| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168468412 by wegavision @ 2025-07-04 04:29 | 1 | 2025-07-05 09:22 | mueschel | Hi,schau doch nochmal auf die destination-Tags. Ich habe hier wieder einige korrigiert:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168514644 |
| 2 | 2025-07-05 13:19 | wegavision ♦64 | Eigentlich überprfe ich nun alle Änderungen mit dem Tool:https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinations/example/#wayid=4320207&direction=0&country=DE | |
| 3 | 2025-07-05 13:43 | mueschel | Dort habe ich leider keinen Validator für die Reihenfolge im Tag eingebaut. Das Tool akzeptiert einige vom üblichen Tagging abweichende Varianten, z.b. hier werden beide Fahrtrichtungen gleich dargestellt, aber nur "backward" ist korrekt:https://osm.janmichel.eu/destinations/... | |
| 168434740 by Erick tamba @ 2025-07-03 09:12 | 1 | 2025-07-04 09:54 | mueschel | Hi,something went very wrong here. All these tiny buildings are drawn with more than 400 node and a strange "Preparation = Phase" tag. Could you check that? |
| 2 | 2025-07-04 21:11 | Erick tamba ♦253 | Sure corrected, the tag it was supposed to be building under construction! | |
| 168330594 by Yog Sot @ 2025-06-30 23:49 | 1 | 2025-07-01 08:59 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/272j.What is the mean of the tagsdata_utwor = 1997-02-17Zfop_id = 103048gid = 133878fop=PL.ZIPOP.1393.PP.3021113.2479? By the way Did you mean source instead of website? |
| 2 | 2025-07-01 11:28 | Yog Sot ♦232 | yeah, it might have been source, not the website. I looked up an existing monument and website looked like a valid choice. as for data_utwor = * It should have been creation date or something of sorts, but yeah, was tired and forgot about itas for `fop_id` and `gid` well, those are some iden... | |
| 3 | 2025-07-01 13:35 | Yog Sot ♦232 | what do you think would be best tag for the date? heritage:date= designation_date=start_date ???I think heritage:date is best, although not documented of course. The tree is older that its official start of protection date | |
| 4 | 2025-07-02 17:56 | mueschel | The start of protection is often tagged as "inscription_date", mostly with a prefix denoting the organization https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/inscription_date#similarThe two id tags can be in OSM, if they give a reference to some other public database. The common scheme for su... | |
| 5 | 2025-07-03 14:16 | Yog Sot ♦232 | okey, thx, I made those changes at /168446495 | |
| 168245405 by arjnaras86! @ 2025-06-28 22:47 | 1 | 2025-06-29 13:45 | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!Please have a look to the tutorials on how to add roads to OSM. The ones you added here I just fixed. |
| 168170334 by wegavision @ 2025-06-27 07:12 | 1 | 2025-06-28 10:50 | mueschel | Hallo,schau bitte nochmal nach deinen destination-Tags.Die übliche Reihenfolge der Subkeys ist eine andere, z.B. destination:lanes:ref:colour -> destination:colour:ref:lanesoderdestination:ref:forward:to -> destination:ref:to:forward |
| 2 | 2025-06-28 12:02 | wegavision ♦64 | Ja ich bin noch am üben. leider gibt es keine wirkliche Anleitung, man muss solange probieren, bis es klappt. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-28 12:04 | wegavision ♦64 | Die neueren, die ich gestern in Bayern gemacht habe, stimen langsam, wobei ich immer noch probleme mit dem colour habe, das will manchmal bei -to nicht. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-28 12:59 | mueschel | Dieses Schema hier sollte fast immer stimmen:destination[:hgv|:bicycle|...][:colour][:ref|:symbol|:street|...][:to][:lanes][:forward|:backward|:both_ways] | |
| 5 | 2025-06-29 10:14 | mueschel | Hier sind die Änderungen:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168258545#map=12/50.0849/12.5348 | |
| 168221973 by mueschel @ 2025-06-28 10:55 | 1 | 2025-06-28 22:58 | queenofthenightosphere ♦2 | I'm not sure about the tag `toilets:wheelchair:grab_rails=yes`. I feel like I prefer `toilets:grab_rails=yes`. The `wheelchair` namespace seems unnecessary, and somewhat inaccurate. Grab rails aren't only for wheelchairs, and it doesn't feel necessary to namespace them under wheelchai... |
| 2 | 2025-06-29 06:51 | mueschel | "wheelchair" is the key that summarizes many different kinds of disabilities, in the same way the wheelchair symbol on parking spaces doesn't restrict it to wheelchair users only. "toilets:wheelchair:grab_rails" is in use since a couple of years. I don't think there... | |
| 161107772 by mueschel @ 2025-01-07 19:09 | 1 | 2025-06-28 05:20 | 無限の刃 ♦10 | You violated "On the Ground Rule"https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_RuleI recommend you quit editing in Japan. Because you can't read Japanese comment. |
| 2 | 2025-06-28 07:08 | mueschel | I'm very well able to understand what was written there, but it doesn't describe the common tagging practice. On a highway, the 'name' tag refers to the name of the highway and 'bridge:name' is the name of the bridge if it is not mapped separately. There's nothing ... | |
| 3 | 2025-07-02 08:43 | 無限の刃 ♦10 | Be aware my edits is in conformity with OSM rule. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_RuleAlmost roads in Japan don't have highway name. It is just operator and reference number. 東海道 is not currently road name but used in places because it is popular.If we follo... | |
| 168107436 by Ivy11 @ 2025-06-25 18:25 | 1 | 2025-06-27 07:59 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain what these two tags mean? They are not in use in other places:monitoring:emergencymonitoring:politial |
| 168029735 by Razr7315 @ 2025-06-24 05:01 | 1 | 2025-06-26 17:51 | mueschel | Hi,the hydrants got a strange tag "storz=false" - could you check that? |
| 166908834 by mueschel @ 2025-05-29 08:44 | 1 | 2025-06-26 12:37 | flohoff ♦2,354 | Moin,ich reverte deine position:forward zu position:distance wieder.distance ist hier nicht eindeutig. Distance wäre die diagonale - das ist hier aber nicht angeschlagen. Und ja - Im wiki steht distance. Das ist aber eben unsinn.Flo |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 13:32 | mueschel | Bitte lass die Tags so wie im Wiki beschrieben. Bitte erst dort diskutieren und einen Konsens finden. | |
| 168039553 by wielandb @ 2025-06-24 09:36 | 1 | 2025-06-26 09:41 | mueschel | Hallo,kannst du statt electric_vehicle:description einfach das traffic_sign angeben? Dann wäre das sauber erfasst und auswertbar. |
| 167933503 by UncleZhanger @ 2025-06-21 23:06 | 1 | 2025-06-23 09:48 | mueschel | Hi,I'm confused about these tags. Why is the axle load so much higher for double and triple axles? That means a truck with triple axle can be six times as heavy as one with a single axle? Or is this the maxweight, in case of a triple axle? |
| 2 | 2025-06-23 10:28 | UncleZhanger ♦2 | It’s the combined load for tandem axle(2 axles close together) and tri-axle(3 axles close together) configuration. Not per single axle but per axle group. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-23 11:31 | mueschel | Thanks! 'maxaxleweight' is per axle. The limit here is a 'maxweight:conditional'. There are already several in the database like maxweight:conditional = 18 @ (bogie:axles = 2); 24 @ (bogie:axles = 3) | |
| 4 | 2025-06-23 18:01 | UncleZhanger ♦2 | Thanks. I’ve updated it. | |
| 167890123 by goodidea @ 2025-06-20 21:05 | 1 | 2025-06-21 14:20 | mueschel | Hallo,die marker=aerial haben hier Tags die es sonst nicht gibt, und die anscheinend nicht nötig sind.colour und material sind die Tags für den von oben sichtbaren Teil.Die Form könnte man in marker:shape packen.support, support:material, support:colour beschreiben den Pfo... |
| 2 | 2025-06-22 16:50 | goodidea ♦95 | Das sehe ich anders.Material sollte das Material des GESAMTEN Objekts beschreiben, das getaggt ist, dann wäre metal;plastic nötig, und man weiß nicht mehr, was plastic, was metal ist. Ich finde es so präziser und eindeutiger. Und werde diese Tags solange benutzen (ANY TAGS Y... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-22 17:01 | mueschel | Die Definition im Wiki ist eindeutig, und auch logisch passt das. marker=aerial ist nur der Teil, der für die Sichtbarkeit sorgt. Der Pfosten ist nicht Teil davon und wird extra beschrieben.Bei einem Briefkasten taggst du ja auch nicht colour=yellow;silver, weil er auf einem Metallpfost... | |
| 4 | 2025-06-22 17:33 | goodidea ♦95 | Noch eine Anmerkung wegen shape und warum ich mich dagegen entschieden habe: keiner der shape Werte würden für ein Dach passen. triangular_prism vielleicht am ehesten, jedoch ist es eben KEIN geschlossener 3D-Körper, wie z.B. ein boundary_stone mit einer solchen Form.triangle w&uu... | |
| 5 | 2025-06-22 17:42 | goodidea ♦95 | Das Konzept bleibt schlecht und unausgereift, ich habe ja nun genügend detailliert erklärt, wozu es führt.Briefkasten mit support=post ist eben gerade KEIN passender Vergleich.Zeigt mir, dass du an einer ernsthaften Diskussion nicht interessiert bist.In einen Briefkasten-P... | |
| 6 | 2025-06-22 18:04 | mueschel | Wenn du eine Diskussion möchtest, führe sie bitte im Forum. Changeset Kommentare sind dafür wahrlich nicht geeignet. | |
| 7 | 2025-06-28 03:28 | goodidea ♦95 | Ich habe im Moment keine Energie für solche Forumsdiskussionen, tut mir leid.Ich kann höchstens Fotos beisteuern der Fälle, die das Unausgegorene bei marker=aerial vs. marjer=post zeigen (insbesondere dann bei Detailtags wie colour + material), und die bei mir in der Region die Re... | |
| 167893360 by John Grubb @ 2025-06-20 23:01 | 1 | 2025-06-22 14:19 | mueschel | Hi,you added three new keys for seemingly the same thing, the planned phases of construction. Could you decide on one?development:phasedevelopment_phaseref:development |
| 2 | 2025-06-22 14:45 | John Grubb ♦40 | It'll be development:phase. I'm in the process of updating "my" developments but there's so many it's taking a bit of time. | |
| 167860146 by Andrew BeZon @ 2025-06-20 09:17 | 1 | 2025-06-22 13:00 | mueschel | Hi,"traffic_signals:direction:right=arrow" is not yet used anywhere. What does it mean? |
| 2 | 2025-06-22 13:05 | Andrew BeZon ♦1 | Hi, it’s mean traffi_signals use different direction (main section and right section). I used GPT chat hints. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-22 13:25 | mueschel | It seems ChatGPT told you something wrong. "traffic_signal:direction" is just about the direction of travel along the road, not about turning. Do you have a photo of these traffic lights, then I might be able to help. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-22 13:30 | Andrew BeZon ♦1 | It’s look like https://www.radioleverkusen.de/externalimages/?source=jpg157/gettyimages-923229454.jpg&crop=699x0x2767x2767&resize=1200x1200&dt=201910041459140 | |
| 5 | 2025-06-22 14:00 | mueschel | It looks like there is no need for an additional tag here. At the point of the traffic_signals node you can't turn right anyhow - the ways already split 20 meters further west.The particular design with one common light for all lanes is just a design choice of the street planner - and we curr... | |
| 167822851 by M GM @ 2025-06-19 11:56 | 1 | 2025-06-19 13:21 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain this change?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10672746368You removed the 'ele' and 'natural' tag and added a strange "moutain_pass" tag. |
| 2 | 2025-06-19 15:49 | M GM ♦5 | Hello, I did this because it is not a properly a col but rather a "pas" (local name for a small climbing section of a path) which is usually tagged as moutain_pass in the Calanques. Therefore the elevation tag is no longer relevant (it's in the middle of a slope, not at a summit) | |
| 3 | 2025-06-19 16:04 | mueschel | Hi,thanks for the reply!- The 'ele' tag can be added to any point, not just peaks.- 'moutain_pass' is misspelled.- '(Pas)' is for sure not a proper name and should not be in the name tag. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-19 16:33 | M GM ♦5 | The ele is never present elsewhere on a "pas" in the Calanques, its suppression is a matter off coherenceI have just corrected the misspellingThe usage of (Pas) is common in the Calanques, to indicate its presence on a map even if it does not necessarily have a name | |
| 5 | 2025-06-19 17:22 | mueschel | Please don't delete tags like 'ele', just because they are not commonly used. They still serve their purpose. Please also have a look at the description of the 'name' key - such generic descriptions are not to be tagged. | |
| 6 | 2025-06-19 19:32 | M GM ♦5 | Okay, I'll correct | |
| 167785530 by rbal @ 2025-06-18 14:37 | 1 | 2025-06-19 08:45 | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong here. All of this data are duplicates of existing features.This happens if you load a geojson or similar file into JOSM and then try to upload it. You have to load data directly from the API or Overpass - every other way will lead to duplicates and not to editing the alre... |
| 167575923 by aspoon @ 2025-06-13 13:31 | 1 | 2025-06-14 09:35 | mueschel | Welcome to OSM!Please don't just dump any data from external sources into the OSM database. It is necessary that any import of data follows our import guidelines:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 167408951 by Niels Elgaard Larsen @ 2025-06-09 16:49 | 1 | 2025-06-12 18:46 | mueschel | Hi,"ad_libitum" is not a common tag. Do you mean "all_you_can_eat"? |
| 2 | 2025-06-13 17:40 | Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦596 | Yes, but all_you_can_eat is a cancelled proposal. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-13 19:10 | mueschel | The proposal was made and left inactive. There was no discussion or rejection. The tag is in use for a decade now - although the number of uses is still low. | |
| 167396678 by Taksine @ 2025-06-09 12:56 | 1 | 2025-06-11 10:16 | mueschel | Hi,there are some ways with a strange tag here, could you check that?https://www.openstreetmap.org/E.g. way/1391745075 |
| 167352125 by mueschel @ 2025-06-08 13:34 | 1 | 2025-06-09 10:53 | Marych_ ♦189 | Dear mueschel,What for you did this change?Main language in Uzbekistan is Uzbek Latin-based alphabetName in name filed is correctfor what reason you add uz-Latn ?Where you got Shoxjaxon mahallasi - for example? |
| 2 | 2025-06-10 07:48 | mueschel | Hi,I didn't add these names, they are there since 3 years. I just fixed the mistake in the keys with a ':' at the end. | |
| 167159363 by DENelson83 @ 2025-06-04 04:30 | 1 | 2025-06-04 09:46 | mueschel | Hi,it's not necessary to add almost 30 "frequency:78" tags to a single object. You can just combine them in a single tag, separated with a semicolon. |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 18:34 | DENelson83 ♦95 | I separated them to make each individual frequency easier to parse. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-04 19:15 | mueschel | What is easier or faster depends a lot on the specific use case. Separate tags makes parsing the value slightly quicker (you save just a simple split operation of a string), but on the other hand it makes finding the tags a lot more expensive: Your database request doesn't ask for a simple ke... | |
| 167119887 by thetornado76 @ 2025-06-03 06:58 | 1 | 2025-06-04 18:31 | mueschel | Hi,please check these edits. The common tag is "motorcycle:sales", not "motorcycle:sale". |
| 2 | 2025-06-05 06:27 | thetornado76 ♦162 | Thanks for the tip. I'll correct it. | |
| 167144291 by tvbrene @ 2025-06-03 17:03 | 1 | 2025-06-04 09:52 | mueschel | Hallo,ich habe hier ein paar maxspeed tags korrigiert. Die richtige Reihenfolge im Key ist "maxspeed:hgv:forward". Erst das Fahrzeug, dann die Richtung. |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 11:56 | tvbrene ♦21 | Okay, danke. | |
| 167102776 by sef43 @ 2025-06-02 17:40 | 1 | 2025-06-03 13:34 | mueschel | Hi,here are some payment tags on a highway, but there is no tag about a toll or similar. Could you check that?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565349328 |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 12:11 | sef43 ♦6 | I have updated this way (cl:167176356), I had thought access:*=permit would provide enough information as there is just a sign, no booth or obstacle of any kind. | |
| 167056179 by duduewgdu @ 2025-06-01 15:38 | 1 | 2025-06-02 18:04 | mueschel | Hi,in total 18 of the tags you added are not used in any other place - that makes it unlikely that any tool will understand them. I'd suggest to check some other similar airports to see how they are tagged.Especially suffixes like "primary" or "ft" are not generally us... |
| 167084973 by mueschel @ 2025-06-02 10:17 | 1 | 2025-06-02 10:38 | Tatfahren ♦271 | Hallo mueschel,Der Nutzer hat noch viele weitere Koordinaten ergänzt, dort aber das letzte "s" in "GPs" groß geschrieben.Wenn Koordinaten in diesem tag falsch sind, sollten die wohl alle entfernt werden, und wenn nicht, an dieser Stelle nur der Schreibfehler korr... |
| 2 | 2025-06-02 10:57 | mueschel | Hi,danke für den Hinweis. Diesen Key hatte ich nicht gesehen, weil er schon seit einem Import 2012 existiert (mit yes/no).Koordinaten von Objekten in Tags sind unnötig, da sich der Knoten ja bereits an der richtigen Stelle befindet. Nur wenn Koordinaten explizit auf dem Objekt vermer... | |
| 167023295 by Kvedulv @ 2025-05-31 17:54 | 1 | 2025-06-02 10:24 | mueschel | Could you check this way, it got a strange 'ogau' tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243761489#map=18/49.543112/25.611674 |
| 2 | 2025-06-02 11:03 | Kvedulv ♦3 | Sorry, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167086791 | |
| 167026438 by Robin van der Linde @ 2025-05-31 19:33 | 1 | 2025-06-02 10:20 | mueschel | Hi,"routePoint" is not used in other places. Is this number a kind of gtfs reference or similar? |
| 2 | 2025-06-02 10:32 | Robin van der Linde ♦11 | Hi,That should've been "ref:IFOPT". I used an export of NeTEx data and did the first few stops manually before creating a script to convert to OSM tags. | |
| 134662246 by mueschel @ 2023-04-08 17:38 | 1 | 2025-05-31 15:01 | Johnwhelan ♦84 | deleting the tag and adding fixmedoesn |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 15:02 | Johnwhelan ♦84 | add that much value.John | |
| 3 | 2025-05-31 15:04 | mueschel | There are very few tools that mark random tags as error / warning, but many tools that highlight 'fixme'. The edit made the problem much more visible to most mappers. | |
| 4 | 2025-05-31 15:45 | Johnwhelan ♦84 | I think JOM validation highlights them and changing it to heathcare centre wouldn't have taken that much extra effort unless you're using an automated tool. | |
| 5 | 2025-05-31 15:56 | mueschel | JOSM doesn't highlight unknown tags - unless they contain other errors like spaces like in this case. I can't simply change them without knowing what a "centre de sante" is in the local context. | |
| 6 | 2025-05-31 16:11 | Johnwhelan ♦84 | Apols, I accept "centre de sante" isn't english so might be difficult for you to understand.Cheerio John | |
| 166993997 by Poliana Rezende Costa @ 2025-05-31 00:19 | 1 | 2025-05-31 10:28 | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong here. Most of this data are duplicates of existing features.This happens if you load a geojson or similar file into JOSM and then try to upload it. You have to load data directly from the API or Overpass - every other way will lead to duplicates and not to editing the alr... |
| 166874674 by Alexandre Bolduc @ 2025-05-28 12:46 | 1 | 2025-05-30 10:31 | mueschel | Hi,what exactly are these survey_points?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12870964132A monitoring station for cell phone signal strength? |
| 166834948 by DetectiveConan @ 2025-05-27 16:30 | 1 | 2025-05-29 10:24 | mueschel | Hi,would you please point us to the discussion and documentation of this massive world-wide retagging of food amenities?New tags are not introduced by creating a Wiki page and immediately retagging objects all across the world. A new top-level tag for one special kind of food is a weird choi... |
| 166733224 by opnsmcb @ 2025-05-25 12:47 | 1 | 2025-05-26 16:52 | mueschel | Hi,die Mühe, alle Tags mit einem "abandoned:" zu versehen brauchst du dir nicht machen. abandoned:amenity=telephone\tund vielleicht noch ein paar Tags welche das Aussehen beschreiben sind völlig ausreichend - alles andere kann weg, da es ja eindeutig keine Chance mehr gib... |
| 166741539 by Viima @ 2025-05-25 16:00 | 1 | 2025-05-26 09:56 | mueschel | Hi,'recycling:energy_waste' is not in use in other places - what does it mean? |
| 2 | 2025-05-26 14:00 | Viima ♦17 | Hello.I am not an expert on recycling, but "energiajäte" or energy waste is going to be burned for energy. Therefore anything that burns is suitable for energy waste. For example plastic, wood and cardboard can be put there if there is not a separate container for them. I consider... | |
| 165073475 by uak @ 2025-04-17 13:58 | 1 | 2025-05-25 15:08 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this relation, it got a strange tag:charge:condition = 1.50 GELhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5542871 |
| 166716367 by afuchs @ 2025-05-24 23:58 | 1 | 2025-05-25 09:45 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this kerb? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11109129468It has several tags that are not used in other kerbs: counter = slope: <= 5% description = Incline: 11% top = landing: >=60" two_sided = yes |
| 2 | 2025-05-25 21:07 | afuchs ♦1 | I've updated the tags on this specific kerb node to better align with OSM standards.There's several ways near this node in the Buffalo Medical Campus which which have nonstandard but very detailed tags.Given how detailed these nonstandard tags are I've been avoiding edits to t... | |
| 166675465 by Lauren Kovacs @ 2025-05-23 21:53 | 1 | 2025-05-25 09:03 | mueschel | Welcome to OSM!These edits look like you dumped a local data set into the OSM database. Unfortunately this is not the correct way to import external data and make it usable within OSM.Please have a look at our import guidelines:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GuidelinesI'... |
| 2 | 2025-05-25 16:23 | Lauren Kovacs ♦1 | Thank you so much. I tried to read as much as I could but clearly missed this important info. Did you delete the additional points (all points) I've uploaded so far? If not, please do. Thanks again. | |
| 166627649 by xrt @ 2025-05-22 19:37 | 1 | 2025-05-24 16:33 | mueschel | Please don't try to start discussions in 'description' tags. I removed "maxweight:7.5" because such a tag doesn't exist. There can't be a value inside the key. The correct form for conditionally different weight restrictions is maxweight:conditional = * @ * |
| 166569163 by salgo60 @ 2025-05-21 13:20 | 1 | 2025-05-22 09:26 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this node, it got two ref tags, which one is correct?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12850724601#map=19/59.339660/18.037133 |
| 2 | 2025-05-22 09:34 | salgo60 ♦12 | Thanks fixed | |
| 166360715 by Viima @ 2025-05-16 17:00 | 1 | 2025-05-18 10:48 | mueschel | Hi,I don't fully understand the tagging of this way:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207542763What's the difference in both directions (apart from the traffic signs)? In one direction you tag it as segregated, in the other as pedestrians need to use the shoulder, but the surface ... |
| 2 | 2025-05-20 18:15 | Viima ♦17 | Hello and thank you for commenting.If I recall correctly, to the north of the way there is a traffic sign FI:D7 that indicates that this is a segragated cyclepath and a footpath. If approached from the southern end it seems like a regular roadway with a shoulder.This is because cyclists and ... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-21 18:40 | mueschel | Thanks for the explanation. It seems the city map can't be accessed from Germany...The current tagging is a bit unfortunate, because e.g. 'shoulder' is not used with forward/backward, but always with left/right. But maybe the city comes up with better signage quicker than we can f... | |
| 166432480 by Samiknoov @ 2025-05-18 13:58 | 1 | 2025-05-20 10:21 | mueschel | Hi,'mobile_bakery' is not yet in use in other places.Have a look for "street_vendor", which also covers this type of amenity traveling around:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:street_vendor%3Dyes |
| 166410959 by ORBIS GEOTECNOLOGIAS @ 2025-05-17 22:44 Active block | 1 | 2025-05-18 10:32 | mueschel | Welcome to OSM!Something went wrong here: Instead of editing existing objects, you uploaded a whole new set, duplicating the existing data.Please only use the integrated download function of JOSM. Don't try to download e.g. a GeoJSON file elsewhere and open it in JOSM - it will result in ... |
| 166144141 by NTTrailsLSE @ 2025-05-12 10:16 | 1 | 2025-05-15 10:55 | mueschel | Hi,please check this node, it got a strange tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12830021694#map=19/51.267525/-0.282896 |
| 166202469 by IvicaBanovac @ 2025-05-13 13:14 | 1 | 2025-05-14 11:09 | mueschel | Hi,please check your tagging:It's "axle", not "axel". and the full tag should be"maxaxles:hgv" |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 11:57 | MarkoŠatrak ♦30 | Hi @mueschel,I’m writing as the project lead for our organised editing activity: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/OptimoRoute.Thank you for reporting this problem. We do have an internal review process in which every changeset is checked by another team ... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-14 12:01 | mueschel | Thanks for the reply. I already fixed the tags that where added up to now. Just make sure your presets / auto-completion get updated. | |
| 166090095 by Lieckio @ 2025-05-11 00:27 | 1 | 2025-05-11 16:47 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this parking? "maxstay" should be a time, not a price.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383240422 |
| 2 | 2025-05-11 17:24 | Lieckio ♦4 | Hey, thank you! Must have been an error in the script, that is odd tagging indeed. Will change! | |
| 166059944 by toponymia @ 2025-05-10 09:09 | 1 | 2025-05-11 08:48 | mueschel | Hi,you added two memorials with a huge amount of text in the tags. Is all this text in the various languages actually present on the memorial? If not, it shouldn't be in OSM - a link to Wikipedia or Wikidata containing all the details about the person is sufficient. |
| 165898199 by Mercy14846 @ 2025-05-06 15:32 | 1 | 2025-05-07 09:08 | mueschel | Hi,these ferries got a huge amount of tags that are not used in other places and are very unlikely to be used in any kind of software.I'm convinced that there are enough standard tagging options for this kind of information.Most importantly, the prefixes 'public_boat' and '... |
| 2 | 2025-05-08 14:44 | Mercy14846 ♦3 | Hello,I will look into this but in Nigeria, we have a ferry route that take’s both public and private boats in the same coordinate. We want this information to be in our data without having to create duplicate coordinates. We will do further research to see how this can be better structure... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-08 14:56 | mueschel | You can just draw one way and create two relations using this way. This separates the two types of ferry without drawing anything twice. | |
| 4 | 2025-05-08 15:04 | Mercy14846 ♦3 | Okay.Do you have any tutorial or blogs I can use? | |
| 5 | 2025-05-08 15:12 | Mercy14846 ♦3 | Does it make sense to use type: | |
| 6 | 2025-05-08 17:54 | mueschel | It's described in the wiki page about ferry routes:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=ferryAre you familiar with bus routes? The mapping scheme is almost identical. | |
| 165813734 by kamasytrix @ 2025-05-04 18:27 | 1 | 2025-05-08 10:38 | mueschel | Hi,please check the wiki for common socket:* tags - the ones you used here are not used in any other place. |
| 165740293 by John Grubb @ 2025-05-02 23:43 | 1 | 2025-05-07 10:11 | mueschel | Hi,you used tags like "level:1-2=residential" to mark the use of different parts of two buildings. Usually, this is mapped using two building:part=yes objects with their respective building:use tags. Could you have a look at this tagging scheme? |
| 165640567 by atticquilt @ 2025-04-30 15:39 | 1 | 2025-05-04 10:35 | mueschel | Hi,you introduced a new tag here: "bikestreets" - what does it mean? |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 13:26 | atticquilt ♦2 | This was an error. Good catch. I've resolved it now. | |
| 165606862 by Colin Smale @ 2025-04-29 19:29 | 1 | 2025-05-03 14:12 | mueschel | Hi,you introduced a new tag "mayoral" here - what does it mean? |
| 2 | 2025-05-03 14:27 | Colin Smale ♦319 | That the authority has an elected Mayor. Not all Combined Authorities do. | |
| 165535194 by tykayn @ 2025-04-28 07:32 | 1 | 2025-05-03 09:15 | mueschel | Hi,you added the new tag "station_deux_roues" here - what does it mean?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12794145071And: Are you sure the output of this station is just 22 kW? That's not really enough to charge 6 cars in parallel. And: the station is taggd to have no socket... |
| 2 | 2025-05-03 09:22 | tykayn ♦20 | hi,yes station_deux_roues is a mistake.the output of charging_station:output is documented in the wiki as the maximum power delivered you can have in the most capable socket, it is not the installed power output. people are often confused about this, we should find an other tag to describe t... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-03 09:33 | mueschel | Where did you find this definition of the output?The Wiki clearly says"charging_station:output=<xxx> kW – Use this to specify the maximum output of the entire station: This value can often be found on the back of the charge points. For a station with multiple charge points, add ... | |
| 4 | 2025-05-03 14:05 | tykayn ♦20 | that is quite a topic that deserves some discussion with the community. i opened a topic on the french forum here since it is located in Francehttps://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/faut-il-mapper-les-sockets-absents-sur-les-bornes-de-recharge/33697i did not add the cee_red_63a data because i have... | |
| 165441175 by mueschel @ 2025-04-25 20:21 | 1 | 2025-04-29 02:21 | afgb1977 ♦22 | Hello. What is your data source for Tienda el Mono (N12785004891)?I know that business location and at least 50% of the key=value is incorrect. |
| 2 | 2025-04-29 07:46 | mueschel | Hi, I didn't add any data, this was done in another changeset. | |
| 165394301 by Larmax @ 2025-04-24 18:53 | 1 | 2025-04-27 10:00 | mueschel | Hi,please check this street, something went wrong with the parking tags "par" and ":taxi".https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143057430 |
| 2 | 2025-04-27 16:16 | Larmax ♦267 | Hi, thanks for the heads up, should be fixed now | |
| 165338100 by sheldonelectric @ 2025-04-23 14:53 | 1 | 2025-04-27 09:32 | mueschel | Hi,you used some maxstay and charge tags here that don't seem correct.E.g.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7673202253Checking the pricing scheme of the operator, there is no maxstay, but just a fee if you stay longer than a certain time.Also, the price doesn't seem to be righ... |
| 2 | 2025-05-02 18:22 | sheldonelectric ♦178 | Hello, thank you for your message. I put the charge and maxstay in this format, knowing it's not (yet) approved, not even discussed, unfortunately I'm on the road atm and don't have time for forums.It was an emergency changeset because HEP's charging stations were previously... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-02 18:35 | sheldonelectric ♦178 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxstayI understand maxstay is how long we're allowed to stay before getting a fine. On charging stations, they implementing this by charging your credit card. Once I paid 70€ because I did not disconnect in the 30 mins allowed.Tagging the pric... | |
| 165358913 by blckdrgn @ 2025-04-24 04:02 | 1 | 2025-04-26 12:11 | mueschel | Hi,the tags access = per_ipovedenti segnaletica_accessibile = Sìare not commonly used. Could you explain which infrastructure is existing here that helps the blind? |
| 165246203 by Eduardo TECNEIRA @ 2025-04-21 15:30 | 1 | 2025-04-22 18:07 | mueschel | Hi,please don't try to dump data from an external source into OSM.All these tags should not appear in OSM:block=-1color24=-1colour=0,0,0,7etype=18handle=896linewidth=0ltscale=1lweight=-1name=TRACKERocolor=256olinetype=continuousspace=0thickness=0transparen=0vis... |
| 165286774 by hy1204 @ 2025-04-22 13:41 | 1 | 2025-04-22 14:12 | mueschel | Hi,please check the wiki about how to map charging stations.None of these tags is correct:charge-capacitycharging_capacitycharge_capacitynum_stationsnum-stationnum-stationsnum_sationshttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=charging_station#Examples |
| 165209623 by Carlos Brys @ 2025-04-20 19:27 | 1 | 2025-04-21 10:19 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/685842571.aaccess = noaccess = permissiveWhat is the correct access value? |
| 2 | 2025-04-21 13:13 | Carlos Brys ♦272 | What do you think is the correct label ?It is a road that goes to an aboriginal community and access without permission is not allowed.https://drive.google.com/file/d/14OR8oytLA2Wf1CR3E8u1OOjDMHj8-2Xb/view?usp=sharing | |
| 3 | 2025-04-21 13:30 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | The correction made by mueschel without asking is correct, I would add a noexit=yes according to the meaning of the sign. | |
| 4 | 2025-04-21 13:34 | mueschel | That's not access=permissive - that means that someone tolerates people accessing the way without asking, but has can revoke this right at any time.access=private would be appropriate - someone decides on a case-by-case basis who is allowed to enter. | |
| 5 | 2025-04-21 13:51 | Carlos Brys ♦272 | I updated the label to access=private | |
| 165098595 by hermann106 @ 2025-04-18 07:34 | 1 | 2025-04-20 09:56 | mueschel | Hi,please check this way, it didn't get any proper tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1378582103 |
| 2 | 2025-04-20 10:34 | hermann106 ♦3 | thanks, i correct it. Thanks a lot | |
| 165063124 by mueschel @ 2025-04-17 09:51 | 1 | 2025-04-17 10:24 | somehundred ♦100 | That's not private data. It's public toilet and code is written on the door and in the receipt if a person buys something. |
| 2 | 2025-04-17 10:29 | mueschel | The pure existence of such a code implies that the door is not meant to be used by everyone. If they distribute the code to all their customers, that is their decision, but making the information public to everyone in the world is likely not their intention. | |
| 3 | 2025-04-17 10:40 | somehundred ♦100 | This information would not benefit anyone in the world except their customers and visitors. It's just a toilet that needs a code to open the door. | |
| 4 | 2025-04-17 10:45 | mueschel | See e.g. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/opinions-on-internet-access-password/117581 | |
| 164729610 by Micheal Kal @ 2025-04-09 15:11 | 1 | 2025-04-14 10:21 | mueschel | Hi,it seems something went wrong with this import of libraries.First of all, we're missing the mandatory source and description of the import, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GuidelinesSecond, there are many tags that are not used in any other place and should be replac... |
