chillly participated in the following changeset discussionschillly participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 143521590 by Paul Berry @ 2023-11-02 10:14 | 1 | 2023-12-12 15:41 | chillly | I have just seen this edit changing the addresses in the village I live in to North Ferriby. This is a mistake. I live in Swanland, not a suburb of North Ferriby. The 'Postal Town' is a disused remnant of the PAF from Royal Mail. The PAF is COPYRIGHT material that we cannot use. It is the ... |
| 2 | 2023-12-12 20:25 | Paul Berry ♦124 | I used the data given on https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/HU.html and the advice on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom as a guide. I can change these addresses back if you want but be aware that the addr:* tagging is intended to map the postal address onl... | |
| 3 | 2023-12-12 20:26 | SK53 ♦864 | Hi Chris,I don't think this is Paul's fault as this seems to have become the standard, and if he hadn't done it confusedbuffalo would be along real soon now.I'm afraid this ship has sailed; I was shouted down when I suggested addr:postal_town for those who want to clone P... | |
| 137290590 by chillly @ 2023-06-13 15:01 | 1 | 2023-06-13 15:06 | chillly | This is mapped on the ground with a bike, following the signs. The route was well signed. There are two, IMHO, spurious relations that seem to relate to NCN 1 in this area. The main relation (9579) was updated and some routes removed from the super-relation. There is more to do. Please feel free to ... |
| 94144448 by LilyP123 @ 2020-11-15 12:49 | 1 | 2020-11-17 15:50 | chillly | Hi,I'm interested in why you deleted someof the houses in St Mary's Walk in Swanland. Have you replaced them? Why is there a house with just the tag building=house when all the rest of the houses in the village have full addresses. chris |
| 70668308 by kmarjbh @ 2019-05-27 16:42 | 1 | 2020-10-18 17:05 | chillly | The new residential you added is definately a driveway (highway=service, service = driveway). I have changed it |
| 71894779 by CutThroatJake @ 2019-07-04 12:10 | 1 | 2019-11-11 19:51 | chillly | HiI have just noticed that you added a name to the A63, 'Pertuia Way'. I live close by but I haven't ever seen a name board as far as I know. What is your source for that name? The roman name for Brough is Petuaria, is that the name you meant? If so, surely it would be near Brough... |
| 2 | 2019-11-12 08:00 | CutThroatJake ♦4 | Morning ChillySorry for not getting back sooner, I just had to check a few dates.The A63 between Clive Sullivan Way and the M62 was renamed by the Local Authority in Apr 2018 as Petuaria Way, I know this as I'm the custodian of the streets gazetteer for the authority, this was also announce... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-12 09:58 | chillly | Thanks for your reply. I have now found a piece in the local paper about the name change.Thanks for your correction. Happy mapping | |
| 58352787 by ndrw6 @ 2018-04-23 20:56 | 1 | 2019-07-17 09:56 | chillly | Has this roundabout been completed? It looks so on the aerial, but don't know this area. The turn restrictions are invalid as they stand. |
| 2 | 2019-07-17 12:35 | ndrw6 ♦77 | Hi,This is still work in progress. I believe the map accurately represents the current state of construction work but things are changing often.Best regards,ndrw6 | |
| 58266428 by CivilPad @ 2018-04-20 14:51 | 1 | 2018-04-23 13:41 | chillly | Hull CIty Hall is a theatre. The Guildhall is the town hall. |
| 2 | 2018-04-30 17:34 | chillly | No reply for a week, so I have reversed this edit. | |
| 57749695 by chillly @ 2018-04-02 19:19 | 1 | 2018-04-20 18:09 | Yorvik Prestigitator ♦151 | Has the defib machine outside been moved? |
| 2 | 2018-04-20 18:12 | chillly | No, it was still there last week. | |
| 57956723 by mvviveka @ 2018-04-10 01:46 | 1 | 2018-04-13 16:01 | chillly | Why have you changed this? Have you visited the site to see what is really there? |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:22 | Nakaner-repair ♦8,261 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57912073 by mot_tom @ 2018-04-08 12:32 | 1 | 2018-04-13 15:54 | chillly | Did you try to contact the previous editor? |
| 2 | 2018-04-13 16:00 | mot_tom ♦18 | Admitedly not, I'll do that now | |
| 3 | 2020-10-09 17:11 | tomhukins ♦217 | What was the outcome of the conversation? I notice it was added back a month after you removed it in changeset 59091647 but it seems like it doesn't belong here to me. I left it as is in changeset 92248442 in case there's a good reason for it. | |
| 4 | 2020-10-10 17:27 | mot_tom ♦18 | Hi tomhukins, I didn't receive a response from the original editor. Seeing as I don't know the area, I'd err on the side of caution, but equally if you saw no evidence of the path on your recent visit, maybe it should be removed. I don't know! Sorry I can't be more helpful.\... | |
| 5 | 2020-10-13 19:24 | tomhukins ♦217 | Hi, mot_tom. Thanks for letting me know. Cederby has done a more thorough analysis of the situation on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59091647 | |
| 57789098 by Skybunny @ 2018-04-04 02:15 | 1 | 2018-04-07 10:36 | chillly | Where was this mechanical edit discussed? |
| 2 | 2018-04-07 21:00 | Skybunny ♦20 | It wasn't, as I'm sure your question was meant to imply. That said:I've reverted this edit via changeset 57900660 and will not be reinstating the changes. I'll take discussion to the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:denomination%3Dmormon wiki page (the tag for whi... | |
| 57853948 by premtemp2 @ 2018-04-06 05:22 | 1 | 2018-04-07 10:33 | chillly | Why have you changed this? When I last visited the car park and used this entrance it was one-way only. It is too narrow for two-way traffic. Did you visit the site to survey this change? |
| 57636274 by EgrettaGarzetta @ 2018-03-29 14:49 | 1 | 2018-03-30 20:53 | chillly | Errrr, surely the website is copyright. DO you have permission to use this in OSM? We take copyright VERY seriously |
| 2 | 2018-03-30 23:14 | EgrettaGarzetta ♦1 | I understand that, a little better today than yesterday; but does that mean the names of the hostels can't be used without permission or does it mean they can't be used because they're copyright? | |
| 3 | 2018-03-31 11:30 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | @EgrettaGarzetta OSM would need data released under an appropriate licence in order to be able to use it. There's some information at https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright . There's more information over at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import , and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-23 19:58 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | As I read the thread at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-April/thread.html#21270 , YHA haven't given permission for this data to be used. Are you still working to get that permission? | |
| 57425675 by Mauls @ 2018-03-22 14:51 | 1 | 2018-03-30 20:47 | chillly | The A63 is not a motorway, so is this really a motorway junction? Where did you get they name Welton Road Interchange from? I don't recall seeing that name on any signs around the junction, which I regularly use. |
| 56756260 by Nocco @ 2018-02-28 13:32 | 1 | 2018-03-01 15:58 | chillly | The footpaths beside the roads are better to be created by adding sidewalk tags to the road. We don't draw individual footways that run beside a road. I sent you a message about this a few days ago. |
| 56184978 by Shirodashi @ 2018-02-08 14:33 | 1 | 2018-02-10 13:31 | chillly | I would suggest that Queen's Gardens is the sunken area to the west. I wonder why you have added the name also to a small section of the flower beds around the fountain? |
| 2 | 2018-02-10 13:32 | chillly | sry, the area to the east :) | |
| 3 | 2018-02-10 13:34 | chillly | Also, it is usual that small areas do not have a name, so don't be surprised if you can't add a name to the grassed area. Not everything needs a name and we generally only use names that are signed or very well known. | |
| 56082275 by Steeley @ 2018-02-05 11:36 | 1 | 2018-02-08 12:36 | chillly | Hi,I wonder why you have changed the name of the village? The sign boards put by the council say Holme upon Spalding Moor, without hyphens. What is the source used to change the name? |
| 2 | 2018-02-08 16:00 | Steeley ♦5 | I'd come across a couple of businesses that used that name format while searching, and also Wikipedia. However its even more confusing now as the parish council goes by "Holme on Spalding Moor" (not upon). And then there is this page which uses no hypens in the title, and hypens in th... | |
| 55876943 by Pete Owens @ 2018-01-30 00:06 | 1 | 2018-01-31 18:15 | chillly | Of course people can ride on the A63, why would you think otherwise, so why would this tag litter be needed. There is a proposal to restrict bicycles on part of the A63. That would then be a clear deviation from the norm and would be worth tagging and be useful.Are you going to add the tag t... |
| 55877534 by Pete Owens @ 2018-01-30 00:48 | 1 | 2018-01-31 18:04 | chillly | This seems pretty pointless. No motorways allow cycling. What is the point of this beyond tag litter? |
| 55521499 by BraveDave1 @ 2018-01-17 13:16 | 1 | 2018-01-19 16:18 | chillly | Hi,I think the road is not a residential road, but a service road (highway=service). |
| 55302140 by Legolash2oLiam @ 2018-01-09 19:34 | 1 | 2018-01-10 11:01 | chillly | This seems an odd edit. Why have you added Hull Port as a locality in the middle of a named dock? AFAIK 'Hull Port' does not exist. What are you trying to do with this edit? |
| 2 | 2018-01-10 11:20 | Legolash2oLiam ♦6 | I've moved it to a better place (more centre and on land). I think it should be on the boundary but others had done a node, so a followed that pattern.Rather than displaying all the docks on my visualisation, I'd rather just have the port itself. This particular port is owned by AB... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-10 11:26 | Legolash2oLiam ♦6 | I also fixed its name to 'The Port of Hull' to match literature based on it. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-10 11:38 | chillly | Hmmm, this still doesn't seem very good. 'The Port of Hull' is a better name, but it's not a locality IMHO - it's a port. Adding stuff in an arbitrary place with a dubious tag so it appears on your own render is not a great way of editing. Maybe there's a seamark tag fo... | |
| 5 | 2018-01-10 12:17 | Legolash2oLiam ♦6 | It wasn't just for my own visualisation, there's other ways I can do that. I'd rather share when I can; unless it's confidential.I half agree with the 'arbitrary' part but I fully agree with you on the 'locality' tag, as it didn't seem right. As I sai... | |
| 54982100 by Mojoblackwhite @ 2017-12-28 12:41 | 1 | 2017-12-30 14:53 | chillly | Thanks for the detail. I would not add footway=sideway to ordinary footways. Sidewalk implies they are beside a road, but these are not.HTH |
| 54898225 by Utopia331 @ 2017-12-25 00:21 | 1 | 2017-12-26 13:55 | chillly | The park you added was already mapped, in more detail so I removed this park |
| 54462095 by CutThroatJake @ 2017-12-08 15:41 | 1 | 2017-12-11 12:50 | chillly | This is an interesting change. Where have you seen property addresses that point to this change? What does the road sign on the end of the street say? |
| 2 | 2017-12-11 19:47 | CutThroatJake ♦4 | Hi ChillyThe two street nameplates show ROSEBERY Avenue, as shown in Google Earth. I can provide screenshots if requested. The address information is from any of the major house buying websites and other street | |
| 3 | 2017-12-11 20:13 | chillly | Thanks for the info. We MUST NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES use any information from Google in OSM, EVER!!!!I hope this is clear. You cannot copy google maps, Google Streetview, Google Earth or any other Google source. It is expressly forbidden in their terms or use. OSM is based on being able... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-11 20:20 | chillly | I should have added that websites are also copyright and cannot be used unless the data is explicitly released in a compatible form. (everything is copyright automatically, so unless there is a licence to allow you to use that info it is not suitable for use in OSM). | |
| 5 | 2017-12-11 20:33 | CutThroatJake ♦4 | Sorry Chilly, should have explained better, I work for the organisation that manufactured and installed the nameplate. It is in the public domain, i.e. visible. I only used GE to save a 30 mile round trip but I can guarantee it's accuracy in this instance. | |
| 6 | 2017-12-11 20:40 | chillly | That make a huge difference. :-) | |
| 54338677 by markhealey @ 2017-12-04 18:40 | 1 | 2017-12-05 17:50 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYour cycleways are welcome detail. Creating any road or path needs to join up to the existing network. Does the cycleway cross the road where it ends? If so I would join it to the road there. The one that crosses the roads at the south of the roundabout is an example. |
| 54219844 by NeilYorks @ 2017-12-01 00:02 | 1 | 2017-12-02 16:02 | chillly | Welcome to OSMBuildings are very welcome detail, but I think these are semi-detached, ie they are each two houses. This becomes important when addresses are added, which is the best case. If you need help or hints, feel free to ask.Chris |
| 54241876 by Nocco @ 2017-12-01 16:40 | 1 | 2017-12-02 15:58 | chillly | Please change the changeset comments. These changes have nothing to do with pond and pond. |
| 54241448 by Nocco @ 2017-12-01 16:29 | 1 | 2017-12-02 15:57 | chillly | Welcome to OSMAre these really ponds? The one in the industrial area around Salt End looks like a building with a blue roof on the imagery. The one in the allotments just looks like part of an allotment to me.Do you have better info than the imagery or was this a starting experiment that got... |
| 54248548 by Dogismo @ 2017-12-01 20:27 | 1 | 2017-12-01 21:50 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI wonder why you think there are parks in such strange places. Could it be that you thunk it will attract Pokemon?If you want to add real stuff in the right place correctly described you will be very welcome, but junk will just get removed |
| 54059779 by Mapmoo @ 2017-11-24 21:02 | 1 | 2017-11-29 16:21 | chillly | Why have you added a second chemist which not where the buildings are? |
| 2 | 2017-11-29 16:51 | Mapmoo ♦2 | I could not replace the location,which was in the wrong place,the chemist is at the extreme corner of Westbourne and Chanterlands ave | |
| 3 | 2017-11-29 17:32 | chillly | We place points of interest in it's real place. If you use the aerial imagery you can see that the existing chemist is in the right place because it over the building on the corner. The buildings are set back from the roads.The name is not Boots the Chemist. The shop is called Boots. Some ... | |
| 54095513 by JEA4004 @ 2017-11-26 13:44 | 1 | 2017-11-29 16:25 | chillly | Hi, Welcome to OSMThe building was already named as RockCity. Your tags are useful and improve the info, but by adding them to a separate node (point) you have now created two RockCity descriptions. I would have added the extra info to the building rather than create a new node, but I guess that... |
| 53819989 by Guy @ 2017-11-15 21:14 | 1 | 2017-11-19 18:55 | chillly | Could you please use more descriptive changeset comments. 'Improvements' really is too brief. |
| 53540902 by Hb- @ 2017-11-05 22:12 | 1 | 2017-11-08 11:20 | chillly | THis is a mechanical edit, and against the mechanical edit rules. This MUST be discussed BEFORE you make these edits. I recommend this is reverted, then discussed and only if agreement is reached, make an edit like this. |
| 2 | 2017-11-08 13:38 | Hb- ♦290 | Hi chillly, thanks for your comment. Replacing "substance=sewer" etc. with "substance=sewage" did not seem appropriate for a longer discussion. Please recommend a place (URL) to discuss edits like this in the future. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-08 13:53 | chillly | The fact you don't think the edit was important enough to discuss just shows how opinions differ. Mechanical edits upset mappers. Mappers are our most precious resource. See the rules here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conductYou can start discussions on IRC o... | |
| 4 | 2017-11-08 14:20 | Hb- ♦290 | Thanks for the hint to the Wiki. I hope to find time to translate it to German. The beef is in the second sentence: "… to make other systematic edits … without consideration of each change." Be assured that I invoked every way, checked it and it's surrounding and ONL... | |
| 5 | 2017-11-09 01:25 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | I have no problem with the changes - my suggestion would be to provide a better changeset comment. If you had said "Changing substance=sewer -> sewage in pipelines to properly describe the substance carried" it would have been more obvious what you changed :) | |
| 53548383 by Hb- @ 2017-11-06 08:39 | 1 | 2017-11-08 11:21 | chillly | You MUST stop making these mechanical edits. These MUST be discussed before you make them. Revert this now |
| 2 | 2017-11-08 13:43 | Hb- ♦290 | Hi chilly,please recommend a place (URL) to discuss edits like this. I will apply to that forum/board/mailling list and present the changes there. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-08 14:21 | Hb- ♦290 | My edits were not "automated". For further discussion please see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53540902 | |
| 4 | 2017-11-10 10:54 | smaprs ♦378 | The place for discussing large edits globally changing objects already mapped is the OSM international talk list, by email, here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/ | |
| 53499077 by thetornado76 @ 2017-11-04 09:25 | 1 | 2017-11-06 21:02 | chillly | This looks like an undiscussed mechanical edit. You MUST discuss edits like this before you make them and get broad agreement in the area, GB in this case.You MUST not assume the wiki is correct. |
| 2 | 2017-11-07 04:16 | thetornado76 ♦162 | No, this was not a mechanical edit. I had only change same never accepted tags and sometime misspell e.g. "amenity=Health Centre" changed to the accepted healthcare=centreI know the wiki ist correct. Therefore I had changed this. | |
| 3 | 2017-11-07 09:31 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173985450/history you haven't "changed" anything, you've just removed one tag. One of the reasons why mechanical edits such as this one should be discussed is that someone might be consuming that tag. It's highly unlikely that anyone wo... | |
| 4 | 2017-11-07 13:33 | thetornado76 ♦162 | In this case I had deleted this tag, because it was double - healthcare is the accepted tag.I think it is not helpful, to add a new or a own useless medical tag, when there is a accepted tag.I will not remove more useless medical tags | |
| 5 | 2017-11-07 16:10 | SK53 ♦864 | It is a highly dubious statement that "healthcare is the accepted tag". Certainly in the UK medical facilities are much more likely to be mapped using the amenity key. The various healthcare tagging schemas advocated on the wiki have never received much mainstream support from mappers, by ... | |
| 6 | 2017-11-07 16:32 | thetornado76 ♦162 | This is correct. Amenity=doctors is the most accepted tag for healthcare Worldwide. But I don't want to change it from centre to doctor. Because the tag which I had changed was medical_centre. Therefore I used the healthcare tag.If you want you can also add amenity doctors. | |
| 52971816 by Dominique Job @ 2017-10-16 05:31 | 1 | 2017-10-20 12:58 | chillly | "Improvement of map accuracy" is not a very helpful changeset comment. How did you improve things? What did you improve? Is there a common thread to the edit?It really helps reviewers. |
| 52037817 by ForstEK @ 2017-09-14 13:35 | 1 | 2017-09-16 14:15 | chillly | This looks like a mechanical edit. Where was this discussed?Undiscussed mechanical edits destroys confidence from other mappers. This should be reverted and discussed fully. |
| 2 | 2017-09-16 16:52 | ForstEK ♦213 | Hi!how you can view here I correct outdated tag "type=gas" to "substance=gas" according wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline (here describes that tag 'type' uses only for multipolygons). http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Oil_... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-16 17:25 | Владимир К ♦1,775 | This was discussed on telegram channel :) | |
| 51697271 by confusedbuffalo @ 2017-09-03 16:49 | 1 | 2017-09-07 18:39 | chillly | This looks like an undiscussed mass edit. |
| 2 | 2017-09-08 16:03 | confusedbuffalo ♦333 | I can see why you say that, but I felt that this was acceptable. Firstly, it's only changing the tags, not keys.Secondly, I feel that it is important to have phone numbers callable internationally, particularly with the increasing use of OSM data in smartphone apps. When travelling, I expect ... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-08 16:29 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | For clarity re "When travelling, I expect to be able to tap on a phone number and for it to work, without me having to enter the country code at that time", you can. If you're roaming on another country's network you can just dial local numbers with no country code, just as if y... | |
| 4 | 2017-09-08 17:05 | chillly | Your premise explaining why the international code is wrong. You can dial any number in the UK using only the area code (known as the STD code in the UK) and the local number. If you visit the UK with a roaming phone you still do not need the international code (+44). You only need that if you are c... | |
| 5 | 2017-09-11 20:09 | confusedbuffalo ♦333 | I hadn't realised that about dialling numbers | |
| 51777441 by CyrilleMdC @ 2017-09-06 10:56 | 1 | 2017-09-07 18:41 | chillly | I would suggest that these are highway footway, but not sidewalk. Sidewalk is a walkway beside a road. These are just footways. |
| 2 | 2017-09-10 21:03 | CyrilleMdC ♦2 | Oops, yup. Thanks for this!C- | |
| 51583339 by bigalxyz123 @ 2017-08-30 15:25 | 1 | 2017-09-07 18:37 | chillly | Please add comments to your edits so other people know what your edit is about |
| 51567341 by Libretto2001 @ 2017-08-30 08:28 | 1 | 2017-09-07 18:36 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.We don't tag stuff twice, so adding the info to the building is good. There's no need to add a node too.HTH |
| 51662611 by Libretto2001 @ 2017-09-02 07:34 | 1 | 2017-09-07 18:35 | chillly | Hi,You can add the tags to the whole building, rather than adding a node (map point) as well. If a building has more than one business or use then nodes make sense. |
| 51483109 by anatomism @ 2017-08-27 14:14 | 1 | 2017-08-30 17:47 | chillly | Private driveways can be mapped. When they are an obvious landmark, like that one, it can be added. The tagging may have been wrong, but rather than delete it, you could change the tagging. A private driveway would be tagged as: highway=service, service=driveway, access=private. |
| 51358533 by DawnShine @ 2017-08-22 23:14 | 1 | 2017-08-26 08:46 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for your additions and for improving the tagging. If you have any questions please feel free to ask. |
| 51308031 by chendriks @ 2017-08-21 14:23 | 1 | 2017-08-21 14:28 | chillly | You appear to have added the whole garden surrounding the house as though it is a house. I would draw the building footprint as the house and if you want the garden then draw the outline of the garden and tag that as leisure=garden, access=private. HTH |
| 51307757 by chendriks @ 2017-08-21 14:13 | 1 | 2017-08-21 14:25 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIf Daisy Court is a private road you can add access=private.HTH |
| 2 | 2017-08-22 16:11 | chendriks ♦1 | Thank you, will do in future. | |
| 51149076 by Mike Baggaley @ 2017-08-15 18:47 | 1 | 2017-08-17 10:23 | chillly | The name on the board above the shop front is 'Chemist'. I surveyed it and it is still so.Please don't just armchair this stuff - check first!I will revert your change. |
| 2 | 2017-08-17 10:36 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | The name is not Chemist, it is P. Rowbotham Dispensing Chemist according to http://www.nhs.uk/Services/pharmacies/Overview/DefaultView.aspx?id=5007. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-17 11:07 | chillly | The name on the shop says 'Chemist'. I know that because I have been there. You cannot use copyright sources to update the name. I will revert your change and ask the DWG to intervene if you use copyright sources in OSM again. | |
| 4 | 2017-08-17 11:09 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | You will find his name is also on the front of the shop. | |
| 5 | 2017-08-17 11:10 | chillly | Which is why I added the name as the operator. | |
| 6 | 2017-08-17 11:19 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | I suggest in the spirit of compromise the name be set to either P Rowbotham Chemist. or just P Rowbotham. The name of the business is clearly not Chemist. | |
| 7 | 2017-08-17 11:27 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | I also note that the NHS Choices data is made available under the Open Government Licence - see http://www.nhs.uk/aboutNHSChoices/aboutnhschoices/how-we-perform/Pages/datasets.aspx. | |
| 8 | 2017-08-17 11:33 | chillly | Wow, just how far are you going with this?Read the link again. DOWNLOADED files are OGL, the web page you directed me to is copyright. I doubt anyone in the NHS would care, but you were prepared to use a copyright source before you then checked to try to climb out of the hole you just dug. J... | |
| 51184055 by Dr Mark @ 2017-08-16 19:01 | 1 | 2017-08-16 19:43 | chillly | Hello, Someone who was adding population numbers has just been blocked. So is this a way to circumvent being blocked, or are you a genuine new editor? Is the 2011 census data released under an open licence? Is there information about this? |
