| Changeset |
No. |
Date |
Contributor |
Comment |
|
| 50258949 | BCNorwich | Way: 507325975 remove self intersection of area outline and courtyard |
| BCNorwich | Way: 507325954 same |
| BCNorwich | Way: 507325955 same |
| BCNorwich | Way: 507326037 and again |
|
| 32523185 | BCNorwich | removing several duplicated wood areas |
|
| 50407111 | BCNorwich | Way: (508713808) delete duplicated/self intersecting outline of playground which included building |
|
| 50376348 | BCNorwich | Way: 508410491 fixed self intersection of area outline. |
|
| 50223952 | BCNorwich | Hello, same problem here as with Manor Road. I've removed the duplicate and placed your new oneway tag on the existing section of Vicarage Road after appropriately splitting it.Regards Bernard |
| Amberwood | Hi.No problem - my first attempt at adding updates. Manor Road looks good but not sure why Vicarage Road is not showing one way at all now?? |
| BCNorwich | Hello, the section of Vicarage Road from the cycleway (just south of Manor Gardens) south to Manor Road is tagged as oneway going southwards. This is how you had tagged it. Could you refresh your browser or reload the page that shows the oneway not appearing please? Then see if the oneway appears.... |
|
| 49504883 | BCNorwich | way_id: \t500205241 fixed self intersection |
| BCNorwich | Way: 500205246 fixed self intersection |
| BCNorwich | Way: 500205249 fixed self intersection |
|
| 49505427 | BCNorwich | Fixed self intersection on Way: 500209862 |
| BCNorwich | Way: 500209558 fixed self intersection |
|
| 49504992 | BCNorwich | Way: 500206241 fixed self intersection |
|
| 50257796 | DaveF | Hi RowlandTo map entities with voids in the middle we use mulipolygon relations: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygonhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507315798 |
| BCNorwich | I've pointed out this problem (through changeset comments) to mapper Rowland many times and corrected dozens of these instances. Despite this there has been no response from Rowland and data continues to be added incorrectly. Rowland also maps land/building areas on top of existing land/building a... |
| DaveF | Rowland was/is under an acknowledgement ban so unable to message via changeset, but I did receive a DM (although it didn't really address my concerns). It's surprising someone with 7K edits is unaware of MPs & his 'blitzkrieg' mapping technique of not tidying up after himself is *very* annoying. |
| Rowland | Dozens is a little bit of an exaggeration, as it was once this year, and once in 2015 |
| BCNorwich | Yes once this year and once in 2015 are the commented changesets.Dozens is likely an understatement. Your attention was probably only drawn to the ones I commented on (even though the comments seemed to provoke no response). The dozens of self intersecting outlines on areas (buildings, water, wo... |
|
| 50224114 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I looked at your alterations to Manor Road and see that you inadvertently added two more highways atop the existing ways. The best way to achieve amendments like this is to edit the existing way, this also allows the history of change to be kept intact. Triplic... |
|
| 50057641 | BCNorwich | Hello There, just wanted to point out that buildings with courtyards do not have to have self intersecting outlines. Regards |
| ndm | See discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50257796Looks to be semi-automated import of OSOpenMapLocal items. |
|
| 50398003 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended your opening hours and address tagging to suit OSM best practice. The world will now be better informed of your business. Regards Bernard |
|
| 48990358 | BCNorwich | Hello, just wanted to point out that I think this is the 2016 route not the 2017 route.There are several problems with it anyway. It crosses over on itself three times. Crosses existing roads without joining about ten times. Crosses water five times with no indication as to the manner of crossing.... |
|
| 50320182 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've adjusted the opening times tag to suit OSM practice (months not indicated are taken as closed), and removed house_number=.Regards Bernard |
|
| 50299786 | BCNorwich | Hello, this way (the steps) does not join to the old railway path. |
| Gammer_edit | Maybe you would like to explain further instead of leaving it hanging in the air. I am a beginner. A solution or advice would be preferable. |
| BCNorwich | Hello, no offense intended, some folk don't take kindly to being offered advice. Right, I take it that the steps are intended to join the old railway. So that you have a route from the road along the path, then the steps and onto and along the railway. SatNav routing can then follow this route.\... |
|
| 50205780 | BCNorwich | Hello there, I'd just like to point out that for the way south from Ham you have mapped two ways (a highway=bridleway and a highway=unclassified). You've also tagged the access as (in parts) private, yes, permissive. Your new way does not join with Ham Road, and the highway=road close to Ham Road,... |
| Gammer_edit | The road south from Ham is a permissive bridleway on both a private and public road. |
| BCNorwich | Hi, yes I can see that but you have drawn two roads/highways, one on top of the other. Between the road junction at Ham and your mapped permissive bridleway which goes eastwards. The manner to map this is to consolidate all relevant tags on just one highway. To have two highways one on top of the ... |
|
| 50285817 | BCNorwich | No need for website tag to be duplicated. Duplicate has been removed, regards. |
|
| 50200322 | BCNorwich | Hello there, it's not usual to tag buildings as landuse=residential better to use building=residential on the building and landuse=? on the area.Anyway the buildings you have retagged look like they are the old school buildings not the new houses. so the whole area needs to be redrawn.Regards Be... |
|
| 50152259 | BCNorwich | Hi, the drinking water is already mapped so I've removed this duplicate. Regards. |
|
| 50147783 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.St Pancras International Station is already mapped, the POI just a few yards away from your POI. So I have removed this duplicate.Regards Bernard |
|
| 50137086 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The new line you have added to the live worldwide OSM database in Primrose Grove has no tags to describe what it is. It is therefore of no value to OSM. Further it in part duplicates the line of an existing way (a footpath). Also one branch of your way ends wit... |
|
| 50042175 | BCNorwich | Hi, Revert changeset to regain the original history (history was lost when houses redrawn, best to adjust whats already mapped thus keeping the history intact), remove the duplicate building, redraw the buildings, properly tag addresses to conform, change ele to conform. |
|
| 50074162 | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see your original POI has been removed from London.You are now on the correct continent and near the right city, but the POI is still incorrectly placed for that address. If you need any help please just ask, I could fix it if you wish?One other thing, why d... |
|
| 50054103 | BCNorwich | Hello, I've made corrections made to the address so that it conforms to OpenStreetMap best practice.Regards Bernard |
|
| 44687575 | nammala | Hi skyegod,Thanks and contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind adding cricket pitch and football pitch in the Imagery. It seems to be inappropriate in the Map. Could you please confirm.Regards,nammala |
| BCNorwich | Descriptive names removed. |
|
| 48448591 | BCNorwich | Duplicate way removed, the original way should be amended not another way placed on top of it. |
|
| 48452747 | BCNorwich | The maxwidth must refer/be connected to the highway, not a node unconnected to the highway. "Width Restriction" is a description not a name.The width must be in the correct manner (maxwidth=6'6") to be recognized.Nodes are removed as I cannot correct them. |
|
| 49055183 | BCNorwich | Name corrected |
|
| 49055528 | BCNorwich | Address corrected |
|
| 49981649 | BCNorwich | According to their website which I've added the name is "Saracens". I've amended accordingly. Regard |
|
| 49982367 | BCNorwich | Hello, this POI has several problems, the city, postcode, street and name should use capitol letters. There is no hospital or emergency facility. There is nothing nearby named "entrance_to_surgery".I have properly added the address to Bayfield Surgery building, also added the website, s... |
|
| 49772047 | BCNorwich | Removed duplicate building (502893780), several buildings can easily be seen here. |
|
| 49807303 | BCNorwich | Removed duplicated way. |
|
| 49807157 | BCNorwich | Hello There and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended your house and garden additions to better tie in with the way that these items are usually mapped/tagged. Regards Bernard |
| TRUDGILL | Thank you Bernard. |
|
| 49596240 | BCNorwich | Thank You |
|
| 49930441 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your changes/additions ref The Relay Building have resulted in the adjacent building being dragged out of shape. Also there is now a building on top of another building. I would suggest you revert your changes and try again but please properly inspect your chan... |
|
| 49763583 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Did you mean to amend the name of that section? Because nothing has changed. Princes Walk needs to be split into two sections at the corner then the north section renamed. If you need help or would like it amended for you please just ask? Regards Bernard |
| Larkmeadow | Hi Bernard,I cannot figure out how to make these changes!I noticed that that small section of road parallel to the main road was incorrectly shown as Princes Walk when it should be Normanston Drive. (ie The same as the main road. I know, I used to live there!) It only becomes Princes Walk at the... |
| BCNorwich | Hello Bill, I'll guide you on how to proceed with the iD editor.Highlight/select the way (road) you want to edit in this case Princes Walk.Place your cursor/pointer over the node (small circle) at the point you wish to divide the road into two sections.Right click the node, you get a drop down... |
| BCNorwich | Forgot to say if you want to insert a node to split a way at another place other than an existing node. Place cursor at the position and double left click. |
| Larkmeadow | Think that's done now, thanks.Much easier on a laptop than on a phone ! |
| BCNorwich | Yes looks OK!Bye! |
|
| 48695845 | BCNorwich | Hello,Your mapping of the Port Salford Greenway is done in a way that duplicates some highways, (particularly Grange Road, Farm Road). Is there a separate cycleway here? If not the the cycleway status should be tagged/drawn as part of the existing highway. Duplicating highways disrupts routeing on... |
|
| 49261631 | BCNorwich | Hello Sidewalk beside a highway a better tagged as part of that highway except if separated by a barrier of some kind. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk I've removed this footpath because mapped such it is on top of the road, makes a duplication and messes wi... |
|
| 49662127 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have removed your advertising nodes.There are not two shops in the middle of the street. Your business is online and does not to my knowledge have a high street outlet that could be mapped, (not even an office). Regards |
|
| 49319306 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your highway changes to their original state. Reason being that no missing road section was added, two roads were duplicated and a 20mph limit was removed.I can't actually see what you wanted to achieve but if you can explain maybe someone can h... |
| Supabento | When I was looking at the map it appeared that the sections I added were missing from the map. I was using the satellite view if this makes any difference? Apologies for the confusion. |
| BCNorwich | No problem, does the map you're looking at look OK now? If not could you give a link to it? Regards Bernard |
| Supabento | Yeah it looks fine now |
|
| 27960712 | BCNorwich | Hi Node: 3273481349 tagged as a stile is not connected to a highway therefore it cannot be determined to which way the stile is a barrier. (The barrier (stile) should be connected/joined to the way it disrupts). Regards |
|
| 49577143 | BCNorwich | Hello There, just wanted to let you know that the park area (453552380, v2) has become distorted. Regards |
|
| 49571035 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Can you explain your reasoning for placing a highway=rest_area here please? I refer you to :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_areaIt does not look like a conventional rest area so I'll remove the node if I don't get a comment. Regards. |
|
| 45179522 | BCNorwich | Hello There, Just wanted to point out that the way "highway=unclassifiedref=U3064" (south section) that you've added duplicates the ways that are already mapped on that route. The duplication of highways seriously disrupts any attempt by software to route over these ways.At the river y... |
| andyfrizzle | BCNorwich, Thanks for the feedback. I've reviewed and hopefully correctly amended the highways. |
| trigpoint | Hi Andy, I have a few concerns about these edits.You have changed this way from a track to unclassified and included the surface=unpaved, in the UK it is reasonable to expect an unclassified road to be surfaced, I believe that unless it has been surfaced it should have been left as a track.What ... |
| andyfrizzle | trigpoint, I dont want to start an argument of any sort, but it was my understanding that contributors to the OSM project should make their contributions as accurate as possible, and that has been my intention, based on facts.The road, edited by myself, is an unclassified road, lawfully usable b... |
| SK53 | This does indeed appear to be classified as an unclassified road by the county council. There will always be edge cases where the rules-of-thumb fall down, and this is one of them. I don't believe that it should be mapped as such on OSM: highway=track is much more appropriate. A couple of important ... |
| Richard | highway=unclassified, surface=unpaved is ok but slightly unidiomatic for UK mapping. There's nothing wrong with it per se - there are lots of dirt roads in the States mapped that way, for example - but it's slightly unexpected in a UK context where highway=unclassified isn't used by custom for such ... |
| SK53 | *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org |
| andyfrizzle | Thanks for the further input, I have no problems making the amendments as suggested prior. Northumberland has a vast network of unsurfaced unclassified roads with vastly varying roads surfaces. I would not be surprised is there are more than a hundred in this county alone. I will try and work throug... |
| SK53 | Thanks Andy. I've added this to the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#Unpaved_Country_Roads. It's largely based on the discussion here, but I should also add some examples from Northumberland too. I think pressure of use in SE England, Peak District etc has l... |
|
| 49453088 | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed your residential area (Cardea) from because it was within another residential area (duplication), I've added a new place=suburb (Cardea) to reflect your new residential area. |
|
| 49347901 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just wanted to let you know that if you zoom in the houses can be drawn with more precision and therefore more detail, then square the corners up. You end up with a beautifully rendered map.If you need any help please just ask, Regards Bernard |
|
| 49330466 | BCNorwich | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, please be advised that your hotel is already mapped to the OSM database, thus the new POI is remove as it is a duplication. |
|
| 49136116 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've updated your tag information to conform to OSM best practice. Regards |
|
| 49048106 | BCNorwich | Hi, your new information tourism=attraction has been added to the existing mapped features, the duplicate features therefore unneeded are removed. Regards |
|
| 49302884 | BCNorwich | It may be used as a park but it is officially a registered common. |
|
| 46228521 | BCNorwich | Hi, I think something might have gone wrong with the grass, heath and residential areas, (squared off and now have self intersections on the outlines). Regards |
|
| 49213798 | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've added back the landuse=recreation_ground tag to Ketts Park. The park is a recreation ground and indeed Ketts Park is a Community & Recreation facility.An area can have several descriptive tags (a landuse and an amenity tag).Regards Bernard |
|
| 48788012 | BCNorwich | Hi, can you give more details about the park the name perhaps. Because that area contains much that does not look like a park. Thanks. |
| BCNorwich | No response so what looks like fiction is removed. |
|
| 48940122 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I reverted your recent changes to OSM because I can find nothing to verify them as available to general folk. They look like a route used by a select group and thus are not suitable for OSM. By all means please use OSM to create your own routes (and even print th... |
|
| 49011903 | BCNorwich | Hello there and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your changes because they drag some highways a long way out of position.You may not be aware of this happening. What you inadvertently uploaded to the database is immediately used to change the map used by folk all over the world. So pleas... |
|
| 48968375 | BCNorwich | This business was mapped as a POI, I have amalgamated all info on one POI and removed the duplicate. Regards. |
|
| 48820669 | BCNorwich | Hi, Did you mean for FP 60 to join onto Great North Road? because now it only goes to the edge of the wood area. Regards Bernard |
| Laurie_cs | Originally yes, but on reflection I will extend to the road. Local maps show the path only going to the woods, OS map shows the path going to the road. will extend and thanks for your comments. Laurie |
|
| 48919218 | BCNorwich | Several of the buildings redrawn without the self intersection on the outlines. Please have a look it's easy to do. |
|
| 48915141 | BCNorwich | Hatfield Police Station And Magistrates Court (495456784, v1)This is duplication and outline has self intersection, (not to OSM best practice) so removed. |
|
| 48913237 | BCNorwich | Hello, I removed the sidewalk tags, they are used on a footpath beside a road but separated from the road usually by a kerb.Removed several duplicated sections of path and tidied up some paths, circularised a couple of paths. Regards Bernard |
|
| 48761767 | BCNorwich | Adjust areas, remove self intersecting section, remove duplicated areas from school. |
| BCNorwich | Expand abbreviation of church name. Adjust building outlines. |
|
| 48836669 | BCNorwich | Hi, you've placed the node (1689605515 105 Fenchurch St) on the party wall between two buildings. |
|
| 48826117 | BCNorwich | I set post code to OSM standard. |
|
| 48797678 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your moving of the footpath has also dragged the roads at each end out of place. May I suggest reverting the changes and starting again. I can revert everything back as it was for you if you wish. The two roads need to be corrected as now routing is messed up. Re... |
| Laurie_cs | Just looked at the roads and they appear ok, but if you think they are wrong please revert all changes and I will try to move the footpath again. The Great North Road appears strange it has 3 lines connecting to each other.Laurie |
| BCNorwich | Hello, the problems with Dancers Hill Road are the same as the Great North Road. What has happened is that the path has been dragged to a new position without it being disconnected from the two roads. This inadvertently pulls the two roads out of shape by the same amount. The path has then been amen... |
