didier2020 participated in the following changeset discussions
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
166448190
by atchisson
@ 2025-05-18 20:36
12025-05-26 05:05didier2020 hello,
look at
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?country=france_centre_indre_et_loire&item=1230

there is about 3000 Duplicated node geometry with your changesets/uploads
22025-05-26 08:20atchisson
♦8
Bonjour, désolé pour l'erreur, je suis actuellement en vacances sans ordinateur, je regarde ça mercredi ou jeudi !
Encore désolé
166492199
by atchisson
@ 2025-05-19 18:51
12025-05-26 05:05didier2020 hello,
look at
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?country=france_centre_indre_et_loire&item=1230

there is about 3000 Duplicated node geometry with your changesets/uploads
164626398
by didier2020
@ 2025-04-07 10:11
12025-04-12 10:52AurélienQ
♦117
Salut,
Pourrais-je savoir quelle est ta raison pour avoir revert toutes mes modifs ?
Il est d'ailleurs d'usage de prévenir l'auteur des modifications annulées en précisant pourquoi.
Cordialement,
22025-04-14 13:17didier2020 Bonjour, voila les raisons :
- utilisation de tags inexistant dans le wiki (tunnel:name)
- il n'y a nulle part sur le réseau routier ou le site de la dirif (gestionnaire de l'A86) des panneaux ou références "name" qui décrit l'A86 comme "
...
32025-04-16 17:30AurélienQ
♦117
Bonjour,
'name' ne désigne pas le nom officiel (qui n'existe en effet pas ici, mais serait tagué 'official_name=*') mais le nom d'usage (cf le wiki). Les nombreux sites (i.e. Wikipédia) que j'ai pu consulter mentionnent ces différents n...
163450387
by didier2020
@ 2025-03-10 16:29
12025-03-12 18:32mueschel
♦6,565
Hi,
"maxweight:left" is not a common tag - where does this maxweight apply?
22025-03-13 04:44didier2020 hi. It's a mistake => it's now fixed backward
146468230
by didier2020
@ 2024-01-20 07:46
12024-02-10 06:36Robin Bourgeon
♦7
Le contournement Est de Roissy est bien numéroté A104 tandis que la partie au niveau de Villepinte est maintenant A170. Pourquoi être revenu en arrière sur ces points ?
22024-02-11 14:13didier2020 Cela aurait etre comme cela sauf que les gestionnaires du projet ont oublié que le classement de la N2 en A104 nécessite entre autre une enquete d'utilité publique . Pendant plusieurs années,
le CER sera nommé N104 dans le 95, N1104 dans le 77. A104 entre A...
32024-02-11 14:17didier2020 arrete pour le CER :
https://www.sytadin.fr/trafic/arrete/AIP-DRIEAT-2023-DDT-SEMCV-436-TX.pdf
42025-01-05 00:08Robin Bourgeon
♦7
Savez-vous si finalement le contournement est de Roissy va être appelé A104 ? Ou bien il est voué à rester N104/N1104 définitivement ?
52025-01-07 08:23didier2020 Rien de nouveau ... je ne sais meme pas si les services concernés ont commencé le dossier
158919999
by didier2020
@ 2024-11-09 06:01
12024-11-09 06:14didier2020 rarad74 request :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158904123
158904123
by didier2020
@ 2024-11-08 17:11
12024-11-08 21:38rarad74
♦275
Please revert what you damaged to Bucharest and towns where disapeared rendering for residential landuse. There is no Residential rendering to entire city of Bucharest now. If you delete duplicate node, then do it correctly and repair what is damaged. If you not reverted back, i will revert for shur...
22024-11-09 06:03didier2020 revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158919999

there is now duplicated adress nodes .
I don't understand "residential landuse"
157449344
by shalini-whiz
@ 2024-10-04 08:21
12024-10-05 09:29gscholz
♦2,778
Hi shalini-whiz,
this changeset has created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=79.59458&lat=9.88419&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%...
22024-10-05 14:48IndiaKW2Gf7rTBt5C
♦4
There "data" are useless on OSM, merely the the geomteries that unable to represent any geographic feature.
32024-10-06 14:22didier2020 is it useless to create way with only 1 node ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1320681778
42024-10-06 20:19whb_revert
♦18
Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157556612
149582876
by didier2020
@ 2024-04-04 18:28
12024-10-01 17:56_Mathieu_
♦43
Bonjour, sûr qu'il y a une telle interdiction aussi large ? Sur la plupart de ces voies il n'y a pas de panneau d'interdiction, ou tout au plus un panneau hazmat:E seulement.
22024-10-01 18:39didier2020 bonjour,
c'est reelement cela
http://overpass-turbo.eu/map.html?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A25%5D%3B%0Aarea%28id%3A3600008649%29-%3E.searchArea%3B%0Anwr%5B%22hazmat%3AE%22%3D%22no%22%5D%28area.searchArea%29%3B%0Aout+geom%3B
32024-10-01 19:08_Mathieu_
♦43
Je vois bien le résultat de vos modifications, mais où ces restrictions sont-elles réellement visibles ? Sur la plupart de ces voies il n'y a pas de panneau d'interdiction, ou tout au plus un panneau hazmat:E seulement.
42024-10-02 12:06didier2020 tous ces itinéraires sont liés aux tunnels interdits aux tmd, s'il manque un panneau, préciser le moi, je demanderais a l'ager (responsable de la voierie ) ou SCA d'y remédier.
155061443
by didier2020
@ 2024-08-10 12:53
12024-09-28 18:55zluuzki
♦224
Where exactly have you discussed this mass edit?
22024-09-29 06:57didier2020 i've not discussed to change the tag oneway to flow_direction
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flow%20direction
154880275
by chrizy
@ 2024-08-06 07:52
12024-08-22 14:40didier2020 Bonjour,
vos données dupliquent des informations

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#source=411444&item=1230&class=4&zoom=17&lat=43.943883&lon=4.83803&level=2&issue_uuid=8f18bd23-4786-e477-2059-333af00dcdbe&loc=17/43.943883/4.83803
22024-09-20 08:09chrizy
♦6
Bonjour,
Merci pour votre signalement. Je viens de corriger ceux de la rue Henry Le Chatelier et vais m'occuper de tous les autres sur Avignon dans les jours à venir. Cdlt
32024-09-20 12:17didier2020 Merci !
156711433
by didier2020
@ 2024-09-17 03:23
12024-09-18 11:03flohoff
♦2,354
Moin,
warum hast du hier tonnen an man_made=embankments gelöscht?