| 2 | 2025-04-14 10:52 | Micheal Kal ♦8 | Hey, Thank you for reaching out!The issue here should be maybe about the tags but with the source, I am the source. I did this data collection for Libraries last year so I don't need any permissions to upload it here. | |
| 3 | 2025-04-16 11:17 | wombatmaper ♦62 | Thanks for your work, I have fixed the internet_access tag from "true" to "yes" | |
| 4 | 2025-04-16 11:22 | mueschel | What about all the other non-standard tags?floorsmaterialsresourcessectionsservicesThere are also libraries in the middle of a lake or on top of an uninhabited mountain.No matter what the source of this data is, the large scale of the edit makes it an import that needs to be prop... | |
| 5 | 2025-04-16 11:26 | mueschel | I checked 5 more nodes - non of them is even remotely close to the place the addr:* tags claim it to be. Not even in the same district. This import definitely has to be reverted. | |
| 6 | 2025-04-16 11:50 | Micheal Kal ♦8 | Hey @Mueschel, I don't know the basis for your biased comments.But here is the thing I mapped these libraries with a team through a project title "Ugandan Libraries Geo Quest" under Wikimedia community User group Uganda GLAM project to create an interactive webmap which I created, a... | |
| 7 | 2025-04-16 11:54 | mueschel | Just take this example:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12741716368The next town is ten kilometers away and Bundibugyo district is even further away. | |
| 8 | 2025-04-17 10:09 | Micheal Kal ♦8 | Let me work on fixing the locations so some that are misaligned | |
| 9 | 2025-04-17 10:31 | Micheal Kal ♦8 | apologies on my earlier comments, I realized that I worked on the points in a different CRS hence the misalignment so am fixing that. | |
| 10 | 2025-04-17 19:30 | Micheal Kal ♦8 | All fixed now! | |
| 11 | 2025-04-17 19:33 | Micheal Kal ♦8 | I have fixed only location not tags for now | |
| 164873235 by DeFra85 @ 2025-04-12 21:28 | 1 | 2025-04-16 10:13 | mueschel | Hi,you used this tag on two stone:"inscription:direction_east"I think this should either beinscription:E or direction_east, but not a combination of both. It's highly unlikely that any tool will be able to interpret this tag. |
| 2 | 2025-04-20 11:18 | DeFra85 ♦232 | Oh okay, thanks for the tip. I will correct | |
| 164986219 by 🔺uaibit @ 2025-04-15 13:47 | 1 | 2025-04-15 17:23 | mueschel | Hi,you added some strange tags like "OBTC = UAIBIT". Could you explain what they are supposed to mean? |
| 163979718 by mueschel @ 2025-03-23 10:26 | 1 | 2025-04-15 09:06 | alesarrett ♦130 | I'd suggest to use obstacle:bicycle instead of danger:bicycle, given that the obstacle key is more formalized: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3AobstacleWhat do you think? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163979718 ... |
| 2 | 2025-04-15 09:14 | mueschel | Fine with me - but the 'danger' key was added somewhere else:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163883089 | |
| 3 | 2025-04-15 10:03 | alesarrett ♦130 | Thanks, I'll discuss it with voschix. | |
| 164671831 by BREYSSE JM @ 2025-04-08 10:14 | 1 | 2025-04-13 08:41 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this building? It got a strange 'shutter' tag.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85994237#map=19/43.786039/5.762005 |
| 164763262 by Mazda05 @ 2025-04-10 11:12 | 1 | 2025-04-13 08:06 | mueschel | Hi,the language code 'uum' doesn't seem to exist. Could you check that? |
| 2 | 2025-04-13 15:51 | Mazda05 ♦534 | https://iso639-3.sil.org/code_tables/639/data/u | |
| 164723207 by Kovoschiz @ 2025-04-09 12:48 | 1 | 2025-04-12 17:15 | mueschel | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1371007612May I suggest to tag this way with :lanes? Neither bicycle:both nor bicycle:centre are currently in use. |
| 2 | 2025-04-12 19:53 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | It's `segregated=no` . There's no `lanes=` for it, nor any visible physical characteristics that would divide it into `*:lanes=` on the left half. | |
| 3 | 2025-04-12 20:16 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | Tried to divide it into `footway:*=` and `cycleway:*=` , but it doesn't work quite nice. `cycleway*:bicycle:*=` is still needed. | |
| 4 | 2025-04-13 07:51 | mueschel | If there's nothing on ground, I don't understand what the tags mean. | |
| 5 | 2025-04-13 18:05 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | Yes, there's something, but not lanes. The left half is shared-use, where bikes need to keep right (center), and pedestrians keep left. There's only a pair of small pictograms towards the sides as a reminder, which doesn't take up the entire "lane". No different surfacing. ... | |
| 160057592 by mueschel @ 2024-12-08 13:49 | 1 | 2025-04-12 02:02 | scruss ♦74 | Hey, there's some complete fiction going on here:1) the Uxbridge line is still mostly single track, especially near kennedy station. I live about 200 m from this, I'd know if there was a new line2) there are no public electrification plans. If they manage to electrify this line in ... |
| 2 | 2025-04-12 05:50 | mueschel | Hi,that wasn't my edit. The tags were added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160007751 | |
| 164573513 by Netzwolf @ 2025-04-06 03:16 | 1 | 2025-04-08 07:02 | mueschel | Hi,could you check your 'direction:*' tags? These are not in use up to now.The typical spelling is'direction_northeast' with an underscore and the full name of one of the 8 cardinal directions. |
| 2 | 2025-04-08 16:20 | Netzwolf ♦12 | Ich halte die Darstellung der Parameter von parametrisierten Schlüsseln durch Anhängen mit dem Unterstrich für groben Unfug; der Unterstrich sollte *ausschließlich* als Ersatz für das unerwünschte Leerzeichen genutzt werden.Korrekt wäre eine Darstellung der Pa... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-08 16:48 | mueschel | Well, even if the underscore is not the formally correct symbol, the direction_* scheme is by now very well established, with way more than 100,000 uses. Introducing your own tagging scheme now (actually a fifth way for destination signs!) won't have any good chance to be adopted at any larger ... | |
| 4 | 2025-04-08 19:26 | Netzwolf ♦12 | 仕方が無い。 | |
| 164599629 by Netzwolf @ 2025-04-06 16:30 | 1 | 2025-04-08 07:04 | mueschel | Hi,this highway got a 'direction' tag which most likely should be on a guidepost node:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1375345149 |
| 164538770 by mueschel @ 2025-04-05 07:33 | 1 | 2025-04-06 18:42 | kevinp2 ♦19 | Hi, please don’t delete the url:cadastre tag if you don’t understand what it is going to be used for. A new municipality is being created here and this tag will help link properties to their official records.Thanks! |
| 2 | 2025-04-06 18:42 | kevinp2 ♦19 | Hi, please don’t delete the url:cadastre tag if you don’t understand what it is going to be used for. A new municipality is being created here and this tag will help link properties to their official records.Thanks! | |
| 3 | 2025-04-06 19:16 | mueschel | This link to official sources is already contained in the ref:cadastre tag. The actual url doesn't need to be tagged - it can be generated automatically. And as urls like these tend to change often having only the reference number in the database is very much preferable. | |
| 164240249 by lpf452 @ 2025-03-29 09:11 | 1 | 2025-04-04 18:01 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of these tags? amenity = clinic emergency = yes emergency:medical = noWhat kind of emergency is handled at this clinic, if it is not medical? |
| 2 | 2025-04-05 12:46 | lpf452 ♦1 | *I'm not sure if I can use markdown here, but using markdown makes it better to insert citation links, so I'll use markdown for the following*Thank you for your thorough review. I'd like to provide some additional context regarding the emergency service capabilities of this diseas... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-05 13:21 | mueschel | Thanks for the long description!I'd like to suggest the following additional tags to mark it as a special thing during emergencies and to explicitly exclude normal emergencies:emergency=noemergency:amenity = clinicemergency:hazard_type = epidemicsThe keys are all already in use, a... | |
| 4 | 2025-04-06 07:55 | lpf452 ♦1 | Your suggestion looks good. I will fix this later using the Java OpenStreetMap editor on Arch Linux.Thank you very much for your suggestion! I'll send you the changeset ID when I'm done editing. | |
| 5 | 2025-04-06 17:55 | lpf452 ♦1 | Fixed: Changeset #164603080 (used Vespucci because included other edits) | |
| 164385832 by MapSpot @ 2025-04-01 17:24 | 1 | 2025-04-02 19:05 | mueschel | Hi,what's the meaning of the opening hours tags here? can't you park outside of these, or is anybody allowed to park then? |
| 2 | 2025-04-04 00:02 | MapSpot ♦96 | Hello,The "opening_hours:charging" tag is meant to convey that the parking space is open exclusively for charging during 10:00-22:00.This was meant to replace the previous tag \t"parking_space=charging@(mo-su_10:00-22:00)" as part of a cleanup of invalid values for the park... | |
| 164056335 by Xavizard Knight @ 2025-03-25 00:55 | 1 | 2025-03-25 09:45 | aTarom ♦769 | Hola, gràcies per editar, el tagring_road=yesahttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18795618/historyes necessari tenintroad=ring_road?Salutacions |
| 2 | 2025-03-25 12:31 | Xavizard Knight ♦12 | Bones! Les etiquetes road=ring_road i ring_road=yes les he posat per marcar que aquesta relació és una ronda que encercla la ciutat.He estat cercant per taginfo i per altres relacions de rondes d'OSM i no he trobat cap etiqueta que específicament marqui que certa relaci... | |
| 3 | 2025-03-25 14:48 | aTarom ♦769 | No es tracta de la que més m'agradi, simplement prefereixo detectar els tags nous a Espanya abans que siguin detectats per altres que els "arreglen" sense preguntar abans a qui els va posar, sabent que no és un error així es queda, gràcies per l'explic... | |
| 4 | 2025-03-26 10:18 | mueschel | Hi Xavier,please let me repeat my request: This new scheme for destination signs adds huge amounts of undocumented tags (115 new keys just today!) that are of no use to any other data consumer. We absolutely need a proper documentation and discussion before these get into such widespread use. | |
| 5 | 2025-03-27 01:23 | Xavizard Knight ♦12 | Heyas again!I don't get what is your objective in chasing every commit that I do and recriminating every new tag that I add.Are you a traffic sign hater that doesn't want any traffic signs in OSM whatsoever? Are you a traffic sign enthusiast that wants to learn what every new sign... | |
| 6 | 2025-03-27 10:51 | mueschel | " at the forum thread that we only talk yopaseopor and myself. That's because we are the only two users in the Catalan community"That's part of the problem. Traffic signs are not a local thing, but globally (or at least Europe-wide) very similar. A tagging scheme can't ... | |
| 7 | 2025-03-27 15:56 | Xavizard Knight ♦12 | Would it be nice to have an international whole-world standard for traffic sign tagging? Yes! It would be very nice indeed!Unfortunately, such an international standard is very unlikely to ever happen.yopaseopor has tried many international traffic sign proposals, which got rejected or never c... | |
| 8 | 2025-03-27 16:34 | mueschel | The "Finland Scheme" is long outdated. The wiki page you cite has been written 12 years ago, without updates since.The discussion about traffic_sign:id was very broad. The situation for destination signs is a lot simpler. Any new scheme can be extended throughout the whole of Europe wi... | |
| 9 | 2025-03-29 11:13 | mueschel | The gas station also got several fuel tags that are not used in other places. These are branded names, that should be translated to generic names like fuel:diesel_b7 or fuel:biodieselhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1314245762 | |
| 10 | 2025-03-30 03:02 | Xavizard Knight ♦12 | Heyas!Yep, you are right that these tags are unique and not great.For adding fuel tags, I used a combination of the ones that are in the JOSM built-in preset and some taginfo search as guidance. For "fuel:blue+", "fuel:diesel_e+" and "fuel:diesel_e+10" I assu... | |
| 11 | 2025-03-30 09:11 | mueschel | Thanks! The best would be to have a picture of the actual pumps. They are required to label them with the actual generic type of fuel. | |
| 12 | 2025-04-01 17:11 | Xavizard Knight ♦12 | I don't think that the generic fuel name is written anywhere near the pumps in Repsol gas stations, everything is filled with the branded fuel logos and colours and such. Although, to be honest, I don't look them much when I go there xDFor now, I've been able to find more info onl... | |
| 164142189 by aweech @ 2025-03-26 23:28 | 1 | 2025-03-29 17:23 | mueschel | Could you check this bicycle parking, it got a strange 'ulock' tag.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12703742720#map=19/40.541773/-112.050004 |
| 2 | 2025-03-31 15:15 | aweech ♦369 | Yes, it is impossible to use a standard u-lock with this parking. As best I can tell there isn't an established scheme for tagging which kinds of locks can be used with bicycle parking. If you know of one, I could switch it to that. | |
| 164212458 by Mihai yli @ 2025-03-28 15:15 | 1 | 2025-03-29 10:49 | mueschel | Hi,you added many 'NUMAR' tags here. Are these housenumbers? These should be tagged as "addr:housenumber". |
| 164168674 by thecommodorefan @ 2025-03-27 15:09 | 1 | 2025-03-28 19:34 | mueschel | Hi,you used a large amount of recycling tags that are not used in any other place. Could you have a look to the Wiki to check the common tags for the materials that can be recycled here?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling |
| 163968059 by Jbensman @ 2025-03-23 00:15 | 1 | 2025-03-24 10:48 | mueschel | Please check your upload routine. 20,000 "gpx:ele=0.0" tags are useless and should not be uploaded. The amount of nodes also suggests that these are coming from an external source and not from a "survey"? |
| 2 | 2025-03-24 16:12 | Jbensman ♦11 | They are USGS data, the same data on the National Topo Map option on the standard editor. I thought we were supposed to select one of the drop down options. But I have started putting the site it is coming from: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/6798da21d34ea8c18376e77fI thought I had i... | |
| 3 | 2025-03-24 16:43 | mueschel | If this is an import, you need to follow the OSM Import Guidelines:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GuidelinesOn the page you linked I couldn't find a license for this data. Are you sure the data is compatible with the requirements of OSM and ODbL? | |
| 4 | 2025-03-24 18:47 | Jbensman ♦11 | I am having a hard time understanding them. The data says "All the data is open and non-proprietary." The exact data is in the default editor under the "USGS National Map" So if it is there does not that mean it is OK to use? Instead of tracing it, I am importing the lines. | |
| 5 | 2025-03-24 18:52 | mueschel | Tracing and copying are different things, and both might be fine or not. The import process is there to find out about such differences before beginning the import. | |
| 6 | 2025-03-24 20:49 | Jbensman ♦11 | Like I said I am having a really hard time figuring this all out. Is this the required approval for the data: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:National_Hydrography_Dataset The data I am using is the data they say the NHD is being replaced with. Thanks for helping me figure this out! | |
| 7 | 2025-03-24 22:07 | Jbensman ♦11 | I have the problem with the tags figured out. In JOSM I selected all and deleted the tag. Took a few seconds. I saved the set to make sure it fixed the problem. But I will stop importing the data until I can figure out if it is OK. Like I said I really appreciate your help! | |
| 164023967 by Aye Aye Nyein @ 2025-03-24 10:19 | 1 | 2025-03-24 10:57 | mueschel | Reminder: Please check your tags for spelling mistakes! Things like "wate way", "wateway", "water way" are useless for OSM. |
| 162378258 by Azhley @ 2025-02-11 07:07 | 1 | 2025-03-23 16:10 | mueschel | Hi,these buildings and plots all got very strange 'name' tags. The 'name' tag is only for the actual name of an object, not for a description or to add a label on a map.Could you have a look and check this? |
| 163869948 by tiankii maker @ 2025-03-20 16:03 | 1 | 2025-03-23 09:22 | mueschel | Please stop spamming the OSM database while testing your software. There is a dedicated development API for this purpose. |
| 2 | 2025-03-30 00:20 | tiankii maker ♦1 | Ok. Understood. | |
| 163877352 by mueschel @ 2025-03-20 19:13 | 1 | 2025-03-21 11:11 | Carole34 ♦1 | Why have you delete my points ? It was a try but i have 248 points to add or modify on Sète. I'm new and i want to understand my mistakes please. |
| 2 | 2025-03-21 18:25 | mueschel | Hi, welcome to OSM.These nodes don't have any common tag to describe what they are. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all software and all other users to understand what they mean. If you look at the tags without knowing what it is and without reading the changeset c... | |
| 163777353 by PengualaHeadphones @ 2025-03-18 14:14 | 1 | 2025-03-20 11:10 | mueschel | Hi,you added two uncommon tags to the bus terminal: "jeep", "tricycle". What do they mean? |
| 163769507 by Mathias_ADAV @ 2025-03-18 11:12 | 1 | 2025-03-19 13:20 | mueschel | Hi,you added many 'ref:insee' - however the common spelling is uppercase 'ref:INSEE'. Could you change that? |
| 2 | 2025-03-19 14:13 | Mathias_ADAV ♦168 | Hi, thanks i did it. I hope there is no others mistake..! | |
| 163664417 by wielandb @ 2025-03-15 19:14 | 1 | 2025-03-18 08:27 | mueschel | "Ein weiteres, nicht Beschreibbares Symbol befindet sich dort" - hast du ein Foto? |
| 2 | 2025-03-18 10:54 | wielandb ♦132 | Schau mal bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4665814 , da sind die Fotos von denen ich ausgegangen bin. Nicht wirklich gut zu erkennen. Ich könnte aber bei Gelegenheit ein dediziertes Foto vom Symbol machen gehen. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-18 16:25 | streckenkundler ♦1,041 | Guten Abend,...kann es dann sein, daß eine Wanderrouten-Relation fehlt, und zwar der grüne Punkt/evt. das fragliche Symbol? Nach den Fotos der Note und nach https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=17.0/50.8126/13.015 müsste es doch eine Route aud Richtung Adelsberg(turm) nach S&... | |
| 4 | 2025-03-20 23:50 | wielandb ♦132 | @mueschel Hab mal ein paar bessere Fotos in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4673623 gemacht. | |
| 5 | 2025-03-20 23:54 | wielandb ♦132 | @streckenkundlerIch hab die Strecken zum Wegweiser hinzugefügt, die in der Nähe zur Verfügung standen und die ich Identifizieren konnte. Mehr kann ich nicht wirklich dazu sagen. :(> ...und was ist "Adelsberger Bike Marathon" für eine Route?Auch da, ich we... | |
| 163698775 by yopaseopor @ 2025-03-16 17:18 | 1 | 2025-03-17 08:49 | mueschel | Hi,may I ask you for a full documentation of this tagging scheme you use since several years? Right now you're the only one who can make sense out of these tags, e.g. there are letters in the number suffixes that nobody else uses. |
| 2 | 2025-03-17 23:34 | yopaseopor ♦68 | Yes, here you have a draft updated to 2025.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Yopaseopor#Alternative_aproximation. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-18 08:11 | mueschel | PLEASE put this to proper discussion and documentation before starting to add dozens of new tags. This scheme is incompatible to all the tools implementing one of the three (!) existing tagging schemes. Not even simple things like destinations in different languages are compatible to the current sch... | |
| 163564869 by ATBirch @ 2025-03-13 10:59 | 1 | 2025-03-17 08:55 | mueschel | Hi,'openable' is a tag currently notin use. Barriers that can be removed are typically tagged as 'movable'. |
| 2 | 2025-03-17 18:12 | osmviborg ♦1,643 | cycle_barrier:installation=openable | |
| 163534730 by Aye Aye Nyein @ 2025-03-12 16:06 | 1 | 2025-03-13 10:40 | mueschel | Please check your recent edits, there are many tags with spelling mistakes like 'sourcee' or 'water way'. |
| 2 | 2025-03-16 09:58 | mueschel | Please pay attention to the direction of waterways - the way in OSM has to point in the same direction as the water flows. | |
| 163536977 by GeoConor @ 2025-03-12 16:54 | 1 | 2025-03-14 18:06 | mueschel | Hi,the keys you added contain spaces and units - this is not common and doesn't follow usual tagging schemes.I also have trouble making sense of the easting/northing - these coordinates seem to point to somewhere close to Chester, but not Belfast. |
| 2 | 2025-03-14 18:41 | GeoConor ♦1 | Hi the GNSS station cords are in Irish Grid National Grid (not OSGB). I would like to keep the numerical values as these are important metadata for users who may use the station. Can you advise correct format? Cheers CG | |
| 3 | 2025-03-15 11:04 | mueschel | We don't yet have a proper scheme for such coordinates, apart from the 'utm' tag. For the moment I'd suggest to use a tag like "coordinates" including all information:coordinates = 12345678 9876543 XYZXYZ would be the system of measurement, e.g. ITM (which seems... | |
| 4 | 2025-03-15 12:10 | GeoConor ♦1 | I can add ITM coords tags. IG75 is still in use in NI and the mapping coordinate system for OSNI. OSI use ITM. Users accessing this public RTK feed will be collecting data in IG | |
| 5 | 2025-03-15 12:12 | GeoConor ♦1 | For mapping etc. Hopefully some OSM mappes will use the feed for field mapping apps etc for 👍🏼 | |
| 163521264 by Mathieu CHEDOZEAU @ 2025-03-12 10:35 | 1 | 2025-03-14 18:25 | mueschel | Hi,could you check the recycling tags you added here? There's a list in the wiki with the tags that should be used:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling#Recycling |
| 163474532 by Thorsten De Souza_ReLUT @ 2025-03-11 08:49 | 1 | 2025-03-13 10:57 | mueschel | Hi,please don't add parking tags to a whole street if they apply only to a very short portion of it. In this case, no parking tags are needed on the road because all parking has been mapped separately due to the varying restriction on each part. |
| 2 | 2025-03-14 08:44 | Thorsten De Souza_ReLUT ♦2 | Hi, thank you for your message. I understand. May I ask which parking tag you refer to? | |
| 3 | 2025-03-14 09:01 | mueschel | All of them, apart from parking:left = separateparking:right = no | |
| 163450387 by didier2020 @ 2025-03-10 16:29 | 1 | 2025-03-12 18:32 | mueschel | Hi,"maxweight:left" is not a common tag - where does this maxweight apply? |
| 2 | 2025-03-13 04:44 | didier2020 ♦91 | hi. It's a mistake => it's now fixed backward | |
| 163486660 by mueschel @ 2025-03-11 14:07 | 1 | 2025-03-12 10:17 | DodoGTA ♦14 | I noticed a piece of paper (next to the one which said that the shop was permanently closing) that mentions the same place is now available for rent with a phone number (so I attempted to map it)Is that out-of-scope for OSM? |
| 2 | 2025-03-12 10:42 | mueschel | That's how I understood the tag. And I'd say rental advertisements like these are definitely out of scope of OSM. There is already a lot of spam in this respect by people who try to use OSM to advertise their real estate which gets removed regularly.If there's a permanent sign wit... | |
| 163506131 by @philt3r @ 2025-03-11 23:30 | 1 | 2025-03-12 08:57 | mueschel | Hi,I don't think that adding private power meters is within the scope of OSM. In general we do not map installations in private residential buildings for privacy reasons, and this seems to be one. I'd like to ask you to ask for some opinions on that in the forums. |
| 2 | 2025-03-12 23:23 | aharvey ♦1,716 | I think what @philt3r is trying to do here is mark houses which have an electricity connection from the grid. I think that would be okay, you can observe this from overhead wires from the street, although that doesn't work in areas where the network is underground.I think it's useful d... | |
| 163210656 by Cybereric @ 2025-03-04 16:56 | 1 | 2025-03-11 19:03 | mueschel | Hi,I see that you introduce a large set of new tags to describe monuments. In general this seems to be a good idea with a reasonable tagging scheme.Nevertheless I think it would be good to have this scheme fully documented and discussed in the community before there are too many objects added.... |
| 163464825 by Caleb NHVR @ 2025-03-11 00:32 | 1 | 2025-03-11 14:47 | mueschel | Hi,could you check the other highway reference tags? The spelling of 'ref:au.QLD.noosa.bridge.assetno' doesn't agree with the common onee.g. "ref:AU-QLD:ipswich:culvert"https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=ref%3AAU- |
| 2 | 2025-03-11 23:56 | Caleb NHVR ♦10 | Thanks mueschel, I'll amend the inconsistency between these tags shortly - reference tags following ref:AU-QLD:ipswich:culvert tagging convention was the intended approach. Cheers | |
| 163388746 by uak @ 2025-03-09 07:25 | 1 | 2025-03-11 14:28 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this relation, it got a incomplete "charge:condition" tag. |
| 163364117 by mueschel @ 2025-03-08 13:23 | 1 | 2025-03-10 18:14 | Xvtn ♦468 | Howdy! I agree with the removal of lift_tickets as it is not used (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/lift_tickets#overview), but rental=no seems appropriate? Why move that to description? |
| 2 | 2025-03-10 18:49 | mueschel | If you like, you can add it, but it needs to be more specific. The POI is a restaurant, so I wouldn't expect any kind of rental there.I see how someone might assume some rental shop here, but I think the description is better - it's very unlikely that any software shows the negative &quo... | |
| 163358970 by Xavizard Knight @ 2025-03-08 11:11 | 1 | 2025-03-09 08:57 | mueschel | Hi,this destination sign got again about 20 new keys that are not used in other places. There's a problem with the numbered tags: - I wouldn't use numbered tags on a single-panel sign, if you want to have a change to tag different panels on other signs. Numbers are more or less the... |
| 2 | 2025-03-09 16:12 | Xavizard Knight ♦12 | Hello again!This time these signs are properly tagged.The traffic signs added in this commit are using the "Traffic signs_ES" JOSM tag preset by yopaseopor.This adding of traffic signs comes from an agreement from the Catalan community for mapping the traffic signs using his pres... | |
| 3 | 2025-03-09 16:45 | mueschel | I know that these tags come from a preset. The problem is that the tagging scheme has neither been discussed nor documented, but is being pushed forward by a single user. Due to the missing documentation and discussion, there is no and will be no support from any tool.In fact I can't see an... | |
| 163315435 by uᴉʍOꓨ @ 2025-03-07 08:11 | 1 | 2025-03-09 10:22 | mueschel | Please check the 'rickshaw' tags you added. These are not in use in OSM. Did you mean auto_rickshaw or cycle_rickshaw? |
| 2 | 2025-03-09 21:20 | uᴉʍOꓨ ♦19 | It's been updated. Thank you for the heads-up! | |
| 163301826 by Kovoschiz @ 2025-03-06 20:52 | 1 | 2025-03-08 13:41 | mueschel | Hi,is that reverted correctly? This shop node now got completely different tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11655897469/history |
| 163222853 by ENGELBERT MODO @ 2025-03-04 23:08 | 1 | 2025-03-05 20:15 | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong here. All these nodes don't have valid tags.If you want to import a larger number of objects, please have a look to our import guidelines:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 2 | 2025-03-05 20:57 | ENGELBERT MODO ♦9 | Hi thanks for your comment can you please precise which tag is wrong ? | |
| 3 | 2025-03-05 21:24 | mueschel | All nodes have these wrong tags: Nom = \tFondation médicale Saint Raphael amenity = \tbatiment Public categorie = \tStructure privée institution_de_tutelle = MINSANTE xcoord = \t11.6037621 ycoord =\t3.9778637There is no correct source given and the mandat... | |
| 4 | 2025-03-08 09:26 | mueschel | I reverted this import for now so that you can start importing these objects again in a clean way. | |
| 163219347 by Ladhari @ 2025-03-04 20:57 | 1 | 2025-03-08 09:20 | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag "gtfs:ref" here. This is not used in other places. Could you check the documentation for the correct tag? Might be gtfs:stop_id |
| 163344299 by Carl Nowack @ 2025-03-07 21:28 | 1 | 2025-03-08 09:06 | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong here.First, different languages are given using a ":xx" prefix, not "_xx". It's also not necessary to give several translations if the Latin name is given - all translations can generated automatically with a simple software, there is no need to h... |
| 163252342 by teusito29 @ 2025-03-05 16:52 | 1 | 2025-03-07 11:03 | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong here. All these objects don't have any valid tag. Also: Please don't forget to add meaningful changeset comments to your edits! |
| 163223654 by ENGELBERT MODO @ 2025-03-04 23:52 | 1 | 2025-03-05 20:21 | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong here. All these nodes don't have valid tags.If you want to import a larger number of objects, please have a look to our import guidelines:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 2 | 2025-03-05 21:07 | ENGELBERT MODO ♦9 | Thank mueschel pls can you give me more information abut which tag is wrong ? | |
| 3 | 2025-03-05 21:23 | mueschel | All nodes have these tags:etat = Fonctionnelniveau_de_degradation =\televexcoord = 11.5779586ycoord = 3.9436049There is no correct source given and the mandatory link to an import documentation is missing. | |
| 162990145 by Agaric @ 2025-02-26 21:59 | 1 | 2025-02-28 11:33 | mueschel | Hi,I tried to find out if there is a way to put all the opening hours into one tag but got a bit confused. It seems like the times you added for Jul-Aug are valid only on a few days, because the rest of the two month would be covered by school holidays. Or are the Jul-Aug times valid for the w... |
| 2 | 2025-03-04 21:26 | Agaric ♦14 | En France, il y a les vacances estivales qui ont des dates assez immuables (juillet-août) et les vacances scolaires qui changent d'une année sur l'autre.Le souci c'est que l'information sur les autres prend trop de caractères (plus que les 255 autoris&eacu... | |
| 3 | 2025-03-05 21:18 | mueschel | I think I managed:https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Tu-Fr%2012%3A00-13%3A45%2C16%3A30-19%3A30%2CTu%2CFr%2019%3A30-21%3A30%2CWe%2013%3A45-16%3A30%2CSH%20Mo%2012%3A00-19%3A30%2CSH%2013%3A45-16%3A30%2CSu%2CPH%2010%3A00-19%3A00%2CSa%2014%3A30-19%3A00%2CJul-Aug%20SH%20Tu-Su%2010%... | |
| 163223918 by ENGELBERT MODO @ 2025-03-05 00:12 | 1 | 2025-03-05 20:21 | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong here. All these nodes don't have valid tags.If you want to import a larger number of objects, please have a look to our import guidelines:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 163191055 by pyrog @ 2025-03-04 08:36 | 1 | 2025-03-04 14:08 | mueschel | Hi,"destination:side" seems to be new, how is A/B defined precisely?By the way, it seems the panoramax images on the destination_signs don't work, the API claims they don't exist, e.g.https://api.panoramax.xyz/#focus=pic&pic=f7042b1c-c2dd-487c-81ed-5db5c6c487cehttps... |
| 163113395 by mueschel @ 2025-03-02 09:18 | 1 | 2025-03-02 13:06 | Xavizard Knight ♦12 | Hello! Your contributions of this changeset make no sense.You've moved the translated inscription to a new tag "inscription:es-t-la"This -t- setup is the first time that I heard about it, and despite it is used elsewhere (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=-t-), it seems... |
| 2 | 2025-03-02 13:28 | mueschel | What was in the name tag was a description of the plaque, but not a proper name.All the "inscription:translation:es:description:XX" tags are nothing else than the source of the translated transcription, so they should be in a source tag.The -t- syntax is a standard also outside OS... | |
| 3 | 2025-03-03 16:58 | Xavizard Knight ♦12 | I understand your logic behind some of your tag changes and rearrangements, but I disagree on some.The name fits a description better, true, but so are literally all the names of monuments, plaques and memorials. Very few memorials do have a "title" in it that is its official name. Man... | |
| 4 | 2025-03-03 19:20 | mueschel | Regarding the name, I wouldn't add any name tag if there is just a description and no real name. At most I'd add the name of the subject in the name tag.Regarding the rest: 👍 | |
| 162962748 by Aneta Zwierzynová @ 2025-02-26 09:00 | 1 | 2025-02-27 09:37 | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!I see that you added a couple of 'recycling' tags. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.Could you have a look to the wiki and change the tags to those listed there?http... |
| 2 | 2025-02-27 10:52 | Aneta Zwierzynová ♦1 | Dobrý den, změnila jsem značky na vámí uvedené ve https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/. Akorát některé se mi nepřepsaly do češtiny a zůstaly v angličtine. Např. metal - je to chyba? | |
| 3 | 2025-02-27 11:06 | mueschel | The tags you added are perfectly fine. In the database itself, it's always the English name that is stored. The editor software translates them for your convenience. If something is missing in the translation table, it will show the English original. This will happen quite often with rarer tags... | |
| 4 | 2025-02-27 11:10 | Aneta Zwierzynová ♦1 | Děkuji za vysvětlení a přeji hezký den. | |
| 162879591 by SinamGomap @ 2025-02-24 07:48 Active block | 1 | 2025-02-25 08:43 | mueschel | Welcome to OSM.please don't just dump a large set of data into our database. I suggest that you start with some basic editing of individual objects. Later you can come back to an import - but this is a complicated task, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 2 | 2025-02-25 10:06 | mavl ♦76,060 | This changeset is reverted. The reason: the duplicates of objects. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-06 10:09 | NeisReview ♦880 | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163275766 | |
| 162864199 by tracker51 @ 2025-02-23 18:21 | 1 | 2025-02-24 11:03 | mueschel | Hi,schau mal nach dieser Ladestation - die Angabe des Stecker-Typs fehlt:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12090042058 |
| 2 | 2025-02-24 17:57 | tracker51 ♦13 | Hi mueschel,das ist mir klar.Leider befinden sich die Anschlüsse hinter kleinen verschlossenen Türchen. Den Schlüssel dafür bekommt man beim nahen Bäcker gegen 10,- € Pfand. https://www.directupload.eu/file/d/8840/c5qsonuj_jpgAls ich am Sonntag da war, war d... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-24 18:04 | mueschel | Klingt nach Schuko, aber wer weiß...Wir haben aber tagging-mäßig vorgesorgt mit "socket:unknown=4" und "socket:unknown:output=8" | |
| 4 | 2025-02-26 15:56 | tracker51 ♦13 | Danke für den Spickzettel. Hab's heute erledigt - siehe auch PM ... | |
| 162860373 by icke68746 @ 2025-02-23 16:35 | 1 | 2025-02-24 11:00 | mueschel | Hi,was ist denn ein "foot_trigger"? |
| 2 | 2025-02-24 21:42 | icke68746 ♦10 | Hi,ich habe es von ChatGPT:"Falls die Fußgängerampel auch die vorgelagerte Ampel für den Straßenverkehr steuert (was wahrscheinlich ist), kannst du das noch genauer beschreiben mit: traffic_signals:foot_trigger=yesDas gibt an, dass die Fußgängeram... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-25 08:57 | icke68746 ♦10 | Hi,habe ich rausgenommen, war wohl eine Phantasie von ChatGPT :-( .Gruß Icke68746 | |