| BCNorwich | Forgot to say I can see what you are trying to do and could make those changes if you wish, though I'm sure you'd like to do it yourself. |
| Laurie_cs | Thanks for the explanations and correction, As you rightly point out I would like make the changes, correctly, myself. This is the first one I have tried. Again thanks for your help, this is a very useful tool. I have UK Maps on my phone and they take a lot of info from the OS maps but do not hav... |
|
| 48786832 | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.You drew the park area again rather than updating/adjusting the existing mapped area. I have removed the duplication and tagged the area as park, leaving existing tags and history in situ.Regards Bernard |
|
| 48724108 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your POI guest house is placed in the roadway. As such and without an address, name or other contact info it is of little or no use to anyone. Could you please rectify this if not the POI will be removed in due course. Regards Bernard |
| trigpoint | It translates as Oli's House, suggesting that this is yet another maps.me personal marker.I am reverting this rubbish |
|
| 48726525 | BCNorwich | Hello your POI appears in the middle of a street far away from the stated address. If this is a mistake then please be advised that the POI has been removed so you can try again.In which case help is offered if you need it, just ask.If however this is just crude advertising (which it looks like) t... |
|
| 48711831 | BCNorwich | Hello you inadvertently added a highway=footway tag to the outline of part of a residential area (making it the longest footway I've seen). I have now removed the footway tag. Regards Bernard |
| lyut | Thanks for spotting that, silly mistake on my part. |
|
| 48692464 | BCNorwich | If your changeset statement is correct then you've placed this POI in the wrong position. That hotel is south of here. Regards Bernard |
|
| 48679239 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I can find no reference to a government office of this name and the area is residential. Could you please give more information, address and point to the actual building. Thanks. |
|
| 48660987 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your leisure centre building outline is lacking in detail compared with the background image. It is also a duplication, thus I have removed the duplicate taking care to transfer your address tags onto the original building. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 48646265 | BCNorwich | Reverted your change. Byron's Pool is a local nature reserve, please see the tagged webpage. There are numerous County Council references to the nature reserve, none state as being a park. |
|
| 48575856 | BCNorwich | Hi, in the absence of a oneway tag it is implied that there is not a oneway restriction. Thus the oneway=no tag in (except in exceptional cases, please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway) is not actually needed. |
| PeppyPupper | Thanks again, should I add another changeset to revert the oneway changes? |
| BCNorwich | Hi, as you can see from the link the oneway tag is to be avoided unless it is needed to avoid other errors. It would actually do no harm if left. But best practice though would be to remove the oneway=no tags thus avoiding unnecessary bloat on the database. If you need any help please just ask. Re... |
|
| 48618656 | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Regarding the POI for a park you added, a POI is not really good for an area so I took the liberty of adding the area outline as best I could from Bing image. Secondly it's a private garden rather than a park, tags adjusted to suit garden. Regards |
|
| 48017837 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Firstly your new node/POI for the Nisa Local is placed on the street, (not very precise). Also there is a Budgens shop mapped as the nearest building. Has the Budgens store been replaced by Nisa? If so then it would be better to remove Budgens details and repla... |
| BCNorwich | No response so removed |
|
| 48602863 | BCNorwich | The larger area is encompassing yourpark area is already mapped as a recreation ground. Thus the park area (which actually looks like two football pitches) is incorrect. better to map the pitches. |
|
| 48575605 | BCNorwich | Hi you duplicated these bus stops. I've removed the duplicate checking that your shelter tag remains. |
| PeppyPupper | Thanks! I was using the StreetComplete app and was a bit suspicious when I had to fill in the same information twice (for each stop). Probably just some rough edges. |
|
| 48603858 | BCNorwich | Hi, the full common area is already mapped so I've removed the duplicate. |
|
| 48584503 | BCNorwich | Hi, the area was already mapped so I've removed the duplicate area. |
|
| 48574686 | BCNorwich | Please see board by entrance and websites for description of area, it is not a park, it is described as a playing field therefore recreation ground. |
|
| 48545383 | BCNorwich | Hello, I've removed your duplicated POI from street center (correctly placed POI inside building line to SSE). |
|
| 48503542 | BCNorwich | Removed fiction bench and rest areas fro middle of street and taxiway. |
|
| 48503016 | BCNorwich | Removed fiction bench and rest areas fro middle of street and taxiway. |
|
| 48498934 | Robert Whittaker | I think something's gone wrong with your edit here to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112289834/history -- should it just have been changed to landuse=farmland? |
| BCNorwich | Hi, sorry yes, slip up clicking the mouse. I thought I had found all of them. Extra tags now removed. Regards Bernard |
|
| 48498771 | BCNorwich | Hi, a way can be a track and a bridleway at the same time. |
| paul_plumz | I am sure it can, but it is classified as a bridleway on OS Maps and is not passable in a car from the Kettering Road to the top of Badsaddle woods |
| BCNorwich | Hi that's OK, then it can be tagged motorcar=no which means no public access by car, leaving general access as access=agricultural. |
| paul_plumz | OK - Sorry new at this, so if a bridleway is on a farm track then you classify it as a track with a designation as public_bridleway and set motorcar=no?Just trying to get all my local tacks onto OpenStreetMap |
| BCNorwich | Hi no cause to be sorry and please don't be put off by this. I'm still learning after several years.Yes to your question and because it's a farm track access=agricultural is very specific as to the allowed access. You can tag ways of any sort with specific access and or restrictions. By no means a... |
|
| 48494779 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.On it's own a name does not give any information to the public. So I've taken the liberty of adding to your POI.Regards Bernard |
|
| 48489431 | BCNorwich | Postcode presentation corrected |
|
| 48488363 | BCNorwich | There is a hotel at that address (to the south) but not in the middle of the river, unless you've booked a water bed and it's slipped its moorings. Anyway this node remove as obviously a mistake. |
|
| 48487311 | BCNorwich | Confusing with two different names. Can you confirm the change to Co Op Local? I've put a note on OSM asking for local confirmation of change. |
|
| 47292648 | Bunkys | Hi, Just trying to work out where the new wing of this hospital has gone and whether there was some problem with mapping (relatively new user)? Not sure how to track down changesets but yours seems to be the last edit? |
| BCNorwich | Hello, I made several minor alteration/tweaks to the building outline and somehow inadvertently removed that section. It is now reinstated, copied from a temporary reversion. If I remember correctly I think I was concerned about if that wing joined onto the main building (the east west section), I h... |
|
| 48463111 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.For the bridleway there is a discrepancies between what is mapped in OSM and what appears on the Ordnance survey map. I think an on the ground survey is required. Even if the definitive line cannot be used it is still a highway.For the gate again the same dis... |
| LessExciting | Thanks Bernard. In regards to the first change I haven't seen this on the ground but the connection between the bridleway and the track is visible on satellite so I'd thought I could extend it. The gate change I wasn't sure about. I've been on the ground there and the gate isn't really passable ... |
| BCNorwich | *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org |
|
| 48451974 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to point out that it is recommended to map the footway/sidewalk as a property of the street if the sidewalk is just attached with a kerb and not separated by a road verge or other barriers.Regards Bernard |
|
| 47778714 | trigpoint | Hi BernardNot sure if you looked through the history of this object but it was changed to a park, from a village green, by Doily17. I suspect this is pokemon related and should probably to put back?Cheers Phil |
| BCNorwich | Hello Phil, I actually only adjusted the outline to better reflect what I saw on the Bing image regarding the street car parking. A well known web site shows the area looking much like a park. I've searched the web and find that Corner Pin is the old name for a much larger area to the south now buil... |
|
| 48423459 | BCNorwich | The area can have landuse and leisure tags at the same time. |
|
| 48423384 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The area can have landuse and leisure tags at the same time. Do you know the name? |
|
| 48363075 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see the alteration you made to a section of the Jubilee Line is changing the layer from -3 to -5. I wonder how you came to this decision as the adjacent sections of the line remain at layer=-3, thus indicating a step of two layers? Regards Bernard |
|
| 48362401 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended the address and opening tags to suit OSM best practice. Regards Bernard |
|
| 48376017 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.If you are sure of the 20mph zone then the section between the two that you have amended also needs to be amended.My observation on the internet indicate that the 20mph zone is from a point about 80m south of Salhouse Road, to a point south of Lishman Road ro... |
| BCNorwich | Forgot to say if you need help/advice about splitting a road/way just ask. |
|
| 47778747 | tomhukins | The County Arms closed several years ago and was converted to flats. I haven't visited this area in a few months but I'd be very surprised if it has reopened. Can you confirm this is the case? |
| BCNorwich | Hello there, The pub is tagged disused=pub, (your tag of 2010). Then doily17 added back the tag amenity=pub on 13-4-17. I initially only re-positioned the node 14-4-17.I've now amended the tag amenity=pub to disused:amenity=pub. There should now be no confusion, disused stated twice.Regards ... |
| tomhukins | That makes sense, but I still don't understand why you would move a node when you seem unfamiliar with what's there. |
| tomhukins | Also I never recall Greene King operating the pub, and the Wikipedia tag seems irrelevant. I'll fix this. |
|
| 48367816 | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've tidied up the buildings and removed the fiction parks. |
|
| 48308755 | BCNorwich | Removed duplication of the street. What is the area, unless stated it is meaningless? |
|
| 48308434 | BCNorwich | Hello you made several duplicate ways of some of these footpaths, (either doubling back when drawing a way or actually drawing the new way on top of a section of already drawn way). I think I've removed all duplicates. Duplication thus fouls up routeing. Regards Bernard |
|
| 48338178 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think you got a bit awry with your first mapping. I've removed the address tags from Oak Drive and reverted it back to an unclassified highway, (it's not residential as you tagged it).Also I've added the address for Simonds onto the building outline so folk w... |
| Ben Patel | Hi, Thanks for the help and the amendment. |
|
| 48282474 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Mapped as they are your three premises are taken as being the whole building (top to bottom). It is more usual for this type of premises to be on the ground floor only. Thus one would tag the whole building with tags indicating the main purpose of the building, p... |
|
| 48285979 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your crossings are not done to OSM standard practice and as such do not make much sense. Please read up a bit on how to add data to OSM before making more additions. You could even look at how similar features have already been mapped.Your additions so far ... |
|
| 48088353 | BCNorwich | Hi, heck of a lot of self intersections on lots of these water way outlines, also some do not take account of existing water features (streams) or paths. Please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/m8h54pe |
|
| 48226194 | BCNorwich | Hello Rowland, just wanted to let you know that you've made a lot of self intersections to some of these building outlines. (Some joined at corners where they should be separated, others have outlines joined to courtyards.) Please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/kbkwt69 |
|
| 47679249 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think you have placed this node incorrectly. Guest house in middle of road, different street? Just ask if you need help. Regards |
| BCNorwich | No response so node removed |
|
| 48173003 | BCNorwich | Hello, There's no need to remove descriptive tags for areas when you make amendments. If the tag is still relevant please leave it. I've reinstated several tags you removed as they are still relevant.Regards Bernard |
|
| 48176273 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for your first additions to OSM. Just a couple of adjustments I've made.The node you moved from the road-side to the hall is actually a bus stop named Village Hall, I've moved it back. I've made several additions to the hall including address, website,... |
|
| 48164442 | BCNorwich | Hello there and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The circumference key is used to describe the circumference of a tree's trunk (if no unit is given metres are assumed,) at the height of 1 metre above ground. That makes your tree a giant!If it helps 110 inches = 2.8 metres.Regards Bernard |
| PMWheeler | Ah! Thanks I was working on assumption of cm. Wasn't immediately obvious what units circumference was in. |
|
| 48147282 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted (changed back to original state), your changeset, which added advertising and other fiction to an existing highway linked to several routes. You are welcomed to add your business to our live (best in the world) worldwide database but please take... |
| BCNorwich | Hi, I now see your company is in the USA. You made alterations to Ramsey Road in Dovercourt England. How could you get it so wrong? |
|
| 47795335 | BCNorwich | Hello, Just wanted to let you know that you've inadvertently placed "Way: Buildings (486821331)" on top of existing buildings, or something went wrong. Also that area way has self intersections to the outline. Regards |
| Norma_O'Connor | Hello, Thank U for your comment : ) Camden Fort Meagher is a Classical Costal Artillery Fortification dating form the 16th Century, currently a Tourist Attraction. I was trying to capture the changes, modifications and additions to the buildings and site throughout it's long history including the... |
|
| 48074951 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think you are mistaken with the guesthouse POI. Number 16 Hartley Ave is on the other side of the road and further north. Also I think East Ham (which is the area) is possibly not the proper name of the guest house.Could you please rectify this problem? Tha... |
|
| 48024799 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've remove the turning circle from the grass area. Would you like to position it again please. |
|
| 47847974 | BCNorwich | Made several amendments mainly to preserve/reinstate previous mapping. |
|
| 48010014 | BCNorwich | minor adjustments to conform |
|
| 47984936 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've taken the liberty to capitalise the names of the two areas you added. I've have removed the residential area you added because it was a duplicated area,(the whole of Littleport is mapped as landuse=residential), so this area was residential within resident... |
|
| 47887804 | BCNorwich | Removed sidewalk tag, sidewalk is a footway beside a highway. |
|
| 47916868 | BCNorwich | Tagged area as retail, remove building tag. |
|
| 47916528 | BCNorwich | Move common from joining to road, add pond to water feature, join path to road. |
|
| 47844498 | BCNorwich | Hi, it would be good to tell folk what type of shop it is, grocery, art maybe even electrical? |
| Mulanlaoshi | Great suggestion. Thanks. This was my first experience of Open Street Maps....didn't think anyone would notice : ) |
| BCNorwich | Hi, no problem and thanks for considering the advice.There's a lot of folk who would make mischief of something they can easily manipulate. Hence some OSMers glance at new folk editing and give advice when appropriate (or rectify mistakes). I've taken the liberty to amend your opening hours tag to... |
|
| 47844527 | BCNorwich | Removed the duplicate postbox |
|
| 47827723 | BCNorwich | Dallington Park is a recreation ground |
|
| 47881388 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for your addition to the OSM database. Unfortunately you were not aware that the original section of way could be separated and renamed. Placing a second way atop the original way inadvertently created a duplication of ways. I have separated that section o... |
| mdcambridge | Many thanks! (I had only one thing to edit!), but there is more: Fowler Way actually extends to the left and parallels Dobson Way. It is also inaccessible like parts of Dobson Way due to construction. I will try to find the name of the road running roughly N/S that parallels pychard, which is also u... |
|
| 47847032 | BCNorwich | Removed duplicate ways, amended lots of tags that did not properly describe the features, amended several area outlines, preserved previous mapping. |
|
| 47826849 | BCNorwich | Removed water tag it's on the relation. |
|
| 47837174 | BCNorwich | Hello There, can you say how you know this is a designated public footpath please. The way may well be used as a footpath but a "Designated Public Footpath" (Right of Way) carries a legal status which ought not be incorrectly stated. Regards |
| It's Matthew | The footpath signs are a good indication 😂 |
|
| 47808704 | tomhukins | Hi, thank you for improving OpenStreetMap. I notice you've added a "building=Lemonade_Building" tag to the Barclays branch. That's an unconventional value for the building tag: the commonly used values are listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building?uselang=en-GB |
| BCNorwich | Amended Barclays address |
| tomhukins | BCNorwich, it looks like you've removed the building tag altogether. I expect this is because it exists on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313501588 so I wonder if it makes sense to tag the address there. There's also https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4794857689 which repeats the building's nam... |
| BCNorwich | Hi, yes the building tag is there as building=apartments (18 levels), the bank is just one of those levels (level=0 is ground floor). The POI is needed if you want the building name to show in rendering (the building name in the banks tags is part of the address tagging, which is not rendered).I t... |
| BCNorwich | Second thoughts. The building name could go on the apartments outline as name=Lemonade Building which will be rendered. Thus the POI can be removed. |
|
| 47813749 | BCNorwich | Hello Welcome to OSM.If way 46858846 goes under or through building 416561610 the the section through the building should be a tunnel also wuth a layer tag. If you need help please just ask. |
| Tom Shorey | Hi BCNorwich, the building over hangs the way. Is that classed as a tunnel still? |
|
| 47755942 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. May the Pokémon be with you! |
| BCNorwich | But it's a recreation ground not a park! |
| chillly | It doesn't look like a rec. There's no sports pitches laid out on it. |
| BCNorwich | Hi, it's an area for informal recreation on foot, there do not have to be pitches. |
| chillly | No, in English it is a piece of public land used for sports and games. The tagged space is a piece of rough ground that could not support sports and games. That may be a park, I suspect it is just grassland, it's certainly doesn't look well kept for a park. |
|
| 47755554 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've reverted this area back to a college. Also remove the tag "park" from the college grounds. |
|
| 47770441 | BCNorwich | Hello I've removed landuse=retail tag from the building as it is already on the outer land area outline. |
|
| 47752479 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This is a formal "playing field" so a recreation ground/area, there is no formal park here. Regards |
|
| 47748933 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Are these two points on the track really entrances to Nine Wells and are they really properly named as "Western entrance to Nine Wells LNR/LGS" and "Eastern entrance to Nine Wells LNR/LGS"?In any case the OSM database cannot render informa... |
|
| 47743627 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detailYou seem to be a bit tangled in relations that you really don't need. Do you need any help sorting this out? |
| stujames | Hi, how do you mean tangled? We can lose the point if it's overkill. I'm just trying to get my block onto as many maps as possible as it isn't showing up in various databases. |
| chillly | I commented on the wrong changeset, but taking the four together: The last one looks fine, the first and third use a relation to draw two parts of the building that is not needed to be a relation. The building outline could be drawn in one piece then the names, address details etc added to the outli... |
| chillly | sorry, *without* the separate point |
| BCNorwich | Hello sorry if I've blundered in. I corrected Dixie Court from the first changeset before seeing these comments. Regards Bernard |
|
| 47648642 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've placed your POI info on the already mapped outline of the park. |
| simontaylor66 | Thank youIs there any way to get someone to change these? It's great that someone has updated the map to include the new development, but the orientation of the development is just slightly off. For Example Drury Avenue actually runs parallel to the busway, with Pychard Road still at 90 degree t... |
| BCNorwich | Hi, I'm afraid that is about as good as can be expected for the time being, unless someone local does a proper survey of the area. There is as yet no aerial imagery that can be copied and there are no GPS tracks uploaded. If you can make a good plan I'd willingly trace it to OSM. Regards Bernard |
|
| 47639622 | BCNorwich | POI already mapped so removed this duplicate. Also added website. |
|
| 47510714 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've taken the liberty of adjusting the address, correcting the postcode O to 0, changing the format of the opening hours to suit OSM convention, adding a website. Hope that helps Regards Bernard |
|
| 47488468 | BCNorwich | I made changes to your opening hours and expanded church St to saint |
|
| 47431823 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I amended your tags for name, opening-hours and description to conform to OSM best practice. Regards |
|
| 47021093 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.You've placed this POI on the roadside by a little park, likely inadvertently incorrect. Features uploaded to OSM must be verifiable on the ground. It would be good if you could look at this positioning again. Or could you give more details of the florist, name,... |
| BCNorwich | No response so POI is removed. |
| mapping man | Hi BCNorwich. Just to let you know that there is a small public garden in that POI location. It is paved with an ornamental shrubbery in the centre and benches in a circular pattern on the outside. I think Jonathon must have used the wrong POI. |
|
| 47413912 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.With respect I have reverted your change-set as this area is predominantly trees thus woodland. Although the grass and wooded areas of the campus are used as recreation or parkland there is no formal park here, (with the exception of Earlham Park). |
|
| 47240355 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've redrawn your grass areas that were over roads and self intersecting. |
|
| 47261455 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately you introduced a duplicate way with this addition by placing it atop the existing highway. I have removed the duplicate wayRegards. |
|
| 47227212 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately you placed the new pedestrian highway on top of and along several trunk roads. Making in effect a duplicated way. Thus I have reverted (removed ) the new pedestrian way.If it was your intention to mark up a map for running/walking then OSM is n... |
|
| 47203636 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This is a Public Right of Way please don't delete any of it. It may be inaccessible to vehicles, that does not matter. |
| Epping Forest Taxi | Nobody is asking for it to be deleted, just for it to be marked as a pedestrian path; not normally accessible for vehicles. |
| BCNorwich | OK, you had actually deleted the northern section, I now realise this must have been an inadvertent action which I've rectfied. The history of the change is still intact if you wish to view it. |
|
| 47202771 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.A board walk needs to be tagged with bridge=boardwalk for it to be correctly represented. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3DboardwalkRegards |
|
| 47202543 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.A board walk needs to be tagged with bridge=boardwalk for it to be correctly represented. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3DboardwalkRegards |
|
| 47199257 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reversed the change to the hotel as the relation area was already in the database, (with the inner cutout (courtyard) of the building). |
|
| 47165477 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You have inadvertently placed your new space 'park' in the middle of a road which is obviously incorrect. I cannot see any place around here that could accommodate a new park so I've removed the POI.If I can help in any way to locate the park please just as... |
|
| 47079055 | BCNorwich | Hi, there are now several area named "Kidbrooke Village". I doubt if this large area is one apartment build, rather it could be several buildings. From the quoted website "Kidbrooke Village" is a name given to the whole area.Regards Bernard |
|
| 47078989 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to point out a couple of things.I wonder if "Sutcliffe Park Walkway" is a proper name given to all of the footpaths and if this is verifiable on the ground? (Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability).Secondly the... |
|
| 47065049 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended the opening hours tagging to suit that required by OSM, removed your description tag as that's really blatant advertising and is on your tagged website anyway.That leaves the following two problems that you need to address :-payment:credit_card... |
|
| 47058409 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.So is that now a single building all with the address that was/is on the original part of the building? If so then the two building areas should be merged into one single area with the address. I could do this if you wish. Regards |
|
| 47037529 | BCNorwich | Hi, if the road is closed that would not make its name Road Closed, so I've removed the name tag. |
|
| 47027729 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. The info in the fire station POI you added is already contained on the amenity=fire_station area outline. I've removed the extraneous POI which no extra data.Regards |
|
| 46707983 | BCNorwich | Hello There, I think you have accidentally made a circle of Sandon Green park. If you need help altering it please just ask |
| BCNorwich | No response so I've adjusted park outline to bing. |
|
| 46851565 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately an addition in this manner is of no use to anyone including yourself, it just won't show on any map. If you draw your house outline, tag it as building=house (maybe add the address) that will be able to be rendered on a map. Otherwise this node ough... |
| Terry Stapleton | I'm new to this please delete node asap |
| BCNorwich | Hi thanks for responding, the node is deleted. Please just ask if you want any help.Regards |
|
| 46826236 | BCNorwich | Removed fiction |
|
| 46824297 | BCNorwich | More details and better positioning would help. |
|
| 46827302 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your changeset because all the tourism=attraction features you added are already mapped, (the tags are on the actual features). By the way you had made several spelling and capitalisation mistakes.Regards |
|
| 46774788 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Our aim is the best map possible, we strive to help new mappers understand best practices learnt from years of experience. Please take these comments as trying to help not hinder.In deleting the park and drawing it again you have removed the mapping history o... |
|
| 46758489 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The land this building is on already has a landuse=residential tag therefore the building does not need a landuse tag at all. I have changed the building tag from building=yes to building=residential. If/when the building is mapped as separate dwellings each can ... |
| Qafir | Thank you. I'll keep this in mind for all further edits. |
|
| 46756210 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Features mapped to OSM must be verifiable on the ground (the whole idea of a map is to guide one to a place/feature on the ground).I cannot ascertain a proper address for your company, (it is not in the middle of Barbel Street), so I have removed the POI. If ... |
|
| 46738791 | BCNorwich | This is a park, your fiction is removed. Please don't mess up a live worldwide map. It spoils it for everyone including yourself. Thanks! |
|
| 46737943 | BCNorwich | Are you sure that is a hotel, or is it just a room rental?? |
| trigpoint | Airbnb are private homes and have no place in OSM, I am reverting this |
|
| 46733121 | BCNorwich | I tagged it as building=house now it will show. |
|
| 46722984 | BCNorwich | Dubious name removed and pool outline corrected. |
|
| 46722934 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed the fiction name. Is this really in your front garden or down the road a bit? |
|
| 46721201 | BCNorwich | Hello could you give an indication as to the memorial dedication please? Is it for the Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Hospital? If so the site of the hospital building is on the corner of Church Way and Euston Road and maybe the POI is not exactly placed. |
|
| 46721126 | BCNorwich | Info on these nodes already exists on the park area outlines. So nodes removed as its unnecessary duplication. |
|
| 46721054 | BCNorwich | Info on this node already exists on the park area outline. So node removed as its unnecessary duplication. |
|
| 46720913 | BCNorwich | Info for park name placed on already mapped park outline area. |
|
| 46720848 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have removed your new POI for the church as the church is already mapped in its correct location south of here. Regards |
|
| 46708099 | BCNorwich | Hello, The Horse & Groom POI was close by, I've properly positioned it.The area you mapped you tagged as a lake and it was a circle shape, obviously incorrect so I've removed it. If you need help please just ask.Regards |
|
| 46708057 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've positioned the church POI to over the church building according to the Bing image. Regards |
|
| 46715794 | BCNorwich | The park was already mapped, I've added your new surface tag (grass) to the existing feature. Regards |
|
| 46714252 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your changeset because it joined up service roads, an existing area and a new area into (linking linear and area features into one feature).If you can explain what you are trying to do maybe I could help?Regards. |
|
| 46705682 | BCNorwich | Hello, your restaurant was wrongly placed. I've put a POI with your data at roughly 62 Marine Parade and reinstated the crossing that was altered at your original position. Regards |
|
| 46241375 | BCNorwich | The park you have added is over a residential area. If the park is fictitious then it should be removed, (only on the ground verifiable features ought be added to OSM). If it is fiction would you therefore please remove it? Or shall I remove it?Regards |
| BCNorwich | No response so park mapped on top of housing is removed. |
|
| 46630784 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to let you know that in the absence of a oneway tag OSM presumes that the is way is twoway, thus under most circumstances there not a need to tag oneway=no OSM presumes it for you.Having said that your tagging is not in fact incorrect, just unne... |
|
| 46196626 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI'm not really sure what you were trying to do here. You have created an area, given it a name that looks like a road name and added something that looks like a postcode that can't apply to the whole area.I wonder if you were experimenting and didn't mean to save this to the li... |
| BCNorwich | No response so fiction removed. |
|
| 46181961 | BCNorwich | This feature House of Abderahman is in the garden behind Foulden Road. There is not to my knowledge a hotel on Foulden Road. I suspect this is probably where you or your friend resides. You could map the house where you live, that would be OK. But this fiction should be removed. |
| BCNorwich | Fiction removed |
|
| 46181872 | BCNorwich | This feature House of Yousef is not placed on Jade Close. There is not to my knowledge a hotel on either Jade Close nor Marble Drive. I suspect this is probably where you reside. You could map the house where you live, that would be OK. But this fiction should be removed. |
| BCNorwich | I have removed the fiction. |
|
| 46046134 | BCNorwich | Hello, Just wanted to let you know that a section of Sandy Park Road (amended/altered in this your recent changeset) is now duplicated. There are different route relations on each part of the duplication so it needs knowledge of these to make a repair.Regards |
|
| 46489273 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap, your fictions have been removed. Please be aware that your uploads are spoiling the best map in the world. That means you are spoiling it for yourself as well.You've shown you are a good mapper so genuine additions to OSM will be appreciated.Regards |
|
| 46439854 | Derick Rethans | Hi!And welcome to OpenStreetMap. I think you might have double drawn the road now. Would you like me to correct this? What was your intention with this change? did the road change?cheers,Derick |
| BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You've actually added 4 new untagged ways each duplicating the route of Grierson Road. So I have reverted this changeset to avoid any problems of someone trying to undo mistakes.Regards |
|
| 46362170 | BCNorwich | Hell, I removed way 453122534 as it duplicates part of way 476898369, it also had self intersection of the outline. |
|
| 46402474 | BCNorwich | Hello There, and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I removed your tag lanes=-2 from Hampden Way as it is meaning less, (-2 lanes is less than 1 lane, less than 1 lane is no road at all).Regards |
|
| 46379076 | BCNorwich | Hello, I noticed you changed the name of this bus stop. This POI is a bus stop not a telephone box.If your intention is to map a defibrillator then you have not done so. The phone box is not mapped, please add it as a separate POI. If it is now defibrillator position please properly map it as such... |
|
| 46313945 | BCNorwich | Hi, hasn't the pub now been demolished, (as reported on some websites)? |
| ChrisBarr | Ah, yes you're right. Should the building be deleted? (Sorry, first time contributor to OSM) |
| BCNorwich | Hi, no problem. welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've added a demolished:amenity=pub tag removed the other tags but kept your note. Like this anyone thinking the pub has been accidentally deleted can see the shape and reason for removal of the amenity. When the new construction is done perhaps you could... |
| ChrisBarr | I see, that makes sense. Yes will do. Thanks! |
|
| 46288551 | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to osm. Something has gone a little wrong here, the building you have created is rather large and covers several streets. Would you like some help fixing it? |
| BCNorwich | Hello yes welcome.Your next changeset made incorrect alterations so I've reverted both changeset as both have problems.I researched your company and have added a POI at the building mapped as 46 Loman Street. Please check this out and adjust as necessary.RegardsBernard |
|
| 46289115 | BCNorwich | Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your addition of an un-described area as it makes major alterations to mapped rail lines dragging them out of place. There are many help pages to get you started mapping. If you need help adding features to OSM please just ask. |
|
| 46274195 | BCNorwich | Does this site exist? I can find no reference to it! |
|
| 46241321 | BCNorwich | Hello There,You've mapped the park over two buildings. Have the buildings been demolished? If so the buildings should be removed or tagged as demolished.Regards |
|
| 46226765 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have removed your POI as it is already mapped. I have added your tourism=attraction tag to the existing POI as it was missing and may have led to your addition.Regards Bernard |
|
| 46187300 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I wonder if the guest house is really called "HOME" and if it is actually situated on the corner of a street. Could you please better place the POI and possibly correct the name? |
|
| 46102466 | BCNorwich | Hello There, I reverted the name change from your destination/origin information because Lea Valley Lines is the name not Enfield - Liverpool Street Line.The destination and origin information is already contained in the route relation.Regards Bernard |
|
| 45595862 | BCNorwich | Revert Fiction |
|
| 45596602 | BCNorwich | Reverted fiction |
|
| 45445050 | BCNorwich | Hello There, i think something went wrong with Jennings Pool by the looks of it. Can I help? Can it be removed?regards Bernard |
|
| 45768427 | BCNorwich | Inadvertent un-tagged mapping removed. Added back wood area to your park, the area can have two or more descriptive tags. |
|
| 46074135 | BCNorwich | Hello, you haven't actually deleted the building or park, you've just removed some tags to them. |
|
| 46058248 | BCNorwich | Hello There, As the areas are mapped the name Perivale Wood Local Nature Reserve appears three times on three areas. Do you think that, as the two meadows are mapped as within the Perivale Wood Local Nature Reserve, they might just have their individual meadow names. Thus avoiding repetition. Re... |
|
| 46043903 | BCNorwich | Hello and thanks for joining the two paths. I had alerted the new mapper to the problem with a comment on his changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46028966#map=19/52.63163/1.31219). He responded but due to your quick correction was not able to see un-joined ways. If you notice a newb... |
|
| 46028966 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The two footways are not joined to each other. Could you verify or not that there is a continuous way through on the footpath from Gas Hill to St Leonard's Road? If so then the two paths should be joined.Regards Bernard |
| Andy South | Thankyou Bernard, Yes there is a continuous way through. I just looked on the map and it seemed to me that the lines for St Leonards and St Michaels terraces are joined. But I'm new to this so please do correct if not. Thanks. Andy |
| BCNorwich | Hello Andy, The problem was fixed yesterday by mapper dmgroom_ct so you were unable to see the un-joined ways.No problem now and thanks for your additions. If I can help in any way please just ask.Regards Bernard |
|
| 45251608 | BCNorwich | Hello, I just wanted to let you know that you are, probably inadvertently, making a lot of self intersection on the various types of areas you map. |
| BCNorwich | Also a field or fields tagged show the land usage is better described as landuse=farmland.To tag an area landuse=farm is really describing the area as a place (a farm in OSM is usually a place). |
| SK53 | @BCNorwich: this latter statement is incorrect. landuse=farm predates use of landuse=farmland but got used for farmyards. It was therefore decided that a clearer distinction was needed, hence farmland and farmyard. place=farm is something different and should largely be avoided in most parts of Brit... |
| Dyserth | Hi BCNorwich - I'm not sure what you mean by self intersection but I presume its where a way goes back on itself. I have no idea how you can find out which ways have this error either so am unable to check and correct them. As you can find them have you any hints?Some areas around this region had ... |
| SK53 | Hi Dyserth,This tool is a good place to start (I've selected only the intersecting polygon option & pointed it N Wales): http://product.itoworld.com/map/109?lon=-0.17309&lat=51.53694&zoom=13.I wrote something about these issues a long time ago, but it might still be useful as an ... |
| BCNorwich | https://tinyurl.com/j9qlv2bHello Dyserth, the above link show the geometry layer of problems in OSM mapping including area intersecting points. There are several views that can be selected giving many layers of differing problems.Yes self intersections are where an area outline doubles back on i... |
|
| 45946299 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. IMHO one ought not to assume speed limits, it's really just guessing. Would it be possible to go there and properly survey the roads. |
| BCNorwich | Oh and the foot-way, are cycles allowed there? Also the foot-way is not joined to the roads at each end so software will not be able to route along it.Regards |
| markf0wle | I live on this road. The speed limit isn't sign posted on the estate, my assumption was my interpretation of the highway code. I will double check & correct if nessecary.I will amend the footpath. Yes, bicycles are permitted on all the footpaths in the area to my knowledge. |
| trigpoint | You have tagged Welling Road as lanes=1, is that true? It doesn't look like a single track road on bing imagery.Also 20mph areas cannot exist without signs. |
| markf0wle | OK, good shout. I have corrected the lanes on Welling Rd, is 2 lanes - 1 in each direction.I have too found this reviewing the highway code, therefore the official speed limit would be 30mph as that is the last posted speed as you enter Welling Road from Brentwood Road. |
| BCNorwich | Would you then correct the speed limits on the estate please? It would be wrong for OSM, (the best map in the world), to knowingly contain wrong data.Regards |
| markf0wle | Done Sir. |
|
| 45997812 | BCNorwich | Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I really don't know how you came to map your POI so far away from Raleigh. You actually changed the address of a building mapped in Dagenham, London, UK.I have reverted the change so no harm is done here. If I can help in any way please just ask. Good luc... |
|
| 45977055 | BCNorwich | Pointless POI from maps me removed |
|
| 45965014 | BCNorwich | Hello Dreamer. This POI "Buckingham Palace" is actually along way from the Palace.The Palace is already tagged as tourism so no extra tag is needed there, would you please then remove inadvertent POI?Your POI "Greenwich" is not needed either as the place is already mapped, ... |
| trigpoint | Hi Brian, I have reverted both of these changsets,Maps.me users are very unlikely to respond and maps.me is not capable of changing or removing anything. |
|
| 45970973 | BCNorwich | Hello Dreamer. This POI "Westminster Abbey" is actually along way from the Abbey.The Abbey is already tagged as tourism so no extra tag is needed there, would you please then remove inadvertent POI? |
|
| 45941061 | SomeoneElse | Hi Bernard,Did you even look at the underlying features that you made changes to here?The way that you have edited https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151615229/history started out as a wood (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/lNO ) and was changed to a duplicate park by a Pokemon mapper in https:... |
| BCNorwich | I have reverted the changeset. My apologies for not having any idea what you were doing. |
|
| 45924084 | BCNorwich | Hello There, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It is the usual practice, if a building is single occupancy (serves a single purpose/company), to place the address information on the building outline. This practice can be seen/noted in several of the nearby mapped buildings. I see you've done several te... |
| FreddyMills | Hi, yeah sorry about this basically I'm trying to use MapBox to do geocoding requests on points I add via the OSM API, but they don't seem to appear immediately in their maps. I was just leaving a point somewhere I thought wouldn't cause problems overnight to see how long it takes them to pick up ne... |
|
| 45855040 | BCNorwich | Reverted you additions as they duplicated themselves, duplicated existing mapped ways and were drawn across houses.Please just ask if you need help adding something to OpenStreetMap. We're always willing to help new mappers improve the live worldwide map rather than corrupt it. |
|
| 45835914 | DaveF | Why have you deleted the building? |
| BCNorwich | I beg your pardon my mistake. There was a duplicate node on the entrance. When I inspected it I saw the two outlines and deleted one of them. After your prompt and closer inspection I found the duplicate node. Building now restored and extra node removed. |
| DaveF | Thanks |
|
| 45772472 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your change of the two bus stop names is incorrect but understandable. The names are taken from the National Public Transport Access Node (NaPTAN) database. These names are the official designated names and are not necessarily what local folk might call the bus s... |
| A1map | OK Bernard, understood. Thanks for letting me know.Regards Martin |
|
| 45592080 | BCNorwich | You are very welcome to add features to OpenStreetMap but they must be genuine. Anything else is looked on as vandalism and would be to your detriment should you ever have need to use an OSM map.Your obvious fiction has been removed. |
|
| 45702273 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I noticed you've had several attempts at placing feature on the map. This has resulted in one untagged node being uploaded to the OSM database. As it is this has no value and should be removed. If you would like help mapping something please just ask, otherwise... |
|
| 45697236 | BCNorwich | Removed duplicate paths, removed path names, minor adjustments |
|
| 45697115 | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.We try to map things accurately as they exist in the real world This and many of your other additions appear to be doodles, this one is on top of a road. |
| BCNorwich | Removed duplicated way. |
|
| 45696964 | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Please take time to understand the best way to properly add paths to OSM. I've looked at all in this changeset and lots are duplication's, others illogical. In order to protect the integrity of the map, (used by folk all over the world) I've removed some obviously w... |
|
| 45544213 | BCNorwich | Hi, thanks for adding these two POI but the information was already placed on the buildings. Duplicate POI info removed. |
|
| 45531000 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed the three parks because they are mapped within an existing park. Regards |
|
| 45530322 | BCNorwich | Hi, the area tagged as wood is an area within the area tagged as park. Your change tagged the woods to park within a park. I've changed the tagging back to the original.Regards. |
|
| 45488067 | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap."Name=resident area" on a node does not mean anything to the database. If you want to indicate that the building is residential within that predominately retail area then you could change the tag building=yes to building=residential.Need any help please ... |
|
| 45487934 | BCNorwich | Hi the park you added was obviously a mistake as it was placed on top of a residential area, so I've removed it. Regards |
|
| 45594978 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have changed something named as Compton Terrace Gardens from being tagged as a garden to a park. Is this really true, or are you changing things to attract Pokémon? We want your edits but please add real stuff in the right place and described properly. |
| Romulus_Tiberius | I don't play pokemon. But English is also not my first language, and after just googling the difference between park and garden I tend to think that is more of a park then a garden. There's nowhere near enough plants or flowering plants to make it a garden, but at the same time maybe it's not big en... |
| chillly | OK, I accept your choice. We are seeing lots of new mappers simply adding parks to play a game, that's why I asked. I hope you find more detail to add in your area. |
| BCNorwich | Hello Compton Terrace Gardens are actually gardens, they happen to be used like a park. That's why they are called and signed as gardens. Originally they were for the private use of people living in the terrace's, please see :- http://www.londongardensonline.org.uk/gardens-online-record.asp?ID=ISL02... |
|
| 45578980 | BCNorwich | Welcome to OpenStreetMap a live worldwide database that ordinary folk contribute to in order to make the best maps possible. Please don't add fiction for your games to the live map. There are ways that you can use OSM to make maps of your desire but what you've done here is incorrect. Thus your addi... |
|
| 45579014 | BCNorwich | Welcome to OpenStreetMap a live worldwide database that ordinary folk contribute to in order to make the best maps possible. Please don't add fiction for your games to the live map. There are ways that you can use OSM to make maps of your desire but what you've done here is incorrect. Thus your addi... |
|
| 45576453 | BCNorwich | Adjustments to area, add/amend service and foot access, remove unnecessary tags, remove POI |
|
| 45529446 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This footway is already mapped in that the existing cycleway is designated as segregated foot and cycle use. So I have removed the duplication.Regards Bernard |
| mjs317 | Thank you Bernard. Put that down to over exuberance of a new user! |
| BCNorwich | No problem, need any help just ask! |
|
| 45568757 | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. I assume this footpath is meant to connect to Wellbeck Drive? For it to be usable it does need to connect. Shout up if you need a hand. |
| BCNorwich | I don't think there is a footpath goes through the houses just there. |
|
| 45555196 | BCNorwich | All change-sets to and including this one are reverted to remove fiction. |
|
| 45549791 | BCNorwich | Not the proper place to do testing (testing can be done without uploading fiction to the live database). Can I help you with mapping anything.Your addition has been removed.Regards |
|
| 45536044 | BCNorwich | Your silly fiction has been removed. If you need help adding genuine features to OSM please just ask. |
|
| 45511082 | BCNorwich | Removed residential area as it was mapped inside of a residential area, duplication. |
|
| 45538138 | BCNorwich | Removed paths drawn over established housing. |
|
| 45530532 | BCNorwich | I have reverted these silly changes.You show you have a good idea how to map map properly, this is the best map in the world please don't spoil it. And we would welcome some real additions to help us and your good selfRegardsBernard |
|
| 45530180 | BCNorwich | It's an informal path through the woods not a of the status you tagged it. The house is not a park. The gardens are not a park. Tagging reversed/removed. |
|
| 45530105 | BCNorwich | This is actually a service road maintained by the council. Giving vehicle access to properties along it as well as access on foot. |
|
| 45514445 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.You seem to have deleted stuff and and added junk to the map. If you are trying to attract Pokémon, you are wasting your time. They only use certified parks, paths and waterways.Imaginary ones are a waste of time.I will delete this as junk. |
| jm350z | I accidentally deleted the funeral home. As far as junk is concerned, i tried to add waveney water garden, this was a japanese garden with many koi ponds created by my late father in law. There are still original ponds and fish at the properties. Your reference to junk is very harsh and quite frankl... |
| chillly | Hmmm, what about the five houses on a private road you plonked the pond onto?I stand by junk. |
| jm350z | "ponds" at the properties. Go fuck yourself |
| lostmike | Map each pond separately. |
| chillly | Thank you for reinforcing my initial idea. I have checked, the area covered all of the houses and gardens and even touched the main road. Maybe there were ponds there in years past, but the aerial images show only houses and gardens with lawns now. If you want to map real stuff that is present n... |
| BCNorwich | Supporting chilly's decision and calm response. |
|
| 45451341 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIs that really a park or are you just trying to attract Pokémon? The park (garden) overlaps the building. please add stuff carefully and only add real stuff. |
| BCNorwich | Removed fictional park placed atop existing buildings and private parking area. |
|
| 45451551 | BCNorwich | Removed fictional park placed atop existing buildings. |
|
| 45451736 | BCNorwich | Adding made up places is not very helpful to a live worldwide database. Your changes are reverted. Even so Welcome to OpenStreetMap and if I can help you make a positive contribution please just ask.Regards Bernard |
|
| 45466308 | BCNorwich | With respect I think you will find that under the tree cover is a large area of water. If you haven't actually been there then please look at other maps and aerial imagery.Regards Bernard |
| teebox | Dear Bernard,Thank you for your comment. I do in fact live in Long Melford and frequent the Valley Trail and park regularly. Whilst I agree that there is a large body of water in the woodland area, i believe the proportions both on OSM and Google maps are inaccurate. It appears substantially lar... |
|
| 45437305 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This area is actually part of Clapham Common and has been mapped as such for many years. |
|
| 45425774 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The information contained on your two added POI (museum) is already included in full description's of each of the buildings. I have removed your two POI as it is a duplication of data.Regards |
|
| 45387700 | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You've placed that unnamed bank on a residential street. I don't think there's a bank close by so I'll remove the POI.If you can give more details and a better position please please make the addition and if I can help please just ask. |
|
| 45377360 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've adjusted your new mapped path (separated it from the wood area outline), joined it to the crossing ways and extended it west a little to join a track (seen in the Bing image).The width measurement used in OSM is metric, did you really mean the path is 10 m... |
| WorldsBoss | Thank you for the kind welcome Bernard. I did notice that the measurement was in meters, but there was method in my madness haha. Although the main footpath is on the top half of the clearing where I drew the footpath, it does technically span the entire clearing. There is grass everywhere else unti... |
|
| 45212412 | BCNorwich | Made several adjustments to paths, joined several to roads. |
|
| 45217772 | BCNorwich | Joined several ways to roads. made many adjustments to paths. |
|
| 45322529 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've had a close look at the ways you've recently added to the database.I removed several bridleways as they were duplication's of existing ways and are not bridleways in their own right. I re-tagged highways where appropriate to include bridle status. I joined up an... |
| BCNorwich | Way: 467433785 can you really walk that line and does it join the road at north? |
| telmocosta | Yes you can walk 467433785 and it joins the road at north. although i haven't crossed that path yet. Thanks for your help, I have laid down plenty of path for my walk, I am not experienced in drawing footpaths. |
|
| 44952041 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.There are problems with this footpath. You've not connected it to the road at south, it's drawn across a house into back gardens. Would you please look at and correct it? Need any help just ask. I can remove it for you if it's not repairable? |
| BCNorwich | No response, no evidence so removed way. |
|
| 44953859 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Well I'm sorry to say that addition has gone wrong. The footpath in part duplicates Mercator Road, then cuts twice across a building. Would you like to have a look and make corrections? If you need help please just ask, I'll await your response. If no response I'... |
| BCNorwich | No response so path removed. There are several footpaths around these buildings that could be added but a proper survey is needed. |
|
| 45105496 | BCNorwich | removed fiction |
|
| 45292894 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This hotel just doesn't look right. Unnamed and sitting in the middle of a street. Can you give more details and position please. If I can help please just ask. Regards |
| SDavies | I think I do recall seeing a hotel near here-- but at the Chingford Rd end of the street. I'll likely survey this area soon-ish so will check then. |
|
| 45084589 | BCNorwich | Hello there Sam888.Quite a few problems with the features you recently added. Would you like to have a look and maybe make adjustments, please see here :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-0.94274&lat=53.24077&zoom=13&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersecti... |
| BCNorwich | Two areas tagged as grass that are actually 90, 95% not grass but highway surface, are removed. Grass area was a narrow verge. Each area was also mapped with self intersection.One area remapped to remove self intersection of area outline, create areas without any self intersection, now mapped pr... |
| SomeoneElse | Based on the last time I was in the area (last year) I don't think there's anything like this amount of "meadow" here. You could maybe make a claim for the bit by the cricket pitch, but it'd be a stretch. |
| SomeoneElse | This was so wrong based on my recollection of the area that I've reverted it (but also tried to incorporate future changes that seemed plausible, e.g. that the main street in Milton is lit). |
|
