| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 166448190 by atchisson @ 2025-05-18 20:36 | 1 | 2025-05-26 05:05 | didier2020 | hello,look athttps://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?country=france_centre_indre_et_loire&item=1230there is about 3000 Duplicated node geometry with your changesets/uploads |
| 2 | 2025-05-26 08:20 | atchisson ♦8 | Bonjour, désolé pour l'erreur, je suis actuellement en vacances sans ordinateur, je regarde ça mercredi ou jeudi !Encore désolé | |
| 166492199 by atchisson @ 2025-05-19 18:51 | 1 | 2025-05-26 05:05 | didier2020 | hello,look athttps://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?country=france_centre_indre_et_loire&item=1230there is about 3000 Duplicated node geometry with your changesets/uploads |
| 164626398 by didier2020 @ 2025-04-07 10:11 | 1 | 2025-04-12 10:52 | AurélienQ ♦117 | Salut, Pourrais-je savoir quelle est ta raison pour avoir revert toutes mes modifs ?Il est d'ailleurs d'usage de prévenir l'auteur des modifications annulées en précisant pourquoi.Cordialement, |
| 2 | 2025-04-14 13:17 | didier2020 | Bonjour, voila les raisons :- utilisation de tags inexistant dans le wiki (tunnel:name)- il n'y a nulle part sur le réseau routier ou le site de la dirif (gestionnaire de l'A86) des panneaux ou références "name" qui décrit l'A86 comme "... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-16 17:30 | AurélienQ ♦117 | Bonjour,'name' ne désigne pas le nom officiel (qui n'existe en effet pas ici, mais serait tagué 'official_name=*') mais le nom d'usage (cf le wiki). Les nombreux sites (i.e. Wikipédia) que j'ai pu consulter mentionnent ces différents n... | |
| 163450387 by didier2020 @ 2025-03-10 16:29 | 1 | 2025-03-12 18:32 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Hi,"maxweight:left" is not a common tag - where does this maxweight apply? |
| 2 | 2025-03-13 04:44 | didier2020 | hi. It's a mistake => it's now fixed backward | |
| 146468230 by didier2020 @ 2024-01-20 07:46 | 1 | 2024-02-10 06:36 | Robin Bourgeon ♦7 | Le contournement Est de Roissy est bien numéroté A104 tandis que la partie au niveau de Villepinte est maintenant A170. Pourquoi être revenu en arrière sur ces points ? |
| 2 | 2024-02-11 14:13 | didier2020 | Cela aurait etre comme cela sauf que les gestionnaires du projet ont oublié que le classement de la N2 en A104 nécessite entre autre une enquete d'utilité publique . Pendant plusieurs années, le CER sera nommé N104 dans le 95, N1104 dans le 77. A104 entre A... | |
| 3 | 2024-02-11 14:17 | didier2020 | arrete pour le CER :https://www.sytadin.fr/trafic/arrete/AIP-DRIEAT-2023-DDT-SEMCV-436-TX.pdf | |
| 4 | 2025-01-05 00:08 | Robin Bourgeon ♦7 | Savez-vous si finalement le contournement est de Roissy va être appelé A104 ? Ou bien il est voué à rester N104/N1104 définitivement ? | |
| 5 | 2025-01-07 08:23 | didier2020 | Rien de nouveau ... je ne sais meme pas si les services concernés ont commencé le dossier | |
| 158919999 by didier2020 @ 2024-11-09 06:01 | 1 | 2024-11-09 06:14 | didier2020 | rarad74 request :https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158904123 |
| 158904123 by didier2020 @ 2024-11-08 17:11 | 1 | 2024-11-08 21:38 | rarad74 ♦275 | Please revert what you damaged to Bucharest and towns where disapeared rendering for residential landuse. There is no Residential rendering to entire city of Bucharest now. If you delete duplicate node, then do it correctly and repair what is damaged. If you not reverted back, i will revert for shur... |
| 2 | 2024-11-09 06:03 | didier2020 | revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158919999there is now duplicated adress nodes .I don't understand "residential landuse" | |
| 157449344 by shalini-whiz @ 2024-10-04 08:21 | 1 | 2024-10-05 09:29 | gscholz ♦2,778 | Hi shalini-whiz,this changeset has created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=79.59458&lat=9.88419&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%... |
| 2 | 2024-10-05 14:48 | IndiaKW2Gf7rTBt5C ♦4 | There "data" are useless on OSM, merely the the geomteries that unable to represent any geographic feature. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-06 14:22 | didier2020 | is it useless to create way with only 1 node ?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1320681778 | |
| 4 | 2024-10-06 20:19 | whb_revert ♦18 | Reverted:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157556612 | |
| 149582876 by didier2020 @ 2024-04-04 18:28 | 1 | 2024-10-01 17:56 | _Mathieu_ ♦43 | Bonjour, sûr qu'il y a une telle interdiction aussi large ? Sur la plupart de ces voies il n'y a pas de panneau d'interdiction, ou tout au plus un panneau hazmat:E seulement. |
| 2 | 2024-10-01 18:39 | didier2020 | bonjour,c'est reelement celahttp://overpass-turbo.eu/map.html?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A25%5D%3B%0Aarea%28id%3A3600008649%29-%3E.searchArea%3B%0Anwr%5B%22hazmat%3AE%22%3D%22no%22%5D%28area.searchArea%29%3B%0Aout+geom%3B | |
| 3 | 2024-10-01 19:08 | _Mathieu_ ♦43 | Je vois bien le résultat de vos modifications, mais où ces restrictions sont-elles réellement visibles ? Sur la plupart de ces voies il n'y a pas de panneau d'interdiction, ou tout au plus un panneau hazmat:E seulement. | |
| 4 | 2024-10-02 12:06 | didier2020 | tous ces itinéraires sont liés aux tunnels interdits aux tmd, s'il manque un panneau, préciser le moi, je demanderais a l'ager (responsable de la voierie ) ou SCA d'y remédier. | |
| 155061443 by didier2020 @ 2024-08-10 12:53 | 1 | 2024-09-28 18:55 | zluuzki ♦224 | Where exactly have you discussed this mass edit? |
| 2 | 2024-09-29 06:57 | didier2020 | i've not discussed to change the tag oneway to flow_directionhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flow%20direction | |
| 154880275 by chrizy @ 2024-08-06 07:52 | 1 | 2024-08-22 14:40 | didier2020 | Bonjour,vos données dupliquent des informationshttps://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#source=411444&item=1230&class=4&zoom=17&lat=43.943883&lon=4.83803&level=2&issue_uuid=8f18bd23-4786-e477-2059-333af00dcdbe&loc=17/43.943883/4.83803 |
| 2 | 2024-09-20 08:09 | chrizy ♦6 | Bonjour,Merci pour votre signalement. Je viens de corriger ceux de la rue Henry Le Chatelier et vais m'occuper de tous les autres sur Avignon dans les jours à venir. Cdlt | |
| 3 | 2024-09-20 12:17 | didier2020 | Merci ! | |