| 162835328 by Manu1400 @ 2025-02-22 23:49 | 1 | 2025-02-23 15:34 | mueschel | Hi,it seems there is a mistake in the wiki.The source tag should be source:quiet_hours - "source" is almost always used as a prefix.This is also as mentioned in the text in the Wiki, but the example below shows a wrong tag.Could you check & edit the POIs? |
| 161669112 by Antti72 @ 2025-01-23 10:49 | 1 | 2025-01-24 10:04 | mueschel | Hi,"recycling:Pienmetalli" is not used in other places. Could you explain which types of metal this include to find a common tag? |
| 2 | 2025-01-24 15:52 | Antti72 ♦4 | Hi,Did you get my message? | |
| 3 | 2025-01-24 15:56 | mueschel | No, I didn't get another message. | |
| 4 | 2025-01-24 16:06 | Antti72 ♦4 | Did I succeed now? | |
| 5 | 2025-01-24 16:52 | mueschel | I think the pictures you show me fit well for recycling:metal_packaging plusrecycling:cansThere seems to be symbol of a cooking pot on the container, but I don't think we have a tag for this yet. | |
| 6 | 2025-02-20 14:58 | lankapuhelin ♦58 | How about metal or small_metal? As on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling | |
| 7 | 2025-02-21 09:25 | Antti72 ♦4 | What should I do about it, the previous one didn't seem to fix it? | |
| 8 | 2025-02-21 09:38 | mueschel | "small_metal" in addition to the two tags I mentioned ("metal_packaging", "cans") seems to reflect the examples quite well. I think you can just add these three tags instead of the original one. | |
| 162637443 by Rohan Kr @ 2025-02-17 22:13 | 1 | 2025-02-18 13:44 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/12596683288. Did you mean amenity=bankname= State Bank of India? |
| 2 | 2025-02-18 13:45 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Please describe the objects! Name only objects are useless! | |
| 3 | 2025-02-18 19:53 | mueschel | I suggest to remove the ~ 100 objects that are not tagged correctly for now. Then you can more easily enter them again using the presets available in the editor. That's simpler than trying to edit them in place. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-19 12:47 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Welcome to OSM (again)! I completely reverted your changeset. If you need support for a better way to map the objects, I recommend the wiki.osm.org or the local mapper community. But of course you can also ask directly. | |
| 162577837 by eikleinbaum @ 2025-02-16 16:28 | 1 | 2025-02-18 19:16 | mueschel | Hi,these bus stops got three strange tags:stop_codestop_descstop_urlThe first one is a duplicate of 'ref'. Did you really mean to add these tags?'wheelchair_boarding' is also not an established tag - bus stops are typically tagged with 'wheelchair'. |
| 2 | 2025-02-18 19:41 | eikleinbaum ♦2 | Thanks. Forgot to remove the tags from the data source. I'll update these. | |
| 162568989 by Shoorick @ 2025-02-16 12:36 | 1 | 2025-02-18 13:45 | mueschel | Hi,could you consider another tag instead of "maxheight:fall"? maxheight always refers to a legal height limit, which you tag does not.Something lime 'hazard:fall:height' might be more appropriate |
| 2 | 2025-02-18 16:18 | Shoorick ♦30 | Hi,It’s maximal height of fall (Максимална висина пада in Serbian). | |
| 3 | 2025-02-18 16:29 | mueschel | Yes, I understood that - but the choice of the tag doesn't fit to what OSM uses as definition for 'maxheight'. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-18 16:37 | Shoorick ♦30 | Fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/162668303 | |
| 161869095 by mueschel @ 2025-01-28 18:30 | 1 | 2025-02-16 21:26 | rodolfovargas ♦50 | Hola.Me parece que no corresponde "daño, damage", porque están en situación de "emergencia", peligro, vulnerables. Evidentemente la etiqueta "emergency" no existe en los Tag de OSM, pero muy bien debería diferenciarse de destruido, que ... |
| 2 | 2025-02-16 22:05 | mueschel | The tag "emergency" has a different meaning, it's not used to tag an abstract danger of some kind. That would be "hazard". Or, in the case of flooding, the common tag is "flood_prone".If the buildings just were in danger of being flooded once, but nothing happe... | |
| 162565874 by mueschel @ 2025-02-16 11:03 | 1 | 2025-02-16 17:10 | mcliquid ♦1,852 | Grüß dich, ist das Tagging falsch? Das wird hier so vorgeschlagen: https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE?signs=DE:240,1000-33 |
| 2 | 2025-02-16 17:23 | mueschel | Das sieht nach einem Bug aus. Das Tag "oneway:cycleway" gibt es nämlich nicht. "oneway" oder "oneway:bicycle" wäre korrekt. An Straßen gäbes dann noch "cycleway:left:oneway" als Möglichkeit. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-16 17:24 | mueschel | https://github.com/osmberlin/osm-traffic-sign-tool/issues/72 | |
| 4 | 2025-02-16 17:27 | mcliquid ♦1,852 | Danke für das Ticket! Hatte 2 Minuten davor gesucht und nichts gefunden :) | |
| 162504190 by Marcello Perathoner @ 2025-02-14 13:48 | 1 | 2025-02-16 11:14 | mueschel | Hi,you added "efa:*" tags here. These are not used in other places. Aren't they meant to be "gtfs:*"? |
| 2 | 2025-02-16 11:50 | Marcello Perathoner ♦24 | They don't have a GTFS feed, or at least I didn't find one. But they use the EFA software by Mentz. EFA ids are similar but not quite the same as GTFS. | |
| 162532783 by darkonus @ 2025-02-15 11:35 | 1 | 2025-02-16 10:58 | mueschel | Hi,could you point us to a discussion of this change? LL-t-LL tags for transliteration are very rare in OSM, while adding -Script to a language is the common way for names in different alphabets. |
| 2 | 2025-02-16 14:13 | darkonus ♦84 | Hello! These tags are indeed new; here is the discussion about them: https://c.osm.org/t/tagging-names-transformed-from-one-language-to-another/125144en-Cyrl and it-Cyrl are not entirely accurate because the names were not just converted to Cyrillic but specifically transformed into the Ukrainia... | |
| 162484944 by Mauricyo Sousa @ 2025-02-13 23:49 | 1 | 2025-02-15 14:56 | mueschel | Something went wrong here. Most of these objects don't have valid tags, many are duplicates of existing POIs, all have a foreign 'gpxicon' tag that shouldn't appear in OSM. |
| 2 | 2025-02-16 10:10 | Mauricyo Sousa ♦1 | Esse gpxcon dados de um aplicativo de acolhimento de dados que uso, fica essas tags gravado | |
| 3 | 2025-02-16 10:27 | mueschel | Please don't dump all your recorded POIs into the OSM database. Edit them one by one, and upload only those that you reviewed and where you added the proper tags. | |
| 162563523 by mueschel @ 2025-02-16 09:41 | 1 | 2025-02-16 09:51 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,068 | Why not revert? |
| 2 | 2025-02-16 10:06 | mueschel | The larger part of the edit looks quite reasonable to me. If you disagree, feel free to revert including my changes. | |
| 162441296 by O Bicho Geográfico @ 2025-02-12 18:40 | 1 | 2025-02-14 11:02 | mueschel | Please check this area, it doesn't have any valid taghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359381878 |
| 162469738 by suyhoo @ 2025-02-13 14:48 | 1 | 2025-02-14 10:25 | mueschel | Hi,bitte schau nochmal über die ganzen Wegweiser-Tags. Bei vielen stimmt die Reihenfolge im Key nicht, z.B. destination:forward:lanes -> destination:lanes:forwarddestination:backward:lanes:colour->destination:colour:lanes:backward |
| 162389988 by Silva1989 @ 2025-02-11 12:57 | 1 | 2025-02-12 18:44 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way without valid tags?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359041111#map=16/39.43509/-31.20944 |
| 2 | 2025-02-12 20:50 | Silva1989 ♦64 | Hi mueschel. Thanks a lot for pointing this out.The line was a stub and was mistrakenly added by pasting twice.I'v fixed the issue though changeset 162444922. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162444922 | |
| 162386653 by notmyproblem1 @ 2025-02-11 11:24 | 1 | 2025-02-12 12:13 | mueschel | Hi,you added about 30 tags that are not used in any other place - this is (in general) too much for a simple shop.Usually we don't map all the different services and products of a shop in detail - that is just too much information for a geo-database like OSM.For some other tags, check... |
| 162403271 by MonsterKlaus @ 2025-02-11 18:51 | 1 | 2025-02-12 11:07 | mueschel | Hi,ich habe ein paar "authentification" Tags korrigiert - korrekt heißt es "authentication". |
| 2 | 2025-02-12 12:54 | MonsterKlaus ♦16 | Hallo und danke dafür. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-12 13:04 | MonsterKlaus ♦16 | Du hast es sogar mehrfach korrigiert! So habe ich nun dank deiner Hilfe gemerkt, dass ich den Fehler in einer Voreinstellung in GoMap! gemacht hatte. Das habe ich nun korrigiert. Deshalb nochmals danke für den Hinweis. | |
| 162236409 by thetornado76 @ 2025-02-07 09:05 | 1 | 2025-02-11 19:19 | mueschel | Hi,you started to use the tag parking:both:ticket:zoneI'm aware the Wiki lags a way to distinguish ticket and resident zones.There's already parking:both:zone:residents in use. I therefore suggest to use the same order in the key here:parking:both:zone:ticket |
| 2 | 2025-02-12 06:38 | thetornado76 ♦162 | Hello, I was missing a suitable tag, so I chose this one. However, I have just seen that parking:both:fee:zone is also in use. This would probably be better instead of parking:both:ticket:zone. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-12 08:51 | mueschel | Seems fine to me. I think we should have it documented on the Street_Parking wiki page. | |
| 162353352 by mosafer @ 2025-02-10 14:25 | 1 | 2025-02-11 09:37 | mueschel | Something went wrong here - there are 55000 new objects without any proper tag. |
| 2 | 2025-02-11 18:40 | mueschel | I reverted these changes. | |
| 162301051 by MassimilianoDS @ 2025-02-09 04:00 | 1 | 2025-02-11 11:29 | mueschel | Hi,could you check the waste amenities added here?- a "waste_transfer_station" is usually a larger industrial complex, but not containers in a residential area- the different things collected are usually tagged as 'recycling:*', not with the 'waste' tag- what ... |
| 2 | 2025-02-11 11:43 | MassimilianoDS ♦2 | Hello, thanks for your advice, I will change the items as sono as possibile. “Tax” is related to the fact that al the recycling container I marked are only settled for resident citizens and for that we pay annual fee to the city council “Comune di Tuscania”. The doors of the ... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-11 11:45 | MassimilianoDS ♦2 | I will post a photo ad sono ad possibile | |
| 4 | 2025-02-11 11:47 | mueschel | If only residents have access using an QR code, you can tag this asauthentication:qrcode=yesaccess = residentsI would not add a payment tag, because there is no way to pay for the containers directly. | |
| 5 | 2025-02-11 11:54 | MassimilianoDS ♦2 | Ok I’ll take tour advice and will change when at home. I’m new concerning Map updates, just learning how…. Greets | |
| 162345884 by Le_Sharkoïste @ 2025-02-10 11:13 | 1 | 2025-02-11 09:35 | mueschel | Hi,you added a strange "sharko" tag to thousands of objects. Was this added by mistake? |
| 162304683 by lemonardo @ 2025-02-09 08:30 | 1 | 2025-02-10 18:28 | mueschel | Hi,there are a couple of tags here that are not in use up to now. Could you point us to a definition of them? Numeric "level" values are always quite difficult to understand without a proper definition. noise_level = 3 safety_level = 4 security_level = 4 soundproof_level = ... |
| 162237478 by mueschel @ 2025-02-07 09:37 | 1 | 2025-02-08 23:15 | Mortein ♦4 | The mobile numbers are for different countries (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Support_for_multiple_countries), they should not be merged. |
| 2 | 2025-02-09 09:24 | mueschel | The phone numbers are *from* different countries, but not *for* different countries. Both have a country prefix and are reachable from anywhere in the world. The phone:XX tags with country suffixes are used for local phone numbers (often toll-free or special numbers) that are only usable within on... | |
| 161972973 by DaveF @ 2025-01-31 11:10 | 1 | 2025-02-02 09:47 | mueschel | Hi,naptan tags with a suffix for station parts are not in use up to now. Would it be possible to add them to different objects instead? The main node could get both values as a list as well. |
| 2 | 2025-02-02 12:18 | DaveF ♦1,563 | What would you suggest, bearing in mind Liverpool St. NR/Eliz is deemed as one station?Are Atcos used? | |
| 3 | 2025-02-08 09:44 | mueschel | It's hard to judge what the best solution is. If the codes refer to different parts of the station, I would map them as such. If the station just has two codes, I'd add them in the main tag as a list.Nevertheless, could you decide for one spelling of the suffix?E.g. there are:netwo... | |
| 162165653 by Robert Whittaker @ 2025-02-05 13:29 | 1 | 2025-02-06 15:54 | mueschel | Hi Robert,I see that you started to use a properly namespaced version of cqc location ids. Could you also have a look to the 100 existingcqc:location:idcqc:location_idand check if they can be updated as well? |
| 162089326 by cloudVoicerHub @ 2025-02-03 14:27 | 1 | 2025-02-04 15:04 | mueschel | Please check the tags you added on all these gas stations.You claim the source is "Official Ukrnafta data" - is this data available under a license that is compatible with ODbL and OSM?These are not common addr tags:addr:ISO3166-2-lvl4addr:house_numberaddr:municipalityadd... |
| 2 | 2025-02-07 10:38 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202 | |
| 162082147 by mueschel @ 2025-02-03 11:50 | 1 | 2025-02-03 23:51 | BurritoKing ♦2 | This one is actually kind of weird - from the park website I think you cannot fish as an adult, ONLY as < 17 with an adult:"Fishing is permitted at Shypond only for children 17 years and younger while accompanied by an adult."This confused me too! |
| 2 | 2025-02-04 11:38 | mueschel | Thanks! I just changed the conditional accordingly | |
| 162081859 by mueschel @ 2025-02-03 11:44 | 1 | 2025-02-03 12:40 | Tatfahren ♦271 | Du hast hier ein fixme hinzugefügt das die Wasserablaufrinne genauer getaggt werden soll. Was meinst du was hier passen könnte?Es handelt sich um eine Rinne dieser Art (Beispiel: https://www.wasserundsteine.de/naturstein-baumaterial/schwerlast-betonrinne-fortis-edelstahl.html)Das e... |
| 2 | 2025-02-03 12:44 | mueschel | Da habe ich auch keine gute Idee.Ich hatte den Weg nur editiert weil er außerdem noch ein anderes Tag hatte, das da nicht hingehört:"iD_validator_skip_to_allow_upload=yes" | |
| 3 | 2025-02-03 12:53 | Tatfahren ♦271 | Dazu zwingt mich leider der iD validator, der sieht einen "note" nicht als tag an und verweigert dann den Upload des gesamten changesets aufgrund eines "objektes ohne beschreibende Eigenschaften". | |
| 162041979 by Spring Dream @ 2025-02-02 11:30 | 1 | 2025-02-03 09:10 | mueschel | Hi,please watch out for the correct spelling of tags. NeitherHighway = residential norhihgway = residentialare proper tags for streets in OSM. The only correct form is highway = residential |
| 162017278 by martien-176 @ 2025-02-01 16:21 | 1 | 2025-02-02 10:28 | mueschel | Hi,you added "Chido" to your damage* keys. That's not common for other events - usually the plain tags damage:event and damage:date are used. Could you check and maybe change the tagging? |
| 2 | 2025-02-02 16:08 | SeverinGeo ♦23 | Hello, because I thought this would be easier for future similar assessments, making it possible to keep track of Chido while easily adding new assessments. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-03 09:02 | mueschel | If there is a consensus to add tags this way, it might be helpful. If only you use these tags its not: Others searching for this event will look for "Chido" in the value of a "damage:event" tag, which doesn't exist on these buildings. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-03 11:13 | SeverinGeo ♦23 | Hi, this is part of a test project (https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/18320) and the methodology has changed a bit during thise test. I am the contributor coordinating this mapping over Mayotte and the author of the presets dedicated to it, so all contributors will now also use these tags. As I exp... | |
| 5 | 2025-02-03 11:16 | SeverinGeo ♦23 | Anyway, thanks for your input! If you have tried the map with the instructions, I would be interested to hear your feedback. | |
| 131050038 by mueschel @ 2023-01-09 11:12 | 1 | 2025-02-01 16:53 | The_Raven ♦8 | Habe heute dieses Dach von OSM entfernt weil es nicht mehr da ist. War das richtig oder war dieser Eintrag "Virtuell" damit man weiss das es mal hier stand? |
| 2 | 2025-02-01 17:24 | mueschel | Da kann ich wenig dazu sagen, ich hatte hier nur einen Tippfehler korrigiert. Wenn sich Leute dafür interessieren könnten, kann man das Objekt sicher auch noch länger in OSM lassen damit es gefunden wird, inklusive dem Verweis auf den neuen Standort. Falsch ist das Löschen aber a... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-01 18:55 | The_Raven ♦8 | Danke dir für die Antwort. Habe zwischenzeitlich noch etwas darüber gelesen/geforscht. Ist echt etwas kniffelig (löschen oder lassen). Ich glaube aber löschen ist die "bessere" Option. Ich lasse es daher mal so. Gute Zeit und happy mapping! :-) | |
| 161968574 by SimonPoole @ 2025-01-31 08:57 | 1 | 2025-01-31 11:43 | mueschel | Hi Simon,could you check the boundaries you edited? Several of them got some strange tags on their new ways like this onehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355623169 |
| 2 | 2025-01-31 12:17 | SimonPoole ♦339 | the are two three ways were I didn't delete the original properties will fix in a bit. | |
| 161936440 by mueschel @ 2025-01-30 12:56 | 1 | 2025-01-31 07:00 | APneunzehn74 ♦135 | Hallo mueschel, was spricht hier dagegen wie es zuvor mit greenfield eingetragen war?Grüße Andreas |
| 2 | 2025-01-31 08:45 | mueschel | Hi,"landuse:use" gibt es nicht (weder dokumentiert noch irgendwo benutzt und damit nirgends unterstützt). Wie das Wiki schreibt ist "greenland" etwas problematisch, weil es nicht die momentane Nutzung beschreibt wie ein übliches "landuse". Mit dem "... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-31 09:52 | APneunzehn74 ♦135 | Alles klar, danke für die Aufklärung. | |
| 161768553 by M_9999 @ 2025-01-26 04:40 | 1 | 2025-01-28 11:22 | mueschel | Hi,"staffed_hours" is not used up to now. Is there any particular feature that is only available during these hours? You could use opening_hours for this, likeMo-Fr 10:00-20:00 || open "no staff present" |
| 2 | 2025-01-29 09:03 | M_9999 ♦1 | The hours specified are the times during which the train station is attended by staff. Staff may assist passengers with boarding trains, purchasing train tickets, planning journeys, and provide other forms of assistance if required. I'm not sure if opening_hours is an appropriate tag as train s... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-29 18:50 | mueschel | The idea of the tag as I wrote it is that it is indeed open 24/7. The second part defines it do be "open" at any time, just with additional note that no staff is present.If there is a larger interest in explicitly tagging "hours staff is present for any kind of help or consultatio... | |
| 160237777 by mueschel @ 2024-12-13 09:36 | 1 | 2025-01-29 12:46 | TaiB2C ♦1 | You should use the form of `@username@mastodon.homeserver` if you want a complete reference to a specific Mastodon account without the URL; as your edit removed reference to the correct Mastodon homeserver. (Not everyone uses the main/popular `mastodon.social` server.) |
| 2 | 2025-01-29 15:13 | mueschel | Right. I'll fix that later. | |
| 161873090 by Sahar Mustafa 2025 @ 2025-01-28 20:44 | 1 | 2025-01-29 08:19 | mueschel | Hi,Please check the name tags you added. You used the keys 'name-ar' and 'name-en' instead of the correct 'name:ar' and 'name:en'. |
| 151104523 by mueschel @ 2024-05-09 14:51 | 1 | 2025-01-28 22:40 | JeroenvanderGun ♦182 | The legal basis for the zones is tied to the side of the road rather than the direction of travel (e.g. pedestrians can walk on the left), hence the choice for :left/:right instead of :forward/:backward is intentional and matches the tagging of other roads on a boundary. Data consumers can take driv... |
| 2 | 2025-01-29 07:09 | mueschel | Hi,left/right usually refers to a feature besides the main feature, e.g. a sidewalk on the side of the highway, but not to the left and right half of an object.While the regulation obviously depends on the left/right half of the road, I think backward/forward is the closest we can get to in OS... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-30 19:00 | JeroenvanderGun ♦182 | left and right can be and are used for both. For example, if you use name:left and name:right, this doesn't imply an unnamed space between both names. If you want to refer to a specific feature on the side instead of half the feature, you'd use something like sidewalk:right:name instead of... | |
| 161528716 by mapperue @ 2025-01-19 15:21 | 1 | 2025-01-21 18:13 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain what "socket:12V" is? This tag is not used in other places up to now. |
| 2 | 2025-01-21 22:38 | mapperue ♦224 | Hi,it is automobile auxiliary power outlet.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_auxiliary_power_outletI couldn't find suitable tag on the OSM wiki. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-28 18:28 | mueschel | According to wikipedia the standard isJ563-Bhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_auxiliary_power_outletThe spelling "socket:j563-B" with a minor letter fits to the other j-Standards we already have like socket:j3105-2 | |
| 161800804 by BENJAMINMontiel @ 2025-01-27 01:33 | 1 | 2025-01-28 18:17 | mueschel | Reminder:I found many keys likecorreoelec =telefono =sitio web =Please make sure you use the correct tags for these:emailphonewebsiteIn OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. |
| 161771325 by BCNorwich @ 2025-01-26 08:17 | 1 | 2025-01-28 14:09 | mueschel | Could you check this way, it got two strange tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96007149 |
| 2 | 2025-01-28 17:21 | BCNorwich ♦4,851 | Hi, Thanks for drawing my attention here. Yes a mistake on my part in placing part of the tag value in the key. It's a Public Right of Way so the tags are designated=public_footpathprow_ref=Hartwith cum Winsley BR 15.55/72/1I've corrected it.Regards Bernard. | |
| 161776907 by pyrog @ 2025-01-26 11:47 | 1 | 2025-01-27 18:44 | mueschel | Hi,you used destination:arrows tags here. On destination tags on ways the singular "arrow" is used. I'd rather suggest to use the "direction_north" tagging scheme - Without the orientation of the sign it is difficult to correctly interpret the direction these arrows ar... |
| 2 | 2025-01-28 12:27 | pyrog ♦336 | In France usually hiking signs aren't oriented to cardinals directions.The destination:arrow tag show only if the arrow point to the left or to the right of the finger (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fingerpost).Or how the arrow is painted on the sign (See https://wiki.openstreetmap.... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-28 12:36 | mueschel | I don't see anything special on the (mostly English) signs the wiki article contains.The destination:arrow tags in the wiki are only helpful if we know the orientation of the sign (unless you want to tag the sign only without relating it to any way close by)What do you mean by "are... | |
| 161796025 by davča95 @ 2025-01-26 21:23 | 1 | 2025-01-27 10:34 | mueschel | Hi,it looks like something went wrong with this and the other 20 bicycle service stations you added. They all got very strange tags like "service:bicycle:sada_torx_klíčů_(9,_10,_15,_20,_25,_27,_30,_40_mm)"Please make sure you only use the common service:bicycle:* tags and do... |
| 161764396 by Mauricyo Sousa @ 2025-01-25 23:12 | 1 | 2025-01-26 11:25 | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong here. Most of these nodes don't have any valid tag.I suggest to revert this changeset, so that the shops can be added properly one by one with correct tags. |
| 154914050 by Enovale @ 2024-08-07 01:09 | 1 | 2025-01-26 10:26 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this building? It seems to small for a warehouse, to large for a give_box, and 'cans' is not used anywhere else.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1201806251/history |
| 161724679 by Bruce_Wayne_Firefighter @ 2025-01-24 18:59 | 1 | 2025-01-25 18:31 | mueschel | Hi,the tag "card_lock" is not used in any other places. What do you want to tag? A payment or authentication method? |
| 161712303 by surveyor54 @ 2025-01-24 13:22 | 1 | 2025-01-25 18:30 | mueschel | Hi,was meinst du mit charging:adhoc?Wäre das nicht eventuell authentication:none=yes |
| 161721452 by thetornado76 @ 2025-01-24 17:20 | 1 | 2025-01-25 18:13 | mueschel | Hi,when you update parking tags, it might be better not to try to change these 13 year old tags likeparking:lane:both:capacity:free:hourly:winterI think we can be sure that they are totally outdated and don't serve any purpose despite documenting past attempts to tag free capacities. |
| 2 | 2025-01-25 22:17 | thetornado76 ♦162 | Hello, when adjusting the outdated parking values, I also tried to correct the unusual values. I didn't see that at 13 years old. You're right, these are definitely completely outdated and it makes little sense to adapt them. | |
| 161719082 by wielandb @ 2025-01-24 16:15 | 1 | 2025-01-25 09:54 | mueschel | Hallo,was heißt denn "destination:ref:partial"? |
| 2 | 2025-01-25 15:14 | wielandb ♦132 | Hey,ich habe versucht mir einen Tag zu überlegen, mit dem ich darstellen kann, dass eine Bundesstraße mit so einem gestrichelten Kästchen dargestellt wird. Da kannte ich noch nichts anderes, deswegen habe ich mal diesen Tag benutzt, um es irgendwie zu verzeichnen. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-25 16:01 | mueschel | Was ist das denn für eine Chemnitzer Spezialität und was soll es bedeuten? Das habe ich noch nie irgendwo gesehen. Der längeren Anfahrt zur B 169/173 nach zu urteilen ist das doch nichts anderes als ein destination:ref:to? | |
| 4 | 2025-01-26 15:34 | wielandb ♦132 | Also ob das nur in Chemnitz vorkommt weiß ich nicht, ich hab es auf jeden Fall auch schon anderswo in Sachsen gesehen, vielleicht ist es ein sächsisches Ding... 🤔So wie ich es verstanden habe, ist der Unterschied, dass z.B. "zur [164] Marienberg" bedeutet, wenn man jetzt ... | |
| 161715688 by CartoKees @ 2025-01-24 14:54 | 1 | 2025-01-25 09:23 | mueschel | Hi,there are a couple of areas with strange tags - where they imported by mistake?E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1353964459 |
| 2 | 2025-01-25 21:28 | CartoKees ♦57 | Hi,Thank you for noticing. They were imported by mistake. I am gonna correct them. | |
| 161695058 by BENJAMINMontiel @ 2025-01-24 01:49 | 1 | 2025-01-24 09:11 | mueschel | Hi,I found many keys likecorreoelec = telefono = sitio web = Please make sure you use the correct tags for these:emailphonewebsiteIn OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. |
| 161623797 by 오아니 @ 2025-01-22 05:53 | 1 | 2025-01-23 11:03 | mueschel | Hi,it looks like something went very wrong here. All these nodes don't have any common tag.Please also check the OSM Import Guidelines to see how imports of objects need to be done:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 161607477 by Xavizard Knight @ 2025-01-21 16:40 | 1 | 2025-01-22 11:12 | mueschel | Hi,on this traffic sign you introduced 18 new tags that are not used in any other place. A few dozen more are not documented.Please have a look to the Wiki how traffic signs are commonly mapped - usually about 4-6 Tags are completely sufficient to describe a sign.https://www.openstreetmap.or... |
| 2 | 2025-01-22 18:48 | Xavizard Knight ♦12 | Heyas! Thanks for pointing this out.Your comment has made me aware of how weirdly I mapped this sign.I used a JOSM traffic sign preset for tagging this, and it seems I applied the Spanish-style orientation in city sign preset, when this sign is a Catalan-style orientation in city.The ... | |
| 161546812 by wangsaner @ 2025-01-20 03:28 | 1 | 2025-01-21 13:00 | mueschel | Hi,it looks like you're introducing a large number of new tags and relations here. Where can we find the documentation of them? |
| 161532793 by Francisco Gutierres @ 2025-01-19 17:08 | 1 | 2025-01-21 10:49 | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!I see that you added many tags here that are not used in any other place, e.g. habitat 1 habitat 2 habitat 3 sintaxaIn OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.Please use onl... |
| 2 | 2025-01-21 11:28 | Francisco Gutierres ♦1 | Good morning dear Mueschel,Thank you very much for the information. The thing is, some of the options in my presets are not available. For example, for the salt marsh and dunes objects.Is this related to some setting in the OSM editor?Best regards,Francisco Gutierres | |
| 3 | 2025-01-21 11:35 | mueschel | You can always enter tags manually in the "Properties" section using the "+" sign.E.g. for a salt marsh, the wiki names the right tags:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:wetland%3DsaltmarshIf you have question about tagging, the best place to ask is the forums - ma... | |
| 4 | 2025-01-21 12:41 | topolusitania ♦218 | Olá. Para além dos foros oficiais, há um grupo português no Telegram que pode ser util e cuja actividade é diária:https://web.telegram.org/k/#@OSMPortugalCumprimentosTL | |
| 161506714 by Mortein @ 2025-01-18 21:39 | 1 | 2025-01-19 13:33 | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag 'phone:nz' here. 'nz' refers to the country and not a language. Country codes are written in capital letters, so the correct spelling would be 'phone:NZ'. I just fix a couple of them. |
| 2 | 2025-01-19 18:28 | Mortein ♦4 | Oh, my mistake. Thanks for fixing all the others!I'm a little surprised JOSM didn't give me a warning about it. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-19 18:37 | mueschel | Generating a warning would be slightly complicated, because both versions could be correct:phone:ES for a number available only in Spainphone:es for a dedicated number with a Spanish speaking contact | |
| 161486761 by Q-OSM @ 2025-01-18 11:05 | 1 | 2025-01-19 15:23 | mueschel | Hi,please check the fuel tags you added, there are two strange ones that are not used anywhere else:fuel:Gazolefuel:PGLc |
| 2 | 2025-01-25 10:35 | Q-OSM ♦8 | Yes ! Corrected ! | |
| 157222604 by mueschel @ 2024-09-28 18:14 | 1 | 2025-01-13 10:43 | Bierphysik ♦87 | Hi. Ich hätte es gut gefunden, wenn Du vor deiner Anpassung kurz mit mir diskutiert hättest im Changeset indem ich das auf =track gesetzt habe. Kannst Du mir bitte kurz darlegen, wieso hier =path doch angeraten ist. =track sah ich wegen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radver... |
| 2 | 2025-01-13 11:01 | Bierphysik ♦87 | Öhm und ich sehe grade, dass Du das auf motor_vehicle=no gesetzt hast. Das ist nicht richtig! Dort dürfen Anlieger KFZ fahren. Dort stand im Frühjahr ein "Anlieger frei". Da mapillary leider grade nicht will, kann ich da nix raussuchen. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-13 11:03 | mueschel | highway=track ist ein " Wirtschaftsweg, der u. a. hauptsächlich für die Land- oder Forstwirtschaft [...] genutzt wird."Das trifft hier nicht zu: Landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr ist nicht erlaubt, nur auf kurzen Teilstücken Anliegerverkehr. Teile des Weges sind auch mit Poll... | |
| 4 | 2025-01-13 11:05 | mueschel | Mapillary ist nicht aktuell. z.B. fehlen dort auch noch überall die "S-Pedelec frei" Schilder. | |
| 5 | 2025-01-13 11:08 | Bierphysik ♦87 | Die mapillary Bilder sind leider schlecht und die falsche Richtung :( | |
| 6 | 2025-01-13 11:15 | Bierphysik ♦87 | Englisches wiki: The tag highway=track is used for minor land-access roads that are not considered part of the general-purpose road network. Das trifft mE hier zu. Aber ich wählte =track als Kompromiss, da =service mir overkill erschien (ebenso =unclassified).Aber dein motor_vehicle=no stim... | |
| 7 | 2025-01-13 11:18 | mueschel | Ich bin mir sehr sicher, dass auf genau diesem Abschnitt kein Verkehr zugelassen ist.... was die Autofahrer aber nicht davon abhält ihn trotzdem zu benutzen.Ich werde mir das in den nächsten 1-2 Wochen aber nochmal genau vor Ort anschauen. | |
| 8 | 2025-01-13 11:23 | Bierphysik ♦87 | Ich lege mein Hand dafür ins Feuer, dass dort im Frühjahr Anlieger frei Schilder waren, sonst hätte ich das nämlich nicht geändert. Vll wurde das zwischenzeitlich geändert! Dann hast Du mit Deiner Anpassung recht. Ich schaue auch mal, ob ich die Tage dahin komme. | |
| 9 | 2025-01-13 11:31 | Bierphysik ♦87 | Was auch GEGEN ein vollständiges KFZ Verbot spricht ist, dass der Wge die einzige Zufahrt für bspw. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272030141 ist. | |
| 10 | 2025-01-13 18:36 | Bierphysik ♦87 | Ok wir haben beide Recht; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22589656 ist nach Norden so beschildert: https://streetcomplete.app/p/257197.jpg | |
| 11 | 2025-01-13 18:37 | Bierphysik ♦87 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993406966 nach Süden so: https://streetcomplete.app/p/257198.jpg | |
| 12 | 2025-01-13 18:38 | Bierphysik ♦87 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902613366 nach Süden so: https://streetcomplete.app/p/257200.jpg | |
| 13 | 2025-01-13 18:40 | Bierphysik ♦87 | Und - hier hast du jetzt recht - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72581239 nach Süden so: https://streetcomplete.app/p/257201.jpg | |
| 14 | 2025-01-13 18:42 | Bierphysik ♦87 | dh die motor_vehicle-access tags bei den oberen dreien sind motor_vehicle=destination und beim 4. motor_vehicle=no | |
| 15 | 2025-01-13 18:42 | mueschel | So ungefähr hatte ich das auch in Erinnerung. Das nördliche Ende ist an den Pollern an der kleinen Brücke, und das südliche am Abzweig des Feldweges nach Osten. | |
| 16 | 2025-01-13 18:44 | Bierphysik ♦87 | mE beisst sich das =path mit der Befahrbarkeit der durch KFZ/Traktor/etc. - da hier auch landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr fahren darf, hatte ich damals mich für =track entschieden. Das sehe ich noch immer so (für die ersten 3) - wie siehst Du das? | |
| 17 | 2025-01-13 18:52 | mueschel | Ein track ist das für mich in keinem Fall. Den Eintrag im Wiki halte ich für fragwürdig, bzw. nur zutreffend wenn ein größerer Teil des Verkehrs landwirtschaftlich ist. Hier ist aber der Hauptzweck der Radverkehr, der Weg extra dafür angelegt, und landwirtschaftlicher ... | |
| 18 | 2025-01-13 19:07 | Bierphysik ♦87 | service wäre der passende Kompromiss, sozusagen als Verlängerung des Leukertswegs von Nordostost | |
| 19 | 2025-01-14 10:15 | Bierphysik ♦87 | Von Deiner Seite aus okay? | |
| 20 | 2025-01-14 10:40 | mueschel | Ja klar. | |
| 21 | 2025-01-14 12:09 | Bierphysik ♦87 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161341842 | |
| 22 | 2025-01-17 20:04 | mueschel | Hast du auch diese tolle "eingeschränktes Vorfahrt gewähren" gesehen?An der Einmündung des Feldweges von Ostenhttps://osm.janmichel.eu/img/20250117_192255.jpg | |
| 23 | 2025-01-18 14:00 | Bierphysik ♦87 | Jein. Ich hatte es bei der Schnellvisite gesehen, aber "ignoriert" - bin kein Straßenschildmapper, deswegen hatte ich das ad acta gelegt. Oder worauf willst Du hinaus? | |
