data Working Group here. I am wondering what sources are you using for these edits? Bessborough Gardens is a public park so tagging this path as private seems unlikely. Cheers Phil
	2	2025-03-03 21:40	trigpoint	Reverted in 163178856
163001572 by Wendi F @ 2025-02-27 08:10	1	2025-02-27 08:50	rskedgell ♦1,478	In what sense in Bessborough Gardens, which appears to be a public park operated by Westminster City Council, private? https://www.westminster.gov.uk/parks-and-open-spaces/bessborough-gardens
	2	2025-03-03 21:39	trigpoint	Reverted in 163178856
163178856 by trigpoint @ 2025-03-03 21:38	1	2025-03-03 21:39	trigpoint	Reverted in changeset 163178856
163113856 by AlainPhilippe14 @ 2025-03-02 09:31 Active block	1	2025-03-02 11:32	trigpoint	Bonjour Alain Phil du groupe de travail sur les données ici. Dans cet ensemble de modifications, vous avez supprimé un très grand nombre de nœuds d'adresse, ce qui a perdu beaucoup de données importantes. Je me demande pourquoi?
	2	2025-03-02 12:15	AlainPhilippe14 Active block	Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
	3	2025-03-02 13:38	trigpoint	Merci Alain Tout d'abord, je ne suis pas convaincu que la suppression des données existantes soit la bonne façon de procéder, avez-vous discuté de cette modification avant de commencer? Nous préférons que les nouvelles données soient confondues ...
	4	2025-03-02 14:33	AlainPhilippe14 Active block	Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
	5	2025-03-02 15:38	trigpoint	Merci Alain Plus de questions que de réponses. Qui vous a formé à l'utilisation de josm? Où se trouvent les nœuds de remplacement de ceux que vous avez supprimés? Qui est l'organisateur de ce projet? Y a-t-il une page wiki qui détaill...
163117020 by AlainPhilippe14 @ 2025-03-02 11:16 Active block	1	2025-03-02 11:47	trigpoint	Encore une fois, beaucoup de nœuds d'adresse ont été supprimés, pourquoi? Phil
	2	2025-03-02 12:28	AlainPhilippe14 Active block	Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
162923294 by AlainPhilippe14 @ 2025-02-25 09:18 Active block	1	2025-03-02 11:35	trigpoint	Qu'est-ce que le projet cd14?
155698436 by gg4om @ 2024-08-24 14:05	1	2025-02-27 13:49	trigpoint	https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12133938342#map=16/52.16930/-3.90377 is a very odd place for a toll gantry. What is actually here? Cheers Phil
	2	2025-02-27 16:00	gg4om ♦2	Hi Phil, The "toll gantry" is not one of my additions. I guess it was already there on the service road - which I did adjust slightly, following the aerial-view in the editor. The road needed to be re-aligned when I added some buildings there. I strongly suspect it's an error! As...
161949329 by Ivory Dental Arts and Implant Center @ 2025-01-30 18:45 Active block	1	2025-02-16 08:51	trigpoint	Reverted in changeset 162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .
161973993 by Ivory Dental Arts and Implant Center @ 2025-01-31 11:43 Active block	1	2025-02-16 08:51	trigpoint	Reverted in changeset 162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .
162011001 by Ivory Dental Arts and Implant Center @ 2025-02-01 13:33 Active block	1	2025-02-16 08:51	trigpoint	Reverted in changeset 162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .
162151594 by Ivory Dental Arts and Implant Center @ 2025-02-05 06:12 Active block	1	2025-02-16 08:50	trigpoint	Reverted in changeset 162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .
162174995 by Ivory Dental Arts and Implant Center @ 2025-02-05 17:30 Active block	1	2025-02-16 08:50	trigpoint	Reverted in changeset 162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .
162557918 by Ivory Dental Arts and Implant Center @ 2025-02-16 03:53 Active block	1	2025-02-16 08:50	trigpoint	Reverted in changeset 162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .
153467823 by ceirios @ 2024-07-02 17:24	1	2025-02-12 21:51	trigpoint	Hi Ceirios The names of long distance footpaths are not put on the individual ways. They belong on the route relation, which already exists in this case. These way also form part of The Wales Coastpath relation. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/77964 Cheers Phil
	2	2025-02-12 22:18	ceirios ♦48	Hi! Thanks for letting me know - I wasn't aware of this at the time. I just remember there were some bits with names and some without. Cofion Ceirios
	3	2025-02-12 23:06	trigpoint	No problem. Andy Townsends maps show relation names along with prow_ref which are useful for rights of way in England and Wales, carto misses these things. Cheers Phil
162298889 by @@@21 @ 2025-02-09 00:40 Active block	1	2025-02-09 01:23	trigpoint	This edit has been fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account
162298906 by @@@21 @ 2025-02-09 00:41 Active block	1	2025-02-09 01:22	trigpoint	This edit has been fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account
162298979 by @@@21 @ 2025-02-09 00:48 Active block	1	2025-02-09 01:22	trigpoint	This edit has been fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account
162297567 by @@@21 @ 2025-02-08 23:11 Active block	1	2025-02-09 01:22	trigpoint	This edit has been fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account
162298815 by @@@21 @ 2025-02-09 00:35 Active block	1	2025-02-09 01:22	trigpoint	This edit has been fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account
162298859 by @@@21 @ 2025-02-09 00:38 Active block	1	2025-02-09 01:21	trigpoint	This edit has been fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account
162299081 by @@@21 @ 2025-02-09 01:00 Active block	1	2025-02-09 01:21	trigpoint	This edit has been fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account
	2	2025-02-09 22:06	Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,069	Thanks for monitoring and quick fix.
162257710 by Yohaan78 @ 2025-02-07 19:03	1	2025-02-07 19:37	trigpoint	Hola Phil del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos aquí. Sus ediciones han sido marcadas como sospechosas y, al investigar, he descubierto que ha eliminado un gran número de edificios. Por favor, no lo hagas, es una falta de respeto a otros mapeadores cuyo trabajo y tiempo estás d...
161678411 by sfkdy @ 2025-01-23 15:10	1	2025-01-23 16:33	trigpoint	Hi Which OS maps have you used as a source for these edits? Cheers Phil
	2	2025-01-28 14:38	sfkdy ♦1	Hi I pay for the premium so if you log in it's just the OS website or app and you can see it as standard/premium/satellite. It's cheap for the year. I also visit the site in person, that’s how I know the summits are incorrect as they don’t match up with the map as I’m...
	3	2025-01-28 15:40	trigpoint	Hi Surveying objects for OpenStreetMap is fine, if you are there and capture a GPS trace, that is the gold standard and you should use that in OSM. We can also use out of copyright OSM maps, which are available as leyers in josm. What we cannot do is use premium OS maps as these are not opendata ...
161573831 by jpritchard_isl @ 2025-01-20 18:17	1	2025-01-23 16:19	trigpoint	Hello Welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits, I am however concerned as to why you have added maxheight=below_default to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1352970613 ? This is a major road (former ring road) and has no sign so surely this should be default? Cheers Phil
	2	2025-01-24 12:22	jpritchard_isl ♦1	I agree, my mistake
	3	2025-01-24 12:34	trigpoint	Thank you
161290275 by hlo281 @ 2025-01-12 22:46	1	2025-01-23 11:32	TonyS999 ♦17	The road has now reopened from its temporary closure - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czdly32qzrvo Will you now be updating the map?
	2	2025-01-23 15:39	trigpoint	Hi hlo281 We do not update the map for closures as short a this one. Many consumers only take data periodically so unless a closure is measured in months the map shouldn't be updated.
161643837 by dougfranca @ 2025-01-22 15:57	1	2025-01-23 15:31	trigpoint	Tenho alguns comentários sobre este conjunto de alterações. Em primeiro lugar, você desenhou uma praia dupilcada, uma praia duplicada em cima de uma praia existente, que ignora as características existentes. Em segundo lugar, o nome parece improvável e &e...
	2	2025-01-23 16:52	dougfranca ♦1	Quanto a área selecionada, provavelmente eu me equivoquei desenhando uma praia em cima da outra, mas seria apenas pra demarcar o local. Qual seria o tipo de tag recomendada pra o uso dessa marcação? Quanto ao nome, é conhecido localmente por todos os moradores da regi...
160400248 by Towig @ 2024-12-19 15:43	1	2025-01-13 12:54	trigpoint	Hi What is the purpose of removing tags from the way and creating a node? They are better on the way. Cheers Phil
161273046 by Towig @ 2025-01-12 13:35	1	2025-01-13 11:13	trigpoint	Hello Towig Phil from the Data Working Group here. We are not allowed to use the Warrington planning maps as they are copyright and we do not have permission to use such data. Cheers Phil
155898153 by jonnymccullagh @ 2024-08-28 19:43	1	2024-10-25 22:04	Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,069	Why are you using an untested editor on the live map?
	2	2024-10-25 22:39	jonnymccullagh ♦11	why do you have an emoji in your username ?
	3	2025-01-05 20:13	trigpoint	Hi Jonny Phil from the Data Working Group here. Whilst you have answered a question with a question you have not answered the initial important question. You are using an editor called YourAppName, which others have used (at least an editor with the same name) resulting in breaking existing...
	4	2025-01-05 21:18	jonnymccullagh ♦11	I already replied to Clifford Snow of the Data Working Group in a DM.
159588284 by Curious3531 @ 2024-11-25 20:15	1	2024-12-26 18:00	trigpoint	Hi Please can you explain what is incorrect about the node you removed? Please use meaningful comment that describe the changes you have made and why so that other mappers can understand you changes. Cheers Phil (OSMF Data Working Group)
160219674 by I-Izzo @ 2024-12-12 18:50	1	2024-12-13 09:46	trigpoint	Hi Since when has this area been been part of Manchester? Cheers Phil
159777764 by kfc742820 @ 2024-11-30 15:22 Active block	1	2024-11-30 16:01	trigpoint	Reverted, changing concrete and asphalt to paved is losing data.
159726577 by The_CopyNinja @ 2024-11-29 04:52	1	2024-11-30 10:20	citrula ♦857	I have reverted this edit because you have added this business to the entire building. Please add it as a point in the correct location instead. Let me know if you have any questions ! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159768570
	2	2024-11-30 10:26	Le_Sharkoïste ♦64	Did someone pay you to post this
	3	2024-11-30 11:34	trigpoint	And please keep your changeset comments precise and describe what you have changed. In this case 'Added a restaurant'. Mappers do not have to wade through a pile of spammy verbal diarrhea.
159193670 by Edmonds College Plant Map @ 2024-11-16 03:41	1	2024-11-16 03:44	NeisBot ♦2,322	Hi Edmonds College Plant Map, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 21 highway(s) Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they oc...
	2	2024-11-16 13:39	trigpoint	This has been reverted under Ticket#2024111610000074 — suspicious activity of user Edmonds College Plant Map. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159202716
151242259 by DankJae @ 2024-05-12 21:01	1	2024-05-12 21:03	DankJae ♦17	Since being rebranded in TfW colours, it was Abermaw under Arriva I think.
	2	2024-11-13 21:04	trigpoint	It was, the town still is Abermaw. Confused me when I first saw Y Bermo on the sign
51177880 by msevilla00 @ 2017-08-16 14:42	1	2024-11-12 13:42	trigpoint	Rugby League is a bit unlikely here, are you sure? Cheers Phil
	2	2025-04-27 09:49	msevilla00 ♦136	I changed to simply sport=rugby Cheers
158900964 by ruqsar @ 2024-11-08 15:45	1	2024-11-09 20:30	trigpoint	Hi Are you sure about this edit. Do you have any evidence beyond 4 year old streetside imagery. Streetside shows only a temporary restrictions, the temporary signs and the signs here https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=52.640128%7E-1.10771&lvl=18.8&pi=-14.9&style=x&mo=om.1&dir=148 s...
158830932 by Fiddlers Elbow @ 2024-11-06 19:41	1	2024-11-07 13:25	trigpoint	Thank you for your edit. I have corrected the phonenumber to international format and website to https. Cheers Phil
158742079 by mohamed567 @ 2024-11-04 14:02	1	2024-11-04 14:33	Martin Constantino–Bodin ♦120	Hi, This object probably wasn't meant to be within this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/749434096 Can you double-check that your changes on it are fine? Thanks in advance.
	2	2024-11-04 15:23	trigpoint	Hello This edit has gone rather wrong. Whilst the focus of the HOT task is mapping in India, you have created a globe spanning changeset where you have damaged the geometry of a road in Haverfordwest and added a node to a farm. I have reverted the UK parts of this edit. Cheers Phil
158741488 by Maccabee @ 2024-11-04 13:49	1	2024-11-04 15:21	trigpoint	Hello This edit has gone rather wrong. Whilst the focus of the HOT task is mapping in India, you have created a globe spanning changeset where you have moved a cafe in Swansea and for some reason traced a house. I have reverted the UK parts of this edit. Cheers Phil
158598461 by Canalsman @ 2024-10-31 21:24	1	2024-11-04 13:31	trigpoint	Hi What on the ground evidence do you have for using the term Shropshire Union. It may have been the company that built it 200 years ago but in my time in Shropshire and as an active Ramblers officer, I have never heard anyone use this term. Maybe put it in old name? Cheers Phil
	2	2024-11-04 19:57	Canalsman ♦4	Hi Phil Thanks for your observation. Just to explain better I've been a canal enthusiast for about 60 years and I've always had a particular interest in abandoned canals. The Shrewsbury Canal was the original name but it, and its branch to Newport, were absorbed by the Shropshire ...
158702345 by PK512 @ 2024-11-03 14:40	1	2024-11-03 14:42	NeisBot ♦2,322	Hi PK512, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 1 highway(s) Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake? ...
	2	2024-11-03 14:55	PK512 ♦2	This was intentional as all the paths were now closed down trails. The highway attribute must been wrong in the past, as this in in the middle of a forest.
	3	2024-11-03 15:11	trigpoint	Hello PK512, Phil from the Data Working Group here. If the trails are not authorised then they should be tagged as private, not simply deleted. If they exist removing them is considered vandalism and the other effect is another mapper is going to re-add them.
	4	2024-11-03 15:22	PK512 ♦2	Most of the trails are closed down by the local authorities due to being in nature reserve. And at least the entries but for most trails the whole path is blocked/destroyed or renaturalized. I think a deletion is in line with the real world
	5	2024-11-03 16:56	pitscheplatsch ♦5,396	Thank you for your reply. Which nature reserve do you mean exactly? After a quick check of the map of the Bundesamt für Naturschutz, I couldn't find a protected area for this changeset or the deleted paths. The following way is an exception and was correctly tagged: https://www.opens...
	6	2024-11-04 13:10	woodpeck_repair ♦33,903	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158739903 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen von Wegen rückgängig gemacht. Diskussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wegeloschungen-markischer-kreis-nahe-iserlohn/121121
	7	2024-11-04 13:12	woodpeck ♦2,430	Ich habe die Löschungen jetzt erst einmal revertiert. Damit sage ich nicht, dass sie definitiv falsch sind - sie sollten aber vorher diskutiert werden, und wie schon anderswo angedeutet, ist manchmal vielleicht auch die Änderung von access-Tags der korrekte(re) Weg.
158433143 by WillFR130 @ 2024-10-27 21:56	1	2024-10-28 11:07	trigpoint	Hi Please do not misuse the name tag for descriptions. Most phoneboxes don't have a name, so shouldn't have a name tag. Cheers Phil
	2	2024-10-28 20:12	WillFR130 ♦7	Hi Phil Thanks for pointing that mistake out. I did not mean to type "Telephone Box" in the name section of OSMand. It was a simple mistake while chatting to someone. I will add however in rural Wales most phoneboxes do have individual names written inside. Usually relating to the nea...
	3	2024-10-29 10:16	trigpoint	Hi Will Phoneboxes have a descriptive location, to be used when making emergency calls. That could be mapped, I am not sure if there is a tag for it but it is certainly not the name tag. We certainly map the phonenumber. I noticed that you have add disused:amenity to this object, yet amenity=pho...
158175044 by spughetti @ 2024-10-21 15:13	1	2024-10-23 09:42	lipuma ♦176	Mooi gedaan! Hoe doe je zo iets in JOSM, de tags van een bepaalde winkel of andere POI gelijk maken, weet jij of dat ergens goed beschreven staat?
	2	2024-10-23 11:11	spughetti ♦107	Thanks! Ik download ze meestal via overpass, vanuit daar kan je uit het tags menu de tag die je wil veranderen dubbel klikken en die in alle objecten gelijk maken. Het is handig om tijdens dit proces met filters te werken om maar een type feature tegelijk te veranderen. (type:node, type:way, t...
	3	2024-10-28 11:47	trigpoint	How is removing the brand:wikipedia tag standardising anything or in any way helpful? Cheers Phil
	4	2024-10-28 12:02	spughetti ♦107	Hey Phil, I don't recall removing brand:wikipedia tags, if I did it must've been a mistake, on what feature(s) did this happen?
	5	2024-10-28 12:08	trigpoint	Sorry, you added it. My mistake. Cheers Phil
	6	2024-10-28 12:35	trigpoint	Although an automated edit such as this should have been discussed with the local community, if so can you point me to that discussion? Cheers Phil
	7	2024-10-28 13:14	spughetti ♦107	I can't think of any reason why someone would oppose fixing spelling mistakes and adding Wikidata/Wikipedia tags so I generally don't discuss these edits
	8	2024-10-28 19:04	trigpoint	At least one member of the UK community (not me) did question whether wikipedia tags is necessary when there is a wikidata tag. That does make not imposing a language through wikipedia simpler. Cheers Phil
	9	2024-10-28 19:21	spughetti ♦107	Wikipedia tags are well established in OSM. And afaik it's common practice to use the national language article of the country the feature lies within, in this case English.
	10	2024-10-28 20:03	trigpoint	The national language in Wales is English?
	11	2024-10-28 20:09	spughetti ♦107	English and Welsh.
	12	2024-11-10 19:51	EqualBoat1886 ♦4	https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/brand:wikipedia#chronology
	13	2024-11-10 20:04	spughetti ♦107	What are you trying to say with this graph?
134067800 by Nasucbelit88 @ 2023-03-24 13:20	1	2024-10-21 13:17	trigpoint	Hello, welcome to OSM. Please bear in mind that in OSM we map ground truth. Speed limits are a legal maximum, not a target. Please do not change them because you think they are a bit high, the speed limit matches what the sign at the edge of the zone says. Also why did you change the speed li...
157960826 by RaccoonFederation @ 2024-10-16 11:45	1	2024-10-16 12:09	trigpoint	The defibrillator at the railway ststion is definitely accessible 24/7. Why wouldn't it be? Cheers Phil
	2	2024-10-16 13:03	RaccoonFederation ♦96	If this is an area you know please go ahead and set the tags. I was reversing some edits made using Pic4Review which uses Mapillary images. There is no way of telling from those images if it is accessible when the station is closed.
	3	2024-10-16 13:17	trigpoint	Whilst I know this station well, it is never closed. However that is also true for most stations in the GB. Only a few big, always staffed, stations ever close. Cheers Phil
	4	2024-10-16 14:05	trigpoint	I have re-added the 24/7 however the mapillary image is totally wrong, wrong side of tracks.
157853155 by Railwayfan2005 @ 2024-10-13 21:50	1	2024-10-14 09:53	lostmike ♦65	I'm not sure that amenity=biergarten is valid here. To quote from the WIKI: "To be clear, a biergarten is not the same as (what is known in the UK as) a "beer garden", i.e., an outside area associated with a pub."
	2	2024-10-14 18:38	Railwayfan2005 ♦25	What's the correct tag for a beer garden?
	3	2024-10-14 19:32	lostmike ♦65	It's, complicated. Here is a good start though.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:outdoor_seating I usually use acmbination of: leisure=outdoor_seating outdoor_seating=garden
	4	2024-10-14 23:10	Railwayfan2005 ♦25	https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity specifically says "Biergarten or beer garden is an open-air area where alcoholic beverages along with food is prepared and served. See also the description of the tags amenity=pub;bar;restaurant. A biergarten can commonly be found attached ...
	5	2024-10-15 06:59	lostmike ♦65	I think it's been proosed before . Not sure of the process for this though.
	6	2024-10-15 09:42	trigpoint	A biergarten, as many of us visited I. Germany, is a very different thing to a British pub beer garden and the tagging should be kept separate. A biergarten is usually a standalone object, not an outside area of a pub. As lostmike says British beer gardens are best covered using the outside se...
	7	2024-10-15 10:05	murble ♦26	Does it actually operate as a biergarten, e.g. separate business that sells beer, typically with table service ,outside in a garten, rather than an outdoor seating area for a bar or pub? in the uk we typically do the seperate seating area tagging, although also had amenity=beer_garden which doesn&#...
	8	2024-10-15 20:33	Railwayfan2005 ♦25	I've changed it to amenity=beer_garden
157832527 by Lapang Mini Soccer Permata Biru @ 2024-10-13 12:21	1	2024-10-14 09:43	trigpoint	Halo Selamat datang di osm. Dalam changeset ini Anda telah menyeret node yang telah mendistorsi beberapa jalan yang ada. Harap berhati-hati saat memetakan dan memeriksa perubahan Anda sebelum menyimpannya. Bersulang Phil from the OSMF Data Working Group Hello Welcome to osm. In this chan...
156142382 by Rhydian Wilson @ 2024-09-03 13:16	1	2024-09-21 15:45	trigpoint	Bore da Rhydian In this edit you have changed way 1184798599 into a bridge for its entire length. You need to split the way for the section that is a bridge, you have also made the entire length of way 24624348 into a culvert, you again need to split the way at the point it is a culvert although th...
	2	2024-10-05 11:41	trigpoint	Mapper has still not responded so have fixed
157308506 by dmich9 @ 2024-09-30 17:35	1	2024-09-30 17:42	Wynndale ♦54	What are you trying to do?
	2	2024-09-30 17:46	dmich9 ♦37	This changeset simplifies elements with excessively high amounts of nodes - for example - silo imports with hundreds of nodes forming a circle, when 20 nodes is just fine. Or, there were some straight lines with thousands of nodes, that were replaced with 2 or 3. It is a quality assurance change set...
	3	2024-09-30 22:58	rskedgell ♦1,478	When and where was this automated edit discussed?
	4	2024-09-30 23:03	dmich9 ♦37	This is not an automated edit. I did this by hand
	5	2024-10-01 05:56	rskedgell ♦1,478	The Automated Edits Code of Conduct may disagree with you here. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct "This policy also applies to substantial changes made using 'find and replace' or similar functions within standard editors such as JOSM." &q...
	6	2024-10-01 06:27	Metzor ♦369	Hi all Neis one is able to vizualize quite fast: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157308506 What is your evidence for deleting this building? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622185354/history See also: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157308506#21/-23.48279...
	7	2024-10-01 10:15	trigpoint	@dmich9 Please can you describe the process used to detect these buildings over such a large area? Phil Barnes (OSMF Data Working Group)
	8	2024-10-01 10:43	dmich9 ♦37	Hey all. Nearly all of these features were part of a discussion on the #questionable-edits section of the OSM discord. I noticed that even though they were posted as being excessively high, way more nodes then necessary, none of the features were actually fixed. So, I went post by post, opening them...
157186059 by MatthewM @ 2024-09-27 19:36	1	2024-10-01 10:05	trigpoint	Hi Matthew You have missed the name tag. I assume it is Bombos. As a cuisine Asian seems a bit vague. Cheers Phil
	2	2024-10-01 13:00	MatthewM ♦3	Thanks Phil. Yes, first time I have submitted anything via Organic Maps and I noticed it then showed the street address rather than the name. And it only gives you a limited list of food types. Forgot to investigate - will check on desktop site.
125173153 by Ste_Nova @ 2022-08-21 08:34	1	2024-09-27 09:32	trigpoint	The car parks accept payment by apple pay but not normal cards? Cheers Phil
157054452 by trigpoint @ 2024-09-24 19:36	1	2024-09-25 01:37	InsertUser ♦446	This seems to have affected quite a few relations as well as the two buildings. Were the relation edits meant to have a different changeset comment?
	2	2024-09-25 11:27	fortera_au ♦1,070	Relation edits appear to be a reversion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157015889
	3	2024-09-25 11:47	trigpoint	Whoops, my mistake didn't clear josm first. I have reverted this
	4	2024-09-25 12:06	fortera_au ♦1,070	Yeah I guessed it was an accident, thanks for fixing it up!
154233248 by hexplore @ 2024-07-21 19:05	1	2024-09-22 17:42	trigpoint	Hi What is the copyright on Haringey Council's map of watercourses? Do you have a link to it? Cheers Phil
	2	2024-09-22 20:37	trigpoint	Actually found it but you do not seem to have specified that you want to publish this information on osm and that it is provided for your personal use not as open data which is needed for publishing in OSM. Cheers Phil
	3	2024-09-23 11:09	hexplore ♦9	Hi Phil, No actual data from the council's map is present in this changeset. The route of the brook as shown is an interpretation of the courses shown in their map, formed of a patchwork of that, mentions of culverts in Haringey's flood investigation reports (e.g. "the 1013mm diame...
156907718 by WillFR130 @ 2024-09-21 11:29	1	2024-09-21 11:40	trigpoint	Bore da You seem to have 2 contradictory name: and name:cy tags here. Is the name:en verifiable, or just a translation? Diolch Phil
	2	2024-09-21 19:48	WillFR130 ♦7	Good evening So this area of trees is currently Coed y Warrin. It is also been known as Coed Penfacha in the past. The English translating for the current name is The Warren woods. I see you picked up on my change set within minutes of me uploading it. At the time I thought I'd correcte...
156862179 by Drakeley152 @ 2024-09-20 11:05	1	2024-09-21 10:59	trigpoint	What is the source of this name? OS Opendata Streetview suggests it is Pen-lan Mabws. Diolch Phil
	2	2024-09-21 14:35	Drakeley152 ♦1	Hello, i was doing a survey of the area and actually visited the place. And found it was called Pen Lan. Cheers Drakeley
156859942 by Drakeley152 @ 2024-09-20 10:10	1	2024-09-20 16:26	trigpoint	Bore da A few things have gone wrong here and in other changes you have made. The name Bwlchteulu applies to the farmyard, not a single building. You should draw the farmyard and add the name / name:cy to that. ruins is not a top level tag You should use historic:ruins <whatever it was>...
156726370 by BigPaulSeamen @ 2024-09-17 11:48	1	2024-09-19 13:25	trigpoint	80 mph is a bit unlikely, whilst a private road has no legal limit this is just silly. Cheers Phil
	2	2024-09-20 18:50	JassKurn ♦154	Hi trigpoint. In England the speed limit laws (Road Traffic Act) apply to all roads that the general public have at least "Tolerated Access" to. For privately owned driveways and footways leading to a property, it is considered the public have "tolerated access" to reach th...
156729124 by BigPaulSeamen @ 2024-09-17 12:57	1	2024-09-18 16:15	trigpoint	Hi Please make your changeset comment descriptive and helpful to other mappers. Corrected the map is quite vague. I am wondering why this bridge has gone from open to construction. Why? And for how long? Unless it is closed for several months we do not normally update the map. Cheers Phil
	2	2024-11-25 04:18	Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660	what you meant by bridge=construction here?
	3	2024-11-25 18:39	JassKurn ♦154	This bridge is not under construction, so I assume the tagging in this changeset is a blunder. I have fixed the tagging in the following changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159585474 I originally added this replacement bridge, and still had the survey data
	4	2024-12-14 16:50	BigPaulSeamen ♦1	When i first made the edit the bridge had been closed indefinitely due to damage for a landslide. While this isnt the original news article i think it proves that my edit was correct at the time of making it https://www.msn.com/en-ie/news/world/views-to-die-for-cottage-on-cusp-of-400-foot-drop-a...
	5	2024-12-15 01:46	JassKurn ♦154	Maybe you have the wrong location for your landslide? The landslide mentioned in you link is not near this bridge.
	6	2024-12-19 19:51	BigPaulSeamen ♦1	"While this isnt the original news article i think it proves that my edit was correct at the time of making it"
156050793 by rupertmaesglas @ 2024-09-01 11:51	1	2024-09-02 14:33	trigpoint	Hi Rupert In this case I would not translate the name into English although if there is an English name that goes in the name:en tag. Names such as this are easily availble from the OS OpenData Streetview layer in the iD editor. Making use of these available sources at the time makes far more sens...
156057148 by rupertmaesglas @ 2024-09-01 14:24	1	2024-09-01 16:53	trigpoint	Hi Please be careful not to duplicate existing objects, take a few seconds to look at the map and check if the object already exists. Cheers Phil
	2	2024-09-02 14:07	rupertmaesglas ♦7	Hi Phil, Thanks for this. See other message. Bit of guidance: Woodpeck has been seeing a lot of issues with edits here, and I'm not sure what pleatform messages are being sent on. Forst I knew was a ban. I'm struggling to understand how the message platforms work, and can't see how t...
	3	2024-09-02 14:15	trigpoint	Messages notifications appear at the top right of openstreetmap.org page when you are logged in. You are also notified via your registered email address. Changeset comments (such as this) are also notified via your registered email address. Hope this helps Phll
154306677 by Rhydian Wilson @ 2024-07-23 13:04	1	2024-09-02 11:21	trigpoint	Hi Rhydian There are a few issues with this changeset. 1. You have created a duplicate amenity=fuel, this was already mapped. Please ensure you check existing features before adding duplicates. 2. It is very unlikely that the Rugby Club is pub. These are usually private for members only. It wou...
156056156 by rupertmaesglas @ 2024-09-01 14:03	1	2024-09-01 17:08	trigpoint	Really?
	2	2024-09-01 17:13	trigpoint	Unclassified in the middle of nowhere? No gps or Strava traces No connection to existing traces Not added buildings Cryptic unreadable hashtags
	3	2024-09-01 18:47	ceirios ♦48	I'd also like to question why "iaith" (language) is a hashtag here, too. You're adding these roads and buildings but not adding any name:cy tags.
	4	2024-09-02 12:38	rupertmaesglas ♦7	Thanks for this. All edits will undergo a validation process, but I shall go and see the exact status of that track shortly, in person. I have undcerstood the convention in Wales to be name=[welsh/local name], name:en=[name in English]. That would be in keeping with the cultural norms/ethical requir...
	5	2024-09-02 13:41	rupertmaesglas ♦7	@ceirios, we intend to add placenames as we go along, and need the building shapes to navigate wehn surveying. We would welcome your advice, and are keen to collaborate with you as a local. Please be in touch. Thanks
	6	2024-09-04 16:10	user_21425661 ♦22	Interestingly I think I can see a connection between https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12149852701#map=19/52.340583/-3.803238 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1417961073#map=19/52.339763/-3.800892 but yeah, not highway=unclassified and it could have been better connected to the existing track...