Den changeset verstehe ich nicht.

Flo
22024-09-18 11:20didier2020 bonjour Flo,

j'ai corrigé des ways dupliqués détectés grace a osmose
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/done?country=germany_*&item=1230

exemple :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208462941/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178659000
\...
11912175
by didier2020
@ 2012-06-16 08:47
12024-09-12 07:57frosm
♦1,131
Bonjour,
qui a le droit de pénétrer le porc en véhicule ?
apparemment la navette de vus.
mais est-ce que les habitants ont le droit ?
est-ce que les clients d’hôtel ont le droit ?
22024-09-12 09:44didier2020 bonjour, en 12 ans cela a pu changer....
156361260
by zayati wiwi
@ 2024-09-08 16:58
12024-09-09 05:28didier2020 صباح الخير،
عند استخدام josm، فإنك تنشر تغييراتك كبيانات جديدة
وينتج عن هذا بيانات مكررة أو بيانات منقولة.
يرجى تصحيح الأخطاء الخاصة بك.

sabah alkhayri,
eind astikhdam josm, fa'iin...
155846993
by wiemzayati
@ 2024-08-27 18:47
Active block
12024-08-27 20:46didier2020 hello,
can you please stop uploading large amont of duplicated way.
22024-08-27 21:18woodpeck_repair
♦33,903
This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 155851871, 155851861, 155851813, 155851893, 155851796, 155851836, 155851832, 155851785, 155851884, 155851790, 155851856, 155851847, 155851807, 155851810, 155851849, 155851818, 155851815, 155851889, 155851769, 155851844, 155851823, 15585...
155790549
by wiemzayati
@ 2024-08-26 16:05
Active block
12024-08-27 06:52didier2020 Hello,
Existing paths that you have modified are uploaded as new ways.
this generates a very large quantity of duplicates (way or node).
You need to fix this. check your changeset with josm
22024-08-27 21:18woodpeck_repair
♦33,903
This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 155851871, 155851861, 155851813, 155851893, 155851796, 155851836, 155851832, 155851785, 155851884, 155851790, 155851856, 155851847, 155851807, 155851810, 155851849, 155851818, 155851815, 155851889, 155851769, 155851844, 155851823, 15585...
155800361
by wiemzayati
@ 2024-08-26 19:53
Active block
12024-08-27 06:44didier2020 Existing paths that you have modified are uploaded as new ways.
this generates a very large quantity of duplicates (way or node).
check your changeset with josm
22024-08-27 21:18woodpeck_repair
♦33,903
This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 155851871, 155851861, 155851813, 155851893, 155851796, 155851836, 155851832, 155851785, 155851884, 155851790, 155851856, 155851847, 155851807, 155851810, 155851849, 155851818, 155851815, 155851889, 155851769, 155851844, 155851823, 15585...
154468187
by didier2020
@ 2024-07-27 05:41
12024-07-27 16:41HellMap
♦674
Hello,

Can I ask how exactly you are determining that features are duplicates?

For example, for this camera POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9442716021/history , the location here indeed has two cameras on either side of the shop doors: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=278736972142704...
22024-07-28 14:09richlv
♦384
Could it be safer to revert the changeset and redo valid fixes?
32024-07-29 13:05didier2020 Hello,
changeset is reverted.

For example, for this camera POI
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9442716021
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9442707523

this 2 node had exactly the same tags
and exactly same geometry (lat and lon)
so there are duplicated
since you had to add another...
42024-07-29 13:19didier2020 or change the lat and lon
for ex, lat lon of nodes
1812435083 and 1715103641
(right and left of the door of mapillary's photo)
149081481
by didier2020
@ 2024-03-24 10:10
12024-03-28 23:26Britzz
♦231
Il semblerait que le passage de N162 à D962 soit effectif : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Route_nationale_162, êtes-vous sûr de vous ?
Pour info, a été discuté sur https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/bonne-syntaxe-pour-le-cycle-de-vie-dune-reference/22211/
22024-03-29 18:33didier2020 Bonsoir,
voila mes sources :
- dans la version de janvier 2024 (pas encore mise a disposition https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/bornage-du-reseau-routier-national/ )
les axes "transférés" ne changent pas de nom et le gestionnaire devient le département a la place...
80812472
by didier2020
@ 2020-02-10 19:31
12023-11-09 18:08sahilister
♦30
Hi didier2020, I know it's been a long time since you mapped this area in Bhuj, Gujarat, India but wanted to ask a few things regarding this changeset:
I don't think, nor I am able to see Sector numbers in hundreds like "Sector 468" in other maps of Bhuj.
From the source mark...
22023-11-10 15:58didier2020 Hello, i don't map the area, i've just fix an issue with the tag layer for landuses. I can't help you, sorry
32023-11-13 10:15adiatmad
♦446
Hi sahilister, I stumbled upon this discussion and hope you don't mind if I jump in. I noticed that the user ALPZz added the name of Bhuj Sector 468 and more.
Please check this (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/768640087) and (https://osmcha.org/changesets/80656357/). Perhaps they are...
143578147
by didier2020
@ 2023-11-03 14:43
12023-11-06 08:37AurélienQ
♦117
Bonjour,
Quelles sont tes sources ? Car lorsque je cherche sur internet je ne vois aucun site mentionnant que l'autoroute n'est pas classée comme tel.
Et même, si elle est classée en tant que nationale, elle reste faite aux normes autoroutières et doit donc &e...
22023-11-06 15:59didier2020 presque ...: source terrain (photo déposés sur mapillary), il n'y a pas de panneau autoroute.
Source Dirif : Arrêté interpréfectoral 486TX censé etre a la disposition du public (prefecture 95 et 77).

