Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-06-28 11:44:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, it has many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4930534149

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-28 07:38:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "dbh" on these nodes. It is not used anywhere else up to now - what is meaning of this key?
12017-06-28 07:37:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
all of these ways have many tags which don't seem to belong to the OSM database, e.g.:

date=no
full_id=w667896
ispaved=True
osm_id=667896
osm_type=way
telenav_cy=CHANGED
22017-06-28 12:22:34 UTCioanam_telenav Hello!
Sorry, it was my mistake. I have changed and uploaded the tags according to the OSM database.
32017-06-28 13:19:54 UTCioanam_telenav I have worked on a specific data set and I have accidentally uploaded it. But I have deleted everything that has mistakenly been uploaded. Now it should be fine.
12017-06-27 13:17:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. You added a lot of points here, but none of them has any meaningful tags. Please take your time to read in the OSM Wiki how tagging has to be done to be useful in any application that uses OSM data.
12017-06-27 11:32:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Tag "lanes2" schauen? Scheint mir eher eine destination in irgendeine Richtung zu sein. Und 'maxspeed:source' sollte eher 'source:maxspeed' heißen.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353516976
Gruß, Jan
12017-06-26 10:34:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
ich habe hier an einigen Knoten Tippfehler korrigiert (sowas wie 'newtork' oder 'public_tranport'). Ich weiß nicht, ob ich alle erwischt habe, vielleicht kannst du auch nochmal drüberschauen. Gruß, Jan
22017-06-26 10:43:39 UTCHairyCoo Danke für deine Aufmerksamkeit! Ich werde noch mal überprüfen! MfG HairyCoo
12017-06-25 17:15:13 UTCmueschel Woher stammt die Information, dass das hier die K246 ist? Schilder habe ich da bis jetzt noch keine sehen können.
22017-06-25 18:56:46 UTCfurban das habe ich wohl hier gelesen https://www.karben.de/rathaus-buergerservice/projekte/nordumgehung/
32017-06-25 19:05:44 UTCTourenbikerFKB http://www.deges.de/Startseite/L-3351-Ortsumgehung-Karben-eroeffnet-E1440.htm

Hier wird sie als L3351. Die frühere L3351 durch den Ortskern wurde zurückgestuft.

Am besten mal bei Hessen Mobil erkundigen.
42017-06-25 19:06:28 UTCTourenbikerFKB ...soll heißen: mit L3351 bezeichnet.
52017-06-25 20:27:01 UTCmueschel Genau, sie soll die L3351 werden. Habe aber keine Beschilderung gesehen, dass das schon passiert ist.
62017-06-26 06:03:28 UTCfurban Dann bau es doch um. Kann man ja immer noch wieder anders machen. Aber es klingt ja nur logisch das diese Straße eher mal ein Lxxx als ein Kxxx sein sollte.
12017-06-25 18:11:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "lcr_ref" to several roads - did you mean "lcn_ref"?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-25 18:16:55 UTCSebastianPlesko yes. i'm going to soon remove it anyway and make "relations" instead. i finally got a map from the local municipality (was really hard to find) where exactly the bicycle paths go.
12017-06-24 20:25:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "ScientificName" on some nodes - in OSM we have the tag "species" (as well as "genus") for that. If you want to tag the English name of the species, you can use "species:en".

Jan
12017-06-24 20:15:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
Kannst du hier nochmal nach dem payment-Tag schauen? Mit eckigen Klammern kann man da wohl nicht bezahlen :-)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4917650794
22017-06-24 20:18:52 UTCtbm Fixed, thanks!
12017-06-24 20:10:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way just got one strange tag and is missing an "highway" Tag. Could you have a look?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500714135

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-24 18:22:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - too many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502976662
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-23 18:44:45 UTCmueschel Die Linie 74 hält in Vilbel weder am Bussteig A noch B, sondern ausschließlich an E. Sie war allerdings absichtlich nicht eingetragen, weil es sich dabei nur um 2 Schülerfahrten pro Schultag handelt, und wir solche Schulbusse oft gar nicht erfassen.
22017-06-24 19:27:36 UTCTetiSoft Danke für die Info, habe Linie 74 (die vorher übrigens schon eingetragen war aber IIRC ab Heinrich-Heine-Straße statt Bahnhof fuhr) korrigiert. Habe auch ref und local_ref für die Haltepositionen am Bahnhof gesetzt.
12017-06-23 13:03:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
das Tag hier sieht merkwürdig aus...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2313608108

Gruß, Jan
12017-06-23 12:50:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check the tagging. Email, Phone and Website are no valid keys in OSM.
Also, please don't misuse the description tag for extended advertising texts.
22017-06-28 09:40:20 UTCHilton Hotels Thank you for turning our attention to the wrongly entered tags. All of this has been fixed. Thank you once again.
12017-06-23 12:42:22 UTCmueschel Could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39437968
'maxspeed:f' is not a valid tag.
22017-06-26 06:13:16 UTCalinan_telenav Hello,
Thank you for pointing this out for me. I changed the tag.
Have a nice day,
Alina
12017-06-23 12:41:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
could you explain the meaning of the tags you added here? I don't fully see what you want to express and in the current state it also can not be interpreted by software.
You could have a look to the wiki to see how bus stops are currently mapped.
12017-06-23 12:14:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
the 198 objects you added here contain some rather strange tags:
CODE=WALL
COLOUR_NU=16
GROUP=BuildingL
LENGTH=22.406
NUMBER=1025
TYPE=Line
Where these added by mistake or is there some useful information contained?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-22 08:54:02 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du gibst hier als Quelle ein Buch an - hast du eine schriftliche Genehmigung, diese Daten in OSM zu übernehmen? Die Lizenz unter der Quellen stehen, muss mit der ODbL von OSM kompatibel sein.
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-22 14:37:54 UTCosm_Ralef Hallo Jan,
ich war etwas blauäugig, diese Infos so einzustellen. Bin nicht davon ausgegangen, das die hier schon urherberrechtlich interessant ist, da nur kurze Auszüge mit Quellenangabe. Eine Genehmigung wird auch schwierig, da der Verfasser leider 2001 verstorben ist.

Ich werde alle ...
12017-06-21 20:42:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "litname = no". Did you mean "lit=no"?
www.openstreetmap.org/way/483249177
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-22 14:27:31 UTCLowe253 Hi, mueschel

you guessed right. Already fixed.

Thanks
12017-06-21 20:23:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
between 6th and 7th street you created 3 overlapping roads. Could you check and fix that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-21 19:39:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of this tag?
ata_delete:construction \t2017-06-30
on node http://osm.org/node/2499396427

If there is some temporary construction, it's best to use the "temporary" prefix or "conditional" suffix, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_fea...
12017-06-21 12:36:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
dieser Tag hier stimmt leider auch nicht so ganz:
"access:agricultural:forward:conditional =\tnone @ maxweight"
Keine Gewichtsbeschränkung für landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge wäre

maxweight:forward:conditional = none @ agricultural

Grüße, Jan
22017-06-21 18:30:23 UTCProtoxenus habs geändert......
12017-06-20 21:22:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tags "moped_p" and "moped_a" in this changeset. These are not used very often - moped_P and moped_A are used more often. Could you adapt to this more common spelling of the keys?
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-21 11:53:04 UTCM!dgard Hi Jan

Tags with capital letters don't fit in with the other tags. For example for emergency=aed it was voted explicitly to use lowercase.

I'm aware that moped_A is more popular at the moment, but unless it is standardized to use uppercase (there're only two mentions about it in the wiki, no d...
32017-06-21 12:27:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're right, upper case keys are rare. But looking at the statistics, we have e.g. 550 moped_A, but only 30 moped_a. In my opinion, the best way is to first adopt the more common scheme and in parallel start a discussion in the local community. Then we can do an automated retagging once there ...
42017-06-21 12:39:33 UTCM!dgard (Erratum: it was voted as emergency=defibrillator, not aed, but the vote for the lowercase option got significantly more votes than the uppercase one.)
52017-06-21 12:59:28 UTCM!dgard > the best way is to first adopt the more common scheme and in parallel start a discussion in the local community

The problem is that the discussion will cite usage numbers, they are one of the metrics that are used to do an informal vote. I don't support that though, those are too easily infl...
62017-06-21 13:08:28 UTCM!dgard Matching some more different combinations with the mopeds:

Uppercase: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pVA 706 ways
Lowercase: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pVB 379 ways

So the difference is definitely not an order of magnitude.
12017-06-20 21:30:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
du nutzt hier die Tags
maxweight:lanes:left=12t
mindistance:hgv:lanes:right=50m
Das Suffix :left bzw. :right ist in diesem Zusammenhang nicht definiert - was möchtest du ausdrücken?
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-21 07:27:24 UTCProtoxenus Die Brücke ist so um die 50 Jahre alt und nicht für das andauernde Befahren mit 40t-LKW konstruiert. Deshalb gibt es eine Einschränkung: linker Fahrstreifen Fahrzeuge mit maximal 12t, rechter Fahrstreifen mit minimalem Abstand von 50m für LKW. Das habe ich versucht, umzusetzen.
32017-06-21 07:32:21 UTCmueschel Alles klar, das würde dann so aussehen:
maxweight:lanes = 12t |
mindistance:hgv:lanes = | 50
Bei ":lanes" werden einfach die Eigenschaften aller Spuren aufgezählt, von links nach rechts, getrennt mit "|", Spuren ohne Eigenschaften bleiben leer.
42017-06-21 07:35:38 UTCProtoxenus Ok, daran hatte ich nicht gedacht. Danke für den Hinweis.
12017-06-11 09:18:30 UTCwhb Was bedeutet denn "2017 = 4 km/h"?
z.B. hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118342708
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60175718
22017-06-13 16:07:51 UTCdornweg Was "2017 = 4 km/h" bedeutet würde mich auch interessieren. Der Eintrag war schon vorhanden, und ich wollte ihn nicht einfach löschen.
32017-06-20 19:59:36 UTCmueschel Da muss ich dich leider enttäuschen, den Tag gibt es erst seit diesem Changeset. Ich lösche ihn dann mal.
12017-06-20 11:10:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found a speling mistake on 43 ways: area:higway instead of area:highway - could you have a look and fix it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-20 19:50:29 UTCCiemek Hi
I corrected spelling mistakes
12017-06-20 11:08:19 UTCmueschel Please stop adding new objects and sort out your spelling mistakes. Most of the data you added is completely useless because of spelling mistakes. It's likely we have to fully delete it because it would take days to clean everything up by hand.
12017-06-19 10:56:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many objects with foreign tags which don't look like they should appear in OSM data, e.g.
ALAND=0
AWATER=433
HYDROID=110783668525
INTPTLAT=+35.5385696
INTPTLON=-93.4273783
MTFCC=H2030

Could you have a look and clean this up?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-19 10:48:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw you added the tag "width:parking:lane:both" on several ways. This tag is not used in any other place up to now. In other places, the tag is "parking:lane:both:width". Could you change this to the common tag?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-21 04:13:55 UTCtheangrytomato Whoops, sorry about that. Should have it fixed tonight!
Bradley
12017-06-19 10:20:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check all your tagging of nodes for correctness. Spelling is very important! Most of these tags with spelling mistakes were added by you and can not be used at all in OSM:

add: city\t
add:city\t
add:place\t
add:street\t
addr : city\t
addr : street\t
Addr:\t
Addr: city\t...
12017-06-17 08:13:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
du hast hier Tags wie 'roadbike-smoothness', 'roadbike:soothness' und 'roadbike:smoothness' hinzugefügt, jeweils etwa 80 Mal.
Diese Tags gibt es bisher nicht, und sie entsprechen auch nicht den üblichen Taggingregeln.
a) 2 davon haben Schreibfehler, das letzte ist das korrekteste.
...
22017-06-17 08:46:06 UTCmatchman Hallo Jan,
ähnlich dem mtb:scale tag geht es mir darum die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit aus der Sicht eines Rennradfahrers darzustellen und diese zu klassifizieren. Der smoothness key ist hierfür leider nicht präzise genug.
Ich würde den key in smoothness:roadbike ändern...
32017-06-19 08:51:30 UTCmueschel Ok. Eine Dokumentation in Form eines Proposals sollte es dann schon geben. Am besten natürlich gleich mit Blick auf alle möglichen Verkehrsteilnehmer, nicht nur auf Radfahrer bezogen.
12017-06-17 18:07:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of tags. Only correctly spelled tags can be used by OSM software.
E.g. I found 40 objects with the tag 'operater', which should read 'operator'.
I didn't check all your edits, but I also found a "amenity=post office" which should be "amenity=po...
12017-06-17 18:03:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found you added several objects with strange tags, like these:
open space =yes
play ground =godwari-14,makhu boou
This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look to the wiki about common
tags for shops or am...
12017-06-16 18:05:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcomr to OSM! Please watch out for the spelling of tags, it's "building", "addr:city" and 'colour'. I corrected some of these,but maybe I missed a few.
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-16 17:57:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging? Looks like name and ele tags somehow got mixed.

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-16 18:15:56 UTCdaniel-ibex Hi - the log cabin shelter is out-of-path - node 4904544425, v2 is independently - cordially

sorry , I do not speak English
12017-06-15 13:39:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4904979640

Looks like something went wrong with the name tag.
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-15 15:25:52 UTCTe-Ika Oh yep, got it fixed, thanks!
12017-06-15 13:37:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "wayID" to several roads. This key is not used anywhere else - what is the meaning? Is it an official number? This is tagged as 'ref' usually.

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-15 13:36:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this tagging: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46615603

The tag "M = 4" looks like a mistake.
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-15 13:29:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw you added some destination tags lately. I would like to point out the usual order of suffixes, e.g.
destination:colour:lanes:backward
(not destination:lanes:colour:backward)

In general, the scheme is:
key[:subkey][:hgv|:bicycle|...][:lanes][:forward|:backward|:both_ways] = *


...
12017-06-14 11:46:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
'socket:schuko:output' wird bis jetzt nicht verwendet, 'socket:schuko:current' ist (auch für andere Stecker) wesentlich verbreiteter.
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-14 13:49:13 UTCschnism Hi,

ich war mir da auch nicht sicher, und habe mich darum am Wiki orientiert:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Auch taginfo sagt leider garnichts dazu:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=charging_station#combinations

Beides mappen ist auch ...
32017-06-14 14:24:38 UTCmueschel Ja, die "Kombinationen" sind da nicht umfassend genug für seltene Tags. Ich habe hier geschaut:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/socket:type2#similar

Unter der Stecker-Tabelle im Wiki taucht "socket:type2:output" tatsächlich auf, wird aber im Gegensatz zu curr...
12017-06-14 12:51:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the spelling of the key "Source:maxspeed" on 90 ways? It should be lower case, 'source:maxspeed'.

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-14 11:59:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the 'capacity:' tag here? Something's missing.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498675775
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-14 11:55:32 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498610347
I guess those tags shouldn't be there, or the way should be closed or part of a relation. And I don't see the meaning of the 'fff' key.

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-14 13:54:52 UTCMichaelCollinson Thanks Jan for finding this. Incomplete edit. I have completed it now.
12017-06-14 11:48:15 UTCmueschel Kann man das wieder löschen?
22017-06-18 08:48:59 UTCRisou Ja
12017-06-14 11:36:38 UTCmueschel This changeset contains another set of 380 misspelled address tags, addr_house,
addr_stree.

Please fix this before uploading!
22017-06-14 14:38:23 UTCAndrew Matheny Corrected in changeset 49531966. Thanks!
12017-06-14 11:31:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
ich habe zwei Tipps zum Erfassen von Wegweisern:
a) wenn du Keys wie 'direction_west_1' benutzt, schreibe 'direction_west:1', das ist die übliche Form zum Nummerieren.
b) Ich empfehle Relationen um solche Schilder zu erfassen, das ist wesentlich genauer und einfacher auszuwerten, siehe: ...
12017-06-13 10:52:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this container?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4896938441

"domestic_oil" is not used as a key up to now. Maybe "recycling:cooking_oil = yes"?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-13 10:49:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Namen schauen? Da stimmt das Tagging nicht.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29468157

Gruss, Jan
12017-06-13 10:48:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this place node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4898346197

"Lera = asphalt" looks like a mistake.
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-13 10:59:15 UTCzvenzzon Thanks a lot, it's now corrected.
12017-06-13 10:38:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag you put on this node looks a bit strange:
xmas \t= Traffic calming bump
Did you mean "traffic_calming = bump"?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-13 12:50:31 UTCszydzio Hi! Yes indeed, I meant traffic_calming = bump. I was just an old node imported by OsmAnd which for some unknown reason adds this strange tag. I cleaned it up - thanks for the hint!
12017-06-13 10:35:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier nochmal über die Adressen schauen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497998566
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497998573
Tags wie dieses sehen nach einem Fehler aus:
89a = Am Winkel

Gruß, Jan
12017-06-13 10:25:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier gibt es 97 Bäume mit dem Tag "de:genus". Das sollte richtig "genus:de" heißen. Schaust du da bitte nochmal drüber?

Gruß, Jan
22017-06-13 12:05:23 UTCkartonage Uff, richtig blöder Dreher. Habe es korrigiert, danke!
12017-06-13 10:23:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your edits in this area I saw about 80 cases of a spelling mistake "destionation" instead of "destination". Could you please check this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-12 10:54:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this barrier and the one close by?
http://osm.org/node/4895536995
The tag "hoy =30" looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-12 12:31:35 UTCAllroads Yes, changed it. i can not clarify, why this tag. I believe, I merged it. And was already there.
12017-06-12 10:40:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "source=google" here. Please not that information from google is not allowed to be added in OSM due to the terms of usage / licenses. Please remove the information you got from Google, otherwise we might have to delete the whole object.
Jan
12017-06-11 10:34:31 UTCmueschel Moin,
kannst du bitte hier nochmal über die Adressen schauen? Das Tag "addr:coutry=DE" sollte eigentlich "addr:country=DE" sein - ist aber eigentlich auch unnötig, weil Grenzen bei uns sehr gut erfasst sind.

Gruß, Jan
22017-06-12 10:47:37 UTCJanisJf Ja war ein doofer fortgeführter copy & paste Rechtschreibfehler :O Hab es schon gefixt.
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49464049)
12017-06-11 10:30:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 3 nodes with strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4895835026
Looks like something went wrong with importing your GPS data. Could you have a look?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-11 10:36:47 UTCAndersAndersson Hello,
Thanks for pointing that out. I add a lot of nodes from my GPS surveys. Sometimes I forget to remove the extra data that my Garmin GPS device adds. I have fixed that node now, and will do a search for similar data with overpass-turbo.eu.
12017-06-11 10:22:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "alt_ name" to 31 streets. Could you fix the spelling of the key, there should be no space, like "alt_name".

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-07 20:15:57 UTCtrigpoint Hi, this gate looks a little wrong as it has 3 ways connecting to it. It needs to be separate from the junction otherwise it is impossible to tell which routes pass through the gate,
Cheers Phil
22017-06-07 20:17:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
that's not my work, it was added by http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49075370

Cheers, Jan
32017-06-07 20:46:10 UTCtrigpoint Hi Jan
Sorry, I will see if I can work it out.

Cheers Phil
12017-06-07 11:52:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several objects with strange tags like 54 =77
601 =77
Could you check that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-07 11:38:50 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM. Bitte schau mal ins Wiki, wie Addressen und POIs bezeichnet werden müssen. All diese Informationen sind z.Z. nicht auswertbar, weil sie nicht dem normalen Schema entsprechen.

adress \tEinener Dorfbauerschaft 30
ort \tWarendorf
plz \t48231
telefon \t4925841666\...
12017-06-07 11:28:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
das Tag "capacity:undisabled" gibt es bis jetzt nirgends sonst. Warum nicht das normale "capacity:disabled"?

Gruss, Jan
12017-06-06 11:15:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
is "Koma-koma" the name of this river?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331458995

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-31 13:10:21 UTCholgerd the field paper: http://fieldpapers.org/snapshots/3dsblppm#17/52.49256790905722/13.42859263080393
22017-06-06 11:00:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du diesen Node nochmal überprüfen bzgl Toiletten?

Gruß, Jan

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/700732539

toilets:wheelchair \tno
toilets:wheelchair_1 \tyes
12017-06-06 10:56:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
this is another set of nodes with no valid tag, but a lot of foreign stuff. Please clean up your data before importing it to OSM!

Jan
12017-06-06 10:38:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this roundabout? It has several strange tags.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496820690

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-08 00:10:19 UTCSunfishtommy I took away the tags I don't know where they came from.
12017-06-05 20:39:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "dsscreated=#brunch" on several POIs, could you explain it?

Btw, please have a look to the Wiki about tagging of opening_hours - there is a well defined syntax to make it machine-readable.

Jan
12017-06-05 20:34:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put these tags on some ways:

maxweight = 3.5
maxweight:condition = yes @ service
The conditional tag doesn't seem to be right (yes is not a valid value for maxweight and @ service is not defined)

Can you explain what you want to tag here?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-05 20:37:43 UTCYod4z the way is limited to 3.5 t but if the hgv is for service (trash, road construction...) it can go even if it has more than 3.5t.
12017-06-05 20:32:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
schaust du hier mal nach dem Versuch des Öffnungszeiten-Taggings? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496768509
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-05 20:47:43 UTCbielebog Ui, gut gesehen. Das war natürlich Quatsch und ist nun entfernt.
12017-06-04 19:23:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you checkt the tagging of this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494161242
The tag looks a bit strange:
"3 =\tcement_block"

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-04 19:06:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 115 ways have the key "operater", which should read "operator". Could you have a look and fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-05 02:12:47 UTCSupaplex Sure, I'll fix it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49254949
12017-06-04 19:00:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tags
"Gresham Street=no" and "Winchester Walk = no" in your edits. Could you explain this?

Thanks, Jan
22017-06-04 20:26:47 UTCMacLondon Sorry, these were pasted in error. I have removed them both,
Thanks, Mac
12017-06-03 16:46:14 UTCkreuzschnabel Diese Änderung hat Teile der Burgstraße etwa 300 m nach Westen verschoben, fast zum Bahnhof, und zehn andere, damit verbundene Straßen gleich hinterher! Sieht wild aus, ich bekomme das nicht auf die Schnelle sortiert. Baust du das bitte _gleich_ wieder zurück?