| 2 | 2017-08-16 20:06 | Dr Mark ♦1 | Hi Chillly,I had no idea that anyone had been blocked for adding population numbers. I was looking for ways to use OpenStreetMap for Parish Council and local political work, and was trying to find a way to display ward and district boundaries. While doing that I saw that there was no population ... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-16 20:13 | Dr Mark ♦1 | The Open Government Licence can be viewed here: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/Mark. | |
| 4 | 2017-08-16 20:13 | chillly | Thanks for the reply. OGL is fine, but oddly wikipedia isn't always a safe source - we don't know where that came from. Your edit looks fine based on OGL.The parish boundaries for much of GB have been added, it looks like your village has too. The purple dotted line show the boundary. ... | |
| 5 | 2017-08-16 20:31 | Dr Mark ♦1 | I hadn't thought about displaying OSM on the village website but that's a really good idea.What I was looking at was delivery of leaflets, newsletters and so on in the local area. I contested the 2017 County Council election and am looking to be a candidate for the 2019 District Council ... | |
| 6 | 2017-08-16 20:43 | chillly | The map is created by volunteers. It looks as though no one has put the hours in to draw the houses in your village. A quick look at the aerial imagery tells me they could be traced from there, but it's a long job and not your real intention.Electoral ward boundaries are not in OSM. I don&#... | |
| 51100923 by Polyglot @ 2017-08-14 07:23 | 1 | 2017-08-14 14:02 | Noen ♦316 | Hi!This changeset seems to focus on splitting roads on public_transport=stop_position nodes at the start/end of bus routes. Is this really necessary?There is a warning for this in the JOSM validator, but i can't find anything on this issue in wiki.openstreetmap, the talk mailing list or the... |
| 2 | 2017-08-14 14:13 | Polyglot ♦86 | I started doing this in bus stations, but I'm convinced that it makes a lot of sense at the beginning and end of the routes.I'm 'traveling' around the world to test the PT_Assistant plugin and also to see how public transport is being mapped in different places. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-14 15:13 | chillly | So you're not really travelling and seeing what is really there, you're making undiscussed, mass edits from the comfort of your armchair. Do you think this is a good idea and that it is acceptable? | |
| 4 | 2017-08-14 16:13 | Polyglot ♦86 | Of course I think it's acceptable or I wouldn'tbe doing it. I agree the changesets are big and it would be better that locals do them.They take hours of time to work on though. Splitting ways has the consequence of affecting several other route relations, which in turn need to checked to... | |
| 51004332 by drmattstallard @ 2017-08-10 15:04 | 1 | 2017-08-10 16:52 | chillly | Welcome to OSM,It is a common beginner's mistake to use the name tag as a description. Does the trig point really have a name 'Orton Hill Triangulation Pillar' on a name board at the location? If not then just don't use the name tag - many things don't have a name. |
| 50979604 by Pingu's Beak @ 2017-08-09 17:35 | 1 | 2017-08-09 18:16 | chillly | Hi,It's good you removed the coastline tag. I expected you to respond to my comment, then we could try to help. I'm still not sure what your source is. Would you tell me where did you get this information from please. |
| 50979346 by Pingu's Beak @ 2017-08-09 17:20 | 1 | 2017-08-09 17:34 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI think you have tried to show a proposed new road. You haven't added a comment to the edit which would help make that clearer. You have added what I think is the new road as coastline. This is very odd, is there any reason for this? What is the source for this new roa... |
| 50707088 by Gabriel Reynolds @ 2017-07-31 04:10 | 1 | 2017-08-01 17:17 | chillly | Hi,Please add useful changeset comments. '.' really doesn't help understand what and why you are changing. |
| 50680079 by John & Felicity @ 2017-07-29 20:37 | 1 | 2017-08-01 17:14 | chillly | Hi,Adding the designated= xxx is not widely using the UK. It is intended to show a specific legal restriction which often doesn't apply in the UK. In the UK it is more common to use designation=public_footpath or designation-public_bridleway. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kin... |
| 50630943 by Anita999 @ 2017-07-27 20:22 | 1 | 2017-07-27 20:40 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have moved a shop in Tate Modern into the Thames. Did you realise that you were editing real, live data? Would you like any help sorting this out? |
| 2 | 2017-07-27 20:59 | Anita999 ♦1 | Hi chillly, no sorry had no idea what I was doing! umm yes, help would be great! Thanks | |
| 3 | 2017-07-27 21:00 | chillly | OK, starting out can be hard at first. I'll put the shop back where it was.If you need help, please ask and I'll try to help. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-27 21:02 | Anita999 ♦1 | Thanks so much! I will try not to move buildings into the water next time :) | |
| 50630915 by Anita999 @ 2017-07-27 20:21 | 1 | 2017-07-27 20:42 | chillly | I have reverted (undone) this edit. It looks like an experimental edit. |
| 50540164 by Safet Mustafaj @ 2017-07-24 20:59 | 1 | 2017-07-24 21:23 | chillly | Looks much better, thanks. |
| 50538503 by Safet Mustafaj @ 2017-07-24 19:56 | 1 | 2017-07-24 19:58 | JamesKingdom ♦98 | Deleted in #50538537 |
| 2 | 2017-07-24 19:58 | chillly | Why was this deleted so quickly, with no comments? | |
| 3 | 2017-07-24 20:31 | chillly | I've reinstated the point. I needs moving over the top of the building that business is in, and then it will be a useful addition to the map.If you have any questions, please ask. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-24 20:48 | Safet Mustafaj ♦1 | Hi, sorry I didn't mean to delete any points. thanks for your help. Is the business on the map now? | |
| 5 | 2017-07-24 20:52 | chillly | Welcome to OSM No problem, you didn't delete the point, a rather too hasty monitor did. You added the business and all looks well, except you added it to the road rather than over the building the business operates from. Please move it to the side of the road to where the business really is... | |
| 6 | 2017-07-25 17:25 | JamesKingdom ♦98 | Sorry for my hastiness, and assuming that this place is non-existent, I will take more time to check next time, and not just delete the point without looking. | |
| 50539799 by e3b45 @ 2017-07-24 20:43 | 1 | 2017-07-24 20:47 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added the publishers twice. I suggest you delete one of the points.Feel free to ask any questions. |
| 2 | 2017-07-24 21:25 | e3b45 ♦1 | OSMAND wasnt uploading so tried a couple of times and one must of uploaded without confirming. How do I delete? Can't see an option on firefox for android | |
| 3 | 2017-07-25 16:41 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Also I assume that the node should be in one of the buildings, please could you reposition it? | |
| 4 | 2017-07-25 21:50 | e3b45 ♦1 | I moved the POI and deleted the duplicate. | |
| 50502202 by Tom8765 @ 2017-07-23 13:43 | 1 | 2017-07-23 14:50 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have deleted a lot of stuff, none of which looks like it should be deleted to me. Why have you deleted this stuff? As a beginner you may not have realised you were deleting live data from the shared database. I also notice you are using the Merkaartor editor. This... |
| 50487944 by PietroPavese @ 2017-07-22 19:38 | 1 | 2017-07-22 20:51 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail.We mark objects either by a single point or (better still) by drawing an area. When we place the single point we try to position it around the middle of the object. Adding a farm to the middle of a road is not how it is usually done. The aerial imagery sh... |
| 2 | 2017-07-22 20:58 | PietroPavese ♦1 | Great, thank you. I'm just starting and I was purely having a look at functions. Do you know if there is a way to add house names to the map? | |
| 3 | 2017-07-22 21:22 | chillly | To add a house name I would always draw the outline of the house footprint, add a building tag and add the address tags. Don't use the name tag for a house name (common mistake) as that is for, say, a business name in a building. E.g a shop might have a building name as part of the address but ... | |
| 50456257 by FruTBunn @ 2017-07-21 11:38 | 1 | 2017-07-21 11:53 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI think you have got some wires crossed. You have added the details of a pub to a bus stop which is named after the pub nearby. Adding the pub, with its full details, would be good, but the pub details need removing from the bus stop. You can't buy a beer at a bus stop! :-) |
| 50441510 by Studio-MBE040 @ 2017-07-20 20:15 | 1 | 2017-07-20 20:24 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have changed the building name from 'Victoria House and Dorset House' to 'Mail Boxes Etc.'This seems an unlikely name for a building. It is a common beginner's mistake to use the name tag for a description. Would you like me to revert (und... |
| 50232241 by Rowland @ 2017-07-12 14:25 | 1 | 2017-07-18 11:26 | chillly | Please add comments to your changes as you save them. It helps everyone else understand what the changes are your are making |
| 50211622 by Starbeamrainbowlabs @ 2017-07-11 20:13 | 1 | 2017-07-18 11:22 | chillly | This is a stadium, but it's also a building. It needs the building tag. I'm adding a building tag. |
| 50236094 by digi door @ 2017-07-12 17:19 | 1 | 2017-07-12 18:21 | chillly | Just what is this? Is this some kind of incomplete edit, or some advertising spam? |
| 50229999 by Gayle Abbott @ 2017-07-12 13:11 | 1 | 2017-07-12 17:19 | chillly | This is not a university. please stop adding university to all the objects within the area of the university. This is incorrect tagging. Are you going to remove these? |
| 2 | 2017-07-17 15:00 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | The "water-based hockey pitch university" has been fixed, but there is still a "national throws centre university" at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58404006 . | |
| 50229413 by Gayle Abbott @ 2017-07-12 12:49 | 1 | 2017-07-12 17:18 | chillly | You really need to remove the univerity from all these buildings. Please stop doing this |
| 50229383 by Gayle Abbott @ 2017-07-12 12:47 | 1 | 2017-07-12 17:17 | chillly | Welcome to OSMWe only tag each object once. Loughborough University is tagged for the site as a whole. Tagging it on each building makes it look as though there are lots of universities. If you have questions please ask. |
| 50152563 by Starbeamrainbowlabs @ 2017-07-09 13:19 | 1 | 2017-07-10 14:12 | chillly | Welcome to OSM, thanks for your edits.We usually add names in mixed case: Hica Group, though if HICA is capitalised as initials it might be HICA Group. |
| 2 | 2017-07-11 19:57 | Starbeamrainbowlabs ♦2 | Ah, I didn't actually fill out the name here, as I was doing this through the app. I'll certainly correct this though to the right capitalisation. Thanks for the tip! | |
| 3 | 2017-07-11 19:59 | Starbeamrainbowlabs ♦2 | A note though: This whole building doesn't actually belong to HICA Group. There's another business in one section building too. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-11 20:02 | chillly | I would probably divide the building. Effectivly we draw two buildings so two walls exactly overlap and share the nodes. You can see that in Wright Street nearby. Then you can tag each building separately. | |
| 49941115 by Starbeamrainbowlabs @ 2017-06-30 10:56 | 1 | 2017-07-10 14:16 | chillly | Thanks for the details. The church address is not Hull, but Anlaby Common. The boundary fall where Hull Road turns into Anlaby Road. If you do add an address to any building in Hull we use the city name as Kingston upon Hull so all the buildings are consistently tagged. |
| 2 | 2017-07-11 20:00 | Starbeamrainbowlabs ♦2 | Ah ok, sure! I've updated that now. | |
| 50176535 by chris dadswell @ 2017-07-10 13:25 | 1 | 2017-07-10 13:29 | chillly | H, Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a cafe, both to the definition of East Sussex and to the route of the SOuth Downs Way. The cafe is a good thing to add, but it's not part of either of the definitions. I'll keep the cafe, but remove it from those relations. Please feel free to ... |
| 2 | 2017-07-10 13:33 | chillly | The addr:city tag is a bit confusing for new starters sometimes. It doesn't just mean city, if the address is a town or village then that goes in the city tag. I'm not sure what the place is, so I left it unchanged. | |
| 50013331 by Matthew Howell @ 2017-07-03 16:22 | 1 | 2017-07-09 14:18 | chillly | Thanks for your latest edits.You are using the name tag as a description, for example 'Lowfield Lane to A63'. We only use the name tag for signed names. The fact that it link Lowfield Lane and the A63 is clear from the geometry. The 'South Hunsley Footpath (Students Only)' is p... |
| 50114053 by Billy orson @ 2017-07-07 17:14 | 1 | 2017-07-07 17:19 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added some 'Village Character Areas'. What area these, what is your source for this information? Why are these related to Zebra crossings?The way you have described this is not going to fit in with existing and the render on the Standard map looks very odd.... |
| 2 | 2017-07-07 17:27 | Colin Smale ♦319 | We cannot leave the West Hanney parish boundary as it is, as it is geometrically illegal (outer ring within another outer ring) so I will fix that immediately without deleting your additions. | |
| 50066283 by Provo Steel Buildings @ 2017-07-05 19:03 | 1 | 2017-07-05 19:22 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.This seems a strange edit. Have you made a mistake?Why have you added a business in Southwark (London, UK) with a US address? |
| 49992941 by loguk @ 2017-07-02 20:11 | 1 | 2017-07-02 20:29 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.It looks as though the entrance might be a bit closer to Coleford. Rather than adding a point, it would be better to draw the road, perhaps tagged as highway:construction while it is being built. If you use the DigitalGlobal standard imagery in the editor (newer than the default o... |
| 49991472 by CS-D @ 2017-07-02 18:55 | 1 | 2017-07-02 19:36 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Thanks for trying to add the detail. The item has already been mapped with a lot of detail. It has been added to the building outline. Maps.Me, sadly, only allows you to add details to a point, which is rather simplistic. You might like to look at the online editor to be able to add... |
| 49902635 by es0teric @ 2017-06-28 21:17 | 1 | 2017-06-28 21:30 | chillly | reverted |
| 49875534 by es0teric @ 2017-06-27 23:01 | 1 | 2017-06-28 21:12 | chillly | reverted |
| 49875555 by es0teric @ 2017-06-27 23:03 | 1 | 2017-06-28 21:11 | chillly | reverted |
| 49875677 by es0teric @ 2017-06-27 23:14 | 1 | 2017-06-28 21:10 | chillly | reverted |
| 49902482 by es0teric @ 2017-06-28 21:07 | 1 | 2017-06-28 21:09 | chillly | Please stop adding this rubbish or will have your account suspended.If you want to add real stuff, please do, but not this rubbish. |
| 49902344 by es0teric @ 2017-06-28 21:00 | 1 | 2017-06-28 21:06 | chillly | This looks to be rubbish. Did you mean to save this? Do you need any help cleaning this up or would you like me to revert (undo) it? |
| 49899650 by AliWes100 @ 2017-06-28 18:58 | 1 | 2017-06-28 19:23 | chillly | Welcome to OSMRather than removing a footpath or track, you could add access tags to make it a private footpath or track. The fact the path exists is a good reason to have it on OSM. Someone will see it is missing and add it again. If you mark it as private anyone seeing the map will see the path ... |
| 2 | 2017-06-28 19:25 | AliWes100 ♦1 | The path does not exist | |
| 3 | 2017-06-28 19:25 | chillly | OK | |
| 49724373 by RossH1 @ 2017-06-21 15:56 | 1 | 2017-06-21 16:03 | chillly | Welcome to OSMHas someone really converted a house to a restaurant and called it Test?I think this needs to be removed as a restaurant. |
| 2 | 2017-06-28 12:33 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | @chillly Maybe they're waiting for someone to remove their test data before writing up their dissertation on "how robust OSM is to vandalism"! | |
| 3 | 2017-06-28 12:41 | chillly | @SomeoneElse you're right, time to remove the junk | |
| 49841536 by rokrmo @ 2017-06-26 17:05 | 1 | 2017-06-26 17:11 | chillly | Narnia? This looks like some kind of joke or testing. Maybe you didn't expect that your edit would be shared publically, but it is.Would you like some help sorting this out? |
| 2 | 2017-06-26 17:12 | rokrmo ♦1 | yes was just testing | |
| 3 | 2017-06-26 17:13 | chillly | OK, I will revert (undo) this edit. If you need any help, feel free to ask. | |
| 4 | 2017-06-26 17:14 | rokrmo ♦1 | thanks | |
| 49769444 by Martin Wynne @ 2017-06-23 12:25 | 1 | 2017-06-23 14:23 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Hi Martin, is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502622232 really a park? It looks a very odd place for a park, and aerial imagery suggests it isn't.Also it is bad practice to join areas such as this to the centreline of roads. The area will end at the edge and should be mapped as such.Che... |
| 2 | 2017-06-23 15:34 | Martin Wynne ♦15 | Hi Phil,I use "park" for any public green space with trees or shrubs, because there doesn't seem to be any other designation available. I have noticed the same used in lots of other places on OSM. "Grass" is ok for plain grass, but this clearly isn't that - see: http... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-23 17:02 | chillly | mapping landuse boundaries to the centre lines of roads is not good practice. Your explanation sounds good, but in practice we don't do it. Creating a map image is only one use of OSM data and whatever your renderer of choice does to make the result neatest is not a good justification. A park, ... | |
| 4 | 2017-06-23 17:12 | EdLoach ♦171 | Personally I'd have mapped it as an area of (mostly) grass and perhaps added an occasional natural=tree node (similarly when I mark an area as wood or forest I don't usually map holes for every clearing in the trees). I also don't like to think about the amount of time I've had t... | |
| 5 | 2017-06-23 17:17 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Please do not tag for the render, a park should only be used for area that are really parks. Mapping is not about making something appear a particular colour on one particular renderer. If I had brought my grandkids here because OSM says there is a park then they and I will be pretty pissed off.Fr... | |
| 6 | 2017-06-23 17:24 | Martin Wynne ♦15 | Hi Ed, You wrote " (in this case I'd have probably extended the residential area across the residential roads to the edge of the grass area)."This surely illustrates my point - a road is no more a residential area than it is a park.I found this on the Wiki: "If you choose... | |
| 7 | 2017-06-23 17:24 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Hi MartinI forgot to say we do not have permission to use g.maps so please do not look at it, use it to check something, use it to illustrate something. Mapping must be done from what you have seen by being there, imagery we have permission to use, and out of copyright maps and information. | |
| 8 | 2017-06-23 17:33 | Martin Wynne ♦15 | Hi Phil,It is clearly not scrub. There is a suggestion on the Wiki to make it village_green for public green space, but that doesn't sound right here.If you want to visit a proper municipal park, it is likely to have a name, such as "Jubilee Gardens" or whatever.p.s. I hav... | |
| 9 | 2017-06-23 17:43 | Martin Wynne ♦15 | p.s. I have been there. I use Google Streetview only to confirm my memory of what I saw. Mostly I use OS OpenData to align buildings, water-courses, etc. Also the NLS 25K maps are very useful. The Bing aerial is very poor quality for seeing details.Will the NLS 25" historic maps ever be ava... | |
| 49747398 by Saidtheguru @ 2017-06-22 13:42 | 1 | 2017-06-22 14:22 | chillly | Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the edit.I have a couple of comments. It would be usual to use building=house when you know it's a house. Postcodes have a space in them: HU17 7EN. Postcodes are especially useful for routing and satnavs, so getting the format right helps.If you have any quest... |
| 2 | 2017-06-22 15:09 | chillly | Looking at this again, Is Church Road in Beverley or Molescroft? If it is Molescroft then the addr:city should be Molescroft. The term 'city' is a bit confusing. It gets used for any place, so the houses in a village would get addr:city set to the village name. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-22 16:56 | Saidtheguru ♦1 | It sounds like i should put Molescroft, when we moved i tried to determine the correct postal address and that is Beverley, HU17 7EN | |
| 4 | 2017-06-22 17:01 | chillly | The Royal Mail's view of addresses can be very obscure and certainly only one company's version of things. I'd use Molescroft. | |
| 49618977 by OldBasilBear @ 2017-06-17 17:08 | 1 | 2017-06-17 17:34 | chillly | Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the edit. Judging by the title you are adding some sort of route specific to a group or event. The way you have added it means it won't really show up. We only add routes that are signed and permanent.To show a route overlay on an OSM map you might like to look ... |
| 2 | 2017-06-18 18:00 | OldBasilBear ♦1 | Thanks for the information. The walk is part of a butterfly transect and does follow signed footpaths, but I take you point that it is specific to an organisation.I will have a look at the link for more info.Thanks again. | |
| 49596372 by Dirk Juttemeier @ 2017-06-16 16:34 | 1 | 2017-06-16 16:47 | chillly | Welcome to OSM, thanks for the detail. We normally use the name tag on buildings for business names and use the address housename tag for the building name. Adding extra address info, such as postcode, is also helpful.You could have added the housename tag to the building outline, but some p... |
| 49541036 by Petr Šmejkal @ 2017-06-14 20:52 | 1 | 2017-06-14 20:57 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Thanks for the detail. The address details are useful, but they belong in the address tags.The name tag should just have the name of the bar in it.Hope that helps. |
| 49525224 by Bowlsman @ 2017-06-14 10:17 | 1 | 2017-06-14 10:38 | chillly | Welcome to OSM. I've just taken a quick look at the area and a previous editor has marked the whole recreation ground as a pitch (it would be better as a recreation ground). We would then mark specific sports areas as a pitch, with a specific sport added, so a pitch for your bowls green and s... |
| 49462784 by naomihous @ 2017-06-12 10:00 | 1 | 2017-06-12 10:15 | chillly | Welcome to OSM. Thanks for your edit. OSM is not a business directory but we welcome people who add business detail. The details are useful (description borders on an ad :-)) but you have missed off the most important tag: what is this? Is it a shop, an office, a craft ...Please feel free to ask... |
| 49311521 by DaveWebster @ 2017-06-06 16:58 | 1 | 2017-06-06 17:07 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. We map things that are present today and can be checked by someone else at the site. Is there a blue plaque or some other memorial for Stan Laurel? If so, we would map that and there are tags for that. If there is no present day memorial we would not add histor... |
| 49240062 by ChristopherRowland @ 2017-06-04 11:26 | 1 | 2017-06-04 11:55 | chillly | This needs an object type - name is not enough. |
| 2 | 2017-06-04 15:32 | ChristopherRowland ♦3 | Falconers is a residential house. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-04 15:53 | chillly | Then that tag needs adding. Adding a point with details is useful, drawing the area of buildings and adding the tags to the whole area is much better. With a building set back from the road there maybe a service road or driveway to show how one would access the place too. | |
| 49245478 by ChristopherRowland @ 2017-06-04 15:36 | 1 | 2017-06-04 15:50 | chillly | Thanks for trying to sort this out, it is not quite right. You have drawn an area for the house, but you have added the tags to just one of the corners of the house, rather than the whole area of the house. It also needs a tag to say what it is, in this case building=house would be best I think. |
| 49240008 by ChristopherRowland @ 2017-06-04 11:23 | 1 | 2017-06-04 11:52 | chillly | Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the detail.You seem to have added School Lane over the top of Daisy Lane. We only map each object once, so I would have changed the part of Daisy Lane to become School Lane.If you need more info, please ask. |
| 2 | 2017-06-04 15:30 | ChristopherRowland ♦3 | The footpath part is known as Daisy Lane the track from the A283 to the School House is known by the residents of the School House as School Lane. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-04 15:46 | chillly | As it stands part of the footpath lies in the same place as School Lane, because you just added school lane over the top of Daisy Lane. Is that section School Lane or Daisy Lane, it can't be both. If both exist then they must be side-by-side not in exactly the same place.Also, you have not ... | |
| 49240211 by ChristopherRowland @ 2017-06-04 11:34 | 1 | 2017-06-04 11:59 | chillly | I wonder why you have deleted these things? Are they wrong? Have they been removed? |
| 49240124 by ChristopherRowland @ 2017-06-04 11:29 | 1 | 2017-06-04 11:58 | chillly | You might like to draw the outline of buildings like this. Tag it as building=house and you can add address details from there. A cottage would use the housename tag to specify its name, not the name tag. The name tag is then free if a business is run there too.Please ak if you need more info. |
| 49240051 by ChristopherRowland @ 2017-06-04 11:25 | 1 | 2017-06-04 11:54 | chillly | Adding the Round House is useful, but you always need to add what an object is. Is this a house, a business, an attraction ... ? |
| 2 | 2017-06-04 15:31 | ChristopherRowland ♦3 | The Round House is a residential house. | |
