OpenStreetMap (OSM) Changeset Discussions

Changeset	No.	Date	Contributor	Comment

51038728 by carto2017udec	1	2017-08-17 10:55:00 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added tags like this one to more than 200 objects. Could you have a look and remove them? extensions \t<extensions xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ogr="http://osgeo.org/gdal" xmlns="http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1"> <o...

50999441 by mrbojangles	1	2017-08-17 10:45:21 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added some ways with only strange tags like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514499767 Could you have a look and fix this? Cheers, Jan

51178996 by LogicalViolinist	1	2017-08-17 10:40:13 UTC	mueschel	Hi, it looks like this and another changeset added 51 objects with strange tags like these: ADDRTYPE=SUBORD FULLADDR=20 MALACHIGAN, CROISSANT DU PI_MUNICIP=__AK2WLJ POINT_X=383815.2027 POINT_Y=5034062.8701
	2	2017-08-17 11:30:45 UTC	LogicalViolinist	Sorry about that, ill remove them
	3	2017-08-17 12:18:55 UTC	LogicalViolinist	Corrected in: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51203524

51074003 by Ast adhikari	1	2017-08-16 10:56:04 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the key 'estd:' to various objects. This key is not yet used in any other place. I guess you should use "start_date" instead, which is used everywhere else. Also, please use the Gregorian Calendar for dates - otherwise data can not be easily understood by any OSM tool. \...

51024383 by rojipokhara	1	2017-08-16 10:55:28 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the key 'estd:' to various objects. This key is not yet used in any other place. I guess you should use "start_date" instead, which is used everywhere else. Also, please use the Gregorian Calendar for dates - otherwise data can not be easily understood by any OSM tool. \...

51152104 by bibi6	1	2017-08-16 10:33:51 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added a new key here, and used several different spellings: FR:grande_circulation fr:grande_circulation fr:grande_circulation_1 OSM Tags are case sensitive, could you change them to a common spelling? Additionally, we usually don't put a language code in front of a tag. It should be...
	2	2017-08-16 12:23:31 UTC	bibi6	Hi, Thanks for pointing me this out. I actually wanted to use the FR:grande_circulation tag, but I probably did a wrong manip for the others (unless iD doesn't care about case :/ ) Anyway, taking your second remark into account, I'm going to use grande_circulation instead. (Changeset 51169807 is ...

50192169 by Dylansc	1	2017-08-06 13:09:30 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of these nodes? Most have tags which look like they don't belong to OSM, like these: Lat=32.231613 Lon=-110.971756 STINTERSEC=STONE AV / UNIVERSITY BL Jan
	2	2017-08-06 13:11:03 UTC	mueschel	Addendum: It looks like none of these points is actually part of a road - that is required to be able to use this information e.g. in routing engines.
	3	2017-08-08 21:45:43 UTC	Dylansc	These are all tagged according to People For Bikes OpenStreetMap Tagging Guidelines for HAWKs (signaled crosswalks)... I followed the guidelines listed here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HuAXQUnCEcv9aLZyIDHkLTJ5ZSKfB-U4MlJSmN-1BLk/edit#heading=h.tle1tl5ruh6c These points aren't part of t...
	4	2017-08-08 23:08:41 UTC	mueschel	This document is a good reference. But there is no reference to the keys Lat, Lon, STINTERSEC I mentioned above, which should not be there. Ways consist of points, and the crossing tags need to be on a point that belongs to a way. It's as simple as that.
	5	2017-08-15 22:10:50 UTC	Dylansc	Would the best method for me to fix this be for each 131 nodes: 1. go into "edit with iD" edit mode 2. Delete the 3 unnecessary tags (Lat, Lon, and STINTERSEC) 3. snap it to appropriate intersection/roadway Additionally, I feel I should add some sort of tag that says specifically a H...
	6	2017-08-16 08:11:45 UTC	mueschel	Yes, this is a possible way. a) if you use iD, check all tags again after snapping the node to the intersection - some of them are already tagged and this might cause iD to add wrong tags. b) Are these traffic lights for pedestrians only or do they control the intersection as well? http://www....

50969461 by lorandr_telenav	1	2017-08-15 20:37:54 UTC	mueschel	Fixed several 'maxpeed' tags - could you check if I got them all?

50632028 by flierfy	1	2017-08-15 20:37:01 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the tag "maxpeed:tilting" on a bunch of tracks. Could you edit them and add the missing 's'? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-08-15 21:58:10 UTC	flierfy	Hello Jan, I thank you for the hint. I've added the missing letter. With thankful regards, Stephan

50947147 by ElliottPlack	1	2017-08-14 11:35:09 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you explain the meaning of 'eruv' on this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513968801 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-08-14 14:56:41 UTC	ElliottPlack	Jan, Sure, an eruv is a physical object that serves as a symbolic boundary in the Jewish Orthodox faith. Read more:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv There isn't a great tag for this yet on OSM, so I added this under the premise of the "Any tags you like" principle (http://wiki.opens...
	3	2017-08-14 15:13:16 UTC	mueschel	Alright, I haven't seen this before. I see one potential problem with the tagging: A barrier=* implies an access restriction, by default access=no. So, if anybody by mistake adds a common node with any highway, routing engines might think traffic is blocked. I don't think we have a proper tagging...
	4	2017-08-15 02:48:02 UTC	ElliottPlack	Jan: I'm glad that you found this and commented. I think your idea is superb. I was trying to decide if I should use an existing key like barrier but you make a good point that it could be interpreted by a routing engine as a generic barrier. Better to start something totally fresh. What do you t...
	5	2017-08-15 18:42:39 UTC	mueschel	':' versus '_' - there is no functional difference between the two. Usually, ':' is used for subkeys, e.g. a key that further describes the main key, e.g. 'capacity' and the more specific 'capacity:disabled'. The underscore is more used like a replacement for a space as in "internet_access"...

50952851 by dayanmail3	1	2017-08-14 09:22:05 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the tag "Wifi_Etecsa = Wifi_Etecsa" on several nodes - this is not a common tag, could you explain its meaning? If it is the operator of the Wifi, consider the key internet_access:operator Cheers, Jan

50905370 by Natalia Hotel	1	2017-08-14 09:19:14 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you please check the Russian tags on this object? All objects have to use the tags described in the wiki, otherwise this information can not be understood by any software. деятельность = отдых деятельность_1 = пансионат озеро = исс�...

51080997 by freeExec	1	2017-08-14 08:54:45 UTC	mueschel	Hi, what do you mean using the prefix "will:" on these buildings? The usual prefixes include planned:, proposed: and "construction", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-08-14 09:43:42 UTC	freeExec	Thanks for the help, I will change for the planned.

51067014 by steffenetz	1	2017-08-13 18:07:29 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, du hast hier Öffnungszeiten eingetragen - könntest du sie noch ändern, so dass sie nach dem gängigen Schema getagged sind? So lassen sie sich dann auch automatisch auswerten und in diversen Tools anzeigen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening hours Wenn ...

50796752 by geozeisig	1	2017-08-10 19:10:20 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, du hast hier mehrfach 'raised:building' geschrieben - meinst du 'razed'? Jan
	2	2017-08-11 15:57:24 UTC	geozeisig	Du hast recht ich finde es aber spontan nicht wieder.
	3	2017-08-11 16:25:38 UTC	mueschel	Kein Problem: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qWB

50840248 by YuriEugenio	1	2017-08-11 10:59:42 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM. All objects in OSM need to have a tag that describes what they are. Just putting a human readable description on a node won't do the job. The wiki shows how these tags should look like, e.g. here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dbasin Jan

50760874 by Undearius	1	2017-08-09 07:00:42 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the key 'namleg_en' on several boundaries. This key is new and not used in other places. Maybe the usual tags 'official_name', 'official_name:en' or 'full_name' fit? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-08-09 14:33:11 UTC	Undearius	My apologies. I had originally intended to remove these tags but they made it easier for filtering. The value of these tags is their full, proper legal name so they may be useful. The 'namleg_en' tag is the same as the 'name' tag with the addition of "Township of" or "County of"...
	3	2017-08-10 17:15:54 UTC	mueschel	'official_name:en' is used almost 2000 times, and follows the guidelines shown on the Wiki page on name tags. Thanks for taking care!
	4	2017-08-14 19:53:47 UTC	Undearius	I've changed the tags to the correct ones. Thank you for the help.

50131125 by ddm-dolomitico	1	2017-08-06 13:07:59 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the tag "Varsure" on some of these nodes. Could you explain its meaning? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-08-09 09:37:29 UTC	ddm-dolomitico	Hi Jan, the "Varsure" tag is a editing error (in fact "Varsure" is the name of a location); I corrected the wrong tags with "name: lld" or "loc_name". Thank you very much for your error reporting. In the future, I will pay more attention to OSM's editing...
	3	2017-08-09 09:51:43 UTC	ddm-dolomitico	Hi Jan, I was wrong, now all "Varsure" tags are correct (I found out the use of "taginfo" so I saw the list of all the wrong tags) Cheers, Danilo
	4	2017-08-09 12:04:58 UTC	mueschel	Hi, thanks for taking the time and fixing this. You can also use http://overpass-turbo.eu/to search for a key (click on 'wizard' and enter "Varsure=* global" then click run)

50751559 by Sibylle1200gs	1	2017-08-09 07:17:23 UTC	mueschel	Hi, bist du sicher, dass die Fahrt hier wirklich 20 Minuten dauert? Oder meinst du, dass die Fähre alle 20 Minuten fährt? Jan

50869013 by mneko	1	2017-08-06 20:11:00 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added many very strange tags here and on other restaurants. Please have a look to the Wiki to see how objects are tagged in OSM. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513151990 DiningRoomHours DriveThruHours EnglishApplicationUrl HasDiningRoom HasDriveThru ImageUrl Latitude Longitude O...
	2	2017-08-06 20:21:05 UTC	mneko	I'm trying to follow the instructions on http://maproulette.org/ui/metrics/433 i might have misunderstood it
	3	2017-08-06 21:50:48 UTC	mueschel	I don't think they meant to copy all the data from there. You can have a look how other restaurants of this chain are mapped: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qQe
	4	2017-08-07 14:09:40 UTC	mneko	OK, I think I corrected the ones I broke
	5	2017-08-08 18:29:35 UTC	mueschel	This looks good. *thumbs up

50920302 by brianboru	1	2017-08-08 10:28:58 UTC	mueschel	Hi, these 32 buildings have the tag "B30 2DH=B30" which looks like a mistake. Could you check that? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-08-08 14:17:43 UTC	brianboru	Thanks Jan - what happened here I don't know! Corrected now

50915951 by lorandr_telenav	1	2017-08-08 10:27:16 UTC	mueschel	These changes contain 33x "maxpeed" instead of "maxspeed". Jan

50702161 by AndrewMcCarthy	1	2017-08-07 11:11:44 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tag on this road (and other segments of it) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59990980 "L3036 = Reddy's Crossroads" looks like a mistake. Cheers, Jan

50896614 by hamryd	1	2017-08-07 11:06:06 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added 53 objects with the tag "stig=stig" which looks like a mistake, could you check that? http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qQM Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-08-07 21:12:30 UTC	fatuus	Stig taggas med highway=path

50860824 by Markus Valo	1	2017-08-06 12:32:40 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check 23 of these lines? they have some strange tags like these which seem to be added by mistake: CITYOBJECT_ID=186033 GMLID=BID_ba033755-60eb-4cfa-a17f-787c9a794cad ROOF_TYPE=1000 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-08-06 13:48:28 UTC	Markus Valo	Thanks for noticing! Tried to clean all of them. All of those tags are unnecessary.
	3	2017-08-06 14:28:35 UTC	mueschel	Thanks for your effort. Here are the remaining ones: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qPZ
	4	2017-08-06 14:49:54 UTC	Markus Valo	All clean now, thanks for the tool link!

50010397 by castagnola	1	2017-08-06 13:17:09 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the tag "caricato=false" on 41 ways. This tag is not used in any other place - could you explain its meaning? Cheers, Jan

50204853 by zerpou	1	2017-08-06 12:59:17 UTC	mueschel	Is there any chance that this import gets cleaned up? (Just commenting this one changeset, not all of them) There are hundreds of POIs without proper tags, with a lot of text in undocumented tags like "note50", "opening_hours" which don't use the documented syntax and so on. ...

50160595 by zerpou	1	2017-07-10 07:44:27 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of these imported nodes? - 'is_in' can not be used to tag addresses. Use addr:street and addr:housenumber instead - 'Ref:FR:SIREN' should be 'ref:FR:SIREN' - description1 and description2 are no recognized tags - most nodes are missing a physical tag, describing ...
	2	2017-08-06 12:55:26 UTC	mueschel	Is there any chance that this import gets cleaned up? Various people are doing some corrections on this data, but in the end most of the information remains useless. Jan

50067983 by Nemo_bis	1	2017-07-06 08:29:29 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this import of fountains doesn't seem to fit to the OSM license. You put these tags on all nodes: Fonte = Metropolitana Milanese - MM Licenza = CC-BY cc-by is not compatible with ODbL, see https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ And, please don't invent new keys li...
	2	2017-07-06 08:52:17 UTC	Nemo_bis	Sorry for the Italian keys, I was confused by the localisation. Will fix these in a moment. The blog post you link is about the generic CC-BY licenses, but this dataset is under CC-BY-IT which has a special provision waiving all rights for databases, hence Creative Commons Italia believes such da...
	3	2017-07-06 08:59:04 UTC	mueschel	Could you mention this specifically in the changeset comment / source tag? Just so that nobody else gets confused or thinks cc-by is sufficient.
	4	2017-07-11 10:11:44 UTC	Andreas Lattmann	Ciao Nemo_bis, hai fatto la pagina nel Wiki per l' import? Non la riesco a trovare. Grazie
	5	2017-08-05 18:20:31 UTC	mueschel	Are you still going to fix this and provide a documentation of the import?

50553965 by Виталий смит	1	2017-07-26 12:25:48 UTC	mueschel	Hi, something went wrong here - these nodes all have tags like "ref=290 = RU-KDA-6" - the key of this tag is 'ref=290' which can't be right. Could you have a look and fix this? It's about 150 different keys.
	2	2017-08-05 18:07:28 UTC	mueschel	I changed these tags now. Please check if my edit is correct. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50868182

48962080 by Danh Thành Nguyễn	1	2017-08-05 17:46:21 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added many objects with very strange tags here - for example highway=64/24 natural=Chu Thị Thuong Ha shop=TDok What is the meaning of all this? Pleae have a look to the OSM wiki to learn about how objects have to be tagged to be usable by OSM users. Cheers, Jan

50711593 by CUSPC	1	2017-08-01 19:18:12 UTC	mueschel	Hi, there are many nodes which have just strange tags like these: CODLOC=12 GEOCODICE=12/5 GRAFICO=5 LINK=12-5 NCIV=5 Was this a mistake? Jan
	2	2017-08-02 07:55:12 UTC	CUSPC	I have joined a full level rather than just the selection. Now I've corrected all tags. thank you
	3	2017-08-05 17:33:46 UTC	mueschel	They are still there: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qPu

50842548 by mueschel	1	2017-08-04 16:50:24 UTC	GinaroZ	I think mot is correct, as it offers an MOT service?
	2	2017-08-04 17:40:28 UTC	mueschel	Shouldn't it be amenity=vehicle_inspection or service:vehicle:inspection=yes then? The first is documented and used 800 times, the latter is used 30 times.
	3	2017-08-05 13:14:28 UTC	SomeoneElse	Something involving MOT would make perfect sense to me - see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=mot#keys and http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=mot#values for where it's been used before. "inspection" is hardly used for MOTs; see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/sea...
	4	2017-08-05 13:49:16 UTC	mueschel	I'm not from the UK, so I didn't hear the term MOT before. But as far as I see, these tags involving the term MOT are used maybe 50 times in the UK, while all the rest of Europe has the tag amenity=vehicle_inspection used 1300 times. This tag is supported in JOSM and shown e.g. in Osmand as well. ...

50669555 by Alan Bragg	1	2017-08-04 15:23:04 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this way, it has foreign tags only: http://osm.org/way/511262268

50782260 by Stefano baldissera	1	2017-08-03 16:17:57 UTC	mueschel	Hi, most of these nodes have only foreign tags which don't look like they should appear in the OSM database, can you check this? Btw, what is the precise license of this data? Pure cc-by is not compatible with ODbL!
	2	2017-08-03 16:29:25 UTC	Stefano baldissera	Licenza d'uso CC-BY 2.5 fonte dati SITAD REGIONE PIEMONTE . http://www.sistemapiemonte.it/serviziositad/index.shtml https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/it/
	3	2017-08-04 21:44:42 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50850714.

50643334 by EntertheMapZone	1	2017-08-02 19:05:38 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Was genau möchtest du hier mappen? Damit Software etwas mit den Informationen anfangen kann, müssen die Tags genau so wie im Wiki beschrieben benutzt werden. Wirf doch mal einen Blick auf Parkplätze und E-Tankstellen. Bei Fragen hilft man dir im Forum ger...
	2	2017-08-03 15:32:13 UTC	Nakaner	Hallo Jan, der Rest der Beiträge dieses Benutzers scheint auch größtenteils nicht von ernsthafter Natur zu sein. Ich habe es mir im Detail aber nicht angesehen und habe nicht die Zeit, mich darum zu kümmern. Viele Grüße Michael

50622206 by busch19	1	2017-08-01 19:21:48 UTC	mueschel	Kannst du die ganzen 'capacity' tags an diesem und anderen Nodes überprüfen? Für die Leistung gibt es 'power' als Tag. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-08-02 14:23:38 UTC	busch19	Danke für den Hinweis (bin neu). Habe es geändert. Steffen
	3	2017-08-02 18:22:47 UTC	mueschel	Das hatte ich gar nicht gesehen... Dann nachträglich noch: herzlich willkommen bei OSM! Zögere nicht dich zum Beispiel im Forum zu melden wenn du Fragen hast.

50649810 by Ratverlegh	1	2017-08-01 19:45:39 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could uou check the roads you added here? 15 of them have only strange tags: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511074247

50633266 by Te-Ika	1	2017-08-01 19:42:25 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the nodes you added, some have tags like ADDRESS=1810 J 6/10 Rd, Fruita, 81521 PUB_PRI2=Public STREET_TYP=Rd This looks like a mistake.

50622138 by misht	1	2017-08-01 19:34:09 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please be a bit careful when uploading changes - I found two relations where you changed an exisying key to 'ы'
	2	2017-08-02 07:39:46 UTC	misht	Ok, I'm sorry. Accidentally.

50694347 by M!dgard	1	2017-08-01 19:16:24 UTC	mueschel	Hi, 63 ways got the tag 'wip_remove_me' - was this a mistake? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-08-01 21:11:49 UTC	M!dgard	Uh yes, I added that to be able to conveniently select the ways I had to change, and I forgot to remove them. Fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/50764793. Thanks for the heads-up!

50582202 by Jay May	1	2017-07-31 15:45:14 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you explain all the name tags of this node? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4858193412 I doubt it has this name with '3.5 t'
	2	2017-08-01 07:13:29 UTC	Jay May	Hi :) Sure! This is for people using OSM-based GPS apps (ex.: maps.me) to know which lane is for regular cars (≤3.5t meaning “for vehicles with a weight up to 3,5 tons), and which one is for trucks (TIR, abbreviation of Transport International Routier, is understood by every truck driver u...
	3	2017-08-01 14:30:29 UTC	mueschel	We do have a clear policy that the name tag contains just the actual name and does not contain any description. For this you can use tags like maxweight or hgv. If tools like maps.me do not support this, request them to adapt to common OSM tagging rules.
	4	2017-08-01 17:40:00 UTC	Jay May	One question: what will it change for OSM if those border control tagged names are not visible to regular OSM users anyway?
	5	2017-08-01 18:15:40 UTC	mueschel	Who is a "regular osm user"? There are hundreds of different maps and tools around. All of them render different things. And for example searching for names gets increasingly difficult if we add arbitrary information to the name tag.
	6	2017-08-01 18:52:38 UTC	Jay May	I'm afraid this is not arbitrary info. It is useful info, otherwise I wouldn't waste my time to look for it and reflect it on OSM. Rules are there as an indication, and may sometimes be wrong Some of them must be changed. You state the policy on names it clear. I'm afraid it isn't. There are a cou...

50641866 by Kyaw Htet Aung	1	2017-07-30 16:05:16 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found 12 objects in your uploads with many foreign keys and no common OSM tags. Could you have a look and fix these? Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510975694 Cheers, Jan

50641878 by Mohamed NAJAR	1	2017-07-30 16:03:55 UTC	mueschel	Hi, most of the information you added does not use common tags. Spelling and Upper/Lower case matters a lot for software to be able to interpret these tags, e.g. name instead of NAME name:ar instead of Name_ar place instead of Place and so on. Could you please fix this? Cheers, Jan

50569423 by DeBigC	1	2017-07-30 15:45:15 UTC	mueschel	Please be careful what you upload to OSM. It's the second time I'm deleting tags like these: Simon = Weak Michael = Strong Peter = Above Average (I removed the user names you had there)

50680289 by Alan Bragg	1	2017-07-30 15:37:35 UTC	mueschel	Hi, some of the nodes have many foreign tags, could you check that? E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5002215004 Ja
	2	2017-08-01 18:46:51 UTC	Alan Bragg	Thanks for catching that error and notifying me. I found that I had another similar error which I have corrected.

50206610 by gurglypipe	1	2017-07-16 13:11:36 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the tag "access:coach =discouraged" in this changeset. This tag has not been used in other places yet. I guess the common tag "tourist_bus = discouraged" is what you want to use here? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-29 11:13:46 UTC	gurglypipe	Not really. The tagging is meant to reflect a road sign which says “Not suitable for coaches”. The tagging documentation I was following is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddiscouraged.
	3	2017-07-29 12:40:46 UTC	mueschel	'access:' is never a part of those keys. And osm knows two types of busses: bus and tourist_bus. Both are described on the wiki page you linked to. The 'discouraged' part is perfectly fine.
	4	2017-07-29 13:04:36 UTC	gurglypipe	I was following the example of `access:bicycle=yes` (from that page). I guess the intention of the road sign could be encoded as `bus=discouraged`, `tourist_bus=discouraged`? The sign is probably more targeting the length and wheel base of the vehicles rather than their use as PSVs or multi-person v...
	5	2017-07-29 14:07:38 UTC	mueschel	I don't know why this is listed there. The correct tag is 'bicycle' and is used 10000 times more often (300 vs 3 million uses)
	6	2017-07-29 16:23:55 UTC	gurglypipe	OK, changed to bus=discouraged tourist_bus=discouraged in changeset #50675680. I’m not sure if I got all the instances of it, since I can’t get overpass to list any access:coach instances. (I’m obviously using it wrongly.)
	7	2017-07-29 16:41:19 UTC	mueschel	Goto overpass-turbo.eu, Open the wizard and type 'access:coach=* global', click run. There is nothing left.
	8	2017-07-30 08:07:26 UTC	gurglypipe	Great, thanks

50497655 by wajak	1	2017-07-27 10:37:56 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tracktype tag of this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509577193 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-27 11:25:12 UTC	wajak	corrected. Thanks

50499042 by zulfadli51	1	2017-07-27 10:32:38 UTC	mueschel	Hi, it's preferred to use the key 'alt_name' instead of 'name_1' - alt_name can be searched for (e.g. in the search box on osm.org) while most tools do not support name_1. Cheers, Jan

50578881 by Kyaw Htet Aung	1	2017-07-27 06:16:29 UTC	calfarome	Hello Kyaw Htet Aung, Thank you for your map edits, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. What is the source of this data that you are adding?, it seems that each of the points you added has its duplicates to the side and that is inconsistent for OpenStreetMap. Could you please explain what happening i...
	2	2017-07-27 08:32:03 UTC	mueschel	Hi, it also looks like there are many tags copied from the source without changing them to common OSM standards. E.g. these tags should not appear in OSM Shape_Area=0.00606869668746 Shape_Leng=0.57835062104 lat=16.850959 lng=96.162165 And, for example name tags in different languages have ...
	3	2017-07-29 21:30:33 UTC	rene78	Time to revert?

50535860 by ArjanO	1	2017-07-26 15:59:10 UTC	mueschel	Hi, something went wrong here. There are 160 nodes on the same spot, all with a lot of foreign tags which don't look like they belong to OSM: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4990832927 Jan
	2	2017-07-26 16:02:00 UTC	mueschel	PS: I doubt that these lights are 4.5 km high. 'height' uses meter as units, not millimeters.
	3	2017-07-28 13:58:06 UTC	didier2020	i fix height in this changeset 50650261
	4	2017-08-08 14:20:20 UTC	ArjanO	I guess something went wrong with an import. Point taken. best regards, Arjano

50451789 by Fuss-im-Ohr	1	2017-07-26 12:38:38 UTC	mueschel	Hi, das tag 'vtm = yes' - soll das 'atm' heißen? Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-07-26 13:28:20 UTC	Fuss-im-Ohr	jetzt hab ich schon einen Note angefügt.....
	3	2017-07-26 13:29:49 UTC	Fuss-im-Ohr	dafür stimmt aber die FaxNr nicht ganz, das merkt natürlich keiner :-)
	4	2017-07-26 13:35:26 UTC	mueschel	Das übersieht man durchaus, vor allem wenn da nur ein Link steht und keine Erklärung. Da es sich um eine Bezahlmethode handelt, sollte der Tag wohl 'payment:vtm = yes' heißen, besser noch payment:vtm-fair, damit es eindeutiger zugeordnet ist.
	5	2017-07-26 13:42:54 UTC	Fuss-im-Ohr	das macht sogar Sinn, da es noch ein "neuer" Tag ist müsste man es im Wiki auch mal zur Diskussion stellen. Im IRC gab es noch keine Meinung dazu
	6	2017-07-26 13:53:44 UTC	mueschel	Du kannst es einfach hier eintragen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:payment#Tankkarten Das Tagging-Schema ist ja etabliert, da braucht es meiner Meinung nach keine Diskussion.