Google et TomTom nomme le cer A104 alors qu'...
32023-11-06 16:08didier2020 a voir sur l'axe, les petites étiquettes du terre plein central indique le nom de l'axe.
mes photos n'ont pas permis de les visualiser correctement :
N1104 PR 13
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=1044623213349693
42023-11-06 18:53AurélienQ
♦117
Super👍, merci pour cette réponse rapide et précise !
J'ai vu que tu n'es déjà pas seul sur le coup, je ne m'en occupe donc pas.
52023-11-08 14:19didier2020 Voila l'arrêté de mise en service :
http://www.sytadin.fr/direct/communiques/arrete/AIP-DRIEAT-2023-DDT-SEMCV-436-TX.pdf
62023-11-08 18:20AurélienQ
♦117
Merci beaucoup !
143572272
by Sekundemal
@ 2023-11-03 12:24
12023-11-04 09:24didier2020 Hello,
you're about uploading the same data "x" times. Bug with "android" ?
Please stop and fix it. Thanks
22023-11-04 09:26didier2020 issues are on :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?country=namibia&item=1230&source=&class=3
or
osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?country=namibia&username=Sekundemal
32023-11-04 09:27didier2020 or
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?country=namibia&item=xxxx&username=Sekundemal
42023-11-05 18:41Sekundemal
♦1
Many thanks for notifying me. Seems to be a common bug with Every Door. I had about 90 old uploads re-uploading with every new change. Will prevent duplicates going forward and take it up with the app developers.
52023-11-06 05:49didier2020 Thanks :-)
62023-11-13 19:53Sekundemal
♦1
The issue is being looked into https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/discussions/676
143624936
by Sekundemal
@ 2023-11-04 18:14
12023-11-05 08:09didier2020 please stop using Every Door Android 4.0

there is 10 times the same data
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11315126569

#DWG
141297954
by Sebasawk
@ 2023-09-15 11:11
12023-10-17 09:10didier2020 Cette correction ne correspond pas a la description des routes N385, N186, A86, A4 et A3. Les références sont disponibles a cet adresse : https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/liaisons-du-reseau-routier-national/

This correction does not correspond to the description of the N385, N1...
22023-10-18 12:42Sebasawk
♦16
Thank you for feedback. I will analyze situation and come back to you.
32023-10-20 16:19Sebasawk
♦16
Hi dider2020,

I have analyzed the situation and understand that your feedback is valid as per provided documents, I will refer this document for further mapping related to Ref information. Happy Mapping!
124841099
by didier2020
@ 2022-08-13 06:12
12022-11-28 22:03Carto'Cité
♦1,138
Bonjour Didier,

Je crois qu'une pratique pour les travaux pour ce type de cas (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085953521) est d'éviter de mettre access=no qui donne l'impression que la piste est privée ou interdite mais existante mais plutôt
highway=constru...
22022-12-06 09:00didier2020 Bonjour, réponse tardive :
la passerelle est en rénovation, l'itinéraire passe maintenant par le passe rive mais pas pour les vélo. La piste cyclable n'est pas en construction il y a des cabanes de chantier qui sont installés entourés par des barr...
32022-12-06 14:17CartoCharles
♦60
Merci pour ton retour. Aucun problème pour le délai de réponse, je suis parfois beaucoup plus long que ça à répondre 😅
Charles
87283332
by didier2020
@ 2020-06-29 09:03
12021-02-06 14:05Forest of Dean
♦3
Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3333102/history lacks many inner elements. What to do?
22021-02-06 16:22didier2020 bonjour, je ne suis pas l'auteur de cette relation. J'ai simplement modifié le contour extérieur suite aux travaux en cours sur la N1194 au niveau de la commune du Mesnil-Amelot
97927890
by JRosinus
@ 2021-01-21 21:11
12021-01-22 13:12ivanbranco
♦2,695
Hi JRosinus,

I think there's a problem with this relation tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12219191
22021-01-23 10:56didier2020 Hi, there was a lot of duplicated relations, ways and nodes with your changesets, it's fixed in this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98014542.
89439561
by didier2020
@ 2020-08-15 08:48
12020-08-15 19:31Harvesterify
♦43
Bonjour,

Vous avez introduit des modifications incorrectes, notamment concernant la vitesse maximale autorisée (cette portion en particulier n'est pas limitée à 70 : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141874623). Pouvez vous corriger ?

Merci.
22020-08-15 20:26didier2020 Bonjour, j'ai saisi les limitations de vitesse que j'ai vu vendredi.
j'ai uploadé les photos sur mapillary si vous voulez vérifier.
32020-08-15 20:37Harvesterify
♦43
Sachant que vous avez pris en photo un panneau 70 sans mention Rappel au niveau du rond point Jean Bertin (https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/didier2020?lat=48.668204&lng=2.1150440000000117&z=20&menu=true&focus=photo&pKey=c-ut91SQdpkSJcksp8SXCQ), dans le sens Limours -> Gometz...
42020-08-15 20:44Harvesterify
♦43
Ah, mon mauvais, il y a bien un panneau 70 en sortie de Limours. Il me semblait pourtant qu'il y avait un panneau indiquant une fin de 70 plus loin justement, mais je n'en trouve pas trace... Mes excuses dans ce cas.
52020-08-15 20:49Harvesterify
♦43
La limitation est d'autant plus étrange qu'elle n'existe pas dans le sens Gometz Limours en sortie du rond point Jean Bertin
62020-08-15 20:59Harvesterify
♦43
C'est bien ce qu'il me semblait : dans l'autre sens, le premier panneau à 70 est bien plus loin (https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/didier2020?lat=48.65728251507246&lng=2.080084475458937&z=17&menu=true&focus=photo&pKey=i_C_U_LImAh4EtvZb32fsA), au niveau de l...
72020-08-16 10:39didier2020 Bonjour,
j'ai saisi les limitations par sens (ajout des panneaux et référnce mapillary) dans le changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89468051
j'espere que c'est bon maintenant.
88071833
by didier2020
@ 2020-07-16 08:06
12020-07-20 16:20mueschel
♦6,565
Could you check this node, it got a strange tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7719745062

