Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-11-18 11:26:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these ways do have the tags
Tracks=yes
tracks=yes
If these are streets used by farmers, the correct tag is "highway=track" would you mind changing that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-18 13:20:01 UTCJean-Pierre WEZA Hi Mueschel,

Thanks for your comment.
i'm just uploading changes for this

Cheers !

JP
32017-12-17 12:59:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are still more than 9000 objects edited by you with the tag "tracks=yes".
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/tQC
12017-12-16 11:20:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "addr:sreet" on many objects. The correct spelling would be "addr:street". Could you have a look and fix these?
Cheers, Jan
12017-12-16 11:19:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "add:village" on many roads, unfortunately there are two issues:
1. it should be "addr:city"
2. this tag is only used for addresses of buildings, not on roads. If necessary you could add "is_in:city" on roads, but this is not needed if the city i...
12017-12-16 11:16:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you imported a lot of data for hotels here. Unfortunately, some of the tagging is wrong:
E.g. here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2428498001

- add:postcode should be addr:postcode
- there is no "award" tag, the proposal has been rejected
- 'stars' should only c...
12017-12-15 12:23:03 UTCmueschel Hallo,
bei 24 dieser Wege soll es wohl "railway:track_ref" und nicht "railway:trak_ref" heissen. Schaust du da mal drüber?
Gruss, Jan
12017-12-14 13:22:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you point us to the documentation of this import?
Jan
22017-12-14 14:10:03 UTCITineris_bulk Hi Jan,

Of course.

Thread on the Tagging mailing list:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-August/033148.html

Thread in the Hungarian group:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/openstreetmap-hungary/scCgOWB0JpQ
(This includes the proposed osmChange file.)

The ne...
12017-12-13 11:56:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag "maxspeed:permanent" you used here is new and undocumented. Could you explain its meaning?

Thanks, Jan
22017-12-13 14:43:18 UTCroute56 I used "maxspeed:permanent" as a placeholder. It should be self-explanatory, but just in case: the current "maxspeed" tag of 55 mph is the currently posted speed limit due to long-term construction. Once the project is completed,the limit will be raised to 75 mph, and the tag wil...
12017-12-13 11:33:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check the tagging of some nodes? There are 52 nodes with the tag "Natural=trees" which should be "natural=tree".

Jan
12017-12-13 11:31:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
I guess something went wrong here, all these roads have many imported tags that don't look like they belong to the OSM database. Could you check and fix that?

Cheers, Jan
12017-12-12 11:45:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
these nodes contain tags with spelling mistakes:
addr:neigh -> addr:neighbourhood
addr:postc -> addr:postcode
Could you please have a look and fix these 319 POIs?

Thanks, Jan
22017-12-12 11:47:00 UTCmueschel and:
addr:house \t-> addr:housenumber

Some do have "addr:house = 0", which doesn't seem to be a valid housenumber.
32017-12-13 18:37:59 UTCCENTSOARER I'm on it. Thanks.
42017-12-13 19:08:37 UTCCENTSOARER I fixed the bad keys/values. It was a distraction on my side, I'm sorry. Once again, thank you mueschel.
12017-12-10 19:25:19 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier Tags benutzt wie "Mo. - Fr. = ..." oder "tel.:". Bitte benutze nur Keys wie sie im Wiki beschrieben sind, also "opening_hours" und "phone", sonst kann keine Software etwas mit den Informationen anfangen.

Gruß, Jan
12017-12-09 19:16:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
these edits introduced several strange tags on 14 objects:
GENERIC \tTP
OBJECTID \t3276
SHAPESTAre \t9.218000289160156E7
SHAPESTLen \t84464.43847961596
Zoning \tTP

Could you check & fix this?
Thanks, Jan
22017-12-09 21:13:00 UTCstevea No fixes necessary, they are part of an "official" (local government) import, now in its third revision since the initial 2009 v1 import.

See https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Santa_Cruz_County,_California#Landuse
32017-12-09 21:14:55 UTCstevea As has become the custom over the years as our attitudes and conventions towards imports changes (and improves), these tags will be reduced or removed altogether in the v4 update to these data, anticipated in 2019 or 2020. As per the "Multipolygonization" discussion on talk-us in November...
42017-12-09 21:38:18 UTCmueschel The tags I mentioned are new to OSM, not used before. And they are not mentioned on your Wiki page as well.
52017-12-09 21:46:40 UTCstevea Yes, SHAPE_STAr and SHAPE_STLe are mentioned in the wiki. Look, this is an eight-year old import with data that are carefully curated, documented and promised to not only be updated (with v4) but also improved with the next version (via multipolygonization). In the initial import (messy as documen...
12017-12-09 19:19:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this relation? I can't make sense of the tag "nx = l"
12017-12-09 11:05:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
in your edits I found some nodes with tags like "Meccanico = Meccanico Marella". This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look at the wiki about common
tags for shops or amenities.
Let ...
12017-12-09 11:00:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found some spelling mistakes in these edits - instead of the correct "species" you wrote "specices" and "speices". Could you please check and correct these?

Cheers, Jan
12017-12-09 10:57:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please make sure that all the tags you use are spelled correctly - otherwise they can not be used by any software. E.g.
"fr: naf" should be "ref:FR:NAF"
"fr: siret" should be "ref:FR:SIRET"
In these cases you used many different spell...
12017-12-08 18:09:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your edits you invented several new tags like these:
no: of rooms
staff: Name
For both of them, you used many (at least 11) different spellings. Please only use tags that are described in the wiki, everything else can not be understood by any software and is therefore rather useless.
12017-12-07 11:41:56 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier den Key "roof:ridges" benutzt - richtig wäre "roof:ridge". Kannst du das noch korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan
22017-12-07 11:52:21 UTCgmbo danke für den Hinweis,
werde heute abend ändern.
12017-12-07 11:40:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "kaart" to all these ways - this is new and undocumented. Could you explain its meaning?

Thanks, Jan
22017-12-07 14:09:34 UTCgarylancelot No, this is a key that I use while editing to find ways with certain errors. I will revert the change. It was not intentionally uploaded. Thank you!
12017-12-07 11:38:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check the spelling of keys? I saw several spelling mistakes there, e.g. in "building:part",
For example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544925864

Cheers, Jan
12017-12-05 11:42:01 UTCmueschel Kannst du hier und beim nächsten Gebäude die housenumber-Tags prüfen? Da stimmt etwas nicht.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309245360
Gruß, Jan
12017-12-04 11:57:54 UTCandrewsh Hi,

Thanks for your edits.

According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbungalow, it should be building=bungalow, not building=bunglow (sic: missing "a").

It would be great if you used the correct spelling for your future edits.
22017-12-05 11:21:10 UTCmueschel The same holds for 2700 buildings with the tag "builing:levels" which should be "building:levels".
And there are buildings mapped twice, e,g, around 7th Commercial Street.
32017-12-05 11:26:36 UTCandrewsh Indeed, I haven't noticed that.
12017-12-04 19:07:50 UTCmueschel Ist das hier wirklich ein Park oder eine Fläche mit Bäumen? Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1228213
12017-12-04 18:18:30 UTCtrigpoint Hi
These 'heritage:operator' tags you have added seem a little odd. What is the source of this information. Did you visit these sites to confirm?

Cheers Phil
22017-12-04 18:56:09 UTCmueschel Hi Phil,
I didn't add them, this was brianboru in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54115710
I just corrected the spelling from an '_' to a ':', assuming it was just a spelling mistake and the content was correct.

Jan
12017-12-04 11:49:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I found some nodes like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5256902958
There is only one tag describing the object, but no known tag as they are documented in the Wiki. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the d...
12017-12-03 21:21:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543957467
The tagging doesn't look right.

Cheers, Jan
12017-12-03 13:48:32 UTCmueschel Please fix your workflow to include spell checking of tags. I'm fixing wrong spellings of 'implicit' almost every day.
22017-12-05 04:47:34 UTCsaikabhi Hello Mueschel,

Thank you for solving this error. I will be informing my team of this error and we will also be running a linter to detect these issues.

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-12-03 10:56:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
you've added 777 buildings with a misspelled tag: "builing:levels" instead of "building:levels". Could you have a look and fix these?

Cheers, Jan
22017-12-05 16:04:35 UTCHarald Hartmann I have informed the DWG to block him, because he still uploads these wrong keys (and value)
12017-12-02 13:37:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM! I found several nodes with tags like this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5255840747

This might be a description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look at the wiki about common
tags for shops or amenities.
Let ...
12017-11-28 21:48:59 UTCdgitto Hi. there are 53 nodes with the wrong key "Nom" (could be "name") and no other tags (I suppose they are places).
Also, the coordinates as tags are useless
22017-12-02 11:39:06 UTCmueschel I think these points should be deleted - they are imported from some unknown source, unknown license. The tagging is not properly done and simple retagging to e.g. place=village does not really help data quality.

Jan
32017-12-02 12:57:17 UTCEdgar François Loua I'm agree with you we going to delete them
12017-12-01 13:35:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
I don't know precisely what happened here, but there are various keys with a trailing space, like "foot " instead of "foot". I fixed some of them - please check if I catched all of them.

Jan
22017-12-01 13:45:18 UTCDaveF Hi
Thanks. I noticed OSMose flagged a couple others. Will clear when I've work out why it's occurring. It's a shame editors don't automatically truncate whitespace.
12017-12-01 10:42:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you invented some new tags here,
usefulaaltomap:id, usefulaaltomap:show

These are not used in other places and are not documented. Could you explain there meaning? To me it looks a bit like a ref number, and a ref:XXX tag would be a good choice.

Jan
22017-12-01 11:16:33 UTCrkdarst Hi,

Thanks for your feedback! I've been working on a project called UsefulAaltoMap, a better university map. It's still relatively new, most of the philosophy can be found here: https://github.com/usefulaaltomap/usefulaaltomap

I have tried to use OSM standards as much as possible, but decide...
32017-12-01 11:57:36 UTCmueschel Thanks! Good to know that there is some documentation and planning behind.

Some ideas about keys:
usefulaaltomap:uid -> short_name
usefulaaltomap:id -> ref:university, ref:aalto
usefuaaltomap:show -> this is a bit problematic because it just tells one specific renderer what to do - as...
12017-12-01 10:46:55 UTCmueschel I found many tags like these in your edits:
change:forward_1
turn:lanes:backward_1
turn:lanes:forward_1
turn:lanes:both_ways_1

Please watch out for correct tags, especially correct use of :forward and :backward!
22017-12-01 10:50:02 UTCMinh Nguyen Yikes, sorry about that! I’ve been manually entering these in iD, and unfortunately, iD silently adds the _1 instead of forcing me to notice the existing tag. I’ll double-check my edits for this error in the future. Thanks for noticing!
32017-12-01 10:59:28 UTCMinh Nguyen https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/3625
12017-12-01 09:34:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several nodes which do not have any common tag on them, like this one.
Most of the data actually looks like random key presses ('12345','qwerty', etc.)
Please do not add such tags to the OSM database. Use only tags as they are described in the Wiki and that have actual relevance.
...
12017-12-01 09:25:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "distrito" to these buildings - this key is new und undocumented. Is this number part of the address? Then it should have a key like "addr:...".

Jan
22017-12-01 09:46:04 UTCsantamariense Hi @mueschel, I have just talked him about that. We are searching another way to map such thing. As soon as we decide about, it will be changed.
12017-11-30 13:56:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't forget the '_' in keys:
zone:De_Lijn
ref:De_Lijn
12017-11-28 21:40:40 UTCdgitto Hi. what does "hazus" means? it was never used as OSM tag
22017-11-29 16:49:24 UTCOh Henry It is a building classification code. I work in flood hazard analysis and use a program called HAZUS to estimate risk and vulnerability in a floodzone (can be used for other natural disasters), I have been using OSM building footprints in other cities to help determine where buildings are, and th...
32017-11-29 20:37:17 UTCdgitto There is no problem, as far as I know.
You will better ask to the community, soon or later
42017-11-30 13:15:53 UTCmueschel You don't need tags like COM1, COM2 and so on - this can all be covered by the existing and established 'building' tag.
If you actually want to introduce a new tag, you should write a description for the Wiki and ask the community for comments.
12017-11-30 13:10:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're adding the tag "amenity_02 \t=car_wash" to fuel stations - there is no such key used in any other place.
The correct tag would be "car_wash = yes"

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-30 13:45:33 UTCRps333 ok
12017-11-29 11:53:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag 'exit_number' is new. I would suggest to use a more common tagging scheme such as one of these keys:
ref
loc_ref
ref:exit

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-29 15:41:31 UTCstigwood Hey, thanks for helping me out, I'm learning as I go. I'm trying to give these nodes unique identifiers, especially because things like whether or not they are ticket holder entrances, distance from platform, etc. are not included. I'll try to do this with existing tags, depending on what's availa...
12017-11-29 11:48:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the name tags on this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542957296

'name:jabane:ja-Hira' looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
12017-11-29 11:41:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw that you added many species tags to these trees - in general it is sufficient to just have the species tag and no translations. These can be easily looked up if needed, e.g. using wikidata. (This is the same as with other tags, we also do not translate e.g. "building=house" to o...
12017-11-29 11:39:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
on about 30 objects I found the tag "name: en" - could you change this to the correct spelling "name:en"?

Thanks, Jan
12017-11-28 11:45:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check the tagging - on hundreds of nodes you put the tag "adrr:district" instead of "addr:district"

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-28 16:37:27 UTCdannykath_peruimport Hi Jan Thank for flagging this :)
I will fix this!
Cheers, Danny
12017-11-28 11:41:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
here you used the new key 'classe_de_p' on several ways - what is its meaning?

Jan
22017-11-28 17:27:41 UTCPenegal Hi.

It was an error. A lot of my recent changestes regarding power lines contain data imported form the open data of RTE, the French electricity transport operator (https://opendata.rte-france.com/explore/?sort=modified). "classe_de_p" is the truncated form of "classe_de_precision&...
12017-11-28 11:31:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the spelling of some of these tags? 'singal_rider', 'requirment'

Also, you used the key 'tracktype' which is typically used in a very different context. And some of the values ('Steel') are in upper case, while OSM typically uses lower case.

jan
12017-11-28 11:21:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you specify the precise source of your data? Most maps are copyrighted and can not be copied to OSM.

Also, please fix the tagging. You used tags like these:
Denumire=Dealu Sofarului
elevatie=297.0
Both of them are unknown in OSM and should be 'name' and 'ele'.

Jan
12017-11-27 11:53:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you imported some external data set of fuel stations - all these nodes are not properly tagged, mostly duplicating already existing POIs and you don't state the source of this data.
Please follow the Import Guidelines for such edits:
https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&...
22017-11-27 11:54:10 UTCmueschel Sorry for the link, here is the correct one:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
12017-11-27 11:46:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this POI?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542404386

The key "310" looks like a mistake, and is the name tag really correct?

Jan
22017-11-27 11:53:02 UTCTuanIfan Hi mueschel,

Thanks for telling me. Yeah youre right, the key 310 is certainly a mistake. I will take it down soon.

As for the name, it was actually a series of Chinese words. As i can barely read a few words, i couldn't write them in full. I'll certainly edit the name later, when i'm back the...
12017-11-27 11:39:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "ref." to several nodes - the '.' looks like a mistake - could you check that?
For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5244590162

Cheers, Jan
12017-11-27 08:07:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this way?
Is "Folwarek Jamy" the name?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542247985

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-28 09:50:18 UTCwmyrda hi,
Folwarek was a proper name. I didnt notice that while adding new object instead of editing name field I edited tag itself.

It is fixed now.
12017-11-27 08:01:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the key "nombre_de_c" on several ways like this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542382056
Is this supposed to be 'circuits' or 'cables'?

Cheers, Jan
12017-11-27 07:59:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added a new tag on this way - could you explain its meaning?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542222498
Maybe we can find some common tag for this in the Wiki?

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-27 09:13:15 UTCTruchin Bah, c'est un copier coller malheureux (ctrl+C ctrl+V). Le passage Forceval est ici :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24979242

Bonne continuation

Thomas
32017-11-27 10:10:03 UTCTruchin Ich hätte auf Deutsch antworten können ;).
Der "Passage Forceval" ist eine Strasse von Paris. Das ist kein neuer Tag sondern einfach nur ein Fehler von mir...
12017-11-26 13:42:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several objects with just the tag "OMM=JM" like this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542118702
Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-11-26 13:29:55 UTCmueschel Welcome to OSM.
I found tags like these on your edits:
Amenity = Furniture Designer
Architect = Architect
amenity = Interior Designer
function = Restaurant Designer
This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Please have a...
12017-11-26 13:25:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several French keys to these hydrants, e.g.
diamètre
débit
pression
Could you change them to common tags? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions_(part_2)

Jan
22017-11-28 08:46:34 UTCRom1 Bonjour, j'ai corrigé les tags cf. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=54131854
12017-11-26 11:42:27 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM.
Hier scheint etwas nicht zu stimmen - du hast diese Straße als "motorway", also als Autobahn eingetragen. Vorher war sie ein "unclassified", was wahrscheinlich richtig war.
Außerdem ist dein Changeset-Kommentar "6t Beschränkung...
12017-11-25 13:48:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
you invented some new tags here, could you explain the meaning of them?

Ellip ht = 1624.112 (meters)
Ortho ht = 1639.9 (meters)

Thanks, Jan
12017-11-25 12:43:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541538419
"onewayno = yes" looks like a mistake.
Cheers, Jan
12017-11-24 19:27:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
in these edits I found several untagged ways, some of them I corrected, but I don't know if I found them all. Could you have a look and check that?

Jan
22017-11-25 21:49:28 UTCSverigeFan Hej mueschel / Jan,

Thank you for your hint !
JOSM was crashing wh3en uploading some changesets this day, I recoverd the data form auto-saved layers and uploaded again - that may have caused the doubled points, I should have checked an cleaned up afterwards - which I did now I hope. Please feel ...
12017-11-22 11:57:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
I guess this should be tagged shop=rental:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4463864799
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Drental

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-22 23:32:43 UTCdieterdreist Hello Jan, I know the place well, it is a scooter and bike rental and tour operator (has a license to offer guided tours). I don’t like the generic shop=rental tag, and it generally has very low acceptance (few uses). Another tag could be travel agency with bike rental as property.
32017-11-23 20:04:31 UTCmueschel If you can't buy bicycles but rent them, then it can't be a shop=bicycle, but is a perfect fit for shop=rental. I'm not aware of a dedicated tag for guided tours, despite some keys containing "guided_tours".
12017-11-22 12:14:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found some name tags with a spelling different to the usual one - OSM depends a lot on precise spelling of keys, otherwise software can not handle the information.
The common tags for Japanese names are name:ja_rm, name:ja_kana and name:ja-Hira
Could you check your edits and change the nam...
12017-11-22 10:55:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some new keys here:
|ODS=true
|ODS:secondaryaddress=false
These are new and don't seem to be documented. Also, keys should consist of latin letters only, without special characters like '|'. Could you have a look at these?

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-22 19:45:13 UTCSander H These are temporary keys used by Dutch BAG import plugin and should be removed by the plugin before upload. Probably used the wrong layer to work in. Cleaned up in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54010665
Thanks for spotting this!
12017-11-21 17:06:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of the tag population:cuunt and its various other spellings you usd here?
please note that OSM does not want to provide personal information about people, just objects like houses. Please have a look to the wiki to see how them are tagged properly.

Cheers, Jan
12017-11-21 14:49:28 UTCmueschel Hi Piotr,
could you check the tagging of these objects? You used tags like "Lote \t= Lote vago residencial', which can not be used for OSM. It might be a good description, but no software can understand it. Only tags that are described in the wiki can be used.

Enjoy mapping!
Jan
12017-11-21 14:38:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check this import. All the nodes have foreign tags only.
Besides, did you follow the import guidelines and did you check the license of the source of this data?

Jan
12017-11-19 12:31:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check the cycleway tag of this way?
Something went wrong, there is a '=' in the key.

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-20 00:47:25 UTCVia-velo Hi Jan, I am trying add a cycle lane going in the opposite direction of a one-way street on the left side. The tag (cycleway:left=opposite_lane) that I found on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway. I am using iD editor. Did I put the tag in the correct box, or should I be using another e...
32017-11-20 01:46:49 UTCVia-velo Hi Jan, I think I've got it now. I changed the tag to cycleway:left in the first column and opposite_lane in the second column of the All tags field.
Cheers, Paul
42017-11-20 09:18:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
yes, now it's correct. The '=' separates key and value and you have to put those to separate fields.
But: Is the lane really on the wrong side of the road? :left and :right is always with respect to the direction of the way, not the direction of travel. Direction of the way is indicated by f...
52017-11-20 10:11:24 UTCVia-velo Hi Jan,
Thanks for the suggestion, I have dropped off :left. Yes, the cycle lane is in the opposite direction to the flow of traffic.
Cheers, Paul
12017-11-19 15:08:57 UTCmueschel Sollte diese Baustelle nicht schon fertig sein?
12017-11-19 11:33:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
you've added the tag "Restored = Yes" to several ways. Please note that OSM is case sensitive and most keys and values have to use lower-case letters.

Cheers, Jan
12017-11-19 11:28:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check these changes? I found several nodes with many strange tags like these:
beneficiar \tnull
camp_code \tnull
comment \tnull
electricit \tnull
elevated \tnull
fire_safe \tnull
http://osm.org/node/5223687257
12017-11-09 09:44:37 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier einige Wegweiser eingetragen und Tags wie "direction:north" verwendet. Die übliche Schreibweise ist "direction_north" mit einem Unterstrich.

Gruß, Jan
22017-11-18 11:46:50 UTCuboot Hallo Jan.
Da habe ich wohl nicht genau genug geschaut und mich von anderen Tags verleiten lassen. Ich sehe zu, dass ich das wieder korrigierte.
Danke für den Hinweis und Grüße,
Markus
32017-11-18 13:15:59 UTCmueschel Hallo Markus,
danke für die Rückmeldung, inzwischen sind die Tags schon korrigiert, brauchst nicht mehr suchen.
12017-11-18 13:14:30 UTCmueschel Hallo Theodin,
ich habe ein paar Wegweiser von dir gefunden mit Tags wie "direction:Fellbach=0.6" - insgesamt 15 Tags.
Würdest du die auf ein gängiges Schema ändern? Wir haben entweder "direction_north" u.ä. oder die umfassenden Relationen mit type=relation...
12017-11-18 13:08:11 UTCmueschel Hi Petr,
it's an old changeset, but I just stumbled across this node and its tag "direction:highway=-1" - this is used only here, maybe you can revise this tagging?
Cheers, Jan
12017-11-18 11:37:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "sharrows" here, which is new and undocumented. Did you mean cycleway=shared_lane ?

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-28 20:54:46 UTCHeather Shearer I did mean to say that, thanks for catching it! (we had a local tagging guide with the wrong scheme - local guide now fixed, along with the tag on this bit of road)
12017-11-18 11:23:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
here you added the tag "mdds:code", a week ago it was "MDDS_Code". Could you change to a common spelling of the key?
Btw, if this is kind of a reference number used by government, I'd consider "ref:mdds" as better.

