| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 134638169 by JJFiske @ 2023-04-08 04:06 | 1 | 2025-06-08 21:11 | LeTopographeFou | Hello, according to the website of this company (https://www.yorkspacesystems.com/contact) this business is at this address. Can you please expand on why it was "incorrectly placed" and why you preferred to delete instead of moving it? Tell me if I should restore this node. |
| 144604414 by LeTopographeFou @ 2023-11-29 21:26 | 1 | 2023-12-19 20:48 | mottiger ♦39 | HöiDu hast in diesem CS einige highway=give_way direkt auf Kreuzungsnodes gesetzt. Wie ist das zu interpretieren?Liebe Grüsse |
| 2 | 2024-02-04 22:21 | LeTopographeFou | Hello, I put the tag at the intersection since it is painted on the road that all roads have to give way. That's a way to not put one on each way, especially since there is no official positon. Similar to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop#All-way_stop, but not documented. | |
| 3 | 2024-02-04 23:03 | mottiger ♦39 | Thanks for the information.Makes sense. | |
| 137713624 by LeTopographeFou @ 2023-06-24 08:44 | 1 | 2023-06-26 12:55 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | I agree that "historic=bridge_site" makes more sense than "historic=bridge site", but when you're changing tags like this it would make sense to contact people who are actually consuming the data.In this case, if you go to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/historic=br... |
| 2 | 2023-07-04 19:14 | LeTopographeFou | Hello, yes I know this feature but did not check since I was not expecting any project to use such non canonical key-value without also handling the canonical form. Also, all the projects here are refering to historic=*, not this specific value (which makes me realize that TagInfo is misleading by h... | |
| 86095372 by LeTopographeFou @ 2020-06-02 19:31 | 1 | 2023-05-25 18:16 | heretofore ♦25 | Are they still here? The website lists a different address now. |
| 2 | 2023-05-28 19:31 | LeTopographeFou | I have no idea. The website now shows an address in Washington while their LinkedIn points to Alexandria. I think you can move this office to the Washington address. | |
| 136014088 by Stans @ 2023-05-12 11:27 | 1 | 2023-05-28 16:45 | LeTopographeFou | Hello, I'm sure this is an error, not sure how it happened. Can you please fix this? |
| 2 | 2023-05-29 13:59 | Stans ♦7 | Sieht doch spannend aus ;)Auf jeden Fall kann ich mir keine Reim machen, wie das zustandegekommen. ist. Darf gelöscht werden. :) | |
| 117959541 by Zcor @ 2022-02-28 21:13 | 1 | 2023-01-28 22:28 | LeTopographeFou | Hello Zcor, you deleted the Space Research and Communication Center. Can you please provide a rationale for that feature which as far as I know is there? |
| 97129690 by benpri @ 2021-01-07 20:42 | 1 | 2023-01-20 20:59 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour Benoît, dans ce changeset 2 places de parkings ont été ajoutées avec le tag "parking_space=normalPorte_du_Grand_Lyon". N'est-ce pas plutôt "parking_space=normal" et le reste est une erreur ? |
| 2 | 2023-01-21 06:30 | benpri ♦23 | Hello, Oui pb de copier/coller avec ID. Ca m'est arrivé plusieurs fois, j'ai corrigé mais j'ai du en laisser ici et là.Merci d'avoir vu. Je corrige si tu ne l'as pas encore faite. Bien à toi. | |
| 124358937 by benpri @ 2022-08-01 18:01 | 1 | 2023-01-20 20:55 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour Benoît, dans ce changeset 9 places de parkings ont été ajoutées avec le tag "parking_space=normalles_plantes". N'est-ce pas plutôt "parking_space=normal" et le reste est une erreur ? |
| 2 | 2023-01-21 07:02 | benpri ♦23 | Corrigé merci :) Bien vu. | |
| 124261252 by benpri @ 2022-07-30 09:51 | 1 | 2023-01-20 20:53 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour Benoît, dans ce changeset 11 places de parkings ont été ajoutées avec le tag "parking_space=normalanne-marie_garatanne-marie_garat". N'est-ce pas plutôt "parking_space=normal" et le reste est une erreur ? |
| 2 | 2023-01-21 06:58 | benpri ♦23 | Même souci de C/C avec ID, corrigé. Merci encore. | |
| 124349236 by benpri @ 2022-08-01 14:25 | 1 | 2023-01-20 20:50 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour Benoît, dans ce changeset 4 places de parkings ont été ajoutées avec le tag "parking_space=normalramp:wheelchair". N'est-ce pas plutôt "parking_space=normal" + "ramp:wheelchair=<quelquechose>" ? |
| 2 | 2023-01-21 06:55 | benpri ♦23 | Même souci de copié/collé sous ID. Merci d'avoir vu. Corrigé. | |
| 130585023 by res51 @ 2022-12-28 06:54 | 1 | 2023-01-08 21:35 | LeTopographeFou | Hello res51 and welcome in OSM!For your interest address Büntistrasse 14 was already there as a property of the building, consequently there was no need to create a new node for it. I deleted it. |
| 130584967 by res51 @ 2022-12-28 06:52 | 1 | 2023-01-08 21:34 | LeTopographeFou | Hello res51 and welcome in OSM!For your interest address Büntistrasse 12 was already there as a property of the building, consequently there was no need to create a new node for it. I deleted it. |
| 113641814 by Quiligus @ 2021-11-11 08:58 | 1 | 2021-11-13 11:06 | mueschel ♦6,574 | Hi,it seems this edit went wrong - all these nodes only have a foreign tag but nothing describing what they actually represent. |
| 2 | 2021-11-29 08:39 | Quiligus ♦1 | Hi,These are billboards. I am a green bean and I need some assistance to correct this problem. What can I do to "describe what they actually represent" ? | |
| 3 | 2021-11-29 08:40 | Quiligus ♦1 | Hi,What do you mean by "foreign tag" ? | |
| 4 | 2021-11-29 18:29 | mueschel ♦6,574 | Hi,the tags for describing a billboard can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:advertising%3DbillboardWith "foreign tags" I mean tags that are not used in OSM and don't fit to common tagging schemes, like the tag "affichage" you used here.To ge... | |
| 5 | 2021-11-30 07:16 | Quiligus ♦1 | Hi,Thanks for quick answer. I am still confused. I have been trying different modifications as you will notice but no change appears on my contribution map. Need some more tips. Thanks in advance. | |
| 6 | 2021-12-07 21:02 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour Quiligus et bienvenue !1. Par "foreign" je pense qu'il faut comprendre "étrange". Quel est le sens de ces clés "affichage" ? Est-ce une référence ? Le nom du panneau ?... Il doit sûrement y avoir une clé plus app... | |
| 7 | 2021-12-08 08:22 | Quiligus ♦1 | Bonjour LeTopographeFou,Merci pour ta réponse détaillée. Pour répondre à tes 2 questions :1) Je ne savais pas trop quoi mettre et je pensais que je pouvais saisir ce que je voulais dans le champs. L'objet de cette carte est de localiser les panneaux d�... | |