Thanks!
22020-07-20 16:36didier2020 "tatouage" is the name of our internal ref...
thanks
86877905
by didier2020
@ 2020-06-19 12:38
12020-06-24 15:22StephaneP
♦467
Bonjour Didier,

Je vois que tu as modifié pas mal de cycleway=track en lane.

Sur le terrain ça ressemble à quoi ? Parce que s'il s'agit d'un ajout de plots pour neutraliser de la place aux voies auto, et créer une "voie" vélo, alors o...
22020-06-25 06:52didier2020 Bonjour Stéphane,

j'ai (mal?) modifié la description pour les vélo sur la D86
car j'ai vu que sur le trajet entre St Maur et Créteil (D86/D19)
il y avait 2 façons de taguer le même type de "neutralisation" de voie pour les vé...
32020-06-26 12:34didier2020 une image :
https://images.mapillary.com/MZApmHaTcIz_4t3gSgRXUg/thumb-2048.jpg
42020-06-26 16:33StephaneP
♦467
Merci pour les images. Ce n'est pas évident de choisir. J'en discute avec Charles et Antoine et peut-être Géovélo, et je reviens vers toi.
Mais bon, dans tous les cas il n'y a pas d'urgence.

A bientôt

Stéphane
52020-07-03 15:24StephaneP
♦467
Voici le retour : Vu le caractère temporaire, on peut laisser ça en lane.
Merci pour tes retours

Stéphane
86461013
by Osmapas
@ 2020-06-10 11:28
12020-06-12 06:16didier2020 Hi,
there is a lot of duplicated node
with same ref JUPxxxx
(one add a tag building and the other no)
issues can be see at
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=brazil_mato_grosso_do_sul&item=1230&level=1%2C2%2C3

have a look, and try to correct this.

74493127
by didier2020
@ 2019-09-15 10:31
12020-04-18 17:23Super-Map
♦67
Hi didier2020,
A wrong keys have been used for this element, I will deleted the way for to "keep" one node only (for to keep the history). Bad use: "information=board", "tourism=information". Moreover, please check the ref and the operator and delete it if it's n...
22020-04-19 06:06didier2020 je ne vois pas en quoi les tags utilisés sont mauvais puisqu'il n'y en a pas de spécifique pour les pmv et pourquoi supposez vous que les données saisies sont erronnées ?
je ne me permets pas de dire que j'ai raison, aussi si cela vous dérange, vou...
32020-04-19 06:10didier2020 you can find all others with overpass
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/T1L

74580699
by didier2020
@ 2019-09-17 13:25
12020-04-18 15:29Super-Map
♦67
Hi didier2020, I would like to inform you, you had used a wrong "key" for this element and it's appear to be a wrong "ref" (A4-A86) too... Effectively,: "information=board; tourism = information are wrong. Moreover. By advance, thank for your understanding. https://www....
22020-04-18 15:33Super-Map
♦67
As you can see, everybody do "mistakes", this is the right imagery:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=3a-lD_5b6tsqEu0anuKbrQ&lat=48.8053146428&lng=2.448939562239957&z=17
32020-04-18 16:59didier2020 bonjour,
merci pour le signalement.
je me suis trompé pour la localisation,
c'est corrigé https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83749656.
pour les tags, je n'ai rien trouvé de plus simple pour un panneau a message variable
(https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panneau_...
81318615
by didier2020
@ 2020-02-21 13:07
12020-02-25 15:56Carto'Cité
♦1,138
Bonjour.
Je suis intrigué par ce chemin https://www.osm.org/way/775243530 qui en croise 2 autres sans qu'il n'y ait de bridge ou tunnel. En regardant sur la BDOrtho il semble que la liaison se situe entre les nodes https://www.osm.org/node/1925550192 et https://www.osm.org/node/192...
22020-02-25 17:20didier2020 bonjour,
j'ai fais une mise a jour ici :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81465652
32020-02-25 18:03Carto'Cité
♦1,138
Super, merci.
78430501
by didier2020
@ 2019-12-15 13:59
12019-12-17 23:06aceman444
♦2,567
Hi. Yes, railway=disused on a node looks wrong, but disused:railway=buffer_stop actually looks correct. Why did you remove it? The same with disused:railway=level_crossing.
22019-12-18 08:04didier2020 sorry, it's a mistake
revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78567936
77192622
by VaeroW
@ 2019-11-17 15:58
12019-11-18 20:33didier2020 Hi,
there is something wrong with some of yours changeset (exactly same duplicated geometry and exactly same tags)

