| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58438237 by Alfonsoroca | 1 | 2018-04-26 16:36:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've placed the new hospital data on the building outline rather than duplicating.Grange City already mapped as building.Trinity House already mapped as building.Waterloo Station already mapped.St Thomas' mapped as whole hospital area.F & C Office alre... |
| 58420209 by RoystonBanana | 1 | 2018-04-26 07:27:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your node has address tags but no actual parking or disabled parking tags. Please see here for help with parking tags :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parkingRegards Bernard |
| 58420252 by Nykr | 1 | 2018-04-26 06:33:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It would be really good to show folk how they can enter onto this path. Thus folk who don't know the area can benefit more easily from the path.Regards Bernard |
| 58376592 by AnnieLyra | 1 | 2018-04-24 16:22:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, those areas are better described as playgrounds rather than parks. It is extremely doubtful that one is formally named"Small play area". I've made amendments accordingly.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2018-04-24 17:17:39 UTC | AnnieLyra | Apologies this is the first time I have used this. I will learn accordingly. Thanks | |
| 3 | 2018-04-24 17:53:51 UTC | BCNorwich | No problem, I know there is a great deal to learn. I'm still learning after 8 years and thousands of contributions. If you need any specific help please just ask, there's also forums to ask questions https://forum.openstreetmap.org/https://help.openstreetmap.org/Nearly all tags have wiki pages... | |
| 58377222 by AnnieLyra | 1 | 2018-04-24 16:52:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Is the path formally and verifiably named "proctor footpath"? If so then the name should be capitalised.Cafe details now placed on building outline.Redo tags/spelling for day care center. |
| 2 | 2018-04-24 17:15:57 UTC | AnnieLyra | The footpath is located along proctor road. It's not named at all as far as I can tell however most people who live here call it the Procter footpath. Also it joins onto a small carpal which was not already mapped. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-24 17:45:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi,OSM data should, as far as is reasonably possible, be verifiable. The principle applies to tags and other aspects of data representation, and essentially means another mapper should be able to come to the same place and collect the same data ("verify" the data you have entered). This ... | |
| 58377569 by AnnieLyra | 1 | 2018-04-24 17:05:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Retagged cycle track area. Remove several unneeded tags re a school path which is actually tagged correctly as a Rushmore Road, the way goes to the rec, not directly to the school. |
| 2 | 2018-04-24 17:14:15 UTC | AnnieLyra | It's not a cycle track it's a pedestrian area marked on the road. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-24 17:31:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Sorry but the cycle track is in the area that you inadvertently described as description=park, leisure=park. Sorry again I don't know what pedestrian area you refer to. | |
| 58377709 by AnnieLyra | 1 | 2018-04-24 17:17:55 UTC | BCNorwich | rename park and amend tags to play area |
| 58371257 by archangel100 | 1 | 2018-04-24 14:00:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hell and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The park is already mapped, so I've removed the duplicated info.Regards Bernard |
| 58342536 by jkaejkae | 1 | 2018-04-23 16:51:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap, wrong position. Church is already mapped so this POI being duplicate data is removed.Regards Bernard |
| 58319511 by Sintija Dzene | 1 | 2018-04-23 06:17:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This is a live worldwide database from which maps are compiled for various purposes including emergency's. So I hope you can appreciate that adding fiction seriously affects OSM.From the positioning and tagging of your contributions I suggest they are fiction... |
| 58320381 by Horse Badorties | 1 | 2018-04-23 06:08:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately you've joined the gate to the boundary=administrative not to the track. therefore the gate is not a barrier to the track. You will have to zoom in close to see this.Also I would have thought that general access allows agricultural but your acces... |
| 58185761 by mountainmonkey | 1 | 2018-04-21 12:24:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello mountainmonkey,You've somehow mapped a lot of these ways in duplicate, paths,tracks,fences and walls. Placing one way (path) directly and exactly on top of another (path).Thus grossly bloating the database and confusing routers over paths and tracks. I started removing some duplicate w... |
| 2 | 2018-04-22 20:35:08 UTC | mountainmonkey | Oops. JOSM crashed during upload, I thought I had resolved conflicts correctly but clearly not.Think I have fixed most of the duplicates now. | |
| 57503685 by Borbus | 1 | 2018-04-20 14:02:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi Borbus. Re stream Way: 572794326 this is already mapped. Also sorry to say your duplicate flows uphill. It is a stream rather than a ditch, I'm told fed from a spring.Would you like me to just amend any small anomalies I come across or let you know.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2018-04-20 16:40:12 UTC | Borbus | Ah, whoops! Sorry about. Yes, please remove the erroneous ditch and any others you find.It is a fairly painstaking semi-manual effort to merge the OS water and unfortunately they come with no indication of what type of water they are (ie. lake, river, stream, ditch etc.) I've made every effort t... | |
| 58099090 by Ailbhe18 | 1 | 2018-04-15 06:17:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Both of your new POI's are already mapped, 100 club as a POI node (Node: 100 Club (313349354), Koko's as a building (Way: Koko (225465155). Both are fully tagged/described so the new items are duplication and ought be removed. I can remove them if you wish.Rega... |
| 2 | 2018-04-20 09:10:56 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so duplicated info removed. | |
| 47629541 by felskia | 1 | 2018-04-20 06:56:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi the opening hours don't go with OSM best practice. Please see :- http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?setLng=enIs it possible to remedy this please?Regards. |
| 58171374 by Louishen | 1 | 2018-04-18 07:03:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, you've actually duplicated long parts of the miniature railway and it's also been joined in places to the abandoned railway. If the abandoned and the miniature railway occupy the same line then there should only be one line feature. If you need any help please just ask.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 21:30:02 UTC | Louishen | Thats a tricky oneIf you look at the ITO map for historical railways http://product.itoworld.com/map/26?lon=-5.06813&lat=50.36675&zoom=13&open_sidebar=clickthrough_wrapper&fullscreen=trueIt looks like the old Newquay to Chacewater line has got a missing section, or it sim... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-19 07:08:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you are undoubtedly correct and my comment is not directed against your information. The Way history shows you have inadvertently duplicated a section of the line. Please look at Way: Truro - Newquay Railway (110024265), from Benny Halt to a point 800m south this line is duplicated. That makes... | |
| 58172263 by Louishen | 1 | 2018-04-18 07:19:12 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, it looks like railway lines Way: 580907944 and Way: 580907943 have been dismantled. Thus not active sidings as you've indicated. Ought they to be tagged railway=dismantled?Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 21:22:03 UTC | Louishen | Missed that, now marked as dismantled.Thanks | |
| 58189379 by hairresolution | 1 | 2018-04-18 06:38:59 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Does HRTA replace Chic Unique, they are both hair salons at the same address? If so then the original POI ought to have been updated in order to keep OSM history intact. Certainly there should not be two POI for the same salon.Also a problem is that the manner ... |
| 58133369 by Hamish Drewry | 1 | 2018-04-16 12:59:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, no need to add the tag oneway=no to indicate a two way highway. In the absence of a oneway=yes tag, it is taken by renderers to mean a two way highway.Regards Bernard |
| 53217072 by Dragonmaster306 | 1 | 2018-04-15 13:41:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi I've placed the woods details on the woods outline.Regards Bernard |
| 58093779 by Ziggsi | 1 | 2018-04-14 18:44:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The data contained on your two POI is already contained on the buildings outline. Thus the new information is a duplication and not needed. I don't think you can remove the POI with GoMap so I've removed them for you.Regards Bernard |
| 58084725 by 0yasin | 1 | 2018-04-14 13:36:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It seems odd that you give so little information to help others find this place, an address would be helpful.Is this feature verifiable should others visit? If not it ought be removed. Regards Bernard |
| 57768983 by AsiaMassageLondon | 1 | 2018-04-03 13:08:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, a junction node for this POI is not correct.I suspect there is no geographical feature that is verifiable on the ground for the POI. Unless you can show the POI as verifiable then it ought be removed. |
| 2 | 2018-04-13 13:21:48 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so junction removed. | |
| 57984751 by mrpacmanmap | 1 | 2018-04-13 06:45:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you've added a new service road to this feature (G3 South Multi-Storey Carpark (578643437, v2)), It looks like it's joining ground and roof ways. With no levels indicated on the ways this seems to be incorrect. There must be internal ways between the ground level entrance and the roof level ways... |
| 58017876 by Trustman | 1 | 2018-04-12 06:57:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The pub building is already mapped and it is OSM practice to where possible tag an area/building. (A second feature/POI is then duplication.) Thus I've added more info and placed it all on the building outline. Regards Bernard |
| 57998245 by ultrasmile | 1 | 2018-04-11 12:31:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.There was already mapped a POI for the dentist so I've amalgamated all data onto one POI. I added amenity=dentist and adjusted the opening hours to OSM practice.I see the phone number differs from that on the website. Actually the webpage and facebook phone number... |
| 57325003 by SK53 | 1 | 2018-04-10 12:38:35 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, could you check Way: 571062876 http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-5.70342&lat=50.06261&zoom=18&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_waypretty sure it's accidentally mapped.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 14:34:06 UTC | SK53 | Feel free to delete it. Getting imagery to display for these islets proved a bit tricky in Potlatch | |
| 57698603 by Omer Levi | 1 | 2018-04-01 06:18:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Firstly tourism=attraction is not much use to folk if they are not told what the feature is, waterfall, statue etc.Then the tag name:he=פארק is also incorrect, the formal name of the area, even in Hebrew is not "park". The tag name=hampsted heat... |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 09:52:54 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so unneeded POI's removed. | |
| 57642757 by Hadditor | 1 | 2018-03-30 07:00:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It looks like your new park is over an area that contained several houses, roads and a chapel complete with graveyard. Were these features really removed for a park? If your additions are fiction then they are not needed in OSM and should be removed. Your respons... |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 09:47:11 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so fiction removed. | |
| 57920327 by crwgroves | 1 | 2018-04-10 08:57:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your car park POI are mostly a duplication of data that is already contained on the car park outlines. I've added any new data from your POI to the outlines plus some new data.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 18:24:19 UTC | crwgroves | Bernard,Apologies, please feel free to ignore my changes. I was trying to create a custom map in the vain of Google maps. I realised something wasn't quite right and stopped.Apologies for any inconvenience caused. Chris | |
| 57919345 by pedantico | 1 | 2018-04-10 07:09:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, a water feature does not have to have the tag natural=water unless of course it is a natural feature. The database recognises a dock as being water.Regards Bernard |
| 57919308 by pedantico | 1 | 2018-04-10 07:08:59 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, a water feature does not have to have the tag natural=water unless of course it is a natural feature. The database recognises a dock as being water.Regards Bernard |
| 57955758 by Mojtaba Al-Hoseine | 1 | 2018-04-10 06:31:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.You mapped both the building and a poi as the community centre duplicating information. I've placed the POI info onto the building outline.Regards Bernard |
| 57887947 by kkazaka | 1 | 2018-04-09 07:20:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, pub name corrected and added web and Instagram contact.Regards Bernard |
| 57887896 by kkazaka | 1 | 2018-04-09 07:08:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, HUSH clothes is not part of the shop name so I've removed the fiction.Regards Bernard |
| 57914874 by Slugster | 1 | 2018-04-08 15:43:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you've named two sections as Sager Way, should they be Sayer Way as well?Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2018-04-08 15:54:48 UTC | Slugster | Hi Bernard - many thanks. Yes! Typo there - I have now fixed it. Well spotted, sorry :( | |
| 57908345 by DennisLowestoft | 1 | 2018-04-08 11:09:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Verifiability, OSM data should, as far as is reasonably possible, be verifiable. The principle applies to tags and other aspects of data representation, and essentially means another mapper should be able to come to the same place and collect the same data ("... |
| 2 | 2018-04-08 21:13:44 UTC | DennisLowestoft | Hi Bernard,OK so I'm new here... and I'm only here because Pokémon Go now uses Open Street Map instead of Google Maps. With regard to the Bird Feeders, I was simply trying to add a point of interest (clutching at straws I know) that might one day become a Pokéstop. There are many in... | |
| 57896986 by TJS | 1 | 2018-04-08 06:56:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I notice you are mapping a lot of fences to go through the middle of buildings, this is completely wrong. In over 50 years in the building trade I've never seen a fence going through a house.Further a great many of these fences are duplicated (fence on-top of fence). I've never seen that done ... |
| 57873557 by mixkhe611 | 1 | 2018-04-07 06:24:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi I amended and added to the details. |
| 57872802 by mixkhe611 | 1 | 2018-04-07 06:05:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The Green (Way: The Green (25786204)), is already mapped in it's entirety and you have edited that way, thus I've removed your duplication.Regards Bernard. |
| 57855586 by kkazaka | 1 | 2018-04-06 13:22:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, it's the London Eye and it's already mapped.It's London Zoo and it's already mapped.Kensington Palace is already mapped.Hamleys is already mapped, if Paddington is really the name in Latvian please place it of the mapped building outline.Regards Bernard |
| 57855373 by kkazaka | 1 | 2018-04-06 13:08:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, these three POI are already in the OSM data base. Thus I have removed the duplication, placing any extra info from your POI onto the feature where appropriate.Regards Bernard |
| 57772538 by TAndroid | 1 | 2018-04-03 16:55:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The building names are on the building outlines so are not needed as separate POI, I've therefore removed the POI as being duplicated info.I also tagged the college grounds as amenity=college, this being OSM practice.Regards Bernard |
| 57693321 by Gordon Cooke | 1 | 2018-03-31 19:20:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Does Lakis Close go through the building? I suspect there should be a passageway here.I've made your new area into building=house rather than a landuse=residential and adjusted the original to accommodate the new house. Otherwise there would have been a buildin... |
| 2 | 2018-04-02 17:26:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've made a section of Lakis Close into a passageway.You mapped/tagged No9 as landuse residential, if it's a house it's not a land area. Thus I tagged it as a building=house and amended the original building outline so the house No9 was separated. Is this now correct? Or do you mean that the... | |
| 57740361 by JonPDavies | 1 | 2018-04-02 17:00:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You added Way: 575560951 as an area but do not add tags to describe what the area actually is. In this manner it has no meaning, could you please add descriptive tags?Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2018-04-03 12:22:45 UTC | JonPDavies | Hi BernardThanks for highlighting. I have hopefully added some descriptive tags. This is pretty new to me so hope it makes sense. Essentially it is the rough area we are planning to cover within a neighbourhood Plan as well as being the catchment area for the Residents Association. It is likely to... | |
| 57740502 by Will Chappell | 1 | 2018-04-02 16:40:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended the opening hours tag to suit OSM practice.Regards Bernard. |
| 57631250 by ubasche | 1 | 2018-03-29 12:05:23 UTC | Derick Rethans | Are you sure this postbox is on St. Gabriel's Road? |
| 2 | 2018-03-29 12:05:59 UTC | Derick Rethans | Sorry, *not* on St. Gabriel's Road | |
| 3 | 2018-03-29 13:50:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, it now looks like you've moved it into the back garden of a house. Must be special delivery and pick only. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-02 08:50:49 UTC | ubasche | I haven't changed any post boxes, at least not intentionally. It's not far, so I'll go there and have a look where the post box is. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-02 09:51:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi Thanks, you must have accidentally moved it from roughly the middle of St Gabriel's Road to the back garden.Regards. | |
| 6 | 2018-04-03 15:36:51 UTC | ubasche | There was no post box, so I removed it. | |
| 53217228 by Dragonmaster306 | 1 | 2018-04-02 07:58:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Dragonmaster306,The ways in this changeset are designated as permissive for foot use. Please see here :- http://www.highashfarm.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Walks-Map.jpgAlso please be sure before amending what is already mapped, you could easily ask the original mapper for verification ... |
| 57687264 by Neilos | 1 | 2018-03-31 13:44:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed your residential area additions as this whole area is already mapped as residential within Relation: 1966806 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1966806#map=15/52.0824/1.1319&layers=NRegards Bernard |
| 57640440 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2018-03-29 18:37:20 UTC | Infidellic33 | Hi there, thanks for looking over this. It's not exactly clear to me (newbie) what you've changed, can you clarify what and why for me?Many thanks |
| 2 | 2018-03-29 18:54:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi,I added addr:country=GB to facilitate worldwide search, (OSM is a worldwide database).Removed payment:coins=yes, not needed as covered by payment:cash=yes.Removed payment:credit_cards=yes as this is not specifically recognized as individual card types are recognized, (amex, visa etc.).Rem... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-30 10:13:33 UTC | Infidellic33 | Thanks for getting back to me. That all makes sense and I appreciate you fixing it up. Thank you | |
| 57635983 by Lia Bintancour Iglesias | 1 | 2018-03-29 17:08:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for your addition to OSM, the hotel building is already tagged so as the POI is duplication, I have put your new data on the building. Regards Bernard |
| 57601535 by kkazaka | 1 | 2018-03-28 15:22:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM is a live worldwide database from which folk compile maps. There are other places to test or see how things work but please do not corrupt the live database. Your life may one day depend on this data being correct.Thus I have reverted your changes, removing... |
| 57598502 by J O111111111 | 1 | 2018-03-28 13:33:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Changes reverted. |
| 57592944 by J O111111111 | 1 | 2018-03-28 13:26:12 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM is a live worldwide database from which folk compile maps. There are other places to test or see how things work but please do not corrupt the live database. Your life may one day depend on this data being correct.Thus I have reverted your changes, removing... |
| 57564199 by bustosc | 1 | 2018-03-27 18:06:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.There's a lot to learn about OSM best practice a great deal of info is online.It's better to correct what is mapped rather than just delete things because you find them wrong. I've reinstated that building and adjusted the school perimeter, it's now outside the... |
| 57498860 by malazlar | 1 | 2018-03-25 07:41:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I'm glad to see you thought twice about adding fiction (den) to the OSM live worldwide database. Unfortunately you inadvertently dragged a path and road out of place, this could have seriously disrupted routing in the area. No problem though, I have reverted ... |
| 57496891 by DonnaDee | 1 | 2018-03-25 07:27:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended the building to better describe Gaunson House.Also made the studio a POI as it's only one unit in Gaunson House. Amended and added to your studio data. The amendments conform to OSM best practice.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2018-03-25 11:06:48 UTC | DonnaDee | Hi. Thanks. But it's actually 3 separate, large units containing over 70 spaces within Gaunson House. It also spans a much greater area, which I had previously shown. I think it needs to be amended back to how it was shown previously. | |
| 57449100 by Parks_Trust | 1 | 2018-03-24 13:23:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, does the grass and woodland in this changeset really extend to the center lines of the highways? If not then your areas should be corrected as it is not a true and verifiable representation of what is on the ground. It's also sometimes very difficult to untangle areas from a highway, especially ... |
| 57461733 by Parks_Trust | 1 | 2018-03-24 13:20:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, does the grass and woodland in this changeset really extend to the center lines of the highways? If not then your areas should be corrected as it is not a true and verifiable representation of what is on the ground. It's also sometimes very difficult to untangle areas from a highway, especially ... |
| 57468047 by Poplar Vets | 1 | 2018-03-23 20:00:35 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I had made all the necessary adjustments for you, your further editing resulted in two POI.I have removed the duplicate POI so all is now as it should be. No further editing is needed.Regards Bernard |
| 57466000 by Poplar Vets | 1 | 2018-03-23 19:46:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You inadvertently added your vets data to the whole building.No problem though I've made a POI for the vets. I made amendments to your data so that it conforms with OSM best practice.I hope this is OK.Regards Bernard. |
