Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-08-17 10:55:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added tags like this one to more than 200 objects. Could you have a look and remove them?
extensions \t<extensions xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ogr="http://osgeo.org/gdal" xmlns="http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1">
<o...
12017-08-17 10:45:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some ways with only strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514499767
Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-17 10:40:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like this and another changeset added 51 objects with strange tags like these:

ADDRTYPE=SUBORD
FULLADDR=20 MALACHIGAN, CROISSANT DU
PI_MUNICIP=__AK2WLJ
POINT_X=383815.2027
POINT_Y=5034062.8701
22017-08-17 11:30:45 UTCLogicalViolinist Sorry about that, ill remove them
32017-08-17 12:18:55 UTCLogicalViolinist Corrected in: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51203524
12017-08-16 10:56:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key 'estd:' to various objects. This key is not yet used in any other place. I guess you should use "start_date" instead, which is used everywhere else.

Also, please use the Gregorian Calendar for dates - otherwise data can not be easily understood by any OSM tool.
\...
12017-08-16 10:55:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key 'estd:' to various objects. This key is not yet used in any other place. I guess you should use "start_date" instead, which is used everywhere else.

Also, please use the Gregorian Calendar for dates - otherwise data can not be easily understood by any OSM tool.
\...
12017-08-16 10:33:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added a new key here, and used several different spellings:

FR:grande_circulation
fr:grande_circulation
fr:grande_circulation_1

OSM Tags are case sensitive, could you change them to a common spelling? Additionally, we usually don't put a language code in front of a tag. It should be...
22017-08-16 12:23:31 UTCbibi6 Hi,
Thanks for pointing me this out. I actually wanted to use the FR:grande_circulation tag, but I probably did a wrong manip for the others (unless iD doesn't care about case :/ )
Anyway, taking your second remark into account, I'm going to use grande_circulation instead. (Changeset 51169807 is ...
12017-08-06 13:09:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these nodes? Most have tags which look like they don't belong to OSM, like these:
Lat=32.231613
Lon=-110.971756
STINTERSEC=STONE AV / UNIVERSITY BL

Jan
22017-08-06 13:11:03 UTCmueschel Addendum:
It looks like none of these points is actually part of a road - that is required to be able to use this information e.g. in routing engines.
32017-08-08 21:45:43 UTCDylansc These are all tagged according to People For Bikes OpenStreetMap Tagging Guidelines for HAWKs (signaled crosswalks)... I followed the guidelines listed here

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HuAXQUnCEcv9aLZyIDHkLTJ5ZSKfB-U4MlJSmN-1BLk/edit#heading=h.tle1tl5ruh6c

These points aren't part of t...
42017-08-08 23:08:41 UTCmueschel This document is a good reference. But there is no reference to the keys Lat, Lon, STINTERSEC I mentioned above, which should not be there.

Ways consist of points, and the crossing tags need to be on a point that belongs to a way. It's as simple as that.


52017-08-15 22:10:50 UTCDylansc Would the best method for me to fix this be for each 131 nodes:
1. go into "edit with iD" edit mode
2. Delete the 3 unnecessary tags (Lat, Lon, and STINTERSEC)
3. snap it to appropriate intersection/roadway

Additionally, I feel I should add some sort of tag that says specifically a H...
62017-08-16 08:11:45 UTCmueschel Yes, this is a possible way.
a) if you use iD, check all tags again after snapping the node to the intersection - some of them are already tagged and this might cause iD to add wrong tags.

b) Are these traffic lights for pedestrians only or do they control the intersection as well?
http://www....
12017-08-15 20:37:54 UTCmueschel Fixed several 'maxpeed' tags - could you check if I got them all?
12017-08-15 20:37:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "maxpeed:tilting" on a bunch of tracks. Could you edit them and add the missing 's'?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-15 21:58:10 UTCflierfy Hello Jan,
I thank you for the hint. I've added the missing letter.
With thankful regards, Stephan
12017-08-14 11:35:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of 'eruv' on this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513968801

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-14 14:56:41 UTCElliottPlack Jan,

Sure, an eruv is a physical object that serves as a symbolic boundary in the Jewish Orthodox faith. Read more:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv

There isn't a great tag for this yet on OSM, so I added this under the premise of the "Any tags you like" principle (http://wiki.opens...
32017-08-14 15:13:16 UTCmueschel Alright, I haven't seen this before.
I see one potential problem with the tagging: A barrier=* implies an access restriction, by default access=no. So, if anybody by mistake adds a common node with any highway, routing engines might think traffic is blocked.
I don't think we have a proper tagging...
42017-08-15 02:48:02 UTCElliottPlack Jan: I'm glad that you found this and commented. I think your idea is superb. I was trying to decide if I should use an existing key like barrier but you make a good point that it could be interpreted by a routing engine as a generic barrier. Better to start something totally fresh.

What do you t...
52017-08-15 18:42:39 UTCmueschel ':' versus '_' - there is no functional difference between the two. Usually, ':' is used for subkeys, e.g. a key that further describes the main key, e.g. 'capacity' and the more specific 'capacity:disabled'. The underscore is more used like a replacement for a space as in "internet_access"...
12017-08-14 09:22:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "Wifi_Etecsa = Wifi_Etecsa" on several nodes - this is not a common tag, could you explain its meaning? If it is the operator of the Wifi, consider the key internet_access:operator

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-14 09:19:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check the Russian tags on this object? All objects have to use the tags described in the wiki, otherwise this information can not be understood by any software.

деятельность = отдых
деятельность_1 = пансионат
озеро = исс...
12017-08-14 08:54:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
what do you mean using the prefix "will:" on these buildings? The usual prefixes include planned:, proposed: and "construction", see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-14 09:43:42 UTCfreeExec Thanks for the help, I will change for the planned.
12017-08-13 18:07:29 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier Öffnungszeiten eingetragen - könntest du sie noch ändern, so dass sie nach dem gängigen Schema getagged sind? So lassen sie sich dann auch automatisch auswerten und in diversen Tools anzeigen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening hours

Wenn ...
12017-08-10 19:10:20 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier mehrfach 'raised:building' geschrieben - meinst du 'razed'?
Jan
22017-08-11 15:57:24 UTCgeozeisig Du hast recht ich finde es aber spontan nicht wieder.
32017-08-11 16:25:38 UTCmueschel Kein Problem:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qWB
12017-08-11 10:59:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. All objects in OSM need to have a tag that describes what they are. Just putting a human readable description on a node won't do the job. The wiki shows how these tags should look like, e.g. here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dbasin

Jan
12017-08-09 07:00:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key 'namleg_en' on several boundaries. This key is new and not used in other places. Maybe the usual tags 'official_name', 'official_name:en' or 'full_name' fit?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-09 14:33:11 UTCUndearius My apologies. I had originally intended to remove these tags but they made it easier for filtering. The value of these tags is their full, proper legal name so they may be useful.
The 'namleg_en' tag is the same as the 'name' tag with the addition of "Township of" or "County of"...
32017-08-10 17:15:54 UTCmueschel 'official_name:en' is used almost 2000 times, and follows the guidelines shown on the Wiki page on name tags.
Thanks for taking care!
42017-08-14 19:53:47 UTCUndearius I've changed the tags to the correct ones. Thank you for the help.
12017-08-06 13:07:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "Varsure" on some of these nodes. Could you explain its meaning?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-09 09:37:29 UTCddm-dolomitico Hi Jan,

the "Varsure" tag is a editing error (in fact "Varsure" is the name of a location); I corrected the wrong tags with "name: lld" or "loc_name".

Thank you very much for your error reporting. In the future, I will pay more attention to OSM's editing...
32017-08-09 09:51:43 UTCddm-dolomitico Hi Jan,

I was wrong, now all "Varsure" tags are correct (I found out the use of "taginfo" so I saw the list of all the wrong tags)

Cheers, Danilo
42017-08-09 12:04:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
thanks for taking the time and fixing this. You can also use http://overpass-turbo.eu/to search for a key (click on 'wizard' and enter "Varsure=* global" then click run)
12017-08-09 07:17:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
bist du sicher, dass die Fahrt hier wirklich 20 Minuten dauert? Oder meinst du, dass die Fähre alle 20 Minuten fährt?

Jan
12017-08-06 20:11:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many very strange tags here and on other restaurants. Please have a look to the Wiki to see how objects are tagged in OSM.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513151990
DiningRoomHours
DriveThruHours
EnglishApplicationUrl
HasDiningRoom
HasDriveThru
ImageUrl
Latitude
Longitude
O...
22017-08-06 20:21:05 UTCmneko I'm trying to follow the instructions on http://maproulette.org/ui/metrics/433
i might have misunderstood it
32017-08-06 21:50:48 UTCmueschel I don't think they meant to copy all the data from there. You can have a look how other restaurants of this chain are mapped:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qQe
42017-08-07 14:09:40 UTCmneko OK, I think I corrected the ones I broke
52017-08-08 18:29:35 UTCmueschel This looks good. *thumbs up
12017-08-08 10:28:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 32 buildings have the tag "B30 2DH=B30" which looks like a mistake. Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-08 14:17:43 UTCbrianboru Thanks Jan - what happened here I don't know! Corrected now
12017-08-08 10:27:16 UTCmueschel These changes contain 33x "maxpeed" instead of "maxspeed".
Jan
12017-08-07 11:11:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tag on this road (and other segments of it)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59990980
"L3036 = Reddy's Crossroads" looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-07 11:06:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 53 objects with the tag "stig=stig" which looks like a mistake, could you check that?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qQM

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-07 21:12:30 UTCfatuus Stig taggas med highway=path
12017-08-06 12:32:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check 23 of these lines? they have some strange tags like these which seem to be added by mistake:

CITYOBJECT_ID=186033
GMLID=BID_ba033755-60eb-4cfa-a17f-787c9a794cad
ROOF_TYPE=1000

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-06 13:48:28 UTCMarkus Valo Thanks for noticing! Tried to clean all of them. All of those tags are unnecessary.
32017-08-06 14:28:35 UTCmueschel Thanks for your effort. Here are the remaining ones:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qPZ
42017-08-06 14:49:54 UTCMarkus Valo All clean now, thanks for the tool link!
12017-08-06 13:17:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "caricato=false" on 41 ways. This tag is not used in any other place - could you explain its meaning?

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-06 12:59:17 UTCmueschel Is there any chance that this import gets cleaned up? (Just commenting this one changeset, not all of them)

There are hundreds of POIs without proper tags, with a lot of text in undocumented tags like "note50", "opening_hours" which don't use the documented syntax and so on.
...
12017-07-10 07:44:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these imported nodes?
- 'is_in' can not be used to tag addresses. Use addr:street and addr:housenumber instead
- 'Ref:FR:SIREN' should be 'ref:FR:SIREN'
- description1 and description2 are no recognized tags
- most nodes are missing a physical tag, describing ...
22017-08-06 12:55:26 UTCmueschel Is there any chance that this import gets cleaned up?
Various people are doing some corrections on this data, but in the end most of the information remains useless.

Jan
12017-07-06 08:29:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
this import of fountains doesn't seem to fit to the OSM license.
You put these tags on all nodes:
Fonte = Metropolitana Milanese - MM
Licenza = CC-BY
cc-by is not compatible with ODbL, see
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

And, please don't invent new keys li...
22017-07-06 08:52:17 UTCNemo_bis Sorry for the Italian keys, I was confused by the localisation. Will fix these in a moment.

The blog post you link is about the generic CC-BY licenses, but this dataset is under CC-BY-IT which has a special provision waiving all rights for databases, hence Creative Commons Italia believes such da...
32017-07-06 08:59:04 UTCmueschel Could you mention this specifically in the changeset comment / source tag? Just so that nobody else gets confused or thinks cc-by is sufficient.
42017-07-11 10:11:44 UTCAndreas Lattmann Ciao Nemo_bis, hai fatto la pagina nel Wiki per l' import? Non la riesco a trovare. Grazie
52017-08-05 18:20:31 UTCmueschel Are you still going to fix this and provide a documentation of the import?
12017-07-26 12:25:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong here - these nodes all have tags like "ref=290 = RU-KDA-6" - the key of this tag is 'ref=290' which can't be right. Could you have a look and fix this? It's about 150 different keys.
22017-08-05 18:07:28 UTCmueschel I changed these tags now. Please check if my edit is correct.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50868182
12017-08-05 17:46:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many objects with very strange tags here - for example

highway=64/24
natural=Chu Thị Thuong Ha
shop=TDok

What is the meaning of all this? Pleae have a look to the OSM wiki to learn about how objects have to be tagged to be usable by OSM users.

Cheers, Jan
12017-08-01 19:18:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are many nodes which have just strange tags like these:
CODLOC=12
GEOCODICE=12/5
GRAFICO=5
LINK=12-5
NCIV=5

Was this a mistake?
Jan
22017-08-02 07:55:12 UTCCUSPC I have joined a full level rather than just the selection.
Now I've corrected all tags.
thank you
32017-08-05 17:33:46 UTCmueschel They are still there: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qPu
12017-08-04 16:50:24 UTCGinaroZ I think mot is correct, as it offers an MOT service?
22017-08-04 17:40:28 UTCmueschel Shouldn't it be amenity=vehicle_inspection or service:vehicle:inspection=yes then? The first is documented and used 800 times, the latter is used 30 times.
32017-08-05 13:14:28 UTCSomeoneElse Something involving MOT would make perfect sense to me - see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=mot#keys and http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=mot#values for where it's been used before. "inspection" is hardly used for MOTs; see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/sea...
42017-08-05 13:49:16 UTCmueschel I'm not from the UK, so I didn't hear the term MOT before.
But as far as I see, these tags involving the term MOT are used maybe 50 times in the UK, while all the rest of Europe has the tag amenity=vehicle_inspection used 1300 times. This tag is supported in JOSM and shown e.g. in Osmand as well.
...
12017-08-04 15:23:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way, it has foreign tags only:
http://osm.org/way/511262268

12017-08-03 16:17:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
most of these nodes have only foreign tags which don't look like they should appear in the OSM database, can you check this?

Btw, what is the precise license of this data? Pure cc-by is not compatible with ODbL!
22017-08-03 16:29:25 UTCStefano baldissera Licenza d'uso CC-BY 2.5 fonte dati SITAD REGIONE PIEMONTE . http://www.sistemapiemonte.it/serviziositad/index.shtml

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/it/
32017-08-04 21:44:42 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50850714.
12017-08-02 19:05:38 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM. Was genau möchtest du hier mappen? Damit Software etwas mit den Informationen anfangen kann, müssen die Tags genau so wie im Wiki beschrieben benutzt werden. Wirf doch mal einen Blick auf Parkplätze und E-Tankstellen.
Bei Fragen hilft man dir im Forum ger...
22017-08-03 15:32:13 UTCNakaner Hallo Jan,

der Rest der Beiträge dieses Benutzers scheint auch größtenteils nicht von ernsthafter Natur zu sein. Ich habe es mir im Detail aber nicht angesehen und habe nicht die Zeit, mich darum zu kümmern.

Viele Grüße

Michael
12017-08-01 19:21:48 UTCmueschel Kannst du die ganzen 'capacity' tags an diesem und anderen Nodes überprüfen? Für die Leistung gibt es 'power' als Tag.

Gruß, Jan
22017-08-02 14:23:38 UTCbusch19 Danke für den Hinweis (bin neu). Habe es geändert.

Steffen
32017-08-02 18:22:47 UTCmueschel Das hatte ich gar nicht gesehen... Dann nachträglich noch: herzlich willkommen bei OSM! Zögere nicht dich zum Beispiel im Forum zu melden wenn du Fragen hast.
12017-08-01 19:45:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
could uou check the roads you added here?
15 of them have only strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511074247
12017-08-01 19:42:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the nodes you added, some have tags like
ADDRESS=1810 J 6/10 Rd, Fruita, 81521
PUB_PRI2=Public
STREET_TYP=Rd

This looks like a mistake.
12017-08-01 19:34:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
please be a bit careful when uploading changes - I found two relations where you changed an exisying key to 'ы'
22017-08-02 07:39:46 UTCmisht Ok, I'm sorry. Accidentally.
12017-08-01 19:16:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
63 ways got the tag 'wip_remove_me' - was this a mistake?
Cheers, Jan
22017-08-01 21:11:49 UTCM!dgard Uh yes, I added that to be able to conveniently select the ways I had to change, and I forgot to remove them. Fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/50764793. Thanks for the heads-up!
12017-07-31 15:45:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain all the name tags of this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4858193412
I doubt it has this name with '3.5 t'
22017-08-01 07:13:29 UTCJay May Hi :)
Sure! This is for people using OSM-based GPS apps (ex.: maps.me) to know which lane is for regular cars (≤3.5t meaning “for vehicles with a weight up to 3,5 tons), and which one is for trucks (TIR, abbreviation of Transport International Routier, is understood by every truck driver u...
32017-08-01 14:30:29 UTCmueschel We do have a clear policy that the name tag contains just the actual name and does not contain any description. For this you can use tags like maxweight or hgv. If tools like maps.me do not support this, request them to adapt to common OSM tagging rules.
42017-08-01 17:40:00 UTCJay May One question: what will it change for OSM if those border control tagged names are not visible to regular OSM users anyway?
52017-08-01 18:15:40 UTCmueschel Who is a "regular osm user"? There are hundreds of different maps and tools around. All of them render different things. And for example searching for names gets increasingly difficult if we add arbitrary information to the name tag.
62017-08-01 18:52:38 UTCJay May I'm afraid this is not arbitrary info. It is useful info, otherwise I wouldn't waste my time to look for it and reflect it on OSM. Rules are there as an indication, and may sometimes be wrong Some of them must be changed.
You state the policy on names it clear. I'm afraid it isn't. There are a cou...
12017-07-30 16:05:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 12 objects in your uploads with many foreign keys and no common OSM tags. Could you have a look and fix these?
Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510975694

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-30 16:03:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
most of the information you added does not use common tags. Spelling and Upper/Lower case matters a lot for software to be able to interpret these tags, e.g.
name instead of NAME
name:ar instead of Name_ar
place instead of Place
and so on. Could you please fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-30 15:45:15 UTCmueschel Please be careful what you upload to OSM. It's the second time I'm deleting tags like these:
Simon = Weak
Michael = Strong
Peter = Above Average
(I removed the user names you had there)
12017-07-30 15:37:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
some of the nodes have many foreign tags, could you check that? E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5002215004

Ja
22017-08-01 18:46:51 UTCAlan Bragg Thanks for catching that error and notifying me. I found that I had another similar error which I have corrected.
12017-07-16 13:11:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "access:coach =discouraged" in this changeset. This tag has not been used in other places yet.
I guess the common tag "tourist_bus = discouraged" is what you want to use here?

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-29 11:13:46 UTCgurglypipe Not really. The tagging is meant to reflect a road sign which says “Not suitable for coaches”. The tagging documentation I was following is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddiscouraged.
32017-07-29 12:40:46 UTCmueschel 'access:' is never a part of those keys. And osm knows two types of busses: bus and tourist_bus. Both are described on the wiki page you linked to. The 'discouraged' part is perfectly fine.
42017-07-29 13:04:36 UTCgurglypipe I was following the example of `access:bicycle=yes` (from that page). I guess the intention of the road sign could be encoded as `bus=discouraged`, `tourist_bus=discouraged`? The sign is probably more targeting the length and wheel base of the vehicles rather than their use as PSVs or multi-person v...
52017-07-29 14:07:38 UTCmueschel I don't know why this is listed there. The correct tag is 'bicycle' and is used 10000 times more often (300 vs 3 million uses)
62017-07-29 16:23:55 UTCgurglypipe OK, changed to bus=discouraged tourist_bus=discouraged in changeset #50675680. I’m not sure if I got all the instances of it, since I can’t get overpass to list any access:coach instances. (I’m obviously using it wrongly.)
72017-07-29 16:41:19 UTCmueschel Goto overpass-turbo.eu, Open the wizard and type 'access:coach=* global', click run. There is nothing left.
82017-07-30 08:07:26 UTCgurglypipe Great, thanks
12017-07-27 10:37:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tracktype tag of this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509577193

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-27 11:25:12 UTCwajak corrected. Thanks
12017-07-27 10:32:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
it's preferred to use the key 'alt_name' instead of 'name_1' - alt_name can be searched for (e.g. in the search box on osm.org) while most tools do not support name_1.

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-27 06:16:29 UTCcalfarome Hello Kyaw Htet Aung,
Thank you for your map edits, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
What is the source of this data that you are adding?, it seems that each of the points you added has its duplicates to the side and that is inconsistent for OpenStreetMap.
Could you please explain what happening i...
22017-07-27 08:32:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
it also looks like there are many tags copied from the source without changing them to common OSM standards. E.g. these tags should not appear in OSM

Shape_Area=0.00606869668746
Shape_Leng=0.57835062104
lat=16.850959
lng=96.162165

And, for example name tags in different languages have ...
32017-07-29 21:30:33 UTCrene78 Time to revert?
12017-07-26 15:59:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong here.
There are 160 nodes on the same spot, all with a lot of foreign tags which don't look like they belong to OSM:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4990832927

Jan
22017-07-26 16:02:00 UTCmueschel PS: I doubt that these lights are 4.5 km high. 'height' uses meter as units, not millimeters.
32017-07-28 13:58:06 UTCdidier2020 i fix height in this changeset 50650261
42017-08-08 14:20:20 UTCArjanO I guess something went wrong with an import.
Point taken.

best regards,
Arjano
12017-07-26 12:38:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
das tag 'vtm = yes' - soll das 'atm' heißen?
Gruß, Jan
22017-07-26 13:28:20 UTCFuss-im-Ohr jetzt hab ich schon einen Note angefügt.....
32017-07-26 13:29:49 UTCFuss-im-Ohr dafür stimmt aber die FaxNr nicht ganz, das merkt natürlich keiner :-)
42017-07-26 13:35:26 UTCmueschel Das übersieht man durchaus, vor allem wenn da nur ein Link steht und keine Erklärung. Da es sich um eine Bezahlmethode handelt, sollte der Tag wohl 'payment:vtm = yes' heißen, besser noch payment:vtm-fair, damit es eindeutiger zugeordnet ist.
52017-07-26 13:42:54 UTCFuss-im-Ohr das macht sogar Sinn, da es noch ein "neuer" Tag ist müsste man es im Wiki auch mal zur Diskussion stellen. Im IRC gab es noch keine Meinung dazu
62017-07-26 13:53:44 UTCmueschel Du kannst es einfach hier eintragen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:payment#Tankkarten
Das Tagging-Schema ist ja etabliert, da braucht es meiner Meinung nach keine Diskussion.
12017-07-25 11:27:01 UTCmueschel Was meinst du denn mit "scheduled"? Üblicherweise nehmen wir doch preproposed / proposed / planned / construction.
Gruß, Jan
22017-07-27 21:51:51 UTCJojo4u Ich dachte ich mache nochmal Werbung für mein scheduled-Proposal. Aber jetzt am Desktop sehe ich bei Taginfo nur 2 Objekte. Aber planned wird ja auch noch nicht gerendert...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Scheduled_lifecycle
12017-07-23 09:06:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
this changeset contains 24 times the tag "farrmland", note the spelling mistake.
Could you have a look and fix it?
Cheers, Jan
22017-07-23 10:47:03 UTCMichaelCollinson Jan, Thanks for pointing that out. Yes, I will fix it.
12017-07-23 09:04:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some ways with these tags:
edited=true
import=yes
I guess these are not needed and can be removed?