| 103588968 by LeTopographeFou @ 2021-04-25 19:25 | 1 | 2021-04-26 10:39 | Super-Map ♦67 | It's appear, you don't like my "WORK"!... So, if you are able to do "better", do it!... it's 'easy to "destroy" something, harder to make "better, harder for a "children", but you "aren't"... So when you touch something ... |
| 2 | 2021-04-29 19:41 | Scale and Scope ♦1 | LeTopographeFou talks less and already does better (more precise) landuses than Super-Map ... https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103588968 | |
| 3 | 2021-04-30 18:25 | LeTopographeFou | Hi Super-map, I must admit I don't fully understand your message... OSM is a collaborative project where everyone is free to add its details (as soon as it is relevent and true of course) and where everyone disserves to be treated kindly. I don't understand why you shoot at me. You even fo... | |
| 4 | 2021-05-03 09:58 | Super-Map ♦67 | Sorry, but you aren't a "newbie", you're contributor of OSM since August 24, 2015 , this is the first "reason", secondly, I'm not your "TEACHER", you and not only... when some persons receive a WAGE for this project and are "UNABLE" to map... do... | |
| 5 | 2021-05-03 10:27 | Super-Map ♦67 | If you haven't "time", it's simple, put a "note" one the map or "FIXME"!... | |
| 6 | 2021-05-03 10:32 | Super-Map ♦67 | Hi Scale and Scope and WELCOME! Rule number one, don't try to go too faster and follow the "WIKI", thanks for your "comment", have a nice day! | |
| 7 | 2021-05-14 20:30 | LeTopographeFou | Hi Super-Map, let put aside off-topic comments on Covid, crisis, democracy... to focus on mapping. I'm sincerily sorry to hear that you are suffering from the situation (and please imagine that I might also suffer...) but please here focus on what is related to mapping.1. Once again OSM is ... | |
| 8 | 2021-05-21 19:40 | Super-Map ♦67 | Oh! YOUR SO KIND!... First, your "wrong", secondly: "your wrong"... And I haven't' any more explanation for you, because I'm not a "teacher".... I receive "no wage" for to IMPROVE this map and not the contrary... and YES it's Île de F... | |
| 9 | 2021-05-21 19:49 | Super-Map ♦67 | I know, you use: "StreetComplete 31.3"... Look the map before to make any change... I can't help you even if "apparently" you like this project and we share the same "passion"... I can give you more "explanations"... | |
| 10 | 2021-05-21 19:53 | Super-Map ♦67 | I "cant" give you, precisely... I don't like this project, I LOVE it! Because I know the "goal"... and because you must "thinking", before to make anything and avoid to make more "mistakes" on the map and you must "thinking" for to be able to m... | |
| 90306046 by Richard_L @ 2020-09-02 12:59 | 1 | 2021-04-12 22:13 | LeTopographeFou | Hi,Thanks for adding this rocket (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7868546332) into OSM but unfortunately you defined it with aeroway=spaceport, i.e. an installation used to launch vehicles into space, which it is not here. I think that man_made=rocket and/or tourism=artwork and/or artwork_type=... |
| 2 | 2021-04-12 23:17 | Richard_L ♦1 | LeTopographeFou,You are right. It is a real rocket, but the pad is much too small for launching and was never intended for such. I'm afraid I was being overly optimistic. I hope I did not trick you into attempting a landing there. I went with your suggested man_made=rocket. Thank you. | |
| 3 | 2021-04-13 06:34 | LeTopographeFou | Thanks ! Hopefully we have here a procedure to follow which imply to first overpass the landing point before making an attempt in order to check if parking pad is free and to scare wild life and autochtones (I had some issues in the past with my breaking rockets...). Or maybe it was while surveying ... | |
| 98158723 by Arlo James Barnes @ 2021-01-26 09:19 | 1 | 2021-04-12 22:05 | LeTopographeFou | Hi,You created a Spaceport in node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4071739591 . I doubt there are installations to launch rockets or launch vehicles into space in this urban neighborood. I think aeroway=spaceport was probably not the tag you wanted to use. Can you please have a look and fix thi... |
| 99689719 by SteelNiner @ 2021-02-21 17:00 | 1 | 2021-04-12 22:00 | LeTopographeFou | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap project!You created a node in this first changeset but this node has been defined as a spaceport (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dspaceport) i.e. an installation where rockets / launch vehicles are sent to space. I'm quite confident that the... |
| 101596060 by Hydrel @ 2021-03-23 19:50 | 1 | 2021-03-27 14:16 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour,Vous avez fusionnés deux entités différentes sur un même noeud : le CNES et le COSPAR, associant qui plus est un identifiant wikidata/Wikipédia pour les deux entités, ce qui n'est pas exact. Deux organisations résidant à la m&ec... |
| 2 | 2021-03-27 14:30 | Hydrel ♦5 | Bonjour, j'ai du commettre une erreur j'ai du juger un peut trop vite les deux nœuds comme des doublons. Je vous remercie par avance pour la correction. | |
| 3 | 2021-03-27 14:44 | LeTopographeFou | Merci pour ce retour rapide, c'est corrigé en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101839720C'est vrai que le fait que ce soit le CNES qui héberge le site de cette organisation internationale est trompeur. Bonne fin de journée. | |
| 62900682 by katpatuka @ 2018-09-25 04:48 | 1 | 2021-03-11 20:49 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, you created two different areas nine and four years ago for Taiyuan Satellite Launch Centre: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157586944/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157586867/historyI think only first object should match the whole launch centre, the second being only a fenc... |
| 2 | 2021-03-12 04:49 | katpatuka ♦194 | Ok... The smaller area will have a name too but we don't know it ;) btw: you could have it fixed too ;) | |
| 84411899 by cbeddow @ 2020-04-30 12:07 | 1 | 2021-03-11 20:40 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, you create a node for Sohae Satellite Launching Station which is already mapped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174778130 (two known names for a single place). Consequently there is a dupplicate. Do you mind if you or I delete this node? |
| 2 | 2021-03-11 23:49 | cbeddow ♦26 | Yes that is reasonable! Thanks for catching that duplicate | |
| 94934721 by michel60 @ 2020-11-28 09:10 | 1 | 2021-01-01 14:52 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour, merci beaucoup d'avoir rajouté les adresses sur Chantilly, cela manquait cruellement. Cependant je vois quelques incohérences entre les noms de rues créées et le cadastre dans cette zone. Typiquement l'allée du Castel serait un peu plus au sud, i... |
