Copyright © Pascal Neis (neis-one.org) - Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors (Data is updated every 30 min) - See latest OSM discussions - Legend: Discussion without an answer - RSS feed - Show only discussions without an answer
Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
63710299 by
Alan Bragg		12018-10-21 17:49:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added strange tags like "geoid10=120370004" to almost 1000 buildings. Looks like a mistake, could you check that?

Thanks, Jan
22018-10-21 19:44:16 UTCAlan Bragg Thanks, I'll get direction from project leader. This part of /tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/87#bottom
63695039 by
Dartmouthmapmaker		12018-10-20 14:16:23 UTCmueschel Please be so kind and stop your imports until you have solved the issues with misspelled tags.
There are hundreds of forests and rivers that contain the tag "addrcountry=Canada". Forests don't have addresses, and the tag 'addrcountry' doesn't exist anywhere else.
22018-10-20 17:02:23 UTCDartmouthmapmaker I did and the instructions and video state that addressing tags are essential in the place ways
32018-10-20 20:31:22 UTCmueschel I don't know which instructions and video you refer to, but I think you misunderstood something. All 'addr:' tags are put on things like buildings, POI, or nodes, but not on streets, rivers or boundaries. This might get 'is_in' tags like 'is_in:city' - but even that is not necessary as long as the c...
42018-10-20 21:03:10 UTCDartmouthmapmaker Streets and highways etc yes but not natural features JSOM does not know the difference when it auto completes them
52018-10-21 09:11:27 UTCmueschel JOSM is not "intelligent" in a sense that it can determine which tags fit and which don't. That's up to the person operating it.
63709048 by
Dartmouthmapmaker		12018-10-21 07:52:54 UTCmueschel If you insist on having these tags, could you at least fix the spelling mistakes of keys? Thanks!
63577154 by
mayi007		12018-10-17 10:29:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
please mind the correct spelling: It's "turn:lanes", not "turnlanes".
I fixed several right now, but maybe I missed some.
Cheers, Jan
22018-10-17 10:48:57 UTCmayi007 Hi mueschel,

Thanks for the Feedback and will ensure further.

While i am applying filters to figure out all such instances, let me know if there is any other way.

Thanks & Regards,
mayi007
32018-10-17 11:28:08 UTCmueschel You can use overpass-turbo for searches like this:

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/CPC
(it searches only in the visible area of the map)
63453762 by
petnga		12018-10-17 10:42:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some wetlangs with strange tags:
NomBasfond = Mardock
id = 5

Could you have a look and change these to common OSM tags?

Thanks, Jan
63578127 by
johanespeter9		12018-10-17 10:21:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found ~ 1200 times the key "addr:municipal" on your buildings - this is not used in any other place.
Could you change that to the common "addr:municipality"?

Cheers, Jan
63602348 by
jackson pascal hombo		12018-10-17 10:20:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found ~ 1200 times the key "addr:municipal" on your buildings - this is not used in any other place.
Could you change that to the common "addr:municipality"?

Cheers, Jan
63292634 by
opengislab		12018-10-16 13:13:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tags on these nodes?
- 'place' nodes usually don't have "addr:*" tags
- 'add_city' and 'addr_place' are no common OSM tags
- the 'editor' should not be tagged
63282100 by
Ricardo KOUAKOU		12018-10-16 10:49:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several POIs with a strange tag and a 'fixme' - if you don't know the proper key, could you also add a short description of the object? This can help others adding the right tagging - the name itself is not really sufficient.

Thanks, Jan
22018-10-17 19:56:29 UTCRicardo KOUAKOU Thanks Jan, i will do it next time and sorry for the hard job i left.
Jose Ricardo
63531158 by
Adrian Berner		12018-10-16 10:44:14 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier einige nicht-standard Tags verwendet,
- opening_hours hat eine genau definierte notwendige Syntax
- cuisine hat definierte Werte
- payment:* sollte ebenfalls nur die im Wiki gelisteten Versionen benutzen.

Bitte lies dort mal nach und passe das Tagging an.

Gruss, Jan
42578132 by
sushi_klaus		12018-10-14 11:08:28 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du hier mal einen Blick auf die beiden Notes werfen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1424405
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1424404
Angeblich ist diese Strecke offen und die andere geschlossen.
22018-10-21 16:13:57 UTCsushi_klaus Hallo,
zum Zeitpunkt der Änderung war der Zustand so wie in der Karte eingetragen. Da sich die Riedbergstraße damals in Bau befand, ist es sehr gut möglich, dass die beiden Notes zutreffen und die Karte abgeändert werden muss. Ich bin aber seit meiner Änderung nicht mehr v...
63433752 by
Dartmouthmapmaker		12018-10-13 09:40:42 UTCmueschel Please check your boundary imports:

- there are "type=land_area" tags on nodes
- there are misspelled tags like "addrcountry"
- there are tags like '_Shape_Area_=Yes' that definitely don't belong into OSM
- boundary areas usually don't have 'addr:' tags at all
63417343 by
Joelane Sinon		12018-10-13 09:34:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
OSM is not a place to just dump your shape files into. You have to follow tagging rules - and for larger imports also follow our import guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

As this import doesn't seem to contain any by OSM-standards valid informat...
63259578 by
amara12		12018-10-12 09:39:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "case=yes" to many objects. Could you explain what this means?

Thanks, Jan
63392630 by
DHuthmann		12018-10-12 09:30:18 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast 'disuse:' an einige Wege gehängt. Zum Einen müsste es "disused:" heißen - aber ich gehe davon aus, dass diese Wegstücke entfernt wurden, das wäre dann "razed:".

Gruß, Jan
22018-10-15 18:30:48 UTCDHuthmann Danke Jan!
Ich habe die Attribute wie vorgeschlagen angepasst!
63411925 by
das2		12018-10-12 09:25:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
please be careful with the spelling of tags: It's 'lanes', not 'lane'. I fixed 86 occurrences right now, but there might be more.

Jan
63179914 by
vichada		12018-10-12 09:19:46 UTCmueschel Hallo
kannst du uns das Tagging von diesem Knoten erklären? Da stimmt irgendwas nicht.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5952870255

Danke, Jan
22018-10-12 16:02:42 UTCvichada Hi Jan,
sorry that was a copy&paste error btw selected wrong object and paste - error.

Thanx for noticing - already fixed it ...
63158927 by
FredrikLindseth		12018-10-12 08:58:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag " doNotImportAddress = Bendixens Vei 49 5067 BERGEN" to http://osm.org/way/276959854

Could you check this?
22018-10-14 11:16:24 UTCØystein Bjørndal I removed the doNotImportAddress, it is originating from my Kindergarten-import page and should obviously not be imported. I am removing this tag from future datasets now.
32018-10-14 11:32:32 UTCFredrikLindseth ah, yes. This was a mistake. Thanks for removing it
63434864 by
amf9412		12018-10-12 08:41:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
tags like "addr:housenumber_24" are not used in other places. You can add several numbers to the same tag:
addr:housenumber = 10200;12001;13876 ...

Jan
63164004 by
osmviborg		12018-10-10 12:05:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? It got a strange tag, maybe its name?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/630275018

Thanks, Jan
22018-10-10 13:50:32 UTCosmviborg Grønnehavestræde, is the right name.
63146629 by
mga_geo		12018-10-10 12:03:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the new key "ref:fr:illenoo" on these nodes. In France, reference numbers are typically given with a key in captial letters, like "ref:FR:FANTOIR", see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=ref%3Afr

Maybe you want to change to "ref:FR:illenoo"?
63169615 by
Gooh Map		12018-10-10 11:57:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "stretch" to several ways. This is not used in any other place. What does it mean?

Jan
63146963 by
dansit		12018-10-10 11:56:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "sult=y" to 2 lakes - what does it mean?

Thanks, Jan
22018-10-10 12:31:50 UTCdansit Hello.
It's mistake. Should be salt.
It's salt-marsh
63325786 by
yopaseopor		12018-10-09 12:24:29 UTCmueschel Please stop this undiscussed mechanical edit until further discussion.
It breaks many cases of traffic sign tagging.
22018-10-09 14:09:48 UTCyopaseopor -This (non-mechanical) edition is not undiscussed.
This edition is about the discussion done in tagging list http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Re-Traffic-sign-direction-tagging-td5923137.html about the subkeys forward and backward (my favourite option, this was not an easy decision for me but I have p...
32018-10-09 14:32:08 UTCmueschel The discussion ended with your question about the change, not a single answer approving it. Mass edits should be announced and agreed on in a broader community, and not in the depth of a thread without anybody noticing.


You also edited ways with traffic_sign:* tags, where this scheme will not...
42018-10-09 17:45:27 UTCgeri-oc Also, the specification direction is correct only with degrees or compass. forward or backward is related to the direction of the path in OSM.

I am for a revert of these changes (worldwide).
52018-10-09 19:59:53 UTCgeow I asked the data working group to revert all changesets of user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/yopaseopor/history where the cS comment is: "#fastag #traffic_signs Apply traffic_sign:direction tag to avoid problems with new iD editor as an agreement on tagging list“

Thanks
geow
62018-10-09 22:24:04 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
63116121 by
zsolt d		12018-10-09 13:14:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of these "Csolnok" tags you put on some trees?
63272171 by
Der Troisdorfer		12018-10-09 10:51:16 UTCmueschel Something went wrong with this import of trees. 305 have very strange tags like the ones below.
The changeset is also missing the correct source of the import and a link to the documentation of this import.

Baeume_T_1=1138
Baeume_T_2=Troisdorf Waldfriedhof
Baeume_T_3=Friedhof
...
22018-10-09 11:50:20 UTCDer Troisdorfer Mein Englisch ist zu miserabel, um die Meldung im ganzen zu verstehen. Der "source of the import" ist - wie angegeben - das Städt. Baumkataster (von der Stadtverwaltung Troisdorf mir zur Verfügung gestellt).
Der Troisdorfer
32018-10-09 12:18:26 UTCmueschel Der Changeset hat nur 2 Tags, das Kataster ist nicht als Quelle angegeben:
created_by = JOSM/1.5 (14289 de)
source = Esri World Imagery

Üblicherweise werden Nutzungsgenehmigungen auch im wiki hinterlegt, damit andere die rechtliche Lage nachvollziehen können.

Und es gibt 300 Bä...
63125441 by
Shamillah		12018-10-09 11:03:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "incenerator" to serveral hospitals. There is no such word in the English language - could you check that?

Thanks, Jan
63273803 by
Yockie Taupan Putra		12018-10-09 10:53:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded 5300 ways with strange tags like

LAYER=Unknown Line Type
TASK=12

Could you have a look and remove all of these?

Thanks,
Jan
22018-10-12 08:42:47 UTCYockie Taupan Putra ok thank you,
63116789 by
look4book		12018-10-03 14:33:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "socket:tesla" on a charging station - there are two different Tesla sockets: socket:tesla_standard and socket:tesla_supercharger
Which one is it?

Jan
22018-10-08 08:00:09 UTClook4book the tesla destination charger at tarnewitz marina has 3 ports with type2 cables. one for the public, and two designated for tesla charging. so mapping them as 3 type2 ports seems misleading. what do you recommend?
32018-10-08 17:50:11 UTCmueschel Das ist schwierig... um einen 'socket' handelt es sich ja nicht.
Man könnte zwei POI machen, einen für den Tesla-Charger, einen für die beiden anderen. Und dann mindestens eine note erstellen - eventuell lassen sie sich auch über die payment-Möglichkeiten unterscheiden?
42018-10-09 08:29:56 UTClook4book Zwei POI - das machen wir besser nicht. Schließlich handelt es sich nicht nur um die gleichen Koordinaten, sondern um das gleiche Objekt. Nur mit 3 Anschlüssen. (Von denen nur einer von öffentlichem Interesse ist ;-) Payment unterscheidet sich scheinbar nicht: Hafenmeister fragen. so...
63107649 by
JJJWegdam		12018-10-07 13:10:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 2 ways with the tag " 70 = line_speed". Looks like a mistake, can you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22018-10-08 11:05:08 UTCJJJWegdam Hello,

That’s indeed a mistake. Could you provide the location of these ways?

Best regards,
Jeroen
32018-10-08 17:40:36 UTCmueschel http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%28node%5B%2270%22%5D%3Bway%5B%2270%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%2270%22%5D%3B%29%3Bout%20meta%3B
63235804 by
daFisch		12018-10-06 13:53:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are several (~10) roads here that got strange tags like "Rua Marquês De Sapuca = Rua Carvalho", along with a name tag.
For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631047560

Could you have a look and fix these?

Thanks, Jan
22018-10-08 14:51:45 UTCdaFisch Jan,

I am currently working to resolve this issue, but could you give me the specific roads? I already changed the road that you mentioned.

Thanks,

Nick
32018-10-08 17:40:02 UTCmueschel Currently I see 3 more, but maybe that's not all.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165762727
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165762390
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183872349
63115944 by
overflorian		12018-10-07 14:15:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of the key "substitution"? This is not used in any other place.

Cheers, Jan
22018-10-08 13:39:13 UTCoverflorian Hi Mueschel, this is a temporary tag.

I started a discussion on the french transport mailing-list to find the adequate tag to describe it; It means that alternative buses operated by SNCF stop to this bus stops when the trains do not operate because of an issue.

I will soon replace it with a m...
32018-10-08 16:44:31 UTCoverflorian Hi Mueschel, this is a temporary tag.

I started a discussion on the french transport mailing-list to find the adequate tag to describe it; It means that alternative buses operated by SNCF stop to this bus stops when the trains do not operate because of an issue.

I will soon replace it with a m...
42018-10-08 17:37:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
alright. I think the final tag should make clear whether this stop is used for busses replacing trains *only* or *in parallel* to being a regular stop.
52018-10-08 17:46:25 UTCoverflorian thanks for this suggestion, I will discuss it too with the mailing-list
63121312 by
literan		12018-10-07 13:13:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
the key 'vr=yes' is new - what does it mean?

Jan
22018-10-07 14:44:13 UTCliteran ha, it's my mistake. I meant virtual_reality=yes from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Damusement_arcade - will fix it
63062636 by
john paul jones & gringo		12018-10-07 12:00:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
what does 'Gates = yes' mean? If there is a barrier along the way, it should be tagged using "barrier=*" on a node at this place.

Cheers, Jan
63108288 by
ti-lo		12018-10-05 08:35:47 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier eine Menge Tags neu erfunden,
gibt es dazu auch ein Proposal und Dokumentation?
Ansonsten ist es eher ungewöhnlich, das komplette Sortiment eines Ladens zu taggen.

deli:sales = yes
deli:type = sauce;mustard;herb;spice;honey;pasta;rice
distillery:sales = yes
...
22018-10-05 19:05:36 UTCti-lo Aus welchem Grund sollte es ein proposal dafür geben ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like#When_to_create_a_proposal
"Unüblich" trifft sicher zu, ist allerdings auch ein unüblicher Laden, irgendwo zwischen deli und alcohol, aber keins von beidem wirklich....
32018-10-05 19:17:31 UTCmueschel Ich weiß nicht - willst du diese Menge an Tags an allen 250 Filialen anbringen? Da wäre ein Verweis auf z.B. wikidata eigentlich geeigneter.

Ohne Dokumentation wird diese Information wohl niemand auswerten und kein anderer Mapper genau die gleiche Syntax verwenden.
Z.b. wird statt de...
42018-10-05 21:41:40 UTCti-lo type kommt deutlich häufiger vor als die 22 "deli"-Einträge :
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=type
Ähnlich bei sales :
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=sales
Im Wiki wird immer wieder auf die Verwendung von taginfo verwiesen und bei verschiedenen tag...
52018-10-07 11:19:28 UTCNakaner @ti-lo Wie viele von den type-Tags in ihren x Varianten sind denn von dir erfasst worden? Ich vermute die meisten.
62018-10-07 12:05:27 UTCti-lo Wie wahrscheinlich ist das denn, das sind ein paar Millionen...
63033275 by
Mathias-S_import		12018-10-05 10:46:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node and its tags?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5938557797

Thanks, Jan
22018-10-06 23:18:54 UTCMathias-S_import Thanks for the heads up; it seems like the generated import doesn't handle airports properly. I've deleted the node - there's was already an airport node at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/877063434 - and I'll update the script generating the import files.
63046163 by
lyctkel		12018-10-05 10:43:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag 'recyling:fat' here - this is new. Did you mean 'recycling:cooking_oil"?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5939560751
22018-10-05 19:20:50 UTClyctkel Hi,
you are right. I hadn't thought of that tag.
It's corrected now.
Best Regards
lyctkel
63015610 by
barnes38		12018-10-04 11:00:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
I wouldn't invent a new tag here - you can use the established :conditonal syntax. Like:
lit:conditional = yes; no @ Mo-Su 00:00-05:00
Jan
63003094 by
dina606		12018-10-04 10:55:53 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM!
What is the meaning of the tag payment:transation_account? This is not used in other places. Please have a look to the Wiki to find out what common tags are:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment

Cheers, Jan
62999616 by
literan		12018-10-04 10:49:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this relation, the tag 'sasss' looks like a mistake.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7727637

Thanks, Jan
22018-10-04 11:45:48 UTCliteran hmm, strange bug. Fixed it, thnx!
62990173 by
vespax		12018-10-03 14:34:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "socket:tesla" on several charging stations - there are two different Tesla sockets: socket:tesla_standard and socket:tesla_supercharger
Which one is it?

Jan
22018-10-03 15:43:49 UTCvespax These are socket:tesla=destination according to what I proposed here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station/Tesla_Motors

There doesn't seem to be a good way to distinguish between supercharger and destination charger in OSM as the moment.
32018-10-03 15:47:16 UTCvespax https://www.tesla.com/findus?v=2&search=usa&bounds=39.092169266358795%2C-108.49970426409914%2C39.04305619028469%2C-108.6196097359009&filters=destination%20charger&zoom=14&location=dc30205
42018-10-03 15:48:40 UTCvespax https://www.tesla.com/findus?v=2&search=usa&bounds=39.092169266358795%2C-108.49970426409914%2C39.04305619028469%2C-108.6196097359009&filters=destination%20charger&zoom=14&location=dc30205

Here is link to charger locations on Tesla site.
52018-10-03 16:30:27 UTCmueschel There is a problem with this definition of the tag - the value in "socket:typeXZ" is already used for the number of sockets avilable (this is different from 'capacity'). If you extend the type of charger to the value you break this scheme.

If this is really a third type of charger (I do...
62018-10-03 20:18:45 UTCvespax Would you like to comment on that in the talk list? I'll make the changes to these, I'm ok with how you suggested.
72018-10-03 21:51:10 UTCmueschel I can, but could you clarify whether this is actually another type of socket? What I read is that they actually are socket:type2.
82018-10-03 22:13:28 UTCvespax The socket is not the same as a type2. It is specific to Tesla vehicles and only Tesla vehicles can charge with them. A type2/level2 charger can use an adaptor to charge a Tesla, but a Check Bolt can't use a Tesla destination charger. Here are two links that describe it.

https://en.wikipedia...
92018-10-03 23:34:05 UTCmueschel Read a bit further.... That makes it even more complicated - in Europe they seem to use Type2 connectors and some destination chargers can be used by other brands, but not all of them.

I guess this needs some broader discussion on the tagging mailing list and not just on a Talk page.
62964991 by
dansit		12018-10-03 17:41:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this building, it got a strange tag "addr:22 =muslim"

Thanks, Jan

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119566770
62976777 by
sustainablemapUCB		12018-09-28 08:41:56 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM!
Bitte nimm dir etwas Zeit, dich darüber zu informieren, wie das Tagging von Objekten in OSM funktioniert. Es ist nicht erwünscht, einfach neue Tags zu erfinden (wie die unten aufgelisteten), weil solche Informationen von keinem außer dir verstanden werden...
22018-09-28 09:15:35 UTCDD1GJ OSM ist nicht die Plattform für irgendwelche schnellen Ad-Hoc Projekte einer Erstsemester-Orientierungswoche. Zudem erfassen wir nur objektive Tatsachen und keine subjektiven Dinge eines Bewertungsportals. Zudem gab es mindestens folgende (unbeabsichtigte) Fehler. Ein Penny wurde 50 Meter weit ...
32018-09-28 13:55:34 UTCNakaner Hallo,

das sehe ich auch so. Darüber mangelt es den beigetragenen Daten an der erforderlichen Überprüfbarkeit, sie sind nicht objektiv, sondern subjektive Bewertungen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%9Cberpr%C3%BCfbarkeit

Ich stimme einem vollständigen Revert zu,...
42018-10-03 14:29:39 UTCmueschel Ich stimme euch da zu und habe gerade aufgeräumt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63162497
62932385 by
Zong Liang L		12018-10-02 13:09:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you just some unusual tags on these nodes. could you explain what they mean?
parking:additional \tD
parking:color \tblue
parking:type \tparallel

Thanks, Jan
63104977 by
rabeyroux		12018-10-02 11:32:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several objects with strange tags like "TEX10_id = Voie". Could you have a look and fix these?

http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%28node%5B%22TEX10_id%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22TEX10_id%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22TEX10_id%22%5D%3B%29%3Bout%20meta%3B
62908824 by
Robert46798		12018-10-02 10:47:28 UTCmueschel Hallo Robert,
bei den ganzen subkeys und suffixes bei Straßen (lanes, backward, symbol...) hat sich eine bestimmte Reihenfolge eingebürgert. An diesem Weg habe ich das gerade korrigiert - schaust du nochmal nach den restlichen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362759683
Gruß, Ja...
22018-10-02 19:39:22 UTCRobert46798 Hallo Jan,
danke fürs aufpassen. Eigentlich weiß ich das auch. Hier habe ich scheinbar nicht richtig aufgepasst. War auch meine erste Kreuzung mit destinations:lane. Das hat mich etwas gefordert. Anfang nächster Woche werde ich die Kontrolle schaffen.
Viele Grüße,
Rober...
63110126 by
gbragaalves		12018-10-02 08:04:33 UTCmueschel This changeset went wrong, it produced many nodes without any tags.
Please follow the import guidelines
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
63108637 by
gbragaalves		12018-10-02 08:03:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded 20700 objects with many strange tags like those below.
These don't look like they should appear in OSM.
In addition, this changeset is missing a link to the discussion of this import - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

ALTURAMEDI \t0.0
CULTIVOPRE \tEu...
63067563 by
ernestoandolfi		12018-10-01 20:41:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this waterway? It got many strange tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/629234624

Thanks, Jan
63037449 by
Noen		12018-10-01 20:40:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, it got many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5938872493

Thanks, Jan
22018-10-02 19:28:17 UTCNoen Seems like i created a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2069277537.
Duplicate deleted now.
62874047 by
moswalti		12018-09-30 11:14:33 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was meinst du mit "payment:bancomat"? Diesen Key gibt es so nicht. Schau doch mal im Wiki nach Bezahlmöglichkeiten. Wahrscheinlich meinst du "maestro", "girocard" oder allgemein "cards".

Danke, Jan
62845403 by
NetworkingTas		12018-09-29 16:46:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
the keys "trail class" and "Trail class" are not used in any other place. You might want to use "mtb:scale" or "class:bicycle:mtb".

Cheers, Jan
62819600 by
Crusier		12018-09-29 16:42:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
the use of "_temp" as part of a key is not common. There is "temporary:" as a prefix or "construction:" or "planned", depending on the actual status.

Cheers, Jan
63011935 by
ljubop		12018-09-29 12:04:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw you added the tag "name:sr-Latin" on 44 ways. The correct spelling would be "name:sr-Latn", without the 'i'.
Could you have a look and fix these?
Cheers, Jan
62817436 by
Amin Ghanbari		12018-09-28 11:04:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
some of these roads got some strange tags like

فاز = 11
محله = 5
ناحیه = 3
نام محله = آرمانشهر

Could you have a look and change them to common keys like those described in the Wiki?

Thanks!
62734304 by
PiskuEditor		12018-09-28 10:58:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tag "Air length"? This is not used in other places.

Jan
62764345 by
Axelos		12018-09-28 09:00:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
what does "doggy_bag" mean? Maybe "excrement_bags" (either excrement_bags = yes or vending = excrement_bags)?