Jan
22017-07-25 23:56:37 UTCVLD009 Hi Jan,
Thank you for your message! The import=yes is used to tag our contributions. This is further explained in the wiki [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing] where our process is documented. The edited=true tag is an internal tag and is not needed - we removed the tag. Th...
12017-07-23 09:01:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tags on some of the buildings?
These look rather strange to me:
ww=1
ww3=1

And, "signage=Korean" - this is not common in OSM, what do you want to describe with this tag?

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-23 11:28:06 UTCWei Wu Hi,
Sorry for making you confused, we're now working on a project about Korean-Chinese isolation in Garibong-dong based on the usages and signage of buildings.
Signage-Korean means these commercial buildings only have Korean signs, and we also marked other buildings as Korean-Chinese or Korean -En...
12017-07-23 09:00:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain how you added these huge landuse areas? According to satellite images, they don't seem to be correct. For example, there is a larger town in one of your landuse=farmland and vice versa.

Additionally, you used the unknown keys "Eneo" and "Matumizi". Can ...
12017-07-23 08:55:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
on these trees I found several tags which are not common in OSM - maybe you can have a look and find more common ones?
Cheers, Jan

animate=yes
area=not applicable
established=1988-12-02
sign=improperly
size=not applicable
vitality=3
22017-07-23 09:40:57 UTCwmyrda All those tags in few minor chageset have their actual meaning which is a preparation of much larger data set from polish national registry of nature preservation. There is discussion in polish subforum about it https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=656206#p656206 I have explained there...
12017-07-22 12:47:47 UTCSK53 I wonder if the Carshalton Beeches should be promoted to a suburb with places like Carshalton-on-the-Hill as neighbourhoods. When I lived & worked around here 'Barrow Hedges catchment' was the key divide for Carshalton Beeches. The dividing line to N is a bit hard to pick out (everything S of ra...
22017-07-22 13:46:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
I don't know this area nor the situation - I just changed your "note_for_wikipedians" to the common "note" key so that editors are able to show it to other mappers.
12017-07-22 12:06:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
please have a look to the Wiki on how to map traffic signs:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-20 11:04:09 UTCmueschel ... and another set of 852 wrong address tags.
22017-07-20 14:35:28 UTCAndrew Matheny Fixed! Thank you
12017-07-18 11:12:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
Something went wrong here - you added your user name to 49 trees as a tag, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4973522973

Could you have a look?
Jan
22017-07-18 12:47:05 UTCRayhan Hossen Hi Jan,

Thanks for your message.

I've just checked that changesets and yes, you're right. I don't have any clear idea but somehow I added my username as a tag on those trees. I'm gonna delete those tags.

Thanks a lot!

Regards,
Rayhan Hossen
12017-07-18 10:45:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the maxspeed on this way? Looks like a spelling mistake.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507556776

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-18 11:02:35 UTCAnonix35 It's corrected. Small error
12017-07-17 12:07:00 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was stellt dieser Knoten da? perch = yes und name = Perch sind leider keine Beschreibung, die in OSM gebräuchlich sind. Schau doch mal ins Wiki, wie überlicherweise getagged wird - oder beschreibe das Objekt hier genauer, dann kann ich weiterhelfen.
Gruß, Jan
12017-07-16 11:32:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added a strange tag on 97 objects:
"tourism=apartment=16"
Did you mean rooms = 16 or number_of_apartments = 16?

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-17 06:35:26 UTCAmbush Hi Jan,
it was a mistake, roomer wanted to set addr:housenumber = 16, but something went wrong =)

I've fixed it.

WBR, Pavel
12017-07-15 10:30:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these shapes? They don't have any valid tags. For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506808224

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-15 10:41:46 UTCgetBounds Thanks not sure what happened here. I think these are supposed to be holes in the park polygon. I'll have to check. I assume I can cut holes in polygons in iD?
12017-07-15 10:28:04 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM!
you added these tags to a node:
Acera ampliada = si
Alta visibilidad = si
Isleta o zona protegida = no
Rampa en linea con el cruce = si
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4962761018

This might be a good description of the object, but is not understood by any OSM-b...
12017-07-14 10:42:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
this stream as 18 foreign keys which don't look like they should appear in the OSM database. Could you have a look?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506460710

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-13 20:01:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some ways with strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506883545
Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan
22017-07-13 21:01:10 UTCChristianA Haha, the road data came from an open dataset from the Swedish road administration. I forgot to change the attributes from some of the roads. I will fix it.
32017-07-13 21:16:08 UTCChristianA How can I find all roads that have the bad data?
42017-07-14 08:21:55 UTCmueschel You can use overpass-turbo and its Wizard:

http://overpass-turbo.eu?w=STARTAVST=*+global

Looks like there is only one way left:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506288954
12017-07-12 11:28:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of the name of this street (and its second part)?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233256198

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-12 11:11:13 UTCmueschel Hi,
when mapping service times, you don't need to use several tags for all the days. They can be combined into one:
service_times=So 07:30; 10:00; 19:00
service_times_1=Sat 19:00
service_times_2=Fr 19:30
service_times_3=Wed 15:00

service_times = Su 07:30, 10:00, 19:00; Sa 19:00; Fr 19:30; We...
22017-07-12 21:46:54 UTCAjBelnuovo Jan , ok , obrigado pelas informações . Vou editar como de acordo com as informações que me enviou.

Abraços , Airton
12017-07-10 08:05:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? The tag 70 = 90 looks strange.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505304853

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-10 08:19:25 UTCSenbee Just corrected. Thank you.
Cheers, Stefano
12017-07-10 07:01:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many points with tags like these:
BLOCK_No \t017
HOUSE_No \tPNB BANK
WARD_No \t51
ZONE_No \tZONE-D
Unfortunately, this information can not be used by any OSM tool or map. Please have a look to the wiki how addresses have to mapped so that they can be found and shown:
https://wik...
22017-07-10 23:23:44 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
12017-07-10 06:58:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check some other mapped areas to find out how streets are commonly mapped in OSM. Drawing the outline of the road might look nice in some map, but is otherwise rather useless.
If you have questions, feel free to contact the OSM community!
22017-07-10 23:23:45 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
12017-07-10 06:29:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
are there really 90 hotels with the same name in this city?
22017-07-10 23:23:41 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
12017-07-09 14:18:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of "disabled_vehicle=no"?
http://osm.org/way/505049343 and 2 more
Cheers, Jan
22017-07-09 16:16:59 UTCAllroads Hello,
You find it ;-), this recently added tag. Because of a traffic sign.
Netherlands traffic_signs https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden#C:_Geslotenverklaring
says at C9 or C13 or C14 or C15.

"gehandicaptenvoertuigen" a "voertuíg...
32017-07-09 17:19:48 UTCmueschel Alright. Looked like a mistake to me, not knowing the details.
12017-07-09 14:29:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check the tagging of some of the nodes - they all have tags which don't look like they belong to OSM. For example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505332377

Jan
12017-07-09 14:26:02 UTCmueschel Hier stimmt etwas nicht mit der direction:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4950394110
22017-07-10 07:37:42 UTCLoneship Danke für den Hinweis, habe es korrigiert.
12017-07-09 14:24:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node? I guess something went wrong with the name tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4950931435
Cheers, Jan
12017-07-09 14:22:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these rooms? They have many tags which don't look like they should appear in OSM, for example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505040179

chinese_t = 312演藝廳
english = auditorium
label = 演藝廳
navi = true
show_label = true
show_region...
12017-07-09 13:56:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

Please keep in mind that the correct spelling of tags is very important in OSM - otherwise software can not understand the meaning. E.g. this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505828897
There must be no capital letters ("Yes", "Wheelchair", "Wid...
22017-07-10 12:24:23 UTCvirvv Hello Jan,

Thank you very much for your comments.

Regards

Vir
12017-07-06 08:36:37 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du gibst bei deinen Ergänzungen von Hofläden verschiedene Webseiten als Quelle an. Ich habe mehrere davon überprüft und auf keiner einen Hinweis gefunden, dass die Daten frei verwendet werden dürfen. In OSM dürfen nur Daten eingetragen werden, deren Lizenz kompa...
22017-07-07 09:53:03 UTCmartindick56 Hallo "mueschel",
Vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Würde das nun heissen, dass alle Webseiten-Verweise gelöscht werden müssten? Und wie steht es mit den anderen Informationen zu den erwähnten Hofläden, welche z.B. von Telsearch stammen?
Natürlich kö...
32017-07-07 11:15:12 UTCmueschel Ich weiß es nicht, aber ich fürchte, dass telesearch da durchaus eine Klausel in den Nutzungsbedingungen hat, die nur die persönliche Nutzung erlaubt, aber nicht die kommerzielle Weitergabe. (OSM selbst ist zwar nicht kommerziell, aber die Daten dürfen dann auch für kommerz...
42017-07-07 12:34:02 UTCmartindick56 Schön, das ganze scheint sich noch weiter zu komplizieren...
Schau mal auf der webseite www.anhbl.ch nach. Dort habe ich alle Organisationen und Körperschaften (Gemeinden, Bürgergemeinden, Naturschutzorganisationen, Stiftungen, alles was im engeren und weiteren Sinn mit Natur- und He...
52017-07-08 08:00:49 UTCSimonPoole Einzelne Informationen von den Webseiten der Objekte (den Hofläden) zu übernehmen ist wohl weitestgehend problemlos, was aber nicht geht, ist ohne Erlaubnis Verzeichnisse und Sammlungen solcher Informationen zu nutzen ohne Erlaubnis (die Ersteller solcher Verzeichnisse haben ja meistens au...
62017-07-11 13:02:29 UTCmartindick56 Lieber Simon,
Ich werde bei den Verzeichnis-Anbietern (es sind etwa 10 verschiedene) nachfragen und bei fehlender Erlaubnis ihren Eintrag unter Source löschen.

Freundliche Grüsse
Martin
72017-07-11 19:45:53 UTCmartindick56 Hallo zusammen,
Inzwischen habe ich bei https://www.falstaff.at nachgefragt und per Mail die Erlaubnis gekriegt, diese Daten für Kartierungen zu nutzen. Wo soll diese Information abgelegt werden. Weiss jemad darüber Bescheid?
12017-07-05 11:28:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
the key "bike_friend" has not been used anywhere in OSM so far. I guess you mean "motorcycle_friendly" - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Amotorcycle_friendly

And: Please don't forget to add comments to changesets!

Jan
22017-07-05 12:43:43 UTCHammershoej Hi,
bike_friend is a new tag. It is used to show that the location in question is registered as bike friendly. It is a programme offered by the local tourist organisation for Southern Funen:
http://www.visitsvendborg.dk/denmark/vil-du-vaere-bike-friend

It is on my to-do list to write documentat...
32017-07-05 12:46:23 UTCHammershoej As to writing changeset comments, I admit to skipping. This is a limit to both Potlatch and iD. It simply takes too much time when there is a seperate changeset for each of 90 changes. Problem is that for each point I have to return to the main page, search for the location and then edit. I can't do...
42017-07-05 12:49:23 UTCmueschel The term "bike" is not used in OSM because it is ambiguous - it could be motorcycle of bicycle. i suggest to follow the existing tagging scheme of "motorcycle_friendly" and use "bicycle_friendly".

Apart from that, if you add data from an external source, you have to ...
52017-07-05 13:52:07 UTCHammershoej License: I know this of cause and have cleared it before starting.

As to naming, I see your point, but I also find it counter-intuitive to tag a programme called 'Bike Friend' as 'cycle_friend'.

Please hold your horses and questions until I have written the documentation.
12017-07-05 11:35:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this object? You changed the park to a huge highway. I guess this was a mistake...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6148865/history

Cheers, Jan
12017-07-03 10:50:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
I understand that it is important to collect information about emergency plans. But I don't think it helps to add hundreds of nodes without any meaningful tag. This data is just in the database, but no tool will be able to find these nodes or display them in any meaningful way.
22017-07-03 11:28:58 UTCbsmith54 Hi,
Thank you so much for catching this! I'm working on a project in collaboration with the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, and completely missed this (incredibly important!) observation. I'll make sure to go back and update those nodes appropriately. Any additional insights you have would ...
12017-07-03 09:02:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
did you really want to add this huge amount of foreign tags to ways like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105028180

Jan
22017-07-03 11:32:41 UTCLogicalViolinist No I didnt sorry about that. I'll get it corrected when I have access to a computer. Thanks for spotting it.
32017-07-04 14:44:31 UTCLogicalViolinist I've corrected the issues. Thank you for pointing it out.
12017-07-02 14:08:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added a strange tag to the three lifts here:
abandoned:aerialway=drag_lift = forest
Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-02 21:37:59 UTCSembola Corrected, I really don't know what happened...
Thanks for checking
12017-07-02 13:59:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
sure you can add the name in any language. You have to find the 3-letter code of the language (wikipedia is very helpful) and add it to the name key.
If it's not a language, but just a different name, you can use e.g. old_name or loc_name keys.

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-09 18:22:15 UTCSupaplex 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯! 歡迎加入開放街圖,群眾共同參與,繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料,歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ta...
12017-07-02 13:54:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of tags. I just fixed several:
addr:sity -> addr:city,
nameaddr:housenumber -> addr:housenumber
I don't know if I catched all, please check.

Jan
12017-07-01 10:36:53 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was hat es mit dem Key "ref (OHA)" auf sich, das du hier benutzt? Hat sich die Straßennummer geändert, dann ist der Platz für die alte Nummer der Key "old_ref". Und gib bitte in deinen Changesets auch die Quelle der Änderungen und einen Kommentar an.\...
22017-07-01 15:00:34 UTCdocschenk Hallo Jan, grundsätzlich ist mir bekannt, dass old_ref der richtige Key wäre. Nur was macht man, wenn der reif öfter wechselt? Der Landkreis Osterode hat mit Göttingen fusioniert, alle Kreisstraßen des Altkreises OHA bekommen jetzt eine 400er Nummer (7 -> 407 usw.). Da d...
32017-07-01 17:12:05 UTCmueschel Ich würde diese Information weglassen. old_ref akzeptiert auch mehrere Werte, getrennt durch ";". Wenn du den OHA noch erwähnen willst, geht etwas wie
old_ref:OHA, das benutzt die übliche Syntax eines namespaces. Das würde ich aber nur zusätzlich zum gängigen...
12017-07-01 09:38:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
in this edit you used some keys like these to map destinations:
colour:back:backward
colour:text:backward
direction:backward

Typically, other keys are used, like 'destination' and 'destination:colour'. Could you have a look and adapt to this scheme? Here is a Wiki page with some examples:...
12017-07-01 09:25:04 UTCmueschel Could you check this import as well? These tags don't look they belong to OSM:

J_DESC=2.1.1.1 - prevalentemente seminativi senza vegetazione sparsa
area_mq=291039.54
clc_lvl1=2
clc_lvl2=21
clc_lvl3=211
clc_lvl4=2111
id=1199
isolati_ID=143
tipo_area=Non ...
12017-07-01 09:22:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like something went wrong with this import of buildings: They all have tags which should not appear in the OSM database. Could you check this?
E.g.
altezza=2.81
id=2521
isolati_ID=136
layer=0207I-Tettoia O Pensilina Invariato
superficie=168.65
tipoedific=...
12017-06-30 12:58:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
was heißt denn "maxbreight"? Vielleicht maxwidth?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4934180080

Gruß, Jan
22017-07-01 07:47:19 UTCgekapes Hi Jan,

danke, dass Du es gesehen hast. Ich habe schon ausgebessert.
Ich weiss selber nicht, wieso ich es so getaggt habe.

Gruss,
Jeka
12017-06-29 21:07:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several objects with many strange tags. None of them is a tag we typically use. For example this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502831987

Could you have a look and revise the tagging to use common tags?
Cheers, Jan
22017-07-10 23:23:46 UTCSomeoneElse_Revert This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
12017-06-29 07:48:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

you added several points with information about the number of inhabitants. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. Also, our database in case sensitive, all keys have to be in lower case...
12017-06-28 11:44:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, it has many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4930534149

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-28 07:38:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "dbh" on these nodes. It is not used anywhere else up to now - what is meaning of this key?
22017-07-07 17:42:52 UTCUndearius I suppose late is better than never.
DBH is Diameter at Breast Height.
It was part of an ongoing discussion on the import mailing list and has since been converted to circumference.
These nodes will be deleted and replaced with the proper ones.
12017-06-28 07:37:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
all of these ways have many tags which don't seem to belong to the OSM database, e.g.:

date=no
full_id=w667896
ispaved=True
osm_id=667896
osm_type=way
telenav_cy=CHANGED
22017-06-28 12:22:34 UTCioanam_telenav Hello!
Sorry, it was my mistake. I have changed and uploaded the tags according to the OSM database.
32017-06-28 13:19:54 UTCioanam_telenav I have worked on a specific data set and I have accidentally uploaded it. But I have deleted everything that has mistakenly been uploaded. Now it should be fine.
12017-06-27 13:17:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. You added a lot of points here, but none of them has any meaningful tags. Please take your time to read in the OSM Wiki how tagging has to be done to be useful in any application that uses OSM data.
12017-06-27 11:32:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Tag "lanes2" schauen? Scheint mir eher eine destination in irgendeine Richtung zu sein. Und 'maxspeed:source' sollte eher 'source:maxspeed' heißen.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353516976
Gruß, Jan
12017-06-26 10:34:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
ich habe hier an einigen Knoten Tippfehler korrigiert (sowas wie 'newtork' oder 'public_tranport'). Ich weiß nicht, ob ich alle erwischt habe, vielleicht kannst du auch nochmal drüberschauen. Gruß, Jan
22017-06-26 10:43:39 UTCHairyCoo Danke für deine Aufmerksamkeit! Ich werde noch mal überprüfen! MfG HairyCoo
12017-06-25 17:15:13 UTCmueschel Woher stammt die Information, dass das hier die K246 ist? Schilder habe ich da bis jetzt noch keine sehen können.
22017-06-25 18:56:46 UTCfurban das habe ich wohl hier gelesen https://www.karben.de/rathaus-buergerservice/projekte/nordumgehung/
32017-06-25 19:05:44 UTCTourenbikerFKB http://www.deges.de/Startseite/L-3351-Ortsumgehung-Karben-eroeffnet-E1440.htm

Hier wird sie als L3351. Die frühere L3351 durch den Ortskern wurde zurückgestuft.

Am besten mal bei Hessen Mobil erkundigen.
42017-06-25 19:06:28 UTCTourenbikerFKB ...soll heißen: mit L3351 bezeichnet.
52017-06-25 20:27:01 UTCmueschel Genau, sie soll die L3351 werden. Habe aber keine Beschilderung gesehen, dass das schon passiert ist.
62017-06-26 06:03:28 UTCfurban Dann bau es doch um. Kann man ja immer noch wieder anders machen. Aber es klingt ja nur logisch das diese Straße eher mal ein Lxxx als ein Kxxx sein sollte.
12017-06-25 18:11:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "lcr_ref" to several roads - did you mean "lcn_ref"?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-25 18:16:55 UTCSebastianPlesko yes. i'm going to soon remove it anyway and make "relations" instead. i finally got a map from the local municipality (was really hard to find) where exactly the bicycle paths go.
12017-06-24 20:25:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "ScientificName" on some nodes - in OSM we have the tag "species" (as well as "genus") for that. If you want to tag the English name of the species, you can use "species:en".

Jan
22017-06-29 22:21:06 UTCSK53 Also the key taxon (effectively synonymous with species a lot of the time, but most useful when cultivars come into play as with many stree trees)
12017-06-24 20:15:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
Kannst du hier nochmal nach dem payment-Tag schauen? Mit eckigen Klammern kann man da wohl nicht bezahlen :-)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4917650794
22017-06-24 20:18:52 UTCtbm Fixed, thanks!
12017-06-24 20:10:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way just got one strange tag and is missing an "highway" Tag. Could you have a look?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500714135

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-24 18:22:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - too many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502976662
Cheers, Jan
22017-08-16 19:49:21 UTCnaoliv realkaka, esses dados que você utilizou aqui são de onde, por favor?
32017-08-16 20:08:48 UTCrealkaka naoliv, dos setores censitários do IBGE.
42017-08-16 20:12:25 UTCnaoliv Beleza. Valeu!
12017-06-23 18:44:45 UTCmueschel Die Linie 74 hält in Vilbel weder am Bussteig A noch B, sondern ausschließlich an E. Sie war allerdings absichtlich nicht eingetragen, weil es sich dabei nur um 2 Schülerfahrten pro Schultag handelt, und wir solche Schulbusse oft gar nicht erfassen.
22017-06-24 19:27:36 UTCTetiSoft Danke für die Info, habe Linie 74 (die vorher übrigens schon eingetragen war aber IIRC ab Heinrich-Heine-Straße statt Bahnhof fuhr) korrigiert. Habe auch ref und local_ref für die Haltepositionen am Bahnhof gesetzt.
12017-06-23 13:03:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
das Tag hier sieht merkwürdig aus...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2313608108

Gruß, Jan
12017-06-23 12:50:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check the tagging. Email, Phone and Website are no valid keys in OSM.
Also, please don't misuse the description tag for extended advertising texts.
22017-06-28 09:40:20 UTCHilton Hotels Thank you for turning our attention to the wrongly entered tags. All of this has been fixed. Thank you once again.
12017-06-23 12:42:22 UTCmueschel Could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39437968
'maxspeed:f' is not a valid tag.
22017-06-26 06:13:16 UTCalinan_telenav Hello,
Thank you for pointing this out for me. I changed the tag.
Have a nice day,
Alina
12017-06-23 12:41:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
could you explain the meaning of the tags you added here? I don't fully see what you want to express and in the current state it also can not be interpreted by software.
You could have a look to the wiki to see how bus stops are currently mapped.
12017-06-23 12:14:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
the 198 objects you added here contain some rather strange tags:
CODE=WALL
COLOUR_NU=16
GROUP=BuildingL
LENGTH=22.406
NUMBER=1025
TYPE=Line
Where these added by mistake or is there some useful information contained?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-22 08:54:02 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du gibst hier als Quelle ein Buch an - hast du eine schriftliche Genehmigung, diese Daten in OSM zu übernehmen? Die Lizenz unter der Quellen stehen, muss mit der ODbL von OSM kompatibel sein.
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-22 14:37:54 UTCosm_Ralef Hallo Jan,
ich war etwas blauäugig, diese Infos so einzustellen. Bin nicht davon ausgegangen, das die hier schon urherberrechtlich interessant ist, da nur kurze Auszüge mit Quellenangabe. Eine Genehmigung wird auch schwierig, da der Verfasser leider 2001 verstorben ist.

Ich werde alle ...
12017-06-21 20:42:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "litname = no". Did you mean "lit=no"?
www.openstreetmap.org/way/483249177
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-22 14:27:31 UTCLowe253 Hi, mueschel

you guessed right. Already fixed.