| 24 | 2025-01-19 09:56 | mueschel | Ich würde den Unsinn als Beleg dafür werten, dass die Beschilderung wie sie im Augenblick ist, nicht so gedacht war und sich eventuell noch ändert. | |
| 25 | 2025-01-20 15:18 | Bierphysik ♦87 | Da bin ich mir nicht so sicher. Dieses Schild, dass Du als unsinnig beschreibst (auf dem Foto), hängt da schon mindestens 2-3 Jahre. | |
| 161493211 by mueschel @ 2025-01-18 14:17 | 1 | 2025-01-19 02:13 | markvwald ♦1 | Hi @mueschel. I've been working on creating a high-detail 3D model of Levi's Stadium. The ways you removed were not duplicates, but rather individual seating sections.Let me know if I've broken the community guidelines somehow. If not, I'm wondering if you can put them back. Th... |
| 2 | 2025-01-19 09:45 | mueschel | Objects with the tags @id and id are always duplicates due to uploading objects that have been exported to geojson files before.Checking again I see that you deleted some of the original objects before. I'm sure I found duplicates yesterday, but now it seems like I was mistaken. I'... | |
| 161277026 by mueschel @ 2025-01-12 15:21 | 1 | 2025-01-18 21:39 | tttnnn24 ♦52 | dank je @mueschelMet een conditional; dat had ik zelf moeten bedenken. Sorry |
| 2 | 2025-01-19 09:37 | mueschel | With so many exceptions it might be even better to not use oneway tags at all and simply use access restrictions:bicycle:backward = yesmofa:backward = yesvehicle:backward = destination | |
| 161455432 by rodolfovargas @ 2025-01-17 13:25 | 1 | 2025-01-18 17:54 | mueschel | Hi,you used some new tags here: "emergency:type" and similar. Did you mean to use "damage:type"? |
| 161398687 by melb_guy @ 2025-01-15 23:05 | 1 | 2025-01-18 13:57 | mueschel | hi,the features you list here using the new "community_support" tags are commonly tagged as "social_facility":https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facilityThe various topics can be added to the social_facility tag using a list of values, separated by semicolons.... |
| 161367208 by moaxed @ 2025-01-15 05:36 | 1 | 2025-01-18 13:49 | mueschel | hi,this church got a strange "RAMKLIPP" tag, could you check that?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37079169 |
| 161420222 by mueschel @ 2025-01-16 13:52 | 1 | 2025-01-16 21:29 | aharvey ♦1,716 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:etymology says "This key is intended for a name or sometimes a word, but not a full etymology tracing the evolution of that word, as one would find in a dictionary."Previously the etymology value was "Lt.William Bradley" but you�... |
| 2 | 2025-01-16 23:00 | mueschel | I'd say that the text is still reasonably short and not like "one would find in a dictionary.".I understand the Wiki as "keep it short, OSM is not the right place to give a full description like on a Wikipedia page". That would also include not circumventing this limitatio... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-17 00:14 | aharvey ♦1,716 | Still I thought name:etymology was meant to only contain the persons name, as it's "intended for a name or sometimes a word", further details could go in `name:etymology:description` or `name:etymology:note`. We could just delete the whole `name:origin` that was there and got moved to... | |
| 4 | 2025-01-17 08:03 | mueschel | :description is already in use for a bit of further information and could be used here.:origin has never been used on another object (that's why I found it and edited)"Just a word or name" seems a bit strict: In many cases that would just be a copy of the name of the object. A s... | |
| 5 | 2025-01-18 06:42 | TheSwavu ♦544 | The requirement that the tag value be a name or just a word was added by one user in Sep 2021 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key%3Aname%3Aetymology&diff=prev&oldid=2200202 with (as far as I can tell) no discussion on the forum or the tagging mail list.As it currently st... | |
| 161318214 by Emilio L @ 2025-01-13 17:14 | 1 | 2025-01-14 14:56 | mueschel | Hi,I see that you added many tags to hotels which are not used in any other place. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are ava... |
| 161081993 by Jordania Moça Linda @ 2025-01-07 04:25 | 1 | 2025-01-10 09:30 | mueschel | Hi,could you check the objects you edited lately? Many of them have a large number of strange tags that look like they shouldn't appear in OSM, e.g. Aldeia = Lourba General Ac = Cars Managed by = Community Postu Admi = Bobonaro Road Acces = National Road Street Add = Rua d... |
| 161170107 by isi17 @ 2025-01-09 13:27 | 1 | 2025-01-10 09:25 | mueschel | Da es bereits ein Tagging-Schema für solche Haltegriffe gibt:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atoilets%3Awheelchair%3Agrab_railsBitte dokumentiert eure neuen Tags, und diskutiert ihre Vor- und Nachteile z.B. im Forum. Es ist immer möglich, neue Tags einzuführen, aber... |
| 160986267 by mueschel @ 2025-01-04 13:42 | 1 | 2025-01-09 17:37 | rskedgell ♦1,467 | Maybe discuss it with a local who actually understands how parking permits work around here first, or at least have the basic courtesy to discuss it?From the wiki for access=permit:"Open only to people who have obtained a permit granting them access, but permit is ordinarily granted. If p... |
| 2 | 2025-01-09 18:07 | mueschel | But that's clearly what is described in the Wiki. I won't get a permit by going to some place, filling a form and paying a fee. I need to be a resident in the area, or need to be invited by one. That's exactly what access=private, private=permit is intended to mean. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-09 18:47 | rskedgell ♦1,467 | No, you'll get a permit by filling in a web form, e.g. https://www.walthamforest.gov.uk/parking-roads-and-travel/parking-permits-and-suspensions/resident-traders-parking-permit | |
| 4 | 2025-01-09 18:50 | mueschel | "must be applied for by a resident" | |
| 5 | 2025-01-09 19:05 | rskedgell ♦1,467 | That's a resident of the CPZ, not of the street. Other permits are available and on the council's website.Whatever the condition is, it certainly isn't the private=residents which you have used. I have no idea what private=permit is supposed to mean, as it isn't documented on... | |
| 6 | 2025-01-09 19:14 | rskedgell ♦1,467 | This was also discussed on OSM Community without reaching any definite conclusion, perhaps continue there?https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/resident-parking-access-permit-gb/106069/3 | |
| 7 | 2025-01-09 20:13 | mueschel | private=permit is documented for street parking and was part of the proposal accepted with 98% approval. "parking:side:private=* is in use as an addition to specify [private] more precisely, e.g. parking:side:private=residents" | |
| 8 | 2025-01-09 20:21 | rskedgell ♦1,467 | Then I suggest that you update the wiki page for private=* to reflect that. Meanwhile, private=residents is still wrong for these streets. Streets which are, incidentally, less than 1km from y home. | |
| 9 | 2025-01-09 20:26 | mueschel | If you are sure that my edit is wrong and against local habits, please feel free to revert it. I'm not insisting, my comments are just to back up my decision with the usage documented in the Wiki. | |
| 22415728 by Eimai @ 2014-05-18 22:15 | 1 | 2025-01-08 19:18 | mueschel | Hi,it's an old changeset, but there are 4 remaining nodes with an early railway:signal tagging scheme. Could you have a look and see if you can update them to the currently used scheme?Example:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2867547653 |
| 21189206 by flohoff @ 2014-03-19 10:09 | 1 | 2025-01-08 18:59 | mueschel | Die Tags an diesem Gebäude existieren seit einer Ewigkeit, aber viele davon sind ausschließlich hier in Verwendung. Sind diese Daten noch aktuell, oder gibt es eine Möglichkeit das auf "normale" Tags umzustellen?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267201439/history |
| 2 | 2025-01-09 08:05 | flohoff ♦2,354 | Das ist unsinn. Da hat jemand vor Jahren sowas man überall an so Gebäuden in GT gepackt. AUch an den Kitas - das macht null sinn.Ich räume da mal auf. Danke für den Hint. Hatte das gar nicht gesehen.Flo | |
| 161101358 by Thorsten De Souza_ReLUT @ 2025-01-07 15:59 | 1 | 2025-01-08 14:47 | mueschel | Hi,please don't add parking tags that apply to different sections of a way with "_1" - these can't be used by any software as long as it's not known in which part of the way which restriction applies.The only viable way is to split the way as necessary, even if this resu... |
| 161080914 by Bendita Moreira @ 2025-01-07 03:02 | 1 | 2025-01-08 11:22 | mueschel | Hi,could you check your additions? I found about 30 objects with strange tags like this one:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148090613Also, there are many with capital letters in tags like 'Yes'. OSM is case sensitive, so these have to be lower case 'yes'. |
| 160218573 by Thingummy @ 2024-12-12 18:11 | 1 | 2024-12-19 13:16 | mueschel | Hi,could you check some POI? I found two that have to nhle ref tags like ref:GB.nhle = 1006823 ref:GB:nhle = 1130186Nodes 9009994520 and 339776433 |
| 2 | 2025-01-07 22:21 | Thingummy ♦11 | Yes, one is for scheduled monument , one is for Listed building. I have added its official name as a listed building, and corrected the opperator tag to Historic England. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-08 08:51 | mueschel | Thanks for the reply!The problem is that the tag with the '.' is not defined and not supported by any software. I suggest to either separate the two thing on separate objects (which might be difficult in this case), or simply add both numbers to the normal "ref:GB:nhle" tag, se... | |
| 161038993 by TDMWIFNB @ 2025-01-05 22:53 | 1 | 2025-01-06 07:16 | eggie ♦40,702 | Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.MVG,EggieNamens de OSM Community |
| 2 | 2025-01-06 18:13 | mueschel | Hi,you added the tag "parking_lane_both = *" to many streets - this doesn't fit to the common scheme of tagging of parking lanes. Could you have a look and fix this?The full documentation ishttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking | |
| 161036946 by LukasGP91 @ 2025-01-05 21:26 | 1 | 2025-01-06 11:18 | mueschel | Hi & welcome to OSM!I see that you used some tags that are not used in other places, especially on this node:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12476340274In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.Pl... |
| 2 | 2025-01-06 17:48 | LukasGP91 ♦1 | Hello,Thank you for pointing this out and for your guidance! I’ve corrected the tags on the node to align with OSM's standards and recommendations. | |
| 161022141 by KS-Brandschutz @ 2025-01-05 14:19 | 1 | 2025-01-06 09:11 | mueschel | Hallo,hier ist wohl einiges schiefgegangen. Alle diese Knoten (und noch ein paar Dutzend mehr) haben 40 fremde Tags, die nicht in OSM auftauchen dürfen. Außerdem fehlt die notwendige Angabe einer Quelle und die nötige Dokumentation eines Imports, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.... |
| 2 | 2025-01-06 09:35 | KS-Brandschutz ♦1 | Hallo, das war keine Absicht, soll ich dann alles wieder löschen | |
| 3 | 2025-01-06 09:55 | KS-Brandschutz ♦1 | Ich hab die Tags gelöscht und die Quelle angegeben | |
| 160996978 by Dennis Jonsson @ 2025-01-04 18:22 | 1 | 2025-01-05 11:36 | mueschel | Hi,you used some tags that are not used in other places:Could you explain what they mean?bålsjönvågdalenVågdalen |
| 2 | 2025-01-05 12:20 | Dennis Jonsson ♦1 | They are names of the village, and lakes where I make trails. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-05 12:31 | mueschel | Thanks for the reply!So, adding this as tags likebålsjön = yes was a mistake then? Or are the cities some kind of operator of the trail? Then it could be tagged as operator = bålsjön | |
| 4 | 2025-01-05 12:59 | Dennis Jonsson ♦1 | My thought was by adding those tags was that other villagers could use them to find my trails on the map and use them aswell. But I could be wrong. | |
| 5 | 2025-01-05 13:07 | mueschel | That's not necessary. The villages are tagged as nodes or areas, so it's always possible to search for snowmobile paths near them, e.g. like thishttps://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1WDC | |
| 160974528 by atiknawaz @ 2025-01-04 06:06 | 1 | 2025-01-05 11:32 | mueschel | Please check this import, all the ways are missing tags. |
| 2 | 2025-01-06 22:39 | IndiaKW2Gf7rTBt5C ♦4 | Do you mean administrative borders between wards, a sub-level administrative areas under city of Purnia? | |
| 160893505 by rudychung @ 2025-01-02 05:39 | 1 | 2025-01-03 11:00 | mueschel | Hi,I found these name tags in your edits:name:zh_pinyinname:zh_zhuyinThese are not used in other places, because the common tags are:name:zh-Latn-pinyinname:zh-BopoCould you have a look and change this? |
| 2 | 2025-01-03 14:14 | rudychung ♦12 | Sure, no problem. I would find a time in these two weeks to make the correction.Thank you for your kindly reminder. ^^ | |
| 3 | 2025-01-03 14:23 | mueschel | Hi,if you like, I can just change the tags, that's not much work. | |
| 4 | 2025-01-03 14:27 | rudychung ♦12 | It would be great. Thank you very much. ^^ | |
| 5 | 2025-01-03 14:34 | mueschel | Done.There are two more nodes with a strange tag I can't fix:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12468292272https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12468292274 | |
| 6 | 2025-01-03 16:25 | rudychung ♦12 | Thanks, mueschel. ^^What is the key of the strange tag? | |
| 7 | 2025-01-03 16:28 | mueschel | 基石 = \t礦物課1097號基石 = \t市11 | |
| 160928339 by felipeeugenio @ 2025-01-02 22:23 | 1 | 2025-01-03 11:27 | mueschel | Hi,you added a couple of tracks with a strange "sud=d" tag. Please have a look. |
| 2 | 2025-01-03 11:53 | felipeeugenio ♦2,347 | Hello. Tanks. Just a typo.Thanks | |
| 160926281 by robbieonsea @ 2025-01-02 21:08 | 1 | 2025-01-03 10:57 | mueschel | Hi,I fixed a couple "postbox:type" tags in the last days. The correct spelling is "post_box:type". Seems like your auto-completion got this wrong. |
| 2 | 2025-01-03 15:53 | robbieonsea ♦82 | Thank you | |
| 99406905 by voschix @ 2021-02-16 21:44 | 1 | 2025-01-02 13:45 | mueschel | Hi,it seems you are the only user of "vertical_sign=no" and "vertical_signs=no" tags. Can these two be replaced bytraffic_sign = no? |
| 2 | 2025-01-04 15:37 | voschix ♦179 | Thank you for reminding me of this possibility. I am discussing the issue of how to tag the missing vertical crossing signs in the forum. | |
| 160859801 by qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq @ 2025-01-01 11:43 | 1 | 2025-01-02 10:31 | mueschel | Could you check this building and the adjacent one? They got two roof color tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347753368 |
| 2 | 2025-01-02 19:56 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | thanks, fixed | |
| 160494442 by mueschel @ 2024-12-22 09:22 | 1 | 2025-01-01 23:18 | JesseFTW ♦153 | Heh, with just two changes so far apart, it would have been nice to put them in separate changesets to avoid a cross-Atlantic bounding box. In any case, thanks for fixing the typo. |
| 2 | 2025-01-02 09:39 | mueschel | That's due to a "feature" in Level0. I didn't manually edit the node in Germany. The editor automatically replaced line breaks in the note=* Tag with spaces, which is a change not visible to the user. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-02 13:57 | JesseFTW ♦153 | Oy. That's a lovely 'feature'. Good to know! | |
| 160826276 by mueschel @ 2024-12-31 10:27 | 1 | 2025-01-01 12:41 | sykul ♦58 | Thanks for the correction. I didn't know language tags go on the value rather than the key. Does that mean we can only choose one language's Wikipedia to link? If so, since this is in the Gaeltacht and describing an Irish-language writer, shouldn't we prefer the 'ga' tag? |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 12:49 | mueschel | You can add the language to the key like you did, if it's necessary to add more than one Wiki link.But: There's no need to link to more than one Wiki entry in OSM - all the 20 different language versions are easily accessible by Wikipedias own directory. Only in rare cases this doesn&#... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-01 16:22 | sykul ♦58 | Thanks. I'll just change it to the Irish language tag then, since that was the preferred language of the subject. | |
| 160787246 by Kovoschiz @ 2024-12-30 11:19 | 1 | 2024-12-31 10:32 | mueschel | Hi,let me suggest an alternative to the new "shoulder:variable" tags using the usual conditional syntax: shoulder:left = yes shoulder:left:conditional = no @ obstructionlanes = 3lanes:conditional = 4 @ obstructionBtw, is "obstruction" really right? Usually the f... |
| 2 | 2025-01-01 05:32 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | 1. I have read somewhere that `*:conditional=` is considered inappropriate as compared to `*:variable=` , because it's not always active even when there are `obstruction` . It will only be in effect when the staff judge it's needed. 2. No, it's only a pilot project to have optional ... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-01 05:38 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | 1. Even if I don't use `*:variable:values=`, `shoulder:variable=` and `lanes:variable=` are more accurate and consistent for "exceptionally in cases like accidents or breakdowns, on occasional traffic peaks (few days of year only, for example start or end of school holidays), road works or... | |
| 4 | 2025-01-01 05:47 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | I would think `*:conditional=* @ (obstruction)` is conceptually better reserved for signs saying you are automatically legally allowed to do something when there are crashes. | |
| 160699831 by RudiLueg @ 2024-12-28 04:03 | 1 | 2024-12-29 10:39 | mueschel | Hi,what does "sport:skilift=green" and "Skilift" mean? Lifts are commonly mapped as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aerialway |
| 160698586 by J T E @ 2024-12-28 01:57 | 1 | 2024-12-29 10:07 | mueschel | Hi,is this a shop that services vacuum pumps and devices or vacuum cleaners? Is this the only thing they do?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11345139385 |
| 2 | 2025-01-04 04:43 | J T E ♦4 | Hi, the signs in the windows etc. all describe it as a vacuum cleaner repair shop. Looking on their Yelp (https://www.yelp.com/biz_photos/oreck-clean-home-center-temecula-2), evidently this is still their primary business, but they do a bunch of other things on the side, incl. selling cleaning chemi... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-04 05:03 | J T E ♦4 | Looking it up I can't tell whether I'm supposed to reference Yelp or not, but to be clear "the signs in the windows etc." is based on what I saw with my own eyes. | |
| 160702393 by f_kia @ 2024-12-28 07:32 | 1 | 2024-12-29 09:58 | mueschel | Hi,please check this node, is it a village or a restaurant? |
| 2 | 2024-12-29 11:14 | f_kia ♦5 | Hello,It is a village and there was a mistake in my edit. I have corrected it.Thank you for awaring me of that | |
| 14248446 by blackadder @ 2012-12-12 12:21 | 1 | 2024-12-28 17:30 | mueschel | Hi,a long time ago, you added the tag "blue_badge_holders=yes". Isn't that tagged disabled=yes nowadays?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20841793/history |
| 126534691 by Micheal Kal @ 2022-09-23 08:18 | 1 | 2024-12-28 16:17 | mueschel | Hi,I found some "time:check_in" and "time:check_out" tags with very strange values like 14:48:00 or 23:50.These don't seem to be typical times for check in or check out in a hotel. Could you clarify what they mean?Thanks! |
| 2 | 2024-12-28 16:39 | Micheal Kal ♦8 | Hi Mueschel,Thank you for reaching out. That is data from a data collection exercise.Check in time starts at 3pmCheck out is by 10am the following day. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-28 16:56 | mueschel | In total there are about 80 nodes with these tags:https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1WhZI don't think they all have the same times? | |
| 4 | 2024-12-28 17:30 | Micheal Kal ♦8 | Kindly check them properly, their times are not the same | |
| 160712434 by mueschel @ 2024-12-28 12:53 | 1 | 2024-12-28 14:52 | GA_Kevin ♦22 | Hi,https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:quiet_hourshttps://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/quiet_hours#overviewThe quiet_hours proposal is only used in 12 places worldwide, this is far from wide use. The sign on the front door specifies sensory, not just quiet, which includes visual and audi... |
| 2 | 2024-12-28 14:59 | mueschel | While it might not be used much, there was some longer discussion about the tag."opening_hours:sensory" is not used anywhere - and following the usual scheme of subkeys for opening_hours, it means that a special sub-part of the shop named "sensory" is open, not that it's... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-28 15:02 | GA_Kevin ♦22 | That makes sense, will keep the quiet_hours tag and use that for future Walmarts. Thanks for the clarification! | |
| 160663673 by Evgeniya_rocketdata @ 2024-12-27 06:57 | 1 | 2024-12-28 12:58 | mueschel | I reverted this changeset. The reason is as usual: Automatic replacement of documented tags with undocumented ones. |
| 2 | 2024-12-30 06:29 | Evgeniya_rocketdata ♦14 | Hello! Thank you for your comment. We've figured out what the problem is, we won't fix it anymore. | |
| 160696942 by GA_Kevin @ 2024-12-27 23:50 | 1 | 2024-12-28 12:51 | mueschel | Hi,"incoming" and "outcoming" are not commonly used on letter boxes and parcel lockers. It would be good if you could separate the node into three POI, amenity=letter_box, amenity=post_box and amenity=parcel_locker. The number of slots can be given using 'capacity' ... |
| 2 | 2024-12-28 14:33 | GA_Kevin ♦22 | Hi, yes I looked up this debate, seems it flairs up every few years on the forums. There is no standard for this type of mail center. It is a single object with incoming, outgoing, and parcel lockers, so to me even if the tags are sparsely used it makes sense to tag them as such. These are not 3 sep... | |
| 160651237 by pumasocat @ 2024-12-26 19:48 | 1 | 2024-12-28 09:43 | mueschel | Hi,you used the new tags running_lanebicycle_lanehere. What are these? A running and cycling track? These could be tagged as leisure=track |
| 2 | 2024-12-28 11:37 | pumasocat ♦1 | Hi, even if they're separated by separate color? They are parallel, but one is specific for running, and the other one is specific for bicycles. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-28 12:09 | mueschel | Yes, this should work. I suggest:leisure=tracksport = running;cyclingsegregated = yesfoot:lanes = yes|nobicycle:lanes = no|yessurface:colour:lanes = blue|red(the order of the lanes and colors need be adjusted, I couldn't find recent images) | |
| 160696165 by Cartografias VPRs @ 2024-12-27 23:11 | 1 | 2024-12-28 09:47 | mueschel | Hi,please check the areas you uploaded - there are 14 ways without any proper tag. |
| 160424070 by Infra-Simon @ 2024-12-20 09:06 | 1 | 2024-12-24 10:00 | mueschel | Hallo,was bedeutet "emergency:right=yes"? Dieses Tag gibt es sonst nirgends. |
| 2 | 2024-12-27 09:00 | Infra-Simon ♦2 | Weil rechts ein Schild für Einsatzfahrzeuge frei steht. Kann aber auch entfernt werden. Habe keinen anderen Tag gefunden | |
| 3 | 2024-12-27 09:14 | mueschel | Ok, aber das Schild alleine ergibt keinen Sinn - es kann ja nur etwas freigegeben werden wenn auch etwas verboten ist. Ist es die Durchfahrt für alle anderen? | |
| 4 | 2024-12-27 10:03 | Infra-Simon ♦2 | Durchfahrt ist für alle. Es gibt ein absolutes Halteverbot auf dem Seitenstreifen mit dem Zusatz "Einsatzfahrzeuge frei" | |
| 5 | 2024-12-27 10:08 | mueschel | Ah, das wäre dannparking:right:restriction:emergency = none | |
| 6 | 2024-12-27 10:23 | Infra-Simon ♦2 | Ah okay, danke für die Info | |
| 160585792 by jb54osm @ 2024-12-24 19:20 | 1 | 2024-12-25 13:56 | mueschel | Hi,the tag "recycling:gft" is not used in other places - what can be recycled here? |
| 2 | 2024-12-25 14:38 | jb54osm ♦177 | Hi,GFT-waste is a common term in The Netherlands. It stands forGroente (vegetables)Fruit (fruit)Tuin (garden).Another term you might encounter is PMD:Plastic (plastic packaging)Metaal (small metal stuff)Drinkpakken (drink cartons (juice, milk etc)). | |
| 3 | 2024-12-25 14:42 | mueschel | recycling:pmd is defined in the Wiki.GFT is covered by recycling:green_waste: "All green garden waste and also vegetables and fruit from our own consumption" | |
| 4 | 2024-12-25 14:47 | jb54osm ♦177 | Aha, I'll change the GFT to green_waste in the Prinsenhof area (the area where I did updates). | |
| 158094240 by mueschel @ 2024-10-19 14:42 | 1 | 2024-12-22 13:52 | KoiAndBlueBird ♦32 | Ich finde nicht, dass gesperrte Wege als disused: eingetragen werden sollten, sondern als access=restricted/no. Die Wege an sich sind ja noch in Benutzung von z.B. Naturschützern. |
| 2 | 2024-12-22 14:16 | mueschel | Ich habe hier nur einen Tippfehler korrigiert, das Prefix stammt von einem anderen User. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-04 16:50 | KoiAndBlueBird ♦32 | Okay, ich habe es jetzt mal als access=no eingetragen. | |
| 160284795 by Andrew Chadwick @ 2024-12-14 16:20 | 1 | 2024-12-22 09:39 | mueschel | Could you check this way, it got a strange 'test_width' tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1342696988 |
| 2 | 2024-12-23 15:59 | Andrew Chadwick ♦56 | Fixed. I typoed "est_width" on the phone keyboard. | |
| 160245395 by Christian Heitmann @ 2024-12-13 13:01 | 1 | 2024-12-22 09:18 | mueschel | Hallo,was heißt denn "share trail"? Dieses Tag wird sonst nirgends verwendet. Die Tatsache, dass Fußgänger und Radfahrer den Weg benutzen dürfen ist schon mit foot/bicycle=yes ausreichend erfasst. |
| 2 | 2025-01-07 08:22 | Christian Heitmann ♦1 | Hey mueschel,das gebe ich dir recht, foot/bicycle deckt es schon ab und somit ist es doppelt gemoppelt. Vllt habe ich das übersehen bzw. werden so oder so verschieden Tags verwendet. | |
| 159904943 by k127 @ 2024-12-04 05:47 | 1 | 2024-12-07 12:25 | mueschel | Hi,you used new tags like "recycling:container:silver" here. Could you check if it's possible to add common tags for materials that can be disposed of here instead of colors?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=recycling#Recycling |
| 2 | 2024-12-17 16:44 | k127 ♦95 | Hi mueschel, my intention with these tags is to map the count of the recycling and waste containers for each collection location in a way more easy to determine from aerial imagery. Feel free to supplement the common tags for recycling substances. I'd kindly ask you to keep the tags I added, th... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-17 17:40 | mueschel | If your intend is to map the colors of the containers, you should use a simple 'colour' tag. If your intend is to map what and how can be recycled, then the colors are not useful for anybody outside this particular town, because colors vary a lot between places. | |
| 160234969 by vicmap_import @ 2024-12-13 08:03 | 1 | 2024-12-14 10:26 | mueschel | Hi,you used keys like "addr:flats10" in this import. Adding a number directly after the key is uncommon - it's much more usual to add it after a colon like addr:flats:10. Could you check & change that? |
| 2 | 2024-12-14 12:12 | aharvey ♦1,716 | I raised this question at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:addr:flats#Exceeding_255_characters previously. Is there anything you can point me to that indicates the :2 :3 etc. key suffix is in use already for overflowing tag values?On another note, thinking about this more, perhaps th... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-14 12:22 | aharvey ♦1,716 | I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12419076028 as one feature imported with addr:flats10. Could we move this discussion to the community forum or a GitLab issue at https://gitlab.com/alantgeo/vicmap2osm/-/blob/master/README.md or the import page talk, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk... | |
| 4 | 2024-12-14 12:32 | mueschel | Here's the wiki entry about long values in general:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multiple_values#Numbered_suffix_in_keyYou can always check Taginfo for specific tag:https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr:flats#similarIf you check e.g. addr:flats:1 you see that is in use sin... | |
| 5 | 2024-12-14 22:21 | TheSwavu ♦544 | Hi mueschel,Would you please move this discussion the the OSM Community forum. Either https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/122863 or the original discussion https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/122628 Thanks. | |
| 6 | 2024-12-14 22:25 | TheSwavu ♦544 | Or if you want to go old school there is the talk-au mail list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2021-May/014622.html | |
| 7 | 2024-12-17 22:44 | aharvey ♦1,716 | discussion moved to https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vicmap-address-import-progress/122863/4 | |
| 160096497 by Brickblock1 @ 2024-12-09 15:19 | 1 | 2024-12-13 09:26 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this platform, its gtfs keys don't seem to be right, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1336560061 |
| 2 | 2024-12-13 10:15 | Brickblock1 ♦6 | Nice catch I'll fix it when I get home. | |
| 160111285 by xrt @ 2024-12-10 00:20 | 1 | 2024-12-13 09:17 | mueschel | Hi,you wrote"amenity=kick-scooter_parking refusé par signalement Osmose".That is a documented tag that is in use hundreds of times. The tagging was correct and the error must be on the side of Osmose. |
| 160098090 by Thomaso58 @ 2024-12-09 16:07 | 1 | 2024-12-12 09:17 | mueschel | Hallo,schau mal nach dieser Haltestelle:Die hat ein uic_number, die aussieht wie die uic_ref, und eine ungewöhnliche uic_ref.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6772936834 |
| 160067705 by detective-fiasco @ 2024-12-08 19:22 | 1 | 2024-12-11 11:06 | mueschel | Hi,please check this signal, it got a strange 'rht = normal' tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12405397079 |
| 160125906 by AzranAzwer @ 2024-12-10 11:39 | 1 | 2024-12-11 11:00 | mueschel | Please check this import. There are 212 ways without any proper tag.Also, important documentation according to our import guidelines is missing.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 2 | 2025-02-21 22:09 | JosephAbboud ♦1 | Hello. Please double check this edit you made. You seem to have deleted one of the towers when importing data. Emirates Tower One no longer exists on the map, and was deleted in this edit. Please see the linked discussion entry:https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/someone-removed-one-of-the-t... | |
| 159993472 by isi17 @ 2024-12-06 13:01 | 1 | 2024-12-07 11:58 | mueschel | Hi,I found a variety of "grab_bars" tags:toilets:grab_bars:lefttoilets:grab_bars:righttoilets:grab_bar:righttoilets:grab_bars:rigthtoilets:grab_bar:lefttoilets:grab_bars_rightThe common and documented tag for this ist "toilets:wheelchair:grab_rails":https://... |
| 2 | 2024-12-11 09:57 | isi17 ♦6 | Hi,we must have overlooked this tag before coming up with the grab_bars tag. We wanted to have a transparent tagging system for grab bars including information left, right, foldable and fixed for wheelmap.org. (toilets:grab_bars:left=yestoilets:grab_bars:left=notoilets:grab_bars:right=yestoi... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-11 10:49 | mueschel | The best way is to support the already existing tag "toilets:wheelchair:grab_rails". | |
| 160027040 by PèreForez @ 2024-12-07 13:30 | 1 | 2024-12-10 14:16 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this monument? It seems the 'name' tag is actually a 'description' and 'sculpture:name' should be 'name'. Unfortunately I can't find information using the memorialgenweb reference number. |
| 2 | 2024-12-10 14:59 | PèreForez ♦14 | Bonjour mueschel, Merci de votre remarque : j'ai fait effectivement une erreur dans l'attribution du numéro de référence dans MémorialGenWeb, par confusion avec celui de l'autre monument aux morts de ce même cimetière , je viens de le rectifi... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-10 15:52 | mueschel | Now I found it. I'm still not sure about the name - there is no name given. Could you verify that the two name tags are really the actual name the monument is known by and not just describing it? | |
| 159989249 by Infra-Simon @ 2024-12-06 11:00 | 1 | 2024-12-07 17:55 | mueschel | Diese Straße hat eine Menge parking:restriction Tags, die sich teilweise widersprechen. Was gilt denn genau? Hast du ein Foto des Schildes? |
| 2 | 2024-12-09 10:24 | Infra-Simon ♦2 | In dieser Way ID, wie in vielen anderen in der Innenstadt gibt es viele verschiedene Restrictions. Deshalb habe ich die Way ID nach Vorgabe des Wiki-Beitrags "https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multiple_values" getaggt. Damit ist es möglich, mehrere Values innerhalb einer Way-ID zu t... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-09 13:00 | mueschel | Ich weiß nicht, wer diesen Eintrag im Wiki gemacht hat, aber das stimmt nicht. Tags mit _1 gibt es (abgesehen von einigen uralten Imports) nicht, und wird von den meisten Anwendungen nicht unterstützt. Bei Straßen-Tags wie parking oder sidewalk wüsste ich kein Beispiel, wo das ... | |
| 160054540 by mueschel @ 2024-12-08 12:14 | 1 | 2024-12-09 09:36 | joost schouppe ♦1,174 | Hey Mueschel,Could you join the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/detention-centres-for-rejected-asylum-seekers/122453/16 instead of just changing the way I mapped these. I'd prefer you'd have contacted me about this. I just mapped this a few days ago, and I'm open... |
| 2 | 2024-12-09 10:13 | mueschel | I only changed a new tag to one that is already in use and follows the common scheme of using a *:for suffix to tag the designated users of an amenity. It's impossible to check the whole forum for completely unrelated thread titles for every change I make. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-09 10:40 | joost schouppe ♦1,174 | That's not what I meant to say.Two things:As a general remark: if you want to change tags according to something that's not in the wiki, then at the very least notify the mappers whose work you edit. And if at all possible, leave a remark on the wiki Discussion page mentioning that you... | |
| 159912547 by berggnom @ 2024-12-04 10:15 | 1 | 2024-12-08 11:29 | mueschel | Hi,you used many tags here that are not in use in any other place.Could you check if they are actually needed and there is no common tag to replace them? capacity:hut = 24 capacity:shelter = 24 cuisine = non_catered half_board = yes hut:chief = Hobi Daniel hut:guardian = Zwyer... |
| 2 | 2024-12-08 15:31 | berggnom ♦1 | Hi,Good to hear from you. In fact I was looking up tags for some hours and didnt find anything that matched, as these are very specific. I also asked gpt and among its suggestions there were also no common ones. Would you have some suggestions? The plan is to update 303 alpine huts periodically vi... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-08 15:45 | mueschel | I'd offer my help, but I have no idea what the tags mean. What's the difference between hut/shelter, what's a chief/guardian if not the local people operating the hut, and what is 'non_catered'? | |