Cheers, Jan
22018-09-30 06:30:37 UTCAxelos Hello,

It's error, I corrected.

Tank.
62694788 by
jlgenet		12018-09-18 15:05:50 UTCAlmtesh C'est ici la borne de recharge !
22018-09-18 18:40:44 UTCjlgenet Oui
Dons j'ai buger sur le commentaire... j'ai fait deux choses à la fois si je comprends bien !
32018-09-26 08:20:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of "Nb places" versus "capacity"? How many cars can charge here at the same time?

Thanks, Jan
42018-09-28 05:50:04 UTCjlgenet capacity : i understood kW
so, number of places = nb of park place
2 here
52018-09-28 05:51:55 UTCjlgenet I changed
capacity : 2
Nb places : Puissance : 22 kW
62018-09-28 08:14:38 UTCmueschel Very good. Just let me remind you that all tags have to be in English as they are described in the wiki.
So I changed the tag to "charging_station:output"

Jan
72018-09-28 08:16:23 UTCAlmtesh Le tag « Puissance » n'existe pas. Tu dois utiliser les tags dans le wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=charging%20station?uselang=fr), à savoir voltage et amperage.
Si tu veux de l'aide, n'hésite pas à nous partager une photo de la b...
82018-09-28 15:27:35 UTCjlgenet ok Thanks I'll remember
92018-09-28 15:29:01 UTCjlgenet OK pour les photos je me mets "doucement" à Mapillary
62676834 by
ZeiP		12018-09-27 10:48:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
these are 2 different tags - hgv:lanes allows to describe which lanes can be used by hgv, while lanes:hgv describes how many lanes can be used by hgv.
The version before this change was correct.

Cheers, Jan
22018-09-27 10:51:33 UTCZeiP Hmh, ok. Is this somewhere documented? I tried to find decent documentation on the correct tags, and the spec I linked was the only one I found. We should document it more thoroughly if there isn't documentation yet, because I'd guess I'm not the only one struggling with the definition.
32018-09-27 11:23:11 UTCmueschel Yes, documentation is kind of an issue. I started to write an own overview on street and lane tags here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mueschel/Straßeneigenschaften

I have to apologize that I didn't take the time to translate it to English yet...

62635377 by
paulbiv		12018-09-27 11:11:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
fhrs:businesstype is usually not added to OSM, was this a mistake?

Jan
62778277 by
berjk		12018-09-27 10:55:52 UTCmueschel Hallo,
die Angabe von "internet_access:dBm" macht wenig Sinn - das hängt vom jeweiligen Empfänger ab und ist keine unveränderliche Größe.
Und: was heißt internet_access:ratio ?

Gruß, Jan
22018-09-28 04:19:54 UTCberjk Hallo Jan,
ratio= ob der Konten immer online ist (100%).
dbm: Stimmt hängt vom Empfänger ab, aber man hat einen Richtwert, ob man ein starkes, mitteres oder nur ganz schwaches Signal hat.
Gruß Jürgen
62675818 by
DemoLogin		12018-09-27 10:52:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
what does "kettering=yes" mean? Did you mean "catering"?

Jan
22018-09-27 11:09:52 UTCDemoLogin Oh! Yes, I meant "catering".
32018-09-27 11:17:48 UTCDemoLogin Corrected that. Thank you.
62951123 by
Mory Touré		12018-09-27 10:40:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't add the tag "Username=Mory Toure" to everything you map. This can already be seen in the changesets and should not appear in the tags of objects.

Cheers, Jan
62839900 by
Kayla Colflesh		12018-09-26 18:11:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
do you have a written permission to use information from the McDonalds website for OSM?

Jan
62810454 by
zsolt d		12018-09-26 10:45:52 UTCmueschel Could you please check this waterway and adjacent ones? They got some strange tags
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320342100
Debrecen = -
Nagyhegyes = 180921

22018-09-26 20:26:25 UTCzsolt d Thanks! Now I have corrected it.
62917105 by
IceAgeMike		12018-09-26 08:09:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
OSM is not a good place for a collection of birthdays and death days. Please put such information to wikidata or wikipedia and put a link to these pages on the OSM POI.
Huge lists of death days just don't fit the purpose of OSM - collecting geo information.

subject:birth:1=1832-02-27
subj...
62873513 by
muindre		12018-09-25 08:45:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you point me to the documentation of all these new education* tags you added here? Without documentation the information can't be used by others.

Thanks, Jan
62871974 by
harofeasco		12018-09-25 08:45:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you point me to the documentation of all these new education* tags you added here? Without documentation the information can't be used by others.

Thanks, Jan
62873141 by
PEX PETER		12018-09-25 08:43:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you point me to the documentation of all these new education* tags you added here? Without documentation the information can't be used by others.

Thanks, Jan
62875912 by
njoki clareton		12018-09-25 08:43:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you point me to the documentation of all these new education* tags you added here? Without documentation the information can't be used by others.

Thanks, Jan
62873729 by
glamangie		12018-09-25 08:43:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you point me to the documentation of all these new education* tags you added here? Without documentation the information can't be used by others.

Thanks, Jan
62848626 by
mueschel		12018-09-24 16:26:04 UTCAndersAndersson Hello, Thank you for observing this.

i readded the ele tag and a source=survey since this is information regarding the crossing betweeen the two tracks.
22018-09-24 17:00:02 UTCmueschel Right, removing 'ele' was a mistake.
32018-09-24 17:01:15 UTCAndersAndersson No problem! Thanks for necessary cleaning.
62818427 by
kamirisam		12018-09-23 11:19:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you point me to the documentation of all these new education* tags you added here? Without documentation the information can't be used by others.

Thanks, Jan
62825096 by
Zong Liang L		12018-09-23 11:17:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of these uncommon tags?

line=solid
line_color=yellow
stopline=stop

Thanks, Jan
62831406 by
mueschel		12018-09-23 06:14:41 UTCCarnildo Actually, our most important job is to make an accurate map. Sure, deleting keyword-stuffing is satisfying, but translating it into OSM tags makes a better map.
22018-09-23 10:04:52 UTCmueschel What's the appropriate tag for "Our most important job is to recognize the needs and desires of every individual client and to strive to achieve these desired results."?
Essentially all these nodes are most likely spam created by some SEO companies - and I don't think we should support th...
32018-09-27 05:10:06 UTCfreebeer charlatan=mindreader .
how did this meaningless twaddle manage to get re-added yet again?
Updated indeed. Furrfu. Sun's not quite up and i already need another drink.
42018-09-27 09:03:26 UTCCarnildo I don't know about that one, but the Rusty Moose is a pretty clear "amenity=restaurant, cuisine=american".
32584679 by
mueschel		12018-09-22 19:07:33 UTCkreuzschnabel Hallo mueschel, Abbiegebeschränkungen wie http://osm.org/relation/5362261 finde ich nicht nur unnötig (Autos werden von funktionierenden Routern sowieso nicht auf Feldwege geleitet), sondern in solchen Fällen wie hier sogar falsch (weil auch Radfahrern das Abbiegen auf den Feldweg (un...
22018-09-22 19:39:15 UTCmueschel Hallo,
da muss ich dir leider widersprechen. Hier ist allen Fahrzeugen das Abbiegen nach links durch eine durchgezogene Linie verboten. Das gilt auch für Radfahrer, die hier keine legale Möglichkeit haben den Radweg zu erreichen.
32018-09-22 20:05:55 UTCkreuzschnabel Sehr ungewöhnlich. Aber dann nehme ich alles zurück :)
42018-09-22 21:58:19 UTCkreuzschnabel Zusatzfrage: Wär’s dir möglich, dich um https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1536993 zu kümmern? Brennt nicht, gibt keine Routingfehler :)
62592588 by
StKe		12018-09-18 10:51:53 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ich habe die 'socket' Tags hier gerade korrigiert - allerdings kommen aus einer Schuko-Steckdose keine 22kW - könntest du das nochmal überprüfen?

Jan
22018-09-18 11:24:17 UTCStKe Dort sind 2 x 22 KW und 2 x Schuko.

Jetzt weiß ich nicht, wie es richtig gemacht wird. Verstehe die Willi-Erklärung nicht ganz. Danach darf man nur die Anzahl angeben, die gleichzeitig geladen werden können. Aber, wenn zu den zwei Parkplätzen noch ein EBike lädt?
32018-09-18 11:34:11 UTCmueschel Ok, kannst du noch sagen, was das für Stecker bei den 22kW sind? Im Wiki sind ein paar Bilder dazu.

Die Zahl der Steckdosen (socket*) und die Kapazität (capacity) dürfen gerne unterschiedliche Werte haben. Aber unterstützt die Ladesäule auch 3 Benutzer gleichzeitig? u.A. ...
42018-09-22 13:56:30 UTCStKe 2 x 22 KW Typ 2.
52018-09-22 13:58:59 UTCmueschel Super, habe es direkt ergänzt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1599132653
62631439 by
JeroenHoek		12018-09-22 12:57:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? It got some foreign tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625930111

Thanks, Jan
22018-09-23 07:00:25 UTCJeroenHoek Fixed. These were left over from the boundary source.

Thanks for noticing.
62498045 by
Rps333		12018-09-17 10:51:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the 'disused' tag here? Something went wrong there.
22018-09-17 14:51:01 UTCRps333 Thanks. fixed. i think
32018-09-22 12:37:55 UTCmueschel Nope, the tag ist still there: "disused_ = amenity=fuel".
Am I correct, this gas station doesn't exist any more?
62668925 by
IceAgeMike		12018-09-22 11:26:48 UTCmueschel Hallo,
OSM ist nicht wirklich ein guter Platz für eine Sammlung von Geburts- und Todestagen. Dieser Knoten hier hat 40 solcher Tags...
Für so etwas sind Wikipedia und Wikidata wesentlich besser geeignet. Lege doch dort eine Seite mit Informationen an und verlinke sie hier.

subject10:b...
62605078 by
djakk		12018-09-15 10:58:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of "legal =motorroad"? What's wrong with the common motorroad = yes?

Jan
22018-09-16 09:49:56 UTCdjakk Hello Jan ! Yes I've just figured out a new tagging scheme about legal classifications : in France, there is "motorroad", there is also "motorway", and nothing, which I call "classic".
I thought it would be better than two keys, motorroad="yes" or "no&q...
32018-09-16 10:04:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
this scheme of motorroad / motorway / normal also exists in other places, and is exactly what motorroad = yes was invented for.
motorway-class has the tag highway=motorway.
motorroad-class has any highway tag plus motorroad=yes.
Everything else has just the motorway tag.

Changing a taggin...
42018-09-16 13:07:43 UTCdjakk I don't want to suppress any information and mislead the existing tools, so I won't touch to the existing motorroad="yes" or "no" (except the one I added a few days ago then I've changed my mind).
But yeah I want to evolve to a new tagging scheme : in France, and other european...
52018-09-16 13:12:43 UTCdjakk Legal=motorway can also be used for "half-motorway" of Switzerland, where the local community have decided to tag highway="trunk" the motorway with one lane per direction : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227963967
62018-09-22 11:23:15 UTCmueschel I'd like to ask you to discuss this tagging scheme on the tagging mailing list before you start adding it on a large scale. It's always better to have several opinions on a topic before doing a lot of work others might not like.
62799753 by
klain890		12018-09-22 11:15:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you invented many new tags here:

blockage_type=null
damage_type=null
deviceid=355785091843646
drain_point.altitude=1140.8
drain_point.latitude=0.25628
drain_point.longitude=32.63331166666667
drain_point.precision=0.8999999761581421
feature_type=ends

What do all of those mean? Could...
62799837 by
maxene eramil		12018-09-22 11:13:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 248 objects with the tag "buinding". Could you fix the spelling of "building"?

Thanks, Jan
62812591 by
Hendrikklaas		12018-09-22 11:11:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 54 buildings of yours with these tags:

building:le``=1
content=chickens
roof_shape=gabled

These should read
building:levels = 1
animal = chicken
roof:shape = gabled

Could you have a look and fix these?
Jan
10994894 by
mapmeld		12018-09-20 14:11:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
I know this is an old import, but could you comment on the tags on these bus stops? There are several which don't look like they should appear in OSM. Is there any way to change them to some common tagging scheme to make this information accessible by all our applications?

Cheers, Jan

For...
62620365 by
hutzii		12018-09-18 11:11:32 UTCmueschel Hallo,
für sowas haben wir schon einen eigenen Tag:
bulk_purchase=yes
Ich habe es gerade angepasst.
Gruß, Jan
62569316 by
Diego Gahn		12018-09-18 10:59:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tags you added to this monitoring_station are not common. Could you explain what this object does?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625469212

Thanks, Jan
62572411 by
Peilscheibe		12018-09-18 10:55:34 UTCmueschel Moin,
was heißt denn porch=yes? Den Tag gibt es so nicht.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/325155133
Gruß, Jan
62491688 by
l3BAM		12018-09-16 13:16:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
what does "recycling:cell" mean? This tag is new and not used in other places.

Jan
22018-09-17 08:16:13 UTCl3BAM Hi,
For me, it is a small battery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_cell#/media/File:Batteries_comparison_4,5_D_C_AA_AAA_AAAA_A23_9V_CR2032_LR44_matchstick-1.jpeg unlike an automotive battery. Usually, this container type does not received automotive battery. I wanted distinguished this...
32018-09-17 08:25:22 UTCmueschel There are 2 tags in use right now:
recycling:batteries
recycling:car_batteries

You can set the first one to 'yes' and the second one to 'no'.
42018-09-17 09:37:26 UTCl3BAM OK. I am sorry I had not found this tag. Both are recycled, sorry for my bad explanation. Fixed.
Thank you.
52018-09-17 10:05:32 UTCmueschel There's no need to apologize - nobody can remember all those tags :-)
62486996 by
AlaskaDave		12018-09-16 10:35:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
the key 'smv' is new... What does it mean?

Thanks, Jan
22018-09-16 13:25:00 UTCAlaskaDave Hi Jan,
Discussions of the tagging list are ongoing about how to tag slow vehicle turnouts. One suggestion was "smv" for slow moving vehicle". I think we've decided to use "slow_vehicle" as the tag. I will update this object once the decision is final. The thread is here:
...
32018-09-16 13:29:14 UTCmueschel Alright,

maybe this also falls into the category of a wide, paved shoulder? In some places they are built for exactly this purpose.
62482109 by
Geodyn		12018-09-16 13:14:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624681690
"ref:fr:" seems to be a mistake.

Jan
48316970 by
kogo		12018-09-16 12:20:39 UTCmueschel Hallo,
woher hast du die Namen dieser Gipfel? "P. 2349" ist nicht gerade ein gängiger Name.

Gruß, Jan
62469159 by
Djuan		12018-09-15 13:15:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag 'payment:e' on this node - this looks like a mistake, could you check it?

Thanks, Jan
62360191 by
Dartmouthmapmaker		12018-09-08 09:52:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added strange tags to 550 nodes, like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5889553759
They all got the same address and boundary tags which don't seem to belong there.
Could you have a look?

Jan
22018-09-08 12:21:01 UTCDartmouthmapmaker it was suppose to be deleted
32018-09-08 12:57:35 UTCDartmouthmapmaker I just re deleted it
42018-09-10 06:38:00 UTChighflyer74 Hi there!

There are still several nodes in the middle of nowhere. And a wrong tag A=administrative with those nodes. Check this https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/BLT

Thank you!
52018-09-10 10:34:50 UTCDartmouthmapmaker these are places in Nova Scotia and they real places they come from the government of Nova Scotia people live there they are administrative areas and they are not in the middle of nowhere
62018-09-10 14:16:23 UTChighflyer74 @Dartmouthmapmaker: you got my remark completely wrong... I am well aware of what Nova Scotia is and where it is and have been there a couple of times myself.

The reason for mueschel and me to contact you is the fact that on the ways you added there are tons of nodes which carry the same informat...
72018-09-15 11:40:15 UTCmueschel I removed the A=administrative tags including the other obviously wrong tags on 265 nodes. The issues with addr tags on boundaries, water areas tagged as place=village and a huge amount of overlapping nodes (1000 errors in JOSM) still exist.
82018-09-15 12:04:32 UTChighflyer74 Thanks mueschel!
62520717 by
Elham_Soltanzadeh		12018-09-15 11:20:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several boundaries here with the tag "left:quarter". This tagging scheme is not used in other places. Commonly, "name:left" and "name:right" are used.
In addition, a "admin_level" tag has to be added, most likely admin_level=11 in case of city...
62518563 by
mostafa yasavoli64		12018-09-15 11:08:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. Please pay some attention to the correct spelling of all tags. They must be spelled correctly, otherwise they can't be used by any software. In your edits I found various such mistakes:

Admin Level\t
Admin Level_
admin-lelel\t
admin-level\t
Admin_level\t
admin_levil\t
a...
22018-09-16 07:53:39 UTCSomeoneElse Hello,
Can you explain what "source=snapp" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625061040 is?
Best Regards,
Andy
32018-09-16 07:54:09 UTCSomeoneElse سلام،
آیا شما می توانید توضیح دهید که "source = snapp" در https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625061040 چیست؟
با احترام،
اندی
42018-09-16 08:25:52 UTCmostafa yasavoli64 سلام
مرز محله هست ومشترک بین دومحله ده حلاج وشهرک
52018-09-16 09:23:42 UTCSomeoneElse Thanks, but under what licence did "snapp" give you the neighbourhood information? Also, does this definition of a neighbourhood (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8682586 for example) exist as a legal subdivision or is it just a rough idea of the boundary?
62018-09-16 09:23:49 UTCSomeoneElse با تشکر، اما تحت کدام مجوز "snapp" به شما اطلاعات محله داده است؟ همچنین، آیا این تعریف محله (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8682586 به عنوان مثال) به عنوان یک زیرساخت قانونی وجود...
56876409 by
mapmakerwbd		12018-09-15 11:03:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
what does 'payment:Pin' mean? That's not really a common tag, only used in this city.

Jan
62550644 by
mapmakerwbd		12018-09-15 11:02:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
do you think it's really necessary to add a new key for every kind of giftcard from every individual shop?
I'd opt for either
payment:giftcard = yes (because it's obvious shops take mostly their own giftcards but no others)
or
payment:giftcard = C&A (which makes clear what kind it is an...
62574320 by
lovenes		12018-09-15 10:59:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added about 600 objects with the tag "addr:municipal" which should be "addr:municipality". Could you have a look and fix this?
Thanks, Jan
62593030 by
minnesotaGISer		12018-09-15 10:52:17 UTCmueschel It looks like this import of more than 2500 buildings went wrong.

a) The source of the data is missing. The discussion of the import is missing. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

b) All buildings have many foreign tags which shouldn't appear in OSM:
area=1508.789259...
22018-09-15 10:54:04 UTCmueschel and d) buildings that are obviously garages should not be tagged as building = house.
32018-09-17 13:58:03 UTCminnesotaGISer I apologize. I have removed all the building uploads.
57137985 by
miggru		12018-09-12 17:39:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this hydrant? It has two 'pressure' tags which is strange.
Cheers, Jan
62158221 by
Markwin		12018-09-01 16:50:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
you imported 47 ways with only foreign tags. Like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/621357345

Also, the source of this data is missing (it's definitely not Bing nor DigitalGlobe as you state) and a link to the discussion of this import is missing as well.
See https://wiki.openstre...
22018-09-06 17:55:09 UTCmueschel I removed these tags now. Waiting for a response about the validity of the source. These imports might have to be reverted if the source is not compatible with OSMs ODbL.
32018-09-12 13:05:12 UTCMarkwin Hi
Sorry for my late response. I got this from the Balai Besar Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Sumatera Utara (BBKSDA-SU) (https://bbksdasumaterautara.com/sm-karang-gadinglangkat-timur-laut/) data and coupled with Protected Planet database (https://protectedplanet.net/karang-gading-dan-langkat-timur-l...
42018-09-12 13:14:41 UTCmueschel protectedplanet.net explicitly states "no commercial use", so can't be used for OSM (unless you have a explicit written permission)

bbksdasumaterautara.com - I can't find some licensing terms, so we have to assume this can't be used as well.
62335284 by
Entur AS | Johan Wiklund		12018-09-11 09:51:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of the tag 'TBD:highway' you used on several ways here? If you're unsure a standard tag like 'fixme' would be useful.

Jan
22018-09-11 10:09:07 UTCEntur AS | Johan Wiklund "To be decided" in reference to my note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1516677. But you are right, fixme would be more clear. I will change it.
62458576 by
Галион54		12018-09-11 08:46:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Could you have a look to the service tags you added here? All tags in OSM should be in English - here you can find a list of the tags that are currently in use:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/service%3Avehicle#similar

Thanks, Jan
62258925 by
bigbug21		12018-09-09 15:42:58 UTCmueschel Hallo,
da du hier Videos von Youtube verwendest, nehme ich an, du hast dir vom Urheber der Videos eine Genehmigung geholt, dass du sie für OSM verwenden darfst? Es dürfen nur Informationen eingetragen werden, die unter einer mit der ODbL kompatiblen Lizenz zu Verfügung stehen, youtub...
22018-09-10 18:30:15 UTCbigbug21 Ich habe nicht das angegeben Videos kopiert, sondern -- neben Bildern, eigenen Aufzeichnungen, bing-Bildern und dergleichen -- als eine von vielen Quellen genutzt und damit ein neues Werk geschaffen und in OSM bereitgestellt.
32018-09-10 19:29:27 UTCmueschel Das wurde ausführlich diskutiert:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=620337#p620337
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2014-August/007979.html
42018-09-10 22:03:41 UTCbigbug21 Wie bereits dargelegt machen verschiedene Videos nur einen Teil der verwerteten Quellen aus. Dazu kamen Bing, eigenes Wissen sowie eigene Aufzeichnungen. Eine systematische Übernahme der Informationen aus nur einem Video erfolgte nicht, vielmehr wurden verschiedenste Quellen quasi als Inspirati...
62266083 by
Bernard59118		12018-09-10 08:35:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "Boucher=Yes", this is new and not used anywhere else. What does it mean?

Jan
62190537 by
Rally		12018-09-08 17:06:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
what does the tag "oln = y' mean on two ways here?
Thanks for explaining.
Jan
22018-09-08 20:07:34 UTCRally Obviously a typo. Sticky keyboard. Thank for pointing :-).
62264619 by
anurasi		12018-09-08 16:46:15 UTCmueschel Hi, the 'hmv' tag is new and undocumented. What does it mean?
Thanks
62404320 by
Rentner49		12018-09-08 15:24:10 UTCmueschel Wurden diese Gebäude abgerissen oder warum hast du sie gelöscht?
62369943 by
Hady Prast22		12018-09-08 10:38:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
you imported this way with many foreign tags, but no common OSM tags. Could you check and fix that?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/623792380

Cheers, Jan
62395099 by
aytfadc		12018-09-08 10:37:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag "name:ru_RU" is not used in OSM in other places. It's just "name:ru".
62172163 by
Cindy Franco		12018-09-07 17:40:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
you introduced a new tag here - "mapcraft:index". Could you explain what this means? Maybe there is an other, established tag for this purpose?

Jan
62187715 by
higa4		12018-09-07 17:38:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the new tag "morning=yes" on two cafes. What does that mean? Maybe breakfast=yes?
22018-09-07 22:34:07 UTChiga4 Thanks, you're right. Fixed.
62348517 by
Frozone		12018-09-07 11:54:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of tags. It's "backward", not "backwards".
I just fixed these mistakes.