| 57180272 by Katerinaazarova | 1 | 2018-03-15 13:47:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, aquaculture is the farming of produce on water, please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=aquacultureCould you say what is produced here and why it is named Seals please?Regards |
| 2 | 2018-03-22 07:48:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, no response so feature removed. I can find no aquaculture here. | |
| 57180968 by Katerinaazarova | 1 | 2018-03-15 13:31:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you've tagged a single node as building=yesname=Vanity, CamhsIn effect that's a building within a building which is not best practice. Could you explain what Vanity, Camhs is please?Regards |
| 2 | 2018-03-22 07:45:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, no response so I've removed the building=yes tag. Could you please properly tag the feature?Regards | |
| 3 | 2018-03-28 02:43:53 UTC | DeBigC | I think CAMHS is a child and adult mental health service. There are a bunch of offices "off street" in those buildings, but no traces on Mapillary assist. https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/list/4/mental-health-services/camhs/ | |
| 57378402 by ruskiny | 1 | 2018-03-21 13:39:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You inadvertently added the memorial data to the park boundary. No problem though I figured it out and have added the memorial to the north end of the park area.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2018-03-21 20:40:09 UTC | ruskiny | Thank you Bernard | |
| 57355183 by SandraSJ | 1 | 2018-03-21 07:21:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The school was tagged as disused, (on school boundary tags).I've tagged the school to current OSM best practice, placing the feature and address tags on the perimeter of the school grounds. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_2016_Q1_Project:_S... |
| 57327281 by International Circus Stardust Entertainment | 1 | 2018-03-19 20:08:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. For your data to be acceptable for inclusion in the OSM database it must be verifiable on the ground to other mappers. It doesn't look like your business has a physical presence at this area. Your website does not give an address. Thus your data ought be removed... |
| 2 | 2018-03-19 21:23:16 UTC | International Circus Stardust Entertainment | Hi Bernard,Thank you for your reply.To tell you the truth, I’m not totally sure how OpenStreetMap works. I thought it was something like Google maps or IOS maps. I was just trying to promote my business.You are correct that my business does not have any physical presence at the address. ... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-20 08:35:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Shaun, I see and accept from your link that you operate the business from that address. However, this can only be a virtual address, which is what you say.The problem for OSM is that features ought to be verifiable on the ground. I quote from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practi... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-20 19:30:18 UTC | International Circus Stardust Entertainment | Hi Bernard,I live and work from Hastings, on the sunny south coast. I recently deiced to get a registered business address for my company, Kemp House, 152 – 160 City Road, London. The reason I did this was to give my company a more professional appearance. I only recently came across Open ... | |
| 5 | 2018-03-22 19:04:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,OpenStreetMap isn't a business directory - as Bernard said, it's designed for things that are geographically verifiable. For example, the Moorfields Eye Hospital is verifiable by anyone (there are lots of signs for it) but if you've just got a mailing address in a building on the City Road the... | |
| 57300201 by Sergiu Chitoroaga | 1 | 2018-03-19 07:45:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The shelter you added to the OSM live worldwide database looks like it might be fiction. I doubt if the transport authority would want tourists in the middle of a roundabout nor would they allow building of a shelter here.Unless you can verify the shelter it ou... |
| 57127363 by mrpacmanmap | 1 | 2018-03-18 08:31:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Tom, I'm sure those fences do not go through those houses. Thus the mapping is incorrect.It's very easy to map the fences each side of the buildings, and even better to terrace the buildings. Then the the fences can more accurately be aligned to the buildings. I've corrected a few at the cor... |
| 56898937 by Freedom Wheelchair Skills | 1 | 2018-03-17 09:34:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I added your wheelchair info to the pub POI. Regards |
| 57250949 by sddssdsddds | 1 | 2018-03-16 20:18:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Could you show how the footpath goes through the two buildings please? Tunnel, passage, bridge? Would this path be open to the public or is it private/restricted use? One then wonders if the park is also private, it would be useful if you could determine this.R... |
| 57219374 by Gerard Butler | 1 | 2018-03-16 08:59:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, by deleting a feature you throw away all the mapping history. Far better to amend the existing feature and keep the history. I've reverted this change and marked/tagged the building as disused:name=Tesco Metroshop=vacant. In this way you convey the new facts and keep the previous facts in the ... |
| 2 | 2018-03-16 09:28:49 UTC | Gerard Butler | Thanks again - that did occur to me in the aftermath and will take that on board. Appreciate your help. | |
| 57219133 by Gerard Butler | 1 | 2018-03-16 08:46:59 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, why remove the name,and all the descriptive and address tags listed below?Regards addr:city=Londonaddr:housenumber=30addr:postcode=SE13 7HAaddr:street=Engate Streetdescription=Trade outletname=PTS Plumbing and Heatingwebsite=http://www.ptsplumbing.co.uk/store/7927?lat=51.441... |
| 2 | 2018-03-16 08:53:36 UTC | Gerard Butler | Now restored - thanks again for your help. | |
| 57222847 by tomt2171 | 1 | 2018-03-16 07:55:51 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Music Center, main building drawn and POI info placed on it. |
| 57222557 by tomt2171 | 1 | 2018-03-16 07:39:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed the PE Block POI because the name tag on the poi is already tagged on the building outline. thus the name was duplicated.Same with the Media Suite and Science Block.I also tweaked building outlines, then re-formed the Science Block relation to OS... |
| 57216089 by BrendanOm | 1 | 2018-03-15 16:53:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you somehow duplicated sections of way, I've removed the duplication keeping the route intact.Regards Bernard |
| 57213705 by Gerard Butler | 1 | 2018-03-15 16:28:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. When the building is drawn and it has a sole or main occupier it's best to tag the building outline rather than add a POI.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2018-03-15 17:48:49 UTC | Gerard Butler | Many thanks Bernard, will look to change as soon as possible | |
| 57213165 by Iain Gear | 1 | 2018-03-15 16:13:29 UTC | BCNorwich | West Maldon Recreation Ground, I've added back landuse=recreation_ground |
| 57179744 by Katerinaazarova | 1 | 2018-03-15 15:32:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed "name=playground" I doubt the name is playground. |
| 57179879 by Katerinaazarova | 1 | 2018-03-15 15:25:42 UTC | BCNorwich | What is named The Gap? |
| 57179977 by Katerinaazarova | 1 | 2018-03-15 15:23:30 UTC | BCNorwich | What is the aquaculture? |
| 57180080 by Katerinaazarova | 1 | 2018-03-15 15:13:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've changed this to footway, as it's a footway each end this would block horse use. I doubt if a rider would wish to take a horse over there anyway. |
| 57180179 by Katerinaazarova | 1 | 2018-03-15 13:54:29 UTC | BCNorwich | attraction=animalname=RabbitsIs the feature and it's name verifiable to everyone on the ground? If it is actually a warren then there are better tags. |
| 57181276 by Katerinaazarova | 1 | 2018-03-15 13:16:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Data consolidated on building outline. |
| 57179597 by Katerinaazarova | 1 | 2018-03-15 13:13:44 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, your newly added housing estate area, (area way is not described,the node tagged name=housing estate is incorrect, that's not the proper name), is within an already mapped residential area. Thus it's an unnecessary duplication that can be removed. Regards Bernard. |
| 57191568 by ExcitedPixels | 1 | 2018-03-15 07:30:15 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.As you've mapped an area there's no need for an additional POI. I've placed the POI data on the area. The database recognizes a feature tagged shop as an area so no need for the area=yes tag.Hope that's OK Regards Bernard. |
| 57199034 by Amit Panday | 1 | 2018-03-15 07:15:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This area is already within an area mapped as residential so your new tagging is unneeded duplication. Thus I have reverted it to the original tag of recreation, there is some sort of park or recreational area here.Regards Bernard |
| 57168762 by thewhoshop | 1 | 2018-03-14 14:04:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your new data was placed on an address tag only, so gave no indication of a shop. Your new data is somewhat duplicating a shop POI mapped 3 years ago by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/The%20Who%20Shop.To avoid confusion I've amassed all data on the existi... |
| 57147960 by BCBRENDA | 1 | 2018-03-13 16:23:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM is a live worldwide database from which folk make their map. It looks like you have inadvertently added a whole lot of fiction that could seriously disrupted the database. Could you please remove the fiction? If you need help adding genuine features or remo... |
| 57086139 by BRiley99 | 1 | 2018-03-11 17:18:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I un-joined the field area from the center line of the road, (fields don't extend to the road center line, or right over the road). The field is arable land and grass is a rotated crop on arable land.Regards Bernard |
| 57075917 by martindlewis | 1 | 2018-03-11 10:24:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.unfortunately your construction area is un-tagged and one section doesn't encircle an area. It thus serves no purpose.There's no Costa shop where you've placed the POI but the is one on the High Street somewhere.Could you please rectify these problems? If you... |
| 57038976 by Coblynau | 1 | 2018-03-09 20:29:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, in the absence of an intermittent tag the OSM database defaults to presuming the feature is not intermittent. Thus the tag intermittent=no is not necessary. In most cases negative tags are not needed and if added would only serve to bloat the database. Regards Bernard. |
| 57038576 by Coblynau | 1 | 2018-03-09 20:20:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reinstated the main building so that when amended it keeps the history, this is as per OSM best practice.If a feature has been mapped wrong, or it's outline or tagging/description has changed, it's best if the original mapping is amended rather than delete... |
| 57029755 by cbjltd | 1 | 2018-03-09 15:01:51 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think you've placed this POI in the wrong place. If you need any help just ask.Regards Bernard |
| 56998632 by vuyomon | 1 | 2018-03-08 16:43:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi park boundary does not extend to road center line, adjusted. |
| 56994845 by henrysmurf | 1 | 2018-03-08 15:57:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, that pub was already mapped with a POI.I've drawn in the building and put both POI info there. Regards |
| 56789581 by Rikygranger1 | 1 | 2018-03-01 18:22:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Not quite conventional OSM mapping, the references to amenity=police must surely be fiction.Indoor mapping is very comlicated and wouldn't really work for an unsegregated part of a building. Besides this indoor mapping is not to OSM convention and thus of n... |
| 2 | 2018-03-07 19:15:55 UTC | BCNorwich | OK, I've removed the incorrect mapping and terraced the building. Thus your house is now mapped. Regards Bernard | |
| 56728077 by Hydrahh Designs | 1 | 2018-02-27 20:08:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It's not enough to map an area without placing tags to describe the area, thus it is unrecognizable to the database and serves no purpose. Further your area is located over a large varied area, it frankly looks like fiction and if such should be removed. If I can... |
| 2 | 2018-03-07 19:08:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Fiction now removed! | |
| 56898853 by Freedom Wheelchair Skills | 1 | 2018-03-05 11:55:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've placed your new wheelchair info on the building outline, added the car park and disabled space.Regards Bernard |
| 56896961 by RNP01 | 1 | 2018-03-05 11:40:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've repositioned your POI from the street to as near as I can inside your building. Also added the websiteRegards Bernard |
| 56885281 by kj54mcd | 1 | 2018-03-05 07:12:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.There's a lot to learn about OSM before mapping can be effective, a good place to start is here :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcomeYour POI has a few problems. It is close to the middle of a road when it obviously refers to a building. I doubt if the nam... |
| 56860762 by ADepic | 1 | 2018-03-04 07:20:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Sorry to say both attempts at adding data are incorrect. Firstly they are both in the middle of the road. Both have name=260, (260 is the number). One POI has addr:housenumber=Ipswich, (Ipswich is the city/town).I've removed the two POI so no harm is done. ... |
| 56845467 by ispo21 | 1 | 2018-03-03 18:22:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.There are no pharmacys at those two locations so I've removed the POI. If you need help adding features please just ask.Regards Bernard |
| 56843335 by FotoGianno | 1 | 2018-03-03 13:20:51 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Curry Nights is already mapped over the road, so I've removed your incorrectly placed POI putting your wheelchair data on the existing building.Regards Bernard |
| 56845020 by MattAnsellUK | 1 | 2018-03-03 13:14:51 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, POI data placed on building outline.Regards Bernard |
| 56844023 by MattAnsellUK | 1 | 2018-03-03 13:07:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've placed the building POI data on the building outline, as per OSM practice.Regards Bernard. |
| 56827613 by Egle Trento | 1 | 2018-03-02 18:20:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.A few problems, I've remove a single untagged node. The school POI information is already on the school boundary, this is OSM practice. so I've removed the school POI.The office POI is placed in the middle of the road. I can't see where this ought to be, ... |
| 56753605 by binarytemple | 1 | 2018-02-28 13:19:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Capacity 0? If you're not sure then don't say zero.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2018-02-28 13:53:44 UTC | binarytemple | Hi Bernard - place has no seating - it's queue, choose, pay, and leave. No eating on the premises. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-28 14:46:45 UTC | BCNorwich | My apologies I hadn't realised it was takeaway only.Cheers | |
| 4 | 2018-02-28 15:38:18 UTC | binarytemple | nah - thanks for taking the time to check - it's all for the better. | |
| 56705067 by Moaps | 1 | 2018-02-27 07:23:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, several problems. Duplication of footpaths. Paths going to field outline rather than extending to road. Duplication of areas. New areas on top of existing areas without adjusting the existing areas (school). |
| 2 | 2018-02-27 07:29:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Sorry the above looks a bit abrupt, I just wish to bring these points to your attention. New mapping is always welcome but it's best to be slow and sure. Regards Bernard | |
| 56698095 by SonriaDentalClinic | 1 | 2018-02-26 18:53:35 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed your hospital tag so as not to give a false impression. A dental clinic is not a hospital facility.Regards Bernard |
| 56689650 by Djingostarr | 1 | 2018-02-26 14:23:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You added some park areas that are duplicated within existing parks. Also a park that extended way to far which I think is fiction. No to worry though I think I've fixed all the problems this caused. Please read up on the OSM guidance before adding more features ... |
| 2 | 2018-02-26 17:29:34 UTC | Djingostarr | Hello Bernard, Thank you very much for your help! I was struggling to use the tools so your help is much appreciated. What I was actually trying to do is to expand the defined green areas on the map slightly because they are actually bigger in real life. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-26 18:41:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, if you would like to point out one area and explain where it should be expanded I could have a look. Bernard | |
| 56691522 by Kanat Nurkin | 1 | 2018-02-26 18:00:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to point out a few things on your recent mapping.Diana B&B this POI is placed between two buildings with no address or building it's difficult to work out it's position.London Bridge POI, this is actually Tower bridge and is already tagg... |
| 56674476 by Phoebe Zhang | 1 | 2018-02-26 07:16:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Is your water_point drinking water, is so then the tag amenity=drinking_water would convey the fact that the water is suitable for drinking.Regards Bernard |
| 56663737 by helenwf | 1 | 2018-02-25 19:26:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've revised your tagging to natural=tree rather than leisure=park as I think your intention is to map the tree. I wonder if the tree is actually formally named 'Blossom Tree' if not then that name, being fiction, should be removed.Regards Bernard |
| 56660221 by Totisso | 1 | 2018-02-25 13:35:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There,You've got the house building outlines extending over both the fron and back gardens. The building outline should end on the extremity of the actual building. Also some buildings outlines, (both houses and garages) are joined, some are unjoined and some are overlapping. It's far better... |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 13:36:33 UTC | BCNorwich | I forgot to say Welcome to OpenStreetMap. | |
| 56607512 by Lessia | 1 | 2018-02-23 13:16:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You inadvertently added an undescribed area to the live worldwide database, altering a couple of features. I reverted the change so there's no harm done. If you need help adding a feature please just ask. Regards Bernard |
| 56535895 by JP561 | 1 | 2018-02-23 07:45:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Fiction reverted. |
| 56547746 by Rajamangala | 1 | 2018-02-21 14:11:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The garden is already mapped so I've removed the duplicate.Regards Bernard |
| 56325012 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2018-02-20 21:24:35 UTC | Borbus | Sure this is a biergarten (German style) or is it a British style beer garden? |
| 2 | 2018-02-21 07:49:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hmmm, well actually this one looks more like a continental type of garden where beer is drunk. It's a small enclosed outside area crammed with picnic tables specifically for drinking/eating. My idea of a typical English beer garden is an open garden area for family's to relax in and where beer is a... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-21 18:34:03 UTC | Borbus | I suppose the main difference is the biergarten actually *is* the pub, while these type of beer gardens are just attached to a pub. You get your beer inside then come out to drink it. But I agree that the description sounds a lot more like a biergarten than a nice English one. Times change indeed... | |
| 56523947 by sfckresearch+1 | 1 | 2018-02-20 18:59:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed this building as it was a duplication.Regards Bernard |
| 56524978 by pk001 | 1 | 2018-02-20 18:49:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed several instances of the tagging name=house and name=building as these names are not verifiable (fiction). Please read up on OSM best practice.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2018-02-20 18:53:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Your contributions to OSM are most welcome but we must all strive to keep the database correct and verifiable thus OSM maps will continue as the best in the world. | |
| 56524816 by pk001 | 1 | 2018-02-20 18:43:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I removed the name=house as that's not likely the house name. Also removed the building outline from describing the building's shadow as well as the building. |
| 56524303 by pk001 | 1 | 2018-02-20 18:38:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've retagged the POI as natural=tree, (as per OSM practice). Also removed the area.Regards BernardMay I respectfully suggest you read up a bit in order to give the best of your ability to the OSM project. |
| 56524135 by pk001 | 1 | 2018-02-20 18:30:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, your play area was in a car park and not tagged as per OSM best practice. No problem I've removed it, just wanted to let you be aware.Regards Bernard |
| 56523951 by pk001 | 1 | 2018-02-20 18:28:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you inadvertently duplicated a building. No problem I've removed it, just wanted to let you be aware.Regards Bernard |
| 56506470 by W_Tudway | 1 | 2018-02-20 07:44:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've drawn the church building and put your POI tags on it.Regards Bernard |
| 56488947 by Mark Latimer | 1 | 2018-02-19 12:53:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I looked at your addition to OSM because I noticed you had inadvertantly dragged a bollard out of place to the middle of the canal. This is replaced so all is well there. I've also drawn in the area of your center and placed the your tags on the outline. Hope thi... |
| 56460927 by WandaBodnar | 1 | 2018-02-18 13:17:31 UTC | BCNorwich | Web link removed as it has nothing to do with the building. |
| 56368468 by mrpacmanmap | 1 | 2018-02-18 07:33:31 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there, I'm pretty sure the fences don't go through the middle of these buildings. I've rectified a few of them, perhaps you could rectify the rest please. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2018-02-18 07:42:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I notice there are several duplicated sections of fence as well.Regards Bernard | |
| 56445283 by ParkLyfe | 1 | 2018-02-17 17:53:12 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, it is a small area of woodland next to the road, not a park. |
| 2 | 2018-02-28 10:44:35 UTC | ParkLyfe | It was a spawn point and now it's not. Someone in Harlow is messing with the map the improve pokemon go for themselves and ruin it for others. They have removed virtually all the "park" spawns. I am simply restoring them to maleness or fair for all again. The Dashes park and play field is ... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-28 10:45:37 UTC | ParkLyfe | Make it* | |
| 56434682 by FS06 | 1 | 2018-02-17 13:04:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reverted your recent changes to OSM. I think you may be unaware that you deleted a lot of artwork POI's from the area. All is now well but please be careful and not upload changes till you're sure of what's happening.Regards Bernard |
| 56415991 by theshoreditchspa | 1 | 2018-02-16 17:37:59 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reinstated the building=yes tag as I suspect the feature is still a building. If the shop doesn't occupy the whole building then it ought to be represented by a POI node placed within the building. You might also consider keeping the building address on the ... |
