| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52276209 by dixonbainbridge | 1 | 2017-09-22 17:46:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You actually didn't remove a oneway tag from the bridge, because there wasn't one to remove.You did however add the tag oneway=no. A oneway=no tag is not necessary as usually in the absence of oneway=yes OSM takes there to be no oneway restriction, (except in s... |
| 51969670 by damejude | 1 | 2017-09-12 13:42:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think you might have made a mistake. Is there really a huge pond in that back garden? If not then could you please remove it. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-09-22 06:34:17 UTC | BCNorwich | With no response I've now removed the lake from the garden. | |
| 51906972 by Rondon237 | 1 | 2017-09-12 06:20:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello I just wanted to let you know that your recently added cycleway (Way: 523284869) is placed on top of a footway (Way: 4356852) that has been in the database for many years. Thus a duplication occurs. I see, from the history that the footpath has in the past been tagged as a cycleway. Also tha... |
| 2 | 2017-09-22 06:30:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Thanks for amending this. | |
| 51939922 by nitrox11 | 1 | 2017-09-22 06:23:24 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, there is no note on Green Gate passage.Mapped as it is the footway is shown as going through a building, is this correct? If so is it a passageway through the building? |Which should be mapped accordingly, passage/tunnel.Or a walkway that is part of the shop between a front and back ... |
| 52145848 by İsmət_S | 1 | 2017-09-19 12:12:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the "highway=motorway_junction" tag on Node: 1652765719 is confusing as it is on a junction between a primary and a tertiary highway. If there's no motorway then there's likely no need for a junction tag.Similarly the few nodes tagged as junctions to the SW are IMHO not needed.Re... |
| 2 | 2017-09-19 15:33:24 UTC | İsmət_S | I fixed all of these. Best regards. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-19 16:26:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, yes it all looks good now, Well done and Thanks.Regards Bernard | |
| 52169764 by İsmət_S | 1 | 2017-09-19 11:40:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I notice that there is a duplication of ways (one way directly on top of a second way). This is at the west ends of Way: 525847472 and Way: 525847471 where they join onto Way: Qaravəlli əsas yol (151563580).I can help fix this if you wish.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-09-19 11:42:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Also Way: 525847473 does not join onto Way: 525620908. Again I can help if you wish. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-19 11:44:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Also Way: 525847468 does not join onto Way: Qaravəlli əsas yol (151563580). | |
| 4 | 2017-09-19 12:01:16 UTC | İsmət_S | Hell. Thank you for your attention. I fixed all of these | |
| 5 | 2017-09-19 12:29:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Well done, very sorry but Way: 525847471 is now not joined. | |
| 52149355 by İsmət_S | 1 | 2017-09-19 11:50:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, at junction Node: 1651249775 three highways join the junction but the aerial image seems to indicate that the three ways join prior to the junction with only one way going roughly north from the primary road. |
| 2 | 2017-09-19 11:57:03 UTC | İsmət_S | Hi. Can you fix it please? | |
| 3 | 2017-09-19 12:00:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Also your 20 speed limit sign Node: Max speed (5113273875) is not joined to the highway. It is therefore ignored as, on it's own it is not designating a highway for the restricting limit to be applied to. 20 as a Maxspeed is 20kph, that's rather slow for a primary highway or is it because of the s... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-19 12:02:19 UTC | İsmət_S | it is because of the school | |
| 5 | 2017-09-19 12:23:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've amended the junction where the three roads head north, matching it as closely to the Bing image as I could.I have split the primary highway at roughly where you had your speed markers and tagged the highway as maxspeed=20. Now router software will take notice of the speed limit on that ... | |
| 6 | 2017-09-19 15:28:05 UTC | İsmət_S | I looked at the speed limits. They are 50 KPH | |
| 52145904 by İsmət_S | 1 | 2017-09-19 12:04:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, a Zebra crossing (Node: 5113090051) has several wide black and white stripes painted on the highway, I cannot see any stripes on any aerial image. If the crossing lacks these stripes it should just be tagged as highway=crossing.Regards |
| 2 | 2017-09-19 15:30:07 UTC | İsmət_S | It is because of, aerial images are very old for Azerbaijan | |
| 51997969 by camgeddesuk | 1 | 2017-09-17 07:40:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I appreciate that you wanted to add your farm walk onto OSM and the manner (as far as you were aware) is excellent. However the entire route duplicates existing highways. OSM is a live worldwide database which your walk is now a part of. Unfortunately maps and so... |
| 52048770 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-09-15 06:21:35 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Hello BCNorwich. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506527041 you have tagged `akt:name=...`, which is unkown. I think it should be `alt:name=...`, right? Please have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names #newkey #typo |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 06:26:26 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Sorry, i was to fast: `alt_name`, underscore instead of colon... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-15 06:51:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, thanks for the comment, yes my mistake trying to to quickly with my two finger typing.I tried altering it between your above comments and was going to say I think JOSM actually allowed akt:name= but on amending now it warned against alt:name= I have now amended it to alt_name= All now OK.By... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-15 06:54:44 UTC | Harald Hartmann | http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm | |
| 5 | 2017-09-15 06:59:12 UTC | BCNorwich | Thanks | |
| 52051006 by aswiseman | 1 | 2017-09-15 06:25:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just wanted to let you know that Knights Way has been drawn over a footpath without joining to it.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 09:19:31 UTC | aswiseman | Thanks for this. The footpath no longer exists (part of the old golf course or the nature reserver that replaced it), so I have deleted it. | |
| 52052012 by aswiseman | 1 | 2017-09-15 06:22:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello,If Knighys Way is private then the tag access=private should be added to the way not included in the name tag. Then add permitted access (to allow for access onto the footpath that Knights Way crosses). Also the road/footpath junction ought to be joined up.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 09:24:07 UTC | aswiseman | Hi Bernard. Thanks for letting me know the convention. I have removed "(Private Road)" from the name (even though it appears on the street sign this way ) and have tagged it with "access" = "private", as you suggested. Andrew | |
| 52051753 by aswiseman | 1 | 2017-09-15 06:15:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi your new way crosses an existing cycleway, if they phisically join on the ground then this ought to be represented in OSM.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 09:29:11 UTC | aswiseman | Hi Bernard. They do physically meet, so I have joined them up. Thanks, Andrew | |
| 52002320 by EnDanMap | 1 | 2017-09-13 12:33:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The school name and website are on the school area outline so don't need to be added again. |
| 51997502 by Iain McNaught | 1 | 2017-09-13 12:27:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The fact that swimming_pool does not show as blue on the cycle map has nothing to do with the OSM database but rather the specific way the cycle map is rendered. We are requested to map what is on the ground not map to show up certain coulers for features. (The p... |
| 51990813 by Palash Davé | 1 | 2017-09-13 06:56:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've drawn in some house outlines in that road so the houses could be numbered rather than the road, making it a lot better.If you don't want to do the numbering I could do it if you give me a few building number positions.Regards BernardPS I've drawn... |
| 51969507 by damejude | 1 | 2017-09-12 13:50:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, are the fields really named f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6. These numbers might refer to area designations but not necessarily be actual names.Also a similar query for the lake, is it really named "lake"? If it is then should it be capitalised to "Lake"Regards Bernard |
| 51921419 by nitrox11 | 1 | 2017-09-11 06:00:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The footpath you added does not look quite right. A lit public highway (footway) would not normally go through a building terminating at its front wall. Is there a passageway through the building, if so it needs to be added? Does the highway carry on to join ... |
| 51910383 by thegallaghers8 | 1 | 2017-09-10 17:38:33 UTC | BCNorwich | My apologies for not welcoming you to OpenStreetMap. Welcome to OSM!I wanted to explain that this section of Mapletree Lane which is part of St Peter's Way is included in relation (#140,533) specifically for the way. Therefore your addition of the footway is unnecessary and is also a duplication o... |
| 51909879 by thegallaghers8 | 1 | 2017-09-10 17:15:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, removed the sidewalk tag, sidewalk is beside vehicular highway. |
| 51909856 by thegallaghers8 | 1 | 2017-09-10 17:13:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, a sidewalk is a footway beside a vehicular highway so I've removed the sidewalk tag. |
| 51717841 by mirenestudioslimited | 1 | 2017-09-04 17:29:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your changset that removed a bus route relation detail by changing it to a studios details. |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 17:40:48 UTC | BCNorwich | I have tried to find the address where your studio is situated without luck, it's not on your website. If you could give an address I might be able to help get your business onto the OSM database. OSM only maps what is verifiable on the ground.Regards Bernard | |
| 50259872 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-09-04 06:32:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507335422Removed self intersection, tagged courtyard |
| 51629628 by TR42 | 1 | 2017-09-04 06:23:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 520419510Hi, I fixed a self intersection problem on this area outline. Also changed tag to fell, you state it is fell which I agree but then tag wrongly as heath. The fell tag does do something it tells the database the area is a fell area not a heath. You can render fell areas.Regards Be... |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 10:40:00 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51714984 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of poor-quality edits following discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-September/020576.html | |
| 51691340 by dflores | 1 | 2017-09-03 14:30:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've amended the building levels to two for a semi detached house. 2 living levels, 1 roof level as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildingsRegards Bernard |
| 51593242 by BaileyPumfleet | 1 | 2017-08-31 05:49:28 UTC | BCNorwich | With just a name the feature would not be rendered, I've dded the building and a few more details. |
| 51510461 by Essex_Boy | 1 | 2017-08-29 10:28:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 519344354Hi the tagging value green is not usually used with the key landuse. Can you explain what you mean and possibly amend the tag?Regards Bernard |
| 51505184 by Nastya Vyaznikova | 1 | 2017-08-28 13:46:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have changed the Westminster Abbey website back to point to the sites homepage rather than the Japanese welcome page. Like this anyone clicking on the link can choose the page/language they wish.Regards Bernard |
| 51495130 by Alexx298 | 1 | 2017-08-28 06:24:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, skate board area detail tagged to the area. |
| 51495113 by Alexx298 | 1 | 2017-08-28 06:15:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, again "Double bus stop" seems like a description rather than a formal name.If you take the information stated on the bus stop signs you can add the information so the OSM database can recognize it. How to's are on the web, also a good thing is to look at how others have formally mapp... |
| 51495077 by Alexx298 | 1 | 2017-08-28 06:06:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I wonder if "Woodslide link picnic area" is actually a name or really a description, if it's a name then each word ought to be capitalised. Same with the POI, "Woodside link Picnic benches", is this a name?Also your POI states a park as well as the area stating a park, th... |
| 51495047 by Alexx298 | 1 | 2017-08-28 05:59:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the cycleway is connected to a stream. Does it cross the stream or should it not go there? |
| 51495016 by Alexx298 | 1 | 2017-08-28 05:52:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to let you know that you've somehow duplicated parts of the footpath across Wheatfield Green. Also is there a zebra crossing over Wheatfield Rd, if so then that needs also to be corrected to OSM best practice.If you need help adjusting this please... |
| 51232331 by Essex_Boy | 1 | 2017-08-23 16:53:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 516616957 fixed several self intersections |
| 51249888 by condorman | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:18:07 UTC | BCNorwich | joined the two buildings at south |
| 51125721 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:14:43 UTC | BCNorwich | changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51125663 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:14:10 UTC | BCNorwich | changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51125644 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:13:52 UTC | BCNorwich | changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51125604 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:13:20 UTC | BCNorwich | changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51125573 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:12:57 UTC | BCNorwich | changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51125567 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:12:38 UTC | BCNorwich | changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51252057 by Jazzyfizzy | 1 | 2017-08-19 14:59:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the building is several properties frpm 260 to 270 I think. therefore I've removed number 260 from the whole building, (also corrected the postcode. |
| 51244209 by condorman | 1 | 2017-08-19 06:25:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I squared up your new buildings, (this can be achieved in iD editor by selecting the building and from the right click menu click "square". They look better by being squared off.I also terraced the semi- detached houses keeping the numbering correct... |
| 51244410 by condorman | 1 | 2017-08-19 06:09:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to point out that you have to be careful you don't inadvertently move other objects while mapping. You actually dragged a highway node (Tivoli Road) quite some distance. Not to worry though I've already reverted the change. I also made a small a... |
| 50259396 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-17 10:22:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507330969 self intersection fixed. |
| 50260083 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-12 16:40:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: Holy Family Catholic Church (507336776) fixed the self intersection of the area outline |
| 2 | 2017-08-12 16:45:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507336773 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline | |
| 3 | 2017-08-17 10:03:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507336761 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline | |
| 4 | 2017-08-17 10:08:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507336757 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline | |
| 5 | 2017-08-17 10:11:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507336755 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline | |
| 6 | 2017-08-17 10:16:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507336735 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline | |
| 7 | 2017-08-17 10:19:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507336801 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline | |
| 50807783 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-05 10:08:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580625 Fixed the self intersection of the building outline. |
| 2 | 2017-08-06 06:17:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580882 deleted duplicate | |
| 3 | 2017-08-06 06:19:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580881 remove self intersection | |
| 4 | 2017-08-06 06:19:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580883 delete duplication | |
| 5 | 2017-08-06 06:23:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580874 delete duplication | |
| 6 | 2017-08-06 06:25:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580875 remove self intersection, redraw areas | |
| 7 | 2017-08-06 06:38:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580871 remove self intersection, redraw areas | |
| 8 | 2017-08-06 06:41:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580707 remove self intersection | |
| 9 | 2017-08-06 06:50:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580696 redraw, retag | |
| 10 | 2017-08-06 06:51:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580695 deleted duplicate area | |
| 11 | 2017-08-06 06:51:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580694 remove self intersection | |
| 12 | 2017-08-06 06:54:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580801 deleted duplicate area | |
| 13 | 2017-08-06 06:55:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580800 remove self intersection, redraw areas | |
| 14 | 2017-08-06 07:06:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580796 This way is partially duplicated, has self intersection and is drawn over existing features. Not enough on bing to determine how to correct. | |
| 15 | 2017-08-06 07:19:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580825 remove self intersection and triplication of part of outline | |
| 16 | 2017-08-06 07:23:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580562 deleted duplicate area | |
| 17 | 2017-08-11 07:34:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580767 deleted duplicate area | |
| 18 | 2017-08-11 07:37:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580766 remove self intersection to separate two distinct areas from being joined | |
| 19 | 2017-08-11 08:13:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580505 remove self intersection | |
| 20 | 2017-08-17 06:03:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580624 fixed self intersection | |
| 21 | 2017-08-17 06:09:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 516287886 fixed self intersection, corrected area outline | |
| 22 | 2017-08-17 06:12:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580796 fixed self intersection, corrected area outline | |
| 23 | 2017-08-17 06:16:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580569 fixed self intersection, corrected area outline | |
| 24 | 2017-08-17 06:18:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580572 remove recreation ground which is part of mapped school ground | |
| 51126122 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-15 05:48:24 UTC | BCNorwich | Squared up outline, changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51126011 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-15 05:34:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Squared up outline, changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51126001 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-15 05:33:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Squared up outline, changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51125986 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-15 05:32:15 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Squared up outline, changed area=yes to building=yesRegards Bernard |
| 50260333 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-12 15:06:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507338139 fixed self intersection of area outlines. |
| 50137086 by Dragonmaster306 | 1 | 2017-07-09 05:58:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The new line you have added to the live worldwide OSM database in Primrose Grove has no tags to describe what it is. It is therefore of no value to OSM. Further it in part duplicates the line of an existing way (a footpath). Also one branch of your way ends wit... |
| 2 | 2017-08-09 10:09:19 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so removed the duplicate, untagged way. Next visit I'll check to see if there are more paths here. | |
| 50839570 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-06 14:42:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: Station Field Allotment Site (512867524) Fix self intersection of area outline, delete duplicated section, amend area outlines to bing. |
| 50855748 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-08-05 09:03:06 UTC | will_p | I have reverted this changeset. Mapping spiral walkways and stairways is difficult and I'm sure the current mapping could be improved, however, your changes made no sense to me. You added a stairway that doesn't exist and joined up ways that are on different levels. |
| 2 | 2017-08-05 09:27:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, very sorry that's my fault, I didn't study the layout close enough. I can see now what you're trying to achieve. Thanks for reverting it.Regards Bernard | |
| 50850910 by krackers | 1 | 2017-08-05 06:18:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The area you are amending to residential is already within an existing residential area. So the new area would not normally be needed and would be deleted/replaced with the new features. However as the new features have not yet been mapped and to avoid anyone re-... |
| 50779736 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-04 15:39:05 UTC | BCNorwich | West Stow Country Park (512311336) Fix self intersection linking of areas. The country park is south of the C631 |
| 2 | 2017-08-04 15:44:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512311398 Removed duplicated area tagged as leisure=recreation_ground (ought to have been landuse=recreation_ground) | |
| 3 | 2017-08-04 16:15:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512311387 deleted duplicate building. | |
| 32505183 by mrpacmanmap | 1 | 2017-08-03 06:13:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 359424376No need to advertise your inadequacies. |
| 2 | 2017-08-03 06:13:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 359424376Deleted | |
| 14870735 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-02 15:05:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Deleted duplicated wood Way: 203731195 |
| 50754014 by luciecohen | 1 | 2017-08-01 18:14:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I don't suppose you are aware that OSM is a live worldwide database that is able to instantaneously change the characteristics of hundreds of folks maps. I hope you can realise that the live database is not the place to conduct tests. (Tests can be done off line ... |
| 2 | 2017-08-01 22:01:11 UTC | luciecohen | Hi Bernard,My apologies - I didn't appreciate the nature of the programme. Thank god I didn't do more damage! Thanks for being so polite in your response - I'll leave the site alone in future. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-02 11:12:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you want to add test data you can try https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ - it's just like the "live" site but with just test data in it. | |