50477255 by Jojo4u	1	2017-07-25 11:27:01 UTC	mueschel	Was meinst du denn mit "scheduled"? Üblicherweise nehmen wir doch preproposed / proposed / planned / construction. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-07-27 21:51:51 UTC	Jojo4u	Ich dachte ich mache nochmal Werbung für mein scheduled-Proposal. Aber jetzt am Desktop sehe ich bei Taginfo nur 2 Objekte. Aber planned wird ja auch noch nicht gerendert... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Scheduled_lifecycle

50349827 by MichaelCollinson	1	2017-07-23 09:06:16 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this changeset contains 24 times the tag "farrmland", note the spelling mistake. Could you have a look and fix it? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-23 10:47:03 UTC	MichaelCollinson	Jan, Thanks for pointing that out. Yes, I will fix it.

50417371 by VLD009	1	2017-07-23 09:04:57 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added some ways with these tags: edited=true import=yes I guess these are not needed and can be removed? Jan
	2	2017-07-25 23:56:37 UTC	VLD009	Hi Jan, Thank you for your message! The import=yes is used to tag our contributions. This is further explained in the wiki [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing] where our process is documented. The edited=true tag is an internal tag and is not needed - we removed the tag. Th...

50475561 by Wei Wu	1	2017-07-23 09:01:38 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tags on some of the buildings? These look rather strange to me: ww=1 ww3=1 And, "signage=Korean" - this is not common in OSM, what do you want to describe with this tag? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-23 11:28:06 UTC	Wei Wu	Hi, Sorry for making you confused, we're now working on a project about Korean-Chinese isolation in Garibong-dong based on the usages and signage of buildings. Signage-Korean means these commercial buildings only have Korean signs, and we also marked other buildings as Korean-Chinese or Korean -En...

50487820 by mappingkat	1	2017-07-23 09:00:09 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you explain how you added these huge landuse areas? According to satellite images, they don't seem to be correct. For example, there is a larger town in one of your landuse=farmland and vice versa. Additionally, you used the unknown keys "Eneo" and "Matumizi". Can ...

50477016 by wmyrda	1	2017-07-23 08:55:16 UTC	mueschel	Hi, on these trees I found several tags which are not common in OSM - maybe you can have a look and find more common ones? Cheers, Jan animate=yes area=not applicable established=1988-12-02 sign=improperly size=not applicable vitality=3
	2	2017-07-23 09:40:57 UTC	wmyrda	All those tags in few minor chageset have their actual meaning which is a preparation of much larger data set from polish national registry of nature preservation. There is discussion in polish subforum about it https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=656206#p656206 I have explained there...

49192211 by mueschel	1	2017-07-22 12:47:47 UTC	SK53	I wonder if the Carshalton Beeches should be promoted to a suburb with places like Carshalton-on-the-Hill as neighbourhoods. When I lived & worked around here 'Barrow Hedges catchment' was the key divide for Carshalton Beeches. The dividing line to N is a bit hard to pick out (everything S of ra...
	2	2017-07-22 13:46:21 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I don't know this area nor the situation - I just changed your "note_for_wikipedians" to the common "note" key so that editors are able to show it to other mappers.

50348138 by virvv	1	2017-07-22 12:06:30 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please have a look to the Wiki on how to map traffic signs: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign Cheers, Jan

50416475 by Andrew Matheny_import	1	2017-07-20 11:04:09 UTC	mueschel	... and another set of 852 wrong address tags.
	2	2017-07-20 14:35:28 UTC	Andrew Matheny	Fixed! Thank you

50324663 by Rayhan Hossen	1	2017-07-18 11:12:56 UTC	mueschel	Hi, Something went wrong here - you added your user name to 49 trees as a tag, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4973522973 Could you have a look? Jan
	2	2017-07-18 12:47:05 UTC	Rayhan Hossen	Hi Jan, Thanks for your message. I've just checked that changesets and yes, you're right. I don't have any clear idea but somehow I added my username as a tag on those trees. I'm gonna delete those tags. Thanks a lot! Regards, Rayhan Hossen

50282241 by Anonix35	1	2017-07-18 10:45:09 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the maxspeed on this way? Looks like a spelling mistake. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507556776 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-18 11:02:35 UTC	Anonix35	It's corrected. Small error

50223064 by PathFinder42	1	2017-07-17 12:07:00 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, was stellt dieser Knoten da? perch = yes und name = Perch sind leider keine Beschreibung, die in OSM gebräuchlich sind. Schau doch mal ins Wiki, wie überlicherweise getagged wird - oder beschreibe das Objekt hier genauer, dann kann ich weiterhelfen. Gruß, Jan

50299733 by roomer	1	2017-07-16 11:32:25 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added a strange tag on 97 objects: "tourism=apartment=16" Did you mean rooms = 16 or number_of_apartments = 16? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-17 06:35:26 UTC	Ambush	Hi Jan, it was a mistake, roomer wanted to set addr:housenumber = 16, but something went wrong =) I've fixed it. WBR, Pavel

50212623 by getBounds	1	2017-07-15 10:30:45 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of these shapes? They don't have any valid tags. For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506808224 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-15 10:41:46 UTC	getBounds	Thanks not sure what happened here. I think these are supposed to be holes in the park polygon. I'll have to check. I assume I can cut holes in polygons in iD?

50197727 by Manuambientólogo	1	2017-07-15 10:28:04 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM! you added these tags to a node: Acera ampliada = si Alta visibilidad = si Isleta o zona protegida = no Rampa en linea con el cruce = si http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4962761018 This might be a good description of the object, but is not understood by any OSM-b...

50176731 by EPTBSN-AR	1	2017-07-14 10:42:43 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this stream as 18 foreign keys which don't look like they should appear in the OSM database. Could you have a look? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506460710 Cheers, Jan

50219023 by ChristianA	1	2017-07-13 20:01:33 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added some ways with strange tags like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506883545 Could you have a look? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-13 21:01:10 UTC	ChristianA	Haha, the road data came from an open dataset from the Swedish road administration. I forgot to change the attributes from some of the roads. I will fix it.
	3	2017-07-13 21:16:08 UTC	ChristianA	How can I find all roads that have the bad data?
	4	2017-07-14 08:21:55 UTC	mueschel	You can use overpass-turbo and its Wizard: http://overpass-turbo.eu?w=STARTAVST=*+global Looks like there is only one way left: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506288954

50128033 by Gianfranco2014	1	2017-07-12 11:28:12 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of the name of this street (and its second part)? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233256198 Cheers, Jan

50190194 by AjBelnuovo	1	2017-07-12 11:11:13 UTC	mueschel	Hi, when mapping service times, you don't need to use several tags for all the days. They can be combined into one: service_times=So 07:30; 10:00; 19:00 service_times_1=Sat 19:00 service_times_2=Fr 19:30 service_times_3=Wed 15:00 service_times = Su 07:30, 10:00, 19:00; Sa 19:00; Fr 19:30; We...
	2	2017-07-12 21:46:54 UTC	AjBelnuovo	Jan , ok , obrigado pelas informações . Vou editar como de acordo com as informações que me enviou. Abraços , Airton

50060820 by Senbee	1	2017-07-10 08:05:45 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this way? The tag 70 = 90 looks strange. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505304853 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-10 08:19:25 UTC	Senbee	Just corrected. Thank you. Cheers, Stefano

50030689 by amisha2016	1	2017-07-10 07:01:51 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added many points with tags like these: BLOCK_No \t017 HOUSE_No \tPNB BANK WARD_No \t51 ZONE_No \tZONE-D Unfortunately, this information can not be used by any OSM tool or map. Please have a look to the wiki how addresses have to mapped so that they can be found and shown: https://wik...
	2	2017-07-10 23:23:44 UTC	SomeoneElse_Revert	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.

50130186 by amisha2016	1	2017-07-10 06:58:41 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please check some other mapped areas to find out how streets are commonly mapped in OSM. Drawing the outline of the road might look nice in some map, but is otherwise rather useless. If you have questions, feel free to contact the OSM community!
	2	2017-07-10 23:23:45 UTC	SomeoneElse_Revert	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.

50128985 by amisha2016	1	2017-07-10 06:29:27 UTC	mueschel	Hi, are there really 90 hotels with the same name in this city?
	2	2017-07-10 23:23:41 UTC	SomeoneElse_Revert	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.

50033644 by Allroads	1	2017-07-09 14:18:05 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you explain the meaning of "disabled_vehicle=no"? http://osm.org/way/505049343 and 2 more Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-09 16:16:59 UTC	Allroads	Hello, You find it ;-), this recently added tag. Because of a traffic sign. Netherlands traffic_signs https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden#C:_Geslotenverklaring says at C9 or C13 or C14 or C15. "gehandicaptenvoertuigen" a "voertuíg...
	3	2017-07-09 17:19:48 UTC	mueschel	Alright. Looked like a mistake to me, not knowing the details.

50063763 by Jake Strine	1	2017-07-09 14:29:00 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please check the tagging of some of the nodes - they all have tags which don't look like they belong to OSM. For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505332377 Jan

50026944 by Loneship	1	2017-07-09 14:26:02 UTC	mueschel	Hier stimmt etwas nicht mit der direction: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4950394110
	2	2017-07-10 07:37:42 UTC	Loneship	Danke für den Hinweis, habe es korrigiert.

50034407 by emj	1	2017-07-09 14:24:31 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this node? I guess something went wrong with the name tag. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4950931435 Cheers, Jan

50036126 by dada_0612	1	2017-07-09 14:22:37 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of these rooms? They have many tags which don't look like they should appear in OSM, for example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505040179 chinese_t = 312演藝廳 english = auditorium label = 演藝廳 navi = true show_label = true show_region...

50106788 by virvv	1	2017-07-09 13:56:49 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM! Please keep in mind that the correct spelling of tags is very important in OSM - otherwise software can not understand the meaning. E.g. this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505828897 There must be no capital letters ("Yes", "Wheelchair", "Wid...
	2	2017-07-10 12:24:23 UTC	virvv	Hello Jan, Thank you very much for your comments. Regards Vir

50063143 by martindick56	1	2017-07-06 08:36:37 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, du gibst bei deinen Ergänzungen von Hofläden verschiedene Webseiten als Quelle an. Ich habe mehrere davon überprüft und auf keiner einen Hinweis gefunden, dass die Daten frei verwendet werden dürfen. In OSM dürfen nur Daten eingetragen werden, deren Lizenz kompa...
	2	2017-07-07 09:53:03 UTC	martindick56	Hallo "mueschel", Vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Würde das nun heissen, dass alle Webseiten-Verweise gelöscht werden müssten? Und wie steht es mit den anderen Informationen zu den erwähnten Hofläden, welche z.B. von Telsearch stammen? Natürlich kö...
	3	2017-07-07 11:15:12 UTC	mueschel	Ich weiß es nicht, aber ich fürchte, dass telesearch da durchaus eine Klausel in den Nutzungsbedingungen hat, die nur die persönliche Nutzung erlaubt, aber nicht die kommerzielle Weitergabe. (OSM selbst ist zwar nicht kommerziell, aber die Daten dürfen dann auch für kommerz...
	4	2017-07-07 12:34:02 UTC	martindick56	Schön, das ganze scheint sich noch weiter zu komplizieren... Schau mal auf der webseite www.anhbl.ch nach. Dort habe ich alle Organisationen und Körperschaften (Gemeinden, Bürgergemeinden, Naturschutzorganisationen, Stiftungen, alles was im engeren und weiteren Sinn mit Natur- und He...
	5	2017-07-08 08:00:49 UTC	SimonPoole	Einzelne Informationen von den Webseiten der Objekte (den Hofläden) zu übernehmen ist wohl weitestgehend problemlos, was aber nicht geht, ist ohne Erlaubnis Verzeichnisse und Sammlungen solcher Informationen zu nutzen ohne Erlaubnis (die Ersteller solcher Verzeichnisse haben ja meistens au...
	6	2017-07-11 13:02:29 UTC	martindick56	Lieber Simon, Ich werde bei den Verzeichnis-Anbietern (es sind etwa 10 verschiedene) nachfragen und bei fehlender Erlaubnis ihren Eintrag unter Source löschen. Freundliche Grüsse Martin
	7	2017-07-11 19:45:53 UTC	martindick56	Hallo zusammen, Inzwischen habe ich bei https://www.falstaff.at nachgefragt und per Mail die Erlaubnis gekriegt, diese Daten für Kartierungen zu nutzen. Wo soll diese Information abgelegt werden. Weiss jemad darüber Bescheid?

50043770 by Hammershoej	1	2017-07-05 11:28:43 UTC	mueschel	Hi, the key "bike_friend" has not been used anywhere in OSM so far. I guess you mean "motorcycle_friendly" - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Amotorcycle_friendly And: Please don't forget to add comments to changesets! Jan
	2	2017-07-05 12:43:43 UTC	Hammershoej	Hi, bike_friend is a new tag. It is used to show that the location in question is registered as bike friendly. It is a programme offered by the local tourist organisation for Southern Funen: http://www.visitsvendborg.dk/denmark/vil-du-vaere-bike-friend It is on my to-do list to write documentat...
	3	2017-07-05 12:46:23 UTC	Hammershoej	As to writing changeset comments, I admit to skipping. This is a limit to both Potlatch and iD. It simply takes too much time when there is a seperate changeset for each of 90 changes. Problem is that for each point I have to return to the main page, search for the location and then edit. I can't do...
	4	2017-07-05 12:49:23 UTC	mueschel	The term "bike" is not used in OSM because it is ambiguous - it could be motorcycle of bicycle. i suggest to follow the existing tagging scheme of "motorcycle_friendly" and use "bicycle_friendly". Apart from that, if you add data from an external source, you have to ...
	5	2017-07-05 13:52:07 UTC	Hammershoej	License: I know this of cause and have cleared it before starting. As to naming, I see your point, but I also find it counter-intuitive to tag a programme called 'Bike Friend' as 'cycle_friend'. Please hold your horses and questions until I have written the documentation.

49961887 by maurizioa	1	2017-07-05 11:35:36 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this object? You changed the park to a huge highway. I guess this was a mistake... http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6148865/history Cheers, Jan

49931700 by bsmith54	1	2017-07-03 10:50:35 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I understand that it is important to collect information about emergency plans. But I don't think it helps to add hundreds of nodes without any meaningful tag. This data is just in the database, but no tool will be able to find these nodes or display them in any meaningful way.
	2	2017-07-03 11:28:58 UTC	bsmith54	Hi, Thank you so much for catching this! I'm working on a project in collaboration with the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, and completely missed this (incredibly important!) observation. I'll make sure to go back and update those nodes appropriately. Any additional insights you have would ...

49889037 by LogicalViolinist	1	2017-07-03 09:02:04 UTC	mueschel	Hi, did you really want to add this huge amount of foreign tags to ways like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105028180 Jan
	2	2017-07-03 11:32:41 UTC	LogicalViolinist	No I didnt sorry about that. I'll get it corrected when I have access to a computer. Thanks for spotting it.
	3	2017-07-04 14:44:31 UTC	LogicalViolinist	I've corrected the issues. Thank you for pointing it out.

49860140 by Sembola	1	2017-07-02 14:08:01 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added a strange tag to the three lifts here: abandoned:aerialway=drag_lift = forest Could you check that? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-02 21:37:59 UTC	Sembola	Corrected, I really don't know what happened... Thanks for checking

49859166 by caraw_padaka	1	2017-07-02 13:59:42 UTC	mueschel	Hi, sure you can add the name in any language. You have to find the 3-letter code of the language (wikipedia is very helpful) and add it to the name key. If it's not a language, but just a different name, you can use e.g. old_name or loc_name keys. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-09 18:22:15 UTC	Supaplex	恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。編輯須知台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ta...

49977834 by psch-48	1	2017-07-02 13:54:30 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please watch out for the spelling of tags. I just fixed several: addr:sity -> addr:city, nameaddr:housenumber -> addr:housenumber I don't know if I catched all, please check. Jan

49833644 by docschenk	1	2017-07-01 10:36:53 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, was hat es mit dem Key "ref (OHA)" auf sich, das du hier benutzt? Hat sich die Straßennummer geändert, dann ist der Platz für die alte Nummer der Key "old_ref". Und gib bitte in deinen Changesets auch die Quelle der Änderungen und einen Kommentar an.\...
	2	2017-07-01 15:00:34 UTC	docschenk	Hallo Jan, grundsätzlich ist mir bekannt, dass old_ref der richtige Key wäre. Nur was macht man, wenn der reif öfter wechselt? Der Landkreis Osterode hat mit Göttingen fusioniert, alle Kreisstraßen des Altkreises OHA bekommen jetzt eine 400er Nummer (7 -> 407 usw.). Da d...
	3	2017-07-01 17:12:05 UTC	mueschel	Ich würde diese Information weglassen. old_ref akzeptiert auch mehrere Werte, getrennt durch ";". Wenn du den OHA noch erwähnen willst, geht etwas wie old_ref:OHA, das benutzt die übliche Syntax eines namespaces. Das würde ich aber nur zusätzlich zum gängigen...

49821827 by LafarM	1	2017-07-01 09:38:05 UTC	mueschel	Hi, in this edit you used some keys like these to map destinations: colour:back:backward colour:text:backward direction:backward Typically, other keys are used, like 'destination' and 'destination:colour'. Could you have a look and adapt to this scheme? Here is a Wiki page with some examples:...

49941135 by MaxDragonheart	1	2017-07-01 09:25:04 UTC	mueschel	Could you check this import as well? These tags don't look they belong to OSM: J_DESC=2.1.1.1 - prevalentemente seminativi senza vegetazione sparsa area_mq=291039.54 clc_lvl1=2 clc_lvl2=21 clc_lvl3=211 clc_lvl4=2111 id=1199 isolati_ID=143 tipo_area=Non ...

49940213 by MaxDragonheart	1	2017-07-01 09:22:28 UTC	mueschel	Hi, it looks like something went wrong with this import of buildings: They all have tags which should not appear in the OSM database. Could you check this? E.g. altezza=2.81 id=2521 isolati_ID=136 layer=0207I-Tettoia O Pensilina Invariato superficie=168.65 tipoedific=...

49795298 by gekapes	1	2017-06-30 12:58:02 UTC	mueschel	Hi, was heißt denn "maxbreight"? Vielleicht maxwidth? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4934180080 Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-07-01 07:47:19 UTC	gekapes	Hi Jan, danke, dass Du es gesehen hast. Ich habe schon ausgebessert. Ich weiss selber nicht, wieso ich es so getaggt habe. Gruss, Jeka

49764364 by amisha2016	1	2017-06-29 21:07:22 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added several objects with many strange tags. None of them is a tag we typically use. For example this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502831987 Could you have a look and revise the tagging to use common tags? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-10 23:23:46 UTC	SomeoneElse_Revert	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.

49876994 by santi-cherry	1	2017-06-29 07:48:18 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM! you added several points with information about the number of inhabitants. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. Also, our database in case sensitive, all keys have to be in lower case...

49742528 by paulgilbert	1	2017-06-28 11:44:34 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this node, it has many strange tags: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4930534149 Cheers, Jan

49875811 by Undearius	1	2017-06-28 07:38:16 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the key "dbh" on these nodes. It is not used anywhere else up to now - what is meaning of this key?
	2	2017-07-07 17:42:52 UTC	Undearius	I suppose late is better than never. DBH is Diameter at Breast Height. It was part of an ongoing discussion on the import mailing list and has since been converted to circumference. These nodes will be deleted and replaced with the proper ones.

49863525 by ioanam_telenav	1	2017-06-28 07:37:03 UTC	mueschel	Hi, all of these ways have many tags which don't seem to belong to the OSM database, e.g.: date=no full_id=w667896 ispaved=True osm_id=667896 osm_type=way telenav_cy=CHANGED
	2	2017-06-28 12:22:34 UTC	ioanam_telenav	Hello! Sorry, it was my mistake. I have changed and uploaded the tags according to the OSM database.
	3	2017-06-28 13:19:54 UTC	ioanam_telenav	I have worked on a specific data set and I have accidentally uploaded it. But I have deleted everything that has mistakenly been uploaded. Now it should be fine.

49717550 by nhuqn1	1	2017-06-27 13:17:57 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM. You added a lot of points here, but none of them has any meaningful tags. Please take your time to read in the OSM Wiki how tagging has to be done to be useful in any application that uses OSM data.

49638054 by simlox	1	2017-06-27 11:32:19 UTC	mueschel	Hi, kannst du hier mal nach dem Tag "lanes2" schauen? Scheint mir eher eine destination in irgendeine Richtung zu sein. Und 'maxspeed:source' sollte eher 'source:maxspeed' heißen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353516976 Gruß, Jan

49661960 by HairyCoo	1	2017-06-26 10:34:50 UTC	mueschel	Hi, ich habe hier an einigen Knoten Tippfehler korrigiert (sowas wie 'newtork' oder 'public_tranport'). Ich weiß nicht, ob ich alle erwischt habe, vielleicht kannst du auch nochmal drüberschauen. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-06-26 10:43:39 UTC	HairyCoo	Danke für deine Aufmerksamkeit! Ich werde noch mal überprüfen! MfG HairyCoo

48656750 by furban	1	2017-06-25 17:15:13 UTC	mueschel	Woher stammt die Information, dass das hier die K246 ist? Schilder habe ich da bis jetzt noch keine sehen können.
	2	2017-06-25 18:56:46 UTC	furban	das habe ich wohl hier gelesen https://www.karben.de/rathaus-buergerservice/projekte/nordumgehung/
	3	2017-06-25 19:05:44 UTC	TourenbikerFKB	http://www.deges.de/Startseite/L-3351-Ortsumgehung-Karben-eroeffnet-E1440.htm Hier wird sie als L3351. Die frühere L3351 durch den Ortskern wurde zurückgestuft. Am besten mal bei Hessen Mobil erkundigen.
	4	2017-06-25 19:06:28 UTC	TourenbikerFKB	...soll heißen: mit L3351 bezeichnet.
	5	2017-06-25 20:27:01 UTC	mueschel	Genau, sie soll die L3351 werden. Habe aber keine Beschilderung gesehen, dass das schon passiert ist.
	6	2017-06-26 06:03:28 UTC	furban	Dann bau es doch um. Kann man ja immer noch wieder anders machen. Aber es klingt ja nur logisch das diese Straße eher mal ein Lxxx als ein Kxxx sein sollte.

49619981 by SebastianPlesko	1	2017-06-25 18:11:31 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the key "lcr_ref" to several roads - did you mean "lcn_ref"? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-25 18:16:55 UTC	SebastianPlesko	yes. i'm going to soon remove it anyway and make "relations" instead. i finally got a map from the local municipality (was really hard to find) where exactly the bicycle paths go.

49744264 by Ken MacKenzie	1	2017-06-24 20:25:20 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the key "ScientificName" on some nodes - in OSM we have the tag "species" (as well as "genus") for that. If you want to tag the English name of the species, you can use "species:en". Jan
	2	2017-06-29 22:21:06 UTC	SK53	Also the key taxon (effectively synonymous with species a lot of the time, but most useful when cultivars come into play as with many stree trees)

49574200 by tbm	1	2017-06-24 20:15:14 UTC	mueschel	Hi, Kannst du hier nochmal nach dem payment-Tag schauen? Mit eckigen Klammern kann man da wohl nicht bezahlen :-) http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4917650794
	2	2017-06-24 20:18:52 UTC	tbm	Fixed, thanks!

49667974 by Salisu02	1	2017-06-24 20:10:48 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this way just got one strange tag and is missing an "highway" Tag. Could you have a look? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500714135 Cheers, Jan

49782278 by realkaka	1	2017-06-24 18:22:19 UTC	mueschel	Hi, it looks like something went wrong here - too many strange tags: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502976662 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-08-16 19:49:21 UTC	naoliv	realkaka, esses dados que você utilizou aqui são de onde, por favor?
	3	2017-08-16 20:08:48 UTC	realkaka	naoliv, dos setores censitários do IBGE.
	4	2017-08-16 20:12:25 UTC	naoliv	Beleza. Valeu!

49659418 by TetiSoft	1	2017-06-23 18:44:45 UTC	mueschel	Die Linie 74 hält in Vilbel weder am Bussteig A noch B, sondern ausschließlich an E. Sie war allerdings absichtlich nicht eingetragen, weil es sich dabei nur um 2 Schülerfahrten pro Schultag handelt, und wir solche Schulbusse oft gar nicht erfassen.
	2	2017-06-24 19:27:36 UTC	TetiSoft	Danke für die Info, habe Linie 74 (die vorher übrigens schon eingetragen war aber IIRC ab Heinrich-Heine-Straße statt Bahnhof fuhr) korrigiert. Habe auch ref und local_ref für die Haltepositionen am Bahnhof gesetzt.

49542255 by q_un_go	1	2017-06-23 13:03:03 UTC	mueschel	Hi, das Tag hier sieht merkwürdig aus... http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2313608108 Gruß, Jan

49527055 by Hilton Hotels	1	2017-06-23 12:50:02 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please check the tagging. Email, Phone and Website are no valid keys in OSM. Also, please don't misuse the description tag for extended advertising texts.
	2	2017-06-28 09:40:20 UTC	Hilton Hotels	Thank you for turning our attention to the wrongly entered tags. All of this has been fixed. Thank you once again.

49523545 by alinan_telenav	1	2017-06-23 12:42:22 UTC	mueschel	Could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39437968 'maxspeed:f' is not a valid tag.
	2	2017-06-26 06:13:16 UTC	alinan_telenav	Hello, Thank you for pointing this out for me. I changed the tag. Have a nice day, Alina

49527643 by babssame	1	2017-06-23 12:41:34 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM! could you explain the meaning of the tags you added here? I don't fully see what you want to express and in the current state it also can not be interpreted by software. You could have a look to the wiki to see how bus stops are currently mapped.

49735860 by Dorji Wangdi	1	2017-06-23 12:14:05 UTC	mueschel	Hi, the 198 objects you added here contain some rather strange tags: CODE=WALL COLOUR_NU=16 GROUP=BuildingL LENGTH=22.406 NUMBER=1025 TYPE=Line Where these added by mistake or is there some useful information contained? Cheers, Jan

49477138 by osm_Ralef	1	2017-06-22 08:54:02 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, du gibst hier als Quelle ein Buch an - hast du eine schriftliche Genehmigung, diese Daten in OSM zu übernehmen? Die Lizenz unter der Quellen stehen, muss mit der ODbL von OSM kompatibel sein. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-06-22 14:37:54 UTC	osm_Ralef	Hallo Jan, ich war etwas blauäugig, diese Infos so einzustellen. Bin nicht davon ausgegangen, das die hier schon urherberrechtlich interessant ist, da nur kurze Auszüge mit Quellenangabe. Eine Genehmigung wird auch schwierig, da der Verfasser leider 2001 verstorben ist. Ich werde alle ...