| 56278024 by ChaseStein | 1 | 2018-02-16 10:13:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Fiction removed! |
| 56377981 by Al Brookbanks | 1 | 2018-02-15 14:15:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for your contribution to OSM. Using disused is the OSM best practice, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:But you weren't to know that. I've changed the tags and added a link and note to show the changes (in case anyone re maps the pub). ... |
| 56368511 by Jamescahil | 1 | 2018-02-15 08:30:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Reverted fiction. Please see previous comment regarding fiction. |
| 2 | 2018-02-15 08:40:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Please have a look at this map it looks like the perfect place for your mapping :-http://opengeofiction.net/#map=5/56.072/-3.252This OpenStreetMap database is a live worldwide operation and your actions here are disruptive. You may one day rely on the information here being accurate. | |
| 56368333 by JP561 | 1 | 2018-02-15 08:33:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Reverted fiction. Please see previous comment regarding fiction. |
| 2 | 2018-02-15 08:40:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Please have a look at this map it looks like the perfect place for your mapping :-http://opengeofiction.net/#map=5/56.072/-3.252This OpenStreetMap database is a live worldwide operation and your actions here are disruptive. You may one day rely on the information here being accurate. | |
| 56368601 by kimboo | 1 | 2018-02-15 08:26:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It's really unfortunate that your first edit has gone a bit awry, but please don't let that deter you. Just have a look here first :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guideProblems, neither of the added nodes was tagged as a tree. The London n... |
| 56350100 by Jamescahil | 1 | 2018-02-14 11:39:24 UTC | BCNorwich | Fiction reverted, please respond to previous comment. |
| 56343209 by JP561 | 1 | 2018-02-14 07:48:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You may not be aware that OSM is a live worldwide database used worldwide to compile maps. It is critical that we only have genuine verifiable data in our database.I can appreciate that it is fun to make up maps such as you are doing but OSM is not the correc... |
| 56343503 by Jamescahil | 1 | 2018-02-14 07:47:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You may not be aware that OSM is a live worldwide database used worldwide to compile maps. It is critical that we only have genuine verifiable data in our database.I can appreciate that it is fun to make up maps such as you are doing but OSM is not the correc... |
| 56294495 by SierraAlfa | 1 | 2018-02-12 15:11:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The park area you added is already mapped as a park in this relation :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21877#map=15/52.0635/1.1558&layers=NThus unfortunately your addition duplicates part of the park (park inside a park) and can be removed. If you... |
| 56251567 by Master Mong | 1 | 2018-02-12 08:32:07 UTC | BCNorwich | The fiction is removed. |
| 56109752 by Master Mong | 1 | 2018-02-12 07:39:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed the park inside the park, (duplication). Removed one section of duplicate path. Tagged paths and joined them.Regards Bernard |
| 55810083 by XxPalfxX | 1 | 2018-02-11 08:43:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the circle area is not a park. There is no invitation extended in any way for recreation in that area, it's part of the cemetery and should be respected as such. At best it ought be described as a garden area within the cemetery. Also the garden does not extend to the center line of the service ... |
| 56210748 by MarkTwd | 1 | 2018-02-09 10:32:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, but the cycle-way does join to the first carriageway. So I've reconnected it.Regards |
| 2 | 2018-02-09 10:46:47 UTC | MarkTwd | Trouble is no one has set the bus/cycle lane it "connects" to and your endpoint then throws some system routings out as it sees the cycle lane as blocking the carriageway, i.e. not connecting to the edge but as crossing that carriageway.....makes taxi fare quotes expensive for one thing as... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-09 11:08:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi OK I've added cycle lane to the section of carriageway. With or without the cycle lane on Elizabeth Way it shouldn't make any difference at all to any vehicle routing. There are problems with several routing softwares so several routing softwares ought be tried before concluding there is a proble... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-09 11:50:28 UTC | MarkTwd | Hi,Thanks for the quick reply, my position was based on feedback from 2 local taxi companies and a courier that told me independently that the issue was at openstreetmap not their software (obv they would say that though), but I do understand what you say.That said, whatever the rationale behind... | |
| 5 | 2018-02-09 12:40:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, good to know some improvement has been made. Would you like to email me with the remaining problem, I may be able to help.Regards Bernard | |
| 56081842 by Woodsy2907 | 1 | 2018-02-09 07:23:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Fiction removed. |
| 56146115 by Adrian Cooper | 1 | 2018-02-07 13:07:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Could you give more details about the defibrillator please? This link might help :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3DdefibrillatorIt seems to be positioned near to the street but not attached to a feature. A location tag could describe a posi... |
| 2 | 2018-02-07 22:25:03 UTC | Adrian Cooper | Sorry, can't work out how to add more information despite looking at the link. It is in a secure cabinet on the front of The Crown Public House. Combination given when dialling 999. Hope this helps, Adrian | |
| 3 | 2018-02-08 08:31:58 UTC | BCNorwich | That's OK Adrian, I've re-positioned the feature and added location, phone and access detail.Does the cabinet have a reference number please?Regards Bernard | |
| 56153544 by Tsaka | 1 | 2018-02-07 18:04:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, It seems unlikely that a point on a building is named 'My Letter Box'. Is it meant to be an entrance? If you need help please just ask.Regards Bernard. |
| 56153515 by Tsaka | 1 | 2018-02-07 18:01:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed the pool as you've inadvertently placed it over several gardens. Either that or you've completely misplaced it. If you need help mapping anything please just ask.Regards Bernard. |
| 56091661 by Lewis_Morg | 1 | 2018-02-06 08:04:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there, I just wanted to let you know that your buildings would look a lot neater if they were squared up (this and other changesets). You can do this in the iD editor, right click on a building outline, click on the square symbol.Regards Bernard. |
| 56064698 by Kangaroony | 1 | 2018-02-06 07:53:35 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, Do the grass areas really extend to the center lines of these highways. I have not seen this, grass verges/roadside areas usually stop at the road side or even just before. A better tag for grassed areas such as these is landuse=grass or natural=grassland, both of these tags are rendered ... |
| 2 | 2018-02-06 11:18:31 UTC | Kangaroony | Hello Bernard,Thanks for the advice, it is a work in progress, just wanted to get the basic framing in using my gps traces, then go from there.I didn't realise about the landuse tag, I'll change them as I replace them.RegardsColin | |
| 56079351 by Bevvers | 1 | 2018-02-05 18:45:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your addition of a node only did not contribute any meaningful data to OSM. I have taken the liberty to draw the building and add descriptive tags from the website. I hope that's OK, if anything needs altering please go ahead or ask via these comments for help.... |
| 56071331 by multimonthloans | 1 | 2018-02-05 07:20:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have amended the tags, removed advertising and re-positioned your POI. |
| 55912338 by mobivatebrad | 1 | 2018-02-04 08:30:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Intrigued, 2nd what? |
| 55815790 by matt_brk | 1 | 2018-01-28 07:28:31 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just wanted to let you know that gates (Node: 5366894203 and Node: 5366894204) are not connected to the path, so do not pose a barrier to that way. I've squared up the houses at Peregrine Close and adjusted the land areas.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2018-02-04 07:28:58 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so adjustments made. | |
| 56033061 by HughJarres | 1 | 2018-02-03 17:38:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.A better descriptive tag for the buildings would be building=apartments.Regards Bernard |
| 55823216 by XxPalfxX | 1 | 2018-02-03 17:20:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you don't have park areas in cemetery's. I've redrawn the area inside the circular service road to separate it from the road and tagged it as grass.Regards Bernard |
| 55681056 by Chloé Htjs | 1 | 2018-01-23 13:21:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.With no description to these outlines the database does not know what they are. They'll thus be ignored. If the features are dwellings then building=house will allow the outlines to be rendered. In Potlatch2 left panel click "unknown" from the drop down... |
| 2 | 2018-02-03 17:05:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, no response so I've tidied up the buildings and tagged the as residential.Regards | |
| 55996514 by blueveracity | 1 | 2018-02-02 18:38:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.An area can be described in OSM with all its attributes. So this area is both woodland and park.I think it may be that only a small part of the area mapped is actually Birchwood Nature Park, (and it would include the grassy area as well). The larger area bein... |
| 55993659 by Ian Keech | 1 | 2018-02-02 18:00:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed your POI because the information is duplication, the info is contained in the area outline tagging.Regards Bernard |
| 55916041 by KraZerrr1 | 1 | 2018-01-31 07:38:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I notice your pond is not shown on any images that I can find. In fact the area is house gardens.Believing it fiction I've removed the pond, if I'm wrong I apologise but please show how your information of the pond existing is verifiable.Regards Bernard. |
| 55900430 by ipiddock | 1 | 2018-01-30 19:00:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You assumed correctly that the node/way-point was incorrectly positioned. Only with a lot more experience would you be aware that the node had been dragged away from it's original position. Thus resulting in the anomaly you saw on the map.The node represented a... |
| 55883500 by mobivatebrad | 1 | 2018-01-30 08:34:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended your POI tagging to OSM best practice. The database will now better interpret the info. I could not find the credit card type (visa, mastercard) you accept so you could amend that.Regards Bernard |
| 55809248 by XxPalfxX | 1 | 2018-01-27 19:30:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I removed the park area from in the cemetery and removed the park tag from the cemetery.Regards Bernard |
| 55802041 by Dan Watkins | 1 | 2018-01-27 16:58:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've made amendments to the two recreation grounds, The Green and pond. Also removed the glacier, the glaciers receded from the UK quite some time ago.Regards Bernard |
| 55767431 by ordella ragel | 1 | 2018-01-27 07:43:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I'm sorry to say that you are probably inadvertently doing very poor edits to OSM. Over several edits.From a brief look you are duplicating features, then incorrectly tagging them. My advice would be to please take time out to learn OSM best practice. Go thro... |
| 2 | 2018-01-27 12:11:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Remove duplicate building. | |
| 55767403 by ordella ragel | 1 | 2018-01-27 12:09:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Remove duplicated buildings. |
| 55767376 by ordella ragel | 1 | 2018-01-27 12:08:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Remove duplicate building. |
| 55767348 by ordella ragel | 1 | 2018-01-27 12:05:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Remove duplicate building. |
| 55767311 by ordella ragel | 1 | 2018-01-27 12:03:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Remove duplicated building. |
| 55767268 by ordella ragel | 1 | 2018-01-27 12:02:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Remove duplicated building. |
| 55767239 by ordella ragel | 1 | 2018-01-27 12:01:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Remove duplicate building. |
| 55767222 by ordella ragel | 1 | 2018-01-27 12:00:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Remove duplicated building. |
| 55767162 by ordella ragel | 1 | 2018-01-27 11:57:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Retag car park, remove name=Car Park, remove unnecessary area tag. |
| 55767044 by ordella ragel | 1 | 2018-01-27 09:03:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Add business POI, and address.Removed two undescribed areas (looked like building duplication's. |
| 55617833 by fonzeyyy | 1 | 2018-01-21 07:31:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Is this really a playground? It looks like a delivery/loading area for B&Q. You've drawn it over a building and gates and walls. could you please verify the feature or re-position it if a mistake has been made?Please respond here to confirm or deny.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2018-01-25 13:23:24 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so I've removed the feature. | |
| 55650807 by jæwesome | 1 | 2018-01-22 17:54:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the leisure=park tag needs to go on an area to be meaningful, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark |
| 55650130 by jæwesome | 1 | 2018-01-22 14:54:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've tagged the barrier as bollards and joined the barrier to the way. Thus the OSM database can recognize the bollards as interrupting passage along the way. Added foot and cycle as allowed traffic through the barrier.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2018-01-22 22:10:27 UTC | jæwesome | excellent, in my yank mind bollards are usually the barrier bars on a pivot. I glanced thru but that is clearly a better classification. I also swore I checked foot & cycle but no cars. cheers, good catches | |
| 55529803 by Silens | 1 | 2018-01-21 09:26:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, The footpath crosses some highways (Croft Street, Newtownlands Road) but you've not shown how this is achieved. Does the path bridge the other ways or join to them?Regards Bernard |
| 55426679 by Silens | 1 | 2018-01-21 09:22:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I was wondering why you've drawn a park over a residential area, a mistake? Also the footways don't look logical not joining properly, one a duplication of a service road. Then another drawn over the houses. Has the area recently been redeveloped?Regards Bernard |
| 55617848 by fonzeyyy | 1 | 2018-01-21 07:42:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Pub, bowling green and car park drawn to match Bing image, Reason is I don't think the green should go over the pub.Regards Bernard. |
| 55617664 by fonzeyyy | 1 | 2018-01-21 07:24:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I made a few alterations at the church hope that's OK. Drew chuch building and used your tags to describe it, expanded the St. abbreviations. Adjusted graveyard and adjoining area tagged it as graveyard and removed the park tag.Regards Bernard |
| 55587420 by fcrump | 1 | 2018-01-20 07:43:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I separated two areas of wood on this Way: 103019123, (they're don't look joined by a thin self intersecting line).Regards Bernard |
| 55584900 by Mihai Ghita | 1 | 2018-01-19 19:46:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The building is already tagged as Brent Cross Shopping Centre. I've removed the POI as it duplicates information. Regards Bernard |
| 55575481 by Gaby Monteen | 1 | 2018-01-19 14:23:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your POI for the takeaway is in the middle of the road, I wonder if you could better place it, preferably map a building and place the as precise as you can. I have capitalised the letters in the post code.Regards Bernard |
| 55527930 by PathfinderNE | 1 | 2018-01-19 11:18:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I looked at the parking areas with a view to suggesting that they be unjoined from the road center line. But I see you are making great strides in advancing your knowledge of OSM. It's not usually good practice to join areas to highways as the highway line is the center line and not the edge ... |
| 2 | 2018-01-19 20:23:30 UTC | PathfinderNE | Well I am still learning!! It took me quite a while to work out how to get to this to be able to reply as it doesn't show in my messages.As you have seen, I had realised that it wasn't a good idea to connect these parking areas to the road and it took me a few attempts to separate them includi... | |
| 55532915 by FTOPETE | 1 | 2018-01-18 07:50:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, The name is a park, the area has been designated a County Wildlife Site by the Suffolk Wildlife Trust, thus it is a local nature reserve. Hence the tagging leisure=nature_reserveRegards |
| 55532641 by FTOPETE | 1 | 2018-01-18 07:25:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi the board says recreation ground, it can be a park as well though. |
| 55532568 by FTOPETE | 1 | 2018-01-18 07:16:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've drawn in the skate board area and re-tagged to suit. |
| 2 | 2018-01-18 14:39:52 UTC | FTOPETE | Perfect thank you | |
| 55356830 by meatlug | 1 | 2018-01-17 17:49:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed the POI playground as you have already mapped and tagged the playground as an area. So the POI was duplicate information.Regards Bernard. |
| 55356680 by meatlug | 1 | 2018-01-17 17:46:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi the feature is mapped as a multipolygon, a building in plan form that has a hole in it. You inadvertently removed the hole which depicted a courtyard. No problem I've reinstated it.Regards Bernard. |
| 55499978 by Stefan Iliev | 1 | 2018-01-16 20:15:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think you are mistaken with the two apartments by the roadside. Could you please remove them and/or map them properly. If you need any help please just ask. I'll remove the two apartments in due course if there's no response.Best to read up a bit before contr... |
| 55457111 by dooZza | 1 | 2018-01-16 17:52:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I moved the park from being joined to the roads and railway center lines. |
| 55470392 by NinjaRage83 | 1 | 2018-01-16 07:58:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The park is already mapped in this relation :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6521066Thus the new area outline is duplicated, though there is discrepancy between the outlines. Your new area could be removed and the existing area/areas be amended, this woul... |
| 55426084 by JustSpug | 1 | 2018-01-14 18:15:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the area can be leisure=park and at the same time the landuse tag can be landuse=village_green. In fact the name says it all!Regards Bernard |
| 55376315 by Silens | 1 | 2018-01-14 10:00:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi I reverted the changeset that extended park into sea.Regards Bernard |
| 55350697 by Boozer88 | 1 | 2018-01-14 08:42:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just wanted to let you know that I reverted (put back as it was) this changeset because it dragged many areas out of shape. I'm sure that was not your intention. Would you like to try again at modifying the garden and if I can help please just ask.Regards Berna... |
| 55334560 by Tom Antrobus | 1 | 2018-01-12 18:40:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I removed the relations you added because they just didn't make sense. I've joined the paths to the roads. also amended and retagged the areas.Regards Bernard |
| 55355149 by scarlettplusnoir | 1 | 2018-01-11 15:31:52 UTC | iandees | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55355149 |
| 2 | 2018-01-11 18:03:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I also had a quick look at your additions and would just point out that if the buildings were squared up they would look even better, (neat & tidy). It's easily done in the iD editor just select/highlight the outline, right mouse click, select and click... | |
| 55325572 by meatlug | 1 | 2018-01-11 15:02:59 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, you've added the bench to the long highway Green Lane, either a very long bench or a small mistake. Would you care to remove the bench tag from the path and have another go.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2018-01-11 15:19:43 UTC | meatlug | thanks for the tip! I'm getting the hang of this now | |
| 55314310 by felixz | 1 | 2018-01-11 07:27:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there, that's a great deal better, well done. The buildings will now be rendered properly. However there's possibly a small problem with the mapping. If the houses are a terrace of houses then they should be joined together rather than depicted as separate dwellings. You could have a look at t... |
| 55295736 by victor_bob | 1 | 2018-01-09 18:57:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, (service_times = First and Third Sunday 8:00am) this isn't recognized in OSM, I've changed it to a note= or you could place the info in description= tag.Regards Bernard |
| 55299224 by felixz | 1 | 2018-01-09 18:29:44 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, just tagging features as area=yes does not convey enough info to the database for a feature to be rendered. A feature needs to be described in the tagging, like building=house. If you can't determine what the feature is then please leave it till you gain more experience. There are plenty of guid... |
| 55298524 by felixz | 1 | 2018-01-09 18:01:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Tagging a building with only area=yes is rather meaningless. If you don't the use of the building then building=yes. For a house tag building=house and so on.Regards Bernard |
| 55264223 by Bellerephons | 1 | 2018-01-08 17:56:59 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The correct tag for a park is leisure=park, that would be the reason for the area not rendering properly. Both recreation ground and park are now tagged, please remove any that arn't applicable.Regards Bernard. |
| 55154519 by heathcliffe | 1 | 2018-01-04 12:51:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.With regard to canal way 59416736, v3. You've inadvertently joined the canal to the footpath (Way: 550852431), twice passed the waterway under two sections of Grovesner Road without showing how that is accomplished and crossed the cycleway (Way: 59416732) without... |
| 2 | 2018-01-08 08:14:10 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so I've added bridges and extended the canal to the river. Regards | |
| 55141694 by Steve3742 | 1 | 2018-01-04 08:54:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Steve3742 and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to let you know that there are a few problems with your newly mapped path. If you zoom right in you can see that there are two sections of path, which overlap but do not join to each other. Also neither section actually joins to the road, ... |
| 2 | 2018-01-08 08:05:19 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so I've adjusted the ways. Regards | |
| 55015426 by inventor02 | 1 | 2017-12-30 08:51:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to point out a couple of things you're obviously not aware of regarding OSM. Please see here :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes regarding highway lane tagging. Although Monkham's Avenue is a single carriageway there are actually two ... |