Leider haben ...
22017-06-03 19:13:39 UTCmueschel Großteils korrigiert in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49227401
Direkt am Platz östlich der Burg stimmt noch eine Kleinigkeit nicht, und die living_street-Fläche mit durchgehenden Straßen sieht merkwürdig aus, liegt aber nicht an diesem Changeset.
32017-06-04 10:38:02 UTCfkMohr Ich bitte vielmals um Entschuldigung!
Wollte lediglich die Wanderweg-Route aktualisieren. Als ich das mit den Straßen dann sah, wollte ich alles rückgängig machen, fand aber keine Möglichkeit mehr dazu.
Kann man bereits gespeicherte Änderungen nicht mehr unwirksam machen?...
42017-06-04 10:51:22 UTCkreuzschnabel Das mit dem Straßen-Ziehen muss ein Versehen gewesen sein; da waren wohl noch einige Nodes selektiert und sind dann mit der Maus mitgewandert. Wanderrouten werden in OSM als Relationen abgebildet, in denen die betreffenden Straßen(abschnitte) drin sind oder nicht; dazu muss eine Stra&szl...
52017-06-04 11:03:30 UTCfkMohr Danke; ich hatte nach einer "Verschiebemöglichkeit" für die Wanderwege gesucht, aber nicht gefunden und hatte daher nicht mehr richtige Teile gelöscht und wollte die geänderte Route einfügen. Derzeit sind alle drei Routen (26, 28 & 29, wieso zweimal 28?) unterb...
62017-06-04 11:35:54 UTCfkMohr Teilweise wurde die Führung von Weg 29 durch Weg 26 ersetzt; möglicherweise gibt es auch dafür ein Funktion, so dass Löschen und Neuerstellen nicht optimal wäre.
72017-06-04 12:17:25 UTCkreuzschnabel Mein Hund lässt ausrichten, wenn du noch was im Kühlschrank hast, können wir auch gern einen kleinen Ausflug nach Oberjosbach unternehmen und uns das gemeinsam anschauen.
82017-06-04 12:50:16 UTCfkMohr Ich bin zu Hause (Bohnheck 20, unweit BZO); nur Hundefutter habe ich nicht.
92017-06-04 13:08:58 UTCkreuzschnabel Dann sach ich ma, wir stehen gegen 16 Uhr vor der Tür von http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368529588. Eventuelle Katzen am besten außer Sicht schaffen :-)
102017-06-04 13:19:29 UTCfkMohr Freue mich, Euch kennenzulernen ...
12017-06-03 13:43:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
these wells contain quite some foreign tags. E.g. lon and lat should not appear as tags in OSM, keys should not use capital letters. Could you have a look and correct this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-02 10:52:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
did you really mean "bear = yes"?
And, could you move the node to one side of the road? I guess the restaurant is not in the middle of the street?
12017-06-02 10:45:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier gibt es einige Nodes mit ungewöhnlichen Tags wie "GB 58; GH = path". Könntest du da mal nachschauen und korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan
22017-06-07 10:54:39 UTCwhb Danke für den Hinweis!
Habe die Fehler verbessert.
12017-06-02 10:43:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added more than 30 ways with the tag "Highway=Footway" - please note that all tags are case sensitive and these should be lower case.

Also, elevators are tagged "min level" and "max level". According to the wiki, this should be e.g. "level = 0;1;2;3&quo...
12017-06-02 10:30:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several objects with very strange tags here, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496152016
area=89.7593806393
cota_p_a=55.41
fotografia=0
gid=44424
id_edifica=44424
id_lev=0.0
latlon=40°32'4.418"N 8°27'43.439"W
perimetro=56.7...
12017-05-31 09:53:38 UTCfreeExec please revert
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Lifecycle_prefix_.28.3Cstatus.3E:.3Ckey.3E_.3D_.3Cvalue.3E.29
22017-05-31 10:12:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
both versions are in use. The reason for my edit was your spelling mistake "constraction"
32017-05-31 15:50:07 UTCfreeExec It was necessary to correct the typo.
And now marked by a kind of amenity that does not exist in reality. Secondly, after the opening, more work is done to return the tag.
42017-05-31 16:25:37 UTCmueschel Alright, I changed it back.
12017-05-31 09:09:03 UTCopendcc Bicycle = official on a non rectangular building? Are you sure?
22017-05-31 09:19:28 UTCmueschel You're right, that's strange. I didn't put the tag there. I fixed the spelling of the key, but didn't notice it being strange for a building.

We have to ask rowers2, e.g. in this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48947839
12017-05-29 16:05:25 UTCMarkus366 Hallo,
dieser und weitere Abschnitte einer geplanten/ im Bau befindlichen Straßen wurden zuletzt mehrfach von verschiedenen Nutzern unterschiedlich getaggt. Häufig wurden die Schlüssel highway:construction , trunk: und construction: hin und her geändert. Vielleicht können ...
22017-05-29 17:14:33 UTCmueschel Siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48979895
12017-05-29 16:02:49 UTCMarkus366 Hallo,
dieser und weitere Abschnitte einer geplanten/ im Bau befindlichen Straßen wurde zuletzt mehrfach von verschiedenen Nutzern unterschiedliche getaggt. Häufig wurden die Schlüssel highway:construction , trunk: und construction: hin und her geändert. Vielleicht können...
22017-05-29 16:29:13 UTCMrWebber Hallo,
Ich weiß gar nicht wo das Problem noch liegt. Ich habe alle Fehler verbessert.

Gruß MrWebber
32017-05-29 17:14:17 UTCmueschel Dann kommentiere ich auch hier und nicht in meinem Changeset:
Erst highway = proposed, dann highway = construction (zunächst mit Tippfehler den ich korrigiert habe). Die letzte Änderung von t2425 verstehe ich nicht ganz, aber das hast du dann ja wieder geradegezogen.
12017-05-28 10:53:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded many objects with very strange tags here, like these:

addr:place \t02050
building \ttran thanh toan
highway \tdhok
landuse \t16092737352
place \t0340302730
shop \t56/26

This looks like something went wrong during an import. Can this be reverted?
Jan
12017-05-28 10:50:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "traffic_signals:directions" 16 times - the correct spelling would be "traffic_signals:direction". Could you fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-28 10:42:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495243526
The tag "loading zone = yes" doesn't exist yet.
Would these tags be what you try to express?
highway = service
area = yes
vehicle = delivery
?
22017-05-29 17:42:52 UTCLAEM Hi,

Yes, thank you.
12017-05-28 10:35:59 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ich habe hier an einigen Nodes den Key "slope_curb" gesehen, "sloped_curb" wäre richtig. Schaust du da mal nach?
Gruß, Jan
22017-05-28 16:04:00 UTCemga Hopla, das sollte natürlich nicht sein, da hab ich mich vertippt. Schau es mir an!
32017-05-28 16:22:42 UTCemga Sollte passen, Danke für den Hinweis
12017-05-28 10:34:32 UTCmueschel Moin,
habe hier an 11 Nodes den Key "sloped_curbs" gesehen - "sloped_curb" wäre richtig.

Gruß, Jan
22017-05-28 11:14:07 UTCThoschi Hi,
danke für den Hinweis. Habe aber jetzt auf die Schnelle nur 6 Nodes wiedergefunden (und geändert).
Gruß Thorsten
12017-05-28 10:22:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4868074917
The tag seems strange:
5653 = sv:Gora_Sad-Ishtrag
22017-05-28 17:05:30 UTCgosausee @mueschel:
thx 4 your info. i changed it!
12017-05-28 10:19:45 UTCmueschel Hi, something went wrong here: You didn't "remove unnecesary tags", but added 100 nodes with just a strange "@id" tag.
Could you fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-05-29 05:55:40 UTCmarianp_telenav Done! Thank's!
Regards, Marian
12017-05-26 09:02:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "barriere = all" on 24 ways - looks like a mistake. Did you mean "barrier = wall"?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-26 08:59:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
deine erste Version "bus_bay =left" ist die laut Wiki korrekte. Das Suffix :left soll nur verwendet werden um weitere Eigenschaften anzugeben. Und ist auch nur dann nötig, wenn bus_bay = both und die Eigenschaften auf beiden Seiten unterschiedlich sind.

Gruß, Jan
22017-05-26 10:28:49 UTCToniE Danke Jan,

dann werde ich mal in mich gehen und nachvollziehen, wo ich das bisher schon gemapped habe. Außer hier wohl nur am westlichen Teil der Truderinger Straße - glaub' ich.

Gruß
Toni
12017-05-24 18:44:32 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert - viele Gebäudedetails gelöscht.
22017-05-24 18:46:28 UTCmueschel Zur Information: Die meisten Gebäude am Campus waren mit vollständigem 3D-Mapping erfasst, siehe z.B. hier:
http://maps.osm2world.org/?zoom=18&lat=50.17364&lon=8.63088&layers=B0TTFF
Die meisten dieser Informationen wurden hier gelöscht.
12017-05-24 18:40:29 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert (Dach gelöscht)
12017-05-24 18:38:44 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert - doppelter POI node, Löschen von existierenden Objekten.
12017-05-24 18:36:52 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert (Löschen von Gebäudedetails)
12017-05-24 09:06:25 UTCmueschel Warum hast du hier alle Informationen zu den Gebäuden (Aussehen, Höhe etc.) gelöscht?
22017-05-24 09:12:12 UTCGoetheUniversitaet Sorry, wenn das so war, dann ohne Absicht. Kannst du es wieder zurücksetzen?
Sind noch neu, kennen uns noch nicht so gut aus. Wir ergänzen auch gleich unser Profil mit weiteren Infos.
32017-05-24 18:35:44 UTCmueschel Ich habe diese Löschung eines Gebäudeteils und Gebäudedetails revertiert.
12017-05-24 18:35:32 UTCmueschel Ich habe diese Löschung eines existierenden Gebäudeteils revertiert.
12017-05-24 11:30:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way got many strange tags - could you check this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494283585
altitudeMode = null
begin = null
building = yes
description = null
drawOrder = null
end = null
extrude = 0
icon = null
postal = yes
tessellate = -1
timestamp = nul...
12017-05-24 11:21:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw the tag "being=sourse" on many objects. Did you want to write "source = bing"?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-23 20:39:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your edits you used the keys
faa:LFSN
faa:LSFN
FAA:LSFN
Could you use just one spelling?
Jan
22017-05-23 20:40:25 UTCmueschel Addendum: FAA:LFSN is used 52 times already
32017-05-24 13:35:32 UTCmicahcochran I'll try to do better spelling it. You are correct that it should be FAA:LFSN. This is "FAA's Landing Facility Site Number". I should probably remove it when there is some other kind of ID.
Thanks,
Micah
12017-05-23 17:26:29 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM!
I found tags like
Jumlah Lantai=1
Kedalaman Pondasi=1 meter
Material Bangunan=Balok Semen
Ventilasi=ada
jenis atap=genteng
jenis lantai=Keramik
on several objects.
This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software c...
12017-05-22 10:19:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 1880 objects with tags like "@id = way/5678989" This looks like a mistake - could you have a look and fix it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-22 19:41:02 UTCTheDutchMan13 Yeah i'll check it out now
32017-05-24 14:44:05 UTCTheDutchMan13 Reverted due to unknown errors
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48949502
42017-05-24 14:44:33 UTCTheDutchMan13 Should be fixed now. Took me a few days to figure it out.
12017-05-21 17:52:52 UTCmueschel Moin,
du hast dieser Straße zwei maxspeeds verpasst, kannst du das mal nachprüfen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177853840/history
22017-05-21 21:32:51 UTCPrince Kassad das war definitiv nicht beabsichtigt. Anscheinend hatte vorher jede Fahrtrichtung ein unterschiedliches maxspeed (30 hin und 50 zurück), woraus dann beim Zusammenfügen "maxspeed=30;50" wurde. Ohne vor Ort gewesen zu sein müsste man aber raten, ob jetzt 30 oder 50 gilt. Was d...
32017-05-21 21:36:42 UTCPrince Kassad Ich hab gerade gesehen dass es für die Ecke frische Mapillary-Bilder gibt. Demnach ist definitiv 30 richtig (ist eine Tempo-30-Zone), 50 ist Schmarrn. Hab das auch schon korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48871202
12017-05-21 16:48:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found four buildings with the tag "ODK =OMK". Looks like a mistake, could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-26 05:15:39 UTCmmahmud Hi, thanks for showing me this. Somehow it got pasted on the features. I will correct them.
:)
12017-05-20 15:39:59 UTCmueschel Diese Straße ist nicht komplett gesperrt, sondern z.Z. nur ein kleiner Abschnitt westlich des Waldes.
12017-05-20 13:45:25 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier in den letzten Jahren ja so einige Wanderrouten eingetragen. Bei den Längenangaben mit dem "distance" Tag hast du aber Kommazahlen benutzt anstelle des in OSM üblichen englischen Punktes als Dezimaltrenner. Würdest du da vielleicht bei Gelegenheit einen ...
22017-06-05 09:28:53 UTCHGSandhagen Hallo Jan,

ich habe die Distanzen der Wanderrouten "OSM-konform" geändert.
Gruß, Hans-Gerd
12017-05-20 13:18:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
ich finde hier einige Wege, bei denen du das "incline" Tag geändert hast, z.B. von "2%" auf den merkwürdigen Text "up,_down,_5%". Könntest du das bitte wieder korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan
12017-05-19 10:48:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you used these tags to describe the Symbol for this route?
background \tred_frame
foreground1 \tred_rectangle
foreground2 \twhite_rectangle

We do have the key "osmc:symbol" to describe such symbols.

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-19 08:54:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw that you are adding destination tags to roads. I would like to remind you that the order of the parts of a key is important, it should always be:
key[:subkey][:lanes][:forward|:backward]
e.g.
destination:colour:lanes:backward

I saw a few keys where this order is mixed.
Cheers, Jan
12017-05-19 08:46:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check this import of nodes? All of them have many foreign keys which should not appear in the OSM data base. The one common key (building=yes) should not be there, because these nodes are not the actual building, which are already in the database.
Jan

http://www.openstreetm...
12017-05-16 10:50:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
some of the ways have strange tags, can they be removed? All necessary information is contained in the relations you added as well.
E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492834831

Jan
12017-05-16 10:44:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? It has only foreign keys:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492361529

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-16 10:36:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of keys. On 35 nodes I found "water_tankt:housenumber" instead of "water_tank:housenumber" Could you have a look and correct these?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-16 10:35:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
I would like to point you to the "Date Namespace": This makes historical entries like yours much easier to read, e.g.
Instead of:
was:2:name \tБородинская улица
was:2:name:end_date \t1918
was:2:name:fi \tBorodinonkatu
was:2:name:ru \tБородинская ули...
12017-05-14 17:54:29 UTCPeilscheibe Hallo mueschel, gibt es irgendeinen besonderen Grund für die Entfernung einer zutreffenden Information? Wurde das Schild geändert?
22017-05-14 17:57:03 UTCmueschel Die Information war doppelt vorhanden. Ich habe nur eine der beiden Angaben "Rietheim 4.3 km;Terrassenfreibad 0.4 km" entfernt.
32017-05-14 20:52:04 UTCPeilscheibe Das war kein Duplikat, das war ein Hinweis auf einen Fehler am Schild. Genauer: was Du gelöscht hast, ist exakt der Text, der auf dem Schild steht (*:signposted). Ich habe das mal wiederhergestellt.
42017-05-14 20:59:30 UTCmueschel Dann schreib doch da bitte eine note="Schreibfehler 'Terasse' auch auf Schild vorhanden", das verstehen dann auch andere Mapper. Neu erfundene Tags, deren Wert eine (fast) Kopie eines anderen Tags sind, versteht niemand und verwirren nur.
12017-05-08 18:50:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
What did you try to add to the database? All nodes you added have some foreign tags which should not be here, and don't have any meaningful ones.
Jan
22017-05-14 14:14:45 UTCmueschel I just reverted these edits as they did not contain any valuable additional information to data already existing.
32017-05-14 20:43:07 UTCgeow Hi cstp, if you are intending to create a route for ski mountaineering (scialpinismo), you might use a route relation
with "type=route + route=piste + piste:type=skitour" see
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4663751 or
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5280864

Ciao
geow\...
12017-05-13 13:00:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the key "gateway = yes" on this node - did you mean "barrier = gate"?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4838972161

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-13 11:41:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found some ways with all foreign tags, and no usual OSM tags:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/p1l
Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan
22017-05-13 19:38:58 UTCRichard L Fixed my one and also another one I found. Thanks for notifying
12017-05-12 10:58:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the Korean key on this relation:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6939871/history
It's new and I don't really see where it comes from.
Jan
22017-05-12 21:06:15 UTCpyram Sorry, maybe a copy&paste-error (no idea).
Thanks for the error check.
Now I fixed the needless one-way-relation too (=> way).
12017-05-12 10:41:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "cossing_ref" 78 times. Correct would be "crossing_ref". Could you have a look and fix this? Cheers, Jan
12017-05-11 09:32:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some trees with strange tags like these:
529=zł
przy=odbiorze
197=162
Could you have a look and correct this? Here is a map with all these nodes:

http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(node%5B%22529%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22529%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22529%22%5D%3B)...
22017-05-11 14:46:29 UTCd3mol3k Thanks for paying attention - something got pasted (I do not know how) - corrected
12017-05-10 11:13:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
just a hint: You used the tag combination "building = yes" "wall = no". You can use "building = roof" instead.

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-11 10:12:51 UTCagab29 Hello Jan,

Unfortunately this building tag is automatically generated by french import cadastre tool.

May be could you suggest your idea to developer at https://trac.openstreetmap.fr/newticket

Best regards

André
12017-05-09 10:49:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way got rather strange tags, could you check and correct that?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34792962

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-09 11:02:07 UTCsebastic Please adjust the tags as you see fit.

The the tags from the outer way were simply moved to the relation as part of the old-style multipolygon fixing effort.

There is a lot of import data in these regions, that is for the local community to deal with.
32017-05-09 11:18:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
thanks for the reply. I think the situation is different for this way, have a look to the full history: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/34792962
It was natural=wood until a week ago, then all tags were deleted by someone else and you added some new tags. I don't see that this w...
42017-05-09 11:30:22 UTCsebastic There were a lot of duplicate node issues in this area. Those were fixed after the JOSM validator reported the issues before uploading the previously old-style multipolygons.
52017-05-09 17:25:00 UTCmueschel I guess natural=wood is right and the rest can be removed?
62017-05-09 18:50:27 UTCsebastic The tags seem to imply so, double check with satellite imagery.
72017-05-09 18:55:54 UTCmueschel Looks fine. I just changed it.
12017-05-09 10:39:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
In this edit, a few mistakes happened.
The tag "amenity=parking" should be put on the area only, but not on all of the nodes the area consists of.
Second, many objects contain many foreign keys which do not belong in the OSM database and should be removed; E.g.
col...
12017-05-08 19:54:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the name of this street? It only has a "nameol" and "old_name" tag.

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-08 19:52:57 UTCmueschel Moin,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127365799
note:motor_vehicle:backward \t= "Zubringerdienst gestattet"

Ist das nicht das, was OSM unter "destination" versteht? In DE entspricht das dem "Anlieger frei".

Gruß, Jan
12017-05-08 18:59:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags - e.g. you added several buildings with the tag "builing" instead of "building".

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-06 14:19:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
dieses Tor hat ein merkwürdiges Tag "max4:10". Kannst du da mal nachschauen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4827515404

Jan
22017-05-06 17:50:21 UTCCassini97 Salve Jan!

Ist doch frängggisch! ;-)

Geändert... jedenfalls, wenn ich die Sitzung gleich hochlade!

Dank und Gruß!
12017-05-06 14:18:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "mofa = n" on this bridge:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490496091 (and its other parts)
Is it 'mofa = no' or 'moped = no'?
Jan
22017-05-06 14:39:56 UTCCarto'Cité Thank for noticing. This has now been fixed to moped=no.
Antoine.
12017-05-06 13:44:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "NaPTANAreaCode" to all of these nodes. I guess this should be converted to "naptan:AtcoCode", as this is a tag used in many other places already.

Jan
12017-05-06 13:42:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many strange tags here, like these:
EntityHand=AEB
ExtendedEn=3 gros { FACING_3 PTE EXT } FACING_3-E01PTE 109710 38.1 0.0 5 { 0 0 0 0 }
Layer=GROS$
SubClasses=AcDbEntity:AcDbPolyline
What is the meaning of all this?
Also, indoor corridors should be tagged as ind...
22017-05-08 13:09:17 UTCMichi92 Dear Jan,

those tags descend from the shape files from which the map was created. For this reason, they will be removed as soon as possible.
The tag highway=footway is necessary to guarantee the beta navigation as Adrien Pavie suggested.

Cheers,

Michela
32017-06-03 09:10:20 UTCmmd Those shapefiles seem to originate from some AutoCAD files. How about the copyright status of those files? In any case, has this been discussed with the community beforehand? Are you aware of the following process? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import
42017-06-04 18:28:34 UTCMichi92 Dear mmd,

the shapefiles were originated from Quantum Gis software, which is open source.
Moreover the plans were officially provided from the building office of "Sapienza" University of Rome .

With my warmest regards,

Michela
52017-06-04 18:32:16 UTCmmd FYI: OSM Data Working Group (DWG) has already started reverting your imports as they don't adhere to OSM standards: see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49230231 as an example.
12017-05-06 13:39:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "name:tok" to many countries. Which language does 'tok' refer to? I can't find it in the list of ISO 639 language codes.
Jan
12017-05-06 13:36:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
this village consists of social facilities only? There are many ways overlapping each other and the objects have tags (like 'facility_t') which don't seem to belong in the OSM database. Could you have a look and correct these issues?
22017-05-06 20:38:48 UTCkmoses28 These tags are in the process of being cleaned up.
12017-05-06 11:48:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
bitte denke daran Knoten zu setzen wenn zwei Wege sich kreuzen, z.B. ein Fußweg der eine Straße überquert.
Habe gerade einige solcher Punkte in Michelstadt korrigiert.