| 2 | 2021-01-02 17:02 | michel60 ♦61 | Bonjour,J'ai fait de mon mieux et il y a des incohérence entre le cadastre et les panneaux des noms des rue.Mes mises a jour sont plutôt basées sur les panneaux des noms des rues.J'ai eu beaucoup de mal ...Dès qu'il fera plus chaud, j'irai voir ... | |
| 3 | 2021-01-03 21:24 | LeTopographeFou | Pas de soucis, je ne sais pas si j'aurai l'occasion de passer par là prochainement mais si c'est le cas j'essaierai aussi d'y jeter un œil. Oui le cadastre n'a pas toujours raison, d'où ma question. D'ici là je mets une note pour si ... | |
| 4 | 2021-01-03 21:27 | LeTopographeFou | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2484291 | |
| 71228211 by EZRouting @ 2019-06-13 18:11 | 1 | 2020-10-30 13:39 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, according to OSM rules street names shall not abbreviate their type (Ln, Dr, Sq, Rd...) but have full type names (Lane, Drive, Square, Road...). If I'm not wrong I can see here that you used abbreviations on several streets you created/modified. Since you requested a review, can you please ... |
| 2 | 2020-11-21 14:06 | LeTopographeFou | Fixed in changeset 94545977 | |
| 62918606 by sclamons @ 2018-09-25 16:05 | 1 | 2020-10-30 13:28 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, according to OSM rules street names shall not abbreviate type of street (Ln, Dr, Sq...). They have to be full names (Lane, Drive, Square...). I fixed some street names in Creekside Village but please be carefull if you have to create new streets. |
| 75729267 by Imago_Mundi @ 2019-10-15 14:46 | 1 | 2020-10-11 13:57 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, regarding equestrian shop I suggest to change it to in used shop=equestrian. What do you think? I propose to make the change. |
| 74282584 by Rokeby @ 2019-09-09 22:02 | 1 | 2020-10-11 13:56 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, regarding equestrian shop on node 6783874175 I suggest to change it to in used shop=equestrian. What do you think? I propose to make the change. |
| 88525166 by LeTopographeFou @ 2020-07-26 15:55 | 1 | 2020-07-27 07:37 | LeTopographeFou | Sorry for the large span changeset, I've selected only one part of the features to upload in JOSM but must have selected the menu button which upload ALL the features. |
| 69160478 by bagage @ 2019-04-12 19:05 | 1 | 2020-07-25 13:56 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour, l'Église Adventiste du Septième Jour n'est pas catholique mais adventiste comme son nom l'indique. J'ai corrigé. |
| 2 | 2020-07-25 13:59 | LeTopographeFou | Rebonjour, un presbytère n'étant pas un lieu de culte je remplace amenity=place_of_worship par office=religion. | |
| 85705380 by vincent_95 @ 2020-05-25 06:50 | 1 | 2020-05-28 13:03 | LeTopographeFou | (Re)bonjour,En rédigeant ma réponse au changeset sur le Picard mes yeux sont attirés sur cet autre doublon et en l’occurrence je ne pense pas me tromper en disant que cette fois-ci je t'ai doublé de deux jours sur le terrain ! Nos modifs ont dû se crois... |
| 2 | 2020-05-29 13:19 | vincent_95 ♦34 | Oui bien vu, c'est typiquement ça. Je ne mets à jour mes données maps.me qu'une fois tous les quelques jours, et j'avoue ne pas vérifier quand j'ajoute un commerce si je ne le vois pas dans maps.me... bingo ici :)corrigé par https://www.openst... | |
| 3 | 2020-06-13 08:38 | LeTopographeFou | Merci ! | |
| 83572191 by CES16 @ 2020-04-15 07:24 | 1 | 2020-06-04 20:00 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour, dans ce changeset vous avez indiqué que toute la zone est un bâtiment (building=office). Or cela ne semble pas être le cas. Ne serait-ce pas plutôt office=company au lieu de building=office ? |
| 85539902 by vincent_95 @ 2020-05-21 08:16 | 1 | 2020-05-23 08:04 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour Vincent, le magasin Picard était déjà présent, ajouté par mes soins et je pense bien cartographié (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687450405). Peux-tu stp corriger le doublon ? |
| 2 | 2020-05-24 16:31 | vincent_95 ♦34 | Oops merci. Je regarde ça dès que j'ai un JOSM sous la main | |
| 3 | 2020-05-25 17:33 | vincent_95 ♦34 | Bonjour,j'ai finalement pu regarder.Contrairement à ce que tu dis, le magasin Picard n'a pas été ajouté par tes soins en 2019. Je l'ai ajouté en 2014, il a été édité au fil du temps, puis supprimé/remplac&eacu... | |
| 4 | 2020-05-28 12:55 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour Vincent,En effet, merci pour ta clarification sur l'historique, il s'en est passé des choses depuis. Cette modification (également présente sur le Mcdo voisin) avait pour objectif d'améliorer l'existant et est inspirée de ce qui se fai... | |
| 5 | 2020-05-29 13:45 | vincent_95 ♦34 | Merci pour ton retour.Je comprends les arguments aussi bien pour micro-mapper que pour avoir une emprise globale. De mon côté je préfère investir sur d'autres infos pratiques, notamment les moyens de contact et les horaires. Tout ça doit pouvoir se combiner, ... | |
| 84626066 by LeTopographeFou @ 2020-05-04 13:12 | 1 | 2020-05-04 20:52 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello. Thank you for your additions to the map. In the future, could you make your changesets smaller? This changeset covers two continents and much of the North Atlantic. Cheers :) |
| 2 | 2020-05-05 12:28 | LeTopographeFou | Hi chachafish, yes sorry, it's not something I'm used to do. I discovered that suddenly (or after something I made wrong?) my JOSM changesets where not automatically closed and that they where merged. I think now it should be ok. Strange because I never use the "ammend last changeset&... | |
| 3 | 2020-05-05 14:08 | chachafish ♦462 | Thank you :) | |
| 68352211 by vincent_95 @ 2019-03-20 20:23 | 1 | 2020-05-04 11:38 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour Vincent,Dans ce changeset (de 2019) tu as créé un labo que tu avais déjà ajouté en 2011. Malheureusement surement parce qu'il n'y a pas de consensus sur la carto des labos et que tous les rendus ne gèrent pas toutes les variantes... Je ... |
| 2 | 2020-05-04 11:42 | vincent_95 ♦34 | Ah oui bien vu. Merci pour ta vigilance, ok bien sûr | |
| 3 | 2020-05-05 12:24 | LeTopographeFou | Fait dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84694981, merci. | |
| 73689504 by Christine_E @ 2019-08-24 06:33 | 1 | 2020-04-28 22:31 | LeTopographeFou | Hi Christine_E, you tagged several buildings on Conant Street putting the house number into the name tag. They should go in 'addr:housenumber' and not in 'name'. I fixed them in changeset 84294139 . Thank you for checking your other changesets in case you made the same mistake. |
| 84195481 by LeTopographeFou @ 2020-04-27 11:24 | 1 | 2020-04-27 16:27 | Supaplex ♦10,446 | Not here, it is in Hsinchu Science Park. The location which is in Wikidata is wrong. |