| 156711433 by didier2020 @ 2024-09-17 03:23 | 1 | 2024-09-18 11:03 | flohoff ♦2,354 | Moin,warum hast du hier tonnen an man_made=embankments gelöscht? Den changeset verstehe ich nicht.Flo |
| 2 | 2024-09-18 11:20 | didier2020 | bonjour Flo,j'ai corrigé des ways dupliqués détectés grace a osmosehttps://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/done?country=germany_*&item=1230exemple :https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208462941/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178659000\... | |
| 11912175 by didier2020 @ 2012-06-16 08:47 | 1 | 2024-09-12 07:57 | frosm ♦1,131 | Bonjour,qui a le droit de pénétrer le porc en véhicule ?apparemment la navette de vus.mais est-ce que les habitants ont le droit ?est-ce que les clients d’hôtel ont le droit ? |
| 2 | 2024-09-12 09:44 | didier2020 | bonjour, en 12 ans cela a pu changer.... | |
| 156361260 by zayati wiwi @ 2024-09-08 16:58 | 1 | 2024-09-09 05:28 | didier2020 | صباح الخير،عند استخدام josm، فإنك تنشر تغييراتك كبيانات جديدةوينتج عن هذا بيانات مكررة أو بيانات منقولة.يرجى تصحيح الأخطاء الخاصة بك.sabah alkhayri,eind astikhdam josm, fa'iin... |
| 155846993 by wiemzayati @ 2024-08-27 18:47 Active block | 1 | 2024-08-27 20:46 | didier2020 | hello,can you please stop uploading large amont of duplicated way. |
| 2 | 2024-08-27 21:18 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 155851871, 155851861, 155851813, 155851893, 155851796, 155851836, 155851832, 155851785, 155851884, 155851790, 155851856, 155851847, 155851807, 155851810, 155851849, 155851818, 155851815, 155851889, 155851769, 155851844, 155851823, 15585... | |
| 155790549 by wiemzayati @ 2024-08-26 16:05 Active block | 1 | 2024-08-27 06:52 | didier2020 | Hello,Existing paths that you have modified are uploaded as new ways.this generates a very large quantity of duplicates (way or node).You need to fix this. check your changeset with josm |
| 2 | 2024-08-27 21:18 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 155851871, 155851861, 155851813, 155851893, 155851796, 155851836, 155851832, 155851785, 155851884, 155851790, 155851856, 155851847, 155851807, 155851810, 155851849, 155851818, 155851815, 155851889, 155851769, 155851844, 155851823, 15585... | |
| 155800361 by wiemzayati @ 2024-08-26 19:53 Active block | 1 | 2024-08-27 06:44 | didier2020 | Existing paths that you have modified are uploaded as new ways.this generates a very large quantity of duplicates (way or node). check your changeset with josm |
| 2 | 2024-08-27 21:18 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 155851871, 155851861, 155851813, 155851893, 155851796, 155851836, 155851832, 155851785, 155851884, 155851790, 155851856, 155851847, 155851807, 155851810, 155851849, 155851818, 155851815, 155851889, 155851769, 155851844, 155851823, 15585... | |
| 154468187 by didier2020 @ 2024-07-27 05:41 | 1 | 2024-07-27 16:41 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Can I ask how exactly you are determining that features are duplicates?For example, for this camera POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9442716021/history , the location here indeed has two cameras on either side of the shop doors: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=278736972142704... |
| 2 | 2024-07-28 14:09 | richlv ♦384 | Could it be safer to revert the changeset and redo valid fixes? | |
| 3 | 2024-07-29 13:05 | didier2020 | Hello,changeset is reverted.For example, for this camera POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9442716021https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9442707523this 2 node had exactly the same tags and exactly same geometry (lat and lon)so there are duplicated since you had to add another... | |
| 4 | 2024-07-29 13:19 | didier2020 | or change the lat and lon for ex, lat lon of nodes1812435083 and 1715103641 (right and left of the door of mapillary's photo) | |
| 149081481 by didier2020 @ 2024-03-24 10:10 | 1 | 2024-03-28 23:26 | Britzz ♦231 | Il semblerait que le passage de N162 à D962 soit effectif : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Route_nationale_162, êtes-vous sûr de vous ?Pour info, a été discuté sur https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/bonne-syntaxe-pour-le-cycle-de-vie-dune-reference/22211/ |
| 2 | 2024-03-29 18:33 | didier2020 | Bonsoir,voila mes sources :- dans la version de janvier 2024 (pas encore mise a disposition https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/bornage-du-reseau-routier-national/ )les axes "transférés" ne changent pas de nom et le gestionnaire devient le département a la place... | |
| 80812472 by didier2020 @ 2020-02-10 19:31 | 1 | 2023-11-09 18:08 | sahilister ♦30 | Hi didier2020, I know it's been a long time since you mapped this area in Bhuj, Gujarat, India but wanted to ask a few things regarding this changeset: I don't think, nor I am able to see Sector numbers in hundreds like "Sector 468" in other maps of Bhuj. From the source mark... |
| 2 | 2023-11-10 15:58 | didier2020 | Hello, i don't map the area, i've just fix an issue with the tag layer for landuses. I can't help you, sorry | |
| 3 | 2023-11-13 10:15 | adiatmad ♦446 | Hi sahilister, I stumbled upon this discussion and hope you don't mind if I jump in. I noticed that the user ALPZz added the name of Bhuj Sector 468 and more. Please check this (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/768640087) and (https://osmcha.org/changesets/80656357/). Perhaps they are... | |
| 143578147 by didier2020 @ 2023-11-03 14:43 | 1 | 2023-11-06 08:37 | AurélienQ ♦117 | Bonjour,Quelles sont tes sources ? Car lorsque je cherche sur internet je ne vois aucun site mentionnant que l'autoroute n'est pas classée comme tel. Et même, si elle est classée en tant que nationale, elle reste faite aux normes autoroutières et doit donc &e... |
| 2 | 2023-11-06 15:59 | didier2020 | presque ...: source terrain (photo déposés sur mapillary), il n'y a pas de panneau autoroute.Source Dirif : Arrêté interpréfectoral 486TX censé etre a la disposition du public (prefecture 95 et 77).Google et TomTom nomme le cer A104 alors qu'... | |
| 3 | 2023-11-06 16:08 | didier2020 | a voir sur l'axe, les petites étiquettes du terre plein central indique le nom de l'axe.mes photos n'ont pas permis de les visualiser correctement : N1104 PR 13https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=1044623213349693 | |