| 44846651 | BCNorwich | There are still many problems with your mapping. Now I see gates mapped as linear features. A gate is an impediment/barrier to a way, not a way it's self. The tag barrier=gate should be placed on a single node of either a barrier or highway, or an intersection of a barrier and a highway, please see ... |
| BCNorwich | Problems now rectified |
|
| 44826418 | chillly | Hi,If the area around a property is a garden, you can (should) tag it as a garden, not a meadow. The key is leisure:garden. Only add names that are shown on signs, so a garden will not have a name:Garden tag. It takes a while to get the hang of things, but you're getting there. |
| chillly | There is landuse:orchard available if you're sure the site is an orchard, again that stops you misusing the name tag. |
| BCNorwich | All problems now rectified. |
|
| 44818791 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM is a live worldwide database from which folk compile maps. It is imperative that the data we add is correct, factual and verifiable on the ground.You show good skills in adding features to the database. But with the exception of the two buildings it looks l... |
| BCNorwich | I think all problems on this changeset now rectified, thanks |
|
| 45201297 | BCNorwich | The number suggests a triangulation pillar then type=triangulation can be added. Please see here :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_pointRegards |
| Peter Fowler | Sure.I am very, very new here, and I read the paragraph,> type=triangulation, > type=observation_spot,> type=fixed_point and type=benchmark > have meaning in nautical maps, where > they refer to INT-1 codes B20, B21, B22 > and B23 respectively. Note: it would be \... |
| SomeoneElse | "type=triangulation" was a new one to me too... |
| SK53 | type=* anything should be avoided as type really should be reserved for relations. I would agree with either of survey_point or survey_point:type as being suitable values. |
| Peter Fowler | Please believe me that I had no notion how difficult I would find this. Please feel invited to fill in the correct tags perhaps from http://trigpointing.uk/trig/3033 . Further, I am not quite certain that the [wiki page that I used](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_point) is... |
| Peter Fowler | I have found, on my shelves, a paper copy of sheet 122 of the Seventh Series (Melton Mowbray) published 1962. Looking at SK865065, it is between the 500 foot and 450 foot contour line, I would judge at about 470 feet, maybe a little higher. Should I add this figure, or the one from the Garmin (149 m... |
| SK53 | Not to worry: somewhat surprisingly trig pillars are not that well documented. This discussion is useful for helping clarify what should be documented. By a remarkable co-incidence last weekend I also mapped a trig pillar featured on sheet 122 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4608321916), so it's ... |
| Peter Fowler | OK. My map does not appear to have the spot height. The green Pathfinder 896 has metric contours and a spot height of 150 and the Orange Explorer 15 is identical. My only concern is to avoid being accused of wrongful copying of the issued data from [TrigpointingUK](http://trigpointing.uk/trig/3033) ... |
| SK53 | My map is issue B/* (c) 1962, updated with PRoW and major roads 1967. I notice the map on NLS doesnt have the spot height either, and the earlier interpolated contours on the 6" and 2.5 inch OOC maps dont really agree with the spot height (http://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17&lat=52.6502... |
| Peter Fowler | Thank you.I have never previously seen that map, and I agree that the land rises quite steeply from the Uppingham Road. This triangulation pillar does not seem to be shown. Had it been erected? The OS claim that their "leveling" dates from 1963. Perhaps the contour lines on the 1937-61... |
|
| 45200252 | BCNorwich | I'm sorry but I don't think that the playing field nor the football pitch is named "Briston pavillion". The clubhouse building east of the field might be. |
| BCNorwich | Please don't let the comments on your first OSM mapping deter you, everyone makes mistakes (especially me). There is a lot to learn and there's lots of help on the web. If you think I can help please just ask. |
|
| 45199972 | chillly | Welcome to OSM,Thanks for the detail. We normally add a name tag when there is a sign naming something. Public Footpath is a useful sign but we add a special tag designation=public_footpath. |
| BCNorwich | Yes Welcome, what you've actually added is a duplication of an existing way. It's been on the OSM database for several years and is on the Vespucci map. As such it adds nothing extra to the database (except for several of your new descriptions, which I might argue about), thus it ought to be removed... |
|
| 45176935 | BCNorwich | This bus-stop is mapped actually some distance from the street and there is another bus-stop close by on that street. The name=studio given to the bus_stop looks suspicious as well, especially as the close by building is Studio College. So it looks like your mapping is somewhat flawed. Please re... |
|
| 45171756 | chillly | Hi Welcome to OSM,You seem to have added a footpath which meanders across a roundabout and a road. Did you mean to save this for everyone to see of were you practicing? Do you need any help with this? |
| BCNorwich | Yes welcome, I started to rectify the problems on some of the sections of path modified/added at the north of this changeset. Unfortunately I think the rest is better/easier if removed and started again. Then as they are pavements by the road separated by a kerb it could be better to map them as sid... |
|
| 45075120 | BCNorwich | Is there a physical, verifiable feature on the ground here with a verifiable name? If not then the point ought not be mapped as it serves no function. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/VerifiabilityRegards |
| hadw | The other issue here is that names should not be used to carry meta-data. |
| BCNorwich | No response from mapper so changeset reverted. |
|
| 45156201 | BCNorwich | Hello There, OpenStreetMap is a live worldwide database from which folk compile maps. To include fiction in this database could cause disruption. You added a name to a residential area which looks highly suspicious so I have reverted the changes.If you can show the name is verifiable on the ground... |
| BCNorwich | WARNING the link to GoaLoo may not be safe. |
|
| 45144105 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This building is named Belmont, you've added the name "Unique Best Man Speeches" to the building which is clearly wrong. Unique Best Man Speeches is at best a company or office within the building. If it has a physical presence at all. A POI for the com... |
| BCNorwich | I just noticed the statement on your website "We will not spam you" OK |
|
| 45141513 | trigpoint | Hi Bernard, you have missed sport=soccorCheers Phil |
| BCNorwich | Hello Phil,No I didn't miss it, I left it for you, please see my comment here :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45139235#map=18/51.75318/0.45146, just joking. It will always be football to me! What do you think, conform or not?Regards Bernard |
|
| 45139235 | BCNorwich | Hello this area is the pitch. The stadium is the already mapped building to the east. I've changed the tag back to pitch.I would agree with the sport=football tag, and would use it myself, after all it is a football club. There is however a trend to call this game soccer. Regards |
|
| 45139148 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Could you say why you placed the POI (sculpture) in the residential relation number 2919365, as I can see no need to do this. If this was inadvertent shall I remove it from the relation (it only bloats the database). Regards. |
|
| 45104422 | BCNorwich | Hello there, your mapping of the three fields is very imprecise as to be almost valueless. Could you please make good these areas, you can zoom right in so as to very accurately map field boundary's. |
|
| 45075643 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Could you have a look at your new way 465160584 (highway=unclassified), it isn't joined to the A4178 at the eastern end. Logic would suggest it should be. Regards Bernard |
| Biggles500 | Sorry, new to this game :)Hopefully I've now managed to join the dots up. |
|
| 45065819 | BCNorwich | Hi, is the phone shop actually in the Jewish community centre? |
|
| 44619689 | lostmike | Welcome to OSMYou appear to have created a park, a footpath and a lake where there was once houses and gardens. Is this accidental or have these gardens been demolished for the purpose? |
| BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The OSM database is a live worldwide operation from which folk compile maps for you and I to use. So it's not a good thing to place fiction here. There are sites where you can make up your own fantasy maps but this is not one of them.I can find no official evid... |
| BCNorwich | No response from StarsMmd so reverted as could find no evidence in favour of the edit. |
|
| 45021086 | chillly | You have added what looks like advertising to a road junction. OSM is not Google maps, we don't host adverts. If your business is nearby (it won't be in the middle of a junction) you can add it as, say, an office. If you just wanted to add an advert you need to go elsewhere.I intend to remo... |
| BCNorwich | Hello, the tagging to this node can be removed as the information is mapped more fully at 173 Colney Hatch Lane to the north. This here is a duplication of part of the company information. ref :- http://www.ukbusinessforums.co.uk/reviews/rubbish-please-professional-rubbish-removal-in-london.324118... |
|
| 45036594 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for you additions to the OSM database. Can I please draw your attention to Church Hill.You have added a short section of highway (the length of the footway) which is actually a duplication an existing way. It's tagged ford=yes and highway=service, ther... |
|
| 44895561 | Derick Rethans | Hi!And welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your note says that you live here, but then you map it as a shelter? That's for giving shelter in forests. What you want to map this at, is a building, with address information (street, housenumber, and postcode). I realize Maps.me probably doesn't allow y... |
| BCNorwich | Hi, I've drawn in a house from Bing imagery around that node, tagged it as a house and noted that you shelter there. Please check and add any other info you can. |
| hadw | I thought there was a general principle that we did not map information about private individuals. If nothing else, it creates Data Protection Act responsibilities - full redaction may be needed if there is a a complaint.Also mapping internet_access=wlan seems to me to imply at least customer ... |
| BCNorwich | OK. Reverted my own changeset. |
|
| 44964107 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to point out that the area (please see here :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464178639#map=17/51.45434/-0.15097), you added has no descriptive tags and thus adds nothing to the database. Map compilers don't know what it is so it's ignored. Could... |
| BCNorwich | If you are saying in your changeset comment that this area is fenced then it should be tagged such. However please be more precise with the fence line and include any gaps, gates and the status of ways through the fence. Thanks. |
|
| 44967383 | SomeoneElse | Hello Mattjon and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Here you've changed Felix Close from being a residential road to a footpath: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428762672/history . If it really is a residential road (which the underlying OS OpenData from which it was added suggests) please don't change ... |
| BCNorwich | Hi, yes welcome, another observation is that this way has ended up duplicated. When the status of the way is resolved the duplicated way should be removed.Regards Bernard |
|
| 44957495 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM is a live worldwide database, we add features ti that are verifiable on the ground for other folk to make good maps. Your addition was obviously a test or an inadvertent addition so I've removed it. Regards |
|
| 44938935 | BCNorwich | Hi. There are no footways, footpaths or pavements for pedestrians in Nightingale Close. I've tagged foot use of the highway. The ways around Scotch Hill are paths, informal pedestrian ways on a desire line. Footways are a formal way usually a pavement or sidewalk, specifically constructed for pede... |
|
| 44601842 | BCNorwich | Can you be more precise as to the position, middle of the walkway doesn't really help. A name and any other details would be helpful as well. |
| BCNorwich | No response so removed as no information can be gained. |
|
| 44921876 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I removed the address from the building, as it has several addresses for many areas of the building. Placed address and extra details on the POI. |
|
| 44903867 | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. This should probably be amenity=social club, bar implies it is open to the public, whereas a social club has membership rules.Cheers Phil |
| BCNorwich | Yes welcome to OSM. Actually the facility is already mapped and all information is on the building outline. It is tagged as amenity=social_club, so I have removed your POI so as not to duplicate the information, hope that's OK. |
| trigpoint | Well spotted, the building and club outline are separate and overlapping ways. That could do with a tidy up while you are removing the node. |
| BCNorwich | Sorry forgot to mention the duplicate I removed as well. |
|
| 44844273 | BCNorwich | Hello there, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Untagged way 463240250 that just goes out into a field, was that inadvertent, can it be removed? |
| Sam Liam Perkins | If you mean Pen Hill Lane, that was meant to be there.If you mean something else that I missed, feel free. |
| Sam Liam Perkins | Oh, I see what you meant now. Stupid spindly bit I left poking off of Mill Lane. Yes, that was an accident, you can remove that. |
| BCNorwich | OK, removed. |
|
| 44856394 | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.These two additions look like fiction, a nightclub in a grassed park, a highway rest area in the middle of a street. You either had a very good night or a very bad one.I have removed the features, however if you can show me wrong I'll gladly apologise and put the ... |
|
| 44827047 | BCNorwich | Many inaccuracy's were left, I've repaired as many as I can easily see. |
|
| 44818524 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately this changeset has made two highways over the same route, a footway and a cycleway. To the South East one reaches the road the other doesn't. The route across this field (as shown on the OS map) is a designated right of way being a public footpath. ... |
|
| 44818611 | BCNorwich | Hello there, are you sure this building is named correctly? OS map has the name as Laurel Farm. |
|
| 44809556 | BCNorwich | Hello several highways that you've tagged as sidewalk to one side or the other actually have sidewalks on both sides for some sections, in one case there is a section with no sidewalk at all, left or right. |
| itstricky | Hi BCNorwich,Thanks for the feedback. In cases where a pavement ceases and/or (re)commences, would it instead be desirable to split the sidewalk off to a separate footpath running alongside, or split the actual roadway into sections to allow for more accurate sidewalk mapping? I couldn't find guid... |
| BCNorwich | Hello There, It's usual to split the highway into sections to accommodate changes in the highways characteristics, be that a change in sidewalk, speed limit, name change or designation etc. As for sidewalks (pavements to the side of roads usually separated from the carriageway by a kerb) it's usual ... |
|
| 44809908 | BCNorwich | I just looked at the mapping here and observe that one path is not joined to the highway network at either end. The other looks like it should be joined to the service road. |
|
| 44792085 | BCNorwich | Hi, changed the dyke name to South Oby Dyke. |
| norfolkbroadsnetwork | Ah, great, cheers! |
| BCNorwich | No problem. Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've looked at your mapping, made a couple of minor adjustments which I commented on for you to see.Regards Bernard |
| norfolkbroadsnetwork | Great, thanks. We're intending to add a lot more data specific to Boaters. |
|
| 44792484 | BCNorwich | Adjusted tag amenity numbering. |
| BCNorwich | Although the underscore is not incorrect it shows as not right in some tagging checkers. The colon does not present an anomaly and putting the numbers from (no number) 0 upwards keeps features numerically in line.I think that makes sense! |
|
| 44786678 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Are you trying to make new Pokémon sites by any chance?We like to see new editors, if you have any questions, feel free to ask |
| BCNorwich | Hi, could you please verify that the four park areas are recreation areas that are open to the public? If they are then it would be good to map the access to them.If they are not then leisure=park is not a correct description to use. Perhaps landuse=grass/meadow ornatural=grassland would be be... |
|
| 44720205 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just wanted to let you know that it's not necessary to always tag a two-way road as 'oneway=no'. A two way road without a 'oneway key/tag' is, (in the absence of a 'oneway=yes' tag) automatically taken as being 'oneway=no'So although not being incorrect ''onewa... |
|
| 44711841 | BCNorwich | Hi, I just changed the tag from park to recreation ground to better reflect the areas use. |
|
| 44711732 | chillly | Welcome to OSMWhen I see your first edit deleting stuff with comment of deleting excessive detail, this is worrying. OSM wants MORE detail not less. Why have you deleted stuff like this? |
| chillly | Looking at this more closely I have reverted this edit. There is no way all this should be deleted. |
| BCNorwich | Just wanted to add support to the decision to revert this changeset. It's very easy to make mistakes when you first jump into OSM mapping, I'm sure freefromsociety can make positive contributions. Just takes little research as to best practices first. |
| SomeoneElse | Whilst it might make sense to restore some of this detail, I'm a bit sceptical about others - I doubt that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385445828 is any sort of "pedestrian area", for example. |
| trigpoint | Also, whilst not part of this changeset. The A16 is incorrectly mapped as a dual carriageway. This could use a tidy up. |
|
| 44624218 | BCNorwich | Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've looked at what you've added to the database and see quite a few problems. The Howardian Hills: Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty is not just the area you mapped (please see the map here :- http://www.howardianhills.org.uk/about-us/). There is no lar... |
|
| 42958843 | BCNorwich | Hi, you need to tag the buildings (building=house) otherwise they won't show on the map. I've done the ones at Marzion. |
|
| 39956780 | BCNorwich | Hi, a few of your ways are not tagged! |
| BCNorwich | Forgot to say please see :- http://tinyurl.com/jf5amft |
| BCNorwich | No reply so removed some untagged ways. |
|
| 44603969 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenSreetMap.You might not be aware that OSM is a live worldwide database. Thus everything we add must be correct and precise. I have reverted your changeset/additions because they added ways are duplicates and somewhat fictitious. I hope you can understand the desire to keep ... |
|
| 44493445 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap, a live worldwide database from which folk make lots of maps.I just looked at your addition to OSM and there are some problems. You've somehow added an area on Ledborough Road, 600 feet long 0ft wide. The candle company does not exist in the middle of Wilton Roa... |