Gruß, Jan
12017-05-06 11:32:00 UTCmueschel Vorsicht beim Korrigieren von diesen duplicate ways - in der Gegend von Würzburg ist das momentane Problem nicht mit ein paar lokalen Edits zu lösen, die machen es eher noch schlimmer weil Reverts nicht mehr möglich sind.
z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491622891

Gruß...
12017-05-06 11:29:06 UTCmueschel Bitte füge keine neuen Wege mehr hinzu die mit anderen Wegen überlappen. Hier in der Region ist ein riesiges Chaos entstanden, das ersteinmal beseitigt werden muss.
12017-04-08 11:40:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
what are all these tags you put on 250++ ways? They are new, not used anywhere else and don't seem to be documented.

escala=drenajes a 1:25000
estado_dre=5102
fecha_modi=08/04/2015
responsabl=Alejandra Gómez Sarmiento
ruleid=1
vigencia=0

Thanks, Jan
22017-05-04 15:31:05 UTCopengislab I tell you because those attributes are that way.
This disaster happened on April 1, 2017.
In Mocoa there was very little information, the task was activated in tasking manager of OSM Colombia, https://tareas.openstreetmap.co/project/50

In two days we managed to map the necessary and the result...
32017-05-04 15:59:10 UTCmueschel I know that this is very useful information and we should try to have this information in the database.
You write:
"igac information was used, which is available and can be used under conditions , And one of them is not to lose the original attributes."

I'm sorry to say, but this mean...
12017-05-03 08:45:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this tagging? Is Frailes the name?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171545533

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-03 14:43:25 UTCFederico Explorador Hi Jan,

I think it is "Fraile", according to IGAC maps, but I have no field evidence for the rivers name.
32017-05-04 10:24:11 UTCmueschel Alright. I'll change the tag "Fraile = Fraile" to "name = Fraile".
12017-05-03 09:30:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this tagging? The maxspeed tag is strange:
openstreetmap.org/way/490097570

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-03 09:37:08 UTChanoj Thanks, I know about tag fail, but I dont found it. Now is correct.
12017-05-03 08:58:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier sind einige Wege mit dem Tag "30=177" entstanden. Schaust du da nochmal nach?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35780993#map=17/47.84284/16.68863

Gruss, Jan
22017-05-04 05:58:24 UTCTBKMrt Hätte maxspeed=30 werden sollen. Danke für den Hinweis - ist korrigiert in #48383540.
12017-05-02 11:11:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "building_material" to 127 objects. The usual spelling is "building:material" with ':' instead of '_'. Could you have a look and correct this?
Cheers, Jan
12017-05-02 11:08:58 UTCmueschel Moin,
was heißt denn "Alfie=Allen" an 30 Bäumen hier?
Gruß, Jan
22017-05-02 16:22:05 UTCq_un_go Moin,

das frage ich mich auch. Keine Ahnung wie mir das passiert ist. Nun ja, nun ist der Alf wieder ein Alien und kein Allen.
Gruß
Winfried
12017-04-30 17:20:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du mal nach dieser Straße schauen? Du hast ihr "maxspeed=50;30" verpasst, aber nur ein Wert kann stimmen.
http://osm.org/way/29341035

Gruß, Jan
22017-05-01 19:06:58 UTCSeparis Oh, danke für den Hinweis. Weiß auch nicht, wie die 30 da reingerutscht ist. Hab ich korrigiert. Gruß Werner
12017-04-30 16:47:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
meintest du hier eventuell "springy"? "swingy" ist mir unbekannt.
http://osm.org/node/4738337035

Gruß, Jan
12017-04-25 15:09:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you have a look to 40 trees added in this changeset? They have the tag "crown_type:=I"
Note the ':' in the key which shouldn't be there. Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan
22017-04-27 08:44:19 UTCtaxi301 Hi .
This is a proposal how to improve the tagging of trees (natural=tree) for the use in 3D-applications.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Marek_kleciak/Tree_table

I was curious if it would show up in 3D, I would improve on type = palm
Sorry for my English but only by translator. Regar...
32017-04-27 17:18:48 UTCmueschel Your tagging is fine. Just a spelling mistake:
You write: "crown_type:"
But it should be: "crown_type"
12017-04-26 09:49:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging changes? E.g. 'ref:-2001-02-12' is not a valid key. There should be a double '--' when using dates according to the wiki.

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-27 08:35:01 UTCfgouget As far as I can tell the wiki says to use " key:-date = value", and that the use of '--' is outdated: "An older version of ISO 8601 used the double hyphen to replace omitted years in partial dates".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Date_nam...
32017-04-27 17:16:24 UTCmueschel Indeed, it does. Since 7 days at least.
There is an extensive discussion on the talk page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Date_specification
12017-04-25 12:56:34 UTClenny32 The addr:* node already exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1522397032
There is no need to create another one at the restaurant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema
22017-04-25 17:51:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
I'm not aware of any tool that makes use of these tags. For most applications the tagged address was unusable. The existence of another node close by with address information is not sufficient to find the actual address of this POI.
The only case how addresses of another object can be used on...
32017-04-26 06:30:46 UTCdgitto It is the tool that have to follow (use) a schema. Not the tag schema follow some tools.
Is normal that no tools exist, when a schema starts to be used.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema
42017-04-26 08:07:33 UTCmueschel Until this schema has been adopted, we have to stick to the old scheme, otherwise we lose information. I.e. both tags have to exist in parallel.
But, I really doubt that any tool will use this tagging, based on a 4 year old draft without even an RFC.
52017-04-26 09:20:24 UTClenny32 It seems to me that an address should be unique (it exists with or without POI) it is an object in its own right. Many POIs have no address.
If it is the same node, when the POI disappears or moves, the address may be deleted or moved with the poi by the inattentive contributor. Contact information...
12017-04-25 15:08:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
this changeset created 9 relations with no common tags - could you check this and replace the foreign keys with common ones if necesseary?

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-24 21:36:00 UTCAthalis Hi, beim way 407255155 wolltest du wahrscheinlich wie bei den anderen Wegen das Komma durch einen Punkt austauschen? Sieht aus als ob der Punkt verloren gegangen ist ;)
22017-04-24 21:47:00 UTCmueschel Ja, der Verdacht liegt nahe ;-) Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe es korrigiert.
12017-04-24 10:47:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, it has a strange tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4806907046
80-84= 41-55

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-24 10:42:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some strange tags to objects, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488399710
"Market = Sub Post Office" and several more. What is the meaning of this?

Please have a look to the wiki to find out how common features like shops have to be tagged to be shown on the map.
...
12017-04-22 15:17:14 UTCdamjang Ok, but so the wiki must be corrected:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone :-)
22017-04-23 13:32:49 UTCmueschel You're right. Looks like somebody wants to distinguish between phone service in Italian language (:it) and an phone number to be reached from Italy only (:IT). Kind of makes sense but is hard to remember.
32017-04-23 21:37:35 UTCdamjang Bacause this is a phone number free only usable from Italy, if for you is ok, I will rechange to upper chars (phone:IT)
42017-04-24 09:36:57 UTCmueschel Yes, sure. It was my mistake.
12017-04-23 10:47:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
schaust du bei diesem Weg nochmal nach den beiden lanes* Tags? Da ist etwas schiefgegangen.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297874842

Gruss, Jan
12017-04-22 11:15:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
the correct tag "addr:housenumber" was changed to the wrong tag "adr:housenumber" on 18.000 buildings in this city. Some of these changes where done in this changeset.
Could you fix that - or let me know if you need help with it.

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-21 08:47:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du nochmal nach dem Tagging schauen '_vertical' ist ein ungewöhnlicher Key.

Gruß, Jan
12017-04-20 19:00:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the "housename" on this building?
http://osm.org/way/332283894

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-28 06:38:32 UTCtanjeff Hello Jan,
the buildings at Layenhof have 4-digit numbers which I mapped as addr:housenumber. The building you mentioned seems to have two numbers (63 and 5872), but I don't remember the details. I will check that when I'm there again (might take 2 weeks). I will add a further comment then.
Regard...
32017-06-11 12:17:45 UTCtanjeff Hello Jan,
Sorry for the delay, I was quite busy. As I wrote, the houses in the area have 4-digit numbers. For most buildings, I mapped this number as addr:housenumber.

But the building in question has two numbers: 64 (not 63) and 5872. I guess that 64 is the number to use when sending letters, ...
12017-04-20 18:56:29 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du nochmal über diese 3 Relationen schauen? Eine ist nicht geschlossen, alle drei haben keinen Namen

http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159115
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159792
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159745

Gruß,...
12017-04-20 10:40:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
you tagged some buildings with "building:wall" and "building:roof". I replaced these tags with the common building:material and roof:material keys. These are in use in many places and are defined in the wiki.

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-20 13:51:21 UTChbrown14 Hi - Thanks! I feel so silly about this tagging mistake. I'll be sure to fix the remaining tag mistakes in this area.
Sudie
12017-04-15 16:38:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
it's a bit strange that this railway in Greece uses German signaling. Could you check that? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4790883029
Jan
22017-04-19 03:44:15 UTCLowe253 Hi Jan,
Greek Railways do actually uses german signalling although this might sound bizarre to people. This is not a full replication of ESO, but a lite version (no train protection system, no electrified rails until late 90's and so on). If you try wikipedia you can check also the historical reas...
32017-04-19 09:04:14 UTCmueschel Alright, I wasn't aware of this. I stumbled across it because of a spelling mistake: railway:signal:main:f should be railway:signal:main:form, I think.
42017-04-19 10:42:03 UTCLowe253 You are right, my bad...
12017-04-18 10:57:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
these POIs have some foreign tags that could (and should) be converted to usual OSM tags, e.g.
ACCESSIBLE
ADDRESS
ADDRESS_FR
NAME_FR
NOTES

Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan
22017-04-18 10:59:23 UTCRps333 I will have a look. thanks
12017-04-18 10:34:42 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du erfindest hier (mal wieder) Unmengen an neuen Tags. Bitte informiere dich über gängige Tags. In der jetztigen Form sind diese Informationen absolut nutzlos.
Beispiele:
bicycle situation
bicycle designating Sign\t
Bicycle path color to walkway
cycle end
cycle path quality\t...
12017-04-17 11:14:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this building, it has many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486855572

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-17 21:19:55 UTCEnigmaQuip Fixed, sorry about that
12017-04-13 08:36:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some nodes with tags light "light_source". Street lamps usually are tagged with "highway=street_lamp", which should be there additional to your tags. Would you mind adding it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-13 14:19:51 UTCMRPockets I specifically chose not to tag them as "highway=street_lamp" since they are not street lamps. They illuminate primarily the grass and sidewalks, not streets. I could not find any better tags for non-street lamps than simply "light_source=lantern." If I am misunderstanding the us...
32017-04-16 19:59:08 UTCmueschel I don't think we do distinguish between street lamps and path lamps. Until we come up with a distinction, I opt for tagging them with the common tag to make them visible on existing maps.
12017-04-16 16:32:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong with this import. The nodes are spread over the ocean...
Also, "Adresse" and "Nom" are no common tags in OSM and should be properly tagged.

Jan
22017-04-19 21:52:39 UTCSomeoneElse @mueschel no reply here so I've reverted these additions and sent the user a message that they have to read before continuing editing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1320 .
Best Regards,
Andy
12017-04-16 16:26:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put some urls to maps in the tags of these objects. I assume you used these as the source of your edits? To you have an permit to use these maps or are these licensed under a license compatible to ODbL?

Jan
22017-04-17 10:55:44 UTCemj Hej, nej detta är ett resultat av cykelturer sedan den snöfria nyårsaftonen till nu. Öppettiderna är från hemsidan dock, jag hade bara fotat dessa på tre av ställena.

Jag gör ganska många kartläggningar som jag inte lägger upp men n&...
32017-04-17 10:57:17 UTCemj English: Yes I've a ODBL + Contributors Term Compatible source for the edit. I'm sorry I was trollnig about the import.
12017-04-15 14:51:00 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier das highway-Tag entfernt, aber es laufen noch einige Wanderrouten über diesen Weg. Wie sieht das vor Ort wirklich aus?
http://osm.org/way/23325729

Gruß, Jan
22017-04-16 16:51:05 UTCmaction Hallo Jan,
nachdem die Neugestaltung der Rheinwiesen und der Uferpromenade gestartet war, hatte ich das Attribut highway der betroffenen Straßen und Wege entsprechend dem damaligen (4/2016) Zustand mit dem Lifecycle-Prefix demolished versehen. Heute sind die neuen und teils alten Straße...
12017-04-14 11:09:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added more than 6000 buildings with a misspelled house number tag: "adr:housenumber" instead of "addr:housenumber". Could you have a look and fix that? Let me know if you need help.

Jan
12017-04-12 11:29:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are six nodes like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4784899723
They don't have any common tag. Could you have a look?

Jan
22017-04-12 11:48:37 UTCzerpou Hi Jan,

I have integrated these points with her substations

Have a good day,

Albin
12017-04-12 10:36:21 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check the tagging of these 3 rivers?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485498407
The tag "Barranco del Pico = Rio Nuerna" looks a bit strange.
Jan
22017-04-12 11:44:39 UTCdalop Thanks for the advise, It was my mistake! I just fixed that now
12017-04-12 08:51:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 80 buildings with many foreign tags like the ones shown below.
I don't think they belong into the OSM database - can they be removed?

Cheers, Jan

ADAT=2013-05-08 09:04
ANDAMAL_1=130
ANDAMAL_10=0
ANDAMAL_1T=Bostad; Småhus friliggande
ANDAMAL_2=0
ANDAMAL_3=0
ANDAMAL_4=0...
22017-04-12 11:00:13 UTCDalkvist He was doing some incompatible sourced imports, they have stopped now and I have emailed dwg to redact the changesets.
12017-04-11 19:52:02 UTCBob Moin!
Eine no_entry restriction (hier: Deine Änderung an der Relation 6848355) kann mehrere from-Mitglieder haben, so steht es im Wiki. Das gelöschte Mitglied habe ich daher wiederhergestellt. Das aufgestellte Zeichen 267 betrifft beide Richtungen.
22017-04-11 20:02:08 UTCmueschel Auf den meisten Wiki-Seiten steht "exakt 1", auch auf der Deutschen. Nur die tschechische und englische Seite erlauben mehrere für no_entry.

Ich würde die Relation vielleicht lieber verdoppeln, je eine für jeden from-Weg. Wer weiß, welcher Router damit Probleme hat.
32017-04-12 10:42:00 UTCPeilscheibe @mueschel: Die no_entry und no_exit-restrictions wurden ja genau zu dem Zweck so definiert, das man eben nicht mehrere Relationen braucht, wo eine genügt. Wenn ein Router nicht mit mehreren from- bzw. to-ways klarkommt, darf er gerne dazulernen.
42017-04-12 15:54:14 UTCBob Moin zusammen!
Die deutsche Wiki-Seite ist dazu leider wohl veraltet. Sie kennt die no_entry und no_exit restriction (noch) nicht. Die kamen erst 2011 hinzu und die Übersetzung hat noch keiner angepackt.
12017-04-09 10:49:25 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier eine Tags neu erfunden, die sonst nirgends verwendet werden:

parking:condition:cost
parking:condition:duration
parking:condition:note
parking:condition:user\tparking:condition:vehicle

Bitte schau mal im Wiki nach den üblichen Tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w...
22017-04-10 07:01:55 UTCFrank Bielig Die Tags gibt es teilweise schon. Leider sind viele Tags mit entweder :both:, :right: oder :left: versehen. Hier trifft aber keine dieser Varianten zu.
32017-04-10 09:32:25 UTCmueschel "cost" -> "fee"
"interval" -> "time_interval"
"duration" -> "maxstay"
"vehicle" und "user" gibt es nicht, das muss über condition angegeben werden wenn es Einschränkungen gibt.

Die Tags gehö...
42017-04-10 10:36:40 UTCFrank Bielig "Die Tags gehören eigentlich an die Straße selbst, ..."
Das ist der eigentliche Diskussionspunkt. Bei der Wahl der Tagnamen sind wir leidenschaftslos, könnte auch immer leicht angepasst werden. Schwieriger ist der Punkt, wie die Geometrien aufgenommen werden. Wir haben u...
52017-04-10 11:32:25 UTCRalf Bielig "Die Tags gehören eigentlich an die Straße ..."

Das sehe ich dann problematisch, wenn:
* die Parkstreifen beider Straßenseiten physisch weit auseinander liegen, z.B. bei mehrspurigen Straßen.
* die Parkkonditionen sich alle paar Meter ändern oder auf beiden...
62017-04-10 11:48:00 UTCmueschel Ja, ideal ist das vorhandene Schema nicht. Ich denke, sowas sollte mal in größerer Runde diskutiert werden, z.B. im Forum mit ein paar gut ausgewählten Beispielen.
Das beste Tagging nützt ja am Ende nichts, wenn es die Auswerter nicht umsetzen wollen oder können.
72017-04-10 14:23:15 UTCNakaner Hallo Frank,

wer ist denn "wir"? Falls ihr organisiert oder mit kommerziellen Absichten in OSM editiert, solltet ihr das samt der Motivation und eurer Pläne offenlegen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
82017-04-10 15:53:52 UTCFrank Bielig Hallo Michael,
"uns", Kollegen mit großem Interesse an digitalen Karten und langjährige Nutzer von OSM, möchten nur helfen, ein weiteres Feature bei OSM zu etablieren, welches ein Grundübel des heutigen Straßenverkehrs in Metropolen beseitigen hilft: Parkpl&au...
12017-04-10 11:00:18 UTCmueschel Servus,
ich finde hier mehrmals "lity = sign" - sieht irgendwie nach Tippfehler aus.
Gruß, Jan
22017-04-10 15:27:12 UTCPeilscheibe Autsch. Vermutlich eine Teamleistung von Autovervollständigung und schnellem Finger ;-) Danke für's finden, ist repariert.
12017-04-04 14:34:50 UTCmueschel Could you please point me to the discussion page of this mechanical edit?
22017-04-04 19:14:35 UTCti-lo It's not mechanical, but manual
32017-04-04 19:29:41 UTCmueschel Even then, this has to be discussed beforehand (as you were told by the DWG this afternoon).
- > 600 objects edited worldwide within a single day
- in the ~ 10 cases I checked, some information was lost (e.g. used bikes and new bikes sales replaced by a single 'sales' tag)
- there are tags wit...
42017-04-09 14:00:19 UTCti-lo Sorry for the late answer, didn't get the notification somehow.
- Who is DWG ?
- Could you send me some examples for the "lost information" issue ?
- spelling mistakes shouldn't have happened as I mostly use copy & paste for the tags, but if you find errors, I'll correct them
- I c...
52017-04-09 15:33:33 UTCmueschel DWG = Data Working Group, the guys who gave you this block: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1293

lost information - this is very hard to find, given that you retagged thousands of stores and you have to look in the history of these nodes
"removing an established tagging scheme com...
62017-04-09 16:55:16 UTCti-lo Regarding DWG : Sent this message with explanations of my actions and was then unblocked immediately : woodpeck 4. April 2017 15:45
"well documented" is really an euphemism for the status before.
- (motorcycle) "clöthes" was not defined
- for "rental" there we...
72017-04-10 11:54:52 UTCDaveF Although this entity was tagged indirectly in the first place (it should be shop not amenity), you made it worse by removing any primary tag & substituting with a sole sub-tag. Sub-tags are 'adjective' tags which help describe the details of the objects.
82017-04-10 17:31:06 UTCti-lo That's right, I corrected it.
Pretty strange as I was sure I checked the entry when I answered ("Sorry for the late answer"). I once had an effect that a history entry disappeared (I edited an entry, later someone else edited it again, my edits were still there, but the history entry miss...
92017-04-10 17:41:43 UTCti-lo mea culpa, I checked the others, seems I didn't pay attention to this, correcting them now
12016-12-04 12:26:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "atl_name" on 40 nodes - this should be "alt_name". Would you mind correcting these?
Jan
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ksp
22017-04-02 15:23:52 UTCmueschel Hi (again),
this upload also contains several hundred nodes without any tags. Can these be deleted?
Jan
32017-04-02 16:44:56 UTCrashaurl Hello,
You do not need to delete them, these are blanks. Thank you
42017-04-08 14:44:38 UTCmueschel What do you mean by 'blanks'? Single nodes without tags are just useless.
52017-04-10 12:18:17 UTCrashaurl Billet, in order to then add tags.
I understandably wrote?
62017-04-10 12:18:51 UTCrashaurl i use gogle translate))
12017-04-08 11:43:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these buildings have a strange key that is not used in any other place:
tipo_const=NO CONVENCIONAL
What does it mean?
Btw, this looks a lot like an import, could you point me to the discussion and documentation of it on the mailing list or wiki?