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#country=germany_bayern_mittelfranken&item=1230&level=1&zoom=16&lat=49.46147&lon=10.99536
76768157
by Ritu Shandilya
@ 2019-11-07 16:26
12019-11-09 18:30FvGordon
♦217
With Parkhaus 303 it looks like you have uploaded some levels multiple times, because I found the following ways of the north west spiral on top of each other, using the same nodes:
Level 2: 742978846, 742643120
Level 3: 742979579, 742967403, 742979267
Level 4: 742979685, 742979701, 742967354, 74...
22019-11-11 10:51didier2020 hi,there is something wrong with yours changeset,
there is multiple duplicated way (exactly same geometry and exactly same tags)
like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742979880
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742980009
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742979986
https://www.openstreetmap.o...
32019-11-12 11:55Nakaner-repair
♦8,261
This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76957750 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Ritu Shandilya due to usage of buggy development application on production database uploading messy geometries.
74196126
by gfdklgdldsfgkgfd
@ 2019-09-07 00:57
12019-09-07 09:50didier2020 bonjour,

il y a un probleme de doublon avec vos 2 changesets :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74196041
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74196126

erreur détecté grace a osmose :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=france_poitou_charentes_vienne&a...
22019-09-07 21:07gfdklgdldsfgkgfd
♦27
corrigé via un revert des changset, erreur d'upload suite à un crash de josm. Je vais tout recommancer
73699885
by didier2020
@ 2019-08-24 16:36
12019-08-30 13:14Carto'Cité
♦1,138
Bonjour.
Tu as supprimé sur la voie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38781145 plusieurs tags dont oneway=yes, qui n'est pas par défaut selon le wiki qui précise bien "Ajouter oneway=yes ". C'est un peu dangereux non ?

Antoine de Carto'Cité, p...
22019-08-30 13:18Carto'Cité
♦1,138
Bon en observant les autres bretelles je vois que c'est une maladresse : j'ai corrigé.
Antoine.
32019-08-31 07:06didier2020 Merci !
70364433
by didier2020
@ 2019-05-17 16:12
12019-05-31 09:26pyrog
♦335
Salut Didier,

J'ai eu un problème avec JOSM lors de l'envoi de mes modifications.

As-tu supprimé seulement les objets en doublon (poteaux de la ligne électrique, bornes de repérage du gazoduc) ou as-tu fait un reverse de tout le changeset ?

Merci.

Yv...
22019-05-31 13:10didier2020 Bonjour Yves,
j'ai supprimé les objets en doublons dans ce changeset et aussi celui la :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/690564894

cdlt,
didier

70610358
by didier2020
@ 2019-05-25 12:35
12019-05-27 14:39Florimondable
♦126
Bonjour, je ne suis pas convaincu par le tagging. Pour moi ça serait highway=motorway et access=private.
Parce que ça reste une structurellement une autoroute et non une voie de service, avec un accès fermé au public.
22019-05-27 17:20didier2020 bonsoir,
elle ne reste pas une route :
http://www.montreuil.fr/outils/actualites/article/fermeture-definitive-de-la-a186-les-travaux-de-prolongement-du-tramway-t1-commencent/
32019-05-28 08:17Florimondable
♦126
Openstreetmap doit refléter la réalité à ce jour pas le futur ni le passé. Aujourd'hui j'imagine (je ne suis pas allé sur le terrain mais votre lien me confirme cela) que l'autoroute et encore en presque totalité à l'é...
42019-05-28 19:13didier2020 Ca ne me dérange pas que vous fassiez ces modifications.
70520824
by didier2020
@ 2019-05-22 16:04
12019-05-22 16:09didier2020 détection des erreurs :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?source=3690&item=1230&class=5&start_date=2019-03
69869253
by didier2020
@ 2019-05-04 08:51
12019-05-05 09:41geow
♦446
Hi didier2020, wow, thanks for fixing this.

Just curious: Do you know if the numerous duplicates are due to a systematic error?

Thanks
geow
22019-05-05 09:46geow
♦446
BTW...I came across your work by

http://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries&country=Nepal
32019-05-07 07:55didier2020 Hi, it's not systematic. It's in a changeset with duplicated way or 2 (or more) uploads with same data ...
Large errors are on buildings and trees.
42019-05-07 07:59didier2020 you can look at :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?country=nepal&item=1230,0

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=nepal&item=1230,0
68833754
by AJA21
@ 2019-04-03 11:23
12019-04-04 07:24didier2020 Bonjour,
grace a osmose,
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?source=407527&item=1230&class=3
j'ai vu que vous aviez déjà "uploadé" ces adresses dans un autre changeset :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68833754
https://www.openstreetmap....
22019-04-04 19:27AJA21
♦8
oups j ai cru avoir fait Appoigny
merci pour la correction
68466379
by onee1234
@ 2019-03-24 10:17
12019-03-25 17:56didier2020 hi,
there is a lot off mistakes in your changesets like :
- adding tags building for all way and nodes in larges area.
- deleting tags highway for several roads.

ask for help if you just want to add
the tag building on closed way with only the tag area=yes

22019-03-27 18:48SomeoneElse_Revert
♦70,576
This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 68543981, 68570121, 68576960, 68527856, 68530448, 68518563, 68550459, 68557308, 68533311, 68563156, 68567349, 68524407, 68537615 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some new user add a building tag to every node edits in Thailand....
68251806
by didier2020
@ 2019-03-18 09:16
12019-03-18 11:07wille
♦523
Hi Didier,

Thanks for fixing it. I invite you to use OSMCha and mark the changesets that you review as bad/good and add the "Resolved" tag to the ones that you fix.

thank you very much!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://...
22019-03-18 17:45didier2020 hello,
i write to the user in this chanf=geset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68230533
68230533
by onee1234
@ 2019-03-17 15:07
12019-03-18 09:14didier2020 hi,
you add tag building on nodes and highways,
it's a mistake :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?source=5820&item=4090&class=1

i corrected in several changeset and it's now fixed


22019-03-27 18:48SomeoneElse_Revert
♦70,576
This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 68543981, 68570121, 68576960, 68527856, 68530448, 68518563, 68550459, 68557308, 68533311, 68563156, 68567349, 68524407, 68537615 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some new user add a building tag to every node edits in Thailand....
67436644
by Menir_PMI
@ 2019-02-21 17:06
12019-02-21 20:38didier2020 hi,
- you upload large changeset with no tags like way 672074809
- there is also duplicated way geometry and tags (more than 4 times)

it's seams to be import , so you had to see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import
65477698
by addr2osm
@ 2018-12-14 15:52
12018-12-22 16:04didier2020 hi,
you create new addresses when they already exist
difference is the tag "source:date"
like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6137555771
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5923292365
22018-12-22 16:05didier2020 like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6137555771/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5923292365
32018-12-22 18:03addr2osm
♦11
Ok, I will make sure that source tags are disregarded during the import. Thanks.
63833260
by didier2020
@ 2018-10-24 13:36
12018-11-10 08:45cquest
♦270
landuse/building = retail et pas commercial (faux-ami à utiliser pour les bureaux) !

