Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-04-26 09:49:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging changes? E.g. 'ref:-2001-02-12' is not a valid key. There should be a double '--' when using dates according to the wiki.

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-27 08:35:01 UTCfgouget As far as I can tell the wiki says to use " key:-date = value", and that the use of '--' is outdated: "An older version of ISO 8601 used the double hyphen to replace omitted years in partial dates".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Date_nam...
12017-04-25 12:56:34 UTClenny32 The addr:* node already exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1522397032
There is no need to create another one at the restaurant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema
22017-04-25 17:51:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
I'm not aware of any tool that makes use of these tags. For most applications the tagged address was unusable. The existence of another node close by with address information is not sufficient to find the actual address of this POI.
The only case how addresses of another object can be used on...
32017-04-26 06:30:46 UTCdgitto It is the tool that have to follow (use) a schema. Not the tag schema follow some tools.
Is normal that no tools exist, when a schema starts to be used.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema
42017-04-26 08:07:33 UTCmueschel Until this schema has been adopted, we have to stick to the old scheme, otherwise we lose information. I.e. both tags have to exist in parallel.
But, I really doubt that any tool will use this tagging, based on a 4 year old draft without even an RFC.
52017-04-26 09:20:24 UTClenny32 It seems to me that an address should be unique (it exists with or without POI) it is an object in its own right. Many POIs have no address.
If it is the same node, when the POI disappears or moves, the address may be deleted or moved with the poi by the inattentive contributor. Contact information...
12017-04-25 15:09:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you have a look to 40 trees added in this changeset? They have the tag "crown_type:=I"
Note the ':' in the key which shouldn't be there. Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan
22017-04-27 08:44:19 UTCtaxi301 Hi .
This is a proposal how to improve the tagging of trees (natural=tree) for the use in 3D-applications.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Marek_kleciak/Tree_table

I was curious if it would show up in 3D, I would improve on type = palm
Sorry for my English but only by translator. Regar...
12017-04-25 15:08:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
this changeset created 9 relations with no common tags - could you check this and replace the foreign keys with common ones if necesseary?

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-24 21:36:00 UTCAthalis Hi, beim way 407255155 wolltest du wahrscheinlich wie bei den anderen Wegen das Komma durch einen Punkt austauschen? Sieht aus als ob der Punkt verloren gegangen ist ;)
22017-04-24 21:47:00 UTCmueschel Ja, der Verdacht liegt nahe ;-) Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe es korrigiert.
12017-04-24 10:47:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, it has a strange tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4806907046
80-84= 41-55

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-24 10:42:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some strange tags to objects, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488399710
"Market = Sub Post Office" and several more. What is the meaning of this?

Please have a look to the wiki to find out how common features like shops have to be tagged to be shown on the map.
...
12017-04-22 15:17:14 UTCdamjang Ok, but so the wiki must be corrected:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone :-)
22017-04-23 13:32:49 UTCmueschel You're right. Looks like somebody wants to distinguish between phone service in Italian language (:it) and an phone number to be reached from Italy only (:IT). Kind of makes sense but is hard to remember.
32017-04-23 21:37:35 UTCdamjang Bacause this is a phone number free only usable from Italy, if for you is ok, I will rechange to upper chars (phone:IT)
42017-04-24 09:36:57 UTCmueschel Yes, sure. It was my mistake.
12017-04-23 10:47:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
schaust du bei diesem Weg nochmal nach den beiden lanes* Tags? Da ist etwas schiefgegangen.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297874842

Gruss, Jan
12017-04-22 11:15:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
the correct tag "addr:housenumber" was changed to the wrong tag "adr:housenumber" on 18.000 buildings in this city. Some of these changes where done in this changeset.
Could you fix that - or let me know if you need help with it.

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-21 08:47:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du nochmal nach dem Tagging schauen '_vertical' ist ein ungewöhnlicher Key.

Gruß, Jan
12017-04-20 19:00:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the "housename" on this building?
http://osm.org/way/332283894

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-20 18:56:29 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du nochmal über diese 3 Relationen schauen? Eine ist nicht geschlossen, alle drei haben keinen Namen

http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159115
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159792
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159745

Gruß,...
12017-04-20 10:40:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
you tagged some buildings with "building:wall" and "building:roof". I replaced these tags with the common building:material and roof:material keys. These are in use in many places and are defined in the wiki.

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-20 13:51:21 UTChbrown14 Hi - Thanks! I feel so silly about this tagging mistake. I'll be sure to fix the remaining tag mistakes in this area.
Sudie
12017-04-15 16:38:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
it's a bit strange that this railway in Greece uses German signaling. Could you check that? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4790883029
Jan
22017-04-19 03:44:15 UTCLowe253 Hi Jan,
Greek Railways do actually uses german signalling although this might sound bizarre to people. This is not a full replication of ESO, but a lite version (no train protection system, no electrified rails until late 90's and so on). If you try wikipedia you can check also the historical reas...
32017-04-19 09:04:14 UTCmueschel Alright, I wasn't aware of this. I stumbled across it because of a spelling mistake: railway:signal:main:f should be railway:signal:main:form, I think.
42017-04-19 10:42:03 UTCLowe253 You are right, my bad...
12017-04-18 10:57:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
these POIs have some foreign tags that could (and should) be converted to usual OSM tags, e.g.
ACCESSIBLE
ADDRESS
ADDRESS_FR
NAME_FR
NOTES

Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan
22017-04-18 10:59:23 UTCRps333 I will have a look. thanks
12017-04-18 10:34:42 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du erfindest hier (mal wieder) Unmengen an neuen Tags. Bitte informiere dich über gängige Tags. In der jetztigen Form sind diese Informationen absolut nutzlos.
Beispiele:
bicycle situation
bicycle designating Sign\t
Bicycle path color to walkway
cycle end
cycle path quality\t...
12017-04-17 11:14:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this building, it has many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486855572

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-17 21:19:55 UTCEnigmaQuip Fixed, sorry about that
12017-04-13 08:36:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some nodes with tags light "light_source". Street lamps usually are tagged with "highway=street_lamp", which should be there additional to your tags. Would you mind adding it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-13 14:19:51 UTCMRPockets I specifically chose not to tag them as "highway=street_lamp" since they are not street lamps. They illuminate primarily the grass and sidewalks, not streets. I could not find any better tags for non-street lamps than simply "light_source=lantern." If I am misunderstanding the us...
32017-04-16 19:59:08 UTCmueschel I don't think we do distinguish between street lamps and path lamps. Until we come up with a distinction, I opt for tagging them with the common tag to make them visible on existing maps.
12017-04-16 16:32:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong with this import. The nodes are spread over the ocean...
Also, "Adresse" and "Nom" are no common tags in OSM and should be properly tagged.

Jan
22017-04-19 21:52:39 UTCSomeoneElse @mueschel no reply here so I've reverted these additions and sent the user a message that they have to read before continuing editing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1320 .
Best Regards,
Andy
12017-04-16 16:26:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put some urls to maps in the tags of these objects. I assume you used these as the source of your edits? To you have an permit to use these maps or are these licensed under a license compatible to ODbL?

Jan
22017-04-17 10:55:44 UTCemj Hej, nej detta är ett resultat av cykelturer sedan den snöfria nyårsaftonen till nu. Öppettiderna är från hemsidan dock, jag hade bara fotat dessa på tre av ställena.

Jag gör ganska många kartläggningar som jag inte lägger upp men n&...
32017-04-17 10:57:17 UTCemj English: Yes I've a ODBL + Contributors Term Compatible source for the edit. I'm sorry I was trollnig about the import.
12017-04-15 14:51:00 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier das highway-Tag entfernt, aber es laufen noch einige Wanderrouten über diesen Weg. Wie sieht das vor Ort wirklich aus?
http://osm.org/way/23325729

Gruß, Jan
22017-04-16 16:51:05 UTCmaction Hallo Jan,
nachdem die Neugestaltung der Rheinwiesen und der Uferpromenade gestartet war, hatte ich das Attribut highway der betroffenen Straßen und Wege entsprechend dem damaligen (4/2016) Zustand mit dem Lifecycle-Prefix demolished versehen. Heute sind die neuen und teils alten Straße...
12017-04-14 11:09:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added more than 6000 buildings with a misspelled house number tag: "adr:housenumber" instead of "addr:housenumber". Could you have a look and fix that? Let me know if you need help.

Jan
12017-04-12 11:29:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are six nodes like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4784899723
They don't have any common tag. Could you have a look?

Jan
22017-04-12 11:48:37 UTCzerpou Hi Jan,

I have integrated these points with her substations

Have a good day,

Albin
12017-04-12 10:36:21 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check the tagging of these 3 rivers?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485498407
The tag "Barranco del Pico = Rio Nuerna" looks a bit strange.
Jan
22017-04-12 11:44:39 UTCdalop Thanks for the advise, It was my mistake! I just fixed that now
12017-04-12 08:51:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 80 buildings with many foreign tags like the ones shown below.
I don't think they belong into the OSM database - can they be removed?

Cheers, Jan

ADAT=2013-05-08 09:04
ANDAMAL_1=130
ANDAMAL_10=0
ANDAMAL_1T=Bostad; Småhus friliggande
ANDAMAL_2=0
ANDAMAL_3=0
ANDAMAL_4=0...
22017-04-12 11:00:13 UTCDalkvist He was doing some incompatible sourced imports, they have stopped now and I have emailed dwg to redact the changesets.
12017-04-11 19:52:02 UTCBob Moin!
Eine no_entry restriction (hier: Deine Änderung an der Relation 6848355) kann mehrere from-Mitglieder haben, so steht es im Wiki. Das gelöschte Mitglied habe ich daher wiederhergestellt. Das aufgestellte Zeichen 267 betrifft beide Richtungen.
22017-04-11 20:02:08 UTCmueschel Auf den meisten Wiki-Seiten steht "exakt 1", auch auf der Deutschen. Nur die tschechische und englische Seite erlauben mehrere für no_entry.

Ich würde die Relation vielleicht lieber verdoppeln, je eine für jeden from-Weg. Wer weiß, welcher Router damit Probleme hat.
32017-04-12 10:42:00 UTCPeilscheibe @mueschel: Die no_entry und no_exit-restrictions wurden ja genau zu dem Zweck so definiert, das man eben nicht mehrere Relationen braucht, wo eine genügt. Wenn ein Router nicht mit mehreren from- bzw. to-ways klarkommt, darf er gerne dazulernen.
42017-04-12 15:54:14 UTCBob Moin zusammen!
Die deutsche Wiki-Seite ist dazu leider wohl veraltet. Sie kennt die no_entry und no_exit restriction (noch) nicht. Die kamen erst 2011 hinzu und die Übersetzung hat noch keiner angepackt.
12017-04-09 10:49:25 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier eine Tags neu erfunden, die sonst nirgends verwendet werden:

parking:condition:cost
parking:condition:duration
parking:condition:note
parking:condition:user\tparking:condition:vehicle

Bitte schau mal im Wiki nach den üblichen Tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w...
22017-04-10 07:01:55 UTCFrank Bielig Die Tags gibt es teilweise schon. Leider sind viele Tags mit entweder :both:, :right: oder :left: versehen. Hier trifft aber keine dieser Varianten zu.
32017-04-10 09:32:25 UTCmueschel "cost" -> "fee"
"interval" -> "time_interval"
"duration" -> "maxstay"
"vehicle" und "user" gibt es nicht, das muss über condition angegeben werden wenn es Einschränkungen gibt.

Die Tags gehö...
42017-04-10 10:36:40 UTCFrank Bielig "Die Tags gehören eigentlich an die Straße selbst, ..."
Das ist der eigentliche Diskussionspunkt. Bei der Wahl der Tagnamen sind wir leidenschaftslos, könnte auch immer leicht angepasst werden. Schwieriger ist der Punkt, wie die Geometrien aufgenommen werden. Wir haben u...
52017-04-10 11:32:25 UTCRalf Bielig "Die Tags gehören eigentlich an die Straße ..."

Das sehe ich dann problematisch, wenn:
* die Parkstreifen beider Straßenseiten physisch weit auseinander liegen, z.B. bei mehrspurigen Straßen.
* die Parkkonditionen sich alle paar Meter ändern oder auf beiden...
62017-04-10 11:48:00 UTCmueschel Ja, ideal ist das vorhandene Schema nicht. Ich denke, sowas sollte mal in größerer Runde diskutiert werden, z.B. im Forum mit ein paar gut ausgewählten Beispielen.
Das beste Tagging nützt ja am Ende nichts, wenn es die Auswerter nicht umsetzen wollen oder können.
72017-04-10 14:23:15 UTCNakaner Hallo Frank,

wer ist denn "wir"? Falls ihr organisiert oder mit kommerziellen Absichten in OSM editiert, solltet ihr das samt der Motivation und eurer Pläne offenlegen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
82017-04-10 15:53:52 UTCFrank Bielig Hallo Michael,
"uns", Kollegen mit großem Interesse an digitalen Karten und langjährige Nutzer von OSM, möchten nur helfen, ein weiteres Feature bei OSM zu etablieren, welches ein Grundübel des heutigen Straßenverkehrs in Metropolen beseitigen hilft: Parkpl&au...
12017-04-10 11:00:18 UTCmueschel Servus,
ich finde hier mehrmals "lity = sign" - sieht irgendwie nach Tippfehler aus.
Gruß, Jan
22017-04-10 15:27:12 UTCPeilscheibe Autsch. Vermutlich eine Teamleistung von Autovervollständigung und schnellem Finger ;-) Danke für's finden, ist repariert.
12017-04-04 14:34:50 UTCmueschel Could you please point me to the discussion page of this mechanical edit?
22017-04-04 19:14:35 UTCti-lo It's not mechanical, but manual
32017-04-04 19:29:41 UTCmueschel Even then, this has to be discussed beforehand (as you were told by the DWG this afternoon).
- > 600 objects edited worldwide within a single day
- in the ~ 10 cases I checked, some information was lost (e.g. used bikes and new bikes sales replaced by a single 'sales' tag)
- there are tags wit...
42017-04-09 14:00:19 UTCti-lo Sorry for the late answer, didn't get the notification somehow.
- Who is DWG ?
- Could you send me some examples for the "lost information" issue ?
- spelling mistakes shouldn't have happened as I mostly use copy & paste for the tags, but if you find errors, I'll correct them
- I c...
52017-04-09 15:33:33 UTCmueschel DWG = Data Working Group, the guys who gave you this block: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1293

lost information - this is very hard to find, given that you retagged thousands of stores and you have to look in the history of these nodes
"removing an established tagging scheme com...
62017-04-09 16:55:16 UTCti-lo Regarding DWG : Sent this message with explanations of my actions and was then unblocked immediately : woodpeck 4. April 2017 15:45
"well documented" is really an euphemism for the status before.
- (motorcycle) "clöthes" was not defined
- for "rental" there we...
72017-04-10 11:54:52 UTCDaveF Although this entity was tagged indirectly in the first place (it should be shop not amenity), you made it worse by removing any primary tag & substituting with a sole sub-tag. Sub-tags are 'adjective' tags which help describe the details of the objects.
82017-04-10 17:31:06 UTCti-lo That's right, I corrected it.
Pretty strange as I was sure I checked the entry when I answered ("Sorry for the late answer"). I once had an effect that a history entry disappeared (I edited an entry, later someone else edited it again, my edits were still there, but the history entry miss...
92017-04-10 17:41:43 UTCti-lo mea culpa, I checked the others, seems I didn't pay attention to this, correcting them now
12016-12-04 12:26:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "atl_name" on 40 nodes - this should be "alt_name". Would you mind correcting these?
Jan
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ksp
22017-04-02 15:23:52 UTCmueschel Hi (again),
this upload also contains several hundred nodes without any tags. Can these be deleted?
Jan
32017-04-02 16:44:56 UTCrashaurl Hello,
You do not need to delete them, these are blanks. Thank you
42017-04-08 14:44:38 UTCmueschel What do you mean by 'blanks'? Single nodes without tags are just useless.
52017-04-10 12:18:17 UTCrashaurl Billet, in order to then add tags.
I understandably wrote?
62017-04-10 12:18:51 UTCrashaurl i use gogle translate))
12017-04-08 11:43:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these buildings have a strange key that is not used in any other place:
tipo_const=NO CONVENCIONAL
What does it mean?
Btw, this looks a lot like an import, could you point me to the discussion and documentation of it on the mailing list or wiki?

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-08 11:40:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
what are all these tags you put on 250++ ways? They are new, not used anywhere else and don't seem to be documented.

escala=drenajes a 1:25000
estado_dre=5102
fecha_modi=08/04/2015
responsabl=Alejandra Gómez Sarmiento
ruleid=1
vigencia=0

Thanks, Jan
12017-04-07 19:48:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
'abandoned' is written 'abandoned' and not 'abandonded'. Could you have a look and correct this on >60 objects?
Cheers, Jan
22017-04-08 16:21:45 UTCChristian Madsen Thank you for the feedback. Looks like JOSM has replicated a misspelling instead of the correct phrase. I will change it first opportunity I get.
32017-04-13 17:46:24 UTCChristian Madsen There, I think got them all now. Please comment if there are anyone left.
12017-04-06 15:46:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added more than 120 buildings with the misspelled key 'buiilding'. Could you have a look and correct this?
Jan
12017-04-04 17:18:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of these tags?

numero_pis=1
numero_sot=0
tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL
tipo_domin=PRIVADO

Also, it looks like the images you use are misaligned, many of the buildings are intersecting the road (which seems to be in the right place according to GPS traces)
Could...
22017-04-04 23:15:20 UTCNicoVargas Yeah, it was caused by a direct import of an area not covered by the IGAC image we were using.

numero_pis=1 (# of floors )
numero_sot=0 (# of basement)
tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL (i think is a building with strong materials as cement, an so)
tipo_domin=PRIVADO (private)

This issue maybe remai...
32017-04-05 17:07:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
I can change the numero_pis to building:levels and building:levels:underground. I don't think we have an equivalent for the other two, should I delete them?
42017-04-05 17:34:30 UTCNicoVargas Yes please, replace it and delet it :) Many thanks
52017-04-05 18:48:45 UTCmueschel Ok, did in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47486023
12017-04-04 15:48:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377910114

The key 'ch]' looks like a mistake.
Jan
22017-04-04 19:47:24 UTCdudone Hi Jan

Many thanks for spotting this. I have removed the tag. There was also a highway=track tag missing for the way above this which I have now added.

Regards
Dudley
12017-04-02 15:46:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the name tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4766343316

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-03 07:01:24 UTCChristian Madsen Ops, my bad. Thanks for the feedback.
12017-04-02 15:38:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this building?
"Arme = Klarenstraat"
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70840140

Jan
22017-04-02 17:18:00 UTCJakka "Arme = Klarenstraat" deleted
12017-04-02 15:33:07 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du benutzt hier 70x den key "generator:mode" - das sollte eigentlich "generator:method" heißen. Korrigierst du das noch?

Grüße, Jan
12017-04-02 14:46:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
in this area you created a lot (~ 1000) of nodes without any tag which don't belong to a way or relation. I guess this was a mistake and they can be deleted?
E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/4311927621

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-02 14:42:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong on some of the buildings you added: The ways are not correct, containing some nodes more than once. Could you have a look and correct these? Here is a map with error markers (Keepright):
osm.mueschelsoft.de/keepright/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=48.62793&lon=38.93588...
12017-04-02 14:17:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
I noticed some issues with this (huge) import of ~20000 trees.
- The nodes have several tags which are not defined in the wiki, such as
age,constituency, form, plot_number, site_name, usrn, ward
- I didn't find a discussion on this import. Was it announced on the mailing list?
- the 'height...
22017-04-27 14:01:51 UTCbrianboru This is now documented for discussion at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Birmingham_City_Council_trees_data following talk-gb converstions and is paused until issues are resolved
12017-04-01 17:17:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:17:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
22017-04-02 11:02:16 UTCjohanespeter9 thank you so much, i am still clearing data let me rectify right now
12017-04-01 17:17:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:17:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:16:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:16:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:14:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like this import went wrong - there is a huge amount of foreign tags on the ways. Could you clean this up?
Jan
12017-04-01 12:38:19 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was ist denn das hier: http://osm.org/way/331073395
Eine Fußgängerbrücke? Dann sollte noch "highway=path" ergänzt werden.
Gruß, Jan
12017-04-01 12:17:44 UTCmueschel Wurde die von dir geänderte Kreuzung hier umgebaut? Im Augenblick stimmen die Wege nämlich nicht mehr mit Bing überein.
Gruß, Jan
12017-03-30 13:27:08 UTCmueschel Hallo,
fast 60 der Gebäude haben das Tag "roof:sharp" anstelle von "roof:shape". Kannst du das noch korrigieren?
Griß, Jan
22017-03-30 14:26:32 UTCanbr Ja, den Tippfehler habe ich korrigiert ...
12017-03-30 13:26:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 50 points with keys POINT_X and POINT_Y. I guess this was a mistake and should be deleted?
Jan
12017-03-26 15:00:57 UTCmueschel Hallo Micha,
kannst du rund um diesen Weg noch nach den Bus-Relationen und dem Spurtagging schauen? Das stimmt jetzt alles nicht mehr.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42937214

Gruß, Jan
12017-03-26 12:53:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 6 ways (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337771983) with the key "ad]" - could you check and correct this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-26 14:32:39 UTCTomas Straupis Fixed. Thank you for noticing.
12017-03-25 12:24:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
here are 749 buildings with the tag "_building_1_=yes". Could you fix that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-03-25 11:46:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of three ways, including this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482320633
other_tags = "surface"=>"unpaved","tracktype"=>"2"
specifiche =5
trekking =1

Jan
12017-03-24 08:41:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
du nutzt hier das Tag 'night_only'. Nachtbusse werden normalerweise mit "by_night = only" getagged. Vielleicht willst du das noch anpassen?
Gruß, Jan
22017-03-26 20:56:50 UTCFlutus Ich dachte schon dass es eines geben müsste, hab aber keins gefunden.
Ist geändert.
12017-03-22 11:38:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used these tags:
traffic_signals:ground = yes
traffic_signals:light = yes
They are not in use in any other place yet - what is their meaning?
Jan
22017-03-22 12:05:19 UTCmweper Hi @mueschel.
This news talks about the tags (invented by now) that I put, since I did not know if there was a tag for that.
-
http://rosarionoticias.gob.ar/page/noticias/id/77308/title/Se-puso-en-funcionamiento-el-primer-semáforo-peatonal-de-piso-del-país
--
I put both for the do...
32017-03-22 12:22:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
alright. I would go with the 'floor_light' version. Please add an entry to the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
Recently, a similar installation was made in the Netherlands.
42017-03-26 20:06:58 UTCmweper Is it okay like this?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#How_to_add_a_floor_light_for_pedestrians.3F
12017-03-22 11:29:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your changesets I found a huge set of wrong tags, like these:
High way = Footpath
Water ways = intermediate
farm land \t= farm

Please have a look to the wiki how paths, rivers and buildings are tagged and use only these tags. Everything else is useless, because none of our software ca...
12017-03-21 11:54:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag 'addr:contact = yes' on many POIs. This is a new tag and not defined anywhere - what does it mean?
Jan
Jan
22017-03-21 12:39:15 UTCTomas Straupis It is a temporary tag to mark duplicate addresses until contact:* scheme is approved or at least we (Lithuanian mapping community) come to agreement that support of contact:* is good enough. For the time being f.e. iD editor does not support contact:*
We need this addr:contact info for QA and later...
12017-03-21 11:05:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. in your edits you used tags like '2nd floor occupant', 'other occupants' and several similar ones. These are not defined in the wiki and therefore are rather useless because none of our software can understand it. Please have a look to the wiki how POI like offices and shops hav...
12017-03-20 13:32:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
Could you check the spelling of tags? I found many 'buiding:levels' with a missing 'l'.