155683283 by Ken Appleby @ 2024-08-24 08:17	1	2024-08-25 16:46	kitsee ♦96	Hi there Ken, the simplest way to fix this would be to add a point where the path where the waterway and path meet, then tag that point as a ford. Kind regards, Kits
	2	2024-08-25 16:47	kitsee ♦96	forgive my bad grammar on the last message, what I meant to say is this, the simplest way to fix this would be to add a point where the waterway and path meet, then tag that point as a ford.
	3	2024-08-25 16:52	Ken Appleby ♦1	Thanks Kits. Yes, I understand but I didn't want to do that as I don't know the location. I thought it would be better for someone who actually surveys the path to do it. The most important thing, I think, is to remove the "ford" tag which is applied to the entire way and is clea...
	4	2024-08-25 18:06	kitsee ♦96	there's no point waiting for a survey for stuff like this especially when a lot of OSM was imported rather than surveyed. In this case you have enough information to justify the change. a Ford is somewhere where a waterway crosses a roadway and at present the waterway crosses the roadway wi...
	5	2024-08-26 10:02	trigpoint	@kitsee Your statement about a lot of OSM being imported is only partially true. Internationally a lot was imported, but in the UK we have always been very adverse to imports so here very little was imported. Cheers Phil
	6	2024-08-27 08:45	Ken Appleby ♦1	In my experience of walking these kinds of paths in GB, a stream is likely to be guided in a pipe or conduit under the path. So it's neither a ford nor a footbridge. I would prefer to leave such intersections alone until actually surveyed.
	7	2024-08-27 09:37	kitsee ♦96	for future reference in that case you would mark a section of a stream with `tunnel=culvet` and `layer=-1`. for now i would recommend placing a note here to make the survey request more visible
155751660 by trigpoint @ 2024-08-25 18:58	1	2024-08-25 20:12	LunaFox ♦1	This location does not work with any OSM/Overpass API's due to outdated/incorrect mapper technique. Overpass suggests remaking the location with OSM, which will not harm anyone, as I doubt many local mappers will feel deeply attached to their incorrect mapping of the Corn Exchange.....
	2	2024-08-25 21:31	trigpoint	Please can you post the overpass query you are using? Cheers Phil
	3	2024-08-25 21:53	trigpoint	What techniques do you believe are outdated and what are you trying to achieve? Cheers Phil
155741480 by LunaFox @ 2024-08-25 14:55	1	2024-08-25 19:04	trigpoint	This feels very unlikely, can't imagine the neighbours being happy. At least you have deleted it. Cheers Phil
155751208 by LunaFox @ 2024-08-25 18:44	1	2024-08-25 19:00	trigpoint	Hi Luna Please don't delete objects and redraw them. This loses history from the database and is disrespectful to other mappers. Cheers Phil
155605527 by LunaFox @ 2024-08-22 13:13	1	2024-08-25 11:41	trigpoint	Duplicate removed as per comment left on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155605669 Cheers Phil
155605276 by LunaFox @ 2024-08-22 13:08	1	2024-08-25 11:35	trigpoint	Hi Looks like someone saw sense and restored the Bowling Green to its proper name. This is therefore a duplication so I am removing it and correcting the existing object. Cheers Phil
155605669 by LunaFox @ 2024-08-22 13:16	1	2024-08-25 11:26	trigpoint	Hi Luna Please do not add duplicate objects to Openstreetmap. Soar Point is correctly mapped as an area and is visible on every renderer I am aware of. What do you mean by 'seen by api'. What API as openstreetmap does not have one. Cheers Phil
155389013 by rupertmaesglas @ 2024-08-17 20:38	1	2024-08-24 15:41	trigpoint	Bore da This edit is incorrect, highway=pedestrian is for pedestrianised streets in town centres. This was correctly mapped as a track. Maybe with a survey tracktype could be added but I am reverting this. Diolch Phil
	2	2024-08-25 15:40	rupertmaesglas ♦7	Thanks Phil, Much appreciated - good to get your guidance here. I can't remember when I made that edit, but I'll use the example elsewhere now. I've also learned the 'segregated' conventions, and am trying to train mappers here in the area to do the same. Thanks for the fe...
	3	2024-08-25 15:50	rupertmaesglas ♦7	Ah yes. I changed it because it is not a road for cars, and the area is decimated by 4x4s, who see it as a challenge to there. Local community (me included) are outragfed that this is happening, and I wanted to demonstrate that some careful tagging could help them, and that OpenStreetMap participati...
155685130 by ujinevich @ 2024-08-24 09:06	1	2024-08-24 15:11	trigpoint	Bore da Again you have made existing mapping worse, in merging https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1188489769 into a single building you have lost that they are separate semi detached houses. This can be checked using the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer in iD. They also have separate UPRN (Unique Prope...
155651440 by aidanreveley @ 2024-08-23 12:53	1	2024-08-23 12:58	trigpoint	Hi There is already a caravan park here, mapped as an area, however you have created a duplicate node. Please update the existing object rather than creating duplcates. I have merged these. Cheers Phil
155645152 by aidanreveley @ 2024-08-23 10:39	1	2024-08-23 11:54	trigpoint	Hi, not sure what you trying to achieve, but the pub is already mapped. Ok its a Hotel and Restaurant but thats a common issue. However in this and your other changesets you are using some very strange tags. A pub should be mapped as amenity=pub, and optician as shop=optician. Business is not a pri...
155646846 by ujinevich @ 2024-08-23 11:15	1	2024-08-23 11:25	trigpoint	Hi, this edit has removed existing data so has made OSM worse. You have deleted semis mapped as building=house, where individual units are shown and replaced them with building=yes. Remember you are working in an area with an active community and many things are already mapped. Please do not d...
155637533 by ujinevich @ 2024-08-23 07:36	1	2024-08-23 07:47	trigpoint	Bore da Just adding buildings is pointless, its not as though in Cymru the emergency services do not have access to OS mapping, they are very unlikely to use OSM. If you genuinely want to help OSM, although this area has active mappers, please add other useful information which is available from O...
	2	2024-08-28 18:53	ujinevich ♦7	I was participating in HOT OSM Project that aimed to map buildings here. I don't have additional information about this place Best regards, Eugene
155606716 by ujinevich @ 2024-08-22 13:39	1	2024-08-22 19:48	trigpoint	Bore da This edit has missed important visual clues. Buildings https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1309836157 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1309836158 are not detached and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1309836156 is clearly a conservatory so is never going to be stand alone. Cheers Phi...
155512078 by WillFR130 @ 2024-08-20 14:21	1	2024-08-22 19:10	trigpoint	Hi Will The Red Lion was already mapped and you have created a duplication. The pub is clearly visible on the map at osm.org. In the editor it shows as a building area with a black beer glass. You can see the tags if you select the building. Also the campsite looks a bit odd, in a residential dr...
155614804 by beza208 @ 2024-08-22 16:19	1	2024-08-22 18:07	trigpoint	Hi This edit has gone a little wrong. Whilst the buildings maybe could have been improved they should not have been squared as the frontage clearly follow the curve of the road. Buildings are not always square , Cheers Phil
155361736 by rupertmaesglas @ 2024-08-17 09:45	1	2024-08-22 17:57	trigpoint	Hi, don't you think it is odd to find an unmapped pub in a well mapped first world country? Especially one that clearly looks like a 1960s semi on aerial imagery? Cheers Phil I would certainly have checked the existing mapping and on doing so would have found https://www.openstreetmap.org/no...
155505992 by WillFR130 @ 2024-08-20 12:10	1	2024-08-21 10:58	trigpoint	Hi Please be careful not to duplicate objects in OpenStreetMap. The petrol station / shop and hotel are already mapped. Cheers Phil
	2	2024-08-21 11:01	WillFR130 ♦7	Hi. Thank you for the feedback.They didn't show up on my screen that's why I'd tagged them. Cheers Will
155410668 by Exterprook58 @ 2024-08-18 11:51	1	2024-08-18 15:35	trigpoint	Hi This kind of shows the futility of road relations beyond the first 99. A relation should not be used to link objects with no logical connection beyond a name/ref, what next a relation for all the Railway Inns or Station Roads? Cheers Phil
	2	2024-08-18 16:35	Exterprook58 ♦5	OK, fair point - I will separate the two sections
	3	2024-08-18 17:11	trigpoint	Thank you. You may want to do the same for any others like this. Cheers Phil
154096442 by Michaël_D @ 2024-07-18 11:23	1	2024-07-24 22:17	JayTurnr ♦155	Hi Michael, I have to ask why you added access=no on many roads here. Are the roads closed?
	2	2024-07-24 22:23	JayTurnr ♦155	I have reverted this changeset as there's no indication online that the A47 is closed
	3	2024-08-18 12:09	Michaël_D ♦1	Ohw.. that must be a mistake. There is no access by foot or bicycle. The road A47 is open!!
	4	2024-08-18 12:53	trigpoint	Hi Michael Just curious why you say there is no access for foot or bicycle? Are there signs explicitly restricting bikes or pedestrians? Cheers Phil
155234227 by Sproddy @ 2024-08-14 11:08	1	2024-08-15 07:08	rskedgell ♦1,478	You can't use Google Maps or other copyrighted material as a source, unless they have a licence which is compatible with OpenStreetMap. The Google Maps Terms of Use explicitly forbid using Google Maps content - both map data and Google Street View - for making any other content. It includes ...
	2	2024-08-15 15:20	trigpoint	Reverted in changset #155288108 Phil from DWG
155234338 by Sproddy @ 2024-08-14 11:10	1	2024-08-15 07:07	rskedgell ♦1,478	You can't use Google Maps or other copyrighted material as a source, unless they have a licence which is compatible with OpenStreetMap. The Google Maps Terms of Use explicitly forbid using Google Maps content - both map data and Google Street View - for making any other content. It includes ...
	2	2024-08-15 15:19	trigpoint	Reverted in changset #155288108 Phil from DWG
155273079 by stsquad @ 2024-08-15 09:00	1	2024-08-15 09:12	trigpoint	Hi, a swing gate seems very odd on a footpath. Are you sure it's not a kissing gate?
155096097 by 0235 @ 2024-08-11 10:53	1	2024-08-11 11:03	trigpoint	Crematorioum ? I would also add Hospital (A&E) Cheers Phil
	2	2024-08-11 14:54	0235 ♦25	Hospital is not written on the sign, this is done with symbols instead. e.g. if there was a sign with the train station symbol, you wouldn't also write "train station" just use the "destination:symbol=hospital" There is currently no A&E symbol on the wiki, just hos...
140639318 by Velocity01 @ 2023-08-31 14:43	1	2024-08-07 18:10	trigpoint	Hi This edit seems to have gone very wrong in a number of ways. What sources are you using as your en-US locale suggests you are not local? The name tag should only be used for actual names, not as a placeholder for random information. It was this howler I spotted on my OSMand screen. There i...
	2	2024-08-08 08:38	Velocity01 ♦2	Hi Phil, I am the NHS Travel planner for the Trust for the last 7 years. Although the whole area will be changing over the next 4 years due an expansion of the hospital. Kr Alex
89633098 by 123cargo_user @ 2020-08-19 12:05	1	2024-08-06 08:51	trigpoint	Hi This edit has gone a little wrong. Maxspeed:hgv in Scotland is 40 mph, not 50. Please ensure you are aware of which country you are editing in. Cheers Phil
89580411 by 123cargo_user @ 2020-08-18 14:15	1	2024-07-14 13:50	trigpoint	Hi, what sources were you using for this edit? A number of thing have gone very wrong with this changeset however. 1. Th smallest amount of research would have shown that in the UK maxspeed should be tagged with the mph suffix. 2. Maxspeed:goods has only been used here in the UK, there is a ta...
	2	2024-08-05 13:03	123cargo_user ♦15	Indeed there are o couple of wrong information in this changeset, but: 1. If you had looked at my other changesets made in UK area you would have seen that I used the speed limits in mph correctly. These edits were made in the same period I was aiming to make some changesets in Ireland. My mistake ...
	3	2024-08-06 07:45	trigpoint	I have corrected the maxspeed tag to 60 mph and changed maxspeed:goods to maxspeed:hgv. Cheers Phil
154807882 by Aurimas Fišeras @ 2024-08-04 11:31	1	2024-08-04 18:00	trigpoint	Unfortunately that wasn't a typo. Cheers Phil
154624811 by sheeponwheels @ 2024-07-30 21:49	1	2024-08-02 11:42	trigpoint	Hi, rather than remove the tracktype tag here wouldn't it be better to correct it? https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/941370 suggests tracktype=grade4 would be more informative for routers. Tracks do however need specific access tagging, this is actually a byway so it is lagal to access o...
154490516 by Map100000000000000 @ 2024-07-27 15:52	1	2024-07-30 20:09	trigpoint	Hi, what is the source of this edit? There is no soccer pitch on any available imagery. Cheers Phil
154490286 by Map100000000000000 @ 2024-07-27 15:46	1	2024-07-30 20:07	trigpoint	Hi What sources have you used for these edits. I can find no reference to Hells Kitchen in FHRS listings. Also the building=kiosk is certainly wrong here, shop=kiosk may be correct. Cheers Phil
154516846 by hcbcath @ 2024-07-28 11:43	1	2024-07-28 12:06	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to OSM. Please can you explain which routers were having problems and what those problems were. All 3 on OSM are currently working and it is unlikely that they have updated in under 20 minutes. Cheers Phil
	2	2024-07-28 17:28	hcbcath ♦1	ORS and a fork of Graphhopper, and my own can no longer route via the ferry line. I have now got to the bottom of it. The routing engines are the at the source of the problems (toll related). Sincerely apologies for making hasty changes to the service lanes, and thank you. I'll undo the chang...
	3	2024-07-28 17:36	trigpoint	Thank you
140561865 by hcbcath @ 2023-08-29 22:33	1	2024-07-28 15:45	trigpoint	Hi I am wondering why you have changed a road, that clearly provides access to a house, to a path which will prevent vehicle access? Rather than private=yes you should use access=private. Cheers Phil
154517495 by hcbcath @ 2024-07-28 11:59	1	2024-07-28 14:55	trigpoint	Hi Please could you explain the reason for these edits as you seem to have broken routing for HGVs? By changing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125103402 to motor_vehicle=yes will break routing by allowing hgvs to use the passenger checkin. Please discuss these problems with the UK community ...
154068188 by jack899 @ 2024-07-17 17:17	1	2024-07-26 09:23	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to OSM. We do not tag refs for tertiary and unclassified roads as these are only used internally by local authorities and they are not signed. Telling a normal user of OSM to follow the C2073 is only going to confuse as there are no signs. Sabre's wiki is also not a valid s...
	2	2024-07-26 11:26	trigpoint	Changed to highway_authority_ref
154077615 by jack899 @ 2024-07-17 22:42	1	2024-07-18 07:19	rskedgell ♦1,478	Hi, I noticed that you added ref=C993 to Round Coppice Road. Unless this number is explicitly signposted, this should be changed to official_ref=C993. Are you able to confirm that the licence of the SABRE Roads website is compatible with OpenStreetMap? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ro...
	2	2024-07-26 11:25	trigpoint	Changed to highway_authority_ref
154077638 by jack899 @ 2024-07-17 22:43	1	2024-07-26 11:25	trigpoint	Changed to highway_authority_ref and name fixed
154077653 by jack899 @ 2024-07-17 22:45	1	2024-07-26 11:24	trigpoint	Changed to highway_authority_ref
154077680 by jack899 @ 2024-07-17 22:46	1	2024-07-26 11:24	trigpoint	Fixed by Nathan_A_RF
154077697 by jack899 @ 2024-07-17 22:48	1	2024-07-26 09:42	trigpoint	In OSM we follow the on the ground rule, this road is signed as the A167(M) so that is what should be what we map. Sabre is again not a valid source for OSM. Cheers Phil
	2	2024-07-26 11:23	trigpoint	Reverted
154077800 by jack899 @ 2024-07-17 22:55	1	2024-07-26 09:30	trigpoint	Hi again Not sure why you have change the B877 back to a ref tag, it was previously in the old_ref tag with a pretty good explanation of why in the note tag. Again sabre is not a valid source for use in OSM. I have reverted this edit. Cheers Phil
	2	2024-07-26 11:23	trigpoint	Reverted
153496563 by Les B @ 2024-07-03 10:59	1	2024-07-03 11:27	Mex ♦72	this doesn't look to match any route visible on the sat image.
	2	2024-07-03 16:49	Les B ♦2	I have taken the footpath from the Ordnance survey map. I haven't been there but Ordnance survey are usually correct.
	3	2024-07-03 17:10	Les B ♦2	Hi Mex , l have double checked and I can see the footpath sign on Google street view.
	4	2024-07-04 09:18	trigpoint	Hi Les Openstreetmap is an open data project. We can only use sources that are not subject to copyright and that we have permission to use. The gold standard in mapping is seeing it with your own eyes. We cannot use either Google Street View or current OS maps for this reason. OS gets a litt...
	5	2024-07-04 11:19	Les B ♦2	Of course I will delete the footpath. Next time I'm in the area I will map it with my GPS.
	6	2024-07-04 11:29	trigpoint	Thank you
153451262 by Bigbigcheese @ 2024-07-02 11:22	1	2024-07-02 12:19	trigpoint	Where is Wern?
	2	2024-07-03 09:16	Bigbigcheese ♦2	Merely a Wem away, a Wem away...
153173782 by RAC_UK @ 2024-06-25 20:08	1	2024-06-30 18:15	trigpoint	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137155338 probably needs a survey. Whilst name:cy and name:en match, name is totally different. Obviously there is a typo in the English name, should be Welsh. But the question is really are the royal Welsh fusiliers comrades the operator and perhaps name:en s...
	2	2024-06-30 19:37	RAC_UK ♦19	Hi Phil, I'm up there again in a few weeks time and will be noting what is written on the building. There are probably a few in the area that will look wrong either way.
	3	2024-06-30 19:58	trigpoint	Thank you
152710790 by ButterflyMemorandum @ 2024-06-15 08:28	1	2024-06-15 10:58	trigpoint	Please split your edits so that you do not create huge bounding boxes. The edits you make in Sheffield should be in a separate changeset to those made in Cornwall. Cheers Phil
	2	2024-06-15 11:27	ButterflyMemorandum ♦1	Ta, forgot I had a Cornwall one in the mix still
152647612 by RAC_UK @ 2024-06-13 19:33	1	2024-06-14 08:16	trigpoint	Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong. I assume it is an automated armchair edit as you didn't look at the edit history or notes? If you had you would have seen that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11979023547 has been added in error as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204828073/history...
	2	2024-06-14 10:23	RAC_UK ♦19	Hi Phil, Thanks for letting me know, some of the footage I had for the area and was using to cross checkis letting a little dated now:so I’ll leave Shropshire alone until I pass that way again later in the year.
152069618 by Paul Berry @ 2024-05-31 08:58	1	2024-05-31 17:24	trigpoint	Hi Not sure if you have surveyed this, but I know it well. I am not convinced this fits the definition of a busway. The first paragraph starts with "Busways are not meant to be used by motorists, pedestrians, or cyclists.". Whilst there are no entry signs there is no restriction on foot...
	2	2024-05-31 23:19	Paul Berry ♦124	Hi Phil. You're right: I had mis-tagged (it doesn't help that the Standard Layer _still_ doesn't render busways). Now corrected on changeset #152101448. Regards, _Paul_
	3	2024-06-01 08:05	trigpoint	Thank you
151164544 by womer_uk @ 2024-05-10 21:07	1	2024-05-13 12:03	trigpoint	Hi, please do not tag for the renderer. In OSM the name tag is for actual names, in this case the name of the stadium, the object mapped in OSM is Elland Road Stadium. Any other information belongs in other tags, such as operator. Cheers Phil
151000504 by Maptapper @ 2024-05-07 09:28	1	2024-05-09 21:07	trigpoint	Hi, what is the source of these names? Cheers Phil
149026774 by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account @ 2024-03-22 18:37	1	2024-03-27 17:49	trigpoint	Well the spelling was correct before this and close to 200 others where tag-fiddled away, https://taghistory.raifer.tech/?#***/display/analogue The tagging language of OSM is British English, or standard English so we should not be changing a correct spelling to American English, or Simplified En...
	2	2024-03-27 18:49	Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660	https://taghistory.raifer.tech/?#*/display/analogue&*/display/analog - if display=analog is wrong and not preferable then it is still possible to discuss it and deprecate that tag with 13 000 uses
	3	2024-03-27 18:51	Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660	Also, if there is an actual support for keeping both versions I can roll back these edits
104730770 by kerr smith @ 2021-05-15 12:13	1	2024-03-23 12:11	trigpoint	Hi Kerr Where exactly did you look it up? Its just a unnamed spot height on historic OS maps. Cheers Phil
	2	2024-03-24 15:15	kerr smith ♦5	Hi Phil, Thanks for commenting on this. I found this name on the following wikimedia page: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_north-east_top_of_Mynydd_Mawr_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1028701.jpg I will add this wikimedia page to the tags now. Thanks again for your comment, Kerr
148730502 by Pineajelly @ 2024-03-16 12:55	1	2024-03-17 13:58	trigpoint	Please make your changeset comments meaningful to inform other mappers what your intentions are.
148769324 by bigfatfrog67 @ 2024-03-17 12:18	1	2024-03-17 13:41	trigpoint	Should we be tagging 'the law'? It doesn't exactly need a survey.
	2	2024-03-17 13:48	bigfatfrog67 ♦8	Was just there and no smoking on seats outside either.
	3	2024-03-17 13:49	bigfatfrog67 ♦8	But yes, probably don't need actual surveys for such things. I just happened to be there anyway. 😁
111806991 by tomkynaston @ 2021-09-28 09:00	1	2024-03-17 13:31	trigpoint	Hi Just wondering why you removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6280854138/history ? Cheers Phil
148228217 by DaveF @ 2024-03-04 22:55	1	2024-03-06 15:43	gurglypipe ♦873	Why make this change? It doesn’t seem to comply with the flow chart on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dhalt
	2	2024-03-07 20:52	phodgkin ♦62	Yes, the stops at Kirkhaugh and Linley Halt are very specifically identified as halts by the South Tynedale Railway. It is a useful and used distinction on this railway.
	3	2024-03-10 16:02	DaveF ♦1,566	From what I can gather (people don't reply to my enquiries), the data in the graphic was invented by a few German rail enthusiasts. I've struggled to find any information that it's a wide spread interpretation (even in Germany). In the GB discussions no one had any comprehension of it...
	4	2024-03-12 18:56	phodgkin ♦62	The fact that the operator calls it a halt? It's a common pattern on preserved railways to distinguish between "full service" stations catering to tourists (i.e. with a car park) and "only a halt" where the only expected customers are walkers. Linley and Kirkhaugh are desig...
	5	2024-03-12 22:53	gurglypipe ♦873	I’ve reverted the change as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148569986: the fact that the operator calls them halts, not stations, seems pretty bulletproof to me.
	6	2024-03-15 11:44	gurglypipe ♦873	You appear to have re-added the changes as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148664413, again changing halt → station. In retrospect I realise I should have been more selective in my revert and not wiped out the rest of your changeset (which does contain some other small changes apart ...
	7	2024-03-17 09:16	gurglypipe ♦873	No response to that point of the discussion, so I’ve changed the three station nodes back to railway=halt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148762569.
	8	2024-03-17 11:56	trigpoint	@DaveF > Almost all (all?) multi-track stations > have crossovers nearby. Not really related to this, but has become interesting this week as apparently neither Wellington nor Telford Central have crossovers nearby which is preventing Shrewsbury-Wellington or Wolverhampton-Telford trains....
	9	2024-03-17 23:53	DaveF ♦1,566	(My replies are asterisked) The fact that the operator calls it a halt? * The name is irrelevant to defining an object, it could be named 'Joe Bloggs'. Naming it 'halt' doesn't define what a halt is. It's a common pattern on preserved railways to distinguish ...
148527943 by Chris Denomy @ 2024-03-12 00:36	1	2024-03-12 18:08	trigpoint	Bore da Just wondering why you have deleted this right of way, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209115561/history? Diolch Phil
	2	2024-03-14 00:36	Chris Denomy ♦7	Hi Phil. My mistake. I thought I was deleting a golf path that wasn't there. A 'right of way' sounds like a different animal. My apologies.
148558896 by Pineajelly @ 2024-03-12 16:59	1	2024-03-12 17:07	trigpoint	Hi Please make your changeset comments meaningful so that other mappers can see you intentions, bn v and your other comments are pretty meaningless. Cheers Phil
125874815 by ArjanJager @ 2022-09-06 20:36	1	2024-03-08 14:00	trigpoint	Hi Legal prohibitions of foot/horse/bikes are very rare in the UK. I cannot recall any such restriction on this part of the A5 and cannot see the necessary signs of mapillary imagery. You say Self Observered, what precisely did you observe to make this judgement? Cheers Phil
	2	2024-03-10 19:12	ArjanJager ♦16	Hey Phil, Thanks for the comment. I am not aware of these legal laws, as I am Dutch. I changed it as I deemed it to dangerous, and I wanted to cover all the streets in this county on Wandrer.earth - walking this street seems not wise.
	3	2024-03-10 19:14	ArjanJager ♦16	And for this part of th A5 there is actually a path for cyclist etc on the right (direction NW).
	4	2024-03-10 19:41	trigpoint	Thank you. To the east there is a path cyclists and pedestrians, but any router worth its salt will choose this over the road, but to the west there is no alternative. A pedestrian will choose the verge obviously. In OSM we map legal access restrictions, not what we think are dangerous. These...
	5	2024-03-10 19:55	ArjanJager ♦16	Thanks. You are right we should map legal access. Surprising to me though that legally you can walk on the highway. I'll remove the restrictions.
	6	2024-03-10 20:18	trigpoint	Thank you. All roads and paths are highways :) And the A5 is a very a very ancient one. Removing highway rights is generally no done. We have a saying "Once a highway always a highway" which was coined in 1921. Roads with restricted access are mostly new builds which have never had ...
	7	2024-03-10 20:40	ArjanJager ♦16	Well, thanks I learned something new. Just makes it extra challenging for us Wandrer.earth to get 100% on all roads in counties. At least I know now if I go get at it again, I won't be arrested.
	8	2024-03-10 21:17	trigpoint	The only public roads you are not allowed to walk on are motorways and where specifically signed. https://assets.digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk/media/55b8bd6fe5274a151e000015/Information-sign-start-motorway.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8f/UK_traffic_sign_625.1.svg/80...
148351759 by GregEvans09 @ 2024-03-07 16:48	1	2024-03-09 18:41	trigpoint	Hi Greg Diolch for your edits on Ynys Môn, however in this and your other changesets you have tagged buildings a landuse=farmyard. This tag should only be used on the outer boundary of a farmyard. Please could you correct this and bear in mind in the future. Diolch Phil
148421488 by Emmanuel_Quansah @ 2024-03-09 13:00	1	2024-03-09 17:50	trigpoint	Hi Something has gone very wrong, you have added strange tags (man_made=planter material=shea butter) to many objects spanning two continents. I am not sure what your intentions were but this is not good. Maybe try using iD as a beginner and keep to reality in a smaller area. I have reverted ...
148428377 by Nathan_A_RF @ 2024-03-09 15:40	1	2024-03-09 16:59	trigpoint	It is rather unlikely that these roads are still 30 don't you think?
	2	2024-03-09 17:03	Nathan_A_RF ♦219	I would think so, though I was just correcting the maxspeed:type tag rather than the maxspeed tag itself. I cannot verify the maxspeed tag so I won't change it.
148203638 by likeaword @ 2024-03-04 12:09	1	2024-03-09 16:14	trigpoint	Why? Other than my previous comments regarding one name then use the name tag. Mapio Cymru has a maximum zoom of 16. On OSM Carto will not start to display this node until zoom 17, then only as a dot. The name does not appear until zoom 18 which Mapio Cymru is not (yet?) capable of. Cheers ...
148008833 by likeaword @ 2024-02-28 11:16	1	2024-02-28 14:20	trigpoint	Bore da The name:cy tag you have added is in English, not Ysgol something? Diolch Phil
	2	2024-02-29 08:58	likeaword ♦5	Shw Mae Phil The direct translation would be Ysgol Gynradd Borderbrook but both the school and Estyn seem to use the English name when communicating in Welsh which is not heard of this close to the border. I try to avoid "rogue translations". Though it's an interesting policy q...
	3	2024-02-29 08:58	likeaword ♦5	*not _unheard_ of the close to the border
	4	2024-03-09 12:55	trigpoint	Adding English names to the name:cy tag does seem to be corrupting that tag. In openstreetmap if an object has a single name then it belongs in the name tag. Likewise for Tesco and Burger King. So not sure what you are trying to achieve with these edits, they seem to be diminishing Welsh names ra...
	5	2024-03-11 11:21	likeaword ♦5	We did have a long debate about this on the Talk-GB list and the wiki entry for multi-lingual tagging in Wales reflects the outcome of that debate. That says that in instances where the name is the same in Welsh and English: "The name: tag should contain the name. It is not, in principle, ne...
148383862 by tsilvs0 @ 2024-03-08 13:13	1	2024-03-08 17:56	trigpoint	Please keep your changesets to sensible areas, i.e. single countries. This has created a large changeset with a bounding box covering most of Europe which makes it difficult for mappers to spot what has changed in their local areas.
	2	2024-03-09 15:30	silversurfer83 ♦3,417	Hi there :) you added this bank here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11704054369 You added (closed) to the name. What exactly do you mean? safe travels silversurfer83
	3	2024-03-09 17:25	tsilvs0 ♦1	Hello, everyone! It's my first contribution, I made it from "Organic Maps" app, some of them were pending for some years even until I finally made an OSM account. Is it possible to break these changes into separate changesets?
	4	2024-03-09 17:27	tsilvs0 ♦1	@sliversurfer83 I didn't know at the time how to delete the business. The bank branch was closed for good last time I checked it personally.
	5	2024-03-09 18:01	silversurfer83 ♦3,417	Hi tsilvs0 Thanks for your speedy reply :) After uploading there's no changing the CS. But thats alright. It's simply a little nuisance to people keeping an eye on The Map so don't worry too much now. One follow up question on the bank: does it still look like there was a ban...
	6	2024-03-12 12:20	Steferrd ♦1	Path surfaces are crucial elements in geometry and various applications, including gaming. When it comes to games like Geometry Dash, path surfaces refer to the different types of surfaces or platforms that the player navigates through. In Geometry Dash, players navigate through various path surf...
	7	2024-03-12 16:13	tsilvs0 ♦1	@silversurfer83 Hello again. As far as I remember, back then the building of the bank itself and all of the branding was present in 2022. But I don't have any information on current state of the place, sorry 😓
	8	2024-03-20 15:36	map per ♦1,298	Thanks, I changed the amenity=bank into a disused:amenity=bank
	9	2024-03-20 16:18	silversurfer83 ♦3,417	Thanks map per. Forgot to do it, sorry. tsilvs0, thanks forbclarifying Happy mapping everyone
148301432 by Mikeb46 @ 2024-03-06 15:43	1	2024-03-08 08:23	trigpoint	Is there a ramp or is this only for the super fit? Also please make your changeset comments meaningful so as to describe to other mappers what and why you are changing things. Cheers Phil
148125376 by Odud @ 2024-03-02 10:38	1	2024-03-06 09:15	rskedgell ♦1,478	Is the licence of CAMRA's proprietary WhatPub? database compatible with OSM? The statement that "Where not already belonging or assigned to others, all material remains our copyright." on the site would suggest otherwise.
	2	2024-03-06 12:52	trigpoint	That would also say to me that we cannot use whatpub and I believe this, very long, list of edits require reverting/redacting.
	3	2024-03-06 20:19	Odud ♦1	I assume that the copyright statement refers to items that were generated specifically for WhatPub, for example reviews, photographs etc. But not just facts that are generally known i.e. their telephone number, or Facebook URL etc. Surely for facts like these then Fair Use applies
	4	2024-03-06 21:03	trigpoint	Fair use of facts is an American concept. OSM is a UK organisation and in the UK we have a laws on database rights. Taking information on the scale you have from a database on this scale is not fair use. CAMRA have spent time and effort collecting these facts and under UK law this effort is protecte...
	5	2024-03-06 22:00	Odud ♦1	OK Fine, can you tell me how to remove all the changes. Some sort of bulk process is needed
	6	2024-03-06 23:59	trigpoint	We can revert the changes. It is obviously possible to do your own survey of such things or add them from your own local knowledge. Cheers Phil
	7	2024-03-07 13:50	trigpoint	iD is not a suitable tool for reverting this number of changes. I did say we can revert these as we have experience with more powerful tools. Please do try reverting them with iD, I am in the process of doing a revert and am working through the conflicts caused by later edits, I am trying to avoi...
	8	2024-03-07 15:54	trigpoint	I have completely reverted these changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148348284
	9	2024-03-08 11:02	Odud ♦1	Thanks very much for doing this. There are also related changes with comments: 1) Updating pubs in North East Sussex CAMRA area 2) Updating pubs in Western Sussex CAMRA area If it easy to revert these I would be very grateful. Pete
148285216 by TJ@Trapeze @ 2024-03-06 09:49	1	2024-03-06 11:43	mapboy63 ♦23	Why would you change this to highway=unclassified? It's a textbook example of a service road. Seems like a very strange first changeset
	2	2024-03-06 12:57	trigpoint	"to support upstream system" suggests this is some sort of organised edit. You may need to comply withhttps://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines What upstream system are you refering ?to?
	3	2024-03-06 13:36	trigpoint	Found it https://www.trapezegroup.com/ @TJ@Trapeze You should not change OSM tagging to suit your software as that is likely to break other peoples applications. If your software cannot use a service road then it suggests that your software is broken and needs to be fixed.
	4	2024-03-07 18:34	mapboy63 ♦23	Thanks trigpoint. Looks like TJ has reverted the change in 148350455.
148278156 by rskedgell @ 2024-03-06 06:55	1	2024-03-06 07:49	trigpoint	Hi Access=no is still present after your edit. Cheers Phil
	2	2024-03-06 08:10	rskedgell ♦1,478	Hi @trigpoint. I'm waiting for a reply from @ajmat as they give a source more recent than the Mapillary imagery available to me. If I don't get a response, I'll go there tomorrow and check.
	3	2024-03-06 08:15	trigpoint	Ok, thank you. Phil
147999300 by Mateusz Konieczny @ 2024-02-28 06:56	1	2024-02-28 10:33	gurglypipe ♦873	That is the name for this plantation, though, according to OS open data. How is it suspect? I’ve re-added it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148007232
	2	2024-02-29 14:00	Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660	as mentioned, it was weirdly tagged - in such case I tend to reach out to mapper in this their account was deleted which is a strong indicator of vandalism and I have given up on writing to them I guess I was too suspicious - I guess that opening note instead would be better? Or writing to tal...
	3	2024-02-29 14:43	gurglypipe ♦873	Opening a note would probably be better in future, as those tend to catch the attention of active local mappers who can help out Thanks for your efforts to clean things up :)
	4	2024-03-05 20:34	trigpoint	Intrigued what was weird about the tagging?
148201623 by john paul jones & gringo @ 2024-03-04 11:19	1	2024-03-05 20:23	trigpoint	Hi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208820049 seems a bit odd for a bridleway. Bicycle should be yes and horse designated although the difference between yes and designated in unimportant. It shouldn't be destination.
	2	2024-03-07 09:42	john paul jones & gringo ♦19	Hello, It is signposted as a public bridleway which is why I added that designation. I have asked the question of @jordan8396 as to the reason for changing both from bicycle=yes, foot=yes to others but as yet haven't had a reply. I didn't want to change it back to what I had previously ...
147828927 by The Equalizer @ 2024-02-23 18:00	1	2024-02-27 11:26	KasperSFranz ♦62	Can we remove the wikipedia with same note?
	2	2024-02-28 20:40	The Equalizer ♦6	Multiple OSM relations with one wikidata breaks how Kartographer displays them at Wikipedia. The wikipedia tag doesn't have the same number of shapes so it's less noticeable. The tag guidance notes don't seem to outlaw having it on multiple, but could put a secondary tag on the lesser...
	3	2024-02-29 09:52	fortera_au ♦1,070	OSM shouldn't be edited to fix how Kartographer renders. It seems like either Q23287 actually matches to two objects in OSM (which would be pretty rare) or that the Wikidata tag should only be on one, in which case it's best to actually explain that in your edit. I'm not from t...
	4	2024-02-29 14:43	trigpoint	Both OSM objects valid, one is an administrative county which provides the usual council services. The ceremonial county still covers other things. Each should have its own wikidata and Wikipedia items, as do others in the UK.
	5	2024-02-29 21:55	Woazboat ♦80	Multiple OSM objects pointing to the same wikidata entry is perfectly valid and should not be removed
147774219 by N7325 @ 2024-02-22 13:39	1	2024-02-22 15:24	trigpoint	Why have you deleted these ways which are clearly visible on aerial imagery? Cheers Phil
146452279 by NastassiaKalesnikava @ 2024-01-19 17:33	1	2024-02-17 14:33	trigpoint	What is the source of this edit? There is no evidence of this being oneway on https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=51.300557%7E0.931243&lvl=18.6&pi=-14.8&style=x&dir=19.9 Cheers Phil
	2	2024-02-20 13:34	NastassiaKalesnikava ♦61	We discussed this place in the note. However, you are right that it is actually difficult to tell whether a vanway is present in a given area. I have removed it. Thank you!
	3	2024-02-20 15:00	trigpoint	Thank you
147554820 by Falsernet @ 2024-02-17 02:26	1	2024-02-17 17:21	trigpoint	Why unclassified, these are private and very restricted? Service is perfect, its not as through you can drive around the Roundabout and come back out.
	2	2024-02-23 02:45	Falsernet ♦151	Just figured it made sense for the layout of the road and the way it distributes traffic to smaller service roads, plus the existing turning lane being unclassified already
140175862 by NastassiaKalesnikava @ 2023-08-21 11:14	1	2024-02-17 13:17	Richard ♦220	Hi - this change is incorrect. The Montgomery Canal is not open to boats throughout this entire length.
	2	2024-02-17 13:32	trigpoint	As a local mapper I am intrigued by what sources you were using to determine that this canal is open?
	3	2024-02-23 18:02	NastassiaKalesnikava ♦61	Hi! Thank you for the edit. The edit was made based on the user's detailed comment and photo from the area. Since you say that the channel is closed, it means the user sent spam data. Thanks for the edit!
147289202 by joey_geoloog @ 2024-02-10 11:38	1	2024-02-10 13:02	trigpoint	Hi, thank you for your edit. It is good practice when changing a node to a building to retain the node as part of the building, rather than deleting it. This helps to preserve history. Cheers Phil
	2	2024-02-11 16:40	joey_geoloog ♦13	Thanks Phil! I will do that for the future, thanks for letting me know!
146814793 by Melan839 @ 2024-01-29 10:18	1	2024-01-29 18:09	InsertUser ♦446	What is your source for these?
	2	2024-01-29 19:43	silversurfer83 ♦3,417	Hello again :) all new ATMs added in this chageset (CS) have "ATM" in the "name=*" tag. That doesn't look right. Generally they get the name of the bank operating them, if necessary. The information that this object is an ATM is already given in the tag "amenity=atm&...
	3	2024-01-30 10:22	Melan839 ♦3	Hi silversurfer83 again :) Okay I will change it. Because I did see other tags in a few countries specifically mentioning "ATM" so I thought it is needed, hence in fact I put it :( I do know however that some ATMs are specifically known as ATMs, for e.g. in India, SBI ATM and SBI Ba...
	4	2024-01-30 10:35	Melan839 ♦3	@silversurfer83, i have changed the names and upgraded the tags as appropriate. Thanks for the guidance.
	5	2024-01-30 11:03	silversurfer83 ♦3,417	Thank you very much :) Happy mapping
	6	2024-02-07 15:46	trigpoint	Please keep changes like this to sensible areas. This covers two continents and creates a bounding box covering most of Europe and the eastern US and Canada. Such changes should be split to limit them to a single country.
	7	2024-02-07 16:14	Melan839 ♦3	@trigpoint, I will change it by tomorrow. Will delete them and restart.
	8	2024-02-07 16:16	Melan839 ♦3	@trigpoint - can you advice on the solution? Should I just delete the points and remark them? How do I make changes to this 'changeset', I dont find an option anywhere?
	9	2024-02-07 16:16	silversurfer83 ♦3,417	dont't delete them. this won't change this changeset. simply leave it. It's just that you keep it local in the future
	10	2024-02-07 17:40	trigpoint	As silversurfer says, don't change this one but split your changes in future into smaller areas
	11	2024-02-10 20:10	maro21 ♦714	1. One changeset = one country, or even better, one city. 2. ATMs don't have names. The operator of the atm should be given in the [operator] tag. Not always banks are operators of ATMs, please check it twice. 3. atm=yes is not a tag used with amenity=atm. It is the tag used with amenity=bank...
133837637 by ToniE @ 2023-03-18 20:39	1	2023-03-24 14:20	ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme ♦31	Hallo ToniE, Danke für Deine Änderungen am Sylt-Shuttle. Eine Frage zum Tagging: für eine Zugverladung wurde bisher route=shuttle_train in OSM berücksichtigt. Beispiel Eurotunnel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180387103 Bis zum letzten Daten-Update hat auch die Sylt-Ver...
	2	2023-03-24 15:59	ToniE ♦1,233	Servus, das Proposal ist 10 Jahre alt, gilt als "abandoned (inactiv)", wurde nie verabschiedet -> also 'nein': nicht wieder als route=shuttle_train mappen. Mit hatten sich die Nackenhaare aufgestellt (tun sie auch noch, wenn ich mir https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1803...
	3	2023-03-25 21:45	vng_me ♦124	Don't know if it is a valid argument here or not, but the famous La Manche shuttle is mapped like route=shuttle_train. So now routing engines should support both versions COUNT(shuttle_train) == 26, COUNT(shuttle=yes) == 6 ..
	4	2023-03-26 09:32	ToniE ♦1,233	route=shuttle_train versus route=train + shuttle=yes (or whatever) is a minor concern here for me as long as these tags can only be found on route-relations. I deleted OSM ways here that were tagged with route=shuttle_train with some other tags (but not railway=track) to represent the railway tra...
	5	2023-03-26 09:38	vng_me ♦124	Ok, no problem, your arguments are valid here.
	6	2023-03-26 10:39	ToniE ♦1,233	Thanks, and here we are with the discussion in community https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/route-shuttle-train-deprecation-of-13-11-year-old-never-activated-proposal/97351
	7	2023-03-27 10:00	ToniE ♦1,233	Seems that my edit has been reverted ... for the time being hopefully. From my perspective: be prepared that my edit will be seen as valid deletion and prepare your routing engines to work with relations and follow the discussion in the community.
	8	2023-03-27 11:58	vng_me ♦124	I have already updated our routing engine. And I agree with you that route=train + shuttle=yes is the better scheme here. The same as route=ferry.
	9	2023-03-27 12:04	vng_me ♦124	And of course, we as the OSM community should avoid dummy duplicating ways like in La Manche, where existing relation is more than enough. Probably should unify additional tags like shuttle=yes or service=shuttle/car_shuttle or whatever ...
	10	2023-03-27 12:09	ToniE ♦1,233	Thanks.
	11	2023-03-27 13:08	ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme ♦31	@vng_me: our routing engine = Valhalla?
	12	2023-03-27 13:35	vng_me ♦124	Organic Maps
	13	2023-03-31 16:11	vng_me ♦124	Hm, seems like I realized why there was a dedicated route=shuttle_train way. Because it has only start/end points connected with entrance/exit highway ways. Now railway=rail way has a lot of common nodes with other highways and routing engines (without any specific processing) interpret these nod...
	14	2023-03-31 17:20	ToniE ♦1,233	> Hm, seems like I realized why there was a dedicated route=shuttle_train way. Yeah, another reason - but still not valid reason. I've discussed this topic with the maintainer of osm2po and I've come to the conclusion that valid transfer points from highway=* to railway=rail shoul...
	15	2023-03-31 18:40	vng_me ♦124	Ok, but now what is the difference with this node (actual car entrance) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4278583112 and this node (some intermediate stop) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4592378548
	16	2023-03-31 22:21	ToniE ♦1,233	https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4592378548 represents the stop position of trains for public transport relations mapped according to the so called PTv2 (public transport version 2 = https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Public_Transport&oldid=625726 ) The node ...
	17	2023-03-31 23:12	vng_me ♦124	I understand, my point was that now the routing engine can't distinguish car shuttle stop vs bicycle/pedestrian stop.
	18	2023-04-01 09:09	ToniE ♦1,233	The major difference is - railway=car_shuttle for transfer point - railway=stop or railway=halt for all normal traffic
	19	2024-02-06 20:42	trigpoint	If we use the railway rather than the dedicated shuttle route how do we then ensure that routing doesn't then continue around the circle to leave at the boarding station?
	20	2024-02-06 20:46	trigpoint	Also routing no longer seems to work.
	21	2024-02-07 13:11	ToniE ♦1,233	I did not changed a bit since 10 month ago, so I don't know why routing is broken now. > how do we then ensure that routing doesn't then continue around the circle to leave at the boarding station? I do not get the context here, also the automated translations aren't helpful....
	22	2024-02-07 13:30	vng_me ♦124	OSRM, Graphhopper and Valhalla are not working here for almost a year since this particular changeset where we are writing comments :)
	23	2024-02-07 14:10	ToniE ♦1,233	As I wrote 11 months ago > Seems that my edit has been reverted ... for the time being hopefully. So, I did not investigate, did also not insist further and did not try to start an edit war. From my point of view, I assumed all is in the state as before my edit.
	24	2024-02-07 14:20	trigpoint	Still deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123801601/history
	25	2024-02-07 16:14	ToniE ♦1,233	Oops. So let's revert this/my CS. There is only one conflict with CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6377345 where chris66 reverted part of my CS.
	26	2024-02-08 02:38	vng_me ♦124	Well, I took the liberty of reverting it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147198870 Wait until routing engines will update their data.
147106612 by Hawaiianblue @ 2024-02-05 19:27	1	2024-02-05 19:47	vng_me ♦124	I already wrote you in other comments. Your changes are controversial. Especially access=no. Please, talk to the local UK community first.
	2	2024-02-05 20:09	vng_me ♦124	1. access=no may technically be used to include eg foot=no , but semantically it's not nice for showing something that doesn't apply as a whole to the general public. If needed, using foot= or motor_vehicle= alone is better. 2. motor_vehcle=permissive is a very common possible mistake . ...
	3	2024-02-05 20:31	Hawaiianblue ♦4	It's not "yes" according the user manual. Only motor vehicles are allowed access. You can't walk, cycle or ride a horse into the site. According the the User manual, Ferry terminals (of which Eurotunnel is) should be set to "permissive" and toll=yes. Permissive does not...
	4	2024-02-05 20:36	trigpoint	Hi What is the User Manual of which you speak? In OSM we have a wiki, but that is intended to document how we map, not dictate how we should map. That tagging you are changing has been in place for a very long time, so is probably not broken. Cheers Phil
	5	2024-02-05 20:37	vng_me ♦124	All the Eurotunnel service roads are already mapped as foot=no, bicycle=no, horse=no, etc. access=no is strange. What value do your changes give? I ask on osm-gb community, they are also agree that =permissive is odd here.
	6	2024-02-05 20:40	Hawaiianblue ♦4	Wiki or what ever you want to call it, is the defacto user manual for editing OSM. Legally the access is permissive. That's just a fact. And a map should represent facts, not personal interpretations of what it should be.
	7	2024-02-05 20:41	Hawaiianblue ♦4	Access to "All=no" because there is only access for motor vehicles, which is set to Permissive.
	8	2024-02-05 20:42	Hawaiianblue ♦4	I'm unsubscribing from the conversation now. Because the access is by law and any other sensible definition permissive.
	9	2024-02-05 21:10	SK53 ♦864	Please do not unsubscribe from this conversation. If you fail to discuss this all these edits may be reverted. Consider that OSM is nearly 20 years old, and infrastructure like the Channel Tunnel will have received attention over many years to make sure it is compatible with various routing serv...
	10	2024-02-06 10:54	trigpoint	The problem we now have is that routing is seriously broken and is now using a service entrance, rather than the actual check in. Whilst motor_vehicle=permissive may be true, not tagging everything inside that area as permissive is bound to cause problems, also not leaving the primary route as ea...
	11	2024-02-16 19:37	vng_me ♦124	What are the next steps here? And here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147054398
139062379 by Northeno @ 2023-07-27 00:35	1	2024-01-29 15:34	trigpoint	This seems kind of unlikely, what is the source of these edits?
145552337 by Richard Carden @ 2023-12-26 23:12	1	2023-12-27 14:19	trigpoint	Hi Please make changeset comments clear and informative to make it clear to local mappers what you are changing and why. Relations such a "Strategic Road Network" do not belong in OSM, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories Also A458(T) (England...
145450278 by 9R5W9C5FHX @ 2023-12-23 20:58	1	2023-12-24 10:47	trigpoint	Hi, this edit has gone very wrong. An unclassified road is usual expected to be metalled. This is clearly a track across an arable field. Only used by tractors and very very unlikely to have public access and even less likely to have public vehicle access. What sources are you using for these edi...
145193604 by VolkerKrause @ 2023-12-16 18:34	1	2023-12-18 14:04	trigpoint	Fixing cuisine on a demolished:amenity. Did you even look at the other tags? Actually a note to say whats here now would have been more appropriate.
144920829 by JayTurnr @ 2023-12-08 23:35	1	2023-12-09 00:11	trigpoint	Why? This edit looses important information such as those estate agents that deal work hidden away in offices to those who have a Shop Window where properties can be browsed when they are closed. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-12-09 01:18	JayTurnr ♦155	Hi Phil, I don't believe these edits lose any degree of information. Given that the office=estate_agent tag is more popular and the shop=estate_agent wiki page mentions it's been proposed to merge the tags and that every Name Index entry for estate agents uses the more popular office ta...
	3	2023-12-10 14:36	Dave Venables ♦165	I've always (six years) used office = estate_agent in Derby https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127068258 based mainly on the values defaulting from the iD editor; similar to office = lawyer or office = architect even if on the high street I've not edited any estate agents outside of the ...
	4	2023-12-12 20:38	SK53 ♦864	I have always distinguished between the two shop=estate_agent for high street outlets in obvious retail premises where one can walk in browse the listings etc. In the past many were also agents for various financial service companies: I opened my first building society account in an estate agent. I ...
	5	2023-12-13 12:25	trigpoint	As Jerry says, the difference between an office and a shop is an important distinction. There is little point going to an office outside of its opening hours, a shop however will have photos and details of properties displayed in the window which people looking to move browse. Estate agents even ...
	6	2023-12-13 13:30	Dave Venables ♦165	I (and most UK mappers) have always used shop=travel_agent 1860 rather than office = travel_agent 87 (some of the offices might be corporate headquarters) Office seems to be more common for lawyer (2963 : 8), architect (532 : 2) and estate_agent (9351 : 924) Most common values (shop or office...
	7	2023-12-13 13:43	Dave Venables ♦165	World wide office = estate_agent (77205) is used more frequently than shop = estate_agent (4228) but that does not prove that it is correct, just more popular.
	8	2023-12-20 14:53	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 . I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
144910046 by rcro @ 2023-12-08 16:29	1	2023-12-08 20:48	trigpoint	Other than on motorway foot restrictions in the UK are very rare, Foot=no means illegal, not just its not a good idea. Can you provide any actual evidence for these being actual restrictions? For example based on this edit I would expect a sign here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=13405690...
	2	2023-12-08 21:04	rcro ♦2	My apologies - I had both misinterpreted and misremembered. A40/A449/A465 doesn't seem to have signs so I had made those changes in error. Pedestrian restrictions, however, are common on more minor roads in South Wales, especially those built on the old railways - those ones I did check! Thanks...
	3	2023-12-08 22:35	rcro ♦2	I believe I have now reverted the cases where I had applied a tag in error.
	4	2023-12-08 23:58	trigpoint	Thank you
144805983 by Mike_Snell @ 2023-12-05 20:24	1	2023-12-05 22:15	Cebderby ♦300	Node dragged, and blocks vehicle access to about 6 properties, cannot be correct, reverted.
	2	2023-12-05 22:27	Mike_Snell ♦1	Hello Cebderby, I'm was not trying to change vehicle access. I only made a change to show that it is a footpath. The Gwynedd definitive map shows that this is a public footpath. Are you happy for me to change it to a footpath?
	3	2023-12-05 22:34	Cebderby ♦300	If it's a road that also carries a public footpath (presumably using the bridge bit not the ford in the middle?) then leave the highway types as they are, and set the additional tag designation=public_footpath and change to foot=designated on the relevant ways.
	4	2023-12-05 22:51	Mike_Snell ♦1	Hello Cabderby, It's barely a road, more of a foot path, that uses the bridge. I was there today and there is no ford. I'll change the tags as you recommend
	5	2023-12-06 16:44	trigpoint	https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/371992 and https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/372001 looks like a track and a ford to me
	6	2023-12-08 17:10	Mike_Snell ♦1	Hello Trigpoint, yes it does look like a ford in these pictures, however these images are 17 years old. I have been there again and the reason I didn't notice the ford is because it's so overgrown. It's completely impassable by anything other than a bulldozer. When I get a chance I�...
	7	2023-12-08 17:30	Mike_Snell ♦1	https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/7665921 Here is how it looks today
	8	2023-12-08 18:51	trigpoint	Thank you Mike, although now I am more confused as the road/bridge shown in your photo is not mapped?
	9	2023-12-08 19:00	Cebderby ♦300	I did add the designation=public_footpath + foot=designated through here, and drew in the bridged private driveway (it was just visible in the aerial images and on one of the old ford pictures) from what was discussed + shared before. So probably the only thing to choose is what to do with the shor...
	10	2023-12-08 21:27	Mike_Snell ♦1	Hi Cebdery, I'd be reluctant to change the ford, as, while it's unpassable, the council definitive map still shows it as a ford. Hi Trigpoint, don't understand, the road/bridge is clearly mapped? All, anyway, the only reason I got involved is because I'm organising an orienteer...
	11	2023-12-08 21:46	Cebderby ♦300	One other thought Mike, you've added some nice paths through the (mostly) trees area to the south and west. They show as very pale grey on the standard map as they've got access=no which is actually not at all necessary for paths as all motor vehicles are automatically disallowed anyway....
	12	2023-12-08 21:59	Mike_Snell ♦1	Hello Cebderby, Thanks for your help. I've changed the access to permissioned. As luck would have it, on the day I walked the paths, I bumped into a working party from the Woodland Trust. In the working party was the local manager and I spoke to her about the event I was planning and she told m...
143107309 by Sammiisle @ 2023-10-25 10:19	1	2023-12-08 14:37	trigpoint	The sign says "unsuitable for motor vehicles" which in osm should be motor vehicles=discouraged. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/1045307 Obviously only passable at low tide and it is up to drivers to assess their vehicle and conditions and not blindly follow their satnav.
143202344 by Sammiisle @ 2023-10-27 09:35	1	2023-12-08 12:43	trigpoint	What legal restrictions are there of trucks not being allowed to use this road? The only visible signage is that motor vehicles can use it only for access which has been incorrectly mapped as motorcar and motor_cycle. Truck is not a valid tag in osm however I have corrected the tagging to moto...
143116560 by Sammiisle @ 2023-10-25 13:41	1	2023-12-08 10:55	trigpoint	What sources are you using for this edit?
144046816 by Sammiisle @ 2023-11-15 11:05	1	2023-12-08 10:52	trigpoint	Is there a legal restriction here?
143203507 by Sammiisle @ 2023-10-27 09:58	1	2023-12-06 19:17	trigpoint	What are you trying to achieve here? It's unusual to tag a no U-turn that goes back on itself. It seems an odd place to find a legal turn restriction in a location such as this.
	2	2023-12-07 15:14	Sammiisle ♦2	My aim is to restrict 3.5t vehicles from being asked to perform a U turn at this junction as the route is not wide enough
	3	2023-12-07 15:32	trigpoint	Again that should only be used if it is signed, but why would a router tell someone to do a U-turn and go back to where it came from?
	4	2023-12-08 08:33	trigpoint	Why are 3.5t vehicles a special problem?
144830619 by Sammiisle @ 2023-12-06 14:11	1	2023-12-06 18:33	JassKurn ♦154	Hi Sammiisle Do you know this road? I've done mapping in this area, and am aware it, but have not travelled along it. My instinct is that is should be mapped as a track, with appropriate tagging that makes clear it limitations for access eg highway=track lit=no motor_vehicle=disco...
	2	2023-12-07 15:15	Sammiisle ♦2	absolutely, maybe a weight restriction too? its definitely not suitable for our 3.5t vehicles
	3	2023-12-07 15:30	trigpoint	Only if it is legally signed as having such a restriction. We do not add restrictions just because we think it's not suitable. We can add physical restrictions such as the width to inform routers, but maxwidth should only be used if it is a legally signed restriction.
	4	2023-12-09 15:06	JassKurn ♦154	Hi all. I agree with Trigpoint. We restrictions/prohibitions that are signed. And in this case very heavy farm vehicles will be using this road. This is one of numerous roads in Devon that the Devon County Council has now defined as "Track - Green Lane". This means it has the lowest lev...
144794194 by supersellout6907 @ 2023-12-05 14:34	1	2023-12-06 08:23	trigpoint	And the source of these names is? Other than Shrewsbury and Yr Amwythig I have never seen any of these names in use.
	2	2023-12-07 08:14	trigpoint	No response, reverted
144792451 by supersellout6907 @ 2023-12-05 13:42	1	2023-12-07 08:13	trigpoint	How is the weird website you added for Wroxeter in any way related to Wroxeter?
144793521 by supersellout6907 @ 2023-12-05 14:13	1	2023-12-06 08:33	trigpoint	Wat's Dyke Way is already mapped as a relation, it is incorrect to duplicate that name on individual paths. That is not the name of the path, but of one of the routes that passes over it. The names you have added seem unlikely, just because things can be translated doesn't mean they sho...
	2	2023-12-07 00:03	supersellout6907 ♦7	Sorry about that, i was just going off of translations from the Wikipedia page. I just thought it was important to add them for map localization
	3	2023-12-07 00:13	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	Actually, we can't use wikipedia as a source because its licence isn't compatible with OSM. I know that sounds bizarre, but sometimes licensing results in bizarre outcomes. :)
	4	2023-12-07 00:16	trigpoint	Thank you for your reply however Wikipedia is not a valid source for OSM. It it is not released under the correct license. The big question is where did Wikipedia get that information from.
	5	2023-12-07 00:16	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	With regard to path naming, if something's part of a route relation, things can decide whether or not to show it already, like https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#14/52.9975/-3.0157 (disclaimer - I created that).
141155230 by saldenisov @ 2023-09-12 09:59	1	2023-12-06 10:46	trigpoint	Please do not delete wikipedia and wikidata tags, that is vandalism.
144615126 by saldenisov @ 2023-11-30 08:09	1	2023-12-06 10:44	trigpoint	Please do not delete wikipedia and wikidata tags, that is vandalism.
48629348 by trigpoint @ 2017-05-12 17:01	1	2023-12-03 04:54	confusedbuffalo ♦333	See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4012784 Can this be changed to shop=convenience?
	2	2023-12-03 13:24	trigpoint	In this case possibly, will need a survey which I will try this week.
144659574 by donq1986b @ 2023-12-01 11:57	1	2023-12-02 15:55	trigpoint	Paving stones sounds a bit odd here as they are normally used outdoors. I would expect some sort of tiles? Cheers Phil
144261505 by Arctic gnome @ 2023-11-20 20:17	1	2023-11-24 08:56	trigpoint	So what happens when, at least part of, this area becomes UTC+1 for most of the year? Surely to be useful timezones are based on country/state boundaries?
	2	2023-11-27 16:55	Arctic gnome ♦27	The relations for IANA timezones provide that info. For example, Portugal is inside one relation for UTC+0 standard time and another relation for Europe/Lisbon IANA timezone. The UTC-based timezone boundaries are only for standard time and don't take daylight savings into account.
137361731 by IMS DriveSync Support @ 2023-06-15 09:19 Active block	1	2023-11-16 17:03	trigpoint	What is the source of this edit, it feels very unlikely that the speed limit would be increased here and contradicts available open sources?
	2	2023-11-23 10:06	trigpoint	No response after a week so reverting this edit.
136175097 by IMS DriveSync Support @ 2023-05-16 15:38 Active block	1	2023-11-16 17:21	trigpoint	Again what sources are you using for these edits? In this edit you have changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117883015 from 30 mph to 40 mph which now contradicts signage visible in open sources. Why have you made this change? Cheers Phil
	2	2023-11-23 10:02	trigpoint	No response after a week so reverting this edit.
144085088 by IMS DriveSync Support @ 2023-11-16 09:04 Active block	1	2023-11-16 13:44	trigpoint	What is the source of this apparently remote edit? Cheers Phil
	2	2023-11-23 10:01	trigpoint	No response after a week so reverting this edit.
144210578 by deathrayoperator @ 2023-11-19 14:35	1	2023-11-22 11:37	trigpoint	Hi Whilst banks closing is not unusual has it really been demolished? Chances are the building is in use for something else, or maybe empty awaiting a new tennant. Whilst the tags associating it with a bank can be removed, the other tags (building, addr:* and urpn) still remain valid and should ...
	2	2023-11-22 14:03	deathrayoperator ♦1	The building drawn does not correspond to the buildings I saw on the ground, which are a terrace of shops like the rest of the commercial part of this road. There is a small market in the end shop that I would believe had once been the bank but I found the drawing of the building misleading as it im...
	3	2023-11-22 15:41	trigpoint	Surely it would have been better to improve the map by adding the other buildings that make up the terrace, as has been done the other side of Britton Street. I am no sure what you mean by a market, but did you happen to get the name. It would be useful to add it, whatever it is.
	4	2023-11-22 16:01	trigpoint	Wouldn't it be better to have not thrown away the history and address tags and mapped the market? Although I am not really sure what you mean by a market. The market being a large area in the city centre.
	5	2023-11-22 16:15	trigpoint	According to FHRS its called Global Grocers, so grocer or convenience. I will restore the building and fix it.
	6	2023-11-22 17:03	deathrayoperator ♦1	I meant market as in "small shop that sells food" in opposition to a 'supermarket' which is a large shop. I have no where near enough confidence to put a building outline on this map - I barely believe I should be allowed to add points of interest. Apologies for my intrusion. ...
144281687 by IMS DriveSync Support @ 2023-11-21 10:54 Active block	1	2023-11-21 11:39	trigpoint	Precisely what street level imagery are you using?
144169053 by confusedbuffalo @ 2023-11-18 10:44	1	2023-11-18 12:27	trigpoint	Are you sure about this? The original postcode was surveyed using a printed reciept and matches that shown on FHRS and is points right at the garage if you type it into OSM search. NSUL cannot be considered a valid source for armchair edits which break existing survey data. I am reverting t...
	2	2023-11-18 19:28	confusedbuffalo ♦333	I should have put in my changeset comment that I was checking https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/postcode-offsets/ to fix postcodes. This is well within TF9 3.. and the rest of TF9 2JQ is much further down the road, so it was a reasonable change based on that evidence. People and businesses freque...
144140550 by IMS DriveSync Support @ 2023-11-17 13:59 Active block	1	2023-11-17 16:03	trigpoint	Hi You still are not quoting the sources you are using for these changesets or replied to previous comments. Are you sure you have the change in the right place?
	2	2023-11-21 11:37	IMS DriveSync Support Active block	Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
	3	2023-11-21 11:49	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	Can you provide a link to the sources? It's pretty unusual for a speed limit to be raised in this way (though I can think of one similar example).
114555809 by JonFreer @ 2021-12-04 13:58	1	2023-11-17 12:29	trigpoint	What evidence do you have that it is illegal to walk on these roads. Pedestrians being prohibited is extremely rare in the UK and in such cases you will find signs such as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:UK_traffic_sign_625.1.svg. I do not recall such a sign here. Cheers Phil
143683033 by IMS DriveSync Support @ 2023-11-06 09:07 Active block	1	2023-11-17 09:25	trigpoint	Except use of streetview is not allowed for OSM editing, this change needs to be reverted.
144015479 by SuborbitalPigeon @ 2023-11-14 15:26	1	2023-11-15 11:11	Colin Smale ♦319	Was there any discussion about this? I can imagine the Welsh in particular not being happy. It's officially a bilingual country, just like Switzerland or Belgium (they have 4 and 3 official languages respectively).
	2	2023-11-15 11:59	trigpoint	As a Welshman I am wondering why you chose Wales over Cymru, after all it was previously first.
	3	2023-11-15 12:15	SuborbitalPigeon ♦25	Choose one, and leave it like that. I don't care what.
	4	2023-11-15 12:27	SuborbitalPigeon ♦25	Having a look at other places, it's moderately common to have multiple languages in the name field. I can see some sense in this, so I've reverted it again (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14404960) Apologies for being a pain in the arse.
	5	2023-11-15 12:28	SuborbitalPigeon ♦25	Wrong changeset number https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144049602
	6	2023-11-15 12:35	SuborbitalPigeon ♦25	I should point out that my personal dislike of multiple languages in the 'name' tag comes down to the 'tagging for the renderer' concept.
	7	2023-11-15 16:18	trigpoint	In some ways it is tagging for the renderer, but to avoid that you have to make a political decision as to which language should be used.
142593623 by SuborbitalPigeon @ 2023-10-14 21:54	1	2023-10-14 21:56	SuborbitalPigeon ♦25	The 'name' tag should not have multiple languages in it. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name?uselang=en-GB
	2	2023-11-15 11:57	trigpoint	The wiki should be taken with a large pinch of NaCl. It is intended to document how mappers map and not to dictate to mappers. How did you decide that English should be the primary language in these areas?
	3	2023-11-15 12:16	SuborbitalPigeon ♦25	See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Scotland
144014981 by SuborbitalPigeon @ 2023-11-14 15:13	1	2023-11-15 11:46	trigpoint	How in a bilingual country did you decide that you removed the wrong name. Where did you discuss these edits with the community?
	2	2023-11-15 12:18	SuborbitalPigeon ♦25	The other regions have the 'name' tag as English. If you want inconsistent naming, be my guest and revert this.
143411432 by GPSMAP67 @ 2023-10-31 09:54	1	2023-11-14 19:49	trigpoint	Hi These gardens are not just grass, they contain much more, outbuildings? The are certainly not a poorly placed rectangle. Why are you making these poor quality inaccurate changes?
	2	2023-11-14 19:54	GPSMAP67 ♦16	The area is grass gardens hence the green to represent them. Why are you making poor quality comments? What's up going through a dry spell and othing better to do with your time.. 😉
	3	2024-01-11 14:25	SK53 ♦864	The appropriate tag is leisure=garden access=private. NOT landuse=grass. @GPSMAP67: your comment about @trigpoint is inappropriate. I presume this will be reverted by DWG
142446557 by GPSMAP67 @ 2023-10-11 17:33	1	2023-11-14 17:06	trigpoint	Hi I am wondering what you are trying to achieve with these poorly draw landuse=grass areas? The area is certainly not grass, it is mostly arable farmland with wood and buildings. Some of the farmland is already mapped which you have simply made harder to determine.
143835170 by hurguffl @ 2023-11-09 18:46	1	2023-11-10 08:48	trigpoint	Hi This seems very unlikely. What evidence have you that this exists? OSM is a map of the world as it exists, not a place to add fictional data. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-11-10 11:00	kmpoppe ♦97	Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143857330
	3	2023-11-18 09:45	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144167231 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fictional data in England. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15401
143120420 by plonkers @ 2023-10-25 15:00	1	2023-10-25 15:15	trigpoint	Hi, what is the source of this edit? And of course it probably wont happen given very strong local opposition. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-10-26 15:51	trigpoint	No response. Proposals are un-verifiable and do not belong in OSM. Reverted.
	3	2023-10-26 17:27	plonkers ♦25	Evening Phil, apologies for the delayed response. There are numerous uncopyrighted sources available all showing the same route. "Proposals are un-verifiable and do not belong in OSM." .... In that case, surely the proposed tag as a whole shouldn't be recognised? Lots of other p...
	4	2023-10-29 12:12	trigpoint	> There are numerous uncopyrighted sources available all showing the same route. I have not found one that has your level of detail, You haven't said which you used? > "Proposals are un-verifiable and do not belong in OSM." .... In that case, surely the proposed tag as a who...
108839766 by CraigW @ 2021-07-29 17:42	1	2023-10-28 13:07	trigpoint	Hi I am concerned that you have deleted the existing rights of way from this development. Why? Cheers Phil
143145145 by Releaf Medical Cannabis @ 2023-10-26 06:16	1	2023-10-26 16:07	trigpoint	Spam reverted
142494510 by Pete Owens @ 2023-10-12 19:30	1	2023-10-15 10:25	trigpoint	Hi, just wondering what sources you used for this edit, did you actually survey new signage or is it just an armchair guess?  A short stretch of 20mph for a roundabout on the A483 looks odd and actually surveying it does confirm it is odd, the A483 remains at 30 mph. The new 20 mph signs being ...
	2	2023-10-19 19:26	Pete Owens ♦55	I am using the Welsh government map of exceptions: https://datamap.gov.wales/maps/roads-affected-by-changes-to-the-speed-limit-on-re/view#/ It looks like I missed that one. Waiting for someone to get round to locating every individual sign post will mean that the map will continue to be incorr...
142424263 by borovac @ 2023-10-11 07:53	1	2023-10-11 08:09	trigpoint	Hi This edit seems a bit odd. Firstly the changeset comment is misleading as it does not touch any roads but more importantly you have deleted a large number of buildings. Why? Cheers Phil
	2	2023-10-11 08:14	borovac ♦103	Hi Phil, I deleted a large amount of buildings because every building had duplicate geometry. Yes the comment should have been to remove duplicate building geometry. All best Milan
	3	2023-10-11 08:18	borovac ♦103	Hi, All the buildings were like this one, (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147509546) with exactly the same double geometry. All best Milan
	4	2023-10-11 08:54	trigpoint	Thank you
142302194 by Borbus @ 2023-10-08 12:09	1	2023-10-08 14:22	trigpoint	Bore da You are a bit behind the times, the park authority changed the name to Eryri in February, so the name was correct. I am therefore reverting this https://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/yr-wyddfa-eryri-take-precedence-25534108
	2	2023-10-08 14:32	Borbus ♦31	I didn't change name, I changed name:en. The park authority does not have the power to change the English language. I was in Eryri/Snowdonia recently and I can confirm it's still called Snowdonia when people are speaking English.
141555240 by yngndrw @ 2023-09-21 11:45	1	2023-09-24 13:12	trigpoint	Hi, just wondering what sources you are using for these edits. Surveys to find and only map fire hydrants seems a lot of work. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-09-24 14:57	yngndrw ♦1	Hi Phil, the changes I'm making are all in my local area. I'm using a combination of Google Street View to find the hydrant signs and from there locating the hydrants themselves. In some cases the location of the hydrant is not obvious so I've either marked them with a fix-me note or ...
	3	2023-09-24 19:08	trigpoint	Hi Andrew Thank you, however using Google Streetview for OSM is against Google's terms of use. You should not look at it when mapping. Edits involving it should be reverted. Sorry to be so harsh, but when it comes to sources OSM needs to be skeaky clean. Cheers Phil
	4	2023-09-24 19:22	yngndrw ♦1	Hi Phil, I have passed every single one of these hydrant signs myself many times in person either by car or on foot. (Just passed a few now while walking our dog) Using street view to refresh my memory is not an issue in my view - Google do not have a monopoly on my memory after all, even though the...
	5	2023-09-24 20:15	trigpoint	Andrew, unfortunately refreshing your memory is an issue according to google terms of use and OSM mapping guidelines. We are a volunteer project and cannot afford to be anything other than squeaky clean. If you see things when out why not take a photo of them or you can use open data sources such...
	6	2023-09-24 20:34	trigpoint	Or try an app such as streetcomplete which allows you to map whilst looking at the object
	7	2023-09-24 21:28	yngndrw ♦1	Hi Phil, I have recently seen all of these hydrant locations, in person - Just this weekend I've passed about half of them and I've passed every single one of them over the past month. You should consider them to have been personally visited and verified by eye. Thanks, -Andrew.
141690806 by LudovicG @ 2023-09-24 16:41	1	2023-09-24 16:45	trigpoint	Doesn't it also sell steaks as suggested by the name?
	2	2023-09-26 19:07	LudovicG ♦68	May be :)
141658061 by Velella @ 2023-09-23 19:13	1	2023-09-24 16:35	trigpoint	Bore da Just wondering why you have changed the name of Ynys Dewi away from the local language name? Diolch Phil
141108704 by Eliiia @ 2023-09-11 11:58	1	2023-09-17 16:56	trigpoint	What does the camra tag mean? Cheers Phil
	2	2023-09-17 20:24	Eliiia ♦4	Refers to whether the pub is in the CAMRA Good Beer guide, see under additional tags in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpub
	3	2023-09-17 20:51	trigpoint	Got it, in GBG
	4	2023-09-17 21:12	trigpoint	I think it is more of a foodie pub than a restaurant, however dogs=unleashed seems strange where food is served.
	5	2023-09-20 20:15	Eliiia ♦4	I was unsure of whether to say it's a foodie pub or a restaurant 😅, most tables tend to order drinks however I'd say a solid 90% of them come with the intention to eat. Dogs are indeed allowed unleashed inside and outside, although dogs aren't allowed at all in 2 of the 4 open room...
141308818 by GongGobbler23 @ 2023-09-15 15:39	1	2023-09-15 18:21	Sandal man ♦391	Hello, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. Why? Have a look at the section "Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset Thank you.
	2	2023-09-15 19:29	GongGobbler23 ♦3	I'll take note of that, thanks for letting me know!
	3	2023-09-17 13:21	trigpoint	Also the concept of StreetComplete is that you mke edits that you can see in front of you. How were you able to make changes in both the US and Germany?
	4	2023-09-17 16:35	GongGobbler23 ♦3	I was travelling in the US and that was when I had finally decided to contribute to OSM and downloaded StreetComplete. Yet I didn't bother with making an account until I got back to Germany. That's also why those international edits are bundled together.
55407552 by Mao-PU @ 2018-01-13 14:16	1	2023-09-15 15:27	trigpoint	I spotted this blunder today when OSMand informed me that the speed limit on Western Approach is 70 mph, a bit odd for a city centre road Not sure why but you tagged is as maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_dual which is clearly very wrong. Please sanity check your edits. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-09-15 15:50	Mao-PU ♦5	Thanks for checking this. I don't remember the details from 5 years back, but I think StreetComplete at the time asked if there was a visible sign for speed limit. I checked on sight and reported a "no". Since this is a not really a city center road, but rather a speedway (multi-lane...
	3	2023-09-17 11:32	trigpoint	The quest is very badly designed, it seems obsessed with there being a sign and allows an answer "there is no sign" when in reality there is always a sign which will be at the edge of the zone. In this case it could be a couple of miles away.
141092034 by Ganesh Bhardwaj @ 2023-09-11 05:58	1	2023-09-13 15:32	trigpoint	Hi What is the source you are using for these edits. An urban primary road isn't going to have a toll so I am unsure how this improves routing. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-09-15 05:44	Maneesh-Mahlawat ♦5	Yes, it is a mistake that Ganesh Bhardwaj made. I talked to the user. Thank you for reverting this change
	3	2023-09-15 07:36	trigpoint	Thank you, however their profile is still not compliant with organised editing guidelines.
	4	2023-09-15 12:57	Maneesh-Mahlawat ♦5	I agree. I am trying to fix that
	5	2023-09-16 07:08	Udarian ♦411	I am a little confused here, Maneesh Mahlawat you said "Thank you for reverting this change" yet this data is still there, who reverted what, I dont see any such reverts.
	6	2023-09-17 10:23	trigpoint	I never said I reverted the change. I suspect that all edits by this group of mappers need to be reverted as they have made so many errors. I feel it is unlikely that the US community will have missed things like toll tags.
	7	2023-09-23 16:07	clay_c ♦489	These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141651612
141215130 by Ganesh Bhardwaj @ 2023-09-13 14:37	1	2023-09-15 07:33	trigpoint	You are still not compliant with the organised editing guidelines. Please fix your profile. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-09-18 11:39	mkopinsky ♦55	This changeset is not correct. From Bing Streetside it seems that Powhite Parkway is not tolled west of VA 288. https://www.tollroadsinvirginia.com/Facility/PowhiteParkway/ shows the tolled section as ending east of that junction. And the toll plaza is a mile down the road - https://www.openstreetma...
121845871 by Misa_zumba @ 2022-06-02 10:27	1	2023-09-01 15:14	trigpoint	Hi The wikipedia and wikidata tags you added refer to the hospital object, not a single building. The wikidata tag already existed on the hospital object and I have added the wikipedia tag there. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-10-04 13:56	Misa_zumba ♦40	Hi Phil, Thanks for taking care of this. I have overlooked the area. Sorry for the late reply. I'll pay more attention in the future. Thanks, Misa_zumba
140679361 by Velocity01 @ 2023-09-01 13:16	1	2023-09-01 15:00	trigpoint	Hi again Postcodes are not required on individual buildings as they are on the outer hospital object. Are you mapping from the US? Cheers Phil
140578679 by Velocity01 @ 2023-08-30 09:39	1	2023-09-01 12:49	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to osm however your edits have gone a little bit wrong. In OSM we follow the rule "One feature, one OSM element", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element Your edits have broken that, Captain Tom's Garden is a garden, not a hospital, there ...
	2	2023-09-01 12:55	Velocity01 ♦2	Hi Phil, I have been a google mapper for the last 48 months and completed most of the edits they approve, some they have cancelled for reason unbeknown. I am now trying to edit the Estate Footprint on OSM and technically on a try and learn basis as no courses available. Kr Alex NHS Travel plann...
	3	2023-09-01 13:19	trigpoint	Thank you, I have removed the duplicate hospital tags and added the correct tags where they exist such as here. I have not removed any nodes but have left some with just a name. We do not have a scheme for mapping the internals of a hospital in OSM beyond things lke mapping Shropdoc as a doctors ...
140384576 by Nathaniel Hillman @ 2023-08-25 18:31	1	2023-08-26 15:34	trigpoint	Hello, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits however I am concerned that the tagging of these paths may cause problems for some map users. The name Craig Pennant Scramble implies that a walker may need to use their hands, which is not the general understanding of a path. The wiki page at...
	2	2023-08-26 16:52	Nathaniel Hillman ♦1	Hi Phil, Thanks so much for your comment, I really appreciate experienced users checking what I've done. I was not aware of how to add those tags, myself - thanks for the pointers. I can probably add them to a large number of paths across Snowdonia if I find they are missing. Regardin...
	3	2023-08-26 18:40	trigpoint	Hi Nathaniel Probably not removed but the tagging should be correct. I am not sure of the tagging however you will get advice from the mailing list. Cheers Phil
	4	2023-08-26 18:48	Nathaniel Hillman ♦1	Hi Phil, I've tagged it as an alpine hiking path as appears to be standard for grade 1s in the area and according to the wiki page you sent me, and added hiking difficulty tags to other major paths on the Nantlle ridge. Thanks, Nathaniel
140310173 by James Baber @ 2023-08-24 08:39	1	2023-08-24 09:06	trigpoint	Hi, this looks a little odd. What legal signage is there here? It looks like it is intended to access properties. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-08-25 15:23	James Baber ♦1	It's now showing up on Google maps as a multi-month closure. It has been barricaded by the developers.
	3	2023-08-25 15:47	trigpoint	Thank you however you shouldn't be looking at Google maps when mapping in OSM, it is against their terms of use. We do not normally map short term closures such as this because many data consumers only take OSM data very rarely and the closure can persist on maps long after it has been reope...
	4	2023-08-25 16:26	Cebderby ♦300	A quick search suggests this is long planned and permanent, it gets a mention here: https://www.glanllyn-newport.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/newsletter-spring-2022.pdf which includes the text (as of 1+ year ago): "we are bringing forward plans to close the junction between Bloomery Ci...
140317282 by S281 @ 2023-08-24 11:18 Active block	1	2023-08-24 12:48	trigpoint	Again what is the source of these dates? Whilst Jubilee Way could well have opened in 2014, Barrow Street has existed forever. To what ends are you making these edits? Cheers Phil
	2	2023-08-24 19:05	yasslay ♦93	I’m going to be honest. These edits are complete and utter rubbish. Jubilee Way did not open in 2014. Although incompatible with OSM, historical Google Earth imagery show that the road has existed since the 1990s… 😐 This needs to stop now.
	3	2023-08-24 19:38	trigpoint	Exactly, from looking at the sabre wiki which says that the A6 was routed this way in 2014, not that the road opened in 2014. These edits need to be reverted.
	4	2023-08-29 05:50	Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134	Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import, possibly using unauthorised data sources & also lack of response https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522672
140327004 by S281 @ 2023-08-24 14:36 Active block	1	2023-08-24 15:25	trigpoint	Sabre roads isn't an acceptable source for OSM. It doesn't make clear what license it is released under and contains no information as to where the information was obtained from.
	2	2023-08-29 05:50	Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134	Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import, possibly using unauthorised data sources & also lack of response https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522672
140298176 by S281 @ 2023-08-24 00:53 Active block	1	2023-08-24 07:58	trigpoint	Hi, what is the source of all of the opening dates you are adding. They are all over the country which suggests something other than local knowledge? Also are you sure Crusader Island opened 8 years after it was mapped? Cheers Phil
	2	2023-08-24 09:38	Cebderby ♦300	There are also highway type changes hidden in these changesets, not described in the changeset comments, typically favouring 'unclassified' over previously set residential and tertiary choices.
	3	2023-08-24 12:49	SK53 ♦864	I'm going to revert this as it is completely inaccurate. The Crusader Island was constructed way before this to enable servicing of the two estates built either side of the A453 which needed better access than that provided previously when Clifton Lane was a more minor road. It was in exist...
	4	2023-08-29 05:50	Fizzie-DWG ♦32,134	Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import, possibly using unauthorised data sources & also lack of response https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522672
140268641 by Chris112233 @ 2023-08-23 10:28	1	2023-08-24 07:01	trigpoint	Hi Chris Please keep your changes to sensible areas, this has created a massive change boundary making it difficult for local mappers to see your changes. This changeset should have been split between the changes in Staffordshire and those made in Powis. Please save before moving to another area...
118317384 by arhemon @ 2022-03-10 10:37	1	2023-08-22 08:05	trigpoint	What was the driver driving? Cheers Phil
	2	2023-08-22 08:37	trigpoint	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039032029#map=18/52.71145/-2.51578 is the link I am questioning. Am 100% sure there is no link to the primary.
139705263 by Vas111 @ 2023-08-10 12:38	1	2023-08-10 13:58	DaveF ♦1,566	Hi 1. Please try & avoid connecting physical objects to boundaries which in this case is a separate entity. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11104712574#map=19/51.39926/-2.37140 2. For reference/validation purposes it's probably best to put edits as separated as Bath & Scotland i...
	2	2023-08-10 18:54	Vas111 ♦84	Hello, please pardon the carelessness, honestly didn't notice how I merged the point. I saw other editors do what I did in terms of not separating edit regions & thought it was comme il faut, although now I realise those are automated edits. Thank you for letting me know
	3	2023-08-14 13:22	DaveF ♦1,566	Hi If the changeset consists of a singular amendment on multiple examples of the same type of object, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139821055, then a GB wide changeset is OK, but, as in your case, with different types of amendments it's probably best to split them.
	4	2023-08-21 12:53	trigpoint	Is there any valid reason that Kingwood School should have name:be/ru/uk beyond Kings Wood can be translated into any number of languages. I could translate it into name:fr and name:cy but that doesn't mean I should as there is no actual usage. I have seen silly English names added in OSM wh...
	5	2023-08-21 22:37	Vas111 ♦84	I added name:be/ru/uk for internationalisation, it's not an exact transliteration of "Kingswood School". If one were speaking those languages, they would refer to the school as translated. Obviously no one would call the boulevard in Berlin "Under the Lindens" in English; I ...
101321883 by hofoen @ 2021-03-19 10:50	1	2023-08-20 13:21	trigpoint	Wrong bridge, read the description. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-08-21 06:13	hofoen ♦56	You're right, I should have read that more carefully. Thank you.
140057949 by hofoen @ 2023-08-18 13:17	1	2023-08-20 11:06	trigpoint	Are sure about this? This is a modern footbridge, built when the A55 was built. The historic bridge was demolished in 2000. The references to CADW on the wikipedia page do not exist suggest the wikidata page is outdated/fictional. A listed structure crossing a modern expressway really shoul...
	2	2023-08-20 12:19	SK53 ♦864	I've changed this to not:wikidata. The stucture visible in Bing Streetside is clearly not a "dual arched masonry bridge of 1849". As trigpoint says this was demolished when the dual carriageway was built. For heritage details the wikidata tag is not really adequate on it's own...
	3	2023-08-21 06:09	hofoen ♦56	Thank you for fixing this. But usually, having a Wikidata tag is better than no Wikidata tag - if it's right, of course. Everyone is free to add more tags afterwards. But through my mistake we were even able to improve the Wikidata entry. Thanks
140123136 by redwoods @ 2023-08-20 09:09	1	2023-08-20 10:23	trigpoint	Please don't do that. The park certainly doesn't end at the centreline of the path. It either stops where it did, or should have been extended to end the other side of that path. Glueing landuse to the centreline of highways just makes editing more difficult for other mappers. Cheer...
138677492 by David White professor @ 2023-07-18 16:16	1	2023-08-19 19:21	trigpoint	Personal note, reverted
138679828 by David White professor @ 2023-07-18 17:08	1	2023-08-19 19:20	trigpoint	Reverted
140049267 by David White professor @ 2023-08-18 09:50	1	2023-08-19 18:07	trigpoint	Museum already tagged with fee=yes. Name should be an acual name, not a price. We do not tag these in OSM. Reverted
140010498 by David White professor @ 2023-08-17 12:25	1	2023-08-19 12:43	trigpoint	Please don't make edits such as this. The Bishops Palace is already tagged with fee=yes and I am sure there is no ticket office here called 5 pounds.
139799982 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-08-12 19:22	1	2023-08-13 17:20	SK53 ♦864	Please dont do this. I explained why you should not on the OSM-UK Loomio site. The wiki is incorrect!
	2	2023-08-13 17:31	Aleksandar Matejevic ♦199	I was not using Wiki, I have been using OS OpenMap Local, Mapillary, and what is already with the operator tag of the University of Leicester. I will go over their website to check what is wrong.
	3	2023-08-14 11:06	trigpoint	Why is St Georges Tower https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89674881 included? Cheers Phil
	4	2023-08-14 19:17	Aleksandar Matejevic ♦199	Hi Phil, I have included it because per OS Open Data University of Leicester International Study Centre should be located in this office building
139832345 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-08-13 16:18	1	2023-08-13 16:29	trigpoint	Hi Where were these edits discussed with the community? They seem to fall into the category https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories. The UK has a very active comm
	2	2023-08-13 16:34	trigpoint	The UK has a very active community and this type of edit should have been consulted. I am not sure what this relation achieves, we already have the data which can easily be found with https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1yRS I also wonder why, if these relations are a good idea, they weren't crea...
	3	2023-08-13 17:05	Aleksandar Matejevic ♦199	Hi Phil, thanks for your comment and interest in this topic. Yes, I have been involved in discussions about creating relations with the universities in the UK on a couple of channels. The community was against changing current tagging since many universities are using OSM for their website map...
	4	2023-08-13 18:03	trigpoint	I do remember the loomio thread now. Rereading it nobody said it was a good idea. In fact sk53 explained very well why you shouldn't make such relations.
139777624 by redwoods @ 2023-08-12 08:28	1	2023-08-13 16:02	trigpoint	Hi Redwoods Just to make you aware that in this changeset you dragged https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1519211300/history to the junction of Rutland Street and Humberstone Gate. Please be careful to check and review your edits before you upload. This has been fixed. Cheers Phil
139525706 by Bigsheep1234 @ 2023-08-06 17:28	1	2023-08-09 08:24	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edits however this changeset has gone very wrong. These roads are not primary. The A458 through Welshpool is trunk (green signs). Salop Road is now just tertiary (it has no ref signs anymore) since the A458 trunk route moved to Mill Street. I surveyed it m...
	2	2023-08-09 18:51	trigpoint	Trunk roads restored
139313349 by vtrtsxlegend @ 2023-08-01 18:33	1	2023-08-03 12:43	trigpoint	Hi This edit is incorrect. This is a circular one way road, not a roundabout. The roads joining have standard give way markings, not roundabout entry markings. It was correctly mapped before and needs to be reverted. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-08-07 11:34	vtrtsxlegend ♦20	Hi Phil, Thank you for the feedback and explanation. Could this be defined as a traffic circle? Cheers. Chris
	3	2023-08-07 11:42	trigpoint	It cannot be defined as a traffic circle. It is just a one way road. Cheers Phil
	4	2023-08-07 11:51	trigpoint	Apart from there is no concept of traffic circles in the UK. Junction=circular is used on roundabouts with traffic lights although routers treat them exactly the same as roundabouts. Cheers Phil
	5	2023-08-07 13:48	vtrtsxlegend ♦20	Thanks Phil. Good info and advice. Cheers. Chris
138953178 by SK@ @ 2023-07-24 18:07	1	2023-08-05 16:10	trigpoint	Hi after discussion with others in the UK community and noting the changeset comment on version #18 stating it is the mainline of the A14 we believe that this edit should be reverted back to trunk. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-08-05 16:21	SK@ ♦5	I'm in my phone right now but when I log in to edit next (tomorrow-Sunday) I'll update this per your feedback. Thanks for helping me learn and for being nice about it. Appreciate it. SK
	3	2023-08-05 17:05	trigpoint	Thank you
139394610 by vtrtsxlegend @ 2023-08-03 13:30	1	2023-08-04 13:18	trigpoint	Again this edit is incorrect. There is no junction=circular here. It is just a dual carriageway with double cross-cuts. The direction is also incorrect. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140650910 should be trunk_link. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-08-05 12:14	trigpoint	Fixed after community discussion
	3	2023-08-07 11:39	vtrtsxlegend ♦20	Hi Phil, Thank you again for the feedback and explanation. Taking a good look at this junction again I can clearly see now that this is not a roundabout and clearly a mistake by me. Thank you for making the corrections. Cheers. Chris
139313661 by vtrtsxlegend @ 2023-08-01 18:43	1	2023-08-03 17:07	trigpoint	Again not a roundabout, should be junction=circular as it has traffic lights. Cheers Phil
139311725 by vtrtsxlegend @ 2023-08-01 17:49	1	2023-08-03 16:43	trigpoint	Hi again This is also not a roundabout, its not a junction=circular either. Imagery shows give way markings so just a oneway road. On streetside imagery you can see there is a parking lane on the right, which confirms it is not a roundabout. Cheers Phil
139256521 by Aleks-Berlin @ 2023-07-31 14:16	1	2023-08-01 12:01	trigpoint	Bore da This edit has gone very wrong. It was correct before you changed it, now it points to the wrong page Diolch Phil
	2	2023-08-01 12:52	Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660	note that this edit seems fine! See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/258591380/history problem comes from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139266839
	3	2023-08-01 12:59	Aleks-Berlin ♦482	Hi trigpoint, thank for this. I only checked the last change. KR, Alex
	4	2023-08-01 14:45	trigpoint	Sorry Alex, I meant to comment on the version after yours. Cheers Phil
139178518 by VastFolly @ 2023-07-29 15:37	1	2023-07-31 12:03	trigpoint	Hi, this edit does not make a lot of sense. It now says name=Asda brand=Spar, which is it? Cheers Phil
	2	2023-07-31 13:50	VastFolly ♦1	Hi Thanks for sorting this, Phil. My mistake. I've only recently come back to OSM. It is (now) an ASDA store, selling ASDA brand.
139111852 by Yunan973 @ 2023-07-28 00:50	1	2023-07-28 17:24	trigpoint	Bore da This edit has gone a little wrong and has lost important information. Have you visited and seen something that has recently changed? In merging 'identical' ways together you have also merged the way that connected them which is not identical, https://www.openstreetmap.org/wa...
	2	2023-07-29 20:18	Yunan973 ♦72	Oups, sorry : I changed this because incoherences between the culvert and the canal area = the last one was drawn with a width of 5 meters under the bridge, incoherent with the culvert. So I improved that area but in the wrong way. I just made other changes, hope it's better https://www.o...
	3	2023-07-29 21:09	Yunan973 ♦72	I remember why I chose the bad solution : the bridge. A bridge means open space under it. A culvert means earth around it so no space under the bridge. So to have a bridge and a culvert is incoherent too. The bridge + the canal is coherent, the bridge+the canal+the culvert is incoherent. I preferr...
	4	2023-07-30 10:51	trigpoint	Thank you. My suspicion is that this never was a bridge. Carreghofa Lane originally crossed bridge 93, which now carries the cycleway slightly to the west. This needs a survey, which I will do if it stops raining for long enough, but my suspicion is that the bridge and note tags should be remov...
	2	2023-07-12 13:32	trigpoint	Comments directed at Krako73. The description is very clear and gives accurate information. Culterted does imply there is no connection, beyond water flow through the culterts. Unfortunately the reopening of the canal was not taken into account when the A483 was built.
	3	2023-07-13 10:15	Pedro W8 ♦1	Thanks trigpoint. The culverts were put in to allow water flow to the low point at Red Bridge south of Arddleen. Canoes can use the canal but pass the culverts by walking around the obstruction. The full re-opening of the canal is a long job but is progressing well. New bridges require raising the r...
134788105 by juergita @ 2023-04-11 19:31	1	2023-07-12 08:51	trigpoint	Hi When you surveyed this pub you missed the most important payment tag which is where it differs from most pubs, payment:cash=no. Cheers Phil
138309352 by SpagBol42 @ 2023-07-09 19:36	1	2023-07-10 15:17	trigpoint	Hi, please keep your changes to smaller areas. This one covers much of the UK and Ireland and makes it difficult for local mappers to track changes in their area. Also please sanity check your changes, for example name=Texaco brand=Gulf doesn't make a lot of sense. https://www.openstreetmap....
	2	2023-07-10 15:50	SpagBol42 ♦1	Hi, here I've just been following the Pic4Review site, which sets tasks to fill in missing detail by using auto matched Mapillary street images to the missing items. There are challenges set over many locations and you have no control over the next one selected, which is possibly why this chan...
	3	2023-07-10 17:49	trigpoint	Ok, I see what is going on now. I had only spotted the edit button, which takes you into the OSM editor and allows you to save each edit. However there is an I button on the page, which shows the existing tags, some of which may be outdated. For example the name, as in this case. Brand is a...
	4	2023-07-10 17:58	SpagBol42 ♦1	Just following the challenges set. There isn't the ability to edit the name too as you submit the brand, as its supposed to be quick fire, just submitting the one missing value - here being brand. At least from mobile this is the experience. Not sure if there's a different view from deskto...
	5	2023-07-10 18:08	trigpoint	Ah, hadn't thought of phones. There is no edit on the phone although the details button is there. Also no obvious way to get control of mapillary. With most images are forward facing so you need to be a few back not right on top of it.
138067914 by Cebderby @ 2023-07-03 14:37	1	2023-07-08 12:05	trigpoint	Hi As the mapper who originally mapped Markfield I am baffled where you dug up https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1186871119 from as it had ceased to exist before I left Markfield in 2011. It was always a useful cut through to the village and was well used bt George customers. There was a lif...
	2	2023-07-09 11:15	Cebderby ♦300	Hi Phil, There's a footpath-sized gap between the property boundaries on the Cadastral layer, but I've deleted this (non) way now, thanks. Cebderby (Clive)
	3	2023-07-10 15:18	trigpoint	Thank you Phil
137460892 by mmcd0 @ 2023-06-17 20:49	1	2023-06-25 20:15	Ian1234_frog ♦2	I believe your edit has removed a route designated as a public bridleway (i.e. with legal status). As the route went through a river (via a ford) and across a heavily overgrown field I can understand why it isn't used for routing. However, the routing software should make use of the data availa...
	2	2023-07-04 18:25	trigpoint	What were you traying to cross the ford with? The ford certainly looks passable with a horse, tractor or the right Land Rover. See https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2980140
137443454 by Mapd123 @ 2023-06-17 11:10	1	2023-06-21 18:03	trigpoint	Why have you removed the town hall and government tags from Edinburgh House. It is the office of the town council.
137006853 by ohmanger @ 2023-06-06 09:46	1	2023-06-11 11:40	trigpoint	Thank you for this edit. Did you happen to spot the orange waymarks for the Shropshire Way? Thanks Phil
	2	2023-06-12 09:02	ohmanger ♦39	I'll add the small bit that I remember but I don't think it followed the path we went. Facepalmed when I realised none of it was mapped as I usually take pictures of the markers.
137140833 by NTTrailsLSE @ 2023-06-09 14:44	1	2023-06-09 15:16	trigpoint	Hi Olivia Access tags are unnecessary on public roads, they are just stating the default case. That is why I removed them. Cheers Phil
136754547 by English Phil @ 2023-05-30 16:32	1	2023-05-31 13:17	trigpoint	Bore da What is the source of this edit? Prohibiting motor vehicles on an unclassified highway seems unlikely. How do farmers access their land? The road looks like it is well surfaced, which again makes a prohibition on motor vehicles seem unlikely. Diolch Phil
	2	2023-06-09 15:12	trigpoint	No response so have reverted this edit
136807816 by Paul Martin @ 2023-05-31 22:40	1	2023-06-04 15:27	trigpoint	Hi Paul This bridge looks a bit long? Cheers Phil
136927990 by Shake71 @ 2023-06-04 10:43	1	2023-06-04 12:57	jxpsert ♦87	This is a massive editing area. It's generally not appreciated to make changes in multiple continents at once.
	2	2023-06-04 13:00	trigpoint	You have two pubs with the same name at the same location. Why?
	3	2023-06-04 16:53	silversurfer83 ♦3,417	Hello Shake71, dear colleagues, change set metadata suggest this edit was made using the app "maps.me" which allows editing POIs. Sadly, there are frequently users of this app that misunderstand the feature "add X to map" as a personal note book feature when in reality this wi...
130039784 by NTTrailsLSE @ 2022-12-13 15:00	1	2023-06-01 09:34	trigpoint	Bore da Just wondering why you have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396445808 as illegal to ride a bike or a horse? It appears to be just a normal unclassified road. Diolch Phil
	2	2023-06-01 10:31	NTTrailsLSE ♦12	Hi Phil, Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I have reached out to the local ranger to understand whether this was a mistake in the original mapping session, or whether it was marked as 'no' on the basis that access is discouraged for those modes of transport on this way. Will g...
	3	2023-06-01 10:42	trigpoint	Thank you Olivia Please remember that no means illegal, not discouraged. However this road is part of NCN 82 so even discouraging bikes would be wrong. As for horses it would be very unusual to discourage them on a public road. Cheers Phil
	4	2023-06-09 14:01	Richard ♦220	I cycled this road a few years back - I don't recall any signs forbidding motor vehicles or horses, and as Phil says it's part of NCN 82 (Lon Las Cymru alternate braid) so bikes certainly aren't forbidden. If there's signage such as "Unsuitable for motor vehicles" yo...
	5	2023-06-09 14:44	NTTrailsLSE ♦12	Hi! Thank you both for the comments and bringing this to our attention. I've just had confirmation from our local NT ranger that this was marked as no bike / horse access by mistake and is in fact an unclassified minor road open to all traffic. This has now been corrected in OSM. NB: Due to...
136293845 by aepunavy @ 2023-05-19 10:50	1	2023-05-20 16:53	trigpoint	Hi, this edit has gone rather wrong. Firstly, and whilst the turn restriction is sort of correct, as in going from Langley Avenue to Abbey Lane you would not be allowed to turn right, but neither would you if coming from Abbey Rise. So the restriction would just need to be a normal via-node restr...
	2	2023-05-21 11:17	trigpoint	Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136367650
	3	2023-05-22 10:47	aepunavy ♦14	Hello trigpoint, Thank you for reviewing the edits and making the necessary corrections. We apologize for adding incorrect turn restrictions. Going forward, we are committed to exercising extra caution when adding turn restrictions to prevent similar errors from occurring again. Thank you agai...
136315471 by BradleySans @ 2023-05-19 20:21	1	2023-05-20 09:43	trigpoint	Hi Just wondering what source you used for this edit? Did you actually visit the location? Cheers Phil
	2	2023-05-20 09:51	BradleySans ♦1	I didn't visit, however I recognise the name of the shop as it's one branch of a chain, therefore I was able to change the tag from shop=yes to the more specific value of a casino. Is this not accurate? Is there a different value used for this sort of place? Thanks
	3	2023-05-20 09:57	BradleySans ♦1	Checking the wiki, it seems that leisure=adult_gaming_centre is more accurate for this sort of small place. I'll change it to that. Sorry, and thanks for pointing out my mistake, Bradley
	4	2023-05-20 11:22	trigpoint	Or it could be leisure=amusement_arcade, but this needs a survey. After 8 years are you sure it even still exists? Or has the same name? Armchairing away problems such as shop=yes only makes it harder for local mappers to find and correctly update these problems. Cheers Phil
136218634 by spielmops @ 2023-05-17 15:32	1	2023-05-19 08:03	trigpoint	Hi This looks very much like a caravan park to me. Has it been redeveloped? Cheers Phil
	2	2023-05-26 15:39	spielmops ♦6	What you call a caravan park und a park of "mobile homes", that ist a holyday home with 2 wheels. That is for Openstreetmap a "chalet", which does not mean a primitive timber-hut high in the switzerland mountains. So this park is a resort with chalets. The Icon for caravan-par...
136011187 by DrUseful @ 2023-05-12 10:12	1	2023-05-14 11:00	trigpoint	Bore da Welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits. We normally tag a road signed as unsuitable for motors as motor_vehicle=discouraged. Permissive is incorrect in this case. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-05-16 12:52	DrUseful ♦1	Diolch am eich neges, Phil. I've updated as advised here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136168030 Hwyl, Steve.
135870840 by Wookey @ 2023-05-08 22:24	1	2023-05-09 11:58	trigpoint	Please capitalize names properly. Also tags should be in English, so Alan Maylor's shop should simply be shop=flooring. Never seem anyone comma separate Welsh before in a tag. Cheers Phil
135873805 by Wookey @ 2023-05-09 01:14	1	2023-05-09 11:53	trigpoint	Hi Rather than map the post office and as a semicolon separated amenity it is normal to map them as separate objects. The postbox should usually be a separate node outside. LLeyn is an odd spelling for Llŷn, which is actually what got my attention. Cheers Phil
105127533 by kerr smith @ 2021-05-22 10:44	1	2023-05-07 09:28	trigpoint	Hi Just wondering why you separated the trig point and the summit. In reality they are a single object and should follow the OSM rule https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element Cheers Phil
	2	2024-03-24 15:29	kerr smith ♦5	Hi Phil, I separated the peak from the survey point as I read that this would highlight the fact that the survey point was placed in an exact location and so even if it appeared out of alignment with the satellite imagery it would probably not be accidentally moved. As the peak is a separate n...
125306942 by ohmanger @ 2022-08-24 09:52	1	2023-05-07 09:05	trigpoint	Hi What does direction=200 mean on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5180229018 ? Cheers Phil
	2	2023-05-07 12:18	ohmanger ♦39	It is just used to indicate the general direction of the viewpoint in degrees. It could probably be changed here to include a more specific range. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=viewpoint?uselang=en-GB#Direction_of_view
135693458 by redwoods @ 2023-05-04 10:03	1	2023-05-04 16:14	trigpoint	Hi This seems a very odd place for a doctors, a node in the middle of a pedestrian street in a park. What are you trying to achieve?
132262574 by Fradeve11 @ 2023-02-08 15:32	1	2023-05-03 23:40	trigpoint	Hi This edit has gone a wrong. The website was correct and for some reason you removed the https://. Just wondering why?
	2	2023-07-10 13:12	Fradeve11 ♦19	Hi, sorry about the late reply. The issue was introduced by an update I did through MapRoulette, which is used to help importing data provided by the Government into OSM. The data had no HTTP in the first place, and it was imported "as it is", effectively removing HTTPS. I see that so...
135532977 by adioan @ 2023-04-30 11:19	1	2023-05-01 10:34	trigpoint	Hi Welcome to OSM and thank you for adding the Telford T50 route. I see that you have correctly created a route relation, however the individual ways should not also be named Telford T50. It is perfectly fine for the individual ways to be unnamed. Out of interest what sources are you using? ...
	2	2023-05-01 11:41	adioan ♦1	Hi I've only named paths that have no name already. T50 is already very well waymarked and I think it just looks good on the map. Regarding my sources, like all the paths I've added in the past 8 months, are mostly my own Strava records. My partner and I are trying to cycle and/or walk ...
	3	2023-05-01 15:46	trigpoint	Thank you for your reply. You say it looks good on the map, however there is no one map. OSM is a geographic database which is consumed and rendered in many different ways. If a way hasn't got a name then we do not make one up (or assign it one of the routes that follows that way. A more ...
	4	2023-05-02 08:46	adioan ♦1	I see what you mean, especially when it comes to paths that share more than one walking routes. Are Silkin and Monarch way also wrong to be named then? https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#17/52.63386/-2.44452
134540648 by Anton Valodzin @ 2023-04-05 14:03	1	2023-04-30 14:15	trigpoint	Hi Not sure what you were trying to achieve here, but you seem to have put a large kink into the exit way. This is incorrect and the transition is smooth. I have reverted this change. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-05-02 05:54	Anton Valodzin ♦18	HI! I'am changed the road geometry in order to provide better guidance for drivers passing through the area.
135421059 by Vera_D @ 2023-04-27 10:24	1	2023-04-28 10:12	trigpoint	Hi I do not recall where this project was discussed with the UK community. I do not recall anything and cannot find anything on the mailing list. In this change you have added turn restrictions. Turn restrictions should only be mapped where there is a legal restriction. In this case there are no...
	2	2023-04-28 12:53	Vera_D ♦18	Hi, trigpoint! Here is the documentation for the project you are writing about - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/missing_roundabouts_UK and - https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/420 There is a footnote on the osm wiki page about turn restrictions - https:...
135329960 by Jorisbo @ 2023-04-25 07:23	1	2023-04-26 12:03	trigpoint	Hi What sources did you use for this edit? It appears to be a purely armchair edit and has undone edits made by the National Trust using on the ground knowledge. Whilst it may not have been perfect, it is clearly a work in progress done with on the ground knowledge. A comment on the chang...
135080136 by JackW25 @ 2023-04-18 23:37	1	2023-04-20 16:07	trigpoint	This edit is also incorrect. These are mini-roundabouts which have been correctly mapped for 14 years. I have reverted this change.
135079920 by JackW25 @ 2023-04-18 23:22	1	2023-04-19 14:46	trigpoint	This edit is incorrect, these are not roundabouts and have been correctly mapped as mini-roundabouts for the past 13 years.
1681536 by Andy Street @ 2009-06-29 20:16	1	2022-07-08 21:50	marc__marc ♦1,265	Hello, diametre 14 meters ? if not, what's the meaning of 14 n ? Regards, Marc
	2	2023-04-12 01:03	marc__marc ♦1,265	14 inches ?
	3	2023-04-12 08:58	trigpoint	It should be tagged as 14" as per OSM wiki for imperial measurements. Cheers Phil
	4	2023-04-25 23:51	marc__marc ♦1,265	fixed
134586779 by simonc11 @ 2023-04-06 17:17	1	2023-04-07 16:18	trigpoint	I am not sure I would have put this back. The pub was looking very derelict in February, so don't expect it to exist much longer. Cheers Phil
134587414 by simonc11 @ 2023-04-06 17:34	1	2023-04-07 16:04	trigpoint	Hi This edit was a little wrong. Maxheight should be on the way to which it applies so that routers see it, it shouldn't be on the way that crosses the bridge. An imperial limit in this case should be 15'0", not 15 ft. I have fixed this, so thank you for reminding me. Che...
132587863 by willisturm @ 2023-02-15 15:34	1	2023-03-19 10:43	SK53 ♦864	Do you actually look at the things you change? The tag in_memory might not be widely used (no doubt there is a more popular one), but this does not refer to a war memorial for which memorial:conflict is intended. If in doubt don't change things. It can make them worse. Jerry
	2	2023-03-24 09:14	willisturm ♦55	I think memorial:conflict= fits better here according to the wiki. Willi
	3	2023-03-24 09:59	trigpoint	Can you explain how a member of the Peak and Northern Footpath Society is in any way a conflict?
	4	2023-03-24 10:14	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	Hello Willi, Andy here - from OSM's Data Working Group (and coincidentally also a Peak and Northern Footpath Society member). Perhaps it would help if you could explain what you thought that you were changing here, and why you changed it - in particular why "memorial:conflict= fits bette...
	5	2023-03-24 10:21	willisturm ♦55	You're right, memorial:conflict= is clearly wrong. Would it be better to use "description=In memory of Stan Fry, Member from 1949-1998" instead of in_memory= ? Willi
	6	2023-03-24 11:36	SK53 ♦864	We were wondering about inscription which is the usual tag on memorials, even if it's not quite an inscription. Adding the info as a description or note is perhaps a bit less useful (and in practice adds nothing and takes away a bit from the original tag, which does clearly show what it is abou...
132585296 by willisturm @ 2023-02-15 14:39	1	2023-03-21 14:00	trigpoint	Hi, this edit looks very wrong. Why did you decide all vehicles over 7.5t are subject to the restriction rather than just goods vehicles over 7.5t. Did you visit the site?
	2	2023-03-24 10:35	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	Hello, In what way was this a "tag mismatch"? The https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight explicitly mentions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweightrating and links to that page. Best Regards, Andy
133717538 by willisturm @ 2023-03-15 16:41	1	2023-03-19 13:32	SK53 ♦864	Once again your "fix" is not a fix, but breaks the mapping.
	2	2023-03-19 13:48	trigpoint	Hi, how exactly did you decide removing the casino tag was correct? Maybe you should have removed the restaurant tag. Or maybe they are both correct? Cheers Phil
	3	2023-03-19 15:20	SK53 ♦864	Reverted.
	4	2023-03-24 09:25	willisturm ♦55	According to the wiki, leisure=casino is wrong. Use amenity=casino instead. Cheers Willi
	5	2023-03-24 11:44	SK53 ♦864	Hi Willi, But you deleted the casino tag not the restaurant one. Given it has Casino in the name that was quite a clue. When mapped I think leisure=casino was quite popular, but someone retagged a lot a few years ago. Jerry
133693513 by mubshh @ 2023-03-15 05:26	1	2023-03-15 20:06	trigpoint	Hi, this edit has gone a bit wrong. Why have you deleted the drive-through? Cheers Phil
	2	2023-03-17 08:40	mubshh ♦3	Hi trigpoint, Thank you for reviewing our changeset and flagging out the issue. It's an honest mistake from our end. I have made the necessary changes in the changeset. Always happy to learn from the community. Thanks once again, looking forward to learn more from you. Regards, mubshh
133584727 by chris_debian @ 2023-03-12 12:36	1	2023-03-13 13:41	trigpoint	Hi, a layby hardly fits the wiki description of a rest areas. Rest areas, as found in France which this tag is intended to represent do not really exist in the UK. Would you really stop here, expect to sit at a table and enjoy lunch while the kids run around? Please revert, this and other simila...
	2	2023-03-13 21:04	chris_debian ♦21	Hi, Phil. Thanks for your message. The wiki says: "A [W] rest area is place along a road, usually a motorway or dual carriageway, where a driver can stop to have a rest. Unlike highway=services, rest areas don't have places to buy fuel, but they may have picnic tables, garbage bin...
	3	2023-03-14 16:19	trigpoint	The wiki provides a reasonable description of a rest area, however extending that to a layby is going a bit far. In a layby you are unlikely to get toilets or picnic tables, although you may get a bin if you are lucky For some reason the UK never did proper rest areas, as you find in France, ...
133017483 by patthoyts @ 2023-02-25 18:28	1	2023-02-26 10:54	DaveF ♦1,566	Hi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149478153#map=19/51.48926/-2.44964 Could you clarify why you slit this small section & not given it a PROW ref?
	2	2023-02-26 11:12	DaveF ♦1,566	Hi Similarly for this short section. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149478154#map=19/51.49156/-2.46166 Please don't join two paths to a barrier/stile etc as routing software will state that the gate has to be passed through to walk from the footway to the track, which, in the real worl...
	3	2023-02-26 21:42	patthoyts ♦5	For the first one - because there is a gap on the South Gloucestershire definitive map data between LPU 48,49 and LPU 47. This can be seen on the overlays at https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/south-gloucs/-/pucklechurch/ or when importing the footpath data as an overlay for JOSM. For the second...
	4	2023-02-26 22:22	DaveF ♦1,566	1. I really think that can be put down to poor representation by the local authorities. I get the impression it's a job given to the junior/intern. I don't think OSM should copy their lack of detail. 2. Thanks.
	5	2023-02-27 18:52	trigpoint	Whilst this is not the correct way to map rights of way in a OSM, we should map what is on the ground (best from a survey) which often differs from the definitive map. Rights of way do legally end when a path enters highway land, it is not poor mapping by the local authority, the definitive map ha...
	6	2023-02-28 12:53	DaveF ♦1,566	"Rights of way do legally end when a path enters highway land," That's interesting. Do you have any details?
	7	2023-03-02 18:46	DaveF ♦1,566	This is the definitive statements for the three paths in the S. Glos's records. https://snipboard.io/nq1P40.jpg
130217968 by CasGroenigen @ 2022-12-18 16:35	1	2022-12-19 08:45	Benoît C MdP ♦180	Bonjour Pour info, au niveau de la place Raoul Dautry (Paris Montparnasse), tu as utilisé une orthophoto obsolète et donc supprimé des données qui étaient à jour dans OSM. Comme ton changeset est énorme, je ne peux pas faire de revert donc je corri...
	2	2022-12-19 08:50	Benoît C MdP ♦180	Et je vois également que tu as relié entre eux des voies qui ne sont pas au même niveau. Par exemple un cheminement piéton de surface et un escalier au 2e sous-sol. Il faut faire attention à ne pas valider automatiquement les propositions des outils de contrôl...
	3	2022-12-19 09:14	CasGroenigen ♦43	Bonjour, The changeset is so large because I made a change to a rail track that is part of the raltion: TER 23 : Le Mans − Nogent le Rotrou − Paris (1900697, v174). This makes the changeset appear over such a large area, I'm sorry about that.
	4	2023-01-25 18:10	trigpoint	https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6609364648 s'est un peu mal passé. La brand devrait sûrement être en Français? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6609364648 has gone a little wrong. Surely the brand should be in French?
	5	2023-01-25 18:20	trigpoint	Aussi https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9664432823
	6	2023-01-25 19:32	CasGroenigen ♦43	It seems to be an issue with what language OSM prioratizes to show here. the name in (en) shows as Société Générale but the arabic name has also been added. And since France is not an English speaking country osm might have wrongly chosen to display the arabic name.
	7	2023-01-25 20:41	trigpoint	It was an error in the name suggestion index. An only Algeria update had gone in as except Algeria.It should now have been fixed. I afterwards realise you were not the only mapper to add these tags.
	8	2023-01-25 20:45	trigpoint	It was odd name:en tags on things native speakers don't translate I was looking for :)
120209907 by borovac @ 2022-04-26 12:09	1	2023-01-23 13:57	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	Hello borovac, Just to be clear, we can't use wikipedia as a source for OpenStreetMap, because the licence is not compatible, Of course, whatever source was used to update wikipedia may have a compatible licence - but you'll need to track down the sources that were used. Certainly, the ...
	2	2023-01-24 07:36	borovac ♦103	Thank you for drawing me attention to the improper use of wikipedia. I fixed name:en in loc_name All best Milan Borovac (borovac)
	3	2023-01-25 13:37	trigpoint	Hi Milan I originally spotted the odd looking Welsh name whilst route planning with OSMand set to Welsh. The Welsh name is also a description rather than the name. You seem to have simply copied the titles from Wikipedia for Welsh and other languages. In Wikipedia the title obviously needs somet...
	4	2023-01-25 14:59	borovac ♦103	Hi Phil, Thanks for reaching out, I’ve removed it, to avoid any future confusion. Thanks for pointing out this irregularity on Wikipedia and mine on OSM. All the best, Borovac
	5	2023-01-31 14:16	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6823 .
	6	2023-01-31 15:19	borovac ♦103	Hi SomeoneElse, I have removed data added by using Wikipedia. Can you please double check if everything is ok so I can avoid being block again?
	7	2023-02-02 13:36	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	Yes - thanks.
	8	2023-02-11 03:12	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	I've just had a quick look, and a little over 6000 of your other changesets also use wikipedia as a source. Is that something that you can undo yourself, or would you like some help doing that?
	9	2023-02-11 09:25	borovac ♦103	Hi, Can you please give me a few days to extract all the changesets so that I can do a revert of all them, and avoid making some mistakes in process. When I finish reverting my changesets and made them all the correction, I will let you know so that we can further coordinate if there is anything e...
131503279 by ChillyDL @ 2023-01-20 10:57	1	2023-01-20 12:55	trigpoint	Please split your edits into sensible areas, at a maximum a country at a time.
	2	2023-01-21 09:10	woodpeck_repair ♦33,903	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131516442, 131526374, 131530757, 131528834, 131521894, 131510103 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy mass edit
124816262 by alisonlung @ 2022-08-12 12:17 Active block	1	2022-09-02 17:03	trigpoint	What does #waymap-project-SB mean?
	2	2023-01-17 08:27	rskedgell ♦1,478	@trigpoint Did you ever get an answer?
	3	2023-01-17 11:18	trigpoint	@rskedgell I never got a response
	4	2023-01-19 08:08	rskedgell ♦1,478	According to the local authority, the part of Norland Road (w606519484) changed from cycleway->footway is "a pedestrian and cycle zone". The Kensington and Chelsea (Prescribed Routes) (No. 2) Traffic Order 2022 https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4027262 --- ...
131264245 by LukeAW @ 2023-01-14 13:05	1	2023-01-14 13:51	trigpoint	The passenger train are operated by TFW, but are the tracks? I would not expect the signallers to be employed by network rail. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-01-14 13:59	LukeAW ♦2	Yes it's a bit confusing but the trains are operated by transport for Wales rail, this is a subsidiary of transport for Wales the Welsh government transport org who own the core valley lines from just west of Cardiff Queen Street all the way up. (And also to a bit West of ninian park).
131191506 by JackW25 @ 2023-01-12 14:34	1	2023-01-12 21:28	trigpoint	The other roads you have added are also Newcomen Way according to OS Opendata Roads which is a usable source.
51199357 by uebelhacker @ 2017-08-17 09:40	1	2023-01-08 23:51	trigpoint	Bore Da What sources did you use to determine the location or existence of this memorial? Did you survey it. Seems odd to be missing from both wikidata and geograph. Diolch Phil
	2	2023-01-10 13:36	uebelhacker ♦3	Hi Diolch Phil, I was surveying and copied the inscriptions. Best, Sven.
119612077 by SammyTheSnake @ 2022-04-12 09:17	1	2022-04-12 14:00	trigpoint	Hi, I am not sure when you surveyed these roads, but there is no shoulder along this stretch of the A5. Cheers Phil
	2	2023-01-03 18:23	trigpoint	No response so setting shoulder to no
124039520 by Woftis @ 2022-07-25 08:27	1	2023-01-03 16:40	trigpoint	Mapper has not replied to similar edit and there is no mapillary evidence of such restrictions. Tags removed.
124039569 by Woftis @ 2022-07-25 08:28	1	2023-01-03 16:40	trigpoint	Mapper has not replied to similar edit and there is no mapillary evidence of such restrictions. Tags removed.
124039618 by Woftis @ 2022-07-25 08:29	1	2023-01-03 16:40	trigpoint	Mapper has not replied to similar edit and there is no mapillary evidence of such restrictions. Tags removed.
124040656 by Woftis @ 2022-07-25 08:51	1	2022-08-20 15:55	trigpoint	Hi, I am baffled as to why you have added use_sidepath here? On mapillary I cannot see any signs prohibiting pedestrians or cyclists on this road so wondering what your sources are? Cheers Phil
	2	2023-01-03 15:48	ntzm ♦39	This should probably be reverted
	3	2023-01-03 16:39	trigpoint	Mapper has not replied and there is no mapillary evidence of such restrictions. Tags removed.
130376345 by onkelben866 @ 2022-12-22 13:30	1	2022-12-22 19:07	traveleditor ♦104	Hey there, it's great that you're helping people around the world by making changes to the map! To make it easier for validators, it's best to keep your changesets small and start a new one if you're mapping in a different place or country. Have a great day!
	2	2022-12-26 16:57	trigpoint	Hi, this appears to be a mechanical edit that has blindly taken the warning from a QA tool, and without sanity checking each object. For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319130496 which is a building named McDonalds, you have added standard tags duplicating those already on https://www.ope...
	3	2022-12-27 11:48	onkelben866 ♦16	Richtig es ist alles mechanisch editiert worden. Hauptsache man kann meckern. Meine Güte wenn es dir nicht passt mach es Rückgängig.
	4	2022-12-27 11:49	onkelben866 ♦16	Ich beschäftige mich mit Russland nicht, daher. Habe es entsprechend geändert.
	5	2022-12-27 17:53	ivanbranco ♦2,700	@trigpoint: seems like brand-related mechanical edits are allowed by now. Recently there has been also updates like this in Europe and none of those edits was reverted. It would be cool to make it clear tho, and/or making it clear in the Wiki as well.
	6	2022-12-27 20:58	onkelben866 ♦16	Es wurde nichts mechanisch gemacht meine Güte, nur weil ihr sowas nicht macht............
122375006 by Nadia Bunevich @ 2022-06-14 14:22	1	2022-12-22 13:57	trigpoint	Hi, in this edit you have added a name:en of "Arch of Triumph". No English speaking person translates this name, in English it is simply known as "Arc de Triomphe", same as in French. Why do you feel this edit is required? It is more likely to confuse someone with their mapping ...
	2	2022-12-22 14:22	Nadia Bunevich ♦3	Hello) Thank you for your attention. I fixed the tag name:en, changeset: 130378698
	3	2022-12-22 17:11	trigpoint	Thank you
112202889 by Chros32 @ 2021-10-07 08:03	1	2022-12-20 12:59	trigpoint	Again what is the source of this edit? Surely to determine where bikes are allowed you would need to either survey the signs or use mapillary or streetside? For example if bikes were prohibited on https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=59568a4b-9ba1-46b6-a696-9edf6113d567&cp=53.226286~-4.26019&lvl=...
112186905 by Chros32 @ 2021-10-06 20:51	1	2022-12-20 12:33	trigpoint	Why? Bikes are only prohibited through Colwyn Bay and the tunnels. Cheers Phil
128499481 by JackW25 @ 2022-11-04 20:20	1	2022-12-12 15:20	trigpoint	Adding notor vehicle=designated has made the bus only way routable for cars. The access tags had been fine for the last 13 years.
	2	2022-12-12 15:24	JackW25 ♦5	This way is designated for busses, taxis and bicycles. So not just for busses.
	3	2022-12-12 16:46	trigpoint	True, it is tagged with bicycle=yes and psv=yes, so was correct. Taxis and buses are both covered by psv.
129978908 by Eliiia @ 2022-12-11 23:06	1	2022-12-12 08:15	trigpoint	Hi Just wondering why you have removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41603394 ? The road is certainly divided at that point and this allows only buses to travel along here from North to South.
	2	2022-12-12 08:21	Eliiia ♦4	I will take a look at that, but if this is the road I am thinking of (next to Telford college) the way I deleted was from the road being divided for a few meters because of a pedestrian island, which I thought I added using a highway=crossing Splitting the road for a few meters certainly did not ...
	3	2022-12-12 08:46	trigpoint	It is longer than a pedestrian island, and is probably one of the earliest modal filters in OSM having existed for 13 years. This deletion should be reverted to preserve history. It can be adjusted to look better if necessary but has always been correct.
	4	2022-12-12 08:49	Eliiia ♦4	Alright, fair enough. How would I revert it?
	5	2022-12-12 08:52	trigpoint	JackW's addition of motor_vehicle=designated is certainly wrong and should be removed.
	6	2022-12-12 09:42	trigpoint	With josm, select the existing way and then revert selection and restore deleted objects. I can do it if you want or give it a go yourself.
	7	2022-12-12 15:06	Eliiia ♦4	Ill give it a go when I'm back home
	8	2022-12-12 15:11	trigpoint	I have fixed it. I also removed the motor vehicle=designated which was added by JackW as that had made it routeable for cars.
113808789 by ohmanger @ 2021-11-15 14:44	1	2022-12-12 13:51	trigpoint	Is there really a legal (signed) turn restriction here?
	2	2022-12-12 14:37	ohmanger ♦39	Hey Phil! No signed turn restriction but I'm pretty sure I put this here because there are physical "keep left" barrier islands (visible on bing maps) making it impractical/impossible to make a right turn from the slip roads without mounting the kerb. I have added implicit=yes tags...
123904309 by DaveF @ 2022-07-21 17:58	1	2022-12-12 08:55	trigpoint	Wellington Platform 3 is not disused in that it has tracks and a working departure board, not sure what services use it though.
	2	2023-02-19 13:52	DaveF ♦1,566	Thanks
129859787 by JackW25 @ 2022-12-08 12:41	1	2022-12-09 21:24	trigpoint	This edit is very wrong, there is no physical separation, therefore there should only be one way. As you have mapped this traffic would be unable to access the petrol station without going onto the A5223 roundabout, which is incorrect.
129569701 by ohmanger @ 2022-11-30 17:10	1	2022-12-01 12:37	trigpoint	Hi The website link doesn't work, are you sure it exists as all I can find is a facebook page. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-12-01 15:02	ohmanger ♦39	Good spot. https://www.bubbleoncup.com/ works although it currently just redirects to their facebook page.
129324035 by Hannah Povey @ 2022-11-24 12:44	1	2022-11-28 12:56	trigpoint	Hi Hannah Welcome to OSM and thank you for your edit. One small problem, in order for a path to be used it needs to be connected to other ways. For some reason you have stopped short of the roads at either end. If you need any help please feel to ask. Cheers Phil
129337979 by Bolt010 @ 2022-11-24 17:33	1	2022-11-25 16:16	trigpoint	Again there is no legal turn restriction here.
	2	2022-12-01 07:24	Bolt010 ♦6	Hello Trigpoint, Thank you for bringing this to our attention. As per your suggestion, reverted the edits accordingly.
129250678 by Bolt010 @ 2022-11-22 18:22	1	2022-11-25 16:12	trigpoint	This junction was correctly mapped before, what are you trying to achieve? There are no separated ways crossing the junction as you have mapped it. This edit needs to be reverted. Cheers Phil
129291675 by Bolt010 @ 2022-11-23 17:39	1	2022-11-25 12:36	trigpoint	I have reverted this edit. There is no physical separation so mapping two ways is wrong and your change has broken pedestrian routing. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-12-01 07:30	Bolt010 ♦6	Hello Trigpoint, Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We will be vigilant going forward.
129294134 by Bolt010 @ 2022-11-23 18:56	1	2022-11-25 12:20	trigpoint	Again why? There is no turn restriction here. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-12-01 07:47	Bolt010 ♦6	Hello Trigpoint, Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I will analyze your suggestion and proceed with edits accordingly.
129292353 by Bolt010 @ 2022-11-23 18:00	1	2022-11-25 12:00	trigpoint	Whilst not 'normal', there is no legal restriction on U turns here. Turn restrictions should reflect only legal restrictions. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-12-01 07:50	Bolt010 ♦6	Hello Trigpoint, Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I will analyze your suggestion and proceed with edits accordingly.
129338302 by Bolt010 @ 2022-11-24 17:44	1	2022-11-25 11:58	trigpoint	Why? It was correct previously. The physical separation does not cross Glenfield Road and there are not two sets of lights. This edit should be reverted. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-11-29 13:25	Bolt033 ♦8	Hi Phil, I am Alexandra and I would like to thank you for bringing this case into our attention. Bolt010 indeed made a mistake by not connecting node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10210327734 with the primary way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168942913. Before proceeding in editing the ...
121380534 by petelancaster @ 2022-05-23 16:57	1	2022-11-24 10:40	trigpoint	Hi, this edit is a little odd. Wondering why you have changed the Wikipedia language to ab? Cheers Phil
	2	2022-11-24 13:14	petelancaster ♦2	That wasn't intentional. I have now changed the Wikipedia language to "en". Pete
	3	2022-11-24 13:19	trigpoint	Diolch
129249746 by fernwee @ 2022-11-22 17:49	1	2022-11-23 16:08	trigpoint	Hi If an object is closed it should not be tagged with the amenity tag as this will lead map users to it despite it being closed. Using tagging such as disused:amenity=toilet is the preferred method. Names should be actual names and should not be used for descriptions or for information such as clo...
	2	2022-11-24 05:54	fernwee ♦2	Thanks for checking, Phil. I fixed it per your suggestion
125121953 by user_5589 @ 2022-08-19 18:52	1	2022-11-18 10:48	yasslay ♦93	Hello! Why did you make this part of the Fosse Way one way? This isn't reflected on satellite imagery, please explain why you changed it to be like this. Kind regards, yasslay
	2	2022-11-18 18:05	trigpoint	Its not reflected in my memory or mapillary either https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=281711566996173
	3	2022-11-18 18:27	user_5589 ♦51	Definitely not intentional! Corrected as of about 60 seconds ago.
121828231 by Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle @ 2022-06-01 21:14	1	2022-11-11 22:19	Nathan_A_RF ♦219	Do motorways need maxheight tags? It's implied that the maxheight of bridges on them is default unless stated
	2	2022-11-14 16:38	Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle ♦6	Sadly, some motorways require that tall vehicles are in the centre-most lane under certain bridges - I assume the screetcomplete people have a reason for having included this quest. I guess it's the usual default-assumption vs actually-checked-on-site argument.
	3	2022-11-14 18:18	trigpoint	Can you cite any in the UK, or mainland Europe? I cannot recall ever seeing such a thing having driven on motorways in many European countries. IMHO it is certainly a quest that should not be enabled in the UK
	4	2022-11-14 18:57	Nathan_A_RF ♦219	All motorway bridges should be a default height, only ones that have a low height I can recall are in Leeds. The Max Height Map does not include motorways as roads missing maxheight tags. Nonetheless, you do not add max height tags to the entire road - only tag the way directly under the bridge (see...
	5	2022-11-17 17:09	Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle ♦6	I have seen some of these bridges in the UK, but can't remember where. Perhaps this should be taken up with the StreetComplete team.
	6	2022-11-18 18:21	Nathan_A_RF ♦219	My point above still stands so please only tag the way directly below the bridge when you add maxheight tags
	7	2022-11-18 19:50	Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle ♦6	Fair enough, would you like to notify the StreetComplete people to make this change, or shall I? Using the app, I can split the way under the bridge and only.answer there, but that still leaves a messy UI and potentially unwanted extra metadata in the OSM database. Where's the relevant wi...
	8	2022-11-18 22:24	Nathan_A_RF ♦219	I am not familiar with the StreetComplete people so please go ahead. The relevant wiki page is here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight
	9	2022-11-19 09:22	Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle ♦6	Thanks, I shall do that, and in the meantime I have disabled this question in StreetComplete.
125948167 by davidbavin-hobbs @ 2022-09-08 15:27	1	2022-11-08 22:16	trigpoint	If it is marked for cyclists to dismount then it is clearly not fine
	2	2023-11-27 20:53	jpennycook ♦327	The sign on the bridge was stronger than merely "dismount" - my vague memory from the Summer is that it was more like End of Cycle Route (as it was when I originally tagged the path in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29010385 ), so I've put it back to bicycle=dismount See als...
127049811 by davidbavin-hobbs @ 2022-10-05 14:11	1	2022-11-08 21:46	trigpoint	What is the source of this edit. Loose gritty gravel is certainly what I have observed here. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-11-10 11:42	davidbavin-hobbs ♦2	I thought 'gravel' was too strong a word for what the surface is, it seemed very close to paved for me. Would compacted be a better description. Agree it's not asphalt.
124808422 by Ahrtaler @ 2022-08-12 09:02	1	2022-08-20 14:59	trigpoint	Hi Wondering why you have changed some footways to paths? Path is a problematic tag in England/Wales due to access rules. Footway implies foot only, which along with designation=public_footpath is correct. The problem with path it needs a load of access tags to be meaningful. Many applications w...
	2	2022-10-30 16:45	trigpoint	Mapper has not responded so reverting these edits.
127317261 by cahartig @ 2022-10-10 17:58	1	2022-10-11 11:47	trigpoint	Hi This edits has gone a bit wrong. Thieves' Lane is not the A5064 or the way to Shrewsbury;Crematorium;London Road Sports Centre;College of Arts and Technology You have it on the wrong road. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-10-11 13:14	cahartig ♦2	Hi Phil, Thanks so much for pointing this out! I have moved the sign over to the correct road A5064, so it should be all set now. Thanks, Caitlin
126132783 by Sam888 @ 2022-09-13 12:46	1	2022-09-15 14:03	trigpoint	Hi Sam I tried to contact you over a week ago asking what your motivation is for changing a large number of unclassified roads to tertiary but you have not responded and have continued making these damaging edits. As a mapper I consider this very disrespectful. This road over the Beacons has bee...
125866612 by Sam888 @ 2022-09-06 16:36	1	2022-09-06 16:50	trigpoint	This seems an odd change, unclassified is probably the correct tag as this road is quite narrow. Wondering why you changed it as it has been unclassified since it was first mapped 11 years ago. Cheers Phil
124896240 by Jorisbo @ 2022-08-14 17:09	1	2022-08-16 18:24	trigpoint	Operator:type=private seems an odd way to describe The National Trust is it not. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-17 07:06	Jorisbo ♦144	Hi Phil! Thank you for your comment. It seems odd indeed. I don't remember changing this. Not a kind of tag I would ever use in purpose. But I do fix access typo's a lot (access=, bicycle=, foot=) So if I did this, it's worth changing again :-). Kind regards, Joris
	3	2022-09-04 12:12	trigpoint	I have finally got around to updating the operator:type to charitable. Cheers Phil
125560125 by ohmanger @ 2022-08-30 09:51	1	2022-08-30 12:40	trigpoint	Shouldn't Fish Street be oneway again now it has reopened? Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-30 13:34	ohmanger ♦39	Yes I missed that, thanks Phil.
124996387 by Jorisbo @ 2022-08-17 02:47	1	2022-08-20 17:10	trigpoint	Why have you removed motorcycle=clothing? In doing so you have thrown away surveyed information that said this is a shop that sells motorcycle clothing and turned it into a shop that sells motorcycles. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-29 09:45	trigpoint	No response so reverting
	3	2022-08-29 17:05	Jorisbo ♦144	Hi Phil, back from vacaction. The tag motorcycle is used for access-tagging to describe wheter or not motorcycles are allowed at a certain highway. Not surprised there is only one usage of motorcycle=clothes in the osm world I suggest to change it to clothes=motorcycle kind regards Joris
117387498 by Jorisbo @ 2022-02-14 10:45	1	2022-08-20 16:06	trigpoint	Hi. use_sidepath is a very unusual tag to find on a road in the UK. I cannot see any signs indicating this restriction on mapillary. What sources are you using? Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-29 09:40	trigpoint	No response so reverting
125144364 by Ahrtaler @ 2022-08-20 11:53	1	2022-08-20 14:46	trigpoint	Hi SJ 269413 is not a ref. It is an OS grid reference which is just a location which can also be derived from the OSM location, Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-29 09:35	trigpoint	No response so I have removed the grid reference from the reference tag.
125146177 by Ahrtaler @ 2022-08-20 12:47	1	2022-08-20 14:15	trigpoint	Hi Whilst these may not be the most sensible manoeuvres, they are not actually illegal. There are no signs prohibiting U turns here. What sources have you used? Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-22 17:36	trigpoint	Hallo Dies sind zwar nicht die vernünftigsten Manöver, aber sie sind nicht wirklich illegal. Es gibt hier keine Schilder, die U-turns verbieten. Welche Quellen haben Sie verwendet?
	3	2022-08-29 09:22	trigpoint	No response so reverting
121972679 by blacklinkin @ 2022-06-05 11:32	1	2022-08-28 22:26	trigpoint	Is there really drinking water here, seems a bit far from civilisation to find safe clean drinking water.
	2	2022-08-29 17:47	blacklinkin ♦5	yes , there is a water tap in the park
54510254 by PalmerJ @ 2017-12-10 13:05	1	2022-08-24 16:32	trigpoint	Hi, just wondering why you changed the name of this hamlet?
125272601 by garageman03 @ 2022-08-23 13:31	1	2022-08-23 14:15	trigpoint	Since when have there been signs prohibiting pedestrians? Foot=no is for legal restrictions. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-23 15:52	garageman03 ♦3	Whoops sorry I was broken down on the A5 and slightly mindlessly doing tasks on the streetcomplete app!
	3	2022-08-23 16:06	trigpoint	Thank you. Hope you got recovered quite quickly. I will revert this one. Cheers Phil
125118344 by Evan_Cho @ 2022-08-19 17:17	1	2022-08-20 15:22	trigpoint	Hi, just wondering what sources you have use for this turn-restriction? There are no signs visible om mapillary so I I wondering how you have concluded that there is a restriction here? Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-20 15:33	trigpoint	Sorry, found it further back. There would normally be a sign at the junction. Cheers Phil
	3	2022-09-01 21:58	Evan_Cho ♦2	Hi Phil, Sorry for the delay in the response. Thank you for looking into this edit. It seems you found the No U Turn sign that I found in Mapillary. In case there is any confusion here is the Mapillary image where I found the No U Turn sign. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.96244839789&lng=...
125028321 by Keith W Robertson @ 2022-08-17 17:28	1	2022-08-17 17:30	trigpoint	Hi Tagging marker=yes doesn't make a lot of sense. What is the marker? Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-17 17:51	Keith W Robertson ♦4	Hi Phil, Wow, it was only there for about 2 minutes!! Just a temporary marker (actually a stile) to help with drawing / updating a path to the crags. All edited now :-) Path was a nightmare, hard to follow today with all the very high bracken!! Handy to come across an actual stile, so at leas...
	3	2022-08-17 18:28	trigpoint	Sorry I was a bit quick, and glad you had a 'fun' walk. Cheers Phil
	4	2022-08-17 18:53	Keith W Robertson ♦4	Shorts not a good idea .... shins very scratched and bleeding onto my socks!
124781543 by roland_sw @ 2022-08-11 15:32	1	2022-08-11 17:04	trigpoint	Should there not be a weight limit? Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-11 23:26	roland_sw ♦3	I can add that to this section given the news report, but I'm not local so I don't know if it just applies to this bit or the whole road - that needs someone to survey.
124649529 by trigpoint @ 2022-08-08 16:58	1	2022-08-08 17:21	R66_Mapper ♦56	Conflicting edits moment.
	2	2022-08-08 17:26	R66_Mapper ♦56	Btw do you know when carpetright will be replaced? --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124649529
	3	2022-08-08 17:59	trigpoint	I don't, sorry
	4	2022-08-08 22:07	R66_Mapper ♦56	ok ty
124575515 by Cholst @ 2022-08-06 19:29	1	2022-08-07 18:09	trigpoint	Hi, the campsite is already mapped. I have removed the duplication. Cheers Phil
124575643 by Cholst @ 2022-08-06 19:33	1	2022-08-07 18:06	trigpoint	Hi, the campsite is already mapped. I have removed the duplication. Cheers Phil
124604720 by Cholst @ 2022-08-07 16:34	1	2022-08-07 18:06	trigpoint	Hi, the pub is already mapped. I have removed the duplication. Cheers Phil
124604760 by Cholst @ 2022-08-07 16:35	1	2022-08-07 18:05	trigpoint	Hi, the cafe is already mapped. I have removed the duplication. Cheers Phil
124549040 by Jorisbo @ 2022-08-06 07:19	1	2022-08-06 15:48	trigpoint	Hi, when changing access tags in Cymru/England please be careful not to break existing routing. For example by adding access=private to way 229617291 you have broken foot access to the right of way which is obvious to someone familiar with access rules in Cymru/England as a footway connects furth...
	2	2022-08-06 16:08	Jorisbo ♦144	Hi Phil, thank you for the reply. I missed the connecting footpath. i Just fixed it. Kind regards Joris
	3	2022-08-06 16:19	trigpoint	Hi Joris Thank you/diolch. Phil
124410961 by Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle @ 2022-08-02 21:53	1	2022-08-04 20:33	trigpoint	Since when have pedestrians been prohibited from the A500. I travelled along it last weekend and no new signs had appeared.
	2	2022-08-04 20:59	Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle ♦6	At the time I made these, I wasn't aware this was meant to be about legality rather than safety - feel free to revert the changeset if you like.
	3	2022-08-05 13:13	trigpoint	I have removed foot=no from these roads. Cheers Phil
	4	2022-08-05 13:26	Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle ♦6	Okay, my apologies for the noise.
124362673 by Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle @ 2022-08-01 19:55	1	2022-08-04 18:53	trigpoint	Thank you for you edits however please keep your edits to single geographical areas. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-04 19:01	Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle ♦6	Apologies, this is just how StreetCompletw uploads the edits. Maybe I should suggest they group them by county?
	3	2022-08-04 20:18	trigpoint	Thank you, I realise that is the way it works but isn't the idea of phone apps to map objects you are standing in front of rather than to map places you have visited in the past?
	4	2022-08-04 20:58	Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle ♦6	I did all of these while I was a passenger in a car - they were all observations at the time.
124467033 by karoAK @ 2022-08-04 07:53	1	2022-08-04 10:50	trigpoint	Why have you changed this? The local who mapped it was correct, it is a driveway to a house. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-05 12:44	karoAK ♦1	My apologies, I made a mistake. I have reverted the changes and will review the resources so that I don’t make the same mistake again.
124468716 by Swihail @ 2022-08-04 08:37	1	2022-08-04 10:46	trigpoint	Why? This is clearly a track used by tractors to travel between fields. You have also not responded to previous comments made on your changesets. Please stop making these damaging edits and engage with the local community. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-05 12:52	Swihail ♦31	My apologies, I made a mistake. I have reverted the changes and will review the resources so that I don’t make the same mistake again.
124469341 by Meh_aR @ 2022-08-04 08:54	1	2022-08-04 10:44	trigpoint	Why? This is clearly a track used by tractors to travel between fields. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-06 06:44	Meh_aR ♦3	My apologies, I made a mistake. I have reverted the changes and will review the resources so that I don’t make the same mistake again.
124434818 by Dora_game @ 2022-08-03 12:28	1	2022-08-03 12:34	trigpoint	Why have you changed this? It is clearly made by two track vehicles and it for tractors to travel between fields. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-05 12:42	Dora_game ♦1	Thank you for the edit; I am reviewing the resources and will not make the same mistake again.
124415383 by Swihail @ 2022-08-03 03:32	1	2022-08-03 11:54	trigpoint	Why? This is clearly a track used by tractors to travel between fields. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-05 12:47	Swihail ♦31	Here again, I’ve made a mistake. I’m sorry for the inconvenience.
124366250 by eastender @ 2022-08-01 22:06	1	2022-08-02 10:36	trigpoint	Hi, just wondering what is the source of these postcodes? Cheers Phil
	2	2022-08-02 11:18	eastender ♦35	The source is code-point open. In this case, there were some partial postcodes already in place for SY4 5UP. I am working on trying to clear all of the partial postcodes in the UK. Here I added the missing elements for SY4 5UP and also added postcode SY4 5TW for completeness of Somerset Way. See htt...
	3	2022-08-02 12:11	trigpoint	Thank you. When I have tried using just the points of code-point open I have foung it impossible to determine where one ends and another begins. Cheers Phil
124145955 by ohmanger @ 2022-07-27 15:06	1	2022-07-27 15:21	trigpoint	I would probably go with access=yes for the gates. Pedestrians can certainly go that way, especially those with dogs but in reality anyone can open the gate and avoid the cattle grid. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-07-27 15:49	ohmanger ♦39	Good point, I'll update them.
124012512 by Graham JB @ 2022-07-24 14:41	1	2022-07-25 18:00	trigpoint	Do these pubs not take cash? Cheers Phil
123857557 by trigpoint @ 2022-07-20 15:48	1	2022-07-20 17:54	LordGarySugar ♦70	FYI you have added junction=roundabout to hundreds of buildings, shops, footways and relations!
	2	2022-07-20 19:16	trigpoint	Thank you, don't know how I loaded that. Was supposed to be one roundabout. Reverted
121785972 by MacLondon @ 2022-05-31 21:38	1	2022-07-20 14:05	trigpoint	Why did you change this?, it is very definitely a roundabout. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-07-20 21:46	MacLondon ♦215	Hi. There is a give_way at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2730892177. Therefore it is not a junction=roundabout
123717864 by VulpesInculta @ 2022-07-17 11:35	1	2022-07-18 13:07	trigpoint	Hi Thank you for your edit however I am not sure that deleting this area was the correct solution. Looking back through the history it was mapped as landuse=retail and was incorrectly changed to pedestrian a few weeks ago. Landuse retail should have been restored Cheers Phil
123472728 by trigpoint @ 2022-07-11 12:12	1	2022-07-17 12:00	R66_Mapper ♦56	reviewed bad using osmcha --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123472728
	2	2022-07-17 16:28	trigpoint	And the problem with this edit is?
123421872 by CjMalone @ 2022-07-10 07:21	1	2022-07-10 09:35	trigpoint	This edit is not very helpful, the information is very misleading and gives a false impression of opening hours. The opening hours of my local post office were surveyed and not armchaired from a misleading website. I can assure you the post office is not open at 20:00 or on a Sunday. The co-op ha...
	2	2022-07-10 10:34	CjMalone ♦233	Cheers Phil, But I reject you labelling this a "mechanical edit". I looked at every POI in this changeset. I reject you calling this edit unhelpful. I think it has undeniably improved post offices in this area, even if there were one or 2 mistakes. Mistakes happen when humans are inv...
	3	2022-07-10 11:11	trigpoint	My local post office https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2636954315/history had the correct opening hours and is mapped as a separate node so as you you say should have the opening hours of the counter but now has a strange version of the supermarket opening hours. Its open until 22:00. This seems t...
	4	2022-07-10 12:02	trigpoint	I suspect most of my (no comment) changeset descriptions come from before OSM supported them.
	5	2022-07-10 12:13	CjMalone ♦233	I was talking about this one, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105877402. There are plenty more bad changset descriptions: #117490994, #113128712, #113128735, #113129191, #111990185, #111990163, #https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112839818. But it's so not important, I don'...
123350353 by bobbob101 @ 2022-07-08 08:36	1	2022-07-08 11:08	trigpoint	Hi, this changeset seems a little odd. Why have you added layer=1 to Tesco, it is very much on the ground.
123274438 by Ageing Rocker @ 2022-07-06 11:50	1	2022-07-06 16:10	trigpoint	Hi, thank you for your edit however the cafe is already mapped and I have removed your duplication. Maps.me is no longer supported, I believe it has been replaced by organic maps.
119684563 by R66_Mapper @ 2022-04-13 20:18	1	2022-04-14 11:03	benoitdd ♦74	all data of the school are lost: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400644469/history please, revert your changes
	2	2022-07-03 13:23	trigpoint	I have reverted this change
123128256 by R66_Mapper @ 2022-07-02 17:44	1	2022-07-03 11:12	trigpoint	When a new mapper appears from nowhere and starts to change tagging which local experienced mappers have agreed on for over a decade makes me think here we go again. In the UK the community has agreed city will only be used for places that are actually cities. The population for Telford is also for...
	2	2022-07-13 18:40	R66_Mapper ♦56	I live in Telford my guy. Plus, my friends at school (I'm 13 btw) agree Telford is a city, even some of my teachers, next time I'll put local knowledge, just because you think it's a town, that's fine, alot of sources say that's a city has more than 100k pop, in fact some s...
	3	2022-07-14 11:26	Enock4seth ♦548	Hi R66_Mapper, Welcoem to OpenStreetMap. Savelugu I am not when it became a city with 100k+ people. Kindly avoid changing town to city in Ghana. Also, keep changeset in a sizeable area.
119880046 by karlchick @ 2022-04-18 22:12	1	2022-06-27 16:23	nickjohnston ♦45	Hi, I'm a bit confused about why you've tagged several sections of road as service roads. Can you please explain why you've tagged Winchcombe Street, part of the High Street, Rodney Road, and Regent Street as service roads? I'm happy to provide to help if necessary. Than...
	2	2022-06-27 20:35	karlchick ♦4	Hi Nick, I think your setting of residential is probably better than service. Thanks for highlighting this, I will keep this in mind in future. Karl.
	3	2022-06-28 17:22	nickjohnston ♦45	Hi Karl, Thanks for your reply. I'm curious: what motivated you to change these roads/streets in the first place? These streets in the town centre have been largely untouched for 13 years or so. When changing data in OpenStreetMap, especially as a relatively new mapper, it's worth...
	4	2022-06-28 19:16	karlchick ♦4	Hi Nick, mostly I really don't like unclassified roads used for roads in built up areas that are not clear through ways, but more like residential/service roads. I am used to using OS maps for many decades, but newish to OSM... it seems odd that OSM don't have a class of highway lower th...
	5	2022-06-30 15:16	trigpoint	> it seems odd that OSM don't have a > class of highway lower than > unclassified, (which on OS maps are > usually 60mph single lane roads > without A or B route numbers), Your comments seem to be missing tertiary, which is how most two lane roads with a 60mph limit ar...
	6	2022-07-07 15:44	nickjohnston ♦45	Hi Karl, Thanks for the explanation. Ordnance Survey and OpenStreetMap naturally have their own different conventions and styles. With OpenStreetMap being a global project, it tries to adopt schemes that work globally (sometimes with a few local changes). For the sake of consistency as well as...
122596006 by karlchick @ 2022-06-19 22:53	1	2022-06-25 21:40	trigpoint	Bore da Why hav you changed the highway type of the Shell Island causeway to a track. It is hardly for agricultural use
	2	2022-06-26 13:14	trigpoint	Shell Island is hardly an insignificant destination
	3	2022-06-26 18:07	karlchick ♦4	Hi trigpoint, I think I made a mistake, you're right the road is the only public access road to the island and should be unclassified. I'll change it back, sorry, and thanks for highlighting this to me.
	4	2022-06-26 18:35	trigpoint	Thank you
120521090 by BodhidharmaI @ 2022-05-04 02:16	1	2022-05-04 08:41	trigpoint	Please keep your changes to sensible areas. This changeset covers a large area, several countries and should be broken into several smaller changes.
	2	2022-05-04 11:07	BodhidharmaI ♦19	And why? Just because the bounding box _visually_ covers large area, doesn’t mean the changeset itself is large. I see no reason to artificially break anything down further. The changes are consistent between themselves within a changeset - which I think is more important
	3	2022-05-04 11:28	RaccoonFederation ♦96	Because it makes life harder for everyone else. It's hard to monitor changes in a local area when the history is spammed by people making global changes, most of which are unnecessary anyway.
	4	2022-05-04 23:26	BodhidharmaI ♦19	By the same token, monitoring changes in a local area most of the time is unnecessary anyway
	5	2022-05-04 23:29	BodhidharmaI ♦19	But if you still do it by using only crude tools for that, don’t try to blame your overload on other editors ;) By the way, here’s another tool for you - maybe it will help reduce your workload: https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120521090&relations=true Cheers
118426681 by RattusMaximus @ 2022-03-13 11:53	1	2022-05-03 08:16	trigpoint	Hi This edit has gone rather wrong, Gullet Lane leads to a bridleway so access cannot be private can it? When tagging access on rights of way please ensure you do not break other usecases, this could well be motor_vehicle=private, but it is a right of way for foot/bikes and horses. Cheers Phi...
	2	2022-05-03 13:42	RattusMaximus ♦1	Fair comment. I have spotted footpaths at the end of gated sections in the past and since but apparently missed this one.
118874300 by Falsernet @ 2022-03-24 17:26	1	2022-04-29 07:22	trigpoint	What is the source of this ridiculous name, nobody calls it Whetstone as it is not in Whetstone. It has no verifiable name but is generally known as Leicester South of just Junction 21.
	2	2022-04-29 20:16	Falsernet ♦151	https://www.roads.org.uk/motorway/m69/10 and https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=Whetstone_Interchange A lot of junctions have arguably silly names, the Avonmouth Interchange comes to mind which is notable for not being connected to anything, as well as not being in Avonmouth. I t...
	3	2022-04-29 21:08	trigpoint	Thank you however those sites are hardly authoritative and the names appear to have been made up with no on the ground knowledge. Hardly suitable for OSM which is supposed to reflect the real world. A junction name should as a minimum appear on a sign. Cheers Phil
	4	2022-12-10 19:43	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=Whetstone_Interchange isn't really anything that we can use, is it? Without any source information (e.g. to a photograph of a sign) it's just a page on the Internet that someone made up.