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-18 21:17:05 UTCsfrank Hi,
first I did not find any tag for the MDDS-code (sort of e goverment code, found in census2011 documents and others), and also only less information for village tagging in india. But then I found a (older) discussion entry https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2012-May/001630.html (...
12017-09-28 12:02:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're adding a huge number of new and undocumented tags on these objects (listed below). Please clean this up. The number of nodes on each object also seems to be much too high - especially those half-circular shapes.

LCC \tA12-A2-A6
aream2 \t97530.06567
date \t1-spt-2017
escala \t1:25k\...
22017-10-04 16:13:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
32017-11-18 11:19:47 UTCmueschel Hi PC10,
did you actually read and understand all the changeset comments and the user block message?
Your edits have been deleted because of their quality. Now you start over and re-import all of this again? Please stop it!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53884840
12017-11-17 12:06:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
I'm not sure if the conditional tagging actually means the right thing. Is access fully closed in the morning? Then it should be "access=no".
And vice versa, if everybody is allowed, you need a access:conditional tag.

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-17 12:15:09 UTCmanings Hi Jan,

This the mapillary I used: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=5c24R-YQaeEW-39S7dOprQ&focus=photo&lat=37.783862&lng=-122.393088&z=17

From the image, it shows only HOV restriction.
32017-11-17 12:21:02 UTCmueschel I can't read the orange sign, is this dates or times mentioned there?
42017-11-17 12:22:41 UTCmanings its the white sign: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/353700/32947045-064b9c6a-cbc0-11e7-8b62-c8378ccea236.png
52017-11-17 12:28:16 UTCmueschel The orange sign says something additional about "ramp closed".

On the white sign I'm also not sure about the precise meaning - is it "hov: only in the afternoon" (hov not allowed in the morning) or "in the afternoon: hov only" (everybody allowed in the morning, but ...
12017-11-17 10:44:15 UTCmueschel Moin,
hier hätten wir einen Weg mit einem Tagging-Fehler, sollte das ein "fixme" werden?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539430095

Gruß, Jan
22017-11-17 11:15:22 UTCfkv Ja, danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe es korrigiert.
12017-11-17 10:28:20 UTCmueschel Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags. It is "building" and "condition". Any wrong spelling means that the data is not usable at all!
Please check all your edits, there are hundreds of such mistakes.
See also:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53364164
http...
12017-11-16 21:32:48 UTCmueschel Check doch bitte hier mal das Tagging - da ist etwas schiefgegangen:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428200381
Jan
12017-11-15 21:11:04 UTCmueschel 3 ungetaggte Objekte sind übrig: http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%28node%5B%22Stand_am%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22Stand_am%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22Stand_am%22%5D%3B%29%3Bout%20meta%3B
12017-11-14 11:37:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check these buildings? It looks like you uploaded some of them twice, and one copy has no proper tags, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538922549

Cheers
Jan
12017-11-14 11:26:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain what this node represents? I can't make any sense out of the tags.

Thanks
Jan
12017-11-14 09:48:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
I guess something went wrong here, many buildings got tags like these:
BFSNr=2701
GWR_EGID=243008474
Qualitaets=AV93
Stand_am=2007
TID=8106
Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan
22017-11-14 11:02:52 UTCNakaner Hallo Johannes,

du kannst dir auch für JOSM eigene Validatorregeln schreiben, die nach solchen Tags suchen und dich warnen, bevor du sie versehentlich hochlädst. Beispiele findest du unter https://github.com/OpenRailwayMap/OpenRailwayMap/blob/master/validator/openrailwaymap.validator.ma...
32017-11-14 20:32:42 UTCjohsin18 Danke für den Hinweis, sollte jetzt korrigiert sein. Bzgl. dem Validator wollte ich schon fragen, werde das mal probieren.
12017-11-14 09:38:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 95 objects with the tag 'bottom width'. I guess this should be 'bottom_width', even though this tag is not documented at all.
Please fix this

Jan
12017-11-13 18:31:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
ich glaube, diese Schilder heißen gar nicht "WIldruhezone", sondern erklären sie, oder? Dann wäre das "name" Tag nicht richtig sondern "description" (Beschreibung) oder "inscription" (Beschriftung) das passende.
Gruß, Jan
22017-11-14 11:10:19 UTCRoman Wilder Hallo Jan,
sowohl, als auch. Die aufgestellten Schilder sind eine Kombination aus dem Schild "Wildruhezone", einer Übersichtkarte und einer Erklärung mit Verweis auf die erlassene Verordnung durch das LRA Bayreuth aus 2013.

Grüße, Andreas
12017-11-13 11:40:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several ways with tags like
Layer = 5
R_type =3
Could you fix this and put a proper OSM tag there?

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-13 12:24:03 UTCsharifiali Hello
yes I try to edit this ..
32017-11-13 12:35:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
let me know in case you need help.
Here you can find all 7 ways:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sWB
42017-11-13 12:57:47 UTCsharifiali Hi
Thank you
I will use of your Guidance
52017-11-13 13:01:06 UTCsharifiali if you may , please join to this group in telegram ..
some of editors are active in this group:
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAD3PaK8gbaQK0Ne8tA
12017-11-13 11:32:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of "Amen Place = yes"? This node has neither a physical nor a name tag. Could you work on the tagging here?
Cheers, Jan
12017-11-12 12:13:14 UTCmueschel Hallo Joerg, willkommen bei OSM.
Das Tag "name" ist wirklich nur für den Namen eines Objektes gedacht, nicht zur Beschreibung. In deinem Fall würde sich eventuell ein Tag "operator = DRK Wörrstadt" anbieten, und das "building=yes" könnte gegen ein s...
12017-11-11 18:32:16 UTCmueschel Hallo,
habe hier ein paar Knoten korrigiert, an denen du 'adr:' oder 'add:' anstelle von 'addr:' geschrieben hast. Ich hoffe ich habe alle erwischt, aber vielleicht schaust du nochmal drüber.

Gruß, Jan
22017-11-21 19:51:51 UTCwhellmut Hallo Jan,
vielen Dank für die Aufmerksamkeit und Korrektur. Das ist mir wohl im Eifer des Gefechts auf dem Tablet passiert.
Viele Grüße
Walter
12017-11-09 19:19:58 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ich sehe, dass du die im größeren Stil ref-Nummern von Denkmälern erfasst mit Tags wie ref:blankenheim_(ahr)=163
Ich denke es wäre besser hier ein gemeinsames Tag zu benutzen, anstelle eines neuen Keys für jeden Ort. Wäre ein "ref:UD" nicht ausreiche...
22017-11-09 20:14:46 UTCThoschi Hi,
ja, das mit der korrekten Doku der Quellenangaben ist eine Schwachstelle von mir. Geht häufig bei mir leider unter. Versuche mich zu bessern.
Aber in Blankenheim habe ich tatsächlich viele dieser Gebäude besichtigt, da ich in den Herbstferien dort im Urlaub war.

Bzgl. ref:<...
32017-11-09 20:44:46 UTCThoschi Hi,
ja, das mit der korrekten Doku der Quellenangaben ist eine Schwachstelle von mir. Geht häufig bei mir leider unter. Versuche mich zu bessern.
Aber in Blankenheim habe ich tatsächlich viele dieser Gebäude besichtigt, da ich in den Herbstferien dort im Urlaub war.

Bzgl. ref:<...
42017-11-11 12:46:50 UTCmueschel Ich würde in jedem Fall empfehlen, auf Sonderzeichen (Klammern, Umlaute) im Key zu verzichten, siehe auch dieses aktuelle Thema im Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60340
12017-11-11 10:50:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded twice the same dataset, containing points like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5221310477
They do not have any valid tag. I'm going to delete them, please upload this again _after_ you have fixed the tagging.

Jan
12017-11-10 18:43:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
you invented a new tag here - "speed_pedalic". Could you explain its meaning?

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-10 18:52:10 UTCdvdhoven https://www.gelderland.nl/speedpedelec

http://www.dvdhoven.nl/Afbeeldingen/SP.jpg
Kleine typo gemaakt in de tag, zal ik aanpassen
32017-11-10 19:55:37 UTCmueschel The name of the tag looks rather specific to the Netherlands. It might be a good idea to start a proposal for a generic tag for this type of vehicle. German law makes a similar distinction between electric bicycles and e-bikes.
12017-11-09 09:41:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several contact tags in your recent changesets. Unfortunately there is a spelling mistake:
"contact: email" - there should not be a space in the key. The same holds for 'contact:phone' and 'contact:website' (which more often is just 'website'. Could you have a look and fix...
22017-11-10 08:36:23 UTCpenelopew hi jan
thank you for your message. i am aware of the mistake and was going to update the changesets. seems someone already did.
as to your comment on contact:website - we were instructed to update these fields with "contact" by our classifications-group - this system obviously supports ...
32017-11-10 19:15:22 UTCmueschel Thanks for taking care of this spelling mistake.

As you say, 'contact:website' is correct, but used about 10 times less than 'website' which makes me prefer the latter.

Enjoy mapping!
Jan
12017-11-10 18:53:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
habe in deinen Edits in den letzten Tagen einige falsche Tags gefunden und korrigiert, wie dieses hier:
"abandoned:railway=water" = "yes"
Im Key darf kein '=' auftauchen und es muss "abandoned:railway" = "water_tower" heißen.

Gruß, Jan\...
12017-11-09 19:22:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I found the tag "địa chỉ" on several of your nodes. Tags should always be in English. Please have a look at the description in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vi:Key:addr
Could you change these tags accordingly?

Cheers, Jan
12017-11-09 09:39:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
the key 'colour_name' is new and not used in other places so far. There is actually no need for it, you can put the colour name directly in the 'colour' tag, it accepts all CSS colour names (in lower case and without dashes).

Cheers, Jan
12017-11-08 18:09:21 UTCmueschel Please don't import data from an unknown source. All these objects have only tags that should not appear in OSM, such as "layer =_WALKS_FOR_OSM". Please have a look at the Wiki how to tag e.g. highways and read the import guidelines. If you use an external source, you must state it in the ...
12017-11-07 09:53:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you invented many new tags in this changeset, like these:
buildingpart=vertical passage
buildingpart:vertical passage=elevator
buildingpart:vertical passage:floor range=0 to 29

Please have a look to the wiki how indoor mapping is actually done:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple...
12017-11-07 09:50:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
in this changeset, you invented many new keys like
blockage=concrete
drain_type=culvert
multiple_channels=no
profile_closed=round

These are not documented in the wiki and hence can not be understood by other mappers or any software. Please check if you can find another, more appropriate ...
12017-11-07 09:47:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these objects have many foreign tags, which seem to be imported from an external database and should not appear in OSM, like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538840834

This data can not be found on the source you stated - what is the actual source of this data and does it compl...
22017-11-07 15:16:56 UTCHarald Hartmann I think we should revert it immediately because there are also intersecting buildings:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538473003
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538841878

@mueschel: do you want to do it or should we inform the DWG?
32017-11-07 15:58:54 UTCnaoliv Clearly an undiscussed (and messy) import.
42017-11-08 01:29:48 UTCnaoliv This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 53594063, 53595661, 53597111 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed buildings import in RJ
12017-11-06 11:32:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I saw that you put the tag "địa chỉ" on these nodes. Please note that all tags in OSM have to be in English and are described in the wiki - in your case the correct tag would be "addr:full". Would you mind correcting these?

Cheers, Jan
12017-11-06 11:29:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I have two remarks:
Please don't put the nodes of the shops on the road - place a node at the side of the road, where the shop actually is.

Second, you used the tag "SĐT" on some shops. This tag is not used by anyone else up to now. If this is a registration num...
12017-11-05 12:18:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded almost 500 nodes with just the tag "taskStatus=VALIDATEDV2" - I guess this was a mistake and can be deleted?

Jan
22017-11-05 16:23:11 UTCViolaine_Do Hey, yes i wanted to correct it tomorrow, you found it before ! This changeset has to be reversed. I stopped the upload in the middle because realised it was going to upload wrong layer. So nothing from this changeset needs to be kept. If you have time to do it today, it would be the Best, else i'm ...
32017-11-05 17:17:14 UTCmueschel Alright, I've reverted it:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53533035

Cheers, Jan
12017-11-05 16:06:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of this object?

The tag you added might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look at the wiki about common
tags for shops or amenities.
Let us know in case you need help!

Jan

12017-11-05 16:01:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you describe what this objects are? You invented quite many new tags here and I can't find a description of them on the wiki.

Jan

Jan
12017-11-05 16:00:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you describe what this node is exactly?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5203310121
It has many tags describing what it is, but unfortunately this doesn't help in OSM. No software (and other mappers as well) can understand
it. Please have a look at the wiki about common
tags for shop...
12017-11-05 15:56:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please have a look at these changes? You added some "highway=residential" to objects which should rather be buildings.

Jan
22017-11-25 14:24:27 UTCSomeoneElse I've reviewed these, changed the "buildings" to buildings and removed some that just looked like a bit of concrete had been swept.
12017-11-05 15:53:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're adding the tag "building:condion" to many buildings - please note that the correct spelling is "building:condition". Could you have a look at these and fix it? Let us know if you need help!

Jan
12017-11-05 15:50:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found some objects with strange tags, could you explain the meaning of this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536945120
Consejo Comunal Urbakasitk 22 =C.C. URBCASITK22

This might be a description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a loo...
12017-11-05 13:20:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
this import of data looks rather strange, there seem to be a lot of errors.
- For example, the geometry has rooms with walls not matching the building walls, sticking out of the actual building.
- There are many tags used that are not defined, like "building:part:vertical passage:floor ...
12017-11-05 13:03:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
this edit (and some more changesets) contains quite a number of mistakes:
- Several of the building polygons have an invalid geometry, they must not intersect with themselves.
- In aerial images I can't see some of the structures, and some existing features that were already mapped you have d...
12017-11-02 09:33:08 UTCmueschel 'd:t:l' what's the meaningof that? - your tagging scheme gets more and more complicated.
22017-11-19 16:52:19 UTCyopaseopor Was a test, because the cache of my JOSM was not clean. The tagging scheme is being consistent (no big changes since one year ago), and the tests via JOSM/Vespucci preset , JOSM style or kendzi3d pluggin are successful. When the test finish (only miss aerial panels backwards in some roads) I will ma...
12017-11-02 09:23:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag 'mb:scale' to 18 ways - could you correct the spelling? 'mtb:scale'

Cheers, Jan
12017-11-02 09:13:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks llike you added the tag 'add:state' to all these 3000 nodes. Correct spelling would be 'addr:state'. Could you fix this?
Actually, this tag is not needed, the state can be determined from boundary relations which exist for all states.
jan
12017-11-01 07:20:17 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello markscalf. Hmm, i think something went wrong within this changesets ... 4,226 nodes with strange keys, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5203107962
I think you should review your changes ;-)
22017-11-01 09:20:58 UTCmueschel I deleted these nodes - most of them do not correspond to any structure on the ground, and they do not have any common OSM tag.
32017-11-01 15:20:44 UTCmarkscalf :( Was correcting some building alignments near the new arena and when I submitted them I noticed the 4000+ changes. I canceled the upload and wasn't aware that these actually stuck. My apologies. Thanks for your help reverting.
12017-10-31 10:40:45 UTCmueschel Du hast hier in die Flughafenschleife einen ziemlichen Knick eingebaut & die neue Lage der Gleise deckt sich auch nicht mit Luftbildern vor dem Tunnel:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5200894041
22017-10-31 22:19:18 UTCbigbug21 Guter Punkt, da hab ich tatsächlich etwas übersehen. Das ganze ist nun korrigiert und auch der östliche Teil der Schleife anhand von Daten aus dem DB-Open-Data-Portal präzisiert. Diese Daten stehen, nach Geojosn umgewandelt, vorübergehend unter
https://wetransfer.com/downl...
12017-10-30 16:13:22 UTCmueschel Hallo, was meinst du denn mit dem Tag "System=306" an diesen 36 Strommasten? So etwas gibt es in der OSM-Datenbank bis jetzt nicht.
Gruß, Jan
22017-10-30 16:31:56 UTCklausx Hallo Jan, ich habe diese Bezeichnung im Vorfeld öfter gefunden und daher verwendet. Bei Taginfo hatte ich auch nichts dazu gefunden. Eigentlich ist es die Bezeichung für die Liniennummer. Hier also Stromleitung Nr. 306, Mast Nr. 36. Gruß Klaus
32017-10-30 17:23:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
dann sollte das wohl als ref an die Stromleitung selbst: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352093529
42017-10-30 21:17:35 UTCklausx Moin, also nur an die Stromleitung und nichts an den Masten ? Hätte jetzt gedacht das die Masten ja zur Leitung gehören und dort auch die Leitungsnummer mit reingehört. Aber wenn es so sein soll schmeiße ich es wieder raus. Gruß Klaus
12017-10-30 12:09:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several ways with many foreign tags - this looks like a mistake. Could you have a look and fix this?
For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536405582
Cheers, Jan
22017-10-30 12:21:01 UTCjeslop Oops, sorry. I have already corrected them. Thanks for warning.
12017-10-29 13:05:17 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen beim "aktiven" mappen. :-)

Hast du zufällig noch ein paar mehr Informationen zu dieser Ladestation?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
z.B. "kostenlos" wäre fee=no
22017-10-30 15:55:42 UTCmrcylinder So, habe mich nochmal daran versucht und das "Kostenlos" und Kapazität eingefügt.
12017-10-28 18:10:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "road_closed" to one way - this tag is not used in other places, could you explain it?
Thanks, Jan
12017-10-28 13:35:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node? The tagging seems wrong:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5181712102

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-28 16:19:56 UTCCz ja Hallo. Thank you for information. I do not know how this happened. I fixed it.
Regards.
12017-10-28 13:33:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
why did you change so many tags on this node to lower case? The upper case version is used in OSM hundreds of times, the lower case is new.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1917823504

Cheers, Jan
12017-10-28 13:06:38 UTCmueschel Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags - just corrected 2 different misspellings (and several more yesterday) of 'implicit' on several ways.
22017-10-29 06:22:41 UTCandygol Thank you very much for correction of my typos 🙏. I will be more attentive in the future.
12017-10-27 17:36:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several ways that look like boundaries, but have many strange tags that are not used anywhere. I'm also pretty sure that the source of this data is not a 'survey'. Please have a look and correct the tagging and give the real source of this data.

Thanks, Jan
22017-10-28 09:01:38 UTCbbroy13 Hi there,
Thanks for your mail. Actually before that day there was no proper administrative boundary of chittagong. I got a admin a boundary from chittagong city corporation. I tried to integrate that in osm server. I thought its necessary to have proper admin boundary. For accuracy issue thi...
32017-10-28 12:50:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
thanks for the reply. You say that you got some data from "chittagong city corporation". Did you check the license this data is subject to? All data has to fit to the ODbL of OSM, otherwise it can not be added.
Second, if you add data from an external source, you have to be aware of ...
12017-10-28 12:42:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added about 70 buildings with tags like "bulding", "bulding:material", "bulding:roof" and so on. Please note the correct spelling is "building". I'm just fixing this now, please watch out for such spelling mistakes in the future.
Cheers, Jan
12017-10-27 18:30:16 UTCmueschel Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags - just corrected 4 different misspellings of 'implicit' on several ways.
12017-10-27 17:40:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag 'lli' on 3 ways, e.g. http://osm.org/way/112544733
his looks like a spelling mistake, did you mean 'lit'?

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-27 18:42:37 UTCaappeexx Yes it is my mistake.I fixed it.
12017-10-26 06:41:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Also, our database in case sensitive, all keys have to be in lower case (with
very few exceptions). Please have a look to the OSM Wiki to find ou...
12017-10-26 06:40:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. Please have a look to the OSM Wiki to find out which tags are in use.


E.g. here you added the tag Dịch vụ = Có giao hàng t...
12017-10-26 06:34:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many objects with the tag "building:condion". Could you have a look and correct the spelling? It should be "building:condition:

Thanks, Jan
22017-11-04 11:05:59 UTCHarald Hartmann And because NeemaAlphonce, Grace Lugoba and you have the same missspelling, do you use some JOSM Preset?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53206472
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53390039
12017-10-26 06:33:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many objects with the tag "building:condion". Could you have a look and correct the spelling? It should be "building:condition:

Thanks, Jan
22017-11-04 11:05:07 UTCHarald Hartmann And because elly_vick, Grace Lugoba and you have the same missspelling, do you use some JOSM Preset?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53236939
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53390039
12017-10-26 06:32:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. It looks like you uploaded some data from an external source here. First, all these objects do need a proper tag to describe what they are.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. Please h...
22017-10-26 12:41:59 UTCwoodpeck Jonathan, I am sorry but I will have to remove this un-discussed and badly tagged import. Please check with the "imports" mailing list to get support in doing this right.
32017-10-26 12:43:53 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53262481 where the changeset comment is: remove what appears to be a 3D structure import
12017-10-25 13:05:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check this relation and change all these tags to some common OSM tagging format?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7666617

With the current scheme, the tagging is rather useless, because no OSM-related software can understand it.

Thanks, Jan
12017-10-24 18:59:27 UTCmueschel Danke für's überarbeiten der Oberfläche.
Hier muss ich aber nochmal nachhaken: Es sieht so aus, als hättest du hier direkt ein GPS-Track abgezeichnet - ich gehe aber mal davon aus, dass die Kurven und Knicke nur durch Fehler in der Ortung entstanden sind und der Weg nicht wirkli...
22017-10-24 20:35:35 UTCTourenbikerFKB mit width=1 ist das auch kein track, sondern sollte mit path gemappt werden. Bei schmalen Pfaden in Hanglage kommen solche Verläufe durchaus mal vor.
32017-10-25 16:22:10 UTCAndy_18 Hallo,

danke für die Rückmeldungen.

Die Tracks sind von mir selbst mit dem MTB gefahren / geschoben worden ;-)
Kann gut sein, da war ein größeres Matschloch.
Bilder habe ich leider keine gemacht, ich werde bei nächster Gelegenheit noch mal dort vorbeifahren, diesma...
42017-11-01 05:47:19 UTCAndy_18 Hallo,

der Wegverlauf ist wirklich so wie gezeichnet.
Da stehen einige Bäume und Büsche im (geraden) Weg.
12017-10-23 17:10:59 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast diesem Weg das Tag "surface=wood" gegeben - besteht der Boden hier tatsächlich aus Holz? Schau doch mal im Wiki ob du nicht etwas passenderes findest: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface
Gruß, Jan
22017-10-24 16:16:22 UTCAndy_18 Hallo Jan,

danke für den Hinweis.
War so nicht gewollt, und habe ich auch schon geändert.
12017-10-23 17:08:43 UTCmueschel Hallo,
heißt dieses Denkmal tatsächlich "Denkmal" oder ist es einfach ein Denkmal? Das "name" Tag darf nur für echte Namen verwendet werden, nicht für Objektbeschreibungen.
Gruß, Jan
22017-10-23 17:53:58 UTCRainerBielefeld Hallo, das ist ein WIP, ich versuche gerade, herauszubekommen, für was das Denkmal genau ist, dann wird der Platzhalter durch den echten Namen ersetzt.