Thanks
12017-06-21 20:23:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
between 6th and 7th street you created 3 overlapping roads. Could you check and fix that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-21 19:39:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of this tag?
ata_delete:construction \t2017-06-30
on node http://osm.org/node/2499396427

If there is some temporary construction, it's best to use the "temporary" prefix or "conditional" suffix, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_fea...
12017-06-21 12:36:20 UTCmueschel Hi,
dieser Tag hier stimmt leider auch nicht so ganz:
"access:agricultural:forward:conditional =\tnone @ maxweight"
Keine Gewichtsbeschränkung für landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge wäre

maxweight:forward:conditional = none @ agricultural

Grüße, Jan
22017-06-21 18:30:23 UTCProtoxenus habs geändert......
12017-06-20 21:22:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tags "moped_p" and "moped_a" in this changeset. These are not used very often - moped_P and moped_A are used more often. Could you adapt to this more common spelling of the keys?
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-21 11:53:04 UTCM!dgard Hi Jan

Tags with capital letters don't fit in with the other tags. For example for emergency=aed it was voted explicitly to use lowercase.

I'm aware that moped_A is more popular at the moment, but unless it is standardized to use uppercase (there're only two mentions about it in the wiki, no d...
32017-06-21 12:27:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're right, upper case keys are rare. But looking at the statistics, we have e.g. 550 moped_A, but only 30 moped_a. In my opinion, the best way is to first adopt the more common scheme and in parallel start a discussion in the local community. Then we can do an automated retagging once there ...
42017-06-21 12:39:33 UTCM!dgard (Erratum: it was voted as emergency=defibrillator, not aed, but the vote for the lowercase option got significantly more votes than the uppercase one.)
52017-06-21 12:59:28 UTCM!dgard > the best way is to first adopt the more common scheme and in parallel start a discussion in the local community

The problem is that the discussion will cite usage numbers, they are one of the metrics that are used to do an informal vote. I don't support that though, those are too easily infl...
62017-06-21 13:08:28 UTCM!dgard Matching some more different combinations with the mopeds:

Uppercase: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pVA 706 ways
Lowercase: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pVB 379 ways

So the difference is definitely not an order of magnitude.
12017-06-20 21:30:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
du nutzt hier die Tags
maxweight:lanes:left=12t
mindistance:hgv:lanes:right=50m
Das Suffix :left bzw. :right ist in diesem Zusammenhang nicht definiert - was möchtest du ausdrücken?
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-21 07:27:24 UTCProtoxenus Die Brücke ist so um die 50 Jahre alt und nicht für das andauernde Befahren mit 40t-LKW konstruiert. Deshalb gibt es eine Einschränkung: linker Fahrstreifen Fahrzeuge mit maximal 12t, rechter Fahrstreifen mit minimalem Abstand von 50m für LKW. Das habe ich versucht, umzusetzen.
32017-06-21 07:32:21 UTCmueschel Alles klar, das würde dann so aussehen:
maxweight:lanes = 12t |
mindistance:hgv:lanes = | 50
Bei ":lanes" werden einfach die Eigenschaften aller Spuren aufgezählt, von links nach rechts, getrennt mit "|", Spuren ohne Eigenschaften bleiben leer.
42017-06-21 07:35:38 UTCProtoxenus Ok, daran hatte ich nicht gedacht. Danke für den Hinweis.
12017-06-11 09:18:30 UTCwhb Was bedeutet denn "2017 = 4 km/h"?
z.B. hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118342708
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60175718
22017-06-13 16:07:51 UTCdornweg Was "2017 = 4 km/h" bedeutet würde mich auch interessieren. Der Eintrag war schon vorhanden, und ich wollte ihn nicht einfach löschen.
32017-06-20 19:59:36 UTCmueschel Da muss ich dich leider enttäuschen, den Tag gibt es erst seit diesem Changeset. Ich lösche ihn dann mal.
12017-06-20 11:10:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found a speling mistake on 43 ways: area:higway instead of area:highway - could you have a look and fix it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-20 19:50:29 UTCCiemek Hi
I corrected spelling mistakes
12017-06-20 11:08:19 UTCmueschel Please stop adding new objects and sort out your spelling mistakes. Most of the data you added is completely useless because of spelling mistakes. It's likely we have to fully delete it because it would take days to clean everything up by hand.
12017-06-19 10:56:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many objects with foreign tags which don't look like they should appear in OSM data, e.g.
ALAND=0
AWATER=433
HYDROID=110783668525
INTPTLAT=+35.5385696
INTPTLON=-93.4273783
MTFCC=H2030

Could you have a look and clean this up?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-19 10:48:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw you added the tag "width:parking:lane:both" on several ways. This tag is not used in any other place up to now. In other places, the tag is "parking:lane:both:width". Could you change this to the common tag?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-21 04:13:55 UTCtheangrytomato Whoops, sorry about that. Should have it fixed tonight!
Bradley
12017-06-19 10:20:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
please check all your tagging of nodes for correctness. Spelling is very important! Most of these tags with spelling mistakes were added by you and can not be used at all in OSM:

add: city\t
add:city\t
add:place\t
add:street\t
addr : city\t
addr : street\t
Addr:\t
Addr: city\t...
12017-06-17 08:13:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
du hast hier Tags wie 'roadbike-smoothness', 'roadbike:soothness' und 'roadbike:smoothness' hinzugefügt, jeweils etwa 80 Mal.
Diese Tags gibt es bisher nicht, und sie entsprechen auch nicht den üblichen Taggingregeln.
a) 2 davon haben Schreibfehler, das letzte ist das korrekteste.
...
22017-06-17 08:46:06 UTCmatchman Hallo Jan,
ähnlich dem mtb:scale tag geht es mir darum die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit aus der Sicht eines Rennradfahrers darzustellen und diese zu klassifizieren. Der smoothness key ist hierfür leider nicht präzise genug.
Ich würde den key in smoothness:roadbike ändern...
32017-06-19 08:51:30 UTCmueschel Ok. Eine Dokumentation in Form eines Proposals sollte es dann schon geben. Am besten natürlich gleich mit Blick auf alle möglichen Verkehrsteilnehmer, nicht nur auf Radfahrer bezogen.
12017-06-17 18:07:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of tags. Only correctly spelled tags can be used by OSM software.
E.g. I found 40 objects with the tag 'operater', which should read 'operator'.
I didn't check all your edits, but I also found a "amenity=post office" which should be "amenity=po...
12017-06-17 18:03:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found you added several objects with strange tags, like these:
open space =yes
play ground =godwari-14,makhu boou
This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look to the wiki about common
tags for shops or am...
12017-06-16 18:05:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcomr to OSM! Please watch out for the spelling of tags, it's "building", "addr:city" and 'colour'. I corrected some of these,but maybe I missed a few.
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-16 17:57:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging? Looks like name and ele tags somehow got mixed.

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-16 18:15:56 UTCdaniel-ibex Hi - the log cabin shelter is out-of-path - node 4904544425, v2 is independently - cordially

sorry , I do not speak English
12017-06-15 13:39:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4904979640

Looks like something went wrong with the name tag.
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-15 15:25:52 UTCTe-Ika Oh yep, got it fixed, thanks!
12017-06-15 13:37:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "wayID" to several roads. This key is not used anywhere else - what is the meaning? Is it an official number? This is tagged as 'ref' usually.

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-15 13:36:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this tagging: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46615603

The tag "M = 4" looks like a mistake.
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-15 13:29:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw you added some destination tags lately. I would like to point out the usual order of suffixes, e.g.
destination:colour:lanes:backward
(not destination:lanes:colour:backward)

In general, the scheme is:
key[:subkey][:hgv|:bicycle|...][:lanes][:forward|:backward|:both_ways] = *


...
12017-06-14 11:46:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
'socket:schuko:output' wird bis jetzt nicht verwendet, 'socket:schuko:current' ist (auch für andere Stecker) wesentlich verbreiteter.
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-14 13:49:13 UTCschnism Hi,

ich war mir da auch nicht sicher, und habe mich darum am Wiki orientiert:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Auch taginfo sagt leider garnichts dazu:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=charging_station#combinations

Beides mappen ist auch ...
32017-06-14 14:24:38 UTCmueschel Ja, die "Kombinationen" sind da nicht umfassend genug für seltene Tags. Ich habe hier geschaut:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/socket:type2#similar

Unter der Stecker-Tabelle im Wiki taucht "socket:type2:output" tatsächlich auf, wird aber im Gegensatz zu curr...
12017-06-14 12:51:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the spelling of the key "Source:maxspeed" on 90 ways? It should be lower case, 'source:maxspeed'.

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-14 11:59:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the 'capacity:' tag here? Something's missing.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498675775
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-14 11:55:32 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498610347
I guess those tags shouldn't be there, or the way should be closed or part of a relation. And I don't see the meaning of the 'fff' key.

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-14 13:54:52 UTCMichaelCollinson Thanks Jan for finding this. Incomplete edit. I have completed it now.
12017-06-14 11:48:15 UTCmueschel Kann man das wieder löschen?
22017-06-18 08:48:59 UTCRisou Ja
12017-06-14 11:36:38 UTCmueschel This changeset contains another set of 380 misspelled address tags, addr_house,
addr_stree.

Please fix this before uploading!
22017-06-14 14:38:23 UTCAndrew Matheny Corrected in changeset 49531966. Thanks!
12017-06-14 11:31:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
ich habe zwei Tipps zum Erfassen von Wegweisern:
a) wenn du Keys wie 'direction_west_1' benutzt, schreibe 'direction_west:1', das ist die übliche Form zum Nummerieren.
b) Ich empfehle Relationen um solche Schilder zu erfassen, das ist wesentlich genauer und einfacher auszuwerten, siehe: ...
12017-06-13 10:52:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this container?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4896938441

"domestic_oil" is not used as a key up to now. Maybe "recycling:cooking_oil = yes"?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-13 10:49:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Namen schauen? Da stimmt das Tagging nicht.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29468157

Gruss, Jan
12017-06-13 10:48:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this place node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4898346197

"Lera = asphalt" looks like a mistake.
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-13 10:59:15 UTCzvenzzon Thanks a lot, it's now corrected.
12017-06-13 10:38:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag you put on this node looks a bit strange:
xmas \t= Traffic calming bump
Did you mean "traffic_calming = bump"?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-13 12:50:31 UTCszydzio Hi! Yes indeed, I meant traffic_calming = bump. I was just an old node imported by OsmAnd which for some unknown reason adds this strange tag. I cleaned it up - thanks for the hint!
12017-06-13 10:35:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier nochmal über die Adressen schauen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497998566
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497998573
Tags wie dieses sehen nach einem Fehler aus:
89a = Am Winkel

Gruß, Jan
12017-06-13 10:25:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier gibt es 97 Bäume mit dem Tag "de:genus". Das sollte richtig "genus:de" heißen. Schaust du da bitte nochmal drüber?

Gruß, Jan
22017-06-13 12:05:23 UTCkartonage Uff, richtig blöder Dreher. Habe es korrigiert, danke!
12017-06-13 10:23:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your edits in this area I saw about 80 cases of a spelling mistake "destionation" instead of "destination". Could you please check this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-12 10:54:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this barrier and the one close by?
http://osm.org/node/4895536995
The tag "hoy =30" looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-12 12:31:35 UTCAllroads Yes, changed it. i can not clarify, why this tag. I believe, I merged it. And was already there.
12017-06-12 10:40:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "source=google" here. Please not that information from google is not allowed to be added in OSM due to the terms of usage / licenses. Please remove the information you got from Google, otherwise we might have to delete the whole object.
Jan
12017-06-11 10:34:31 UTCmueschel Moin,
kannst du bitte hier nochmal über die Adressen schauen? Das Tag "addr:coutry=DE" sollte eigentlich "addr:country=DE" sein - ist aber eigentlich auch unnötig, weil Grenzen bei uns sehr gut erfasst sind.

Gruß, Jan
22017-06-12 10:47:37 UTCJanisJf Ja war ein doofer fortgeführter copy & paste Rechtschreibfehler :O Hab es schon gefixt.
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49464049)
12017-06-11 10:30:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 3 nodes with strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4895835026
Looks like something went wrong with importing your GPS data. Could you have a look?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-11 10:36:47 UTCAndersAndersson Hello,
Thanks for pointing that out. I add a lot of nodes from my GPS surveys. Sometimes I forget to remove the extra data that my Garmin GPS device adds. I have fixed that node now, and will do a search for similar data with overpass-turbo.eu.
12017-06-11 10:22:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "alt_ name" to 31 streets. Could you fix the spelling of the key, there should be no space, like "alt_name".

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-07 20:15:57 UTCtrigpoint Hi, this gate looks a little wrong as it has 3 ways connecting to it. It needs to be separate from the junction otherwise it is impossible to tell which routes pass through the gate,
Cheers Phil
22017-06-07 20:17:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
that's not my work, it was added by http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49075370

Cheers, Jan
32017-06-07 20:46:10 UTCtrigpoint Hi Jan
Sorry, I will see if I can work it out.

Cheers Phil
12017-06-07 11:52:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several objects with strange tags like 54 =77
601 =77
Could you check that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-06-07 11:38:50 UTCmueschel Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM. Bitte schau mal ins Wiki, wie Addressen und POIs bezeichnet werden müssen. All diese Informationen sind z.Z. nicht auswertbar, weil sie nicht dem normalen Schema entsprechen.

adress \tEinener Dorfbauerschaft 30
ort \tWarendorf
plz \t48231
telefon \t4925841666\...
12017-06-07 11:28:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
das Tag "capacity:undisabled" gibt es bis jetzt nirgends sonst. Warum nicht das normale "capacity:disabled"?

Gruss, Jan
12017-06-06 11:15:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
is "Koma-koma" the name of this river?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331458995

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-31 13:10:21 UTCholgerd the field paper: http://fieldpapers.org/snapshots/3dsblppm#17/52.49256790905722/13.42859263080393
22017-06-06 11:00:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du diesen Node nochmal überprüfen bzgl Toiletten?

Gruß, Jan

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/700732539

toilets:wheelchair \tno
toilets:wheelchair_1 \tyes
12017-06-06 10:56:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
this is another set of nodes with no valid tag, but a lot of foreign stuff. Please clean up your data before importing it to OSM!

Jan
12017-06-06 10:38:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this roundabout? It has several strange tags.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496820690

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-08 00:10:19 UTCSunfishtommy I took away the tags I don't know where they came from.
12017-06-05 20:39:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "dsscreated=#brunch" on several POIs, could you explain it?

Btw, please have a look to the Wiki about tagging of opening_hours - there is a well defined syntax to make it machine-readable.

Jan
12017-06-05 20:34:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put these tags on some ways:

maxweight = 3.5
maxweight:condition = yes @ service
The conditional tag doesn't seem to be right (yes is not a valid value for maxweight and @ service is not defined)

Can you explain what you want to tag here?

Cheers, Jan
22017-06-05 20:37:43 UTCYod4z the way is limited to 3.5 t but if the hgv is for service (trash, road construction...) it can go even if it has more than 3.5t.
12017-06-05 20:32:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
schaust du hier mal nach dem Versuch des Öffnungszeiten-Taggings? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496768509
Gruß, Jan
22017-06-05 20:47:43 UTCbielebog Ui, gut gesehen. Das war natürlich Quatsch und ist nun entfernt.
12017-06-04 19:23:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you checkt the tagging of this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494161242
The tag looks a bit strange:
"3 =\tcement_block"

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-04 19:06:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 115 ways have the key "operater", which should read "operator". Could you have a look and fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-06-05 02:12:47 UTCSupaplex Sure, I'll fix it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49254949
12017-06-04 19:00:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the tags
"Gresham Street=no" and "Winchester Walk = no" in your edits. Could you explain this?

Thanks, Jan
22017-06-04 20:26:47 UTCMacLondon Sorry, these were pasted in error. I have removed them both,
Thanks, Mac
12017-06-03 16:46:14 UTCkreuzschnabel Diese Änderung hat Teile der Burgstraße etwa 300 m nach Westen verschoben, fast zum Bahnhof, und zehn andere, damit verbundene Straßen gleich hinterher! Sieht wild aus, ich bekomme das nicht auf die Schnelle sortiert. Baust du das bitte _gleich_ wieder zurück?

Leider haben ...
22017-06-03 19:13:39 UTCmueschel Großteils korrigiert in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49227401
Direkt am Platz östlich der Burg stimmt noch eine Kleinigkeit nicht, und die living_street-Fläche mit durchgehenden Straßen sieht merkwürdig aus, liegt aber nicht an diesem Changeset.
32017-06-04 10:38:02 UTCfkMohr Ich bitte vielmals um Entschuldigung!
Wollte lediglich die Wanderweg-Route aktualisieren. Als ich das mit den Straßen dann sah, wollte ich alles rückgängig machen, fand aber keine Möglichkeit mehr dazu.
Kann man bereits gespeicherte Änderungen nicht mehr unwirksam machen?...
42017-06-04 10:51:22 UTCkreuzschnabel Das mit dem Straßen-Ziehen muss ein Versehen gewesen sein; da waren wohl noch einige Nodes selektiert und sind dann mit der Maus mitgewandert. Wanderrouten werden in OSM als Relationen abgebildet, in denen die betreffenden Straßen(abschnitte) drin sind oder nicht; dazu muss eine Stra&szl...
52017-06-04 11:03:30 UTCfkMohr Danke; ich hatte nach einer "Verschiebemöglichkeit" für die Wanderwege gesucht, aber nicht gefunden und hatte daher nicht mehr richtige Teile gelöscht und wollte die geänderte Route einfügen. Derzeit sind alle drei Routen (26, 28 & 29, wieso zweimal 28?) unterb...
62017-06-04 11:35:54 UTCfkMohr Teilweise wurde die Führung von Weg 29 durch Weg 26 ersetzt; möglicherweise gibt es auch dafür ein Funktion, so dass Löschen und Neuerstellen nicht optimal wäre.
72017-06-04 12:17:25 UTCkreuzschnabel Mein Hund lässt ausrichten, wenn du noch was im Kühlschrank hast, können wir auch gern einen kleinen Ausflug nach Oberjosbach unternehmen und uns das gemeinsam anschauen.
82017-06-04 12:50:16 UTCfkMohr Ich bin zu Hause (Bohnheck 20, unweit BZO); nur Hundefutter habe ich nicht.
92017-06-04 13:08:58 UTCkreuzschnabel Dann sach ich ma, wir stehen gegen 16 Uhr vor der Tür von http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368529588. Eventuelle Katzen am besten außer Sicht schaffen :-)
102017-06-04 13:19:29 UTCfkMohr Freue mich, Euch kennenzulernen ...
12017-06-03 13:43:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
these wells contain quite some foreign tags. E.g. lon and lat should not appear as tags in OSM, keys should not use capital letters. Could you have a look and correct this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-06-02 10:52:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
did you really mean "bear = yes"?
And, could you move the node to one side of the road? I guess the restaurant is not in the middle of the street?
12017-06-02 10:45:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier gibt es einige Nodes mit ungewöhnlichen Tags wie "GB 58; GH = path". Könntest du da mal nachschauen und korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan
22017-06-07 10:54:39 UTCwhb Danke für den Hinweis!
Habe die Fehler verbessert.
12017-06-02 10:43:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added more than 30 ways with the tag "Highway=Footway" - please note that all tags are case sensitive and these should be lower case.

Also, elevators are tagged "min level" and "max level". According to the wiki, this should be e.g. "level = 0;1;2;3&quo...
12017-06-02 10:30:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found several objects with very strange tags here, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496152016
area=89.7593806393
cota_p_a=55.41
fotografia=0
gid=44424
id_edifica=44424
id_lev=0.0
latlon=40°32'4.418"N 8°27'43.439"W
perimetro=56.7...
12017-05-31 09:53:38 UTCfreeExec please revert
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Lifecycle_prefix_.28.3Cstatus.3E:.3Ckey.3E_.3D_.3Cvalue.3E.29
22017-05-31 10:12:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
both versions are in use. The reason for my edit was your spelling mistake "constraction"
32017-05-31 15:50:07 UTCfreeExec It was necessary to correct the typo.
And now marked by a kind of amenity that does not exist in reality. Secondly, after the opening, more work is done to return the tag.
42017-05-31 16:25:37 UTCmueschel Alright, I changed it back.
12017-05-31 09:09:03 UTCopendcc Bicycle = official on a non rectangular building? Are you sure?
22017-05-31 09:19:28 UTCmueschel You're right, that's strange. I didn't put the tag there. I fixed the spelling of the key, but didn't notice it being strange for a building.

We have to ask rowers2, e.g. in this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48947839
12017-05-29 16:05:25 UTCMarkus366 Hallo,
dieser und weitere Abschnitte einer geplanten/ im Bau befindlichen Straßen wurden zuletzt mehrfach von verschiedenen Nutzern unterschiedlich getaggt. Häufig wurden die Schlüssel highway:construction , trunk: und construction: hin und her geändert. Vielleicht können ...
22017-05-29 17:14:33 UTCmueschel Siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48979895
12017-05-29 16:02:49 UTCMarkus366 Hallo,
dieser und weitere Abschnitte einer geplanten/ im Bau befindlichen Straßen wurde zuletzt mehrfach von verschiedenen Nutzern unterschiedliche getaggt. Häufig wurden die Schlüssel highway:construction , trunk: und construction: hin und her geändert. Vielleicht können...
22017-05-29 16:29:13 UTCMrWebber Hallo,
Ich weiß gar nicht wo das Problem noch liegt. Ich habe alle Fehler verbessert.

Gruß MrWebber
32017-05-29 17:14:17 UTCmueschel Dann kommentiere ich auch hier und nicht in meinem Changeset:
Erst highway = proposed, dann highway = construction (zunächst mit Tippfehler den ich korrigiert habe). Die letzte Änderung von t2425 verstehe ich nicht ganz, aber das hast du dann ja wieder geradegezogen.
12017-05-28 10:53:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded many objects with very strange tags here, like these:

addr:place \t02050
building \ttran thanh toan
highway \tdhok
landuse \t16092737352
place \t0340302730
shop \t56/26

This looks like something went wrong during an import. Can this be reverted?
Jan
12017-05-28 10:50:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "traffic_signals:directions" 16 times - the correct spelling would be "traffic_signals:direction". Could you fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-28 10:42:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495243526
The tag "loading zone = yes" doesn't exist yet.
Would these tags be what you try to express?
highway = service
area = yes
vehicle = delivery
?
22017-05-29 17:42:52 UTCLAEM Hi,

Yes, thank you.
12017-05-28 10:35:59 UTCmueschel Hallo,
ich habe hier an einigen Nodes den Key "slope_curb" gesehen, "sloped_curb" wäre richtig. Schaust du da mal nach?
Gruß, Jan
22017-05-28 16:04:00 UTCemga Hopla, das sollte natürlich nicht sein, da hab ich mich vertippt. Schau es mir an!
32017-05-28 16:22:42 UTCemga Sollte passen, Danke für den Hinweis
12017-05-28 10:34:32 UTCmueschel Moin,
habe hier an 11 Nodes den Key "sloped_curbs" gesehen - "sloped_curb" wäre richtig.