| 49134837 by essexwebstudio @ 2017-05-31 12:39 | 1 | 2017-05-31 14:32 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. You have added lots of detail about the studio, but you have missed off the most important one: what is this? Is it an office (office=*), a shop (shop=*) or what. Without that OSM cannot show the business properly. |
| 49111394 by vfadia @ 2017-05-30 18:18 | 1 | 2017-05-30 18:35 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI see you've deleted your work. Do you need any help? |
| 2 | 2017-05-30 19:03 | vfadia ♦1 | Hi, thanks for offer of your help. I did my first edit to add 2 houses (with separate garages) on the street and uploaded them in one go. However, it seemed the standard layer was showing up as odd shape.Can I make multiple edits and upload once? Will OSM show them with individual boundaries or ... | |
| 49108155 by Donny Yorks @ 2017-05-30 15:56 | 1 | 2017-05-30 16:00 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. It helps a lot to know how the path is surfaced, we use the surface tag to show that. If the path is a public right of way you might like to add designation=public_footpath (or public_bridleway)HTH |
| 49107992 by e3k2 @ 2017-05-30 15:49 | 1 | 2017-05-30 15:56 | chillly | Buildings are best drawn as an area, not a point. If you want to make it clear that it is part of the school (it is within the grounds but an extra tag might help) you can use the tag building=school.HTH |
| 49107877 by e3k2 @ 2017-05-30 15:44 | 1 | 2017-05-30 15:54 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have used 'External Building' as the name. It is common beginner's mistake to add a description as the name. We only use the name tag for things that have a name board or a sign. Is the that building really called 'External Building'? It is also common fo... |
| 49105672 by Business Clan @ 2017-05-30 14:09 | 1 | 2017-05-30 14:21 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail, you have added useful tags, but you have missed off the most important tag - what have you added? Is it an office, a shop, a house ...?The description tag is just free text. You seem to have used it as an ad (OSM is not a business directory but we welcome b... |
| 49029429 by Leonardqu @ 2017-05-27 17:16 | 1 | 2017-05-27 18:59 | chillly | Welcome to OSM OSM is not a business directory, so your advert in the description tag is, IMHO, inappropriate.You have added many useful tags, but a key one is missing. There is no tag to describe the object you have mapped. Is it an office, a shop ... ? |
| 49023976 by stephenmartin @ 2017-05-27 12:35 | 1 | 2017-05-27 12:49 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added an area and given it a name, but not described what it is. The description tag is really only a form or comment. If Tilmore is a suburb there is a place=suburb tab, but it looks a bit small for that so I would use place=neighbourhood. HTH |
| 2 | 2017-05-27 12:50 | stephenmartin ♦2 | Thanks - I'm learning. It is a neighbourhood. | |
| 48979879 by Matthew Nolan @ 2017-05-25 17:26 | 1 | 2017-05-25 17:37 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have created two fitness centres, one in a bus station and anther in the middle of a road junction. You haven't given them names, so that makes it harder to verify them. Are there really two fitness centres in that small area? Were you experimenting and saved your ... |
| 48887960 by shepe @ 2017-05-22 12:59 | 1 | 2017-05-22 13:14 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the details. I see many of the smaller residential roads, including the original part of of Old Farm Close that you have added to, have names in all capital letters. Unless there is a very special reason (which I can't think of) they should be mixed case like the bit ... |
| 2 | 2017-05-22 17:02 | shepe ♦1 | All done (as far as I can see) :) | |
| 48887407 by general_lion @ 2017-05-22 12:37 | 1 | 2017-05-22 13:06 | chillly | Welcome to OSMWe only use real stuff, in the right place correctly described. I will revert (undo) the fun, but imaginary edit |
| 48845104 by EwaGibbs @ 2017-05-20 15:43 | 1 | 2017-05-20 15:48 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIt looks like your first edit has gone a pear-shaped. You look as though you resized a building and just dragged all the stuff joined to it as well. It's not unusual for new starters to make this kind of mistake. Would you like me to revert (undo) this to get a good starting poi... |
| 2 | 2017-05-20 15:53 | chillly | Looking again, I suspect you want to add one unit that is just part of the building. That is a bit harder than just dragging the bigger building around. If you need any help, I'll try. | |
| 48828731 by DrakeBradshaw @ 2017-05-19 18:29 | 1 | 2017-05-19 18:42 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIf you know the road names are wrong, use the editor to change the name. Just have a go. If you make a mistake don't worry, it can be sorted out. |
| 48795968 by Nodwaa @ 2017-05-18 16:04 | 1 | 2017-05-18 17:50 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThe fuel station you have added seems a bit strange. It looks to a row of houses. Have these been demolished? What sort of fuel station is this? |
| 2 | 2017-05-18 18:28 | Nodwaa ♦1 | i do apolagise yes it is a little down from there i shall fix it, thank you its a texico garage | |
| 3 | 2017-05-18 19:21 | chillly | No need to apologise, beginners often make mistakes, it's part of learning. OSM has become more and more complex. If the garage has a name (other than Texaco) you could add the name tag. You can add the brand tag too as Texaco. Any other details help, too. The online editor (rather than map... | |
| 48796320 by HWG Auto Repair @ 2017-05-18 16:21 | 1 | 2017-05-18 17:04 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. I added a shop=car_repair tag. I know you might not think of it as a shop, but that's OSM tagging :-) I also tweaked the address to fit the standard layout too. You might like to draw the buildings, car park and the service road that is the entrance to you... |
| 48768921 by jer35694 @ 2017-05-17 17:35 | 1 | 2017-05-17 17:43 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have had a bit of a battle with this edit. The building of the ambulance station and the wall has been a bit mangled. I think the safest way to sort this out is revert (undo) the edit so you can try again what ever you were doing. Would you like me to revert this edit for... |
| 48762968 by Mb86 @ 2017-05-17 13:19 | 1 | 2017-05-17 15:04 | chillly | Welcome to OSMAre you sure that the aerial imagery isn't out of date? I think the road, cycleway and car park may be there. Have you been to have a look recently? |
| 48761920 by FixStation Bradford @ 2017-05-17 12:45 | 1 | 2017-05-17 12:50 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. You have added a shop (your shop?) right next to the road, rather than in the buildings close to the road. It would be better to move it to the real building. You can add addressing details if you want. That would help people find the shop. You can also add con... |
| 48738088 by stilababe070100 @ 2017-05-16 17:42 | 1 | 2017-05-16 17:54 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have drawn a rough outline of a building but tagged it as landuse=residential. If it's a building you could tag it as a building (building=yes is a start). If it is some kind of residential home there are tagging schemes to describe this. e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.or... |
| 48708770 by David Beaver @ 2017-05-15 18:13 | 1 | 2017-05-16 14:46 | chillly | Hi,Is the area you marked a garden or is it allotments. I see you've tagged it as a garden but your comment indicates it to be an allotment area. Is it an extension to the existing allotments?Cheers |
| 2 | 2017-05-16 17:44 | David Beaver ♦1 | Hi,Sorry for the confusion.It's a community garden on the council allotment site. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-16 17:45 | chillly | No problem, that helps, thanks. | |
| 48734629 by viking1263 @ 2017-05-16 15:11 | 1 | 2017-05-16 15:14 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Thanks for the detail. It is fine to include residential roads in residential landuse areas. Would have drawn a single residential around the whole block. HTH |
| 48704202 by Dominik Picheta @ 2017-05-15 15:03 | 1 | 2017-05-15 15:11 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThe road you added doesn't join up to anything, so routing to the road won't work. I suggest you join it to a point in Thomas Street if that is how it is accessed.If it supports residential properties then I would change the tag to highway=residental. Does the road have... |
| 2 | 2017-05-15 15:20 | Dominik Picheta ♦1 | Done http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48704526#map=15/54.4195/-6.4427 | |
| 3 | 2017-05-15 15:58 | Dominik Picheta ♦1 | Thanks for accepting!btw pointers on how to make "Flat 1, Mourneview House" (through to "Flat 29, Mourneview House") and "1 Mourneview House" (through to "29 Mourneview House") searchable would be appreciated. | |
| 4 | 2017-05-15 16:30 | chillly | I didn't accept your work - in OSM we try to use everything. :-)You can add a point for each address and add addressing for each one. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses for more info. | |
| 5 | 2017-05-15 17:49 | MCDA ♦112 | Amazingly that is not surprising, as Google Maps is very wrong in a lot of areas!I have traced the building more accurately from Bing and added some local features. | |
| 6 | 2017-05-15 17:57 | Dominik Picheta ♦1 | Nice! Beautiful job :)Thanks for the links chillly! | |
| 48704133 by jobserveqa @ 2017-05-15 14:59 | 1 | 2017-05-15 15:06 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThe carpark node you added duplicates the area already there. You added the name 'test' so It won't matter to you that I'm going to remove it.I hope you add some real stuff in the future. |
| 48700915 by Chris Skerratt @ 2017-05-15 12:54 | 1 | 2017-05-15 13:56 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIs the path you have entered a permanent route or a temporary one for an event? |
| 2 | 2017-05-15 14:11 | Chris Skerratt ♦1 | Its a Permanent Trail one, more sections will open up over the summer as they are built | |
| 3 | 2017-05-15 14:16 | chillly | Very good, thanks | |
| 48701713 by Chris Skerratt @ 2017-05-15 13:24 | 1 | 2017-05-15 14:03 | chillly | Hi,You have tagged the Walesbymoor Trail as a track. That means it is wide enough for a four-wheeled vehicle, yet you have tagged the width as 0.5m. I suggest you want to use highway=path instead. The extra (useful) tags makes it clear what to expect. You haven't added any access tags. Is i... |
| 48480780 by Dentyyyy @ 2017-05-07 17:33 | 1 | 2017-05-15 10:23 | chillly | Hi,If the designation is public bridleway, then I suggest the highway tag should be highway=bridleway too |
| 48677526 by Mithos1 @ 2017-05-14 16:17 | 1 | 2017-05-14 16:44 | chillly | I'm going to sound very picky, but a meadow in the UK is a very specific thing, with grass left to harvest for hay, allowing wild flowers to flourish then later, some animal grazing. This could be a meadow, or maybe grassland. |
| 2 | 2017-05-14 16:52 | Mithos1 ♦2 | Hi. I wasn't sure about this one. It's definitely not used to create hay, but the developers added and over time there is now significant amounts of different Flora and Fauna that grow and live here, so Grassland seemed too basic. However I can change it if you think that would be best? | |
| 3 | 2017-05-14 16:57 | chillly | I leave it to you (I don't know the area). If there's no hay some would say it's not a meadow, but grass with wild flowers would sway it for others. You could add a note (note=x) to explain your choice for the next mapper. Happy to help (If I have :-) ) | |
| 48676909 by Mithos1 @ 2017-05-14 15:54 | 1 | 2017-05-14 15:59 | chillly | Again, are you sure about the name? It is not unusual for things to not have a name. |
| 2 | 2017-05-14 16:13 | Mithos1 ♦2 | Thanks for the help Chilly. The residential on the estate call it that, but there are no official signs etc. Thanks | |
| 3 | 2017-05-14 16:40 | chillly | There is a 'local name' tag (loc_name=x) if that helps. | |
| 48676868 by stapes @ 2017-05-14 15:52 | 1 | 2017-05-14 16:00 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIt is very unusual to have an edit that spans the world. I would always break each edit up into much smaller locations.HTH |
| 2 | 2017-05-15 03:35 | Qwertii ♦18 | Maps.me doesn't let you split up edits as far as I can tell. It just uploads once you stop adding things for a bit. | |
| 48676833 by Mithos1 @ 2017-05-14 15:51 | 1 | 2017-05-14 15:58 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. We only use the name tag for names from a sign or a name board. We don't use it as a description (it's a common beginner's mistake). If it is a balancing pond we do have a separate tag for that (landuse=basin, basin=detention for example.... |
| 48651010 by sensationLIVE @ 2017-05-13 14:40 | 1 | 2017-05-13 14:48 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThis looks like some kind of experiment that you then saved. I think this is ready to be reverted, (undone). What do you think? |
| 48631834 by Ashenskyy @ 2017-05-12 18:43 | 1 | 2017-05-12 18:48 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have changed a wood to be a park. Are you sure? |
| 2 | 2017-05-12 20:37 | Ashenskyy ♦2 | Yes. Has grass areas, trees, swings, roundabout, slide and other children climbing frames. There for a park and not a wood in my opinion. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-12 20:39 | chillly | Thanks. | |
| 48630638 by Little Lilly @ 2017-05-12 17:56 | 1 | 2017-05-12 19:24 | chillly | Hi,Thanks for this detail, everything is useful. You have made a very common beginner's mistake. You have added a description as the name tag. We only ever use names in the name tag, usually from a name board or a sign. A phone box will not have a name and certainly not 'Phone box' ... |
| 48626202 by GPkps @ 2017-05-12 14:35 | 1 | 2017-05-12 15:14 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have converted a grassland to a park. When I look at the aerial imagery, including some new imagery, it shows as buildings. Are you sure that's a park?The new park you added extends out onto the surrounding roads. Are you sure that is right? |
| 48603717 by ILAldridge @ 2017-05-11 20:17 | 1 | 2017-05-11 20:45 | chillly | Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the detail. Drawing building outlines is better than just a point, though a point is better than nothing. I suggest you look at the tags on the point and transfer them to your new building outline and then delete the point. At the moment we have two objects in OSM for one ... |
| 48602480 by Sam Lewis @ 2017-05-11 19:28 | 1 | 2017-05-11 19:31 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the footpath. It would be best to join it at both ends to the road. That way routing software using OSM data will be able route pedestrians or bikes along your footpath |
| 48601378 by Dank Bison @ 2017-05-11 18:43 | 1 | 2017-05-11 18:55 | chillly | the pitch looks useful, but the tagging has a mistake. We use leisure=pitch, not landuse=pitch.HTH |
| 48601287 by Dank Bison @ 2017-05-11 18:39 | 1 | 2017-05-11 18:46 | chillly | Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the detail.You have added two areas but you haven't added a tag to say what the area is. The surface tags are good. I'm guessing the round one is a playground (leisure=playground) because it surrounds a point with that tag. If so I would add the tags to your ... |
| 48595503 by snorredenstora @ 2017-05-11 15:03 | 1 | 2017-05-11 15:13 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou can add an alternative name or local name as well as the official name. e.g. loc_name= The Dog |
| 48595419 by Tucker202 @ 2017-05-11 15:00 | 1 | 2017-05-11 15:11 | chillly | Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the details.I think I would have drawn the whole area as the park, not in two parts. You can still draw the footpath through the park.HTH |
| 48595461 by Tucker202 @ 2017-05-11 15:02 | 1 | 2017-05-11 15:09 | chillly | This needs an object type to describe it. Is it a monument perhaps? |
| 48594161 by NigelPilcher @ 2017-05-11 14:23 | 1 | 2017-05-11 14:55 | chillly | Rather than just a point I like to draw the area and then tag that as sport=tennis. Does the place have a name? name=x |
| 48594540 by NigelPilcher @ 2017-05-11 14:34 | 1 | 2017-05-11 14:54 | chillly | A barbers needs a shop tag so the software knows what kind of an object it is. shop=hairdresser, plus the name tag should do it. You can extras such ass address and phone number tags if you know that info too. |
| 48594685 by NigelPilcher @ 2017-05-11 14:39 | 1 | 2017-05-11 14:52 | chillly | The building=no tag (from a previous editor) might cause problems. I would describe this as each pitch for each sport (tennis still needs a pitch tag with a sport=tennis) I would possibly add the name to the building where people enter. |
| 48594867 by NigelPilcher @ 2017-05-11 14:44 | 1 | 2017-05-11 14:50 | chillly | You have added an area, over the top of an existing wood. There are no tags to dewcribe what it is, what did you have in mind here? |
| 48588649 by Haddo @ 2017-05-11 11:01 | 1 | 2017-05-11 11:07 | chillly | You have commented this a a park, yet you have changed coastline and water. Please make your edit comment relate to what you really edit. |
| 48588466 by Haddo @ 2017-05-11 10:56 | 1 | 2017-05-11 11:05 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a park over the top of an existing recreation ground. I will revert (undo) this edit. |
| 48587330 by sjm4 @ 2017-05-11 10:14 | 1 | 2017-05-11 10:25 | chillly | You have added a park point when the recreation ground is already mapped. I suspect you want a park with a name, but it looks like a the green space is a recreation ground. If you are sure about the name you could add it to the existing recreation ground and not double up with the point. |
| 48587297 by sjm4 @ 2017-05-11 10:13 | 1 | 2017-05-11 10:22 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a postbox in the middle of a road, it will actually be beside the road. It would be better that you move it to its real location. You have also included it into the boundary relation for Stourport-on-Severn. This is clearly not right. Do you need any help sorting this ... |
| 48574919 by Steven10 @ 2017-05-10 21:22 | 1 | 2017-05-10 21:31 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Is there a park in the middle of the roundabout? Is it really called 'Parque'? I suspect not. We welcome new editors, but new stuff must be real, in the right place and correctly described. I will revert (undo) this edit. |
| 48574905 by Billo007 @ 2017-05-10 21:22 | 1 | 2017-05-10 21:26 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThe stream you added looks a but small to be a stream - it might be, but it might also be a ditch. Very few streams flow into canals. The direction of your stream flows away from the canal - that would empty the canal into the nearby houses. The direction of the line needs to be reve... |
| 48572960 by Callum771 @ 2017-05-10 19:59 | 1 | 2017-05-10 21:12 | chillly | Junk - reverted |
| 48573180 by Map_mc_map @ 2017-05-10 20:08 | 1 | 2017-05-10 20:14 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. You have drawn the Memorial Park - I have intended to do for months. You have drawn it so it overlaps the building, that is not very accurate, either the building or the park (or both) need adjusting. If you have any questions please ask. |
| 48571433 by Matthew Chrysler Furness @ 2017-05-10 19:00 | 1 | 2017-05-10 20:10 | chillly | This looks like gardens to me. The space is enclosed by houses. I think this is imaginary. I suggest this is reverted (undo) to remove this park. |
| 48534689 by warangal @ 2017-05-09 15:08 | 1 | 2017-05-10 19:46 | SK53 ♦864 | This is one of a number of edits which seem to be large scale & should follow either or both the automated or mechanical edit policies (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct) Please try & reply promptly as to your reason for these edits. These edits are likely ... |
| 2 | 2017-05-10 20:05 | chillly | When an inexperienced mapper (52 edits is very, very inexperienced) makes wide-ranging mechanical edits like this it is usually reverted. Please don't make any more without discussion. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-11 03:39 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes. A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about | |
| 48572837 by leemanno @ 2017-05-10 19:54 | 1 | 2017-05-10 20:02 | chillly | Hi,Again I would only add a name tag if that name is displayed. I don't think this name is displayed. It is a common mistake to add a name as a description. We only ever use the name tag to add a documented name.HTH |
| 48572736 by leemanno @ 2017-05-10 19:49 | 1 | 2017-05-10 20:01 | chillly | Welcome to OSM, thanks for the detail.You've added a park and a name to another park. We add names that are displayed on the site, usually on a board or sign. Do these parks have names (not all do)?If they have a name we would capitalise names usually, e.g. Peel Street Park, not peel stre... |
| 48572628 by Elerdon @ 2017-05-10 19:45 | 1 | 2017-05-10 19:51 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Thanks for the detail. You've added footpaths and also added the sidewalk tag. Side walks are usually beside a road, yours look like linking footpaths. I would take the sidewalk tags off.HTH |
| 48572469 by ASDFJKLE @ 2017-05-10 19:39 | 1 | 2017-05-10 19:45 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.I see you have added a beach in a building. Really? I think this might be an experiment that you saved by mistake.I will revert (undo) this edit. If you have questions, feel free to ask |
| 48571926 by abcd123456789 @ 2017-05-10 19:17 | 1 | 2017-05-10 19:43 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. You have added a postbox, but it probably isn't in the middle of the road. I suggest you add the postbox where it really is. |
| 48571799 by FlamingEternity @ 2017-05-10 19:13 | 1 | 2017-05-10 19:19 | chillly | Welcome to OSM You have added a park over the top of buildings. This is plainly wrong. I will revert (undo) this edit. If you have any questions please feel free to ask |
| 48571612 by sworn @ 2017-05-10 19:06 | 1 | 2017-05-10 19:16 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a park over the top of buildings. This is plainly wrong. I will revert (undo) this edit. If you have any questions please feel free to ask |
| 48530397 by Rowland @ 2017-05-09 12:18 | 1 | 2017-05-10 13:19 | chillly | HI,Tidy after an import? Where was this import discussed? Are you aware of the guidelines? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 2 | 2017-05-10 16:28 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Looks like the school grounds are from OS OpenMap Local according to the source https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492338815 | |
| 3 | 2017-07-19 13:31 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | My personal experience of the various bits of OS OpenData (trees, water, buildings) is that "trees" were basically rubbish (there are probably some trees in the area, but you can get a much better idea of exactly where from Bing+survey), "water" was pretty good, if a few years ou... | |
| 48476043 by Barry86m @ 2017-05-07 14:04 | 1 | 2017-05-07 14:08 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Is Haven Gardens a single building? It looks like a square of buildings with a space in the middle to me. |
| 2 | 2017-05-07 14:13 | Barry86m ♦3 | Haven Gardens are separate buildings, but confusingly two-thirds of it (e.g. number 1-22) is accessed from Poplar Grove and the remaining third (e.g. 23-35) from Pond View. | |
| 48369156 by Mapmoo @ 2017-05-03 15:30 | 1 | 2017-05-07 09:41 | chillly | Thanks for the edit. Keeping up with changes is very useful.If an amenity closes it is best to change the tagging to reflect that. I would change the pub tag to be disused:amenity=pub. If the old name board is still present then I'd leave the name unchanged as it is still a landmark, but if... |
| 48461259 by mark255 @ 2017-05-06 20:28 | 1 | 2017-05-07 09:32 | chillly | Hi,You have added a couple of living streets in Pocklington. These are vanishingly rare in the UK and as far as I know the East Riding council have not created any. It is usual to just use highway=residential in the UK, with surface, sidewalk and maxspeed tags to add more detail.HTH |
| 48440240 by Dentyyyy @ 2017-05-05 22:33 | 1 | 2017-05-07 09:29 | chillly | Is there a way to get from St Peter's Walk onto the footpath? If so it is best if you join them. That way routing software can then create a continuous route using the OSM data.HTH |
| 48440171 by Dentyyyy @ 2017-05-05 22:29 | 1 | 2017-05-07 09:26 | chillly | Hi,Thanks for this edit. You have named the public footpath 'Public Footpath'. I doubt that is its name, it is the description. We only use the name tag to actually add a real name, such as Jakes Walk or Clevland Way. If it is a public footpath (signed on the ground as that) in the UK w... |
| 48432558 by JamesNewton @ 2017-05-05 17:07 | 1 | 2017-05-05 17:23 | chillly | Welcome to OSM. I can see that you are trying to add a "Development Site", though this is not complete. There was already a brownfield site show, Has this changed? Has construction started on this site? If so then rather than adding a new are, I would have changed the brownfield to a c... |
| 2 | 2017-05-06 14:23 | JamesNewton ♦1 | Hi there, yes i am very much a beginner. Trying to gather data on the layout and features of the area for my University coursework, in which the development site is completely theoretical for my project | |
| 3 | 2017-05-06 14:24 | JamesNewton ♦1 | was only trying to add in onto the map to gather information on its relationship with surrounding areaThanks | |
| 4 | 2017-05-06 14:26 | JamesNewton ♦1 | Need to include maps and some sort of spatial analysis of the site, therefore have been experimenting with different websites, as i don't have the time to learn GIS efficiently. | |
