| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61455342 by DENelson83 | 1 | 2018-08-15 14:48:38 UTC | mueschel | Hi,is this a letter box belonging to houses nearby? This can be tagged as amenity=letter_box instead of post_box:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aamenity%3Dletter_boxJan |
| 2 | 2018-08-15 15:21:28 UTC | DENelson83 | It's a community mailbox, where mail for multiple addresses can be picked up. That fits the definition of "amenity=letter_box", so I have just changed it to that. Thank you for the suggestion. | |
| 61636006 by abdurohman | 1 | 2018-08-15 14:46:23 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tags 'dirtype=1' and 'type=*' on 26 objects. These are no common tags - could you explain what this means or remove them if they were added by mistake?Thanks, Jan |
| 61664140 by Алекс Мок | 1 | 2018-08-15 14:44:41 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "building_levels" on 500 buildings. The correct spelling is "building:levels". Could you have a look and chang this tag?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-08-15 14:51:25 UTC | Алекс Мок | Ok. Thanks,excuse me. | |
| 61657205 by Arvenia | 1 | 2018-08-15 14:42:49 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you introduced several new tags here, like 'service:computers:repair'. We should stick to already established tags instead of inventing new ones. E.g. computer:repair=yes or electronics_repair=computer.See also this discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61589555 |
| 61547791 by Jorieke V | 1 | 2018-08-11 10:01:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used a new key here, "is_in:LGA" - what does 'LGA' stand for?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-08-15 13:36:59 UTC | Jorieke V | That is one of the lowets admin areas in Nigeria - Local Government Area | |
| 3 | 2018-08-15 14:36:38 UTC | mueschel | Hi,there is already a variety of is_in:* tags. Usually a generic term is used and not a name specific to the country. What aboutis_in:countyis_in:subcounty ? | |
| 61589555 by chris-ren | 1 | 2018-08-13 12:08:57 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found some unusual keys in your edits.- "repair:bicycle=yes" -> usually "service:bicycle:repair = yes"- the 'name' tag is not an actual name, but a description and should be put to the 'description' tag.- 'repair:computer' -> 'computer:repair', see https://wiki... |
| 2 | 2018-08-13 13:03:05 UTC | chris-ren | Hi.This kind are workshop can't be considered as a shop or linked to craft. It's a free place where people are repairing for a null cost differents objets. It's "repair=assisted_self_service". Maybe it can be considered as a service.The node is different from the one of the place, ... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-13 13:14:49 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I didn't mean you should tag it as craft or shop - I just linked to this wiki page because of the list of 'repair' related tags.As SomeoneElse commented, have a look at taginfo, e.g. search for 'repair' and look through the list of repair-related tagshttps://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search... | |
| 4 | 2018-08-13 13:50:49 UTC | chris-ren | Ok.I'll changed with service:bicycle:repair=yes and computer:repair=yes. Regards. | |
| 61336438 by rurseekatze | 1 | 2018-08-11 10:44:18 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,du verwendest hier "population:check_date", üblicherweise wird aber "population:date" verwendet. Würdest du das anpassen?Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-08-13 19:06:34 UTC | rurseekatze | Hallo Jan,danke für den Hinweis. Da bin ich wohl mit population:date und check_date etwas durcheinander gekommen. Ich habe es in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61635886 korrigiert.GrußAlex | |
| 61297134 by Eltatet | 1 | 2018-08-11 10:30:45 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM! I have to remarks here:- you added the tag 'recycling:m' - seems like there are a few letters missing, could you check that?- opening hours have to use a well-defined format so that they can be understood by software. Have a look to the Wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.... |
| 61512753 by Jack the Ripper | 1 | 2018-08-11 10:15:28 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used two new tags here, 'payment:peach_pass' and 'payment:nc_quick_pass'. The keys '...peachpass' and 'NC_Quick_Pass' are already used in a few spots. Could you make sure that we use the same spelling in all cases? Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-08-12 05:49:04 UTC | Jack the Ripper | Hi Jan, the earlier keys were my doing, and are likely the incorrect ones. Georgia definitively puts a space in the name, so it is "Peach Pass" and not PeachPass (like Florida's SunPass without a space). And since nothing else is capitalized in tag value fields (the credit card is writte... | |
| 61452313 by rn tech 1 | 1 | 2018-08-11 10:07:53 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM! Please have a look to the wiki how tagging of indoor features like rooms work:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_MappingAdding 'building' tags and invent new keys like "Level 3" or "building_1" for rooms doesn't work. Also, please don't change e... |
| 61451581 by rntech | 1 | 2018-08-11 10:06:29 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM! Please have a look to the wiki how tagging of indoor features like rooms work:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_MappingAdding 'building' tags and invent new keys like "Level 3" or "building:levels_1" for rooms doesn't work. Cheers, Jan |
| 61186849 by Azam Firdaus | 1 | 2018-08-11 10:05:16 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM! Please have a look to the wiki how tagging of indoor features like rooms work:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_MappingAdding 'building' tags and invent new keys like "Level 3" or "building_1" for rooms doesn't work. Cheers, Jan |
| 61522895 by Crisfel Gerola | 1 | 2018-08-11 09:59:37 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please make sure all the tags use the correct spelling - the slightest mistake makes them unusable for any software.Could you fix these:roof materials -> roof:materialwall materials -> building:material-name=residential housePlease don't use such names. The name tag is f... |
| 61527544 by grueneberg | 1 | 2018-08-10 19:10:56 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,OSM ist kein Platz für Werbung. Solche Aussagen wie "Unsere Barkeeper freuen sich jeden Abend." gehören hier nicht hin. Die restlichen Angaben scheinen aber alle in Ordnung zu sein.Nur die Telefonnummer sollte im internationalen Format mit "+49..." angegeben w... |
| 2 | 2018-08-13 12:50:51 UTC | grueneberg | Dies war mein erster EIntrag danke für die Hilfe und Informationen LG Peter | |
| 61248171 by Diógenes de Sinope | 1 | 2018-08-10 08:19:31 UTC | mueschel | Hi,"public transport" corresponds to the key "psv" (if taxis are included) or "bus" (if taxis are not included). That means these two tags are correct:bus:lanes:conditional = |||designated @ (Mo-Fr 05:00-22:00)access:lanes:conditional = |||no @ (Mo-Fr 05:00-22:0... |
| 2 | 2018-08-10 08:20:24 UTC | mueschel | Addendum: 'hov' are private cars, but with more than 1 (or 2) passengers. | |
| 47170249 by MichaH | 1 | 2018-08-09 08:17:52 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,ich habe von dir mindestens 2 Frisörsalons gesehen wie diesen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4755950443Mit den Tags female=no, male=no und unisex=no wüsste ich nicht, wer da noch hingehen darf.Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-08-09 14:27:27 UTC | MichaH | Umm keine Ahnung, das muss eine Voreinstellung von vespucci-Vorlagen (gewesen) sein, bei der ich dann übersehen habe, die Werte zu ändern.Vermutlihc ist unisex=yes richtig, aber das ich heute nicht mehr mit 100% Sicherheit sagen.Gruß, Micha. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-09 14:45:55 UTC | mueschel | Ja, sieht wirklich so aus. Wir haben 229 davon weltweit. | |
| 61380650 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-08-08 21:44:02 UTC | SelfishSeahorse | HiPlease have a look at <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets#Gender_neutral_toilets>. Because unisex=yes has been used as a shortcut of female=yes + male=yes, this tag doesn't necessarily imply that the toilets are gender neutral.RegardsMarkus |
| 2 | 2018-08-08 22:27:26 UTC | mueschel | I wasn't aware of this discussion. To me the outcome of this discussion, as summarized by Rory, is "unisex is well defined" https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2018-April/080596.html 'unisex' was always defined as something non-segregated. If you see a reason to introduce a ... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-09 06:50:40 UTC | SelfishSeahorse | Some other people came to other conclusions:'If most existing data is using unisex to mean "there are both male andfemale toilets", then it doesn't matter one bit what the wiki says.' (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2018-April/080599.html)Even the iD editor lets you o... | |
| 4 | 2018-08-09 08:25:31 UTC | mueschel | Usually we try to start a project to clean up existing data if we find a problem how a tag has been used in the past.If you feel the urgent need to add a new tag, feel free to do so. But note that this still requires to check all "unisex" tagged objects, whether they used the actual de... | |
| 61402865 by 7andbo | 1 | 2018-08-08 11:06:33 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you please explain the meaning of these two objects? They don't have any common, documented tag.Jan |
| 61436076 by SiiG | 1 | 2018-08-08 11:00:26 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "ref:FR:Commune" several times - I would like to point out that the correct spelling is "ref:FR:commune". Could you have a look and fix this?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-08-08 12:08:40 UTC | SiiG | Hi,Thanks for this information.We're doing all necessary for the next updates.Thanks, SiiG | |
| 61302491 by ParkerKK | 1 | 2018-08-08 09:06:21 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added 9 ways with strange imported tags like these: bike=No bri_name=SC1 bridle=Yes buckeyetr=Yes l_feet=250.021933922728 l_mile=0.0473526390005167 label_name=SC1 pri_use=Bridle res=South Chagrin Reservation seg_type=CM Hiking surface... |
| 61396725 by wyo | 1 | 2018-08-07 13:26:12 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1366636639There are 2 clearance_width tags.Jan |
| 61409319 by fatoudembele | 1 | 2018-08-07 13:22:07 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you uploaded several relations and ways like this one without any valid tags. Could you check this?Thanks, Jan |
| 61382381 by Зелёный Кошак | 1 | 2018-08-07 10:57:21 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I saw that you added several tags like "name:de:alt" - the correct tag is "alt_name:de", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name |
| 61369953 by rn tech 1 | 1 | 2018-08-06 10:52:26 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added many non-standard tags to these buildings, like these: building:levels_1 = 1 building:levels_2 = 2 building:levels_3 = 3 building_1 = Tandas Perempuan building_2 = Tandas Perempuan building_3 = Tandas PerempuanmIf you want to map features inside a building, pleas... |
| 61244024 by Hendrikklaas | 1 | 2018-08-04 16:59:48 UTC | mueschel | Hi,what does 'strawler' mean? Did you want to write 'stroller'? |
| 61272848 by harrija0 | 1 | 2018-08-04 16:56:43 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the tagging of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612079015What does 'w=no' mean? |
| 2 | 2018-08-04 16:58:03 UTC | harrija0 | Walls. Must have hit tab before it populated. | |
| 61242385 by Gregorio Garretón | 1 | 2018-08-04 16:55:11 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of tags you put on several buildings? propietario = Canepa rol = 23-5 zona PRC = ZCHAL-B zona alturas PRC = V2Please spend some time reading the Wiki or browsing the presets in your editor to learn which tags can be used to describe objects. |
| 61304606 by Accord2 | 1 | 2018-08-03 17:09:08 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added 40 tags like "numeric=maxspeed=120". Could you have a look and fix these? Thanks, Jan |
| 61304629 by Moepswa | 1 | 2018-08-03 17:08:19 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added many objects with tags like Completed=y id=5Could you explain what they mean? Please have a look to the Wiki or the presets in your editor to learn how objects have to be tagged to be usable in OSM.Jan |
| 61308014 by Sowa1980 | 1 | 2018-08-03 17:07:11 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I would like to point out that the correct spelling of "facad" is "facade". Would you mind changing the keys?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-08-07 11:45:05 UTC | Sowa1980 | Спасибо , понял поправлю, спасибо что уточнили, как правильно. | |
| 61229325 by DoktorKalle | 1 | 2018-08-02 19:59:36 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,willkommen bei OSM. Bitte nimm dir etwas Zeit und lese im Wiki, welche Tags Objekte in OSM bekommen müssen, damit sie von jeder Software und anderen Usern verstanden werden. tags wie "typus = bluehwiese" sind nicht dokumentiert und sind deswegen ziemlich nutzlos.Gruß... |
| 61166030 by Mathias-S_import | 1 | 2018-08-02 16:32:34 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5793931032There are several foreign tags and no physical OSM tag.Jan |
| 61259990 by Supaplex | 1 | 2018-08-02 07:34:01 UTC | mueschel | Hi,the tag 'post_box:mouth' is new - could you explain what it means?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-08-02 08:20:23 UTC | Supaplex | If the postbox has two mouth, one for local mailing or outside counties. Or just one mouth for all. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-02 08:47:04 UTC | mueschel | I guess you are looking for post_box:apertures | |
| 61259798 by sydaziz | 1 | 2018-08-02 07:31:21 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please watch out for the correct spelling of keys - they are case sensitive. E.g. 'Water' should be 'water' Could you fix this on 114 objects? Thanks! |
| 2 | 2018-08-02 17:05:23 UTC | user_5359 | Hello, I have modified your keys from Water to water. But please have a look on the three ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612982305 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612982328 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612982315 : You use the key combination natural and highway. A road around the ... | |
| 61269735 by Gregory_M-NCPPC_Import | 1 | 2018-08-02 07:29:38 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the tagging of these objects? Many got a 'saddr:stat' tag.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-08-02 12:40:55 UTC | Gregory_M-NCPPC_Import | Hello,Thanks! most have been a typo when trying to type addr:state. I will fix that asapGregory | |
| 3 | 2018-08-02 12:52:23 UTC | Gregory_M-NCPPC_Import | The tags have been updated in changeset: 61297285Thanks again for bringing this to my attention. | |
| 61218062 by Your Village Maps | 1 | 2018-08-02 07:28:37 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added several long notes to all these objects - this information doesn't belong there, but to the changeset. Could you have a look and remove those tags? E.g.important_note=DigitalGlobe-Standard lines up best and image quality is good; Bing is the most current but does not line up well;... |
| 2 | 2018-08-03 22:16:14 UTC | Your Village Maps | I have taken care of it. | |
| 61234901 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-08-01 00:41:16 UTC | Dr-Mx | Should this tag have been changed to 'wikimedia_commons'? |
| 2 | 2018-08-01 10:29:01 UTC | mueschel | Sure... I corrected so many auto-completion mistakes so I started doing my own. Thanks! | |
| 61096502 by LafarM | 1 | 2018-07-31 16:03:30 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the 'colour' tags on this relation? There's a 'colour:red=...'.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-31 18:24:54 UTC | LafarM | HiThank you. I have modified this tag on correct.Rafa | |
| 61045561 by Spectrokid | 1 | 2018-07-29 12:31:38 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the name of this farm?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/610692055Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-30 12:22:37 UTC | Spectrokid | It matches the name SDFE gives, but I don't have local knowledge. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-30 14:36:05 UTC | mueschel | Have a closer look, there is no name tag, just something that went wrong during copy and paste. | |
| 4 | 2018-08-01 06:18:16 UTC | Spectrokid | fixed | |
| 61061615 by DoctorSpeck | 1 | 2018-07-29 12:26:10 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added 2 ways with only foreign tags - could you check that? E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/610846391Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-31 08:05:10 UTC | DoctorSpeck | Thanks for the heads up.Fixed in changeset below:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61219011 | |
| 61020177 by 5R-MFT | 1 | 2018-07-29 12:22:57 UTC | mueschel | Hi, could you check the tagging? 'adjust=2' looks like a mistake.Jan |
| 61150718 by flierfy | 1 | 2018-07-29 12:06:33 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added sevetal tags like gauge:proposed here. 'proposed' is used as a Prefix, like 'proposed:gauge', but not as a suffix. Could you have a look and change these tags?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-29 12:32:13 UTC | flierfy | Thank you for this hint. I just changed it.With regards,Stephan | |
| 61016004 by PT-53 | 1 | 2018-07-28 15:57:41 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,schaust du diese Wege nochmal an? Der richtige Key ist 'maxspeed:type', nicht 'type:maxspeed'.Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-28 17:01:17 UTC | PT-53 | Hallo Jan,da habe ich wohl etwas verdeht.Habe es "gedreht".Danke und Grüße | |
| 61122877 by xztraz | 1 | 2018-07-28 15:31:56 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please don't add any tags like "hashtags" to any object in OSM. Could you have a look and remove them?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-30 18:07:22 UTC | xztraz | yeah. got it wrong. i cant find the tags so someone seem to have fixed that. is there a way to add a atag to achangeset afterwards its pushed? did a lot of drawing but missed the detail about adding the tag to the changeset. | |
| 60954240 by nw520 | 1 | 2018-07-27 19:09:21 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag 'traffic_signals:a' twice - could you check that? |
| 2 | 2018-07-27 20:59:51 UTC | nw520 | Hello,actually I added these tags on purpose since I wanted to indicate that these traffic signals have a "Angemeldet" indicator for busses (https://www.nordbayerischer-kurier.de/sites/default/files/user_uploads/051016wittek.006.bushaltestelle.jpg_0.jpg). I'm not sure whether there's alr... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-28 14:13:18 UTC | mueschel | Hallo, verstehe. Allerdings sollte ein Key erklärend sein und nicht ganz so kryptisch. Außerdem sollte er nicht vom Symbol abhängen. Anderswo wird ein S oder ein blauer oder weißer Punkt verwendet. Bis jetzt gibt es da noch kein Tag dafür. Wenn du allgemein angeben wills... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-28 14:41:01 UTC | nw520 | An einem traffic_signals:bus=yes würde mich stören, dass dieser Tag nicht spezifisch genug wäre und auch zu einer Busampel passen könnte. Könntest Du mir vielleicht Deine Meinung zu diesen vorläufigen Vorschlägen geben:a) traffic_signals:bus=yes - ganz allgemein,... | |
| 5 | 2018-07-28 15:30:24 UTC | mueschel | c und e sind, denke ich, in Ordnung. Allerdings gefällt mir das "signed_in" nicht wirklich. Vielleicht eher etwas wie "override_indicator"? Es geht ja nicht um das Anmelden, sondern um die Beeinflussung des Ampelzyklus. Oder irgendetwas im Sinne von "Vorrang"? | |
| 6 | 2018-07-28 16:38:10 UTC | nw520 | Okay, danke schön. Ich übernehme dann soweit traffic_signals:bus:override_indicator=white_s für die bestehenden 2 Vorkommnisse. Demnächst müsste ich wohl dann auch in der Mail-Liste oder im Wiki ein Proposal starten. | |
| 7 | 2018-07-28 16:43:07 UTC | nw520 | Pardon, meinte natürlich traffic_signals:bus:override_indicator=white_a | |
| 8 | 2018-07-28 16:50:15 UTC | nw520 | Overpass-Abfrage: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ACS | |
| 60959722 by michalfabik | 1 | 2018-07-27 19:14:13 UTC | mueschel | Could you check the tags on this plane?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5777579564 |
| 2 | 2018-07-27 20:33:32 UTC | michalfabik | Fixed. Thanks for pointing it out. | |
| 60924654 by mike9531 | 1 | 2018-07-27 19:01:29 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you uploaded several residential areas with strange keys like 'Pro_Code'. Could you check and fix that?Jan |
| 61087363 by Maddie Back | 1 | 2018-07-27 15:52:00 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM! Please take your time to learn about common tags in OSM. You used for example "Room", "Room #", "Room Type", "room type" - all of these are not documented and not usable by any software.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-27 17:03:36 UTC | user_5359 | Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_Mapping#Tagging ! Don't add new keys for room number (see ref). And are all rooms on the same level? | |
| 60896406 by jendrusk | 1 | 2018-07-25 10:27:49 UTC | mueschel | Hi,these nodes all have two strange tags:src_send_d=2018-07-19_09-55-31src_sender=546I guess these where uploaded by mistake?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 10:37:56 UTC | jendrusk | Hi JanThey were not :)Objects were collected and sent to me using foreign software (StrazakOSM) - those are date of receiving and anonimized user - kind of foreign key for me. If something is wrong with this data I can find where they came from.Cheers, Andy | |
| 3 | 2018-07-25 10:41:50 UTC | mueschel | Hi Andy,in general, such personal information that is not useful for anybody else should not be part of the tags of a node. You can add this information to the changeset - you can still search for this information but it doesn't bloat the main objects database. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-25 10:54:37 UTC | jendrusk | Yes, I know and I have to think out something else, but as for now that's how this software works. I'll change it if I'll have some free time. | |
| 5 | 2018-07-25 11:09:33 UTC | mueschel | Ok. How about changing to a normal "source:XYZ" tag then? 'src_' is not used for anything else in OSM. | |
| 6 | 2018-07-25 11:14:52 UTC | jendrusk | Yes, it will be prettier and good solution for walkaround but still it will be "personal information that is not useful for anybody else". I have to face it my side - maybe by adding osm id's to my objects... | |
| 60842194 by Toni Serra | 1 | 2018-07-24 13:40:10 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of the tags like "Cal Tacanet = Graves i excavacions Castellot SA" you added? These are not common, maybe we can find a documented tag to describe these features?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-25 09:41:43 UTC | Toni Serra | HiIt is a mistake, it is corrected. Thank you | |
| 3 | 2018-07-25 10:24:22 UTC | mueschel | Perfect. Here's a second one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608985481 | |
| 50947147 by ElliottPlack | 1 | 2017-08-14 11:35:09 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of 'eruv' on this way?http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513968801Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2017-08-14 14:56:41 UTC | ElliottPlack | Jan,Sure, an eruv is a physical object that serves as a symbolic boundary in the Jewish Orthodox faith. Read more:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EruvThere isn't a great tag for this yet on OSM, so I added this under the premise of the "Any tags you like" principle (http://wiki.opens... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-14 15:13:16 UTC | mueschel | Alright, I haven't seen this before.I see one potential problem with the tagging: A barrier=* implies an access restriction, by default access=no. So, if anybody by mistake adds a common node with any highway, routing engines might think traffic is blocked. I don't think we have a proper tagging... | |
| 4 | 2017-08-15 02:48:02 UTC | ElliottPlack | Jan: I'm glad that you found this and commented. I think your idea is superb. I was trying to decide if I should use an existing key like barrier but you make a good point that it could be interpreted by a routing engine as a generic barrier. Better to start something totally fresh.What do you t... | |
| 5 | 2017-08-15 18:42:39 UTC | mueschel | ':' versus '_' - there is no functional difference between the two. Usually, ':' is used for subkeys, e.g. a key that further describes the main key, e.g. 'capacity' and the more specific 'capacity:disabled'. The underscore is more used like a replacement for a space as in "internet_access"... | |
| 6 | 2018-07-24 13:20:07 UTC | ElliottPlack | Thinking back on this, what do you think about having eruv=rope, eruv=wire, versus eruv=yes paired with eruv:type=rope or wire. Tags like barrier and highway have their 'type' as the tag name. | |
| 7 | 2018-07-25 06:58:41 UTC | mueschel | Hi Elliott, this should be fine too. You can still add tags like "eruv:something = this" later on if you feel a need to add more details. | |
| 61027840 by Олег 2199 | 1 | 2018-07-25 06:43:04 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the tagging of these hydrants? They got several tags in Russian instead of the normal English ones, for example:Инв. номер=863Информация=ОтсутствуетПЧ, в чьём районе:=RU-KHA-21-99Собственник=Завод алюминие... |
| 60819527 by samuelrussell | 1 | 2018-07-24 13:48:31 UTC | mueschel | Hi,these 'accepts' tags are new. I guess one of them can be changed to 'capacity' and one more to 'count'. For deposit return machines we do have a vending_machine tag:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending=bottle_returnCheers, Jan |
| 61000603 by yopaseopor+catastro | 1 | 2018-07-24 10:32:22 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain those "2017:" tags on this area?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/214787644/historyIt's not common to put a year in front of any tag. If the parking is gone, the tags can be deleted. If it's important information, the "was:" prefix could be used. |
| 2 | 2018-07-24 12:22:19 UTC | yopaseopor | It is easy, it is like the was prefix but with the exact information of year. It is important because this fact will change the life of all the city (this was the only free fee parking beach and it is well-know from about all the region). Even there is some TV program with the new beauty beach zone.... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-24 12:54:16 UTC | mueschel | This scheme is undocumented and introduces a huge amount of new keys with impact on all data users. Please make a proposal for this new scheme and get the opinions of other mappers. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-24 12:59:25 UTC | user_5359 | Please have a look on taginfo https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=2017 . There are guys with the same idea of a timeline, but they use the date as a postfix. | |
| 60956026 by escada | 1 | 2018-07-23 12:57:42 UTC | mueschel | Hi,all these strange tags on this school look like a mistake: HN_MAX = 12.21 HN_P99 = 11.13 H_DSM_MAX = 34.57 H_DSM_P99 = 33.49 H_DTM_GEM = 22.36 H_DTM_MIN = 22.11 auto_building = school detection_method = from existing OSM building source: school ,hits (1) size_grb_bu... |
| 2 | 2018-07-24 03:40:12 UTC | escada | Hallo Jan,it's indeed a mistake, I removed them. Thanks for letting me know !regards | |
| 60922834 by Justin Taylor | 1 | 2018-07-23 12:43:17 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you uploaded several boundaries with just foreign tags - could you have a look and fix these tags?E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/609649838Thanks, Jan |
| 60839192 by Sint E7 | 1 | 2018-07-21 10:18:51 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check your "zone:De Lijn" keys (and similar ones)? The correct spellin is "De_Lijn" with an underscore instead of the space.Cheers, Jan |
| 60862852 by Juline LEBRUN | 1 | 2018-07-21 10:17:30 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please have a look to the Wiki to see how sports pitches have to be tagged. For example, you used:Sport =SoccerThe correct tagging would be: leisure=pitch sport=soccerhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sportCheers, Jan |
| 60891294 by momo14 | 1 | 2018-07-21 10:09:13 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you have a look to these address tags? I doubt that the village / zones are really called "Other" here.addr:settlement=Otheraddr:zone=Otheraddr_settlement_other=Palorinyaaddr_zone_other=Zone 1Cheers, Jan |
| 60892075 by momo14 | 1 | 2018-07-21 10:07:19 UTC | mueschel | Hi,in this import you used several unusual tags which should be replaced by documented tags. For example:addr:settlement -> addr:villagechambers -> toilets:num_chamberssource_version -> sourcegender_use -> female, male, unisexWould you mind changing these tags to make thi... |
| 60715212 by Nodrog1061 | 1 | 2018-07-18 10:33:03 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added the tag "left only" on this way - what is the meaning of this?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15422269Cheers, Jan |
| 60780055 by andresaldas | 1 | 2018-07-18 09:58:22 UTC | mueschel | Hi,In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. In addition, the spelling of tags has to be right - the slightest spelling mistake makes the data unusable.Tags like "tiempo" and "estado agriet... |
| 60805503 by xcs1230 | 1 | 2018-07-18 09:43:55 UTC | mueschel | Please don't use the OSM database for testing - this data is used by many people world-wide and is not the right place to make any experiments. Please use the development database for this:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing |
| 60794571 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-07-17 12:59:27 UTC | czubi | Hallo mueschel,nur mal rein Interesse halber, war das vorher falsch oder war es unüblich oder ...? |
| 2 | 2018-07-17 13:34:16 UTC | mueschel | Hi,'razed' wird als Prefix verwendet, nicht als Suffix. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefixTechnisch gesehen wäre "razed:watermill" also korrekt. Da dieses Tag aber höchstwahrscheinlich so exotisch ist, dass es kaum einer auswertet habe ich mich für da... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-21 09:07:38 UTC | czubi | pefix... ja klar... Danke für's einbessern. | |