Cheers, Jan
22018-09-07 15:59:53 UTCFrozone Hi Jan,
Thanks for your feedback and for fixing my mistakes. I will be more careful in the future, also please feel free to look at my other changesets and provide additional feedback!
Thank you,
Joey
62309284 by
justegabin		12018-09-06 08:22:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're using some strange tags in your edits:

opening_hours=24h/24h - opening hours has a well defined syntax. Without it can't be used by maps and other OSM-based services. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

heathcare:speciality=Medécine gén&e...
62314435 by
obone stephanie		12018-09-06 08:21:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're using some strange tags in your edits:

opening_hours=24h/24h - opening hours has a well defined syntax. Without it can't be used by maps and other OSM-based services. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

heathcare:speciality=Medécine gén&e...
62310966 by
gracegeo		12018-09-06 08:21:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're using some strange tags in your edits:

opening_hours=24h/24h - opening hours has a well defined syntax. Without it can't be used by maps and other OSM-based services. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

heathcare:speciality=Medécine gén&e...
62312949 by
gracegeo		12018-09-06 08:21:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're using some strange tags in your edits:

opening_hours=24h/24h - opening hours has a well defined syntax. Without it can't be used by maps and other OSM-based services. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

heathcare:speciality=Medécine gén&e...
62316250 by
EBENEZER ANGO		12018-09-06 08:21:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're using some strange tags in your edits:

opening_hours=24h/24h - opening hours has a well defined syntax. Without it can't be used by maps and other OSM-based services. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

heathcare:speciality=Medécine gén&e...
62312605 by
Ted Parfait ELLA ALLOGHO		12018-09-06 08:21:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're using some strange tags in your edits:

opening_hours=24h/24h - opening hours has a well defined syntax. Without it can't be used by maps and other OSM-based services. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

heathcare:speciality=Medécine gén&e...
62314982 by
MBA EKORE GUY Cardel		12018-09-06 08:21:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're using some strange tags in your edits:

opening_hours=24h/24h - opening hours has a well defined syntax. Without it can't be used by maps and other OSM-based services. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

heathcare:speciality=Medécine gén&e...
62312808 by
ISSALA		12018-09-06 08:21:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're using some strange tags in your edits:

opening_hours=24h/24h - opening hours has a well defined syntax. Without it can't be used by maps and other OSM-based services. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

heathcare:speciality=Medécine gén&e...
62233300 by
Joseph E		12018-09-04 09:30:26 UTCmueschel Please don't use OSM as a testing database - it is a world-wide used database that is now missing thousands of buildings. To test software, please use the development server:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_the_dev_server
22018-09-04 09:42:26 UTCmueschel This changeset was reverted in #62272269
62233643 by
Joseph E		12018-09-04 09:35:02 UTCmueschel This changeset was reverted in #62272112 .
61969315 by
Markus K		12018-08-31 15:11:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
schau doch bitte mal nach der Rechtschreibung - 'height', nicht 'hight' an 8 Objekten.

Gruß, Jan
22018-09-04 05:49:37 UTCMarkus K Hi Jan,
danke für den Hinweis. Hast du das korrigiert? Ich finde über eine overpass Abfrage keine "hight" keys in diesem Änderungssatz.
P.S.: Meine Rechtschreibung ist nicht dran schuld, sondern eine fehlerhafte JOSM-Vorlage, die einen "hight" Wert erzeugt. Ich h...
32018-09-04 08:42:08 UTCmueschel 8x 'proposed:hight' waren noch übrig, die habe ich eben gerade korrigiert.
Gruß, Jan
42018-09-04 12:29:52 UTCMarkus K Ok, nach dem key habe ich nicht gesucht ;-)
Und in einem älteren Änderungssatz in Walldorf-Wiesloch habe ich es auch noch gefunden, ändere ich dann heute Abend
61990602 by
cepesko		12018-09-03 11:16:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, the tag "ffe = 2 kn" looks like a mistake:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5739544647

Cheers, Jan
61959422 by
Triple7		12018-09-03 11:14:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added two tags here:
capacity = 40
chargepoints = 2
What is 'capacity'? Can 40 cars charge in parallel?
Could you check the wiki and see if you can add a 'socket' tag as well?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Jan
62224197 by
JoeG		12018-09-03 10:45:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag excavation=qanat_shaft on 1500 nodes - are there really so many, few meters apart? Or was this a mistake?

Jan
22018-09-03 11:17:09 UTCJoeG Hi Jan,
Thanks for checking. Yes, they're every few metres because they're used for the construction of the underlying tunnel.
However, the proposal for this feature is only now being commented on the tagging mailing list.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Qanat
Feel free to ...
61933903 by
Essin		12018-09-02 17:47:16 UTCmueschel "place = peninsula" is used 200 times, why not to use this quite common tag instead of a new one 'locality:type' is not used in any other place.

Jan
22018-09-21 17:25:52 UTCEssin I just reverted to a previous tagging without considering how established it was, but you're right, place=peninsula is a better syntax. I've changed it again.
61908382 by
booktiger		12018-09-02 14:38:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way has to tags 'protect_class'. Could you check that?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/614666060
Thanks!
61908133 by
Gazer75		12018-09-02 14:23:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check this node? It got several foreign tags, which don't seem to belong to OSM:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5850562108

Jan
22018-09-02 15:13:51 UTCGazer75 Thanks for spotting that one. Somehow a duplicated node got left behind and JOSM validator never warned me.
62133329 by
tishva		12018-09-01 16:53:01 UTCmueschel Hi
welcome to OSM!
you used many non-standard tags in your edit, for example:
Building condition:=good
Number of beds:=12
Number of floors:=1/2 floors
Number of rooms:=2 each villa
Number of staff:=2
Roof materials:=corrugated iron
total capacity:=5 each

This might be a good description ...
61873753 by
danctc		12018-08-31 16:08:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of 'treadmill=yes'? This tag is not used anywhere else.

Thanks,
Jan
62092713 by
Ibraham adriennne		12018-08-30 18:24:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check your tagging and mapping?
a) all tags you use must be those defined in the Wiki or available as presets in your editor - everything else, including tags with spelling mistakes, can not be used by any software and can not be displayed e.g. on maps.
number of beds=2
num...
62089642 by
assenizator0		12018-08-29 08:00:12 UTCmueschel Hi,you added tags like 'name:loc' on severzl objects - could you check the wiki about common name tags? Typically the tag is 'loc_name': https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
22018-08-29 11:47:23 UTCassenizator0 it's not a mistake. I know about another method of tagging, but it led to errors and I had to think, after analyzing the situation, to improve the tagging when processing the stack of names.
32018-08-29 12:44:37 UTCmueschel Namesare something very important, so that any change in tagging should be discussed in a large group. Are you aware that the normal tags can easily be found by all OSM-based search engines, but the new ones are almost invisible to every user, because software doesn't know about them.
Please write...
62092363 by
STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER JULIENNE		12018-08-29 09:19:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. Please have a look to the Wiki to learn about common tags for objects. You have to use those defined in the Wiki to make sure all users can understand them. The spelling is especially important!
E.g. this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435590939/history doesn't have any ...
62024531 by
Hendri Guswanto		12018-08-29 09:15:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? It has several strange tags:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620221937
62011595 by
aytfadc		12018-08-29 08:02:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node? Something went wrong with the name tag. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5859329755
22018-09-01 05:47:55 UTCaytfadc Corrected
thank's
61943417 by
ma-rt-in		12018-08-29 06:45:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
schau bitte mal nach diesem Knoten, '21=1' ist wohl ein Fehler.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/291770980

Gruß, Jan
22018-08-29 08:23:50 UTCma-rt-in Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. Ist korrigiert.
lg
61816212 by
Vache Meuh		12018-08-28 12:54:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/609174326
What does the tag "removing = yes" mean? This is new and undocumented.

Thanks, Jan
61997923 by
syrilltheartist		12018-08-27 10:55:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
you invented some new tags like "building:rowhouse" and "building:house". These are not documented - what do they mean? Did you check the wiki how buildings are commonly tagged? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building

Jan
22018-08-30 06:22:11 UTCsyrilltheartist thank you for your concerned ms/mr. mueschel I wil fix this a soon as possible
62006220 by
osmaccount		12018-08-26 15:02:16 UTCmueschel Hallo,
diese Kreuzung ist jetzt leider etwas defekt.
z.B. Von West nach Nord müsste man jetzt eine Spitzkehre fahren, was z.B. LKWs nicht schaffen würden. Und aus dem Rosenweg kommt man auch nicht mehr geradeaus - ein Navi würde jetzt "rechts abbiegen, dann sofort scharf links...
22018-08-27 20:03:27 UTCosmaccount Vielen Dank für das Feedback, hat mir sehr geholfen! Habe die Vorschläge nun umgesetzt.
61822688 by
Jontteli		12018-08-26 14:40:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the tags "was:website" and "were:website"? These don't really make sense to me.

Jan
61981026 by
mueschel		12018-08-26 14:36:00 UTCParsamparham Fix access please
22018-08-26 14:37:18 UTCmueschel Please be a bit more precise. What is the problem with the current access tag? These were not added by me.
32018-08-26 14:39:13 UTCParsamparham Current access tag
42018-08-28 04:10:42 UTCDiógenes de Sinope Hello Parsamparham and mueschel, I wanted to chime in on the access tags that I added to the ways in question in this changeset

mueschel, you will have to excuse me for not resolving and getting back to you on the issue brought up in the following changeset [ https://www.openstreetmap.org/change...
61152903 by
mattmaxon		12018-08-25 10:10:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added this area with many foreign tags that don't look like they belong to the OSM database. Could you fix this? Additionally, the source you state "Digital Globe premium" is clearly wrong - were is your data from?

Jan
61971627 by
Eric AGBE		12018-08-25 09:58:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these 38 nodes don't have any useful OSM tag, and two of them are located in the middle of the ocean. Could you have a look and fix these nodes?

Jan
61786179 by
Svein Olav		12018-08-24 10:17:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 3 relations for lakes with rather strange tags like
1354 = 1306
ele =\tViktjønn

Could you check that?
22018-08-26 17:59:37 UTCSvein Olav Thank You.
61804737 by
ThomasØderud		12018-08-24 09:47:56 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check this island and its name? Something went wrong with copy and paste there.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172562552

Cheers, Jan
61800436 by
bau-lau		12018-08-24 09:42:57 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du hier ein Bild des Schildes zeigen? Auch mit den Schilder-Nummern ist mir nicht wirklich klar, was da ausgeschildert ist:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5842253779

Gruß, Jan
61751772 by
Douglas Henrique		12018-08-23 11:02:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "avg_speed" several times - there is no such tag in OSM. Did you mean maxspeed?

Jan
61757585 by
legendval		12018-08-23 10:50:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5838942693

It has several tags that are not used on any other object in OSM.

Jan
61903887 by
MapIsLife		12018-08-23 10:41:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like this import of nodes went wrong. There are no useful tags on any of the nodes. Please also read the OSM Import Guidelines
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
61577710 by
KKS		12018-08-22 17:41:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "foresty_compartment" to several areas. Please note the spelling - 'forestry' would be correct.

Jan
22018-08-23 11:07:34 UTCKKS oopps. Sorry I will fix it ASAP.
61871791 by
F-5 System		12018-08-22 17:40:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw you added several tags like "compartment:(E)" - it's uncommon to have parentheses in keys and other people used tags like "compartment:SW" before. Could you have a look and change these?

Jan
61707194 by
Dona123456789		12018-08-21 13:52:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several ways with strange tags like "KeyController = 4". Could you explain what these mean? Please remember, the main OSM database is not a place to play with data - use the development database instead.

Jan
61693353 by
Gillyhtfc		12018-08-21 13:42:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
what does the tag "accessible toilets = yes" mean? Is it "toilets:wheelchair"?

Jan
61667577 by
Heinz06		12018-08-21 13:19:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du diesen Knoten mal überprüfen, der Tag "amenity_w =dismount" scheint ein Fehler zu sein.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4582274670

Gruß, Jan
22018-08-21 13:38:59 UTCHeinz06 Ja, danke - habe ich entfernt.
61589555 by
chris-ren		12018-08-13 12:08:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found some unusual keys in your edits.
- "repair:bicycle=yes" -> usually "service:bicycle:repair = yes"
- the 'name' tag is not an actual name, but a description and should be put to the 'description' tag.
- 'repair:computer' -> 'computer:repair', see https://wiki...
22018-08-13 13:03:05 UTCchris-ren Hi.

This kind are workshop can't be considered as a shop or linked to craft. It's a free place where people are repairing for a null cost differents objets. It's "repair=assisted_self_service". Maybe it can be considered as a service.

The node is different from the one of the place, ...
32018-08-13 13:14:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
I didn't mean you should tag it as craft or shop - I just linked to this wiki page because of the list of 'repair' related tags.
As SomeoneElse commented, have a look at taginfo, e.g. search for 'repair' and look through the list of repair-related tags
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search...
42018-08-13 13:50:49 UTCchris-ren Ok.
I'll changed with service:bicycle:repair=yes and computer:repair=yes.
Regards.
52018-08-19 20:44:58 UTCchris-ren Hi,

In fact service:computer:repair=yes seems to be better, because it's done same way as "service:computer:repair". I'll do this way for all attribute to be coherent.
62018-08-21 13:08:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
there's now service:computer and service:computers - could you change to one common spelling?
61756642 by
ernestoandolfi		12018-08-19 11:03:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 3 ways like this one without any valid tags.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617693077

Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22018-08-19 14:24:35 UTCernestoandolfi Hi. Thanks. They are streams. I found the second but not the third.
Can you help me with the link?
Thank you. Cheers Matteo
32018-08-19 14:33:38 UTCmueschel Here it is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617872009
42018-08-19 14:43:30 UTCernestoandolfi Made. Thank you.
61793449 by
blumerl		12018-08-19 14:07:04 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier den Knoten mit einer Adresse gelöscht. Möchtest du damit sagen, dass es hier keine Hausnummer 10c gibt?
Jan
61775015 by
rivermont		12018-08-19 11:01:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
are these poles for telephone lines? The tag "telephone=pole" is already used 930 times.

Jan
61575005 by
Polyglot		12018-08-18 14:06:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "onewa = permissive" twice - should this be a 'access' tag or is it some other kind of mistake?

Cheers, Jan
61739465 by
Said Mahfoudh Said		12018-08-18 10:48:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "addr:municipal" to many buildings. The correct spelling is "addr:municipality". Could you have a look and fix this?
Thanks, Jan
61739401 by
Paschal M		12018-08-18 10:48:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "addr:municipal" to many buildings. The correct spelling is "addr:municipality". Could you have a look and fix this?
Thanks, Jan
61738640 by
Rashidi Shabani		12018-08-18 10:47:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "addr:municipal" to many buildings. The correct spelling is "addr:municipality". Could you have a look and fix this?
Thanks, Jan
22018-08-18 12:28:07 UTCRashidi Shabani Ok am going to correct it.
61738827 by
Pwayne		12018-08-18 10:46:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "addr:municipal" to many buildings. The correct spelling is "addr:municipality". Could you have a look and fix this?
Thanks, Jan
61739002 by
Mc abich		12018-08-18 10:46:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "addr:municipal" to many buildings. The correct spelling is "addr:municipality". Could you have a look and fix this?
Thanks, Jan
61738476 by
Richardhusna		12018-08-18 10:46:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "addr:municipal" to many buildings. The correct spelling is "addr:municipality". Could you have a look and fix this?
Thanks, Jan
61739513 by
Erick minja		12018-08-18 10:46:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "addr:municipal" to many buildings. The correct spelling is "addr:municipality". Could you have a look and fix this?
Thanks, Jan
61648711 by
ampak		12018-08-16 10:50:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded several nodes without any valid tags. For example this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5831633859

Please have a look and fix this.
Jan
61455342 by
DENelson83		12018-08-15 14:48:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
is this a letter box belonging to houses nearby? This can be tagged as amenity=letter_box instead of post_box:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aamenity%3Dletter_box

Jan
22018-08-15 15:21:28 UTCDENelson83 It's a community mailbox, where mail for multiple addresses can be picked up. That fits the definition of "amenity=letter_box", so I have just changed it to that. Thank you for the suggestion.
61636006 by
abdurohman		12018-08-15 14:46:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tags 'dirtype=1' and 'type=*' on 26 objects. These are no common tags - could you explain what this means or remove them if they were added by mistake?

Thanks, Jan
61664140 by
Алекс Мок		12018-08-15 14:44:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "building_levels" on 500 buildings. The correct spelling is "building:levels". Could you have a look and chang this tag?

Thanks, Jan
22018-08-15 14:51:25 UTCАлекс Мок Ok. Thanks,excuse me.
61657205 by
Arvenia		12018-08-15 14:42:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
you introduced several new tags here, like
'service:computers:repair'. We should stick to already established tags instead of inventing new ones. E.g. computer:repair=yes or electronics_repair=computer.

See also this discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61589555
61547791 by
Jorieke V		12018-08-11 10:01:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used a new key here, "is_in:LGA" - what does 'LGA' stand for?

Jan
22018-08-15 13:36:59 UTCJorieke V That is one of the lowets admin areas in Nigeria - Local Government Area
32018-08-15 14:36:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
there is already a variety of is_in:* tags. Usually a generic term is used and not a name specific to the country. What about
is_in:county
is_in:subcounty ?
61336438 by
rurseekatze		12018-08-11 10:44:18 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du verwendest hier "population:check_date", üblicherweise wird aber "population:date" verwendet. Würdest du das anpassen?
Gruß, Jan
22018-08-13 19:06:34 UTCrurseekatze Hallo Jan,
danke für den Hinweis. Da bin ich wohl mit population:date und check_date etwas durcheinander gekommen. Ich habe es in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61635886 korrigiert.
Gruß
Alex
61297134 by
Eltatet		12018-08-11 10:30:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I have to remarks here:

- you added the tag 'recycling:m' - seems like there are a few letters missing, could you check that?
- opening hours have to use a well-defined format so that they can be understood by software. Have a look to the Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap....
61512753 by
Jack the Ripper		12018-08-11 10:15:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used two new tags here, 'payment:peach_pass' and 'payment:nc_quick_pass'.
The keys '...peachpass' and 'NC_Quick_Pass' are already used in a few spots. Could you make sure that we use the same spelling in all cases?

Thanks, Jan
22018-08-12 05:49:04 UTCJack the Ripper Hi Jan, the earlier keys were my doing, and are likely the incorrect ones. Georgia definitively puts a space in the name, so it is "Peach Pass" and not PeachPass (like Florida's SunPass without a space). And since nothing else is capitalized in tag value fields (the credit card is writte...
61452313 by
rn tech 1		12018-08-11 10:07:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM! Please have a look to the wiki how tagging of indoor features like rooms work:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_Mapping
Adding 'building' tags and invent new keys like "Level 3" or "building_1" for rooms doesn't work.
Also, please don't change e...
61451581 by
rntech		12018-08-11 10:06:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM! Please have a look to the wiki how tagging of indoor features like rooms work:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_Mapping
Adding 'building' tags and invent new keys like "Level 3" or "building:levels_1" for rooms doesn't work.

Cheers, Jan
61186849 by
Azam Firdaus		12018-08-11 10:05:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM! Please have a look to the wiki how tagging of indoor features like rooms work:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_Mapping
Adding 'building' tags and invent new keys like "Level 3" or "building_1" for rooms doesn't work.

Cheers, Jan
61522895 by
Crisfel Gerola		12018-08-11 09:59:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
please make sure all the tags use the correct spelling - the slightest mistake makes them unusable for any software.
Could you fix these:

roof materials -> roof:material
wall materials -> building:material
-
name=residential house
Please don't use such names. The name tag is f...
61527544 by
grueneberg		12018-08-10 19:10:56 UTCmueschel Hallo,
OSM ist kein Platz für Werbung. Solche Aussagen wie "Unsere Barkeeper freuen sich jeden Abend." gehören hier nicht hin. Die restlichen Angaben scheinen aber alle in Ordnung zu sein.
Nur die Telefonnummer sollte im internationalen Format mit "+49..." angegeben w...
22018-08-13 12:50:51 UTCgrueneberg Dies war mein erster EIntrag danke für die Hilfe und Informationen LG Peter
61248171 by
Diógenes de Sinope		12018-08-10 08:19:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
"public transport" corresponds to the key "psv" (if taxis are included) or "bus" (if taxis are not included). That means these two tags are correct:

bus:lanes:conditional = |||designated @ (Mo-Fr 05:00-22:00)
access:lanes:conditional = |||no @ (Mo-Fr 05:00-22:0...
22018-08-10 08:20:24 UTCmueschel Addendum: 'hov' are private cars, but with more than 1 (or 2) passengers.
47170249 by
MichaH		12018-08-09 08:17:52 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ich habe von dir mindestens 2 Frisörsalons gesehen wie diesen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4755950443

Mit den Tags female=no, male=no und unisex=no wüsste ich nicht, wer da noch hingehen darf.

Gruß, Jan
22018-08-09 14:27:27 UTCMichaH Umm keine Ahnung, das muss eine Voreinstellung von vespucci-Vorlagen (gewesen) sein, bei der ich dann übersehen habe, die Werte zu ändern.
Vermutlihc ist unisex=yes richtig, aber das ich heute nicht mehr mit 100% Sicherheit sagen.
Gruß, Micha.
32018-08-09 14:45:55 UTCmueschel Ja, sieht wirklich so aus. Wir haben 229 davon weltweit.
61380650 by
mueschel		12018-08-08 21:44:02 UTCSelfishSeahorse Hi
Please have a look at <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets#Gender_neutral_toilets>. Because unisex=yes has been used as a shortcut of female=yes + male=yes, this tag doesn't necessarily imply that the toilets are gender neutral.
Regards
Markus
22018-08-08 22:27:26 UTCmueschel I wasn't aware of this discussion. To me the outcome of this discussion, as summarized by Rory, is "unisex is well defined" https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2018-April/080596.html

'unisex' was always defined as something non-segregated. If you see a reason to introduce a ...
32018-08-09 06:50:40 UTCSelfishSeahorse Some other people came to other conclusions:
'If most existing data is using unisex to mean "there are both male and
female toilets", then it doesn't matter one bit what the wiki says.' (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2018-April/080599.html)
Even the iD editor lets you o...
42018-08-09 08:25:31 UTCmueschel Usually we try to start a project to clean up existing data if we find a problem how a tag has been used in the past.

If you feel the urgent need to add a new tag, feel free to do so. But note that this still requires to check all "unisex" tagged objects, whether they used the actual de...
61402865 by
7andbo		12018-08-08 11:06:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please explain the meaning of these two objects? They don't have any common, documented tag.

Jan
61436076 by
SiiG		12018-08-08 11:00:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "ref:FR:Commune" several times - I would like to point out that the correct spelling is "ref:FR:commune". Could you have a look and fix this?

Thanks, Jan
22018-08-08 12:08:40 UTCSiiG Hi,
Thanks for this information.
We're doing all necessary for the next updates.
Thanks, SiiG
61302491 by
ParkerKK		12018-08-08 09:06:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 9 ways with strange imported tags like these:

bike=No
bri_name=SC1
bridle=Yes
buckeyetr=Yes
l_feet=250.021933922728
l_mile=0.0473526390005167
label_name=SC1
pri_use=Bridle
res=South Chagrin Reservation
seg_type=CM Hiking
surface...
61396725 by
wyo		12018-08-07 13:26:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1366636639
There are 2 clearance_width tags.

Jan
61409319 by
fatoudembele		12018-08-07 13:22:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded several relations and ways like this one without any valid tags. Could you check this?

Thanks, Jan
61382381 by
Зелёный Кошак		12018-08-07 10:57:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw that you added several tags like "name:de:alt" - the correct tag is "alt_name:de", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
61369953 by
rn tech 1		12018-08-06 10:52:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many non-standard tags to these buildings, like these:
building:levels_1 = 1
building:levels_2 = 2
building:levels_3 = 3
building_1 = Tandas Perempuan
building_2 = Tandas Perempuan
building_3 = Tandas Perempuanm

If you want to map features inside a building, pleas...
61244024 by
Hendrikklaas		12018-08-04 16:59:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
what does 'strawler' mean? Did you want to write 'stroller'?
61272848 by
harrija0		12018-08-04 16:56:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612079015

What does 'w=no' mean?
22018-08-04 16:58:03 UTCharrija0 Walls. Must have hit tab before it populated.
61242385 by
Gregorio Garretón		12018-08-04 16:55:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of tags you put on several buildings?
propietario = Canepa
rol = 23-5
zona PRC = ZCHAL-B
zona alturas PRC = V2
Please spend some time reading the Wiki or browsing the presets in your editor to learn which tags can be used to describe objects.
61304606 by
Accord2		12018-08-03 17:09:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 40 tags like "numeric=maxspeed=120". Could you have a look and fix these? Thanks, Jan
61304629 by
Moepswa		12018-08-03 17:08:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many objects with tags like
Completed=y
id=5
Could you explain what they mean? Please have a look to the Wiki or the presets in your editor to learn how objects have to be tagged to be usable in OSM.