Jan
22017-03-21 03:59:09 UTCJessAk71 Oops so sorry my mistake on the missing letter I will double check and fix all them next week. Thanks for letting me know.
12017-03-20 09:38:58 UTCmueschel Partially reverted. Reason: features do not exist.
12017-03-20 09:37:30 UTCmueschel I reverted this changeset. Reason: This is a stream, not a man_made=breakwater
12017-03-20 09:36:26 UTCmueschel I reverted this changeset. Reason: This is not a park.
12017-03-19 15:12:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you have a look to the spelling of tags? E.g. I found
'electrifie' which should be 'electrified'
name_fa -> name:fa
full_name_ -> full_name
and few more. I corrected some of them but I don't know if I catched all.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-19 15:03:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please make sure you use only keys which are described in the Wiki. If you use other keys (like ones in Russian), no software can understand it and e.g. display it on a map.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-20 08:35:28 UTCopeihatebot А смещение для спутниковых снимков кто будет устанавливать?
32017-03-20 09:19:20 UTCandygol Я відмінив цей набір змін (див. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47006199)

This changeset was reverted by me (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47006199)
42017-03-20 09:34:47 UTCandygol Шановний Виик
Зважаючи на факт, що це ваша перша спроба участі в ОСМ, пропоную вам ознайомитись з деякими статями у Вікі проекту, які допоможуть вам зробити ваші зм...
12017-03-19 14:59:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
did you consider using the 'destination_sign' tagging for these signs?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign

This makes using the data much simpler like on this sign:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinationsign/example/#node=3908107513
22017-03-19 20:58:22 UTCCarlo Folini Hi,
no...but I definitely have to take a look into it! It seems very interesting
12017-03-19 14:50:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4741782702

hig=yes looks like a mistake

Jan
12017-03-19 14:44:48 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier bei einigen Tags ein '-' vorangestellt um sie zu 'deaktivieren'. Normalerweise benutzt man dafür einen der lifecycle prefixes, wie hier beschrieben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Wahrscheinlich passt 'disused:' hier.
Gruß, Jan
22017-03-19 15:41:39 UTCProtoxenus Ja, meine Intention war, das das (wahrscheinlich defekte) Molenfeuer nicht gerendert wird. Ich gehe davon aus, das es zu Saisonbeginn wieder in Betrieb geht.
Ich hatte auch erst überlegt, das anders kenntlich zu machen, aber ich fand nichts passendes. "Disused" ist nach meinem Sprach...
12017-03-17 12:09:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
this area doesn't have any valid tag. Could you check this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480839466

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-17 14:38:12 UTCjohanemilsson I placed the leisure tag in a relation. I should probably just remove the other tags as they are not really necessary.
32017-03-18 12:49:02 UTCmueschel The relation is fine, but those tags should be deleted if they are not needed. Maybe you want to keep one tag with an ID to be able to match this object again with your external data source.
Jan
12017-03-18 12:46:47 UTCmueschel Hi, you used the new key 'name:Zh_py' on 59 ways. the common version is 'name:zh_py', used 900 times already. Would you mind changing this?

Cheers, Jan
12016-10-30 12:57:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
5500 nodes have a misspelled tag "addrpostcode".
Btw, are you sure that the license of your source allows use for OSM? CC BY and ODbL are not compatible!

Jan
22016-10-30 13:46:15 UTCdan980-import Hi, we got this authorization letter: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/7/77/Autorizzazione_sardegna_openstreetmap.pdf
32016-10-30 13:50:19 UTCmueschel Alright, maybe you can add a remark on the wiki page?
42016-10-30 13:51:46 UTCdan980-import yes, I'm gonna update it as soon as possible
52016-10-30 14:01:25 UTCsabas88 CC-BY-SA isn't compatible, CC-BY is (provided we add a proper attribution on the changeset)
62017-03-17 21:38:03 UTCmueschel cc-by is not compatible. See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
(Doesn't affect this import, because of the explicit authorization)
12017-03-17 15:12:06 UTCToniE Danke, wieder ein typo von mir?
22017-03-17 19:29:53 UTCmueschel Aus "surfarce" habe ich "surface" gemacht - passiert nun mal beim Tippen.
12017-03-17 12:11:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4303618075

The tag ref`... = grid_bin doesn't look right.

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-17 09:42:56 UTCbrianboru Finger trouble! Thanks - corrected
12017-03-17 11:53:09 UTCmueschel Hi, the trees you add have a strange tag: "2016 = 298". I corrected some yesterday, but there are more you added today. I guess it should be "ref = 2016.298". Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-03-16 11:37:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480408120
The tag is wrong - and I don't know how to correct it. Looks like 'landuse = forest', but I can't see a forest here, just few individual trees.

Jan
12017-03-16 11:17:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added areas with strange tags that are not defined anywhere, like these:
area \tyes
area6 \tsubarea6
name \tsubarea6

What did you try to tag here? Some type of boundary? Please check the wiki on how to tag them properly, in the current state this data can not be interpreted by any sta...
22017-03-20 19:11:49 UTCHausemer Problem fixed!
12017-03-15 16:58:16 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check the tagging of some of the buildings, e.g.

buildingxx:floor should be floor:material
building:walls should be building:material
building:roof should be roof:material

Those tags are described in the wiki, please check the other tags as well.

Jan
12017-03-15 16:15:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 59 objects with the key 'bulding'. Would you mind fixing this? 'building'

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-14 11:51:58 UTCmueschel Do these streets really have the German name as part of their official name? If not, please use name:de for the German name.
Jan
12017-03-14 11:34:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the keys "vertical height", "vertical_height", "vertical_rise" to map the height difference of aerialways. These tags are not used in any other place. Typically, start and end node of the aerialway are tagged with 'ele' to mark their respective height.
\...
22017-03-14 18:05:15 UTCIrakli Ika Ok I will use ele insted, thank you.
12017-03-14 11:29:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
den Key 'wheelchair:approachable' gibt es bis jetzt noch nicht. Ich würde da einfach "wheelchair = yes" setzen, und wenn es noch eine Einschränkung gibt mit "wheelchair:description" arbeiten.

Gruß, Jan
22017-03-14 12:20:41 UTCPeilscheibe Hallo,
klar gibt's den, hier zum Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4732885191 ;-)
wheelchair=yes beschreibt die Benutzbarkeit eines Objekts mit dem Rollstuhl selbst, z. B. als Attribut an einem Fußgängerüberweg oder einer Toilette.
Nähmen wir als Beispiel nun mal d...
32017-04-23 06:35:24 UTCJPaulW Hey,
in dem Changeset sind ein paar Änderungen von track->path und track->service die ich absolut nicht nachvollziehen kann. Könntest du mal erklären was du gegen track an den Stellen hattest?
Viele Grüße
42017-04-23 08:36:21 UTCPeilscheibe Hallo JPaulW,

klar, gerne.
Zunächst haben wir in der Systematik in OSM eine Unterscheidung in Wirtschaftswege für land- bzw. forstwirtschaftlichen Verkehr (track - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack), die Widmung ist regelmäßig durch Beschilderung erk...
12017-03-14 11:17:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag 'with' on 29 ways. It should be spelled 'width' - could you have a look and fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-03-17 15:22:57 UTCGuyVV Hi,
Bedankt voor het opmerken.
Hopelijk heb ik ze nu allemaal verbeterd.
Grt,
Guy
12017-03-13 21:28:43 UTCmueschel Hallo,
"fee:no = yes" - das Tag gibt es nicht. Entweder fee=yes oder fee=no, was stimmt?
Gruss, Jan
22017-03-13 22:02:47 UTCChemist72 Hast Recht, Jan. Sorry & danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit. Ich hatte es velwechsert mit payment:none=yes. Ist korrigiert. Es kostet nichts. Ist eh noch im Bau.
12017-03-13 21:23:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
found 3 ways with all strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480097548
Could you check & correct this?

Jan
22017-03-13 21:54:00 UTCEnigmaQuip Fixed, sorry about that
12017-03-13 21:21:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
schau dir mal das Tagging von diesem Way an, da ist was schiefgelaufen:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47435488

Gruss, Jan
22017-03-13 22:03:27 UTCbielebog Auha, das gehört _da_ nicht rein. Das war ein Cut'n Paste-Fehler. Gut gesehen, danke.
12017-03-13 19:14:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node? Looks weird.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4571244663

Jan
22017-03-14 00:37:24 UTCMacLondon Thanks Jan,
I have now corrected my completely mistyped entry to what I had intended to enter
12017-03-13 19:07:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used various spellings of the same key:
'physically _challenged'
'physically_challenged'
'physically_ challenged'
'physically challenged'
Please, use only one spelling, otherwise the data is rather useless. Also, please use tags that are already in use and don't invent new ones. 'physi...
12017-03-12 15:06:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
what are all these nodes? None of them has any tag. Could you check this and / or delete them?

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-12 13:01:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
are those 'meta' tags on this building really necessary? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436232310

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-12 12:46:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded 220 objects with the tag "Yess = Building". Could you correct this? 'building=yes' would be correct.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-12 12:36:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
On this node you used some non-English keys to describe the object: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4726295753

In OSM one must use common tags as described in the Wiki - otherwise the information can not be interpreted correctly by software. Please have a look to the wiki ...
12017-02-23 10:12:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
habe hier gerade ein paar 'backwart' in 'backward' korrigiert.

Und ein kleiner Tipp:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121635637
Die Angabe der Autobahn hier ist ein Fall für destination:ref:to und destination:symbol:to weil es sich um einen Hinweis auf eine zu erreichende, aber entfer...
22017-02-24 13:03:09 UTCsennewald63 Hallo mueschel,
danke für die Berichtigung von 'backward' .
Mite dem destination:ref:to und destination:symbol:to stehe ich auf Kriegsfuß, da es für mich zu unausgegoren ist.
Im Proposed features/Destination details https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination...
32017-02-24 18:04:32 UTCmueschel Hier hatte ich mal eine kleine Zusammenstellung im Wiki gemacht:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging

Mein Tool ist da sicher nicht das Maß der Dinge - ich rendere einfach das, was ich für wichtig halte. Zur besseren Darstellung sind die :to nur ein kle...
42017-03-10 19:10:38 UTCsennewald63 Ich habe mir deine Erklärungen unter "User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging" nochmal rein gezogen und dabei drei Probleme gefunden.
1. Du solltest mit angeben, dass auch "destination:symbol:to*" für die Einsortierung des entsprechenden Symbols notwendig ist.
2. Die Farbe b...
52017-03-11 13:55:09 UTCmueschel Lass uns das per Mail besprechen, ich schreibe dir gerade.
12017-03-10 08:17:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/253789222
There are several 'linz:' tags on thia node - was this a mistake?
Jan
22017-03-10 08:41:19 UTCworldwidewolford It looks like those tags predate my edit. I am on and have been editing on mobile, so any research you can do into those tags would be great, but they were not added by me.
Cheers
32017-03-10 15:55:24 UTCmueschel Before your edit the keys were in upper case, e.g. LINZ:layer. These are very common in NZ.
You changed it to lower case - might be a software issue with OsmAnd?
42017-03-10 20:31:14 UTCworldwidewolford Oh wow. This must be an issue with OsmAnd. I will send a bug report about that. Could you fix those tags for me? Thanks for picking that up.
52017-03-11 13:41:59 UTCmueschel Changed the tags back.
12017-03-11 13:37:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you added many buildings with the tag "addr:pro" which should be "addr:province". Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nqy
12017-03-10 09:27:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded a huge sset of objects, which are mainly tagged with foreign tags which most likely should not appear in Osm. Could you check and correct this?
Jan

Examples:
ACCESS_TYP=Open Access
ACRES=48.743
AGNCY_ID=1328
AGNCY_LEV=City
AGNCY_NAME=Scotts Valley, City...
22017-03-10 17:34:49 UTCstevea I wouldn't say "huge" as it is a few dozen edits over the course of a few hours in a single day (and I'm not done yet) against the over 12,000 edits I have entered over the last eight years.

Is your problem with "foreign tags?" I kept these in to distinguish these CPAD polygo...
32017-03-10 17:56:39 UTCmueschel I didn't complain about the import of the polygons as such. That's fine if it is done carefully.
I'd suggest to keep one ref tag only, like ref:CPAD. This should be sufficient to allow for future updates.

Other tags like ACRES and COUNTY are just redundant because they can easily be retrieved f...
42017-03-10 18:06:41 UTCstevea Thank you for your quick reply. I can certainly endeavor to reduce and/or conflate tags on future CPAD polygon entries, as I do agree that they do contain a large amount of metadata. Some is useful and some is not (to OSM) and as long as a polygon in OSM can be identified as mapping back to a uniq...
12017-03-10 09:35:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw several keys with spaces in your edits. Please check the spelling of keys. Examples:

'fire operator' -> 'fire_operator'
'water tank: street' -> 'water_tank:street'
(and several more)
Jan
12017-03-10 09:29:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used some new landcover tags in your edits to specify density and age. I think it would be a good idea to describe these tags in the wiki by writing a proposal for them.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-10 14:15:16 UTCigitov Hi,
thanks for comment.
These landcover tags are still "raw", not final.
In the Russian-speaking OSM-community there is a discussion on the scheme for tagging landscapes (woodlands, shrubs, etc.). Much can change. Writing proposal still premature.
12017-03-10 09:23:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded almost 100 nodes with a spelling mistake: 'toilest' instead of 'toilets' - could you have a look an fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-10 09:22:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:21:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:20:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:20:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:19:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:19:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-09 08:57:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
this node doesn't seem to be tagged right. Could you putsome common tags there?

Jan
12017-03-08 08:58:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
There are several ways with a lot of strange tags here, like 'gdforderen'. Could you check and fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-03-08 10:57:18 UTCLogicalViolinist Do you have a way id? I might have missed deleting the garbage from geobase/toporama if not I can try to look for it
32017-03-08 12:42:52 UTCLogicalViolinist Think I found it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478904955
I'll fix it up
42017-03-08 14:06:15 UTCmueschel Here is a link to overpass turbo:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nlu
3 ways left.

Thanks for taking care!
Jan
52017-03-08 14:43:59 UTCLogicalViolinist shouldn't be any left, thanks for the heads up :)
12017-03-07 13:17:03 UTCmueschel Hallo,
Ich habe hier öfters das Tag "parking:conditions" gefunden - das gibt es sonst nirgends. Du meinst sicher "access=...". Schaust du da nochmal drüber?

Gruß, Jan
22017-03-07 14:55:21 UTCKeineHeimat Hallo,
ich habe das feature hier gelesen: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking:lane#Definieren_der_Parkplatznutzung

Gruß,
Jan
32017-03-07 15:15:54 UTCmueschel Dieses Tag wird für Parkstreifen entlang von Straßen verwendet, nicht für Parkplätze. Mir ist es deswegen aufgefallen, weil du "conditions" mit "s" schriebst.
42017-03-07 19:15:22 UTCKeineHeimat Upps, ändere ich die Tage - bin im Moment unterwegs!

Gruß
Jan
12017-03-07 09:23:15 UTCmueschel Please don't change the established wikipedia tag to things like
described-in-wikipedia
described_in_wikipedia
listed_in_wikipedia
listed-in-wikipedia
and so on. Such changes have to be discussed first.

Jan
22017-03-07 14:20:17 UTCnyuriks Hi, you are right that they need to be more organized. I made a proposal for it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikipedia_tag_types

Also, thanks to wikidata, we can clean up wikipedia tags now (almost 2,000 already done):
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Yurik/OSM_wiki_t...
12016-08-19 12:51:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
der Key "healthcare_speciality" gibt es sonst nicht, das sollte "health_specialty:XYZ" heißen. Siehe
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/health_specialty#similar

Gruß, Jan
22016-08-19 17:43:57 UTCFischkopp0815 Danke, ich habe es korrigiert
32017-03-05 19:08:06 UTChighflyer74 Moin Ihr zwei!

Genau genommen muß es nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare getaggt werden. Also healthcare:speciality=*

Gruss aus HB!
42017-03-05 19:18:47 UTCmueschel Das ist ein "konkurrierendes" Tagging Schema. Beide sind ähnlich oft in Verwendung (etwa 11000 zu 7000) und beide sind im Wiki dokumentiert (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0/Specialties ) U.a. erlaubt es eine feinere Abstufung und einfacheres Taggen...
52017-03-06 05:48:10 UTChighflyer74 Moin Jan! Ja, richtig. Ich erinnere mich gerade wieder, das wir das Thema beim Bremer Treffen erörtert hatten, uns dann aber für das andere entschieden haben, da das von Dir angesprochene nie über den Proposal Status hinauskam. Eigentlich eine unhaltbare Situation für ein nicht g...
12017-02-26 12:44:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
you imported a lot of points with elevation data in this changeset.
Please note that the tagging is wrong and because of that these points can not be used in OSM. Elevations are tagged using the 'ele' key. Sources should be given in the changeset source tag, but not individually on each of th...
22017-02-26 15:12:54 UTCptal_io Thank you for the comment. I have removed the erroneous tags and added ele tags as well as source information to the changeset commit.
32017-03-05 15:48:21 UTCmueschel All the wrong tags are still there and have not been deleted.
42017-03-05 17:20:18 UTCptal_io Apologies. This has been rectified in changeset 46600439
12017-03-05 15:43:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
you essentially flooded a huge area by adding landuse=basin to large polygons. Also, most of the tags are from a foreign source and do not belong into the OSM database:
NUNIVOTTO6=843131
NUNIVOTTO7=8431311
Shape_Area=2.42385595961E8
Shape_Leng=79016.1029871
surface=2423...
12017-03-05 15:34:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please pay a bit of attention to the spelling of keys - I found various versions of the word "wheelchair" in your edits. With spelling mistakes these tags can not be understood by any software.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-05 13:31:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
17 of the nodes have the strange key "|ODS:nevenadres" - could you check that? Pipes in keys are not common.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-05 18:01:37 UTCde vries Yes I know, I'll fix it. I postponed fixing it for debug reasons .
12017-03-05 12:50:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag on this way - was it a mistake?
Cheers, Jan

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477789206
22017-03-05 12:55:27 UTCFvGordon Please ask the creator of version 1.
Greetings, Franz
32017-03-05 13:15:41 UTCmueschel Sorry, I didn't see this changeset - but thanks to his changeset comment it is clear it should be 'source'.
12016-10-05 07:52:28 UTCAthalis Hallo greecemapper,

woher stammen denn die ganzen name Tags? Sicherlich nicht von Bing ;) Kannst du noch eine Quelle angeben (hier im Changeset Kommentar sollte reichen) damit das in Zukunft noch nachvollziehbar ist?
22017-03-05 12:44:19 UTCmueschel Sieht für mich so aus als sollten zumindest die Flurnamen revertiert werden solange die Legalität der Quelle nicht klar ist.
12017-03-03 20:50:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key 'Q' quite often in this changeset, what is it supposed to mean? Could you check and correct this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-04 14:25:12 UTCMr BA Demba corrigé
12017-03-03 20:44:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
Here are five ways with the tag "tt=both" - could you correct this?

Jan
22017-03-03 22:22:56 UTCMeredith Rider Thanks for catching that. I'll get it fixed!
Meredith
12017-03-02 11:49:32 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du diesen Node checken? "Düne = Düne" ist kein sinnvoll definiertes Tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4707353849

Gruß, Jan
12017-03-02 11:47:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this house?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287233238
The street name looks wrong and there is another tag that looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-02 12:23:09 UTCThunder08 Thank you! I fixed it.
12017-03-02 11:45:18 UTCmueschel Hallo modea,
willkommen bei OSM!
Du hast hier Hydranten eingetragen. Überlicherweise werden solche Objekte nur als Punkt und nicht als Linie eingetragen. Das Tag "hydrant=yes" wird leider von keiner Software verstanden. Schau mal im Wiki nach, dort ist erklärt wie Hydranten get...
22017-03-04 08:59:50 UTCanesthesia Halo modea,
du hast Gebäude doppelt (zb Hausnummer 33, 77 und 78) sowie Linien (ways) und Punkte (Nodes) ohne Tags erfasst.
Die Kapelle ist nun 3x vorhanden: einmal von mir; einmal von dir mit Tag und einmal ohne.

Güße,

32017-03-04 09:06:04 UTCanesthesia PS: du verwendest eine Uuuuuralte JOSM Version. die ist schon sechs Jahre alt. Eine aktuelle Version gibt es hier: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Download
12017-03-02 11:40:04 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du diesen Hydranten nochmal überprüfen? "fire_pressure" ist kein sinnvolles Tag. Außerdem werden Kommazahlen wie im Englischen mit Punkt geschrieben.
Gruß, Jan
22017-03-02 13:40:12 UTCkphklaus doofer Fehler, habe ich korrigiert.
viele Grüße
kph
12017-03-02 11:36:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this edit? You added a bus route that consists of a parking lot only.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7013865

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-02 11:33:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this area? Looks like something went wrong with the name tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317391337

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-02 13:37:05 UTCFredrikLindseth Ah, a typo. I fixed it now :-)
12017-03-02 11:31:56 UTCmueschel Hallo,
der Key "recycling:opening_hours" wird außer hier nirgends verwendet. Üblicherweise wird "opening_hours" ohne Prefix verwendet. Würdest du das anpassen?