| 2 | 2018-01-07 08:54:51 UTC | BCNorwich | No response from mapper so I've made Monkham's Avenue lanes=2, and removed the address tags. | |
| 55160286 by cdewhurst | 1 | 2018-01-04 17:50:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for your addition to OSM, unfortunately in it's present situation it doesn't work as you'd think it should. A gate should be a barrier across a highway limiting progress along the way. As you've mapped it, it is a linear feature along a part of the linear ... |
| 2 | 2018-01-05 10:00:45 UTC | cdewhurst | Hi Bernard,Thanks for your help on this, yes please change it for me to the correct gate if you don't mind.Many thanksCaley | |
| 3 | 2018-01-05 13:38:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Done, gate tags added to node and emergency=yes added.Regards Bernard | |
| 54310725 by Jamie Kirk | 1 | 2018-01-05 08:59:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, it would be good to know what the fire point actually is? Folk would then understand it and it might be rendered. Is it a hydrant, a fire place/BBQ point, extinguisher or maybe even an assembly point in case of a fire?Regards Bernard |
| 55158770 by meatlug | 1 | 2018-01-04 14:44:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just joined ways together where your new path crossed over a cycle-way, some highways are a bit difficult to see.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2018-01-04 15:20:17 UTC | meatlug | thank you for the welcome - would you expect this path to now render in the standard map view? | |
| 3 | 2018-01-04 17:32:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, yes it will render given a little time. I noticed that the school outline was duplicated and deleted one of those ways. That might slow down the re-render a bit. I can see a partial render so it should be OK.Regards Bernard | |
| 4 | 2018-01-04 17:34:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Reload your browser tab and the path should be there, bye. | |
| 55090307 by johnwmpls | 1 | 2018-01-02 08:05:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi just wanted to let you know that the two streams you added are mapped to be flowing away from the main river. I may be wrong but this doesn't seem natural.Also the stream is connected to the river bank and not to the main river. Thus the stream is not connected to the waterway network.A remed... |
| 2 | 2018-01-03 02:18:12 UTC | johnwmpls | Hmmm... I'm out confident which way they are flowing. Either way, I'll fix the connection issue | |
| 55068573 by Marcos1cromer | 1 | 2018-01-01 08:15:59 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi the area added as landuse=residential (Way: 550188877) is within an already mapped residential area (Way: 48976223). Thus the new area is a duplication. It's usual to map larger areas as residential, not each back garden.I've re-tagged the address for 6 Avenue Road to conform to OSM practice. I... |
| 2 | 2018-01-01 13:43:58 UTC | Marcos1cromer | Hi Bernard.The 6 Avenue Road property is indeed a series of apartments accessible through the one door rather than two houses.Additionally, the tree is a point of interest within the road and is used as a landmark and feature for the local community. Would it not be better to re introduce th... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-01 14:37:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi Marcos, Thanks for replying, I've changed number 6 to apartments and replaced the POI stating it as natural=tree. Regards Bernard | |
| 55068487 by Marcos1cromer | 1 | 2018-01-01 07:45:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.From looking at the several aerial image layers available it looks like the way ought not to have been deleted. IMHO there is a way here and on the opposite side of Avenue Road and they could be described as highway=service, service=driveway and maybe access=priv... |
| 54597264 by lmckee1967 | 1 | 2017-12-14 13:47:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I said before that you are duplicating house outlines. Way: 546598415 is now triplicated.Way: 546598412 is duplicated with one node joined to the next building.Way: 546598410 is duplicated.I don't know how you are doing this but I've already corrected a great many of your duplication... |
| 2 | 2017-12-29 08:04:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Fixed! | |
| 54597296 by lmckee1967 | 1 | 2017-12-14 13:48:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Both buildings are duplicated! |
| 2 | 2017-12-29 08:03:44 UTC | BCNorwich | Fixed! | |
| 54597973 by lmckee1967 | 1 | 2017-12-14 13:55:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Recreation Ground is duplicated. |
| 2 | 2017-12-29 07:54:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Houses are duplicated! | |
| 3 | 2017-12-29 07:59:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, After no response I've remove the duplicated areas keeping the first mapped items.Regards Bernard | |
| 54597357 by lmckee1967 | 1 | 2017-12-14 13:53:27 UTC | BCNorwich | All buildings in the changeset are duplicated as well as many more along this road! |
| 2 | 2017-12-29 07:52:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, after no response I've removed the duplicated buildings, keeping the first mapped items.Regards Bernard | |
| 54986047 by Andy Stevenson | 1 | 2017-12-28 17:17:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I wondered if you meant the gate to be a barrier to the end of the road. If so then it needs to be joined to the road.As it is (un-joined) it is not a barrier to the road.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-12-28 17:24:51 UTC | Andy Stevenson | Now amended - I think. Thanks for checking | |
| 3 | 2017-12-28 19:17:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Glad to help, all OK now.Regards | |
| 54405729 by ForestSoftware | 1 | 2017-12-27 18:33:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You've inadvertently placed the Barnado's shop in the middle of Bridge Street. Do you think you could better position it please.Regards Bernard |
| 54879925 by SavageBrewski | 1 | 2017-12-27 12:54:14 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I refer to Edington Village Park which does not look like a regular park for public use. I can't find any reference to this park at all. Could you please show how it is verifiable? Thanks Bernard. |
| 54513168 by Emma Crombie | 1 | 2017-12-25 19:59:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've changed the tags from park to pitch, the park is the whole area as drawn and tagged |
| 54706361 by DanielTM1 | 1 | 2017-12-17 16:31:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This may well be the Croatian Ambassador's residence but is it really the Croatian Embassy? The website http://uk.mvep.hr/en/ says the embassy is at 21 Conway Street.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2017-12-25 19:49:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I have removed the embassy tag from a residence, the UK Croatian embassy is at 21 Conway St, Fitzrovia, London W1T 6BN | |
| 54597801 by jamielang17 | 1 | 2017-12-23 13:47:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've tidied up the buildings and gardens also correctly tagged them. |
| 54843184 by 2020 Consultancy | 1 | 2017-12-22 20:38:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.You accidentally moved several highways out of shape so please be careful when you have a look at the map editor. It's so easy to upload incorrect data.Luckily I noticed and re-positioned the highways so there's no damage done.Thanks and Regards Bernard |
| 54815522 by trigpoint | 1 | 2017-12-21 17:45:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Trigpoint, I think you may have removed this clinic in error. This was/is a separate private clinic :- http://www.uniclinic.co.uk/en/ address 635B Cranbrook RoadThe Scan Clinic http://thescanclinic.co.uk/about is at address 635A Cranbrook Road. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-12-22 16:09:59 UTC | trigpoint | Oh, it looked like a duplicate, plus the mistagging as a hospital and spam description.It all seems too small as it is just a house. | |
| 54414829 by C-Bl | 1 | 2017-12-19 19:16:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, that was a bus stop you moved not the village sign. The bus stop is named/called Village Sign, a bit confusing. I've moved the bus stop back as it was.Regards Bernard |
| 54736295 by C-Bl | 1 | 2017-12-19 18:37:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello the tags name=Dersingham and place=village are already on the node for the place Dersingham. They are therefore a duplication of data and not needed on the residential area outline. Regards Bernard |
| 54670492 by Harman Thind | 1 | 2017-12-16 07:26:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, I notice that there is no indication of how the railway crosses the primary highway north and south of Sultanpur Lodhi station. I thought you being local you might know.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2017-12-16 08:43:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, I notice that there is no indication of how the railway crosses the primary highway north and south of Sultanpur Lodhi station. I thought you being local you might know.Regards Bernard. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-19 13:50:34 UTC | Harman Thind | Actually there is a cross between road and railway line near the station and when train comes the road closes for a short period.This all system is being followed in India. | |
| 4 | 2017-12-19 17:09:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, yes this is what I thought it was. In this case then it is appropriate to tag as railway=level_crossing as described here :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dlevel_crossingRegards Bernard | |
| 54579421 by Mullen90 | 1 | 2017-12-13 07:20:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM is a live worldwide database from which folk produce thousands of maps. It's therefore important that the data is correct and verifiable, so any fictions must be avoided. You can make your own map with any fiction you wish without contaminating OSM.I questi... |
| 2 | 2017-12-19 14:16:54 UTC | BCNorwich | No response but it was actually remove by another mapper anyway. | |
| 54741546 by Salih Özüşen | 1 | 2017-12-18 20:39:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Could you please verify that this bank is actually in that house. If not then could you please remove it or correct the position. If I can help please just ask, I'll wait a short while for your response.Regards Bernard |
| 54728259 by Adaobi Okoye | 1 | 2017-12-18 14:51:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.A couple of things I must point out, firstly your POI is a long way from it's address 71/75 Shelton Street.The mention of Google as a source prompts to make sure you are aware of copyright infringement rules as mentioned at the bottom of this page :- https://ww... |
| 54496862 by phi trần | 1 | 2017-12-10 08:55:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Adding you home to OSM is OK as long as it's done correctly.But adding name=home, tourism=guest_house to a residential building is incorrect. If you added postal/address details to the building folk could then look up your address and be routed to it. Along wit... |
| 2 | 2017-12-17 09:15:23 UTC | BCNorwich | There's been no response so I've removed the item. It can be correctly added if you come back later. | |
| 53039945 by jamielang17 | 1 | 2017-12-16 14:00:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed the fiction name and tagged the building as abandoned as per your indication. |
| 53040187 by jamielang17 | 1 | 2017-12-16 13:59:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi the footpaths are not joined to the rest of the highway network. |
| 54403331 by jamielang17 | 1 | 2017-12-16 13:41:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Duplicated hotel removed. |
| 2 | 2017-12-16 13:45:03 UTC | BCNorwich | node 42428291, v6 placed back in it's original position. It was dragged with the road out of position. | |
| 54622624 by test159159 | 1 | 2017-12-14 14:26:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Are you sure the three fountains exist? Are they inside the temple grounds?I moved the building back off the car park area.Regards Bernard |
| 54598361 by emmakeeley04 | 1 | 2017-12-14 14:01:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed several residential areas because they are already within an existing mapped residential area.Regards Bernard |
| 54403341 by lmckee1967 | 1 | 2017-12-07 09:37:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, the houses you are adding on Valley View are already mapped so the are now duplication. I have removed some of the duplication's.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-12-14 13:32:41 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so I've removed all (I think) of the duplicate buildings. | |
| 54593380 by Ret88 | 1 | 2017-12-13 12:11:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Separated area from center line of highway. |
| 54593197 by Ret88 | 1 | 2017-12-13 12:04:15 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I removed the recreation ground tag from the hotel ground area. Also the hotel tag from the building as all info is contained on the external area's tags. Then changed building use to commercial.Replaced node on park area, looks like accidentally dragged out of pl... |
| 54481761 by papaj | 1 | 2017-12-09 13:12:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I see you have a layer=1 tag on the islet.The two bridges are set as layer=1 to show they are above the river that they cross. It also means that the islet is on the same layer as the bridges that come down onto it. With no layer tag on the islet the default for the islet would be taken as 0 s... |
| 2 | 2017-12-09 16:11:17 UTC | papaj | Thanks i had added trying to get the Islet to display correctly and forgot to remove it. | |
| 54472946 by Jakeinblue | 1 | 2017-12-09 07:05:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended the postcode. Also removed the name for which I can find no verification, it looks like a name used to play a game.Data contributed to OSM should be verifiable to all thus if you can show variability of the name it can be included and I'll gladly r... |
| 54465786 by ospreydave | 1 | 2017-12-08 18:48:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This playground looks like a basketball area even though your changeset comment is add football pitch and your tag is for playground.By the way I've added a man_made=beacon to the millennium beacon so it shows as a POI.Regards Bernard. |
| 54403873 by AmySwan | 1 | 2017-12-07 09:51:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I think you've forgotten to finish mapping Way: 545027911 https://osm.org/go/es~Vj72Oo--?way=545027911Regards Bernard. |
| 54403058 by hannahhty | 1 | 2017-12-07 09:43:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, a lot of the houses you are adding are duplication's, mapper leahhoran is also mapping them, could you please remove the duplicated features. It really messes the map up!Regards Bernard |
| 54403607 by leahhoran | 1 | 2017-12-07 09:41:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, a lot of the houses you are adding are duplication's, could you please remove them. It really messes the map up!Regards Bernard |
| 54387460 by HotMuk | 1 | 2017-12-07 08:16:35 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You proved a while back that you can give some serious contribution to OSM for which I'm sure the community is very grateful.I've removed your recent and previous fiction from the database so no harm done. If you really have drawn your name across the grass and... |
| 54303475 by GamerRaver | 1 | 2017-12-04 07:36:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You might not be aware that OSM is a live worldwide database (not a map) from which folk compile hundreds of maps. With the above in mind I hope you can see that adding fiction and/or amending existing data to fiction seriously harms the database.You have map... |
| 2 | 2017-12-06 09:02:22 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so changeset reverted. | |
| 54286413 by mattdowse | 1 | 2017-12-03 08:11:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just looked at your addition of a ditch to the database. You've drawn it as a linear feature but zig-zaging back across itself. Are you sure? Perhaps you could have a close look and maybe make a correction, thanks.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-12-06 08:48:56 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so I've removed the zig zag. If I can help you map something properly please just ask. | |
| 54322779 by openstreetmapforPokemon | 1 | 2017-12-04 09:33:48 UTC | EdLoach | Do Chislet Park and Bredlands Park exist? On aerial imagery they look more like school grounds. Perhaps you can point me at a website that mentions them? You've also damaged the shape of the Spires Academy area http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161484452 which is what made me ask about the parks in t... |
| 2 | 2017-12-06 08:16:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately your additions look to be obvious fiction, especially considering the changeset comment. On top of this the manner of the additions has caused damage to existing features. With respect I would advise reverting this changeset, your response is awaited.Rega... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-06 16:42:45 UTC | EdLoach | I have reverted this changeset and 54329859 as Bing really doesn't look like the added parks are parks. This will also undo the damage to Spires Academy. As BCNorwich says, welcome to OpenStreetMap and if you want any help making valid edits let us know or ask questions at help.openstreetmap.org or ... | |
| 54364404 by Bogdan Shuricane | 1 | 2017-12-05 16:07:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You've placed the wilderness hut on the side of a public highway which I suspect is a very unlikely place being so far from any wilderness. Features added to OSM must be verifiable. I'll remove it for now but if you can show/verify it's existence it can easily be... |
| 54364378 by Benjamin BARON | 1 | 2017-12-05 14:19:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've added all data onto one building outline then removed the POI and the duplicated building.Regards Bernard |
| 54350937 by Zee111 | 1 | 2017-12-05 14:13:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Sorry to say after your good efforts that the recreation ground is already mapped. Your point in the middle of the field actually duplicated your addition to the map. I've now removed the duplication's. I also removed two POI park as the data is tagged on the are... |
| 54355085 by john garner-hay | 1 | 2017-12-05 08:50:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It doesn't look quite right having a building with address number 46 indicating the whole building when there is an address node inside that building as number 42.I would think it is a block of three houses or flats, numbered 42,44,46. If this is correct then i... |
| 54314472 by HexBlack | 1 | 2017-12-04 17:32:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi the negative tag intermittent=no is not needed in the database as this is the default except in special circumstances. If we tag all waterways and hundreds of other features with all the negative tags we would seriously bloat the database to no avail.This topic I recall was recently discussed i... |
| 2 | 2017-12-04 17:40:35 UTC | HexBlack | Sorry I am new to OSM and had not noticed I added that addition not meaning to bloat the database sorry again. | |
| 54131803 by enrico885 | 1 | 2017-11-28 08:37:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.There is a "Bill's" cafe already mapped not far south from here. In converting this POI into a duplicate of Bill's cafe you have removed/overwritten the POI for "The Covent Garden Academy of Flowers". Do you mind having a look and making corre... |
| 2 | 2017-12-04 17:10:06 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so changeset reverted. | |
| 54131488 by CityofLalaland | 1 | 2017-11-28 08:12:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, is the path really formally named "Path"? Features added to the database should be verifiable to everyone. |
| 2 | 2017-12-04 16:59:41 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so name removed. | |
| 54307943 by Londonred79 | 1 | 2017-12-04 09:03:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.That area is designated as a public garden, please see website tagged to the area.I've also removed the area from joining onto the center of adjacent roads.Regards Bernard. |
| 54280256 by kenchy | 1 | 2017-12-03 07:12:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've retagged the water area you added to leisure=swimming_pool thus I think giving a better description.The swimming tags are under leisure features not as you might expect under water features. OSM tags are often a bit confusing, so perhaps looking at how sim... |
| 54263201 by stickyjam | 1 | 2017-12-02 10:09:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the park area added is within an already mapped recreation ground. |
| 54262978 by stickyjam | 1 | 2017-12-02 09:17:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, The area is a school recreation ground, it's mapped within the school amenity area so I've reverted the change.Regards Bernard |
| 54238808 by TheCallumRead | 1 | 2017-12-01 16:27:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Very good first effort at mapping, you've just got quite a bit of tag learning to do.I've tweaked the building and moved the highways out from under it. (Highways were placed a bit awry by someone else.)I've also tagged the former use and name as disused so f... |
| 2 | 2017-12-01 16:30:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Oh, I also redid the bus stop that you somehow got joined to the building and tagged as the pub. | |
| 54211214 by Dragonmaster306 | 1 | 2017-12-01 12:32:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you somehow inadvertently moved a bench from beside Whitlingham Broad to be joined onto the railway at Crown Point.I've reverted that node, bench back as it was.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-12-01 17:28:46 UTC | Dragonmaster306 | Sorry! Thany you :) | |
| 54221264 by Phijkchu TS | 1 | 2017-12-01 08:05:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The recreation ground can be a park as well, I've amended the tags to better show this.I also added the Memorial Gates and tweaked the area separating it from highways.Regards Bernard |
| 54213164 by tchag002x | 1 | 2017-12-01 07:32:12 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I Just removed the t from Sat so that the opening hours format goes with best practice. Added the address as well.Regards Bernard |
| 54205691 by cptseriotis | 1 | 2017-11-30 15:33:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome OpenStreetMap.The feature that you added the POI for amenity=school is already mapped. I've added your extra data to the are outline which is usual practice for this type of facility.Thanks and Regards Bernard |
| 54131463 by Displaynameunavaliable | 1 | 2017-11-28 17:15:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your addition looked OK, why delete it?Regards Bernard |
| 54132111 by shuang07 | 1 | 2017-11-28 14:33:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think you meant amenity=bicycle_rental instead of amenity=university so I've altered it for you.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-11-28 14:36:12 UTC | BCNorwich | If American Starbucks Cafe is the name for the cafe then it would be good to tag the POI as such. Need any help just ask.Regards Bernard. | |
| 54131642 by Kentuckyrr29 | 1 | 2017-11-28 08:24:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Was the reason for adding one node to mark where you live? If so unfortunately a single untagged node won't will not show. It would be much better to draw in a building and add the address. If I can help in any way please just ask.Regards Bernard |
| 54131363 by CityofLalaland | 1 | 2017-11-28 07:48:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for adding a building to the live worldwide OSM database. A database which folk on lots of different projects including map making. Thus we all want the data to be consistent , correct and verifiable.I made a few amendments to your building in order to k... |
| 53832524 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-11-17 11:51:18 UTC | rorym | Hi. I noticed you added some addr:place=Swords here (and in other changesets). Are you sure that's right? I don't really know much about addr:place, but the docs on the wiki ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:place ) say it shouldn't be for places which also have an addr:street, which so... |
| 2 | 2017-11-27 08:55:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, you are quite right about the wiki and I was unaware of the advice not to use addr:street and addr:place together. I don't think it has any detrimental effect except to add unnecessary data.I think I've now removed all tags addr:place=Swords that I added. If you see any I missed could you p... | |
| 54045953 by Caroline Burge | 1 | 2017-11-26 12:21:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMapI just looked at your recent additions to OSM because a section of highway was noted as duplication. I've removed the duplication's and added a service road so all is now OK. When you add or alter ways it's always best to amend what is already mapped thus a comple... |
| 53963463 by Danny Ho | 1 | 2017-11-21 08:55:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Could you explain what you meant to do when adding a huge park are across central London including the Thames River, (folk will get wet socks walking there)?It does not look right as such ought be removed. If I can help you achieve a genuine addition to the map... |
| 2 | 2017-11-25 10:11:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, after no response I have reverted the changeset as it seems to be a fiction.Regards Bernard | |
| 3 | 2017-11-25 18:35:12 UTC | Danny Ho | Hi, just a test and its fine.thanks: | |
| 4 | 2017-11-25 18:50:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, yes all OK now park is removed.It was might have only been a test but the changes were uploaded to the live worldwide database from which hundreds of maps are derived and updated. So not quite the place to make tests.As I said though all is well. If there's anything I can help you with pleas... | |
| 5 | 2017-11-25 18:58:02 UTC | Danny Ho | Ohhi am so sorry!understood and will not happen again, thank you very much for the answer and for now I have no questions.thank you very much | |
| 54002855 by A Hawke | 1 | 2017-11-24 08:29:24 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately you've somehow inadvertently dragged a section the coastline out of shape. In order to put the coast back exactly as it was I reverted this changeset. I can't see what it was you were trying to correct so perhaps you could look again.Regards Berna... |
| 2 | 2017-11-24 20:33:09 UTC | A Hawke | Don't understand BC Norwich comment. Name change I made is still there. Did not touch coastline | |
| 3 | 2017-11-25 07:51:04 UTC | BCNorwich | My apologies, the coastline incident was only indirectly connected to this changeset but was not your doing. That's been now sorted out. Sorry!I did want and meant to comment on your new path addition though. Just to point out that it has not been connected/joined to the roads at either end but ... | |
| 54009620 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-11-22 22:58:42 UTC | SomeoneElse | I don't think that the chemists in Clipstone was ever a hospital was it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541972384/history |
| 2 | 2017-11-23 07:33:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi SomeoneElse, the present tags were not from myself, a search shows the facility mapped to have actually been Clipstone Health Centre. If it's confirmed to not be now closed it ought to be tagged disused.Regards Bernard | |
| 3 | 2017-11-24 15:08:36 UTC | SomeoneElse | Well (the chemists) was shut when I was there. It looks like a new mapper added the "hospital". They've only been mapping for a couple of days so I'll let them get their feet under the table before pinging them with questions :) | |
| 53995859 by TJ1990 | 1 | 2017-11-22 14:55:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to let you know that Priory Country Park is mapped, I had sorted a lot of problems here earlier this year. It is this way Way: Priory Country Park (23604214) as can be seen here :- https://osm.org/go/eu6OElHc--?layers=N&way=23604214So what you... |
| 2 | 2017-11-22 15:29:37 UTC | TJ1990 | Thanks yes noticed half way through doing this hopefully I was able to remove what I created. | |
| 53994722 by NorthantsPete | 1 | 2017-11-22 14:19:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I would think that by adding a fictitious lane you've made the situation even worse.The number one rule is never map for the rendering of a map, and if mapped properly then a router fails it is a problem with the router not the mapping.Unless I'm mistaken it is clear from Bing images that th... |
| 53980738 by SavageBrewski | 1 | 2017-11-22 09:44:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, Way: Biddenham Farm (468715348) is not leisure=park as you've tagged it. Also the crop= tag is to indicate the type of crop wheat or potatoes for instance. The area may be part of Biddenham Farm but as you have indicated on other areas it is not it is not wholly the farm, It's better to indic... |
| 53980635 by SavageBrewski | 1 | 2017-11-22 09:37:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, Way: 542098857 doesn't look right. I doubt if there are any formal paths in this area as it is highway land and not a park. Anyway the paths you've drawn criss cross over each other without joining.Regards Bernard |
| 53974365 by NorthantsPete | 1 | 2017-11-21 16:43:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I wonder if you could say where your information on the foot, cycle and horse restrictions came from please? Also where does the name come from? It is my understanding that a pedestrian is free to walk along the side of any carriageway other than a motorway or a ... |
| 2 | 2017-11-21 16:51:57 UTC | BCNorwich | You've also changed the main carriageway of the A45 trunk road from highway=trunk to highway=primary_link. This is obviously the main A45 carraigway so the alteration should be reverted.Regards Bernard | |
| 3 | 2017-11-21 16:54:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Lastly I think the sign you refer to in this changeset comment might be a temporary sign that is opened to sight occasionally for some reason I can't figure out.Regards Bernard | |
| 53950428 by Ashe Medforth | 1 | 2017-11-20 15:10:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The building was already mapped and tagged as Northwood Hall so I've placed your new postcode there as well. Then removed the POI as it just duplicates data. Regards Bernard |
| 53929277 by Mitzybish | 1 | 2017-11-19 20:17:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I don't think Sorby Close site really counts as a campsite unless the are has changed from residential housing. If the area has changed I apologise, if not could the POI please be removed.As for the other POI (Skegness Sands) that area is already mapped/tagged ... |
| 53875792 by Gary Red Rock | 1 | 2017-11-17 18:22:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.There is alreaddy a cafe mapped near here, it's the building just the other side of the security building.Regards Bernard |
| 53818669 by Lozzy_uk | 1 | 2017-11-16 08:42:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your StreetComplete app has not actually put the speed limits into OSM. It has added the tag "maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single" which is the type of speed limit but not the actual speed restriction. The tag "maxspeed=30mph" needs to be added to sho... |
| 53612732 by hannahhty | 1 | 2017-11-11 08:51:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to let you know that a lot of the houses you added to OSM are duplication's.Do you think you could have a look and correct the problem please? Or would you prefer if I or some other mapper fixed this for you?Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-11-16 07:38:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, no response so I've fixed the problems and removed the duplicated farmland. Regards | |
| 53803663 by Caroline Nash | 1 | 2017-11-15 17:41:44 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The default value for oneway is taken as =no except in special circumstances. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway |
| 2 | 2017-11-15 17:45:30 UTC | BCNorwich | There's a lot to take on board when starting out mapping to OSM and you can't learn it all at once. (Like don't hit the comment button to quickly). Please keep on with contributions to our great map.Regards Bernard | |
| 3 | 2017-11-15 17:55:08 UTC | Caroline Nash | Hi Bernard,Fern Grove is a conventional two-way street and the one-way option was labelled as "No assumed" and I changed it to "No" i.e. I confirmed that the it was not one-way and the assumption was correct.Rgds Caroline | |
| 4 | 2017-11-15 19:33:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, that's correct with a conventional two-way street, it was/is assumed that oneway=no so no action was needed. There was no need for the way to be actually tagged oneway=no. Or looking at it a slightly different way, in the absence of a oneway= tag it is assumed automatically by the database that ... | |
| 53477662 by SJM2000 | 1 | 2017-11-07 11:10:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I looked at your recent additions to OSM and am sorry to say that The Old Barn Cafe (537946059, v2) is now mapped in triplicate.I wonder if you could investigate and remedy this problem. Or if your are being tutored perhaps your tutor could instigate a remedy... |
| 2 | 2017-11-15 17:57:15 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so I've attempted to remedy the problems. Most are deleted as being duplicate but keeping any useful tags. | |
| 53549838 by aimeesowry | 1 | 2017-11-07 11:02:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I looked at your recent additions to OSM and am sorry to say the most of them are already mapped. This has happened with a few new mappers around Malham, thus the features are duplicated and even triplicated.I wonder if you could investigate and remedy this p... |
| 2 | 2017-11-15 17:56:18 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so I've attempted to remedy the problems. Most are deleted as being duplicate but keeping any useful tags. | |
| 53476700 by Joe Shaw 34 | 1 | 2017-11-07 10:56:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I looked at your recent additions to OSM and am sorry to say the most of them are already mapped. This has happened with a few new mappers around Malham, thus the features are duplicated and even triplicated.I wonder if you could investigate and remedy this p... |
| 2 | 2017-11-15 17:55:30 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so I've attempted to remedy the problems. Most are deleted as being duplicate but keeping any useful tags. | |
| 53785442 by Spiizy | 1 | 2017-11-15 07:25:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your addition to the OSM database is very good. I noticed the Esri aerial imagery is more recent than Bing so I tweaked the position slightly. Also added a few service roads on the estate from Esri.It would be great if you could add speed limits, I know that's ... |
| 53476160 by KieranG09 | 1 | 2017-11-07 10:54:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I looked at your recent additions to OSM and am sorry to say the most of them are already mapped. This has happened with a few new mappers around Malham, thus the features are duplicated and even triplicated.I wonder if you could investigate and remedy this p... |
| 2 | 2017-11-14 13:01:13 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so I've attempted to remedy the problems. Most are deleted as being duplicate but keeping any useful tags. | |
| 53464420 by KieranG09 | 1 | 2017-11-07 10:53:15 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I looked at your recent additions to OSM and am sorry to say the most of them are already mapped. This has happened with a few new mappers around Malham, thus the features are duplicated and even triplicated.I wonder if you could investigate and remedy this p... |
| 2 | 2017-11-14 11:35:32 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so I've attempted to remedy the problems. Most are deleted as being duplicate but keeping any useful tags. | |
| 53760082 by granitecolchester | 1 | 2017-11-14 07:43:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, no disrespect meant but as it is on the side of the road folk have to investigate further to find out exactly how to get to the company. If you place the POI within the outline of the building that houses it folk will know exactly where to go, this is the usual practice for OSM. Regards Bernar... |
| 53750744 by Captain Graviton | 1 | 2017-11-14 07:24:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Review Request I made a few minor adjustments to your address to conform with OSM and mailing standards. Added extra address fields including removing "Studio" from addr:housenumber= them adding addr:unit=Studio, (Studio is not part of the house number... |
| 2 | 2017-11-14 14:24:46 UTC | Captain Graviton | Thanks for your help with this Bernard! Cheers! | |
| 53738619 by granitecolchester | 1 | 2017-11-13 17:03:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Sorry to say that I think you have your premises POI in the wrong place, that is judging from your website.If you need help re positioning it please just ask.Regards Bernard |
| 53612875 by leahhoran | 1 | 2017-11-11 08:55:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to let you know that a lot of the houses you added to OSM are duplication's.Do you think you could have a look and correct the problem please? Or would you prefer if I or some other mapper fixed this for you?Regards Bernard |
| 53612893 by CaraLloyd | 1 | 2017-11-11 08:53:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to let you know that a lot of the houses you added to OSM are duplication's.Do you think you could have a look and correct the problem please? Or would you prefer if I or some other mapper fixed this for you?Regards Bernard |
| 53638084 by SeanMcA | 1 | 2017-11-11 08:43:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, just wanted to let you know you've got some self intersection on Way: Barrack Bog (539425200). Please see here:- https://tinyurl.com/y93y8r4jRegards Bernard |
| 53479189 by Tharun T | 1 | 2017-11-03 17:12:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, You've actually moved a Post Box from its position on the High Street and placed it in a building. This building may well be the Post Office in the Willowdale Centre.Would you like me to revert the change thus putting the Post Box back to its original position?Please don't be put off by... |
| 2 | 2017-11-10 08:59:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I didn't hear from you so I've reverted the change. | |
| 53479163 by Tharun T | 1 | 2017-11-03 16:54:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.At the position you've moved the Coop POI to the existing building is already tagged as the Coop. Your moved POI is therefore duplicate information thus ought to be removed. Shall I remove it for you?Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-11-10 08:55:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I did not hear from you so I've removed the node. | |
| 53636468 by Gleavo | 1 | 2017-11-09 14:01:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for adding the two recreation areas, I've just tweaked them a bit and added a few more details.Regards Bernard |
| 53608433 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-11-09 11:50:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | You've said here "Fix self intersection of area outline.". Could you explain what the problem actually was? |
| 2 | 2017-11-09 12:10:51 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi The changeset shows that one node (5215244108, v2) was removed from way (256223532, v4). If you temporarily revert the changeset you can easily see what changes have been made. The removed node was at the north east of the landuse=farmland area where it borders the wood, here :- https://osm.org/g... | |
| 53591642 by ei8fdb | 1 | 2017-11-08 07:28:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you need to add maxspeed=?? Your tag does not state the speed limit just the type of limit.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-11-08 07:29:19 UTC | BCNorwich | I meant to mention that StreetComplete may not be clear on speed limit adding. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-08 09:00:22 UTC | ei8fdb | Hi BN,Hmm, I don't remember adding the speed limit as "??". From memory the steps I made were:Click on speed limit iconUsed "other answer" optionChose "no speed limit" or no speed limit signAnswered yes to "are you sure"Answered no to a questio... | |
| 4 | 2017-11-08 11:42:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I thought from your changeset comment of "Add speed limits" that you were trying to add a speed limit. It seems then that StreetComplete adds a default tag of "maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single" when "no speed limit" is chosen. Anyway there's no harm done. Regards... | |
| 5 | 2017-11-08 12:45:33 UTC | ei8fdb | Hi,Yes I was trying to add a speed limit, using the StreetComplete icon of a speed limit sign with an acceleration dial.I chose "other answer" with there is no sign. Looking at it now again, I see an option to click a tick box with ?? as limit. I'm sure I didn't choose that opt... | |
| 6 | 2017-11-08 12:46:02 UTC | ei8fdb | If it helps I can do the same thing again to try and replicate? | |
| 7 | 2017-11-08 17:29:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've just now removed your "maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single" from two sections of Globe Road. So yes please try again to add the proper speed limit. If it fails I can add the limit for you, is the limit 20mph here?Regards | |
| 53591371 by ei8fdb | 1 | 2017-11-08 07:05:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I must point out to you that data on GoogleMaps is copyright material. It is therefore not allowed for it to be copied to OSM.I have removed that name which I am sure was added inadvertently.Please see this page (near the bottom, OSM statement on copyright) :... |
| 2 | 2017-11-08 09:48:26 UTC | ei8fdb | Hi Bernard,Ah, sorry. Wasn't aware (though I suppose I should have been). I can re-add the description later. I eyeballed the street but there was no street sign. Thanks,Bernard | |
| 53488683 by 123mapper | 1 | 2017-11-04 07:49:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I looked at the Bing imagery for the location Silver Court and it looks like there is a building where you've drawn the way. Does the way go through the building or is the way misplaced? I can see cars parked at the west so perhaps the way is through a tunnel o... |
| 2 | 2017-11-04 09:50:13 UTC | 123mapper | Thanks! I've had a go at putting the archway in as a tunnel as you suggest. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-04 10:20:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Really good job, well done! Regards Bernard | |
| 12967187 by OffTheChart | 1 | 2017-11-02 16:42:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, just wanted to let you know you've drawn way 179278573, v1 around the Parish Hall but not tagged it. |
| 51710077 by OffTheChart | 1 | 2017-11-02 16:32:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, regarding way (private) (521164524, v1). This was tagged with name=(private) IMHO incorrect so I've made it a note. If actually the track is private please tag it access=private, the name tag isn't for descriptions of the way. |
| 53224090 by 晓野先生 | 1 | 2017-10-25 06:08:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I'm pretty sure this property is not named "Farmhouse", it's also a poorly drawn outline, I wonder if you meant to outline the whole property or just the house.If I can help in any way please just ask.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2017-10-31 19:45:32 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so this building redrawn and name removed. Also several other near buildings added. | |
| 53224071 by 晓野先生 | 1 | 2017-10-25 06:13:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Regarding this addition of a field outline, I doubt if the proper name for the piece of land is "Farmland". The area is also poorly drawn, I can see that you have drawn around the tree shadows to the south.If I can help in any way please just ask... |
| 2 | 2017-10-31 19:44:01 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so field redrawn and name removed! | |
| 25137164 by hadw | 1 | 2017-10-31 07:38:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Building is now mapped and tagged so fixme POI/node removed |
| 53384941 by Peter Chikasha | 1 | 2017-10-31 07:05:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap, your node POI is placed in the middle of the street where I doubt the company is actually located.I note this is registered as your office in the UK, do you maintain a physical office here? If so then the tag office=yes or office=it can be added.If not then the... |
| 52907374 by Dkeith | 1 | 2017-10-23 07:26:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I noticed that this road section you added to the database :- "Way: Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route (532376490)" is a duplication of the existing way. |
| 2 | 2017-10-23 12:51:11 UTC | Dkeith | apologies. still learning.Thinks the road is on a slight different path.road is still covered in cones.If you could fix i would be obliged | |
| 3 | 2017-10-23 16:56:32 UTC | BCNorwich | No problem, the duplicate section is now removed.I'm still learning after several years mapping, OSM is continuously evolving so there's always something new. If I can help at all please just ask. Regards Bernard | |
| 4 | 2017-10-29 00:01:07 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi, I know you didn't add the name, but name=C5K doesn't look like a real name. Should this be loc_name="C5K Banchory-Devenick Road" instead?Cheers,Mike | |
| 5 | 2017-10-29 07:45:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi Mike Baggaley,You are correct, it wasn't me and yes it seems wrong.I looked up Aberdeenshire list of streets ( http://publications.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/dataset/c993f625-37ad-438a-bd28-5afe7ca6a5bc/resource/58d8fd38-2b20-45dd-9f1b-71ce210bba3a/download/south-highways-list.pdf )which indicate... | |
| 53257306 by crangon78 | 1 | 2017-10-26 11:03:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, Way: 58916901 has a self intersection on the section going towards the park gate. |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 18:53:39 UTC | BCNorwich | I've now removed the ways duplicate section. | |
| 53257061 by crangon78 | 1 | 2017-10-26 10:58:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended the park area to not join onto center of highways. Joining area to the center of highways is not seen as good practice.Regards Bernard |
| 53228698 by rjc | 1 | 2017-10-25 10:43:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I the cul-de-sac Ditton Fields is 20mph then I would think the whole estate would be 20mph especially with all the speed humps.Would you be so kind as to check and amend the map accordingly. This would no end of folk, Many Thanks.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-10-25 11:02:44 UTC | rjc | As you can see above, I've used SteetComplete Andoid app which basically asks Yes/No (or simple entry field) questions and it only asked about that part of the road - no idea why. My assumption was that it already had it for the rest of the road or simply would apply it automatically to it. If havin... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-25 15:57:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I wasn't aware of the limitations of the software. There are many apps now which all seem to provide differing ways of contributing to OSM. I noticed your addition of the 20 maxspeed so looked at and realised the other roads on the estate were tagged as 30mph, this seemed strange hence my q... | |
| 53219197 by Inga Munk Stevn | 1 | 2017-10-25 05:47:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Sorry to say that you have mapped two Bedford Hotels and both are in the wrong place. The Bedford Hotel and Southampton Row and WC1B 4HD are north of the Thames near Russell Square.The good news is the hotel is already mapped. So I'll your two incorrect POI f... |
| 53212767 by The Duck | 1 | 2017-10-24 16:38:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Hi, some of your buildings are drawn over large commercial areas (Nursery and Gritting Depot tagged as building=commercial). Also the park does not look right on the field edge behind houses. At the nursery you've dragged an existing house outline out of shape. Why mak... |
| 53206133 by MASAMASA9999 | 1 | 2017-10-24 12:55:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your new POI for Roti King is already mapped. Thus I have removed this duplication and added your new info to the existing POI. Regards Bernard |