| BCNorwich | No response from the mapper so the changeset has been reverted. |
|
| 44616825 | lostmike | Welcome to OSMWhy have you extended this footpath on to existing streets? There's really no need to add separate ways for this. |
| BCNorwich | Yes Welcome to OpenStreetMap, I have reverted your changeset because the duplicated ways would only serve to disrupt existing data. If you need any help adding something please just ask or read up how to do it properly. There's a help section here :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/helpRegards |
|
| 44634982 | BCNorwich | Hi, I removed a path and an untagged way which looked totally out of place, I suppose you're still learning. Please remember this is a live worldwide database. Please don't upload stuff till you're sure it's correct. Regards & Thanks |
|
| 44634971 | BCNorwich | Hi, I have reverted this changeset because it inadvertently dragged parish boundary, paths, roads ect out of original alignment. |
|
| 44604293 | BCNorwich | Hello, I've tidied up the paths you marked and placed descriptive tags on them. They will now appear on the map.I drew the paths from the Bing image, hope they are OK. How do the paths connect to the recreation ground and/or paths to the south please? Also do you know details of the nature trail a... |
|
| 44603968 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've drawn the recreation ground which is all foot access. |
|
| 44653684 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I can find no evidence of this park and stream or moat. With three houses being demolished there should have been a planning request at least. I have therefore removed your additions. Perhaps the park is in a different place? Your mapping was actually pretty go... |
| Glassman | I suspect this was an attempt to influence pokemon go. Good to see it removed. |
|
| 44632640 | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Please remember that OSM is a live database, and we only map what exists in the real world.Aerial imagery suggests that this path does not exist, can you convince me otherwise? |
| BCNorwich | Yes Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The park doesn't look right either. I can find no reference to a park or public space here. It is likely to be part of Woolmer's park, a large farm. |
| trigpoint | Reverted |
|
| 44623857 | BCNorwich | Hello, This path duplicates a way already mapped as a shared cycleway. It adds nothing so should really be removed. |
|
| 44608112 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for adding the park. Just a few pointers I have removed a duplicate park outline. Amended the park outline, name and path. There are many more features to this new park it would be good if you could survey and map them.Regards Bernard |
|
| 44619270 | BCNorwich | Outline of park area is mapped, no need for a POI |
|
| 44604913 | BCNorwich | removed duplicated way, added foot=yes tag to specifically imply foot use. |
|
| 44604635 | BCNorwich | Hi you now have here the existing service road (Greenwich Industrial Estate) and your footpath (the movement) on top of each other. One must be wrong? Also each word in a proper name should be capitalised. |
| Carlos Quiñones Seirul-lo | There is no industrial Estate anymore for a few years. Now there's a housing complex called The Movement and this path is a very good shortcut to the greenwich train station |
|
| 44604355 | BCNorwich | Northern section of path was a duplication of an existing cycleway. |
|
| 44600679 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The name at least, and perhaps the website and address would be very helpful additions to the database. |
|
| 44602224 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just looked at your addition to the OSM database. This way is already in OSM so the new way is a duplication, thus I have removed it. You did add some new data which I have included on the existing way. I also see the way extends to the service road at north so... |
|
| 44593741 | BCNorwich | Added your post:postcode=E3 5GY onto the highway as postalcode=E3 5GY which is the correct way to add this information to a highway. Regards |
|
| 44593609 | BCNorwich | Hi just removed housename =1 as that is not the house name. |
|
| 44263090 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I can find no reference to a hostel on Henrietta Street, Spalding. Items added to the OSM database must be verifiable by some means, preferably on the ground. Can you show that this POI exists please?Regards. |
| BCNorwich | No response so POI removed. |
|
| 44421535 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Sadly your first addition to the OSM database has gone wrong. I have had to revert your changeset that has inadvertently dragged the building outline out of shape. Everything is now back as it was.Regards |
|
| 44484007 | BCNorwich | You should have been alerted by my comments by now. So can you please finish with adding fiction to the map? It's rather a silly game but you've shown that you do have good skills for mapping. The OpenStreetMap community would like to make you welcome to contribute in a more constructive way.All B... |
| SomeoneElse | @BCNorwich , see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1122 . |
| BCNorwich | @SomeoneElse, Have you removed all the fiction? As I usually follow up what I comment on.Regards |
| SomeoneElse | @BCNorwich http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kLz finds couple of nodes created in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44483642 - that probably needs looking at to see what joins were created there. |
|
| 44493582 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.May I point out that the building you've address tagged as number 19 is actually a pair of semi detached houses. The address would only apply to one house not both. The other buildings are semis as well. If you need help splitting the building please just ask. ... |
|
| 44090227 | BCNorwich | removed as mapped in the wrong place. |
|
| 43700961 | BCNorwich | Hello There,I just wanted to point out a few problems I can see in this changeset. The highway=track that you've drawn continuously up and down the field are not highways. They are the trails the tractor made while ploughing and planting the crop.The south field is not landuse=grass it should ... |
| BCNorwich | Not response so fiction is now deleted. |
|
| 44483980 | BCNorwich | Fiction. |
|
| 44483990 | BCNorwich | Fiction, and not very imaginative. |
|
| 44483925 | BCNorwich | Middle of the sea? |
|
| 44483837 | BCNorwich | ? |
|
| 44483810 | BCNorwich | Fiction? name is tagged wrong, way goes across fields. |
|
| 44483790 | BCNorwich | Again fields. |
|
| 44483767 | BCNorwich | In the middle of a field? |
|
| 44483722 | BCNorwich | This is reverted, looks like it was a practice or something went wrong. There was a building on-top of a building with one corner dragged up over the railway line 1/2 mile away. |
|
| 44483642 | BCNorwich | Hi, the new path is mapped on top of some buildings, as described by the tag layer=1 which means that item is above the building. But it is also tagged tunnel=yes which indicates it is under or through the building. Clearly the is something not quite right or lacking here? |
|
| 44483619 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted this addition as the new road (Residential Road) is a fiction possibly added by mistake or as a test. The live worldwide database is not the place for testing. Regards |
|
| 42931317 | BCNorwich | With respect, Way: 447956699 lacks any tagging and looks a bit unusual. Regards |
| SK53 | Removed. Turns out it was an accidentally duplicated from the grammar school way even though it doesnt look quite the same. |
|
| 44443297 | BCNorwich | Hello There, I think you may be mistaken regarding the existence of this path. There is a faint path that can be seen on the Bing image from the end of the track. (Certainly the track section ought not be deleted.) The mapper uploaded a gpx trace for the whole route. Starting from the car park going... |
|
| 44475287 | BCNorwich | Tweaked school building and tags. |
|
| 44475259 | BCNorwich | Removed building which was mapped on the pedestrian bridge over the railway. Station is already mapped. |
|
| 44475159 | BCNorwich | Tweaked the building outlines and addresses. |
|
| 44475107 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.May I please point out that this addition to the OSM database inadvertently duplicate a residential land use area. There are more than fifty house numbers, not just the one you added. There are two or more postcodes. Post codes and house numbers are best added ... |
|
| 44284286 | BCNorwich | Hello, just wanted to let you know that this is a live worldwide database from which lots of ordinary folk build maps. So I have removed your track. You are most welcome to add genuine features to OSM and there are plenty of resources to learn how to do this properly.Regards |
|
| 44420926 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It is impossible to work out what you wanted to achieve with this addition to the live OSM database as there are no descriptive tags. What I can deduce is that as far as I am aware this line is not verifiable as existing in reality, (unless you can enlighten me).... |
| BrianWharf | Feel free, what I was trying to achieve doesn't seem possible here. Also, you may wish to get somebody to read back your text as some of it seems rather condescending. |
| trigpoint | What were you trying to achieve? Maybe someone can help. OSN is based around tags, so any untagged object will do nothing in OSM. |
|
| 44417207 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have removed the address tags, as there are several post codes and hundreds of numbers on this road also the name was already tagged.I think there are other roads near/adjoining that have 20mph limits, it would be good if you could survey and map those limits... |
|
| 44359589 | BCNorwich | Hi, are you sure Fairways joins to Granville Road here now, there was a fence and verge separating them? |
| Mintra | Not sure what you mean by the fence and verge "separating" them, but then I did not see it before. Certainly it is now an open and working junction. |
|
| 44359627 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for the recent additions to the OSM database. I have however removed POIs :- Westminister Abbey, Trafalgar Square, and both National Gallery. The reason being that the information in the POIs is already mapped/contained on the feature (area or building). T... |
|
| 44285817 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your changeset in order to reinstate the altered land/building use tags, thus maintain the business park area. Also to reinstate positions of highways inadvertently moved. This reversion reinstates the Gomez building which was deleted. Added a f... |
|
| 43861420 | BCNorwich | Outlined areas of heath you have mapped have several sections where the line doubles back on itself. It's really very easy to map areas like this correctly. Please read up on better methods as you are repeatedly doing this. See http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-4.08161&lat=5... |
| BCNorwich | Removed several area outline self intersections and re-tagged areas. Much better now. |
| SomeoneElse | @BCNorwich - thanks. |
|
| 44157057 | BCNorwich | Removed some self intersecting area outlines for you. |
|
| 44084508 | BCNorwich | Hi, a lot of the area you have mapped as heath is actually forest. |
|
| 44084337 | BCNorwich | More self intersections of area outline.Plus now including large obvious areas of water in you natural=heath.Please take time to map things properly. |
|
| 43931806 | BCNorwich | Removed self intersection from area outline of natural=wood |
|
| 44229983 | Tomas Straupis | This change will be reverted because it is made with no local knowledge, based on incorrect microsoft/bing data and very inaccurate mapbox "calculations" etc. |
| BCNorwich | Hi, thanks for the correction and thanks for not just reverting but making better adjustments. |
|
| 44232810 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted this changeset in order to put back into its original place a footpath that was inadvertently moved. |
|
| 43858128 | BCNorwich | Re-tagged to show disused as pub with note on new use. More appropriate that a fictitious name. |
| BCNorwich | Alterations did not upload, now redone. |
|
| 43647609 | BCNorwich | This is Southend University Hospital - MSCP.There are now two car parks mapped on top of each other. The service road layout has also changed. |
| Lord Hartley | Yes, I know, I work there and slowly getting site plans and making adjustments.. |
| BCNorwich | OK thanks! |
|
| 44083733 | BCNorwich | Hello, why map this heath area on top of the already mapped forest areas? It really doesn't make much sense, especially as it's very easy to map the areas correctly from the Bing image that you seem to be traceing. |
|
| 44125270 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Things added to OSM must SerVre a purpose and be verifiable on the ground by all. I take it that this castle is in your mind and therefore only verifiable by your good self. I will revert the addition, reverting means it can easily be reinstated should you be abl... |
|
| 44124931 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your outline is not correct with regard to Bloody Oaks Quarry nature reserve. It is a Leicestershire & Rutland Wildlife Trust property outline shown here :- http://www.lrwt.org.uk/nature-reserves/bloody-oaks-quarry/Regards |
| RodgersJS | Hi, The area I outined is in fact the reserve. I've visited it oftenRegards |
|
| 44007370 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see you made your first contribution to the map. Unfortunately it looks like a fiction, obviously just a test. I have reverted that trial run so no harm is done to the live worldwide database.If you wish to make a usefull addition I would suggest starting her... |
|
| 43835054 | BCNorwich | Hello There,You've made some really good additions to OpenStreetMap, I'm sure the community appreciates that. The latest additions/alterations however are a bit silly so I have reverted those changes.Regards |
|
| 43919695 | BCNorwich | Fictions have been deleted. |
|
| 43919667 | BCNorwich | Fictions have been deleted. |
|
| 43919516 | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
|
| 43866766 | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
|
| 43866742 | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
|
| 43866709 | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
|
| 43866585 | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
|
| 43866349 | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
|
| 43866281 | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
|
| 43938634 | trigpoint | Hi, this should probably be tagged as a gallery rather than an artwork.Cheers Phil |
| BCNorwich | Agree, changed. |
|
| 43937796 | trigpoint | Hi, changing Tesco Express from amenity=fuel to a shelter looks very odd to me. Is there a good reason for that?Cheers Phil |
| BCNorwich | Sorry, I wanted to add the feature/area as a shelter but failed to realise I was removing the fuel tag from amenity. Looking at it again shelter doesn't seem right anyway. Now found building=canopy, perfect.Regards |
|
| 43888796 | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. There is no need to fill the name tag with what is a description.We can see it is a postbox from its amenity tag. Cheers Phil |
| BCNorwich | Corrected operator name spelling and collection time syntax. |
|
| 43898421 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This is a live worldwide database from which hundreds of maps are made. As such it relies on the data provided by folk like you to be precise and accurate. Unfortunately you newly added path is somewhat lacking.Your path lacks any description tags thus map ma... |
|
| 43798820 | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to the worldwide OpenStreetMap database.Your three recently mapped POI are complete fiction so I have reverted the changesets. Everything added to the OSM database must be verifiable on the ground and the is nothing verifiable at these three positions. Please feel free to map the ad... |
|
| 43710320 | BCNorwich | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've joined your new path to the rest of the highway system. As it was the path wasn't linked to anywhere, so therefore pretty useless. Joined up routers can use it to guide folk.Regards |
| djcater | This was my first edit, thank you for linking it up! Looks great. |
|
| 43667291 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've looked through your first additions to the live worldwide OSM database and would like to make a few comments, (comments hopefully to allow your mapping contributions to be more meaningful).All your uploaded changesets have the same comment, (the HOT one yo... |
|
| 43045992 | BCNorwich | Hi, there are now several sections of duplicated highway. The existing mapped highways have a second highway placed on top of it. There is only one highway which could accommodate all descriptive tags. But the existing highway should take precedence for routeing purposes. |
| Valleys Cycling | Hi, I am sorry, I have only just noticed your discussion comment. I shall try and edit but I am still learning. In some places I do not want to show the proposed cycleway as part of the existing highway as it might be a proposed new section alongside the road. At other points I do want the cycleway ... |
| Valleys Cycling | I have edited these now so there shouldn't be highways on top of highways. Any other feedback, let me know.Thanks |
|
| 43616663 | BCNorwich | Hello, I just wanted to point out that your recent mapping contains numerous self intersections on heath area outlines. Please see here for examples :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-3.83213&lat=53.03433&zoom=10&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_po... |
|
| 43547223 | BCNorwich | Doesn't really convey the fact that this is a "Children's Play Area and Hard Court".Also "By Village Hall" is not it's name, rather a description as to its location, (beside the village hall). |
|
| 43547206 | BCNorwich | South Woodham Garage I think. Do they still sell fuel? |
|
| 43546959 | BCNorwich | Hi, I have put the full name for this works on the property that was already mapped. Thus the property is updated and the POI unnecessary so is removed. |
|
| 43446050 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Features added to the OSM database must be factual and verifiable on the ground by any one. So this POI looks like it is a fiction. It is in fact a Post Box address and as such should be removed. |
| trigpoint | Should we not just remove the spam, and tag it as a postbox. The shop could probably use a post office node too? |
| BCNorwich | Agreed that makes sense. My information came from a web search so I'm not free to transfer that positional data. If you're happy please make the change. |
|
| 43480036 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your addition/alteration to the OSM database as it actually adds nothing, just drags two other highways out of alignment. So in effect I have put the highways back as they were.Please take a little time to learn OSM basics before having anothe... |
|
| 43446277 | trigpoint | If http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4485696947 is a postbox, then it should be tagged amenity=postbox, there will be a ref on the plate. It will not have a postcode as it is not somewhere post is delivered to. |
| Jim Thurston | This is the postal address for The Maylands Mayl - The PostBox is where the mail is placed so that it doesn't get mixed up with the mail for the supermarket. |
| trigpoint | So is thete an office inside the supermarket building? |
| BCNorwich | Hi, this is a Post Office Box presumably inside the post office not outside the building. From their website (http://www.themaylandsmayl.com/) there is no office at the building. |