| 2 | 2020-04-27 18:47 | LeTopographeFou | [see Changeset #84212656]Thanks a lot Supaplex for moving the node and not deleted it! | |
| 77152971 by cmitchell @ 2019-11-16 01:25 | 1 | 2020-04-19 21:12 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, you replaced aeroway=launchpad with aeroway=spaceport wich I disagree. According to wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway=spaceport) and to common language Wallops is the spaceport, which contains multiple launchpads like Pad 0A. The same way a runway is not an airport and a pier... |
| 2 | 2020-06-22 18:56 | cmitchell ♦4 | sure feel free to revert it | |
| 54834469 by aero901 @ 2017-12-22 07:48 | 1 | 2020-02-12 21:00 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, you put conditional oneway tags on 5 cycleways but with a wrong schema: The key shall be "oneway:conditional" (and not "oneway") and the value "forward @ Mo,We,Fr,Su;backward @ Tu,Th,Sa" (and not "conditional=forward @ Mo,We,Fr,Su;backward @ Tu,Th,Sa"). Ca... |
| 2 | 2020-02-18 16:51 | LeTopographeFou | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81181042 | |
| 55846796 by としょいいん @ 2018-01-29 02:41 | 1 | 2020-02-12 21:07 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, you put conditional oneway tags on twp roads but with a wrong schema: The key shall be "oneway:conditional" (and not "oneway") and the value "yes @(Mo-Su 21:00-04:00)" (and not "conditional=yes @(Mo-Su 21:00-04:00)"). Can you please fix it? If you are not ... |
| 2 | 2020-02-18 15:38 | LeTopographeFou | I've seen you fixed it, thanks. | |
| 68973865 by hs4407 @ 2019-04-07 11:40 | 1 | 2020-02-12 21:04 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, you put conditional oneway tags on residential roads along the river but with a wrong schema: The key shall be "oneway:conditional" (and not "oneway") and the value "yes @ (Mo-Fr 07:00-08:40)" (and not "conditional=yes @ (Mo-Fr 07:00-08:40)"). Can you plea... |
| 2 | 2020-02-12 22:18 | hs4407 ♦2 | Good morning LeTopographeFouI changed it.Thank you for pointing out. | |
| 3 | 2020-02-13 20:02 | LeTopographeFou | Thanks! | |
| 62324399 by moon_walker @ 2018-09-05 20:49 | 1 | 2019-12-16 21:28 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, you put maxheight=w on three of those highways. I don't understand what it means. Can you please explain or fix? |
| 2 | 2019-12-17 18:05 | FlyTy ♦15 | Hello, moon_walker is no longer on the team so I’ll respond for them in this case. Thank you for pointing out the maxheight tag. It appears a prior editor created the tag (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47554080) and moon_walker copied it. However, it appears to be a mistake and I re... | |
| 3 | 2019-12-17 18:31 | LeTopographeFou | Thank you for taking care of moon_walker changesets, your quick answer and the fix ! | |
| 72554372 by rkkarnee @ 2019-07-23 12:02 | 1 | 2019-12-16 21:27 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, you put maxheight=w on one of this highway. I don't understand what it means. Can you please explain or fix? |
| 2 | 2019-12-17 05:00 | rkkarnee ♦8 | Hi,Apologies for the edit, this has occurred while I used the shortcut to have the data turned off. Will ensure to review my edits before saving them.I've corrected the error under changeset # 78504844Regards,rkkarnee | |
| 3 | 2019-12-17 07:16 | LeTopographeFou | Thanks for your quick answer and fix! | |
| 20993464 by Ptigrouick @ 2014-03-08 19:55 | 1 | 2019-12-16 21:45 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour, vous avez mis maxweight=12000 ce qui veut dire 12000 tonnes (12000000 kg!) sur 4 portions de la Route de Montferrier. Je pense que vous vouliez dire 'maxweight=12' (ou éventuellement 'maxweight=12 t'). Pouvez-vous corriger svp ? |
| 37715487 by Haisuli @ 2016-03-09 18:26 | 1 | 2019-12-16 21:37 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, you put maxweight=40000 which means 40000 tons (40000000 kg!) on four ways here. I think you wanted to say 'maxweight=40000 lbs'. Can you please fix? |
| 45754366 by JuanVerde @ 2017-02-02 17:40 | 1 | 2019-12-16 21:30 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, you put maxheight=w on one of this highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166721064). I don't understand what it means. Can you please explain or fix? |
| 62305551 by dendik @ 2018-09-05 09:45 | 1 | 2019-12-16 21:16 | LeTopographeFou | Hi dendik, you put a tag "maxheight=250 kg" on cable car https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/623051699 . Did you mean 'maxweight' and not 'maxheight'? Can you please fix? |
| 2 | 2019-12-17 08:39 | dendik ♦5 | You're right, it's maxweight. Looks like you already fixed it. Thank you! | |
| 49515881 by LOCO-DH @ 2017-06-14 01:42 | 1 | 2019-12-16 21:04 | LeTopographeFou | Ola, ustedes has puesto una etiqueta 'maxheight=500m' sobre el element https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500293066 . No entiendo ese etiqueta en un puente para peatones. 500 metros, es enorme ! Ustedes puede corregir/suprimir la etiqueta por favor ? |
| 75244217 by Irwan Djoehana (Retail Shake) @ 2019-10-03 16:29 | 1 | 2019-10-13 20:51 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour,Vous avez ajouté les tags de marques (brand) ce qui est bien mais ce faisant vous avez supprimé le nom exact du magasin : Leroy Merlin Paris la Madeleine. Pouvez-vous svp justifier ce changement ? Leroy Merlin est la marque, pas nécessairement le nom du magasin. Je m... |
| 2 | 2019-10-14 08:09 | Irwan Djoehana (Retail Shake) ♦1 | Bonjour, oui, l'attribut "name" est souvent mal utilisé. Je me réfère au Wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shops"Avoid place annotations in name: Some organisations with multiple outlets refer to an individual one using place annotations (f.e. a we... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-14 08:11 | Irwan Djoehana (Retail Shake) ♦1 | name=* is intended to hold the name as displayed on the shop. This is usually the biggest logo or text you can find on a shop. It's what people call the shop when referring to it. Sometimes this overlaps with the operator tag. | |
| 61458491 by LeTopographeFou @ 2018-08-08 08:08 | 1 | 2019-02-22 13:00 | tuxayo ♦273 | Bonjour, à propos du glacier "Maison Marcel" j'ai remplacé "natural=glacier" par "amenity=ice_cream"Sauf erreur d'intéprétation de ma part, ça devrait être le bon attribut |
| 2 | 2019-02-26 14:17 | LeTopographeFou | Oui, merci ! Sûrement un conflit de traduction dans l'appli que je vais essayer de faire remonter | |