| 4 | 2024-12-09 08:01 | berggnom ♦1 | As long as the hut is opened, it is serviced by the hut guardian (hut warden). If it is closed, e.g. during the winter months, only the shelter is opened to visitors. Therefore the hut and shelter capacity can differ, e.g. there might only be part of the hut open in winter. The hut chief is the pers... | |
| 5 | 2024-12-09 08:10 | mueschel | For the "shelter" there is already the tag "winter_room" and "capacity:winter_room".The capacity of the hut can be given simply as "capacity".Tagging chief/guardian/operator at the same time seems a bit difficult. There is "contact:person" tha... | |
| 6 | 2024-12-09 08:35 | berggnom ♦1 | Thanks alot! I will adopt this for future changes | |
| 133681772 by mueschel @ 2023-03-14 19:23 | 1 | 2024-12-08 22:03 | LorenzoPesci ♦64 | sembra una fattoria piuttosto che una stazione di servizio |
| 2 | 2024-12-08 23:04 | mueschel | That's possible - I don't have further kmowledge. All I did was changing the uppercase tags to the correct spelling. | |
| 159985566 by Evgeniya_rocketdata @ 2024-12-06 09:04 | 1 | 2024-12-07 18:01 | mueschel | Would you please once and for all stop reverting my edits? The tags you add again and again are not documented and not used by anybody else. |
| 2 | 2024-12-09 09:00 | Evgeniya_rocketdata ♦14 | Hello! Thanks for your edits, we understand everything. We won't do it anymore. | |
| 159843353 by Dickson Kariuki @ 2024-12-02 13:31 | 1 | 2024-12-07 11:44 | mueschel | Hi,you added nodes with a " garbage_type = waste_transfer_station" tag. The common tag for this is amenity = waste_transfer_stationCould you check & fix this? |
| 159907981 by mueschel @ 2024-12-04 08:05 | 1 | 2024-12-05 15:25 | Pink Duck ♦151 | Weird how auto-correct is contact:x to contact:twitter, the old name, the auto-redirected domain, that is falling out of common use, and near totally in media broadcasts. |
| 2 | 2024-12-05 15:29 | mueschel | The name of the tag has nothing to do with any website or name of a service.It's just a well-defined and documented token that is used to link to some online platform. Note how the value is just the user name, and not a full link to any web page. This makes it completely independent from the ... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-05 15:41 | Pink Duck ♦151 | There is that benefit I guess, but I just wish all the websites would update their logos and links for efficiency of user agent look-up. So long as the data is there all is good in some discoverable form, just as I've gotten used to sidewalk/soccer terms. | |
| 159858802 by ASRvwde @ 2024-12-02 20:51 | 1 | 2024-12-03 15:07 | mueschel | Hallo,bitte schau nochmal nach den destination-Tags: "destination:to:symbol:backward" -> "destination:symbol:to:backward"Das :to kommt immer nach dem Subtag und vor der Richtung. |
| 2 | 2024-12-03 21:12 | ASRvwde ♦4 | Moin.Ist das ganze denn auch irgendwo brauchbar (am verbindlich) dokumentiert? Im Wiki in DE:Key:destination kann man sich das sicherlich aus den Beispielen irgendwie zusammen puzzlen. Aber welcher (sub)tag vor oder nach welchem stehen MUSS, steht da nicht drin.Da kann man sich zwar noch dur... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-03 21:49 | mueschel | Du hast Recht, die Dokumentation ist noch verbesserungswürdig.Hier hatte ich die ganzen verwendeten Tags selbst zusammengestellt:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging#Available_Tags | |
| 4 | 2024-12-03 21:54 | ASRvwde ♦4 | Moin.Den Beitrag habe ich schon gefunden und der ist auch echt hilfreich; aber auch diese Informationen sollten sich am besten direkt im Key finden.Aber erst mal egal. Ich bastel mir aus den "gesammelten Werken" jetzt erst mal ein eigenes Handbuch, damit Du in Zukunft nicht mehr so... | |
| 159833061 by _EdOnGIS_ @ 2024-12-02 08:42 | 1 | 2024-12-03 15:03 | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong here. All these nodes don't have any valid tag.Could you check this? |
| 2 | 2024-12-03 15:06 | _EdOnGIS_ ♦1 | yeah sure. | |
| 159511885 by *Martin* @ 2024-11-23 19:22 | 1 | 2024-11-29 09:26 | mueschel | Hi,what does "alt_length" mean? Two contradicting sources? If so, I think that should be added as 'fixme', but not in an 'alt_' tag. |
| 2 | 2024-12-02 07:19 | *Martin* ♦641 | alt_lenght represents different method of cave length measurement. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-02 07:36 | mueschel | "alt_" seems a bit too generic to represent this. Do these methods have a name or common abbreviation?"length:xxx" might be a good way to tag the methods, just like we distinguish different types of reference numbers using "ref:xxx" | |
| 4 | 2024-12-02 07:50 | *Martin* ♦641 | Methods are unknown to me. It is like 2 different authors provided 2 different lengths. | |
| 159545328 by Kamion @ 2024-11-24 18:43 | 1 | 2024-11-29 09:55 | mueschel | Hi,you added the tag "lhv" on several ways here. Are you sure that is correct? It seems this a local speciality of UK law and not used in the rest of Europe. |
| 2 | 2024-12-01 17:48 | Kamion ♦8 | In OSM restrictions I can not find better tag for this sign:https://pomocnik.meblosignalizacija.si/images/prepovedan-promet-za-motorna-vozila-s-priklopnim-vozilom-2209-144.pngDo you have an alternative tag suggestion?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Restrictions | |
| 3 | 2024-12-01 20:52 | mueschel | That looks like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv_articulated | |
| 4 | 2024-12-02 09:06 | Kamion ♦8 | Ok, will change | |
| 159699372 by skorpion62 @ 2024-11-28 12:24 | 1 | 2024-12-01 18:22 | mueschel | Brauchen wir einen Kammerjäger in der Bäckerei? Wegen "snake = yes" |
| 2 | 2024-12-02 08:57 | skorpion62 ♦73 | Hallo mueschel,Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe meinen Schreibfehler korrigiert.Es sollte snack heißen.Viele Grüße skorpion62 | |
| 159697158 by Fernando Parodi @ 2024-11-28 11:25 | 1 | 2024-11-30 11:30 | mueschel | Please check these edits. You added thousands of neighborhoods named "PMRR". |
| 2 | 2024-11-30 14:09 | Fernando Parodi ♦2 | I'm trying to fix it. I would like do remove this changeset. | |
| 3 | 2024-11-30 14:24 | mueschel | I can revert it, if you like.For simple changesets like this, the "reverter" plugin in JOSM is the fastest option. | |
| 4 | 2024-11-30 15:20 | Fernando Parodi ♦2 | Please, do it. I've tried to erase with the assistance of JOSM, but I've failed.Sorry for the annoyance. | |
| 5 | 2024-11-30 15:30 | mueschel | No problem - all done.Enjoy mapping! | |
| 158487221 by Angry_Tau @ 2024-10-29 08:43 | 1 | 2024-11-30 10:04 | mueschel | Hi,there are several hundred objects with tags like ADD_COMMENTS = 0or duplicating the name tag. I guess these were imported by mistake and can be removed? |
| 2 | 2024-12-03 21:47 | Angry_Tau ♦2 | Hi!Yes, they can be safely removed. These are comments on the WC GIS address node dataset originally created by the county mappers; when not empty, they often contain the name of the business/park/facility. My procedure has been to remove them just before upload, as once in a while they can he... | |
| 159547959 by dromedar61 @ 2024-11-24 20:04 | 1 | 2024-11-29 09:33 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this area, something went wrong with its name tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337560777 |
| 2 | 2024-11-29 10:32 | dromedar61 ♦25 | Oh, thanks for information. I will care about it! | |
| 159513951 by ASRvwde @ 2024-11-23 20:48 | 1 | 2024-11-28 14:04 | mueschel | Hi,bitte schau nochmal nach den destination-Tags die du hinzufügst. Die Reihenfolge der Tag-Bestandteile stimmt nicht:destination:backward:ref -> destination:ref:backwarddestination:backward:ref:to -> destination:ref:to:backwardDie Richtung wird immer am Schluss angegeben.... |
| 2 | 2024-11-29 09:05 | ASRvwde ♦4 | Moin.Danke für den Hinweis. Und? Haste es korrigiert? Nein? Verlässt Dich drauf, dass ich das mache? Dass mir nicht zwischenzeitlich ein Stein auf den Kopf gefallen ist, ich Geschichte bin und der Fehler ewig und drei Tage drin stehen bleibt? Interessant. :) | |
| 3 | 2024-11-29 09:10 | mueschel | Wenn du nachsiehst wirst du feststellen, dass ich bereits eine größere Menge korrigiert habe, den Rest überlasse ich gerne dir. | |
| 4 | 2024-11-29 09:14 | ASRvwde ♦4 | Na dann hoffen wir doch mal, dass mir nicht zwischenzeitlich ein Stein auf den Kopf fällt :) | |
| 159401220 by Langlaeufer @ 2024-11-21 09:45 | 1 | 2024-11-26 14:17 | mueschel | Hallo,ich verstehe die Tags hier nicht.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23729600note passt nicht zu traffic_sign und beide passen nicht zu oneway:bicycle.Was genau ist dort auf welchem Abschnitt beschildert? |
| 2 | 2024-11-26 14:56 | Langlaeufer ♦1,310 | Das ganze ist erstmal siehe traffic_sign eine Fußgängerzone (highway=pedestrian foot=designated) mit Lieferverkehr frei (access=delivery) und Zufahrt in die Grundstücke frei (vehicle=delivery) und Radverkehr frei( hab ich im Verkehrszeichen wohl vergessen). Zudem ist die Einfahrt am ... | |
| 3 | 2024-11-26 14:59 | Langlaeufer ♦1,310 | Vom Einfahrt/Ausfahrt verboten ist der Radverkehr auch ausgenommen, daher oneway:bicycle=no. Wenn man es für wichtig erachtet könnte man statt oneway natürlich zwei restriction-relations (no_exit/no_entry except=bicycle) an die beiden Enden der Straße setzten. | |
| 4 | 2024-11-26 15:01 | Langlaeufer ♦1,310 | access habe ich genommen, weil sich Lieferververkehr auf alle Verkehrsarten bezieht - theoretisch also auch auf Reiter. vehicle habe ich genommen weil hier von Zufahrt (also von Fahrzeugen) die Rede ist. | |
| 5 | 2024-11-28 19:01 | mueschel | Danke für die Details.Ich wäre sehr dafür, dass in Abbiegeverbote bzw. ein sehr kurzes Stück Einbahnstraße am Ende zu ersetzen. Ich schaue mir das am Wochenende mal an. | |
| 6 | 2024-11-28 19:51 | Langlaeufer ♦1,310 | Hab Einfahrt/Ausfahrt abgetrennthttps://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159717599 | |
| 159552549 by j0hn33y @ 2024-11-24 23:03 | 1 | 2024-11-26 09:31 | mueschel | Hi,please check the buildings - they all have a strange "loc_rec" tag that looks like a mistake. |
| 2 | 2024-11-26 14:58 | j0hn33y ♦11 | loc_rec is a typo of loc_ref I am using in my workflow for the township. Updated the tag. | |
| 159554339 by crestrepo @ 2024-11-25 01:22 | 1 | 2024-11-26 09:30 | mueschel | Hi,please check the imported trees. They have some strange tags that look like they shouldn't be in OSM, e.g.:object_cit = Medellinrelation_s = Volador |
| 159554035 by se_bras @ 2024-11-25 00:55 | 1 | 2024-11-26 09:30 | mueschel | Hi,please check the imported trees. They have some strange tags that look like they shouldn't be in OSM, e.g.:object_cit = Medellinrelation_s = Volador |
| 159513263 by Odiz @ 2024-11-23 20:18 | 1 | 2024-11-24 09:43 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this stream? It has a name and an ELVIS tag, but they don't match:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337242856 |
| 2 | 2024-11-24 13:15 | Odiz ♦10 | I don't know which is right...Will leave that one for future generations | |
| 159262795 by DeFra85 @ 2024-11-17 23:18 | 1 | 2024-11-23 14:45 | mueschel | Hi,schau bitte mal nach diesem Wegweiser, der hat ein "abs" Tag anstelle eines direction_*https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12349578553 |
| 2 | 2024-11-23 17:12 | DeFra85 ♦232 | Oh mist, ist beim neuordnen der directions als "Parkplatz" genutzt worden. Werde ich löschen. Danke | |
| 159294987 by JohnRobertson94 @ 2024-11-18 18:33 | 1 | 2024-11-23 11:56 | mueschel | Could you please check this import? All these ways seem to already exist as boundaries of the National Forest - but yours are shifted by some dozen meters.Are you sure the boundaries for the Forest and River areas are not identical? |
| 159203042 by SekeRob @ 2024-11-16 11:03 | 1 | 2024-11-22 11:01 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this area, it's missing its tags.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334487629 |
| 2 | 2024-11-22 12:07 | SekeRob ♦1,433 | Will do. | |
| 159113523 by RainbowWave @ 2024-11-14 02:52 | 1 | 2024-11-16 14:13 | mueschel | Hi,you're using the tag "step_contrast" here. The documented spelling of this tag is "step:contrast":https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Astep%3AcontrastCould you change that? |
| 2 | 2024-11-16 17:09 | RainbowWave ♦1 | Sure, thanks for the heads-up. It should be easy to fix in my next edit. | |
| 158945978 by D R Syfydrin @ 2024-11-09 19:06 | 1 | 2024-11-16 11:29 | mueschel | Hi,please check this farm, something went wrong with the name tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1332468902 |
| 2 | 2024-11-16 12:25 | D R Syfydrin ♦33 | Thank you mueschel! Corrected | |
| 158855252 by mueschel @ 2024-11-07 13:04 | 1 | 2024-11-14 10:26 | joost schouppe ♦1,174 | thanks for the fix. Why did you delete the website though? Yes, it would have been better under contact:facebook than website |
| 2 | 2024-11-14 11:25 | mueschel | That's what I did: move it to contact:facebook. But I used the short version with just the user name and not the full URL. | |
| 3 | 2024-11-14 13:43 | joost schouppe ♦1,174 | Oh, my bad! I overlooked that part | |
| 159006935 by reigi @ 2024-11-11 12:37 | 1 | 2024-11-12 09:28 | mueschel | Hallo,hier ist etwas schiefgegangen. All diese Wege haben ausschließlich fremde Tags die nicht in OSM sein sollten. Können diese Wege einfach wieder gelöscht werden? |
| 2 | 2024-11-13 13:27 | reigi ♦65 | Hallo Mueschel, danke für den Hinweis. Ich schließe natürlich nicht aus, dass mir bei der Bearbeitung einer so langen Relation der ein oder andere Fehler unterlaufen ist, die ich selbstverständlich behebe. Bei einer groben Durchsicht sind mir aber keine Fehler aufgefallen. Kanns... | |
| 3 | 2024-11-13 18:31 | mueschel | Ich meine alle 64 Wege die in diesem Changeset hochgeladen worden sind. | |
| 4 | 2024-11-14 08:01 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Hallo! Z.B. siehe Weg http://www.osm.org/way/1332851632BEGINN = 2019-08-15T08:01:17ZKAT = 1010LAND = NWMODELLART = TFISNAM = Europäischer Fernwanderweg E8OBJART = TF91101OBJART_TXT = TF_WanderwegOBJID = DENWAT511T0005kdOID = DENWAT511T000p3X_DENWAT511T000ZUTSCL = 05500000895... | |
| 5 | 2024-11-14 08:27 | reigi ♦65 | Danke für eure Hinweise. Das sind Daten, die aus TFIS NRW (Touristik- und Freizeit-Informationssystem des Landes NRW) stammen. Wie die da reingeraten sind, ist mir (noch) ein Rätsel. Da werde ich mich kurzfristig drum kümmern. | |
| 158983422 by syntex @ 2024-11-10 19:51 | 1 | 2024-11-13 11:26 | mueschel | Hi,this relation got some strange tags likewhphotypekkp sdescWhere these added by mistake? |
| 2 | 2024-11-13 16:29 | syntex ♦828 | Unfortuantely yes. Fixed that. | |
| 158880481 by cbbeep @ 2024-11-08 04:23 | 1 | 2024-11-10 10:09 | mueschel | Hi,you introduced the new tag ref:AU.gov.vic.colac-otway.bridgenoThis scheme doesn't match the others for such reference numbers.Currently in use are these:https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=ref%3AAU-#keysMaybe this is the better one?ref:AU-VIC.colac-otway.bridge |
| 2 | 2024-11-11 08:52 | cbbeep ♦1 | Thanks I've updated these and will use ref:AU-VIC.colac-otway.bridge | |
| 135059213 by mueschel @ 2023-04-18 13:07 | 1 | 2024-11-09 20:14 | redd ♦386 | Hallo mueschel,was spricht von deiner Seite aus gegen skatepark=flatbar/funbox/halfpipe?So ähnlich wird auch auch bei playground und fitness_station vorgegangen. |
| 2 | 2024-11-10 08:57 | mueschel | Dagegen spricht die Einheitlichkeit von Tags. Als ich das vor eineinhalb Jahren editiert habe, gab es skatepark=* noch überhaupt nicht, nur ein paar Dutzend skatepark:*=yes.Die Form mit Doppelpunkt entspricht auch dem 2019 geschriebenen Proposal für Skateparks. | |
| 158523576 by omalabo @ 2024-10-30 03:14 | 1 | 2024-10-30 05:13 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi omalabo, thank you for your contributions.Why did you capitalise each name? |
| 2 | 2024-10-30 05:24 | omalabo ♦2 | Hi, how are you? This is how it appears in shapefile source. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-30 05:28 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Which shapefile do you mean exactly? Was the data not collected by yourself or is it a data import? | |
| 4 | 2024-10-30 05:35 | omalabo ♦2 | my data on the departments is collected then put in shapefile format then I import them through the oauth api | |
| 5 | 2024-10-30 07:54 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Please state the data source. Where did you get the department information from and what license is that data published under? | |
| 6 | 2024-11-09 12:03 | mueschel | Hi,these new boundaries don't align with the already existing ones. The old ones seem to be more accurate and align with natural features like the Niger river and city boundaries. | |
| 7 | 2024-11-10 19:13 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 158982060, 158982058, 158982055, 158982063 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and problematic import, see discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158523576 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158533... | |
| 158603032 by MatthewAJackson @ 2024-11-01 01:38 | 1 | 2024-11-02 09:50 | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong here. All these nodes have a huge number of foreign tags that should not be in the OSM database.And: Where can we find the mandatory documentation of this import?E.g.ARC_Zone = 90034Addrees = 3601 OVERLAND AVEAddress_X = 3601 Overland AveBatch = 4/16/2018C... |
| 2 | 2024-11-03 06:56 | AragonChristopherR17Z ♦5 | Adding another note. Bicycle parking does not generally need addresses; but if they are added, as they are here, they should be tagged with the standard address tags. For those who don't know, "CD" refers to council district; this tag is unnecessary as: 1, CD boundaries change; and 2,... | |
| 3 | 2024-11-03 06:59 | AragonChristopherR17Z ♦5 | Forgot to mention: the "RackColor" tag should be replaced with the standardized tag "colour" | |
| 4 | 2024-11-03 09:30 | mueschel | Checking the data further, I see most of these nodes inside buildings or on driveways. I'd say the accuracy of coordinates is at least questionable. In sum, I suggest to revert this import. | |
| 5 | 2024-11-04 02:27 | Allison P ♦1,136 | The only useful tags here are RackID and RackColor, and color will require standardization. If, on top of that, the coordinates aren't accurate, the dataset is of little utility. | |
| 6 | 2024-11-08 09:13 | mueschel | It seems that there is no response from Matthew. If there are no objections, I'll try to do a revert tomorrow. | |
| 7 | 2025-02-25 03:16 | MatthewAJackson ♦1 | Hello everyone, I would like to apologize to all of you. First, I made this account years ago when I was a child and used my spam email so I didn't check to see this comment section until I noticed the data was gone and wanted to investigate. I learned a bit of JOSM and started adding bike ... | |
| 158617446 by Evgeniya_rocketdata @ 2024-11-01 12:53 | 1 | 2024-11-03 15:00 | mueschel | Once again. Stop reverting fixes of tags by other mappers. |
| 2 | 2024-11-04 06:59 | Evgeniya_rocketdata ♦14 | Hello! We're sorry. I suppose it's the phone number? | |
| 3 | 2024-11-05 13:53 | mueschel | The phone number is fine as it is. But there are plenty other contact tags that you keep changing. Just check the history of any of the nodes:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10943688612/history | |
| 4 | 2024-11-05 14:18 | Evgeniya_rocketdata ♦14 | You're right. But their phone number is really the one that we specified https://i.imgur.com/ChhGCS1.png . We will not change social networks (facebook/instagram) anymore. Do you think we can get the phone numbers back? | |
| 5 | 2024-11-05 14:31 | mueschel | I can't do cherry picking the correct and incorrect edits one by one if you overwrite them once a week on dozens of objects. Sorting this issue out manually is up to you. | |
| 6 | 2024-11-05 14:34 | Evgeniya_rocketdata ♦14 | thanks for the answer! We understand everything! | |
| 158523601 by Im Fokus @ 2024-10-30 03:16 | 1 | 2024-11-03 10:14 | mueschel | Hallo,was heißt denn sidewalk:both:restrictions = trees? |
| 2 | 2024-11-03 23:17 | Im Fokus ♦15 | Naja: auf beiden Gehsteigen Einschränkungen durch Bäume.Kann man in der bekannten "Straßensicht" gut sehen. | |
| 3 | 2024-11-05 13:44 | mueschel | Ich verstehe. "restrictions" wird in OSM allerdings nicht verwendet und "restriction" steht für einschränkende Verkehrsregeln.Man könnte hazard=trees setzen - aber eine wirkliche Gefahr sehe ich da nicht.Am besten setzt man sidewalk:both:width für die Br... | |
| 4 | 2024-11-05 17:20 | Im Fokus ♦15 | Dein Vorschlag entspricht natürlich den OSM-Regularien, die Du sicher besser kennst als ich. Ich habe dennoch einen neuen Ansatz gewählt, da die Durchgangsbreite an den schmalen Stellen, nämlich hinter einigen Bäumen, so gering ist, dass nur schlanke Menschen dort überhaupt ... | |
| 158450404 by lski0 @ 2024-10-28 11:06 | 1 | 2024-10-29 18:59 | mueschel | Hi,all the 4000 trees you imported here have many strange tags that are not in use in any other place.Please make sure you always use common tagging styles and don't invent new tags.Additionally: As this is a large import, please point us to the required documentation of it. The sourc... |
| 2 | 2024-10-30 10:07 | lski0 ♦1 | Hi,strange tags are removed from this changeset, the rest will be modified soon and the source is added. Thank you. | |
| 3 | 2024-11-02 17:27 | mueschel | There are still more than 2300 trees with these tags. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-09 23:05 | ivanbranco ♦2,697 | Hi Iski0,the standard unit for the circumference value is meters. e.g. circumference=183.0 should be circumference=1.83could you fix them? thanks and good mapping | |
| 5 | 2025-06-11 07:29 | lski0 ♦1 | Hi ivanbranco,if you have some proposition on how to do it i'm happy to do it. | |
| 6 | 2025-06-11 10:01 | ivanbranco ♦2,697 | I will try doing it myself. I tried it with two nodes and worked, I will go on with the rest of them soon: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167482890 | |
| 158403098 by alessiopiccioli @ 2024-10-27 09:02 | 1 | 2024-11-02 16:58 | mueschel | Hi,you add a "name:ck" Tag, but 'ck' is not a valid language code. Which language is it? |
| 158529509 by mueschel @ 2024-10-30 08:17 | 1 | 2024-10-30 08:59 | thautal ♦34 | Greetings! Is there are a reason why this was completely removed? I think it's an office of NGO, just wrongly tagged |
| 2 | 2024-10-30 09:14 | mueschel | The node just had the username of the mapper added as key and value - no useful information there.If there is some POI in this place, please feel free to add it. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-30 09:41 | thautal ♦34 | I think the username is member of the said NGO and tried to add their office. I will add it now, thank you for the clarification! | |
| 158398194 by TDPA @ 2024-10-27 04:46 | 1 | 2024-10-27 10:05 | mueschel | Hi,you added many "id_point" tags which looks like a mistake. Could you check that? |
| 2 | 2024-10-28 06:48 | TDPA ♦2 | Bonjour,se n'est pas une erreur, la commune viens de certifier l'adressage de sa commune et je met le plan à jour. c'est le reflet de la BAN. Cordialement. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-28 09:21 | mueschel | Hi,thanks for the explanation!Maybe it's better to change to a common tag, "ref", possibly with an extension like "ref:BAN".Tags like "id*" are not common and also not documented in the Wiki. | |
| 158328270 by ODULANA OLUWATOYIN @ 2024-10-25 09:23 | 1 | 2024-10-26 13:03 | mueschel | Please don't upload your field notes directly without adding proper tags.You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.This is necessary to make sure that every other u... |
| 158350390 by KennyBB @ 2024-10-25 18:36 | 1 | 2024-10-26 13:02 | mueschel | Please don't upload your field notes directly without adding proper tags.You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.This is necessary to make sure that every other u... |
| 158278568 by AzuisRiver @ 2024-10-24 03:42 | 1 | 2024-10-25 08:34 | mueschel | Please check your recent edits. There are dozens of "motercycle" tags by you and your colleagues. |
| 2 | 2024-10-25 23:01 | AzuisRiver ♦3 | Thank you for identifying and informing me about this issue. The incorrect motercycle=yes have been updated to motorcycle=yes tags here but I will help ensure that they are corrected across all of Indonesia as soon as possible - Best. | |
| 158282503 by LompoulDesert @ 2024-10-24 06:55 | 1 | 2024-10-25 08:34 | mueschel | Please check your recent edits. There are dozens of "motercycle" tags by you and your colleagues. |
| 2 | 2024-10-25 23:18 | LompoulDesert ♦2 | Thank you for letting us know about this discrepancy. We will find all the incorrect motercycle=yes tags in Indonesia and update them to the correct motorcycle=yes regardless of who added them or when they were added very soon. The tags have been updated here. Your input has been most helpful! Have ... | |
| 158248245 by ODULANA OLUWATOYIN @ 2024-10-23 11:20 | 1 | 2024-10-25 08:22 | mueschel | Hi,You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor. This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data. Examples: boys = yes elde... |
| 2 | 2024-11-10 09:22 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12281594064/historyis it really place SELLING water? | |
| 3 | 2024-12-12 11:29 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | tried sending PM to them | |
| 4 | 2025-01-30 14:20 | ODULANA OLUWATOYIN ♦6 | they are the headings for the locational description ( longitude , and latitude) | |
| 5 | 2025-01-30 14:21 | ODULANA OLUWATOYIN ♦6 | what do you suggest to do for editing the headings for this categories ? | |
| 6 | 2025-02-03 20:30 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | > what do you suggest to do for editing the headings for this categories ?latitude and longitude is specified by locating element at appropriate position and does not need to be included at all> what do you suggest to do for editing the headings for this categories ?depends is ... | |
| 7 | 2025-02-04 10:50 | ODULANA OLUWATOYIN ♦6 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12281594064/history indicating ownership to be private /individual , most are found in houses in the area | |
| 8 | 2025-02-04 10:53 | ODULANA OLUWATOYIN ♦6 | (You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.)This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.)Hi, Thank you for the above , this is noted. | |
| 9 | 2025-02-04 14:32 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | BTW "Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor." is wrong and not correct.It is strongly preferable to use such whenever feasible, but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=ATYL is a thing | |
| 10 | 2025-02-04 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12281594064/history indicating ownership to be private /individual , most are found in houses in the areais https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12281594064/history a shop selling water, like ones described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dw... | |
| 11 | 2025-03-05 15:20 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | send https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1236463 | |
| 12 | 2025-03-06 10:34 | ODULANA OLUWATOYIN ♦6 | yes please, a shop selling water. | |
| 13 | 2025-03-06 14:20 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | then I changed it to shop=water from shop=Water to match established value for that ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dwater ) | |
| 158224815 by Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld @ 2024-10-22 18:42 | 1 | 2024-10-24 18:02 | mueschel | Hi,you added the tag "tepels = tepels" to about 100 trees - this looks like a mistake. Could you check that? |
| 2 | 2024-10-24 18:19 | Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld ♦16 | Aah, that is indeed an error. It was a tag used for filtering in JOSM. Are there anymore weird tags? | |
| 158266982 by Sabitu @ 2024-10-23 18:43 | 1 | 2024-10-24 18:01 | mueschel | Hi,You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.Examples: boys = yes elderly = ... |
| 158272982 by KennyBB @ 2024-10-23 22:09 | 1 | 2024-10-24 18:01 | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.Examples: boys = yes\... |
| 158232398 by wildmaps @ 2024-10-22 23:37 | 1 | 2024-10-24 17:58 | mueschel | Hi,could you check these edits? You added the tag "linea=parco" to many of these lines. |
| 2 | 2024-10-24 18:01 | wildmaps ♦39 | Hi, i added the "virtual" tag linea=parco to the lines Ilthat I have to add to the relation. I did that to not forgot to delete theme. I hope to finish this today. Thanks | |
| 3 | 2024-10-25 02:04 | wildmaps ♦39 | Thanks. Now i finished ;) | |
| 158189462 by dromedar61 @ 2024-10-21 22:12 | 1 | 2024-10-22 14:02 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way, it doesn't have proper tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327113211 |
| 2 | 2024-10-22 15:00 | dromedar61 ♦25 | thanks for checking, is fixed now. | |
| 158173093 by Interno Verde @ 2024-10-21 14:27 | 1 | 2024-10-22 13:51 | mueschel | Hi,all these nodes don't have any valid tag. What is the source of this information?Where can we find the required documentation of this import? |
| 158142051 by npaixao @ 2024-10-20 19:01 | 1 | 2024-10-21 17:33 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this edit? There are two nodes with a strange ved=ved tag. |
| 158119779 by hundenvonPenang @ 2024-10-20 09:30 | 1 | 2024-10-21 17:31 | mueschel | Hi,please check your imported boundaries for errors and warnings.If I check them in JOSM, I get more than 2500 warnings and errors. Please always make sure you fix these before uploading! |
| 157953903 by Bosotti_JC @ 2024-10-16 08:47 | 1 | 2024-10-19 09:18 | mueschel | Hi,you added some payment tags here that are not used in other places. Do you actually pay with your ID card here, or is it used only to authenticate yourself? |
| 2 | 2024-10-21 07:20 | Bosotti_JC ♦1 | Hi,is it used only to authenticate yourself. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-21 07:23 | Bosotti_JC ♦1 | Sorry, if you think the tag is wrong can you advise me which to insert?Thank you! | |
| 4 | 2024-10-21 07:49 | mueschel | Thanks for the explanation!There is a dedicated key for this:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aauthentication%3A*authentication:contactless=yes should be the basic tag to describe the method.Maybe you could add these for the details:authentication:id_cardauthentication:heal... | |
| 142864277 by marek kleciak @ 2023-10-20 10:53 | 1 | 2024-10-20 18:09 | mueschel | Hi,there are two ways with tags like this one:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168266489Are they still needed? |
| 158110672 by Anonymous897234 @ 2024-10-20 00:19 | 1 | 2024-10-20 08:08 | mueschel | Hi,something went wrong here. You deleted the wrong version of the objects - removing the original one and keeping new ones with wrong tags like id = 289462654relations = []type= wayYour duplication issue happened because you loaded a geojson or similar file into JOSM and then try ... |
| 2 | 2024-10-21 04:39 | Anonymous897234 ♦6 | Yeah. It was a bit 50/50 on which duplicate I removed. Background was the use of https://osminedit.pavie.info to do indoor tagging; that site failed on upload but lets you download the changeset as geojson, which then failed to merge in JOSM. Mistakes were made. I'll do another round of... | |
| 158109474 by Zemlemer-Geodesist @ 2024-10-19 22:54 | 1 | 2024-10-20 08:01 | mueschel | Hi,the tag "diameter_trunk" is not used in any other place. The common way to tag the size of the trunk of a tree is using "circumference". Could you convert these tags? |
| 158040030 by Evgeniya_rocketdata @ 2024-10-18 08:39 | 1 | 2024-10-19 15:06 | mueschel | Please stop reverting the edits of other mappers.You repeatedly added undocumented tags here which already have been fixed four times. |
| 158016121 by thierydem @ 2024-10-17 16:11 | 1 | 2024-10-19 14:38 | mueschel | Hi,the tag "GV:text" is not yet used in other places. You can add the text on these signs directly in the "traffic_sign" tag in [ ], e.g.traffic_sign = BE:E1,GV[Mo-Fr 07:30-17:00] |
| 2 | 2024-10-20 08:05 | thierydem ♦4 | Dank je om me dit te melden, zo zie je maar dat iedereen nog kan bijleren.Thank you for letting me know, it just goes to show that everyone can still learn something. | |
| 157895151 by Robert46798 @ 2024-10-14 20:23 | 1 | 2024-10-19 11:06 | mueschel | Schau bitte mal nach diesem Weg, "asp=raised" sieht nach einem Fehler aushttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323949088 |
| 2 | 2024-10-21 19:39 | Robert46798 ♦191 | In der Tat. Danke, ist behoben. | |
| 157927274 by álvaro5987seg @ 2024-10-15 15:47 | 1 | 2024-10-17 12:29 | mueschel | Hi,you used some bicycle tags here that are not used in other places:bicycle:lanes = yesbicycle:placement = use_primaryPlease have a look to the Wiki and the documenation of cycleway tags to see how such lanes are commonly tagged.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway |
| 157944155 by quincylvania @ 2024-10-16 02:04 | 1 | 2024-10-17 12:09 | mueschel | Hi,it seems very strange to have so many webcams on a single node. They all show different things. It would be very helpful to have these cams on individual nodes in their actual position, including a tag for the direction they point. |
| 2 | 2024-10-17 15:24 | quincylvania ♦53 | Hi mueschel, I assume you're talking about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12080242757 ? I agree the webcams should be mapped separately when possible. I think also having the webcam links on the monitoring site is still useful. But in this case the stockade bridge webcam is somewhat upstre... | |
| 3 | 2024-10-17 15:38 | quincylvania ♦53 | Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158014656 | |
| 157950466 by mueschel @ 2024-10-16 07:09 | 1 | 2024-10-16 07:38 | aTarom ♦769 | "kick-scooter_parking" to "kick_scooter_parking"?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12250806937/historyCheers |
| 2 | 2024-10-16 07:53 | mueschel | Ah yes...The tags in use areamenity=kick-scooter_parkingbut kick_scooter_parking = *I'll fix that later. | |
| 157926704 by VLD282 @ 2024-10-15 15:34 | 1 | 2024-10-16 06:59 | mueschel | Hi,could you check these edits? There are many 'crossing:signal' instead of the correct 'crossing:signals'. And this strange combination: crossing = traffic_signals crossing:signals = no |
| 2 | 2024-10-16 15:49 | VLD062 ♦41 | HelloMueschel,Thank you for providing your feedback :) I am currently assisting VLD282 in reviewing and correcting these tags. Please find the necessary fixes in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157971443I will look for other misused crossing:signal=* tags for Paris. T... | |
| 157835413 by wielandb @ 2024-10-13 13:31 | 1 | 2024-10-14 17:19 | mueschel | Hallo, was meinst du mit "lev"? Diese Fahrzeugart gibt es in OSM noch nicht. |
| 2 | 2024-10-15 11:27 | wielandb ♦132 | Oh ja, stimmt, da habe ich aus den Hinterecken meines Gehirns versehentlich das hier rausgeholt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:access#electric_vehicles:~:text=have%20lev%3Dyes%20or%20lev%3Ddesignated%20for%20the%20workhorseDas ist natürlich kein anerkannter Tag, sondern nur... | |
| 3 | 2024-10-15 13:22 | mueschel | Was genau bzw. welche Beschilderung wolltest du denn eintragen? Das hier?https://westnordost.de/p/245876.jpgDas bezieht sich explizit auf E-Autos und wird an anderen Stellen erfasst als "electric_car", hier alsoparking:right:electric_car = designated | |