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-04 15:40:48 UTCopengislab I tell you because those attributes are that way.
This disaster happened on April 1, 2017.
In Mocoa there was very little information, the task was activated in tasking manager of OSM Colombia, https://tareas.openstreetmap.co/project/50

In two days we managed to map the necessary and the result...
32017-05-11 20:15:48 UTCsmaprs Also almost all buildings have the same tags:
"building:levels=7".
But in fact, as can be seen in images, most buildings are houses of only 1 level (some few have 2 or 3).
What happened?
Was those same tags accidentallly copied/applied to all buildings?
12017-04-07 19:48:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
'abandoned' is written 'abandoned' and not 'abandonded'. Could you have a look and correct this on >60 objects?
Cheers, Jan
22017-04-08 16:21:45 UTCChristian Madsen Thank you for the feedback. Looks like JOSM has replicated a misspelling instead of the correct phrase. I will change it first opportunity I get.
32017-04-13 17:46:24 UTCChristian Madsen There, I think got them all now. Please comment if there are anyone left.
12017-04-06 15:46:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added more than 120 buildings with the misspelled key 'buiilding'. Could you have a look and correct this?
Jan
12017-04-04 17:18:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of these tags?

numero_pis=1
numero_sot=0
tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL
tipo_domin=PRIVADO

Also, it looks like the images you use are misaligned, many of the buildings are intersecting the road (which seems to be in the right place according to GPS traces)
Could...
22017-04-04 23:15:20 UTCNicoVargas Yeah, it was caused by a direct import of an area not covered by the IGAC image we were using.

numero_pis=1 (# of floors )
numero_sot=0 (# of basement)
tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL (i think is a building with strong materials as cement, an so)
tipo_domin=PRIVADO (private)

This issue maybe remai...
32017-04-05 17:07:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
I can change the numero_pis to building:levels and building:levels:underground. I don't think we have an equivalent for the other two, should I delete them?
42017-04-05 17:34:30 UTCNicoVargas Yes please, replace it and delet it :) Many thanks
52017-04-05 18:48:45 UTCmueschel Ok, did in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47486023
12017-04-04 15:48:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377910114

The key 'ch]' looks like a mistake.
Jan
22017-04-04 19:47:24 UTCdudone Hi Jan

Many thanks for spotting this. I have removed the tag. There was also a highway=track tag missing for the way above this which I have now added.

Regards
Dudley
12017-04-02 15:46:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the name tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4766343316

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-03 07:01:24 UTCChristian Madsen Ops, my bad. Thanks for the feedback.
12017-04-02 15:38:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this building?
"Arme = Klarenstraat"
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70840140

Jan
22017-04-02 17:18:00 UTCJakka "Arme = Klarenstraat" deleted
12017-04-02 15:33:07 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du benutzt hier 70x den key "generator:mode" - das sollte eigentlich "generator:method" heißen. Korrigierst du das noch?

Grüße, Jan
12017-04-02 14:46:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
in this area you created a lot (~ 1000) of nodes without any tag which don't belong to a way or relation. I guess this was a mistake and they can be deleted?
E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/4311927621

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-02 14:42:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong on some of the buildings you added: The ways are not correct, containing some nodes more than once. Could you have a look and correct these? Here is a map with error markers (Keepright):
osm.mueschelsoft.de/keepright/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=48.62793&lon=38.93588...
12017-04-02 14:17:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
I noticed some issues with this (huge) import of ~20000 trees.
- The nodes have several tags which are not defined in the wiki, such as
age,constituency, form, plot_number, site_name, usrn, ward
- I didn't find a discussion on this import. Was it announced on the mailing list?
- the 'height...
22017-04-27 14:01:51 UTCbrianboru This is now documented for discussion at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Birmingham_City_Council_trees_data following talk-gb converstions and is paused until issues are resolved
12017-04-01 17:17:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:17:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
22017-04-02 11:02:16 UTCjohanespeter9 thank you so much, i am still clearing data let me rectify right now
12017-04-01 17:17:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:17:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:16:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:16:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:14:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like this import went wrong - there is a huge amount of foreign tags on the ways. Could you clean this up?
Jan
12017-04-01 12:38:19 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was ist denn das hier: http://osm.org/way/331073395
Eine Fußgängerbrücke? Dann sollte noch "highway=path" ergänzt werden.
Gruß, Jan
12017-04-01 12:17:44 UTCmueschel Wurde die von dir geänderte Kreuzung hier umgebaut? Im Augenblick stimmen die Wege nämlich nicht mehr mit Bing überein.
Gruß, Jan
12017-03-30 13:27:08 UTCmueschel Hallo,
fast 60 der Gebäude haben das Tag "roof:sharp" anstelle von "roof:shape". Kannst du das noch korrigieren?
Griß, Jan
22017-03-30 14:26:32 UTCanbr Ja, den Tippfehler habe ich korrigiert ...
12017-03-30 13:26:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 50 points with keys POINT_X and POINT_Y. I guess this was a mistake and should be deleted?
Jan
12017-03-26 15:00:57 UTCmueschel Hallo Micha,
kannst du rund um diesen Weg noch nach den Bus-Relationen und dem Spurtagging schauen? Das stimmt jetzt alles nicht mehr.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42937214

Gruß, Jan
12017-03-26 12:53:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 6 ways (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337771983) with the key "ad]" - could you check and correct this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-26 14:32:39 UTCTomas Straupis Fixed. Thank you for noticing.
12017-03-25 12:24:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
here are 749 buildings with the tag "_building_1_=yes". Could you fix that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-03-25 11:46:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of three ways, including this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482320633
other_tags = "surface"=>"unpaved","tracktype"=>"2"
specifiche =5
trekking =1

Jan
12017-03-24 08:41:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
du nutzt hier das Tag 'night_only'. Nachtbusse werden normalerweise mit "by_night = only" getagged. Vielleicht willst du das noch anpassen?
Gruß, Jan
22017-03-26 20:56:50 UTCFlutus Ich dachte schon dass es eines geben müsste, hab aber keins gefunden.
Ist geändert.
12017-03-22 11:38:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used these tags:
traffic_signals:ground = yes
traffic_signals:light = yes
They are not in use in any other place yet - what is their meaning?
Jan
22017-03-22 12:05:19 UTCmweper Hi @mueschel.
This news talks about the tags (invented by now) that I put, since I did not know if there was a tag for that.
-
http://rosarionoticias.gob.ar/page/noticias/id/77308/title/Se-puso-en-funcionamiento-el-primer-semáforo-peatonal-de-piso-del-país
--
I put both for the do...
32017-03-22 12:22:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
alright. I would go with the 'floor_light' version. Please add an entry to the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
Recently, a similar installation was made in the Netherlands.
42017-03-26 20:06:58 UTCmweper Is it okay like this?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#How_to_add_a_floor_light_for_pedestrians.3F
12017-03-22 11:29:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your changesets I found a huge set of wrong tags, like these:
High way = Footpath
Water ways = intermediate
farm land \t= farm

Please have a look to the wiki how paths, rivers and buildings are tagged and use only these tags. Everything else is useless, because none of our software ca...
12017-03-21 11:54:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag 'addr:contact = yes' on many POIs. This is a new tag and not defined anywhere - what does it mean?
Jan
Jan
22017-03-21 12:39:15 UTCTomas Straupis It is a temporary tag to mark duplicate addresses until contact:* scheme is approved or at least we (Lithuanian mapping community) come to agreement that support of contact:* is good enough. For the time being f.e. iD editor does not support contact:*
We need this addr:contact info for QA and later...
12017-03-21 11:05:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. in your edits you used tags like '2nd floor occupant', 'other occupants' and several similar ones. These are not defined in the wiki and therefore are rather useless because none of our software can understand it. Please have a look to the wiki how POI like offices and shops hav...
12017-03-20 13:32:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
Could you check the spelling of tags? I found many 'buiding:levels' with a missing 'l'.

Jan
22017-03-21 03:59:09 UTCJessAk71 Oops so sorry my mistake on the missing letter I will double check and fix all them next week. Thanks for letting me know.
12017-03-20 09:38:58 UTCmueschel Partially reverted. Reason: features do not exist.
12017-03-20 09:37:30 UTCmueschel I reverted this changeset. Reason: This is a stream, not a man_made=breakwater
12017-03-20 09:36:26 UTCmueschel I reverted this changeset. Reason: This is not a park.
12017-03-19 15:12:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you have a look to the spelling of tags? E.g. I found
'electrifie' which should be 'electrified'
name_fa -> name:fa
full_name_ -> full_name
and few more. I corrected some of them but I don't know if I catched all.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-19 15:03:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please make sure you use only keys which are described in the Wiki. If you use other keys (like ones in Russian), no software can understand it and e.g. display it on a map.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-20 08:35:28 UTCopeihatebot А смещение для спутниковых снимков кто будет устанавливать?
32017-03-20 09:19:20 UTCandygol Я відмінив цей набір змін (див. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47006199)

This changeset was reverted by me (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47006199)
42017-03-20 09:34:47 UTCandygol Шановний Виик
Зважаючи на факт, що це ваша перша спроба участі в ОСМ, пропоную вам ознайомитись з деякими статями у Вікі проекту, які допоможуть вам зробити ваші зм...
12017-03-19 14:59:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
did you consider using the 'destination_sign' tagging for these signs?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign

This makes using the data much simpler like on this sign:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinationsign/example/#node=3908107513
22017-03-19 20:58:22 UTCCarlo Folini Hi,
no...but I definitely have to take a look into it! It seems very interesting
12017-03-19 14:50:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4741782702

hig=yes looks like a mistake

Jan
12017-03-19 14:44:48 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier bei einigen Tags ein '-' vorangestellt um sie zu 'deaktivieren'. Normalerweise benutzt man dafür einen der lifecycle prefixes, wie hier beschrieben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Wahrscheinlich passt 'disused:' hier.
Gruß, Jan
22017-03-19 15:41:39 UTCProtoxenus Ja, meine Intention war, das das (wahrscheinlich defekte) Molenfeuer nicht gerendert wird. Ich gehe davon aus, das es zu Saisonbeginn wieder in Betrieb geht.
Ich hatte auch erst überlegt, das anders kenntlich zu machen, aber ich fand nichts passendes. "Disused" ist nach meinem Sprach...
12017-03-17 12:09:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
this area doesn't have any valid tag. Could you check this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480839466

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-17 14:38:12 UTCjohanemilsson I placed the leisure tag in a relation. I should probably just remove the other tags as they are not really necessary.
32017-03-18 12:49:02 UTCmueschel The relation is fine, but those tags should be deleted if they are not needed. Maybe you want to keep one tag with an ID to be able to match this object again with your external data source.
Jan
12017-03-18 12:46:47 UTCmueschel Hi, you used the new key 'name:Zh_py' on 59 ways. the common version is 'name:zh_py', used 900 times already. Would you mind changing this?

Cheers, Jan
12016-10-30 12:57:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
5500 nodes have a misspelled tag "addrpostcode".
Btw, are you sure that the license of your source allows use for OSM? CC BY and ODbL are not compatible!

Jan
22016-10-30 13:46:15 UTCdan980-import Hi, we got this authorization letter: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/7/77/Autorizzazione_sardegna_openstreetmap.pdf
32016-10-30 13:50:19 UTCmueschel Alright, maybe you can add a remark on the wiki page?
42016-10-30 13:51:46 UTCdan980-import yes, I'm gonna update it as soon as possible
52016-10-30 14:01:25 UTCsabas88 CC-BY-SA isn't compatible, CC-BY is (provided we add a proper attribution on the changeset)
62017-03-17 21:38:03 UTCmueschel cc-by is not compatible. See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
(Doesn't affect this import, because of the explicit authorization)
12017-03-17 15:12:06 UTCToniE Danke, wieder ein typo von mir?
22017-03-17 19:29:53 UTCmueschel Aus "surfarce" habe ich "surface" gemacht - passiert nun mal beim Tippen.
12017-03-17 12:11:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4303618075

The tag ref`... = grid_bin doesn't look right.

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-17 09:42:56 UTCbrianboru Finger trouble! Thanks - corrected
12017-03-17 11:53:09 UTCmueschel Hi, the trees you add have a strange tag: "2016 = 298". I corrected some yesterday, but there are more you added today. I guess it should be "ref = 2016.298". Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-03-16 11:37:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480408120
The tag is wrong - and I don't know how to correct it. Looks like 'landuse = forest', but I can't see a forest here, just few individual trees.

Jan
12017-03-16 11:17:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added areas with strange tags that are not defined anywhere, like these:
area \tyes
area6 \tsubarea6
name \tsubarea6

What did you try to tag here? Some type of boundary? Please check the wiki on how to tag them properly, in the current state this data can not be interpreted by any sta...
22017-03-20 19:11:49 UTCHausemer Problem fixed!
12017-03-15 16:58:16 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check the tagging of some of the buildings, e.g.

buildingxx:floor should be floor:material
building:walls should be building:material
building:roof should be roof:material

Those tags are described in the wiki, please check the other tags as well.

Jan
12017-03-15 16:15:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 59 objects with the key 'bulding'. Would you mind fixing this? 'building'

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-14 11:51:58 UTCmueschel Do these streets really have the German name as part of their official name? If not, please use name:de for the German name.
Jan
12017-03-14 11:34:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the keys "vertical height", "vertical_height", "vertical_rise" to map the height difference of aerialways. These tags are not used in any other place. Typically, start and end node of the aerialway are tagged with 'ele' to mark their respective height.
\...
22017-03-14 18:05:15 UTCIrakli Ika Ok I will use ele insted, thank you.
12017-03-14 11:29:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
den Key 'wheelchair:approachable' gibt es bis jetzt noch nicht. Ich würde da einfach "wheelchair = yes" setzen, und wenn es noch eine Einschränkung gibt mit "wheelchair:description" arbeiten.

Gruß, Jan
22017-03-14 12:20:41 UTCPeilscheibe Hallo,
klar gibt's den, hier zum Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4732885191 ;-)
wheelchair=yes beschreibt die Benutzbarkeit eines Objekts mit dem Rollstuhl selbst, z. B. als Attribut an einem Fußgängerüberweg oder einer Toilette.
Nähmen wir als Beispiel nun mal d...
32017-04-23 06:35:24 UTCJPaulW Hey,
in dem Changeset sind ein paar Änderungen von track->path und track->service die ich absolut nicht nachvollziehen kann. Könntest du mal erklären was du gegen track an den Stellen hattest?
Viele Grüße
42017-04-23 08:36:21 UTCPeilscheibe Hallo JPaulW,

klar, gerne.
Zunächst haben wir in der Systematik in OSM eine Unterscheidung in Wirtschaftswege für land- bzw. forstwirtschaftlichen Verkehr (track - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack), die Widmung ist regelmäßig durch Beschilderung erk...
12017-03-14 11:17:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag 'with' on 29 ways. It should be spelled 'width' - could you have a look and fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-03-17 15:22:57 UTCGuyVV Hi,
Bedankt voor het opmerken.
Hopelijk heb ik ze nu allemaal verbeterd.
Grt,
Guy
12017-03-13 21:28:43 UTCmueschel Hallo,
"fee:no = yes" - das Tag gibt es nicht. Entweder fee=yes oder fee=no, was stimmt?
Gruss, Jan
22017-03-13 22:02:47 UTCChemist72 Hast Recht, Jan. Sorry & danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit. Ich hatte es velwechsert mit payment:none=yes. Ist korrigiert. Es kostet nichts. Ist eh noch im Bau.
12017-03-13 21:23:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
found 3 ways with all strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480097548
Could you check & correct this?

Jan
22017-03-13 21:54:00 UTCEnigmaQuip Fixed, sorry about that
12017-03-13 21:21:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
schau dir mal das Tagging von diesem Way an, da ist was schiefgelaufen:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47435488

Gruss, Jan
22017-03-13 22:03:27 UTCbielebog Auha, das gehört _da_ nicht rein. Das war ein Cut'n Paste-Fehler. Gut gesehen, danke.
12017-03-13 19:14:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node? Looks weird.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4571244663

Jan
22017-03-14 00:37:24 UTCMacLondon Thanks Jan,
I have now corrected my completely mistyped entry to what I had intended to enter
12017-03-13 19:07:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used various spellings of the same key:
'physically _challenged'
'physically_challenged'
'physically_ challenged'
'physically challenged'
Please, use only one spelling, otherwise the data is rather useless. Also, please use tags that are already in use and don't invent new ones. 'physi...
12017-03-12 15:06:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
what are all these nodes? None of them has any tag. Could you check this and / or delete them?

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-12 13:01:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
are those 'meta' tags on this building really necessary? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436232310

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-12 12:46:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded 220 objects with the tag "Yess = Building". Could you correct this? 'building=yes' would be correct.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-12 12:36:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
On this node you used some non-English keys to describe the object: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4726295753

In OSM one must use common tags as described in the Wiki - otherwise the information can not be interpreted correctly by software. Please have a look to the wiki ...
12017-02-23 10:12:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
habe hier gerade ein paar 'backwart' in 'backward' korrigiert.

Und ein kleiner Tipp:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121635637
Die Angabe der Autobahn hier ist ein Fall für destination:ref:to und destination:symbol:to weil es sich um einen Hinweis auf eine zu erreichende, aber entfer...
22017-02-24 13:03:09 UTCsennewald63 Hallo mueschel,
danke für die Berichtigung von 'backward' .
Mite dem destination:ref:to und destination:symbol:to stehe ich auf Kriegsfuß, da es für mich zu unausgegoren ist.
Im Proposed features/Destination details https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination...
32017-02-24 18:04:32 UTCmueschel Hier hatte ich mal eine kleine Zusammenstellung im Wiki gemacht:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging

Mein Tool ist da sicher nicht das Maß der Dinge - ich rendere einfach das, was ich für wichtig halte. Zur besseren Darstellung sind die :to nur ein kle...
42017-03-10 19:10:38 UTCsennewald63 Ich habe mir deine Erklärungen unter "User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging" nochmal rein gezogen und dabei drei Probleme gefunden.
1. Du solltest mit angeben, dass auch "destination:symbol:to*" für die Einsortierung des entsprechenden Symbols notwendig ist.
2. Die Farbe b...
52017-03-11 13:55:09 UTCmueschel Lass uns das per Mail besprechen, ich schreibe dir gerade.
12017-03-10 08:17:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/253789222
There are several 'linz:' tags on thia node - was this a mistake?
Jan
22017-03-10 08:41:19 UTCworldwidewolford It looks like those tags predate my edit. I am on and have been editing on mobile, so any research you can do into those tags would be great, but they were not added by me.
Cheers
32017-03-10 15:55:24 UTCmueschel Before your edit the keys were in upper case, e.g. LINZ:layer. These are very common in NZ.
You changed it to lower case - might be a software issue with OsmAnd?
42017-03-10 20:31:14 UTCworldwidewolford Oh wow. This must be an issue with OsmAnd. I will send a bug report about that. Could you fix those tags for me? Thanks for picking that up.
52017-03-11 13:41:59 UTCmueschel Changed the tags back.
12017-03-11 13:37:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you added many buildings with the tag "addr:pro" which should be "addr:province". Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nqy
12017-03-10 09:27:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded a huge sset of objects, which are mainly tagged with foreign tags which most likely should not appear in Osm. Could you check and correct this?
Jan

Examples:
ACCESS_TYP=Open Access
ACRES=48.743
AGNCY_ID=1328
AGNCY_LEV=City
AGNCY_NAME=Scotts Valley, City...
22017-03-10 17:34:49 UTCstevea I wouldn't say "huge" as it is a few dozen edits over the course of a few hours in a single day (and I'm not done yet) against the over 12,000 edits I have entered over the last eight years.

Is your problem with "foreign tags?" I kept these in to distinguish these CPAD polygo...
32017-03-10 17:56:39 UTCmueschel I didn't complain about the import of the polygons as such. That's fine if it is done carefully.
I'd suggest to keep one ref tag only, like ref:CPAD. This should be sufficient to allow for future updates.

Other tags like ACRES and COUNTY are just redundant because they can easily be retrieved f...
42017-03-10 18:06:41 UTCstevea Thank you for your quick reply. I can certainly endeavor to reduce and/or conflate tags on future CPAD polygon entries, as I do agree that they do contain a large amount of metadata. Some is useful and some is not (to OSM) and as long as a polygon in OSM can be identified as mapping back to a uniq...
12017-03-10 09:35:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw several keys with spaces in your edits. Please check the spelling of keys. Examples:

'fire operator' -> 'fire_operator'
'water tank: street' -> 'water_tank:street'
(and several more)
Jan
12017-03-10 09:29:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used some new landcover tags in your edits to specify density and age. I think it would be a good idea to describe these tags in the wiki by writing a proposal for them.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-10 14:15:16 UTCigitov Hi,
thanks for comment.
These landcover tags are still "raw", not final.
In the Russian-speaking OSM-community there is a discussion on the scheme for tagging landscapes (woodlands, shrubs, etc.). Much can change. Writing proposal still premature.
12017-03-10 09:23:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded almost 100 nodes with a spelling mistake: 'toilest' instead of 'toilets' - could you have a look an fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-10 09:22:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:21:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:20:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:20:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:19:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:19:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-09 08:57:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
this node doesn't seem to be tagged right. Could you putsome common tags there?

Jan
12017-03-08 08:58:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
There are several ways with a lot of strange tags here, like 'gdforderen'. Could you check and fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-03-08 10:57:18 UTCLogicalViolinist Do you have a way id? I might have missed deleting the garbage from geobase/toporama if not I can try to look for it
32017-03-08 12:42:52 UTCLogicalViolinist Think I found it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478904955
I'll fix it up
42017-03-08 14:06:15 UTCmueschel Here is a link to overpass turbo:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nlu
3 ways left.

Thanks for taking care!
Jan
52017-03-08 14:43:59 UTCLogicalViolinist shouldn't be any left, thanks for the heads up :)
12017-03-07 13:17:03 UTCmueschel Hallo,
Ich habe hier öfters das Tag "parking:conditions" gefunden - das gibt es sonst nirgends. Du meinst sicher "access=...". Schaust du da nochmal drüber?

Gruß, Jan
22017-03-07 14:55:21 UTCKeineHeimat Hallo,
ich habe das feature hier gelesen: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking:lane#Definieren_der_Parkplatznutzung

Gruß,
Jan
32017-03-07 15:15:54 UTCmueschel Dieses Tag wird für Parkstreifen entlang von Straßen verwendet, nicht für Parkplätze. Mir ist es deswegen aufgefallen, weil du "conditions" mit "s" schriebst.
42017-03-07 19:15:22 UTCKeineHeimat Upps, ändere ich die Tage - bin im Moment unterwegs!

Gruß
Jan
12017-03-07 09:23:15 UTCmueschel Please don't change the established wikipedia tag to things like
described-in-wikipedia
described_in_wikipedia
listed_in_wikipedia
listed-in-wikipedia
and so on. Such changes have to be discussed first.