| 3 | 2019-06-19 10:36 | tuxayo ♦273 | > Sûrement un conflit de traduction dans l'appli que je vais essayer de faire remonterMerci! :DIl semble que c'est ici que ça se passe mais je n'arrive pas à trouve "ice_cream"https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/osmand/#search | |
| 4 | 2019-06-19 10:38 | tuxayo ♦273 | Bonjour, le nom du studio est vraiment"Europe 1;RTL 2;RFM;Fun Radio" ?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5817421528 | |
| 5 | 2019-06-19 19:43 | LeTopographeFou | Concernant le problème de traduction : Glacier (en montagne) => https://hosted.weblate.org/translate/osmand/phrases/fr/?checksum=6f81e89ef0134d1dGlacier (vendeur de glaces) => https://hosted.weblate.org/translate/osmand/phrases/fr/?checksum=f422dc42445454a7Je viens de change... | |
| 6 | 2019-06-19 20:36 | LeTopographeFou | Pour les radios, 4 POI distincts seraient probablement plus appropriés : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71416017 | |
| 68169859 by oc-OpenStreetMap @ 2019-03-15 10:43 | 1 | 2019-05-29 21:49 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour,Cette route a name=Route des Estrets et name:fr=Route des Gorges. Pouvez-vous svp clarifier quel est le nom français de cette route ? Je suppose qu'il faut supprimer name:fr=Route des Gorges mais n'ai pas cherché plus loin. |
| 2 | 2019-05-30 14:13 | LeTopographeFou | Réponse de oc-OpenStreetMap en privé :Bonjour,Le nom officiel (name) est composé d’un mot français et d’un mot occitan : Route des Estrets (avec une erreur d’orthographe)Le nom français (name:fr) est : Route des Gorges Le nom occitan (na... | |
| 3 | 2019-05-30 14:14 | LeTopographeFou | Bien noté mais pour moi name:fr n'est pas la traduction française du nom officiel mais le nom officiel français quand le français n'est pas la langue officielle du lieu (nuance). Par exemple le but à l'étranger n'est pas de traduire les n... | |
| 65673369 by Mapsomator @ 2018-12-21 16:17 | 1 | 2019-05-13 20:56 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour, j'ai l'impression que la rue Aristide Maillol a été marqué en sens unique alors qu'elle ne le serait que sur la moitié (cf. photos aérienne). Est-ce vraiment en sens unique sur toute la longueur ? |
| 65676265 by Mapsomator @ 2018-12-21 18:13 | 1 | 2019-05-13 20:34 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour, vous avez récemment cartographié la boutique Jean Delatour comme en construction mais avez aussi renseigné des moyens de paiements, un horaire d'ouverture... Le bâtiment est-il en travaux ou ouvert ? Par avance merci pour le correctif |
| 2 | 2019-05-14 16:20 | Mapsomator ♦1 | Non, je vous prie de m'excuser. Il n'est pas en travaux ouvert, je me suis trompé. Cependant les autres renseignements sont toujours valides. Normalement, j'ai déjà corrigé avant que vous lisiez ce message. | |
| 23055447 by Extramiler @ 2014-06-21 04:19 | 1 | 2019-01-27 13:57 | LeTopographeFou | Hi Extramiler, I can see that you added the street number in the "name" tag instead of the "addr:housenumber" tag for a lot of buildings. Am I wrong? I suggest to move them in addr:housenumber. What do you think? |
| 2 | 2019-02-13 10:13 | LeTopographeFou | Extramiler, I've started fixing several of your changesets in this area.Also please note that we don't put abbreviations in street names (PL => Place, LN => Lane...) | |
| 64079550 by LeTopographeFou @ 2018-11-01 13:48 | 1 | 2018-11-19 05:24 | booktiger ♦56 | 您好，landuse=retail(商店区)标签仅用于标注商业区，请不要把整个开发区使用该标签标注。Hello, The "landuse=retail" tag is only used to mark the business district. Please do not use the label for the entire Economic and Technological Development Area.Read ... |
| 2 | 2018-11-19 20:22 | LeTopographeFou | Oops, sorry, I agree I picked the wrong one (I know retail is for a shopping area, which is not true here, I must have been fooled by a false friend between French and English). Anyway, do you think landuse=commercial would better fit? Looking at the WIki I think so but am not familiar with this pla... | |
| 3 | 2018-12-10 02:25 | booktiger ♦56 | I discussed it with other Chinese editors. The landuse = commercial tag does not seem to be accurate. Because the Economic and Technological Development Area is like building a new city. Includes homes, shops and factories. So I am not quite sure how to mark it up... | |
| 4 | 2018-12-10 18:49 | LeTopographeFou | Ok, then maybe take a look at place=suburb or place=quarter? | |
| 5 | 2018-12-10 18:49 | LeTopographeFou | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place | |
| 6 | 2018-12-29 16:51 | LeTopographeFou | I've replaced landuse=retail with place=suburb | |
| 52756498 by fscio @ 2017-10-09 11:22 | 1 | 2018-11-19 20:28 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, I found 27 buildings (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/roof%3Ashape=gabledHilton%20Burton%20St%20Georges%20Park) which has a strange roof:type value. They all seems to be of your creation. Can you please have a look and fix them? |
| 2 | 2018-11-19 21:03 | LeTopographeFou | Idem for https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/roof%3Ashape=gabledmcas%20kaneohe%20bay and https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/roof%3Ashape=gabledYA7FG-JZHRC-FJ9LV | |
| 3 | 2018-11-19 21:06 | LeTopographeFou | Note: I suggest you to use JOSM to help fixing easily those objects (there is a JOSM export button on taginfo pages). If you want to replace with roof:shape=gabled and require more step-by-step details feel free to ask | |
| 4 | 2018-12-29 16:43 | LeTopographeFou | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65869739 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65869716 | |
| 65250813 by crln1 @ 2018-12-06 20:24 | 1 | 2018-12-06 21:42 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour, A ce que je vois tu supprimes pas mal de bâtiments dans ce changeset et quelques autres avant alors qu'ils existent bel et bien... Ce qui est une régression. Peux-tu stp expliquer la raison ? |
| 62064741 by MANOSEI @ 2018-08-28 09:39 | 1 | 2018-11-17 10:06 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour, bonne idée que d'indiquer les amphithéâtres. Le wiki suggère (faute d'un schéma approuvé) d'utiliser les combinaisons amenity=theatre et theatre:type=amphi (615 usages à ce jour). Avez-vous suffisamment de connaissance des lieux... |
| 62064893 by MANOSEI @ 2018-08-28 09:46 | 1 | 2018-11-17 10:01 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour,Il y a une voie qui contient juste name="à pied" dans ce changeset. L'intention est-elle d'indiquer un itinéraire piéton pour circuler dans l'école militaire ? Si oui, il serait mieux de retirer name et de mettre highway=footway ainsi ... |
| 59500225 by 6ril95110 @ 2018-06-03 06:54 | 1 | 2018-10-09 20:22 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour, je trouve plusieurs passages piétons dans vos modifications qui ne sont pas connectés aux rues qu'ils croisent. Quand deux routes se croisent il convient de leur faire partager un noeud au niveau de cette intersection. Dans le cas d'un passage piéton il s'... |