| 4 | 2024-10-15 13:35 | wielandb ♦132 | Leider eben nicht. :( (Bzw. wenn, ist es falsch, wenn das so getagged ist bei diesem Zeichen) Da müssten wir im Forum mal drüber sprechen. Es gibt halt noch kein richtiges Tagging für die Situation in Deutschland.(Bzw. halt nicht für die Situation auf der ganzen Welt, aber ic... | |
| 5 | 2024-10-15 13:56 | mueschel | Wir reden aber von dem gezeigten Schild? Genau das wird als electric_car erfasst - egal ob das nun völlig korrekt ist oder nicht. Das wichtigste ist erst einmal ein einheitliches Tagging, das man später noch entsprechend anpassen kann.Zusätzlich einfach das passende traffic_sign=* s... | |
| 6 | 2024-10-15 14:13 | wielandb ♦132 | Hmm... > Genau das wird als electric_car erfasstHättest du dafür eine Quelle o.ä., an der ich mich orientieren kann?Wenn dir das so lieber ist, kann ich es gerne so ändern wie du vorschlägst, bis es eine Einigung gibt. Solange traffic_sign dransteht ist ja all... | |
| 7 | 2024-10-15 14:54 | wielandb ♦132 | Hier ist der Forumsbeitrag:https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/access-werte-fur-ladesaulen-vz-in-deutschland/120202Diskutier' gerne mit. :) | |
| 157848590 by plamen @ 2024-10-13 19:05 | 1 | 2024-10-14 17:12 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this import? There's a large number of foreign tags on many ways. Can these tags be removed? |
| 157839281 by ZeroStreet @ 2024-10-13 15:03 | 1 | 2024-10-14 10:05 | mueschel | Please don't use the main OSM database for "test adding" objects. There is a dedicated development server for these purposes. Also, please read and follow the import guidelines before uploading any external dataset:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 157823661 by demon_box @ 2024-10-13 08:13 | 1 | 2024-10-13 16:10 | mueschel | Hi,"prenotation = required" is not a common tag (and not an English word). Do you need to make an appointment to enter? Then maybe opening_hours = "on appointment" would be appropriate.If you just need to get a permit, the tag could befoot:conditional = yes @ permit |
| 2 | 2024-10-13 16:28 | ivanbranco ♦2,697 | I think reservation=required was intended. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-13 17:11 | demon_box ♦358 | Sorry, fixed with reservation=requiredThanks! | |
| 157808304 by Antonio Eugenio Burriel @ 2024-10-12 18:19 | 1 | 2024-10-13 11:45 | mueschel | Hi,the access and turn lanes you added here are not used in other places and don't fit the usual tagging schemes.Could you explain what you wanted to tag? access:lanes:left = forward access:lanes:right = forward turn:lanes:left = forward turn:lanes:right = forward |
| 2 | 2024-10-13 12:57 | Antonio Eugenio Burriel ♦31 | Hello Mueschel,thank you for your message. I was trying to represent that only the right lane is allowed to leave the road and that no lane changes are allowed.This morning I was already thinking that my tags were too confusing and indeed there are better ways to express this restriction.I&#... | |
| 157747209 by dorcasm @ 2024-10-11 08:59 | 1 | 2024-10-13 10:13 | mueschel | Welcome to OSM!you used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.Examples of these problematic tag... |
| 157616470 by adetour @ 2024-10-08 09:21 | 1 | 2024-10-12 09:39 | mueschel | Hi,you added the new tag "coco=yes" here - what does it mean? |
| 2 | 2024-10-13 04:00 | adetour ♦2 | Hey, its a company owned company operated pump, https://www.iocl.com/guidelines-for-selection-of-coco-service-provider | |
| 3 | 2024-10-13 04:01 | adetour ♦2 | is there a standard tag for these pumps already | |
| 4 | 2024-10-13 08:06 | mueschel | You can use these keys to specify the different companies and people involved:brandoperatorowner | |
| 157784890 by mga_geo @ 2024-10-12 08:48 | 1 | 2024-10-13 07:58 | mueschel | Hi,you added the new tag "gtfs:stop_id:Malo Agglo Transports" here. In general keys should not contain any spaces.If you look at the list of other gtfs tags you can see that the more usual scheme is slightly different:https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/gtfs%3Astop_id#similar\... |
| 2 | 2024-10-13 07:59 | mueschel | Please excuse my spelling mistake - it should be gtfs:stop_id:FR-MAT | |
| 3 | 2024-10-13 09:47 | mga_geo ♦245 | C'était un essai pour les rapprochements avec PTNA. Essai non concluant, j'ai supprimé ces attributs. | |
| 157726931 by B4ron @ 2024-10-10 17:46 | 1 | 2024-10-12 09:04 | mueschel | Hallo,bitte überprüfe deine Änderungen an Hydranten - diese deutschen Tags sind nicht korrekt:Durchmesser = 150Position = laneTyp = undergroundhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency=fire_hydrant |
| 2 | 2024-10-12 12:14 | B4ron ♦1 | Hallo mueschel,vielen Dank für den Hinweis, wie müsste es denn deiner Meinung nach richtig lauten, damit ich das korrigieren kann?Danke und Grüße | |
| 3 | 2024-10-12 12:17 | mueschel | Schau mal in die Tabellen auf der verlinkten Wiki-Seitefire_hydrant:diameter=*fire_hydrant:position=*fire_hydrant:type=* | |
| 4 | 2024-10-12 12:32 | B4ron ♦1 | Auf der Hilfeseite hatte ich geschaut, wusste aber nicht genau was jetzt gemeint ist.Es geht also nur darum die aktuellen Begriffe durch den entsprechenden Begriff den du gepostet hast zu ersetzen? Also z.B. Durchmesser durch fire_hydrant:diameter=* , etc..? | |
| 5 | 2024-10-12 16:24 | mueschel | Ja genau.Hat OsmAnd da keine vorgegebenen Keys? Das würde mich wundern, da die Werte (lane, underground) ja korrekt sind. | |
| 157753158 by mutindajohn @ 2024-10-11 11:40 | 1 | 2024-10-12 09:15 | mueschel | Hi,you used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.Please have a look to the documented tags i... |
| 157746805 by Dickson Kariuki @ 2024-10-11 08:46 | 1 | 2024-10-12 09:14 | mueschel | Welcome to OSM!you used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.Please have a look to the docum... |
| 157721959 by Noman Bin Hossain @ 2024-10-10 15:42 | 1 | 2024-10-12 09:12 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain what these tags mean? You added them to many buildings, but they are neither documented nor used in other places.Cooling_center = yesCooling_center_bd = yes |
| 157753166 by Evgeniya_rocketdata @ 2024-10-11 11:40 | 1 | 2024-10-12 08:59 | mueschel | Please stop reverting the edits of other mappers. You repeatedly added undocumented tags here which already have been fixed three times. |
| 157726128 by lleveto @ 2024-10-10 17:26 | 1 | 2024-10-11 10:00 | mueschel | Hi,could you point us to the mandatory import documentation? All these ways have many foreign tags that shouldn't be in OSM.Also, none of these ways is connected to any other highway, which makes the ways rather useless, because they are just loops that can't be reached from anywhere... |
| 157677193 by holubekp @ 2024-10-09 15:14 | 1 | 2024-10-10 10:08 | mueschel | Hi,please check this import - all the buildings have strange tags:dont_tag_buildings = Falsedont_tag_buildings2 = False |
| 157526734 by TFI71 @ 2024-10-06 07:24 | 1 | 2024-10-08 13:32 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain what a "fairway=boat" is? This tag is not used in any other place |
| 2 | 2024-10-09 05:27 | TFI71 ♦5 | Hi,There have been added water trails for small boats like canoe, kayaks paddle boards etc. Please have a look at the following OSM docu site for more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Water_trails | |
| 3 | 2024-10-09 06:04 | TFI71 ♦5 | there is also a nice video from Quincy Morgan explaining how to map water trails in OSM:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXq6XYhDQlE | |
| 4 | 2024-10-09 06:17 | mueschel | The tag 'fairway=*' is not mentioned on this page. | |
| 5 | 2024-10-09 06:41 | TFI71 ♦5 | if I have tagged "fairway=boat", this is is a mistake. It should be "waterway=fairway, boat=*"Where exactly is this the case? I will then correct | |
| 6 | 2024-10-09 18:20 | mueschel | We're too late, it is already fixed:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1321559906 | |
| 157532200 by mnalis ALTernative @ 2024-10-06 10:10 | 1 | 2024-10-08 13:28 | mueschel | Hi,do you have a explicit permission by the owner of the restaurant to publish images of the printed menus? |
| 2 | 2024-10-08 17:42 | Matija Nalis ♦116 | Hi @mueschel!I gather you imply that explicit owner permission should be required? Can you clarify why you think so? | |
| 3 | 2024-10-09 18:06 | mueschel | First, there are many people who don't want to publish their prices and menu on the internet for various reasons. Second, there is a problem of copyright with respect to printed menus: Often the creator / designer of them has a copyright that doesn't allow further copies or reproductions... | |
| 4 | 2024-10-29 11:24 | Matija Nalis ♦116 | Thanks for your insight; I've created a topic at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/adding-image-menu-on-resturants/120806 to try to find community consensus | |
| 157626551 by mueschel @ 2024-10-08 13:19 | 1 | 2024-10-09 17:30 | maro21 ♦711 | Why? |
| 2 | 2024-10-09 17:58 | mueschel | There is a general consensus that OSM is not a directory of prices of various amenities. See e.g. here in a recent question about hotel prices:https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/complex-hotel-price-charge-or-charge-conditional/115275/1 | |
| 157484401 by CowCowManThingit @ 2024-10-05 05:24 | 1 | 2024-10-08 13:14 | mueschel | Hi,are you sure about the communications tags here? communication:1g is obsolete since about 1990. |
| 157479512 by ccampoy @ 2024-10-04 22:11 | 1 | 2024-10-06 16:30 | mueschel | Welcome to OSM!you added several strange tags all across Spain:edificioEdificioedifícioPlease make sure that you only use the tags that are described in the Wiki or those that are available as presets in your editor. Only these tags can be understood by other mappers or can be use... |
| 157386010 by Fujexo @ 2024-10-02 16:00 | 1 | 2024-10-06 13:36 | mueschel | Hi,you added a strange currency tag here: currency:GerCould you check that? |
| 2 | 2024-10-07 06:08 | Fujexo ♦1 | Hi, thanks for pointing that out, must have been a typing mistake, I removed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157566057 | |
| 157277538 by dchertkovsky @ 2024-09-30 03:43 | 1 | 2024-10-02 17:22 | mueschel | Hi,please don't delete existing (and well visible in aerial images) paths on the request of someone. OSM maps what is on the ground, including access restricted paths. You can easily add all the required access tags to mark the paths as not usable by the public. |
| 157178138 by Lejun @ 2024-09-27 15:53 | 1 | 2024-10-01 10:09 | mueschel | Hi,could you check these edits?The man_made=tunnel in the North is a lot longer than the tunnel marked on the road. You also used 'maxheight' tags on the tunnel - they belong on the road. 'maxheight' always describes a legal height limit, not the actual height of an objec... |
| 2 | 2024-10-01 20:43 | Lejun ♦481 | Hi, I can confirm the accuracy of these data. I'll make myself a note to elongate the "tunneled" highway.Regarding the tags; Yeah. That's what I intend to do in the long run. I also made a big import regarding bridges, and thought that'd be more interesting (and fuel som... | |
| 3 | 2024-10-01 20:51 | mueschel | If you want feedback about your tagging, better ask directly in the forum. There are very few people actively monitoring edits - and I only found this edit because you used a tag that nobody used before. | |
| 157143235 by akino_germany @ 2024-09-26 19:05 | 1 | 2024-09-29 18:15 | mueschel | Hi,bei "destination" Tags gibt es eine feste Reihenfolge der Teile des Keys, z.B. destination:symbol:to:lanes:forwardAlle Keys sind aufgebaut wieKey-Subkey-To-Lanes-DirectionIch habe gerade ein paar korrigiert.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318490174 |
| 157139058 by Alexandre da Costa @ 2024-09-26 17:03 | 1 | 2024-09-29 16:55 | mueschel | Hi,"bridge:height:ele" is a new tag - which elevation is tagged here? |
| 2 | 2024-09-30 19:46 | Alexandre da Costa ♦2 | HelloActually, I tried to implement what was described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bridge3DBut I must admit that it does not work on this:https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=43.4971050&lon=-1.4821933&zoom=19&camera.theta=44.158&camera.phi=30.94If you have better, I am read... | |
| 157050464 by dmfr @ 2024-09-24 17:36 | 1 | 2024-09-29 08:56 | mueschel | Hi,you used some new tags here, e.g. "plant:output:steam:max". "plant:output:steam" is usually the total output capacity of the plant, i.e. the maximum possible. What does the second output mean? |
| 2 | 2024-09-29 14:51 | dmfr ♦53 | Hello! At that point I was trying to figure out how to express maximum power rating vs usual power production. I eventually realised OSM only has documented tags for the max power rating. So I'll fix this one, thanks for the heads-up! | |
| 157063990 by ClimGeoData @ 2024-09-25 05:21 | 1 | 2024-09-27 17:47 | mueschel | Hi,I had to revert this changeset. You uploaded a lot of duplicates of existing nodes.This happens if you load a geojson or similar file into JOSM and then try to upload it. You have to load data directly from the API or Overpass - every other way will lead to duplicates and not to editing the... |
| 2 | 2024-09-27 17:50 | ClimGeoData ♦1 | Apologies for the mess. Thank you for your help on this! That is exactly what I did. I tried to delete the duplicates in the next change set, not sure if that worked. | |
| 3 | 2024-09-27 17:52 | mueschel | I reverted this changeset as well - you deleted the original nodes, but not the new ones. Now everything is as it was 3 days ago. | |
| 156919613 by Leonardo Gutierrez @ 2024-09-21 16:26 | 1 | 2024-09-23 17:20 | mueschel | Please don't revert changesets blindly. I now had to fix the main road for a third time - it was again completely blocked for all traffic, apart from dogs. And please also check all the warnings you get from the editor - like buildings on a highway, nodes with landuse tags and similar. |
| 156823300 by wildmaps @ 2024-09-19 14:23 | 1 | 2024-09-22 13:01 | mueschel | Hallo,die toll:* Tags sind etwas seltsam:"8 EUR (before 10:00 and after 15:00) / 6 EUR (15:00 onward)"Die beiden Zeiträume überlappen sich. Was bezahlt man denn zu welchen Zeiten? |
| 2 | 2024-09-22 13:45 | wildmaps ♦39 | Hallo, da ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen.Bis zum 03.11.2024 kann man die Straße mit dem eigenen PKW vor 10.00 Uhr und ab 15.00 Uhr erreichen. Auffahrtsgebühr auf die Plätzwiese:- Autos bis max. 9 Sitzplätze 10,00 €- Motorräder 8,00 €- Personen mit Be... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-22 13:45 | wildmaps ♦39 | Ja mit dem Behindertenausweis kannst du jederzeit auf die Plätzwiese fahren. Es genügt den Ausweis am Kontrollpunkt Brückele vorzuweisen. Für PKW`s mit Behindertenausweis gilt eine reduzierte Auffahrsgebühr. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-22 13:46 | wildmaps ♦39 | Weiter Infos: https://www.prags.bz/de/plaetzwiese | |
| 5 | 2024-09-22 17:05 | mueschel | Ich habe die Tags editiert, ich denke jetzt sollte es passen. | |
| 156775844 by alain2003 @ 2024-09-18 14:15 | 1 | 2024-09-22 12:54 | mueschel | Hi,two bus stops got a strange "bpub" tag - could you check that?e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5051218888 |
| 2 | 2024-09-23 11:00 | alain2003 ♦22 | Hi,This is a type errorfixed | |
| 156920850 by Reino Baptista @ 2024-09-21 16:52 | 1 | 2024-09-22 08:41 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of the new tags "geological:site = geosite"and"geological: site = geosite"?These are not in use up to now, and I don't understand their meaning. The main "geological" tag seems to be sufficient to mark a place as geologi... |
| 2 | 2024-09-22 11:45 | Reino Baptista ♦93 | Hi,A Geosite (also Geoheritage https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoheritage) are places of geological significance usually inside Geoparks (https://www.unesco.org/en/iggp/geoparks/about).In Portugal there are 6 parks (https://www.visitportugal.com/en/node/426541) comprising several geosite(s).... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-22 11:54 | Reino Baptista ♦93 | PPS."geological: site" it's a a typo mistake. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-22 12:37 | mueschel | Hi,thanks for the details!I wonder if this fits into the tagging scheme for protected areas, although it's only part of a larger geopark. | |
| 156719279 by David Osipov @ 2024-09-17 08:49 | 1 | 2024-09-22 09:59 | mueschel | Hi,the translated operator tags here don't make sense. You can't simply translate to SARL / LLC / GmbH / OOO - these are completely different legal types of companies. |
| 2 | 2024-09-22 12:22 | David Osipov ♦9 | Hi! Could you please elaborate a bit? OOO = Общество с ограниченной ответственностью, which is Limited Liability Company, which is the same as GmbH and SARL (Société à responsabilité limitée) | |
| 3 | 2024-09-22 12:31 | mueschel | The terms all describe something similar, but all with respect to some countries specific law. It's not a part of the name that can be translated, but a legal designation given by law that is fixed. It describes which particular law the company is subject to. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-22 12:38 | David Osipov ♦9 | Oh, that's a good point but, for example, here https://www.bia.ge/EN/Company/64333?VisitCompanyType=3&ServiceCategoryId=68&ServiceId=3708 and here https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.tabori_resort_llc.778406f2557fd213ef428d36e3a6e227.html they are listed as LLC, not ... | |
| 156871696 by mf8s003j @ 2024-09-20 14:47 | 1 | 2024-09-22 08:44 | mueschel | Hi,you used the new tag "maxtyres=6" here. Is this really a limitation on the number of tires, or is it the more usual maxaxles=3? I.e. do double tires on one axle count or not?Are trailers included in the count? |
| 2 | 2024-09-22 12:03 | mf8s003j ♦24 | The legal description is not the usual axles. It is 6 total tyres. From the bylaw quoted in the changeset source:"No person shall operate a truck or truck tractor, which has more than six tires, along Jubilee Avenue, unless the vehicle is conducting business on Jubilee Avenue or on streets ... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-22 12:24 | mueschel | Thanks for the details!"unless the vehicle is conducting business on Jubilee Avenue" sounds like hgv = destination would be correct. For "strange" rules like this I'd prefer to use a conditional tag - even if the particular condition is not understood by current routing ... | |
| 4 | 2024-09-23 13:34 | mf8s003j ♦24 | That's a great idea. I will make that change. | |
| 156007658 by mueschel @ 2024-08-31 10:15 | 1 | 2024-09-21 14:59 | Esneider Castro ♦3 | D |
| 2 | 2024-09-21 15:02 | Esneider Castro ♦3 | Disculpa, estas editando vías que tienen diferentes superficies y especificaciones, por favor tener mas cuidado al editar, y revisar mejor las ediciones, gracias. | |
| 3 | 2024-09-21 15:37 | mueschel | As I already explained, this statement is wrong. I did not merge any ways with different tags. All the ways had exactly the same tags. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-21 18:38 | Esneider Castro ♦3 | Podrías revertir los cambios y yo lo arreglo? Es para un proyecto de exposición y lo estoy intentando pulir, por favor | |
| 5 | 2024-09-21 18:44 | Esneider Castro ♦3 | Sigo agregando las etiquetas correspondientes y estoy uniendo las vías, pero por favor ayúdame a revertir los cambios y yo lo termino de arreglar. | |
| 6 | 2024-09-21 21:52 | mueschel | Please stop reverting my edits. Now the main road is again blocked for all traffic, except dogs at the bridge over Rio Surba.If you want to add individual tags to parts of a way, please do this manually by splitting the way again at the necessary places. | |
| 156796843 by Angry_Tau @ 2024-09-18 23:40 | 1 | 2024-09-19 10:04 | mueschel | Something went wrong here, you imported almost 10000 objects with tags like "FEATURE = RESIDENCE". Please have a look and fix these tags. |
| 156659244 by SeichuD47f3 @ 2024-09-15 18:17 | 1 | 2024-09-16 18:16 | mueschel | Hi,please check the tags you added on these trees. They got tags that are not used in other places likenumber = 50porte = Grandeprotected = SimPlease only use those tags that are documented in the Wiki or that are available as presets in your editor. Only these tags can be understood b... |
| 156636343 by Azharul Islam Anik @ 2024-09-15 07:39 | 1 | 2024-09-16 18:13 | mueschel | Hi,you uploaded about 150 nodes from your note taking application like this one:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12177906432/history/1Please make sure that you only upload nodes with proper tags. |
| 156679190 by Drakeley152 @ 2024-09-16 09:30 | 1 | 2024-09-16 18:05 | mueschel | Hi,please check your tags: I just fixed about 100 "Name:cy" to "name:cy". |
| 156417408 by raincandy @ 2024-09-09 23:46 | 1 | 2024-09-10 17:48 | mueschel | Hallo,bitte nutze OSM nicht als Datenbank für ein Dutzend Fotos einer Speisekarte, dafür ist hier nicht der richtige Ort.Außerdem: Hast du eine Genehmigung dieses Material hier online zu vervielfältigen? |
| 2 | 2024-09-14 23:03 | raincandy ♦2 | Hey!Ich kann damit gerne aufhören, aber aber hast du eine Quelle dafür, warum man das generell nicht tun sollte?Und wüsstest du von einem alternativem Ort, wo man solche Informationen veröffentlichen kann?Ich halte mich gern an alle Konventionen, aber kann leider nichts... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-15 12:29 | mueschel | Abfotografieren und Veröffentlichen von Druckwerken ist immer ein Problem, von dem am Ende oft auch der Ladenbesitzer nichts weiß. Manch einer möchte seine Preise auch nicht im Netz veröffentlichen, deswegen muss man da dabei immer vorsichtig sein. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-15 14:59 | raincandy ♦2 | Verstehe, da werde ich darauf achten, dass ich immer vorher Einverständnis hole!Vielen Dank für den Hinweis! | |
| 156560931 by hadhuey @ 2024-09-13 08:34 | 1 | 2024-09-15 11:50 | mueschel | Hallo,du hast hier ein Tag gesetzt: note = free passing of about 1.2mDas kannst du auch erfassen mit maxwidth:physical. |
| 2 | 2024-09-17 08:55 | hadhuey ♦17 | Hallo mueschel, danke für den Tipp. Ich bin da gerade selbst noch am rumprobieren. Das sind schon sehr spezielle Barrieren und maxwidth gilt ja eigentlich für das geöffnete Tor. Ich habe mal eine Anfrage im Wiki gestellt, inkl Foto. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:bar... | |
| 156580290 by Cubano153 @ 2024-09-13 16:25 | 1 | 2024-09-15 11:46 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain what this relation represents? All its tags are not used on any other waterway.https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18041183 |
| 156504403 by JeroenvanderGun @ 2024-09-11 21:53 | 1 | 2024-09-15 10:02 | mueschel | Hi,could we try to find a better / more usual tagging instead of access:variable = obstruction ?What's this C1 exactly and who can get it? |
| 2 | 2024-09-16 11:20 | JeroenvanderGun ♦182 | Dutch traffic sign C1: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nederlands_verkeersbord_C1_mb.svgEssentially this on-ramp can be closed remotely by the traffic control centre via dynamic traffic sign displays (in case of an incident in the Corbulotunnel).Not sure what the ideal tag for this i... | |
| 156600509 by David Osipov @ 2024-09-14 08:20 | 1 | 2024-09-15 09:43 | mueschel | Hi,please don't translate / transliterate the name of the architect and the garden into many language tags. These tags are only for cases of objects that actually have a name in these languages. OSM is also not the right place for long descriptions in 24 languages. These are in the scope ... |
| 2 | 2024-09-16 06:57 | David Osipov ♦9 | Hy mueschel, thank you for your message. I agree with the architect names in multiple languages - I'll remove many of these tags. On the descriptions - Georgia is a quite small country and there are not many Wikipedia articles in other languages on main tourist attractions + tourists use Or... | |
| 156414706 by Dbchdncindcnojasnxjoasvnhuwrfbh @ 2024-09-09 21:14 | 1 | 2024-09-14 09:37 | mueschel | Hi,please check this park, it got a strange 'gh' tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/642738746/history |
| 156313776 by ACKZESIBLE @ 2024-09-07 13:42 | 1 | 2024-09-08 16:44 | mueschel | Hi,you used some uncommon fuel tags here - could you check the wiki for the correct tags?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Afuelhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205740030 |
| 156272419 by Leszek Czudek @ 2024-09-06 12:20 | 1 | 2024-09-07 10:37 | mueschel | Hi,it seems something went wron ghere - you uploaded 1500 very short ways without valid tags. Can this be reverted? |
| 2 | 2024-09-07 14:30 | Leszek Czudek ♦17 | Hi. Thanks for your attention. You're right, this needs to be removed. I hope I've fixed it now. Could you check it out? Best regards. | |
| 156235487 by Jomokela Kennedy @ 2024-09-05 14:54 | 1 | 2024-09-06 09:14 | mueschel | Hi,please review these edits. There are many tags that are not used in other places or are incorrect, e.g.addr:boma = Mundri Centraladdr:payam = Mundridrinking_water = trueman_made = private_tapnatural = not_applicablePlease check the Wiki and the presets to see which are the prope... |
| 156213179 by Kachinn @ 2024-09-05 05:37 | 1 | 2024-09-06 08:54 | mueschel | Hi,please review your edits. You add a couple hundred "hihgway" tags. |
| 2 | 2024-09-06 09:07 | Kachinn ♦1 | Thanks your comment. | |
| 3 | 2024-09-06 10:24 | MyoKyawKyaw ♦124 | Hi Mueschel, Greeting from myOSM team!I will review and validate those wrong spelling tags via validating in HOT TM task and correct soon.Thanks for giving your leisure time for us. | |
| 138987160 by mueschel @ 2023-07-25 12:40 | 1 | 2024-09-04 00:23 | aceman444 ♦2,568 | Why this change? The traffic signals are still there, just turned off (when you did this change). They are actually enabled at this time. So it was never true that they were unrecoverably removed, which would justify tagging with 'was:'. 'disabled' and 'was' have differ... |
| 2 | 2024-09-04 06:23 | mueschel | 'disabled' refers to handicapped people and vehicles for them. If the lights are off, but not used any more, the correct prefix would be 'disused'. | |
| 3 | 2024-09-04 21:15 | aceman444 ♦2,568 | Yes, 'disused:' could be close to 'disabled:'. But 'was:' is clearly wrong.'disabled' only refers to disabled people when used as a key (at least on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disabled), not as a key prefix.Still 'disabled:' and ... | |
| 4 | 2024-09-04 22:04 | mueschel | A tag doesn't magically change its meaning just because of calling it "prefix" in front of a "key" instead of "key" with a "subkey"."disabled:XX" is and stays an access tag for disabled vehicles or a property thereof. It can never be a lifec... | |
| 5 | 2024-09-06 08:41 | mueschel | How about "unused"? This doesn't contain the "not any more" meaning from "disused" and doesn't have any double meaning like "disabled". | |
| 6 | 2024-09-29 16:26 | aceman444 ♦2,568 | Yes, I can use a different prefix :) | |
| 156105032 by Morten Lange @ 2024-09-02 15:44 | 1 | 2024-09-06 08:35 | mueschel | Hi, "access_simple" is a new tag - what does it mean? |
| 65839002 by Kuwaity26 @ 2018-12-28 11:41 | 1 | 2020-06-21 12:53 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain what 'PACI' means? This tag is not used in any other place.Thanks! |
| 2 | 2024-09-05 14:53 | Kuwaity26 ♦5 | Hi,PACI is a unique number used to identify each unit of building in Kuwait. I have recently wrote very briefly about it in the Kuwait wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kuwait. It is similar to France's SIRET, for which they use ref:FR:SIRET. Similarly, I began using ref:KW:PACI f... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-05 17:23 | mueschel | "ref:KW:PACI" sounds like exactly the right tag. I wouldn't put it in the addr:* Tags, unless it is used to send mail to the building. | |
| 156088480 by geraki @ 2024-09-02 09:27 | 1 | 2024-09-05 10:32 | mueschel | Hi,you added some 'ref:gr:mm' tags here. Could you change that to 'ref:GR:mm'? Country codes usally use capital letters. |
| 156023568 by Ana Becerra @ 2024-08-31 16:35 | 1 | 2024-09-04 09:32 | mueschel | Hi,please check this relation, it didn't get any valid tags. |
| 156012308 by Laci @ 2024-08-31 12:11 | 1 | 2024-09-03 14:10 | mueschel | Hallo,was möchtest du mit "overtaking:bicycle" sagen?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190847510So heißt das Tag, dass Fahrräder nicht überholen dürfen, was eher nicht stimmt. |
| 2 | 2024-09-03 16:37 | Laci ♦40 | Hi, ich wollte für dieses Verkehrszeichen taggen: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Zeichen_277.1_-_Verbot_des_%C3%9Cberholens_von_einspurigen_Fahrzeugen_f%C3%BCr_mehrspurige_Kraftfahrzeuge_und_Kraftr%C3%A4dern_mit_Beiwagen;_StVO_2020.svg | |
| 3 | 2024-09-03 17:24 | mueschel | Da hatten wir schon eine längere Überlegung zu...https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/strasse-mit-verkehrszeichen-zeichen-de-277-1-taggen/4235/45Bis jetzt gibt es kein wirklich etabliertes Tagging - wir haben einfach noch keinen Weg eine Abhängigkeit von dem Fahrzeug das ü... | |
| 4 | 2024-09-03 17:25 | mueschel | Sorry, das letzte muss heißen "Neben Motorrädern sind Radfahrer die einzigen die auf der Straße Radfahrer überholen dürfen." | |
| 155963318 by Jakka @ 2024-08-30 09:10 | 1 | 2024-09-03 09:54 | mueschel | Hi,"socket:supercharger" is not a valid socket type. Could you clarify which kind of sockets are available here? |
| 2 | 2024-09-03 10:34 | Jakka ♦1,814 | https://www.allego.eu/nl/charging-station/tervuursesteenweg-308-bertem/ | |
| 156068168 by Adilene Rmz @ 2024-09-01 18:47 | 1 | 2024-09-03 08:10 | mueschel | Reminder:You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.Let us know in case you need help... |
| 156099418 by mueschel @ 2024-09-02 13:38 | 1 | 2024-09-02 18:41 | Kelso-Mg ♦126 | Hallo mueschel,das Gebäude wurde Abgerissen und meinerseits entsprechen mit dem präfix demolished versehen. Die Adresse gibt's also momentan nicht, als Anhaltspunkt für die zukünftige Adresse eines Neubaus, hatte ich die Adresse mit dem präfix preposed versehen. Von m... |
| 2 | 2024-09-02 19:06 | mueschel | Auch ohne Gebäude hat das Gelände noch eine Anschrift. Der Baustofflieferant sollte auch in der Lage sein, die Adresse in sein Navi eingeben zu können.Übrigens gibt es "preposed" nicht (deswegen habe ich das Objekt gefunden) und müsste "proposed" hei&... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-02 19:38 | Kelso-Mg ♦126 | Ok, bin bisher davon ausgegangen, dass Adressen zum Gebäude gehören, aber was du sagst, steht auch so im Wiki und mach jetzt aufgrund deiner Erläuterung für mich auch einen, nachvollziehbaren ein Sinn.Deshalb danke für deine Belehrung, werds mir merken.Gruß Kelso | |
| 4 | 2024-09-02 20:09 | Kelso-Mg ♦126 | Hallo nochmal, ich hätte diesbezüglich noch eine Frage, die du mir vielleicht noch beantworten könntest. Erlischt die Adresse, wenn es einen neuen Bebauungsplan gibt.Mit einer Neubebauung ändern sich die Adressen zumindest bei größeren Grundstücken ja ö... | |
| 155910492 by eteb3 @ 2024-08-29 05:56 | 1 | 2024-09-01 09:08 | mueschel | Hi,do you happen to have a picture of the socket you describe in the note? That would be really helpful. |
| 2 | 2024-09-01 09:31 | eteb3 ♦113 | I do, where can I post it? | |
| 3 | 2024-09-01 09:41 | mueschel | You could upload it to any image hosting service like imgur. | |
| 155870730 by Supaplex @ 2024-08-28 09:43 | 1 | 2024-09-01 08:48 | mueschel | Hi,you added the new tag "TDX:date" here. If this is the date of your dataset, shouldn't this be in "source:date" instead of your day of edit? |
| 111060332 by mueschel @ 2021-09-11 12:36 | 1 | 2024-08-30 10:16 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Hello,I advice ref:ration_shop in stead of ration_shop_numberand what's the licence ?not the correct keyhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3AlicenseRegards,Marc |
| 2 | 2024-08-30 10:32 | mueschel | I'm not the one who invented that tag, I just did a bit of cleanup here. | |
| 155747099 by Alexis_gast33 @ 2024-08-25 16:57 | 1 | 2024-08-29 17:42 | mueschel | Please stop editing immediately. You're destroying a huge amount of information. |
| 155802109 by mtmail @ 2024-08-26 20:45 | 1 | 2024-08-29 17:41 | mueschel | Hi,I see that you're correcting name tags here - please wait a few days. It's likely that there will be a larger revert of these changes which is easier if the nodes are not touched again. |
| 155850483 by Britzz @ 2024-08-27 20:32 | 1 | 2024-08-29 09:27 | mueschel | Hi,the access tag you added here seems strange - it looks like nobody is allowed to access this street during the day. What are the actual restrictions? |
| 2 | 2024-08-29 13:06 | Britzz ♦231 | i dont' understand the logical of ":conditionnal", if you can help me, with pleasure.It's private all the time but the gate is open every day from 8 to 19 so visitors can get in.Instead of :access = privateaccess:conditionnal = none @ 08:00-19:00what is the good tags ? | |
| 3 | 2024-08-29 13:11 | mueschel | It'saccess:conditional = yes @ 08:00-19:00You just use the access tag you would normally use, and add the time it applies after the '@'.And have a look for the spelling: "conditional" with a single 'n'. | |
| 4 | 2024-08-29 15:34 | Britzz ♦231 | thankswhen reading "access:conditional = yes @ 08:00-19:00" I would understand that from 19:00 to 08:00 nobody could enter, is that right ?In fca | |
| 5 | 2024-08-29 15:35 | Britzz ♦231 | In facts, residents can enter all the time | |
| 6 | 2024-08-29 16:18 | mueschel | During the times not listed the normal access tag takes over. Currently it will be 'private' during every night. | |
| 7 | 2024-08-30 15:46 | Britzz ♦231 | i have corrected, thank you for the explication | |
| 155807715 by carlosassuncao92 @ 2024-08-27 01:53 | 1 | 2024-08-28 10:08 | mueschel | Hi,you invented new tags to classify the owner of businesses here. I would like to point you to a long discussion about that with a lot of arguments why this might not be a good thing to do:https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-minority-owned-and-women-owned-businesses/ |
| 155758181 by Luiiisbaker @ 2024-08-25 22:51 | 1 | 2024-08-27 14:34 | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM.In your edits you added several tags that are notused in any other place. Please check the Wiki and the presets in your editor to see which tags are documented and in use in other places.If you need help, feel free to ask in the forums! |
| 155754606 by Linus W Frische @ 2024-08-25 20:26 | 1 | 2024-08-27 14:26 | mueschel | Hi,please check the parking tags you added. The ":side" in the key needs to be replaced by left/right/both. |
| 155675928 by CAM-Gerlach @ 2024-08-23 23:53 | 1 | 2024-08-26 12:15 | mueschel | HI,could you check the parking tags?'parking:both:access:private' should be 'parking:both:private'. |
| 2 | 2024-08-27 20:49 | CAM-Gerlach ♦25 | Oops, sorry about that! Thanks for the catch; I'd checked the wiki and taginfo before as usual but saw very low usage (only a few hundred hits) of the correct tag and none of my many validators flagged the incorrect one, so I didn't realize I'd made a mistake and not entered it correc... | |