Jan
22017-03-07 14:20:17 UTCnyuriks Hi, you are right that they need to be more organized. I made a proposal for it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikipedia_tag_types

Also, thanks to wikidata, we can clean up wikipedia tags now (almost 2,000 already done):
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Yurik/OSM_wiki_t...
12016-08-19 12:51:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
der Key "healthcare_speciality" gibt es sonst nicht, das sollte "health_specialty:XYZ" heißen. Siehe
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/health_specialty#similar

Gruß, Jan
22016-08-19 17:43:57 UTCFischkopp0815 Danke, ich habe es korrigiert
32017-03-05 19:08:06 UTChighflyer74 Moin Ihr zwei!

Genau genommen muß es nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare getaggt werden. Also healthcare:speciality=*

Gruss aus HB!
42017-03-05 19:18:47 UTCmueschel Das ist ein "konkurrierendes" Tagging Schema. Beide sind ähnlich oft in Verwendung (etwa 11000 zu 7000) und beide sind im Wiki dokumentiert (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0/Specialties ) U.a. erlaubt es eine feinere Abstufung und einfacheres Taggen...
52017-03-06 05:48:10 UTChighflyer74 Moin Jan! Ja, richtig. Ich erinnere mich gerade wieder, das wir das Thema beim Bremer Treffen erörtert hatten, uns dann aber für das andere entschieden haben, da das von Dir angesprochene nie über den Proposal Status hinauskam. Eigentlich eine unhaltbare Situation für ein nicht g...
12017-02-26 12:44:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
you imported a lot of points with elevation data in this changeset.
Please note that the tagging is wrong and because of that these points can not be used in OSM. Elevations are tagged using the 'ele' key. Sources should be given in the changeset source tag, but not individually on each of th...
22017-02-26 15:12:54 UTCptal_io Thank you for the comment. I have removed the erroneous tags and added ele tags as well as source information to the changeset commit.
32017-03-05 15:48:21 UTCmueschel All the wrong tags are still there and have not been deleted.
42017-03-05 17:20:18 UTCptal_io Apologies. This has been rectified in changeset 46600439
12017-03-05 15:43:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
you essentially flooded a huge area by adding landuse=basin to large polygons. Also, most of the tags are from a foreign source and do not belong into the OSM database:
NUNIVOTTO6=843131
NUNIVOTTO7=8431311
Shape_Area=2.42385595961E8
Shape_Leng=79016.1029871
surface=2423...
12017-03-05 15:34:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please pay a bit of attention to the spelling of keys - I found various versions of the word "wheelchair" in your edits. With spelling mistakes these tags can not be understood by any software.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-05 13:31:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
17 of the nodes have the strange key "|ODS:nevenadres" - could you check that? Pipes in keys are not common.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-05 18:01:37 UTCde vries Yes I know, I'll fix it. I postponed fixing it for debug reasons .
12017-03-05 12:50:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag on this way - was it a mistake?
Cheers, Jan

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477789206
22017-03-05 12:55:27 UTCFvGordon Please ask the creator of version 1.
Greetings, Franz
32017-03-05 13:15:41 UTCmueschel Sorry, I didn't see this changeset - but thanks to his changeset comment it is clear it should be 'source'.
12016-10-05 07:52:28 UTCAthalis Hallo greecemapper,

woher stammen denn die ganzen name Tags? Sicherlich nicht von Bing ;) Kannst du noch eine Quelle angeben (hier im Changeset Kommentar sollte reichen) damit das in Zukunft noch nachvollziehbar ist?
22017-03-05 12:44:19 UTCmueschel Sieht für mich so aus als sollten zumindest die Flurnamen revertiert werden solange die Legalität der Quelle nicht klar ist.
12017-03-03 20:50:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key 'Q' quite often in this changeset, what is it supposed to mean? Could you check and correct this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-04 14:25:12 UTCMr BA Demba corrigé
12017-03-03 20:44:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
Here are five ways with the tag "tt=both" - could you correct this?

Jan
22017-03-03 22:22:56 UTCMeredith Rider Thanks for catching that. I'll get it fixed!
Meredith
12017-03-02 11:49:32 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du diesen Node checken? "Düne = Düne" ist kein sinnvoll definiertes Tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4707353849

Gruß, Jan
12017-03-02 11:47:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this house?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287233238
The street name looks wrong and there is another tag that looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-02 12:23:09 UTCThunder08 Thank you! I fixed it.
12017-03-02 11:45:18 UTCmueschel Hallo modea,
willkommen bei OSM!
Du hast hier Hydranten eingetragen. Überlicherweise werden solche Objekte nur als Punkt und nicht als Linie eingetragen. Das Tag "hydrant=yes" wird leider von keiner Software verstanden. Schau mal im Wiki nach, dort ist erklärt wie Hydranten get...
22017-03-04 08:59:50 UTCanesthesia Halo modea,
du hast Gebäude doppelt (zb Hausnummer 33, 77 und 78) sowie Linien (ways) und Punkte (Nodes) ohne Tags erfasst.
Die Kapelle ist nun 3x vorhanden: einmal von mir; einmal von dir mit Tag und einmal ohne.

Güße,

32017-03-04 09:06:04 UTCanesthesia PS: du verwendest eine Uuuuuralte JOSM Version. die ist schon sechs Jahre alt. Eine aktuelle Version gibt es hier: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Download
12017-03-02 11:40:04 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du diesen Hydranten nochmal überprüfen? "fire_pressure" ist kein sinnvolles Tag. Außerdem werden Kommazahlen wie im Englischen mit Punkt geschrieben.
Gruß, Jan
22017-03-02 13:40:12 UTCkphklaus doofer Fehler, habe ich korrigiert.
viele Grüße
kph
12017-03-02 11:36:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this edit? You added a bus route that consists of a parking lot only.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7013865

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-02 11:33:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this area? Looks like something went wrong with the name tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317391337

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-02 13:37:05 UTCFredrikLindseth Ah, a typo. I fixed it now :-)
12017-03-02 11:31:56 UTCmueschel Hallo,
der Key "recycling:opening_hours" wird außer hier nirgends verwendet. Üblicherweise wird "opening_hours" ohne Prefix verwendet. Würdest du das anpassen?

Gruß, Jan
22017-03-02 12:10:19 UTCbezin Hi, ja, völlig richtig. Da hab ich gepennt. Passe ich an – auch für die Änderungen in Überruhr-Holthausen.
32017-03-03 08:31:52 UTCbezin Gilt entsprechend auch für recycling:operator, der so nicht existiert, sondern auch ohne Prefix verwendet wird. Auch das passe ich an.
12017-03-01 11:30:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the spelling of keys in your latest changesets? E.g. I saw
water tank :housenumber
water tank: housenumber
water tank:street

There should be no spaces in the key and 'water_tank' has an underscore.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-01 11:26:54 UTCmueschel HI,
could you check the tagging of some of these objects? They have russian keys only and no common keys used in other places in OSM.
Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476958046

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-03 01:02:50 UTCJake Strine Yes, it's a mistake. Fixed.
12017-03-01 11:24:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Tagging schauen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4701196968
Da steht " 7710052 = underground"

Gruss, Jan
22017-03-01 12:08:47 UTCmentor2002 Sorry,
danke für den Hinweis... das hat sich der Copy - Paste Fehlerteufel eingeschlichen.
12017-02-28 15:13:35 UTCmuralito Would'nt it be better to use tag "rooms" instead of "number_of_apartments"?
22017-02-28 15:20:24 UTCmueschel I just corrected the obvious spelling mistake in the key.
'number_of_apartments' is already used 1800 times, so I consider it a valid tag. I don't know if there are cases where someone distinguished between number of rooms and number of apartments on a single object.
12017-02-28 11:57:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
if you want to tag names in foreign languages: The language has to be given as ISO-639 code, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cree_language has the code 'cr' and Innu has 'moe'.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-28 11:50:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. Most of the tags you put on this node are rather useless, because they don't follow established tagging styles. Please have a look to the Wiki, e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features. There is a list of common tags.

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-28 15:10:59 UTCmuralito And/Or maybe ask for help to the Iocal community.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India
12017-02-28 11:47:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2699648841
It has two contradicting tacticle_paving tags.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-28 11:41:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
I would like to point you to this Wiki page that describes how charging stations for electric cars can be tagged:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
Cheers, Jan
12017-01-20 11:42:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many foreign tags on 133 roads in your changesets, like these:
Cod_via=20478
Cod_viaOld=0
DUG=VIA
Etichetta=VIA PEZZALUNGA
ISTAT=63001.0
Lunghezza=130.94
Toponimo=PEZZALUNGA
Tratto=15
f_node=1346

They all look like they do not belong into the OSM database and were added by m...
22017-02-27 20:13:39 UTCmueschel I think that this changeset has to be reverted - we can not make sure that the license of this data is compatible with ODbL if you don't disclose your source.
12017-02-27 11:52:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of the tag "hiter=ter" you put on several ways here?

Jan
22017-02-27 12:44:47 UTCff5722 That should be highway=tertiary
I sometimes make typos and JOSM keeps suggesting those until restart. I will correct it asap.
12017-02-27 11:50:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
you managed to get three spelling mistakes in this turn restriction: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6997873

Actually, you don't need this relation, it is better to add access tags to the short service way. E.g. access=emergency.
12017-02-27 11:48:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way got two distance tags, one is misspelled. Could you check which one is right?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3115311666

If there are two values given, you can add them to the same tag, separated by ';'

Jan
12017-02-27 11:46:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
all the objects have the tag "Horta = Vella" - was this a mistake?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-27 21:57:21 UTCpacopac Corrected! Was a mistake. Thanks for pay attention
12017-02-27 11:44:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used highway=project here - this tag is not used often. There are other values that are defined in the wiki, maybe you can change the tagging to one of these?
planned
proposed
preproposed
construction

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-27 13:27:43 UTCbibi6 Hi, I'm going to change these to "planned". Thanks ;)
32017-02-27 13:34:49 UTCbibi6 ... I actually decided to use "proposed", as the way may change - but it will probably not. Wait and see ^^
12017-02-26 13:08:47 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du hier nach dem Namen schauen? Da scheint etwas beim Tagging schiefgegangen zu sein.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38805790

Gruß, Jan
22017-02-26 17:21:45 UTCOF0 Ja, da war was schiefgegangen. Muss
name=Schönertsee
heißen. Habe es korrigiert.

Danke für den Hinweis.
12017-02-25 12:38:15 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check this way?
http://osm.org/way/30833729
Something went wrong with the name tag.
Cheers, Jan
12017-02-23 11:35:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the keys railway:date_start and :date_end. The usual key for this is railway:start_date and :end_date.
Could you have a look and correct this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-02-26 16:20:44 UTCsfrank Hi,
I fixed it. Was accidently used, because first I used date:start and date:end.
Frank
12017-02-23 11:23:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 62 buildings have a spelling mistake in the tags: 'add:province' instead of 'addr:province'. Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-24 15:26:08 UTCgiorosel Hi jan,
thanks for checking, i've already fixed it
12017-02-23 09:46:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
this changeset generated a lot of objects with a huge number of tags that are not documented and seem to have been added by mistake during this import.

Jan
22017-02-23 09:57:41 UTCBgabor Hi,
All 4000 points a certain water sources in the area and all attached attribute is important.
32017-02-23 10:02:50 UTCmueschel If this information is important, I suggest to use common tags that can be parsed by existing software.
Btw, I don't see a connection to hotosm project 2525 you mention in the changeset comment. Has this import of data been discussed on the appropriate mailing list? Is this data really 'open'? The...
42017-02-26 19:48:11 UTCedvac Hi:
If this is an import and haven't been discussed, it should be reverted inmediatly.
Imports have to be discussed with the local community and with the imports list, and should be documented and the source compatible with the ODbL.
52017-02-28 15:03:58 UTCmuralito No doubt it is an import. It should be reverted, or at least discussed, fixed and the resulting new tags documented.

62017-03-03 01:14:37 UTCedvac This import has been reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46535966
Please, read and follow the imports guidelines (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) before doing any import. Imports have to be documented, been given ODbL compatible permission by the copyright owners...
72017-03-07 23:31:18 UTCSomeoneElse Hello Bgabor,
Just to echo what has been said above - if you want to import data please do read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and follow the links from it.
If you've got any questions you can either mail the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org or ask on the "imports"...
82017-03-08 10:29:54 UTCBgabor Hi,

I will send a letter for the National Bureau of Statistics to Tanzania, and ask them to clarify the licenses for all data from http://opendata.go.tz/ website.

PS: thank you for your efforts...

Gabor
92017-03-08 12:05:29 UTCmuralito Hello Bgabor:

If the terms & conditions are the same as stated in http://opendata.go.tz/en/pages/kanuni-na-masharti , I'm not sure if the d) paragraph is compatible with ODbL.

Maybe in this case we need explicit permission from the owner to import their data into OSM.
102017-03-08 12:39:44 UTCSomeoneElse @Bgabor,
I'd suggest having this discussion on the "imports" list - there people will be able to advise you about licenses.
See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-February/004819.html for where this import was first mentioned there.
Best Regards,
Andy
12017-02-22 11:24:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this fire station? There seems to be some typing error I can't fix.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-21 12:15:15 UTCmueschel http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475067209
parking:lane:right:vertical = yes

Wirklich vertikal?
22017-02-22 11:29:32 UTCsoemisch Mueschel,

danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe den Datensatz in "perpendicular" korrigiert.

Viele Grüße, Lars
12017-02-21 10:15:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several buildings on top of already existing ones. Could you have a look and correct these mistakes?
Additionally, all tags you added have no meaning in OSM - only well-defined tags as described in the Wiki can be used. Examples:
Capacity \t=80
Condition \t=average
Levels \t=1
Pu...
12017-02-18 18:04:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
from this changeset there are still hundreds or thousand untagged and unconnected nodes in the database. As they are completely useless - could you take some time to clean this up?
Let me / the community now if you have trouble or need help!

Jan
22017-02-20 13:41:05 UTCIvan Garcia Could you send me the link of some ofthe unconnected nodes? I will take a look at it.
thks for the alert.
32017-02-20 13:50:27 UTCmueschel Here is a link to Keepright tool - this link just shows this type of unconnected node - you have to move the map to see more errors, only ~300 are shown at a time. Actually, they seem to be from different changesets, but all by 'importer2015'.

http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/keepright/report_map.php?z...
42017-02-20 14:07:36 UTCIvan Garcia You are right. I will have time from next week to remove those.
52017-03-04 22:34:45 UTCIvan Garcia All orphan nodes cleaned.
12017-02-19 09:33:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

In your edits I saw some keys that contain non-english keys. All keys should be in English only and use the well-defined names described in the wiki.
Here is a list of these objects - could you have a look and correct them?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/mPE
Let me know if you...
12017-02-19 08:56:11 UTCmueschel Hi
welcome to OSM. You put many tags on the objects you added - but unfortunately they can't be used by any OSM based software. Most of the keys you used are not well-defined and are not understood by other users. Please have a look at the wiki to find out how e.g. buildings are commonly tagged.
\...
12017-02-18 18:08:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you un-deleted a large number of nodes in this changeset, like
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3509954079/history
These nodes seem to be useless now. Could you have a look and remove them again? Let me / the community know if you need help!

Jan
12017-01-09 10:04:57 UTCmueschel Hallo,
no exit schreibt sich no_exit.

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-14 08:05:10 UTCmtbbiker99 Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis.

Geht so auch: noexit ?
Gruß Oliver.
32017-02-17 12:12:47 UTCmueschel Ja natürlich. noexit ist korrekt, ich weiß gar nicht mehr warum sich da ein _ in meinen Kommentar eingeschlichen hat.
Sorry für die späte Antwort, habe ich übersehen!
12017-02-17 12:11:18 UTCmueschel Kannst du hier mal drüberschauen? An vielen Objekten hängt jetzt eine Mailadresse als Tag (teilweise mehrfach)

Gruß, Jan
12017-02-17 11:58:48 UTCmueschel You (again) added many useless tags on buildings, e.g. here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363504576
You removed the valid tags and put new ones. All of these are useless for OSM because they don't follow normal tagging rules.

Jan
12017-02-16 21:29:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of your edits? In OSM, the Keys must be well defined, like "name=". For example you wrote
زمین والیبالname=زمین والیبال روستا
this should be:
name=زمین والیبال روستا
And several other, similar ones. Could you f...
12017-02-16 21:26:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the key "bycycle" 20 times in these edits. Could you fix the spelling - "bicycle"?
Cheers, Jan
12017-02-16 21:09:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
this node has the tag "Stupava = Svätý Jur" which looks like a mistake. Could you check that?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/530544357
Jan
22017-02-17 08:26:48 UTCwmyrda Hi,
It is indeed. Not sure what I meant there, but probably just a copy&paste error when I wanted to add "name:pl=Svätý Jur" just like the name in polish Wikipedia is. I'll fix that one to it.
12017-02-16 21:08:09 UTCmueschel Hallo,
schau mal nach dieser Plattform, da hat das Tagging Tippfehler:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261111877

Gruss, Jan
22017-02-16 21:12:00 UTCWeltstaat allerdings!
Danke, habs ausgebessert.
Grüsse, Jonathan
12017-02-16 21:02:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier hast du den Key "Dorfkirche" verwendet - sollte das ein name-Tag werden?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326815203
12017-02-16 21:02:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier hast du den Key "Dorfkirche" verwendet - sollte das ein name-Tag werden?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326815203
12017-02-16 21:01:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
am Node 73580256 hängt ein komisches Tag:
Burgkapelle = Burgwiese

Gruß, Jan
22017-02-16 21:29:27 UTCNetzwolf Copy+Paste & v(Finger)>v(Hirn) → Unfug
Ist getilgt. Danke für den Hinweis.

Mehr Spaß mit Attributen gibt's täglich frisch hier:
http://geo.netzwolf.info/csv/bad_attributes_k_eq_v.csv.bz2
http://geo.netzwolf.info/csv/bad_attributes_k_norm.csv.bz2
http://geo.netzwolf...
12017-02-16 12:49:21 UTCmueschel Could you check the tagging? "Gegevens =Binnenwegplein" looks like a mistake.
Jan
12017-02-16 12:39:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
this node got the key "no_end". Did you mean no_exit?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4682479131
Cheers, Jan
12017-02-16 11:49:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many buildings with the tag "building=yes=house" - could you fix that? "building = house" would be correct.

Jan
12017-02-15 08:47:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded some buildings with a missing building=yes tag. Also, there are some with two building:levels tags, one is misspelled. Could you have a look and fix these issues?

Jan
12017-02-14 21:30:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of tags, e.g. "destinarion = Ponta Grossa, Retorno"
I found several times a spelling mistake in 'destination' or ':lanes' - I corrected them where I found them.
Secondly, the normal separator between destinations is a ';', not a comma.

Ch...
12017-02-14 21:02:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found keys like "destination:lanes:ref" in your edits. The correct order is "destination:ref:lanes" - :lanes comes at the end. I fixed that for you.

Here is a generic string to show the order for all those suffixes:
key[:subkey][:hgv|:bicycle|...][:lanes][:forward|:bac...
22017-02-16 12:23:38 UTCmweper Oops. Thanks for notifying me and fix it. I did not realize.
12017-02-14 19:00:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
you tagged 90 buildings with "building:levell=1" - could you correct the spelling mistake ('levels' instead of 'levell' )?

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-14 18:59:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
you tagged 20 buildings with "building;material=cement_block" - could you correct the spelling mistake (';' instead of ':' )?

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-14 18:56:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "AlYf=Recordings" on many nodes. This tag is not used in any other place. I don't know what it means. Could you check if there is another way to tag this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-21 16:29:11 UTCshirasayu Corrected
12017-02-13 11:42:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "tire=yes" on this building:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370563749
It looks like spelling mistake, could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-13 19:09:22 UTCalexhyd18 Hello. Thanks for attention.
If it looks like mistake, then what I must write to indicate the presence of tire correctly?
32017-02-13 19:12:52 UTCmueschel Can you describe what it is? A shop where you can buy tires? That would be shop = tyres
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtyres
42017-02-13 19:17:51 UTCalexhyd18 It's a place where where anyone can make a mountage of tires
52017-02-13 19:32:59 UTCmueschel Ok, now I got it. I would tag it as:

shop = car_repair (Even if it is not a shop - to give the category of the object)
service = tyres
self_service = yes
fee = no / yes
description = (describe it in your own words, Russian is fine)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dcar
12017-02-13 11:48:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this object?
http://osm.org/way/473866994
The tag doesn't look right:
Mahall Türkerler=government
12017-02-13 11:38:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put a non-standard tag in Russian language on this node. Unfortunately this doesn't help OSM, because software can only understand well-defined tags. Could you have a look to the OSM wiki to find a better suited tag for this? man_made=pier could be one of them.
22017-02-14 14:47:14 UTCPavel_TCH Thank you for your note
12017-02-13 11:32:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You put the tag "clinica = yes" on this building:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402795000

Unfortunately, this is not really useful, because the tag is not well-defined and no software can understand it. Please have a look to the wiki how hospitals need to be ma...
12017-02-12 13:47:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier nochmal nach dem Kreisel schauen? Der ist irgendwie zweispurig getaggt. Und ist das wirklich so gedacht, dass die Straße im Norden nicht angeschlossen ist?
http://osm.org/way/321022076

Gruß, Jan
22017-02-12 21:44:18 UTChca Hej!
Die lanes waren ein Überbleibsel des früheren Straßenverlaufs (vor dem Bau des Kreisels), das ich vergessen hatte. Habe ich entfernt -- danke für den Hinweis!
Was mit der Straße im Norden -- Hünfelder Straße -- werden soll, weiß ich auch nicht. Als...
12017-02-12 13:10:40 UTCmueschel "Privatweg", "Seltsame Kirr-Konstruktion", "Jagdfläche"... das sind alles keine Namen von Objekten.
12017-02-11 12:33:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "destination:tag" that is not used in any other place. Could you explain the meaning or find another common tag?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-13 09:35:12 UTCinah_telenav Hi
Sorry I missed understood, I was suppose to put destination:street.
I uploaded the reviewed version.
12017-02-11 12:27:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
You created many objects without any tag describing what it is. Could you review these changes and add tags like those described in the Wiki?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-11 12:25:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
You created many objects without any tag describing what it is. Could you review these changes and add tags like those described in the Wiki?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-10 11:52:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many POIs with tags like these:
Categoria=B
Denominaci=peluqueria manicura spa
Nombre=STAR COIFFURE
Numero=3
Tipo=CYS

These are rather useless because the tagging does not follow the established schemes. They can't appear on any map unless you use normal tags...
12017-02-09 12:08:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
please trace buildings a bit more carefully - there are no buildings here of the size and shape you draw them. Most of the actual buildings were already mapped by others. I reverted your changeset to clean this up.
Jan
12017-02-09 11:51:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this relation? The tag "tt = no" looks like a mistake.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/969201

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-09 12:11:24 UTCPetr1868 opraveno
12017-02-09 11:45:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "crown_type: = I" on ~13 trees. Could you correct this mistake (there is no ':' in the key?
22017-02-09 12:54:52 UTCLucFreitas Thanks. Fixed in changeset 45946425.
12017-02-08 15:13:28 UTCrskedgell I can find a reference for xxx:inscription_date=* in the wiki, when used in combination with heritage=* and heritage_operator=xxx, where xxx is the abbreviation for the operator, in this case he for Historic England - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage#Tags_to_use_in_combination
...
22017-02-08 15:31:07 UTCmueschel Oh, you're right.
To me this looked like the typical mistake when autocompletion failed. On the same POIs you used heritage:* as well, so this made it rather plausible. "heritage:operator" and "heritage:inscription_date" formed a nice group of tags and made a lot of sense.