Gruß, Jan
22017-03-02 12:10:19 UTCbezin Hi, ja, völlig richtig. Da hab ich gepennt. Passe ich an – auch für die Änderungen in Überruhr-Holthausen.
32017-03-03 08:31:52 UTCbezin Gilt entsprechend auch für recycling:operator, der so nicht existiert, sondern auch ohne Prefix verwendet wird. Auch das passe ich an.
12017-03-01 11:30:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the spelling of keys in your latest changesets? E.g. I saw
water tank :housenumber
water tank: housenumber
water tank:street

There should be no spaces in the key and 'water_tank' has an underscore.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-01 11:26:54 UTCmueschel HI,
could you check the tagging of some of these objects? They have russian keys only and no common keys used in other places in OSM.
Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476958046

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-03 01:02:50 UTCJake Strine Yes, it's a mistake. Fixed.
12017-03-01 11:24:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Tagging schauen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4701196968
Da steht " 7710052 = underground"

Gruss, Jan
22017-03-01 12:08:47 UTCmentor2002 Sorry,
danke für den Hinweis... das hat sich der Copy - Paste Fehlerteufel eingeschlichen.
12017-02-28 15:13:35 UTCmuralito Would'nt it be better to use tag "rooms" instead of "number_of_apartments"?
22017-02-28 15:20:24 UTCmueschel I just corrected the obvious spelling mistake in the key.
'number_of_apartments' is already used 1800 times, so I consider it a valid tag. I don't know if there are cases where someone distinguished between number of rooms and number of apartments on a single object.
12017-02-28 11:57:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
if you want to tag names in foreign languages: The language has to be given as ISO-639 code, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cree_language has the code 'cr' and Innu has 'moe'.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-28 11:50:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. Most of the tags you put on this node are rather useless, because they don't follow established tagging styles. Please have a look to the Wiki, e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features. There is a list of common tags.

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-28 15:10:59 UTCmuralito And/Or maybe ask for help to the Iocal community.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India
12017-02-28 11:47:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2699648841
It has two contradicting tacticle_paving tags.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-28 11:41:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
I would like to point you to this Wiki page that describes how charging stations for electric cars can be tagged:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
Cheers, Jan
12017-01-20 11:42:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many foreign tags on 133 roads in your changesets, like these:
Cod_via=20478
Cod_viaOld=0
DUG=VIA
Etichetta=VIA PEZZALUNGA
ISTAT=63001.0
Lunghezza=130.94
Toponimo=PEZZALUNGA
Tratto=15
f_node=1346

They all look like they do not belong into the OSM database and were added by m...
22017-02-27 20:13:39 UTCmueschel I think that this changeset has to be reverted - we can not make sure that the license of this data is compatible with ODbL if you don't disclose your source.
12017-02-27 11:52:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of the tag "hiter=ter" you put on several ways here?

Jan
22017-02-27 12:44:47 UTCff5722 That should be highway=tertiary
I sometimes make typos and JOSM keeps suggesting those until restart. I will correct it asap.
12017-02-27 11:50:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
you managed to get three spelling mistakes in this turn restriction: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6997873

Actually, you don't need this relation, it is better to add access tags to the short service way. E.g. access=emergency.
12017-02-27 11:48:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way got two distance tags, one is misspelled. Could you check which one is right?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3115311666

If there are two values given, you can add them to the same tag, separated by ';'

Jan
12017-02-27 11:46:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
all the objects have the tag "Horta = Vella" - was this a mistake?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-27 21:57:21 UTCpacopac Corrected! Was a mistake. Thanks for pay attention
12017-02-27 11:44:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used highway=project here - this tag is not used often. There are other values that are defined in the wiki, maybe you can change the tagging to one of these?
planned
proposed
preproposed
construction

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-27 13:27:43 UTCbibi6 Hi, I'm going to change these to "planned". Thanks ;)
32017-02-27 13:34:49 UTCbibi6 ... I actually decided to use "proposed", as the way may change - but it will probably not. Wait and see ^^
12017-02-26 13:08:47 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du hier nach dem Namen schauen? Da scheint etwas beim Tagging schiefgegangen zu sein.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38805790

Gruß, Jan
22017-02-26 17:21:45 UTCOF0 Ja, da war was schiefgegangen. Muss
name=Schönertsee
heißen. Habe es korrigiert.

Danke für den Hinweis.
12017-02-25 12:38:15 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check this way?
http://osm.org/way/30833729
Something went wrong with the name tag.
Cheers, Jan
12017-02-23 11:35:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the keys railway:date_start and :date_end. The usual key for this is railway:start_date and :end_date.
Could you have a look and correct this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-02-26 16:20:44 UTCsfrank Hi,
I fixed it. Was accidently used, because first I used date:start and date:end.
Frank
12017-02-23 11:23:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 62 buildings have a spelling mistake in the tags: 'add:province' instead of 'addr:province'. Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-24 15:26:08 UTCgiorosel Hi jan,
thanks for checking, i've already fixed it
12017-02-23 09:46:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
this changeset generated a lot of objects with a huge number of tags that are not documented and seem to have been added by mistake during this import.

Jan
22017-02-23 09:57:41 UTCBgabor Hi,
All 4000 points a certain water sources in the area and all attached attribute is important.
32017-02-23 10:02:50 UTCmueschel If this information is important, I suggest to use common tags that can be parsed by existing software.
Btw, I don't see a connection to hotosm project 2525 you mention in the changeset comment. Has this import of data been discussed on the appropriate mailing list? Is this data really 'open'? The...
42017-02-26 19:48:11 UTCedvac Hi:
If this is an import and haven't been discussed, it should be reverted inmediatly.
Imports have to be discussed with the local community and with the imports list, and should be documented and the source compatible with the ODbL.
52017-02-28 15:03:58 UTCmuralito No doubt it is an import. It should be reverted, or at least discussed, fixed and the resulting new tags documented.

62017-03-03 01:14:37 UTCedvac This import has been reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46535966
Please, read and follow the imports guidelines (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) before doing any import. Imports have to be documented, been given ODbL compatible permission by the copyright owners...
72017-03-07 23:31:18 UTCSomeoneElse Hello Bgabor,
Just to echo what has been said above - if you want to import data please do read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and follow the links from it.
If you've got any questions you can either mail the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org or ask on the "imports"...
82017-03-08 10:29:54 UTCBgabor Hi,

I will send a letter for the National Bureau of Statistics to Tanzania, and ask them to clarify the licenses for all data from http://opendata.go.tz/ website.

PS: thank you for your efforts...

Gabor
92017-03-08 12:05:29 UTCmuralito Hello Bgabor:

If the terms & conditions are the same as stated in http://opendata.go.tz/en/pages/kanuni-na-masharti , I'm not sure if the d) paragraph is compatible with ODbL.

Maybe in this case we need explicit permission from the owner to import their data into OSM.
102017-03-08 12:39:44 UTCSomeoneElse @Bgabor,
I'd suggest having this discussion on the "imports" list - there people will be able to advise you about licenses.
See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-February/004819.html for where this import was first mentioned there.
Best Regards,
Andy
12017-02-22 11:24:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this fire station? There seems to be some typing error I can't fix.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-21 12:15:15 UTCmueschel http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475067209
parking:lane:right:vertical = yes

Wirklich vertikal?
22017-02-22 11:29:32 UTCsoemisch Mueschel,

danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe den Datensatz in "perpendicular" korrigiert.

Viele Grüße, Lars
12017-02-21 10:15:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several buildings on top of already existing ones. Could you have a look and correct these mistakes?
Additionally, all tags you added have no meaning in OSM - only well-defined tags as described in the Wiki can be used. Examples:
Capacity \t=80
Condition \t=average
Levels \t=1
Pu...
12017-02-18 18:04:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
from this changeset there are still hundreds or thousand untagged and unconnected nodes in the database. As they are completely useless - could you take some time to clean this up?
Let me / the community now if you have trouble or need help!

Jan
22017-02-20 13:41:05 UTCIvan Garcia Could you send me the link of some ofthe unconnected nodes? I will take a look at it.
thks for the alert.
32017-02-20 13:50:27 UTCmueschel Here is a link to Keepright tool - this link just shows this type of unconnected node - you have to move the map to see more errors, only ~300 are shown at a time. Actually, they seem to be from different changesets, but all by 'importer2015'.

http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/keepright/report_map.php?z...
42017-02-20 14:07:36 UTCIvan Garcia You are right. I will have time from next week to remove those.
52017-03-04 22:34:45 UTCIvan Garcia All orphan nodes cleaned.
12017-02-19 09:33:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

In your edits I saw some keys that contain non-english keys. All keys should be in English only and use the well-defined names described in the wiki.
Here is a list of these objects - could you have a look and correct them?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/mPE
Let me know if you...
12017-02-19 08:56:11 UTCmueschel Hi
welcome to OSM. You put many tags on the objects you added - but unfortunately they can't be used by any OSM based software. Most of the keys you used are not well-defined and are not understood by other users. Please have a look at the wiki to find out how e.g. buildings are commonly tagged.
\...
12017-02-18 18:08:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you un-deleted a large number of nodes in this changeset, like
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3509954079/history
These nodes seem to be useless now. Could you have a look and remove them again? Let me / the community know if you need help!

Jan
12017-01-09 10:04:57 UTCmueschel Hallo,
no exit schreibt sich no_exit.

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-14 08:05:10 UTCmtbbiker99 Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis.

Geht so auch: noexit ?
Gruß Oliver.
32017-02-17 12:12:47 UTCmueschel Ja natürlich. noexit ist korrekt, ich weiß gar nicht mehr warum sich da ein _ in meinen Kommentar eingeschlichen hat.
Sorry für die späte Antwort, habe ich übersehen!
12017-02-17 12:11:18 UTCmueschel Kannst du hier mal drüberschauen? An vielen Objekten hängt jetzt eine Mailadresse als Tag (teilweise mehrfach)

Gruß, Jan
12017-02-17 11:58:48 UTCmueschel You (again) added many useless tags on buildings, e.g. here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363504576
You removed the valid tags and put new ones. All of these are useless for OSM because they don't follow normal tagging rules.

Jan
12017-02-16 21:29:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of your edits? In OSM, the Keys must be well defined, like "name=". For example you wrote
زمین والیبالname=زمین والیبال روستا
this should be:
name=زمین والیبال روستا
And several other, similar ones. Could you f...
12017-02-16 21:26:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the key "bycycle" 20 times in these edits. Could you fix the spelling - "bicycle"?
Cheers, Jan
12017-02-16 21:09:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
this node has the tag "Stupava = Svätý Jur" which looks like a mistake. Could you check that?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/530544357
Jan
22017-02-17 08:26:48 UTCwmyrda Hi,
It is indeed. Not sure what I meant there, but probably just a copy&paste error when I wanted to add "name:pl=Svätý Jur" just like the name in polish Wikipedia is. I'll fix that one to it.
12017-02-16 21:08:09 UTCmueschel Hallo,
schau mal nach dieser Plattform, da hat das Tagging Tippfehler:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261111877

Gruss, Jan
22017-02-16 21:12:00 UTCWeltstaat allerdings!
Danke, habs ausgebessert.
Grüsse, Jonathan
12017-02-16 21:02:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier hast du den Key "Dorfkirche" verwendet - sollte das ein name-Tag werden?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326815203
12017-02-16 21:02:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier hast du den Key "Dorfkirche" verwendet - sollte das ein name-Tag werden?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326815203
12017-02-16 21:01:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
am Node 73580256 hängt ein komisches Tag:
Burgkapelle = Burgwiese

Gruß, Jan
22017-02-16 21:29:27 UTCNetzwolf Copy+Paste & v(Finger)>v(Hirn) → Unfug
Ist getilgt. Danke für den Hinweis.

Mehr Spaß mit Attributen gibt's täglich frisch hier:
http://geo.netzwolf.info/csv/bad_attributes_k_eq_v.csv.bz2
http://geo.netzwolf.info/csv/bad_attributes_k_norm.csv.bz2
http://geo.netzwolf...
12017-02-16 12:49:21 UTCmueschel Could you check the tagging? "Gegevens =Binnenwegplein" looks like a mistake.
Jan
12017-02-16 12:39:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
this node got the key "no_end". Did you mean no_exit?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4682479131
Cheers, Jan
12017-02-16 11:49:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many buildings with the tag "building=yes=house" - could you fix that? "building = house" would be correct.

Jan
12017-02-15 08:47:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded some buildings with a missing building=yes tag. Also, there are some with two building:levels tags, one is misspelled. Could you have a look and fix these issues?

Jan
12017-02-14 21:30:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of tags, e.g. "destinarion = Ponta Grossa, Retorno"
I found several times a spelling mistake in 'destination' or ':lanes' - I corrected them where I found them.
Secondly, the normal separator between destinations is a ';', not a comma.

Ch...
12017-02-14 21:02:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found keys like "destination:lanes:ref" in your edits. The correct order is "destination:ref:lanes" - :lanes comes at the end. I fixed that for you.

Here is a generic string to show the order for all those suffixes:
key[:subkey][:hgv|:bicycle|...][:lanes][:forward|:bac...
22017-02-16 12:23:38 UTCmweper Oops. Thanks for notifying me and fix it. I did not realize.
12017-02-14 19:00:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
you tagged 90 buildings with "building:levell=1" - could you correct the spelling mistake ('levels' instead of 'levell' )?

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-14 18:59:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
you tagged 20 buildings with "building;material=cement_block" - could you correct the spelling mistake (';' instead of ':' )?

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-14 18:56:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "AlYf=Recordings" on many nodes. This tag is not used in any other place. I don't know what it means. Could you check if there is another way to tag this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-21 16:29:11 UTCshirasayu Corrected
12017-02-13 11:42:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "tire=yes" on this building:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370563749
It looks like spelling mistake, could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-13 19:09:22 UTCalexhyd18 Hello. Thanks for attention.
If it looks like mistake, then what I must write to indicate the presence of tire correctly?
32017-02-13 19:12:52 UTCmueschel Can you describe what it is? A shop where you can buy tires? That would be shop = tyres
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtyres
42017-02-13 19:17:51 UTCalexhyd18 It's a place where where anyone can make a mountage of tires
52017-02-13 19:32:59 UTCmueschel Ok, now I got it. I would tag it as:

shop = car_repair (Even if it is not a shop - to give the category of the object)
service = tyres
self_service = yes
fee = no / yes
description = (describe it in your own words, Russian is fine)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dcar
12017-02-13 11:48:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this object?
http://osm.org/way/473866994
The tag doesn't look right:
Mahall Türkerler=government
12017-02-13 11:38:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put a non-standard tag in Russian language on this node. Unfortunately this doesn't help OSM, because software can only understand well-defined tags. Could you have a look to the OSM wiki to find a better suited tag for this? man_made=pier could be one of them.
22017-02-14 14:47:14 UTCPavel_TCH Thank you for your note
12017-02-13 11:32:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You put the tag "clinica = yes" on this building:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402795000

Unfortunately, this is not really useful, because the tag is not well-defined and no software can understand it. Please have a look to the wiki how hospitals need to be ma...
12017-02-12 13:47:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier nochmal nach dem Kreisel schauen? Der ist irgendwie zweispurig getaggt. Und ist das wirklich so gedacht, dass die Straße im Norden nicht angeschlossen ist?
http://osm.org/way/321022076

Gruß, Jan
22017-02-12 21:44:18 UTChca Hej!
Die lanes waren ein Überbleibsel des früheren Straßenverlaufs (vor dem Bau des Kreisels), das ich vergessen hatte. Habe ich entfernt -- danke für den Hinweis!
Was mit der Straße im Norden -- Hünfelder Straße -- werden soll, weiß ich auch nicht. Als...
12017-02-12 13:10:40 UTCmueschel "Privatweg", "Seltsame Kirr-Konstruktion", "Jagdfläche"... das sind alles keine Namen von Objekten.
12017-02-11 12:33:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "destination:tag" that is not used in any other place. Could you explain the meaning or find another common tag?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-13 09:35:12 UTCinah_telenav Hi
Sorry I missed understood, I was suppose to put destination:street.
I uploaded the reviewed version.
12017-02-11 12:27:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
You created many objects without any tag describing what it is. Could you review these changes and add tags like those described in the Wiki?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-11 12:25:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
You created many objects without any tag describing what it is. Could you review these changes and add tags like those described in the Wiki?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-10 11:52:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many POIs with tags like these:
Categoria=B
Denominaci=peluqueria manicura spa
Nombre=STAR COIFFURE
Numero=3
Tipo=CYS

These are rather useless because the tagging does not follow the established schemes. They can't appear on any map unless you use normal tags...
12017-02-09 12:08:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
please trace buildings a bit more carefully - there are no buildings here of the size and shape you draw them. Most of the actual buildings were already mapped by others. I reverted your changeset to clean this up.
Jan
12017-02-09 11:51:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this relation? The tag "tt = no" looks like a mistake.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/969201

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-09 12:11:24 UTCPetr1868 opraveno
12017-02-09 11:45:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "crown_type: = I" on ~13 trees. Could you correct this mistake (there is no ':' in the key?
22017-02-09 12:54:52 UTCLucFreitas Thanks. Fixed in changeset 45946425.
12017-02-08 15:13:28 UTCrskedgell I can find a reference for xxx:inscription_date=* in the wiki, when used in combination with heritage=* and heritage_operator=xxx, where xxx is the abbreviation for the operator, in this case he for Historic England - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage#Tags_to_use_in_combination
...
22017-02-08 15:31:07 UTCmueschel Oh, you're right.
To me this looked like the typical mistake when autocompletion failed. On the same POIs you used heritage:* as well, so this made it rather plausible. "heritage:operator" and "heritage:inscription_date" formed a nice group of tags and made a lot of sense.

I...
32017-02-08 19:48:13 UTCmueschel Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45928032
12017-02-08 12:01:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
in the last weeks I found this tag rather often:
he:inscription_date
I think it should be
heritage:inscription_date

Could it be a copy and paste problem?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-08 15:31:48 UTCrskedgell The "Tags to use in combination" table in the wiki article for the key heritage at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage#Tags_to_use_in_combination has:
heritage:operator=*\txxx\tsee table under abbreviation
and
xxx:inscription_date=*\t\tDate when the object was added to the ...
32017-02-08 15:32:34 UTCmueschel For the records:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45431514

he:inscription_date is correct.
42017-02-08 15:52:36 UTCrskedgell Thanks - it's perhaps not the most obvious tagging scheme and probably did look a lot like a typo.
12017-02-08 11:39:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "Village tract" on many objects - this is not a defined tag in OSM. What is its purpose?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-08 12:32:26 UTCОлег Самуйлов Hi,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Village_tract
Cheers
32017-02-08 14:55:47 UTCmueschel Ah, I see.
The key you used doesn't fit well into the usual tagging schemes.
What is used quite often are keys like
is_in:township or
is_in:ward

I didn't find some established tagging of village tracts right now. So, I would suggest for your purpose:
is_in:tract or
is_in:villagetract
...
12017-02-08 12:06:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
please update your maps.me app. Yours has a bug and adds a wrong tag:
"banner_url = https://is.gd/UoIIyn"
12017-02-08 11:56:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag recycling:Emballages =yes - tags should always be in English. An often used key is
recycling:plastic_packaging
Does it fit?

Jan
12017-02-07 22:56:02 UTCFortepc There was no reason to remove those tags. They were accurate information relevant to the POIs they were attached to.
22017-02-08 11:49:11 UTCmueschel see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45848069
OSM is not a map of non-existing graphics in some game.
32017-02-08 17:27:39 UTCFortepc I was not mapping ingame graphics. I was tagging real world objects referencing that they also exist in the ARG. It's just as relevant as referencing their facebook pages that you didn't remove.
12017-02-06 11:35:47 UTCmueschel Please stop adding ingress and pokemon features. OSM does not contain such ficitional objects.
22017-02-07 22:52:17 UTCFortepc @Mueschel you're suggesting OSM doesn't contain Freedom Park? you're sorely mistaken. Sorry for the confusion but my changeset updated the accuracy of the park on the ground, as well as added relevant information in the tags.

Thanks for your concern, but try again next time with that high horse ...
32017-02-08 11:42:34 UTCmueschel Is Freedom Park fictional? Can I see it when walking there? So yes, it should be in OSM. Can I see Pokemons when I walk there? No, they are just existing in a software on your mobile phone.