| 60721009 by vorpalblade77 | 1 | 2018-07-17 10:39:17 UTC | mueschel | Hi,in the revert you re-added several tags with spelling mistakes:state:rout,state:route,state_routeShould we change them to one common spelling? What is the meaning of these?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-17 11:29:50 UTC | vorpalblade77 | Honestly, when I was reverting 57870860, I just kept the tags that were existed prior to that changeset and any tags that existed in that changeset that didn't conflict.It looks like they can be removed, since they are the only existences of those tags. | |
| 60699367 by ansuta | 1 | 2018-07-17 10:30:42 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added 2 "building:levels:undergorund" tags here - could you check which one is right?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61589560Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-17 12:49:10 UTC | ansuta | Hi. I took the Spanish Cadastre information and now I see that forgot to delete the tag 1 "building:levels:undergorund". Anyway, when I go to the hospital (I visit it regularly) I'll see better. Thanks for your feedback. | |
| 60586004 by SSR_317 | 1 | 2018-07-15 11:56:06 UTC | mueschel | Hi,the tag "bridge=truss", "truss=..." are not common. There is another approach for tagging these traffic signs already in use (2000 times):man_made = gantrygantry:type = ...There is no proper documentation available, but at least it is in use.https://wiki.openstre... |
| 59642929 by Manjurul Islam | 1 | 2018-07-15 11:41:33 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added several objects with just one tag:"CDRT=yes". Could you explain what this means?Thanks, Jan |
| 60578253 by marc1978 | 1 | 2018-07-11 13:45:04 UTC | dikkeknodel | Hallo Marc,Ich schaue mir deine Änderungen an weil du ein Review gefragt hasst. Ich denke das seht gut aus. Normalerweise würde ich auch ein Parkplatz bei ein Ladegerät erwarten. Soll dort vielleicht auch noch ein Parkplatz gezeichnet werden?Liebe Grüsse,dikkeknodel |
| 2 | 2018-07-15 11:24:05 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,die Arten der Stecker die du hier und in anderen Changesets verwendest sind nicht die in OSM üblichen Namen. Schau doch mal bitte ins Wiki und übernimm die Namen von dort:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:socketGruß, Jan | |
| 60707791 by clementroux | 1 | 2018-07-15 11:01:12 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added the key "charging_type" on these nodes - this tag is new and not used in other places. Essentially this information is not needed, because it can be read from the "output" tag. On the other hand, one important piece of information is missing: Which sockets are ... |
| 2 | 2018-07-17 09:53:00 UTC | clementroux | Hi,I forgot to say it, but this was a semi-automatic changeset from opendata source. So I don't have other information about the sockets. I tried to "translate" all the present tags from the original dataset, this is why I added the charging_type tag (I didn't notice that it was readabl... | |
| 60691709 by RoadWarrier | 1 | 2018-07-15 10:59:44 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added the key 'isin' on 126 buildings. Is that "is_in:city"? But there is also an "addr:city" which is different. Could you have a look?Jan |
| 60621642 by cammace | 1 | 2018-07-12 09:25:40 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of the tag "tract_geoid=48201311700" you added on 850 buildings? This looks like a mistake to me.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-12 13:08:53 UTC | cammace | The building geometries came from the Bing Buildings footprint. I specifically used the files produced in this process https://gist.github.com/iandees/a5ab382a13099bfad615d213ec588e6a. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-12 13:16:46 UTC | mueschel | The geometries look fine, but I think that this tag shouldn't be there. | |
| 57308071 by willmmm | 1 | 2018-07-12 11:47:46 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please don't add 5 landuse and 7 leisure tags to the same object - this is not how OSM works. If you want to add e.g. a baseball court, you have to add an additional object for this and use the tags that are defined in the wiki.Jan |
| 60469414 by Geodyn | 1 | 2018-07-12 10:53:24 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way? The tag "ref:fr:" looks like a mistake.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605638611Cheers, Jan |
| 60624005 by lmason_aph | 1 | 2018-07-12 09:29:16 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found the key "indoormark:" 123 times in these edits - note the ':' in the key. I guess you wanted to use "indoormark" without the ':'. Could you have a look and fix this?Cheers, Jan |
| 60528988 by A~nest | 1 | 2018-07-12 09:27:36 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added tags like "osmid=535911046" on many buildings. This looks like a mistake. Could you have a look and fix these issues?Thanks, Jan |
| 60599345 by mspray3 | 1 | 2018-07-12 09:27:11 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added tags like "osmid=535911046" on many buildings. This looks like a mistake. Could you have a look and fix these issues?Thanks, Jan |
| 60634492 by Reynald0 | 1 | 2018-07-12 09:23:40 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM. In your edits I saw many tags that are not common. Please have a look to the Wiki and learn about which tags can be used to describe objects. Only then the information is usable by any kind of software. Also, please take care about the spelling - this is very important. I found ... |
| 60574138 by mspray9 | 1 | 2018-07-12 09:20:24 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I noticed a spelling mistake on these objects: The key is "building", not "biuilding".Please have a look and fix these 648 objects.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-12 13:06:43 UTC | mspray9 | Hi Jan, Thanks for flagging this. The typo has been corrected. Cheers! | |
| 60545121 by gadacz | 1 | 2018-07-09 17:15:44 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,hast du eine Genehmigung die Daten dieser Seite für OSM zu verwenden? Ich kann keinen Hinweis auf Nutzungsbedingungen finden.Kurzzeitige Sperrungen (hier nicht mal 2 Monate) sollten auch nicht durch Änderungen der access-Tags eingetragen werden, sondern z.B. mit https://wiki.op... |
| 2 | 2018-07-10 04:41:03 UTC | gadacz | Danke für den Hinweis. Gerade weil ich zum Verfahren unsicher war, habe ich Prüfung erbeten. Die Daten zu den Baustelleb werden über diverse Medien/Portale vom Bundesverkehrsministerion via BAST herausgegeben.Danke for den Hinweis auf "temporary" Genau das habe ich gesucht... | |
| 60450145 by ggando_lyft | 1 | 2018-07-09 15:59:50 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found several wrong tags regarding lanes here and on other streets.E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/417198049- If there is only one lane in forward direction, turn:lanes:forward = left| can't be right, because this implies two lanes (unless there is something like a bicycle lane)\... |
| 2 | 2018-07-09 21:37:15 UTC | ggando_lyft | Hi Jan, Thank you so much for your feedback. I have made the necessary changes and am reviewing my past lane tag edits to ensure that they are properly tagged. Thank you again for your feedback I appreciate the ability to create the highest quality contributions to OSM. Best regards, G... | |
| 60334944 by Ajmal Takhnikyar | 1 | 2018-07-09 10:43:07 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used tags like these (here and on other roads)carriageway width, carriagewaycamber, carriagewaywidth, These are no common tags - could you explain what they mean? Maybe we can find a common way to tag those features.Cheers, Jan |
| 60420220 by mattmaxon | 1 | 2018-07-08 11:55:51 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "lanes:center" on few roads. This tag is not used in other places.If there is a center turn lane, this is commonly tagged as lanes:both_ways = 1turn:lanes:both_ways = leftCheers, Jan |
| 60080140 by christian shadrack | 1 | 2018-06-23 16:52:52 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this looks like an import of at least 82 schools.The source you give ("ESRI") is obviously wrong. Where can we find the obligatory description of this import?Also, all these nodes have many strange tags which don't look like they belong in the OSM database like these: Capac... |
| 2 | 2018-07-08 11:52:14 UTC | mueschel | I removed those tags and fixed the spelling of e.g. "source". https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60507474 | |
| 60459502 by A~nest | 1 | 2018-07-06 10:41:20 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added keys like "osmid=535929240" on many objects. Could you check this? This tag looks like a mistake.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-06 11:26:00 UTC | A~nest | HI Jan,Thanks for the heads up. Those were by mistake yes. Is there an easy fix than reverting the whole changeset? The updates being made are from field data collection and is mainly to update the building tags based on what was found on the ground. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-06 11:38:57 UTC | mueschel | Sure: use overpass-turbo to create a query for these tags, then load this in JOSM and edit the tags.Here's the query: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/A72Then just click on 'Export' -> 'JOSM'. | |
| 60435250 by Bert Araali | 1 | 2018-07-06 10:39:35 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added the tag "buiulding:part" on 74 ways, could you fix the spelling of "building"?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-06 10:51:07 UTC | Bert Araali | Hi Jan, sorry for the mistake. Typo, will correct them imediatly. Could you help me in detecting those typo's ? I am using ID and JOSM but neither warns me about typo's when editing or uploading. What tool do you use ? | |
| 3 | 2018-07-06 10:58:49 UTC | mueschel | It's difficult to warn about spelling mistakes as there is no constraint on which keys you might use. I'm using a list of new keys that weren't used before based on Taginfo:http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm | |
| 4 | 2018-07-06 13:16:21 UTC | Bert Araali | Thanks Jan, could help. Would be great if someone just adds some warnings to the validation rules for new tags added.Typos are corrected. | |
| 60325410 by Lyaza | 1 | 2018-07-05 10:56:07 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found 10 buildings with tags like "77 = 61", e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294213731Could you have a look and fix this?Cheers, Jan |
| 60267291 by samuelrussell | 1 | 2018-07-04 15:07:37 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain what a "beg_button" is? Did you mean "button_operated"?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-14 06:49:16 UTC | samuelrussell | Sorry, yes that's correct | |
| 60263940 by stosh77 | 1 | 2018-07-04 15:05:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this phone got two "covered" tags, could you check which one is right?Cheers, Jan |
| 60280716 by JRGP | 1 | 2018-07-04 15:03:19 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you please check the tags on this and several other landuses? The tags you used are not common. Only those tags described in the Wiki can be understood and used by any kind of software - other data is just 'invisible'. Ciudad = Guayaquil Ciudadela = Bellavista Codigo Postal = 0... |
| 60398184 by Maria Christine | 1 | 2018-07-04 14:12:47 UTC | mueschel | Hi, welcome to OSM!I found some non-standard tags in your edit, for example "building roof". The correct spelling is "building:roof". Please make sure you check all edits for such spelling mistakes - any error results in data that can't be understood by any software and e.g. ... |
| 60376214 by fondolucy | 1 | 2018-07-04 14:09:52 UTC | mueschel | Hi,there are again many non-standard tags in this edit - did you read the advice given by Frederik some months ago? https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1981 |
| 60288778 by InfosReseaux | 1 | 2018-07-03 13:16:28 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "lins = bay" on several power lines - could you check that?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-04 21:27:04 UTC | InfosReseaux | Thank you to have noticed this !It was an unfortunate typo.A further changeset will move all those bogus ways to line=bay | |
| 60255695 by laurent eau | 1 | 2018-07-03 10:57:34 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please have a look to the Wiki to learn about common tags - only those described in the Wiki can be understood by other users and software. E.g. "currency:Bitcoin" is not defined and should be currency:XBT.See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:currency |
| 60223313 by zokert | 1 | 2018-07-01 17:53:53 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the tagging of this node? Looks like some kind of mistake:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5723606955Cheers, Jan |
| 60209064 by Mateusz Konieczny | 1 | 2018-07-01 16:47:39 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you decide on one version of the tag? Now we have "still_visible_on", "visible_in" and "visible_on". |
| 2 | 2018-07-05 08:19:52 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | If that is really problematic for you - feel free to migrate them to one tag (or even note of you really want to do that, but please keep it readable) | |
| 60321997 by KanadierImQuadrat | 1 | 2018-07-01 16:40:32 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,in diesem Fall ist das Aufteilen in zwei Spuren wegen der großen Sperrflächen durchaus in Ordnung. Generell sollte man solche Teilungen aber nur dann machen, wenn Straßen wirklich baulich getrennt sind. Das ist auch ein Kritikpunkt: Der Weg für die Linksabbieger beginnt... |
| 60040229 by Mike Baggaley | 1 | 2018-06-27 11:17:03 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of "foot:closed = permissive"? If access by foot is not permitted, the tag is "foot=no".Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-27 14:49:21 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi Jan, this was an attempt to retain the permissive value for foot whilst also indicating that the path was closed (access=no). This seemed better than simply removing the foot tag. If you can find a better way to show that pedestrian access is permissive but currently not allowed I would be please... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-30 16:48:30 UTC | mueschel | For temporary closed ways, we have the "temporary:" prefix -> temporary:access = no.You can also just add a note explaining what the access rules will be after reconstruction. | |
| 60149870 by geotom | 1 | 2018-06-30 10:31:16 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,bitte schau mal nach der Rechtschreibung in deinen Keys - es heißt "length", nicht "lenght".Gruß, Jan |
| 60111506 by cat_crash | 1 | 2018-06-24 14:59:41 UTC | mueschel | Hi,these edits on ~100 stores look a lot like an edit for SEO. You're introducing many new tags, don't add any source of the information.Please spend some time to change all these POIs to use common tags like they are described in the Wiki. |
| 2 | 2018-06-27 08:27:26 UTC | freebeer | also, what do the fields like copyrights=AAP and google_id have to do with the OSM requirements for non-encumbered data?It seems the source of the data is tainted or not allowable, and here I would suggest a revert to v2, considering I could not find useful licence info about mapk.in with a google... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-27 11:02:03 UTC | cat_crash | Why you have decided that it is encumbered data? | |
| 4 | 2018-06-30 10:29:28 UTC | mueschel | - The source you added is not a valid URL, we can not check it.- You added a "copyrights" tag, which implies non-conformity with ODbL- most of the tags you added do not follow any established tagging schemesThere are at least 16 shops that should be reverted in my opinion. The info... | |
| 5 | 2018-07-04 13:33:23 UTC | cat_crash | 1) any references how "validation" process looks like? Actualy I'm owner of mentioned mapk.in resource 2) I do. 3) All non-compliant tags were removed in next update Any other concerns? | |
| 60281140 by JRGP | 1 | 2018-06-30 10:23:13 UTC | mueschel | Hi,on this area you used some strange tags:Ciudad=GuayaquilCiudadela=BellavistaCódigo Postal=090603Etapa=4taManzana=63Nombre=Ciudadela Bellavista, 4ta Etapa, Manzana 63This might be a good description of the object,but is not usable in OSM - no software can understandit.... |
| 60077030 by michaelinredhill | 1 | 2018-06-29 10:40:05 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600771620caps lock and auto-completion don't combine well. |
| 60260625 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-06-28 23:07:43 UTC | Enock4seth | This looks suspicious as Paypal is not an accepted means of payment in Ghana. Can you confirm data source? I've also sent an email to confirm. Best. |
| 2 | 2018-06-28 23:37:22 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this information was added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60160657I just fixed the spelling of the tag. | |
| 3 | 2018-06-29 08:25:28 UTC | Enock4seth | My bad I should have checked history well. Sorry and thanks :) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60260625 | |
| 60208761 by freeExec | 1 | 2018-06-27 17:53:29 UTC | mueschel | Hi,on these buildings I saw several keys with spaces in them like "building use" (should be building:use) and "wall: material" (wall:material). Could you have a look and fix these spelling mistakes?Jan |
| 60192314 by ockim16 | 1 | 2018-06-27 17:51:52 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added two relations without any useful tag on them. Could you check these two, remove the imported foreign tags and add common OSM tags?Thanks, Jan |
| 60034878 by LuSirto | 1 | 2018-06-27 11:15:55 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "heavy_equipment = destination" here - this tag is new. What is the definition of "heavy_equipment"?Jan |
| 60167901 by Jordanligutom | 1 | 2018-06-27 11:05:25 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found several tags with spelling mistakes. Please make sure that the spelling of all tags is correct - otherwise no software can understand them. Would you mind having a look and fix these issues? Example:"roof: material" -> "roof:material"... and several other, sim... |
| 59802132 by Laurent Magréault | 1 | 2018-06-22 09:53:35 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the key "socket:typee" which looks like a mistake. Could you check what the right socket type is?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-26 19:14:06 UTC | Laurent Magréault | Hi,There is 16 charging station with this socket type in France. Key is detailed on the french osm wiki page : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station. Type E is a domestic socket in France : https://www.worldstandards.eu/electricity/plugs-and-sockets/Laurent | |
| 3 | 2018-06-26 20:34:16 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you're right, the tag is new, but correct. Would you mind adding it on the wiki page for sockets?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket | |
| 4 | 2018-06-28 15:49:22 UTC | Laurent Magréault | Ok. Done. | |
| 60120911 by Alibaer | 1 | 2018-06-24 17:59:21 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,dürfen hier wirklich nur Fußgänger, Radfahrer und Pferde durch? Keine forst/landwirtschaftlichen Fahrzeuge?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-25 10:11:37 UTC | Alibaer | Auf diese genaue Unterscheidung habe ich bisher noch nicht so genau geachtet. Mir war nur klar, dass anders als bisher in der OSM dort keine PKWs durchfahren dürfen. Sicher dürfen forstwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge durch. Bei der nächsten Fahrt dort (evtl. schon heute) schau ich mal, ob e... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-25 21:14:46 UTC | Alibaer | War heute auf dieser Strecke. Durchfahrt ist für Autos und Motorräder verboten, Forst- und landwirschaftliche Fahrzeuge frei. Werde es ändern. | |
| 4 | 2018-06-26 09:39:08 UTC | Alibaer | Wollte den Eintrag ändern, klappt aber mit den Vorgaben auf der Bearbeitenseite nicht. Für den Wegabschnitt gibt es auf beiden Seiten ein Verbotsschild 260 (oben Auto, unten Motorradfahrer), darunter, dass forstwirtschaftliche und landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge erlaubt sind. Vielleicht kann... | |
| 5 | 2018-06-26 11:19:10 UTC | mueschel | Dafür gibt es dieses praktische Tool:http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=260,1026-38 | |
| 33819814 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-06-25 17:04:41 UTC | luschi | Hallo, kleine Frage am Rande: hier hast du einen Wegweiser in Österreich erfasst(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2399730302) mit "material=metal". Laut meinen Information sind die Schilder aber aus Aluminium wegen der längeren Haltbarkeit. sollte es da... |
| 2 | 2018-06-25 17:11:25 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,"metal" als Oberbegriff (Aluminium ist ja auch ein Metall) ist durchaus gängig. Wenn du es genauer weißt, kannst du das gerne ändern. Das gleiche gibt es ja auch bei Tags wie "surface": "paved" als grobe Einordnung, das bei genauerer Kenntnis ers... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-25 17:45:34 UTC | luschi | Hallo, danke für die schnelle Antwort. Deine Erklärung macht durchaus Sinn. Wobei ich der Meinung bin, dass wir es so genau wie Möglich erfassen sollten, da wir die Möglichkeit dazu haben, egal ob ein Tool oder eine App nachher damit ein Problem hat. Ich w... | |
| 59987720 by Hasbro2 | 1 | 2018-06-25 10:56:09 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,kannst du hier mal nach den maxspeed-Tags schauen? Da sind zwei sich widersprechende.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243274570 |
| 60108229 by cabinetcourbi | 1 | 2018-06-25 10:46:21 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you're using the key "traffic_signal" on many nodes, the correct key would be "traffic_sign".Could you have a look and fix this?Jan |
| 60136241 by JLZIMMERMANN | 1 | 2018-06-25 10:44:30 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I saw that you added the tag "traffic_signal = E53c" on several nodes - the correct key is "traffic_sign". Could you have a look and fix this?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-25 16:31:29 UTC | JLZIMMERMANN | Hello,Thanks for the warning. I changed the mission here https://pic4review.pavie.info/#/mission/231/reviewI'll modify all the dirty tags.RegardsJean-Louis | |
| 59925251 by EriGonzalez | 1 | 2018-06-24 14:42:02 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please watch out for the correct spelling of tags: it's "landcover", not "lancover".Cheers, Jan |
| 60110463 by SSR_317 | 1 | 2018-06-24 13:55:22 UTC | mueschel | Hi,tags like "fut_ref_1" are not common. You could use "proposed:ref = I-69;IN 37" instead.Cheers, Jan |
| 60096991 by rado raoilitinasoa | 1 | 2018-06-24 13:53:43 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please watch out for the spelling of tags - it's "highway", not "hidghway".Jan |
| 60095527 by Valiha Tiava | 1 | 2018-06-24 13:53:12 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please watch out for the spelling of tags - it's "highway", not 'hidhway'.Cheers, Jan |
| 60049024 by KanaLee | 1 | 2018-06-23 17:17:48 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the tag "tm_data" you added on these nodes?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-25 16:17:17 UTC | KanaLee | Hi Jan,My bad. The tag was applied in error and has been removed. I will be modifying my workflow to ensure that incorrect tags are not applied in the future.Thank you,Kana | |
| 60082612 by gwbpt | 1 | 2018-06-23 16:44:29 UTC | mueschel | Could you please check this import? It created hundreds of areas with foreign tags, that don't look like they should appear in the OSM database, like the ones below. commune=78117 contenance=6521 created=2007-02-21 id=78117000AK0068 numero=68 prefixe=000 section=AK... |
| 59869931 by cxc | 1 | 2018-06-22 11:13:59 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of the tags route_id and shape_id ? These are not used on other bus routes.Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-22 13:53:36 UTC | cxc | Ciao,Sorry for my bad english…I take the route from gtfs data from this link… I take this from this link (I see now than update 19/06/2018… I hope it's better the last one) http://dati.toscana.it/dataset/rt-oraritb/resource/fa9e9254-4fdc-44bb-b9fc-f3103a8a3781I wanted to... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-22 13:58:01 UTC | mueschel | Hi,the cc-by license of this data is incompatible with ODbL. This data must not be used in OSM, unless you have a written permission to use it. | |
| 4 | 2018-06-22 14:52:19 UTC | cxc | http://open.toscana.it/??? | |
| 5 | 2018-06-22 15:33:16 UTC | mueschel | Take the link "Privacy e note legali" and scroll to the last paragraph - the license is cc-by, which is an "open license", but not compatible to ODbL - we can't guarantee that the attribution is always kept along with the data. | |
| 6 | 2018-06-22 15:43:22 UTC | cxc | ok... I sent an email to info@open.toscana.it ... if the answer will be negative I delete everything ... I'm sorry for the inconvenience!ciao | |
| 7 | 2018-06-22 15:45:13 UTC | cxc | Buonasera,Scrivo in merito ai dati contenuti nel sitohttp://open.toscana.it/In particolare :Scarica i nostri open data e usali come vuoi. Se non li trovi, chiediceli. Trasparenza, facilità di accesso, possibilità di interloquire con noi. Open data: una ricchezza a dis... | |
| 59770138 by Javier Sanchez (imports) | 1 | 2018-06-22 09:50:42 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way? The key "Agroten" looks like a mistake.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596835820 |
| 2 | 2018-06-22 13:46:47 UTC | Javier Sanchez | Fixed. Thank you! | |
| 54674111 by cabinetcourbi | 1 | 2017-12-16 11:16:39 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like you imported a lot of data for hotels here. Unfortunately, some of the tagging is wrong:E.g. here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2428498001- add:postcode should be addr:postcode- there is no "award" tag, the proposal has been rejected- 'stars' should only c... |
| 2 | 2017-12-20 11:57:47 UTC | mueschel | Is there any chance that this will get cleaned up? If not, I opt for reverting this import. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-20 13:43:37 UTC | JLZIMMERMANN | Hello,I work also on this changeset, we need a little time. We are working on an experimentation to improve tourism objects in this area of France. this is why you saw some odd tags. Thanks for your suggestions.RegardsJean-Louis | |
| 4 | 2017-12-23 10:36:51 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Sorry, but the live and production database of OSM isn't the right place for "experimentation", right? Please have a look athttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_the_dev_server | |
| 5 | 2018-06-22 09:16:29 UTC | mueschel | It's now six months since you asked for "a little time". Is there actually anybody working on this? Many people are fixing some bits of this every now and then, but the vast majority of mistakes is still there. | |
| 59859739 by Pemu | 1 | 2018-06-21 18:10:25 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,eine Relation wie diese, die das Wenden auf einem geraden Stück Straße verbietet, ist nicht nötig - sonst müsste man das ja auf jeder Straße einfügen. Schau dir mal die Tags "overtaking" und "change" an - für das Erlauben von Ü... |
| 59923106 by Vladimír Domes | 1 | 2018-06-20 19:49:03 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I noticed this changeset because you introduced several new keys like "service:bicycle:rental:opening_hours", which are not used in other places. But the tagging seems strange - you tagged it as bicycle_parking, but it seems to be a station for rental bikes. Could you clarify this? |
| 2 | 2018-06-21 08:33:38 UTC | Vladimír Domes | Hi, Yes I can.Rekola bikesharing company is new in Ostrava city. They use threir own bicycle stands and also existing stands (bicycle_parking).Firstly I tagged their own stands as bicycle_rental, but we have talk in our Czech community (https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz/c2497) and I changed bicy... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-21 09:12:33 UTC | mueschel | Hi Vladimir,this makes sense, it just wasn't obvious from the tagging.Nevertheless,I would suggest to have two nodes, one for the parking, one for the rental. This doesn't represent that there is actually just one object, but:The very long keys like "service:bicycle:rental:opening_h... | |
| 59990537 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-06-19 20:56:57 UTC | Hjart | Ok, maybe this one should have been documented a bit better: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AutoAWS#autoAWS_0.3_rc1 |
| 2 | 2018-06-19 20:59:45 UTC | mueschel | Sorry, I overlooked this - a Google search for "autoaws osm" didn't show something relevant.I added it again: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59990763 | |
| 3 | 2018-06-20 22:15:02 UTC | Hjart | I'll recommend you search directly on the OSM wiki | |
| 4 | 2018-06-20 22:35:20 UTC | mueschel | Unfortunately this would miss discussions and "documentation" that is only in the mailing lists or forums - many people just don't use the Wiki. | |
| 59738023 by Mirasolera | 1 | 2018-06-20 11:30:38 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found 5 ways like this one with only foreign tags. Could you check these?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596471297Thanks, Jan |
| 59675549 by xinot | 1 | 2018-06-20 11:22:33 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the name tag of this area?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12304410Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-20 11:46:02 UTC | xinot | Fixed. I probably was bit too hurry. | |
| 59987709 by BER319 | 1 | 2018-06-20 11:18:29 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,kannst du bei 17 Wegen nochmal nach den Tags schauen? Es ist "parking:lane....", nicht "parkin:lane..."Danke, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-20 17:13:13 UTC | BER319 | Hallo Jan,vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich wollte sowieso gerade noch einmal über diesen Bereich schauen, ob alles richtig ist.Viele GrüßeBER319 | |
| 59972263 by Sheikh Zubeir | 1 | 2018-06-20 11:17:16 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the spelling of tags? It's "intermittent", not "intermitent".Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-21 18:52:57 UTC | Sheikh Zubeir | oops - thanks for the hint, corrected! | |
| 59587661 by Ciceronbenavides | 1 | 2018-06-19 20:48:27 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "fuel:GASOLINA_CORRIENTE = yes" on two gas stations - could you explain what this means? This tag is not used in any place. |
| 59578422 by badincite | 1 | 2018-06-19 19:25:16 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added the tag "VMI=yes" to these buildings. This is not a common to mark that these buildings belong to one group. I guess you're looking for a tag like "operator=VMI".Cheers, Jan |