|
| 43274873 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Please read up a bit before adding features to the OSM database as it's a live worldwide site from which folk make maps. Please see the Help items at the top of the page. Incomplete or incorrect data tends to mess with proper rendering.Your two nodes near bank ... |
| BCNorwich | Two untagged nodes removed, Safe Haven added. |
|
| 43401711 | BCNorwich | All are sadly lacking information, some are wrong. |
|
| 43376035 | trigpoint | Again, is this really here? |
| trigpoint | It is too close to http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4120739487 to be likely |
| BCNorwich | This node is not listed on the website :- https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/cycling/santander-cyclesThere is a bike rental place listed and mapped just over the water on Goods Way. |
| trigpoint | I had already pointed out that node, and we really should not be using gm based tfl.gov.uk |
|
| 43375930 | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.This edit looks a little odd, the name indicates that these should be bicycle_hire but I am not sure about these. There are others mapped nearby and it is unlikely that such things would be missing from the map. Do you have any more information? |
| BCNorwich | I don't think 4478909590 exists, but there is a dock round the corner on Greenland Road.The other two I've tagged similar to other cycle hire stations. If Lui_E98 would like to look at these and use this type of tagging it would concur with how other stations are mapped. |
| trigpoint | I am not convinced any exist, discussion on irc suggested that they are personal markers of some sort. Cycle hire is not something our London mappers generally miss.I was planning to revert, just seeing if I can get a response from the maps.me user. |
| BCNorwich | Nodes 4478899792 and 4478899791 are listed at the mapped position on the website :- https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/cycling/santander-cyclesNode 4478899790 is not listed, there is a bike rental just around the corner. |
| SomeoneElse | For info, see "message to you as one that has to be read before you can continue mapping" at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1076 . |
|
| 43361347 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see the shop WONDEROUND is not correctly placed and has been situated actually on the street. The shop is some distance up the road beyond Boundary Street, also you've got the number wrong.It would be best to correct these problems. If you cannot draw the pre... |
| ytera | thank you for the correction. I couldn't correct the mark on the map so I've placed a new mark for WONDEROUND. kindly confirm. |
| harg | I can only see one of them -- to the East of Boundary Street.Oh, and could you avoid using all-caps for company names. |
| BCNorwich | OK the two were in place when the page was refreshed. I've now removed the first (misplaced) one. After a minute and the page refreshed again only the corrected POI displayed. Thanks yteraAs for all capitol letters in the name, that is how the company writes it. I agree it's not good to see. |
| ytera | understood. I've corrected the company name. |
|
| 43337593 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.You've made some useful modifications to the OSM database. One problem that I think you might be unaware of, the placing of a tree in the middle of Waterhouse Lane by the Esso fuel station. Although it appears not to interfere with the highway I think it's fictit... |
|
| 43313632 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see you have also named that section of highway from the A143 south to Water Lane as Church Road. Your upload comment suggests you did not mean to add the name to the whole section. Please be aware that a highway can be edited to split the way into two sect... |
|
| 43287573 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your change to it's original state because the deleted way was not a duplicate. The highway you thought was a better placement is actually a bus lane. There are, as can be seen on the Bing image, three ways from Gubbins Lane into Station Road.... |
|
| 42772122 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Several of the ways you've recently added to OSM are not joined to the roads that they go to, (in this and other change-sets). Also in many instances they cross streams and other boundary's without showing how these barriers are overcome.May I suggest you read... |
| BCNorwich | Tidied up quite a few footpaths, corrected where paths cross water and added a few bridges. |
|
| 43266778 | BCNorwich | Hi, you've placed a park inside of a park which doesn't seem correct. Further the two park boundaries are joined at one of the nodes. |
|
| 43266726 | BCNorwich | A brief look at the paths you've added shows a few anomalies. Several paths are not connected to the roads that they got to. Several paths are on such similar lines that they might be duplication's. Several paths are joined to or go along area outlines. It might be wise to look at them all and recti... |
|
| 43231745 | BCNorwich | Hello, I think you have positioned this property on the wrong side of the road (as far as the existing mapping of roads is concerned). It is not therefore verifiable on the ground as mapped. Further it is very unlikely that the feature is officially name "Home". Also if it is your home i... |
| trigpoint | Reverting #DROB |
|
| 43230784 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This area looks like it is entirely residential with no shops. Could you please state the name and details of the business? Is it a business operated from a house? Does it have a website to verify it exists?Features added to the OSM database should be verifiab... |
|
| 43223356 | Harry Wood | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see you've added "my home". It worked! But I guess there is no guesthouse called "my home" here. Instead I've changed it for you, to be a building=house. The address information is still on there, and that's great. You're welcome to add more address... |
| BCNorwich | Yes Welcome, I've just corrected the postcode for you. |
|
| 43219999 | BCNorwich | Hello, your opening hours are incorrectly presented. please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours |
|
| 43193010 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think if you visit this footpath you will find it is a public right of way. Therefore tagging should reflect this, foot=designated, designation=public_footpath also access=permissive is incorrect and should be removed. |
|
| 43095557 | BCNorwich | Hello this "line i9n bow" that you have added to the OSM database does not contain enough information to be of any use. Unless you can expand on it, or explain it then it should be removed. |
|
| 43095490 | BCNorwich | Hello, can you state the purpose of this "blook line"? What is it, what is it for, is it verifiable? You have added it to the OMS live database and I can see no reason for it. Thanks. |
|
| 42704509 | BCNorwich | For your attention please. There is still a lot more duplicated ways where you have placed a new footway on top of existing highways. The whole lot should be removed as it is incorrect, (there are not two ways one atop another), and it corrupts routing software. |
| Morrolan | My apologies for my ignorance - as I created this as one single line, I assumed that deleting it would remove all traces, however as you say this doesn't appear to be the case.Please could you point me to a specific point where this is still in error (or inform me what I am looking for, i.e. how... |
| BCNorwich | HI, I could now only find one long section of duplication near Kinmel Bay, I've deleted it all rather than trying to explain where it is. I think you've removed all the other sections. I noticed the duplication's as I regularly check new mapping for these problems here :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/o... |
| Morrolan | Hi Bernard, many thanks for that. I will ensure that I read the url's you sent me so that I can avoid causing more issues in the future.The Wales Coast Path, whilst it does share some coastal distance, is a separate path from the North Wales Path which ventures inland from the coast. However i... |
|
| 42978994 | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately your up updating of this way has resulted in a duplication of highways, (one atop another). There seems to be no on the ground restriction to access through this way so I wonder why the access=private tag? Nor any official 20mph restriction that is v... |
|
| 42883804 | BCNorwich | Hello, sorry to say I think you've had a mishap with this changeset. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93715163It looks like Way: Duddingston Gardens (93715163) has been aligned in a circle. Also dragging part of the railway fence, which shared several nodes, with it (Way: 405090252).... |
|
| 42880271 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I'd just like to point out that your addition to the database (highway named Hudson Way) is not joined to the existing highway network. If you know it is joined to the network then it would be good for you to map it as such. The road immediately north is a serv... |
|
| 42350967 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.There is still a problem here, your addition and subsequent amendments leave a duplicated outline for the building. Both outlines similarly tagged.With respect I think the eastern third of the building might be a house. The western two thirds may be two houses ... |
| BCNorwich | No response, duplicate removed. |
|
| 39214362 | BCNorwich | Hello, I've reverted your addition to the OpenStreetMap database. Reason being that this building is not at Romola Road. |
|
| 42788417 | BCNorwich | Change-set reverted!Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately your first addition to the OSM database went a bit wrong it inadvertently altered existing data and added a road haphazardly through buildings. Therefore I have reverted those alterations for you. I would suggest you read up ... |
|
| 42772672 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your addition to OSM of the sandwich shop, addressed as Washington has appeared in London UK. You've tagged it as a place of worship.If you can't amend it I'll remove it shortly. Regards |
|
| 42771493 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've tidied up your additions and changed the name tag on the garden to a note tag, I don't think that was the proper name for the area. I added landuse=grass to indicate the surface and removed the area tag, (a way, (line) enclosing an area is taken as an area a... |
|
| 42749120 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think some of the changes you made to Whiting's Lane are incorrect.This is a Norfolk County Council maintained unsurfaced road, reference U33198. Therefore, as far as OSM mapping is concerned, an unclassified highway, even though it may appear to be only a tr... |
| njwcat7 | Hi BernardI've changed the vehicle classification back; that wasn't an intended edit but probably a result of a bit of fat-fingers on my part :)I'm trying to get it shown for what it us; an unpaved road that's too rough to ride a road bike down. Having found this out the hard way yesterday w... |
| SomeoneElse | Personally if something appears to be a track I'd map it as a track :)There are plenty of places that are some sort of "road" (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50733252 ) which are best described as tracks; perhaps a designation of "unclassified_road" might work to indica... |
|
| 42708417 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The node you added is untagged and in the middle of a featureless body of water. As such it adds nothing to the OSM database and should be removed. |
|
| 42573025 | BCNorwich | Hello, I just want to point out that in adding the North Wales Path you have duplicated lots of highways. You've placed a new way on top of a lot of existing ways. A better way would be to segment the existing ways and add them to a relation, naming that relation the North Wales Path. The Wales Coas... |
| BCNorwich | I forgot to say that in great many places you now have a footway going down the middle of a vehicle highway. This duplication also seriously messes up routing. |
|
| 42572526 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The positioning of this hotel POI, in the alley behind buildings, some way away fro the address of Romford Road, will not be much help in helping folk to find it. Better to actually draw the building and state the floor if the building has multiple businesses.\... |
| trigpoint | The name translates as house, which is an unlikely name for a hotel so I suspect this yet another personal marker edit from a maps.me user. Reverting this. |
|
| 42340872 | BCNorwich | Hello, your hedge "way 443736827" covers the whole of the road Roud Road. Surely this cannot be correct. |
| BCNorwich | Also hedge way 443736828 is mapped the same. This effectively places a barrier across the whole highway. Better to map each hedge separately. An individual hedge as a linear feature can have a width (and height) tag added thereby not needing an area drawn. For an extremely thick hedge draw a closed ... |
|
| 42472217 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I noticed your addition to the OSM database and made a few alterations to better reflect the geography. Your address was on the whole building not just the bar. Regards |
|
| 42433010 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.There are a few things wrong with your addition of this bar to the OSM database. Firstly unless it has recently moved from number 3 to number 12 Balham High Road then you have placed it in the wrong position. Further the name:en tag is not needed (you've already ... |
|
| 41683473 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You have mapped your company on a block of residential apartments. You've given it an American address and phone number, also abbreviated the street name. You've tagged it as amenity=place_of_worship. All of which are obviously wrong. The website makes no mention... |
| BCNorwich | No response from mapper so the obviously incorrect data has been removed. |
|
| 42323324 | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to osm. Do you have a shop customers can visit here? |
| BCNorwich | There's no shop, that address is the registered company office for an online wine seller. |
|
| 42228550 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just an observation, I notice that Accommodation Way is not connected to Wayside/Woodside. I suspect that the ways do in fact join so it would be best to connect them in the database, thus routing can be computed and folk can render maps accordingly. Regards |
| Jan Swanwick | Thanks for the feedback. It was my first addition, so hopefully today's edit will have corrected it and made it routable.ThanksJan |
|
| 41926556 | BCNorwich | Hello, your addition of Hyde Park Place made a duplicated highway. I have therefore removed your duplicate and amended street names. |
|
| 42200328 | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution, however the Premier Inn is already mapped on the surrounding way, I am going to remove your duplicate.When editing please capitalise names properly. Thanks |
| BCNorwich | POI deleted before I saw the above comment. Note also that the tag name:en=??? is not needed. |
| trigpoint | Sorry, I meant to delete the node when I got home.The name:en problem is a feature of maps.me, not something the user has any control of.https://github.com/mapsme/omim/issues/4149 |
|
| 42186821 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The complete details for The Lamb hotel are on the building outline. I have therefore removed your duplicated information. |
|
| 42165591 | DaveF | HiBrunswick Place is the name of the southern terrace of houses & so is not an alternative road name. (Montpelier is the name of the row opposite) This happens a lot in Bath.Julian Road is the road's name throughout. |
| BCNorwich | Hi, OK I understand and agree with that. Mapper LegBritSlav added a way which duplicated part of Julian Road, I removed the duplication but kept the name thinking it might be valid. The alt:name is now removed and a note added with your information about the terraces. |
|
| 42136905 | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've made the bus stop at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/469781540/history into a bookmaker. This seems unlikely. Can you explain what happened? |
| BCNorwich | Hello,You've also added bicycle parking which is actually bicycle rental. Also tourism=attraction is not very helpful, if you know there is an attraction there why not detail it?So it unfortunately looks like all three additions are somewhat fictitious. Please correct the mistakes or remove th... |
|
| 42112841 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your addition of a name to a building because the tag name:en=??? is not needed here. Also that is not the name of that store and in any case what you added was an address "31 green street". Which lacks capitol letters and is in fact s... |
|
| 42093127 | BCNorwich | Hello, you've positioned your company 'Moving In' in a building on Floral Street not on Long Acre. |
|
| 41523070 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I notice that the two hotels you have added are not named and are in very close proximity to two named hotels. If you are mapping The Westbury Hotel and The Washington Hotel then your new POI are duplication's and should be removed.If your new POI are indeed in... |
| BCNorwich | No response from Alwaleed aljamaan so the two duplicates are removed. |
|
| 41916041 | BCNorwich | Hello There, I think you've made a few mistakes on Cleveland Gardens.Highway=residential has been removed.Motor_vehicle=no is added, but vehicles are allowed on that road.Access=permissive added, the permissiveness is only through the bollards not the whole road,Barrier=gate added, the gate ... |
|
| 42029817 | BCNorwich | Hi, the tag name:en=??? is removed as it is not needed. Phone number is corrected. |
|
| 42019413 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see you have added a name to this area. I am certain that the area is not named "clothes London" in either English or Polish so I have reverted the changes. Please take great care when adding to OSM as it is a live database used by folk the world over... |
|
| 41955267 | BCNorwich | Hi, the Prince of Wales is already mapped. Yours is a duplicate so I've removed it. |
|
| 41508247 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've looked at your first mapping and would like to make a few comments. You added (inadvertently?) two nodes without description tags (4353676095 and 4353676094), these should be appropriately tagged or if unintentional should be removed.You added (inadverte... |
| BCNorwich | No response from mapper Jorik Michiels so two untagged nodes and two untagged ways are now removed. The duplicated airport boundary was deleted by 4b696d a few days ago. The above issue is now resolved. |
|
| 41915408 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The area you have added to the OSM database is un-tagged and therefore is of little value. The OSM community welcomes new mappers but asks that you please take time to read the instructions.If you are unable to supply more information for your added feature I w... |
| tealover | Ok sorry, it was my first try and i was trying to follow the tutorial and have a go. I realised i had made a mistake but couldn't work out how to correct it.I don't think Open street mapping is for me.Hope I haven't made any serious damage. |
| BCNorwich | No trouble and no damage done that can't be remedied. What were you trying to do, add that building? I could do that for you, you can then check it. If not then I'll remove the un-tagged line.RegardsBernard |
| tealover | Thank you, I think if you remove it that will be best. My son will be able to help me grasp the basics when he is next home. Thanks for being so helpful. |