Moi qui voulais aller mapper ce coin, c'est loupé, tu as tout fait ;)
22018-11-11 16:45didier2020 désolaye ;-)
63950229
by Globeur
@ 2018-10-28 13:22
12018-11-02 21:40didier2020 Bonjour,
faire attention a l'envoie d'adresse en double
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?source=2370&item=1230&class=3&start_date=2018-10
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?source=2374&item=1230&class=3&start_date=2018-10
62280902
by didier2020
@ 2018-09-04 14:00
12018-09-04 14:03didier2020 changeset to fix osmose errors like
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?source=7196&item=1230&class=5&start_date=2018-08
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?source=7184&item=4090&class=1&start_date=2018
61983827
by Cascafico
@ 2018-08-25 12:31
12018-08-25 16:12bubix
♦88
Anche se non avessi dovuto essere Attila questo nodo 5856454180 l'ho evidentemente aggiornato male perché l'importo ha duplicato il distributore. Questo modo é da cancellare. Bubix in vacanza...
22018-08-27 08:46tyr_asd
♦440
Hi. A few questions: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385683058 looks odd: A building way with only two nodes? It looks like you probably used outdated OSM data for the conflation process?! It looks like this osm way would have been the right one to update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6189495...
32018-08-27 08:48tyr_asd
♦440
PS: Any reason why you used another account to upload these changes and not "attilaimport" (as in your first two changesets, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61948858) as described in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/ItalyFuelStations#Dedicated_upload_accoun...
42018-08-27 08:54tyr_asd
♦440
PSS: Here you also have re-created one fuel station that I've deleted on purpose last week because the import location was wrong (or very much outdated) and the fuel station was already mapped in OSM at the correct location.

This is my changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61958...
52018-08-27 09:12attilaimport
♦1
Hi,

some time passed for having, say, 10.000 out of 20.000 POIs reviewed by audit, so this could have caused intermediate editings to be overwritten.

About using another account, my mistake: using different machines, I forgot to update JOSM configuration in one of them.

About duplicates, we...
62018-08-27 17:07didier2020 a lot of duplicated nodes since your "job" !
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?item=1230&class=3&country=italy_*&start_date=2018-08


72018-08-29 19:40luschi
♦417
@attilaimport/Attila_import and Cascafico: why do you use "ref:mise"?
for me this looks like a number only used from MISE.
For me this key make no sense.
I can not see this number on the fuel station and also is this number not visible on the receipt.
Have you planned to del...
82018-08-29 19:48Cascafico
♦577
@luschi
Well, even postcode is only used by Poste Italiane and is not visible in city limit billboards.
92018-08-29 20:34luschi
♦417
lol
postcode is used all over the world and they are used by Poste Italiane, DHL, Fedex, Bartolini, GLS, UPS, Hermes, SDA, Cinese Post, etc. There is no company they use his own number to find a address...
Postcodes are a global approved number.
Internal number of MISE is only used from MISE...
102018-08-30 08:46Cascafico
♦577
@luschi
should I start deleting all this stuff?
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=ref%3A
112018-08-30 17:05luschi
♦417
no.
There are a lot of tagging what are used only in one country or only by one user or as a not good preparation before data import.
So I think we should not add a new "nonsense" tagging to the OSM database.
54337344
by didier2020
@ 2017-12-04 17:51
12017-12-04 17:53didier2020 user or Vespucci bug ?
54336706
by didier2020
@ 2017-12-04 17:27
12017-12-04 17:53didier2020 user or Vespucci bug ?
51032894
by htonchia
@ 2017-08-11 12:44
12017-11-23 16:52didier2020 cette route est trunk : pas une voie express.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.75345688888889&lng=2.378530527777778&z=17&pKey=hMo1BJp22Qh2m3lJLSzmbw&focus=photo

Cette route est la N186 (voir &tiquette des points repères sur le terre plein central , visible sur le ...
22017-11-23 17:57htonchia
♦2
Bonjour,
Il n'y a aucun doute sur le fait que la route passe de A86 a N186 sur le tronçon.
Par contre les changements ne semblent pas cohérents entre la branche nord et la branche sud et à certains endroits on a même en // la N186 et l'A86 dans la branche sud.\...
32017-11-23 19:45didier2020 .. à penser ...
54030943
by didier2020
@ 2017-11-23 17:05
12017-11-23 17:08didier2020 panneau de fin de voie express :
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.625661666666666&lng=2.3381825000000003&z=17&pKey=t5tIuvxkaz72JnXgzTpVnQ&focus=photo
53455604
by Santi Benejam
@ 2017-11-02 15:55
12017-11-03 10:10Santi Benejam
♦1
Can anyone delete this changeset?.
22017-11-04 16:55didier2020 done in this changeset
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53509161
52898268
by OSM Projeto
@ 2017-10-13 15:27
12017-10-13 15:34didier2020 hi,
your data is an import
there is no source for your tags "Layer" or "EntityHand"
there is a lot of nodes with wrongs tags like this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5165539277

can you fix this ?
52046206
by didier2020
@ 2017-09-14 17:57
12017-09-15 10:53wambacher
♦435
Hi Didier, i know that you are a experenced mapper, but last day you did a lot of errors in DOM.

you "killed" 18 (eighteen!!) AL4-Boundaries in DOM by changing them without care.

see list: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1021-countries-compare-2017-09-15

al...
22017-09-15 12:10didier2020 Hi, thanks for your message. Work is in progress. All will be ok in a few day.