| 53164994 by 1crazypj | 1 | 2017-10-23 06:33:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Sorry to say that your changes will not close the road.With the gate separate from the highway there is nothing to suggest that it is a part of the highway.The node (barrier=gate) needs to be joined to the highway in order for it to be rendered or seen as a r... |
| 53128144 by farcalled | 1 | 2017-10-21 18:00:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM is a live worldwide database from which folk and compamys compile maps of various kinds. It is not the place for private or unverifiable features there are other places and means to do that sort of thing.I have removed your private POI, I hope you can under... |
| 53058485 by Marius Schreiber | 1 | 2017-10-19 10:29:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted this changeset because you inadvertantly dragged a highway node from Ireland to Germany.Your POI is however not needed because Shona Art details are tagged on the building outline. I have added your opening hours and website information as that ... |
| 53002762 by zaf raja | 1 | 2017-10-17 14:10:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Sorry to say you've drawn the Aldi shop on top of the closed B&Q shop. Duplication of a building.The correct way to do this change would be to change/amend the tagging on the original shop outline. Thus keeping the history of all changes to this building in the OSM database.Regards Berna... |
| 2 | 2017-10-19 07:19:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Duplicate building removed, original building tagged with new info. | |
| 53003999 by zaf raja | 1 | 2017-10-17 14:05:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Sorry to say that you've put the video shop in the middle of the street attaching it to the highway. |
| 2 | 2017-10-19 07:16:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Shop removed. | |
| 53006124 by zaf raja | 1 | 2017-10-17 14:33:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, The Premier Inn is already mapped in it's proper place to the east of the big car park. |
| 2 | 2017-10-19 07:13:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Duplicate now removed. | |
| 53002929 by zaf raja | 1 | 2017-10-17 14:02:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello again, it looks like this changeset is also involved with the problems I mentioned in a comment on changeset 53002704Again I'd advise this changeset be reverted.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2017-10-19 07:12:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Changeset is now reverted. | |
| 53002704 by zaf raja | 1 | 2017-10-17 13:58:44 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I wonder if you realise that this changeset has deleted a lot of features and dragged other features out of shape.It would be best to revert the whole changeset in order to ensure everything is put back as it was. Then you can more carefully make your "no ... |
| 2 | 2017-10-19 07:11:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Changeset is now reverted. | |
| 53054160 by Steve Fosdick | 1 | 2017-10-19 06:23:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You can change the imagery layer in the iD editor, (click the layers icon), Esri and Digitalglobe Standard are pretty good just there.I've amended the addresses to whats usual in OSM, hope that's OK.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-10-19 06:27:00 UTC | BCNorwich | I forgot to ask do you know they are houses? Because the building tag could be bungalow if that's a better description of the dwelling type. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-19 21:57:17 UTC | Steve Fosdick | They are bungalows. I choose "house" because I thought it made it clear they are residential buildings rather than commercial or industrial. | |
| 48258464 by SomeoneElse_Revert | 1 | 2017-04-29 17:50:30 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 47946345, 47947047, 47947482, 47978416, 47980692, 48002126. |
| 2 | 2017-10-18 07:45:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, sorry to say there's a small anomaly at, Way: 184967148 a stream tagged as a bridge crossing Way: 488314032 a track tagged as a bridge. Ther's also a short section of duplicated track.As I see you're doing several reverts I thought it best to let you know this problem.Regards Bernard | |
| 3 | 2017-10-18 10:22:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Re http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184967148 , if you're familiar with the area then by all means fix it. If not, it'll clearly show up as a QA issue and someone who is familiar with the area will be able to fix it.Unfortunately I haven't been walking that side of Keswick (other than just around... | |
| 52850332 by Jaana Pietarinen | 1 | 2017-10-12 13:06:51 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Firstly it is unlikely a hotel would be situated in the middle of a street. You have not given enough information (not even a name) for anyone to determine where the hotel is situated. You've placed a poor attempt at a post code in the house-number field.Could ... |
| 2 | 2017-10-18 07:15:22 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so I've removed the ?fiction. | |
| 52669770 by EVO Recruitment | 1 | 2017-10-06 06:33:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.A few anomalies. You have managed to triplicate the outline of this building.Only the original outline is tagged building=yes, your two new outlines are not tagged to show what the feature is.There seems to be another company operating from this building wi... |
| 2 | 2017-10-18 07:06:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, no response so I've removed your two duplicates and placed your info on a node now on your postcode centroid. | |
| 52656344 by Doristriumph | 1 | 2017-10-05 17:48:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The OSM tag wheelchair:description is not meant to hold a note on a business closure but rather a description of the details of wheelchair access to a feature. Better tags for a closed or vacant shop are disused:shop=yes (to indicate a business has closed) an... |
| 2 | 2017-10-18 06:43:56 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so I've changed the tags to indicate a closed shop. | |
| 52997146 by Horia1985 | 1 | 2017-10-17 05:30:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Can you give more details of the guest house, address, website, property located in.Features added to the OSM database must be verifiable on the ground and there's not enough info to determine this features position, (in a front garden). So it ought to be corre... |
| 2 | 2017-10-17 09:32:40 UTC | trigpoint | Size of building suggests that this is a very unlikely place for a guest house.Probably yet more maps.me personal marker rubbish | |
| 3 | 2017-10-17 10:04:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi trigpoint, I agree,and a response would be unusual but I usually wait a few days so a response could be made before going back and removing fiction. Also the house numbers in the building don't look right. Regards Bernard | |
| 52977156 by Krad | 1 | 2017-10-16 12:36:15 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi I removed the school POI, info is already on the building outline. Regards |
| 2 | 2017-10-16 12:51:03 UTC | Krad | thanks still learning the difference. | |
| 52884034 by Dentaprime F3T | 1 | 2017-10-13 12:23:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.If this facility is a dental clinic, as you say plus coming to this conclusion after looking at the website, then it should be tagged as amenity=dentist not amenity=hospital.Anyone searching OSM maps for a dentist would not find your facility if it's tagged as ... |
| 2 | 2017-10-17 07:25:37 UTC | Dentaprime F3T | Thank you Bernard. We have missed that. Thanks for the edit. | |
| 52582184 by martin181163 | 1 | 2017-10-03 06:08:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just checking on new features added to OSM because I notice you add an enclosed area instead of a POI, (that enclosed area being inside an existing building). We want to keep OSM as the best map database worldwide.I further checked to verify the map position an... |
| 2 | 2017-10-12 07:50:16 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so building in building removed. | |
| 52810097 by Emma Cottingham | 1 | 2017-10-11 06:33:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I changed building=yes to office=accountant and added the website and phone number. Hope that's OK, Regards Bernard |
| 52422709 by Txuri | 1 | 2017-09-28 05:28:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I wish to inform you that you have placed the POI for the supermarket in the middle of the street. It would be better to place the POI more precisely and preferably drawing in the building. If not drawing the building then adding address details is helpful for f... |
| 2 | 2017-10-08 06:44:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi good to see you've removed the POI and added a feature. I've made minor amendments to go along with OSM best practice, (removed retail area tag from within existing retail tagged area), then added a building tag to the featusr so folk know what it is.Many Thanks & Regards Bernard | |
| 52720050 by somebody1212 | 1 | 2017-10-08 06:20:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've added 'disused:amenity=place_of_worship' and 'disused:religion=christian' tags to the library. Also a 'note=Formerly a Congregational Church built in 1842'. This is in order to show the historic use of the building and the history of OSM tagging.As you... |
| 52354931 by Essex_Boy | 1 | 2017-09-26 06:36:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello reference Way: 527505258 landuse=grassThis is a huge area and although it does contain some grass it is mainly farmland. There are also residential and commercial areas within it as well which you've not indicated.IIMHO it's better not to just map huge swathes of land in this way, it looks... |
| 2 | 2017-10-06 11:50:35 UTC | BCNorwich | It also included a very long section of highway, (obviously not grass). No response from mapper so I've removed it. | |
| 52592111 by ClarkstonCorrect | 1 | 2017-10-06 07:41:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 529654162Hi, this area is houses and their gardens, not grass. Could you please amend it to reflect what is on the ground?Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-10-06 07:56:12 UTC | ClarkstonCorrect | Yes that is the plan I'll do it tonight :)For some reason i thought grass meant somewhere where grass is present lol | |
| 52648557 by Essex_Boy | 1 | 2017-10-06 07:21:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 530247646Hi, I removed the self intersection from the outline of this feature. |
| 52653542 by Essex_Boy | 1 | 2017-10-06 07:19:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 530294700Hi, I removed the self intersection from the outline of this feature. |
| 52651379 by Essex_Boy | 1 | 2017-10-06 07:17:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 530278912Hi, I removed the self intersection from the outline of this feature. |
| 52666282 by pleaseokay | 1 | 2017-10-06 06:41:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just made the maze a circle shape, hope you'll agree it looks neater.Regards Bernard |
| 49841985 by ClarkstonCorrect | 1 | 2017-10-05 11:21:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, the name tag is meant for the proper name of a feature rather than a description of that feature. The name for the area (Greenbank Gardens) is stated/tagged on the overall feature and thus need not be stated several times. I've changed the several names on features to description=*** instead.... |
| 2 | 2017-10-05 23:01:42 UTC | ClarkstonCorrect | Ok thanks :) I'm pretty new to osm. | |
| 52629737 by ClarkstonCorrect | 1 | 2017-10-05 11:11:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, regarding Way: 530037149 and Way: 530037879 tagged landuse=grass, it looks like a large proportion of these areas are not in fact areas solely of grass. They encompass houses, drives and many domestic gardens. Further the two outlines are self-intersecting ways.Regards Bernard |
| 52643836 by daniel181937 | 1 | 2017-10-05 07:21:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed this data because the company is not at this location, so the information is at best misleading. The location is someones dwelling but the address looks wrong. Also the name field usually holds the name of the feature, D***** B***** looks like a pers... |
| 52537905 by Cleber Henrique | 1 | 2017-10-01 16:40:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Are you sure there is a well here in the river???Or have you misplaced it on the map???I wait a short while for you to respond before removing it.Regards Bernard |
| 52324942 by ericlew | 1 | 2017-10-01 12:19:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, your recently added path Capital Ring (527240440, v1) is a duplication of an existing path and the section that you duplicated are part of the existing Capital Ring (Section 1) route relation. So the way Capital Ring is mapped.I have deleted the duplication.Regards Bernard |
| 52429415 by s1jobs159 | 1 | 2017-09-29 18:28:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, you've mapped this company in the wrong place quite a distance from Renfield Street.You also removed the building tag from Gallery Apartments, I've reinstated that tag.Lastly you've got the number and street in a house-name tag.If you need help with this please just ask.Regards ... |
| 52423585 by Txuri | 1 | 2017-09-28 05:43:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've changed the open hours to OSM best practice. (I made the change because opening hours get a bit complicated and need to be presented exactly)For future reference please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hoursRegards Bernard |
| 52364979 by Alejandro Téllez | 1 | 2017-09-26 07:17:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.A name and address would help folk to find the guest house. At the moment it looks like it is in a Coop shop.Regards Bernard |
| 52364705 by DShadbolt | 1 | 2017-09-26 07:12:14 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed the tag area=yes as it is uneccessary, the building=yes tag is taken as an area.Regards Bernard |
| 51997969 by camgeddesuk | 1 | 2017-09-17 07:40:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I appreciate that you wanted to add your farm walk onto OSM and the manner (as far as you were aware) is excellent. However the entire route duplicates existing highways. OSM is a live worldwide database which your walk is now a part of. Unfortunately maps and so... |
| 2 | 2017-09-25 19:24:17 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so changeset reverted. Farm added as a named place. | |
| 52063534 by aswiseman | 1 | 2017-09-15 09:44:19 UTC | aswiseman | Sorry, I accidentally converted the Spar shop to a point in the building I added. How can I fix this? |
| 2 | 2017-09-25 19:17:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Mo problem that's fixed now! Regards Bernard | |
| 52353431 by 2busy | 1 | 2017-09-25 15:11:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The school and name are already on the school amenity are as is OSM general practice. |
| 52344847 by Sergiu Sandu | 1 | 2017-09-25 06:53:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, a few more details would be great like the address perhaps. |
| 52325348 by ain albaraha | 1 | 2017-09-24 18:28:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527244266#map=16/24.7647/43.8673 is? You've added it as "coastline" here which seems unlikely.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-09-24 18:29:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | مرحبا ومرحبا بكم في خريطة الشارع المفتوح!هل يمكنك شرح ما هو https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527244266#map=16/24.7647/43.8673؟ لقد أضفته ك "ساحل" هنا يبدو غير محتمل.تحياتي الحارة،أندي | |
| 3 | 2017-09-25 06:02:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Please understand that Way 527116798 is a duplication of highway 411. | |
| 52325876 by pc8800 | 1 | 2017-09-24 16:57:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've capitalised the letters in the postcode for you. |
| 52276209 by dixonbainbridge | 1 | 2017-09-22 17:46:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You actually didn't remove a oneway tag from the bridge, because there wasn't one to remove.You did however add the tag oneway=no. A oneway=no tag is not necessary as usually in the absence of oneway=yes OSM takes there to be no oneway restriction, (except in s... |
| 51969670 by damejude | 1 | 2017-09-12 13:42:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think you might have made a mistake. Is there really a huge pond in that back garden? If not then could you please remove it. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-09-22 06:34:17 UTC | BCNorwich | With no response I've now removed the lake from the garden. | |
| 51906972 by Rondon237 | 1 | 2017-09-12 06:20:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello I just wanted to let you know that your recently added cycleway (Way: 523284869) is placed on top of a footway (Way: 4356852) that has been in the database for many years. Thus a duplication occurs. I see, from the history that the footpath has in the past been tagged as a cycleway. Also tha... |
| 2 | 2017-09-22 06:30:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Thanks for amending this. | |
| 51939922 by nitrox11 | 1 | 2017-09-22 06:23:24 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, there is no note on Green Gate passage.Mapped as it is the footway is shown as going through a building, is this correct? If so is it a passageway through the building? |Which should be mapped accordingly, passage/tunnel.Or a walkway that is part of the shop between a front and back ... |
| 52145848 by İsmət_S | 1 | 2017-09-19 12:12:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the "highway=motorway_junction" tag on Node: 1652765719 is confusing as it is on a junction between a primary and a tertiary highway. If there's no motorway then there's likely no need for a junction tag.Similarly the few nodes tagged as junctions to the SW are IMHO not needed.Re... |
| 2 | 2017-09-19 15:33:24 UTC | İsmət_S | I fixed all of these. Best regards. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-19 16:26:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, yes it all looks good now, Well done and Thanks.Regards Bernard | |
| 52169764 by İsmət_S | 1 | 2017-09-19 11:40:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I notice that there is a duplication of ways (one way directly on top of a second way). This is at the west ends of Way: 525847472 and Way: 525847471 where they join onto Way: Qaravəlli əsas yol (151563580).I can help fix this if you wish.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-09-19 11:42:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Also Way: 525847473 does not join onto Way: 525620908. Again I can help if you wish. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-19 11:44:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Also Way: 525847468 does not join onto Way: Qaravəlli əsas yol (151563580). | |
| 4 | 2017-09-19 12:01:16 UTC | İsmət_S | Hell. Thank you for your attention. I fixed all of these | |
| 5 | 2017-09-19 12:29:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Well done, very sorry but Way: 525847471 is now not joined. | |
| 52149355 by İsmət_S | 1 | 2017-09-19 11:50:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, at junction Node: 1651249775 three highways join the junction but the aerial image seems to indicate that the three ways join prior to the junction with only one way going roughly north from the primary road. |
| 2 | 2017-09-19 11:57:03 UTC | İsmət_S | Hi. Can you fix it please? | |
| 3 | 2017-09-19 12:00:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Also your 20 speed limit sign Node: Max speed (5113273875) is not joined to the highway. It is therefore ignored as, on it's own it is not designating a highway for the restricting limit to be applied to. 20 as a Maxspeed is 20kph, that's rather slow for a primary highway or is it because of the s... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-19 12:02:19 UTC | İsmət_S | it is because of the school | |
| 5 | 2017-09-19 12:23:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've amended the junction where the three roads head north, matching it as closely to the Bing image as I could.I have split the primary highway at roughly where you had your speed markers and tagged the highway as maxspeed=20. Now router software will take notice of the speed limit on that ... | |
| 6 | 2017-09-19 15:28:05 UTC | İsmət_S | I looked at the speed limits. They are 50 KPH | |
| 52145904 by İsmət_S | 1 | 2017-09-19 12:04:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, a Zebra crossing (Node: 5113090051) has several wide black and white stripes painted on the highway, I cannot see any stripes on any aerial image. If the crossing lacks these stripes it should just be tagged as highway=crossing.Regards |
| 2 | 2017-09-19 15:30:07 UTC | İsmət_S | It is because of, aerial images are very old for Azerbaijan | |
| 52048770 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-09-15 06:21:35 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Hello BCNorwich. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506527041 you have tagged `akt:name=...`, which is unkown. I think it should be `alt:name=...`, right? Please have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names #newkey #typo |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 06:26:26 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Sorry, i was to fast: `alt_name`, underscore instead of colon... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-15 06:51:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, thanks for the comment, yes my mistake trying to to quickly with my two finger typing.I tried altering it between your above comments and was going to say I think JOSM actually allowed akt:name= but on amending now it warned against alt:name= I have now amended it to alt_name= All now OK.By... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-15 06:54:44 UTC | Harald Hartmann | http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm | |
| 5 | 2017-09-15 06:59:12 UTC | BCNorwich | Thanks | |
| 52051006 by aswiseman | 1 | 2017-09-15 06:25:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just wanted to let you know that Knights Way has been drawn over a footpath without joining to it.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 09:19:31 UTC | aswiseman | Thanks for this. The footpath no longer exists (part of the old golf course or the nature reserver that replaced it), so I have deleted it. | |
| 52052012 by aswiseman | 1 | 2017-09-15 06:22:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello,If Knighys Way is private then the tag access=private should be added to the way not included in the name tag. Then add permitted access (to allow for access onto the footpath that Knights Way crosses). Also the road/footpath junction ought to be joined up.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 09:24:07 UTC | aswiseman | Hi Bernard. Thanks for letting me know the convention. I have removed "(Private Road)" from the name (even though it appears on the street sign this way ) and have tagged it with "access" = "private", as you suggested. Andrew | |
| 52051753 by aswiseman | 1 | 2017-09-15 06:15:20 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi your new way crosses an existing cycleway, if they phisically join on the ground then this ought to be represented in OSM.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 09:29:11 UTC | aswiseman | Hi Bernard. They do physically meet, so I have joined them up. Thanks, Andrew | |
| 52002320 by EnDanMap | 1 | 2017-09-13 12:33:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The school name and website are on the school area outline so don't need to be added again. |
| 51997502 by Iain McNaught | 1 | 2017-09-13 12:27:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The fact that swimming_pool does not show as blue on the cycle map has nothing to do with the OSM database but rather the specific way the cycle map is rendered. We are requested to map what is on the ground not map to show up certain coulers for features. (The p... |
| 51990813 by Palash Davé | 1 | 2017-09-13 06:56:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've drawn in some house outlines in that road so the houses could be numbered rather than the road, making it a lot better.If you don't want to do the numbering I could do it if you give me a few building number positions.Regards BernardPS I've drawn... |
| 51969507 by damejude | 1 | 2017-09-12 13:50:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, are the fields really named f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6. These numbers might refer to area designations but not necessarily be actual names.Also a similar query for the lake, is it really named "lake"? If it is then should it be capitalised to "Lake"Regards Bernard |
| 51921419 by nitrox11 | 1 | 2017-09-11 06:00:48 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The footpath you added does not look quite right. A lit public highway (footway) would not normally go through a building terminating at its front wall. Is there a passageway through the building, if so it needs to be added? Does the highway carry on to join ... |
| 51910383 by thegallaghers8 | 1 | 2017-09-10 17:38:33 UTC | BCNorwich | My apologies for not welcoming you to OpenStreetMap. Welcome to OSM!I wanted to explain that this section of Mapletree Lane which is part of St Peter's Way is included in relation (#140,533) specifically for the way. Therefore your addition of the footway is unnecessary and is also a duplication o... |
| 51909879 by thegallaghers8 | 1 | 2017-09-10 17:15:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, removed the sidewalk tag, sidewalk is beside vehicular highway. |
| 51909856 by thegallaghers8 | 1 | 2017-09-10 17:13:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, a sidewalk is a footway beside a vehicular highway so I've removed the sidewalk tag. |
| 51717841 by mirenestudioslimited | 1 | 2017-09-04 17:29:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your changset that removed a bus route relation detail by changing it to a studios details. |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 17:40:48 UTC | BCNorwich | I have tried to find the address where your studio is situated without luck, it's not on your website. If you could give an address I might be able to help get your business onto the OSM database. OSM only maps what is verifiable on the ground.Regards Bernard | |
| 50259872 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-09-04 06:32:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507335422Removed self intersection, tagged courtyard |
| 51629628 by TR42 | 1 | 2017-09-04 06:23:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 520419510Hi, I fixed a self intersection problem on this area outline. Also changed tag to fell, you state it is fell which I agree but then tag wrongly as heath. The fell tag does do something it tells the database the area is a fell area not a heath. You can render fell areas.Regards Be... |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 10:40:00 UTC | SomeoneElse_Revert | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51714984 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of poor-quality edits following discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-September/020576.html | |
| 51691340 by dflores | 1 | 2017-09-03 14:30:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've amended the building levels to two for a semi detached house. 2 living levels, 1 roof level as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildingsRegards Bernard |
| 51593242 by BaileyPumfleet | 1 | 2017-08-31 05:49:28 UTC | BCNorwich | With just a name the feature would not be rendered, I've dded the building and a few more details. |
| 51510461 by Essex_Boy | 1 | 2017-08-29 10:28:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 519344354Hi the tagging value green is not usually used with the key landuse. Can you explain what you mean and possibly amend the tag?Regards Bernard |
| 51505184 by Nastya Vyaznikova | 1 | 2017-08-28 13:46:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have changed the Westminster Abbey website back to point to the sites homepage rather than the Japanese welcome page. Like this anyone clicking on the link can choose the page/language they wish.Regards Bernard |
| 51495130 by Alexx298 | 1 | 2017-08-28 06:24:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, skate board area detail tagged to the area. |
| 51495113 by Alexx298 | 1 | 2017-08-28 06:15:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, again "Double bus stop" seems like a description rather than a formal name.If you take the information stated on the bus stop signs you can add the information so the OSM database can recognize it. How to's are on the web, also a good thing is to look at how others have formally mapp... |
| 51495077 by Alexx298 | 1 | 2017-08-28 06:06:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I wonder if "Woodslide link picnic area" is actually a name or really a description, if it's a name then each word ought to be capitalised. Same with the POI, "Woodside link Picnic benches", is this a name?Also your POI states a park as well as the area stating a park, th... |
| 51495047 by Alexx298 | 1 | 2017-08-28 05:59:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the cycleway is connected to a stream. Does it cross the stream or should it not go there? |
| 51495016 by Alexx298 | 1 | 2017-08-28 05:52:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to let you know that you've somehow duplicated parts of the footpath across Wheatfield Green. Also is there a zebra crossing over Wheatfield Rd, if so then that needs also to be corrected to OSM best practice.If you need help adjusting this please... |
| 51232331 by Essex_Boy | 1 | 2017-08-23 16:53:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 516616957 fixed several self intersections |
| 51249888 by condorman | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:18:07 UTC | BCNorwich | joined the two buildings at south |
| 51125721 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:14:43 UTC | BCNorwich | changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51125663 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:14:10 UTC | BCNorwich | changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51125644 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:13:52 UTC | BCNorwich | changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51125604 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:13:20 UTC | BCNorwich | changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51125573 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:12:57 UTC | BCNorwich | changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51125567 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-22 07:12:38 UTC | BCNorwich | changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51252057 by Jazzyfizzy | 1 | 2017-08-19 14:59:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the building is several properties frpm 260 to 270 I think. therefore I've removed number 260 from the whole building, (also corrected the postcode. |
| 51244209 by condorman | 1 | 2017-08-19 06:25:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I squared up your new buildings, (this can be achieved in iD editor by selecting the building and from the right click menu click "square". They look better by being squared off.I also terraced the semi- detached houses keeping the numbering correct... |
| 51244410 by condorman | 1 | 2017-08-19 06:09:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I just wanted to point out that you have to be careful you don't inadvertently move other objects while mapping. You actually dragged a highway node (Tivoli Road) quite some distance. Not to worry though I've already reverted the change. I also made a small a... |
| 50259396 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-17 10:22:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507330969 self intersection fixed. |
| 50260083 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-12 16:40:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: Holy Family Catholic Church (507336776) fixed the self intersection of the area outline |
| 2 | 2017-08-12 16:45:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507336773 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline | |
| 3 | 2017-08-17 10:03:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507336761 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline | |
| 4 | 2017-08-17 10:08:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507336757 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline | |
| 5 | 2017-08-17 10:11:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507336755 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline | |
| 6 | 2017-08-17 10:16:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507336735 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline | |
| 7 | 2017-08-17 10:19:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507336801 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline | |
| 50807783 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-05 10:08:00 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580625 Fixed the self intersection of the building outline. |
| 2 | 2017-08-06 06:17:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580882 deleted duplicate | |
| 3 | 2017-08-06 06:19:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580881 remove self intersection | |
| 4 | 2017-08-06 06:19:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580883 delete duplication | |
| 5 | 2017-08-06 06:23:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580874 delete duplication | |
| 6 | 2017-08-06 06:25:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580875 remove self intersection, redraw areas | |
| 7 | 2017-08-06 06:38:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580871 remove self intersection, redraw areas | |
| 8 | 2017-08-06 06:41:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580707 remove self intersection | |
| 9 | 2017-08-06 06:50:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580696 redraw, retag | |
| 10 | 2017-08-06 06:51:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580695 deleted duplicate area | |
| 11 | 2017-08-06 06:51:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580694 remove self intersection | |
| 12 | 2017-08-06 06:54:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580801 deleted duplicate area | |
| 13 | 2017-08-06 06:55:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580800 remove self intersection, redraw areas | |
| 14 | 2017-08-06 07:06:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580796 This way is partially duplicated, has self intersection and is drawn over existing features. Not enough on bing to determine how to correct. | |
| 15 | 2017-08-06 07:19:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580825 remove self intersection and triplication of part of outline | |
| 16 | 2017-08-06 07:23:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580562 deleted duplicate area | |
| 17 | 2017-08-11 07:34:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580767 deleted duplicate area | |
| 18 | 2017-08-11 07:37:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580766 remove self intersection to separate two distinct areas from being joined | |
| 19 | 2017-08-11 08:13:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580505 remove self intersection | |
| 20 | 2017-08-17 06:03:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580624 fixed self intersection | |
| 21 | 2017-08-17 06:09:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 516287886 fixed self intersection, corrected area outline | |
| 22 | 2017-08-17 06:12:32 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580796 fixed self intersection, corrected area outline | |
| 23 | 2017-08-17 06:16:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580569 fixed self intersection, corrected area outline | |
| 24 | 2017-08-17 06:18:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512580572 remove recreation ground which is part of mapped school ground | |
| 51126122 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-15 05:48:24 UTC | BCNorwich | Squared up outline, changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51126011 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-15 05:34:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Squared up outline, changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51126001 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-15 05:33:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Squared up outline, changed area=yes to building=yes |
| 51125986 by amh754 | 1 | 2017-08-15 05:32:15 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Squared up outline, changed area=yes to building=yesRegards Bernard |
| 50260333 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-12 15:06:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507338139 fixed self intersection of area outlines. |
| 50137086 by Dragonmaster306 | 1 | 2017-07-09 05:58:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The new line you have added to the live worldwide OSM database in Primrose Grove has no tags to describe what it is. It is therefore of no value to OSM. Further it in part duplicates the line of an existing way (a footpath). Also one branch of your way ends wit... |
| 2 | 2017-08-09 10:09:19 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so removed the duplicate, untagged way. Next visit I'll check to see if there are more paths here. | |
| 50839570 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-06 14:42:11 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: Station Field Allotment Site (512867524) Fix self intersection of area outline, delete duplicated section, amend area outlines to bing. |
| 50855748 by BCNorwich | 1 | 2017-08-05 09:03:06 UTC | will_p | I have reverted this changeset. Mapping spiral walkways and stairways is difficult and I'm sure the current mapping could be improved, however, your changes made no sense to me. You added a stairway that doesn't exist and joined up ways that are on different levels. |
| 2 | 2017-08-05 09:27:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, very sorry that's my fault, I didn't study the layout close enough. I can see now what you're trying to achieve. Thanks for reverting it.Regards Bernard | |
| 50850910 by krackers | 1 | 2017-08-05 06:18:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The area you are amending to residential is already within an existing residential area. So the new area would not normally be needed and would be deleted/replaced with the new features. However as the new features have not yet been mapped and to avoid anyone re-... |
| 50779736 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-04 15:39:05 UTC | BCNorwich | West Stow Country Park (512311336) Fix self intersection linking of areas. The country park is south of the C631 |
| 2 | 2017-08-04 15:44:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512311398 Removed duplicated area tagged as leisure=recreation_ground (ought to have been landuse=recreation_ground) | |
| 3 | 2017-08-04 16:15:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 512311387 deleted duplicate building. | |
| 32505183 by mrpacmanmap | 1 | 2017-08-03 06:13:42 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 359424376No need to advertise your inadequacies. |
| 2 | 2017-08-03 06:13:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 359424376Deleted | |
| 14870735 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-08-02 15:05:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Deleted duplicated wood Way: 203731195 |
| 50754014 by luciecohen | 1 | 2017-08-01 18:14:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I don't suppose you are aware that OSM is a live worldwide database that is able to instantaneously change the characteristics of hundreds of folks maps. I hope you can realise that the live database is not the place to conduct tests. (Tests can be done off line ... |
| 2 | 2017-08-01 22:01:11 UTC | luciecohen | Hi Bernard,My apologies - I didn't appreciate the nature of the programme. Thank god I didn't do more damage! Thanks for being so polite in your response - I'll leave the site alone in future. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-02 11:12:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you want to add test data you can try https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ - it's just like the "live" site but with just test data in it. | |
| 4 | 2017-08-02 20:59:00 UTC | freebeer | Hallo Lucie,May I repeat the welcome Bernard gave...You wrote:"I'll leave the site alone in future."Please don't... Constructive contributions are always welcome, and there is a lot to be done, perhaps less in London relative to elsewhere -- but I see dozens of unresolved notes ne... | |
| 50731973 by Nic Leaf | 1 | 2017-08-01 05:43:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You somehow added two POI for YouTube, I've removed the duplicate and added the address and website. |
| 50617741 by Joyeeta | 1 | 2017-07-27 14:29:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see you may be having problems. Was there anything in particular you wanted to add to OSM? Can I help in any way?Regards Bernard |
| 48144208 by Neil Beveridge | 1 | 2017-07-27 08:22:28 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, reference your recently mapped footpath River Ayr Way. I notice that there are several points at which it crosses over other highways with no connection to them. Also in places it duplicates existing ways. |
| 50602065 by EntaNaeMere | 1 | 2017-07-27 06:13:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just wanted to point out that Caister Hall grounds are not a building. Nor do the grounds extend to the center of Stoke Road and Caister Lane. You've already placed the name and type of building on the building outline, these only need stating/tagging once.... |
| 2 | 2017-07-27 06:50:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Way: 393986133 is a footpath in part used by agriculture it is in the main trod out by feet, it's never been constructed as a footway. In fact for many years it was left obstructed by those responsible for the PRoW. It's actually only in the recent few years that a mark is made over the cross fi... | |
| 50582107 by MoragBirdBoxAvenue | 1 | 2017-07-26 12:44:49 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you inadvertently moved a bus stop, no problem though I've reverted the change. I mapped the area of your new Pocket Park and included the website. Hope that's OK, good luck. Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-07-26 13:12:33 UTC | MoragBirdBoxAvenue | Thank you, thank you, thank you! I was a bit baffled about my E10 postcode search first suggesting a location near Hampstead Heath. And as you say - I had no intention of moving a bus stop. Thanks for including the pocket park. | |
| 50376490 by freayd | 1 | 2017-07-26 06:22:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, something went wrong with the address interpolation on the High Street, south side, even numbers. Please see : http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-0.57195&lat=51.23594&zoom=17&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_nod... |
| 2 | 2017-07-26 09:47:28 UTC | freayd | Hi. Thanks for your comment, I already noticed the issue last time. I surveyed the ground once more. It should be fixed with the changeset 50582298. | |
| 50257426 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-25 10:26:55 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507312609 fix self intersection problem |
| 2 | 2017-07-25 10:28:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507312540 fix self intersection problem | |
| 49529854 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-25 08:43:25 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 500429874 fix self intersection |
| 49557818 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-25 08:39:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 500681296 fix self intersection |
| 50258949 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-24 07:45:37 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507325975 remove self intersection of area outline and courtyard |
| 2 | 2017-07-24 07:49:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507325954 same | |
| 3 | 2017-07-24 07:53:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507325955 same | |
| 4 | 2017-07-24 07:59:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 507326037 and again | |
| 32523185 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-24 05:42:27 UTC | BCNorwich | removing several duplicated wood areas |
| 50407111 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-24 05:31:01 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: (508713808) delete duplicated/self intersecting outline of playground which included building |
| 50376348 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-24 05:18:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 508410491 fixed self intersection of area outline. |
| 50223952 by Amberwood | 1 | 2017-07-22 16:27:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, same problem here as with Manor Road. I've removed the duplicate and placed your new oneway tag on the existing section of Vicarage Road after appropriately splitting it.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-07-23 18:59:58 UTC | Amberwood | Hi.No problem - my first attempt at adding updates. Manor Road looks good but not sure why Vicarage Road is not showing one way at all now?? | |
| 3 | 2017-07-23 19:22:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, the section of Vicarage Road from the cycleway (just south of Manor Gardens) south to Manor Road is tagged as oneway going southwards. This is how you had tagged it. Could you refresh your browser or reload the page that shows the oneway not appearing please? Then see if the oneway appears.... | |
| 49504883 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-23 06:24:21 UTC | BCNorwich | way_id: \t500205241 fixed self intersection |
| 2 | 2017-07-23 06:26:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 500205246 fixed self intersection | |
| 3 | 2017-07-23 06:31:14 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 500205249 fixed self intersection | |
| 49505427 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-23 06:14:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Fixed self intersection on Way: 500209862 |
| 2 | 2017-07-23 06:18:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 500209558 fixed self intersection | |
| 49504992 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-23 06:16:31 UTC | BCNorwich | Way: 500206241 fixed self intersection |
| 50257796 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-13 20:37:55 UTC | DaveF | Hi RowlandTo map entities with voids in the middle we use mulipolygon relations: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygonhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507315798 |
| 2 | 2017-07-22 12:24:12 UTC | BCNorwich | I've pointed out this problem (through changeset comments) to mapper Rowland many times and corrected dozens of these instances. Despite this there has been no response from Rowland and data continues to be added incorrectly. Rowland also maps land/building areas on top of existing land/building a... | |
| 3 | 2017-07-22 15:43:16 UTC | DaveF | Rowland was/is under an acknowledgement ban so unable to message via changeset, but I did receive a DM (although it didn't really address my concerns). It's surprising someone with 7K edits is unaware of MPs & his 'blitzkrieg' mapping technique of not tidying up after himself is *very* annoying. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-22 20:32:55 UTC | Rowland | Dozens is a little bit of an exaggeration, as it was once this year, and once in 2015 | |
| 5 | 2017-07-23 05:37:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Yes once this year and once in 2015 are the commented changesets.Dozens is likely an understatement. Your attention was probably only drawn to the ones I commented on (even though the comments seemed to provoke no response). The dozens of self intersecting outlines on areas (buildings, water, wo... | |
| 50224114 by Amberwood | 1 | 2017-07-22 16:12:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I looked at your alterations to Manor Road and see that you inadvertently added two more highways atop the existing ways. The best way to achieve amendments like this is to edit the existing way, this also allows the history of change to be kept intact. Triplic... |
| 50057641 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-21 06:24:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, just wanted to point out that buildings with courtyards do not have to have self intersecting outlines. Regards |
| 2 | 2017-07-22 10:25:17 UTC | ndm | See discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50257796Looks to be semi-automated import of OSOpenMapLocal items. | |
| 50398003 by Concrete Hair | 1 | 2017-07-19 13:03:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended your opening hours and address tagging to suit OSM best practice. The world will now be better informed of your business. Regards Bernard |