Thanks for not insulting other mappers.
42017-02-08 17:27:04 UTCFortepc I was not mapping "Pokemons" I was tagging the park as also being represented in the Augmented Space, the same as you'd tag the park's website or social pages, or any of the many tags on this part that are a non-physical fact about the park.
52017-02-08 17:30:03 UTCFortepc Look at my edit history, I'm not some token kid trying to vandalize the map. I care about accuracy. I'm seeking to use my local knowledge to map with the greatest accuracy possible. With as much information about the POIs as possible.
62017-02-08 18:29:34 UTCNakaner Hi Fortepc,

adding arg:ingress=portalfarm, arg:pokemongo=pokestopfarm and arg:pokemongo_1=nest does not meet our guidelines about verifiability (also known as the "On The Ground Rule"). Please only add information to OpenStreetMap which everyone can VERIFY ON THE GROUND.

https://wiki...
72017-02-08 18:30:46 UTCNakaner PS Freedom Park has a very strange tagging with dozens of uppercase keys which also is against our rules but that does not make your edits better. The edit which added those uppercase keys might be treated the same way as you.
82017-02-09 17:19:12 UTCFortepc @Nakaner, Yes. I am very familiar with the OSM's on the ground rule. But rule is for mapping things, not adding information to the tags of things. And I am also following all of the rules present on the Pokemon Go blogpost you referred to. I'm improving accuracy of what is on the ground, as well as ...
12017-02-08 11:38:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "Building features=building" on 207 buildings - this is not a defined tag in OSM. What is its purpose?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-08 14:39:52 UTCBgabor Well, seems by mistake - mixed the tag what was used in ID.
12017-02-07 12:25:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't add junction=roundabout to circular streets without knowing the situation on ground. E.g. this one is no roundabout (as described in the german note on it)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25444119

Also, all your tags have a spelling mistake 'jonction' instead of 'junction'
12017-02-07 11:51:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are ~15 ways with a spelling mistake "shouder" instead of "shoulder". Could you have a look?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-07 13:02:57 UTCkre3d Oops. Should be better now. Thanks for pointing it out!
12017-02-05 21:58:44 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier vor einiger Zeit Relationen angelegt, denen das type-Tag fehlt. Kannst du das noch ergänzen?
Gruß, Jan

z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4139718
22017-02-06 08:44:39 UTCNakaner Hallo Jan,

in meinen Augen (als Eisenbahnmapper) sind die Inhalte dieser Relation nicht vor Ort überprüfbar und genügen daher nicht den Anforderungen, die an Objekte gestellt werden, die in OSM eingetragen werden. Mit "Lupe Neuostheim" ist höchstwahrscheinlich eine D...
12017-02-05 21:44:05 UTCmueschel Wurde hier die Ampel tatsächlich wieder abgebaut?
http://osm.org/node/339513244
Vor ein paar Monaten war sie noch da.
12017-02-05 21:30:31 UTCmueschel Hallo Michael,
ist zwar schon lange her, aber: Was befindet sich eigentlich an den "Planeten-"Knoten? Nur ein Name ist so nichtssagend. Eine Informationstafel oder so? Dann könnte man das entsprechend taggen.
Gruß, Jan
12017-02-05 21:28:00 UTCmueschel Hallo,
vorher stammen diese Namen? Informationen aus anderen Karten dürfen in der Regel nicht verwendet werden (Lizenzen!)

Außerdem stimmt das Tagging so nicht: Ein Knoten nur mit einem "name"-Tag beschreibt nicht, um was es sich handelt.

Gruß, Jan
12017-02-05 14:19:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
why did you remove all the good tags again and re-added many tags that don't seem to belong to OSM?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-05 18:29:22 UTCaiwetir The border on the portion of the Winema National Forest in this region http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?#map=16/43.0869/-121.8861 appears to be backwards, it shows landuse forest on the basemap but when editing, the border is on the land around the forest. I reverted to make sure it wasn't somethi...
32017-02-05 18:33:56 UTCmueschel JOSM shows the marker on the wrong side, because there is no way to decide which is the right one by looking at one outer way only. As soon as you download the whole multi-polygon, it switches to the correct side.
There is no "backwards" with respect to the direction of outer ways of mult...
42017-02-05 18:40:08 UTCaiwetir I saw that just now in JOSM, I was obviously editing on the web application. When you look at it on the web application it indeed looks backwards whether there is a backwards or not.
52017-02-05 19:04:39 UTCmueschel The problem is the same for both editors, they just can't decide what is inner and outer without loading the full relation - in case of iD I don't know if this is even possible. When handling huge multi-polygons like this, JOSM is a much better choice. E.g. because you can selectively load the fores...
62017-02-05 19:40:16 UTCaiwetir I could use help, changing all the tags is easy enough but I just took a closer look at the overlapping areas and it's pretty complex. First, large areas of the Gilchrist and Deschutes overlap, then the borders should probably be fixed up so the nodes align to ways or other nodes (that's easy enoug...
72017-02-05 20:25:59 UTCaiwetir As it turns out, much has changed in that region since a land purchase just a few years ago. I'm going to delete the Gilchrist and start anew with new shapefiles.
12017-02-05 14:15:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node? Looks like something went wrong with copy and paste.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-05 12:57:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tagging of this node doesn't seem right.
It is now a sports center, a group home, a foundation and a locality in the same place.
Could you correct this?
Jan
12017-02-04 15:32:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 45 villages with some strange tags, was this a mistake?
E.g.
CODE94X=903035
GLOBAL=0
PRIORITY=NONE
VILLAGE_ID=5826
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4227632087

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-04 15:39:01 UTCkatpatuka hopefully not ;)

The names are from the 11000 villages file mentioned on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Laos/RoadsRiversBoundaries
32017-02-04 15:41:12 UTCmueschel I didn't mean adding the villages, just these tags. They don't look like they belong to OSM and are not used in other places.
42017-02-04 16:52:19 UTCkatpatuka well yes - they are in the original file and I left them as is - comparable to other for osm useless tags like gns:dsg etc. originating from imports
12017-02-04 15:28:44 UTCmueschel Hallo,
hier sind 8 Wege ohne Tags entstanden, kannst du da nochmal nachschauen? z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/385145640

Gruß, Jan
12017-02-04 15:02:17 UTCmueschel Hallo,
hier ist etwas schiefgegangen, die Wege habe alle keinerlei Tags. Kannst du da nochmal drüberschauen?

Gruß, Jan
12017-02-04 12:29:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these two buildings? There is a strange tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114516260
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306543826

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-06 18:31:36 UTCnhdr Oops sorry, it was my mistake. I fixed it already. Thank you)
12017-02-03 13:21:15 UTCmueschel http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29110888
maxspeed 80 oder 90? Da ist ein tag zu viel.

Gruß, Jan
22017-02-03 17:14:23 UTCLinie29 Danke für den Hinweis! Habe auf den richtigen "maxspeed:backward"-Tag korrigiert.
12017-02-03 12:00:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many ways with "Highway" or "Higway" tags - could you correct these? Only 'highway' is a valid key.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-03 11:48:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
can you check the tagging of this way? Looks strange...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470722745

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-31 11:34:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
it's nice to see that you put a lot of effort in mapping destinations. Unfortunately, there is nobody who can use this data, because your tagging style is not documented and used only by you. Why don't you join the common tagging scheme which is successfully used thousands of times all over the...
22017-01-31 18:36:29 UTCyopaseopor The System and the whole scheme is not ready to put it in the wiki so work is in progress. I am mapping complete traffic signs (not only destination traffic signs), but also destinations (which has a clearer scheme) so the actual scheme is getting too little and simple. Traffic signs are being rende...
32017-01-31 18:52:07 UTCmueschel All the tags listed in this project are well-described in the wiki.

Take the node from this changeset as example: I have absolutely no clue why there is a need to list a single destination 15 times on a simple two-lane road like this.
I strongly suggest to ask the communicty for comments before ...
42017-01-31 23:45:32 UTCyopaseopor Ok you win. Please read this. Good night. http://yopaseopor.blogspot.com.es/2017/01/yomapeo-ok-you-win.html
52017-02-03 11:42:01 UTCmueschel "Then hell break loose" - Just because people remind you on the way things should be done in OSM? Have fun putting tags on nodes - nobody will be able to make any use of them as long as you don't write documentation for it.
62017-02-03 19:06:00 UTCyopaseopor Thank you for your help :S
72017-02-05 18:14:57 UTCyopaseopor https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_traffic_signs_tagging
12017-01-17 11:48:12 UTCmueschel Could you please stop adding your personal fantasy about tagging again and again and stop vandalizing OSM data?
22017-01-17 21:43:55 UTCtrial +1, please at least describe what you want to do. Except BS I mean.
32017-02-02 16:59:13 UTCStereo Of course it's partly meant as a joke. At the SotM EU, we came across this strange box, and decided to dedicate it as a monument to RichardF. The RichardF box does exist, and the physical properties are all correct. Someone even slapped a "Surveyed by OSM" sticker on it.

It is an exampl...
42017-02-02 18:12:20 UTCmueschel And this "joke" now renders on every map as a huge pile of Unicode garbage, gives errors because of incorrect units in the height tag and service_times that don't follow the documented tagging rules.
52017-02-02 19:38:24 UTCtrial Not on every map, http://b.tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=20&lat=49.0107&lon=8.38717&layers=B0000000FFFFFF renders it properly. Both renderers are based on the same stack.
But please move your tests to http://www.opengeofiction.net/#map=5/51.500/-0.100 and add the link or the Wiki so that ...
62017-02-02 19:50:58 UTCmueschel The name:fr tag, which is rendered by openstreetmap.fr doesn't contain the Unicode stuff. The default osm.org map shows the Unicode properly, too. But tag is just a collection of Unicode weirdness without any meaning.
72017-02-02 20:03:12 UTCtrial Right. Time to cleanup!
12017-02-02 11:28:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this road?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46039701

The name tag is somehow strange.
22017-02-02 14:33:38 UTCgezginrocker I've corrected it, thanks for your attention.
12017-02-02 07:52:19 UTCeric_ Whitehouse Terrace being part of the north side of Grange Loan, I changed it into name:left as it was originally (i.e. before a contributor changed it into name:South Side). Thanks anyway to have spotted this error.
22017-02-02 09:19:48 UTCmueschel Thanks! I'm sorry for the mistake but I forgot to check the history of the way...
32017-02-21 19:16:18 UTCeric_ No problem (sorry to answer so late).
12017-01-31 12:04:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
there is no need to translate tags like "tourism:fr = chambres d'hôte" - The translation is the same for all tourism = guest_house tags world-wide and can be done automatically by the software showing the data.

Jan
22017-02-01 11:10:02 UTCphilh-591 Thank you for your comment. I'll remove the unnecessary tag.

However, I'll carry on tagging specifically bakers' shops in France as
shop:fr = boulanger, patissier
or
shop:fr = pain, patissier
according to whether the shop displays "Boulanger" or "Pain". This i...
32017-02-01 11:46:17 UTCmueschel Sure, if it provides additional information, an additional tag makes sense.

As you describe a sub-group of bakeries, I would opt for a tagging like this:
shop = bakery
bakery = boulanger
42017-02-04 14:33:33 UTCphilh-591 OK. Actually I'll find out if the French User Group have a recommended practice on tagging for bakeries. If not, I'll put forward the method
shop=bakery; bakery=boulanger
shop=bakery; bakery=dépôt de pain
52017-02-04 16:29:50 UTCtrial http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:shop%3Dbakery
mueschel advice is good. Prevent using multiple keys as long as possible.
So if needed; I would add:
produced_on_site = yes/no
craft=backery.
pastry=yes...
See [OSM-talk-fr]
12017-01-31 15:48:03 UTCmueschel Hallo,
das Tag "maxstay@Mi,Sa = 60" funktioniert so nicht, weil nicht per Software auswertbar.
Besser ist:
maxstay:conditional = 60 @ (We,Sa)
oder noch besser, mit Einschränkung auf den tatsächlichen Zeitraum, oder gilt das 24 Stunden?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-31 15:58:43 UTCKartoGrapHiti Vielen Dank. Ich hatte im Wiki nicht verstanden, wie man es einträgt. Jetzt habe ich versucht, es zu korrigieren: maxstay:conditional=60 @ (We,Sa 07:00-14:00)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45689146#map=19/50.58734/8.67796

Wenn das noch nicht ganz stimmt, bitte gerne korrigieren....
32017-01-31 16:02:12 UTCmueschel Passt. Zeitangaben lassen sich wie üblich hier testen:
http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=We%2CSa%2007%3A00-14%3A00&DATE=1485878400000&lat=48.7769&lon=9.1844&mode=0
12017-01-31 11:57:22 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was meinst du mit "chocker:right"?
Klingt für mich eher nach traffic_calming:forward.

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-31 14:54:42 UTCgeri-oc traffic_calming:*=chocker ist aber nicht im WIKI dokumentiert - deshalb hatte ich chocker=right als ergänzende Information zu gefügt. Ist für mich auch eine einfacher Auswertung, da ich nicht nach allen Varianten suchen muss. Es ist eine kleine Pflanzinsel im Fahrbahnbereich.
Bild un...
32017-01-31 15:13:12 UTCmueschel :forward/:backward und :left/:right sind bei den wenigsten Tags explizit dokumentiert, machen aber generell bei allen Straßeneigenschaften Sinn.

Ob bei einem choker dieser Art ein traffic_calming:right oder traffic_calming:forward besser ist, weiß ich aber auch nicht. Hängt meine...
42017-01-31 15:44:38 UTCgeri-oc Ich würde es so lassen, da es auch mehrfach verwendet wird:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/choker#values

PS: chocker in choker geändert - ist mir an zwei stellen aufgefallen
12017-01-31 12:06:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
found two ways with the tag 'roof:redge' - is this roof:edge or roof:ridge?

Jan
22017-01-31 16:21:00 UTCcarlosz22 Hi.
Ops, my mistake :)
Corrected. Thanks for the advice.
Carlos
12017-01-31 11:55:54 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du hier das Tagging prüfen? 80 = 100 ist ein merkwürdiges Tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469609025
22017-01-31 15:10:35 UTCAmiral Fromage Hallo,
ich werde im nächsten Änderungssatz den Tag entfernen, danke für den Hinweis!
Ebenso werde ich fehlende Langsamfahrsignale ergänzen.
12017-01-31 11:54:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4640145541

313 = 314 is a strange tag.

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-31 13:47:49 UTCBratananio Thanks for helping to correct this mistake.

I've just corrected it.
12017-01-31 11:43:02 UTCmueschel Hallo,
man_made:levels finde ich jetzt nicht so gelungen als neuen Tag - Stockwerke hat so eine Säule ja nicht.

Außerdem gibt es eher keinen Grund hier einen eigenen Namespace mit man_made: zu benutzen - auf was sollte sich height sonst beziehen?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-31 17:29:00 UTCJojo4u Ja die "Stockwerke" waren schon als building unpassend und habe ich jetzt entfernt. Geblieben ist nur man_made:part=yes.
12017-01-30 11:27:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the key "noezit" on several ways. Could you correct the spelling and move the tag to the last node of the way? (noexit is usually not put on the whole way, but just on the last unconnected node)
22017-01-31 17:16:23 UTCpaulbe done !
12017-01-30 09:44:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you define these two tags differently?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3213092963
opening_hours_비수기=AM 09:00 ~ AM 12:00
opening_hours_성수기=AM 08:00 ~ AM 1:00 (성수기)

What does '비수기' mean? Tags must be in English, otherwise they can not be understood by softw...
12017-01-30 09:41:39 UTCmueschel Hallo,
diese beiden Tags passsen nicht zum parking:lane-Schema. Kannst du da nochmal nachschauen?
parking:left:free = *
parking:right:residents = *
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane

Gruß, Jan
12017-01-27 11:48:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put several strange tags on these objects, like these:
heightBe_1 =m
heightBelo =3
numberOfFl =0
numberOf_1 =1

Could you convert them to well-defined tags?
Jan
22017-01-27 12:03:27 UTCtaborda Fixed :)
32017-01-30 09:34:29 UTCmueschel Looks like your fix wasn't uploaded correctly, the tags are still there.
12017-01-30 09:01:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
The hotel you added is already present in OSM:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1535788924
I deleted your new node because objects should be mapped only once.
12017-01-29 22:19:55 UTCmueschel Hallo,
aus welcher Quelle stammen diese Gebäudeumrisse? Hast du sichergestellt, dass die Lizenz dafür mit OSM / ODbL kompatibel ist?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-30 11:18:25 UTCstvmz backes Hallo,
ich bin Mitarbeiterin des Bauamts der Stadt Mainz. Die Stadt Mainz hat sich entschlossen, in die Pflege der Hausnummern und Gebäude in OSM einzusteigen. Die Gebäudeumrisse stammen aus eigenen Daten der Bauakte, sowie eigenen Luftbildern. Die Stadt Mainz prüft zur Zeit die Frei...
32017-01-30 12:12:04 UTCPolarbear Hallo stvmz backes, das ist ja wunderbar, dass ihr da auch selbst aktiv werdet. Die Nutzungsberechtigung eurer Daten und die Art des Zugangs müsste aber dokumentiert werden, und es muss erkennbar sein, dass der Erteiler der Erlaubnis dazu auch berechtigt ist. Ich empfehle hierzu den Kontakt zu ...
12017-01-29 14:53:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please explain the edits you made? Most of the keys you used are not defined and used nowhere else:
bibliographicCitation =ISSN 1927-0488 E-ISSN 1927-0496
nameAccordingTo = http://www.tropicos.org/Name/1701853
plot \tPlotLagoas15
references =http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v2n3p115...
22017-01-29 18:39:29 UTCnaoliv Markus, talvez você queira utilizar as tags corretas para representar as informações?
Por exemplo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:genus e/ou https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species e/ou https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:taxon
Se precisar de alguma ajuda pa...
12017-01-29 14:37:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469031630

24 = service looks like a mistake and I think the house number is wrong.

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-29 14:34:01 UTCmueschel Was soll uns das Tag "bug concat dup Road =yes" sagen?
22017-01-30 09:45:10 UTCkräckel C&P versehen
falscher Wert, ist berichtigt
Grüße & Danke
12017-01-28 16:56:05 UTCmueschel Hi Chris,
don't forget about the tag traffic_signals:direction on intersections like this with individually mapped traffic lights.
Jan
12017-01-28 16:51:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please note that all keys you use to identify an object needs to be in English - everything else is not understood by the software and is not shown on maps. Have a look to the wiki ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org ) to find the common tags.

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-27 11:56:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this way? If it is a road, please add a highway-Tag.
What is the meaning of the tag "Limpieza Lunes =equipo 1"?

Jan
12017-01-27 11:54:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put two uncommon tags on this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4629999312
maxspeed:2:forward =20
side =right

Could you change them to well-defined tags so that the information can be understood by software?

Jan
12017-01-27 11:50:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the key "name:Ko_rm" on many objects - the correct spelling is "name:ko_rm". I just fixed that.

Jan
12017-01-27 11:41:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several buildings on top of already existing ones. Could you have a look and correct these mistakes?
Additionally, you added many tags which have no meaning in OSM - only well-defined tags as described in the Wiki can be used. Examples:
Building \tYes
Capacity \t1000
Condtition \t...
12017-01-26 12:02:13 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du bei den alten Namen und Datumsangaben mit dem richtigen Format arbeiten? z.B. 1900-01-01--2000-12-31
Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Date_namespace
Sonst sind die Daten leider ziemlich nutzlos.
Gruß, Jan
22017-01-26 12:09:31 UTCjengelh Gut zu wissen! Werde ich dann noch anpassen, danke.
12017-01-25 12:31:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
may I point you to this proposal for mapping lane connections?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/transit
It's 'just' a proposal, but already used in some places.
Cheers, Jan
12017-01-25 12:24:02 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier sehr viele Häuser mit dem Tag "Wirling = 8" hochgeladen, kannst du das korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-25 15:13:00 UTCgerhard81 Hallo Jan! Danke ans aufmerksam machen. Ich kümmere mich die Tage darum.
Grüße Gerhard
12017-01-25 12:19:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this parking lot?
This tag is strange: capacity:disabledy = street_lamp
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467673707

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-25 12:15:06 UTCmueschel There are again 1500++ buildings with wrong tags. Could you fix the tagging before uploading to OSM? There is just no need to distribute this information to hundreds of users and then changing it a few days later.

addr_num
addr_stree
shrt

Btw, the source given in your changeset is wrong.
22017-01-25 23:59:32 UTCAndrew Matheny Fixed. These are fields that are dropped/mapped to OSM tags before import, but it sometimes doesn't happen with the repetitive process :)
12017-01-24 22:06:06 UTCmueschel Bitte nicht blind "junction = roundabout" an jede kreisförmige Straße schreiben. Wendehämmer sind keine Kreisel.
22017-01-24 22:57:58 UTCLothar Schiborr_1 Stimmt, war Blödsinn. Ist zwar eine Wendestelle, gebaut wie
mini_roundabout. Was ist richtig.
Wendestelle oder Minikreisel
32017-01-24 23:35:15 UTCmueschel Wenn keine Schilder stehen, ist es weder ein roundabout noch ein mini-roundabout. Entweder ein node mit highway=turning_loop oder einfach eine ringförmige Straße - kreisförmig würde ich sie allerdings in der Regel eher nicht machen, mehr wie ein Tropfen oder ein "P" ge...
42017-01-25 12:19:02 UTCLothar Schiborr_1 Hier würde ich ihn als Kreis lassen wie er ist, bildet die Wirklichkeit ab
12017-01-24 22:10:38 UTCmueschel Hallo,
geht dieser Kreisel wirklich in die falsche Richtung?
http://osm.org/node/254598207

Jan
22017-01-24 22:22:44 UTCblauer_elefant k.A.; ich habe auf den bing-Luftbildern gesehen, dass dort ein Minikreisel ist und habe in JOSM die entsprechende Vorlage genutzt ohne darauf zu achten, ob die eine Richtung hat/angibt. Ich könnte das demnächst prüfen.
--jens
32017-01-24 22:35:39 UTCmueschel Dann lösche ich das mal, da hast du wahrscheinlich aus Versehen etwas ausgewählt. Bei "normalen" Kreiseln ist die Angabe ja überflüssig.
42017-01-24 22:41:51 UTCblauer_elefant danke. ich achte beim nächsten Mal drauf
12017-01-24 22:32:37 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was spricht denn gegen highway=preproposed? Das ist das übliche Tag für eine Straße in diesem Planungsstand.
Gruß, Jan
22017-01-25 05:52:00 UTCGerdP Hallo Jan,

siehe diese CS-Diskussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/7372351#map=11/49.8861/9.7954
12017-01-24 11:29:21 UTCmueschel Hallo,
das Tagging kommt mir falsch vor.
- Die Straße ist immer motor_vehicle=private, außer jetzt sind wegen der Baustelle Lieferfahrzeuge erlaubt.
- Das Tag "temporary = date_on=2017-01-14" gibt es nicht, Zeiten werden mittels der conditional-Syntax angegeben.
- Warum is...
22017-01-26 08:37:42 UTCvillage Hm, ich weiß nicht, ob du die Situation vor Ort gesehen hast: Die Straße ist vorhanden, aber auf diesem Teil komplett gesperrt, der Fußweg auf der rechten Seite gar nicht mehr vorhanden - und dient als Baustellenzufahrt.
Wenn da jetzt wirklich gebaut wird, dauert das bestimmt 1&fr...
12017-01-24 09:58:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 25 objects with the key "brrier" in your edits, would you mind correcting that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-24 10:14:57 UTCSK53 Fixed: copying tags from object to object has it's issues :-)
12017-01-24 09:57:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are some new "buildlings" added by you:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/lsV
22017-01-24 18:24:20 UTCnjsurf1813 mueschel,

Indeed they have. I'd made a circular building in josm with the 'buildlings' tag and haven't been too careful to make sure that future not-made-with-building-tool buildings are not accidentally tagged the same I suppose.Thanks for looking out. I will fix and make sure I don't make the m...
12017-01-22 18:31:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
SUR=GRO looks like a mistake
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467476183

Jan
22017-01-22 19:17:11 UTCLuuuddooo Thanks a lot Jan for noticing this mistake ! I probably thought JOSM would autocomplete to surface=ground but it couldn't work because of CAPS LOCK...
12017-01-21 20:13:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this relation?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6894134
I don't understand the key "-- = 7"

Jan
12017-01-21 20:10:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
there is a spelling mistake in the fcc key on this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1785267661
Could you check and correct it?
22017-01-24 19:55:10 UTCmicahcochran I have corrected the misspelled tag. Thanks!
12017-01-21 20:06:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some ref-Tags with varying spelling. Could you use a consistent tag?
ref:eUR27
ref:eur27
ref:eEUR27
REF:EUR27
ref:eUnis
REF:EUNIS
Common practice seems to be ref:EUNIS and ref:EUR27
22017-01-21 21:19:55 UTCfrancoLI First I apologize for my bad English. I'm using google translator.
I thought that tags were not case sensitive.
I will try to correct.
the difference between EUR 27 and EUNIS is how subtle. EUR27 refer basically to the areas of Applied directives Habitat, while EUNIS is more general and sometimes...
12017-01-21 20:02:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many ways with strange tags, like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467016766

Could you have a look and correct these?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-22 05:21:10 UTCdnwilson Thanks for letting me know I have fixed it.
It was caused by cut and past going very wrong.
12017-01-21 19:56:53 UTCmueschel Here is another new way with strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466974600

22017-01-21 20:21:31 UTCpiligab Hi Mueschel.
I proceeded to change the tags. Thanks for your feedback.
Regards.
12017-01-21 18:08:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found tags like
sidewalk hazard
travel hazard
trip hazard
Sidewalkhazards
on several objects.
This might be a good description of something,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look to the wiki about common
tags.

