| Changeset |
No. |
Date |
Contributor |
Comment |
|
| 48126794 | chadbunn | Thank you. |
| chadbunn | This area has been verified and the dog park can be seen on Mapillary. |
|
| 48101990 | chadbunn | How do you know this is fictional? I live here and will verify, but want to know how you were able to determine its authenticity. |
| dannykath | Hey there ! Chadbunn I have reverted my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48126794 |
|
| 48101874 | chillly | Why did you delete the pond? There is a pond there, not quite where the new mapper put it, but that's a newbie mistake. Does it really deserve to be deleted? I think this is heavy-handed |
| dannykath | Hi Chilly, I deleted this pond based on Satellite imagery, because it does not show clearly, but I will revert my changeset if this is convenient for you. |
| dannykath | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48126491 |
|
| 47943165 | vramirez122000 | Hello. What was the purpose of this revert? |
| dannykath | Hey there! I maked a mistake, i wanted delete 2 parks that do not show up in satellite imagery.Thanks for your comment, I have reverted my changeset Sorry for the confusion and thanks for flagging this. Best Danny |
|
| 45900273 | PierZen | Voies temporaires lors de travaux routiers ne doivent pas etre ajoutées comme bretelles d'autoroute.Road maintenance temporary lines should not be added as motorway links. |
| dannykath | Hi PierZen, i will revert my changeset ,thanks for your comment! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47054005 |
|
| 46572815 | FTA | Hi dannykath,Is this the only changeset of rimantsjana that you reverted? I am trying to remove all the fictitious edits but am getting a few conflicts for some that have been reverted--it'd be a great help to know which ones have already been done.Best,Ethan aka FTA with the DWG |
| dannykath | Hi Ethan, I reverted around 17 changesets from this user, I think cause more conflicts , if you have any question, please can you write me again ?Regards Danny |
| FTA | Thanks, Danny--good to know. It looks like some other people have reverted other changes too. So I am going to check each object and make sure at least someone else has touched them since the original edits.Thanks!Ethan |
|
| 46525001 | dannykath | Sorry for my bing changeset, i was validating a big changeset , I will be more careful |
|
| 45728780 | dchiles | Why were the two buildings along Park Avenue deleted? Related: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/878198http://osmcha.mapbox.com/45728780/ |
| dannykath | Hi thanks for pointing this out, I'm not sure how this happened, however I will add those buildings again. Regards. |
| dannykath | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45756249 |
| dchiles | 👍🏻 |
|
| 45488007 | oba510 | Did you mean to remove the name when you deleted and re-drew this building? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/348756169 |
| dannykath | Hi, Thanks for your comment , sorry for my mistake, I have fixed my changeset .http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45514015 |
|
| 45274871 | oba510 | Hi, you've added a couple of ways in a parking lot, but tagged them as highway=residential. In general, these should be tagged as highway=service with appropriate service=* tags (eg: service=parking_aisle for parking aisles) |
| dannykath | Hey there!Thank you for bringing this issue to my notice. I didn't realize about the commercial buildings that are around this area, so I retagged the highways. Thanks again! |
|
| 44901044 | nvk | Looks like a bad relations edit that turned the old `natural=wood` tag into a `landuse=reservoir` tag, resulting in a huge lake showing up where before it was forest? |
| nvk | New name to that effect was also added, probably around 38.7229602,-120.5654347. Maybe an unsuccessful polygon punch? |
| nvk | Attempt to fix in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45069739 |
| dannykath | Hey there ! Thanks for your fix , I will be more careful . |
| nvk | No worries :) It was really confusing in iD to fix this, the user flow there is not intuitive – and I think I would have made the same edit funky edit and 2nd round of fixing!I had to know ahead of time there was a rendering bug in iD, and know that by creating another relation for th... |
|
| 41803382 | pnorman | When I was last here, the road was oneway. Has this changed? |
| dannykath | Hi Excuse me for the late reply, yes you are right , i have fixed my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44855226Thanks for your review |
|
| 42506503 | Littlebtc | Refined:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42519296 |
| dannykath | thanks for your correction, I will be more careful |
|
| 32614876 | Paul_012 | This changeset has been reverted because it removed correct data. |
| dannykath | Hey there , thanks for your correction! |
|
| 38600444 | d1g | Very timely response and well commented! Thank you for the feedback!I always count self-reverts as constructive edits. It is clear that person cares about correct data more than big edit counts and 0 validation warnings :)Please tell new users to use noexit=yes tags. Many of us weren't u... |
| dannykath | thanks for your comment, I will do |
|
| 44014136 | nevw | HiThere is no way between Pinevale Place and Woodlight Street, except by the footway.The tool 'Connecting motorable roads using #to-fix' is not always correct and only a guide that there 'may' be a problem and on satellite imagery it looks like there may be a block too. The driveways do not joi... |
| dannykath | Hey there! thanks for your correction!Best regards Danny |
| dannykath | Hey there! thanks for your correction!Best regards Danny |
|
| 42327173 | DavidKewley | It seems clear to me that deleting the oneway=yes tag from Lion Country as was done here is NOT the right way to fix whatever To-Fix was flagging as an error. Looking at the traffic flow, the sections of Lion Country from Irvine Center to Meadows Way are clearly one-way (one heading in was mis-edite... |
| dannykath | Hey there David , I fixing a changeset, please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42376732 for more details , thanks for your comment ! |
| DavidKewley | Thank you for the adjustment! Looks as reasonably good as we can do without a survey. Also, this is an event (e.g. concert) parking lot area for Irvine Meadows Ampitheatre, so I bet its use varies a lot. The ampitheatre is planned to close after this fall, and apartments will be built here, so proba... |
| DavidKewley | Thank you! This is good enough given that it is a parking area for a concert ampitheatre that will close after this fall and be turned into apartments. |
|
| 42299430 | Borut@OSM | Hi Danny! In this particular case it can, but must not be correct. The previous version was obviously not OK, but I suspect that maybe the street is partly one way - maybe up to the crossing. However, I do not have local knowledge and have not consulted imagery yet. Regards, Borut |
| dannykath | Hey Borut! thanks for your comment, I have reverted my changeset and I have also left a note instead |
|
| 42183064 | Nakaner | http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=609026#p609026 |
| dannykath | Thanks for your fixing , I will be more careful |
|
| 40745669 | SomeoneElse | Hi,Please try and restrict changeset size to at least less than one continent. Other mappers have mentioned this before (e.g. on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39069408) but its still happening.Also, please do use meaningful changeset comments - "Closing broken polygons" and s... |
| dannykath | I do not know why exactly this happens. It may happen when my internet connection is having connectivity issues. I will be careful when I am seeing network issues, and try to observe the exact cause. |
|
| 39934579 | mattchn | The lane count (lanes=5) was correct, the mistake was in the count of forward and backward lanes. I have changed this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327095053/history |
| dannykath | Thanks for your review ! |
|
| 39069408 | trigpoint | HiI have commented on one of you changesets on this same issue before, but you did not respond.Please keep your changes to sensible areas, close and start a new changeset for each area, for example this one should be a minimum of four separate changesets.Large areas such as this make review by... |
| dannykath | Hello Phill, I'll be more careful , thanks for your comment. |
| SomeoneElse | Please don't just say "I'll be more careful" and then just carry on as normal the very next day, as you did in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39105735 .If you're connecting two roads, such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302319853 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226723... |
| SomeoneElse | This is still happening. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40745669 . |
| dannykath | Hello Andy, It could happen because I had internet connection issues yesterday. |
|
| 39935083 | mattchn | Please check with Bing imagery, the current representation seems wrong. