Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-10-20 11:12:33 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier an ein paar Schildern das Tag "arrow:direction" verwendet, das es bisher nicht gibt.
Ich schlage vor, das auf 'destination:arrow' zu ändern, wie es zusammen mit destination-Tags schon einige Male verwendet wird.
Gruß, Jan
12017-10-19 21:10:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check some of the buildings you added? 30 got the tag "building levels = ..." which should be "building:levels". Could you fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-10-18 13:56:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you invented a new tag here, "NBI Struture number', including spelling mistakes. I think that a tag following established tagging schemes would be bette4, e.g. ref:nbi. What do you think?

Jan
12017-10-18 12:53:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
what do you mean by 'cycles' here? Bicycle or motorcycle?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532650535#map=16/-37.8383/145.6264

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-18 23:39:26 UTCcleary I have changed tag to "bicycle" - was my error. Thanks for noticing and bringing it to my attention.
12017-10-18 12:43:00 UTCmueschel There is someone producing stones working in this place? Please check the wiki what tags mean:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft
12017-10-18 10:02:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way, it got a strange tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75538450#map=19/50.83167/5.89233

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-18 10:28:15 UTCAllroads Done, renamed, thanks.
12017-10-17 19:18:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded more than 50 buildings with the t "builing". Could you have a look and fix this spelling mistake?

Cheers, Jan
12017-10-17 19:17:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded more than 60 buildings with the t "bulding". Could you have a look and fix this spelling mistake?

Cheers, Jan
12017-10-16 17:37:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84501093
"16=Le Cercle Pointu" looks like a wrong tag.
Cheers, Jan
12017-10-16 10:45:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the surface tag here?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217793776

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-16 11:39:15 UTCCz ja Thanks! My mistake, I corrected it. Regards.
12017-10-15 15:41:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4690323989
What is the meaning of this tag: "name:தமqbaylitழ்", I haven't seen this before.

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-15 15:47:04 UTCNeechalkaran corrected
12017-10-15 11:05:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the tag " prpois:barrio"? This hasn't been used before. To me it looks like it could be something like "addr:suburb".

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-16 15:05:06 UTCvramirez122000 Puerto Rico Municipalities are divided into "barrios". These POIs were geocoded using a simple scheme of Road# KM. The barrio field was used to manually validate the quality of the geocode. That was the theory anyway. In a few cases, the Road KM was just an "idea" of more or less...
12017-10-15 11:02:34 UTCmueschel Hallo,
das Tag "service:bicycle:..." ist nicht dazu gedacht, alle möglichen Dinge aufzulisten die man kaufen kann. Dafür gibt es z.B. brand=
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand

Gruß, Jan
12017-10-15 10:53:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check these edits? E.g. I can't find this 200 meter long house on any satellite images. The street also seems to be in a different position.
Thanks, Jan
12017-10-15 10:48:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
you invented some new tags here:
|ODS \t=true
|ODS:secondaryaddress =false
Could you explain there meaning? Or where they added by mistake?

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-15 16:36:00 UTCJanWandelaar They are there by mistake.
I forgot to delete them.
12017-10-15 10:39:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used 3 shop tags here, which do not have any of the common values. Please check the wiki to find some matching tags - free-text values for shop tags are not supported by any OSM software.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop

Cheers, Jan
12017-10-13 07:33:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
I don't think that the OSM database is the right place to collect information on pot holes, using no established tags to describe them. Please co sider using a dedicates service for this, for example umap.

Jan
12017-09-14 10:16:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key 'ff' here - this looks like a spelling mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-11 19:47:06 UTCmtbbiker99 Maybe. I can not open 51679515. Can you fix it. Thanks and nice greetings from Oliver.
32017-10-12 07:45:18 UTCmueschel Unfortunately I don't know how to fix it - it looks like a second osmc:symbol:

ff = black:black:white_triangle_line
osmc:symbol = yellow:black:yellow_diamond
12017-10-11 14:48:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
was hat es denn mit diesem Gebiet auf sich?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531321377
"original=yes" ist wenig aussagekräftig.
Jan
12017-10-11 12:22:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used tags like 'maxspeed:forward:hgv' here - the tag normally used is 'maxspeed:hgv:forward' - first the transportation mode, then the direction. Would you mind changing that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-11 12:24:49 UTCdaltux Sure, will do, thanks
12017-10-11 09:50:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added all these nodes with Russian keys and tags - please change them to usual OSM tags like they are documented in the wiki. Currently all these tags can not be used by any software.

Jan
22017-10-12 14:25:40 UTCHarald Hartmann And please check
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5155432278
and it's duplicate
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5155321352
12017-10-11 09:48:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several areas with only foreign tags and no common OSM tags. E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530774417
The actual suburb is already existing in OSM and mapped properly.

Jan
22017-10-15 10:02:57 UTCChrissW-R1 Please have a look at the already existing data!
You added the boundary of Yedikule again and again. But there is already one with right tagging:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7648813
Also please reuse the already existing nodes with the same position. This changesets looks like automat...
12017-10-11 09:44:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of "bushwood=yes" here?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530779340
This tag is new. Maybe natural=wood?
Jan
12017-10-11 09:41:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
du hast hier 'surface' entfernt und durch "descriptio1 \tLärmschutzwand" ersetzt:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25465819
War das ein Versehen?
Gruss, Jan
22017-10-11 20:33:14 UTCbigbug21 Ja, das war es. Danke für den Tipp.
12017-10-10 07:32:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added this tag on several ways:
access:lanes:conditional = ||designated @ (Mo-Fr 05:30-09:00)
I guess this should be 'no' instead of 'designated' as the lane is closed to non-psv traffic.

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-17 12:05:16 UTCKelerei Thanks for the heads-up! Fixed in changeset #53009624.
12017-10-08 16:24:49 UTCmueschel Hallo,
deine Ergänzungen sehen auf den ersten Blick gut aus. Eine Anmerkung habe ich aber: Du hast die Position der Gebäude nach Bing-Bildern verschoben - diese scheinen hier aber leider einen Versatz zu haben, d.h. die Position hat vorher besser gestimmt. Tipp: Schau dir die Gegend nochm...
12017-10-08 16:16:35 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM. Die Ergänzung von "hgv=yes" wäre nicht notwendig gewesen - Straßen sind zunächst einmal frei, nur Ausnahmen von der Regel (z.B. eine Wohnstraße auf der keine LKW fahren dürfen) müssen extra angegeben werden.
Und: Bitte verwe...
12017-10-08 13:26:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
are you sure that this really is a "viewing point"? On mapillary, this looks like a small rock, but not like a place where you can enjoy the view across a landscape.
12017-10-07 03:30:31 UTCelifz SOURCE: Mapillary
COMS2200A
22017-10-08 13:19:13 UTCmueschel Please be careful where to put tags. This way is definitely not a waste_basket, but some kind of footway.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377683291
12017-10-08 13:18:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
please have a look to the tagging here, this tag doesn't make much sense:
"collection_times = Cigarette disposal"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5136595692
12017-10-07 03:29:40 UTCelifz Source: Mapillary
COMS2200A
22017-10-08 13:16:31 UTCmueschel Please be careful where to put tags. This building is definitely not a "amenity=bench", but a building.
Cheers, Jan
12017-10-08 13:15:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're adding very detailed information here:
recycling:Coffee_cups_(wax_lined)=yes
recycling:Food_soiled_pizza_boxes=yes
recycling:Other_soiled_paper_products=yes
recycling:Tissues_and_paper_towels_(soiled_or_clean)=yes

Unfortunately, this is not how OSM tags work. The key can not conta...
12017-10-04 12:49:01 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello Chrisss Gü. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64095894
you have tagged
`abandonend:leisure` instead of
`abandoned:leisure`, right?
#typo
22017-10-07 17:56:51 UTCmueschel Und am Weg http://osm.org/way/191293352 hast du zwei neue access Tags erfunden,
access:official = no
access:physical = yes
Was möchtest du damit ausdrücken?
Gruß, Jan
32017-10-11 21:02:07 UTCChrisss Gü na prinzipiell steht da ein Schild dass das Betreten aufgrund möglicher Gefahren infolge der Braunkohletagebaue nicht betreten werden darf. Da er aber mitten im Wohngebiet liegt, rege genutzt wird, nicht wie sonst hier üblich mit Zaun versperrt ist und ein asphaltierter Radweg ist, hab ich...
12017-10-04 12:59:15 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello Yuuki Satou. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3784811219 you have introduced the new key `banner_url`. What is it for? Or is it some SEO-Spam? Then please remove it! #newkey
22017-10-04 15:19:30 UTCfreebeer Also,
name Musée de cote d'ivoire
name:en Musée de cote d'ivoireも
The ``english'' name is in french and in addition contains a non-US-ASCII trailing symbol. I do not know the correct proper name, but a translation could be ``Ivory Coast Museum'' or similar.
And,
...
32017-10-07 17:54:47 UTCmueschel 'banner_url' was not added on purpose. That is an old bug in maps.me that has been fixed since a long time.
12017-10-06 09:41:22 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello mdelatorre. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425224332
you have tagged
`Vega del Heno`.
What is it for? Please keep in mind: keys should be in english ;-)
22017-10-07 11:15:36 UTCmueschel That's a copy and paste error of the name. Fixed it according to source of this changeset.
32017-10-12 05:07:48 UTCmdelatorre My mistake. It was a residential street as you have already fixed. :-)
12017-10-06 11:09:30 UTCmueschel Servus,
den Key 'no_stopping' gibt es bis jetzt nicht. Das geht mit parking:lane = no_stopping.

Grüße, Jan
22017-10-06 13:43:53 UTCgeri-oc Habe es so geändert - obwohl ich es "einfach" einfacher finde, auch für die Auswertung.
PS: habe auch das no_parking "umgemodelt".
Gruß Gerd
12017-10-06 10:54:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "smoothness:lanes" on 10 roads.
On two-way roads, it should be smoothness:lanes:forward or smoothness:lanes:backward. Just :lanes can only be used on oneway streets. Would you mind changing this, as I don't know which lane your tag refers to.

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-06 11:04:01 UTCsamuelrussell Cheers. Can fix. I remember mapping all the lanes left to right in the direction of the way, so easy to split into :forward…
12017-10-05 19:00:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
du hast hier das Tag
"maxspeed:condition = Mo-Fr 07:00-17:00" verwendet. Das müsste zum einen "conditional" heißen und es fehlt die Angabe, welche Geschwindigkeit im angegebenen Zeitraum gilt.
Korrekte Schreibweise wäre beispielsweise:

maxspeed:conditi...
12017-10-03 13:06:56 UTCmueschel Hallo Carsten,
du hast hier an 11 Ladestationen das Tag "socket:type:output=22000" verwendet - das gibt es so nicht. 'type' müsste gegen den jeweiligen Steckertyp ausgetauscht werden. Außerdem würde ich empfehlen, die Werte als "22kW" zu schreiben, das macht es e...
22017-10-03 20:27:57 UTCCarsten Güse Hallo Jan,
ich habe mich eigentlich nur an die JOSM-Vorlage (Transport/Auto/Elektrotankstelle) und dessen Wiki-Beschreibung gehalten:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=charging_station

Dort gibt es den Tag "socket:type:output=Watt - die Leistung dieses Steckers". Wie h...
32017-10-03 21:10:18 UTCCarsten Güse Nachtrag:
In der weiteren Beschreibung der Ladestation soll tatsächlich die Leistung in kW angegeben werden. Das setzt sich in den Beispielen fort. Generell also: Wert + Einheit.
Allerdings steht bei der Stromstärke "amperage" nur ein Wert, z. B. "32".Also ohne Einhei...
42017-10-04 08:23:47 UTCmueschel Bei socket:type:output schau mal genau hin, 'type' ist kursiv gesetzt, soll also ersetzt werden. Deswegen auch det Hinweis dabei 'es kann mehrere Typen geben', dann braucht es diese Unterscheidung. Bei Einheiten: einfach mit angeben, dann ist klar was gemeint ist. kW ist aber die gängigste.
Gr...
52017-10-04 10:12:41 UTCCarsten Güse Ist beides geändert.
Danke für den Hinweis.
Gruß Carsten
12017-10-03 17:10:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the new tag "pick-your-own=yes" on some nodes - I suggest to use the widely used key "self_service" instead.
Cheers, Jan
22017-10-03 18:26:27 UTCfreebeer Hallo,
I have not checked the uses for self_service, but I see it as different from pick-your-own as I know it:
self-service as I understand is where produce has been picked, but you obtain it from an unattended stand, with no fixed opening hours or other complications.
Which is different from my...
32017-10-03 19:21:36 UTCmueschel self_service is used on e.g. fuel stations, do-it-yourself workshops or canteens without waiters.

Yes, sure there is a difference, but it should be clear what it means due to the landuse =farmland. If the berries were already picked, you would put a node and tag it as shop.

self_service = yes...
42017-10-10 04:46:35 UTCDevonF It's nice to re-use keys and not create new ones, but I think freebeer makes a good point. Self_service=* is a little too ambiguous and there are many possible combinations of tags to be able to easily exhaustively search them. For example it could be applied to landuse=orchards, farmland, greenhous...
12017-10-03 17:08:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this building? roof:shape_1 =50 looks like a mistake.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263460985

Cheers, Jan
12017-10-03 13:17:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
is "Карка-Шур" the name of this stream?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211515586

Jan
22017-10-03 16:08:01 UTCBSV9 Hi !
Thank you for the error message. Correct name is "Каркашур". I fixed it.
12017-10-03 13:03:40 UTCmueschel Kannst du hier mal nach den Daten der Landebahnen schauen? Die ref an den Bahnen scheint nicht zu stimmen.
Und das Tag 'apro' an diesem Node ist auch neu (hatte ich zwischenzeitlich fälschlicherweise geändert in 'apron')
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5089791109/history

Gruß,...
12017-09-16 11:41:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? Something went wrong with the ref tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521142317
"X622=S285"

Thanks, Jan
22017-10-03 08:41:01 UTCCENTRALHUB The secondary road (X622 you mentioned) should be the old S285.

The new S285 (the primary road) is newly built, but is not fully completed on the map yet.

Several online map in China tag both of them as S285.

Once we finish the primary road I believe that we can remove the ref tag from th...
32017-10-03 09:52:38 UTCmueschel Thanks for replying,
If I understand right, we can change the tag ""X622=S285" to "old_ref = S285", "ref = X622"?
42017-10-03 16:46:04 UTCCENTRALHUB I think we should only do "old_ref=S285", because we cannot confirm that it's X622.
12017-09-22 08:48:51 UTCwoodpeck Hello PC10, these data imports are faulty (they introduce bad keys and they have over-noded, pseudo-precise geometries that seem to come from converting a raster map to vectors). Before you import anything more, please consult the import guidelines at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidel...
22017-09-22 10:23:14 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52269395, 52270300, 52269682, 52271305, 52270647, 52271642, 52270992, 52268780, 52269993, 52269109 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from PC10, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52...
32017-10-02 18:54:42 UTCmueschel Hi PC10, hi woodpeck,
there are many more nodes and areas imported since, including newly invented tags (aream2, LCC, proyecto, ...). It also seems that most features do not correspond to actual features in the satellite images - e.g. forest multipolygons have the largest trees excluded, borders do...
42017-10-04 08:23:23 UTCwoodpeck Yes they should. We know nothing about the source - it is claimed that there's some community project - but the data suffers from geometry anomalies and bad tagging and the import hasn't been discussed. I am deleting the data now and have asked PC10 to discuss any further plans on the imports list.
12017-10-02 18:34:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please explain the meaning of alt_name:mcm? :mcm is the language code of Malaccan Creole Portuguese, which is very unlikely to be spoken in Moscow.
Jan
22017-10-02 18:51:51 UTCevgenykatyshev Hi. This tags was imorted by Moscow Transport Department. I first removed all ща them but later revert deletetion for end of discussion. Russian community is discussing about this data on forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php
12017-10-02 09:38:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
on 71 nodes you added some new keys:
is_in:dist=Ilam
is_in:vdc=Shantipur
These are not used in other places. I guess that the first one can be replaced with the more common is_in:district; but I don't know what to the second key refers to. Could you check this?

Cheers, Jan

22017-10-02 11:08:12 UTCWojtekK Hello Jan, right - is_in:dist will be replaced with is_in:district, VDC is shortcut for Nepal administrative unit (Village Development Comitee).
12017-10-01 10:58:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
is there a difference between disabled_motor_vehicle and disabled_vehicle, or do they describe the same category?
Jan
22017-10-01 12:44:26 UTCAllroads The hierarchy is disabled_vehicle, then subcategory disabled_ motor_ vehicle,
The wiki is not completed but C9 C15, disabled_vehicle, C13 disabled_motor_vehicle ( not a moped), C14, new key needed. Subcatergory, should be a not motorized disabled vehicle as a key ( i do not have yet found a logi...
32017-10-01 13:47:28 UTCmueschel Alright, I wasn't sure if this difference was a mistake or on purpose.
Thanks, Jan
12017-09-20 15:34:14 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello Tomas Straupis. E.g. at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4325643440 you have add the new (and so far unkown and undocumented) key `subitem`. What is it for? #newkey
22017-09-21 07:13:01 UTCTomas Straupis It is a „test/temporary“ tag. What I'm trying to solve is this: there are a number of points tagged as historic=memorial in one small area while in practice it is one big memorial. I'm trying to filter out micro-mapped memorials. subitem=yes helps with this filtering, but I'm not fully h...
32017-10-01 11:05:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
additional point: Please don't use the name tag for description, like here:
name =Memorialas
name:de =Gedenkstätte
name:en =Memorial
name:pl =Miejsce pamięci

It is sufficient to use historic = memorial and its subtags to describe the object in a machine-readable way.
42017-10-01 11:29:06 UTCTomas Straupis Hi, I did not not add these pointless names. Previous editor Jay May did. I'm still thinking of a good way of removing these points altogether (or reducing to something less prominent like tourism=artwork).
12017-10-01 10:53:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way and the adjacent one?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135636085

The key "nb_marches" looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-03 17:26:07 UTCgsimon Thanks, I fixed. Gaël
12017-09-30 11:29:48 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ist das hier wirklich ein Radweg mit blauem Schild? Wenn du ihn als highway=cycleway einträgst, heißt das, dass hier weder Fußgänger, noch Traktoren noch Pferde erlaubt sind. Ist das vor Ort wirklich so?

Gruß, Jan
12017-09-30 09:45:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please explain your edits on hotels? The changeset comment should contain some reasonable description of what you did.

The source you give doesn't exist. "mapk.in" is an empty web page.


In other changesets, you added the same objects several times, e.g. http://www.o...
22017-09-30 15:02:19 UTCcat_crash Hi,
we are piloting on integration OSM with our cloud solution helps venues keep OSM data up-to-date.
New key will be introduced in accordance with process or removed after piloting. Please notice - we are piloting only on 2 venues. No any mass loads will be done
12017-09-22 11:21:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you give some details on this restriction? "except = Transit vehicle" is not a common tag, and there is a stray ':' in 'restriction'.
Who is allowed to turn here?

Jan
22017-09-29 11:27:14 UTCIqhra Hi Jan,
Thanks for getting back I have been adding the restriction using street level imagery and the board below is stating that it is not allowed to take u turn except transit vehicles. So I went ahead and tagged them following what I see what I map. It would be great if local knowledge mappers...
32017-09-29 11:49:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
thanks for replying. That is 'transit' as in 'public transit'? (Sorry, I'm not from the US and don't know terminology..). That would be "except = bus", which is buses used in public transit, but not coaches.
Jan
42017-10-01 07:43:06 UTCIqhra Hi,
Thanks for getting back. I tagged it based on the sign board i see in the street level imagery ( even I am not form US). It would be great if you can go ahead and make changes as per your knowledge if it needs any correction.
regards,
Iqhra
12017-09-29 10:42:57 UTCmueschel Hallo,
"tracktype track=detached" ist kein gängiges Tag - was möchtest du damit ausdrücken?
Gruß, Jan
22017-09-29 17:31:37 UTCgeocodec Danke für den Hinweis, ein Makro meines Logitech G13 Gamepad macht aktuell Probleme.
12017-09-29 10:28:34 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du schreibst hier
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5110955621
parkin_space =disused

Meinst du vielleicht capacity:disabled?
Jan
12017-09-29 08:21:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check the tags on this hospital?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481184320
All keys have to be in English as they are described in the Wiki. I guess you meant to add health_specialty tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0/Specialties

C...
12017-09-29 08:16:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these nodes have only foreign tags and no tags that are common to OSM. Where they uploaded by mistake?

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-29 18:58:35 UTCHarald Hartmann Or is it an import?
12017-09-28 12:02:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're adding a huge number of new and undocumented tags on these objects (listed below). Please clean this up. The number of nodes on each object also seems to be much too high - especially those half-circular shapes.

LCC \tA12-A2-A6
aream2 \t97530.06567
date \t1-spt-2017
escala \t1:25k\...
22017-10-04 16:13:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-09-26 10:26:46 UTCmueschel Hi samuel,
the key "ups" is new - could you explain its meaning?
The key "ramp:pram" is new as well.

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-26 11:25:38 UTCsamuelrussell Cheers mate for your work.

ramp:pram is a cultural error on my part. The ramps are called "pram ramps" in Australian road design, and the regular tag "ramp:stroller" is an Americanism. I will of course correct to common usage. It obviously represents a vehicle access suitabil...
12017-09-26 10:16:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you have used the tag "school way = yes" on this area and some buildings - could you explain the meaning? It is not a common tag. If this is a school, the correct tag is "amenity = school".
Cheers, Jan
12017-09-08 10:31:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some tags like psv:turn:lanes here. I think this should be turn:psv:lanes.

The main key is turn (you want to tag turn lanes), and the transportation mode is "psv". This is the same order like e.g. in maxspeed:hgv

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-25 18:33:36 UTCVentlan Hello,
you might be right, though I could not find any documentation regarding this kind of combination of tags. I will need to think about it.
Regards.
32017-09-25 18:48:11 UTCmueschel Comprehensive documentation is really a problem. In general the order for almost all tags is:
key[:subkey][:hgv|:bicycle|...][:lanes][:forward|:backward|:both_ways][:conditional]

I tried to compile a summary of keys and possible suffixes, but I didn't take the time to translate it to English yet...
42017-09-30 19:19:32 UTCVentlan Ok, all changed, thanks for bringing it up.
12017-09-24 10:14:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node? Is "Bottu" the name? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5091549514

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-24 10:33:09 UTCSL_Mapper Yes, invalid key corrected.

Thanks.
12017-09-22 20:19:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
willkommen bei OSM!
Zwei Anmerkungen zu deiner Änderung habe ich: Die Breite hast du als "1,5" angegeben - OSM verwendet die englische Schreibweise mit Punkt als Dezimaltrenner.

Und: motorcar \t= agricultural stand vorher schon da - das klingt komisch, normalerweise stehen a...
22017-09-23 18:12:37 UTCAlibaer Danke für den Hinweis mit den 1.5 Metern.
Die zweite Bemerkung mit dem motorcar....verstehe ich nicht. Was müsste ich verwenden, wenn es ein geteerter Weg ist, auf dem kein Auto fahren kann/ darf, aber kein Straßenschild mit den von dir genannten Zahlen angebracht ist?
32017-09-23 18:29:20 UTCmueschel Hier kannst du dir das zusammenstellen:
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
"motorcar" ist in der Regel zu speziell, weil z.B. Lastwagen, Motorräder und Taxis nicht eingeschlossen sind. "motorisierter Verkehr" wäre "motor_vehicle".
42017-09-23 18:34:30 UTCAlibaer Ich werde mit das Morgen noch mal anschauen. Ich bin mir aber ziemlich sicher, dass kein Schild angebracht ist, aber ich habe noch nie ein Auto gesehen, dass da gefahren wäre, für größere Fahrzeuge wäre der Weg zu schmal. Gruß Albert
12017-09-23 18:00:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "emigrated = yes' on these buildings - this tag is not common, could you explain its meaning?
Btw, please do not add "building=yes" on nodes, only on the way representing the shape.

Jan
12017-09-23 17:51:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tags "phone:fr" and "fax:fr" on several nodes - these are not common. Is there any specific reason to mention a language code on the phone number? E.g. is there another number answered in English?
12017-09-23 11:24:30 UTCmueschel Hallo,
für welchen Zeitraum ist hier gesperrt? Bei ~Monaten ist es besser, mit "temporary" zu arbeiten, sonst kann es zu späteren Problemen mit Anwendungen kommen die ihre Daten nur selten aktualisieren, oder wenn vergessen wird die Sperrung wieder aufzuheben. Siehe https://wik...
12017-09-23 11:21:33 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM!

access \tprivate
highway \tservice
maxspeed \t20
name \tSpielstrasse

Welche Schilder stehen da genau an der Straße? Nach deinem Tagging müsste da ein 20 km/h Schild stehen. Ist das wirklich so?
Auch wenn dort ein Schild "Privatweg" steht, is...
12017-09-22 20:32:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of this tag?
Building:ele - this has not been used before and is not documented.
Building:wall_mat - this tag is also unknown and should be "building:material" - would you mind changing this to the common tag?

Cheers, Jan
12017-09-22 11:23:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
what do you mean with this key? "recycling:books_&_music"? Is it a public open bookshelf?
Jan
22017-09-22 14:11:50 UTCmanof25 Hi,
This recycling bin is for people to deposit books and CDs/DVDs. No these bins are not bookshelves.
32017-09-22 14:31:32 UTCmueschel Alright, according to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/recycling#similar
The common tags for this are recycling:books and recycling:cds.
12017-09-22 11:31:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the leaf_type and leef_type tags here?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522360942
Jan
12017-09-22 11:28:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
was heißt denn "phonezx"?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5088455542
22017-10-15 16:45:45 UTCDeus Figendi Das ist eine gute Frage, vielleicht habe ich mich da irgendwie vertippt oder mein Telefon. Wenn es mir nicht einfällt kann ich das auch löschen.
32017-10-16 12:15:57 UTCfreebeer Und warum name=Sitzbank ?
Das kennt man schon von amenity=bench ...
Oder heisst es dreimal offiziell Sitzbank?
12017-09-20 10:46:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag "static = true" is new and not used in other places. Could you explain its meaning?

Thanks, Jan
12017-09-20 10:42:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM! Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags, I found several mistakes here like
"buillding" -> "building" or
"Building" -> "building" and some spaces in the key.

I fixed some mistakes, could you have another look and see i...
12017-09-19 10:55:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added these new tags to some nodes - could you explain there meaning?
UMR Espace Dev
UMR Espace-Dev

Jan
22017-09-19 11:04:07 UTCchris_seas Hi
It's just a test that i forget to delete. Thank you for your question.
Christophe
12017-09-19 10:47:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added these keys on 350 objects:
is_in_municipality, is_in_state.
The correct spelling is
is_in:municipality and is_in:state. Could you change this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-09-18 19:31:26 UTCmueschel Hallo Christoph,
du hast hier einen ganzen Stadtteil als Zahnarzt markiert. Ich mache diese Änderung mal rückgängig, bitte trage die Daten nochmal ein, an einem eigenen Knoten.

Gruß, Jan
12017-09-17 17:26:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
das Tag, das du hier verwendest ist ungewöhnlich. Meinst du vielleicht
man_made=street_cabinet
street_cabinet=telecom

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstreet_cabinet

Gruß, Jan
22017-09-17 17:59:04 UTCsha256_ Vielen Dank für deinen Tipp! Ich habs angepasst.
12017-09-17 16:26:03 UTCmueschel Hallo,
einen Verbesserungsvorschlag habe ich: Kannst du die Häuser genauso rechteckig machen wie sie es in Wirklichkeit sind? In iD geht das einfach mit der Taste "S".
Gruß, Jan
12017-09-16 19:00:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the phone numbers here? Copy and paste didn't work correctly.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521147281

Jan
22017-10-02 16:25:44 UTCHarald Hartmann And `Ramacca=Margherito`, too. What is it for?
32017-10-04 05:45:24 UTCAury88 WOW..I don't know what happened here. I copy-pasted the tag from a node to a closed way with JOSM and this is the first time this results in a mess (not knowing this could happen I didn't check ) . thank you guys for reporting to my attention all this
12017-09-16 15:37:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you clarify all the access tags here? They don't make too much sense. E.g. nobody is allowed to walk there, unless having a bicycle with them. Horses are allowed if they have permission by the owner.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521382389

And I also don't understand the meaning o...
12017-09-16 11:40:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check these two nodes, they both have a strange tag like "1-39 = 1-20"

Jan

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5077709852
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5077778453
12017-09-15 10:57:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
in this changeset you added some address tags - could you make sure that the key, e.g. "addr:دائرة" is in English, and one of the keys mentioned in the Wiki? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr

Cheers, Jan
12017-09-15 10:39:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used a new tag on these roads, "Kilátó sor" - could you explain its meaning? Keys should always be in English and should be documented in the wiki, so that people can understand and use them properly.

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-19 12:00:53 UTCTérképszerkesztő Hello Jan,
Thanks your observation, but it wasn't me.
Nevertheless I modified it, so it's proper now.
Greetings,
Térképszerkesztő
12017-09-15 08:48:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
here is a way with only foreign tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521034908
22017-09-15 09:32:59 UTCAlan Bragg deleted tags, added new
12017-09-14 14:26:31 UTCaharvey Hi!

The way you edited has 3 lanes only the left most is psv only, the rightmost two are normal.

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/1kH6wZEDjyV1ixlAPXtXDA

I've changed the tags over to use lanes:psv=designated|yes|yes, per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes#Description but still no...
22017-09-14 19:56:49 UTCmueschel Ah ok, this I couldn't see when reading the tags.
The correct tagging is:
vehicle:lanes = no | |
psv:lanes = designated | |

'lanes:psv' can only be used to mark that there is a psv lane, but doesn't tell anything about where it is.
32017-09-15 01:25:57 UTCaharvey Sorry you're right, thanks for that!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes:psv is only for marking out how many psv lanes exist, not where they are.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes#Lanes_reserved_for_specific_vehicles describes marking out where those psv lanes are.

I'...
12017-09-14 12:46:54 UTCtrigpoint What does GPB mean?
22017-09-14 18:26:51 UTCfreebeer GRRRRREAT Pr*>pop<*thudKLONK*itish bounds...
Has anybody seen me teeth?
32017-09-14 19:51:44 UTCmueschel Sure... it was "currency:gbp", I wanted to fix it to capital letters... and mixed them up. Thanks for pointing out!
Jan
12017-09-14 10:10:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
if this is a helipad, could you add the the common tag
aeroway = helipad?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5074826767

Thanks, Jan
22017-09-17 03:11:20 UTCRichard L Removed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52107954
Thanks for notifying.
12017-09-14 10:05:21 UTCmueschel Hallo,
schau doch bitte hier mal nach dem Tag " build:c = gate" - das verstehe ich nicht.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247068218
Gruß, Jan
12017-09-13 20:42:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
willkommen bei OSM! Das sieht für mich alles richtig erfasst aus (ob das Gebäude da wirklich steht kann ich mangles Ortskenntnis natürlich nicht bestätigen).
Gruß, Jan
12017-09-08 20:01:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
willkommen bei OSM! Ist das hier ein richtiger Kreisel mit Insel oder nur ein markierter mini_roundabout ohne Insel?
Im ersten Fall muss ein junction=roundabout an den runden Weg. Bei einem Kreisel ohne Insel sollte die gezeichnete Geometrie bei der normalen Kreuzung bleiben, nur der Kreuzung...
22017-09-12 16:29:17 UTCVingHS Hallo,
Dankeschön. Das wusste ich nicht, aber ich schaue es mir nochmal an. Es handelt sich nämlich nur um einen aufgemalten Kreisverkehr.
32017-09-12 18:44:15 UTCmueschel 👍 So sieht es gut aus. Die Mühe mit "direction" brauchst du dir eigentlich nicht machen, die normale Richtung lässt sich ja aus dem Land ableiten.
12017-09-12 08:17:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are two ways with many foreign tags, looks like a mistake:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523877443
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29690100

Jan
22017-09-12 08:18:48 UTCmueschel Here as well: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374691498
maybe there are more.
32017-09-12 11:03:52 UTCAlan Bragg Thanks, tags have been deleted.
Alan
12017-09-11 20:14:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
zwei Anmerkungen zu deinen Edits habe ich:
Häuser haben in der Regel rechte Winkel, bitte zeichne sie auch entsprechend. In iD, das Gebäude markieren und "S" drücken.
Außerdem gibt es jetzt hier einige Adressen doppelt und dreifach. Wenn du die Adresse an ein Ge...
12017-09-11 11:23:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you are using some new tags to describe fire hydrants. There is already an established scheme for tagging used thousands of times, including these tags:
fire_hydrant:coupling_type
fire_hydrant:couplings
fire_hydrant:pillar
fire_hydrant:type
fire_hydrant:wrench

See here for more:
https:...
22017-09-11 16:25:15 UTCsimone_girardelli Use automatic translation.

Hello mueschel,
tags you quoted are those of today in this page [0] there are changes with new tags, they replace some tags for hydrants or similar.
The page should be in the approval phase and a short (there is certainty) become predefined tags for the mapping of hyd...
32017-09-11 18:31:52 UTCmueschel There is no voting on this proposal yet. Please wait until it has been accepted before changing the tagging of existing nodes on a larger scale.
42017-09-11 19:51:22 UTCsimone_girardelli You speak italian? :)

Grant me a month, Meanwhile I am Italian mailing list, if from them I recommend to stay with old tags, up to the final vote, give to replace the tags.

Maybe someone intervenes in the comments of the changeset, let me also this, at the bottom it is to understand what tags ...
52017-09-11 20:10:40 UTCmueschel I'm fine with a new tagging scheme, but we have to keep in mind that this might break existing tools, that don't understand these tags yet.
62017-09-13 07:08:15 UTCmiox Hi. I agree with mueschel. Before changing the tagging scheme it had better to update the tools that use this data like osmhydrant and openfiremap.
72017-09-13 17:13:50 UTCsimone_girardelli Ciao, ho rimesso i vecchi tag, per favore controllate se è a osto, ho lasciato wrench=pentagonal, erchè mi pare un dettaglio aggiuntivo che non influisce.

Ciao e grazie per le vostre eventuali.
82017-09-15 13:53:44 UTCmiox Per me Ok
12017-09-11 19:49:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added pharamcy opening hours here using the key "pharmacy_hours" - this has not been used in any other place yet. What exactly is the intended meaning and difference to opening_hours?
Cheers, Jan
12017-09-10 11:15:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
zwei Anmerkungen habe ich: Du scheinst von den Bing-Bildern abgemalt zu haben - diese haben hier aber eine schlechte Qualität und auch einen Versatz von mehreren Metern. Schalte besser auf "Esri World Imagery" um, diese Bilder sind wesentlich besser.

Die Häuser sollten au...
12017-09-10 11:11:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
we do have the sidewalk key. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
If there is a sidewalk on both sides and both have the same surface the tagging would be

sidewalk = both
sidewalk:surface = asphalt

Jan
12017-09-10 10:08:25 UTCmueschel Moin,
willkommen bei OSM. In diesem Edit ist aber leider etwas schief gegangen. Die Straße führt jetzt mitten durch ein Haus und zwei Zäune. Wurde da irgendetwas abgerissen?

Beim Anschließen an den Zeilsheimer Weg hast du auch noch einen Knoten des Zauns mit verschoben.
\...
22017-09-10 12:18:29 UTCTourenbikerFKB Diverse Indizien deuten darauf hin, dass das Gebäude und der Zaun Geschichte sind. Ich war aber selber nicht dort und Abmalen gilt ja nicht :-)
32017-09-10 12:31:36 UTCTourenbikerFKB Hintergrundinfo: http://www.kreisblatt.de/lokales/main-taunus-kreis/Gewerbegebiet-wird-jetzt-erweitert;art676,2472625
42017-09-22 20:50:52 UTCcor73 Hallo DÄD, hier ist wohl noch mehr schief gelaufen, auch die komplette Fläche nordwestlich des Zeilsheimer Wegs heißt jetzt Tierheim Kelkheim, hier wurde aus landuse=farmland buildung=yes. Das habe ich mal korrigiert.

Das Bei einem Besuch vor Ort musste ich zudem feststellen, dass...
12017-09-10 10:02:13 UTCmueschel Dieses Museum heißt doch sicher nicht "Museum"? Und dieser Tag macht auch wenig Sinn: "Tabakspeicher = tourism=museum"

Gruß, Jan
22017-09-10 15:06:51 UTCRailAir Hallo Jan,
danke für den Hinweis. Ist jetzt behoben.
Gruß, Bernd
12017-09-09 14:42:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several objects with many strange tags like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520646055

ILCE_ADI = FATÄ°H
ILCE_ID = 12
MAHALLE_AD = KATÄ°P KASIM
MAHALLE_ID = 247
admn_level = 5
cdk_id = admr.istb.fatih.katip.kasim
ilce_lcase = Fatih
l...
12017-09-09 13:46:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast dem Feldweg die Tags
surface=unpaved und tracktype=grade1
gegeben. Das passt nicht zusammen, schau da mal ins Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype

Die ganzen Zusatztags wie mtb:* sind richtig aber eigentlich nicht nötig, solange d...
22017-09-09 16:23:12 UTCradler21 Danke für den Hinweis. Hab´s schon geändert.
gruß Wolfgang
12017-09-09 09:47:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
mit dem Verschieben von Objekten per Satellitenbild muss man vorsichtig sein. Gerade die "neuen" Bing Bilder, die es seit ein paar Monaten gibt haben einen großen Versatz. Also am besten immer mit den anderen verfügbaren Quellen abgleichen. Da wären die Bilder von Esri...
22017-09-10 18:34:38 UTCShmias können wir es in dem fall einfach rückgängig machen?
12017-09-08 19:57:20 UTCmueschel 👍 Alles richtig eingetragen. Mit JOSM als Editor lassen sich solche Beschränkungen einfacher bearbeiten.
12017-09-08 19:50:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
anstelle den Knoten zu löschen, kannst du ihn auch stehen lassen. Für leerstehende Läden haben wir den Tag "shop = vacant". Wenn die Gefahr besteht, dass andere die Schließung nicht mitbekommen haben und den POI wieder hinzufügen könnten - setz noch eine...
12017-09-08 19:39:41 UTCmueschel Hi Alex,
meinst du, da steht ein Schild 'Einfahrt verboten' wie am Ende einer Einbahnstraße? D.h. man darf da durchaus rausfahren? Dann müsste man das etwas komplizierter Taggen mit einer Abbiegebeschränkung. Im Augenblick sperrt das "motor_vehicle=no" ja den Verkehr in be...
22017-09-11 08:25:27 UTCAlex Makarov Hi, actually the gate was half-closed when I was driving by - so I think it was completely closed for drive-through. Maybe it's temporarily though.
12017-09-08 10:56:45 UTCmueschel Hallo,
wie sind diese Zugangsbeschränkungen zu verstehen? Sa/So ist das ganze Jahr über zu? Dann sollte das Tag sein:
access:conditional =\tno @ (oct-may);\tno @ (Sa-Su)

Und gilt das auch für Fußgänger? Sonst müsste da statt access vehicle oder sogar motor_vehicle...
22017-09-13 13:47:26 UTCanonym33 Ja, jetzt müsste es stimmen, das Fahrverbot Samstags und Sonntags gilt nur auf der Glarner Seite zwischen Richisau und der Kantonsgrenze, und es gilt nur für Motorfahrzeuge (was auch jetzt vermerkt ist).

Die Wintersperre Oktober-Mai gilt für alle, denn da wird halt die Straße...
12017-09-05 18:42:24 UTCmueschel http://openstreetmap.org/node/5060471909
has "lentil = 0". Did you mean 'level = 0'?

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-05 18:58:29 UTCyourealwaysbe What can i say, not everyone sells lentils :(

Fixed, thanks!
12017-09-04 19:26:07 UTCmueschel Welchen Zweck haben denn diese "Hilfspunkte"?
Gruß, Jan
22017-09-04 23:55:20 UTCberjk Ich habe einen Bekannten, der hat auf einer alten Karte von Hand die alte Grenze zwischen Kirchdorf eingezeichnet.
Durch abpausen und übertragen sind dann die Hilfspunkte entstanden, in der Hoffnung, dass man dort alte Straßen im Ort und alte Feldweg außerorts dann finden kann.
Da...
32017-09-04 23:56:04 UTCberjk Anm: da war ja einer mal richtig schnell!
12017-09-04 11:26:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some waste baskets here - amenity=waste_basket is the correct tag for them, but what is the meaning of all the other tags like these:
Name =\tMovable
description =\t19.134763, 72.906701
extrude = \t0
tessellate = \t-1
visibility =\t-1
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5077612639...
12017-09-04 11:24:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some copy shops to OSM - could you check them for correct tagging?
Please have a look to the wiki about tagging of these: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcopyshop

If you want to add further information like "A4, A3 (Coloured)", you can put this to a 'desc...
22017-09-11 10:37:50 UTCrasagy Hey Vineet,

Want to add on to Jan’s comment: Details about the print shops need to be added using relevant service tags for shop=copyshop, such as service:copy=yes (for photocopy service), service:print=yes (small set of prints) etc.
Details: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dc...
32017-09-14 05:31:12 UTCvineetkamboj Hi Rasagy,
I tried to update the tag (shop=copyshop) but still it is not rendering the correct icon.
12017-09-04 11:21:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some addresses with tags like these
addr:بلدية=تعظميت
addr:قرية=قرية النثيلة
addr:ولاية=الجلفة

Could you make sure the key only contains english keys as described in the wiki?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbe...
12017-09-04 11:19:41 UTCmueschel Are there really 56 police stations in this small area? It could be a "
amenity=security_booth", a tag that is used 74 times already.

Other question: Guard_type=Guard 30: H15 C wing - shouldn't this be a name = ...

And these tags I don't understand, could you explain them?
...
22017-09-04 20:14:59 UTCudayanvidyanta These are the position of the security guards. I couldn't find an appropriate icon/tag for them, so had to use the one for police.
32017-09-11 11:02:17 UTCrasagy Are these guards at an entrance (better to use barrier=entrance) or at a gate (better to use one of the gates in barrier tag (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier). Along with that, you can use barrier:personnel=yes (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier:personnel)

Also, not a...
12017-09-03 20:38:38 UTCmueschel Was soll dieser Node denn darstellen? Das Tagging nutzt leider keine üblichen Tags, so dass man auch nichts auf ener Karte davon sehen wird.
Gruß, Jan
12017-09-03 12:52:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you have a look to this tags?
Technique = 3x (2,38x4,85)
building = bengalow
Could you explain the "Technique" tag? And I guess you meant 'bungalow'.

Cheers, Jan
12017-09-03 12:39:17 UTCmueschel Hallo,
OSM enthält in der Regel keine historischen Daten, wenn Straßen umgebaut wurden, sollten die alten Linien entfernt werden und nicht mit einem (neu erfundenen) Tag "historic:mapping:*" in der Datenbank bleiben. Es handelt sich hier ja auch nur um einen einfachen Umbau ein...
12017-09-03 12:34:51 UTCmueschel Hallo Daniel,
warum hast du hier im Ort alle Bushaltestellen entweder mit name=Stadtbus Kulmbach oder name=OVF Omnibus Verkehr Franken versehen? Das name-Tag dient dazu, den genauen Namen der Haltestelle zu erfassen, nicht für eine Beschreibung, wessen Busse dort halten.
Gruß, Jan
12017-09-03 10:06:57 UTCmueschel Bitte nicht die Position von Objekten nach Bing korrigieren! Bing-Bilder liegen 5-10 Meter falsch!
12017-06-06 11:15:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
is "Koma-koma" the name of this river?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331458995

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-03 08:29:20 UTCLineo Hi Jan,

Yes Koma-koma is the name of the river
32017-09-03 09:28:21 UTCmueschel Thank you for correcting the tags!
12017-09-01 19:29:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you invented a new tag here - "building:eaves:levels" what is its meaning?
Is building:levels and roof:levels not sufficient?

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-02 05:14:27 UTCKingigi Hi Jan,

Thank you for your message.
I tried to add the height and shape of some roofs, using some information I found on the OSM-Wiki.

Triggered by your message I did some more research and found a better way to add this information to OSM usingroof:levels, building:levels, and roof:shape

...
12017-09-01 09:27:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw the tags "line1" and "line2" on several of bus stops in this area. These tags are not used in other places. The key "route_ref" is used quite often for the purpose of noting the bus services stopping at a node. You can add several numbers / names in a list, s...
12017-09-01 09:23:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
In these edits you used two tags which are not common: "rain cover" and "sitting cap".
All our software (maps and other tools) can interpret this information only if common tags are used as they are described in the wiki. I think that "rain cover"...
12017-08-31 20:53:25 UTCmueschel Woher hast du diese ganzen access-Tags? An dem ganzen Weg gibt es kein einziges Schild, der Weg ist frei für jedweden Verkehr.
12017-08-31 10:53:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "Rue de la Vallée = Rue de Grande Maison" to 5 ways, could you check this name tag?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89129678
Cheers, Jan
12017-08-29 08:59:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
87 of these railways have a strange tag
"object_type,level=3". Could you check this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-08-29 21:11:13 UTCMelioraCogito I'll remove these tags as they didn't have the effect I was looking for – I was trying to set a map rendering level (1 being the lowest level) for each object as some of the greyed crossovers lines are sitting on top of the darker mainline objects (I tend to get a bit OCD over this kind of iss...
32017-08-29 21:30:23 UTCMelioraCogito P.S. – changes made.

Cheers.
42017-08-30 18:59:27 UTCmueschel Looks like the rendering order is not yet perfect for rails. Everything related to "how it looks like" is usually a matter of the renderer and 'solving' the error by changing the tagging should usually not be done.
The default OSM style can be found here:
https://github.com/gravitystorm...
12017-08-29 11:24:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several relations with only foreign tags - could you change those to common OSM tags?

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-28 13:54:30 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was möchtest du mit "wheelchair:description = geschlossen!" ausdrücken? Wenn das Restaurant nicht mehr existiert, sollte das auch so eingetragen werden.
Gruß, Jan
22017-08-28 19:54:54 UTCHAZET Hallo Jan,
das ist relativ einfach zu erklären. Ich habe die Markierung über Wheelmap gemacht - dort kann man nicht löschen. Und da mir die Warnung an Rollstuhlfahrer wichtiger war als korrektes Vorgehen, habe ich es erst mal so gemacht. Für Rollifahrer ist nichts blöder, a...
32017-08-28 19:57:55 UTCHAZET Ist offensichtlich schon gelöscht, dann ist doch alles gut.
42017-08-28 19:57:58 UTCmueschel Ich glaube nicht, dass dort zu ist - es gibt ein aktuelles Wochenmenü.
52017-08-28 19:58:51 UTCHAZET Dann hat es vielleicht einen anderen Inhaber? Anderes Lokal eingezogen?
62017-08-28 20:03:51 UTCHAZET Irgendwas stimmt doch mit diesem Knoten nicht. Wieso bekomme ich die Adresse nicht mehr?
Der Schanzenstern ist umgezogen nach Altona, Bartelsstraße ist passé.
12017-08-28 14:02:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
ist zwar schon ewig her, aber der Grenzverlauf hier kommt mir komisch vor. Hast du da irgendwo eine nutzbare Quelle?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/324148365

Gruß, Jan
22017-08-28 19:08:23 UTCMichaH Das sieht mir so aus als ob ich hier damals diesen einen Knoten der Grenze versehendlich verschoben habe.
12017-08-28 13:57:20 UTCmueschel Hallo,
welche Bedeutung hat das Tag "wiki_link = hamburg.freifunk.net"? Wenn es hier WLAN gibt, dann bitte mit "internet_access..." eintragen.
Jan
12017-08-28 11:41:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the name of this street, I guess it is wrong.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42726531

Carrera 45A = Ciudadela Guadalupe
name = Calle 5A
12017-08-28 11:20:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you have a look to these edits? There are 89 ways with the key 'cyclway' instead of 'cycleway'.

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-27 16:44:45 UTCmueschel Woher hast du denn diese merkwürdige Linienführung der 64 am Bahnhof? Durch die Seestraße fährt er sicher nicht, sonst käme er auch nicht am Bussteig A vorbei.
22017-08-28 11:59:10 UTCTetiSoft Danke für den Hinweis, jetzt hält er erst an A dann an B und nutzt nicht die Seestraße.
12017-08-27 11:13:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/412055749

phar = pha looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-27 11:12:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7484856
Is this a restrictions for cars higher than the given value? Then it should be
... @ height > 13'6"
We're referring to the actual size of the vehicle, not a restriction like 'maxheight'.

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-27 16:19:49 UTCdannykath Hi, mueschel! Thank you for you attentiveness. Of course, in this case it is forbidden to drive cars higher than 13'6'', not equal to 13'6''.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7484856
I fixed TR according to you comment. Best regards Danny
12017-08-27 09:24:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw that you added destination tags to roads. In some cases you mixed up the order of key, subkey and suffix, e.g.

destination:lanes:colour -> destination:colour:lanes
destination:backward:ref -> destination:ref:backward
I think I fixed most of them, maybe you can check this as wel...
22017-08-28 16:59:44 UTCd3mol3k thx Jan
Robert
12017-08-26 18:12:18 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM!
Bitte schau mal hier im Wiki nach, wie Ladestationen üblicherweise getagged werden - das muss konsistent sein, damit Anwendungen mit den Informationen etwas anfangen können.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Wenn du Frage...
12017-08-25 11:48:16 UTCAsgerFrank Korte spærringsændringer kan være problematiske, men husk i det mindste om muligt selv at rette tilbage, det er ikke sikkert andre gør.
22017-08-25 11:56:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
I didn't add this oneway tag, I just corrected it to a scheme that is already in use, see the history: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516178075/history

The good thing about the temporary:* scheme is that nobody has to remember to remove it - the end date is given in the value, so there are...
32017-08-25 12:04:02 UTCAsgerFrank Great, apparently my comment is completely unnecessary; I must educate myself http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional)
12017-08-25 10:59:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
why did you delete so many existing buildings and redraw them? In general, this is considered bad practice because it delete the history of an object.

I also doubt that all these buildings actually have this shape - most buildings are rectangular.

Third, you added the tag "building=...
12017-08-25 10:49:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw that you added destination tags to roads. In some cases you mixed up the order of key, subkey and suffix, e.g.

lanes:destination -> destination:lanes
destination:lanes:colour -> destination:colour:lanes

I think I fixed most of them, maybe you can check this as well.
In gene...
12017-08-22 18:36:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515538457
All of the tags despite highway=path are no tags that are common in OSM.

Jan
12017-08-22 18:28:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
what do you mean by "casher = no"? This tag is not used in any other place.

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-22 18:25:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong with this import. more than 1700 nodes have only strange tags like these:
CODLOC=25048
addr_city=Gressan
addr_house=2
addr_post=11020
addr_stre=Les Fleurs

I can't find this import in the Wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue\...
22017-08-23 06:22:12 UTCCUSPC Hi, I can not find them anymore. There are only the correct ones. The didier2020 correction is correct. Thank you
12017-08-19 18:30:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "maxwheight" to two ways. I can't decide whether this should be 'maxweight' or 'maxheight'.
http://osm.org/way/445731771
http://osm.org/way/49901956

Jan
12017-08-19 14:17:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, it has only foreign tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5026647150

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-19 17:06:58 UTCAndersAndersson I forgot to remove the tags added by the GPS. It is now fixed.
12017-08-19 14:15:00 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ich kann im "Gästebrief" den du als Quelle angibst, keinen Hinweis zu einer Lizenz erkennen, der es erlaubt die Daten in OSM zu übernehmen. Hast du da eine schriftliche Erlaubnis?
Gruß, Jan
12017-08-06 13:09:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these nodes? Most have tags which look like they don't belong to OSM, like these:
Lat=32.231613
Lon=-110.971756
STINTERSEC=STONE AV / UNIVERSITY BL

Jan
22017-08-06 13:11:03 UTCmueschel Addendum:
It looks like none of these points is actually part of a road - that is required to be able to use this information e.g. in routing engines.
32017-08-08 21:45:43 UTCDylansc These are all tagged according to People For Bikes OpenStreetMap Tagging Guidelines for HAWKs (signaled crosswalks)... I followed the guidelines listed here

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HuAXQUnCEcv9aLZyIDHkLTJ5ZSKfB-U4MlJSmN-1BLk/edit#heading=h.tle1tl5ruh6c

These points aren't part of t...
42017-08-08 23:08:41 UTCmueschel This document is a good reference. But there is no reference to the keys Lat, Lon, STINTERSEC I mentioned above, which should not be there.

Ways consist of points, and the crossing tags need to be on a point that belongs to a way. It's as simple as that.


52017-08-15 22:10:50 UTCDylansc Would the best method for me to fix this be for each 131 nodes:
1. go into "edit with iD" edit mode
2. Delete the 3 unnecessary tags (Lat, Lon, and STINTERSEC)
3. snap it to appropriate intersection/roadway

Additionally, I feel I should add some sort of tag that says specifically a H...
62017-08-16 08:11:45 UTCmueschel Yes, this is a possible way.
a) if you use iD, check all tags again after snapping the node to the intersection - some of them are already tagged and this might cause iD to add wrong tags.

b) Are these traffic lights for pedestrians only or do they control the intersection as well?
http://www....
72017-08-17 18:54:49 UTCDylansc a) noted

b) I think you are incorrect for "if they control the whole intersection, use highway=traffic_lights, there is no further tagging needed" (first off I think you meant to say highway=traffic_signals).

according to:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_si...
82017-08-17 18:59:37 UTCmueschel Yes, you are right. I was a too concise here.
I only described the highway=* tag, not the crossing=*, which is equal in both cases.

"There is no further tagging needed..." was meant to be a new paragraph addressing your question on how to make clear it is HAWK.
92017-08-17 19:07:54 UTCDylansc Great! I'll proceed in correcting the errors one by one.

Thanks
12017-08-17 10:55:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added tags like this one to more than 200 objects. Could you have a look and remove them?
extensions \t<extensions xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ogr="http://osgeo.org/gdal" xmlns="http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1">
<o...
12017-08-17 10:45:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some ways with only strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514499767
Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-17 10:40:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like this and another changeset added 51 objects with strange tags like these:

ADDRTYPE=SUBORD
FULLADDR=20 MALACHIGAN, CROISSANT DU
PI_MUNICIP=__AK2WLJ
POINT_X=383815.2027
POINT_Y=5034062.8701
22017-08-17 11:30:45 UTCLogicalViolinist Sorry about that, ill remove them
32017-08-17 12:18:55 UTCLogicalViolinist Corrected in: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51203524
12017-08-16 10:56:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key 'estd:' to various objects. This key is not yet used in any other place. I guess you should use "start_date" instead, which is used everywhere else.

Also, please use the Gregorian Calendar for dates - otherwise data can not be easily understood by any OSM tool.
\...
12017-08-16 10:55:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key 'estd:' to various objects. This key is not yet used in any other place. I guess you should use "start_date" instead, which is used everywhere else.

Also, please use the Gregorian Calendar for dates - otherwise data can not be easily understood by any OSM tool.
\...
12017-08-16 10:33:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added a new key here, and used several different spellings:

FR:grande_circulation
fr:grande_circulation
fr:grande_circulation_1

OSM Tags are case sensitive, could you change them to a common spelling? Additionally, we usually don't put a language code in front of a tag. It should be...
22017-08-16 12:23:31 UTCbibi6 Hi,
Thanks for pointing me this out. I actually wanted to use the FR:grande_circulation tag, but I probably did a wrong manip for the others (unless iD doesn't care about case :/ )
Anyway, taking your second remark into account, I'm going to use grande_circulation instead. (Changeset 51169807 is ...
12017-08-15 20:37:54 UTCmueschel Fixed several 'maxpeed' tags - could you check if I got them all?
12017-08-15 20:37:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "maxpeed:tilting" on a bunch of tracks. Could you edit them and add the missing 's'?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-15 21:58:10 UTCflierfy Hello Jan,
I thank you for the hint. I've added the missing letter.
With thankful regards, Stephan
12017-08-14 11:35:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of 'eruv' on this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513968801

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-14 14:56:41 UTCElliottPlack Jan,

Sure, an eruv is a physical object that serves as a symbolic boundary in the Jewish Orthodox faith. Read more:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv

There isn't a great tag for this yet on OSM, so I added this under the premise of the "Any tags you like" principle (http://wiki.opens...
32017-08-14 15:13:16 UTCmueschel Alright, I haven't seen this before.
I see one potential problem with the tagging: A barrier=* implies an access restriction, by default access=no. So, if anybody by mistake adds a common node with any highway, routing engines might think traffic is blocked.
I don't think we have a proper tagging...
42017-08-15 02:48:02 UTCElliottPlack Jan: I'm glad that you found this and commented. I think your idea is superb. I was trying to decide if I should use an existing key like barrier but you make a good point that it could be interpreted by a routing engine as a generic barrier. Better to start something totally fresh.

What do you t...
52017-08-15 18:42:39 UTCmueschel ':' versus '_' - there is no functional difference between the two. Usually, ':' is used for subkeys, e.g. a key that further describes the main key, e.g. 'capacity' and the more specific 'capacity:disabled'. The underscore is more used like a replacement for a space as in "internet_access"...
12017-08-14 09:22:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "Wifi_Etecsa = Wifi_Etecsa" on several nodes - this is not a common tag, could you explain its meaning? If it is the operator of the Wifi, consider the key internet_access:operator

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-14 09:19:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check the Russian tags on this object? All objects have to use the tags described in the wiki, otherwise this information can not be understood by any software.

деятельность = отдых
деятельность_1 = пансионат
озеро = исс...
12017-08-14 08:54:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
what do you mean using the prefix "will:" on these buildings? The usual prefixes include planned:, proposed: and "construction", see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-14 09:43:42 UTCfreeExec Thanks for the help, I will change for the planned.
12017-08-13 18:07:29 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier Öffnungszeiten eingetragen - könntest du sie noch ändern, so dass sie nach dem gängigen Schema getagged sind? So lassen sie sich dann auch automatisch auswerten und in diversen Tools anzeigen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening hours

Wenn ...
12017-08-10 19:10:20 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier mehrfach 'raised:building' geschrieben - meinst du 'razed'?
Jan
22017-08-11 15:57:24 UTCgeozeisig Du hast recht ich finde es aber spontan nicht wieder.
32017-08-11 16:25:38 UTCmueschel Kein Problem:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qWB
12017-08-11 10:59:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. All objects in OSM need to have a tag that describes what they are. Just putting a human readable description on a node won't do the job. The wiki shows how these tags should look like, e.g. here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dbasin

Jan
12017-08-09 07:00:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key 'namleg_en' on several boundaries. This key is new and not used in other places. Maybe the usual tags 'official_name', 'official_name:en' or 'full_name' fit?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-09 14:33:11 UTCUndearius My apologies. I had originally intended to remove these tags but they made it easier for filtering. The value of these tags is their full, proper legal name so they may be useful.
The 'namleg_en' tag is the same as the 'name' tag with the addition of "Township of" or "County of"...
32017-08-10 17:15:54 UTCmueschel 'official_name:en' is used almost 2000 times, and follows the guidelines shown on the Wiki page on name tags.
Thanks for taking care!
42017-08-14 19:53:47 UTCUndearius I've changed the tags to the correct ones. Thank you for the help.
12017-08-06 13:07:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "Varsure" on some of these nodes. Could you explain its meaning?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-09 09:37:29 UTCddm-dolomitico Hi Jan,

the "Varsure" tag is a editing error (in fact "Varsure" is the name of a location); I corrected the wrong tags with "name: lld" or "loc_name".

Thank you very much for your error reporting. In the future, I will pay more attention to OSM's editing...
32017-08-09 09:51:43 UTCddm-dolomitico Hi Jan,

I was wrong, now all "Varsure" tags are correct (I found out the use of "taginfo" so I saw the list of all the wrong tags)

Cheers, Danilo
42017-08-09 12:04:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
thanks for taking the time and fixing this. You can also use http://overpass-turbo.eu/to search for a key (click on 'wizard' and enter "Varsure=* global" then click run)
12017-08-09 07:17:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
bist du sicher, dass die Fahrt hier wirklich 20 Minuten dauert? Oder meinst du, dass die Fähre alle 20 Minuten fährt?

Jan
12017-08-06 20:11:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many very strange tags here and on other restaurants. Please have a look to the Wiki to see how objects are tagged in OSM.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513151990
DiningRoomHours
DriveThruHours
EnglishApplicationUrl
HasDiningRoom
HasDriveThru
ImageUrl
Latitude
Longitude
O...
22017-08-06 20:21:05 UTCmneko I'm trying to follow the instructions on http://maproulette.org/ui/metrics/433
i might have misunderstood it
32017-08-06 21:50:48 UTCmueschel I don't think they meant to copy all the data from there. You can have a look how other restaurants of this chain are mapped:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qQe
42017-08-07 14:09:40 UTCmneko OK, I think I corrected the ones I broke
52017-08-08 18:29:35 UTCmueschel This looks good. *thumbs up
12017-08-08 10:28:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 32 buildings have the tag "B30 2DH=B30" which looks like a mistake. Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-08 14:17:43 UTCbrianboru Thanks Jan - what happened here I don't know! Corrected now
12017-08-08 10:27:16 UTCmueschel These changes contain 33x "maxpeed" instead of "maxspeed".
Jan
12017-08-07 11:11:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tag on this road (and other segments of it)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59990980
"L3036 = Reddy's Crossroads" looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-07 11:06:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 53 objects with the tag "stig=stig" which looks like a mistake, could you check that?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qQM

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-07 21:12:30 UTCfatuus Stig taggas med highway=path
12017-08-06 12:32:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check 23 of these lines? they have some strange tags like these which seem to be added by mistake:

CITYOBJECT_ID=186033
GMLID=BID_ba033755-60eb-4cfa-a17f-787c9a794cad
ROOF_TYPE=1000

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-06 13:48:28 UTCMarkus Valo Thanks for noticing! Tried to clean all of them. All of those tags are unnecessary.
32017-08-06 14:28:35 UTCmueschel Thanks for your effort. Here are the remaining ones:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qPZ
42017-08-06 14:49:54 UTCMarkus Valo All clean now, thanks for the tool link!
12017-08-06 13:17:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "caricato=false" on 41 ways. This tag is not used in any other place - could you explain its meaning?

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-06 12:59:17 UTCmueschel Is there any chance that this import gets cleaned up? (Just commenting this one changeset, not all of them)

There are hundreds of POIs without proper tags, with a lot of text in undocumented tags like "note50", "opening_hours" which don't use the documented syntax and so on.
...
22017-09-22 21:27:15 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52290172 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed import 50238127 which introduced lots of odd tags. Attempts to discuss with mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1458 et al. Since-edited objects lef...
12017-07-10 07:44:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these imported nodes?
- 'is_in' can not be used to tag addresses. Use addr:street and addr:housenumber instead
- 'Ref:FR:SIREN' should be 'ref:FR:SIREN'
- description1 and description2 are no recognized tags
- most nodes are missing a physical tag, describing ...
22017-08-06 12:55:26 UTCmueschel Is there any chance that this import gets cleaned up?
Various people are doing some corrections on this data, but in the end most of the information remains useless.

Jan
32017-08-19 08:39:31 UTCzerpou Hi,

I'm a french student in engineering of 20 years and in a part of my leisure time I do some changes on OSM.

This morning I have deleted a part of "is_in" and description1/2. In addition I modify the tag "Ref...".

Best regards,

Albin

42017-09-22 21:27:07 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52290172 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed import 50238127 which introduced lots of odd tags. Attempts to discuss with mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1458 et al. Since-edited objects lef...
12017-07-06 08:29:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
this import of fountains doesn't seem to fit to the OSM license.
You put these tags on all nodes:
Fonte = Metropolitana Milanese - MM
Licenza = CC-BY
cc-by is not compatible with ODbL, see
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

And, please don't invent new keys li...
22017-07-06 08:52:17 UTCNemo_bis Sorry for the Italian keys, I was confused by the localisation. Will fix these in a moment.

The blog post you link is about the generic CC-BY licenses, but this dataset is under CC-BY-IT which has a special provision waiving all rights for databases, hence Creative Commons Italia believes such da...
32017-07-06 08:59:04 UTCmueschel Could you mention this specifically in the changeset comment / source tag? Just so that nobody else gets confused or thinks cc-by is sufficient.
42017-07-11 10:11:44 UTCAndreas Lattmann Ciao Nemo_bis, hai fatto la pagina nel Wiki per l' import? Non la riesco a trovare. Grazie
52017-08-05 18:20:31 UTCmueschel Are you still going to fix this and provide a documentation of the import?
62017-10-06 19:28:53 UTCAlecs01 See also the previous changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50065252
12017-07-26 12:25:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong here - these nodes all have tags like "ref=290 = RU-KDA-6" - the key of this tag is 'ref=290' which can't be right. Could you have a look and fix this? It's about 150 different keys.
22017-08-05 18:07:28 UTCmueschel I changed these tags now. Please check if my edit is correct.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50868182
12017-08-05 17:46:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many objects with very strange tags here - for example

highway=64/24
natural=Chu Thị Thuong Ha
shop=TDok

What is the meaning of all this? Pleae have a look to the OSM wiki to learn about how objects have to be tagged to be usable by OSM users.

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-01 19:18:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are many nodes which have just strange tags like these:
CODLOC=12
GEOCODICE=12/5
GRAFICO=5
LINK=12-5
NCIV=5

Was this a mistake?
Jan
22017-08-02 07:55:12 UTCCUSPC I have joined a full level rather than just the selection.
Now I've corrected all tags.
thank you
32017-08-05 17:33:46 UTCmueschel They are still there: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qPu
12017-08-04 16:50:24 UTCGinaroZ I think mot is correct, as it offers an MOT service?
22017-08-04 17:40:28 UTCmueschel Shouldn't it be amenity=vehicle_inspection or service:vehicle:inspection=yes then? The first is documented and used 800 times, the latter is used 30 times.
32017-08-05 13:14:28 UTCSomeoneElse Something involving MOT would make perfect sense to me - see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=mot#keys and http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=mot#values for where it's been used before. "inspection" is hardly used for MOTs; see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/sea...
42017-08-05 13:49:16 UTCmueschel I'm not from the UK, so I didn't hear the term MOT before.
But as far as I see, these tags involving the term MOT are used maybe 50 times in the UK, while all the rest of Europe has the tag amenity=vehicle_inspection used 1300 times. This tag is supported in JOSM and shown e.g. in Osmand as well.
...
12017-08-04 15:23:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way, it has foreign tags only:
http://osm.org/way/511262268

12017-08-03 16:17:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
most of these nodes have only foreign tags which don't look like they should appear in the OSM database, can you check this?

Btw, what is the precise license of this data? Pure cc-by is not compatible with ODbL!
22017-08-03 16:29:25 UTCStefano baldissera Licenza d'uso CC-BY 2.5 fonte dati SITAD REGIONE PIEMONTE . http://www.sistemapiemonte.it/serviziositad/index.shtml

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/it/
32017-08-04 21:44:42 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50850714.
12017-08-02 19:05:38 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM. Was genau möchtest du hier mappen? Damit Software etwas mit den Informationen anfangen kann, müssen die Tags genau so wie im Wiki beschrieben benutzt werden. Wirf doch mal einen Blick auf Parkplätze und E-Tankstellen.
Bei Fragen hilft man dir im Forum ger...
22017-08-03 15:32:13 UTCNakaner Hallo Jan,

der Rest der Beiträge dieses Benutzers scheint auch größtenteils nicht von ernsthafter Natur zu sein. Ich habe es mir im Detail aber nicht angesehen und habe nicht die Zeit, mich darum zu kümmern.

Viele Grüße

Michael
12017-08-01 19:21:48 UTCmueschel Kannst du die ganzen 'capacity' tags an diesem und anderen Nodes überprüfen? Für die Leistung gibt es 'power' als Tag.

Gruß, Jan
22017-08-02 14:23:38 UTCbusch19 Danke für den Hinweis (bin neu). Habe es geändert.

Steffen
32017-08-02 18:22:47 UTCmueschel Das hatte ich gar nicht gesehen... Dann nachträglich noch: herzlich willkommen bei OSM! Zögere nicht dich zum Beispiel im Forum zu melden wenn du Fragen hast.
12017-08-01 19:45:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
could uou check the roads you added here?
15 of them have only strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511074247
12017-08-01 19:42:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the nodes you added, some have tags like
ADDRESS=1810 J 6/10 Rd, Fruita, 81521
PUB_PRI2=Public
STREET_TYP=Rd

This looks like a mistake.
12017-08-01 19:34:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
please be a bit careful when uploading changes - I found two relations where you changed an exisying key to 'ы'
22017-08-02 07:39:46 UTCmisht Ok, I'm sorry. Accidentally.
12017-08-01 19:16:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
63 ways got the tag 'wip_remove_me' - was this a mistake?
Cheers, Jan
22017-08-01 21:11:49 UTCM!dgard Uh yes, I added that to be able to conveniently select the ways I had to change, and I forgot to remove them. Fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/50764793. Thanks for the heads-up!
12017-07-31 15:45:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain all the name tags of this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4858193412
I doubt it has this name with '3.5 t'
22017-08-01 07:13:29 UTCJay May Hi :)
Sure! This is for people using OSM-based GPS apps (ex.: maps.me) to know which lane is for regular cars (≤3.5t meaning “for vehicles with a weight up to 3,5 tons), and which one is for trucks (TIR, abbreviation of Transport International Routier, is understood by every truck driver u...
32017-08-01 14:30:29 UTCmueschel We do have a clear policy that the name tag contains just the actual name and does not contain any description. For this you can use tags like maxweight or hgv. If tools like maps.me do not support this, request them to adapt to common OSM tagging rules.
42017-08-01 17:40:00 UTCJay May One question: what will it change for OSM if those border control tagged names are not visible to regular OSM users anyway?
52017-08-01 18:15:40 UTCmueschel Who is a "regular osm user"? There are hundreds of different maps and tools around. All of them render different things. And for example searching for names gets increasingly difficult if we add arbitrary information to the name tag.
62017-08-01 18:52:38 UTCJay May I'm afraid this is not arbitrary info. It is useful info, otherwise I wouldn't waste my time to look for it and reflect it on OSM. Rules are there as an indication, and may sometimes be wrong Some of them must be changed.
You state the policy on names it clear. I'm afraid it isn't. There are a cou...
12017-07-30 16:05:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 12 objects in your uploads with many foreign keys and no common OSM tags. Could you have a look and fix these?
Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510975694

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-30 16:03:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
most of the information you added does not use common tags. Spelling and Upper/Lower case matters a lot for software to be able to interpret these tags, e.g.
name instead of NAME
name:ar instead of Name_ar
place instead of Place
and so on. Could you please fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-30 15:45:15 UTCmueschel Please be careful what you upload to OSM. It's the second time I'm deleting tags like these:
Simon = Weak
Michael = Strong
Peter = Above Average
(I removed the user names you had there)
12017-07-30 15:37:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
some of the nodes have many foreign tags, could you check that? E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5002215004

Ja
22017-08-01 18:46:51 UTCAlan Bragg Thanks for catching that error and notifying me. I found that I had another similar error which I have corrected.
12017-07-16 13:11:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "access:coach =discouraged" in this changeset. This tag has not been used in other places yet.
I guess the common tag "tourist_bus = discouraged" is what you want to use here?

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-29 11:13:46 UTCgurglypipe Not really. The tagging is meant to reflect a road sign which says “Not suitable for coaches”. The tagging documentation I was following is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddiscouraged.
32017-07-29 12:40:46 UTCmueschel 'access:' is never a part of those keys. And osm knows two types of busses: bus and tourist_bus. Both are described on the wiki page you linked to. The 'discouraged' part is perfectly fine.
42017-07-29 13:04:36 UTCgurglypipe I was following the example of `access:bicycle=yes` (from that page). I guess the intention of the road sign could be encoded as `bus=discouraged`, `tourist_bus=discouraged`? The sign is probably more targeting the length and wheel base of the vehicles rather than their use as PSVs or multi-person v...
52017-07-29 14:07:38 UTCmueschel I don't know why this is listed there. The correct tag is 'bicycle' and is used 10000 times more often (300 vs 3 million uses)
62017-07-29 16:23:55 UTCgurglypipe OK, changed to bus=discouraged tourist_bus=discouraged in changeset #50675680. I’m not sure if I got all the instances of it, since I can’t get overpass to list any access:coach instances. (I’m obviously using it wrongly.)
72017-07-29 16:41:19 UTCmueschel Goto overpass-turbo.eu, Open the wizard and type 'access:coach=* global', click run. There is nothing left.
82017-07-30 08:07:26 UTCgurglypipe Great, thanks
12017-07-27 10:37:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tracktype tag of this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509577193

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-27 11:25:12 UTCwajak corrected. Thanks
12017-07-27 10:32:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
it's preferred to use the key 'alt_name' instead of 'name_1' - alt_name can be searched for (e.g. in the search box on osm.org) while most tools do not support name_1.

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-27 06:16:29 UTCcalfarome Hello Kyaw Htet Aung,
Thank you for your map edits, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
What is the source of this data that you are adding?, it seems that each of the points you added has its duplicates to the side and that is inconsistent for OpenStreetMap.
Could you please explain what happening i...
22017-07-27 08:32:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
it also looks like there are many tags copied from the source without changing them to common OSM standards. E.g. these tags should not appear in OSM

Shape_Area=0.00606869668746
Shape_Leng=0.57835062104
lat=16.850959
lng=96.162165

And, for example name tags in different languages have ...
32017-07-29 21:30:33 UTCrene78 Time to revert?
12017-07-26 15:59:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong here.
There are 160 nodes on the same spot, all with a lot of foreign tags which don't look like they belong to OSM:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4990832927

Jan
22017-07-26 16:02:00 UTCmueschel PS: I doubt that these lights are 4.5 km high. 'height' uses meter as units, not millimeters.
32017-07-28 13:58:06 UTCdidier2020 i fix height in this changeset 50650261
42017-08-08 14:20:20 UTCArjanO I guess something went wrong with an import.
Point taken.

best regards,
Arjano
12017-07-26 12:38:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
das tag 'vtm = yes' - soll das 'atm' heißen?
Gruß, Jan
22017-07-26 13:28:20 UTCFuss-im-Ohr jetzt hab ich schon einen Note angefügt.....
32017-07-26 13:29:49 UTCFuss-im-Ohr dafür stimmt aber die FaxNr nicht ganz, das merkt natürlich keiner :-)
42017-07-26 13:35:26 UTCmueschel Das übersieht man durchaus, vor allem wenn da nur ein Link steht und keine Erklärung. Da es sich um eine Bezahlmethode handelt, sollte der Tag wohl 'payment:vtm = yes' heißen, besser noch payment:vtm-fair, damit es eindeutiger zugeordnet ist.
52017-07-26 13:42:54 UTCFuss-im-Ohr das macht sogar Sinn, da es noch ein "neuer" Tag ist müsste man es im Wiki auch mal zur Diskussion stellen. Im IRC gab es noch keine Meinung dazu
62017-07-26 13:53:44 UTCmueschel Du kannst es einfach hier eintragen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:payment#Tankkarten
Das Tagging-Schema ist ja etabliert, da braucht es meiner Meinung nach keine Diskussion.
12017-07-25 11:27:01 UTCmueschel Was meinst du denn mit "scheduled"? Üblicherweise nehmen wir doch preproposed / proposed / planned / construction.
Gruß, Jan
22017-07-27 21:51:51 UTCJojo4u Ich dachte ich mache nochmal Werbung für mein scheduled-Proposal. Aber jetzt am Desktop sehe ich bei Taginfo nur 2 Objekte. Aber planned wird ja auch noch nicht gerendert...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Scheduled_lifecycle
32017-09-26 09:18:16 UTCGerdP Bitte ändern. Ich finde, wir haben wirklich genug etablierte Möglichkeiten, einen Weg zu mappen, den es nicht gibt.
ciao, Gerd
42017-10-03 19:27:36 UTCJojo4u Welches Tag würdest du bevorzugen? Proposed oder planned?
52017-10-03 19:32:08 UTCGerdP Ich kenne die Sachlage nicht. Scheduled klingt nach "irgendwas in Richtung Bau passiert bereits" und das wäre dann mehr planned als proposed.
62017-10-05 17:55:17 UTCJojo4u habe es als highway=planned gesetzt
12017-07-23 09:06:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
this changeset contains 24 times the tag "farrmland", note the spelling mistake.
Could you have a look and fix it?
Cheers, Jan
22017-07-23 10:47:03 UTCMichaelCollinson Jan, Thanks for pointing that out. Yes, I will fix it.
12017-07-23 09:04:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some ways with these tags:
edited=true
import=yes
I guess these are not needed and can be removed?

Jan
22017-07-25 23:56:37 UTCVLD009 Hi Jan,
Thank you for your message! The import=yes is used to tag our contributions. This is further explained in the wiki [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing] where our process is documented. The edited=true tag is an internal tag and is not needed - we removed the tag. Th...
12017-07-23 09:01:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tags on some of the buildings?
These look rather strange to me:
ww=1
ww3=1

And, "signage=Korean" - this is not common in OSM, what do you want to describe with this tag?

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-23 11:28:06 UTCWei Wu Hi,
Sorry for making you confused, we're now working on a project about Korean-Chinese isolation in Garibong-dong based on the usages and signage of buildings.
Signage-Korean means these commercial buildings only have Korean signs, and we also marked other buildings as Korean-Chinese or Korean -En...
12017-07-23 09:00:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain how you added these huge landuse areas? According to satellite images, they don't seem to be correct. For example, there is a larger town in one of your landuse=farmland and vice versa.

Additionally, you used the unknown keys "Eneo" and "Matumizi". Can ...
12017-07-23 08:55:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
on these trees I found several tags which are not common in OSM - maybe you can have a look and find more common ones?
Cheers, Jan

animate=yes
area=not applicable
established=1988-12-02
sign=improperly
size=not applicable
vitality=3
22017-07-23 09:40:57 UTCwmyrda All those tags in few minor chageset have their actual meaning which is a preparation of much larger data set from polish national registry of nature preservation. There is discussion in polish subforum about it https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=656206#p656206 I have explained there...
12017-07-22 12:47:47 UTCSK53 I wonder if the Carshalton Beeches should be promoted to a suburb with places like Carshalton-on-the-Hill as neighbourhoods. When I lived & worked around here 'Barrow Hedges catchment' was the key divide for Carshalton Beeches. The dividing line to N is a bit hard to pick out (everything S of ra...
22017-07-22 13:46:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
I don't know this area nor the situation - I just changed your "note_for_wikipedians" to the common "note" key so that editors are able to show it to other mappers.
12017-07-22 12:06:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
please have a look to the Wiki on how to map traffic signs:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-20 11:04:09 UTCmueschel ... and another set of 852 wrong address tags.
22017-07-20 14:35:28 UTCAndrew Matheny Fixed! Thank you
12017-07-18 11:12:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
Something went wrong here - you added your user name to 49 trees as a tag, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4973522973

Could you have a look?
Jan
22017-07-18 12:47:05 UTCRayhan Hossen Hi Jan,

Thanks for your message.

I've just checked that changesets and yes, you're right. I don't have any clear idea but somehow I added my username as a tag on those trees. I'm gonna delete those tags.

Thanks a lot!

Regards,
Rayhan Hossen
12017-07-18 10:45:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the maxspeed on this way? Looks like a spelling mistake.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507556776

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-18 11:02:35 UTCAnonix35 It's corrected. Small error
12017-07-17 12:07:00 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was stellt dieser Knoten da? perch = yes und name = Perch sind leider keine Beschreibung, die in OSM gebräuchlich sind. Schau doch mal ins Wiki, wie überlicherweise getagged wird - oder beschreibe das Objekt hier genauer, dann kann ich weiterhelfen.
Gruß, Jan
12017-07-16 11:32:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added a strange tag on 97 objects:
"tourism=apartment=16"
Did you mean rooms = 16 or number_of_apartments = 16?

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-17 06:35:26 UTCAmbush Hi Jan,
it was a mistake, roomer wanted to set addr:housenumber = 16, but something went wrong =)

I've fixed it.

WBR, Pavel
12017-07-15 10:30:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these shapes? They don't have any valid tags. For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506808224

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-15 10:41:46 UTCgetBounds Thanks not sure what happened here. I think these are supposed to be holes in the park polygon. I'll have to check. I assume I can cut holes in polygons in iD?
12017-07-15 10:28:04 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM!
you added these tags to a node:
Acera ampliada = si
Alta visibilidad = si
Isleta o zona protegida = no
Rampa en linea con el cruce = si
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4962761018

This might be a good description of the object, but is not understood by any OSM-b...
12017-07-14 10:42:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
this stream as 18 foreign keys which don't look like they should appear in the OSM database. Could you have a look?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506460710

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-13 20:01:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some ways with strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506883545
Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan
22017-07-13 21:01:10 UTCChristianA Haha, the road data came from an open dataset from the Swedish road administration. I forgot to change the attributes from some of the roads. I will fix it.
32017-07-13 21:16:08 UTCChristianA How can I find all roads that have the bad data?
42017-07-14 08:21:55 UTCmueschel You can use overpass-turbo and its Wizard:

http://overpass-turbo.eu?w=STARTAVST=*+global

Looks like there is only one way left:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506288954
12017-07-12 11:28:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of the name of this street (and its second part)?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233256198

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-12 11:11:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
when mapping service times, you don't need to use several tags for all the days. They can be combined into one:
service_times=So 07:30; 10:00; 19:00
service_times_1=Sat 19:00
service_times_2=Fr 19:30
service_times_3=Wed 15:00

service_times = Su 07:30, 10:00, 19:00; Sa 19:00; Fr 19:30; We...
22017-07-12 21:46:54 UTCAjBelnuovo Jan , ok , obrigado pelas informações . Vou editar como de acordo com as informações que me enviou.

Abraços , Airton
12017-07-10 08:05:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? The tag 70 = 90 looks strange.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505304853

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-10 08:19:25 UTCSenbee Just corrected. Thank you.
Cheers, Stefano
12017-07-10 07:01:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many points with tags like these:
BLOCK_No \t017
HOUSE_No \tPNB BANK
WARD_No \t51
ZONE_No \tZONE-D
Unfortunately, this information can not be used by any OSM tool or map. Please have a look to the wiki how addresses have to mapped so that they can be found and shown:
https://wik...
22017-07-10 23:23:44 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
12017-07-10 06:58:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check some other mapped areas to find out how streets are commonly mapped in OSM. Drawing the outline of the road might look nice in some map, but is otherwise rather useless.
If you have questions, feel free to contact the OSM community!
22017-07-10 23:23:45 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
12017-07-10 06:29:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
are there really 90 hotels with the same name in this city?
22017-07-10 23:23:41 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
12017-07-09 14:18:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of "disabled_vehicle=no"?
http://osm.org/way/505049343 and 2 more
Cheers, Jan
22017-07-09 16:16:59 UTCAllroads Hello,
You find it ;-), this recently added tag. Because of a traffic sign.
Netherlands traffic_signs https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden#C:_Geslotenverklaring
says at C9 or C13 or C14 or C15.

"gehandicaptenvoertuigen" a "voertuíg...
32017-07-09 17:19:48 UTCmueschel Alright. Looked like a mistake to me, not knowing the details.
12017-07-09 14:29:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check the tagging of some of the nodes - they all have tags which don't look like they belong to OSM. For example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505332377

Jan
12017-07-09 14:26:02 UTCmueschel Hier stimmt etwas nicht mit der direction:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4950394110
22017-07-10 07:37:42 UTCLoneship Danke für den Hinweis, habe es korrigiert.
12017-07-09 14:24:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node? I guess something went wrong with the name tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4950931435
Cheers, Jan
12017-07-09 14:22:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these rooms? They have many tags which don't look like they should appear in OSM, for example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505040179

chinese_t = 312演藝廳
english = auditorium
label = 演藝廳
navi = true
show_label = true
show_region...
12017-07-09 13:56:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

Please keep in mind that the correct spelling of tags is very important in OSM - otherwise software can not understand the meaning. E.g. this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505828897
There must be no capital letters ("Yes", "Wheelchair", "Wid...
22017-07-10 12:24:23 UTCvirvv Hello Jan,

Thank you very much for your comments.

Regards

Vir
12017-07-06 08:36:37 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du gibst bei deinen Ergänzungen von Hofläden verschiedene Webseiten als Quelle an. Ich habe mehrere davon überprüft und auf keiner einen Hinweis gefunden, dass die Daten frei verwendet werden dürfen. In OSM dürfen nur Daten eingetragen werden, deren Lizenz kompa...
22017-07-07 09:53:03 UTCmartindick56 Hallo "mueschel",
Vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Würde das nun heissen, dass alle Webseiten-Verweise gelöscht werden müssten? Und wie steht es mit den anderen Informationen zu den erwähnten Hofläden, welche z.B. von Telsearch stammen?
Natürlich kö...
32017-07-07 11:15:12 UTCmueschel Ich weiß es nicht, aber ich fürchte, dass telesearch da durchaus eine Klausel in den Nutzungsbedingungen hat, die nur die persönliche Nutzung erlaubt, aber nicht die kommerzielle Weitergabe. (OSM selbst ist zwar nicht kommerziell, aber die Daten dürfen dann auch für kommerz...
42017-07-07 12:34:02 UTCmartindick56 Schön, das ganze scheint sich noch weiter zu komplizieren...
Schau mal auf der webseite www.anhbl.ch nach. Dort habe ich alle Organisationen und Körperschaften (Gemeinden, Bürgergemeinden, Naturschutzorganisationen, Stiftungen, alles was im engeren und weiteren Sinn mit Natur- und He...
52017-07-08 08:00:49 UTCSimonPoole Einzelne Informationen von den Webseiten der Objekte (den Hofläden) zu übernehmen ist wohl weitestgehend problemlos, was aber nicht geht, ist ohne Erlaubnis Verzeichnisse und Sammlungen solcher Informationen zu nutzen ohne Erlaubnis (die Ersteller solcher Verzeichnisse haben ja meistens au...
62017-07-11 13:02:29 UTCmartindick56 Lieber Simon,
Ich werde bei den Verzeichnis-Anbietern (es sind etwa 10 verschiedene) nachfragen und bei fehlender Erlaubnis ihren Eintrag unter Source löschen.

Freundliche Grüsse
Martin
72017-07-11 19:45:53 UTCmartindick56 Hallo zusammen,
Inzwischen habe ich bei https://www.falstaff.at nachgefragt und per Mail die Erlaubnis gekriegt, diese Daten für Kartierungen zu nutzen. Wo soll diese Information abgelegt werden. Weiss jemad darüber Bescheid?
12017-07-05 11:28:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
the key "bike_friend" has not been used anywhere in OSM so far. I guess you mean "motorcycle_friendly" - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Amotorcycle_friendly

And: Please don't forget to add comments to changesets!

Jan
22017-07-05 12:43:43 UTCHammershoej Hi,
bike_friend is a new tag. It is used to show that the location in question is registered as bike friendly. It is a programme offered by the local tourist organisation for Southern Funen:
http://www.visitsvendborg.dk/denmark/vil-du-vaere-bike-friend

It is on my to-do list to write documentat...
32017-07-05 12:46:23 UTCHammershoej As to writing changeset comments, I admit to skipping. This is a limit to both Potlatch and iD. It simply takes too much time when there is a seperate changeset for each of 90 changes. Problem is that for each point I have to return to the main page, search for the location and then edit. I can't do...
42017-07-05 12:49:23 UTCmueschel The term "bike" is not used in OSM because it is ambiguous - it could be motorcycle of bicycle. i suggest to follow the existing tagging scheme of "motorcycle_friendly" and use "bicycle_friendly".

Apart from that, if you add data from an external source, you have to ...
52017-07-05 13:52:07 UTCHammershoej License: I know this of cause and have cleared it before starting.

As to naming, I see your point, but I also find it counter-intuitive to tag a programme called 'Bike Friend' as 'cycle_friend'.

Please hold your horses and questions until I have written the documentation.
12017-07-05 11:35:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this object? You changed the park to a huge highway. I guess this was a mistake...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6148865/history

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-03 10:50:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
I understand that it is important to collect information about emergency plans. But I don't think it helps to add hundreds of nodes without any meaningful tag. This data is just in the database, but no tool will be able to find these nodes or display them in any meaningful way.
22017-07-03 11:28:58 UTCbsmith54 Hi,
Thank you so much for catching this! I'm working on a project in collaboration with the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, and completely missed this (incredibly important!) observation. I'll make sure to go back and update those nodes appropriately. Any additional insights you have would ...
12017-07-03 09:02:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
did you really want to add this huge amount of foreign tags to ways like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105028180

Jan
22017-07-03 11:32:41 UTCLogicalViolinist No I didnt sorry about that. I'll get it corrected when I have access to a computer. Thanks for spotting it.
32017-07-04 14:44:31 UTCLogicalViolinist I've corrected the issues. Thank you for pointing it out.
12017-07-02 14:08:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added a strange tag to the three lifts here:
abandoned:aerialway=drag_lift = forest
Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-02 21:37:59 UTCSembola Corrected, I really don't know what happened...
Thanks for checking
12017-07-02 13:59:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
sure you can add the name in any language. You have to find the 3-letter code of the language (wikipedia is very helpful) and add it to the name key.
If it's not a language, but just a different name, you can use e.g. old_name or loc_name keys.

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-09 18:22:15 UTCSupaplex 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯! 歡迎加入開放街圖,群眾共同參與,繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料,歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ta...
12017-07-02 13:54:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of tags. I just fixed several:
addr:sity -> addr:city,
nameaddr:housenumber -> addr:housenumber
I don't know if I catched all, please check.

Jan
12017-07-01 10:36:53 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was hat es mit dem Key "ref (OHA)" auf sich, das du hier benutzt? Hat sich die Straßennummer geändert, dann ist der Platz für die alte Nummer der Key "old_ref". Und gib bitte in deinen Changesets auch die Quelle der Änderungen und einen Kommentar an.\...
22017-07-01 15:00:34 UTCdocschenk Hallo Jan, grundsätzlich ist mir bekannt, dass old_ref der richtige Key wäre. Nur was macht man, wenn der reif öfter wechselt? Der Landkreis Osterode hat mit Göttingen fusioniert, alle Kreisstraßen des Altkreises OHA bekommen jetzt eine 400er Nummer (7 -> 407 usw.). Da d...
32017-07-01 17:12:05 UTCmueschel Ich würde diese Information weglassen. old_ref akzeptiert auch mehrere Werte, getrennt durch ";". Wenn du den OHA noch erwähnen willst, geht etwas wie
old_ref:OHA, das benutzt die übliche Syntax eines namespaces. Das würde ich aber nur zusätzlich zum gängigen...
12017-07-01 09:38:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
in this edit you used some keys like these to map destinations:
colour:back:backward
colour:text:backward
direction:backward

Typically, other keys are used, like 'destination' and 'destination:colour'. Could you have a look and adapt to this scheme? Here is a Wiki page with some examples:...
12017-07-01 09:25:04 UTCmueschel Could you check this import as well? These tags don't look they belong to OSM:

J_DESC=2.1.1.1 - prevalentemente seminativi senza vegetazione sparsa
area_mq=291039.54
clc_lvl1=2
clc_lvl2=21
clc_lvl3=211
clc_lvl4=2111
id=1199
isolati_ID=143
tipo_area=Non ...
12017-07-01 09:22:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like something went wrong with this import of buildings: They all have tags which should not appear in the OSM database. Could you check this?
E.g.
altezza=2.81
id=2521
isolati_ID=136
layer=0207I-Tettoia O Pensilina Invariato
superficie=168.65
tipoedific=...
12017-06-30 12:58:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
was heißt denn "maxbreight"? Vielleicht maxwidth?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4934180080

Gruß, Jan
22017-07-01 07:47:19 UTCgekapes Hi Jan,

danke, dass Du es gesehen hast. Ich habe schon ausgebessert.
Ich weiss selber nicht, wieso ich es so getaggt habe.

Gruss,
Jeka
12017-06-29 21:07:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several objects with many strange tags. None of them is a tag we typically use. For example this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502831987

Could you have a look and revise the tagging to use common tags?
Cheers, Jan
22017-07-10 23:23:46 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
12017-06-29 07:48:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

you added several points with information about the number of inhabitants. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. Also, our database in case sensitive, all keys have to be in lower case...
12017-06-28 11:44:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, it has many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4930534149

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-28 07:38:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "dbh" on these nodes. It is not used anywhere else up to now - what is meaning of this key?
22017-07-07 17:42:52 UTCUndearius I suppose late is better than never.
DBH is Diameter at Breast Height.
It was part of an ongoing discussion on the import mailing list and has since been converted to circumference.
These nodes will be deleted and replaced with the proper ones.
12017-06-28 07:37:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
all of these ways have many tags which don't seem to belong to the OSM database, e.g.:

date=no
full_id=w667896
ispaved=True
osm_id=667896
osm_type=way
telenav_cy=CHANGED
22017-06-28 12:22:34 UTCioanam_telenav Hello!
Sorry, it was my mistake. I have changed and uploaded the tags according to the OSM database.
32017-06-28 13:19:54 UTCioanam_telenav I have worked on a specific data set and I have accidentally uploaded it. But I have deleted everything that has mistakenly been uploaded. Now it should be fine.
12017-06-27 13:17:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. You added a lot of points here, but none of them has any meaningful tags. Please take your time to read in the OSM Wiki how tagging has to be done to be useful in any application that uses OSM data.
22017-10-13 07:40:18 UTCGerdP I've reverted most of this changeset here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52880303
12017-06-27 11:32:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Tag "lanes2" schauen? Scheint mir eher eine destination in irgendeine Richtung zu sein. Und 'maxspeed:source' sollte eher 'source:maxspeed' heißen.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353516976
Gruß, Jan
12017-06-26 10:34:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
ich habe hier an einigen Knoten Tippfehler korrigiert (sowas wie 'newtork' oder 'public_tranport'). Ich weiß nicht, ob ich alle erwischt habe, vielleicht kannst du auch nochmal drüberschauen. Gruß, Jan
22017-06-26 10:43:39 UTCHairyCoo Danke für deine Aufmerksamkeit! Ich werde noch mal überprüfen! MfG HairyCoo
12017-06-25 17:15:13 UTCmueschel Woher stammt die Information, dass das hier die K246 ist? Schilder habe ich da bis jetzt noch keine sehen können.
22017-06-25 18:56:46 UTCfurban das habe ich wohl hier gelesen https://www.karben.de/rathaus-buergerservice/projekte/nordumgehung/
32017-06-25 19:05:44 UTCTourenbikerFKB http://www.deges.de/Startseite/L-3351-Ortsumgehung-Karben-eroeffnet-E1440.htm

Hier wird sie als L3351. Die frühere L3351 durch den Ortskern wurde zurückgestuft.

Am besten mal bei Hessen Mobil erkundigen.
42017-06-25 19:06:28 UTCTourenbikerFKB ...soll heißen: mit L3351 bezeichnet.
52017-06-25 20:27:01 UTCmueschel Genau, sie soll die L3351 werden. Habe aber keine Beschilderung gesehen, dass das schon passiert ist.
62017-06-26 06:03:28 UTCfurban Dann bau es doch um. Kann man ja immer noch wieder anders machen. Aber es klingt ja nur logisch das diese Straße eher mal ein Lxxx als ein Kxxx sein sollte.
12017-06-25 18:11:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "lcr_ref" to several roads - did you mean "lcn_ref"?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-25 18:16:55 UTCSebastian Pleško yes. i'm going to soon remove it anyway and make "relations" instead. i finally got a map from the local municipality (was really hard to find) where exactly the bicycle paths go.
12017-06-24 20:25:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "ScientificName" on some nodes - in OSM we have the tag "species" (as well as "genus") for that. If you want to tag the English name of the species, you can use "species:en".

Jan
22017-06-29 22:21:06 UTCSK53 Also the key taxon (effectively synonymous with species a lot of the time, but most useful when cultivars come into play as with many stree trees)
12017-06-24 20:15:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
Kannst du hier nochmal nach dem payment-Tag schauen? Mit eckigen Klammern kann man da wohl nicht bezahlen :-)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4917650794
22017-06-24 20:18:52 UTCtbm Fixed, thanks!
12017-06-24 20:10:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way just got one strange tag and is missing an "highway" Tag. Could you have a look?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500714135

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-24 18:22:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - too many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502976662
Cheers, Jan
22017-08-16 19:49:21 UTCnaoliv realkaka, esses dados que você utilizou aqui são de onde, por favor?
32017-08-16 20:08:48 UTCrealkaka naoliv, dos setores censitários do IBGE.
42017-08-16 20:12:25 UTCnaoliv Beleza. Valeu!
12017-06-23 18:44:45 UTCmueschel Die Linie 74 hält in Vilbel weder am Bussteig A noch B, sondern ausschließlich an E. Sie war allerdings absichtlich nicht eingetragen, weil es sich dabei nur um 2 Schülerfahrten pro Schultag handelt, und wir solche Schulbusse oft gar nicht erfassen.
22017-06-24 19:27:36 UTCTetiSoft Danke für die Info, habe Linie 74 (die vorher übrigens schon eingetragen war aber IIRC ab Heinrich-Heine-Straße statt Bahnhof fuhr) korrigiert. Habe auch ref und local_ref für die Haltepositionen am Bahnhof gesetzt.
12017-06-23 13:03:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
das Tag hier sieht merkwürdig aus...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2313608108

Gruß, Jan
12017-06-23 12:50:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check the tagging. Email, Phone and Website are no valid keys in OSM.
Also, please don't misuse the description tag for extended advertising texts.
22017-06-28 09:40:20 UTCHilton Hotels Thank you for turning our attention to the wrongly entered tags. All of this has been fixed. Thank you once again.
12017-06-23 12:42:22 UTCmueschel Could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39437968
'maxspeed:f' is not a valid tag.
22017-06-26 06:13:16 UTCalinan_telenav Hello,
Thank you for pointing this out for me. I changed the tag.
Have a nice day,
Alina
12017-06-23 12:41:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
could you explain the meaning of the tags you added here? I don't fully see what you want to express and in the current state it also can not be interpreted by software.
You could have a look to the wiki to see how bus stops are currently mapped.
12017-06-23 12:14:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
the 198 objects you added here contain some rather strange tags:
CODE=WALL
COLOUR_NU=16
GROUP=BuildingL
LENGTH=22.406
NUMBER=1025
TYPE=Line
Where these added by mistake or is there some useful information contained?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-22 08:54:02 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du gibst hier als Quelle ein Buch an - hast du eine schriftliche Genehmigung, diese Daten in OSM zu übernehmen? Die Lizenz unter der Quellen stehen, muss mit der ODbL von OSM kompatibel sein.
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-22 14:37:54 UTCosm_Ralef Hallo Jan,
ich war etwas blauäugig, diese Infos so einzustellen. Bin nicht davon ausgegangen, das die hier schon urherberrechtlich interessant ist, da nur kurze Auszüge mit Quellenangabe. Eine Genehmigung wird auch schwierig, da der Verfasser leider 2001 verstorben ist.

Ich werde alle ...
12017-06-21 20:42:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "litname = no". Did you mean "lit=no"?
www.openstreetmap.org/way/483249177
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-22 14:27:31 UTCLowe253 Hi, mueschel

you guessed right. Already fixed.

Thanks
12017-06-21 20:23:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
between 6th and 7th street you created 3 overlapping roads. Could you check and fix that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-21 19:39:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of this tag?
ata_delete:construction \t2017-06-30
on node http://osm.org/node/2499396427

If there is some temporary construction, it's best to use the "temporary" prefix or "conditional" suffix, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_fea...
12017-06-21 12:36:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
dieser Tag hier stimmt leider auch nicht so ganz:
"access:agricultural:forward:conditional =\tnone @ maxweight"
Keine Gewichtsbeschränkung für landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge wäre

maxweight:forward:conditional = none @ agricultural

Grüße, Jan
22017-06-21 18:30:23 UTCProtoxenus habs geändert......
12017-06-20 21:22:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tags "moped_p" and "moped_a" in this changeset. These are not used very often - moped_P and moped_A are used more often. Could you adapt to this more common spelling of the keys?
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-21 11:53:04 UTCM!dgard Hi Jan

Tags with capital letters don't fit in with the other tags. For example for emergency=aed it was voted explicitly to use lowercase.

I'm aware that moped_A is more popular at the moment, but unless it is standardized to use uppercase (there're only two mentions about it in the wiki, no d...
32017-06-21 12:27:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're right, upper case keys are rare. But looking at the statistics, we have e.g. 550 moped_A, but only 30 moped_a. In my opinion, the best way is to first adopt the more common scheme and in parallel start a discussion in the local community. Then we can do an automated retagging once there ...
42017-06-21 12:39:33 UTCM!dgard (Erratum: it was voted as emergency=defibrillator, not aed, but the vote for the lowercase option got significantly more votes than the uppercase one.)
52017-06-21 12:59:28 UTCM!dgard > the best way is to first adopt the more common scheme and in parallel start a discussion in the local community

The problem is that the discussion will cite usage numbers, they are one of the metrics that are used to do an informal vote. I don't support that though, those are too easily infl...
62017-06-21 13:08:28 UTCM!dgard Matching some more different combinations with the mopeds:

Uppercase: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pVA 706 ways
Lowercase: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pVB 379 ways

So the difference is definitely not an order of magnitude.
12017-06-20 21:30:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
du nutzt hier die Tags
maxweight:lanes:left=12t
mindistance:hgv:lanes:right=50m
Das Suffix :left bzw. :right ist in diesem Zusammenhang nicht definiert - was möchtest du ausdrücken?
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-21 07:27:24 UTCProtoxenus Die Brücke ist so um die 50 Jahre alt und nicht für das andauernde Befahren mit 40t-LKW konstruiert. Deshalb gibt es eine Einschränkung: linker Fahrstreifen Fahrzeuge mit maximal 12t, rechter Fahrstreifen mit minimalem Abstand von 50m für LKW. Das habe ich versucht, umzusetzen.
32017-06-21 07:32:21 UTCmueschel Alles klar, das würde dann so aussehen:
maxweight:lanes = 12t |
mindistance:hgv:lanes = | 50
Bei ":lanes" werden einfach die Eigenschaften aller Spuren aufgezählt, von links nach rechts, getrennt mit "|", Spuren ohne Eigenschaften bleiben leer.
42017-06-21 07:35:38 UTCProtoxenus Ok, daran hatte ich nicht gedacht. Danke für den Hinweis.
12017-06-11 09:18:30 UTCwhb Was bedeutet denn "2017 = 4 km/h"?
z.B. hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118342708
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60175718
22017-06-13 16:07:51 UTCdornweg Was "2017 = 4 km/h" bedeutet würde mich auch interessieren. Der Eintrag war schon vorhanden, und ich wollte ihn nicht einfach löschen.
32017-06-20 19:59:36 UTCmueschel Da muss ich dich leider enttäuschen, den Tag gibt es erst seit diesem Changeset. Ich lösche ihn dann mal.
12017-06-20 11:10:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found a speling mistake on 43 ways: area:higway instead of area:highway - could you have a look and fix it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-20 19:50:29 UTCCiemek Hi
I corrected spelling mistakes
12017-06-20 11:08:19 UTCmueschel Please stop adding new objects and sort out your spelling mistakes. Most of the data you added is completely useless because of spelling mistakes. It's likely we have to fully delete it because it would take days to clean everything up by hand.
12017-06-19 10:56:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many objects with foreign tags which don't look like they should appear in OSM data, e.g.
ALAND=0
AWATER=433
HYDROID=110783668525
INTPTLAT=+35.5385696
INTPTLON=-93.4273783
MTFCC=H2030

Could you have a look and clean this up?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-19 10:48:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw you added the tag "width:parking:lane:both" on several ways. This tag is not used in any other place up to now. In other places, the tag is "parking:lane:both:width". Could you change this to the common tag?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-21 04:13:55 UTCtheangrytomato Whoops, sorry about that. Should have it fixed tonight!
Bradley
12017-06-19 10:20:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check all your tagging of nodes for correctness. Spelling is very important! Most of these tags with spelling mistakes were added by you and can not be used at all in OSM:

add: city\t
add:city\t
add:place\t
add:street\t
addr : city\t
addr : street\t
Addr:\t
Addr: city\t...
12017-06-17 08:13:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
du hast hier Tags wie 'roadbike-smoothness', 'roadbike:soothness' und 'roadbike:smoothness' hinzugefügt, jeweils etwa 80 Mal.
Diese Tags gibt es bisher nicht, und sie entsprechen auch nicht den üblichen Taggingregeln.
a) 2 davon haben Schreibfehler, das letzte ist das korrekteste.
...
22017-06-17 08:46:06 UTCmatchman Hallo Jan,
ähnlich dem mtb:scale tag geht es mir darum die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit aus der Sicht eines Rennradfahrers darzustellen und diese zu klassifizieren. Der smoothness key ist hierfür leider nicht präzise genug.
Ich würde den key in smoothness:roadbike ändern...
32017-06-19 08:51:30 UTCmueschel Ok. Eine Dokumentation in Form eines Proposals sollte es dann schon geben. Am besten natürlich gleich mit Blick auf alle möglichen Verkehrsteilnehmer, nicht nur auf Radfahrer bezogen.
12017-06-17 18:07:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of tags. Only correctly spelled tags can be used by OSM software.
E.g. I found 40 objects with the tag 'operater', which should read 'operator'.
I didn't check all your edits, but I also found a "amenity=post office" which should be "amenity=po...
12017-06-17 18:03:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found you added several objects with strange tags, like these:
open space =yes
play ground =godwari-14,makhu boou
This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look to the wiki about common
tags for shops or am...
12017-06-16 18:05:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcomr to OSM! Please watch out for the spelling of tags, it's "building", "addr:city" and 'colour'. I corrected some of these,but maybe I missed a few.
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-16 17:57:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging? Looks like name and ele tags somehow got mixed.

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-16 18:15:56 UTCdaniel-ibex Hi - the log cabin shelter is out-of-path - node 4904544425, v2 is independently - cordially

sorry , I do not speak English
12017-06-15 13:39:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4904979640

Looks like something went wrong with the name tag.
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-15 15:25:52 UTCTe-Ika Oh yep, got it fixed, thanks!
12017-06-15 13:37:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "wayID" to several roads. This key is not used anywhere else - what is the meaning? Is it an official number? This is tagged as 'ref' usually.

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-15 13:36:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this tagging: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46615603

The tag "M = 4" looks like a mistake.
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-15 13:29:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw you added some destination tags lately. I would like to point out the usual order of suffixes, e.g.
destination:colour:lanes:backward
(not destination:lanes:colour:backward)

In general, the scheme is:
key[:subkey][:hgv|:bicycle|...][:lanes][:forward|:backward|:both_ways] = *


...
12017-06-14 11:46:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
'socket:schuko:output' wird bis jetzt nicht verwendet, 'socket:schuko:current' ist (auch für andere Stecker) wesentlich verbreiteter.
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-14 13:49:13 UTCschnism Hi,

ich war mir da auch nicht sicher, und habe mich darum am Wiki orientiert:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Auch taginfo sagt leider garnichts dazu:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=charging_station#combinations

Beides mappen ist auch ...
32017-06-14 14:24:38 UTCmueschel Ja, die "Kombinationen" sind da nicht umfassend genug für seltene Tags. Ich habe hier geschaut:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/socket:type2#similar

Unter der Stecker-Tabelle im Wiki taucht "socket:type2:output" tatsächlich auf, wird aber im Gegensatz zu curr...
12017-06-14 12:51:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the spelling of the key "Source:maxspeed" on 90 ways? It should be lower case, 'source:maxspeed'.

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-14 11:59:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the 'capacity:' tag here? Something's missing.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498675775
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-14 11:55:32 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498610347
I guess those tags shouldn't be there, or the way should be closed or part of a relation. And I don't see the meaning of the 'fff' key.

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-14 13:54:52 UTCMichaelCollinson Thanks Jan for finding this. Incomplete edit. I have completed it now.
12017-06-14 11:48:15 UTCmueschel Kann man das wieder löschen?
22017-06-18 08:48:59 UTCRisou Ja
12017-06-14 11:36:38 UTCmueschel This changeset contains another set of 380 misspelled address tags, addr_house,
addr_stree.

Please fix this before uploading!
22017-06-14 14:38:23 UTCAndrew Matheny Corrected in changeset 49531966. Thanks!
12017-06-14 11:31:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
ich habe zwei Tipps zum Erfassen von Wegweisern:
a) wenn du Keys wie 'direction_west_1' benutzt, schreibe 'direction_west:1', das ist die übliche Form zum Nummerieren.
b) Ich empfehle Relationen um solche Schilder zu erfassen, das ist wesentlich genauer und einfacher auszuwerten, siehe: ...
12017-06-13 10:52:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this container?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4896938441

"domestic_oil" is not used as a key up to now. Maybe "recycling:cooking_oil = yes"?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-13 10:49:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Namen schauen? Da stimmt das Tagging nicht.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29468157

Gruss, Jan
12017-06-13 10:48:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this place node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4898346197

"Lera = asphalt" looks like a mistake.
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-13 10:59:15 UTCzvenzzon Thanks a lot, it's now corrected.
12017-06-13 10:38:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag you put on this node looks a bit strange:
xmas \t= Traffic calming bump
Did you mean "traffic_calming = bump"?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-13 12:50:31 UTCszydzio Hi! Yes indeed, I meant traffic_calming = bump. I was just an old node imported by OsmAnd which for some unknown reason adds this strange tag. I cleaned it up - thanks for the hint!
12017-06-13 10:35:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier nochmal über die Adressen schauen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497998566
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497998573
Tags wie dieses sehen nach einem Fehler aus:
89a = Am Winkel

Gruß, Jan
12017-06-13 10:25:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier gibt es 97 Bäume mit dem Tag "de:genus". Das sollte richtig "genus:de" heißen. Schaust du da bitte nochmal drüber?

Gruß, Jan
22017-06-13 12:05:23 UTCkartonage Uff, richtig blöder Dreher. Habe es korrigiert, danke!
12017-06-13 10:23:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your edits in this area I saw about 80 cases of a spelling mistake "destionation" instead of "destination". Could you please check this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-12 10:54:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this barrier and the one close by?
http://osm.org/node/4895536995
The tag "hoy =30" looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-12 12:31:35 UTCAllroads Yes, changed it. i can not clarify, why this tag. I believe, I merged it. And was already there.
12017-06-12 10:40:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "source=google" here. Please not that information from google is not allowed to be added in OSM due to the terms of usage / licenses. Please remove the information you got from Google, otherwise we might have to delete the whole object.
Jan
12017-06-11 10:34:31 UTCmueschel Moin,
kannst du bitte hier nochmal über die Adressen schauen? Das Tag "addr:coutry=DE" sollte eigentlich "addr:country=DE" sein - ist aber eigentlich auch unnötig, weil Grenzen bei uns sehr gut erfasst sind.

Gruß, Jan
22017-06-12 10:47:37 UTCJanisJf Ja war ein doofer fortgeführter copy & paste Rechtschreibfehler :O Hab es schon gefixt.
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49464049)
12017-06-11 10:30:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 3 nodes with strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4895835026
Looks like something went wrong with importing your GPS data. Could you have a look?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-11 10:36:47 UTCAndersAndersson Hello,
Thanks for pointing that out. I add a lot of nodes from my GPS surveys. Sometimes I forget to remove the extra data that my Garmin GPS device adds. I have fixed that node now, and will do a search for similar data with overpass-turbo.eu.
12017-06-11 10:22:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "alt_ name" to 31 streets. Could you fix the spelling of the key, there should be no space, like "alt_name".

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-07 20:15:57 UTCtrigpoint Hi, this gate looks a little wrong as it has 3 ways connecting to it. It needs to be separate from the junction otherwise it is impossible to tell which routes pass through the gate,
Cheers Phil
22017-06-07 20:17:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
that's not my work, it was added by http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49075370

Cheers, Jan
32017-06-07 20:46:10 UTCtrigpoint Hi Jan
Sorry, I will see if I can work it out.

Cheers Phil
12017-06-07 11:52:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several objects with strange tags like 54 =77
601 =77
Could you check that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-07 11:38:50 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM. Bitte schau mal ins Wiki, wie Addressen und POIs bezeichnet werden müssen. All diese Informationen sind z.Z. nicht auswertbar, weil sie nicht dem normalen Schema entsprechen.

adress \tEinener Dorfbauerschaft 30
ort \tWarendorf
plz \t48231
telefon \t4925841666\...
12017-06-07 11:28:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
das Tag "capacity:undisabled" gibt es bis jetzt nirgends sonst. Warum nicht das normale "capacity:disabled"?

Gruss, Jan
12017-05-31 13:10:21 UTCholgerd the field paper: http://fieldpapers.org/snapshots/3dsblppm#17/52.49256790905722/13.42859263080393
22017-06-06 11:00:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du diesen Node nochmal überprüfen bzgl Toiletten?

Gruß, Jan

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/700732539

toilets:wheelchair \tno
toilets:wheelchair_1 \tyes
12017-06-06 10:56:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
this is another set of nodes with no valid tag, but a lot of foreign stuff. Please clean up your data before importing it to OSM!

Jan
12017-06-06 10:38:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this roundabout? It has several strange tags.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496820690

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-08 00:10:19 UTCSunfishtommy I took away the tags I don't know where they came from.
12017-06-05 20:39:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "dsscreated=#brunch" on several POIs, could you explain it?

Btw, please have a look to the Wiki about tagging of opening_hours - there is a well defined syntax to make it machine-readable.

Jan
12017-06-05 20:34:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put these tags on some ways:

maxweight = 3.5
maxweight:condition = yes @ service
The conditional tag doesn't seem to be right (yes is not a valid value for maxweight and @ service is not defined)

Can you explain what you want to tag here?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-05 20:37:43 UTCYod4z the way is limited to 3.5 t but if the hgv is for service (trash, road construction...) it can go even if it has more than 3.5t.
12017-06-05 20:32:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
schaust du hier mal nach dem Versuch des Öffnungszeiten-Taggings? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496768509
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-05 20:47:43 UTCbielebog Ui, gut gesehen. Das war natürlich Quatsch und ist nun entfernt.
12017-06-04 19:23:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you checkt the tagging of this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494161242
The tag looks a bit strange:
"3 =\tcement_block"

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-04 19:06:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 115 ways have the key "operater", which should read "operator". Could you have a look and fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-05 02:12:47 UTCSupaplex Sure, I'll fix it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49254949
12017-06-04 19:00:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tags
"Gresham Street=no" and "Winchester Walk = no" in your edits. Could you explain this?

Thanks, Jan
22017-06-04 20:26:47 UTCMacLondon Sorry, these were pasted in error. I have removed them both,
Thanks, Mac
12017-06-03 16:46:14 UTCkreuzschnabel Diese Änderung hat Teile der Burgstraße etwa 300 m nach Westen verschoben, fast zum Bahnhof, und zehn andere, damit verbundene Straßen gleich hinterher! Sieht wild aus, ich bekomme das nicht auf die Schnelle sortiert. Baust du das bitte _gleich_ wieder zurück?

Leider haben ...
22017-06-03 19:13:39 UTCmueschel Großteils korrigiert in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49227401
Direkt am Platz östlich der Burg stimmt noch eine Kleinigkeit nicht, und die living_street-Fläche mit durchgehenden Straßen sieht merkwürdig aus, liegt aber nicht an diesem Changeset.
32017-06-04 10:38:02 UTCfkMohr Ich bitte vielmals um Entschuldigung!
Wollte lediglich die Wanderweg-Route aktualisieren. Als ich das mit den Straßen dann sah, wollte ich alles rückgängig machen, fand aber keine Möglichkeit mehr dazu.
Kann man bereits gespeicherte Änderungen nicht mehr unwirksam machen?...
42017-06-04 10:51:22 UTCkreuzschnabel Das mit dem Straßen-Ziehen muss ein Versehen gewesen sein; da waren wohl noch einige Nodes selektiert und sind dann mit der Maus mitgewandert. Wanderrouten werden in OSM als Relationen abgebildet, in denen die betreffenden Straßen(abschnitte) drin sind oder nicht; dazu muss eine Stra&szl...
52017-06-04 11:03:30 UTCfkMohr Danke; ich hatte nach einer "Verschiebemöglichkeit" für die Wanderwege gesucht, aber nicht gefunden und hatte daher nicht mehr richtige Teile gelöscht und wollte die geänderte Route einfügen. Derzeit sind alle drei Routen (26, 28 & 29, wieso zweimal 28?) unterb...
62017-06-04 11:35:54 UTCfkMohr Teilweise wurde die Führung von Weg 29 durch Weg 26 ersetzt; möglicherweise gibt es auch dafür ein Funktion, so dass Löschen und Neuerstellen nicht optimal wäre.
72017-06-04 12:17:25 UTCkreuzschnabel Mein Hund lässt ausrichten, wenn du noch was im Kühlschrank hast, können wir auch gern einen kleinen Ausflug nach Oberjosbach unternehmen und uns das gemeinsam anschauen.
82017-06-04 12:50:16 UTCfkMohr Ich bin zu Hause (Bohnheck 20, unweit BZO); nur Hundefutter habe ich nicht.
92017-06-04 13:08:58 UTCkreuzschnabel Dann sach ich ma, wir stehen gegen 16 Uhr vor der Tür von http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368529588. Eventuelle Katzen am besten außer Sicht schaffen :-)
102017-06-04 13:19:29 UTCfkMohr Freue mich, Euch kennenzulernen ...
12017-06-03 13:43:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
these wells contain quite some foreign tags. E.g. lon and lat should not appear as tags in OSM, keys should not use capital letters. Could you have a look and correct this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-02 10:52:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
did you really mean "bear = yes"?
And, could you move the node to one side of the road? I guess the restaurant is not in the middle of the street?
12017-06-02 10:45:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier gibt es einige Nodes mit ungewöhnlichen Tags wie "GB 58; GH = path". Könntest du da mal nachschauen und korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan
22017-06-07 10:54:39 UTCwhb Danke für den Hinweis!
Habe die Fehler verbessert.
12017-06-02 10:43:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added more than 30 ways with the tag "Highway=Footway" - please note that all tags are case sensitive and these should be lower case.

Also, elevators are tagged "min level" and "max level". According to the wiki, this should be e.g. "level = 0;1;2;3&quo...
22017-08-22 15:01:03 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check highway=0
What was meant ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496450447
12017-06-02 10:30:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several objects with very strange tags here, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496152016
area=89.7593806393
cota_p_a=55.41
fotografia=0
gid=44424
id_edifica=44424
id_lev=0.0
latlon=40°32'4.418"N 8°27'43.439"W
perimetro=56.7...
12017-05-31 09:53:38 UTCfreeExec please revert
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Lifecycle_prefix_.28.3Cstatus.3E:.3Ckey.3E_.3D_.3Cvalue.3E.29
22017-05-31 10:12:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
both versions are in use. The reason for my edit was your spelling mistake "constraction"
32017-05-31 15:50:07 UTCfreeExec It was necessary to correct the typo.
And now marked by a kind of amenity that does not exist in reality. Secondly, after the opening, more work is done to return the tag.
42017-05-31 16:25:37 UTCmueschel Alright, I changed it back.
12017-05-31 09:09:03 UTCopendcc Bicycle = official on a non rectangular building? Are you sure?
22017-05-31 09:19:28 UTCmueschel You're right, that's strange. I didn't put the tag there. I fixed the spelling of the key, but didn't notice it being strange for a building.

We have to ask rowers2, e.g. in this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48947839
12017-05-29 16:05:25 UTCMarkus366 Hallo,
dieser und weitere Abschnitte einer geplanten/ im Bau befindlichen Straßen wurden zuletzt mehrfach von verschiedenen Nutzern unterschiedlich getaggt. Häufig wurden die Schlüssel highway:construction , trunk: und construction: hin und her geändert. Vielleicht können ...
22017-05-29 17:14:33 UTCmueschel Siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48979895
12017-05-29 16:02:49 UTCMarkus366 Hallo,
dieser und weitere Abschnitte einer geplanten/ im Bau befindlichen Straßen wurde zuletzt mehrfach von verschiedenen Nutzern unterschiedliche getaggt. Häufig wurden die Schlüssel highway:construction , trunk: und construction: hin und her geändert. Vielleicht können...
22017-05-29 16:29:13 UTCMrWebber Hallo,
Ich weiß gar nicht wo das Problem noch liegt. Ich habe alle Fehler verbessert.

Gruß MrWebber
32017-05-29 17:14:17 UTCmueschel Dann kommentiere ich auch hier und nicht in meinem Changeset:
Erst highway = proposed, dann highway = construction (zunächst mit Tippfehler den ich korrigiert habe). Die letzte Änderung von t2425 verstehe ich nicht ganz, aber das hast du dann ja wieder geradegezogen.
12017-05-28 10:53:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded many objects with very strange tags here, like these:

addr:place \t02050
building \ttran thanh toan
highway \tdhok
landuse \t16092737352
place \t0340302730
shop \t56/26

This looks like something went wrong during an import. Can this be reverted?
Jan
12017-05-28 10:50:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "traffic_signals:directions" 16 times - the correct spelling would be "traffic_signals:direction". Could you fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-28 10:42:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495243526
The tag "loading zone = yes" doesn't exist yet.
Would these tags be what you try to express?
highway = service
area = yes
vehicle = delivery
?
22017-05-29 17:42:52 UTCLAEM Hi,

Yes, thank you.
12017-05-28 10:35:59 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ich habe hier an einigen Nodes den Key "slope_curb" gesehen, "sloped_curb" wäre richtig. Schaust du da mal nach?
Gruß, Jan
22017-05-28 16:04:00 UTCemga Hopla, das sollte natürlich nicht sein, da hab ich mich vertippt. Schau es mir an!
32017-05-28 16:22:42 UTCemga Sollte passen, Danke für den Hinweis
12017-05-28 10:34:32 UTCmueschel Moin,
habe hier an 11 Nodes den Key "sloped_curbs" gesehen - "sloped_curb" wäre richtig.

Gruß, Jan
22017-05-28 11:14:07 UTCThoschi Hi,
danke für den Hinweis. Habe aber jetzt auf die Schnelle nur 6 Nodes wiedergefunden (und geändert).
Gruß Thorsten
12017-05-28 10:22:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4868074917
The tag seems strange:
5653 = sv:Gora_Sad-Ishtrag
22017-05-28 17:05:30 UTCgosausee @mueschel:
thx 4 your info. i changed it!
12017-05-28 10:19:45 UTCmueschel Hi, something went wrong here: You didn't "remove unnecesary tags", but added 100 nodes with just a strange "@id" tag.
Could you fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-05-29 05:55:40 UTCmarianp_telenav Done! Thank's!
Regards, Marian
12017-05-26 09:02:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "barriere = all" on 24 ways - looks like a mistake. Did you mean "barrier = wall"?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-26 08:59:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
deine erste Version "bus_bay =left" ist die laut Wiki korrekte. Das Suffix :left soll nur verwendet werden um weitere Eigenschaften anzugeben. Und ist auch nur dann nötig, wenn bus_bay = both und die Eigenschaften auf beiden Seiten unterschiedlich sind.

Gruß, Jan
22017-05-26 10:28:49 UTCToniE Danke Jan,

dann werde ich mal in mich gehen und nachvollziehen, wo ich das bisher schon gemapped habe. Außer hier wohl nur am westlichen Teil der Truderinger Straße - glaub' ich.

Gruß
Toni
12017-05-24 18:44:32 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert - viele Gebäudedetails gelöscht.
22017-05-24 18:46:28 UTCmueschel Zur Information: Die meisten Gebäude am Campus waren mit vollständigem 3D-Mapping erfasst, siehe z.B. hier:
http://maps.osm2world.org/?zoom=18&lat=50.17364&lon=8.63088&layers=B0TTFF
Die meisten dieser Informationen wurden hier gelöscht.
12017-05-24 18:40:29 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert (Dach gelöscht)
12017-05-24 18:38:44 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert - doppelter POI node, Löschen von existierenden Objekten.
12017-05-24 18:36:52 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert (Löschen von Gebäudedetails)
12017-05-24 09:06:25 UTCmueschel Warum hast du hier alle Informationen zu den Gebäuden (Aussehen, Höhe etc.) gelöscht?
22017-05-24 09:12:12 UTCGoetheUniversitaet Sorry, wenn das so war, dann ohne Absicht. Kannst du es wieder zurücksetzen?
Sind noch neu, kennen uns noch nicht so gut aus. Wir ergänzen auch gleich unser Profil mit weiteren Infos.
32017-05-24 18:35:44 UTCmueschel Ich habe diese Löschung eines Gebäudeteils und Gebäudedetails revertiert.
12017-05-24 18:35:32 UTCmueschel Ich habe diese Löschung eines existierenden Gebäudeteils revertiert.
12017-05-24 11:30:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way got many strange tags - could you check this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494283585
altitudeMode = null
begin = null
building = yes
description = null
drawOrder = null
end = null
extrude = 0
icon = null
postal = yes
tessellate = -1
timestamp = nul...
12017-05-24 11:21:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw the tag "being=sourse" on many objects. Did you want to write "source = bing"?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-18 08:15:59 UTCJean-Marc Liotier Jan, you could safely assume so... Or was that pedagogical rhetoric ? Anyway, I made the corrections in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51224977
12017-05-23 20:39:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your edits you used the keys
faa:LFSN
faa:LSFN
FAA:LSFN
Could you use just one spelling?
Jan
22017-05-23 20:40:25 UTCmueschel Addendum: FAA:LFSN is used 52 times already
32017-05-24 13:35:32 UTCmicahcochran I'll try to do better spelling it. You are correct that it should be FAA:LFSN. This is "FAA's Landing Facility Site Number". I should probably remove it when there is some other kind of ID.
Thanks,
Micah
12017-05-23 17:26:29 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM!
I found tags like
Jumlah Lantai=1
Kedalaman Pondasi=1 meter
Material Bangunan=Balok Semen
Ventilasi=ada
jenis atap=genteng
jenis lantai=Keramik
on several objects.
This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software c...
12017-05-22 10:19:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 1880 objects with tags like "@id = way/5678989" This looks like a mistake - could you have a look and fix it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-22 19:41:02 UTCTheDutchMan13 Yeah i'll check it out now
32017-05-24 14:44:05 UTCTheDutchMan13 Reverted due to unknown errors
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48949502
42017-05-24 14:44:33 UTCTheDutchMan13 Should be fixed now. Took me a few days to figure it out.
12017-05-21 17:52:52 UTCmueschel Moin,
du hast dieser Straße zwei maxspeeds verpasst, kannst du das mal nachprüfen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177853840/history
22017-05-21 21:32:51 UTCPrince Kassad das war definitiv nicht beabsichtigt. Anscheinend hatte vorher jede Fahrtrichtung ein unterschiedliches maxspeed (30 hin und 50 zurück), woraus dann beim Zusammenfügen "maxspeed=30;50" wurde. Ohne vor Ort gewesen zu sein müsste man aber raten, ob jetzt 30 oder 50 gilt. Was d...
32017-05-21 21:36:42 UTCPrince Kassad Ich hab gerade gesehen dass es für die Ecke frische Mapillary-Bilder gibt. Demnach ist definitiv 30 richtig (ist eine Tempo-30-Zone), 50 ist Schmarrn. Hab das auch schon korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48871202
12017-05-21 16:48:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found four buildings with the tag "ODK =OMK". Looks like a mistake, could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-26 05:15:39 UTCmmahmud Hi, thanks for showing me this. Somehow it got pasted on the features. I will correct them.
:)
12017-05-20 15:39:59 UTCmueschel Diese Straße ist nicht komplett gesperrt, sondern z.Z. nur ein kleiner Abschnitt westlich des Waldes.
12017-05-20 13:45:25 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier in den letzten Jahren ja so einige Wanderrouten eingetragen. Bei den Längenangaben mit dem "distance" Tag hast du aber Kommazahlen benutzt anstelle des in OSM üblichen englischen Punktes als Dezimaltrenner. Würdest du da vielleicht bei Gelegenheit einen ...
22017-06-05 09:28:53 UTCHGSandhagen Hallo Jan,

ich habe die Distanzen der Wanderrouten "OSM-konform" geändert.
Gruß, Hans-Gerd
12017-05-20 13:18:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
ich finde hier einige Wege, bei denen du das "incline" Tag geändert hast, z.B. von "2%" auf den merkwürdigen Text "up,_down,_5%". Könntest du das bitte wieder korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan
12017-05-19 10:48:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you used these tags to describe the Symbol for this route?
background \tred_frame
foreground1 \tred_rectangle
foreground2 \twhite_rectangle

We do have the key "osmc:symbol" to describe such symbols.

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-19 08:54:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw that you are adding destination tags to roads. I would like to remind you that the order of the parts of a key is important, it should always be:
key[:subkey][:lanes][:forward|:backward]
e.g.
destination:colour:lanes:backward

I saw a few keys where this order is mixed.
Cheers, Jan
12017-05-19 08:46:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check this import of nodes? All of them have many foreign keys which should not appear in the OSM data base. The one common key (building=yes) should not be there, because these nodes are not the actual building, which are already in the database.
Jan

http://www.openstreetm...
12017-05-16 10:50:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
some of the ways have strange tags, can they be removed? All necessary information is contained in the relations you added as well.
E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492834831

Jan
22017-07-26 18:39:01 UTCSAnugroho Sorry, late response. Already fixed by changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49180151 Thank you.
12017-05-16 10:44:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? It has only foreign keys:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492361529

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-26 18:20:27 UTCSAnugroho Sorry, late respond. Fixed by changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50566679 Thank you.
12017-05-16 10:36:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of keys. On 35 nodes I found "water_tankt:housenumber" instead of "water_tank:housenumber" Could you have a look and correct these?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-16 10:35:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
I would like to point you to the "Date Namespace": This makes historical entries like yours much easier to read, e.g.
Instead of:
was:2:name \tБородинская улица
was:2:name:end_date \t1918
was:2:name:fi \tBorodinonkatu
was:2:name:ru \tБородинская ули...
12017-05-14 17:54:29 UTCPeilscheibe Hallo mueschel, gibt es irgendeinen besonderen Grund für die Entfernung einer zutreffenden Information? Wurde das Schild geändert?
22017-05-14 17:57:03 UTCmueschel Die Information war doppelt vorhanden. Ich habe nur eine der beiden Angaben "Rietheim 4.3 km;Terrassenfreibad 0.4 km" entfernt.
32017-05-14 20:52:04 UTCPeilscheibe Das war kein Duplikat, das war ein Hinweis auf einen Fehler am Schild. Genauer: was Du gelöscht hast, ist exakt der Text, der auf dem Schild steht (*:signposted). Ich habe das mal wiederhergestellt.
42017-05-14 20:59:30 UTCmueschel Dann schreib doch da bitte eine note="Schreibfehler 'Terasse' auch auf Schild vorhanden", das verstehen dann auch andere Mapper. Neu erfundene Tags, deren Wert eine (fast) Kopie eines anderen Tags sind, versteht niemand und verwirren nur.
12017-05-08 18:50:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
What did you try to add to the database? All nodes you added have some foreign tags which should not be here, and don't have any meaningful ones.
Jan
22017-05-14 14:14:45 UTCmueschel I just reverted these edits as they did not contain any valuable additional information to data already existing.
32017-05-14 20:43:07 UTCgeow Hi cstp, if you are intending to create a route for ski mountaineering (scialpinismo), you might use a route relation
with "type=route + route=piste + piste:type=skitour" see
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4663751 or
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5280864

Ciao
geow\...
12017-05-13 13:00:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the key "gateway = yes" on this node - did you mean "barrier = gate"?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4838972161

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-13 11:41:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found some ways with all foreign tags, and no usual OSM tags:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/p1l
Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan
22017-05-13 19:38:58 UTCRichard L Fixed my one and also another one I found. Thanks for notifying
12017-05-12 10:58:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the Korean key on this relation:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6939871/history
It's new and I don't really see where it comes from.
Jan
22017-05-12 21:06:15 UTCpyram Sorry, maybe a copy&paste-error (no idea).
Thanks for the error check.
Now I fixed the needless one-way-relation too (=> way).
12017-05-12 10:41:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "cossing_ref" 78 times. Correct would be "crossing_ref". Could you have a look and fix this? Cheers, Jan
12017-05-11 09:32:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some trees with strange tags like these:
529=zł
przy=odbiorze
197=162
Could you have a look and correct this? Here is a map with all these nodes:

http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(node%5B%22529%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22529%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22529%22%5D%3B)...
22017-05-11 14:46:29 UTCd3mol3k Thanks for paying attention - something got pasted (I do not know how) - corrected
12017-05-10 11:13:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
just a hint: You used the tag combination "building = yes" "wall = no". You can use "building = roof" instead.

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-11 10:12:51 UTCagab29 Hello Jan,

Unfortunately this building tag is automatically generated by french import cadastre tool.

May be could you suggest your idea to developer at https://trac.openstreetmap.fr/newticket

Best regards

André
12017-05-09 10:49:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way got rather strange tags, could you check and correct that?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34792962

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-09 11:02:07 UTCsebastic Please adjust the tags as you see fit.

The the tags from the outer way were simply moved to the relation as part of the old-style multipolygon fixing effort.

There is a lot of import data in these regions, that is for the local community to deal with.
32017-05-09 11:18:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
thanks for the reply. I think the situation is different for this way, have a look to the full history: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/34792962
It was natural=wood until a week ago, then all tags were deleted by someone else and you added some new tags. I don't see that this w...
42017-05-09 11:30:22 UTCsebastic There were a lot of duplicate node issues in this area. Those were fixed after the JOSM validator reported the issues before uploading the previously old-style multipolygons.
52017-05-09 17:25:00 UTCmueschel I guess natural=wood is right and the rest can be removed?
62017-05-09 18:50:27 UTCsebastic The tags seem to imply so, double check with satellite imagery.
72017-05-09 18:55:54 UTCmueschel Looks fine. I just changed it.
12017-05-09 10:39:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
In this edit, a few mistakes happened.
The tag "amenity=parking" should be put on the area only, but not on all of the nodes the area consists of.
Second, many objects contain many foreign keys which do not belong in the OSM database and should be removed; E.g.
col...
12017-05-08 19:54:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the name of this street? It only has a "nameol" and "old_name" tag.

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-08 19:52:57 UTCmueschel Moin,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127365799
note:motor_vehicle:backward \t= "Zubringerdienst gestattet"

Ist das nicht das, was OSM unter "destination" versteht? In DE entspricht das dem "Anlieger frei".

Gruß, Jan
12017-05-08 18:59:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags - e.g. you added several buildings with the tag "builing" instead of "building".

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-06 14:19:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
dieses Tor hat ein merkwürdiges Tag "max4:10". Kannst du da mal nachschauen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4827515404

Jan
22017-05-06 17:50:21 UTCCassini97 Salve Jan!

Ist doch frängggisch! ;-)

Geändert... jedenfalls, wenn ich die Sitzung gleich hochlade!

Dank und Gruß!
12017-05-06 14:18:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "mofa = n" on this bridge:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490496091 (and its other parts)
Is it 'mofa = no' or 'moped = no'?
Jan
22017-05-06 14:39:56 UTCCarto'Cité Thank for noticing. This has now been fixed to moped=no.
Antoine.
12017-05-06 13:44:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "NaPTANAreaCode" to all of these nodes. I guess this should be converted to "naptan:AtcoCode", as this is a tag used in many other places already.

Jan
12017-05-06 13:42:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many strange tags here, like these:
EntityHand=AEB
ExtendedEn=3 gros { FACING_3 PTE EXT } FACING_3-E01PTE 109710 38.1 0.0 5 { 0 0 0 0 }
Layer=GROS$
SubClasses=AcDbEntity:AcDbPolyline
What is the meaning of all this?
Also, indoor corridors should be tagged as ind...
22017-05-08 13:09:17 UTCMichi_ Dear Jan,

those tags descend from the shape files from which the map was created. For this reason, they will be removed as soon as possible.
The tag highway=footway is necessary to guarantee the beta navigation as Adrien Pavie suggested.

Cheers,

Michela
32017-06-03 09:10:20 UTCmmd Those shapefiles seem to originate from some AutoCAD files. How about the copyright status of those files? In any case, has this been discussed with the community beforehand? Are you aware of the following process? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import
42017-06-04 18:28:34 UTCMichi_ Dear mmd,

the shapefiles were originated from Quantum Gis software, which is open source.
Moreover the plans were officially provided from the building office of "Sapienza" University of Rome .

With my warmest regards,

Michela
52017-06-04 18:32:16 UTCmmd FYI: OSM Data Working Group (DWG) has already started reverting your imports as they don't adhere to OSM standards: see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49230231 as an example.
12017-05-06 13:39:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "name:tok" to many countries. Which language does 'tok' refer to? I can't find it in the list of ISO 639 language codes.
Jan
12017-05-06 13:36:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
this village consists of social facilities only? There are many ways overlapping each other and the objects have tags (like 'facility_t') which don't seem to belong in the OSM database. Could you have a look and correct these issues?
22017-05-06 20:38:48 UTCkmoses28 These tags are in the process of being cleaned up.
12017-05-06 11:48:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
bitte denke daran Knoten zu setzen wenn zwei Wege sich kreuzen, z.B. ein Fußweg der eine Straße überquert.
Habe gerade einige solcher Punkte in Michelstadt korrigiert.

Gruß, Jan
12017-05-06 11:32:00 UTCmueschel Vorsicht beim Korrigieren von diesen duplicate ways - in der Gegend von Würzburg ist das momentane Problem nicht mit ein paar lokalen Edits zu lösen, die machen es eher noch schlimmer weil Reverts nicht mehr möglich sind.
z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491622891

Gruß...
12017-05-06 11:29:06 UTCmueschel Bitte füge keine neuen Wege mehr hinzu die mit anderen Wegen überlappen. Hier in der Region ist ein riesiges Chaos entstanden, das ersteinmal beseitigt werden muss.
12017-04-08 11:40:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
what are all these tags you put on 250++ ways? They are new, not used anywhere else and don't seem to be documented.

escala=drenajes a 1:25000
estado_dre=5102
fecha_modi=08/04/2015
responsabl=Alejandra Gómez Sarmiento
ruleid=1
vigencia=0

Thanks, Jan
22017-05-04 15:31:05 UTCopengislab I tell you because those attributes are that way.
This disaster happened on April 1, 2017.
In Mocoa there was very little information, the task was activated in tasking manager of OSM Colombia, https://tareas.openstreetmap.co/project/50

In two days we managed to map the necessary and the result...
32017-05-04 15:59:10 UTCmueschel I know that this is very useful information and we should try to have this information in the database.
You write:
"igac information was used, which is available and can be used under conditions , And one of them is not to lose the original attributes."

I'm sorry to say, but this mean...
12017-05-03 08:45:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this tagging? Is Frailes the name?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171545533

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-03 14:43:25 UTCFederico Explorador Hi Jan,

I think it is "Fraile", according to IGAC maps, but I have no field evidence for the rivers name.
32017-05-04 10:24:11 UTCmueschel Alright. I'll change the tag "Fraile = Fraile" to "name = Fraile".
12017-05-03 09:30:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this tagging? The maxspeed tag is strange:
openstreetmap.org/way/490097570

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-03 09:37:08 UTChanoj Thanks, I know about tag fail, but I dont found it. Now is correct.
12017-05-03 08:58:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier sind einige Wege mit dem Tag "30=177" entstanden. Schaust du da nochmal nach?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35780993#map=17/47.84284/16.68863

Gruss, Jan
22017-05-04 05:58:24 UTCTBKMrt Hätte maxspeed=30 werden sollen. Danke für den Hinweis - ist korrigiert in #48383540.
12017-05-02 11:11:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "building_material" to 127 objects. The usual spelling is "building:material" with ':' instead of '_'. Could you have a look and correct this?
Cheers, Jan
12017-05-02 11:08:58 UTCmueschel Moin,
was heißt denn "Alfie=Allen" an 30 Bäumen hier?
Gruß, Jan
22017-05-02 16:22:05 UTCq_un_go Moin,

das frage ich mich auch. Keine Ahnung wie mir das passiert ist. Nun ja, nun ist der Alf wieder ein Alien und kein Allen.
Gruß
Winfried
12017-04-30 17:20:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du mal nach dieser Straße schauen? Du hast ihr "maxspeed=50;30" verpasst, aber nur ein Wert kann stimmen.
http://osm.org/way/29341035

Gruß, Jan
22017-05-01 19:06:58 UTCSeparis Oh, danke für den Hinweis. Weiß auch nicht, wie die 30 da reingerutscht ist. Hab ich korrigiert. Gruß Werner
12017-04-30 16:47:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
meintest du hier eventuell "springy"? "swingy" ist mir unbekannt.
http://osm.org/node/4738337035

Gruß, Jan
12017-04-25 15:09:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you have a look to 40 trees added in this changeset? They have the tag "crown_type:=I"
Note the ':' in the key which shouldn't be there. Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan
22017-04-27 08:44:19 UTCtaxi301 Hi .
This is a proposal how to improve the tagging of trees (natural=tree) for the use in 3D-applications.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Marek_kleciak/Tree_table

I was curious if it would show up in 3D, I would improve on type = palm
Sorry for my English but only by translator. Regar...
32017-04-27 17:18:48 UTCmueschel Your tagging is fine. Just a spelling mistake:
You write: "crown_type:"
But it should be: "crown_type"
12017-04-26 09:49:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging changes? E.g. 'ref:-2001-02-12' is not a valid key. There should be a double '--' when using dates according to the wiki.

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-27 08:35:01 UTCfgouget As far as I can tell the wiki says to use " key:-date = value", and that the use of '--' is outdated: "An older version of ISO 8601 used the double hyphen to replace omitted years in partial dates".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Date_nam...
32017-04-27 17:16:24 UTCmueschel Indeed, it does. Since 7 days at least.
There is an extensive discussion on the talk page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Date_specification
12017-04-25 12:56:34 UTClenny32 The addr:* node already exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1522397032
There is no need to create another one at the restaurant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema
22017-04-25 17:51:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
I'm not aware of any tool that makes use of these tags. For most applications the tagged address was unusable. The existence of another node close by with address information is not sufficient to find the actual address of this POI.
The only case how addresses of another object can be used on...
32017-04-26 06:30:46 UTCdgitto It is the tool that have to follow (use) a schema. Not the tag schema follow some tools.
Is normal that no tools exist, when a schema starts to be used.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema
42017-04-26 08:07:33 UTCmueschel Until this schema has been adopted, we have to stick to the old scheme, otherwise we lose information. I.e. both tags have to exist in parallel.
But, I really doubt that any tool will use this tagging, based on a 4 year old draft without even an RFC.
52017-04-26 09:20:24 UTClenny32 It seems to me that an address should be unique (it exists with or without POI) it is an object in its own right. Many POIs have no address.
If it is the same node, when the POI disappears or moves, the address may be deleted or moved with the poi by the inattentive contributor. Contact information...
12017-04-25 15:08:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
this changeset created 9 relations with no common tags - could you check this and replace the foreign keys with common ones if necesseary?

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-24 21:36:00 UTCAthalis Hi, beim way 407255155 wolltest du wahrscheinlich wie bei den anderen Wegen das Komma durch einen Punkt austauschen? Sieht aus als ob der Punkt verloren gegangen ist ;)
22017-04-24 21:47:00 UTCmueschel Ja, der Verdacht liegt nahe ;-) Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe es korrigiert.
12017-04-24 10:47:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, it has a strange tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4806907046
80-84= 41-55

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-24 10:42:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some strange tags to objects, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488399710
"Market = Sub Post Office" and several more. What is the meaning of this?

Please have a look to the wiki to find out how common features like shops have to be tagged to be shown on the map.
...
12017-04-22 15:17:14 UTCdamjang Ok, but so the wiki must be corrected:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone :-)
22017-04-23 13:32:49 UTCmueschel You're right. Looks like somebody wants to distinguish between phone service in Italian language (:it) and an phone number to be reached from Italy only (:IT). Kind of makes sense but is hard to remember.
32017-04-23 21:37:35 UTCdamjang Bacause this is a phone number free only usable from Italy, if for you is ok, I will rechange to upper chars (phone:IT)
42017-04-24 09:36:57 UTCmueschel Yes, sure. It was my mistake.
12017-04-23 10:47:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
schaust du bei diesem Weg nochmal nach den beiden lanes* Tags? Da ist etwas schiefgegangen.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297874842

Gruss, Jan
12017-04-22 11:15:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
the correct tag "addr:housenumber" was changed to the wrong tag "adr:housenumber" on 18.000 buildings in this city. Some of these changes where done in this changeset.
Could you fix that - or let me know if you need help with it.

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-21 08:47:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du nochmal nach dem Tagging schauen '_vertical' ist ein ungewöhnlicher Key.

Gruß, Jan
12017-04-20 19:00:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the "housename" on this building?
http://osm.org/way/332283894

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-28 06:38:32 UTCtanjeff Hello Jan,
the buildings at Layenhof have 4-digit numbers which I mapped as addr:housenumber. The building you mentioned seems to have two numbers (63 and 5872), but I don't remember the details. I will check that when I'm there again (might take 2 weeks). I will add a further comment then.
Regard...
32017-06-11 12:17:45 UTCtanjeff Hello Jan,
Sorry for the delay, I was quite busy. As I wrote, the houses in the area have 4-digit numbers. For most buildings, I mapped this number as addr:housenumber.

But the building in question has two numbers: 64 (not 63) and 5872. I guess that 64 is the number to use when sending letters, ...
12017-04-20 18:56:29 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du nochmal über diese 3 Relationen schauen? Eine ist nicht geschlossen, alle drei haben keinen Namen

http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159115
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159792
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159745

Gruß,...
12017-04-20 10:40:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
you tagged some buildings with "building:wall" and "building:roof". I replaced these tags with the common building:material and roof:material keys. These are in use in many places and are defined in the wiki.

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-20 13:51:21 UTChbrown14 Hi - Thanks! I feel so silly about this tagging mistake. I'll be sure to fix the remaining tag mistakes in this area.
Sudie
12017-04-15 16:38:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
it's a bit strange that this railway in Greece uses German signaling. Could you check that? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4790883029
Jan
22017-04-19 03:44:15 UTCLowe253 Hi Jan,
Greek Railways do actually uses german signalling although this might sound bizarre to people. This is not a full replication of ESO, but a lite version (no train protection system, no electrified rails until late 90's and so on). If you try wikipedia you can check also the historical reas...
32017-04-19 09:04:14 UTCmueschel Alright, I wasn't aware of this. I stumbled across it because of a spelling mistake: railway:signal:main:f should be railway:signal:main:form, I think.
42017-04-19 10:42:03 UTCLowe253 You are right, my bad...
12017-04-18 10:57:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
these POIs have some foreign tags that could (and should) be converted to usual OSM tags, e.g.
ACCESSIBLE
ADDRESS
ADDRESS_FR
NAME_FR
NOTES

Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan
22017-04-18 10:59:23 UTCRps333 I will have a look. thanks
12017-04-18 10:34:42 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du erfindest hier (mal wieder) Unmengen an neuen Tags. Bitte informiere dich über gängige Tags. In der jetztigen Form sind diese Informationen absolut nutzlos.
Beispiele:
bicycle situation
bicycle designating Sign\t
Bicycle path color to walkway
cycle end
cycle path quality\t...
12017-04-17 11:14:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this building, it has many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486855572

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-17 21:19:55 UTCEnigmaQuip Fixed, sorry about that
12017-04-13 08:36:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some nodes with tags light "light_source". Street lamps usually are tagged with "highway=street_lamp", which should be there additional to your tags. Would you mind adding it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-13 14:19:51 UTCMRPockets I specifically chose not to tag them as "highway=street_lamp" since they are not street lamps. They illuminate primarily the grass and sidewalks, not streets. I could not find any better tags for non-street lamps than simply "light_source=lantern." If I am misunderstanding the us...
32017-04-16 19:59:08 UTCmueschel I don't think we do distinguish between street lamps and path lamps. Until we come up with a distinction, I opt for tagging them with the common tag to make them visible on existing maps.
12017-04-16 16:32:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong with this import. The nodes are spread over the ocean...
Also, "Adresse" and "Nom" are no common tags in OSM and should be properly tagged.

Jan
22017-04-19 21:52:39 UTCSomeoneElse @mueschel no reply here so I've reverted these additions and sent the user a message that they have to read before continuing editing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1320 .
Best Regards,
Andy
12017-04-16 16:26:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put some urls to maps in the tags of these objects. I assume you used these as the source of your edits? To you have an permit to use these maps or are these licensed under a license compatible to ODbL?

Jan
22017-04-17 10:55:44 UTCemj Hej, nej detta är ett resultat av cykelturer sedan den snöfria nyårsaftonen till nu. Öppettiderna är från hemsidan dock, jag hade bara fotat dessa på tre av ställena.

Jag gör ganska många kartläggningar som jag inte lägger upp men n&...
32017-04-17 10:57:17 UTCemj English: Yes I've a ODBL + Contributors Term Compatible source for the edit. I'm sorry I was trollnig about the import.
12017-04-15 14:51:00 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier das highway-Tag entfernt, aber es laufen noch einige Wanderrouten über diesen Weg. Wie sieht das vor Ort wirklich aus?
http://osm.org/way/23325729

Gruß, Jan
22017-04-16 16:51:05 UTCmaction Hallo Jan,
nachdem die Neugestaltung der Rheinwiesen und der Uferpromenade gestartet war, hatte ich das Attribut highway der betroffenen Straßen und Wege entsprechend dem damaligen (4/2016) Zustand mit dem Lifecycle-Prefix demolished versehen. Heute sind die neuen und teils alten Straße...
12017-04-14 11:09:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added more than 6000 buildings with a misspelled house number tag: "adr:housenumber" instead of "addr:housenumber". Could you have a look and fix that? Let me know if you need help.

Jan
12017-04-12 11:29:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are six nodes like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4784899723
They don't have any common tag. Could you have a look?

Jan
22017-04-12 11:48:37 UTCzerpou Hi Jan,

I have integrated these points with her substations

Have a good day,

Albin
12017-04-12 10:36:21 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check the tagging of these 3 rivers?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485498407
The tag "Barranco del Pico = Rio Nuerna" looks a bit strange.
Jan
22017-04-12 11:44:39 UTCdalop Thanks for the advise, It was my mistake! I just fixed that now
12017-04-12 08:51:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 80 buildings with many foreign tags like the ones shown below.
I don't think they belong into the OSM database - can they be removed?

Cheers, Jan

ADAT=2013-05-08 09:04
ANDAMAL_1=130
ANDAMAL_10=0
ANDAMAL_1T=Bostad; Småhus friliggande
ANDAMAL_2=0
ANDAMAL_3=0
ANDAMAL_4=0...
22017-04-12 11:00:13 UTCDalkvist He was doing some incompatible sourced imports, they have stopped now and I have emailed dwg to redact the changesets.
12017-04-11 19:52:02 UTCBob Moin!
Eine no_entry restriction (hier: Deine Änderung an der Relation 6848355) kann mehrere from-Mitglieder haben, so steht es im Wiki. Das gelöschte Mitglied habe ich daher wiederhergestellt. Das aufgestellte Zeichen 267 betrifft beide Richtungen.
22017-04-11 20:02:08 UTCmueschel Auf den meisten Wiki-Seiten steht "exakt 1", auch auf der Deutschen. Nur die tschechische und englische Seite erlauben mehrere für no_entry.

Ich würde die Relation vielleicht lieber verdoppeln, je eine für jeden from-Weg. Wer weiß, welcher Router damit Probleme hat.
32017-04-12 10:42:00 UTCPeilscheibe @mueschel: Die no_entry und no_exit-restrictions wurden ja genau zu dem Zweck so definiert, das man eben nicht mehrere Relationen braucht, wo eine genügt. Wenn ein Router nicht mit mehreren from- bzw. to-ways klarkommt, darf er gerne dazulernen.
42017-04-12 15:54:14 UTCBob Moin zusammen!
Die deutsche Wiki-Seite ist dazu leider wohl veraltet. Sie kennt die no_entry und no_exit restriction (noch) nicht. Die kamen erst 2011 hinzu und die Übersetzung hat noch keiner angepackt.
12017-04-09 10:49:25 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier eine Tags neu erfunden, die sonst nirgends verwendet werden:

parking:condition:cost
parking:condition:duration
parking:condition:note
parking:condition:user\tparking:condition:vehicle

Bitte schau mal im Wiki nach den üblichen Tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w...
22017-04-10 07:01:55 UTCFrank Bielig Die Tags gibt es teilweise schon. Leider sind viele Tags mit entweder :both:, :right: oder :left: versehen. Hier trifft aber keine dieser Varianten zu.
32017-04-10 09:32:25 UTCmueschel "cost" -> "fee"
"interval" -> "time_interval"
"duration" -> "maxstay"
"vehicle" und "user" gibt es nicht, das muss über condition angegeben werden wenn es Einschränkungen gibt.

Die Tags gehö...
42017-04-10 10:36:40 UTCFrank Bielig "Die Tags gehören eigentlich an die Straße selbst, ..."
Das ist der eigentliche Diskussionspunkt. Bei der Wahl der Tagnamen sind wir leidenschaftslos, könnte auch immer leicht angepasst werden. Schwieriger ist der Punkt, wie die Geometrien aufgenommen werden. Wir haben u...
52017-04-10 11:32:25 UTCRalf Bielig "Die Tags gehören eigentlich an die Straße ..."

Das sehe ich dann problematisch, wenn:
* die Parkstreifen beider Straßenseiten physisch weit auseinander liegen, z.B. bei mehrspurigen Straßen.
* die Parkkonditionen sich alle paar Meter ändern oder auf beiden...
62017-04-10 11:48:00 UTCmueschel Ja, ideal ist das vorhandene Schema nicht. Ich denke, sowas sollte mal in größerer Runde diskutiert werden, z.B. im Forum mit ein paar gut ausgewählten Beispielen.
Das beste Tagging nützt ja am Ende nichts, wenn es die Auswerter nicht umsetzen wollen oder können.
72017-04-10 14:23:15 UTCNakaner Hallo Frank,

wer ist denn "wir"? Falls ihr organisiert oder mit kommerziellen Absichten in OSM editiert, solltet ihr das samt der Motivation und eurer Pläne offenlegen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
82017-04-10 15:53:52 UTCFrank Bielig Hallo Michael,
"uns", Kollegen mit großem Interesse an digitalen Karten und langjährige Nutzer von OSM, möchten nur helfen, ein weiteres Feature bei OSM zu etablieren, welches ein Grundübel des heutigen Straßenverkehrs in Metropolen beseitigen hilft: Parkpl&au...
12017-04-10 11:00:18 UTCmueschel Servus,
ich finde hier mehrmals "lity = sign" - sieht irgendwie nach Tippfehler aus.
Gruß, Jan
22017-04-10 15:27:12 UTCPeilscheibe Autsch. Vermutlich eine Teamleistung von Autovervollständigung und schnellem Finger ;-) Danke für's finden, ist repariert.
12017-04-04 14:34:50 UTCmueschel Could you please point me to the discussion page of this mechanical edit?
22017-04-04 19:14:35 UTCti-lo It's not mechanical, but manual
32017-04-04 19:29:41 UTCmueschel Even then, this has to be discussed beforehand (as you were told by the DWG this afternoon).
- > 600 objects edited worldwide within a single day
- in the ~ 10 cases I checked, some information was lost (e.g. used bikes and new bikes sales replaced by a single 'sales' tag)
- there are tags wit...
42017-04-09 14:00:19 UTCti-lo Sorry for the late answer, didn't get the notification somehow.
- Who is DWG ?
- Could you send me some examples for the "lost information" issue ?
- spelling mistakes shouldn't have happened as I mostly use copy & paste for the tags, but if you find errors, I'll correct them
- I c...
52017-04-09 15:33:33 UTCmueschel DWG = Data Working Group, the guys who gave you this block: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1293

lost information - this is very hard to find, given that you retagged thousands of stores and you have to look in the history of these nodes
"removing an established tagging scheme com...
62017-04-09 16:55:16 UTCti-lo Regarding DWG : Sent this message with explanations of my actions and was then unblocked immediately : woodpeck 4. April 2017 15:45
"well documented" is really an euphemism for the status before.
- (motorcycle) "clöthes" was not defined
- for "rental" there we...
72017-04-10 11:54:52 UTCDaveF Although this entity was tagged indirectly in the first place (it should be shop not amenity), you made it worse by removing any primary tag & substituting with a sole sub-tag. Sub-tags are 'adjective' tags which help describe the details of the objects.
82017-04-10 17:31:06 UTCti-lo That's right, I corrected it.
Pretty strange as I was sure I checked the entry when I answered ("Sorry for the late answer"). I once had an effect that a history entry disappeared (I edited an entry, later someone else edited it again, my edits were still there, but the history entry miss...
92017-04-10 17:41:43 UTCti-lo mea culpa, I checked the others, seems I didn't pay attention to this, correcting them now
12016-12-04 12:26:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "atl_name" on 40 nodes - this should be "alt_name". Would you mind correcting these?
Jan
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ksp
22017-04-02 15:23:52 UTCmueschel Hi (again),
this upload also contains several hundred nodes without any tags. Can these be deleted?
Jan
32017-04-02 16:44:56 UTCrashaurl Hello,
You do not need to delete them, these are blanks. Thank you
42017-04-08 14:44:38 UTCmueschel What do you mean by 'blanks'? Single nodes without tags are just useless.
52017-04-10 12:18:17 UTCrashaurl Billet, in order to then add tags.
I understandably wrote?
62017-04-10 12:18:51 UTCrashaurl i use gogle translate))
12017-04-08 11:43:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these buildings have a strange key that is not used in any other place:
tipo_const=NO CONVENCIONAL
What does it mean?
Btw, this looks a lot like an import, could you point me to the discussion and documentation of it on the mailing list or wiki?

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-04 15:40:48 UTCopengislab I tell you because those attributes are that way.
This disaster happened on April 1, 2017.
In Mocoa there was very little information, the task was activated in tasking manager of OSM Colombia, https://tareas.openstreetmap.co/project/50

In two days we managed to map the necessary and the result...
32017-05-11 20:15:48 UTCsmaprs Also almost all buildings have the same tags:
"building:levels=7".
But in fact, as can be seen in images, most buildings are houses of only 1 level (some few have 2 or 3).
What happened?
Was those same tags accidentallly copied/applied to all buildings?
12017-04-07 19:48:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
'abandoned' is written 'abandoned' and not 'abandonded'. Could you have a look and correct this on >60 objects?
Cheers, Jan
22017-04-08 16:21:45 UTCChristian Madsen Thank you for the feedback. Looks like JOSM has replicated a misspelling instead of the correct phrase. I will change it first opportunity I get.
32017-04-13 17:46:24 UTCChristian Madsen There, I think got them all now. Please comment if there are anyone left.
12017-04-06 15:46:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added more than 120 buildings with the misspelled key 'buiilding'. Could you have a look and correct this?
Jan
12017-04-04 17:18:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of these tags?

numero_pis=1
numero_sot=0
tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL
tipo_domin=PRIVADO

Also, it looks like the images you use are misaligned, many of the buildings are intersecting the road (which seems to be in the right place according to GPS traces)
Could...
22017-04-04 23:15:20 UTCNicoVargas Yeah, it was caused by a direct import of an area not covered by the IGAC image we were using.

numero_pis=1 (# of floors )
numero_sot=0 (# of basement)
tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL (i think is a building with strong materials as cement, an so)
tipo_domin=PRIVADO (private)

This issue maybe remai...
32017-04-05 17:07:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
I can change the numero_pis to building:levels and building:levels:underground. I don't think we have an equivalent for the other two, should I delete them?
42017-04-05 17:34:30 UTCNicoVargas Yes please, replace it and delet it :) Many thanks
52017-04-05 18:48:45 UTCmueschel Ok, did in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47486023
12017-04-04 15:48:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377910114

The key 'ch]' looks like a mistake.
Jan
22017-04-04 19:47:24 UTCdudone Hi Jan

Many thanks for spotting this. I have removed the tag. There was also a highway=track tag missing for the way above this which I have now added.

Regards
Dudley
12017-04-02 15:46:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the name tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4766343316

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-03 07:01:24 UTCChristian Madsen Ops, my bad. Thanks for the feedback.
12017-04-02 15:38:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this building?
"Arme = Klarenstraat"
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70840140

Jan
22017-04-02 17:18:00 UTCJakka "Arme = Klarenstraat" deleted
12017-04-02 15:33:07 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du benutzt hier 70x den key "generator:mode" - das sollte eigentlich "generator:method" heißen. Korrigierst du das noch?