119891252 by aleksaJov @ 2022-04-19 07:18	1	2022-04-28 12:07	trigpoint	You do seem to be adding pointless duplicate name tags, which just adds clutter and makes it harder for unpaid mappers who look after their own local areas to spot the important tags, OSMs most valuable resource are these unpaid volunteers. You don't need to add translated names where they d...
119990551 by borovac @ 2022-04-21 09:16	1	2022-04-23 20:21	trigpoint	This relation is for the adin area City of Leicester, yet you have added a large number of duplicates which simply say Leicester. There is no point adding duplicate name tags. Please could you also use meaningful human readable changeset comments which describe what you have done so that the loca...
	2	2022-04-25 11:09	Richard ♦220	Indeed, this is just wrong: the "City of Leicester" administrative area is not the same as "Leicester". @borovac, UK administrative boundaries and naming is really complex, and I'd suggest it's probably not the easiest thing to tackle from Serbia unless you have a fu...
	3	2022-04-27 14:08	borovac ♦103	Hi, Thanks for your feedback. @trigpoint I wanted to add different language names and mistakenly corrected wikidata. I see how some of the names can feel redundant having the same form. I reverted my changes so that they don’t make a confusion and will try to be more descriptive in my comm...
	4	2022-04-28 12:02	trigpoint	Thank you for your reply, however you have not answered my question as to where these edits were discussed with the UK community, I would expect a minimum of a post to the talk-gb mailing list. You do seem to be adding pointless duplicate name tags, which just adds clutter and makes it harder for...
	5	2022-04-28 14:06	borovac ♦103	Hi Phil, Apologies for not responding. We regularly always contact the community prior to any editing, but due to a small miscommunication this was not done on talk-gb. We are correcting this issue now and are also communicating with members of OSM Data Working Group to reformat and add any missi...
	6	2022-04-28 16:12	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	Hello borovac, I know that you've already removed the data added here, but For the avoidance of doubt, you can't use wikipedia as a direct source of names as its licence is not compatible with OpenStreetMap. You may, of course, be able to use whatever source wikipedia's data was cop...
	7	2022-04-29 11:40	borovac ♦103	Hi Andy, Thanks for the clarification. Since we’ve seen a lot of possible misinterpretations, we’ve stopped adding different language names for now. If it’s ok with you, I, or some of my colleges may contact you directly in the future if we encounter any ambiguities regarding li...
119678023 by Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle @ 2022-04-13 17:03	1	2022-04-23 21:21	Nathan_A_RF ♦219	Isn't it implied that the maxheight on a motorway is default unless stated otherwise?
	2	2022-04-24 08:06	Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle ♦6	Perhaps. Either way, that's apparently not what StreetComplete was seeing as it offered the prompt. I think maybe it's just an unknown until defined or something, not sure.
	3	2022-04-24 18:01	Nathan_A_RF ♦219	Regardless, the height tag should only be applied to a section of road directly under the bridge, as the wiki recommends
	4	2022-04-25 11:06	Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle ♦6	Yeah, that makes sense. I did go down the whole road, to be sure, but yes that would make more sense.
	5	2022-04-25 11:06	Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle ♦6	Maybe I'll file a bug and let them know. Can you point me at the relevant wiki page?
	6	2022-04-25 12:01	trigpoint	I suspect the bug you should be reporting is that it is checking motorway bridges at all. If a motorway bridge is anything other than default then there has been an epic fail on behalf of the builders. https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues
120051550 by Jacksonville @ 2022-04-22 13:32	1	2022-04-23 21:09	trigpoint	Hi, what is the source of this name. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-04-24 17:11	Jacksonville ♦11	Hi Phil, are you talking about the Urdu name?
	3	2022-04-24 17:50	trigpoint	I am, it seems unlikely that such a small place has a non-local name, that is normally for big cities.
	4	2022-04-25 05:40	Jacksonville ♦11	The source for this comes from the name of the game "Bethesda" https://www.bbc.com/urdu/science/2016/04/160408_bafta_game_awards_rwa (You can CTRL + F "بتھیسڈا"), but for a lot of the other places, I've been transliterating them based on local sources, and langu...
70532380 by cryptickryptos @ 2019-05-22 22:26	1	2022-04-17 16:46	trigpoint	Hi, just found this after reading the Guardian Article. The cinema tag seems a bit wrong is it not? Cheers Phil
	2	2022-06-05 20:03	cryptickryptos ♦33	Hi, apologies for the late response. There is a small rentable space in the building somewhere that can be used to project tapes and DVDs on. In a previous discussion with ndm (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70526562), I decided to keep both shop=video and amenity=cinema.
119556837 by fgupanki @ 2022-04-11 03:41	1	2022-04-13 12:22	trigpoint	Hi, this changeset has gone badly wrong. Whilst Doodle Alley may be a dead end for vans, it is most certainly not a dead end for all modes using OSM. The fact it was joined in the first place should has set the brain cells going. The solution is clearly visible on mapillary which you have sait you w...
	2	2022-04-15 14:44	fgupanki ♦1	Hi, Thanks for bringing this up. Apologies for the genuine mistake from my side and I will make sure that this will not be repeated going forward. I have modified based on latest aerial imagery. I have added cycle path based on your suggestion as a part of changeset (119754228) Thanks again. Happy...
	3	2022-04-15 14:48	trigpoint	Thank you for fixing
119615000 by SammyTheSnake @ 2022-04-12 10:26	1	2022-04-13 09:59	trigpoint	There is a separately mapped footway here, therefore the correct tag is sidewalk=separate, no is incorrect. Cheers Phil
119614779 by SammyTheSnake @ 2022-04-12 10:21	1	2022-04-12 16:50	trigpoint	Whilst this edit is not technically wrong, walking is not illegal, it would be better not to tag foot=yes here, A case of let sleeping dogs lie. Cheers Phil
119212614 by trigpoint @ 2022-04-01 17:59	1	2022-04-03 12:06	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	Looks like this deleted part of the Shropshire Way?
	2	2022-04-03 12:19	trigpoint	Whoops I had. not sure how. The bridleway to Moss Lane had been par of the relation and had intended to just remove it. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7708228 Cheer Phil
118414697 by ianc @ 2022-03-12 22:50	1	2022-03-27 11:05	trigpoint	Hi Ian Thank you for your edits, however the access tagging you have used is a bit strange as it prevents use of bridleways on foot and bike which is how a bridleway is defined in England and Wales. If you are going to tag them as access=private you do need to also include foot=designated and bicyc...
	2	2022-03-27 12:30	ianc ♦16	No worries - the access=private won't have been mine (at least not deliberately), but some people get too whingy if you tamper with their work and frankly life is too short, so unless there is a compelling reason I tend not to. So I just did the stuff I know from memory, a cousin who has been w...
118751403 by gpulham @ 2022-03-21 20:16	1	2022-03-22 13:01	trigpoint	Hi Are you sure that Tesco doesn't open until 08:00, seems very late. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-03-23 02:59	gpulham ♦2	That's right, it's a typo when I was on my phone. I've updated it now. Thanks!
118641765 by user_5359 @ 2022-03-18 17:28	1	2022-03-18 18:53	trigpoint	Hi Stone is a very odd material for a gate, I would have thought the obvious fix for wod would be wood. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-03-18 18:59	user_5359 ♦19,410	Hi Phil, Thanks for pointing that out, I have no idea why I made the mistake! Regards. Georg V.
85962715 by Velella @ 2020-05-29 18:58	1	2022-03-16 00:08	trigpoint	Hi, I am a bit confused by this changeset. Has the coastal path really been routed along the road as other than OSM I can find no other source for this change. Cheers Phil
117829630 by trigpoint @ 2022-02-24 22:21	1	2022-03-11 11:10	ohmanger ♦39	Just a note that Lunts has relocated to the new Riverside site and the building is now owned by The Salopian (same goes for the building to the west).
	2	2022-03-14 09:24	trigpoint	Thank you, I was using some old images but have since spotted it has gone. I really need to go and survey The Salopean :)
118059766 by ohmanger @ 2022-03-03 15:19	1	2022-03-09 12:51	trigpoint	I am a bit confused by this one, I have never found a corridor here. You can cut through shops, but it would be wrong to route pedestrians that way. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-03-11 16:52	ohmanger ♦39	Hi Phil, yes this is just the H&M store. Anecdotally it is used as a shortcut by quite a few people, but I agree it would be a bit weird to be routed this way. I have removed the way, although as far as I can tell there isn't anything on the wiki saying not to map inside shops.
117942374 by s4br1 @ 2022-02-28 12:09	1	2022-02-28 17:40	trigpoint	The tag service=alley is a very odd way to describe way 120282236 which is correctly described as highway=unclassified is it not?
	2	2022-02-28 18:24	s4br1 ♦6	There's a sign saying "unsuitable for motor vehicles" so I was indicating that it should not be used to route between the B5063 and the lane going onto Salters Mill. Perhaps "motor_vehicles=discouraged" would be better? Open to suggestions.
	3	2022-02-28 18:56	trigpoint	motor_vehicle=discouraged would be a better tag although it is one of those places where you wonder why the sign is there. A hgv would.struggle, but its fine in a car. Cheers Phil
	4	2022-03-01 09:13	s4br1 ♦6	I double-checked the OSM wiki and it says that "service=alley" is used for "a narrow service road usually located between properties to provide access things such as back gardens, rear entrances, fire exits, and storage areas". That sounds about right - it's narrow and provi...
	5	2022-03-01 09:34	trigpoint	Simply tagging it as motor_vehicle=discouraged is adequate, it is afterall a public highway and no narrower than many other roads in the area. It is afterall the responsibility of a driver to not blindly follow their satnav. This road is absolutely fine for cars, and is one where I wonder abou...
	6	2022-03-01 09:53	Richard ♦220	motor_vehicle=discouraged is a much better tag from a bike routing point of view!
	7	2022-03-01 10:02	s4br1 ♦6	That makes a lot of sense, Richard. Phil - I appreciate that the road appears fine, but surely we shouldn't be second-guessing what the signs are for either? I'll change it to "motor_vehicle=discouraged" as it's an accurate reflection of signage and probbably the most ...
	8	2022-03-01 11:24	trigpoint	Thank you. However I am not basing my views on imagery and that it appears ok. They are based on real world experience and local knowledge which is the gold standard in osm. This section of road is fun :) Cheers Phil
117858101 by s4br1 @ 2022-02-25 18:04	1	2022-02-28 17:42	trigpoint	You seem to have lost the highway tag on 480061272.
	2	2022-02-28 18:25	s4br1 ♦6	Thanks - corrected.
117724654 by Mapd123 @ 2022-02-22 12:11	1	2022-02-25 12:06	trigpoint	Has https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034146531 reopened? It closed several years ago and last time I went by it was boarded up. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-02-25 15:06	trigpoint	It is very definitely closed and part of the construction site although the building looks to be being retained. Where precisely did you source the care home details from? Cheers Phil
103046158 by ohmanger @ 2021-04-16 09:11	1	2022-02-24 11:54	trigpoint	Ignore it? I had never even noticed it :)
	2	2022-02-24 13:22	ohmanger ♦39	Ha yes, I only clocked it after they trimmed the bushes back. Legally this toll is supposed to apply to cycles/motorcycle traffic, which I'm guessing is why the main barriers don't extend the whole way across.
117697841 by Mapd123 @ 2022-02-21 19:23	1	2022-02-21 21:45	trigpoint	Just wondering why you have removed the wikidata tag from Northwood?
	2	2022-02-22 08:16	Mapd123 ♦6	My mistake, oops.
109995866 by Hiblet @ 2021-08-20 16:11	1	2022-02-18 16:26	trigpoint	Please do not add cartpaths to public highways, leisure centres of carparks. OSM should only reflect what is in the real world. Rubbish removed.
110943895 by Adamant1 @ 2021-09-09 02:49	1	2022-02-18 08:10	trigpoint	Hi, this is not a charity shop, why did you change it? Cheers Phil
	2	2022-02-19 00:55	Adamant1 ♦222	Five months ago is a pretty long time to remember. Although I do research on things before I changed them. So I'm sure there was a reason. That said, originally it was tagged as shop=thrift. Both that and shop=charity make a lot more sense then shop=recycle. Whatever nonsense that is. I don...
	3	2022-02-19 01:01	Adamant1 ♦222	So I looked at their Facebook/Website and they sound like a charity shop. Especially going by the definition given for one on the Wiki. So what's your specific with it being tagged as one, how does your disagreement related to the definition in the Wiki article, and how is that my issue when I&...
	4	2022-02-19 01:06	Adamant1 ♦222	For that matter shop=art would be 100 times more descriptive then shop=recycle if you just have something in your craw about shop=charity for some reason. Personally, I could go with either shop=charity or shop=art.
111077734 by esteros @ 2021-09-11 21:21	1	2022-02-07 11:55	trigpoint	Hi, in this changeset you have mapped a path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/982094029 which is causing rather a lot of concern on @talk-gb. I am wondering what sources you used, have you walked it or were you using some other source? Cheers Phil
117042323 by trigpoint @ 2022-02-05 12:17	1	2022-02-05 12:30	Mapd123 ♦6	Fair enough, however, in that case, what are the tags greenfield and brownfield correct usage?
	2	2022-02-05 13:03	trigpoint	Brownfield is for land that has previously been developed and the development is then cleared. When, or if, development starts then it will become construction. However that will need a survey, we cannot copy from planning applications.
117017351 by trigpoint @ 2022-02-04 18:12	1	2022-02-04 18:51	Mapd123 ♦6	Why have you reverted my changes - there was absolutely nothing wrong with them?
	2	2022-02-04 18:53	trigpoint	You used a source which is a breach of copyright, we absolutely must not copy from other maps
117015934 by Mapd123 @ 2022-02-04 17:33	1	2022-02-04 18:09	trigpoint	We are not allowed to use the OS Mapping which is included in the planning application site. The copyright statement at the bottom of the map makes that very clear. We have no complete, opendata, source of addresses at this level in the UK. The only way to gather address data is to go out and sur...
117004466 by oakred @ 2022-02-04 12:19	1	2022-02-04 14:05	trigpoint	Hi Welcome to OSM, thank you for your edit however please keep your changesets to sensible areas. This one should have been three, one for each area. Also please use meaningful changeset comments which describe your intentions, uhh just made me immediately question your edits. OSM is a database...
116876709 by Mapd123 @ 2022-02-01 16:52	1	2022-02-02 19:15	trigpoint	Hi, you have made several errors in this changeset. 1. Wem's Kitchen is a takeaway, why would you change it to a restaurant? 2. Monks is a shop, not an office. It has big windows and displays which are useful outside of opening hours, 3: Why have you removed the tunnel from Maypole Court to ...
	2	2022-02-02 19:29	trigpoint	5. Advertising on the noticeboard by the library is prohibited, amenity=notice_board
	3	2022-02-02 19:43	trigpoint	Sorry, realised that you didn't change the noticeboard.
116579669 by Tim457 @ 2022-01-25 10:55	1	2022-01-29 19:44	trigpoint	Hi, what is the source of this edit? Was this a recent survey? The only reason I ask is that I have been meaning to update Carluccio's as it is now a different Italian restaurant. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-01-29 21:37	Tim457 ♦4	I haven't surveyed, I was just going on general knowledge. I know a number of their branches have closed recently, and I hadn't got round to checking if this was one of them
	3	2022-01-30 13:59	trigpoint	I have updated the POI with its current name / fhrs / website.
	4	2022-01-30 17:18	Tim457 ♦4	Great, thanks for clearing that up!
115024652 by brianboru @ 2021-12-16 20:48	1	2022-01-30 13:13	trigpoint	Again I do not believe this is a foodbank. c/o in the address suggests this is an admin contact. locations,geojson does seem to be rather more sane than foodbanks.geojson and suggests that the foodbank is at the Salvation Army. But again is just a postcode centoid, not an actual location and i...
	2	2022-01-31 12:48	brianboru ♦158	Thnks for correcting
114968311 by brianboru @ 2021-12-15 15:02	1	2022-01-30 13:05	trigpoint	Hi, I am fairly certain this is not the location of a foodbank or if this is actually 157. It appears to simply be a postcode centoid. Cheers Phil
115159337 by brianboru @ 2021-12-20 10:35	1	2022-01-29 20:43	trigpoint	Hi Brian The location of the foodbank looks to be quite a way out. What source did you use as based on the address I would not have put it here. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-01-30 02:18	trigpoint	It appears that this location is the postcode centoid of the postcode given on the website, however the website is very clearly wrong giving totally the wrong postcode. I have moved the location of the POI to a more sensible location and have removed to erroneous
	3	2022-01-31 12:46	brianboru ♦158	Hi Phil I've corrected most of them when editing but this is getting outide my area. For source see source tag Regards Bran
105269597 by jgopatho @ 2021-05-25 07:16	1	2022-01-29 17:17	trigpoint	Maybe spend an extra few seconds improving the usefulness of the map by adding the car park which is far more useful than parking aisles. Cheers Phil
	2	2022-01-31 13:14	jgopatho ♦9	Hi Phil, Thanks for flagging this with me. I will definitely keep this in mind while making future edits and pass it on to my supervisor for larger visibility. Happy to learn from you Phil. Thanks and Regards, jgopatho.
116354101 by trigpoint @ 2022-01-19 18:32	1	2022-01-20 16:07	Mapd123 ♦6	just wanted to let you know that it was not a fictional name as it is documented with this name on Google Maps: https://www.google.com/maps/@52.8460014,-2.727209,17z
	2	2022-01-20 17:00	trigpoint	Thank you for you comment however the first and most important point is that we absolutely not allowed to use google maps when mapping in OSM. Using such data could put the entire project at risk. The houses are addressed as Shrewsbury Road, so other than a prohibited source is there any other ev...
116206328 by Mapd123 @ 2022-01-16 09:00	1	2022-01-16 14:22	trigpoint	Why have you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/718122173 to unclassified? In real terms I would describe it as a track, but in OSM terms it is service with restricted access for motor vehicles. Cheers Phil
116207078 by Mapd123 @ 2022-01-16 09:35	1	2022-01-16 11:40	trigpoint	Unclassified implies public access for motor vehicles, which these are not. They were correctly mapped as service. What is the source of the name as there are no signs? Cheers Phil
115378831 by DankJae @ 2021-12-26 08:42	1	2022-01-06 18:57	trigpoint	Bore da In OSM we tend to go with the rule that on the ground and surveyed will always trump official databases. Name:cy=Llys Bedydd is surveyed information so that really should be the name:cy (When doing mapio cymru stuff a few years back) https://cy.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llys_Bedydd also back...
	2	2022-01-07 18:10	DankJae ♦17	Noswaith dda, I will go through the list again, maybe one or two names in the database I do not recognise as a local, (namely Plas Madog, which although reverts the anglicisation of -dog like in Porthmadog, I rarely hear it over Plas Madoc). Many of these places lack a sign (although they may sha...
	3	2022-01-07 18:11	DankJae ♦17	I'd like to add, in terms of Bettisfield, local signage I see does not use "Llys Bedydd" just Bettisfield (even alongside bilingual street and warning signs) I rarely find sources for "Llys Bedydd" (with ones found either based on Wikipedia or very historical sources), that ...
	4	2022-01-07 18:28	trigpoint	My source is the sign outside the church, it is reasonably local to me as I am in neighbouring Wem https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/7063498 Diolch Phil
	5	2022-01-07 18:46	DankJae ♦17	Ah, very well, I'll revert it Diolch, Jay
114777850 by Tema_Ded @ 2021-12-10 10:03	1	2021-12-13 13:42	trigpoint	This is a major step backwards in terms of osm mapping practice. Why are you removing tags from buildings and moving them to nodes? In this case you have also thrown away surveyed building type information and replaced it with yes.
	2	2021-12-20 08:14	Tema_Ded ♦4	Thanks for the feedback, I'll take it into account. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114777850
114580701 by trigpoint @ 2021-12-05 12:41	1	2021-12-05 13:23	trigpoint	Reverted my duplication
114547144 by ALu68 @ 2021-12-04 08:26	1	2021-12-05 00:51	trigpoint	Why have you changed this? It was accurately surveyed and mapped describing the building type along with its current usage. The type is obvious to anyone who surveys it. By armchairing away those tags, you have lost important surveyed information and left it as it may as well be a modern concr...
114289856 by Mapd123 @ 2021-11-27 10:41	1	2021-12-01 18:10	trigpoint	In the UK, where we do not have anti-pedestrian jaywalking laws the the consensus is the map sidewalks as part of the road using sidewalk=left/right/both. Where there is a separation it important to provide good connectivity. Some odd routing otherwise occurs https://www.openstreetmap.org/dire...
114239399 by Mapd123 @ 2021-11-25 21:50	1	2021-11-28 18:43	trigpoint	Hi I am not sure this change from doctors to clinic. In UK terms this is certainly a doctors (doctors surgery). What prompted you to make this change? I am aware that some recent changes to the clinic wiki page are confusing, but it does not fit the UK consensus. Clinic is something that vari...
	2	2021-11-29 17:21	Mapd123 ♦6	I will return it to a doctors.
	3	2021-11-29 17:28	trigpoint	Thank you
114104536 by Mapd123 @ 2021-11-22 16:05	1	2021-11-22 17:48	trigpoint	Just wondering why you have joined the boundary of the business park to the centreline of the restricted byway, which is outside the fence? Cheers Phil
114106098 by Mapd123 @ 2021-11-22 16:47	1	2021-11-22 17:39	trigpoint	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1004645242 can hardly be described as farmland, scrub going back to nature is the best definition I can come up with since I walk it regularly. Cheers Phil
114086909 by Mapd123 @ 2021-11-22 08:25	1	2021-11-22 09:12	trigpoint	I am concerned that you are adding a large number of postcodes on residential properties. If there was an open usable source they would have been added a long time ago so wondering what source you are using? Cheers Phil
114071478 by Mapd123 @ 2021-11-21 20:03	1	2021-11-21 20:16	trigpoint	How exactly is deleting other mappers work improving the map. Hedges are important features. Cheers Phil
114051539 by Mapd123 @ 2021-11-21 10:06	1	2021-11-21 12:15	trigpoint	Hi, what source are you using for postcodes? We do not have a practical open source that can be simply linked to addresses? Cheers Phil
	2	2021-11-21 18:24	trigpoint	I have also spotted that your changes have misaligned this area. Wem has been very carefully mapped and aligned over the last 10 years, and has been a testbed for new ideas. It has been very carefully aligned, you must never assume that arial imagery is correctly aligned, it rarely is. We have la...
	3	2021-11-23 07:47	BCNorwich ♦4,856	Hi, I've removed duplicate service highways, Way: 1004877388, Way: 1005017919, Way: 1005325608, and part of Way: 1005325605 from this and some of your other changesets. Please be careful not to place highways, (or parts of highways), on top of other highways. Regards Bernard.
114018528 by Mapd123 @ 2021-11-20 08:12	1	2021-11-21 13:19	trigpoint	This edit has gone rather wrong. You have changed Wem Co-op from Mid Counties to the Co-operative group which is clearly an error. The tags had been carefully selected. Why did you change this? You have also deleted the service area on Aston Road Business Park, again why. The tagging was correct....
	2	2021-11-21 13:22	trigpoint	Following on from the last part You should not blindly believe what iD suggests, it is not authoritative. OSM tagging is built through consensus and usage. As you can see from this edit it has got the co-op badly wrong. Cheers Phil
113910291 by Mapd123 @ 2021-11-17 18:14	1	2021-11-19 12:32	trigpoint	Thank you for your edit, the name did need updating, I had missed that one. However I am wondering why you changed the informative building=retail to a very generic building=yes? That is throwing away surveyed data. Yes is an indication that either the mapper didn't know and an indication th...
109093268 by Saaji4444 @ 2021-08-03 12:26	1	2021-11-19 12:24	trigpoint	What oneway system?
	2	2021-11-19 12:45	Saaji4444 ♦1	Issue resolved now. Note #2784542
113702665 by Mapd123 @ 2021-11-12 16:03	1	2021-11-13 16:11	trigpoint	Why have you moved the location of the Wem node? The position is chosen so that if someone requests they satnav to take them to Wem, they end up in a sensible place (such as the High Street). The middle of the school field is not sensible. Cheers Phil
113454796 by trigpoint @ 2021-11-06 17:03	1	2021-11-09 14:50	mueschel ♦6,574	Hi, you added several ways like this one, without usual tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/999985906 Could you check that?
	2	2021-11-11 20:49	trigpoint	Thank you for spotting this. They are land registry cadestral parcels which I was using and intended to remove. Missed these but gone now. Cheers Phil
113344612 by Mapd123 @ 2021-11-03 18:30	1	2021-11-10 23:59	trigpoint	This edit has gone a bit wrong. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204021859 is certainly not a building, it was correctly tagged as a yard, and the name was and still is on the relation. It is certainly not Furrows. Cheers Phil
113492297 by Mapd123 @ 2021-11-07 18:47	1	2021-11-10 23:54	trigpoint	Hi, this edit seems a bit strange. What issues were you trying to fix? You have removed the detailed building=roof and replaced it with building=yes, which you only use if you don't know, You have removed the highway=service and area tags from the forecourt and transferred the amenity=fu...
113611398 by s4br1 @ 2021-11-10 14:41	1	2021-11-10 19:44	trigpoint	Hi, track describes this better than a footway. Also as this is a restricted byway then it is a bit wider than a footpath. I would have left this as a track, however it could be describes a bridleway. Cheers Phil
112953573 by s4br1 @ 2021-10-25 15:37	1	2021-11-05 17:27	trigpoint	Hi, I am not convinced that the weight limit applies only too the bridge. It also applies to the road. Although a bit of an oddity as it only applies in one direction or more likely the TRO has only be implemented by Shropshire. Cheers Phil
	2	2021-11-05 17:28	trigpoint	Brickhall Lane that is
	3	2021-11-05 17:36	s4br1 ♦6	Fair point - I have applied the restriction also to the Shropshire side of the road.
112839818 by trigpoint @ 2021-10-22 14:03	1	2021-10-25 13:55	BCNorwich ♦4,856	Hello trigpoint (Phil I think), I just wanted to let you know there's a lot of untagged ways in this changeset. Regards Bernard.
	2	2021-10-25 13:58	trigpoint	Hi Bernard, it is still a work in progress. I am planning to do more and either use and tag of remove them. Cheers Phil
	3	2021-10-28 12:11	user_5359 ♦19,410	Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247846182: What is the meaning of the key gml_id?
	4	2021-10-28 18:42	trigpoint	I missed that one and will remove it, it is from Land Registry opendata.
	5	2021-10-28 20:25	CjMalone ♦233	Just a heads up, if you are gonna work with this dataset you need to project it properly. Aligning to it with JOSM bad projection isn't going to help. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995571275 This one specifically is about a meter out.
	6	2021-10-29 13:55	trigpoint	I am aligning to Land Registry Cadestra parcels, which is about the best we have.
	7	2021-10-29 20:34	CjMalone ♦233	Yeah, I made that tile server. Run dataset through ogr2ogr to fix the projection locally. Something like: ogr2ogr -s_srs "+proj=tmerc +lat_0=49 +lon_0=-2 +k=0.9996012717 +x_0=400000 +y_0=-100000 +ellps=airy +units=m +bounds=-9,49,2,61 +no_defs +nadgrids=/home/cj/.local/share/QGIS/QGIS3/p...
112804125 by s4br1 @ 2021-10-21 17:55	1	2021-10-21 18:47	trigpoint	Hi Again I am wondering what the source of these edits is. I am puzzled what you were trying to achieve by setting https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30408422 to motor_vehicle=no? Whilst there are blue 'unsuitable for motor vehicles' signs they are legally allowed to use it and need to...
	2	2021-10-21 19:23	s4br1 ♦6	Again this was information given to me by a local truck driver. I searched around and found this post about someone else who wondered how best to represent this in OSM: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/6287/unsuitable-for-vehicles-text-sign However their solution wouldn't work as thi...
	3	2021-10-22 12:07	trigpoint	> I believe it just has a really worn surface that gives rise to those signs. That is correct, and had me puzzled when you mentioned bin lorries. The poor surface only really affects small wheeled vehicles, in a car you have to take it carefully. There is a farm on that road and bin lorries d...
	4	2021-10-22 15:47	s4br1 ♦6	Many thanks for the advice. The crew I spoke to was specifically referring to Drakey Lane joining the B5063 to the tertiary way with ID 369403093. Their comment was "Lane not suitable for motor vehicles take next right turn [from the B5063] to Horton". There are no bin collections along...
	5	2021-10-24 14:42	Richard ♦220	Adding motor_vehicle=discouraged is a good way of mapping roads where motor vehicles are allowed but there's signage discouraging use. highway=service should only be used in a rural context like this if you add access tags (i.e. motor_vehicle=, bicycle=, foot=, horse=...). Otherwise it'...
	6	2021-10-25 17:23	trigpoint	I have updated https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30408422 to reflect legal access, changed motor_vehicle to discouraged and added weight and smoothness tags.
112902642 by Mapd123 @ 2021-10-24 11:37	1	2021-10-24 12:44	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edits however please use meaningful changeset comments that explain to other mappers what you are changing and why. Cheers Phil
112747078 by s4br1 @ 2021-10-20 14:23	1	2021-10-20 22:03	trigpoint	Grade 5 seems rather unlikely, imagery suggests grade 3. What street level imagery was available here?
	2	2021-10-21 09:00	s4br1 ♦6	I had based this on the following streetview image. On checking the osm wiki I realise I'd misunderstood the category. https://www.google.com/maps/@52.9096251,-2.5020162,3a,47.1y,157.13h,80.12t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sFySDAY-G5CSLR5LULZnPjQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
	3	2021-10-21 17:49	trigpoint	Thank you for your comments however we can't use Google Street View or other Google products as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. I am going to have to revert these edits. Which other edits have you used Google Streetview for as these wi...
	4	2021-10-21 19:11	s4br1 ♦6	I'm basing my edits on a review by local refuse collection vehicle crews. They have identified roads that are unsuitable for use by their HGVs but for which the OSM data is not sufficiently tagged and is therefore causing them to be routed down roads that are in fact inaccessible to them. The e...
97110574 by AdVerburg @ 2021-01-07 12:51	1	2021-10-20 23:02	trigpoint	I think the name slipped a bit, have fixed it. Cheers Phil
112706340 by s4br1 @ 2021-10-19 16:17	1	2021-10-20 21:59	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to OSM. I am a little concerned as to why you have changed ways 144589140 and 142495281 to prevent vehicles when they lead to houses and a farm. How do the residents get there, how does amazon deliver? Access=private was correct. Cheers Phil
	2	2021-10-21 09:01	s4br1 ♦6	Have undone these changes.
