Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-04-24 14:19:37 UTCBCNorwich Hello, Just wanted to let you know that you've inadvertently placed "Way: Buildings (486821331)" on top of existing buildings, or something went wrong. Also that area way has self intersections to the outline. Regards
12017-04-24 05:53:33 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think you are mistaken with the guesthouse POI. Number 16 Hartley Ave is on the other side of the road and further north. Also I think East Ham (which is the area) is possibly not the proper name of the guest house.

Could you please rectify this problem? Tha...
12017-04-22 13:19:39 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've remove the turning circle from the grass area. Would you like to position it again please.
12017-04-22 07:33:45 UTCBCNorwich Made several amendments mainly to preserve/reinstate previous mapping.
12017-04-22 05:51:15 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Firstly your new node/POI for the Nisa Local is placed on the street, (not very precise). Also there is a Budgens shop mapped as the nearest building.
Has the Budgens store been replaced by Nisa? If so then it would be better to remove Budgens details and repla...
12017-04-21 19:49:41 UTCBCNorwich minor adjustments to conform
12017-04-21 06:03:55 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've taken the liberty to capitalise the names of the two areas you added.
I've have removed the residential area you added because it was a duplicated area,(the whole of Littleport is mapped as landuse=residential), so this area was residential within resident...
12017-04-19 15:21:38 UTCBCNorwich Removed sidewalk tag, sidewalk is a footway beside a highway.
12017-04-19 07:10:16 UTCBCNorwich Tagged area as retail, remove building tag.
12017-04-19 07:00:10 UTCBCNorwich Move common from joining to road, add pond to water feature, join path to road.
12017-04-18 17:51:42 UTCBCNorwich Hi, it would be good to tell folk what type of shop it is, grocery, art maybe even electrical?
22017-04-19 05:59:06 UTCMulanlaoshi Great suggestion. Thanks. This was my first experience of Open Street Maps....didn't think anyone would notice : )
32017-04-19 06:27:14 UTCBCNorwich Hi, no problem and thanks for considering the advice.
There's a lot of folk who would make mischief of something they can easily manipulate. Hence some OSMers glance at new folk editing and give advice when appropriate (or rectify mistakes). I've taken the liberty to amend your opening hours tag to...
12017-04-18 17:54:02 UTCBCNorwich Removed the duplicate postbox
12017-04-18 13:16:30 UTCBCNorwich Dallington Park is a recreation ground
12017-04-18 13:06:08 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Thanks for your addition to the OSM database. Unfortunately you were not aware that the original section of way could be separated and renamed. Placing a second way atop the original way inadvertently created a duplication of ways. I have separated that section o...
22017-04-18 14:42:16 UTCmdcambridge Many thanks! (I had only one thing to edit!), but there is more: Fowler Way actually extends to the left and parallels Dobson Way. It is also inaccessible like parts of Dobson Way due to construction. I will try to find the name of the road running roughly N/S that parallels pychard, which is also u...
12017-04-17 07:37:36 UTCBCNorwich Removed duplicate ways, amended lots of tags that did not properly describe the features, amended several area outlines, preserved previous mapping.
12017-04-16 17:33:21 UTCBCNorwich Removed water tag it's on the relation.
12017-04-16 14:13:00 UTCBCNorwich Hello There, can you say how you know this is a designated public footpath please. The way may well be used as a footpath but a "Designated Public Footpath" (Right of Way) carries a legal status which ought not be incorrectly stated. Regards
22017-04-16 14:14:49 UTCIt's Matthew The footpath signs are a good indication 😂
12017-04-15 15:28:37 UTCtomhukins Hi, thank you for improving OpenStreetMap. I notice you've added a "building=Lemonade_Building" tag to the Barclays branch. That's an unconventional value for the building tag: the commonly used values are listed at
22017-04-15 17:01:57 UTCBCNorwich Amended Barclays address
32017-04-15 18:26:21 UTCtomhukins BCNorwich, it looks like you've removed the building tag altogether. I expect this is because it exists on so I wonder if it makes sense to tag the address there. There's also which repeats the building's nam...
42017-04-15 18:58:57 UTCBCNorwich Hi, yes the building tag is there as building=apartments (18 levels), the bank is just one of those levels (level=0 is ground floor). The POI is needed if you want the building name to show in rendering (the building name in the banks tags is part of the address tagging, which is not rendered).
I t...
52017-04-15 19:02:36 UTCBCNorwich Second thoughts. The building name could go on the apartments outline as name=Lemonade Building which will be rendered. Thus the POI can be removed.
12017-04-15 17:08:35 UTCBCNorwich Hello Welcome to OSM.
If way 46858846 goes under or through building 416561610 the the section through the building should be a tunnel also wuth a layer tag. If you need help please just ask.
22017-04-18 08:59:50 UTCTom Shorey Hi BCNorwich, the building over hangs the way. Is that classed as a tunnel still?
12017-04-13 20:28:46 UTCchillly Welcome to OSM

Thanks for the detail.

May the Pokémon be with you!
22017-04-14 12:58:29 UTCBCNorwich But it's a recreation ground not a park!
32017-04-14 12:59:31 UTCchillly It doesn't look like a rec. There's no sports pitches laid out on it.
42017-04-14 13:37:01 UTCBCNorwich Hi, it's an area for informal recreation on foot, there do not have to be pitches.
52017-04-14 13:54:05 UTCchillly No, in English it is a piece of public land used for sports and games. The tagged space is a piece of rough ground that could not support sports and games. That may be a park, I suspect it is just grassland, it's certainly doesn't look well kept for a park.
12017-04-14 12:45:12 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I've reverted this area back to a college. Also remove the tag "park" from the college grounds.
12017-04-14 12:06:26 UTCBCNorwich Hello I've removed landuse=retail tag from the building as it is already on the outer land area outline.
12017-04-14 07:13:34 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This is a formal "playing field" so a recreation ground/area, there is no formal park here. Regards
12017-04-13 17:53:35 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Are these two points on the track really entrances to Nine Wells and are they really properly named as "Western entrance to Nine Wells LNR/LGS" and "Eastern entrance to Nine Wells LNR/LGS"?

In any case the OSM database cannot render informa...
12017-04-13 14:03:10 UTCchillly Welcome to OSM

Thanks for the detail

You seem to be a bit tangled in relations that you really don't need. Do you need any help sorting this out?
22017-04-13 14:07:23 UTCstujames Hi, how do you mean tangled? We can lose the point if it's overkill. I'm just trying to get my block onto as many maps as possible as it isn't showing up in various databases.
32017-04-13 14:12:41 UTCchillly I commented on the wrong changeset, but taking the four together: The last one looks fine, the first and third use a relation to draw two parts of the building that is not needed to be a relation. The building outline could be drawn in one piece then the names, address details etc added to the outli...
42017-04-13 14:13:32 UTCchillly sorry, *without* the separate point
52017-04-13 15:04:00 UTCBCNorwich Hello sorry if I've blundered in. I corrected Dixie Court from the first changeset before seeing these comments. Regards Bernard
12017-04-12 06:21:28 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think you have placed this node incorrectly. Guest house in middle of road, different street? Just ask if you need help. Regards
12017-04-11 15:26:22 UTCBCNorwich Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've placed your POI info on the already mapped outline of the park.
22017-04-11 15:29:48 UTCsimontaylor66 Thank you

Is there any way to get someone to change these? It's great that someone has updated the map to include the new development, but the orientation of the development is just slightly off. For Example Drury Avenue actually runs parallel to the busway, with Pychard Road still at 90 degree t...
32017-04-11 16:11:39 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I'm afraid that is about as good as can be expected for the time being, unless someone local does a proper survey of the area. There is as yet no aerial imagery that can be copied and there are no GPS tracks uploaded. If you can make a good plan I'd willingly trace it to OSM.
Regards Bernard
12017-04-11 05:43:30 UTCBCNorwich POI already mapped so removed this duplicate. Also added website.
12017-04-06 16:40:56 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've taken the liberty of adjusting the address, correcting the postcode O to 0, changing the format of the opening hours to suit OSM convention, adding a website. Hope that helps Regards Bernard
12017-04-06 07:21:37 UTCBCNorwich I made changes to your opening hours and expanded church St to saint
12017-04-04 07:11:54 UTCBCNorwich Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I amended your tags for name, opening-hours and description to conform to OSM best practice. Regards
12017-03-21 07:16:34 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You've placed this POI on the roadside by a little park, likely inadvertently incorrect. Features uploaded to OSM must be verifiable on the ground. It would be good if you could look at this positioning again. Or could you give more details of the florist, name,...
22017-04-04 06:06:48 UTCBCNorwich No response so POI is removed.
32017-04-04 09:35:32 UTCmapping man Hi BCNorwich. Just to let you know that there is a small public garden in that POI location. It is paved with an ornamental shrubbery in the centre and benches in a circular pattern on the outside. I think Jonathon must have used the wrong POI.
12017-04-03 16:58:25 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
With respect I have reverted your change-set as this area is predominantly trees thus woodland. Although the grass and wooded areas of the campus are used as recreation or parkland there is no formal park here, (with the exception of Earlham Park).
12017-04-03 07:16:48 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I've redrawn your grass areas that were over roads and self intersecting.
12017-03-29 16:57:31 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately you introduced a duplicate way with this addition by placing it atop the existing highway. I have removed the duplicate way
12017-03-28 13:46:25 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately you placed the new pedestrian highway on top of and along several trunk roads. Making in effect a duplicated way. Thus I have reverted (removed ) the new pedestrian way.

If it was your intention to mark up a map for running/walking then OSM is n...
12017-03-27 17:44:02 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This is a Public Right of Way please don't delete any of it. It may be inaccessible to vehicles, that does not matter.
22017-03-27 17:51:04 UTCEpping Forest Taxi Nobody is asking for it to be deleted, just for it to be marked as a pedestrian path; not normally accessible for vehicles.
32017-03-27 18:49:40 UTCBCNorwich OK, you had actually deleted the northern section, I now realise this must have been an inadvertent action which I've rectfied. The history of the change is still intact if you wish to view it.

12017-03-27 15:11:43 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A board walk needs to be tagged with bridge=boardwalk for it to be correctly represented. Please see :-

12017-03-27 15:10:13 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A board walk needs to be tagged with bridge=boardwalk for it to be correctly represented. Please see :-

12017-03-27 13:59:27 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've reversed the change to the hotel as the relation area was already in the database, (with the inner cutout (courtyard) of the building).
12017-03-26 05:44:10 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You have inadvertently placed your new space 'park' in the middle of a road which is obviously incorrect. I cannot see any place around here that could accommodate a new park so I've removed the POI.

If I can help in any way to locate the park please just as...
12017-03-23 07:03:59 UTCBCNorwich Hi, there are now several area named "Kidbrooke Village". I doubt if this large area is one apartment build, rather it could be several buildings. From the quoted website "Kidbrooke Village" is a name given to the whole area.
Regards Bernard
12017-03-23 06:53:52 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to point out a couple of things.
I wonder if "Sutcliffe Park Walkway" is a proper name given to all of the footpaths and if this is verifiable on the ground? (Please see :-
Secondly the...
12017-03-22 13:40:49 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've amended the opening hours tagging to suit that required by OSM, removed your description tag as that's really blatant advertising and is on your tagged website anyway.
That leaves the following two problems that you need to address :-

12017-03-22 07:22:28 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
So is that now a single building all with the address that was/is on the original part of the building? If so then the two building areas should be merged into one single area with the address. I could do this if you wish. Regards
12017-03-21 14:43:17 UTCBCNorwich Hi, if the road is closed that would not make its name Road Closed, so I've removed the name tag.
12017-03-21 07:33:33 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The info in the fire station POI you added is already contained on the amenity=fire_station area outline. I've removed the extraneous POI which no extra data.
12017-03-09 18:36:02 UTCBCNorwich Hello There, I think you have accidentally made a circle of Sandon Green park. If you need help altering it please just ask
22017-03-20 08:23:45 UTCBCNorwich No response so I've adjusted park outline to bing.
12017-03-14 20:49:42 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately an addition in this manner is of no use to anyone including yourself, it just won't show on any map. If you draw your house outline, tag it as building=house (maybe add the address) that will be able to be rendered on a map. Otherwise this node ough...
22017-03-14 23:36:18 UTCTerry Stapleton I'm new to this please delete node asap
32017-03-15 06:51:34 UTCBCNorwich Hi thanks for responding, the node is deleted.
Please just ask if you want any help.
12017-03-14 07:21:02 UTCBCNorwich Removed fiction
12017-03-14 07:09:56 UTCBCNorwich More details and better positioning would help.
12017-03-14 06:58:03 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted your changeset because all the tourism=attraction features you added are already mapped, (the tags are on the actual features). By the way you had made several spelling and capitalisation mistakes.
12017-03-12 07:18:14 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Our aim is the best map possible, we strive to help new mappers understand best practices learnt from years of experience. Please take these comments as trying to help not hinder.

In deleting the park and drawing it again you have removed the mapping history o...
12017-03-11 13:52:39 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The land this building is on already has a landuse=residential tag therefore the building does not need a landuse tag at all. I have changed the building tag from building=yes to building=residential. If/when the building is mapped as separate dwellings each can ...
22017-03-11 15:14:35 UTCQafir Thank you. I'll keep this in mind for all further edits.
12017-03-11 08:41:52 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Features mapped to OSM must be verifiable on the ground (the whole idea of a map is to guide one to a place/feature on the ground).
I cannot ascertain a proper address for your company, (it is not in the middle of Barbel Street), so I have removed the POI.
If ...
12017-03-10 14:50:01 UTCBCNorwich This is a park, your fiction is removed. Please don't mess up a live worldwide map. It spoils it for everyone including yourself. Thanks!
12017-03-10 14:45:24 UTCBCNorwich Are you sure that is a hotel, or is it just a room rental??
22017-03-10 15:13:39 UTCtrigpoint Airbnb are private homes and have no place in OSM, I am reverting this
12017-03-10 14:23:56 UTCBCNorwich I tagged it as building=house now it will show.
12017-03-10 07:45:19 UTCBCNorwich Dubious name removed and pool outline corrected.
12017-03-10 07:43:28 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed the fiction name. Is this really in your front garden or down the road a bit?
12017-03-10 07:35:32 UTCBCNorwich Hello could you give an indication as to the memorial dedication please? Is it for the Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Hospital? If so the site of the hospital building is on the corner of Church Way and Euston Road and maybe the POI is not exactly placed.
12017-03-10 07:20:01 UTCBCNorwich Info on these nodes already exists on the park area outlines. So nodes removed as its unnecessary duplication.
12017-03-10 07:18:36 UTCBCNorwich Info on this node already exists on the park area outline. So node removed as its unnecessary duplication.
12017-03-10 07:16:21 UTCBCNorwich Info for park name placed on already mapped park outline area.
12017-03-10 07:09:50 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have removed your new POI for the church as the church is already mapped in its correct location south of here. Regards
12017-03-09 18:49:02 UTCBCNorwich Hello, The Horse & Groom POI was close by, I've properly positioned it.
The area you mapped you tagged as a lake and it was a circle shape, obviously incorrect so I've removed it. If you need help please just ask.
12017-03-09 18:39:45 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I've positioned the church POI to over the church building according to the Bing image. Regards
12017-03-09 18:26:18 UTCBCNorwich The park was already mapped, I've added your new surface tag (grass) to the existing feature. Regards
12017-03-09 18:20:25 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted your changeset because it joined up service roads, an existing area and a new area into (linking linear and area features into one feature).
If you can explain what you are trying to do maybe I could help?
12017-03-09 18:03:12 UTCBCNorwich Hello, your restaurant was wrongly placed. I've put a POI with your data at roughly 62 Marine Parade and reinstated the crossing that was altered at your original position. Regards
12017-02-20 14:21:49 UTCBCNorwich The park you have added is over a residential area. If the park is fictitious then it should be removed, (only on the ground verifiable features ought be added to OSM). If it is fiction would you therefore please remove it? Or shall I remove it?
22017-03-07 08:21:56 UTCBCNorwich No response so park mapped on top of housing is removed.
12017-03-07 08:07:25 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to let you know that in the absence of a oneway tag OSM presumes that the is way is twoway, thus under most circumstances there not a need to tag oneway=no OSM presumes it for you.

Having said that your tagging is not in fact incorrect, just unne...
12017-02-18 16:55:51 UTCchillly Welcome to OSM

I'm not really sure what you were trying to do here. You have created an area, given it a name that looks like a road name and added something that looks like a postcode that can't apply to the whole area.

I wonder if you were experimenting and didn't mean to save this to the li...
22017-03-04 17:15:57 UTCBCNorwich No response so fiction removed.
12017-02-18 08:00:19 UTCBCNorwich This feature House of Abderahman is in the garden behind Foulden Road. There is not to my knowledge a hotel on Foulden Road. I suspect this is probably where you or your friend resides. You could map the house where you live, that would be OK. But this fiction should be removed.
22017-03-02 07:13:48 UTCBCNorwich Fiction removed
12017-02-18 07:53:31 UTCBCNorwich This feature House of Yousef is not placed on Jade Close. There is not to my knowledge a hotel on either Jade Close nor Marble Drive. I suspect this is probably where you reside. You could map the house where you live, that would be OK. But this fiction should be removed.
22017-03-02 07:12:50 UTCBCNorwich I have removed the fiction.
12017-03-01 18:13:10 UTCBCNorwich Hello, Just wanted to let you know that a section of Sandy Park Road (amended/altered in this your recent changeset) is now duplicated. There are different route relations on each part of the duplication so it needs knowledge of these to make a repair.
12017-03-01 10:27:51 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap, your fictions have been removed. Please be aware that your uploads are spoiling the best map in the world. That means you are spoiling it for yourself as well.
You've shown you are a good mapper so genuine additions to OSM will be appreciated.
12017-02-27 11:42:15 UTCDerick Rethans Hi!

And welcome to OpenStreetMap. I think you might have double drawn the road now. Would you like me to correct this? What was your intention with this change? did the road change?

22017-02-27 14:53:23 UTCBCNorwich Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've actually added 4 new untagged ways each duplicating the route of Grierson Road. So I have reverted this changeset to avoid any problems of someone trying to undo mistakes.
12017-02-26 08:46:46 UTCBCNorwich Hell, I removed way 453122534 as it duplicates part of way 476898369, it also had self intersection of the outline.
12017-02-26 06:50:34 UTCBCNorwich Hello There, and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I removed your tag lanes=-2 from Hampden Way as it is meaning less, (-2 lanes is less than 1 lane, less than 1 lane is no road at all).
12017-02-25 07:59:32 UTCBCNorwich Hello, I noticed you changed the name of this bus stop. This POI is a bus stop not a telephone box.
If your intention is to map a defibrillator then you have not done so. The phone box is not mapped, please add it as a separate POI. If it is now defibrillator position please properly map it as such...
12017-02-23 07:37:01 UTCBCNorwich Hi, hasn't the pub now been demolished, (as reported on some websites)?
22017-02-23 10:26:35 UTCChrisBarr Ah, yes you're right. Should the building be deleted? (Sorry, first time contributor to OSM)
32017-02-23 12:47:08 UTCBCNorwich Hi, no problem. welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've added a demolished:amenity=pub tag removed the other tags but kept your note. Like this anyone thinking the pub has been accidentally deleted can see the shape and reason for removal of the amenity. When the new construction is done perhaps you could...
42017-02-23 12:52:12 UTCChrisBarr I see, that makes sense. Yes will do. Thanks!
12017-02-21 22:15:00 UTCtrigpoint Hi, welcome to osm. Something has gone a little wrong here, the building you have created is rather large and covers several streets. Would you like some help fixing it?
22017-02-22 07:39:15 UTCBCNorwich Hello yes welcome.
Your next changeset made incorrect alterations so I've reverted both changeset as both have problems.
I researched your company and have added a POI at the building mapped as 46 Loman Street. Please check this out and adjust as necessary.
12017-02-22 07:14:36 UTCBCNorwich Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted your addition of an un-described area as it makes major alterations to mapped rail lines dragging them out of place.
There are many help pages to get you started mapping. If you need help adding features to OSM please just ask.
12017-02-21 13:53:18 UTCBCNorwich Does this site exist? I can find no reference to it!
12017-02-20 14:09:35 UTCBCNorwich Hello There,
You've mapped the park over two buildings. Have the buildings been demolished? If so the buildings should be removed or tagged as demolished.
12017-02-20 06:56:22 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have removed your POI as it is already mapped. I have added your tourism=attraction tag to the existing POI as it was missing and may have led to your addition.
Regards Bernard
12017-02-18 09:22:59 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I wonder if the guest house is really called "HOME" and if it is actually situated on the corner of a street. Could you please better place the POI and possibly correct the name?
12017-02-16 07:26:16 UTCBCNorwich Hello There,
I reverted the name change from your destination/origin information because Lea Valley Lines is the name not Enfield - Liverpool Street Line.
The destination and origin information is already contained in the route relation.
Regards Bernard
12017-02-15 19:16:16 UTCBCNorwich Revert Fiction
12017-02-15 19:14:02 UTCBCNorwich Reverted fiction
12017-02-15 07:33:28 UTCBCNorwich Hello There, i think something went wrong with Jennings Pool by the looks of it. Can I help? Can it be removed?
regards Bernard
12017-02-14 14:27:35 UTCBCNorwich Inadvertent un-tagged mapping removed. Added back wood area to your park, the area can have two or more descriptive tags.
12017-02-14 12:59:01 UTCBCNorwich Hello, you haven't actually deleted the building or park, you've just removed some tags to them.
12017-02-14 07:23:04 UTCBCNorwich Hello There,
As the areas are mapped the name Perivale Wood Local Nature Reserve appears three times on three areas. Do you think that, as the two meadows are mapped as within the Perivale Wood Local Nature Reserve, they might just have their individual meadow names. Thus avoiding repetition.
12017-02-14 06:59:08 UTCBCNorwich Hello and thanks for joining the two paths. I had alerted the new mapper to the problem with a comment on his changeset ( He responded but due to your quick correction was not able to see un-joined ways.
If you notice a newb...
12017-02-13 07:19:11 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The two footways are not joined to each other. Could you verify or not that there is a continuous way through on the footpath from Gas Hill to St Leonard's Road? If so then the two paths should be joined.
Regards Bernard
22017-02-13 22:47:21 UTCAndy South Thankyou Bernard, Yes there is a continuous way through. I just looked on the map and it seemed to me that the lines for St Leonards and St Michaels terraces are joined. But I'm new to this so please do correct if not. Thanks. Andy
32017-02-14 06:49:16 UTCBCNorwich Hello Andy, The problem was fixed yesterday by mapper dmgroom_ct so you were unable to see the un-joined ways.

No problem now and thanks for your additions. If I can help in any way please just ask.
Regards Bernard
12017-02-09 08:19:31 UTCBCNorwich Hello, I just wanted to let you know that you are, probably inadvertently, making a lot of self intersection on the various types of areas you map.
22017-02-09 08:24:17 UTCBCNorwich Also a field or fields tagged show the land usage is better described as landuse=farmland.

To tag an area landuse=farm is really describing the area as a place (a farm in OSM is usually a place).
32017-02-12 16:52:14 UTCSK53 @BCNorwich: this latter statement is incorrect. landuse=farm predates use of landuse=farmland but got used for farmyards. It was therefore decided that a clearer distinction was needed, hence farmland and farmyard. place=farm is something different and should largely be avoided in most parts of Brit...
42017-02-12 18:43:45 UTCDyserth Hi BCNorwich - I'm not sure what you mean by self intersection but I presume its where a way goes back on itself. I have no idea how you can find out which ways have this error either so am unable to check and correct them. As you can find them have you any hints?
Some areas around this region had ...
52017-02-12 18:57:51 UTCSK53 Hi Dyserth,

This tool is a good place to start (I've selected only the intersecting polygon option & pointed it N Wales):

I wrote something about these issues a long time ago, but it might still be useful as an ...
62017-02-12 19:11:35 UTCBCNorwich
Hello Dyserth, the above link show the geometry layer of problems in OSM mapping including area intersecting points. There are several views that can be selected giving many layers of differing problems.
Yes self intersections are where an area outline doubles back on i...
12017-02-09 14:20:13 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. IMHO one ought not to assume speed limits, it's really just guessing. Would it be possible to go there and properly survey the roads.
22017-02-09 14:27:56 UTCBCNorwich Oh and the foot-way, are cycles allowed there? Also the foot-way is not joined to the roads at each end so software will not be able to route along it.
32017-02-09 19:15:50 UTCmarkf0wle I live on this road. The speed limit isn't sign posted on the estate, my assumption was my interpretation of the highway code. I will double check & correct if nessecary.

I will amend the footpath. Yes, bicycles are permitted on all the footpaths in the area to my knowledge.
42017-02-11 15:53:48 UTCtrigpoint You have tagged Welling Road as lanes=1, is that true? It doesn't look like a single track road on bing imagery.
Also 20mph areas cannot exist without signs.
52017-02-11 22:57:23 UTCmarkf0wle OK, good shout. I have corrected the lanes on Welling Rd, is 2 lanes - 1 in each direction.

I have too found this reviewing the highway code, therefore the official speed limit would be 30mph as that is the last posted speed as you enter Welling Road from Brentwood Road.
62017-02-12 07:14:37 UTCBCNorwich Would you then correct the speed limits on the estate please?
It would be wrong for OSM, (the best map in the world), to knowingly contain wrong data.
72017-02-12 13:01:45 UTCmarkf0wle Done Sir.
12017-02-11 16:42:11 UTCBCNorwich Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I really don't know how you came to map your POI so far away from Raleigh. You actually changed the address of a building mapped in Dagenham, London, UK.
I have reverted the change so no harm is done here. If I can help in any way please just ask. Good luc...
12017-02-10 17:15:43 UTCBCNorwich Pointless POI from maps me removed
12017-02-10 13:55:27 UTCBCNorwich Hello Dreamer. This POI "Buckingham Palace" is actually along way from the Palace.
The Palace is already tagged as tourism so no extra tag is needed there, would you please then remove inadvertent POI?

Your POI "Greenwich" is not needed either as the place is already mapped, ...
22017-02-10 17:06:19 UTCtrigpoint Hi Brian, I have reverted both of these changsets, users are very unlikely to respond and is not capable of changing or removing anything.
12017-02-10 13:48:42 UTCBCNorwich Hello Dreamer. This POI "Westminster Abbey" is actually along way from the Abbey.
The Abbey is already tagged as tourism so no extra tag is needed there, would you please then remove inadvertent POI?
12017-02-09 10:20:48 UTCSomeoneElse Hi Bernard,

Did you even look at the underlying features that you made changes to here?

The way that you have edited started out as a wood (see ) and was changed to a duplicate park by a Pokemon mapper in https:...
22017-02-09 11:37:57 UTCBCNorwich I have reverted the changeset. My apologies for not having any idea what you were doing.
12017-02-09 07:26:45 UTCBCNorwich Hello There, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It is the usual practice, if a building is single occupancy (serves a single purpose/company), to place the address information on the building outline. This practice can be seen/noted in several of the nearby mapped buildings.

I see you've done several te...
22017-02-09 09:44:59 UTCFreddyMills Hi, yeah sorry about this basically I'm trying to use MapBox to do geocoding requests on points I add via the OSM API, but they don't seem to appear immediately in their maps. I was just leaving a point somewhere I thought wouldn't cause problems overnight to see how long it takes them to pick up ne...
12017-02-07 19:38:05 UTCBCNorwich Reverted you additions as they duplicated themselves, duplicated existing mapped ways and were drawn across houses.
Please just ask if you need help adding something to OpenStreetMap. We're always willing to help new mappers improve the live worldwide map rather than corrupt it.
12017-02-05 18:33:13 UTCDaveF Why have you deleted the building?
22017-02-05 18:42:16 UTCBCNorwich I beg your pardon my mistake. There was a duplicate node on the entrance. When I inspected it I saw the two outlines and deleted one of them. After your prompt and closer inspection I found the duplicate node.
Building now restored and extra node removed.
32017-02-05 18:45:50 UTCDaveF Thanks
12017-02-03 19:53:33 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your change of the two bus stop names is incorrect but understandable. The names are taken from the National Public Transport Access Node (NaPTAN) database. These names are the official designated names and are not necessarily what local folk might call the bus s...
22017-02-04 10:02:24 UTCA1map OK Bernard, understood. Thanks for letting me know.
Regards Martin
12017-02-01 17:38:51 UTCBCNorwich You are very welcome to add features to OpenStreetMap but they must be genuine. Anything else is looked on as vandalism and would be to your detriment should you ever have need to use an OSM map.
Your obvious fiction has been removed.
12017-02-01 14:03:40 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I noticed you've had several attempts at placing feature on the map. This has resulted in one untagged node being uploaded to the OSM database. As it is this has no value and should be removed.
If you would like help mapping something please just ask, otherwise...
12017-02-01 07:54:59 UTCBCNorwich Removed duplicate paths, removed path names, minor adjustments
12017-01-31 20:51:29 UTCtrigpoint Hi, welcome to OSM.
We try to map things accurately as they exist in the real world
This and many of your other additions appear to be doodles, this one is on top of a road.
22017-02-01 07:38:33 UTCBCNorwich Removed duplicated way.
12017-02-01 07:27:52 UTCBCNorwich Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Please take time to understand the best way to properly add paths to OSM. I've looked at all in this changeset and lots are duplication's, others illogical. In order to protect the integrity of the map, (used by folk all over the world) I've removed some obviously w...
12017-01-31 07:37:33 UTCBCNorwich Hi, thanks for adding these two POI but the information was already placed on the buildings. Duplicate POI info removed.
12017-01-29 17:15:23 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I've removed the three parks because they are mapped within an existing park. Regards
12017-01-29 17:03:34 UTCBCNorwich Hi, the area tagged as wood is an area within the area tagged as park. Your change tagged the woods to park within a park. I've changed the tagging back to the original.
12017-01-29 08:05:06 UTCBCNorwich Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
"Name=resident area" on a node does not mean anything to the database. If you want to indicate that the building is residential within that predominately retail area then you could change the tag building=yes to building=residential.
Need any help please ...
12017-01-29 07:23:21 UTCBCNorwich Hi the park you added was obviously a mistake as it was placed on top of a residential area, so I've removed it. Regards
12017-01-28 15:16:15 UTCchillly Welcome to OSM

You have changed something named as Compton Terrace Gardens from being tagged as a garden to a park. Is this really true, or are you changing things to attract Pokémon? We want your edits but please add real stuff in the right place and described properly.
22017-01-28 15:24:28 UTCRomulus_Tiberius I don't play pokemon. But English is also not my first language, and after just googling the difference between park and garden I tend to think that is more of a park then a garden. There's nowhere near enough plants or flowering plants to make it a garden, but at the same time maybe it's not big en...
32017-01-28 15:27:18 UTCchillly OK, I accept your choice. We are seeing lots of new mappers simply adding parks to play a game, that's why I asked.

I hope you find more detail to add in your area.
42017-01-28 17:54:37 UTCBCNorwich Hello Compton Terrace Gardens are actually gardens, they happen to be used like a park. That's why they are called and signed as gardens. Originally they were for the private use of people living in the terrace's, please see :-
12017-01-28 07:50:55 UTCBCNorwich Welcome to OpenStreetMap a live worldwide database that ordinary folk contribute to in order to make the best maps possible. Please don't add fiction for your games to the live map. There are ways that you can use OSM to make maps of your desire but what you've done here is incorrect. Thus your addi...
12017-01-28 07:50:29 UTCBCNorwich Welcome to OpenStreetMap a live worldwide database that ordinary folk contribute to in order to make the best maps possible. Please don't add fiction for your games to the live map. There are ways that you can use OSM to make maps of your desire but what you've done here is incorrect. Thus your addi...
12017-01-28 07:36:30 UTCBCNorwich Adjustments to area, add/amend service and foot access, remove unnecessary tags, remove POI
12017-01-27 08:07:19 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This footway is already mapped in that the existing cycleway is designated as segregated foot and cycle use. So I have removed the duplication.
Regards Bernard
22017-01-27 17:45:57 UTCmjs317 Thank you Bernard. Put that down to over exuberance of a new user!
32017-01-28 07:02:20 UTCBCNorwich No problem, need any help just ask!
12017-01-27 18:10:02 UTCtrigpoint Hi, welcome to OSM. I assume this footpath is meant to connect to Wellbeck Drive? For it to be usable it does need to connect. Shout up if you need a hand.
22017-01-27 19:20:13 UTCBCNorwich I don't think there is a footpath goes through the houses just there.
12017-01-27 18:46:52 UTCBCNorwich All change-sets to and including this one are reverted to remove fiction.
12017-01-27 18:26:47 UTCBCNorwich Not the proper place to do testing (testing can be done without uploading fiction to the live database). Can I help you with mapping anything.
Your addition has been removed.
12017-01-27 18:22:44 UTCBCNorwich Your silly fiction has been removed. If you need help adding genuine features to OSM please just ask.
12017-01-27 12:57:20 UTCBCNorwich Removed residential area as it was mapped inside of a residential area, duplication.
12017-01-27 12:52:25 UTCBCNorwich Removed paths drawn over established housing.
12017-01-27 08:39:30 UTCBCNorwich I have reverted these silly changes.
You show you have a good idea how to map map properly, this is the best map in the world please don't spoil it. And we would welcome some real additions to help us and your good self
12017-01-27 08:32:16 UTCBCNorwich It's an informal path through the woods not a of the status you tagged it. The house is not a park. The gardens are not a park. Tagging reversed/removed.
12017-01-27 08:20:02 UTCBCNorwich This is actually a service road maintained by the council. Giving vehicle access to properties along it as well as access on foot.
12017-01-26 14:29:34 UTCchillly Welcome to OSM.

You seem to have deleted stuff and and added junk to the map. If you are trying to attract Pokémon, you are wasting your time. They only use certified parks, paths and waterways.Imaginary ones are a waste of time.

I will delete this as junk.
22017-01-26 14:39:00 UTCjm350z I accidentally deleted the funeral home. As far as junk is concerned, i tried to add waveney water garden, this was a japanese garden with many koi ponds created by my late father in law. There are still original ponds and fish at the properties. Your reference to junk is very harsh and quite frankl...
32017-01-26 14:41:38 UTCchillly Hmmm, what about the five houses on a private road you plonked the pond onto?

I stand by junk.
42017-01-26 14:44:08 UTCjm350z "ponds" at the properties. Go fuck yourself
52017-01-26 14:49:38 UTClostmike Map each pond separately.
62017-01-26 14:53:29 UTCchillly Thank you for reinforcing my initial idea. I have checked, the area covered all of the houses and gardens and even touched the main road. Maybe there were ponds there in years past, but the aerial images show only houses and gardens with lawns now.

If you want to map real stuff that is present n...
72017-01-26 19:21:30 UTCBCNorwich Supporting chilly's decision and calm response.
12017-01-24 21:49:49 UTCchillly Welcome to OSM

Is that really a park or are you just trying to attract Pokémon? The park (garden) overlaps the building. please add stuff carefully and only add real stuff.
22017-01-25 14:37:15 UTCBCNorwich Removed fictional park placed atop existing buildings and private parking area.
12017-01-25 14:35:51 UTCBCNorwich Removed fictional park placed atop existing buildings.
12017-01-25 14:33:37 UTCBCNorwich Adding made up places is not very helpful to a live worldwide database. Your changes are reverted.
Even so Welcome to OpenStreetMap and if I can help you make a positive contribution please just ask.
Regards Bernard
12017-01-25 10:05:34 UTCBCNorwich With respect I think you will find that under the tree cover is a large area of water. If you haven't actually been there then please look at other maps and aerial imagery.
Regards Bernard
22017-01-25 10:24:49 UTCteebox Dear Bernard,

Thank you for your comment. I do in fact live in Long Melford and frequent the Valley Trail and park regularly. Whilst I agree that there is a large body of water in the woodland area, i believe the proportions both on OSM and Google maps are inaccurate. It appears substantially lar...
12017-01-24 19:54:24 UTCBCNorwich Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This area is actually part of Clapham Common and has been mapped as such for many years.
12017-01-24 12:41:04 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The information contained on your two added POI (museum) is already included in full description's of each of the buildings. I have removed your two POI as it is a duplication of data.
12017-01-23 08:44:33 UTCBCNorwich Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You've placed that unnamed bank on a residential street. I don't think there's a bank close by so I'll remove the POI.
If you can give more details and a better position please please make the addition and if I can help please just ask.
12017-01-23 07:34:00 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've adjusted your new mapped path (separated it from the wood area outline), joined it to the crossing ways and extended it west a little to join a track (seen in the Bing image).
The width measurement used in OSM is metric, did you really mean the path is 10 m...
22017-01-23 19:29:20 UTCWorldsBoss Thank you for the kind welcome Bernard. I did notice that the measurement was in meters, but there was method in my madness haha. Although the main footpath is on the top half of the clearing where I drew the footpath, it does technically span the entire clearing. There is grass everywhere else unti...
12017-01-22 15:01:39 UTCBCNorwich Made several adjustments to paths, joined several to roads.
12017-01-22 14:36:50 UTCBCNorwich Joined several ways to roads. made many adjustments to paths.
12017-01-22 08:55:59 UTCBCNorwich Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've had a close look at the ways you've recently added to the database.
I removed several bridleways as they were duplication's of existing ways and are not bridleways in their own right. I re-tagged highways where appropriate to include bridle status. I joined up an...
22017-01-22 09:00:25 UTCBCNorwich Way: 467433785 can you really walk that line and does it join the road at north?
32017-01-22 20:58:02 UTCtelmocosta Yes you can walk 467433785 and it joins the road at north. although i haven't crossed that path yet. Thanks for your help, I have laid down plenty of path for my walk, I am not experienced in drawing footpaths.
12017-01-06 15:35:57 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
There are problems with this footpath. You've not connected it to the road at south, it's drawn across a house into back gardens. Would you please look at and correct it? Need any help just ask. I can remove it for you if it's not repairable?
22017-01-22 08:11:51 UTCBCNorwich No response, no evidence so removed way.
12017-01-06 15:27:31 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Well I'm sorry to say that addition has gone wrong. The footpath in part duplicates Mercator Road, then cuts twice across a building. Would you like to have a look and make corrections? If you need help please just ask, I'll await your response. If no response I'...
22017-01-22 08:09:48 UTCBCNorwich No response so path removed. There are several footpaths around these buildings that could be added but a proper survey is needed.
12017-01-19 19:10:40 UTCBCNorwich removed fiction
12017-01-19 18:55:20 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This hotel just doesn't look right. Unnamed and sitting in the middle of a street. Can you give more details and position please. If I can help please just ask.
22017-01-23 06:37:50 UTCSDavies I think I do recall seeing a hotel near here-- but at the Chingford Rd end of the street. I'll likely survey this area soon-ish so will check then.
12017-01-14 14:34:34 UTCBCNorwich Hello there Sam888.
Quite a few problems with the features you recently added. Would you like to have a look and maybe make adjustments, please see here :-,self_intersecti...
22017-01-18 18:25:25 UTCBCNorwich Two areas tagged as grass that are actually 90, 95% not grass but highway surface, are removed. Grass area was a narrow verge. Each area was also mapped with self intersection.

One area remapped to remove self intersection of area outline, create areas without any self intersection, now mapped pr...
32017-01-20 00:33:29 UTCSomeoneElse Based on the last time I was in the area (last year) I don't think there's anything like this amount of "meadow" here. You could maybe make a claim for the bit by the cricket pitch, but it'd be a stretch.
42017-02-09 23:50:00 UTCSomeoneElse This was so wrong based on my recollection of the area that I've reverted it (but also tried to incorporate future changes that seemed plausible, e.g. that the main street in Milton is lit).
12017-01-03 08:08:26 UTCBCNorwich There are still many problems with your mapping. Now I see gates mapped as linear features. A gate is an impediment/barrier to a way, not a way it's self. The tag barrier=gate should be placed on a single node of either a barrier or highway, or an intersection of a barrier and a highway, please see ...
22017-01-17 12:16:02 UTCBCNorwich Problems now rectified
12017-01-01 18:14:28 UTCchillly Hi,
If the area around a property is a garden, you can (should) tag it as a garden, not a meadow. The key is leisure:garden.

Only add names that are shown on signs, so a garden will not have a name:Garden tag. It takes a while to get the hang of things, but you're getting there.
22017-01-01 18:20:59 UTCchillly There is landuse:orchard available if you're sure the site is an orchard, again that stops you misusing the name tag.
32017-01-17 08:58:32 UTCBCNorwich All problems now rectified.
12017-01-01 10:54:01 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
OSM is a live worldwide database from which folk compile maps. It is imperative that the data we add is correct, factual and verifiable on the ground.
You show good skills in adding features to the database. But with the exception of the two buildings it looks l...
22017-01-17 08:40:23 UTCBCNorwich I think all problems on this changeset now rectified, thanks
12017-01-16 08:27:57 UTCBCNorwich The number suggests a triangulation pillar then type=triangulation can be added. Please see here :-
22017-01-16 09:38:36 UTCPeter Fowler Sure.

I am very, very new here, and I read the paragraph,

> type=triangulation,
> type=observation_spot,
> type=fixed_point and type=benchmark
> have meaning in nautical maps, where
> they refer to INT-1 codes B20, B21, B22
> and B23 respectively. Note: it would be \...
32017-01-16 11:34:30 UTCSomeoneElse "type=triangulation" was a new one to me too...
42017-01-17 13:34:52 UTCSK53 type=* anything should be avoided as type really should be reserved for relations. I would agree with either of survey_point or survey_point:type as being suitable values.
52017-01-19 07:02:05 UTCPeter Fowler Please believe me that I had no notion how difficult I would find this. Please feel invited to fill in the correct tags perhaps from . Further, I am not quite certain that the [wiki page that I used]( is...
62017-01-19 07:18:08 UTCPeter Fowler I have found, on my shelves, a paper copy of sheet 122 of the Seventh Series (Melton Mowbray) published 1962. Looking at SK865065, it is between the 500 foot and 450 foot contour line, I would judge at about 470 feet, maybe a little higher. Should I add this figure, or the one from the Garmin (149 m...
72017-01-19 11:44:04 UTCSK53 Not to worry: somewhat surprisingly trig pillars are not that well documented. This discussion is useful for helping clarify what should be documented. By a remarkable co-incidence last weekend I also mapped a trig pillar featured on sheet 122 (, so it's ...
82017-01-20 03:39:27 UTCPeter Fowler OK. My map does not appear to have the spot height. The green Pathfinder 896 has metric contours and a spot height of 150 and the Orange Explorer 15 is identical. My only concern is to avoid being accused of wrongful copying of the issued data from [TrigpointingUK]( ...
92017-01-20 11:16:22 UTCSK53 My map is issue B/* (c) 1962, updated with PRoW and major roads 1967. I notice the map on NLS doesnt have the spot height either, and the earlier interpolated contours on the 6" and 2.5 inch OOC maps dont really agree with the spot height (
102017-02-26 12:47:48 UTCPeter Fowler Thank you.

I have never previously seen that map, and I agree that the land rises quite steeply from the Uppingham Road. This triangulation pillar does not seem to be shown. Had it been erected? The OS claim that their "leveling" dates from 1963. Perhaps the contour lines on the 1937-61...
12017-01-16 08:02:50 UTCBCNorwich I'm sorry but I don't think that the playing field nor the football pitch is named "Briston pavillion". The clubhouse building east of the field might be.
22017-01-16 08:08:41 UTCBCNorwich Please don't let the comments on your first OSM mapping deter you, everyone makes mistakes (especially me). There is a lot to learn and there's lots of help on the web. If you think I can help please just ask.
12017-01-15 21:36:23 UTCchillly Welcome to OSM,

Thanks for the detail. We normally add a name tag when there is a sign naming something. Public Footpath is a useful sign but we add a special tag designation=public_footpath.
22017-01-16 07:53:04 UTCBCNorwich Yes Welcome, what you've actually added is a duplication of an existing way. It's been on the OSM database for several years and is on the Vespucci map. As such it adds nothing extra to the database (except for several of your new descriptions, which I might argue about), thus it ought to be removed...
12017-01-15 12:20:54 UTCBCNorwich This bus-stop is mapped actually some distance from the street and there is another bus-stop close by on that street. The name=studio given to the bus_stop looks suspicious as well, especially as the close by building is Studio College.
So it looks like your mapping is somewhat flawed.
Please re...
12017-01-14 21:13:18 UTCchillly Hi Welcome to OSM,
You seem to have added a footpath which meanders across a roundabout and a road. Did you mean to save this for everyone to see of were you practicing? Do you need any help with this?
22017-01-15 12:07:21 UTCBCNorwich Yes welcome, I started to rectify the problems on some of the sections of path modified/added at the north of this changeset. Unfortunately I think the rest is better/easier if removed and started again. Then as they are pavements by the road separated by a kerb it could be better to map them as sid...
12017-01-11 18:56:07 UTCBCNorwich Is there a physical, verifiable feature on the ground here with a verifiable name? If not then the point ought not be mapped as it serves no function. Please see :-
22017-01-14 19:33:36 UTChadw The other issue here is that names should not be used to carry meta-data.
32017-01-15 09:31:56 UTCBCNorwich No response from mapper so changeset reverted.
12017-01-14 10:09:21 UTCBCNorwich Hello There, OpenStreetMap is a live worldwide database from which folk compile maps. To include fiction in this database could cause disruption. You added a name to a residential area which looks highly suspicious so I have reverted the changes.
If you can show the name is verifiable on the ground...
22017-01-14 10:12:27 UTCBCNorwich WARNING the link to GoaLoo may not be safe.
12017-01-13 20:39:49 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This building is named Belmont, you've added the name "Unique Best Man Speeches" to the building which is clearly wrong. Unique Best Man Speeches is at best a company or office within the building. If it has a physical presence at all. A POI for the com...
22017-01-13 20:42:38 UTCBCNorwich I just noticed the statement on your website "We will not spam you" OK
12017-01-13 19:20:26 UTCtrigpoint Hi Bernard, you have missed sport=soccor

Cheers Phil
22017-01-13 20:14:06 UTCBCNorwich Hello Phil,

No I didn't miss it, I left it for you, please see my comment here :-, just joking. It will always be football to me! What do you think, conform or not?

Regards Bernard
12017-01-13 18:12:23 UTCBCNorwich Hello this area is the pitch. The stadium is the already mapped building to the east. I've changed the tag back to pitch.
I would agree with the sport=football tag, and would use it myself, after all it is a football club. There is however a trend to call this game soccer. Regards
12017-01-13 18:01:18 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Could you say why you placed the POI (sculpture) in the residential relation number 2919365, as I can see no need to do this. If this was inadvertent shall I remove it from the relation (it only bloats the database). Regards.
12017-01-12 18:15:38 UTCBCNorwich Hello there, your mapping of the three fields is very imprecise as to be almost valueless. Could you please make good these areas, you can zoom right in so as to very accurately map field boundary's.
12017-01-12 07:13:39 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Could you have a look at your new way 465160584 (highway=unclassified), it isn't joined to the A4178 at the eastern end. Logic would suggest it should be. Regards Bernard
22017-01-12 11:33:25 UTCBiggles500 Sorry, new to this game :)
Hopefully I've now managed to join the dots up.
12017-01-11 07:14:37 UTCBCNorwich Hi, is the phone shop actually in the Jewish community centre?
12016-12-23 12:46:43 UTClostmike Welcome to OSM

You appear to have created a park, a footpath and a lake where there was once houses and gardens. Is this accidental or have these gardens been demolished for the purpose?
22016-12-24 07:29:55 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The OSM database is a live worldwide operation from which folk compile maps for you and I to use. So it's not a good thing to place fiction here. There are sites where you can make up your own fantasy maps but this is not one of them.
I can find no official evid...
32017-01-10 10:59:19 UTCBCNorwich No response from StarsMmd so reverted as could find no evidence in favour of the edit.
12017-01-09 11:25:51 UTCchillly You have added what looks like advertising to a road junction. OSM is not Google maps, we don't host adverts. If your business is nearby (it won't be in the middle of a junction) you can add it as, say, an office.

If you just wanted to add an advert you need to go elsewhere.

I intend to remo...
22017-01-10 07:58:58 UTCBCNorwich Hello, the tagging to this node can be removed as the information is mapped more fully at 173 Colney Hatch Lane to the north. This here is a duplication of part of the company information.
ref :-
12017-01-10 07:32:26 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Thanks for you additions to the OSM database. Can I please draw your attention to Church Hill.

You have added a short section of highway (the length of the footway) which is actually a duplication an existing way. It's tagged ford=yes and highway=service, ther...
12017-01-04 11:10:44 UTCDerick Rethans Hi!

And welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your note says that you live here, but then you map it as a shelter? That's for giving shelter in forests. What you want to map this at, is a building, with address information (street, housenumber, and postcode).

I realize probably doesn't allow y...
22017-01-04 18:07:52 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I've drawn in a house from Bing imagery around that node, tagged it as a house and noted that you shelter there. Please check and add any other info you can.
32017-01-09 13:18:24 UTChadw I thought there was a general principle that we did not map information about private individuals. If nothing else, it creates Data Protection Act responsibilities - full redaction may be needed if there is a a complaint.

Also mapping internet_access=wlan seems to me to imply at least customer ...
42017-01-09 18:23:48 UTCBCNorwich OK. Reverted my own changeset.
12017-01-07 08:18:55 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to point out that the area (please see here :-, you added has no descriptive tags and thus adds nothing to the database. Map compilers don't know what it is so it's ignored. Could...
22017-01-08 07:10:17 UTCBCNorwich If you are saying in your changeset comment that this area is fenced then it should be tagged such. However please be more precise with the fence line and include any gaps, gates and the status of ways through the fence. Thanks.
12017-01-07 00:08:05 UTCSomeoneElse Hello Mattjon and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Here you've changed Felix Close from being a residential road to a footpath: . If it really is a residential road (which the underlying OS OpenData from which it was added suggests) please don't change ...
22017-01-07 10:32:22 UTCBCNorwich Hi, yes welcome, another observation is that this way has ended up duplicated. When the status of the way is resolved the duplicated way should be removed.
Regards Bernard
12017-01-07 08:34:29 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
OSM is a live worldwide database, we add features ti that are verifiable on the ground for other folk to make good maps. Your addition was obviously a test or an inadvertent addition so I've removed it. Regards
12017-01-06 10:52:47 UTCBCNorwich Hi. There are no footways, footpaths or pavements for pedestrians in Nightingale Close. I've tagged foot use of the highway.
The ways around Scotch Hill are paths, informal pedestrian ways on a desire line. Footways are a formal way usually a pavement or sidewalk, specifically constructed for pede...
12016-12-23 08:45:05 UTCBCNorwich Can you be more precise as to the position, middle of the walkway doesn't really help. A name and any other details would be helpful as well.
22017-01-05 14:16:27 UTCBCNorwich No response so removed as no information can be gained.
12017-01-05 13:57:38 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I removed the address from the building, as it has several addresses for many areas of the building. Placed address and extra details on the POI.
12017-01-04 18:08:55 UTCtrigpoint Hi, welcome to OSM. This should probably be amenity=social club, bar implies it is open to the public, whereas a social club has membership rules.
Cheers Phil
22017-01-04 19:56:08 UTCBCNorwich Yes welcome to OSM. Actually the facility is already mapped and all information is on the building outline. It is tagged as amenity=social_club, so I have removed your POI so as not to duplicate the information, hope that's OK.
32017-01-04 19:59:23 UTCtrigpoint Well spotted, the building and club outline are separate and overlapping ways. That could do with a tidy up while you are removing the node.
42017-01-04 21:02:22 UTCBCNorwich Sorry forgot to mention the duplicate I removed as well.
12017-01-02 19:07:31 UTCBCNorwich Hello there, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Untagged way 463240250 that just goes out into a field, was that inadvertent, can it be removed?
22017-01-03 16:58:21 UTCSam Liam Perkins If you mean Pen Hill Lane, that was meant to be there.
If you mean something else that I missed, feel free.
32017-01-03 17:00:28 UTCSam Liam Perkins Oh, I see what you meant now. Stupid spindly bit I left poking off of Mill Lane. Yes, that was an accident, you can remove that.
42017-01-03 17:08:04 UTCBCNorwich OK, removed.
12017-01-03 07:34:30 UTCBCNorwich Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
These two additions look like fiction, a nightclub in a grassed park, a highway rest area in the middle of a street. You either had a very good night or a very bad one.
I have removed the features, however if you can show me wrong I'll gladly apologise and put the ...
12017-01-01 18:38:48 UTCBCNorwich Many inaccuracy's were left, I've repaired as many as I can easily see.
12017-01-01 11:16:32 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately this changeset has made two highways over the same route, a footway and a cycleway. To the South East one reaches the road the other doesn't. The route across this field (as shown on the OS map) is a designated right of way being a public footpath. ...
12017-01-01 10:54:32 UTCBCNorwich Hello there, are you sure this building is named correctly? OS map has the name as Laurel Farm.
12016-12-31 17:19:22 UTCBCNorwich Hello several highways that you've tagged as sidewalk to one side or the other actually have sidewalks on both sides for some sections, in one case there is a section with no sidewalk at all, left or right.
22016-12-31 19:28:52 UTCitstricky Hi BCNorwich,
Thanks for the feedback. In cases where a pavement ceases and/or (re)commences, would it instead be desirable to split the sidewalk off to a separate footpath running alongside, or split the actual roadway into sections to allow for more accurate sidewalk mapping? I couldn't find guid...
32016-12-31 20:28:51 UTCBCNorwich Hello There, It's usual to split the highway into sections to accommodate changes in the highways characteristics, be that a change in sidewalk, speed limit, name change or designation etc. As for sidewalks (pavements to the side of roads usually separated from the carriageway by a kerb) it's usual ...
12016-12-31 17:29:42 UTCBCNorwich I just looked at the mapping here and observe that one path is not joined to the highway network at either end. The other looks like it should be joined to the service road.
12016-12-30 19:39:35 UTCBCNorwich Hi, changed the dyke name to South Oby Dyke.
22016-12-30 19:42:10 UTCnorfolkbroadsnetwork Ah, great, cheers!
32016-12-30 20:05:59 UTCBCNorwich No problem. Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've looked at your mapping, made a couple of minor adjustments which I commented on for you to see.
Regards Bernard
42016-12-30 20:09:28 UTCnorfolkbroadsnetwork Great, thanks. We're intending to add a lot more data specific to Boaters.
12016-12-30 19:50:52 UTCBCNorwich Adjusted tag amenity numbering.
22016-12-30 19:57:59 UTCBCNorwich Although the underscore is not incorrect it shows as not right in some tagging checkers. The colon does not present an anomaly and putting the numbers from (no number) 0 upwards keeps features numerically in line.
I think that makes sense!
12016-12-30 15:19:50 UTCchillly Welcome to OSM.

Are you trying to make new Pokémon sites by any chance?

We like to see new editors, if you have any questions, feel free to ask
22016-12-30 17:27:21 UTCBCNorwich Hi, could you please verify that the four park areas are recreation areas that are open to the public?
If they are then it would be good to map the access to them.
If they are not then leisure=park is not a correct description to use. Perhaps landuse=grass/meadow or
natural=grassland would be be...
12016-12-28 07:36:17 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just wanted to let you know that it's not necessary to always tag a two-way road as 'oneway=no'. A two way road without a 'oneway key/tag' is, (in the absence of a 'oneway=yes' tag) automatically taken as being 'oneway=no'
So although not being incorrect ''onewa...
12016-12-27 18:53:21 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I just changed the tag from park to recreation ground to better reflect the areas use.
12016-12-27 18:12:37 UTCchillly Welcome to OSM

When I see your first edit deleting stuff with comment of deleting excessive detail, this is worrying. OSM wants MORE detail not less. Why have you deleted stuff like this?
22016-12-27 18:19:21 UTCchillly Looking at this more closely I have reverted this edit. There is no way all this should be deleted.
32016-12-27 18:47:04 UTCBCNorwich Just wanted to add support to the decision to revert this changeset. It's very easy to make mistakes when you first jump into OSM mapping, I'm sure freefromsociety can make positive contributions. Just takes little research as to best practices first.
42016-12-28 09:27:31 UTCSomeoneElse Whilst it might make sense to restore some of this detail, I'm a bit sceptical about others - I doubt that is any sort of "pedestrian area", for example.
52016-12-28 14:04:24 UTCtrigpoint Also, whilst not part of this changeset. The A16 is incorrectly mapped as a dual carriageway. This could use a tidy up.
12016-12-26 14:06:31 UTCBCNorwich Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've looked at what you've added to the database and see quite a few problems. The Howardian Hills: Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty is not just the area you mapped (please see the map here :-
There is no lar...
12016-12-25 16:37:22 UTCBCNorwich Hi, you need to tag the buildings (building=house) otherwise they won't show on the map. I've done the ones at Marzion.
12016-07-25 17:49:49 UTCBCNorwich Hi, a few of your ways are not tagged!
22016-07-25 17:52:11 UTCBCNorwich Forgot to say please see :-
32016-12-25 11:18:38 UTCBCNorwich No reply so removed some untagged ways.
12016-12-25 10:47:38 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenSreetMap.
You might not be aware that OSM is a live worldwide database. Thus everything we add must be correct and precise. I have reverted your changeset/additions because they added ways are duplicates and somewhat fictitious. I hope you can understand the desire to keep ...
12016-12-18 17:16:52 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap, a live worldwide database from which folk make lots of maps.
I just looked at your addition to OSM and there are some problems. You've somehow added an area on Ledborough Road, 600 feet long 0ft wide. The candle company does not exist in the middle of Wilton Roa...
22016-12-25 08:41:15 UTCBCNorwich No response from the mapper so the changeset has been reverted.
12016-12-23 11:20:41 UTClostmike Welcome to OSM
Why have you extended this footpath on to existing streets? There's really no need to add separate ways for this.
22016-12-25 08:35:53 UTCBCNorwich Yes Welcome to OpenStreetMap, I have reverted your changeset because the duplicated ways would only serve to disrupt existing data. If you need any help adding something please just ask or read up how to do it properly. There's a help section here :-
12016-12-25 08:16:43 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I removed a path and an untagged way which looked totally out of place, I suppose you're still learning. Please remember this is a live worldwide database. Please don't upload stuff till you're sure it's correct. Regards & Thanks
12016-12-25 08:10:08 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I have reverted this changeset because it inadvertently dragged parish boundary, paths, roads ect out of original alignment.
12016-12-25 08:01:19 UTCBCNorwich Hello, I've tidied up the paths you marked and placed descriptive tags on them. They will now appear on the map.
I drew the paths from the Bing image, hope they are OK. How do the paths connect to the recreation ground and/or paths to the south please? Also do you know details of the nature trail a...
12016-12-25 07:55:41 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I've drawn the recreation ground which is all foot access.
12016-12-25 06:51:48 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I can find no evidence of this park and stream or moat. With three houses being demolished there should have been a planning request at least. I have therefore removed your additions.
Perhaps the park is in a different place? Your mapping was actually pretty go...
22016-12-26 06:53:13 UTCGlassman I suspect this was an attempt to influence pokemon go. Good to see it removed.
12016-12-23 21:39:59 UTCtrigpoint Hi, welcome to OSM. Please remember that OSM is a live database, and we only map what exists in the real world.
Aerial imagery suggests that this path does not exist, can you convince me otherwise?
22016-12-24 08:15:25 UTCBCNorwich Yes Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The park doesn't look right either. I can find no reference to a park or public space here. It is likely to be part of Woolmer's park, a large farm.
32016-12-24 11:07:35 UTCtrigpoint Reverted
12016-12-24 07:41:42 UTCBCNorwich Hello, This path duplicates a way already mapped as a shared cycleway. It adds nothing so should really be removed.
12016-12-24 07:05:29 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Thanks for adding the park. Just a few pointers I have removed a duplicate park outline. Amended the park outline, name and path.
There are many more features to this new park it would be good if you could survey and map them.
Regards Bernard
12016-12-23 16:44:20 UTCBCNorwich Outline of park area is mapped, no need for a POI
12016-12-23 13:53:30 UTCBCNorwich removed duplicated way, added foot=yes tag to specifically imply foot use.
12016-12-23 13:50:06 UTCBCNorwich Hi you now have here the existing service road (Greenwich Industrial Estate) and your footpath (the movement) on top of each other. One must be wrong?
Also each word in a proper name should be capitalised.
22016-12-23 14:02:11 UTCCarlos Quiñones Seirul-lo There is no industrial Estate anymore for a few years. Now there's a housing complex called The Movement and this path is a very good shortcut to the greenwich train station
12016-12-23 09:43:57 UTCBCNorwich Northern section of path was a duplication of an existing cycleway.
12016-12-23 08:41:12 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The name at least, and perhaps the website and address would be very helpful additions to the database.
12016-12-23 06:59:10 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just looked at your addition to the OSM database. This way is already in OSM so the new way is a duplication, thus I have removed it. You did add some new data which I have included on the existing way. I also see the way extends to the service road at north so...
12016-12-22 18:33:00 UTCBCNorwich Added your post:postcode=E3 5GY onto the highway as postalcode=E3 5GY which is the correct way to add this information to a highway. Regards
12016-12-22 18:22:48 UTCBCNorwich Hi just removed housename =1 as that is not the house name.
12016-12-08 18:56:20 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I can find no reference to a hostel on Henrietta Street, Spalding. Items added to the OSM database must be verifiable by some means, preferably on the ground. Can you show that this POI exists please?
22016-12-22 08:51:44 UTCBCNorwich No response so POI removed.
12016-12-21 18:58:18 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Sadly your first addition to the OSM database has gone wrong. I have had to revert your changeset that has inadvertently dragged the building outline out of shape. Everything is now back as it was.
12016-12-18 08:38:37 UTCBCNorwich You should have been alerted by my comments by now. So can you please finish with adding fiction to the map? It's rather a silly game but you've shown that you do have good skills for mapping. The OpenStreetMap community would like to make you welcome to contribute in a more constructive way.
All B...
22016-12-18 23:28:44 UTCSomeoneElse @BCNorwich , see .
32016-12-20 08:20:02 UTCBCNorwich @SomeoneElse, Have you removed all the fiction? As I usually follow up what I comment on.
42016-12-20 09:13:51 UTCSomeoneElse @BCNorwich finds couple of nodes created in - that probably needs looking at to see what joins were created there.
12016-12-18 17:29:10 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
May I point out that the building you've address tagged as number 19 is actually a pair of semi detached houses. The address would only apply to one house not both. The other buildings are semis as well. If you need help splitting the building please just ask.
12016-12-18 12:02:50 UTCBCNorwich removed as mapped in the wrong place.
12016-11-29 18:16:43 UTCBCNorwich Hello There,
I just wanted to point out a few problems I can see in this changeset.
The highway=track that you've drawn continuously up and down the field are not highways. They are the trails the tractor made while ploughing and planting the crop.
The south field is not landuse=grass it should ...
22016-12-18 11:50:24 UTCBCNorwich Not response so fiction is now deleted.
12016-12-18 08:39:56 UTCBCNorwich Fiction.
12016-12-18 08:32:04 UTCBCNorwich Fiction, and not very imaginative.
12016-12-18 08:28:19 UTCBCNorwich Middle of the sea?
12016-12-18 08:27:00 UTCBCNorwich ?
12016-12-18 08:25:09 UTCBCNorwich Fiction? name is tagged wrong, way goes across fields.
12016-12-18 08:22:42 UTCBCNorwich Again fields.
12016-12-18 08:20:30 UTCBCNorwich In the middle of a field?
12016-12-18 08:17:02 UTCBCNorwich This is reverted, looks like it was a practice or something went wrong. There was a building on-top of a building with one corner dragged up over the railway line 1/2 mile away.
12016-12-18 08:12:36 UTCBCNorwich Hi, the new path is mapped on top of some buildings, as described by the tag layer=1 which means that item is above the building. But it is also tagged tunnel=yes which indicates it is under or through the building.
Clearly the is something not quite right or lacking here?
12016-12-18 07:58:00 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted this addition as the new road (Residential Road) is a fiction possibly added by mistake or as a test. The live worldwide database is not the place for testing. Regards
12016-12-18 07:11:34 UTCBCNorwich With respect, Way: 447956699 lacks any tagging and looks a bit unusual. Regards
22016-12-18 21:08:03 UTCSK53 Removed. Turns out it was an accidentally duplicated from the grammar school way even though it doesnt look quite the same.
12016-12-17 21:02:02 UTCBCNorwich Hello There, I think you may be mistaken regarding the existence of this path. There is a faint path that can be seen on the Bing image from the end of the track. (Certainly the track section ought not be deleted.) The mapper uploaded a gpx trace for the whole route. Starting from the car park going...
12016-12-17 19:40:11 UTCBCNorwich Tweaked school building and tags.
12016-12-17 19:27:56 UTCBCNorwich Removed building which was mapped on the pedestrian bridge over the railway. Station is already mapped.
12016-12-17 19:20:11 UTCBCNorwich Tweaked the building outlines and addresses.
12016-12-17 19:08:50 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
May I please point out that this addition to the OSM database inadvertently duplicate a residential land use area. There are more than fifty house numbers, not just the one you added. There are two or more postcodes.
Post codes and house numbers are best added ...
12016-12-15 13:40:57 UTCBCNorwich Hello, just wanted to let you know that this is a live worldwide database from which lots of ordinary folk build maps. So I have removed your track.
You are most welcome to add genuine features to OSM and there are plenty of resources to learn how to do this properly.
12016-12-15 13:08:52 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It is impossible to work out what you wanted to achieve with this addition to the live OSM database as there are no descriptive tags. What I can deduce is that as far as I am aware this line is not verifiable as existing in reality, (unless you can enlighten me)....
22016-12-15 15:05:26 UTCBrianWharf Feel free, what I was trying to achieve doesn't seem possible here. Also, you may wish to get somebody to read back your text as some of it seems rather condescending.
32016-12-15 16:23:49 UTCtrigpoint What were you trying to achieve? Maybe someone can help. OSN is based around tags, so any untagged object will do nothing in OSM.
12016-12-15 09:30:49 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have removed the address tags, as there are several post codes and hundreds of numbers on this road also the name was already tagged.
I think there are other roads near/adjoining that have 20mph limits, it would be good if you could survey and map those limits...
12016-12-14 07:26:43 UTCBCNorwich Hi, are you sure Fairways joins to Granville Road here now, there was a fence and verge separating them?
22016-12-14 08:31:06 UTCMintra Not sure what you mean by the fence and verge "separating" them, but then I did not see it before. Certainly it is now an open and working junction.
12016-12-13 06:49:23 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Thanks for the recent additions to the OSM database. I have however removed POIs :- Westminister Abbey, Trafalgar Square, and both National Gallery. The reason being that the information in the POIs is already mapped/contained on the feature (area or building). T...
12016-12-12 07:32:15 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted your changeset in order to reinstate the altered land/building use tags, thus maintain the business park area. Also to reinstate positions of highways inadvertently moved.
This reversion reinstates the Gomez building which was deleted. Added a f...
12016-12-08 14:55:11 UTCBCNorwich Outlined areas of heath you have mapped have several sections where the line doubles back on itself. It's really very easy to map areas like this correctly. Please read up on better methods as you are repeatedly doing this. See
22016-12-10 12:55:39 UTCBCNorwich Removed several area outline self intersections and re-tagged areas. Much better now.
32016-12-10 13:18:26 UTCSomeoneElse @BCNorwich - thanks.
12016-12-10 12:50:22 UTCBCNorwich Removed some self intersecting area outlines for you.
12016-12-08 15:07:50 UTCBCNorwich Hi, a lot of the area you have mapped as heath is actually forest.
12016-12-08 15:05:48 UTCBCNorwich More self intersections of area outline.
Plus now including large obvious areas of water in you natural=heath.
Please take time to map things properly.
12016-12-08 14:57:18 UTCBCNorwich Removed self intersection from area outline of natural=wood
12016-12-07 18:55:14 UTCTomas Straupis This change will be reverted because it is made with no local knowledge, based on incorrect microsoft/bing data and very inaccurate mapbox "calculations" etc.
22016-12-07 19:24:22 UTCBCNorwich Hi, thanks for the correction and thanks for not just reverting but making better adjustments.
12016-12-07 16:40:27 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted this changeset in order to put back into its original place a footpath that was inadvertently moved.
12016-11-23 20:54:53 UTCBCNorwich Re-tagged to show disused as pub with note on new use. More appropriate that a fictitious name.
22016-12-06 07:35:30 UTCBCNorwich Alterations did not upload, now redone.
12016-11-23 15:01:31 UTCBCNorwich This is Southend University Hospital - MSCP.
There are now two car parks mapped on top of each other. The service road layout has also changed.
22016-12-06 07:14:17 UTCLord Hartley Yes, I know, I work there and slowly getting site plans and making adjustments..
32016-12-06 07:25:53 UTCBCNorwich OK thanks!
12016-12-04 19:37:48 UTCBCNorwich Hello, why map this heath area on top of the already mapped forest areas? It really doesn't make much sense, especially as it's very easy to map the areas correctly from the Bing image that you seem to be traceing.
12016-12-03 07:41:02 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Things added to OSM must SerVre a purpose and be verifiable on the ground by all. I take it that this castle is in your mind and therefore only verifiable by your good self. I will revert the addition, reverting means it can easily be reinstated should you be abl...
12016-12-03 07:26:20 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your outline is not correct with regard to Bloody Oaks Quarry nature reserve. It is a Leicestershire & Rutland Wildlife Trust property outline shown here :-

22016-12-03 08:47:35 UTCRodgersJS Hi, The area I outined is in fact the reserve. I've visited it often
12016-11-28 17:54:11 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see you made your first contribution to the map. Unfortunately it looks like a fiction, obviously just a test. I have reverted that trial run so no harm is done to the live worldwide database.
If you wish to make a usefull addition I would suggest starting her...
12016-11-28 09:44:06 UTCBCNorwich Hello There,
You've made some really good additions to OpenStreetMap, I'm sure the community appreciates that.
The latest additions/alterations however are a bit silly so I have reverted those changes.
12016-11-27 12:14:46 UTCBCNorwich Fictions have been deleted.
12016-11-27 12:14:34 UTCBCNorwich Fictions have been deleted.
12016-11-27 12:14:01 UTCBCNorwich Fictions have been reverted.
12016-11-27 12:13:39 UTCBCNorwich Fictions have been reverted.
12016-11-27 12:13:20 UTCBCNorwich Fictions have been reverted.
12016-11-27 12:13:05 UTCBCNorwich Fictions have been reverted.
12016-11-27 12:12:50 UTCBCNorwich Fictions have been reverted.
12016-11-27 12:12:33 UTCBCNorwich Fictions have been reverted.
12016-11-27 12:12:08 UTCBCNorwich Fictions have been reverted.
12016-11-26 16:09:28 UTCtrigpoint Hi, this should probably be tagged as a gallery rather than an artwork.
Cheers Phil
22016-11-26 16:32:09 UTCBCNorwich Agree, changed.
12016-11-25 14:08:59 UTCtrigpoint Hi, changing Tesco Express from amenity=fuel to a shelter looks very odd to me. Is there a good reason for that?
Cheers Phil
22016-11-25 14:32:09 UTCBCNorwich Sorry, I wanted to add the feature/area as a shelter but failed to realise I was removing the fuel tag from amenity.
Looking at it again shelter doesn't seem right anyway. Now found building=canopy, perfect.
12016-11-23 18:32:10 UTCtrigpoint Hi, welcome to OSM. There is no need to fill the name tag with what is a description.
We can see it is a postbox from its amenity tag.
Cheers Phil
22016-11-25 07:41:29 UTCBCNorwich Corrected operator name spelling and collection time syntax.
12016-11-25 07:30:02 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This is a live worldwide database from which hundreds of maps are made. As such it relies on the data provided by folk like you to be precise and accurate. Unfortunately you newly added path is somewhat lacking.

Your path lacks any description tags thus map ma...
12016-11-24 09:32:03 UTCBCNorwich Hi and welcome to the worldwide OpenStreetMap database.
Your three recently mapped POI are complete fiction so I have reverted the changesets. Everything added to the OSM database must be verifiable on the ground and the is nothing verifiable at these three positions. Please feel free to map the ad...
12016-11-24 09:20:49 UTCBCNorwich Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've joined your new path to the rest of the highway system. As it was the path wasn't linked to anywhere, so therefore pretty useless. Joined up routers can use it to guide folk.
22016-11-26 13:10:35 UTCdjcater This was my first edit, thank you for linking it up! Looks great.
12016-11-19 08:50:11 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've looked through your first additions to the live worldwide OSM database and would like to make a few comments, (comments hopefully to allow your mapping contributions to be more meaningful).
All your uploaded changesets have the same comment, (the HOT one yo...
12016-11-16 08:39:16 UTCBCNorwich Hi, there are now several sections of duplicated highway. The existing mapped highways have a second highway placed on top of it. There is only one highway which could accommodate all descriptive tags. But the existing highway should take precedence for routeing purposes.
22017-04-13 12:08:33 UTCValleys Cycling Hi, I am sorry, I have only just noticed your discussion comment. I shall try and edit but I am still learning. In some places I do not want to show the proposed cycleway as part of the existing highway as it might be a proposed new section alongside the road. At other points I do want the cycleway ...
32017-04-13 22:27:19 UTCValleys Cycling I have edited these now so there shouldn't be highways on top of highways. Any other feedback, let me know.
12016-11-15 08:06:18 UTCBCNorwich Hello, I just wanted to point out that your recent mapping contains numerous self intersections on heath area outlines. Please see here for examples :-,self_intersection_po...
12016-11-11 07:53:00 UTCBCNorwich Doesn't really convey the fact that this is a "Children's Play Area and Hard Court".
Also "By Village Hall" is not it's name, rather a description as to its location, (beside the village hall).
12016-11-11 07:42:31 UTCBCNorwich South Woodham Garage I think. Do they still sell fuel?
12016-11-11 07:09:27 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I have put the full name for this works on the property that was already mapped. Thus the property is updated and the POI unnecessary so is removed.
12016-11-06 18:37:21 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Features added to the OSM database must be factual and verifiable on the ground by any one. So this POI looks like it is a fiction.
It is in fact a Post Box address and as such should be removed.
22016-11-08 18:57:56 UTCtrigpoint Should we not just remove the spam, and tag it as a postbox. The shop could probably use a post office node too?
32016-11-08 20:52:30 UTCBCNorwich Agreed that makes sense. My information came from a web search so I'm not free to transfer that positional data. If you're happy please make the change.
12016-11-08 08:44:41 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted your addition/alteration to the OSM database as it actually adds nothing, just drags two other highways out of alignment. So in effect I have put the highways back as they were.

Please take a little time to learn OSM basics before having anothe...
12016-11-06 17:39:53 UTCtrigpoint If is a postbox, then it should be tagged amenity=postbox, there will be a ref on the plate. It will not have a postcode as it is not somewhere post is delivered to.
22016-11-06 17:49:12 UTCJim Thurston This is the postal address for The Maylands Mayl - The PostBox is where the mail is placed so that it doesn't get mixed up with the mail for the supermarket.
32016-11-06 18:27:47 UTCtrigpoint So is thete an office inside the supermarket building?
42016-11-06 18:47:20 UTCBCNorwich Hi, this is a Post Office Box presumably inside the post office not outside the building. From their website ( there is no office at the building.
12016-10-30 06:49:08 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Please read up a bit before adding features to the OSM database as it's a live worldwide site from which folk make maps. Please see the Help items at the top of the page. Incomplete or incorrect data tends to mess with proper rendering.
Your two nodes near bank ...
22016-11-06 09:25:46 UTCBCNorwich Two untagged nodes removed, Safe Haven added.
12016-11-04 14:19:35 UTCBCNorwich All are sadly lacking information, some are wrong.
12016-11-03 18:38:05 UTCtrigpoint Again, is this really here?
22016-11-03 18:41:11 UTCtrigpoint It is too close to to be likely
32016-11-04 14:11:02 UTCBCNorwich This node is not listed on the website :-
There is a bike rental place listed and mapped just over the water on Goods Way.
42016-11-04 16:54:30 UTCtrigpoint I had already pointed out that node, and we really should not be using gm based
12016-11-03 18:36:22 UTCtrigpoint Hi, welcome to OSM.
This edit looks a little odd, the name indicates that these should be bicycle_hire but I am not sure about these. There are others mapped nearby and it is unlikely that such things would be missing from the map. Do you have any more information?
22016-11-04 07:21:27 UTCBCNorwich I don't think 4478909590 exists, but there is a dock round the corner on Greenland Road.
The other two I've tagged similar to other cycle hire stations. If Lui_E98 would like to look at these and use this type of tagging it would concur with how other stations are mapped.
32016-11-04 11:54:44 UTCtrigpoint I am not convinced any exist, discussion on irc suggested that they are personal markers of some sort. Cycle hire is not something our London mappers generally miss.
I was planning to revert, just seeing if I can get a response from the user.
42016-11-04 14:09:11 UTCBCNorwich Nodes 4478899792 and 4478899791 are listed at the mapped position on the website :-
Node 4478899790 is not listed, there is a bike rental just around the corner.
52016-11-04 18:51:33 UTCSomeoneElse For info, see "message to you as one that has to be read before you can continue mapping" at .
12016-11-03 06:39:45 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see the shop WONDEROUND is not correctly placed and has been situated actually on the street. The shop is some distance up the road beyond Boundary Street, also you've got the number wrong.
It would be best to correct these problems. If you cannot draw the pre...
22016-11-03 15:54:10 UTCytera thank you for the correction. I couldn't correct the mark on the map so I've placed a new mark for WONDEROUND. kindly confirm.
32016-11-03 17:37:54 UTCharg I can only see one of them -- to the East of Boundary Street.

Oh, and could you avoid using all-caps for company names.
42016-11-03 19:14:10 UTCBCNorwich OK the two were in place when the page was refreshed. I've now removed the first (misplaced) one. After a minute and the page refreshed again only the corrected POI displayed. Thanks ytera
As for all capitol letters in the name, that is how the company writes it. I agree it's not good to see.
52016-11-04 02:04:18 UTCytera understood. I've corrected the company name.
12016-11-02 06:54:03 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You've made some useful modifications to the OSM database. One problem that I think you might be unaware of, the placing of a tree in the middle of Waterhouse Lane by the Esso fuel station. Although it appears not to interfere with the highway I think it's fictit...
12016-11-01 07:05:49 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see you have also named that section of highway from the A143 south to Water Lane as Church Road. Your upload comment suggests you did not mean to add the name to the whole section.

Please be aware that a highway can be edited to split the way into two sect...
12016-10-31 07:08:58 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted your change to it's original state because the deleted way was not a duplicate.
The highway you thought was a better placement is actually a bus lane. There are, as can be seen on the Bing image, three ways from Gubbins Lane into Station Road.
12016-10-10 11:01:53 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Several of the ways you've recently added to OSM are not joined to the roads that they go to, (in this and other change-sets). Also in many instances they cross streams and other boundary's without showing how these barriers are overcome.

May I suggest you read...
22016-10-30 07:24:28 UTCBCNorwich Tidied up quite a few footpaths, corrected where paths cross water and added a few bridges.
12016-10-29 17:15:00 UTCBCNorwich Hi, you've placed a park inside of a park which doesn't seem correct. Further the two park boundaries are joined at one of the nodes.
12016-10-29 17:09:15 UTCBCNorwich A brief look at the paths you've added shows a few anomalies. Several paths are not connected to the roads that they got to. Several paths are on such similar lines that they might be duplication's. Several paths are joined to or go along area outlines. It might be wise to look at them all and recti...
12016-10-28 05:52:08 UTCBCNorwich Hello, I think you have positioned this property on the wrong side of the road (as far as the existing mapping of roads is concerned). It is not therefore verifiable on the ground as mapped.
Further it is very unlikely that the feature is officially name "Home". Also if it is your home i...
22016-11-04 23:10:27 UTCtrigpoint Reverting #DROB
12016-10-28 05:39:51 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This area looks like it is entirely residential with no shops. Could you please state the name and details of the business? Is it a business operated from a house? Does it have a website to verify it exists?
Features added to the OSM database should be verifiab...
12016-10-27 17:32:24 UTCHarry Wood Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see you've added "my home". It worked! But I guess there is no guesthouse called "my home" here. Instead I've changed it for you, to be a building=house. The address information is still on there, and that's great. You're welcome to add more address...
22016-10-27 18:53:15 UTCBCNorwich Yes Welcome, I've just corrected the postcode for you.
12016-10-27 17:53:47 UTCBCNorwich Hello, your opening hours are incorrectly presented. please see :-
12016-10-26 17:30:46 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think if you visit this footpath you will find it is a public right of way. Therefore tagging should reflect this, foot=designated, designation=public_footpath also access=permissive is incorrect and should be removed.
12016-10-24 09:32:32 UTCBCNorwich Hello this "line i9n bow" that you have added to the OSM database does not contain enough information to be of any use. Unless you can expand on it, or explain it then it should be removed.
12016-10-24 09:24:17 UTCBCNorwich Hello, can you state the purpose of this "blook line"? What is it, what is it for, is it verifiable? You have added it to the OMS live database and I can see no reason for it. Thanks.
12016-10-18 07:13:15 UTCBCNorwich For your attention please. There is still a lot more duplicated ways where you have placed a new footway on top of existing highways. The whole lot should be removed as it is incorrect, (there are not two ways one atop another), and it corrupts routing software.
22016-10-19 19:16:09 UTCMorrolan My apologies for my ignorance - as I created this as one single line, I assumed that deleting it would remove all traces, however as you say this doesn't appear to be the case.

Please could you point me to a specific point where this is still in error (or inform me what I am looking for, i.e. how...
32016-10-19 19:53:15 UTCBCNorwich HI, I could now only find one long section of duplication near Kinmel Bay, I've deleted it all rather than trying to explain where it is. I think you've removed all the other sections. I noticed the duplication's as I regularly check new mapping for these problems here :-
42016-10-20 10:36:50 UTCMorrolan Hi Bernard, many thanks for that. I will ensure that I read the url's you sent me so that I can avoid causing more issues in the future.

The Wales Coast Path, whilst it does share some coastal distance, is a separate path from the North Wales Path which ventures inland from the coast. However i...
12016-10-18 12:21:30 UTCBCNorwich Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately your up updating of this way has resulted in a duplication of highways, (one atop another). There seems to be no on the ground restriction to access through this way so I wonder why the access=private tag? Nor any official 20mph restriction that is v...
12016-10-17 06:10:37 UTCBCNorwich Hello, sorry to say I think you've had a mishap with this changeset. Please see

It looks like Way: Duddingston Gardens (93715163) has been aligned in a circle. Also dragging part of the railway fence, which shared several nodes, with it (Way: 405090252)....
12016-10-14 05:39:52 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I'd just like to point out that your addition to the database (highway named Hudson Way) is not joined to the existing highway network. If you know it is joined to the network then it would be good for you to map it as such. The road immediately north is a serv...
12016-09-22 17:58:14 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
There is still a problem here, your addition and subsequent amendments leave a duplicated outline for the building. Both outlines similarly tagged.
With respect I think the eastern third of the building might be a house. The western two thirds may be two houses ...
22016-10-12 07:19:56 UTCBCNorwich No response, duplicate removed.
12016-10-11 08:18:53 UTCBCNorwich Hello, I've reverted your addition to the OpenStreetMap database. Reason being that this building is not at Romola Road.
12016-10-11 05:40:15 UTCBCNorwich Change-set reverted!
Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately your first addition to the OSM database went a bit wrong it inadvertently altered existing data and added a road haphazardly through buildings. Therefore I have reverted those alterations for you. I would suggest you read up ...
12016-10-10 11:23:51 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your addition to OSM of the sandwich shop, addressed as Washington has appeared in London UK. You've tagged it as a place of worship.

If you can't amend it I'll remove it shortly. Regards
12016-10-10 11:14:10 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've tidied up your additions and changed the name tag on the garden to a note tag, I don't think that was the proper name for the area. I added landuse=grass to indicate the surface and removed the area tag, (a way, (line) enclosing an area is taken as an area a...
12016-10-09 11:37:50 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think some of the changes you made to Whiting's Lane are incorrect.
This is a Norfolk County Council maintained unsurfaced road, reference U33198. Therefore, as far as OSM mapping is concerned, an unclassified highway, even though it may appear to be only a tr...
22016-10-09 12:48:41 UTCnjwcat7 Hi Bernard

I've changed the vehicle classification back; that wasn't an intended edit but probably a result of a bit of fat-fingers on my part :)

I'm trying to get it shown for what it us; an unpaved road that's too rough to ride a road bike down. Having found this out the hard way yesterday w...
32016-10-10 10:55:24 UTCSomeoneElse Personally if something appears to be a track I'd map it as a track :)
There are plenty of places that are some sort of "road" (e.g. ) which are best described as tracks; perhaps a designation of "unclassified_road" might work to indica...
12016-10-07 14:39:52 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The node you added is untagged and in the middle of a featureless body of water. As such it adds nothing to the OSM database and should be removed.
12016-10-06 18:02:24 UTCBCNorwich Hello, I just want to point out that in adding the North Wales Path you have duplicated lots of highways. You've placed a new way on top of a lot of existing ways. A better way would be to segment the existing ways and add them to a relation, naming that relation the North Wales Path. The Wales Coas...
22016-10-06 18:08:36 UTCBCNorwich I forgot to say that in great many places you now have a footway going down the middle of a vehicle highway. This duplication also seriously messes up routing.
12016-10-02 05:59:29 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The positioning of this hotel POI, in the alley behind buildings, some way away fro the address of Romford Road, will not be much help in helping folk to find it. Better to actually draw the building and state the floor if the building has multiple businesses.
22016-10-02 12:08:14 UTCtrigpoint The name translates as house, which is an unlikely name for a hotel so I suspect this yet another personal marker edit from a user. Reverting this.
12016-09-30 19:27:40 UTCBCNorwich Hello, your hedge "way 443736827" covers the whole of the road Roud Road. Surely this cannot be correct.
22016-09-30 19:44:40 UTCBCNorwich Also hedge way 443736828 is mapped the same. This effectively places a barrier across the whole highway. Better to map each hedge separately. An individual hedge as a linear feature can have a width (and height) tag added thereby not needing an area drawn. For an extremely thick hedge draw a closed ...
12016-09-27 17:48:10 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I noticed your addition to the OSM database and made a few alterations to better reflect the geography. Your address was on the whole building not just the bar. Regards
12016-09-26 13:51:42 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
There are a few things wrong with your addition of this bar to the OSM database. Firstly unless it has recently moved from number 3 to number 12 Balham High Road then you have placed it in the wrong position. Further the name:en tag is not needed (you've already ...
12016-08-25 17:27:17 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You have mapped your company on a block of residential apartments. You've given it an American address and phone number, also abbreviated the street name. You've tagged it as amenity=place_of_worship. All of which are obviously wrong. The website makes no mention...
22016-09-23 17:31:17 UTCBCNorwich No response from mapper so the obviously incorrect data has been removed.
12016-09-21 13:17:18 UTCtrigpoint Hi, welcome to osm. Do you have a shop customers can visit here?
22016-09-21 18:18:11 UTCBCNorwich There's no shop, that address is the registered company office for an online wine seller.
12016-09-17 17:01:37 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just an observation, I notice that Accommodation Way is not connected to Wayside/Woodside. I suspect that the ways do in fact join so it would be best to connect them in the database, thus routing can be computed and folk can render maps accordingly. Regards
22016-09-30 13:10:27 UTCJan Swanwick Thanks for the feedback. It was my first addition, so hopefully today's edit will have corrected it and made it routable.

12016-09-17 05:47:16 UTCBCNorwich Hello, your addition of Hyde Park Place made a duplicated highway. I have therefore removed your duplicate and amended street names.
12016-09-16 12:16:24 UTCtrigpoint Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution, however the Premier Inn is already mapped on the surrounding way, I am going to remove your duplicate.
When editing please capitalise names properly. Thanks
22016-09-16 18:30:53 UTCBCNorwich POI deleted before I saw the above comment.
Note also that the tag name:en=??? is not needed.
32016-09-17 09:30:36 UTCtrigpoint Sorry, I meant to delete the node when I got home.
The name:en problem is a feature of, not something the user has any control of.
12016-09-16 05:38:10 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The complete details for The Lamb hotel are on the building outline. I have therefore removed your duplicated information.
12016-09-15 11:04:33 UTCDaveF Hi
Brunswick Place is the name of the southern terrace of houses & so is not an alternative road name. (Montpelier is the name of the row opposite) This happens a lot in Bath.
Julian Road is the road's name throughout.
22016-09-15 14:14:53 UTCBCNorwich Hi, OK I understand and agree with that. Mapper LegBritSlav added a way which duplicated part of Julian Road, I removed the duplication but kept the name thinking it might be valid.
The alt:name is now removed and a note added with your information about the terraces.
12016-09-14 00:20:52 UTCSomeoneElse Hello,
You've made the bus stop at into a bookmaker. This seems unlikely. Can you explain what happened?
22016-09-14 05:36:48 UTCBCNorwich Hello,
You've also added bicycle parking which is actually bicycle rental.
Also tourism=attraction is not very helpful, if you know there is an attraction there why not detail it?
So it unfortunately looks like all three additions are somewhat fictitious. Please correct the mistakes or remove th...
12016-09-13 06:52:06 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted your addition of a name to a building because the tag name:en=??? is not needed here.
Also that is not the name of that store and in any case what you added was an address "31 green street". Which lacks capitol letters and is in fact s...
12016-09-12 14:36:05 UTCBCNorwich Hello, you've positioned your company 'Moving In' in a building on Floral Street not on Long Acre.
12016-08-18 06:26:52 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I notice that the two hotels you have added are not named and are in very close proximity to two named hotels. If you are mapping The Westbury Hotel and The Washington Hotel then your new POI are duplication's and should be removed.
If your new POI are indeed in...
22016-09-12 05:40:14 UTCBCNorwich No response from Alwaleed aljamaan so the two duplicates are removed.
12016-09-11 18:11:29 UTCBCNorwich Hello There, I think you've made a few mistakes on Cleveland Gardens.
Highway=residential has been removed.
Motor_vehicle=no is added, but vehicles are allowed on that road.
Access=permissive added, the permissiveness is only through the bollards not the whole road,
Barrier=gate added, the gate ...
12016-09-09 17:41:10 UTCBCNorwich Hi, the tag name:en=??? is removed as it is not needed. Phone number is corrected.
12016-09-09 17:33:10 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see you have added a name to this area. I am certain that the area is not named "clothes London" in either English or Polish so I have reverted the changes. Please take great care when adding to OSM as it is a live database used by folk the world over...
12016-09-06 15:08:15 UTCBCNorwich Hi, the Prince of Wales is already mapped. Yours is a duplicate so I've removed it.
12016-08-18 06:14:10 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've looked at your first mapping and would like to make a few comments.
You added (inadvertently?) two nodes without description tags (4353676095 and 4353676094), these should be appropriately tagged or if unintentional should be removed.
You added (inadverte...
22016-09-06 05:56:21 UTCBCNorwich No response from mapper Jorik Michiels so two untagged nodes and two untagged ways are now removed. The duplicated airport boundary was deleted by 4b696d a few days ago. The above issue is now resolved.
12016-09-05 06:31:40 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The area you have added to the OSM database is un-tagged and therefore is of little value. The OSM community welcomes new mappers but asks that you please take time to read the instructions.
If you are unable to supply more information for your added feature I w...
22016-09-05 07:56:07 UTCtealover Ok sorry, it was my first try and i was trying to follow the tutorial and have a go. I realised i had made a mistake but couldn't work out how to correct it.
I don't think Open street mapping is for me.
Hope I haven't made any serious damage.
32016-09-05 11:23:32 UTCBCNorwich No trouble and no damage done that can't be remedied. What were you trying to do, add that building? I could do that for you, you can then check it. If not then I'll remove the un-tagged line.
42016-09-06 18:52:57 UTCtealover Thank you, I think if you remove it that will be best.
My son will be able to help me grasp the basics when he is next home.
Thanks for being so helpful.
12016-09-04 06:07:55 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You have severed the North bound carriageway of Molesworth Street (Way 34910533). There is also a short stub of Rennell Street going South East to the service road tagged as :- (highway=trunk,
name=Rennell Street,
oneway=no) which doesn't look correct. Regards
12016-09-03 14:34:19 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have corrected the spelling of your POI and removed the unneeded tag name:en=???.
I've added the website and moved the position.
22016-09-03 17:44:09 UTCtrigpoint The name:en is an annoying "feature" of
12016-08-31 06:21:11 UTCBCNorwich Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
For Pandora it would be better if you could place the POI on the building rather than in the street. The address would help as well.
Bubba Gump, are you sure this is a jewelry shop, looks like a restaurant, Please correct if it's wrong. Also address and precise pos...
22016-08-31 07:27:39 UTCtrigpoint Also, please could you capitalize names properly
12016-08-30 19:23:20 UTCBCNorwich Hi, the shelter looks like it's placed on a block of houses. Are you sure it's placed correctly, and what type of shelter is it.
12016-08-29 06:31:36 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Quite a few of you recently added buildings have problems. Sections of outline tagged only as area=yes, some of these are added to building outlines. Buildings connected by self intersecting lines. Un-tagged building outlines.
I've fixed several of these but it ...
12016-08-01 09:56:57 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It is usual in English to write postcode, street and name with the initial letters as capitols so rather than :-
addr:postcode=nw1 0aa
addr:street=bayham street
name=smart camden inn hostel
You would have :-
addr:postcode=NW1 0AA
addr:street=Bayham Street
22016-08-26 06:38:50 UTCBCNorwich Fiction deleted.
12016-08-26 05:57:44 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The building you named is a group of sheds in back yards. I am pretty sure they are not named and in any case there is no need for name:en tag to be used. It's likely that this changeset would be reverted if you can't offer an explanation and verification. Regards
22016-08-26 09:18:08 UTCDerick Rethans BCNorwich, the Bing imagery could be outdated though. I have fixed the duplicate name/name:en :
12016-08-25 05:55:50 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Sorry to say that your first mapping has gone a bit wrong. There is no Royal National Hotel at the point you mapped it. Nor is this position near Russell Square, Bedford Way.
I am pleased to say that the hotel is mapped correctly at :- https://www.openstreetmap....
12016-08-24 17:57:00 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your new footpath addition duplicated a section of the adjoining footpath. I have rectified the anomaly. Regards
12016-08-24 17:48:04 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately your addition of the SKS building and POI did not go correctly. Not only was your new addition corrupted but it also adversely effected adjoining mapped features.
I apologise but I have reverted your additions in order to put the database back to ...
12016-08-21 17:39:05 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've joined your new path to the road at the east end, (you had it joined to a boundary line). Also added a few details. Regards
22016-08-21 20:34:54 UTCrwatters Many thanks!
12016-08-21 05:41:38 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
May I explain that OSM is a database from which all sorts of maps, for all over the world, for everyone, for free, are compiled. As such anything added to the database that is not compatible to the database standards could be extremely disruptive.
Your addition ...
12016-08-17 07:52:07 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reversed the name change on the bus stop because that name is given by the bus company it is not the actual pub name. Bus company name is "The Gate, adj" meaning that the stop is adjacent to a local feature and not the feature itself.
I have als...
12016-08-14 14:23:10 UTCBCNorwich Hi, the building you've added facing Halliford Street is not a single building but 5 buildings, they look like semi detached houses.
12016-08-12 18:25:56 UTCBCNorwich Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think you may have mapped the surgery on the wrong building.
This building is number 2, the surgery is located at number 2A to the south (see here :- Click this link to see a picture of the correct...
22016-08-16 08:42:24 UTCsenoritachiquita Thank you very much for letting me know, I will move it.
12016-08-11 12:45:42 UTCBCNorwich Hello, Ridge Road looks at lot wider than 7 feet, in fact it looks like it is an extra wide road. It is therefore not correct to tag it as maxwidth=7'0" This is obviously not the case especially as you intimate that it has been tagged thus to discourage traffic.
A better way is to map exactly ...
12016-08-10 12:49:50 UTCBCNorwich I think you've got this cafe in the wrong place, it is already mapped under the parent company name of Benugo at 33 Commercial Road. Your POI should therefore be removed.
22016-08-20 08:53:49 UTCDerick Rethans I've reverted it.
12016-08-05 07:02:04 UTCBCNorwich Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The website you posted for the restaurant is no valid so I have removed it.
22016-08-05 15:49:34 UTCtrigpoint The website which this changeset removed, does appear to be valid.
32016-08-05 15:49:50 UTCtrigpoint
42016-08-05 17:50:27 UTCBCNorwich But apparently the restaurant is now under new ownership and a new name.
12016-08-04 05:54:46 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
That's a block of apartments not just one. So the block address is for all apartments.
12016-08-03 05:49:48 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
OSM is primarily a database rather than a map, information added to the database is then used by anyone to produce maps. We should not add data to influence map rendering. (to make it show up as we would like).

I have removed your Tate POI as it is a duplicati...
12016-08-01 14:04:13 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
OSM is a database rather than just a map. To go with OSM best practice I have made a few adjustments to the POI taxi service you added to the database :-
adjust postcode, capitalize leading letters to road name, changed it to taxi (as per website), changed name...
12016-07-31 07:45:31 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I think you've got some of your kerb's area outlines the wrong way round, please see here as to the direction of the outline way for where the top of the kerb is :-
12016-07-30 06:40:20 UTCBCNorwich Hi, for your information the building was already associated with the street and is also associated (via the street association) with the place Walton-on-the-Naze. Your addition therefore does not add anything to the database except to bloat it a tiny bit.
12016-07-28 16:13:23 UTCTrickyB Incorrect title, should be 'adjusting usage of Broxted Solar Farm Footpath'
22016-07-30 05:59:05 UTCBCNorwich Also you now have two highways along here. Neither of which join to the end of what is named Hall Road. My information shows this section also to be named Hall Road which continues to the cattle grid to the east.
12016-07-28 15:42:35 UTCEdLoach Hi. I noticed your edit and thought maybe you'd like to also set "Allowed Access" to private as well as (or perhaps instead of) the name. This will cause the "P" shown on the standard rendering to be paler than public car parks.
22016-07-30 05:42:25 UTCBCNorwich Removed the name=Private from two car parks. They may be private but there is no suggestion that they are officially or otherwise named "Private". Also added access=private tags.
12016-07-29 14:56:47 UTCBCNorwich Hi, this node is where the footway (Rupert Court) joins with the street (Rupert Street). There in no restaurant in the middle of the street so I will remove it.
If you know where the restaurant is sited please add the POI at that position.
22016-07-30 10:54:38 UTCtrigpoint Looking at the users other edits notes/edits this is a personal marker of where a tourist coach should stop.
I think this should be reverted.
32016-07-30 11:04:46 UTCMike Cahill Well spotted trigpoint....I am a 'tour coach driver' and the flag is for me and my fellow drivers to navigate to that point!
42016-07-30 11:27:07 UTCtrigpoint Is there anything verifiable in these locations, some sort of rule you need to follow?
Although it is clearly wrong to map this as a restaurant it could be a bus stop with some appropiate tags that ensure a normal map user wont walk there to try to catch a normal bus.
52016-08-01 11:48:14 UTCtrigpoint Hi Mike, please could you answer my question?
OSM is a collaborative project and we all need to work as a community. As these edits stand, they are misleading to other map users and need to be corrected, or removed.
If these are official places or marked in some way then they can be tagged accordi...
12016-07-29 05:42:27 UTCBCNorwich Hi, your POI has been added to the live worldwide OpenStreetMap database. Unfortunately the information is incorrect.
Westminster should have a capitol letter W. The park is actually Buckingham Palace Garden and is already mapped as such. (Did the Queen know you were there.) If you mistakenly plac...
12016-07-16 08:18:21 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see you are drawing you buildings from the roof outlines of aerial imagery. With respect may I suggest you read this page :-
which explains how to overcome the oblique angles oft encountered in photo imagery. Your outlines for the ap...
12016-06-27 13:07:28 UTCBCNorwich Hi, this parking area looks like it is not restricted to residents only. It looks like it is part of the highway, if so then the access=private tag should be removed.
22016-07-12 21:05:48 UTCBen Harris I visited Shire Hall today to check the County Council's records, and they believe that the entire parking bay, including the footway behind it, is part of the highway.
32016-07-13 06:19:21 UTCBCNorwich Exactly my thinking.
Also I could see nothing to prevent or restrict public use on foot of the two footways (Way: 198204474 & Way: 198204473).
42016-07-13 20:15:31 UTCBen Harris There's a sign next to each entrance to those paths saying "Private Grounds". I've added source tags to indicate this.
52016-07-14 05:46:45 UTCBCNorwich OK, being remote I couldn't see that.
Just needs the access=private to be removed from the parking bay.
62016-07-14 09:26:23 UTCSCRS The title deeds for Sherlock Close show the property boundary bisecting the lay-by. It was not resurfaced by the county council when Sherlock Close was. This lead the residents to believe it is private. Further check will be made.
12016-07-11 15:22:18 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This is a live map seen by the world and therefore not the proper place to do testing and then upload that testing. I see you have now removed one of the unnecessary nodes. Would you please remove the others as well. Thanks.
12016-07-08 18:04:06 UTCBCNorwich Reverted changeset to reinstate proper description of road and remove building connected to same road.
12016-07-06 18:17:32 UTCBCNorwich I changed both names back to the proper English names. Your addition I take it was in your native language, this could be added in the correct manner like the other languages are, name:??=???????
12016-07-05 06:08:12 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've squared up the buildings and pool to make them all look neater (I'm pretty sure they don't all have unsquare angles). This facility is available in the iD editor (select item then "Square the corners of this area").
I also added access=private to ...
12016-06-29 17:37:19 UTCBCNorwich Hi, if you've finished mapping the turbine positions could the untagged grid lines, (Way: 426314996) be removed as they add nothing to the map. If you wish to keep them as your reference they can be saved offline. Regards
12016-06-29 17:16:27 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I removed the duplicated section of Goodmayes Road maintaining your lcn=yes tag.
12016-06-29 06:32:28 UTCBCNorwich Hi, you don't show how the long footpath (Way: 174818288) crosses the two streams, are they crossed by bridges, fords??
12016-06-28 05:52:50 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
There are a few problems with your addition to the OSM database. You placed your new node on top of an existing car park node, (only one will show, the car park).
Everything added to OSM must be verifiable on the ground. The address you used is not for this poi...
12016-06-27 13:01:30 UTCBCNorwich Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. You've somehow removed all tags from two foot-ways and two garden areas. Let me know if you need help fixing it.
22016-07-04 23:51:42 UTCBen Harris I've reinstated the tags, and added access=private which would seem to capture the intent behind these changes, and the situation on the ground.
12016-06-27 07:21:56 UTCBCNorwich Hi I've added the college website and corrected the facility name.
If you wish to add second language descriptions please do so but in the correct way.
12016-06-26 07:57:00 UTCBCNorwich Hi, this cycleway you've added has resulted in a duplication of highways (one on top of another). There was an existing path here which it would have been better to amend rather than adding the duplicate way, then all history would have been retained.
The matter of duplication should be corrected a...
12016-06-26 07:48:37 UTCBCNorwich Hi I have removed duplicated section of way Seven Kings Road
12016-06-26 06:51:40 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Please take a bit of time to understand the basics and good practices of adding data to OSM. Your drawing of these buildings is a bit haphazard to say the least. There's lots of online help to show how to map well and you can always look at how other areas are ma...
12016-06-25 14:36:56 UTCBCNorwich Is it a hairdresser as well? If not then the shop=hairdresser tag should be removed
12016-06-23 13:06:57 UTCBCNorwich Hi, and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've adjusted the tags to suit OSM best practice, that is website, phone, post code and opening hours as per your website. Hope that's OK.
12016-06-18 11:34:33 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The security company you added to the OSM database is just that, retail business or office premises. It is therefore incorrect/misleading to tag it as 'amenity=police'.

Less importantly the accepted way to add telephone numbers is the international standard...
22016-06-22 06:36:50 UTCBCNorwich No response so problems have now been corrected.
12016-06-21 15:30:55 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have removed the Big Ben POI as it is already mapped (POI is in the center of the building), so your mapping is duplication.

The shop=beauty you've placed in the middle of the street, if you want the map to point folk to the shop then it's best to more prec...
12016-06-19 06:12:14 UTCBCNorwich Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
As it is the information is of little use to the database or anyone else. Would it be possible to give more company details, address ect. Maybe draw in the portion of the huge warehouse where the company is situated, even just add the entrance and put your POI on it.
12016-06-16 12:08:03 UTCRobert Whittaker I see you've tagged as "Fritton and St Olaves FP 1", but according to the Statements I have at it should be "Old Parish of Herringfleet FP 1".

However, those statements are...
22016-06-19 05:37:06 UTCBCNorwich I used the name that I would use today to describe the path, it is FP 1 in the parish of Fritton and St Olaves. That path is now in Norfolk in the parish of Fritton and St Olaves. The parish of Herringfleet does not now exist in Norfolk even in part, the part that was in Norfolk is now called Fritto...
32016-06-19 07:38:22 UTCRobert Whittaker I think you're mistaken here. The Definitive Statement is a legal document, and forms part of teh "Definitive Map and Statement" that surveying authorities are required to maintain. Moreover, the online map is not the Definitive Map (it's just a working copy), so the reference to the curre...
12016-06-17 06:21:16 UTCBCNorwich Hi, On some of the designated Quietways you have actually duplicated existing highways. I have rectified the couple I've noticed as duplication's, removing your duplication and then adding the relevant section of original way to the Quietway relation.
The way to add to the relation is to divide the...
12016-06-14 16:36:49 UTCBCNorwich Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see you have deleted the cycle way and presume there was some mistake with that.
You also inadvertently moved the church POI, I have reverted that change so the church is now back where it was originally mapped.
12016-06-10 14:48:31 UTCBCNorwich Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately you have inadvertently made the corner building into a large circular shape. Also dragging out of shape the building lines within it and the building lines to either side.

It might be best to revert the whole changeset and start again, unless you c...
22016-06-14 05:51:54 UTCBCNorwich No response so changeset reverted.
12016-06-13 05:33:26 UTCBCNorwich Hi, is the house number correct?
22016-06-13 07:45:42 UTCAstro*Consulting Many thanks, was indeed wrong. I have corrected the number, am working on this end of the road from the bridge out to the junction and will be qualifying numbers and names as I go along.
32016-06-14 05:40:48 UTCBCNorwich No trouble, if I can help/advise please just ask. One tip, buildings/houses usually have square corners, you can easily square up a whole building so it looks neater in iD by selecting then square corners.
If you're going to be doing a lot of mapping then the JOSM editor is far superior to iD.
42016-06-14 21:43:32 UTCAstro*Consulting Thanks BC, tried JOSM a while back but will pull it down again and work with it a while - Rgds and thanks for your help. Please stay in touch - Andy
12016-06-07 14:19:49 UTCBCNorwich Sorry but the footway through the woods (Kirkwood NR) at the south west end looks like it starts from the railway line.
12016-06-07 11:43:42 UTCBCNorwich Hi, what happens where the cycleway crosses the canal. Is there a bridge there? If so it would greatly help if it was mapped, (routing would then work).
22016-06-07 14:09:33 UTCBCNorwich Hi, on this one the cycleway should have been split and the bridge tag added to the relevant section of way. Otherwise it would be a duplicated way, I've now done this.
32016-06-07 14:15:57 UTCNick-W Its a bit complex - the cycleway is on a ramp and the footway on steps going up in-between. Thanks for straightening out.
12016-06-07 11:47:11 UTCBCNorwich Hi, what happens where the cycleway crosses the canal?
12016-06-07 11:45:22 UTCBCNorwich Hi, what junction is there where the cycleway twice crosses the footway?
12016-06-03 07:21:44 UTCtrigpoint Hi, are you sure this is genuine?
Would a company really expect its employees to stay in a hostel?
Looked like a personal marker to me, does seem to generate them quite frequently.
22016-06-03 10:20:20 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I could not see anything to suggest a fiction. The building name and street exist, it's actually a small block of flats, the research center is not to far away. So give the benefit of any doubt?
32016-06-03 11:23:16 UTCSomeoneElse There's been at least one example (in France) of people "spoofing" armchair mappers into adding inaccurate POIs based on notes. might be entirely genuine, but a genuine local mapper would be able to (a) check that it was, (b) check whether "h...
12016-06-02 18:17:16 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Sorry but I think you are mistaken by thinking the bus-stop name is incorrect and needs changing. That bus-stop name is actually Prairie Street. It is not named after the street it is on but from the bus company designation (Naptan Atco Code). Please inspect the ...
12016-06-02 06:16:45 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap, your changes have nearly all resulted in the misalignment of ways and buildings. Also the deletion of the name from a section of Charing Cross Road. As the inadvertent changes are intertwined it would be best to revert all of the changeset thus being sure to corre...
12016-06-01 06:43:21 UTCBCNorwich Reverted changeset to remove factitious hamlet from middle of Short Street, and replace the deleted traffic hump.
22016-06-01 10:13:30 UTCBCNorwich Strange, user 'grabbitcompk' does not exist.
32016-06-01 10:51:59 UTCSomeoneElse @BCNorwich - probably deleted after I reported it as spam in #osm-dev
12016-06-01 06:11:55 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I've reverted this changeset. It looks like you've inadvertently removed lots of road names.
12016-06-01 06:01:08 UTCBCNorwich Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have replaced the road name you removed as it is the name used on other maps compatible with OSM (OS Streetview), and its the street name used by properties adjacent to the road. It looks like the name removal was a mistake unless you can show otherwise.
12016-05-30 06:12:08 UTCBCNorwich Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Are you sure the house number is 1?
I have drawn and addressed the property in where your POI is located. If this is where the shop is the two can be consolidated, please confirm?
22016-05-30 11:08:35 UTCMik Pitt Hi. No, it's not 1, but I had to put something in. The property doesn't actually have a number. It's named "Byways", so your mapping is correct. Hope this helps to clarify. Thanks
32016-05-30 11:12:27 UTCMik Pitt Full postal address
PE30 3AY
12016-05-28 06:22:33 UTCBCNorwich Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It looks like you inadvertently made addition to the live OSM map/database. This added nothing but unfortunately did dragged two other highways out of alignment. I have reverted these changes so the map/database is now back as it was.
May I remind that the map is l...
12016-05-28 06:01:20 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I've added the POI to the building to avoid duplication of info. Plus added a few details and corrected the building shape.
12016-05-28 05:49:04 UTCBCNorwich Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It looks like you've placed Domino's on a car park. Features on OSM must be verifiable on the ground. Could you be more precise in positioning this POI, you could also include other details like address, website and phone. Regards
12016-05-27 05:57:29 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Features added to the OSM database must be verifiable on the ground. I don't think "pelvic" meets this requirement and therefore should be amended or removed. This site looks like a domestic dwelling so could not be described as leisure=common.
I aw...
12016-05-25 05:34:24 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see your first addition to the OSM database. The node looks as if it is in a field behind a residential area. May I remind that features on OSM must be verifiable on the ground. Although there may be some merit in the added feature in this position and tagged s...
12016-05-24 19:19:40 UTCBCNorwich Hello There, The updated building looks like it has several addresses but the single address you have added is to the whole block. As such the data is incorrect and should not be added to OSM in this manner. Much better to terrace the building then add addresses to the individual dwellings. Regards
12016-05-24 16:37:54 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Can your new POI be actually determined at the place you have put it? Features must be verifiable on the ground in order to be acceptable to OSM. If you can affirm this then it would be good to put full details and the address in on the OSM database.
As at the ...
12016-05-23 06:12:21 UTCBCNorwich Lots of duplicated fences around here, dividing fences between two properties I would think only use one fence not two on top of each other.
22016-05-31 13:44:29 UTCDavidacious Agreed (though for the avoidance of doubt, note the gap I added between 8a and 10 is a real gap - there's something a bit odd about the garden layouts here, I think an old secondary access route).
12016-05-23 05:55:11 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your added POI is already mapped with lots of information, it is therefore a duplication and actually adds no benefit to OSM. So I have reverted it.
There is still much to map in London so please don't give up, just check a bit closer.
12016-05-21 14:07:31 UTCBCNorwich Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The address for the cathedral on the official website is :-
The Chapter House,
St Paul's Churchyard,
Not St Paul's Church Yard.
The opening times (again from the official website) vary from day to day throughout any given month. Sight seeing...
12016-05-16 16:55:20 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately your addition to the map results in several ways now being duplicated. Is there really a highway named Primrose Hill SRA that describes a large circle crossing the river twice? This new (I think fictitious), highway disrupts routeing software. Would...
22016-05-18 11:36:26 UTCBCNorwich No response after comment and email so reverted changeset to remove duplicate ways
12016-05-11 05:42:24 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
From looking at properties at 50 New Road (several apartments with address as Cookes Lodge, New Road, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex), I am led to believe that the name Cookes Lodge should be applied to the apartment building number 50 New Road. The service road may we...
12016-05-09 19:55:34 UTCMike Baggaley Hi, ER6 is not the name of a highway. I have assumed this is the local reference for a footpath, so have moved it to the loc_ref field.
22016-05-10 05:52:32 UTCBCNorwich Hi, my main concern here was that a new highway (that footpath) was placed atop an existing one which was wrongly tagged as highway=service. I corrected this.

I do notice that relatively new mapper joejwall has added numerous way names in this manner, also naming paths and tracks as name=Path and...
12016-05-09 05:41:58 UTCBCNorwich Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Are you sure you have positioned the Rose & Crown hostel correctly? There is a Rose & Crown pub with hostel above mapped at 65 Union Street, just south of the railway from your POI. If you need any help just ask.
12016-05-03 06:06:40 UTCBCNorwich Hi, barrier=stile feature should be connected to a way/path. Thus indicating the way/path that the stile is a barrier to.
12016-05-02 13:46:52 UTCBCNorwich Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You have added your company POI in the middle of the street. I'm sure your office is not actually there, (it is actually at the other end of the road). Features mapped to OSM must be verifiable on the ground.

From your website it seems you are reluctant to give an a...
12016-05-01 06:45:22 UTCBCNorwich Hi, You forgot to tag Way: 413186334
12016-05-01 06:43:18 UTCBCNorwich Hi, You forgot to tag Way: 409785250
12016-04-26 07:28:03 UTCBCNorwich Hi, you have added your company POI in the middle of the street. I'm sure you office is not actually there. features mapped to OSM must be verifiable on the ground.

From your website it seems you are reluctant to give an actual address for the company. Thus the company's physical position cannot ...
12016-04-17 14:30:56 UTCBCNorwich Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. The hotel you added to the map is not in the middle of the highway. Secondly it has already been mapped. I have therefore removed the duplication. Thanks very much for trying to add to the map, regards
12016-04-16 18:10:49 UTCBCNorwich Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your additions don't make any sense, are you just seeing what happens?
Please be aware aware that this is a live worldwide map and such actions though they may be inadvertent disrupt the integrity of the OSM database. Your features should be deleted would you like ...
12016-04-15 06:08:53 UTCBCNorwich Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I notice the gate you added is not attached to or part of the footway. Nor is it placed as a barrier to Spa Fields. As such it serves no real purpose in the database and will be ignored by routeing software. I see also you intended to show an access condition on the gat...
22016-04-15 10:05:41 UTClionandoil Apologies, my intention was actually to add the gate to the existing node between the highway and footpath (18672679), not create a new node. iD kind of suggested to me that that's what I'd done, but I suppose I'll give it another go with Potlatch. Thanks for flagging it up! (also not 100% sure what...
32016-04-15 11:17:34 UTCBCNorwich Gate is now properly connected to the highway, thanks, well done.
12016-04-13 18:21:34 UTCBCNorwich Welcome to OpenStreetMap, we are a live map used by many people worldwide. This is not therefore a place to test things. I hope you can therefore understand that your test should be removed.
The feature does actually have a name anyway.
12016-04-06 17:53:23 UTCBCNorwich Hello there, welcome to OpenStreetMap, is the car rental really in the middle of Bristol Road? Is the name really . as stated? If not could you please either correct or remove the POI node.
12016-04-05 19:21:01 UTCBCNorwich
The tower will no show as you have tagged it. Correct tags are :-

Please remove the tags :-
They serve no purpose.
12016-04-04 21:10:12 UTCRobert Whittaker As far as I can see, this changeset changed from designation=restricted_byway to designation=byway_open_to_all_traffic.

The data I have at says this route is Wacton RB 17. Has the ...
22016-04-05 06:04:08 UTCBCNorwich Hello Robert, new mapper
changed a whole bunch of ways to BOATS, (he got his info from an old map source which could well have then correctly marked these ways as BOAT's or RUPP's). I emailed him pointing out the problems and we agreed that I revert all his ch...
12016-04-04 13:59:00 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenstreetMap. Your addition of Plazoleta Del Arroyo is incomplete as there is only a name, no description of the feature, the database thus does not recognize it as a feature. I removed the full stop from it.

I have reverted the addition of the untagged way and the way tagge...
12016-04-04 13:22:34 UTCBCNorwich Hi, Welldone and welcome to OpenStreetMap, Just made the opening times fit OSM's method, added website and phone number.
22016-04-04 13:31:59 UTCSomeoneElse I don't think Fitzbillies is a really restaurant though is it? It's a while since I've been there, but I'd have always categorised it as "quite an expensive cafe, catering to Cambridge's extensive tourist trade"
If you want to separate values (e.g. "cuisine" I'd suggest using s...
32016-04-05 13:13:31 UTCSK53 Certainly an expensive cafe last time I was in there even in it's new form (i.e., since the original place folded).
12016-03-29 13:17:24 UTCBCNorwich Hello. If there is a physical well on the common then it is better described as a feature by the tag "man_made=well", this will convey the information to the rest of the world. If the well is named "Well" all well and good. But a description of the feature should not be used as i...
12016-03-27 14:57:34 UTCBCNorwich There is no public right to drive a vehicle on Hayntons Lane.
22016-03-27 15:03:50 UTCBCNorwich There is no public right to drive a vehicle on Sallow Lane. Sallow Lane is designated by NCC definitive map as a "Public Footpath". There is no evidence that this section of way is named Sallow Way.
12016-03-27 14:02:21 UTCBCNorwich Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "...
22016-03-27 14:24:37 UTCBCNorwich This is a byway restricted to use by foot and by horse. The surface is grass not bare ground. The restriction is to motorized traffic therefore vehicle=no is the tag, there may be agricultural vehicle use by the owner. It is thus a bridleway rather than a formal track. The NCC definitive map designa...
12016-03-27 14:15:50 UTCBCNorwich Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "...
12016-03-27 14:14:45 UTCBCNorwich Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "...
12016-03-27 14:13:44 UTCBCNorwich No evidence of public vehicle use here
12016-03-27 14:11:44 UTCBCNorwich Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "...
12016-03-27 14:09:59 UTCBCNorwich Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "...
12016-03-27 14:05:43 UTCBCNorwich Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "...
12016-03-27 14:03:20 UTCBCNorwich Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "...
12016-03-27 14:03:04 UTCBCNorwich Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "...
12016-03-27 14:02:09 UTCBCNorwich Hello, Welcome to OpenStreertMap.
Acknowledging that you are new to OSM may I politely point out that the changes you are making to Rights of Ways in Wacton are wrong. Some statements you make are contradictory, you need to better study the NCC interactive map, Most if not all changes are not "...
12016-03-26 14:32:19 UTCBCNorwich Hi, just wanted to let you know that the footpath does not join to Toot Hill Road to the south. Was it supposed to?
12016-03-20 07:13:14 UTCBCNorwich Hello there, well done on adding to OpenStreetMap and welcome to OSM. The data added was actually duplicated on the node (POI) and the building. I have taken the liberty of drawing the whole building and placing your data. Small tweaks to the data are phone number (+44 2083 051060 is usual OSM manne...
22016-03-20 16:51:28 UTCchillly Sadly it seems BCNorwich has just steamrollered over your work and shown what an expert editor he is regardless of how you are trying to learn.

@BCNorwich: What source did you use to establish which building in the terrace to put the opticians on?
12016-03-01 09:47:56 UTCBCNorwich Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see that there is no physical presence of the stated company at the point you have mapped inside the park Islington Green.
As such this feature is not verifiable on the ground at that point, it is therefore a fiction at that point. Would you like to move it t...
22016-03-19 07:47:52 UTCBCNorwich No response so node removed.
12016-03-10 08:32:22 UTCBCNorwich Hi, You have now duplicated the way alongside the river. There is now the original public footpath over which bicycles are allowed. Plus your new cycleway which you have not tagged for foot use. For a considerable length these two ways are on top of each other. Makes a real mess of routing!

Is th...
12016-03-10 08:28:59 UTCBCNorwich Hi, You have now duplicated the way alongside the river. There is now the original public footpath over which bicycles are allowed. Plus your new cycleway which you have not tagged for foot use. For a considerable length these two ways are on top of each other. Makes a real mess of routing!

Is th...
12016-03-10 07:53:17 UTCBCNorwich You must be mistaken it is a Public Footpath through fields. I have removed your new highway which in any case was a duplication.
12016-03-09 12:21:50 UTCBCNorwich Hello There, unfortunately you have inadvertently made two of the buildings in that block into circles. It would be best to revert the changes you made and start again. If you wish I can revert your changes for you and you can add agian your business. Or if you can tell me the position of your busin...
22016-03-10 07:11:45 UTCBCNorwich I have removed the circles, but may I remark that your name is on two of the buildings.
12016-03-02 07:42:31 UTCBCNorwich Is it really one way, I can't see anything to suggest this from Bishops way junction.

22016-03-03 13:08:47 UTCOBailey I live there and its all one way, theres a not left turn sign at the end of bishops way
32016-03-03 13:09:56 UTCOBailey i was wrong
42016-03-03 15:19:49 UTCBCNorwich Hi, no disrespect intended but can you make a clearer statement? Is Sewardstone Road onewway? Or not? Or which part is oneway? I have made the section of Sewardstone Road between Bishops Way and Approach Way oneway going SE.

52016-03-03 15:22:37 UTCBCNorwich I see I didn't make it clear, that I'm talking about the residential section not the secondary section of Sewardstone Road.
62016-03-03 18:25:23 UTCBCNorwich I 'm sorry, I hadn't refreshed my screen, I can now see you've removed the oneway. Many thanks!
12016-03-02 18:48:51 UTCBCNorwich Hi, from your website I think you have placed this POI in the wrong place. I have corrected the opening times to conform with OpenStreetMap practices. Regards
12016-02-25 14:49:14 UTCBCNorwich Hi, I removed duplicate features. A few descriptive nodes inside of areas with the same description, (pub, hospital and car shop).
12016-02-17 20:15:19 UTCBCNorwich Hi, your change-set added numerous untagged ways duplicating existing ways. I think you must have inadvertently done this so I have reverted the additions. The map is now back as it was so no harm done. Please read up a bit before adding features to the map. Your editing is to a live map and it's ve...
12016-02-14 07:21:02 UTCBCNorwich Hi, There are now two outlines for the park, and one outline duplicates itself by going round twice. so in fact three circuits of the park in total. May I also suggest that the park does not extend to the center line of the surrounding roads and that it should be mapped to it's physical boundary. Re...
22016-02-15 07:32:09 UTCPlaneMad Poornima, I have removed the duplicate park, please check if it looks ok.
32016-02-15 14:09:37 UTCpoornibadrinath Thank you so much :) I will look into it :)
12016-02-12 17:11:42 UTCBCNorwich Hi, The building is still there so there was no need to remove it. Someone might come along and put it back. So the best thing to do is remove all detail specific to the business and then put on a note=vacant tag or note=music shop closed now shop unknown.
22016-02-12 17:44:42 UTCEtaoin Shrdlu Ok, thanks, that's useful to know, but in this case the building was never "theirs" - it's an old tobacco warehouse, and probably now occupied by someone else. Shunt only rented it for about a year; it wouldn't make any sense to label it as "Shunt" today. That said, it did strike...
32016-02-12 19:30:30 UTCtrigpoint If you simply delete the tags associated with Shunt nightclub, leaving the building tags anyone then looking at the history of the building will see the earlier versions and that it once was Shunt nightclub.
The best way to achieve this is to first revert the deletion and then remove the tags. Do y...
42016-02-13 08:14:11 UTCEtaoin Shrdlu Ah, NOW I see what you mean! I though all I did was delete the "tag", but I see now the whole building is gone :| My bad. How do I undo a change like that? I went to edit and history but can't find any way to do so. It would be quite easy to redraw the outline but thought I'd check with yo...
52016-02-13 08:17:11 UTCEtaoin Shrdlu Btw - I've been using the web editor (iD?) to do my edits.
62016-02-13 08:31:04 UTCBCNorwich Don't know if reverting is possible in iD editor so I've reverted the deletion in with the JOSM editor.
Building is now back as it was with all tags, you can now start again with your modifications. Good luck.
PS I forgot to say "Welcome to OpenStreetMap".
12016-02-09 19:46:37 UTCchillly Hi, Welcome to OSM.

You seem to to be adding walks or rides as an object to OSM. We only add named routes to OSM. We add these as a relation, which is a bit of an advanced edit. It is a way of creating a route out of existing roads, paths, tracks etc, without adding them again.

If the route i...
22016-02-11 08:57:38 UTCBCNorwich There are many added ways mostly duplicated and untagged. A lot connecting to existing features. Unfortunately I have made a couple of corrections before realising the extent of the problem. Would it be best to revert this changeset? Not by me as there are to many conflicts.
32016-02-11 09:35:43 UTCSomeoneElse Hi - I've reverted this in (no conflicts - I was prompted to do so to investigate the conflicts BCNorwich might have been getting above).

@Robin653 one thing that was missing from many of the footpaths that you added routes over the top of was the d...
42016-02-11 09:55:17 UTCBCNorwich Many Thanks, looks good now.
12016-02-05 19:22:46 UTCBCNorwich Can the Dream Shed be verified on the ground by anyone visiting the site? If not then it should not be included on OSM.
If it is in fact a shed then it should be tagged building=shed and the name should be the actual proper name.
12016-01-21 12:19:43 UTCBCNorwich With respect, moorland should be tagged as moorland, and not be tagged as heath to suit the renderer even if it looks wrong. To do such tagging is to corrupt the database.
12016-01-20 07:54:21 UTCBCNorwich Please don't forget this is a live map and not really the place to test out ideas. There is already a Crossrail route relation :- #2956938
22016-01-20 07:56:59 UTCBCNorwich
32016-01-20 08:22:51 UTCChris Mullany Thanks for the crossrail link, and sorry for adding unnecessary content: the intention was to turn this into the full route but there's no need now. I'll remove this one.
12016-01-19 20:10:44 UTCRobert Whittaker Way is currently tagged as designation=public_bridleway, but I don't think it appears on the Definitive Map and the only access tag is foot=permissive. Should it be e.g. designation=permissive_bridleway instead?
22016-01-19 21:04:51 UTCBCNorwich Just found out again that I can't reply to the email notification, should be a warning!!
Hello Robert,
I haven't been that way for a while but I do remember the path. There are a few GPS traces for the way. The section of wide grassy track between the field and the hedge/ditch has been permissivel...
12016-01-17 07:37:59 UTCBCNorwich Test comment
22016-01-17 08:08:44 UTCBCNorwich second test
32016-01-17 11:52:24 UTCSomeoneElse I don't think you'll get mails for comments on your own changesets. You will, I suspect, get this one :)
42016-01-17 14:48:04 UTCBCNorwich Hi, correct.
I had seen your query about these comments and wondered if I would get notification by commenting on a comment. I didn't.
What I would like is notification of, or a way to get a list of, the comments I make on other folks changesets.
52016-01-17 14:52:42 UTCSomeoneElse There's not an API for that either as far as I'm aware. You're not the first person who's wondered about it. There is , which allows you to throw the changeset dump at a database and then do things with it, but I've not tried it. There's http://resultmaps.nei...
12016-01-16 19:26:14 UTCBCNorwich Regarding the northern feature. Not quite finished I think, and not enough info to guess what was intended.
22016-01-17 07:18:25 UTCGlucosamine Not sure which feature you mean - perhaps you could identify it more exactly so I can have another look?
32016-01-17 07:26:25 UTCBCNorwich Hi, the northern of the two features, Way: 391197182 just tagged as area, outline also has self intersection.
42016-01-17 07:56:33 UTCGlucosamine Thankyou - found it now - and I do now remember mapping hanging on me at this point. I have now deleted area and replaced it with a new wood shape. Thankyou for picking this up.
12016-01-16 19:33:01 UTCBCNorwich Hi, are the tags on Way: 238287403 correct? I wondered why a helipad was included in a highway=footway area.
22016-01-17 09:24:47 UTCpmailkeey If you look to the NW you'll see the 'General' Hospital (now Children's hospital) it's the helipad for that.
12016-01-15 13:52:29 UTCBCNorwich Added building, driveway and a bit more info.
12016-01-15 13:38:31 UTCBCNorwich Hi, with respect I think this changeset is also a mistake. It certainly has no relevance to the OSM database and unless you can explain it it should be removed, Regards
22016-01-15 14:47:00 UTCRaym0nd Thanks BCNorwich.
I created the map using an extension to the OSM to provide an indoor sketch of the building, but clearly, it was not really good and I decided to take it away.
12016-01-15 13:23:09 UTCBCNorwich Hello, If access through the gates to Royal Close and Collinson place is access=private then I would expect the roads beyond the gates to also be access=private. So the two ways should be tagged a such. Regards
12016-01-14 09:24:12 UTCPeter Mead Thank you. I didn't spot that error. I'm trying a new technique for creating the building outlines.
22016-01-14 19:39:06 UTCBCNorwich Hi, no problem, glad to help. Couple of good guides for building outlines are:-
and :-
32016-01-15 13:58:43 UTCPeter Mead Yes, I'd read that first link a few weeks ago. Merging intersecting ways seems quicker. Mapping each address as a separate way makes it a little more complicated though.
12016-01-10 08:02:20 UTCBCNorwich Hi, just wanted to let you know you've somehow dragged several nodes and made self intersections on the outline of the construction land. Do you want to redraw it or shall I try to revert the changes.
22016-01-10 09:13:10 UTCRMC1461 I will amend it when I get on PC later on today. Thanks I'm still quite new at this.
12016-01-01 08:40:14 UTCBCNorwich Are the areas tagged as heath really heath lands? As far as I am aware these are fells and should be tagged natural=fell.
12015-12-24 18:19:15 UTCBCNorwich Hi, surely the cycleway going through buildings from Leighfield Road is not supposed to duplicate the foot-way. Is it meant to be a shared cycle/foot way?
12015-12-17 15:56:38 UTCBCNorwich Quite a lot of mistakes made here on the forest areas. Lots of single untagged nodes all over the place. looks like a lot of parts of areas have been deleted.
12015-12-14 21:25:24 UTCSomeoneElse Something's gone a bit wrong here. You've added , but it looks like a duplicate of the already-existing .
22015-12-15 07:01:02 UTCBCNorwich Thank you for pointing this out.
My mistake, it was a duplicate node, both were on the same spot by the same mapper. I separated them to make sure all tags were on the remaining node. Then inadvertently forgot to remove the duplicate which is now removed.
12015-12-13 13:04:19 UTCBCNorwich I have tweaked your new school area and removed the duplicate school area keeping all relevant tags on the one area.
12015-12-13 13:02:34 UTCBCNorwich I have redrawn the areas because you inadvertently had several self intersections and had moved the outlines of adjacent areas/buildings. I have also removed the building, car park and roads you inadvertently left under the new building.
12015-12-13 12:59:46 UTCBCNorwich I have deleted the duplicate car park area and placed all relevant tags including your new name tag on the one area.
12015-12-13 12:58:02 UTCBCNorwich You only need one amenity=school tag for the school. I have removed the two or three extra ones. When several buildings/areas make up a school it's usual to place all the main tags on the overall area which you have done.
12015-12-13 11:54:59 UTCBCNorwich RILD building does not look right and there is a self intersection of the outline.
22015-12-17 14:03:03 UTCandygates Good spot. I've corrected the intersection and I'll snap the site map to get a better RILD - this was from when it was a building site!
12015-12-12 14:33:22 UTCBCNorwich From the Bing image these are buildings but none are tagged as buildings. The buildings should be conventionally tagged so that they can be rendered properly.
Sorry but it looks like you've done a lot of mapping like this. The buildings can be seen in your JOSM editor but none of the building show ...
12015-12-12 14:26:25 UTCBCNorwich From the Bing image these are buildings but none are tagged as buildings. The buildings should be conventionally tagged so that they can be rendered properly.
12015-12-12 14:21:50 UTCBCNorwich From the Bing image these are buildings but none are tagged as buildings. Also there are hundreds of single untagged node beneath the building nodes.
The buildings should be conventionally tagged so that they can be rendered properly. The single nodes should be removed
12015-12-01 10:21:32 UTCBCNorwich Duplicate section of roundabout :- Way: 220524955
Needs looking at before removal to keep all relations whole.
12015-11-24 08:07:02 UTCBCNorwich Hi, you have to be very careful to check your edits. You broke Thickthorn roundabout by somehow disconnecting two nodes. I've fixed it. Regards
22015-11-24 21:19:32 UTCnizmo My understanding was that this have already been fixed by another user
32015-11-25 07:29:29 UTCBCNorwich Hello, I can't see where anything was fixed after your last edit. But I can only comment on what was there when I looked at correcting a routing problem. I found that way 54240537 was disconnected from way 54110777 at node 3776403450 , the two way end nodes shared the same position exactly (one on-t...
12015-11-24 08:15:54 UTCBCNorwich Hi, this large area of land is not a building? I don't think its a church either? Could you check and correct if necessary?
22015-11-24 21:23:25 UTCnizmo A work colleague is part of the church, the church section it is currently undergoing construction, but part of the building is already occupied by Hope. I will update to outline just the building.
12015-11-20 22:29:28 UTCSomeoneElse Just for info, this change introduced a gap in the A623 (two bits of that previously joined at ; once that was deleted there was a gap). I've also resolved the "multiple short overlaps" that there were at the junction. I suspect that the intr...
22015-11-21 07:22:09 UTCBCNorwich Thank you, looks OK
12015-11-20 19:16:25 UTCppr9 Might want to review this one as it seems to have gone a bit wrong - you've left a gap in the car park access road and a gap in the NCN51 relation...
22015-11-20 19:38:29 UTCBCNorwich Thanks for the tip off. Reverted change-set and removed the duplicate cycle-way section again.
12015-11-08 14:32:55 UTCrobert Did you mean to remove the name "Midbrook Court" in this changeset? It's broken a match against OS Locator:
22015-11-08 15:06:07 UTCBCNorwich Sorted and email explanation sent.
12015-10-27 13:15:42 UTCBCNorwich Email sent explaining the problems with this changeset.
12015-09-02 16:38:39 UTCrobbieonsea How does a single node (3713970949) intersect with itself?
At least you've recreated it. But deleting it and recreating seems unnecessary...
22015-09-02 18:16:47 UTCBCNorwich I inadvertently used to comment from my previous change-set, this comment should have been remove extraneous node.
There was an un-tagged node under the place=hamlet node which I removed. I must have accidentally minutely moved the remaining node to cause the history to be lost for which I apologi...
12015-08-08 16:20:22 UTCSomeoneElse Hi, just for info - fixing the self-intersection in left a small gap in the Rutland Round - I've fixed it.
22015-08-08 17:43:29 UTCBCNorwich Sorry I obviously missed that, I do check to keep relations correct/complete. Thank you.
12015-08-02 17:46:01 UTCBCNorwich Hi, you don't make a route relation or add to one by duplicating streets, you add the existing street to the route relation.
12015-08-02 15:24:48 UTCBCNorwich Hi, looks like there's something wrong with the East Finchley Station Buildings.
12015-07-18 16:56:12 UTCBCNorwich Area or linear feature?
12015-06-18 11:36:17 UTCSomeoneElse What was the duplicate way that was removed here? It looks like you're editing an area where someone's copied a bunch of stuff from Strava (which may or may not still exist). What remains still looks fairly unfeasible. Also, did you take into account the underlying Bing offset here?
22015-06-18 13:59:55 UTCBCNorwich The duplicate ways that I removed were paths that had literally been placed on top of one-another. Also a path that joined Chestnut Grove then was continued on top of Chestnut Grove to Mount Road
32015-06-19 21:12:47 UTCSomeoneElse Thanks for that - I think I can see what happened now. It was the lack of deleted ways that was confusing me.
12015-06-10 05:53:05 UTCBCNorwich Hello, with respect I think the outline of the Hilton is not the shape on the ground. Perhaps the last edit accidentally aligned the nodes of the main block into a circle. Regards
12015-06-02 19:11:43 UTCGovanus I was wondering how you determined the extension of the estate boundry?
I split the two as both areas are different on the ground and just neighbour each other.
Idon't think you easily reach White cross lane without traveling out over the river on the B4263 first?
22015-06-02 20:02:52 UTCBCNorwich I was as I recall just removing a self intersection, as I recall the area was mapped as one area but like a figure of 8, one continuous way crossing over or joined to itself. If it is meant to be 2 separate areas then it should be mapped as such.
32015-06-02 20:17:35 UTCGovanus ok I just found some evidance for the link but the area is bigger and nammed as a different district, so a boundy shape tagging needs seperating from the landuse?
42015-06-02 20:43:34 UTCGovanus sorry page update missed your reply. I´ll talk to some local residents and continue to sort out the schools there. I think I just hyjacked someones land use and cut it to fit the district nammed after the main road in and the Hall at the centre which owned the whole estate originally. I thin...
12015-04-22 07:15:45 UTCBCNorwich Passing place not linked to a highway. I joined it to the highway otherwise it's ignored and no use.
12014-12-25 08:25:11 UTCBCNorwich Hi, is the proper name/title for the toilets really "Sparhawk park toilets" or is this your description? If not a proper name then it should not be name= tagged such, rather put in a note. Regards.
12014-11-25 11:41:03 UTCBCNorwich Do the fences really go through the houses? If not shouldn't they be corrected? I've done a few.
12014-11-20 15:36:32 UTCBCNorwich Hello, your questions ( have been answered. Your test can now be removed from the map as it is in serious error. The live map is not really the place for testing/experimenting.
12014-11-17 08:57:35 UTCBCNorwich Are there really two fences (on top of each other) between the gardens, and do the fences (both of them) really go through the middle of joined houses.
12014-11-12 07:36:28 UTCBCNorwich I removed the self intersection from the residential, from the Bing image it looks like a great amount of this area in not residential, IMHO.
BCNorwich has contributed to 491 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 785 comment(s)