49481341 by Lowe253	1	2017-06-21 20:42:51 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the tag "litname = no". Did you mean "lit=no"? www.openstreetmap.org/way/483249177 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-22 14:27:31 UTC	Lowe253	Hi, mueschel you guessed right. Already fixed. Thanks

49484920 by AngVermill	1	2017-06-21 20:23:39 UTC	mueschel	Hi, between 6th and 7th street you created 3 overlapping roads. Could you check and fix that? Cheers, Jan

49443937 by Jabolek	1	2017-06-21 19:39:57 UTC	mueschel	Hi, what is the meaning of this tag? ata_delete:construction \t2017-06-30 on node http://osm.org/node/2499396427 If there is some temporary construction, it's best to use the "temporary" prefix or "conditional" suffix, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_fea...

49697929 by Protoxenus	1	2017-06-21 12:36:20 UTC	mueschel	Hi, dieser Tag hier stimmt leider auch nicht so ganz: "access:agricultural:forward:conditional =\tnone @ maxweight" Keine Gewichtsbeschränkung für landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge wäre maxweight:forward:conditional = none @ agricultural Grüße, Jan
	2	2017-06-21 18:30:23 UTC	Protoxenus	habs geändert......

49615072 by M!dgard	1	2017-06-20 21:22:52 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the tags "moped_p" and "moped_a" in this changeset. These are not used very often - moped_P and moped_A are used more often. Could you adapt to this more common spelling of the keys? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-21 11:53:04 UTC	M!dgard	Hi Jan Tags with capital letters don't fit in with the other tags. For example for emergency=aed it was voted explicitly to use lowercase. I'm aware that moped_A is more popular at the moment, but unless it is standardized to use uppercase (there're only two mentions about it in the wiki, no d...
	3	2017-06-21 12:27:28 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you're right, upper case keys are rare. But looking at the statistics, we have e.g. 550 moped_A, but only 30 moped_a. In my opinion, the best way is to first adopt the more common scheme and in parallel start a discussion in the local community. Then we can do an automated retagging once there ...
	4	2017-06-21 12:39:33 UTC	M!dgard	(Erratum: it was voted as emergency=defibrillator, not aed, but the vote for the lowercase option got significantly more votes than the uppercase one.)
	5	2017-06-21 12:59:28 UTC	M!dgard	> the best way is to first adopt the more common scheme and in parallel start a discussion in the local community The problem is that the discussion will cite usage numbers, they are one of the metrics that are used to do an informal vote. I don't support that though, those are too easily infl...
	6	2017-06-21 13:08:28 UTC	M!dgard	Matching some more different combinations with the mopeds: Uppercase: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pVA 706 ways Lowercase: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pVB 379 ways So the difference is definitely not an order of magnitude.

49672767 by Protoxenus	1	2017-06-20 21:30:24 UTC	mueschel	Hi, du nutzt hier die Tags maxweight:lanes:left=12t mindistance:hgv:lanes:right=50m Das Suffix :left bzw. :right ist in diesem Zusammenhang nicht definiert - was möchtest du ausdrücken? Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-06-21 07:27:24 UTC	Protoxenus	Die Brücke ist so um die 50 Jahre alt und nicht für das andauernde Befahren mit 40t-LKW konstruiert. Deshalb gibt es eine Einschränkung: linker Fahrstreifen Fahrzeuge mit maximal 12t, rechter Fahrstreifen mit minimalem Abstand von 50m für LKW. Das habe ich versucht, umzusetzen.
	3	2017-06-21 07:32:21 UTC	mueschel	Alles klar, das würde dann so aussehen: maxweight:lanes = 12t \| mindistance:hgv:lanes = \| 50 Bei ":lanes" werden einfach die Eigenschaften aller Spuren aufgezählt, von links nach rechts, getrennt mit "\|", Spuren ohne Eigenschaften bleiben leer.
	4	2017-06-21 07:35:38 UTC	Protoxenus	Ok, daran hatte ich nicht gedacht. Danke für den Hinweis.

49434027 by dornweg	1	2017-06-11 09:18:30 UTC	whb	Was bedeutet denn "2017 = 4 km/h"? z.B. hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118342708 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60175718
	2	2017-06-13 16:07:51 UTC	dornweg	Was "2017 = 4 km/h" bedeutet würde mich auch interessieren. Der Eintrag war schon vorhanden, und ich wollte ihn nicht einfach löschen.
	3	2017-06-20 19:59:36 UTC	mueschel	Da muss ich dich leider enttäuschen, den Tag gibt es erst seit diesem Changeset. Ich lösche ihn dann mal.

49658506 by Ciemek	1	2017-06-20 11:10:33 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found a speling mistake on 43 ways: area:higway instead of area:highway - could you have a look and fix it? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-20 19:50:29 UTC	Ciemek	Hi I corrected spelling mistakes

49657891 by poudel	1	2017-06-20 11:08:19 UTC	mueschel	Please stop adding new objects and sort out your spelling mistakes. Most of the data you added is completely useless because of spelling mistakes. It's likely we have to fully delete it because it would take days to clean everything up by hand.

49431581 by Guylamar2006	1	2017-06-19 10:56:15 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added many objects with foreign tags which don't look like they should appear in OSM data, e.g. ALAND=0 AWATER=433 HYDROID=110783668525 INTPTLAT=+35.5385696 INTPTLON=-93.4273783 MTFCC=H2030 Could you have a look and clean this up? Cheers, Jan

49425894 by theangrytomato	1	2017-06-19 10:48:52 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I saw you added the tag "width:parking:lane:both" on several ways. This tag is not used in any other place up to now. In other places, the tag is "parking:lane:both:width". Could you change this to the common tag? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-21 04:13:55 UTC	theangrytomato	Whoops, sorry about that. Should have it fixed tonight! Bradley

49627494 by poudel	1	2017-06-19 10:20:45 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please check all your tagging of nodes for correctness. Spelling is very important! Most of these tags with spelling mistakes were added by you and can not be used at all in OSM: add: city\t add:city\t add:place\t add:street\t addr : city\t addr : street\t Addr:\t Addr: city\t...

49590724 by matchman	1	2017-06-17 08:13:51 UTC	mueschel	Hi, du hast hier Tags wie 'roadbike-smoothness', 'roadbike:soothness' und 'roadbike:smoothness' hinzugefügt, jeweils etwa 80 Mal. Diese Tags gibt es bisher nicht, und sie entsprechen auch nicht den üblichen Taggingregeln. a) 2 davon haben Schreibfehler, das letzte ist das korrekteste. ...
	2	2017-06-17 08:46:06 UTC	matchman	Hallo Jan, ähnlich dem mtb:scale tag geht es mir darum die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit aus der Sicht eines Rennradfahrers darzustellen und diese zu klassifizieren. Der smoothness key ist hierfür leider nicht präzise genug. Ich würde den key in smoothness:roadbike ändern...
	3	2017-06-19 08:51:30 UTC	mueschel	Ok. Eine Dokumentation in Form eines Proposals sollte es dann schon geben. Am besten natürlich gleich mit Blick auf alle möglichen Verkehrsteilnehmer, nicht nur auf Radfahrer bezogen.

49393441 by Koju Bhakta	1	2017-06-17 18:07:55 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please watch out for the spelling of tags. Only correctly spelled tags can be used by OSM software. E.g. I found 40 objects with the tag 'operater', which should read 'operator'. I didn't check all your edits, but I also found a "amenity=post office" which should be "amenity=po...

49391392 by cibesh009	1	2017-06-17 18:03:44 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found you added several objects with strange tags, like these: open space =yes play ground =godwari-14,makhu boou This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Please have a look to the wiki about common tags for shops or am...

49583979 by psch-48	1	2017-06-16 18:05:23 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcomr to OSM! Please watch out for the spelling of tags, it's "building", "addr:city" and 'colour'. I corrected some of these,but maybe I missed a few. Cheers, Jan

49393671 by aetius	1	2017-06-16 17:57:37 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging? Looks like name and ele tags somehow got mixed. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-16 18:15:56 UTC	daniel-ibex	Hi - the log cabin shelter is out-of-path - node 4904544425, v2 is independently - cordially sorry , I do not speak English

49382416 by Te-Ika	1	2017-06-15 13:39:11 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of this node? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4904979640 Looks like something went wrong with the name tag. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-15 15:25:52 UTC	Te-Ika	Oh yep, got it fixed, thanks!

49384565 by BrettGray	1	2017-06-15 13:37:25 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the key "wayID" to several roads. This key is not used anywhere else - what is the meaning? Is it an official number? This is tagged as 'ref' usually. Cheers, Jan

49363096 by Polina123	1	2017-06-15 13:36:15 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this tagging: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46615603 The tag "M = 4" looks like a mistake. Cheers, Jan

49341491 by Yod4z	1	2017-06-15 13:29:30 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I saw you added some destination tags lately. I would like to point out the usual order of suffixes, e.g. destination:colour:lanes:backward (not destination:lanes:colour:backward) In general, the scheme is: key[:subkey][:hgv\|:bicycle\|...][:lanes][:forward\|:backward\|:both_ways] = * ...

49317719 by schnism	1	2017-06-14 11:46:48 UTC	mueschel	Hi, 'socket:schuko:output' wird bis jetzt nicht verwendet, 'socket:schuko:current' ist (auch für andere Stecker) wesentlich verbreiteter. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-06-14 13:49:13 UTC	schnism	Hi, ich war mir da auch nicht sicher, und habe mich darum am Wiki orientiert: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station Auch taginfo sagt leider garnichts dazu: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=charging_station#combinations Beides mappen ist auch ...
	3	2017-06-14 14:24:38 UTC	mueschel	Ja, die "Kombinationen" sind da nicht umfassend genug für seltene Tags. Ich habe hier geschaut: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/socket:type2#similar Unter der Stecker-Tabelle im Wiki taucht "socket:type2:output" tatsächlich auf, wird aber im Gegensatz zu curr...

49373782 by Tibs67	1	2017-06-14 12:51:42 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the spelling of the key "Source:maxspeed" on 90 ways? It should be lower case, 'source:maxspeed'. Cheers, Jan

49319291 by Robin van der Linde	1	2017-06-14 11:59:14 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the 'capacity:' tag here? Something's missing. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498675775 Cheers, Jan

49310288 by MichaelCollinson	1	2017-06-14 11:55:32 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498610347 I guess those tags shouldn't be there, or the way should be closed or part of a relation. And I don't see the meaning of the 'fff' key. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-14 13:54:52 UTC	MichaelCollinson	Thanks Jan for finding this. Incomplete edit. I have completed it now.

49296525 by Risou	1	2017-06-14 11:48:15 UTC	mueschel	Kann man das wieder löschen?
	2	2017-06-18 08:48:59 UTC	Risou	Ja

49285188 by Andrew Matheny_import	1	2017-06-14 11:36:38 UTC	mueschel	This changeset contains another set of 380 misspelled address tags, addr_house, addr_stree. Please fix this before uploading!
	2	2017-06-14 14:38:23 UTC	Andrew Matheny	Corrected in changeset 49531966. Thanks!

49274153 by PASTA777	1	2017-06-14 11:31:07 UTC	mueschel	Hi, ich habe zwei Tipps zum Erfassen von Wegweisern: a) wenn du Keys wie 'direction_west_1' benutzt, schreibe 'direction_west:1', das ist die übliche Form zum Nummerieren. b) Ich empfehle Relationen um solche Schilder zu erfassen, das ist wesentlich genauer und einfacher auszuwerten, siehe: ...

49263155 by CIUDADES_AMIGABLES	1	2017-06-13 10:52:01 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of this container? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4896938441 "domestic_oil" is not used as a key up to now. Maybe "recycling:cooking_oil = yes"? Cheers, Jan

49265571 by BurnyB	1	2017-06-13 10:49:54 UTC	mueschel	Hi, kannst du hier mal nach dem Namen schauen? Da stimmt das Tagging nicht. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29468157 Gruss, Jan

49288920 by zvenzzon	1	2017-06-13 10:48:04 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this place node? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4898346197 "Lera = asphalt" looks like a mistake. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-13 10:59:15 UTC	zvenzzon	Thanks a lot, it's now corrected.

49259505 by szydzio	1	2017-06-13 10:38:34 UTC	mueschel	Hi, the tag you put on this node looks a bit strange: xmas \t= Traffic calming bump Did you mean "traffic_calming = bump"? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-13 12:50:31 UTC	szydzio	Hi! Yes indeed, I meant traffic_calming = bump. I was just an old node imported by OsmAnd which for some unknown reason adds this strange tag. I cleaned it up - thanks for the hint!

49236707 by thominator	1	2017-06-13 10:35:02 UTC	mueschel	Hi, kannst du hier nochmal über die Adressen schauen? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497998566 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497998573 Tags wie dieses sehen nach einem Fehler aus: 89a = Am Winkel Gruß, Jan

49471220 by kartonage	1	2017-06-13 10:25:40 UTC	mueschel	Hi, hier gibt es 97 Bäume mit dem Tag "de:genus". Das sollte richtig "genus:de" heißen. Schaust du da bitte nochmal drüber? Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-06-13 12:05:23 UTC	kartonage	Uff, richtig blöder Dreher. Habe es korrigiert, danke!

49461687 by lorandr_telenav	1	2017-06-13 10:23:11 UTC	mueschel	Hi, in your edits in this area I saw about 80 cases of a spelling mistake "destionation" instead of "destination". Could you please check this? Cheers, Jan

49247041 by Allroads	1	2017-06-12 10:54:59 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this barrier and the one close by? http://osm.org/node/4895536995 The tag "hoy =30" looks like a mistake. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-12 12:31:35 UTC	Allroads	Yes, changed it. i can not clarify, why this tag. I believe, I merged it. And was already there.

49448592 by herald93	1	2017-06-12 10:40:55 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the tag "source=google" here. Please not that information from google is not allowed to be added in OSM due to the terms of usage / licenses. Please remove the information you got from Google, otherwise we might have to delete the whole object. Jan

49201025 by JanisJf	1	2017-06-11 10:34:31 UTC	mueschel	Moin, kannst du bitte hier nochmal über die Adressen schauen? Das Tag "addr:coutry=DE" sollte eigentlich "addr:country=DE" sein - ist aber eigentlich auch unnötig, weil Grenzen bei uns sehr gut erfasst sind. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-06-12 10:47:37 UTC	JanisJf	Ja war ein doofer fortgeführter copy & paste Rechtschreibfehler :O Hab es schon gefixt. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49464049)

49249796 by AndersAndersson	1	2017-06-11 10:30:01 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found 3 nodes with strange tags like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4895835026 Looks like something went wrong with importing your GPS data. Could you have a look? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-11 10:36:47 UTC	AndersAndersson	Hello, Thanks for pointing that out. I add a lot of nodes from my GPS surveys. Sometimes I forget to remove the extra data that my Garmin GPS device adds. I have fixed that node now, and will do a search for similar data with overpass-turbo.eu.

49179382 by zwaygp	1	2017-06-11 10:22:50 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the tag "alt_ name" to 31 streets. Could you fix the spelling of the key, there should be no space, like "alt_name". Cheers, Jan

49286761 by mueschel	1	2017-06-07 20:15:57 UTC	trigpoint	Hi, this gate looks a little wrong as it has 3 ways connecting to it. It needs to be separate from the junction otherwise it is impossible to tell which routes pass through the gate, Cheers Phil
	2	2017-06-07 20:17:26 UTC	mueschel	Hi, that's not my work, it was added by http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49075370 Cheers, Jan
	3	2017-06-07 20:46:10 UTC	trigpoint	Hi Jan Sorry, I will see if I can work it out. Cheers Phil

49172285 by rowers2	1	2017-06-07 11:52:33 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found several objects with strange tags like 54 =77 601 =77 Could you check that? Cheers, Jan

49157495 by Helmut Pöhling	1	2017-06-07 11:38:50 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Bitte schau mal ins Wiki, wie Addressen und POIs bezeichnet werden müssen. All diese Informationen sind z.Z. nicht auswertbar, weil sie nicht dem normalen Schema entsprechen. adress \tEinener Dorfbauerschaft 30 ort \tWarendorf plz \t48231 telefon \t4925841666\...

49121355 by Lübeck	1	2017-06-07 11:28:11 UTC	mueschel	Hi, das Tag "capacity:undisabled" gibt es bis jetzt nirgends sonst. Warum nicht das normale "capacity:disabled"? Gruss, Jan

49143110 by Lineo	1	2017-06-06 11:15:27 UTC	mueschel	Hi, is "Koma-koma" the name of this river? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331458995 Cheers, Jan

49135629 by holgerd	1	2017-05-31 13:10:21 UTC	holgerd	the field paper: http://fieldpapers.org/snapshots/3dsblppm#17/52.49256790905722/13.42859263080393
	2	2017-06-06 11:00:26 UTC	mueschel	Hi, kannst du diesen Node nochmal überprüfen bzgl Toiletten? Gruß, Jan http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/700732539 toilets:wheelchair \tno toilets:wheelchair_1 \tyes

49222150 by frederic ademola	1	2017-06-06 10:56:28 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this is another set of nodes with no valid tag, but a lot of foreign stuff. Please clean up your data before importing it to OSM! Jan

49224334 by Sunfishtommy	1	2017-06-06 10:38:28 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this roundabout? It has several strange tags. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496820690 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-08 00:10:19 UTC	Sunfishtommy	I took away the tags I don't know where they came from.

49255973 by Charles_der_Geographieschüler	1	2017-06-05 20:39:08 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put the tag "dsscreated=#brunch" on several POIs, could you explain it? Btw, please have a look to the Wiki about tagging of opening_hours - there is a well defined syntax to make it machine-readable. Jan

49076257 by Yod4z	1	2017-06-05 20:34:30 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put these tags on some ways: maxweight = 3.5 maxweight:condition = yes @ service The conditional tag doesn't seem to be right (yes is not a valid value for maxweight and @ service is not defined) Can you explain what you want to tag here? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-05 20:37:43 UTC	Yod4z	the way is limited to 3.5 t but if the hgv is for service (trash, road construction...) it can go even if it has more than 3.5t.

49086332 by bielebog	1	2017-06-05 20:32:56 UTC	mueschel	Hi, schaust du hier mal nach dem Versuch des Öffnungszeiten-Taggings? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496768509 Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-06-05 20:47:43 UTC	bielebog	Ui, gut gesehen. Das war natürlich Quatsch und ist nun entfernt.

49021941 by Carmilio Simbine	1	2017-06-04 19:23:25 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you checkt the tagging of this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494161242 The tag looks a bit strange: "3 =\tcement_block" Cheers, Jan

49020216 by Supaplex	1	2017-06-04 19:06:46 UTC	mueschel	Hi, these 115 ways have the key "operater", which should read "operator". Could you have a look and fix this? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-06-05 02:12:47 UTC	Supaplex	Sure, I'll fix it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49254949

49001770 by MacLondon	1	2017-06-04 19:00:17 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found the tags "Gresham Street=no" and "Winchester Walk = no" in your edits. Could you explain this? Thanks, Jan
	2	2017-06-04 20:26:47 UTC	MacLondon	Sorry, these were pasted in error. I have removed them both, Thanks, Mac

49083364 by fkMohr	1	2017-06-03 16:46:14 UTC	kreuzschnabel	Diese Änderung hat Teile der Burgstraße etwa 300 m nach Westen verschoben, fast zum Bahnhof, und zehn andere, damit verbundene Straßen gleich hinterher! Sieht wild aus, ich bekomme das nicht auf die Schnelle sortiert. Baust du das bitte _gleich_ wieder zurück? Leider haben ...
	2	2017-06-03 19:13:39 UTC	mueschel	Großteils korrigiert in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49227401 Direkt am Platz östlich der Burg stimmt noch eine Kleinigkeit nicht, und die living_street-Fläche mit durchgehenden Straßen sieht merkwürdig aus, liegt aber nicht an diesem Changeset.
	3	2017-06-04 10:38:02 UTC	fkMohr	Ich bitte vielmals um Entschuldigung! Wollte lediglich die Wanderweg-Route aktualisieren. Als ich das mit den Straßen dann sah, wollte ich alles rückgängig machen, fand aber keine Möglichkeit mehr dazu. Kann man bereits gespeicherte Änderungen nicht mehr unwirksam machen?...
	4	2017-06-04 10:51:22 UTC	kreuzschnabel	Das mit dem Straßen-Ziehen muss ein Versehen gewesen sein; da waren wohl noch einige Nodes selektiert und sind dann mit der Maus mitgewandert. Wanderrouten werden in OSM als Relationen abgebildet, in denen die betreffenden Straßen(abschnitte) drin sind oder nicht; dazu muss eine Stra&szl...
	5	2017-06-04 11:03:30 UTC	fkMohr	Danke; ich hatte nach einer "Verschiebemöglichkeit" für die Wanderwege gesucht, aber nicht gefunden und hatte daher nicht mehr richtige Teile gelöscht und wollte die geänderte Route einfügen. Derzeit sind alle drei Routen (26, 28 & 29, wieso zweimal 28?) unterb...
	6	2017-06-04 11:35:54 UTC	fkMohr	Teilweise wurde die Führung von Weg 29 durch Weg 26 ersetzt; möglicherweise gibt es auch dafür ein Funktion, so dass Löschen und Neuerstellen nicht optimal wäre.
	7	2017-06-04 12:17:25 UTC	kreuzschnabel	Mein Hund lässt ausrichten, wenn du noch was im Kühlschrank hast, können wir auch gern einen kleinen Ausflug nach Oberjosbach unternehmen und uns das gemeinsam anschauen.
	8	2017-06-04 12:50:16 UTC	fkMohr	Ich bin zu Hause (Bohnheck 20, unweit BZO); nur Hundefutter habe ich nicht.
	9	2017-06-04 13:08:58 UTC	kreuzschnabel	Dann sach ich ma, wir stehen gegen 16 Uhr vor der Tür von http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368529588. Eventuelle Katzen am besten außer Sicht schaffen :-)
	10	2017-06-04 13:19:29 UTC	fkMohr	Freue mich, Euch kennenzulernen ...

49067413 by frederic ademola	1	2017-06-03 13:43:07 UTC	mueschel	Hi, these wells contain quite some foreign tags. E.g. lon and lat should not appear as tags in OSM, keys should not use capital letters. Could you have a look and correct this? Cheers, Jan

48998414 by Francesco Ferreri	1	2017-06-02 10:52:11 UTC	mueschel	Hi, did you really mean "bear = yes"? And, could you move the node to one side of the road? I guess the restaurant is not in the middle of the street?

49003042 by whb	1	2017-06-02 10:45:21 UTC	mueschel	Hi, hier gibt es einige Nodes mit ungewöhnlichen Tags wie "GB 58; GH = path". Könntest du da mal nachschauen und korrigieren? Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-06-07 10:54:39 UTC	whb	Danke für den Hinweis! Habe die Fehler verbessert.

49044715 by BCM927	1	2017-06-02 10:43:29 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added more than 30 ways with the tag "Highway=Footway" - please note that all tags are case sensitive and these should be lower case. Also, elevators are tagged "min level" and "max level". According to the wiki, this should be e.g. "level = 0;1;2;3&quo...

49006190 by sccmc	1	2017-06-02 10:30:48 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found several objects with very strange tags here, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496152016 area=89.7593806393 cota_p_a=55.41 fotografia=0 gid=44424 id_edifica=44424 id_lev=0.0 latlon=40°32'4.418"N 8°27'43.439"W perimetro=56.7...

49127811 by mueschel	1	2017-05-31 09:53:38 UTC	freeExec	please revert https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Lifecycle_prefix_.28.3Cstatus.3E:.3Ckey.3E_.3D_.3Cvalue.3E.29
	2	2017-05-31 10:12:44 UTC	mueschel	Hi, both versions are in use. The reason for my edit was your spelling mistake "constraction"
	3	2017-05-31 15:50:07 UTC	freeExec	It was necessary to correct the typo. And now marked by a kind of amenity that does not exist in reality. Secondly, after the opening, more work is done to return the tag.
	4	2017-05-31 16:25:37 UTC	mueschel	Alright, I changed it back.

49127871 by mueschel	1	2017-05-31 09:09:03 UTC	opendcc	Bicycle = official on a non rectangular building? Are you sure?
	2	2017-05-31 09:19:28 UTC	mueschel	You're right, that's strange. I didn't put the tag there. I fixed the spelling of the key, but didn't notice it being strange for a building. We have to ask rowers2, e.g. in this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48947839

41058789 by mueschel	1	2017-05-29 16:05:25 UTC	Markus366	Hallo, dieser und weitere Abschnitte einer geplanten/ im Bau befindlichen Straßen wurden zuletzt mehrfach von verschiedenen Nutzern unterschiedlich getaggt. Häufig wurden die Schlüssel highway:construction , trunk: und construction: hin und her geändert. Vielleicht können ...
	2	2017-05-29 17:14:33 UTC	mueschel	Siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48979895

48979895 by MrWebber	1	2017-05-29 16:02:49 UTC	Markus366	Hallo, dieser und weitere Abschnitte einer geplanten/ im Bau befindlichen Straßen wurde zuletzt mehrfach von verschiedenen Nutzern unterschiedliche getaggt. Häufig wurden die Schlüssel highway:construction , trunk: und construction: hin und her geändert. Vielleicht können...
	2	2017-05-29 16:29:13 UTC	MrWebber	Hallo, Ich weiß gar nicht wo das Problem noch liegt. Ich habe alle Fehler verbessert. Gruß MrWebber
	3	2017-05-29 17:14:17 UTC	mueschel	Dann kommentiere ich auch hier und nicht in meinem Changeset: Erst highway = proposed, dann highway = construction (zunächst mit Tippfehler den ich korrigiert habe). Die letzte Änderung von t2425 verstehe ich nicht ganz, aber das hast du dann ja wieder geradegezogen.

48905063 by Huy Thành	1	2017-05-28 10:53:58 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you uploaded many objects with very strange tags here, like these: addr:place \t02050 building \ttran thanh toan highway \tdhok landuse \t16092737352 place \t0340302730 shop \t56/26 This looks like something went wrong during an import. Can this be reverted? Jan

48921470 by De Molen	1	2017-05-28 10:50:21 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the key "traffic_signals:directions" 16 times - the correct spelling would be "traffic_signals:direction". Could you fix this? Cheers, Jan

48893785 by LAEM	1	2017-05-28 10:42:43 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I saw this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495243526 The tag "loading zone = yes" doesn't exist yet. Would these tags be what you try to express? highway = service area = yes vehicle = delivery ?
	2	2017-05-29 17:42:52 UTC	LAEM	Hi, Yes, thank you.