51897302
by Mansmhmd
@ 2017-09-10 05:07
12017-09-12 18:18didier2020 hi,
you upload same data several times
you can see issues at
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/?username=Mansmhmd#
51522361
by Zibi-importy
@ 2017-08-28 21:23
12017-08-29 18:14didier2020 hello,
i've fixed duplicated adress from your import
you can see it for example at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51552208

best regards
didier
22017-08-31 12:19Zbigniew_Cz
♦974
Thanks :-)
50703249
by ArjanO
@ 2017-07-30 21:16
12017-08-03 05:53didier2020 Hi, you upload multiple nodes at the same x,y
- with near same tags : Id or id
- with no main tag : street_lamp
- duplicated
22017-08-03 05:55didier2020 graph of issues :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?country=netherlands_utrecht&item=1230&start_date=2017-07
32017-08-08 14:19ArjanO
♦4
I guess something went wrong with an import.
Point taken.

best regards,
Arjano
42017-08-11 12:00escada
♦168
Is there a page where the import was discussed before execution ?
50535860
by ArjanO
@ 2017-07-24 18:13
12017-07-26 15:59mueschel
♦6,565
Hi,
something went wrong here.
There are 160 nodes on the same spot, all with a lot of foreign tags which don't look like they belong to OSM:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4990832927

Jan
22017-07-26 16:02mueschel
♦6,565
PS: I doubt that these lights are 4.5 km high. 'height' uses meter as units, not millimeters.
32017-07-28 13:58didier2020 i fix height in this changeset 50650261
42017-08-08 14:20ArjanO
♦4
I guess something went wrong with an import.
Point taken.

best regards,
Arjano
50130355
by amisha2016
@ 2017-07-08 12:01
12017-07-10 12:30didier2020 hi,
in this changeset/area there is
- duplicated way (géometry and tags)
- duplicated nodes (géometry and tags)
- Way node tagged like way

like this
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7381948
i think it's an import and not source=knowledge

Can you fix all this iss...
22017-07-10 12:31didier2020 major issues are on osmose :
- http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=india_punjab&item=1230
- http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?source=17424&item=4090&class=1
32017-07-10 18:03SomeoneElse
♦13,362
@didier2020 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1400 (which has now been read).
42017-07-10 18:37amisha2016
♦2
@SomeoneElse
Shall I revert the changeset 50130355?
Procedure following:-
1. In JOSM, downloaded the plugin reverter
2. Revert the changeset 5013055
3. Upload
I have not uploaded yet. If you say I will upload it.
52017-07-10 19:35SomeoneElse
♦13,362
Since there are a few problems, and there are also "fixup" edits by other mappers since, it might be easier if I did it. I'll be in a position to do it in a couple of hours.
62017-07-10 23:23SomeoneElse_Revert
♦70,576
This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
72017-07-11 08:02SomeoneElse
♦13,362
OK, all now finally complete. There were a significant number of problems here.
Firstly, before doing any sort of import you'll need to read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import , https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edi...
41195794
by didier2020
@ 2016-08-02 16:16
12016-08-04 10:54mueschel
♦6,565
Hi,
could you check the tagging of these parking:lane? E.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29015063
As far as I know it should be parking:condition:right=disc (no ":1.5") in the key. Also, the maxstay should have a unit - some pages in the wiki suggest minutes as default, but your tag...
22016-08-04 16:23didier2020 hi,
it was sure i do mistake with this tags !
41115396
by botdidier2020
@ 2016-07-29 18:26
12016-07-29 20:42scai
♦267
Can you please at least use English changeset comments when editing in Germany?
22016-07-30 03:44didier2020 fix nodes with duplicated geometry and tags/values

you can see fixed issues there:
http://dev.osmose.frontend.dirif.info/en/errors/done?country=germany*&item=1230&class=3
(for a few day)
41115387
by botdidier2020
@ 2016-07-29 18:26
12016-07-29 20:42scai
♦267
Can you please at least use English changeset comments when editing in Germany?
22016-07-29 22:03MKnight
♦909
scai: die englische Beschreibung findet sich auf der wikiseite.

dieser CS hier ist übrigens weitgehend identisch zu einem revert im Februar: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37478950 mal schauen, ob/was da kommt.

Die Daten hier sehen nach 5 Stichproben allerdings schlüssig un...
32016-07-30 03:39didier2020 fix (ways or nodes) Duplicated geometry and tags/values
issues is from a personnal osmose analyser ("official" osmose analyseur detect duplicated geom error only for way at this time)
you can see fixed issues there:
http://dev.osmose.frontend.dirif.info/en/errors/done?country=germany*&...
35785865
by didier2020
@ 2015-12-06 13:41
12016-04-11 14:08djana
♦2
I notice one small mistake in this changeset: a old building has been re-introduced (Building #384559427) on the map (has been tore down for more than 2 yrs). So there might be other issues: the satellite image still show the old building. I'll to fix the school complex to which this building u...
22016-04-11 20:36didier2020 as you can see :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384559427/history
i've just fixed
- name = 0
- type = 0
- id = xxx without source
32016-04-11 21:21djana
♦2
Thanks! I cannot see the change yet. I am guessing it will take a little time till the map is updated.
37518262
by loumoi
@ 2016-02-29 10:30
12016-03-17 08:12didier2020 bonjour,

dans ce changeset, les routes ajoutées sont dupliquées avec des routes déja existantes...
il "suffit" d'utiliser la validation dans josm pour identifier ces erreurs; josm permet meme de faire automatiquement les corrections.
36854085
by martine lilika
@ 2016-01-28 10:45
12016-01-29 07:56didier2020 hi,

there is a lot of duplicated buildings in this changeset :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36854085
and between this other
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36815838

exemple :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393608193
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394333140
http://ww...
36736611
by laureane
@ 2016-01-22 11:18
12016-01-26 13:24didier2020 hi,
be carefull when you upload data , there is a lot off duplicated buildings.
(you can use validator with josm before upload, josm do the job)
36793426
by kamone
@ 2016-01-25 10:53
12016-01-26 13:17didier2020 hi,
be carefull when you upload data , there is a lot off duplicated buildings.
(you can use validator with josm before upload, josm do the job)

36743170
by didier2020
@ 2016-01-22 16:57
12016-01-24 16:03Sanderd17
♦39
Hi, I see you fixed some issues in this region. Do you have more info on what went wrong?