| 4 | 2017-08-02 20:59:00 UTC | freebeer | Hallo Lucie,May I repeat the welcome Bernard gave...You wrote:"I'll leave the site alone in future."Please don't... Constructive contributions are always welcome, and there is a lot to be done, perhaps less in London relative to elsewhere -- but I see dozens of unresolved notes ne... | |
| 50731973 by Nic Leaf | 1 | 2017-08-01 05:43:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You somehow added two POI for YouTube, I've removed the duplicate and added the address and website. |
| 50617741 by Joyeeta | 1 | 2017-07-27 14:29:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see you may be having problems. Was there anything in particular you wanted to add to OSM? Can I help in any way?Regards Bernard |
| 48144208 by Neil Beveridge | 1 | 2017-07-27 08:22:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, reference your recently mapped footpath River Ayr Way. I notice that there are several points at which it crosses over other highways with no connection to them. Also in places it duplicates existing ways. |
| 50602065 by EntaNaeMere | 1 | 2017-07-27 06:13:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just wanted to point out that Caister Hall grounds are not a building. Nor do the grounds extend to the center of Stoke Road and Caister Lane. You've already placed the name and type of building on the building outline, these only need stating/tagging once.... |
| 2 | 2017-07-27 06:50:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Way: 393986133 is a footpath in part used by agriculture it is in the main trod out by feet, it's never been constructed as a footway. In fact for many years it was left obstructed by those responsible for the PRoW. It's actually only in the recent few years that a mark is made over the cross fi... | |
| 50582107 by MoragBirdBoxAvenue | 1 | 2017-07-26 12:44:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you inadvertently moved a bus stop, no problem though I've reverted the change. I mapped the area of your new Pocket Park and included the website. Hope that's OK, good luck. Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-07-26 13:12:33 UTC | MoragBirdBoxAvenue | Thank you, thank you, thank you! I was a bit baffled about my E10 postcode search first suggesting a location near Hampstead Heath. And as you say - I had no intention of moving a bus stop. Thanks for including the pocket park. | |
| 50376490 by freayd | 1 | 2017-07-26 06:22:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, something went wrong with the address interpolation on the High Street, south side, even numbers. Please see : http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-0.57195&lat=51.23594&zoom=17&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_nod... |
| 2 | 2017-07-26 09:47:28 UTC | freayd | Hi. Thanks for your comment, I already noticed the issue last time. I surveyed the ground once more. It should be fixed with the changeset 50582298. | |
| 50257426 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-25 10:26:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507312609 fix self intersection problem |
| 2 | 2017-07-25 10:28:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507312540 fix self intersection problem | |
| 49529854 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-25 08:43:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 500429874 fix self intersection |
| 49557818 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-25 08:39:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 500681296 fix self intersection |
| 50258949 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-24 07:45:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507325975 remove self intersection of area outline and courtyard |
| 2 | 2017-07-24 07:49:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507325954 same | |
| 3 | 2017-07-24 07:53:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507325955 same | |
| 4 | 2017-07-24 07:59:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507326037 and again | |
| 32523185 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-24 05:42:27 UTC | BCNorwich | removing several duplicated wood areas |
| 50407111 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-24 05:31:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: (508713808) delete duplicated/self intersecting outline of playground which included building |
| 50376348 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-24 05:18:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 508410491 fixed self intersection of area outline. |
| 50223952 by Amberwood | 1 | 2017-07-22 16:27:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, same problem here as with Manor Road. I've removed the duplicate and placed your new oneway tag on the existing section of Vicarage Road after appropriately splitting it.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-07-23 18:59:58 UTC | Amberwood | Hi.No problem - my first attempt at adding updates. Manor Road looks good but not sure why Vicarage Road is not showing one way at all now?? | |
| 3 | 2017-07-23 19:22:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, the section of Vicarage Road from the cycleway (just south of Manor Gardens) south to Manor Road is tagged as oneway going southwards. This is how you had tagged it. Could you refresh your browser or reload the page that shows the oneway not appearing please? Then see if the oneway appears.... | |
| 49504883 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-23 06:24:21 UTC | BCNorwich | way_id: \t500205241 fixed self intersection |
| 2 | 2017-07-23 06:26:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 500205246 fixed self intersection | |
| 3 | 2017-07-23 06:31:14 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 500205249 fixed self intersection | |
| 49505427 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-23 06:14:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Fixed self intersection on Way: 500209862 |
| 2 | 2017-07-23 06:18:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 500209558 fixed self intersection | |
| 49504992 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-23 06:16:31 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 500206241 fixed self intersection |
| 50257796 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-13 20:37:55 UTC | DaveF | Hi RowlandTo map entities with voids in the middle we use mulipolygon relations: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygonhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507315798 |
| 2 | 2017-07-22 12:24:12 UTC | BCNorwich | I've pointed out this problem (through changeset comments) to mapper Rowland many times and corrected dozens of these instances. Despite this there has been no response from Rowland and data continues to be added incorrectly. Rowland also maps land/building areas on top of existing land/building a... | |
| 3 | 2017-07-22 15:43:16 UTC | DaveF | Rowland was/is under an acknowledgement ban so unable to message via changeset, but I did receive a DM (although it didn't really address my concerns). It's surprising someone with 7K edits is unaware of MPs & his 'blitzkrieg' mapping technique of not tidying up after himself is *very* annoying. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-22 20:32:55 UTC | Rowland | Dozens is a little bit of an exaggeration, as it was once this year, and once in 2015 | |
| 5 | 2017-07-23 05:37:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Yes once this year and once in 2015 are the commented changesets.Dozens is likely an understatement. Your attention was probably only drawn to the ones I commented on (even though the comments seemed to provoke no response). The dozens of self intersecting outlines on areas (buildings, water, wo... | |
| 50224114 by Amberwood | 1 | 2017-07-22 16:12:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I looked at your alterations to Manor Road and see that you inadvertently added two more highways atop the existing ways. The best way to achieve amendments like this is to edit the existing way, this also allows the history of change to be kept intact. Triplic... |
| 50057641 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-21 06:24:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, just wanted to point out that buildings with courtyards do not have to have self intersecting outlines. Regards |
| 2 | 2017-07-22 10:25:17 UTC | ndm | See discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50257796Looks to be semi-automated import of OSOpenMapLocal items. | |
| 50398003 by Concrete Hair | 1 | 2017-07-19 13:03:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended your opening hours and address tagging to suit OSM best practice. The world will now be better informed of your business. Regards Bernard |
| 48990358 by CrossCountryApp | 1 | 2017-07-19 07:50:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, just wanted to point out that I think this is the 2016 route not the 2017 route.There are several problems with it anyway. It crosses over on itself three times. Crosses existing roads without joining about ten times. Crosses water five times with no indication as to the manner of crossing.... |
| 50320182 by castlecorbenic | 1 | 2017-07-16 11:50:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've adjusted the opening times tag to suit OSM practice (months not indicated are taken as closed), and removed house_number=.Regards Bernard |
| 50299786 by Gammer_edit | 1 | 2017-07-15 07:41:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, this way (the steps) does not join to the old railway path. |
| 2 | 2017-07-15 08:26:24 UTC | Gammer_edit | Maybe you would like to explain further instead of leaving it hanging in the air. I am a beginner. A solution or advice would be preferable. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-15 13:57:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, no offense intended, some folk don't take kindly to being offered advice. Right, I take it that the steps are intended to join the old railway. So that you have a route from the road along the path, then the steps and onto and along the railway. SatNav routing can then follow this route.\... | |
| 50205780 by Gammer_edit | 1 | 2017-07-15 07:37:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there, I'd just like to point out that for the way south from Ham you have mapped two ways (a highway=bridleway and a highway=unclassified). You've also tagged the access as (in parts) private, yes, permissive. Your new way does not join with Ham Road, and the highway=road close to Ham Road,... |
| 2 | 2017-07-15 08:21:51 UTC | Gammer_edit | The road south from Ham is a permissive bridleway on both a private and public road. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-15 13:24:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, yes I can see that but you have drawn two roads/highways, one on top of the other. Between the road junction at Ham and your mapped permissive bridleway which goes eastwards. The manner to map this is to consolidate all relevant tags on just one highway. To have two highways one on top of the ... | |
| 50285817 by The Westbridge | 1 | 2017-07-14 17:46:01 UTC | BCNorwich | No need for website tag to be duplicated. Duplicate has been removed, regards. |
| 50200322 by Lawlor Taxis | 1 | 2017-07-11 16:04:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there, it's not usual to tag buildings as landuse=residential better to use building=residential on the building and landuse=? on the area.Anyway the buildings you have retagged look like they are the old school buildings not the new houses. so the whole area needs to be redrawn.Regards Be... |
| 50152259 by Vinczente | 1 | 2017-07-09 16:54:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the drinking water is already mapped so I've removed this duplicate. Regards. |
| 50147783 by Kite8585 | 1 | 2017-07-09 14:52:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.St Pancras International Station is already mapped, the POI just a few yards away from your POI. So I have removed this duplicate.Regards Bernard |
| 50042175 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-08 07:54:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Revert changeset to regain the original history (history was lost when houses redrawn, best to adjust whats already mapped thus keeping the history intact), remove the duplicate building, redraw the buildings, properly tag addresses to conform, change ele to conform. |
| 50074162 by Provo Steel Buildings | 1 | 2017-07-06 05:57:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see your original POI has been removed from London.You are now on the correct continent and near the right city, but the POI is still incorrectly placed for that address. If you need any help please just ask, I could fix it if you wish?One other thing, why d... |
| 50054103 by BeardedBerns | 1 | 2017-07-05 16:50:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I've made corrections made to the address so that it conforms to OpenStreetMap best practice.Regards Bernard |
| 44687575 by skyegod | 1 | 2016-12-27 04:35:57 UTC | nammala | Hi skyegod,Thanks and contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind adding cricket pitch and football pitch in the Imagery. It seems to be inappropriate in the Map. Could you please confirm.Regards,nammala |
| 2 | 2017-07-04 07:18:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Descriptive names removed. | |
| 48448591 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-03 19:11:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Duplicate way removed, the original way should be amended not another way placed on top of it. |
| 48452747 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-03 19:07:22 UTC | BCNorwich | The maxwidth must refer/be connected to the highway, not a node unconnected to the highway. "Width Restriction" is a description not a name.The width must be in the correct manner (maxwidth=6'6") to be recognized.Nodes are removed as I cannot correct them. |
| 49055183 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-03 18:50:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Name corrected |
| 49055528 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-03 18:49:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Address corrected |
| 49981649 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-03 18:10:26 UTC | BCNorwich | According to their website which I've added the name is "Saracens". I've amended accordingly. Regard |
| 49982367 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-03 17:53:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, this POI has several problems, the city, postcode, street and name should use capitol letters. There is no hospital or emergency facility. There is nothing nearby named "entrance_to_surgery".I have properly added the address to Bayfield Surgery building, also added the website, s... |
| 49772047 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-02 06:57:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed duplicate building (502893780), several buildings can easily be seen here. |
| 49807303 by TRUDGILL | 1 | 2017-07-01 07:54:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed duplicated way. |
| 49807157 by TRUDGILL | 1 | 2017-07-01 07:46:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended your house and garden additions to better tie in with the way that these items are usually mapped/tagged. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-07-01 11:13:19 UTC | TRUDGILL | Thank you Bernard. | |
| 49596240 by ColinT | 1 | 2017-06-30 06:43:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Thank You |
| 49930441 by johnny5alive | 1 | 2017-06-30 06:38:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your changes/additions ref The Relay Building have resulted in the adjacent building being dragged out of shape. Also there is now a building on top of another building. I would suggest you revert your changes and try again but please properly inspect your chan... |
| 49763583 by Larkmeadow | 1 | 2017-06-23 14:52:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Did you mean to amend the name of that section? Because nothing has changed. Princes Walk needs to be split into two sections at the corner then the north section renamed. If you need help or would like it amended for you please just ask? Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-06-23 15:35:19 UTC | Larkmeadow | Hi Bernard,I cannot figure out how to make these changes!I noticed that that small section of road parallel to the main road was incorrectly shown as Princes Walk when it should be Normanston Drive. (ie The same as the main road. I know, I used to live there!) It only becomes Princes Walk at the... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-23 17:24:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Bill, I'll guide you on how to proceed with the iD editor.Highlight/select the way (road) you want to edit in this case Princes Walk.Place your cursor/pointer over the node (small circle) at the point you wish to divide the road into two sections.Right click the node, you get a drop down... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-23 17:29:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Forgot to say if you want to insert a node to split a way at another place other than an existing node. Place cursor at the position and double left click. | |
| 5 | 2017-06-23 17:59:58 UTC | Larkmeadow | Think that's done now, thanks.Much easier on a laptop than on a phone ! | |
| 6 | 2017-06-23 18:07:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Yes looks OK!Bye! | |
| 48695845 by catrionaswanson | 1 | 2017-06-22 07:39:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello,Your mapping of the Port Salford Greenway is done in a way that duplicates some highways, (particularly Grange Road, Farm Road). Is there a separate cycleway here? If not the the cycleway status should be tagged/drawn as part of the existing highway. Duplicating highways disrupts routeing on... |
| 49261631 by skyegod | 1 | 2017-06-22 06:41:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Sidewalk beside a highway a better tagged as part of that highway except if separated by a barrier of some kind. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk I've removed this footpath because mapped such it is on top of the road, makes a duplication and messes wi... |
| 49662127 by ilovejeans | 1 | 2017-06-19 12:04:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have removed your advertising nodes.There are not two shops in the middle of the street. Your business is online and does not to my knowledge have a high street outlet that could be mapped, (not even an office). Regards |
| 49319306 by Supabento | 1 | 2017-06-07 06:45:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your highway changes to their original state. Reason being that no missing road section was added, two roads were duplicated and a 20mph limit was removed.I can't actually see what you wanted to achieve but if you can explain maybe someone can h... |
| 2 | 2017-06-18 18:46:00 UTC | Supabento | When I was looking at the map it appeared that the sections I added were missing from the map. I was using the satellite view if this makes any difference? Apologies for the confusion. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-18 19:00:21 UTC | BCNorwich | No problem, does the map you're looking at look OK now? If not could you give a link to it? Regards Bernard | |
| 4 | 2017-06-18 21:32:40 UTC | Supabento | Yeah it looks fine now | |
| 27960712 by ColinT | 1 | 2017-06-16 06:26:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi Node: 3273481349 tagged as a stile is not connected to a highway therefore it cannot be determined to which way the stile is a barrier. (The barrier (stile) should be connected/joined to the way it disrupts). Regards |
| 49577143 by monospaced | 1 | 2017-06-16 06:03:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, just wanted to let you know that the park area (453552380, v2) has become distorted. Regards |
| 49571035 by Toineverd | 1 | 2017-06-16 05:55:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Can you explain your reasoning for placing a highway=rest_area here please? I refer you to :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_areaIt does not look like a conventional rest area so I'll remove the node if I don't get a comment. Regards. |
| 45179522 by andyfrizzle | 1 | 2017-06-14 06:44:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, Just wanted to point out that the way "highway=unclassifiedref=U3064" (south section) that you've added duplicates the ways that are already mapped on that route. The duplication of highways seriously disrupts any attempt by software to route over these ways.At the river y... |
| 2 | 2017-06-14 13:21:19 UTC | andyfrizzle | BCNorwich, Thanks for the feedback. I've reviewed and hopefully correctly amended the highways. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-15 16:58:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Andy, I have a few concerns about these edits.You have changed this way from a track to unclassified and included the surface=unpaved, in the UK it is reasonable to expect an unclassified road to be surfaced, I believe that unless it has been surfaced it should have been left as a track.What ... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-15 18:17:51 UTC | andyfrizzle | trigpoint, I dont want to start an argument of any sort, but it was my understanding that contributors to the OSM project should make their contributions as accurate as possible, and that has been my intention, based on facts.The road, edited by myself, is an unclassified road, lawfully usable b... | |
| 5 | 2017-06-16 11:51:40 UTC | SK53 | This does indeed appear to be classified as an unclassified road by the county council. There will always be edge cases where the rules-of-thumb fall down, and this is one of them. I don't believe that it should be mapped as such on OSM: highway=track is much more appropriate. A couple of important ... | |
| 6 | 2017-06-16 11:58:07 UTC | Richard | highway=unclassified, surface=unpaved is ok but slightly unidiomatic for UK mapping. There's nothing wrong with it per se - there are lots of dirt roads in the States mapped that way, for example - but it's slightly unexpected in a UK context where highway=unclassified isn't used by custom for such ... | |
| 7 | 2017-06-16 12:05:46 UTC | SK53 | *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org | |
| 8 | 2017-06-16 14:03:04 UTC | andyfrizzle | Thanks for the further input, I have no problems making the amendments as suggested prior. Northumberland has a vast network of unsurfaced unclassified roads with vastly varying roads surfaces. I would not be surprised is there are more than a hundred in this county alone. I will try and work throug... | |
| 9 | 2017-06-16 14:22:24 UTC | SK53 | Thanks Andy. I've added this to the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#Unpaved_Country_Roads. It's largely based on the discussion here, but I should also add some examples from Northumberland too. I think pressure of use in SE England, Peak District etc has l... | |
| 49453088 by Petko Delchev | 1 | 2017-06-12 06:18:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed your residential area (Cardea) from because it was within another residential area (duplication), I've added a new place=suburb (Cardea) to reflect your new residential area. |
| 49347901 by Alex_Bear5 | 1 | 2017-06-08 06:14:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just wanted to let you know that if you zoom in the houses can be drawn with more precision and therefore more detail, then square the corners up. You end up with a beautifully rendered map.If you need any help please just ask, Regards Bernard |
| 49330466 by thebeaumont | 1 | 2017-06-07 10:36:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, please be advised that your hotel is already mapped to the OSM database, thus the new POI is remove as it is a duplication. |
| 49136116 by essexwebstudio | 1 | 2017-06-07 06:09:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've updated your tag information to conform to OSM best practice. Regards |
| 49048106 by Theo Goyvaerts | 1 | 2017-06-07 05:50:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, your new information tourism=attraction has been added to the existing mapped features, the duplicate features therefore unneeded are removed. Regards |
| 49302884 by Zayd9 | 1 | 2017-06-06 13:03:20 UTC | BCNorwich | It may be used as a park but it is officially a registered common. |
| 46228521 by SomePlaceMapperCT | 1 | 2017-06-06 06:37:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I think something might have gone wrong with the grass, heath and residential areas, (squared off and now have self intersections on the outlines). Regards |
| 49213798 by senior800 | 1 | 2017-06-03 08:10:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've added back the landuse=recreation_ground tag to Ketts Park. The park is a recreation ground and indeed Ketts Park is a Community & Recreation facility.An area can have several descriptive tags (a landuse and an amenity tag).Regards Bernard |