I...
32017-02-08 19:48:13 UTCmueschel Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45928032
12017-02-08 12:01:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
in the last weeks I found this tag rather often:
he:inscription_date
I think it should be
heritage:inscription_date

Could it be a copy and paste problem?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-08 15:31:48 UTCrskedgell The "Tags to use in combination" table in the wiki article for the key heritage at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage#Tags_to_use_in_combination has:
heritage:operator=*\txxx\tsee table under abbreviation
and
xxx:inscription_date=*\t\tDate when the object was added to the ...
32017-02-08 15:32:34 UTCmueschel For the records:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45431514

he:inscription_date is correct.
42017-02-08 15:52:36 UTCrskedgell Thanks - it's perhaps not the most obvious tagging scheme and probably did look a lot like a typo.
12017-02-08 11:39:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "Village tract" on many objects - this is not a defined tag in OSM. What is its purpose?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-08 12:32:26 UTCОлег Самуйлов Hi,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Village_tract
Cheers
32017-02-08 14:55:47 UTCmueschel Ah, I see.
The key you used doesn't fit well into the usual tagging schemes.
What is used quite often are keys like
is_in:township or
is_in:ward

I didn't find some established tagging of village tracts right now. So, I would suggest for your purpose:
is_in:tract or
is_in:villagetract
...
12017-02-08 12:06:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
please update your maps.me app. Yours has a bug and adds a wrong tag:
"banner_url = https://is.gd/UoIIyn"
12017-02-08 11:56:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag recycling:Emballages =yes - tags should always be in English. An often used key is
recycling:plastic_packaging
Does it fit?

Jan
12017-02-07 22:56:02 UTCFortepc There was no reason to remove those tags. They were accurate information relevant to the POIs they were attached to.
22017-02-08 11:49:11 UTCmueschel see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45848069
OSM is not a map of non-existing graphics in some game.
32017-02-08 17:27:39 UTCFortepc I was not mapping ingame graphics. I was tagging real world objects referencing that they also exist in the ARG. It's just as relevant as referencing their facebook pages that you didn't remove.
12017-02-06 11:35:47 UTCmueschel Please stop adding ingress and pokemon features. OSM does not contain such ficitional objects.
22017-02-07 22:52:17 UTCFortepc @Mueschel you're suggesting OSM doesn't contain Freedom Park? you're sorely mistaken. Sorry for the confusion but my changeset updated the accuracy of the park on the ground, as well as added relevant information in the tags.

Thanks for your concern, but try again next time with that high horse ...
32017-02-08 11:42:34 UTCmueschel Is Freedom Park fictional? Can I see it when walking there? So yes, it should be in OSM. Can I see Pokemons when I walk there? No, they are just existing in a software on your mobile phone.

Thanks for not insulting other mappers.
42017-02-08 17:27:04 UTCFortepc I was not mapping "Pokemons" I was tagging the park as also being represented in the Augmented Space, the same as you'd tag the park's website or social pages, or any of the many tags on this part that are a non-physical fact about the park.
52017-02-08 17:30:03 UTCFortepc Look at my edit history, I'm not some token kid trying to vandalize the map. I care about accuracy. I'm seeking to use my local knowledge to map with the greatest accuracy possible. With as much information about the POIs as possible.
62017-02-08 18:29:34 UTCNakaner Hi Fortepc,

adding arg:ingress=portalfarm, arg:pokemongo=pokestopfarm and arg:pokemongo_1=nest does not meet our guidelines about verifiability (also known as the "On The Ground Rule"). Please only add information to OpenStreetMap which everyone can VERIFY ON THE GROUND.

https://wiki...
72017-02-08 18:30:46 UTCNakaner PS Freedom Park has a very strange tagging with dozens of uppercase keys which also is against our rules but that does not make your edits better. The edit which added those uppercase keys might be treated the same way as you.
82017-02-09 17:19:12 UTCFortepc @Nakaner, Yes. I am very familiar with the OSM's on the ground rule. But rule is for mapping things, not adding information to the tags of things. And I am also following all of the rules present on the Pokemon Go blogpost you referred to. I'm improving accuracy of what is on the ground, as well as ...
12017-02-08 11:38:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "Building features=building" on 207 buildings - this is not a defined tag in OSM. What is its purpose?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-08 14:39:52 UTCBgabor Well, seems by mistake - mixed the tag what was used in ID.
12017-02-07 12:25:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't add junction=roundabout to circular streets without knowing the situation on ground. E.g. this one is no roundabout (as described in the german note on it)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25444119

Also, all your tags have a spelling mistake 'jonction' instead of 'junction'
12017-02-07 11:51:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are ~15 ways with a spelling mistake "shouder" instead of "shoulder". Could you have a look?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-07 13:02:57 UTCkre3d Oops. Should be better now. Thanks for pointing it out!
12017-02-05 21:58:44 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier vor einiger Zeit Relationen angelegt, denen das type-Tag fehlt. Kannst du das noch ergänzen?
Gruß, Jan

z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4139718
22017-02-06 08:44:39 UTCNakaner Hallo Jan,

in meinen Augen (als Eisenbahnmapper) sind die Inhalte dieser Relation nicht vor Ort überprüfbar und genügen daher nicht den Anforderungen, die an Objekte gestellt werden, die in OSM eingetragen werden. Mit "Lupe Neuostheim" ist höchstwahrscheinlich eine D...
12017-02-05 21:44:05 UTCmueschel Wurde hier die Ampel tatsächlich wieder abgebaut?
http://osm.org/node/339513244
Vor ein paar Monaten war sie noch da.
12017-02-05 21:30:31 UTCmueschel Hallo Michael,
ist zwar schon lange her, aber: Was befindet sich eigentlich an den "Planeten-"Knoten? Nur ein Name ist so nichtssagend. Eine Informationstafel oder so? Dann könnte man das entsprechend taggen.
Gruß, Jan
12017-02-05 21:28:00 UTCmueschel Hallo,
vorher stammen diese Namen? Informationen aus anderen Karten dürfen in der Regel nicht verwendet werden (Lizenzen!)

Außerdem stimmt das Tagging so nicht: Ein Knoten nur mit einem "name"-Tag beschreibt nicht, um was es sich handelt.

Gruß, Jan
12017-02-05 14:19:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
why did you remove all the good tags again and re-added many tags that don't seem to belong to OSM?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-05 18:29:22 UTCaiwetir The border on the portion of the Winema National Forest in this region http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?#map=16/43.0869/-121.8861 appears to be backwards, it shows landuse forest on the basemap but when editing, the border is on the land around the forest. I reverted to make sure it wasn't somethi...
32017-02-05 18:33:56 UTCmueschel JOSM shows the marker on the wrong side, because there is no way to decide which is the right one by looking at one outer way only. As soon as you download the whole multi-polygon, it switches to the correct side.
There is no "backwards" with respect to the direction of outer ways of mult...
42017-02-05 18:40:08 UTCaiwetir I saw that just now in JOSM, I was obviously editing on the web application. When you look at it on the web application it indeed looks backwards whether there is a backwards or not.
52017-02-05 19:04:39 UTCmueschel The problem is the same for both editors, they just can't decide what is inner and outer without loading the full relation - in case of iD I don't know if this is even possible. When handling huge multi-polygons like this, JOSM is a much better choice. E.g. because you can selectively load the fores...
62017-02-05 19:40:16 UTCaiwetir I could use help, changing all the tags is easy enough but I just took a closer look at the overlapping areas and it's pretty complex. First, large areas of the Gilchrist and Deschutes overlap, then the borders should probably be fixed up so the nodes align to ways or other nodes (that's easy enoug...
72017-02-05 20:25:59 UTCaiwetir As it turns out, much has changed in that region since a land purchase just a few years ago. I'm going to delete the Gilchrist and start anew with new shapefiles.
12017-02-05 14:15:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node? Looks like something went wrong with copy and paste.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-05 12:57:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tagging of this node doesn't seem right.
It is now a sports center, a group home, a foundation and a locality in the same place.
Could you correct this?
Jan
12017-02-04 15:32:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 45 villages with some strange tags, was this a mistake?
E.g.
CODE94X=903035
GLOBAL=0
PRIORITY=NONE
VILLAGE_ID=5826
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4227632087

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-04 15:39:01 UTCkatpatuka hopefully not ;)

The names are from the 11000 villages file mentioned on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Laos/RoadsRiversBoundaries
32017-02-04 15:41:12 UTCmueschel I didn't mean adding the villages, just these tags. They don't look like they belong to OSM and are not used in other places.
42017-02-04 16:52:19 UTCkatpatuka well yes - they are in the original file and I left them as is - comparable to other for osm useless tags like gns:dsg etc. originating from imports
12017-02-04 15:28:44 UTCmueschel Hallo,
hier sind 8 Wege ohne Tags entstanden, kannst du da nochmal nachschauen? z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/385145640

Gruß, Jan
12017-02-04 15:02:17 UTCmueschel Hallo,
hier ist etwas schiefgegangen, die Wege habe alle keinerlei Tags. Kannst du da nochmal drüberschauen?

Gruß, Jan
12017-02-04 12:29:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these two buildings? There is a strange tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114516260
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306543826

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-06 18:31:36 UTCnhdr Oops sorry, it was my mistake. I fixed it already. Thank you)
12017-02-03 13:21:15 UTCmueschel http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29110888
maxspeed 80 oder 90? Da ist ein tag zu viel.

Gruß, Jan
22017-02-03 17:14:23 UTCLinie29 Danke für den Hinweis! Habe auf den richtigen "maxspeed:backward"-Tag korrigiert.
12017-02-03 12:00:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many ways with "Highway" or "Higway" tags - could you correct these? Only 'highway' is a valid key.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-03 11:48:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
can you check the tagging of this way? Looks strange...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470722745

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-31 11:34:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
it's nice to see that you put a lot of effort in mapping destinations. Unfortunately, there is nobody who can use this data, because your tagging style is not documented and used only by you. Why don't you join the common tagging scheme which is successfully used thousands of times all over the...
22017-01-31 18:36:29 UTCyopaseopor The System and the whole scheme is not ready to put it in the wiki so work is in progress. I am mapping complete traffic signs (not only destination traffic signs), but also destinations (which has a clearer scheme) so the actual scheme is getting too little and simple. Traffic signs are being rende...
32017-01-31 18:52:07 UTCmueschel All the tags listed in this project are well-described in the wiki.

Take the node from this changeset as example: I have absolutely no clue why there is a need to list a single destination 15 times on a simple two-lane road like this.
I strongly suggest to ask the communicty for comments before ...
42017-01-31 23:45:32 UTCyopaseopor Ok you win. Please read this. Good night. http://yopaseopor.blogspot.com.es/2017/01/yomapeo-ok-you-win.html
52017-02-03 11:42:01 UTCmueschel "Then hell break loose" - Just because people remind you on the way things should be done in OSM? Have fun putting tags on nodes - nobody will be able to make any use of them as long as you don't write documentation for it.
62017-02-03 19:06:00 UTCyopaseopor Thank you for your help :S
72017-02-05 18:14:57 UTCyopaseopor https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_traffic_signs_tagging
12017-01-17 11:48:12 UTCmueschel Could you please stop adding your personal fantasy about tagging again and again and stop vandalizing OSM data?
22017-01-17 21:43:55 UTCtrial +1, please at least describe what you want to do. Except BS I mean.
32017-02-02 16:59:13 UTCStereo Of course it's partly meant as a joke. At the SotM EU, we came across this strange box, and decided to dedicate it as a monument to RichardF. The RichardF box does exist, and the physical properties are all correct. Someone even slapped a "Surveyed by OSM" sticker on it.

It is an exampl...
42017-02-02 18:12:20 UTCmueschel And this "joke" now renders on every map as a huge pile of Unicode garbage, gives errors because of incorrect units in the height tag and service_times that don't follow the documented tagging rules.
52017-02-02 19:38:24 UTCtrial Not on every map, http://b.tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=20&lat=49.0107&lon=8.38717&layers=B0000000FFFFFF renders it properly. Both renderers are based on the same stack.
But please move your tests to http://www.opengeofiction.net/#map=5/51.500/-0.100 and add the link or the Wiki so that ...
62017-02-02 19:50:58 UTCmueschel The name:fr tag, which is rendered by openstreetmap.fr doesn't contain the Unicode stuff. The default osm.org map shows the Unicode properly, too. But tag is just a collection of Unicode weirdness without any meaning.
72017-02-02 20:03:12 UTCtrial Right. Time to cleanup!
12017-02-02 11:28:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this road?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46039701

The name tag is somehow strange.
22017-02-02 14:33:38 UTCgezginrocker I've corrected it, thanks for your attention.
12017-02-02 07:52:19 UTCeric_ Whitehouse Terrace being part of the north side of Grange Loan, I changed it into name:left as it was originally (i.e. before a contributor changed it into name:South Side). Thanks anyway to have spotted this error.
22017-02-02 09:19:48 UTCmueschel Thanks! I'm sorry for the mistake but I forgot to check the history of the way...
32017-02-21 19:16:18 UTCeric_ No problem (sorry to answer so late).
12017-01-31 12:04:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
there is no need to translate tags like "tourism:fr = chambres d'hôte" - The translation is the same for all tourism = guest_house tags world-wide and can be done automatically by the software showing the data.

Jan
22017-02-01 11:10:02 UTCphilh-591 Thank you for your comment. I'll remove the unnecessary tag.

However, I'll carry on tagging specifically bakers' shops in France as
shop:fr = boulanger, patissier
or
shop:fr = pain, patissier
according to whether the shop displays "Boulanger" or "Pain". This i...
32017-02-01 11:46:17 UTCmueschel Sure, if it provides additional information, an additional tag makes sense.

As you describe a sub-group of bakeries, I would opt for a tagging like this:
shop = bakery
bakery = boulanger
42017-02-04 14:33:33 UTCphilh-591 OK. Actually I'll find out if the French User Group have a recommended practice on tagging for bakeries. If not, I'll put forward the method
shop=bakery; bakery=boulanger
shop=bakery; bakery=dépôt de pain
52017-02-04 16:29:50 UTCtrial http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:shop%3Dbakery
mueschel advice is good. Prevent using multiple keys as long as possible.
So if needed; I would add:
produced_on_site = yes/no
craft=backery.
pastry=yes...
See [OSM-talk-fr]
12017-01-31 15:48:03 UTCmueschel Hallo,
das Tag "maxstay@Mi,Sa = 60" funktioniert so nicht, weil nicht per Software auswertbar.
Besser ist:
maxstay:conditional = 60 @ (We,Sa)
oder noch besser, mit Einschränkung auf den tatsächlichen Zeitraum, oder gilt das 24 Stunden?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-31 15:58:43 UTCKartoGrapHiti Vielen Dank. Ich hatte im Wiki nicht verstanden, wie man es einträgt. Jetzt habe ich versucht, es zu korrigieren: maxstay:conditional=60 @ (We,Sa 07:00-14:00)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45689146#map=19/50.58734/8.67796

Wenn das noch nicht ganz stimmt, bitte gerne korrigieren....
32017-01-31 16:02:12 UTCmueschel Passt. Zeitangaben lassen sich wie üblich hier testen:
http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=We%2CSa%2007%3A00-14%3A00&DATE=1485878400000&lat=48.7769&lon=9.1844&mode=0
12017-01-31 11:57:22 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was meinst du mit "chocker:right"?
Klingt für mich eher nach traffic_calming:forward.

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-31 14:54:42 UTCgeri-oc traffic_calming:*=chocker ist aber nicht im WIKI dokumentiert - deshalb hatte ich chocker=right als ergänzende Information zu gefügt. Ist für mich auch eine einfacher Auswertung, da ich nicht nach allen Varianten suchen muss. Es ist eine kleine Pflanzinsel im Fahrbahnbereich.
Bild un...
32017-01-31 15:13:12 UTCmueschel :forward/:backward und :left/:right sind bei den wenigsten Tags explizit dokumentiert, machen aber generell bei allen Straßeneigenschaften Sinn.

Ob bei einem choker dieser Art ein traffic_calming:right oder traffic_calming:forward besser ist, weiß ich aber auch nicht. Hängt meine...
42017-01-31 15:44:38 UTCgeri-oc Ich würde es so lassen, da es auch mehrfach verwendet wird:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/choker#values

PS: chocker in choker geändert - ist mir an zwei stellen aufgefallen
12017-01-31 12:06:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
found two ways with the tag 'roof:redge' - is this roof:edge or roof:ridge?

Jan
22017-01-31 16:21:00 UTCcarlosz22 Hi.
Ops, my mistake :)
Corrected. Thanks for the advice.
Carlos
12017-01-31 11:55:54 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du hier das Tagging prüfen? 80 = 100 ist ein merkwürdiges Tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469609025
22017-01-31 15:10:35 UTCAmiral Fromage Hallo,
ich werde im nächsten Änderungssatz den Tag entfernen, danke für den Hinweis!
Ebenso werde ich fehlende Langsamfahrsignale ergänzen.
12017-01-31 11:54:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4640145541

313 = 314 is a strange tag.

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-31 13:47:49 UTCBratananio Thanks for helping to correct this mistake.

I've just corrected it.
12017-01-31 11:43:02 UTCmueschel Hallo,
man_made:levels finde ich jetzt nicht so gelungen als neuen Tag - Stockwerke hat so eine Säule ja nicht.

Außerdem gibt es eher keinen Grund hier einen eigenen Namespace mit man_made: zu benutzen - auf was sollte sich height sonst beziehen?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-31 17:29:00 UTCJojo4u Ja die "Stockwerke" waren schon als building unpassend und habe ich jetzt entfernt. Geblieben ist nur man_made:part=yes.
12017-01-30 11:27:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the key "noezit" on several ways. Could you correct the spelling and move the tag to the last node of the way? (noexit is usually not put on the whole way, but just on the last unconnected node)
22017-01-31 17:16:23 UTCpaulbe done !
12017-01-30 09:44:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you define these two tags differently?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3213092963
opening_hours_비수기=AM 09:00 ~ AM 12:00
opening_hours_성수기=AM 08:00 ~ AM 1:00 (성수기)

What does '비수기' mean? Tags must be in English, otherwise they can not be understood by softw...
12017-01-30 09:41:39 UTCmueschel Hallo,
diese beiden Tags passsen nicht zum parking:lane-Schema. Kannst du da nochmal nachschauen?
parking:left:free = *
parking:right:residents = *
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane

Gruß, Jan
12017-01-27 11:48:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put several strange tags on these objects, like these:
heightBe_1 =m
heightBelo =3
numberOfFl =0
numberOf_1 =1

Could you convert them to well-defined tags?
Jan
22017-01-27 12:03:27 UTCtaborda Fixed :)
32017-01-30 09:34:29 UTCmueschel Looks like your fix wasn't uploaded correctly, the tags are still there.
12017-01-30 09:01:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
The hotel you added is already present in OSM:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1535788924
I deleted your new node because objects should be mapped only once.
12017-01-29 22:19:55 UTCmueschel Hallo,
aus welcher Quelle stammen diese Gebäudeumrisse? Hast du sichergestellt, dass die Lizenz dafür mit OSM / ODbL kompatibel ist?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-30 11:18:25 UTCstvmz backes Hallo,
ich bin Mitarbeiterin des Bauamts der Stadt Mainz. Die Stadt Mainz hat sich entschlossen, in die Pflege der Hausnummern und Gebäude in OSM einzusteigen. Die Gebäudeumrisse stammen aus eigenen Daten der Bauakte, sowie eigenen Luftbildern. Die Stadt Mainz prüft zur Zeit die Frei...
32017-01-30 12:12:04 UTCPolarbear Hallo stvmz backes, das ist ja wunderbar, dass ihr da auch selbst aktiv werdet. Die Nutzungsberechtigung eurer Daten und die Art des Zugangs müsste aber dokumentiert werden, und es muss erkennbar sein, dass der Erteiler der Erlaubnis dazu auch berechtigt ist. Ich empfehle hierzu den Kontakt zu ...
12017-01-29 14:53:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please explain the edits you made? Most of the keys you used are not defined and used nowhere else:
bibliographicCitation =ISSN 1927-0488 E-ISSN 1927-0496
nameAccordingTo = http://www.tropicos.org/Name/1701853
plot \tPlotLagoas15
references =http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v2n3p115...
22017-01-29 18:39:29 UTCnaoliv Markus, talvez você queira utilizar as tags corretas para representar as informações?
Por exemplo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:genus e/ou https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species e/ou https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:taxon
Se precisar de alguma ajuda pa...
12017-01-29 14:37:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469031630

24 = service looks like a mistake and I think the house number is wrong.