| 5 | 2017-05-06 14:28 | chillly | OK,If your edit is theoretical (or put another way: imaginary) it needs to be removed from OSM. We only want real objects in their correct location, correctly described. I will revert (undo) this edit. If you want to experiment with private overlays you might like http://umap.openstreetmap.fr | |
| 6 | 2017-05-06 14:30 | JamesNewton ♦1 | Yepp, will do that thanks for your help | |
| 48376076 by HElsey @ 2017-05-03 20:46 | 1 | 2017-05-03 21:12 | chillly | Welcome to OSM, thanks for the detail. You have added a road in the town as a track. It might be more usual to call it a service road (highway=service rather than highway=track). In OSM terms that can be an alley or a ginnel. You can add the surface as you have to show it is unpaved. You can furthe... |
| 2 | 2017-05-03 21:26 | HElsey ♦1 | Thanks Chilly - this is my first go at mapping, so this is really helpful. I'll see if I can edit it. Its a residential unmade road, so it didn't seem right to call it a 'service' road. Is there a definitions page somewhere on OSM? I'll try to get rid of the lanes tag... tha... | |
| 48373760 by eco-steamclean @ 2017-05-03 19:02 | 1 | 2017-05-03 19:27 | chillly | Welcome to OSM. You have added some useful stuff but you haven't added a tag to say what is there. Is this an office, or a residential property or what? What kind of business is this? The postcode would be better if it was spaced 'L22 3XN'. OSM is not a business directory, so the desc... |
| 48174102 by Tom Crouch @ 2017-04-26 20:10 | 1 | 2017-04-26 20:24 | chillly | Welcome to OSM, thanks for the detail.Is the Claremont Medical Centre a hospital or a GP practice? If it is a GP practice it should be tagged as amenity=doctors, rather than hospital.This was added, as a point, many years ago. You have now improved it by drawing the building. However the fac... |
| 48163707 by Kate Bellamy @ 2017-04-26 13:38 | 1 | 2017-04-26 13:59 | chillly | Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the edits.It is a common beginner's mistake to misuse the name tag. On a road we would only ever put the name of the road in the name tag, you have put the name, the location and the postcode. Postcodes get added to buildings or sometimes building entrances because ... |
| 48142592 by Stewart7 @ 2017-04-25 21:19 | 1 | 2017-04-25 21:26 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. We would tag a post office with a specific tag (amenity = post_office). The name would then be the name displayed on a board or sign, (e.g. West Wickham Postoffice perhaps). The fact that it is inside a shop is shown by drawing and tagging the shop building and... |
| 48101874 by DannyAiquipa @ 2017-04-24 20:05 | 1 | 2017-04-25 12:43 | chillly | Why did you delete the pond? There is a pond there, not quite where the new mapper put it, but that's a newbie mistake. Does it really deserve to be deleted? I think this is heavy-handed |
| 2 | 2017-04-25 14:08 | DannyAiquipa ♦100 | Hi Chilly, I deleted this pond based on Satellite imagery, because it does not show clearly, but I will revert my changeset if this is convenient for you. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-25 14:10 | DannyAiquipa ♦100 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48126491 | |
| 48101884 by Skeletorian @ 2017-04-24 20:06 | 1 | 2017-04-24 20:14 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for checking the bus stop. It was imported into OSM from an open data source called NaPTAN. This certainly has some errors, so it is good to see someone checking. One thing you might like to change is that when you are happy with the tags, change the naptan:verified = no to ye... |
| 48097883 by Jamesyd @ 2017-04-24 17:30 | 1 | 2017-04-24 17:45 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail.Is this a park, or perhaps a garden, especially given it's name. We have a tag for a garden (leisure = garden).HTH |
| 48096311 by jamesnash @ 2017-04-24 16:24 | 1 | 2017-04-24 17:08 | chillly | You have made a common mistake that beginners often make. You have used the name tag to describe something. We use the name tag to hold the name shown on a board or a sign. If there is no specific name then we leave the name tag blank. A refuelling area could be marked as a fuel station. If it i... |
| 48096170 by jamesnash @ 2017-04-24 16:19 | 1 | 2017-04-24 17:05 | chillly | Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the detail.You have added an area with a name and a description, but that's not quite enough to specify the feature in OSM. A garden centre is tagged as shop=garden_centre. Without this the map won't know how to show te feature properly.HTH |
| 48072094 by James Ducky Wildgoose @ 2017-04-23 21:03 | 1 | 2017-04-23 21:21 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. Looking at the aerial images it looks as though you have outlined more than just the building, yet you have tagged it as a building. The surroundings might be a garden, there's a tag for that. The postcode is very useful for navigation when OSM data ge... |
| 48067067 by Alistair Gammond @ 2017-04-23 17:36 | 1 | 2017-04-23 18:24 | chillly | Welcome to OSM, thanks for the detail.We normally don't add footpaths beside roads, such as Whittaker Road, we would add sidewalk tags to the road instead. In that case the path looks sufficiently separated that I might just add the footpath separately. I would always use highway=footway ra... |
| 48065224 by Alice La Barbera @ 2017-04-23 16:27 | 1 | 2017-04-23 16:43 | chillly | Thank you |
| 48063509 by Alice La Barbera @ 2017-04-23 15:24 | 1 | 2017-04-23 16:09 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the details.You have made a common beginner's mistake and used the name tag to describe the feature. I doubt that the park is called 'Park' and the playground probably isn't called 'Playground' If there is no name board or sign just leave ... |
| 48037634 by rick p b @ 2017-04-22 16:13 | 1 | 2017-04-22 16:43 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. You have taken the building tag off the 'zoo' area. I'm not sure it's a zoo - it seems too small, but I haven't visited. Is it really called 'Mini Zoo'? A common mistake that beginners make is to use the name tag to hold a d... |
| 2 | 2017-04-22 17:13 | rick p b ♦1 | It's not exactly a zoo no, but I didn't know what else to tag it as, it's got a small aquarium inside, small aviary and also houses some smaller mammals such as rabbits. Thanks for the naming note I will bare that in mind for future reference. | |
| 47999113 by Wes28 @ 2017-04-21 10:54 | 1 | 2017-04-21 11:28 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detailI think the name tag may be more of a description than a name. It is a common beginner's mistake to put too much into the name tag. We add the name that the place has on a name board or sign. If there's no such name we leave the name tag blank.HTH |
| 47998974 by JLGoodenough @ 2017-04-21 10:47 | 1 | 2017-04-21 11:21 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detailYou have used the name tag to mark the species or genus of the tree. We only use the name tag to refer to a name given to that object, on trees a name would be very, very rare. Misunderstanding the use of name tags is a common beginner's mistake.There are... |
| 47940073 by DanBooth1996 @ 2017-04-19 13:54 | 1 | 2017-04-19 14:05 | chillly | You seem to have created a multipolygon. This is usually used to create a multilayered object such as a pond with an island in it. Here it is not needed and is not complete. I wonder if you were practicing with the editor and saved you test work. Would you like me to revert (undo) your edit? |
| 47936732 by DanBooth1996 @ 2017-04-19 12:13 | 1 | 2017-04-19 13:53 | chillly | SImilarly, I doubt the name of the path is Perton Feilds Walk Paths [sic]. If the path has no name on the ground, please leave the name tag blank. |
| 2 | 2017-04-19 13:57 | DanBooth1996 ♦1 | Thank you for this information, I will keep it noted for future changes | |
| 47936719 by DanBooth1996 @ 2017-04-19 12:13 | 1 | 2017-04-19 13:52 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail.You have made a common beginner's error and added a description of the item as the name. I doubt the path is named 'Penk Rise Paths'. If there is no name please leave the name tag empty - most paths have no name. It is clear from its location th... |
| 47938489 by CJsWorld @ 2017-04-19 13:05 | 1 | 2017-04-19 13:46 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI think you have got in a bit of a muddle here. You have added a park tag to woodland, yet the underlying park encompasses the woodland. You have then added anothe rpark over the top of the whole thing. I think this edit should be reverted (undone) to get back the stable positi... |
| 47853718 by Pyorot @ 2017-04-17 02:58 | 1 | 2017-04-17 12:12 | chillly | This is a controversial mass edit by a recently-joined editor. I think this needs to be discussed before such a change. I suggest this is reverted.Why have you made such a change? (Please reply - we need to understand what you are doing) |
| 2 | 2017-04-17 12:13 | Derick Rethans ♦156 | Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see you're a new mapper (5 edits), and you've decided to change town/suburb classfications around London. This is a controversial move, and should have been discussed on the talk-gb and talk-gb-london mailinglist first.cheers,Derick | |
| 3 | 2017-04-17 12:28 | SK53 ♦864 | Revision of place tags on London suburbs MUST be discussed beforehand. The current values represent a consensus of mappers and users over the past 12+ years. I have reverted this and your 4 similar changesets. | |
| 4 | 2017-04-17 23:19 | Pyorot ♦1 | Hi, thanks for describing your policy.I made the changes in order to make the map work with OSM's Nominatim service. This is an API that takes coordinates as input and returns addresses. Suburbs of London labelled as towns *do not get returned* by Nominatim, presumably because it trumps the... | |
| 5 | 2017-04-18 09:37 | SK53 ♦864 | Thank you. I know perfectly well what Nominatim is: the current maintainer is a friend.For this sort of issue you should be filing issues on the Nominatim github pages https://github.com/openstreetmap/Nominatim/issues. I suspect that the issue is known, but we have too few developers and maintai... | |
| 6 | 2017-04-18 14:45 | Pyorot ♦1 | I deduced based on the fact that Nominatim doesn't return town info in London and based on the usage info given here (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsuburb ; http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dtown) that suburbs in Greater London should be tagged "suburb" a... | |
| 7 | 2017-04-18 14:49 | Pyorot ♦1 | Actually, sorry, I forgot to mention that part of the reason I'm put off from engaging in discussions is that your note gives an example of such a discussion that took over a year to close. | |
| 8 | 2017-04-18 16:41 | SK53 ♦864 | We do have an important principle in OSM: respect for fellow contributors. You are distinctly failing to show that respect to me or others. Quite frankly I think we are better off without your arrogant attitude and unwillingness to collaborate.The reason why the note has not been cleared is that... | |
| 9 | 2017-04-18 19:54 | Pyorot ♦1 | You think it's arrogant to not engage in a discussion? Do you have infinite time? Or did you take my characterisation of the state of suburbs as "idleness" personally?Either way, your accusation of disrespect and arrogance, bundled with the mischaracterisation of my opinion, use o... | |
| 47844322 by Tayside Mapper @ 2017-04-16 17:44 | 1 | 2017-04-16 18:18 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detailsYou have changed a recreation ground into a park. The name (Fairmuir Park) hints at a park, but in OSM terms a green space which is mostly laid out a s sports pitched is a recreation ground (landuse-recreation_ground).HTH |
| 47843099 by Andy1956 @ 2017-04-16 16:54 | 1 | 2017-04-16 17:00 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail.We don't add address details to highways, except the name of course. We add address details to buildings or sometimes entrances.Highway=crossing is used to show where a footway crosses a road, not for the whole road length.HTH |
| 47811865 by MasterThomasG @ 2017-04-15 12:03 | 1 | 2017-04-15 12:16 | chillly | Doggetts Park looks like a recreation ground to me. |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 16:24 | MasterThomasG ♦2 | Going there often it's got a small park and isn't often used for football and other activities it's just a large area with trees. Any ideas?😀 | |
| 3 | 2017-04-16 16:24 | MasterThomasG ♦2 | (Small playground that is) | |
| 4 | 2017-04-16 16:27 | chillly | I would draw an area that outlines the playground. We have a tag, leisure=playground to mark that too. By being separate you can add it's own tags, e.g. name. | |
| 5 | 2017-04-16 16:31 | MasterThomasG ♦2 | On my phone rn I'll sort it out when I get back to my pc 😀. I added that part as a park prior need to go there at some point to see if it has a specific name😀 | |
| 47811048 by MasterThomasG @ 2017-04-15 11:23 | 1 | 2017-04-15 12:13 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail.I would expect that a green space given mostly to sports pitches would be a recreation ground not a park. What do you think? |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 16:16 | MasterThomasG ♦2 | This area is called Warner's Bridge park, like the name suggests it's a park granted living close it may seem's it's also a recreational ground but it's called a park so I added it as a park. Thanks for the comment hope for a reply.😀 | |
| 3 | 2017-04-16 16:20 | chillly | In OSM terms any green space that is mostly laid out with sports pitches is a recreation ground. It is a fine line. The name suggests the ambiguity. Looking again I would make it a rec, but it's not my local area. | |
| 4 | 2017-04-16 16:22 | MasterThomasG ♦2 | I see where your coming from, So OK I'll change it to a recreational area asap.😀 | |
| 47840984 by lllliiiiiiiiiiii @ 2017-04-16 15:27 | 1 | 2017-04-16 15:37 | chillly | Welcome to OSM Fairfield Recreation Ground is not a park it is a recreation ground - the clue is in the name. I have removed the extra park you added and altered the existing rec's name |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 15:38 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Reverted duplicattion | |
| 47839564 by descender001 @ 2017-04-16 14:27 | 1 | 2017-04-16 15:19 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added two parks that from the aerial imagery look anything but a park. Are you sure this is right? |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 21:00 | descender001 ♦1 | Hello.I've adapted this to grassland as didn't mean to tag as park. This is an area of grassland which used to be a construction site (2-3 years ago) which is showing on the aerial images as parking etc. | |
| 47837389 by Wolfbarbecue @ 2017-04-16 12:39 | 1 | 2017-04-16 12:43 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detailYou have tagged the area as both a park and a playground. It is one or the other. The whole area might be a park and a smaller area inside that be the playgroundHTH |
| 47836748 by It's Matthew @ 2017-04-16 12:04 | 1 | 2017-04-16 12:11 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail.You have made a very common, beginners mistake by using the name tag to describe the item. I doubt the footpath is called 'Public Footpath'. If things don't have a name (paths often don't) then we leave the name blank. If you want to mark t... |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 12:16 | It's Matthew ♦2 | I just tried to update it... I think it should be correct now? | |
| 3 | 2017-04-16 12:17 | It's Matthew ♦2 | There is a load more paths round this area linking to the different villages. I walked for 3 or so hours on them yesterday yet can't exactly remember which way I went other than what I have just added. I'm going to walk them again soon and attempt to edit them on my phone as I go :) | |
| 4 | 2017-04-16 12:19 | chillly | Not quite, you took the highway tag and the surface tag off. Highway tag says what it is (not just a line) and the surface tag is very useful for walkers etc. It doesn't show on the standard render but there are many other renders that do, including personal ones that people use to load into ha... | |
| 47818445 by Helenharvey @ 2017-04-15 16:25 | 1 | 2017-04-15 17:47 | chillly | Hi,You seem to have turned part of Cranmore Drive into a bridge. Did you mean that? Do you need some help to sort this out? |
| 47789963 by matthew785766 @ 2017-04-14 18:33 | 1 | 2017-04-15 09:44 | chillly | This does not look like a park, it is just farmland. Please stop adding imaginary stuff to OSM |
| 47796497 by Sniperboy111 @ 2017-04-14 21:22 | 1 | 2017-04-14 22:12 | chillly | welcome to OSMYou first two edits are clearly doodles. I will revert (undo) them. We welcome new stuff from new mappers, but it must be real, in the right place and correctly described. |
| 47789342 by AbrasivePigeon @ 2017-04-14 18:09 | 1 | 2017-04-14 19:04 | chillly | The wood looks good, but it has a hole in it. We create that by creating a relation known as a multipolygon relation. If you create an outline for the hole then select the wood and the hole and merge them (from the menu when they are both selected) that will create the MP relation. You can then tag ... |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 19:18 | AbrasivePigeon ♦2 | Done, thanks for the tips! | |
| 47790231 by xhxllyx @ 2017-04-14 18:44 | 1 | 2017-04-14 18:49 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a playground and named it as 'Childrens Playground - Recently built' This is a common beginner's mistake, using the name tag to describe the site. If the place doesn't have a name, or you don't know it, please leave it blank. |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 19:08 | xhxllyx ♦1 | Ok thanks | |
| 47789872 by matthew785766 @ 2017-04-14 18:30 | 1 | 2017-04-14 18:34 | chillly | You have added a point but it needs tags to describe what it is, a name is not enough. If it is a wall you need barrier=wall. Names usually have initial letters in capitals, especially old names. |
| 47789804 by matthew785766 @ 2017-04-14 18:28 | 1 | 2017-04-14 18:30 | JamesKingdom ♦98 | Is there really a park there? It looks just like houses to me. |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 18:30 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThe park looks to be imaginary. There are houses there. I will revert (undo) this edit. | |
| 47788107 by Silverhaze442 @ 2017-04-14 17:23 | 1 | 2017-04-14 17:33 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIs the park really called Green Place? There is a temptation to describe things using the name tag, but we only ever use the real name for things. I know that Pokemon players think that parks need a name to help with the game, but we only want real names. :-) |
| 47788236 by AbrasivePigeon @ 2017-04-14 17:27 | 1 | 2017-04-14 17:30 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. I would suggest that Victory Fields is a recreation ground, not a park. It looks to be predominantly for sports. |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 19:00 | AbrasivePigeon ♦2 | Yep you're absolutely right, my bad. Changed and also added more detail (skate park and playground). | |
| 47783006 by NM1305 @ 2017-04-14 14:54 | 1 | 2017-04-14 15:06 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Hi, welcome to OSM.I have disconnected the park boundary from the centreline of the road and also converted the parts to a multipolygon. |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 15:08 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detailWhen you are adding an area please don't join it up to a road. The line that marks the road is the centreline so there will always be a gap. | |
| 47780920 by Starbukc @ 2017-04-14 13:51 | 1 | 2017-04-14 13:56 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a park over the top of all the existing stuff. This is clearly a doodle and I will revert (undo) it. |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 13:57 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Duplicate reverted | |
| 47755942 by Regon123 @ 2017-04-13 20:19 | 1 | 2017-04-13 20:28 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. May the Pokémon be with you! |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 12:58 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | But it's a recreation ground not a park! | |
| 3 | 2017-04-14 12:59 | chillly | It doesn't look like a rec. There's no sports pitches laid out on it. | |
| 4 | 2017-04-14 13:37 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi, it's an area for informal recreation on foot, there do not have to be pitches. | |
| 5 | 2017-04-14 13:54 | chillly | No, in English it is a piece of public land used for sports and games. The tagged space is a piece of rough ground that could not support sports and games. That may be a park, I suspect it is just grassland, it's certainly doesn't look well kept for a park. | |
| 47779608 by Jordan Steeles-Turner @ 2017-04-14 13:06 | 1 | 2017-04-14 13:08 | chillly | You have added the building of church, but you have not matched the actual building, you may have matched the area around the church, but that's not the building which is what you have tagged. How do you want to sort this out? |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 13:16 | Jordan Steeles-Turner ♦1 | I suppose making the area slightly smaller to fit around the building would work. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-14 13:18 | chillly | Yes, that would be good. Try to match the footprint, the aerial images are often slanted from the camera angle. Churches (not rectangular and not an even height) can be awkward | |
| 47779461 by Jordan Steeles-Turner @ 2017-04-14 13:00 | 1 | 2017-04-14 13:06 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the edit, but you need to describe the object you have added - a name is not enough. I suggest amenity=fast_food |
| 47779231 by Amarise @ 2017-04-14 12:51 | 1 | 2017-04-14 13:04 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a park over the top of the existing one. I will delete the unnamed one |
| 47779137 by ojktyler @ 2017-04-14 12:47 | 1 | 2017-04-14 12:53 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI think the point you deleted for a playground was right. You have added a small area and described it as a recreation ground. A recreation ground is a large area mainly marked out with sports pitches. What you have tagged as a rec looks like a playground. I know the tagging in O... |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 13:31 | ojktyler ♦1 | Thank you for the heads up chillly, have changed it back to a playground. | |
| 47777638 by toiletduck1234 @ 2017-04-14 11:45 | 1 | 2017-04-14 12:08 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detailYou have made a common beginner's mistake of adding a name that is really a description. The footpath is very unlikely to be called 'Path'. If it doesn't have a name (say on a name board) just leave the name blank. |
| 47777739 by toiletduck1234 @ 2017-04-14 11:49 | 1 | 2017-04-14 12:05 | chillly | Hi,You have added a park over the top of existing stuff. This is clearly wrong. If something has changed you should change the objects not add something else over the top. I will remove the new park |
| 47773668 by Connorhoggard @ 2017-04-14 09:24 | 1 | 2017-04-14 10:15 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to be keen to describe recreation grounds (mostly laid out a sports pitches) as parks and give them names. I'm guessing this is to attract Pokémon. New mappers are welcome, but the stuff you add or change must be real, in the right place and correctly described... |
| 47774052 by Daydreamcast @ 2017-04-14 09:33 | 1 | 2017-04-14 10:10 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. You have made a common beginner's mistake and used the name tag to describe the park rather than specify its name. If it doesn't have a name leave the name blank.Feel free to ask any questions |
| 47774904 by PaulMarnie @ 2017-04-14 09:57 | 1 | 2017-04-14 10:07 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou edit looks really useful. Most beginners make a few mistakes and you have too :-) You have overlaid a park and a playground. It can't be both. There may be a playground in a park in which case the playground would be smaller and probably inside the park.Adding building... |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 10:24 | PaulMarnie ♦1 | Thanks for the heads up; I'll keep those in mind on my next edit. Thanks again :) | |
| 47773314 by AWESOMECON10 @ 2017-04-14 09:17 | 1 | 2017-04-14 09:23 | chillly | Welcome to OSMFootpaths are always useful, thanks. |
| 47756734 by nanothewolf @ 2017-04-13 20:46 | 1 | 2017-04-13 20:50 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI know you didn;t create the park, but I would separate the cemetery from th epark and draw them separately.If you need help, please ask.HTH |
| 47756692 by themystic @ 2017-04-13 20:45 | 1 | 2017-04-13 20:49 | chillly | Thanks for the detail. You have used the name is a way that we try to avoid. The name tag is used to describe the name. 'No ball games' may be on a sign, but I doubt it is the name of a park. Not everything has to have a name. |
| 47756578 by themystic @ 2017-04-13 20:41 | 1 | 2017-04-13 20:47 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a park over the top of an existing park. If you were trying to add the name, please add it to the existing park. I will revert (undo) your edit. |
| 47756538 by UNit_Five5 @ 2017-04-13 20:40 | 1 | 2017-04-13 20:43 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIt looks like you might have been doodling and saved your doodle. There is no park there. I will revert (undo) your edit. |
| 47756322 by Salih D Mark Ince @ 2017-04-13 20:31 | 1 | 2017-04-13 20:34 | JamesKingdom ♦98 | Hi, please can you confirm the position of this canal. |
| 2 | 2017-04-13 20:39 | chillly | This is a doodle, I will revert (undo) it. Please be more careful with what you edit. | |
| 47756225 by Salih D Mark Ince @ 2017-04-13 20:28 | 1 | 2017-04-13 20:37 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIt looks like you were experimenting and saved your experiment. I will revert (undo) your edit. |