| 48788012 by jimmyrocker | 1 | 2017-05-18 16:59:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, can you give more details about the park the name perhaps. Because that area contains much that does not look like a park. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2017-06-01 06:26:38 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so what looks like fiction is removed. | |
| 48940122 by firststrideevents | 1 | 2017-05-28 06:22:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I reverted your recent changes to OSM because I can find nothing to verify them as available to general folk. They look like a route used by a select group and thus are not suitable for OSM. By all means please use OSM to create your own routes (and even print th... |
| 49011903 by kancelaria zabrze | 1 | 2017-05-27 05:51:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your changes because they drag some highways a long way out of position.You may not be aware of this happening. What you inadvertently uploaded to the database is immediately used to change the map used by folk all over the world. So pleas... |
| 48968375 by Sajid Khan (QUALITY DRY CLEANERS) | 1 | 2017-05-25 14:53:34 UTC | BCNorwich | This business was mapped as a POI, I have amalgamated all info on one POI and removed the duplicate. Regards. |
| 48820669 by Laurie_cs | 1 | 2017-05-25 06:53:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Did you mean for FP 60 to join onto Great North Road? because now it only goes to the edge of the wood area. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-05-27 10:44:39 UTC | Laurie_cs | Originally yes, but on reflection I will extend to the road. Local maps show the path only going to the woods, OS map shows the path going to the road. will extend and thanks for your comments. Laurie | |
| 48919218 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-05-25 05:48:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Several of the buildings redrawn without the self intersection on the outlines. Please have a look it's easy to do. |
| 48915141 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-05-25 05:36:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hatfield Police Station And Magistrates Court (495456784, v1)This is duplication and outline has self intersection, (not to OSM best practice) so removed. |
| 48913237 by Rahul Patel1 | 1 | 2017-05-23 17:03:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I removed the sidewalk tags, they are used on a footpath beside a road but separated from the road usually by a kerb.Removed several duplicated sections of path and tidied up some paths, circularised a couple of paths. Regards Bernard |
| 48761767 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-05-22 06:55:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Adjust areas, remove self intersecting section, remove duplicated areas from school. |
| 2 | 2017-05-22 06:59:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Expand abbreviation of church name. Adjust building outlines. | |
| 48836669 by londonofficechris | 1 | 2017-05-20 14:23:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you've placed the node (1689605515 105 Fenchurch St) on the party wall between two buildings. |
| 48826117 by Shanon Sycamore | 1 | 2017-05-20 05:52:23 UTC | BCNorwich | I set post code to OSM standard. |
| 48797678 by Laurie_cs | 1 | 2017-05-18 19:30:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your moving of the footpath has also dragged the roads at each end out of place. May I suggest reverting the changes and starting again. I can revert everything back as it was for you if you wish. The two roads need to be corrected as now routing is messed up. Re... |
| 2 | 2017-05-18 21:01:52 UTC | Laurie_cs | Just looked at the roads and they appear ok, but if you think they are wrong please revert all changes and I will try to move the footpath again. The Great North Road appears strange it has 3 lines connecting to each other.Laurie | |
| 3 | 2017-05-19 06:13:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, the problems with Dancers Hill Road are the same as the Great North Road. What has happened is that the path has been dragged to a new position without it being disconnected from the two roads. This inadvertently pulls the two roads out of shape by the same amount. The path has then been amen... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-19 06:15:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Forgot to say I can see what you are trying to do and could make those changes if you wish, though I'm sure you'd like to do it yourself. | |
| 5 | 2017-05-19 07:01:12 UTC | Laurie_cs | Thanks for the explanations and correction, As you rightly point out I would like make the changes, correctly, myself. This is the first one I have tried. Again thanks for your help, this is a very useful tool. I have UK Maps on my phone and they take a lot of info from the OS maps but do not hav... | |
| 48786832 by Swirlysgaming | 1 | 2017-05-18 14:54:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.You drew the park area again rather than updating/adjusting the existing mapped area. I have removed the duplication and tagged the area as park, leaving existing tags and history in situ.Regards Bernard |
| 48724108 by Сергей Гвоздик | 1 | 2017-05-16 13:27:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your POI guest house is placed in the roadway. As such and without an address, name or other contact info it is of little or no use to anyone. Could you please rectify this if not the POI will be removed in due course. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-05-17 17:11:58 UTC | trigpoint | It translates as Oli's House, suggesting that this is yet another maps.me personal marker.I am reverting this rubbish | |
| 48726525 by churchpropertyinsurance | 1 | 2017-05-16 13:11:44 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello your POI appears in the middle of a street far away from the stated address. If this is a mistake then please be advised that the POI has been removed so you can try again.In which case help is offered if you need it, just ask.If however this is just crude advertising (which it looks like) t... |
| 48711831 by lyut | 1 | 2017-05-16 06:09:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello you inadvertently added a highway=footway tag to the outline of part of a residential area (making it the longest footway I've seen). I have now removed the footway tag. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-05-16 07:55:17 UTC | lyut | Thanks for spotting that, silly mistake on my part. | |
| 48692464 by DGGteal41 | 1 | 2017-05-15 07:56:03 UTC | BCNorwich | If your changeset statement is correct then you've placed this POI in the wrong position. That hotel is south of here. Regards Bernard |
| 48679239 by Pierrick Gatellier | 1 | 2017-05-14 19:12:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I can find no reference to a government office of this name and the area is residential. Could you please give more information, address and point to the actual building. Thanks. |
| 48660987 by boogasm | 1 | 2017-05-14 05:41:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your leisure centre building outline is lacking in detail compared with the background image. It is also a duplication, thus I have removed the duplicate taking care to transfer your address tags onto the original building. Regards Bernard. |
| 48646265 by Hypersupremacy | 1 | 2017-05-13 14:22:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Reverted your change. Byron's Pool is a local nature reserve, please see the tagged webpage. There are numerous County Council references to the nature reserve, none state as being a park. |
| 48575856 by PeppyPupper | 1 | 2017-05-12 06:47:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, in the absence of a oneway tag it is implied that there is not a oneway restriction. Thus the oneway=no tag in (except in exceptional cases, please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway) is not actually needed. |
| 2 | 2017-05-12 20:43:26 UTC | PeppyPupper | Thanks again, should I add another changeset to revert the oneway changes? | |
| 3 | 2017-05-13 05:54:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, as you can see from the link the oneway tag is to be avoided unless it is needed to avoid other errors. It would actually do no harm if left. But best practice though would be to remove the oneway=no tags thus avoiding unnecessary bloat on the database. If you need any help please just ask. Re... | |
| 48618656 by Hitsyboy | 1 | 2017-05-12 14:03:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Regarding the POI for a park you added, a POI is not really good for an area so I took the liberty of adding the area outline as best I could from Bing image. Secondly it's a private garden rather than a park, tags adjusted to suit garden. Regards |
| 48017837 by Rohit Sharma5 | 1 | 2017-04-22 05:51:15 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Firstly your new node/POI for the Nisa Local is placed on the street, (not very precise). Also there is a Budgens shop mapped as the nearest building. Has the Budgens store been replaced by Nisa? If so then it would be better to remove Budgens details and repla... |
| 2 | 2017-05-12 07:15:12 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so removed | |
| 48602863 by Sam Lewis | 1 | 2017-05-12 06:59:49 UTC | BCNorwich | The larger area is encompassing yourpark area is already mapped as a recreation ground. Thus the park area (which actually looks like two football pitches) is incorrect. better to map the pitches. |
| 48575605 by PeppyPupper | 1 | 2017-05-12 06:41:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi you duplicated these bus stops. I've removed the duplicate checking that your shelter tag remains. |
| 2 | 2017-05-12 20:40:13 UTC | PeppyPupper | Thanks! I was using the StreetComplete app and was a bit suspicious when I had to fill in the same information twice (for each stop). Probably just some rough edges. | |
| 48603858 by WoolwichCommon | 1 | 2017-05-12 06:06:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the full common area is already mapped so I've removed the duplicate. |
| 48584503 by Stueyh111 | 1 | 2017-05-11 17:14:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the area was already mapped so I've removed the duplicate area. |
| 48574686 by Clickers1710 | 1 | 2017-05-11 06:37:12 UTC | BCNorwich | Please see board by entrance and websites for description of area, it is not a park, it is described as a playing field therefore recreation ground. |
| 48545383 by Sndrpll | 1 | 2017-05-10 06:07:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I've removed your duplicated POI from street center (correctly placed POI inside building line to SSE). |
| 48503542 by Naomi Pillow | 1 | 2017-05-08 18:07:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed fiction bench and rest areas fro middle of street and taxiway. |
| 48503016 by Naomi Pillow | 1 | 2017-05-08 18:07:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed fiction bench and rest areas fro middle of street and taxiway. |
| 48498934 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-05-08 17:26:40 UTC | Robert Whittaker | I think something's gone wrong with your edit here to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112289834/history -- should it just have been changed to landuse=farmland? |
| 2 | 2017-05-08 17:45:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, sorry yes, slip up clicking the mouse. I thought I had found all of them. Extra tags now removed. Regards Bernard | |
| 48498771 by paul_plumz | 1 | 2017-05-08 12:21:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, a way can be a track and a bridleway at the same time. |
| 2 | 2017-05-08 12:24:12 UTC | paul_plumz | I am sure it can, but it is classified as a bridleway on OS Maps and is not passable in a car from the Kettering Road to the top of Badsaddle woods | |
| 3 | 2017-05-08 12:36:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi that's OK, then it can be tagged motorcar=no which means no public access by car, leaving general access as access=agricultural. | |
| 4 | 2017-05-08 12:59:24 UTC | paul_plumz | OK - Sorry new at this, so if a bridleway is on a farm track then you classify it as a track with a designation as public_bridleway and set motorcar=no?Just trying to get all my local tacks onto OpenStreetMap | |
| 5 | 2017-05-08 15:29:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi no cause to be sorry and please don't be put off by this. I'm still learning after several years.Yes to your question and because it's a farm track access=agricultural is very specific as to the allowed access. You can tag ways of any sort with specific access and or restrictions. By no means a... | |
| 48494779 by Scuba Tech | 1 | 2017-05-08 11:01:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.On it's own a name does not give any information to the public. So I've taken the liberty of adding to your POI.Regards Bernard |
| 48489431 by Alan Saturnus | 1 | 2017-05-08 06:41:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Postcode presentation corrected |
| 48488363 by Megglesworth | 1 | 2017-05-08 06:37:40 UTC | BCNorwich | There is a hotel at that address (to the south) but not in the middle of the river, unless you've booked a water bed and it's slipped its moorings. Anyway this node remove as obviously a mistake. |
| 48487311 by Treacher Browne | 1 | 2017-05-08 06:28:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Confusing with two different names. Can you confirm the change to Co Op Local? I've put a note on OSM asking for local confirmation of change. |
| 47292648 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-05-07 21:46:10 UTC | Bunkys | Hi, Just trying to work out where the new wing of this hospital has gone and whether there was some problem with mapping (relatively new user)? Not sure how to track down changesets but yours seems to be the last edit? |
| 2 | 2017-05-08 05:56:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I made several minor alteration/tweaks to the building outline and somehow inadvertently removed that section. It is now reinstated, copied from a temporary reversion. If I remember correctly I think I was concerned about if that wing joined onto the main building (the east west section), I h... | |
| 48463111 by LessExciting | 1 | 2017-05-07 06:48:59 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.For the bridleway there is a discrepancies between what is mapped in OSM and what appears on the Ordnance survey map. I think an on the ground survey is required. Even if the definitive line cannot be used it is still a highway.For the gate again the same dis... |
| 2 | 2017-05-07 07:56:04 UTC | LessExciting | Thanks Bernard. In regards to the first change I haven't seen this on the ground but the connection between the bridleway and the track is visible on satellite so I'd thought I could extend it. The gate change I wasn't sure about. I've been on the ground there and the gate isn't really passable ... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-07 08:30:04 UTC | BCNorwich | *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org | |
| 48451974 by 73pickles | 1 | 2017-05-06 17:03:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to point out that it is recommended to map the footway/sidewalk as a property of the street if the sidewalk is just attached with a kerb and not separated by a road verge or other barriers.Regards Bernard |
| 47778714 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-05-06 14:37:14 UTC | trigpoint | Hi BernardNot sure if you looked through the history of this object but it was changed to a park, from a village green, by Doily17. I suspect this is pokemon related and should probably to put back?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-05-06 16:53:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Phil, I actually only adjusted the outline to better reflect what I saw on the Bing image regarding the street car parking. A well known web site shows the area looking much like a park. I've searched the web and find that Corner Pin is the old name for a much larger area to the south now buil... | |
| 48423459 by ILoving | 1 | 2017-05-06 07:52:47 UTC | BCNorwich | The area can have landuse and leisure tags at the same time. |
| 48423384 by ILoving | 1 | 2017-05-06 07:49:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The area can have landuse and leisure tags at the same time. Do you know the name? |
| 48363075 by Toni Barkhoff | 1 | 2017-05-06 06:12:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see the alteration you made to a section of the Jubilee Line is changing the layer from -3 to -5. I wonder how you came to this decision as the adjacent sections of the line remain at layer=-3, thus indicating a step of two layers? Regards Bernard |
| 48362401 by proimagestudio | 1 | 2017-05-06 06:04:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended the address and opening tags to suit OSM best practice. Regards Bernard |
| 48376017 by Nevj | 1 | 2017-05-04 06:21:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.If you are sure of the 20mph zone then the section between the two that you have amended also needs to be amended.My observation on the internet indicate that the 20mph zone is from a point about 80m south of Salhouse Road, to a point south of Lishman Road ro... |
| 2 | 2017-05-04 06:22:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Forgot to say if you need help/advice about splitting a road/way just ask. | |
| 47778747 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-05-03 22:25:48 UTC | tomhukins | The County Arms closed several years ago and was converted to flats. I haven't visited this area in a few months but I'd be very surprised if it has reopened. Can you confirm this is the case? |
| 2 | 2017-05-04 05:47:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there, The pub is tagged disused=pub, (your tag of 2010). Then doily17 added back the tag amenity=pub on 13-4-17. I initially only re-positioned the node 14-4-17.I've now amended the tag amenity=pub to disused:amenity=pub. There should now be no confusion, disused stated twice.Regards ... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-04 19:26:33 UTC | tomhukins | That makes sense, but I still don't understand why you would move a node when you seem unfamiliar with what's there. | |
| 4 | 2017-05-04 19:28:19 UTC | tomhukins | Also I never recall Greene King operating the pub, and the Wikipedia tag seems irrelevant. I'll fix this. | |
| 48367816 by AISSAOUI Tayeb | 1 | 2017-05-03 16:10:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've tidied up the buildings and removed the fiction parks. |
| 48308755 by DarrenAnderson1982 | 1 | 2017-05-03 06:04:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed duplication of the street. What is the area, unless stated it is meaningless? |
| 48308434 by DarrenAnderson1982 | 1 | 2017-05-03 06:01:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello you made several duplicate ways of some of these footpaths, (either doubling back when drawing a way or actually drawing the new way on top of a section of already drawn way). I think I've removed all duplicates. Duplication thus fouls up routeing. Regards Bernard |
| 48338178 by Ben Patel | 1 | 2017-05-02 16:12:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think you got a bit awry with your first mapping. I've removed the address tags from Oak Drive and reverted it back to an unclassified highway, (it's not residential as you tagged it).Also I've added the address for Simonds onto the building outline so folk w... |
| 2 | 2017-05-03 07:42:22 UTC | Ben Patel | Hi, Thanks for the help and the amendment. | |
| 48282474 by anishj | 1 | 2017-04-30 17:18:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Mapped as they are your three premises are taken as being the whole building (top to bottom). It is more usual for this type of premises to be on the ground floor only. Thus one would tag the whole building with tags indicating the main purpose of the building, p... |
| 48285979 by Andre01 | 1 | 2017-04-30 17:02:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your crossings are not done to OSM standard practice and as such do not make much sense. Please read up a bit on how to add data to OSM before making more additions. You could even look at how similar features have already been mapped.Your additions so far ... |
| 48088353 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-04-30 06:37:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, heck of a lot of self intersections on lots of these water way outlines, also some do not take account of existing water features (streams) or paths. Please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/m8h54pe |
| 48226194 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-04-30 06:27:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Rowland, just wanted to let you know that you've made a lot of self intersections to some of these building outlines. (Some joined at corners where they should be separated, others have outlines joined to courtyards.) Please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/kbkwt69 |
| 47679249 by Asher Alderete | 1 | 2017-04-12 06:21:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think you have placed this node incorrectly. Guest house in middle of road, different street? Just ask if you need help. Regards |
| 2 | 2017-04-29 10:59:32 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so node removed | |
| 48173003 by Zak Rogers | 1 | 2017-04-27 07:07:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, There's no need to remove descriptive tags for areas when you make amendments. If the tag is still relevant please leave it. I've reinstated several tags you removed as they are still relevant.Regards Bernard |
| 48176273 by Will Johnson | 1 | 2017-04-27 06:29:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for your first additions to OSM. Just a couple of adjustments I've made.The node you moved from the road-side to the hall is actually a bus stop named Village Hall, I've moved it back. I've made several additions to the hall including address, website,... |
| 48164442 by PMWheeler | 1 | 2017-04-26 15:48:44 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The circumference key is used to describe the circumference of a tree's trunk (if no unit is given metres are assumed,) at the height of 1 metre above ground. That makes your tree a giant!If it helps 110 inches = 2.8 metres.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-04-26 15:54:33 UTC | PMWheeler | Ah! Thanks I was working on assumption of cm. Wasn't immediately obvious what units circumference was in. | |
| 48147282 by creativebiolabsrelated | 1 | 2017-04-26 05:37:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted (changed back to original state), your changeset, which added advertising and other fiction to an existing highway linked to several routes. You are welcomed to add your business to our live (best in the world) worldwide database but please take... |
| 2 | 2017-04-26 05:43:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I now see your company is in the USA. You made alterations to Ramsey Road in Dovercourt England. How could you get it so wrong? | |
| 47795335 by Norma_O'Connor | 1 | 2017-04-24 14:19:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, Just wanted to let you know that you've inadvertently placed "Way: Buildings (486821331)" on top of existing buildings, or something went wrong. Also that area way has self intersections to the outline. Regards |
| 2 | 2017-05-15 16:33:18 UTC | Norma_O'Connor | Hello, Thank U for your comment : ) Camden Fort Meagher is a Classical Costal Artillery Fortification dating form the 16th Century, currently a Tourist Attraction. I was trying to capture the changes, modifications and additions to the buildings and site throughout it's long history including the... | |
| 48074951 by Abdullah Babu Kalam | 1 | 2017-04-24 05:53:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think you are mistaken with the guesthouse POI. Number 16 Hartley Ave is on the other side of the road and further north. Also I think East Ham (which is the area) is possibly not the proper name of the guest house.Could you please rectify this problem? Tha... |
| 48024799 by Dave x Smith | 1 | 2017-04-22 13:19:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've remove the turning circle from the grass area. Would you like to position it again please. |
| 47847974 by Helarctos03 | 1 | 2017-04-22 07:33:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Made several amendments mainly to preserve/reinstate previous mapping. |
| 48010014 by orizuru | 1 | 2017-04-21 19:49:41 UTC | BCNorwich | minor adjustments to conform |
| 47984936 by Smilehunni | 1 | 2017-04-21 06:03:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've taken the liberty to capitalise the names of the two areas you added. I've have removed the residential area you added because it was a duplicated area,(the whole of Littleport is mapped as landuse=residential), so this area was residential within resident... |
| 47887804 by jamie_nx01 | 1 | 2017-04-19 15:21:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed sidewalk tag, sidewalk is a footway beside a highway. |