48895354 by emga	1	2017-05-28 10:35:59 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, ich habe hier an einigen Nodes den Key "slope_curb" gesehen, "sloped_curb" wäre richtig. Schaust du da mal nach? Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-05-28 16:04:00 UTC	emga	Hopla, das sollte natürlich nicht sein, da hab ich mich vertippt. Schau es mir an!
	3	2017-05-28 16:22:42 UTC	emga	Sollte passen, Danke für den Hinweis

48891473 by Thoschi	1	2017-05-28 10:34:32 UTC	mueschel	Moin, habe hier an 11 Nodes den Key "sloped_curbs" gesehen - "sloped_curb" wäre richtig. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-05-28 11:14:07 UTC	Thoschi	Hi, danke für den Hinweis. Habe aber jetzt auf die Schnelle nur 6 Nodes wiedergefunden (und geändert). Gruß Thorsten

48864007 by gosausee	1	2017-05-28 10:22:56 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this node? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4868074917 The tag seems strange: 5653 = sv:Gora_Sad-Ishtrag
	2	2017-05-28 17:05:30 UTC	gosausee	@mueschel: thx 4 your info. i changed it!

48972693 by marianp_telenav	1	2017-05-28 10:19:45 UTC	mueschel	Hi, something went wrong here: You didn't "remove unnecesary tags", but added 100 nodes with just a strange "@id" tag. Could you fix this? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-05-29 05:55:40 UTC	marianp_telenav	Done! Thank's! Regards, Marian

48790191 by captaine	1	2017-05-26 09:02:47 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put the tag "barriere = all" on 24 ways - looks like a mistake. Did you mean "barrier = wall"? Cheers, Jan

48794218 by ToniE	1	2017-05-26 08:59:48 UTC	mueschel	Hi, deine erste Version "bus_bay =left" ist die laut Wiki korrekte. Das Suffix :left soll nur verwendet werden um weitere Eigenschaften anzugeben. Und ist auch nur dann nötig, wenn bus_bay = both und die Eigenschaften auf beiden Seiten unterschiedlich sind. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-05-26 10:28:49 UTC	ToniE	Danke Jan, dann werde ich mal in mich gehen und nachvollziehen, wo ich das bisher schon gemapped habe. Außer hier wohl nur am westlichen Teil der Truderinger Straße - glaub' ich. Gruß Toni

48787537 by GoetheUniversitaet	1	2017-05-24 18:44:32 UTC	mueschel	Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert - viele Gebäudedetails gelöscht.
	2	2017-05-24 18:46:28 UTC	mueschel	Zur Information: Die meisten Gebäude am Campus waren mit vollständigem 3D-Mapping erfasst, siehe z.B. hier: http://maps.osm2world.org/?zoom=18&lat=50.17364&lon=8.63088&layers=B0TTFF Die meisten dieser Informationen wurden hier gelöscht.

48787863 by GoetheUniversitaet	1	2017-05-24 18:40:29 UTC	mueschel	Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert (Dach gelöscht)

48787105 by GoetheUniversitaet	1	2017-05-24 18:38:44 UTC	mueschel	Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert - doppelter POI node, Löschen von existierenden Objekten.

48787820 by GoetheUniversitaet	1	2017-05-24 18:36:52 UTC	mueschel	Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert (Löschen von Gebäudedetails)

48787276 by GoetheUniversitaet	1	2017-05-24 09:06:25 UTC	mueschel	Warum hast du hier alle Informationen zu den Gebäuden (Aussehen, Höhe etc.) gelöscht?
	2	2017-05-24 09:12:12 UTC	GoetheUniversitaet	Sorry, wenn das so war, dann ohne Absicht. Kannst du es wieder zurücksetzen? Sind noch neu, kennen uns noch nicht so gut aus. Wir ergänzen auch gleich unser Profil mit weiteren Infos.
	3	2017-05-24 18:35:44 UTC	mueschel	Ich habe diese Löschung eines Gebäudeteils und Gebäudedetails revertiert.

48787295 by GoetheUniversitaet	1	2017-05-24 18:35:32 UTC	mueschel	Ich habe diese Löschung eines existierenden Gebäudeteils revertiert.

48772951 by muindre	1	2017-05-24 11:30:39 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this way got many strange tags - could you check this? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494283585 altitudeMode = null begin = null building = yes description = null drawOrder = null end = null extrude = 0 icon = null postal = yes tessellate = -1 timestamp = nul...

48919542 by Saliou Ndour	1	2017-05-24 11:21:19 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I saw the tag "being=sourse" on many objects. Did you want to write "source = bing"? Cheers, Jan

48744910 by micahcochran	1	2017-05-23 20:39:38 UTC	mueschel	Hi, in your edits you used the keys faa:LFSN faa:LSFN FAA:LSFN Could you use just one spelling? Jan
	2	2017-05-23 20:40:25 UTC	mueschel	Addendum: FAA:LFSN is used 52 times already
	3	2017-05-24 13:35:32 UTC	micahcochran	I'll try to do better spelling it. You are correct that it should be FAA:LFSN. This is "FAA's Landing Facility Site Number". I should probably remove it when there is some other kind of ID. Thanks, Micah

48874528 by pembenjumat	1	2017-05-23 17:26:29 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM! I found tags like Jumlah Lantai=1 Kedalaman Pondasi=1 meter Material Bangunan=Balok Semen Ventilasi=ada jenis atap=genteng jenis lantai=Keramik on several objects. This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software c...

48872323 by TheDutchMan13	1	2017-05-22 10:19:49 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found 1880 objects with tags like "@id = way/5678989" This looks like a mistake - could you have a look and fix it? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-05-22 19:41:02 UTC	TheDutchMan13	Yeah i'll check it out now
	3	2017-05-24 14:44:05 UTC	TheDutchMan13	Reverted due to unknown errors http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48949502
	4	2017-05-24 14:44:33 UTC	TheDutchMan13	Should be fixed now. Took me a few days to figure it out.

46317769 by Prince Kassad	1	2017-05-21 17:52:52 UTC	mueschel	Moin, du hast dieser Straße zwei maxspeeds verpasst, kannst du das mal nachprüfen? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177853840/history
	2	2017-05-21 21:32:51 UTC	Prince Kassad	das war definitiv nicht beabsichtigt. Anscheinend hatte vorher jede Fahrtrichtung ein unterschiedliches maxspeed (30 hin und 50 zurück), woraus dann beim Zusammenfügen "maxspeed=30;50" wurde. Ohne vor Ort gewesen zu sein müsste man aber raten, ob jetzt 30 oder 50 gilt. Was d...
	3	2017-05-21 21:36:42 UTC	Prince Kassad	Ich hab gerade gesehen dass es für die Ecke frische Mapillary-Bilder gibt. Demnach ist definitiv 30 richtig (ist eine Tempo-30-Zone), 50 ist Schmarrn. Hab das auch schon korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48871202

48665821 by mmahmud	1	2017-05-21 16:48:53 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found four buildings with the tag "ODK =OMK". Looks like a mistake, could you check that? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-05-26 05:15:39 UTC	mmahmud	Hi, thanks for showing me this. Somehow it got pasted on the features. I will correct them. :)

48191429 by jaybe	1	2017-05-20 15:39:59 UTC	mueschel	Diese Straße ist nicht komplett gesperrt, sondern z.Z. nur ein kleiner Abschnitt westlich des Waldes.

24104667 by HGSandhagen	1	2017-05-20 13:45:25 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, du hast hier in den letzten Jahren ja so einige Wanderrouten eingetragen. Bei den Längenangaben mit dem "distance" Tag hast du aber Kommazahlen benutzt anstelle des in OSM üblichen englischen Punktes als Dezimaltrenner. Würdest du da vielleicht bei Gelegenheit einen ...
	2	2017-06-05 09:28:53 UTC	HGSandhagen	Hallo Jan, ich habe die Distanzen der Wanderrouten "OSM-konform" geändert. Gruß, Hans-Gerd

48059515 by Radmaroeder	1	2017-05-20 13:18:32 UTC	mueschel	Hi, ich finde hier einige Wege, bei denen du das "incline" Tag geändert hast, z.B. von "2%" auf den merkwürdigen Text "up,_down,_5%". Könntest du das bitte wieder korrigieren? Gruß, Jan

48597015 by altay ozcan	1	2017-05-19 10:48:55 UTC	mueschel	Hi, it looks like you used these tags to describe the Symbol for this route? background \tred_frame foreground1 \tred_rectangle foreground2 \twhite_rectangle We do have the key "osmc:symbol" to describe such symbols. Cheers, Jan

48774795 by LafarM	1	2017-05-19 08:54:15 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I saw that you are adding destination tags to roads. I would like to remind you that the order of the parts of a key is important, it should always be: key[:subkey][:lanes][:forward\|:backward] e.g. destination:colour:lanes:backward I saw a few keys where this order is mixed. Cheers, Jan

48757646 by PortBcn - Planol	1	2017-05-19 08:46:43 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you please check this import of nodes? All of them have many foreign keys which should not appear in the OSM data base. The one common key (building=yes) should not be there, because these nodes are not the actual building, which are already in the database. Jan http://www.openstreetm...

48599917 by SAnugroho	1	2017-05-16 10:50:28 UTC	mueschel	Hi, some of the ways have strange tags, can they be removed? All necessary information is contained in the relations you added as well. E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492834831 Jan
	2	2017-07-26 18:39:01 UTC	SAnugroho	Sorry, late response. Already fixed by changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49180151 Thank you.

48533074 by SAnugroho	1	2017-05-16 10:44:26 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this way? It has only foreign keys: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492361529 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-07-26 18:20:27 UTC	SAnugroho	Sorry, late respond. Fixed by changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50566679 Thank you.

48702078 by Даниил С	1	2017-05-16 10:36:55 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please watch out for the spelling of keys. On 35 nodes I found "water_tankt:housenumber" instead of "water_tank:housenumber" Could you have a look and correct these? Cheers, Jan

48699784 by Павел Гетманцев	1	2017-05-16 10:35:00 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I would like to point you to the "Date Namespace": This makes historical entries like yours much easier to read, e.g. Instead of: was:2:name \tБородинская улица was:2:name:end_date \t1918 was:2:name:fi \tBorodinonkatu was:2:name:ru \tБородинская ули�...

48674669 by mueschel	1	2017-05-14 17:54:29 UTC	Peilscheibe	Hallo mueschel, gibt es irgendeinen besonderen Grund für die Entfernung einer zutreffenden Information? Wurde das Schild geändert?
	2	2017-05-14 17:57:03 UTC	mueschel	Die Information war doppelt vorhanden. Ich habe nur eine der beiden Angaben "Rietheim 4.3 km;Terrassenfreibad 0.4 km" entfernt.
	3	2017-05-14 20:52:04 UTC	Peilscheibe	Das war kein Duplikat, das war ein Hinweis auf einen Fehler am Schild. Genauer: was Du gelöscht hast, ist exakt der Text, der auf dem Schild steht (*:signposted). Ich habe das mal wiederhergestellt.
	4	2017-05-14 20:59:30 UTC	mueschel	Dann schreib doch da bitte eine note="Schreibfehler 'Terasse' auch auf Schild vorhanden", das verstehen dann auch andere Mapper. Neu erfundene Tags, deren Wert eine (fast) Kopie eines anderen Tags sind, versteht niemand und verwirren nur.

48479151 by cstp	1	2017-05-08 18:50:54 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM. What did you try to add to the database? All nodes you added have some foreign tags which should not be here, and don't have any meaningful ones. Jan
	2	2017-05-14 14:14:45 UTC	mueschel	I just reverted these edits as they did not contain any valuable additional information to data already existing.
	3	2017-05-14 20:43:07 UTC	geow	Hi cstp, if you are intending to create a route for ski mountaineering (scialpinismo), you might use a route relation with "type=route + route=piste + piste:type=skitour" see http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4663751 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5280864 Ciao geow\...

48459438 by bazbazbaz	1	2017-05-13 13:00:50 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put the key "gateway = yes" on this node - did you mean "barrier = gate"? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4838972161 Cheers, Jan

48451882 by Richard L	1	2017-05-13 11:41:03 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found some ways with all foreign tags, and no usual OSM tags: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/p1l Could you have a look? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-05-13 19:38:58 UTC	Richard L	Fixed my one and also another one I found. Thanks for notifying

48437778 by pyram	1	2017-05-12 10:58:17 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the Korean key on this relation: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6939871/history It's new and I don't really see where it comes from. Jan
	2	2017-05-12 21:06:15 UTC	pyram	Sorry, maybe a copy&paste-error (no idea). Thanks for the error check. Now I fixed the needless one-way-relation too (=> way).

48591782 by LafarM	1	2017-05-12 10:41:53 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the key "cossing_ref" 78 times. Correct would be "crossing_ref". Could you have a look and fix this? Cheers, Jan

48573008 by d3mol3k	1	2017-05-11 09:32:23 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added some trees with strange tags like these: 529=zł przy=odbiorze 197=162 Could you have a look and correct this? Here is a map with all these nodes: http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(node%5B%22529%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22529%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22529%22%5D%3B)...
	2	2017-05-11 14:46:29 UTC	d3mol3k	Thanks for paying attention - something got pasted (I do not know how) - corrected

48055710 by agab29	1	2017-05-10 11:13:48 UTC	mueschel	Hi, just a hint: You used the tag combination "building = yes" "wall = no". You can use "building = roof" instead. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-05-11 10:12:51 UTC	agab29	Hello Jan, Unfortunately this building tag is automatically generated by french import cadastre tool. May be could you suggest your idea to developer at https://trac.openstreetmap.fr/newticket Best regards André

48344189 by sebastic	1	2017-05-09 10:49:56 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this way got rather strange tags, could you check and correct that? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34792962 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-05-09 11:02:07 UTC	sebastic	Please adjust the tags as you see fit. The the tags from the outer way were simply moved to the relation as part of the old-style multipolygon fixing effort. There is a lot of import data in these regions, that is for the local community to deal with.
	3	2017-05-09 11:18:53 UTC	mueschel	Hi, thanks for the reply. I think the situation is different for this way, have a look to the full history: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/34792962 It was natural=wood until a week ago, then all tags were deleted by someone else and you added some new tags. I don't see that this w...
	4	2017-05-09 11:30:22 UTC	sebastic	There were a lot of duplicate node issues in this area. Those were fixed after the JOSM validator reported the issues before uploading the previously old-style multipolygons.
	5	2017-05-09 17:25:00 UTC	mueschel	I guess natural=wood is right and the rest can be removed?
	6	2017-05-09 18:50:27 UTC	sebastic	The tags seem to imply so, double check with satellite imagery.
	7	2017-05-09 18:55:54 UTC	mueschel	Looks fine. I just changed it.

48502290 by corinne_j	1	2017-05-09 10:39:15 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM. In this edit, a few mistakes happened. The tag "amenity=parking" should be put on the area only, but not on all of the nodes the area consists of. Second, many objects contain many foreign keys which do not belong in the OSM database and should be removed; E.g. col...

48311920 by Порфирий	1	2017-05-08 19:54:33 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the name of this street? It only has a "nameol" and "old_name" tag. Cheers, Jan

48314783 by gekapes	1	2017-05-08 19:52:57 UTC	mueschel	Moin, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127365799 note:motor_vehicle:backward \t= "Zubringerdienst gestattet" Ist das nicht das, was OSM unter "destination" versteht? In DE entspricht das dem "Anlieger frei". Gruß, Jan

48487153 by Scott Young	1	2017-05-08 18:59:16 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM. Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags - e.g. you added several buildings with the tag "builing" instead of "building". Cheers, Jan

48288629 by Cassini97	1	2017-05-06 14:19:25 UTC	mueschel	Hi, dieses Tor hat ein merkwürdiges Tag "max4:10". Kannst du da mal nachschauen? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4827515404 Jan
	2	2017-05-06 17:50:21 UTC	Cassini97	Salve Jan! Ist doch frängggisch! ;-) Geändert... jedenfalls, wenn ich die Sitzung gleich hochlade! Dank und Gruß!

48279528 by Carto'Cité	1	2017-05-06 14:18:01 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put the tag "mofa = n" on this bridge: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490496091 (and its other parts) Is it 'mofa = no' or 'moped = no'? Jan
	2	2017-05-06 14:39:56 UTC	Carto'Cité	Thank for noticing. This has now been fixed to moped=no. Antoine.

48335007 by West Midlands Combined Authority	1	2017-05-06 13:44:56 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the tag "NaPTANAreaCode" to all of these nodes. I guess this should be converted to "naptan:AtcoCode", as this is a tag used in many other places already. Jan

48367057 by Michi92	1	2017-05-06 13:42:51 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added many strange tags here, like these: EntityHand=AEB ExtendedEn=3 gros { FACING_3 PTE EXT } FACING_3-E01PTE 109710 38.1 0.0 5 { 0 0 0 0 } Layer=GROS$ SubClasses=AcDbEntity:AcDbPolyline What is the meaning of all this? Also, indoor corridors should be tagged as ind...
	2	2017-05-08 13:09:17 UTC	Michi92	Dear Jan, those tags descend from the shape files from which the map was created. For this reason, they will be removed as soon as possible. The tag highway=footway is necessary to guarantee the beta navigation as Adrien Pavie suggested. Cheers, Michela
	3	2017-06-03 09:10:20 UTC	mmd	Those shapefiles seem to originate from some AutoCAD files. How about the copyright status of those files? In any case, has this been discussed with the community beforehand? Are you aware of the following process? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import
	4	2017-06-04 18:28:34 UTC	Michi92	Dear mmd, the shapefiles were originated from Quantum Gis software, which is open source. Moreover the plans were officially provided from the building office of "Sapienza" University of Rome . With my warmest regards, Michela
	5	2017-06-04 18:32:16 UTC	mmd	FYI: OSM Data Working Group (DWG) has already started reverting your imports as they don't adhere to OSM standards: see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49230231 as an example.

48433534 by robin0van0der0vliet	1	2017-05-06 13:39:04 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the tag "name:tok" to many countries. Which language does 'tok' refer to? I can't find it in the list of ISO 639 language codes. Jan

48381008 by kmoses28	1	2017-05-06 13:36:45 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this village consists of social facilities only? There are many ways overlapping each other and the objects have tags (like 'facility_t') which don't seem to belong in the OSM database. Could you have a look and correct these issues?
	2	2017-05-06 20:38:48 UTC	kmoses28	These tags are in the process of being cleaned up.

44859352 by Danymu	1	2017-05-06 11:48:08 UTC	mueschel	Hi, bitte denke daran Knoten zu setzen wenn zwei Wege sich kreuzen, z.B. ein Fußweg der eine Straße überquert. Habe gerade einige solcher Punkte in Michelstadt korrigiert. Gruß, Jan

48430013 by Sammelmuetze	1	2017-05-06 11:32:00 UTC	mueschel	Vorsicht beim Korrigieren von diesen duplicate ways - in der Gegend von Würzburg ist das momentane Problem nicht mit ein paar lokalen Edits zu lösen, die machen es eher noch schlimmer weil Reverts nicht mehr möglich sind. z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491622891 Gruß...

48390776 by bw52	1	2017-05-06 11:29:06 UTC	mueschel	Bitte füge keine neuen Wege mehr hinzu die mit anderen Wegen überlappen. Hier in der Region ist ein riesiges Chaos entstanden, das ersteinmal beseitigt werden muss.

47547633 by opengislab	1	2017-04-08 11:40:55 UTC	mueschel	Hi, what are all these tags you put on 250++ ways? They are new, not used anywhere else and don't seem to be documented. escala=drenajes a 1:25000 estado_dre=5102 fecha_modi=08/04/2015 responsabl=Alejandra Gómez Sarmiento ruleid=1 vigencia=0 Thanks, Jan
	2	2017-05-04 15:31:05 UTC	opengislab	I tell you because those attributes are that way. This disaster happened on April 1, 2017. In Mocoa there was very little information, the task was activated in tasking manager of OSM Colombia, https://tareas.openstreetmap.co/project/50 In two days we managed to map the necessary and the result...
	3	2017-05-04 15:59:10 UTC	mueschel	I know that this is very useful information and we should try to have this information in the database. You write: "igac information was used, which is available and can be used under conditions , And one of them is not to lose the original attributes." I'm sorry to say, but this mean...

48211221 by Federico Explorador	1	2017-05-03 08:45:44 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this tagging? Is Frailes the name? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171545533 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-05-03 14:43:25 UTC	Federico Explorador	Hi Jan, I think it is "Fraile", according to IGAC maps, but I have no field evidence for the rivers name.
	3	2017-05-04 10:24:11 UTC	mueschel	Alright. I'll change the tag "Fraile = Fraile" to "name = Fraile".

48226307 by hanoj	1	2017-05-03 09:30:57 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this tagging? The maxspeed tag is strange: openstreetmap.org/way/490097570 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-05-03 09:37:08 UTC	hanoj	Thanks, I know about tag fail, but I dont found it. Now is correct.

48196368 by TBKMrt	1	2017-05-03 08:58:18 UTC	mueschel	Hi, hier sind einige Wege mit dem Tag "30=177" entstanden. Schaust du da nochmal nach? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35780993#map=17/47.84284/16.68863 Gruss, Jan
	2	2017-05-04 05:58:24 UTC	TBKMrt	Hätte maxspeed=30 werden sollen. Danke für den Hinweis - ist korrigiert in #48383540.

48281039 by Hendrikklaas	1	2017-05-02 11:11:02 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the key "building_material" to 127 objects. The usual spelling is "building:material" with ':' instead of '_'. Could you have a look and correct this? Cheers, Jan

48299994 by q_un_go	1	2017-05-02 11:08:58 UTC	mueschel	Moin, was heißt denn "Alfie=Allen" an 30 Bäumen hier? Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-05-02 16:22:05 UTC	q_un_go	Moin, das frage ich mich auch. Keine Ahnung wie mir das passiert ist. Nun ja, nun ist der Alf wieder ein Alien und kein Allen. Gruß Winfried

45772442 by Separis	1	2017-04-30 17:20:51 UTC	mueschel	Hi, kannst du mal nach dieser Straße schauen? Du hast ihr "maxspeed=50;30" verpasst, aber nur ein Wert kann stimmen. http://osm.org/way/29341035 Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-05-01 19:06:58 UTC	Separis	Oh, danke für den Hinweis. Weiß auch nicht, wie die 30 da reingerutscht ist. Hab ich korrigiert. Gruß Werner

46903657 by Seehundeführer	1	2017-04-30 16:47:09 UTC	mueschel	Hi, meintest du hier eventuell "springy"? "swingy" ist mir unbekannt. http://osm.org/node/4738337035 Gruß, Jan

48094845 by taxi301	1	2017-04-25 15:09:21 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you have a look to 40 trees added in this changeset? They have the tag "crown_type:=I" Note the ':' in the key which shouldn't be there. Could you have a look and fix that? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-04-27 08:44:19 UTC	taxi301	Hi . This is a proposal how to improve the tagging of trees (natural=tree) for the use in 3D-applications. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Marek_kleciak/Tree_table I was curious if it would show up in 3D, I would improve on type = palm Sorry for my English but only by translator. Regar...
	3	2017-04-27 17:18:48 UTC	mueschel	Your tagging is fine. Just a spelling mistake: You write: "crown_type:" But it should be: "crown_type"

48027059 by fgouget	1	2017-04-26 09:49:16 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging changes? E.g. 'ref:-2001-02-12' is not a valid key. There should be a double '--' when using dates according to the wiki. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-04-27 08:35:01 UTC	fgouget	As far as I can tell the wiki says to use " key:-date = value", and that the use of '--' is outdated: "An older version of ISO 8601 used the double hyphen to replace omitted years in partial dates". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Date_nam...
	3	2017-04-27 17:16:24 UTC	mueschel	Indeed, it does. Since 7 days at least. There is an extensive discussion on the talk page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Date_specification

48056405 by mueschel	1	2017-04-25 12:56:34 UTC	lenny32	The addr:* node already exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1522397032 There is no need to create another one at the restaurant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema
	2	2017-04-25 17:51:27 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I'm not aware of any tool that makes use of these tags. For most applications the tagged address was unusable. The existence of another node close by with address information is not sufficient to find the actual address of this POI. The only case how addresses of another object can be used on...
	3	2017-04-26 06:30:46 UTC	dgitto	It is the tool that have to follow (use) a schema. Not the tag schema follow some tools. Is normal that no tools exist, when a schema starts to be used. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema
	4	2017-04-26 08:07:33 UTC	mueschel	Until this schema has been adopted, we have to stick to the old scheme, otherwise we lose information. I.e. both tags have to exist in parallel. But, I really doubt that any tool will use this tagging, based on a 4 year old draft without even an RFC.
	5	2017-04-26 09:20:24 UTC	lenny32	It seems to me that an address should be unique (it exists with or without POI) it is an object in its own right. Many POIs have no address. If it is the same node, when the POI disappears or moves, the address may be deleted or moved with the poi by the inattentive contributor. Contact information...

48087408 by Shuman	1	2017-04-25 15:08:07 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this changeset created 9 relations with no common tags - could you check this and replace the foreign keys with common ones if necesseary? Cheers, Jan

48056292 by mueschel	1	2017-04-24 21:36:00 UTC	Athalis	Hi, beim way 407255155 wolltest du wahrscheinlich wie bei den anderen Wegen das Komma durch einen Punkt austauschen? Sieht aus als ob der Punkt verloren gegangen ist ;)
	2	2017-04-24 21:47:00 UTC	mueschel	Ja, der Verdacht liegt nahe ;-) Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe es korrigiert.

47990728 by lenux	1	2017-04-24 10:47:58 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this node, it has a strange tag: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4806907046 80-84= 41-55 Cheers, Jan

47993682 by prins123	1	2017-04-24 10:42:49 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added some strange tags to objects, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488399710 "Market = Sub Post Office" and several more. What is the meaning of this? Please have a look to the wiki to find out how common features like shops have to be tagged to be shown on the map. ...

47901729 by mueschel	1	2017-04-22 15:17:14 UTC	damjang	Ok, but so the wiki must be corrected: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone :-)
	2	2017-04-23 13:32:49 UTC	mueschel	You're right. Looks like somebody wants to distinguish between phone service in Italian language (:it) and an phone number to be reached from Italy only (:IT). Kind of makes sense but is hard to remember.
	3	2017-04-23 21:37:35 UTC	damjang	Bacause this is a phone number free only usable from Italy, if for you is ok, I will rechange to upper chars (phone:IT)
	4	2017-04-24 09:36:57 UTC	mueschel	Yes, sure. It was my mistake.