Gruß, Jan
22017-05-28 11:14:07 UTCThoschi Hi,
danke für den Hinweis. Habe aber jetzt auf die Schnelle nur 6 Nodes wiedergefunden (und geändert).
Gruß Thorsten
12017-05-28 10:22:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4868074917
The tag seems strange:
5653 = sv:Gora_Sad-Ishtrag
22017-05-28 17:05:30 UTCgosausee @mueschel:
thx 4 your info. i changed it!
12017-05-28 10:19:45 UTCmueschel Hi, something went wrong here: You didn't "remove unnecesary tags", but added 100 nodes with just a strange "@id" tag.
Could you fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-05-29 05:55:40 UTCmarianp_telenav Done! Thank's!
Regards, Marian
12017-05-26 09:02:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "barriere = all" on 24 ways - looks like a mistake. Did you mean "barrier = wall"?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-26 08:59:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
deine erste Version "bus_bay =left" ist die laut Wiki korrekte. Das Suffix :left soll nur verwendet werden um weitere Eigenschaften anzugeben. Und ist auch nur dann nötig, wenn bus_bay = both und die Eigenschaften auf beiden Seiten unterschiedlich sind.

Gruß, Jan
22017-05-26 10:28:49 UTCToniE Danke Jan,

dann werde ich mal in mich gehen und nachvollziehen, wo ich das bisher schon gemapped habe. Außer hier wohl nur am westlichen Teil der Truderinger Straße - glaub' ich.

Gruß
Toni
12017-05-24 18:44:32 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert - viele Gebäudedetails gelöscht.
22017-05-24 18:46:28 UTCmueschel Zur Information: Die meisten Gebäude am Campus waren mit vollständigem 3D-Mapping erfasst, siehe z.B. hier:
http://maps.osm2world.org/?zoom=18&lat=50.17364&lon=8.63088&layers=B0TTFF
Die meisten dieser Informationen wurden hier gelöscht.
12017-05-24 18:40:29 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert (Dach gelöscht)
12017-05-24 18:38:44 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert - doppelter POI node, Löschen von existierenden Objekten.
12017-05-24 18:36:52 UTCmueschel Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert (Löschen von Gebäudedetails)
12017-05-24 09:06:25 UTCmueschel Warum hast du hier alle Informationen zu den Gebäuden (Aussehen, Höhe etc.) gelöscht?
22017-05-24 09:12:12 UTCGoetheUniversitaet Sorry, wenn das so war, dann ohne Absicht. Kannst du es wieder zurücksetzen?
Sind noch neu, kennen uns noch nicht so gut aus. Wir ergänzen auch gleich unser Profil mit weiteren Infos.
32017-05-24 18:35:44 UTCmueschel Ich habe diese Löschung eines Gebäudeteils und Gebäudedetails revertiert.
12017-05-24 18:35:32 UTCmueschel Ich habe diese Löschung eines existierenden Gebäudeteils revertiert.
12017-05-24 11:30:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way got many strange tags - could you check this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494283585
altitudeMode = null
begin = null
building = yes
description = null
drawOrder = null
end = null
extrude = 0
icon = null
postal = yes
tessellate = -1
timestamp = nul...
12017-05-24 11:21:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw the tag "being=sourse" on many objects. Did you want to write "source = bing"?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-23 20:39:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your edits you used the keys
faa:LFSN
faa:LSFN
FAA:LSFN
Could you use just one spelling?
Jan
22017-05-23 20:40:25 UTCmueschel Addendum: FAA:LFSN is used 52 times already
32017-05-24 13:35:32 UTCmicahcochran I'll try to do better spelling it. You are correct that it should be FAA:LFSN. This is "FAA's Landing Facility Site Number". I should probably remove it when there is some other kind of ID.
Thanks,
Micah
12017-05-23 17:26:29 UTCmueschel Hi, welcome to OSM!
I found tags like
Jumlah Lantai=1
Kedalaman Pondasi=1 meter
Material Bangunan=Balok Semen
Ventilasi=ada
jenis atap=genteng
jenis lantai=Keramik
on several objects.
This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software c...
12017-05-22 10:19:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 1880 objects with tags like "@id = way/5678989" This looks like a mistake - could you have a look and fix it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-22 19:41:02 UTCTheDutchMan13 Yeah i'll check it out now
32017-05-24 14:44:05 UTCTheDutchMan13 Reverted due to unknown errors
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48949502
42017-05-24 14:44:33 UTCTheDutchMan13 Should be fixed now. Took me a few days to figure it out.
12017-05-21 17:52:52 UTCmueschel Moin,
du hast dieser Straße zwei maxspeeds verpasst, kannst du das mal nachprüfen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177853840/history
22017-05-21 21:32:51 UTCPrince Kassad das war definitiv nicht beabsichtigt. Anscheinend hatte vorher jede Fahrtrichtung ein unterschiedliches maxspeed (30 hin und 50 zurück), woraus dann beim Zusammenfügen "maxspeed=30;50" wurde. Ohne vor Ort gewesen zu sein müsste man aber raten, ob jetzt 30 oder 50 gilt. Was d...
32017-05-21 21:36:42 UTCPrince Kassad Ich hab gerade gesehen dass es für die Ecke frische Mapillary-Bilder gibt. Demnach ist definitiv 30 richtig (ist eine Tempo-30-Zone), 50 ist Schmarrn. Hab das auch schon korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48871202
12017-05-21 16:48:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found four buildings with the tag "ODK =OMK". Looks like a mistake, could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-26 05:15:39 UTCmmahmud Hi, thanks for showing me this. Somehow it got pasted on the features. I will correct them.
:)
12017-05-20 15:39:59 UTCmueschel Diese Straße ist nicht komplett gesperrt, sondern z.Z. nur ein kleiner Abschnitt westlich des Waldes.
12017-05-20 13:45:25 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier in den letzten Jahren ja so einige Wanderrouten eingetragen. Bei den Längenangaben mit dem "distance" Tag hast du aber Kommazahlen benutzt anstelle des in OSM üblichen englischen Punktes als Dezimaltrenner. Würdest du da vielleicht bei Gelegenheit einen ...
22017-06-05 09:28:53 UTCHGSandhagen Hallo Jan,

ich habe die Distanzen der Wanderrouten "OSM-konform" geändert.
Gruß, Hans-Gerd
12017-05-20 13:18:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
ich finde hier einige Wege, bei denen du das "incline" Tag geändert hast, z.B. von "2%" auf den merkwürdigen Text "up,_down,_5%". Könntest du das bitte wieder korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan
12017-05-19 10:48:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you used these tags to describe the Symbol for this route?
background \tred_frame
foreground1 \tred_rectangle
foreground2 \twhite_rectangle

We do have the key "osmc:symbol" to describe such symbols.

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-19 08:54:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw that you are adding destination tags to roads. I would like to remind you that the order of the parts of a key is important, it should always be:
key[:subkey][:lanes][:forward|:backward]
e.g.
destination:colour:lanes:backward

I saw a few keys where this order is mixed.
Cheers, Jan
12017-05-19 08:46:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check this import of nodes? All of them have many foreign keys which should not appear in the OSM data base. The one common key (building=yes) should not be there, because these nodes are not the actual building, which are already in the database.
Jan

http://www.openstreetm...
12017-05-16 10:50:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
some of the ways have strange tags, can they be removed? All necessary information is contained in the relations you added as well.
E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492834831

Jan
22017-07-26 18:39:01 UTCSAnugroho Sorry, late response. Already fixed by changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49180151 Thank you.
12017-05-16 10:44:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? It has only foreign keys:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492361529

Cheers, Jan
22017-07-26 18:20:27 UTCSAnugroho Sorry, late respond. Fixed by changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50566679 Thank you.
12017-05-16 10:36:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the spelling of keys. On 35 nodes I found "water_tankt:housenumber" instead of "water_tank:housenumber" Could you have a look and correct these?

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-16 10:35:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
I would like to point you to the "Date Namespace": This makes historical entries like yours much easier to read, e.g.
Instead of:
was:2:name \tБородинская улица
was:2:name:end_date \t1918
was:2:name:fi \tBorodinonkatu
was:2:name:ru \tБородинская ули...
12017-05-14 17:54:29 UTCPeilscheibe Hallo mueschel, gibt es irgendeinen besonderen Grund für die Entfernung einer zutreffenden Information? Wurde das Schild geändert?
22017-05-14 17:57:03 UTCmueschel Die Information war doppelt vorhanden. Ich habe nur eine der beiden Angaben "Rietheim 4.3 km;Terrassenfreibad 0.4 km" entfernt.
32017-05-14 20:52:04 UTCPeilscheibe Das war kein Duplikat, das war ein Hinweis auf einen Fehler am Schild. Genauer: was Du gelöscht hast, ist exakt der Text, der auf dem Schild steht (*:signposted). Ich habe das mal wiederhergestellt.
42017-05-14 20:59:30 UTCmueschel Dann schreib doch da bitte eine note="Schreibfehler 'Terasse' auch auf Schild vorhanden", das verstehen dann auch andere Mapper. Neu erfundene Tags, deren Wert eine (fast) Kopie eines anderen Tags sind, versteht niemand und verwirren nur.
12017-05-08 18:50:54 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
What did you try to add to the database? All nodes you added have some foreign tags which should not be here, and don't have any meaningful ones.
Jan
22017-05-14 14:14:45 UTCmueschel I just reverted these edits as they did not contain any valuable additional information to data already existing.
32017-05-14 20:43:07 UTCgeow Hi cstp, if you are intending to create a route for ski mountaineering (scialpinismo), you might use a route relation
with "type=route + route=piste + piste:type=skitour" see
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4663751 or
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5280864

Ciao
geow\...
12017-05-13 13:00:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the key "gateway = yes" on this node - did you mean "barrier = gate"?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4838972161

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-13 11:41:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found some ways with all foreign tags, and no usual OSM tags:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/p1l
Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan
22017-05-13 19:38:58 UTCRichard L Fixed my one and also another one I found. Thanks for notifying
12017-05-12 10:58:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the Korean key on this relation:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6939871/history
It's new and I don't really see where it comes from.
Jan
22017-05-12 21:06:15 UTCpyram Sorry, maybe a copy&paste-error (no idea).
Thanks for the error check.
Now I fixed the needless one-way-relation too (=> way).
12017-05-12 10:41:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "cossing_ref" 78 times. Correct would be "crossing_ref". Could you have a look and fix this? Cheers, Jan
12017-05-11 09:32:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some trees with strange tags like these:
529=zł
przy=odbiorze
197=162
Could you have a look and correct this? Here is a map with all these nodes:

http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(node%5B%22529%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22529%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22529%22%5D%3B)...
22017-05-11 14:46:29 UTCd3mol3k Thanks for paying attention - something got pasted (I do not know how) - corrected
12017-05-10 11:13:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
just a hint: You used the tag combination "building = yes" "wall = no". You can use "building = roof" instead.

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-11 10:12:51 UTCagab29 Hello Jan,

Unfortunately this building tag is automatically generated by french import cadastre tool.

May be could you suggest your idea to developer at https://trac.openstreetmap.fr/newticket

Best regards

André
12017-05-09 10:49:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way got rather strange tags, could you check and correct that?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34792962

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-09 11:02:07 UTCsebastic Please adjust the tags as you see fit.

The the tags from the outer way were simply moved to the relation as part of the old-style multipolygon fixing effort.

There is a lot of import data in these regions, that is for the local community to deal with.
32017-05-09 11:18:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
thanks for the reply. I think the situation is different for this way, have a look to the full history: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/34792962
It was natural=wood until a week ago, then all tags were deleted by someone else and you added some new tags. I don't see that this w...
42017-05-09 11:30:22 UTCsebastic There were a lot of duplicate node issues in this area. Those were fixed after the JOSM validator reported the issues before uploading the previously old-style multipolygons.
52017-05-09 17:25:00 UTCmueschel I guess natural=wood is right and the rest can be removed?
62017-05-09 18:50:27 UTCsebastic The tags seem to imply so, double check with satellite imagery.
72017-05-09 18:55:54 UTCmueschel Looks fine. I just changed it.
12017-05-09 10:39:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
In this edit, a few mistakes happened.
The tag "amenity=parking" should be put on the area only, but not on all of the nodes the area consists of.
Second, many objects contain many foreign keys which do not belong in the OSM database and should be removed; E.g.
col...
12017-05-08 19:54:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the name of this street? It only has a "nameol" and "old_name" tag.

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-08 19:52:57 UTCmueschel Moin,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127365799
note:motor_vehicle:backward \t= "Zubringerdienst gestattet"

Ist das nicht das, was OSM unter "destination" versteht? In DE entspricht das dem "Anlieger frei".

Gruß, Jan
12017-05-08 18:59:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags - e.g. you added several buildings with the tag "builing" instead of "building".

Cheers, Jan
12017-05-06 14:19:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
dieses Tor hat ein merkwürdiges Tag "max4:10". Kannst du da mal nachschauen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4827515404

Jan
22017-05-06 17:50:21 UTCCassini97 Salve Jan!

Ist doch frängggisch! ;-)

Geändert... jedenfalls, wenn ich die Sitzung gleich hochlade!

Dank und Gruß!
12017-05-06 14:18:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "mofa = n" on this bridge:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490496091 (and its other parts)
Is it 'mofa = no' or 'moped = no'?
Jan
22017-05-06 14:39:56 UTCCarto'Cité Thank for noticing. This has now been fixed to moped=no.
Antoine.
12017-05-06 13:44:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "NaPTANAreaCode" to all of these nodes. I guess this should be converted to "naptan:AtcoCode", as this is a tag used in many other places already.

Jan
12017-05-06 13:42:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many strange tags here, like these:
EntityHand=AEB
ExtendedEn=3 gros { FACING_3 PTE EXT } FACING_3-E01PTE 109710 38.1 0.0 5 { 0 0 0 0 }
Layer=GROS$
SubClasses=AcDbEntity:AcDbPolyline
What is the meaning of all this?
Also, indoor corridors should be tagged as ind...
22017-05-08 13:09:17 UTCMichi92 Dear Jan,

those tags descend from the shape files from which the map was created. For this reason, they will be removed as soon as possible.
The tag highway=footway is necessary to guarantee the beta navigation as Adrien Pavie suggested.

Cheers,

Michela
32017-06-03 09:10:20 UTCmmd Those shapefiles seem to originate from some AutoCAD files. How about the copyright status of those files? In any case, has this been discussed with the community beforehand? Are you aware of the following process? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import
42017-06-04 18:28:34 UTCMichi92 Dear mmd,

the shapefiles were originated from Quantum Gis software, which is open source.
Moreover the plans were officially provided from the building office of "Sapienza" University of Rome .

With my warmest regards,

Michela
52017-06-04 18:32:16 UTCmmd FYI: OSM Data Working Group (DWG) has already started reverting your imports as they don't adhere to OSM standards: see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49230231 as an example.
12017-05-06 13:39:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag "name:tok" to many countries. Which language does 'tok' refer to? I can't find it in the list of ISO 639 language codes.
Jan
12017-05-06 13:36:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
this village consists of social facilities only? There are many ways overlapping each other and the objects have tags (like 'facility_t') which don't seem to belong in the OSM database. Could you have a look and correct these issues?
22017-05-06 20:38:48 UTCkmoses28 These tags are in the process of being cleaned up.
12017-05-06 11:48:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
bitte denke daran Knoten zu setzen wenn zwei Wege sich kreuzen, z.B. ein Fußweg der eine Straße überquert.
Habe gerade einige solcher Punkte in Michelstadt korrigiert.

Gruß, Jan
12017-05-06 11:32:00 UTCmueschel Vorsicht beim Korrigieren von diesen duplicate ways - in der Gegend von Würzburg ist das momentane Problem nicht mit ein paar lokalen Edits zu lösen, die machen es eher noch schlimmer weil Reverts nicht mehr möglich sind.
z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491622891

Gruß...
12017-05-06 11:29:06 UTCmueschel Bitte füge keine neuen Wege mehr hinzu die mit anderen Wegen überlappen. Hier in der Region ist ein riesiges Chaos entstanden, das ersteinmal beseitigt werden muss.
12017-04-08 11:40:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
what are all these tags you put on 250++ ways? They are new, not used anywhere else and don't seem to be documented.

escala=drenajes a 1:25000
estado_dre=5102
fecha_modi=08/04/2015
responsabl=Alejandra Gómez Sarmiento
ruleid=1
vigencia=0

Thanks, Jan
22017-05-04 15:31:05 UTCopengislab I tell you because those attributes are that way.
This disaster happened on April 1, 2017.
In Mocoa there was very little information, the task was activated in tasking manager of OSM Colombia, https://tareas.openstreetmap.co/project/50

In two days we managed to map the necessary and the result...
32017-05-04 15:59:10 UTCmueschel I know that this is very useful information and we should try to have this information in the database.
You write:
"igac information was used, which is available and can be used under conditions , And one of them is not to lose the original attributes."

I'm sorry to say, but this mean...
12017-05-03 08:45:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this tagging? Is Frailes the name?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171545533

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-03 14:43:25 UTCFederico Explorador Hi Jan,

I think it is "Fraile", according to IGAC maps, but I have no field evidence for the rivers name.
32017-05-04 10:24:11 UTCmueschel Alright. I'll change the tag "Fraile = Fraile" to "name = Fraile".
12017-05-03 09:30:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this tagging? The maxspeed tag is strange:
openstreetmap.org/way/490097570

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-03 09:37:08 UTChanoj Thanks, I know about tag fail, but I dont found it. Now is correct.
12017-05-03 08:58:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier sind einige Wege mit dem Tag "30=177" entstanden. Schaust du da nochmal nach?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35780993#map=17/47.84284/16.68863

Gruss, Jan
22017-05-04 05:58:24 UTCTBKMrt Hätte maxspeed=30 werden sollen. Danke für den Hinweis - ist korrigiert in #48383540.
12017-05-02 11:11:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the key "building_material" to 127 objects. The usual spelling is "building:material" with ':' instead of '_'. Could you have a look and correct this?
Cheers, Jan
12017-05-02 11:08:58 UTCmueschel Moin,
was heißt denn "Alfie=Allen" an 30 Bäumen hier?
Gruß, Jan
22017-05-02 16:22:05 UTCq_un_go Moin,

das frage ich mich auch. Keine Ahnung wie mir das passiert ist. Nun ja, nun ist der Alf wieder ein Alien und kein Allen.
Gruß
Winfried
12017-04-30 17:20:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du mal nach dieser Straße schauen? Du hast ihr "maxspeed=50;30" verpasst, aber nur ein Wert kann stimmen.
http://osm.org/way/29341035

Gruß, Jan
22017-05-01 19:06:58 UTCSeparis Oh, danke für den Hinweis. Weiß auch nicht, wie die 30 da reingerutscht ist. Hab ich korrigiert. Gruß Werner
12017-04-30 16:47:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
meintest du hier eventuell "springy"? "swingy" ist mir unbekannt.
http://osm.org/node/4738337035

Gruß, Jan
12017-04-25 15:09:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you have a look to 40 trees added in this changeset? They have the tag "crown_type:=I"
Note the ':' in the key which shouldn't be there. Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan
22017-04-27 08:44:19 UTCtaxi301 Hi .
This is a proposal how to improve the tagging of trees (natural=tree) for the use in 3D-applications.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Marek_kleciak/Tree_table

I was curious if it would show up in 3D, I would improve on type = palm
Sorry for my English but only by translator. Regar...
32017-04-27 17:18:48 UTCmueschel Your tagging is fine. Just a spelling mistake:
You write: "crown_type:"
But it should be: "crown_type"
12017-04-26 09:49:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging changes? E.g. 'ref:-2001-02-12' is not a valid key. There should be a double '--' when using dates according to the wiki.

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-27 08:35:01 UTCfgouget As far as I can tell the wiki says to use " key:-date = value", and that the use of '--' is outdated: "An older version of ISO 8601 used the double hyphen to replace omitted years in partial dates".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Date_nam...
32017-04-27 17:16:24 UTCmueschel Indeed, it does. Since 7 days at least.
There is an extensive discussion on the talk page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Date_specification
12017-04-25 12:56:34 UTClenny32 The addr:* node already exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1522397032
There is no need to create another one at the restaurant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema
22017-04-25 17:51:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
I'm not aware of any tool that makes use of these tags. For most applications the tagged address was unusable. The existence of another node close by with address information is not sufficient to find the actual address of this POI.
The only case how addresses of another object can be used on...
32017-04-26 06:30:46 UTCdgitto It is the tool that have to follow (use) a schema. Not the tag schema follow some tools.
Is normal that no tools exist, when a schema starts to be used.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema
42017-04-26 08:07:33 UTCmueschel Until this schema has been adopted, we have to stick to the old scheme, otherwise we lose information. I.e. both tags have to exist in parallel.
But, I really doubt that any tool will use this tagging, based on a 4 year old draft without even an RFC.
52017-04-26 09:20:24 UTClenny32 It seems to me that an address should be unique (it exists with or without POI) it is an object in its own right. Many POIs have no address.
If it is the same node, when the POI disappears or moves, the address may be deleted or moved with the poi by the inattentive contributor. Contact information...
12017-04-25 15:08:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
this changeset created 9 relations with no common tags - could you check this and replace the foreign keys with common ones if necesseary?

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-24 21:36:00 UTCAthalis Hi, beim way 407255155 wolltest du wahrscheinlich wie bei den anderen Wegen das Komma durch einen Punkt austauschen? Sieht aus als ob der Punkt verloren gegangen ist ;)
22017-04-24 21:47:00 UTCmueschel Ja, der Verdacht liegt nahe ;-) Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe es korrigiert.
12017-04-24 10:47:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node, it has a strange tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4806907046
80-84= 41-55

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-24 10:42:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some strange tags to objects, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488399710
"Market = Sub Post Office" and several more. What is the meaning of this?

Please have a look to the wiki to find out how common features like shops have to be tagged to be shown on the map.
...
12017-04-22 15:17:14 UTCdamjang Ok, but so the wiki must be corrected:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone :-)
22017-04-23 13:32:49 UTCmueschel You're right. Looks like somebody wants to distinguish between phone service in Italian language (:it) and an phone number to be reached from Italy only (:IT). Kind of makes sense but is hard to remember.
32017-04-23 21:37:35 UTCdamjang Bacause this is a phone number free only usable from Italy, if for you is ok, I will rechange to upper chars (phone:IT)
42017-04-24 09:36:57 UTCmueschel Yes, sure. It was my mistake.
12017-04-23 10:47:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
schaust du bei diesem Weg nochmal nach den beiden lanes* Tags? Da ist etwas schiefgegangen.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297874842

Gruss, Jan
12017-04-22 11:15:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
the correct tag "addr:housenumber" was changed to the wrong tag "adr:housenumber" on 18.000 buildings in this city. Some of these changes where done in this changeset.
Could you fix that - or let me know if you need help with it.

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-21 08:47:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du nochmal nach dem Tagging schauen '_vertical' ist ein ungewöhnlicher Key.