| 47916868 by London Essex | 1 | 2017-04-19 07:10:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Tagged area as retail, remove building tag. |
| 47916528 by London Essex | 1 | 2017-04-19 07:00:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Move common from joining to road, add pond to water feature, join path to road. |
| 47844498 by Mulanlaoshi | 1 | 2017-04-18 17:51:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, it would be good to tell folk what type of shop it is, grocery, art maybe even electrical? |
| 2 | 2017-04-19 05:59:06 UTC | Mulanlaoshi | Great suggestion. Thanks. This was my first experience of Open Street Maps....didn't think anyone would notice : ) | |
| 3 | 2017-04-19 06:27:14 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, no problem and thanks for considering the advice.There's a lot of folk who would make mischief of something they can easily manipulate. Hence some OSMers glance at new folk editing and give advice when appropriate (or rectify mistakes). I've taken the liberty to amend your opening hours tag to... | |
| 47844527 by Mulanlaoshi | 1 | 2017-04-18 17:54:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed the duplicate postbox |
| 47827723 by Gambitman | 1 | 2017-04-18 13:16:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Dallington Park is a recreation ground |
| 47881388 by mdcambridge | 1 | 2017-04-18 13:06:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for your addition to the OSM database. Unfortunately you were not aware that the original section of way could be separated and renamed. Placing a second way atop the original way inadvertently created a duplication of ways. I have separated that section o... |
| 2 | 2017-04-18 14:42:16 UTC | mdcambridge | Many thanks! (I had only one thing to edit!), but there is more: Fowler Way actually extends to the left and parallels Dobson Way. It is also inaccessible like parts of Dobson Way due to construction. I will try to find the name of the road running roughly N/S that parallels pychard, which is also u... | |
| 47847032 by Helarctos03 | 1 | 2017-04-17 07:37:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed duplicate ways, amended lots of tags that did not properly describe the features, amended several area outlines, preserved previous mapping. |
| 47826849 by Silverhaze442 | 1 | 2017-04-16 17:33:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed water tag it's on the relation. |
| 47837174 by It's Matthew | 1 | 2017-04-16 14:13:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, can you say how you know this is a designated public footpath please. The way may well be used as a footpath but a "Designated Public Footpath" (Right of Way) carries a legal status which ought not be incorrectly stated. Regards |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 14:14:49 UTC | It's Matthew | The footpath signs are a good indication 😂 | |
| 47808704 by Tom Shorey | 1 | 2017-04-15 15:28:37 UTC | tomhukins | Hi, thank you for improving OpenStreetMap. I notice you've added a "building=Lemonade_Building" tag to the Barclays branch. That's an unconventional value for the building tag: the commonly used values are listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building?uselang=en-GB |
| 2 | 2017-04-15 17:01:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Amended Barclays address | |
| 3 | 2017-04-15 18:26:21 UTC | tomhukins | BCNorwich, it looks like you've removed the building tag altogether. I expect this is because it exists on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313501588 so I wonder if it makes sense to tag the address there. There's also https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4794857689 which repeats the building's nam... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-15 18:58:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, yes the building tag is there as building=apartments (18 levels), the bank is just one of those levels (level=0 is ground floor). The POI is needed if you want the building name to show in rendering (the building name in the banks tags is part of the address tagging, which is not rendered).I t... | |
| 5 | 2017-04-15 19:02:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Second thoughts. The building name could go on the apartments outline as name=Lemonade Building which will be rendered. Thus the POI can be removed. | |
| 47813749 by Tom Shorey | 1 | 2017-04-15 17:08:35 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Welcome to OSM.If way 46858846 goes under or through building 416561610 the the section through the building should be a tunnel also wuth a layer tag. If you need help please just ask. |
| 2 | 2017-04-18 08:59:50 UTC | Tom Shorey | Hi BCNorwich, the building over hangs the way. Is that classed as a tunnel still? | |
| 47755942 by Regon123 | 1 | 2017-04-13 20:28:46 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. May the Pokémon be with you! |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 12:58:29 UTC | BCNorwich | But it's a recreation ground not a park! | |
| 3 | 2017-04-14 12:59:31 UTC | chillly | It doesn't look like a rec. There's no sports pitches laid out on it. | |
| 4 | 2017-04-14 13:37:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, it's an area for informal recreation on foot, there do not have to be pitches. | |
| 5 | 2017-04-14 13:54:05 UTC | chillly | No, in English it is a piece of public land used for sports and games. The tagged space is a piece of rough ground that could not support sports and games. That may be a park, I suspect it is just grassland, it's certainly doesn't look well kept for a park. | |
| 47755554 by BigDickNick | 1 | 2017-04-14 12:45:12 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've reverted this area back to a college. Also remove the tag "park" from the college grounds. |
| 47770441 by HotWire2765 | 1 | 2017-04-14 12:06:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello I've removed landuse=retail tag from the building as it is already on the outer land area outline. |
| 47752479 by JThorpe7876 | 1 | 2017-04-14 07:13:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This is a formal "playing field" so a recreation ground/area, there is no formal park here. Regards |
| 47748933 by Cambs Geological Society | 1 | 2017-04-13 17:53:35 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Are these two points on the track really entrances to Nine Wells and are they really properly named as "Western entrance to Nine Wells LNR/LGS" and "Eastern entrance to Nine Wells LNR/LGS"?In any case the OSM database cannot render informa... |
| 47743627 by stujames | 1 | 2017-04-13 14:03:10 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detailYou seem to be a bit tangled in relations that you really don't need. Do you need any help sorting this out? |
| 2 | 2017-04-13 14:07:23 UTC | stujames | Hi, how do you mean tangled? We can lose the point if it's overkill. I'm just trying to get my block onto as many maps as possible as it isn't showing up in various databases. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-13 14:12:41 UTC | chillly | I commented on the wrong changeset, but taking the four together: The last one looks fine, the first and third use a relation to draw two parts of the building that is not needed to be a relation. The building outline could be drawn in one piece then the names, address details etc added to the outli... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-13 14:13:32 UTC | chillly | sorry, *without* the separate point | |
| 5 | 2017-04-13 15:04:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello sorry if I've blundered in. I corrected Dixie Court from the first changeset before seeing these comments. Regards Bernard | |
| 47648642 by simontaylor66 | 1 | 2017-04-11 15:26:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've placed your POI info on the already mapped outline of the park. |
| 2 | 2017-04-11 15:29:48 UTC | simontaylor66 | Thank youIs there any way to get someone to change these? It's great that someone has updated the map to include the new development, but the orientation of the development is just slightly off. For Example Drury Avenue actually runs parallel to the busway, with Pychard Road still at 90 degree t... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-11 16:11:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I'm afraid that is about as good as can be expected for the time being, unless someone local does a proper survey of the area. There is as yet no aerial imagery that can be copied and there are no GPS tracks uploaded. If you can make a good plan I'd willingly trace it to OSM. Regards Bernard | |
| 47639622 by Fouad Al Mzairi | 1 | 2017-04-11 05:43:30 UTC | BCNorwich | POI already mapped so removed this duplicate. Also added website. |
| 47510714 by a1white | 1 | 2017-04-06 16:40:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've taken the liberty of adjusting the address, correcting the postcode O to 0, changing the format of the opening hours to suit OSM convention, adding a website. Hope that helps Regards Bernard |
| 47488468 by Falacer | 1 | 2017-04-06 07:21:37 UTC | BCNorwich | I made changes to your opening hours and expanded church St to saint |
| 47431823 by angiescottcakes | 1 | 2017-04-04 07:11:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I amended your tags for name, opening-hours and description to conform to OSM best practice. Regards |
| 47021093 by Jonathan Martin Forte | 1 | 2017-03-21 07:16:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.You've placed this POI on the roadside by a little park, likely inadvertently incorrect. Features uploaded to OSM must be verifiable on the ground. It would be good if you could look at this positioning again. Or could you give more details of the florist, name,... |
| 2 | 2017-04-04 06:06:48 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so POI is removed. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-04 09:35:32 UTC | mapping man | Hi BCNorwich. Just to let you know that there is a small public garden in that POI location. It is paved with an ornamental shrubbery in the centre and benches in a circular pattern on the outside. I think Jonathon must have used the wrong POI. | |
| 47413912 by Funktious | 1 | 2017-04-03 16:58:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.With respect I have reverted your change-set as this area is predominantly trees thus woodland. Although the grass and wooded areas of the campus are used as recreation or parkland there is no formal park here, (with the exception of Earlham Park). |
| 47240355 by John Embrey | 1 | 2017-04-03 07:16:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've redrawn your grass areas that were over roads and self intersecting. |
| 47261455 by Martin505 | 1 | 2017-03-29 16:57:31 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately you introduced a duplicate way with this addition by placing it atop the existing highway. I have removed the duplicate wayRegards. |
| 47227212 by alinarosemary | 1 | 2017-03-28 13:46:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately you placed the new pedestrian highway on top of and along several trunk roads. Making in effect a duplicated way. Thus I have reverted (removed ) the new pedestrian way.If it was your intention to mark up a map for running/walking then OSM is n... |
| 47203636 by Epping Forest Taxi | 1 | 2017-03-27 17:44:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This is a Public Right of Way please don't delete any of it. It may be inaccessible to vehicles, that does not matter. |
| 2 | 2017-03-27 17:51:04 UTC | Epping Forest Taxi | Nobody is asking for it to be deleted, just for it to be marked as a pedestrian path; not normally accessible for vehicles. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-27 18:49:40 UTC | BCNorwich | OK, you had actually deleted the northern section, I now realise this must have been an inadvertent action which I've rectfied. The history of the change is still intact if you wish to view it. | |
| 47202771 by MudgePJ | 1 | 2017-03-27 15:11:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.A board walk needs to be tagged with bridge=boardwalk for it to be correctly represented. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3DboardwalkRegards |
| 47202543 by MudgePJ | 1 | 2017-03-27 15:10:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.A board walk needs to be tagged with bridge=boardwalk for it to be correctly represented. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3DboardwalkRegards |
| 47199257 by darrensilk3 | 1 | 2017-03-27 13:59:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reversed the change to the hotel as the relation area was already in the database, (with the inner cutout (courtyard) of the building). |
| 47165477 by hapy12 | 1 | 2017-03-26 05:44:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You have inadvertently placed your new space 'park' in the middle of a road which is obviously incorrect. I cannot see any place around here that could accommodate a new park so I've removed the POI.If I can help in any way to locate the park please just as... |
| 47079055 by lk07 | 1 | 2017-03-23 07:03:59 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, there are now several area named "Kidbrooke Village". I doubt if this large area is one apartment build, rather it could be several buildings. From the quoted website "Kidbrooke Village" is a name given to the whole area.Regards Bernard |
| 47078989 by lk07 | 1 | 2017-03-23 06:53:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to point out a couple of things.I wonder if "Sutcliffe Park Walkway" is a proper name given to all of the footpaths and if this is verifiable on the ground? (Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability).Secondly the... |
| 47065049 by mooselon | 1 | 2017-03-22 13:40:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended the opening hours tagging to suit that required by OSM, removed your description tag as that's really blatant advertising and is on your tagged website anyway.That leaves the following two problems that you need to address :-payment:credit_card... |
| 47058409 by rayand | 1 | 2017-03-22 07:22:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.So is that now a single building all with the address that was/is on the original part of the building? If so then the two building areas should be merged into one single area with the address. I could do this if you wish. Regards |
| 47037529 by Bluegates | 1 | 2017-03-21 14:43:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, if the road is closed that would not make its name Road Closed, so I've removed the name tag. |
| 47027729 by Steven Paul Candlin | 1 | 2017-03-21 07:33:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. The info in the fire station POI you added is already contained on the amenity=fire_station area outline. I've removed the extraneous POI which no extra data.Regards |
| 46707983 by Chris R J Lamb | 1 | 2017-03-09 18:36:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, I think you have accidentally made a circle of Sandon Green park. If you need help altering it please just ask |
| 2 | 2017-03-20 08:23:45 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so I've adjusted park outline to bing. | |
| 46851565 by Terry Stapleton | 1 | 2017-03-14 20:49:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately an addition in this manner is of no use to anyone including yourself, it just won't show on any map. If you draw your house outline, tag it as building=house (maybe add the address) that will be able to be rendered on a map. Otherwise this node ough... |
| 2 | 2017-03-14 23:36:18 UTC | Terry Stapleton | I'm new to this please delete node asap | |
| 3 | 2017-03-15 06:51:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi thanks for responding, the node is deleted. Please just ask if you want any help.Regards | |
| 46826236 by georgebruv772 | 1 | 2017-03-14 07:21:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed fiction |
| 46824297 by Iainrobert Ennis | 1 | 2017-03-14 07:09:56 UTC | BCNorwich | More details and better positioning would help. |
| 46827302 by Cristian Sebastian Arques | 1 | 2017-03-14 06:58:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your changeset because all the tourism=attraction features you added are already mapped, (the tags are on the actual features). By the way you had made several spelling and capitalisation mistakes.Regards |
| 46774788 by Meindratheal | 1 | 2017-03-12 07:18:14 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Our aim is the best map possible, we strive to help new mappers understand best practices learnt from years of experience. Please take these comments as trying to help not hinder.In deleting the park and drawing it again you have removed the mapping history o... |
| 46758489 by Qafir | 1 | 2017-03-11 13:52:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The land this building is on already has a landuse=residential tag therefore the building does not need a landuse tag at all. I have changed the building tag from building=yes to building=residential. If/when the building is mapped as separate dwellings each can ... |
| 2 | 2017-03-11 15:14:35 UTC | Qafir | Thank you. I'll keep this in mind for all further edits. | |
| 46756210 by buycustomessays | 1 | 2017-03-11 08:41:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Features mapped to OSM must be verifiable on the ground (the whole idea of a map is to guide one to a place/feature on the ground).I cannot ascertain a proper address for your company, (it is not in the middle of Barbel Street), so I have removed the POI. If ... |
| 46738791 by Mrquent | 1 | 2017-03-10 14:50:01 UTC | BCNorwich | This is a park, your fiction is removed. Please don't mess up a live worldwide map. It spoils it for everyone including yourself. Thanks! |
| 46737943 by Marianaolivo35 | 1 | 2017-03-10 14:45:24 UTC | BCNorwich | Are you sure that is a hotel, or is it just a room rental?? |
| 2 | 2017-03-10 15:13:39 UTC | trigpoint | Airbnb are private homes and have no place in OSM, I am reverting this | |
| 46733121 by waltonator | 1 | 2017-03-10 14:23:56 UTC | BCNorwich | I tagged it as building=house now it will show. |
| 46722984 by cdouse | 1 | 2017-03-10 07:45:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Dubious name removed and pool outline corrected. |
| 46722934 by cdouse | 1 | 2017-03-10 07:43:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed the fiction name. Is this really in your front garden or down the road a bit? |
| 46721201 by toady1 | 1 | 2017-03-10 07:35:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello could you give an indication as to the memorial dedication please? Is it for the Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Hospital? If so the site of the hospital building is on the corner of Church Way and Euston Road and maybe the POI is not exactly placed. |
| 46721126 by toady1 | 1 | 2017-03-10 07:20:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Info on these nodes already exists on the park area outlines. So nodes removed as its unnecessary duplication. |
| 46721054 by toady1 | 1 | 2017-03-10 07:18:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Info on this node already exists on the park area outline. So node removed as its unnecessary duplication. |
| 46720913 by toady1 | 1 | 2017-03-10 07:16:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Info for park name placed on already mapped park outline area. |
| 46720848 by toady1 | 1 | 2017-03-10 07:09:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have removed your new POI for the church as the church is already mapped in its correct location south of here. Regards |
| 46708099 by Chris R J Lamb | 1 | 2017-03-09 18:49:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, The Horse & Groom POI was close by, I've properly positioned it.The area you mapped you tagged as a lake and it was a circle shape, obviously incorrect so I've removed it. If you need help please just ask.Regards |
| 46708057 by Chris R J Lamb | 1 | 2017-03-09 18:39:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've positioned the church POI to over the church building according to the Bing image. Regards |
| 46715794 by JackLadlow | 1 | 2017-03-09 18:26:18 UTC | BCNorwich | The park was already mapped, I've added your new surface tag (grass) to the existing feature. Regards |
| 46714252 by Jonesy87 | 1 | 2017-03-09 18:20:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your changeset because it joined up service roads, an existing area and a new area into (linking linear and area features into one feature).If you can explain what you are trying to do maybe I could help?Regards. |
| 46705682 by La Cucina Restaurant | 1 | 2017-03-09 18:03:12 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, your restaurant was wrongly placed. I've put a POI with your data at roughly 62 Marine Parade and reinstated the crossing that was altered at your original position. Regards |
| 46241375 by dgee | 1 | 2017-02-20 14:21:49 UTC | BCNorwich | The park you have added is over a residential area. If the park is fictitious then it should be removed, (only on the ground verifiable features ought be added to OSM). If it is fiction would you therefore please remove it? Or shall I remove it?Regards |
| 2 | 2017-03-07 08:21:56 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so park mapped on top of housing is removed. | |
| 46630784 by jagevans | 1 | 2017-03-07 08:07:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to let you know that in the absence of a oneway tag OSM presumes that the is way is twoway, thus under most circumstances there not a need to tag oneway=no OSM presumes it for you.Having said that your tagging is not in fact incorrect, just unne... |
| 46196626 by SLBD | 1 | 2017-02-18 16:55:51 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMI'm not really sure what you were trying to do here. You have created an area, given it a name that looks like a road name and added something that looks like a postcode that can't apply to the whole area.I wonder if you were experimenting and didn't mean to save this to the li... |
| 2 | 2017-03-04 17:15:57 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so fiction removed. | |
| 46181961 by Zeïd | 1 | 2017-02-18 08:00:19 UTC | BCNorwich | This feature House of Abderahman is in the garden behind Foulden Road. There is not to my knowledge a hotel on Foulden Road. I suspect this is probably where you or your friend resides. You could map the house where you live, that would be OK. But this fiction should be removed. |
| 2 | 2017-03-02 07:13:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Fiction removed | |
| 46181872 by Zeïd | 1 | 2017-02-18 07:53:31 UTC | BCNorwich | This feature House of Yousef is not placed on Jade Close. There is not to my knowledge a hotel on either Jade Close nor Marble Drive. I suspect this is probably where you reside. You could map the house where you live, that would be OK. But this fiction should be removed. |
| 2 | 2017-03-02 07:12:50 UTC | BCNorwich | I have removed the fiction. | |
| 46046134 by Welshie | 1 | 2017-03-01 18:13:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, Just wanted to let you know that a section of Sandy Park Road (amended/altered in this your recent changeset) is now duplicated. There are different route relations on each part of the duplication so it needs knowledge of these to make a repair.Regards |
| 46489273 by Shraddhayuga | 1 | 2017-03-01 10:27:51 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap, your fictions have been removed. Please be aware that your uploads are spoiling the best map in the world. That means you are spoiling it for yourself as well.You've shown you are a good mapper so genuine additions to OSM will be appreciated.Regards |
| 46439854 by janeerica90 | 1 | 2017-02-27 11:42:15 UTC | Derick Rethans | Hi!And welcome to OpenStreetMap. I think you might have double drawn the road now. Would you like me to correct this? What was your intention with this change? did the road change?cheers,Derick |
| 2 | 2017-02-27 14:53:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You've actually added 4 new untagged ways each duplicating the route of Grierson Road. So I have reverted this changeset to avoid any problems of someone trying to undo mistakes.Regards | |
| 46362170 by Suzy May | 1 | 2017-02-26 08:46:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Hell, I removed way 453122534 as it duplicates part of way 476898369, it also had self intersection of the outline. |
| 46402474 by stevejd58 | 1 | 2017-02-26 06:50:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I removed your tag lanes=-2 from Hampden Way as it is meaning less, (-2 lanes is less than 1 lane, less than 1 lane is no road at all).Regards |
| 46379076 by davidbalcombe | 1 | 2017-02-25 07:59:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I noticed you changed the name of this bus stop. This POI is a bus stop not a telephone box.If your intention is to map a defibrillator then you have not done so. The phone box is not mapped, please add it as a separate POI. If it is now defibrillator position please properly map it as such... |
| 46313945 by ChrisBarr | 1 | 2017-02-23 07:37:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, hasn't the pub now been demolished, (as reported on some websites)? |