Jan
12017-01-21 13:45:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found this way with strange tags. Could you correct this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467242504

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-21 15:48:36 UTCtaborda Hi. Sorry. I have made a mistake. I Will solve it. Thanks.
12017-01-21 13:31:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
wo kommen den diese ganzen Informationen her? Von Bing, wie du angibst, sicher nicht.

Außerdem ist beim Tagging einiges schiefgelaufen.
generator:output:electricity=yes/kWh - da macht der Wert keinen Sinn
generator: location - da gehört kein Leerzeichen rein
Und alle Knoten de...
22017-01-21 14:31:27 UTCDD1GJ Zudem sind die Häuser jetzt doppelt vorhanden. Daher habe ich alles zurückgesetzt
32017-01-26 09:31:20 UTCNakaner @DD1GJ @mueschel siehe meinen Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45504461
12017-01-20 22:45:53 UTCmueschel Bitte fügen nicht blind "junction = roundabout" an Wege an, nur weil Osmose eine Warnung anzeigt. Ein roundabout muss immer mit einem entsprechenden blauen Schild ausgestattet sein, das ist bei Wendeplätzen wie diesem sicher nicht der Fall.
22017-01-20 22:50:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't add "junction = roundabout" to places like this. This tag is only used in case there are the corresponding traffic signs and rules in place.
32017-01-29 18:43:50 UTCvenerdi I apologize for the error. I deduced the rules of precedence from aerial photos and I could not check for traffic signal. Thanks for your correction. In the case of closed lines that are reported as errors by Osmose it would probably be better to divide them into two parts to avoid the problem.
12017-01-20 22:28:51 UTCmueschel Hallo,
dein mapping von einfachen Kreuzungen mit sehr vielen einzelnen Wegen entspricht nicht der gängen Praxis und führt zu vielen Problemen, z.B. an dieser Kreuzung:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45137545#map=19/50.46256/8.37944
Da stimmen in vielen Fällen die jetzt not...
12017-01-20 22:13:30 UTCmueschel Hallo,
bei deinen Edits von Waldwegen sind hier in der Gegend sehr viele "überlappende Wege" entstanden. D.h. zwei Wege, die auf einem ganzen Stück übereinander liegen. Würdest du da nochmal einen Blick drauf werfen?

http://keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12&l...
12017-01-19 11:39:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
this valley has a strange tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465942245
"Val Désél = Senté de la Gesa"
Is this the name?

Jan
22017-01-19 12:22:46 UTCCarlo Folini Sorry, my fault! It should be a 'name' tag.
Thanks for pointing me to this.

Can I ask you how do you discovered it?

Ciao Carlo
32017-01-19 12:51:08 UTCmueschel I wrote a small script that shows all the new keys appearing in the database:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
12017-01-18 20:25:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

You added many objects with tags like
area =yes
name =lote2

You may see that these are not shown on the map - all objects need a tag describing what they are, for example building=yes or amenity=hospital. Have a look to the OSM Wiki to find these tags.

Let me know if ...
12017-01-18 20:20:13 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier ein merkwürdiges Tag vergeben, kannst du das kontrollieren?
Weissenegg =visit=from_outside

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1546774
22017-01-18 20:47:38 UTCnebulon42 Da ist definitiv was schiefgegangen, danke für den Hinweis.
32017-01-18 20:50:06 UTCnebulon42 Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45281656.
12017-01-18 14:19:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
Please watch out for the correct spelling of keys - i corrected several spelling mistakes in the last days, but I don't know if I found all of them.

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-18 21:20:03 UTCHairyCoo Sorry, I typed too fast. I will pay more attention in the future! HairyCoo
12017-01-17 09:53:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these buildings have the key 'shrt' - is this a mistake during import? It's not used in any other place.

Jan
22017-01-17 16:16:58 UTCAndrew Matheny Jan-

Yep, this is an extra tag I bring in during the import to be able to categorize buildings that overlap multiple land uses. I've removed them from the buildings.

Thanks!

Andrew
12017-01-16 20:24:49 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du bei den Edits nochmal nach der Schreibweise schauen? Ein paar Fehler habe ich korrigiert, weiß aber nicht, ob es alle waren.
Beispiele:
lames:backwards
lanes:backwards
lanes:turn = through;left;through

Beim letzten musst du nochmal ran, da weiß ich nicht was der ...
22017-01-25 21:13:35 UTCLokalfuerst Hallo mueschel, kann vermutlich nur ueber dieses Textfenster antworten.. Das Taggen mit lanes habe ich noch nicht so oft gemacht. Habe da einen Syntax-Fehler gemacht; "|" und ";" nicht richtig eingesetzt. Habe das korritiert. Danke fuer den Hinweis und viele Grüsse Lokalfuer...
12017-01-16 20:11:38 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Tagging schauen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464578456
Ich kann es leider nicht korrigieren, weil ich nicht weiß welche Art von Lift es ist:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aerialway

Gruß, Jan
12017-01-16 11:39:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of all those tags you used in various changesets?

mikrodistrict
mikrodistriot
microdiscript
microdistrct
microdistrict

OSM can only be useful if only well-defined keys are used. Please have a look in the wiki to find an appropriate key.

Jan
12017-01-15 11:58:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
Pizza Lazio has got two opening_hour tags, contradicting each other. Could you check this?
22017-01-15 12:51:47 UTCHjart Fixed according to website
12017-01-13 13:34:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465259458

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-13 14:37:44 UTCsamely Hi Jan,
Can you be more specific, please? I checked it out, however, I didn't find anything special.

Regards,
Eliane
32017-01-13 14:39:35 UTCmueschel The way has the tag "170 south=Andover Lane"
42017-01-13 14:45:09 UTCsamely I was reviewing the big street, thanks for pointing this out, I've already fixed it.
12017-01-13 14:09:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4604550676

"pl = h"


Cheers, Jan
12017-01-13 13:28:44 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was heißt denn "car service = Breakdown"? Das Tag ist eine Neuerfindung.

Gruß, Jan
12017-01-13 12:10:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the spelling of tags? I found 73 ways with the tag "intermitant" which should be "intermittent".

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-13 09:42:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these buildings have many strange tags that don't belong to OSM

FEATURE_TY=2000
Join_Count=1
ParcelJoin=1
PointJoin=1
ResCom=R
SHAPE_Area=2020.05568017
TARGET_FID=119888
addr_num=1831
addr_stree=Huntingdon Avenue
shrt=SFH

Could you clea...
22017-01-13 15:24:35 UTCAndrew Matheny Jan-

Good catch! Updated to remove them (and correct the address tags where needed).

Thanks!
12017-01-12 11:44:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are 141 nodes with tags like these that do not belong into the OSM database:
COORD_X \t727218
COORD_Y \t4375519
ID \t152906
NUMERO \t63

Could you correct this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-12 12:09:19 UTCmiguel_cc Hi!!

Yesterday I began todo use foro first time the JOSM editor, so I had some problems with the tags.

Todas I'm going yo correct that mistakes.

Thank you for your comment.

miguel_cc
12017-01-12 11:21:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you review the tagging of this area? I don't know what you wanted to tag so I can't fix it.

Jan
22017-01-12 13:17:17 UTCmaldav I wanted to tag an area as an urban farm but to show comment on the use and user. It was obviously a make to delineate the area with a line.
I have now drawn an area and described it as landuse=farm, and added the comments with a spot tag. Long term I want to use coloured tags for Food Security...
12017-01-12 10:07:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging? This tag looks weird:
31/5=Аламедин-1 микрорайон
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391685946

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-11 11:44:16 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier leider die Straßenverbindung gekappt - gab es an der Kreuzung eine Änderung, die du mappen wolltest, oder ist das nur ein Versehen?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-11 12:21:54 UTCMinitoffel Hallo Jan, bisher hat die Lauterbadstraße erst bei Nummer 10 begonnen. Die Straßburger Straße erst bei Nummer 7. Die Straßburger Straße beginnt aber schon da, wo sie jetzt eingezeichnet ist, die Lauterbadstraße beginnt ebenfalls am Promenadeplatz. Ich habe beide S...
32017-01-11 12:27:29 UTCmueschel Zoom auf der Karte ganz weit rein und drücke zur Sicherheit F5, damit alle Kacheln neu geladen werden. Du hast den zentralen Knoten auf der Kreuzung gelöscht, damit sind die Straßen jetzt nicht mehr verbunden.

Ich kann das heute abend wieder korrigieren. Am besten macht man da ein...
42017-01-11 12:49:42 UTCMinitoffel Ah o.k. verstehe. Das wollte ich nicht, sorry. Aber kannst Du es so machen, dass die Straßburger Straße und die Lauterbadstraße am Knotenpunkt beginnen? Und könntest Du bitte den Promenadeplatz bestehen lassen? Wenn Du einen Revert machst, ist das alles wieder weg, und das w&a...
52017-01-11 19:34:05 UTCmueschel So, die Kreuzung stimmt wieder.
Das leisure=common habe ich dem Platz abgenommen und auf place=locality geändert.

Die Loßburger geht jetzt natürlich bis in die Mitte der Kreuzung, das ist aber so üblich. Da Straßen ja nur Linien sind in OSM gibt es da immer leichte Abs...
62017-01-11 21:59:54 UTCMinitoffel Super, so gehen alle Straßen bis zum Knotenpunkt. Ich bitte nochmals um Entschuldigung, ich wusste nicht, dass ich was rauslösche. Im April beginnen die Bauarbeiten für den Kreisel auf dem Promenadeplatz, dann wird es nochmal irgendwann eine Änderung geben. Viele Grüß...
12017-01-11 11:49:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
looks like you wanted to tag some opening_hours (note the spelling!) here, but the tag looks strange:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365953558

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-11 18:40:08 UTCNiels Elgaard Larsen There was an access tag saying "only wednesdays" in Danish. I thought opening_hours would be more appropriate. I fixed the typo now.
32017-01-11 18:45:05 UTCmueschel Alright. The shortest opening_hours value I ever saw ;-)
12017-01-11 11:31:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the ':name' tag of this forest? Looks like you wanted to use another key there.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222070183
22017-01-11 11:40:18 UTCSK53 Thanks it needed a source:name
12017-01-11 10:24:42 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du diesen Key hier korrigieren?
http://osm.org/node/4596238593
"direction_waet"

Gruß, Jan
12017-01-11 10:21:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 219 hydrants with the key 'posi', which is not used in any other place.
I think that a tag like this would be more appropriate and easier to understand by others:
description = position: sidewalk

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-11 11:10:43 UTCjendrusk Hi,
Sorry - my mistake - it should be fire_hydrant:position. I'll fix it :)
Cheers
12017-01-10 11:37:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
http://osm.org/relation/2442510
could you check / fix the tag "åå = BE", looks strange.

Jan
22017-01-10 11:43:28 UTCescada Fixed.
thanks for letting me know
12017-01-10 11:32:10 UTCmueschel Hallo,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464103122
Der Key 'Backhaus" macht so wenig Sinn,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbakehouse
22017-01-10 12:20:35 UTCLothar Schiborr_1 Danke,
erledigt
12017-01-10 11:26:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't put the names of people in the OSM database. This is private information and does not belong into a public map.

Jan
12017-01-10 11:23:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this bridge?
"bridge:re`" looks like a mistake.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464346005

Jan
12017-01-10 10:50:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 195 buildings in your changesets with a spelling mistake:
"buildling=yes"
Could you have a look and correct these?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/l9U

Jan
22017-01-13 13:29:33 UTCnjsurf1813 Jan!
Thanks for finding this.
Getting this fixed right away.
- Max
12016-11-09 12:31:28 UTCmueschel Hi & welcome to OSM!

On several of the objects you added, I saw tags like "Justice Hall = yes" or "Nasugbu Auditorium/Evacuation Center = yes". These tags can not be understood by software and should be changed to something else.
E.g. if it is the name of the object, put ...
22017-01-10 02:22:52 UTCpayan yes ineed help,from the time i upload some added buildings,and close the josm.after i opened some bulidings and structure i uploaded was missing but in open street map isaw it
32017-01-10 09:21:19 UTCmueschel What exactly is missing? Please give some examples.
12017-01-09 10:06:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several tracks with an "acces" tag - "access" is written with two 's'. Could you check this?
Btw, is all access private? E.g. you are not allowed to enter by foot?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-09 13:01:51 UTCFrédéric Gutkin Hello Jan,

Sorry for the "acces" in place of "access" :P ! Thank you for your comment. I corrected it...
In fact, I went on place (Freux, Bougnimont, Séviscourt...) about one month ago. It's a large private area of fishing and a prohibition panel (also for pedestrians...
32017-01-09 13:15:41 UTCmueschel Alright then. I just asked because many people use 'access' when they actually mean 'vehicle'.
12017-01-09 11:23:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
found the key "name:end_date" on two nodes - this tag is not used in other places. You could use name:DATE instead, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Date_namespace

Jan
22017-01-09 19:13:23 UTCjptolosa87 Thanks for the info: I've fixed them.
12017-01-09 11:16:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this way?
"namep = County Route 16/8"
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15520161

Jan
22017-01-10 16:51:51 UTCmaxerickson Fixed it. 'namep' was a typo from switching name_1 and name. The address I added used the value in name so I assumed it was the main value but didn't want to delete the other value (counties do often have a secondary system of labeling roads but it would need a survey to know for sure if anything is...
12017-01-08 13:36:47 UTCmueschel Halo,
was heißt denn "Toyota = i-Road" an vielen Häusern hier?
Das "description" tag halte ich auch für etwas merkwürdig. Warum nicht building = residential oder house?

Gruß, Jan
12017-01-08 13:30:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
please note that all tags have to be in English, as documented in the wiki.
For example this node:
https://osm.org/node/4592645240
should have the tag shop = hairdresser

Could you review your edits and change the tagging?

Cheers, Jan


12017-01-08 13:03:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "спорткомплекс" here - tags should always be in English. Did you mean leisure = sports_centre?

Jan
12017-01-08 12:36:00 UTCmueschel Here are at least two more ways with strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463735984
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463734477

Jan
22017-01-10 02:32:26 UTCpiligab Hi Mueschel,
I am sorry.
Thank you for bringing this to my notice. What you have mentioned is right. Hence, I have corrected the tag of my changeset. Thanks for your feedback.
Regards.
12017-01-08 10:05:06 UTCPT-53 Hallo mueschel,
nach dem Verschieben der Note durch Dich zeigt keep right jetzt diese Fehlermeldung an:
http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=81138106&zoom=17&lat=47.95291&lon=9.32812&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C20&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
Erledigt Du das ?
Gr&...
22017-01-08 12:26:08 UTCmueschel Doppelter Node ist entfernt. Das lag aber nicht an meinem Umtagging, die Nodes lagen vorher schon übereinander - und ob dieser Node an dieser Stelle überhaupt Sinn macht weiß ich nicht, die Form der Wasserfläche ist ja etwas ungewöhnlich.
12017-01-07 13:58:58 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du hier nochmal drüberschauen?
- Adress-Nodes sollten nicht das Tag building=yes haben wenn sie innerhalb eines Gebäudes liegen
- Entweder soll das Gebäude die Adressinformationen haben, oder es gibt einen Adress-Node, aber nicht beides gleichzeitig (und das teilweise...
12017-01-06 11:52:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tags you put on the roads do not fully match your description: If you want to allow busses _only_, you also have to close the road to other traffic, e.g. by an additional
motor_vehicle:backward:conditional = no @ 06:00 - 22:00.

Let me know if you need help!
Jan
22017-01-06 12:07:43 UTCAmZaf Thanks for your attention. I added the motor_vehicle restriction as a default value when the conditional restriction does not apply, i.e. after 10 p.m. This means that the backward lane is open to all traffic after 10 p.m.
OSM documentation referenced below says that a conditional restriction is ...
32017-01-06 12:13:03 UTCmueschel This applies only if it's the same key, e.g. vehicle and vehicle:conditional.

A key like 'bus' doesn't make any assumptions on other type of traffic. I'd suggest:

motor_vehicle = no #closed for the major part of the day
motor_vehicle:conditional = yes @ 22:00 - 06:00 #allowed 22 - 06
bus ...
42017-01-06 12:16:39 UTCAmZaf I'll make the relevant changes. Thanks you.
12017-01-06 11:38:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
you created four roads with very strange tags, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463734354

Could you have a look & fix it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-06 13:28:08 UTCpiligab Hi Mueschel,

Thank you for bringing this to my notice. What you have mentioned is right. Hence, I have corrected the tag of my changeset. Thanks for your feedback.
Regards.
12017-01-06 10:29:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 240 nodes with all foreign tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4590931216

Looks like something went wrong there. Please don't forget to name the source of your data and check if licenses are compatible.

Jan
12017-01-05 11:58:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this parking?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463454965

start_hours and end_hours are no common tags. The right tag could "opening_hours" or "maxstay_conditional"

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-05 09:45:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tags on this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4582450961
Looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-06 10:26:51 UTCPeter_Klofutar_import Deleted, thanks.

Regards, Peter
12017-01-05 09:41:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't put tags like this
Catandaan HighSchool=yes
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463579172

The other tags like amenity and name already describe the object well enough. Non-standard tags like "Catandaan HighSchool" don't help OSM because there is no software that can int...
12017-01-04 22:03:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
are you sure this way exists or did you just trace it according to Bing images? I thought it had been removed.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419945835
22017-01-05 01:04:22 UTCOpk Was not traced, I definitely walked along it and can actually remember it. tracktype = 4 is perhaps generous, especially for the Southern end. Entrances were also less clear but there was a very distinct path and I know I passed a couple of other people along it. When you say that you thought it had...
12016-05-02 17:06:07 UTCDD1GJ Hallo UI2015, wie hast Du die ganzen Koordinaten ermittelt bzw.welche Quelle hast Du verwendet?
22016-05-04 06:59:39 UTCUI2015 Hallo DD1GJ, die Koordinaten und Adressen, welche ich hinzugefügt habe, stammen aus einer Liste des örtlichen Wasserversorgers. Er hat eine Liste der Wasserzähler in allen Haushalten in Künzell und hier die zugehörige Adressen und Koordinaten. Diese Adressen habe ich fü...
32016-05-04 07:51:10 UTCDD1GJ Danke für die Auskunft. Die Details werden gerade auf dem direkten Weg geklärt.
42016-05-16 07:11:05 UTCnafl Hallo,

ich korrigiere gerade Fehler die mir KeepRight meldet.
Leider sind bei den ganzen Häusern die Adressen nochmal in einem zusätzlichen Punkt innerhalb der Gebäude eingetragen.
Und diese Punkte sind ebenfalls als Gebäude gekennzeichnet (was sie ja nicht sind)
Man kö...
52016-05-16 10:01:21 UTCDD1GJ Hallo NAFL,

die Rechtmäßigkeit der Datenherkunft wird gerade geklärt. Es kann sein, dass alle Änderungen von UI2015 zurückgesetzt werden müssen.
62016-10-15 19:50:37 UTCmueschel Hat sich hier inzwischen etwas ergeben?
72016-10-15 20:01:09 UTCDD1GJ Der örtliche Wasserversorger ist fast damit fertig, die Hauskoordinaten durch die Ableser erfassen zu lassen, so dass sie der Teilnehmervereinbarung entsprechen. Vermutlich im November wird dann die Wiki-Seite zur Diskussion eines dann fachgerechten Imports erstellt werden.
82016-12-23 13:55:09 UTCsurveyor54 Ich habe hier einmal etwas recherchiert.
Der Wasserversorger hat die Daten höchstwahrscheinlich von hier.
https://hvbg.hessen.de/irj/HVBG_Internet?cid=86659dc09ae74e0e83190c96a152a981
Diese Koordinaten scheinen Deckungsgleich mit den importierten zu sein. Ich hatte die Möglichkeit dies...
92017-01-01 17:38:56 UTCmueschel Das klingt für mich, als sollte hier nun zuerst einmal ein Revert erfolgen?
102017-01-02 13:10:02 UTCDD1GJ Hallo, ich habe diese Adressen sowie die aus vorausgegangenen Changesets gelöscht. Es war etwas Eile geboten, weil ein anderer User begonnen hatte, die Hausnummern auf associated streets Relationen umzustellen.
112017-01-04 21:55:16 UTCmueschel Ist geklärt, wie die restlichen Adressen, z.B. in Engelhelms entstanden sind?
www.openstreetmap.org/node/3904954564/history
12017-01-04 13:06:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
please stop importing data until you have fixed the spelling mistake!
See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44859230

Btw, is the license of this data source compatible with OSM?