| 47755733 by Ctill97 @ 2017-04-13 20:12 | 1 | 2017-04-13 20:17 | chillly | reverted |
| 47755653 by Ctill97 @ 2017-04-13 20:09 | 1 | 2017-04-13 20:13 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a park over the top of an existing park. If you wanted to name the park, you could have added the name to the existing park. I will revert (undo) your edit and move the name to the existing park. |
| 47755358 by FrancisGG @ 2017-04-13 20:00 | 1 | 2017-04-13 20:05 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a park over the top of a building I will revert (undo) this edit. |
| 47754017 by TvNerd @ 2017-04-13 19:22 | 1 | 2017-04-13 20:02 | chillly | You have changed a recreation ground to be a park. It is clearly a recreation ground, it is even in the name. Not everything that is green is a park. I will revert this. |
| 47754884 by TvNerd @ 2017-04-13 19:46 | 1 | 2017-04-13 19:55 | chillly | reverted |
| 47754204 by ccstorm @ 2017-04-13 19:28 | 1 | 2017-04-13 19:47 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detailIt's best it don't join areas, like parks, to roads. The road line marks the centre line of the road, so there should always be a gap.HTH |
| 47754145 by TheFakeRibombee @ 2017-04-13 19:26 | 1 | 2017-04-13 19:34 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem so keen to add a park, you have added one over the top of a school building. Is this right? Do you need any help to sort this out? |
| 47753533 by Eye eye Captian @ 2017-04-13 19:10 | 1 | 2017-04-13 19:31 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail.If something is a tennis court, it is not a park. We use leisure=pitch, sport=tennis for that. |
| 47753294 by Nishaan Khoosal @ 2017-04-13 19:05 | 1 | 2017-04-13 19:24 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a park over the top of an existing park. Your park has a name, but you could have just added the name to the existing park. I will remove your park and add the name to the original park. |
| 47752908 by scud69 @ 2017-04-13 18:56 | 1 | 2017-04-13 19:22 | chillly | Once again, these are probably not named as 'Public Open Space' on a name board. Only use the name tag if there really is a name. You can define the access with access tags, e.g. access=public |
| 47752664 by scud69 @ 2017-04-13 18:49 | 1 | 2017-04-13 19:21 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. You have made a common beginner mistake of using the name tag to describe something. The footway probably doesn't have a name board with 'Footpath' on it. Thinks don't have to have a name. |
| 47751918 by SJH87 @ 2017-04-13 18:30 | 1 | 2017-04-13 19:18 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detailAre there really two parks there, or is there just one? |
| 2 | 2017-04-13 19:59 | SJH87 ♦1 | Just one! I'm getting used to using it lol | |
| 3 | 2017-04-13 21:34 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Clearly they're not parks, but gardens instead - so I've removed them. | |
| 47743114 by thomasm2014 @ 2017-04-13 13:32 | 1 | 2017-04-13 14:01 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI'm not sure what you are trying to do here. Why is there a link between the house on Ramsey Road to the paper on transfer western blot? Was this an experiment that you saved witjout meaning to? Do you need any help sorting this out? |
| 2 | 2017-04-13 15:30 | SK53 ♦864 | Much as I love Western Blots this has nothing whatsoever to do with OSM. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-13 17:15 | chillly | reverted | |
| 47743627 by stujames @ 2017-04-13 13:50 | 1 | 2017-04-13 14:03 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detailYou seem to be a bit tangled in relations that you really don't need. Do you need any help sorting this out? |
| 2 | 2017-04-13 14:07 | stujames ♦1 | Hi, how do you mean tangled? We can lose the point if it's overkill. I'm just trying to get my block onto as many maps as possible as it isn't showing up in various databases. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-13 14:12 | chillly | I commented on the wrong changeset, but taking the four together: The last one looks fine, the first and third use a relation to draw two parts of the building that is not needed to be a relation. The building outline could be drawn in one piece then the names, address details etc added to the outli... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-13 14:13 | chillly | sorry, *without* the separate point | |
| 5 | 2017-04-13 15:04 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hello sorry if I've blundered in. I corrected Dixie Court from the first changeset before seeing these comments. Regards Bernard | |
| 47708639 by Martin Wynne @ 2017-04-12 20:54 | 1 | 2017-04-12 21:26 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail.You have added a large area and described it as a building (building=yes). I suggest you remove the building tag.You have also added mad_made=works. This is for a non descript factory. Based on your comment I think I would tag this as landuse=brownfiel... |
| 2 | 2017-04-12 22:35 | Martin Wynne ♦15 | Thanks for your comments. I'm new to this. The site is not strictly unused/brownfield, there is some minor industrial activity in the old buildings. A planning application to convert it to a caravan park has recently been refused. | |
| 47698722 by douglasinlondon @ 2017-04-12 15:38 | 1 | 2017-04-12 16:44 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have drawn the building to match the aerial imagery, but that is skewed by parallax. The best solution is to trace around the top of the building and then drag it to the base (we draw building footprints on the ground usually). That is what the previous mapper looks to have don... |
| 47696704 by RonC47 @ 2017-04-12 14:42 | 1 | 2017-04-12 16:41 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail.You have made a common mistake and used the name tag to describe something rather than add it's name. Not all tracks have a name, so it's fine to leave it blank but it is very unlikely to be called 'Kelburn windfarm to Dalry Winfarm link... |
| 2 | 2017-04-12 21:50 | RonC47 ♦1 | Thanks for the comment. I am new to this. I will try to delete the name | |
| 47616665 by TJS @ 2017-04-10 09:41 | 1 | 2017-04-11 16:13 | chillly | It would be helpful to othe rmappers if you would please add a short comment to each upload to summarise what the edit is for. |
| 2 | 2017-04-12 14:01 | TJS ♦4 | did you miss the note tag? e.g. Note : road damaged in 2013 | |
| 3 | 2017-04-12 14:05 | chillly | No, but I had to open the changeset and look at the individual change to see that. If you had followed the recommended way of adding a comment to summarise the change to each upload I could have just looked at that without opening everything. That's why comments are on changeset are suggested. ... | |
| 47663713 by Styleguru @ 2017-04-11 17:02 | 1 | 2017-04-11 17:09 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou edit seems to have gone rather wrong. You have changed the building called Jessel House into a large circle. I will revert (undo) your edit. It looks like the only thing to change is the geometry of the building. |
| 47639725 by karitotp @ 2017-04-10 21:42 | 1 | 2017-04-11 16:53 | chillly | Hi,You have deleted a 'network capture area'. Do you know what a network capture area is? There are others, why did you delete this one? I want to know if the other are useful or not. |
| 2 | 2017-04-13 22:31 | karitotp ♦123 | Hi Chillly,I dont know exactly what is this one, also I deleted it because the area does not match with the satellite imagery.I saw that other edits have also been flagged by community - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47639516 | |
| 47563417 by p3et @ 2017-04-08 09:53 | 1 | 2017-04-11 16:10 | chillly | The UK Motorhomes website is copyright - it says so on the home page. You cannot use copyright sources without written permission that is compatible with the OSM licence. Do you have that? If not this edit will have to be deleted. We MUST be super careful about the sources we use. Please reply. |
| 47636393 by Yoshi8183 @ 2017-04-10 19:36 | 1 | 2017-04-10 19:50 | chillly | If this is a postbox, you need to simply add amenity = postbox. |
| 47636356 by Yoshi8183 @ 2017-04-10 19:34 | 1 | 2017-04-10 19:49 | chillly | You seem to have tried to outline the area of a hospital. That is a better way to describe it than the single existing point. However, your outline is very, very rough. You have included fields and what looks like a farm. Your idea is good, but you need to be much more accurate in outlining objects.... |
| 47636311 by Yoshi8183 @ 2017-04-10 19:33 | 1 | 2017-04-10 19:47 | chillly | You have added an area, but not tagged it as anything. What are you trying to describe here? |
| 47636262 by Yoshi8183 @ 2017-04-10 19:31 | 1 | 2017-04-10 19:44 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have rather messed up the recreation ground and added a park over the top of it. It looks to me that recreation ground would be the best choice and that it really isn't a park. To fix the mess, I suggest that this edit is reverted (undone). Would you like me to so... |
| 47600040 by Dextura Salisbury @ 2017-04-09 18:04 | 1 | 2017-04-09 18:15 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail.You have added a point with a name, but to be a bit more useful you need to add a tag to describe what it is. I'm guessing a shop (tagged as shop=yes) would be fine |
| 47519666 by BeckyLBillings @ 2017-04-06 20:01 | 1 | 2017-04-07 11:36 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. Your park tagging is a bit confused. You have added conflicting tags to a single area. If there is a park tag that. If there is some woods too draw another area (maybe inside the park) and tag that as woods, and so on. Natural tree is for a single tree, not a... |
| 2 | 2017-04-07 17:20 | BeckyLBillings ♦1 | I apologises for any mistakes I have made. going to get rid of some things. is there anything I can watch that would help? the tutorial is not that bad but it doesn't exactly go into detail. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-07 17:32 | chillly | Don't apologise, OSM can be tricky to understand at first. It's a long time since I started, so I'm not sure what there is for beginners. Have a go, mistakes can be corrected. Don't be afraid of changing your own work. If it all goes really badly I will remove your stuff for ... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-07 17:48 | chillly | I have had http://learnosm.org/en/ recommended to me for beginners.Hope that helps. | |
| 47541555 by Torpedoloss @ 2017-04-07 14:28 | 1 | 2017-04-07 15:05 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detailYou have added a hotel, with what looks like an English name, but you have tagged the name as the name in spanish (name:es rather than name) It means the name will not appear unless the tag is changed.HTH |
| 47541465 by CartoConsult @ 2017-04-07 14:26 | 1 | 2017-04-07 15:03 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the extra detail.You have drawn around the outline of a building. It is more usual to tag it as a building (building=yes). The area is already a commercial landuse, so your newly drawn building won't show up very well as it standsHTH |
| 47541418 by NekoGrace @ 2017-04-07 14:24 | 1 | 2017-04-07 14:26 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou don't need to add oneway=no, that is the default. You only need to add the oneway tag if it is 'yes' for a one way street. |
| 47534909 by BeckyLBillings @ 2017-04-07 10:24 | 1 | 2017-04-07 11:41 | chillly | You have added an area and tagged it as a place of worship. That should only be the building. If the area around is a grave yard there is a tag for that. The address details etc all belong on the building. |
| 47535213 by BeckyLBillings @ 2017-04-07 10:36 | 1 | 2017-04-07 11:38 | chillly | We usually don't add footways besides roads, we usually add sidewalk tags to the road. You have also added highway=crossing to a section of footway parallel to the road. Highway crossing is used on a point or short section of path where it crosses a road, such as a pedestrian crossing. |
| 47514380 by wir3d123 @ 2017-04-06 17:03 | 1 | 2017-04-06 17:06 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have placed a park on top of an existing recreation ground. Not everything that is green is a park. How would you like to sort this out? |
| 2 | 2017-04-06 17:20 | wir3d123 ♦2 | Seen as though a park is literally defined as an area of land used for recreation i am a little confused as why you felt the need to attempt to belittle me? If you could actually tell me a definition of a park that exclusively rejects the fact that they are areas of public land that are for recreati... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-06 17:29 | chillly | reverted | |
| 47510243 by And Albert Fair Trading Ltd @ 2017-04-06 14:51 | 1 | 2017-04-06 15:09 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have placed a point right over the top of a cafe (Cafe Nero) . Has this business replaced Cafe Nero? Is it sharing the building? The point you have added doesn't describe what it is. You have given lots of details, but no shop tag or office tag to describe what category ... |
| 2 | 2017-04-06 15:17 | And Albert Fair Trading Ltd ♦1 | How do we make the point SHOP? This isn't clear at all. We are actually a shop on the upper tier of Chester's Rows ABOVE cafe Nero. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-06 15:22 | chillly | I have added shop=yes tag. If there is a better shop description you can change it later. Now it has a shop tag it is easier to change it. Adding a shop above another is a problem. I suggest staggering the two points a little, maybe to reflect the relative entrances to the two premises. If your ... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-06 15:44 | And Albert Fair Trading Ltd ♦1 | OK, Thank you.I find this site awfully confusing to navigate and add the correct information. Well as long as people can find us that's all we want really. Thank s again | |
| 5 | 2017-04-06 15:46 | And Albert Fair Trading Ltd ♦1 | I can't see the tag point to change it? | |
| 6 | 2017-04-06 16:13 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Hi, also spotted that you have used=ele=1, that means 1m above sealevel. The correct tag is layer=1, as already used on Eastgate Street North. | |
| 47480758 by Mihai Turceanu @ 2017-04-05 15:53 | 1 | 2017-04-05 17:21 | chillly | More buildings with a description in the name tag. Please don't abuse the name tag |
| 47479793 by Mihai Turceanu @ 2017-04-05 15:20 | 1 | 2017-04-05 17:04 | chillly | Hi,You have used the name tag to describe buildings. This is not how it is used. Please only use names in the name tag. Names usually come from a name board at the site. 'Flates' is a wrong spelling of flats.The building you have named as 'Student Home' also is an invalid p... |
| 47451235 by Iwona Kaminska @ 2017-04-04 18:27 | 1 | 2017-04-04 18:50 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have tagged something as a village (place=village) but you have called it Llanddew church. Is it a church or the place? I think the place is called Llanddew. If it is a church, is this different from the Church of St David which is already in place? If so, you need to add a... |
| 2 | 2017-04-04 21:53 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | The village was already mapped as Llanddew, which was correct according to OS OpenData, my view is that this maps.me edit is probably a personal marker should be reverted, it altered an existing object. | |
| 47449510 by sirbeer @ 2017-04-04 17:34 | 1 | 2017-04-04 17:41 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have extended a footpath along some roads. We don't normally draw footpaths like that. If you want to describe a footpath beside a road we add sidewalk tags to the road rather than adding a distinct footpath. |
| 47441415 by carinaf @ 2017-04-04 12:35 | 1 | 2017-04-04 13:15 | chillly | Are you sure there's a pond there? |
| 2 | 2017-04-04 13:55 | carinaf ♦1 | Jup. Stayed there. | |
| 47424807 by cosmin voiculescu @ 2017-04-03 20:50 | 1 | 2017-04-03 21:34 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a shelter in a garden. What were you trying to do? Do you need any help? |
| 47389458 by Comber Community @ 2017-04-02 18:23 | 1 | 2017-04-02 19:47 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI'm not sure what you were trying to do here. Do you need any help? |
| 47365409 by Nicniss @ 2017-04-01 19:30 | 1 | 2017-04-01 19:36 | chillly | It is best to join the footpath to the road at Lakeside Gardens. This allows software routers to plot a route from the road to the footpath. |
| 47363777 by whysports @ 2017-04-01 18:27 | 1 | 2017-04-01 18:57 | chillly | Welcome to OSM, thanks for the detail. Is this a BMX track? If so we can tag it more precisely. |
| 47272418 by James Fraser @ 2017-03-29 19:56 | 1 | 2017-03-29 20:03 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. I wonder if the highway=pedestrian tags would be better as highway=footway. In the UK we usually use pedestrian on roads that were for vehicles but have been converted to pedestrian-only use, often as a shopping street. We use footway for any footpath. The ex... |
| 47270658 by Daniel Gregory @ 2017-03-29 19:07 | 1 | 2017-03-29 19:13 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. I wonder if the 'Closes Recreation Ground' would be better described as a recreation_ground rather than a park. There does look to be sports pitches there. |
| 47266491 by Joshua Danton Boyd @ 2017-03-29 17:01 | 1 | 2017-03-29 17:52 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIt seems that you know a bit about OSM, but perhaps not quite enough. You have added a point over the top of an area. The area contains the pub details that you have duplicated. We have an important policy that every object is only mapped once, and the experienced mapper added the ... |
| 47233289 by takekerr @ 2017-03-28 15:45 | 1 | 2017-03-28 15:57 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the details, always welcome. The name you have used has two parts, with the second part a capitalised version of the first part. In OSM we use lower case for tags, except names and references which use the case the name really has. Unless the business really is called &#... |
| 46993546 by delfimo @ 2017-03-19 21:01 | 1 | 2017-03-25 15:28 | chillly | We don't add postcodes to area. We only ever add postcodes to individual addresses. These can be a house or a business. To add a postcode the individual buildings can be drawn and have the postcode attached.Adding a postcode to an area doesn't work well, as most residential areas have ... |
| 46993183 by delfimo @ 2017-03-19 20:45 | 1 | 2017-03-25 15:24 | chillly | Hi, you have drawn the outline of something you have named 'Woodland'. You have used a name as a description which we don't do. If the area is a woodland it needs to be tagged as natural=wood. If it has a real name then it can be added, but a lot of woodland has no name. |
| 47070770 by Dr John O'Connor @ 2017-03-22 14:54 | 1 | 2017-03-22 15:32 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. It needs a little change to be more useful.You have added a point with only a name. OSM needs a tag to know what the object is and so how to display it. I would suggest you need to add amenity=clinic as well as the nameHope that helps |
| 47068825 by Alex Huntley @ 2017-03-22 13:40 | 1 | 2017-03-22 14:05 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIs Ben's house really an embassy? Can we stick to facts please? :-) |
| 47068773 by Sangeetha Mahesh @ 2017-03-22 13:38 | 1 | 2017-03-22 14:03 | chillly | Welcome to OSMDisused premises can be marked as such. A consistent way is to change from amenity=bar to disused:amenity=bar. You may remove the name too. This will prevent it showing up on the map. |
| 47046625 by Shaunllew @ 2017-03-21 17:45 | 1 | 2017-03-21 18:22 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYour parks seem a little odd. Parc Y Peggrem is clearly over the top of a house and garden.Parc y Llew is over the top of a recreation ground, which looks a better choice of tag to me. It also has the English name in the Welsh name tag (name:cy is for Welsh). Parc y Ddraig is a... |
| 47045941 by srfl92 @ 2017-03-21 17:16 | 1 | 2017-03-21 17:19 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have drawn a park over the top of a road. Are you sure there is a park there? |
| 47041479 by dialogueuk @ 2017-03-21 14:09 | 1 | 2017-03-21 14:48 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI wonder if you were experimenting with the editor and save your experiment. You have changed a pet shop into an interior design shop, that's fine if you meant that, but you added another interior design shop at the same place and somehow joined them in a boundary relation whi... |
| 2 | 2017-03-21 15:00 | dialogueuk ♦1 | Yes please...Perfect Pets has moved out, and Redvers Interiors moved in. There shroud not be a second shop or a boundary relation!Any help appreciated. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-21 15:09 | chillly | OK, I have tidied up the extra shop and relation. It may take a few minutes to appear and you may need to refresh the cache in your browser to see the change. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-21 15:22 | dialogueuk ♦1 | Thanks, much appreciated.Regards, Dave/. | |
| 47019244 by Lepton Flavour @ 2017-03-20 17:52 | 1 | 2017-03-20 19:04 | chillly | I think you have worried about the name not appearing and changed something that was already right. Is the whole area really a building, with a building in it? I'll try to put this right. Please be patient about the name appearing, it will. |
| 47012470 by Les Barker @ 2017-03-20 13:16 | 1 | 2017-03-20 13:42 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThis looks a strange place for a waste basket. They are usually in a public place, often next to a road. Combined with your note, is this an attempt to highlight a waste problem, such as fly tipping? If so, you could try using a reporting site like https://www.fixmystreet.com.\... |
| 46985732 by delfimo @ 2017-03-19 15:36 | 1 | 2017-03-19 15:39 | chillly | Looks good, thanks |
| 46985260 by delfimo @ 2017-03-19 15:20 | 1 | 2017-03-19 15:25 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI see you have added Humbleton Farm, which is great. We outline the farmyard, as best we can, and ass landuse=farmyard, not place=farm. That will make it consistent with most farms in the UK on OSM |
| 2 | 2017-03-19 15:30 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | You have also joined it to a powerline, which is obviously incorrect and to the centreline of Mill Lane. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-19 15:37 | delfimo ♦1 | Apologies. Have sorted now. Deleted old area as unable to figure out how to change area. | |
| 46965544 by Martin Hügi @ 2017-03-18 20:21 | 1 | 2017-03-18 20:23 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIs the wood really called New Town? It seems an odd name for a wood. |
| 2 | 2017-03-18 21:00 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | Yes, it is the site of some houses that were abandon when the occupant died of Cholera several hundred years ago. At least so I am reliably informed by the landowner, Major Ted Barclay. There is actually a small pond at the NE corner that I could add in. I do the woodland management plans for the es... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-18 21:04 | chillly | OK, interesting. The wood has a 'hole' in it for the pond. So it needs a similar treatment as the other lake, only this time the wood is the 'outer' and the pond is the 'inner'. Draw the pond then select both the wood and the pond and merge them from the menu. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-18 21:11 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | Ok will give that a go, thanks | |
| 5 | 2017-03-18 21:18 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | Did that work? How do you add nodes to your polygons? | |
| 6 | 2017-03-18 21:49 | chillly | You added the pond OK, but it is not in a 'hole' in the wood. As I said before, multipolygon editing is not as straightforward as simple editing. To add new nodes to an existing polygon, select the polygon. click and drag one of the centre markers between two existing nodes. The marker... | |
| 7 | 2017-03-18 21:52 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | How do you make a hole? Thanks for the new nodes info. What's an MP? | |
| 8 | 2017-03-18 21:57 | chillly | MP=multipolygon.In the online editor you are using you select both the wood and the pond (use shift click to select the second item). Then the ring menu has a plus (+) sign which is merge. Click that. That merges the two polygons as a multipolygon, thus making the pond into a hole in the wood. I... | |
| 46965563 by Martin Hügi @ 2017-03-18 20:22 | 1 | 2017-03-18 20:24 | chillly | Hmmm, would a deciduous wood really be called The Firs? Where are you getting these names from? |
| 2 | 2017-03-18 21:28 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | It is deciduous now. It was actually a Norway Spruce and European Larch plantation with some site-native broadleaved. So granted it should never have been called the Firs, but that's its name. Its quite common for people to refer to conifers as firs, but there are no native firs to the UK. Only... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-18 21:35 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | I work for the Woodland Trust as a project manager for ancient woodland restoration covering the SE and E of England. My work is all to do with converting ancient woodlands planted with non-native conifers to site-native broadleaf species. Here's a link to a guide to what I do that I wrote with... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-18 21:40 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | So do you need proof of what people are putting on OSM, how does it work. Do you do a certain amount of background checking to ensure it is not nonsense? Or does it really on the collective weight of many people to find and correct errors? | |
| 5 | 2017-03-18 21:41 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | Excuse typos. | |