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-29 14:34:01 UTCmueschel Was soll uns das Tag "bug concat dup Road =yes" sagen?
22017-01-30 09:45:10 UTCkräckel C&P versehen
falscher Wert, ist berichtigt
Grüße & Danke
12017-01-28 16:56:05 UTCmueschel Hi Chris,
don't forget about the tag traffic_signals:direction on intersections like this with individually mapped traffic lights.
Jan
12017-01-28 16:51:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please note that all keys you use to identify an object needs to be in English - everything else is not understood by the software and is not shown on maps. Have a look to the wiki ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org ) to find the common tags.

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-27 11:56:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this way? If it is a road, please add a highway-Tag.
What is the meaning of the tag "Limpieza Lunes =equipo 1"?

Jan
12017-01-27 11:54:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put two uncommon tags on this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4629999312
maxspeed:2:forward =20
side =right

Could you change them to well-defined tags so that the information can be understood by software?

Jan
12017-01-27 11:50:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the key "name:Ko_rm" on many objects - the correct spelling is "name:ko_rm". I just fixed that.

Jan
12017-01-27 11:41:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several buildings on top of already existing ones. Could you have a look and correct these mistakes?
Additionally, you added many tags which have no meaning in OSM - only well-defined tags as described in the Wiki can be used. Examples:
Building \tYes
Capacity \t1000
Condtition \t...
12017-01-26 12:02:13 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du bei den alten Namen und Datumsangaben mit dem richtigen Format arbeiten? z.B. 1900-01-01--2000-12-31
Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Date_namespace
Sonst sind die Daten leider ziemlich nutzlos.
Gruß, Jan
22017-01-26 12:09:31 UTCjengelh Gut zu wissen! Werde ich dann noch anpassen, danke.
12017-01-25 12:31:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
may I point you to this proposal for mapping lane connections?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/transit
It's 'just' a proposal, but already used in some places.
Cheers, Jan
12017-01-25 12:24:02 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier sehr viele Häuser mit dem Tag "Wirling = 8" hochgeladen, kannst du das korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-25 15:13:00 UTCgerhard81 Hallo Jan! Danke ans aufmerksam machen. Ich kümmere mich die Tage darum.
Grüße Gerhard
12017-01-25 12:19:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this parking lot?
This tag is strange: capacity:disabledy = street_lamp
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467673707

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-25 12:15:06 UTCmueschel There are again 1500++ buildings with wrong tags. Could you fix the tagging before uploading to OSM? There is just no need to distribute this information to hundreds of users and then changing it a few days later.

addr_num
addr_stree
shrt

Btw, the source given in your changeset is wrong.
22017-01-25 23:59:32 UTCAndrew Matheny Fixed. These are fields that are dropped/mapped to OSM tags before import, but it sometimes doesn't happen with the repetitive process :)
12017-01-24 22:06:06 UTCmueschel Bitte nicht blind "junction = roundabout" an jede kreisförmige Straße schreiben. Wendehämmer sind keine Kreisel.
22017-01-24 22:57:58 UTCLothar Schiborr_1 Stimmt, war Blödsinn. Ist zwar eine Wendestelle, gebaut wie
mini_roundabout. Was ist richtig.
Wendestelle oder Minikreisel
32017-01-24 23:35:15 UTCmueschel Wenn keine Schilder stehen, ist es weder ein roundabout noch ein mini-roundabout. Entweder ein node mit highway=turning_loop oder einfach eine ringförmige Straße - kreisförmig würde ich sie allerdings in der Regel eher nicht machen, mehr wie ein Tropfen oder ein "P" ge...
42017-01-25 12:19:02 UTCLothar Schiborr_1 Hier würde ich ihn als Kreis lassen wie er ist, bildet die Wirklichkeit ab
12017-01-24 22:10:38 UTCmueschel Hallo,
geht dieser Kreisel wirklich in die falsche Richtung?
http://osm.org/node/254598207

Jan
22017-01-24 22:22:44 UTCblauer_elefant k.A.; ich habe auf den bing-Luftbildern gesehen, dass dort ein Minikreisel ist und habe in JOSM die entsprechende Vorlage genutzt ohne darauf zu achten, ob die eine Richtung hat/angibt. Ich könnte das demnächst prüfen.
--jens
32017-01-24 22:35:39 UTCmueschel Dann lösche ich das mal, da hast du wahrscheinlich aus Versehen etwas ausgewählt. Bei "normalen" Kreiseln ist die Angabe ja überflüssig.
42017-01-24 22:41:51 UTCblauer_elefant danke. ich achte beim nächsten Mal drauf
12017-01-24 22:32:37 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was spricht denn gegen highway=preproposed? Das ist das übliche Tag für eine Straße in diesem Planungsstand.
Gruß, Jan
22017-01-25 05:52:00 UTCGerdP Hallo Jan,

siehe diese CS-Diskussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/7372351#map=11/49.8861/9.7954
12017-01-24 11:29:21 UTCmueschel Hallo,
das Tagging kommt mir falsch vor.
- Die Straße ist immer motor_vehicle=private, außer jetzt sind wegen der Baustelle Lieferfahrzeuge erlaubt.
- Das Tag "temporary = date_on=2017-01-14" gibt es nicht, Zeiten werden mittels der conditional-Syntax angegeben.
- Warum is...
22017-01-26 08:37:42 UTCvillage Hm, ich weiß nicht, ob du die Situation vor Ort gesehen hast: Die Straße ist vorhanden, aber auf diesem Teil komplett gesperrt, der Fußweg auf der rechten Seite gar nicht mehr vorhanden - und dient als Baustellenzufahrt.
Wenn da jetzt wirklich gebaut wird, dauert das bestimmt 1&fr...
12017-01-24 09:58:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 25 objects with the key "brrier" in your edits, would you mind correcting that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-24 10:14:57 UTCSK53 Fixed: copying tags from object to object has it's issues :-)
12017-01-24 09:57:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are some new "buildlings" added by you:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/lsV
22017-01-24 18:24:20 UTCnjsurf1813 mueschel,

Indeed they have. I'd made a circular building in josm with the 'buildlings' tag and haven't been too careful to make sure that future not-made-with-building-tool buildings are not accidentally tagged the same I suppose.Thanks for looking out. I will fix and make sure I don't make the m...
12017-01-22 18:31:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
SUR=GRO looks like a mistake
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467476183

Jan
22017-01-22 19:17:11 UTCLuuuddooo Thanks a lot Jan for noticing this mistake ! I probably thought JOSM would autocomplete to surface=ground but it couldn't work because of CAPS LOCK...
12017-01-21 20:13:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this relation?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6894134
I don't understand the key "-- = 7"

Jan
12017-01-21 20:10:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
there is a spelling mistake in the fcc key on this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1785267661
Could you check and correct it?
22017-01-24 19:55:10 UTCmicahcochran I have corrected the misspelled tag. Thanks!
12017-01-21 20:06:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some ref-Tags with varying spelling. Could you use a consistent tag?
ref:eUR27
ref:eur27
ref:eEUR27
REF:EUR27
ref:eUnis
REF:EUNIS
Common practice seems to be ref:EUNIS and ref:EUR27
22017-01-21 21:19:55 UTCfrancoLI First I apologize for my bad English. I'm using google translator.
I thought that tags were not case sensitive.
I will try to correct.
the difference between EUR 27 and EUNIS is how subtle. EUR27 refer basically to the areas of Applied directives Habitat, while EUNIS is more general and sometimes...
12017-01-21 20:02:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many ways with strange tags, like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467016766

Could you have a look and correct these?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-22 05:21:10 UTCdnwilson Thanks for letting me know I have fixed it.
It was caused by cut and past going very wrong.
12017-01-21 19:56:53 UTCmueschel Here is another new way with strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466974600

22017-01-21 20:21:31 UTCpiligab Hi Mueschel.
I proceeded to change the tags. Thanks for your feedback.
Regards.
12017-01-21 18:08:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found tags like
sidewalk hazard
travel hazard
trip hazard
Sidewalkhazards
on several objects.
This might be a good description of something,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look to the wiki about common
tags.

Jan
12017-01-21 13:45:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found this way with strange tags. Could you correct this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467242504

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-21 15:48:36 UTCtaborda Hi. Sorry. I have made a mistake. I Will solve it. Thanks.
12017-01-21 13:31:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
wo kommen den diese ganzen Informationen her? Von Bing, wie du angibst, sicher nicht.

Außerdem ist beim Tagging einiges schiefgelaufen.
generator:output:electricity=yes/kWh - da macht der Wert keinen Sinn
generator: location - da gehört kein Leerzeichen rein
Und alle Knoten de...
22017-01-21 14:31:27 UTCDD1GJ Zudem sind die Häuser jetzt doppelt vorhanden. Daher habe ich alles zurückgesetzt
32017-01-26 09:31:20 UTCNakaner @DD1GJ @mueschel siehe meinen Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45504461
12017-01-20 22:45:53 UTCmueschel Bitte fügen nicht blind "junction = roundabout" an Wege an, nur weil Osmose eine Warnung anzeigt. Ein roundabout muss immer mit einem entsprechenden blauen Schild ausgestattet sein, das ist bei Wendeplätzen wie diesem sicher nicht der Fall.
22017-01-20 22:50:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't add "junction = roundabout" to places like this. This tag is only used in case there are the corresponding traffic signs and rules in place.
32017-01-29 18:43:50 UTCvenerdi I apologize for the error. I deduced the rules of precedence from aerial photos and I could not check for traffic signal. Thanks for your correction. In the case of closed lines that are reported as errors by Osmose it would probably be better to divide them into two parts to avoid the problem.
12017-01-20 22:28:51 UTCmueschel Hallo,
dein mapping von einfachen Kreuzungen mit sehr vielen einzelnen Wegen entspricht nicht der gängen Praxis und führt zu vielen Problemen, z.B. an dieser Kreuzung:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45137545#map=19/50.46256/8.37944
Da stimmen in vielen Fällen die jetzt not...
12017-01-20 22:13:30 UTCmueschel Hallo,
bei deinen Edits von Waldwegen sind hier in der Gegend sehr viele "überlappende Wege" entstanden. D.h. zwei Wege, die auf einem ganzen Stück übereinander liegen. Würdest du da nochmal einen Blick drauf werfen?

http://keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12&l...
12017-01-19 11:39:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
this valley has a strange tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465942245
"Val Désél = Senté de la Gesa"
Is this the name?

Jan
22017-01-19 12:22:46 UTCCarlo Folini Sorry, my fault! It should be a 'name' tag.
Thanks for pointing me to this.

Can I ask you how do you discovered it?

Ciao Carlo
32017-01-19 12:51:08 UTCmueschel I wrote a small script that shows all the new keys appearing in the database:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
12017-01-18 20:25:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

You added many objects with tags like
area =yes
name =lote2

You may see that these are not shown on the map - all objects need a tag describing what they are, for example building=yes or amenity=hospital. Have a look to the OSM Wiki to find these tags.

Let me know if ...
12017-01-18 20:20:13 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier ein merkwürdiges Tag vergeben, kannst du das kontrollieren?
Weissenegg =visit=from_outside

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1546774
22017-01-18 20:47:38 UTCnebulon42 Da ist definitiv was schiefgegangen, danke für den Hinweis.
32017-01-18 20:50:06 UTCnebulon42 Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45281656.
12017-01-18 14:19:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
Please watch out for the correct spelling of keys - i corrected several spelling mistakes in the last days, but I don't know if I found all of them.

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-18 21:20:03 UTCHairyCoo Sorry, I typed too fast. I will pay more attention in the future! HairyCoo
12017-01-17 09:53:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these buildings have the key 'shrt' - is this a mistake during import? It's not used in any other place.

Jan
22017-01-17 16:16:58 UTCAndrew Matheny Jan-

Yep, this is an extra tag I bring in during the import to be able to categorize buildings that overlap multiple land uses. I've removed them from the buildings.

Thanks!

Andrew
12017-01-16 20:24:49 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du bei den Edits nochmal nach der Schreibweise schauen? Ein paar Fehler habe ich korrigiert, weiß aber nicht, ob es alle waren.
Beispiele:
lames:backwards
lanes:backwards
lanes:turn = through;left;through

Beim letzten musst du nochmal ran, da weiß ich nicht was der ...
22017-01-25 21:13:35 UTCLokalfuerst Hallo mueschel, kann vermutlich nur ueber dieses Textfenster antworten.. Das Taggen mit lanes habe ich noch nicht so oft gemacht. Habe da einen Syntax-Fehler gemacht; "|" und ";" nicht richtig eingesetzt. Habe das korritiert. Danke fuer den Hinweis und viele Grüsse Lokalfuer...
12017-01-16 20:11:38 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Tagging schauen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464578456
Ich kann es leider nicht korrigieren, weil ich nicht weiß welche Art von Lift es ist:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aerialway

Gruß, Jan
12017-01-16 11:39:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of all those tags you used in various changesets?

mikrodistrict
mikrodistriot
microdiscript
microdistrct
microdistrict

OSM can only be useful if only well-defined keys are used. Please have a look in the wiki to find an appropriate key.

Jan
12017-01-15 11:58:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
Pizza Lazio has got two opening_hour tags, contradicting each other. Could you check this?
22017-01-15 12:51:47 UTCHjart Fixed according to website
12017-01-13 13:34:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465259458

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-13 14:37:44 UTCsamely Hi Jan,
Can you be more specific, please? I checked it out, however, I didn't find anything special.

Regards,
Eliane
32017-01-13 14:39:35 UTCmueschel The way has the tag "170 south=Andover Lane"
42017-01-13 14:45:09 UTCsamely I was reviewing the big street, thanks for pointing this out, I've already fixed it.
12017-01-13 14:09:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4604550676

"pl = h"


Cheers, Jan
12017-01-13 13:28:44 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was heißt denn "car service = Breakdown"? Das Tag ist eine Neuerfindung.

Gruß, Jan
12017-01-13 12:10:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the spelling of tags? I found 73 ways with the tag "intermitant" which should be "intermittent".

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-13 09:42:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these buildings have many strange tags that don't belong to OSM

FEATURE_TY=2000
Join_Count=1
ParcelJoin=1
PointJoin=1
ResCom=R
SHAPE_Area=2020.05568017
TARGET_FID=119888
addr_num=1831
addr_stree=Huntingdon Avenue
shrt=SFH

Could you clea...
22017-01-13 15:24:35 UTCAndrew Matheny Jan-

Good catch! Updated to remove them (and correct the address tags where needed).

Thanks!
12017-01-12 11:44:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are 141 nodes with tags like these that do not belong into the OSM database:
COORD_X \t727218
COORD_Y \t4375519
ID \t152906
NUMERO \t63

Could you correct this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-12 12:09:19 UTCmiguel_cc Hi!!

Yesterday I began todo use foro first time the JOSM editor, so I had some problems with the tags.

Todas I'm going yo correct that mistakes.

Thank you for your comment.

miguel_cc
12017-01-12 11:21:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you review the tagging of this area? I don't know what you wanted to tag so I can't fix it.

Jan
22017-01-12 13:17:17 UTCmaldav I wanted to tag an area as an urban farm but to show comment on the use and user. It was obviously a make to delineate the area with a line.
I have now drawn an area and described it as landuse=farm, and added the comments with a spot tag. Long term I want to use coloured tags for Food Security...
12017-01-12 10:07:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging? This tag looks weird:
31/5=Аламедин-1 микрорайон
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391685946

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-11 11:44:16 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier leider die Straßenverbindung gekappt - gab es an der Kreuzung eine Änderung, die du mappen wolltest, oder ist das nur ein Versehen?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-11 12:21:54 UTCMinitoffel Hallo Jan, bisher hat die Lauterbadstraße erst bei Nummer 10 begonnen. Die Straßburger Straße erst bei Nummer 7. Die Straßburger Straße beginnt aber schon da, wo sie jetzt eingezeichnet ist, die Lauterbadstraße beginnt ebenfalls am Promenadeplatz. Ich habe beide S...
32017-01-11 12:27:29 UTCmueschel Zoom auf der Karte ganz weit rein und drücke zur Sicherheit F5, damit alle Kacheln neu geladen werden. Du hast den zentralen Knoten auf der Kreuzung gelöscht, damit sind die Straßen jetzt nicht mehr verbunden.

Ich kann das heute abend wieder korrigieren. Am besten macht man da ein...
42017-01-11 12:49:42 UTCMinitoffel Ah o.k. verstehe. Das wollte ich nicht, sorry. Aber kannst Du es so machen, dass die Straßburger Straße und die Lauterbadstraße am Knotenpunkt beginnen? Und könntest Du bitte den Promenadeplatz bestehen lassen? Wenn Du einen Revert machst, ist das alles wieder weg, und das w&a...
52017-01-11 19:34:05 UTCmueschel So, die Kreuzung stimmt wieder.
Das leisure=common habe ich dem Platz abgenommen und auf place=locality geändert.

Die Loßburger geht jetzt natürlich bis in die Mitte der Kreuzung, das ist aber so üblich. Da Straßen ja nur Linien sind in OSM gibt es da immer leichte Abs...
62017-01-11 21:59:54 UTCMinitoffel Super, so gehen alle Straßen bis zum Knotenpunkt. Ich bitte nochmals um Entschuldigung, ich wusste nicht, dass ich was rauslösche. Im April beginnen die Bauarbeiten für den Kreisel auf dem Promenadeplatz, dann wird es nochmal irgendwann eine Änderung geben. Viele Grüß...
12017-01-11 11:49:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
looks like you wanted to tag some opening_hours (note the spelling!) here, but the tag looks strange:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365953558

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-11 18:40:08 UTCNiels Elgaard Larsen There was an access tag saying "only wednesdays" in Danish. I thought opening_hours would be more appropriate. I fixed the typo now.
32017-01-11 18:45:05 UTCmueschel Alright. The shortest opening_hours value I ever saw ;-)
12017-01-11 11:31:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the ':name' tag of this forest? Looks like you wanted to use another key there.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222070183
22017-01-11 11:40:18 UTCSK53 Thanks it needed a source:name
12017-01-11 10:24:42 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du diesen Key hier korrigieren?
http://osm.org/node/4596238593
"direction_waet"

Gruß, Jan
12017-01-11 10:21:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 219 hydrants with the key 'posi', which is not used in any other place.
I think that a tag like this would be more appropriate and easier to understand by others:
description = position: sidewalk

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-11 11:10:43 UTCjendrusk Hi,
Sorry - my mistake - it should be fire_hydrant:position. I'll fix it :)
Cheers
12017-01-10 11:37:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
http://osm.org/relation/2442510
could you check / fix the tag "åå = BE", looks strange.

Jan
22017-01-10 11:43:28 UTCescada Fixed.
thanks for letting me know
12017-01-10 11:32:10 UTCmueschel Hallo,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464103122
Der Key 'Backhaus" macht so wenig Sinn,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbakehouse
22017-01-10 12:20:35 UTCLothar Schiborr_1 Danke,
erledigt
12017-01-10 11:26:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't put the names of people in the OSM database. This is private information and does not belong into a public map.

Jan
12017-01-10 11:23:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this bridge?
"bridge:re`" looks like a mistake.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464346005

Jan
12017-01-10 10:50:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 195 buildings in your changesets with a spelling mistake:
"buildling=yes"
Could you have a look and correct these?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/l9U

Jan
22017-01-13 13:29:33 UTCnjsurf1813 Jan!
Thanks for finding this.
Getting this fixed right away.
- Max
12016-11-09 12:31:28 UTCmueschel Hi & welcome to OSM!

On several of the objects you added, I saw tags like "Justice Hall = yes" or "Nasugbu Auditorium/Evacuation Center = yes". These tags can not be understood by software and should be changed to something else.
E.g. if it is the name of the object, put ...
22017-01-10 02:22:52 UTCpayan yes ineed help,from the time i upload some added buildings,and close the josm.after i opened some bulidings and structure i uploaded was missing but in open street map isaw it
32017-01-10 09:21:19 UTCmueschel What exactly is missing? Please give some examples.
12017-01-09 10:06:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several tracks with an "acces" tag - "access" is written with two 's'. Could you check this?
Btw, is all access private? E.g. you are not allowed to enter by foot?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-09 13:01:51 UTCFrédéric Gutkin Hello Jan,

Sorry for the "acces" in place of "access" :P ! Thank you for your comment. I corrected it...
In fact, I went on place (Freux, Bougnimont, Séviscourt...) about one month ago. It's a large private area of fishing and a prohibition panel (also for pedestrians...
32017-01-09 13:15:41 UTCmueschel Alright then. I just asked because many people use 'access' when they actually mean 'vehicle'.
12017-01-09 11:23:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
found the key "name:end_date" on two nodes - this tag is not used in other places. You could use name:DATE instead, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Date_namespace

Jan
22017-01-09 19:13:23 UTCjptolosa87 Thanks for the info: I've fixed them.
12017-01-09 11:16:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this way?
"namep = County Route 16/8"
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15520161

Jan
22017-01-10 16:51:51 UTCmaxerickson Fixed it. 'namep' was a typo from switching name_1 and name. The address I added used the value in name so I assumed it was the main value but didn't want to delete the other value (counties do often have a secondary system of labeling roads but it would need a survey to know for sure if anything is...
12017-01-08 13:36:47 UTCmueschel Halo,
was heißt denn "Toyota = i-Road" an vielen Häusern hier?
Das "description" tag halte ich auch für etwas merkwürdig. Warum nicht building = residential oder house?

Gruß, Jan
12017-01-08 13:30:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
please note that all tags have to be in English, as documented in the wiki.
For example this node:
https://osm.org/node/4592645240
should have the tag shop = hairdresser

Could you review your edits and change the tagging?

Cheers, Jan


12017-01-08 13:03:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "спорткомплекс" here - tags should always be in English. Did you mean leisure = sports_centre?