Jan
61308014 by
Sowa1980		12018-08-03 17:07:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
I would like to point out that the correct spelling of "facad" is "facade". Would you mind changing the keys?

Thanks, Jan
22018-08-07 11:45:05 UTCSowa1980 Спасибо , понял поправлю, спасибо что уточнили, как правильно.
61229325 by
DoktorKalle		12018-08-02 19:59:36 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM. Bitte nimm dir etwas Zeit und lese im Wiki, welche Tags Objekte in OSM bekommen müssen, damit sie von jeder Software und anderen Usern verstanden werden. tags wie "typus = bluehwiese" sind nicht dokumentiert und sind deswegen ziemlich nutzlos.

Gruß...
61166030 by
Mathias-S_import		12018-08-02 16:32:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5793931032
There are several foreign tags and no physical OSM tag.

Jan
61259990 by
Supaplex		12018-08-02 07:34:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag 'post_box:mouth' is new - could you explain what it means?

Thanks, Jan
22018-08-02 08:20:23 UTCSupaplex If the postbox has two mouth, one for local mailing or outside counties. Or just one mouth for all.
32018-08-02 08:47:04 UTCmueschel I guess you are looking for post_box:apertures
61259798 by
sydaziz		12018-08-02 07:31:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of keys - they are case sensitive. E.g. 'Water' should be 'water' Could you fix this on 114 objects? Thanks!
22018-08-02 17:05:23 UTCuser_5359 Hello, I have modified your keys from Water to water. But please have a look on the three ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612982305 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612982328 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612982315 : You use the key combination natural and highway. A road around the ...
61269735 by
Gregory_M-NCPPC_Import		12018-08-02 07:29:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these objects? Many got a 'saddr:stat' tag.

Cheers, Jan
22018-08-02 12:40:55 UTCGregory_M-NCPPC_Import Hello,
Thanks! most have been a typo when trying to type addr:state. I will fix that asap

Gregory
32018-08-02 12:52:23 UTCGregory_M-NCPPC_Import The tags have been updated in changeset: 61297285

Thanks again for bringing this to my attention.
61218062 by
Your Village Maps		12018-08-02 07:28:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several long notes to all these objects - this information doesn't belong there, but to the changeset. Could you have a look and remove those tags? E.g.

important_note=DigitalGlobe-Standard lines up best and image quality is good; Bing is the most current but does not line up well;...
22018-08-03 22:16:14 UTCYour Village Maps I have taken care of it.
61234901 by
mueschel		12018-08-01 00:41:16 UTCDr-Mx Should this tag have been changed to 'wikimedia_commons'?
22018-08-01 10:29:01 UTCmueschel Sure... I corrected so many auto-completion mistakes so I started doing my own. Thanks!
61096502 by
LafarM		12018-07-31 16:03:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the 'colour' tags on this relation? There's a 'colour:red=...'.

Jan
22018-07-31 18:24:54 UTCLafarM Hi
Thank you. I have modified this tag on correct.
Rafa
61045561 by
Spectrokid		12018-07-29 12:31:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the name of this farm?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/610692055

Jan
22018-07-30 12:22:37 UTCSpectrokid It matches the name SDFE gives, but I don't have local knowledge.
32018-07-30 14:36:05 UTCmueschel Have a closer look, there is no name tag, just something that went wrong during copy and paste.
42018-08-01 06:18:16 UTCSpectrokid fixed
61061615 by
DoctorSpeck		12018-07-29 12:26:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 2 ways with only foreign tags - could you check that? E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/610846391

Jan
22018-07-31 08:05:10 UTCDoctorSpeck Thanks for the heads up.
Fixed in changeset below:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61219011
61020177 by
5R-MFT		12018-07-29 12:22:57 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check the tagging? 'adjust=2' looks like a mistake.

Jan
61150718 by
flierfy		12018-07-29 12:06:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added sevetal tags like gauge:proposed here. 'proposed' is used as a Prefix, like 'proposed:gauge', but not as a suffix. Could you have a look and change these tags?

Cheers, Jan
22018-07-29 12:32:13 UTCflierfy Thank you for this hint. I just changed it.
With regards,
Stephan
61016004 by
PT-53		12018-07-28 15:57:41 UTCmueschel Hallo,
schaust du diese Wege nochmal an? Der richtige Key ist 'maxspeed:type', nicht 'type:maxspeed'.

Gruß, Jan
22018-07-28 17:01:17 UTCPT-53 Hallo Jan,
da habe ich wohl etwas verdeht.
Habe es "gedreht".
Danke und Grüße
61122877 by
xztraz		12018-07-28 15:31:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't add any tags like "hashtags" to any object in OSM. Could you have a look and remove them?
Thanks, Jan
22018-07-30 18:07:22 UTCxztraz yeah. got it wrong. i cant find the tags so someone seem to have fixed that. is there a way to add a atag to achangeset afterwards its pushed? did a lot of drawing but missed the detail about adding the tag to the changeset.
60954240 by
nw520		12018-07-27 19:09:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag 'traffic_signals:a' twice - could you check that?
22018-07-27 20:59:51 UTCnw520 Hello,
actually I added these tags on purpose since I wanted to indicate that these traffic signals have a "Angemeldet" indicator for busses (https://www.nordbayerischer-kurier.de/sites/default/files/user_uploads/051016wittek.006.bushaltestelle.jpg_0.jpg). I'm not sure whether there's alr...
32018-07-28 14:13:18 UTCmueschel Hallo, verstehe. Allerdings sollte ein Key erklärend sein und nicht ganz so kryptisch. Außerdem sollte er nicht vom Symbol abhängen. Anderswo wird ein S oder ein blauer oder weißer Punkt verwendet.
Bis jetzt gibt es da noch kein Tag dafür. Wenn du allgemein angeben wills...
42018-07-28 14:41:01 UTCnw520 An einem traffic_signals:bus=yes würde mich stören, dass dieser Tag nicht spezifisch genug wäre und auch zu einer Busampel passen könnte. Könntest Du mir vielleicht Deine Meinung zu diesen vorläufigen Vorschlägen geben:
a) traffic_signals:bus=yes - ganz allgemein,...
52018-07-28 15:30:24 UTCmueschel c und e sind, denke ich, in Ordnung. Allerdings gefällt mir das "signed_in" nicht wirklich. Vielleicht eher etwas wie "override_indicator"? Es geht ja nicht um das Anmelden, sondern um die Beeinflussung des Ampelzyklus. Oder irgendetwas im Sinne von "Vorrang"?
62018-07-28 16:38:10 UTCnw520 Okay, danke schön. Ich übernehme dann soweit
traffic_signals:bus:override_indicator=white_s für die bestehenden 2 Vorkommnisse. Demnächst müsste ich wohl dann auch in der Mail-Liste oder im Wiki ein Proposal starten.
72018-07-28 16:43:07 UTCnw520 Pardon, meinte natürlich traffic_signals:bus:override_indicator=white_a
82018-07-28 16:50:15 UTCnw520 Overpass-Abfrage: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ACS
60959722 by
michalfabik		12018-07-27 19:14:13 UTCmueschel Could you check the tags on this plane?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5777579564
22018-07-27 20:33:32 UTCmichalfabik Fixed. Thanks for pointing it out.
60924654 by
mike9531		12018-07-27 19:01:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded several residential areas with strange keys like 'Pro_Code'. Could you check and fix that?
Jan
61087363 by
Maddie Back		12018-07-27 15:52:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM! Please take your time to learn about common tags in OSM. You used for example "Room", "Room #", "Room Type", "room type" - all of these are not documented and not usable by any software.

Jan
22018-07-27 17:03:36 UTCuser_5359 Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_Mapping#Tagging ! Don't add new keys for room number (see ref). And are all rooms on the same level?
60896406 by
jendrusk		12018-07-25 10:27:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
these nodes all have two strange tags:
src_send_d=2018-07-19_09-55-31
src_sender=546

I guess these where uploaded by mistake?

Cheers, Jan
22018-07-25 10:37:56 UTCjendrusk Hi Jan
They were not :)
Objects were collected and sent to me using foreign software (StrazakOSM) - those are date of receiving and anonimized user - kind of foreign key for me. If something is wrong with this data I can find where they came from.
Cheers, Andy
32018-07-25 10:41:50 UTCmueschel Hi Andy,
in general, such personal information that is not useful for anybody else should not be part of the tags of a node. You can add this information to the changeset - you can still search for this information but it doesn't bloat the main objects database.
42018-07-25 10:54:37 UTCjendrusk Yes, I know and I have to think out something else, but as for now that's how this software works. I'll change it if I'll have some free time.
52018-07-25 11:09:33 UTCmueschel Ok. How about changing to a normal "source:XYZ" tag then? 'src_' is not used for anything else in OSM.
62018-07-25 11:14:52 UTCjendrusk Yes, it will be prettier and good solution for walkaround but still it will be "personal information that is not useful for anybody else". I have to face it my side - maybe by adding osm id's to my objects...
60842194 by
Toni Serra		12018-07-24 13:40:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tags like "Cal Tacanet = Graves i excavacions Castellot SA" you added? These are not common, maybe we can find a documented tag to describe these features?

Jan
22018-07-25 09:41:43 UTCToni Serra Hi
It is a mistake, it is corrected. Thank you
32018-07-25 10:24:22 UTCmueschel Perfect. Here's a second one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608985481
50947147 by
ElliottPlack		12017-08-14 11:35:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of 'eruv' on this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513968801

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-14 14:56:41 UTCElliottPlack Jan,

Sure, an eruv is a physical object that serves as a symbolic boundary in the Jewish Orthodox faith. Read more:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv

There isn't a great tag for this yet on OSM, so I added this under the premise of the "Any tags you like" principle (http://wiki.opens...
32017-08-14 15:13:16 UTCmueschel Alright, I haven't seen this before.
I see one potential problem with the tagging: A barrier=* implies an access restriction, by default access=no. So, if anybody by mistake adds a common node with any highway, routing engines might think traffic is blocked.
I don't think we have a proper tagging...
42017-08-15 02:48:02 UTCElliottPlack Jan: I'm glad that you found this and commented. I think your idea is superb. I was trying to decide if I should use an existing key like barrier but you make a good point that it could be interpreted by a routing engine as a generic barrier. Better to start something totally fresh.

What do you t...
52017-08-15 18:42:39 UTCmueschel ':' versus '_' - there is no functional difference between the two. Usually, ':' is used for subkeys, e.g. a key that further describes the main key, e.g. 'capacity' and the more specific 'capacity:disabled'. The underscore is more used like a replacement for a space as in "internet_access"...
62018-07-24 13:20:07 UTCElliottPlack Thinking back on this, what do you think about having eruv=rope, eruv=wire, versus eruv=yes paired with eruv:type=rope or wire. Tags like barrier and highway have their 'type' as the tag name.
72018-07-25 06:58:41 UTCmueschel Hi Elliott, this should be fine too. You can still add tags like "eruv:something = this" later on if you feel a need to add more details.
61027840 by
Олег 2199		12018-07-25 06:43:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these hydrants? They got several tags in Russian instead of the normal English ones, for example:
Инв. номер=863
Информация=Отсутствует
ПЧ, в чьём районе:=RU-KHA-21-99
Собственник=Завод алюминие...
60819527 by
samuelrussell		12018-07-24 13:48:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 'accepts' tags are new. I guess one of them can be changed to 'capacity' and one more to 'count'. For deposit return machines we do have a vending_machine tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending=bottle_return

Cheers, Jan
61000603 by
yopaseopor+catastro		12018-07-24 10:32:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain those "2017:" tags on this area?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/214787644/history

It's not common to put a year in front of any tag. If the parking is gone, the tags can be deleted. If it's important information, the "was:" prefix could be used.
22018-07-24 12:22:19 UTCyopaseopor It is easy, it is like the was prefix but with the exact information of year. It is important because this fact will change the life of all the city (this was the only free fee parking beach and it is well-know from about all the region). Even there is some TV program with the new beauty beach zone....
32018-07-24 12:54:16 UTCmueschel This scheme is undocumented and introduces a huge amount of new keys with impact on all data users. Please make a proposal for this new scheme and get the opinions of other mappers.
42018-07-24 12:59:25 UTCuser_5359 Please have a look on taginfo https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=2017 . There are guys with the same idea of a timeline, but they use the date as a postfix.
60956026 by
escada		12018-07-23 12:57:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these strange tags on this school look like a mistake:

HN_MAX = 12.21
HN_P99 = 11.13
H_DSM_MAX = 34.57
H_DSM_P99 = 33.49
H_DTM_GEM = 22.36
H_DTM_MIN = 22.11
auto_building = school
detection_method = from existing OSM building source: school ,hits (1)
size_grb_bu...
22018-07-24 03:40:12 UTCescada Hallo Jan,

it's indeed a mistake, I removed them. Thanks for letting me know !

regards
60922834 by
Justin Taylor		12018-07-23 12:43:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded several boundaries with just foreign tags - could you have a look and fix these tags?
E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/609649838

Thanks, Jan
60839192 by
Sint E7		12018-07-21 10:18:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check your "zone:De Lijn" keys (and similar ones)? The correct spellin is "De_Lijn" with an underscore instead of the space.
Cheers, Jan
60862852 by
Juline LEBRUN		12018-07-21 10:17:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
please have a look to the Wiki to see how sports pitches have to be tagged. For example, you used:
Sport =Soccer

The correct tagging would be: leisure=pitch sport=soccer

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sport

Cheers, Jan
60891294 by
momo14		12018-07-21 10:09:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you have a look to these address tags? I doubt that the village / zones are really called "Other" here.

addr:settlement=Other
addr:zone=Other
addr_settlement_other=Palorinya
addr_zone_other=Zone 1

Cheers, Jan
60892075 by
momo14		12018-07-21 10:07:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
in this import you used several unusual tags which should be replaced by documented tags. For example:

addr:settlement -> addr:village
chambers -> toilets:num_chambers
source_version -> source
gender_use -> female, male, unisex

Would you mind changing these tags to make thi...
60715212 by
Nodrog1061		12018-07-18 10:33:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "left only" on this way - what is the meaning of this?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15422269

Cheers, Jan
60780055 by
andresaldas		12018-07-18 09:58:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
In addition, the spelling of tags has to be right - the slightest spelling mistake makes the data unusable.

Tags like "tiempo" and "estado agriet...
60805503 by
xcs1230		12018-07-18 09:43:55 UTCmueschel Please don't use the OSM database for testing - this data is used by many people world-wide and is not the right place to make any experiments. Please use the development database for this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing

60794571 by
mueschel		12018-07-17 12:59:27 UTCczubi Hallo mueschel,
nur mal rein Interesse halber, war das vorher falsch oder war es unüblich oder ...?
22018-07-17 13:34:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
'razed' wird als Prefix verwendet, nicht als Suffix.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Technisch gesehen wäre "razed:watermill" also korrekt. Da dieses Tag aber höchstwahrscheinlich so exotisch ist, dass es kaum einer auswertet habe ich mich für da...
32018-07-21 09:07:38 UTCczubi pefix... ja klar... Danke für's einbessern.
60721009 by
vorpalblade77		12018-07-17 10:39:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
in the revert you re-added several tags with spelling mistakes:
state:rout,state:route,state_route
Should we change them to one common spelling? What is the meaning of these?

Cheers, Jan
22018-07-17 11:29:50 UTCvorpalblade77 Honestly, when I was reverting 57870860, I just kept the tags that were existed prior to that changeset and any tags that existed in that changeset that didn't conflict.

It looks like they can be removed, since they are the only existences of those tags.
60699367 by
ansuta		12018-07-17 10:30:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 2 "building:levels:undergorund" tags here - could you check which one is right?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61589560

Jan
22018-07-17 12:49:10 UTCansuta Hi. I took the Spanish Cadastre information and now I see that forgot to delete the tag 1 "building:levels:undergorund". Anyway, when I go to the hospital (I visit it regularly) I'll see better. Thanks for your feedback.
60586004 by
SSR_317		12018-07-15 11:56:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag "bridge=truss", "truss=..." are not common. There is another approach for tagging these traffic signs already in use (2000 times):
man_made = gantry
gantry:type = ...

There is no proper documentation available, but at least it is in use.

https://wiki.openstre...
59642929 by
Manjurul Islam		12018-07-15 11:41:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several objects with just one tag:
"CDRT=yes". Could you explain what this means?

Thanks, Jan
60578253 by
marc1978		12018-07-11 13:45:04 UTCdikkeknodel Hallo Marc,
Ich schaue mir deine Änderungen an weil du ein Review gefragt hasst. Ich denke das seht gut aus. Normalerweise würde ich auch ein Parkplatz bei ein Ladegerät erwarten. Soll dort vielleicht auch noch ein Parkplatz gezeichnet werden?
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
22018-07-15 11:24:05 UTCmueschel Hallo,
die Arten der Stecker die du hier und in anderen Changesets verwendest sind nicht die in OSM üblichen Namen. Schau doch mal bitte ins Wiki und übernimm die Namen von dort:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:socket

Gruß, Jan
60707791 by
clementroux		12018-07-15 11:01:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "charging_type" on these nodes - this tag is new and not used in other places. Essentially this information is not needed, because it can be read from the "output" tag.

On the other hand, one important piece of information is missing: Which sockets are ...
22018-07-17 09:53:00 UTCclementroux Hi,
I forgot to say it, but this was a semi-automatic changeset from opendata source. So I don't have other information about the sockets. I tried to "translate" all the present tags from the original dataset, this is why I added the charging_type tag (I didn't notice that it was readabl...
60691709 by
RoadWarrier		12018-07-15 10:59:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key 'isin' on 126 buildings. Is that "is_in:city"? But there is also an "addr:city" which is different. Could you have a look?

Jan
60621642 by
cammace		12018-07-12 09:25:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tag "tract_geoid=48201311700" you added on 850 buildings? This looks like a mistake to me.

Jan
22018-07-12 13:08:53 UTCcammace The building geometries came from the Bing Buildings footprint. I specifically used the files produced in this process https://gist.github.com/iandees/a5ab382a13099bfad615d213ec588e6a.
32018-07-12 13:16:46 UTCmueschel The geometries look fine, but I think that this tag shouldn't be there.
57308071 by
willmmm		12018-07-12 11:47:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't add 5 landuse and 7 leisure tags to the same object - this is not how OSM works. If you want to add e.g. a baseball court, you have to add an additional object for this and use the tags that are defined in the wiki.

Jan
60469414 by
Geodyn		12018-07-12 10:53:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
The tag "ref:fr:" looks like a mistake.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605638611

Cheers, Jan
60624005 by
lmason_aph		12018-07-12 09:29:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the key "indoormark:" 123 times in these edits - note the ':' in the key. I guess you wanted to use "indoormark" without the ':'. Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan
60528988 by
A~nest		12018-07-12 09:27:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added tags like "osmid=535911046" on many buildings. This looks like a mistake. Could you have a look and fix these issues?

Thanks, Jan
60599345 by
mspray3		12018-07-12 09:27:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added tags like "osmid=535911046" on many buildings. This looks like a mistake. Could you have a look and fix these issues?

Thanks, Jan
60634492 by
Reynald0		12018-07-12 09:23:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. In your edits I saw many tags that are not common. Please have a look to the Wiki and learn about which tags can be used to describe objects. Only then the information is usable by any kind of software. Also, please take care about the spelling - this is very important. I found ...
60574138 by
mspray9		12018-07-12 09:20:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
I noticed a spelling mistake on these objects: The key is "building", not "biuilding".

Please have a look and fix these 648 objects.

Cheers, Jan
22018-07-12 13:06:43 UTCmspray9 Hi Jan, Thanks for flagging this. The typo has been corrected. Cheers!
60545121 by
gadacz		12018-07-09 17:15:44 UTCmueschel Hallo,
hast du eine Genehmigung die Daten dieser Seite für OSM zu verwenden? Ich kann keinen Hinweis auf Nutzungsbedingungen finden.

Kurzzeitige Sperrungen (hier nicht mal 2 Monate) sollten auch nicht durch Änderungen der access-Tags eingetragen werden, sondern z.B. mit https://wiki.op...
22018-07-10 04:41:03 UTCgadacz Danke für den Hinweis. Gerade weil ich zum Verfahren unsicher war, habe ich Prüfung erbeten. Die Daten zu den Baustelleb werden über diverse Medien/Portale vom Bundesverkehrsministerion via BAST herausgegeben.
Danke for den Hinweis auf "temporary" Genau das habe ich gesucht...
60450145 by
ggando_lyft		12018-07-09 15:59:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several wrong tags regarding lanes here and on other streets.
E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/417198049

- If there is only one lane in forward direction, turn:lanes:forward = left| can't be right, because this implies two lanes (unless there is something like a bicycle lane)\...
22018-07-09 21:37:15 UTCggando_lyft Hi Jan,

Thank you so much for your feedback. I have made the necessary changes and am reviewing my past lane tag edits to ensure that they are properly tagged.

Thank you again for your feedback I appreciate the ability to create the highest quality contributions to OSM.

Best regards,
G...
60334944 by
Ajmal Takhnikyar		12018-07-09 10:43:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used tags like these (here and on other roads)
carriageway width, carriagewaycamber, carriagewaywidth, These are no common tags - could you explain what they mean? Maybe we can find a common way to tag those features.

Cheers, Jan
60420220 by
mattmaxon		12018-07-08 11:55:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "lanes:center" on few roads. This tag is not used in other places.
If there is a center turn lane, this is commonly tagged as
lanes:both_ways = 1
turn:lanes:both_ways = left

Cheers, Jan
60080140 by
christian shadrack		12018-06-23 16:52:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
this looks like an import of at least 82 schools.
The source you give ("ESRI") is obviously wrong. Where can we find the obligatory description of this import?

Also, all these nodes have many strange tags which don't look like they belong in the OSM database like these:
Capac...
22018-07-08 11:52:14 UTCmueschel I removed those tags and fixed the spelling of e.g. "source". https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60507474
60459502 by
A~nest		12018-07-06 10:41:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added keys like "osmid=535929240" on many objects. Could you check this? This tag looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22018-07-06 11:26:00 UTCA~nest HI Jan,
Thanks for the heads up. Those were by mistake yes. Is there an easy fix than reverting the whole changeset? The updates being made are from field data collection and is mainly to update the building tags based on what was found on the ground.
32018-07-06 11:38:57 UTCmueschel Sure: use overpass-turbo to create a query for these tags, then load this in JOSM and edit the tags.

Here's the query: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/A72
Then just click on 'Export' -> 'JOSM'.
60435250 by
Bert Araali		12018-07-06 10:39:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "buiulding:part" on 74 ways, could you fix the spelling of "building"?

Thanks, Jan
22018-07-06 10:51:07 UTCBert Araali Hi Jan, sorry for the mistake. Typo, will correct them imediatly. Could you help me in detecting those typo's ? I am using ID and JOSM but neither warns me about typo's when editing or uploading. What tool do you use ?
32018-07-06 10:58:49 UTCmueschel It's difficult to warn about spelling mistakes as there is no constraint on which keys you might use. I'm using a list of new keys that weren't used before based on Taginfo:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
42018-07-06 13:16:21 UTCBert Araali Thanks Jan, could help. Would be great if someone just adds some warnings to the validation rules for new tags added.
Typos are corrected.
60325410 by
Lyaza		12018-07-05 10:56:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 10 buildings with tags like "77 = 61", e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294213731

Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan
60267291 by
samuelrussell		12018-07-04 15:07:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain what a "beg_button" is? Did you mean "button_operated"?

Cheers, Jan
22018-07-14 06:49:16 UTCsamuelrussell Sorry, yes that's correct
60263940 by
stosh77		12018-07-04 15:05:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
this phone got two "covered" tags, could you check which one is right?

Cheers, Jan
22018-10-20 11:17:18 UTCstosh77 You are correct. I deleted this tag.Thank you.
60280716 by
JRGP		12018-07-04 15:03:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check the tags on this and several other landuses? The tags you used are not common. Only those tags described in the Wiki can be understood and used by any kind of software - other data is just 'invisible'.