| 2 | 2017-02-23 10:26:35 UTC | ChrisBarr | Ah, yes you're right. Should the building be deleted? (Sorry, first time contributor to OSM) | |
| 3 | 2017-02-23 12:47:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, no problem. welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've added a demolished:amenity=pub tag removed the other tags but kept your note. Like this anyone thinking the pub has been accidentally deleted can see the shape and reason for removal of the amenity. When the new construction is done perhaps you could... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-23 12:52:12 UTC | ChrisBarr | I see, that makes sense. Yes will do. Thanks! | |
| 46288551 by Mike Whitton | 1 | 2017-02-21 22:15:00 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to osm. Something has gone a little wrong here, the building you have created is rather large and covers several streets. Would you like some help fixing it? |
| 2 | 2017-02-22 07:39:15 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello yes welcome.Your next changeset made incorrect alterations so I've reverted both changeset as both have problems.I researched your company and have added a POI at the building mapped as 46 Loman Street. Please check this out and adjust as necessary.RegardsBernard | |
| 46289115 by Mike Whitton | 1 | 2017-02-22 07:14:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your addition of an un-described area as it makes major alterations to mapped rail lines dragging them out of place. There are many help pages to get you started mapping. If you need help adding features to OSM please just ask. |
| 46274195 by Silver-Wanderer | 1 | 2017-02-21 13:53:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Does this site exist? I can find no reference to it! |
| 46241321 by dgee | 1 | 2017-02-20 14:09:35 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There,You've mapped the park over two buildings. Have the buildings been demolished? If so the buildings should be removed or tagged as demolished.Regards |
| 46226765 by Ines del Sol | 1 | 2017-02-20 06:56:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have removed your POI as it is already mapped. I have added your tourism=attraction tag to the existing POI as it was missing and may have led to your addition.Regards Bernard |
| 46187300 by Corinna Streiter | 1 | 2017-02-18 09:22:59 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I wonder if the guest house is really called "HOME" and if it is actually situated on the corner of a street. Could you please better place the POI and possibly correct the name? |
| 46102466 by YourCity | 1 | 2017-02-16 07:26:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, I reverted the name change from your destination/origin information because Lea Valley Lines is the name not Enfield - Liverpool Street Line.The destination and origin information is already contained in the route relation.Regards Bernard |
| 45595862 by DemBoySakz | 1 | 2017-02-15 19:16:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Revert Fiction |
| 45596602 by DemBoySakz | 1 | 2017-02-15 19:14:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Reverted fiction |
| 45445050 by limon0408 | 1 | 2017-02-15 07:33:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, i think something went wrong with Jennings Pool by the looks of it. Can I help? Can it be removed?regards Bernard |
| 45768427 by Sue12345 | 1 | 2017-02-14 14:27:35 UTC | BCNorwich | Inadvertent un-tagged mapping removed. Added back wood area to your park, the area can have two or more descriptive tags. |
| 46074135 by BPSDC | 1 | 2017-02-14 12:59:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, you haven't actually deleted the building or park, you've just removed some tags to them. |
| 46058248 by Selborne Society Ltd | 1 | 2017-02-14 07:23:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, As the areas are mapped the name Perivale Wood Local Nature Reserve appears three times on three areas. Do you think that, as the two meadows are mapped as within the Perivale Wood Local Nature Reserve, they might just have their individual meadow names. Thus avoiding repetition. Re... |
| 46043903 by dmgroom_ct | 1 | 2017-02-14 06:59:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and thanks for joining the two paths. I had alerted the new mapper to the problem with a comment on his changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46028966#map=19/52.63163/1.31219). He responded but due to your quick correction was not able to see un-joined ways. If you notice a newb... |
| 46028966 by Andy South | 1 | 2017-02-13 07:19:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The two footways are not joined to each other. Could you verify or not that there is a continuous way through on the footpath from Gas Hill to St Leonard's Road? If so then the two paths should be joined.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-02-13 22:47:21 UTC | Andy South | Thankyou Bernard, Yes there is a continuous way through. I just looked on the map and it seemed to me that the lines for St Leonards and St Michaels terraces are joined. But I'm new to this so please do correct if not. Thanks. Andy | |
| 3 | 2017-02-14 06:49:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Andy, The problem was fixed yesterday by mapper dmgroom_ct so you were unable to see the un-joined ways.No problem now and thanks for your additions. If I can help in any way please just ask.Regards Bernard | |
| 45251608 by Dyserth | 1 | 2017-02-09 08:19:31 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I just wanted to let you know that you are, probably inadvertently, making a lot of self intersection on the various types of areas you map. |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 08:24:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Also a field or fields tagged show the land usage is better described as landuse=farmland.To tag an area landuse=farm is really describing the area as a place (a farm in OSM is usually a place). | |
| 3 | 2017-02-12 16:52:14 UTC | SK53 | @BCNorwich: this latter statement is incorrect. landuse=farm predates use of landuse=farmland but got used for farmyards. It was therefore decided that a clearer distinction was needed, hence farmland and farmyard. place=farm is something different and should largely be avoided in most parts of Brit... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-12 18:43:45 UTC | Dyserth | Hi BCNorwich - I'm not sure what you mean by self intersection but I presume its where a way goes back on itself. I have no idea how you can find out which ways have this error either so am unable to check and correct them. As you can find them have you any hints?Some areas around this region had ... | |
| 5 | 2017-02-12 18:57:51 UTC | SK53 | Hi Dyserth,This tool is a good place to start (I've selected only the intersecting polygon option & pointed it N Wales): http://product.itoworld.com/map/109?lon=-0.17309&lat=51.53694&zoom=13.I wrote something about these issues a long time ago, but it might still be useful as an ... | |
| 6 | 2017-02-12 19:11:35 UTC | BCNorwich | https://tinyurl.com/j9qlv2bHello Dyserth, the above link show the geometry layer of problems in OSM mapping including area intersecting points. There are several views that can be selected giving many layers of differing problems.Yes self intersections are where an area outline doubles back on i... | |
| 45946299 by markf0wle | 1 | 2017-02-09 14:20:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. IMHO one ought not to assume speed limits, it's really just guessing. Would it be possible to go there and properly survey the roads. |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 14:27:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Oh and the foot-way, are cycles allowed there? Also the foot-way is not joined to the roads at each end so software will not be able to route along it.Regards | |
| 3 | 2017-02-09 19:15:50 UTC | markf0wle | I live on this road. The speed limit isn't sign posted on the estate, my assumption was my interpretation of the highway code. I will double check & correct if nessecary.I will amend the footpath. Yes, bicycles are permitted on all the footpaths in the area to my knowledge. | |
| 4 | 2017-02-11 15:53:48 UTC | trigpoint | You have tagged Welling Road as lanes=1, is that true? It doesn't look like a single track road on bing imagery.Also 20mph areas cannot exist without signs. | |
| 5 | 2017-02-11 22:57:23 UTC | markf0wle | OK, good shout. I have corrected the lanes on Welling Rd, is 2 lanes - 1 in each direction.I have too found this reviewing the highway code, therefore the official speed limit would be 30mph as that is the last posted speed as you enter Welling Road from Brentwood Road. | |
| 6 | 2017-02-12 07:14:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Would you then correct the speed limits on the estate please? It would be wrong for OSM, (the best map in the world), to knowingly contain wrong data.Regards | |
| 7 | 2017-02-12 13:01:45 UTC | markf0wle | Done Sir. | |
| 45997812 by IreneDavid | 1 | 2017-02-11 16:42:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I really don't know how you came to map your POI so far away from Raleigh. You actually changed the address of a building mapped in Dagenham, London, UK.I have reverted the change so no harm is done here. If I can help in any way please just ask. Good luc... |
| 45977055 by 드리머 | 1 | 2017-02-10 17:15:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Pointless POI from maps me removed |
| 45965014 by 드리머 | 1 | 2017-02-10 13:55:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Dreamer. This POI "Buckingham Palace" is actually along way from the Palace.The Palace is already tagged as tourism so no extra tag is needed there, would you please then remove inadvertent POI?Your POI "Greenwich" is not needed either as the place is already mapped, ... |
| 2 | 2017-02-10 17:06:19 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Brian, I have reverted both of these changsets,Maps.me users are very unlikely to respond and maps.me is not capable of changing or removing anything. | |
| 45970973 by 드리머 | 1 | 2017-02-10 13:48:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Dreamer. This POI "Westminster Abbey" is actually along way from the Abbey.The Abbey is already tagged as tourism so no extra tag is needed there, would you please then remove inadvertent POI? |
| 45941061 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-02-09 10:20:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Bernard,Did you even look at the underlying features that you made changes to here?The way that you have edited https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151615229/history started out as a wood (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/lNO ) and was changed to a duplicate park by a Pokemon mapper in https:... |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 11:37:57 UTC | BCNorwich | I have reverted the changeset. My apologies for not having any idea what you were doing. | |
| 45924084 by FreddyMills | 1 | 2017-02-09 07:26:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It is the usual practice, if a building is single occupancy (serves a single purpose/company), to place the address information on the building outline. This practice can be seen/noted in several of the nearby mapped buildings. I see you've done several te... |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 09:44:59 UTC | FreddyMills | Hi, yeah sorry about this basically I'm trying to use MapBox to do geocoding requests on points I add via the OSM API, but they don't seem to appear immediately in their maps. I was just leaving a point somewhere I thought wouldn't cause problems overnight to see how long it takes them to pick up ne... | |
| 45855040 by LoganSBT | 1 | 2017-02-07 19:38:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Reverted you additions as they duplicated themselves, duplicated existing mapped ways and were drawn across houses.Please just ask if you need help adding something to OpenStreetMap. We're always willing to help new mappers improve the live worldwide map rather than corrupt it. |
| 45835914 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-02-05 18:33:13 UTC | DaveF | Why have you deleted the building? |
| 2 | 2017-02-05 18:42:16 UTC | BCNorwich | I beg your pardon my mistake. There was a duplicate node on the entrance. When I inspected it I saw the two outlines and deleted one of them. After your prompt and closer inspection I found the duplicate node. Building now restored and extra node removed. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-05 18:45:50 UTC | DaveF | Thanks | |
| 45772472 by A1map | 1 | 2017-02-03 19:53:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your change of the two bus stop names is incorrect but understandable. The names are taken from the National Public Transport Access Node (NaPTAN) database. These names are the official designated names and are not necessarily what local folk might call the bus s... |
| 2 | 2017-02-04 10:02:24 UTC | A1map | OK Bernard, understood. Thanks for letting me know.Regards Martin | |
| 45592080 by albyramon | 1 | 2017-02-01 17:38:51 UTC | BCNorwich | You are very welcome to add features to OpenStreetMap but they must be genuine. Anything else is looked on as vandalism and would be to your detriment should you ever have need to use an OSM map.Your obvious fiction has been removed. |
| 45702273 by Claudidole | 1 | 2017-02-01 14:03:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I noticed you've had several attempts at placing feature on the map. This has resulted in one untagged node being uploaded to the OSM database. As it is this has no value and should be removed. If you would like help mapping something please just ask, otherwise... |
| 45697236 by MAPSTYLE | 1 | 2017-02-01 07:54:59 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed duplicate paths, removed path names, minor adjustments |
| 45697115 by MAPSTYLE | 1 | 2017-01-31 20:51:29 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.We try to map things accurately as they exist in the real world This and many of your other additions appear to be doodles, this one is on top of a road. |
| 2 | 2017-02-01 07:38:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed duplicated way. | |
| 45696964 by MAPSTYLE | 1 | 2017-02-01 07:27:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Please take time to understand the best way to properly add paths to OSM. I've looked at all in this changeset and lots are duplication's, others illogical. In order to protect the integrity of the map, (used by folk all over the world) I've removed some obviously w... |
| 45544213 by DGMacc | 1 | 2017-01-31 07:37:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, thanks for adding these two POI but the information was already placed on the buildings. Duplicate POI info removed. |
| 45531000 by cyberheron | 1 | 2017-01-29 17:15:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed the three parks because they are mapped within an existing park. Regards |
| 45530322 by cyberheron | 1 | 2017-01-29 17:03:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the area tagged as wood is an area within the area tagged as park. Your change tagged the woods to park within a park. I've changed the tagging back to the original.Regards. |
| 45488067 by Ossama Ragheb | 1 | 2017-01-29 08:05:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap."Name=resident area" on a node does not mean anything to the database. If you want to indicate that the building is residential within that predominately retail area then you could change the tag building=yes to building=residential.Need any help please ... |
| 45487934 by deanmoriaty | 1 | 2017-01-29 07:23:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi the park you added was obviously a mistake as it was placed on top of a residential area, so I've removed it. Regards |
| 45594978 by Romulus_Tiberius | 1 | 2017-01-28 15:16:15 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have changed something named as Compton Terrace Gardens from being tagged as a garden to a park. Is this really true, or are you changing things to attract Pokémon? We want your edits but please add real stuff in the right place and described properly. |
| 2 | 2017-01-28 15:24:28 UTC | Romulus_Tiberius | I don't play pokemon. But English is also not my first language, and after just googling the difference between park and garden I tend to think that is more of a park then a garden. There's nowhere near enough plants or flowering plants to make it a garden, but at the same time maybe it's not big en... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-28 15:27:18 UTC | chillly | OK, I accept your choice. We are seeing lots of new mappers simply adding parks to play a game, that's why I asked. I hope you find more detail to add in your area. | |
| 4 | 2017-01-28 17:54:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Compton Terrace Gardens are actually gardens, they happen to be used like a park. That's why they are called and signed as gardens. Originally they were for the private use of people living in the terrace's, please see :- http://www.londongardensonline.org.uk/gardens-online-record.asp?ID=ISL02... | |
| 45578980 by jolieellaxxx | 1 | 2017-01-28 07:50:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Welcome to OpenStreetMap a live worldwide database that ordinary folk contribute to in order to make the best maps possible. Please don't add fiction for your games to the live map. There are ways that you can use OSM to make maps of your desire but what you've done here is incorrect. Thus your addi... |
| 45579014 by jolieellaxxx | 1 | 2017-01-28 07:50:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Welcome to OpenStreetMap a live worldwide database that ordinary folk contribute to in order to make the best maps possible. Please don't add fiction for your games to the live map. There are ways that you can use OSM to make maps of your desire but what you've done here is incorrect. Thus your addi... |
| 45576453 by DemBoySakz | 1 | 2017-01-28 07:36:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Adjustments to area, add/amend service and foot access, remove unnecessary tags, remove POI |
| 45529446 by mjs317 | 1 | 2017-01-27 08:07:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This footway is already mapped in that the existing cycleway is designated as segregated foot and cycle use. So I have removed the duplication.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 17:45:57 UTC | mjs317 | Thank you Bernard. Put that down to over exuberance of a new user! | |
| 3 | 2017-01-28 07:02:20 UTC | BCNorwich | No problem, need any help just ask! | |
| 45568757 by Rocky1234 | 1 | 2017-01-27 18:10:02 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. I assume this footpath is meant to connect to Wellbeck Drive? For it to be usable it does need to connect. Shout up if you need a hand. |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 19:20:13 UTC | BCNorwich | I don't think there is a footpath goes through the houses just there. | |
| 45555196 by AdrianSweetman | 1 | 2017-01-27 18:46:52 UTC | BCNorwich | All change-sets to and including this one are reverted to remove fiction. |
| 45549791 by Nobbytheboss | 1 | 2017-01-27 18:26:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Not the proper place to do testing (testing can be done without uploading fiction to the live database). Can I help you with mapping anything.Your addition has been removed.Regards |
| 45536044 by Y0uka! | 1 | 2017-01-27 18:22:44 UTC | BCNorwich | Your silly fiction has been removed. If you need help adding genuine features to OSM please just ask. |
| 45511082 by frewip | 1 | 2017-01-27 12:57:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed residential area as it was mapped inside of a residential area, duplication. |
| 45538138 by RoamingWild | 1 | 2017-01-27 12:52:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed paths drawn over established housing. |
| 45530532 by Aadambrt | 1 | 2017-01-27 08:39:30 UTC | BCNorwich | I have reverted these silly changes.You show you have a good idea how to map map properly, this is the best map in the world please don't spoil it. And we would welcome some real additions to help us and your good selfRegardsBernard |
| 45530180 by Aadambrt | 1 | 2017-01-27 08:32:16 UTC | BCNorwich | It's an informal path through the woods not a of the status you tagged it. The house is not a park. The gardens are not a park. Tagging reversed/removed. |
| 45530105 by Aadambrt | 1 | 2017-01-27 08:20:02 UTC | BCNorwich | This is actually a service road maintained by the council. Giving vehicle access to properties along it as well as access on foot. |
| 45514445 by jm350z | 1 | 2017-01-26 14:29:34 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSM.You seem to have deleted stuff and and added junk to the map. If you are trying to attract Pokémon, you are wasting your time. They only use certified parks, paths and waterways.Imaginary ones are a waste of time.I will delete this as junk. |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 14:39:00 UTC | jm350z | I accidentally deleted the funeral home. As far as junk is concerned, i tried to add waveney water garden, this was a japanese garden with many koi ponds created by my late father in law. There are still original ponds and fish at the properties. Your reference to junk is very harsh and quite frankl... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-26 14:41:38 UTC | chillly | Hmmm, what about the five houses on a private road you plonked the pond onto?I stand by junk. | |
| 4 | 2017-01-26 14:44:08 UTC | jm350z | "ponds" at the properties. Go fuck yourself | |
| 5 | 2017-01-26 14:49:38 UTC | lostmike | Map each pond separately. | |
| 6 | 2017-01-26 14:53:29 UTC | chillly | Thank you for reinforcing my initial idea. I have checked, the area covered all of the houses and gardens and even touched the main road. Maybe there were ponds there in years past, but the aerial images show only houses and gardens with lawns now. If you want to map real stuff that is present n... | |
| 7 | 2017-01-26 19:21:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Supporting chilly's decision and calm response. | |
| 45451341 by NorfWheezy | 1 | 2017-01-24 21:49:49 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMIs that really a park or are you just trying to attract Pokémon? The park (garden) overlaps the building. please add stuff carefully and only add real stuff. |
| 2 | 2017-01-25 14:37:15 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed fictional park placed atop existing buildings and private parking area. | |
| 45451551 by NorfWheezy | 1 | 2017-01-25 14:35:51 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed fictional park placed atop existing buildings. |
| 45451736 by NorfWheezy | 1 | 2017-01-25 14:33:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Adding made up places is not very helpful to a live worldwide database. Your changes are reverted. Even so Welcome to OpenStreetMap and if I can help you make a positive contribution please just ask.Regards Bernard |
| 45466308 by teebox | 1 | 2017-01-25 10:05:34 UTC | BCNorwich | With respect I think you will find that under the tree cover is a large area of water. If you haven't actually been there then please look at other maps and aerial imagery.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-01-25 10:24:49 UTC | teebox | Dear Bernard,Thank you for your comment. I do in fact live in Long Melford and frequent the Valley Trail and park regularly. Whilst I agree that there is a large body of water in the woodland area, i believe the proportions both on OSM and Google maps are inaccurate. It appears substantially lar... | |
| 45437305 by Blinkey8888 | 1 | 2017-01-24 19:54:24 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This area is actually part of Clapham Common and has been mapped as such for many years. |
| 45425774 by Adelina Mocanu | 1 | 2017-01-24 12:41:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The information contained on your two added POI (museum) is already included in full description's of each of the buildings. I have removed your two POI as it is a duplication of data.Regards |
| 45387700 by Iuliana Hutuleac | 1 | 2017-01-23 08:44:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You've placed that unnamed bank on a residential street. I don't think there's a bank close by so I'll remove the POI.If you can give more details and a better position please please make the addition and if I can help please just ask. |
| 45377360 by WorldsBoss | 1 | 2017-01-23 07:34:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've adjusted your new mapped path (separated it from the wood area outline), joined it to the crossing ways and extended it west a little to join a track (seen in the Bing image).The width measurement used in OSM is metric, did you really mean the path is 10 m... |
| 2 | 2017-01-23 19:29:20 UTC | WorldsBoss | Thank you for the kind welcome Bernard. I did notice that the measurement was in meters, but there was method in my madness haha. Although the main footpath is on the top half of the clearing where I drew the footpath, it does technically span the entire clearing. There is grass everywhere else unti... | |
| 45212412 by telmocosta | 1 | 2017-01-22 15:01:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Made several adjustments to paths, joined several to roads. |
| 45217772 by telmocosta | 1 | 2017-01-22 14:36:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Joined several ways to roads. made many adjustments to paths. |
| 45322529 by telmocosta | 1 | 2017-01-22 08:55:59 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've had a close look at the ways you've recently added to the database.I removed several bridleways as they were duplication's of existing ways and are not bridleways in their own right. I re-tagged highways where appropriate to include bridle status. I joined up an... |
| 2 | 2017-01-22 09:00:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 467433785 can you really walk that line and does it join the road at north? | |
| 3 | 2017-01-22 20:58:02 UTC | telmocosta | Yes you can walk 467433785 and it joins the road at north. although i haven't crossed that path yet. Thanks for your help, I have laid down plenty of path for my walk, I am not experienced in drawing footpaths. | |
| 44952041 by AlexJ2552 | 1 | 2017-01-06 15:35:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.There are problems with this footpath. You've not connected it to the road at south, it's drawn across a house into back gardens. Would you please look at and correct it? Need any help just ask. I can remove it for you if it's not repairable? |
| 2 | 2017-01-22 08:11:51 UTC | BCNorwich | No response, no evidence so removed way. | |
| 44953859 by mfcfrankos | 1 | 2017-01-06 15:27:31 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Well I'm sorry to say that addition has gone wrong. The footpath in part duplicates Mercator Road, then cuts twice across a building. Would you like to have a look and make corrections? If you need help please just ask, I'll await your response. If no response I'... |
| 2 | 2017-01-22 08:09:48 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so path removed. There are several footpaths around these buildings that could be added but a proper survey is needed. | |
| 45105496 by Harumi Wu | 1 | 2017-01-19 19:10:40 UTC | BCNorwich | removed fiction |
| 45292894 by Emil Ganev | 1 | 2017-01-19 18:55:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This hotel just doesn't look right. Unnamed and sitting in the middle of a street. Can you give more details and position please. If I can help please just ask. Regards |
| 2 | 2017-01-23 06:37:50 UTC | SDavies | I think I do recall seeing a hotel near here-- but at the Chingford Rd end of the street. I'll likely survey this area soon-ish so will check then. | |
| 45084589 by Sam888 | 1 | 2017-01-14 14:34:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there Sam888.Quite a few problems with the features you recently added. Would you like to have a look and maybe make adjustments, please see here :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-0.94274&lat=53.24077&zoom=13&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersecti... |
| 2 | 2017-01-18 18:25:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Two areas tagged as grass that are actually 90, 95% not grass but highway surface, are removed. Grass area was a narrow verge. Each area was also mapped with self intersection.One area remapped to remove self intersection of area outline, create areas without any self intersection, now mapped pr... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-20 00:33:29 UTC | SomeoneElse | Based on the last time I was in the area (last year) I don't think there's anything like this amount of "meadow" here. You could maybe make a claim for the bit by the cricket pitch, but it'd be a stretch. | |
| 4 | 2017-02-09 23:50:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | This was so wrong based on my recollection of the area that I've reverted it (but also tried to incorporate future changes that seemed plausible, e.g. that the main street in Milton is lit). | |
| 44846651 by Tecbarrett | 1 | 2017-01-03 08:08:26 UTC | BCNorwich | There are still many problems with your mapping. Now I see gates mapped as linear features. A gate is an impediment/barrier to a way, not a way it's self. The tag barrier=gate should be placed on a single node of either a barrier or highway, or an intersection of a barrier and a highway, please see ... |
| 2 | 2017-01-17 12:16:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Problems now rectified | |
| 44826418 by Tecbarrett | 1 | 2017-01-01 18:14:28 UTC | chillly | Hi,If the area around a property is a garden, you can (should) tag it as a garden, not a meadow. The key is leisure:garden. Only add names that are shown on signs, so a garden will not have a name:Garden tag. It takes a while to get the hang of things, but you're getting there. |
| 2 | 2017-01-01 18:20:59 UTC | chillly | There is landuse:orchard available if you're sure the site is an orchard, again that stops you misusing the name tag. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-17 08:58:32 UTC | BCNorwich | All problems now rectified. | |
| 44818791 by Tecbarrett | 1 | 2017-01-01 10:54:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM is a live worldwide database from which folk compile maps. It is imperative that the data we add is correct, factual and verifiable on the ground.You show good skills in adding features to the database. But with the exception of the two buildings it looks l... |
| 2 | 2017-01-17 08:40:23 UTC | BCNorwich | I think all problems on this changeset now rectified, thanks | |
| 45201297 by Peter Fowler | 1 | 2017-01-16 08:27:57 UTC | BCNorwich | The number suggests a triangulation pillar then type=triangulation can be added. Please see here :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_pointRegards |
| 2 | 2017-01-16 09:38:36 UTC | Peter Fowler | Sure.I am very, very new here, and I read the paragraph,> type=triangulation, > type=observation_spot,> type=fixed_point and type=benchmark > have meaning in nautical maps, where > they refer to INT-1 codes B20, B21, B22 > and B23 respectively. Note: it would be \... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-16 11:34:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | "type=triangulation" was a new one to me too... | |
| 4 | 2017-01-17 13:34:52 UTC | SK53 | type=* anything should be avoided as type really should be reserved for relations. I would agree with either of survey_point or survey_point:type as being suitable values. | |
| 5 | 2017-01-19 07:02:05 UTC | Peter Fowler | Please believe me that I had no notion how difficult I would find this. Please feel invited to fill in the correct tags perhaps from http://trigpointing.uk/trig/3033 . Further, I am not quite certain that the [wiki page that I used](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_point) is... | |
| 6 | 2017-01-19 07:18:08 UTC | Peter Fowler | I have found, on my shelves, a paper copy of sheet 122 of the Seventh Series (Melton Mowbray) published 1962. Looking at SK865065, it is between the 500 foot and 450 foot contour line, I would judge at about 470 feet, maybe a little higher. Should I add this figure, or the one from the Garmin (149 m... | |
| 7 | 2017-01-19 11:44:04 UTC | SK53 | Not to worry: somewhat surprisingly trig pillars are not that well documented. This discussion is useful for helping clarify what should be documented. By a remarkable co-incidence last weekend I also mapped a trig pillar featured on sheet 122 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4608321916), so it's ... | |
| 8 | 2017-01-20 03:39:27 UTC | Peter Fowler | OK. My map does not appear to have the spot height. The green Pathfinder 896 has metric contours and a spot height of 150 and the Orange Explorer 15 is identical. My only concern is to avoid being accused of wrongful copying of the issued data from [TrigpointingUK](http://trigpointing.uk/trig/3033) ... | |
| 9 | 2017-01-20 11:16:22 UTC | SK53 | My map is issue B/* (c) 1962, updated with PRoW and major roads 1967. I notice the map on NLS doesnt have the spot height either, and the earlier interpolated contours on the 6" and 2.5 inch OOC maps dont really agree with the spot height (http://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17&lat=52.6502... | |
| 10 | 2017-02-26 12:47:48 UTC | Peter Fowler | Thank you.I have never previously seen that map, and I agree that the land rises quite steeply from the Uppingham Road. This triangulation pillar does not seem to be shown. Had it been erected? The OS claim that their "leveling" dates from 1963. Perhaps the contour lines on the 1937-61... | |
| 45200252 by Man'n'dog | 1 | 2017-01-16 08:02:50 UTC | BCNorwich | I'm sorry but I don't think that the playing field nor the football pitch is named "Briston pavillion". The clubhouse building east of the field might be. |
| 2 | 2017-01-16 08:08:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Please don't let the comments on your first OSM mapping deter you, everyone makes mistakes (especially me). There is a lot to learn and there's lots of help on the web. If you think I can help please just ask. | |
| 45199972 by Man'n'dog | 1 | 2017-01-15 21:36:23 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSM,Thanks for the detail. We normally add a name tag when there is a sign naming something. Public Footpath is a useful sign but we add a special tag designation=public_footpath. |
| 2 | 2017-01-16 07:53:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Yes Welcome, what you've actually added is a duplication of an existing way. It's been on the OSM database for several years and is on the Vespucci map. As such it adds nothing extra to the database (except for several of your new descriptions, which I might argue about), thus it ought to be removed... | |
| 45176935 by Mais Joudeh | 1 | 2017-01-15 12:20:54 UTC | BCNorwich | This bus-stop is mapped actually some distance from the street and there is another bus-stop close by on that street. The name=studio given to the bus_stop looks suspicious as well, especially as the close by building is Studio College. So it looks like your mapping is somewhat flawed. Please re... |
| 45171756 by Happy_Daze | 1 | 2017-01-14 21:13:18 UTC | chillly | Hi Welcome to OSM,You seem to have added a footpath which meanders across a roundabout and a road. Did you mean to save this for everyone to see of were you practicing? Do you need any help with this? |
| 2 | 2017-01-15 12:07:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Yes welcome, I started to rectify the problems on some of the sections of path modified/added at the north of this changeset. Unfortunately I think the rest is better/easier if removed and started again. Then as they are pavements by the road separated by a kerb it could be better to map them as sid... | |
| 45075120 by CItizenSk8R | 1 | 2017-01-11 18:56:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Is there a physical, verifiable feature on the ground here with a verifiable name? If not then the point ought not be mapped as it serves no function. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/VerifiabilityRegards |
| 2 | 2017-01-14 19:33:36 UTC | hadw | The other issue here is that names should not be used to carry meta-data. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-15 09:31:56 UTC | BCNorwich | No response from mapper so changeset reverted. | |
| 45156201 by Just VIsit goaloo | 1 | 2017-01-14 10:09:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, OpenStreetMap is a live worldwide database from which folk compile maps. To include fiction in this database could cause disruption. You added a name to a residential area which looks highly suspicious so I have reverted the changes.If you can show the name is verifiable on the ground... |
| 2 | 2017-01-14 10:12:27 UTC | BCNorwich | WARNING the link to GoaLoo may not be safe. | |
| 45144105 by Unique Best Man Speeches | 1 | 2017-01-13 20:39:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This building is named Belmont, you've added the name "Unique Best Man Speeches" to the building which is clearly wrong. Unique Best Man Speeches is at best a company or office within the building. If it has a physical presence at all. A POI for the com... |
| 2 | 2017-01-13 20:42:38 UTC | BCNorwich | I just noticed the statement on your website "We will not spam you" OK | |
| 45141513 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-01-13 19:20:26 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Bernard, you have missed sport=soccorCheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-01-13 20:14:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Phil,No I didn't miss it, I left it for you, please see my comment here :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45139235#map=18/51.75318/0.45146, just joking. It will always be football to me! What do you think, conform or not?Regards Bernard | |
| 45139235 by VickieCherry | 1 | 2017-01-13 18:12:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello this area is the pitch. The stadium is the already mapped building to the east. I've changed the tag back to pitch.I would agree with the sport=football tag, and would use it myself, after all it is a football club. There is however a trend to call this game soccer. Regards |
| 45139148 by VickieCherry | 1 | 2017-01-13 18:01:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Could you say why you placed the POI (sculpture) in the residential relation number 2919365, as I can see no need to do this. If this was inadvertent shall I remove it from the relation (it only bloats the database). Regards. |
| 45104422 by chrisllarkin | 1 | 2017-01-12 18:15:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there, your mapping of the three fields is very imprecise as to be almost valueless. Could you please make good these areas, you can zoom right in so as to very accurately map field boundary's. |
| 45075643 by Biggles500 | 1 | 2017-01-12 07:13:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Could you have a look at your new way 465160584 (highway=unclassified), it isn't joined to the A4178 at the eastern end. Logic would suggest it should be. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-01-12 11:33:25 UTC | Biggles500 | Sorry, new to this game :)Hopefully I've now managed to join the dots up. | |
| 45065819 by MARIA LISTE | 1 | 2017-01-11 07:14:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, is the phone shop actually in the Jewish community centre? |
| 44619689 by StarsMmd | 1 | 2016-12-23 12:46:43 UTC | lostmike | Welcome to OSMYou appear to have created a park, a footpath and a lake where there was once houses and gardens. Is this accidental or have these gardens been demolished for the purpose? |
| 2 | 2016-12-24 07:29:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The OSM database is a live worldwide operation from which folk compile maps for you and I to use. So it's not a good thing to place fiction here. There are sites where you can make up your own fantasy maps but this is not one of them.I can find no official evid... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-10 10:59:19 UTC | BCNorwich | No response from StarsMmd so reverted as could find no evidence in favour of the edit. | |
| 45021086 by rowlandcrumb | 1 | 2017-01-09 11:25:51 UTC | chillly | You have added what looks like advertising to a road junction. OSM is not Google maps, we don't host adverts. If your business is nearby (it won't be in the middle of a junction) you can add it as, say, an office. If you just wanted to add an advert you need to go elsewhere.I intend to remo... |
| 2 | 2017-01-10 07:58:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, the tagging to this node can be removed as the information is mapped more fully at 173 Colney Hatch Lane to the north. This here is a duplication of part of the company information. ref :- http://www.ukbusinessforums.co.uk/reviews/rubbish-please-professional-rubbish-removal-in-london.324118... | |
| 45036594 by KieranW | 1 | 2017-01-10 07:32:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for you additions to the OSM database. Can I please draw your attention to Church Hill.You have added a short section of highway (the length of the footway) which is actually a duplication an existing way. It's tagged ford=yes and highway=service, ther... |
| 44895561 by Danny Andronic | 1 | 2017-01-04 11:10:44 UTC | Derick Rethans | Hi!And welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your note says that you live here, but then you map it as a shelter? That's for giving shelter in forests. What you want to map this at, is a building, with address information (street, housenumber, and postcode). I realize Maps.me probably doesn't allow y... |
| 2 | 2017-01-04 18:07:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've drawn in a house from Bing imagery around that node, tagged it as a house and noted that you shelter there. Please check and add any other info you can. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-09 13:18:24 UTC | hadw | I thought there was a general principle that we did not map information about private individuals. If nothing else, it creates Data Protection Act responsibilities - full redaction may be needed if there is a a complaint.Also mapping internet_access=wlan seems to me to imply at least customer ... | |
| 4 | 2017-01-09 18:23:48 UTC | BCNorwich | OK. Reverted my own changeset. | |
| 44964107 by NickRaper | 1 | 2017-01-07 08:18:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to point out that the area (please see here :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464178639#map=17/51.45434/-0.15097), you added has no descriptive tags and thus adds nothing to the database. Map compilers don't know what it is so it's ignored. Could... |
| 2 | 2017-01-08 07:10:17 UTC | BCNorwich | If you are saying in your changeset comment that this area is fenced then it should be tagged such. However please be more precise with the fence line and include any gaps, gates and the status of ways through the fence. Thanks. | |
| 44967383 by Mattjon | 1 | 2017-01-07 00:08:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello Mattjon and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Here you've changed Felix Close from being a residential road to a footpath: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428762672/history . If it really is a residential road (which the underlying OS OpenData from which it was added suggests) please don't change ... |
| 2 | 2017-01-07 10:32:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, yes welcome, another observation is that this way has ended up duplicated. When the status of the way is resolved the duplicated way should be removed.Regards Bernard | |
| 44957495 by jake mcdermid | 1 | 2017-01-07 08:34:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM is a live worldwide database, we add features ti that are verifiable on the ground for other folk to make good maps. Your addition was obviously a test or an inadvertent addition so I've removed it. Regards |
| 44938935 by JackLongman | 1 | 2017-01-06 10:52:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi. There are no footways, footpaths or pavements for pedestrians in Nightingale Close. I've tagged foot use of the highway. The ways around Scotch Hill are paths, informal pedestrian ways on a desire line. Footways are a formal way usually a pavement or sidewalk, specifically constructed for pede... |
| 44601842 by Nt28041 | 1 | 2016-12-23 08:45:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Can you be more precise as to the position, middle of the walkway doesn't really help. A name and any other details would be helpful as well. |
| 2 | 2017-01-05 14:16:27 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so removed as no information can be gained. | |
| 44921876 by Sigi Van Ginhoven | 1 | 2017-01-05 13:57:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I removed the address from the building, as it has several addresses for many areas of the building. Placed address and extra details on the POI. |
| 44903867 by jireland | 1 | 2017-01-04 18:08:55 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. This should probably be amenity=social club, bar implies it is open to the public, whereas a social club has membership rules.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-01-04 19:56:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Yes welcome to OSM. Actually the facility is already mapped and all information is on the building outline. It is tagged as amenity=social_club, so I have removed your POI so as not to duplicate the information, hope that's OK. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-04 19:59:23 UTC | trigpoint | Well spotted, the building and club outline are separate and overlapping ways. That could do with a tidy up while you are removing the node. | |
| 4 | 2017-01-04 21:02:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Sorry forgot to mention the duplicate I removed as well. | |
| 44844273 by Sam Liam Perkins | 1 | 2017-01-02 19:07:31 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Untagged way 463240250 that just goes out into a field, was that inadvertent, can it be removed? |
| 2 | 2017-01-03 16:58:21 UTC | Sam Liam Perkins | If you mean Pen Hill Lane, that was meant to be there.If you mean something else that I missed, feel free. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-03 17:00:28 UTC | Sam Liam Perkins | Oh, I see what you meant now. Stupid spindly bit I left poking off of Mill Lane. Yes, that was an accident, you can remove that. | |
| 4 | 2017-01-03 17:08:04 UTC | BCNorwich | OK, removed. | |
| 44856394 by Harumi Wu | 1 | 2017-01-03 07:34:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.These two additions look like fiction, a nightclub in a grassed park, a highway rest area in the middle of a street. You either had a very good night or a very bad one.I have removed the features, however if you can show me wrong I'll gladly apologise and put the ... |
| 44827047 by Tecbarrett | 1 | 2017-01-01 18:38:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Many inaccuracy's were left, I've repaired as many as I can easily see. |
| 44818524 by Strider712 | 1 | 2017-01-01 11:16:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately this changeset has made two highways over the same route, a footway and a cycleway. To the South East one reaches the road the other doesn't. The route across this field (as shown on the OS map) is a designated right of way being a public footpath. ... |
| 44818611 by Tecbarrett | 1 | 2017-01-01 10:54:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there, are you sure this building is named correctly? OS map has the name as Laurel Farm. |
| 44809556 by itstricky | 1 | 2016-12-31 17:19:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello several highways that you've tagged as sidewalk to one side or the other actually have sidewalks on both sides for some sections, in one case there is a section with no sidewalk at all, left or right. |
| 2 | 2016-12-31 19:28:52 UTC | itstricky | Hi BCNorwich,Thanks for the feedback. In cases where a pavement ceases and/or (re)commences, would it instead be desirable to split the sidewalk off to a separate footpath running alongside, or split the actual roadway into sections to allow for more accurate sidewalk mapping? I couldn't find guid... | |
| 3 | 2016-12-31 20:28:51 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, It's usual to split the highway into sections to accommodate changes in the highways characteristics, be that a change in sidewalk, speed limit, name change or designation etc. As for sidewalks (pavements to the side of roads usually separated from the carriageway by a kerb) it's usual ... | |
| 44809908 by itstricky | 1 | 2016-12-31 17:29:42 UTC | BCNorwich | I just looked at the mapping here and observe that one path is not joined to the highway network at either end. The other looks like it should be joined to the service road. |
| 44792085 by norfolkbroadsnetwork | 1 | 2016-12-30 19:39:35 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, changed the dyke name to South Oby Dyke. |
| 2 | 2016-12-30 19:42:10 UTC | norfolkbroadsnetwork | Ah, great, cheers! | |
| 3 | 2016-12-30 20:05:59 UTC | BCNorwich | No problem. Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've looked at your mapping, made a couple of minor adjustments which I commented on for you to see.Regards Bernard | |
| 4 | 2016-12-30 20:09:28 UTC | norfolkbroadsnetwork | Great, thanks. We're intending to add a lot more data specific to Boaters. | |
| 44792484 by norfolkbroadsnetwork | 1 | 2016-12-30 19:50:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Adjusted tag amenity numbering. |
| 2 | 2016-12-30 19:57:59 UTC | BCNorwich | Although the underscore is not incorrect it shows as not right in some tagging checkers. The colon does not present an anomaly and putting the numbers from (no number) 0 upwards keeps features numerically in line.I think that makes sense! | |
| 44786678 by hcbnffc | 1 | 2016-12-30 15:19:50 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Are you trying to make new Pokémon sites by any chance?We like to see new editors, if you have any questions, feel free to ask |
| 2 | 2016-12-30 17:27:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, could you please verify that the four park areas are recreation areas that are open to the public? If they are then it would be good to map the access to them.If they are not then leisure=park is not a correct description to use. Perhaps landuse=grass/meadow ornatural=grassland would be be... | |
| 44720205 by Ang3lfish | 1 | 2016-12-28 07:36:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just wanted to let you know that it's not necessary to always tag a two-way road as 'oneway=no'. A two way road without a 'oneway key/tag' is, (in the absence of a 'oneway=yes' tag) automatically taken as being 'oneway=no'So although not being incorrect ''onewa... |
| 44711841 by conchiglie | 1 | 2016-12-27 18:53:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I just changed the tag from park to recreation ground to better reflect the areas use. |
| 44711732 by conchiglie | 1 | 2016-12-27 18:12:37 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMWhen I see your first edit deleting stuff with comment of deleting excessive detail, this is worrying. OSM wants MORE detail not less. Why have you deleted stuff like this? |
| 2 | 2016-12-27 18:19:21 UTC | chillly | Looking at this more closely I have reverted this edit. There is no way all this should be deleted. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-27 18:47:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Just wanted to add support to the decision to revert this changeset. It's very easy to make mistakes when you first jump into OSM mapping, I'm sure freefromsociety can make positive contributions. Just takes little research as to best practices first. | |
| 4 | 2016-12-28 09:27:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | Whilst it might make sense to restore some of this detail, I'm a bit sceptical about others - I doubt that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385445828 is any sort of "pedestrian area", for example. | |
| 5 | 2016-12-28 14:04:24 UTC | trigpoint | Also, whilst not part of this changeset. The A16 is incorrectly mapped as a dual carriageway. This could use a tidy up. | |
| 44624218 by midwich | 1 | 2016-12-26 14:06:31 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've looked at what you've added to the database and see quite a few problems. The Howardian Hills: Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty is not just the area you mapped (please see the map here :- http://www.howardianhills.org.uk/about-us/). There is no lar... |
| 42958843 by Dragma | 1 | 2016-12-25 16:37:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you need to tag the buildings (building=house) otherwise they won't show on the map. I've done the ones at Marzion. |
| 39956780 by lanzelot72 | 1 | 2016-07-25 17:49:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, a few of your ways are not tagged! |
| 2 | 2016-07-25 17:52:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Forgot to say please see :- http://tinyurl.com/jf5amft | |
| 3 | 2016-12-25 11:18:38 UTC | BCNorwich | No reply so removed some untagged ways. | |
| 44603969 by mrYoLo | 1 | 2016-12-25 10:47:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenSreetMap.You might not be aware that OSM is a live worldwide database. Thus everything we add must be correct and precise. I have reverted your changeset/additions because they added ways are duplicates and somewhat fictitious. I hope you can understand the desire to keep ... |
| 44493445 by DavidBryans | 1 | 2016-12-18 17:16:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap, a live worldwide database from which folk make lots of maps.I just looked at your addition to OSM and there are some problems. You've somehow added an area on Ledborough Road, 600 feet long 0ft wide. The candle company does not exist in the middle of Wilton Roa... |
| 2 | 2016-12-25 08:41:15 UTC | BCNorwich | No response from the mapper so the changeset has been reverted. | |
| 44616825 by J107 | 1 | 2016-12-23 11:20:41 UTC | lostmike | Welcome to OSMWhy have you extended this footpath on to existing streets? There's really no need to add separate ways for this. |
| 2 | 2016-12-25 08:35:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Yes Welcome to OpenStreetMap, I have reverted your changeset because the duplicated ways would only serve to disrupt existing data. If you need any help adding something please just ask or read up how to do it properly. There's a help section here :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/helpRegards | |
| 44634982 by ChiefJackYT | 1 | 2016-12-25 08:16:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I removed a path and an untagged way which looked totally out of place, I suppose you're still learning. Please remember this is a live worldwide database. Please don't upload stuff till you're sure it's correct. Regards & Thanks |
| 44634971 by ChiefJackYT | 1 | 2016-12-25 08:10:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I have reverted this changeset because it inadvertently dragged parish boundary, paths, roads ect out of original alignment. |
| 44604293 by ChiefJackYT | 1 | 2016-12-25 08:01:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I've tidied up the paths you marked and placed descriptive tags on them. They will now appear on the map.I drew the paths from the Bing image, hope they are OK. How do the paths connect to the recreation ground and/or paths to the south please? Also do you know details of the nature trail a... |
| 44603968 by ChiefJackYT | 1 | 2016-12-25 07:55:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've drawn the recreation ground which is all foot access. |
| 44653684 by merisonben | 1 | 2016-12-25 06:51:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I can find no evidence of this park and stream or moat. With three houses being demolished there should have been a planning request at least. I have therefore removed your additions. Perhaps the park is in a different place? Your mapping was actually pretty go... |
| 2 | 2016-12-26 06:53:13 UTC | Glassman | I suspect this was an attempt to influence pokemon go. Good to see it removed. | |
| 44632640 by opmilne | 1 | 2016-12-23 21:39:59 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Please remember that OSM is a live database, and we only map what exists in the real world.Aerial imagery suggests that this path does not exist, can you convince me otherwise? |
| 2 | 2016-12-24 08:15:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Yes Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The park doesn't look right either. I can find no reference to a park or public space here. It is likely to be part of Woolmer's park, a large farm. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-24 11:07:35 UTC | trigpoint | Reverted | |
| 44623857 by LukeBenjamin | 1 | 2016-12-24 07:41:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, This path duplicates a way already mapped as a shared cycleway. It adds nothing so should really be removed. |
| 44608112 by RussJeff | 1 | 2016-12-24 07:05:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for adding the park. Just a few pointers I have removed a duplicate park outline. Amended the park outline, name and path. There are many more features to this new park it would be good if you could survey and map them.Regards Bernard |
| 44619270 by mansteris | 1 | 2016-12-23 16:44:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Outline of park area is mapped, no need for a POI |
| 44604913 by Carlos Quiñones Seirul-lo | 1 | 2016-12-23 13:53:30 UTC | BCNorwich | removed duplicated way, added foot=yes tag to specifically imply foot use. |
| 44604635 by Carlos Quiñones Seirul-lo | 1 | 2016-12-23 13:50:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi you now have here the existing service road (Greenwich Industrial Estate) and your footpath (the movement) on top of each other. One must be wrong? Also each word in a proper name should be capitalised. |
| 2 | 2016-12-23 14:02:11 UTC | Carlos Quiñones Seirul-lo | There is no industrial Estate anymore for a few years. Now there's a housing complex called The Movement and this path is a very good shortcut to the greenwich train station | |
| 44604355 by Wollysapper | 1 | 2016-12-23 09:43:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Northern section of path was a duplication of an existing cycleway. |
| 44600679 by Nt28041 | 1 | 2016-12-23 08:41:12 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The name at least, and perhaps the website and address would be very helpful additions to the database. |
| 44602224 by kyleuttley | 1 | 2016-12-23 06:59:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just looked at your addition to the OSM database. This way is already in OSM so the new way is a duplication, thus I have removed it. You did add some new data which I have included on the existing way. I also see the way extends to the service road at north so... |
| 44593741 by jcbmileend | 1 | 2016-12-22 18:33:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Added your post:postcode=E3 5GY onto the highway as postalcode=E3 5GY which is the correct way to add this information to a highway. Regards |
| 44593609 by jcbmileend | 1 | 2016-12-22 18:22:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi just removed housename =1 as that is not the house name. |
| 44263090 by bartooh hootrab | 1 | 2016-12-08 18:56:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I can find no reference to a hostel on Henrietta Street, Spalding. Items added to the OSM database must be verifiable by some means, preferably on the ground. Can you show that this POI exists please?Regards. |
| 2 | 2016-12-22 08:51:44 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so POI removed. | |
| 44421535 by jgha | 1 | 2016-12-21 18:58:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Sadly your first addition to the OSM database has gone wrong. I have had to revert your changeset that has inadvertently dragged the building outline out of shape. Everything is now back as it was.Regards |
| 44484007 by Tiara Ramadhani | 1 | 2016-12-18 08:38:37 UTC | BCNorwich | You should have been alerted by my comments by now. So can you please finish with adding fiction to the map? It's rather a silly game but you've shown that you do have good skills for mapping. The OpenStreetMap community would like to make you welcome to contribute in a more constructive way.All B... |
| 2 | 2016-12-18 23:28:44 UTC | SomeoneElse | @BCNorwich , see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1122 . | |
| 3 | 2016-12-20 08:20:02 UTC | BCNorwich | @SomeoneElse, Have you removed all the fiction? As I usually follow up what I comment on.Regards | |
| 4 | 2016-12-20 09:13:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | @BCNorwich http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kLz finds couple of nodes created in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44483642 - that probably needs looking at to see what joins were created there. | |
| 44493582 by AnthonyH01 | 1 | 2016-12-18 17:29:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.May I point out that the building you've address tagged as number 19 is actually a pair of semi detached houses. The address would only apply to one house not both. The other buildings are semis as well. If you need help splitting the building please just ask. ... |
| 44090227 by khbritish | 1 | 2016-12-18 12:02:50 UTC | BCNorwich | removed as mapped in the wrong place. |
| 43700961 by khbritish | 1 | 2016-11-29 18:16:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There,I just wanted to point out a few problems I can see in this changeset. The highway=track that you've drawn continuously up and down the field are not highways. They are the trails the tractor made while ploughing and planting the crop.The south field is not landuse=grass it should ... |
| 2 | 2016-12-18 11:50:24 UTC | BCNorwich | Not response so fiction is now deleted. | |
| 44483980 by Tiara Ramadhani | 1 | 2016-12-18 08:39:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Fiction. |
| 44483990 by Tiara Ramadhani | 1 | 2016-12-18 08:32:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Fiction, and not very imaginative. |
| 44483925 by Tiara Ramadhani | 1 | 2016-12-18 08:28:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Middle of the sea? |
| 44483837 by Tiara Ramadhani | 1 | 2016-12-18 08:27:00 UTC | BCNorwich | ? |
| 44483810 by Tiara Ramadhani | 1 | 2016-12-18 08:25:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Fiction? name is tagged wrong, way goes across fields. |
| 44483790 by Tiara Ramadhani | 1 | 2016-12-18 08:22:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Again fields. |
| 44483767 by Tiara Ramadhani | 1 | 2016-12-18 08:20:30 UTC | BCNorwich | In the middle of a field? |
| 44483722 by Tiara Ramadhani | 1 | 2016-12-18 08:17:02 UTC | BCNorwich | This is reverted, looks like it was a practice or something went wrong. There was a building on-top of a building with one corner dragged up over the railway line 1/2 mile away. |
| 44483642 by Tiara Ramadhani | 1 | 2016-12-18 08:12:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the new path is mapped on top of some buildings, as described by the tag layer=1 which means that item is above the building. But it is also tagged tunnel=yes which indicates it is under or through the building. Clearly the is something not quite right or lacking here? |
| 44483619 by Tiara Ramadhani | 1 | 2016-12-18 07:58:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted this addition as the new road (Residential Road) is a fiction possibly added by mistake or as a test. The live worldwide database is not the place for testing. Regards |
| 42931317 by SK53 | 1 | 2016-12-18 07:11:34 UTC | BCNorwich | With respect, Way: 447956699 lacks any tagging and looks a bit unusual. Regards |
| 2 | 2016-12-18 21:08:03 UTC | SK53 | Removed. Turns out it was an accidentally duplicated from the grammar school way even though it doesnt look quite the same. | |
| 44443297 by Ianx1 | 1 | 2016-12-17 21:02:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, I think you may be mistaken regarding the existence of this path. There is a faint path that can be seen on the Bing image from the end of the track. (Certainly the track section ought not be deleted.) The mapper uploaded a gpx trace for the whole route. Starting from the car park going... |
| 44475287 by pookey99 | 1 | 2016-12-17 19:40:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Tweaked school building and tags. |
| 44475259 by pookey99 | 1 | 2016-12-17 19:27:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed building which was mapped on the pedestrian bridge over the railway. Station is already mapped. |
| 44475159 by pookey99 | 1 | 2016-12-17 19:20:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Tweaked the building outlines and addresses. |
| 44475107 by pookey99 | 1 | 2016-12-17 19:08:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.May I please point out that this addition to the OSM database inadvertently duplicate a residential land use area. There are more than fifty house numbers, not just the one you added. There are two or more postcodes. Post codes and house numbers are best added ... |
| 44284286 by Doc_Connors | 1 | 2016-12-15 13:40:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, just wanted to let you know that this is a live worldwide database from which lots of ordinary folk build maps. So I have removed your track. You are most welcome to add genuine features to OSM and there are plenty of resources to learn how to do this properly.Regards |
| 44420926 by BrianWharf | 1 | 2016-12-15 13:08:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It is impossible to work out what you wanted to achieve with this addition to the live OSM database as there are no descriptive tags. What I can deduce is that as far as I am aware this line is not verifiable as existing in reality, (unless you can enlighten me).... |
| 2 | 2016-12-15 15:05:26 UTC | BrianWharf | Feel free, what I was trying to achieve doesn't seem possible here. Also, you may wish to get somebody to read back your text as some of it seems rather condescending. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-15 16:23:49 UTC | trigpoint | What were you trying to achieve? Maybe someone can help. OSN is based around tags, so any untagged object will do nothing in OSM. | |
| 44417207 by tonydavis41 | 1 | 2016-12-15 09:30:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have removed the address tags, as there are several post codes and hundreds of numbers on this road also the name was already tagged.I think there are other roads near/adjoining that have 20mph limits, it would be good if you could survey and map those limits... |
| 44359589 by Mintra | 1 | 2016-12-14 07:26:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, are you sure Fairways joins to Granville Road here now, there was a fence and verge separating them? |
| 2 | 2016-12-14 08:31:06 UTC | Mintra | Not sure what you mean by the fence and verge "separating" them, but then I did not see it before. Certainly it is now an open and working junction. | |
| 44359627 by Michela Amato | 1 | 2016-12-13 06:49:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for the recent additions to the OSM database. I have however removed POIs :- Westminister Abbey, Trafalgar Square, and both National Gallery. The reason being that the information in the POIs is already mapped/contained on the feature (area or building). T... |
| 44285817 by AGomezLTD | 1 | 2016-12-12 07:32:15 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your changeset in order to reinstate the altered land/building use tags, thus maintain the business park area. Also to reinstate positions of highways inadvertently moved. This reversion reinstates the Gomez building which was deleted. Added a f... |
| 43861420 by Sam888 | 1 | 2016-12-08 14:55:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Outlined areas of heath you have mapped have several sections where the line doubles back on itself. It's really very easy to map areas like this correctly. Please read up on better methods as you are repeatedly doing this. See http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-4.08161&lat=5... |
| 2 | 2016-12-10 12:55:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed several area outline self intersections and re-tagged areas. Much better now. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-10 13:18:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | @BCNorwich - thanks. | |
| 44157057 by Dyserth | 1 | 2016-12-10 12:50:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed some self intersecting area outlines for you. |
| 44084508 by Sam888 | 1 | 2016-12-08 15:07:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, a lot of the area you have mapped as heath is actually forest. |
| 44084337 by Sam888 | 1 | 2016-12-08 15:05:48 UTC | BCNorwich | More self intersections of area outline.Plus now including large obvious areas of water in you natural=heath.Please take time to map things properly. |
| 43931806 by Dyserth | 1 | 2016-12-08 14:57:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed self intersection from area outline of natural=wood |
| 44229983 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2016-12-07 18:55:14 UTC | Tomas Straupis | This change will be reverted because it is made with no local knowledge, based on incorrect microsoft/bing data and very inaccurate mapbox "calculations" etc. |
| 2 | 2016-12-07 19:24:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, thanks for the correction and thanks for not just reverting but making better adjustments. | |
| 44232810 by Wiggo24 | 1 | 2016-12-07 16:40:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted this changeset in order to put back into its original place a footpath that was inadvertently moved. |
| 43858128 by 24326678 | 1 | 2016-11-23 20:54:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Re-tagged to show disused as pub with note on new use. More appropriate that a fictitious name. |
| 2 | 2016-12-06 07:35:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Alterations did not upload, now redone. | |
| 43647609 by Lord Hartley | 1 | 2016-11-23 15:01:31 UTC | BCNorwich | This is Southend University Hospital - MSCP.There are now two car parks mapped on top of each other. The service road layout has also changed. |
| 2 | 2016-12-06 07:14:17 UTC | Lord Hartley | Yes, I know, I work there and slowly getting site plans and making adjustments.. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-06 07:25:53 UTC | BCNorwich | OK thanks! | |
| 44083733 by Sam888 | 1 | 2016-12-04 19:37:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, why map this heath area on top of the already mapped forest areas? It really doesn't make much sense, especially as it's very easy to map the areas correctly from the Bing image that you seem to be traceing. |
| 44125270 by Ser Vre | 1 | 2016-12-03 07:41:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Things added to OSM must SerVre a purpose and be verifiable on the ground by all. I take it that this castle is in your mind and therefore only verifiable by your good self. I will revert the addition, reverting means it can easily be reinstated should you be abl... |
| 44124931 by RodgersJS | 1 | 2016-12-03 07:26:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your outline is not correct with regard to Bloody Oaks Quarry nature reserve. It is a Leicestershire & Rutland Wildlife Trust property outline shown here :- http://www.lrwt.org.uk/nature-reserves/bloody-oaks-quarry/Regards |
| 2 | 2016-12-03 08:47:35 UTC | RodgersJS | Hi, The area I outined is in fact the reserve. I've visited it oftenRegards | |
| 44007370 by Space_junk | 1 | 2016-11-28 17:54:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see you made your first contribution to the map. Unfortunately it looks like a fiction, obviously just a test. I have reverted that trial run so no harm is done to the live worldwide database.If you wish to make a usefull addition I would suggest starting her... |
| 43835054 by bob098 | 1 | 2016-11-28 09:44:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There,You've made some really good additions to OpenStreetMap, I'm sure the community appreciates that. The latest additions/alterations however are a bit silly so I have reverted those changes.Regards |
| 43919695 by kushywushy | 1 | 2016-11-27 12:14:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Fictions have been deleted. |
| 43919667 by kushywushy | 1 | 2016-11-27 12:14:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Fictions have been deleted. |
| 43919516 by kushywushy | 1 | 2016-11-27 12:14:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
| 43866766 by kushywushy | 1 | 2016-11-27 12:13:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
| 43866742 by kushywushy | 1 | 2016-11-27 12:13:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
| 43866709 by kushywushy | 1 | 2016-11-27 12:13:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
| 43866585 by kushywushy | 1 | 2016-11-27 12:12:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
| 43866349 by kushywushy | 1 | 2016-11-27 12:12:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
| 43866281 by kushywushy | 1 | 2016-11-27 12:12:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Fictions have been reverted. |
| 43938634 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2016-11-26 16:09:28 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this should probably be tagged as a gallery rather than an artwork.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2016-11-26 16:32:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Agree, changed. | |
| 43937796 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2016-11-25 14:08:59 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, changing Tesco Express from amenity=fuel to a shelter looks very odd to me. Is there a good reason for that?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2016-11-25 14:32:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Sorry, I wanted to add the feature/area as a shelter but failed to realise I was removing the fuel tag from amenity. Looking at it again shelter doesn't seem right anyway. Now found building=canopy, perfect.Regards | |
| 43888796 by Londonturk | 1 | 2016-11-23 18:32:10 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. There is no need to fill the name tag with what is a description.We can see it is a postbox from its amenity tag. Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2016-11-25 07:41:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Corrected operator name spelling and collection time syntax. | |
| 43898421 by hamzaahmad786 | 1 | 2016-11-25 07:30:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This is a live worldwide database from which hundreds of maps are made. As such it relies on the data provided by folk like you to be precise and accurate. Unfortunately you newly added path is somewhat lacking.Your path lacks any description tags thus map ma... |
| 43798820 by Chad Cole | 1 | 2016-11-24 09:32:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to the worldwide OpenStreetMap database.Your three recently mapped POI are complete fiction so I have reverted the changesets. Everything added to the OSM database must be verifiable on the ground and the is nothing verifiable at these three positions. Please feel free to map the ad... |