| 62725663 by simon_geovelo @ 2018-09-19 10:55 | 1 | 2018-09-25 11:41 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour Simon, tu as retiré le tag highway=unclassified de la way 232204758, du coup ce n'est plus une route empruntable pour les voitures alors qu'elle l'est. Erreur à réparer ? |
| 2 | 2018-09-25 11:57 | simon_geovelo ♦88 | Merci pour le signalement, c'est corrigé.J'ai supprimé la mauvaise ligne highway=unclassified au lieu de cycleway=track. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-25 12:42 | LeTopographeFou | Super merci ! | |
| 57156097 by LeTopographeFou @ 2018-03-13 19:42 | 1 | 2018-06-21 21:30 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 | Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569433118 is a spaceport? From reading WIkipedia article it seems that it was planned at some time in past but it is not clear whetever this plans resulted in anything.Also - what you think about adding landuse=commercial, given that it operate... |
| 2 | 2018-06-26 09:50 | LeTopographeFou | Hi Mateusz, considering the existing installations and the official website (https://www.andoyaspace.no/sounding-rockets-balloons/), I consider this no more a project. I don't know in which language you read Wikipedia, but it might not be up-to-date?Reguarding your proposal I think it makes... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-26 09:53 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,660 | I looked at English language wikipedia. Maybe it is outdated? | |
| 57148034 by Míša Karapetjanová @ 2018-03-13 14:57 | 1 | 2018-05-27 15:58 | LeTopographeFou | Hi,Node 5475841622 looks like an advertising, which is not allowed in OSM. Can you please explain why you created it?Moreover languages are not respected in both features: 'name:pt' shall contains Portuguese, not another language. And 'name' should preferably be the commo... |
| 57057243 by tychoanomaly @ 2018-03-10 12:45 | 1 | 2018-03-10 22:08 | LeTopographeFou | Hi tychoanomaly and welcome onboard OSM!You changed the landing zone 1 and 2 from landingpad to runway. What is the rationale? Those features are not runways and the aeroway=landingpad tag had been approved for this kind of feature (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dspaceport... |
| 2 | 2018-03-10 22:52 | tychoanomaly ♦1 | Hi LeTopographeFou,My rationale was so that if set to runway then they are visible in the standard map layer. If they're set to 'aeroway' they're invisible. I don't really understand the point in having an invisible map feature!A runway is a patch of ground prepared ... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-11 14:11 | LeTopographeFou | Ok, then you are ignoring two things.First we shall not map for the renderer. OSM is there to build a database, not to display maps (even if I would like it to change). The map displayed in the website is a thirdparty among many others which can easily be modified in order to render launchpads, ... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-11 14:17 | LeTopographeFou | I opened a request to render aeroway=landingpad: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3112 | |
| 5 | 2024-03-24 13:03 | ti-lo ♦84 | After "only" 6 years it's considered a "new feature" https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4917#issuecomment-1870608555 | |
| 52305855 by km2bp @ 2017-09-23 14:45 | 1 | 2017-10-25 10:03 | LeTopographeFou | Hi km2bp, I was recently in St Peter's basilica (Vatican) and where not able to localize the amenities you've mapped there (drinking point, post box...). Do you remind at which level they were ? Assuming level=0 is the basilica, -1 the pope's tombs and -2 the necropole |
| 2 | 2017-11-17 14:24 | km2bp ♦285 | This is located on the roof. You can go there while visiting the Vatican museum https://youtu.be/-mIMaM8iB1c?t=6m59s | |
| 3 | 2017-11-20 20:28 | LeTopographeFou | Ok, thank you! I've seen you put layer=3 but I replaced to level=3 which is more suitable to indicate floor levels (whereas layer is only for rendering purposes) | |
| 48876694 by Tr4sK @ 2017-05-22 06:04 | 1 | 2017-08-26 08:14 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour, la rue des Barres et la rue du Grenier sur l'Eau sont pavées et non pas goudronnées. Est-ce donc volontairement qu'elles aient été marquées comme goudronnées ? J'ai fait la correction mais j'ignore du coup si les autres rues sont... |
| 2 | 2017-08-26 09:16 | Tr4sK ♦5 | Merci pour la correction. Il m’arrive d’avoir le clique rapide. | |
| 47952755 by althio @ 2017-04-19 21:24 | 1 | 2017-07-07 18:45 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour, je vois que les passages piétons et chemins piétons ont été indiqués comme rue piétonnes (highway=pedestrian). Je trouve personnellement highway=footway plus approprié, le wiki tendant à confirmer cela. Je ne parle pas des terres plein... |
| 2 | 2017-07-11 08:20 | althio ♦45 | J'ai déjà eu une discussion à ce sujet (en privé) avec un autre contributeur. On peut discuter ici sur un changeset, mais aussi basculer sur le forum si cela t'intéresse. http://forum.openstreetmap.fr/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=5614 Voici ma lectu... | |
| 42881021 by emem @ 2016-10-13 20:24 | 1 | 2017-03-11 00:37 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, you used access=permissive but according to the wiki access=private would better fit as soon as the airport is not open to general traffic. What do you think? |
| 2 | 2017-03-20 10:12 | LeTopographeFou | Modified to access=private in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47007664 | |
| 20621797 by Jepau @ 2014-02-17 19:09 | 1 | 2017-02-12 12:04 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour, je comprend que l'emprunte soit bien des immeubles (d'où le correctif), mais les immeubles sont-ils complétement des boutiques ? Tous les étages ? Il me parait plus juste de conserver les bâtiments actuels (mais remplacer building=retail par building=yes... |
| 2 | 2017-02-12 18:16 | Jepau ♦3 | Bonsoir, votre proposition fait sens. Je m'étais simplement attaché a faire réapparaître les bâtiments qui avaient disparu de la carte. Vous avez très probablement raison sur le fait que les commerces sont au rdc et non pas sur la hauteurs des immeubles. ... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-12 21:54 | LeTopographeFou | Ok merci, cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46031362 | |
| 44244894 by LeTopographeFou @ 2016-12-07 21:04 | 1 | 2016-12-20 00:16 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hello, You've merged together various "estate_agents", "estate_agency" etc. in here. I can see the logic in this, except that you've ignored the main tag of "shop" or "office" and made them all "office". I've certainly used both &q... |
| 2 | 2017-02-06 23:37 | LeTopographeFou | Hi SomeoneElse,Yes I see your point and I've followed a little bit the comments about shop vs office for this kind of business. What do you propose? I'm afraid that I will not be able to make the difference between those two as I'm not from England and can't check by myself. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-07 00:17 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | > What do you propose?I'd change the ones that were shop previously (like http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351521115/history ) back to shop, and if any of them had other tags that were changed into "office" at the same time, I'd change those back too. | |
| 4 | 2017-02-10 18:41 | LeTopographeFou | Done, all previously tagged shops have been redefined as shop. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45980978 | |
| 45869506 by LeTopographeFou @ 2017-02-06 22:55 | 1 | 2017-02-06 23:30 | LeTopographeFou | See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23004_-_TyposThinking afterwards, this edit may have been too agressive... I hope it will not be perceived this way. |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 21:00 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | I wouldn't say "aggressive", but I would say "irrelevant" - anything that parses mph speed limits is going to parse "30mph".Also, this change is making the tidying up of some earlier problem edits much, much harder. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-09 23:21 | LeTopographeFou | Yes I agree with your second sentence to better answer your first point: "30 mph" is different from "30mph" exactly because parsing (and regular expressions) can't save everyone, everywhere and everytime. This is why this is relevant at the end. Having a consistent data set ... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-12 14:15 | SK53 ♦864 | The idea that by editing tags to some kind of common format will somehow make it easier for data consumers is a pernicious fallacy. Any use of a speed limit with or without "mph" in the tag will require some form of parsing, error detection and data wrangling. For instance the 11th com... | |
| 45958705 by LeTopographeFou @ 2017-02-09 21:59 | 1 | 2017-02-09 22:08 | LeTopographeFou | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23006_-_Choose_of_a_wrong_tag |
| 44033095 by Meersbrook @ 2016-11-29 12:21 | 1 | 2017-02-08 19:47 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, way 456578120 has no tag. Can you please fix this issue? |
| 2 | 2017-02-08 19:53 | Meersbrook ♦29 | I used the polygon to create a shape. Some of the vertices have assigned roles. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-09 12:23 | LeTopographeFou | Ok but then the "shape" shall have tags, otherwise it means nothing. I assume you draw it from an existing real feature, so I'm sure there is a way to tag it, even with a note or fixme only. I don't want to delete it but I know there are bots/people which may delete it, so the be... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-09 12:57 | Meersbrook ♦29 | You can delete it, it's nothing that can't be redrawn if necessary. | |
| 42808712 by davbra98 @ 2016-10-11 17:41 | 1 | 2017-02-08 00:03 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, actually you put maxspeed="source:maxspeed=DE:zone30" instead of source:maxspeed="DE:zone30". Can you please fix the issue? |
| 2 | 2017-02-08 00:04 | LeTopographeFou | Moreover I wonder if maxspeed="DE:zone30" should not be the right tag to put instead of source:maxspeed | |
| 45474443 by Artus92 @ 2017-01-25 12:50 | 1 | 2017-02-07 23:18 | LeTopographeFou | Hi Artus92 and welcome to OSM!It looks like you've created two empty areas (468728257 and 468728256). I assume this is an error. Can you please explain the purpose? I can delete them for you if you are not yet confident with the tools. |
| 44244656 by LeTopographeFou @ 2016-12-07 20:53 | 1 | 2016-12-08 13:04 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | What were the usage statistics on "shop=candle" and "shop=candles" before you changed e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4401825186/history ? |
| 2 | 2016-12-08 13:10 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | You might also want to double-check the spelling of the "Yankie" in here too, or check with the original mapper. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-08 19:39 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, since only "candles" is documented on the wiki and was mostly used, I pick this one to consolidate the use of this type of shop. A bit of math: there was 37 shop=candle vs 102 shop=candles. Reguarding "Yankie" I decided to focus this type of mass edit to the bare minimum, i.e... | |
| 4 | 2016-12-09 17:39 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Thanks for that. I'll have to add "candles" to https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua . | |
| 43414496 by Claumires @ 2016-11-05 04:34 | 1 | 2016-11-05 09:38 | LeTopographeFou | Hi @Claumires, is it normal that this changeset has deleted lot of ways and buildings I've drawn in this area ? I don't see any interest to remove them. |
| 186743 by PerroVerd @ 2008-08-11 14:35 | 1 | 2016-10-02 21:50 | LeTopographeFou | Hi,Most (if not all) of those gas stations have opening_hours=Sa-Su 24/7 which means that:1. the gas stations is opened only on Saturday and Sunday (which looks strange nowadays)2. There is a conflict because "24/7" means that it is open 24 hours a day 7 days a week (and not only o... |
| 38932583 by ADJOGBLE Emmanuel @ 2016-04-27 20:03 | 1 | 2016-10-02 10:20 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour,Concernant les lampadaires, il y a deux soucis :1. Mauvais formatage des horaires, il faut mettre 18:00-05:30 pour que tous les outils puissent reconnaitre cette valeur2. Mauvais tag, il faut utiliser lit au lieu de opening_hoursCe qui donne donc lit=18:00-05:30.Pouvez-vous s... |
| 38933151 by ADJOGBLE Emmanuel @ 2016-04-27 20:19 | 1 | 2016-10-02 10:19 | LeTopographeFou | Bonjour,Concernant les lampadaires, il y a deux soucis :1. Mauvais formatage des horaires, il faut mettre 18:00-05:30 pour que tous les outils puissent reconnaitre cette valeur2. Mauvais tag, il faut utiliser lit au lieu de opening_hoursCe qui donne donc lit=18:00-05:30.Pouvez-vous s... |
| 34479372 by LeTopographeFou @ 2015-10-06 21:20 | 1 | 2015-10-06 22:35 | aseerel4c26 ♦294 | Hi LeTopographeFou, could you please comment on the relation of your changeset with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ? |
| 2 | 2015-10-07 09:21 | gormo ♦159 | ...especially on "Document and discuss your plans". Where is the documentation? Was there a discussion? | |
| 3 | 2015-10-07 23:52 | aseerel4c26 ♦294 | umm, there are much more similar changesets by LeTopographeFou. Where is the discussion for those changes? | |
| 4 | 2015-10-07 23:53 | aseerel4c26 ♦294 | ... I've wrote a notification mail. | |
| 5 | 2015-10-07 23:54 | aseerel4c26 ♦294 | ... and the DWG is aware too | |
| 6 | 2015-10-08 22:58 | LeTopographeFou | Thanks for your care aseerel4c26. Because the type=broad_leaved has been declared as deprecated on the Wiki, on TagInfo, and in JOSM (where I've had more than once warnings on this fact), I did not feel the need to open any discussion with the community neither to create any page to document a ... | |
| 7 | 2016-07-30 22:13 | fkv ♦585 | The automated edits code of conduct does not depend on whether a tag is "deprecated". So-called deprecated tags are not necessarily wrong. First of all, many deprecations are done by single users who edit the wiki without prior discussion. Even if a formal proposal has been accepted by vot... | |
| 8 | 2016-08-01 17:31 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | @fkv When I looked at the changes in here back in October last year I didn't see any evidence of data loss (though I only looked at a sample of the 5341 nodes). Whilst a change like type=broad_leafed => leaf_type=broadleaved should have been discussed beforehand, in case someone was aware... | |
| 9 | 2016-08-01 18:43 | fkv ♦585 | Just take the first few nodes in this changeset as examples. They are located on Plaza de la Ciudad de la Habana, where there are palms and other trees. The non-palms were changed from type=broad_leafed (old spelling variant, but that's another issue) to leaf_type=broadleaved, losing the inform... | |
| 10 | 2016-08-01 19:23 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, this changeset was made a long time ago and I thought it has been reverted (with some others of the same type and of the same period). I'm going to ask for a revert by mail if it is still feasible. | |
| 11 | 2016-08-01 20:39 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | @fkv thanks; I wasn't aware of the use of "type" as meaning "not a palm tree".@LeTopographeFou thanks; I've got the message requesting a revert. Before doing it I'll ask around to see if there's any better way to indicate "not a palm tree". As ... | |
| 12 | 2016-08-02 00:16 | fkv ♦585 | I was asking for a revert, but it might be better to restore the type=* tags while keeping the leaf_type=* tags. It does not hurt to have both.You could use taxon=* to mark palms, but there is no single taxon that includes all non-palm broad-leaved trees. Eudicots would be missing magnoliids, Aust... | |
| 13 | 2016-08-02 11:56 | SK53 ♦864 | I tend to agree with @fkv on all issues: 1) large scale updates often have unpredictable side effects; 2) originally we distinguished between conifers/dicots aka broad-leaved and palms (and possibly one or two others) using a range of tags wood/type etc. Ultimately these have been replaced by leaf_t... | |
| 14 | 2016-08-02 14:24 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | OK, done: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41192016 . | |
| 15 | 2016-08-03 18:32 | LeTopographeFou | @SomeoneElse: Thank you! | |
| 35653117 by LeTopographeFou @ 2015-11-29 19:15 | 1 | 2015-11-30 19:53 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | HiAre you sure that when you surveyed http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2030692588/history it was a speed limit sign? A truvello is normally a speed camera, but you would have noticed that along with the only 80kph speed limit sign in the UK?I am sure this was a mistake, because making an undisc... |
| 2 | 2015-11-30 20:01 | chillly ♦819 | This is an undiscussed mass edit.Please revert it now. | |
| 3 | 2015-11-30 22:09 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | This changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35675358 .LeTopographeFou, please do not make further mass edits like this. As you have found out from the comments that other mappers have made on your most recent changes, it's very easy for you to misunderstand ... | |
| 4 | 2015-12-03 22:13 | LeTopographeFou | Hi, Thank you for the revert SomeoneElse. No excuse for my defense, I have bitten off more than I can chew whithout understanding that by fixing tags I was introducing errors in some of them.Reguarding the node Trigpoint pointed out, after an OSM/Bing/Google Maps survey it appears that this node i... | |
| 5 | 2015-12-03 22:52 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Of course; we can't use Bing Maps or Google Maps for copyright reasons :)However, in this case I can confirm that the speed limit on the A45 (at least the other side of Ryton on Dunsmore a couple of years ago) was indeed 50 mph. However maxspeed=80 (in km/h) is of course the same as "ma... | |
| 34414132 by LeTopographeFou @ 2015-10-03 19:25 | 1 | 2015-10-21 12:28 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | What role should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239796445 have within https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1074897 ? Is it an inner, or something else entirely? |
| 2 | 2015-10-27 12:40 | LeTopographeFou | Don't know, This changeset is only about replacing deprecated properties. This relation already existed before. You should ask directly in the page of this way/relation. | |
| 34428457 by LeTopographeFou @ 2015-10-04 14:08 | 1 | 2015-10-05 17:21 | didier2020 ♦91 | c'est plutot UnQuality Assurance on trees :nodes with tag leaf_type=broadleavedcomme celui-la : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2640855577 |
| 2 | 2015-10-07 21:00 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | @LeTopographeFou - are you going to correct the errors that you've introduced in this changeset (as identified by didier2020 ) or do you need help doing so? Please also do reply to the changeset discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34479372 .Best Regards,Andy Townsend (Som... | |
| 3 | 2015-10-08 23:24 | LeTopographeFou | I don't understand what didier2020 expects from me and where I have introduced any error. I only understand that I should have commented better m'y changeset. | |
| 4 | 2015-10-09 11:38 | didier2020 ♦91 | en regardant l'historique ce node:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2640855577/historyon voit que tag leaft_type=boradleveled a été ajouté dans ce changeset, alors que seul le way aurait du être modifié. | |
| 5 | 2015-10-27 12:37 | LeTopographeFou | Ok, thank you for the fix |