Ciudad = Guayaquil
Ciudadela = Bellavista
Codigo Postal = 0...
60398184 by
Maria Christine		12018-07-04 14:12:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I found some non-standard tags in your edit, for example "building roof". The correct spelling is "building:roof". Please make sure you check all edits for such spelling mistakes - any error results in data that can't be understood by any software and e.g. ...
60376214 by
fondolucy		12018-07-04 14:09:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are again many non-standard tags in this edit - did you read the advice given by Frederik some months ago? https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1981
60288778 by
InfosReseaux		12018-07-03 13:16:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "lins = bay" on several power lines - could you check that?

Thanks, Jan
22018-07-04 21:27:04 UTCInfosReseaux Thank you to have noticed this !
It was an unfortunate typo.
A further changeset will move all those bogus ways to line=bay
60255695 by
laurent eau		12018-07-03 10:57:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
please have a look to the Wiki to learn about common tags - only those described in the Wiki can be understood by other users and software. E.g. "currency:Bitcoin" is not defined and should be currency:XBT.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:currency
60223313 by
zokert		12018-07-01 17:53:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node? Looks like some kind of mistake:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5723606955

Cheers, Jan
60209064 by
Mateusz Konieczny		12018-07-01 16:47:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you decide on one version of the tag? Now we have "still_visible_on", "visible_in" and "visible_on".
22018-07-05 08:19:52 UTCMateusz Konieczny If that is really problematic for you - feel free to migrate them to one tag (or even note of you really want to do that, but please keep it readable)
60321997 by
KanadierImQuadrat		12018-07-01 16:40:32 UTCmueschel Hallo,
in diesem Fall ist das Aufteilen in zwei Spuren wegen der großen Sperrflächen durchaus in Ordnung. Generell sollte man solche Teilungen aber nur dann machen, wenn Straßen wirklich baulich getrennt sind. Das ist auch ein Kritikpunkt: Der Weg für die Linksabbieger beginnt...
60040229 by
Mike Baggaley		12018-06-27 11:17:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of "foot:closed = permissive"? If access by foot is not permitted, the tag is "foot=no".

Jan
22018-06-27 14:49:21 UTCMike Baggaley Hi Jan, this was an attempt to retain the permissive value for foot whilst also indicating that the path was closed (access=no). This seemed better than simply removing the foot tag. If you can find a better way to show that pedestrian access is permissive but currently not allowed I would be please...
32018-06-30 16:48:30 UTCmueschel For temporary closed ways, we have the "temporary:" prefix -> temporary:access = no.

You can also just add a note explaining what the access rules will be after reconstruction.
60149870 by
geotom		12018-06-30 10:31:16 UTCmueschel Hallo,
bitte schau mal nach der Rechtschreibung in deinen Keys - es heißt "length", nicht "lenght".

Gruß, Jan
60111506 by
cat_crash		12018-06-24 14:59:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
these edits on ~100 stores look a lot like an edit for SEO.
You're introducing many new tags, don't add any source of the information.
Please spend some time to change all these POIs to use common tags like they are described in the Wiki.
22018-06-27 08:27:26 UTCfreebeer also, what do the fields like copyrights=AAP and google_id have to do with the OSM requirements for non-encumbered data?
It seems the source of the data is tainted or not allowable, and here I would suggest a revert to v2, considering I could not find useful licence info about mapk.in with a google...
32018-06-27 11:02:03 UTCcat_crash Why you have decided that it is encumbered data?
42018-06-30 10:29:28 UTCmueschel - The source you added is not a valid URL, we can not check it.
- You added a "copyrights" tag, which implies non-conformity with ODbL
- most of the tags you added do not follow any established tagging schemes

There are at least 16 shops that should be reverted in my opinion. The info...
52018-07-04 13:33:23 UTCcat_crash 1) any references how "validation" process looks like? Actualy I'm owner of mentioned mapk.in resource
2) I do.
3) All non-compliant tags were removed in next update
Any other concerns?
60281140 by
JRGP		12018-06-30 10:23:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
on this area you used some strange tags:
Ciudad=Guayaquil
Ciudadela=Bellavista
Código Postal=090603
Etapa=4ta
Manzana=63
Nombre=Ciudadela Bellavista, 4ta Etapa, Manzana 63

This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it....
60077030 by
michaelinredhill		12018-06-29 10:40:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600771620
caps lock and auto-completion don't combine well.
60260625 by
mueschel		12018-06-28 23:07:43 UTCEnock4seth This looks suspicious as Paypal is not an accepted means of payment in Ghana. Can you confirm data source? I've also sent an email to confirm. Best.
22018-06-28 23:37:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
this information was added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60160657
I just fixed the spelling of the tag.
32018-06-29 08:25:28 UTCEnock4seth My bad I should have checked history well. Sorry and thanks :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60260625
60208761 by
freeExec		12018-06-27 17:53:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
on these buildings I saw several keys with spaces in them like "building use" (should be building:use) and "wall: material" (wall:material). Could you have a look and fix these spelling mistakes?

Jan
60192314 by
ockim16		12018-06-27 17:51:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added two relations without any useful tag on them. Could you check these two, remove the imported foreign tags and add common OSM tags?

Thanks, Jan
60034878 by
LuSirto		12018-06-27 11:15:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "heavy_equipment = destination" here - this tag is new. What is the definition of "heavy_equipment"?

Jan
60167901 by
Jordanligutom		12018-06-27 11:05:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several tags with spelling mistakes. Please make sure that the spelling of all tags is correct - otherwise no software can understand them. Would you mind having a look and fix these issues? Example:
"roof: material" -> "roof:material"
... and several other, sim...
59802132 by
Laurent Magréault		12018-06-22 09:53:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "socket:typee" which looks like a mistake. Could you check what the right socket type is?

Jan
22018-06-26 19:14:06 UTCLaurent Magréault Hi,
There is 16 charging station with this socket type in France. Key is detailed on the french osm wiki page : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station. Type E is a domestic socket in France : https://www.worldstandards.eu/electricity/plugs-and-sockets/
Laurent
32018-06-26 20:34:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're right, the tag is new, but correct. Would you mind adding it on the wiki page for sockets?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket
42018-06-28 15:49:22 UTCLaurent Magréault Ok. Done.
60120911 by
Alibaer		12018-06-24 17:59:21 UTCmueschel Hallo,
dürfen hier wirklich nur Fußgänger, Radfahrer und Pferde durch? Keine forst/landwirtschaftlichen Fahrzeuge?
Jan
22018-06-25 10:11:37 UTCAlibaer Auf diese genaue Unterscheidung habe ich bisher noch nicht so genau geachtet. Mir war nur klar, dass anders als bisher in der OSM dort keine PKWs durchfahren dürfen. Sicher dürfen forstwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge durch. Bei der nächsten Fahrt dort (evtl. schon heute) schau ich mal, ob e...
32018-06-25 21:14:46 UTCAlibaer War heute auf dieser Strecke. Durchfahrt ist für Autos und Motorräder verboten, Forst- und landwirschaftliche Fahrzeuge frei. Werde es ändern.
42018-06-26 09:39:08 UTCAlibaer Wollte den Eintrag ändern, klappt aber mit den Vorgaben auf der Bearbeitenseite nicht. Für den Wegabschnitt gibt es auf beiden Seiten ein Verbotsschild 260 (oben Auto, unten Motorradfahrer), darunter, dass forstwirtschaftliche und landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge erlaubt sind. Vielleicht kann...
52018-06-26 11:19:10 UTCmueschel Dafür gibt es dieses praktische Tool:
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=260,1026-38
33819814 by
mueschel		12018-06-25 17:04:41 UTCluschi Hallo,
kleine Frage am Rande:
hier hast du einen Wegweiser in Österreich erfasst(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2399730302) mit "material=metal".
Laut meinen Information sind die Schilder aber aus Aluminium wegen der längeren Haltbarkeit.
sollte es da...
22018-06-25 17:11:25 UTCmueschel Hallo,
"metal" als Oberbegriff (Aluminium ist ja auch ein Metall) ist durchaus gängig. Wenn du es genauer weißt, kannst du das gerne ändern. Das gleiche gibt es ja auch bei Tags wie "surface": "paved" als grobe Einordnung, das bei genauerer Kenntnis ers...
32018-06-25 17:45:34 UTCluschi Hallo,
danke für die schnelle Antwort.
Deine Erklärung macht durchaus Sinn.
Wobei ich der Meinung bin, dass wir es so genau wie Möglich erfassen sollten, da wir die Möglichkeit dazu haben, egal ob ein Tool oder eine App nachher damit ein Problem hat.
Ich w...
59987720 by
Hasbro2		12018-06-25 10:56:09 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du hier mal nach den maxspeed-Tags schauen? Da sind zwei sich widersprechende.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243274570
60108229 by
cabinetcourbi		12018-06-25 10:46:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're using the key "traffic_signal" on many nodes, the correct key would be "traffic_sign".

Could you have a look and fix this?
Jan
60136241 by
JLZIMMERMANN		12018-06-25 10:44:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw that you added the tag "traffic_signal = E53c" on several nodes - the correct key is "traffic_sign". Could you have a look and fix this?

Thanks, Jan
22018-06-25 16:31:29 UTCJLZIMMERMANN Hello,
Thanks for the warning. I changed the mission here https://pic4review.pavie.info/#/mission/231/review
I'll modify all the dirty tags.
Regards

Jean-Louis
59925251 by
EriGonzalez		12018-06-24 14:42:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of tags: it's "landcover", not "lancover".

Cheers, Jan
60110463 by
SSR_317		12018-06-24 13:55:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
tags like "fut_ref_1" are not common. You could use "proposed:ref = I-69;IN 37" instead.

Cheers, Jan
60096991 by
rado raoilitinasoa		12018-06-24 13:53:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of tags - it's "highway", not "hidghway".

Jan
60095527 by
Valiha Tiava		12018-06-24 13:53:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of tags - it's "highway", not 'hidhway'.

Cheers, Jan
60049024 by
KanaLee		12018-06-23 17:17:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the tag "tm_data" you added on these nodes?
Thanks, Jan
22018-06-25 16:17:17 UTCKanaLee Hi Jan,

My bad. The tag was applied in error and has been removed. I will be modifying my workflow to ensure that incorrect tags are not applied in the future.

Thank you,
Kana
60082612 by
gwbpt		12018-06-23 16:44:29 UTCmueschel Could you please check this import? It created hundreds of areas with foreign tags, that don't look like they should appear in the OSM database, like the ones below.
commune=78117
contenance=6521
created=2007-02-21
id=78117000AK0068
numero=68
prefixe=000
section=AK...
59869931 by
cxc		12018-06-22 11:13:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tags route_id and shape_id ? These are not used on other bus routes.

Thanks, Jan
22018-06-22 13:53:36 UTCcxc Ciao,
Sorry for my bad english…
I take the route from gtfs data from this link… I take this from this link (I see now than update 19/06/2018… I hope it's better the last one)
http://dati.toscana.it/dataset/rt-oraritb/resource/fa9e9254-4fdc-44bb-b9fc-f3103a8a3781
I wanted to...
32018-06-22 13:58:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
the cc-by license of this data is incompatible with ODbL. This data must not be used in OSM, unless you have a written permission to use it.
42018-06-22 14:52:19 UTCcxc http://open.toscana.it/
???
52018-06-22 15:33:16 UTCmueschel Take the link "Privacy e note legali" and scroll to the last paragraph - the license is cc-by, which is an "open license", but not compatible to ODbL - we can't guarantee that the attribution is always kept along with the data.
62018-06-22 15:43:22 UTCcxc ok... I sent an email to info@open.toscana.it ... if the answer will be negative I delete everything ... I'm sorry for the inconvenience!

ciao
72018-06-22 15:45:13 UTCcxc Buonasera,
Scrivo in merito ai dati contenuti nel sito
http://open.toscana.it/

In particolare :

Scarica i nostri open data e usali come vuoi. Se non li trovi, chiediceli. Trasparenza, facilità di accesso, possibilità di interloquire con noi. Open data: una ricchezza a dis...
59770138 by
Javier Sanchez (imports)		12018-06-22 09:50:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? The key "Agroten" looks like a mistake.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596835820
22018-06-22 13:46:47 UTCJavier Sanchez Fixed. Thank you!
54674111 by
cabinetcourbi		12017-12-16 11:16:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you imported a lot of data for hotels here. Unfortunately, some of the tagging is wrong:
E.g. here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2428498001

- add:postcode should be addr:postcode
- there is no "award" tag, the proposal has been rejected
- 'stars' should only c...
22017-12-20 11:57:47 UTCmueschel Is there any chance that this will get cleaned up? If not, I opt for reverting this import.
32017-12-20 13:43:37 UTCJLZIMMERMANN Hello,
I work also on this changeset, we need a little time. We are working on an experimentation to improve tourism objects in this area of France. this is why you saw some odd tags. Thanks for your suggestions.
Regards
Jean-Louis
42017-12-23 10:36:51 UTCHarald Hartmann Sorry, but the live and production database of OSM isn't the right place for "experimentation", right? Please have a look at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_the_dev_server
52018-06-22 09:16:29 UTCmueschel It's now six months since you asked for "a little time". Is there actually anybody working on this? Many people are fixing some bits of this every now and then, but the vast majority of mistakes is still there.
59859739 by
Pemu		12018-06-21 18:10:25 UTCmueschel Hallo,
eine Relation wie diese, die das Wenden auf einem geraden Stück Straße verbietet, ist nicht nötig - sonst müsste man das ja auf jeder Straße einfügen.
Schau dir mal die Tags "overtaking" und "change" an - für das Erlauben von Ü...
59923106 by
Vladimír Domes		12018-06-20 19:49:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
I noticed this changeset because you introduced several new keys like "service:bicycle:rental:opening_hours", which are not used in other places. But the tagging seems strange - you tagged it as bicycle_parking, but it seems to be a station for rental bikes. Could you clarify this?
22018-06-21 08:33:38 UTCVladimír Domes Hi, Yes I can.
Rekola bikesharing company is new in Ostrava city. They use threir own bicycle stands and also existing stands (bicycle_parking).

Firstly I tagged their own stands as bicycle_rental, but we have talk in our Czech community (https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz/c2497) and I changed bicy...
32018-06-21 09:12:33 UTCmueschel Hi Vladimir,
this makes sense, it just wasn't obvious from the tagging.

Nevertheless,
I would suggest to have two nodes, one for the parking, one for the rental. This doesn't represent that there is actually just one object, but:

The very long keys like "service:bicycle:rental:opening_h...
59990537 by
mueschel		12018-06-19 20:56:57 UTCHjart Ok, maybe this one should have been documented a bit better: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AutoAWS#autoAWS_0.3_rc1
22018-06-19 20:59:45 UTCmueschel Sorry, I overlooked this - a Google search for "autoaws osm" didn't show something relevant.
I added it again: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59990763
32018-06-20 22:15:02 UTCHjart I'll recommend you search directly on the OSM wiki
42018-06-20 22:35:20 UTCmueschel Unfortunately this would miss discussions and "documentation" that is only in the mailing lists or forums - many people just don't use the Wiki.
59738023 by
Mirasolera		12018-06-20 11:30:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 5 ways like this one with only foreign tags. Could you check these?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596471297

Thanks, Jan
59675549 by
xinot		12018-06-20 11:22:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the name tag of this area?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12304410

Thanks, Jan
22018-06-20 11:46:02 UTCxinot Fixed. I probably was bit too hurry.
59987709 by
BER319		12018-06-20 11:18:29 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du bei 17 Wegen nochmal nach den Tags schauen? Es ist "parking:lane....", nicht "parkin:lane..."

Danke, Jan
22018-06-20 17:13:13 UTCBER319 Hallo Jan,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich wollte sowieso gerade noch einmal über diesen Bereich schauen, ob alles richtig ist.

Viele Grüße
BER319
59972263 by
Sheikh Zubeir		12018-06-20 11:17:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the spelling of tags? It's "intermittent", not "intermitent".

Thanks, Jan
22018-06-21 18:52:57 UTCSheikh Zubeir oops - thanks for the hint, corrected!
59587661 by
Ciceronbenavides		12018-06-19 20:48:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "fuel:GASOLINA_CORRIENTE = yes" on two gas stations - could you explain what this means? This tag is not used in any place.
59578422 by
badincite		12018-06-19 19:25:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "VMI=yes" to these buildings. This is not a common to mark that these buildings belong to one group. I guess you're looking for a tag like "operator=VMI".

Cheers, Jan
59932803 by
pon_de_lions		12018-06-19 18:15:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many Japanese keys for 2 recycling containers - could you change those tags to the common ones as they are described in the Wiki?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=recycling

Thanks!
59949623 by
talfik		12018-06-19 18:02:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like this import of data went wrong. Most of the objects have only strange tags like the ones below.

Also: if this is imported data, the source has to be clearly stated - "Bing" is most likely not correct.

colour=18
entity=2DPolyline
layer=Bangunan
li...
59910545 by
PhQ		12018-06-18 13:49:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used tags like "FR:TRANSDOME:CODE_ARRET" here. These are new and not used in other places yet.
In any case reference numbers like these should be in a "ref" tag, e.g. "ref:FR:TRANSDOME:CODE_ARRET".

59862799 by
abbytheexplorer		12018-06-16 16:50:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this area? It has many strange tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8383011

Jan
59880618 by
lubaum		12018-06-16 15:36:36 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was verstehst du unter einem "Architektenplan"? Hast du den unter einer Lizenz zu Verfügung gestellt bekommen, die kompatibel ist mit ODbL? Ansonsten dürfen solche Pläne nicht so einfach benutzt werden.
Gruß, Jan
59811642 by
커맵짱		12018-06-14 10:31:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I saw some tags like "전주제일고 정문 \t정문" in your edits. Please note that all tags in OSM have to use an English key, like those described in the Wiki. Here, the key might be "name". Could you check the edits you made and change the tags to comm...
59818755 by
ciastko_365		12018-06-14 10:28:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I saw that you added several opening hours with tags like "opening_hours_PKO_1". Please note that tags like these are not usable for any software. The tag has to be "opening_hours=..." And the syntax of the times has to follow the scheme described in the wi...
59789885 by
Zuzka_Majcova		12018-06-13 09:07:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
In your edits I found some tags like "building=house=yes" - this is a slight mistake and should be "building = house". There is always exactly one '=', separating a key and a value.

Could you check the buildings you added and change this tag?

If you h...
22018-06-20 18:53:07 UTCZuzka_Majcova Hi Jan,
Oh I didn't realise, sorry. I will go and fix it now!
Thanks,
Zuzka
59454968 by
VITALE Productos Naturales		12018-06-12 12:06:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please take some time and read the introduction (provided in the editor) how adding features to the map works. You need to follow certain schemes to make sure that all users and all software can make use of your data.

Jan
59434668 by
MaximusSayan		12018-06-01 08:55:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like something went wrong with this import. 1096 ways have some strange tags:
Cls_CheFor=04
Gestion=MFFP

Could you check and fix this?
22018-06-01 09:22:47 UTCMateusz Konieczny - bot account Can you link the place where this import was discussed?
32018-06-02 15:38:18 UTCMaximusSayan it does look like there was error on the import. will fix it and see to find where was the problem. the tagging have been made to keep the information from the MERN and the use of these off road road section in the ZEC.
42018-06-12 10:44:38 UTCmueschel There are also roads overlapping already existing ways like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592401176

I think that this import should be reverted and then reimported in a clean way.
52018-06-13 09:53:15 UTCMateusz Konieczny Note that as it is apparently undiscussed import it may be reverted without any discussion.
62018-06-13 09:56:51 UTCMateusz Konieczny https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59614357#map=12/45.5542/-77.1626&layers=N is the next apparently undiscussed import
72018-07-05 08:21:16 UTCMateusz Konieczny Again: is this import discussed anywhere? Imports MUST be discussed before doing them, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import for details
59735591 by
Mulenda Reina		12018-06-12 08:56:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't add tags like electricity_payments or cash_access to OSM - this is really private information that must not appear in a public data base. Could you please remove those tags?

Thanks, Jan
59735428 by
lovenes		12018-06-12 08:56:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't add tags like electricity_payments or cash_access to OSM - this is really private information that must not appear in a public data base. Could you please remove those tags?

Thanks, Jan
59705262 by
Pab09		12018-06-11 10:34:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're using the tag "tower_type" - the correct spelling is "tower:type". Would you mind checking the nodes you added and fix this mistake?

Cheers, Jan
59545191 by
lefty74		12018-06-08 18:40:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tags access=no, access:residents=yes here. There is a more common way:
access = residents (used more than 1000 times). Would you mind changing that?

Jan
22018-06-14 19:31:24 UTClefty74 Thanks for the tip.
59615242 by
talfik		12018-06-07 10:59:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - 100 of these ways have many strange tags which don't look like they should be there:
colour=18
elevation=0.00000000000e+000
entity=2DPolyline
fid_=0
layer=1
linetype=Continuous
linewt=25

Could you check & fix th...
59254277 by
william costa		12018-06-06 21:13:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added these tags to several roads:
paving=stones
surface=concrete
The first tag is new and looks like some mistake. Could you specify what the surface actually is?

Thanks, Jan
59535074 by
mueschel		12018-06-05 21:44:45 UTCSowa1980 Здравствуйте, поясните причину удаления тегов с объектов? Эти теги были проставлены согласно договоренности , жду отката Ваших правок.
22018-06-05 21:50:44 UTCmueschel Sorry, I don't speak Russian.
Names of mapping projects and contributors should not appear as tags on objects but rather in the changeset tags.
32018-06-05 21:56:17 UTCSowa1980 Там в тегах указана фамилия, по тому как проекты типовые , этот момент был обсужден в чате телеграмм в россии , вот что бы было понятно о чем речь ссылка https://ru.wikipedia.org...
42018-06-05 22:08:29 UTCmueschel yes, i know what a water tower is.
If you could describe what the meaning of "project:author" is, we could look for a better tag - this looked a lot like someone who wanted to put his own name into the tags. If you want to introduce a new tag like this, please write a page in the OSM wiki...
52018-06-05 22:17:00 UTCSowa1980 Project:author=Рожновского этот тег обозначает , что башня построена по типовому проекту имени Рожновского, ссылку я Вам дал. Жду Восстановления тегов. Вики к сожаления пр...
62018-06-05 22:19:16 UTCSowa1980 И да в проекте ОСМ не обязательно закреплять это в OSM wiki , согласно правилам проекта человек может применят теги не закрепленные в OSM wiki , которых там еще нет.
72018-06-05 22:37:29 UTCmueschel Ok, tagging the style of a water tower is indeed useful information, but this was not at all clear reading the tag.

I think you should consider changing the tag - "project:author' is in no way related to what you describe here - that would rather be something like 'water_tower:type' or 'wate...
82018-06-05 23:11:44 UTCSowa1980 Еще раз повторюсь жду отката изменений.
92018-06-06 11:40:35 UTCmavl Dear mueschel. I saw your message in the forum [https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62569].

My colleague "Sowa1980" writes that this changeset deletes the "Project:author" tags. He wants to find out the reason for deleting of this tag. Also he writes that this...
102018-06-06 11:53:04 UTCmueschel Perfect. The last sentence was completly lost in the automatic translation. I will add the tags again later today.
Thanks for you patience and help!
112018-06-06 12:14:40 UTCmavl @mueschel, not at all :-)

@Sowa1980, в значении тега специально использован родительный падеж ("Рожновского" вместо "Рожновский")? Возможно, именительный падеж был бы...
122018-06-06 15:38:57 UTCmueschel I now used the tag "water_tower:design" - because there are already a few "tower:design" in the database, and this seems to make sense.
Here is the changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59607226
132018-06-06 18:38:22 UTCSowa1980 да тут вообще то об авторстве больше речь шла)) автор как правило может быть и архитектор и вообще может им не быть)))
Даже, если у вас идея и Вы пришли с ней не к архит...
142018-06-06 18:47:06 UTCmueschel Sorry, the automatic translation of this is just incomprehensible.
In English, the word "author" doesn't exist in the context of designing buildings.
152018-06-06 18:48:52 UTCSowa1980 Почитайте вот это что бы было понятнее https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Рожновский,_Антон_Александрович
162018-06-06 18:52:42 UTCSowa1980 Я вас понимаю, что в английском этого нет)) но зачем Вы стерли теги вот чего я не понимаю )) раз в Вашем языке токового нет у нас то есть)) и вообще такие правки называют...
172018-06-07 16:05:42 UTCVort mueschel посчитал, что это имя автора объекта в OSM, а не в реальности (на земле). Поэтому он и удалил его. То есть, случилось недопонимание.
Тег :design неплох, я чуть подробн...
59242271 by
Kiekin		12018-06-06 16:09:49 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was meinst du mit "payment:ec-cash"? EC-Karten gibt es schon lange nicht mehr.