| 43710320 by djcater | 1 | 2016-11-24 09:20:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've joined your new path to the rest of the highway system. As it was the path wasn't linked to anywhere, so therefore pretty useless. Joined up routers can use it to guide folk.Regards |
| 2 | 2016-11-26 13:10:35 UTC | djcater | This was my first edit, thank you for linking it up! Looks great. | |
| 43667291 by Aleen Osa | 1 | 2016-11-19 08:50:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've looked through your first additions to the live worldwide OSM database and would like to make a few comments, (comments hopefully to allow your mapping contributions to be more meaningful).All your uploaded changesets have the same comment, (the HOT one yo... |
| 43045992 by Valleys Cycling | 1 | 2016-11-16 08:39:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, there are now several sections of duplicated highway. The existing mapped highways have a second highway placed on top of it. There is only one highway which could accommodate all descriptive tags. But the existing highway should take precedence for routeing purposes. |
| 2 | 2017-04-13 12:08:33 UTC | Valleys Cycling | Hi, I am sorry, I have only just noticed your discussion comment. I shall try and edit but I am still learning. In some places I do not want to show the proposed cycleway as part of the existing highway as it might be a proposed new section alongside the road. At other points I do want the cycleway ... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-13 22:27:19 UTC | Valleys Cycling | I have edited these now so there shouldn't be highways on top of highways. Any other feedback, let me know.Thanks | |
| 43616663 by Sam888 | 1 | 2016-11-15 08:06:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I just wanted to point out that your recent mapping contains numerous self intersections on heath area outlines. Please see here for examples :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-3.83213&lat=53.03433&zoom=10&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_po... |
| 43547223 by ArtemTheFirst | 1 | 2016-11-11 07:53:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Doesn't really convey the fact that this is a "Children's Play Area and Hard Court".Also "By Village Hall" is not it's name, rather a description as to its location, (beside the village hall). |
| 43547206 by ArtemTheFirst | 1 | 2016-11-11 07:42:31 UTC | BCNorwich | South Woodham Garage I think. Do they still sell fuel? |
| 43546959 by ArtemTheFirst | 1 | 2016-11-11 07:09:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I have put the full name for this works on the property that was already mapped. Thus the property is updated and the POI unnecessary so is removed. |
| 43446050 by Jim Thurston | 1 | 2016-11-06 18:37:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Features added to the OSM database must be factual and verifiable on the ground by any one. So this POI looks like it is a fiction. It is in fact a Post Box address and as such should be removed. |
| 2 | 2016-11-08 18:57:56 UTC | trigpoint | Should we not just remove the spam, and tag it as a postbox. The shop could probably use a post office node too? | |
| 3 | 2016-11-08 20:52:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Agreed that makes sense. My information came from a web search so I'm not free to transfer that positional data. If you're happy please make the change. | |
| 43480036 by Flooring Store In Milton | 1 | 2016-11-08 08:44:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your addition/alteration to the OSM database as it actually adds nothing, just drags two other highways out of alignment. So in effect I have put the highways back as they were.Please take a little time to learn OSM basics before having anothe... |
| 43446277 by Jim Thurston | 1 | 2016-11-06 17:39:53 UTC | trigpoint | If http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4485696947 is a postbox, then it should be tagged amenity=postbox, there will be a ref on the plate. It will not have a postcode as it is not somewhere post is delivered to. |
| 2 | 2016-11-06 17:49:12 UTC | Jim Thurston | This is the postal address for The Maylands Mayl - The PostBox is where the mail is placed so that it doesn't get mixed up with the mail for the supermarket. | |
| 3 | 2016-11-06 18:27:47 UTC | trigpoint | So is thete an office inside the supermarket building? | |
| 4 | 2016-11-06 18:47:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, this is a Post Office Box presumably inside the post office not outside the building. From their website (http://www.themaylandsmayl.com/) there is no office at the building. | |
| 43274873 by safe haven | 1 | 2016-10-30 06:49:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Please read up a bit before adding features to the OSM database as it's a live worldwide site from which folk make maps. Please see the Help items at the top of the page. Incomplete or incorrect data tends to mess with proper rendering.Your two nodes near bank ... |
| 2 | 2016-11-06 09:25:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Two untagged nodes removed, Safe Haven added. | |
| 43401711 by Lui_E98 | 1 | 2016-11-04 14:19:35 UTC | BCNorwich | All are sadly lacking information, some are wrong. |
| 43376035 by Lui_E98 | 1 | 2016-11-03 18:38:05 UTC | trigpoint | Again, is this really here? |
| 2 | 2016-11-03 18:41:11 UTC | trigpoint | It is too close to http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4120739487 to be likely | |
| 3 | 2016-11-04 14:11:02 UTC | BCNorwich | This node is not listed on the website :- https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/cycling/santander-cyclesThere is a bike rental place listed and mapped just over the water on Goods Way. | |
| 4 | 2016-11-04 16:54:30 UTC | trigpoint | I had already pointed out that node, and we really should not be using gm based tfl.gov.uk | |
| 43375930 by Lui_E98 | 1 | 2016-11-03 18:36:22 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM.This edit looks a little odd, the name indicates that these should be bicycle_hire but I am not sure about these. There are others mapped nearby and it is unlikely that such things would be missing from the map. Do you have any more information? |
| 2 | 2016-11-04 07:21:27 UTC | BCNorwich | I don't think 4478909590 exists, but there is a dock round the corner on Greenland Road.The other two I've tagged similar to other cycle hire stations. If Lui_E98 would like to look at these and use this type of tagging it would concur with how other stations are mapped. | |
| 3 | 2016-11-04 11:54:44 UTC | trigpoint | I am not convinced any exist, discussion on irc suggested that they are personal markers of some sort. Cycle hire is not something our London mappers generally miss.I was planning to revert, just seeing if I can get a response from the maps.me user. | |
| 4 | 2016-11-04 14:09:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Nodes 4478899792 and 4478899791 are listed at the mapped position on the website :- https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/cycling/santander-cyclesNode 4478899790 is not listed, there is a bike rental just around the corner. | |
| 5 | 2016-11-04 18:51:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | For info, see "message to you as one that has to be read before you can continue mapping" at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1076 . | |
| 43361347 by ytera | 1 | 2016-11-03 06:39:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see the shop WONDEROUND is not correctly placed and has been situated actually on the street. The shop is some distance up the road beyond Boundary Street, also you've got the number wrong.It would be best to correct these problems. If you cannot draw the pre... |
| 2 | 2016-11-03 15:54:10 UTC | ytera | thank you for the correction. I couldn't correct the mark on the map so I've placed a new mark for WONDEROUND. kindly confirm. | |
| 3 | 2016-11-03 17:37:54 UTC | harg | I can only see one of them -- to the East of Boundary Street.Oh, and could you avoid using all-caps for company names. | |
| 4 | 2016-11-03 19:14:10 UTC | BCNorwich | OK the two were in place when the page was refreshed. I've now removed the first (misplaced) one. After a minute and the page refreshed again only the corrected POI displayed. Thanks yteraAs for all capitol letters in the name, that is how the company writes it. I agree it's not good to see. | |
| 5 | 2016-11-04 02:04:18 UTC | ytera | understood. I've corrected the company name. | |
| 43337593 by Siftersam | 1 | 2016-11-02 06:54:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.You've made some useful modifications to the OSM database. One problem that I think you might be unaware of, the placing of a tree in the middle of Waterhouse Lane by the Esso fuel station. Although it appears not to interfere with the highway I think it's fictit... |
| 43313632 by Mr Steve Collins | 1 | 2016-11-01 07:05:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see you have also named that section of highway from the A143 south to Water Lane as Church Road. Your upload comment suggests you did not mean to add the name to the whole section. Please be aware that a highway can be edited to split the way into two sect... |
| 43287573 by Earthfish | 1 | 2016-10-31 07:08:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your change to it's original state because the deleted way was not a duplicate. The highway you thought was a better placement is actually a bus lane. There are, as can be seen on the Bing image, three ways from Gubbins Lane into Station Road.... |
| 42772122 by MessyCret | 1 | 2016-10-10 11:01:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Several of the ways you've recently added to OSM are not joined to the roads that they go to, (in this and other change-sets). Also in many instances they cross streams and other boundary's without showing how these barriers are overcome.May I suggest you read... |
| 2 | 2016-10-30 07:24:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Tidied up quite a few footpaths, corrected where paths cross water and added a few bridges. | |
| 43266778 by connorjewiss | 1 | 2016-10-29 17:15:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you've placed a park inside of a park which doesn't seem correct. Further the two park boundaries are joined at one of the nodes. |
| 43266726 by connorjewiss | 1 | 2016-10-29 17:09:15 UTC | BCNorwich | A brief look at the paths you've added shows a few anomalies. Several paths are not connected to the roads that they got to. Several paths are on such similar lines that they might be duplication's. Several paths are joined to or go along area outlines. It might be wise to look at them all and recti... |
| 43231745 by Malli Baskaran | 1 | 2016-10-28 05:52:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I think you have positioned this property on the wrong side of the road (as far as the existing mapping of roads is concerned). It is not therefore verifiable on the ground as mapped. Further it is very unlikely that the feature is officially name "Home". Also if it is your home i... |
| 2 | 2016-11-04 23:10:27 UTC | trigpoint | Reverting #DROB | |
| 43230784 by Malli Baskaran | 1 | 2016-10-28 05:39:51 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This area looks like it is entirely residential with no shops. Could you please state the name and details of the business? Is it a business operated from a house? Does it have a website to verify it exists?Features added to the OSM database should be verifiab... |
| 43223356 by Ghenna Mazur | 1 | 2016-10-27 17:32:24 UTC | Harry Wood | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see you've added "my home". It worked! But I guess there is no guesthouse called "my home" here. Instead I've changed it for you, to be a building=house. The address information is still on there, and that's great. You're welcome to add more address... |
| 2 | 2016-10-27 18:53:15 UTC | BCNorwich | Yes Welcome, I've just corrected the postcode for you. | |
| 43219999 by Globale Protection | 1 | 2016-10-27 17:53:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, your opening hours are incorrectly presented. please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours |
| 43193010 by cactusbase | 1 | 2016-10-26 17:30:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think if you visit this footpath you will find it is a public right of way. Therefore tagging should reflect this, foot=designated, designation=public_footpath also access=permissive is incorrect and should be removed. |
| 43095557 by wembleyspotter | 1 | 2016-10-24 09:32:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello this "line i9n bow" that you have added to the OSM database does not contain enough information to be of any use. Unless you can expand on it, or explain it then it should be removed. |
| 43095490 by wembleyspotter | 1 | 2016-10-24 09:24:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, can you state the purpose of this "blook line"? What is it, what is it for, is it verifiable? You have added it to the OMS live database and I can see no reason for it. Thanks. |
| 42704509 by Morrolan | 1 | 2016-10-18 07:13:15 UTC | BCNorwich | For your attention please. There is still a lot more duplicated ways where you have placed a new footway on top of existing highways. The whole lot should be removed as it is incorrect, (there are not two ways one atop another), and it corrupts routing software. |
| 2 | 2016-10-19 19:16:09 UTC | Morrolan | My apologies for my ignorance - as I created this as one single line, I assumed that deleting it would remove all traces, however as you say this doesn't appear to be the case.Please could you point me to a specific point where this is still in error (or inform me what I am looking for, i.e. how... | |
| 3 | 2016-10-19 19:53:15 UTC | BCNorwich | HI, I could now only find one long section of duplication near Kinmel Bay, I've deleted it all rather than trying to explain where it is. I think you've removed all the other sections. I noticed the duplication's as I regularly check new mapping for these problems here :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/o... | |
| 4 | 2016-10-20 10:36:50 UTC | Morrolan | Hi Bernard, many thanks for that. I will ensure that I read the url's you sent me so that I can avoid causing more issues in the future.The Wales Coast Path, whilst it does share some coastal distance, is a separate path from the North Wales Path which ventures inland from the coast. However i... | |
| 42978994 by moopling | 1 | 2016-10-18 12:21:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately your up updating of this way has resulted in a duplication of highways, (one atop another). There seems to be no on the ground restriction to access through this way so I wonder why the access=private tag? Nor any official 20mph restriction that is v... |
| 42883804 by fitzsimons | 1 | 2016-10-17 06:10:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, sorry to say I think you've had a mishap with this changeset. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93715163It looks like Way: Duddingston Gardens (93715163) has been aligned in a circle. Also dragging part of the railway fence, which shared several nodes, with it (Way: 405090252).... |
| 42880271 by Joseph Marshall | 1 | 2016-10-14 05:39:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I'd just like to point out that your addition to the database (highway named Hudson Way) is not joined to the existing highway network. If you know it is joined to the network then it would be good for you to map it as such. The road immediately north is a serv... |
| 42350967 by SeanMimnagh | 1 | 2016-09-22 17:58:14 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.There is still a problem here, your addition and subsequent amendments leave a duplicated outline for the building. Both outlines similarly tagged.With respect I think the eastern third of the building might be a house. The western two thirds may be two houses ... |
| 2 | 2016-10-12 07:19:56 UTC | BCNorwich | No response, duplicate removed. | |
| 39214362 by DGoodfellow | 1 | 2016-10-11 08:18:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I've reverted your addition to the OpenStreetMap database. Reason being that this building is not at Romola Road. |
| 42788417 by kneamosm | 1 | 2016-10-11 05:40:15 UTC | BCNorwich | Change-set reverted!Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately your first addition to the OSM database went a bit wrong it inadvertently altered existing data and added a road haphazardly through buildings. Therefore I have reverted those alterations for you. I would suggest you read up ... |
| 42772672 by MGMRoastBeef | 1 | 2016-10-10 11:23:51 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your addition to OSM of the sandwich shop, addressed as Washington has appeared in London UK. You've tagged it as a place of worship.If you can't amend it I'll remove it shortly. Regards |
| 42771493 by Reece May | 1 | 2016-10-10 11:14:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've tidied up your additions and changed the name tag on the garden to a note tag, I don't think that was the proper name for the area. I added landuse=grass to indicate the surface and removed the area tag, (a way, (line) enclosing an area is taken as an area a... |
| 42749120 by njwcat7 | 1 | 2016-10-09 11:37:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think some of the changes you made to Whiting's Lane are incorrect.This is a Norfolk County Council maintained unsurfaced road, reference U33198. Therefore, as far as OSM mapping is concerned, an unclassified highway, even though it may appear to be only a tr... |
| 2 | 2016-10-09 12:48:41 UTC | njwcat7 | Hi BernardI've changed the vehicle classification back; that wasn't an intended edit but probably a result of a bit of fat-fingers on my part :)I'm trying to get it shown for what it us; an unpaved road that's too rough to ride a road bike down. Having found this out the hard way yesterday w... | |
| 3 | 2016-10-10 10:55:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | Personally if something appears to be a track I'd map it as a track :)There are plenty of places that are some sort of "road" (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50733252 ) which are best described as tracks; perhaps a designation of "unclassified_road" might work to indica... | |
| 42708417 by Muhammadreza Haghiri | 1 | 2016-10-07 14:39:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The node you added is untagged and in the middle of a featureless body of water. As such it adds nothing to the OSM database and should be removed. |
| 42573025 by Morrolan | 1 | 2016-10-06 18:02:24 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I just want to point out that in adding the North Wales Path you have duplicated lots of highways. You've placed a new way on top of a lot of existing ways. A better way would be to segment the existing ways and add them to a relation, naming that relation the North Wales Path. The Wales Coas... |
| 2 | 2016-10-06 18:08:36 UTC | BCNorwich | I forgot to say that in great many places you now have a footway going down the middle of a vehicle highway. This duplication also seriously messes up routing. | |
| 42572526 by eltayeb mustafa | 1 | 2016-10-02 05:59:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The positioning of this hotel POI, in the alley behind buildings, some way away fro the address of Romford Road, will not be much help in helping folk to find it. Better to actually draw the building and state the floor if the building has multiple businesses.\... |
| 2 | 2016-10-02 12:08:14 UTC | trigpoint | The name translates as house, which is an unlikely name for a hotel so I suspect this yet another personal marker edit from a maps.me user. Reverting this. | |
| 42340872 by iwhs | 1 | 2016-09-30 19:27:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, your hedge "way 443736827" covers the whole of the road Roud Road. Surely this cannot be correct. |
| 2 | 2016-09-30 19:44:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Also hedge way 443736828 is mapped the same. This effectively places a barrier across the whole highway. Better to map each hedge separately. An individual hedge as a linear feature can have a width (and height) tag added thereby not needing an area drawn. For an extremely thick hedge draw a closed ... | |
| 42472217 by Stan Hutcheon | 1 | 2016-09-27 17:48:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I noticed your addition to the OSM database and made a few alterations to better reflect the geography. Your address was on the whole building not just the bar. Regards |
| 42433010 by Loong Han | 1 | 2016-09-26 13:51:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.There are a few things wrong with your addition of this bar to the OSM database. Firstly unless it has recently moved from number 3 to number 12 Balham High Road then you have placed it in the wrong position. Further the name:en tag is not needed (you've already ... |
| 41683473 by Mobil Container Solutions | 1 | 2016-08-25 17:27:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You have mapped your company on a block of residential apartments. You've given it an American address and phone number, also abbreviated the street name. You've tagged it as amenity=place_of_worship. All of which are obviously wrong. The website makes no mention... |
| 2 | 2016-09-23 17:31:17 UTC | BCNorwich | No response from mapper so the obviously incorrect data has been removed. | |
| 42323324 by BI Wines | 1 | 2016-09-21 13:17:18 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to osm. Do you have a shop customers can visit here? |
| 2 | 2016-09-21 18:18:11 UTC | BCNorwich | There's no shop, that address is the registered company office for an online wine seller. | |
| 42228550 by Jan Swanwick | 1 | 2016-09-17 17:01:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just an observation, I notice that Accommodation Way is not connected to Wayside/Woodside. I suspect that the ways do in fact join so it would be best to connect them in the database, thus routing can be computed and folk can render maps accordingly. Regards |
| 2 | 2016-09-30 13:10:27 UTC | Jan Swanwick | Thanks for the feedback. It was my first addition, so hopefully today's edit will have corrected it and made it routable.ThanksJan | |
| 41926556 by LegBritSlav | 1 | 2016-09-17 05:47:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, your addition of Hyde Park Place made a duplicated highway. I have therefore removed your duplicate and amended street names. |
| 42200328 by Mark D'Andrea | 1 | 2016-09-16 12:16:24 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution, however the Premier Inn is already mapped on the surrounding way, I am going to remove your duplicate.When editing please capitalise names properly. Thanks |
| 2 | 2016-09-16 18:30:53 UTC | BCNorwich | POI deleted before I saw the above comment. Note also that the tag name:en=??? is not needed. | |
| 3 | 2016-09-17 09:30:36 UTC | trigpoint | Sorry, I meant to delete the node when I got home.The name:en problem is a feature of maps.me, not something the user has any control of.https://github.com/mapsme/omim/issues/4149 | |
| 42186821 by C Jacobi | 1 | 2016-09-16 05:38:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The complete details for The Lamb hotel are on the building outline. I have therefore removed your duplicated information. |
| 42165591 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2016-09-15 11:04:33 UTC | DaveF | HiBrunswick Place is the name of the southern terrace of houses & so is not an alternative road name. (Montpelier is the name of the row opposite) This happens a lot in Bath.Julian Road is the road's name throughout. |
| 2 | 2016-09-15 14:14:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, OK I understand and agree with that. Mapper LegBritSlav added a way which duplicated part of Julian Road, I removed the duplication but kept the name thinking it might be valid. The alt:name is now removed and a note added with your information about the terraces. | |
| 42136905 by ljubisa boskovic | 1 | 2016-09-14 00:20:52 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello,You've made the bus stop at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/469781540/history into a bookmaker. This seems unlikely. Can you explain what happened? |
| 2 | 2016-09-14 05:36:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello,You've also added bicycle parking which is actually bicycle rental. Also tourism=attraction is not very helpful, if you know there is an attraction there why not detail it?So it unfortunately looks like all three additions are somewhat fictitious. Please correct the mistakes or remove th... | |
| 42112841 by Bikas Shahi | 1 | 2016-09-13 06:52:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your addition of a name to a building because the tag name:en=??? is not needed here. Also that is not the name of that store and in any case what you added was an address "31 green street". Which lacks capitol letters and is in fact s... |