Gruß, Jan
12017-04-20 19:00:32 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the "housename" on this building?
http://osm.org/way/332283894

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-28 06:38:32 UTCtanjeff Hello Jan,
the buildings at Layenhof have 4-digit numbers which I mapped as addr:housenumber. The building you mentioned seems to have two numbers (63 and 5872), but I don't remember the details. I will check that when I'm there again (might take 2 weeks). I will add a further comment then.
Regard...
32017-06-11 12:17:45 UTCtanjeff Hello Jan,
Sorry for the delay, I was quite busy. As I wrote, the houses in the area have 4-digit numbers. For most buildings, I mapped this number as addr:housenumber.

But the building in question has two numbers: 64 (not 63) and 5872. I guess that 64 is the number to use when sending letters, ...
12017-04-20 18:56:29 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du nochmal über diese 3 Relationen schauen? Eine ist nicht geschlossen, alle drei haben keinen Namen

http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159115
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159792
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/7159745

Gruß,...
12017-04-20 10:40:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
you tagged some buildings with "building:wall" and "building:roof". I replaced these tags with the common building:material and roof:material keys. These are in use in many places and are defined in the wiki.

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-20 13:51:21 UTChbrown14 Hi - Thanks! I feel so silly about this tagging mistake. I'll be sure to fix the remaining tag mistakes in this area.
Sudie
12017-04-15 16:38:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
it's a bit strange that this railway in Greece uses German signaling. Could you check that? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4790883029
Jan
22017-04-19 03:44:15 UTCLowe253 Hi Jan,
Greek Railways do actually uses german signalling although this might sound bizarre to people. This is not a full replication of ESO, but a lite version (no train protection system, no electrified rails until late 90's and so on). If you try wikipedia you can check also the historical reas...
32017-04-19 09:04:14 UTCmueschel Alright, I wasn't aware of this. I stumbled across it because of a spelling mistake: railway:signal:main:f should be railway:signal:main:form, I think.
42017-04-19 10:42:03 UTCLowe253 You are right, my bad...
12017-04-18 10:57:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
these POIs have some foreign tags that could (and should) be converted to usual OSM tags, e.g.
ACCESSIBLE
ADDRESS
ADDRESS_FR
NAME_FR
NOTES

Could you have a look?
Cheers, Jan
22017-04-18 10:59:23 UTCRps333 I will have a look. thanks
12017-04-18 10:34:42 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du erfindest hier (mal wieder) Unmengen an neuen Tags. Bitte informiere dich über gängige Tags. In der jetztigen Form sind diese Informationen absolut nutzlos.
Beispiele:
bicycle situation
bicycle designating Sign\t
Bicycle path color to walkway
cycle end
cycle path quality\t...
12017-04-17 11:14:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this building, it has many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486855572

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-17 21:19:55 UTCEnigmaQuip Fixed, sorry about that
12017-04-13 08:36:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some nodes with tags light "light_source". Street lamps usually are tagged with "highway=street_lamp", which should be there additional to your tags. Would you mind adding it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-13 14:19:51 UTCMRPockets I specifically chose not to tag them as "highway=street_lamp" since they are not street lamps. They illuminate primarily the grass and sidewalks, not streets. I could not find any better tags for non-street lamps than simply "light_source=lantern." If I am misunderstanding the us...
32017-04-16 19:59:08 UTCmueschel I don't think we do distinguish between street lamps and path lamps. Until we come up with a distinction, I opt for tagging them with the common tag to make them visible on existing maps.
12017-04-16 16:32:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong with this import. The nodes are spread over the ocean...
Also, "Adresse" and "Nom" are no common tags in OSM and should be properly tagged.

Jan
22017-04-19 21:52:39 UTCSomeoneElse @mueschel no reply here so I've reverted these additions and sent the user a message that they have to read before continuing editing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1320 .
Best Regards,
Andy
12017-04-16 16:26:30 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put some urls to maps in the tags of these objects. I assume you used these as the source of your edits? To you have an permit to use these maps or are these licensed under a license compatible to ODbL?

Jan
22017-04-17 10:55:44 UTCemj Hej, nej detta är ett resultat av cykelturer sedan den snöfria nyårsaftonen till nu. Öppettiderna är från hemsidan dock, jag hade bara fotat dessa på tre av ställena.

Jag gör ganska många kartläggningar som jag inte lägger upp men n&...
32017-04-17 10:57:17 UTCemj English: Yes I've a ODBL + Contributors Term Compatible source for the edit. I'm sorry I was trollnig about the import.
12017-04-15 14:51:00 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier das highway-Tag entfernt, aber es laufen noch einige Wanderrouten über diesen Weg. Wie sieht das vor Ort wirklich aus?
http://osm.org/way/23325729

Gruß, Jan
22017-04-16 16:51:05 UTCmaction Hallo Jan,
nachdem die Neugestaltung der Rheinwiesen und der Uferpromenade gestartet war, hatte ich das Attribut highway der betroffenen Straßen und Wege entsprechend dem damaligen (4/2016) Zustand mit dem Lifecycle-Prefix demolished versehen. Heute sind die neuen und teils alten Straße...
12017-04-14 11:09:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added more than 6000 buildings with a misspelled house number tag: "adr:housenumber" instead of "addr:housenumber". Could you have a look and fix that? Let me know if you need help.

Jan
12017-04-12 11:29:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are six nodes like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4784899723
They don't have any common tag. Could you have a look?

Jan
22017-04-12 11:48:37 UTCzerpou Hi Jan,

I have integrated these points with her substations

Have a good day,

Albin
12017-04-12 10:36:21 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check the tagging of these 3 rivers?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485498407
The tag "Barranco del Pico = Rio Nuerna" looks a bit strange.
Jan
22017-04-12 11:44:39 UTCdalop Thanks for the advise, It was my mistake! I just fixed that now
12017-04-12 08:51:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 80 buildings with many foreign tags like the ones shown below.
I don't think they belong into the OSM database - can they be removed?

Cheers, Jan

ADAT=2013-05-08 09:04
ANDAMAL_1=130
ANDAMAL_10=0
ANDAMAL_1T=Bostad; Småhus friliggande
ANDAMAL_2=0
ANDAMAL_3=0
ANDAMAL_4=0...
22017-04-12 11:00:13 UTCDalkvist He was doing some incompatible sourced imports, they have stopped now and I have emailed dwg to redact the changesets.
12017-04-11 19:52:02 UTCBob Moin!
Eine no_entry restriction (hier: Deine Änderung an der Relation 6848355) kann mehrere from-Mitglieder haben, so steht es im Wiki. Das gelöschte Mitglied habe ich daher wiederhergestellt. Das aufgestellte Zeichen 267 betrifft beide Richtungen.
22017-04-11 20:02:08 UTCmueschel Auf den meisten Wiki-Seiten steht "exakt 1", auch auf der Deutschen. Nur die tschechische und englische Seite erlauben mehrere für no_entry.

Ich würde die Relation vielleicht lieber verdoppeln, je eine für jeden from-Weg. Wer weiß, welcher Router damit Probleme hat.
32017-04-12 10:42:00 UTCPeilscheibe @mueschel: Die no_entry und no_exit-restrictions wurden ja genau zu dem Zweck so definiert, das man eben nicht mehrere Relationen braucht, wo eine genügt. Wenn ein Router nicht mit mehreren from- bzw. to-ways klarkommt, darf er gerne dazulernen.
42017-04-12 15:54:14 UTCBob Moin zusammen!
Die deutsche Wiki-Seite ist dazu leider wohl veraltet. Sie kennt die no_entry und no_exit restriction (noch) nicht. Die kamen erst 2011 hinzu und die Übersetzung hat noch keiner angepackt.
12017-04-09 10:49:25 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier eine Tags neu erfunden, die sonst nirgends verwendet werden:

parking:condition:cost
parking:condition:duration
parking:condition:note
parking:condition:user\tparking:condition:vehicle

Bitte schau mal im Wiki nach den üblichen Tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w...
22017-04-10 07:01:55 UTCFrank Bielig Die Tags gibt es teilweise schon. Leider sind viele Tags mit entweder :both:, :right: oder :left: versehen. Hier trifft aber keine dieser Varianten zu.
32017-04-10 09:32:25 UTCmueschel "cost" -> "fee"
"interval" -> "time_interval"
"duration" -> "maxstay"
"vehicle" und "user" gibt es nicht, das muss über condition angegeben werden wenn es Einschränkungen gibt.

Die Tags gehö...
42017-04-10 10:36:40 UTCFrank Bielig "Die Tags gehören eigentlich an die Straße selbst, ..."
Das ist der eigentliche Diskussionspunkt. Bei der Wahl der Tagnamen sind wir leidenschaftslos, könnte auch immer leicht angepasst werden. Schwieriger ist der Punkt, wie die Geometrien aufgenommen werden. Wir haben u...
52017-04-10 11:32:25 UTCRalf Bielig "Die Tags gehören eigentlich an die Straße ..."

Das sehe ich dann problematisch, wenn:
* die Parkstreifen beider Straßenseiten physisch weit auseinander liegen, z.B. bei mehrspurigen Straßen.
* die Parkkonditionen sich alle paar Meter ändern oder auf beiden...
62017-04-10 11:48:00 UTCmueschel Ja, ideal ist das vorhandene Schema nicht. Ich denke, sowas sollte mal in größerer Runde diskutiert werden, z.B. im Forum mit ein paar gut ausgewählten Beispielen.
Das beste Tagging nützt ja am Ende nichts, wenn es die Auswerter nicht umsetzen wollen oder können.
72017-04-10 14:23:15 UTCNakaner Hallo Frank,

wer ist denn "wir"? Falls ihr organisiert oder mit kommerziellen Absichten in OSM editiert, solltet ihr das samt der Motivation und eurer Pläne offenlegen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
82017-04-10 15:53:52 UTCFrank Bielig Hallo Michael,
"uns", Kollegen mit großem Interesse an digitalen Karten und langjährige Nutzer von OSM, möchten nur helfen, ein weiteres Feature bei OSM zu etablieren, welches ein Grundübel des heutigen Straßenverkehrs in Metropolen beseitigen hilft: Parkpl&au...
12017-04-10 11:00:18 UTCmueschel Servus,
ich finde hier mehrmals "lity = sign" - sieht irgendwie nach Tippfehler aus.
Gruß, Jan
22017-04-10 15:27:12 UTCPeilscheibe Autsch. Vermutlich eine Teamleistung von Autovervollständigung und schnellem Finger ;-) Danke für's finden, ist repariert.
12017-04-04 14:34:50 UTCmueschel Could you please point me to the discussion page of this mechanical edit?
22017-04-04 19:14:35 UTCti-lo It's not mechanical, but manual
32017-04-04 19:29:41 UTCmueschel Even then, this has to be discussed beforehand (as you were told by the DWG this afternoon).
- > 600 objects edited worldwide within a single day
- in the ~ 10 cases I checked, some information was lost (e.g. used bikes and new bikes sales replaced by a single 'sales' tag)
- there are tags wit...
42017-04-09 14:00:19 UTCti-lo Sorry for the late answer, didn't get the notification somehow.
- Who is DWG ?
- Could you send me some examples for the "lost information" issue ?
- spelling mistakes shouldn't have happened as I mostly use copy & paste for the tags, but if you find errors, I'll correct them
- I c...
52017-04-09 15:33:33 UTCmueschel DWG = Data Working Group, the guys who gave you this block: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1293

lost information - this is very hard to find, given that you retagged thousands of stores and you have to look in the history of these nodes
"removing an established tagging scheme com...
62017-04-09 16:55:16 UTCti-lo Regarding DWG : Sent this message with explanations of my actions and was then unblocked immediately : woodpeck 4. April 2017 15:45
"well documented" is really an euphemism for the status before.
- (motorcycle) "clöthes" was not defined
- for "rental" there we...
72017-04-10 11:54:52 UTCDaveF Although this entity was tagged indirectly in the first place (it should be shop not amenity), you made it worse by removing any primary tag & substituting with a sole sub-tag. Sub-tags are 'adjective' tags which help describe the details of the objects.
82017-04-10 17:31:06 UTCti-lo That's right, I corrected it.
Pretty strange as I was sure I checked the entry when I answered ("Sorry for the late answer"). I once had an effect that a history entry disappeared (I edited an entry, later someone else edited it again, my edits were still there, but the history entry miss...
92017-04-10 17:41:43 UTCti-lo mea culpa, I checked the others, seems I didn't pay attention to this, correcting them now
12016-12-04 12:26:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "atl_name" on 40 nodes - this should be "alt_name". Would you mind correcting these?
Jan
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ksp
22017-04-02 15:23:52 UTCmueschel Hi (again),
this upload also contains several hundred nodes without any tags. Can these be deleted?
Jan
32017-04-02 16:44:56 UTCrashaurl Hello,
You do not need to delete them, these are blanks. Thank you
42017-04-08 14:44:38 UTCmueschel What do you mean by 'blanks'? Single nodes without tags are just useless.
52017-04-10 12:18:17 UTCrashaurl Billet, in order to then add tags.
I understandably wrote?
62017-04-10 12:18:51 UTCrashaurl i use gogle translate))
12017-04-08 11:43:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
all these buildings have a strange key that is not used in any other place:
tipo_const=NO CONVENCIONAL
What does it mean?
Btw, this looks a lot like an import, could you point me to the discussion and documentation of it on the mailing list or wiki?

Cheers, Jan
22017-05-04 15:40:48 UTCopengislab I tell you because those attributes are that way.
This disaster happened on April 1, 2017.
In Mocoa there was very little information, the task was activated in tasking manager of OSM Colombia, https://tareas.openstreetmap.co/project/50

In two days we managed to map the necessary and the result...
32017-05-11 20:15:48 UTCsmaprs Also almost all buildings have the same tags:
"building:levels=7".
But in fact, as can be seen in images, most buildings are houses of only 1 level (some few have 2 or 3).
What happened?
Was those same tags accidentallly copied/applied to all buildings?
12017-04-07 19:48:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
'abandoned' is written 'abandoned' and not 'abandonded'. Could you have a look and correct this on >60 objects?
Cheers, Jan
22017-04-08 16:21:45 UTCChristian Madsen Thank you for the feedback. Looks like JOSM has replicated a misspelling instead of the correct phrase. I will change it first opportunity I get.
32017-04-13 17:46:24 UTCChristian Madsen There, I think got them all now. Please comment if there are anyone left.
12017-04-06 15:46:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added more than 120 buildings with the misspelled key 'buiilding'. Could you have a look and correct this?
Jan
12017-04-04 17:18:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you explain the meaning of these tags?

numero_pis=1
numero_sot=0
tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL
tipo_domin=PRIVADO

Also, it looks like the images you use are misaligned, many of the buildings are intersecting the road (which seems to be in the right place according to GPS traces)
Could...
22017-04-04 23:15:20 UTCNicoVargas Yeah, it was caused by a direct import of an area not covered by the IGAC image we were using.

numero_pis=1 (# of floors )
numero_sot=0 (# of basement)
tipo_const=CONVENCIONAL (i think is a building with strong materials as cement, an so)
tipo_domin=PRIVADO (private)

This issue maybe remai...
32017-04-05 17:07:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
I can change the numero_pis to building:levels and building:levels:underground. I don't think we have an equivalent for the other two, should I delete them?
42017-04-05 17:34:30 UTCNicoVargas Yes please, replace it and delet it :) Many thanks
52017-04-05 18:48:45 UTCmueschel Ok, did in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47486023
12017-04-04 15:48:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377910114

The key 'ch]' looks like a mistake.
Jan
22017-04-04 19:47:24 UTCdudone Hi Jan

Many thanks for spotting this. I have removed the tag. There was also a highway=track tag missing for the way above this which I have now added.

Regards
Dudley
12017-04-02 15:46:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the name tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4766343316

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-03 07:01:24 UTCChristian Madsen Ops, my bad. Thanks for the feedback.
12017-04-02 15:38:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this building?
"Arme = Klarenstraat"
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70840140

Jan
22017-04-02 17:18:00 UTCJakka "Arme = Klarenstraat" deleted
12017-04-02 15:33:07 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du benutzt hier 70x den key "generator:mode" - das sollte eigentlich "generator:method" heißen. Korrigierst du das noch?

Grüße, Jan
12017-04-02 14:46:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
in this area you created a lot (~ 1000) of nodes without any tag which don't belong to a way or relation. I guess this was a mistake and they can be deleted?
E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/4311927621

Cheers, Jan
12017-04-02 14:42:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
something went wrong on some of the buildings you added: The ways are not correct, containing some nodes more than once. Could you have a look and correct these? Here is a map with error markers (Keepright):
osm.mueschelsoft.de/keepright/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=48.62793&lon=38.93588...
12017-04-02 14:17:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
I noticed some issues with this (huge) import of ~20000 trees.
- The nodes have several tags which are not defined in the wiki, such as
age,constituency, form, plot_number, site_name, usrn, ward
- I didn't find a discussion on this import. Was it announced on the mailing list?
- the 'height...
22017-04-27 14:01:51 UTCbrianboru This is now documented for discussion at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Birmingham_City_Council_trees_data following talk-gb converstions and is paused until issues are resolved
12017-04-01 17:17:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:17:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
22017-04-02 11:02:16 UTCjohanespeter9 thank you so much, i am still clearing data let me rectify right now
12017-04-01 17:17:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:17:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:16:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:16:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "toilests:disposal" on many objects. Unfortunately it has a spelling mistake and should be "toilets:disposal". Please correct this.
Jan
12017-04-01 17:14:22 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like this import went wrong - there is a huge amount of foreign tags on the ways. Could you clean this up?
Jan
12017-04-01 12:38:19 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was ist denn das hier: http://osm.org/way/331073395
Eine Fußgängerbrücke? Dann sollte noch "highway=path" ergänzt werden.
Gruß, Jan
12017-04-01 12:17:44 UTCmueschel Wurde die von dir geänderte Kreuzung hier umgebaut? Im Augenblick stimmen die Wege nämlich nicht mehr mit Bing überein.
Gruß, Jan
12017-03-30 13:27:08 UTCmueschel Hallo,
fast 60 der Gebäude haben das Tag "roof:sharp" anstelle von "roof:shape". Kannst du das noch korrigieren?
Griß, Jan
22017-03-30 14:26:32 UTCanbr Ja, den Tippfehler habe ich korrigiert ...
12017-03-30 13:26:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 50 points with keys POINT_X and POINT_Y. I guess this was a mistake and should be deleted?
Jan
12017-03-26 15:00:57 UTCmueschel Hallo Micha,
kannst du rund um diesen Weg noch nach den Bus-Relationen und dem Spurtagging schauen? Das stimmt jetzt alles nicht mehr.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42937214

Gruß, Jan
12017-03-26 12:53:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 6 ways (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337771983) with the key "ad]" - could you check and correct this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-26 14:32:39 UTCTomas Straupis Fixed. Thank you for noticing.
12017-03-25 12:24:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
here are 749 buildings with the tag "_building_1_=yes". Could you fix that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-03-25 11:46:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of three ways, including this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482320633
other_tags = "surface"=>"unpaved","tracktype"=>"2"
specifiche =5
trekking =1

Jan
12017-03-24 08:41:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
du nutzt hier das Tag 'night_only'. Nachtbusse werden normalerweise mit "by_night = only" getagged. Vielleicht willst du das noch anpassen?
Gruß, Jan
22017-03-26 20:56:50 UTCFlutus Ich dachte schon dass es eines geben müsste, hab aber keins gefunden.
Ist geändert.
12017-03-22 11:38:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used these tags:
traffic_signals:ground = yes
traffic_signals:light = yes
They are not in use in any other place yet - what is their meaning?
Jan
22017-03-22 12:05:19 UTCmweper Hi @mueschel.
This news talks about the tags (invented by now) that I put, since I did not know if there was a tag for that.
-
http://rosarionoticias.gob.ar/page/noticias/id/77308/title/Se-puso-en-funcionamiento-el-primer-semáforo-peatonal-de-piso-del-país
--
I put both for the do...
32017-03-22 12:22:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
alright. I would go with the 'floor_light' version. Please add an entry to the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
Recently, a similar installation was made in the Netherlands.
42017-03-26 20:06:58 UTCmweper Is it okay like this?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#How_to_add_a_floor_light_for_pedestrians.3F
12017-03-22 11:29:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
in your changesets I found a huge set of wrong tags, like these:
High way = Footpath
Water ways = intermediate
farm land \t= farm

Please have a look to the wiki how paths, rivers and buildings are tagged and use only these tags. Everything else is useless, because none of our software ca...
12017-03-21 11:54:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag 'addr:contact = yes' on many POIs. This is a new tag and not defined anywhere - what does it mean?
Jan
Jan
22017-03-21 12:39:15 UTCTomas Straupis It is a temporary tag to mark duplicate addresses until contact:* scheme is approved or at least we (Lithuanian mapping community) come to agreement that support of contact:* is good enough. For the time being f.e. iD editor does not support contact:*
We need this addr:contact info for QA and later...
12017-03-21 11:05:37 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. in your edits you used tags like '2nd floor occupant', 'other occupants' and several similar ones. These are not defined in the wiki and therefore are rather useless because none of our software can understand it. Please have a look to the wiki how POI like offices and shops hav...
12017-03-20 13:32:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
Could you check the spelling of tags? I found many 'buiding:levels' with a missing 'l'.

Jan
22017-03-21 03:59:09 UTCJessAk71 Oops so sorry my mistake on the missing letter I will double check and fix all them next week. Thanks for letting me know.
12017-03-20 09:38:58 UTCmueschel Partially reverted. Reason: features do not exist.
12017-03-20 09:37:30 UTCmueschel I reverted this changeset. Reason: This is a stream, not a man_made=breakwater
12017-03-20 09:36:26 UTCmueschel I reverted this changeset. Reason: This is not a park.
12017-03-19 15:12:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you have a look to the spelling of tags? E.g. I found
'electrifie' which should be 'electrified'
name_fa -> name:fa
full_name_ -> full_name
and few more. I corrected some of them but I don't know if I catched all.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-19 15:03:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please make sure you use only keys which are described in the Wiki. If you use other keys (like ones in Russian), no software can understand it and e.g. display it on a map.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-20 08:35:28 UTCopeihatebot А смещение для спутниковых снимков кто будет устанавливать?
32017-03-20 09:19:20 UTCandygol Я відмінив цей набір змін (див. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47006199)

This changeset was reverted by me (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47006199)
42017-03-20 09:34:47 UTCandygol Шановний Виик
Зважаючи на факт, що це ваша перша спроба участі в ОСМ, пропоную вам ознайомитись з деякими статями у Вікі проекту, які допоможуть вам зробити ваші зм...
12017-03-19 14:59:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
did you consider using the 'destination_sign' tagging for these signs?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign

This makes using the data much simpler like on this sign:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinationsign/example/#node=3908107513
22017-03-19 20:58:22 UTCCarlo Folini Hi,
no...but I definitely have to take a look into it! It seems very interesting
12017-03-19 14:50:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4741782702

hig=yes looks like a mistake

Jan
12017-03-19 14:44:48 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier bei einigen Tags ein '-' vorangestellt um sie zu 'deaktivieren'. Normalerweise benutzt man dafür einen der lifecycle prefixes, wie hier beschrieben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Wahrscheinlich passt 'disused:' hier.
Gruß, Jan
22017-03-19 15:41:39 UTCProtoxenus Ja, meine Intention war, das das (wahrscheinlich defekte) Molenfeuer nicht gerendert wird. Ich gehe davon aus, das es zu Saisonbeginn wieder in Betrieb geht.
Ich hatte auch erst überlegt, das anders kenntlich zu machen, aber ich fand nichts passendes. "Disused" ist nach meinem Sprach...
12017-03-17 12:09:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
this area doesn't have any valid tag. Could you check this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480839466

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-17 14:38:12 UTCjohanemilsson I placed the leisure tag in a relation. I should probably just remove the other tags as they are not really necessary.
32017-03-18 12:49:02 UTCmueschel The relation is fine, but those tags should be deleted if they are not needed. Maybe you want to keep one tag with an ID to be able to match this object again with your external data source.
Jan
12017-03-18 12:46:47 UTCmueschel Hi, you used the new key 'name:Zh_py' on 59 ways. the common version is 'name:zh_py', used 900 times already. Would you mind changing this?