Gruß, Rainer
12017-10-23 17:03:38 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hattest nach Feedback gefragt: Die Änderung sieht soweit gut aus. Ich hätte allerdings einen Knoten mit den Adressdaten übrig gelassen, diese ändert sich ja nicht.
Gruß, Jan
12017-10-23 10:59:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain this tag?
Γηπεδο = Γηπεδο πλαταιων
http://osm.org/way/171463369
Tags should always be in English and documented in the wiki - automatic translation is not really he...
22017-10-24 16:16:54 UTCfreebeer Hi Jan,
Based on a similar entry on page 2 below starting with Γηπεδο and as a sports pitch, I think it was intended to be name=
and is simply a mistake.
(My greek is poor enough to imPEDE my understanding ;-)
32017-10-24 17:13:17 UTCnikasth hi from Nikas Th
Γήπεδο = football field
gipedo = football field
γιπεδο Μπασκετ = basketball court
12017-10-22 13:02:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag 'poped' here on 3 ways. Looks like a spelling mistake - what does it mean?
Cheers, Jan
22017-10-22 13:15:31 UTCeggie Hi Jan,

No idea.. It's not my tag.. I changed the serviceroad into cycleway and added the new cycleways here.
Let's have a look in the wiki :)
32017-10-22 13:20:13 UTCeggie I opied the cyclewaytag from a nearby G11 cycleway. I 'll remove the tag anyway. Last week I reverted the whole changeset because a mapper gluwed the man_made bridge at the Tramdijk.
42017-10-22 13:22:35 UTCmueschel Strange -
it wasn't in the database before. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423004658/history
Maybe it is a misspelling of 'moped'?
52017-10-22 13:29:59 UTCeggie No explanation.. anyway It's gone now :)
I noticed it before and I think's it a mispell of "moped". So it was my own tag. Thanks..
62017-10-22 13:32:16 UTCeggie I 'm saving money for a new keyboard.. copied is now..opied.
12017-10-22 13:07:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 14 nodes with tags 'decription' and 'desription'. Could you please fix this spelling mistake?
Jan
22017-10-23 08:12:30 UTCMichaelCollinson Jan, Thank you for point this out. 7 corrected. 7 appear to be spelt correctly - no change made.
12017-10-22 08:30:05 UTCmueschel May I point out that the proposal for these new tags was rejected?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions

Please don't do large scale retaggings to a not accepted tagging scheme.

Btw. source=survey is most likely wrong.
22017-10-22 08:41:07 UTCViking81 Those hydrants were tagged by me with different tags for the same attribute. Now I try to uniform them, so tomorrow when we will have an approved proposal, it will be easy to change them, if needed.
Meanwhile, please look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensi...
12017-10-21 13:33:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added this tag to a node:
Transport/auto = Lavage
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419305176
Is this a place to wash a car? The correct tag is "amenity = car_wash" for this. Could you change this?
Cheers, Jan
12017-10-21 08:00:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
some of this hydrants you added here are added 3 times.Could you clean this up?
Also, some of them have a Russian tag "Адрес" could you change this to a common English tag?

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-21 08:28:43 UTCKonon51 Здравствуйте. Гидранты которые я ошибочно добавил 3 раза, я удалил. Я проверю ещё раз. Укажите какие именно теги на русском языке надо исправить. Спасибо.
32017-10-21 08:45:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
thanks for replying. The tag I refer to is "Адрес"

Like here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5176124358
There are 12 nodes in total: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/swa

Jan
12017-10-20 11:12:33 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier an ein paar Schildern das Tag "arrow:direction" verwendet, das es bisher nicht gibt.
Ich schlage vor, das auf 'destination:arrow' zu ändern, wie es zusammen mit destination-Tags schon einige Male verwendet wird.
Gruß, Jan
22017-10-23 15:49:31 UTCHarald Hartmann Wobei man es gar nicht braucht, da es z.B. auch programmatisch errechnet werden kann, wie man an
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinationsign/example/index.htm#node=11768066
sieht ;-)
12017-10-19 21:10:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check some of the buildings you added? 30 got the tag "building levels = ..." which should be "building:levels". Could you fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-10-18 13:56:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you invented a new tag here, "NBI Struture number', including spelling mistakes. I think that a tag following established tagging schemes would be bette4, e.g. ref:nbi. What do you think?

Jan
12017-10-18 12:53:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
what do you mean by 'cycles' here? Bicycle or motorcycle?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532650535#map=16/-37.8383/145.6264

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-18 23:39:26 UTCcleary I have changed tag to "bicycle" - was my error. Thanks for noticing and bringing it to my attention.
12017-10-18 12:43:00 UTCmueschel There is someone producing stones working in this place? Please check the wiki what tags mean:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft
12017-10-18 10:02:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way, it got a strange tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75538450#map=19/50.83167/5.89233

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-18 10:28:15 UTCAllroads Done, renamed, thanks.
12017-10-17 19:18:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded more than 50 buildings with the t "builing". Could you have a look and fix this spelling mistake?

Cheers, Jan
12017-10-17 19:17:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded more than 60 buildings with the t "bulding". Could you have a look and fix this spelling mistake?

Cheers, Jan
12017-10-16 17:37:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84501093
"16=Le Cercle Pointu" looks like a wrong tag.
Cheers, Jan
12017-10-16 10:45:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the surface tag here?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217793776

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-16 11:39:15 UTCCz ja Thanks! My mistake, I corrected it. Regards.
12017-10-15 15:41:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4690323989
What is the meaning of this tag: "name:தமqbaylitழ்", I haven't seen this before.

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-15 15:47:04 UTCNeechalkaran corrected
12017-10-15 11:05:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the tag " prpois:barrio"? This hasn't been used before. To me it looks like it could be something like "addr:suburb".

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-16 15:05:06 UTCvramirez122000 Puerto Rico Municipalities are divided into "barrios". These POIs were geocoded using a simple scheme of Road# KM. The barrio field was used to manually validate the quality of the geocode. That was the theory anyway. In a few cases, the Road KM was just an "idea" of more or less...
12017-10-15 11:02:34 UTCmueschel Hallo,
das Tag "service:bicycle:..." ist nicht dazu gedacht, alle möglichen Dinge aufzulisten die man kaufen kann. Dafür gibt es z.B. brand=
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand

Gruß, Jan
12017-10-15 10:53:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check these edits? E.g. I can't find this 200 meter long house on any satellite images. The street also seems to be in a different position.
Thanks, Jan
12017-10-15 10:48:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
you invented some new tags here:
|ODS \t=true
|ODS:secondaryaddress =false
Could you explain there meaning? Or where they added by mistake?

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-15 16:36:00 UTCJanWandelaar They are there by mistake.
I forgot to delete them.
12017-10-15 10:39:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used 3 shop tags here, which do not have any of the common values. Please check the wiki to find some matching tags - free-text values for shop tags are not supported by any OSM software.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop

Cheers, Jan
12017-10-13 07:33:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
I don't think that the OSM database is the right place to collect information on pot holes, using no established tags to describe them. Please co sider using a dedicates service for this, for example umap.

Jan
12017-09-14 10:16:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key 'ff' here - this looks like a spelling mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-11 19:47:06 UTCmtbbiker99 Maybe. I can not open 51679515. Can you fix it. Thanks and nice greetings from Oliver.
32017-10-12 07:45:18 UTCmueschel Unfortunately I don't know how to fix it - it looks like a second osmc:symbol:

ff = black:black:white_triangle_line
osmc:symbol = yellow:black:yellow_diamond
12017-10-11 14:48:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
was hat es denn mit diesem Gebiet auf sich?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531321377
"original=yes" ist wenig aussagekräftig.
Jan
12017-10-11 12:22:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used tags like 'maxspeed:forward:hgv' here - the tag normally used is 'maxspeed:hgv:forward' - first the transportation mode, then the direction. Would you mind changing that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-11 12:24:49 UTCdaltux Sure, will do, thanks
12017-10-11 09:50:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added all these nodes with Russian keys and tags - please change them to usual OSM tags like they are documented in the wiki. Currently all these tags can not be used by any software.

Jan
22017-10-12 14:25:40 UTCHarald Hartmann And please check
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5155432278
and it's duplicate
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5155321352
12017-10-11 09:48:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several areas with only foreign tags and no common OSM tags. E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530774417
The actual suburb is already existing in OSM and mapped properly.

Jan
22017-10-15 10:02:57 UTCChrissW-R1 Please have a look at the already existing data!
You added the boundary of Yedikule again and again. But there is already one with right tagging:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7648813
Also please reuse the already existing nodes with the same position. This changesets looks like automat...
12017-10-11 09:44:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of "bushwood=yes" here?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530779340
This tag is new. Maybe natural=wood?
Jan
12017-10-11 09:41:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
du hast hier 'surface' entfernt und durch "descriptio1 \tLärmschutzwand" ersetzt:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25465819
War das ein Versehen?
Gruss, Jan
22017-10-11 20:33:14 UTCbigbug21 Ja, das war es. Danke für den Tipp.
12017-10-10 07:32:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added this tag on several ways:
access:lanes:conditional = ||designated @ (Mo-Fr 05:30-09:00)
I guess this should be 'no' instead of 'designated' as the lane is closed to non-psv traffic.

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-17 12:05:16 UTCKelerei Thanks for the heads-up! Fixed in changeset #53009624.
12017-10-08 16:24:49 UTCmueschel Hallo,
deine Ergänzungen sehen auf den ersten Blick gut aus. Eine Anmerkung habe ich aber: Du hast die Position der Gebäude nach Bing-Bildern verschoben - diese scheinen hier aber leider einen Versatz zu haben, d.h. die Position hat vorher besser gestimmt. Tipp: Schau dir die Gegend nochm...
12017-10-08 16:16:35 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM. Die Ergänzung von "hgv=yes" wäre nicht notwendig gewesen - Straßen sind zunächst einmal frei, nur Ausnahmen von der Regel (z.B. eine Wohnstraße auf der keine LKW fahren dürfen) müssen extra angegeben werden.
Und: Bitte verwe...
12017-10-08 13:26:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
are you sure that this really is a "viewing point"? On mapillary, this looks like a small rock, but not like a place where you can enjoy the view across a landscape.
12017-10-07 03:30:31 UTCelifz SOURCE: Mapillary
COMS2200A
22017-10-08 13:19:13 UTCmueschel Please be careful where to put tags. This way is definitely not a waste_basket, but some kind of footway.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377683291
12017-10-08 13:18:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
please have a look to the tagging here, this tag doesn't make much sense:
"collection_times = Cigarette disposal"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5136595692
12017-10-07 03:29:40 UTCelifz Source: Mapillary
COMS2200A
22017-10-08 13:16:31 UTCmueschel Please be careful where to put tags. This building is definitely not a "amenity=bench", but a building.
Cheers, Jan
12017-10-08 13:15:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're adding very detailed information here:
recycling:Coffee_cups_(wax_lined)=yes
recycling:Food_soiled_pizza_boxes=yes
recycling:Other_soiled_paper_products=yes
recycling:Tissues_and_paper_towels_(soiled_or_clean)=yes

Unfortunately, this is not how OSM tags work. The key can not conta...
12017-10-04 12:49:01 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello Chrisss Gü. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64095894
you have tagged
`abandonend:leisure` instead of
`abandoned:leisure`, right?
#typo
22017-10-07 17:56:51 UTCmueschel Und am Weg http://osm.org/way/191293352 hast du zwei neue access Tags erfunden,
access:official = no
access:physical = yes
Was möchtest du damit ausdrücken?
Gruß, Jan
32017-10-11 21:02:07 UTCChrisss Gü na prinzipiell steht da ein Schild dass das Betreten aufgrund möglicher Gefahren infolge der Braunkohletagebaue nicht betreten werden darf. Da er aber mitten im Wohngebiet liegt, rege genutzt wird, nicht wie sonst hier üblich mit Zaun versperrt ist und ein asphaltierter Radweg ist, hab ich...
12017-10-04 12:59:15 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello Yuuki Satou. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3784811219 you have introduced the new key `banner_url`. What is it for? Or is it some SEO-Spam? Then please remove it! #newkey
22017-10-04 15:19:30 UTCfreebeer Also,
name Musée de cote d'ivoire
name:en Musée de cote d'ivoireも
The ``english'' name is in french and in addition contains a non-US-ASCII trailing symbol. I do not know the correct proper name, but a translation could be ``Ivory Coast Museum'' or similar.
And,
...
32017-10-07 17:54:47 UTCmueschel 'banner_url' was not added on purpose. That is an old bug in maps.me that has been fixed since a long time.
12017-10-06 09:41:22 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello mdelatorre. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425224332
you have tagged
`Vega del Heno`.
What is it for? Please keep in mind: keys should be in english ;-)
22017-10-07 11:15:36 UTCmueschel That's a copy and paste error of the name. Fixed it according to source of this changeset.
32017-10-12 05:07:48 UTCmdelatorre My mistake. It was a residential street as you have already fixed. :-)
12017-10-06 11:09:30 UTCmueschel Servus,
den Key 'no_stopping' gibt es bis jetzt nicht. Das geht mit parking:lane = no_stopping.

Grüße, Jan
22017-10-06 13:43:53 UTCgeri-oc Habe es so geändert - obwohl ich es "einfach" einfacher finde, auch für die Auswertung.
PS: habe auch das no_parking "umgemodelt".
Gruß Gerd
12017-10-06 10:54:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "smoothness:lanes" on 10 roads.
On two-way roads, it should be smoothness:lanes:forward or smoothness:lanes:backward. Just :lanes can only be used on oneway streets. Would you mind changing this, as I don't know which lane your tag refers to.

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-06 11:04:01 UTCsamuelrussell Cheers. Can fix. I remember mapping all the lanes left to right in the direction of the way, so easy to split into :forward…
12017-10-05 19:00:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
du hast hier das Tag
"maxspeed:condition = Mo-Fr 07:00-17:00" verwendet. Das müsste zum einen "conditional" heißen und es fehlt die Angabe, welche Geschwindigkeit im angegebenen Zeitraum gilt.
Korrekte Schreibweise wäre beispielsweise:

maxspeed:conditi...
12017-10-03 13:06:56 UTCmueschel Hallo Carsten,
du hast hier an 11 Ladestationen das Tag "socket:type:output=22000" verwendet - das gibt es so nicht. 'type' müsste gegen den jeweiligen Steckertyp ausgetauscht werden. Außerdem würde ich empfehlen, die Werte als "22kW" zu schreiben, das macht es e...
22017-10-03 20:27:57 UTCCarsten Güse Hallo Jan,
ich habe mich eigentlich nur an die JOSM-Vorlage (Transport/Auto/Elektrotankstelle) und dessen Wiki-Beschreibung gehalten:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=charging_station

Dort gibt es den Tag "socket:type:output=Watt - die Leistung dieses Steckers". Wie h...
32017-10-03 21:10:18 UTCCarsten Güse Nachtrag:
In der weiteren Beschreibung der Ladestation soll tatsächlich die Leistung in kW angegeben werden. Das setzt sich in den Beispielen fort. Generell also: Wert + Einheit.
Allerdings steht bei der Stromstärke "amperage" nur ein Wert, z. B. "32".Also ohne Einhei...
42017-10-04 08:23:47 UTCmueschel Bei socket:type:output schau mal genau hin, 'type' ist kursiv gesetzt, soll also ersetzt werden. Deswegen auch det Hinweis dabei 'es kann mehrere Typen geben', dann braucht es diese Unterscheidung. Bei Einheiten: einfach mit angeben, dann ist klar was gemeint ist. kW ist aber die gängigste.
Gr...
52017-10-04 10:12:41 UTCCarsten Güse Ist beides geändert.
Danke für den Hinweis.
Gruß Carsten
12017-10-03 17:10:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the new tag "pick-your-own=yes" on some nodes - I suggest to use the widely used key "self_service" instead.
Cheers, Jan
22017-10-03 18:26:27 UTCfreebeer Hallo,
I have not checked the uses for self_service, but I see it as different from pick-your-own as I know it:
self-service as I understand is where produce has been picked, but you obtain it from an unattended stand, with no fixed opening hours or other complications.
Which is different from my...
32017-10-03 19:21:36 UTCmueschel self_service is used on e.g. fuel stations, do-it-yourself workshops or canteens without waiters.

Yes, sure there is a difference, but it should be clear what it means due to the landuse =farmland. If the berries were already picked, you would put a node and tag it as shop.

self_service = yes...
42017-10-10 04:46:35 UTCDevonF It's nice to re-use keys and not create new ones, but I think freebeer makes a good point. Self_service=* is a little too ambiguous and there are many possible combinations of tags to be able to easily exhaustively search them. For example it could be applied to landuse=orchards, farmland, greenhous...
12017-10-03 17:08:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this building? roof:shape_1 =50 looks like a mistake.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263460985

Cheers, Jan
12017-10-03 13:17:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
is "Карка-Шур" the name of this stream?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211515586

Jan
22017-10-03 16:08:01 UTCBSV9 Hi !
Thank you for the error message. Correct name is "Каркашур". I fixed it.
12017-10-03 13:03:40 UTCmueschel Kannst du hier mal nach den Daten der Landebahnen schauen? Die ref an den Bahnen scheint nicht zu stimmen.
Und das Tag 'apro' an diesem Node ist auch neu (hatte ich zwischenzeitlich fälschlicherweise geändert in 'apron')
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5089791109/history

Gruß,...
12017-09-16 11:41:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? Something went wrong with the ref tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521142317
"X622=S285"

Thanks, Jan
22017-10-03 08:41:01 UTCCENTRALHUB The secondary road (X622 you mentioned) should be the old S285.

The new S285 (the primary road) is newly built, but is not fully completed on the map yet.

Several online map in China tag both of them as S285.

Once we finish the primary road I believe that we can remove the ref tag from th...
32017-10-03 09:52:38 UTCmueschel Thanks for replying,
If I understand right, we can change the tag ""X622=S285" to "old_ref = S285", "ref = X622"?
42017-10-03 16:46:04 UTCCENTRALHUB I think we should only do "old_ref=S285", because we cannot confirm that it's X622.
12017-09-22 08:48:51 UTCwoodpeck Hello PC10, these data imports are faulty (they introduce bad keys and they have over-noded, pseudo-precise geometries that seem to come from converting a raster map to vectors). Before you import anything more, please consult the import guidelines at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidel...
22017-09-22 10:23:14 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52269395, 52270300, 52269682, 52271305, 52270647, 52271642, 52270992, 52268780, 52269993, 52269109 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from PC10, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52...
32017-10-02 18:54:42 UTCmueschel Hi PC10, hi woodpeck,
there are many more nodes and areas imported since, including newly invented tags (aream2, LCC, proyecto, ...). It also seems that most features do not correspond to actual features in the satellite images - e.g. forest multipolygons have the largest trees excluded, borders do...
42017-10-04 08:23:23 UTCwoodpeck Yes they should. We know nothing about the source - it is claimed that there's some community project - but the data suffers from geometry anomalies and bad tagging and the import hasn't been discussed. I am deleting the data now and have asked PC10 to discuss any further plans on the imports list.
12017-10-02 18:34:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please explain the meaning of alt_name:mcm? :mcm is the language code of Malaccan Creole Portuguese, which is very unlikely to be spoken in Moscow.
Jan
22017-10-02 18:51:51 UTCevgenykatyshev Hi. This tags was imorted by Moscow Transport Department. I first removed all ща them but later revert deletetion for end of discussion. Russian community is discussing about this data on forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php
12017-10-02 09:38:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
on 71 nodes you added some new keys:
is_in:dist=Ilam
is_in:vdc=Shantipur
These are not used in other places. I guess that the first one can be replaced with the more common is_in:district; but I don't know what to the second key refers to. Could you check this?

Cheers, Jan

22017-10-02 11:08:12 UTCWojtekK Hello Jan, right - is_in:dist will be replaced with is_in:district, VDC is shortcut for Nepal administrative unit (Village Development Comitee).
12017-10-01 10:58:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
is there a difference between disabled_motor_vehicle and disabled_vehicle, or do they describe the same category?
Jan
22017-10-01 12:44:26 UTCAllroads The hierarchy is disabled_vehicle, then subcategory disabled_ motor_ vehicle,
The wiki is not completed but C9 C15, disabled_vehicle, C13 disabled_motor_vehicle ( not a moped), C14, new key needed. Subcatergory, should be a not motorized disabled vehicle as a key ( i do not have yet found a logi...
32017-10-01 13:47:28 UTCmueschel Alright, I wasn't sure if this difference was a mistake or on purpose.
Thanks, Jan
12017-09-20 15:34:14 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello Tomas Straupis. E.g. at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4325643440 you have add the new (and so far unkown and undocumented) key `subitem`. What is it for? #newkey
22017-09-21 07:13:01 UTCTomas Straupis It is a „test/temporary“ tag. What I'm trying to solve is this: there are a number of points tagged as historic=memorial in one small area while in practice it is one big memorial. I'm trying to filter out micro-mapped memorials. subitem=yes helps with this filtering, but I'm not fully h...
32017-10-01 11:05:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
additional point: Please don't use the name tag for description, like here:
name =Memorialas
name:de =Gedenkstätte
name:en =Memorial
name:pl =Miejsce pamięci

It is sufficient to use historic = memorial and its subtags to describe the object in a machine-readable way.
42017-10-01 11:29:06 UTCTomas Straupis Hi, I did not not add these pointless names. Previous editor Jay May did. I'm still thinking of a good way of removing these points altogether (or reducing to something less prominent like tourism=artwork).
12017-10-01 10:53:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way and the adjacent one?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135636085

The key "nb_marches" looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22017-10-03 17:26:07 UTCgsimon Thanks, I fixed. Gaël
12017-09-30 11:29:48 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ist das hier wirklich ein Radweg mit blauem Schild? Wenn du ihn als highway=cycleway einträgst, heißt das, dass hier weder Fußgänger, noch Traktoren noch Pferde erlaubt sind. Ist das vor Ort wirklich so?

Gruß, Jan
12017-09-30 09:45:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please explain your edits on hotels? The changeset comment should contain some reasonable description of what you did.

The source you give doesn't exist. "mapk.in" is an empty web page.


In other changesets, you added the same objects several times, e.g. http://www.o...
22017-09-30 15:02:19 UTCcat_crash Hi,
we are piloting on integration OSM with our cloud solution helps venues keep OSM data up-to-date.
New key will be introduced in accordance with process or removed after piloting. Please notice - we are piloting only on 2 venues. No any mass loads will be done
12017-09-22 11:21:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you give some details on this restriction? "except = Transit vehicle" is not a common tag, and there is a stray ':' in 'restriction'.
Who is allowed to turn here?

Jan
22017-09-29 11:27:14 UTCIqhra Hi Jan,
Thanks for getting back I have been adding the restriction using street level imagery and the board below is stating that it is not allowed to take u turn except transit vehicles. So I went ahead and tagged them following what I see what I map. It would be great if local knowledge mappers...
32017-09-29 11:49:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
thanks for replying. That is 'transit' as in 'public transit'? (Sorry, I'm not from the US and don't know terminology..). That would be "except = bus", which is buses used in public transit, but not coaches.
Jan
42017-10-01 07:43:06 UTCIqhra Hi,
Thanks for getting back. I tagged it based on the sign board i see in the street level imagery ( even I am not form US). It would be great if you can go ahead and make changes as per your knowledge if it needs any correction.
regards,
Iqhra
12017-09-29 10:42:57 UTCmueschel Hallo,
"tracktype track=detached" ist kein gängiges Tag - was möchtest du damit ausdrücken?
Gruß, Jan
22017-09-29 17:31:37 UTCgeocodec Danke für den Hinweis, ein Makro meines Logitech G13 Gamepad macht aktuell Probleme.
12017-09-29 10:28:34 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du schreibst hier
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5110955621
parkin_space =disused

Meinst du vielleicht capacity:disabled?
Jan
12017-09-29 08:21:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check the tags on this hospital?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481184320
All keys have to be in English as they are described in the Wiki. I guess you meant to add health_specialty tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0/Specialties

C...
12017-09-29 08:16:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these nodes have only foreign tags and no tags that are common to OSM. Where they uploaded by mistake?

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-29 18:58:35 UTCHarald Hartmann Or is it an import?
12017-09-26 10:26:46 UTCmueschel Hi samuel,
the key "ups" is new - could you explain its meaning?
The key "ramp:pram" is new as well.

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-26 11:25:38 UTCsamuelrussell Cheers mate for your work.

ramp:pram is a cultural error on my part. The ramps are called "pram ramps" in Australian road design, and the regular tag "ramp:stroller" is an Americanism. I will of course correct to common usage. It obviously represents a vehicle access suitabil...
12017-09-26 10:16:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you have used the tag "school way = yes" on this area and some buildings - could you explain the meaning? It is not a common tag. If this is a school, the correct tag is "amenity = school".
Cheers, Jan
12017-09-08 10:31:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some tags like psv:turn:lanes here. I think this should be turn:psv:lanes.

The main key is turn (you want to tag turn lanes), and the transportation mode is "psv". This is the same order like e.g. in maxspeed:hgv

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-25 18:33:36 UTCVentlan Hello,
you might be right, though I could not find any documentation regarding this kind of combination of tags. I will need to think about it.
Regards.
32017-09-25 18:48:11 UTCmueschel Comprehensive documentation is really a problem. In general the order for almost all tags is:
key[:subkey][:hgv|:bicycle|...][:lanes][:forward|:backward|:both_ways][:conditional]

I tried to compile a summary of keys and possible suffixes, but I didn't take the time to translate it to English yet...
42017-09-30 19:19:32 UTCVentlan Ok, all changed, thanks for bringing it up.
12017-09-24 10:14:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node? Is "Bottu" the name? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5091549514

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-24 10:33:09 UTCSL_Mapper Yes, invalid key corrected.

Thanks.
12017-09-22 20:19:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
willkommen bei OSM!
Zwei Anmerkungen zu deiner Änderung habe ich: Die Breite hast du als "1,5" angegeben - OSM verwendet die englische Schreibweise mit Punkt als Dezimaltrenner.

Und: motorcar \t= agricultural stand vorher schon da - das klingt komisch, normalerweise stehen a...
22017-09-23 18:12:37 UTCAlibaer Danke für den Hinweis mit den 1.5 Metern.
Die zweite Bemerkung mit dem motorcar....verstehe ich nicht. Was müsste ich verwenden, wenn es ein geteerter Weg ist, auf dem kein Auto fahren kann/ darf, aber kein Straßenschild mit den von dir genannten Zahlen angebracht ist?
32017-09-23 18:29:20 UTCmueschel Hier kannst du dir das zusammenstellen:
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
"motorcar" ist in der Regel zu speziell, weil z.B. Lastwagen, Motorräder und Taxis nicht eingeschlossen sind. "motorisierter Verkehr" wäre "motor_vehicle".
42017-09-23 18:34:30 UTCAlibaer Ich werde mit das Morgen noch mal anschauen. Ich bin mir aber ziemlich sicher, dass kein Schild angebracht ist, aber ich habe noch nie ein Auto gesehen, dass da gefahren wäre, für größere Fahrzeuge wäre der Weg zu schmal. Gruß Albert
12017-09-23 18:00:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "emigrated = yes' on these buildings - this tag is not common, could you explain its meaning?
Btw, please do not add "building=yes" on nodes, only on the way representing the shape.

Jan
12017-09-23 17:51:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tags "phone:fr" and "fax:fr" on several nodes - these are not common. Is there any specific reason to mention a language code on the phone number? E.g. is there another number answered in English?
12017-09-23 11:24:30 UTCmueschel Hallo,
für welchen Zeitraum ist hier gesperrt? Bei ~Monaten ist es besser, mit "temporary" zu arbeiten, sonst kann es zu späteren Problemen mit Anwendungen kommen die ihre Daten nur selten aktualisieren, oder wenn vergessen wird die Sperrung wieder aufzuheben. Siehe https://wik...
12017-09-23 11:21:33 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM!

access \tprivate
highway \tservice
maxspeed \t20
name \tSpielstrasse

Welche Schilder stehen da genau an der Straße? Nach deinem Tagging müsste da ein 20 km/h Schild stehen. Ist das wirklich so?
Auch wenn dort ein Schild "Privatweg" steht, is...
12017-09-22 20:32:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of this tag?
Building:ele - this has not been used before and is not documented.
Building:wall_mat - this tag is also unknown and should be "building:material" - would you mind changing this to the common tag?

Cheers, Jan
12017-09-22 11:23:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
what do you mean with this key? "recycling:books_&_music"? Is it a public open bookshelf?
Jan
22017-09-22 14:11:50 UTCmanof25 Hi,
This recycling bin is for people to deposit books and CDs/DVDs. No these bins are not bookshelves.
32017-09-22 14:31:32 UTCmueschel Alright, according to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/recycling#similar
The common tags for this are recycling:books and recycling:cds.
12017-09-22 11:31:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the leaf_type and leef_type tags here?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522360942
Jan
12017-09-22 11:28:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
was heißt denn "phonezx"?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5088455542
22017-10-15 16:45:45 UTCDeus Figendi Das ist eine gute Frage, vielleicht habe ich mich da irgendwie vertippt oder mein Telefon. Wenn es mir nicht einfällt kann ich das auch löschen.
32017-10-16 12:15:57 UTCfreebeer Und warum name=Sitzbank ?
Das kennt man schon von amenity=bench ...
Oder heisst es dreimal offiziell Sitzbank?
12017-09-20 10:46:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag "static = true" is new and not used in other places. Could you explain its meaning?

Thanks, Jan
12017-09-20 10:42:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM! Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags, I found several mistakes here like
"buillding" -> "building" or
"Building" -> "building" and some spaces in the key.

I fixed some mistakes, could you have another look and see i...
12017-09-19 10:55:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added these new tags to some nodes - could you explain there meaning?
UMR Espace Dev
UMR Espace-Dev

Jan
22017-09-19 11:04:07 UTCchris_seas Hi
It's just a test that i forget to delete. Thank you for your question.
Christophe
12017-09-19 10:47:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added these keys on 350 objects:
is_in_municipality, is_in_state.
The correct spelling is
is_in:municipality and is_in:state. Could you change this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-09-18 19:31:26 UTCmueschel Hallo Christoph,
du hast hier einen ganzen Stadtteil als Zahnarzt markiert. Ich mache diese Änderung mal rückgängig, bitte trage die Daten nochmal ein, an einem eigenen Knoten.

Gruß, Jan
12017-09-17 17:26:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
das Tag, das du hier verwendest ist ungewöhnlich. Meinst du vielleicht
man_made=street_cabinet
street_cabinet=telecom

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstreet_cabinet

Gruß, Jan
22017-09-17 17:59:04 UTCsha256_ Vielen Dank für deinen Tipp! Ich habs angepasst.
12017-09-17 16:26:03 UTCmueschel Hallo,
einen Verbesserungsvorschlag habe ich: Kannst du die Häuser genauso rechteckig machen wie sie es in Wirklichkeit sind? In iD geht das einfach mit der Taste "S".
Gruß, Jan
12017-09-16 19:00:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the phone numbers here? Copy and paste didn't work correctly.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521147281

Jan
22017-10-02 16:25:44 UTCHarald Hartmann And `Ramacca=Margherito`, too. What is it for?
32017-10-04 05:45:24 UTCAury88 WOW..I don't know what happened here. I copy-pasted the tag from a node to a closed way with JOSM and this is the first time this results in a mess (not knowing this could happen I didn't check ) . thank you guys for reporting to my attention all this
12017-09-16 15:37:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you clarify all the access tags here? They don't make too much sense. E.g. nobody is allowed to walk there, unless having a bicycle with them. Horses are allowed if they have permission by the owner.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521382389

And I also don't understand the meaning o...
12017-09-16 11:40:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check these two nodes, they both have a strange tag like "1-39 = 1-20"

Jan

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5077709852
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5077778453
12017-09-15 10:57:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
in this changeset you added some address tags - could you make sure that the key, e.g. "addr:دائرة" is in English, and one of the keys mentioned in the Wiki? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr

Cheers, Jan
12017-09-15 10:39:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used a new tag on these roads, "Kilátó sor" - could you explain its meaning? Keys should always be in English and should be documented in the wiki, so that people can understand and use them properly.

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-19 12:00:53 UTCTérképszerkesztő Hello Jan,
Thanks your observation, but it wasn't me.
Nevertheless I modified it, so it's proper now.
Greetings,
Térképszerkesztő
12017-09-15 08:48:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
here is a way with only foreign tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521034908
22017-09-15 09:32:59 UTCAlan Bragg deleted tags, added new
12017-09-14 14:26:31 UTCaharvey Hi!

The way you edited has 3 lanes only the left most is psv only, the rightmost two are normal.

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/1kH6wZEDjyV1ixlAPXtXDA

I've changed the tags over to use lanes:psv=designated|yes|yes, per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes#Description but still no...
22017-09-14 19:56:49 UTCmueschel Ah ok, this I couldn't see when reading the tags.
The correct tagging is:
vehicle:lanes = no | |
psv:lanes = designated | |

'lanes:psv' can only be used to mark that there is a psv lane, but doesn't tell anything about where it is.
32017-09-15 01:25:57 UTCaharvey Sorry you're right, thanks for that!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes:psv is only for marking out how many psv lanes exist, not where they are.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes#Lanes_reserved_for_specific_vehicles describes marking out where those psv lanes are.

I'...
12017-09-14 12:46:54 UTCtrigpoint What does GPB mean?
22017-09-14 18:26:51 UTCfreebeer GRRRRREAT Pr*>pop<*thudKLONK*itish bounds...
Has anybody seen me teeth?
32017-09-14 19:51:44 UTCmueschel Sure... it was "currency:gbp", I wanted to fix it to capital letters... and mixed them up. Thanks for pointing out!
Jan
12017-09-14 10:10:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
if this is a helipad, could you add the the common tag
aeroway = helipad?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5074826767

Thanks, Jan
22017-09-17 03:11:20 UTCRichard L Removed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52107954
Thanks for notifying.
12017-09-14 10:05:21 UTCmueschel Hallo,
schau doch bitte hier mal nach dem Tag " build:c = gate" - das verstehe ich nicht.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247068218
Gruß, Jan
12017-09-13 20:42:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
willkommen bei OSM! Das sieht für mich alles richtig erfasst aus (ob das Gebäude da wirklich steht kann ich mangles Ortskenntnis natürlich nicht bestätigen).
Gruß, Jan
12017-09-08 20:01:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
willkommen bei OSM! Ist das hier ein richtiger Kreisel mit Insel oder nur ein markierter mini_roundabout ohne Insel?
Im ersten Fall muss ein junction=roundabout an den runden Weg. Bei einem Kreisel ohne Insel sollte die gezeichnete Geometrie bei der normalen Kreuzung bleiben, nur der Kreuzung...
22017-09-12 16:29:17 UTCVingHS Hallo,
Dankeschön. Das wusste ich nicht, aber ich schaue es mir nochmal an. Es handelt sich nämlich nur um einen aufgemalten Kreisverkehr.
32017-09-12 18:44:15 UTCmueschel 👍 So sieht es gut aus. Die Mühe mit "direction" brauchst du dir eigentlich nicht machen, die normale Richtung lässt sich ja aus dem Land ableiten.
12017-09-12 08:17:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are two ways with many foreign tags, looks like a mistake:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523877443
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29690100

Jan
22017-09-12 08:18:48 UTCmueschel Here as well: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374691498
maybe there are more.
32017-09-12 11:03:52 UTCAlan Bragg Thanks, tags have been deleted.
Alan
12017-09-11 20:14:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
zwei Anmerkungen zu deinen Edits habe ich:
Häuser haben in der Regel rechte Winkel, bitte zeichne sie auch entsprechend. In iD, das Gebäude markieren und "S" drücken.
Außerdem gibt es jetzt hier einige Adressen doppelt und dreifach. Wenn du die Adresse an ein Ge...
12017-09-11 11:23:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you are using some new tags to describe fire hydrants. There is already an established scheme for tagging used thousands of times, including these tags:
fire_hydrant:coupling_type
fire_hydrant:couplings
fire_hydrant:pillar
fire_hydrant:type
fire_hydrant:wrench

See here for more:
https:...
22017-09-11 16:25:15 UTCsimone_girardelli Use automatic translation.

Hello mueschel,
tags you quoted are those of today in this page [0] there are changes with new tags, they replace some tags for hydrants or similar.
The page should be in the approval phase and a short (there is certainty) become predefined tags for the mapping of hyd...
32017-09-11 18:31:52 UTCmueschel There is no voting on this proposal yet. Please wait until it has been accepted before changing the tagging of existing nodes on a larger scale.
42017-09-11 19:51:22 UTCsimone_girardelli You speak italian? :)

Grant me a month, Meanwhile I am Italian mailing list, if from them I recommend to stay with old tags, up to the final vote, give to replace the tags.

Maybe someone intervenes in the comments of the changeset, let me also this, at the bottom it is to understand what tags ...
52017-09-11 20:10:40 UTCmueschel I'm fine with a new tagging scheme, but we have to keep in mind that this might break existing tools, that don't understand these tags yet.
62017-09-13 07:08:15 UTCmiox Hi. I agree with mueschel. Before changing the tagging scheme it had better to update the tools that use this data like osmhydrant and openfiremap.
72017-09-13 17:13:50 UTCsimone_girardelli Ciao, ho rimesso i vecchi tag, per favore controllate se è a osto, ho lasciato wrench=pentagonal, erchè mi pare un dettaglio aggiuntivo che non influisce.

Ciao e grazie per le vostre eventuali.
82017-09-15 13:53:44 UTCmiox Per me Ok
12017-09-11 19:49:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added pharamcy opening hours here using the key "pharmacy_hours" - this has not been used in any other place yet. What exactly is the intended meaning and difference to opening_hours?
Cheers, Jan
12017-09-10 11:15:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
zwei Anmerkungen habe ich: Du scheinst von den Bing-Bildern abgemalt zu haben - diese haben hier aber eine schlechte Qualität und auch einen Versatz von mehreren Metern. Schalte besser auf "Esri World Imagery" um, diese Bilder sind wesentlich besser.

Die Häuser sollten au...
12017-09-10 11:11:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
we do have the sidewalk key. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
If there is a sidewalk on both sides and both have the same surface the tagging would be

sidewalk = both
sidewalk:surface = asphalt

Jan
12017-09-10 10:08:25 UTCmueschel Moin,
willkommen bei OSM. In diesem Edit ist aber leider etwas schief gegangen. Die Straße führt jetzt mitten durch ein Haus und zwei Zäune. Wurde da irgendetwas abgerissen?

Beim Anschließen an den Zeilsheimer Weg hast du auch noch einen Knoten des Zauns mit verschoben.
\...
22017-09-10 12:18:29 UTCTourenbikerFKB Diverse Indizien deuten darauf hin, dass das Gebäude und der Zaun Geschichte sind. Ich war aber selber nicht dort und Abmalen gilt ja nicht :-)
32017-09-10 12:31:36 UTCTourenbikerFKB Hintergrundinfo: http://www.kreisblatt.de/lokales/main-taunus-kreis/Gewerbegebiet-wird-jetzt-erweitert;art676,2472625
42017-09-22 20:50:52 UTCcor73 Hallo DÄD, hier ist wohl noch mehr schief gelaufen, auch die komplette Fläche nordwestlich des Zeilsheimer Wegs heißt jetzt Tierheim Kelkheim, hier wurde aus landuse=farmland buildung=yes. Das habe ich mal korrigiert.

Das Bei einem Besuch vor Ort musste ich zudem feststellen, dass...
12017-09-10 10:02:13 UTCmueschel Dieses Museum heißt doch sicher nicht "Museum"? Und dieser Tag macht auch wenig Sinn: "Tabakspeicher = tourism=museum"

Gruß, Jan
22017-09-10 15:06:51 UTCRailAir Hallo Jan,
danke für den Hinweis. Ist jetzt behoben.
Gruß, Bernd
12017-09-09 14:42:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several objects with many strange tags like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520646055

ILCE_ADI = FATÄ°H
ILCE_ID = 12
MAHALLE_AD = KATÄ°P KASIM
MAHALLE_ID = 247
admn_level = 5
cdk_id = admr.istb.fatih.katip.kasim
ilce_lcase = Fatih
l...
12017-09-09 13:46:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast dem Feldweg die Tags
surface=unpaved und tracktype=grade1
gegeben. Das passt nicht zusammen, schau da mal ins Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype

Die ganzen Zusatztags wie mtb:* sind richtig aber eigentlich nicht nötig, solange d...
22017-09-09 16:23:12 UTCradler21 Danke für den Hinweis. Hab´s schon geändert.
gruß Wolfgang
12017-09-09 09:47:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
mit dem Verschieben von Objekten per Satellitenbild muss man vorsichtig sein. Gerade die "neuen" Bing Bilder, die es seit ein paar Monaten gibt haben einen großen Versatz. Also am besten immer mit den anderen verfügbaren Quellen abgleichen. Da wären die Bilder von Esri...
22017-09-10 18:34:38 UTCShmias können wir es in dem fall einfach rückgängig machen?
12017-09-08 19:57:20 UTCmueschel 👍 Alles richtig eingetragen. Mit JOSM als Editor lassen sich solche Beschränkungen einfacher bearbeiten.
12017-09-08 19:50:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
anstelle den Knoten zu löschen, kannst du ihn auch stehen lassen. Für leerstehende Läden haben wir den Tag "shop = vacant". Wenn die Gefahr besteht, dass andere die Schließung nicht mitbekommen haben und den POI wieder hinzufügen könnten - setz noch eine...
12017-09-08 19:39:41 UTCmueschel Hi Alex,
meinst du, da steht ein Schild 'Einfahrt verboten' wie am Ende einer Einbahnstraße? D.h. man darf da durchaus rausfahren? Dann müsste man das etwas komplizierter Taggen mit einer Abbiegebeschränkung. Im Augenblick sperrt das "motor_vehicle=no" ja den Verkehr in be...
22017-09-11 08:25:27 UTCAlex Makarov Hi, actually the gate was half-closed when I was driving by - so I think it was completely closed for drive-through. Maybe it's temporarily though.
12017-09-08 10:56:45 UTCmueschel Hallo,
wie sind diese Zugangsbeschränkungen zu verstehen? Sa/So ist das ganze Jahr über zu? Dann sollte das Tag sein:
access:conditional =\tno @ (oct-may);\tno @ (Sa-Su)

Und gilt das auch für Fußgänger? Sonst müsste da statt access vehicle oder sogar motor_vehicle...
22017-09-13 13:47:26 UTCanonym33 Ja, jetzt müsste es stimmen, das Fahrverbot Samstags und Sonntags gilt nur auf der Glarner Seite zwischen Richisau und der Kantonsgrenze, und es gilt nur für Motorfahrzeuge (was auch jetzt vermerkt ist).

Die Wintersperre Oktober-Mai gilt für alle, denn da wird halt die Straße...
12017-09-05 18:42:24 UTCmueschel http://openstreetmap.org/node/5060471909
has "lentil = 0". Did you mean 'level = 0'?

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-05 18:58:29 UTCyourealwaysbe What can i say, not everyone sells lentils :(

Fixed, thanks!
12017-09-04 19:26:07 UTCmueschel Welchen Zweck haben denn diese "Hilfspunkte"?
Gruß, Jan
22017-09-04 23:55:20 UTCberjk Ich habe einen Bekannten, der hat auf einer alten Karte von Hand die alte Grenze zwischen Kirchdorf eingezeichnet.
Durch abpausen und übertragen sind dann die Hilfspunkte entstanden, in der Hoffnung, dass man dort alte Straßen im Ort und alte Feldweg außerorts dann finden kann.
Da...
32017-09-04 23:56:04 UTCberjk Anm: da war ja einer mal richtig schnell!
12017-09-04 11:26:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some waste baskets here - amenity=waste_basket is the correct tag for them, but what is the meaning of all the other tags like these:
Name =\tMovable
description =\t19.134763, 72.906701
extrude = \t0
tessellate = \t-1
visibility =\t-1
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5077612639...
12017-09-04 11:24:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some copy shops to OSM - could you check them for correct tagging?
Please have a look to the wiki about tagging of these: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcopyshop

If you want to add further information like "A4, A3 (Coloured)", you can put this to a 'desc...
22017-09-11 10:37:50 UTCrasagy Hey Vineet,

Want to add on to Jan’s comment: Details about the print shops need to be added using relevant service tags for shop=copyshop, such as service:copy=yes (for photocopy service), service:print=yes (small set of prints) etc.
Details: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dc...
32017-09-14 05:31:12 UTCvineetkamboj Hi Rasagy,
I tried to update the tag (shop=copyshop) but still it is not rendering the correct icon.
12017-09-04 11:21:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some addresses with tags like these
addr:بلدية=تعظميت
addr:قرية=قرية النثيلة
addr:ولاية=الجلفة

Could you make sure the key only contains english keys as described in the wiki?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbe...
12017-09-04 11:19:41 UTCmueschel Are there really 56 police stations in this small area? It could be a "
amenity=security_booth", a tag that is used 74 times already.

Other question: Guard_type=Guard 30: H15 C wing - shouldn't this be a name = ...

And these tags I don't understand, could you explain them?
...
22017-09-04 20:14:59 UTCudayanvidyanta These are the position of the security guards. I couldn't find an appropriate icon/tag for them, so had to use the one for police.
32017-09-11 11:02:17 UTCrasagy Are these guards at an entrance (better to use barrier=entrance) or at a gate (better to use one of the gates in barrier tag (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier). Along with that, you can use barrier:personnel=yes (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier:personnel)

Also, not a...
12017-09-03 20:38:38 UTCmueschel Was soll dieser Node denn darstellen? Das Tagging nutzt leider keine üblichen Tags, so dass man auch nichts auf ener Karte davon sehen wird.
Gruß, Jan
12017-09-03 12:52:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you have a look to this tags?
Technique = 3x (2,38x4,85)
building = bengalow
Could you explain the "Technique" tag? And I guess you meant 'bungalow'.

Cheers, Jan
12017-09-03 12:39:17 UTCmueschel Hallo,
OSM enthält in der Regel keine historischen Daten, wenn Straßen umgebaut wurden, sollten die alten Linien entfernt werden und nicht mit einem (neu erfundenen) Tag "historic:mapping:*" in der Datenbank bleiben. Es handelt sich hier ja auch nur um einen einfachen Umbau ein...
22017-11-20 18:29:43 UTClisa-lias
Hallo mueschel,
danke für die Anmerkung im ersten Satz.
Ich bin mir gerade nicht so ganz sicher welchen Umbau Du im Detail meinst:

Meinst du a) einen potentiellen Umbau(Änderung) der Strassen-Gegebenheiten vor Ort on-the-ground, oder b) den Umbau (Änderung) der OSM Kreu...
32017-11-20 18:34:12 UTClfemak Upps, war gerade mit einen anderen Account eingeloggt.
Gruss lfemak
12017-09-03 12:34:51 UTCmueschel Hallo Daniel,
warum hast du hier im Ort alle Bushaltestellen entweder mit name=Stadtbus Kulmbach oder name=OVF Omnibus Verkehr Franken versehen? Das name-Tag dient dazu, den genauen Namen der Haltestelle zu erfassen, nicht für eine Beschreibung, wessen Busse dort halten.
Gruß, Jan
12017-09-03 10:06:57 UTCmueschel Bitte nicht die Position von Objekten nach Bing korrigieren! Bing-Bilder liegen 5-10 Meter falsch!
12017-06-06 11:15:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
is "Koma-koma" the name of this river?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331458995

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-03 08:29:20 UTCLineo Hi Jan,

Yes Koma-koma is the name of the river
32017-09-03 09:28:21 UTCmueschel Thank you for correcting the tags!
12017-09-01 19:29:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you invented a new tag here - "building:eaves:levels" what is its meaning?
Is building:levels and roof:levels not sufficient?

Cheers, Jan
22017-09-02 05:14:27 UTCKingigi Hi Jan,

Thank you for your message.
I tried to add the height and shape of some roofs, using some information I found on the OSM-Wiki.

Triggered by your message I did some more research and found a better way to add this information to OSM usingroof:levels, building:levels, and roof:shape

...
12017-09-01 09:27:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw the tags "line1" and "line2" on several of bus stops in this area. These tags are not used in other places. The key "route_ref" is used quite often for the purpose of noting the bus services stopping at a node. You can add several numbers / names in a list, s...
12017-09-01 09:23:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
In these edits you used two tags which are not common: "rain cover" and "sitting cap".
All our software (maps and other tools) can interpret this information only if common tags are used as they are described in the wiki. I think that "rain cover"...
12017-08-31 20:53:25 UTCmueschel Woher hast du diese ganzen access-Tags? An dem ganzen Weg gibt es kein einziges Schild, der Weg ist frei für jedweden Verkehr.
12017-08-31 10:53:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "Rue de la Vallée = Rue de Grande Maison" to 5 ways, could you check this name tag?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89129678
Cheers, Jan
12017-08-29 08:59:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
87 of these railways have a strange tag
"object_type,level=3". Could you check this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-08-29 21:11:13 UTCMelioraCogito I'll remove these tags as they didn't have the effect I was looking for – I was trying to set a map rendering level (1 being the lowest level) for each object as some of the greyed crossovers lines are sitting on top of the darker mainline objects (I tend to get a bit OCD over this kind of iss...
32017-08-29 21:30:23 UTCMelioraCogito P.S. – changes made.

Cheers.
42017-08-30 18:59:27 UTCmueschel Looks like the rendering order is not yet perfect for rails. Everything related to "how it looks like" is usually a matter of the renderer and 'solving' the error by changing the tagging should usually not be done.
The default OSM style can be found here:
https://github.com/gravitystorm...
12017-08-29 11:24:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several relations with only foreign tags - could you change those to common OSM tags?

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-28 13:54:30 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was möchtest du mit "wheelchair:description = geschlossen!" ausdrücken? Wenn das Restaurant nicht mehr existiert, sollte das auch so eingetragen werden.
Gruß, Jan
22017-08-28 19:54:54 UTCHAZET Hallo Jan,
das ist relativ einfach zu erklären. Ich habe die Markierung über Wheelmap gemacht - dort kann man nicht löschen. Und da mir die Warnung an Rollstuhlfahrer wichtiger war als korrektes Vorgehen, habe ich es erst mal so gemacht. Für Rollifahrer ist nichts blöder, a...
32017-08-28 19:57:55 UTCHAZET Ist offensichtlich schon gelöscht, dann ist doch alles gut.
42017-08-28 19:57:58 UTCmueschel Ich glaube nicht, dass dort zu ist - es gibt ein aktuelles Wochenmenü.
52017-08-28 19:58:51 UTCHAZET Dann hat es vielleicht einen anderen Inhaber? Anderes Lokal eingezogen?
62017-08-28 20:03:51 UTCHAZET Irgendwas stimmt doch mit diesem Knoten nicht. Wieso bekomme ich die Adresse nicht mehr?
Der Schanzenstern ist umgezogen nach Altona, Bartelsstraße ist passé.
12017-08-28 14:02:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
ist zwar schon ewig her, aber der Grenzverlauf hier kommt mir komisch vor. Hast du da irgendwo eine nutzbare Quelle?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/324148365

Gruß, Jan
22017-08-28 19:08:23 UTCMichaH Das sieht mir so aus als ob ich hier damals diesen einen Knoten der Grenze versehendlich verschoben habe.
12017-08-28 13:57:20 UTCmueschel Hallo,
welche Bedeutung hat das Tag "wiki_link = hamburg.freifunk.net"? Wenn es hier WLAN gibt, dann bitte mit "internet_access..." eintragen.
Jan
12017-08-28 11:41:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the name of this street, I guess it is wrong.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42726531

Carrera 45A = Ciudadela Guadalupe
name = Calle 5A
12017-08-28 11:20:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you have a look to these edits? There are 89 ways with the key 'cyclway' instead of 'cycleway'.

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-27 16:44:45 UTCmueschel Woher hast du denn diese merkwürdige Linienführung der 64 am Bahnhof? Durch die Seestraße fährt er sicher nicht, sonst käme er auch nicht am Bussteig A vorbei.
22017-08-28 11:59:10 UTCTetiSoft Danke für den Hinweis, jetzt hält er erst an A dann an B und nutzt nicht die Seestraße.
12017-08-27 11:13:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/412055749

phar = pha looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-27 11:12:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7484856
Is this a restrictions for cars higher than the given value? Then it should be
... @ height > 13'6"
We're referring to the actual size of the vehicle, not a restriction like 'maxheight'.

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-27 16:19:49 UTCdannykath Hi, mueschel! Thank you for you attentiveness. Of course, in this case it is forbidden to drive cars higher than 13'6'', not equal to 13'6''.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7484856
I fixed TR according to you comment. Best regards Danny
12017-08-27 09:24:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw that you added destination tags to roads. In some cases you mixed up the order of key, subkey and suffix, e.g.

destination:lanes:colour -> destination:colour:lanes
destination:backward:ref -> destination:ref:backward
I think I fixed most of them, maybe you can check this as wel...
22017-08-28 16:59:44 UTCd3mol3k thx Jan
Robert
12017-08-26 18:12:18 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM!
Bitte schau mal hier im Wiki nach, wie Ladestationen üblicherweise getagged werden - das muss konsistent sein, damit Anwendungen mit den Informationen etwas anfangen können.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Wenn du Frage...
12017-08-25 11:48:16 UTCAsgerFrank Korte spærringsændringer kan være problematiske, men husk i det mindste om muligt selv at rette tilbage, det er ikke sikkert andre gør.
22017-08-25 11:56:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
I didn't add this oneway tag, I just corrected it to a scheme that is already in use, see the history: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516178075/history

The good thing about the temporary:* scheme is that nobody has to remember to remove it - the end date is given in the value, so there are...
32017-08-25 12:04:02 UTCAsgerFrank Great, apparently my comment is completely unnecessary; I must educate myself http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional)
12017-08-25 10:59:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
why did you delete so many existing buildings and redraw them? In general, this is considered bad practice because it delete the history of an object.

I also doubt that all these buildings actually have this shape - most buildings are rectangular.

Third, you added the tag "building=...
12017-08-25 10:49:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw that you added destination tags to roads. In some cases you mixed up the order of key, subkey and suffix, e.g.

lanes:destination -> destination:lanes
destination:lanes:colour -> destination:colour:lanes

I think I fixed most of them, maybe you can check this as well.
In gene...
12017-08-22 18:36:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515538457
All of the tags despite highway=path are no tags that are common in OSM.

Jan
12017-08-22 18:28:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
what do you mean by "casher = no"? This tag is not used in any other place.

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-22 18:25:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong with this import. more than 1700 nodes have only strange tags like these:
CODLOC=25048
addr_city=Gressan
addr_house=2
addr_post=11020
addr_stre=Les Fleurs

I can't find this import in the Wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue\...
22017-08-23 06:22:12 UTCCUSPC Hi, I can not find them anymore. There are only the correct ones. The didier2020 correction is correct. Thank you
12017-08-19 18:30:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "maxwheight" to two ways. I can't decide whether this should be 'maxweight' or 'maxheight'.
http://osm.org/way/445731771
http://osm.org/way/49901956

Jan
12017-08-19 14:17:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, it has only foreign tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5026647150

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-19 17:06:58 UTCAndersAndersson I forgot to remove the tags added by the GPS. It is now fixed.
12017-08-19 14:15:00 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ich kann im "Gästebrief" den du als Quelle angibst, keinen Hinweis zu einer Lizenz erkennen, der es erlaubt die Daten in OSM zu übernehmen. Hast du da eine schriftliche Erlaubnis?
Gruß, Jan
12017-08-06 13:09:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these nodes? Most have tags which look like they don't belong to OSM, like these:
Lat=32.231613
Lon=-110.971756
STINTERSEC=STONE AV / UNIVERSITY BL

Jan
22017-08-06 13:11:03 UTCmueschel Addendum:
It looks like none of these points is actually part of a road - that is required to be able to use this information e.g. in routing engines.
32017-08-08 21:45:43 UTCDylansc These are all tagged according to People For Bikes OpenStreetMap Tagging Guidelines for HAWKs (signaled crosswalks)... I followed the guidelines listed here

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HuAXQUnCEcv9aLZyIDHkLTJ5ZSKfB-U4MlJSmN-1BLk/edit#heading=h.tle1tl5ruh6c

These points aren't part of t...
42017-08-08 23:08:41 UTCmueschel This document is a good reference. But there is no reference to the keys Lat, Lon, STINTERSEC I mentioned above, which should not be there.

Ways consist of points, and the crossing tags need to be on a point that belongs to a way. It's as simple as that.


52017-08-15 22:10:50 UTCDylansc Would the best method for me to fix this be for each 131 nodes:
1. go into "edit with iD" edit mode
2. Delete the 3 unnecessary tags (Lat, Lon, and STINTERSEC)
3. snap it to appropriate intersection/roadway

Additionally, I feel I should add some sort of tag that says specifically a H...
62017-08-16 08:11:45 UTCmueschel Yes, this is a possible way.
a) if you use iD, check all tags again after snapping the node to the intersection - some of them are already tagged and this might cause iD to add wrong tags.

b) Are these traffic lights for pedestrians only or do they control the intersection as well?
http://www....
72017-08-17 18:54:49 UTCDylansc a) noted

b) I think you are incorrect for "if they control the whole intersection, use highway=traffic_lights, there is no further tagging needed" (first off I think you meant to say highway=traffic_signals).

according to:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_si...
82017-08-17 18:59:37 UTCmueschel Yes, you are right. I was a too concise here.
I only described the highway=* tag, not the crossing=*, which is equal in both cases.

"There is no further tagging needed..." was meant to be a new paragraph addressing your question on how to make clear it is HAWK.
92017-08-17 19:07:54 UTCDylansc Great! I'll proceed in correcting the errors one by one.

Thanks
12017-08-17 10:55:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added tags like this one to more than 200 objects. Could you have a look and remove them?
extensions \t<extensions xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ogr="http://osgeo.org/gdal" xmlns="http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1">
<o...
12017-08-17 10:45:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some ways with only strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514499767
Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-17 10:40:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like this and another changeset added 51 objects with strange tags like these:

ADDRTYPE=SUBORD
FULLADDR=20 MALACHIGAN, CROISSANT DU
PI_MUNICIP=__AK2WLJ
POINT_X=383815.2027
POINT_Y=5034062.8701
22017-08-17 11:30:45 UTCLogicalViolinist Sorry about that, ill remove them
32017-08-17 12:18:55 UTCLogicalViolinist Corrected in: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51203524
12017-08-16 10:56:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key 'estd:' to various objects. This key is not yet used in any other place. I guess you should use "start_date" instead, which is used everywhere else.

Also, please use the Gregorian Calendar for dates - otherwise data can not be easily understood by any OSM tool.
\...
12017-08-16 10:55:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key 'estd:' to various objects. This key is not yet used in any other place. I guess you should use "start_date" instead, which is used everywhere else.

Also, please use the Gregorian Calendar for dates - otherwise data can not be easily understood by any OSM tool.
\...
12017-08-16 10:33:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added a new key here, and used several different spellings:

FR:grande_circulation
fr:grande_circulation
fr:grande_circulation_1

OSM Tags are case sensitive, could you change them to a common spelling? Additionally, we usually don't put a language code in front of a tag. It should be...
22017-08-16 12:23:31 UTCbibi6 Hi,
Thanks for pointing me this out. I actually wanted to use the FR:grande_circulation tag, but I probably did a wrong manip for the others (unless iD doesn't care about case :/ )
Anyway, taking your second remark into account, I'm going to use grande_circulation instead. (Changeset 51169807 is ...
12017-08-15 20:37:54 UTCmueschel Fixed several 'maxpeed' tags - could you check if I got them all?
12017-08-15 20:37:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "maxpeed:tilting" on a bunch of tracks. Could you edit them and add the missing 's'?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-15 21:58:10 UTCflierfy Hello Jan,
I thank you for the hint. I've added the missing letter.
With thankful regards, Stephan
12017-08-14 11:35:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of 'eruv' on this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513968801

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-14 14:56:41 UTCElliottPlack Jan,

Sure, an eruv is a physical object that serves as a symbolic boundary in the Jewish Orthodox faith. Read more:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv

There isn't a great tag for this yet on OSM, so I added this under the premise of the "Any tags you like" principle (http://wiki.opens...
32017-08-14 15:13:16 UTCmueschel Alright, I haven't seen this before.
I see one potential problem with the tagging: A barrier=* implies an access restriction, by default access=no. So, if anybody by mistake adds a common node with any highway, routing engines might think traffic is blocked.
I don't think we have a proper tagging...
42017-08-15 02:48:02 UTCElliottPlack Jan: I'm glad that you found this and commented. I think your idea is superb. I was trying to decide if I should use an existing key like barrier but you make a good point that it could be interpreted by a routing engine as a generic barrier. Better to start something totally fresh.

What do you t...
52017-08-15 18:42:39 UTCmueschel ':' versus '_' - there is no functional difference between the two. Usually, ':' is used for subkeys, e.g. a key that further describes the main key, e.g. 'capacity' and the more specific 'capacity:disabled'. The underscore is more used like a replacement for a space as in "internet_access"...
12017-08-14 09:22:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "Wifi_Etecsa = Wifi_Etecsa" on several nodes - this is not a common tag, could you explain its meaning? If it is the operator of the Wifi, consider the key internet_access:operator

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-14 09:19:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check the Russian tags on this object? All objects have to use the tags described in the wiki, otherwise this information can not be understood by any software.

деятельность = отдых
деятельность_1 = пансионат
озеро = исс...
12017-08-14 08:54:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
what do you mean using the prefix "will:" on these buildings? The usual prefixes include planned:, proposed: and "construction", see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-14 09:43:42 UTCfreeExec Thanks for the help, I will change for the planned.
12017-08-13 18:07:29 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier Öffnungszeiten eingetragen - könntest du sie noch ändern, so dass sie nach dem gängigen Schema getagged sind? So lassen sie sich dann auch automatisch auswerten und in diversen Tools anzeigen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening hours

Wenn ...
12017-08-10 19:10:20 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier mehrfach 'raised:building' geschrieben - meinst du 'razed'?
Jan
22017-08-11 15:57:24 UTCgeozeisig Du hast recht ich finde es aber spontan nicht wieder.
32017-08-11 16:25:38 UTCmueschel Kein Problem:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qWB
12017-08-11 10:59:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. All objects in OSM need to have a tag that describes what they are. Just putting a human readable description on a node won't do the job. The wiki shows how these tags should look like, e.g. here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dbasin

Jan
12017-08-09 07:00:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key 'namleg_en' on several boundaries. This key is new and not used in other places. Maybe the usual tags 'official_name', 'official_name:en' or 'full_name' fit?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-09 14:33:11 UTCUndearius My apologies. I had originally intended to remove these tags but they made it easier for filtering. The value of these tags is their full, proper legal name so they may be useful.
The 'namleg_en' tag is the same as the 'name' tag with the addition of "Township of" or "County of"...
32017-08-10 17:15:54 UTCmueschel 'official_name:en' is used almost 2000 times, and follows the guidelines shown on the Wiki page on name tags.
Thanks for taking care!
42017-08-14 19:53:47 UTCUndearius I've changed the tags to the correct ones. Thank you for the help.
12017-08-06 13:07:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "Varsure" on some of these nodes. Could you explain its meaning?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-09 09:37:29 UTCddm-dolomitico Hi Jan,

the "Varsure" tag is a editing error (in fact "Varsure" is the name of a location); I corrected the wrong tags with "name: lld" or "loc_name".

Thank you very much for your error reporting. In the future, I will pay more attention to OSM's editing...
32017-08-09 09:51:43 UTCddm-dolomitico Hi Jan,

I was wrong, now all "Varsure" tags are correct (I found out the use of "taginfo" so I saw the list of all the wrong tags)

Cheers, Danilo
42017-08-09 12:04:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
thanks for taking the time and fixing this. You can also use http://overpass-turbo.eu/to search for a key (click on 'wizard' and enter "Varsure=* global" then click run)
12017-08-09 07:17:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
bist du sicher, dass die Fahrt hier wirklich 20 Minuten dauert? Oder meinst du, dass die Fähre alle 20 Minuten fährt?

Jan
12017-08-06 20:11:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many very strange tags here and on other restaurants. Please have a look to the Wiki to see how objects are tagged in OSM.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513151990
DiningRoomHours
DriveThruHours
EnglishApplicationUrl
HasDiningRoom
HasDriveThru
ImageUrl
Latitude
Longitude
O...
22017-08-06 20:21:05 UTCmneko I'm trying to follow the instructions on http://maproulette.org/ui/metrics/433
i might have misunderstood it
32017-08-06 21:50:48 UTCmueschel I don't think they meant to copy all the data from there. You can have a look how other restaurants of this chain are mapped:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qQe
42017-08-07 14:09:40 UTCmneko OK, I think I corrected the ones I broke
52017-08-08 18:29:35 UTCmueschel This looks good. *thumbs up
12017-08-08 10:28:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 32 buildings have the tag "B30 2DH=B30" which looks like a mistake. Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-08 14:17:43 UTCbrianboru Thanks Jan - what happened here I don't know! Corrected now
12017-08-08 10:27:16 UTCmueschel These changes contain 33x "maxpeed" instead of "maxspeed".
Jan
12017-08-07 11:11:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tag on this road (and other segments of it)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59990980
"L3036 = Reddy's Crossroads" looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-07 11:06:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 53 objects with the tag "stig=stig" which looks like a mistake, could you check that?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qQM

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-07 21:12:30 UTCfatuus Stig taggas med highway=path
12017-08-06 12:32:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check 23 of these lines? they have some strange tags like these which seem to be added by mistake:

CITYOBJECT_ID=186033
GMLID=BID_ba033755-60eb-4cfa-a17f-787c9a794cad
ROOF_TYPE=1000

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-06 13:48:28 UTCMarkus Valo Thanks for noticing! Tried to clean all of them. All of those tags are unnecessary.
32017-08-06 14:28:35 UTCmueschel Thanks for your effort. Here are the remaining ones:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qPZ
42017-08-06 14:49:54 UTCMarkus Valo All clean now, thanks for the tool link!
12017-08-06 13:17:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "caricato=false" on 41 ways. This tag is not used in any other place - could you explain its meaning?

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-06 12:59:17 UTCmueschel Is there any chance that this import gets cleaned up? (Just commenting this one changeset, not all of them)

There are hundreds of POIs without proper tags, with a lot of text in undocumented tags like "note50", "opening_hours" which don't use the documented syntax and so on.
...
22017-09-22 21:27:15 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52290172 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed import 50238127 which introduced lots of odd tags. Attempts to discuss with mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1458 et al. Since-edited objects lef...
12017-07-10 07:44:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these imported nodes?
- 'is_in' can not be used to tag addresses. Use addr:street and addr:housenumber instead
- 'Ref:FR:SIREN' should be 'ref:FR:SIREN'
- description1 and description2 are no recognized tags
- most nodes are missing a physical tag, describing ...
22017-08-06 12:55:26 UTCmueschel Is there any chance that this import gets cleaned up?
Various people are doing some corrections on this data, but in the end most of the information remains useless.

Jan
32017-08-19 08:39:31 UTCzerpou Hi,

I'm a french student in engineering of 20 years and in a part of my leisure time I do some changes on OSM.

This morning I have deleted a part of "is_in" and description1/2. In addition I modify the tag "Ref...".

Best regards,

Albin

42017-09-22 21:27:07 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52290172 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed import 50238127 which introduced lots of odd tags. Attempts to discuss with mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1458 et al. Since-edited objects lef...
12017-07-06 08:29:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
this import of fountains doesn't seem to fit to the OSM license.
You put these tags on all nodes:
Fonte = Metropolitana Milanese - MM
Licenza = CC-BY
cc-by is not compatible with ODbL, see
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

And, please don't invent new keys li...
22017-07-06 08:52:17 UTCNemo_bis Sorry for the Italian keys, I was confused by the localisation. Will fix these in a moment.