Jan
12017-01-04 13:03:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you created 73 objects with only foreign tags. Could you correct this?
E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463512916

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-04 18:13:20 UTCgeow Hi Giomieres and a warm welcome to OpenStreetMap. It appears that you've imported a significant number of hydrographic features (488 ways with 7244 nodes).

1. As mentioned above by "mueschel" you haven't used the the proper tags for waterways, which are defined in our wiki
http://wiki...
12017-01-03 12:00:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check your tagging? Tags should be in english and follow common tagging rules documented in the wiki.
E.g. here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4583510317
Naprawa=spierdolonego
chodnika=wraz
przy=Ślężnej
z=ddr

Jan
22017-01-14 23:51:04 UTCmaraf24 You bet he should, but he won't as he never do.
12017-01-03 10:26:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check these edits? There are 446 objects with the tag "addre:country" which should be "addr:country"

Jan
12017-01-02 12:57:07 UTCmueschel Why did you delete this hotel? Please use changeset comments!
12017-01-02 12:15:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this object? It has two contradicting wall tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129771941

Jan
12017-01-01 18:26:50 UTCmueschel Hallo,
hier ist beim Erstellen der Multipolygone einiges schief gegangen. Die Wege selbst dürfen keine Tags mehr haben, z.B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456955625

Siehe auch:
http://keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=50.62574&lon=10.13123&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30&...
12017-01-01 14:54:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw several tags with Cyrillic letters in your edits. Could you have a look and change them to common, English tags? Otherwise they are not useful for OSM.
I was able to correct some, but not all of them.

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-12 17:34:27 UTCmavl This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
12017-01-01 14:43:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the tags time and time_1 on this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4580887377

Maybe you can use a tag like "opening_hours" instead?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-01 22:58:55 UTCgeoaria Hi
Thanks for your hints .
.In the hours for half an hour opens.
Clock insertion, time of prayer.
I wish,  There is also an option for prayer times. Since its opening, it depends on the sunrise and sunset.

I think I should correct.
:)
12017-01-01 14:42:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
this building has the tag "hous = water" which seems strange. Could you clarify what it is supposed to be?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461786425

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-01 14:58:33 UTCSuffolkNY Jan,

Sorry, that's a mistake. It should be building=house (this is not a garage).

Michael
32017-01-01 21:22:29 UTCNorthfork I corrected it and checked other buildings around Jamesport for the tag "hous=water". It was the only building.
12017-01-01 13:38:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
please indicate the source of this information. Is the sources license compatible with ODbL?

Jan
12016-12-31 15:29:23 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was heißt denn
access = block
blocktype = fence
Das sind keine Tags die anderswo verwendet werden. Meinst du access=no, barrier=fence?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-01 16:43:19 UTCturbojoe Hey Jan, mehr Auswahl hatte das genutzte Tool nicht angeboten, und zum nacharbeiten bin ich letzte Woche nicht gekommen.
Ist aktualisiert.
12016-12-31 15:20:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the tag "food_prone = yes"? You used it several times, but it is not used any where else.

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-31 16:02:56 UTCLuuuddooo Hi Jan, thanks a lot for your remark, it's a typo, I wanted to set http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flood_prone, I'll correct that.
Cheers, Ludo.
12016-12-31 14:30:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
The tag 'pl:Sieruciowce =administrative' looks like a mistake.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31519348

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-31 16:05:30 UTCWładysław Komorek Fixed.
12016-12-31 14:26:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
this relation and several others have many tags that look like they don't belong to OSM. Could you check that?

ACRES \t14489.62
EASE_OPEN \tOpen
EASE_STATU \tOpen to All Use
OBJECTID \t8844
PROP_NAME \tNAVARINO WILDLIFE AREA
RE_INFO_UR \thttp://dnr.wi.gov/topic/lands/WildlifeAreas/navar...
22016-12-31 17:41:17 UTCSkybunny Fixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44811227 to use OSM compliant tags in all cases. My apologies.

Best,
12016-12-31 14:23:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
your source tags have ticks (') in the key which shouldn't be there. Could you fix this? Actually, there is no need to put these tags, the information is already in the source tag of the changeset itself.

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-31 15:44:51 UTCAleks-Berlin I have fixed it now. I also have fixed some others some days ago. Alex
12016-12-31 14:15:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
the two tags
barrier:gate \tyes
barrier:gate:access \tno
are not used in any other place. Could you describe the barrier and who can get through in words?

Jan
22016-12-31 15:44:25 UTClokejul The barrier is a fence across the entire 3m width of the path. one end of the fence is a cycle barrier. The rest of the fence is locked chain-link gate.

I will retry with a different set of tags.
12016-12-31 14:11:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node? Something went wrong with the tagging:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4577832566

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-31 14:37:35 UTCPab09 Fixed, thanks.
12016-12-31 14:01:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du das Tagging nochmal überprüfen?
In einigen Keys (z.B. railway:signal:typ) schreibst du type ohne e (zusammen mindestens 16 Mal) und teilweise auch mit einem Großbuchstaben am Anfang.

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-01 10:57:05 UTCSuerlaenner Hallo und frohes neues Jahr! Ich habe schon gemerkt das das Tagging in Arnsberg, Bf nicht erfolgreich war. In Neheim-Hüsten hat es schon besser funktioniert. Ich ändere es die Tage nochmal ab.
Schönen Gruß
Christopher
12016-12-31 13:55:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this area? Keys must be in English and only keys described in the wiki should be used.

Cheers, Jan
12016-12-31 13:51:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
I don't really understand the tagging of these objects, could you explain?
barrier = block - Barriers should be part of a way, some of these are not.
building:colurs = concrete - there is no building tagged, and 'concrete' is not a colour
colour = concrete - 'concrete' is not a col...
12016-12-31 13:33:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
may I ask for the source of data of all these hotels? There are many issues with this data:

- most hotels I checked already exist in the OSM database
- you deleted some existing hotels
- the tagging of the new nodes is wrong. Tags like addr:tourism, addr:phone or addr:name do not exist.
12016-12-29 21:29:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way uses some uncommon tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462120108
cyclestreet = yes
cycleway = cyclestreet

Did you mean
bicycle_road = yes ?

Jan
22016-12-30 12:34:40 UTCmarczoutendijk @mueschel:
In the Netherlands we have a special type of road (Fietsstraat) that is for bicycles, but vehicles are allowed.
See:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging.
See overpass for its use:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kWo
32016-12-30 13:01:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
I didn't notice the spelling mistake in the key (3x e in streeet) and then wasn't able to find any other use of this key.

Btw, such a road in Germany would be tagged as
bicycle_road = yes
motor_vehicle=yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Fahrradstrasse_IMGP8343_smial_wp.jpg
42016-12-30 13:47:51 UTCmarczoutendijk I fixed the typo in cyclestreet.

52016-12-30 13:50:21 UTCmarczoutendijk Using the tagging you propose isn't the solution because of different legal rights for both type of roads.
62016-12-30 13:54:46 UTCmueschel If it's established tagging, it's fine with me. I didn't want to start a discussion about it. On the other hand, even a highway=motorway has different legal rights in different countries. So there might be a chance to find a common tagging in the future.

Cheers, Jan
72016-12-30 14:08:48 UTCmarczoutendijk This subject (cyclestreet) sure has the attention of the Dutch mapping community!
12016-12-30 13:14:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
the parking place has two tags
customers = yes
pulic = no (note the spelling mistake)

Usually this is tagged as
access=customers.

Cheers, Jan
12016-12-29 13:38:54 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM!
I think you have a spelling mistake on this node, what does "slnow=Slide" mean?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4573490972

Jan
12016-12-29 13:37:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
did you check the license of this data? The website mentions a "Copyrightvermerk" is needed, OSM can't guarantee this.

Jan
22016-12-29 16:00:55 UTCulamm That is no problem of the licence, as long as we do not copy the course from public servers.

The source for correct name of any element of the landscape are official maps and official data servers.
The only way to avoid invented names is to cite the official sources.

Normally I'd only note th...
32017-01-01 20:25:54 UTCdatendelphin Hi ulamm
Unfortunately we can not use Swisstopo, also not for correcting the spelling. Valid sources can be documents or news paper articles. Best would be a sign on the ground. But the maps and databases are definitely off limits. Sorry. I hope you will find some other source.
12016-12-29 13:33:39 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM!
I found tags like these on this hotel:

Estacionamiento = Al lado cabaña
Etiquetas = Los Lleuques, Pinto, Ñuble, Bío Bío, Chile
parrilla = SI
piscina = SI

This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no so...
12016-12-28 14:09:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this object?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426194034
The tag looks strange:
12-0517 = uncontrolled
Jan
22016-12-28 14:49:01 UTCAndrzej3345 Thanks for indication. Already fixed.
Correct is ref=12-0517.
BTW, how you discovered that minor mistake - any proofing tool. Happy to hear if I can use it in the future.
32016-12-28 15:02:29 UTCmueschel Hi Andrzej,
I wrote a small tool that uses Taginfo to search for new keys:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
42016-12-28 17:18:25 UTCAndrzej3345 ok, thanks, I will look at it.
12016-12-28 14:39:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this building?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461677093
The tag "957 =753" looks strange.

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-04 00:54:01 UTCu_kubota Thank you for your comment.
This tag was given with an erroneous operation, it is not intentionally added.
So I deleted it.
12016-12-28 14:38:59 UTCmueschel Hallo,

an diesem Tag stimmt etwas nicht, was möchtest du ausdrücken?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30773848
"acces:conditional \tnone @ destination"

Gruß, Jan
22016-12-28 19:41:18 UTCrschwarz danke für den Hinweis, ich hatte die Tags für die bedingte Beschränkung verwechselt (gemeint war maxweight = 7.5 + Anlieger frei), soeben korrigiert.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions
-cheers-
12016-12-28 14:28:43 UTCmueschel Hallo,
hier stimmt wohl etwas mit dem Tagging nicht:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4571628022

Gruß, Jan
12016-12-28 14:25:56 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ist das ein Hotel oder heißt das Gebäude nur so? Falls ja, fehlt noch ein tourism=hotel tag.

Gruß, Jan
12016-12-28 14:24:15 UTCmueschel Hallo,
bitte achte mehr auf die Schreibweise von Keys. Ich korrigiere hier jede Woche Fehler in den Keys wie in opening_houts oder number_of_appartmentsappartments

Jan
12016-12-28 14:21:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4570794979
" Pradanella = Bar Roma" looks wrong.

Jan
22016-12-28 22:26:12 UTCsimone_girardelli My error, Predanella is name.
I corrected the tag, thanks for signalling.
12016-12-28 13:46:41 UTCmueschel Hallo,
wieso passt ein highway=footway, footway=crossing nicht mit einem Zeichen DE:240 zusammen?
22016-12-30 12:07:42 UTCOttonormalverbraucher Hallo,

gem. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland gibt es für das Zeichen DE:240 zwei Möglichkeiten: highway=path und highway=cycleway.
12016-12-28 13:16:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

I found some mistakes in this changeset:
All the nodes of the buildings got a "building=yes" tag - this tag should only be on the way representing the building.

Second, the buildings have some strange tags like "0_5M=0" which don't look like they belon...
22016-12-30 19:04:32 UTCpitscheplatsch further suspiciously changesets ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44703287

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44703287
12016-12-06 11:33:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found three trees with strange tags:
diameter_crown = width: 4.0; color: green;
thuja = occidentalis
Could you check these?

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-20 15:40:38 UTCpezza10 First of all I apologize myself but can I ask who you are?
and second why are strange tags?,which one of them?
32016-12-27 21:50:26 UTCmueschel I'm just another OSM mapper...

How can a 'diameter' be 'green'?
'thuja occidentalis' can be the species, but 'thuja' is not a recognized tag.
12016-12-27 14:11:01 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du diesen Parkplatz überprüfen? Das Tag 120=60 macht keinen Sinn:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194297499

Gruß, Jan
22016-12-27 16:55:24 UTCscai Oh, du hast natürlich recht. Das sollte capacity=120 werden. Hab es korrigiert, danke für den Hinweis!
12016-12-27 13:43:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
this node has a capacity, but no other tag. could you check that? Btw. there should be no capital letters in keys (usually)
http://osm.org/node/4565847889

Cheers, Jan
12016-12-27 13:26:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

Please make sure that the spelling of your tags is always correct - misspelled tags can not be understood by any software. Could you have a look to your edits and correct these mistakes?
E.g. I found:
fire_hydrant:citi
fire_hydrant:houaenumber
fire_hydrant:sireet
fire_hy...
12016-12-27 13:24:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check the spelling of your tags.
325x "fire_boundar" (should be fire_boundary)
23x "fire operator" (should be fire_operator)

Jan
12016-12-26 14:30:52 UTCmueschel Welcome to OSM!
I noticed some nodes with a tag like "walmart=walmart" - this doesn't help much, because there is no tag describing what it actually is. The correct way of tagging would be "shop=supermarket" "name=walmart".
You can find a lot of information on tagg...
12016-12-26 14:15:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tag
"baliisi = {toistopiste=false, uunta=laskeva}"
on four nodes - is this a mistake?

Cheers, Jan
12016-12-26 14:14:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are two poles with misspelled tags, 'bname' and 'bane'.
I think that these and all the name tags should be changed to ref=* - the numbers are not names, but reference numbers.

Cheers, Jan
12016-12-26 12:50:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
can you check this POI? It has 3 strange tags
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460833686

Republiki = Francji
note = some
sources = report

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-28 02:25:01 UTCkocio Thanks, I'll fix it! This is JOSM copying bug, but I thought I have managed to avoid it...
12016-12-26 12:46:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4170847320
The tags look rather suspicious:
deleted=as
per=\tcomment

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-26 18:12:10 UTCrehan727 this poi is placed at incorrect location. Also duplicate exists . so deleting this one now. thanks for pointing.
12016-12-24 12:22:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
it's 'recycling', not 'recyclyng'. I just fixed that for you.

Have some nice holidays, Jan
12016-12-24 10:59:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tag 'lvl' on these edits that doesn't exist in other places. I think it it the elevation of the points and should be 'ele' - but has to be converted to meters.

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-25 11:09:54 UTCjendrusk Of course you're right Jan - thanks. I'll fix it after x-mas. :)
12016-12-23 21:10:51 UTCmueschel Hi and welcome to OSM,
could you have a look to the tagging?
'opening_hours' needs to follow a well-defined syntax, otherwise it can not be read by software.
'description' is not meant to be used for advertising slogans
'service:bicycle:...' - please have a look to the wiki: https://wiki.opens...
12016-12-23 21:03:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tag "true =A" on 9 ways - looks like a mistake. Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-24 21:39:35 UTCtrolleway Fixed, thanks.
12016-12-23 21:00:12 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ich habe hier das Tag "footway:track =track" gefunden, das sonst nirgends verwendet wird. Was genau bedeutet es?

Gruß, Jan
22016-12-24 07:28:38 UTCOttonormalverbraucher Hallo Jan, es bedeutet, dass ich mich verschrieben habe. Es sollte links oder rechts heißen. Die Sache ist die, dass ich mich in Thüringen dazu habe hinreißen lassen, außerhalb meines eigentlichen Vorhabens Verkehrszeichen anzubringen, weitere Bearbeitungen durchzuführen,...
32016-12-25 11:50:04 UTCOttonormalverbraucher genannte Eintragung mittels http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44660105 zurückgesetzt
12016-12-23 20:53:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this import of data? All the nodes have many tags which don't seem to belong to the OSM database.

Btw, what is the source of this data? Is it available under a license compatible with ODbL?

Jan
12016-12-22 11:48:48 UTCmueschel Hallo,
schau doch mal ins Wiki zu opening_hours. Da gibt es eine feste Syntax, damit man die Zeiten auswerten kann:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours?uselang=de-DE

Gruss, Jan
12016-12-22 11:45:57 UTCmueschel Hallo,
schau doch mal ins Wiki zu opening_hours. Da gibt es eine feste Syntax, damit man die Zeiten auswerten kann:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours?uselang=de-DE

surgery_hours sollte auch besser umbenannt werden in opening_hours:surgery - das wird schon ein paar Mal verwe...
22016-12-26 22:30:46 UTCdonzooles Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, wurde korrigiert. :)
12016-12-21 11:38:10 UTCmueschel Hi donalberto,
welcome to OSM!

I found the tag "otro=agroquímicos" on several of your added objects. This is not a common tag in OSM and not documented. Could you have a look to the Wiki and find a better suited tag? Please let me know if you need help!

Jan
22016-12-21 16:30:24 UTCdonalberto Hi Jan. I try to tag this places as a store that sells seeds, herbicides,pesticides etc. and i could not find a better tag. could you help me with this. thanks.
donalberto
32016-12-21 20:16:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
shop=garden_centre is exactly what you are looking for. You can give a more detailed description with the description = ... tag.
The tag otro=agroquímicos should be removed in this case.

Jan
12016-12-21 12:06:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
found the tag 'WH=no' on this way. Could you check that?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460042396

Cheers, Jan
12016-12-21 11:56:11 UTCmueschel Hi & welcome to OSM,

I found many uncommon tags on your edits, like here:
http://osm.org/way/460001598
Gender of owner = Female
Type of ownership = Unknown
building type = Commercial
building-status = Complete
building_material = Concrete Blocks
water_supply = From house wi...
12016-12-20 12:02:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
this and three other objects have many strange tags. Did you really want to add them to the OSM database or was it a mistake?

Jan


AREA_HA=185.61
BESLMYND=Länsstyrelse
BESLSTATUS=Gällande
DIARIENR=5112-02706-2009
FORVALTARE=Länsstyrelsen i Örebro län
GEOSTAT...
22016-12-20 15:38:16 UTCErik Hagelberg Hi there Jan!

It was a mistake during import. Did a quick overpass-turbo query and notices similar mistakes done on previous imports. Thanks fot the heads up. All is now corrected. Best wishes Erik H.
12016-12-20 11:58:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found these two tags in your edits:
sensor:lanes
sensor:ref_lanes

I think they are wrong and should be
traffic:sensor:lanes
traffic:sensor:ref:lanes

Could you confirm/correct this?
Jan
12016-12-20 11:45:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
can you check these nodes? The tags look strange:

Martin = light:type=spotlight
de = Saint


Jan
12016-12-19 10:54:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
looking at this POI I see that it has many uncommon tags. OSM needs tags that are well-defined to be able to have software making use of the information.

NRHP# = 75001992
RTHL# = 4100
TSAL# = 370
What are these numbers?

organization1:name = National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)\...
12016-12-19 10:46:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
all the nodes of this ares have many strange tags. Did you really want to add them to OSM or was it a mistake?

Cheers, Jan
22016-12-19 23:59:32 UTCportalaventura Sim. A fonte dos dados é a lei DE74/2016: http://www.camara-sm.rs.gov.br/camara/proposicao/Decretos-do-executivo/2016/1/0/13221
32016-12-20 01:21:04 UTCnaoliv Talvez não precisa de nenhuma tag além de nome (ou ref, possivelmente).
Note que distância e azimute dá para se calcular de um ponto ao outro. O x e y são coordenadas (em UTM?). Se você adicionar o nó na sua posição geográfica, con...
42016-12-20 02:56:02 UTCportalaventura Peço desculpas pelo descuido não eram para essas informações serem adicionadas. Era pra ser só o que estava na tag name. Removi e migrei name para ref, como sugerido, porque é mesmo código de referencia.
12016-12-18 12:24:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460229275
It has a misspelled tag.

Jan
22016-12-18 17:23:03 UTCThue Janus Kristensen Tak, fikset.
12016-12-17 13:49:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? The tag " restiction:hgv = parking:lane:right" looks strange.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459217769

Jan
22016-12-17 13:56:38 UTCbeer_absorber Hi. I doubt about this tag but don't understand what is will be the best. Maybe you have experience?
32016-12-17 14:00:28 UTCmueschel Can you explain what you want to tag? I can't guess from the tag.
42016-12-17 15:36:52 UTCbeer_absorber On this road part right side parking prohibited for truck and heavy velocity
52016-12-17 16:53:09 UTCmueschel That's... complicated. I will see if I can find something.
12016-12-17 13:48:32 UTCmueschel Hallo,
das Tagging scheint hier nicht ganz zu stimmen.

Gruß, Jan
22016-12-25 21:51:49 UTCNordpfeil Hallo Jan,
da ist tatsächlich was durcheinandergeraten. Werde das gleich ändern. Besten Dank
Nordpfeil
12016-12-15 09:40:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you review your changes? There are many tags that are not used anywhere else. Tags that can not be used by any software are rather useless. E.g.:

damage:=major - there should be no : in the tag

damage:building=residential - this should be building=residential

damage:street=ki...
12016-12-11 15:56:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the new tag ''bikeability" in your edits. I think you were looking for "class:bicycle"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:class:bicycle

Jan
22016-12-14 15:01:25 UTCMichaelsne Hi, we are adding in the ability level required to cycle on certain roads. We were going to set the bikeability level of all roads in southend ranging from 1 (easiest) to 3 (most difficult). Would this be okay to do so? https://bikeability.org.uk/
32016-12-14 16:06:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is this about? Experience level for children? We do have several tags for classification already:
class:bicycle
class:bicycle:commute (this could fit)
mtb:scale (mountain trails)

I think the best solution is to make a mapping of your classification to existing tags. This allows exist...
42016-12-14 16:08:52 UTCmueschel PS: Do you have a permit to use information from this website for OSM? The page states that "Information collected is not shared with other organisations for commercial purposes.", implying that it is not suited for OSM (i.e. compatible with ODbL)
52016-12-14 16:56:58 UTCMichaelsne The bikeability levels we would add to OSM would be our own data that we have generated. I was using that page as an example of what the bikeability is for sorry. Means you can then have cycle routing that is dependent on what the road is rated for the ability level. Does this seem like something th...
62016-12-14 21:32:43 UTCmueschel I don't see a contradiction to the existing class:bicycle.
My opinion is not the one that counts. The best thing is to have a discussion with a wider group of mappers, e.g. in the forums or on the mailing list.
12016-12-14 11:54:50 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was hat denn das Tag an diesem Knoten zu bedeuten? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2323682207

Gruss, Jan
12016-12-14 10:12:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you review these to objects? Tagging seems weird:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459433804
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459446638

Jan
12016-12-12 19:28:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
"water_street" is a strange tag. Are you looking for water_tank:street?
Jan
12016-12-12 19:27:09 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM!
you invented several new tags here, for example these:
eastincome \t红旗大街
northincome \t礼贤路
northlane \tleft|through|ped
southincome \t红旗大街
southlane \tleft|through|ped
westincome \t红旗大街

OSM can only work with well-defined tags. Please have ...
12016-12-12 11:51:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
www.openstreetmap.org/node/1081202325

hi = tu - not a valid tag
noexit =yes - there is a footway and a service way, but no way that ends here.