81366400 by marcoSt @ 2020-02-23 13:15	1	2021-10-16 15:50	trigpoint	Hi Some of this edit seem very strange. You have changed several nodes which were correctly tagged as railway=shuttle_train into level crossings. Eurotunnel would be a very odd place to find a level crossing. Just wondering why you thought the original tag was incorrect? Cheers Phil
112510841 by iWowik @ 2021-10-14 16:15	1	2021-10-14 17:16	Lee Carré ♦665	Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
	2	2021-10-14 19:24	trigpoint	It is a smallish area, just happens to cross 180 degrees within a single country
	3	2021-10-15 08:55	Lee Carré ♦665	Sigh. Fine. Smaller BOUNDING BOXES, please.
112370670 by DzmitryBachkarou @ 2021-10-11 11:25	1	2021-10-11 11:54	trigpoint	Hi A turn restriction here isn't quite correct as at this point Garstang Road is divided. It would be preferable to split Garstang Road at this point and allow the resulting oneway to take care of routing. Cheers Phil
	2	2021-10-11 11:55	trigpoint	https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=278744020613521
	3	2021-10-12 09:11	DzmitryBachkarou ♦5	Hi, Cheers Phil. Did not make a Dual carriageway in this place, because there is a lot of bus relations and there is no data to make them right.
112339206 by trigpoint @ 2021-10-10 15:47	1	2021-10-11 01:50	Yorvik Prestigitator ♦151	Hi, Grade II is more normally written using roman rather than arabic numbers
	2	2021-10-11 09:28	trigpoint	Thank you, you are correct. I will update those tags.
112328871 by davidvaughan @ 2021-10-10 10:58	1	2021-10-10 11:41	trigpoint	Hi Welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edits, they are very useful. You can put the route code into a prow_ref tag and add designation=public_footpath. One small problem, you do need to provide connectivity to the road, otherwise routers will see it as a dead end and not route over it. Her...
111093296 by John Murrell @ 2021-09-12 12:13	1	2021-09-13 10:00	John Murrell ♦4	I intended to close the station as it has been moved but the building still exists. \|Removing the user appears to have demolished the building accidentaly but has left the name tag which I had edited to (old) lifeboat station.
	2	2021-09-18 12:11	trigpoint	Hi John When using iD to make changes to an object it is best to keep within the tags dropdown which allows you to update only those tags which have changed. At top level iD is rather clunky. I have restored the building, please could you check I have done it correctly? Cheers Phil
	3	2021-09-18 17:26	John Murrell ♦4	Thanks Phil, That looks Ok to me - I am very much a learner at making changes - I thought I had just changed the name but somehow I must have done more than that and as you saw the name remained but could not be edited as \\I could not select it. I tried to revert my changes to try again but could ...
86708812 by ansukess @ 2020-06-16 08:36	1	2021-09-17 15:55	trigpoint	Hi, why would a way drawn through a car park that is already tagged as access=customers be private? Cheers Phil
	2	2021-09-27 07:40	mundlk ♦19	Hi Phil, Thanks for bringing this to us. Our editor might have missed checking the landuse feature and added access=private based on the gate visible. Apologies for the genuine miss. We have now added access=customers as it seems the right edit to be done. Best Regards, mundlk. PS: Replying on...
111077374 by cadamswaite @ 2021-09-11 21:02	1	2021-09-16 11:45	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits. NPE is a very strange choice of imagery to be using in 2021, it is only one inch to a mile and better out of copyright sources are available such as the 1:25k OS maps which include the field boundaries which are vital for mapping rights of way. ...
111261018 by KetoCat @ 2021-09-15 20:08	1	2021-09-16 10:58	trigpoint	Hi There is a facebook tag for facebook pages, they should not be tagged as a website. This pub also has a proper website however which should be tagged using the website tag and is obviously preferred over facebook. Cheers Phil
110935022 by Barry86m @ 2021-09-08 19:07	1	2021-09-15 14:31	trigpoint	Strangely enough I drove this road this morning, and the signs were definitely green indicating in UK terms it is part of the primary road network. Not a motorway, but certainly the best and most important road in the area. The tagging we use in the UK does a very good job of classifying the networ...
	2	2021-09-16 01:48	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111266298 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some road classification changes in the UK. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110881337 et al.
97124240 by SeanDS @ 2021-01-07 17:52	1	2021-08-05 12:35	trigpoint	Which is correct here? Is the school building abandoned, i.e. derelict or is it just a building that is no longer a school. The tags abandoned:building=school and building=yes contradict each other. Cheers Phil
	2	2021-08-29 09:35	SeanDS ♦3	Thanks for the feedback. It's an abandoned school, not used for anything else since. I'll fix that.
109188600 by Arrowtaxigroup @ 2021-08-05 08:53	1	2021-08-05 09:20	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edit. The level crossing nodes should be at the point where the road itersects with the railway. The road is however still tagged as construction so nothing will route over it. Your edit suggests that this is now open, is that the case? Cheers Phil
	2	2021-08-08 21:34	◪ Jarv ♦240	This is a bridge, there are no level crossings here.
108423488 by ojlena @ 2021-07-22 11:09	1	2021-07-22 11:36	A67-A67 ♦932	This is incorrect. The Caribean parts of the Kingdom of the Netherlands are not in timezone Europe/Amsterdam.
	2	2021-07-22 11:40	trigpoint	Hi, I am not sure that this edit makes much sense. Whilst it is true that the European part of The Netherlands is within the timezone you have added, it is pretty unlikely that the parts of the relation that are in the Caribbean are on CET. Cheers Phil
	3	2021-07-22 18:43	Lee Carré ♦665	Previous commenters have a good point (and thanks for the hint about timezone=*). However, I'm here to plead for smaller changeset areas.
	4	2021-07-24 07:11	limes11 ♦892	@Lee Carré: Not all large changeset areas are bad. It's unavoidable if relations such as the Netherlands are touched. In this case, the update is wrong, though.
84260418 by apjgilbert @ 2020-04-28 10:52	1	2021-07-11 00:37	trigpoint	Hi Just wondering why you have removed the amenity=pub from the Ty Coch. It doesn't appear to be closed. Cheers Phil
	2	2021-09-25 13:01	TrekClimbing ♦60	I was coming here to wonder the same. I'll add it back given there was no response. There are some covid related arrangements but it's still a pub.
107150501 by fb22 @ 2021-06-29 13:09	1	2021-07-04 16:15	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits. However I am a little confused by this one, what source have you used as I have never seen a weight restriction sign for this bridge? Cheers Phil
	2	2021-07-05 08:12	fb22 ♦1	Hi Phil, thanks for your comment - I've now realised I've edited the wrong bridge, as this applies to Morris Bridge (1 further along the canal to the west), apologies! I'll remove this edit now. I work for a company that routes bin lorries and we were advised by our client that they c...
	3	2021-07-07 11:50	trigpoint	Thank you Freddy This is another usecase of our data I had never considered. But it does make a lot of sense. Cheers Phil
107316933 by Holly_Tree @ 2021-07-02 14:52	1	2021-07-02 15:02	stick2 ♦36	The solar panel removed, NE corner of Bramley Close, looks fairly clearly there on Bing imagery.
	2	2021-07-02 15:09	trigpoint	You have also deleted part of Mirabelle Road, is there really no connectivity?
	3	2021-07-02 15:16	Holly_Tree ♦2	There is definitely no connectivity, it is private land (an area of gravel) surrounded by heras fencing. No junction to Gotherington Lane.
	4	2021-07-02 15:22	trigpoint	No even on foot?
	5	2021-07-02 15:22	Holly_Tree ♦2	Not even on foot
	6	2021-07-02 15:23	Holly_Tree ♦2	Unless you want to climb two fences and trespass.
	7	2021-07-02 15:32	trigpoint	Thank you. it just looks very odd that a co-op would be built with new houses so close and not to provide a sustainable route between them.
	8	2021-07-02 15:37	Holly_Tree ♦2	Agreed, and local residents hate having to explain to delivery drivers how to get into the estate when maps like this show a junction. There’s a planning application in progress for a community centre on the site.
106975483 by trigpoint @ 2021-06-25 17:08	1	2021-06-29 15:05	CjMalone ♦233	You deleted address data in this, please revert.
	2	2021-06-29 17:30	trigpoint	Reverted as requested. Sorry didn't see the later versions only the spam and verbal diarrhea.
	3	2021-06-29 21:18	CjMalone ♦233	Thanks, postcodes are a bit of a target for me at the moment, I'll take any source I can.
106908397 by KetoCat @ 2021-06-24 15:08	1	2021-06-24 17:44	trigpoint	Are you sure? It looked closed the other week, I meant to tag it as such.
	2	2021-06-24 20:17	KetoCat ♦3	Hi trigpoint, I see online that it's been up for sale. Sorry, should I have put it as closed? Streetcomplete is a tad basic and limited as what I can do with it (largely just following questions rather than thinking outside of the box with a full pallette). Sorry if I've made an error. I...
	3	2021-06-25 14:51	trigpoint	Have fixed it
106625075 by wttc @ 2021-06-19 09:49	1	2021-06-19 20:19	Brian de Ford ♦5	Oh joy, we're having the Cardigan name edit wars again. FWIW, I'm happy with Aberteifi / Cardigan or Cardigan / Aberteifi. However... You've managed to swap the name:cy and name:en. And somewhere along the way the English Wikipedia page has been discarded in place of the Welsh...
	2	2021-06-24 18:40	trigpoint	osm,org supports wikipedia:en=Cardigan and wikipedia:cy=Abertefi which I have used in various places in Wales.
106128789 by kumrnls @ 2021-06-10 05:32	1	2021-06-10 17:01	trigpoint	Hi Covererd is a very odd tag to use here, what were you intending? Cheers Phil
	2	2021-06-11 04:14	kumrnls ♦6	Hi, Thanks for checking into my edit. Looks like I have by mistake added covered tag while adding unpaved tag. I genuinely apologise for this miss from my end. I have deleted the tag as per your suggestion (changeset: 106185486). I'll keep a track of this in my future edits. Regards, Kumrn...
105311748 by KetoCat @ 2021-05-25 19:08	1	2021-05-25 20:33	trigpoint	Hi Ramp=no is incorrect here, Hermitage Walk is the 'ramp'. The correct tag here is ramp=separate. Cheers Phil
105304653 by ohmanger @ 2021-05-25 16:32	1	2021-05-25 19:13	trigpoint	Hi, the bus lane along Castle Gates has been removed or maybe suspended. I would not map it until it returns. Cheers Phil
105170167 by Kingston Arms @ 2021-05-23 14:56	1	2021-05-23 17:37	BCNorwich ♦4,856	Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your website link isn't valid. Regards Bernard.
	2	2021-05-25 19:11	trigpoint	There should be no www in the url http://kingstonarms.co.uk/ Cheers Phil
105145107 by FrankSkye @ 2021-05-22 19:30	1	2021-05-24 11:42	trigpoint	Please try to keep your changesets to smaller areas as it makes it dificult for local mappers to work out where changes have been made with large changes such as this. Here it would have been far easier if the Somerset and Shropshire changes were in separate changesets. Cheers Phil
105185006 by KetoCat @ 2021-05-23 21:08	1	2021-05-24 11:36	trigpoint	Hi, thank you for your edit however this has duplicated the name of the school. School names belong on the campus, not the building. I have removed the name from the building. Cheers Phil
74167209 by contrai1 @ 2019-09-06 10:23	1	2021-05-24 11:29	trigpoint	Hi, this edit has gone very wrong. From a simple look at aerial imagery it is very clear that most of these 'service roads' you have mapped are clearly footpaths and are therefore not routable by vehicles. Cheers Phil
	2	2021-05-25 15:21	hemasvn ♦17	Hi Phil, Thanks for looking into our edit. The editor is out of Organization (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Amazon#Previous_users). Hence, Replying on behalf of him. Looks like the editor hasn't considered the road width and misinterpreted the segment to be a...
105091961 by jakedowner @ 2021-05-21 13:01	1	2021-05-22 09:44	trigpoint	You have go this wrong again, the speed limit through the centre of Troed-y-rhiw is 20 mph. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/6071403
105092039 by jakedowner @ 2021-05-21 13:03	1	2021-05-21 16:26	trigpoint	Again what sources are you using for these edits and what dates are they from? Again you seem to have a problem with 20 mph. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/6071486
105030696 by jakedowner @ 2021-05-20 12:59	1	2021-05-20 17:17	trigpoint	This edit has gone very very wrong. You seem to have changed some admin levels to 60 which is clearly wrong. Also you have yet to comply with https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
104441694 by Alfikk @ 2021-05-10 10:11	1	2021-05-10 11:17	GinaroZ ♦1,280	Hi, you don't need to add foot/motor_vehicle=yes or oneway=no tags to highway=residential as these are the implied defaults :)
	2	2021-05-12 10:39	trigpoint	Also motor_vehicle=yes on a footway is rather odd, is this really a footway if motor vehicles can use it and what of bikes and horses?
	3	2021-05-12 12:26	GinaroZ ♦1,280	Removed that as it's clearly just a footway
104403922 by m-a-p @ 2021-05-09 16:54	1	2021-05-09 17:14	trigpoint	Hi Changeset comments should inform other mappers what you are intending with the changes you make. Simply the word Edits is stating the obvious and has no value whatsoever. Please take a few seconds to descibe what you are changing. Cheers Phil
104210067 by Danielhol @ 2021-05-05 22:25	1	2021-05-05 23:24	GinaroZ ♦1,280	Hi, what is your source for this edit?
	2	2021-05-05 23:35	Danielhol ♦1	Hello Ginaro. Second by second GPS analysis of the road at Google Street View Level. There are road signs that separate the different speed limits along various sections.
	3	2021-05-06 14:35	GinaroZ ♦1,280	Thanks for the reply, though I'm not exactly sure what you mean by the GPS analysis. But if you are using Google Street View to see where the speed limit changes then that it is not allowed for mapping in OSM.
	4	2021-05-06 15:22	Danielhol ♦1	Hi Ginaro. Thanks for coming back to me. We receive customer feedback, and then look at the GPS data on our side to understand where the speeding anomaly they've reported might lie in the data. My apologies, I wasn't aware that Google imagery wasn't allowed. I will avoid this moving f...
	5	2021-05-07 08:09	trigpoint	Hi Dan If you are working on behalf of a company or as part of an organised effort then you will need to make sure that whoever is asking you to do the updates follows https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines . There's nothing too onerous there - most of it's just...
104256988 by jakedowner @ 2021-05-06 13:38	1	2021-05-06 14:24	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits however I am intrigued by what streetlevel imagery is available here? Cheers Phil
	2	2021-05-06 14:46	jakedowner ♦3	Hi Phil, their is a road speed sign at the beginning of the updated section showing the road speed should be 60mph
	3	2021-05-06 14:51	trigpoint	Thank you for your response, but did you personally visit the location? My question was what streetlevel imagery are you using? As I did not think we had any at that location.
	4	2021-05-06 14:59	jakedowner ♦3	I work for a telematics company and our customers which have telematics devices fitted to their vehicles provide us with feedback and evidence of incorrect road speeds they have been caught on which prompts the updates i have processed.
	5	2021-05-06 15:06	trigpoint	If you are working on behalf of a company or as part of an organised effort. Not that there's anything wrong with that (quite the reverse!) but if you are doing this then you will need to make sure that whoever is asking you to do the updates follows https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organise...
103851650 by een9mds @ 2021-04-29 14:27	1	2021-04-29 15:04	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit however according the wiki denomination= \tjehovahs_witness is the correct tag. It seems a bit wrong to include the name in the denomination tag. Cheers Phil
	2	2021-04-29 15:07	trigpoint	Except my mistake is that the denomination should be mormon. Cheers Phil
	3	2021-04-30 08:11	een9mds ♦1	This is a common misunderstanding.. 'Mormon' is an unofficial or nickname of a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It is not a denomination. If 'the church of jesus christ of latter-day saints' is not considered a suitable denomination 'Restorationist&...
	4	2021-04-30 08:33	trigpoint	I am only going on what the wiki says and hence how other mappers map these objects https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:denomination%3Dmormon
103700681 by mundlk @ 2021-04-27 11:01	1	2021-04-28 12:53	trigpoint	Access=agricultural really has no legal meaning in the UK. If a track is only accessible to the landowner then it should be tagged as access=private however that is not the case for this track as it is legally a public road. You can legally drive any vehicle here, walk, ride a bike or horse. I se...
	2	2021-04-28 15:05	mundlk ♦19	Hi Phil, We have recently received requests from our delivery associates and station associates regarding this road. They confirmed with local residents and mentioned road is only for farm/agricultural purposes. Please refer to this image (https://snipboard.io/sUYABy.jpg) for road condition. We und...
	3	2021-04-28 15:23	trigpoint	Hi Mundik This road is certainly a legal right of way, it is not unknown for local residents to try to deter access (especially in COVID times) and it is my job to ensure they don't succeed, Looking at the photo I would remove access=agricultural and add surface=unpaved tracktype=grade4, fo...
	4	2021-04-29 06:55	mundlk ♦19	Hi Phil, I have made edits according to your inputs. Please let me know if I need to further edit anything. Thanks for looking into our edits. Always happy to learn from the community. I have made the changes in the following changeset: 103819895. Thanks and Regards, mundlk.
	5	2021-04-29 20:41	trigpoint	Thank you
103619910 by BiviBag_ADV @ 2021-04-26 08:43	1	2021-04-29 14:31	trigpoint	Hi, thank you for your edit however names should be only used for the actual name of an object and not for descriptions. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions Cheers Phil
	2	2021-04-29 17:51	BiviBag_ADV ♦1	Thank you for your feedback. This was neither an object, nor a description. It was a Changeset Comment which you seem to have misread
	3	2021-04-29 18:17	trigpoint	I was commenting on name='Public Convenience' which is a description.
103690911 by peaksandpuddles @ 2021-04-27 09:02	1	2021-04-28 21:05	TomJeffs ♦26	I mean it doesn't make much difference tbh, but it is signed as a cycleway. It's also named after an Olympic cyclist. https://www.stockport.gov.uk/cycle-routes/alan-newton-way
	2	2021-04-29 11:27	peaksandpuddles ♦1	They do seem to have managed to install the low-level signs incorrectly. This path definitely has equestrian access, while the path into Woodbank Park is foot/cycle only. Just thought it was helpful to clarify.
	3	2021-04-29 11:35	TomJeffs ♦26	It isn't currently shown on Stockport's definitive map which suggests it isn't a bridle path - https://www.stockport.gov.uk/stockport-public-rights-of-way/prow-map The map may be out of date though, I don't know the area well enough to look for any definitive map modification ...
	4	2021-04-29 12:09	peaksandpuddles ♦1	Fair enough, they are planning to add it as as a defined PROW but obviously haven’t got that far yet!
	5	2021-04-29 15:22	trigpoint	I would probably go with highway=cycleway here. Highway=bridleway evokes a muddy track in a rural setting. The important tag will be designation=public_bridleway however don't forget to add horse=designated. Cheers Phil
103852200 by opendcc @ 2021-04-29 14:38	1	2021-04-29 14:46	trigpoint	Why have you made this series of changes? Has it been discussed anywhere? The language of OSM is English and the correct term in English is lift. Elevator is an Americanism. Cheers Phil
	2	2021-04-29 17:37	opendcc ♦1,535	Hello, nearby is highway=elevator, why use different keywords for the same purpose? Why not highway=lift?
89559509 by mundlk @ 2020-08-18 08:03	1	2021-04-24 20:55	trigpoint	Hi, the source you have used seems very odd. Why would Cardiff City Council have a road closure here? What other evidence is there to suggest this road is closed for construction? Cheers Phil
	2	2021-04-27 15:13	trigpoint	I would imagine the road closure the document is referring to is hereabouts in Cardiff. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13412838#map=17/51.52815/-3.13412
	3	2021-04-27 16:16	mundlk ♦19	Hi, Thanks for your review and comment. We have made the changes based on our delivery partners feedback and the one.network resource (https://snipboard.io/XOcbmB.jpg). By mistake I copied a wrong datasource link into my changeset comment. When the edit was made, there was no clear mention of the ...
	4	2021-04-28 12:55	trigpoint	Thank you however the picture you have now shared is just for roadworks and possible delays. It says nothing about a road closure. Mapping roadworks such as this in the OSM database is not a bad idea. Often they fail to be removed, as as happened in this case and therefore has been directing ever...
	5	2021-04-28 14:23	mundlk ♦19	Hi, Thanks Trigpoint for sharing your thoughts. Back then multiple of our delivery partners were blocked to travel through this road completely. Hence made the changes considering the local inputs. But I do find your inputs valid as we can see in the following case. Unless we have a clear road clos...
103602332 by amanura @ 2021-04-26 04:38	1	2021-04-27 13:58	trigpoint	Hi, when mapping please ensure that you merge your mapping with existing mapping. In this changeset you have duplicated a way and given the impression that the right of way is a separate way, which it is clearly not. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173303585 should have been, realigned and exte...
	2	2021-05-13 10:30	amanura ♦14	Hi Trigpoint, Sorry for the delay in response as i was in long leave. Thanks for looking into my edits. As the history dated 2012. I misjudged it to be an outdated edit. However, as I was unaware I have digitized a new service road as per Bing aerial imagery. Apologies for the genuine miss. I agr...
103645846 by viplavm @ 2021-04-26 15:06	1	2021-04-27 09:44	trigpoint	Hi Please consider the access and routing implications when mapping service road links between public highways. The ways you have added here are clearly through a farmyard and therefore need to be tagged as access=private. Cheers Phil
	2	2021-04-27 12:22	trigpoint	Sorry, just realised you didn't create the routable link. It was added by one of your colleagues. Cheers Phil
103327834 by Carl Nisser @ 2021-04-21 09:38	1	2021-04-21 17:15	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit however we do not have permission to copy from or use google maps. Also when adding names to objects please use proper capitalisation, lower case looks very poor quality. Cheers Phil
	2	2021-05-21 09:32	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105078961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a source=google changeset in London. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103327834.
102424204 by vmoura @ 2021-04-06 17:33	1	2021-04-17 12:06	trigpoint	Please be careful when mapping speedlimits. You are still making serious errors, particularly with 20 mph zones, again you have mapped roads which are 20 mph as 30 mph. I have fixed your errors. Cheers Phil
102912173 by vmoura @ 2021-04-14 08:03	1	2021-04-17 11:19	trigpoint	The 60 mph limit does not extend to the roundabout. There is a 40 mph zone which I have added.
102671857 by JMc-ITS @ 2021-04-09 21:39	1	2021-04-16 14:45	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to OSM thank you for your edit however you have added incorrect speedlimit data. Where did you obtain the GPS traces you are using and what visual confirmation did you use? Also what does ITS stand for? Cheers Phil
	2	2021-04-16 15:27	JMc-ITS ♦1	Hello, please don't remove my speed limit edit which you think is wrong. If you know that its wrong then why not add the correct speed and improve the data.
	3	2021-04-16 15:33	trigpoint	I am intending to map the correct speed limits once I finish processing my video files. However you have not answered my questions. Cheers Phil
	4	2021-04-16 15:47	JMc-ITS ♦1	A driver traveled through here less than 2 weeks ago and reported that the speed limit was 60. You will see this when you have watched your video. So my edit is correct, please don't be detrimental to the data by removing correct edits and not adding anything back at all.
	5	2021-04-16 19:36	trigpoint	I see that you colleague has added the 50 mph section, although I have fixed his 30 mph section at Penley, it is 20 mph. Your driver must have been mistaken if he thought the limit was 60. Sorry but going from knowing there are limit changes in a section to finding an processing imagery takes time,...
103038818 by coolmule0 @ 2021-04-16 07:27	1	2021-04-16 07:42	coolmule0 ♦7	part of #ukqp
	2	2021-04-16 11:36	trigpoint	What does #ukqp mean?
	3	2021-04-16 11:37	trigpoint	Sorry, got it UK Quarterly Project
102928960 by Carldobs @ 2021-04-14 12:04	1	2021-04-16 11:16	trigpoint	Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8629001726 is really preventing access? Hook Park Lane is tagged as a byway which indicates that it is a legal right of way making this gate either odd, or illegal. By tagging this as access=no you are preventing pedestrians using this route...
100180827 by Carldobs @ 2021-03-01 07:27	1	2021-04-16 11:08	trigpoint	Is this really a dual carriageway? It looks like a single carriageway on bing imagery. Cheers Phil
102889219 by redd @ 2021-04-13 21:34	1	2021-04-14 12:36	trigpoint	Hi The UK community have obviously been discussing tagging of beer gardens and outside seating areas in the past few days. Whilst in this case I probably didn't choose the best tag in landuse, simply moving the surveyed information that there is a garden here to the fact that you can sit do...
	2	2021-04-14 14:21	redd ♦390	Hi Phil, thanks for the response to my change. There were only 2x landuse=beer_garden in whole UK and even worldwide. A beer garden is obviosly not well defined yet.. it can be all kind of outside sitting places.. does not even need a "garden" at all.. see picture search: https://duckduc...
102705997 by jackyu_m @ 2021-04-10 16:16	1	2021-04-10 16:35	trigpoint	Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however I believe this task has been stopped. Many of the buildings you have mapped do not match the real outline. For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/928909762 overlaps an already drawn building and you have included the garden within the...
102427082 by anandanilkum @ 2021-04-06 18:50	1	2021-04-09 13:08	trigpoint	Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong. You seem to have added a short section of primary road over a residential road. You have also added a number of poor quality buildings, please ensure they map the actual outline and you use the Q key to square them. Cheers Phil
102595615 by robyyen @ 2021-04-09 01:26 Active block	1	2021-04-09 11:35	trigpoint	Please do not add public roads in quarry, the HOT task is about adding buildings. Your edits are extremely damaging. I am reverting this edit.
	2	2021-04-17 15:29	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems. See...
102595146 by robyyen @ 2021-04-09 00:57 Active block	1	2021-04-09 11:34	trigpoint	Please do not duplicate roads, the HOT task is about adding buildings. Your edits are extremely damaging. I am reverting this edit.
	2	2021-04-17 15:29	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems. See...
102595048 by robyyen @ 2021-04-09 00:50 Active block	1	2021-04-09 11:31	trigpoint	Please do not duplicate roads, the HOT task is about adding buildings. Your edits are extremely damaging. I am reverting this edit.
	2	2021-04-17 15:29	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems. See...
102594964 by robyyen @ 2021-04-09 00:46 Active block	1	2021-04-09 11:31	trigpoint	Please do not duplicate roads, the HOT task is about adding buildings. Your edits are extremely damaging. I am reverting this edit.
	2	2021-04-17 15:29	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems. See...
102594816 by robyyen @ 2021-04-09 00:37 Active block	1	2021-04-09 11:30	trigpoint	Please do not duplicate roads, the HOT task is about adding buildings. Your edits are extremely damaging. I am reverting this edit.
	2	2021-04-17 15:29	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems. See...
102587072 by chichungchao @ 2021-04-08 19:36	1	2021-04-08 20:34	trigpoint	Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927881965 and other buildings you have drawn are not single terraces, there are service ways passing between them so they should be split. Cheers Phil
102536325 by robyyen @ 2021-04-08 07:36 Active block	1	2021-04-08 19:28	trigpoint	You have added a lot of place=village, which is clearly not what is here. Please only add what is verifiable on the ground.
	2	2021-04-17 15:29	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems. See...
102539005 by robyyen @ 2021-04-08 08:00 Active block	1	2021-04-08 19:17	trigpoint	This edit is very damaging, please do not add random roads to OSM
	2	2021-04-17 15:29	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems. See...
102545565 by robyyen @ 2021-04-08 08:58 Active block	1	2021-04-08 19:16	trigpoint	This edit is very damaging, please do not add random roads to OSM
	2	2021-04-17 15:29	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems. See...
102537962 by robyyen @ 2021-04-08 07:50 Active block	1	2021-04-08 19:09	trigpoint	In this change you have duplicated many roads with secondary, this is very damaging and I am reverting this edit.
	2	2021-04-17 15:29	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems. See...
102523966 by RBao @ 2021-04-08 05:25	1	2021-04-08 15:45	trigpoint	Hi, in this edit you seem to have created a very small duplicate hospital. I have removed this duplication. Cheers Phil
	2	2021-04-21 21:13	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103364617 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. No reply to previous changeset comments.
102488198 by PhilBike24 @ 2021-04-07 13:49	1	2021-04-07 16:09	trigpoint	Hi, thank you for your edit. In OSM we should not copy from third-party plans without explicit permission. The gold standard in OSM is to simply go and have a look and map what you have seen and use source=survey. Cheers Phil
102440180 by lukelly @ 2021-04-07 03:08 Active block	1	2021-04-07 12:30	trigpoint	Just wondering why you added a motorway here?
	2	2021-04-17 22:20	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103119426 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case, the mapper has been contacted previously and even the most recent edits have problems. See https://www.openstreetm...
	3	2021-04-18 13:39	SomeoneElse ♦13,390	Hello, I'm just adding a note here because https://weeklyosm.eu/archives/14443 has linked to this changeset. As you can see from my comment above, the DWG was asked by HOT to revert a number of poor-quality edits (performed by a company that had just found the tasks on HOT's website; n...
102458219 by robyyen @ 2021-04-07 07:43 Active block	1	2021-04-07 12:23	trigpoint	Bore da Croisi Y OSM, place=village is a very strange way to tag houses and gardens. Please take care to capture what is actually visible on imagery. Diolch Phil
	2	2021-04-08 18:02	brianboru ♦158	If they're not appropriatey tagged and aligned within a couple of days I propose deleting them
	3	2021-04-17 15:29	SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems. See...
102233276 by DankJae @ 2021-04-03 12:03	1	2021-04-03 12:39	trigpoint	Hi Names in OSM are for things that have an actual name, in the case of roads have an actual sign. Please do not add descriptions to the name tag. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things Cheers Phil
101181262 by elliobur @ 2021-03-17 10:41	1	2021-03-29 19:52	trigpoint	I have changed this to a track, it is certainly not a footpath and it is certainly usable by farm vehicles. The edit history suggests it may be used by Amazon vans. Cheers Phil
	2	2021-03-30 07:49	elliobur ♦4	This again was backed up by photographs from Driver's who have shown it is both not safe and not accessible to be driven down in vans
	3	2021-03-30 08:10	trigpoint	Who are you working for? Please read a conform to https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines before making further changes to the map. Tagging in osm is about what is legal, not what is safe or possible for vans. This track is used by agricultural vehicles and is legal ...
	4	2021-04-03 11:23	trigpoint	This route is a legally a bridleway. Have added appropriate access tags, setting the middle track section to private for motor vehicles which will prevent motor vehicles from being routed that way whilst maintaining access for foot/bikes/horses and farm vehicles Cheers Phil