The blog post you link is about the generic CC-BY licenses, but this dataset is under CC-BY-IT which has a special provision waiving all rights for databases, hence Creative Commons Italia believes such da...
32017-07-06 08:59:04 UTCmueschel Could you mention this specifically in the changeset comment / source tag? Just so that nobody else gets confused or thinks cc-by is sufficient.
42017-07-11 10:11:44 UTCAndreas Lattmann Ciao Nemo_bis, hai fatto la pagina nel Wiki per l' import? Non la riesco a trovare. Grazie
52017-08-05 18:20:31 UTCmueschel Are you still going to fix this and provide a documentation of the import?
62017-10-06 19:28:53 UTCAlecs01 See also the previous changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50065252
12017-07-26 12:25:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong here - these nodes all have tags like "ref=290 = RU-KDA-6" - the key of this tag is 'ref=290' which can't be right. Could you have a look and fix this? It's about 150 different keys.
22017-08-05 18:07:28 UTCmueschel I changed these tags now. Please check if my edit is correct.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50868182
12017-08-05 17:46:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many objects with very strange tags here - for example

highway=64/24
natural=Chu Thị Thuong Ha
shop=TDok

What is the meaning of all this? Pleae have a look to the OSM wiki to learn about how objects have to be tagged to be usable by OSM users.

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-01 19:18:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are many nodes which have just strange tags like these:
CODLOC=12
GEOCODICE=12/5
GRAFICO=5
LINK=12-5
NCIV=5

Was this a mistake?
Jan
22017-08-02 07:55:12 UTCCUSPC I have joined a full level rather than just the selection.
Now I've corrected all tags.
thank you
32017-08-05 17:33:46 UTCmueschel They are still there: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qPu
12017-08-04 16:50:24 UTCGinaroZ I think mot is correct, as it offers an MOT service?
22017-08-04 17:40:28 UTCmueschel Shouldn't it be amenity=vehicle_inspection or service:vehicle:inspection=yes then? The first is documented and used 800 times, the latter is used 30 times.
32017-08-05 13:14:28 UTCSomeoneElse Something involving MOT would make perfect sense to me - see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=mot#keys and http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=mot#values for where it's been used before. "inspection" is hardly used for MOTs; see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/sea...
42017-08-05 13:49:16 UTCmueschel I'm not from the UK, so I didn't hear the term MOT before.
But as far as I see, these tags involving the term MOT are used maybe 50 times in the UK, while all the rest of Europe has the tag amenity=vehicle_inspection used 1300 times. This tag is supported in JOSM and shown e.g. in Osmand as well.
...
12017-08-04 15:23:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way, it has foreign tags only:
http://osm.org/way/511262268

12017-08-03 16:17:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
most of these nodes have only foreign tags which don't look like they should appear in the OSM database, can you check this?

Btw, what is the precise license of this data? Pure cc-by is not compatible with ODbL!
22017-08-03 16:29:25 UTCStefano baldissera Licenza d'uso CC-BY 2.5 fonte dati SITAD REGIONE PIEMONTE . http://www.sistemapiemonte.it/serviziositad/index.shtml

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/it/
32017-08-04 21:44:42 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50850714.
12017-08-02 19:05:38 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM. Was genau möchtest du hier mappen? Damit Software etwas mit den Informationen anfangen kann, müssen die Tags genau so wie im Wiki beschrieben benutzt werden. Wirf doch mal einen Blick auf Parkplätze und E-Tankstellen.
Bei Fragen hilft man dir im Forum ger...
22017-08-03 15:32:13 UTCNakaner Hallo Jan,

der Rest der Beiträge dieses Benutzers scheint auch größtenteils nicht von ernsthafter Natur zu sein. Ich habe es mir im Detail aber nicht angesehen und habe nicht die Zeit, mich darum zu kümmern.

Viele Grüße

Michael
12017-08-01 19:21:48 UTCmueschel Kannst du die ganzen 'capacity' tags an diesem und anderen Nodes überprüfen? Für die Leistung gibt es 'power' als Tag.

Gruß, Jan
22017-08-02 14:23:38 UTCbusch19 Danke für den Hinweis (bin neu). Habe es geändert.

Steffen
32017-08-02 18:22:47 UTCmueschel Das hatte ich gar nicht gesehen... Dann nachträglich noch: herzlich willkommen bei OSM! Zögere nicht dich zum Beispiel im Forum zu melden wenn du Fragen hast.
12017-08-01 19:45:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
could uou check the roads you added here?
15 of them have only strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511074247
12017-08-01 19:42:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the nodes you added, some have tags like
ADDRESS=1810 J 6/10 Rd, Fruita, 81521
PUB_PRI2=Public
STREET_TYP=Rd

This looks like a mistake.
12017-08-01 19:34:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
please be a bit careful when uploading changes - I found two relations where you changed an exisying key to 'ы'
22017-08-02 07:39:46 UTCmisht Ok, I'm sorry. Accidentally.
12017-08-01 19:16:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
63 ways got the tag 'wip_remove_me' - was this a mistake?
Cheers, Jan
22017-08-01 21:11:49 UTCM!dgard Uh yes, I added that to be able to conveniently select the ways I had to change, and I forgot to remove them. Fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/50764793. Thanks for the heads-up!
12017-07-31 15:45:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain all the name tags of this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4858193412
I doubt it has this name with '3.5 t'
22017-08-01 07:13:29 UTCJay May Hi :)
Sure! This is for people using OSM-based GPS apps (ex.: maps.me) to know which lane is for regular cars (≤3.5t meaning “for vehicles with a weight up to 3,5 tons), and which one is for trucks (TIR, abbreviation of Transport International Routier, is understood by every truck driver u...
32017-08-01 14:30:29 UTCmueschel We do have a clear policy that the name tag contains just the actual name and does not contain any description. For this you can use tags like maxweight or hgv. If tools like maps.me do not support this, request them to adapt to common OSM tagging rules.
42017-08-01 17:40:00 UTCJay May One question: what will it change for OSM if those border control tagged names are not visible to regular OSM users anyway?
52017-08-01 18:15:40 UTCmueschel Who is a "regular osm user"? There are hundreds of different maps and tools around. All of them render different things. And for example searching for names gets increasingly difficult if we add arbitrary information to the name tag.
62017-08-01 18:52:38 UTCJay May I'm afraid this is not arbitrary info. It is useful info, otherwise I wouldn't waste my time to look for it and reflect it on OSM. Rules are there as an indication, and may sometimes be wrong Some of them must be changed.
You state the policy on names it clear. I'm afraid it isn't. There are a cou...
12017-07-30 16:05:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 12 objects in your uploads with many foreign keys and no common OSM tags. Could you have a look and fix these?
Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510975694

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-30 16:03:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
most of the information you added does not use common tags. Spelling and Upper/Lower case matters a lot for software to be able to interpret these tags, e.g.
name instead of NAME
name:ar instead of Name_ar
place instead of Place
and so on. Could you please fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-30 15:45:15 UTCmueschel Please be careful what you upload to OSM. It's the second time I'm deleting tags like these:
Simon = Weak
Michael = Strong
Peter = Above Average
(I removed the user names you had there)
12017-07-30 15:37:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
some of the nodes have many foreign tags, could you check that? E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5002215004

Ja
22017-08-01 18:46:51 UTCAlan Bragg Thanks for catching that error and notifying me. I found that I had another similar error which I have corrected.
12017-07-16 13:11:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "access:coach =discouraged" in this changeset. This tag has not been used in other places yet.
I guess the common tag "tourist_bus = discouraged" is what you want to use here?

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-29 11:13:46 UTCgurglypipe Not really. The tagging is meant to reflect a road sign which says “Not suitable for coaches”. The tagging documentation I was following is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddiscouraged.
32017-07-29 12:40:46 UTCmueschel 'access:' is never a part of those keys. And osm knows two types of busses: bus and tourist_bus. Both are described on the wiki page you linked to. The 'discouraged' part is perfectly fine.
42017-07-29 13:04:36 UTCgurglypipe I was following the example of `access:bicycle=yes` (from that page). I guess the intention of the road sign could be encoded as `bus=discouraged`, `tourist_bus=discouraged`? The sign is probably more targeting the length and wheel base of the vehicles rather than their use as PSVs or multi-person v...
52017-07-29 14:07:38 UTCmueschel I don't know why this is listed there. The correct tag is 'bicycle' and is used 10000 times more often (300 vs 3 million uses)
62017-07-29 16:23:55 UTCgurglypipe OK, changed to bus=discouraged tourist_bus=discouraged in changeset #50675680. I’m not sure if I got all the instances of it, since I can’t get overpass to list any access:coach instances. (I’m obviously using it wrongly.)
72017-07-29 16:41:19 UTCmueschel Goto overpass-turbo.eu, Open the wizard and type 'access:coach=* global', click run. There is nothing left.
82017-07-30 08:07:26 UTCgurglypipe Great, thanks
12017-07-27 10:37:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tracktype tag of this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509577193

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-27 11:25:12 UTCwajak corrected. Thanks
12017-07-27 10:32:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
it's preferred to use the key 'alt_name' instead of 'name_1' - alt_name can be searched for (e.g. in the search box on osm.org) while most tools do not support name_1.

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-27 06:16:29 UTCcalfarome Hello Kyaw Htet Aung,
Thank you for your map edits, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
What is the source of this data that you are adding?, it seems that each of the points you added has its duplicates to the side and that is inconsistent for OpenStreetMap.
Could you please explain what happening i...
22017-07-27 08:32:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
it also looks like there are many tags copied from the source without changing them to common OSM standards. E.g. these tags should not appear in OSM

Shape_Area=0.00606869668746
Shape_Leng=0.57835062104
lat=16.850959
lng=96.162165

And, for example name tags in different languages have ...
32017-07-29 21:30:33 UTCrene78 Time to revert?
12017-07-26 15:59:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong here.
There are 160 nodes on the same spot, all with a lot of foreign tags which don't look like they belong to OSM:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4990832927

Jan
22017-07-26 16:02:00 UTCmueschel PS: I doubt that these lights are 4.5 km high. 'height' uses meter as units, not millimeters.
32017-07-28 13:58:06 UTCdidier2020 i fix height in this changeset 50650261
42017-08-08 14:20:20 UTCArjanO I guess something went wrong with an import.
Point taken.

best regards,
Arjano
12017-07-26 12:38:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
das tag 'vtm = yes' - soll das 'atm' heißen?
Gruß, Jan
22017-07-26 13:28:20 UTCFuss-im-Ohr jetzt hab ich schon einen Note angefügt.....
32017-07-26 13:29:49 UTCFuss-im-Ohr dafür stimmt aber die FaxNr nicht ganz, das merkt natürlich keiner :-)
42017-07-26 13:35:26 UTCmueschel Das übersieht man durchaus, vor allem wenn da nur ein Link steht und keine Erklärung. Da es sich um eine Bezahlmethode handelt, sollte der Tag wohl 'payment:vtm = yes' heißen, besser noch payment:vtm-fair, damit es eindeutiger zugeordnet ist.
52017-07-26 13:42:54 UTCFuss-im-Ohr das macht sogar Sinn, da es noch ein "neuer" Tag ist müsste man es im Wiki auch mal zur Diskussion stellen. Im IRC gab es noch keine Meinung dazu
62017-07-26 13:53:44 UTCmueschel Du kannst es einfach hier eintragen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:payment#Tankkarten
Das Tagging-Schema ist ja etabliert, da braucht es meiner Meinung nach keine Diskussion.
12017-07-25 11:27:01 UTCmueschel Was meinst du denn mit "scheduled"? Üblicherweise nehmen wir doch preproposed / proposed / planned / construction.
Gruß, Jan
22017-07-27 21:51:51 UTCJojo4u Ich dachte ich mache nochmal Werbung für mein scheduled-Proposal. Aber jetzt am Desktop sehe ich bei Taginfo nur 2 Objekte. Aber planned wird ja auch noch nicht gerendert...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Scheduled_lifecycle
32017-09-26 09:18:16 UTCGerdP Bitte ändern. Ich finde, wir haben wirklich genug etablierte Möglichkeiten, einen Weg zu mappen, den es nicht gibt.
ciao, Gerd
42017-10-03 19:27:36 UTCJojo4u Welches Tag würdest du bevorzugen? Proposed oder planned?
52017-10-03 19:32:08 UTCGerdP Ich kenne die Sachlage nicht. Scheduled klingt nach "irgendwas in Richtung Bau passiert bereits" und das wäre dann mehr planned als proposed.
62017-10-05 17:55:17 UTCJojo4u habe es als highway=planned gesetzt
12017-07-23 09:06:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
this changeset contains 24 times the tag "farrmland", note the spelling mistake.
Could you have a look and fix it?
Cheers, Jan
22017-07-23 10:47:03 UTCMichaelCollinson Jan, Thanks for pointing that out. Yes, I will fix it.
12017-07-23 09:04:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some ways with these tags:
edited=true
import=yes
I guess these are not needed and can be removed?

Jan
22017-07-25 23:56:37 UTCVLD009 Hi Jan,
Thank you for your message! The import=yes is used to tag our contributions. This is further explained in the wiki [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing] where our process is documented. The edited=true tag is an internal tag and is not needed - we removed the tag. Th...
12017-07-23 09:01:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tags on some of the buildings?
These look rather strange to me:
ww=1
ww3=1

And, "signage=Korean" - this is not common in OSM, what do you want to describe with this tag?

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-23 11:28:06 UTCWei Wu Hi,
Sorry for making you confused, we're now working on a project about Korean-Chinese isolation in Garibong-dong based on the usages and signage of buildings.
Signage-Korean means these commercial buildings only have Korean signs, and we also marked other buildings as Korean-Chinese or Korean -En...
12017-07-23 09:00:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain how you added these huge landuse areas? According to satellite images, they don't seem to be correct. For example, there is a larger town in one of your landuse=farmland and vice versa.

Additionally, you used the unknown keys "Eneo" and "Matumizi". Can ...
12017-07-23 08:55:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
on these trees I found several tags which are not common in OSM - maybe you can have a look and find more common ones?
Cheers, Jan

animate=yes
area=not applicable
established=1988-12-02
sign=improperly
size=not applicable
vitality=3
22017-07-23 09:40:57 UTCwmyrda All those tags in few minor chageset have their actual meaning which is a preparation of much larger data set from polish national registry of nature preservation. There is discussion in polish subforum about it https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=656206#p656206 I have explained there...
12017-07-22 12:47:47 UTCSK53 I wonder if the Carshalton Beeches should be promoted to a suburb with places like Carshalton-on-the-Hill as neighbourhoods. When I lived & worked around here 'Barrow Hedges catchment' was the key divide for Carshalton Beeches. The dividing line to N is a bit hard to pick out (everything S of ra...
22017-07-22 13:46:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
I don't know this area nor the situation - I just changed your "note_for_wikipedians" to the common "note" key so that editors are able to show it to other mappers.
12017-07-22 12:06:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
please have a look to the Wiki on how to map traffic signs:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-20 11:04:09 UTCmueschel ... and another set of 852 wrong address tags.
22017-07-20 14:35:28 UTCAndrew Matheny Fixed! Thank you
12017-07-18 11:12:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
Something went wrong here - you added your user name to 49 trees as a tag, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4973522973

Could you have a look?
Jan
22017-07-18 12:47:05 UTCRayhan Hossen Hi Jan,

Thanks for your message.

I've just checked that changesets and yes, you're right. I don't have any clear idea but somehow I added my username as a tag on those trees. I'm gonna delete those tags.

Thanks a lot!

Regards,
Rayhan Hossen
12017-07-18 10:45:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the maxspeed on this way? Looks like a spelling mistake.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507556776

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-18 11:02:35 UTCAnonix35 It's corrected. Small error
12017-07-17 12:07:00 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was stellt dieser Knoten da? perch = yes und name = Perch sind leider keine Beschreibung, die in OSM gebräuchlich sind. Schau doch mal ins Wiki, wie überlicherweise getagged wird - oder beschreibe das Objekt hier genauer, dann kann ich weiterhelfen.
Gruß, Jan
12017-07-16 11:32:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added a strange tag on 97 objects:
"tourism=apartment=16"
Did you mean rooms = 16 or number_of_apartments = 16?

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-17 06:35:26 UTCAmbush Hi Jan,
it was a mistake, roomer wanted to set addr:housenumber = 16, but something went wrong =)

I've fixed it.

WBR, Pavel
12017-07-15 10:30:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these shapes? They don't have any valid tags. For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506808224

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-15 10:41:46 UTCgetBounds Thanks not sure what happened here. I think these are supposed to be holes in the park polygon. I'll have to check. I assume I can cut holes in polygons in iD?
12017-07-15 10:28:04 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM!
you added these tags to a node:
Acera ampliada = si
Alta visibilidad = si
Isleta o zona protegida = no
Rampa en linea con el cruce = si
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4962761018

This might be a good description of the object, but is not understood by any OSM-b...
12017-07-14 10:42:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
this stream as 18 foreign keys which don't look like they should appear in the OSM database. Could you have a look?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506460710

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-13 20:01:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some ways with strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506883545
Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan
22017-07-13 21:01:10 UTCChristianA Haha, the road data came from an open dataset from the Swedish road administration. I forgot to change the attributes from some of the roads. I will fix it.
32017-07-13 21:16:08 UTCChristianA How can I find all roads that have the bad data?
42017-07-14 08:21:55 UTCmueschel You can use overpass-turbo and its Wizard:

http://overpass-turbo.eu?w=STARTAVST=*+global

Looks like there is only one way left:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506288954
12017-07-12 11:28:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of the name of this street (and its second part)?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233256198

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-12 11:11:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
when mapping service times, you don't need to use several tags for all the days. They can be combined into one:
service_times=So 07:30; 10:00; 19:00
service_times_1=Sat 19:00
service_times_2=Fr 19:30
service_times_3=Wed 15:00

service_times = Su 07:30, 10:00, 19:00; Sa 19:00; Fr 19:30; We...
22017-07-12 21:46:54 UTCAjBelnuovo Jan , ok , obrigado pelas informações . Vou editar como de acordo com as informações que me enviou.

Abraços , Airton
12017-07-10 08:05:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? The tag 70 = 90 looks strange.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505304853

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-10 08:19:25 UTCSenbee Just corrected. Thank you.
Cheers, Stefano
12017-07-10 07:01:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many points with tags like these:
BLOCK_No \t017
HOUSE_No \tPNB BANK
WARD_No \t51
ZONE_No \tZONE-D
Unfortunately, this information can not be used by any OSM tool or map. Please have a look to the wiki how addresses have to mapped so that they can be found and shown:
https://wik...
22017-07-10 23:23:44 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
12017-07-10 06:58:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check some other mapped areas to find out how streets are commonly mapped in OSM. Drawing the outline of the road might look nice in some map, but is otherwise rather useless.
If you have questions, feel free to contact the OSM community!
22017-07-10 23:23:45 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
12017-07-10 06:29:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
are there really 90 hotels with the same name in this city?
22017-07-10 23:23:41 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
12017-07-09 14:18:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of "disabled_vehicle=no"?
http://osm.org/way/505049343 and 2 more
Cheers, Jan
22017-07-09 16:16:59 UTCAllroads Hello,
You find it ;-), this recently added tag. Because of a traffic sign.
Netherlands traffic_signs https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden#C:_Geslotenverklaring
says at C9 or C13 or C14 or C15.

"gehandicaptenvoertuigen" a "voertuíg...
32017-07-09 17:19:48 UTCmueschel Alright. Looked like a mistake to me, not knowing the details.
12017-07-09 14:29:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check the tagging of some of the nodes - they all have tags which don't look like they belong to OSM. For example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505332377

Jan
12017-07-09 14:26:02 UTCmueschel Hier stimmt etwas nicht mit der direction:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4950394110
22017-07-10 07:37:42 UTCLoneship Danke für den Hinweis, habe es korrigiert.
12017-07-09 14:24:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node? I guess something went wrong with the name tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4950931435
Cheers, Jan
12017-07-09 14:22:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these rooms? They have many tags which don't look like they should appear in OSM, for example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505040179

chinese_t = 312演藝廳
english = auditorium
label = 演藝廳
navi = true
show_label = true
show_region...
12017-07-09 13:56:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

Please keep in mind that the correct spelling of tags is very important in OSM - otherwise software can not understand the meaning. E.g. this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505828897
There must be no capital letters ("Yes", "Wheelchair", "Wid...
22017-07-10 12:24:23 UTCvirvv Hello Jan,

Thank you very much for your comments.

Regards

Vir
12017-07-06 08:36:37 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du gibst bei deinen Ergänzungen von Hofläden verschiedene Webseiten als Quelle an. Ich habe mehrere davon überprüft und auf keiner einen Hinweis gefunden, dass die Daten frei verwendet werden dürfen. In OSM dürfen nur Daten eingetragen werden, deren Lizenz kompa...
22017-07-07 09:53:03 UTCmartindick56 Hallo "mueschel",
Vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Würde das nun heissen, dass alle Webseiten-Verweise gelöscht werden müssten? Und wie steht es mit den anderen Informationen zu den erwähnten Hofläden, welche z.B. von Telsearch stammen?
Natürlich kö...
32017-07-07 11:15:12 UTCmueschel Ich weiß es nicht, aber ich fürchte, dass telesearch da durchaus eine Klausel in den Nutzungsbedingungen hat, die nur die persönliche Nutzung erlaubt, aber nicht die kommerzielle Weitergabe. (OSM selbst ist zwar nicht kommerziell, aber die Daten dürfen dann auch für kommerz...
42017-07-07 12:34:02 UTCmartindick56 Schön, das ganze scheint sich noch weiter zu komplizieren...
Schau mal auf der webseite www.anhbl.ch nach. Dort habe ich alle Organisationen und Körperschaften (Gemeinden, Bürgergemeinden, Naturschutzorganisationen, Stiftungen, alles was im engeren und weiteren Sinn mit Natur- und He...
52017-07-08 08:00:49 UTCSimonPoole Einzelne Informationen von den Webseiten der Objekte (den Hofläden) zu übernehmen ist wohl weitestgehend problemlos, was aber nicht geht, ist ohne Erlaubnis Verzeichnisse und Sammlungen solcher Informationen zu nutzen ohne Erlaubnis (die Ersteller solcher Verzeichnisse haben ja meistens au...
62017-07-11 13:02:29 UTCmartindick56 Lieber Simon,
Ich werde bei den Verzeichnis-Anbietern (es sind etwa 10 verschiedene) nachfragen und bei fehlender Erlaubnis ihren Eintrag unter Source löschen.

Freundliche Grüsse
Martin
72017-07-11 19:45:53 UTCmartindick56 Hallo zusammen,
Inzwischen habe ich bei https://www.falstaff.at nachgefragt und per Mail die Erlaubnis gekriegt, diese Daten für Kartierungen zu nutzen. Wo soll diese Information abgelegt werden. Weiss jemad darüber Bescheid?
12017-07-05 11:28:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
the key "bike_friend" has not been used anywhere in OSM so far. I guess you mean "motorcycle_friendly" - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Amotorcycle_friendly

And: Please don't forget to add comments to changesets!

Jan
22017-07-05 12:43:43 UTCHammershoej Hi,
bike_friend is a new tag. It is used to show that the location in question is registered as bike friendly. It is a programme offered by the local tourist organisation for Southern Funen:
http://www.visitsvendborg.dk/denmark/vil-du-vaere-bike-friend

It is on my to-do list to write documentat...
32017-07-05 12:46:23 UTCHammershoej As to writing changeset comments, I admit to skipping. This is a limit to both Potlatch and iD. It simply takes too much time when there is a seperate changeset for each of 90 changes. Problem is that for each point I have to return to the main page, search for the location and then edit. I can't do...
42017-07-05 12:49:23 UTCmueschel The term "bike" is not used in OSM because it is ambiguous - it could be motorcycle of bicycle. i suggest to follow the existing tagging scheme of "motorcycle_friendly" and use "bicycle_friendly".

Apart from that, if you add data from an external source, you have to ...
52017-07-05 13:52:07 UTCHammershoej License: I know this of cause and have cleared it before starting.

As to naming, I see your point, but I also find it counter-intuitive to tag a programme called 'Bike Friend' as 'cycle_friend'.

Please hold your horses and questions until I have written the documentation.
12017-07-05 11:35:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this object? You changed the park to a huge highway. I guess this was a mistake...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6148865/history

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-03 10:50:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
I understand that it is important to collect information about emergency plans. But I don't think it helps to add hundreds of nodes without any meaningful tag. This data is just in the database, but no tool will be able to find these nodes or display them in any meaningful way.
22017-07-03 11:28:58 UTCbsmith54 Hi,
Thank you so much for catching this! I'm working on a project in collaboration with the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, and completely missed this (incredibly important!) observation. I'll make sure to go back and update those nodes appropriately. Any additional insights you have would ...
12017-07-03 09:02:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
did you really want to add this huge amount of foreign tags to ways like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105028180

Jan
22017-07-03 11:32:41 UTCLogicalViolinist No I didnt sorry about that. I'll get it corrected when I have access to a computer. Thanks for spotting it.
32017-07-04 14:44:31 UTCLogicalViolinist I've corrected the issues. Thank you for pointing it out.
12017-07-02 14:08:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added a strange tag to the three lifts here:
abandoned:aerialway=drag_lift = forest
Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-02 21:37:59 UTCSembola Corrected, I really don't know what happened...
Thanks for checking
12017-07-02 13:59:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
sure you can add the name in any language. You have to find the 3-letter code of the language (wikipedia is very helpful) and add it to the name key.
If it's not a language, but just a different name, you can use e.g. old_name or loc_name keys.

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-09 18:22:15 UTCSupaplex 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯! 歡迎加入開放街圖,群眾共同參與,繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料,歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ta...
12017-07-02 13:54:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of tags. I just fixed several:
addr:sity -> addr:city,
nameaddr:housenumber -> addr:housenumber
I don't know if I catched all, please check.

Jan
12017-07-01 10:36:53 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was hat es mit dem Key "ref (OHA)" auf sich, das du hier benutzt? Hat sich die Straßennummer geändert, dann ist der Platz für die alte Nummer der Key "old_ref". Und gib bitte in deinen Changesets auch die Quelle der Änderungen und einen Kommentar an.\...
22017-07-01 15:00:34 UTCdocschenk Hallo Jan, grundsätzlich ist mir bekannt, dass old_ref der richtige Key wäre. Nur was macht man, wenn der reif öfter wechselt? Der Landkreis Osterode hat mit Göttingen fusioniert, alle Kreisstraßen des Altkreises OHA bekommen jetzt eine 400er Nummer (7 -> 407 usw.). Da d...
32017-07-01 17:12:05 UTCmueschel Ich würde diese Information weglassen. old_ref akzeptiert auch mehrere Werte, getrennt durch ";". Wenn du den OHA noch erwähnen willst, geht etwas wie
old_ref:OHA, das benutzt die übliche Syntax eines namespaces. Das würde ich aber nur zusätzlich zum gängigen...
12017-07-01 09:38:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
in this edit you used some keys like these to map destinations:
colour:back:backward
colour:text:backward
direction:backward

Typically, other keys are used, like 'destination' and 'destination:colour'. Could you have a look and adapt to this scheme? Here is a Wiki page with some examples:...
12017-07-01 09:25:04 UTCmueschel Could you check this import as well? These tags don't look they belong to OSM:

J_DESC=2.1.1.1 - prevalentemente seminativi senza vegetazione sparsa
area_mq=291039.54
clc_lvl1=2
clc_lvl2=21
clc_lvl3=211
clc_lvl4=2111
id=1199
isolati_ID=143
tipo_area=Non ...
12017-07-01 09:22:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like something went wrong with this import of buildings: They all have tags which should not appear in the OSM database. Could you check this?
E.g.
altezza=2.81
id=2521
isolati_ID=136
layer=0207I-Tettoia O Pensilina Invariato
superficie=168.65
tipoedific=...
12017-06-30 12:58:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
was heißt denn "maxbreight"? Vielleicht maxwidth?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4934180080

Gruß, Jan
22017-07-01 07:47:19 UTCgekapes Hi Jan,

danke, dass Du es gesehen hast. Ich habe schon ausgebessert.
Ich weiss selber nicht, wieso ich es so getaggt habe.

Gruss,
Jeka
12017-06-29 21:07:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several objects with many strange tags. None of them is a tag we typically use. For example this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502831987

Could you have a look and revise the tagging to use common tags?
Cheers, Jan
22017-07-10 23:23:46 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
12017-06-29 07:48:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

you added several points with information about the number of inhabitants. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. Also, our database in case sensitive, all keys have to be in lower case...
12017-06-28 11:44:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, it has many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4930534149

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-28 07:38:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "dbh" on these nodes. It is not used anywhere else up to now - what is meaning of this key?
22017-07-07 17:42:52 UTCUndearius I suppose late is better than never.
DBH is Diameter at Breast Height.
It was part of an ongoing discussion on the import mailing list and has since been converted to circumference.
These nodes will be deleted and replaced with the proper ones.
12017-06-28 07:37:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
all of these ways have many tags which don't seem to belong to the OSM database, e.g.:

date=no
full_id=w667896
ispaved=True
osm_id=667896
osm_type=way
telenav_cy=CHANGED
22017-06-28 12:22:34 UTCioanam_telenav Hello!
Sorry, it was my mistake. I have changed and uploaded the tags according to the OSM database.
32017-06-28 13:19:54 UTCioanam_telenav I have worked on a specific data set and I have accidentally uploaded it. But I have deleted everything that has mistakenly been uploaded. Now it should be fine.
12017-06-27 13:17:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. You added a lot of points here, but none of them has any meaningful tags. Please take your time to read in the OSM Wiki how tagging has to be done to be useful in any application that uses OSM data.
22017-10-13 07:40:18 UTCGerdP I've reverted most of this changeset here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52880303
12017-06-27 11:32:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Tag "lanes2" schauen? Scheint mir eher eine destination in irgendeine Richtung zu sein. Und 'maxspeed:source' sollte eher 'source:maxspeed' heißen.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353516976
Gruß, Jan
12017-06-26 10:34:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
ich habe hier an einigen Knoten Tippfehler korrigiert (sowas wie 'newtork' oder 'public_tranport'). Ich weiß nicht, ob ich alle erwischt habe, vielleicht kannst du auch nochmal drüberschauen. Gruß, Jan
22017-06-26 10:43:39 UTCHairyCoo Danke für deine Aufmerksamkeit! Ich werde noch mal überprüfen! MfG HairyCoo
12017-06-25 17:15:13 UTCmueschel Woher stammt die Information, dass das hier die K246 ist? Schilder habe ich da bis jetzt noch keine sehen können.
22017-06-25 18:56:46 UTCfurban das habe ich wohl hier gelesen https://www.karben.de/rathaus-buergerservice/projekte/nordumgehung/
32017-06-25 19:05:44 UTCTourenbikerFKB http://www.deges.de/Startseite/L-3351-Ortsumgehung-Karben-eroeffnet-E1440.htm

Hier wird sie als L3351. Die frühere L3351 durch den Ortskern wurde zurückgestuft.

Am besten mal bei Hessen Mobil erkundigen.
42017-06-25 19:06:28 UTCTourenbikerFKB ...soll heißen: mit L3351 bezeichnet.
52017-06-25 20:27:01 UTCmueschel Genau, sie soll die L3351 werden. Habe aber keine Beschilderung gesehen, dass das schon passiert ist.
62017-06-26 06:03:28 UTCfurban Dann bau es doch um. Kann man ja immer noch wieder anders machen. Aber es klingt ja nur logisch das diese Straße eher mal ein Lxxx als ein Kxxx sein sollte.
12017-06-25 18:11:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "lcr_ref" to several roads - did you mean "lcn_ref"?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-25 18:16:55 UTCSebastian Pleško yes. i'm going to soon remove it anyway and make "relations" instead. i finally got a map from the local municipality (was really hard to find) where exactly the bicycle paths go.
12017-06-24 20:25:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "ScientificName" on some nodes - in OSM we have the tag "species" (as well as "genus") for that. If you want to tag the English name of the species, you can use "species:en".

Jan
22017-06-29 22:21:06 UTCSK53 Also the key taxon (effectively synonymous with species a lot of the time, but most useful when cultivars come into play as with many stree trees)
12017-06-24 20:15:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
Kannst du hier nochmal nach dem payment-Tag schauen? Mit eckigen Klammern kann man da wohl nicht bezahlen :-)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4917650794
22017-06-24 20:18:52 UTCtbm Fixed, thanks!
12017-06-24 20:10:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way just got one strange tag and is missing an "highway" Tag. Could you have a look?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500714135

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-24 18:22:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - too many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502976662
Cheers, Jan
22017-08-16 19:49:21 UTCnaoliv realkaka, esses dados que você utilizou aqui são de onde, por favor?
32017-08-16 20:08:48 UTCrealkaka naoliv, dos setores censitários do IBGE.
42017-08-16 20:12:25 UTCnaoliv Beleza. Valeu!
12017-06-23 18:44:45 UTCmueschel Die Linie 74 hält in Vilbel weder am Bussteig A noch B, sondern ausschließlich an E. Sie war allerdings absichtlich nicht eingetragen, weil es sich dabei nur um 2 Schülerfahrten pro Schultag handelt, und wir solche Schulbusse oft gar nicht erfassen.
22017-06-24 19:27:36 UTCTetiSoft Danke für die Info, habe Linie 74 (die vorher übrigens schon eingetragen war aber IIRC ab Heinrich-Heine-Straße statt Bahnhof fuhr) korrigiert. Habe auch ref und local_ref für die Haltepositionen am Bahnhof gesetzt.
12017-06-23 13:03:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
das Tag hier sieht merkwürdig aus...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2313608108

Gruß, Jan
12017-06-23 12:50:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check the tagging. Email, Phone and Website are no valid keys in OSM.
Also, please don't misuse the description tag for extended advertising texts.
22017-06-28 09:40:20 UTCHilton Hotels Thank you for turning our attention to the wrongly entered tags. All of this has been fixed. Thank you once again.
12017-06-23 12:42:22 UTCmueschel Could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39437968
'maxspeed:f' is not a valid tag.
22017-06-26 06:13:16 UTCalinan_telenav Hello,
Thank you for pointing this out for me. I changed the tag.
Have a nice day,
Alina
12017-06-23 12:41:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
could you explain the meaning of the tags you added here? I don't fully see what you want to express and in the current state it also can not be interpreted by software.
You could have a look to the wiki to see how bus stops are currently mapped.
12017-06-23 12:14:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
the 198 objects you added here contain some rather strange tags:
CODE=WALL
COLOUR_NU=16
GROUP=BuildingL
LENGTH=22.406
NUMBER=1025
TYPE=Line
Where these added by mistake or is there some useful information contained?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-22 08:54:02 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du gibst hier als Quelle ein Buch an - hast du eine schriftliche Genehmigung, diese Daten in OSM zu übernehmen? Die Lizenz unter der Quellen stehen, muss mit der ODbL von OSM kompatibel sein.
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-22 14:37:54 UTCosm_Ralef Hallo Jan,
ich war etwas blauäugig, diese Infos so einzustellen. Bin nicht davon ausgegangen, das die hier schon urherberrechtlich interessant ist, da nur kurze Auszüge mit Quellenangabe. Eine Genehmigung wird auch schwierig, da der Verfasser leider 2001 verstorben ist.

Ich werde alle ...
12017-06-21 20:42:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "litname = no". Did you mean "lit=no"?
www.openstreetmap.org/way/483249177
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-22 14:27:31 UTCLowe253 Hi, mueschel

you guessed right. Already fixed.

Thanks
12017-06-21 20:23:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
between 6th and 7th street you created 3 overlapping roads. Could you check and fix that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-21 19:39:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of this tag?
ata_delete:construction \t2017-06-30
on node http://osm.org/node/2499396427

If there is some temporary construction, it's best to use the "temporary" prefix or "conditional" suffix, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_fea...
12017-06-21 12:36:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
dieser Tag hier stimmt leider auch nicht so ganz:
"access:agricultural:forward:conditional =\tnone @ maxweight"
Keine Gewichtsbeschränkung für landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge wäre

maxweight:forward:conditional = none @ agricultural

Grüße, Jan
22017-06-21 18:30:23 UTCProtoxenus habs geändert......
12017-06-20 21:22:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tags "moped_p" and "moped_a" in this changeset. These are not used very often - moped_P and moped_A are used more often. Could you adapt to this more common spelling of the keys?
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-21 11:53:04 UTCM!dgard Hi Jan

Tags with capital letters don't fit in with the other tags. For example for emergency=aed it was voted explicitly to use lowercase.

I'm aware that moped_A is more popular at the moment, but unless it is standardized to use uppercase (there're only two mentions about it in the wiki, no d...
32017-06-21 12:27:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're right, upper case keys are rare. But looking at the statistics, we have e.g. 550 moped_A, but only 30 moped_a. In my opinion, the best way is to first adopt the more common scheme and in parallel start a discussion in the local community. Then we can do an automated retagging once there ...
42017-06-21 12:39:33 UTCM!dgard (Erratum: it was voted as emergency=defibrillator, not aed, but the vote for the lowercase option got significantly more votes than the uppercase one.)
52017-06-21 12:59:28 UTCM!dgard > the best way is to first adopt the more common scheme and in parallel start a discussion in the local community

The problem is that the discussion will cite usage numbers, they are one of the metrics that are used to do an informal vote. I don't support that though, those are too easily infl...
62017-06-21 13:08:28 UTCM!dgard Matching some more different combinations with the mopeds:

Uppercase: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pVA 706 ways
Lowercase: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pVB 379 ways

So the difference is definitely not an order of magnitude.
12017-06-20 21:30:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
du nutzt hier die Tags
maxweight:lanes:left=12t
mindistance:hgv:lanes:right=50m
Das Suffix :left bzw. :right ist in diesem Zusammenhang nicht definiert - was möchtest du ausdrücken?
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-21 07:27:24 UTCProtoxenus Die Brücke ist so um die 50 Jahre alt und nicht für das andauernde Befahren mit 40t-LKW konstruiert. Deshalb gibt es eine Einschränkung: linker Fahrstreifen Fahrzeuge mit maximal 12t, rechter Fahrstreifen mit minimalem Abstand von 50m für LKW. Das habe ich versucht, umzusetzen.
32017-06-21 07:32:21 UTCmueschel Alles klar, das würde dann so aussehen:
maxweight:lanes = 12t |
mindistance:hgv:lanes = | 50
Bei ":lanes" werden einfach die Eigenschaften aller Spuren aufgezählt, von links nach rechts, getrennt mit "|", Spuren ohne Eigenschaften bleiben leer.
42017-06-21 07:35:38 UTCProtoxenus Ok, daran hatte ich nicht gedacht. Danke für den Hinweis.
12017-06-11 09:18:30 UTCwhb Was bedeutet denn "2017 = 4 km/h"?
z.B. hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118342708
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60175718
22017-06-13 16:07:51 UTCdornweg Was "2017 = 4 km/h" bedeutet würde mich auch interessieren. Der Eintrag war schon vorhanden, und ich wollte ihn nicht einfach löschen.
32017-06-20 19:59:36 UTCmueschel Da muss ich dich leider enttäuschen, den Tag gibt es erst seit diesem Changeset. Ich lösche ihn dann mal.
12017-06-20 11:10:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found a speling mistake on 43 ways: area:higway instead of area:highway - could you have a look and fix it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-20 19:50:29 UTCCiemek Hi
I corrected spelling mistakes
12017-06-20 11:08:19 UTCmueschel Please stop adding new objects and sort out your spelling mistakes. Most of the data you added is completely useless because of spelling mistakes. It's likely we have to fully delete it because it would take days to clean everything up by hand.
12017-06-19 10:56:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many objects with foreign tags which don't look like they should appear in OSM data, e.g.
ALAND=0
AWATER=433
HYDROID=110783668525
INTPTLAT=+35.5385696
INTPTLON=-93.4273783
MTFCC=H2030

Could you have a look and clean this up?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-19 10:48:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw you added the tag "width:parking:lane:both" on several ways. This tag is not used in any other place up to now. In other places, the tag is "parking:lane:both:width". Could you change this to the common tag?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-21 04:13:55 UTCtheangrytomato Whoops, sorry about that. Should have it fixed tonight!
Bradley
12017-06-19 10:20:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check all your tagging of nodes for correctness. Spelling is very important! Most of these tags with spelling mistakes were added by you and can not be used at all in OSM:

add: city\t
add:city\t
add:place\t
add:street\t
addr : city\t
addr : street\t
Addr:\t
Addr: city\t...
12017-06-17 08:13:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
du hast hier Tags wie 'roadbike-smoothness', 'roadbike:soothness' und 'roadbike:smoothness' hinzugefügt, jeweils etwa 80 Mal.
Diese Tags gibt es bisher nicht, und sie entsprechen auch nicht den üblichen Taggingregeln.
a) 2 davon haben Schreibfehler, das letzte ist das korrekteste.
...
22017-06-17 08:46:06 UTCmatchman Hallo Jan,
ähnlich dem mtb:scale tag geht es mir darum die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit aus der Sicht eines Rennradfahrers darzustellen und diese zu klassifizieren. Der smoothness key ist hierfür leider nicht präzise genug.
Ich würde den key in smoothness:roadbike ändern...
32017-06-19 08:51:30 UTCmueschel Ok. Eine Dokumentation in Form eines Proposals sollte es dann schon geben. Am besten natürlich gleich mit Blick auf alle möglichen Verkehrsteilnehmer, nicht nur auf Radfahrer bezogen.
12017-06-17 18:07:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of tags. Only correctly spelled tags can be used by OSM software.
E.g. I found 40 objects with the tag 'operater', which should read 'operator'.
I didn't check all your edits, but I also found a "amenity=post office" which should be "amenity=po...
12017-06-17 18:03:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found you added several objects with strange tags, like these:
open space =yes
play ground =godwari-14,makhu boou
This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look to the wiki about common
tags for shops or am...
12017-06-16 18:05:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcomr to OSM! Please watch out for the spelling of tags, it's "building", "addr:city" and 'colour'. I corrected some of these,but maybe I missed a few.
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-16 17:57:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging? Looks like name and ele tags somehow got mixed.

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-16 18:15:56 UTCdaniel-ibex Hi - the log cabin shelter is out-of-path - node 4904544425, v2 is independently - cordially

sorry , I do not speak English
12017-06-15 13:39:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4904979640

Looks like something went wrong with the name tag.
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-15 15:25:52 UTCTe-Ika Oh yep, got it fixed, thanks!
12017-06-15 13:37:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "wayID" to several roads. This key is not used anywhere else - what is the meaning? Is it an official number? This is tagged as 'ref' usually.

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-15 13:36:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this tagging: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46615603

The tag "M = 4" looks like a mistake.
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-15 13:29:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw you added some destination tags lately. I would like to point out the usual order of suffixes, e.g.
destination:colour:lanes:backward
(not destination:lanes:colour:backward)

In general, the scheme is:
key[:subkey][:hgv|:bicycle|...][:lanes][:forward|:backward|:both_ways] = *


...
12017-06-14 11:46:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
'socket:schuko:output' wird bis jetzt nicht verwendet, 'socket:schuko:current' ist (auch für andere Stecker) wesentlich verbreiteter.
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-14 13:49:13 UTCschnism Hi,

ich war mir da auch nicht sicher, und habe mich darum am Wiki orientiert:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Auch taginfo sagt leider garnichts dazu:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=charging_station#combinations

Beides mappen ist auch ...
32017-06-14 14:24:38 UTCmueschel Ja, die "Kombinationen" sind da nicht umfassend genug für seltene Tags. Ich habe hier geschaut:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/socket:type2#similar

Unter der Stecker-Tabelle im Wiki taucht "socket:type2:output" tatsächlich auf, wird aber im Gegensatz zu curr...
12017-06-14 12:51:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the spelling of the key "Source:maxspeed" on 90 ways? It should be lower case, 'source:maxspeed'.

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-14 11:59:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the 'capacity:' tag here? Something's missing.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498675775
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-14 11:55:32 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498610347
I guess those tags shouldn't be there, or the way should be closed or part of a relation. And I don't see the meaning of the 'fff' key.

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-14 13:54:52 UTCMichaelCollinson Thanks Jan for finding this. Incomplete edit. I have completed it now.
12017-06-14 11:48:15 UTCmueschel Kann man das wieder löschen?
22017-06-18 08:48:59 UTCRisou Ja
12017-06-14 11:36:38 UTCmueschel This changeset contains another set of 380 misspelled address tags, addr_house,
addr_stree.

Please fix this before uploading!
22017-06-14 14:38:23 UTCAndrew Matheny Corrected in changeset 49531966. Thanks!
12017-06-14 11:31:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
ich habe zwei Tipps zum Erfassen von Wegweisern:
a) wenn du Keys wie 'direction_west_1' benutzt, schreibe 'direction_west:1', das ist die übliche Form zum Nummerieren.
b) Ich empfehle Relationen um solche Schilder zu erfassen, das ist wesentlich genauer und einfacher auszuwerten, siehe: ...
12017-06-13 10:52:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this container?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4896938441

"domestic_oil" is not used as a key up to now. Maybe "recycling:cooking_oil = yes"?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-13 10:49:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Namen schauen? Da stimmt das Tagging nicht.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29468157

Gruss, Jan
12017-06-13 10:48:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this place node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4898346197

"Lera = asphalt" looks like a mistake.
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-13 10:59:15 UTCzvenzzon Thanks a lot, it's now corrected.
12017-06-13 10:38:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag you put on this node looks a bit strange:
xmas \t= Traffic calming bump
Did you mean "traffic_calming = bump"?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-13 12:50:31 UTCszydzio Hi! Yes indeed, I meant traffic_calming = bump. I was just an old node imported by OsmAnd which for some unknown reason adds this strange tag. I cleaned it up - thanks for the hint!
12017-06-13 10:35:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier nochmal über die Adressen schauen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497998566
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497998573
Tags wie dieses sehen nach einem Fehler aus:
89a = Am Winkel

Gruß, Jan
12017-06-13 10:25:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier gibt es 97 Bäume mit dem Tag "de:genus". Das sollte richtig "genus:de" heißen. Schaust du da bitte nochmal drüber?

Gruß, Jan
22017-06-13 12:05:23 UTCkartonage Uff, richtig blöder Dreher. Habe es korrigiert, danke!
12017-06-13 10:23:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your edits in this area I saw about 80 cases of a spelling mistake "destionation" instead of "destination". Could you please check this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-12 10:54:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this barrier and the one close by?
http://osm.org/node/4895536995
The tag "hoy =30" looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-12 12:31:35 UTCAllroads Yes, changed it. i can not clarify, why this tag. I believe, I merged it. And was already there.
12017-06-12 10:40:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "source=google" here. Please not that information from google is not allowed to be added in OSM due to the terms of usage / licenses. Please remove the information you got from Google, otherwise we might have to delete the whole object.
Jan
12017-06-11 10:34:31 UTCmueschel Moin,
kannst du bitte hier nochmal über die Adressen schauen? Das Tag "addr:coutry=DE" sollte eigentlich "addr:country=DE" sein - ist aber eigentlich auch unnötig, weil Grenzen bei uns sehr gut erfasst sind.

Gruß, Jan
22017-06-12 10:47:37 UTCJanisJf Ja war ein doofer fortgeführter copy & paste Rechtschreibfehler :O Hab es schon gefixt.
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49464049)
12017-06-11 10:30:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 3 nodes with strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4895835026
Looks like something went wrong with importing your GPS data. Could you have a look?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-11 10:36:47 UTCAndersAndersson Hello,
Thanks for pointing that out. I add a lot of nodes from my GPS surveys. Sometimes I forget to remove the extra data that my Garmin GPS device adds. I have fixed that node now, and will do a search for similar data with overpass-turbo.eu.
12017-06-11 10:22:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "alt_ name" to 31 streets. Could you fix the spelling of the key, there should be no space, like "alt_name".

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-07 20:15:57 UTCtrigpoint Hi, this gate looks a little wrong as it has 3 ways connecting to it. It needs to be separate from the junction otherwise it is impossible to tell which routes pass through the gate,
Cheers Phil
22017-06-07 20:17:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
that's not my work, it was added by http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49075370

Cheers, Jan
32017-06-07 20:46:10 UTCtrigpoint Hi Jan
Sorry, I will see if I can work it out.

Cheers Phil
12017-06-07 11:52:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several objects with strange tags like 54 =77
601 =77
Could you check that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-07 11:38:50 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM. Bitte schau mal ins Wiki, wie Addressen und POIs bezeichnet werden müssen. All diese Informationen sind z.Z. nicht auswertbar, weil sie nicht dem normalen Schema entsprechen.

adress \tEinener Dorfbauerschaft 30
ort \tWarendorf
plz \t48231
telefon \t4925841666\...
12017-06-07 11:28:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
das Tag "capacity:undisabled" gibt es bis jetzt nirgends sonst. Warum nicht das normale "capacity:disabled"?

Gruss, Jan
12017-05-31 13:10:21 UTCholgerd the field paper: http://fieldpapers.org/snapshots/3dsblppm#17/52.49256790905722/13.42859263080393
22017-06-06 11:00:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du diesen Node nochmal überprüfen bzgl Toiletten?

Gruß, Jan

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/700732539

toilets:wheelchair \tno
toilets:wheelchair_1 \tyes
12017-06-06 10:56:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
this is another set of nodes with no valid tag, but a lot of foreign stuff. Please clean up your data before importing it to OSM!

Jan
12017-06-06 10:38:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this roundabout? It has several strange tags.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496820690

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-08 00:10:19 UTCSunfishtommy I took away the tags I don't know where they came from.
12017-06-05 20:39:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "dsscreated=#brunch" on several POIs, could you explain it?

Btw, please have a look to the Wiki about tagging of opening_hours - there is a well defined syntax to make it machine-readable.

Jan
12017-06-05 20:34:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put these tags on some ways:

maxweight = 3.5
maxweight:condition = yes @ service
The conditional tag doesn't seem to be right (yes is not a valid value for maxweight and @ service is not defined)

Can you explain what you want to tag here?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-05 20:37:43 UTCYod4z the way is limited to 3.5 t but if the hgv is for service (trash, road construction...) it can go even if it has more than 3.5t.
12017-06-05 20:32:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
schaust du hier mal nach dem Versuch des Öffnungszeiten-Taggings? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496768509
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-05 20:47:43 UTCbielebog Ui, gut gesehen. Das war natürlich Quatsch und ist nun entfernt.
12017-06-04 19:23:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you checkt the tagging of this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494161242
The tag looks a bit strange:
"3 =\tcement_block"

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-04 19:06:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 115 ways have the key "operater", which should read "operator". Could you have a look and fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-05 02:12:47 UTCSupaplex Sure, I'll fix it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49254949
12017-06-04 19:00:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tags
"Gresham Street=no" and "Winchester Walk = no" in your edits. Could you explain this?

Thanks, Jan
22017-06-04 20:26:47 UTCMacLondon Sorry, these were pasted in error. I have removed them both,
Thanks, Mac
12017-06-03 16:46:14 UTCkreuzschnabel Diese Änderung hat Teile der Burgstraße etwa 300 m nach Westen verschoben, fast zum Bahnhof, und zehn andere, damit verbundene Straßen gleich hinterher! Sieht wild aus, ich bekomme das nicht auf die Schnelle sortiert. Baust du das bitte _gleich_ wieder zurück?

Leider haben ...
22017-06-03 19:13:39 UTCmueschel Großteils korrigiert in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49227401
Direkt am Platz östlich der Burg stimmt noch eine Kleinigkeit nicht, und die living_street-Fläche mit durchgehenden Straßen sieht merkwürdig aus, liegt aber nicht an diesem Changeset.
32017-06-04 10:38:02 UTCfkMohr Ich bitte vielmals um Entschuldigung!
Wollte lediglich die Wanderweg-Route aktualisieren. Als ich das mit den Straßen dann sah, wollte ich alles rückgängig machen, fand aber keine Möglichkeit mehr dazu.
Kann man bereits gespeicherte Änderungen nicht mehr unwirksam machen?...
42017-06-04 10:51:22 UTCkreuzschnabel Das mit dem Straßen-Ziehen muss ein Versehen gewesen sein; da waren wohl noch einige Nodes selektiert und sind dann mit der Maus mitgewandert. Wanderrouten werden in OSM als Relationen abgebildet, in denen die betreffenden Straßen(abschnitte) drin sind oder nicht; dazu muss eine Stra&szl...
52017-06-04 11:03:30 UTCfkMohr Danke; ich hatte nach einer "Verschiebemöglichkeit" für die Wanderwege gesucht, aber nicht gefunden und hatte daher nicht mehr richtige Teile gelöscht und wollte die geänderte Route einfügen. Derzeit sind alle drei Routen (26, 28 & 29, wieso zweimal 28?) unterb...
62017-06-04 11:35:54 UTCfkMohr Teilweise wurde die Führung von Weg 29 durch Weg 26 ersetzt; möglicherweise gibt es auch dafür ein Funktion, so dass Löschen und Neuerstellen nicht optimal wäre.
72017-06-04 12:17:25 UTCkreuzschnabel Mein Hund lässt ausrichten, wenn du noch was im Kühlschrank hast, können wir auch gern einen kleinen Ausflug nach Oberjosbach unternehmen und uns das gemeinsam anschauen.
82017-06-04 12:50:16 UTCfkMohr Ich bin zu Hause (Bohnheck 20, unweit BZO); nur Hundefutter habe ich nicht.
92017-06-04 13:08:58 UTCkreuzschnabel Dann sach ich ma, wir stehen gegen 16 Uhr vor der Tür von http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368529588. Eventuelle Katzen am besten außer Sicht schaffen :-)
102017-06-04 13:19:29 UTCfkMohr Freue mich, Euch kennenzulernen ...
12017-06-03 13:43:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
these wells contain quite some foreign tags. E.g. lon and lat should not appear as tags in OSM, keys should not use capital letters. Could you have a look and correct this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-02 10:52:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
did you really mean "bear = yes"?
And, could you move the node to one side of the road? I guess the restaurant is not in the middle of the street?
12017-06-02 10:45:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier gibt es einige Nodes mit ungewöhnlichen Tags wie "GB 58; GH = path". Könntest du da mal nachschauen und korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan
22017-06-07 10:54:39 UTCwhb Danke für den Hinweis!
Habe die Fehler verbessert.
12017-06-02 10:43:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added more than 30 ways with the tag "Highway=Footway" - please note that all tags are case sensitive and these should be lower case.

Also, elevators are tagged "min level" and "max level". According to the wiki, this should be e.g. "level = 0;1;2;3&quo...
22017-08-22 15:01:03 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check highway=0
What was meant ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496450447
12017-06-02 10:30:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several objects with very strange tags here, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496152016
area=89.7593806393
cota_p_a=55.41
fotografia=0
gid=44424
id_edifica=44424
id_lev=0.0
latlon=40°32'4.418"N 8°27'43.439"W
perimetro=56.7...
12017-05-31 09:53:38 UTCfreeExec please revert
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Lifecycle_prefix_.28.3Cstatus.3E:.3Ckey.3E_.3D_.3Cvalue.3E.29
22017-05-31 10:12:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
both versions are in use. The reason for my edit was your spelling mistake "constraction"
32017-05-31 15:50:07 UTCfreeExec It was necessary to correct the typo.
And now marked by a kind of amenity that does not exist in reality. Secondly, after the opening, more work is done to return the tag.
42017-05-31 16:25:37 UTCmueschel Alright, I changed it back.
12017-05-31 09:09:03 UTCopendcc Bicycle = official on a non rectangular building? Are you sure?
22017-05-31 09:19:28 UTCmueschel You're right, that's strange. I didn't put the tag there. I fixed the spelling of the key, but didn't notice it being strange for a building.

We have to ask rowers2, e.g. in this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48947839
12017-05-29 16:05:25 UTCMarkus366 Hallo,
dieser und weitere Abschnitte einer geplanten/ im Bau befindlichen Straßen wurden zuletzt mehrfach von verschiedenen Nutzern unterschiedlich getaggt. Häufig wurden die Schlüssel highway:construction , trunk: und construction: hin und her geändert. Vielleicht können ...
22017-05-29 17:14:33 UTCmueschel Siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48979895
12017-05-29 16:02:49 UTCMarkus366 Hallo,
dieser und weitere Abschnitte einer geplanten/ im Bau befindlichen Straßen wurde zuletzt mehrfach von verschiedenen Nutzern unterschiedliche getaggt. Häufig wurden die Schlüssel highway:construction , trunk: und construction: hin und her geändert. Vielleicht können...
22017-05-29 16:29:13 UTCMrWebber Hallo,
Ich weiß gar nicht wo das Problem noch liegt. Ich habe alle Fehler verbessert.

Gruß MrWebber
32017-05-29 17:14:17 UTCmueschel Dann kommentiere ich auch hier und nicht in meinem Changeset:
Erst highway = proposed, dann highway = construction (zunächst mit Tippfehler den ich korrigiert habe). Die letzte Änderung von t2425 verstehe ich nicht ganz, aber das hast du dann ja wieder geradegezogen.
12017-05-28 10:53:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded many objects with very strange tags here, like these:

addr:place \t02050
building \ttran thanh toan
highway \tdhok
landuse \t16092737352
place \t0340302730
shop \t56/26

This looks like something went wrong during an import. Can this be reverted?
Jan
12017-05-28 10:50:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "traffic_signals:directions" 16 times - the correct spelling would be "traffic_signals:direction". Could you fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-28 10:42:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495243526
The tag "loading zone = yes" doesn't exist yet.
Would these tags be what you try to express?
highway = service
area = yes
vehicle = delivery
?
22017-05-29 17:42:52 UTCLAEM Hi,

Yes, thank you.
12017-05-28 10:35:59 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ich habe hier an einigen Nodes den Key "slope_curb" gesehen, "sloped_curb" wäre richtig. Schaust du da mal nach?
Gruß, Jan
22017-05-28 16:04:00 UTCemga Hopla, das sollte natürlich nicht sein, da hab ich mich vertippt. Schau es mir an!
32017-05-28 16:22:42 UTCemga Sollte passen, Danke für den Hinweis
12017-05-28 10:34:32 UTCmueschel Moin,
habe hier an 11 Nodes den Key "sloped_curbs" gesehen - "sloped_curb" wäre richtig.

Gruß, Jan
22017-05-28 11:14:07 UTCThoschi Hi,
danke für den Hinweis. Habe aber jetzt auf die Schnelle nur 6 Nodes wiedergefunden (und geändert).
Gruß Thorsten
12017-05-28 10:22:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4868074917
The tag seems strange:
5653 = sv:Gora_Sad-Ishtrag
22017-05-28 17:05:30 UTCgosausee @mueschel:
thx 4 your info. i changed it!
12017-05-28 10:19:45 UTCmueschel Hi, something went wrong here: You didn't "remove unnecesary tags", but added 100 nodes with just a strange "@id" tag.
Could you fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-05-29 05:55:40 UTCmarianp_telenav Done! Thank's!
Regards, Marian
12017-05-26 09:02:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "barriere = all" on 24 ways - looks like a mistake. Did you mean "barrier = wall"?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-26 08:59:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
deine erste Version "bus_bay =left" ist die laut Wiki korrekte. Das Suffix :left soll nur verwendet werden um weitere Eigenschaften anzugeben. Und ist auch nur dann nötig, wenn bus_bay = both und die Eigenschaften auf beiden Seiten unterschiedlich sind.

Gruß, Jan
22017-05-26 10:28:49 UTCToniE Danke Jan,

dann werde ich mal in mich gehen und nachvollziehen, wo ich das bisher schon gemapped habe. Außer hier wohl nur am westlichen Teil der Truderinger Straße - glaub' ich.

Gruß
Toni
12017-05-24 18:44:32 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert - viele Gebäudedetails gelöscht.
22017-05-24 18:46:28 UTCmueschel Zur Information: Die meisten Gebäude am Campus waren mit vollständigem 3D-Mapping erfasst, siehe z.B. hier:
http://maps.osm2world.org/?zoom=18&lat=50.17364&lon=8.63088&layers=B0TTFF
Die meisten dieser Informationen wurden hier gelöscht.
12017-05-24 18:40:29 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert (Dach gelöscht)
12017-05-24 18:38:44 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert - doppelter POI node, Löschen von existierenden Objekten.
12017-05-24 18:36:52 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert (Löschen von Gebäudedetails)
12017-05-24 09:06:25 UTCmueschel Warum hast du hier alle Informationen zu den Gebäuden (Aussehen, Höhe etc.) gelöscht?
22017-05-24 09:12:12 UTCGoetheUniversitaet Sorry, wenn das so war, dann ohne Absicht. Kannst du es wieder zurücksetzen?
Sind noch neu, kennen uns noch nicht so gut aus. Wir ergänzen auch gleich unser Profil mit weiteren Infos.
32017-05-24 18:35:44 UTCmueschel Ich habe diese Löschung eines Gebäudeteils und Gebäudedetails revertiert.
12017-05-24 18:35:32 UTCmueschel Ich habe diese Löschung eines existierenden Gebäudeteils revertiert.
12017-05-24 11:30:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way got many strange tags - could you check this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494283585
altitudeMode = null
begin = null
building = yes
description = null
drawOrder = null
end = null
extrude = 0
icon = null
postal = yes
tessellate = -1
timestamp = nul...
12017-05-24 11:21:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw the tag "being=sourse" on many objects. Did you want to write "source = bing"?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-18 08:15:59 UTCJean-Marc Liotier Jan, you could safely assume so... Or was that pedagogical rhetoric ? Anyway, I made the corrections in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51224977
12017-05-23 20:39:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your edits you used the keys
faa:LFSN
faa:LSFN
FAA:LSFN
Could you use just one spelling?
Jan
22017-05-23 20:40:25 UTCmueschel Addendum: FAA:LFSN is used 52 times already
32017-05-24 13:35:32 UTCmicahcochran I'll try to do better spelling it. You are correct that it should be FAA:LFSN. This is "FAA's Landing Facility Site Number". I should probably remove it when there is some other kind of ID.
Thanks,
Micah
12017-05-23 17:26:29 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM!
I found tags like
Jumlah Lantai=1
Kedalaman Pondasi=1 meter
Material Bangunan=Balok Semen
Ventilasi=ada
jenis atap=genteng
jenis lantai=Keramik
on several objects.
This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software c...
12017-05-22 10:19:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 1880 objects with tags like "@id = way/5678989" This looks like a mistake - could you have a look and fix it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-22 19:41:02 UTCTheDutchMan13 Yeah i'll check it out now
32017-05-24 14:44:05 UTCTheDutchMan13 Reverted due to unknown errors
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48949502
42017-05-24 14:44:33 UTCTheDutchMan13 Should be fixed now. Took me a few days to figure it out.
12017-05-21 17:52:52 UTCmueschel Moin,
du hast dieser Straße zwei maxspeeds verpasst, kannst du das mal nachprüfen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177853840/history
22017-05-21 21:32:51 UTCPrince Kassad das war definitiv nicht beabsichtigt. Anscheinend hatte vorher jede Fahrtrichtung ein unterschiedliches maxspeed (30 hin und 50 zurück), woraus dann beim Zusammenfügen "maxspeed=30;50" wurde. Ohne vor Ort gewesen zu sein müsste man aber raten, ob jetzt 30 oder 50 gilt. Was d...
32017-05-21 21:36:42 UTCPrince Kassad Ich hab gerade gesehen dass es für die Ecke frische Mapillary-Bilder gibt. Demnach ist definitiv 30 richtig (ist eine Tempo-30-Zone), 50 ist Schmarrn. Hab das auch schon korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48871202
12017-05-21 16:48:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found four buildings with the tag "ODK =OMK". Looks like a mistake, could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-26 05:15:39 UTCmmahmud Hi, thanks for showing me this. Somehow it got pasted on the features. I will correct them.
:)
12017-05-20 15:39:59 UTCmueschel Diese Straße ist nicht komplett gesperrt, sondern z.Z. nur ein kleiner Abschnitt westlich des Waldes.
12017-05-20 13:45:25 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier in den letzten Jahren ja so einige Wanderrouten eingetragen. Bei den Längenangaben mit dem "distance" Tag hast du aber Kommazahlen benutzt anstelle des in OSM üblichen englischen Punktes als Dezimaltrenner. Würdest du da vielleicht bei Gelegenheit einen ...
22017-06-05 09:28:53 UTCHGSandhagen Hallo Jan,

ich habe die Distanzen der Wanderrouten "OSM-konform" geändert.
Gruß, Hans-Gerd
12017-05-20 13:18:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
ich finde hier einige Wege, bei denen du das "incline" Tag geändert hast, z.B. von "2%" auf den merkwürdigen Text "up,_down,_5%". Könntest du das bitte wieder korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan
12017-05-19 10:48:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you used these tags to describe the Symbol for this route?
background \tred_frame
foreground1 \tred_rectangle
foreground2 \twhite_rectangle

We do have the key "osmc:symbol" to describe such symbols.

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-19 08:54:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw that you are adding destination tags to roads. I would like to remind you that the order of the parts of a key is important, it should always be:
key[:subkey][:lanes][:forward|:backward]
e.g.
destination:colour:lanes:backward

I saw a few keys where this order is mixed.
Cheers, Jan
12017-05-19 08:46:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check this import of nodes? All of them have many foreign keys which should not appear in the OSM data base. The one common key (building=yes) should not be there, because these nodes are not the actual building, which are already in the database.
Jan

http://www.openstreetm...
12017-05-16 10:50:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
some of the ways have strange tags, can they be removed? All necessary information is contained in the relations you added as well.
E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492834831

Jan
22017-07-26 18:39:01 UTCSAnugroho Sorry, late response. Already fixed by changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49180151 Thank you.
12017-05-16 10:44:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? It has only foreign keys:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492361529

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-26 18:20:27 UTCSAnugroho Sorry, late respond. Fixed by changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50566679 Thank you.
12017-05-16 10:36:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of keys. On 35 nodes I found "water_tankt:housenumber" instead of "water_tank:housenumber" Could you have a look and correct these?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-16 10:35:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
I would like to point you to the "Date Namespace": This makes historical entries like yours much easier to read, e.g.
Instead of:
was:2:name \tБородинская улица
was:2:name:end_date \t1918
was:2:name:fi \tBorodinonkatu
was:2:name:ru \tБородинская ули...
12017-05-14 17:54:29 UTCPeilscheibe Hallo mueschel, gibt es irgendeinen besonderen Grund für die Entfernung einer zutreffenden Information? Wurde das Schild geändert?
22017-05-14 17:57:03 UTCmueschel Die Information war doppelt vorhanden. Ich habe nur eine der beiden Angaben "Rietheim 4.3 km;Terrassenfreibad 0.4 km" entfernt.
32017-05-14 20:52:04 UTCPeilscheibe Das war kein Duplikat, das war ein Hinweis auf einen Fehler am Schild. Genauer: was Du gelöscht hast, ist exakt der Text, der auf dem Schild steht (*:signposted). Ich habe das mal wiederhergestellt.
42017-05-14 20:59:30 UTCmueschel Dann schreib doch da bitte eine note="Schreibfehler 'Terasse' auch auf Schild vorhanden", das verstehen dann auch andere Mapper. Neu erfundene Tags, deren Wert eine (fast) Kopie eines anderen Tags sind, versteht niemand und verwirren nur.
12017-05-08 18:50:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
What did you try to add to the database? All nodes you added have some foreign tags which should not be here, and don't have any meaningful ones.
Jan
22017-05-14 14:14:45 UTCmueschel I just reverted these edits as they did not contain any valuable additional information to data already existing.
32017-05-14 20:43:07 UTCgeow Hi cstp, if you are intending to create a route for ski mountaineering (scialpinismo), you might use a route relation
with "type=route + route=piste + piste:type=skitour" see
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4663751 or
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5280864

Ciao
geow\...
12017-05-13 13:00:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the key "gateway = yes" on this node - did you mean "barrier = gate"?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4838972161

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-13 11:41:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found some ways with all foreign tags, and no usual OSM tags:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/p1l
Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan
22017-05-13 19:38:58 UTCRichard L Fixed my one and also another one I found. Thanks for notifying
12017-05-12 10:58:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the Korean key on this relation:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6939871/history
It's new and I don't really see where it comes from.
Jan
22017-05-12 21:06:15 UTCpyram Sorry, maybe a copy&paste-error (no idea).
Thanks for the error check.
Now I fixed the needless one-way-relation too (=> way).
mueschel has contributed to 500 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 965 comment(s) (limit: 500 changesets)