Grüße, Jan
12017-04-02 14:46:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
in this area you created a lot (~ 1000) of nodes without any tag which don't belong to a way or relation. I guess this was a mistake and they can be deleted?
E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/4311927621

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-02 14:42:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong on some of the buildings you added: The ways are not correct, containing some nodes more than once. Could you have a look and correct these? Here is a map with error markers (Keepright):
osm.mueschelsoft.de/keepright/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=48.62793&lon=38.93588...
12017-04-02 14:17:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
I noticed some issues with this (huge) import of ~20000 trees.
- The nodes have several tags which are not defined in the wiki, such as
age,constituency, form, plot_number, site_name, usrn, ward
- I didn't find a discussion on this import. Was it announced on the mailing list?
- the 'height...
22017-04-27 14:01:51 UTCbrianboru This is now documented for discussion at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Birmingham_City_Council_trees_data following talk-gb converstions and is paused until issues are resolved
12017-04-01 17:17:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:17:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
22017-04-02 11:02:16 UTCjohanespeter9 thank you so much, i am still clearing data let me rectify right now
12017-04-01 17:17:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:17:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:16:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:16:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:14:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like this import went wrong - there is a huge amount of foreign tags on the ways. Could you clean this up?
Jan
12017-04-01 12:38:19 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was ist denn das hier: http://osm.org/way/331073395
Eine Fußgängerbrücke? Dann sollte noch "highway=path" ergänzt werden.
Gruß, Jan
12017-04-01 12:17:44 UTCmueschel Wurde die von dir geänderte Kreuzung hier umgebaut? Im Augenblick stimmen die Wege nämlich nicht mehr mit Bing überein.
Gruß, Jan
12017-03-30 13:27:08 UTCmueschel Hallo,
fast 60 der Gebäude haben das Tag "roof:sharp" anstelle von "roof:shape". Kannst du das noch korrigieren?
Griß, Jan
22017-03-30 14:26:32 UTCanbr Ja, den Tippfehler habe ich korrigiert ...
12017-03-30 13:26:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 50 points with keys POINT_X and POINT_Y. I guess this was a mistake and should be deleted?
Jan
12017-03-26 15:00:57 UTCmueschel Hallo Micha,
kannst du rund um diesen Weg noch nach den Bus-Relationen und dem Spurtagging schauen? Das stimmt jetzt alles nicht mehr.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42937214

Gruß, Jan
12017-03-26 12:53:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 6 ways (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337771983) with the key "ad]" - could you check and correct this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-26 14:32:39 UTCTomas Straupis Fixed. Thank you for noticing.
12017-03-25 12:24:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
here are 749 buildings with the tag "_building_1_=yes". Could you fix that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-03-25 11:46:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of three ways, including this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482320633
other_tags = "surface"=>"unpaved","tracktype"=>"2"
specifiche =5
trekking =1

Jan
12017-03-24 08:41:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
du nutzt hier das Tag 'night_only'. Nachtbusse werden normalerweise mit "by_night = only" getagged. Vielleicht willst du das noch anpassen?
Gruß, Jan
22017-03-26 20:56:50 UTCFlutus Ich dachte schon dass es eines geben müsste, hab aber keins gefunden.
Ist geändert.
12017-03-22 11:38:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used these tags:
traffic_signals:ground = yes
traffic_signals:light = yes
They are not in use in any other place yet - what is their meaning?
Jan
22017-03-22 12:05:19 UTCmweper Hi @mueschel.
This news talks about the tags (invented by now) that I put, since I did not know if there was a tag for that.
-
http://rosarionoticias.gob.ar/page/noticias/id/77308/title/Se-puso-en-funcionamiento-el-primer-semáforo-peatonal-de-piso-del-país
--
I put both for the do...
32017-03-22 12:22:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
alright. I would go with the 'floor_light' version. Please add an entry to the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
Recently, a similar installation was made in the Netherlands.
42017-03-26 20:06:58 UTCmweper Is it okay like this?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#How_to_add_a_floor_light_for_pedestrians.3F
12017-03-22 11:29:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your changesets I found a huge set of wrong tags, like these:
High way = Footpath
Water ways = intermediate
farm land \t= farm

Please have a look to the wiki how paths, rivers and buildings are tagged and use only these tags. Everything else is useless, because none of our software ca...
12017-03-21 11:54:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag 'addr:contact = yes' on many POIs. This is a new tag and not defined anywhere - what does it mean?
Jan
Jan
22017-03-21 12:39:15 UTCTomas Straupis It is a temporary tag to mark duplicate addresses until contact:* scheme is approved or at least we (Lithuanian mapping community) come to agreement that support of contact:* is good enough. For the time being f.e. iD editor does not support contact:*
We need this addr:contact info for QA and later...
12017-03-21 11:05:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. in your edits you used tags like '2nd floor occupant', 'other occupants' and several similar ones. These are not defined in the wiki and therefore are rather useless because none of our software can understand it. Please have a look to the wiki how POI like offices and shops hav...
12017-03-20 13:32:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
Could you check the spelling of tags? I found many 'buiding:levels' with a missing 'l'.

Jan
22017-03-21 03:59:09 UTCJessAk71 Oops so sorry my mistake on the missing letter I will double check and fix all them next week. Thanks for letting me know.
12017-03-20 09:38:58 UTCmueschel Partially reverted. Reason: features do not exist.
12017-03-20 09:37:30 UTCmueschel I reverted this changeset. Reason: This is a stream, not a man_made=breakwater
12017-03-20 09:36:26 UTCmueschel I reverted this changeset. Reason: This is not a park.
12017-03-19 15:12:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you have a look to the spelling of tags? E.g. I found
'electrifie' which should be 'electrified'
name_fa -> name:fa
full_name_ -> full_name
and few more. I corrected some of them but I don't know if I catched all.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-19 15:03:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please make sure you use only keys which are described in the Wiki. If you use other keys (like ones in Russian), no software can understand it and e.g. display it on a map.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-20 08:35:28 UTCopeihatebot А смещение для спутниковых снимков кто будет устанавливать?
32017-03-20 09:19:20 UTCandygol Я відмінив цей набір змін (див. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47006199)

This changeset was reverted by me (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47006199)
42017-03-20 09:34:47 UTCandygol Шановний Виик
Зважаючи на факт, що це ваша перша спроба участі в ОСМ, пропоную вам ознайомитись з деякими статями у Вікі проекту, які допоможуть вам зробити ваші зм...
12017-03-19 14:59:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
did you consider using the 'destination_sign' tagging for these signs?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign

This makes using the data much simpler like on this sign:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinationsign/example/#node=3908107513
22017-03-19 20:58:22 UTCCarlo Folini Hi,
no...but I definitely have to take a look into it! It seems very interesting
12017-03-19 14:50:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4741782702

hig=yes looks like a mistake

Jan
12017-03-19 14:44:48 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier bei einigen Tags ein '-' vorangestellt um sie zu 'deaktivieren'. Normalerweise benutzt man dafür einen der lifecycle prefixes, wie hier beschrieben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Wahrscheinlich passt 'disused:' hier.
Gruß, Jan
22017-03-19 15:41:39 UTCProtoxenus Ja, meine Intention war, das das (wahrscheinlich defekte) Molenfeuer nicht gerendert wird. Ich gehe davon aus, das es zu Saisonbeginn wieder in Betrieb geht.
Ich hatte auch erst überlegt, das anders kenntlich zu machen, aber ich fand nichts passendes. "Disused" ist nach meinem Sprach...
12017-03-17 12:09:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
this area doesn't have any valid tag. Could you check this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480839466

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-17 14:38:12 UTCjohanemilsson I placed the leisure tag in a relation. I should probably just remove the other tags as they are not really necessary.
32017-03-18 12:49:02 UTCmueschel The relation is fine, but those tags should be deleted if they are not needed. Maybe you want to keep one tag with an ID to be able to match this object again with your external data source.
Jan
12017-03-18 12:46:47 UTCmueschel Hi, you used the new key 'name:Zh_py' on 59 ways. the common version is 'name:zh_py', used 900 times already. Would you mind changing this?

Cheers, Jan
12016-10-30 12:57:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
5500 nodes have a misspelled tag "addrpostcode".
Btw, are you sure that the license of your source allows use for OSM? CC BY and ODbL are not compatible!

Jan
22016-10-30 13:46:15 UTCdan980-import Hi, we got this authorization letter: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/7/77/Autorizzazione_sardegna_openstreetmap.pdf
32016-10-30 13:50:19 UTCmueschel Alright, maybe you can add a remark on the wiki page?
42016-10-30 13:51:46 UTCdan980-import yes, I'm gonna update it as soon as possible
52016-10-30 14:01:25 UTCsabas88 CC-BY-SA isn't compatible, CC-BY is (provided we add a proper attribution on the changeset)
62017-03-17 21:38:03 UTCmueschel cc-by is not compatible. See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
(Doesn't affect this import, because of the explicit authorization)
12017-03-17 15:12:06 UTCToniE Danke, wieder ein typo von mir?
22017-03-17 19:29:53 UTCmueschel Aus "surfarce" habe ich "surface" gemacht - passiert nun mal beim Tippen.
12017-03-17 12:11:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4303618075

The tag ref`... = grid_bin doesn't look right.

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-17 09:42:56 UTCbrianboru Finger trouble! Thanks - corrected
12017-03-17 11:53:09 UTCmueschel Hi, the trees you add have a strange tag: "2016 = 298". I corrected some yesterday, but there are more you added today. I guess it should be "ref = 2016.298". Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-03-16 11:37:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480408120
The tag is wrong - and I don't know how to correct it. Looks like 'landuse = forest', but I can't see a forest here, just few individual trees.

Jan
12017-03-16 11:17:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added areas with strange tags that are not defined anywhere, like these:
area \tyes
area6 \tsubarea6
name \tsubarea6

What did you try to tag here? Some type of boundary? Please check the wiki on how to tag them properly, in the current state this data can not be interpreted by any sta...
22017-03-20 19:11:49 UTCHausemer Problem fixed!
12017-03-15 16:58:16 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check the tagging of some of the buildings, e.g.

buildingxx:floor should be floor:material
building:walls should be building:material
building:roof should be roof:material

Those tags are described in the wiki, please check the other tags as well.

Jan
12017-03-15 16:15:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 59 objects with the key 'bulding'. Would you mind fixing this? 'building'

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-14 11:51:58 UTCmueschel Do these streets really have the German name as part of their official name? If not, please use name:de for the German name.
Jan
12017-03-14 11:34:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the keys "vertical height", "vertical_height", "vertical_rise" to map the height difference of aerialways. These tags are not used in any other place. Typically, start and end node of the aerialway are tagged with 'ele' to mark their respective height.
\...
22017-03-14 18:05:15 UTCIrakli Ika Ok I will use ele insted, thank you.
12017-03-14 11:29:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
den Key 'wheelchair:approachable' gibt es bis jetzt noch nicht. Ich würde da einfach "wheelchair = yes" setzen, und wenn es noch eine Einschränkung gibt mit "wheelchair:description" arbeiten.

Gruß, Jan
22017-03-14 12:20:41 UTCPeilscheibe Hallo,
klar gibt's den, hier zum Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4732885191 ;-)
wheelchair=yes beschreibt die Benutzbarkeit eines Objekts mit dem Rollstuhl selbst, z. B. als Attribut an einem Fußgängerüberweg oder einer Toilette.
Nähmen wir als Beispiel nun mal d...
32017-04-23 06:35:24 UTCJPaulW Hey,
in dem Changeset sind ein paar Änderungen von track->path und track->service die ich absolut nicht nachvollziehen kann. Könntest du mal erklären was du gegen track an den Stellen hattest?
Viele Grüße
42017-04-23 08:36:21 UTCPeilscheibe Hallo JPaulW,

klar, gerne.
Zunächst haben wir in der Systematik in OSM eine Unterscheidung in Wirtschaftswege für land- bzw. forstwirtschaftlichen Verkehr (track - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack), die Widmung ist regelmäßig durch Beschilderung erk...
12017-03-14 11:17:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag 'with' on 29 ways. It should be spelled 'width' - could you have a look and fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-03-17 15:22:57 UTCGuyVV Hi,
Bedankt voor het opmerken.
Hopelijk heb ik ze nu allemaal verbeterd.
Grt,
Guy
12017-03-13 21:28:43 UTCmueschel Hallo,
"fee:no = yes" - das Tag gibt es nicht. Entweder fee=yes oder fee=no, was stimmt?
Gruss, Jan
22017-03-13 22:02:47 UTCChemist72 Hast Recht, Jan. Sorry & danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit. Ich hatte es velwechsert mit payment:none=yes. Ist korrigiert. Es kostet nichts. Ist eh noch im Bau.
12017-03-13 21:23:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
found 3 ways with all strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480097548
Could you check & correct this?

Jan
22017-03-13 21:54:00 UTCEnigmaQuip Fixed, sorry about that
12017-03-13 21:21:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
schau dir mal das Tagging von diesem Way an, da ist was schiefgelaufen:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47435488

Gruss, Jan
22017-03-13 22:03:27 UTCbielebog Auha, das gehört _da_ nicht rein. Das war ein Cut'n Paste-Fehler. Gut gesehen, danke.
12017-03-13 19:14:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node? Looks weird.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4571244663

Jan
22017-03-14 00:37:24 UTCMacLondon Thanks Jan,
I have now corrected my completely mistyped entry to what I had intended to enter
12017-03-13 19:07:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used various spellings of the same key:
'physically _challenged'
'physically_challenged'
'physically_ challenged'
'physically challenged'
Please, use only one spelling, otherwise the data is rather useless. Also, please use tags that are already in use and don't invent new ones. 'physi...
12017-03-12 15:06:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
what are all these nodes? None of them has any tag. Could you check this and / or delete them?

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-12 13:01:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
are those 'meta' tags on this building really necessary? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436232310

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-12 12:46:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded 220 objects with the tag "Yess = Building". Could you correct this? 'building=yes' would be correct.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-12 12:36:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
On this node you used some non-English keys to describe the object: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4726295753

In OSM one must use common tags as described in the Wiki - otherwise the information can not be interpreted correctly by software. Please have a look to the wiki ...
12017-02-23 10:12:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
habe hier gerade ein paar 'backwart' in 'backward' korrigiert.

Und ein kleiner Tipp:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121635637
Die Angabe der Autobahn hier ist ein Fall für destination:ref:to und destination:symbol:to weil es sich um einen Hinweis auf eine zu erreichende, aber entfer...
22017-02-24 13:03:09 UTCsennewald63 Hallo mueschel,
danke für die Berichtigung von 'backward' .
Mite dem destination:ref:to und destination:symbol:to stehe ich auf Kriegsfuß, da es für mich zu unausgegoren ist.
Im Proposed features/Destination details https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination...
32017-02-24 18:04:32 UTCmueschel Hier hatte ich mal eine kleine Zusammenstellung im Wiki gemacht:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging

Mein Tool ist da sicher nicht das Maß der Dinge - ich rendere einfach das, was ich für wichtig halte. Zur besseren Darstellung sind die :to nur ein kle...
42017-03-10 19:10:38 UTCsennewald63 Ich habe mir deine Erklärungen unter "User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging" nochmal rein gezogen und dabei drei Probleme gefunden.
1. Du solltest mit angeben, dass auch "destination:symbol:to*" für die Einsortierung des entsprechenden Symbols notwendig ist.
2. Die Farbe b...
52017-03-11 13:55:09 UTCmueschel Lass uns das per Mail besprechen, ich schreibe dir gerade.
12017-03-10 08:17:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/253789222
There are several 'linz:' tags on thia node - was this a mistake?
Jan
22017-03-10 08:41:19 UTCworldwidewolford It looks like those tags predate my edit. I am on and have been editing on mobile, so any research you can do into those tags would be great, but they were not added by me.
Cheers
32017-03-10 15:55:24 UTCmueschel Before your edit the keys were in upper case, e.g. LINZ:layer. These are very common in NZ.
You changed it to lower case - might be a software issue with OsmAnd?
42017-03-10 20:31:14 UTCworldwidewolford Oh wow. This must be an issue with OsmAnd. I will send a bug report about that. Could you fix those tags for me? Thanks for picking that up.
52017-03-11 13:41:59 UTCmueschel Changed the tags back.
12017-03-11 13:37:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you added many buildings with the tag "addr:pro" which should be "addr:province". Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nqy
12017-03-10 09:27:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded a huge sset of objects, which are mainly tagged with foreign tags which most likely should not appear in Osm. Could you check and correct this?
Jan

Examples:
ACCESS_TYP=Open Access
ACRES=48.743
AGNCY_ID=1328
AGNCY_LEV=City
AGNCY_NAME=Scotts Valley, City...
22017-03-10 17:34:49 UTCstevea I wouldn't say "huge" as it is a few dozen edits over the course of a few hours in a single day (and I'm not done yet) against the over 12,000 edits I have entered over the last eight years.

Is your problem with "foreign tags?" I kept these in to distinguish these CPAD polygo...
32017-03-10 17:56:39 UTCmueschel I didn't complain about the import of the polygons as such. That's fine if it is done carefully.
I'd suggest to keep one ref tag only, like ref:CPAD. This should be sufficient to allow for future updates.

Other tags like ACRES and COUNTY are just redundant because they can easily be retrieved f...
42017-03-10 18:06:41 UTCstevea Thank you for your quick reply. I can certainly endeavor to reduce and/or conflate tags on future CPAD polygon entries, as I do agree that they do contain a large amount of metadata. Some is useful and some is not (to OSM) and as long as a polygon in OSM can be identified as mapping back to a uniq...
12017-03-10 09:35:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw several keys with spaces in your edits. Please check the spelling of keys. Examples:

'fire operator' -> 'fire_operator'
'water tank: street' -> 'water_tank:street'
(and several more)
Jan
12017-03-10 09:29:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used some new landcover tags in your edits to specify density and age. I think it would be a good idea to describe these tags in the wiki by writing a proposal for them.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-10 14:15:16 UTCigitov Hi,
thanks for comment.
These landcover tags are still "raw", not final.
In the Russian-speaking OSM-community there is a discussion on the scheme for tagging landscapes (woodlands, shrubs, etc.). Much can change. Writing proposal still premature.
12017-03-10 09:23:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded almost 100 nodes with a spelling mistake: 'toilest' instead of 'toilets' - could you have a look an fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-10 09:22:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:21:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:20:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:20:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:19:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:19:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-09 08:57:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
this node doesn't seem to be tagged right. Could you putsome common tags there?

Jan
12017-03-08 08:58:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
There are several ways with a lot of strange tags here, like 'gdforderen'. Could you check and fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-03-08 10:57:18 UTCLogicalViolinist Do you have a way id? I might have missed deleting the garbage from geobase/toporama if not I can try to look for it
32017-03-08 12:42:52 UTCLogicalViolinist Think I found it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478904955
I'll fix it up
42017-03-08 14:06:15 UTCmueschel Here is a link to overpass turbo:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nlu
3 ways left.

Thanks for taking care!
Jan
52017-03-08 14:43:59 UTCLogicalViolinist shouldn't be any left, thanks for the heads up :)
12017-03-07 13:17:03 UTCmueschel Hallo,
Ich habe hier öfters das Tag "parking:conditions" gefunden - das gibt es sonst nirgends. Du meinst sicher "access=...". Schaust du da nochmal drüber?

Gruß, Jan
22017-03-07 14:55:21 UTCKeineHeimat Hallo,
ich habe das feature hier gelesen: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking:lane#Definieren_der_Parkplatznutzung

Gruß,
Jan
32017-03-07 15:15:54 UTCmueschel Dieses Tag wird für Parkstreifen entlang von Straßen verwendet, nicht für Parkplätze. Mir ist es deswegen aufgefallen, weil du "conditions" mit "s" schriebst.
42017-03-07 19:15:22 UTCKeineHeimat Upps, ändere ich die Tage - bin im Moment unterwegs!

Gruß
Jan
12017-03-07 09:23:15 UTCmueschel Please don't change the established wikipedia tag to things like
described-in-wikipedia
described_in_wikipedia
listed_in_wikipedia
listed-in-wikipedia
and so on. Such changes have to be discussed first.

Jan
22017-03-07 14:20:17 UTCnyuriks Hi, you are right that they need to be more organized. I made a proposal for it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikipedia_tag_types

Also, thanks to wikidata, we can clean up wikipedia tags now (almost 2,000 already done):
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Yurik/OSM_wiki_t...
12016-08-19 12:51:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
der Key "healthcare_speciality" gibt es sonst nicht, das sollte "health_specialty:XYZ" heißen. Siehe
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/health_specialty#similar

Gruß, Jan
22016-08-19 17:43:57 UTCFischkopp0815 Danke, ich habe es korrigiert
32017-03-05 19:08:06 UTChighflyer74 Moin Ihr zwei!

Genau genommen muß es nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare getaggt werden. Also healthcare:speciality=*

Gruss aus HB!
42017-03-05 19:18:47 UTCmueschel Das ist ein "konkurrierendes" Tagging Schema. Beide sind ähnlich oft in Verwendung (etwa 11000 zu 7000) und beide sind im Wiki dokumentiert (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0/Specialties ) U.a. erlaubt es eine feinere Abstufung und einfacheres Taggen...
52017-03-06 05:48:10 UTChighflyer74 Moin Jan! Ja, richtig. Ich erinnere mich gerade wieder, das wir das Thema beim Bremer Treffen erörtert hatten, uns dann aber für das andere entschieden haben, da das von Dir angesprochene nie über den Proposal Status hinauskam. Eigentlich eine unhaltbare Situation für ein nicht g...
12017-02-26 12:44:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
you imported a lot of points with elevation data in this changeset.
Please note that the tagging is wrong and because of that these points can not be used in OSM. Elevations are tagged using the 'ele' key. Sources should be given in the changeset source tag, but not individually on each of th...
22017-02-26 15:12:54 UTCptal_io Thank you for the comment. I have removed the erroneous tags and added ele tags as well as source information to the changeset commit.
32017-03-05 15:48:21 UTCmueschel All the wrong tags are still there and have not been deleted.
42017-03-05 17:20:18 UTCptal_io Apologies. This has been rectified in changeset 46600439
12017-03-05 15:43:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
you essentially flooded a huge area by adding landuse=basin to large polygons. Also, most of the tags are from a foreign source and do not belong into the OSM database:
NUNIVOTTO6=843131
NUNIVOTTO7=8431311
Shape_Area=2.42385595961E8
Shape_Leng=79016.1029871
surface=2423...
12017-03-05 15:34:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please pay a bit of attention to the spelling of keys - I found various versions of the word "wheelchair" in your edits. With spelling mistakes these tags can not be understood by any software.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-05 13:31:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
17 of the nodes have the strange key "|ODS:nevenadres" - could you check that? Pipes in keys are not common.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-05 18:01:37 UTCde vries Yes I know, I'll fix it. I postponed fixing it for debug reasons .
12017-03-05 12:50:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag on this way - was it a mistake?
Cheers, Jan

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477789206
22017-03-05 12:55:27 UTCFvGordon Please ask the creator of version 1.
Greetings, Franz
32017-03-05 13:15:41 UTCmueschel Sorry, I didn't see this changeset - but thanks to his changeset comment it is clear it should be 'source'.
mueschel has contributed to 500 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 1001 comment(s) (limit: 500 changesets)