| 4 | 2023-11-06 18:53 | AurélienQ ♦117 | Super👍, merci pour cette réponse rapide et précise !J'ai vu que tu n'es déjà pas seul sur le coup, je ne m'en occupe donc pas. | |
| 5 | 2023-11-08 14:19 | didier2020 | Voila l'arrêté de mise en service :http://www.sytadin.fr/direct/communiques/arrete/AIP-DRIEAT-2023-DDT-SEMCV-436-TX.pdf | |
| 6 | 2023-11-08 18:20 | AurélienQ ♦117 | Merci beaucoup ! | |
| 143572272 by Sekundemal @ 2023-11-03 12:24 | 1 | 2023-11-04 09:24 | didier2020 | Hello,you're about uploading the same data "x" times. Bug with "android" ?Please stop and fix it. Thanks |
| 2 | 2023-11-04 09:26 | didier2020 | issues are on :http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?country=namibia&item=1230&source=&class=3orosmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?country=namibia&username=Sekundemal | |
| 3 | 2023-11-04 09:27 | didier2020 | or http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?country=namibia&item=xxxx&username=Sekundemal | |
| 4 | 2023-11-05 18:41 | Sekundemal ♦1 | Many thanks for notifying me. Seems to be a common bug with Every Door. I had about 90 old uploads re-uploading with every new change. Will prevent duplicates going forward and take it up with the app developers. | |
| 5 | 2023-11-06 05:49 | didier2020 | Thanks :-) | |
| 6 | 2023-11-13 19:53 | Sekundemal ♦1 | The issue is being looked into https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/discussions/676 | |
| 143624936 by Sekundemal @ 2023-11-04 18:14 | 1 | 2023-11-05 08:09 | didier2020 | please stop using Every Door Android 4.0there is 10 times the same datahttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11315126569 #DWG |
| 141297954 by Sebasawk @ 2023-09-15 11:11 | 1 | 2023-10-17 09:10 | didier2020 | Cette correction ne correspond pas a la description des routes N385, N186, A86, A4 et A3. Les références sont disponibles a cet adresse : https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/liaisons-du-reseau-routier-national/This correction does not correspond to the description of the N385, N1... |
| 2 | 2023-10-18 12:42 | Sebasawk ♦16 | Thank you for feedback. I will analyze situation and come back to you. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-20 16:19 | Sebasawk ♦16 | Hi dider2020,I have analyzed the situation and understand that your feedback is valid as per provided documents, I will refer this document for further mapping related to Ref information. Happy Mapping! | |
| 124841099 by didier2020 @ 2022-08-13 06:12 | 1 | 2022-11-28 22:03 | Carto'Cité ♦1,138 | Bonjour Didier,Je crois qu'une pratique pour les travaux pour ce type de cas (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085953521) est d'éviter de mettre access=no qui donne l'impression que la piste est privée ou interdite mais existante mais plutôt highway=constru... |
| 2 | 2022-12-06 09:00 | didier2020 | Bonjour, réponse tardive :la passerelle est en rénovation, l'itinéraire passe maintenant par le passe rive mais pas pour les vélo. La piste cyclable n'est pas en construction il y a des cabanes de chantier qui sont installés entourés par des barr... | |
| 3 | 2022-12-06 14:17 | CartoCharles ♦60 | Merci pour ton retour. Aucun problème pour le délai de réponse, je suis parfois beaucoup plus long que ça à répondre 😅Charles | |
| 87283332 by didier2020 @ 2020-06-29 09:03 | 1 | 2021-02-06 14:05 | Forest of Dean ♦3 | Bonjour,https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3333102/history lacks many inner elements. What to do? |
| 2 | 2021-02-06 16:22 | didier2020 | bonjour, je ne suis pas l'auteur de cette relation. J'ai simplement modifié le contour extérieur suite aux travaux en cours sur la N1194 au niveau de la commune du Mesnil-Amelot | |
| 97927890 by JRosinus @ 2021-01-21 21:11 | 1 | 2021-01-22 13:12 | ivanbranco ♦2,695 | Hi JRosinus,I think there's a problem with this relation tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12219191 |
| 2 | 2021-01-23 10:56 | didier2020 | Hi, there was a lot of duplicated relations, ways and nodes with your changesets, it's fixed in this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98014542. | |
| 89439561 by didier2020 @ 2020-08-15 08:48 | 1 | 2020-08-15 19:31 | Harvesterify ♦43 | Bonjour,Vous avez introduit des modifications incorrectes, notamment concernant la vitesse maximale autorisée (cette portion en particulier n'est pas limitée à 70 : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141874623). Pouvez vous corriger ?Merci. |
| 2 | 2020-08-15 20:26 | didier2020 | Bonjour, j'ai saisi les limitations de vitesse que j'ai vu vendredi.j'ai uploadé les photos sur mapillary si vous voulez vérifier. | |
| 3 | 2020-08-15 20:37 | Harvesterify ♦43 | Sachant que vous avez pris en photo un panneau 70 sans mention Rappel au niveau du rond point Jean Bertin (https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/didier2020?lat=48.668204&lng=2.1150440000000117&z=20&menu=true&focus=photo&pKey=c-ut91SQdpkSJcksp8SXCQ), dans le sens Limours -> Gometz... | |
| 4 | 2020-08-15 20:44 | Harvesterify ♦43 | Ah, mon mauvais, il y a bien un panneau 70 en sortie de Limours. Il me semblait pourtant qu'il y avait un panneau indiquant une fin de 70 plus loin justement, mais je n'en trouve pas trace... Mes excuses dans ce cas. | |
| 5 | 2020-08-15 20:49 | Harvesterify ♦43 | La limitation est d'autant plus étrange qu'elle n'existe pas dans le sens Gometz Limours en sortie du rond point Jean Bertin | |
| 6 | 2020-08-15 20:59 | Harvesterify ♦43 | C'est bien ce qu'il me semblait : dans l'autre sens, le premier panneau à 70 est bien plus loin (https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/didier2020?lat=48.65728251507246&lng=2.080084475458937&z=17&menu=true&focus=photo&pKey=i_C_U_LImAh4EtvZb32fsA), au niveau de l... | |
| 7 | 2020-08-16 10:39 | didier2020 | Bonjour,j'ai saisi les limitations par sens (ajout des panneaux et référnce mapillary) dans le changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89468051j'espere que c'est bon maintenant. | |
| 88071833 by didier2020 @ 2020-07-16 08:06 | 1 | 2020-07-20 16:20 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Could you check this node, it got a strange tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7719745062Thanks! |
| 2 | 2020-07-20 16:36 | didier2020 | "tatouage" is the name of our internal ref...thanks | |