Gruß, Jan
59238123 by
nevw		12018-06-06 11:33:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
these two tags look like a mistake, could you check this?
Resources =Reserve
Wrattens \t=2
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1506573

Jan
22018-06-06 11:41:53 UTCnevw Thanks Jan
yes that looks like a mistake.
I will have a look and fix in the morning.
Nev
32018-06-06 23:24:53 UTCnevw Wrattens Resources Reserve 2 tags fixed now.
59217479 by
Bernard59118		12018-06-06 11:26:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain what the tag "Cremerie" on this vending machine means? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5638002199
It's not a common and known tag.

Thanks, Jan
59574218 by
rivermont		12018-06-06 11:15:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check these parks? They are overlapping with other parks that are already mapped.

Jan
59569892 by
Ezgiery		12018-06-06 11:12:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tag "andymkg=saglik" on 44 objects - could you explain what this means?

Thanks, Jan
22018-06-07 08:38:48 UTCEzgiery Hey, I work for HOT Turkey and we are doing services mapping for refugees. Those tags are to be able to layer different classes of services. When we finish this layering, that tag will change. Thats an abbreviation for Istanbul Anatolian Side NGO Coordination Group for Refugees. I work on my own acc...
32018-06-07 08:43:42 UTCEzgiery We could use created_by tag as well though. I know. Perhaps we will change it to something more meaningful like that after this layering. We are working with several NGOs now and it somehow seemed easier to create this key during the classification. I know it must look strange to you now. Hope I cou...
59573236 by
kabariac		12018-06-06 11:11:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added tags like "FieldPapers_id=KO13049081" to all of these buildings - these tags should not be uploaded to the OSM database becasus they don't contain any relevant information about the building itself. Could you have a look and remove these tags?

Cheers, Jan
59542590 by
Ale_Zena_IT		12018-06-05 07:23:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the spelling of tags on the tunnels? It's 'length', not 'lenght'.

Jan
22018-06-05 08:48:16 UTCAle_Zena_IT Oh, thanks Jan
59534570 by
Noskburg Group		12018-06-05 07:22:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please review your edits? I found at least 9 different spellings of the key 'proposed:amenity'. Tags with errors can't be used by any software.
22018-06-06 08:58:28 UTCNoskburg Group hi have check and amended... think i have got the all. thanks for the pointer.
59216625 by
51114u9		12018-06-04 12:03:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this parking? The tag 'pt=only' looks like a mistake.
http://osm.org/way/590544743

Cheers, Jan
22018-06-05 21:28:35 UTC51114u9 fixed as psv=only
59310858 by
SK53		12018-06-03 16:46:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way, the tag 'strans' looks like a mistake.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591343364#map=18/52.89320/-1.08773
59315453 by
Jubaerorun		12018-06-03 16:38:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many buildings with a 'name' tag - are these the names of the families living there? Please don't add such private information, OSM is not the right place for that.

Jan
59345960 by
Ana Paulabgs		12018-06-03 16:33:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tags 'telado' and 'Telado' here - these tags are not in use in any other place. Could you explain what they mean? In general, only tags that are documented in the Wiki should be used.

Jan
59352101 by
JAVIER_RIOS		12018-06-03 16:31:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tags like
"street-width=8 mts."

This tag is not used in any other place - the correct one would be "width=8" (note that there is no unit - 'meter' is the default
22018-06-04 19:00:03 UTCJJIglesias Saludos Javier, por favor no poner ningun valor NO numerico al usar la etiqueta street-with ; la unidad de medida por defecto de OSM es el metro, asi que al colocar un valor numerico el sistema asume por defecto q hablas de metros. al ponerle letras se corrompe el data. Para este caso solo van Numer...
32018-06-04 19:06:56 UTCJJIglesias de hecho la etiqueta que usastes street-width NO existe, lo correcto es la etiqueta width (ancho) aplicado a la via... y como dijimos el valor es SOLO NUMERICO
42018-06-04 19:12:38 UTCJJIglesias Saludos. Te recomendamos que leas el tutorial de Como Utilizar y Editar el mapa de OpenStreetMap, lo puedes encontrar aqui (en español); tambien hay varios tutoriales en Youtube:

http://learnosm.org/es/
59168669 by
pittrichimica		12018-06-03 11:47:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tags 'opening_hours' and 'variable_date' on this shop - could you explain what you want to tag? Is it open just between Easter and November 11th?

Jan
22018-06-03 12:34:28 UTCpittrichimica Hi Jan,
yes, that´s right. As this is a rather special case, I tried to figure out how to tag it using the wiki page. If you find an error, thanks for any tip how to improve...
Tanja
32018-06-03 15:14:01 UTCmueschel Alright, it's as simple as
opening_hours = easter-Nov 11 Mo-Su 10:00-18:00
You can check such things here:
http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/#check
42018-06-13 18:59:57 UTCpittrichimica Thanks Jan and sorry for the late reply. I adapted the tag. Examples are always easier than a synopsis...
59469907 by
Sedumjo		12018-06-03 11:38:36 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du benutzt hier das Tag "ref_ifopt" - richtig wäre "ref:IFOPT" - ich habe das gerade korrigiert.

Gruß, Jan
22018-06-04 06:06:35 UTCSedumjo Hallo Jan,
danke für die Berichtigung und deine Nachricht. Den Fehler werde ich bei den anderen von mir bearbeiteten Haltestellen berichtigen.
Viele Grüße
Sedumjo
59163590 by
Niels Elgaard Larsen		12018-06-01 17:21:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong with the tags on this building, could you check that?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8316732

Cheers, Jan
59116892 by
Ger Walsh		12018-05-31 18:41:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
what do you mean be 'unoccupied' on this node?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5008337295

Maybe 'disused:'?

Jan
22018-06-01 12:15:48 UTCGer Walsh Probably something that I should research further on the wiki- the term "disused", in my mind, has suggestions of "derelict" or "abandoned"... I merely meant that it is a viable unit, available/in suitable condition to be rented, and waiting for a tenant. But I am happy...
32018-06-01 12:54:28 UTCmueschel Ah, ok.
There is either the 'temporary:' prefix
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional)

Or you could add it to the opening_hours key, e.g. as "2018 Jan 01 - 2018 Jun 25 off"
59187231 by
Sedumjo		12018-06-01 11:30:58 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du benutzt hier den Key "ref_ifopt", die richtige Schreibweise wäre "ref:IFOPT". Ich habe das gerade mal korrigiert.

Gruß, Jan
59119396 by
bkn_jap		12018-06-01 11:17:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
what does 'decay=yes' mean?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/589605323
Maybe "abandoned=yes"?

Cheers, Jan
22018-06-03 11:04:27 UTCbkn_jap I checked the wiki, I guess it's more "disused". Thanks for the suggestion of "abandoned".
59209050 by
look4book		12018-05-31 18:39:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
Please update your OsmAnd app - this version produces wrong tags like "osmand_electricity_combined = charging".
59379657 by
Something B		12018-05-31 12:35:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found nodes like this one where you added two traffic signs on one node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5650354865

Unfortunately, this doesn't work - almost no software is able to understand tags with a ':2' added and this scheme is also not well-defined (albeit in use in few places l...
22018-05-31 21:25:07 UTCSomething B Hi, Jan!
The idea of using the suffix: 2 is described here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_traffic_signs_tagging but Your idea is more like it. Thank you!
Regards,
Something B.
59103579 by
Linda Chimento		12018-05-21 13:00:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You added the tag "alpinescapes=alpinescapes" to many buildings. This tag is not common and not used in any other place. Could you explain what it means?

In general, only tags that are described in the wiki or are available in the menues in the editor should be use...
22018-05-25 08:27:02 UTCLinda Chimento Hi,
Thank you!
I'm working on a project named Alpinescapes, so I added this tag to find easily all the buildings I previously added.
This is the web site of the project, check it out if you want. http://www.paesaggiculturali.polimi.it/#

Linda.
32018-05-30 11:32:43 UTCmueschel Please don't use tags to add private markers. Keep in mind that there are thousands of copies of the OSM database worldwide, and nobody besides you can make any use of these tags.
.
The name of a project you are working on should be put to the changeset comment.
59102604 by
k8tek		12018-05-30 11:28:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 2 nodes with the key 'ASR' - this is new, what does it mean?

Jan
22018-05-30 12:35:53 UTCk8tek Antenna Structure Registratration.

http://wireless.fcc.gov/antenna/index.htm?job=home
59104945 by
Wilmer Osario		12018-05-30 11:22:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node? Something went wrong with the name tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5628836047
Cheers, Jan
22018-05-30 18:38:17 UTCWilmer Osario Thanks, fixed-it
59331494 by
Esmat Enan		12018-05-30 08:57:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many strange tags on these objects:

address=Ward no 6
damage=Yes
damage_date=2017
damage_description=Ground floor inundated by 2017 floods and eroded cementing of the bottom of the concrete walls
damage_percent=0.25
hazrad_intensity=low

Please use only tags that are described...
59341823 by
Ale_Zena_IT		12018-05-30 08:26:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are 24 ways here that have very strange tags. Could you have a look and fix this?
For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591616594

Thanks, Jan
22018-05-30 08:52:59 UTCAle_Zena_IT Hi, thanks Jan, I've fixed.
Still remains an ambiguity on a place of worship https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240809743 so I've contacted the user
59347763 by
Juan Pedro Ruiz		12018-05-30 08:23:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 323 buildings have the tag "building_l" which looks like "building:levels". Could you check that?

Thanks, Jan
59289819 by
ABMotau		12018-05-28 11:11:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "residential_details=no" on many objects - could you explain what this is supposed to mean? This tag is not used anywhere else and is not documented.

Jan
22018-05-28 21:13:23 UTClusdavo Thanks @mueschel, this has been rectified!

David.
59272554 by
lusdavo		12018-05-28 11:10:52 UTCmueschel Hi,,
you added the tag "residential_details=no" on many objects - could you explain what this is supposed to mean? This tag is not used anywhere else and is not documented.

Jan
22018-05-28 11:32:36 UTClusdavo Hi @mueschel, this has been rectified. Thank you for pointing it out to us.

David.
59334832 by
CavinAries		12018-05-28 11:10:45 UTCmueschel Hi,,
you added the tag "residential_details=no" on many objects - could you explain what this is supposed to mean? This tag is not used anywhere else and is not documented.

Jan
22018-05-28 14:38:46 UTClusdavo Thanks @mueschel, this has been rectified.

David.
59073518 by
nammala		12018-05-28 11:08:38 UTCmueschel You added nodes like this one with tags which shouldn't be there.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5626283044/history

Please make sure that Mapbox (finally!) fixes this issue in their software. I'm annoyed of having to fix such nodes every week since months.
22018-05-29 04:04:24 UTCnammala Hi mueschel,

Thanks for flagging the issue , this was caused due to fixing connectivity issues in the city through JOSM and from next time we will make sure that this doesn't happen.

Regards,
nammala
59077870 by
Hernan		12018-05-28 10:05:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used tags that are not common:
nom_depto = GENERAL ROCA
nom_prov = RIO NEGRO

Can they be replaced by a known key? E.g. is_in:province?

Cheers, Jan
22018-05-28 11:52:11 UTCHernan Hello! Yes, I fixed it. I am checking all the towns and cities of my country and I am using a free database of settlements in all the territory for the smaller towns, but without importing it. I am comparing the information that is in OSM case by case. Those labels forget to delete them, but conside...
59276748 by
Павел Гетманцев		12018-05-28 09:52:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain this edit? Tags like "name:Mar-May:" are not common in OSM and not used in other places.

Jan
59316077 by
Jubaerorun		12018-05-28 09:43:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many strange tags on your objects.
First of all, please do not enter any private information like the names of families or the number of people living in a house. This is no information OSM collects for privacy reasons.

Also, please use only tags that are described in the Wiki or ar...
59283001 by
Saima Akter Tithi		12018-05-28 09:40:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many strange tags on these objects:

Damage_Per=50.0
Descriptio=North Borober Jami Mosque Cemetery
Latitude=25.43255
Longitude=89.71982
Name_of_As=Cemetery
Name_of_Di=Flood
Village_Wa=2 No
dam_last_d=Yes
damage_description=Mudslide
if_y...
59312098 by
Sameya Afrin		12018-05-28 09:38:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many strange tags on these objects:

Damage_Per \t50.0
Descriptio \tTin shade
Name_of_As \tSchool Institute
Name_of_Di \tFlood
Village_Wa \t4 no word Raniganj
What_damag \tFlood damage has occurred
amenity \tschool
building \tyes
dam_last_d \tYes
hezard_intensity \tHigh

Pl...
59263503 by
Nazmun Nahar Chowdhury		12018-05-28 09:37:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many strange tags on these objects:

Damage Percentage=hazard_intensity=high
Damage_Per=100
Name_of_As=Italu Kanda digrir char teribad
Name_of_Di=Flood
Village_Wa=Italu kanda gachbari 1
What_damag=damaged by flood
dam_last_d=Yes
if_yes_whe=2017
...
59306602 by
Jasmen khelze sweety		12018-05-28 09:34:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many strange tags on these objects:

damage=Yes
damage_Per=0.0
damage_description=The field sank in flood
if_yes_whe=2017.0

Please use only tags that are described in the Wiki or are listed in your editor. All other tags can not be understood by any OSM-based software.

Jan
59039912 by
nadzkie		12018-05-24 11:06:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several 'addr:village' tags on your landuse areas. This looks like a mistake. I think some of them should be addr:city or addr:county. Could you have a look and adjust this?

Thanks, Jan
59051272 by
EPFNA		12018-05-24 10:40:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
On this node, the 'payment:...' tags should be different, using tags as they are described in the Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Ke...
59058214 by
danbag		12018-05-24 10:34:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way and its tag 'sy'?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/589055105

Thanks, Jan
22018-05-25 06:24:34 UTCdanbag Hi Jan
I make a mistake and I have erased the tag sy:520.
Thanks for the information.
Best reagards
Danilo (danbag)
32018-07-02 08:09:48 UTCdikkeknodel Hi Danilo,
I just noticed by coincidence, you added a second Case Cana, the other is 400m northwest and has been there for 8 months longer. I guess one of both has to be a mistaken name.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5113086243
I updated that one after a visit, but I did not come up with t...
59199914 by
Mateusz Pawlowski		12018-05-24 09:13:55 UTCmueschel Please update your GoMap app - this version has a bug and produces wrong tags like "payment:payment:cash".
59193539 by
tzosmimport		12018-05-23 07:55:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
these changes have a tag "add:region" which should be "addr:region".

What is the meaning of the key "building:sqmeters" on nodes?

And: Your user page is missing a link to the description of the import in the Wiki.

Cheers, Jan
22018-05-23 14:14:42 UTCtzosmimport Jan,
Thanks for catching the typo.
We are working on the Wiki.
32018-08-11 06:26:23 UTCNakaner-repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61558473 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import adding of Plus Codes and sizes of buildings. The codes can be derived from the coordinates. The size can be derived from the building geometry. See https://lists.openstre...
59114779 by
mrsfakename		12018-05-21 12:58:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw tags like "addr:unit_7" on the buildings here. Adding the same tag several times with numbers '_7' is not really common and not supported by most software. I suggest to consider using a single tag and a range of numbers instead, like
addr:unit = 51 - 58

Jan
22018-05-22 17:06:27 UTCmrsfakename Hello and thanks for the input. I'll start incorporating the changes for all the apartment complexes I've been working on. However, if there's a break in apartment numbers what's the standard for entry? For instance, a building has apartments 1-12, no apartment 13, but does have apartments 14-20?...
32018-05-22 19:05:28 UTCmueschel If several buildings share a housenumber, you can add the same "addr:housenumber" to all of them.
If these buildings are all within one area, like an amenity=school area, you can add the address on this area instead of the buildings themselves.
.
You can use addr:unit = 1-13;20-28 (lis...
59168398 by
AgusQui		12018-05-22 11:00:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're using the tag "stopping_patern" here. The correct spelling is "stopping_pattern". I just fixed the ones I found.

Cheers, Jan
22018-05-22 13:34:09 UTCAgusQui Thanks.
59019667 by
Gazer75		12018-05-21 14:37:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, it has many strange tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5622276584

Thanks, Jan
22018-05-21 15:25:26 UTCGazer75 Oops, looks like one of the nodes I had to import from the aviation obstacle data didn't get retagged properly :) Thanks for spotting that. Fixed now.
32018-05-22 00:19:47 UTCGazer75 How did you spot this error?
42018-05-22 09:03:35 UTCmueschel Using Taginfo I generate a list of keys which newly appear in the database - in most cases it's reporting simple spelling mistakes.
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
59144239 by
okilimu		12018-05-22 08:48:32 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier 'left:kerb' und 'left:kerb:height' verwendet. 'left' wird in der Regel als Suffix verwendet, richtig w're also kerb:left und kerb:height:left.
Gruß
Jan
22018-05-22 16:58:32 UTCokilimu danke für den Hinweis, Jan!
Ich habe die Tags angepasst
59025132 by
rsavoye		12018-05-21 14:38:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 14 objects with strange tags:
unitid=Glacier
unittype=BLDG
Could you have a look and fix these?

Thanks,
Jan
22018-05-21 14:55:11 UTCrsavoye Thanks, that obscure tag slipped through the data conversion from the original shapefile. I updated those objects without the tag, and fixed the bug in my conversion software.
59011308 by
Augustino Elifasi		12018-05-21 13:09:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You used several new and uncommon tags here:
Eastings=489004, Northings=9289605
- there is no need to add coordinates to the tags, the node itself is already placed at this position.

location=Bagamoyo
- this should be part of the address, here: addr:city=Bagamoyo

time=...
59090737 by
frosm		12018-05-21 13:05:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you introduced a new tag here, "entrance:step:height".
The simpler "step:height" is already used 500 times by 40 users. Could you think about using the same tag here?

Cheers, Jan
22018-05-21 16:14:50 UTCfrosm Hello,
Thanks for the comment.
I also use step:height on entrance to describe the step:height.
but using step:height on a node poi is imho wrong.
for ex how to describe that a restaurant has a small step at its front door but you have no information about a possible step after the entrance ?
ho...
59123515 by
anttihav		12018-05-21 12:56:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 10 nodes with a strange tag:
opastin={suunta=laskeva, puoli=oikea, tyyppi=ysje}
Could you have a look and fix this (e.g. change to common tags)?

Cheers, Jan
58977245 by
Adiatma IRM-RV		12018-05-20 14:48:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several nodes with a tag "splitPoint". This is no common tag - could you explain what it means?

Thanks, Jan
22018-05-21 00:21:30 UTCAdiatma IRM-RV Hi Jan, thank you for bringing this up. SplitPoint is our internal sign as a boundary mark for the intersection of the Tasking Manager box. It should not have been uploaded. My bad & I already deleted it. I will pay more attention to recheck befor upload. Thank you so much Jan.
58985694 by
Chumva		12018-05-20 14:45:37 UTCmueschel Please don't add such test nodes to the OSM database. For tests there is a development server available.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
59001177 by
mmrdu		12018-05-20 14:34:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used many tags that are not common in OSM like the ones listed below. Would you mind checking the wiki how these have to be mapped to be usable in all OSM-based services?

Thanks, Jan



Address = At the end of Front St adjacent to boat ramp
Amenities = Boat ramps, water fountain...
22018-05-24 01:05:38 UTCmmrdu Tags have been corrected, thanks for catching that.
58957878 by
Bernard59118		12018-05-20 13:26:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of this node? Its tag looks strange.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5617878912

Thanks, Jan
58965812 by
LeonSKennedy19		12018-05-20 11:26:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, the tag looks like a mistake:
"fitness_station_1 =ew"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5618410298

Thanks, Jan
59089949 by
Bert Araali		12018-05-19 10:55:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "maxspeed:agriculture" on several ways - the correct spelling would be "maxspeed:agricultural". Could you have a look and fix it?

Cheers, Jan
22018-05-21 11:20:20 UTCBert Araali Hello Jan,

Sorry for the typo. I think all of them are fixed now.
59019200 by
Sawan Shariar		12018-05-17 18:17:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
this import of more than 6000 buildings seems to have many issues. Among all the tags I find on the objects, only one is correct (building = yes). All the others are no documented tags in OSM.
Please fix this!

Here are just a few of them:
addr_city \t=dhaka
addr_country \t=bangladesh
ad...
22018-05-19 04:53:45 UTCSawan Shariar Dear mueschel
Thank you so much for your kindness. Yes, All the tags are incorrect. Mistakenly I was wrote it (_) in the tags which should be it (:). And some tags are really incorrect. All data will be corrected within a few days. If needed may I contact with you?
Thanks
32018-05-19 10:03:49 UTCmueschel Perfect. Thanks for taking care.

Sure you can contact me in case you need help. Just let me know!

Jan
42018-05-19 11:11:46 UTCSawan Shariar Thanks :)
59048676 by
mhrana98		12018-05-18 10:29:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
the buildings you edited here do have many misspelled tags that are not used in any other place in OSM. Could you have a look and correct them as well?

Here are just a few of them:
addr_city =dhaka
addr_country =bangladesh
addr_house =281
addr_postcode =1213
addr_street =kaporptti Road ...
58935927 by
Milton Chaúque		12018-05-18 10:17:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
Could you specify if this is a hospital or a pharmacy?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5615996531
The name and the tag are contradictory.

Thanks, Jan
58903147 by
Tarasivets		12018-05-17 18:36:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of the hotel?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437435712

There are two internet_access:fee tags, one 'yes', one 'no'.

Jan
58913600 by
Gimnasio Jhalit Fitnes Alto Trujillo		12018-05-17 18:32:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please note that all keys you use to identify an object needs to be in English -
everything else is not understood by the software and is not shown on maps.
Have a look to the wiki ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org ) to find the common tags.
You can also refer to to the preset...
58980167 by
Pab09		12018-05-17 18:27:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several tags "tower_type" in your edits. The correct spelling is "tower:type" - I just fixed it.

Cheers, Jan
58876714 by
Sidou_Dahaba		12018-05-17 18:23:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the tags on this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340916396

Bassin =yes
Lit du fleuve =yes
basin = yes

All of them are not defined and the first two are not used in any other place.

Thanks, Jan
58167444 by
mueschel		12018-05-16 15:22:51 UTClowlander Es wieder zu löschen, wenn es korrekt ist, bringt genau gar nichts weil es nun ohnehin in der Datenbank ist. Ich werde es also revertieren bzw. wieder eintragen. Hauptsache, du bist zufrieden.
22018-05-16 15:35:05 UTCmueschel Es gibt durchaus gute Gründe nur die ID und keine kompletten URLs in OSM zu haben. Was passiert beispielsweise wenn Münster sich entscheidet ihre Webseite umzuorganisieren (was bei vielen großen Seiten häufiger passiert)? Ist nur die ID in der Datenbank muss man nur an einer Ste...
32018-05-16 15:38:32 UTClowlander Warum kommentierst du das nicht in meinem Changeset, wie es üblich ist und löscht stattdessen einfach die Ergänzungen statt sie zu revertieren? Darüber solltest du einmal nachdenken.
Ich ergänze nun die neuen, korrekten ID-URLs, wie sie auch von den Stadtwerken bereitgestel...
42018-05-16 15:43:02 UTCmueschel Es gibt keinen technischen Unterschied zwischen löschen und revertieren. Ich habe nur die Tags gelöscht, so ist sicher dass andere, nützliche Änderungen aus deinen Changesets nicht aus Versehen auch verloren gehen.
Kümmerst du dich auch um eine Anpassung der URLs wenn dies...
52018-05-16 16:05:40 UTClowlander Ja, ich kümmere mich in "meinem Bereich" regelmäßig um Änderungen und Ergänzungen, da ich auch nur dort mappe und tagge, wo ich es überprüfen (lassen) kann. Das siehst du an dieser Diskussion.
Über bessere Arbeitsweisen lasse ich mich aber gern bel...
62018-05-16 16:12:21 UTCmueschel Ja, einen Kommentar an deinem Changeset habe ich in diesem Fall tatsächlich vergessen, entschuldige.
72018-09-25 19:08:20 UTClowlander Offensichtlich erfasst nun jemand anderes die Links zu allen Haltestellen (in Münster) unter dem Tag Website und abweichender ID (die ohnehin nicht mehr passt weil die Standtwerke schon seit Jahren andere IDs verwenden) nach meinem obigen Muster neu.
58876284 by
Camachogonzalez		12018-05-16 11:58:56 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM.
This node uses no common tags.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Also, our database in case sensitive, all keys have to be in lower case (with
very few exceptions). Please have a l...
58946283 by
Mainga		12018-05-16 11:38:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 135 buildings with the tag 'osm_way_id'. This doesn't look like a tag that should be there. Could you check it and remove it?