Would you want to join the discussions at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_landuse_import and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_buildi...
22016-01-24 18:09didier2020 i detect with osmose
duplicated buidlings with this users
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kamone
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/angelin%20zegha
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/laureane

ans duplicated ways landuse with this users
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bdiscoe
http://www.o...
36422202
by saikabhi
@ 2016-01-07 11:43
12016-01-16 09:38didier2020 the way 390035658 is not a building,
can you find better tag ?
thanks
22016-01-17 07:52saikabhi
♦159
Thank you for the feedback and pointing the error out to me. It was an oversight on my part. Have removed the invalid building. The changes are reflected in this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36628736
35772664
by Luís Carlos Madeira
@ 2015-12-05 17:11
12015-12-05 18:18didier2020 can you fix this for nodes :
- there is tags building on nodes
can you fix this for way :
- name = 0
- type = 0
- id = xxx without source
thank's
35751556
by Luís Carlos Madeira
@ 2015-12-04 16:44
12015-12-04 21:58didier2020 it's a test ?
- there is no building on bing
- nodes had tags building (fixed)
22015-12-05 17:32Luís Carlos Madeira
♦1
Please do not consider those buildings, they dont belong to that area. That's why you cant find buildings in Bing.
32015-12-07 00:02SimonPoole
♦339
@Luis could you explain what you were trying to do? While the changeset has been reverted (thanks @didier2020) what ever you were doing went very wrong.
35731411
by cquest
@ 2015-12-03 17:17
12015-12-03 20:09didier2020 il manque Ville d'automne ?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35731411#map=13/44.6369/-1.1718
35605310
by ccjjmartin_atxbuildings
@ 2015-11-27 06:26
12015-11-29 15:36didier2020 this changeset contains duplicated way
fixed in
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35647756
35584350
by patisilva_atxbuildings
@ 2015-11-26 04:28
12015-11-27 14:14didier2020 this changeset genererate duplicated way
fixed
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35612012
35560352
by patisilva_atxbuildings
@ 2015-11-24 21:24
12015-11-26 16:35didier2020 this changeset seems to be egals to http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35542766.

35519259
by ccjjmartin__atxbuildings
@ 2015-11-22 22:36
12015-11-24 10:32didier2020 this changeset contains duplicated building.
I fix it in :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35547413
35434843
by Mat Marçal
@ 2015-11-19 13:54
12015-11-23 17:10didier2020 bonjour,
les noeuds des batiments avec le tag building et certains batiments étaient en double,
j'ai efféctué les corrections dans ce changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35534613

35082117
by snapping
@ 2015-11-04 15:55
12015-11-18 18:15didier2020 a you can see http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?source=2398&item=1230&class=1
there is a lot off duplicated way
you can fix it ?
7267931
by didier2020
@ 2011-02-12 18:40
12015-11-15 20:39GerdP
♦2,751
please review:
This way is tagged
highway=ford , but no waterway is mapped close to it:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99374581
22015-11-15 22:18didier2020 i "map" what i see in my hollidays ...
highway-> ford whas easy but i don't know the area of the water and i can't see water with bing ....
32015-11-15 22:24GerdP
♦2,751
Maybe the way was just flooded with rain?
34922545
by NicolasMique
@ 2015-10-28 09:59
12015-10-29 06:26didier2020 les tags buildings et source sont en trop sur les ways composants les batiments
34928798
by NicolasMique
@ 2015-10-28 15:11
12015-10-29 06:24didier2020 il ne faut pas ajouter le tag building=house sur les noeuds composants un way qui a déja ce tag
34428457
by LeTopographeFou
@ 2015-10-04 14:08
12015-10-05 17:21didier2020 c'est plutot UnQuality Assurance on trees :
nodes with tag leaf_type=broadleaved

comme celui-la : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2640855577



22015-10-07 21:00SomeoneElse
♦13,362
@LeTopographeFou - are you going to correct the errors that you've introduced in this changeset (as identified by didier2020 ) or do you need help doing so? Please also do reply to the changeset discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34479372 .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (Som...
32015-10-08 23:24LeTopographeFou
♦81
I don't understand what didier2020 expects from me and where I have introduced any error. I only understand that I should have commented better m'y changeset.
42015-10-09 11:38didier2020 en regardant l'historique ce node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2640855577/history

on voit que tag leaft_type=boradleveled a été ajouté dans ce changeset, alors que seul le way aurait du être modifié.
52015-10-27 12:37LeTopographeFou
♦81
Ok, thank you for the fix
30299573
by Rodarte!
@ 2015-04-18 03:50
12015-04-18 07:16didier2020 script with bug or is there a troll in your house ?
28448670
by JLZIMMERMANN
@ 2015-01-27 18:50
12015-01-28 19:34didier2020 importer des batiments c'est bien, regarder s'il y en a pas déjà c'est mieux ... non ?
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#zoom=13&lat=44.0511136942087&lon=4.01982479876925&item=0
27760866
by Minie-Mini
@ 2014-12-28 19:00
12014-12-30 14:32didier2020 j'ai corrigé ce changeset : 3 relations ayant le meme nom .
- les relations des 4 anciennes communes sont restaurée mais en admin_level=9
- création nouvelle relation Boischampré en admin_level=8.
22015-02-13 18:00Minie-Mini
♦4
Parfait