| 86877905 by didier2020 @ 2020-06-19 12:38 | 1 | 2020-06-24 15:22 | StephaneP ♦467 | Bonjour Didier,Je vois que tu as modifié pas mal de cycleway=track en lane.Sur le terrain ça ressemble à quoi ? Parce que s'il s'agit d'un ajout de plots pour neutraliser de la place aux voies auto, et créer une "voie" vélo, alors o... |
| 2 | 2020-06-25 06:52 | didier2020 | Bonjour Stéphane,j'ai (mal?) modifié la description pour les vélo sur la D86 car j'ai vu que sur le trajet entre St Maur et Créteil (D86/D19) il y avait 2 façons de taguer le même type de "neutralisation" de voie pour les vé... | |
| 3 | 2020-06-26 12:34 | didier2020 | une image :https://images.mapillary.com/MZApmHaTcIz_4t3gSgRXUg/thumb-2048.jpg | |
| 4 | 2020-06-26 16:33 | StephaneP ♦467 | Merci pour les images. Ce n'est pas évident de choisir. J'en discute avec Charles et Antoine et peut-être Géovélo, et je reviens vers toi.Mais bon, dans tous les cas il n'y a pas d'urgence.A bientôtStéphane | |
| 5 | 2020-07-03 15:24 | StephaneP ♦467 | Voici le retour : Vu le caractère temporaire, on peut laisser ça en lane.Merci pour tes retoursStéphane | |
| 86461013 by Osmapas @ 2020-06-10 11:28 | 1 | 2020-06-12 06:16 | didier2020 | Hi,there is a lot of duplicated nodewith same ref JUPxxxx(one add a tag building and the other no)issues can be see athttp://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=brazil_mato_grosso_do_sul&item=1230&level=1%2C2%2C3have a look, and try to correct this. |
| 74493127 by didier2020 @ 2019-09-15 10:31 | 1 | 2020-04-18 17:23 | Super-Map ♦67 | Hi didier2020, A wrong keys have been used for this element, I will deleted the way for to "keep" one node only (for to keep the history). Bad use: "information=board", "tourism=information". Moreover, please check the ref and the operator and delete it if it's n... |
| 2 | 2020-04-19 06:06 | didier2020 | je ne vois pas en quoi les tags utilisés sont mauvais puisqu'il n'y en a pas de spécifique pour les pmv et pourquoi supposez vous que les données saisies sont erronnées ? je ne me permets pas de dire que j'ai raison, aussi si cela vous dérange, vou... | |
| 3 | 2020-04-19 06:10 | didier2020 | you can find all others with overpasshttp://overpass-turbo.eu/s/T1L | |
| 74580699 by didier2020 @ 2019-09-17 13:25 | 1 | 2020-04-18 15:29 | Super-Map ♦67 | Hi didier2020, I would like to inform you, you had used a wrong "key" for this element and it's appear to be a wrong "ref" (A4-A86) too... Effectively,: "information=board; tourism = information are wrong. Moreover. By advance, thank for your understanding. https://www.... |
| 2 | 2020-04-18 15:33 | Super-Map ♦67 | As you can see, everybody do "mistakes", this is the right imagery:https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=3a-lD_5b6tsqEu0anuKbrQ&lat=48.8053146428&lng=2.448939562239957&z=17 | |
| 3 | 2020-04-18 16:59 | didier2020 | bonjour,merci pour le signalement.je me suis trompé pour la localisation,c'est corrigé https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83749656.pour les tags, je n'ai rien trouvé de plus simple pour un panneau a message variable(https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panneau_... | |
| 81318615 by didier2020 @ 2020-02-21 13:07 | 1 | 2020-02-25 15:56 | Carto'Cité ♦1,138 | Bonjour.Je suis intrigué par ce chemin https://www.osm.org/way/775243530 qui en croise 2 autres sans qu'il n'y ait de bridge ou tunnel. En regardant sur la BDOrtho il semble que la liaison se situe entre les nodes https://www.osm.org/node/1925550192 et https://www.osm.org/node/192... |
| 2 | 2020-02-25 17:20 | didier2020 | bonjour,j'ai fais une mise a jour ici :https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81465652 | |
| 3 | 2020-02-25 18:03 | Carto'Cité ♦1,138 | Super, merci. | |
| 78430501 by didier2020 @ 2019-12-15 13:59 | 1 | 2019-12-17 23:06 | aceman444 ♦2,567 | Hi. Yes, railway=disused on a node looks wrong, but disused:railway=buffer_stop actually looks correct. Why did you remove it? The same with disused:railway=level_crossing. |
| 2 | 2019-12-18 08:04 | didier2020 | sorry, it's a mistakerevert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78567936 | |
| 77192622 by VaeroW @ 2019-11-17 15:58 | 1 | 2019-11-18 20:33 | didier2020 | Hi,there is something wrong with some of yours changeset (exactly same duplicated geometry and exactly same tags)http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#country=germany_bayern_mittelfranken&item=1230&level=1&zoom=16&lat=49.46147&lon=10.99536 |
| 76768157 by Ritu Shandilya @ 2019-11-07 16:26 | 1 | 2019-11-09 18:30 | FvGordon ♦217 | With Parkhaus 303 it looks like you have uploaded some levels multiple times, because I found the following ways of the north west spiral on top of each other, using the same nodes:Level 2: 742978846, 742643120Level 3: 742979579, 742967403, 742979267Level 4: 742979685, 742979701, 742967354, 74... |
| 2 | 2019-11-11 10:51 | didier2020 | hi,there is something wrong with yours changeset,there is multiple duplicated way (exactly same geometry and exactly same tags)like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742979880https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742980009https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742979986https://www.openstreetmap.o... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-12 11:55 | Nakaner-repair ♦8,261 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76957750 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Ritu Shandilya due to usage of buggy development application on production database uploading messy geometries. | |
| 74196126 by gfdklgdldsfgkgfd @ 2019-09-07 00:57 | 1 | 2019-09-07 09:50 | didier2020 | bonjour,il y a un probleme de doublon avec vos 2 changesets :https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74196041https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74196126erreur détecté grace a osmose :http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=france_poitou_charentes_vienne&a... |
| 2 | 2019-09-07 21:07 | gfdklgdldsfgkgfd ♦27 | corrigé via un revert des changset, erreur d'upload suite à un crash de josm. Je vais tout recommancer | |
| 73699885 by didier2020 @ 2019-08-24 16:36 | 1 | 2019-08-30 13:14 | Carto'Cité ♦1,138 | Bonjour.Tu as supprimé sur la voie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38781145 plusieurs tags dont oneway=yes, qui n'est pas par défaut selon le wiki qui précise bien "Ajouter oneway=yes ". C'est un peu dangereux non ?Antoine de Carto'Cité, p... |
| 2 | 2019-08-30 13:18 | Carto'Cité ♦1,138 | Bon en observant les autres bretelles je vois que c'est une maladresse : j'ai corrigé.Antoine. | |
| 3 | 2019-08-31 07:06 | didier2020 | Merci ! | |
| 70364433 by didier2020 @ 2019-05-17 16:12 | 1 | 2019-05-31 09:26 | pyrog ♦335 | Salut Didier,J'ai eu un problème avec JOSM lors de l'envoi de mes modifications.As-tu supprimé seulement les objets en doublon (poteaux de la ligne électrique, bornes de repérage du gazoduc) ou as-tu fait un reverse de tout le changeset ?Merci.Yv... |
| 2 | 2019-05-31 13:10 | didier2020 | Bonjour Yves,j'ai supprimé les objets en doublons dans ce changeset et aussi celui la : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/690564894cdlt,didier | |
| 70610358 by didier2020 @ 2019-05-25 12:35 | 1 | 2019-05-27 14:39 | Florimondable ♦126 | Bonjour, je ne suis pas convaincu par le tagging. Pour moi ça serait highway=motorway et access=private.Parce que ça reste une structurellement une autoroute et non une voie de service, avec un accès fermé au public. |
| 2 | 2019-05-27 17:20 | didier2020 | bonsoir,elle ne reste pas une route :http://www.montreuil.fr/outils/actualites/article/fermeture-definitive-de-la-a186-les-travaux-de-prolongement-du-tramway-t1-commencent/ | |
| 3 | 2019-05-28 08:17 | Florimondable ♦126 | Openstreetmap doit refléter la réalité à ce jour pas le futur ni le passé. Aujourd'hui j'imagine (je ne suis pas allé sur le terrain mais votre lien me confirme cela) que l'autoroute et encore en presque totalité à l'é... | |
| 4 | 2019-05-28 19:13 | didier2020 | Ca ne me dérange pas que vous fassiez ces modifications. | |
| 70520824 by didier2020 @ 2019-05-22 16:04 | 1 | 2019-05-22 16:09 | didier2020 | détection des erreurs :http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?source=3690&item=1230&class=5&start_date=2019-03 |
| 69869253 by didier2020 @ 2019-05-04 08:51 | 1 | 2019-05-05 09:41 | geow ♦446 | Hi didier2020, wow, thanks for fixing this.Just curious: Do you know if the numerous duplicates are due to a systematic error?Thanksgeow |
| 2 | 2019-05-05 09:46 | geow ♦446 | BTW...I came across your work byhttp://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries&country=Nepal | |
| 3 | 2019-05-07 07:55 | didier2020 | Hi, it's not systematic. It's in a changeset with duplicated way or 2 (or more) uploads with same data ...Large errors are on buildings and trees. | |
| 4 | 2019-05-07 07:59 | didier2020 | you can look at :http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?country=nepal&item=1230,0http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=nepal&item=1230,0 | |
| 68833754 by AJA21 @ 2019-04-03 11:23 | 1 | 2019-04-04 07:24 | didier2020 | Bonjour,grace a osmose,http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?source=407527&item=1230&class=3j'ai vu que vous aviez déjà "uploadé" ces adresses dans un autre changeset :https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68833754https://www.openstreetmap.... |
| 2 | 2019-04-04 19:27 | AJA21 ♦8 | oups j ai cru avoir fait Appoigny merci pour la correction | |
| 68466379 by onee1234 @ 2019-03-24 10:17 | 1 | 2019-03-25 17:56 | didier2020 | hi,there is a lot off mistakes in your changesets like : - adding tags building for all way and nodes in larges area. - deleting tags highway for several roads.ask for help if you just want to addthe tag building on closed way with only the tag area=yes |
| 2 | 2019-03-27 18:48 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 68543981, 68570121, 68576960, 68527856, 68530448, 68518563, 68550459, 68557308, 68533311, 68563156, 68567349, 68524407, 68537615 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some new user add a building tag to every node edits in Thailand.... | |
| 68251806 by didier2020 @ 2019-03-18 09:16 | 1 | 2019-03-18 11:07 | wille ♦523 | Hi Didier,Thanks for fixing it. I invite you to use OSMCha and mark the changesets that you review as bad/good and add the "Resolved" tag to the ones that you fix.thank you very much! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://... |
| 2 | 2019-03-18 17:45 | didier2020 | hello, i write to the user in this chanf=gesethttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68230533 | |
| 68230533 by onee1234 @ 2019-03-17 15:07 | 1 | 2019-03-18 09:14 | didier2020 | hi,you add tag building on nodes and highways,it's a mistake :http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?source=5820&item=4090&class=1i corrected in several changeset and it's now fixed |
| 2 | 2019-03-27 18:48 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 68543981, 68570121, 68576960, 68527856, 68530448, 68518563, 68550459, 68557308, 68533311, 68563156, 68567349, 68524407, 68537615 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some new user add a building tag to every node edits in Thailand.... | |
| 67436644 by Menir_PMI @ 2019-02-21 17:06 | 1 | 2019-02-21 20:38 | didier2020 | hi,- you upload large changeset with no tags like way 672074809- there is also duplicated way geometry and tags (more than 4 times)it's seams to be import , so you had to seehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import |
| 65477698 by addr2osm @ 2018-12-14 15:52 | 1 | 2018-12-22 16:04 | didier2020 | hi,you create new addresses when they already existdifference is the tag "source:date"likehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6137555771https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5923292365 |
| 2 | 2018-12-22 16:05 | didier2020 | likehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6137555771/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5923292365 | |
| 3 | 2018-12-22 18:03 | addr2osm ♦11 | Ok, I will make sure that source tags are disregarded during the import. Thanks. | |
| 63833260 by didier2020 @ 2018-10-24 13:36 | 1 | 2018-11-10 08:45 | cquest ♦270 | landuse/building = retail et pas commercial (faux-ami à utiliser pour les bureaux) !Moi qui voulais aller mapper ce coin, c'est loupé, tu as tout fait ;) |
| 2 | 2018-11-11 16:45 | didier2020 | désolaye ;-) | |
| 63950229 by Globeur @ 2018-10-28 13:22 | 1 | 2018-11-02 21:40 | didier2020 | Bonjour,faire attention a l'envoie d'adresse en doublehttp://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?source=2370&item=1230&class=3&start_date=2018-10http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?source=2374&item=1230&class=3&start_date=2018-10 |