| 59932803 by pon_de_lions | 1 | 2018-06-19 18:15:41 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added many Japanese keys for 2 recycling containers - could you change those tags to the common ones as they are described in the Wiki?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=recyclingThanks! |
| 59949623 by talfik | 1 | 2018-06-19 18:02:01 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like this import of data went wrong. Most of the objects have only strange tags like the ones below.Also: if this is imported data, the source has to be clearly stated - "Bing" is most likely not correct. colour=18 entity=2DPolyline layer=Bangunan li... |
| 59910545 by PhQ | 1 | 2018-06-18 13:49:20 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used tags like "FR:TRANSDOME:CODE_ARRET" here. These are new and not used in other places yet. In any case reference numbers like these should be in a "ref" tag, e.g. "ref:FR:TRANSDOME:CODE_ARRET". |
| 59862799 by abbytheexplorer | 1 | 2018-06-16 16:50:22 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this area? It has many strange tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8383011Jan |
| 59880618 by lubaum | 1 | 2018-06-16 15:36:36 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,was verstehst du unter einem "Architektenplan"? Hast du den unter einer Lizenz zu Verfügung gestellt bekommen, die kompatibel ist mit ODbL? Ansonsten dürfen solche Pläne nicht so einfach benutzt werden.Gruß, Jan |
| 59811642 by 커맵짱 | 1 | 2018-06-14 10:31:20 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!I saw some tags like "전주제일고 정문 \t정문" in your edits. Please note that all tags in OSM have to use an English key, like those described in the Wiki. Here, the key might be "name". Could you check the edits you made and change the tags to comm... |
| 59818755 by ciastko_365 | 1 | 2018-06-14 10:28:33 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!I saw that you added several opening hours with tags like "opening_hours_PKO_1". Please note that tags like these are not usable for any software. The tag has to be "opening_hours=..." And the syntax of the times has to follow the scheme described in the wi... |
| 59789885 by Zuzka_Majcova | 1 | 2018-06-13 09:07:36 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!In your edits I found some tags like "building=house=yes" - this is a slight mistake and should be "building = house". There is always exactly one '=', separating a key and a value. Could you check the buildings you added and change this tag?If you h... |
| 2 | 2018-06-20 18:53:07 UTC | Zuzka_Majcova | Hi Jan,Oh I didn't realise, sorry. I will go and fix it now!Thanks,Zuzka | |
| 59454968 by VITALE Productos Naturales | 1 | 2018-06-12 12:06:14 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!Please take some time and read the introduction (provided in the editor) how adding features to the map works. You need to follow certain schemes to make sure that all users and all software can make use of your data.Jan |
| 59434668 by MaximusSayan | 1 | 2018-06-01 08:55:54 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like something went wrong with this import. 1096 ways have some strange tags:Cls_CheFor=04Gestion=MFFPCould you check and fix this? |
| 2 | 2018-06-01 09:22:47 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account | Can you link the place where this import was discussed? | |
| 3 | 2018-06-02 15:38:18 UTC | MaximusSayan | it does look like there was error on the import. will fix it and see to find where was the problem. the tagging have been made to keep the information from the MERN and the use of these off road road section in the ZEC. | |
| 4 | 2018-06-12 10:44:38 UTC | mueschel | There are also roads overlapping already existing ways like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592401176I think that this import should be reverted and then reimported in a clean way. | |
| 5 | 2018-06-13 09:53:15 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Note that as it is apparently undiscussed import it may be reverted without any discussion. | |
| 6 | 2018-06-13 09:56:51 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59614357#map=12/45.5542/-77.1626&layers=N is the next apparently undiscussed import | |
| 7 | 2018-07-05 08:21:16 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Again: is this import discussed anywhere? Imports MUST be discussed before doing them, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import for details | |
| 59735591 by Mulenda Reina | 1 | 2018-06-12 08:56:49 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please don't add tags like electricity_payments or cash_access to OSM - this is really private information that must not appear in a public data base. Could you please remove those tags?Thanks, Jan |
| 59735428 by lovenes | 1 | 2018-06-12 08:56:27 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please don't add tags like electricity_payments or cash_access to OSM - this is really private information that must not appear in a public data base. Could you please remove those tags?Thanks, Jan |
| 59705262 by Pab09 | 1 | 2018-06-11 10:34:08 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you're using the tag "tower_type" - the correct spelling is "tower:type". Would you mind checking the nodes you added and fix this mistake?Cheers, Jan |
| 59545191 by lefty74 | 1 | 2018-06-08 18:40:16 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tags access=no, access:residents=yes here. There is a more common way:access = residents (used more than 1000 times). Would you mind changing that?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-14 19:31:24 UTC | lefty74 | Thanks for the tip. | |
| 59615242 by talfik | 1 | 2018-06-07 10:59:22 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like something went wrong here - 100 of these ways have many strange tags which don't look like they should be there: colour=18 elevation=0.00000000000e+000 entity=2DPolyline fid_=0 layer=1 linetype=Continuous linewt=25Could you check & fix th... |
| 59254277 by william costa | 1 | 2018-06-06 21:13:40 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added these tags to several roads:paving=stonessurface=concreteThe first tag is new and looks like some mistake. Could you specify what the surface actually is?Thanks, Jan |
| 59535074 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-06-05 21:44:45 UTC | Sowa1980 | Здравствуйте, поясните причину удаления тегов с объектов? Эти теги были проставлены согласно договоренности , жду отката Ваших правок. |
| 2 | 2018-06-05 21:50:44 UTC | mueschel | Sorry, I don't speak Russian.Names of mapping projects and contributors should not appear as tags on objects but rather in the changeset tags. | |
| 3 | 2018-06-05 21:56:17 UTC | Sowa1980 | Там в тегах указана фамилия, по тому как проекты типовые , этот момент был обсужден в чате телеграмм в россии , вот что бы было понятно о чем речь ссылка https://ru.wikipedia.org... | |
| 4 | 2018-06-05 22:08:29 UTC | mueschel | yes, i know what a water tower is.If you could describe what the meaning of "project:author" is, we could look for a better tag - this looked a lot like someone who wanted to put his own name into the tags. If you want to introduce a new tag like this, please write a page in the OSM wiki... | |
| 5 | 2018-06-05 22:17:00 UTC | Sowa1980 | Project:author=Рожновского этот тег обозначает , что башня построена по типовому проекту имени Рожновского, ссылку я Вам дал. Жду Восстановления тегов. Вики к сожаления пр... | |
| 6 | 2018-06-05 22:19:16 UTC | Sowa1980 | И да в проекте ОСМ не обязательно закреплять это в OSM wiki , согласно правилам проекта человек может применят теги не закрепленные в OSM wiki , которых там еще нет. | |
| 7 | 2018-06-05 22:37:29 UTC | mueschel | Ok, tagging the style of a water tower is indeed useful information, but this was not at all clear reading the tag.I think you should consider changing the tag - "project:author' is in no way related to what you describe here - that would rather be something like 'water_tower:type' or 'wate... | |
| 8 | 2018-06-05 23:11:44 UTC | Sowa1980 | Еще раз повторюсь жду отката изменений. | |
| 9 | 2018-06-06 11:40:35 UTC | mavl | Dear mueschel. I saw your message in the forum [https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62569]. My colleague "Sowa1980" writes that this changeset deletes the "Project:author" tags. He wants to find out the reason for deleting of this tag. Also he writes that this... | |
| 10 | 2018-06-06 11:53:04 UTC | mueschel | Perfect. The last sentence was completly lost in the automatic translation. I will add the tags again later today.Thanks for you patience and help! | |
| 11 | 2018-06-06 12:14:40 UTC | mavl | @mueschel, not at all :-) @Sowa1980, в значении тега специально использован родительный падеж ("Рожновского" вместо "Рожновский")? Возможно, именительный падеж был бы... | |
| 12 | 2018-06-06 15:38:57 UTC | mueschel | I now used the tag "water_tower:design" - because there are already a few "tower:design" in the database, and this seems to make sense.Here is the changeset:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59607226 | |
| 13 | 2018-06-06 18:38:22 UTC | Sowa1980 | да тут вообще то об авторстве больше речь шла)) автор как правило может быть и архитектор и вообще может им не быть)))Даже, если у вас идея и Вы пришли с ней не к архит... | |
| 14 | 2018-06-06 18:47:06 UTC | mueschel | Sorry, the automatic translation of this is just incomprehensible. In English, the word "author" doesn't exist in the context of designing buildings. | |
| 15 | 2018-06-06 18:48:52 UTC | Sowa1980 | Почитайте вот это что бы было понятнее https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Рожновский,_Антон_Александрович | |
| 16 | 2018-06-06 18:52:42 UTC | Sowa1980 | Я вас понимаю, что в английском этого нет)) но зачем Вы стерли теги вот чего я не понимаю )) раз в Вашем языке токового нет у нас то есть)) и вообще такие правки называют... | |
| 17 | 2018-06-07 16:05:42 UTC | Vort | mueschel посчитал, что это имя автора объекта в OSM, а не в реальности (на земле). Поэтому он и удалил его. То есть, случилось недопонимание. Тег :design неплох, я чуть подробн... | |
| 59242271 by Kiekin | 1 | 2018-06-06 16:09:49 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,was meinst du mit "payment:ec-cash"? EC-Karten gibt es schon lange nicht mehr. Gruß, Jan |
| 59238123 by nevw | 1 | 2018-06-06 11:33:58 UTC | mueschel | Hi,these two tags look like a mistake, could you check this?Resources =ReserveWrattens \t=2https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1506573Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-06 11:41:53 UTC | nevw | Thanks Janyes that looks like a mistake.I will have a look and fix in the morning.Nev | |
| 3 | 2018-06-06 23:24:53 UTC | nevw | Wrattens Resources Reserve 2 tags fixed now. | |
| 59217479 by Bernard59118 | 1 | 2018-06-06 11:26:57 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain what the tag "Cremerie" on this vending machine means? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5638002199It's not a common and known tag.Thanks, Jan |
| 59574218 by rivermont | 1 | 2018-06-06 11:15:07 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check these parks? They are overlapping with other parks that are already mapped.Jan |
| 59569892 by Ezgiery | 1 | 2018-06-06 11:12:44 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found the tag "andymkg=saglik" on 44 objects - could you explain what this means?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-07 08:38:48 UTC | Ezgiery | Hey, I work for HOT Turkey and we are doing services mapping for refugees. Those tags are to be able to layer different classes of services. When we finish this layering, that tag will change. Thats an abbreviation for Istanbul Anatolian Side NGO Coordination Group for Refugees. I work on my own acc... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-07 08:43:42 UTC | Ezgiery | We could use created_by tag as well though. I know. Perhaps we will change it to something more meaningful like that after this layering. We are working with several NGOs now and it somehow seemed easier to create this key during the classification. I know it must look strange to you now. Hope I cou... | |
| 59573236 by kabariac | 1 | 2018-06-06 11:11:52 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added tags like "FieldPapers_id=KO13049081" to all of these buildings - these tags should not be uploaded to the OSM database becasus they don't contain any relevant information about the building itself. Could you have a look and remove these tags?Cheers, Jan |
| 59542590 by Ale_Zena_IT | 1 | 2018-06-05 07:23:51 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the spelling of tags on the tunnels? It's 'length', not 'lenght'.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-05 08:48:16 UTC | Ale_Zena_IT | Oh, thanks Jan | |
| 59534570 by Noskburg Group | 1 | 2018-06-05 07:22:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you please review your edits? I found at least 9 different spellings of the key 'proposed:amenity'. Tags with errors can't be used by any software. |
| 2 | 2018-06-06 08:58:28 UTC | Noskburg Group | hi have check and amended... think i have got the all. thanks for the pointer. | |
| 59216625 by 51114u9 | 1 | 2018-06-04 12:03:50 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this parking? The tag 'pt=only' looks like a mistake.http://osm.org/way/590544743Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-05 21:28:35 UTC | 51114u9 | fixed as psv=only | |
| 59310858 by SK53 | 1 | 2018-06-03 16:46:13 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way, the tag 'strans' looks like a mistake.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591343364#map=18/52.89320/-1.08773 |
| 59315453 by Jubaerorun | 1 | 2018-06-03 16:38:40 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added many buildings with a 'name' tag - are these the names of the families living there? Please don't add such private information, OSM is not the right place for that.Jan |
| 59345960 by Ana Paulabgs | 1 | 2018-06-03 16:33:40 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tags 'telado' and 'Telado' here - these tags are not in use in any other place. Could you explain what they mean? In general, only tags that are documented in the Wiki should be used.Jan |
| 59352101 by JAVIER_RIOS | 1 | 2018-06-03 16:31:24 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tags like"street-width=8 mts."This tag is not used in any other place - the correct one would be "width=8" (note that there is no unit - 'meter' is the default |
| 2 | 2018-06-04 19:00:03 UTC | JJIglesias | Saludos Javier, por favor no poner ningun valor NO numerico al usar la etiqueta street-with ; la unidad de medida por defecto de OSM es el metro, asi que al colocar un valor numerico el sistema asume por defecto q hablas de metros. al ponerle letras se corrompe el data. Para este caso solo van Numer... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-04 19:06:56 UTC | JJIglesias | de hecho la etiqueta que usastes street-width NO existe, lo correcto es la etiqueta width (ancho) aplicado a la via... y como dijimos el valor es SOLO NUMERICO | |
| 4 | 2018-06-04 19:12:38 UTC | JJIglesias | Saludos. Te recomendamos que leas el tutorial de Como Utilizar y Editar el mapa de OpenStreetMap, lo puedes encontrar aqui (en español); tambien hay varios tutoriales en Youtube:http://learnosm.org/es/ | |
| 59168669 by pittrichimica | 1 | 2018-06-03 11:47:09 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tags 'opening_hours' and 'variable_date' on this shop - could you explain what you want to tag? Is it open just between Easter and November 11th?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-03 12:34:28 UTC | pittrichimica | Hi Jan,yes, that´s right. As this is a rather special case, I tried to figure out how to tag it using the wiki page. If you find an error, thanks for any tip how to improve...Tanja | |
| 3 | 2018-06-03 15:14:01 UTC | mueschel | Alright, it's as simple asopening_hours = easter-Nov 11 Mo-Su 10:00-18:00You can check such things here:http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/#check | |
| 4 | 2018-06-13 18:59:57 UTC | pittrichimica | Thanks Jan and sorry for the late reply. I adapted the tag. Examples are always easier than a synopsis... | |
| 59469907 by Sedumjo | 1 | 2018-06-03 11:38:36 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,du benutzt hier das Tag "ref_ifopt" - richtig wäre "ref:IFOPT" - ich habe das gerade korrigiert.Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-04 06:06:35 UTC | Sedumjo | Hallo Jan,danke für die Berichtigung und deine Nachricht. Den Fehler werde ich bei den anderen von mir bearbeiteten Haltestellen berichtigen.Viele GrüßeSedumjo | |
| 59163590 by Niels Elgaard Larsen | 1 | 2018-06-01 17:21:25 UTC | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong with the tags on this building, could you check that?https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8316732Cheers, Jan |
| 59116892 by Ger Walsh | 1 | 2018-05-31 18:41:53 UTC | mueschel | Hi,what do you mean be 'unoccupied' on this node?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5008337295Maybe 'disused:'?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-01 12:15:48 UTC | Ger Walsh | Probably something that I should research further on the wiki- the term "disused", in my mind, has suggestions of "derelict" or "abandoned"... I merely meant that it is a viable unit, available/in suitable condition to be rented, and waiting for a tenant. But I am happy... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-01 12:54:28 UTC | mueschel | Ah, ok.There is either the 'temporary:' prefix https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional)Or you could add it to the opening_hours key, e.g. as "2018 Jan 01 - 2018 Jun 25 off" | |
| 59187231 by Sedumjo | 1 | 2018-06-01 11:30:58 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,du benutzt hier den Key "ref_ifopt", die richtige Schreibweise wäre "ref:IFOPT". Ich habe das gerade mal korrigiert.Gruß, Jan |
| 59119396 by bkn_jap | 1 | 2018-06-01 11:17:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi,what does 'decay=yes' mean?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/589605323Maybe "abandoned=yes"?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-06-03 11:04:27 UTC | bkn_jap | I checked the wiki, I guess it's more "disused". Thanks for the suggestion of "abandoned". | |
| 59209050 by look4book | 1 | 2018-05-31 18:39:21 UTC | mueschel | Hi,Please update your OsmAnd app - this version produces wrong tags like "osmand_electricity_combined = charging". |
| 59379657 by Something B | 1 | 2018-05-31 12:35:32 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found nodes like this one where you added two traffic signs on one node:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5650354865Unfortunately, this doesn't work - almost no software is able to understand tags with a ':2' added and this scheme is also not well-defined (albeit in use in few places l... |
| 2 | 2018-05-31 21:25:07 UTC | Something B | Hi, Jan!The idea of using the suffix: 2 is described here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_traffic_signs_tagging but Your idea is more like it. Thank you!Regards,Something B. | |
| 59103579 by Linda Chimento | 1 | 2018-05-21 13:00:42 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!You added the tag "alpinescapes=alpinescapes" to many buildings. This tag is not common and not used in any other place. Could you explain what it means?In general, only tags that are described in the wiki or are available in the menues in the editor should be use... |
| 2 | 2018-05-25 08:27:02 UTC | Linda Chimento | Hi, Thank you!I'm working on a project named Alpinescapes, so I added this tag to find easily all the buildings I previously added.This is the web site of the project, check it out if you want. http://www.paesaggiculturali.polimi.it/#Linda. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-30 11:32:43 UTC | mueschel | Please don't use tags to add private markers. Keep in mind that there are thousands of copies of the OSM database worldwide, and nobody besides you can make any use of these tags..The name of a project you are working on should be put to the changeset comment. | |
| 59102604 by k8tek | 1 | 2018-05-30 11:28:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added 2 nodes with the key 'ASR' - this is new, what does it mean?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-30 12:35:53 UTC | k8tek | Antenna Structure Registratration.http://wireless.fcc.gov/antenna/index.htm?job=home | |
| 59104945 by Wilmer Osario | 1 | 2018-05-30 11:22:04 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this node? Something went wrong with the name tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5628836047Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-30 18:38:17 UTC | Wilmer Osario | Thanks, fixed-it | |
| 59331494 by Esmat Enan | 1 | 2018-05-30 08:57:57 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found many strange tags on these objects:address=Ward no 6damage=Yesdamage_date=2017damage_description=Ground floor inundated by 2017 floods and eroded cementing of the bottom of the concrete wallsdamage_percent=0.25hazrad_intensity=lowPlease use only tags that are described... |
| 59341823 by Ale_Zena_IT | 1 | 2018-05-30 08:26:23 UTC | mueschel | Hi,there are 24 ways here that have very strange tags. Could you have a look and fix this?For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591616594Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-30 08:52:59 UTC | Ale_Zena_IT | Hi, thanks Jan, I've fixed.Still remains an ambiguity on a place of worship https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240809743 so I've contacted the user | |
| 59347763 by Juan Pedro Ruiz | 1 | 2018-05-30 08:23:21 UTC | mueschel | Hi,these 323 buildings have the tag "building_l" which looks like "building:levels". Could you check that?Thanks, Jan |
| 59289819 by ABMotau | 1 | 2018-05-28 11:11:13 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added the tag "residential_details=no" on many objects - could you explain what this is supposed to mean? This tag is not used anywhere else and is not documented.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-28 21:13:23 UTC | lusdavo | Thanks @mueschel, this has been rectified!David. | |
| 59272554 by lusdavo | 1 | 2018-05-28 11:10:52 UTC | mueschel | Hi,,you added the tag "residential_details=no" on many objects - could you explain what this is supposed to mean? This tag is not used anywhere else and is not documented.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-28 11:32:36 UTC | lusdavo | Hi @mueschel, this has been rectified. Thank you for pointing it out to us.David. | |
| 59334832 by CavinAries | 1 | 2018-05-28 11:10:45 UTC | mueschel | Hi,,you added the tag "residential_details=no" on many objects - could you explain what this is supposed to mean? This tag is not used anywhere else and is not documented.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-28 14:38:46 UTC | lusdavo | Thanks @mueschel, this has been rectified.David. | |
| 59073518 by nammala | 1 | 2018-05-28 11:08:38 UTC | mueschel | You added nodes like this one with tags which shouldn't be there.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5626283044/historyPlease make sure that Mapbox (finally!) fixes this issue in their software. I'm annoyed of having to fix such nodes every week since months. |
| 2 | 2018-05-29 04:04:24 UTC | nammala | Hi mueschel,Thanks for flagging the issue , this was caused due to fixing connectivity issues in the city through JOSM and from next time we will make sure that this doesn't happen.Regards,nammala | |
| 59077870 by Hernan | 1 | 2018-05-28 10:05:41 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used tags that are not common: nom_depto = GENERAL ROCA nom_prov = RIO NEGROCan they be replaced by a known key? E.g. is_in:province?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-28 11:52:11 UTC | Hernan | Hello! Yes, I fixed it. I am checking all the towns and cities of my country and I am using a free database of settlements in all the territory for the smaller towns, but without importing it. I am comparing the information that is in OSM case by case. Those labels forget to delete them, but conside... | |
| 59276748 by Павел Гетманцев | 1 | 2018-05-28 09:52:45 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain this edit? Tags like "name:Mar-May:" are not common in OSM and not used in other places.Jan |
| 59316077 by Jubaerorun | 1 | 2018-05-28 09:43:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found many strange tags on your objects.First of all, please do not enter any private information like the names of families or the number of people living in a house. This is no information OSM collects for privacy reasons.Also, please use only tags that are described in the Wiki or ar... |
| 59283001 by Saima Akter Tithi | 1 | 2018-05-28 09:40:51 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found many strange tags on these objects: Damage_Per=50.0 Descriptio=North Borober Jami Mosque Cemetery Latitude=25.43255 Longitude=89.71982 Name_of_As=Cemetery Name_of_Di=Flood Village_Wa=2 No dam_last_d=Yes damage_description=Mudslide if_y... |
| 59312098 by Sameya Afrin | 1 | 2018-05-28 09:38:40 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found many strange tags on these objects:Damage_Per \t50.0Descriptio \tTin shadeName_of_As \tSchool InstituteName_of_Di \tFloodVillage_Wa \t4 no word RaniganjWhat_damag \tFlood damage has occurredamenity \tschoolbuilding \tyesdam_last_d \tYeshezard_intensity \tHighPl... |
| 59263503 by Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury | 1 | 2018-05-28 09:37:19 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found many strange tags on these objects: Damage Percentage=hazard_intensity=high Damage_Per=100 Name_of_As=Italu Kanda digrir char teribad Name_of_Di=Flood Village_Wa=Italu kanda gachbari 1 What_damag=damaged by flood dam_last_d=Yes if_yes_whe=2017... |
| 59306602 by Jasmen khelze sweety | 1 | 2018-05-28 09:34:40 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found many strange tags on these objects:damage=Yesdamage_Per=0.0damage_description=The field sank in floodif_yes_whe=2017.0Please use only tags that are described in the Wiki or are listed in your editor. All other tags can not be understood by any OSM-based software.Jan |
| 59039912 by nadzkie | 1 | 2018-05-24 11:06:35 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found several 'addr:village' tags on your landuse areas. This looks like a mistake. I think some of them should be addr:city or addr:county. Could you have a look and adjust this?Thanks, Jan |
| 59051272 by EPFNA | 1 | 2018-05-24 10:40:38 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!.In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.On this node, the 'payment:...' tags should be different, using tags as they are described in the Wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Ke... |
| 59058214 by danbag | 1 | 2018-05-24 10:34:42 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way and its tag 'sy'?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/589055105Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-25 06:24:34 UTC | danbag | Hi JanI make a mistake and I have erased the tag sy:520.Thanks for the information.Best reagardsDanilo (danbag) | |
| 3 | 2018-07-02 08:09:48 UTC | dikkeknodel | Hi Danilo,I just noticed by coincidence, you added a second Case Cana, the other is 400m northwest and has been there for 8 months longer. I guess one of both has to be a mistaken name.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5113086243I updated that one after a visit, but I did not come up with t... | |
| 59199914 by Mateusz Pawlowski | 1 | 2018-05-24 09:13:55 UTC | mueschel | Please update your GoMap app - this version has a bug and produces wrong tags like "payment:payment:cash". |
| 59193539 by tzosmimport | 1 | 2018-05-23 07:55:41 UTC | mueschel | Hi,these changes have a tag "add:region" which should be "addr:region".What is the meaning of the key "building:sqmeters" on nodes? And: Your user page is missing a link to the description of the import in the Wiki.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-23 14:14:42 UTC | tzosmimport | Jan,Thanks for catching the typo.We are working on the Wiki. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-11 06:26:23 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61558473 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import adding of Plus Codes and sizes of buildings. The codes can be derived from the coordinates. The size can be derived from the building geometry. See https://lists.openstre... | |
| 59114779 by mrsfakename | 1 | 2018-05-21 12:58:33 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I saw tags like "addr:unit_7" on the buildings here. Adding the same tag several times with numbers '_7' is not really common and not supported by most software. I suggest to consider using a single tag and a range of numbers instead, like addr:unit = 51 - 58Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-22 17:06:27 UTC | mrsfakename | Hello and thanks for the input. I'll start incorporating the changes for all the apartment complexes I've been working on. However, if there's a break in apartment numbers what's the standard for entry? For instance, a building has apartments 1-12, no apartment 13, but does have apartments 14-20?... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-22 19:05:28 UTC | mueschel | If several buildings share a housenumber, you can add the same "addr:housenumber" to all of them. If these buildings are all within one area, like an amenity=school area, you can add the address on this area instead of the buildings themselves..You can use addr:unit = 1-13;20-28 (lis... | |
| 59168398 by AgusQui | 1 | 2018-05-22 11:00:58 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you're using the tag "stopping_patern" here. The correct spelling is "stopping_pattern". I just fixed the ones I found.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-22 13:34:09 UTC | AgusQui | Thanks. | |
| 59019667 by Gazer75 | 1 | 2018-05-21 14:37:27 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this node, it has many strange tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5622276584Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 15:25:26 UTC | Gazer75 | Oops, looks like one of the nodes I had to import from the aviation obstacle data didn't get retagged properly :) Thanks for spotting that. Fixed now. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-22 00:19:47 UTC | Gazer75 | How did you spot this error? | |
| 4 | 2018-05-22 09:03:35 UTC | mueschel | Using Taginfo I generate a list of keys which newly appear in the database - in most cases it's reporting simple spelling mistakes.http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm | |
| 59144239 by okilimu | 1 | 2018-05-22 08:48:32 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,du hast hier 'left:kerb' und 'left:kerb:height' verwendet. 'left' wird in der Regel als Suffix verwendet, richtig w're also kerb:left und kerb:height:left.GrußJan |