Thanks, Jan
58860070 by
Kogacarlo		12018-05-15 10:53:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
the socket type on this node seems strange, this type doesn't exist in other places.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5610128787
Could you have a look?
Jan
22018-05-15 12:23:55 UTCKogacarlo Hi Jan, please take a look at this picture I took https://i.imgur.com/ulu6DcC.jpg and then change the node as you wish. I'm not a socket pro ;-)
32018-05-15 12:37:32 UTCmueschel According to the images in the Wiki this is a 'type2': https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket

The number seems to be some ID of this charging station.
42018-05-15 17:24:00 UTCKogacarlo Ja, type2 denke ich auch. Was 1712498 heisst weiss ich nicht.
53640698 by
topolusitania		12018-05-15 10:59:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these objects?
They do have very strange name tags like 'Ponto F 38,424444N 9,0886111W'. This can't be an actual name.
And it's 'protect_class', not 'protected_class'.

Please don't forget to add the source of your information to the changeset!
22018-06-11 12:30:38 UTCFilohipo Ponto F. and other points named "Ponto" are points that limit the protected area of "Parque Marinho Luis Saldanha". They are mentioned witl lat and long in the law that created it. They are inportant for openseamap.
58864353 by
RubenKelevra		12018-05-15 10:56:47 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du benutzt hier das Tag 'road_markings', das gibt es sonst nirgends. Entweder 'traffic_sign' für Schilder oder 'road_marking' für Markierungen auf der Straße.

Gruß, Jan
58850065 by
nbuettler		12018-05-15 10:51:31 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was heißt denn das Tag "strate = temporary"? Wenn dieser Bus nur zeitweise verkehrt, kannst du das mit dem Tag opening_hours machen.
58946736 by
MrKrisKrisu		12018-05-15 10:38:27 UTCmueschel Hallo,
würdest du nochmal über das Tagging schauen? An 48 Wegen steht "destination:symbols" anstelle von "destination:symbol".

Danke
Jan
22018-05-15 10:44:12 UTCMrKrisKrisu Mache ich nachher direkt, danke für's drauf Aufmerksam machen.
58930121 by
gekapes		12018-05-14 09:06:25 UTCmueschel Hallo,
die Verkehrsschilder für cycleway und sidewalk kannst du erfassen mit

cycleway:left:traffic_sign = DE:237

Das ist besser als eine note:*

Gruß, Jan
22018-05-14 18:14:48 UTCgekapes Hallo Jan,

ja - schaut sicher besser und verständlicher aus. Werde ab jetzt auch so taggen. Beziehst Du Dich auf diese Seite:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign ?

ich habe inzwischen viele durch note:sign gemacht - werde diese nicht ändern, da es zu viel Arbeit ist...
32018-05-14 18:17:39 UTCmueschel Ja, das ist die Kombination von
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Supplementary_details
und deinem Link.
Ein Blick in Taginfo zeigt, dass diese Tags schon ziemlich häufig verwendet werden:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/cycleway%3Aleft%3Atraffic_sign#overview
58931809 by
Bobby444		12018-05-14 09:02:48 UTCmueschel Hi Bobby,

in your edits, I saw several tags like "bobby444:schema" - could you explain what it means? It's very uncommon to put ones username in a tag.

And: the tags like "pattern_saturday:interval" are not used in any other place.
The usual key for this is "interval:...
22018-05-14 09:33:50 UTCBobby444 The bobby444:schema is a private notation for me until I can get things stabilised. It is part of my nascent system for tagging bus services sensibly. When I've decided how it is going to work, I'll submit it as a proposal for people to vote on. I used my own username so as to avoid conflicts with o...
32018-05-14 10:20:45 UTCmueschel Alright, work in progress is always good.
I don't really like the idea to have so much information in the key. This mostly ends in a huge mess of subkeys that no tool can parse easily.
Did you try to use the syntax used in :conditional tags? That would be the perfect way to tag arbitrary times a...
42018-05-14 11:06:27 UTCBobby444 Yes, it's ugly, and I tried to explain what I was up against on the talk:buses page, but my edits got lost somehow.

A huge mess of subkeys is, as you say, a bad idea.

I'm not familiar with this conditional syntax that you mention. Is it documented anywhere ?

OSM doesn't seem to 'get' buses,...
52018-05-14 11:08:02 UTCBobby444 If you can provide me a link to the :conditional stuff, I'll try and rework my relations to use that, then I won't need to have 'my own' schema.
58675546 by
mueschel		12018-05-14 06:34:07 UTCPT-53 Hallo mueschel,
Du hast an diesem zurückgebauten Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371762169/history removed:highway auf not:highway geändert. Warum ?
22018-05-14 08:55:04 UTCmueschel Der ehemalige Weg an sich ist wohl keine erhaltenswerte Information, auch wenn er im Augenblick in der Datenbank bleiben sollte als Markierung, dass die Luftbilder nicht mehr stimmen.
Für so etwas nehme ich eher not: als removed:.
Ich habe den Weg aber auch nur umgetagged, weil ich die ander...
32018-05-14 11:39:19 UTCPT-53 Hallo mueschel,
wir sind uns einig, daß der Weg - solange er noch auf den Luftbildern zu sehen ist - noch in OSM verbleiben soll.
Aber warum verwendest Du not:highway statt wie im Wiki vorgegeben removed:highway ?
Wiki Lebenszyklus: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
....
42018-05-18 12:24:37 UTCPT-53 Hallo mueschel,
ich habe das wieder auf das Wiki-konforme korrekte Tagging zurückgesetzt.
58806614 by
Eng Eqlima Rasuli		12018-05-13 13:14:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "yares" on this road. It's not used in any other place, what does it mean?

Jan
58794492 by
Alexb60		12018-05-12 12:05:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? The tag "basc" looks like a mistake.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231719753

Cheers, Jan
58873162 by
phiona2018Munezero		12018-05-12 10:10:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like this import of 405 nodes went wrong. All these nodes have many tags, but none of them uses a known key. Could you check that?


And: There is no information about the source. "esri World Imagery" is obviously wrong.
58751183 by
dingalo		12018-05-11 10:50:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "buildings:name" on 53 ways. Could you fix the spelling? It's "building:name".

Thanks, Jan
58768537 by
d3mol3k		12018-05-11 10:47:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of 62 ways? It's "construction", not "constuction".

Thanks, Jan
22018-05-11 16:36:31 UTCd3mol3k Thanks Jan - she made a typo. Corrected. Robert
58805010 by
opengislab		12018-05-10 10:55:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like there are several things wrong with this import.

1) Could you point me to the page detailing how this import is done? It has to exist according to the Import Guidelines

2) Sources have to be clearly stated in the changeset. A tag "notas" asking to respect licenses ...
58535439 by
bau-lau		12018-05-01 09:38:18 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du brauchst hier keine komplizierte Tag-Konstruktion wie
restriction:taxi =no_left_turn
type =restriction:taxi

Du kannst ganz normal
type=restriction
restriction = no_left_turn
verwenden - alle anderen als Taxis dürfen ja ohnehin nicht in die Straße rein, sind von der Re...
22018-05-09 21:21:33 UTCbau-lau Hallo Jan,
die von Dir "komplizierte Tag-Konstruktion" habe ich von der wiki abgeschrieben (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Tags). Scheinbar wird dies aber von den sogar darauf spezialisierten Fahrradroutern (wie z.B. brouter oder GraphHopper) (noch?) nicht ausg...
32018-05-09 21:34:59 UTCmueschel Wie du schon schreibst, solche speziellen Konstrukte sind von vielen Tools nicht komplett unterstützt. Deswegen immer so einfach wie möglich taggen. Das Wiki gibt dort ja auch gleich drei verschiedene Taggingmöglichkeiten.
Diese scheinen auch alle keine Verbreitung zu haben.
type=r...
58795933 by
Dante Torreggiani		12018-05-09 18:51:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tag "truks_residential \tyes"? This is not used in any other place.
Thanks, Jan
58754728 by
Danilo Freiles		12018-05-09 11:58:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "recycling:Olio_usato" here. What kind of oil is it? We do have the tags "recycling:cooking_oil" or "recycling:motor_oil" to be more precise.

Jan
22018-05-09 15:12:17 UTCDanilo Freiles cooking_oil
Corrected, thx.
58814634 by
muindre		12018-05-09 11:55:49 UTCmueschel Typically toilets do use other tags.
For example:

hand_wash_point -> toilets:handwashing
how_many_chambers -> toilets:num_chambers
type_of_toilet -> toilets:disposal
58812585 by
muindre		12018-05-09 11:51:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag "gender_type" is not common. OSM uses "gender=male/female/mixed".

the tag "type" is not used for schools. We do use "school=*" or "isced:level".
58781865 by
muindre		12018-05-09 11:49:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tags "cost_per_litre", "cost_per_liter" and "cost_in_ksh" do not fit to our usual tags.

OSM knows fee = yes/no as well as charge=*

The tag "village" is not common as well. To note the location we use "is_in:...=*"
58787234 by
poornibadrinath		12018-05-09 09:09:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are some nodes which seem to be imported error markers from your software.
For example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5604444613

I saw these mistakes by many people working at Mapbox - could you try to get your companies workflow fixed?

Jan
22018-05-09 09:14:39 UTCpoornibadrinath Hi,
Thank you so much for letting us know about this. We will work in fixing these. We have deleted most of them already. But I guess we missed a couple of the pointers. Will rectify it soon. Thanks again!
32018-05-09 09:14:57 UTCpoornibadrinath *on
58551465 by
muindre		12018-05-01 09:26:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many objects with tags like these:
Opening_hours=24_7
Photo=1524481337267.jpg
Village=Upper Kitheini
type_of_facility=Water pipeline
wb_pb:id=21640565
This information might be correct, but is rather useless - the tags don't follow any established tagging schem...
22018-05-08 09:19:35 UTCmuindre Hi Mueschel, tried writing back to you explaining about the tags but it seems our message was never delivered. We are already in the process cleaning up the data and fixing the tags.
32018-05-08 20:24:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
perfect that you take care. In total I found 50 different tags which are not used in any other place. Most of them can easily be changed to common and documented keys.
Just send me a message if I can assist in any way.
Jan
58760582 by
Geodemaria		12018-05-08 13:01:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of these Relations? They don't seem to have any known tag.

Jan
22018-05-08 13:49:44 UTCGeodemaria Hi Jan, I used the generic relationship "building" = "house". I found the tags here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Map_Features#Abitazioni

I hope I was clear.
See you soon!
32018-05-08 20:18:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
I think there are several issues here. First, all buildings are mapped twice, for example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/586368852
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/586355996
These are two ways for the same building. One should be removed. In total there are 1339 of these errors in the v...
42018-05-08 21:18:41 UTCGeodemaria Hello, good evening. you are definitely right. I have brought back information from the initial shape file that is not needed. in the coming days I will modify all the problems encountered. this is my first insertion of this scope. sorry.


58744946 by
maning		12018-05-08 12:59:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of all these objects? It's 'addr:state', not 'add:state'.

Jan
22018-05-08 14:19:34 UTCmaning Thanks for flagging, obviously a mistake. Fixing here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58790245
58769317 by
Mateusz Konieczny		12018-05-07 20:12:50 UTCmueschel Would you please check the edits and not reintroduce wrong tags by doing reverts blindly? And: if you comment a changeset of another user, please wait for an answer, otherwise discussion is pointless.
22018-05-07 20:29:56 UTCMateusz Konieczny I reverted your edit because you made several edit based on misconception that only tags described in OSM wiki are allowed.
32018-05-07 20:45:58 UTCmueschel This specific tag was only added due to a bug in the GoMap app that has been fixed meanwhile.
42018-05-07 20:49:45 UTCMateusz Konieczny Maybe I overreacted in this case - feel free to revert this edit if you think that it improves map.
57626490 by
mueschel		12018-04-18 18:39:35 UTCmarczoutendijk Any specific reason why you moved this tagging to a note? Did you read the discussion on the Dutch forum?
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60633
22018-04-19 08:19:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
it's a new tag that wasn't used before. I checked the wiki and wasn't able to find any description of it. I didn't find a discussion in the forums, but I also don't speak Dutch.

I'm perfectly fine with using the tag - you seem to have some discussion about it and if you add a description in ...
32018-05-07 20:11:30 UTCMateusz Konieczny Why you think that hiding "random tags" in notes improves anything? Nonsense useless tags should be deleted, mistagged info should be fixed.

Moving them to notes merely hides problem and accomplishes nothing - this kind of edit is as result harmful.
42018-05-07 20:18:55 UTCmueschel It's not hiding the information - in contrary, it makes it visible. JOSM shows it now as a special icon, and also iD can list it for the casual user you doesn't look in the list of all tags.
52018-05-07 20:28:03 UTCMateusz Konieczny What you mention may be achieved by adding "fixme=suspicious tags XYZ".

Moving weird tags to note makes nearly impossible to spot issue again.
58736763 by
mueschel		12018-05-07 20:05:54 UTCMateusz Konieczny it just makes them harder to spot and really fix! What is the point of that edit?
22018-05-07 20:17:09 UTCmueschel Would you please stop reverting the work of others without discussion? A 'description' tag is exactly the right place to list the amenities a park has to offer.
32018-05-07 20:26:21 UTCMateusz Konieczny "A 'description' tag is exactly the right place to list the amenities a park has to offer."

So why you moved them to note tag?
58769233 by
Mateusz Konieczny		12018-05-07 20:15:07 UTCmueschel This was not a 'mechanical edit'. I did it deliberately by hand. Undocumented tags are useless in OSM. And I'm very willing to communicate.
22018-05-07 20:24:59 UTCMateusz Konieczny "Undocumented tags are useless in OSM" - that is untrue. Frequently tags may be documented (I done it with many of them).
32018-05-07 20:25:21 UTCMateusz Konieczny "And I'm very willing to communicate." - and thanks for that!
58754503 by
mueschel		12018-05-07 20:02:17 UTCMateusz Konieczny Yes, it gives. It confirms that some foreign currencies may be withdrawn here.
22018-05-07 20:11:09 UTCmueschel There is a reason that currency:others=yes doesn't exist in the wiki. The only value is 'no', indicating that all currencies available are mentioned in the tags and none are missing.
32018-05-07 20:23:45 UTCMateusz Konieczny "There is a reason that currency:others=yes doesn't exist in the wiki."

You seem to think that only tags defined in wiki may be used. It is untrue.

It is useful to fix broken tags (as long as one verifies whatever edit makes sense and is not hiding serious issues), it is useful to de...
58754574 by
mueschel		12018-05-07 19:59:25 UTCMateusz Konieczny What was point of this edit?
22018-05-07 20:00:19 UTCMateusz Konieczny If you stuff everything into note tag - please, as minimum, ensure that produced note has no new typos.
32018-05-07 20:09:01 UTCmueschel The tag 'visible_in' is not in use elsewhere and not defined anywhere. A note on the other hand is shown in all editors to make any other mapper aware of the problem. I just moved the existing information to a place visible to others.
42018-05-07 20:21:30 UTCMateusz Konieczny "is not in use elsewhere and not defined anywhere" and? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like

note already existed, this tag only provided extra info

" note on the other hand is shown in all editors" - for start it is simply untrue.
58295618 by
mueschel		12018-05-07 19:54:24 UTCMateusz Konieczny Why you made this edit? Can you use edit description that explain why you made an edit?
22018-05-07 20:06:46 UTCmueschel There is no need for a new tag 'service_times:mass' - that's by definition 'service_times'.
32018-05-07 20:18:40 UTCMateusz Konieczny see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-April/035869.html for explanation

please, do not remove tags just because you do not understand why somebody added them
58721013 by
Tamerdab		12018-05-07 11:08:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "recycling:recycling:glass_bottles". Please update the app.

Jan
22018-05-07 11:50:56 UTCTamerdab There ls new update, and update it last night. And I’ll send email to the team of go map to check that problem, thanks 🙏
32018-05-07 12:00:41 UTCmueschel Perfect, this was the reason for the update yesterday, see: https://github.com/bryceco/GoMap/issues/122
42018-05-07 23:55:28 UTCTamerdab Oh great 👍, there is more to add to the app , and it’s a very great app to mapping. It’s simple and easy, not like JOSM . 😊
My aiming for now Is to add all the Embassy’s here on Israel with Full details , so it’s can help tourist And visitors And make there l...
58721404 by
Pierre_Tacheron		12018-05-07 11:11:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "payment:payment:cash". Please update the app.

Jan
58738860 by
Netmajor		12018-05-07 11:11:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "payment:payment:cash". Please update the app.

Jan
58675907 by
Ogmios		12018-05-07 11:11:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "payment:payment:cash". Please update the app.

Jan
58719337 by
Taw Ka Hlaing		12018-05-07 11:10:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "payment:payment:cash". Please update the app.

Jan
58724168 by
4004		12018-05-07 11:09:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
your version of GoMap has a bug and produces invalid tags like "communication:communication:mobile_phone". Please update the app.

Jan
22018-05-07 15:10:31 UTC4004 Thanks for spotting Jan, fixed
58723868 by
Sven2603		12018-05-07 11:07:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
deine Version von GoMap hat einen Bug und produziert falsche Tags wie "recycling:recycling:glass_bottles".
58700585 by
Uwenr5		12018-05-06 18:11:29 UTCmueschel Hallo,
das Tag "goods:conditions:maxweight" gibt es nicht. Was ist da genau vor Ort ausgeschildert?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25361693

Wahrscheinlich ist
maxweight = 5 oder
maxweight:hgv = 5 richtig.
58706870 by
reinmanu		12018-05-05 13:02:47 UTCreinmanu fuck...made a little mistake and put for the key "emergency" not "fire_hydrant" and instead "hydrant"

Is it possible to delete this data again?
22018-05-05 13:16:05 UTCreinmanu i think i fixed it...just renamed them
32018-05-06 11:27:51 UTCmueschel Hallo,
woher stammen diese Daten? "knowledge" ist es wohl eher nicht. Bitte denke immer daran, dass alle externen Quellen unter einer Lizenz stehen müssen, die mit der ODbL von OSM kompatibel ist.
Gruß, Jan
42018-05-06 14:34:25 UTCreinmanu Hallo Jan,
Die Daten wurden von uns als Feuerwehr erhoben und bereits in internen Karten verwendet,und von uns hier zur Verfügung gestellt.
52018-05-06 16:00:25 UTCmueschel Gut, bei selbst erhobenen Daten gibt es keine Lizenzprobleme. Am besten immer direkt im changeset mit angeben, dann gibt es da keine Unklarheiten.
Über das Tagging solltest du / ihr nochmal drüberschauen:

X_COORD = 17645.679
Y_COORD = 22021.8273
Diese Tags gehören nicht in OSM,...
62018-05-06 19:45:14 UTCreinmanu Vielen Dank für die Anregungen!

Die Koordinatetags werde ich entfernen, und den Rest anpassen, ist mir anscheinend irgendwo durchgerutscht.
Lt. dem Wikieintrag habe ich mir gedacht das die Position hier hineinkommt, note gibts da nicht.
Weißt du zufällig ob note auch von der ope...
58569620 by
Chieftl		12018-05-03 18:19:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're using tags like "roof:shape:south" on these buildings. Unfortunately, this tag is not really useful, as it is not defined in the wiki. If you want to have such a detailed mapping of roof shapes, you have to work with building:parts. I'm sure you can find some examples in this l...
22018-05-03 19:20:47 UTCChieftl Hi
Thanks for note.
I was studying OSM Wiki before adding this tag, but I didn't found how to map roof which has different type on opposite sides (hipped/gabled in this case).
I am not sure that it is possible by splitting building to building:parts because of center connection of building:parts ...
32018-05-04 17:49:12 UTCmueschel I'm not a full expert on this, but it might be
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM-4D/Roof_table#Roofs_with_2_faces
roof:shape = side_hipped (521 times in OSM)
If you could provide a good image?
58633189 by
Harry Archer		12018-05-04 12:22:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way and its name tag?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462780880

Cheers, Jan
58642025 by
NKA_import		12018-05-04 12:00:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, there are many strange tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5594218128

Jan
22018-05-04 12:00:53 UTCmueschel and here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/585381319
32018-05-04 14:58:51 UTCNKA_import Thank you. Not sure how these got in. Fixed now.
58615498 by
Christian Sorkale		12018-05-04 11:43:05 UTCmueschel Hallo,
bitte schau mal im Wiki wie medizinische Einrichtungen getaggt werden müssen um nutzbar zu sein.
z.B. hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office=therapist

Gruß, Jan
58604913 by
Protoxenus		12018-05-04 11:36:51 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was heißt denn "survey_video = inside"? Das Tag gibt es bisher nicht.

Gruß, Jan
22018-05-04 18:31:10 UTCProtoxenus Hallo,
du hast natürlich Recht, das tag ist nicht sehr sinnvoll. War mit dem Mobiltelefon unterwegs (OsmAnd) und da ist die Auswahl der Vorlagen beschränkt. Habe es geändert. Danke für den Hinweis
Gruß Protoxenus
58584223 by
Wilmer Osario		12018-05-04 11:11:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node? Something went wrong with the name tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5590273055

Cheers, Jan
22018-05-05 22:52:27 UTCWilmer Osario Thanks, it's fixed
58575617 by
pieleric		12018-05-04 11:04:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added a charging_station here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5589750881

The tag should be amanity = charging_station, but for some reason it is
osmand_electricity_combined \t= charging

I saw this several times recently - this looks like some issue with the OsmAnd app. Could y...
22018-05-08 21:04:16 UTCpieleric Hi Jan,
Thanks for noticing. I'm using a development version of Osmand and that seems indeed to be a brand new bug... I'll inquiry more on the Osmand side to make sure this is fixed.

In the mean time, I've fixed all the (2) wrongly tagged charging stations that I had added.
58642952 by
Bemadji		12018-05-04 10:32:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I found the key "battiment" on several objects you added. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. "battiment" is not a defined tag. Please have a look to the Wiki to se...
58559023 by
Globeur		12018-05-03 17:36:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572074986
The tag "30=50" looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
58613136 by
fondolucy		12018-05-03 15:06:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many objects with tags like these:
Opening_hours=24_7
Photo=1524481337267.jpg
Village=Upper Kitheini
type_of_facility=Water pipeline
wb_pb:id=21640565
This information might be correct, but is rather useless - the tags don't follow any established tagging scheme and can not be und...
58612187 by
Kitone		12018-05-03 15:06:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many objects with tags like these:
Opening_hours=24_7
Photo=1524481337267.jpg
Village=Upper Kitheini
type_of_facility=Water pipeline
wb_pb:id=21640565
This information might be correct, but is rather useless - the tags don't follow any established tagging scheme and can not be und...
58524997 by
Astromath		12018-05-01 10:04:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the tags "waymark" and "control_number"? These are not used in any other place. If these are reference numbers, the usual tag is "ref:XYZ".

Cheers, Jan
22018-05-01 18:45:11 UTCAstromath I'm not sure what waymark and control_numbers are. The sites I got the info from did not define them (re: websites I entered). Maybe ref could be used for them, but I don't know how many characters can be used for that field.
32018-05-02 09:09:19 UTCmueschel If you don't know what they mean, they should not be in OSM.