| 62280902 by didier2020 @ 2018-09-04 14:00 | 1 | 2018-09-04 14:03 | didier2020 | changeset to fix osmose errors like http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?source=7196&item=1230&class=5&start_date=2018-08http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?source=7184&item=4090&class=1&start_date=2018 |
| 61983827 by Cascafico @ 2018-08-25 12:31 | 1 | 2018-08-25 16:12 | bubix ♦88 | Anche se non avessi dovuto essere Attila questo nodo 5856454180 l'ho evidentemente aggiornato male perché l'importo ha duplicato il distributore. Questo modo é da cancellare. Bubix in vacanza... |
| 2 | 2018-08-27 08:46 | tyr_asd ♦440 | Hi. A few questions: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385683058 looks odd: A building way with only two nodes? It looks like you probably used outdated OSM data for the conflation process?! It looks like this osm way would have been the right one to update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6189495... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-27 08:48 | tyr_asd ♦440 | PS: Any reason why you used another account to upload these changes and not "attilaimport" (as in your first two changesets, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61948858) as described in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/ItalyFuelStations#Dedicated_upload_accoun... | |
| 4 | 2018-08-27 08:54 | tyr_asd ♦440 | PSS: Here you also have re-created one fuel station that I've deleted on purpose last week because the import location was wrong (or very much outdated) and the fuel station was already mapped in OSM at the correct location.This is my changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61958... | |
| 5 | 2018-08-27 09:12 | attilaimport ♦1 | Hi,some time passed for having, say, 10.000 out of 20.000 POIs reviewed by audit, so this could have caused intermediate editings to be overwritten.About using another account, my mistake: using different machines, I forgot to update JOSM configuration in one of them.About duplicates, we... | |
| 6 | 2018-08-27 17:07 | didier2020 | a lot of duplicated nodes since your "job" ! http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?item=1230&class=3&country=italy_*&start_date=2018-08 | |
| 7 | 2018-08-29 19:40 | luschi ♦417 | @attilaimport/Attila_import and Cascafico: why do you use "ref:mise"?for me this looks like a number only used from MISE. For me this key make no sense. I can not see this number on the fuel station and also is this number not visible on the receipt.Have you planned to del... | |
| 8 | 2018-08-29 19:48 | Cascafico ♦577 | @luschiWell, even postcode is only used by Poste Italiane and is not visible in city limit billboards. | |
| 9 | 2018-08-29 20:34 | luschi ♦417 | lolpostcode is used all over the world and they are used by Poste Italiane, DHL, Fedex, Bartolini, GLS, UPS, Hermes, SDA, Cinese Post, etc. There is no company they use his own number to find a address... Postcodes are a global approved number.Internal number of MISE is only used from MISE... | |
| 10 | 2018-08-30 08:46 | Cascafico ♦577 | @luschishould I start deleting all this stuff?https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=ref%3A | |
| 11 | 2018-08-30 17:05 | luschi ♦417 | no.There are a lot of tagging what are used only in one country or only by one user or as a not good preparation before data import.So I think we should not add a new "nonsense" tagging to the OSM database. | |
| 54337344 by didier2020 @ 2017-12-04 17:51 | 1 | 2017-12-04 17:53 | didier2020 | user or Vespucci bug ? |
| 54336706 by didier2020 @ 2017-12-04 17:27 | 1 | 2017-12-04 17:53 | didier2020 | user or Vespucci bug ? |
| 51032894 by htonchia @ 2017-08-11 12:44 | 1 | 2017-11-23 16:52 | didier2020 | cette route est trunk : pas une voie express.https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.75345688888889&lng=2.378530527777778&z=17&pKey=hMo1BJp22Qh2m3lJLSzmbw&focus=photoCette route est la N186 (voir &tiquette des points repères sur le terre plein central , visible sur le ... |
| 2 | 2017-11-23 17:57 | htonchia ♦2 | Bonjour,Il n'y a aucun doute sur le fait que la route passe de A86 a N186 sur le tronçon.Par contre les changements ne semblent pas cohérents entre la branche nord et la branche sud et à certains endroits on a même en // la N186 et l'A86 dans la branche sud.\... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-23 19:45 | didier2020 | .. à penser ... | |
| 54030943 by didier2020 @ 2017-11-23 17:05 | 1 | 2017-11-23 17:08 | didier2020 | panneau de fin de voie express :https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.625661666666666&lng=2.3381825000000003&z=17&pKey=t5tIuvxkaz72JnXgzTpVnQ&focus=photo |
| 53455604 by Santi Benejam @ 2017-11-02 15:55 | 1 | 2017-11-03 10:10 | Santi Benejam ♦1 | Can anyone delete this changeset?. |
| 2 | 2017-11-04 16:55 | didier2020 | done in this changesethttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53509161 | |
| 52898268 by OSM Projeto @ 2017-10-13 15:27 | 1 | 2017-10-13 15:34 | didier2020 | hi,your data is an importthere is no source for your tags "Layer" or "EntityHand"there is a lot of nodes with wrongs tags like this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5165539277can you fix this ? |
| 52046206 by didier2020 @ 2017-09-14 17:57 | 1 | 2017-09-15 10:53 | wambacher ♦435 | Hi Didier, i know that you are a experenced mapper, but last day you did a lot of errors in DOM.you "killed" 18 (eighteen!!) AL4-Boundaries in DOM by changing them without care.see list: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1021-countries-compare-2017-09-15al... |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 12:10 | didier2020 | Hi, thanks for your message. Work is in progress. All will be ok in a few day. | |
| 51897302 by Mansmhmd @ 2017-09-10 05:07 | 1 | 2017-09-12 18:18 | didier2020 | hi, you upload same data several timesyou can see issues athttp://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/?username=Mansmhmd# |
| 51522361 by Zibi-importy @ 2017-08-28 21:23 | 1 | 2017-08-29 18:14 | didier2020 | hello,i've fixed duplicated adress from your import you can see it for example athttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51552208best regards didier |
| 2 | 2017-08-31 12:19 | Zbigniew_Cz ♦974 | Thanks :-) | |
| 50703249 by ArjanO @ 2017-07-30 21:16 | 1 | 2017-08-03 05:53 | didier2020 | Hi, you upload multiple nodes at the same x,y - with near same tags : Id or id- with no main tag : street_lamp- duplicated |
| 2 | 2017-08-03 05:55 | didier2020 | graph of issues :http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?country=netherlands_utrecht&item=1230&start_date=2017-07 | |
| 3 | 2017-08-08 14:19 | ArjanO ♦4 | I guess something went wrong with an import.Point taken.best regards,Arjano | |
| 4 | 2017-08-11 12:00 | escada ♦168 | Is there a page where the import was discussed before execution ? | |
| 50535860 by ArjanO @ 2017-07-24 18:13 | 1 | 2017-07-26 15:59 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Hi,something went wrong here. There are 160 nodes on the same spot, all with a lot of foreign tags which don't look like they belong to OSM:http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4990832927Jan |
| 2 | 2017-07-26 16:02 | mueschel ♦6,565 | PS: I doubt that these lights are 4.5 km high. 'height' uses meter as units, not millimeters. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-28 13:58 | didier2020 | i fix height in this changeset 50650261 | |
| 4 | 2017-08-08 14:20 | ArjanO ♦4 | I guess something went wrong with an import.Point taken.best regards,Arjano | |
| 50130355 by amisha2016 @ 2017-07-08 12:01 | 1 | 2017-07-10 12:30 | didier2020 | hi,in this changeset/area there is- duplicated way (géometry and tags)- duplicated nodes (géometry and tags)- Way node tagged like waylike this http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7381948i think it's an import and not source=knowledgeCan you fix all this iss... |
| 2 | 2017-07-10 12:31 | didier2020 | major issues are on osmose :- http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=india_punjab&item=1230- http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?source=17424&item=4090&class=1 | |
| 3 | 2017-07-10 18:03 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | @didier2020 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1400 (which has now been read). | |
| 4 | 2017-07-10 18:37 | amisha2016 ♦2 | @SomeoneElse Shall I revert the changeset 50130355?Procedure following:-1. In JOSM, downloaded the plugin reverter2. Revert the changeset 50130553. UploadI have not uploaded yet. If you say I will upload it. | |
| 5 | 2017-07-10 19:35 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Since there are a few problems, and there are also "fixup" edits by other mappers since, it might be easier if I did it. I'll be in a position to do it in a couple of hours. | |
| 6 | 2017-07-10 23:23 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India. | |
| 7 | 2017-07-11 08:02 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | OK, all now finally complete. There were a significant number of problems here.Firstly, before doing any sort of import you'll need to read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import , https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edi... | |
| 41195794 by didier2020 @ 2016-08-02 16:16 | 1 | 2016-08-04 10:54 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Hi,could you check the tagging of these parking:lane? E.g.http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29015063As far as I know it should be parking:condition:right=disc (no ":1.5") in the key. Also, the maxstay should have a unit - some pages in the wiki suggest minutes as default, but your tag... |
| 2 | 2016-08-04 16:23 | didier2020 | hi,it was sure i do mistake with this tags ! | |
| 41115396 by botdidier2020 @ 2016-07-29 18:26 | 1 | 2016-07-29 20:42 | scai ♦267 | Can you please at least use English changeset comments when editing in Germany? |
| 2 | 2016-07-30 03:44 | didier2020 | fix nodes with duplicated geometry and tags/values you can see fixed issues there:http://dev.osmose.frontend.dirif.info/en/errors/done?country=germany*&item=1230&class=3(for a few day) | |
| 41115387 by botdidier2020 @ 2016-07-29 18:26 | 1 | 2016-07-29 20:42 | scai ♦267 | Can you please at least use English changeset comments when editing in Germany? |
| 2 | 2016-07-29 22:03 | MKnight ♦909 | scai: die englische Beschreibung findet sich auf der wikiseite.dieser CS hier ist übrigens weitgehend identisch zu einem revert im Februar: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37478950 mal schauen, ob/was da kommt. Die Daten hier sehen nach 5 Stichproben allerdings schlüssig un... | |
| 3 | 2016-07-30 03:39 | didier2020 | fix (ways or nodes) Duplicated geometry and tags/values issues is from a personnal osmose analyser ("official" osmose analyseur detect duplicated geom error only for way at this time)you can see fixed issues there:http://dev.osmose.frontend.dirif.info/en/errors/done?country=germany*&... | |
| 35785865 by didier2020 @ 2015-12-06 13:41 | 1 | 2016-04-11 14:08 | djana ♦2 | I notice one small mistake in this changeset: a old building has been re-introduced (Building #384559427) on the map (has been tore down for more than 2 yrs). So there might be other issues: the satellite image still show the old building. I'll to fix the school complex to which this building u... |
| 2 | 2016-04-11 20:36 | didier2020 | as you can see :http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384559427/historyi've just fixed- name = 0- type = 0- id = xxx without source | |
| 3 | 2016-04-11 21:21 | djana ♦2 | Thanks! I cannot see the change yet. I am guessing it will take a little time till the map is updated. | |
| 37518262 by loumoi @ 2016-02-29 10:30 | 1 | 2016-03-17 08:12 | didier2020 | bonjour,dans ce changeset, les routes ajoutées sont dupliquées avec des routes déja existantes...il "suffit" d'utiliser la validation dans josm pour identifier ces erreurs; josm permet meme de faire automatiquement les corrections. |
| 36854085 by martine lilika @ 2016-01-28 10:45 | 1 | 2016-01-29 07:56 | didier2020 | hi,there is a lot of duplicated buildings in this changeset :https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36854085and between this otherhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36815838exemple :http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393608193http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394333140http://ww... |
| 36736611 by laureane @ 2016-01-22 11:18 | 1 | 2016-01-26 13:24 | didier2020 | hi,be carefull when you upload data , there is a lot off duplicated buildings.(you can use validator with josm before upload, josm do the job) |
| 36793426 by kamone @ 2016-01-25 10:53 | 1 | 2016-01-26 13:17 | didier2020 | hi,be carefull when you upload data , there is a lot off duplicated buildings.(you can use validator with josm before upload, josm do the job) |