Jan
12017-01-08 12:36:00 UTCmueschel Here are at least two more ways with strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463735984
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463734477

Jan
22017-01-10 02:32:26 UTCpiligab Hi Mueschel,
I am sorry.
Thank you for bringing this to my notice. What you have mentioned is right. Hence, I have corrected the tag of my changeset. Thanks for your feedback.
Regards.
12017-01-08 10:05:06 UTCPT-53 Hallo mueschel,
nach dem Verschieben der Note durch Dich zeigt keep right jetzt diese Fehlermeldung an:
http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=81138106&zoom=17&lat=47.95291&lon=9.32812&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C20&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
Erledigt Du das ?
Gr&...
22017-01-08 12:26:08 UTCmueschel Doppelter Node ist entfernt. Das lag aber nicht an meinem Umtagging, die Nodes lagen vorher schon übereinander - und ob dieser Node an dieser Stelle überhaupt Sinn macht weiß ich nicht, die Form der Wasserfläche ist ja etwas ungewöhnlich.
12017-01-07 13:58:58 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du hier nochmal drüberschauen?
- Adress-Nodes sollten nicht das Tag building=yes haben wenn sie innerhalb eines Gebäudes liegen
- Entweder soll das Gebäude die Adressinformationen haben, oder es gibt einen Adress-Node, aber nicht beides gleichzeitig (und das teilweise...
12017-01-06 11:52:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tags you put on the roads do not fully match your description: If you want to allow busses _only_, you also have to close the road to other traffic, e.g. by an additional
motor_vehicle:backward:conditional = no @ 06:00 - 22:00.

Let me know if you need help!
Jan
22017-01-06 12:07:43 UTCAmZaf Thanks for your attention. I added the motor_vehicle restriction as a default value when the conditional restriction does not apply, i.e. after 10 p.m. This means that the backward lane is open to all traffic after 10 p.m.
OSM documentation referenced below says that a conditional restriction is ...
32017-01-06 12:13:03 UTCmueschel This applies only if it's the same key, e.g. vehicle and vehicle:conditional.

A key like 'bus' doesn't make any assumptions on other type of traffic. I'd suggest:

motor_vehicle = no #closed for the major part of the day
motor_vehicle:conditional = yes @ 22:00 - 06:00 #allowed 22 - 06
bus ...
42017-01-06 12:16:39 UTCAmZaf I'll make the relevant changes. Thanks you.
12017-01-06 11:38:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
you created four roads with very strange tags, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463734354

Could you have a look & fix it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-06 13:28:08 UTCpiligab Hi Mueschel,

Thank you for bringing this to my notice. What you have mentioned is right. Hence, I have corrected the tag of my changeset. Thanks for your feedback.
Regards.
12017-01-06 10:29:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 240 nodes with all foreign tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4590931216

Looks like something went wrong there. Please don't forget to name the source of your data and check if licenses are compatible.

Jan
12017-01-05 11:58:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this parking?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463454965

start_hours and end_hours are no common tags. The right tag could "opening_hours" or "maxstay_conditional"

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-05 09:45:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tags on this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4582450961
Looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-06 10:26:51 UTCPeter_Klofutar_import Deleted, thanks.

Regards, Peter
12017-01-05 09:41:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't put tags like this
Catandaan HighSchool=yes
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463579172

The other tags like amenity and name already describe the object well enough. Non-standard tags like "Catandaan HighSchool" don't help OSM because there is no software that can int...
12017-01-04 22:03:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
are you sure this way exists or did you just trace it according to Bing images? I thought it had been removed.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419945835
22017-01-05 01:04:22 UTCOpk Was not traced, I definitely walked along it and can actually remember it. tracktype = 4 is perhaps generous, especially for the Southern end. Entrances were also less clear but there was a very distinct path and I know I passed a couple of other people along it. When you say that you thought it had...
12016-05-02 17:06:07 UTCDD1GJ Hallo UI2015, wie hast Du die ganzen Koordinaten ermittelt bzw.welche Quelle hast Du verwendet?
22016-05-04 06:59:39 UTCUI2015 Hallo DD1GJ, die Koordinaten und Adressen, welche ich hinzugefügt habe, stammen aus einer Liste des örtlichen Wasserversorgers. Er hat eine Liste der Wasserzähler in allen Haushalten in Künzell und hier die zugehörige Adressen und Koordinaten. Diese Adressen habe ich fü...
32016-05-04 07:51:10 UTCDD1GJ Danke für die Auskunft. Die Details werden gerade auf dem direkten Weg geklärt.
42016-05-16 07:11:05 UTCnafl Hallo,

ich korrigiere gerade Fehler die mir KeepRight meldet.
Leider sind bei den ganzen Häusern die Adressen nochmal in einem zusätzlichen Punkt innerhalb der Gebäude eingetragen.
Und diese Punkte sind ebenfalls als Gebäude gekennzeichnet (was sie ja nicht sind)
Man kö...
52016-05-16 10:01:21 UTCDD1GJ Hallo NAFL,

die Rechtmäßigkeit der Datenherkunft wird gerade geklärt. Es kann sein, dass alle Änderungen von UI2015 zurückgesetzt werden müssen.
62016-10-15 19:50:37 UTCmueschel Hat sich hier inzwischen etwas ergeben?
72016-10-15 20:01:09 UTCDD1GJ Der örtliche Wasserversorger ist fast damit fertig, die Hauskoordinaten durch die Ableser erfassen zu lassen, so dass sie der Teilnehmervereinbarung entsprechen. Vermutlich im November wird dann die Wiki-Seite zur Diskussion eines dann fachgerechten Imports erstellt werden.
82016-12-23 13:55:09 UTCsurveyor54 Ich habe hier einmal etwas recherchiert.
Der Wasserversorger hat die Daten höchstwahrscheinlich von hier.
https://hvbg.hessen.de/irj/HVBG_Internet?cid=86659dc09ae74e0e83190c96a152a981
Diese Koordinaten scheinen Deckungsgleich mit den importierten zu sein. Ich hatte die Möglichkeit dies...
92017-01-01 17:38:56 UTCmueschel Das klingt für mich, als sollte hier nun zuerst einmal ein Revert erfolgen?
102017-01-02 13:10:02 UTCDD1GJ Hallo, ich habe diese Adressen sowie die aus vorausgegangenen Changesets gelöscht. Es war etwas Eile geboten, weil ein anderer User begonnen hatte, die Hausnummern auf associated streets Relationen umzustellen.
112017-01-04 21:55:16 UTCmueschel Ist geklärt, wie die restlichen Adressen, z.B. in Engelhelms entstanden sind?
www.openstreetmap.org/node/3904954564/history
12017-01-04 13:06:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
please stop importing data until you have fixed the spelling mistake!
See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44859230

Btw, is the license of this data source compatible with OSM?

Jan
12017-01-04 13:03:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you created 73 objects with only foreign tags. Could you correct this?
E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463512916

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-04 18:13:20 UTCgeow Hi Giomieres and a warm welcome to OpenStreetMap. It appears that you've imported a significant number of hydrographic features (488 ways with 7244 nodes).

1. As mentioned above by "mueschel" you haven't used the the proper tags for waterways, which are defined in our wiki
http://wiki...
12017-01-03 12:00:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check your tagging? Tags should be in english and follow common tagging rules documented in the wiki.
E.g. here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4583510317
Naprawa=spierdolonego
chodnika=wraz
przy=Ślężnej
z=ddr

Jan
22017-01-14 23:51:04 UTCmaraf24 You bet he should, but he won't as he never do.
12017-01-03 10:26:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check these edits? There are 446 objects with the tag "addre:country" which should be "addr:country"

Jan
12017-01-02 12:57:07 UTCmueschel Why did you delete this hotel? Please use changeset comments!
12017-01-02 12:15:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this object? It has two contradicting wall tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129771941

Jan
12017-01-01 18:26:50 UTCmueschel Hallo,
hier ist beim Erstellen der Multipolygone einiges schief gegangen. Die Wege selbst dürfen keine Tags mehr haben, z.B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456955625

Siehe auch:
http://keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=50.62574&lon=10.13123&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30&...
12017-01-01 14:54:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw several tags with Cyrillic letters in your edits. Could you have a look and change them to common, English tags? Otherwise they are not useful for OSM.
I was able to correct some, but not all of them.

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-12 17:34:27 UTCmavl This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
12017-01-01 14:43:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the tags time and time_1 on this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4580887377

Maybe you can use a tag like "opening_hours" instead?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-01 22:58:55 UTCgeoaria Hi
Thanks for your hints .
.In the hours for half an hour opens.
Clock insertion, time of prayer.
I wish,  There is also an option for prayer times. Since its opening, it depends on the sunrise and sunset.

I think I should correct.
:)
12017-01-01 14:42:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
this building has the tag "hous = water" which seems strange. Could you clarify what it is supposed to be?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461786425

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-01 14:58:33 UTCSuffolkNY Jan,

Sorry, that's a mistake. It should be building=house (this is not a garage).

Michael
32017-01-01 21:22:29 UTCNorthfork I corrected it and checked other buildings around Jamesport for the tag "hous=water". It was the only building.
12017-01-01 13:38:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
please indicate the source of this information. Is the sources license compatible with ODbL?

Jan
12016-12-31 15:29:23 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was heißt denn
access = block
blocktype = fence
Das sind keine Tags die anderswo verwendet werden. Meinst du access=no, barrier=fence?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-01 16:43:19 UTCturbojoe Hey Jan, mehr Auswahl hatte das genutzte Tool nicht angeboten, und zum nacharbeiten bin ich letzte Woche nicht gekommen.
Ist aktualisiert.
12016-12-31 15:20:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the tag "food_prone = yes"? You used it several times, but it is not used any where else.

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-31 16:02:56 UTCLuuuddooo Hi Jan, thanks a lot for your remark, it's a typo, I wanted to set http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flood_prone, I'll correct that.
Cheers, Ludo.
12016-12-31 14:30:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
The tag 'pl:Sieruciowce =administrative' looks like a mistake.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31519348

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-31 16:05:30 UTCWładysław Komorek Fixed.
12016-12-31 14:26:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
this relation and several others have many tags that look like they don't belong to OSM. Could you check that?

ACRES \t14489.62
EASE_OPEN \tOpen
EASE_STATU \tOpen to All Use
OBJECTID \t8844
PROP_NAME \tNAVARINO WILDLIFE AREA
RE_INFO_UR \thttp://dnr.wi.gov/topic/lands/WildlifeAreas/navar...
22016-12-31 17:41:17 UTCSkybunny Fixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44811227 to use OSM compliant tags in all cases. My apologies.

Best,
12016-12-31 14:23:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
your source tags have ticks (') in the key which shouldn't be there. Could you fix this? Actually, there is no need to put these tags, the information is already in the source tag of the changeset itself.

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-31 15:44:51 UTCAleks-Berlin I have fixed it now. I also have fixed some others some days ago. Alex
12016-12-31 14:15:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
the two tags
barrier:gate \tyes
barrier:gate:access \tno
are not used in any other place. Could you describe the barrier and who can get through in words?

Jan
22016-12-31 15:44:25 UTClokejul The barrier is a fence across the entire 3m width of the path. one end of the fence is a cycle barrier. The rest of the fence is locked chain-link gate.

I will retry with a different set of tags.
12016-12-31 14:11:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node? Something went wrong with the tagging:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4577832566

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-31 14:37:35 UTCPab09 Fixed, thanks.
12016-12-31 14:01:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du das Tagging nochmal überprüfen?
In einigen Keys (z.B. railway:signal:typ) schreibst du type ohne e (zusammen mindestens 16 Mal) und teilweise auch mit einem Großbuchstaben am Anfang.

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-01 10:57:05 UTCSuerlaenner Hallo und frohes neues Jahr! Ich habe schon gemerkt das das Tagging in Arnsberg, Bf nicht erfolgreich war. In Neheim-Hüsten hat es schon besser funktioniert. Ich ändere es die Tage nochmal ab.
Schönen Gruß
Christopher
12016-12-31 13:55:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this area? Keys must be in English and only keys described in the wiki should be used.

Cheers, Jan
12016-12-31 13:51:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
I don't really understand the tagging of these objects, could you explain?
barrier = block - Barriers should be part of a way, some of these are not.
building:colurs = concrete - there is no building tagged, and 'concrete' is not a colour
colour = concrete - 'concrete' is not a col...
12016-12-31 13:33:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
may I ask for the source of data of all these hotels? There are many issues with this data:

- most hotels I checked already exist in the OSM database
- you deleted some existing hotels
- the tagging of the new nodes is wrong. Tags like addr:tourism, addr:phone or addr:name do not exist.
12016-12-29 21:29:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way uses some uncommon tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462120108
cyclestreet = yes
cycleway = cyclestreet

Did you mean
bicycle_road = yes ?

Jan
22016-12-30 12:34:40 UTCmarczoutendijk @mueschel:
In the Netherlands we have a special type of road (Fietsstraat) that is for bicycles, but vehicles are allowed.
See:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging.
See overpass for its use:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kWo
32016-12-30 13:01:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
I didn't notice the spelling mistake in the key (3x e in streeet) and then wasn't able to find any other use of this key.

Btw, such a road in Germany would be tagged as
bicycle_road = yes
motor_vehicle=yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Fahrradstrasse_IMGP8343_smial_wp.jpg
42016-12-30 13:47:51 UTCmarczoutendijk I fixed the typo in cyclestreet.

52016-12-30 13:50:21 UTCmarczoutendijk Using the tagging you propose isn't the solution because of different legal rights for both type of roads.
62016-12-30 13:54:46 UTCmueschel If it's established tagging, it's fine with me. I didn't want to start a discussion about it. On the other hand, even a highway=motorway has different legal rights in different countries. So there might be a chance to find a common tagging in the future.

Cheers, Jan
72016-12-30 14:08:48 UTCmarczoutendijk This subject (cyclestreet) sure has the attention of the Dutch mapping community!
12016-12-30 13:14:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
the parking place has two tags
customers = yes
pulic = no (note the spelling mistake)

Usually this is tagged as
access=customers.

Cheers, Jan
12016-12-29 13:38:54 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM!
I think you have a spelling mistake on this node, what does "slnow=Slide" mean?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4573490972

Jan
12016-12-29 13:37:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
did you check the license of this data? The website mentions a "Copyrightvermerk" is needed, OSM can't guarantee this.

Jan
22016-12-29 16:00:55 UTCulamm That is no problem of the licence, as long as we do not copy the course from public servers.

The source for correct name of any element of the landscape are official maps and official data servers.
The only way to avoid invented names is to cite the official sources.

Normally I'd only note th...
32017-01-01 20:25:54 UTCdatendelphin Hi ulamm
Unfortunately we can not use Swisstopo, also not for correcting the spelling. Valid sources can be documents or news paper articles. Best would be a sign on the ground. But the maps and databases are definitely off limits. Sorry. I hope you will find some other source.
12016-12-29 13:33:39 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM!
I found tags like these on this hotel:

Estacionamiento = Al lado cabaña
Etiquetas = Los Lleuques, Pinto, Ñuble, Bío Bío, Chile
parrilla = SI
piscina = SI

This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no so...
12016-12-28 14:09:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this object?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426194034
The tag looks strange:
12-0517 = uncontrolled
Jan
22016-12-28 14:49:01 UTCAndrzej3345 Thanks for indication. Already fixed.
Correct is ref=12-0517.
BTW, how you discovered that minor mistake - any proofing tool. Happy to hear if I can use it in the future.
32016-12-28 15:02:29 UTCmueschel Hi Andrzej,
I wrote a small tool that uses Taginfo to search for new keys:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
42016-12-28 17:18:25 UTCAndrzej3345 ok, thanks, I will look at it.
12016-12-28 14:39:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this building?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461677093
The tag "957 =753" looks strange.

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-04 00:54:01 UTCu_kubota Thank you for your comment.
This tag was given with an erroneous operation, it is not intentionally added.
So I deleted it.
12016-12-28 14:38:59 UTCmueschel Hallo,

an diesem Tag stimmt etwas nicht, was möchtest du ausdrücken?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30773848
"acces:conditional \tnone @ destination"

Gruß, Jan
22016-12-28 19:41:18 UTCrschwarz danke für den Hinweis, ich hatte die Tags für die bedingte Beschränkung verwechselt (gemeint war maxweight = 7.5 + Anlieger frei), soeben korrigiert.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions
-cheers-
12016-12-28 14:28:43 UTCmueschel Hallo,
hier stimmt wohl etwas mit dem Tagging nicht:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4571628022

Gruß, Jan
12016-12-28 14:25:56 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ist das ein Hotel oder heißt das Gebäude nur so? Falls ja, fehlt noch ein tourism=hotel tag.

Gruß, Jan
12016-12-28 14:24:15 UTCmueschel Hallo,
bitte achte mehr auf die Schreibweise von Keys. Ich korrigiere hier jede Woche Fehler in den Keys wie in opening_houts oder number_of_appartmentsappartments

Jan
12016-12-28 14:21:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4570794979
" Pradanella = Bar Roma" looks wrong.

Jan
22016-12-28 22:26:12 UTCsimone_girardelli My error, Predanella is name.
I corrected the tag, thanks for signalling.
12016-12-28 13:46:41 UTCmueschel Hallo,
wieso passt ein highway=footway, footway=crossing nicht mit einem Zeichen DE:240 zusammen?
22016-12-30 12:07:42 UTCOttonormalverbraucher Hallo,

gem. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland gibt es für das Zeichen DE:240 zwei Möglichkeiten: highway=path und highway=cycleway.
12016-12-28 13:16:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

I found some mistakes in this changeset:
All the nodes of the buildings got a "building=yes" tag - this tag should only be on the way representing the building.

Second, the buildings have some strange tags like "0_5M=0" which don't look like they belon...
22016-12-30 19:04:32 UTCpitscheplatsch further suspiciously changesets ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44703287

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44703287
12016-12-06 11:33:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found three trees with strange tags:
diameter_crown = width: 4.0; color: green;
thuja = occidentalis
Could you check these?

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-20 15:40:38 UTCpezza10 First of all I apologize myself but can I ask who you are?
and second why are strange tags?,which one of them?
32016-12-27 21:50:26 UTCmueschel I'm just another OSM mapper...

How can a 'diameter' be 'green'?
'thuja occidentalis' can be the species, but 'thuja' is not a recognized tag.
12016-12-27 14:11:01 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du diesen Parkplatz überprüfen? Das Tag 120=60 macht keinen Sinn:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194297499

Gruß, Jan
22016-12-27 16:55:24 UTCscai Oh, du hast natürlich recht. Das sollte capacity=120 werden. Hab es korrigiert, danke für den Hinweis!
12016-12-27 13:43:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
this node has a capacity, but no other tag. could you check that? Btw. there should be no capital letters in keys (usually)
http://osm.org/node/4565847889

Cheers, Jan
12016-12-27 13:26:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

Please make sure that the spelling of your tags is always correct - misspelled tags can not be understood by any software. Could you have a look to your edits and correct these mistakes?
E.g. I found:
fire_hydrant:citi
fire_hydrant:houaenumber
fire_hydrant:sireet
fire_hy...
12016-12-27 13:24:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check the spelling of your tags.
325x "fire_boundar" (should be fire_boundary)
23x "fire operator" (should be fire_operator)

Jan
12016-12-26 14:30:52 UTCmueschel Welcome to OSM!
I noticed some nodes with a tag like "walmart=walmart" - this doesn't help much, because there is no tag describing what it actually is. The correct way of tagging would be "shop=supermarket" "name=walmart".
You can find a lot of information on tagg...
12016-12-26 14:15:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tag
"baliisi = {toistopiste=false, uunta=laskeva}"
on four nodes - is this a mistake?

Cheers, Jan
12016-12-26 14:14:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are two poles with misspelled tags, 'bname' and 'bane'.
I think that these and all the name tags should be changed to ref=* - the numbers are not names, but reference numbers.

Cheers, Jan
12016-12-26 12:50:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
can you check this POI? It has 3 strange tags
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460833686

Republiki = Francji
note = some
sources = report

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-28 02:25:01 UTCkocio Thanks, I'll fix it! This is JOSM copying bug, but I thought I have managed to avoid it...
12016-12-26 12:46:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4170847320
The tags look rather suspicious:
deleted=as
per=\tcomment

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-26 18:12:10 UTCrehan727 this poi is placed at incorrect location. Also duplicate exists . so deleting this one now. thanks for pointing.
12016-12-24 12:22:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
it's 'recycling', not 'recyclyng'. I just fixed that for you.

Have some nice holidays, Jan
12016-12-24 10:59:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tag 'lvl' on these edits that doesn't exist in other places. I think it it the elevation of the points and should be 'ele' - but has to be converted to meters.

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-25 11:09:54 UTCjendrusk Of course you're right Jan - thanks. I'll fix it after x-mas. :)
12016-12-23 21:10:51 UTCmueschel Hi and welcome to OSM,
could you have a look to the tagging?
'opening_hours' needs to follow a well-defined syntax, otherwise it can not be read by software.
'description' is not meant to be used for advertising slogans
'service:bicycle:...' - please have a look to the wiki: https://wiki.opens...
12016-12-23 21:03:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tag "true =A" on 9 ways - looks like a mistake. Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-24 21:39:35 UTCtrolleway Fixed, thanks.
12016-12-23 21:00:12 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ich habe hier das Tag "footway:track =track" gefunden, das sonst nirgends verwendet wird. Was genau bedeutet es?

Gruß, Jan
22016-12-24 07:28:38 UTCOttonormalverbraucher Hallo Jan, es bedeutet, dass ich mich verschrieben habe. Es sollte links oder rechts heißen. Die Sache ist die, dass ich mich in Thüringen dazu habe hinreißen lassen, außerhalb meines eigentlichen Vorhabens Verkehrszeichen anzubringen, weitere Bearbeitungen durchzuführen,...
32016-12-25 11:50:04 UTCOttonormalverbraucher genannte Eintragung mittels http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44660105 zurückgesetzt
12016-12-23 20:53:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this import of data? All the nodes have many tags which don't seem to belong to the OSM database.

Btw, what is the source of this data? Is it available under a license compatible with ODbL?

Jan
mueschel has contributed to 500 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 974 comment(s) (limit: 500 changesets)