| 2 | 2018-05-22 16:58:32 UTC | okilimu | danke für den Hinweis, Jan!Ich habe die Tags angepasst | |
| 59025132 by rsavoye | 1 | 2018-05-21 14:38:57 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added 14 objects with strange tags:unitid=Glacierunittype=BLDGCould you have a look and fix these?Thanks,Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 14:55:11 UTC | rsavoye | Thanks, that obscure tag slipped through the data conversion from the original shapefile. I updated those objects without the tag, and fixed the bug in my conversion software. | |
| 59011308 by Augustino Elifasi | 1 | 2018-05-21 13:09:17 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!You used several new and uncommon tags here:Eastings=489004, Northings=9289605- there is no need to add coordinates to the tags, the node itself is already placed at this position.location=Bagamoyo- this should be part of the address, here: addr:city=Bagamoyotime=... |
| 59090737 by frosm | 1 | 2018-05-21 13:05:55 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you introduced a new tag here, "entrance:step:height". The simpler "step:height" is already used 500 times by 40 users. Could you think about using the same tag here?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 16:14:50 UTC | frosm | Hello,Thanks for the comment.I also use step:height on entrance to describe the step:height.but using step:height on a node poi is imho wrong.for ex how to describe that a restaurant has a small step at its front door but you have no information about a possible step after the entrance ?ho... | |
| 59123515 by anttihav | 1 | 2018-05-21 12:56:14 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added 10 nodes with a strange tag:opastin={suunta=laskeva, puoli=oikea, tyyppi=ysje}Could you have a look and fix this (e.g. change to common tags)?Cheers, Jan |
| 58977245 by Adiatma IRM-RV | 1 | 2018-05-20 14:48:20 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added several nodes with a tag "splitPoint". This is no common tag - could you explain what it means?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 00:21:30 UTC | Adiatma IRM-RV | Hi Jan, thank you for bringing this up. SplitPoint is our internal sign as a boundary mark for the intersection of the Tasking Manager box. It should not have been uploaded. My bad & I already deleted it. I will pay more attention to recheck befor upload. Thank you so much Jan. | |
| 58985694 by Chumva | 1 | 2018-05-20 14:45:37 UTC | mueschel | Please don't add such test nodes to the OSM database. For tests there is a development server available.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing |
| 59001177 by mmrdu | 1 | 2018-05-20 14:34:43 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used many tags that are not common in OSM like the ones listed below. Would you mind checking the wiki how these have to be mapped to be usable in all OSM-based services?Thanks, Jan Address = At the end of Front St adjacent to boat ramp Amenities = Boat ramps, water fountain... |
| 2 | 2018-05-24 01:05:38 UTC | mmrdu | Tags have been corrected, thanks for catching that. | |
| 58957878 by Bernard59118 | 1 | 2018-05-20 13:26:24 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of this node? Its tag looks strange.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5617878912Thanks, Jan |
| 58965812 by LeonSKennedy19 | 1 | 2018-05-20 11:26:08 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this node, the tag looks like a mistake:"fitness_station_1 =ew"https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5618410298Thanks, Jan |
| 59089949 by Bert Araali | 1 | 2018-05-19 10:55:13 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added the key "maxspeed:agriculture" on several ways - the correct spelling would be "maxspeed:agricultural". Could you have a look and fix it?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 11:20:20 UTC | Bert Araali | Hello Jan,Sorry for the typo. I think all of them are fixed now. | |
| 59019200 by Sawan Shariar | 1 | 2018-05-17 18:17:11 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this import of more than 6000 buildings seems to have many issues. Among all the tags I find on the objects, only one is correct (building = yes). All the others are no documented tags in OSM. Please fix this!Here are just a few of them:addr_city \t=dhakaaddr_country \t=bangladeshad... |
| 2 | 2018-05-19 04:53:45 UTC | Sawan Shariar | Dear mueschelThank you so much for your kindness. Yes, All the tags are incorrect. Mistakenly I was wrote it (_) in the tags which should be it (:). And some tags are really incorrect. All data will be corrected within a few days. If needed may I contact with you?Thanks | |
| 3 | 2018-05-19 10:03:49 UTC | mueschel | Perfect. Thanks for taking care.Sure you can contact me in case you need help. Just let me know!Jan | |
| 4 | 2018-05-19 11:11:46 UTC | Sawan Shariar | Thanks :) | |
| 59048676 by mhrana98 | 1 | 2018-05-18 10:29:26 UTC | mueschel | Hi,the buildings you edited here do have many misspelled tags that are not used in any other place in OSM. Could you have a look and correct them as well?Here are just a few of them:addr_city =dhakaaddr_country =bangladeshaddr_house =281addr_postcode =1213addr_street =kaporptti Road ... |
| 58935927 by Milton Chaúque | 1 | 2018-05-18 10:17:28 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM. Could you specify if this is a hospital or a pharmacy?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5615996531The name and the tag are contradictory.Thanks, Jan |
| 58903147 by Tarasivets | 1 | 2018-05-17 18:36:55 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the tagging of the hotel?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437435712There are two internet_access:fee tags, one 'yes', one 'no'.Jan |
| 58913600 by Gimnasio Jhalit Fitnes Alto Trujillo | 1 | 2018-05-17 18:32:06 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!Please note that all keys you use to identify an object needs to be in English -everything else is not understood by the software and is not shown on maps.Have a look to the wiki ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org ) to find the common tags.You can also refer to to the preset... |
| 58980167 by Pab09 | 1 | 2018-05-17 18:27:34 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found several tags "tower_type" in your edits. The correct spelling is "tower:type" - I just fixed it.Cheers, Jan |
| 58876714 by Sidou_Dahaba | 1 | 2018-05-17 18:23:38 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the tags on this way?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340916396Bassin =yesLit du fleuve =yesbasin = yesAll of them are not defined and the first two are not used in any other place.Thanks, Jan |
| 58167444 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-05-16 15:22:51 UTC | lowlander | Es wieder zu löschen, wenn es korrekt ist, bringt genau gar nichts weil es nun ohnehin in der Datenbank ist. Ich werde es also revertieren bzw. wieder eintragen. Hauptsache, du bist zufrieden. |
| 2 | 2018-05-16 15:35:05 UTC | mueschel | Es gibt durchaus gute Gründe nur die ID und keine kompletten URLs in OSM zu haben. Was passiert beispielsweise wenn Münster sich entscheidet ihre Webseite umzuorganisieren (was bei vielen großen Seiten häufiger passiert)? Ist nur die ID in der Datenbank muss man nur an einer Ste... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-16 15:38:32 UTC | lowlander | Warum kommentierst du das nicht in meinem Changeset, wie es üblich ist und löscht stattdessen einfach die Ergänzungen statt sie zu revertieren? Darüber solltest du einmal nachdenken.Ich ergänze nun die neuen, korrekten ID-URLs, wie sie auch von den Stadtwerken bereitgestel... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-16 15:43:02 UTC | mueschel | Es gibt keinen technischen Unterschied zwischen löschen und revertieren. Ich habe nur die Tags gelöscht, so ist sicher dass andere, nützliche Änderungen aus deinen Changesets nicht aus Versehen auch verloren gehen. Kümmerst du dich auch um eine Anpassung der URLs wenn dies... | |
| 5 | 2018-05-16 16:05:40 UTC | lowlander | Ja, ich kümmere mich in "meinem Bereich" regelmäßig um Änderungen und Ergänzungen, da ich auch nur dort mappe und tagge, wo ich es überprüfen (lassen) kann. Das siehst du an dieser Diskussion.Über bessere Arbeitsweisen lasse ich mich aber gern bel... | |
| 6 | 2018-05-16 16:12:21 UTC | mueschel | Ja, einen Kommentar an deinem Changeset habe ich in diesem Fall tatsächlich vergessen, entschuldige. | |
| 58876284 by Camachogonzalez | 1 | 2018-05-16 11:58:56 UTC | mueschel | Hi, welcome to OSM.This node uses no common tags.In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.Also, our database in case sensitive, all keys have to be in lower case (withvery few exceptions). Please have a l... |
| 58946283 by Mainga | 1 | 2018-05-16 11:38:32 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found 135 buildings with the tag 'osm_way_id'. This doesn't look like a tag that should be there. Could you check it and remove it?Thanks, Jan |
| 58860070 by Kogacarlo | 1 | 2018-05-15 10:53:22 UTC | mueschel | Hi,the socket type on this node seems strange, this type doesn't exist in other places.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5610128787Could you have a look?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-15 12:23:55 UTC | Kogacarlo | Hi Jan, please take a look at this picture I took https://i.imgur.com/ulu6DcC.jpg and then change the node as you wish. I'm not a socket pro ;-) | |
| 3 | 2018-05-15 12:37:32 UTC | mueschel | According to the images in the Wiki this is a 'type2': https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socketThe number seems to be some ID of this charging station. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-15 17:24:00 UTC | Kogacarlo | Ja, type2 denke ich auch. Was 1712498 heisst weiss ich nicht. | |
| 53640698 by topolusitania | 1 | 2018-05-15 10:59:45 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the tagging of these objects? They do have very strange name tags like 'Ponto F 38,424444N 9,0886111W'. This can't be an actual name.And it's 'protect_class', not 'protected_class'. Please don't forget to add the source of your information to the changeset! |
| 2 | 2018-06-11 12:30:38 UTC | Filohipo | Ponto F. and other points named "Ponto" are points that limit the protected area of "Parque Marinho Luis Saldanha". They are mentioned witl lat and long in the law that created it. They are inportant for openseamap. | |
| 58864353 by RubenKelevra | 1 | 2018-05-15 10:56:47 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,du benutzt hier das Tag 'road_markings', das gibt es sonst nirgends. Entweder 'traffic_sign' für Schilder oder 'road_marking' für Markierungen auf der Straße.Gruß, Jan |
| 58850065 by nbuettler | 1 | 2018-05-15 10:51:31 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,was heißt denn das Tag "strate = temporary"? Wenn dieser Bus nur zeitweise verkehrt, kannst du das mit dem Tag opening_hours machen. |
| 58946736 by MrKrisKrisu | 1 | 2018-05-15 10:38:27 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,würdest du nochmal über das Tagging schauen? An 48 Wegen steht "destination:symbols" anstelle von "destination:symbol".DankeJan |
| 2 | 2018-05-15 10:44:12 UTC | MrKrisKrisu | Mache ich nachher direkt, danke für's drauf Aufmerksam machen. | |
| 58930121 by gekapes | 1 | 2018-05-14 09:06:25 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,die Verkehrsschilder für cycleway und sidewalk kannst du erfassen mitcycleway:left:traffic_sign = DE:237 Das ist besser als eine note:*Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-14 18:14:48 UTC | gekapes | Hallo Jan,ja - schaut sicher besser und verständlicher aus. Werde ab jetzt auch so taggen. Beziehst Du Dich auf diese Seite:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign ?ich habe inzwischen viele durch note:sign gemacht - werde diese nicht ändern, da es zu viel Arbeit ist... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-14 18:17:39 UTC | mueschel | Ja, das ist die Kombination von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Supplementary_detailsund deinem Link.Ein Blick in Taginfo zeigt, dass diese Tags schon ziemlich häufig verwendet werden:https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/cycleway%3Aleft%3Atraffic_sign#overview | |
| 58931809 by Bobby444 | 1 | 2018-05-14 09:02:48 UTC | mueschel | Hi Bobby,in your edits, I saw several tags like "bobby444:schema" - could you explain what it means? It's very uncommon to put ones username in a tag.And: the tags like "pattern_saturday:interval" are not used in any other place.The usual key for this is "interval:... |
| 2 | 2018-05-14 09:33:50 UTC | Bobby444 | The bobby444:schema is a private notation for me until I can get things stabilised. It is part of my nascent system for tagging bus services sensibly. When I've decided how it is going to work, I'll submit it as a proposal for people to vote on. I used my own username so as to avoid conflicts with o... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-14 10:20:45 UTC | mueschel | Alright, work in progress is always good. I don't really like the idea to have so much information in the key. This mostly ends in a huge mess of subkeys that no tool can parse easily. Did you try to use the syntax used in :conditional tags? That would be the perfect way to tag arbitrary times a... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-14 11:06:27 UTC | Bobby444 | Yes, it's ugly, and I tried to explain what I was up against on the talk:buses page, but my edits got lost somehow.A huge mess of subkeys is, as you say, a bad idea.I'm not familiar with this conditional syntax that you mention. Is it documented anywhere ?OSM doesn't seem to 'get' buses,... | |
| 5 | 2018-05-14 11:08:02 UTC | Bobby444 | If you can provide me a link to the :conditional stuff, I'll try and rework my relations to use that, then I won't need to have 'my own' schema. | |
| 58675546 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-05-14 06:34:07 UTC | PT-53 | Hallo mueschel,Du hast an diesem zurückgebauten Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371762169/history removed:highway auf not:highway geändert. Warum ? |
| 2 | 2018-05-14 08:55:04 UTC | mueschel | Der ehemalige Weg an sich ist wohl keine erhaltenswerte Information, auch wenn er im Augenblick in der Datenbank bleiben sollte als Markierung, dass die Luftbilder nicht mehr stimmen.Für so etwas nehme ich eher not: als removed:. Ich habe den Weg aber auch nur umgetagged, weil ich die ander... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-14 11:39:19 UTC | PT-53 | Hallo mueschel,wir sind uns einig, daß der Weg - solange er noch auf den Luftbildern zu sehen ist - noch in OSM verbleiben soll.Aber warum verwendest Du not:highway statt wie im Wiki vorgegeben removed:highway ?Wiki Lebenszyklus: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix.... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-18 12:24:37 UTC | PT-53 | Hallo mueschel,ich habe das wieder auf das Wiki-konforme korrekte Tagging zurückgesetzt. | |
| 58806614 by Eng Eqlima Rasuli | 1 | 2018-05-13 13:14:54 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added the key "yares" on this road. It's not used in any other place, what does it mean?Jan |
| 58794492 by Alexb60 | 1 | 2018-05-12 12:05:39 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way? The tag "basc" looks like a mistake.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231719753Cheers, Jan |
| 58873162 by phiona2018Munezero | 1 | 2018-05-12 10:10:52 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like this import of 405 nodes went wrong. All these nodes have many tags, but none of them uses a known key. Could you check that? And: There is no information about the source. "esri World Imagery" is obviously wrong. |
| 58751183 by dingalo | 1 | 2018-05-11 10:50:00 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "buildings:name" on 53 ways. Could you fix the spelling? It's "building:name".Thanks, Jan |
| 58768537 by d3mol3k | 1 | 2018-05-11 10:47:21 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the tagging of 62 ways? It's "construction", not "constuction".Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-11 16:36:31 UTC | d3mol3k | Thanks Jan - she made a typo. Corrected. Robert | |
| 58805010 by opengislab | 1 | 2018-05-10 10:55:52 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like there are several things wrong with this import.1) Could you point me to the page detailing how this import is done? It has to exist according to the Import Guidelines2) Sources have to be clearly stated in the changeset. A tag "notas" asking to respect licenses ... |
| 58535439 by bau-lau | 1 | 2018-05-01 09:38:18 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,du brauchst hier keine komplizierte Tag-Konstruktion wie restriction:taxi =no_left_turntype =restriction:taxiDu kannst ganz normal type=restrictionrestriction = no_left_turnverwenden - alle anderen als Taxis dürfen ja ohnehin nicht in die Straße rein, sind von der Re... |
| 2 | 2018-05-09 21:21:33 UTC | bau-lau | Hallo Jan, die von Dir "komplizierte Tag-Konstruktion" habe ich von der wiki abgeschrieben (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Tags). Scheinbar wird dies aber von den sogar darauf spezialisierten Fahrradroutern (wie z.B. brouter oder GraphHopper) (noch?) nicht ausg... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-09 21:34:59 UTC | mueschel | Wie du schon schreibst, solche speziellen Konstrukte sind von vielen Tools nicht komplett unterstützt. Deswegen immer so einfach wie möglich taggen. Das Wiki gibt dort ja auch gleich drei verschiedene Taggingmöglichkeiten. Diese scheinen auch alle keine Verbreitung zu haben.type=r... | |
| 58795933 by Dante Torreggiani | 1 | 2018-05-09 18:51:03 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of the tag "truks_residential \tyes"? This is not used in any other place.Thanks, Jan |
| 58754728 by Danilo Freiles | 1 | 2018-05-09 11:58:29 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added the tag "recycling:Olio_usato" here. What kind of oil is it? We do have the tags "recycling:cooking_oil" or "recycling:motor_oil" to be more precise.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-09 15:12:17 UTC | Danilo Freiles | cooking_oilCorrected, thx. | |
| 58814634 by muindre | 1 | 2018-05-09 11:55:49 UTC | mueschel | Typically toilets do use other tags.For example:hand_wash_point -> toilets:handwashinghow_many_chambers -> toilets:num_chamberstype_of_toilet -> toilets:disposal |
| 58812585 by muindre | 1 | 2018-05-09 11:51:13 UTC | mueschel | Hi,the tag "gender_type" is not common. OSM uses "gender=male/female/mixed".the tag "type" is not used for schools. We do use "school=*" or "isced:level". |
| 58781865 by muindre | 1 | 2018-05-09 11:49:09 UTC | mueschel | Hi,the tags "cost_per_litre", "cost_per_liter" and "cost_in_ksh" do not fit to our usual tags. OSM knows fee = yes/no as well as charge=*The tag "village" is not common as well. To note the location we use "is_in:...=*" |
| 58787234 by poornibadrinath | 1 | 2018-05-09 09:09:47 UTC | mueschel | Hi,there are some nodes which seem to be imported error markers from your software.For example:http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5604444613I saw these mistakes by many people working at Mapbox - could you try to get your companies workflow fixed?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-09 09:14:39 UTC | poornibadrinath | Hi,Thank you so much for letting us know about this. We will work in fixing these. We have deleted most of them already. But I guess we missed a couple of the pointers. Will rectify it soon. Thanks again! | |
| 3 | 2018-05-09 09:14:57 UTC | poornibadrinath | *on | |
| 58551465 by muindre | 1 | 2018-05-01 09:26:13 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found many objects with tags like these: Opening_hours=24_7 Photo=1524481337267.jpg Village=Upper Kitheini type_of_facility=Water pipeline wb_pb:id=21640565This information might be correct, but is rather useless - the tags don't follow any established tagging schem... |
| 2 | 2018-05-08 09:19:35 UTC | muindre | Hi Mueschel, tried writing back to you explaining about the tags but it seems our message was never delivered. We are already in the process cleaning up the data and fixing the tags. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-08 20:24:22 UTC | mueschel | Hi,perfect that you take care. In total I found 50 different tags which are not used in any other place. Most of them can easily be changed to common and documented keys. Just send me a message if I can assist in any way.Jan | |
| 58760582 by Geodemaria | 1 | 2018-05-08 13:01:57 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of these Relations? They don't seem to have any known tag.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-08 13:49:44 UTC | Geodemaria | Hi Jan, I used the generic relationship "building" = "house". I found the tags here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Map_Features#AbitazioniI hope I was clear.See you soon! | |
| 3 | 2018-05-08 20:18:05 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I think there are several issues here. First, all buildings are mapped twice, for example:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/586368852https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/586355996These are two ways for the same building. One should be removed. In total there are 1339 of these errors in the v... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-08 21:18:41 UTC | Geodemaria | Hello, good evening. you are definitely right. I have brought back information from the initial shape file that is not needed. in the coming days I will modify all the problems encountered. this is my first insertion of this scope. sorry. | |
| 58744946 by maning | 1 | 2018-05-08 12:59:39 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the tagging of all these objects? It's 'addr:state', not 'add:state'.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-08 14:19:34 UTC | maning | Thanks for flagging, obviously a mistake. Fixing here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58790245 | |
| 58769317 by Mateusz Konieczny | 1 | 2018-05-07 20:12:50 UTC | mueschel | Would you please check the edits and not reintroduce wrong tags by doing reverts blindly? And: if you comment a changeset of another user, please wait for an answer, otherwise discussion is pointless. |
| 2 | 2018-05-07 20:29:56 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | I reverted your edit because you made several edit based on misconception that only tags described in OSM wiki are allowed. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-07 20:45:58 UTC | mueschel | This specific tag was only added due to a bug in the GoMap app that has been fixed meanwhile. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-07 20:49:45 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Maybe I overreacted in this case - feel free to revert this edit if you think that it improves map. | |
| 57626490 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-04-18 18:39:35 UTC | marczoutendijk | Any specific reason why you moved this tagging to a note? Did you read the discussion on the Dutch forum?https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60633 |
| 2 | 2018-04-19 08:19:02 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it's a new tag that wasn't used before. I checked the wiki and wasn't able to find any description of it. I didn't find a discussion in the forums, but I also don't speak Dutch.I'm perfectly fine with using the tag - you seem to have some discussion about it and if you add a description in ... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-07 20:11:30 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Why you think that hiding "random tags" in notes improves anything? Nonsense useless tags should be deleted, mistagged info should be fixed.Moving them to notes merely hides problem and accomplishes nothing - this kind of edit is as result harmful. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-07 20:18:55 UTC | mueschel | It's not hiding the information - in contrary, it makes it visible. JOSM shows it now as a special icon, and also iD can list it for the casual user you doesn't look in the list of all tags. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-07 20:28:03 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | What you mention may be achieved by adding "fixme=suspicious tags XYZ".Moving weird tags to note makes nearly impossible to spot issue again. | |
| 58736763 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-05-07 20:05:54 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | it just makes them harder to spot and really fix! What is the point of that edit? |
| 2 | 2018-05-07 20:17:09 UTC | mueschel | Would you please stop reverting the work of others without discussion? A 'description' tag is exactly the right place to list the amenities a park has to offer. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-07 20:26:21 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | "A 'description' tag is exactly the right place to list the amenities a park has to offer."So why you moved them to note tag? | |
| 58769233 by Mateusz Konieczny | 1 | 2018-05-07 20:15:07 UTC | mueschel | This was not a 'mechanical edit'. I did it deliberately by hand. Undocumented tags are useless in OSM. And I'm very willing to communicate. |
| 2 | 2018-05-07 20:24:59 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | "Undocumented tags are useless in OSM" - that is untrue. Frequently tags may be documented (I done it with many of them). | |
| 3 | 2018-05-07 20:25:21 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | "And I'm very willing to communicate." - and thanks for that! | |
| 58754503 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-05-07 20:02:17 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Yes, it gives. It confirms that some foreign currencies may be withdrawn here. |
| 2 | 2018-05-07 20:11:09 UTC | mueschel | There is a reason that currency:others=yes doesn't exist in the wiki. The only value is 'no', indicating that all currencies available are mentioned in the tags and none are missing. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-07 20:23:45 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | "There is a reason that currency:others=yes doesn't exist in the wiki."You seem to think that only tags defined in wiki may be used. It is untrue.It is useful to fix broken tags (as long as one verifies whatever edit makes sense and is not hiding serious issues), it is useful to de... | |
| 58754574 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-05-07 19:59:25 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | What was point of this edit? |
| 2 | 2018-05-07 20:00:19 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | If you stuff everything into note tag - please, as minimum, ensure that produced note has no new typos. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-07 20:09:01 UTC | mueschel | The tag 'visible_in' is not in use elsewhere and not defined anywhere. A note on the other hand is shown in all editors to make any other mapper aware of the problem. I just moved the existing information to a place visible to others. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-07 20:21:30 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | "is not in use elsewhere and not defined anywhere" and? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_likenote already existed, this tag only provided extra info" note on the other hand is shown in all editors" - for start it is simply untrue. | |
| 58295618 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-05-07 19:54:24 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Why you made this edit? Can you use edit description that explain why you made an edit? |
| 2 | 2018-05-07 20:06:46 UTC | mueschel | There is no need for a new tag 'service_times:mass' - that's by definition 'service_times'. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-07 20:18:40 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-April/035869.html for explanationplease, do not remove tags just because you do not understand why somebody added them | |
| 58721013 by Tamerdab | 1 | 2018-05-07 11:08:56 UTC | mueschel | Hi,your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "recycling:recycling:glass_bottles". Please update the app.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-07 11:50:56 UTC | Tamerdab | There ls new update, and update it last night. And I’ll send email to the team of go map to check that problem, thanks 🙏 | |
| 3 | 2018-05-07 12:00:41 UTC | mueschel | Perfect, this was the reason for the update yesterday, see: https://github.com/bryceco/GoMap/issues/122 | |
| 4 | 2018-05-07 23:55:28 UTC | Tamerdab | Oh great 👍, there is more to add to the app , and it’s a very great app to mapping. It’s simple and easy, not like JOSM . 😊My aiming for now Is to add all the Embassy’s here on Israel with Full details , so it’s can help tourist And visitors And make there l... | |
| 58721404 by Pierre_Tacheron | 1 | 2018-05-07 11:11:55 UTC | mueschel | Hi,your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "payment:payment:cash". Please update the app.Jan |
| 58738860 by Netmajor | 1 | 2018-05-07 11:11:47 UTC | mueschel | Hi,your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "payment:payment:cash". Please update the app.Jan |
| 58675907 by Ogmios | 1 | 2018-05-07 11:11:13 UTC | mueschel | Hi,your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "payment:payment:cash". Please update the app.Jan |
| 58719337 by Taw Ka Hlaing | 1 | 2018-05-07 11:10:50 UTC | mueschel | Hi,your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "payment:payment:cash". Please update the app.Jan |
| 58724168 by 4004 | 1 | 2018-05-07 11:09:58 UTC | mueschel | Hi,your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "communication:communication:mobile_phone". Please update the app.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-07 15:10:31 UTC | 4004 | Thanks for spotting Jan, fixed | |
| 58723868 by Sven2603 | 1 | 2018-05-07 11:07:44 UTC | mueschel | Hi,deine Version von GoMap hat einen Bug und produziert falsche Tags wie "recycling:recycling:glass_bottles". |
| 58700585 by Uwenr5 | 1 | 2018-05-06 18:11:29 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,das Tag "goods:conditions:maxweight" gibt es nicht. Was ist da genau vor Ort ausgeschildert?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25361693Wahrscheinlich istmaxweight = 5 odermaxweight:hgv = 5 richtig. |
| 58706870 by reinmanu | 1 | 2018-05-05 13:02:47 UTC | reinmanu | fuck...made a little mistake and put for the key "emergency" not "fire_hydrant" and instead "hydrant"Is it possible to delete this data again? |
| 2 | 2018-05-05 13:16:05 UTC | reinmanu | i think i fixed it...just renamed them | |
| 3 | 2018-05-06 11:27:51 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,woher stammen diese Daten? "knowledge" ist es wohl eher nicht. Bitte denke immer daran, dass alle externen Quellen unter einer Lizenz stehen müssen, die mit der ODbL von OSM kompatibel ist.Gruß, Jan | |