Btw, what is the source of this data? It's missing in the changeset. Is this data available under a license compatible with ODbL?
42018-05-02 19:08:59 UTCAstromath The data is from the 2 websites I added. Both are public websites.
52018-05-02 19:53:34 UTCmueschel These might be public, but the data can not be used for OSM - their terms of use contain "private, non-commercial" use and "attribution" needed.

All data you got from these sites must be removed.
62018-05-03 13:58:49 UTCAstromath Ok. Removed the parts that are "private" use and only left in the parts that are "obvious" when looking at it from the street. I also left in the sculptor because that should be found in any record, especially the library.
58609511 by
Peter Agenga		12018-05-02 13:21:23 UTCmueschel Hi again,
please stop adding tags like these:

Opening_and_Closing_hours_002 \t= 24_7
Operational_status = non_operational
Photo = 1524652112048.jpg
Type = other
Type_of_facility = Water kiosk
Village = Nyunzu

It's wasted time of yours, because nobody can make any use of this data.
See a...
58557257 by
padvinder		12018-05-02 09:56:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way and its tracktype-tag?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584714074

Jan
22018-05-02 12:08:53 UTCpadvinder sorry! intussen gedaan. dank voor de oplettendheid.
58578899 by
Ale_Zena_IT		12018-05-02 09:01:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong with this import. There are about 200 ways without any useful tags, like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584868254
22018-05-02 09:14:11 UTCAle_Zena_IT Hi,
many thanks mueschel.
I have checked all of that but I've uploaded the wrong layer. Now it's corrected.
58526437 by
João Pedro Moura		12018-05-01 09:43:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
what does this way represent?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584381226
It doesn't have a valid tag. It's definitely not "landuse=residential". Is it a boundary?
22018-05-15 09:42:31 UTCwille oi, João Pedro

Não é necessário definir o contorno da cidade, isso pode ser gerado automaticamente a partir das ruas.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58526437
58550664 by
Peter Agenga		12018-05-01 09:26:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many objects with tags like these:
Opening_hours=24_7
Photo=1524481337267.jpg
Village=Upper Kitheini
type_of_facility=Water pipeline
wb_pb:id=21640565
This information might be correct, but is rather useless - the tags don't follow any established tagging schem...
58504234 by
jareklec		12018-04-30 11:13:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
"addr:city:" looks like a mistake.

Jan
22018-04-30 11:34:02 UTCjareklec Hi, I was also thinking about it, but according to this source <http://rawicz.e-mapa.net> is correct.
32018-04-30 11:48:04 UTCmueschel The city is really named "0375852"?
42018-04-30 11:57:23 UTCjareklec I apologize for the lack of focus, at this moment I corrected it, thanks for your attention.
52018-04-30 12:09:19 UTCmueschel Perfect. I tried to guess what you meant, but didn't come up with 'simc'.
58500195 by
Munro J-L		12018-04-30 10:14:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of this node? The tag you put on it doesn't tell anything.

Jan
58515092 by
Ashek		12018-04-29 14:58:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of all these "Total..." tags on this area?
This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look at the wiki about common tags.
Let us know in case you need help!

Jan
22018-04-29 15:03:45 UTCAshek Indeed, it indicates the total children/population of the mentioned area. Do you please suggest me how I can mention it. Thanks.
32018-04-29 15:16:38 UTCmueschel These are tags used in other places as well. At least the first two are also mentioned in the Wiki.

Total Population -> population
Total Household -> households
Total Children -> population:children

I don't know what the other tags mean, so I can't make a suggestion.
58495671 by
aboges26		12018-04-29 15:00:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded 9 small areas with just foreign tags like "Shape_len" like this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584093965

Was this a mistake? Could you check & fix this?

Jan
58460784 by
Fivea		12018-04-29 12:00:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many colour tags on bus_stops. Is this the colour / names of the bus lines stopping there? If so, this should be put to a "route_ref=*" tag.
Jan
58491615 by
James69		12018-04-28 17:05:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain what this node represents? Just some "white rabbit" keys and values don't describe it very well.

Thanks, Jan
22018-04-28 17:28:01 UTCJames69 Yes the White Rabbit is an upscale up-cycled resale shop
32018-04-28 17:47:00 UTCmueschel Ok, how about shop=second_hand? This is the best I can come up with at the moment and at least is a rough description.
I would also add a description=* tag stating exactly what you just wrote.
If they focus on some special kind of work, a craft=* tag could be fitting as well.

Jan
58463695 by
Topol23456		12018-04-28 17:30:18 UTCmueschel This changeset was reverted: Vandalism in form of various random tags
58465085 by
Bijay adhikari		12018-04-28 17:07:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain this node?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5242272044

Is it a governments office, or something about fish?
58436125 by
murble		12018-04-28 16:04:37 UTCmueschel Hi.
The two types of fuel, "fuel:98E5" and "fuel:Di" are new - could you check the wiki for common types and fix the tagging?

Cheers, Jan
58444756 by
Melsensp		12018-04-28 16:02:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
you added a node with two tags which are not common. This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look at the wiki about common
tags for shops or amenities.
Let us know in case you need help!

Jan\...
57880890 by
77TC - Denali		12018-04-09 10:45:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your edits I found the tags "working", "working ", "Working" and "Working ". Please make sure you use only lower case letters and no spaces in the key.
The same holds for the values, "Pole" should be "pole". Could you have a look ...
22018-04-10 20:24:12 UTCVlIvYur Hi everyone
The same for "MH ", "MH", "mh", "LED", "LED ", "NO", "no", "No", "yes", "Yes", "wall", "Wall"... just choose one and use it everywhen
Also strange lamp_model that loo...
32018-04-12 11:46:08 UTCmueschel I also doubt that all these street_lamps are actually in the mapped positions, there are places with 10 lights in a 10m x 10m area.
(Esri images seem to be up-to-date here)
42018-04-28 11:15:09 UTCmueschel There is no feedback and the tags and positions of the lamps seem suspicious. I opt for a revert of this data.
52018-04-29 19:16:26 UTCVlIvYur I think you are right
58344743 by
Raven Nahid		12018-04-24 13:06:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded several nodes with very strange tags.
For example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5574070315
Was that a mistake?

Jan
22018-04-28 11:12:48 UTCmueschel I reverted this changeset - there are no buildings with more than a kilometer size and no 100 km^2 riverbank here.
58087868 by
Horst Hugo		12018-04-27 13:40:30 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du benutzt hier den Key "roof:slope:direction" - dieser Key wurde 2015 nach einer Diskussion abgeschafft. Standard ist "roof:direction".
Würdest du das anpassen?

Gruß, Jan
58452613 by
marcotbs		12018-04-27 13:39:40 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du benutzt hier den Key "roof:slope:direction" - dieser Key wurde 2015 nach einer Diskussion abgeschafft. Standard ist "roof:direction".
Würdest du das anpassen?

Gruß, Jan
22018-04-28 10:49:38 UTCmarcotbs Ich ändere es im Verlauf der weiteren Verfeinerungen. Es scheint aber auch keinen Renderer zu geben welcher das Tag adäquat beachtet (F4M bspw. tut es nicht)
58410963 by
chaot1401		12018-04-25 18:27:31 UTCmueschel Hallo,
bitte benutze das name-Tag nicht für solche Beschreibungen.
Wenn du eine Sperrung des Weges angeben willst, geht das mit

access:conditional = no @ (Mar 14 - Aug 16)
57773023 by
chaot1401		12018-04-25 18:25:28 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM. Bitte nutze das "name" Tag nicht für Beschreibungen die kein Name sind. z.B. "roter, hellblauer und dunkelblauer Weg"

Wanderrouten und deren Schilder werden in OSM anders eingetragen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Wandern#Erfasse...
22018-04-26 11:54:02 UTCchaot1401 Hallo Jan,
das Naturschutzgebiet Drover Heide ist in mehrere, farblich markierte Wegstrecken eingeteilt. Wenn ich z.B. die komoot-App nutze, dann sagt mir mein Navi: bitte dem "roten, hellblauen und dunkelblauen Weg" folgen. Dann erkenne ich an der farblichen Markierung sofort, dass ich d...
32018-04-26 12:58:36 UTCParzelle13 Hallo, welche Wanderweg-Relationen bereits existieren kann man sich z.B. hier https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=1027136&map=13!50.7245!6.5734 ansehen. Dort sieht man auch ob diese vollständig sind oder nicht. Eine weitere möglichkeit wäre http://www.wanderreitkarte.de/\...
42018-04-26 15:00:56 UTCParzelle13 Hallo nochmal, ich habe mir mal den Info-Flyer Stand 2011 der Gemeinde Kreuzau angesehen http://www.kreuzau.de/fkt/downloads/wandern/Drover-Heide02-2011.pdf.
Die Namen der Wege lauten dort aber ganz anders. Ohne deren Zustimmung dürfen die Daten davon aber nicht übernommen werden. Also se...
58374734 by
kapsa		12018-04-25 14:37:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain this? What is a "lake trail" if it's not a path to walk on?
22018-04-25 16:04:05 UTCkapsa You are right but the earlier description referred to this segment as a "footpath" which I believe is something next to a road while a lake trail has a nature element. There is a tree covered trail all around this lake.
32018-04-25 16:39:19 UTCmueschel It was "highway=footway" - this is not related to a sidewalk (on the side of a road).
See the description in the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=footway

It's just a generic tag for a path which is mainly intended for pedestrians.

You can add further details us...
58364907 by
staytuned		12018-04-25 14:39:36 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du verwendest hier zweimal das Tag
"has_area_equivalent"
Das ist neu - kannst du erklären was du damit meinst?

Gruß, Jan
58363262 by
EliziR		12018-04-25 09:57:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of this tag?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5575320051
Ubach = bar

It looks like some mistake.
Cheers, Jan
22018-04-26 21:19:01 UTCEliziR Fixed. Thx!
58336420 by
amynyiri		12018-04-25 09:54:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582871803

It doesn't have any descriptive tag, just a name and something that looks like a mistake.

Jan
58392445 by
Bert Araali		12018-04-25 09:23:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are a few spelling mistakes of tags here - it's "height", not "heigth".
The same for building:height and roof:height.
It's "building", not "buildiing" or "builidng" or "biulding" etc.
On the first glance it's about 300 spellin...
22018-04-26 05:53:44 UTCBert Araali Hello Jan, also noticed it. I am using ID and trying out some new 3D and indoor tagging features. I am updating it the coming few days and will remove the typos. Thanks for the help.
58366786 by
Kolla6		12018-04-25 09:19:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong with this upload - there are 97 ways with very strange tags. Please check & fix it.

Jan
22018-04-26 01:20:06 UTCKolla6 Fixing the issue right away , thanks for the sharing the information, apologise for the mistake
32018-04-26 01:46:52 UTCKolla6 changes are done..Thanks
58341784 by
GerdHH		12018-04-24 13:11:54 UTCmueschel Ich nehme an 'lsn_ref' an diesen Knoten soll 'lwn_ref' heißen?

Gruß, Jan
22018-04-24 17:29:39 UTCGerdHH Nein, es ist ein kleiner Test rund um "mein Hotel". Zum Hintergrund siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Piste_Maps#Network_and_node_points
Auf dem Golsfjell orientiert man sich im Sommer und Winter mit getrennten Knotenpunktensystemen. Ich wollte mal schauen, ob die Renderer sc...
32018-04-24 17:47:18 UTCmueschel Dann ist ja in Ordnung - du hattest im changeset Kommentar nur lwn geschrieben, da lag die Vermutung nahe :)
58348798 by
Cavokld		12018-04-24 11:03:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
on 4 ways you added the tag "TypeGenealogieMDO" - was that a mistake?

Cheers, Jan
22018-04-25 10:42:36 UTCCavokld Oui c'était une erreur. C'est corrigé !
Merci
58301324 by
Night-Lord		12018-04-23 10:52:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
wenn die Brücke für PKW befahrbar ist, ist highway=path aber nicht richtig. Schaust du da mal nach?

Gruß, Jan
22018-04-23 15:15:20 UTCNight-Lord also dem openstreet Wiki ist es richtig weil ich temporary eingetragen habe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional)

Example 5: Cycleway closed for construction work
A cycleway will be closed for construction work. Suppose the cycleway is tagged as follows:\...
32018-04-23 15:19:13 UTCNight-Lord danach habe ich mich gerichtet wenn das falsch ist sollte es im Wiki auch mal Aktualisiert werden.
42018-04-23 15:28:49 UTCmueschel Deine temporary-Tags sind völlig in Ordnung.
Aber ein highway=secondary wird nicht zum highway=path nur weil es eine Baustelle ist.

Das Beispiel im Wiki ist für einen Radweg, der ohnehin schon ein highway=path ist.
52018-04-23 15:46:05 UTCNight-Lord oki dann änder ich das, danke für den Hinweis :)
58323492 by
sadeepta dh		12018-04-23 10:55:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "student:counts" to two schools - the correct spelling would be "student:count".
Could you check and fix these tags?

Thanks, Jan
58280873 by
liuxingy2017		12018-04-23 10:42:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
I noticed many new and undocumented "payment" tags. Please use only the documented tags, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment

Thanks, Jan
58287161 by
Freiheitsstute		12018-04-23 10:39:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du mal nach dem Tagging schauen? "recycling:exc" sieht nach einem Fehler aus.

Gruß, Jan
22018-04-23 21:21:02 UTCFreiheitsstute Ja, danke! Ist jetzt geändert. Da scheint mir leider ein Vertipper durchgerutscht zu sein - bei den vielen Müll-Arten irgendwie auch kein Wunder. :\\
Gruß, Rolf
58291165 by
serdrar tazarine		12018-04-22 10:31:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
Here you used two tags which are new and not used in any other place.

This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Only tags that are described in the OSM-Wiki can be used.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58...
51937053 by
anonym33		12018-04-22 10:14:45 UTCmueschel Hallo,
3 Wegstücke haben jetzt zwei access:conditional tags, unter anderem dieser: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447013725

Welcher davon stimmt?
access:conditional = no @ (Nov-May)
access:conditional_1 = no @ (oct-may)

Gruß, Jan
58287038 by
Victoire Séne		12018-04-22 10:11:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 43 nodes with the tag "Arbre = yes".
Please note that all keys you use to identify an object needs to be in English -
everything else is not understood by the software and is not shown on maps.

I guess you meant to use "natural = tree", see the Wiki:
https:...
58279150 by
Jim Schmidt		12018-04-21 10:14:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 409 objects with the tag
"Uploaded=56". This looks like a mistake.
Could you have a look and fix this?

Jan
57167092 by
KABIRAJ ROKAYA		12018-03-15 10:42:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded 165 objects with strange tags. Could you check and fix this?

AltMode=-1
Base=0.0
FolderPath=VCA-Nilkantha_VSO_Nepal.kmz/VCA-Nilkantha/Utilities/WATER BODIES
HasLabel=-1
LabelID=3
Name=Paani muhan -Chilaunabote
OID_=0
SymbolID=2
22018-04-20 17:54:53 UTCmueschel I removed the remaining useless tags like Base and AltMode.
58245350 by
susinita		12018-04-20 10:52:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

Here are a few remarks:
- please watch out for the correct spelling of tags, e.g. it's 'right', not 'rigt' and 'smoothness', not 'smothness'. I fixed several of these right now.

- I found several nodes with the tags kerb, kerb:both, kerb:left and kerb:right on the same n...
22018-04-20 21:33:11 UTCsusinita oh lord! Jan, I am soo sorry! really.
I am completely new. Sorry for not pay attention enough... It has been completely my fault.
(thank you for correcting me)
57920008 by
johanespeter9		12018-04-15 12:22:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
this changeset contains some tags with spelling mistakes. First of all, all tags, keys and values should use lower case letters. (Names do use upper case of course)

addr:Distirct -> addr:district (note the spelling mistake)
addr:Village -> addr:village
building:condition=Moderate -&g...
22018-04-19 18:20:17 UTCmueschel I started removing spelling mistakes in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58240787
58128582 by
6-ofps-tuapse		12018-04-19 10:37:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372094840
There are some strange fire-related tags.
Thanks, Jan
58175157 by
mueschel		12018-04-19 09:39:43 UTCNakaner Hallo mueschel,

meines Wissens nach haben UIC-Nummern einen anderen Aufbau als "de:08119:5960", oder? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4447883498/history

Viele Grüße

Michael
22018-04-19 09:55:15 UTCmueschel Hallo Michael,
das ist durchaus möglich. Diese Ergänzungen müssen ohnehin noch einmal überprüft werden, die Quelle kommt mir fragwürdig vor:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58181024

Jan
58165877 by
Shamillah		12018-04-18 08:00:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tag "health_professional=no" on many objects - what does it mean? This key has not been used in any other place yet.

Jan
22018-04-18 12:44:34 UTCShamillah Hello Jan,
that means that the health facilities in that area do not have a health professional.

Shamillah
32018-04-18 13:05:44 UTCmueschel Could you search for an established tag for this information? Otherwise this information is lost for all users who don't know this tag.
health_person:type=* might be a good choice.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0#health_person:type.3D.2A_.2F_office.3D.2A
42018-04-18 14:12:39 UTCShamillah Sure thing Jan. Will discuss with my team and make appropriate changes. Thank you for the insight :)
57886376 by
NickNicky		12018-04-18 11:32:59 UTCmueschel Hallo,
hast du eine schriftliche Genehmigung vom VVM um diese Daten zu verwenden? In OSM dürfen nur Daten verwendet werden, die unter einer mit ODbL kompatiblen Lizenz stehen. Das ist hier laut Webseite nicht der Fall.
58181024 by
NickNicky		12018-04-18 11:30:51 UTCmueschel Hallo,
hast du eine schriftliche Genehmigung von bwegt.de um diese Daten zu verwenden? In OSM dürfen nur Daten verwendet werden, die unter einer mit ODbL kompatiblen Lizenz stehen. Das ist hier laut Webseite nicht der Fall.
58181130 by
Svein Olav		12018-04-18 08:02:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these objects have tags like
"Source:date = 20130720" - in general, keys should be lower case and the date should be in a common format like
"source:date = 2013-07-20" Would you mind changing that?

Jan
58159205 by
ashmapper		12018-04-18 07:59:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the (only) tag "huts = yes" on several objects - what does that mean? This tag is not used by anybody else at the moment.

Thanks, Jan
58127396 by
poornibadrinath		12018-04-17 17:25:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
you and your colleagues add nodes like this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5555758243

These should not appear in OSM. I suspect there is some error in your common workflow when doing QA. Could you please check this?

Jan
58092691 by
Reclus		12018-04-17 13:11:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Tagging schauen, das sieht nach einem Fehler aus:
"building:black = good"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579894123

Jan
58136210 by
Pitoresker Pi		12018-04-17 09:10:32 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier zwei Tags benutzt, die es so bisher nicht gibt, ref:color_bg und ref:color_tx. Ich würde empfehlen, auf "osmc:symbol" zurückzugreifen - das wird insbesondere bei Symbolen auf Wegweisern verwendet, und es gibt Anwendungen die das unterstützen.
58152040 by
Max--		12018-04-17 09:07:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "arialway" on 58 objects - could you fix the spelling mistake, it should be "aerialway".

Grüße,
Jan
22018-04-17 13:24:32 UTCMax-- Oh, what a stupid typo, did not spot it while reapplying the key those 58 times in JOSM. Should have fixed all of them now, but will make sure I check later!

Gruss,
Max
32018-04-18 09:46:24 UTCMax-- Checked it with overpass-turbo, no more arialways left....

Thanks for spotting it!
58132388 by
mueschel		12018-04-16 11:47:35 UTCTomas Straupis Reverted. name->waterway:name was done on purpose because at this point it is a reservoir, not a stream/river.
22018-04-16 12:02:13 UTCmueschel At all other lakes I know the usual "name" and "alt_name" tags are used. What is your reason to use other tags here? If it is just to avoid displaying the name on the map, this is "mapping for the renderer" and heavily discouraged.

Your tags are not documented anywhe...
32018-04-16 12:08:58 UTCTomas Straupis I've already added a local (Lithuanian) rule so that streams/rivers should not have name tag when intersecting natural=water, looking at what happens and planning to extend this to landuse=reservoir.
Reason is that there is no stream/river at that point, name is not required (because lake/reservoir...
42018-04-16 12:19:39 UTCmueschel That's exactly what Drafts are for in the Wiki - describing what you intent to do so that other mappers can comment on it. I'm not sure that all users of this data agree with your point of view.
52018-04-16 12:27:27 UTCTomas Straupis Well we (Lithuanian mappers) are discussing it in pubs... I've added a lot of river/stream ways to connect water basins, this introduced duplicate names, so I'm looking for the ways to solve this. Alternative would be to remove waterway=river/stream tag altogether. Or removing name tag.
As per wiki...
62018-04-16 12:37:13 UTCmueschel I'm not a user of river and stream data, so I can't say something specific. Only thing I know is that OSM is an international project and all changes to tagging need to be discussed openly with everybody involved. A pub is not the right place, that's why we have the Wiki, whether you like it or not....
72018-04-16 13:05:41 UTCTomas Straupis I have explained which problems I'm solving. I need other specific/practical problems to be able to adjust my decisions. This is the reason why I'm doing a change and waiting for a loooong time for other possible problems to rise.
34638163 by
Papilli		12018-04-16 12:13:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this highway? The tag "waterway:name" looks suspicious.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210083669

Jan
58065163 by
Sia Saronga		12018-04-16 10:28:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I saw some uncommon tags in your edits like these:
Building Age = Recent (post 2000)
Name of City = Dar es Salaam
Name of the ward = Kigogo
Steet Name = Mkwajuni
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data...
58042058 by
guillemmal		12018-04-16 09:51:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this waterway? The tag 'brie=yes' looks like a mistake.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579345704

Cheers, Jan
58107825 by
zVID		12018-04-16 09:11:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw that you added tags like
height:2017.06 = 0,9 to trees and hedges.
I do have a few comments on that:

- dates have to be given as "YYYY-MM-DD", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Date_namespace
- the decimal separator is a dot: "0.9"
- ther...
58024958 by
UncleHank		12018-04-15 15:12:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are two ways that got the tag "revf = CR 1654" - this looks like a mistake, could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22018-04-15 21:22:38 UTCUncleHank You are correct. It was a mistake. That's what I get when I work on these maps late at night.
58061915 by
Anicet Gabé		12018-04-15 14:25:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used a strange tag on some of these nodes: "_Localisation_de_la_structure_precision". Could you explain what it means?
57993964 by
dikkeknodel		12018-04-15 14:24:07 UTCmueschel Could you check this butcher? Something went wrong with the name tag.

Cheers, Jan
22018-04-16 09:57:20 UTCdikkeknodel Indeed, something went wrong. I've restored the name.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225609532
57907852 by
Cooking 15610		12018-04-13 10:47:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "borne = yes" here - this is new. What does it mean?

Cheers, Jan
22018-04-14 08:33:38 UTCCooking 15610 Hello,
Sorry, my english is rather bad. It was installed a long time ago in purpose to prevent cars to go this way (Caen to Bretteville sur Odon)
Cheers
32018-04-14 15:01:35 UTCmueschel I didn't know the word "borne" and Google Translate also didn't...

I think "barrier = bollard" is what you are looking for, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
42018-04-14 18:25:15 UTCCooking 15610 This is exactly what you think.
52018-04-14 18:26:17 UTCmueschel Perfect, I'll change the tag.

Happy mapping!
58073101 by
DMyriam1990		12018-04-14 18:23:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "sourcename" on this road - the correct key would be "source:name". I fixed it right now.
Cheers, Jan
58018610 by
valerietheblonde		12018-04-14 14:52:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
you have imported some ways with only foreign tags. Could you check that?
E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579046367
57961440 by
sergey2psch		12018-04-13 13:06:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several hydrants with the tag "sostoyanie =исправен" - this looks like a mistake. Maybe "working=yes" would be a replacement?

Jan
49067413 by
frederic ademola		12017-06-03 13:43:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
these wells contain quite some foreign tags. E.g. lon and lat should not appear as tags in OSM, keys should not use capital letters. Could you have a look and correct this?

Cheers, Jan
22018-04-13 11:12:00 UTCmueschel I deleted those tags now.
mueschel has contributed to 500 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 963 comment(s) (limit: 500 changesets)