| 48990358 by CrossCountryApp | 1 | 2017-07-19 07:50:26 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, just wanted to point out that I think this is the 2016 route not the 2017 route.There are several problems with it anyway. It crosses over on itself three times. Crosses existing roads without joining about ten times. Crosses water five times with no indication as to the manner of crossing.... |
| 50320182 by castlecorbenic | 1 | 2017-07-16 11:50:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've adjusted the opening times tag to suit OSM practice (months not indicated are taken as closed), and removed house_number=.Regards Bernard |
| 50299786 by Gammer_edit | 1 | 2017-07-15 07:41:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, this way (the steps) does not join to the old railway path. |
| 2 | 2017-07-15 08:26:24 UTC | Gammer_edit | Maybe you would like to explain further instead of leaving it hanging in the air. I am a beginner. A solution or advice would be preferable. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-15 13:57:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, no offense intended, some folk don't take kindly to being offered advice. Right, I take it that the steps are intended to join the old railway. So that you have a route from the road along the path, then the steps and onto and along the railway. SatNav routing can then follow this route.\... | |
| 50205780 by Gammer_edit | 1 | 2017-07-15 07:37:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there, I'd just like to point out that for the way south from Ham you have mapped two ways (a highway=bridleway and a highway=unclassified). You've also tagged the access as (in parts) private, yes, permissive. Your new way does not join with Ham Road, and the highway=road close to Ham Road,... |
| 2 | 2017-07-15 08:21:51 UTC | Gammer_edit | The road south from Ham is a permissive bridleway on both a private and public road. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-15 13:24:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, yes I can see that but you have drawn two roads/highways, one on top of the other. Between the road junction at Ham and your mapped permissive bridleway which goes eastwards. The manner to map this is to consolidate all relevant tags on just one highway. To have two highways one on top of the ... | |
| 50285817 by The Westbridge | 1 | 2017-07-14 17:46:01 UTC | BCNorwich | No need for website tag to be duplicated. Duplicate has been removed, regards. |
| 50200322 by Lawlor Taxis | 1 | 2017-07-11 16:04:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there, it's not usual to tag buildings as landuse=residential better to use building=residential on the building and landuse=? on the area.Anyway the buildings you have retagged look like they are the old school buildings not the new houses. so the whole area needs to be redrawn.Regards Be... |
| 50152259 by Vinczente | 1 | 2017-07-09 16:54:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, the drinking water is already mapped so I've removed this duplicate. Regards. |
| 50147783 by Kite8585 | 1 | 2017-07-09 14:52:13 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.St Pancras International Station is already mapped, the POI just a few yards away from your POI. So I have removed this duplicate.Regards Bernard |
| 50042175 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-08 07:54:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Revert changeset to regain the original history (history was lost when houses redrawn, best to adjust whats already mapped thus keeping the history intact), remove the duplicate building, redraw the buildings, properly tag addresses to conform, change ele to conform. |
| 50074162 by Provo Steel Buildings | 1 | 2017-07-06 05:57:39 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see your original POI has been removed from London.You are now on the correct continent and near the right city, but the POI is still incorrectly placed for that address. If you need any help please just ask, I could fix it if you wish?One other thing, why d... |
| 50054103 by BeardedBerns | 1 | 2017-07-05 16:50:30 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I've made corrections made to the address so that it conforms to OpenStreetMap best practice.Regards Bernard |
| 44687575 by skyegod | 1 | 2016-12-27 04:35:57 UTC | nammala | Hi skyegod,Thanks and contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind adding cricket pitch and football pitch in the Imagery. It seems to be inappropriate in the Map. Could you please confirm.Regards,nammala |
| 2 | 2017-07-04 07:18:45 UTC | BCNorwich | Descriptive names removed. | |
| 48448591 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-03 19:11:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Duplicate way removed, the original way should be amended not another way placed on top of it. |
| 48452747 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-03 19:07:22 UTC | BCNorwich | The maxwidth must refer/be connected to the highway, not a node unconnected to the highway. "Width Restriction" is a description not a name.The width must be in the correct manner (maxwidth=6'6") to be recognized.Nodes are removed as I cannot correct them. |
| 49055183 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-03 18:50:33 UTC | BCNorwich | Name corrected |
| 49055528 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-03 18:49:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Address corrected |
| 49981649 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-03 18:10:26 UTC | BCNorwich | According to their website which I've added the name is "Saracens". I've amended accordingly. Regard |
| 49982367 by Norfolk Boy | 1 | 2017-07-03 17:53:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, this POI has several problems, the city, postcode, street and name should use capitol letters. There is no hospital or emergency facility. There is nothing nearby named "entrance_to_surgery".I have properly added the address to Bayfield Surgery building, also added the website, s... |
| 49772047 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-02 06:57:38 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed duplicate building (502893780), several buildings can easily be seen here. |
| 49807303 by TRUDGILL | 1 | 2017-07-01 07:54:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Removed duplicated way. |
| 49807157 by TRUDGILL | 1 | 2017-07-01 07:46:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended your house and garden additions to better tie in with the way that these items are usually mapped/tagged. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-07-01 11:13:19 UTC | TRUDGILL | Thank you Bernard. | |
| 49596240 by ColinT | 1 | 2017-06-30 06:43:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Thank You |
| 49930441 by johnny5alive | 1 | 2017-06-30 06:38:10 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your changes/additions ref The Relay Building have resulted in the adjacent building being dragged out of shape. Also there is now a building on top of another building. I would suggest you revert your changes and try again but please properly inspect your chan... |
| 49763583 by Larkmeadow | 1 | 2017-06-23 14:52:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Did you mean to amend the name of that section? Because nothing has changed. Princes Walk needs to be split into two sections at the corner then the north section renamed. If you need help or would like it amended for you please just ask? Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-06-23 15:35:19 UTC | Larkmeadow | Hi Bernard,I cannot figure out how to make these changes!I noticed that that small section of road parallel to the main road was incorrectly shown as Princes Walk when it should be Normanston Drive. (ie The same as the main road. I know, I used to live there!) It only becomes Princes Walk at the... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-23 17:24:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Bill, I'll guide you on how to proceed with the iD editor.Highlight/select the way (road) you want to edit in this case Princes Walk.Place your cursor/pointer over the node (small circle) at the point you wish to divide the road into two sections.Right click the node, you get a drop down... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-23 17:29:09 UTC | BCNorwich | Forgot to say if you want to insert a node to split a way at another place other than an existing node. Place cursor at the position and double left click. | |
| 5 | 2017-06-23 17:59:58 UTC | Larkmeadow | Think that's done now, thanks.Much easier on a laptop than on a phone ! | |
| 6 | 2017-06-23 18:07:54 UTC | BCNorwich | Yes looks OK!Bye! | |
| 48695845 by catrionaswanson | 1 | 2017-06-22 07:39:52 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello,Your mapping of the Port Salford Greenway is done in a way that duplicates some highways, (particularly Grange Road, Farm Road). Is there a separate cycleway here? If not the the cycleway status should be tagged/drawn as part of the existing highway. Duplicating highways disrupts routeing on... |
| 49261631 by skyegod | 1 | 2017-06-22 06:41:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello Sidewalk beside a highway a better tagged as part of that highway except if separated by a barrier of some kind. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk I've removed this footpath because mapped such it is on top of the road, makes a duplication and messes wi... |
| 49662127 by ilovejeans | 1 | 2017-06-19 12:04:27 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have removed your advertising nodes.There are not two shops in the middle of the street. Your business is online and does not to my knowledge have a high street outlet that could be mapped, (not even an office). Regards |
| 49319306 by Supabento | 1 | 2017-06-07 06:45:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your highway changes to their original state. Reason being that no missing road section was added, two roads were duplicated and a 20mph limit was removed.I can't actually see what you wanted to achieve but if you can explain maybe someone can h... |
| 2 | 2017-06-18 18:46:00 UTC | Supabento | When I was looking at the map it appeared that the sections I added were missing from the map. I was using the satellite view if this makes any difference? Apologies for the confusion. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-18 19:00:21 UTC | BCNorwich | No problem, does the map you're looking at look OK now? If not could you give a link to it? Regards Bernard | |
| 4 | 2017-06-18 21:32:40 UTC | Supabento | Yeah it looks fine now | |
| 27960712 by ColinT | 1 | 2017-06-16 06:26:58 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi Node: 3273481349 tagged as a stile is not connected to a highway therefore it cannot be determined to which way the stile is a barrier. (The barrier (stile) should be connected/joined to the way it disrupts). Regards |
| 49577143 by monospaced | 1 | 2017-06-16 06:03:19 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, just wanted to let you know that the park area (453552380, v2) has become distorted. Regards |
| 49571035 by Toineverd | 1 | 2017-06-16 05:55:53 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Can you explain your reasoning for placing a highway=rest_area here please? I refer you to :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_areaIt does not look like a conventional rest area so I'll remove the node if I don't get a comment. Regards. |
| 45179522 by andyfrizzle | 1 | 2017-06-14 06:44:03 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, Just wanted to point out that the way "highway=unclassifiedref=U3064" (south section) that you've added duplicates the ways that are already mapped on that route. The duplication of highways seriously disrupts any attempt by software to route over these ways.At the river y... |
| 2 | 2017-06-14 13:21:19 UTC | andyfrizzle | BCNorwich, Thanks for the feedback. I've reviewed and hopefully correctly amended the highways. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-15 16:58:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi Andy, I have a few concerns about these edits.You have changed this way from a track to unclassified and included the surface=unpaved, in the UK it is reasonable to expect an unclassified road to be surfaced, I believe that unless it has been surfaced it should have been left as a track.What ... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-15 18:17:51 UTC | andyfrizzle | trigpoint, I dont want to start an argument of any sort, but it was my understanding that contributors to the OSM project should make their contributions as accurate as possible, and that has been my intention, based on facts.The road, edited by myself, is an unclassified road, lawfully usable b... | |
| 5 | 2017-06-16 11:51:40 UTC | SK53 | This does indeed appear to be classified as an unclassified road by the county council. There will always be edge cases where the rules-of-thumb fall down, and this is one of them. I don't believe that it should be mapped as such on OSM: highway=track is much more appropriate. A couple of important ... | |
| 6 | 2017-06-16 11:58:07 UTC | Richard | highway=unclassified, surface=unpaved is ok but slightly unidiomatic for UK mapping. There's nothing wrong with it per se - there are lots of dirt roads in the States mapped that way, for example - but it's slightly unexpected in a UK context where highway=unclassified isn't used by custom for such ... | |
| 7 | 2017-06-16 12:05:46 UTC | SK53 | Just thought I'd add links to the similar highways which I mentioned earlier:Tillington, West Sussex: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273951783Two in Marefield, Leics:Red Lodge Road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198802841Blackspinney Lane: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19515... | |
| 8 | 2017-06-16 14:03:04 UTC | andyfrizzle | Thanks for the further input, I have no problems making the amendments as suggested prior. Northumberland has a vast network of unsurfaced unclassified roads with vastly varying roads surfaces. I would not be surprised is there are more than a hundred in this county alone. I will try and work throug... | |
| 9 | 2017-06-16 14:22:24 UTC | SK53 | Thanks Andy. I've added this to the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#Unpaved_Country_Roads. It's largely based on the discussion here, but I should also add some examples from Northumberland too. I think pressure of use in SE England, Peak District etc has l... | |
| 49453088 by Petko Delchev | 1 | 2017-06-12 06:18:04 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed your residential area (Cardea) from because it was within another residential area (duplication), I've added a new place=suburb (Cardea) to reflect your new residential area. |
| 49347901 by Alex_Bear5 | 1 | 2017-06-08 06:14:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just wanted to let you know that if you zoom in the houses can be drawn with more precision and therefore more detail, then square the corners up. You end up with a beautifully rendered map.If you need any help please just ask, Regards Bernard |
| 49330466 by thebeaumont | 1 | 2017-06-07 10:36:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, please be advised that your hotel is already mapped to the OSM database, thus the new POI is remove as it is a duplication. |
| 49136116 by essexwebstudio | 1 | 2017-06-07 06:09:40 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I've updated your tag information to conform to OSM best practice. Regards |
| 49048106 by Theo Goyvaerts | 1 | 2017-06-07 05:50:34 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, your new information tourism=attraction has been added to the existing mapped features, the duplicate features therefore unneeded are removed. Regards |
| 49302884 by Zayd9 | 1 | 2017-06-06 13:03:20 UTC | BCNorwich | It may be used as a park but it is officially a registered common. |
| 46228521 by SomePlaceMapperCT | 1 | 2017-06-06 06:37:47 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, I think something might have gone wrong with the grass, heath and residential areas, (squared off and now have self intersections on the outlines). Regards |
| 49213798 by senior800 | 1 | 2017-06-03 08:10:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've added back the landuse=recreation_ground tag to Ketts Park. The park is a recreation ground and indeed Ketts Park is a Community & Recreation facility.An area can have several descriptive tags (a landuse and an amenity tag).Regards Bernard |
| 48788012 by jimmyrocker | 1 | 2017-05-18 16:59:57 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, can you give more details about the park the name perhaps. Because that area contains much that does not look like a park. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2017-06-01 06:26:38 UTC | BCNorwich | No response so what looks like fiction is removed. | |
| 48940122 by firststrideevents | 1 | 2017-05-28 06:22:29 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I reverted your recent changes to OSM because I can find nothing to verify them as available to general folk. They look like a route used by a select group and thus are not suitable for OSM. By all means please use OSM to create your own routes (and even print th... |
| 49011903 by kancelaria zabrze | 1 | 2017-05-27 05:51:23 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello there and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I have reverted your changes because they drag some highways a long way out of position.You may not be aware of this happening. What you inadvertently uploaded to the database is immediately used to change the map used by folk all over the world. So pleas... |
| 48968375 by Sajid Khan (QUALITY DRY CLEANERS) | 1 | 2017-05-25 14:53:34 UTC | BCNorwich | This business was mapped as a POI, I have amalgamated all info on one POI and removed the duplicate. Regards. |
| 48820669 by Laurie_cs | 1 | 2017-05-25 06:53:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, Did you mean for FP 60 to join onto Great North Road? because now it only goes to the edge of the wood area. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-05-27 10:44:39 UTC | Laurie_cs | Originally yes, but on reflection I will extend to the road. Local maps show the path only going to the woods, OS map shows the path going to the road. will extend and thanks for your comments. Laurie | |
| 48919218 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-05-25 05:48:43 UTC | BCNorwich | Several of the buildings redrawn without the self intersection on the outlines. Please have a look it's easy to do. |
| 48915141 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-05-25 05:36:36 UTC | BCNorwich | Hatfield Police Station And Magistrates Court (495456784, v1)This is duplication and outline has self intersection, (not to OSM best practice) so removed. |
| 48913237 by Rahul Patel1 | 1 | 2017-05-23 17:03:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, I removed the sidewalk tags, they are used on a footpath beside a road but separated from the road usually by a kerb.Removed several duplicated sections of path and tidied up some paths, circularised a couple of paths. Regards Bernard |
| 48761767 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-05-22 06:55:17 UTC | BCNorwich | Adjust areas, remove self intersecting section, remove duplicated areas from school. |
| 2 | 2017-05-22 06:59:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Expand abbreviation of church name. Adjust building outlines. | |
| 48836669 by londonofficechris | 1 | 2017-05-20 14:23:16 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, you've placed the node (1689605515 105 Fenchurch St) on the party wall between two buildings. |
| 48826117 by Shanon Sycamore | 1 | 2017-05-20 05:52:23 UTC | BCNorwich | I set post code to OSM standard. |
| 48797678 by Laurie_cs | 1 | 2017-05-18 19:30:21 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your moving of the footpath has also dragged the roads at each end out of place. May I suggest reverting the changes and starting again. I can revert everything back as it was for you if you wish. The two roads need to be corrected as now routing is messed up. Re... |
| 2 | 2017-05-18 21:01:52 UTC | Laurie_cs | Just looked at the roads and they appear ok, but if you think they are wrong please revert all changes and I will try to move the footpath again. The Great North Road appears strange it has 3 lines connecting to each other.Laurie | |
| 3 | 2017-05-19 06:13:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello, the problems with Dancers Hill Road are the same as the Great North Road. What has happened is that the path has been dragged to a new position without it being disconnected from the two roads. This inadvertently pulls the two roads out of shape by the same amount. The path has then been amen... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-19 06:15:56 UTC | BCNorwich | Forgot to say I can see what you are trying to do and could make those changes if you wish, though I'm sure you'd like to do it yourself. | |
| 5 | 2017-05-19 07:01:12 UTC | Laurie_cs | Thanks for the explanations and correction, As you rightly point out I would like make the changes, correctly, myself. This is the first one I have tried. Again thanks for your help, this is a very useful tool. I have UK Maps on my phone and they take a lot of info from the OS maps but do not hav... | |
| 48786832 by Swirlysgaming | 1 | 2017-05-18 14:54:41 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.You drew the park area again rather than updating/adjusting the existing mapped area. I have removed the duplication and tagged the area as park, leaving existing tags and history in situ.Regards Bernard |
| 48724108 by Сергей Гвоздик | 1 | 2017-05-16 13:27:22 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your POI guest house is placed in the roadway. As such and without an address, name or other contact info it is of little or no use to anyone. Could you please rectify this if not the POI will be removed in due course. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-05-17 17:11:58 UTC | trigpoint | It translates as Oli's House, suggesting that this is yet another maps.me personal marker.I am reverting this rubbish | |
| 48726525 by churchpropertyinsurance | 1 | 2017-05-16 13:11:44 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello your POI appears in the middle of a street far away from the stated address. If this is a mistake then please be advised that the POI has been removed so you can try again.In which case help is offered if you need it, just ask.If however this is just crude advertising (which it looks like) t... |
| 48711831 by lyut | 1 | 2017-05-16 06:09:50 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello you inadvertently added a highway=footway tag to the outline of part of a residential area (making it the longest footway I've seen). I have now removed the footway tag. Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2017-05-16 07:55:17 UTC | lyut | Thanks for spotting that, silly mistake on my part. | |
| 48692464 by DGGteal41 | 1 | 2017-05-15 07:56:03 UTC | BCNorwich | If your changeset statement is correct then you've placed this POI in the wrong position. That hotel is south of here. Regards Bernard |
| 48679239 by Pierrick Gatellier | 1 | 2017-05-14 19:12:08 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.I can find no reference to a government office of this name and the area is residential. Could you please give more information, address and point to the actual building. Thanks. |
| 48660987 by boogasm | 1 | 2017-05-14 05:41:07 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your leisure centre building outline is lacking in detail compared with the background image. It is also a duplication, thus I have removed the duplicate taking care to transfer your address tags onto the original building. Regards Bernard. |
| 48646265 by Hypersupremacy | 1 | 2017-05-13 14:22:06 UTC | BCNorwich | Reverted your change. Byron's Pool is a local nature reserve, please see the tagged webpage. There are numerous County Council references to the nature reserve, none state as being a park. |
| 48575856 by PeppyPupper | 1 | 2017-05-12 06:47:46 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, in the absence of a oneway tag it is implied that there is not a oneway restriction. Thus the oneway=no tag in (except in exceptional cases, please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway) is not actually needed. |
| 2 | 2017-05-12 20:43:26 UTC | PeppyPupper | Thanks again, should I add another changeset to revert the oneway changes? | |
| 3 | 2017-05-13 05:54:02 UTC | BCNorwich | Hi, as you can see from the link the oneway tag is to be avoided unless it is needed to avoid other errors. It would actually do no harm if left. But best practice though would be to remove the oneway=no tags thus avoiding unnecessary bloat on the database. If you need any help please just ask. Re... | |