|
| 41896651 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.You have severed the North bound carriageway of Molesworth Street (Way 34910533). There is also a short stub of Rennell Street going South East to the service road tagged as :- (highway=trunk,name=Rennell Street,oneway=no) which doesn't look correct. Regards |
|
| 41884592 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have corrected the spelling of your POI and removed the unneeded tag name:en=???.I've added the website and moved the position. |
| trigpoint | The name:en is an annoying "feature" of maps.me |
|
| 41814528 | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.For Pandora it would be better if you could place the POI on the building rather than in the street. The address would help as well.Bubba Gump, are you sure this is a jewelry shop, looks like a restaurant, Please correct if it's wrong. Also address and precise pos... |
| trigpoint | Also, please could you capitalize names properly |
|
| 41804428 | BCNorwich | Hi, the shelter looks like it's placed on a block of houses. Are you sure it's placed correctly, and what type of shelter is it. |
|
| 41669470 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Quite a few of you recently added buildings have problems. Sections of outline tagged only as area=yes, some of these are added to building outlines. Buildings connected by self intersecting lines. Un-tagged building outlines.I've fixed several of these but it ... |
|
| 41161248 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.It is usual in English to write postcode, street and name with the initial letters as capitols so rather than :-addr:postcode=nw1 0aaaddr:street=bayham streetname=smart camden inn hostelYou would have :-addr:postcode=NW1 0AAaddr:street=Bayham Street... |
| BCNorwich | Fiction deleted. |
|
| 41702590 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The building you named is a group of sheds in back yards. I am pretty sure they are not named and in any case there is no need for name:en tag to be used. It's likely that this changeset would be reverted if you can't offer an explanation and verification. Regards |
| Derick Rethans | BCNorwich, the Bing imagery could be outdated though. I have fixed the duplicate name/name:en : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oaOJSTbA4bAWGtaI4K4xyvcwQLndEYtumyAbi9H8ZAE/edit?usp=sharing |
|
| 41673089 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Sorry to say that your first mapping has gone a bit wrong. There is no Royal National Hotel at the point you mapped it. Nor is this position near Russell Square, Bedford Way.I am pleased to say that the hotel is mapped correctly at :- https://www.openstreetmap.... |
|
| 41660326 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your new footpath addition duplicated a section of the adjoining footpath. I have rectified the anomaly. Regards |
|
| 41658505 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately your addition of the SKS building and POI did not go correctly. Not only was your new addition corrupted but it also adversely effected adjoining mapped features. I apologise but I have reverted your additions in order to put the database back to ... |
|
| 41596632 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've joined your new path to the road at the east end, (you had it joined to a boundary line). Also added a few details. Regards |
| rwatters | Many thanks! |
|
| 41583904 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.May I explain that OSM is a database from which all sorts of maps, for all over the world, for everyone, for free, are compiled. As such anything added to the database that is not compatible to the database standards could be extremely disruptive.Your addition ... |
|
| 41504936 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reversed the name change on the bus stop because that name is given by the bus company it is not the actual pub name. Bus company name is "The Gate, adj" meaning that the stop is adjacent to a local feature and not the feature itself.I have als... |
|
| 41444571 | BCNorwich | Hi, the building you've added facing Halliford Street is not a single building but 5 buildings, they look like semi detached houses. |
|
| 41413561 | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think you may have mapped the surgery on the wrong building.This building is number 2, the surgery is located at number 2A to the south (see here :- http://www.nhs.uk/Services/GP/Overview/DefaultView.aspx?id=38944) Click this link to see a picture of the correct... |
| senoritachiquita | Thank you very much for letting me know, I will move it. |
|
| 41385092 | BCNorwich | Hello, Ridge Road looks at lot wider than 7 feet, in fact it looks like it is an extra wide road. It is therefore not correct to tag it as maxwidth=7'0" This is obviously not the case especially as you intimate that it has been tagged thus to discourage traffic.A better way is to map exactly ... |
|
| 41364508 | BCNorwich | I think you've got this cafe in the wrong place, it is already mapped under the parent company name of Benugo at 33 Commercial Road. Your POI should therefore be removed. |
| Derick Rethans | I've reverted it. |
|
| 41246010 | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The website you posted for the restaurant is no valid so I have removed it. |
| trigpoint | The website which this changeset removed, does appear to be valid. |
| trigpoint | http://kirazu.co.uk/en/ |
| BCNorwich | But apparently the restaurant is now under new ownership and a new name. |
|
| 41221894 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.That's a block of apartments not just one. So the block address is for all apartments. |
|
| 41199896 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM is primarily a database rather than a map, information added to the database is then used by anyone to produce maps. We should not add data to influence map rendering. (to make it show up as we would like).I have removed your Tate POI as it is a duplicati... |
|
| 41167833 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM is a database rather than just a map. To go with OSM best practice I have made a few adjustments to the POI taxi service you added to the database :- adjust postcode, capitalize leading letters to road name, changed it to taxi (as per website), changed name... |
|
| 40990425 | BCNorwich | Hi, I think you've got some of your kerb's area outlines the wrong way round, please see here as to the direction of the outline way for where the top of the kerb is :- http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkerb |
|
| 41100799 | BCNorwich | Hi, for your information the building was already associated with the street and is also associated (via the street association) with the place Walton-on-the-Naze. Your addition therefore does not add anything to the database except to bloat it a tiny bit. |
|
| 41089414 | TrickyB | Incorrect title, should be 'adjusting usage of Broxted Solar Farm Footpath' |
| BCNorwich | Also you now have two highways along here. Neither of which join to the end of what is named Hall Road. My information shows this section also to be named Hall Road which continues to the cattle grid to the east. |
|
| 41087503 | EdLoach | Hi. I noticed your edit and thought maybe you'd like to also set "Allowed Access" to private as well as (or perhaps instead of) the name. This will cause the "P" shown on the standard rendering to be paler than public car parks. |
| BCNorwich | Removed the name=Private from two car parks. They may be private but there is no suggestion that they are officially or otherwise named "Private". Also added access=private tags. |
|
| 41075506 | BCNorwich | Hi, this node is where the footway (Rupert Court) joins with the street (Rupert Street). There in no restaurant in the middle of the street so I will remove it.If you know where the restaurant is sited please add the POI at that position. |
| trigpoint | Looking at the users other edits notes/edits this is a personal marker of where a tourist coach should stop. I think this should be reverted. |
| Mike Cahill | Well spotted trigpoint....I am a 'tour coach driver' and the flag is for me and my fellow drivers to navigate to that point! |
| trigpoint | Is there anything verifiable in these locations, some sort of rule you need to follow?Although it is clearly wrong to map this as a restaurant it could be a bus stop with some appropiate tags that ensure a normal map user wont walk there to try to catch a normal bus. |
| trigpoint | Hi Mike, please could you answer my question?OSM is a collaborative project and we all need to work as a community. As these edits stand, they are misleading to other map users and need to be corrected, or removed.If these are official places or marked in some way then they can be tagged accordi... |
|
| 40971074 | BCNorwich | Hi, your POI has been added to the live worldwide OpenStreetMap database. Unfortunately the information is incorrect. Westminster should have a capitol letter W. The park is actually Buckingham Palace Garden and is already mapped as such. (Did the Queen know you were there.) If you mistakenly plac... |
|
| 40770013 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see you are drawing you buildings from the roof outlines of aerial imagery. With respect may I suggest you read this page :- http://tinyurl.com/zorbq9xwhich explains how to overcome the oblique angles oft encountered in photo imagery. Your outlines for the ap... |
|
| 40316678 | BCNorwich | Hi, this parking area looks like it is not restricted to residents only. It looks like it is part of the highway, if so then the access=private tag should be removed. |
| Ben Harris | I visited Shire Hall today to check the County Council's records, and they believe that the entire parking bay, including the footway behind it, is part of the highway. |
| BCNorwich | Exactly my thinking.Also I could see nothing to prevent or restrict public use on foot of the two footways (Way: 198204474 & Way: 198204473). |
| Ben Harris | There's a sign next to each entrance to those paths saying "Private Grounds". I've added source tags to indicate this. |
| BCNorwich | OK, being remote I couldn't see that. Just needs the access=private to be removed from the parking bay. |
| SCRS | The title deeds for Sherlock Close show the property boundary bisecting the lay-by. It was not resurfaced by the county council when Sherlock Close was. This lead the residents to believe it is private. Further check will be made. |
|
| 40642702 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This is a live map seen by the world and therefore not the proper place to do testing and then upload that testing. I see you have now removed one of the unnecessary nodes. Would you please remove the others as well. Thanks. |
|
| 40523099 | BCNorwich | Reverted changeset to reinstate proper description of road and remove building connected to same road. |
|
| 40523653 | BCNorwich | I changed both names back to the proper English names. Your addition I take it was in your native language, this could be added in the correct manner like the other languages are, name:??=??????? |
|
| 40488999 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've squared up the buildings and pool to make them all look neater (I'm pretty sure they don't all have unsquare angles). This facility is available in the iD editor (select item then "Square the corners of this area").I also added access=private to ... |
|
| 40179627 | BCNorwich | Hi, if you've finished mapping the turbine positions could the untagged grid lines, (Way: 426314996) be removed as they add nothing to the map. If you wish to keep them as your reference they can be saved offline. Regards |
|
| 40153464 | BCNorwich | Hi, I removed the duplicated section of Goodmayes Road maintaining your lcn=yes tag. |
|
| 40294794 | BCNorwich | Hi, you don't show how the long footpath (Way: 174818288) crosses the two streams, are they crossed by bridges, fords?? |
|
| 40326194 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.There are a few problems with your addition to the OSM database. You placed your new node on top of an existing car park node, (only one will show, the car park). Everything added to OSM must be verifiable on the ground. The address you used is not for this poi... |
|
| 40316606 | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. You've somehow removed all tags from two foot-ways and two garden areas. Let me know if you need help fixing it. |
| Ben Harris | I've reinstated the tags, and added access=private which would seem to capture the intent behind these changes, and the situation on the ground. |
|
| 40313236 | BCNorwich | Hi I've added the college website and corrected the facility name.If you wish to add second language descriptions please do so but in the correct way. |
|
| 40087582 | BCNorwich | Hi, this cycleway you've added has resulted in a duplication of highways (one on top of another). There was an existing path here which it would have been better to amend rather than adding the duplicate way, then all history would have been retained.The matter of duplication should be corrected a... |
|
| 40157343 | BCNorwich | Hi I have removed duplicated section of way Seven Kings Road |
|
| 40229549 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Please take a bit of time to understand the basics and good practices of adding data to OSM. Your drawing of these buildings is a bit haphazard to say the least. There's lots of online help to show how to map well and you can always look at how other areas are ma... |
|
| 40280573 | BCNorwich | Is it a hairdresser as well? If not then the shop=hairdresser tag should be removed |
|
| 40227030 | BCNorwich | Hi, and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've adjusted the tags to suit OSM best practice, that is website, phone, post code and opening hours as per your website. Hope that's OK. |
|
| 40112250 | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The security company you added to the OSM database is just that, retail business or office premises. It is therefore incorrect/misleading to tag it as 'amenity=police'.Less importantly the accepted way to add telephone numbers is the international standard... |
| BCNorwich | No response so problems have now been corrected. |
|
| 40182214 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have removed the Big Ben POI as it is already mapped (POI is in the center of the building), so your mapping is duplication. The shop=beauty you've placed in the middle of the street, if you want the map to point folk to the shop then it's best to more prec... |
|
| 38469541 | BCNorwich | Welcome to OpenStreetMap.As it is the information is of little use to the database or anyone else. Would it be possible to give more company details, address ect. Maybe draw in the portion of the huge warehouse where the company is situated, even just add the entrance and put your POI on it. |
|
| 39867855 | Robert Whittaker | I see you've tagged http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423458145 as "Fritton and St Olaves FP 1", but according to the Statements I have at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/norfolk/great-yarmouth.pdf it should be "Old Parish of Herringfleet FP 1".However, those statements are... |
| BCNorwich | I used the name that I would use today to describe the path, it is FP 1 in the parish of Fritton and St Olaves. That path is now in Norfolk in the parish of Fritton and St Olaves. The parish of Herringfleet does not now exist in Norfolk even in part, the part that was in Norfolk is now called Fritto... |
| Robert Whittaker | I think you're mistaken here. The Definitive Statement is a legal document, and forms part of teh "Definitive Map and Statement" that surveying authorities are required to maintain. Moreover, the online map is not the Definitive Map (it's just a working copy), so the reference to the curre... |
|
| 39713577 | BCNorwich | Hi, On some of the designated Quietways you have actually duplicated existing highways. I have rectified the couple I've noticed as duplication's, removing your duplication and then adding the relevant section of original way to the Quietway relation.The way to add to the relation is to divide the... |
|
| 40017220 | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see you have deleted the cycle way and presume there was some mistake with that.You also inadvertently moved the church POI, I have reverted that change so the church is now back where it was originally mapped. |
|
| 39927736 | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately you have inadvertently made the corner building into a large circular shape. Also dragging out of shape the building lines within it and the building lines to either side.It might be best to revert the whole changeset and start again, unless you c... |
| BCNorwich | No response so changeset reverted. |
|
| 39978465 | BCNorwich | Hi, is the house number correct? |
| Astro*Consulting | Many thanks, was indeed wrong. I have corrected the number, am working on this end of the road from the bridge out to the junction and will be qualifying numbers and names as I go along. |
| BCNorwich | No trouble, if I can help/advise please just ask. One tip, buildings/houses usually have square corners, you can easily square up a whole building so it looks neater in iD by selecting then square corners. If you're going to be doing a lot of mapping then the JOSM editor is far superior to iD. R... |
| Astro*Consulting | Thanks BC, tried JOSM a while back but will pull it down again and work with it a while - Rgds and thanks for your help. Please stay in touch - Andy |
|
| 39860448 | BCNorwich | Sorry but the footway through the woods (Kirkwood NR) at the south west end looks like it starts from the railway line. |
|
| 39857661 | BCNorwich | *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org |
| BCNorwich | Hi, on this one the cycleway should have been split and the bridge tag added to the relevant section of way. Otherwise it would be a duplicated way, I've now done this. |
| Nick-W | Its a bit complex - the cycleway is on a ramp and the footway on steps going up in-between. Thanks for straightening out. |
|
| 39857369 | BCNorwich | *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org |
|
| 39858395 | BCNorwich | Hi, what junction is there where the cycleway twice crosses the footway? |
|
| 39770428 | trigpoint | Hi, are you sure this is genuine?Would a company really expect its employees to stay in a hostel?Looked like a personal marker to me, maps.me does seem to generate them quite frequently. |
| BCNorwich | Hi, I could not see anything to suggest a fiction. The building name and street exist, it's actually a small block of flats, the research center is not to far away. So give the benefit of any doubt? |
| SomeoneElse | There's been at least one example (in France) of people "spoofing" armchair mappers into adding inaccurate POIs based on notes. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/581423 might be entirely genuine, but a genuine local mapper would be able to (a) check that it was, (b) check whether "h... |
|
| 39735047 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Sorry but I think you are mistaken by thinking the bus-stop name is incorrect and needs changing. That bus-stop name is actually Prairie Street. It is not named after the street it is on but from the bus company designation (Naptan Atco Code). Please inspect the ... |
|
| 39714921 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap, your changes have nearly all resulted in the misalignment of ways and buildings. Also the deletion of the name from a section of Charing Cross Road. As the inadvertent changes are intertwined it would be best to revert all of the changeset thus being sure to corre... |
|
| 39702595 | BCNorwich | Reverted changeset to remove factitious hamlet from middle of Short Street, and replace the deleted traffic hump. |
| BCNorwich | Strange, user 'grabbitcompk' does not exist. |
| SomeoneElse | @BCNorwich - probably deleted after I reported it as spam in #osm-dev |