Jan
12016-12-12 11:47:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this building? It has two roof:shape tags.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432949109

Jan
22016-12-12 16:31:14 UTCNighto Oops. That was probably an editor error, there (obviously) should be only one. Thanks for finding it.
12016-12-12 11:37:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many buildings with a spelling mistake: 'demage' instead of 'damage'. Could you check this?

If you want, I can help correcting this.
Jan
12016-12-12 11:32:20 UTCmueschel Moin,
hier hat's 88 Mal "surce:maxspeed" mit fehlendem o.

Jan
12016-12-12 11:30:23 UTCmueschel Hallo,
in diesem Changeset habe ich Tags gefunden wie diese:

beschreibu=Mullbraunerde-Buchenwälder
deutsch=typischer Braunerde-Buchenwald
farbe=3.0
forstgrad=0.0
mischform=0.0

Dieses Tagging nutzt in OSM nichts, da es keine definierten Tags verwendet, die von Software ausgewertet wer...
22016-12-12 17:42:59 UTCOpenMapMax Ja, daran arbeite ich noch. War auch nicht beabsichtigt die Änderung schon hoch zu laden. Fehlen noch gewisse Waldabschnitte und vorallem verbindung von angrenzenden Wiesen. Es ist noch etwas arbeit aber ich mach das möglichst bald fertig.
32016-12-12 17:54:51 UTCOpenMapMax von den zusätzlichen Tags leite ich nur noch den tag "leaf_type" ab, dann kommen alle nutzlosen Tags wegg, Die äußere Linie von den betreffenden Waldgebieten möchte ich noch genauer anpassen und mit den umliegenden Flächen verbinden (momentan überlappen noch ...
12016-12-11 17:24:22 UTCmueschel Dürfen an dieser barrier auch keine Fußgänger oder Radfahrer durch?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4506685068
22016-12-11 18:17:28 UTCNiedernhausenerJunge Ja dürfen sie. Habs geändert
12016-12-11 16:00:01 UTCmueschel Hallo,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97672964
An diesem Weg hast du das Tag "zzz" gesetzt - kannst du das überprüfen?

Gruß, Jan
22016-12-12 17:51:09 UTCOttonormalverbraucher Hallo Jan, danke für den Hinweis. Habe diesen Fehler mit dem Änderungssatz http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44352419 korrigiert. Gruß Ottonormalverbraucher.
12016-12-11 15:45:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
I noticed these 91 nodes with tags from your GPS:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kAn
I think they are not needed in OSM. Would you mind if I delete them?

Jan
22016-12-12 17:36:39 UTCWirePiper Hello,

Sure you can delete any GPS trace, as long as no roads or other features are loss in the process.
12016-12-11 12:57:52 UTCmueschel Hi, I found 180 objects like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442584084

Most of the "damage:" tags are misspelled and even contradicting each other. This makes the tags rather useless because they can not be shown e.g. on a map.
12016-12-10 17:49:53 UTCmueschel Wenn hier durchgehende barrier=kerb erfasst sind, müssten dann nicht auch die abgesenkten Bordsteinkanten an den Kreuzungen eingetragen werden? Die meisten Radwege führen hier ja nunmal nicht über Bordsteinkanten.
22016-12-10 19:13:57 UTCz∈ℂ Stimmt, mir war die Existenz des Tags kerb=lowered/flush nicht bewusst, ich dachte, so etwas wäre nur über height=* zu realisieren gewesen. In der jetzigen Variante wird ein Hindernis impliziert, es wäre also sinnvoll, diese Information zu ergänzen (auch allgemein für Fu&szl...
12016-12-10 17:31:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put a strange tag on this node, could you check it?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4542863215

Jan
22016-12-10 17:45:25 UTCEliziR Hi,

Fixed ;)

Thanks @mueschel
12016-12-10 10:54:01 UTCliteran please do not make such changes. I used Healthcare 2.0 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0#Medical_system_2 ) tags.
22016-12-10 11:31:50 UTCmueschel Me too:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0/Specialties
Homeopathy is listed as a specialty, not as a medial_system.
32016-12-10 11:41:08 UTCliteran hmmm.... it's very strange cause homeopathy is not the specialty of tradicional medicine. like ayurveeda, chinese medicine. What medical_system: tag should we use for homeopathy? Propose to leave both tags
42016-12-10 16:05:41 UTCmueschel The health_specialty tag is already used a few times. A change should be discussed within the proposal / its Talk page.
12016-12-10 12:24:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain all those ways? They have no common OSM tags, and seem not to match anything on the ground.

Jan
12016-12-10 11:28:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
If found the misspelled key "damage:assesment" in your edits. 'assessment' is written with 4 s.
Let me know if you want me to fix that for you.

Jan
12016-12-09 22:07:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 6 nodes don't have any physical tag, like amenity or shop. Just the name is not enough to be useful in OSM. Could you update them?

Jan
12016-12-09 22:04:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
do we really need tags like these in OSM?
chainage_end=27161.5996094
chainage_start=14396.2998047
shape_length=12765.2998022

Btw, the key name:proposed should be proposed:name.

Jan
12016-12-09 21:27:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tag "Intervención =VdE" on many objects. This is not a common tag. Could you explain the meaning or change to another tagging?
Jan
12016-12-09 21:20:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the keys ref:FLIK and ref:flik - can you just use one spelling? Btw, did you check that this source is licensed in a way compatible to OSM?

Jan
22016-12-10 02:43:24 UTCStereo Hi Jan,

Yes, the data is CC-0, https://data.public.lu/en/datasets/referentiel-des-parcelles-agricoles-flik/

You’re right that it’s not good to mix the case; I’ll correct the lowercase to FLIK.
32016-12-10 03:07:50 UTCStereo Done, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44295866

Thank you for making me aware of this!
12016-12-09 15:55:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
I never heard of a currency named 'XLT-GBAR' - could you explain these tags?

Jan
22016-12-09 19:46:59 UTCFrViPofm Of course, you have never heard. It's new... It's a guess of mapping LETS.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:FrViPofm/Key:local_currency
32016-12-09 19:55:51 UTCmueschel Thanks, I didn't find this wiki page using google. I think the plan would benefit from being converted to a full proposal. I don't know if it makes sense to have keys with cash/contactless - what about e.g. chip cards, coupons? I would move this information to the value, not to the key.
12016-12-09 15:53:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several buildings with a spelling mistake: 'damege' instead of 'damage'.

If you want, I can correct this for you.
Jan
12016-12-09 15:53:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several buildings with a spelling mistake: 'demage' instead of 'damage'.

If you want, I can correct this for you.
Jan
12016-12-09 15:52:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several buildings with a spelling mistake: 'damaage' instead of 'damage'.

If you want, I can correct this for you.
Jan
12016-12-08 11:59:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
in this changeset you created many relations withhout any meaningful tags, only foreign ones.
Could you check & correct this?

Jan
22016-12-08 15:16:07 UTCnaoliv @mueschel it seems to be an undiscussed import

realkaka, você está importando os dados aqui? Existe autorização para uso dessas informações?

Por favor, discuta esse processo antes com a comunidade, através da lista, forum ou outro canal. É...
32016-12-08 19:06:16 UTCrealkaka @naoliv oi, estou usando a Planta de Referencia Cadastral Digital da Cidade de Cuiabá, versão 5, da Prefeitura Municipal de Cuiabá, está disponível na web e não há restrições, só há se tiver uso comercial, o que acredito n&...
42016-12-08 19:08:21 UTCrealkaka @mueschel I'll check and correct the wrong information during the week
12016-12-08 11:38:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are two ways with some wrong tagging:
oneway:bicycle =no
oneway:bicycle_1 =yes

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37681882
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458180212

Jan
12016-12-08 11:32:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check some of your bus stops? There are many foreign tags like on this node: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4149470376
Jan
22017-04-17 09:06:19 UTCbrianboru Node deleted and replaced with standard naptan tags
12016-12-07 11:44:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of the bus stops? There are some not common tags on the nodes:

departure = journalier
departure_per_day = 1
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Interval


destination_place = Niamey, Niger
Commonly tagged as 'to=*'

e-mail = stm_t...
12016-12-07 11:24:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
all the nodes you added in this changeset are pretty useless for OSM: They don't have any tag describing what they are. No map or software can use them in the present state.
Please have a look in the wiki, e.g. for example how shops have to be tagged.

Jan
12016-12-07 11:20:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "osmuser=MapMakinMeyers" on many objects - your user name should not appear in the tags of a node.
Could you remove this?

Jan
22016-12-07 12:18:52 UTCMapMakinMeyers Jan,
Sorry, It was my first time using JOSM. Is there a easy way to do this? not sure how it happened.

Thanks and sorry about this issue
32016-12-07 12:32:19 UTCMapMakinMeyers I think I removed them - Sorry about this mess. Please let me know if it is gone
12016-12-05 14:27:04 UTChighflyer74 Hello mapmakerwbd!

I came across this gas station and the tagging you added to it. First of all: each item in OSM is only tagged once. This is currently not the case. Also: please only use the established key=value combinations laid out in the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Pa...
22016-12-06 11:21:35 UTCmueschel I have on more remark: Is this the real name of this amenity? Typically, the full name of the city and street are not part of the name.
32017-01-23 13:00:39 UTCmarczoutendijk Hallo mapmakerwbd,
Je hebt nog niet gereageerd op het commentaar hierboven. Je hebt een aantal zaken verkeerd op de kaart gezet.
Ik heb de verkeerde sleutels weer verwijderd. Bovendien stond het hele benzinestation 2 keer op de kaart. Het moet op het gebouw, of op de adresnode, maar niet op alletw...
12016-12-06 11:10:48 UTCmueschel Hi, and welcome to OSM!

I noticed many tags in your edits that do not follow common tagging standards. These tags are rather useless, because software does not know them and they can not appear on any map. Please have a look in the wiki about common tags for e.g. buildings, or ask for help in the...
12016-12-06 10:04:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the misspelled key "add:province" (instead of 'addr:province') 198 times in your edits. Would you mind correcting it?

Let me know if you need help,
Jan
12016-12-04 21:16:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found tags like "water tank:street" on 23 of your objects. There should be no spaces in keys, could you change them to the correct keys?
Jan
22016-12-04 21:27:58 UTCAleks-Berlin I fixed some tags, but did not detect all mistakes. So its not my objects. But I try to fix within this week. KR, Alex
32016-12-04 21:37:27 UTCmueschel Sorry, I didn't look close enough. I commented the right changeset now.
42016-12-05 19:19:40 UTCAleks-Berlin Anyway: I think/hope I fixed them all now :-)
12016-12-04 21:36:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found tags like "water tank:street" on 23 of your objects. There should be no spaces in keys, could you change them to the correct keys?
Jan
12016-12-04 21:30:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tag "sideb = 25 mph" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12016904
Jan
12016-12-04 21:29:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
was heißt "rathausplatz=2" an diesem Parkplatz?
22016-12-04 22:07:37 UTCgmbo Ich hatte die Angabe bekommen, dass sich inm Parkhaus unterhalb des Rathausplatzes 2 ein ausgewiesener Motoradparkplatz mit 4 Stellplätzen befindet.
Die Zufahrt wäre von der Altenauer Str.
32016-12-05 14:40:33 UTChighflyer74 Moin gmbo!

Das Tagging passt da noch nicht so ganz, wie mueschel schon angedeutet hat. Es geht speziell um https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4533810508. Wenn die Position nicht genau bekannt ist, dann könntest Du die Dir vorliegenden Informationen in das schon vorhandene fixme=* schreiben. ...
42016-12-05 15:49:03 UTCgmbo Ich wollte keinen neuen Key erfinden, wenn dann müsste mir da ein Tippfehler passiert sein, aber ich habe da ein Addr-Tag angehängt Straße und Hausnummer wie das in einigen Städten gemacht wird. Ich gehe davon aus dass der Augang in Rathausplatz 2 ist.
Würde den Parkplatz ...
12016-12-04 21:24:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging? Tags should always be common tags and no newly invented ones, e.g.
Aantal Kassa,s \t6
Geldautomaat \tJa
Kofiebuffet \tJa

Also, 'opening_hours' has a well defined syntax which is required that it can be understood by software.

Jan
12016-12-04 21:13:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found these tags on two of your POIs:
lg::en=yes
lg:fr=yes
lg:oc=yes
Did you mean language:en = yes?

Jan
12016-11-30 11:14:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
die vielen deutschsprachigen Tags an diesen beiden POIs sind leider nutzlos, weil keine gängige Software sie versteht. Kannst du das auf die im Wiki gezeigten Werte ändern?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

Nebenbei, du gibst die Webseite der Stadt als...
22016-12-04 15:12:09 UTC5bird Hi,
vielen Dank für dein Feedback.

Klar ändere ich die Tags.

Deinen Hinweis mit der Verwednugn der Daten begrüße ich sehr.
Habe grade in der Datenschutzerklärung ( http://www.denzlingen-online.de/datenschutzerklaerung,44350.html ) nachgesehen und mit Schrecken festg...
32016-12-04 15:20:02 UTCmueschel Die Daten der Webseite darf man zur persönlichen Information nutzen, nur nicht weiterverteilen. U.u. lohnt sich ein Telefonat mit einem Verantwortlichen der Stadt, und zu erklären was man mit den Daten machen will - vielleicht ergibt sich ja dabei auch eine weitergehende Kooperation mit de...
42016-12-04 15:34:31 UTC5bird Wow, das ist ja eine schnelle Antwort. Vielen Dank.
Der Stadt hinterher telefonieren werde ich im Moment nicht - bin auch zu neu, um mit der Stadt den Nutzen von OSM zu diskutieren.
Da ich diesen POI nicht besuchen werde, halte ich daher eine Aktualisierung meinerseits für nicht möglich....
12016-12-04 13:29:16 UTCmueschel Hallo,
warum hast du denn an dieser Relation alle Tags gelöscht?
Gruß, Jan
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2027802
12016-12-04 13:03:35 UTCmueschel Hallo Marco,
willkommen bei OSM. Bitte achte bei deinen Edits darauf, welche Objekte schon existieren. z.B. diese Schule ist schon lange eingetragen, und du hast sie noch zwei weitere Male eingetragen. Diese doppelten Einträge habe ich gerade wieder gelöscht.

Grüße, Jan
12016-12-03 15:46:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
http://osm.org/way/457053594
What is the meaning of the tag "Sicco = Kopka"?
22016-12-03 19:19:45 UTCc-l Hi
It did not notice that I had set such a tag.
I have removed it.
Thanks for your notyce.
12016-12-03 15:43:19 UTCmueschel Hallo,
mir sind hier einige merkwürdige Tags aufgefallen, z.B. hier:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457071377

Kannst du deine Edits in der Ecke nochmal überprüfen?
Gruß, Jan

Gemeinde = Bad Hönningen
Haus_Zusat = 64
Hausnr = 64
Straße = Ariendorfer ...
12016-12-03 15:36:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tag "Zwig=Stross" on this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29116589

Cheers, Jan
12016-12-03 15:29:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check this way, the tagging went wrong.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456697591

Cheers, Jan
12016-12-03 15:27:16 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du mal nach diesem Way schauen? Das Tagging stimmt nicht.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456767918

Gruss, Jan
12016-12-02 19:05:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these relations? The key 'Kierunek' - could you change it to English? If I understand it correctly, this should be from=* and to=*.
Cheers, Jan
12016-12-02 18:50:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tags name_alt and name_alt:fr
Usually the key "alt_name" is used. Maybe you want to change this?

Jan
22016-12-02 18:54:48 UTCKevo Oops, thanks for catching that. I'll fix that when I have some free time this weekend. :)
32016-12-04 04:47:51 UTCKevo Fixed those tags on the 401.
12016-12-01 11:52:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 318 objects with misspelled tags, for example "addr: city" instead of "addr:city". Can you correct this?
Jan
22016-12-02 14:33:43 UTCRaymille how do i correct it po?
32016-12-02 15:15:30 UTCRaymille sir, can i know po if it's okay na? i tried going back to the tiles i edited two days ago but i'm sure if i edited the right objects para po macount yung 318 na misspelled tags. thank you po!
42016-12-02 18:48:50 UTCmueschel There were 119 more buildings with these tags, I changed them right now in
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44121184
52016-12-02 19:31:48 UTCRaymille i checked it na po sir. thank you so much po!
12016-12-02 11:47:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of the restaurants you edited? The values of the tags (e.g. diet, cuisine, opening_hours) must be in English and follow the common tagging schemes (e.g. opening_hours as a fixed syntax that is understood by software).

Jan
12016-12-01 15:19:00 UTCdanovar das ist kein name:de sondern höchstens ein österreichischer Name (aus der Zeit Österreich-Ungarns), d.h. ein name:öst. Vielleicht gibt es in Österreich jemanden der diese bezeichnungen immer noch verwendet. In Deutschland oder Kroatien sind diese Namen nicht bekannt und soll...
22016-12-01 20:47:41 UTCmueschel name:öst kann nicht stimmen - die Kürzel nach name sind immer iso 639 codes für Sprachen. Wenn deutschsprachig, dann also name:de.
Wenn es ein alter Name ist, wie du beschreibst, ist das passende Tag old_name, wie es auch eingetragen ist.
32016-12-02 09:54:55 UTCdanovar Alles klar. Hatte ich aber auch schon mal probiert (old_name:de), dann wurde es auch nach einiger Zeit wieder zurück geändert.

Auf irgendeiner OSM-Diskussionsseite zu diesem Thema hatte ich dann name:öst gesehen, so dass ich dachte, das wäre ja ne gute Idee. Vielleicht gibt es...
12016-11-30 10:40:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these nodes have an awful lot of foreign tags, but no common OSM tags. Did you really want to upload this to the OSM database?
Jan
22016-11-30 12:31:04 UTCSilencialschirwa hallo

this is not the type of date i wanted to upload. this has been mistakenly uploaded. i tried to reverse the situation but my internet could not allow
32016-11-30 12:48:47 UTCmueschel Let me know if you need help. I can revert this changeset if you like.
42016-11-30 13:12:53 UTCSilencialschirwa if you can help me then please help so that this data can in the right format
52016-11-30 19:33:00 UTCmueschel Do you want to edit the existing nodes or do you want them to be deleted?
62016-12-01 07:02:17 UTCSilencialschirwa i want them to be deleted
72016-12-01 19:04:13 UTCmueschel Ok, deleted in this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44094233
12016-11-30 11:40:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way and adjacent ones?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456228298

I don't understand these two tags, maybe we can find a more standard way to tag these:
Debris = Basin
Mabey = Canyon

Cheers, Jan
22016-11-30 17:58:16 UTCThe Temecula Mapper Tks. That was a copy-and-paste error when the creek was tagged. Fixed.
12016-11-30 11:24:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this object?
Earth =#E9967A - no idea what this colour is

Niveles del edificio \t.01
Should this be building:levels? What is .01?

amenity=parking_space
A building to park cars is just amenity=parking
12016-11-29 11:47:00 UTCmueschel Hallo,
bitte schau mal nach deiner Tagging-Vorlage, ich habe schon mehrmals keys wie
"number_of_apartmentsapartments" korrigieren müssen.
Gruß, Jan
12016-11-28 19:20:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these 108 buildings? They all have the strange tag
"addr:province=Misamis Oriental=building=yes"

Cheers, Jan
12016-11-27 20:37:41 UTCmueschel This building has two address tags, one is misspelled. Please check which one is correct:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94595252
Thanks, Jan
22016-11-28 05:21:13 UTCLidaCity не вельмі разумею, што за заўвага, бо вуглавыя дамы могуць мець два адрасы, па афіцыйным крыніцам адзін адрас, а на доме другі (магчыма таму, что гэты адрас лічаць пры...
32016-11-28 09:33:07 UTCmueschel The two tags add2r:housenumber and addr2:street are definitely wrong and should be removed. If the house has two addresses, they have to appear on two different nodes.
12016-11-26 19:57:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "zone:traffic:DE =urban" to several ways. First, this tag should be zone:traffic=DE:urban. Second, these ways are in Belgium, hence DE:urban can not be right.

Jan
22016-11-26 20:15:58 UTCloconvey Hello Jan - thats my fault, you're right. What do you propose? The roads should be blocked for heavy vehicles. What about maxgcweight=3.5 ?
32016-11-26 20:23:49 UTCmueschel This would be maxweight=3.5
42016-11-26 20:29:26 UTCloconvey That should do it then?
52016-11-27 11:58:35 UTCmueschel Yes, that 's sufficient. The more special tags like maxgcweight are only needed in special cases, a simple "not heavier than" is just 'maxweight'.
12016-11-26 20:32:05 UTCmueschel Hallo,
bitte achte etwas auf die Schreibweise von Tags. In deinen Edits habe ich Keys wie
"camera:angel" und "w" gefunden.

Gruß, Jan
12016-11-26 20:04:09 UTCmueschel Hi and welcome to OSM,
I found several ways with tags like these:
Vòng xuyến=công viên nước
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43140829

This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Please have a look to the wiki...
12016-11-26 20:00:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du das Tagging hier überprüfen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3594486008?

"xy" - soll vielleicht fire_hydrant:diameter heißen?
Gruß, Jan
12016-11-26 19:58:40 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check the tagging of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454925278 and the next steps? There seems to be a mistake with tagging.

Cheers, Jan
12016-11-24 07:20:57 UTCmueschel Hi, could you have a look to this way? Tagging seems weird.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454866700

Cheers, Jan
22016-11-24 07:42:28 UTCwmyrda Yeah, Copy & paste error. Thanks for spotting that one
32016-11-24 07:45:25 UTCwmyrda fixed http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43912920
12016-11-23 11:56:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several keys 'manmade' in your edits. The correct spelling is 'man_made'.