47976457 by Andy78_DE	1	2017-04-23 10:47:38 UTC	mueschel	Hi, schaust du bei diesem Weg nochmal nach den beiden lanes* Tags? Da ist etwas schiefgegangen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297874842 Gruss, Jan

47795929 by johanespeter9	1	2017-04-22 11:15:39 UTC	mueschel	Hi, the correct tag "addr:housenumber" was changed to the wrong tag "adr:housenumber" on 18.000 buildings in this city. Some of these changes where done in this changeset. Could you fix that - or let me know if you need help with it. Cheers, Jan

47937826 by wambe	1	2017-04-21 08:47:09 UTC	mueschel	Hi, kannst du nochmal nach dem Tagging schauen '_vertical' ist ein ungewöhnlicher Key. Gruß, Jan

29409537 by tanjeff	1	2017-04-20 19:00:32 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you explain the "housename" on this building? http://osm.org/way/332283894 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-04-28 06:38:32 UTC	tanjeff	Hello Jan, the buildings at Layenhof have 4-digit numbers which I mapped as addr:housenumber. The building you mentioned seems to have two numbers (63 and 5872), but I don't remember the details. I will check that when I'm there again (might take 2 weeks). I will add a further comment then. Regard...
	3	2017-06-11 12:17:45 UTC	tanjeff	Hello Jan, Sorry for the delay, I was quite busy. As I wrote, the houses in the area have 4-digit numbers. For most buildings, I mapped this number as addr:housenumber. But the building in question has two numbers: 64 (not 63) and 5872. I guess that 64 is the number to use when sending letters, ...

47814728 by CarlFriedrich	1	2017-04-20 18:56:29 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, kannst du nochmal über diese 3 Relationen schauen? Eine ist nicht geschlossen, alle drei haben keinen Namen http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159115 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159792 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159745 Gruß,...

47876419 by hbrown14	1	2017-04-20 10:40:59 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you tagged some buildings with "building:wall" and "building:roof". I replaced these tags with the common building:material and roof:material keys. These are in use in many places and are defined in the wiki. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-04-20 13:51:21 UTC	hbrown14	Hi - Thanks! I feel so silly about this tagging mistake. I'll be sure to fix the remaining tag mistakes in this area. Sudie

47726803 by Lowe253	1	2017-04-15 16:38:39 UTC	mueschel	Hi, it's a bit strange that this railway in Greece uses German signaling. Could you check that? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4790883029 Jan
	2	2017-04-19 03:44:15 UTC	Lowe253	Hi Jan, Greek Railways do actually uses german signalling although this might sound bizarre to people. This is not a full replication of ESO, but a lite version (no train protection system, no electrified rails until late 90's and so on). If you try wikipedia you can check also the historical reas...
	3	2017-04-19 09:04:14 UTC	mueschel	Alright, I wasn't aware of this. I stumbled across it because of a spelling mistake: railway:signal:main:f should be railway:signal:main:form, I think.
	4	2017-04-19 10:42:03 UTC	Lowe253	You are right, my bad...

47841652 by Rps333	1	2017-04-18 10:57:07 UTC	mueschel	Hi, these POIs have some foreign tags that could (and should) be converted to usual OSM tags, e.g. ACCESSIBLE ADDRESS ADDRESS_FR NAME_FR NOTES Could you have a look? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-04-18 10:59:23 UTC	Rps333	I will have a look. thanks

47885359 by jagdpächter	1	2017-04-18 10:34:42 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, du erfindest hier (mal wieder) Unmengen an neuen Tags. Bitte informiere dich über gängige Tags. In der jetztigen Form sind diese Informationen absolut nutzlos. Beispiele: bicycle situation bicycle designating Sign\t Bicycle path color to walkway cycle end cycle path quality\t...

47794200 by EnigmaQuip	1	2017-04-17 11:14:07 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this building, it has many strange tags: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486855572 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-04-17 21:19:55 UTC	EnigmaQuip	Fixed, sorry about that

47608054 by MRPockets	1	2017-04-13 08:36:09 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added some nodes with tags light "light_source". Street lamps usually are tagged with "highway=street_lamp", which should be there additional to your tags. Would you mind adding it? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-04-13 14:19:51 UTC	MRPockets	I specifically chose not to tag them as "highway=street_lamp" since they are not street lamps. They illuminate primarily the grass and sidewalks, not streets. I could not find any better tags for non-street lamps than simply "light_source=lantern." If I am misunderstanding the us...
	3	2017-04-16 19:59:08 UTC	mueschel	I don't think we do distinguish between street lamps and path lamps. Until we come up with a distinction, I opt for tagging them with the common tag to make them visible on existing maps.

47784601 by Arnaud D-SIDD	1	2017-04-16 16:32:48 UTC	mueschel	Hi, something went wrong with this import. The nodes are spread over the ocean... Also, "Adresse" and "Nom" are no common tags in OSM and should be properly tagged. Jan
	2	2017-04-19 21:52:39 UTC	SomeoneElse	@mueschel no reply here so I've reverted these additions and sent the user a message that they have to read before continuing editing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1320 . Best Regards, Andy

47775927 by the_real_emj	1	2017-04-16 16:26:30 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put some urls to maps in the tags of these objects. I assume you used these as the source of your edits? To you have an permit to use these maps or are these licensed under a license compatible to ODbL? Jan
	2	2017-04-17 10:55:44 UTC	emj	Hej, nej detta är ett resultat av cykelturer sedan den snöfria nyårsaftonen till nu. Öppettiderna är från hemsidan dock, jag hade bara fotat dessa på tre av ställena. Jag gör ganska många kartläggningar som jag inte lägger upp men n&...
	3	2017-04-17 10:57:17 UTC	emj	English: Yes I've a ODBL + Contributors Term Compatible source for the edit. I'm sorry I was trollnig about the import.

39178527 by maction	1	2017-04-15 14:51:00 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, du hast hier das highway-Tag entfernt, aber es laufen noch einige Wanderrouten über diesen Weg. Wie sieht das vor Ort wirklich aus? http://osm.org/way/23325729 Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-04-16 16:51:05 UTC	maction	Hallo Jan, nachdem die Neugestaltung der Rheinwiesen und der Uferpromenade gestartet war, hatte ich das Attribut highway der betroffenen Straßen und Wege entsprechend dem damaligen (4/2016) Zustand mit dem Lifecycle-Prefix demolished versehen. Heute sind die neuen und teils alten Straße...

47730311 by kumbanamargaret	1	2017-04-14 11:09:01 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added more than 6000 buildings with a misspelled house number tag: "adr:housenumber" instead of "addr:housenumber". Could you have a look and fix that? Let me know if you need help. Jan

47600694 by zerpou	1	2017-04-12 11:29:51 UTC	mueschel	Hi, there are six nodes like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4784899723 They don't have any common tag. Could you have a look? Jan
	2	2017-04-12 11:48:37 UTC	zerpou	Hi Jan, I have integrated these points with her substations Have a good day, Albin

47565504 by dalop	1	2017-04-12 10:36:21 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of these 3 rivers? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485498407 The tag "Barranco del Pico = Rio Nuerna" looks a bit strange. Jan
	2	2017-04-12 11:44:39 UTC	dalop	Thanks for the advise, It was my mistake! I just fixed that now

47657408 by Salkin74	1	2017-04-12 08:51:47 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found 80 buildings with many foreign tags like the ones shown below. I don't think they belong into the OSM database - can they be removed? Cheers, Jan ADAT=2013-05-08 09:04 ANDAMAL_1=130 ANDAMAL_10=0 ANDAMAL_1T=Bostad; Småhus friliggande ANDAMAL_2=0 ANDAMAL_3=0 ANDAMAL_4=0...
	2	2017-04-12 11:00:13 UTC	Dalkvist	He was doing some incompatible sourced imports, they have stopped now and I have emailed dwg to redact the changesets.

45413391 by mueschel	1	2017-04-11 19:52:02 UTC	Bob	Moin! Eine no_entry restriction (hier: Deine Änderung an der Relation 6848355) kann mehrere from-Mitglieder haben, so steht es im Wiki. Das gelöschte Mitglied habe ich daher wiederhergestellt. Das aufgestellte Zeichen 267 betrifft beide Richtungen.
	2	2017-04-11 20:02:08 UTC	mueschel	Auf den meisten Wiki-Seiten steht "exakt 1", auch auf der Deutschen. Nur die tschechische und englische Seite erlauben mehrere für no_entry. Ich würde die Relation vielleicht lieber verdoppeln, je eine für jeden from-Weg. Wer weiß, welcher Router damit Probleme hat.
	3	2017-04-12 10:42:00 UTC	Peilscheibe	@mueschel: Die no_entry und no_exit-restrictions wurden ja genau zu dem Zweck so definiert, das man eben nicht mehrere Relationen braucht, wo eine genügt. Wenn ein Router nicht mit mehreren from- bzw. to-ways klarkommt, darf er gerne dazulernen.
	4	2017-04-12 15:54:14 UTC	Bob	Moin zusammen! Die deutsche Wiki-Seite ist dazu leider wohl veraltet. Sie kennt die no_entry und no_exit restriction (noch) nicht. Die kamen erst 2011 hinzu und die Übersetzung hat noch keiner angepackt.

47506041 by jnavarrob33	1	2017-04-09 10:49:25 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, du hast hier eine Tags neu erfunden, die sonst nirgends verwendet werden: parking:condition:cost parking:condition:duration parking:condition:note parking:condition:user\tparking:condition:vehicle Bitte schau mal im Wiki nach den üblichen Tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w...
	2	2017-04-10 07:01:55 UTC	Frank Bielig	Die Tags gibt es teilweise schon. Leider sind viele Tags mit entweder :both:, :right: oder :left: versehen. Hier trifft aber keine dieser Varianten zu.
	3	2017-04-10 09:32:25 UTC	mueschel	"cost" -> "fee" "interval" -> "time_interval" "duration" -> "maxstay" "vehicle" und "user" gibt es nicht, das muss über condition angegeben werden wenn es Einschränkungen gibt. Die Tags gehö...
	4	2017-04-10 10:36:40 UTC	Frank Bielig	"Die Tags gehören eigentlich an die Straße selbst, ..." Das ist der eigentliche Diskussionspunkt. Bei der Wahl der Tagnamen sind wir leidenschaftslos, könnte auch immer leicht angepasst werden. Schwieriger ist der Punkt, wie die Geometrien aufgenommen werden. Wir haben u...
	5	2017-04-10 11:32:25 UTC	Ralf Bielig	"Die Tags gehören eigentlich an die Straße ..." Das sehe ich dann problematisch, wenn: * die Parkstreifen beider Straßenseiten physisch weit auseinander liegen, z.B. bei mehrspurigen Straßen. * die Parkkonditionen sich alle paar Meter ändern oder auf beiden...
	6	2017-04-10 11:48:00 UTC	mueschel	Ja, ideal ist das vorhandene Schema nicht. Ich denke, sowas sollte mal in größerer Runde diskutiert werden, z.B. im Forum mit ein paar gut ausgewählten Beispielen. Das beste Tagging nützt ja am Ende nichts, wenn es die Auswerter nicht umsetzen wollen oder können.
	7	2017-04-10 14:23:15 UTC	Nakaner	Hallo Frank, wer ist denn "wir"? Falls ihr organisiert oder mit kommerziellen Absichten in OSM editiert, solltet ihr das samt der Motivation und eurer Pläne offenlegen. Viele Grüße Michael
	8	2017-04-10 15:53:52 UTC	Frank Bielig	Hallo Michael, "uns", Kollegen mit großem Interesse an digitalen Karten und langjährige Nutzer von OSM, möchten nur helfen, ein weiteres Feature bei OSM zu etablieren, welches ein Grundübel des heutigen Straßenverkehrs in Metropolen beseitigen hilft: Parkpl&au...

47537580 by Peilscheibe	1	2017-04-10 11:00:18 UTC	mueschel	Servus, ich finde hier mehrmals "lity = sign" - sieht irgendwie nach Tippfehler aus. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-04-10 15:27:12 UTC	Peilscheibe	Autsch. Vermutlich eine Teamleistung von Autovervollständigung und schnellem Finger ;-) Danke für's finden, ist repariert.

47406436 by ti-lo	1	2017-04-04 14:34:50 UTC	mueschel	Could you please point me to the discussion page of this mechanical edit?
	2	2017-04-04 19:14:35 UTC	ti-lo	It's not mechanical, but manual
	3	2017-04-04 19:29:41 UTC	mueschel	Even then, this has to be discussed beforehand (as you were told by the DWG this afternoon). - > 600 objects edited worldwide within a single day - in the ~ 10 cases I checked, some information was lost (e.g. used bikes and new bikes sales replaced by a single 'sales' tag) - there are tags wit...
	4	2017-04-09 14:00:19 UTC	ti-lo	Sorry for the late answer, didn't get the notification somehow. - Who is DWG ? - Could you send me some examples for the "lost information" issue ? - spelling mistakes shouldn't have happened as I mostly use copy & paste for the tags, but if you find errors, I'll correct them - I c...
	5	2017-04-09 15:33:33 UTC	mueschel	DWG = Data Working Group, the guys who gave you this block: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1293 lost information - this is very hard to find, given that you retagged thousands of stores and you have to look in the history of these nodes "removing an established tagging scheme com...
	6	2017-04-09 16:55:16 UTC	ti-lo	Regarding DWG : Sent this message with explanations of my actions and was then unblocked immediately : woodpeck 4. April 2017 15:45 "well documented" is really an euphemism for the status before. - (motorcycle) "clöthes" was not defined - for "rental" there we...
	7	2017-04-10 11:54:52 UTC	DaveF	Although this entity was tagged indirectly in the first place (it should be shop not amenity), you made it worse by removing any primary tag & substituting with a sole sub-tag. Sub-tags are 'adjective' tags which help describe the details of the objects.
	8	2017-04-10 17:31:06 UTC	ti-lo	That's right, I corrected it. Pretty strange as I was sure I checked the entry when I answered ("Sorry for the late answer"). I once had an effect that a history entry disappeared (I edited an entry, later someone else edited it again, my edits were still there, but the history entry miss...
	9	2017-04-10 17:41:43 UTC	ti-lo	mea culpa, I checked the others, seems I didn't pay attention to this, correcting them now

44107478 by rashaurl	1	2016-12-04 12:26:46 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the key "atl_name" on 40 nodes - this should be "alt_name". Would you mind correcting these? Jan http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ksp
	2	2017-04-02 15:23:52 UTC	mueschel	Hi (again), this upload also contains several hundred nodes without any tags. Can these be deleted? Jan
	3	2017-04-02 16:44:56 UTC	rashaurl	Hello, You do not need to delete them, these are blanks. Thank you
	4	2017-04-08 14:44:38 UTC	mueschel	What do you mean by 'blanks'? Single nodes without tags are just useless.
	5	2017-04-10 12:18:17 UTC	rashaurl	Billet, in order to then add tags. I understandably wrote?
	6	2017-04-10 12:18:51 UTC	rashaurl	i use gogle translate))

47525153 by opengislab	1	2017-04-08 11:43:12 UTC	mueschel	Hi, all these buildings have a strange key that is not used in any other place: tipo_const=NO CONVENCIONAL What does it mean? Btw, this looks a lot like an import, could you point me to the discussion and documentation of it on the mailing list or wiki? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-05-04 15:40:48 UTC	opengislab	I tell you because those attributes are that way. This disaster happened on April 1, 2017. In Mocoa there was very little information, the task was activated in tasking manager of OSM Colombia, https://tareas.openstreetmap.co/project/50 In two days we managed to map the necessary and the result...
	3	2017-05-11 20:15:48 UTC	smaprs	Also almost all buildings have the same tags: "building:levels=7". But in fact, as can be seen in images, most buildings are houses of only 1 level (some few have 2 or 3). What happened? Was those same tags accidentallly copied/applied to all buildings?

47389735 by Christian Madsen	1	2017-04-07 19:48:22 UTC	mueschel	Hi, 'abandoned' is written 'abandoned' and not 'abandonded'. Could you have a look and correct this on >60 objects? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-04-08 16:21:45 UTC	Christian Madsen	Thank you for the feedback. Looks like JOSM has replicated a misspelling instead of the correct phrase. I will change it first opportunity I get.
	3	2017-04-13 17:46:24 UTC	Christian Madsen	There, I think got them all now. Please comment if there are anyone left.

47401978 by sbeedigital	1	2017-04-06 15:46:16 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added more than 120 buildings with the misspelled key 'buiilding'. Could you have a look and correct this? Jan

47427987 by NicoVargas	1	2017-04-04 17:18:08 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you explain the meaning of these tags? numero_pis=1 numero_sot=0 tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL tipo_domin=PRIVADO Also, it looks like the images you use are misaligned, many of the buildings are intersecting the road (which seems to be in the right place according to GPS traces) Could...
	2	2017-04-04 23:15:20 UTC	NicoVargas	Yeah, it was caused by a direct import of an area not covered by the IGAC image we were using. numero_pis=1 (# of floors ) numero_sot=0 (# of basement) tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL (i think is a building with strong materials as cement, an so) tipo_domin=PRIVADO (private) This issue maybe remai...
	3	2017-04-05 17:07:11 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I can change the numero_pis to building:levels and building:levels:underground. I don't think we have an equivalent for the other two, should I delete them?
	4	2017-04-05 17:34:30 UTC	NicoVargas	Yes please, replace it and delet it :) Many thanks
	5	2017-04-05 18:48:45 UTC	mueschel	Ok, did in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47486023

47300587 by dudone	1	2017-04-04 15:48:35 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377910114 The key 'ch]' looks like a mistake. Jan
	2	2017-04-04 19:47:24 UTC	dudone	Hi Jan Many thanks for spotting this. I have removed the tag. There was also a highway=track tag missing for the way above this which I have now added. Regards Dudley

47316160 by Christian Madsen	1	2017-04-02 15:46:12 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the name tag: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4766343316 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-04-03 07:01:24 UTC	Christian Madsen	Ops, my bad. Thanks for the feedback.

47273516 by Jakka	1	2017-04-02 15:38:06 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of this building? "Arme = Klarenstraat" http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70840140 Jan
	2	2017-04-02 17:18:00 UTC	Jakka	"Arme = Klarenstraat" deleted

47272777 by kuesa	1	2017-04-02 15:33:07 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, du benutzt hier 70x den key "generator:mode" - das sollte eigentlich "generator:method" heißen. Korrigierst du das noch? Grüße, Jan

41904458 by old wolf	1	2017-04-02 14:46:39 UTC	mueschel	Hi, in this area you created a lot (~ 1000) of nodes without any tag which don't belong to a way or relation. I guess this was a mistake and they can be deleted? E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/4311927621 Cheers, Jan

47158543 by stbg	1	2017-04-02 14:42:00 UTC	mueschel	Hi, something went wrong on some of the buildings you added: The ways are not correct, containing some nodes more than once. Could you have a look and correct these? Here is a map with error markers (Keepright): osm.mueschelsoft.de/keepright/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=48.62793&lon=38.93588...

46860931 by brianboru	1	2017-04-02 14:17:21 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I noticed some issues with this (huge) import of ~20000 trees. - The nodes have several tags which are not defined in the wiki, such as age,constituency, form, plot_number, site_name, usrn, ward - I didn't find a discussion on this import. Was it announced on the mailing list? - the 'height...
	2	2017-04-27 14:01:51 UTC	brianboru	This is now documented for discussion at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Birmingham_City_Council_trees_data following talk-gb converstions and is paused until issues are resolved

47293691 by mambilima1996	1	2017-04-01 17:17:14 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this. Jan

47335795 by johanespeter9	1	2017-04-01 17:17:09 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this. Jan
	2	2017-04-02 11:02:16 UTC	johanespeter9	thank you so much, i am still clearing data let me rectify right now

47326943 by shellyshamz	1	2017-04-01 17:17:05 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this. Jan

47289808 by elias banda	1	2017-04-01 17:17:01 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this. Jan

47289325 by clack meki	1	2017-04-01 17:16:55 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this. Jan

47292483 by mirriam mweetwa	1	2017-04-01 17:16:45 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this. Jan

47288032 by anmir	1	2017-04-01 17:14:22 UTC	mueschel	Hi, it looks like this import went wrong - there is a huge amount of foreign tags on the ways. Could you clean this up? Jan

29223639 by Romanese	1	2017-04-01 12:38:19 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, was ist denn das hier: http://osm.org/way/331073395 Eine Fußgängerbrücke? Dann sollte noch "highway=path" ergänzt werden. Gruß, Jan

45839198 by osmcontri	1	2017-04-01 12:17:44 UTC	mueschel	Wurde die von dir geänderte Kreuzung hier umgebaut? Im Augenblick stimmen die Wege nämlich nicht mehr mit Bing überein. Gruß, Jan

47271913 by anbr	1	2017-03-30 13:27:08 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, fast 60 der Gebäude haben das Tag "roof:sharp" anstelle von "roof:shape". Kannst du das noch korrigieren? Griß, Jan
	2	2017-03-30 14:26:32 UTC	anbr	Ja, den Tippfehler habe ich korrigiert ...

47273465 by vinicius fr	1	2017-03-30 13:26:00 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added 50 points with keys POINT_X and POINT_Y. I guess this was a mistake and should be deleted? Jan

46804987 by MichaH	1	2017-03-26 15:00:57 UTC	mueschel	Hallo Micha, kannst du rund um diesen Weg noch nach den Bus-Relationen und dem Spurtagging schauen? Das stimmt jetzt alles nicht mehr. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42937214 Gruß, Jan

47130829 by Tomas Straupis	1	2017-03-26 12:53:11 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added 6 ways (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337771983) with the key "ad]" - could you check and correct this? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-03-26 14:32:39 UTC	Tomas Straupis	Fixed. Thank you for noticing.

47124309 by Luis Lopes	1	2017-03-25 12:24:06 UTC	mueschel	Hi, here are 749 buildings with the tag "_building_1_=yes". Could you fix that? Cheers, Jan

47108872 by alessiofaraon	1	2017-03-25 11:46:12 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of three ways, including this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482320633 other_tags = "surface"=>"unpaved","tracktype"=>"2" specifiche =5 trekking =1 Jan

47063107 by Flutus	1	2017-03-24 08:41:15 UTC	mueschel	Hi, du nutzt hier das Tag 'night_only'. Nachtbusse werden normalerweise mit "by_night = only" getagged. Vielleicht willst du das noch anpassen? Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-03-26 20:56:50 UTC	Flutus	Ich dachte schon dass es eines geben müsste, hab aber keins gefunden. Ist geändert.

47047368 by mweper	1	2017-03-22 11:38:15 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used these tags: traffic_signals:ground = yes traffic_signals:light = yes They are not in use in any other place yet - what is their meaning? Jan
	2	2017-03-22 12:05:19 UTC	mweper	Hi @mueschel. This news talks about the tags (invented by now) that I put, since I did not know if there was a tag for that. - http://rosarionoticias.gob.ar/page/noticias/id/77308/title/Se-puso-en-funcionamiento-el-primer-semáforo-peatonal-de-piso-del-país -- I put both for the do...
	3	2017-03-22 12:22:39 UTC	mueschel	Hi, alright. I would go with the 'floor_light' version. Please add an entry to the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals Recently, a similar installation was made in the Netherlands.
	4	2017-03-26 20:06:58 UTC	mweper	Is it okay like this? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#How_to_add_a_floor_light_for_pedestrians.3F

47034848 by Syke Ntlaba	1	2017-03-22 11:29:48 UTC	mueschel	Hi, in your changesets I found a huge set of wrong tags, like these: High way = Footpath Water ways = intermediate farm land \t= farm Please have a look to the wiki how paths, rivers and buildings are tagged and use only these tags. Everything else is useless, because none of our software ca...

47035682 by Tomas Straupis	1	2017-03-21 11:54:57 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the tag 'addr:contact = yes' on many POIs. This is a new tag and not defined anywhere - what does it mean? Jan Jan
	2	2017-03-21 12:39:15 UTC	Tomas Straupis	It is a temporary tag to mark duplicate addresses until contact:* scheme is approved or at least we (Lithuanian mapping community) come to agreement that support of contact:* is good enough. For the time being f.e. iD editor does not support contact:* We need this addr:contact info for QA and later...

47021595 by GMMM	1	2017-03-21 11:05:37 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM. in your edits you used tags like '2nd floor occupant', 'other occupants' and several similar ones. These are not defined in the wiki and therefore are rather useless because none of our software can understand it. Please have a look to the wiki how POI like offices and shops hav...

46995095 by JessAk71	1	2017-03-20 13:32:12 UTC	mueschel	Hi, Could you check the spelling of tags? I found many 'buiding:levels' with a missing 'l'. Jan
	2	2017-03-21 03:59:09 UTC	JessAk71	Oops so sorry my mistake on the missing letter I will double check and fix all them next week. Thanks for letting me know.

46695163 by IceMan22	1	2017-03-20 09:38:58 UTC	mueschel	Partially reverted. Reason: features do not exist.

46755166 by IceMan22	1	2017-03-20 09:37:30 UTC	mueschel	I reverted this changeset. Reason: This is a stream, not a man_made=breakwater

46755176 by IceMan22	1	2017-03-20 09:36:26 UTC	mueschel	I reverted this changeset. Reason: This is not a park.

46950390 by Mahdi Nameghi	1	2017-03-19 15:12:25 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you have a look to the spelling of tags? E.g. I found 'electrifie' which should be 'electrified' name_fa -> name:fa full_name_ -> full_name and few more. I corrected some of them but I don't know if I catched all. Cheers, Jan

46960968 by Виик	1	2017-03-19 15:03:00 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM! Please make sure you use only keys which are described in the Wiki. If you use other keys (like ones in Russian), no software can understand it and e.g. display it on a map. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-03-20 08:35:28 UTC	opeihatebot	А смещение для спутниковых снимков кто будет устанавливать?
	3	2017-03-20 09:19:20 UTC	andygol	Я відмінив цей набір змін (див. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47006199) This changeset was reverted by me (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47006199)
	4	2017-03-20 09:34:47 UTC	andygol	Шановний Виик Зважаючи на факт, що це ваша перша спроба участі в ОСМ, пропоную вам ознайомитись з деякими статями у Вікі проекту, які допоможуть вам зробити ваші зм�...

