BCNorwich participated in the following changeset discussionsBCNorwich participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168923269 by Nia20 @ 2025-07-14 15:22 | 1 | 2025-07-15 06:08 | BCNorwich | Hi, Sorry to inform you that the footpaths placed on top of existing highways is duplication of a highway, which could cause disruption of routing. Please, if a way needs correcting/amending it's OSM best practice to correct the existing way, thus the way's history is maintained and routin... |
| 2 | 2025-07-15 08:53 | Nia20 ♦2 | Thanks Bernard! That's good to know. I'll do so in future, and thanks for correcting the duplication :)all the best,Nia | |
| 168799230 by likhithakotari @ 2025-07-11 14:17 | 1 | 2025-07-12 05:30 | BCNorwich | Reverted to remove duplicated highway. |
| 168755842 by Chlxrb123* @ 2025-07-10 18:16 | 1 | 2025-07-11 04:12 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reverted this changeset because it dragged highways out of position. This could have disrupted routing.Regards Bernard. |
| 168680215 by Sravya_Tummuru @ 2025-07-09 07:16 | 1 | 2025-07-10 04:36 | BCNorwich | Fiction removed and highway placement reinstated. |
| 168571150 by philipcullen @ 2025-07-06 17:15 | 1 | 2025-07-07 05:21 | BCNorwich | Hi, Several of your new residential were mapped on top of existing residential areas in very strange shapes. A couple of other areas were dragged out of shape. I've removed the problems, and the map looks OK now.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2025-07-07 18:11 | philipcullen ♦9 | I hadn't intended to create any new residential areas - I think I've managed to trigger a bug in a JOSM plugin that's modified them when splitting buildings (it crashed a couple of times whilst editing). Thanks for putting it right. | |
| 168538853 by HaloDogs @ 2025-07-05 20:44 | 1 | 2025-07-06 05:34 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The tag leisure=park infers a park open to the public for recreation, which I don't think these are. Thus, I've removed those two tags. I've added the tag leisure=dog_park to the POI in the area that looks like the dog park.Regards Bernard. |
| 168472259 by Muttabonda43 @ 2025-07-04 07:08 | 1 | 2025-07-05 05:23 | BCNorwich | Hi. Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunatly you new highways included some that were duplications of existing highways, Way: 1412126937, Way: 1412126936 and Way: 1412126948. I've removed these duplications as they could cause disruption to routing. I've also made several corrections/amen... |
| 168446869 by Pranav Yaligouda @ 2025-07-03 14:24 | 1 | 2025-07-04 05:14 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately several sections of your highways were duplicated, which I've now removed. Please don't place a highway section on top of any other highway; it could disrupt routing.Regards Bernard. |
| 168429901 by thermopestbedbug @ 2025-07-03 06:50 | 1 | 2025-07-03 08:42 | BCNorwich | Hi, The website link diesn't work, I've removed it. |
| 168322954 by jajanja3 @ 2025-06-30 18:48 | 1 | 2025-07-02 05:33 | BCNorwich | Fictional bridge removed, Way:1410976204. |
| 168301552 by Ofoyrwoth @ 2025-06-30 09:57 | 1 | 2025-07-01 04:06 | BCNorwich | Hi, Only formal verifiable names should be used, thus I've removed names.Also building should not cross over each other. Buildings are better/neater when squared up.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-07-02 08:03 | Ofoyrwoth ♦1 | Thanks | |
| 168276984 by martinwill @ 2025-06-29 18:08 | 1 | 2025-06-30 04:20 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The street address is simply Quebec Way. I've amended.Regards Bernard. |
| 168201191 by Mark__E @ 2025-06-27 19:15 | 1 | 2025-06-28 05:43 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It is likely that the first mapper of the path was aware that bicycles were not permitted. Also the landowner might not want cycling on their land. Therefore, unless you to definitely know that bicycles are allowed then the tag should remain. Routers don't alway... |
| 168171500 by abdul samad shah @ 2025-06-27 07:44 | 1 | 2025-06-28 05:22 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 168192884 by Brent Parks Forum @ 2025-06-27 15:54 | 1 | 2025-06-27 18:17 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.There's no point in putting the addresses on every pitch. An appropriate place for an address might be the hall. The names all seem to be fiction. OSM only uses formal, verifiable names not descriptions.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-06-27 21:05 | Brent Parks Forum ♦2 | Removed descriptions from titles. The two names Tenterden and John Billam are accurate listed on the Council Sports Fields website pages, and on the London Parks and Gardens Trust Inventory. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-27 21:08 | Brent Parks Forum ♦2 | The missing pitches are very important and the map was used by CPRE London for their comments on the new draft London Plan. The playing fields were bequeathed for sports in c. 1925. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-27 21:10 | Brent Parks Forum ♦2 | Google maps - has a notation for the Historically Registered fields. This can be misinterpreted - therefore the demarcation of the pitches is essential. | |
| 168146119 by Alan Bond @ 2025-06-26 15:43 | 1 | 2025-06-26 16:58 | BCNorwich | Hi, This path is also a PRoW, tags added.Regards Bernard. |
| 168145685 by Alan Bond @ 2025-06-26 15:34 | 1 | 2025-06-26 16:55 | BCNorwich | Hi, Yes this one is a Public Footpath, I've added the tags. |
| 168055813 by Sandali Fernando @ 2025-06-24 15:47 | 1 | 2025-06-25 05:17 | BCNorwich | Hi, Please stop duplicating existing highways, it could disrupt routing. If any existing way needs amending or correcting, it's OSM practice to amend or correct the existing way, not just map over it.Duplicated highway removed.Regards Bernard. |
| 168057146 by Sandali Fernando @ 2025-06-24 16:19 | 1 | 2025-06-25 05:12 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 168044318 by Sandali Fernando @ 2025-06-24 11:26 | 1 | 2025-06-25 05:08 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 168043424 by Sandali Fernando @ 2025-06-24 11:04 | 1 | 2025-06-25 05:08 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 168043109 by Sandali Fernando @ 2025-06-24 10:55 | 1 | 2025-06-25 05:06 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 168042007 by hf0 @ 2025-06-24 10:27 | 1 | 2025-06-24 11:48 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The barracks are already fully mapped with this outline:- Way: Robertson Barracks (107382014), https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107382014Thus, your new outline is inadvertent duplication, so I've removed it.Regards Bernard. |
| 167965658 by harryeddy3 @ 2025-06-22 16:11 | 1 | 2025-06-23 05:47 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed the untagged Way: 1408604416 because it has self-intersections, is mainly placed on the center line of highways, (land areas don't usually extend to the centerlines of highways).I've previously unjoined several sections of farmland areas from the centerline of tra... |
| 2 | 2025-06-23 08:16 | harryeddy3 ♦1 | Thanks, I can't see/remember exactly which one that was but I'll try and be more careful | |
| 3 | 2025-06-24 05:07 | BCNorwich | Hi, Please have a look at this farmland area:- Way: 1408604413. It has several self-intersections, making it not a true outline.I also see narrow margins between land areas, ie between Way: 1408604413 and Way: 1396818871. These areas would join at the common boundary, (usually the hedge line), ... | |
| 4 | 2025-06-24 06:52 | BCNorwich | Self-intersections can be seen here:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-5.27545&lat=50.21307&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way | |
| 5 | 2025-06-24 07:34 | harryeddy3 ♦1 | Thanks, I can correct at some point if you don't. Useful website, thanks. At one point I was thinking of tagging that stupid as scrub as often it's a pretty permanent area the farmer leaves for biodiversity incentives and ease of machinery but I asked the discord and they thought it was mo... | |
| 6 | 2025-06-25 12:00 | harryeddy3 ♦1 | I've updated them - hopefully they're better now. Someone else previously completed the hedges in the area so without surveying it myself I haven't altered the hedgelines based off aerial imagery. In some spots they look more like trees than actual cornish hedges to me but if I get a ... | |
| 167963221 by Chas Nel @ 2025-06-22 15:13 | 1 | 2025-06-23 18:43 | BCNorwich | access=no is incorrect on highways that that do allow some public access it's illogical. I've removed the tags. |
| 167995343 by BenBrodie_MJGLEESON @ 2025-06-23 10:14 | 1 | 2025-06-23 13:17 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've reverted the change reinstating the original pitch and add your info to it. Thus all the features history is maintained. I removed the generic name, OSM uses formal verifiable names.Regards Bernard. |
| 167952123 by Kamel Labiad @ 2025-06-22 11:18 | 1 | 2025-06-22 15:57 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Replaced a tree to its original position and two area outlines. Corrected spelling of platform.Regards Bernard. |
| 167886139 by Chas Nel @ 2025-06-20 19:30 | 1 | 2025-06-22 06:11 | BCNorwich | Hi, Access to public footpaths is not permissive, it's a designated right. I've made lots of amendments.Regards Bernard. |
| 167629441 by Chas Nel @ 2025-06-14 21:10 | 1 | 2025-06-22 05:44 | BCNorwich | Fiction monorail stop tags removed from Node: 286719707 |
| 167918283 by jonnywindows @ 2025-06-21 15:13 | 1 | 2025-06-21 17:24 | BCNorwich | I've squared up the buildings |
| 167917823 by jonnywindows @ 2025-06-21 15:02 | 1 | 2025-06-21 17:13 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed '1 Swinley Close' from the name tag as it's not a formal name.Regards Bernard. |
| 167500204 by NTTrailsSW @ 2025-06-11 16:42 | 1 | 2025-06-12 05:43 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed the 2 highways, Way: 1392695104 and Way: 1394219759 because they duplicated existing highways. I've made changes to the bridge Way: 303336532 to better reflect it withe the route.I've removed the fixme tag on Node: 3076907462.You've amended the tags to a ... |
| 2 | 2025-06-21 08:18 | BCNorwich | Hi, Can you please rectify or remove the stile. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-23 11:56 | NTTrailsSW ♦1 | Hi Bernard, apologies for the delay I've been away. Thanks for highlighting the stile, I've now corrected its location so as not to be on the junction of 3 ways. | |
| 167883400 by BANS_MAPS @ 2025-06-20 18:23 | 1 | 2025-06-21 05:31 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The buildings look much better when squared up, the shortcut to square up is 'Q'.Regards Bernard. |
| 167817293 by KRIVESH M K @ 2025-06-19 09:47 | 1 | 2025-06-20 05:24 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You've added a footpath which is placed on top of an existing highway and is also on top of a building. Such duplication could disrupt routing, thus I've removed it.Unless your route is verifiable as per OSM practice (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik... |
| 160674306 by Rigi03 @ 2024-12-27 12:35 | 1 | 2025-06-13 04:52 | BCNorwich | Hi, You added Way: 1346617739 but forgot to tag it. Could you please apply a tag?Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-06-17 04:45 | BCNorwich | No response so tahgged as grass and amend relation | |
| 167672639 by Iam a Good Developer @ 2025-06-16 01:52 | 1 | 2025-06-17 04:36 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highways removed |
| 167629311 by Garnwenshared @ 2025-06-14 21:04 | 1 | 2025-06-16 04:51 | BCNorwich | Hi, Some of the hedge lines were duplicated. |
| 2 | 2025-06-16 05:34 | BCNorwich | There were problems with ways with the same position and gaps in hedges were missing. | |
| 165691739 by JamesCPrentice @ 2025-05-01 19:39 | 1 | 2025-06-15 05:38 | BCNorwich | Hi, I see you added layer= tags to houses on West Hill Road. Do you realise that layer=-10 or any minus layer is underground? Thus I've removed the layer=-? tags. |
| 167499726 by CarterMaps @ 2025-06-11 16:30 | 1 | 2025-06-14 18:07 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.These features would be building=yes, not landuse=residential same as the nearby features. I've amended them. |
| 167064372 by Anglian Wealth Management @ 2025-06-01 18:56 | 1 | 2025-06-02 04:50 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Has the business moved to this site? I don't think so, should these changes be reverted? Do you need help, if so please say?Regards Bernard.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-06-14 06:21 | BCNorwich | No response so I've reverted changes to 119 Boundary Road and mapped AWM to 12 Boundary Road as per the website. | |
| 167490944 by arcus21 @ 2025-06-11 13:04 | 1 | 2025-06-11 15:14 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've added the address and website to the POI. OSM routes to Cranberry Lane very close to the POI. Google Maps take you further north on Cranberry Lane, close to Daisy Road. This is because the POI on Google Maps is incorrectly placed.Regards Bernard |
| 167432073 by Robkoko @ 2025-06-10 08:24 | 1 | 2025-06-10 11:17 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.A couple of querys. Can you add the gates or say where they are situated? Also the tag access=no implies that no means of transport can enter, when vehicles can clearly be seen on imagery and there are houses accessed. Thus I've removed the access=no tag.Reg... |
| 2 | 2025-06-10 17:50 | Robkoko ♦1 | How you can see cars there? If you open streetview on google you cant see this road | |
| 3 | 2025-06-10 17:52 | Robkoko ♦1 | I will try to add it on laptop ,but i am new on this,cca half of the road is public and half has gate and behind this gate somewhere in the middle is another gate,i tried today finnish street on citystrides.com ,but it was not possible cause of this gates,nodes are behind gates | |
| 4 | 2025-06-10 17:58 | BCNorwich | Hi, You can see cars on Google Maps, Maxar, Bing, and Esri imagery. At the east end of Trenham Ave I can see cars in the driveways of the two houses; they must have access. | |
| 5 | 2025-06-10 19:02 | JassKurn ♦154 | If you look on Bing Streetside you can see there Trenham Avenue joins Tyefields by crossing the footway of Tyefields. There is a give way before the footway. An example of an OSM continous crossing?https://www.bing.com/maps?&cp=51.575797~0.515389&lvl=19.83&dir=213.16301&pi=-25.19... | |
| 6 | 2025-06-11 19:48 | Robkoko ♦1 | Ok guys ,at first you can see on google maps cars because part of this road has public access,problem is that there is one gate somewhere in area where word wilsner is finnished,another gate is somewhere where is Letter "T" of Trenham Avenue.Another thing is that this map is incorrect ,bec... | |
| 167443927 by Aisha Baig @ 2025-06-10 13:04 | 1 | 2025-06-10 14:47 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed the school POI. The school tags are all on the school premises outline as per OSM practice. |
| 167443149 by Aisha Baig @ 2025-06-10 12:48 | 1 | 2025-06-10 14:45 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've reverted this changeset to reinstate the residential building. I've added the doctors at the correct building. |
| 167442875 by Aisha Baig @ 2025-06-10 12:42 | 1 | 2025-06-10 14:33 | BCNorwich | Corrections made. |
| 167438688 by Aisha Baig @ 2025-06-10 10:57 | 1 | 2025-06-10 11:59 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The pharmacy was already mapped, so I've removed the second POI.Regards Bernard. |
| 167429007 by FTP Bike fit and Servicing @ 2025-06-10 06:53 | 1 | 2025-06-10 08:04 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've made corrections, please check the shop POI is within the correct house outline. Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-06-10 14:41 | dzidek23 ♦59 | Hi, I too was intrigued by this entry and decided to tidy up a bit an add some info from your website. | |
| 167395881 by NTTrailsLSE @ 2025-06-09 12:40 | 1 | 2025-06-10 04:55 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed these 3 highways as they duplicated existing highways:- Way: 1393532205, Way: 1393532207, Way: 1393532204I've repaired the route relations. Please try not to duplicate highways as it disrupts routing. I'ts also very difficult to correct duplications when routes ar... |
| 2 | 2025-06-11 17:05 | NTTrailsLSE ♦12 | Hello, thanks for flagging as well as repairing the duplicated ways and relations - this was likely made in error while using a handheld device in challenging conditions the field! Please do continue to feedback if you notice anything else awry, but hopefully a one off!Thanks again! NT GIS Team. | |
| 167320126 by N47H @ 2025-06-07 17:14 | 1 | 2025-06-08 05:56 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately there were many instances of features being dragged out of alignment in 2 or 3 of your changesets. I think I've corrected all the anomalies but please check.Please check before uploading to make sure you're not breaking anything. It's... |
| 167220204 by NTTrailsLSE @ 2025-06-05 12:08 | 1 | 2025-06-06 04:53 | BCNorwich | Hi, Way: 1392336183 has been removed as it duplicates an existing highway that has several relations. Duplication could disrupt routing please try to check before uploading. |
| 2 | 2025-06-07 05:48 | BCNorwich | Hi, the section of highway Way: 'old' West Park Drive (1392336182) has been removed as it duplicates an existing highway that has several relations. Duplication could disrupt routing please try to check before uploading. | |
| 167278276 by Mr Andrew Radford @ 2025-06-06 17:27 | 1 | 2025-06-07 04:52 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see the AED is placed a little way away from the hall building. Could you state where/how it's actually located please? Is it, for example, on the SE wall or in some other location. The more procise you can place it the easier for folk to find it in an emergen... |
| 2 | 2025-06-07 04:53 | BCNorwich | Oh, I've drawn in the hall. | |
| 167153420 by Quality Escorts London @ 2025-06-03 21:32 | 1 | 2025-06-04 04:58 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStretMap.I've reverted your changes because they dragged lots of features out of alignment and introduced data of dubious quality attached to existing genuine features.Please check your editing before uploading.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 06:30 | Quality Escorts London ♦1 | Thanks, and apologies about that | |
| 167126983 by DennisV001 @ 2025-06-03 09:59 | 1 | 2025-06-03 13:13 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Are these residential areas actually built on and occupied? If not yet then they should be tagged as under construction. Also the areas shouldn't overlap.Need help, just ask.Regards Bernard. |
| 156224546 by akshayola @ 2024-09-05 10:40 | 1 | 2025-06-03 06:26 | BCNorwich | Hi, The roads don't go over the buildings, (it's dangerous). Please zoom in and make corrections. You can use the square up tool on the buildings. Regards Bernard. |
| 167087468 by PasinduThambugala @ 2025-06-02 11:22 | 1 | 2025-06-03 06:21 | BCNorwich | Fiction removed, highways amended. |
| 167114520 by PasinduThambugala @ 2025-06-03 02:52 | 1 | 2025-06-03 06:20 | BCNorwich | Fiction removed, highways amended. |
| 167114872 by PasinduThambugala @ 2025-06-03 03:22 | 1 | 2025-06-03 06:12 | BCNorwich | Fiction roads reverted. |
| 167115062 by PasinduThambugala @ 2025-06-03 03:38 | 1 | 2025-06-03 06:11 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've reverted this changeset because it is incorrect and deletes existing features.Regards Bernard. |
| 167104154 by John Wilson Handyman @ 2025-06-02 18:18 | 1 | 2025-06-03 05:04 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your mapped business would not occupy the whole 4 storey building. Also the postcode does not apply to this building. It seems the business address is for an office only. The postcode on the website refers to a house on the spur of Curtis Street.Thus I've ma... |
| 167064739 by Anglian Wealth Management @ 2025-06-01 19:05 | 1 | 2025-06-02 04:54 | BCNorwich | Hi, This is not 12 Boundary Road, I've reverted this changeset.Regards Bernard. |
| 167032812 by Fifi2121 @ 2025-06-01 01:14 | 1 | 2025-06-01 04:55 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I'm sorry to say there are mistakes in each feature you've mapped. I recreation ground is named Goldington Green Park, not field. also formal names are usually capitalised. The park does not need an address.The shops you added are already mapped with th... |
| 166997605 by Vegishake Ltd @ 2025-05-31 05:55 | 1 | 2025-05-31 11:09 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.There are a few things wrong with your mapping. You have the feature mapped at the wrong building, thus I'm reverting the change.It looks like the business you're trying to add is an online shop. Please see this page https://help.openstreetmap.org/ques... |
| 166960281 by Adels Qoku @ 2025-05-30 09:06 | 1 | 2025-05-30 10:40 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reverted this changeset because it dragged Mansell Road out of position. No harm done now but please be careful, if in doubt don't upload changes.Regards Bernard. |
| 166918051 by Deputy Clerk @ 2025-05-29 12:03 | 1 | 2025-05-29 13:36 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've reverted this changeset as it makes Thomas Road a very long gate, I don't think its gated anyway. Another highway had a solar panel dragged onto it.Regards Bernard |
| 166823268 by Welshie @ 2025-05-27 12:13 | 1 | 2025-05-28 06:11 | BCNorwich | Hi, The line of Rushton FP 21 deviates greatly from the line on the definitive map. I think the legal should be mapped and this line tagged as a path line to overcome obstacles. Are there stiles or gaps at the electric fences?Regards Bernard. |
| 166812655 by NTTrailsWLS @ 2025-05-27 08:17 | 1 | 2025-05-28 05:41 | BCNorwich | Hi, You somehow dragged the path Way: 453137260 out of position along with several other paths joined to it. I've reverted that part of this changeset to return the path to the original positions. May I comment that making changes to or adding 66 features over a fairly large area makes it very ... |
| 166735479 by DEVI YASASREE @ 2025-05-25 13:49 | 1 | 2025-05-26 05:49 | BCNorwich | Path removed because that's a bus-only highway. |
| 166739754 by Frxd @ 2025-05-25 15:19 | 1 | 2025-05-25 18:37 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I'm sorry to say that your mapping contains many mistakes, and a few warnings are given above. I've only looked at the first few features in this changeset and see many other mistakes: farmland inside farmland, farmland extending over roads, and some areas ... |
| 166738937 by terrydtruscott @ 2025-05-25 15:05 | 1 | 2025-05-25 18:03 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The tag would be building=bungalow not house=bungalow. I've made the corrections.Regards Bernard. |
| 166629454 by JackFurby @ 2025-05-22 20:39 | 1 | 2025-05-25 05:03 | BCNorwich | Hi. Please don't tag footpaths as layer=-1 when the path is at/on ground level. I've removed several layer=-1 tags, I've added several sections of layer=-1, tunnel=yes where the footpath goes under/through buildings.Regards Bernard. |
| 166622743 by jamesks @ 2025-05-22 17:12 | 1 | 2025-05-24 06:20 | BCNorwich | Duplicated sections removed |
| 166650240 by hammerharry @ 2025-05-23 11:08 | 1 | 2025-05-23 13:28 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I doubt the formal name of this service road is 'k', thus I've removed it.Regards Bernard. |
| 166409204 by reppamrefinoC @ 2025-05-17 21:17 | 1 | 2025-05-21 06:52 | BCNorwich | Duplicated sections of highways, Way: 1387623399 and Way: 1387623398, are removed. |
| 166528990 by RDesV @ 2025-05-20 14:49 | 1 | 2025-05-21 06:46 | BCNorwich | Duplicated sections of highways, Way: 1388263879 and Way: 1388263880 are removed. |
| 166416691 by DEVI YASASREE @ 2025-05-18 06:13 | 1 | 2025-05-20 05:59 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've just removed several of your highways because they duplicate existing highways, this duplication can disrupt routing. |
| 166378794 by AnujY @ 2025-05-17 07:03 | 1 | 2025-05-18 06:47 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed the path Way: 1387440305 because as mapped it duplicates an existing highway line. This could cause disruption to routing.Regards Bernard. |
| 166305087 by Priyanka korhale @ 2025-05-15 13:26 | 1 | 2025-05-16 06:55 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed |
| 166302559 by الاندلس الفاخرة الشريبات @ 2025-05-15 12:34 | 1 | 2025-05-16 06:51 | BCNorwich | Fiction removed. |
| 166082451 by 34_Lies @ 2025-05-10 18:54 | 1 | 2025-05-11 05:01 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The pub is already mapped, so I've included your new info in the pub building outline.Regards Bernard |
| 166019368 by NorthYorkshire @ 2025-05-09 09:42 | 1 | 2025-05-10 05:23 | BCNorwich | Hi, Way: 1385031788 as it duplicates Way: 1384793220 |
| 2 | 2025-05-10 05:57 | BCNorwich | Hi, Way: 1385031791 as it duplicates Way: 1384793223 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-10 06:03 | BCNorwich | Hi, Way: 1385031785 as it duplicates Way: 1384793217 | |
| 166003941 by NorthYorkshire @ 2025-05-08 21:30 | 1 | 2025-05-09 16:41 | DaveF ♦1,566 | Hiif you do any more could you reuse the existing linear platform. Retaining the history of objects is often useful for validation/QA purposes. |
| 2 | 2025-05-10 05:20 | BCNorwich | Hi, Way: 1385031787 removed as it duplicates Way: 1384793219 | |
| 166006537 by Cybest @ 2025-05-09 00:00 | 1 | 2025-05-09 06:14 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.There's four houses in that building. I've made corrections. Please check that it's now correct.Regards Bernard |
| 165971780 by j newell @ 2025-05-08 08:51 | 1 | 2025-05-08 11:17 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've made the area a garden and added the house amending the tags.Regards Bernard. |
| 165899635 by jimbog07 @ 2025-05-06 16:03 | 1 | 2025-05-07 06:18 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed the long track that zig zags across the countryside, which is obviously fictional.Regards Bernard |
| 165899621 by claraclaraclarava @ 2025-05-06 16:03 | 1 | 2025-05-06 18:30 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've moved the bin off the highway center line to the south pavement. I also removed the name tag Thinking that it's more likely a description.Regards Bernard. |
| 165783760 by chtryanil1080 @ 2025-05-04 04:53 | 1 | 2025-05-05 06:11 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately Way: Ramnagar-Devghat Road (1383477051) duplicates existing highways in it's entirety with unjoined crossing highways. This could cause disruption to routing.The highway doesn't look logically correct. Thus I've removed it. If a way n... |
| 165689243 by NTTrailsWLS @ 2025-05-01 18:27 | 1 | 2025-05-03 06:24 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway Way: 1382828809 removed. |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 06:11 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed several more duplicated sections of highways: Way: 1382828815, Way: 1382828798, part of Way: 608428939, Way: 1382828802, Way: 1382828807.Please don't duplicate highways, as it's incorrect and could disrupt routing. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-30 08:20 | SomeoneElse2 ♦455 | I've fixed a dodgy overlap at the north end of that which clearly didn't exist.I've assumed that the inland path to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/77964 as I presume that that is where that is signed and routed now (my GPS traces here are from 8 years ago and may not be accu... | |
| 4 | 2025-05-30 08:23 | SomeoneElse2 ♦455 | After editing any paths involved in a hiking route relation (e.g. all the coastal ones!) it makes sense to check http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=77964&noCache=true&_noCache=on (where 77964 is the relation) so that it matches what is signed on the ground. There are obvio... | |
| 165626751 by NTTrailsWLS @ 2025-04-30 09:47 | 1 | 2025-05-03 06:29 | BCNorwich | Duplicated sections of highways Way: 1382530552, Way: 1382530553, Way: 1382530554 are removed. |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 06:10 | BCNorwich | I've removed two more sections of highway: Way 1382530556 and Way 1382530560. Please don't duplicate highways, as it's incorrect and could disrupt routing. | |
| 164632611 by ChocCake @ 2025-04-07 12:38 | 1 | 2025-04-07 17:57 | BCNorwich | Hi, The footpath would not likely be formally named "Footpath". Names must be verifiable as per OSM guidelines. Thus I've removed the name tags. Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-04-07 18:00 | BCNorwich | Hi, You've added Way: 1375580258 with no tags, as such it's of no use to the OSM database. Could you please tag or remove it?Regards Bernard. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-03 00:40 | ChocCake ♦2 | I really tried to add a tag... There is no common name for the footpath. If you can help I would be grateful. | |
| 4 | 2025-05-03 05:56 | BCNorwich | Hi, If there's no common name for a path or any feature then the name= tag should not be added. Only formal and verifiable name should be added to OSM. So the paths are OK with no name.Regards Bernard, Sorry for any confusion. | |
| 164632210 by ChocCake @ 2025-04-07 12:30 | 1 | 2025-04-07 17:50 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to openStreetMap.You've mapped the new path as crossing a waterway, is there a bridge or ford here or perhaps a culvert?Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-05-03 05:08 | BCNorwich | No response, so I've moved the path to a gap in the waterway indicating a crossing point, added a bridge. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-03 08:45 | ChocCake ♦2 | Thank you for completing job. The paths that are added are good and accurate and help others. Thank you again. | |
| 165630526 by Nusrat_Jahan_Nilima @ 2025-04-30 11:19 | 1 | 2025-05-01 05:51 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed several sections of duplicated highways in this area. Please be careful not to duplicate highways as it disrupts routing.Regards. |
| 165595251 by PareshChudasama @ 2025-04-29 14:24 | 1 | 2025-04-29 15:39 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your POI "My Home" is really of no value to OSM and would not be verifiable by other folk passing by.I've removed the POI and added the outlines of the two houses as seen on imagery. You can now add details of your home, remember though that My Hom... |
| 165430535 by AdamAdamo @ 2025-04-25 15:32 | 1 | 2025-04-26 05:50 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Genuine features only should be mapped, can you please show verification of the new castle? I the meantime I've removed it.Regards Bernard. |
| 165433909 by JamesDF @ 2025-04-25 16:50 | 1 | 2025-04-26 05:08 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Can you please say what leads you to believe that pedestrian use is not allowed on these sections of highways?Regards Bernard. |
| 102777791 by BCNorwich @ 2021-04-12 06:53 | 1 | 2025-04-24 15:46 | LordGarySugar ♦70 | Is 52.7190167, -0.6371758 a real housenumber?! |
| 2 | 2025-04-24 16:47 | BCNorwich | Crikey, that was 4 years ago, I've fixed the numbers. Thanks for letting me know.Regards Bernard. | |
| 3 | 2025-04-24 17:42 | LordGarySugar ♦70 | That's a shame, I was hoping it was real! | |
| 165218862 by Thakur Aditya @ 2025-04-21 04:17 | 1 | 2025-04-22 05:27 | BCNorwich | Utility poles are no use without some description of their use. |
| 165219251 by Thakur Aditya @ 2025-04-21 04:40 | 1 | 2025-04-22 05:25 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed highway Way: 1379232753 because it duplicates the line of an existing highway and could cause disruption to routing.Regards Bernard. |
| 165078360 by BCNorwich @ 2025-04-17 15:42 | 1 | 2025-04-21 13:15 | SomeoneElse2 ♦455 | The woodland at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148883959/history got deleted in this changeset. What were you trying to do? |
| 2 | 2025-04-21 13:33 | BCNorwich | My mistake, I've reinstated the woodland. | |
| 165136795 by Thakur Aditya @ 2025-04-19 02:56 | 1 | 2025-04-20 06:39 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Reffereing to your three changesets.Unfortunately, all your added highways duplicate existing highways, resulting in the warnings given above. This duplication could seriously disrupt routing. Thus, I've reverted the changes.Please read the guidance in t... |
| 165103210 by Stevieboycrest @ 2025-04-18 09:36 | 1 | 2025-04-18 10:12 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for the addition to OSM.However, there's no need to draw a second building that's just duplication. You did place your new tags on the existing building outline, which was correct. I've removed the duplicate building, all OK now.Regards ... |
| 165074768 by Chelmsford Paths @ 2025-04-17 14:20 | 1 | 2025-04-17 15:32 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Features that are on the ground truth and verifiable by other folk passing by are features that can be added to the OSM database. Whether they are official or not is a matter of no consequence. The paths you removed can be seen on aerial imagery and as such can be on... |
| 2 | 2025-04-18 09:13 | rskedgell ♦1,481 | @BCNorwich see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165085015 | |
| 3 | 2025-04-21 07:49 | rskedgell ♦1,481 | Deleted again in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165210310Referred to DWG. | |
| 165002570 by mith_ash @ 2025-04-15 20:36 | 1 | 2025-04-17 06:04 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately, your new highway, Way: 1377897003, duplicated existing highways, which could have caused disruption to routing. Thus, I've removed it.If a way needs correcting please correct any existing way.I also corrected the playground area to within ... |
| 165041901 by Alex Emmerson @ 2025-04-16 18:30 | 1 | 2025-04-17 05:07 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for adding the AED.Is that defibrillator fixed to the wall of the community_centre? Or is it fixed to a post or wall beside the footpath?Regards Bernard. |
| 164967801 by ahissa @ 2025-04-15 06:31 | 1 | 2025-04-16 07:02 | BCNorwich | Hi, Regarding Way: طريق الملك عبدالعزيز (1069024975) and Way: طريق الملك عبدالعزيز (135806080). You have placed these two highways on top of each other, making duplication that could disrupt routing. The Bing and Esri imagery seem to show the two highways as a... |
| 2 | 2025-04-16 16:53 | ahissa ♦9 | HiThank you so much for explainI repapred it.Best widhes! | |
| 165006185 by Appdroiduk @ 2025-04-15 23:54 | 1 | 2025-04-16 06:23 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM says "One feature, one OSM element" Thus I've reinstated the buildings original tags. The building serves more than one purpose so it's tagged in a general way. The business is only one use of the building. Please see:- https://wiki.openst... |
| 164884967 by NAYAB TABASSAM @ 2025-04-13 09:05 | 1 | 2025-04-14 06:20 | BCNorwich | Please stop mapping fiction that duplicates genuine highways. |
| 164869112 by NAYAB TABASSAM @ 2025-04-12 19:02 | 1 | 2025-04-13 06:51 | BCNorwich | Reverted to remove fiction that impacted on existing features. |
| 164851975 by Rabia Gull @ 2025-04-12 11:44 | 1 | 2025-04-13 06:49 | BCNorwich | Hi, This changeset is reverted to remove fictional highway that duplicated an existing highway and disrupted routing. Please do not add fictional and/or duplicate highways. |
| 164801144 by Muhammad Labib Hashmi @ 2025-04-11 07:21 | 1 | 2025-04-12 06:33 | BCNorwich | Many fictional duplicating highways were removed. Please do not duplicate highways, it disrupts routing. |
| 164815530 by Mic112467368 @ 2025-04-11 13:06 | 1 | 2025-04-11 13:48 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed this school building outline as it duplicates an existing outline. I put your new tags onto the existing outline.Regards Bernard. |
| 164750957 by Maimoonah @ 2025-04-10 05:23 | 1 | 2025-04-10 18:13 | BCNorwich | Way: 1376364186 removed as it caused many problems, see the warnings above. |
| 164706701 by Maryamchattha @ 2025-04-09 05:51 | 1 | 2025-04-10 18:11 | BCNorwich | Way: 1376031656 has been removed because it's mapping caused many duplication problems. |
| 2 | 2025-04-10 18:11 | BCNorwich | As well as causing all the warnings above. | |
| 164647749 by smurthyblr76 @ 2025-04-07 18:26 | 1 | 2025-04-09 06:18 | BCNorwich | Way: Mangalagiri - Mundur (1375650194) removed because it duplicates an existing highway thus disrupting routing. Also part of Way: Mangalagiri - Mundur (1375650195), same reason. |
| 164690973 by Pauzible_LDN @ 2025-04-08 17:44 | 1 | 2025-04-09 05:11 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I wonder does your business occupy the whole building? If not then it should be represented by a node inside the building outline.Regards Bernard. |
| 164650191 by Jo White MP @ 2025-04-07 19:34 | 1 | 2025-04-08 05:02 | NeisReview ♦940 | #UnexplainedChangesHello, welcome to OSM.Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?Looking forward to your response. Thank you. |
| 2 | 2025-04-08 05:15 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately your test has removed tags from a bus route and deformed the outline of a church. It's possible that you were not aware of the inadvertent corruption to the database? Anyway I've corrected the situation by reverting the changeset.I see tha... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-08 05:20 | BCNorwich | Hi I now see JO Wight's office is at The Crossing, can you indicate where it's situated.Regards Bernard. | |
| 4 | 2025-04-08 10:54 | spiregrain ♦198 | This might be an attempt to answer: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jo%20White%20MP/diary/406508Intriguing possibility that the user here is actually the MP for Bassetlaw. | |
| 164512773 by Sforzando9500 @ 2025-04-04 14:42 | 1 | 2025-04-07 06:07 | BCNorwich | Duplicated sections of highway removed. |
| 164474040 by Sforzando9500 @ 2025-04-03 16:35 | 1 | 2025-04-07 06:07 | BCNorwich | Duplicated sections of highway removed. |
| 19691594 by BCNorwich @ 2013-12-29 07:33 | 1 | 2025-04-06 08:49 | Tomas_J ♦288 | Obecný popis \tdětské prolézačky do tagu name nepatří |
| 2 | 2025-04-06 10:41 | BCNorwich | Hi, Tomas_J, The descriptive name was added in this changeset:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19422697#map=18/49.880544/12.983301&layers=NNot by me.Regards Bernard. | |
| 3 | 2025-04-06 11:03 | Tomas_J ♦288 | Oh, sorry | |
| 164531738 by Opie Eke Ogburu @ 2025-04-04 23:49 | 1 | 2025-04-05 05:57 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The node you added has no descriptive tags so therefore is of no value/use in the OSM database.Please read the help and guidelines linked above. Then add tags to the node.Regards Bernard. |
| 164502607 by conornash @ 2025-04-04 11:05 | 1 | 2025-04-04 11:58 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've tweaked the buildings to square them up, last tweaked the postal codes.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-04-04 12:32 | conornash ♦1 | Thanks Bernard. Was there a particular tool you used to get them all to line up neatly? | |
| 3 | 2025-04-04 13:41 | BCNorwich | Hi, I see you are using the iD editor. For your five new buildings, you first need to join the corners of the buildings. Select/highlight one building, drag a corner node onto the corner node of the adjacent building, release it, it should stick/join the two corner nodes together, (test by again dra... | |
| 4 | 2025-04-04 13:45 | BCNorwich | Using the JOSM editor you could draw the whole block outline then terrace the block into eight even houses. JOSM takes longer, more effort to learn but is a much superior editor, recommended if you're going to do much OSM editing. | |
| 164348167 by nothingcat @ 2025-03-31 20:31 | 1 | 2025-04-01 06:40 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You requested a review of your two changesets. I've noted the date and thus reverted the changes. Please note that with the amount of warnings given above it was not very convincing and would have disrupted routing. How did you think the trains would have negoti... |
| 2 | 2025-04-01 15:45 | nothingcat ♦1 | Sent To council For all the new station | |
| 3 | 2025-04-01 19:51 | nothingcat ♦1 | All the stations and train tracks in the buildings on construction site | |
| 4 | 2025-04-05 09:48 | nothingcat ♦1 | Do not delete it because the station hasn’t built yet | |
| 164236269 by raiqa aftab Raiqa56 @ 2025-03-29 07:04 | 1 | 2025-03-30 07:15 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highways removed. |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 07:34 | BCNorwich | You've made duplicated highways in nearly all your changesets. Please read the help pages and OSM guidelines before more mapping.Duplicated highways seriously disrupt routing. | |
| 164235842 by raiqa aftab Raiqa56 @ 2025-03-29 06:50 | 1 | 2025-03-30 07:30 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 164236013 by raiqa aftab Raiqa56 @ 2025-03-29 06:56 | 1 | 2025-03-30 07:28 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 164236092 by raiqa aftab Raiqa56 @ 2025-03-29 06:59 | 1 | 2025-03-30 07:25 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 164236177 by raiqa aftab Raiqa56 @ 2025-03-29 07:01 | 1 | 2025-03-30 07:23 | BCNorwich | Duplicate highway removed. |
| 164235239 by raiqa aftab Raiqa56 @ 2025-03-29 06:23 | 1 | 2025-03-30 07:07 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reverted this changeset because the way added duplicates an existing highway which will disrupt routing.Regards Bernard. |
| 164214655 by Ambreen Ajmal @ 2025-03-28 16:03 | 1 | 2025-03-29 07:44 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You tagged the outline of a residential area as a highway, this causes disruption to routing. I've made corrections.Before uploading please heed any warnings like those given above.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-03-29 07:56 | BCNorwich | Other duplicated highway removed. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-29 08:08 | BCNorwich | Even more duplicated highways removed, I think that all. | |
| 164215134 by Ambreen Ajmal @ 2025-03-28 16:14 | 1 | 2025-03-29 08:06 | BCNorwich | Hi, Several highways are duplicates of existing highways which disrupt routing.I've removed the duplications.Regards Bernard. |
| 164215090 by Ambreen Ajmal @ 2025-03-28 16:13 | 1 | 2025-03-29 07:52 | BCNorwich | Hi, Review, both highways are duplicates of existing highways which disrupt routing. I've removed the duplications.Regards Bernard. |
| 164192965 by NAYAB TABASSAM @ 2025-03-28 06:38 | 1 | 2025-03-29 07:19 | BCNorwich | Duplicated university deleted, grounds alreaddy mapped. House tagged correctly. |
| 164194836 by NAYAB TABASSAM @ 2025-03-28 07:43 | 1 | 2025-03-29 07:11 | BCNorwich | Duplication, changeset reverted. |
| 164195945 by NAYAB TABASSAM @ 2025-03-28 08:16 | 1 | 2025-03-29 07:07 | BCNorwich | Duplication, changeset reverted. |
| 164195552 by NAYAB TABASSAM @ 2025-03-28 08:02 | 1 | 2025-03-29 07:05 | BCNorwich | Hi, This changeset has been reverted because it only adds duplicated highways and fictional names. Please don't add your personal routes/features/notes to the OSM database as it disrupts routing.You're welcome to add genuine, on-the-ground, and verifiable features as per OSM best pract... |
| 164103695 by khadijakhanum12 @ 2025-03-26 03:15 | 1 | 2025-03-27 07:17 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed these two highways:- Way: goleki road (1371486853) and Way: jalal pur road (1371486852 Reason being that they duplicate the lines of existing highways and this disrupts routing. |
| 164105535 by thotasam @ 2025-03-26 05:16 | 1 | 2025-03-26 09:43 | rskedgell ♦1,481 | Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Please could you use a meaningful changeset comment, as "#modified Geometry" conveys no useful information whatsoever about what you were trying to achieve.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 2 | 2025-03-27 06:00 | BCNorwich | Removed one unnecessary node from existing highway. Seems like you and a lot of your co-workers are adding unnecessary single nodes to highways, I am wondering why? Do you help with anything? | |
| 164075130 by Nicola Knop @ 2025-03-25 12:35 | 1 | 2025-03-25 14:59 | BCNorwich | Paths in the woods are reinstated. The woods area is open access on foot. |
| 2 | 2025-03-25 16:22 | rskedgell ♦1,481 | Please also seehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3Fandhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property | |
| 164058263 by Esha Qudrat @ 2025-03-25 03:37 | 1 | 2025-03-25 07:18 | BCNorwich | I've removed the duplicate highway kotla road (1370905582), v3 Please do not make duplicate highways as it disrupts routing. |
| 163996206 by Vijay Choudhary 36 @ 2025-03-23 16:39 | 1 | 2025-03-24 07:49 | BCNorwich | Way: Veer Teja Marg (1370669941) has been removed because it duplicates an existing highway and it disrupts routing.You are repeatedly duplicating highway, please stop. |
| 163996509 by Vijay Choudhary 36 @ 2025-03-23 16:45 | 1 | 2025-03-24 07:44 | BCNorwich | Way: Choudhary Colony Road (1370670522) has been removed because it duplicates an existing highway and it disrupts routing. |
| 163993815 by 小智智 @ 2025-03-23 15:48 | 1 | 2025-03-24 07:09 | BCNorwich | Hi, The spiral steps must be properly made into layered sections, and the appropriate layer tags must be added. At the moment the steps self-intersect and cross over other step sections with no way of knowing how they relate to each other.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-03-24 09:49 | 小智智 ♦53 | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-tag-spiral-staircases/127529/6Self intersection of spiral staircases is not a problem (although I have to add the missing tags - I ran out of time when surveying the station) | |
| 163965034 by J_J08 @ 2025-03-22 21:38 | 1 | 2025-03-23 07:41 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It's the fire station that's disused not the building, I've tweaked the tags.Good work, Regards Bernard. |
| 163933499 by abithaola @ 2025-03-22 06:40 | 1 | 2025-03-23 07:08 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed several of the highways you added as they duplicated existing highways thus disrupting routing.Regards Bernard. |
| 163956656 by Maximilian Algaard @ 2025-03-22 17:02 | 1 | 2025-03-22 19:21 | BCNorwich | A few tweaks were made |
| 163955777 by Maximilian Algaard @ 2025-03-22 16:42 | 1 | 2025-03-22 19:07 | BCNorwich | Cutting tag removed from path, not relevant. |
| 163955443 by Maximilian Algaard @ 2025-03-22 16:35 | 1 | 2025-03-22 19:02 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The path was not joined to the highway at either end, I've fixed it.Regards Bernard. |
| 163946842 by mathymcmathface @ 2025-03-22 13:09 | 1 | 2025-03-22 14:54 | BCNorwich | I've reinstated the deleted section of this highway, please see my previous comment as to the reason.Regards Bernard. |
| 163946781 by mathymcmathface @ 2025-03-22 13:08 | 1 | 2025-03-22 14:51 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Park View Mews can clearly be seen on imagery going down to the houses, so it's a valid feature for the OSM map. Thus, I've reinstated it. Please don't remove features just because they're not accessible to the public. OSM shows everything that�... |
| 163894666 by Vijay Choudhary 36 @ 2025-03-21 08:48 | 1 | 2025-03-22 07:38 | BCNorwich | Removed fictional highway and a ford that disrupts routing. Please do not add duplicate highways they seriously disrupt routing. |
| 163806974 by Asad@244224 @ 2025-03-19 08:52 | 1 | 2025-03-20 07:56 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Before uploading please take heed of any warnings, many were given above. I'm not sure what you were trying to achieve but Way: 1369011308 (a very long highway) caused the warnings. It duplicated many existing highways thus disrupting routing. Thus I've... |
| 163805543 by Vijay Choudhary 36 @ 2025-03-19 08:09 | 1 | 2025-03-20 07:36 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 163805902 by Vijay Choudhary 36 @ 2025-03-19 08:20 | 1 | 2025-03-20 07:33 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed the duplicated highways indicated by the warnings above. |
| 163815083 by flossie36 @ 2025-03-19 12:25 | 1 | 2025-03-19 15:05 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Could you say where exactly the AED is situated? Is it fixed to a wall? Seen from the road? Near the corner front of building, side of building? Available 24/7?Regards Bernard. |
| 163806719 by Finli UK @ 2025-03-19 08:45 | 1 | 2025-03-19 12:33 | BCNorwich | Hi, You tagged the business onto a block of apartments. I've made a node with your business info. Please check its over the correct part of the apartment building?Regards Bernard. |
| 163685014 by spenserthecat @ 2025-03-16 11:49 | 1 | 2025-03-16 14:33 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Isn't that a bridge where you've tagged a ford? Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-03-18 12:02 | BCNorwich | No response so I've changed for to bridge as seen on imagery. | |
| 163700799 by Harveeymaps @ 2025-03-16 18:12 | 1 | 2025-03-17 07:21 | BCNorwich | Hi, I can see no evidence of this very long boardwalk through the farmland meadow and parallel to the footpath. Does this boardwalk/path exist? It joins to a bridge (duplication of highway), and culvert (layer-1), which is impossible. Neither end joins the footpath network.Could you please respo... |
| 2 | 2025-03-17 10:23 | Harveeymaps ♦1 | hi Bernard, I can confirm it exists as I helped build it. the boardwalk was built in the last year so satellite imagery is evidently not up to date, because of this I had to guess a little in regards to its exact position. the bridge is also not there anymore it is just the boardwalk. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-17 13:24 | gurglypipe ♦873 | @Harveeymaps I’d just like to say thanks for taking the time to update the map for things which you helped build, it’s fantastic to have this kind of local knowledge put on the map straight from the source :) | |
| 4 | 2025-03-17 14:01 | BCNorwich | Hi, Thanks for responding. I've added layer=1 to the boardwalk and made the section that was a bridge part of the boardwalk maintaining the Right of Way tags on that section. I've also unjoined the boardwalk from the culvert.Is any other part of the boardwalk also now the Right of Way ... | |
| 5 | 2025-03-17 20:03 | Harveeymaps ♦1 | Hi Bernard, I don’t know in regards to the Right of Way. At the NE end, I’ve just seen that I extended the boardwalk a bit far. I’ll remedy that now. Basically at that end, the existing footpath just runs along the beach and the boardwalk ends just before the beach starts.At ... | |
| 6 | 2025-03-17 20:12 | Harveeymaps ♦1 | I’ve just tried to disconnect the boardwalk from the wall but don’t know how ( I’m relatively new to OSM) It actually hits the footpath 20m or so back. Could you either do this or tell me how? Thanks. | |
| 7 | 2025-03-18 07:09 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've amended the NE end and added a note to the boardwalk asking for the ends to be checked. | |
| 8 | 2025-03-18 21:02 | Harveeymaps ♦1 | Thanks bernard | |
| 163655761 by إسراء حلبي @ 2025-03-15 15:25 | 1 | 2025-03-16 07:41 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately you've made lots of duplicated sections of highways here, which seriously disrupts routing. Thus I've removed all the duplication while trying to maintain your new information.If a highway needs amending or correcting it is OSM practice t... |
| 163500912 by polivarz @ 2025-03-11 20:12 | 1 | 2025-03-12 07:04 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The building that you've tagged as addr:housenumber=60 is actually two houses. I'm not sure that either of these two houses are number 60. I've terraced the buildings, could you check the number 60 is correct please.Regards Bernard. |
| 163138976 by JNLex @ 2025-03-02 21:32 | 1 | 2025-03-11 08:44 | BCNorwich | Hi, The terms "Permissive Path" and "Private" would not be the formal names verifiable to anyone passing by, (verifiable as per OSM guidelines). The terms would be unnecessary descriptions.Regards Bernard. |
| 163407243 by Chetan-- @ 2025-03-09 16:09 | 1 | 2025-03-10 07:40 | BCNorwich | Duplicate highways removed. |
| 163230044 by SuperPhat @ 2025-03-05 06:36 | 1 | 2025-03-05 08:28 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Features added to OSM must be on the ground truth verifiable to everyone. Thus I've reverted those two fictional names.Regarding MacEmergency Apple Repair Store London, this business would not be on the pavement here. I can not find evidence of a physical b... |
| 2 | 2025-03-05 09:51 | SuperPhat ♦1 | 1) Ignore Sweet FA Computers please.2) Apple Mac Repairs London (Refurbished Mac Shop) can be found here: https://g.co/kgs/FC1CbZR and here: https://www.bing.com/maps?&ty=18&ss=ypid.YN1029x16986357988605005901&mb=51.586113~-0.1135~51.581613~-0.109059&description=81%20Tottenham%20... | |
| 163121535 by ajppower @ 2025-03-02 13:20 | 1 | 2025-03-02 14:07 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've terraced the block and added the addresses, except the postcodes. Please check and amend if necessary.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-03-04 11:31 | ajppower ♦1 | Thank you Bernard, appreciated. As you know I'm new - feeling my way!Looks good, save it seems 'chopped off' but I think that's my browser....Andy | |
| 3 | 2025-03-04 12:20 | BCNorwich | Hi, Glad to help. Try refreshing/clearing your browser cache or reloading the page to see the new rendering of the buildings.Regards Bernard. | |
| 163121784 by padgii @ 2025-03-02 13:25 | 1 | 2025-03-03 07:24 | BCNorwich | Fiction names removed. |
| 163137210 by Pi_Master @ 2025-03-02 20:30 | 1 | 2025-03-03 06:20 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reverted your changes in order to maintain the correct school address. Please refrain from incorrect changes.Regards Bernard. |
| 163103896 by sayammj75 @ 2025-03-01 22:06 | 1 | 2025-03-02 06:41 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've reinstated the roller coaster tag here, reason being that the sites website says it's a roller coaster and it is an attraction. |
| 163001203 by Wendi F @ 2025-02-27 07:56 | 1 | 2025-03-01 19:15 | BCNorwich | remove foot=private |
| 163001174 by Wendi F @ 2025-02-27 07:55 | 1 | 2025-03-01 19:13 | BCNorwich | Reverted to allow access to path in park |
| 163001167 by Wendi F @ 2025-02-27 07:54 | 1 | 2025-02-27 09:10 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your tag foot=no on a footpath is not logical. If it's a footpath then foot access is surely allowed in some form.I see you've added tags like this on many footpaths. Could you =please correct these anomalies? Need help please just ask.Regards Berna... |
| 2 | 2025-03-01 19:10 | BCNorwich | No response so reverted. | |
| 163085136 by Enquix @ 2025-03-01 11:56 | 1 | 2025-03-01 14:13 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.That short stub of highway that you deleted does exist, it serves the garages. Could you please reinstate it?Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-03-06 10:24 | dzidek23 ♦59 | Hi, also the buildings you have moved, which were linked to other ones, changed shape quite badly. Could you make sure to square things if you move them. You can use "Q" in the editor for that. | |
| 163055243 by aaronliuaaaa @ 2025-02-28 14:31 | 1 | 2025-02-28 16:10 | BCNorwich | Changes reverted. |
| 163010637 by Samaneh_Ramezani @ 2025-02-27 12:37 | 1 | 2025-02-27 16:30 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The best practice tags for the feature would be building=apartments. The name would not be the number 1. Your tag landuse=residential would apply to the area of land that the residential building is situated on, which is already drawn and tagged.I've squared... |
| 162977175 by Kathryn Heffer @ 2025-02-26 15:36 | 1 | 2025-02-26 17:17 | BCNorwich | 'name=Post Office, adj' is the official name of the stop, it's not meant to exactly describe the stop position. |
| 162977143 by Georgie Aldous @ 2025-02-26 15:35 | 1 | 2025-02-26 16:57 | BCNorwich | Bus Stop returned. |
| 162971428 by Abi_Lee_76 @ 2025-02-26 13:16 | 1 | 2025-02-26 15:09 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Why did you turn leisure=park into a beach? There is no beach there!Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group |
| 2 | 2025-02-26 15:33 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.That's not the beach it's East Beach Park, so I've reverted these changes to the park. The beach is this area:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128291302#map=17/51.531319/0.802797 So could you please make the changes there.Regards Bernard. | |
| 162934238 by Leap Environmental @ 2025-02-25 14:16 | 1 | 2025-02-26 12:17 | BCNorwich | Reverted to remove duplicated highway. |
| 162521509 by Brparra @ 2025-02-14 23:04 | 1 | 2025-02-26 11:39 | BCNorwich | Hi, This is not an area:aeroway=yes as it's not part of an airport. Removed the tag. |
| 162955570 by Brparra @ 2025-02-26 03:01 | 1 | 2025-02-26 10:48 | BCNorwich | A power line only needs a layer tag if it crosses another similar feature, thus to determine which item is above the other. The name of the line would not be "high voltage". The ref would not be "power=tower". I've amended.The line is tagged as cables=3 so your triple ... |
| 162955582 by Brparra @ 2025-02-26 03:01 | 1 | 2025-02-26 10:39 | BCNorwich | Hi, The name would not be "power=tower". Tag removed. |
| 162955769 by Brparra @ 2025-02-26 03:17 | 1 | 2025-02-26 10:31 | BCNorwich | Height would not be 0, levels would be 1, usually each word in a formal name should be capitalised. I've amended. |
| 162955957 by Brparra @ 2025-02-26 03:34 | 1 | 2025-02-26 10:21 | BCNorwich | Fiction reverted. |
| 162956177 by Brparra @ 2025-02-26 03:52 | 1 | 2025-02-26 10:16 | BCNorwich | Avenida Brasileira reverted back to residential. The value of the access= tag should be in lower case, "yes" not "YES". Actually, in this instance, it's not needed at all, it's absence implies yes. I've amended. |
| 162956072 by Brparra @ 2025-02-26 03:43 | 1 | 2025-02-26 10:10 | BCNorwich | Hi, The building:levels tag is to describe the number of visible levels (floors) in the building. So in this case it would be 1 not 0. I've amended.Regards Bernard |
| 162765041 by Bond Dental London (Kensington) @ 2025-02-21 05:27 | 1 | 2025-02-21 06:15 | NeisBot ♦2,342 | Hello, thank you for your contribution.I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SpamCould you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?#M... |
| 2 | 2025-02-21 07:23 | BCNorwich | Hi, Buildings had been made circular, I've reverted them to original shape as best I can. | |
| 162626251 by Ketan KUMAR @ 2025-02-17 17:51 | 1 | 2025-02-21 07:06 | BCNorwich | Several fiction duplicate highways were removed. |
| 162714392 by Mohd Akeel @ 2025-02-19 19:22 | 1 | 2025-02-20 07:47 | BCNorwich | It's not a motorway. |
| 162630970 by Thejaswani R @ 2025-02-17 19:22 | 1 | 2025-02-20 07:42 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 162636795 by Thejaswani R @ 2025-02-17 21:55 | 1 | 2025-02-20 07:41 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 162727321 by BCNorwich @ 2025-02-20 07:13 | 1 | 2025-02-20 07:21 | BCNorwich | Sorry about the large BB I tried to upload each feature separately but the box remained large. |
| 162690266 by BCNorwich @ 2025-02-19 08:25 | 1 | 2025-02-19 09:48 | codll ♦10 | ohh bbox so big |
| 2 | 2025-02-19 10:44 | ilias_ ♦217 | so so big | |
| 3 | 2025-02-19 11:31 | BCNorwich | I have no idea how that happened I was only editing two houses in a tiny section at the top left of that bounding box. JOSM did warn me and I made sure the edit was actually only on a small area. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-19 14:17 | muralito ♦2,023 | A way and nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1360998521/history in the bottom left of the bbox were deleted.Probably those changes should have been uploaded with your previous changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162688511 but somehow they didn't, probably you overlooked i... | |
| 5 | 2025-02-19 14:50 | BCNorwich | Hi muralito, Yes that explians it. I knew it was my fault but didn't know where the change you pointed out was. I've been trying to find out how rectify this problem but cannot understand how to split a changeset when the BBox is large.Thanks & Regards Bernard. | |
| 6 | 2025-02-19 18:00 | muralito ♦2,023 | I suppose that when Josm raises a warning, it should calculate and split the changeset itself in two or more changesets with smaller bboxes, at least calculate if it is feasible like this case seems to be, because the deleted nodes in that corner has no relationship with the elements changed in the ... | |
| 7 | 2025-02-19 19:47 | DanielAgos ♦12 | When JOSM warns you about changeset size, it will just do that, warn you. If you actually want to split the changes you have to do it by yourself as there are instances where you want to override the warning and upload a big changeset | |
| 162635153 by CipherXcel (Priyanshu Raj) @ 2025-02-17 21:05 | 1 | 2025-02-19 09:03 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed many duplicated highways. Please don't place a highway on top of an existing highway asit disrupts routing. |
| 162625919 by Ketan KUMAR @ 2025-02-17 17:45 | 1 | 2025-02-19 08:53 | BCNorwich | Fiction removed. |
| 162636820 by Thejaswani R @ 2025-02-17 21:56 | 1 | 2025-02-19 08:40 | BCNorwich | Fiction removed. |
| 162636678 by Devalekshmi H R @ 2025-02-17 21:52 | 1 | 2025-02-19 08:39 | BCNorwich | Duplicated sections of highway removed. |
| 162678164 by Leonie Hughes2 @ 2025-02-18 21:34 | 1 | 2025-02-19 08:17 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think that building is two semi detached houses. I've amended the building outline. But which one is Seaview? I've tagged the names as I think they should be with Seaview to the east, could you please confirm this? Secondly is Seaview a holiday let cottag... |
| 162676633 by BBRMapper @ 2025-02-18 20:42 | 1 | 2025-02-19 07:28 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed some duplicated sections of highway that you somehow added. |
| 162668539 by JNLex @ 2025-02-18 16:43 | 1 | 2025-02-18 17:04 | BCNorwich | Hi, the section through the gate and lightly wooded area is a highway which looks like it is accessed for agricultural or livestock purposes. |
| 162659615 by Jon Aspinall @ 2025-02-18 12:36 | 1 | 2025-02-18 15:01 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your new area would not be verifiable as formally named name=Home Area. it could be as per the other tag a description=home Area.Unfortunately the landuse=residential area is within an already mapped residential area (Way: 44928988) https://www.openstreetmap.org/... |
| 162652396 by JNLex @ 2025-02-18 09:38 | 1 | 2025-02-18 14:47 | BCNorwich | No need to delete this. I've tagged it as agricultural. |
| 162652369 by JNLex @ 2025-02-18 09:38 | 1 | 2025-02-18 14:38 | BCNorwich | Hi, Again on the ground features are OK in the OSM database. The wooded area The Sandhills - Open Access Land (279300967) is as tagged an area that is designated to be open to the public on foot as per the CRoW Act 2000. Please see here:- https://naturalengland-defra.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/Def... |
| 2 | 2025-02-18 15:49 | JNLex ♦2 | Hi Bernard, Thanks for this. We were sure that the common land had not been re-registered. Apologies. Thank you for re-instating it.We have made permissive footpaths throughout the estate here, which I have updated and added in some more routes that were not listed. However, there are pl... | |
| 162651967 by JNLex @ 2025-02-18 09:27 | 1 | 2025-02-18 14:17 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The tracks and paths you've removed can be seen on the ground and on aerial imagery. Thus they are verifiable features and appropriate for the OSM database. I've reinstated them all.Regards Bernard. |
| 162604501 by AviArora @ 2025-02-17 10:06 | 1 | 2025-02-18 08:03 | BCNorwich | Several duplicated highways removed. If a ways needs correcting please correct the existing way, don't just map on top of it. Duplicated highways can disrupt routing, thanks. |
| 162613710 by Prem IIT(BHU) @ 2025-02-17 13:50 | 1 | 2025-02-18 07:35 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 162619535 by Madhu R @ 2025-02-17 15:55 | 1 | 2025-02-18 07:34 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highways removed. |
| 162611514 by sathiya_murugan@kpm @ 2025-02-17 13:07 | 1 | 2025-02-18 07:30 | BCNorwich | That's not a motorway, I've removed it. |
| 162585949 by jjcarr93 @ 2025-02-16 20:28 | 1 | 2025-02-17 07:23 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This footpath is a Public Right of Way and is currently open for use. There is an overlapping zig-zag gap in the central barrier for foot use on the A14. The state of the path nor the user's expectation does not alter these facts. If you don't feel safe on ... |
| 162582664 by Kat Leo @ 2025-02-16 18:51 | 1 | 2025-02-17 06:25 | BCNorwich | Hi, The apartments would be parts of the main building tagged as building:part=apartment. They should also have a level=? tag, could you please add this or let me know, I'll add themI've made amendments.Regards Bernard. |
| 162529400 by PondWitch @ 2025-02-15 09:31 | 1 | 2025-02-15 11:31 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.That building looks like two houses. Do you need help with it? If so what is the other number and is 39 the north or south house?Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-02-15 17:09 | PondWitch ♦1 | 39 is north, 41 is south. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-15 17:37 | BCNorwich | Thanks, sorted.Regards Bernard. | |
| 162396766 by KATTA NAGA VENKATA SAI ABHISHEK @ 2025-02-11 15:53 | 1 | 2025-02-12 07:44 | BCNorwich | I've made many corrections to your mapping. These are not motorways. Please take time to learn how to map properly, there are many guides. When uploading take heed of any warnings, 28 are given above for these changes.Thank You. |
| 162394523 by KATTA NAGA VENKATA SAI ABHISHEK @ 2025-02-11 14:52 | 1 | 2025-02-12 07:32 | BCNorwich | Hi, Thanks for trying to help but adding fiction does not help. With the 14 highway warnings given above you have disrupted routing here. Thus I've reverted your changes.Regards Bernard. |
| 162410221 by UT_TV_Tech @ 2025-02-11 23:15 | 1 | 2025-02-12 06:22 | BCNorwich | I've unjoined the wood area from the highways. |
| 161925701 by BDC_centre @ 2025-01-30 07:25 | 1 | 2025-01-30 08:21 | BCNorwich | Hi, Indoor mapping is extremely complex and your additions don't meet OSM best practice. I think you ought remove these indoor features and perhaps learn the intracies of it first, a search for 'OSM indoor mapping help' would help you.Regards Bernard.You are still duplicating ... |
| 2 | 2025-02-10 07:30 | BCNorwich | Problem features removed. | |
| 161922815 by BDC_centre @ 2025-01-30 04:59 | 1 | 2025-01-30 06:36 | BCNorwich | Hi, More untagged ways, can they be removed or will you rag them. If they stay they would be better if squared up. |
| 2 | 2025-02-10 07:29 | BCNorwich | No response so I've removed the untagged ways and nodes. | |
| 162243428 by TansyR @ 2025-02-07 12:23 | 1 | 2025-02-08 07:26 | BCNorwich | Hi, You duplicated areas of solar panels that were already mapped by the fields. I've removed the duplication.Regards Bernard. |
| 162219117 by AlexPink @ 2025-02-06 18:47 | 1 | 2025-02-07 06:20 | BCNorwich | Fiction name removed, |
| 162145951 by Kshitija Kulkarni @ 2025-02-04 23:30 | 1 | 2025-02-06 07:31 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Several of these highways duplicated existing highways. I've removed the duplicate because they would disrupt routing. Regards Bernard. |
| 162121100 by sdrp @ 2025-02-04 11:21 | 1 | 2025-02-05 07:18 | BCNorwich | Hi, part of the footpath Way: 1356645945 duplicated an existing highway so I've removed that section of footpath.Regards Bernard. |
| 159872995 by etgg @ 2024-12-03 09:37 | 1 | 2025-02-03 08:05 | BCNorwich | Hi, Just to let you know OSM best practice for Public Rights of Way that have names. Only formal and verifiable names are meant to go in the name tag. The PRoW reference is a reference used by the Highway Authority, it's not a name and should not be added to the name tag. It should go in the pr... |
| 162032905 by ehubgb @ 2025-02-02 03:30 | 1 | 2025-02-02 06:54 | BCNorwich | Hi, There's no such agency on the side of the road just here. The website also suggests no office here. Thus I assume this is fiction and remove the node. If it's somewhere else I may be able to help, just ask here,Regards Bernard. |
| 161977811 by Uniqfloors @ 2025-01-31 13:43 | 1 | 2025-01-31 17:14 | BCNorwich | Hi. I've tweaked your tagging and removed the relation, it's not needed.Regards Bernard. |
| 161973043 by Smithpaul @ 2025-01-31 11:12 | 1 | 2025-01-31 13:41 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The OSM database is to record data about on-the-ground verifiable features. It looks like this place, 10 Green Lane is an NHS surgery. The Travel Franchise website does not list this property as it's office. Thus I've removed your test listing node.By a... |
| 161967320 by Mhamilton61 @ 2025-01-31 08:11 | 1 | 2025-01-31 09:52 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The so called track is actually a highway=service, service=driveway, with access+private. I've amended to suit.Regards Bernard. |
| 161922694 by BDC_centre @ 2025-01-30 04:51 | 1 | 2025-01-30 06:40 | BCNorwich | Duplicated building Way: Business Design Centre (1355303925) removed. |
| 161859943 by unitel-anth @ 2025-01-28 14:28 | 1 | 2025-01-28 17:51 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've moved your node to the position indicated on your website, on Maderia Road. Regards Bernard. |
| 161771325 by BCNorwich @ 2025-01-26 08:17 | 1 | 2025-01-28 14:09 | mueschel ♦6,575 | Could you check this way, it got two strange tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96007149 |
| 2 | 2025-01-28 17:21 | BCNorwich | Hi, Thanks for drawing my attention here. Yes a mistake on my part in placing part of the tag value in the key. It's a Public Right of Way so the tags are designated=public_footpathprow_ref=Hartwith cum Winsley BR 15.55/72/1I've corrected it.Regards Bernard. | |
| 161780508 by Ian Ankers @ 2025-01-26 13:36 | 1 | 2025-01-28 07:12 | BCNorwich | Hi, the definitive map reference for a highway is not the name.Regards Bernard. |
| 161827723 by TessaAURI @ 2025-01-27 17:21 | 1 | 2025-01-28 06:26 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I reverted this changeset because it dragged features out of shape, re the warnings above.Regards Bernard. |
| 161606475 by Risphil @ 2025-01-21 16:14 | 1 | 2025-01-25 08:50 | BCNorwich | Hi, The apartment is located in the highway area. Could you tag the address and place it in the appropriate building? Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-01-27 17:09 | BCNorwich | No response and not enough info to properly position it so removed. | |
| 161730553 by William Hickson @ 2025-01-24 22:54 | 1 | 2025-01-26 09:10 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed Way: 1354046852, as it duplicates the existing highway, I've amended the existing highways.Please check for problems like this before uploading as they would disrupt routing.Regards Bernard. |
| 161730460 by William Hickson @ 2025-01-24 22:49 | 1 | 2025-01-26 08:34 | BCNorwich | Ford tag removed from footpath. |
| 161729469 by William Hickson @ 2025-01-24 21:57 | 1 | 2025-01-26 08:25 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed Way: 1354039317 as it duplicates an existing highway.Regards Bernard. |
| 161751593 by William Hickson @ 2025-01-25 15:50 | 1 | 2025-01-26 08:15 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed these two highways, Way: White House Lane (1354202722) and Way: White House Lane (1354202723) because they duplicate existing highways. If a feature needs amending it's OSM best practice to amend/correct any existing feature, not just map it again, thus the feature histo... |
| 161729137 by William Hickson @ 2025-01-24 21:42 | 1 | 2025-01-26 07:54 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMao.I've removed this highway because it duplicates an existing highway. If a feature needs amending it's OSM best practice to amend/correct anty existing feature, not just map it again, thus the feature history is maintained.Regards Bernard. |
| 161716381 by Heskie @ 2025-01-24 15:10 | 1 | 2025-01-24 19:36 | BCNorwich | Tagged details to the campsite outline |
| 161724160 by Georgedddd @ 2025-01-24 18:37 | 1 | 2025-01-24 19:25 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've reinstated the unclasssified status of these highways as per OSM practice.Regards Bernard. |
| 161675453 by Owen Richmond @ 2025-01-23 13:50 | 1 | 2025-01-24 07:44 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Please could you more precisely position the defibrillator so folk can easily find it? At the moment it's inside the building but your tag in inside=no, a bit confusing.If you explain it's position maybe I could help?Regards Bernard. |
| 161599030 by Nia20 @ 2025-01-21 12:39 | 1 | 2025-01-22 08:13 | BCNorwich | Hi, Several problems here with duplication of highways which could cause disruption of routing. I've removed parts of ways: 1353142317, 1353142317, 1353124796, 1353124779, 1353142314, 1353124778 and 1353124784. Also removed ways 1353142318, 1353142319, 1353124780 and 1353124781Please do... |
| 161575119 by StonePnb @ 2025-01-20 19:03 | 1 | 2025-01-21 11:23 | BCNorwich | Hi, that's a building, not a garden, it may have a garden around it though. I've made an amendment,Regards Bernard. |
| 161573681 by Jason He He @ 2025-01-20 18:09 | 1 | 2025-01-21 07:58 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The area can be tagged as both leisure=nature_reserve and natural=wood. I've amended the tags and added a website tag.Regards Bernard. |
| 161567667 by mapette @ 2025-01-20 15:20 | 1 | 2025-01-21 07:51 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reverted your deletion of this track because it is a verifiable, ground-truth feature. It has been on the OSM database since 2014. I do not believe that OSM has ever tagged it incorrectly as a cycle path or footpath. It is tagged as private.Regards Bern... |
| 2 | 2025-01-21 15:22 | mapette ♦1 | Hi Bernard, thank you for confirming that it is tagged as private. Kind regards. | |
| 161552824 by rdude21 @ 2025-01-20 08:37 | 1 | 2025-01-20 13:25 | BCNorwich | Hi, Mill Road is an unclassified road ref U7063 from the B1063 to the PRoW near the gate. From there to the A143 It is a farm track designated as a Public Footpath. The above information is available on the county definitive map. The names you added are at best unneeded descriptions, definitely not... |
| 2 | 2025-01-20 17:50 | rdude21 ♦1 | Hi Bernard I live at great mill and my father lives at min-y-felin who owns the dirt track to the A143 which has a gate on just before his house. The problem we are getting is Amazon deliverys trying to get to great mill and Milltop (used to be called Cheray) and min-y-felin. It clearly states on de... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-20 19:15 | BCNorwich | Hi Richard, It's good to be able to talk things through. If I may first explain something, OpenStreetMap is not actually a conventional map. It is a licensed open database from which anyone can compile a map. Amazon has its own proprietary mapping software based on OpenStreetMap data, which in... | |
| 4 | 2025-01-20 20:31 | rdude21 ♦1 | Hi thanks for the reply. yes the gate is locked and open by remote fobs but does not affect the footpath. I’ve just put in directions from the plumbers arms crossroads CB8 8PB on the A143 towards bury st Edmund’s the road from the church crosses the A143 to denston to go to CB8... | |
| 5 | 2025-01-21 07:31 | BCNorwich | Hi, I am assuming you are using the OSM front page map to test the routing:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions#map=16/52.15574/0.56439&layers=N. Please first refresh/reload that webpage in your browser. Now paste in the postcodes. For me the three car routing options work as expected goi... | |
| 6 | 2025-01-22 08:40 | rdude21 ♦1 | That’s brilliant thanks for your help I appreciate it. | |
| 161530372 by Wobbly2732 @ 2025-01-19 16:05 | 1 | 2025-01-20 07:46 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've relocated the AED positions to more suit your location description. Reason being I did not think they were in the path or road center line.Regards Bernard. |
| 161450468 by God Weaam @ 2025-01-17 10:52 | 1 | 2025-01-20 07:24 | BCNorwich | Fictional motorway removed. Please don't corrupt the OSM database. |
| 161481116 by bipin upadhyay @ 2025-01-18 07:50 | 1 | 2025-01-19 08:10 | BCNorwich | Way: 1352277420, Way: 1352277421 are remove as they duplicate existing highways.Regards Bernard. |
| 161481124 by Hemant Chand @ 2025-01-18 07:51 | 1 | 2025-01-19 08:04 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed the highways Way: 1352277435 and Way: 1352277436, mainly because they duplicate existing highways and that the tag highway=road is not an OSM valid tag. Please tag the appropriate highway status tag, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3... |
| 161437793 by smsm1 @ 2025-01-16 23:50 | 1 | 2025-01-18 07:34 | BCNorwich | Hi, Many features dragged out of alignment here, I think I've replaced all of them. |
| 2 | 2025-01-18 08:54 | smsm1 ♦8 | Thanks for sorting, I thought I'd hit undo on all the cases that is managed to drag a larger object accidentally. Based on my phone GPS the road needed a bit of realignment. I'll try and get the trace off the GPS and see if that's more accurate. | |
| 161403518 by Kavi GIS @ 2025-01-16 05:20 | 1 | 2025-01-17 07:36 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 161423029 by Ebadm @ 2025-01-16 15:17 | 1 | 2025-01-17 07:14 | BCNorwich | Hi, Partial revert to reinstate dragged outlines of shops, Beats, Simmons, Oskar. |
| 161419914 by Russell Jacobs @ 2025-01-16 13:44 | 1 | 2025-01-16 19:07 | BCNorwich | Reverted to reinstate post box tags. |
| 161388350 by mattdraddog @ 2025-01-15 16:47 | 1 | 2025-01-15 17:18 | BCNorwich | Hi, Will you be coming back next year to correct the crop tag for each field in this area. If you don't think you can then please don't use the crop tag as next year it will be misleading.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-01-15 17:32 | mattdraddog ♦1 | thank you. noted. I will not update crop type. | |
| 161223985 by M55TAF @ 2025-01-11 00:01 | 1 | 2025-01-11 07:41 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This AED location does not seem correct. I cannot find it on the fitness4less website and the site looks like a private residence.The point of mapping AED's to OSM is to aid the public in accessing the nearest AED in an emergency. Unfortunately this AED lack... |
| 2 | 2025-01-15 08:03 | BCNorwich | No response so I've removed it. | |
| 161317086 by OSM@FPC @ 2025-01-13 16:41 | 1 | 2025-01-14 09:30 | BCNorwich | I tweaked the tags to OSM practice. |
| 161314683 by Mike hinson @ 2025-01-13 15:34 | 1 | 2025-01-14 09:23 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The trig point is returned to its original position. Please be careful not to inadvertently move features, this is a live worldwide database. |
| 161291159 by theoramwell @ 2025-01-12 23:36 | 1 | 2025-01-14 09:06 | BCNorwich | Hi, A few duplicated paths here, I think I've fixed them. |
| 161288397 by LucyMichela19xx @ 2025-01-12 21:34 | 1 | 2025-01-14 08:48 | BCNorwich | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've joined the south end onto Middlesex Road. |
| 161320512 by Philippa Day @ 2025-01-13 18:25 | 1 | 2025-01-14 07:40 | BCNorwich | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've reviewed your additions.Very large area Way: 1350978574 is not a house, I've removed it. Fields unjoined from road center lines. If you zoom right in you can more precisely draw features.Way: Landrace house (1350978577) should be drawn round the h... |
| 161284433 by BCNorwich @ 2025-01-12 19:07 | 1 | 2025-01-13 13:56 | gurglypipe ♦873 | What change were you making here? There’s no changeset comment. :) |
| 2 | 2025-01-13 14:06 | BCNorwich | Oh, Sorry about that, I tweaked a footpath from the common and playing field areas | |
| 3 | 2025-01-13 14:27 | gurglypipe ♦873 | Thanks, that was in Middlesbrough right? There seem to be some changes in Swansea too, meaning this changeset spans most of England | |
| 4 | 2025-01-13 14:38 | BCNorwich | Yes could be, I was having problems uploading this morning. Then went on to look at other things. Kept trying to upload then everything went at once. As I recall there weren't any conflicts so I take it all was OK as far as the data was concerned. | |
| 5 | 2025-01-13 14:52 | gurglypipe ♦873 | Fun times 🙃 | |
| 161181973 by Gamer789 @ 2025-01-09 19:28 | 1 | 2025-01-12 19:06 | BCNorwich | Online shops are not allowed on OSM |
| 2 | 2025-01-13 09:19 | Gamer789 ♦1 | Could you send me the rules please so I can see what is and is not permissible. Thanks. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-13 09:44 | BCNorwich | Hi, Firstly anything added to OSM must be verifiable. OSM verifiability is explained here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/VerifiabilityAn explanation by Frederik Ramm, a leading OSM moderator is given here:- https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/72910/how-should-i-map-an-online-shopping... | |
| 161247059 by Henry Bennett @ 2025-01-11 17:04 | 1 | 2025-01-12 08:03 | BCNorwich | Hi, All land is private whether it has a PRoW is irrelevant. At the moment no PRoW is claimed across this land. If/when a PRoW is claimed then confirmation would be determined upholding or dismissing the claim. |
| 2 | 2025-01-12 08:56 | Henry Bennett ♦1 | Surely this is the wrong way around? I want to remove the track from google maps as it has no legal status. whta you are saying is that it can only be removed when a PRoW is proved. That has to be wrong. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-12 10:08 | BCNorwich | Hi, There's some misunderstanding. Firstly OSM is a database openly maintained by anyone who wants to contribute. The only stipulation to features in the database is that they are ground truth and verifiable by anyone else. You have removed the tracks across that field from the OSM database... | |
| 161250291 by gingermusketeer @ 2025-01-11 18:49 | 1 | 2025-01-12 08:10 | BCNorwich | Hi, The name is not the house number so I've removed that tag.Regards Bernard. |
| 161250208 by gingermusketeer @ 2025-01-11 18:46 | 1 | 2025-01-12 08:07 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreeMap.House 33 is mapped so the node is not needed.Regards Bernard. |
| 161214589 by ay_fife1 @ 2025-01-10 17:35 | 1 | 2025-01-11 07:53 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just to let you know that you've added a huge number of untagged nodes. Could you please look at tagging or removing them? Also, a lot of nodes are outside the building outline.I don't know a lot about indoor mapping, that a specialist area, but are you... |
| 2 | 2025-01-11 12:44 | ay_fife1 ♦1 | Hi Bernard,Thanks for taking the time to look at this edit and for your response.Unfortunately when looking at it I believe my import from OSMinEdit may have corrupted as it appears to have only uploaded the nodes without anything else (internal structures).Luckily I managed to backup th... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-11 14:26 | BCNorwich | Hi, Thanks for responding.I can easily revert the whole changeset to the original OSM state. As you've got a backup I think that's the best thing to do. Would you like me to do this? If so please don't make any further changes until after the revert.Regards Bernard. | |
| 4 | 2025-01-11 14:52 | ay_fife1 ♦1 | Hi Bernard,If you could revert it that would be great, then I'll push up the appropriate one when I get the chance later in the week (taking into account your initial feedback).Thanks for your assistance! | |
| 5 | 2025-01-11 15:35 | BCNorwich | Hi, Thats now reverted. You might need to reload or refresh your browser to see the revert.Regards Bernard. | |
| 161198780 by Williamson432 @ 2025-01-10 10:11 | 1 | 2025-01-10 14:00 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Features added to OSM must be ground truth and verifiable. Thus I've relocated your building from the middle of the highway.Regards Bernard. |
| 161178152 by Tavayo @ 2025-01-09 17:11 | 1 | 2025-01-10 07:54 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've unjoined the residential area from highways and then features.Regards Bernard. |
| 161173353 by GPfA25 @ 2025-01-09 15:02 | 1 | 2025-01-10 07:48 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've joined the path to the road at the south end.Regards Bernard. |
| 161190861 by Trimova Aisha @ 2025-01-10 04:03 | 1 | 2025-01-10 06:51 | BCNorwich | fiction reverted |
| 161190730 by Trimova Aisha @ 2025-01-10 03:54 | 1 | 2025-01-10 06:51 | BCNorwich | reverted fiction |
| 161190697 by Trimova Aisha @ 2025-01-10 03:50 | 1 | 2025-01-10 06:47 | BCNorwich | Fiction removed. |
| 161190517 by Trimova Aisha @ 2025-01-10 03:35 | 1 | 2025-01-10 06:45 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately this changeset dragged lots of features out of alignment. Thus I've reverted it.Please be careful not to damage anything.Regards Bernard. |
| 160266446 by mapeing @ 2024-12-14 01:32 | 1 | 2024-12-18 08:36 | BCNorwich | Hi, You've got 3 buildings numbered 189 High Street This is surely wrong, could you please remedy this?There are also many warnings given above some of them serious that ought be corrected. The 221 warnings of close_nodes:vertices are where you have placed 3 or 4 nodes to indicate a corner ... |
| 2 | 2025-01-09 12:47 | papaj ♦39 | You have mapped multiple 'basic' building's as relations (example 18419955). Is there a reason they have been mapped as relations? | |
| 3 | 2025-01-09 14:14 | BCNorwich | Hi papaj,User papaj doesn't respond, so I've amended those buildings. I had to resolve the other issues I previously pointed out.Regards Bernard | |
| 161017545 by Gamer789 @ 2025-01-05 12:00 | 1 | 2025-01-08 09:43 | BCNorwich | Hi, There doesn't look like this business is located here in the road. Only verifiable ground truth features should be added to the OSM database. So this feature should be properly mapped or removed. Do you need any help?Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-01-09 11:05 | BCNorwich | No response so I've removed it. | |
| 161159179 by mahashringar @ 2025-01-09 07:48 | 1 | 2025-01-09 08:19 | BCNorwich | No park here, fiction removed.Your actions cast the company in a bad light. |
| 161158933 by mahashringar @ 2025-01-09 07:41 | 1 | 2025-01-09 07:58 | BCNorwich | Hi, Your fiction has been reverted. You are welcome to add genuine features to OSM, need help just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 161115076 by Jack Durtnall @ 2025-01-07 23:47 | 1 | 2025-01-08 13:21 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see you've somehow added three defibrillators in close proximity, which doesn't really look right. I would think that the only defibrillator is the one on the car park, is this correct? If so the other two can be removed.Regards Bernard. |
| 161101148 by Dan_Johnston @ 2025-01-07 15:53 | 1 | 2025-01-08 13:08 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Sorry but your landuse=residential area covers a lot of other different types of areas. Thus I've removed it. The tag landuse=residential is used when mapping land areas used only as residential.The boundary line for Marlborough is here:- https://www.openstr... |
| 161073927 by Swingersb69 @ 2025-01-06 20:42 | 1 | 2025-01-08 11:30 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Can you please show or point out the verification as to the permitted bicycle access on these two tank tracks. If there is legal access for cycles I would think there is also pedestrian access. If there's no legal access by statute or permission then folk could ... |
| 161004919 by Idris Propperty Investment @ 2025-01-04 23:12 | 1 | 2025-01-08 09:33 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You actually only dragged the road out of alignment which I've reinstated. Do you need help adding a business?Regards Bernard. |
| 160928280 by Fox of Wellington @ 2025-01-02 22:22 | 1 | 2025-01-08 09:14 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've tweaked the area and joined the drive to Milverton Road.Regards Bernard. |
| 160897197 by MikKent @ 2025-01-02 08:52 | 1 | 2025-01-08 08:38 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reinstated the correct tags to Manor Lane. Also made a few tweaks. Please don't alter the OSM data in order suit personal preferences.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-01-08 09:27 | MikKent ♦1 | I am not sure what you mean OSM data and personal preferences, correct data is what is required. Nothing personal unless you class the house being in the wrong identifiers, the house in google maps appears to be within the confines of the village.Yes OS numbers do tally with the actually house but... | |
| 160869279 by evilmanic @ 2025-01-01 16:02 | 1 | 2025-01-08 08:03 | BCNorwich | Squared up the buildings. |
| 160883617 by BIKERMOUSEFROMMARZ @ 2025-01-01 20:06 | 1 | 2025-01-08 07:51 | BCNorwich | Hi, But cycles are allowed. Please don't alter OSM mapping to suit your GPS navigation. This makes it difficult for those folk who want to navigate a different route. OSM strives to have only verifiable ground truth in the database.Regards Bernard, |
| 2 | 2025-01-08 19:31 | BIKERMOUSEFROMMARZ ♦1 | Thank you for your comments. Regarding 'verifiable ground truth', I live here and can tell you first hand the truth is absolutely verifiable. Thanks for making OSM mapping more viable. | |
| 161058887 by Tahaada @ 2025-01-06 13:52 | 1 | 2025-01-07 08:38 | BCNorwich | Hello, Your new highway Way: شارع ٢٤ 1348997741) does not appear on the imagery you have used. Is this road proposed or under construction?Regards Bernard. |
| 73957390 by MichaelCollinson @ 2019-08-31 20:28 | 1 | 2025-01-07 07:35 | BCNorwich | Hi, I just wanted to inform you that ways 720603345 and 720603350 are untagged.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-01-07 08:04 | MichaelCollinson ♦53 | Thanks Bernard. Corrected!Happy Mapping,Mike | |
| 161067610 by Jeanpmateta @ 2025-01-06 17:23 | 1 | 2025-01-06 18:44 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've unjoined the houses from the path and another area outline. I also squared up the houses. The squareing up of houses is easy with the ideditor. You just highlight/lrft-click the house, then right click and click the square icon, shortcut Q. It's done.\... |
| 160969178 by AnasSUI @ 2025-01-03 22:36 | 1 | 2025-01-05 11:07 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your requested review, I've reverted your changes because you removed the valid farmyard tag and added the fictional tag making the farmyard scrub.Please don't add fiction to the live worldwide OSM database from which hundreds of maps are compiled daily... |
| 160959041 by Tahaada @ 2025-01-03 17:30 | 1 | 2025-01-05 08:57 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed the fords as I believe they are fiction. |
| 160979206 by redwoods @ 2025-01-04 10:13 | 1 | 2025-01-05 08:43 | BCNorwich | Hi, These grass areas don't extend over asphalt roads and paths. Not do they join onto the center lines of highways. Because it would obstruct traffic. Regards Bernard. |
| 160983972 by sjorford @ 2025-01-04 12:39 | 1 | 2025-01-05 08:19 | BCNorwich | Hi, Some of your newly added fences do not seem to make science, fences and gates in the middle of what looks like open fields. Also some fences cross over others with no join. Could you please look at this problem?Regards Bernard. |
| 160967658 by Burzulis @ 2025-01-03 21:42 | 1 | 2025-01-05 06:52 | BCNorwich | Hi, You've got a large wood area Way: 866283146 on top of a large scrub area Way: 1348072288. This doesn't seem logical, I think it should be wood or scrub not both. Could you please re-think these areas.Regards Bernard. |
| 160959607 by Dave1321321 @ 2025-01-03 17:48 | 1 | 2025-01-04 08:07 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've added the address and website, please check.Regards Bernard. |
| 160786995 by newmapper191 @ 2024-12-30 11:12 | 1 | 2025-01-03 09:26 | BCNorwich | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.If it's a farm access road then the tag would be access=agricultural. The tag vehicle:access=no would exclude public vehicles but remember some routers would stop delivery vehicles fro accessing.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-01-03 09:30 | newmapper191 ♦1 | Thanks Bernard. Correct, no delivery vehicles should access this road. | |
| 160709400 by Colin Currie Inn Farm @ 2024-12-28 11:26 | 1 | 2025-01-03 09:14 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.If there is some form of access then the tag access=no would be incorrect. You have added the tag motor_vehicle=no which excludes public vehicle access, that's correct. It looks like the general access tag should be access=agricultural, thus I've amended th... |
| 160707954 by $teve£ @ 2024-12-28 10:45 | 1 | 2025-01-03 09:01 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It's not logical to have foot and cycle access allowed on a highway tagged access+no. I assume you mean the is no vehicle access in which case the tag would be vehicle:access=no. I've amended the tag.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2025-01-03 10:23 | $teve£ ♦1 | Thanks, well spotted | |
| 160892536 by ANOKEY @ 2025-01-02 04:18 | 1 | 2025-01-02 06:44 | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Actually, these highways do connect to a pedestrian area highway, so they are not really disconnected. Whether they are considered routable by apps or by yourself is not reasonable grounds to delete them. Anything that is ground truth and verifiable is welcomed in... |
| 160847923 by Calvin Imray @ 2024-12-31 21:00 | 1 | 2025-01-01 09:03 | BCNorwich | Hi, This again is a designated public footpath, although in this case it looks like the Highway Authority has given permission for cycle use. I've amended the tags.Regards Bernard. |
| 160847845 by Calvin Imray @ 2024-12-31 20:56 | 1 | 2025-01-01 08:54 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The original tags on this highway were correct. It is a designated public footpath extending along Meadowside to Eastwick Drive. So unless there is explicit permission for cycling you are not legally allowed to cycle along here, even though there may be nothing to in... |
| 160600639 by 19White47! @ 2024-12-25 11:44 | 1 | 2024-12-30 19:30 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've tagged the driveway as per OSM practice. I've added the building and tagged that with the name etc. Please make any corrections necessary. Need help please just ask.Regards Bernard. |
| 160727141 by chris-kindling @ 2024-12-28 19:24 | 1 | 2024-12-30 07:54 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You can square up the buildings (they'll look better then). Right-click on the building outline, then click the square icon from the drop-down menu (shortcut Q). Regards Bernard. |
| 160654407 by plonkers @ 2024-12-26 21:34 | 1 | 2024-12-28 06:54 | BCNorwich | Hello, You've been moving boundary lines and leaving a lot of untagged nodes. I've corrected some of these. Could you please check your work to correct any more inadvertent anomalies?Regards Bernard. |
| 160633801 by Liamsquinn @ 2024-12-26 11:54 | 1 | 2024-12-27 12:11 | BCNorwich | They certainly look attached to me. |
| 160551224 by Cameron Ralph Airport Transfers @ 2024-12-23 19:32 | 1 | 2024-12-26 08:03 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It looks like there are a few things wrong here. The building you have added the tags to is a pair of houses. It's unlikely that the company would be situated in a domestic building and highly unlikely to be in two houses. Looking at the website associated with ... |
| 2 | 2024-12-26 09:52 | Cameron Ralph Airport Transfers ♦1 | Good morning I have tried to list my business at 9 Benham close which is one property not two.This is my second branch, it will be updated to the website & also I live & work from the above address. Thanks | |
| 3 | 2024-12-26 10:16 | BCNorwich | Hi, Thanks for responding. I've divided the building into two houses. Which one does your business office occupy, please? Regards Bernard | |
| 4 | 2024-12-26 10:59 | Cameron Ralph Airport Transfers ♦1 | Good morning My property is on the right. Thanks | |
| 5 | 2024-12-26 11:13 | BCNorwich | Hi, Thanks.I've made a few changes to tag the houses and company that seem the most appropriate to OSM practice. Please see if you agree?Regards Bernard. | |
| 6 | 2024-12-26 11:52 | Cameron Ralph Airport Transfers ♦1 | Good morning That is great. Thanks | |
| 160570342 by svinxz @ 2024-12-24 10:45 | 1 | 2024-12-25 11:53 | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I see you've tagged/addressed the whole building as one house. I wonder though if this is actually a residential building of more than one house? I can help with corrections if you wish.Regards Benard. |
| 160174965 by tomascooley @ 2024-12-11 16:09 | 1 | 2024-12-25 07:56 | BCNorwich | Reverted in order to return dragged AED to it's original position.Regards Bernard, |
| 160245826 by tomascooley @ 2024-12-13 13:12 | 1 | 2024-12-25 07:48 | BCNorwich | Hi, Please excuse me for pointing out that proper names should have the first letter of all words capitalised.Regards Bernard. |
| 160168812 by tomascooley @ 2024-12-11 13:26 | 1 | 2024-12-25 07:33 | BCNorwich | Hi, Your new highway Way: 1341801325 is a duplication of an existing highway, Thus I've removed it but placed your new relevant tags on the existing way.If a feature needs amending please do the amendment to the existing feature not merely make a duplication nor remove and redraw. In this w... |
| 160418203 by LocksmithOakville @ 2024-12-20 04:32 | 1 | 2024-12-23 17:02 | BCNorwich | Corrections |
| 160509950 by BCNorwich @ 2024-12-22 17:27 | 1 | 2024-12-22 17:29 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I think you got the tags mixed up with another company. I think I've properly corrected it.Regards Bernard. |
| 160364122 by Calbr21 @ 2024-12-18 18:40 | 1 | 2024-12-21 09:56 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Please be aware that the imagery you used here is probably way out of date. The buildings you deleted were added recently, 18/10/2024, so it's very likey that they do exist. Thus I've reinstated them. Please don't delete anything unless you are persona... |
| 157884862 by Ayush2022 @ 2024-10-14 15:57 | 1 | 2024-12-20 07:59 | BCNorwich | Hi, the tag you've used on all these highway nodes "lane_markings=1" does not make sense. Please see:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q19804 where it states this tag is not applicable, it does not apply to nodes.Also, you have tagged the highways as "lane_markings=... |
| 160197877 by Anon1966 @ 2024-12-12 08:44 | 1 | 2024-12-13 09:29 | BCNorwich | Hi, Something went wrong with several features in this area. Seems to be from a few of your changesets, could you have a look/repair please?Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-12-13 13:16 | Anon1966 ♦2 | New Streets were added which visited and then corrected and the Street look in order now.If i have inadvertenly done something non Streets to buildings then please correct that or advise me how to. Thanks | |
| 3 | 2024-12-18 15:43 | BCNorwich | Hi, All corrected now.Regards Bernard. | |
| 4 | 2024-12-19 16:20 | Anon1966 ♦2 | Thank you | |
| 160224520 by krytenuk @ 2024-12-12 21:41 | 1 | 2024-12-13 08:37 | BCNorwich | Footpath tags tweaked to show correct designations. |
| 160222806 by krytenuk @ 2024-12-12 20:32 | 1 | 2024-12-13 08:18 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended the footpath tags to suit OSM practice, details from the SCC website and maps.Regards Bernard. |
| 160231901 by Rahat Ahmad Awan @ 2024-12-13 05:46 | 1 | 2024-12-13 06:37 | BCNorwich | Tags fixed. |
| 160139983 by DaveF @ 2024-12-10 18:25 | 1 | 2024-12-11 06:38 | BCNorwich | Hi DaveF,Just to let you know there's a self-intersection on Way: 361072443 at the east end.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-12-11 15:23 | DaveF ♦1,566 | Ta | |
| 160140088 by bibi7 @ 2024-12-10 18:29 | 1 | 2024-12-10 19:28 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your new residential area covers an existing residential area, somewhat, Thus I've removed it. If the existing area is Glenvale Estate then please tag the name there.Regards Bernard. |
| 160135634 by D_1510 @ 2024-12-10 16:10 | 1 | 2024-12-10 17:52 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.One section of the path was duplicated which I've removed.Regards Bernard. |
| 160042026 by NebulaOne-Harvey @ 2024-12-07 22:59 | 1 | 2024-12-08 07:32 | BCNorwich | Hi, Features added to OSM must be ground-truth and verifiable. I don't think the business you've added meets this criteria; in fact, it seems fictitious. Could you please verify that the company exists or if not remove it.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-12-08 11:09 | NebulaOne-Harvey ♦1 | Morning,Information sourced from https://nebulaone.org/ - Contact Us section.Thank you. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-08 12:46 | BCNorwich | Hi, That website and the contacts seem to be fiction. Investigation of the website contents lead to disturbing facts. I've amended the OSM database.Regards Bernard. | |
| 160048144 by BCNorwich @ 2024-12-08 08:01 | 1 | 2024-12-08 09:48 | SK53 ♦864 | Hi Bernard, I'd appreciate it if you can avoid editing in this area until Wednesday. The roads around here are a mess and I'm trying to correct them as I can. However, I only have Vespucci with me, and a limited Internet connection so corrections can cause awkward conflicts which I fin... |
| 2 | 2024-12-08 12:35 | BCNorwich | Hi Jerry, I'll bear that in mind. There was a problem flagged on OSM inspector this morning which on correction highlighted to me a few more problems, that was the reason for these changes. Feel free to revert if it will help you.Regards Bernard | |
| 159862723 by Spiffing @ 2024-12-03 00:08 | 1 | 2024-12-03 06:14 | BCNorwich | Hi, There does not look like there is a crossing island from the available imagery. Please confirm there is an island in the middle of the crossing where folk can pause in crossing the road?Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-12-08 08:54 | BCNorwich | No response so amended it to crossing:island=no | |
| 160041972 by NebulaOne-Harvey @ 2024-12-07 22:55 | 1 | 2024-12-08 06:48 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Buildings look neater if squared up and don't have unnecessary extra nodes. In the iD editor, select/highlight the building, left click the mouse, select/click the square icon, shortcut is "Q".Regards Bernard. |
| 160025825 by LuisBoyd @ 2024-12-07 12:44 | 1 | 2024-12-07 15:54 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The warnings above are because you inadvertently dragged a road and bridge out of alignment. No problem though I've restored the highways. Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-12-07 15:56 | LuisBoyd ♦1 | Thanks Bernard New to open street maps thanks for the help much appreciated!best regardsLuis | |
| 159945367 by sovereign_quocda @ 2024-12-05 07:20 | 1 | 2024-12-06 07:43 | BCNorwich | Please take heed and correct the many warnings given above, I've already removed several duplicated highways. |
| 2 | 2024-12-06 07:57 | sovereign_quocda ♦3 | Hi BCNorwich, Thank you again, I had a cyber incident, I'm sincerely sorry for making this mistake, this is my fault and I'm trying not to let this happen again.Best regards,sovereign_quocda | |
| 3 | 2024-12-06 08:52 | BCNorwich | Hi, Thanks for responding. I think everything is OK now. The 40 crossing highway warnings were corrected when the duplicates were removed.I was a bit worried because your changeset was large, 104 features. That would have taken a long time to check through. But as I said I think it's all OK... | |
| 4 | 2024-12-09 01:34 | sovereign_quocda ♦3 | Hi BCNorwich,Thank you with the greatest respect.Regards sovereign_quocda | |
| 159926405 by Mangesh K955 @ 2024-12-04 16:52 | 1 | 2024-12-06 07:44 | BCNorwich | Duplicate highway removed. |
| 159940201 by sovereign_quocda @ 2024-12-05 03:41 | 1 | 2024-12-06 07:38 | BCNorwich | Many duplicated highways removed. |
| 2 | 2024-12-06 07:51 | sovereign_quocda ♦3 | Hi BCNorwich,Thank you for your comment. I apologize for duplicated highways. While I was drawing and updating the map, I experienced network issues that caused the existing roads to disappear. When the network resumed, this resulted in the duplication of highways. I appreciate your understanding ... | |
| 159968595 by B0rkB0i @ 2024-12-05 18:44 Active block | 1 | 2024-12-06 06:48 | BCNorwich | Several features corrected/removed |
| 159968094 by B0rkB0i @ 2024-12-05 18:34 Active block | 1 | 2024-12-06 06:44 | BCNorwich | Fiction removed, |
| 159887607 by M A W1 @ 2024-12-03 16:07 | 1 | 2024-12-05 07:46 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 159876489 by TheHall @ 2024-12-03 11:16 | 1 | 2024-12-03 12:58 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Are you sure this change is correct? As I recall for many years there has been a locked gate across the track and a stile beside it for use on the designated public footpath.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-12-03 13:01 | TheHall ♦1 | There is a locked gate and pedestrians can still pass beside it. There isn't enough room for bikes, horses or cars to pass. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-03 13:04 | BCNorwich | Hello, thanks for responding. Is there still an old stile for folk to climb over. Regards Bernard | |
| 4 | 2024-12-03 13:07 | TheHall ♦1 | No stile, just a gap though the hedge | |
| 159825559 by Caitlyn Procko @ 2024-12-02 02:09 | 1 | 2024-12-03 07:39 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your mapping includes names that describe land areas, so the names are not reality. The areas you've added do not tally with areas on the background imagery. There are so many anomalies that I cannot correct them, so I've reverted the changeset.Name... |
| 159825330 by Caitlyn Procko @ 2024-12-02 01:52 | 1 | 2024-12-03 07:37 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your mapping includes names that describe land areas, so the names are not reality. The areas you've added do not tally with areas on the background imagery. There are so many anomalies that I cannot correct them, so I've reverted the changeset.Names sh... |
| 159800200 by adamchap @ 2024-12-01 10:14 | 1 | 2024-12-01 11:55 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The allotment site outline is already mapped, I've added your new data to the outline as per OSM practice.Regards Bermard. |
| 159791458 by RoystonMapper446554 @ 2024-11-30 23:52 | 1 | 2024-12-01 06:49 | BCNorwich | The original house outlines are reinstated to keep their history, then amended. Please amend/correct existing features, not just delete and redraw.Regards Bernard. |
| 159730733 by Daniel Arter @ 2024-11-29 08:08 | 1 | 2024-11-29 13:21 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended the business's tags to those accepted by the OSM database. Data must be presented in a certain manner in order to be rendered.Regards Bernard. |
| 159685524 by OUSL Nawala @ 2024-11-28 04:56 | 1 | 2024-11-28 10:12 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,402 | Just a test? |
| 2 | 2024-11-29 07:25 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately, your test duplicated features already in the OSM database, so I removed them. Please take time to read the help and beginner guides. Need any help, please just ask.Regards Bernard. | |
| 159708488 by AbdAde @ 2024-11-28 15:40 | 1 | 2024-11-28 17:16 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reverted this changeset because you somehow dragged several features out of alignment, warnings were given above. I have kept the carwash mapped though.Regards Bernard, |
| 159650919 by Andrex88 @ 2024-11-27 09:44 | 1 | 2024-11-28 07:14 | BCNorwich | Hi, You've duplicated a lot of these fence lines between the houses. Fence on top of a fence.Regards Bernards |
| 2 | 2024-11-28 08:09 | Andrex88 ♦3 | A residential garden is a polygon, and it can have the property of "barrier: fence". | |
| 3 | 2024-11-28 09:06 | BCNorwich | You are quite correct about the garden polygon which is an enclosed area feature. But adding the tag barrier=fence to the area feature, then joining another area similarly tagged feature to it makes for two fences on the join which is incorrect. In cases like this, the fence ought to be added as a s... | |
| 4 | 2024-11-28 09:56 | Andrex88 ♦3 | To be honest, when I started doing this I was following the approach used by blackadder (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/blackadder) in Sutton Coldfield, which had been praised by other users. The effective output is to see a land parcel, similar to that which is displayed on the highest detail o... | |
| 159637036 by Dbob0921 @ 2024-11-26 22:38 | 1 | 2024-11-27 06:49 | BCNorwich | Hi, I wonder if you could help, are there fences around every aircraft? As I recall from a long time ago there were no fences.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-11-27 15:28 | Dbob0921 ♦2 | I don't believe so. | |
| 159636658 by Dbob0921 @ 2024-11-26 22:21 | 1 | 2024-11-27 06:41 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Does the Norwich Aviation Centre occupy the whole building as your amendment implies? If not then the business should be mapped as a node within the building. The website address implies the business is within the Airport Park & Ride Building.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-11-27 15:26 | Dbob0921 ♦2 | Hi,It definitely operates the whole building.Best RegardsDavid | |
| 159600522 by BCNorwich @ 2024-11-26 06:36 | 1 | 2024-11-26 16:13 | Bexhill-OSM ♦95 | Thanks. Sometimes JOSM doesn't flag these geometry issues. Is there a tool I can use to check for intersecting ways? |
| 2 | 2024-11-26 18:21 | BCNorwich | Hi, Yes OSM Inspector, here's a link, :- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-0.97797&lat=52.06026&zoom=7&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_wayIt's updated ... | |
| 159601662 by Flanked6968 @ 2024-11-26 07:20 | 1 | 2024-11-26 08:18 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I wonder has Natwest ceased to operate from the building and have the two ATMs on the High Street been removed? If so the map ought to be amended to this effect.Lastly does Gail's occupy the whole building and is it a cafe as well as a bakery.Regards Ber... |
| 2 | 2024-11-26 11:20 | Flanked6968 ♦1 | Yes, the ATMs are gone. I made this change separately through Organic Maps. Also Gail's occupies the whole building and is a cafe too. | |
| 159456630 by Hyebone @ 2024-11-22 12:23 | 1 | 2024-11-24 06:58 | BCNorwich | Hi, When you add steps to a path please section off the path and remove the section where the steps are. Adding the steps like you did here makes duplication of a highway. I've removed the 4 sections of the path here.Regards Bernard. |
| 159412513 by Gowtham@Aatral @ 2024-11-21 14:29 | 1 | 2024-11-22 07:39 | BCNorwich | Hi, The cantonment blocks would not all be named "Cantonment". The overall cantonment area is named/tagged as "Nashik Cantonment" so your building names are not needed. The buildings could be described as individual cantonments but not named cantonments.Regards Bernard. |
| 159395340 by DhammaD @ 2024-11-21 06:36 | 1 | 2024-11-22 07:28 | BCNorwich | Hi, You made lots of duplicated highways here which I've removed. Please try not to do this as it disrupts routing. Check before you upload. Regards Bernard. |
| 159413713 by Edward Young @ 2024-11-21 15:01 | 1 | 2024-11-21 15:52 | BCNorwich | Hi, The business doesn't occupy the whole building so the tags shouldn't go on the building outline. I've made it a POI node within the building outline.Regards Bernard. |
| 159401812 by AnnaHu @ 2024-11-21 10:01 | 1 | 2024-11-21 12:37 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I'm pretty sure that's not a pond, I've reverted it back to grass.Regards Bernard. |
| 159368355 by Gowtham@Aatral @ 2024-11-20 14:26 | 1 | 2024-11-21 08:24 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately, the highways you added are all duplicating existing highways, this could disrupt routing. I've removed all the duplicates.If a mapped feature in OSM needs amending/correcting it's OSM best practice to amend/correct any existing feature. Not... |
| 159389546 by EastLacey123 @ 2024-11-21 00:01 | 1 | 2024-11-21 06:50 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Several tags in OSM are implied by their absence. In the absence of the tag oneway=yes, it is implied that these highways have no one-way restriction. Thus, the tag oneway=no is not needed. There are only a few special exceptions to this guidance.There are thousa... |
| 159344960 by Maryam Haleem @ 2024-11-19 22:31 | 1 | 2024-11-20 06:34 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.That should be building=school, the amenity=school tag is on the overall school grounds outline. I've amended to suit.Regards Bernard. |
| 159280193 by Jason52 @ 2024-11-18 11:57 | 1 | 2024-11-19 06:28 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately you removed the a bridge on the bridleway. Thus I;ve reverted the changeset. I also added the designation of Meadow Lane.Regards Bernard. |
| 159171969 by Joe Gimson @ 2024-11-15 13:59 | 1 | 2024-11-16 15:57 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed Way: 1334240411 and Way: 1334240412 as they duplicate an existing highway. The existing highway is a designated bridleway, I've tagged it as such.Regards Bernard. |
| 159132220 by Vas111 @ 2024-11-14 14:17 | 1 | 2024-11-16 15:15 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highways removed.Way: 1333734915Way: 1333734916Way: 1333589282 |
| 159128960 by Vas111 @ 2024-11-14 12:47 | 1 | 2024-11-16 08:47 | BCNorwich | I've deleted the following highways as they duplicated existing highways thus probably disrupting routing. I think all relations are maintained.Way: 1333719652Way: 1333719651Way: 1333719650Way: 1333719649Way: 1333719648Way: 1333719647Way: 1333719646Way: 1333719645Way: 133371... |
| 2 | 2024-11-16 15:10 | BCNorwich | More duplicated ways as above comment.Way: 1333719628Way: 1333719629Way: 1333719630Way: 1333719633Way: 1333719631Way: 1333719627 | |
| 159138489 by DodoTheDev @ 2024-11-14 16:52 | 1 | 2024-11-16 08:03 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed duplicated sections of highways at the bridges. Also amended to way to be one with the old railway.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-11-19 10:45 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | @DodoTheDev Thanks for tidying this up. I've removed a bit more of the duplication to the west and also joined up a gap there - http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=151858&noCache=true&_noCache=on | |
| 3 | 2024-11-19 10:46 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Actually - one more question - does the cycleway really join the top of the bridge at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9396732243 ? | |
| 159133120 by Fahmid5987 @ 2024-11-14 14:40 | 1 | 2024-11-14 14:57 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You can square buildings up in the iD editor, shortcut Q. They'll look much neater.Regards Bernard. |
| 159117072 by KLs1 @ 2024-11-14 06:40 | 1 | 2024-11-14 08:21 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've corrected a few street names for you. The house numbers don't seem right, several are duplicated. Could you please correct these? Regards Bernard. |
| 158982007 by Doc Géofan @ 2024-11-10 19:11 | 1 | 2024-11-14 07:35 | BCNorwich | Many duplicated highways removed. Please be careful not to make more. |
| 2 | 2024-11-18 17:41 | Doc Géofan ♦1 | Thank you @BCNorwich , i remember That i had unintentionally duplicated the tab of my browser. In the end i didn't understand why i had to revalidate everything a second time. Thank you for correcting it! It won't happen again!And sorry for my poor english. | |
| 158197075 by Esabela @ 2024-10-22 06:32 | 1 | 2024-11-14 07:23 | BCNorwich | Hi, These areas you've mapped are not building outlines nor are they named "building". Could you please make corrections or remove the areas.Regards Bernard. |
| 159046181 by Rohitk@2424 @ 2024-11-12 11:34 | 1 | 2024-11-13 07:21 | BCNorwich | Your duplicated highway has been removed. |
| 158950418 by philipcullen @ 2024-11-09 22:04 | 1 | 2024-11-11 15:00 | BCNorwich | Hi, lots of area outlines dragged out of shape, I've repaired a lot. There maybe more I can't see right now.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-11-11 20:50 | philipcullen ♦9 | Not quite sure what happened there - but that was a good spot. Thank you for fixing them. | |
| 158698692 by Pibby59 @ 2024-11-03 13:13 | 1 | 2024-11-07 20:18 | tomhukins ♦217 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479672089 is now tagged as bridge=yes and ford=yes but it seems unlikely both a bridge and a ford exist here. Instead of using common sense it would help to map what exists here on the ground. |
| 2 | 2024-11-11 12:32 | BCNorwich | REverted to a ford as shown on OS map. | |
| 158630919 by Pibby59 @ 2024-11-01 18:07 | 1 | 2024-11-11 12:25 | BCNorwich | The spelling was correct. |
| 158589008 by Pibby59 @ 2024-10-31 16:28 | 1 | 2024-11-11 11:37 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've reverted this changeset because the whole pathway is named in the hiking route relation South West Coast Path (Section 36: Plymouth to Wembury Point) (2376012).Also, OSM practice is not to abbreviate formal names.Regards Bernard. |
| 158576425 by Pibby59 @ 2024-10-31 11:08 | 1 | 2024-10-31 17:04 | ceirios ♦49 | Helo Pibby59 a chroeso i OpenStreetMap!I just want to let you know that you can press Q on your keyboard (or Right-Click and Square) to square up the corners of buildings. I also notice that you've traced the roof as it appears on the imagery - you should only trace the footprint of the bui... |
| 2 | 2024-11-11 11:31 | BCNorwich | Tweaked it! | |
| 158574680 by Pibby59 @ 2024-10-31 10:20 | 1 | 2024-11-11 07:47 | BCNorwich | tweaked shapes |
| 158571903 by Pibby59 @ 2024-10-31 08:58 | 1 | 2024-11-11 07:26 | BCNorwich | Repositioned and tagged. |
| 158570193 by Pibby59 @ 2024-10-31 08:02 | 1 | 2024-11-11 06:57 | BCNorwich | Hi, It is OSM practice not to use abbreviations for names, I've changed Rd to Road.Regards Bernard. |
| 158633687 by elmwav @ 2024-11-01 19:30 | 1 | 2024-11-02 07:15 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Features added to OSM must be accurate and verifiable. I can find nothing showing that this business is positioned on the street here. Can you please provide the company's address so it can be properly positioned?A business that has only an online presence t... |
| 2 | 2024-11-10 07:40 | BCNorwich | No response so I've removed it. | |
| 158873593 by Mikail_28 @ 2024-11-07 22:00 | 1 | 2024-11-09 07:32 | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Requested review, I think you should study the beginners and help sections before making more edits.Unfortunately, your mapping mostly duplicated highways, which disrupted routing. Thus, I've reverted the whole changeset. If you need help please ask.\... |
| 158636165 by mapbear66 @ 2024-11-01 20:41 | 1 | 2024-11-08 07:31 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed the 4.5km track Way: 1329989424 as it duplicates the existing track and might disrupt routing.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-11-10 10:50 | mapbear66 ♦25 | Good, I think. Not sure how I would have created a duplicate, but it looks fine now you've been through!Thanks. | |
| 158861837 by SMc13 @ 2024-11-07 15:59 | 1 | 2024-11-07 18:00 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've tweaked the address to suit OSM practice and squared up the shape.Regards Bernard |
| 158802291 by uplayedurself @ 2024-11-06 03:49 | 1 | 2024-11-07 07:19 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed several sections of duplicated track that you added. These track features look more like field boundary lines than tracks, at best they would only be paths IMO.Regards Bernard |
| 158829789 by CALDER IW @ 2024-11-06 18:55 | 1 | 2024-11-07 06:22 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reverted this changeset because the fairways are already mapped,Regards Bernard, |
| 158767825 by kintesh @ 2024-11-05 07:43 | 1 | 2024-11-05 08:22 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.No need to have the business feature mapped twice, I removed the name from the building outline leaving the node as a business POI.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-11-05 09:35 | kintesh ♦1 | Thank you for updating me. | |
| 158546746 by laurieesdale @ 2024-10-30 15:22 | 1 | 2024-10-30 17:24 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It's OSM practice not to map a feature twice. So if the museum is a business within this building it should be mapped/tagged as a node only, leaving the building mapped/tagged with only the building info. If the museum the whole building then the building is map... |
| 2 | 2024-11-02 18:34 | BCNorwich | I found the website, looks like it's the whole building, consolidated tags on building | |
| 158544636 by BooDadley @ 2024-10-30 14:33 | 1 | 2024-10-30 17:31 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The square is already mapped and named as an outline of the whole pedestrian area, Relation: Market Square (12935230). If this is correct, then your new node is not needed as it duplicates data.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-11-01 07:58 | BooDadley ♦1 | BernardThanks for the feedback. After I added my label I did then see a label for Market Square but it seemed to be in the wrong location and I couldn’t see how to move or edit the existing label. Market Square is specifically the paved area with the trees in it between the Civic C... | |
| 3 | 2024-11-01 08:25 | BCNorwich | Hello Julian,Your explanation seems logical given the other areas. I've removed Market Square from the area outline leaving your POI, and added a website for the square.Regards Bernard. | |
| 158549393 by andrewsglassherts @ 2024-10-30 16:24 | 1 | 2024-10-30 19:46 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OenStreetMap.You mapped the business on a block of terrace houses. From your website I found the correct place of the business and placed a node there.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-10-30 19:47 | BCNorwich | Oh I reverted your changes. | |
| 158483305 by BCNorwich @ 2024-10-29 06:31 | 1 | 2024-10-29 09:33 | citrula ♦859 | There's still some leftover stuff from changeset 158317495 which looks dubious. |
| 2 | 2024-10-29 11:40 | BCNorwich | Hello citrula,I think whats left is OK. I can't tell if the house name is correct nor do I have info on the solar installation.Regards Bernard. | |
| 158317495 by Mason Palmatier @ 2024-10-25 00:21 | 1 | 2024-10-29 06:31 | BCNorwich | Remove obvious fiction. |
| 157724581 by The_Long_Named_Loser @ 2024-10-10 16:44 | 1 | 2024-10-11 06:25 | BCNorwich | Hello, Please be aware that the tag highway=road is a temporary tag. See this page for an explanation:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3DroadThis page gives descriptions of all valid highway tags:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highwayRegards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-10-27 13:21 | The_Long_Named_Loser ♦6 | so... in cases where i am unsure on the type of road, should i just guess the best fit ? | |
| 3 | 2024-10-27 14:24 | BCNorwich | Hi, Yes, based on what you consider the road is used for.Regards Bernard. | |
| 158352482 by Rob_Verhoef @ 2024-10-25 19:39 | 1 | 2024-10-27 08:15 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've reverted this changeset as all the highways are duplicates of existing highways. I also removed duplicated building outlines.Regards Bernard. |
| 158340159 by Vas111 @ 2024-10-25 14:19 | 1 | 2024-10-27 08:02 | BCNorwich | Hi, Duplicate highways placed atop of Way: 1328162355 are removed.Regards Bernard. |
| 158340599 by Vas111 @ 2024-10-25 14:29 | 1 | 2024-10-27 07:58 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed duplicated sections of highway on the A920 roundabout, adjusting the bus routes to suit.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-10-27 13:54 | Vas111 ♦84 | Hi, thank you, it seems Relatify creates duplicate ways quite often. | |
| 158354541 by 小智智 @ 2024-10-25 20:44 | 1 | 2024-10-27 07:39 | BCNorwich | Hi,I've amended the layer tag on the steps Way: 1327955681 and sectioned them up to show the relevant height positions, which is atop which.Regards Bernard. |
| 158335311 by fir3x @ 2024-10-25 12:31 | 1 | 2024-10-25 14:32 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Actually, the path is layer=0 as it is at ground level and neither over nor under any other feature. In the absence of any layer tag the layer is implied to be layer=0, so in this case there's no need for a layer tag. I've removed the layer tag, I tweaked t... |
| 158227289 by madbilly @ 2024-10-22 19:55 | 1 | 2024-10-23 05:55 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've tweaked the tags to show the path starts on a driveway. Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-10-23 09:41 | madbilly ♦1 | Hi Bernard, thank you for the review and the update. You're right, but how did you work out which bit was track and which was path?! | |
| 3 | 2024-10-23 13:07 | BCNorwich | Hello madbilly,The Bing, Esri and Mapbox imagery show the driveway in various degrees of distinction. I estimated where I thought the drive would end, I then also checked on the GCC interactive map which shows PRoWs here:- https://gcc.dynamicmaps.co.uk/MapThatPublic/Default.aspxIf I can help... | |
| 4 | 2024-10-31 11:06 | madbilly ♦1 | Hi Bernard, thanks for explaining. I didn't know about those sources, the GCC PRoW one is the only one I can access, seems very useful.Kind regards,Will | |
| 158152483 by sovereign_duytnt @ 2024-10-21 04:24 | 1 | 2024-10-23 07:20 | BCNorwich | Hello,You're making quite a lot of mistakes here, please see the warnings given above. I've removed several duplicated highways that disrupted routing.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-10-23 07:28 | sovereign_duytnt ♦1 | Sorry for this mistake. I will pay more attention next time, thank you very much. | |
| 158199047 by Mail Boxes Etc Aldgate @ 2024-10-22 07:36 | 1 | 2024-10-22 11:00 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.This company is already mapped within this building. I've added the phone number to the existing node and removed your duplicate node. Please make any corrections to existing features.Regards Bernard. |
| 158082120 by Moosington @ 2024-10-19 09:51 | 1 | 2024-10-19 11:20 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You have tagged these highways as having no access for pedestrians. Can you please state where it is stated/shown that foot access is prohibited? There is indeed no footway here but that does not imply no foot access.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-10-19 13:11 | Moosington ♦1 | Hi BernardThis road has 60mph heavy traffic and and is unsafe for foot traffic, but is showing up on my run mapping software as a possible route. Other similar A roads nearby don't.Apologies if foot: no is an inappropriate change. I'd be ever so grateful if you could suggest a bett... | |
| 3 | 2024-10-19 13:49 | BCNorwich | Hi, Thanks for responding. Then the tag foot=no is incorrect and should be removed. Thus I've reverted the changes.Your running route map software is where the problem lies, but I suspect it routes you onto this road because it can find no suitable alternative. A tag that states ground trut... | |
| 157984123 by dayglovikin @ 2024-10-16 21:24 | 1 | 2024-10-17 06:51 | BCNorwich | Hi, Can you please point to your information that says bicycles and foot are not allowed on the A13?It's true there is no formal footway, but does not mean you are not to walk there.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-10-19 11:27 | BCNorwich | No response so I've reverted the changes. | |
| 157683034 by HARI VIKNESH @ 2024-10-09 17:37 | 1 | 2024-10-19 07:00 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You are placing sections of footpath on top of other highways. This is duplication and it could cause disruption to routing, please stop doing this. Regards Benard. |
| 157958739 by tommothy @ 2024-10-16 10:48 | 1 | 2024-10-18 06:19 | BCNorwich | Fiction removed. |
| 157983394 by dayglovikin @ 2024-10-16 20:53 | 1 | 2024-10-17 06:31 | BCNorwich | There is access, it's private access. |
| 157983062 by dayglovikin @ 2024-10-16 20:41 | 1 | 2024-10-17 06:20 | BCNorwich | Hi, Just to let you know that cycle and foot use on a restricted byway are designated forms of use. Hamilton Way is a Public Right of Way designated as a Restricted Byway Stowmarket RB 9. I've reinstated the tags.Regards Bernard. |
| 157982885 by dayglovikin @ 2024-10-16 20:36 | 1 | 2024-10-17 05:42 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed this path because you somehow placed it over houses and in a river. Warnings were given above.Regards Bernard. |
| 157936105 by Richard Carden @ 2024-10-15 19:37 | 1 | 2024-10-16 06:37 | BCNorwich | Hi, You made quite a few duplicated highways here, one was even quadrupled. Unfortunately this could disrupt routing. I think I've removed all the duplicated sections.Regards Bernard. |
| 157878247 by Somt map @ 2024-10-14 13:33 | 1 | 2024-10-15 06:50 | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately your paths were duplications of existing highways with problems as per the warnigs given above. Thus I've removed them.Regards Bernard |
| 157695020 by Xuanhao Mark Zhang @ 2024-10-10 01:53 | 1 | 2024-10-12 07:38 | BCNorwich | Hi, Many fictional features removed. |
| 157581071 by pixy @ 2024-10-07 12:53 | 1 | 2024-10-12 07:08 | BCNorwich | Hi, I noticed you placed long sections of footpath on top of existing highways. This makes for highway duplication which could disrupt routing. I've removed all the duplications and amended the tags on the existing highways to reflect the footpath RoW status.If a way needs amending/correcti... |
| 157560219 by jordie8396 @ 2024-10-06 23:16 | 1 | 2024-10-08 07:09 | BCNorwich | Hi, Sorry to say that you've duplicated several sections of highways placing a highway directly on top of another highway. The duplication will probably disrupt routing. I would normally correct these but there are a lot of relations involved which are mixed between the duplicated highways. So,... |
| 2 | 2024-10-08 12:48 | jordie8396 ♦3 | Hi, I did not realise duplicates of highway ways had been created - I believed most the work I've been doing was relations only. Thanks for information me, I shall go through and check the issues!Regards Jordan | |
| 3 | 2024-10-12 05:49 | BCNorwich | Hi, Thanks for sorting out the duplicated highways.There remains only one problem area here:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/107321#map=17/53.486440/-1.048658 There are duplicated highways on the roundabout and sections missing from relation 107321Regards Bernard. | |
| 157695677 by sovereign_quocda @ 2024-10-10 02:46 | 1 | 2024-10-11 06:39 | BCNorwich | Hi, Please don't place a highway on top of another highway. It's duplication that could disrupt routing.I've just removed 20 duplicated highways that you added, please try to avoid doing this. Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-11-26 03:08 | sovereign_quocda ♦3 | Hi BCNorwich.I apologize for the mistake regarding the duplicated highways. Placing highways on top of each other can indeed cause issues with routing and navigation. I will ensure to avoid such errors in the future and double-check my work to maintain accuracy.Thank you for bringing this to... | |
| 157577102 by Lianne06 @ 2024-10-07 11:17 | 1 | 2024-10-09 06:35 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I am sorry to say that your attempt to show the diversion introduced a fictional duplicated highway with many warnings, as above shown above, which could disrupt routing.A better way is to show the bridge as restriced/closed, then routing will take account and fo... |
| 157647290 by CreativeSEOHub @ 2024-10-08 21:50 | 1 | 2024-10-09 05:31 | BCNorwich | Placed at number 28, repositioned. |
| 157569833 by ServiceOS @ 2024-10-07 08:10 | 1 | 2024-10-07 10:48 | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your website says your office is at North Harrow quite some distance away from this position. If it's within a multi office building it should be mapped as a node within the building, not a line. Thus I've removed it.If you need help please comment h... |
| 157554311 by G0009 @ 2024-10-06 19:03 | 1 | 2024-10-07 06:11 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reinstated the name, please web search the phrase "Pauls Knob, peak" for evidence in several instances.Regards Bernard. |
| 157486152 by Edel720 @ 2024-10-05 06:56 | 1 | 2024-10-06 07:16 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway Way: 1320947296 removed.Regards Bernard. |
| 157472887 by Ayumu "Osaka" Kasuga @ 2024-10-04 18:05 Active block | 1 | 2024-10-06 07:08 | BCNorwich | Hi, Again, there are many duplicated sections of highways and many unconnected crossing highways. I've corrected all the problems I can see.Regards Bernard. |
| 157473429 by Ayumu "Osaka" Kasuga @ 2024-10-04 18:24 Active block | 1 | 2024-10-06 06:49 | BCNorwich | Hi, Placing a highway section on top of another highway section is duplication. There are no highways on top of other highways, please section up the highways as you map them to avoid duplication.I've removed all the duplications I can see.Regards Bernard. |
| 157454765 by ayobawa @ 2024-10-04 10:39 | 1 | 2024-10-05 06:07 | BCNorwich | Hello, I'm sorry to say there are a lot of mistakes that you've made in London mapping. I've reverted all your changesets in London because they duplicated many buildings. Please do not upload like this as it's fictional and could be looked at as vandalism. Regards Bernard. |
| 157346465 by haddinohaddi @ 2024-10-01 16:00 | 1 | 2024-10-02 07:11 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highways and fiction bridge removed. |
| 157334333 by tidyproperties @ 2024-10-01 11:23 | 1 | 2024-10-01 13:16 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reverted your changes because I would not think your company operates from all six houses. I actually think it might be a house the other side of the road.Regards Bernard. |
| 157147523 by Micaela Groke @ 2024-09-26 22:03 | 1 | 2024-09-28 06:23 | BCNorwich | Fictional highways removed. |
| 157148361 by Clare R @ 2024-09-26 22:35 | 1 | 2024-09-28 06:21 | BCNorwich | Fiction motorway removed. |
| 157156863 by City Print by Atlantis Print @ 2024-09-27 07:03 | 1 | 2024-09-27 07:24 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended the opening hours to suit OSM practice.Regards Bernard. |
| 157112812 by Ayush_patil @ 2024-09-26 07:19 | 1 | 2024-09-27 05:58 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed your 2 sections of Main Road because they duplicate existing highways, duplication can cause problems with routing.Regards Bernard. |
| 157137073 by GeorgieFeakin @ 2024-09-26 16:17 | 1 | 2024-09-26 16:34 | BCNorwich | A lot of these buildings have been duplicated, I think I've removed all duplicates. |
| 157129858 by Sally NSAR @ 2024-09-26 13:45 | 1 | 2024-09-26 14:18 | BCNorwich | Hi, Your new buildings would be look better if they were squared up. If you zoom in you can more precisely outline the buildings, then highlight/select the outline, right click menu, click the square icon, (shortcut Q).Regards Bernard. |
| 157113449 by Simon Widd1 @ 2024-09-26 07:36 | 1 | 2024-09-26 11:10 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.The access=private tag on it's own is all that's needed it implies that all forms of access are private and there is no public access. Regards Bernard. |
| 157078114 by SwamiPawan @ 2024-09-25 11:44 | 1 | 2024-09-26 07:06 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed the path because it duplicates an existing highway. |
| 157076820 by SwamiPawan @ 2024-09-25 11:13 | 1 | 2024-09-26 07:02 | BCNorwich | please see previu]ous changeset comment. |
| 157076568 by SwamiPawan @ 2024-09-25 11:07 | 1 | 2024-09-26 07:01 | BCNorwich | Hi, Suspicious names have been removed. Please only map formal or verifiable names for buildings.Squaring up the buildings makes them better presented.Regards Bernard. |
| 157077788 by SwamiPawan @ 2024-09-25 11:35 | 1 | 2024-09-26 06:51 | BCNorwich | Hi, Your fictional duplicated highway has been removed. |
| 157030465 by gandgfencing @ 2024-09-24 09:31 | 1 | 2024-09-24 10:41 | rskedgell ♦1,481 | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business.There are a couple of things you might want to change:1) position - you are unlikely to be in the middle of the junction of Balloch Road/Ardoch Road and POIs which are "obviously" in the wrong place might get deleted by o... |
| 2 | 2024-09-24 11:26 | BCNorwich | Hi, Just a bit more help, your premises can be easily seen on the Bing or Esri imagery in the iD editor. In that editor the Bing imagery can be selected via the Background Settings button on the right side of the page.The location is better placed on the website store locator. | |
| 156970798 by ceirios @ 2024-09-22 22:06 | 1 | 2024-09-24 07:22 | BCNorwich | Hi, On the roundabout, of which Way: Llantrisant Road (1317471353) is a part, there are now several duplicated sections of highway. The route relations are mixed up in the duplicated sections. This will cause disruption to routing. Could you please try to remedy the problems? I don't have e... |
| 2 | 2024-09-24 18:43 | ceirios ♦49 | Hi BernardThanks for pointing it out! Will try and rectify when I can - not sure how that happened in Relatify though.DiolchCeirios | |
| 156954071 by JohnBillett @ 2024-09-22 14:24 | 1 | 2024-09-24 06:39 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed several duplicated highways that you mapped. Please if an existing way needs amending/correcting do the edit to the existing way. Thus the ways history remains. Placing a footpath on top of a service road duplicates the highway which can disrupt... |
| 2 | 2024-09-24 13:44 | JohnBillett ♦1 | Hi Bernard,This was my first attempt at editing OpenStreetMap, so apologies if I did anything wrong and thanks for taking the time in correcting it. I do not recall duplicating or adding any new highways (apart from one, where the marked official path is heavily overgrown and all the locals walk a... | |
| 156995019 by Brook Farm Cuffley @ 2024-09-23 13:04 | 1 | 2024-09-23 14:02 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Just a couple of things, firstly all land in the UK is private, in that it is owned by someone. So there's no real need to point your private land. We map ground truth in OSM so I've retagged the name as a description and moved the tag to the relation a... |
| 156968091 by NKF Hair Salon @ 2024-09-22 20:18 | 1 | 2024-09-23 05:24 | BCNorwich | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've amended your mapping to suit OSM practice. Is the shop Elms Trophies & Engravers still operating from your address? If not it should be removed.Regards Bernard. |
| 156782987 by d2dd3asq211 @ 2024-09-18 16:45 | 1 | 2024-09-21 07:30 | BCNorwich | Hello, You are making things a lot worse instead of better. The problems I mentioned before have not been addressed and you've moved the admin boundary again. You also now have a drain joined to a highway, and highways layer=0 joined to a bridge layer=1.Regards Bernard. |
| 155268335 by BCNorwich @ 2024-08-15 06:40 | 1 | 2024-09-20 09:00 | Maksim Sazanovich ♦9 | Hello, BCNorwich! During my mapping I discovered that a section of the road on Bilberry Wood was removed by you. In the comment to the changeset you wrote that you removed a duplicate section. Tell me please, was the full removal of this section of the road correct or it should have remained after y... |
| 2 | 2024-09-20 12:11 | BCNorwich | Hi, Thanks for letting me know about this. It was my fault, I removed the long original way instead of the short section of new way. I've reinstated the way. Regards Bernard. | |
| 156780072 by Pen y Cae @ 2024-09-18 15:40 | 1 | 2024-09-20 07:09 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Unfortunately you mapped your three paths on top of existing highways. This would disrupt routing. I've removed the duplicate highways and amended the existing highways tags to show them used by foot.Regards Bernard. |
| 156294858 by Robert Putt @ 2024-09-06 22:52 | 1 | 2024-09-08 06:22 | BCNorwich | Hi, there are problems with self-intersecting ways here starting with Way: 1313870887 |
| 2 | 2024-09-20 06:34 | BCNorwich | No response, so as there were several self-intersections which could not be resolved without making even more problems I removed Way: 1313870887.The corridor needs to be mapped without self-intersections, perhaps in several sections or multipolygons.Regards Bernard. | |
| 156826237 by AlunMW @ 2024-09-19 15:26 | 1 | 2024-09-19 18:43 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.That; 's the outline of a building part, the building address tags are already on the building outline.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-09-19 19:50 | AlunMW ♦1 | Thanks Bernard, I didn't intend to add a building part. It's really quite difficult to find the entity for the whole building, but I have now done so, and have corrected the postcode, which is PE1 1XB. It would be helpful if the church name were just "St John's Church" a... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-20 06:17 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've made a few tweaks to address your points and amended some tags to suit OSM practice.Regards Bernard. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-20 07:58 | AlunMW ♦1 | Thanks! | |
| 156826809 by metallion @ 2024-09-19 15:36 | 1 | 2024-09-19 18:33 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.That's an agricultural storage pad, even if folk park there it's not a car park.Regards Bernard. |
| 156502822 by d2dd3asq211 @ 2024-09-11 20:52 | 1 | 2024-09-12 06:39 | BCNorwich | Hi, I wonder has the warehouse and the parking building been built? If so, there are problems in that the buildings are partly on top of highways, roads and a footpath.Or is this a proposed site?Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-09-18 15:49 | BCNorwich | Hi, I think these changes need to be reverted because as well as the problems I mentioned above you've also drawn the buildings over and on top of your some highways. You also dragged an admin boundary off its line.Could you please respond as soon as possible.Regards Bernard. | |
| 156661460 by sloerunner @ 2024-09-15 19:33 | 1 | 2024-09-17 06:35 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed these three highways as they are duplications of existing highways that are part of relations:-Way: Ashwell Street (1315770427), Way: Ashwell Street (1315770428) Way: Ashwell Street (1315770426) |
| 156571115 by Rubesh Krish @ 2024-09-13 12:59 | 1 | 2024-09-15 14:41 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed. |
| 156588804 by Mp300 @ 2024-09-13 20:52 | 1 | 2024-09-14 07:42 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed long lengths of duplicated footpaths you added and corrected all of the warnings given above.Please don't draw a highway on top of an existing highway, it disrupts routing. I a highway needs correcting please correct/amend the existing highway.Regards Bernard.W... |
| 156512566 by department of geography @ 2024-09-12 06:31 | 1 | 2024-09-13 07:20 | BCNorwich | Duplicated features removed |
| 156406084 by DeliciousLancashireHotpot @ 2024-09-09 17:28 | 1 | 2024-09-11 07:09 | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I know you have good intentions for adding Sheffield Road Cycleway but unfortunately, there are many problems. There are 18 warnings of crossing highways as stated above. This is because a large part of the new highway (SRC) is placed on top of the existing cyclew... |
| 2 | 2024-09-11 13:00 | DeliciousLancashireHotpot ♦1 | Hi Bernard,Very much a newby so happy to defer to your better judgement. So I can learn, what should I have done to get these shown as seperate cycle tracks (such as the Attercliffe Cycleway is adjacent to Woodburn Road in Sheffield). Many Thanks David | |
| 3 | 2024-09-12 07:14 | BCNorwich | Hi David, The cycleway section you refer to has been drawn on it's right and separate from the main carriageway. Woodburn Road is not tagged as having a cycleway on either side.To make your Sheffield Road Cycleway similar to the Attercliffe Cycleway you would have to amend the relevant sect... | |
| 4 | 2024-09-12 07:21 | BCNorwich | Hi, I now see that your new cycleway Way: 1314420827 is tagged as layer=-1 which means it's below ground level. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layerRegards Bernard. | |
| 5 | 2024-09-12 21:44 | DeliciousLancashireHotpot ♦1 | Hi Bernard,Thank you for the explanation. I just wanted the .apologies to be able to show the segregated cycleway, but clearly do not know enough to contribute, really sorry. Very happy for you to revert as I'm clearly getting it wrong. Thanks for your help. David | |
| 6 | 2024-09-13 07:03 | BCNorwich | Hello David,I've reverted the changeset so all is now well with routing, there are no duplicated highways.As for the query about segregated cycleway. Regarding Way: Sheffield Road (449060625) which has the tag cycleway:both=track, (and any similarly tagged highway), the tag sidewalk=both... | |
| 156503163 by d2dd3asq211 @ 2024-09-11 21:05 | 1 | 2024-09-12 06:11 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've retagged the premises disused:amenity=school as per OSM practice. |
| 156444411 by Aby VAST @ 2024-09-10 14:44 | 1 | 2024-09-11 08:31 | BCNorwich | Hi, You have 90 warnings about highway problems here as stated above. Also you later drew a building directly on top of some of the footpaths.Can you please correct these problems?Regards Bernard. |
| 156421398 by kodithuwakku @ 2024-09-10 04:51 | 1 | 2024-09-11 08:23 | BCNorwich | Node removed, the islet is already mapped, and I've added your new tags to the existing islet. |
| 156421788 by kodithuwakku @ 2024-09-10 05:06 | 1 | 2024-09-11 08:16 | BCNorwich | Reverted, the hotel and the several bars/restaurants are already mapped. |
| 156422239 by kodithuwakku @ 2024-09-10 05:23 | 1 | 2024-09-11 08:11 | BCNorwich | Reverted duplication. |
| 156422367 by kodithuwakku @ 2024-09-10 05:29 | 1 | 2024-09-11 08:04 | BCNorwich | The boundary already exists and the relevant relations hold the descriptive tags. I've reverted/removed. |
| 156422676 by kodithuwakku @ 2024-09-10 05:44 | 1 | 2024-09-11 07:58 | BCNorwich | Deleted highway reinstated. |
| 156423334 by kodithuwakku @ 2024-09-10 06:12 | 1 | 2024-09-11 07:43 | BCNorwich | Requested Review, There are many problems mostly your addition of fiction. I'll revert the changeset.Please don't add fiction or corrupt the database.Regards Bernard. |
| 156405890 by JSNCC @ 2024-09-09 17:23 | 1 | 2024-09-09 18:39 | BCNorwich | The changeset was reverted as FP 5 was already mapped. |
| 156405428 by JSNCC @ 2024-09-09 17:13 | 1 | 2024-09-09 18:35 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've reverted this changeset as FP 16 is already mapped.Regards Bernard. |
| 156405286 by JSNCC @ 2024-09-09 17:10 | 1 | 2024-09-09 18:31 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've reverted this changeset because the highway you added was already mapped. Thus, the new highway was a duplication that could disrupt routing.Could you explain what you were trying to do, perhaps I could help.Regards Bernard. |
| 156333749 by JeffreyS072513 @ 2024-09-08 02:13 | 1 | 2024-09-09 07:17 | BCNorwich | review_requested, If you zoom in you can more precisely map buildings. You can also square them up in the iD editor. They will then look much neater and more like the imagery provided. Don't join buildings unless you know they are joined.Regards Bernard. |
| 156333882 by JeffreyS072513 @ 2024-09-08 02:26 | 1 | 2024-09-09 07:14 | BCNorwich | Hi, Can you please fix the many instances of crossing highways as warned about above? |
| 156332672 by JeffreyS072513 @ 2024-09-08 00:31 | 1 | 2024-09-09 07:11 | BCNorwich | Hi, Please heed the warnings given on upload and stated above. I've removed the stream Way: 1314070245 as it duplicated an existing stream which actually has more detail tags. |
| 156332658 by JeffreyS072513 @ 2024-09-08 00:30 | 1 | 2024-09-09 07:09 | BCNorwich | Please heed any and all warnings before given before uploading and as stated above. I've removed these two fictional motorways mainly because they duplicate an existing highway. |
| 156195644 by ratrun @ 2024-09-04 16:39 | 1 | 2024-09-06 06:45 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed two highways that you placed on top of existing highways, Way: 1313007960 and Way: 1313007939. This duplication disrupts routing.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2024-09-07 05:17 | ratrun ♦233 | Thanks, it seems I overlooked some, probably because of the amount of the problems in this area. | |
| 156189490 by mossman @ 2024-09-04 14:15 | 1 | 2024-09-06 06:33 | BCNorwich | Hi, Please be advised that you've placed most of Way: 1313259461 on top of existing highways. This is highway duplication that could disrupt routing. Could you please remove your duplication.Secondly, is the junction Queens Gardens to Storkport Road correct with button operated crossing lig... |
| 146195931 by Teej93 @ 2024-01-12 21:15 | 1 | 2024-09-05 06:41 | BCNorwich | Hi, These areas aren't houses they are residential areas. They should be reduced to individual house areas.Regards Bernard. |
| 156130057 by FatGav @ 2024-09-03 08:01 | 1 | 2024-09-04 07:28 | BCNorwich | Hi, There were several sections of duplicated highways introduced to the database by this changeset. I think I've corrected all the problems.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-09-04 08:20 | FatGav ♦2 | Thanks for that. I couldn't work out how to remove a "relationship" to be able to delete a path that wasn't there.Any advice?Cheers | |
| 3 | 2024-09-04 08:57 | BCNorwich | Hi, The relation should be edited, but this is not very easy to do with the iD editor. It is very easy to break a relation without realising. Can you point out which section of the path you mean and I'l try to help using the JOSM editor? | |
| 4 | 2024-09-05 05:48 | FatGav ♦2 | Yes, I mean remove that path from the relationship. So it is editing that relationship. You must have done this to change what I did, so thankyou. Its the 1st time id seen this message. Next time I will research it more to see how I do this.Thanks again | |
| 156096974 by Hinksj97 @ 2024-09-02 12:40 | 1 | 2024-09-04 06:43 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Is the building still an ambulance station?Regards Bernard. |
| 156105312 by ThGl @ 2024-09-02 15:50 | 1 | 2024-09-04 06:33 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.It's better to amend/correct existing mapped features rather than deleting and re-drawing then the complete history is kept on the feature. I've reverted your changes and corrected the existing building outlines. Thus, the information you deleted with the ... |
| 156071080 by Buster1100 @ 2024-09-01 20:18 | 1 | 2024-09-03 07:17 | BCNorwich | Hello, I don't think this building now exists, I think there are several new buildings on the site. Would you agree? If so this building should be removed.Regards Bernard. |
| 156070970 by Buster1100 @ 2024-09-01 20:14 | 1 | 2024-09-03 06:50 | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Sorry to have to say there is a problem here. As warned above your new building outline Way: BDT Transport (1312675201) is placed on top of an existing building, duplication. It's OSM practice that if a mapped feature needs amending or correcting the correct... |
| 156016912 by RitasDeva @ 2024-08-31 14:08 | 1 | 2024-09-01 06:18 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your informal path Way: 1312436748 was placed almost entirely on top of existing highways, this would seriously disrupt routing. Thus I've removed the path.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-09-01 06:23 | BCNorwich | Hi, The above applies to Way: 1312436749 as well which I've removed. Does the bridge Way: 1312436750 actually exist Or should this also be removed?Regards Bernard. | |
| 155871317 by TB10PERCENT @ 2024-08-28 09:57 | 1 | 2024-08-30 06:52 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You've unfortunately made many mistakes here. Way: 1311731991, Way: 1311731989, Way: 1311731985, Way: 1311731980, Way: 1311786965, Way: 1311731993, Way: 1311731995 had in part been placed on top of existing highways which disrupts routing. I've made many corr... |
| 155816387 by burdwanu98 @ 2024-08-27 07:52 | 1 | 2024-08-29 07:12 | BCNorwich | Removed footpath as it duplicates another highway. Removed steps tag |
| 155844980 by The Local Surveyor @ 2024-08-27 17:51 | 1 | 2024-08-28 05:51 | BCNorwich | Hi, self intersections removed, buildings joined at party walls, all squared up. |
| 2 | 2024-08-28 07:18 | The Local Surveyor ♦5 | Hi, thank you for your help regarding that. Just still trying to work out Josm but thanks once again. | |
| 155777109 by PWDW @ 2024-08-26 11:20 | 1 | 2024-08-26 13:29 | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.There is some access to these paths so it's incorrect to just say access=no. There is access on foot and being agricultural land there would be agricultural access. You would need to define the type of access that is not allowed before saying access=no. I... |
| 155538775 by xanjvstha @ 2024-08-21 06:01 | 1 | 2024-08-24 07:42 | BCNorwich | Hello,There are many warnings given above, several of these warnings could be mapping that could cause disruption to routing. Could you please look at and try to fix some of the problems? Regards Bernard. |
| 155389273 by WillFR130 @ 2024-08-17 20:46 | 1 | 2024-08-18 07:18 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've removed the bridge tag from the footpaths, also added layer tags to the bridges. |
| 2 | 2024-08-18 07:28 | WillFR130 ♦7 | Thank you for your corrections. Please do not edit the "landcover=trees" tags which I have used in this area. I will remove these tags myself when I have finished mapping the tree cover task on my farm. Thank you | |
| 3 | 2024-08-18 10:48 | BCNorwich | Hi, It looks like your landcover tag is being used wrongly, the areas you've mapped are actually individual trees or tree lines as you've previously accepted. As such OSM practice says they should be nodes or linear features not area features. Whatever you add to OSM should be correct grou... | |
| 4 | 2024-08-18 10:58 | WillFR130 ♦7 | I appreciate your feedback however I'm struggling to get Josm to work on my laptop at the moment and must use ID. The task will only last a few more days. Then I will delete all the tags which I have created wrongly and use the correct nodes and tags. So please refrain from changing the "l... | |
| 155285226 by WillFR130 @ 2024-08-15 14:15 | 1 | 2024-08-18 07:07 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've made amendments to rectify the warnings given above which relate to highways. |
| 155237669 by atomicryan @ 2024-08-14 12:21 | 1 | 2024-08-15 06:38 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've just removed 5 sections of duplicated highways. Please take care not to make duplicated highways as it could cause problems with routing. Making very large changesets, (about 250 features edited/added here), makes it very difficult for you or anyone else to spot mistakes. 10 features i... |
| 155236325 by blankerne @ 2024-08-14 11:51 Active block | 1 | 2024-08-14 15:10 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Your changeset comment here is "fantasy".Can you explain what you mean by that? |
| 2 | 2024-08-15 05:13 | BCNorwich | Hello SomeoneElse,I think this new users changesets look very similar to user Grayson Braham-Dopwell who has just been blocked.I'll leave it for you to revert if you think the same.Regards Bernard. | |
| 3 | 2024-08-15 09:43 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155274758 where the changeset comment is: Reverting alleged fantasy mapping. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16584 | |
| 155149223 by Grayson Braham-Dopwell @ 2024-08-12 13:26 Active block | 1 | 2024-08-12 14:32 | BCNorwich | Hi, Your fantasy mapping has been removed. OSM is a live worldwide database to which fantasy mapping is not welcome. There are other places to construct fantasy maps a Google search will assist you.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-08-14 12:14 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155237332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting alleged fantasy mapping. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16579 | |
| 155005631 by Thishara @ 2024-08-09 05:42 | 1 | 2024-08-12 06:31 | BCNorwich | Hello,It seems from the warnings above and the few problems I've just corrected that the are imperfections in your mapping. The warnings above state 31 crossing highways and 23 disconnected highways. I've removed several duplicated sections of highway. These problems ought to be resolved... |
| 154704730 by JonnyW03 @ 2024-08-01 17:39 | 1 | 2024-08-02 06:04 | BCNorwich | Hi, Regarding the steps Way: 1305097823. They need to be sectioned up and an appropiate layer tag added to show which step section is above the other. As mapped now all the steps are implied (in the absence of a layer tag) to be at layer=0, ground level.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-08-10 19:07 | BCNorwich | No response so I've corrected as best I can. | |
| 3 | 2024-08-11 11:43 | JonnyW03 ♦1 | Many thanks. Apologies as I’ve been away but thank you very much for fixing it. | |
| 154953756 by Richard Carden @ 2024-08-07 20:58 | 1 | 2024-08-09 07:31 | BCNorwich | Hi, I've unjoined the grass areas from highway center lines. |
| 155001028 by Al-Firdous Publications @ 2024-08-09 00:12 | 1 | 2024-08-09 06:07 | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your website says this is a facility for online book purchase, not a shop open to the public. Thus it is better described/tagged as office=online_shop. I've made the amendment.I've also removed the tag shop=books from the building as this is not corr... |
| 154869879 by WillFR130 @ 2024-08-05 21:55 | 1 | 2024-08-07 06:50 | BCNorwich | Hi, Regarding the Way: 1305827977 tagged landcover=trees and natural=tree_row. The landcover isn't rendered so is of no value. The tag natural=tree_row, this tag should refer to a linear feature not an area. This is why the area is rendered as a tree row enclosing an area. The two tags don'... |
| 154871584 by WillFR130 @ 2024-08-05 23:40 | 1 | 2024-08-07 06:39 | BCNorwich | Hello there, As you can see here:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154871584#map=18/52.32865/-3.87478&layers=N the tag landcover=? isn't rendered, so no one looking at the OSM map will see it. But the tags natural=wood, natural=forest, natural=tree_row are rendered. The landcover t... |
| 2 | 2024-08-08 22:02 | WillFR130 ♦7 | Thank you for your response to my changesets. I did not realize that Landcover could not be used as a tag for tree cover. the option was there in the drop down box so i used it. As for Way: 1305836370 i can confirm that the contents tagged are in fact trees and not a hedge. Aerial imagery makes it l... | |
| 154847716 by MaxDH97 @ 2024-08-05 12:07 | 1 | 2024-08-05 12:12 | BCNorwich | Hi, It the gardens are for the dwellings and not open to the public, they ought to be tagged access=private.Regards |
| 2 | 2024-08-05 13:03 | rskedgell ♦1,481 | Also garden:type=residentialhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:garden:type%3Dresidential | |
| 154691177 by Maya L Lee @ 2024-08-01 12:13 | 1 | 2024-08-05 08:03 | BCNorwich | Duplicated highway removed, public footpath aligned and tagged. |
| 2 | 2024-08-05 08:06 | BCNorwich | A second duplicated section removed. | |
| 154817386 by CraigPe @ 2024-08-04 15:22 | 1 | 2024-08-05 07:54 | BCNorwich | Hi, There seems to be quite a few problems here with the interconnectivity of differing levels among other things. Please see here:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=0.28474&lat=50.76930&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cse... |
| 2 | 2024-08-05 21:24 | CraigPe ♦2 | Hi Bernard, thank you for pointing out those issues. I will work to correct those. | |
| 150236580 by Норич Мастър 2024 @ 2024-04-19 18:23 | 1 | 2024-04-20 05:58 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Are the new features you've mapped and the deletions made actually verifiable on the ground or are they proposed alterations to the airport?Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-08-04 00:20 | spencerledger ♦4 | Is somebody able to reverse this changeset? It is an incorrect edit. | |
| 3 | 2024-08-04 05:20 | BCNorwich | Hi spencerledger, There was no response from the mapper. With your say that this is incorrect, I've reverted the changeset.Regards Bernard. | |
| 154730624 by Shieldzy13 @ 2024-08-02 11:00 | 1 | 2024-08-02 12:49 | BCNorwich | Hi, Review of this changeset, firstly there are many warnings of problems as can be seen above. Some warnings are critical and need to be corrected, others are things that the mapper should look at and correct/amend to suit OSM practice.Secondly it is an extremely large changeset, 171 features a... |
| 2 | 2024-08-02 13:01 | Shieldzy13 ♦2 | Bernard,Thanks for getting back so fast.Regarding the warnings that's strange as I went through all the warnings and thought they were corrected other than one regarding the school. Also I think it split my change into two reviews as there were actually 249. I apologise for this being so ... | |
| 154709257 by Shieldzy13 @ 2024-08-01 19:52 | 1 | 2024-08-02 05:04 | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for trying but you didn't change it you deleted it. No problem though, I've reinstated the area and tagged it landuse=residential.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-08-02 09:05 | Shieldzy13 ♦2 | Sorry about that it was my first attempt and it wasn't working very well on my tablet. Today I am making some changes to this area on my pc. Will it be you who reviews them or is it random? | |
| 3 | 2024-08-02 10:45 | BCNorwich | Hi, Reviews if done are usually by folk who happen on the edits or by folk like me who look at edits from new contributors in an area they are interested. I can look at your edits and comment if needed.Regards Bernard | |
| 4 | 2024-08-02 11:05 | Shieldzy13 ♦2 | Brill good to know. IV just don't a big load of changes in this area. Hopefully they are ok. Let me know if IV made any mistakes. Please don't delete all my changes. | |
| 154653536 by Znassir @ 2024-07-31 14:44 | 1 | 2024-08-01 18:08 | BCNorwich | Duplicated sections of highways removed. |
| 154689968 by The Farmers Wife @ 2024-08-01 11:42 | 1 | 2024-08-01 17:20 | BCNorwich | Duplicated paths removed. |
| 154689627 by The Farmers Wife @ 2024-08-01 11:35 | 1 | 2024-08-01 17:18 | BCNorwich | Duplicate paths removed. |
| 154689520 by The Farmers Wife @ 2024-08-01 11:32 | 1 | 2024-08-01 17:17 | BCNorwich | Duplicated paths removed. |
| 154689467 by The Farmers Wife @ 2024-08-01 11:31 | 1 | 2024-08-01 17:16 | BCNorwich | Hi, You somehow added duplicated footpaths. I've removed the duplications and tweaked the path line to the definitive line as shown on the Highway Authority website. I added the appropriate tags for a PRoW. The crossfield section of path is removed. |
| 154688891 by The Farmers Wife @ 2024-08-01 11:16 | 1 | 2024-08-01 16:09 | BCNorwich | The section joining to the roundabout is part of a cycleway route. |
| 154688693 by The Farmers Wife @ 2024-08-01 11:11 | 1 | 2024-08-01 15:25 | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM had the highway tagged as a track, third party apps are to blame for your problems. OSM has not implied that the track is a "public footpath/bridleway/permissive path". Your grievance ought to be taken up with apps that lay false claims about access ... |
| 2 | 2024-08-01 15:29 | BCNorwich | I forgot to say OSM only uses formal verifiable names, thus I've removed the name. | |
| 154611681 by Maya L Lee @ 2024-07-30 15:31 | 1 | 2024-08-01 07:42 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've removed several duplicated sections of highway which would have disrupted routing.If a service road is also a public footpath please do not map the path on top of the road. Rather amend the tagging to the road to show it's dual use, designation=pub... |
| 2 | 2024-08-01 07:49 | BCNorwich | Hi, A different problem, footpath Way: 1304673213, you've mapped as crossing 2 waterways, the waterways are restrictions to the highway. Are there bridges or fords crossing the waterways? Regards Bernard. | |
| 154656929 by NT Formby paths @ 2024-07-31 15:52 | 1 | 2024-08-01 07:21 | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Your contribution to OSM is much appreciated, but, it contains many problems. There are 16 highway warnings given above which should be corrected. If you could restrict the number of edits in any uploaded changeset to about 10 then it would be much easier f... |
| 2 | 2024-08-01 08:28 | NT Formby paths ♦1 | Hi Bernard,Thank you for that, I'll correct anything I incorrectly changed today. Due to coastal change some paths have disappeared/overgrown etc but my mistake with the English Coastal Path, I was trying to avoid changing that one, just the others around it.Cheers | |
| 154658721 by Smifff @ 2024-07-31 16:30 | 1 | 2024-07-31 18:41 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.If the road is open then the access=no tag should also be removed from all sections. It looks open to me but I'm not local so I can't verify that.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-07-31 22:14 | Smifff ♦1 | I am unfamiliar with the process and the software, so not sure what you are talking about. If something is not right then please amend my fix I have done.I live next to this road and am unable to use apps that use OpenStreetMap due to this change, hence me trying to fix it. The road was closed for... | |
| 3 | 2024-08-01 06:10 | BCNorwich | Hello Smifff, Just to let you know I've removed all restriction tags so the road should soon be routable in OSM. I've also tagged the priority over the narrow bridge.Regards Bernard. | |
| 154662741 by Grayson BD @ 2024-07-31 18:11 Active block | 1 | 2024-07-31 18:32 | BCNorwich | Fiction reverted. |
| 2 | 2024-08-01 07:47 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154680287 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16522 | |
| 154655999 by Grayson BD @ 2024-07-31 15:35 Active block | 1 | 2024-07-31 15:43 | BCNorwich | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.OSM is a live worldwide database, fiction is not welcome here. Please stop adding fiction and revert the fiction you've already added.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-07-31 17:43 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154661668 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some alleged fantasy mapping. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16521 | |
| 154544805 by sovereign_khoipm @ 2024-07-29 04:44 Active block | 1 | 2024-07-30 06:17 | BCNorwich | Hi, You made several duplicate highways which would disrupt routing. I've removed the duplicates.If you limit your changeset to 10 to 20 features instead of nearly 500 you might see the problems you make.Regards Bernard |
| 2 | 2024-08-01 02:03 | thangqd ♦2 | Thank you for your comments and supports, Bernard. We will upload changesets in moderate amounts and carefully check topology errors before uploading to OSM | |
| 154482083 by andy_b @ 2024-07-27 13:07 | 1 | 2024-07-27 14:09 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution.I've unjoined the path line from the landuse (field) outline, as per OSM practice. One question is the footpath formally named or signed and verifiable as per:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability ? Or is 'Numb... |
| 2 | 2024-07-27 17:11 | andy_b ♦1 | Thanks for the welcome, and for the fixes too. I've swapped the name and description as suggested. The road that forks off from Egg Farm Lane to Numbers farm and on to Sheppey's Lane is gated. So over the last couple of years or so it seems the preferred route is the permissive one aro... | |
| 143751129 by BCNorwich @ 2023-11-07 19:33 | 1 | 2024-07-25 17:04 | bagis ♦19 | Hello!This change is wrong. There is still construction at this site, which is now visible on Esri. What problem where you trying to solve with this change?Best regards,Bagis |
| 2 | 2024-07-25 17:51 | BCNorwich | Hi Bagis, It was 9 months ago I changed a section of Jonstorpsvägen from highway=construction to highway=residential. I also removed the construction area tagged construction=grasslanduse=construction from within an area tagged landuse=grass.I can see no ongoing construction work ... | |
| 3 | 2024-07-25 20:02 | bagis ♦19 | In JOSM or iD I select "Esri World Imagery". Between Jonstorpsvägen and Huvudstaleden the big parkinglot, the grass and bushes are gone all the way to Alphyddevägen. I hope you can see it. I surveyd the area today and these images seems accurate to what is there now. My goal is u... | |
| 4 | 2024-07-26 06:12 | BCNorwich | Hi, My apologies, it was 9 months ago, I don't know if that Esri image was then available. But you are correct.I've now added back the construction area as best I can and amended the other areas and service roads. Do you know what the type of construction is?The addition is made in... | |
| 5 | 2024-07-27 08:51 | bagis ♦19 | Hello!No worries, we are both trying to make the map better and we had no problem solving this.I made some/a lot of changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154472721 I think this correct enough with the current reality.Apparently they are building several new residential buildin... | |
| 153999967 by kgc1994 @ 2024-07-16 06:55 | 1 | 2024-07-16 08:57 | BCNorwich | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Reviewing your mapping as requested I can see a few inadvertent mistakes. The garages are crossing over each other, (warning given above). I think there would only be two garages, one for each house.The two houses north of the garages look to be semi-detached... |
| 2 | 2024-07-25 07:55 | BCNorwich | No response so I've tweaked a few things as mentioned above. | |
| 154210039 by Znassir @ 2024-07-21 09:23 | 1 | 2024-07-25 06:43 | BCNorwich | Hi, Please be aware of the many warnings given above. I've just remove some duplicated highway that you mapped. |