Cheers, Jan
22016-11-23 14:55:02 UTCtmasao Hi Jan,
Thanks for letting me know.
This is caused by a typo in a custom preset of JOSM. I'd fix it. Thanks again.
Best regards,
Masao
12016-11-23 11:43:53 UTCmueschel Hallo,
dieser Node hat den Tag 'rvn=yes' bekommen, den es sonst nicht gibt. Schreibfehler? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/38505379

Gruss, Jan
22016-11-23 19:45:35 UTCohligser Hallo,
ehrlich gesagt war mir das Tag für "Regionalnetz" entfallen. Stimmt, rcn wäre da wohl eher richtig.
Aber für nodes ist das, meine ich, sowieso nicht geregelt.
Wäre rcn=yes aus Deiner Sicht brauchbar?
Gruss, ohligser
12016-11-23 11:41:24 UTCmueschel Hi and welcome to OSM.
Did you really want to add this highway? I guess it was just a mistake and can be deleted?
I also found this node that doesn't have an english tag. Could you add one of the common tags for objects? Without the node can not be used in any of our software. http://www.openstre...
12016-11-22 11:01:01 UTCmueschel Hi and welcome to OSM,
you put a lot of information on this node - unfortunately most of the tags are new and not documented. That means, no software or map tool is able to understand it and interpret it correctly. Could you have a look to the wiki for common tagging schemes, or check the mapping o...
12016-11-21 22:33:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 24 ways all have the tag "true=A". Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22016-11-22 07:43:46 UTCMrYadro Yep, sure, thanks for contacting me.
12016-11-20 13:15:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "true=A" on 30 ways - could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22016-11-21 22:18:17 UTCclaysmalley wat. dunno how that happened; i'll fix it
32016-11-21 22:21:54 UTCclaysmalley are you sure it's 30 ways? i could only find 6 with that tag
42016-11-21 22:32:52 UTCmueschel Seems the other 24 are in Russia from another user... Strange that they appeared on the same day.
Thanks for fixing!
12016-11-21 10:18:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
this import added the misspelled tag "addr:postco" 9793 times. Could you correct this?

Jan
22016-11-21 12:46:03 UTCdan980-import fixed, thanks
12016-11-20 14:18:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325331151
The tagging seems to be wrong.
Cheers, Jan
12016-11-17 13:07:18 UTCmueschel Hi, you added 250 objects with the tag buf=y. Could you check this please?

Jan
22016-11-17 17:13:29 UTCmajkaz Copy-paste error (huts, it should be building:yes).
At the moment the corrected version should be loaded.
32016-11-20 12:12:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
thanks for correcting, but there is another bunch of 184 buildings with this tag, see:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kbU
I can correct them if you want me to do that.
Jan
42016-11-20 14:11:29 UTCmueschel Fixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43822584

Jan
12016-11-20 13:25:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found keys like BlockNumber, City, Neighbourhood and
Prefecture on many nodes in your changesets. These are not used in any other place.
Could you change them to the common tagging, i.e. addr:blocknumber, addr:neighbourhood, addr:prefecture and addr:city? These are the only tags that are un...
12016-11-20 13:18:42 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier sehr viele Tags verwendet, die sonst nirgends in Verwendung sind. Diese tags mögen eine gute Beschreibung der Objekte sein, sind für OSM aber nicht wirklich zu gebrauchen - keine Software ist in der Lage sie zu verstehen und entsprechend darzustellen.
Am besten schau...
12016-11-19 11:39:34 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast dich hier bei "source:maxspeed" einige Male vertippt, da fehlt das "o".

Gruß, Jan
22016-11-21 17:20:37 UTCsennewald63 Hallo Jan, danke dass du mir mal wieder über die Finger geschaut hast, Fehler ist behoben, hatte leider noch mehr Richtung Bregenz betroffen und die Zusammenarbeit von JOSM und overpass turbo war mal wieder toll.

Senni
12016-11-18 20:48:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tag "hgv:8t=destination" on this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154983499
This tag is not used in other places. Have a look at the :conditional syntax that is used to describe things like this. e.g. hgv:conditional = destination @ weight > 8

Cheers, Jan
22016-11-19 18:18:18 UTCOtnow Hi.
Thanks for the tip. Fixed.
12016-11-18 20:30:39 UTCmueschel Hi again,

On several of the objects you added, I saw tags like "Justice Hall = yes" or "Nasugbu Auditorium/Evacuation Center = yes". These tags can not be understood by software and should be changed to something else.
E.g. if it is the name of the object, put it to name=...\...
12016-11-17 19:02:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452966868
The tag "Carrera 99 =Calle 99" looks strange.

Jan
12016-11-17 18:58:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way has a strange tag, could you check that?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453076659

Jan
12016-11-17 13:10:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found some objects with many weird tags. like this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453608674
It doesn't look like these belong into the OSM database. Could you check this?

Jan


desa_2008=BANARAN
fid_admin_=317
fid_pl_340=5
hectares=659.321
kab_2008=GUNUNGKID...
12016-11-15 16:24:41 UTCliteran Hallo! Why this change (there is http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare on this page healthcare:speciality=trauma). It's important for me cause now I make presets set for JOSM, dedicated to healthcare.
22016-11-15 16:38:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
your tag was health_specialty:trauma=yes.
Using the scheme from this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0/Specialties - no version of 'trauma' is listed there.
I looked at Taginfo and found 'trauma' not being used, but 'traumatology' used 4 times. ...
32016-11-16 15:28:48 UTCliteran OK. Second one doesn't match here, cause it's not the emergency station, but Trauma point (Травмпункт) - in Russia it's 24/7 medical institution that cure only traumas.
12016-11-15 11:48:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the royal_cipher of this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/356800870

Jan
12016-11-15 11:45:11 UTCmueschel [sudo] password for root: _

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453021446
;-)
12016-11-15 09:57:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check these 44 buildings? The tag "addr:postcode" has a space in middle.

Cheers, Jan
22016-11-15 10:51:44 UTCJam_NOAH Just edited it all to 4231, postcode of Nasugbu. Thank you
12016-11-14 11:38:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 3 ways with non-english tags, like http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191558195
Could you check that? If it's the name of the road, put it in a name=* tag.

Cheers, Jan
22016-11-14 16:49:26 UTCMehrad77 Oh! I'm sorry! I will fix it right now
thanks!
12016-11-13 16:40:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
I noticed that you created many broken relations in your changesets.
If you want to add information like addr:street, make sure you add them to the building itself and do not create a relation for this.

Let us know if you need help!
Jan
12016-11-13 13:50:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw the tag 'motor vehicle = oneway' and 'cycleway = opposite' on two cycleways.
I think what you mean is
highway=cycleway (allows bicycles in both ways, but disallows motor_vehicles)
motor_vehicle:forward = yes (allows motor_vehicles in one direction only)

Could you verify this?

Ja...
22016-11-14 22:58:00 UTCHendrikklaas klopt
12016-11-13 13:39:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452547380?
These tags are not in use in other places:
bicross surzur \t=bmx bicross
bmx \t=trinité surzur bmx
terrain la trinité surzur =terrain de BMX

This might be a good description of the object,
but is no...
12016-11-13 13:35:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
these five buildings have many strange tags that should not appear in the OSM database. Also, they are located directly on a street according to aerial images. Could you please check and correct that?

Jan
12016-11-12 14:09:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag 'amenity_former' - this tag was not in use before. You can check in the wiki for common life cycle tag prefixes:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Cheers, Jan
12016-11-12 14:06:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 94 ways with the key 'railway:preseved' which should be spelled 'railway:preserved'. Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22016-11-12 15:40:43 UTCGilles Corlobé Hello,
I think I have corrected all the mistakes.
Sorry.
Gilles
12016-11-12 14:03:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found these two tags on a node
addr:housenumber \t2
addr:numberhouse \t8
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4492555389

Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22016-11-12 15:27:52 UTCAjBelnuovo Verified and corrected.

Cheers,Airton
12016-11-12 14:00:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
way 389961326 has the tag 'adpoted =no' that doesn't make sense to me. Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22016-11-12 14:56:29 UTCtrigpoint That looks like a typo, it should be adopted=no.
32016-11-13 14:22:08 UTCPaul Berry My mistake; thanks for correcting it, @mueschel.
12016-11-12 13:52:58 UTCmueschel Hi & welcome to OSM,
could you explain the tag "high bar = park yerushalaim (high bar)" you put on this node
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4491240300
This could be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it, if no common and well-...
12016-11-10 20:53:33 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was ist die Bedeutung von dem Tag "bicycle_ride =yes" am Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148862023 ? Das gibt es bisher nicht bei OSM.
Gruß, Jan
12016-11-10 16:06:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 172 objects with the wrong tag "builging" - could you check the changeset and fix this?

Thanks, Jan
12016-11-07 09:01:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
Could you check this way? It has many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451081268#map=19/42.69136/-71.06352
12016-11-06 21:03:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
I recently saw these tags from you:
destination:distance:ref:to
destination:to:distance:forward

Up to now we don't have an established syntax for distances given in destination tags. But, with respect to the ":to" you added, I think the correct tag (and order) is
destination:di...
12016-11-02 10:44:15 UTCsaikabhi Hello, I am seeing that your changeset has created duplicates of the features in OSM. Any reason as to why that happened? Can you please go ahead and review these changes and revert them?

Thank you,
Abhishek
22016-11-02 18:17:46 UTCkerrymapper Thank you for the heads up Abhishek. I exported this work as geojson in JOSM to validate it, and it appears to have duplicated everything when I re-uploaded it. I will use the reverter plugin to backtrack. It's not working for me right now, but I will fix it. I will just revert all, then revalidate
32016-11-06 16:03:16 UTCmueschel If you have trouble doing the revert, let us know. There are "experienced reverters" who know how to solve common problems.
12016-11-06 16:00:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw you put the tag "zip code" on many objects. This tag is not used in any other place. The common tag for this purpose is "addr:postcode". Would you mind changing your edits so that OSM can make use of your work?

Cheers, Jan
12016-11-05 15:40:53 UTCmueschel Warum hast du hier Unmengen an Objekten gelöscht?
22016-11-05 15:48:55 UTCPrince Kassad http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/473311
32016-11-05 15:50:15 UTCmueschel Und weiter? Dort wurde vorgeschlagen, access=* zu ergänzen. Deiner Meinung mit dem "wild im Kreis rumfahren" hat keiner zugestimmt.
42016-11-05 15:58:49 UTCPrince Kassad Doch, kaltuna hat vorgeschlagen, alles zu löschen. Und dann den Bug geschlossen so nach dem Motto "los, mach mal, nicht einfach nur faulenzen".
52016-11-05 16:00:40 UTCmueschel Bitte? Lies das nochmal.
62016-11-05 16:10:32 UTCPrince Kassad "Ich finde, daß Highway=Service alleine stehend vermieden werden sollte. Vor allem, wenn man eine Fläche damit taggt.
Frei zugängliche Flächen (z.B. am Frischezentrum) sollten meiner Meinung nach eher mit amenity=parking in Verbindung mit Access=* markiert sein. "

...
72016-11-05 16:18:30 UTCmueschel Da steht, du sollst es vermeiden und mit access ergänzen. Flächen auf denen gefahren aber nicht geparkt wird (z.B. am Frischezentrum dienen die meisten Flächen der Zufahrt und als Platz zum Rangieren für LKW) sind sicherlich nicht amenity=parking sondern highway=service.

Ü...
12016-11-05 12:51:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the keys 'foot:color' and 'foot:shape'? They have not been in use before. Maybe there is a better suited way of tagging.
Cheers, Jan
12016-11-02 10:45:12 UTCsaikabhi Hello, I am seeing that your changeset has created duplicates of the features in OSM. Any reason as to why that happened? Can you please go ahead and review these changes and revert them? Simillar issues also in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43337505

Thank you,
Abhishek
22016-11-05 12:45:05 UTCmueschel This seems to affect at least 10300 objects, possibly more.
32016-11-06 22:20:24 UTCkerrymapper I believe I was able to successfully revert these changesets to remove the duplications using the reverter in JOSM.
12016-11-03 11:43:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
on 50 of your ways I found the tag 'sarface', which is misspelled and should be 'surface'. Could you have a look and correct this mistake?

Cheers, Jan
12016-11-02 11:34:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node? It has the key 'name:marie' with a wikidata ID
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137504611
Cheers, Jan
22016-11-02 11:37:50 UTCescada Thanks for letting me know about this mistake. I dropped the tag.
12016-10-30 13:28:15 UTCmueschel Please do not use the OSM database for "search engine optimization".
All these tags on this POI are spam or do not follow common tagging
rules and should not appear in OSM:

legal expertise = Immigration, Housing, Employment
office = Legal Services
opening_hours = Monday-Thursd...
22016-10-31 16:14:59 UTCcatechin Hi Mueschel,

The intent was not to use this for search engine optimization but to provide for clear details on legal aid organizations so people can have clear knowledge of the organization they tend to visit. I can delete the tags you listed as spam. Thanks.
32016-10-31 16:27:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
thanks for the reply. Many users add information to OSM just to be visible in search engines, and your edit looked like one of those.

You don't have to delete this information, but it should be changed to standard tagging, e.g. opening_hours has a well defined syntax that can be understood ...
42016-10-31 19:37:09 UTCcatechin Hi Jan,
Amazing, thank you for the links. They are a great guide! I have changed hours to standard syntax. Let me know if I should change anything else. This is the first Legal aid organization in the San Francisco out of a longer list that I intent to add to the map.
52016-10-31 19:44:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
I see that you already made some changes.

I'd go for "office=legal" - this tag is used few times already.

Languages spoken can be tagged as follows:
language:en = yes
language:es = yes


And, because it has not been said before: Welcome to OSM! Feel free to contact me if yo...
12016-10-31 11:52:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of ways like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450091182

All keys in OSM have to be in English and use common values - otherwise they are of no use because no software can understand them.

Cheers, Jan
12016-10-31 11:49:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found some nodes with the tag 'manmade' - the correct spelling is 'man_made'. I just fixed that for you.
Cheers, Jan
12016-10-31 11:38:37 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2793193647
This tag looks a bit strange:
Prima H4=stele

Cheers, Jan
22016-11-02 08:17:38 UTCtartiflex It is fixed.

Thanks for your remark :)
12016-10-30 17:43:21 UTCuser_5359 Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether ...
22016-10-30 17:54:18 UTCmueschel I'm not the original creator of these nodes, just fixed some mistakes.
If you come to a conclusion regarding these uploads, please let me know.
32016-10-30 18:00:27 UTCuser_5359 Hello mueschel! Because I know you a german mapper, I will answer on german. Entschuldigung, dass ich den falschen Changeset erwischt habe. In Absprache mit der DWG werden die Knoten, die ich anmahne und nicht reagieren, nach einer Woche (oder später) gelöscht.
12016-10-30 15:50:27 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier einige Objekte getagged mit
power=substation
power_1=transformer
Keys mit einem '_1' sind normalerweise ungünstig, weil sie nicht ausgewertet werden. Laut Wiki ist an diesen Gebäuden das substation Tag richtig, und transformer würde an einem Objekt im Inneren ...
22016-10-30 16:45:06 UTCRGraefen mir ist jedoch keine andere Möglichkeit bekannt zu zeigen, dass in solch einer Trafostation abgespannt wird (von 20kV auf 380V) Als Primärfunktion ist "substation" natürlich erste Wahl, da gebe ich Dir recht
Grüße, RGraefen
32016-10-30 16:49:16 UTCmueschel Laut wiki ist das Umspannen eine primäre Funktion einer substation. Z.B. substation=minor_distribution von ~30kV auf ~300V
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dsubstation
"This kind of substation directly supplies households and small businesses with low voltage power (e.g. 40...
42016-10-30 18:58:58 UTCRGraefen na ja, einig sind wir uns ja in Bezug auf "substation", aber am Wiki müsste mal gearbeitet werden. In meiner mehr als 30-jährigen beruflichen Laufbahn habe ich jede Menge Schaltanlagen gesehen, gebaut und abgenommen, in welchen keine Transformatoren stehen, dies ist insbesondere ...
52016-10-30 20:49:43 UTCBeKri Naja, selbst wenn wir das Wiki ergänzen ...
Wie wollen wir "vor Ort" ermitteln WAS jetzt im Häuschen ist ?? Tür aufsprengen ?
Solange man kein "Insiderwissen hat" (welches aus meiner Sicht dann auch eher nix bei uns zu suchen hat)
ist so ein "Kasterl" ...
12016-10-30 13:35:14 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du das Tagging von diesem POI checken? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4467761490

Gruß, Jan
22016-11-02 19:10:02 UTCYokr Hi, ist "korrigiert". Danke für den Hinweis.
12016-10-30 13:26:19 UTCmueschel Hallo und willkommen bei OSM :-)
hier ist ein Kommentar zu deiner Buslinie: ÖPNV-Linien werden bei uns nicht als Weg eingetragen, sondern als Relation, wie zum Beispiel diese Linie hier:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6651116

Wenn du Hilfe brauchst, schau am besten mal im deutschsp...
12016-10-30 13:08:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/251257271

There are two restriction tags, one is misspelled. These restriction tags typically belong to a relation of type=restriction, but not on a node.

Cheers, Jan
12016-10-30 13:00:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
99 of your buildings have the misspelled tag "addr:poscode" instead of "addr:postcode".
Could you have a look and fix that?

Cheers, Jan
12016-10-30 12:52:16 UTCmueschel Please do not use the OSM database for "search engine optimization".
All these tags on this POI are spam or do not follow common tagging
rules and should not appear in OSM:
description = Carrie Rachel is a bonafide organizing expert. She’s ready to bring order and harmony to the...
12016-10-30 12:47:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47421778
I found the tag access:snow=destination on this way, which is not used anywhere else.
What do you think about this tag instead?
vehicle:conditional = destination @ snow
This uses the common conditional tagging. Could you confirm whether it is gene...
22016-10-30 22:47:01 UTCMax1234-ITA
Hi Jan,

about way 47421778: it's a narrow road, running down a hill with a quite steep slope: in case of snow, it becomes very dangerous for circulation.

The dangerous part begins only out of the village of Cella, so at the beginning of the road there's a sign indicating that access is reser...
12016-10-30 12:40:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
looking at the building you added here: It would be very helpful to stick with normal tags. E.g. all the opening_hour tags can not be understood by any software - they can be combined to one normal opening_hours tag.
'Personne de contact' is better written as contact:name or contact:person
'...
22016-10-30 13:27:47 UTCPierZen Hi Jan,
Thanks to spot this.
These tags have been added by the Potentiel 3.0 Field team that organized a UAV mission in this village. They took the time to add POI We are a team to support them at distance. This opening_hours does not look pertinent. I will remove.
12016-10-29 18:27:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
when adding tags, please check that there are no spaces in the key. Keys with spaces can not be used by most software.
Jan
12016-10-29 16:45:15 UTCmueschel Hallo,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377207296
Der Weg trägt das Tag
case_of_defence:aeroway = taxiway

Meines Wissens nach wurden diese Not-Flugplätze allesamt aufgegeben, werden nicht mehr gepflegt und verschwinden zusammen mit normalen Instandhaltungsarbeiten.
22016-10-29 17:18:48 UTCPeilscheibe Hallo mueschel,
ich habe die Objekte an der A 81 mit einem Prefix versehen, weil sie vorher als Flugplatz getaggt waren, was dort regelmäßig nicht der Fall ist. Das wurde bereits hier besprochen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34913935
Darüber hinaus ist mir das eigentlich...
12016-10-29 16:42:02 UTCmueschel Hi outing,
please check the tagging of your edits - some errors I already corrected but I guess there are more, e.g. on this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449554380
I found the tags
contact_we
contact_ph
addr_place
addr_postc
The values might be accurate but are not usable in OSM - ...
12016-10-28 11:01:50 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass das nicht die Namen der Gebäude sind. Vielleicht in einer note besser aufgehoben.
Gruß, Jan
22016-10-28 11:12:24 UTCgadacz Stimmt auch wieder, aber Note ist auch nicht optimal, ist ja eher für andere Mapper gedacht. rem oder description wären angemessener. Immerhin haben die Hütten etwas Bedeutung für nostalgische und Horrortouristen
32016-10-28 11:18:59 UTCmueschel Stimmt, es sollte description nicht note sein. Was ist rem? Da gibt es keine Beschreibung und findet sich auch nur 24 Mal in der Datenbank.
12016-10-28 11:14:49 UTCmueschel Hi Mathias,
there is a little typo on several ways:
maxpeed instead of maxspeed
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/jGt

Cheers, Jan
12016-10-28 11:11:24 UTCmueschel Hallo,
dir ist da ein kleiner Tippfehler unterlaufen, an einigen Wegen steht destination:int:ref mit : anstelle von _ in int_ref.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/jGs

Gruß, Jan
22016-11-04 07:57:55 UTCsennewald63 Hallo Jan,

danke für deinen Hinweis, habe es berichtigt.

Gruß, Senni
12016-10-26 19:22:38 UTCmueschel Hi Bogdan,
could you check the node again? Something went wrong there with the tagging, most likely a copy-and-paste error (or you like your name very much ;-) )

Btw, it's best to use the common syntax for opening_hours, this can be read automatically by software:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.or...
12016-01-09 19:55:17 UTCNakaner Mit deiner Trennung von Frankfurt (Main) Hbf in Nord- und Südseite bin ich nicht glücklich. Ich möchte dich daher bitten, deine Änderung an Node 205364328 rückgängig zu machen und Node 3933430459 wieder zu löschen.

Die Trennung ist rein leit- und sicherungstechn...
22016-07-16 15:46:29 UTCmartinum4 Hallo, wo kommen die railway:ref für die Energieversorgung/Das Umformerwerk von Borken(Hessen) [railway:ref=IFBOK] her?
32016-10-25 19:30:02 UTCmueschel Und noch etwas: Was ist dieses seltsame Tagging von highway=construction?
http://osm.org/way/378568539
Das hat jetzt zur Folge, dass die Straße von jedem Router als "frei" erkannt wird. Genauso die beiden überlappenden Wege in Gegenrichtung.

mueschel has contributed to 500 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 977 comment(s) (limit: 500 changesets)