Cheers, Jan
12016-10-30 12:57:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
5500 nodes have a misspelled tag "addrpostcode".
Btw, are you sure that the license of your source allows use for OSM? CC BY and ODbL are not compatible!

Jan
22016-10-30 13:46:15 UTCdan980-import Hi, we got this authorization letter: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/7/77/Autorizzazione_sardegna_openstreetmap.pdf
32016-10-30 13:50:19 UTCmueschel Alright, maybe you can add a remark on the wiki page?
42016-10-30 13:51:46 UTCdan980-import yes, I'm gonna update it as soon as possible
52016-10-30 14:01:25 UTCsabas88 CC-BY-SA isn't compatible, CC-BY is (provided we add a proper attribution on the changeset)
62017-03-17 21:38:03 UTCmueschel cc-by is not compatible. See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
(Doesn't affect this import, because of the explicit authorization)
12017-03-17 15:12:06 UTCToniE Danke, wieder ein typo von mir?
22017-03-17 19:29:53 UTCmueschel Aus "surfarce" habe ich "surface" gemacht - passiert nun mal beim Tippen.
12017-03-17 12:11:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4303618075

The tag ref`... = grid_bin doesn't look right.

Cheers, Jan
22017-04-17 09:42:56 UTCbrianboru Finger trouble! Thanks - corrected
12017-03-17 11:53:09 UTCmueschel Hi, the trees you add have a strange tag: "2016 = 298". I corrected some yesterday, but there are more you added today. I guess it should be "ref = 2016.298". Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan
12017-03-16 11:37:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480408120
The tag is wrong - and I don't know how to correct it. Looks like 'landuse = forest', but I can't see a forest here, just few individual trees.

Jan
12017-03-16 11:17:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added areas with strange tags that are not defined anywhere, like these:
area \tyes
area6 \tsubarea6
name \tsubarea6

What did you try to tag here? Some type of boundary? Please check the wiki on how to tag them properly, in the current state this data can not be interpreted by any sta...
22017-03-20 19:11:49 UTCHausemer Problem fixed!
12017-03-15 16:58:16 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check the tagging of some of the buildings, e.g.

buildingxx:floor should be floor:material
building:walls should be building:material
building:roof should be roof:material

Those tags are described in the wiki, please check the other tags as well.

Jan
12017-03-15 16:15:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 59 objects with the key 'bulding'. Would you mind fixing this? 'building'

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-14 11:51:58 UTCmueschel Do these streets really have the German name as part of their official name? If not, please use name:de for the German name.
Jan
12017-03-14 11:34:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the keys "vertical height", "vertical_height", "vertical_rise" to map the height difference of aerialways. These tags are not used in any other place. Typically, start and end node of the aerialway are tagged with 'ele' to mark their respective height.
\...
22017-03-14 18:05:15 UTCIrakli Ika Ok I will use ele insted, thank you.
12017-03-14 11:29:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
den Key 'wheelchair:approachable' gibt es bis jetzt noch nicht. Ich würde da einfach "wheelchair = yes" setzen, und wenn es noch eine Einschränkung gibt mit "wheelchair:description" arbeiten.

Gruß, Jan
22017-03-14 12:20:41 UTCPeilscheibe Hallo,
klar gibt's den, hier zum Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4732885191 ;-)
wheelchair=yes beschreibt die Benutzbarkeit eines Objekts mit dem Rollstuhl selbst, z. B. als Attribut an einem Fußgängerüberweg oder einer Toilette.
Nähmen wir als Beispiel nun mal d...
32017-04-23 06:35:24 UTCJPaulW Hey,
in dem Changeset sind ein paar Änderungen von track->path und track->service die ich absolut nicht nachvollziehen kann. Könntest du mal erklären was du gegen track an den Stellen hattest?
Viele Grüße
42017-04-23 08:36:21 UTCPeilscheibe Hallo JPaulW,

klar, gerne.
Zunächst haben wir in der Systematik in OSM eine Unterscheidung in Wirtschaftswege für land- bzw. forstwirtschaftlichen Verkehr (track - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack), die Widmung ist regelmäßig durch Beschilderung erk...
12017-03-14 11:17:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added the tag 'with' on 29 ways. It should be spelled 'width' - could you have a look and fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-03-17 15:22:57 UTCGuyVV Hi,
Bedankt voor het opmerken.
Hopelijk heb ik ze nu allemaal verbeterd.
Grt,
Guy
12017-03-13 21:28:43 UTCmueschel Hallo,
"fee:no = yes" - das Tag gibt es nicht. Entweder fee=yes oder fee=no, was stimmt?
Gruss, Jan
22017-03-13 22:02:47 UTCChemist72 Hast Recht, Jan. Sorry & danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit. Ich hatte es velwechsert mit payment:none=yes. Ist korrigiert. Es kostet nichts. Ist eh noch im Bau.
12017-03-13 21:23:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
found 3 ways with all strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480097548
Could you check & correct this?

Jan
22017-03-13 21:54:00 UTCEnigmaQuip Fixed, sorry about that
12017-03-13 21:21:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
schau dir mal das Tagging von diesem Way an, da ist was schiefgelaufen:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47435488

Gruss, Jan
22017-03-13 22:03:27 UTCbielebog Auha, das gehört _da_ nicht rein. Das war ein Cut'n Paste-Fehler. Gut gesehen, danke.
12017-03-13 19:14:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node? Looks weird.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4571244663

Jan
22017-03-14 00:37:24 UTCMacLondon Thanks Jan,
I have now corrected my completely mistyped entry to what I had intended to enter
12017-03-13 19:07:48 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used various spellings of the same key:
'physically _challenged'
'physically_challenged'
'physically_ challenged'
'physically challenged'
Please, use only one spelling, otherwise the data is rather useless. Also, please use tags that are already in use and don't invent new ones. 'physi...
12017-03-12 15:06:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
what are all these nodes? None of them has any tag. Could you check this and / or delete them?

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-12 13:01:34 UTCmueschel Hi,
are those 'meta' tags on this building really necessary? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436232310

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-12 12:46:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded 220 objects with the tag "Yess = Building". Could you correct this? 'building=yes' would be correct.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-12 12:36:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
On this node you used some non-English keys to describe the object: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4726295753

In OSM one must use common tags as described in the Wiki - otherwise the information can not be interpreted correctly by software. Please have a look to the wiki ...
12017-02-23 10:12:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
habe hier gerade ein paar 'backwart' in 'backward' korrigiert.

Und ein kleiner Tipp:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121635637
Die Angabe der Autobahn hier ist ein Fall für destination:ref:to und destination:symbol:to weil es sich um einen Hinweis auf eine zu erreichende, aber entfer...
22017-02-24 13:03:09 UTCsennewald63 Hallo mueschel,
danke für die Berichtigung von 'backward' .
Mite dem destination:ref:to und destination:symbol:to stehe ich auf Kriegsfuß, da es für mich zu unausgegoren ist.
Im Proposed features/Destination details https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination...
32017-02-24 18:04:32 UTCmueschel Hier hatte ich mal eine kleine Zusammenstellung im Wiki gemacht:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging

Mein Tool ist da sicher nicht das Maß der Dinge - ich rendere einfach das, was ich für wichtig halte. Zur besseren Darstellung sind die :to nur ein kle...
42017-03-10 19:10:38 UTCsennewald63 Ich habe mir deine Erklärungen unter "User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging" nochmal rein gezogen und dabei drei Probleme gefunden.
1. Du solltest mit angeben, dass auch "destination:symbol:to*" für die Einsortierung des entsprechenden Symbols notwendig ist.
2. Die Farbe b...
52017-03-11 13:55:09 UTCmueschel Lass uns das per Mail besprechen, ich schreibe dir gerade.
12017-03-10 08:17:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/253789222
There are several 'linz:' tags on thia node - was this a mistake?
Jan
22017-03-10 08:41:19 UTCworldwidewolford It looks like those tags predate my edit. I am on and have been editing on mobile, so any research you can do into those tags would be great, but they were not added by me.
Cheers
32017-03-10 15:55:24 UTCmueschel Before your edit the keys were in upper case, e.g. LINZ:layer. These are very common in NZ.
You changed it to lower case - might be a software issue with OsmAnd?
42017-03-10 20:31:14 UTCworldwidewolford Oh wow. This must be an issue with OsmAnd. I will send a bug report about that. Could you fix those tags for me? Thanks for picking that up.
52017-03-11 13:41:59 UTCmueschel Changed the tags back.
12017-03-11 13:37:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you added many buildings with the tag "addr:pro" which should be "addr:province". Could you have a look and fix that?
Cheers, Jan

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nqy
12017-03-10 09:27:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded a huge sset of objects, which are mainly tagged with foreign tags which most likely should not appear in Osm. Could you check and correct this?
Jan

Examples:
ACCESS_TYP=Open Access
ACRES=48.743
AGNCY_ID=1328
AGNCY_LEV=City
AGNCY_NAME=Scotts Valley, City...
22017-03-10 17:34:49 UTCstevea I wouldn't say "huge" as it is a few dozen edits over the course of a few hours in a single day (and I'm not done yet) against the over 12,000 edits I have entered over the last eight years.

Is your problem with "foreign tags?" I kept these in to distinguish these CPAD polygo...
32017-03-10 17:56:39 UTCmueschel I didn't complain about the import of the polygons as such. That's fine if it is done carefully.
I'd suggest to keep one ref tag only, like ref:CPAD. This should be sufficient to allow for future updates.

Other tags like ACRES and COUNTY are just redundant because they can easily be retrieved f...
42017-03-10 18:06:41 UTCstevea Thank you for your quick reply. I can certainly endeavor to reduce and/or conflate tags on future CPAD polygon entries, as I do agree that they do contain a large amount of metadata. Some is useful and some is not (to OSM) and as long as a polygon in OSM can be identified as mapping back to a uniq...
12017-03-10 09:35:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
I saw several keys with spaces in your edits. Please check the spelling of keys. Examples:

'fire operator' -> 'fire_operator'
'water tank: street' -> 'water_tank:street'
(and several more)
Jan
12017-03-10 09:29:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used some new landcover tags in your edits to specify density and age. I think it would be a good idea to describe these tags in the wiki by writing a proposal for them.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-10 14:15:16 UTCigitov Hi,
thanks for comment.
These landcover tags are still "raw", not final.
In the Russian-speaking OSM-community there is a discussion on the scheme for tagging landscapes (woodlands, shrubs, etc.). Much can change. Writing proposal still premature.
12017-03-10 09:23:44 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded almost 100 nodes with a spelling mistake: 'toilest' instead of 'toilets' - could you have a look an fix this?

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-10 09:22:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:21:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:20:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:20:17 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:19:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-10 09:19:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
12017-03-09 08:57:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
this node doesn't seem to be tagged right. Could you putsome common tags there?

Jan
12017-03-08 08:58:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
There are several ways with a lot of strange tags here, like 'gdforderen'. Could you check and fix this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-03-08 10:57:18 UTCLogicalViolinist Do you have a way id? I might have missed deleting the garbage from geobase/toporama if not I can try to look for it
32017-03-08 12:42:52 UTCLogicalViolinist Think I found it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478904955
I'll fix it up
42017-03-08 14:06:15 UTCmueschel Here is a link to overpass turbo:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nlu
3 ways left.

Thanks for taking care!
Jan
52017-03-08 14:43:59 UTCLogicalViolinist shouldn't be any left, thanks for the heads up :)
12017-03-07 13:17:03 UTCmueschel Hallo,
Ich habe hier öfters das Tag "parking:conditions" gefunden - das gibt es sonst nirgends. Du meinst sicher "access=...". Schaust du da nochmal drüber?

Gruß, Jan
22017-03-07 14:55:21 UTCKeineHeimat Hallo,
ich habe das feature hier gelesen: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking:lane#Definieren_der_Parkplatznutzung

Gruß,
Jan
32017-03-07 15:15:54 UTCmueschel Dieses Tag wird für Parkstreifen entlang von Straßen verwendet, nicht für Parkplätze. Mir ist es deswegen aufgefallen, weil du "conditions" mit "s" schriebst.
42017-03-07 19:15:22 UTCKeineHeimat Upps, ändere ich die Tage - bin im Moment unterwegs!

Gruß
Jan
12017-03-07 09:23:15 UTCmueschel Please don't change the established wikipedia tag to things like
described-in-wikipedia
described_in_wikipedia
listed_in_wikipedia
listed-in-wikipedia
and so on. Such changes have to be discussed first.

Jan
22017-03-07 14:20:17 UTCnyuriks Hi, you are right that they need to be more organized. I made a proposal for it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikipedia_tag_types

Also, thanks to wikidata, we can clean up wikipedia tags now (almost 2,000 already done):
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Yurik/OSM_wiki_t...
12016-08-19 12:51:08 UTCmueschel Hi,
der Key "healthcare_speciality" gibt es sonst nicht, das sollte "health_specialty:XYZ" heißen. Siehe
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/health_specialty#similar

Gruß, Jan
22016-08-19 17:43:57 UTCFischkopp0815 Danke, ich habe es korrigiert
32017-03-05 19:08:06 UTChighflyer74 Moin Ihr zwei!

Genau genommen muß es nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare getaggt werden. Also healthcare:speciality=*

Gruss aus HB!
42017-03-05 19:18:47 UTCmueschel Das ist ein "konkurrierendes" Tagging Schema. Beide sind ähnlich oft in Verwendung (etwa 11000 zu 7000) und beide sind im Wiki dokumentiert (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0/Specialties ) U.a. erlaubt es eine feinere Abstufung und einfacheres Taggen...
52017-03-06 05:48:10 UTChighflyer74 Moin Jan! Ja, richtig. Ich erinnere mich gerade wieder, das wir das Thema beim Bremer Treffen erörtert hatten, uns dann aber für das andere entschieden haben, da das von Dir angesprochene nie über den Proposal Status hinauskam. Eigentlich eine unhaltbare Situation für ein nicht g...
12017-02-26 12:44:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
you imported a lot of points with elevation data in this changeset.
Please note that the tagging is wrong and because of that these points can not be used in OSM. Elevations are tagged using the 'ele' key. Sources should be given in the changeset source tag, but not individually on each of th...
22017-02-26 15:12:54 UTCptal_io Thank you for the comment. I have removed the erroneous tags and added ele tags as well as source information to the changeset commit.
32017-03-05 15:48:21 UTCmueschel All the wrong tags are still there and have not been deleted.
42017-03-05 17:20:18 UTCptal_io Apologies. This has been rectified in changeset 46600439
12017-03-05 15:43:56 UTCmueschel Hi,
you essentially flooded a huge area by adding landuse=basin to large polygons. Also, most of the tags are from a foreign source and do not belong into the OSM database:
NUNIVOTTO6=843131
NUNIVOTTO7=8431311
Shape_Area=2.42385595961E8
Shape_Leng=79016.1029871
surface=2423...
12017-03-05 15:34:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please pay a bit of attention to the spelling of keys - I found various versions of the word "wheelchair" in your edits. With spelling mistakes these tags can not be understood by any software.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-05 13:31:59 UTCmueschel Hi,
17 of the nodes have the strange key "|ODS:nevenadres" - could you check that? Pipes in keys are not common.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-05 18:01:37 UTCde vries Yes I know, I'll fix it. I postponed fixing it for debug reasons .
12017-03-05 12:50:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tag on this way - was it a mistake?
Cheers, Jan

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477789206
22017-03-05 12:55:27 UTCFvGordon Please ask the creator of version 1.
Greetings, Franz
32017-03-05 13:15:41 UTCmueschel Sorry, I didn't see this changeset - but thanks to his changeset comment it is clear it should be 'source'.
12016-10-05 07:52:28 UTCAthalis Hallo greecemapper,

woher stammen denn die ganzen name Tags? Sicherlich nicht von Bing ;) Kannst du noch eine Quelle angeben (hier im Changeset Kommentar sollte reichen) damit das in Zukunft noch nachvollziehbar ist?
22017-03-05 12:44:19 UTCmueschel Sieht für mich so aus als sollten zumindest die Flurnamen revertiert werden solange die Legalität der Quelle nicht klar ist.
12017-03-03 20:50:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key 'Q' quite often in this changeset, what is it supposed to mean? Could you check and correct this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-04 14:25:12 UTCMr BA Demba corrigé
12017-03-03 20:44:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
Here are five ways with the tag "tt=both" - could you correct this?

Jan
22017-03-03 22:22:56 UTCMeredith Rider Thanks for catching that. I'll get it fixed!
Meredith
12017-03-02 11:49:32 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du diesen Node checken? "Düne = Düne" ist kein sinnvoll definiertes Tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4707353849

Gruß, Jan
12017-03-02 11:47:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this house?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287233238
The street name looks wrong and there is another tag that looks like a mistake.

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-02 12:23:09 UTCThunder08 Thank you! I fixed it.
12017-03-02 11:45:18 UTCmueschel Hallo modea,
willkommen bei OSM!
Du hast hier Hydranten eingetragen. Überlicherweise werden solche Objekte nur als Punkt und nicht als Linie eingetragen. Das Tag "hydrant=yes" wird leider von keiner Software verstanden. Schau mal im Wiki nach, dort ist erklärt wie Hydranten get...
22017-03-04 08:59:50 UTCanesthesia Halo modea,
du hast Gebäude doppelt (zb Hausnummer 33, 77 und 78) sowie Linien (ways) und Punkte (Nodes) ohne Tags erfasst.
Die Kapelle ist nun 3x vorhanden: einmal von mir; einmal von dir mit Tag und einmal ohne.

Güße,

32017-03-04 09:06:04 UTCanesthesia PS: du verwendest eine Uuuuuralte JOSM Version. die ist schon sechs Jahre alt. Eine aktuelle Version gibt es hier: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Download
12017-03-02 11:40:04 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du diesen Hydranten nochmal überprüfen? "fire_pressure" ist kein sinnvolles Tag. Außerdem werden Kommazahlen wie im Englischen mit Punkt geschrieben.
Gruß, Jan
22017-03-02 13:40:12 UTCkphklaus doofer Fehler, habe ich korrigiert.
viele Grüße
kph
12017-03-02 11:36:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this edit? You added a bus route that consists of a parking lot only.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7013865

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-02 11:33:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this area? Looks like something went wrong with the name tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317391337

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-02 13:37:05 UTCFredrikLindseth Ah, a typo. I fixed it now :-)
12017-03-02 11:31:56 UTCmueschel Hallo,
der Key "recycling:opening_hours" wird außer hier nirgends verwendet. Üblicherweise wird "opening_hours" ohne Prefix verwendet. Würdest du das anpassen?

Gruß, Jan
22017-03-02 12:10:19 UTCbezin Hi, ja, völlig richtig. Da hab ich gepennt. Passe ich an – auch für die Änderungen in Überruhr-Holthausen.
32017-03-03 08:31:52 UTCbezin Gilt entsprechend auch für recycling:operator, der so nicht existiert, sondern auch ohne Prefix verwendet wird. Auch das passe ich an.
12017-03-01 11:30:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the spelling of keys in your latest changesets? E.g. I saw
water tank :housenumber
water tank: housenumber
water tank:street

There should be no spaces in the key and 'water_tank' has an underscore.

Cheers, Jan
12017-03-01 11:26:54 UTCmueschel HI,
could you check the tagging of some of these objects? They have russian keys only and no common keys used in other places in OSM.
Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476958046

Cheers, Jan
22017-03-03 01:02:50 UTCJake Strine Yes, it's a mistake. Fixed.
12017-03-01 11:24:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Tagging schauen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4701196968
Da steht " 7710052 = underground"

Gruss, Jan
22017-03-01 12:08:47 UTCmentor2002 Sorry,
danke für den Hinweis... das hat sich der Copy - Paste Fehlerteufel eingeschlichen.
12017-02-28 15:13:35 UTCmuralito Would'nt it be better to use tag "rooms" instead of "number_of_apartments"?
22017-02-28 15:20:24 UTCmueschel I just corrected the obvious spelling mistake in the key.
'number_of_apartments' is already used 1800 times, so I consider it a valid tag. I don't know if there are cases where someone distinguished between number of rooms and number of apartments on a single object.
12017-02-28 11:57:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
if you want to tag names in foreign languages: The language has to be given as ISO-639 code, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cree_language has the code 'cr' and Innu has 'moe'.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-28 11:50:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. Most of the tags you put on this node are rather useless, because they don't follow established tagging styles. Please have a look to the Wiki, e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features. There is a list of common tags.

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-28 15:10:59 UTCmuralito And/Or maybe ask for help to the Iocal community.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India
12017-02-28 11:47:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this node?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2699648841
It has two contradicting tacticle_paving tags.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-28 11:41:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
I would like to point you to this Wiki page that describes how charging stations for electric cars can be tagged:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
Cheers, Jan
12017-01-20 11:42:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many foreign tags on 133 roads in your changesets, like these:
Cod_via=20478
Cod_viaOld=0
DUG=VIA
Etichetta=VIA PEZZALUNGA
ISTAT=63001.0
Lunghezza=130.94
Toponimo=PEZZALUNGA
Tratto=15
f_node=1346

They all look like they do not belong into the OSM database and were added by m...
22017-02-27 20:13:39 UTCmueschel I think that this changeset has to be reverted - we can not make sure that the license of this data is compatible with ODbL if you don't disclose your source.
12017-02-27 11:52:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
what is the meaning of the tag "hiter=ter" you put on several ways here?

Jan
22017-02-27 12:44:47 UTCff5722 That should be highway=tertiary
I sometimes make typos and JOSM keeps suggesting those until restart. I will correct it asap.
12017-02-27 11:50:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
you managed to get three spelling mistakes in this turn restriction: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6997873

Actually, you don't need this relation, it is better to add access tags to the short service way. E.g. access=emergency.
12017-02-27 11:48:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
this way got two distance tags, one is misspelled. Could you check which one is right?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3115311666

If there are two values given, you can add them to the same tag, separated by ';'

Jan
12017-02-27 11:46:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
all the objects have the tag "Horta = Vella" - was this a mistake?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-27 21:57:21 UTCpacopac Corrected! Was a mistake. Thanks for pay attention
12017-02-27 11:44:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used highway=project here - this tag is not used often. There are other values that are defined in the wiki, maybe you can change the tagging to one of these?
planned
proposed
preproposed
construction

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-27 13:27:43 UTCbibi6 Hi, I'm going to change these to "planned". Thanks ;)
32017-02-27 13:34:49 UTCbibi6 ... I actually decided to use "proposed", as the way may change - but it will probably not. Wait and see ^^
12017-02-26 13:08:47 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du hier nach dem Namen schauen? Da scheint etwas beim Tagging schiefgegangen zu sein.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38805790

Gruß, Jan
22017-02-26 17:21:45 UTCOF0 Ja, da war was schiefgegangen. Muss
name=Schönertsee
heißen. Habe es korrigiert.

Danke für den Hinweis.
12017-02-25 12:38:15 UTCmueschel Hi, could you check this way?
http://osm.org/way/30833729
Something went wrong with the name tag.
Cheers, Jan
12017-02-23 11:35:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the keys railway:date_start and :date_end. The usual key for this is railway:start_date and :end_date.
Could you have a look and correct this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-02-26 16:20:44 UTCsfrank Hi,
I fixed it. Was accidently used, because first I used date:start and date:end.
Frank
12017-02-23 11:23:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
these 62 buildings have a spelling mistake in the tags: 'add:province' instead of 'addr:province'. Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-24 15:26:08 UTCgiorosel Hi jan,
thanks for checking, i've already fixed it
12017-02-23 09:46:38 UTCmueschel Hi,
this changeset generated a lot of objects with a huge number of tags that are not documented and seem to have been added by mistake during this import.

Jan
22017-02-23 09:57:41 UTCBgabor Hi,
All 4000 points a certain water sources in the area and all attached attribute is important.
32017-02-23 10:02:50 UTCmueschel If this information is important, I suggest to use common tags that can be parsed by existing software.
Btw, I don't see a connection to hotosm project 2525 you mention in the changeset comment. Has this import of data been discussed on the appropriate mailing list? Is this data really 'open'? The...
42017-02-26 19:48:11 UTCedvac Hi:
If this is an import and haven't been discussed, it should be reverted inmediatly.
Imports have to be discussed with the local community and with the imports list, and should be documented and the source compatible with the ODbL.
52017-02-28 15:03:58 UTCmuralito No doubt it is an import. It should be reverted, or at least discussed, fixed and the resulting new tags documented.

62017-03-03 01:14:37 UTCedvac This import has been reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46535966
Please, read and follow the imports guidelines (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) before doing any import. Imports have to be documented, been given ODbL compatible permission by the copyright owners...
72017-03-07 23:31:18 UTCSomeoneElse Hello Bgabor,
Just to echo what has been said above - if you want to import data please do read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and follow the links from it.
If you've got any questions you can either mail the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org or ask on the "imports"...
82017-03-08 10:29:54 UTCBgabor Hi,

I will send a letter for the National Bureau of Statistics to Tanzania, and ask them to clarify the licenses for all data from http://opendata.go.tz/ website.

PS: thank you for your efforts...

Gabor
92017-03-08 12:05:29 UTCmuralito Hello Bgabor:

If the terms & conditions are the same as stated in http://opendata.go.tz/en/pages/kanuni-na-masharti , I'm not sure if the d) paragraph is compatible with ODbL.

Maybe in this case we need explicit permission from the owner to import their data into OSM.
102017-03-08 12:39:44 UTCSomeoneElse @Bgabor,
I'd suggest having this discussion on the "imports" list - there people will be able to advise you about licenses.
See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-February/004819.html for where this import was first mentioned there.
Best Regards,
Andy
12017-02-22 11:24:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this fire station? There seems to be some typing error I can't fix.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-21 12:15:15 UTCmueschel http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475067209
parking:lane:right:vertical = yes

Wirklich vertikal?
22017-02-22 11:29:32 UTCsoemisch Mueschel,

danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe den Datensatz in "perpendicular" korrigiert.

Viele Grüße, Lars
12017-02-21 10:15:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several buildings on top of already existing ones. Could you have a look and correct these mistakes?
Additionally, all tags you added have no meaning in OSM - only well-defined tags as described in the Wiki can be used. Examples:
Capacity \t=80
Condition \t=average
Levels \t=1
Pu...
12017-02-18 18:04:18 UTCmueschel Hi,
from this changeset there are still hundreds or thousand untagged and unconnected nodes in the database. As they are completely useless - could you take some time to clean this up?
Let me / the community now if you have trouble or need help!

Jan
22017-02-20 13:41:05 UTCIvan Garcia Could you send me the link of some ofthe unconnected nodes? I will take a look at it.
thks for the alert.
32017-02-20 13:50:27 UTCmueschel Here is a link to Keepright tool - this link just shows this type of unconnected node - you have to move the map to see more errors, only ~300 are shown at a time. Actually, they seem to be from different changesets, but all by 'importer2015'.

http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/keepright/report_map.php?z...
42017-02-20 14:07:36 UTCIvan Garcia You are right. I will have time from next week to remove those.
52017-03-04 22:34:45 UTCIvan Garcia All orphan nodes cleaned.
12017-02-19 09:33:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!

In your edits I saw some keys that contain non-english keys. All keys should be in English only and use the well-defined names described in the wiki.
Here is a list of these objects - could you have a look and correct them?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/mPE
Let me know if you...
12017-02-19 08:56:11 UTCmueschel Hi
welcome to OSM. You put many tags on the objects you added - but unfortunately they can't be used by any OSM based software. Most of the keys you used are not well-defined and are not understood by other users. Please have a look at the wiki to find out how e.g. buildings are commonly tagged.
\...
12017-02-18 18:08:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
it looks like you un-deleted a large number of nodes in this changeset, like
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3509954079/history
These nodes seem to be useless now. Could you have a look and remove them again? Let me / the community know if you need help!

Jan
12017-01-09 10:04:57 UTCmueschel Hallo,
no exit schreibt sich no_exit.

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-14 08:05:10 UTCmtbbiker99 Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis.

Geht so auch: noexit ?
Gruß Oliver.
32017-02-17 12:12:47 UTCmueschel Ja natürlich. noexit ist korrekt, ich weiß gar nicht mehr warum sich da ein _ in meinen Kommentar eingeschlichen hat.
Sorry für die späte Antwort, habe ich übersehen!
12017-02-17 12:11:18 UTCmueschel Kannst du hier mal drüberschauen? An vielen Objekten hängt jetzt eine Mailadresse als Tag (teilweise mehrfach)

Gruß, Jan
12017-02-17 11:58:48 UTCmueschel You (again) added many useless tags on buildings, e.g. here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363504576
You removed the valid tags and put new ones. All of these are useless for OSM because they don't follow normal tagging rules.

Jan
12017-02-16 21:29:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of your edits? In OSM, the Keys must be well defined, like "name=". For example you wrote
زمین والیبالname=زمین والیبال روستا
this should be:
name=زمین والیبال روستا
And several other, similar ones. Could you f...
12017-02-16 21:26:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the key "bycycle" 20 times in these edits. Could you fix the spelling - "bicycle"?
Cheers, Jan
12017-02-16 21:09:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
this node has the tag "Stupava = Svätý Jur" which looks like a mistake. Could you check that?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/530544357
Jan
22017-02-17 08:26:48 UTCwmyrda Hi,
It is indeed. Not sure what I meant there, but probably just a copy&paste error when I wanted to add "name:pl=Svätý Jur" just like the name in polish Wikipedia is. I'll fix that one to it.
12017-02-16 21:08:09 UTCmueschel Hallo,
schau mal nach dieser Plattform, da hat das Tagging Tippfehler:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261111877

Gruss, Jan
22017-02-16 21:12:00 UTCWeltstaat allerdings!
Danke, habs ausgebessert.
Grüsse, Jonathan
12017-02-16 21:02:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier hast du den Key "Dorfkirche" verwendet - sollte das ein name-Tag werden?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326815203
12017-02-16 21:02:25 UTCmueschel Hi,
hier hast du den Key "Dorfkirche" verwendet - sollte das ein name-Tag werden?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326815203
12017-02-16 21:01:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
am Node 73580256 hängt ein komisches Tag:
Burgkapelle = Burgwiese

Gruß, Jan
22017-02-16 21:29:27 UTCNetzwolf Copy+Paste & v(Finger)>v(Hirn) → Unfug
Ist getilgt. Danke für den Hinweis.

Mehr Spaß mit Attributen gibt's täglich frisch hier:
http://geo.netzwolf.info/csv/bad_attributes_k_eq_v.csv.bz2
http://geo.netzwolf.info/csv/bad_attributes_k_norm.csv.bz2
http://geo.netzwolf...
12017-02-16 12:49:21 UTCmueschel Could you check the tagging? "Gegevens =Binnenwegplein" looks like a mistake.
Jan
12017-02-16 12:39:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
this node got the key "no_end". Did you mean no_exit?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4682479131
Cheers, Jan
12017-02-16 11:49:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many buildings with the tag "building=yes=house" - could you fix that? "building = house" would be correct.

Jan
12017-02-15 08:47:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
you uploaded some buildings with a missing building=yes tag. Also, there are some with two building:levels tags, one is misspelled. Could you have a look and fix these issues?

Jan
12017-02-14 21:30:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of tags, e.g. "destinarion = Ponta Grossa, Retorno"
I found several times a spelling mistake in 'destination' or ':lanes' - I corrected them where I found them.
Secondly, the normal separator between destinations is a ';', not a comma.

Ch...
12017-02-14 21:02:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found keys like "destination:lanes:ref" in your edits. The correct order is "destination:ref:lanes" - :lanes comes at the end. I fixed that for you.

Here is a generic string to show the order for all those suffixes:
key[:subkey][:hgv|:bicycle|...][:lanes][:forward|:bac...
22017-02-16 12:23:38 UTCmweper Oops. Thanks for notifying me and fix it. I did not realize.
12017-02-14 19:00:46 UTCmueschel Hi,
you tagged 90 buildings with "building:levell=1" - could you correct the spelling mistake ('levels' instead of 'levell' )?

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-14 18:59:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
you tagged 20 buildings with "building;material=cement_block" - could you correct the spelling mistake (';' instead of ':' )?

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-14 18:56:52 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "AlYf=Recordings" on many nodes. This tag is not used in any other place. I don't know what it means. Could you check if there is another way to tag this?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-21 16:29:11 UTCshirasayu Corrected
12017-02-13 11:42:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "tire=yes" on this building:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370563749
It looks like spelling mistake, could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-13 19:09:22 UTCalexhyd18 Hello. Thanks for attention.
If it looks like mistake, then what I must write to indicate the presence of tire correctly?
32017-02-13 19:12:52 UTCmueschel Can you describe what it is? A shop where you can buy tires? That would be shop = tyres
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtyres
42017-02-13 19:17:51 UTCalexhyd18 It's a place where where anyone can make a mountage of tires
52017-02-13 19:32:59 UTCmueschel Ok, now I got it. I would tag it as:

shop = car_repair (Even if it is not a shop - to give the category of the object)
service = tyres
self_service = yes
fee = no / yes
description = (describe it in your own words, Russian is fine)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dcar
12017-02-13 11:48:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this object?
http://osm.org/way/473866994
The tag doesn't look right:
Mahall Türkerler=government
12017-02-13 11:38:42 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put a non-standard tag in Russian language on this node. Unfortunately this doesn't help OSM, because software can only understand well-defined tags. Could you have a look to the OSM wiki to find a better suited tag for this? man_made=pier could be one of them.
22017-02-14 14:47:14 UTCPavel_TCH Thank you for your note
12017-02-13 11:32:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You put the tag "clinica = yes" on this building:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402795000

Unfortunately, this is not really useful, because the tag is not well-defined and no software can understand it. Please have a look to the wiki how hospitals need to be ma...
12017-02-12 13:47:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
kannst du hier nochmal nach dem Kreisel schauen? Der ist irgendwie zweispurig getaggt. Und ist das wirklich so gedacht, dass die Straße im Norden nicht angeschlossen ist?
http://osm.org/way/321022076

Gruß, Jan
22017-02-12 21:44:18 UTChca Hej!
Die lanes waren ein Überbleibsel des früheren Straßenverlaufs (vor dem Bau des Kreisels), das ich vergessen hatte. Habe ich entfernt -- danke für den Hinweis!
Was mit der Straße im Norden -- Hünfelder Straße -- werden soll, weiß ich auch nicht. Als...
12017-02-12 13:10:40 UTCmueschel "Privatweg", "Seltsame Kirr-Konstruktion", "Jagdfläche"... das sind alles keine Namen von Objekten.
12017-02-11 12:33:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "destination:tag" that is not used in any other place. Could you explain the meaning or find another common tag?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-13 09:35:12 UTCinah_telenav Hi
Sorry I missed understood, I was suppose to put destination:street.
I uploaded the reviewed version.
12017-02-11 12:27:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
You created many objects without any tag describing what it is. Could you review these changes and add tags like those described in the Wiki?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-11 12:25:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM.
You created many objects without any tag describing what it is. Could you review these changes and add tags like those described in the Wiki?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-10 11:52:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many POIs with tags like these:
Categoria=B
Denominaci=peluqueria manicura spa
Nombre=STAR COIFFURE
Numero=3
Tipo=CYS

These are rather useless because the tagging does not follow the established schemes. They can't appear on any map unless you use normal tags...
12017-02-09 12:08:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
please trace buildings a bit more carefully - there are no buildings here of the size and shape you draw them. Most of the actual buildings were already mapped by others. I reverted your changeset to clean this up.
Jan
12017-02-09 11:51:50 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this relation? The tag "tt = no" looks like a mistake.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/969201

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-09 12:11:24 UTCPetr1868 opraveno
12017-02-09 11:45:36 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the tag "crown_type: = I" on ~13 trees. Could you correct this mistake (there is no ':' in the key?
22017-02-09 12:54:52 UTCLucFreitas Thanks. Fixed in changeset 45946425.
12017-02-08 15:13:28 UTCrskedgell I can find a reference for xxx:inscription_date=* in the wiki, when used in combination with heritage=* and heritage_operator=xxx, where xxx is the abbreviation for the operator, in this case he for Historic England - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage#Tags_to_use_in_combination
...
22017-02-08 15:31:07 UTCmueschel Oh, you're right.
To me this looked like the typical mistake when autocompletion failed. On the same POIs you used heritage:* as well, so this made it rather plausible. "heritage:operator" and "heritage:inscription_date" formed a nice group of tags and made a lot of sense.

I...
32017-02-08 19:48:13 UTCmueschel Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45928032
12017-02-08 12:01:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
in the last weeks I found this tag rather often:
he:inscription_date
I think it should be
heritage:inscription_date

Could it be a copy and paste problem?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-08 15:31:48 UTCrskedgell The "Tags to use in combination" table in the wiki article for the key heritage at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage#Tags_to_use_in_combination has:
heritage:operator=*\txxx\tsee table under abbreviation
and
xxx:inscription_date=*\t\tDate when the object was added to the ...
32017-02-08 15:32:34 UTCmueschel For the records:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45431514

he:inscription_date is correct.
42017-02-08 15:52:36 UTCrskedgell Thanks - it's perhaps not the most obvious tagging scheme and probably did look a lot like a typo.
12017-02-08 11:39:35 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the key "Village tract" on many objects - this is not a defined tag in OSM. What is its purpose?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-08 12:32:26 UTCОлег Самуйлов Hi,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Village_tract
Cheers
32017-02-08 14:55:47 UTCmueschel Ah, I see.
The key you used doesn't fit well into the usual tagging schemes.
What is used quite often are keys like
is_in:township or
is_in:ward

I didn't find some established tagging of village tracts right now. So, I would suggest for your purpose:
is_in:tract or
is_in:villagetract
...
12017-02-08 12:06:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
please update your maps.me app. Yours has a bug and adds a wrong tag:
"banner_url = https://is.gd/UoIIyn"
12017-02-08 11:56:26 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag recycling:Emballages =yes - tags should always be in English. An often used key is
recycling:plastic_packaging
Does it fit?

Jan
12017-02-07 22:56:02 UTCFortepc There was no reason to remove those tags. They were accurate information relevant to the POIs they were attached to.
22017-02-08 11:49:11 UTCmueschel see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45848069
OSM is not a map of non-existing graphics in some game.
32017-02-08 17:27:39 UTCFortepc I was not mapping ingame graphics. I was tagging real world objects referencing that they also exist in the ARG. It's just as relevant as referencing their facebook pages that you didn't remove.
12017-02-06 11:35:47 UTCmueschel Please stop adding ingress and pokemon features. OSM does not contain such ficitional objects.
22017-02-07 22:52:17 UTCFortepc @Mueschel you're suggesting OSM doesn't contain Freedom Park? you're sorely mistaken. Sorry for the confusion but my changeset updated the accuracy of the park on the ground, as well as added relevant information in the tags.

Thanks for your concern, but try again next time with that high horse ...
32017-02-08 11:42:34 UTCmueschel Is Freedom Park fictional? Can I see it when walking there? So yes, it should be in OSM. Can I see Pokemons when I walk there? No, they are just existing in a software on your mobile phone.

Thanks for not insulting other mappers.
42017-02-08 17:27:04 UTCFortepc I was not mapping "Pokemons" I was tagging the park as also being represented in the Augmented Space, the same as you'd tag the park's website or social pages, or any of the many tags on this part that are a non-physical fact about the park.
52017-02-08 17:30:03 UTCFortepc Look at my edit history, I'm not some token kid trying to vandalize the map. I care about accuracy. I'm seeking to use my local knowledge to map with the greatest accuracy possible. With as much information about the POIs as possible.
62017-02-08 18:29:34 UTCNakaner Hi Fortepc,

adding arg:ingress=portalfarm, arg:pokemongo=pokestopfarm and arg:pokemongo_1=nest does not meet our guidelines about verifiability (also known as the "On The Ground Rule"). Please only add information to OpenStreetMap which everyone can VERIFY ON THE GROUND.

https://wiki...
72017-02-08 18:30:46 UTCNakaner PS Freedom Park has a very strange tagging with dozens of uppercase keys which also is against our rules but that does not make your edits better. The edit which added those uppercase keys might be treated the same way as you.
82017-02-09 17:19:12 UTCFortepc @Nakaner, Yes. I am very familiar with the OSM's on the ground rule. But rule is for mapping things, not adding information to the tags of things. And I am also following all of the rules present on the Pokemon Go blogpost you referred to. I'm improving accuracy of what is on the ground, as well as ...
12017-02-08 11:38:10 UTCmueschel Hi,
you used the tag "Building features=building" on 207 buildings - this is not a defined tag in OSM. What is its purpose?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-08 14:39:52 UTCBgabor Well, seems by mistake - mixed the tag what was used in ID.
12017-02-07 12:25:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't add junction=roundabout to circular streets without knowing the situation on ground. E.g. this one is no roundabout (as described in the german note on it)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25444119

Also, all your tags have a spelling mistake 'jonction' instead of 'junction'
12017-02-07 11:51:15 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are ~15 ways with a spelling mistake "shouder" instead of "shoulder". Could you have a look?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-07 13:02:57 UTCkre3d Oops. Should be better now. Thanks for pointing it out!
12017-02-05 21:58:44 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier vor einiger Zeit Relationen angelegt, denen das type-Tag fehlt. Kannst du das noch ergänzen?
Gruß, Jan

z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4139718
22017-02-06 08:44:39 UTCNakaner Hallo Jan,

in meinen Augen (als Eisenbahnmapper) sind die Inhalte dieser Relation nicht vor Ort überprüfbar und genügen daher nicht den Anforderungen, die an Objekte gestellt werden, die in OSM eingetragen werden. Mit "Lupe Neuostheim" ist höchstwahrscheinlich eine D...
12017-02-05 21:44:05 UTCmueschel Wurde hier die Ampel tatsächlich wieder abgebaut?
http://osm.org/node/339513244
Vor ein paar Monaten war sie noch da.
12017-02-05 21:30:31 UTCmueschel Hallo Michael,
ist zwar schon lange her, aber: Was befindet sich eigentlich an den "Planeten-"Knoten? Nur ein Name ist so nichtssagend. Eine Informationstafel oder so? Dann könnte man das entsprechend taggen.
Gruß, Jan
12017-02-05 21:28:00 UTCmueschel Hallo,
vorher stammen diese Namen? Informationen aus anderen Karten dürfen in der Regel nicht verwendet werden (Lizenzen!)

Außerdem stimmt das Tagging so nicht: Ein Knoten nur mit einem "name"-Tag beschreibt nicht, um was es sich handelt.

Gruß, Jan
12017-02-05 14:19:09 UTCmueschel Hi,
why did you remove all the good tags again and re-added many tags that don't seem to belong to OSM?

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-05 18:29:22 UTCaiwetir The border on the portion of the Winema National Forest in this region http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?#map=16/43.0869/-121.8861 appears to be backwards, it shows landuse forest on the basemap but when editing, the border is on the land around the forest. I reverted to make sure it wasn't somethi...
32017-02-05 18:33:56 UTCmueschel JOSM shows the marker on the wrong side, because there is no way to decide which is the right one by looking at one outer way only. As soon as you download the whole multi-polygon, it switches to the correct side.
There is no "backwards" with respect to the direction of outer ways of mult...
42017-02-05 18:40:08 UTCaiwetir I saw that just now in JOSM, I was obviously editing on the web application. When you look at it on the web application it indeed looks backwards whether there is a backwards or not.
52017-02-05 19:04:39 UTCmueschel The problem is the same for both editors, they just can't decide what is inner and outer without loading the full relation - in case of iD I don't know if this is even possible. When handling huge multi-polygons like this, JOSM is a much better choice. E.g. because you can selectively load the fores...
62017-02-05 19:40:16 UTCaiwetir I could use help, changing all the tags is easy enough but I just took a closer look at the overlapping areas and it's pretty complex. First, large areas of the Gilchrist and Deschutes overlap, then the borders should probably be fixed up so the nodes align to ways or other nodes (that's easy enoug...
72017-02-05 20:25:59 UTCaiwetir As it turns out, much has changed in that region since a land purchase just a few years ago. I'm going to delete the Gilchrist and start anew with new shapefiles.
12017-02-05 14:15:16 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node? Looks like something went wrong with copy and paste.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-05 12:57:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
the tagging of this node doesn't seem right.
It is now a sports center, a group home, a foundation and a locality in the same place.
Could you correct this?
Jan
12017-02-04 15:32:00 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added 45 villages with some strange tags, was this a mistake?
E.g.
CODE94X=903035
GLOBAL=0
PRIORITY=NONE
VILLAGE_ID=5826
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4227632087

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-04 15:39:01 UTCkatpatuka hopefully not ;)

The names are from the 11000 villages file mentioned on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Laos/RoadsRiversBoundaries
32017-02-04 15:41:12 UTCmueschel I didn't mean adding the villages, just these tags. They don't look like they belong to OSM and are not used in other places.
42017-02-04 16:52:19 UTCkatpatuka well yes - they are in the original file and I left them as is - comparable to other for osm useless tags like gns:dsg etc. originating from imports
12017-02-04 15:28:44 UTCmueschel Hallo,
hier sind 8 Wege ohne Tags entstanden, kannst du da nochmal nachschauen? z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/385145640

Gruß, Jan
12017-02-04 15:02:17 UTCmueschel Hallo,
hier ist etwas schiefgegangen, die Wege habe alle keinerlei Tags. Kannst du da nochmal drüberschauen?

Gruß, Jan
12017-02-04 12:29:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of these two buildings? There is a strange tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114516260
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306543826

Cheers, Jan
22017-02-06 18:31:36 UTCnhdr Oops sorry, it was my mistake. I fixed it already. Thank you)
12017-02-03 13:21:15 UTCmueschel http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29110888
maxspeed 80 oder 90? Da ist ein tag zu viel.

Gruß, Jan
22017-02-03 17:14:23 UTCLinie29 Danke für den Hinweis! Habe auf den richtigen "maxspeed:backward"-Tag korrigiert.
12017-02-03 12:00:27 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added many ways with "Highway" or "Higway" tags - could you correct these? Only 'highway' is a valid key.

Cheers, Jan
12017-02-03 11:48:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
can you check the tagging of this way? Looks strange...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470722745

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-31 11:34:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
it's nice to see that you put a lot of effort in mapping destinations. Unfortunately, there is nobody who can use this data, because your tagging style is not documented and used only by you. Why don't you join the common tagging scheme which is successfully used thousands of times all over the...
22017-01-31 18:36:29 UTCyopaseopor The System and the whole scheme is not ready to put it in the wiki so work is in progress. I am mapping complete traffic signs (not only destination traffic signs), but also destinations (which has a clearer scheme) so the actual scheme is getting too little and simple. Traffic signs are being rende...
32017-01-31 18:52:07 UTCmueschel All the tags listed in this project are well-described in the wiki.

Take the node from this changeset as example: I have absolutely no clue why there is a need to list a single destination 15 times on a simple two-lane road like this.
I strongly suggest to ask the communicty for comments before ...
42017-01-31 23:45:32 UTCyopaseopor Ok you win. Please read this. Good night. http://yopaseopor.blogspot.com.es/2017/01/yomapeo-ok-you-win.html
52017-02-03 11:42:01 UTCmueschel "Then hell break loose" - Just because people remind you on the way things should be done in OSM? Have fun putting tags on nodes - nobody will be able to make any use of them as long as you don't write documentation for it.
62017-02-03 19:06:00 UTCyopaseopor Thank you for your help :S
72017-02-05 18:14:57 UTCyopaseopor https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_traffic_signs_tagging
12017-01-17 11:48:12 UTCmueschel Could you please stop adding your personal fantasy about tagging again and again and stop vandalizing OSM data?
22017-01-17 21:43:55 UTCtrial +1, please at least describe what you want to do. Except BS I mean.
32017-02-02 16:59:13 UTCStereo Of course it's partly meant as a joke. At the SotM EU, we came across this strange box, and decided to dedicate it as a monument to RichardF. The RichardF box does exist, and the physical properties are all correct. Someone even slapped a "Surveyed by OSM" sticker on it.

It is an exampl...
42017-02-02 18:12:20 UTCmueschel And this "joke" now renders on every map as a huge pile of Unicode garbage, gives errors because of incorrect units in the height tag and service_times that don't follow the documented tagging rules.
52017-02-02 19:38:24 UTCtrial Not on every map, http://b.tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=20&lat=49.0107&lon=8.38717&layers=B0000000FFFFFF renders it properly. Both renderers are based on the same stack.
But please move your tests to http://www.opengeofiction.net/#map=5/51.500/-0.100 and add the link or the Wiki so that ...
62017-02-02 19:50:58 UTCmueschel The name:fr tag, which is rendered by openstreetmap.fr doesn't contain the Unicode stuff. The default osm.org map shows the Unicode properly, too. But tag is just a collection of Unicode weirdness without any meaning.
72017-02-02 20:03:12 UTCtrial Right. Time to cleanup!
12017-02-02 11:28:28 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this road?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46039701

The name tag is somehow strange.
22017-02-02 14:33:38 UTCgezginrocker I've corrected it, thanks for your attention.
12017-02-02 07:52:19 UTCeric_ Whitehouse Terrace being part of the north side of Grange Loan, I changed it into name:left as it was originally (i.e. before a contributor changed it into name:South Side). Thanks anyway to have spotted this error.
22017-02-02 09:19:48 UTCmueschel Thanks! I'm sorry for the mistake but I forgot to check the history of the way...
32017-02-21 19:16:18 UTCeric_ No problem (sorry to answer so late).
12017-01-31 12:04:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
there is no need to translate tags like "tourism:fr = chambres d'hôte" - The translation is the same for all tourism = guest_house tags world-wide and can be done automatically by the software showing the data.

Jan
22017-02-01 11:10:02 UTCphilh-591 Thank you for your comment. I'll remove the unnecessary tag.

However, I'll carry on tagging specifically bakers' shops in France as
shop:fr = boulanger, patissier
or
shop:fr = pain, patissier
according to whether the shop displays "Boulanger" or "Pain". This i...
32017-02-01 11:46:17 UTCmueschel Sure, if it provides additional information, an additional tag makes sense.

As you describe a sub-group of bakeries, I would opt for a tagging like this:
shop = bakery
bakery = boulanger
42017-02-04 14:33:33 UTCphilh-591 OK. Actually I'll find out if the French User Group have a recommended practice on tagging for bakeries. If not, I'll put forward the method
shop=bakery; bakery=boulanger
shop=bakery; bakery=dépôt de pain
52017-02-04 16:29:50 UTCtrial http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:shop%3Dbakery
mueschel advice is good. Prevent using multiple keys as long as possible.
So if needed; I would add:
produced_on_site = yes/no
craft=backery.
pastry=yes...
See [OSM-talk-fr]
12017-01-31 15:48:03 UTCmueschel Hallo,
das Tag "maxstay@Mi,Sa = 60" funktioniert so nicht, weil nicht per Software auswertbar.
Besser ist:
maxstay:conditional = 60 @ (We,Sa)
oder noch besser, mit Einschränkung auf den tatsächlichen Zeitraum, oder gilt das 24 Stunden?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-31 15:58:43 UTCKartoGrapHiti Vielen Dank. Ich hatte im Wiki nicht verstanden, wie man es einträgt. Jetzt habe ich versucht, es zu korrigieren: maxstay:conditional=60 @ (We,Sa 07:00-14:00)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45689146#map=19/50.58734/8.67796

Wenn das noch nicht ganz stimmt, bitte gerne korrigieren....
32017-01-31 16:02:12 UTCmueschel Passt. Zeitangaben lassen sich wie üblich hier testen:
http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=We%2CSa%2007%3A00-14%3A00&DATE=1485878400000&lat=48.7769&lon=9.1844&mode=0
12017-01-31 11:57:22 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was meinst du mit "chocker:right"?
Klingt für mich eher nach traffic_calming:forward.

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-31 14:54:42 UTCgeri-oc traffic_calming:*=chocker ist aber nicht im WIKI dokumentiert - deshalb hatte ich chocker=right als ergänzende Information zu gefügt. Ist für mich auch eine einfacher Auswertung, da ich nicht nach allen Varianten suchen muss. Es ist eine kleine Pflanzinsel im Fahrbahnbereich.
Bild un...
32017-01-31 15:13:12 UTCmueschel :forward/:backward und :left/:right sind bei den wenigsten Tags explizit dokumentiert, machen aber generell bei allen Straßeneigenschaften Sinn.

Ob bei einem choker dieser Art ein traffic_calming:right oder traffic_calming:forward besser ist, weiß ich aber auch nicht. Hängt meine...
42017-01-31 15:44:38 UTCgeri-oc Ich würde es so lassen, da es auch mehrfach verwendet wird:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/choker#values

PS: chocker in choker geändert - ist mir an zwei stellen aufgefallen
12017-01-31 12:06:07 UTCmueschel Hi,
found two ways with the tag 'roof:redge' - is this roof:edge or roof:ridge?

Jan
22017-01-31 16:21:00 UTCcarlosz22 Hi.
Ops, my mistake :)
Corrected. Thanks for the advice.
Carlos
12017-01-31 11:55:54 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du hier das Tagging prüfen? 80 = 100 ist ein merkwürdiges Tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469609025
22017-01-31 15:10:35 UTCAmiral Fromage Hallo,
ich werde im nächsten Änderungssatz den Tag entfernen, danke für den Hinweis!
Ebenso werde ich fehlende Langsamfahrsignale ergänzen.
12017-01-31 11:54:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4640145541

313 = 314 is a strange tag.

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-31 13:47:49 UTCBratananio Thanks for helping to correct this mistake.

I've just corrected it.
12017-01-31 11:43:02 UTCmueschel Hallo,
man_made:levels finde ich jetzt nicht so gelungen als neuen Tag - Stockwerke hat so eine Säule ja nicht.

Außerdem gibt es eher keinen Grund hier einen eigenen Namespace mit man_made: zu benutzen - auf was sollte sich height sonst beziehen?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-31 17:29:00 UTCJojo4u Ja die "Stockwerke" waren schon als building unpassend und habe ich jetzt entfernt. Geblieben ist nur man_made:part=yes.
12017-01-30 11:27:41 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found the key "noezit" on several ways. Could you correct the spelling and move the tag to the last node of the way? (noexit is usually not put on the whole way, but just on the last unconnected node)
22017-01-31 17:16:23 UTCpaulbe done !
12017-01-30 09:44:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you define these two tags differently?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3213092963
opening_hours_비수기=AM 09:00 ~ AM 12:00
opening_hours_성수기=AM 08:00 ~ AM 1:00 (성수기)

What does '비수기' mean? Tags must be in English, otherwise they can not be understood by softw...
12017-01-30 09:41:39 UTCmueschel Hallo,
diese beiden Tags passsen nicht zum parking:lane-Schema. Kannst du da nochmal nachschauen?
parking:left:free = *
parking:right:residents = *
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane

Gruß, Jan
12017-01-27 11:48:49 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put several strange tags on these objects, like these:
heightBe_1 =m
heightBelo =3
numberOfFl =0
numberOf_1 =1

Could you convert them to well-defined tags?
Jan
22017-01-27 12:03:27 UTCtaborda Fixed :)
32017-01-30 09:34:29 UTCmueschel Looks like your fix wasn't uploaded correctly, the tags are still there.
12017-01-30 09:01:51 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
The hotel you added is already present in OSM:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1535788924
I deleted your new node because objects should be mapped only once.
12017-01-29 22:19:55 UTCmueschel Hallo,
aus welcher Quelle stammen diese Gebäudeumrisse? Hast du sichergestellt, dass die Lizenz dafür mit OSM / ODbL kompatibel ist?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-30 11:18:25 UTCstvmz backes Hallo,
ich bin Mitarbeiterin des Bauamts der Stadt Mainz. Die Stadt Mainz hat sich entschlossen, in die Pflege der Hausnummern und Gebäude in OSM einzusteigen. Die Gebäudeumrisse stammen aus eigenen Daten der Bauakte, sowie eigenen Luftbildern. Die Stadt Mainz prüft zur Zeit die Frei...
32017-01-30 12:12:04 UTCPolarbear Hallo stvmz backes, das ist ja wunderbar, dass ihr da auch selbst aktiv werdet. Die Nutzungsberechtigung eurer Daten und die Art des Zugangs müsste aber dokumentiert werden, und es muss erkennbar sein, dass der Erteiler der Erlaubnis dazu auch berechtigt ist. Ich empfehle hierzu den Kontakt zu ...
12017-01-29 14:53:06 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please explain the edits you made? Most of the keys you used are not defined and used nowhere else:
bibliographicCitation =ISSN 1927-0488 E-ISSN 1927-0496
nameAccordingTo = http://www.tropicos.org/Name/1701853
plot \tPlotLagoas15
references =http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v2n3p115...
22017-01-29 18:39:29 UTCnaoliv Markus, talvez você queira utilizar as tags corretas para representar as informações?
Por exemplo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:genus e/ou https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species e/ou https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:taxon
Se precisar de alguma ajuda pa...
12017-01-29 14:37:19 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469031630

24 = service looks like a mistake and I think the house number is wrong.

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-29 14:34:01 UTCmueschel Was soll uns das Tag "bug concat dup Road =yes" sagen?
22017-01-30 09:45:10 UTCkräckel C&P versehen
falscher Wert, ist berichtigt
Grüße & Danke
12017-01-28 16:56:05 UTCmueschel Hi Chris,
don't forget about the tag traffic_signals:direction on intersections like this with individually mapped traffic lights.
Jan
12017-01-28 16:51:33 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please note that all keys you use to identify an object needs to be in English - everything else is not understood by the software and is not shown on maps. Have a look to the wiki ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org ) to find the common tags.

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-27 11:56:39 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this way? If it is a road, please add a highway-Tag.
What is the meaning of the tag "Limpieza Lunes =equipo 1"?

Jan
12017-01-27 11:54:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put two uncommon tags on this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4629999312
maxspeed:2:forward =20
side =right

Could you change them to well-defined tags so that the information can be understood by software?

Jan
12017-01-27 11:50:11 UTCmueschel Hi,
you put the key "name:Ko_rm" on many objects - the correct spelling is "name:ko_rm". I just fixed that.

Jan
12017-01-27 11:41:31 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added several buildings on top of already existing ones. Could you have a look and correct these mistakes?
Additionally, you added many tags which have no meaning in OSM - only well-defined tags as described in the Wiki can be used. Examples:
Building \tYes
Capacity \t1000
Condtition \t...
12017-01-26 12:02:13 UTCmueschel Hallo,
kannst du bei den alten Namen und Datumsangaben mit dem richtigen Format arbeiten? z.B. 1900-01-01--2000-12-31
Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Date_namespace
Sonst sind die Daten leider ziemlich nutzlos.
Gruß, Jan
22017-01-26 12:09:31 UTCjengelh Gut zu wissen! Werde ich dann noch anpassen, danke.
12017-01-25 12:31:45 UTCmueschel Hi,
may I point you to this proposal for mapping lane connections?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/transit
It's 'just' a proposal, but already used in some places.
Cheers, Jan
12017-01-25 12:24:02 UTCmueschel Hallo,
du hast hier sehr viele Häuser mit dem Tag "Wirling = 8" hochgeladen, kannst du das korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan
22017-01-25 15:13:00 UTCgerhard81 Hallo Jan! Danke ans aufmerksam machen. Ich kümmere mich die Tage darum.
Grüße Gerhard
12017-01-25 12:19:40 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this parking lot?
This tag is strange: capacity:disabledy = street_lamp
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467673707

Cheers, Jan
12017-01-25 12:15:06 UTCmueschel There are again 1500++ buildings with wrong tags. Could you fix the tagging before uploading to OSM? There is just no need to distribute this information to hundreds of users and then changing it a few days later.

addr_num
addr_stree
shrt

Btw, the source given in your changeset is wrong.
22017-01-25 23:59:32 UTCAndrew Matheny Fixed. These are fields that are dropped/mapped to OSM tags before import, but it sometimes doesn't happen with the repetitive process :)
12017-01-24 22:06:06 UTCmueschel Bitte nicht blind "junction = roundabout" an jede kreisförmige Straße schreiben. Wendehämmer sind keine Kreisel.
22017-01-24 22:57:58 UTCLothar Schiborr_1 Stimmt, war Blödsinn. Ist zwar eine Wendestelle, gebaut wie
mini_roundabout. Was ist richtig.
Wendestelle oder Minikreisel
32017-01-24 23:35:15 UTCmueschel Wenn keine Schilder stehen, ist es weder ein roundabout noch ein mini-roundabout. Entweder ein node mit highway=turning_loop oder einfach eine ringförmige Straße - kreisförmig würde ich sie allerdings in der Regel eher nicht machen, mehr wie ein Tropfen oder ein "P" ge...
42017-01-25 12:19:02 UTCLothar Schiborr_1 Hier würde ich ihn als Kreis lassen wie er ist, bildet die Wirklichkeit ab
12017-01-24 22:10:38 UTCmueschel Hallo,
geht dieser Kreisel wirklich in die falsche Richtung?
http://osm.org/node/254598207

Jan
22017-01-24 22:22:44 UTCblauer_elefant k.A.; ich habe auf den bing-Luftbildern gesehen, dass dort ein Minikreisel ist und habe in JOSM die entsprechende Vorlage genutzt ohne darauf zu achten, ob die eine Richtung hat/angibt. Ich könnte das demnächst prüfen.
--jens
32017-01-24 22:35:39 UTCmueschel Dann lösche ich das mal, da hast du wahrscheinlich aus Versehen etwas ausgewählt. Bei "normalen" Kreiseln ist die Angabe ja überflüssig.
42017-01-24 22:41:51 UTCblauer_elefant danke. ich achte beim nächsten Mal drauf
12017-01-24 22:32:37 UTCmueschel Hallo,
was spricht denn gegen highway=preproposed? Das ist das übliche Tag für eine Straße in diesem Planungsstand.
Gruß, Jan
22017-01-25 05:52:00 UTCGerdP Hallo Jan,

siehe diese CS-Diskussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/7372351#map=11/49.8861/9.7954
12017-01-24 11:29:21 UTCmueschel Hallo,
das Tagging kommt mir falsch vor.
- Die Straße ist immer motor_vehicle=private, außer jetzt sind wegen der Baustelle Lieferfahrzeuge erlaubt.
- Das Tag "temporary = date_on=2017-01-14" gibt es nicht, Zeiten werden mittels der conditional-Syntax angegeben.
- Warum is...
22017-01-26 08:37:42 UTCvillage Hm, ich weiß nicht, ob du die Situation vor Ort gesehen hast: Die Straße ist vorhanden, aber auf diesem Teil komplett gesperrt, der Fußweg auf der rechten Seite gar nicht mehr vorhanden - und dient als Baustellenzufahrt.
Wenn da jetzt wirklich gebaut wird, dauert das bestimmt 1&fr...
12017-01-24 09:58:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found 25 objects with the key "brrier" in your edits, would you mind correcting that?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-24 10:14:57 UTCSK53 Fixed: copying tags from object to object has it's issues :-)
12017-01-24 09:57:53 UTCmueschel Hi,
there are some new "buildlings" added by you:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/lsV
22017-01-24 18:24:20 UTCnjsurf1813 mueschel,

Indeed they have. I'd made a circular building in josm with the 'buildlings' tag and haven't been too careful to make sure that future not-made-with-building-tool buildings are not accidentally tagged the same I suppose.Thanks for looking out. I will fix and make sure I don't make the m...
12017-01-22 18:31:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way?
SUR=GRO looks like a mistake
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467476183

Jan
22017-01-22 19:17:11 UTCLuuuddooo Thanks a lot Jan for noticing this mistake ! I probably thought JOSM would autocomplete to surface=ground but it couldn't work because of CAPS LOCK...
12017-01-21 20:13:24 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this relation?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6894134
I don't understand the key "-- = 7"

Jan
12017-01-21 20:10:55 UTCmueschel Hi,
there is a spelling mistake in the fcc key on this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1785267661
Could you check and correct it?
22017-01-24 19:55:10 UTCmicahcochran I have corrected the misspelled tag. Thanks!
12017-01-21 20:06:14 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added some ref-Tags with varying spelling. Could you use a consistent tag?
ref:eUR27
ref:eur27
ref:eEUR27
REF:EUR27
ref:eUnis
REF:EUNIS
Common practice seems to be ref:EUNIS and ref:EUR27
22017-01-21 21:19:55 UTCfrancoLI First I apologize for my bad English. I'm using google translator.
I thought that tags were not case sensitive.
I will try to correct.
the difference between EUR 27 and EUNIS is how subtle. EUR27 refer basically to the areas of Applied directives Habitat, while EUNIS is more general and sometimes...
12017-01-21 20:02:01 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found many ways with strange tags, like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467016766

Could you have a look and correct these?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-22 05:21:10 UTCdnwilson Thanks for letting me know I have fixed it.
It was caused by cut and past going very wrong.
12017-01-21 19:56:53 UTCmueschel Here is another new way with strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466974600

22017-01-21 20:21:31 UTCpiligab Hi Mueschel.
I proceeded to change the tags. Thanks for your feedback.
Regards.
12017-01-21 18:08:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found tags like
sidewalk hazard
travel hazard
trip hazard
Sidewalkhazards
on several objects.
This might be a good description of something,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look to the wiki about common
tags.

Jan
12017-01-21 13:45:04 UTCmueschel Hi,
I found this way with strange tags. Could you correct this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467242504

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-21 15:48:36 UTCtaborda Hi. Sorry. I have made a mistake. I Will solve it. Thanks.
12017-01-21 13:31:58 UTCmueschel Hi,
wo kommen den diese ganzen Informationen her? Von Bing, wie du angibst, sicher nicht.

Außerdem ist beim Tagging einiges schiefgelaufen.
generator:output:electricity=yes/kWh - da macht der Wert keinen Sinn
generator: location - da gehört kein Leerzeichen rein
Und alle Knoten de...
22017-01-21 14:31:27 UTCDD1GJ Zudem sind die Häuser jetzt doppelt vorhanden. Daher habe ich alles zurückgesetzt
32017-01-26 09:31:20 UTCNakaner @DD1GJ @mueschel siehe meinen Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45504461
12017-01-20 22:45:53 UTCmueschel Bitte fügen nicht blind "junction = roundabout" an Wege an, nur weil Osmose eine Warnung anzeigt. Ein roundabout muss immer mit einem entsprechenden blauen Schild ausgestattet sein, das ist bei Wendeplätzen wie diesem sicher nicht der Fall.
22017-01-20 22:50:43 UTCmueschel Hi,
please don't add "junction = roundabout" to places like this. This tag is only used in case there are the corresponding traffic signs and rules in place.
32017-01-29 18:43:50 UTCvenerdi I apologize for the error. I deduced the rules of precedence from aerial photos and I could not check for traffic signal. Thanks for your correction. In the case of closed lines that are reported as errors by Osmose it would probably be better to divide them into two parts to avoid the problem.
12017-01-20 22:28:51 UTCmueschel Hallo,
dein mapping von einfachen Kreuzungen mit sehr vielen einzelnen Wegen entspricht nicht der gängen Praxis und führt zu vielen Problemen, z.B. an dieser Kreuzung:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45137545#map=19/50.46256/8.37944
Da stimmen in vielen Fällen die jetzt not...
12017-01-20 22:13:30 UTCmueschel Hallo,
bei deinen Edits von Waldwegen sind hier in der Gegend sehr viele "überlappende Wege" entstanden. D.h. zwei Wege, die auf einem ganzen Stück übereinander liegen. Würdest du da nochmal einen Blick drauf werfen?

http://keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12&l...
12017-01-19 11:39:47 UTCmueschel Hi,
this valley has a strange tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465942245
"Val Désél = Senté de la Gesa"
Is this the name?

Jan
22017-01-19 12:22:46 UTCCarlo Folini Sorry, my fault! It should be a 'name' tag.
Thanks for pointing me to this.

Can I ask you how do you discovered it?

Ciao Carlo
32017-01-19 12:51:08 UTCmueschel I wrote a small script that shows all the new keys appearing in the database:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
mueschel has contributed to 500 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 1009 comment(s) (limit: 500 changesets)