| 36743170 by didier2020 @ 2016-01-22 16:57 | 1 | 2016-01-24 16:03 | Sanderd17 ♦39 | Hi, I see you fixed some issues in this region. Do you have more info on what went wrong?Would you want to join the discussions at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_landuse_import and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_buildi... |
| 2 | 2016-01-24 18:09 | didier2020 | i detect with osmose duplicated buidlings with this usershttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kamonehttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/angelin%20zeghahttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/laureaneans duplicated ways landuse with this usershttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bdiscoehttp://www.o... | |
| 36422202 by saikabhi @ 2016-01-07 11:43 | 1 | 2016-01-16 09:38 | didier2020 | the way 390035658 is not a building,can you find better tag ?thanks |
| 2 | 2016-01-17 07:52 | saikabhi ♦159 | Thank you for the feedback and pointing the error out to me. It was an oversight on my part. Have removed the invalid building. The changes are reflected in this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36628736 | |
| 35772664 by Luís Carlos Madeira @ 2015-12-05 17:11 | 1 | 2015-12-05 18:18 | didier2020 | can you fix this for nodes :- there is tags building on nodescan you fix this for way :- name = 0- type = 0- id = xxx without sourcethank's |
| 35751556 by Luís Carlos Madeira @ 2015-12-04 16:44 | 1 | 2015-12-04 21:58 | didier2020 | it's a test ?- there is no building on bing- nodes had tags building (fixed) |
| 2 | 2015-12-05 17:32 | Luís Carlos Madeira ♦1 | Please do not consider those buildings, they dont belong to that area. That's why you cant find buildings in Bing. | |
| 3 | 2015-12-07 00:02 | SimonPoole ♦339 | @Luis could you explain what you were trying to do? While the changeset has been reverted (thanks @didier2020) what ever you were doing went very wrong. | |
| 35731411 by cquest @ 2015-12-03 17:17 | 1 | 2015-12-03 20:09 | didier2020 | il manque Ville d'automne ?http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35731411#map=13/44.6369/-1.1718 |
| 35605310 by ccjjmartin_atxbuildings @ 2015-11-27 06:26 | 1 | 2015-11-29 15:36 | didier2020 | this changeset contains duplicated wayfixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35647756 |
| 35584350 by patisilva_atxbuildings @ 2015-11-26 04:28 | 1 | 2015-11-27 14:14 | didier2020 | this changeset genererate duplicated way fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35612012 |
| 35560352 by patisilva_atxbuildings @ 2015-11-24 21:24 | 1 | 2015-11-26 16:35 | didier2020 | this changeset seems to be egals to http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35542766. |
| 35519259 by ccjjmartin__atxbuildings @ 2015-11-22 22:36 | 1 | 2015-11-24 10:32 | didier2020 | this changeset contains duplicated building.I fix it in :http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35547413 |
| 35434843 by Mat Marçal @ 2015-11-19 13:54 | 1 | 2015-11-23 17:10 | didier2020 | bonjour,les noeuds des batiments avec le tag building et certains batiments étaient en double,j'ai efféctué les corrections dans ce changeset:http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35534613 |
| 35082117 by snapping @ 2015-11-04 15:55 | 1 | 2015-11-18 18:15 | didier2020 | a you can see http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?source=2398&item=1230&class=1there is a lot off duplicated way you can fix it ? |
| 7267931 by didier2020 @ 2011-02-12 18:40 | 1 | 2015-11-15 20:39 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review:This way is tagged highway=ford , but no waterway is mapped close to it:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99374581 |
| 2 | 2015-11-15 22:18 | didier2020 | i "map" what i see in my hollidays ... highway-> ford whas easy but i don't know the area of the water and i can't see water with bing .... | |
| 3 | 2015-11-15 22:24 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Maybe the way was just flooded with rain? | |
| 34922545 by NicolasMique @ 2015-10-28 09:59 | 1 | 2015-10-29 06:26 | didier2020 | les tags buildings et source sont en trop sur les ways composants les batiments |
| 34928798 by NicolasMique @ 2015-10-28 15:11 | 1 | 2015-10-29 06:24 | didier2020 | il ne faut pas ajouter le tag building=house sur les noeuds composants un way qui a déja ce tag |
| 34428457 by LeTopographeFou @ 2015-10-04 14:08 | 1 | 2015-10-05 17:21 | didier2020 | c'est plutot UnQuality Assurance on trees :nodes with tag leaf_type=broadleavedcomme celui-la : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2640855577 |
| 2 | 2015-10-07 21:00 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | @LeTopographeFou - are you going to correct the errors that you've introduced in this changeset (as identified by didier2020 ) or do you need help doing so? Please also do reply to the changeset discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34479372 .Best Regards,Andy Townsend (Som... | |
| 3 | 2015-10-08 23:24 | LeTopographeFou ♦81 | I don't understand what didier2020 expects from me and where I have introduced any error. I only understand that I should have commented better m'y changeset. | |
| 4 | 2015-10-09 11:38 | didier2020 | en regardant l'historique ce node:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2640855577/historyon voit que tag leaft_type=boradleveled a été ajouté dans ce changeset, alors que seul le way aurait du être modifié. | |
| 5 | 2015-10-27 12:37 | LeTopographeFou ♦81 | Ok, thank you for the fix | |
| 30299573 by Rodarte! @ 2015-04-18 03:50 | 1 | 2015-04-18 07:16 | didier2020 | script with bug or is there a troll in your house ? |
| 28448670 by JLZIMMERMANN @ 2015-01-27 18:50 | 1 | 2015-01-28 19:34 | didier2020 | importer des batiments c'est bien, regarder s'il y en a pas déjà c'est mieux ... non ?http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#zoom=13&lat=44.0511136942087&lon=4.01982479876925&item=0 |
| 27760866 by Minie-Mini @ 2014-12-28 19:00 | 1 | 2014-12-30 14:32 | didier2020 | j'ai corrigé ce changeset : 3 relations ayant le meme nom .- les relations des 4 anciennes communes sont restaurée mais en admin_level=9- création nouvelle relation Boischampré en admin_level=8. |
| 2 | 2015-02-13 18:00 | Minie-Mini ♦4 | Parfait |