| 155755641 by Ntsou @ 2024-08-25 20:59 | 1 | 2024-08-26 07:16 | mueschel | Hi,please check this way, it doesn't have any valid tagshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311117945 |
| 155683905 by Alexis_gast33 @ 2024-08-24 08:35 | 1 | 2024-08-25 10:00 | mueschel | Hi,these edits added several tags like "Nom: Occitan" that shouldn't be in OSM - the correct one would be name:ocIn addition you deleted many existing tags. I suggest to revert all these edits and redo the correct edits in a clean way. |
| 155718651 by ailed_melero @ 2024-08-25 01:54 | 1 | 2024-08-25 09:48 | mueschel | Reminder:You added many tags here that are not used in any other place. In OSM we have to use the tags that are defined in the wiki or available as presets in the editor - only these can be understood by other mappers and applications.You're always welcome to ask in the forums in case... |
| 155718043 by Asor_12 @ 2024-08-25 00:57 | 1 | 2024-08-25 09:47 | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!ou used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.To help keep the OSM database... |
| 151089516 by mueschel @ 2024-05-09 09:11 | 1 | 2024-08-23 22:10 | Leonardo Gutierrez ♦17 | Saludos, Las vías eran cortas porque tenían diferentes tipo de superficie, al unirlos se destruyó la información de la superficie. Por favor tenga cuidado . |
| 2 | 2024-08-24 07:20 | mueschel | Hi,there was no information destroyed. All the ways had and still have absolutely identical tags. Otherwise I couldn't have merged them easily.You're revert also reintroduced wrong tags like "maxwidth" (there is for sure no restriction on vehicles wider than 7 meters) or a ... | |
| 155572790 by EnforcerOfTime @ 2024-08-21 18:13 | 1 | 2024-08-23 17:12 | mueschel | Please check your edits. You uploaded thousands of nodes that are not tagged any not used on any way.You also added tags like these:entity =\tstreet_light street_light_type =verticalThey are not used in any other place. Please make sure you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or... |
| 2 | 2024-08-23 17:17 | EnforcerOfTime ♦2 | I did not intend to upload any of those nodes. Is there a way to revert the entire changeset? | |
| 3 | 2024-08-23 17:20 | mueschel | Yes, I'll have a look. There are also several hundred buildings uploaded twice. | |
| 4 | 2024-08-23 17:29 | mueschel | I reverted this pack of changesets with 58000 objects. It was early enough that nobody edited the objects in the meantime which made it easy. It might be that there was some intentional change you wanted to do which is lost now. Could you check that? | |
| 5 | 2024-08-23 17:29 | EnforcerOfTime ♦2 | Yes, definitely we want to revert this whole changeset. I uploaded the wrong layer from JOSM. | |
| 6 | 2024-08-23 17:32 | EnforcerOfTime ♦2 | Thank you for fixing this. I will re-add the buildings that were supposed to be included. | |
| 155401078 by SekeRob @ 2024-08-18 08:13 | 1 | 2024-08-23 10:24 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of "steps:both=separate" on an intersection node without any steps mapped nearby? |
| 2 | 2024-08-23 10:39 | SekeRob ♦1,433 | Misplaced and duly removed. | |
| 155523420 by Abdelkarim ouguinaz @ 2024-08-20 18:13 | 1 | 2024-08-21 09:17 | mueschel | Welcome to OSM!You added many tags that are not used by anybody else.In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your edito... |
| 155277382 by _mapto @ 2024-08-15 10:59 | 1 | 2024-08-17 14:51 | mueschel | Hi,does this shop really have two different vatin numbers? |
| 2 | 2024-08-19 07:44 | _mapto ♦5 | Hello, Yes they have. ref:vatin\t- is international identification see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref:vatin and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VAT_identification_numberref:cz:vatin - is czech identification see (you need use translator) https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identifika%C4... | |
| 3 | 2024-08-19 07:49 | mueschel | Alright.Could you change the (new) tag to ref:CZ:vatin? country codes usually use capital letters. | |
| 4 | 2024-08-19 09:08 | _mapto ♦5 | Done. Thank you for your notice about capital letter. | |
| 155336436 by germain2019 @ 2024-08-16 16:28 | 1 | 2024-08-17 07:52 | mueschel | Hi,it seems you accidentally uploaded a couple hundred objects without proper tags across the whole country. I'm going to remove them. |
| 155174901 by dmich9 @ 2024-08-13 03:14 | 1 | 2024-08-15 10:02 | mueschel | Please check your software - you added a couple thousand 'python = scripts/main.py' tags here. |
| 154986641 by Geo Dät @ 2024-08-08 16:05 | 1 | 2024-08-13 18:08 | mueschel | Schau hier bitte nochmal nach, mit "highway" Tag fährt es sich besser :) |
| 155003415 by Trần Thanh Tuấn @ 2024-08-09 03:42 | 1 | 2024-08-11 13:34 | mueschel | Hi,the tag "place:vi-class" is not used in any other place.I guess this is a local classification scheme for villages/hamlets?I suggest to use the tag "place:VI" - country codes use capital letters. The same scheme is already in use e.g. in China: https://wiki.openstreetm... |
| 2 | 2024-08-14 15:01 | Trần Thanh Tuấn ♦11 | Yeah, that was what I was aiming for. Thank you for pointing that out. | |
| 154137398 by OSM0 @ 2024-07-19 10:37 | 1 | 2024-08-10 10:55 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the access restrictions on this area? Currently this is a highway=pedestrian, that is not accessible for pedestrians. |
| 155041340 by lufticus @ 2024-08-09 21:33 | 1 | 2024-08-10 08:09 | mueschel | Hi,you used 10 new tags here to tag the years inscribed on this post. I would recommend combining them in one tag, separated by ';'.I'd also suggest to use a more generic tag here: There are other types of memorials remembering a certain day, which don't need to all have th... |
| 155002234 by Adilene Rmz @ 2024-08-09 02:03 | 1 | 2024-08-09 08:30 | mueschel | Reminder:You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.Let us know in case you need help! |
| 154825394 by philipcullen @ 2024-08-04 18:29 | 1 | 2024-08-08 10:02 | mueschel | Hi,please check the ref tag on this object:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8275821 |
| 2 | 2024-08-08 10:32 | philipcullen ♦8 | Good spot - that's now fixed | |
| 154941737 by joyceeemaeee @ 2024-08-07 15:28 | 1 | 2024-08-08 09:59 | mueschel | Hi,please check your recent edits. Something went very wrong here - the objects didn't get any proper tags, but just a large list of questions. |
| 154948019 by mueschel @ 2024-08-07 17:52 | 1 | 2024-08-08 04:47 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | This doesn't express there are only 50 and 80 possible. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/maxspeed:variable:values won't be nice if other roads use a smaller step with a larger range. |
| 2 | 2024-08-08 07:33 | mueschel | "maxspeed:variable:values" sounds like a good tag. It's definitely not an "interpolation". Even "interval" doesn't seem a good choice, because I doubt that all signs use values in regular intervals. | |
| 3 | 2024-08-08 09:15 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | Listing every number shouldn't be encouraged, and practiced. It's bad because imperial speed limits can use 5mph steps, causing an even longer list than metric 10km/h steps. That's described as the "majority" in USA, although the case studies hasn't mentioned yet. The `... | |
| 4 | 2024-08-08 09:34 | mueschel | We should list values only in exceptional cases, so having a long list is not really a problem. I'm pretty sure we'll find cases with no fixed step size. In that case we need to use :values and can't use :interpolation. E.g. a sign that shows 80,100,110 can't be described using :... | |
| 154763123 by paulbrunner @ 2024-08-03 08:05 | 1 | 2024-08-06 15:40 | mueschel | Hallo,sowohl 'hazard' als auch 'bicycle' werden in der Regel nicht mit left/right benutzt. Ich nehme an, du meinst, dass das Radfahren in einer Richtung gefährlich ist? Das wäre dann hazard:bicycle:forward. |
| 2 | 2024-08-08 06:41 | paulbrunner ♦59 | Hallo mueschel,danke für Deinen Hinweis. Ich hatte mich da eher noch das 'cycleway'-Tag im Kopf, welches ja mit left/right benutzt wird, sehe jetzt, dass 'hazard' forward/backward nutzt.Hab es grad angepasst:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154962475undhtt... | |
| 3 | 2024-08-08 07:36 | mueschel | > würde man dann bei hazard:bicycle:both_ways oder hazard:bicycle:both landen? Weder noch. Ganz einfach "hazard:bicycle". Vergleiche mit einem Tag wie maxspeed: Ohne Suffix gilt es in beiden Richtungen.left/right bezieht sich immer auf die Seiten eines Objekts (nicht mit de... | |
| 4 | 2024-08-08 19:10 | paulbrunner ♦59 | Ah, danke für die Info, dann stimmt es bereits so, wie ich bisher getaggt habe. | |
| 154812914 by pyrog @ 2024-08-04 13:33 | 1 | 2024-08-07 18:02 | mueschel | Hi,regarding the "harassment_prevention" tags, there's a discussion about something that seems very similar in the forums, in German.https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/schema-retreat-yes-fur-notinseln-kelly-inseln-renovieren/114170/12Maybe you could try to join that? |
| 154462746 by avenue-man @ 2024-07-26 22:15 | 1 | 2024-07-27 15:30 | mueschel | Could you please point us to the mandatory documentation of this import? There are many issues with the tagging scheme that should have been solved beforehand.E.g. these tags shouldn't be in OSM in their current form: Latitude = 40.805479 LinkNYC_Site_ID = mn-09-120409 Longit... |
| 2 | 2024-08-07 17:57 | mueschel | I reverted this import: Most of these nodes overlap with already existing POIs. | |
| 154897768 by Peter Bremer @ 2024-08-06 15:16 | 1 | 2024-08-07 08:18 | mueschel | Hallo,bitte checke mal die Autovervollständigung in deinem Editor. Seit einigen Tagen finde ich "sursurveillance" Tags (sind schon korrigiert). |
| 154675681 by pbrideau @ 2024-08-01 04:51 | 1 | 2024-08-02 08:41 | mueschel | Hi, you uploaded a few objects like this one with only foreign tags, could you check that?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304965538 |
| 2 | 2024-08-04 21:44 | pbrideau ♦4 | Sorry for the delay, I was out of town this weekend. I thought i cleaned up the bad tags, but I’ll recheck them this evening. Thanks | |
| 3 | 2024-08-05 00:33 | pbrideau ♦4 | I’ve recheck my last changesets (via changeset manager in JOSM) and did not found any other foreign tags. Either I’m not searching in the right place, or there is no more foreign tags. Thanks | |
| 4 | 2024-08-05 17:21 | mueschel | I already had a look yesterday and fixed the areas according to Bing images. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154809325#map=18/48.02245/-76.58320 | |
| 154809730 by mueschel @ 2024-08-04 12:17 | 1 | 2024-08-04 15:21 | JassKurn ♦153 | Hi Mueschel,In this changeset you delete a node that contained useful "information". The tagging was completely wrong, but the tagging not meet my definition of "spam". I believe the correct action would have been to fix the tagging, and inform the original editor of their bl... |
| 2 | 2024-08-04 15:22 | JassKurn ♦153 | I've reverted your changeset and I've fixed the tagging in changeset - 154816735 | |
| 3 | 2024-08-04 15:28 | mueschel | The business is for sure a legitimate one, but the way this data ended up in OSM is not. This was just one of several nodes with identical keys and style of tags, all from different new user accounts added within a day. This is just the typical behavior of SEO companies that dump data into OSM and g... | |
| 154749850 by olimago @ 2024-08-02 19:00 | 1 | 2024-08-04 12:25 | mueschel | Hi,could this node be tagged as 'retreat'?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:retreat |
| 154694111 by HABmaps @ 2024-08-01 13:22 | 1 | 2024-08-04 12:14 | mueschel | Hi,I don't understand the meaning of your "parking:right:upon_leaving" tag. Could you explain this in a bit more detail than in the description?Thank you! |
| 2 | 2025-05-13 13:16 | HABmaps ♦4 | Hi, the values were restored to parking:right lane; parking:left no | |
| 154714257 by ailed_melero @ 2024-08-01 23:57 | 1 | 2024-08-02 08:49 | mueschel | Reminder:You added many tags here that are not used in any other place. In OSM we have to use the tags that are defined in the wiki or available as presets in the editor - only these can be understood by other mappers and applications.Could you check the objects you edited and change the t... |
| 154497866 by Kleeschee @ 2024-07-27 19:44 | 1 | 2024-07-28 16:21 | mueschel | Hallo,du benutzt hier Tags, die es sonst nicht gibt, pond_system = damwater = damKannst du erklaeren, was du da erfasst hast, damit wir passende Tags finden koennen? |
| 2 | 2024-07-31 06:37 | Kleeschee ♦1 | Es handelt sich um einen (ehemals ca. 500 m langen) Damm oder Deich oder Staudamm am unteren Ende eines ehemaligen künstlichen Sees, der direkt am Dorfrand endete und heute noch auf über 300 m Länge noch sichtbar ist. | |
| 3 | 2024-07-31 17:08 | mueschel | So einen ehemaligen Damm kann man als Linie in OSM eintragen, mit dem Tag historic:waterway=damAlle anderen Tags sollten entfernt werden - heutzutage hat das Überbleibsel ja nichts mehr mit einem tatsächlich nutzbaren Damm zu tun. | |
| 154563616 by GrabID_MuhammadRafly @ 2024-07-29 13:39 | 1 | 2024-07-30 20:34 | mueschel | Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags. It's 'smoothness', not 'smothness' |
| 154385647 by whammo @ 2024-07-25 10:05 | 1 | 2024-07-30 20:30 | mueschel | Hi,please check the tags you added. "addr:street_address" is not used by anybody else. |
| 154477990 by Larmax @ 2024-07-27 11:14 | 1 | 2024-07-30 14:56 | mueschel | Hi,please check the name tag on this relation:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17879807 |
| 2 | 2024-07-30 19:09 | Larmax ♦267 | Hi,Fixed, thanks for pointing that out. | |
| 154500283 by DF45 @ 2024-07-27 21:25 | 1 | 2024-07-28 16:12 | mueschel | Hi,please watch out for the correct spelling of tags. I correct various spelling mistakes in your ref:FR:DREAL / seuil:FR:DREAL tags almost every day. |
| 2 | 2024-07-29 16:19 | DF45 ♦19 | Will reply by private mail | |
| 154466206 by ailed_melero @ 2024-07-27 02:32 | 1 | 2024-07-28 15:55 | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM!You added many tags here that are not used in any other place. In OSM we have to use the tags that are defined in the wiki or available as presets in the editor - only these can be understood by other mappers and applications.Could you check the objects you edited and change ... |
| 154417881 by Crsi @ 2024-07-26 02:00 | 1 | 2024-07-27 14:38 | mueschel | Hi,you added par and length information twice here. There's no need to adddisk_golf:length and disk_golf:par - the normal dist and par tags are fully sufficient. The context makes it clear that it's about disk golf. |
| 2 | 2024-07-27 23:47 | Crsi ♦25 | Hi mueschel. I am aware of that; I chose to use both tagging schemes in parallel because the wiki page said that there was no consensus about how this should be tagged. I opted to include both with the same data, so that potential consumers could use it regardless which of the two proposals they wou... | |
| 3 | 2024-07-28 15:36 | mueschel | I'd use only one of the two tagging schemes. It's quite obvious that there are two "competing" schemes to every data user - and if there really will be some consensus on tagging, changing the existing objects should not be a big problem. | |
| 4 | 2024-07-28 17:04 | Crsi ♦25 | Alright, I'll use the first scheme from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:disc_golf%3Dhole then, i.e. `par` and `dist` without prefix. | |
| 154449623 by Pieter Vander Vennet @ 2024-07-26 15:46 | 1 | 2024-07-27 15:06 | mueschel | Could you point us to the discussion and approval of this large-scale edit of tags? You invented a couple of new tags here, e.g. tyres:repair. What is wrong with the established tags like service:vehicle:tyres_repair? |
| 2 | 2024-07-27 16:16 | Pieter Vander Vennet ♦444 | Hi,There is no discussion as of now.Currently, the 'repair'-tagging is a mess. There were multiple wikipages, each indicating their own schema to indicate what is repaired where (namely "repair=yes|no|only", "repair=<item>" "<item>:repair=yes&q... | |
| 3 | 2024-07-27 16:24 | mueschel | service:vehicle:tyres and service:vehicle:tyres_repair are different things. Your edits produced many strange things, e.g. places that repair "oil" or "parts" and tags with spelling mistakes. Such a change needs proper planning, discussion and approval. | |
| 4 | 2024-07-27 16:32 | Pieter Vander Vennet ♦444 | I've made a proper forum post about this, I propose we take the discussion there. | |
| 154442292 by kitsee @ 2024-07-26 13:12 | 1 | 2024-07-27 15:15 | mueschel | Please check these objects. They all got a strange tag "srcName", that looks like it shouldn't be in OSM. |
| 2 | 2024-07-27 15:34 | kitsee ♦96 | ye sorry, I saw it while I was adding them but forgot to fix it before committing. i'll fix it asap. | |
| 154445738 by Pieter Vander Vennet @ 2024-07-26 14:23 | 1 | 2024-07-27 15:08 | mueschel | Hi,why did you delete the information that these shops repair Apple products? |
| 154399214 by DarioMonke @ 2024-07-25 15:07 | 1 | 2024-07-26 15:36 | mueschel | Hi,please check your recent edits - there are about 100 "raiway:signal:direction" instead of "railway:signal:direction" |
| 154402721 by mueschel @ 2024-07-25 16:29 | 1 | 2024-07-25 21:27 | g8o ♦4 | Hi, mir ist noch aufgefallen, dass es da bessere Tags gibt und wollte das korrigieren. Da war ich wohl zu langsam ... Aber wieso nicht authentication:bluetooth=yes? |
| 2 | 2024-07-26 07:07 | mueschel | Das kann man sicher ergänzen, aber der eigentlich entscheidende Punkt ist ja, dass man eine App braucht um die Maschine zu bedienen. Ob das dann im Hintergrund über Bluetooth oder Internet läuft ist ja zweitrangig. | |
| 154307062 by daaanna @ 2024-07-23 13:13 | 1 | 2024-07-24 19:21 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of "maxspeed:tracks"? Is this a misspelling of "trucks"? |
| 2 | 2024-08-02 19:26 | MR GIS ♦1 | Hello mueschel;Thank you for noticing that, I updated the tag to "maxspeed:hgv" according to the definition of Wiki OSM.RegardsM.R GIS | |
| 154325583 by emvee @ 2024-07-23 21:52 | 1 | 2024-07-24 16:37 | mueschel | Hi,could you check the city_limit signs like this one? They got a strange tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/47625044 |
| 154252483 by Dreyyy @ 2024-07-22 09:13 | 1 | 2024-07-23 09:34 | mueschel | Hi,this large area you uploaded doesn't have any valid tags. It also seems to be a copy of a boundary that is already in OSM. Could you check and fix this? |
| 154268953 by Tchana Badel @ 2024-07-22 15:30 | 1 | 2024-07-23 09:33 | mueschel | Hi,this large area you uploaded doesn't have any valid tags. Could you check and fix this? |
| 154161090 by TWHB @ 2024-07-19 22:30 | 1 | 2024-07-22 10:02 | mueschel | Hi,you used the new tag "fuel:jetA" here. Are you sure this is correct? Jet A fuel would be unusual, while fuel:JetA1 is the common type. |
| 154072694 by papaoscar @ 2024-07-17 19:29 | 1 | 2024-07-20 07:52 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/280759570You added a French "vehicule" tag. I wanted to fix that, but if we add "vehicle=private", the way will be closed to bicycles as well. I guess you meant "motor_vehicle=private"? |
| 2 | 2024-07-20 08:31 | papaoscar ♦1 | Hello mueschel This way can be used by bicycles.Only fishermen are allowed to use this way with a car.They have to request an authorisation. there is a barier and a placard explain this. so i was perplexed to find a good tag. | |
| 3 | 2024-07-20 08:35 | mueschel | Hi,that would be "motor_vehicle=private" or "motor_vehicle=permit".Usually we use 'permit' only if it's possible to get a permit easily for most people, but this doesn't seem to be the case here. | |
| 4 | 2024-07-20 08:44 | papaoscar ♦1 | Ok, I will correct this now | |
| 153257040 by pianoman24 @ 2024-06-27 16:58 | 1 | 2024-06-28 09:57 | mueschel | Hi,what's the meaning of the new 'stpauls' tag here? Is this some kind of official route? |
| 2 | 2024-07-16 00:39 | pianoman24 ♦1 | I added it to all the trails officially managed by St. Paul's. I found the "operator" tag later unfortunately and switched to that one. Do you know if there's a way to delete tags? | |
| 3 | 2024-07-19 10:03 | mueschel | Hi,you can delete tags in the same way you added them in your editor. However, I already changed all these tags to "operator". | |
| 153972189 by amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 @ 2024-07-15 13:16 | 1 | 2024-07-16 08:17 | mueschel | Hi Amanda,could you check your tags? "gentive" vs "genitive". |
| 2 | 2024-07-16 12:16 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 ♦363 | @mueschel Thanks for spotting that! I've fixed that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154012665I had considered making a preset for “logainm based name” stuff, and this sort of simple typo is a reason to do that! | |
| 153929216 by Dreamer1983 @ 2024-07-14 12:49 | 1 | 2024-07-15 13:45 | mueschel | Hallo,Ist dieser Bunker abgerissen oder nicht? Momentan ist beides getagged:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189330825 |
| 153925490 by liamGM @ 2024-07-14 11:06 | 1 | 2024-07-15 13:43 | mueschel | Hi,please check the tags you added here. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.Also, our database in case sensitive, all keys have to be in lower case (withvery few exceptions). Please have a look to t... |
| 2 | 2024-07-16 06:20 | liamGM ♦2 | Mueschel. tank you for taling the time to give feedback. I will move the data to the notes. | |
| 153936023 by EstherH @ 2024-07-14 15:43 | 1 | 2024-07-15 13:37 | mueschel | Hi,please check the tags on all the post boxes - it's "wikipedia", not "wikpedia" |
| 153899094 by Herwescheluc @ 2024-07-13 15:41 | 1 | 2024-07-14 08:10 | mueschel | Hallo,schau bitte mal nach den "parking:" Tags hier. Im Key darf kein "side" auftauchen - das muss ersetzt werden durch left / right / both. |
| 2 | 2024-07-14 09:16 | Herwescheluc ♦124 | Guten Morgen, mueschel!Da hab ich aber richtig gut geschlafen - Danke für's Aufwecken...Andreas | |
| 153875168 by AjBelnuovo @ 2024-07-12 23:30 | 1 | 2024-07-13 16:26 | mueschel | Hi,could you check the recycling here?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12050194130The recycling tags are not used in any other place. |
| 2 | 2024-07-14 14:04 | AjBelnuovo ♦108 | Não entendi o seu questionamento . É sobre as tags ou sobre o posicionamento ?https://www.atacadao.com.br/institucional/nossas-lojas | |
| 147493302 by yasslay @ 2024-02-15 14:03 | 1 | 2024-07-12 18:30 | mueschel | Hi,could you check the parking tags you added in this area? They are "parking:side:..." but the word "side" can't be in the proper tag - it needs to be replaced by left/right/both. |
| 2 | 2024-07-12 18:35 | yasslay ♦93 | Hi,Parking is disallowed on both sides of each carriageway; I’ll change it now. Thank you for the kind notice too; I didn’t know you needed to specify what side(s) of the carriageway have parking restrictions! | |
| 3 | 2024-07-12 18:37 | yasslay ♦93 | Sorry, but I’m on mobile right now and won’t have access to my PC for a few days and GO Map isn’t making it easy for me to change the tags. I’d really appreciate it if you could do the changes for me if possible. Thanks so much! | |
| 4 | 2024-07-12 18:42 | mueschel | Editing 34 ways without proper search and replace would be a nightmare... I changed all of them to "both". Enjoy Mapping! | |
| 5 | 2024-07-12 18:45 | yasslay ♦93 | Thanks so much! The ways I edited all had parking restrictions (no stopping) on both sides as far as I know so there shouldn’t be an issue. Enjoy mapping too! | |
| 153791714 by MappSurfer @ 2024-07-10 16:24 | 1 | 2024-07-11 12:17 | mueschel | Hallo,ich denke nicht dass es eine gute Idee ist, die gesperrten Routen mit 20 neuen Keys zu versehen, die sonst nirgends verwendet werden. Besser sollten sie mit den üblichen Tags wie "access" und "opening_hours" versehen werden um die Sperrung einzutragen.Auß... |
| 2 | 2024-07-12 10:32 | MappSurfer ♦31 | Hallo mueschelIch habe die Zugangsbeschränkungen nun direkt auf die Wege gesetzt und die Taggs der Wanderrouten-Relationen korrigiert. Die Wanderwege enthalten zwar immer noch 20 Taggs, aber nun offizielle. Die Änderungen findest du im folgenden Änderungssatz: https://www.openst... | |
| 3 | 2024-07-12 10:37 | mueschel | Hi,danke für's Ändern. So dürften damit die üblichen Router und Kartenanwendungen klarkommen. Die Zahl der Tags ist kein Problem, nur der Fakt, dass keine Software in der Lage ist neue Keys automatisch zu erkennen und auszuwerten. | |
| 153801015 by Hungerburg @ 2024-07-10 21:55 | 1 | 2024-07-12 09:08 | mueschel | Hallowas heißt denn "crowning"? Das Tag wird nirgends sonst benutzt. |
| 2 | 2024-07-12 09:26 | Hungerburg ♦409 | Hallo Mueschel, der Weg ist stark bombiert. Da bilden sich dann nicht so schnell Schlaglöcher. Wenn neu gebaut wird fast nur mehr so.Englischer Ausdruck von hier https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/surface-fine-gravel-is-it-for-loose-gravel-or-duplicate-of-surface-compacted/7533/77 | |
| 153779837 by Minimalis @ 2024-07-10 11:28 | 1 | 2024-07-12 09:01 | mueschel | Hi,could you check these edits? There are a couple of ways like this one without valid tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1300501191 |
| 153831804 by Fachgruppe Mobilitätsmanagement @ 2024-07-11 22:39 | 1 | 2024-07-12 08:42 | mueschel | Erinnerung:Hallo,bitte schaut nach den parking-Tags die hier in der Gegend hinzugefügt wurden. Viele sind "parking:side:..." - "side" darf aber nicht im Tag auftauchen und muss durch left/right/both ersetzt werden. |
| 153769209 by jengelh @ 2024-07-10 06:26 | 1 | 2024-07-12 08:39 | mueschel | Hi,schau bitte mal nach den socket-Tags. Du hast J3105-1 dokumentiert (wurde auch schon 1x verwendet), hast hier aber j3105-1 getagged. Ich bin für die Version mit Kleinbuchstabe. |
| 2 | 2024-07-12 12:30 | jengelh ♦116 | yo, easy | |
| 153738195 by Mb_651 @ 2024-07-09 10:23 | 1 | 2024-07-10 17:16 | mueschel | Hallo,bitte schau nochmal nach den parking-Tags. Einige sind "parking:side:..." - "side" darf aber nicht im Tag auftauchen und muss durch left/right/both ersetzt werden. |
| 2 | 2024-07-10 17:42 | Mb_651 ♦35 | Danke für den Hinweis.Bin nochmal mit Overpass drüber gegangen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153794312In der Altstadt soll eine nicht besonders gut ausgeschilderte Parkverbotszone beschrieben werden, während in der Krankenhausstraße die Note(https://www.openstreet... | |
| 3 | 2024-07-10 20:03 | mueschel | Das conditional ist genau richtig.Ein Verbot im conditional zu überschreiben und aufzuheben geht mit "no" oder "none". | |
| 4 | 2024-07-10 20:07 | Mb_651 ♦35 | Danke | |
| 153761791 by Adilene Rmz @ 2024-07-09 22:03 | 1 | 2024-07-10 17:26 | mueschel | Welcome to OSM!You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.Let us know in case you need help... |
| 153745120 by mueschel @ 2024-07-09 13:32 | 1 | 2024-07-09 16:49 | dmfr ♦53 | This changeset is wrong, because it joins departures, departures_1 and departures_2 using a comma (,) instead of a semicolon (;).I'd also like you to indicate where this syntax "06:30-19:30/60" is documented. I understand it is supposed to mean "between 06:30 and 19:30, every... |
| 2 | 2024-07-09 17:13 | mueschel | Hi,You can check this with the evaluation tool:https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Mo-Fr%2006%3A00%2C06%3A50%2C08%3A05%2C09%3A15%2C10%3A05%2C10%3A35%2C11%3A15%2C11%3A55%2C13%3A15%2C13%3A55%2C14%3A35%2C15%3A15%2C15%3A55%2C16%3A35%2C17%3A15%2C17%3A55%2C18%3A35%2C%20Sa-Su%2CPH%20... | |
| 3 | 2024-07-09 17:50 | dmfr ♦53 | Thank you. I'm also clarified with respect to the format.By the way, are you detecting these issues automatically, or...? | |
| 4 | 2024-07-09 18:20 | mueschel | I use Taginfo to create a list of new keys - many of these are spelling mistakes. And it happens that here we got the first and only "departures_2" in the database.https://osm.janmichel.eu/taginfo/newkeys.htm | |
| 5 | 2024-07-09 19:18 | dmfr ♦53 | Ah nice, that's good to know :) | |
| 153713086 by Fachgruppe Mobilitätsmanagement @ 2024-07-08 17:19 | 1 | 2024-07-09 10:47 | mueschel | Hallo,bitte schaut nach den parking-Tags die hier in der Gegend hinzugefügt wurden. Viele sind "parking:side:..." - "side" darf aber nicht im Tag auftauchen und muss durch left/right/both ersetzt werden. |
| 153586117 by epb_CD93 @ 2024-07-05 12:08 | 1 | 2024-07-06 15:07 | mueschel | Hi,the opening/closing tags you used on the bridge here are not used in other places. There's the "opening_hours" tag for this kind of information. But I'm unsure how to convert it. Is "opening_date" the day the bridge opens or the day the cycleway opens? |
| 2 | 2024-07-08 08:18 | epb_CD93 ♦2 | Hi, this is a temporary floating bridge for the Olympics open for cyclists and pedestrians from 24/07 to 12/08 and from 28/08 to 10/09. The bridge will not be in place before and after these dates. Since these tags are uncommun, perhaps it's best to simply add a comment to mention operating da... | |
| 3 | 2024-07-08 08:27 | mueschel | Thanks for the explanation! On top of your edit I also added opening hours and access tags to mark the relevant period. | |
| 153658280 by CUSPC @ 2024-07-07 11:41 | 1 | 2024-07-08 08:21 | mueschel | Hi,please check the nodes you added. There are two like this one without any valid tag:12039826176 |
| 153617070 by mueschel @ 2024-07-06 10:01 | 1 | 2024-07-06 14:19 | Margoulinot ♦13 | Hello, could you explain your change ? I think it's better to introduce :double or :simple... as suffix because most hotels have different types of room so we can't use only one key. And multiple values are dirty |
| 2 | 2024-07-06 14:26 | mueschel | You asked about this last week in the forums. Kovoschiz gave a long explanation how a single "charge" tag is the common way and too detailed price information on hotels is not wanted (check also all the up votes those posts got!). | |
| 3 | 2024-07-06 23:09 | Margoulinot ♦13 | Hello, thanks for your reply. I think most people agreed that the :conditional scheme was too complicated for this case and I dropped it. I could also defend that the prices moving on a daily basis was a western-centric approach. After that nobody voted for Kovoschiz answer on "/double" ra... | |
| 4 | 2024-07-06 23:31 | Margoulinot ♦13 | Hi again @mueschel, I posted again here : https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/complex-hotel-price-charge-or-charge-conditional/115275/9 | |
| 5 | 2024-07-07 05:40 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | Lack of reacts doesn't mean one part of a comment is good or bad. I described many issues, with my opinions. Others don't have to agree with all of them. "However, this does not mean "feel free to ignore existing tagging schemes " https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_t... | |
| 6 | 2024-07-07 10:48 | Margoulinot ♦13 | I read that part too ;) but... there are no existing tagging schemes as evidenced by the void of the documentation on the topic and the erratic practices. I was not convinced by the /double argument so I thought it was one voice against one voice. But I understand there's kind of hierarchy betw... | |
| 7 | 2024-07-07 10:59 | mueschel | That's not about hierarchy between contributors, but hierarchy between tags: Major tags vs. minor information: Semicolons are bad in major tags (e.g. building or amenity), but are very well suited for minor and diverse additional information.Existing tags vs. new tags:The specificati... | |
| 153556699 by Morneo @ 2024-07-04 16:58 | 1 | 2024-07-05 16:55 | mueschel | Hi,schau doch bitte nochmal nach deinen maxweight Tags: maxweight:lanes:conditional:backward = none|none @ (bus;destination)1) Die übliche Reihenfolge im Key istmaxweight:lanes:backward:conditional.1a) "lanes" ist nicht nötig, der Wert ist ja überall derselbe... |
| 2 | 2024-07-07 17:00 | Morneo ♦11 | Moin mueschel,ist korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis. | |
| 153445561 by adreamy @ 2024-07-02 09:08 | 1 | 2024-07-05 08:42 | mueschel | Hi,I found the tag "playing=field" on some ways. Could you explain what this means? |
| 2 | 2024-07-05 09:54 | adreamy ♦56 | Thanks for letting us know.It looks like I got the wrong memory cache value when I copied and pasted the tag.(I never intentionally use tags like that, and I don't even know what they mean).I'll make sure to correct that.Thanks. | |
| 3 | 2024-07-05 10:06 | mueschel | That happens to many people. In this case it could have been something akin to a training area so I had to ask. | |
| 153440266 by Mat_Carto @ 2024-07-02 06:56 | 1 | 2024-07-05 08:04 | mueschel | Hi,please check the tags you added recently, there are several spelling mistakes, e.g.date_visitedate_vistedate_vistieThey all should be "check_date" or "survey:date".You also use "light_source" which should be "lit". |
| 153357742 by ChristianA @ 2024-06-30 07:38 | 1 | 2024-07-04 16:43 | mueschel | Hi,could you check your recent edits? There are two dozen objects with a "BETECKNING" tag which looks like it shouldn't be there. |
| 153387228 by bielebog @ 2024-06-30 21:57 | 1 | 2024-07-03 15:28 | mueschel | Hi,could you check the charging stations? Two got a strange "hpv" tag, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12023708927 |
| 2 | 2024-07-03 18:33 | bielebog ♦268 | These are charging stations forlocal transport DOT busses. That's psv, not hpv, of course. Thanks for noticing. Changed it to psv=only now. Or would access=psv be more suitable? | |
| 3 | 2024-07-03 20:25 | mueschel | access=psv is not an official tag.psv=only is correct, but includes other public transport vehicles.Here bus=only should be correct.Do you know which charging system they use? Maybe we can add a socket tag as well. | |
| 153222441 by adas @ 2024-06-26 22:01 | 1 | 2024-06-27 17:55 | mueschel | Hi,could you check your recent edits? I found 8 large areas with only four foreign tags that seem to be duplicates of boundaries that already exist in OSM. |
| 2 | 2024-06-28 21:21 | adas ♦77 | Probably I fixed it. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-30 10:10 | mueschel | The objects are still there. E.g. thishttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296471451is a duplicate ofhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268974492 | |
| 153261047 by ProjetoMapeia @ 2024-06-27 18:36 | 1 | 2024-06-29 09:25 | mueschel | Hi,please check this way, something went wrong with the maxspeed:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296698003 |
| 153247685 by pfg21 @ 2024-06-27 13:19 | 1 | 2024-06-29 09:10 | mueschel | hi,could you check this way, it got a strange 'rugns' tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362725847 |
| 2 | 2024-07-01 08:05 | pfg21 ♦128 | Thanks, I got the letter sequence wrong :)https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:rungs | |
| 153242149 by no_secret @ 2024-06-27 11:02 | 1 | 2024-06-28 08:45 | mueschel | Hallo,bitte schau mal nach den "socket" Tags. Ein "socket:ccs" gibt es nicht:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket:* |
| 2 | 2024-07-01 05:46 | no_secret ♦4 | Hallo!Entschuldige bitte, das hatte ich übersehen. Ich werde es gleich richtigstellen. | |
| 153206398 by Stretch Longfellow @ 2024-06-26 14:34 | 1 | 2024-06-27 10:23 | mueschel | Hi,please have a look at the destination signs: The destinations are tagged (counterintuitively) using "direction_south", not "destination_south" |
| 2 | 2024-06-27 15:21 | Stretch Longfellow ♦92 | Yep, read that on the wiki and then used destination out of habit. Thanks for catching that! I'll fix it now. | |