| 6 | 2017-03-18 21:44 | chillly | We generally accept most stuff, but lately there's been a lot of junk stuff added by people trying to cheat at a game that uses OSM as it's map source. It is clear now that your edits are real and useful, sorry for the skepticism. | |
| 7 | 2017-03-18 21:49 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | That's ok. It is Saturday night after all, so I would be suspicious too | |
| 46965823 by Martin Hügi @ 2017-03-18 20:36 | 1 | 2017-03-18 20:40 | chillly | Hi, You would be better to space the postcode as normal, SG9 0HF. If some uses the map data to search for a place, using postcodes is common, such as in a sat-nav. Badly spaced postcodes don't work |
| 2 | 2017-03-18 20:44 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | Ok, what's normal? without the space then? I normally put a space, but then I accept I am not a SatNav. At least not knowingly. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-18 20:48 | chillly | You have entered it without a space. It would normally have a space before the last three digits. I know more about postcodes than is good for me, I maintain the UK postcode layer for OSM. http://codepoint.raggedred.net | |
| 4 | 2017-03-18 20:56 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | You are quite right. I had to check by starting to add another building. That's quite unusual for me, it was a typo. I normally put a space in, hence my first comment. I ocd-hate postcodes without spaces | |
| 5 | 2017-03-18 20:58 | chillly | Everyone starting out makes mistakes. The great thing is everything can be changed and improved. I hope you enjoy seeing your work for everyone else to see. If you need any help, feel free to send a message.Chris | |
| 6 | 2017-03-18 21:02 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | Thanks | |
| 46965626 by Martin Hügi @ 2017-03-18 20:25 | 1 | 2017-03-18 20:29 | chillly | Thanks for the detail. You have chosen a slightly advanced thing to edit, that is an object inside an object. We use an advanced object called a relation to draw the lake with a hole (the island) in it. What you have done is useful, would you like a hand incorporating the island with the lake? |
| 2 | 2017-03-18 20:42 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | Yes, ok. Thanks | |
| 3 | 2017-03-18 20:51 | chillly | I've joined the lake and island in a multipolygon relation. I removed the address fields, they are only used for buildings. The tags on the lake have moved to the relation, as is the norm. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-18 21:01 | Martin Hügi ♦4 | ok, got it. | |
| 46953137 by Firstyeoman @ 2017-03-18 11:11 | 1 | 2017-03-18 11:16 | chillly | Hi, Welcome to OSM.It is always a bit worrying when a new editor's first edit deletes something. Your comment simply says 'deleted Well', but no explanation as to why. Was it closed? Was it never there? Could you explain a little please? |
| 2 | 2017-03-18 12:20 | Firstyeoman ♦1 | Hi Chilly sorry this stems back to a while ago when I added the well because I couldn't find a water tower tag. I realise that the water tower was already there but I hadn't seen it because I had not zoomed in enough. I was simply getting rid of something that I had added but was never the... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-18 12:32 | chillly | That's fine, thanks for the explanation. From the aerial imagery that looks like a covered reservoir. If it is there are ways to map that ... :-) | |
| 46939838 by Greg Krawchuk @ 2017-03-17 19:48 | 1 | 2017-03-17 19:58 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a point with a name but you need to add a tag to describe what it is. Is this a place, a business, a building ... ? |
| 2 | 2017-03-17 20:11 | Greg Krawchuk ♦1 | —James Hunter, a younger son of Hunter ofHunterston, acquired the lands of Abbotshill, in the parishof Ayr, from Alan Stewart, Abbott of Crossraquel, by acharter, dated 11 May, 1569. He was father, by Janet Neilhis wife, of a son and heir,James Hunter, 2nd of Abbotshill, who got a ne... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-17 20:31 | chillly | I would suggest that you draw the outline of the main house, traced from the aerial imagery, and add a tag building=house to that. Then add the name tag to that. An isolated house always looks better if the access road is drawn too. highway=service would probably be best with access=private if that... | |
| 46911454 by Frolov Ákos @ 2017-03-16 21:43 | 1 | 2017-03-16 21:48 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIs there a really a bar right in the middle of a junction? :-) You need to find the building the bar is in and add the point to that building.Please if you need help |
| 46903086 by Ricky Burke @ 2017-03-16 16:29 | 1 | 2017-03-16 16:36 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThat looks much more like a football pitch than a park, but if, as the name you used implies, it is a village green then we have a tag for that too. |
| 2 | 2017-03-16 17:23 | Ricky Burke ♦1 | Ah, I couldn't see the Village Green tag. It's sometimes used as a football pitch, but its primary function is a village green. | |
| 46898923 by ExperimentalNarratives @ 2017-03-16 13:59 | 1 | 2017-03-16 15:54 | chillly | This edit has substantially altered the shape of the building to not match its real-life shape. I think this is to support a fictional story. This is not good practice. I expect this edit will be reverted (undone), and possibly the previous one too. See the comment on your previous edit for more inf... |
| 46898825 by ExperimentalNarratives @ 2017-03-16 13:53 | 1 | 2017-03-16 15:52 | chillly | Welcome to OSMJudging by the comment you added to this edit you are making changes to factual data to support a fictional story. This is not really what would expect OSM edits to be about. Using OSM to support a fictional event is great, but not if the real life stuff is changed to support the f... |
| 46869681 by Marcio Mattos @ 2017-03-15 13:52 | 1 | 2017-03-15 14:43 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a restaurant in the middle of a road junction. It would be better to add it on the building that the restaurant is in. Adding the name only in portuguese means it will not show up in the UK. You might like to add the name, as it is shown on the name board, in the nam... |
| 46841034 by Bensdog @ 2017-03-14 13:26 | 1 | 2017-03-14 13:34 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for this edit, detail is valuable. Unfortunately you have not quite got the tags right. We do not use the name tag to describe things, only to add a name. Gates and stiles need to be tagged with the barrier tag (barrier=gate for example). You have added tourism=informati... |
| 2 | 2017-04-04 10:00 | iccaldwell ♦24 | I have corrected this change set in change set 47437513 | |
| 46825563 by Kharris89 @ 2017-03-13 22:24 | 1 | 2017-03-13 22:26 | chillly | Is this a park, or just a piece of grass? Everything that is green is not always a park. |
| 46825491 by Kharris89 @ 2017-03-13 22:20 | 1 | 2017-03-13 22:25 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIf this is a an area for children to play on equipment such as a slide, swings etc, you might be better to tag it as a playground rather than a park. Playgrounds are often an area in a larger park.HTH |
| 46825444 by MissAngie12 @ 2017-03-13 22:17 | 1 | 2017-03-13 22:20 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!What are you actually trying to do here?You might find something like http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ more appropriate for whatever it is.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2017-03-13 22:23 | chillly | This follows a pattern. Whoever is coordinating this would be best to talk to someone in OSM (by adding a comment here or sending a direct message to me). These edits are likely to be deleted, they are not useful in OSM, so this work will be lost. | |
| 46825021 by RogerDunn45 @ 2017-03-13 21:56 | 1 | 2017-03-13 22:02 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThis is the second edit this evening adding a very strange plateau in this locality. Is this part of a course or a some other related group?This really does not look valid for the area. I think both edits are likely to be removed. |
| 2 | 2017-03-13 22:06 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Unlike the other one, there probably is a bit of moraine under here (it's a raised bit west of the Rother and the clue's in the nae "Stonegravels") but ir's doesn't really belong in OSM as it stands.What are you actually trying to do?You might find something like ht... | |
| 46824790 by au1jotu @ 2017-03-13 21:44 | 1 | 2017-03-13 21:48 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI'm guessing this was an experiment. The park, the mosque and the cave entrance all seem unlikely.I can help out if you need this reverting (undoing). |
| 46824411 by dbd77 @ 2017-03-13 21:25 | 1 | 2017-03-13 21:28 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have doodled a lot of types of stuff near Daniel Avenue. It is clearly a doodle, so I will revert (delete) it. You perhaps didn't realise your were saving to the live database. |
| 46824124 by Permafrozen @ 2017-03-13 21:12 | 1 | 2017-03-13 21:18 | chillly | Welcome to OSMWhat is this edit all about? Did you realise that you were saving to the live database? You seem to have a very odd group of tags and names for an urban part of UK.Do you need some help with this edit? I can remove it for you if that is what is needed. |
| 2 | 2017-03-13 21:56 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | It's not much of a plateau certainly - St Augustine's Road is very much a hill with the river at the eastern end of it, and the road that drops down to Queen's Park is likewise.What exactly is it supposed to be? | |
| 46820502 by Edouard Lescot @ 2017-03-13 18:23 | 1 | 2017-03-13 18:31 | chillly | Welcome to OSMWith a comment about the edit of 'test' you have deleted data from the public database. Did you realise you were doing that? Do you need any help with this. I can undo your edit so the things you deleted are restored. |
| 46819034 by brianboru @ 2017-03-13 17:27 | 1 | 2017-03-13 18:16 | chillly | This is an import, right? Where's the unique userid? Where's the wiki import page? Where's the Imports mailing list discussion? |
| 2 | 2017-03-13 22:54 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hi Brian,It looks like things may have got a bit ahead of themselves here. The only list discussion that I can see for this is at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-westmidlands/2017-March/002127.html , and that's not really a discussion as much as you saying "I'd l... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-19 15:15 | pigsonthewing ♦10 | Other issues are already being discussed elsewhere, but "Betula sp" (strictly, with italicised "Betula" and period in "sp.") is the correct taxonomic designation for a specimen of the genus Betula, whose exact species is not known.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speci... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-19 17:17 | SK53 ♦864 | @pigsonthewing: there is also a widely used genus tag, which is particularly appropriate for trees not identified to species (and generally useful because of the vagaries of the taxonomy of various street trees). | |
| 46818814 by Catsailing @ 2017-03-13 17:19 | 1 | 2017-03-13 17:27 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.The area you have added as a meadow is not one. A meadow is a very special type of land in the UK. It was already marked as farmland which looks correct to me.I propose to revert (delete) this edit, what do you think? |
| 46817332 by Bananase @ 2017-03-13 16:23 | 1 | 2017-03-13 16:30 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThe 'park' you have added is not a park in OSM terms. It is landuse=farmland. I doubt it is called "Farmer's Field". You have drawn it over the top of a number of houses.I will revert (delete) this edit. |
| 46816772 by Steve1275 @ 2017-03-13 16:00 | 1 | 2017-03-13 16:03 | chillly | This looks like a private garden. I will revert (delete) this edit. |
| 46816746 by Steve1275 @ 2017-03-13 15:59 | 1 | 2017-03-13 16:02 | chillly | Welcome to OSMParks are best added as an area not just a point. |
| 46721993 by Zopps @ 2017-03-09 20:57 | 1 | 2017-03-09 21:01 | chillly | Welcome to OSMLooking at the park, I wonder if recreation ground might be better? The individual pitches can be mapped too if you want (leisure=pitch, sport=xxx) Does the park / rec have a name? |
| 2 | 2017-03-13 15:41 | lostmike ♦65 | Since Zopes is a Pokemon go player I think any added parks should be regarded as suspect.See http://www.openstreetmap.org/message/read/625774 | |
| 3 | 2017-03-13 15:43 | chillly | Only lost mike can read that message. Not all Pokémon players' work is poor quality. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-13 15:50 | lostmike ♦65 | I agree. I was probably a little too harsh in my comment. | |
| 5 | 2017-03-13 16:13 | Zopps ♦2 | I was entirely transparent mike. I have not and will not be adding any false data. True I am adding to experiment with the notion that osm data is used to govern the spawn of pokemon. But I am only adding real location data, which in turn furthers osm as a by product :) | |
| 6 | 2017-03-13 21:32 | lostmike ♦65 | I agree. I apologise. | |
| 46787177 by Danny McMullan @ 2017-03-12 15:12 | 1 | 2017-03-12 15:22 | chillly | Adding a pitch is a good idea. We usually draw the whole area like you have done and describe that as, say, a recreation ground. That can carry a name and maybe opening times. Then draw the outline of the pitch more precisely and only tag that as pitch and sport.Hope that helps |
| 46787116 by Danny McMullan @ 2017-03-12 15:10 | 1 | 2017-03-12 15:17 | chillly | Added a park that covers the river really isn't the way to do it. You need to be more fine detailed than that. |
| 46786650 by Danny McMullan @ 2017-03-12 14:52 | 1 | 2017-03-12 14:57 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added an area but you haven't tagged it as anything. OSM needs to know what you are adding in order to make use of it.The second area looks a bit of a doodle. Do you need any help with this? |
| 46760951 by sav321 @ 2017-03-11 12:09 | 1 | 2017-03-11 12:57 | chillly | Welcome to OSMLooking at the aerial imagery, you seem to have a drawn a park over the top of some buildings. Have the buildings been demolished recently? Have you made a mistake? Do you need any help with this? |
| 46750563 by greendra @ 2017-03-10 21:44 | 1 | 2017-03-10 21:46 | chillly | Have these buildings really been destroyed or is this an effort to attract Pokémon?I will revert this edit. |
| 2 | 2017-03-10 22:42 | greendra ♦1 | I'm pretty sure they blew up. C'MON MAN I NEED THAT PIKACHU! >:(Just kidding. Sorry for wasting your time. A nice site / idea this whole community mapping thing is though :) | |
| 3 | 2017-03-10 23:05 | chillly | It will be even better if you add some of your local knowledge too :-)You Pokemon guys can help, you go out and about, even if you only add a little of what you see here and there it all helps.Enjoy. | |
| 46750761 by Draycott10 @ 2017-03-10 21:54 | 1 | 2017-03-10 21:56 | chillly | Welcome to OSMparks are better drawn as an area rather than a point. |
| 46750663 by greendra @ 2017-03-10 21:48 | 1 | 2017-03-10 21:54 | chillly | Thanks.This stuff looks real. You might like to click the icon that makes the houses have right angles. Most houses have squared off corners. |
| 46750518 by greendra @ 2017-03-10 21:42 | 1 | 2017-03-10 21:43 | chillly | Another imaginary park. I will revert this too. |
| 46750469 by greendra @ 2017-03-10 21:39 | 1 | 2017-03-10 21:43 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a park over the top of a house. We welcome new editors adding new stuff but it must be real stuff, in the right place, correctly described. This isn't, so I will revert (undo) this edit. |
| 46723375 by gambles @ 2017-03-09 21:58 | 1 | 2017-03-09 22:02 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail.Your small park has a name that looks like a description. We only use names that can be verified, so names on name boards for example. |
| 46723340 by iSchmuelio @ 2017-03-09 21:56 | 1 | 2017-03-09 22:00 | chillly | Welcome to OSMFrom the aerial imagery your park is someone's garden. New edits are welcome but they must be real, in the right place and correctly described. I'm not sure your edit quite meets this. Do you need help? |
| 46722279 by jariussssss @ 2017-03-09 21:09 | 1 | 2017-03-09 21:13 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added Cairntows park over the top of the existing Cairntows Park. I will remove your extra park. Pokémon will still recognise the old park :-) |
| 46722071 by Zopps @ 2017-03-09 21:00 | 1 | 2017-03-09 21:03 | chillly | You can add an English name (name:en Dr Owen Park) and a Welsh name too (name:cw=Parc Dr Owen). Hope that makes sense, my Welsh is very sketchy. |
| 2 | 2017-03-09 21:21 | Zopps ♦2 | ok will do.thanks for the input :) | |
| 46719717 by Curky @ 2017-03-09 19:32 | 1 | 2017-03-09 19:38 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the extra details. In OSM terms this is a leisure=playground, not a park. Hope that helps. |
| 46718943 by jack98w9q89w @ 2017-03-09 19:06 | 1 | 2017-03-09 19:08 | chillly | Putting imaginary stuff over the top of real stuff is vandalism. I will revert this edit |
| 46717406 by Jinzal @ 2017-03-09 18:10 | 1 | 2017-03-09 18:15 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a park over the top of an existing park. This is not a good idea.I will revert (undo) this edit. |
| 2 | 2017-03-09 18:16 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, the park was already mapped so I have removed your duplication and put the name onto the existing area. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-16 15:44 | DaveF ♦1,566 | Removed | |
| 46717213 by David Tonks @ 2017-03-09 18:03 | 1 | 2017-03-09 18:09 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have changes a children's playground into a park. A park is an area not a point ( a playground is often an area too). We welcome edits from everyone, but they need to be real things, in the right place and correctly described. |
| 46716723 by kbrooks25 @ 2017-03-09 17:49 | 1 | 2017-03-09 18:00 | chillly | Welcome to OSMWe draw parks as areas, not points. It is usual to draw roads in first as part of a new development. It you don't have a GPS (or a phone with a GPS in it) maybe a note would be best saying there is a new development so someone else can follow it up later. |
| 46711491 by BungleBear @ 2017-03-09 14:42 | 1 | 2017-03-09 15:11 | chillly | Reverted |
| 46711440 by BungleBear @ 2017-03-09 14:40 | 1 | 2017-03-09 15:10 | chillly | I have reverted this and your second edit. Both involved dragging points to new places. You can create new points and lines rather than drag stuff around. |
| 46600898 by Soyeon2514 @ 2017-03-05 16:55 | 1 | 2017-03-05 17:34 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIs there really a tourist attraction slap bang in the middle of Charing Cross road? |
| 46572594 by Noah Helmi @ 2017-03-04 13:27 | 1 | 2017-03-04 14:19 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. It looks as though you added the postcode as the house number. Adding the postcode correctly makes is easier to find |
| 46561239 by Yusuf Ilter @ 2017-03-03 23:06 | 1 | 2017-03-03 23:11 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThe restaurant looks rather close to the road. Shouldn't it be where the buildings are? Postcodes are very useful, but they need to be correctly formed, so they need a single space in the right place in the middleHTH |
| 46561218 by jojop09 @ 2017-03-03 23:03 | 1 | 2017-03-03 23:09 | chillly | Again you need to add tags to describe what you have added. In OSM a ginnel is highway=service + service=alley. |
| 46561176 by jojop09 @ 2017-03-03 23:01 | 1 | 2017-03-03 23:08 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a line with a name which looks like a description. We reserve the name tag for real names, usually from a sign. If the path is a path that isn't just informal, you need to add a tag to describe what it is, probably highway=footway.HTH |
| 46559972 by mitchellmm01 @ 2017-03-03 21:51 | 1 | 2017-03-03 21:54 | chillly | Welcome to OSMPlease don't experiment by adding to the live database. There's a host of ways to ask questions of the community. I will revert (undo) this edit. |
| 46533691 by JM1918 @ 2017-03-02 21:30 | 1 | 2017-03-02 21:45 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIs there really a defined footpath across a pitch and through the bushes? |
| 46498509 by Mantel Farm @ 2017-03-01 16:32 | 1 | 2017-03-01 17:16 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a farm in the middle of a road. I expect that a farm will on the land at one side of the road. We are very fussy about copyright, taking stuff from a web site without permission is not the best. |
| 46476309 by j9w4 @ 2017-02-28 19:30 | 1 | 2017-02-28 19:33 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI think you may have been trying out the editor and saved it by mistake. Even the lovely Liverpool doesn't have a desert on the outskirts. Would you like me to revert (undo) your edit? |
| 46460356 by scleija @ 2017-02-28 07:29 | 1 | 2017-02-28 16:11 | MKnight ♦910 | We map for the Database and not for "the map". Should be revert. |
| 2 | 2017-02-28 16:23 | SK53 ♦864 | Indeed, this is a personal judgement, based on a single use case. There are tens of use cases for the mapping of trees (including "because they are there" & no single user has any arbitrary right to override what is mapped based on a use case. As long as things can be ground truthed (f... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-28 16:34 | chillly | If you want to see the map without the trees, render your own map and ignore the trees, don't delete them!http://switch2osm.org | |
| 46470133 by supptora @ 2017-02-28 15:11 | 1 | 2017-02-28 15:19 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the new details. I see you have added parks. Not everything that is a green space gets tagged as a park. The sports fields in particular are probably better tagged as a recreation ground. The individual pitches can then be drawn and tagged as leisure=pitch with a sport=x... |
| 2 | 2017-02-28 15:20 | chillly | Also, has the fire station now been turned into part of the green space? | |
| 3 | 2017-02-28 15:25 | supptora ♦1 | Corrected those bits, but I'm unsure on adding the pitches as they're often not very clear/well managed. | |
| 4 | 2017-02-28 15:29 | chillly | Just add what you feel you want to. More detail is good but if you make a mistake it can always be changed later. Any buildings you want to add create a lot of context for other features.However, be careful.Editing can be addictive! | |
| 5 | 2017-02-28 15:32 | supptora ♦1 | Thanks. Haha, I'll try to not get too ahead of myself! | |
| 46387390 by Mapmoo @ 2017-02-25 08:35 | 1 | 2017-02-27 19:36 | chillly | Ye olde white hart was already in the map. |
| 2 | 2017-02-27 21:13 | Mapmoo ♦2 | Hi chilly,yeah I saw it after I zoomed out,I was looking at the exact place the pub is it's on the left of the path as you face north | |
| 46425115 by Blackcatmotorcycles @ 2017-02-26 20:23 | 1 | 2017-02-26 20:28 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have tagged the end of a road as Black Cat Motorcycles. I suspect that business isn't on the road, but in one of the buildings around the road. You might like to add a point to where the business really is and add the business details to that. HTH |
| 46394268 by TigOlBiddies187 @ 2017-02-25 14:30 | 1 | 2017-02-25 14:34 | chillly | I suggest that the footway joins Delamere road, so it should join the road by sharing a point on it. This allows router software to suggest a walking route using your new path. HTH |
| 46394220 by TigOlBiddies187 @ 2017-02-25 14:27 | 1 | 2017-02-25 14:32 | chillly | Welcome to OSMWe generally don't add footpaths beside roads as separate entities. We use the sidewalk tag on the road to describe them instead. |
| 46378633 by davidbalcombe @ 2017-02-24 20:21 | 1 | 2017-02-24 20:31 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThe landuse=farm tagging you have removed is rather out of date because it was ambiguous. We now use landuse=farmland for example on fields, both arable and pasture. We use landuse=farmyard for the area around farm buildings. HTH |
| 46375600 by Clear Diamond Auto Glass Mesa @ 2017-02-24 18:48 | 1 | 2017-02-24 18:54 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a blank point in London, England. Was this a mistake? Would you like me to remove it? |
| 46375327 by Harry Dwyer Photography @ 2017-02-24 18:43 | 1 | 2017-02-24 18:44 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou've added your business at the end of a road, whereas I expect you business will be in one the buildings alongside the road. If you need any help, please ask |
| 46366261 by alicecaddis @ 2017-02-24 12:44 | 1 | 2017-02-24 13:54 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIf this is a play area, maybe a better tag would be leisure=playground |
| 2 | 2017-02-24 13:55 | chillly | Has the footpath you changed to be a road really been converted to a road? | |
| 3 | 2017-02-24 17:15 | alicecaddis ♦1 | It is a road but not a through road, looks better now, thanks. | |
| 46348301 by Jamesg2005 @ 2017-02-23 20:22 | 1 | 2017-02-23 20:27 | chillly | The line you have draw is intended to be a footpath, from your edit comment. You need to add tags to describe it - probably highway=footway. Footpaths are connected to other routes, such as the roads. This allows routers to describe routes using the footpath.If you need help, please ask |
| 46348272 by Jamesg2005 @ 2017-02-23 20:21 | 1 | 2017-02-23 20:25 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added an area, but you haven't any tags to describe what the area is. It could be a park, a car park, a construction site ...If you need any help, please ask. |
| 46320282 by Xccdeefd Vasddf @ 2017-02-22 21:40 | 1 | 2017-02-22 21:47 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a tourist viewpoint over a house. Would you like some help with this? |