46942022 by Carlo Folini	1	2017-03-19 14:59:06 UTC	mueschel	Hi, did you consider using the 'destination_sign' tagging for these signs? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign This makes using the data much simpler like on this sign: http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinationsign/example/#node=3908107513
	2	2017-03-19 20:58:22 UTC	Carlo Folini	Hi, no...but I definitely have to take a look into it! It seems very interesting

46961795 by Seandebasti	1	2017-03-19 14:50:49 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this node: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4741782702 hig=yes looks like a mistake Jan

46960351 by Protoxenus	1	2017-03-19 14:44:48 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, du hast hier bei einigen Tags ein '-' vorangestellt um sie zu 'deaktivieren'. Normalerweise benutzt man dafür einen der lifecycle prefixes, wie hier beschrieben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix Wahrscheinlich passt 'disused:' hier. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-03-19 15:41:39 UTC	Protoxenus	Ja, meine Intention war, das das (wahrscheinlich defekte) Molenfeuer nicht gerendert wird. Ich gehe davon aus, das es zu Saisonbeginn wieder in Betrieb geht. Ich hatte auch erst überlegt, das anders kenntlich zu machen, aber ich fand nichts passendes. "Disused" ist nach meinem Sprach...

46896925 by johanemilsson	1	2017-03-17 12:09:40 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this area doesn't have any valid tag. Could you check this? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480839466 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-03-17 14:38:12 UTC	johanemilsson	I placed the leisure tag in a relation. I should probably just remove the other tags as they are not really necessary.
	3	2017-03-18 12:49:02 UTC	mueschel	The relation is fine, but those tags should be deleted if they are not needed. Maybe you want to keep one tag with an ID to be able to match this object again with your external data source. Jan

46863578 by woodennature	1	2017-03-18 12:46:47 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the new key 'name:Zh_py' on 59 ways. the common version is 'name:zh_py', used 900 times already. Would you mind changing this? Cheers, Jan

43264448 by dan980-import	1	2016-10-30 12:57:17 UTC	mueschel	Hi, 5500 nodes have a misspelled tag "addrpostcode". Btw, are you sure that the license of your source allows use for OSM? CC BY and ODbL are not compatible! Jan
	2	2016-10-30 13:46:15 UTC	dan980-import	Hi, we got this authorization letter: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/7/77/Autorizzazione_sardegna_openstreetmap.pdf
	3	2016-10-30 13:50:19 UTC	mueschel	Alright, maybe you can add a remark on the wiki page?
	4	2016-10-30 13:51:46 UTC	dan980-import	yes, I'm gonna update it as soon as possible
	5	2016-10-30 14:01:25 UTC	sabas88	CC-BY-SA isn't compatible, CC-BY is (provided we add a proper attribution on the changeset)
	6	2017-03-17 21:38:03 UTC	mueschel	cc-by is not compatible. See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ (Doesn't affect this import, because of the explicit authorization)

46925908 by mueschel	1	2017-03-17 15:12:06 UTC	ToniE	Danke, wieder ein typo von mir?
	2	2017-03-17 19:29:53 UTC	mueschel	Aus "surfarce" habe ich "surface" gemacht - passiert nun mal beim Tippen.

46897632 by brianboru	1	2017-03-17 12:11:48 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4303618075 The tag ref`... = grid_bin doesn't look right. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-04-17 09:42:56 UTC	brianboru	Finger trouble! Thanks - corrected

46907545 by Erreyesan	1	2017-03-17 11:53:09 UTC	mueschel	Hi, the trees you add have a strange tag: "2016 = 298". I corrected some yesterday, but there are more you added today. I guess it should be "ref = 2016.298". Could you have a look and fix that? Cheers, Jan

46840668 by padvinder	1	2017-03-16 11:37:19 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480408120 The tag is wrong - and I don't know how to correct it. Looks like 'landuse = forest', but I can't see a forest here, just few individual trees. Jan

46880700 by Hausemer	1	2017-03-16 11:17:26 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added areas with strange tags that are not defined anywhere, like these: area \tyes area6 \tsubarea6 name \tsubarea6 What did you try to tag here? Some type of boundary? Please check the wiki on how to tag them properly, in the current state this data can not be interpreted by any sta...
	2	2017-03-20 19:11:49 UTC	Hausemer	Problem fixed!

46801500 by wulankhairunisa	1	2017-03-15 16:58:16 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of some of the buildings, e.g. buildingxx:floor should be floor:material building:walls should be building:material building:roof should be roof:material Those tags are described in the wiki, please check the other tags as well. Jan

46852472 by Restre	1	2017-03-15 16:15:33 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added 59 objects with the key 'bulding'. Would you mind fixing this? 'building' Cheers, Jan

46819684 by woodennature	1	2017-03-14 11:51:58 UTC	mueschel	Do these streets really have the German name as part of their official name? If not, please use name:de for the German name. Jan

46823627 by Irakli Ika	1	2017-03-14 11:34:58 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the keys "vertical height", "vertical_height", "vertical_rise" to map the height difference of aerialways. These tags are not used in any other place. Typically, start and end node of the aerialway are tagged with 'ele' to mark their respective height. \...
	2	2017-03-14 18:05:15 UTC	Irakli Ika	Ok I will use ele insted, thank you.

46823301 by Peilscheibe	1	2017-03-14 11:29:51 UTC	mueschel	Hi, den Key 'wheelchair:approachable' gibt es bis jetzt noch nicht. Ich würde da einfach "wheelchair = yes" setzen, und wenn es noch eine Einschränkung gibt mit "wheelchair:description" arbeiten. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-03-14 12:20:41 UTC	Peilscheibe	Hallo, klar gibt's den, hier zum Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4732885191 ;-) wheelchair=yes beschreibt die Benutzbarkeit eines Objekts mit dem Rollstuhl selbst, z. B. als Attribut an einem Fußgängerüberweg oder einer Toilette. Nähmen wir als Beispiel nun mal d...
	3	2017-04-23 06:35:24 UTC	JPaulW	Hey, in dem Changeset sind ein paar Änderungen von track->path und track->service die ich absolut nicht nachvollziehen kann. Könntest du mal erklären was du gegen track an den Stellen hattest? Viele Grüße
	4	2017-04-23 08:36:21 UTC	Peilscheibe	Hallo JPaulW, klar, gerne. Zunächst haben wir in der Systematik in OSM eine Unterscheidung in Wirtschaftswege für land- bzw. forstwirtschaftlichen Verkehr (track - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack), die Widmung ist regelmäßig durch Beschilderung erk...

46783977 by GuyVV	1	2017-03-14 11:17:04 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added the tag 'with' on 29 ways. It should be spelled 'width' - could you have a look and fix this? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-03-17 15:22:57 UTC	GuyVV	Hi, Bedankt voor het opmerken. Hopelijk heb ik ze nu allemaal verbeterd. Grt, Guy

46784126 by Chemist72	1	2017-03-13 21:28:43 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, "fee:no = yes" - das Tag gibt es nicht. Entweder fee=yes oder fee=no, was stimmt? Gruss, Jan
	2	2017-03-13 22:02:47 UTC	Chemist72	Hast Recht, Jan. Sorry & danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit. Ich hatte es velwechsert mit payment:none=yes. Ist korrigiert. Es kostet nichts. Ist eh noch im Bau.

46797417 by EnigmaQuip	1	2017-03-13 21:23:59 UTC	mueschel	Hi, found 3 ways with all strange tags like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480097548 Could you check & correct this? Jan
	2	2017-03-13 21:54:00 UTC	EnigmaQuip	Fixed, sorry about that

46794672 by bielebog	1	2017-03-13 21:21:34 UTC	mueschel	Hi, schau dir mal das Tagging von diesem Way an, da ist was schiefgelaufen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47435488 Gruss, Jan
	2	2017-03-13 22:03:27 UTC	bielebog	Auha, das gehört _da_ nicht rein. Das war ein Cut'n Paste-Fehler. Gut gesehen, danke.

46768171 by MacLondon	1	2017-03-13 19:14:02 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of this node? Looks weird. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4571244663 Jan
	2	2017-03-14 00:37:24 UTC	MacLondon	Thanks Jan, I have now corrected my completely mistyped entry to what I had intended to enter

46434259 by omino	1	2017-03-13 19:07:48 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used various spellings of the same key: 'physically _challenged' 'physically_challenged' 'physically_ challenged' 'physically challenged' Please, use only one spelling, otherwise the data is rather useless. Also, please use tags that are already in use and don't invent new ones. 'physi...

32075589 by rmahfuz	1	2017-03-12 15:06:12 UTC	mueschel	Hi, what are all these nodes? None of them has any tag. Could you check this and / or delete them? Cheers, Jan

46728819 by Dr Kludge	1	2017-03-12 13:01:34 UTC	mueschel	Hi, are those 'meta' tags on this building really necessary? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436232310 Cheers, Jan

46763180 by Rodolphe ANOUMOU	1	2017-03-12 12:46:10 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you uploaded 220 objects with the tag "Yess = Building". Could you correct this? 'building=yes' would be correct. Cheers, Jan

46744226 by Agnaldo Rossini	1	2017-03-12 12:36:40 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM! On this node you used some non-English keys to describe the object: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4726295753 In OSM one must use common tags as described in the Wiki - otherwise the information can not be interpreted correctly by software. Please have a look to the wiki ...

46274474 by sennewald63	1	2017-02-23 10:12:36 UTC	mueschel	Hi, habe hier gerade ein paar 'backwart' in 'backward' korrigiert. Und ein kleiner Tipp: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121635637 Die Angabe der Autobahn hier ist ein Fall für destination:ref:to und destination:symbol:to weil es sich um einen Hinweis auf eine zu erreichende, aber entfer...
	2	2017-02-24 13:03:09 UTC	sennewald63	Hallo mueschel, danke für die Berichtigung von 'backward' . Mite dem destination:ref:to und destination:symbol:to stehe ich auf Kriegsfuß, da es für mich zu unausgegoren ist. Im Proposed features/Destination details https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination...
	3	2017-02-24 18:04:32 UTC	mueschel	Hier hatte ich mal eine kleine Zusammenstellung im Wiki gemacht: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging Mein Tool ist da sicher nicht das Maß der Dinge - ich rendere einfach das, was ich für wichtig halte. Zur besseren Darstellung sind die :to nur ein kle...
	4	2017-03-10 19:10:38 UTC	sennewald63	Ich habe mir deine Erklärungen unter "User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging" nochmal rein gezogen und dabei drei Probleme gefunden. 1. Du solltest mit angeben, dass auch "destination:symbol:to*" für die Einsortierung des entsprechenden Symbols notwendig ist. 2. Die Farbe b...
	5	2017-03-11 13:55:09 UTC	mueschel	Lass uns das per Mail besprechen, ich schreibe dir gerade.

46641385 by worldwidewolford	1	2017-03-10 08:17:06 UTC	mueschel	Hi, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/253789222 There are several 'linz:' tags on thia node - was this a mistake? Jan
	2	2017-03-10 08:41:19 UTC	worldwidewolford	It looks like those tags predate my edit. I am on and have been editing on mobile, so any research you can do into those tags would be great, but they were not added by me. Cheers
	3	2017-03-10 15:55:24 UTC	mueschel	Before your edit the keys were in upper case, e.g. LINZ:layer. These are very common in NZ. You changed it to lower case - might be a software issue with OsmAnd?
	4	2017-03-10 20:31:14 UTC	worldwidewolford	Oh wow. This must be an issue with OsmAnd. I will send a bug report about that. Could you fix those tags for me? Thanks for picking that up.
	5	2017-03-11 13:41:59 UTC	mueschel	Changed the tags back.

46670780 by Eyzi	1	2017-03-11 13:37:26 UTC	mueschel	Hi, it looks like you added many buildings with the tag "addr:pro" which should be "addr:province". Could you have a look and fix that? Cheers, Jan http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nqy

46720785 by stevea	1	2017-03-10 09:27:28 UTC	mueschel	Hi, You uploaded a huge sset of objects, which are mainly tagged with foreign tags which most likely should not appear in Osm. Could you check and correct this? Jan Examples: ACCESS_TYP=Open Access ACRES=48.743 AGNCY_ID=1328 AGNCY_LEV=City AGNCY_NAME=Scotts Valley, City...
	2	2017-03-10 17:34:49 UTC	stevea	I wouldn't say "huge" as it is a few dozen edits over the course of a few hours in a single day (and I'm not done yet) against the over 12,000 edits I have entered over the last eight years. Is your problem with "foreign tags?" I kept these in to distinguish these CPAD polygo...
	3	2017-03-10 17:56:39 UTC	mueschel	I didn't complain about the import of the polygons as such. That's fine if it is done carefully. I'd suggest to keep one ref tag only, like ref:CPAD. This should be sufficient to allow for future updates. Other tags like ACRES and COUNTY are just redundant because they can easily be retrieved f...
	4	2017-03-10 18:06:41 UTC	stevea	Thank you for your quick reply. I can certainly endeavor to reduce and/or conflate tags on future CPAD polygon entries, as I do agree that they do contain a large amount of metadata. Some is useful and some is not (to OSM) and as long as a polygon in OSM can be identified as mapping back to a uniq...

46359468 by ПЧ 26	1	2017-03-10 09:35:31 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I saw several keys with spaces in your edits. Please check the spelling of keys. Examples: 'fire operator' -> 'fire_operator' 'water tank: street' -> 'water_tank:street' (and several more) Jan

46591915 by igitov	1	2017-03-10 09:29:41 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used some new landcover tags in your edits to specify density and age. I think it would be a good idea to describe these tags in the wiki by writing a proposal for them. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-03-10 14:15:16 UTC	igitov	Hi, thanks for comment. These landcover tags are still "raw", not final. In the Russian-speaking OSM-community there is a discussion on the scheme for tagging landscapes (woodlands, shrubs, etc.). Much can change. Writing proposal still premature.

46729609 by seline1	1	2017-03-10 09:23:44 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you uploaded almost 100 nodes with a spelling mistake: 'toilest' instead of 'toilets' - could you have a look an fix this? Cheers, Jan

46701537 by OCVAS - R&DC	1	2017-03-10 09:22:06 UTC	mueschel	Hi, You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all! Jan

46702024 by imeeperezveedor	1	2017-03-10 09:21:26 UTC	mueschel	Hi, You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all! Jan

46726084 by Brad-M	1	2017-03-10 09:20:45 UTC	mueschel	Hi, You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all! Jan

46701990 by dunah	1	2017-03-10 09:20:17 UTC	mueschel	Hi, You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all! Jan

46701874 by Heneral-Hulab	1	2017-03-10 09:19:45 UTC	mueschel	Hi, You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all! Jan

46701024 by Pranses	1	2017-03-10 09:19:29 UTC	mueschel	Hi, You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all! Jan

46660024 by Carlosestrao	1	2017-03-09 08:57:47 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this node doesn't seem to be tagged right. Could you putsome common tags there? Jan

46631859 by LogicalViolinist	1	2017-03-08 08:58:24 UTC	mueschel	Hi, There are several ways with a lot of strange tags here, like 'gdforderen'. Could you check and fix this? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-03-08 10:57:18 UTC	LogicalViolinist	Do you have a way id? I might have missed deleting the garbage from geobase/toporama if not I can try to look for it
	3	2017-03-08 12:42:52 UTC	LogicalViolinist	Think I found it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478904955 I'll fix it up
	4	2017-03-08 14:06:15 UTC	mueschel	Here is a link to overpass turbo: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nlu 3 ways left. Thanks for taking care! Jan
	5	2017-03-08 14:43:59 UTC	LogicalViolinist	shouldn't be any left, thanks for the heads up :)

46580739 by KeineHeimat	1	2017-03-07 13:17:03 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, Ich habe hier öfters das Tag "parking:conditions" gefunden - das gibt es sonst nirgends. Du meinst sicher "access=...". Schaust du da nochmal drüber? Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-03-07 14:55:21 UTC	KeineHeimat	Hallo, ich habe das feature hier gelesen: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking:lane#Definieren_der_Parkplatznutzung Gruß, Jan
	3	2017-03-07 15:15:54 UTC	mueschel	Dieses Tag wird für Parkstreifen entlang von Straßen verwendet, nicht für Parkplätze. Mir ist es deswegen aufgefallen, weil du "conditions" mit "s" schriebst.
	4	2017-03-07 19:15:22 UTC	KeineHeimat	Upps, ändere ich die Tage - bin im Moment unterwegs! Gruß Jan

46512881 by nyuriks	1	2017-03-07 09:23:15 UTC	mueschel	Please don't change the established wikipedia tag to things like described-in-wikipedia described_in_wikipedia listed_in_wikipedia listed-in-wikipedia and so on. Such changes have to be discussed first. Jan
	2	2017-03-07 14:20:17 UTC	nyuriks	Hi, you are right that they need to be more organized. I made a proposal for it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikipedia_tag_types Also, thanks to wikidata, we can clean up wikipedia tags now (almost 2,000 already done): https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Yurik/OSM_wiki_t...

41511755 by Fischkopp0815	1	2016-08-19 12:51:08 UTC	mueschel	Hi, der Key "healthcare_speciality" gibt es sonst nicht, das sollte "health_specialty:XYZ" heißen. Siehe http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/health_specialty#similar Gruß, Jan
	2	2016-08-19 17:43:57 UTC	Fischkopp0815	Danke, ich habe es korrigiert
	3	2017-03-05 19:08:06 UTC	highflyer74	Moin Ihr zwei! Genau genommen muß es nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare getaggt werden. Also healthcare:speciality=* Gruss aus HB!
	4	2017-03-05 19:18:47 UTC	mueschel	Das ist ein "konkurrierendes" Tagging Schema. Beide sind ähnlich oft in Verwendung (etwa 11000 zu 7000) und beide sind im Wiki dokumentiert (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0/Specialties ) U.a. erlaubt es eine feinere Abstufung und einfacheres Taggen...
	5	2017-03-06 05:48:10 UTC	highflyer74	Moin Jan! Ja, richtig. Ich erinnere mich gerade wieder, das wir das Thema beim Bremer Treffen erörtert hatten, uns dann aber für das andere entschieden haben, da das von Dir angesprochene nie über den Proposal Status hinauskam. Eigentlich eine unhaltbare Situation für ein nicht g...

46398492 by ptal_io	1	2017-02-26 12:44:39 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you imported a lot of points with elevation data in this changeset. Please note that the tagging is wrong and because of that these points can not be used in OSM. Elevations are tagged using the 'ele' key. Sources should be given in the changeset source tag, but not individually on each of th...
	2	2017-02-26 15:12:54 UTC	ptal_io	Thank you for the comment. I have removed the erroneous tags and added ele tags as well as source information to the changeset commit.
	3	2017-03-05 15:48:21 UTC	mueschel	All the wrong tags are still there and have not been deleted.
	4	2017-03-05 17:20:18 UTC	ptal_io	Apologies. This has been rectified in changeset 46600439

46550465 by SergioTraverssi	1	2017-03-05 15:43:56 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you essentially flooded a huge area by adding landuse=basin to large polygons. Also, most of the tags are from a foreign source and do not belong into the OSM database: NUNIVOTTO6=843131 NUNIVOTTO7=8431311 Shape_Area=2.42385595961E8 Shape_Leng=79016.1029871 surface=2423...

46498015 by Louis495	1	2017-03-05 15:34:23 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM! Please pay a bit of attention to the spelling of keys - I found various versions of the word "wheelchair" in your edits. With spelling mistakes these tags can not be understood by any software. Cheers, Jan

46520819 by de vries	1	2017-03-05 13:31:59 UTC	mueschel	Hi, 17 of the nodes have the strange key "\|ODS:nevenadres" - could you check that? Pipes in keys are not common. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-03-05 18:01:37 UTC	de vries	Yes I know, I'll fix it. I postponed fixing it for debug reasons .

46498582 by FvGordon	1	2017-03-05 12:50:52 UTC	mueschel	Hi, the tag on this way - was it a mistake? Cheers, Jan http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477789206
	2	2017-03-05 12:55:27 UTC	FvGordon	Please ask the creator of version 1. Greetings, Franz
	3	2017-03-05 13:15:41 UTC	mueschel	Sorry, I didn't see this changeset - but thanks to his changeset comment it is clear it should be 'source'.

42620053 by greecemapper	1	2016-10-05 07:52:28 UTC	Athalis	Hallo greecemapper, woher stammen denn die ganzen name Tags? Sicherlich nicht von Bing ;) Kannst du noch eine Quelle angeben (hier im Changeset Kommentar sollte reichen) damit das in Zukunft noch nachvollziehbar ist?
	2	2017-03-05 12:44:19 UTC	mueschel	Sieht für mich so aus als sollten zumindest die Flurnamen revertiert werden solange die Legalität der Quelle nicht klar ist.

46449195 by Mr BA Demba	1	2017-03-03 20:50:57 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the key 'Q' quite often in this changeset, what is it supposed to mean? Could you check and correct this? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-03-04 14:25:12 UTC	Mr BA Demba	corrigé

46431677 by Meredith Rider	1	2017-03-03 20:44:42 UTC	mueschel	Hi, Here are five ways with the tag "tt=both" - could you correct this? Jan
	2	2017-03-03 22:22:56 UTC	Meredith Rider	Thanks for catching that. I'll get it fixed! Meredith

46427210 by malottki	1	2017-03-02 11:49:32 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, kannst du diesen Node checken? "Düne = Düne" ist kein sinnvoll definiertes Tag. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4707353849 Gruß, Jan

46427500 by Thunder08	1	2017-03-02 11:47:18 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of this house? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287233238 The street name looks wrong and there is another tag that looks like a mistake. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-03-02 12:23:09 UTC	Thunder08	Thank you! I fixed it.

46421702 by modea	1	2017-03-02 11:45:18 UTC	mueschel	Hallo modea, willkommen bei OSM! Du hast hier Hydranten eingetragen. Überlicherweise werden solche Objekte nur als Punkt und nicht als Linie eingetragen. Das Tag "hydrant=yes" wird leider von keiner Software verstanden. Schau mal im Wiki nach, dort ist erklärt wie Hydranten get...
	2	2017-03-04 08:59:50 UTC	anesthesia	Halo modea, du hast Gebäude doppelt (zb Hausnummer 33, 77 und 78) sowie Linien (ways) und Punkte (Nodes) ohne Tags erfasst. Die Kapelle ist nun 3x vorhanden: einmal von mir; einmal von dir mit Tag und einmal ohne. Güße,
	3	2017-03-04 09:06:04 UTC	anesthesia	PS: du verwendest eine Uuuuuralte JOSM Version. die ist schon sechs Jahre alt. Eine aktuelle Version gibt es hier: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Download

46411547 by kphklaus	1	2017-03-02 11:40:04 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, kannst du diesen Hydranten nochmal überprüfen? "fire_pressure" ist kein sinnvolles Tag. Außerdem werden Kommazahlen wie im Englischen mit Punkt geschrieben. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-03-02 13:40:12 UTC	kphklaus	doofer Fehler, habe ich korrigiert. viele Grüße kph

46426527 by Euro Région Aquitaine Euskadi	1	2017-03-02 11:36:25 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this edit? You added a bus route that consists of a parking lot only. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7013865 Cheers, Jan

46415784 by FredrikLindseth	1	2017-03-02 11:33:28 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this area? Looks like something went wrong with the name tag. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317391337 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-03-02 13:37:05 UTC	FredrikLindseth	Ah, a typo. I fixed it now :-)

46421069 by bezin	1	2017-03-02 11:31:56 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, der Key "recycling:opening_hours" wird außer hier nirgends verwendet. Üblicherweise wird "opening_hours" ohne Prefix verwendet. Würdest du das anpassen? Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-03-02 12:10:19 UTC	bezin	Hi, ja, völlig richtig. Da hab ich gepennt. Passe ich an – auch für die Änderungen in Überruhr-Holthausen.
	3	2017-03-03 08:31:52 UTC	bezin	Gilt entsprechend auch für recycling:operator, der so nicht existiert, sondern auch ohne Prefix verwendet wird. Auch das passe ich an.

46362156 by ПЧ 26	1	2017-03-01 11:30:06 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the spelling of keys in your latest changesets? E.g. I saw water tank :housenumber water tank: housenumber water tank:street There should be no spaces in the key and 'water_tank' has an underscore. Cheers, Jan

46371733 by Jake Strine	1	2017-03-01 11:26:54 UTC	mueschel	HI, could you check the tagging of some of these objects? They have russian keys only and no common keys used in other places in OSM. Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476958046 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-03-03 01:02:50 UTC	Jake Strine	Yes, it's a mistake. Fixed.

46334583 by mentor2002	1	2017-03-01 11:24:51 UTC	mueschel	Hi, kannst du hier mal nach dem Tagging schauen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4701196968 Da steht " 7710052 = underground" Gruss, Jan
	2	2017-03-01 12:08:47 UTC	mentor2002	Sorry, danke für den Hinweis... das hat sich der Copy - Paste Fehlerteufel eingeschlichen.

46465811 by mueschel	1	2017-02-28 15:13:35 UTC	muralito	Would'nt it be better to use tag "rooms" instead of "number_of_apartments"?
	2	2017-02-28 15:20:24 UTC	mueschel	I just corrected the obvious spelling mistake in the key. 'number_of_apartments' is already used 1800 times, so I consider it a valid tag. I don't know if there are cases where someone distinguished between number of rooms and number of apartments on a single object.

46338725 by malta-dinger	1	2017-02-28 11:57:01 UTC	mueschel	Hi, if you want to tag names in foreign languages: The language has to be given as ISO-639 code, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cree_language has the code 'cr' and Innu has 'moe'. Cheers, Jan

46331022 by Shubh Gems	1	2017-02-28 11:50:52 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM. Most of the tags you put on this node are rather useless, because they don't follow established tagging styles. Please have a look to the Wiki, e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features. There is a list of common tags. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-28 15:10:59 UTC	muralito	And/Or maybe ask for help to the Iocal community. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India

46342075 by marina_drion	1	2017-02-28 11:47:12 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this node? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2699648841 It has two contradicting tacticle_paving tags. Cheers, Jan

46301288 by Marly-le-Roi	1	2017-02-28 11:41:12 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I would like to point you to this Wiki page that describes how charging stations for electric cars can be tagged: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station Cheers, Jan

45313877 by georic76	1	2017-01-20 11:42:58 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found many foreign tags on 133 roads in your changesets, like these: Cod_via=20478 Cod_viaOld=0 DUG=VIA Etichetta=VIA PEZZALUNGA ISTAT=63001.0 Lunghezza=130.94 Toponimo=PEZZALUNGA Tratto=15 f_node=1346 They all look like they do not belong into the OSM database and were added by m...
	2	2017-02-27 20:13:39 UTC	mueschel	I think that this changeset has to be reverted - we can not make sure that the license of this data is compatible with ODbL if you don't disclose your source.