| 153179542 by ClarSco @ 2024-06-26 00:37 | 1 | 2024-06-27 09:37 | mueschel | Hi,could you check your naptan tags? e.g. it's "naptan:AtcoCode", not "naptan:ATCOCode" |
| 2 | 2024-06-27 14:04 | ClarSco ♦1 | Cheers, hadn't realised that the key was case sensitive. Should be fixed now. | |
| 153136028 by JassKurn @ 2024-06-25 02:53 | 1 | 2024-06-27 09:26 | mueschel | Hi,what does the tag "RoW=yes" mean? It's not used in other places. |
| 2 | 2024-06-27 12:59 | JassKurn ♦153 | I can't remember why I added this specific tag on node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12008703519I do know I've thought several times there needs to be a way to tag the fact guideposts are specifically for "Public Rights of Way" or PRoW.But, with that said I do no... | |
| 152645679 by mueschel @ 2024-06-13 18:31 | 1 | 2024-06-25 15:12 | adiatmad ♦446 | Hello mueschel, would you mind explaining how to detect this descriptive name?(https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/cleanup-of-name-fields-describing-buildings/99591/37) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152645679 |
| 2 | 2024-06-25 19:18 | mueschel | The easiest way is to search for the tag on Taginfo and then use the "Overpass Turbo" link.https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=Rumah#overview | |
| 3 | 2024-06-26 04:02 | adiatmad ♦446 | I removed that tag (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=153182571). Thanks, mueschel! | |
| 153080931 by Gunnar Sannerud @ 2024-06-23 18:32 | 1 | 2024-06-25 10:01 | mueschel | Hi,could you check the historic objects you added recently? They all have 4 strange tags that look like they shouldn't be in OSM.attribution note ID ruin souce ID |
| 153122611 by ChMenges @ 2024-06-24 17:16 | 1 | 2024-06-25 08:34 | mueschel | Hallo,bitte schau mal nach der richtigen Schreibweise von Tags. Ich sehe hier unter anderem class bicycle\tclass-bicycleclass_bicycel\tclass_bicycle\tclass_bycycle |
| 153053780 by Laila Fatma @ 2024-06-23 05:56 | 1 | 2024-06-24 09:51 | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM.You uploaded a large number of short streets on top of existing ones. When editing, please make sure that you always change the old objects and don't add new ones additionally. |
| 152944082 by surbhat @ 2024-06-20 12:48 | 1 | 2024-06-21 06:27 | BCNorwich ♦4,851 | Hi, There are lots of duplicated sections of highways across the airport. Please see here:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=72.62122&lat=23.07271&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areasCoul... |
| 2 | 2024-06-21 07:35 | mueschel | This import also created many objects without any valid tags and with tags that should not appear in OSM, e.g. http://osm.org/way/1293588436IMO this import should be reverted and can be done properly again, based on our import rules:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines | |
| 152363932 by mueschel @ 2024-06-07 08:24 | 1 | 2024-06-17 16:34 | MxxCon ♦3,359 | In my opinion tiger:* tags shouldn't be added or updated at all. They are leftovers of a decade old streets import and are not used for anything else. If anything, they should be deleted... --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1523639... |
| 2 | 2024-06-17 17:26 | mueschel | Hi,the tags were added in another changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152313131 | |
| 152716729 by Sai Dev Pappu @ 2024-06-15 11:26 | 1 | 2024-06-16 09:59 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain what "allowance = Private" means? This tag isn't used in any other place yet. |
| 2 | 2024-06-16 10:23 | Sai Dev Pappu ♦1 | I created it by mistake, sorry for it. i thought "access=permissive" = " allowance = Private". I modified now. Thanks for showing me that | |
| 152739666 by 1998alexkane @ 2024-06-15 21:53 | 1 | 2024-06-16 09:23 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain what a "sport_shuttle" is? This tag isn't used in any other place yet. |
| 2 | 2024-06-16 14:11 | 1998alexkane ♦87 | Hi, I meant that the offer a bus shuttle to local sports games. It's a service offered by many bars, at least in Milwaukee. I don't believe there is an existing tagging scheme for this service. | |
| 152630327 by Engineer0088397 @ 2024-06-13 11:55 Active block | 1 | 2024-06-15 10:37 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain the meaning of the tag "lane driving =Right"? Do you really drive on the right hand side of the road here? |
| 152654984 by Shoorick @ 2024-06-14 01:36 | 1 | 2024-06-15 08:50 | mueschel | Hi,please don't add hundreds of Wikipedia tags to one single object.It's fully sufficient to have ONE link to Wikipedia per object. Wikipedia itself has a great directory linking the individual language pages with each other. There is no need to misuse the OSM database as a secondary, ... |
| 2 | 2024-06-15 13:42 | Shoorick ♦30 | OK, got it. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-23 23:16 | Shoorick ♦30 | Partially reverted in https://osm.org/changeset/153088684 — unnecessary `wikipedia:*` tags was removed from Batumi and settlements near it. | |
| 152425486 by mueschel @ 2024-06-08 17:43 | 1 | 2024-06-09 04:55 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | We have double "parking"/stopping restrictions here. The double solid yellow is marked between the parking bay and the travel lane. This question has been asked in eg https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Street_parking#no_parking_on_lane_scheme_problem The forum post doesn't a... |
| 2 | 2024-06-09 04:56 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | So it's not based on a legal default that shouldn't be added. We clearly distinguish whether stopping is allowed outside parking bays here. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-09 08:18 | mueschel | Hi,this intention wasn't clear to me from the tags. It rather looked like the leftovers from some older tagging of someone not familiar with the use of parking tags.There was a question about something similar a few weeks ago: parking in marked areas allowed, but stopping in unmarked area... | |
| 4 | 2024-06-09 14:47 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | If you mean the regional post, sorry I don't read German, so I didn't notice it https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/parken-in-gekennzeichneten-flachen-erlaubt/113946/ From translation, I don't see how `parking:*:restriction:conditional=`can co-exist with `parking:*:restriction` ni... | |
| 5 | 2024-06-09 17:23 | mueschel | This seems to get too complicated for a changeset discussion. Let's continue in the forums (but not today).I think ':lanes' is the wrong concept here. We're not tagging a lane-dependent property as the ':lanes' Suffix suggests.Isn't the fitting terminology &q... | |
| 6 | 2024-06-10 10:29 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | We can sort out our differences and clarify the opposing views first, before presenting to the global audience to decide https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Kovposch#Double_"parking" | |
| 152403950 by mueschel @ 2024-06-08 08:36 | 1 | 2024-06-08 08:50 | StefanHRT ♦403 | Hey, das sollte bestimmt statt "is_sidewalk" "is_sidepath" heissen, damit das straßenbegleitende zu erkennen ist. ;)VG Stefan |
| 2 | 2024-06-08 09:05 | mueschel | Das kann gut sein. Allerdings gibt es genau dafür das wesentlich häufiger benutzte und älterehighway=footwayfootway=sidewalk bzw hier, wo es als path getaggt isthighway=pathpath=sidewalk | |
| 3 | 2024-06-08 11:38 | StefanHRT ♦403 | Ist richtig, der andere Tag hat was mit mit der Verkehrswendegruppe zu tun. Kann ja mal Tordans Bedcheid geben damit er dies aufklärt 😉 | |
| 152387377 by mueschel @ 2024-06-07 17:52 | 1 | 2024-06-07 19:25 | flex16 ♦34 | Why did you change it? |
| 2 | 2024-06-07 19:41 | flex16 ♦34 | Bzw Warum hast du es geändert falls du Deutsch kannst | |
| 3 | 2024-06-07 19:49 | flex16 ♦34 | Ah ok ich verstehe es jetzt. Ich hab nur deinen Rechtschreibfehler nicht verstanden. | |
| 4 | 2024-06-07 21:08 | mueschel | Leider benutzen post_office und parcel_locker unterschiedliche Keys für die angebotenen Services. Das wollte ich korrigieren...Danke für's fixen von meinem Tippfehler! | |
| 152307179 by b-unicycling @ 2024-06-05 22:51 | 1 | 2024-06-06 17:18 | mueschel | Hi,you added some "moved:from" among the "moved_from". Can these be changed to _ ? I wonder if there are no better keys, similar to "origin" on shops. |
| 2 | 2024-06-07 11:02 | b-unicycling ♦242 | THanks for notifing me. "Origin" is not a good key, because in many cases, the stones have been "moved from" a location where they had already been re-used or exhibited which was not their original location. I've changed them all to "moved_from", though. | |
| 152306577 by magol @ 2024-06-05 22:15 | 1 | 2024-06-06 09:24 | mueschel | Hi,you added some parking tags here, but used the outdated tagging scheme. There was a new revision last year:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking |
| 152208019 by Pieter Vander Vennet @ 2024-06-03 16:31 | 1 | 2024-06-04 18:00 | mueschel | Hi,it's not common to add arbitrary strings (here: bicycle_tube) to keys.The charge key can take multiple values for different use cases / items:charge= 1 EUR/bicycle_tube; 2 EUR/brake_pad |
| 2 | 2024-06-05 13:14 | Pieter Vander Vennet ♦444 | Hmm, right, that is indeed a better scheme... | |
| 3 | 2024-06-05 14:14 | Pieter Vander Vennet ♦444 | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152289112 | |
| 151869560 by Hendrikklaas @ 2024-05-26 20:45 Active block | 1 | 2024-05-28 11:57 | mueschel | Hi,you added a "ruine" tag here - by mistake or on purpose? |
| 2 | 2024-06-02 20:58 | LookAtThese_1 ♦1 | I think it was by purpose because te garage is since a few days closed because the road slopes have fallen down | |
| 3 | 2024-06-03 08:38 | mueschel | So, the building is fine, but can't be used because the entrance road isn't usable? I.e. if this is will be blocked for a longer time access=no on the building and the road should be fine for the moment. | |
| 4 | 2024-06-06 08:54 | eggie ♦40,702 | Dag hendrikklaasruine=yes heb ik verwijderd. Dat is geen valide tag.We kennen wel historic=ruins, maar dat is hier niet aan de orde.Ik heb de parking voorlopig op disused:amenity=parking gezet. Zal nog wel even duren.MVGeggie | |
| 152101994 by MGR73 @ 2024-06-01 00:05 | 1 | 2024-06-01 09:17 | mueschel | Hi,the tag "skill rating=most difficult" is not used in any other place. Could you check the documentation of "sac_scale" or "mtb:scale" and see if these can be applied? |
| 152072953 by mueschel @ 2024-05-31 10:09 | 1 | 2024-06-01 08:01 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | This is obviously not a `traffic_sign=` |
| 2 | 2024-06-01 08:02 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | I'm transitioning from `road_marking=` to `road_marking:id=` as words are predominant in `road_marking=` | |
| 3 | 2024-06-01 08:13 | mueschel | I think 'traffic_sign' is totally correct here. In most legislatures "traffic signs" are not only the metal plates on poles, but any type of road marking are defined in the same part of law and also named traffic signs. I'd suggest to use 'traffic_sign' and in ... | |
| 4 | 2024-06-01 08:39 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | 1. The common language connotation is preferable over some legal interpretation. Despite being titled "Traffic Sign" , Vienna Convention is still split into chapters of "Traffic Sign" and "Road Marking". Under TSRGD, UK's Traffic Signs Manual still mentions "... | |
| 5 | 2024-06-01 08:47 | mueschel | I can only repeat what I wrote several times: Please don't invent new tags without documentation and discussion. This just makes the data inaccessible for anyone else who is not a human manually reading the tags on an object. | |
| 6 | 2024-06-01 08:49 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | Fundamentally, in this direction of thinking, `road_marking=` could still be treated as a combination under some hypothetical `traffic_sign:*=road_marking` ... Similar to the possibility of "signs" being fixed plates, flip-flap, or LED display, markings can be paint, surfacing (bricks) ,... | |
| 7 | 2024-06-01 08:51 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | Should the use of `traffic_sign=` be redefined to include markings? I have only seen you suggest this now. Diluting it still pollutes the data. | |
| 8 | 2024-06-01 08:56 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | The application and rendering of signs is completely different from markings. Mixing them in `traffic_sign=` directly causes a mess (including to applications using them now), and requires more processing to identify whether they are panels or markings. | |
| 9 | 2024-06-01 08:58 | mueschel | Nothing new to suggest or define here, that's an established use case, even supported by common presets in JOSM. See e.g.https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/traffic_sign=DE%253A298https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/traffic_sign=DE%253A293 | |
| 10 | 2024-06-01 09:14 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | And where is this documented or discussed? On the contrary, markings were stilll discussed around that proposal https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/large-scale-change-of-traffic-sign-to-traffic-sign-id/107508/61 `=GB:1003A` doesn't have that many more `traffic_sign=` than `road_marking=`... | |
| 11 | 2024-06-01 09:21 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | I believe `traffic_sign=none` was discussed to mean no plates, but there can be markings https://community-cdn.openstreetmap.org/uploads/default/original/2X/c/cec22899d55dead5714839e00eb430e9f6f92037.jpeg https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/fahrradinfrastruktur-tagging-realitat-und-fragen/8417 | |
| 152095010 by illika @ 2024-05-31 19:02 | 1 | 2024-06-01 08:33 | mueschel | Hi,welcome to OSM.You dumped a huge amount of text on a dozen bus stop POIs. Please make sure that you only use proper tags as defined in your editor or the OSM Wiki. This is absolutely necessary to make the information usable by anybody else. Please also read the guidelines for imports of data:... |
| 152034072 by mueschel @ 2024-05-30 12:53 | 1 | 2024-05-30 14:08 | aixbrick ♦840 | Hallo,ich hatte bewusst auf das Präfix "post_office:" verzichtet, weil ich annahm, dass das nur genutzt wird, wenn es sich um eine Postfiliale im Einzelhandel handelt (Haupttag ist also z.B. "shop"), um deutlich zu machen worauf sich "service_provider" bezieht. B... |
| 2 | 2024-05-30 14:22 | mueschel | Hi,es hat mich auch gewundert, aber "service_provider" wird tatsächlich bisher nirgends verwendet. post_office:service_provider zusammen mit amenity=post_office hingegen schon 140 Mal. Deswegen auch die Änderung - ansonsten bin ich aber auch eher der Meinung das Präfix... | |
| 135402166 by Jörg Roßdeutscher @ 2023-04-26 20:48 | 1 | 2024-05-30 13:34 | mueschel | Hallo,hast du die genauen Beschränkungen von diesem Parkplatz? Ich wollte die Tags auf das aktuelle Schema umstellen, werde aber nicht ganz schlau draus.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225540784/history |
| 2 | 2024-05-30 13:45 | Jörg Roßdeutscher ♦14 | Hallo, leider nein, die ganzen Details sind ja nicht von mir, ich habe glaub'ich bloß im Vorbeischlendern im Urlaub ein paar Details ergänzt.Ich wohne da auch nicht.Hast Du eine konkrete Frage, evtl. erinnere ich mich dann ja doch an irgendwas? | |
| 151954993 by macdale @ 2024-05-28 17:02 | 1 | 2024-05-30 12:52 | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way, it got a strange tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287449797 |
| 2 | 2024-05-30 13:09 | macdale ♦51 | Thanks for you comment. It's fixed. | |
| 151872730 by Jacques TCHAKADA @ 2024-05-26 23:25 | 1 | 2024-05-28 11:53 | mueschel | Hi,could you explain what this area represents? Right now it doesn't have any valid tags. |
| 151883877 by Kimberley H Bagley @ 2024-05-27 07:37 | 1 | 2024-05-28 11:40 | mueschel | Hallo,du hast hier viele neue, nummerierte Tags wie mapillary:8 erfunden. Das ist nicht nötig. Mehrere Mapillary-Bilder können (und sollten) in einem einzelnen "mapillary" Tag erfasst werden, getrennt mit Semikola. |
| 2 | 2024-05-28 12:03 | Kimberley H Bagley ♦3 | Das habe ich nicht erfunden, dass ist, warum auch immer, so wie es MapComplete macht 🤷♀️ | |
| 3 | 2024-05-28 12:07 | Kimberley H Bagley ♦3 | Und wenn ich's über iD gemacht hätte, dann hätte ich es wahrscheinlich mit Semikolon getrennt | |
| 151870137 by brysonk911 @ 2024-05-26 21:05 | 1 | 2024-05-27 09:38 | mueschel | Something went wrong here, all these objects don't have any valid tag.The changeset is also missing the mandatory documentation of any import, seehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 2 | 2024-05-27 19:30 | brysonk911 ♦1 | Thanks, Ill work on this. | |
| 78873639 by Bernard59118 @ 2019-12-26 09:34 | 1 | 2024-05-26 09:06 | mueschel | Hi,I found a strange "opening_hours:parking" on this pitch. Does that really mean you can park here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36997839 |
| 151780410 by PatrickEk @ 2024-05-24 17:01 | 1 | 2024-05-25 13:27 | mueschel | Hi,please check these buildings, they all got some strange "|ODS" tags. |
| 151712101 by pebhavy @ 2024-05-23 09:05 | 1 | 2024-05-24 17:28 | mueschel | Hi,you added strange 'mv' tags across the world. Please check and fix. |
| 2 | 2024-05-28 16:47 | pachpora ♦17 | Hi,Thank you for reviewing the changeset and highlighting the incorrect edit made by our editor, we use MV=No tag as a part of our internal SOP's and by mistake it has been added to the public osm. We have provided feedback to the editor and reverted all the incorrect changes made by editor, ... | |
| 151668824 by FA-KW @ 2024-05-22 10:37 | 1 | 2024-05-24 09:03 | mueschel | Hallo,solche POIs, die garantiert nicht wieder in derselben Form existieren werden können auch einfach gelöscht werden anstelle sie als "removed" zu markieren - in der Historie sind sie weiterhin vorhanden falls sich jemand jemals dafür interessieren sollte. |
| 151612013 by NKA @ 2024-05-21 06:48 | 1 | 2024-05-22 17:27 | mueschel | Hi,there are some hundred ELVIS, REVERSED and RIVERSPLIT tags that made it through your import routine. |
| 2 | 2024-05-22 18:12 | NKA ♦247 | Thanks, fixed. | |
| 151630714 by mueschel @ 2024-05-21 14:06 | 1 | 2024-05-22 02:09 | Johnny Carlsen ♦94 | Hi,A quick explanation. I'm adding house numbers to OSM every day for about an hour or two. Recently I was told I have 10 days to move out from my current rental place and find a new place.While I am adding house numbers, it was easy for me to quickly call the numbers and find the price... |
| 2 | 2024-05-22 02:33 | Johnny Carlsen ♦94 | I have re-added the address, did you remove any other addresses? | |
| 3 | 2024-05-22 08:11 | mueschel | Hi,I'm pretty sure I checked and saw that the address itself was already mapped. But maybe I misread one of the other ones. It was not my intention to delete valid house numbers. | |
| 4 | 2024-05-22 09:02 | Johnny Carlsen ♦94 | No problem, mistakes happen. | |
| 151560943 by DENelson83 @ 2024-05-20 05:40 | 1 | 2024-05-21 13:43 | mueschel | Hi,you added 'mmsi' and 'mmsii' tags here. These are not yet used in other places. However, there are many "seamark:radio_station:mmsi". Would it be possible to use this tag? |
| 2 | 2024-05-21 15:17 | DENelson83 ♦95 | Go for it. | |
| 146776083 by OttoR @ 2024-01-28 12:17 | 1 | 2024-05-21 12:40 | mueschel | Hi,could you check the parking on this way? Is it street_side or lane?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7369454 |
| 2 | 2024-05-22 08:59 | OttoR ♦59 | lane | |
| 151475708 by emeadows @ 2024-05-18 01:07 | 1 | 2024-05-19 10:02 | mueschel | Hi,these ways got a large amount of tags that look like they shouldn't be in OSM. Could you check that? This import is also missing the source of the data. |
| 2 | 2024-05-19 15:59 | emeadows ♦1 | Thanks mueshel. This was the first time I used JOSM to load shapefiles up to OSM. I wrongly assumed OSM would strip unneeded fields from the files. We'll be updating this area a lot since there are several more trails than what's showing. Now that I know what OSM needs and what it doesn�... | |
| 3 | 2024-05-20 08:21 | mueschel | I removed those tags. | |
| 151532518 by mueschel @ 2024-05-19 12:39 | 1 | 2024-05-19 13:15 | Pink Duck ♦151 | Twitter.com changed to X.com on Friday. Twitter is dead, the key should be too. |
| 2 | 2024-05-19 13:20 | mueschel | If you want to propose to change the tag and / or do a mechanical edit to change the 75,000 occurrences of twitter tags please feel free to do so. Until this is approved, we should stay with the established and documented tag. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-19 13:24 | Pink Duck ♦151 | Disagree. Users should be free to tag whatever they want for new features. Now is clearly the time to switch to the correct brand name suffix. However, the Twitter.com redirect is only 302 Found for the moment. Once that becomes Permanent might be the time to do a mechanical edit. | |
| 4 | 2024-05-19 13:27 | mueschel | You are free to tag whatever you want, but don't expect any tag to be understood by fellow mappers and to be shown in any application unless it is documented and approved. | |
| 151491858 by Lusambno Davison @ 2024-05-18 12:33 | 1 | 2024-05-19 12:07 | mueschel | I reverted this changeset. You mapped the shadows of clouds on Bing images. |
| 151473965 by Tallguy @ 2024-05-17 22:49 | 1 | 2024-05-18 09:07 | mueschel | Hi,I just fixed several "maxwidth_physical" tags. The common spelling is with a colon: "maxwidth:physical". |
| 2 | 2024-05-18 11:16 | Tallguy ♦22 | Thanks for that - not sure how I ended up using the wrong key. I'll do a search and change to the correct one. Probably be able to do it Sunday evening. | |
| 151359969 by Getpin_Com @ 2024-05-15 12:59 | 1 | 2024-05-16 12:23 | mueschel | Hi,it seems you're doing a large scale import of shop nodes?There are several tags that need to be edited:- 'description' with a long advertisement text - the description tag is not meant for that, it should be used to describe the specific POIs only.- 'contact_face... |
| 151361819 by Evgeniya_rocketdata @ 2024-05-15 13:37 | 1 | 2024-05-16 09:19 | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag 'tiktok' here. This is not used in other places. Could you change this to the common 'contact:tiktok' tag? |
| 2 | 2024-10-13 14:45 | Dimitar155 ♦658 | Hey Evgeniya,In this changeset you've added a few dozen `not:brand:wikidata` tags which match the values of `brand:wikidata`. Can you fix it?Happy mapping,Dimitar | |
| 3 | 2024-12-18 16:15 | Dimitar155 ♦658 | Hey Eveniya, Any chance to fix the issue in the near future? | |
| 4 | 2024-12-19 06:25 | Evgeniya_rocketdata ♦14 | Hi! Yes, we have planned the edits tomorrow. | |
| 5 | 2024-12-21 17:04 | Dimitar155 ♦658 | Thank you! For the record, the fix was applied in changeset/160425485. | |
| 151307806 by chriszome @ 2024-05-14 11:08 | 1 | 2024-05-15 09:49 | mueschel | Hi,could you check the recycling tags you added here? In OSM only the tags that are described in the Wiki should be used - and they should be in British English and not in French.The table of recycling tags can be found here:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling#Accepte... |
| 151175857 by mueschel @ 2024-05-11 08:46 | 1 | 2024-05-14 01:05 | MxxCon ♦3,359 | Is wikimedia_commons:1= even a valid tag at all? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151175857 |
| 2 | 2024-05-14 07:44 | mueschel | It's a common scheme to add :1 to a key if the value doesn't fit into one tag.Usually this is done only if the value is too long.For wikimedia_commons the more often used semicolon to separate two values doesn't work - file names are allowed to contain semicolons. | |
| 151242751 by Noël Danjou @ 2024-05-12 21:20 | 1 | 2024-05-13 10:47 | mueschel | Hi,you used tags like "railway:signal:speed_limit_distant:id" here. Shouldn't that be 'ref' instead of 'id' to match the common 'ref' tag? |
| 151235655 by wielandb @ 2024-05-12 17:36 | 1 | 2024-05-13 09:51 | mueschel | Hallo,du hast hier bei einigen parking-Tags "vehicle:electric" verwendet.Wir haben zwar noch kein akzptiertes Proposal für die Bezeichnung von E-Fahrzeugen, was aber schon häufiger verwendet wird ist electric_vehicle und electric_car.Ich würde vorschlagen, das entspr... |
| 2 | 2024-05-15 15:49 | wielandb ♦132 | Danke für den Tipp! Ich hab es an vielen Stellen zu electric_car geändert. Ich hoffe ich habe alle erwischt! | |
| 151178296 by gymate @ 2024-05-11 09:51 | 1 | 2024-05-12 08:20 | mueschel | Hi,railway:track_side is a new tag - what does it mean? |
| 2 | 2024-05-12 08:34 | gymate ♦33 | Hi! Please open the source link, it includes the explanation. I'm just trying out this tag as the discussion isn't over yet.If you have any thoughts on the topic, please share them (on the Community Forum, if possible)! | |
| 33074417 by Coilans @ 2015-08-03 16:02 | 1 | 2024-05-11 18:39 | mueschel | Hi,it's a long time since, but this road got a strange 'maxweight_1' tag. Could you check that? |
| 2 | 2024-05-11 20:54 | Coilans ♦1 | Hi, You are right, something is not correct here. I don't know which maxweight of the 2 is correct but it's close by to where I live so I will go and check on site when I get a chance. Thanks | |
| 3 | 2024-05-13 21:47 | Coilans ♦1 | Hi, I have checked and the maxweight is 19t. It's now corrected in the map.Thanks | |
| 30657314 by Papou @ 2015-04-30 11:54 | 1 | 2024-05-11 17:24 | mueschel | Hi,it's a long time, but you used some ride sharing tags here that are not used in other places. Could you check if the documented car_pooling tags fit?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcar_poolingDo you know if these POI still exist? At least the website doesn't... |
| 151176120 by mueschel @ 2024-05-11 08:54 | 1 | 2024-05-11 16:23 | map per ♦1,297 | Ich hatte im 'note' eigentlich extra dazu geschrieben, das es kein öffentlicher Aufzug ist... |
| 2 | 2024-05-11 16:27 | mueschel | Hallo,ein Aufzug ist es trotzdem. Dass er nicht öffentlich genutzt werden kann ergibt sich aus access=private.Ein Privatparkplatz wird ja auch nicht als private:amenity=parking erfasst. | |
| 133889624 by mueschel @ 2023-03-20 09:18 | 1 | 2024-05-10 13:45 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10701109455/history has building:name = biyosavunma that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)Is building:name for building name? In such case it would be much better to put it into name tag. If this object merges builing and POI inside su... |
| 2 | 2024-05-10 13:50 | mueschel | Hi,you better ask the mapper who added the "building name" tag in the first place:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133157482I only added the missing colon. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-13 08:42 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Asked in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133157482Though in such cases where tag is confused in the first place, such migration do not really add anything - it only hides info that whoever was adding this tag was likely a confused newbie.Repairing keys makes sense if their meaning ma... | |
| 151058841 by Stefan_89 @ 2024-05-08 14:17 | 1 | 2024-05-09 12:29 | mueschel | Hallo,was heißt denn "oneway:residential"? Meinst du Anlieger frei? Das wäre dann oneway:destination. |
| 2 | 2024-05-13 05:26 | Stefan_89 ♦11 | Hallo,Danke für den Hinweis. Du hast vollkommen recht - man soll nicht noch schnell, schnell noch etwas verändern.Habe es korrigiert. | |
| 151020787 by Praet Tri-Men @ 2024-05-07 17:18 | 1 | 2024-05-09 09:17 | mueschel | Hi,you added the tag "recycling:Gravats" here. This is not uses in other places. Could you clarify what can be recycled here? |
| 75639771 by AngocA @ 2019-10-14 03:27 | 1 | 2024-05-09 08:37 | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag socket:gb-t20234 on 3 charging points. This tag is not used in other places. Could you check if these are socket:gb_ac or socket:gb_dc or something completely different? |
| 151047440 by mueschel @ 2024-05-08 10:15 | 1 | 2024-05-08 11:30 | Andrew Chadwick ♦56 | This is a public car park, not a health facility, assuming you mean the staff_count:doctors in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Global_Healthsites_Mapping_ProjectI will tag the relevant parking space (and the others, *sigh*) using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking_space |
| 2 | 2024-05-08 11:34 | mueschel | Woops... sorry, didn't look carefully enough before editing.Thanks for fixing and improving it! | |
| 3 | 2024-05-08 11:52 | Andrew Chadwick ♦56 | No problem! My choice of tag on the day was a guess, so let's try this next change as a slight improvement...It's labelled on the ground as "Doctor", and near a health facility (though the building offers lots of other things too). Going with "staff" for now, but it... | |
| 113344381 by JuanMelo @ 2021-11-03 18:24 | 1 | 2024-05-05 17:15 | mueschel | Hi,you used the tag socket:gb-t20234 on 3 charging points. This tag is not used in other places. Could you check if these are socket:gb_ac or socket:gb_dc? |
| 2 | 2024-05-08 20:14 | JuanMelo ♦17 | Hello, I did not create those Tags, I just made some edits to the feature. In the history it seems to be our friend AngocA: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AngocA , perhaps he can tell you the meaning of these Tag.¡Greetings! | |
| 150882934 by NADIA MILENA MELO MARTINEZ @ 2024-05-04 14:30 | 1 | 2024-05-05 09:37 | mueschel | Hi,you added a strange "check_pt" tag to many relations. What's the meaning of them? |
| 150815610 by scuzzmonkey @ 2024-05-03 00:42 | 1 | 2024-05-04 08:34 | mueschel | Hi,there's a problem with the way you edited data here:I guess you downloaded a geojson file, loaded it in JOSM and edited & uploaded it again?This doesn't work, because JOSM can't edit the original object (it's missing the id of it). Instead it creates new duplicat... |
| 2 | 2024-05-04 20:02 | scuzzmonkey ♦1 | Ah, shit.You're spot in with the attempted method. I'm away from my laptop this weekend, but am happy to fix. However, I've not sure how, so any guidance would be greatly appreciated.Ty. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-05 09:01 | mueschel | You're not the first one doing this :-)There's no simple way to merge the copies of the objects again.For now I reverted your two changesets in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150910146Whenever you have time to add the information to the proper objects, you need to load... | |
| 4 | 2024-05-05 09:41 | scuzzmonkey ♦1 | Tysm, really appreciate it. I'll have a look and attempt with 1 item next time. Would it be OK for you me to message you with that for review at that time? Cheers. | |
| 125569269 by mueschel @ 2022-08-30 13:08 | 1 | 2024-05-05 03:10 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Instead of blindly fixing, you should check and see if it is an SEO spammer adding a restaurant in California over one in Wisconsin |
| 2 | 2024-05-05 08:44 | mueschel | You're right. This one was definitely not as obvious as others I removed or fixed. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-05 18:01 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Thank you for correcting. I found this while checking weird addr:state values. | |
| 116075221 by jemm @ 2022-01-12 17:11 | 1 | 2024-05-04 14:31 | mueschel | Hi,as you are the last editor of these buildings: Do you know if all the additional house numbers on these buildings are real or just an artifact of the imported data? Are they actually needed or can they be removed? Several of the keys are used only here and are very unlikely to be understood b... |
| 2 | 2024-05-04 17:30 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Hi, you can check address history in Maa-amet https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/ads?ads_oid=ME03789343it does show that previously it had a lot of addressesHarju maakond, Tallinn, Lasnamäe linnaosa, Kesk-Sõjamäe tn 10a // Lennujaama tee 4 // 6 // 10 // 11 // 12 // 14 // Ta... | |
| 3 | 2024-05-04 17:46 | mueschel | Thanks for looking it up! I guess we should remove those tags now? | |
| 4 | 2024-05-04 17:47 | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦497 | Yes, you can remove them | |
| 150856292 by JaDiCh @ 2024-05-03 21:03 | 1 | 2024-05-04 14:26 | mueschel | Hi,you introduced several new fuel-tags on this gas station. Could you check the wiki for the common tags used for the different kinds of fuel and change the tagging to those?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Afuel |
| 2 | 2024-05-07 14:07 | JaDiCh ♦1 | I set the prices based on the image that the Google Earth images captured. | |
| 150814686 by Natas74D7 @ 2024-05-02 23:16 | 1 | 2024-05-03 17:29 | mueschel | Hi,please check this power plant and its tags - most of them are not used in OSM.Here's a good starting point to look for proper tags:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dplant |
| 150752640 by nuruk @ 2024-05-01 14:04 | 1 | 2024-05-03 17:23 | mueschel | Hi,you added a strange "nameXX" tag on many objects. Please have a look and change them to the proper tags likename, name:en, name:ru, name:kk? |
| 2 | 2024-05-13 19:35 | VlIvYur ♦149 | http://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%28node%5B%22nameXX%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22nameXX%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22nameXX%22%5D%3B%29%3Bout%20meta%3B | |
| 150713794 by flohoff @ 2024-04-30 15:18 | 1 | 2024-05-03 17:03 | mueschel | Hi,schau doch mal nach diesem Node, der hat ein merkwürdiges Tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11868798135 |
| 2 | 2024-05-03 19:01 | flohoff ♦2,354 | Good catch - die Marker beschriftung sollte in das note tag.Wieder zu eilig gehabt.Flo | |
| 135659692 by marek kleciak @ 2023-05-03 12:55 | 1 | 2024-05-03 16:52 | mueschel | Hi,do you still need this area?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168266489 |
| 150642988 by dmich9 @ 2024-04-29 03:36 | 1 | 2024-04-30 14:02 | mueschel | Hi,could you check your workflow? I regularly find and remove "python = scripts/main.py" tags on some objects. |
| 150637064 by mweper @ 2024-04-28 21:18 | 1 | 2024-04-29 16:44 | mueschel | Hi,"lay_bay" is a new tag - what does it mean? |
| 2 | 2024-04-29 17:18 | mweper ♦405 | Sorry. I realized that I wrote wrong, what I meant was https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bus_bayWhen I sit down at the PC, I'll correct it. | |
| 3 | 2024-04-29 17:38 | mueschel | Thx! I fixed it. | |
| 150605388 by NKA @ 2024-04-28 06:48 | 1 | 2024-04-29 10:06 | mueschel | Hi,there are many ways with an ELVIS or REVERSED tag - could you check that? |
| 2 | 2024-04-29 10:58 | NKA ♦247 | Fixed | |
| 150499224 by m03_zajac @ 2024-04-25 14:19 | 1 | 2024-04-27 12:04 | mueschel | Hi,the tag "maxweight_singlevehicle" is not used in other places, and it seems to contradict the 'maxweight'. Do you have an image of the actual sign? |
| 150543510 by moaxed @ 2024-04-26 15:00 | 1 | 2024-04-27 10:41 | mueschel | Hi,you used tags like "parking:charge:conditional" on these 'amenity=parking' objects.The 'parking:' prefix is only used on parking lanes on highways and is not needed on these areas. The common tag is simply "charge:conditional".Could you have a loo... |
| 2 | 2024-04-27 14:43 | moaxed ♦8 | Fixed it. To much street parking tagging... :-) |