| 2 | 2020-10-08 19:49 | Paul Berry ♦124 | Clearly wrong and no activity from the original mapper for over 3 years so I've deleted it (changeset #92194135). | |
| 46256503 by Scriabin @ 2017-02-20 21:22 | 1 | 2017-02-20 21:26 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.I'm not sure what you are trying to add. You have added areas, but without any tags to describe what kind of object it is. Is it a building, a car park, a building site ...? |
| 46219599 by Juliphine @ 2017-02-19 16:00 | 1 | 2017-02-19 16:08 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a couple of pedestrian ways. In the UK pedestrian roads are usually in urban areas, such as a pedestrian shopping street. I think you may mean highway=footway |
| 2 | 2017-02-20 10:05 | blackadder ♦51 | Have cleaned up and added some more detail from BING | |
| 46200660 by Emily Rives @ 2017-02-18 19:53 | 1 | 2017-02-18 20:20 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.If you are trying to help people find your business, you might like to add address details, especially the postcode, that helps people searching. |
| 46196896 by tylerdevinescott @ 2017-02-18 16:52 | 1 | 2017-02-18 16:58 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a name to a point for a park, but the park is already there. We try to only add any object once. You could have added the name to the area for the park. OSM is a bit daunting for beginners, so I hope this helps. Please ask if you need help. |
| 46196626 by SLBD @ 2017-02-18 16:41 | 1 | 2017-02-18 16:55 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI'm not really sure what you were trying to do here. You have created an area, given it a name that looks like a road name and added something that looks like a postcode that can't apply to the whole area.I wonder if you were experimenting and didn't mean to save... |
| 2 | 2017-03-04 17:15 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | No response so fiction removed. | |
| 46171635 by Omar Badran @ 2017-02-17 17:45 | 1 | 2017-02-17 17:50 | chillly | Are you sure there is a drain there? Were you experimenting? Do you need any help with this? |
| 45925506 by Spidey @ 2017-02-08 18:03 Active block | 1 | 2017-02-16 22:53 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | ?? |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 17:45 | chillly | reverted | |
| 3 | 2017-02-17 17:46 | chillly | reverted | |
| 45955690 by Spidey @ 2017-02-09 19:39 Active block | 1 | 2017-02-16 22:52 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Personal marker? |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 17:45 | chillly | reverted | |
| 46009402 by Spidey @ 2017-02-11 23:47 Active block | 1 | 2017-02-16 22:41 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | More personal markers? |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 17:44 | chillly | reverted | |
| 46018453 by Spidey @ 2017-02-12 12:37 Active block | 1 | 2017-02-16 22:40 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | These look like personal markers, what are you trying to achieve? |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 17:43 | chillly | reverted | |
| 46030832 by Spidey @ 2017-02-12 21:27 Active block | 1 | 2017-02-12 22:34 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | A Chalet in Osbaston? Seems unlikely |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 17:42 | chillly | reverted | |
| 46146051 by Spidey @ 2017-02-16 19:35 Active block | 1 | 2017-02-16 22:36 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Hi, this looks a bit odd. What are you trying to achieve? Maybe we can help. |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 17:41 | chillly | reverted | |
| 46162397 by Spidey @ 2017-02-17 11:57 Active block | 1 | 2017-02-17 16:02 | chillly | Are these really chalets? Why are there people's names on them? |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 17:41 | chillly | reverted | |
| 46166181 by Spidey @ 2017-02-17 14:25 Active block | 1 | 2017-02-17 17:40 | chillly | reverted |
| 46146454 by brendonlong95 @ 2017-02-16 19:53 | 1 | 2017-02-16 21:10 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.We don't accept these kind of personal memoirs. I have removed it. |
| 46136749 by daveru @ 2017-02-16 13:13 | 1 | 2017-02-16 14:29 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have marked out the route of something but you haven't tagged it to show what it is. If you want to show a farm track you need to add a tag, such as highway=track or highway=service so the renderer knows what to do with it.HTH |
| 46082227 by AdamGlo @ 2017-02-14 15:41 | 1 | 2017-02-14 15:46 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have deleted a lot of stuff for your map design project. Do you realise that this is a public deletion? Are you trying to create a map image with less stuff on it or has this deleted stuff really disappeared from the world?I will revert (undo) this edit in a few min... |
| 2 | 2017-02-14 16:15 | AdamGlo ♦1 | Please do, i was trying to create a personal custmised map, but dont know exactly how to do this | |
| 3 | 2017-02-14 16:19 | chillly | Any editing of the data here is public, so anything you add, change or delete affects everyone. | |
| 46051208 by Stephen Perry @ 2017-02-13 15:49 | 1 | 2017-02-13 18:13 | chillly | Welcome to OSM, thanks for the detail.In the changeset comment you mention the builders' plans. We cannot use copyright sources to edit OSM unless you have written approval to use that data specifically for OSM. You can just walk around the site and see what is really there. There'... |
| 46007707 by hellolowry @ 2017-02-11 21:41 | 1 | 2017-02-11 22:21 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIs there really a park there? |
| 2 | 2017-02-11 22:41 | hellolowry ♦1 | More of a small grassy play area for the children in the apartment complex. The complex brings out toys for the kids in summer. May have tagged wrong as new to this. | |
| 45957273 by petebaz @ 2017-02-09 20:50 | 1 | 2017-02-11 12:07 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.You have added a point to describe Pocklington school. This is a simple way to describe an object. Another way is to attach the details to the area that describes the school, which someone has already done. To avoid breaking the rule that says each object should only be described ... |
| 45984947 by pinkyponk33 @ 2017-02-10 21:35 | 1 | 2017-02-10 21:55 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have deleted a building and changed it into a park. Is this a mistake? |
| 45875464 by parukhin @ 2017-02-07 06:13 | 1 | 2017-02-09 11:36 | chillly | Where was this mass edit discussed?Undiscussed mass edits must be reverted. |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 17:12 | parukhin ♦153 | Hi, chillly.No, these edits were not discussed.Where can i find definition for "mass edit"? | |
| 3 | 2017-02-09 17:24 | chillly | http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct | |
| 4 | 2017-02-09 18:10 | parukhin ♦153 | No, these edits not Automated edits.Why do you think I use bots or scripts?I manully edit opening_hours tags or use JOSM quality checks to fix typo, weekdays name in local languages etc. and review my edits before uploading.See for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463305182/history | |
| 5 | 2017-02-10 01:26 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Unfortunately some information has been lost, for example from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465154598/history - that used to say "Opening times dependent on custom" but now someone looking at the shop would think it had fixed opening and closing times. | |
| 6 | 2017-02-10 04:57 | parukhin ♦153 | Add to description https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465154598 | |
| 45919079 by Fax2709 @ 2017-02-08 14:49 | 1 | 2017-02-08 15:08 | chillly | You have now repeated adding a guest house, in the middle of the road. Please delete one and move the other to the correct place before some deletes it. |
| 45918828 by Fax2709 @ 2017-02-08 14:41 | 1 | 2017-02-08 15:06 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a point in the middle of a road, and described it as a guest house. We like to be more precise with the location, perhaps you could drag it to the actual location, the buildings around are mapped, is it in one of them? |
| 45914318 by AdamW2405 @ 2017-02-08 11:59 | 1 | 2017-02-08 12:10 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for your edit. You seem to have removed the building tags from McDonalds and the pub. This means they will not render (not show on the map). Your new Lidl also needs a building tag. All buildings need some kind of building tag to render. OSM can be hard to understand at ... |
| 2 | 2017-02-08 18:31 | AdamW2405 ♦1 | Ah thank you. I thought because this is a brand new estate and only just finished building meant still in construction. My apologies, I won't make the same mistake in the future :) | |
| 45895239 by mickie2hunned @ 2017-02-07 19:35 | 1 | 2017-02-07 20:17 | chillly | I am going to undo your doodles. If you want some help with editing, please ask.We want new editors, but the things you add or change must be real things, in the right place and correctly described. |
| 45894963 by mickie2hunned @ 2017-02-07 19:28 | 1 | 2017-02-07 20:15 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have made some odd edits. I suspect you were testing the editor and saved your experiments. I will revert (undo) your edit. |
| 45884022 by jpbutler23 @ 2017-02-07 12:28 | 1 | 2017-02-07 12:33 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIs this really one house or several properties in a terrace? You have tagged it as a single house. |
| 2 | 2017-02-07 12:56 | jpbutler23 ♦1 | Apologies, this is several houses. I'll change it now! | |
| 3 | 2017-02-07 12:58 | chillly | No need to apologise. New mappers make mistakes, OSM is complex. If you need help, please ask. | |
| 45857368 by Rakiah @ 2017-02-06 14:23 | 1 | 2017-02-06 14:37 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.It is good to add new things, especially as places change. II hope this is from your own personal knowledge. We must never copy from another source, such as Google. |
| 45835231 by Vincent Rostron @ 2017-02-05 17:39 | 1 | 2017-02-05 17:52 | chillly | Please don't use the name tag to describe something, only to display the name.If you can't make the edit (because you need a better editor for example) you could add a note to describe the change needed. |
| 45835186 by Vincent Rostron @ 2017-02-05 17:37 | 1 | 2017-02-05 17:49 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the updates. We don't use the name to describe thinks. If it has no name we don't use one. To mark a pub as being closed, just remove the name and amenity=pub tag from the object. If it doesn't have a pub tag any more it isn't a pub.HTH |
| 2 | 2017-02-05 17:50 | chillly | Looking again you used Maps.me. You might a more powerful editor to make the changes I suggested. | |
| 45815576 by Esteii @ 2017-02-04 21:20 | 1 | 2017-02-04 21:24 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.The park looks a bit of a muddle. There should be an outline, but yours has various crossing lines. Would you like to sort it out, or would yo like help? |
| 45805072 by L12NB @ 2017-02-04 13:18 | 1 | 2017-02-04 13:55 | chillly | Reverted |
| 45804804 by L12NB @ 2017-02-04 13:06 | 1 | 2017-02-04 13:39 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a park over the top of the existing village green. We only map everything once, so your new park doesn't follow that guideline. The outline includes a strange 'jag' across the middle. I suggest your park is removed and the name is transferred t... |
| 2 | 2017-02-04 13:55 | chillly | Looking at the later edits, this has been reverted (undone) with other stuff too | |
| 45788218 by Andy Kippen @ 2017-02-03 19:34 | 1 | 2017-02-03 19:47 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Your comment says playing field football. I doubt you would get a decent game in that park! Why is it so small and so round? Do you need any help? |
| 45788136 by JPRJ @ 2017-02-03 19:30 | 1 | 2017-02-03 19:42 | chillly | Has this road, clearly visible on the aerial imagery, really not there any more? It may not be a tarmaced road, but it still deserves to be in OSM, perhaps as a service road or a track. Would you like this restored so you can change the tagging to be more appropriate? |
| 45788144 by JPRJ @ 2017-02-03 19:30 | 1 | 2017-02-03 19:32 | chillly | You have deleted a road. Has it really been removed? |
| 45788035 by JPRJ @ 2017-02-03 19:25 | 1 | 2017-02-03 19:28 | chillly | When you add buildings it can help if you 'square up' te building. There's a button to click to help with that when the building is selected. HTH |
| 45787886 by JPRJ @ 2017-02-03 19:17 | 1 | 2017-02-03 19:26 | chillly | You have an upper case 'L' in the road name.HTH |
| 45787966 by JPRJ @ 2017-02-03 19:22 | 1 | 2017-02-03 19:25 | chillly | You seem to have deleted almost all of the points along the path, making it a straight path, which seems unlikely. Would you like help to restore the path? |
| 45787992 by JPRJ @ 2017-02-03 19:23 | 1 | 2017-02-03 19:24 | chillly | Welcome to OSMWe don't add paths next to raods in most cases. Use the sidewalk tags for the road instead, HTH |
| 2 | 2017-02-05 09:43 | JPRJ ♦1 | Thank you.There is no road here. That is the correction I am making. The Close ends where I have marked it and there is only a footpath connecting the end of The Close to Lower End. | |
| 45782897 by keela Young @ 2017-02-03 16:15 | 1 | 2017-02-03 16:27 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Your comment indicates you are mapping in Malawi. You have deleted a road in Windsor, UK. Were you testing the editor and saved something by mistake?Do you need any help sorting this out? |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 16:39 | chillly | I have reverted (undone) these changes as the best way to recover the deleted road (in Winslow) and remove the untagged addition to the school. | |
| 45776225 by Bridgend Volvo Specialist Bvs @ 2017-02-03 11:55 | 1 | 2017-02-03 12:12 | chillly | Thanks for responding. Looks much better. |
| 45775456 by Bridgend Volvo Specialist Bvs @ 2017-02-03 11:21 | 1 | 2017-02-03 11:26 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. You have added a new, small building over the top of an existing building. If you are trying to show that only part of the building is used by the business, we would add a point to show that rather than a whole new building. If you are trying to show that the... |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 11:57 | Bridgend Volvo Specialist Bvs ♦1 | Thanks, I've removed the building and added a point, its one large building | |
| 45770512 by Rokas Piekus @ 2017-02-03 07:49 | 1 | 2017-02-03 08:24 | chillly | reverted |
| 45769426 by Rokas Piekus @ 2017-02-03 06:53 | 1 | 2017-02-03 08:24 | chillly | reverted |
| 45768793 by Rokas Piekus @ 2017-02-03 06:17 | 1 | 2017-02-03 08:24 | chillly | reverted |
| 45763457 by Rokas Piekus @ 2017-02-03 00:15 | 1 | 2017-02-03 00:41 | MCDA ♦112 | It is highly unlikely there are ATM's in these location. Please revert this changeset. |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 08:24 | chillly | reverted | |
| 45756121 by Rokas Piekus @ 2017-02-02 18:49 | 1 | 2017-02-02 19:26 | chillly | Welcome to OSMAre you sure there is an ATM in this farmyard? |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 00:40 | MCDA ♦112 | I doubt it, all changesets to date look incorrect | |
| 3 | 2017-02-03 08:23 | chillly | reverted | |
| 45759867 by A1denc @ 2017-02-02 20:56 | 1 | 2017-02-02 21:05 | chillly | We don't draw footpaths next to roads unless they are separated by other stuff, such as a fence. If you want to add footways like this please use the sidewalk tag on the road. |
| 45759854 by A1denc @ 2017-02-02 20:55 | 1 | 2017-02-02 21:00 | chillly | This is not a pond. Please stop adding imaginary stuff. |
| 45759277 by A1denc @ 2017-02-02 20:30 | 1 | 2017-02-02 20:43 | chillly | Is this really a lake? |
| 45759231 by A1denc @ 2017-02-02 20:29 | 1 | 2017-02-02 20:42 | chillly | Is this really a lake? |
| 45759214 by A1denc @ 2017-02-02 20:28 | 1 | 2017-02-02 20:41 | chillly | From the aerial images, the pond looks made up. Please stop adding made up stuff. |
| 45759111 by A1denc @ 2017-02-02 20:24 | 1 | 2017-02-02 20:38 | chillly | The water is made up. Please stop adding made up stuff. |
| 45758903 by A1denc @ 2017-02-02 20:17 | 1 | 2017-02-02 20:36 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI wonder if you were testing the editor and accidentally saved your tests. The ponds don't exist, the path over the top of a road is not right, so I'm going to revert (undo) these edits.We would welcome you adding new stuff, but it has to be real things, in the right ... |
| 45757043 by kandifoxie @ 2017-02-02 19:21 | 1 | 2017-02-02 19:42 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThe new paths would be best connected to the roads. That way software and games can offer routes that really work. |
| 2 | 2017-02-02 21:33 | ACS1986 ♦61 | Welcome to OSM kandiefoxie and well done on starting to add the shortcut paths round Kingsfold - I've been meaning to get round to it for ages!I second Chilly's advice. Always connect highways to the other highways they join | |
| 45727546 by Robbo276 @ 2017-02-01 21:05 | 1 | 2017-02-01 21:50 | chillly | You have changed a road in Uganda to a footpath, named footpath, added a faintly ridiculous park and doodled a footpath. We want new people to add stuuf, but it has to be real stuff, in the right place correctly described. |
| 45727580 by Robbo276 @ 2017-02-01 21:07 | 1 | 2017-02-01 21:45 | chillly | Another walking route rather than a real footway |
| 45727726 by Robbo276 @ 2017-02-01 21:13 | 1 | 2017-02-01 21:44 | chillly | Another doodle rather than a real path |
| 45727796 by Robbo276 @ 2017-02-01 21:17 | 1 | 2017-02-01 21:43 | chillly | Another route rather than a real footway |
| 45727847 by Robbo276 @ 2017-02-01 21:20 | 1 | 2017-02-01 21:42 | chillly | This looks like another route rather than a real footway. |
| 45727402 by Robbo276 @ 2017-02-01 20:58 | 1 | 2017-02-01 21:40 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThe path you have added looks more like a route you have walked. We don't add routes like this, only footways that someone else would be able to see if they visited. |
| 45714192 by GarethKeenanTA @ 2017-02-01 11:49 | 1 | 2017-02-01 11:56 | chillly | This new park is clearly made up. It is over the top of houses. I will remove it. |
| 45714220 by GarethKeenanTA @ 2017-02-01 11:50 | 1 | 2017-02-01 11:55 | chillly | This path is clearly made up. It crosses houses. I will remove it.We welcome new mappers and new detail, but it must be real stuff, in the right place and correctly described. |
| 45714150 by GarethKeenanTA @ 2017-02-01 11:47 | 1 | 2017-02-01 11:53 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a new footpath that looks more like a route that you have walked. Does it really loop around that narrow park like that? |
| 45713260 by Drgonzo1210 @ 2017-02-01 10:59 | 1 | 2017-02-01 11:49 | chillly | You seem to have added a place of worship over what looks like a private house. Is that really a church? |
| 45713229 by Drgonzo1210 @ 2017-02-01 10:58 | 1 | 2017-02-01 11:48 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI wonder if you were trying out the editor and saved your tests. Nothing you have tried to add is going to render as it doesn't have any tags on it. You have two areas where one covers the other. You also have a line over the top of an existing road.Are you going to sort th... |
| 45712620 by Attai @ 2017-02-01 10:29 | 1 | 2017-02-01 10:33 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the new road. You may like to join it to Millhall Road. This allows routing by phone and satnav to get people to the road.HTH |
| 2 | 2017-02-01 10:37 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Also please could you capitalise the name correctly, thanks | |
| 45694857 by W_ffles @ 2017-01-31 19:18 | 1 | 2017-01-31 19:21 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThe path you have added look more like a route that you walked rather than a path. Please don't add routes like this.I will remove this path |
| 45691896 by Antonain @ 2017-01-31 17:38 | 1 | 2017-01-31 17:48 | chillly | Welcome to OSMMeadows in the UK are very special habitat that is very carefully grazed, some hay is grown and mown all to encourage wild flowers. If your meadows fit that, great, but if not you might like lanude=grassland, or landuse=farmland instead. Meadow is overused in OSM.HTH |
| 45686021 by RexLex88 @ 2017-01-31 13:56 | 1 | 2017-01-31 14:06 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI see you have added a pedestrian road in a park. This is not usual. In the UK we use pedestrian to show a pedestrian area in an urban location, such as a shopping area. I think highway=footway would be better.HTH |
| 2 | 2017-02-01 09:10 | RexLex88 ♦1 | Thanks for clarifying! | |
| 45683827 by amunizp @ 2017-01-31 12:29 | 1 | 2017-01-31 12:40 | chillly | You might like to connect with other GB OSM mappers to discuss this. There is a mailing list for GB https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb and an IRC channel for GB http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC |
| 2 | 2017-01-31 13:07 | amunizp ♦1 | Thanks! Just put a comment in IRC. Also put a comment on the wiki talk page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:natural%3Dtree#Subtags_to_indicate_the_significanceWhat is more active? Mailing list or IRC? | |
| 45682928 by Daiphelion @ 2017-01-31 11:50 | 1 | 2017-01-31 12:04 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI think you have tried to add multiple conflicting tags to a single area. You can only have 1 landuse tag or one leisure tag on each area. If there is a recreation ground with pitches on it, you nee to draw the pitched separately inside the rec, so you can tag them. HTH |
| 2 | 2017-01-31 12:23 | Daiphelion ♦1 | Appreciate the information, am now updating | |
| 45642232 by Dominique Job @ 2017-01-30 07:15 | 1 | 2017-01-31 10:54 | chillly | Please use a more descriptive changeset comment not just 'Add Details'. Thanks |
| 45658815 by Jacbennett @ 2017-01-30 17:41 | 1 | 2017-01-30 18:22 | chillly | You have added a car park that extends over the surrounding buildings. I will remove it. We welcome people adding new stuff, but it must be real stuff, in the right place and correctly described to be useful. |
| 45658725 by Jacbennett @ 2017-01-30 17:38 | 1 | 2017-01-30 18:20 | chillly | Welcome to OSMLooking at your edits you seem to be struggling. I wonder if you realise that you are saving to the public version of OSM. I will tidy up some of your edits - they are not useful as they are. |
| 45620151 by Fourstar Dave @ 2017-01-29 13:23 | 1 | 2017-01-29 14:43 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to be adding stuff and changing stuff to be parks, I'm guessing to attract pokémon. OSM welcomes new editors but you must be sure that stuff you add is real, in the correct place and correctly described. I will review this and your later editsIf you have q... |
| 2 | 2017-01-29 14:52 | chillly | You have added parks to the north of Kingswood that are private farmland. You have added Kingswood village green which I think is just scrubland. You have added Bude park over existing scrubland - is this really a park? | |
| 3 | 2017-01-29 17:14 | chillly | I have removed the doubled up area, and two parks that I think are not real parks. I'm not sure about the name 'Chalky Lane' - if it is the name it probably applies to the path not the park, but I'm not sure so I left it. | |
| 45620577 by Fourstar Dave @ 2017-01-29 13:41 | 1 | 2017-01-29 16:59 | chillly | You changed the area of tidal mud to be water. It is tidal mud, so at low tide it is mud and at high tide it is covered with water. It is important to know it is tidal. I have reverted (undone) your change. |
| 45623251 by Trekker3000 @ 2017-01-29 15:25 | 1 | 2017-01-29 15:34 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.There is not likely to be a meadow in a back garden, where would the sheep live?We welcome new edits but they must be real stuff in the right place and correctly described. If you need any help please feel free to ask. |
| 45620298 by Fourstar Dave @ 2017-01-29 13:29 | 1 | 2017-01-29 14:54 | chillly | Is this really a park? I think it is private land. Not every piece of green space is a park. It is important that if you add or change something it is real, in the right place and correctly described. |
| 45618428 by Hilbre @ 2017-01-29 12:04 | 1 | 2017-01-29 12:08 | chillly | You seem to have changed buildings into landuse. The landuse would normally be an area surrounding the buildings. It could include the roads and carparks etc that make up the whole retail area, like a residential area covers all the area where there are houses, gardens, roads etc.If you have que... |
| 2 | 2017-01-29 12:22 | Hilbre ♦1 | Thanks for the help, your comments are really useful & it's great to get a helping hand as I'm learning, really appreaciated. I've retro edited the areas you've mentioned, & please do keep telling me if I'm doing the wrong thing - easier to correct me before any habi... | |
| 45617813 by Hilbre @ 2017-01-29 11:38 | 1 | 2017-01-29 12:05 | chillly | Following from my last comment, 'Public Open Space' is a description, so we don't use that in a name tag. If it has no name leave it blank. If you want to show the access rights, add an access tag, such as access=publicSome of the other names similarly are not required |
| 45617997 by Hilbre @ 2017-01-29 11:46 | 1 | 2017-01-29 12:02 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.You look to have been adding lots of new stuff, thanks. I have a comment to help:The small area you have tagged as a recreation_ground with the name "Play Equipment' sounds like a playground. If so, it would be better tagged as leisure=playground. We only use names... |
| 45529182 by Saif Rehman @ 2017-01-26 21:08 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:14 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.The big park you have added looks nearly good, but it hangs over the surrounding gardens. I don't understand why you have added the second park.Pokémon edits need to be correct , accurate and real places to work. |
| 2 | 2017-01-28 20:29 | Saif Rehman ♦1 | It's because there is one big park and a smaller park inside it. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-28 20:32 | chillly | The small park looks like a playground to me. You could tag that as leisure=playground, then it would show as such. Is it called Hodge House Park too, say, on a sign? | |
| 45601870 by callum1735 @ 2017-01-28 19:20 | 1 | 2017-01-28 19:21 | chillly | I will have your account blocked unless you stop this |
| 45601783 by callum1735 @ 2017-01-28 19:17 | 1 | 2017-01-28 19:19 | chillly | Please stop deleting this school.If you think it should be deleted please reply with why. |
| 45601748 by callum1735 @ 2017-01-28 19:16 | 1 | 2017-01-28 19:17 | chillly | This is starting to look like you are deliberately causing a problem. I will revert |
| 45601644 by callum1735 @ 2017-01-28 19:12 | 1 | 2017-01-28 19:15 | chillly | Why have you added a new piece of residenital over the top of an existing piece.Please stop doodling |
| 45601540 by callum1735 @ 2017-01-28 19:07 | 1 | 2017-01-28 19:11 | chillly | The footpath you have added doubles back on itself. We draw paths and roads in sections, joining them up where needed, not doubling them up. Do you need any help sorting that path out? |
| 45601367 by callum1735 @ 2017-01-28 19:00 | 1 | 2017-01-28 19:06 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI wonder if you were trying out the editor and saved your doodles by mistake. You have deleted a school and added a single line as a park. Of course it could be that you believe the Internet and think Pokémon are scared away by schools and like parks. We like you to add ... |
| 45597213 by Robyn Parkinson @ 2017-01-28 16:28 | 1 | 2017-01-28 16:32 | chillly | Welcome to OSMWhen you say rebuilt as an M&S did you mean as a shop or another fuel station? |
| 2 | 2017-01-28 16:34 | Robyn Parkinson ♦2 | They knocked down the little shop and rebuilt it as an m&s. The fuel pumps and forecourt are the same | |
| 3 | 2017-01-28 16:36 | chillly | You have tagged the fuel station as M&S, that may be right, but you might like to add another point with a shop tag for the M&S tag. I hope I've understood. If you need help, please feel free to ask | |
| 45595609 by dmarshall88 @ 2017-01-28 15:32 | 1 | 2017-01-28 15:37 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a new park which is a duplicate of the Fordbridge Park. I will remove the new duplicate |
| 45594978 by Romulus_Tiberius @ 2017-01-28 15:09 | 1 | 2017-01-28 15:16 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have changed something named as Compton Terrace Gardens from being tagged as a garden to a park. Is this really true, or are you changing things to attract Pokémon? We want your edits but please add real stuff in the right place and described properly. |
| 2 | 2017-01-28 15:24 | Romulus_Tiberius ♦1 | I don't play pokemon. But English is also not my first language, and after just googling the difference between park and garden I tend to think that is more of a park then a garden. There's nowhere near enough plants or flowering plants to make it a garden, but at the same time maybe it�... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-28 15:27 | chillly | OK, I accept your choice. We are seeing lots of new mappers simply adding parks to play a game, that's why I asked. I hope you find more detail to add in your area. | |
| 4 | 2017-01-28 17:54 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hello Compton Terrace Gardens are actually gardens, they happen to be used like a park. That's why they are called and signed as gardens. Originally they were for the private use of people living in the terrace's, please see :- http://www.londongardensonline.org.uk/gardens-online-record.as... | |
| 45595213 by Le007n @ 2017-01-28 15:17 | 1 | 2017-01-28 15:22 | chillly | You have added a park. Is it really there? It certainly covers gardens and even houses. Please be more accurate drawing stuff. Please only add real stuff in its proper place and properly described. |
| 45595073 by Le007n @ 2017-01-28 15:12 | 1 | 2017-01-28 15:19 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a park over the top of an existing pitch and putt area. We welcome your changes, but please only add real stuff in their proper place and properly described.Would you like me to remove your extra park? |
| 45593515 by Jakestephenson9 @ 2017-01-28 14:20 | 1 | 2017-01-28 14:24 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have been trying out the editor and saved the doodle. Would you like me to clean up the doodle for you? |
| 2 | 2017-01-28 14:26 | Jakestephenson9 ♦2 | what is a doodle | |
| 3 | 2017-01-28 14:31 | chillly | The park (the Batts) you drew is not a sensible area, it has lines crossing each other and looks a mess. It will not stay on the map as it is. | |
| 4 | 2017-01-28 14:53 | Jakestephenson9 ♦2 | In which case can you clean it up please | |
| 5 | 2017-01-28 15:00 | chillly | I've removed the overlaps and tried to estimate the eastern end of the park. If I got that wrong you might like to adjust it.If you have questions about OSM please feel free to ask | |
| 45593757 by Jakestephenson9 @ 2017-01-28 14:28 | 1 | 2017-01-28 14:43 | chillly | Is this for real, or are you just attracting pokémon? |
| 2 | 2017-01-28 14:52 | Jakestephenson9 ♦2 | this is for real. There is an area of land called the ghyll, after the street, which is a park and is usually used for dog walking. I have no idea why this was included inside the golf course as there is barbed ire indicating the start of the golf course after the ghyll | |
| 3 | 2017-01-28 14:53 | chillly | OK, Thanks for the detail | |
| 45594138 by Ezen Scopy @ 2017-01-28 14:42 | 1 | 2017-01-28 14:50 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.What sort of shelters are these? Bus shelters? If you have any questions please feel free to ask. |
| 45593927 by MrPolitical @ 2017-01-28 14:34 | 1 | 2017-01-28 14:40 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added something with a name but you have not added any info about what it is. Is it a shop, an office, a tourism business ... ? It will display much better with the right description. You can address details too so people can find it. |
| 45576006 by 8bitdip @ 2017-01-27 21:53 | 1 | 2017-01-27 21:55 | chillly | Hmmm, really a path? We don't draw paths next to roads, we use the sidewalk tag. |
| 45575898 by 8bitdip @ 2017-01-27 21:48 | 1 | 2017-01-27 21:51 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIt looks as though you were trying out the editor and save your doodles by mistake. I'll delete your doodle for you. If you want to add stuff please make sure it is a real thing, in the right place and correctly described. |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 21:53 | chillly | Looking again, the paths are there, but your edit overlaps multiple paths which looks a muddle. How would you like to sort this out? | |
| 45575735 by Notnearlyelite @ 2017-01-27 21:42 | 1 | 2017-01-27 21:45 | chillly | You have added a strange footpath here. Please make sure you add real stuff, at the right place and correctly described. I will delete this path. |
| 45575676 by Notnearlyelite @ 2017-01-27 21:40 | 1 | 2017-01-27 21:44 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have changed Murden way to be footpath. Is this a mistake? |
| 45575647 by swakes @ 2017-01-27 21:39 | 1 | 2017-01-27 21:41 | chillly | Please don't add footpath along roads. Use the sidewalk tag on the road. |
| 45575582 by swakes @ 2017-01-27 21:36 | 1 | 2017-01-27 21:39 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIt looks like you were trying the editor and you saved your doodles. I'll delete your doodles for you. If you want to add stuff, please make sure it is a real thing, in the right place and described properly. |
| 45575193 by lizzyc @ 2017-01-27 21:20 | 1 | 2017-01-27 21:23 | chillly | Your edit looks a bit muddled. The area crosses itself (never good) and there's no tags to describe what it is. If you area trying to add a carpark (as per your comment) you need to add a carpark tag. If you need help, feel free to ask. |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 21:26 | lizzyc ♦1 | Hi I'm very new to this lol I was just trying too add a wooded area that has now been open to the public alongside the golf course and a car parking area I'm just a little unsure of what I'm doing | |
| 3 | 2017-01-27 21:31 | chillly | I suggest you zoom right in, draw the area as carefully as you can, (they are a bit crude at the moment, and then type in the search box , e.g. wood and select the thing it suggest. If it has a name add that. I would delete the car park and try again. To delete click the line and then the dustbin ap... | |
| 4 | 2017-01-27 21:33 | lizzyc ♦1 | ok thanks for the help | |
| 45575142 by lizzyc @ 2017-01-27 21:18 | 1 | 2017-01-27 21:21 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a couple of areas, but there are no tags to describe what they are. What were you trying to add? |
| 45574890 by subzero598 @ 2017-01-27 21:10 | 1 | 2017-01-27 21:15 | chillly | Welcome to OSMIt looks like you were trying the editor and saved your testing doodles. I'll delete the doodles for you. If you have any question please fell free to ask. |
| 45573486 by the_b1ues @ 2017-01-27 20:30 | 1 | 2017-01-27 20:35 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the new detail. I would suggest you alter it slightly to match the outline of the green space. Since this is called Ashley Rec, is it a recreation ground rater than a park. If so please consider changing it. We like to have real things in the right place, properly describ... |
| 45573320 by ImJimWeb @ 2017-01-27 20:26 | 1 | 2017-01-27 20:28 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a park over the top of a house. Please only add real things in the real place correctly described. I will delete this imaginary park and path |
| 45572487 by housezebra @ 2017-01-27 19:56 | 1 | 2017-01-27 20:03 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have tried to add a park, but there isn't really a park there is there? Please only add real stuff in its proper place properly described. If you have questions please feel free to ask. |
| 45572270 by pep007 @ 2017-01-27 19:47 | 1 | 2017-01-27 19:59 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the detail. You have added a park and called it 'nature reserve'. If it is a nature reserve (and not just the name of the park) you could mark it as a nature reserve rather than a park. They are not the same thing. You may be tagging to attract Pokém... |
| 2 | 2017-01-28 21:30 | cartolinguaphile ♦11 | Here are the wiki pages for the two:http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dparkhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserveIt's important to note that the name= tag is just meant for actual names, not descriptions.Also, in the few months I've been m... | |
| 45571306 by Jak-ahmed @ 2017-01-27 19:16 | 1 | 2017-01-27 19:20 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Thanks for the edit. You have drawn paths in quite a small space. I wonder if others would recognise the paths, or is the whole area just a pedestrian area? |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 19:28 | Jak-ahmed ♦1 | HiIt's a residential area and so i have the added the paths as it maps around the parking lot. Hope it helps. Thanks | |
| 3 | 2017-01-27 19:29 | chillly | Thanks, It all helps. If you have questions please feel free to ask. | |
| 45569858 by jlrdz1 @ 2017-01-27 18:27 | 1 | 2017-01-27 18:32 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.I think you have been testing editing, but you saved your doodles. I will delete them. If you want to add things to OSM, they need to be real things in the proper place. It you need help please ask |
| 45569668 by jnoyes001 @ 2017-01-27 18:21 | 1 | 2017-01-27 18:27 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.You seem to have added a park over the top of houses and roads. I intend to delete it - there is no park there. If you want to add things to OSM, they need to be real things in the proper place. It you need help please ask |
| 45530667 by DonBelfit @ 2017-01-26 21:36 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:44 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.You have added Limeside park over the top of a recreation ground. You have changed Coalshaw Green into a park when it is a recreation ground. Do you need any help cleaning these up?Pokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to work. |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 16:09 | DonBelfit ♦1 | Hi there, Curious to how you mean "cleaning these up"? I assume that there being football pitches and tennis courts on these parks is causing some sort of conflict?Any help would be appreciated, I only added/changed those two parks as that's what they are to the local area.Thanks | |
| 3 | 2017-01-27 16:17 | chillly | Maybe the names are not clear. A recreation ground is an area of green space with sports pitches on it. A park is an area of green space. You added a green space over a green space. That was what I thought you might like to tidy up. The pitches are fine in a park or a rec. I suspect you want to maxi... | |
| 4 | 2017-01-27 17:38 | DonBelfit ♦1 | It's entirely up to yourself to delete what you feel is inappropriate. | |
| 5 | 2017-01-27 18:19 | chillly | You have sorted out Limeside Park, thanks. I will leave the other park as a park not a rec - your choice is based on your knowledge and that is always very useful.Happy mapping | |
| 45561077 by Spazbadger @ 2017-01-27 14:28 | 1 | 2017-01-27 15:37 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Thanks for the details. In Rawcliff Bridge you seem to have added a small park within the area of a recreation ground? Did you mean to do that? |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 16:47 | Spazbadger ♦1 | Hi, and thanks :) Its a playground/kids park that is fenced off. I wasn't 100% "park" was the right thing to class it as but it is different to the rest of the surrounding area. (hope that makes sense!) | |
| 3 | 2017-01-27 17:06 | chillly | There is a tag for a playground (leisure=playground). That would be better I think.Are you Pokémon hunting? There have been a lot of new editors adding parks, footpath and water to attract pokémon, but no one is sure if Niantic are actually loading this new data or just using an ol... | |
| 4 | 2017-01-28 13:03 | Spazbadger ♦1 | Ah i see! I've changed it now to playground.Ha ha, is it that obvious ;) Yes, i'm hoping it means more Pokemon spawns in an otherwise pretty empty area. But if not, as you say the map benefits anyway :) | |
| 45532611 by Jaaaarm @ 2017-01-26 22:21 | 1 | 2017-01-26 22:37 | chillly | These doodles have been deleted. You doodles have cost volunteers time to check and correct. Please don't add anymore made up stuff. Pokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to work. |
| 45532769 by P1869275 @ 2017-01-26 22:25 | 1 | 2017-01-26 22:35 | chillly | Welcome to OSMI see you have added a path. You should probably join it to Rufus Close, which may need nudging to a more accurate place.Joining up will make router on phones work better.Pokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to work. |
| 45532478 by Jaaaarm @ 2017-01-26 22:17 | 1 | 2017-01-26 22:21 | chillly | Why have you made this vandalism? let me guess, you're a Pokémon seeker.If you made any more junk edits I will block your accountPokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to work. |
| 45532345 by snowblink @ 2017-01-26 22:14 | 1 | 2017-01-26 22:17 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.The path you have added probably joins to the Balaclava road. If you join it to the road it will help routers work better for pedestrians. |
| 45531610 by pizzadog0123 @ 2017-01-26 21:55 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:56 | chillly | Why have you added a park over a park, I wonder. Could it be an effort to attract Pokémon? Pokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to work.I will delete this junk |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 22:00 | pizzadog0123 ♦1 | Correct me if I'm wrong but it's not marked as a park right? I mean my edit is a Pokemon get but I'm happy to contribute correct additions. If it's correct what's the problem man. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-26 22:03 | chillly | It is marked as a park, with some other stuff too. If you want to add the name you can add it to the existing park, which covers a bigger area than your addition.Sorry to be short we are completely overrun with Pokémon edits, many of which are utter junk. None of the junk edits will help ... | |
| 4 | 2017-01-26 22:04 | chillly | We are all volunteers and we value the OSM map a lot, we are pretty upset about the junk edits. | |
| 5 | 2017-01-26 22:11 | pizzadog0123 ♦1 | Haha, I can see you're pretty upset. I think OSM is amazing & we're all lucky to have people working together on it. On a second look I saw the huge park area that's already there. Sorry for the 'junk edits', I just suck at Pokemon. | |
| 6 | 2017-01-26 22:12 | chillly | Thanks, good luck. | |
| 45532049 by StokeBuccaneer @ 2017-01-26 22:06 | 1 | 2017-01-26 22:09 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Thanks for the detail. You could add all the detail you describe in your comment as details if you want to. |
| 45531854 by Nwillowsrough @ 2017-01-26 22:00 | 1 | 2017-01-26 22:08 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the edit. You need to add amenity=fuel to mark the object as a fuel station. It probably isn't called 'Petrol Station', so changing the name to the name that is displayed on the business would be good too.HTH |
| 2 | 2017-01-29 16:55 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | I have tagged this from memory, will check sometime or NWillowsrough can confirm.Cheers Phil | |
| 45531900 by Peeekay @ 2017-01-26 22:01 | 1 | 2017-01-26 22:06 | chillly | What are you doing here.Pokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to work.This is junk and will be deleted. We are watching your edits |
| 45531513 by skihadi @ 2017-01-26 21:52 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:59 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have drawn an area and added park and grass. This is not needed, just park would be fine.Pokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to work. |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 22:29 | skihadi ♦1 | Thanks, I forgot to delete grass. Updated accordingly | |
| 45531417 by pizzadog0123 @ 2017-01-26 21:50 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:54 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.I see you have tried to add a footpath beside a road. highway=pedestrian (that you have added) is not right. A pedestrian road is a road converted from car use to pedestrian use in, say, a shopping area. If you want a footpath beside the road use sidewalk tags for the road. This a... |
| 45531171 by Bricey @ 2017-01-26 21:46 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:52 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Have you added a park that doesn't really exist to try to attract Pokémon? The 'park' seem to over the top of people's gardens, or am I wrong?Pokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to work. |
| 2 | 2017-12-02 11:52 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Reverted | |
| 45531116 by 2P4E @ 2017-01-26 21:45 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:46 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.You have added a footway through the new park, thanks. You need to join the path to the roads around the park to make routing to work for pedestrians, especially if you want this to work with Pokémon.Pokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to w... |
| 45530382 by FondueFEET @ 2017-01-26 21:30 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:32 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.The church you have traced is a good thing to add. The tip for tracing when the photo is not directly above is to expect te building to be right-angled corners and imaging the floor plan even where you can't see it. HTH |
| 45529709 by joeribbons @ 2017-01-26 21:18 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:25 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.You have changed stuff to be parks that I might use other tags for. E.g. Hornley Harriers looks like a recreation ground, not a park. Hepworth Recreation ground is a recreation ground not a park. Pokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to work. |
| 45529573 by SpiltMilk87 @ 2017-01-26 21:16 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:21 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Thanks for the detail. I wonder why you added Swanspool Gardens in two parts?If they really are gardens and not a park you can tag it as leisure=garden with access tags such as access=public.If you have questions please feel free to ask |
| 45528640 by alexw22 @ 2017-01-26 20:57 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:04 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.Please don't add bits and bobs all over the world in one go. Looking at the paths you have added I question if they are real or just wandering routes you have taken. We only add stuff that someone else would be able to see if they visited.Pokémon edits need to be cor... |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 21:16 | chillly | THe more I look the less I like this. I'm going to revert this edit. | |
| 45529047 by screading @ 2017-01-26 21:05 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:11 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.You seem to have added a pond that fills someone's garden. Is this really correct?Pokémon edits need to be correct , accurate and real places to work. |
| 45529062 by goalkingcol @ 2017-01-26 21:05 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:09 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a highway pedestrian. This is normally a a road for cars that has been converted to a pedestrian road in, say, a town. I would use highway=footway, a normal footpath. If you have questions, please feel free to ask. |
| 45528716 by wogna @ 2017-01-26 20:59 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:01 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou have added a line across the stream, but you need to add tags to describe it. I would use highway=footway, bridge=yesHTH |
| 45527603 by Duroode @ 2017-01-26 20:39 | 1 | 2017-01-26 20:44 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThe park you have drawn is a bit crude, it strays over the gardens of Kinnell Road.Pokémon edits need to be correct, accurate and real places to work. |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 20:56 | Duroode ♦1 | There are no houses on that part of Kinneil Road, on the place i have Selected, is part of the park , with Pigeon huts. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-26 20:58 | chillly | Ok, Thanks for confirming.If you have questions about OSM, please feel free to ask. | |
| 4 | 2017-01-26 20:59 | Duroode ♦1 | Will do, Thanks for the Support. | |
| 5 | 2017-01-26 21:34 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Hi, I've fixed the paths that you added beside Lyon Court - I've connected them to the road so that routing software can direct users along them. I also added a couple of bowling greens that I saw - perhaps you could add the pavilion building and club name if you know it? | |
| 45528477 by TDABLFC @ 2017-01-26 20:54 | 1 | 2017-01-26 20:57 | chillly | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a footpath over the top of a road. We usually do not add footpaths like that. If a road has a path next to it we add sidewalk tags to the road. This makes phone and satnav routers for pedestrians work better.If you need any help sorting this out please ask. |
| 45528029 by Victor Frankenstein @ 2017-01-26 20:46 | 1 | 2017-01-26 20:49 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.You seem to have made a bit of a jumble here. Do you need any help sorting it out? |
| 45527802 by Alastair Riddle @ 2017-01-26 20:42 | 1 | 2017-01-26 20:46 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the details.You can enclose the pitches you have drawn in an area tagged as, say, a recreation ground.It might have a name too.If you have questions, feel free to ask |
| 45526918 by DarkAbyssKeeper @ 2017-01-26 20:25 | 1 | 2017-01-26 20:40 | chillly | I doubt the chippy is out front of the building. I'd move it over the building it is in. |
| 45527019 by LeeJBolger @ 2017-01-26 20:27 | 1 | 2017-01-26 20:35 | chillly | Welcome to OSMThanks for the edit. You have doubled the path back over itself. It needs to be drawn as two separate paths that join. Pokémon edits need to be correct , accurate and real places to work. |
| 45526770 by MapEditerOliver @ 2017-01-26 20:21 | 1 | 2017-01-26 20:31 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.I see you have added some strange paths to the map. The spiral path in the park may be a route you took, but is that really a clear path that someone else would be able to follow?You have also added a path besides a road. We don't add footpaths like that. If the road has ... |
| 45526760 by Burdenaru @ 2017-01-26 20:21 | 1 | 2017-01-26 20:26 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.I see you have added the footpath beside the road. We normally only add the pat separately if the path is really separate from the road with something between. If the path is just next to the road we add sidewalk=left or right or both to the road.This makes routing by phone an... |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 10:42 | blackadder ♦51 | reverted changeset | |
| 45526642 by Waddlepip @ 2017-01-26 20:18 | 1 | 2017-01-26 20:23 | chillly | Welcome to OSM.The Edward st park looks to be where a house is. Is that OK?You have added a path with a name 'New Steine'. We only add names that are really the name of the object. The name looks to be the park name not the path name. Are you sure the path has that name?If you ... |