46283787 by ff5722	1	2017-02-27 11:52:16 UTC	mueschel	Hi, what is the meaning of the tag "hiter=ter" you put on several ways here? Jan
	2	2017-02-27 12:44:47 UTC	ff5722	That should be highway=tertiary I sometimes make typos and JOSM keeps suggesting those until restart. I will correct it asap.

46264239 by lorandr_telenav	1	2017-02-27 11:50:53 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you managed to get three spelling mistakes in this turn restriction: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6997873 Actually, you don't need this relation, it is better to add access tags to the short service way. E.g. access=emergency.

46278261 by bugiwugidancer	1	2017-02-27 11:48:18 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this way got two distance tags, one is misspelled. Could you check which one is right? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3115311666 If there are two values given, you can add them to the same tag, separated by ';' Jan

46289391 by pacopac	1	2017-02-27 11:46:46 UTC	mueschel	Hi, all the objects have the tag "Horta = Vella" - was this a mistake? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-27 21:57:21 UTC	pacopac	Corrected! Was a mistake. Thanks for pay attention

46285364 by bibi6	1	2017-02-27 11:44:25 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used highway=project here - this tag is not used often. There are other values that are defined in the wiki, maybe you can change the tagging to one of these? planned proposed preproposed construction Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-27 13:27:43 UTC	bibi6	Hi, I'm going to change these to "planned". Thanks ;)
	3	2017-02-27 13:34:49 UTC	bibi6	... I actually decided to use "proposed", as the way may change - but it will probably not. Wait and see ^^

46239859 by OF0	1	2017-02-26 13:08:47 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, kannst du hier nach dem Namen schauen? Da scheint etwas beim Tagging schiefgegangen zu sein. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38805790 Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-02-26 17:21:45 UTC	OF0	Ja, da war was schiefgegangen. Muss name=Schönertsee heißen. Habe es korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis.

46221259 by indigomc	1	2017-02-25 12:38:15 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this way? http://osm.org/way/30833729 Something went wrong with the name tag. Cheers, Jan

46193990 by sfrank	1	2017-02-23 11:35:23 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the keys railway:date_start and :date_end. The usual key for this is railway:start_date and :end_date. Could you have a look and correct this? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-26 16:20:44 UTC	sfrank	Hi, I fixed it. Was accidently used, because first I used date:start and date:end. Frank

46166360 by giorosel	1	2017-02-23 11:23:38 UTC	mueschel	Hi, these 62 buildings have a spelling mistake in the tags: 'add:province' instead of 'addr:province'. Could you have a look and fix this? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-24 15:26:08 UTC	giorosel	Hi jan, thanks for checking, i've already fixed it

46297946 by Bgabor	1	2017-02-23 09:46:38 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this changeset generated a lot of objects with a huge number of tags that are not documented and seem to have been added by mistake during this import. Jan
	2	2017-02-23 09:57:41 UTC	Bgabor	Hi, All 4000 points a certain water sources in the area and all attached attribute is important.
	3	2017-02-23 10:02:50 UTC	mueschel	If this information is important, I suggest to use common tags that can be parsed by existing software. Btw, I don't see a connection to hotosm project 2525 you mention in the changeset comment. Has this import of data been discussed on the appropriate mailing list? Is this data really 'open'? The...
	4	2017-02-26 19:48:11 UTC	edvac	Hi: If this is an import and haven't been discussed, it should be reverted inmediatly. Imports have to be discussed with the local community and with the imports list, and should be documented and the source compatible with the ODbL.
	5	2017-02-28 15:03:58 UTC	muralito	No doubt it is an import. It should be reverted, or at least discussed, fixed and the resulting new tags documented.
	6	2017-03-03 01:14:37 UTC	edvac	This import has been reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46535966 Please, read and follow the imports guidelines (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) before doing any import. Imports have to be documented, been given ODbL compatible permission by the copyright owners...
	7	2017-03-07 23:31:18 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hello Bgabor, Just to echo what has been said above - if you want to import data please do read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and follow the links from it. If you've got any questions you can either mail the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org or ask on the "imports"...
	8	2017-03-08 10:29:54 UTC	Bgabor	Hi, I will send a letter for the National Bureau of Statistics to Tanzania, and ask them to clarify the licenses for all data from http://opendata.go.tz/ website. PS: thank you for your efforts... Gabor
	9	2017-03-08 12:05:29 UTC	muralito	Hello Bgabor: If the terms & conditions are the same as stated in http://opendata.go.tz/en/pages/kanuni-na-masharti , I'm not sure if the d) paragraph is compatible with ODbL. Maybe in this case we need explicit permission from the owner to import their data into OSM.
	10	2017-03-08 12:39:44 UTC	SomeoneElse	@Bgabor, I'd suggest having this discussion on the "imports" list - there people will be able to advise you about licenses. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-February/004819.html for where this import was first mentioned there. Best Regards, Andy

46134279 by 52ПСЧ	1	2017-02-22 11:24:35 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of this fire station? There seems to be some typing error I can't fix. Cheers, Jan

46136965 by soemisch	1	2017-02-21 12:15:15 UTC	mueschel	http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475067209 parking:lane:right:vertical = yes Wirklich vertikal?
	2	2017-02-22 11:29:32 UTC	soemisch	Mueschel, danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe den Datensatz in "perpendicular" korrigiert. Viele Grüße, Lars

46222345 by TravisTRL	1	2017-02-21 10:15:51 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added several buildings on top of already existing ones. Could you have a look and correct these mistakes? Additionally, all tags you added have no meaning in OSM - only well-defined tags as described in the Wiki can be used. Examples: Capacity \t=80 Condition \t=average Levels \t=1 Pu...

36178940 by importer2015	1	2017-02-18 18:04:18 UTC	mueschel	Hi, from this changeset there are still hundreds or thousand untagged and unconnected nodes in the database. As they are completely useless - could you take some time to clean this up? Let me / the community now if you have trouble or need help! Jan
	2	2017-02-20 13:41:05 UTC	Ivan Garcia	Could you send me the link of some ofthe unconnected nodes? I will take a look at it. thks for the alert.
	3	2017-02-20 13:50:27 UTC	mueschel	Here is a link to Keepright tool - this link just shows this type of unconnected node - you have to move the map to see more errors, only ~300 are shown at a time. Actually, they seem to be from different changesets, but all by 'importer2015'. http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/keepright/report_map.php?z...
	4	2017-02-20 14:07:36 UTC	Ivan Garcia	You are right. I will have time from next week to remove those.
	5	2017-03-04 22:34:45 UTC	Ivan Garcia	All orphan nodes cleaned.

46101478 by mahmood99	1	2017-02-19 09:33:04 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM! In your edits I saw some keys that contain non-english keys. All keys should be in English only and use the well-defined names described in the wiki. Here is a list of these objects - could you have a look and correct them? http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/mPE Let me know if you...

46156748 by moulibois	1	2017-02-19 08:56:11 UTC	mueschel	Hi welcome to OSM. You put many tags on the objects you added - but unfortunately they can't be used by any OSM based software. Most of the keys you used are not well-defined and are not understood by other users. Please have a look at the wiki to find out how e.g. buildings are commonly tagged. \...

45683519 by Ms Kiara	1	2017-02-18 18:08:47 UTC	mueschel	Hi, it looks like you un-deleted a large number of nodes in this changeset, like http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3509954079/history These nodes seem to be useless now. Could you have a look and remove them again? Let me / the community know if you need help! Jan

44973673 by mtbbiker99	1	2017-01-09 10:04:57 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, no exit schreibt sich no_exit. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-01-14 08:05:10 UTC	mtbbiker99	Hallo, danke für den Hinweis. Geht so auch: noexit ? Gruß Oliver.
	3	2017-02-17 12:12:47 UTC	mueschel	Ja natürlich. noexit ist korrekt, ich weiß gar nicht mehr warum sich da ein _ in meinen Kommentar eingeschlichen hat. Sorry für die späte Antwort, habe ich übersehen!

46151191 by luepi4	1	2017-02-17 12:11:18 UTC	mueschel	Kannst du hier mal drüberschauen? An vielen Objekten hängt jetzt eine Mailadresse als Tag (teilweise mehrfach) Gruß, Jan

46133155 by krystel94	1	2017-02-17 11:58:48 UTC	mueschel	You (again) added many useless tags on buildings, e.g. here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363504576 You removed the valid tags and put new ones. All of these are useless for OSM because they don't follow normal tagging rules. Jan

46085689 by mahmood99	1	2017-02-16 21:29:47 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of your edits? In OSM, the Keys must be well defined, like "name=". For example you wrote زمین والیبالname=زمین والیبال روستا this should be: name=زمین والیبال روستا And several other, similar ones. Could you f...

46088216 by れぷしこちん	1	2017-02-16 21:26:35 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found the key "bycycle" 20 times in these edits. Could you fix the spelling - "bicycle"? Cheers, Jan

46042899 by wmyrda	1	2017-02-16 21:09:43 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this node has the tag "Stupava = Svätý Jur" which looks like a mistake. Could you check that? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/530544357 Jan
	2	2017-02-17 08:26:48 UTC	wmyrda	Hi, It is indeed. Not sure what I meant there, but probably just a copy&paste error when I wanted to add "name:pl=Svätý Jur" just like the name in polish Wikipedia is. I'll fix that one to it.

46052810 by Weltstaat	1	2017-02-16 21:08:09 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, schau mal nach dieser Plattform, da hat das Tagging Tippfehler: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261111877 Gruss, Jan
	2	2017-02-16 21:12:00 UTC	Weltstaat	allerdings! Danke, habs ausgebessert. Grüsse, Jonathan

46112749 by holzheizer	1	2017-02-16 21:02:55 UTC	mueschel	Hi, hier hast du den Key "Dorfkirche" verwendet - sollte das ein name-Tag werden? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326815203

46106364 by holzheizer	1	2017-02-16 21:02:25 UTC	mueschel	Hi, hier hast du den Key "Dorfkirche" verwendet - sollte das ein name-Tag werden? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326815203

46109913 by Netzwolf	1	2017-02-16 21:01:11 UTC	mueschel	Hi, am Node 73580256 hängt ein komisches Tag: Burgkapelle = Burgwiese Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-02-16 21:29:27 UTC	Netzwolf	Copy+Paste & v(Finger)>v(Hirn) → Unfug Ist getilgt. Danke für den Hinweis. Mehr Spaß mit Attributen gibt's täglich frisch hier: http://geo.netzwolf.info/csv/bad_attributes_k_eq_v.csv.bz2 http://geo.netzwolf.info/csv/bad_attributes_k_norm.csv.bz2 http://geo.netzwolf...

46023957 by stroet43	1	2017-02-16 12:49:21 UTC	mueschel	Could you check the tagging? "Gegevens =Binnenwegplein" looks like a mistake. Jan

46032089 by Hendrikklaas	1	2017-02-16 12:39:57 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this node got the key "no_end". Did you mean no_exit? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4682479131 Cheers, Jan

46109547 by loumoi	1	2017-02-16 11:49:41 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added many buildings with the tag "building=yes=house" - could you fix that? "building = house" would be correct. Jan

46079111 by Sheila Job	1	2017-02-15 08:47:36 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you uploaded some buildings with a missing building=yes tag. Also, there are some with two building:levels tags, one is misspelled. Could you have a look and fix these issues? Jan

46048646 by luisgustavo1968	1	2017-02-14 21:30:45 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please watch out for the correct spelling of tags, e.g. "destinarion = Ponta Grossa, Retorno" I found several times a spelling mistake in 'destination' or ':lanes' - I corrected them where I found them. Secondly, the normal separator between destinations is a ';', not a comma. Ch...

46000056 by mweper	1	2017-02-14 21:02:46 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found keys like "destination:lanes:ref" in your edits. The correct order is "destination:ref:lanes" - :lanes comes at the end. I fixed that for you. Here is a generic string to show the order for all those suffixes: key[:subkey][:hgv\|:bicycle\|...][:lanes][:forward\|:bac...
	2	2017-02-16 12:23:38 UTC	mweper	Oops. Thanks for notifying me and fix it. I did not realize.

46076026 by Iara Machiana	1	2017-02-14 19:00:46 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you tagged 90 buildings with "building:levell=1" - could you correct the spelling mistake ('levels' instead of 'levell' )? Cheers, Jan

46049514 by Abduly Anza	1	2017-02-14 18:59:53 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you tagged 20 buildings with "building;material=cement_block" - could you correct the spelling mistake (';' instead of ':' )? Cheers, Jan

46045282 by shirasayu	1	2017-02-14 18:56:52 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the tag "AlYf=Recordings" on many nodes. This tag is not used in any other place. I don't know what it means. Could you check if there is another way to tag this? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-21 16:29:11 UTC	shirasayu	Corrected

45974473 by alexhyd18	1	2017-02-13 11:42:58 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put the tag "tire=yes" on this building: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370563749 It looks like spelling mistake, could you check that? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-13 19:09:22 UTC	alexhyd18	Hello. Thanks for attention. If it looks like mistake, then what I must write to indicate the presence of tire correctly?
	3	2017-02-13 19:12:52 UTC	mueschel	Can you describe what it is? A shop where you can buy tires? That would be shop = tyres https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtyres
	4	2017-02-13 19:17:51 UTC	alexhyd18	It's a place where where anyone can make a mountage of tires
	5	2017-02-13 19:32:59 UTC	mueschel	Ok, now I got it. I would tag it as: shop = car_repair (Even if it is not a shop - to give the category of the object) service = tyres self_service = yes fee = no / yes description = (describe it in your own words, Russian is fine) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dcar

45982325 by gezginrocker	1	2017-02-13 11:48:51 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this object? http://osm.org/way/473866994 The tag doesn't look right: Mahall Türkerler=government

45970602 by Pavel_TCH	1	2017-02-13 11:38:42 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put a non-standard tag in Russian language on this node. Unfortunately this doesn't help OSM, because software can only understand well-defined tags. Could you have a look to the OSM wiki to find a better suited tag for this? man_made=pier could be one of them.
	2	2017-02-14 14:47:14 UTC	Pavel_TCH	Thank you for your note

45957836 by Agustin Robaina Iglesias	1	2017-02-13 11:32:00 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM! You put the tag "clinica = yes" on this building: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402795000 Unfortunately, this is not really useful, because the tag is not well-defined and no software can understand it. Please have a look to the wiki how hospitals need to be ma...

44715409 by hca	1	2017-02-12 13:47:16 UTC	mueschel	Hi, kannst du hier nochmal nach dem Kreisel schauen? Der ist irgendwie zweispurig getaggt. Und ist das wirklich so gedacht, dass die Straße im Norden nicht angeschlossen ist? http://osm.org/way/321022076 Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-02-12 21:44:18 UTC	hca	Hej! Die lanes waren ein Überbleibsel des früheren Straßenverlaufs (vor dem Bau des Kreisels), das ich vergessen hatte. Habe ich entfernt -- danke für den Hinweis! Was mit der Straße im Norden -- Hünfelder Straße -- werden soll, weiß ich auch nicht. Als...

45970825 by jagdpächter	1	2017-02-12 13:10:40 UTC	mueschel	"Privatweg", "Seltsame Kirr-Konstruktion", "Jagdfläche"... das sind alles keine Namen von Objekten.

45977821 by inah_telenav	1	2017-02-11 12:33:55 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the tag "destination:tag" that is not used in any other place. Could you explain the meaning or find another common tag? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-13 09:35:12 UTC	inah_telenav	Hi Sorry I missed understood, I was suppose to put destination:street. I uploaded the reviewed version.

45912084 by rupu	1	2017-02-11 12:27:26 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM. You created many objects without any tag describing what it is. Could you review these changes and add tags like those described in the Wiki? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org Cheers, Jan

45940059 by Bablu Zzaman	1	2017-02-11 12:25:55 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM. You created many objects without any tag describing what it is. Could you review these changes and add tags like those described in the Wiki? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org Cheers, Jan

45924698 by narvaezavalos	1	2017-02-10 11:52:35 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found many POIs with tags like these: Categoria=B Denominaci=peluqueria manicura spa Nombre=STAR COIFFURE Numero=3 Tipo=CYS These are rather useless because the tagging does not follow the established schemes. They can't appear on any map unless you use normal tags...

45934350 by ITOybbag	1	2017-02-09 12:08:10 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please trace buildings a bit more carefully - there are no buildings here of the size and shape you draw them. Most of the actual buildings were already mapped by others. I reverted your changeset to clean this up. Jan

45911274 by Petr1868	1	2017-02-09 11:51:50 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this relation? The tag "tt = no" looks like a mistake. http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/969201 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-09 12:11:24 UTC	Petr1868	opraveno

45918224 by LucFreitas	1	2017-02-09 11:45:36 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put the tag "crown_type: = I" on ~13 trees. Could you correct this mistake (there is no ':' in the key?
	2	2017-02-09 12:54:52 UTC	LucFreitas	Thanks. Fixed in changeset 45946425.

45431514 by mueschel	1	2017-02-08 15:13:28 UTC	rskedgell	I can find a reference for xxx:inscription_date=* in the wiki, when used in combination with heritage=* and heritage_operator=xxx, where xxx is the abbreviation for the operator, in this case he for Historic England - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage#Tags_to_use_in_combination ...
	2	2017-02-08 15:31:07 UTC	mueschel	Oh, you're right. To me this looked like the typical mistake when autocompletion failed. On the same POIs you used heritage:* as well, so this made it rather plausible. "heritage:operator" and "heritage:inscription_date" formed a nice group of tags and made a lot of sense. I...
	3	2017-02-08 19:48:13 UTC	mueschel	Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45928032

45862844 by rskedgell	1	2017-02-08 12:01:24 UTC	mueschel	Hi, in the last weeks I found this tag rather often: he:inscription_date I think it should be heritage:inscription_date Could it be a copy and paste problem? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-08 15:31:48 UTC	rskedgell	The "Tags to use in combination" table in the wiki article for the key heritage at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage#Tags_to_use_in_combination has: heritage:operator=\txxx\tsee table under abbreviation and xxx:inscription_date=\t\tDate when the object was added to the ...
	3	2017-02-08 15:32:34 UTC	mueschel	For the records: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45431514 he:inscription_date is correct.
	4	2017-02-08 15:52:36 UTC	rskedgell	Thanks - it's perhaps not the most obvious tagging scheme and probably did look a lot like a typo.

45879736 by Олег Самуйлов	1	2017-02-08 11:39:35 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the key "Village tract" on many objects - this is not a defined tag in OSM. What is its purpose? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-08 12:32:26 UTC	Олег Самуйлов	Hi, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Village_tract Cheers
	3	2017-02-08 14:55:47 UTC	mueschel	Ah, I see. The key you used doesn't fit well into the usual tagging schemes. What is used quite often are keys like is_in:township or is_in:ward I didn't find some established tagging of village tracts right now. So, I would suggest for your purpose: is_in:tract or is_in:villagetract ...

45834798 by Glipglob	1	2017-02-08 12:06:33 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please update your maps.me app. Yours has a bug and adds a wrong tag: "banner_url = https://is.gd/UoIIyn"

45852180 by LOLODUTRI	1	2017-02-08 11:56:26 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the tag recycling:Emballages =yes - tags should always be in English. An often used key is recycling:plastic_packaging Does it fit? Jan

45830634 by mueschel	1	2017-02-07 22:56:02 UTC	Fortepc	There was no reason to remove those tags. They were accurate information relevant to the POIs they were attached to.
	2	2017-02-08 11:49:11 UTC	mueschel	see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45848069 OSM is not a map of non-existing graphics in some game.
	3	2017-02-08 17:27:39 UTC	Fortepc	I was not mapping ingame graphics. I was tagging real world objects referencing that they also exist in the ARG. It's just as relevant as referencing their facebook pages that you didn't remove.

45848069 by Fortepc	1	2017-02-06 11:35:47 UTC	mueschel	Please stop adding ingress and pokemon features. OSM does not contain such ficitional objects.
	2	2017-02-07 22:52:17 UTC	Fortepc	@Mueschel you're suggesting OSM doesn't contain Freedom Park? you're sorely mistaken. Sorry for the confusion but my changeset updated the accuracy of the park on the ground, as well as added relevant information in the tags. Thanks for your concern, but try again next time with that high horse ...
	3	2017-02-08 11:42:34 UTC	mueschel	Is Freedom Park fictional? Can I see it when walking there? So yes, it should be in OSM. Can I see Pokemons when I walk there? No, they are just existing in a software on your mobile phone. Thanks for not insulting other mappers.
	4	2017-02-08 17:27:04 UTC	Fortepc	I was not mapping "Pokemons" I was tagging the park as also being represented in the Augmented Space, the same as you'd tag the park's website or social pages, or any of the many tags on this part that are a non-physical fact about the park.
	5	2017-02-08 17:30:03 UTC	Fortepc	Look at my edit history, I'm not some token kid trying to vandalize the map. I care about accuracy. I'm seeking to use my local knowledge to map with the greatest accuracy possible. With as much information about the POIs as possible.
	6	2017-02-08 18:29:34 UTC	Nakaner	Hi Fortepc, adding arg:ingress=portalfarm, arg:pokemongo=pokestopfarm and arg:pokemongo_1=nest does not meet our guidelines about verifiability (also known as the "On The Ground Rule"). Please only add information to OpenStreetMap which everyone can VERIFY ON THE GROUND. https://wiki...
	7	2017-02-08 18:30:46 UTC	Nakaner	PS Freedom Park has a very strange tagging with dozens of uppercase keys which also is against our rules but that does not make your edits better. The edit which added those uppercase keys might be treated the same way as you.
	8	2017-02-09 17:19:12 UTC	Fortepc	@Nakaner, Yes. I am very familiar with the OSM's on the ground rule. But rule is for mapping things, not adding information to the tags of things. And I am also following all of the rules present on the Pokemon Go blogpost you referred to. I'm improving accuracy of what is on the ground, as well as ...

45897722 by Bgabor	1	2017-02-08 11:38:10 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you used the tag "Building features=building" on 207 buildings - this is not a defined tag in OSM. What is its purpose? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-08 14:39:52 UTC	Bgabor	Well, seems by mistake - mixed the tag what was used in ID.

45849535 by anca_mihaela	1	2017-02-07 12:25:43 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please don't add junction=roundabout to circular streets without knowing the situation on ground. E.g. this one is no roundabout (as described in the german note on it) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25444119 Also, all your tags have a spelling mistake 'jonction' instead of 'junction'

45850681 by kre3d	1	2017-02-07 11:51:15 UTC	mueschel	Hi, there are ~15 ways with a spelling mistake "shouder" instead of "shoulder". Could you have a look? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-07 13:02:57 UTC	kre3d	Oops. Should be better now. Thanks for pointing it out!

26356009 by rayquaza	1	2017-02-05 21:58:44 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, du hast hier vor einiger Zeit Relationen angelegt, denen das type-Tag fehlt. Kannst du das noch ergänzen? Gruß, Jan z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4139718
	2	2017-02-06 08:44:39 UTC	Nakaner	Hallo Jan, in meinen Augen (als Eisenbahnmapper) sind die Inhalte dieser Relation nicht vor Ort überprüfbar und genügen daher nicht den Anforderungen, die an Objekte gestellt werden, die in OSM eingetragen werden. Mit "Lupe Neuostheim" ist höchstwahrscheinlich eine D...

44219844 by KartoGrapHiti	1	2017-02-05 21:44:05 UTC	mueschel	Wurde hier die Ampel tatsächlich wieder abgebaut? http://osm.org/node/339513244 Vor ein paar Monaten war sie noch da.

8390094 by Michael_Stellichte	1	2017-02-05 21:30:31 UTC	mueschel	Hallo Michael, ist zwar schon lange her, aber: Was befindet sich eigentlich an den "Planeten-"Knoten? Nur ein Name ist so nichtssagend. Eine Informationstafel oder so? Dann könnte man das entsprechend taggen. Gruß, Jan

45298842 by Saskia Reichert	1	2017-02-05 21:28:00 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, vorher stammen diese Namen? Informationen aus anderen Karten dürfen in der Regel nicht verwendet werden (Lizenzen!) Außerdem stimmt das Tagging so nicht: Ein Knoten nur mit einem "name"-Tag beschreibt nicht, um was es sich handelt. Gruß, Jan

45793071 by aiwetir	1	2017-02-05 14:19:09 UTC	mueschel	Hi, why did you remove all the good tags again and re-added many tags that don't seem to belong to OSM? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-05 18:29:22 UTC	aiwetir	The border on the portion of the Winema National Forest in this region http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?#map=16/43.0869/-121.8861 appears to be backwards, it shows landuse forest on the basemap but when editing, the border is on the land around the forest. I reverted to make sure it wasn't somethi...
	3	2017-02-05 18:33:56 UTC	mueschel	JOSM shows the marker on the wrong side, because there is no way to decide which is the right one by looking at one outer way only. As soon as you download the whole multi-polygon, it switches to the correct side. There is no "backwards" with respect to the direction of outer ways of mult...
	4	2017-02-05 18:40:08 UTC	aiwetir	I saw that just now in JOSM, I was obviously editing on the web application. When you look at it on the web application it indeed looks backwards whether there is a backwards or not.
	5	2017-02-05 19:04:39 UTC	mueschel	The problem is the same for both editors, they just can't decide what is inner and outer without loading the full relation - in case of iD I don't know if this is even possible. When handling huge multi-polygons like this, JOSM is a much better choice. E.g. because you can selectively load the fores...
	6	2017-02-05 19:40:16 UTC	aiwetir	I could use help, changing all the tags is easy enough but I just took a closer look at the overlapping areas and it's pretty complex. First, large areas of the Gilchrist and Deschutes overlap, then the borders should probably be fixed up so the nodes align to ways or other nodes (that's easy enoug...
	7	2017-02-05 20:25:59 UTC	aiwetir	As it turns out, much has changed in that region since a land purchase just a few years ago. I'm going to delete the Gilchrist and start anew with new shapefiles.