| 4 | 2018-05-06 14:34:25 UTC | reinmanu | Hallo Jan, Die Daten wurden von uns als Feuerwehr erhoben und bereits in internen Karten verwendet,und von uns hier zur Verfügung gestellt. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-06 16:00:25 UTC | mueschel | Gut, bei selbst erhobenen Daten gibt es keine Lizenzprobleme. Am besten immer direkt im changeset mit angeben, dann gibt es da keine Unklarheiten. Über das Tagging solltest du / ihr nochmal drüberschauen:X_COORD = 17645.679Y_COORD = 22021.8273Diese Tags gehören nicht in OSM,... | |
| 6 | 2018-05-06 19:45:14 UTC | reinmanu | Vielen Dank für die Anregungen!Die Koordinatetags werde ich entfernen, und den Rest anpassen, ist mir anscheinend irgendwo durchgerutscht.Lt. dem Wikieintrag habe ich mir gedacht das die Position hier hineinkommt, note gibts da nicht.Weißt du zufällig ob note auch von der ope... | |
| 58569620 by Chieftl | 1 | 2018-05-03 18:19:03 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you're using tags like "roof:shape:south" on these buildings. Unfortunately, this tag is not really useful, as it is not defined in the wiki. If you want to have such a detailed mapping of roof shapes, you have to work with building:parts. I'm sure you can find some examples in this l... |
| 2 | 2018-05-03 19:20:47 UTC | Chieftl | HiThanks for note.I was studying OSM Wiki before adding this tag, but I didn't found how to map roof which has different type on opposite sides (hipped/gabled in this case).I am not sure that it is possible by splitting building to building:parts because of center connection of building:parts ... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-04 17:49:12 UTC | mueschel | I'm not a full expert on this, but it might be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM-4D/Roof_table#Roofs_with_2_facesroof:shape = side_hipped (521 times in OSM)If you could provide a good image? | |
| 58633189 by Harry Archer | 1 | 2018-05-04 12:22:01 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way and its name tag?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462780880Cheers, Jan |
| 58642025 by NKA_import | 1 | 2018-05-04 12:00:18 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this node, there are many strange tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5594218128Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-04 12:00:53 UTC | mueschel | and here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/585381319 | |
| 3 | 2018-05-04 14:58:51 UTC | NKA_import | Thank you. Not sure how these got in. Fixed now. | |
| 58615498 by Christian Sorkale | 1 | 2018-05-04 11:43:05 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,bitte schau mal im Wiki wie medizinische Einrichtungen getaggt werden müssen um nutzbar zu sein.z.B. hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office=therapistGruß, Jan |
| 58604913 by Protoxenus | 1 | 2018-05-04 11:36:51 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,was heißt denn "survey_video = inside"? Das Tag gibt es bisher nicht.Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-04 18:31:10 UTC | Protoxenus | Hallo,du hast natürlich Recht, das tag ist nicht sehr sinnvoll. War mit dem Mobiltelefon unterwegs (OsmAnd) und da ist die Auswahl der Vorlagen beschränkt. Habe es geändert. Danke für den Hinweis Gruß Protoxenus | |
| 58584223 by Wilmer Osario | 1 | 2018-05-04 11:11:40 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this node? Something went wrong with the name tag.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5590273055Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-05 22:52:27 UTC | Wilmer Osario | Thanks, it's fixed | |
| 58575617 by pieleric | 1 | 2018-05-04 11:04:17 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added a charging_station here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5589750881The tag should be amanity = charging_station, but for some reason it is osmand_electricity_combined \t= chargingI saw this several times recently - this looks like some issue with the OsmAnd app. Could y... |
| 2 | 2018-05-08 21:04:16 UTC | pieleric | Hi Jan,Thanks for noticing. I'm using a development version of Osmand and that seems indeed to be a brand new bug... I'll inquiry more on the Osmand side to make sure this is fixed.In the mean time, I've fixed all the (2) wrongly tagged charging stations that I had added. | |
| 58642952 by Bemadji | 1 | 2018-05-04 10:32:14 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!I found the key "battiment" on several objects you added. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. "battiment" is not a defined tag. Please have a look to the Wiki to se... |
| 58559023 by Globeur | 1 | 2018-05-03 17:36:27 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572074986The tag "30=50" looks like a mistake.Cheers, Jan |
| 58613136 by fondolucy | 1 | 2018-05-03 15:06:17 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found many objects with tags like these:Opening_hours=24_7Photo=1524481337267.jpgVillage=Upper Kitheinitype_of_facility=Water pipelinewb_pb:id=21640565This information might be correct, but is rather useless - the tags don't follow any established tagging scheme and can not be und... |
| 58612187 by Kitone | 1 | 2018-05-03 15:06:04 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found many objects with tags like these:Opening_hours=24_7Photo=1524481337267.jpgVillage=Upper Kitheinitype_of_facility=Water pipelinewb_pb:id=21640565This information might be correct, but is rather useless - the tags don't follow any established tagging scheme and can not be und... |
| 58524997 by Astromath | 1 | 2018-05-01 10:04:58 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the tags "waymark" and "control_number"? These are not used in any other place. If these are reference numbers, the usual tag is "ref:XYZ".Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-01 18:45:11 UTC | Astromath | I'm not sure what waymark and control_numbers are. The sites I got the info from did not define them (re: websites I entered). Maybe ref could be used for them, but I don't know how many characters can be used for that field. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-02 09:09:19 UTC | mueschel | If you don't know what they mean, they should not be in OSM.Btw, what is the source of this data? It's missing in the changeset. Is this data available under a license compatible with ODbL? | |
| 4 | 2018-05-02 19:08:59 UTC | Astromath | The data is from the 2 websites I added. Both are public websites. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-02 19:53:34 UTC | mueschel | These might be public, but the data can not be used for OSM - their terms of use contain "private, non-commercial" use and "attribution" needed.All data you got from these sites must be removed. | |
| 6 | 2018-05-03 13:58:49 UTC | Astromath | Ok. Removed the parts that are "private" use and only left in the parts that are "obvious" when looking at it from the street. I also left in the sculptor because that should be found in any record, especially the library. | |
| 58609511 by Peter Agenga | 1 | 2018-05-02 13:21:23 UTC | mueschel | Hi again,please stop adding tags like these:Opening_and_Closing_hours_002 \t= 24_7Operational_status = non_operationalPhoto = 1524652112048.jpgType = otherType_of_facility = Water kioskVillage = NyunzuIt's wasted time of yours, because nobody can make any use of this data.See a... |
| 58557257 by padvinder | 1 | 2018-05-02 09:56:12 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way and its tracktype-tag?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584714074Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-02 12:08:53 UTC | padvinder | sorry! intussen gedaan. dank voor de oplettendheid. | |
| 58578899 by Ale_Zena_IT | 1 | 2018-05-02 09:01:13 UTC | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong with this import. There are about 200 ways without any useful tags, like this one:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584868254 |
| 2 | 2018-05-02 09:14:11 UTC | Ale_Zena_IT | Hi,many thanks mueschel.I have checked all of that but I've uploaded the wrong layer. Now it's corrected. | |
| 58526437 by João Pedro Moura | 1 | 2018-05-01 09:43:22 UTC | mueschel | Hi,what does this way represent?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584381226It doesn't have a valid tag. It's definitely not "landuse=residential". Is it a boundary? |
| 2 | 2018-05-15 09:42:31 UTC | wille | oi, João PedroNão é necessário definir o contorno da cidade, isso pode ser gerado automaticamente a partir das ruas. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58526437 | |
| 58550664 by Peter Agenga | 1 | 2018-05-01 09:26:33 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found many objects with tags like these: Opening_hours=24_7 Photo=1524481337267.jpg Village=Upper Kitheini type_of_facility=Water pipeline wb_pb:id=21640565This information might be correct, but is rather useless - the tags don't follow any established tagging schem... |
| 58504234 by jareklec | 1 | 2018-04-30 11:13:30 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this node? "addr:city:" looks like a mistake.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-30 11:34:02 UTC | jareklec | Hi, I was also thinking about it, but according to this source <http://rawicz.e-mapa.net> is correct. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-30 11:48:04 UTC | mueschel | The city is really named "0375852"? | |
| 4 | 2018-04-30 11:57:23 UTC | jareklec | I apologize for the lack of focus, at this moment I corrected it, thanks for your attention. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-30 12:09:19 UTC | mueschel | Perfect. I tried to guess what you meant, but didn't come up with 'simc'. | |
| 58500195 by Munro J-L | 1 | 2018-04-30 10:14:09 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of this node? The tag you put on it doesn't tell anything.Jan |
| 58515092 by Ashek | 1 | 2018-04-29 14:58:10 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of all these "Total..." tags on this area? This might be a good description of the object,but is not usable in OSM - no software can understandit. Please have a look at the wiki about common tags.Let us know in case you need help!Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-29 15:03:45 UTC | Ashek | Indeed, it indicates the total children/population of the mentioned area. Do you please suggest me how I can mention it. Thanks. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-29 15:16:38 UTC | mueschel | These are tags used in other places as well. At least the first two are also mentioned in the Wiki.Total Population -> populationTotal Household -> householdsTotal Children -> population:childrenI don't know what the other tags mean, so I can't make a suggestion. | |
| 58495671 by aboges26 | 1 | 2018-04-29 15:00:45 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you uploaded 9 small areas with just foreign tags like "Shape_len" like this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584093965Was this a mistake? Could you check & fix this?Jan |
| 58460784 by Fivea | 1 | 2018-04-29 12:00:24 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added many colour tags on bus_stops. Is this the colour / names of the bus lines stopping there? If so, this should be put to a "route_ref=*" tag.Jan |
| 58491615 by James69 | 1 | 2018-04-28 17:05:25 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain what this node represents? Just some "white rabbit" keys and values don't describe it very well.Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-28 17:28:01 UTC | James69 | Yes the White Rabbit is an upscale up-cycled resale shop | |
| 3 | 2018-04-28 17:47:00 UTC | mueschel | Ok, how about shop=second_hand? This is the best I can come up with at the moment and at least is a rough description. I would also add a description=* tag stating exactly what you just wrote.If they focus on some special kind of work, a craft=* tag could be fitting as well.Jan | |
| 58463695 by Topol23456 | 1 | 2018-04-28 17:30:18 UTC | mueschel | This changeset was reverted: Vandalism in form of various random tags |
| 58465085 by Bijay adhikari | 1 | 2018-04-28 17:07:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain this node?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5242272044Is it a governments office, or something about fish? |
| 58436125 by murble | 1 | 2018-04-28 16:04:37 UTC | mueschel | Hi. The two types of fuel, "fuel:98E5" and "fuel:Di" are new - could you check the wiki for common types and fix the tagging?Cheers, Jan |
| 58444756 by Melsensp | 1 | 2018-04-28 16:02:45 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!you added a node with two tags which are not common. This might be a good description of the object,but is not usable in OSM - no software can understandit. Please have a look at the wiki about commontags for shops or amenities.Let us know in case you need help!Jan\... |
| 57880890 by 77TC - Denali | 1 | 2018-04-09 10:45:09 UTC | mueschel | Hi,in your edits I found the tags "working", "working ", "Working" and "Working ". Please make sure you use only lower case letters and no spaces in the key. The same holds for the values, "Pole" should be "pole". Could you have a look ... |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 20:24:12 UTC | VlIvYur | Hi everyoneThe same for "MH ", "MH", "mh", "LED", "LED ", "NO", "no", "No", "yes", "Yes", "wall", "Wall"... just choose one and use it everywhenAlso strange lamp_model that loo... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 11:46:08 UTC | mueschel | I also doubt that all these street_lamps are actually in the mapped positions, there are places with 10 lights in a 10m x 10m area.(Esri images seem to be up-to-date here) | |
| 4 | 2018-04-28 11:15:09 UTC | mueschel | There is no feedback and the tags and positions of the lamps seem suspicious. I opt for a revert of this data. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-29 19:16:26 UTC | VlIvYur | I think you are right | |
| 58344743 by Raven Nahid | 1 | 2018-04-24 13:06:45 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you uploaded several nodes with very strange tags.For examplehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5574070315Was that a mistake?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-28 11:12:48 UTC | mueschel | I reverted this changeset - there are no buildings with more than a kilometer size and no 100 km^2 riverbank here. | |
| 58087868 by Horst Hugo | 1 | 2018-04-27 13:40:30 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,du benutzt hier den Key "roof:slope:direction" - dieser Key wurde 2015 nach einer Diskussion abgeschafft. Standard ist "roof:direction".Würdest du das anpassen?Gruß, Jan |
| 58452613 by marcotbs | 1 | 2018-04-27 13:39:40 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,du benutzt hier den Key "roof:slope:direction" - dieser Key wurde 2015 nach einer Diskussion abgeschafft. Standard ist "roof:direction".Würdest du das anpassen?Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-28 10:49:38 UTC | marcotbs | Ich ändere es im Verlauf der weiteren Verfeinerungen. Es scheint aber auch keinen Renderer zu geben welcher das Tag adäquat beachtet (F4M bspw. tut es nicht) | |
| 58410963 by chaot1401 | 1 | 2018-04-25 18:27:31 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,bitte benutze das name-Tag nicht für solche Beschreibungen. Wenn du eine Sperrung des Weges angeben willst, geht das mit access:conditional = no @ (Mar 14 - Aug 16) |
| 57773023 by chaot1401 | 1 | 2018-04-25 18:25:28 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,willkommen bei OSM. Bitte nutze das "name" Tag nicht für Beschreibungen die kein Name sind. z.B. "roter, hellblauer und dunkelblauer Weg"Wanderrouten und deren Schilder werden in OSM anders eingetragen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Wandern#Erfasse... |
| 2 | 2018-04-26 11:54:02 UTC | chaot1401 | Hallo Jan,das Naturschutzgebiet Drover Heide ist in mehrere, farblich markierte Wegstrecken eingeteilt. Wenn ich z.B. die komoot-App nutze, dann sagt mir mein Navi: bitte dem "roten, hellblauen und dunkelblauen Weg" folgen. Dann erkenne ich an der farblichen Markierung sofort, dass ich d... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-26 12:58:36 UTC | Parzelle13 | Hallo, welche Wanderweg-Relationen bereits existieren kann man sich z.B. hier https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=1027136&map=13!50.7245!6.5734 ansehen. Dort sieht man auch ob diese vollständig sind oder nicht. Eine weitere möglichkeit wäre http://www.wanderreitkarte.de/\... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-26 15:00:56 UTC | Parzelle13 | Hallo nochmal, ich habe mir mal den Info-Flyer Stand 2011 der Gemeinde Kreuzau angesehen http://www.kreuzau.de/fkt/downloads/wandern/Drover-Heide02-2011.pdf.Die Namen der Wege lauten dort aber ganz anders. Ohne deren Zustimmung dürfen die Daten davon aber nicht übernommen werden. Also se... | |
| 58374734 by kapsa | 1 | 2018-04-25 14:37:33 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain this? What is a "lake trail" if it's not a path to walk on? |
| 2 | 2018-04-25 16:04:05 UTC | kapsa | You are right but the earlier description referred to this segment as a "footpath" which I believe is something next to a road while a lake trail has a nature element. There is a tree covered trail all around this lake. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-25 16:39:19 UTC | mueschel | It was "highway=footway" - this is not related to a sidewalk (on the side of a road).See the description in the wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=footwayIt's just a generic tag for a path which is mainly intended for pedestrians.You can add further details us... | |
| 58364907 by staytuned | 1 | 2018-04-25 14:39:36 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,du verwendest hier zweimal das Tag"has_area_equivalent"Das ist neu - kannst du erklären was du damit meinst?Gruß, Jan |
| 58363262 by EliziR | 1 | 2018-04-25 09:57:31 UTC | mueschel | Hi,what is the meaning of this tag?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5575320051Ubach = barIt looks like some mistake.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-26 21:19:01 UTC | EliziR | Fixed. Thx! | |
| 58336420 by amynyiri | 1 | 2018-04-25 09:54:17 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582871803It doesn't have any descriptive tag, just a name and something that looks like a mistake.Jan |
| 58392445 by Bert Araali | 1 | 2018-04-25 09:23:24 UTC | mueschel | Hi,there are a few spelling mistakes of tags here - it's "height", not "heigth".The same for building:height and roof:height.It's "building", not "buildiing" or "builidng" or "biulding" etc.On the first glance it's about 300 spellin... |
| 2 | 2018-04-26 05:53:44 UTC | Bert Araali | Hello Jan, also noticed it. I am using ID and trying out some new 3D and indoor tagging features. I am updating it the coming few days and will remove the typos. Thanks for the help. | |
| 58366786 by Kolla6 | 1 | 2018-04-25 09:19:50 UTC | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong with this upload - there are 97 ways with very strange tags. Please check & fix it.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-26 01:20:06 UTC | Kolla6 | Fixing the issue right away , thanks for the sharing the information, apologise for the mistake | |
| 3 | 2018-04-26 01:46:52 UTC | Kolla6 | changes are done..Thanks | |
| 58341784 by GerdHH | 1 | 2018-04-24 13:11:54 UTC | mueschel | Ich nehme an 'lsn_ref' an diesen Knoten soll 'lwn_ref' heißen?Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-24 17:29:39 UTC | GerdHH | Nein, es ist ein kleiner Test rund um "mein Hotel". Zum Hintergrund siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Piste_Maps#Network_and_node_pointsAuf dem Golsfjell orientiert man sich im Sommer und Winter mit getrennten Knotenpunktensystemen. Ich wollte mal schauen, ob die Renderer sc... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-24 17:47:18 UTC | mueschel | Dann ist ja in Ordnung - du hattest im changeset Kommentar nur lwn geschrieben, da lag die Vermutung nahe :) | |
| 58348798 by Cavokld | 1 | 2018-04-24 11:03:07 UTC | mueschel | Hi,on 4 ways you added the tag "TypeGenealogieMDO" - was that a mistake?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-25 10:42:36 UTC | Cavokld | Oui c'était une erreur. C'est corrigé !Merci | |
| 58301324 by Night-Lord | 1 | 2018-04-23 10:52:59 UTC | mueschel | Hi,wenn die Brücke für PKW befahrbar ist, ist highway=path aber nicht richtig. Schaust du da mal nach?Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-23 15:15:20 UTC | Night-Lord | also dem openstreet Wiki ist es richtig weil ich temporary eingetragen habehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional)Example 5: Cycleway closed for construction workA cycleway will be closed for construction work. Suppose the cycleway is tagged as follows:\... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-23 15:19:13 UTC | Night-Lord | danach habe ich mich gerichtet wenn das falsch ist sollte es im Wiki auch mal Aktualisiert werden. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-23 15:28:49 UTC | mueschel | Deine temporary-Tags sind völlig in Ordnung. Aber ein highway=secondary wird nicht zum highway=path nur weil es eine Baustelle ist. Das Beispiel im Wiki ist für einen Radweg, der ohnehin schon ein highway=path ist. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-23 15:46:05 UTC | Night-Lord | oki dann änder ich das, danke für den Hinweis :) | |
| 58323492 by sadeepta dh | 1 | 2018-04-23 10:55:37 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added the tag "student:counts" to two schools - the correct spelling would be "student:count".Could you check and fix these tags? Thanks, Jan |
| 58280873 by liuxingy2017 | 1 | 2018-04-23 10:42:27 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I noticed many new and undocumented "payment" tags. Please use only the documented tags, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:paymentThanks, Jan |
| 58287161 by Freiheitsstute | 1 | 2018-04-23 10:39:51 UTC | mueschel | Hi,kannst du mal nach dem Tagging schauen? "recycling:exc" sieht nach einem Fehler aus.Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-23 21:21:02 UTC | Freiheitsstute | Ja, danke! Ist jetzt geändert. Da scheint mir leider ein Vertipper durchgerutscht zu sein - bei den vielen Müll-Arten irgendwie auch kein Wunder. :\\Gruß, Rolf | |
| 58291165 by serdrar tazarine | 1 | 2018-04-22 10:31:27 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM.Here you used two tags which are new and not used in any other place.This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understandit. Only tags that are described in the OSM-Wiki can be used. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58... |
| 51937053 by anonym33 | 1 | 2018-04-22 10:14:45 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,3 Wegstücke haben jetzt zwei access:conditional tags, unter anderem dieser: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447013725Welcher davon stimmt? access:conditional = no @ (Nov-May) access:conditional_1 = no @ (oct-may)Gruß, Jan |
| 58287038 by Victoire Séne | 1 | 2018-04-22 10:11:59 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added 43 nodes with the tag "Arbre = yes". Please note that all keys you use to identify an object needs to be in English -everything else is not understood by the software and is not shown on maps.I guess you meant to use "natural = tree", see the Wiki: https:... |
| 58279150 by Jim Schmidt | 1 | 2018-04-21 10:14:39 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added 409 objects with the tag"Uploaded=56". This looks like a mistake.Could you have a look and fix this?Jan |
| 57167092 by KABIRAJ ROKAYA | 1 | 2018-03-15 10:42:28 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you uploaded 165 objects with strange tags. Could you check and fix this?AltMode=-1Base=0.0FolderPath=VCA-Nilkantha_VSO_Nepal.kmz/VCA-Nilkantha/Utilities/WATER BODIESHasLabel=-1LabelID=3Name=Paani muhan -ChilaunaboteOID_=0SymbolID=2 |
| 2 | 2018-04-20 17:54:53 UTC | mueschel | I removed the remaining useless tags like Base and AltMode. | |
| 58245350 by susinita | 1 | 2018-04-20 10:52:11 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!Here are a few remarks:- please watch out for the correct spelling of tags, e.g. it's 'right', not 'rigt' and 'smoothness', not 'smothness'. I fixed several of these right now.- I found several nodes with the tags kerb, kerb:both, kerb:left and kerb:right on the same n... |
| 2 | 2018-04-20 21:33:11 UTC | susinita | oh lord! Jan, I am soo sorry! really.I am completely new. Sorry for not pay attention enough... It has been completely my fault. (thank you for correcting me) | |
| 57920008 by johanespeter9 | 1 | 2018-04-15 12:22:53 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this changeset contains some tags with spelling mistakes. First of all, all tags, keys and values should use lower case letters. (Names do use upper case of course)addr:Distirct -> addr:district (note the spelling mistake)addr:Village -> addr:villagebuilding:condition=Moderate -&g... |
| 2 | 2018-04-19 18:20:17 UTC | mueschel | I started removing spelling mistakes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58240787 | |
| 58128582 by 6-ofps-tuapse | 1 | 2018-04-19 10:37:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi, could you check the tagging of this way?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372094840There are some strange fire-related tags.Thanks, Jan |
| 58175157 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-04-19 09:39:43 UTC | Nakaner | Hallo mueschel,meines Wissens nach haben UIC-Nummern einen anderen Aufbau als "de:08119:5960", oder? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4447883498/historyViele GrüßeMichael |
| 2 | 2018-04-19 09:55:15 UTC | mueschel | Hallo Michael,das ist durchaus möglich. Diese Ergänzungen müssen ohnehin noch einmal überprüft werden, die Quelle kommt mir fragwürdig vor:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58181024Jan | |
| 58165877 by Shamillah | 1 | 2018-04-18 08:00:30 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found the tag "health_professional=no" on many objects - what does it mean? This key has not been used in any other place yet.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 12:44:34 UTC | Shamillah | Hello Jan,that means that the health facilities in that area do not have a health professional.Shamillah | |
| 3 | 2018-04-18 13:05:44 UTC | mueschel | Could you search for an established tag for this information? Otherwise this information is lost for all users who don't know this tag.health_person:type=* might be a good choice.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0#health_person:type.3D.2A_.2F_office.3D.2A | |
| 4 | 2018-04-18 14:12:39 UTC | Shamillah | Sure thing Jan. Will discuss with my team and make appropriate changes. Thank you for the insight :) | |
| 57886376 by NickNicky | 1 | 2018-04-18 11:32:59 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,hast du eine schriftliche Genehmigung vom VVM um diese Daten zu verwenden? In OSM dürfen nur Daten verwendet werden, die unter einer mit ODbL kompatiblen Lizenz stehen. Das ist hier laut Webseite nicht der Fall. |
| 58181024 by NickNicky | 1 | 2018-04-18 11:30:51 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,hast du eine schriftliche Genehmigung von bwegt.de um diese Daten zu verwenden? In OSM dürfen nur Daten verwendet werden, die unter einer mit ODbL kompatiblen Lizenz stehen. Das ist hier laut Webseite nicht der Fall. |
| 58181130 by Svein Olav | 1 | 2018-04-18 08:02:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi,all these objects have tags like "Source:date = 20130720" - in general, keys should be lower case and the date should be in a common format like"source:date = 2013-07-20" Would you mind changing that?Jan |
| 58159205 by ashmapper | 1 | 2018-04-18 07:59:04 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found the (only) tag "huts = yes" on several objects - what does that mean? This tag is not used by anybody else at the moment.Thanks, Jan |
| 58127396 by poornibadrinath | 1 | 2018-04-17 17:25:53 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you and your colleagues add nodes like this:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5555758243These should not appear in OSM. I suspect there is some error in your common workflow when doing QA. Could you please check this?Jan |
| 58092691 by Reclus | 1 | 2018-04-17 13:11:18 UTC | mueschel | Hi,kannst du hier mal nach dem Tagging schauen, das sieht nach einem Fehler aus:"building:black = good"https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579894123Jan |
| 58136210 by Pitoresker Pi | 1 | 2018-04-17 09:10:32 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,du hast hier zwei Tags benutzt, die es so bisher nicht gibt, ref:color_bg und ref:color_tx. Ich würde empfehlen, auf "osmc:symbol" zurückzugreifen - das wird insbesondere bei Symbolen auf Wegweisern verwendet, und es gibt Anwendungen die das unterstützen. |
| 58152040 by Max-- | 1 | 2018-04-17 09:07:46 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added the key "arialway" on 58 objects - could you fix the spelling mistake, it should be "aerialway".Grüße,Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-17 13:24:32 UTC | Max-- | Oh, what a stupid typo, did not spot it while reapplying the key those 58 times in JOSM. Should have fixed all of them now, but will make sure I check later!Gruss,Max | |
| 3 | 2018-04-18 09:46:24 UTC | Max-- | Checked it with overpass-turbo, no more arialways left....Thanks for spotting it! | |
| 58132388 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-04-16 11:47:35 UTC | Tomas Straupis | Reverted. name->waterway:name was done on purpose because at this point it is a reservoir, not a stream/river. |
| 2 | 2018-04-16 12:02:13 UTC | mueschel | At all other lakes I know the usual "name" and "alt_name" tags are used. What is your reason to use other tags here? If it is just to avoid displaying the name on the map, this is "mapping for the renderer" and heavily discouraged.Your tags are not documented anywhe... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-16 12:08:58 UTC | Tomas Straupis | I've already added a local (Lithuanian) rule so that streams/rivers should not have name tag when intersecting natural=water, looking at what happens and planning to extend this to landuse=reservoir.Reason is that there is no stream/river at that point, name is not required (because lake/reservoir... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-16 12:19:39 UTC | mueschel | That's exactly what Drafts are for in the Wiki - describing what you intent to do so that other mappers can comment on it. I'm not sure that all users of this data agree with your point of view. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-16 12:27:27 UTC | Tomas Straupis | Well we (Lithuanian mappers) are discussing it in pubs... I've added a lot of river/stream ways to connect water basins, this introduced duplicate names, so I'm looking for the ways to solve this. Alternative would be to remove waterway=river/stream tag altogether. Or removing name tag.As per wiki... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-16 12:37:13 UTC | mueschel | I'm not a user of river and stream data, so I can't say something specific. Only thing I know is that OSM is an international project and all changes to tagging need to be discussed openly with everybody involved. A pub is not the right place, that's why we have the Wiki, whether you like it or not.... | |
| 7 | 2018-04-16 13:05:41 UTC | Tomas Straupis | I have explained which problems I'm solving. I need other specific/practical problems to be able to adjust my decisions. This is the reason why I'm doing a change and waiting for a loooong time for other possible problems to rise. | |
| 34638163 by Papilli | 1 | 2018-04-16 12:13:57 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this highway? The tag "waterway:name" looks suspicious.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210083669Jan |
| 58065163 by Sia Saronga | 1 | 2018-04-16 10:28:54 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!I saw some uncommon tags in your edits like these: Building Age = Recent (post 2000) Name of City = Dar es Salaam Name of the ward = Kigogo Steet Name = MkwajuniIn OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data... |
| 58042058 by guillemmal | 1 | 2018-04-16 09:51:57 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this waterway? The tag 'brie=yes' looks like a mistake.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579345704Cheers, Jan |
| 58107825 by zVID | 1 | 2018-04-16 09:11:55 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I saw that you added tags likeheight:2017.06 = 0,9 to trees and hedges.I do have a few comments on that:- dates have to be given as "YYYY-MM-DD", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Date_namespace- the decimal separator is a dot: "0.9"- ther... |
| 58024958 by UncleHank | 1 | 2018-04-15 15:12:42 UTC | mueschel | Hi,there are two ways that got the tag "revf = CR 1654" - this looks like a mistake, could you check that?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-15 21:22:38 UTC | UncleHank | You are correct. It was a mistake. That's what I get when I work on these maps late at night. | |
| 58061915 by Anicet Gabé | 1 | 2018-04-15 14:25:39 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used a strange tag on some of these nodes: "_Localisation_de_la_structure_precision". Could you explain what it means? |
| 57993964 by dikkeknodel | 1 | 2018-04-15 14:24:07 UTC | mueschel | Could you check this butcher? Something went wrong with the name tag.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-16 09:57:20 UTC | dikkeknodel | Indeed, something went wrong. I've restored the name.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225609532 | |
| 57907852 by Cooking 15610 | 1 | 2018-04-13 10:47:48 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "borne = yes" here - this is new. What does it mean?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-14 08:33:38 UTC | Cooking 15610 | Hello, Sorry, my english is rather bad. It was installed a long time ago in purpose to prevent cars to go this way (Caen to Bretteville sur Odon)Cheers | |
| 3 | 2018-04-14 15:01:35 UTC | mueschel | I didn't know the word "borne" and Google Translate also didn't...I think "barrier = bollard" is what you are looking for, seehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard | |
| 4 | 2018-04-14 18:25:15 UTC | Cooking 15610 | This is exactly what you think. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-14 18:26:17 UTC | mueschel | Perfect, I'll change the tag.Happy mapping! | |
| 58073101 by DMyriam1990 | 1 | 2018-04-14 18:23:49 UTC | mueschel | Hi, you used the tag "sourcename" on this road - the correct key would be "source:name". I fixed it right now.Cheers, Jan |
| 58018610 by valerietheblonde | 1 | 2018-04-14 14:52:34 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you have imported some ways with only foreign tags. Could you check that?E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579046367 |
| 57961440 by sergey2psch | 1 | 2018-04-13 13:06:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found several hydrants with the tag "sostoyanie =исправен" - this looks like a mistake. Maybe "working=yes" would be a replacement?Jan |
| 49067413 by frederic ademola | 1 | 2017-06-03 13:43:07 UTC | mueschel | Hi,these wells contain quite some foreign tags. E.g. lon and lat should not appear as tags in OSM, keys should not use capital letters. Could you have a look and correct this?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-13 11:12:00 UTC | mueschel | I deleted those tags now. | |
| 57910336 by jengelh | 1 | 2018-04-13 10:53:27 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,wie kann das Dach hier "abandoned" sein? Da wurde doch nicht unter einem verfallenen Dach ein neues Haus gebaut?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89564186Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-13 11:17:02 UTC | jengelh | in der Tat, hier ist removed: nötig | |
| 55993913 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-04-12 13:35:42 UTC | M!dgard | Hello mueschel,You're changing the key `static_caravans` to `static_caravan` here. I had chosen the plural to match `tents` and `caravans`. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site . This page also lists `static_caravans` (because I added it there when I mapped these camp ... |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 13:54:21 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I changed static_caravans to static_caravan because the plural wasn't in the database before you added it and the singular was already used 170 times. Looking closer into it, it looks like the singular key was used to describe a type of building, not camp site features.So, let's use the p... | |
| 57891241 by Uwenr5 | 1 | 2018-04-12 13:05:43 UTC | mueschel | Hi,what are the parkings like these actually:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577420145/history- there are no keys like "car_parking" or "motorcycle_parking"- first you put a bicycle parking tag there.Can you write what these 2 areas are actually? (Du kannst gerne ... |
| 57939650 by Dr-Mx | 1 | 2018-04-12 09:12:09 UTC | mueschel | Hi,the tag "naptan:locality_name" is new to OSM. We do already have a larger number of "naptan:Locality" which seems to be the same. Maybe you can change these tags?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 11:47:29 UTC | Dr-Mx | Thanks Jan, that one slipped through the net. I appreciate your time to check. Done. | |
| 57978119 by jsmitsodiliapeel | 1 | 2018-04-12 09:09:46 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check these nodes? They got the tag "navigatinaid" instead of "navigationaid".Jan |
| 57959549 by nammala | 1 | 2018-04-11 18:25:46 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you uploaded 59 nodes with very strange tags - they dom't look lime they belong into the database, e.g.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3667974021Could you fix these?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 03:30:16 UTC | nammala | Hi mueschel,I think this was caused due to fixing of Minor highways through JOSM validator. Will look into those and fix them. Thanks for pointing the issue.Regards,nammala | |
| 57920245 by Svein Olav | 1 | 2018-04-09 09:13:53 UTC | mueschel | Hiyou uploaded 50 ways with only foreign tags which looks like a mistake.http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577831441Could you have a look and fix this?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-09 16:15:48 UTC | Svein Olav | HiThank You.That was a tidying job i import from shapefile that went wrong.- but I found only 28 ways.Do You find any more, please advise my search. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-09 16:44:58 UTC | mueschel | Hi,28 seems right, I don't know why I read / wrote 50.Thanks for taking care!Jan | |
| 44552697 by Pikari | 1 | 2018-04-09 13:01:55 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added 4 nodes with the tag "traffic_sign:s" - this looks like a mistake. Could you check it? Example:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4564258644Cheers, Jan |
| 57880918 by Seungow | 1 | 2018-04-09 12:58:52 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way? I don't know what "biv = yes" means.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577322675Jan |
| 57852177 by cronoser | 1 | 2018-04-09 10:52:18 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "socket:combo" here - this type of socket is new. Could you check which one it actually is? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Asocket |
| 2 | 2018-05-20 08:50:29 UTC | cronoser | Ok, I will check it | |
| 57833480 by 124millionpixels | 1 | 2018-04-09 10:07:35 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of this way? It doesn't have any valid tags.Jan |
| 57925544 by MapPYOSM CarmenWendell | 1 | 2018-04-09 09:15:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you uploaded another 281 ways with the tag "landcouver" - this should be "landcover". Could you have a look and fix this?Thanks, Jan |
| 57910617 by gscscnd | 1 | 2018-04-09 09:11:37 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you're using the tags "maxspeed:backward:type" and "maxspeed:forward:type" here - usually the order is "maxspeed:type:backward", because 'type' is a sub-key and 'backward' is a suffix. Would you have a look and change it to the common order?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-09 10:23:09 UTC | gscscnd | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57936427Fixed, thanks for reminding! | |
| 57846035 by MapPYOSM CarmenWendell | 1 | 2018-04-06 09:04:25 UTC | mueschel | Hi,on these 182 ways you added the tag "landcouver" - this should be "landcover". Could you have a look and fix this?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-08 13:00:47 UTC | mueschel | I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57912710 | |
| 57866303 by 77TC - Denali | 1 | 2018-04-08 09:56:13 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you invented 3 new tags "DTP ", "DTP", "Dtp" here. Could you explain what these mean?Please keep in mind that OSM tags are case sensitive and whitespace matters.Jan |
| 57771161 by grhum59 | 1 | 2018-04-04 20:11:32 UTC | VlIvYur | HelloYour Shift key stuck |
| 2 | 2018-04-05 07:36:34 UTC | grhum59 | Sorry, that comes from a database made by my communication department. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-07 15:58:39 UTC | mueschel | That means it is an import of data? The source is not "knowledge"?Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GuidelinesAlso, the tagging has to be revised, tags like object_id, type = AUTRE, horaires:FR, longitude, latitude should not appear in OSM and have to be remove... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-09 10:06:48 UTC | grhum59 | Well ! Sorry for the bad tagging.It was my first time, I tried to do my best, but my best was not good.I correct the bad tags after deblocking my caps lock key.I also put phone tag with international formatI hope this is better now | |
| 57724391 by Hernan | 1 | 2018-04-06 09:55:21 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check your preset / default values / scripts? There is a typo: "glacier:e1e_bottom" instead of "glacier:ele_bottom" (a "one" instead of the letter L)Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-06 10:38:43 UTC | Hernan | Thank you very much for the warning. It is already correctedregardsHernan | |
| 57727674 by Keith | 1 | 2018-04-02 13:15:28 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you introduced some new tags on several national parks. Could you explain their meaning? AUTHORITY = WA_DPAW PA_ID = WA_31362 RES_NUMBER = WA31362Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-02 14:08:34 UTC | Keith | Hope this helps,Item Name: PA_IDField Type: Alphanumeric (maximum 20 characters) (Upper – Lower case)Definition: A unique code for the protected area that doesn’t change between versions of CAPADNote: In some cases this number will be generated by the DOEE, for DOEE data, other... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-02 14:37:07 UTC | mueschel | Such external reference numbers are usually not part of the data in OSM. Please write a description in the Wiki so that every mapper can understand what they are.Also consider to use an established format for the keys, such as ref:capad. Actually, there are already some objects with a capad numb... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-02 15:52:15 UTC | Keith | It has to referenced as source by the uploader to identify that the data set is legally been obtained under the (CC BY 3.0 AU) licence. I have spoken to someone else about this (in au) and the "source" of the data set is the Federal and State governments. If I get time I will put it in th... | |
| 5 | 2018-04-03 06:42:51 UTC | aharvey | I agree with @mueschel that we should be using the `ref` key https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref for external references. So ref:capad or something like that.The description of the AUTHORITY field sounds like it should go into the OSM operator tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-03 10:07:43 UTC | Keith | Actually I will remove all reference to any further fields, saves time. | |
| 7 | 2018-04-06 09:51:39 UTC | mueschel | What are we going to do with the existing res_num, pa_id, Res_num, RES_NUMBER, PA_ID tags? Delete? | |
| 8 | 2018-04-06 10:36:04 UTC | Keith | As far as I know i have deleted the tags. I will check and act accordingly. | |
| 9 | 2018-04-06 10:50:00 UTC | Keith | Deleted 5 days ago. | |
| 57774559 by CamcycleMatt | 1 | 2018-04-05 16:03:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "inclusive = no" on several barriers, what is the meaning of this tag?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-05 16:17:24 UTC | CamcycleMatt | I'm investigating some ideas for annotating problematic barriers installed on cycle routes that exclude people riding adapted cycles, tricycles or recumbent cycles. Hopefully this can eventually become a searchable database based on OSM. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-05 17:32:41 UTC | mueschel | "inclusive" is not actually a "speaking tag" - it could be anything. What is the exact width when you start using this tag? what about bicycles with trailers?I would recommend to stay with the established tagging schemes: You can always use a "maxwidth" tag - this car... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-05 17:53:47 UTC | CamcycleMatt | Thank you for the suggestion.Sorry that I also forgot to mention cycles with trailers. Inclusive is meant to capture the full range of pedal cycle-type vehicles. I realise that is a fairly vague category, however it is an issue here. For practical purposes I usually refer people to Highways Engl... | |
| 5 | 2018-04-05 20:08:03 UTC | mueschel | Barriers like this exist almost everywhere. As you describe there are many different kinds of obstacles that hinder users of one or more specific kinds of vehicles. I fully agree that this is important information to include in OSM, but I'm sure that you need a much more specific tagging with many m... | |
| 51568561 by berjk | 1 | 2017-09-04 19:26:07 UTC | mueschel | Welchen Zweck haben denn diese "Hilfspunkte"? Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 23:55:20 UTC | berjk | Ich habe einen Bekannten, der hat auf einer alten Karte von Hand die alte Grenze zwischen Kirchdorf eingezeichnet.Durch abpausen und übertragen sind dann die Hilfspunkte entstanden, in der Hoffnung, dass man dort alte Straßen im Ort und alte Feldweg außerorts dann finden kann.Da... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-04 23:56:04 UTC | berjk | Anm: da war ja einer mal richtig schnell! | |
| 4 | 2018-03-24 23:55:08 UTC | berjk | Ist es technisch möglich, dass nur ich diese Hilfspunkte nur für mich ersichtlich sind? Ich kann mir vorstellen, dass andere, d.h. die die Grenze nicht bearbeiten wollen, nichts mit diesen Hilfspunkten anfangen können und ebenfalls irritiert sind. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-03 11:47:35 UTC | mueschel | In iD geht das so weit ich weiß nicht. Mit JOSM ist es kein Problem, du kannst beliebig Daten in/aus lokalen Dateien speichern und laden, so dass du sie siehst, sie aber nicht auf dem Server landen. | |
| 57753184 by Hendrikklaas | 1 | 2018-04-03 09:22:34 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you might want to change 149 times 'souuce' to 'source'.Cheers, Jan |
| 57675286 by nodge | 1 | 2018-04-01 12:57:35 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,ist das richtig, dass dieser Kaffeeladen jetzt ein Fahrradladen ist?Und was heißen denn diese beiden Tags:service:bicycle:cake \tyesservice:bicycle:coffee \tyesGruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-01 17:14:38 UTC | nodge | Hi Jan! Der Laden ist eigentlich beides. Cafe mit Kuchen und Fahrradladen mit Werkstatt... haste ne bessere Idee?Grüße! Martin | |
| 3 | 2018-04-01 17:18:36 UTC | mueschel | Hi,dann war shop = coffee (verkauft Kaffeebohnen) nicht richtig, es hätte amenity = cafe (schenkt Kaffee aus) sein müssen.Wir haben keine Möglichkeit, zwei so verschiedene Dinge an einem Knoten zu taggen. Deswegen würde ich hier vorschlagen, zwei getrennte Punkte anzulegen ... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-01 17:20:09 UTC | nodge | Gute Idee. Ich bau das so um! Danke!! | |
| 57650237 by goodidea | 1 | 2018-04-01 13:58:25 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,du schreibst "Als Quelle für den Umriss der Passage und alle indoor-Räume usw. diente der Plan, der an einigen Eingänge steht"Dass ein Plan öffentlich aushängt heißt nicht, dass er frei verwendbar ist. Hast du die Lizenz überprüft, bzw. ... |
| 2 | 2018-04-02 12:37:57 UTC | goodidea | Sorry, war eine falscher Comment bei dem Änderungssatz. Ich habe den Plan doch nicht benutzen müssen. Es ging auch so. | |
| 57667268 by Malhado | 1 | 2018-04-01 13:08:28 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this road? It got the tag "ones = yes".https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44098440Jan |
| 57666163 by danvyr | 1 | 2018-04-01 12:54:58 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this waterway got a strange tag, could you check that?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574814527Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-01 13:17:27 UTC | danvyr | Hi, it's mistake with copy-pasteI fixed it | |
| 57650789 by nodnerb | 1 | 2018-04-01 12:51:57 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "w2g = yes" on several objects, could you explain what it means?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-03 06:52:58 UTC | nodnerb | Sorry it was an error of judgement. I have adopted checked=w2g to remind me of my on site survey versus a satellite image | |
| 57637016 by usbe | 1 | 2018-04-01 12:49:31 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this way got several access tags, which aren't right. Could you explain what the actual access rules are? I guess it can easily be tagged with access:conditional=*Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-07-02 11:54:47 UTC | corfede | Ciao usbe, cosa intendevi mappare con tutti quegli access:hour_off/on? Come suggerito da mueschel eventualmente dovresti usare access:conditional=* o meglio motor_vehicle:conditional=* se l'accesso condizionale è riferito solo ai veicoli a motore. Grazie, Federico. | |
| 57646705 by vnsnt | 1 | 2018-04-01 12:37:52 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like something went wrong here, there are several peaks with strange tags like elevation=717.98 hj_name=露積峰 index_no=3485 lon=126-58-38.35 lot=37-39-12.28 type=표고점These don't look like they should be in OSM. Could you check that?Jan |
| 57673400 by Luxus8 | 1 | 2018-03-31 10:24:02 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I saw that you added some destination signs here. One remark: You used the tags destination:to:arrow and destination:to:symbol while the usual order is destination:arrow:to and destination:symbol:toCheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-04-01 08:58:11 UTC | Luxus8 | Hi Jan,thanks for the tip. Will make sure to correct it. I am trying to understand how the directions system works, this was my first attempt. Have to say that the syntax is a bit confusing on this point though, not completely clear why a certain order should be used. I guess I should study ... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-01 10:02:11 UTC | mueschel | I also missed a clear description, so I made my own. In general the order of almost everything is key[:subkey][:hgv|:bicycle|...][:lanes][:forward|:backward|:both_ways][:conditional][:start|:end]=*https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging | |
| 4 | 2018-04-01 10:58:12 UTC | Luxus8 | I see I have used your page when doing this, didn't realize :) Great work! Will dive into that again for the next time.I want to see if I can add some more directions in and around Eindhoven, seems that that is mostly not there yet. Can you recommend some tools for checking the results or maybe ... | |
| 5 | 2018-04-01 11:21:47 UTC | mueschel | For JOSM I only know about the "LaneAttributes" preset which helps a bit to quickly enter the most important attributes. | |
| 57685732 by johanespeter9 | 1 | 2018-04-01 10:39:01 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you introduced a huge number of new tags in this changeset, which have not been used in any other place and which are not documented. Please spend some time reading the Wiki to find out how these features have to be mapped so that they can be understood by software and are for example shown on ... |
| 2 | 2018-04-08 15:08:24 UTC | bgirardot | @mueschel Thank you very much for the heads up. We are follow up on this now. Very much appreciated. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-09 12:14:33 UTC | bgirardot | @mueschel This appears to have been a mistake in uploading data to OSM. We asked the DWG to revert this. So a number of these tags are not intended to be part of OSM data.Again, thank you for flagging it for us. | |
| 50615944 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-03-31 15:14:16 UTC | borazslo | Helló!Látom az url:miserend-ekből csináltál website:miserendet. Légyszi, ha lehet ne. Lásd itten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Hungary/Katolikus_Templomok |
| 2 | 2018-03-31 15:18:10 UTC | mueschel | Hi,sorry, I don't speak Hungarian. The two objects had the tag "url:", not "url:miserend". | |
| 3 | 2018-03-31 15:23:58 UTC | borazslo | Hi, The Church (way/217211125) had an "url:" tag and an "url:miserend" as well. Both were changed. (You can see the website:miserend as well.) I working on a project with the Hungarian catholic churches and we need our 'url:miserend' when it is possible. If you used a script to... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-31 15:26:26 UTC | mueschel | Yes sure, if this is a documented tag, feel free to use it. | |
| 57174106 by upendrakarukonda | 1 | 2018-03-15 10:40:39 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you uploaded 1335 ways which overlap with already existing ones and have a tag like @id=way/569535515Could you check and fix that?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-28 09:58:31 UTC | mueschel | When are you going to fix this? I don't see why volunteers have to clean the mess created by professionals who are paid for the job! | |
| 3 | 2018-03-30 11:35:27 UTC | mueschel | This changeset was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57657580 | |
| 55773048 by 351293 | 1 | 2018-03-28 17:15:06 UTC | mueschel | Kannst du etwas hierzu sagen:https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1340960Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-28 18:23:31 UTC | 351293 | Danke für den Hinweis | |
| 57580124 by arcth | 1 | 2018-03-28 09:51:52 UTC | mueschel | Hi,the tag "tower:observation:forest_fire=yes" is new and not used in other places.We do have some "observation = firewatch" in the database. Maybe you want to change your tag? Cheers, Jan |
| 57525644 by brianboru | 1 | 2018-03-27 21:48:41 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the tagging of this node:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/267741447Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-28 06:37:25 UTC | brianboru | Thanks Jan. How did I manage to enter that gibberish on the post box! Now corrected. Good to know someone's doing QABrian | |
| 57530192 by цукссс123 | 1 | 2018-03-27 08:11:12 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this import of fire hydrants contains many Russian tags - could you translate them to common ones? Remember that all tags have to use the documented, English names. A list of tags can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrantJan |
| 57537093 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-03-27 00:08:31 UTC | Tesla | Removing the correct information is not OK |
| 2 | 2018-03-27 07:49:03 UTC | mueschel | I consider passwords of any kind private information that does not belong into the OSM database. I'm very sure, the offer of free wifi is for customers of this restaurant, but not for any person finding the key on the internet. Did you check with the owner that he is fine with sharing this informati... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-27 09:17:16 UTC | Tesla | Thank you for answer. I wrote you a direct message earlier explaining everything in detail. Besides SSID is not private and there is no reason to remove it. Also note the tag is called key, not password. It serves different purpose. Thank you! | |
| 57492185 by hans fries | 1 | 2018-03-26 13:59:18 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,willkommen bei OSM! Bitte nimm dir etwas Zeit und lies im Wiki wie Objekte mit Tags versehen werden müssen. Es dürfen nur solche Tags verwendet werden, wie sie dokumentiert sind. Alles andere kann keine Software auswerten.Z.B. diese Informationen sind zur Zeit nicht nutzbar:G... |
| 57465512 by Federico Maciel Pozzolo | 1 | 2018-03-25 17:05:46 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I can't make sense of the tag "valor = pasta" on this shop:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459236292Is that a mistake?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-26 15:50:46 UTC | Federico Maciel Pozzolo | Hi Jan, I'm sorry, my mistake, has already been solved (tag "shop = pasta").Thank you very much. | |
| 57437158 by Paul Johnson | 1 | 2018-03-24 16:21:44 UTC | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong with the name tag here, could you check that?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238362209Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-24 17:21:24 UTC | Paul Johnson | Nice catch. Fixed! | |
| 57335513 by Dartmouthmapmaker | 1 | 2018-03-23 10:01:42 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you please point me to the Wiki page detailing this import? It looks like it generates lots of problems. - There is a huge amount of foreign tags which shouldn't appear in OSM (like "Shape_Length")- I found "parks" consisting of a two nodes about 10 cm apart- I... |
| 2 | 2018-03-23 12:41:09 UTC | Dartmouthmapmaker | These are from HRM open data - what I did is delete the foreign tag which came along the importing it through JSOM | |
| 3 | 2018-03-23 12:45:05 UTC | Dartmouthmapmaker | Thanks for point this out | |
| 4 | 2018-03-23 12:45:11 UTC | mueschel | Did you read the guidelines for importing data from other sources?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines | |
| 57367325 by GITNE | 1 | 2018-03-22 10:48:36 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,bzgl. deiner "note:motor_vehicle:conditional:forward": Ja, die Syntax des Wertes ist in Ordnung, der Key sollte aber "motor_vehicle:forward:conditional" sein - die Reihenfolge von Suffixen ist allgemeinkey[:subkey][:hgv|:bicycle|...][:lanes][:forward|:backward|:both... |
| 2 | 2018-03-22 16:07:35 UTC | GITNE | Hallo @mueschel,danke für den Hinweis. Es war mir nicht klar, dass man sich auf eine allgemeine Unterschlüsselreihenfolge geeinigt hat. Kannst du mir bitte einen Verweis im Wiki geben, wo das festgelegt ist (natürlich ausgenommen deine Seite, obwohl sie die ganze Thematik sehr gut... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-22 16:19:45 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,nein, da gibt es keine gute Übersicht, deswegen habe ich meine Seite ja geschrieben. Ich bin dabei von den spärlichen, spezifischen Angaben im Wiki ausgegangen und den Häufigkeiten der einzelnen Keys laut Taginfo. Der Datenbestand ist relativ sauber was die Reihenfolge angeh... | |
| 57351602 by shirokazan | 1 | 2018-03-22 10:53:14 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this school? The tag "ks" looks like a mistake.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31348937Jan |
| 57228005 by PierZen | 1 | 2018-03-20 16:30:05 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "designation:ca" on two relations - I don't think this is right. ':ca' is the suffix for Catalan language and the value seems to be French.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-20 16:53:05 UTC | PierZen | Confusion between the iso CA and language ca. Corrected. | |
| 57330511 by Dyrektor Niewykonawczy Damian Taciak | 1 | 2018-03-20 16:15:32 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/571100560'maxspeed:p' looks like a mistake.Cheers, Jan |
| 57303081 by Stephen L Arnold | 1 | 2018-03-20 12:06:02 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of the tags APBP_approved and aPBP_approved ? These are new and not used in other places.Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-20 18:46:54 UTC | Stephen L Arnold | They should all be APBP_approved. I will fix the broken ones.The Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (a U.S. organization) recommends that a rack support a bicycle in two places, so a kick stand is not required. So the common wave and comb racks do not qualify. We'd like all respo... | |
| 57291905 by !i! | 1 | 2018-03-20 11:46:51 UTC | mueschel | Moin,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/706714156wind = yesMeinst du monitoring:wind = yes? |
| 2 | 2018-07-24 11:52:53 UTC | Mammi71 | Hallo,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570685120Hat dieses separate Wegstück einen bestimmten Grund (Neubau) oder versehentlich kopiert und hochgeladen?Der Mammi | |
| 3 | 2018-07-28 07:26:36 UTC | !i! | Moin, entschuldige bitte die verspätete Reaktion.Das ist ein altes Stück Weg, was (formell) auch nicht mehr mit dem neuen Teil verbunden war. Wenn es dich stört, kannst du es gerne auch noch verbinden, da es mit einem Sprung durchaus erreichbar ist. | |
| 57257023 by VLD016 | 1 | 2018-03-20 10:29:02 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I noticed several objects with tags like Lint_reviewlibt_reviewline_reviewlinr_reviewlint_reviewlInt_reviewCould you explain what this means? Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-20 16:14:44 UTC | RVR002 | Thank you for your comment and pointing me to this. It seems as though these are misspellings from the editors, meant for us to double check some of the decisions. I will fix these right away and make sure to clarify this with the team. Thanks again-Jeff | |
| 57306813 by Sarjan Shahi | 1 | 2018-03-20 10:14:18 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like something went wrong here. These lines all have no valid tags, just some imported ones. They seem to resemble administrative borders, but these are already mapped with much higher precision. Can these lines be deleted?Jan |
| 57335323 by ChrissW-R1 | 1 | 2018-03-20 10:08:48 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,der Tag 'nickname:XX' ist neu und nirgendswo in Benutzung. Wenn es ein lokal bekannter Name wäre, wäre "loc_name" korrekt. Ich bezweifele aber sehr, dass z.B. Rostock einen vietnamesischen Kosenamen hat. Außerdem sind Namenszusätze wie "Hansestadt"... |
| 57255047 by ndm | 1 | 2018-03-17 16:47:40 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this node? The tag 'sheno' looks like a mistake.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/485403860Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-17 20:20:32 UTC | ndm | shelter=no | |
| 57196902 by Youhee | 1 | 2018-03-17 13:54:37 UTC | mueschel | Hi,what is a "wheelchair park"? It doesn't look like there is any park on this side of the building.Jan |
| 57201193 by ChrisCatta | 1 | 2018-03-16 12:04:50 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the key 'année' on several ways - this key is new and not used in other places. What does it mean? It could be 'start_date' or 'check_date' which are common.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-18 18:18:39 UTC | ChrisCatta | Hi,Sorry for that, it's a mistake, I use "année" for private information on piece of forest for my friend but normaly in my own osm file that i don't upload on openstreet map.I delete this key for the waysorry for my poor englishCordialementChristian | |
| 57184674 by geri-oc | 1 | 2018-03-15 15:43:46 UTC | mueschel | Moin,'vvo_id' sollte wohl besser 'ref:vvo' heißen, das würde der gängigen Praxis entsprechen. Der Tag "qr_code" ist wohl auch überflüssig, es gibt ja schon "website" und der angegebene Link führt auch nicht zu einem qr code.Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-15 16:20:38 UTC | geri-oc | Hallo Jan,zu qr_code hatten wir schon einmal diskutiert. Da war es als besser befunden statt qr_code=yes (oder dem Bild) gleich den Link anzugeben.ref:vvo=* sollte die Linienummer beinhalten. Die vvo_id= nutze ich für die Haltestellennummer, da die internatinale uic_id nicht bekannt ist.\... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-15 16:34:21 UTC | mueschel | "ref:vvo=* sollte die Linienummer beinhalten." - Nein, die Liniennummer wird in der Regel gar nicht an der Haltestelle angegeben (da entsprechende Relationen existieren). Wenn doch gibt es dafür "route_ref".Undiskutierte Ideen von Mentz als Vorlage zu nehmen halte ich f... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-15 16:56:36 UTC | geri-oc | Da aber viele Relationen nicht aktuell sind finde ich schon richtig die Linie an der Haltestelle anzugeben.Ich finde es besser, wenn ich an der Haltestelle weitere Informationen erhalte, als wenn ich erst Relationen oder anderes zu suchen. Relationen C und D stimmen garantiert nicht mehr, die F ... | |
| 57145213 by Suadu12 | 1 | 2018-03-15 15:53:12 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you please check this way? It only has strange tags which shouldn't be in OSM:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569351780Cheers, Jan |
| 57188920 by jpmartin1977 | 1 | 2018-03-15 10:38:29 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you uploaded almost 3000 ways with only foreign tags on top of already existing roads. I guess this was a mistake? CENTERLINE=13864 FULLNAME=S F M 866 ROADCLASS=PrncplArt-Freeway Shape_STLe=9829.75042199 last_edi_1=2017-04-28 last_edite=ELANDRUMJan |
| 57101822 by jasrra | 1 | 2018-03-13 11:36:16 UTC | mueschel | Please watch out for the correct spelling of all tags, for example:roof material -> roof:materialwall -> wall:materialstorey -> building:levels |
| 57115718 by osmmichl | 1 | 2018-03-13 11:28:53 UTC | mueschel | Hi,du hast hier ein paar neue Tags erfunden, type_of_initiative, SSEDAS_PARTNER, identityKannst du erklären, was sie bedeuten?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-13 23:48:14 UTC | geow | SSEDAS_PARTNER ist mir auch schleierhaft, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57114993 Für den der Rest: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/TransforMapGrußKlaus | |
| 3 | 2018-03-15 22:12:39 UTC | osmmichl | Hallo mueschel, hallo Klaus!Ich versuche anhand von zwei Pilot-POI's (die beiden, die Dir, Klaus, aufgefallen sind) Einträge zu erzeugen, die auch in transformap.org erscheinen (siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_TransforMap).Leider musste ich feststellen, dass die D... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-15 22:23:36 UTC | osmmichl | Sorry, Nachtrag:Es muss 'transformap.co' (statt '*.org')Michl | |
| 5 | 2018-03-17 22:52:53 UTC | geow | Hi Michl, key=SSEDAS_PARTNER kannst du bitte löschen, den gibt es nur ein einziges Mal in unserer Datenbank und wurde von dir angelegt: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=SSEDAS_PARTNERDie anderen im wiki dokumentierten keys wie z.B. identity, provides etc. kommen einige hundertma... | |
| 57114635 by bigleo7 | 1 | 2018-03-13 10:37:08 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you introduced two new tags here - 1st teaching=trueshow_label=trueCould you please explain their meaning?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-18 15:01:03 UTC | VlIvYur | Also you have set it on all nodes of the building | |
| 57071996 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2018-03-12 12:04:34 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you please check the rivers? It looks like they overlap with previously mapped rivers. And I guess these tags shouldn't have been uploaded:AGENCY = FWS MANAGING_E = FWS RIVERCATEG = Federally Administered RIVER_ID = 40 SHAPE_LEN = 5.50073159877 STATE = Alaska WEBLINK =... |
| 2 | 2018-03-12 14:23:42 UTC | AlaskaDave | Thank you for the note. I forgot to clean up the original tags and left some extra tags on one section. I removed those. But I don't see any "overlap" with previously mapped rivers. Can you explain more fully what you mean? | |
| 3 | 2018-03-12 14:37:24 UTC | mueschel | Looking more closely, it's just a glitch of the rendering server - when I checked both the new and the old (coarse) river way were shown simultaneously. The database is clean though. | |
| 57079003 by Arman Sakif | 1 | 2018-03-12 09:27:09 UTC | mueschel | Hi Arman,could you explain the meaning of the key "field paper = H1"? This looks like it shouldn't be there.And: do these buildings really have a number as name? This would imply that local people will know which building you're talking about like in "I'm going to house 05".\... |
| 2 | 2018-03-13 15:29:10 UTC | Arman Sakif | Hi Mueschel,The field paper number and the house number are temporary for our project work. I will update the full database of every house. I put the temporary house number because it will help me to find the house later. I will update this in few days. thanks for your comment. | |
| 56994058 by utvonalfelmeresek | 1 | 2018-03-11 11:57:24 UTC | mueschel | Hi,the dog tags on this restaurant are new, and not used before. What do you think about the following tagging, which follows the established 'access' and 'conditional access' keys:dog = yesdog:conditional = no @ (12:00-15:00);no @ (weight > 10)Cheers, Jan |
| 57004915 by NixillUmbreon | 1 | 2018-03-11 11:53:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added several bus stops with the tag "downtown = yes". This is new and used in any other place. Could you describe its meaning?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-11 18:39:42 UTC | NixillUmbreon | Thanks for the catch! To be honest, those keys should never have been on those nodes in the first place. I've taken the erroneous tags off the relation members in my newest changeset (#57090144).In the future, I may re-tag `ddot:downtown`=`yes` on stops to which their "Inbound CBD" fif... | |
| 57041493 by Hasbro2 | 1 | 2018-03-11 11:45:34 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,kannst du bitte hier und auf den angrenzenden Wegen das Tempolimit checken? Dort sind jetzt 2 Angaben:maxspeed:backward =70maxspeed:forward_1 =100Gruß, Jan |
| 57055544 by bbroy13 | 1 | 2018-03-11 11:29:05 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check your tagging presets?The key "place:neighbourhood" should be "addr:neighbourhood" and "place:suburb" should be "addr:suburb".Would you mind changing this?Btw, it looks a lot like an import, what is the source of your data?Cheer... |
| 57050092 by Ernan joshua | 1 | 2018-03-10 15:44:05 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!On this POI you added the tagsroof:material =concreteroof:material_1 =tilesroof:material_2 =steelUsing the same tag several times with an '_1' and '_2' should be avoided. You can add all the options to one tag:roof:material = concrete;tiles;steelCheers, Jan |
| 57005126 by ITineris | 1 | 2018-03-10 13:42:52 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added some tags like "maxspeed:forward:bus" here - the normal order is "maxspeed:bus:forward" or more general:key[:subkey][:hgv|:bicycle|...][:lanes][:forward|:backward|:both_ways][:conditional]=*Cheers, Jan |
| 57036726 by sorieson j kamara | 1 | 2018-03-10 13:39:47 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!Please don't upload such private data to the OSM database. This information seems to be for your local organization but is of no use for other users.See here for more comments: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56576898Jan |
| 57029372 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-03-09 12:04:36 UTC | Hjart | The burnt key probably should be documented on the wiki if before using it again |
| 2 | 2018-03-09 12:28:56 UTC | mueschel | Yes, definitely. I just changed it because 'burnt' is already used 300 times, and the prefix 'burnt:' was not in use at all. Jan | |
| 56938844 by Inssaf EL FEKHAR | 1 | 2018-03-06 15:37:23 UTC | frosm | Bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap.en quoi consiste le test ?car votre essais a été publiée sur la base réelle, disponible pour tous et non sur une base de test.il aurait aussi été souhaitable de faire un test de taille plus réduite :)par ... |
| 2 | 2018-03-07 08:54:19 UTC | Inssaf EL FEKHAR | Bonjour,Oui effectivement ceci était uniquement un test pour voir comment si je pourrai intégrer les données depuis un ordinateur qui n'est pas les miens (questions de sécurité). Désolée pour la taille.Du coup je voudrais bien supprimer cette modi... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-09 10:23:41 UTC | mueschel | This "test" also introduced many strange tags like these - will this be cleaned up? addr_hou_1 = CAUE 95 full_id = w43705687 heritage_o = mhs mhs_inscri = 1979-12-27 osm_id = 43705687 osm_type = way ref_mhs = PA00080172 | |
| 4 | 2018-03-09 11:34:18 UTC | mueschel | Additionally: Several of the buildings I checked are on top of other, already existing objects. I think this changeset should be reverted. | |
| 5 | 2018-03-19 12:21:01 UTC | frosm | Bonjour,j'ai vu que vous aviez entre temps fait un revert.avez-vous besoin d'aide pour commencer ?au besoin, en utilisant l'éditeur interne iD, il y a un tutoriel.Pour les données, si celle-ci viennent du cadastre, il y a aussi un (petit) tutoriel sur le wiki (au besoin je v&ea... | |
| 56948627 by opengislab | 1 | 2018-03-09 11:31:51 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added some new keys here that are not used in other places, i.e.clase=2cod_pob=66001056editor=opengislabWere these added on purposes or by mistake? Did you check if there is a more suitable, established key for this information?Cheers, Jan |
| 56934896 by diputat007 | 1 | 2018-03-09 10:31:46 UTC | mueschel | Hi,these two lines have no typical tags, just some imported ones which do not belong to OSM. Could you clarify the meaning of these and tag them accordingly?Jan |
| 56886608 by myopenstreetumap | 1 | 2018-03-09 10:08:27 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this POI?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121386732It has a opening_hours and a opening_hour tag, and they do not agree with each other.Cheers, Jan |
| 57005075 by concern_ww | 1 | 2018-03-09 09:51:59 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!I found that you have used many non-standard tags in your edits. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to describe objects so that the information can be used in any software. These tags you used are not defined:Capacity:seats=500Classrooms_number=13Disabilit... |
| 56819161 by krugerr | 1 | 2018-03-06 11:58:47 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I don't understand the tagging of this shop. E.g. it has the tag "service:bicycle:Snowboard" - what does that mean? They service snowboards mounted to bicycles?Jan |
| 56905225 by BernardJustusMuhwezi | 1 | 2018-03-06 11:53:49 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you please check the tags on the 280 schools you have added? There are several mistakes:emanity=School -> this is misspelled, should be "amenity = school".elevation=nulloperator=nullThese look like a mistake and shouldn't appear as tagspreset=Facilitiestype... |
| 56905867 by Farma Jacob | 1 | 2018-03-06 11:51:05 UTC | mueschel | Hi,have you read the comments on this changeset? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56576898Please don't add your private mapping information to the OSM database! |
| 56878869 by Hernan | 1 | 2018-03-05 11:51:29 UTC | mueschel | Hi,there are 16 glaciers with the tag "glaciar:type" - would you mind fixing the spelling mistake? glaciar -> glacierCheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-05 12:20:43 UTC | Hernan | Hi, of course. My native language is Spanish and I did not notice the typing mistake. Today without fail I'll correct it. Regards and thanks for the noticeHernan | |
| 56841517 by brianh | 1 | 2018-03-05 11:38:37 UTC | mueschel | Hi,these relations have a tag "group_1" which doesn't look right - did you forget to change it to another key?Cheers, Jan |
| 56809070 by haoyiping | 1 | 2018-03-04 16:50:29 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please don't upload test data to the main OSM database. There is a dedicated development server available, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_the_dev_server |
| 56711719 by Thu Min | 1 | 2018-03-03 13:49:22 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please watch out for the correct spelling of keys! I found keys like "name my", "name: my", "namemy", "name;my" which are all wrong. The only allowed spelling is "name:my". Cheers, Jan |
| 56390940 by gregcrago | 1 | 2018-03-02 19:27:40 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found 25 ways with the tag "orv" - this is new and not used anywhere else. What does it mean?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-03-04 22:43:04 UTC | gregcrago | In Michigan, there is a Department of Natural Resource (DNR) that designate Morotcycle Trails (highway=path & motorcycle=yes), Off-Road Vehicles (ORV Trails)(atv=designated, highway=track, maxwidth=4'2") and ORV Routes (orv=yes) or 'Jeep Routes' | |
| 56576898 by Farma Jacob | 1 | 2018-02-22 17:21:59 UTC | pitscheplatsch | Hi Farma Jacob, welcome to OSM.Could you please describe your map edits? This changeset contains some strange map elements and tags. Thanks.See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56576898 |
| 2 | 2018-02-23 10:56:34 UTC | Harald Hartmann | It looks like data for local (and offline) usage without any benefit for the public osm database.I think it should be reverted immediately. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-02 19:25:46 UTC | mueschel | As there was no answer, I removed those ways now. I didn't do a revert but removed them by hand because of conflicts. | |
| 56779790 by phiona2018Munezero | 1 | 2018-03-02 19:11:12 UTC | mueschel | Hi,all data in OSM is case sensitive - please do not use capital letters for names (like addr:country=KILAK ) or values like "FUNCTIONAL"Thank you,Jan |
| 56823498 by hvalentim | 1 | 2018-03-02 19:03:08 UTC | mueschel | Hi,there are still some tags left: Many objects with a "cml:GlobalId" and a very long description which better fits in wikipedia but not in OSM.Will you have a look for that? |
| 2 | 2018-03-02 19:14:29 UTC | hvalentim | "cml:GlobalId" is needed should the info be updated in the future (it allows the cross matching with entries from the open geodata platform of Lisbon municipality).Concerning the descriptions, I agree. They need to be better abridged, most are truncated. But that should be easy. The hard... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-02 19:19:54 UTC | hvalentim | Perhaps I could use an established field instead? Something like:source:pkey=xxxxsource=osmsync:yyyy | |
| 56614708 by zwaygp | 1 | 2018-03-01 07:31:33 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the house number tag here?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563664795Cheers, Jan |
| 56767170 by Romashka1111 | 1 | 2018-03-01 07:24:44 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like something went wrong here - you uploaded a large amount of rectangles that don't seem to belong into the OSM database.Could you check that?Cheers, Jan |
| 56608764 by Carsten Madsen | 1 | 2018-02-27 13:30:30 UTC | mueschel | Could you check this and the adjacent way? They have many foreign tags.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563630701Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-27 15:23:40 UTC | Carsten Madsen | Fixed | |
| 56697881 by таня скидан | 1 | 2018-02-27 13:22:29 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found 130 ways with the tag 'fire_operato' which should be 'fire_operator' - would uou mind fixing these spelling mistakes?Cheers, Jan |
| 56666338 by Thu Min | 1 | 2018-02-26 08:38:49 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the tagging of these roads? I found 120 Keys like "name: en" and "name: my" - but there should be no space after the ':'. "name:en" would be correct.Cheers, Jan |
| 56656968 by tteo98 | 1 | 2018-02-25 11:51:24 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I saw that you added tags like "route_ref_7" in order to note the routes that use a bus stop. These tags are new and not used in other places. The common way is to make a list of routes, separated by ';' like:route_ref = 1;23;24;34;56;78;245;...Would you mind changing your tag... |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 12:59:44 UTC | tteo98 | Hi,I had just realised that I was wrong, but thank you for the confirm.I'm going to correct all the bus stops.Cheers, Matteo | |
| 56546278 by Nikkanen | 1 | 2018-02-22 09:19:16 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found this node and four others. Could you please change the tags to common English ones? It seems that the recycling-tags very well describes the POI, but they can't be understood by any of our software. Here you can find a list of known tags (also available in Finnish)https://wiki.opens... |
| 56294771 by Rubén Corral García | 1 | 2018-02-15 10:54:56 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you're adding some strange tags to objects:Alumno=Rubén Corral GarcíaMasterDesastres=yesDid you add them on purpose?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-15 13:51:44 UTC | Rubén Corral García | Hi Jan,Yes, I did it on purpose. Its a university project and I need to add this tags. My teacher will delete the tags in a few weeks.Ruben. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-15 14:02:48 UTC | mueschel | Well, this is bad advice by your teacher. The OSM database is not meant for such "private" information. Introducing new tags usually follows a defined process and discussion in the community. Please remember that this data now has been copied to thousands of databases world-wide and will e... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-15 14:05:59 UTC | Rubén Corral García | Okay, it will be delete soon. | |
| 5 | 2018-02-21 10:49:24 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you ask your supervisor to contact me to clarify how to proceed with this?In the meantime we have at least 20 different spellings of the "special tags" of your group in the database, which just doesn't help at all. | |
| 6 | 2018-03-06 14:00:27 UTC | shiguera | Hi, @mueschel.I send you a message to clarify RegardsSantiago @shiguera | |
| 40484498 by Mohit Vashistha | 1 | 2016-07-12 20:19:46 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this commit created almost 10,000 new nodes which are not part of any way and have no tags. I guess it was an error? Can they be deleted?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-18 16:58:12 UTC | alzyee | I think that they should be deleted/ this edit reverted (if the node has not been changed since) because they appear useless / part of an import and the user has not made any other edits or comments as far as I can see. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-18 18:03:57 UTC | mueschel | Yes, you're right. I've deleted the nodes now:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56469851 | |
| 56427425 by Rps333 | 1 | 2018-02-18 12:48:09 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found 23 POIs with rather strange tags, like this node:http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5417428673There are several keys that don't look like they should appear in OSM: City=High Level Province=Alberta Site_Name=High Level site_type=Scheduled OutreachCould you c... |
| 2 | 2018-02-18 15:06:40 UTC | Rps333 | thanks. I will fix them | |
| 56318272 by LarsBG | 1 | 2018-02-18 12:41:56 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain this edit? According to images these roads exist.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-18 14:33:22 UTC | freebeer | I believe this scandinavian armchair mapper meant to write ``never'' instead of ``newer'', which is the false impression one could get from Bing z20 default, or ESRI here.The DG Premium source listed is new enough both in the z19 satellite and the z20-up Mapbox aerial to show the roads completed a... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-18 18:40:51 UTC | LarsBG | Thank you for all the love/hate. If you are not satisfied with my edit just undu my upload. And I hope you all have a wonderful day. | |
| 4 | 2018-02-19 17:56:27 UTC | freebeer | I can't speak for mueschel, but I do not work that way -- first I want to understand how and why a mapper did something (thus my guessing speculation above), and I will only revert something like this at the request of and with agreement of the mapper, which I am happy to do but only if *you* are no... | |
| 5 | 2018-02-19 21:06:29 UTC | LarsBG | armchair mapper > YesForm my screen I cant see anything wrong.But you have my permission to revert as it is a armchair mapping. So if there is someone that thinks it is better for osm without the added streets. Be my guests to revert it. As i don't want any war. | |
| 6 | 2018-02-19 21:49:21 UTC | LarsBG | LOL I am sorry for all this. I was so sure that I already had revet it myself - so I did not check - sorry for be so thick headed :-)I hope all is ok now ? | |
| 7 | 2018-02-19 22:54:28 UTC | freebeer | Hi,Thanks for seeing your error.Is it okay if I perform a revert of both changeset 56504431 ... Ways (4) Travis Summit (560963299, v2) Primrose Post (560963298, v2) Bluebonnet Bay (560963297, v2) Monets Garden (560963296, v2)And this changeset, seen below, where you del... | |
| 8 | 2018-02-19 23:17:56 UTC | LarsBG | Yes. Pls do. I dont know how to do a revert properly :-) | |
| 9 | 2018-02-20 01:25:22 UTC | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56507461 where the changeset comment is: Phase 2, user-requested proper revert of mistaken deletion/mistagging new construction | |
| 36567978 by MENTZ_TU | 1 | 2018-02-18 11:58:34 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,an insgesamt 65 Relationen gibt es das Tag "destiantion:symbol" mit Tippfehler (destiantion -> destination)Z.B. hier:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5861536Korrigiert das jemand ihrer Firma?Die verwendeten Werte der Keys entsprechen leider auch nicht den im Wiki... |
| 56378054 by Georgiysys | 1 | 2018-02-17 11:28:59 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the tagging of these beautiful 3D-buildings?There are 1332 objects with the tag "building_colour". This should be "building:colour"Additionally, all the nodes are tagged e.g. as building, but these tags seem to belong to the ways only. |
| 2 | 2018-02-17 11:50:09 UTC | Georgiysys | I indicated the color to make out the appearance, is there any problem with using this tag? | |
| 3 | 2018-02-17 11:54:19 UTC | Georgiysys | Or do you mean that there were points, if the points I deleted them, remained from the rough work, I did not see them in josm | |
| 4 | 2018-02-17 11:58:27 UTC | mueschel | Tagging the colour is fine. But spelling of the tag is wrong. Note the difference: "building_colour" and "building:colour" - '_' versus ':'.The nodes I refer to are part of ways - that's correct. But they should not have tags themselves. For example this one:https://www.op... | |
| 5 | 2018-02-17 12:24:44 UTC | Georgiysys | building_color in my zhosm for some reason did not work or the changes are not visible, I now recheck, I need help and a lot :) I wanted to make the whole city in 3D, | |
| 6 | 2018-02-17 12:32:58 UTC | Georgiysys | now on tried to change to building_color the color stopped showing up | |
| 7 | 2018-02-17 12:34:05 UTC | Georgiysys | you have a completely decorated 3D object, I'll take examples from it? | |
| 8 | 2018-02-17 12:49:02 UTC | Georgiysys | and all found a mistake, thank you | |
| 56376380 by matNJ | 1 | 2018-02-17 11:30:07 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you added 600 buildings with the tag "circle=yes". This tag is not used in any other place and not documented. Could you explain its meaning?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-17 19:46:53 UTC | matNJ | My mistake, sorry! I have removed the tags. | |
| 56289700 by enmet | 1 | 2018-02-16 13:19:55 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,du hast hier einige neue Tags verwendet (TSO, DSO, Spannungsebene), die es sonst nirgends gibt. Kannst du das eventuell in gebräuchliche Tags ändern?Gruß, Jan |
| 56309658 by noeeelll | 1 | 2018-02-15 10:55:06 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you're adding some strange tags to objects:Alumno=noeeelllMasterDesastres=yesDid you add them on purpose?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-15 14:47:24 UTC | noeeelll | Hi Jan,I did put those tags con purpose. Our proffesor asked us to. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-15 16:28:05 UTC | mueschel | Hi,Ruben wrote the same answer, please see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56294771 for my comments.Thanks! | |
| 56295543 by Alejandra Gallego | 1 | 2018-02-15 10:56:35 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you're adding some strange tags to objects:Alumno=Alejandra GallegoMasterDesastres=yesDid you add them on purpose?Jan |
| 56351434 by dianasta | 1 | 2018-02-15 10:56:20 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you're adding some strange tags to objects:Alumno=dianastaMasterDesastres=yesDid you add them on purpose?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-16 12:27:35 UTC | dianasta | Yes, it ok | |
| 56295554 by RaquAkkas | 1 | 2018-02-15 10:55:23 UTC | mueschel | Hi, you're adding some strange tags to objects: Alumno=RaquAkkas MasterDesastres=yes Did you add them on purpose? Jan |
| 56248474 by nkbre | 1 | 2018-02-12 13:40:37 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,hier ist wohl etwas schiefgegangen, dieser Weg hat nur Tags die nicht in OSM gehören:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560379388Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-12 13:56:38 UTC | nkbre | Hallo Jan,vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Nachdem ich die Geometrie vom LfD eingefügt hatte, war ich nicht damit einverstanden - der Wasserturm scheint nicht berücksichtigt zu sein. Ich möchte das noch mit dem Landesamt diskutieren. Einen entsprechenden Hinweis kann ich an den Weg... | |
| 56221461 by Marco Teixeira Globaleda | 1 | 2018-02-12 12:44:36 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check these five relations like this one?http://osm.org/relation/8005045They all contain several imported tags that do not seem to belong to OSM and have no other common tags.Thanks, Jan |
| 56190507 by StenSoft | 1 | 2018-02-12 11:44:34 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found two ways with the tag "maxspeed:total" which doesn't make much sense - could you check and fix these?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-12 12:05:26 UTC | StenSoft | Sure, it should be maxweight:total. Fixed. | |
| 56159117 by FrancyskoMarkes | 1 | 2018-02-09 09:36:19 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this changeset contains many ways which do not have any actual OSM-related tag and seem to be imported from some external source.E.g. this http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/559523299Could you explain the meaning and state what the source is?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-09 21:00:20 UTC | naoliv | Francysko, talvez você estava usando a camada de faces para nomear as ruas e enviou sem querer esses objetos? | |
| 3 | 2018-02-10 18:04:36 UTC | FrancyskoMarkes | Bom, eu utilizei esta camada de faces que foi disponiblizada no grupo do OSM Brasil. Pois esta cidade Chaval, não contém a camada de setores urbanos do IBGE. Mas caso esteja incorreta ou não de acordo, peço que me corrijam e desfaçam essa edição. | |
| 4 | 2018-02-10 18:06:54 UTC | FrancyskoMarkes | Poxa me desculpem. A camada faces foi junto. | |
| 5 | 2018-02-11 14:02:50 UTC | mueschel | Alright, I removed those lines in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56264248Jan | |
| 6 | 2018-02-12 12:58:22 UTC | FrancyskoMarkes | Obrigado por corrigir esse erro. Prestarei mais atenção na próxima edição. | |
| 56198745 by Rúdisicyon | 1 | 2018-02-10 11:19:54 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like something went wrong here - all the buildings have a tag like "snippet=Edifício( Anexo )" Could you check and fix this?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-10 17:57:32 UTC | Rúdisicyon | Hi mueschel,Thanks for the heads up! It should be fixed now.Cheers! | |
| 56120610 by isnogoud | 1 | 2018-02-09 16:55:17 UTC | mueschel | Could you check this way? It has some strange number as tag.Cheers, Jan |
| 56170179 by Sarjan Shahi | 1 | 2018-02-09 12:13:43 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM. It looks like something is wrong with the software you use (maybe a JOSM plugin?)It adds tags like these to the objects:"Select amenity type \tRestaurant""Select option that best describes feature category \tAmenity"This seems to be a bug in the softw... |
| 56190899 by Dipesh55 | 1 | 2018-02-09 12:13:19 UTC | mueschel | Hi,It looks like something is wrong with the software you use (maybe a JOSM plugin?)It adds tags like these to the objects:"Select amenity type \tRestaurant""Select option that best describes feature category \tAmenity"This seems to be a bug in the software.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-09 14:04:05 UTC | Dipesh55 | I will look After It | |
| 56118316 by khanalbhupesh | 1 | 2018-02-09 12:12:37 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM. It looks like something is wrong with the software you use (maybe a JOSM plugin?)It adds tags like these to the objects:"Select amenity type \tRestaurant""Select option that best describes feature category \tAmenity"This seems to be a bug in the softw... |
| 56110663 by Madan Kandu | 1 | 2018-02-09 12:12:11 UTC | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM. It looks like something is wrong with the software you use (maybe a JOSM plugin?)It adds tags like these to the objects:"Select amenity type \tRestaurant""Select option that best describes feature category \tAmenity"This seems to be a bug in the softw... |
| 56080596 by GidonW | 1 | 2018-02-09 12:06:29 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain why you added these tags? A node defining the geometry of a way is just normal and doesn't need an additional tag.Comparing with aerial images, the nodes are very well placed according to the actual geometry.Jan |
| 56157775 by wiuhighwayman | 1 | 2018-02-09 09:38:26 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this import seems to have gone wrong. 3600 buildings have many foreign tags which shouldn't appear in the OSM database like these:Corp=BardolphLandUse_Ty=ResidentialOBJECTID=13974Shape_Area=2750.87390396Shape_Leng=283.434877206Tall=NoTownship=Macomb TownshipCould you fix this?... |
| 2 | 2018-02-09 16:19:27 UTC | wiuhighwayman | Hi Jan,I figured out the issue -- I imported a shapefile in JOSM and didn't clean out the fields, which came in as these extraneous tags. I have fixed this issue (deleted and recreated) and will update the other uploads that have the same problem. Thanks for catching the issue.Chris | |
| 3 | 2018-02-26 02:51:14 UTC | chachafish | Greetings. I'm no expert on imports and please correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you required to create a dedicated user account for an import? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines | |
| 4 | 2018-02-26 03:33:47 UTC | wiuhighwayman_import | Yes, thank you chachafish. Meant to do that and then spaced it until your comment arrived. Using the dedicated account now. | |
| 5 | 2018-02-26 03:50:07 UTC | chachafish | Cheers! :) | |
| 56030937 by erkinalp | 1 | 2018-02-06 12:08:10 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of the tag "directionality" on this way? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/558267269It isn't used in any other place yet.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-07 16:16:11 UTC | erkinalp | It means the buses can enter backwards only. It is used as terminus of ESHOT route 885. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-07 18:56:55 UTC | mueschel | Ah ok,that would be "oneway=-1".But I can't find such an additional lane in any satellite image - I can see just the regular intersection that is mapped with the straight ways. | |
| 56026875 by tux67 | 1 | 2018-02-06 12:02:48 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,das Tag "motor_vehicle:conditional:bus" gibt es so bisher nicht. Kannst du beschreiben, wer da wie fahren darf? Die Zufahrt zu den Häusern dort ist doch sicherlich erlaubt? |
| 2 | 2018-02-06 13:18:56 UTC | tux67 | Hi mueschel,Wahrscheinlich hätte ich eine Aspirin zur Lektüre der conditional restictions im Wiki nehmen sollen ;-) Hab's jetzt nochmal korregiert. Die Lage vor Ort kannst du dir mit dem Link auch selbst ansehen.Danke für den Hinweis (schau mal bitte ob's jetzt passt).Gru&s... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-06 14:04:58 UTC | mueschel | Hallo Stephan,das Tagging passt zum Schild :-)Um es wirklich korrekt hinzubekommen müsste noch jemand am anderen Ende schauen, ob die Beschilderung dort die gleiche ist.Jan | |
| 56047989 by GTTGsba | 1 | 2018-02-06 12:16:50 UTC | mueschel | Hi,You added the tag "soure_ref \thttps://goo.gl/maps/8eryM2y1Apk" here. Please note that it's not allowed to copy any information from Google - there license is not compatible with ODbL!Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-07 13:41:15 UTC | GTTGsba | Thanks! Now updated to share the Photos directly not from Google Maps | |
| 56025778 by leveskockaa | 1 | 2018-02-06 12:04:09 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this way has two maxspeed:forward tags - could you check which one is correct?Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-07 21:05:14 UTC | leveskockaa | Hi,Was it this one?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517758746If yes, I believe 40 is correct, but I will check the area when construction is finished.Thanks for notifying me!Levi | |
| 56110548 by CAI Salò | 1 | 2018-02-06 10:42:20 UTC | mueschel | Hi,please watch out for the correct spelling: It's "osmc:symbol", not "oscm:symbol". I fixed several of these typos right now, I hope I didn't miss any.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-06 11:28:33 UTC | CAI Salò | thank's | |
| 55573156 by Asheesh Sharma | 1 | 2018-01-21 13:21:16 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this way has a strange tag - did you mean "barrier = fence"?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554219952Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-05 23:18:46 UTC | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55573156 | |
| 3 | 2018-02-06 00:24:18 UTC | mueschel | @PlaneMad: Did you actually check this changeset? Most of the objects have tags like road=road, building=Gargares, Fench=fench.That's not what I would call 'great'. | |
| 4 | 2018-02-06 02:04:30 UTC | PlaneMad | Hello! My previous review of your changeset was wrong, so I'm changing its status to unreviewed on OSMCHA. Sorry for the error. Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55573156 | |
| 5 | 2018-02-06 02:05:50 UTC | PlaneMad | You are right, I checked some of the smaller buildings and from the shapes it looked good, but the tags are messed up. | |
| 55992413 by commune de Fes | 1 | 2018-02-05 11:41:22 UTC | mueschel | Hi,the tag "payment:0535601836 = yes" on this pharmacy looks strange. Is the number a telephone number?Jan |
| 56025653 by fabiomabiscoito | 1 | 2018-02-05 09:45:37 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found the tag "route-ref=X04 X08 X09 X10" on 30 nodes. Could you fix two issues?- It's route_ref, not route-ref- the list of routes should be separated by ;For example:route_ref=X04; X08; X09; X10Cheers, Jan |
| 56066407 by isnogoud | 1 | 2018-02-05 09:43:58 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I found the key "ref:FANTOIR" on 68 objects - the usual key is "ref:FR:FANTOIR". Would you mind having a look and fix these?Cheers, Jan |
| 55844200 by Valentino_C | 1 | 2018-02-03 11:59:03 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this node? This cliff is placed in the middle of the sea.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5369134426Thanks, Jan |
| 55883007 by Kamal Khadka | 1 | 2018-02-02 12:07:51 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the type of this mill?The name says "rice", the tag says 'sawmill' (cutting wood).https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556935042Cheers, Jan |
| 55843664 by Wulfmorn | 1 | 2018-01-31 11:34:50 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the name tag on this lake?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556586965Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-05 15:36:14 UTC | Wulfmorn | Oops, thanks. I have fixed it. | |
| 55840061 by luiswoo | 1 | 2018-01-30 11:52:33 UTC | mueschel | Hi,just a hint: you used the tag "bus = 10" to mark bus numbers. The usual tag for this is "route_ref".And a question: what is the meaning of "shuttle_bus"? This key is new and hasn't been used in any other place.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-30 12:30:39 UTC | luiswoo | В "route_ref" можно истолковывать множественные значения, как "route_ref=12b;15;95"?shuttle_bus=share_taxi — забыл исправить ошибку.Не знаю, нужно ли остановке публичного т... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-30 12:55:39 UTC | mueschel | Yes, route_ref can have multiple values.I'm sorry, but I can't give a response to the rest - I don't speak Russian and google translate is not good enough for me to understand. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-30 12:58:21 UTC | luiswoo | У меня аналогичная проблема. | |
| 5 | 2018-01-30 14:02:29 UTC | freeExec | Зачем вообще эти bus=* shuttle_bus=* всё логично получается из отношений маршрута. | |
| 6 | 2018-01-30 14:08:23 UTC | mueschel | freeExec, a route is always the best solution. But as long as the route is not mapped, route_ref is a perfect source of information. It is used 170,000 times worldwide. | |
| 7 | 2018-01-30 14:22:19 UTC | Zverik | luiswoo, ты не мог бы bus=*, share_taxi=*, shuttle_bus=* заменить на route_ref:bus=*, route_ref:share_taxi=* и т.п.? По вики, именно этот ключ используется для перечисления номеров маршрутов через остано... | |
| 8 | 2018-01-30 14:23:31 UTC | luiswoo | name=пл. К. Марксаbus=80,70,64share_taxi=98,80,66,24trolleybus=22,2Это реальная остановка.Разве что изобретать route_ref:bus, route_ref:share_taxi, route_ref=trolleybus…Сложно в общем. И отношений тут тоже... | |
| 9 | 2018-01-30 14:25:23 UTC | luiswoo | Слишком медленно пишу… | |
| 10 | 2018-01-30 14:30:23 UTC | Zverik | Я думаю, лучше с префиксом "route_ref:", потому что теги bus, trolleybus и прочие уже имеют значение — останавливаются ли тут маршруты указанных видов. | |
| 11 | 2018-01-30 14:31:19 UTC | freeExec | Откуда вообще пошло это>bus=80,70,64bus=* используется в схеме access | |
| 12 | 2018-01-30 14:35:22 UTC | luiswoo | отсюда http://rostov-gorod.ru/opendata/ | |
| 13 | 2018-01-30 14:37:49 UTC | freeExec | Да, нет, я про использование тега, а не данных.Используется неподходящий тег. | |
| 14 | 2018-01-30 14:38:47 UTC | luiswoo | я просто ничего не менял | |
| 15 | 2018-01-30 14:39:15 UTC | luiswoo | кроме name | |
| 55834035 by klain890 | 1 | 2018-01-30 12:59:50 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "name:village" on 121 nodes. I guess this is a mistake and should be 'addr:village'. Could you have a look and check this?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-30 13:51:18 UTC | klain890 | Thank you, let me adjust that. | |
| 55574424 by manh nguyen duy | 1 | 2018-01-30 09:28:43 UTC | mueschel | Welcome to OSM,please don't use the OSM database for testing - this data is used by many people world-wide and is not the right place to make any experiments. Please use the development database for this:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editingJan |
| 55850888 by AndrewSP37 | 1 | 2018-01-30 09:24:33 UTC | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong here. 2053 buildings got tags that don't look like they should appear in OSM:fcode=Building Generalfeaturecod=790lasteditor=CONVERSIONlastupdate=20140305shape_star=3348.73510742000shape_stle=275.42919704700subtypefie=11231Could you check and fix that?J... |
| 55419993 by ah511 | 1 | 2018-01-15 09:43:41 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like something went wrong here, there are 16 nodes with these tags:----addr:housenumber=DELETE----description=DELETE----null=DELETE----opening_hours=DELETE----phone=DELETE----website=DELETECould you have a look?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-17 15:33:20 UTC | highflyer74 | @ah511: apart from the wrong tagging our fellow mapper addressed above, why did you even add the data if it is only guessed information? If you are not sure about it, it should rather not be added. The reason is: many people are relying on the information we add here. Especially when it comes to med... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-29 07:04:17 UTC | ah511 | Sorry these are definitely not accurate since my phones gps accuracy is no more accurate than 10meters. And also, the bing maps inaccuracy shifts more than 30 meters. As for tags, I will try to fix it once i get a good enough internet connection. I will also upload gpx from now so someone can fix wh... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-29 07:06:37 UTC | ah511 | about the tags, can someone delete the tags with "delete" in it | |
| 5 | 2018-01-29 07:20:07 UTC | highflyer74 | Hello!Thank you for your feedback. As long as they do exist, everything is fine. Also you should add a changeset description and source before uploading. JOSM is offering a window with two text fields you can use to do that. That helps other mappers to understand your intentions. If you have any... | |
| 6 | 2018-01-29 09:27:15 UTC | mueschel | Hi ah511,I removed those tags a few days ago. 10 m accuracy is really nothing to worry about - there is a huge amount of data that is a lot worse. | |
| 55800189 by mueschel | 1 | 2018-01-28 11:44:40 UTC | ff5722 | It seems that the nodes you deleted were the location of a road although not tagged correctly, this is still valid map data.https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55800189 |
| 2 | 2018-01-28 12:08:00 UTC | mueschel | Hi,that's also what I wrote to ntlong1974 - the information might be useful, but needs proper tagging. Most of the nodes were placed along existing roads, only few pieces contain new roads.A fair amount of them were off by several 100 meters from the actual road as far as I can tell from existin... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-28 12:09:12 UTC | ff5722 | Ok thank you, then i understand why you deleted all of them. | |
| 48757646 by PortBcn - Planol | 1 | 2017-05-19 08:46:43 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you please check this import of nodes? All of them have many foreign keys which should not appear in the OSM data base. The one common key (building=yes) should not be there, because these nodes are not the actual building, which are already in the database.Janhttp://www.openstreetm... |
| 2 | 2018-01-27 18:53:17 UTC | user_5359 | Have there been any reactions or do we have to apply for a revert? | |
| 3 | 2018-01-28 11:09:03 UTC | mueschel | No, I didn't get a reply. | |
| 55753706 by ihbutler | 1 | 2018-01-26 14:55:46 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the spelling of "diameter" - currently it's "diamater". And could you please check the units? 220 meter (which is the default unit) is a bit too big.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-27 14:57:50 UTC | ihbutler | Hi Jan,Thanks for your comment, I appreciate you taking the time to do it.I caught the "diamater" missspelling, thanks. I use Go Map!! on my phone in the field, and for some reason, I can't get the app to define the key for me, so I resort to typing. And then propagating the error... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-27 15:20:11 UTC | mueschel | Hi Ian,no, I've never used Go Map!!About the units, you're right. I missed that the wiki states mm as default - and the "global default" is usually meter.Btw. I also missed "diameter_crown" in the wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree170,000 us... | |
| 55759008 by ntlong1974 | 1 | 2018-01-27 10:47:24 UTC | mueschel | I reverted this changeset. Reason: All these nodes have just an image file name but no additional information. |
| 55758540 by ntlong1974 | 1 | 2018-01-27 10:46:53 UTC | mueschel | I reverted this changeset. Reason: There are 10,001 nodes without any tag. |
| 55602134 by Remígio Chilaule | 1 | 2018-01-21 11:05:29 UTC | mueschel | Hi,here's a hint for you: To tag the bus lines that stop at a given bus stop, you can use the tag "route_ref" instead of "description".Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-21 11:27:45 UTC | Remígio Chilaule | Thanks Jan! Very useful! Wish I had known before, we opted for using a general tag (description) exactly because we thought there was no specific way to indicate which routes pass on a given stop. Your suggestion comes in handy and it will free up the description tag for other uses. Its perfect many... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-27 09:40:36 UTC | Remígio Chilaule | Hi Jan, "route_ref" does not appear to be a predefined tag... Is it used elsewhere in OSM or was your suggestion specific for our case? Or is there something I'm not seeing?Thanks, | |
| 4 | 2018-01-27 09:58:23 UTC | mueschel | There is a definition in the Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:route_refIt is used 170,000 times.You have to enter it manually, I didn't find it in a JOSM preset. | |
| 55734408 by LuSirto | 1 | 2018-01-26 14:57:04 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check the spelling of the tags? 'metrial' should be 'material'.Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-26 18:50:14 UTC | LuSirto | thanks, I fixed the mistake. unfortunately it was done because of the rush due to the emergency | |
| 55730519 by ntlong1974 | 1 | 2018-01-26 12:03:30 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like this import of data (here and in other changesets) went wrong. All the nodes have either a strange name tag or many foreign tags which should not appear in the OSM database. Please do not use OSM to store your private data like positions of images you have taken.Jan |
| 55397756 by phamtranminh | 1 | 2018-01-19 13:17:50 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of the keysCommuneLevDist_NamePROVINCEcommune?These are not common on administrative boundaries.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-26 03:38:53 UTC | phamtranminh | Thank you, Jan.We're trying to update admin boundary. These keys are in original data and we will change as it reflect admin relations.Cheers, Minh | |
| 3 | 2018-01-26 09:42:54 UTC | mueschel | Hi,such changes to tags should be done before importing the data to the OSM database. This is a database that is in use by many people and not a database for testing. Did you follow the import guidelines for this? Can you point me to a description of for example the source of the data and its lice... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-26 09:52:08 UTC | phamtranminh | Yes, it's just trial for JOSM function for copy data to OSM. We'll remove on next step when following the Guidelines. Second, Data Sharing Agrement with the city government (data ownership) is on going.Thank you! Minh | |
| 55710805 by Martha Martensen | 1 | 2018-01-24 18:53:22 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,du hast den Briefkasten jetzt mit der Straße verbunden, d.h. er würde wie ein Hindernis direkt auf der Fahrbahn stehen. Das wird z.B. bei Pollern so gemacht (da stimmt es ja auch). Wenn sich der Briefkasten am Rand der Straße befindet, dann sollte der Knoten auch genau dort ... |
| 55659683 by Spectrokid | 1 | 2018-01-24 11:39:39 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this tagging? Looks like an address or house name:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554928529Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-24 11:44:47 UTC | Spectrokid | Address is inside the building, on separate tag.Building itself is tagged as farm with a name set. I often do this when a farm is inside a residential area, otherwise I name the farmyard, not the building. What do you think is the problem? | |
| 3 | 2018-01-24 11:58:12 UTC | mueschel | Hi,the way has the tag "Vesterbjerggård = 1"This doesn't look correct - such a tag is usually caused by a mistake when doing copy-and-paste. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-24 12:03:57 UTC | Spectrokid | fixed, thx | |
| 55657574 by Marco Teixeira Globaleda | 1 | 2018-01-24 11:50:41 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of all these note* tags on this object? "note" is typically a place to leave a note to other mappers. If these are individual offices, each of them should have its own POI.Jan |
| 55668782 by jæwesome | 1 | 2018-01-24 11:46:04 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of the key "payment:#only' on this node?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5355583622It's not used on any other object.Cheers, Jan |
| 55679955 by muindre | 1 | 2018-01-24 09:58:24 UTC | mueschel | Hi,OSM is not a quiz app.Information like this is rather useless because it doesn't follow established tagging standards."Types of vehicles that you handle? = Private vehicles Heavy commercial vehicles Public service vehicles"Please read the corresponding pages in the Wiki to fin... |
| 55618408 by wegerje | 1 | 2018-01-21 11:03:31 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you used some new tags on these relations, e.g. x_bear_creek =NM 25x_ley =NM 9,10Could you explain their meaning? Maybe we can find an established tag to replace them?Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-22 19:19:30 UTC | wegerje | Thank you so much for reaching out to me. I'm an essentially a self-taught rookie and was looking to speak to a mapper I know on Thursday and tags was to be among the topics I would ask about.CDT is Continental Divide Trail. Hikers who traverse the trail often use one or both of two major paper ... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-23 19:40:09 UTC | mueschel | Hi Jeff,please don't invent tags targeted at how a special (albeit very nice) website displays stuff. If I understand right, these numbers are a reference number used in some common hiking guide?It's not really common to add references to other works, but it might be useful. Before adding th... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-28 05:09:07 UTC | wegerje | Jan,Thanks. For the moment I have simply removed the tags (X_bear_creek and x_ley). Your idea of using ref:xxx sounds like it will work for me. In the meantime I am leaving the information out and may come back to it later.Thanks again.Jeff | |
| 55638082 by naomap | 1 | 2018-01-22 13:11:29 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way? The tag "pax" looks like a mistake:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170373630Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-22 18:22:07 UTC | naomap | Indeed. This has now been fixed. Thanks for spotting it. May I ask which tool you used to detect the mistake, OSMCha ?Cheers, Antoine. | |
| 3 | 2018-01-22 18:28:07 UTC | mueschel | Hi Antoine,I'm running a small script that reads the database of Taginfo and generates a list of new keys - here's the output:http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm | |
| 55651670 by Siddo Amadou | 1 | 2018-01-22 17:16:52 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like this import went wrong. There is a huge number of foreign tags, and no common OSM tags. Did you read and follow the import guidelines?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GuidelinesE.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5354363950Jan |
| 55652672 by azizchaibou | 1 | 2018-01-22 17:15:31 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like this import went wrong. There is a huge number of foreign tags, and no common OSM tags. Did you read and follow the import guidelines?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GuidelinesE.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5354592809Jan |
| 55652281 by fatimanalher | 1 | 2018-01-22 17:14:45 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like this import went wrong. There is a huge number of foreign tags, and no common OSM tags. Did you read and follow the import guidelines?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GuidelinesE.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5354425623Jan |
| 55625335 by aloumaijimaa | 1 | 2018-01-22 13:03:23 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like this import went wrong. There is a huge number of foreign tags, and no common OSM tags. Did you read and follow the import guidelines?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GuidelinesJan |
| 55528561 by Little Brother | 1 | 2018-01-20 18:30:31 UTC | mueschel | Hi,I doubt that this way is tagged the way you wanted to tag it - could you check?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553807735Jan |
| 55522694 by Francoerbi41 | 1 | 2018-01-20 11:44:34 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you invented the new tag "reference code" on 30 objects - the common tag for this is "ref". Would you mind having a look and fixing this?Cheers, Jan |
| 55586515 by ARATAA | 1 | 2018-01-20 11:19:21 UTC | mueschel | Hi,what is the source of these roads? It can't be Bing (as stated in your changeset). The only imagery I can find all of these roads on is Google, and these we are not allowed to use as a source.Jan |
| 55462050 by Tannich | 1 | 2018-01-20 11:10:26 UTC | mueschel | Hallo,willkommen bei OSM!Du hast hier ein Tag verwendet, das so nirgends beschrieben ist: "acceptcardpayment" - dafür gibt es payment:credit_cards, payment:maestro und mehr, ich kann es nicht korrigieren, weil ich nicht weiß was genau du meinst.https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... |
| 55495450 by Kat Dacullo | 1 | 2018-01-19 13:45:32 UTC | mueschel | I reverted this changeset: Adding roads on top of each other, not using standard tagging. |
| 55496246 by Kat Dacullo | 1 | 2018-01-19 13:44:31 UTC | mueschel | I reverted this changeset: Adding roads on top of each other, not using standard tagging. |
| 55544014 by Mickaël Cloux | 1 | 2018-01-19 10:50:36 UTC | mueschel | Hi,the cash machines you added here are unfortunately not tagged correctly, tags likeatm = atmpersonnel à proximité =Oui_pendant_la journéesitué dans une agence ou un commerceand similar are not defined and can not be understood by any software.Please have a l... |
| 55523567 by ARATAA | 1 | 2018-01-17 14:51:21 UTC | highflyer74 | Hello ARATAA!Could you please make sure that the data you are adding to the OSM database only consists of tagging which is documented in the OSM Wiki.Things likeADDRESS=روستاي دولت آباد 7ARRESTER=داردCUTOUT=داردHASTERMOST=داردMVTRANSFOR=عمومیOBJEC... |
| 2 | 2018-01-17 15:00:24 UTC | ARATAA | Yes, of course, this data is the output of the GIS software | |
| 3 | 2018-01-17 15:12:06 UTC | highflyer74 | Hello and thank you for your quick reply. Data imports into OSM require to follow certain rules. Please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines for further information.We would like to make sure the data you add is of good quality so everybody can make use of it, and of cours... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-18 17:47:35 UTC | mueschel | In my opinion we should revert this import for now. The data itself is welcome, but the guidelines mentioned above have to be followed and the license situation has to be clarified. | |
| 55440754 by trial | 1 | 2018-01-18 15:46:23 UTC | mueschel | Hi,you could add a tag "maxstay" to state how long you are allowed to stay here, e.g. maxstay = 3 minThis can be understood by various tools.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-18 20:03:22 UTC | trial | I can't as there is no such limit: there is no written limit. Well, as it's bordered by a blue line, it's probably at most something like 1h30 but in practice it should be lower. 30 min? But nothing written.On [OSM-talk-fr] we were discussing about adding on the wayparking:condition:right=no_pa... | |
| 55444114 by mweper | 1 | 2018-01-18 15:41:20 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of "dashed" on this railway?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171558223This value / prefix is not used in other places.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-18 16:22:50 UTC | mweper | fixed (razed), sorry. | |
| 55414346 by hsimpson | 1 | 2018-01-18 10:43:59 UTC | mueschel | Hi,ist hier im Winter gesperrt oder bei Eis und Schnee? Access und description wiedersprechen sich.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133000434Gruß, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-18 14:55:59 UTC | hsimpson | Korrigiert, danke für den Hinweis! | |
| 55400104 by أ ش | 1 | 2018-01-17 15:50:06 UTC | mueschel | Hi,does this small residential street really have 5 different arabic names?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39662753 |
| 2 | 2018-01-17 16:20:40 UTC | أ ش | Actually these are 5 separated streets, but I did not have the time to separate them as they were created as one large street. | |
| 3 | 2018-01-17 16:24:27 UTC | أ ش | I added a note and fixme-tag. If someone has time, it would be nice if this could be fixed. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-17 17:15:13 UTC | mueschel | Splitting a way in iD is simple: You select the node where you want to split the road, then press "X". | |
| 5 | 2018-01-17 19:08:10 UTC | أ ش | Thank you for the tip, I learnt something new. :) | |
| 6 | 2018-01-17 19:14:35 UTC | أ ش | I now separated the roads, so the problem should be fixed. | |
| 7 | 2018-04-07 14:16:33 UTC | zstadler | Hi,It seems that you are the only person that mapped the "شارع رئيسي" name in Israel.I have never seen such a name in Israel, and it contradicts the Israeli street naming conventions..What is the source of the "شارع رئيسي" ("Main Street") name ... | |
| 8 | 2018-04-20 12:33:26 UTC | أ ش | Hello zstadler. Sorry for my late answer, I was on travel.The name is the locally used term by the inhabitants for this street, and is also used in bus station names surrounding this street. However, the name is not defined by official authorities.Maybe I could move this name to "loc_na... | |
| 9 | 2018-04-21 05:48:24 UTC | YfrPcI4RzVGr | It seems like this name is similar to "downtown" or "City Center" in the sense that it represents a function and importance.In OSM maps, this is captured by using highway=tertiary instead of highway=residential.I think such a name is redundant, just like name=viewpoint for a ... | |
| 55495617 by Cristine Tan | 1 | 2018-01-17 12:12:22 UTC | mueschel | Hi,all these roads already exist in OSM - now there are two overlapping roads and this causes errors for routing engines.Please note that OSM is not a place to store personal data! You have to use your own private database for these. |
| 55465633 by Kat Dacullo | 1 | 2018-01-16 16:59:05 UTC | user_5359 | Welcome to OSM! You add a lot of node with nom standard keys. Please look on node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5340976810/history, I try to correct some keys. But want is the meaning of ContactNumber? Did you mean phone? Please notice we didn't write down the local number, we use the Internati... |
| 2 | 2018-01-17 12:09:57 UTC | mueschel | There are more keys which should be changed:Address \t-> addr:street, addr:housenumber etc.EstablishmentType \t-> no ideaName -> nameOpenHours -> opening_hours, but using the syntax described in the Wiki | |
| 55493858 by ARATAA | 1 | 2018-01-17 10:54:18 UTC | mueschel | Hi,it looks like this import went completely wrong.- power=pole are tagged as power=line- each segment between two poles is an individual line- there are many tags which shouldn't appear in the database, like these:CONFIGURAT \tتکیFOUNDATION \tخاک وسنگHASEARTHSY \tندارد\... |
| 55455160 by Splasher | 1 | 2018-01-16 08:32:51 UTC | mueschel | Hi,this import contains tags which don't seem to belong to OSM, like OBJECTID and Shape_Area. Could you have a look and remove these?Jan |