45767260 by Евгений Мавлик	1	2017-02-05 14:15:16 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of this node? Looks like something went wrong with copy and paste. Cheers, Jan

45770698 by Alisha12	1	2017-02-05 12:57:11 UTC	mueschel	Hi, the tagging of this node doesn't seem right. It is now a sports center, a group home, a foundation and a locality in the same place. Could you correct this? Jan

45774498 by katpatuka	1	2017-02-04 15:32:00 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added 45 villages with some strange tags, was this a mistake? E.g. CODE94X=903035 GLOBAL=0 PRIORITY=NONE VILLAGE_ID=5826 http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4227632087 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-04 15:39:01 UTC	katpatuka	hopefully not ;) The names are from the 11000 villages file mentioned on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Laos/RoadsRiversBoundaries
	3	2017-02-04 15:41:12 UTC	mueschel	I didn't mean adding the villages, just these tags. They don't look like they belong to OSM and are not used in other places.
	4	2017-02-04 16:52:19 UTC	katpatuka	well yes - they are in the original file and I left them as is - comparable to other for osm useless tags like gns:dsg etc. originating from imports

35850854 by metaldommi	1	2017-02-04 15:28:44 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, hier sind 8 Wege ohne Tags entstanden, kannst du da nochmal nachschauen? z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/385145640 Gruß, Jan

45716623 by Olikos	1	2017-02-04 15:02:17 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, hier ist etwas schiefgegangen, die Wege habe alle keinerlei Tags. Kannst du da nochmal drüberschauen? Gruß, Jan

45741078 by nhdr	1	2017-02-04 12:29:28 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of these two buildings? There is a strange tag. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114516260 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306543826 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-02-06 18:31:36 UTC	nhdr	Oops sorry, it was my mistake. I fixed it already. Thank you)

45727709 by Linie29	1	2017-02-03 13:21:15 UTC	mueschel	http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29110888 maxspeed 80 oder 90? Da ist ein tag zu viel. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-02-03 17:14:23 UTC	Linie29	Danke für den Hinweis! Habe auf den richtigen "maxspeed:backward"-Tag korrigiert.

45691543 by König Near	1	2017-02-03 12:00:27 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added many ways with "Highway" or "Higway" tags - could you correct these? Only 'highway' is a valid key. Cheers, Jan

45692087 by fegtherm	1	2017-02-03 11:48:31 UTC	mueschel	Hi, can you check the tagging of this way? Looks strange... http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470722745 Cheers, Jan

45668406 by yopaseopor	1	2017-01-31 11:34:49 UTC	mueschel	Hi, it's nice to see that you put a lot of effort in mapping destinations. Unfortunately, there is nobody who can use this data, because your tagging style is not documented and used only by you. Why don't you join the common tagging scheme which is successfully used thousands of times all over the...
	2	2017-01-31 18:36:29 UTC	yopaseopor	The System and the whole scheme is not ready to put it in the wiki so work is in progress. I am mapping complete traffic signs (not only destination traffic signs), but also destinations (which has a clearer scheme) so the actual scheme is getting too little and simple. Traffic signs are being rende...
	3	2017-01-31 18:52:07 UTC	mueschel	All the tags listed in this project are well-described in the wiki. Take the node from this changeset as example: I have absolutely no clue why there is a need to list a single destination 15 times on a simple two-lane road like this. I strongly suggest to ask the communicty for comments before ...
	4	2017-01-31 23:45:32 UTC	yopaseopor	Ok you win. Please read this. Good night. http://yopaseopor.blogspot.com.es/2017/01/yomapeo-ok-you-win.html
	5	2017-02-03 11:42:01 UTC	mueschel	"Then hell break loose" - Just because people remind you on the way things should be done in OSM? Have fun putting tags on nodes - nobody will be able to make any use of them as long as you don't write documentation for it.
	6	2017-02-03 19:06:00 UTC	yopaseopor	Thank you for your help :S
	7	2017-02-05 18:14:57 UTC	yopaseopor	https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_traffic_signs_tagging

45214763 by Stereo	1	2017-01-17 11:48:12 UTC	mueschel	Could you please stop adding your personal fantasy about tagging again and again and stop vandalizing OSM data?
	2	2017-01-17 21:43:55 UTC	trial	+1, please at least describe what you want to do. Except BS I mean.
	3	2017-02-02 16:59:13 UTC	Stereo	Of course it's partly meant as a joke. At the SotM EU, we came across this strange box, and decided to dedicate it as a monument to RichardF. The RichardF box does exist, and the physical properties are all correct. Someone even slapped a "Surveyed by OSM" sticker on it. It is an exampl...
	4	2017-02-02 18:12:20 UTC	mueschel	And this "joke" now renders on every map as a huge pile of Unicode garbage, gives errors because of incorrect units in the height tag and service_times that don't follow the documented tagging rules.
	5	2017-02-02 19:38:24 UTC	trial	Not on every map, http://b.tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=20&lat=49.0107&lon=8.38717&layers=B0000000FFFFFF renders it properly. Both renderers are based on the same stack. But please move your tests to http://www.opengeofiction.net/#map=5/51.500/-0.100 and add the link or the Wiki so that ...
	6	2017-02-02 19:50:58 UTC	mueschel	The name:fr tag, which is rendered by openstreetmap.fr doesn't contain the Unicode stuff. The default osm.org map shows the Unicode properly, too. But tag is just a collection of Unicode weirdness without any meaning.
	7	2017-02-02 20:03:12 UTC	trial	Right. Time to cleanup!

45658625 by gezginrocker	1	2017-02-02 11:28:28 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of this road? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46039701 The name tag is somehow strange.
	2	2017-02-02 14:33:38 UTC	gezginrocker	I've corrected it, thanks for your attention.

45714170 by mueschel	1	2017-02-02 07:52:19 UTC	eric_	Whitehouse Terrace being part of the north side of Grange Loan, I changed it into name:left as it was originally (i.e. before a contributor changed it into name:South Side). Thanks anyway to have spotted this error.
	2	2017-02-02 09:19:48 UTC	mueschel	Thanks! I'm sorry for the mistake but I forgot to check the history of the way...
	3	2017-02-21 19:16:18 UTC	eric_	No problem (sorry to answer so late).

45634490 by philh-591	1	2017-01-31 12:04:01 UTC	mueschel	Hi, there is no need to translate tags like "tourism:fr = chambres d'hôte" - The translation is the same for all tourism = guest_house tags world-wide and can be done automatically by the software showing the data. Jan
	2	2017-02-01 11:10:02 UTC	philh-591	Thank you for your comment. I'll remove the unnecessary tag. However, I'll carry on tagging specifically bakers' shops in France as shop:fr = boulanger, patissier or shop:fr = pain, patissier according to whether the shop displays "Boulanger" or "Pain". This i...
	3	2017-02-01 11:46:17 UTC	mueschel	Sure, if it provides additional information, an additional tag makes sense. As you describe a sub-group of bakeries, I would opt for a tagging like this: shop = bakery bakery = boulanger
	4	2017-02-04 14:33:33 UTC	philh-591	OK. Actually I'll find out if the French User Group have a recommended practice on tagging for bakeries. If not, I'll put forward the method shop=bakery; bakery=boulanger shop=bakery; bakery=dépôt de pain
	5	2017-02-04 16:29:50 UTC	trial	http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:shop%3Dbakery mueschel advice is good. Prevent using multiple keys as long as possible. So if needed; I would add: produced_on_site = yes/no craft=backery. pastry=yes... See [OSM-talk-fr]

45625198 by KartoGrapHiti	1	2017-01-31 15:48:03 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, das Tag "maxstay@Mi,Sa = 60" funktioniert so nicht, weil nicht per Software auswertbar. Besser ist: maxstay:conditional = 60 @ (We,Sa) oder noch besser, mit Einschränkung auf den tatsächlichen Zeitraum, oder gilt das 24 Stunden? Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-01-31 15:58:43 UTC	KartoGrapHiti	Vielen Dank. Ich hatte im Wiki nicht verstanden, wie man es einträgt. Jetzt habe ich versucht, es zu korrigieren: maxstay:conditional=60 @ (We,Sa 07:00-14:00) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45689146#map=19/50.58734/8.67796 Wenn das noch nicht ganz stimmt, bitte gerne korrigieren....
	3	2017-01-31 16:02:12 UTC	mueschel	Passt. Zeitangaben lassen sich wie üblich hier testen: http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=We%2CSa%2007%3A00-14%3A00&DATE=1485878400000&lat=48.7769&lon=9.1844&mode=0

45680756 by geri-oc	1	2017-01-31 11:57:22 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, was meinst du mit "chocker:right"? Klingt für mich eher nach traffic_calming:forward. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-01-31 14:54:42 UTC	geri-oc	traffic_calming:*=chocker ist aber nicht im WIKI dokumentiert - deshalb hatte ich chocker=right als ergänzende Information zu gefügt. Ist für mich auch eine einfacher Auswertung, da ich nicht nach allen Varianten suchen muss. Es ist eine kleine Pflanzinsel im Fahrbahnbereich. Bild un...
	3	2017-01-31 15:13:12 UTC	mueschel	:forward/:backward und :left/:right sind bei den wenigsten Tags explizit dokumentiert, machen aber generell bei allen Straßeneigenschaften Sinn. Ob bei einem choker dieser Art ein traffic_calming:right oder traffic_calming:forward besser ist, weiß ich aber auch nicht. Hängt meine...
	4	2017-01-31 15:44:38 UTC	geri-oc	Ich würde es so lassen, da es auch mehrfach verwendet wird: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/choker#values PS: chocker in choker geändert - ist mir an zwei stellen aufgefallen

45616443 by carlosz22	1	2017-01-31 12:06:07 UTC	mueschel	Hi, found two ways with the tag 'roof:redge' - is this roof:edge or roof:ridge? Jan
	2	2017-01-31 16:21:00 UTC	carlosz22	Hi. Ops, my mistake :) Corrected. Thanks for the advice. Carlos

45582268 by Amiral Fromage	1	2017-01-31 11:55:54 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, kannst du hier das Tagging prüfen? 80 = 100 ist ein merkwürdiges Tag. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469609025
	2	2017-01-31 15:10:35 UTC	Amiral Fromage	Hallo, ich werde im nächsten Änderungssatz den Tag entfernen, danke für den Hinweis! Ebenso werde ich fehlende Langsamfahrsignale ergänzen.

45598407 by Bratananio	1	2017-01-31 11:54:55 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4640145541 313 = 314 is a strange tag. Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-01-31 13:47:49 UTC	Bratananio	Thanks for helping to correct this mistake. I've just corrected it.

45606851 by Jojo4u	1	2017-01-31 11:43:02 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, man_made:levels finde ich jetzt nicht so gelungen als neuen Tag - Stockwerke hat so eine Säule ja nicht. Außerdem gibt es eher keinen Grund hier einen eigenen Namespace mit man_made: zu benutzen - auf was sollte sich height sonst beziehen? Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-01-31 17:29:00 UTC	Jojo4u	Ja die "Stockwerke" waren schon als building unpassend und habe ich jetzt entfernt. Geblieben ist nur man_made:part=yes.

45578497 by paulbe	1	2017-01-30 11:27:41 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found the key "noezit" on several ways. Could you correct the spelling and move the tag to the last node of the way? (noexit is usually not put on the whole way, but just on the last unconnected node)
	2	2017-01-31 17:16:23 UTC	paulbe	done !

45555259 by JinukKim	1	2017-01-30 09:44:47 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you define these two tags differently? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3213092963 opening_hours_비수기=AM 09:00 ~ AM 12:00 opening_hours_성수기=AM 08:00 ~ AM 1:00 (성수기) What does '비수기' mean? Tags must be in English, otherwise they can not be understood by softw...

45545914 by Chrissssss	1	2017-01-30 09:41:39 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, diese beiden Tags passsen nicht zum parking:lane-Schema. Kannst du da nochmal nachschauen? parking:left:free = * parking:right:residents = * https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane Gruß, Jan

45425679 by taborda	1	2017-01-27 11:48:49 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put several strange tags on these objects, like these: heightBe_1 =m heightBelo =3 numberOfFl =0 numberOf_1 =1 Could you convert them to well-defined tags? Jan
	2	2017-01-27 12:03:27 UTC	taborda	Fixed :)
	3	2017-01-30 09:34:29 UTC	mueschel	Looks like your fix wasn't uploaded correctly, the tags are still there.

45437010 by Retaj Ahmed	1	2017-01-30 09:01:51 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM! The hotel you added is already present in OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1535788924 I deleted your new node because objects should be mapped only once.

45290621 by stvmz backes	1	2017-01-29 22:19:55 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, aus welcher Quelle stammen diese Gebäudeumrisse? Hast du sichergestellt, dass die Lizenz dafür mit OSM / ODbL kompatibel ist? Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-01-30 11:18:25 UTC	stvmz backes	Hallo, ich bin Mitarbeiterin des Bauamts der Stadt Mainz. Die Stadt Mainz hat sich entschlossen, in die Pflege der Hausnummern und Gebäude in OSM einzusteigen. Die Gebäudeumrisse stammen aus eigenen Daten der Bauakte, sowie eigenen Luftbildern. Die Stadt Mainz prüft zur Zeit die Frei...
	3	2017-01-30 12:12:04 UTC	Polarbear	Hallo stvmz backes, das ist ja wunderbar, dass ihr da auch selbst aktiv werdet. Die Nutzungsberechtigung eurer Daten und die Art des Zugangs müsste aber dokumentiert werden, und es muss erkennbar sein, dass der Erteiler der Erlaubnis dazu auch berechtigt ist. Ich empfehle hierzu den Kontakt zu ...

45550173 by Markus Gastauer	1	2017-01-29 14:53:06 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you please explain the edits you made? Most of the keys you used are not defined and used nowhere else: bibliographicCitation =ISSN 1927-0488 E-ISSN 1927-0496 nameAccordingTo = http://www.tropicos.org/Name/1701853 plot \tPlotLagoas15 references =http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v2n3p115...
	2	2017-01-29 18:39:29 UTC	naoliv	Markus, talvez você queira utilizar as tags corretas para representar as informações? Por exemplo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:genus e/ou https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species e/ou https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:taxon Se precisar de alguma ajuda pa...

45507823 by a_isaeva	1	2017-01-29 14:37:19 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469031630 24 = service looks like a mistake and I think the house number is wrong. Cheers, Jan

45526242 by kräckel	1	2017-01-29 14:34:01 UTC	mueschel	Was soll uns das Tag "bug concat dup Road =yes" sagen?
	2	2017-01-30 09:45:10 UTC	kräckel	C&P versehen falscher Wert, ist berichtigt Grüße & Danke

45506683 by chris66	1	2017-01-28 16:56:05 UTC	mueschel	Hi Chris, don't forget about the tag traffic_signals:direction on intersections like this with individually mapped traffic lights. Jan

45558610 by ues8992	1	2017-01-28 16:51:33 UTC	mueschel	Hi, welcome to OSM! Please note that all keys you use to identify an object needs to be in English - everything else is not understood by the software and is not shown on maps. Have a look to the wiki ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org ) to find the common tags. Cheers, Jan

45425467 by Juan Diego Requena Ruiz	1	2017-01-27 11:56:39 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of this way? If it is a road, please add a highway-Tag. What is the meaning of the tag "Limpieza Lunes =equipo 1"? Jan

45444705 by taborda	1	2017-01-27 11:54:02 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put two uncommon tags on this node: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4629999312 maxspeed:2:forward =20 side =right Could you change them to well-defined tags so that the information can be understood by software? Jan

45514175 by nohk	1	2017-01-27 11:50:11 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you put the key "name:Ko_rm" on many objects - the correct spelling is "name:ko_rm". I just fixed that. Jan

45423185 by krystel94	1	2017-01-27 11:41:31 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added several buildings on top of already existing ones. Could you have a look and correct these mistakes? Additionally, you added many tags which have no meaning in OSM - only well-defined tags as described in the Wiki can be used. Examples: Building \tYes Capacity \t1000 Condtition \t...

45485326 by jengelh	1	2017-01-26 12:02:13 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, kannst du bei den alten Namen und Datumsangaben mit dem richtigen Format arbeiten? z.B. 1900-01-01--2000-12-31 Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Date_namespace Sonst sind die Daten leider ziemlich nutzlos. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-01-26 12:09:31 UTC	jengelh	Gut zu wissen! Werde ich dann noch anpassen, danke.

45383946 by Aleksei Potov	1	2017-01-25 12:31:45 UTC	mueschel	Hi, may I point you to this proposal for mapping lane connections? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/transit It's 'just' a proposal, but already used in some places. Cheers, Jan

45389225 by gerhard81	1	2017-01-25 12:24:02 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, du hast hier sehr viele Häuser mit dem Tag "Wirling = 8" hochgeladen, kannst du das korrigieren? Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-01-25 15:13:00 UTC	gerhard81	Hallo Jan! Danke ans aufmerksam machen. Ich kümmere mich die Tage darum. Grüße Gerhard

45362140 by andrewpmk	1	2017-01-25 12:19:40 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this parking lot? This tag is strange: capacity:disabledy = street_lamp http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467673707 Cheers, Jan

45450086 by Andrew Matheny_import	1	2017-01-25 12:15:06 UTC	mueschel	There are again 1500++ buildings with wrong tags. Could you fix the tagging before uploading to OSM? There is just no need to distribute this information to hundreds of users and then changing it a few days later. addr_num addr_stree shrt Btw, the source given in your changeset is wrong.
	2	2017-01-25 23:59:32 UTC	Andrew Matheny	Fixed. These are fields that are dropped/mapped to OSM tags before import, but it sometimes doesn't happen with the repetitive process :)

45283768 by Lothar Schiborr_1	1	2017-01-24 22:06:06 UTC	mueschel	Bitte nicht blind "junction = roundabout" an jede kreisförmige Straße schreiben. Wendehämmer sind keine Kreisel.
	2	2017-01-24 22:57:58 UTC	Lothar Schiborr_1	Stimmt, war Blödsinn. Ist zwar eine Wendestelle, gebaut wie mini_roundabout. Was ist richtig. Wendestelle oder Minikreisel
	3	2017-01-24 23:35:15 UTC	mueschel	Wenn keine Schilder stehen, ist es weder ein roundabout noch ein mini-roundabout. Entweder ein node mit highway=turning_loop oder einfach eine ringförmige Straße - kreisförmig würde ich sie allerdings in der Regel eher nicht machen, mehr wie ein Tropfen oder ein "P" ge...
	4	2017-01-25 12:19:02 UTC	Lothar Schiborr_1	Hier würde ich ihn als Kreis lassen wie er ist, bildet die Wirklichkeit ab

45353389 by blauer_elefant	1	2017-01-24 22:10:38 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, geht dieser Kreisel wirklich in die falsche Richtung? http://osm.org/node/254598207 Jan
	2	2017-01-24 22:22:44 UTC	blauer_elefant	k.A.; ich habe auf den bing-Luftbildern gesehen, dass dort ein Minikreisel ist und habe in JOSM die entsprechende Vorlage genutzt ohne darauf zu achten, ob die eine Richtung hat/angibt. Ich könnte das demnächst prüfen. --jens
	3	2017-01-24 22:35:39 UTC	mueschel	Dann lösche ich das mal, da hast du wahrscheinlich aus Versehen etwas ausgewählt. Bei "normalen" Kreiseln ist die Angabe ja überflüssig.
	4	2017-01-24 22:41:51 UTC	blauer_elefant	danke. ich achte beim nächsten Mal drauf

36064032 by GerdP	1	2017-01-24 22:32:37 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, was spricht denn gegen highway=preproposed? Das ist das übliche Tag für eine Straße in diesem Planungsstand. Gruß, Jan
	2	2017-01-25 05:52:00 UTC	GerdP	Hallo Jan, siehe diese CS-Diskussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/7372351#map=11/49.8861/9.7954

45378062 by village	1	2017-01-24 11:29:21 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, das Tagging kommt mir falsch vor. - Die Straße ist immer motor_vehicle=private, außer jetzt sind wegen der Baustelle Lieferfahrzeuge erlaubt. - Das Tag "temporary = date_on=2017-01-14" gibt es nicht, Zeiten werden mittels der conditional-Syntax angegeben. - Warum is...
	2	2017-01-26 08:37:42 UTC	village	Hm, ich weiß nicht, ob du die Situation vor Ort gesehen hast: Die Straße ist vorhanden, aber auf diesem Teil komplett gesperrt, der Fußweg auf der rechten Seite gar nicht mehr vorhanden - und dient als Baustellenzufahrt. Wenn da jetzt wirklich gebaut wird, dauert das bestimmt 1&fr...

45366886 by SK53	1	2017-01-24 09:58:53 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found 25 objects with the key "brrier" in your edits, would you mind correcting that? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-01-24 10:14:57 UTC	SK53	Fixed: copying tags from object to object has it's issues :-)

45409363 by njsurf1813	1	2017-01-24 09:57:53 UTC	mueschel	Hi, there are some new "buildlings" added by you: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/lsV
	2	2017-01-24 18:24:20 UTC	njsurf1813	mueschel, Indeed they have. I'd made a circular building in josm with the 'buildlings' tag and haven't been too careful to make sure that future not-made-with-building-tool buildings are not accidentally tagged the same I suppose.Thanks for looking out. I will fix and make sure I don't make the m...

45330656 by Luuuddooo	1	2017-01-22 18:31:58 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this way? SUR=GRO looks like a mistake http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467476183 Jan
	2	2017-01-22 19:17:11 UTC	Luuuddooo	Thanks a lot Jan for noticing this mistake ! I probably thought JOSM would autocomplete to surface=ground but it couldn't work because of CAPS LOCK...

45333480 by WMietek	1	2017-01-21 20:13:24 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of this relation? http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6894134 I don't understand the key "-- = 7" Jan

45301412 by micahcochran	1	2017-01-21 20:10:55 UTC	mueschel	Hi, there is a spelling mistake in the fcc key on this node: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1785267661 Could you check and correct it?
	2	2017-01-24 19:55:10 UTC	micahcochran	I have corrected the misspelled tag. Thanks!

45299033 by francoLI	1	2017-01-21 20:06:14 UTC	mueschel	Hi, you added some ref-Tags with varying spelling. Could you use a consistent tag? ref:eUR27 ref:eur27 ref:eEUR27 REF:EUR27 ref:eUnis REF:EUNIS Common practice seems to be ref:EUNIS and ref:EUR27
	2	2017-01-21 21:19:55 UTC	francoLI	First I apologize for my bad English. I'm using google translator. I thought that tags were not case sensitive. I will try to correct. the difference between EUR 27 and EUNIS is how subtle. EUR27 refer basically to the areas of Applied directives Habitat, while EUNIS is more general and sometimes...

45282432 by dnwilson	1	2017-01-21 20:02:01 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found many ways with strange tags, like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467016766 Could you have a look and correct these? Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-01-22 05:21:10 UTC	dnwilson	Thanks for letting me know I have fixed it. It was caused by cut and past going very wrong.

45278176 by piligab	1	2017-01-21 19:56:53 UTC	mueschel	Here is another new way with strange tags: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466974600
	2	2017-01-21 20:21:31 UTC	piligab	Hi Mueschel. I proceeded to change the tags. Thanks for your feedback. Regards.

45339357 by gryffindor	1	2017-01-21 18:08:21 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found tags like sidewalk hazard travel hazard trip hazard Sidewalkhazards on several objects. This might be a good description of something, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Please have a look to the wiki about common tags. Jan

45305050 by taborda	1	2017-01-21 13:45:04 UTC	mueschel	Hi, I found this way with strange tags. Could you correct this? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467242504 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-01-21 15:48:36 UTC	taborda	Hi. Sorry. I have made a mistake. I Will solve it. Thanks.

45316977 by Afia	1	2017-01-21 13:31:58 UTC	mueschel	Hi, wo kommen den diese ganzen Informationen her? Von Bing, wie du angibst, sicher nicht. Außerdem ist beim Tagging einiges schiefgelaufen. generator:output:electricity=yes/kWh - da macht der Wert keinen Sinn generator: location - da gehört kein Leerzeichen rein Und alle Knoten de...
	2	2017-01-21 14:31:27 UTC	DD1GJ	Zudem sind die Häuser jetzt doppelt vorhanden. Daher habe ich alles zurückgesetzt
	3	2017-01-26 09:31:20 UTC	Nakaner	@DD1GJ @mueschel siehe meinen Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45504461

43332716 by venerdi	1	2017-01-20 22:45:53 UTC	mueschel	Bitte fügen nicht blind "junction = roundabout" an Wege an, nur weil Osmose eine Warnung anzeigt. Ein roundabout muss immer mit einem entsprechenden blauen Schild ausgestattet sein, das ist bei Wendeplätzen wie diesem sicher nicht der Fall.
	2	2017-01-20 22:50:43 UTC	mueschel	Hi, please don't add "junction = roundabout" to places like this. This tag is only used in case there are the corresponding traffic signs and rules in place.
	3	2017-01-29 18:43:50 UTC	venerdi	I apologize for the error. I deduced the rules of precedence from aerial photos and I could not check for traffic signal. Thanks for your correction. In the case of closed lines that are reported as errors by Osmose it would probably be better to divide them into two parts to avoid the problem.

45137545 by Lokalfuerst	1	2017-01-20 22:28:51 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, dein mapping von einfachen Kreuzungen mit sehr vielen einzelnen Wegen entspricht nicht der gängen Praxis und führt zu vielen Problemen, z.B. an dieser Kreuzung: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45137545#map=19/50.46256/8.37944 Da stimmen in vielen Fällen die jetzt not...

45211018 by jagdpächter	1	2017-01-20 22:13:30 UTC	mueschel	Hallo, bei deinen Edits von Waldwegen sind hier in der Gegend sehr viele "überlappende Wege" entstanden. D.h. zwei Wege, die auf einem ganzen Stück übereinander liegen. Würdest du da nochmal einen Blick drauf werfen? http://keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12&l...

45257590 by Carlo Folini	1	2017-01-19 11:39:47 UTC	mueschel	Hi, this valley has a strange tag: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465942245 "Val Désél = Senté de la Gesa" Is this the name? Jan
	2	2017-01-19 12:22:46 UTC	Carlo Folini	Sorry, my fault! It should be a 'name' tag. Thanks for pointing me to this. Can I ask you how do you discovered it? Ciao Carlo
	3	2017-01-19 12:51:08 UTC	mueschel	I wrote a small script that shows all the new keys appearing in the database: http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm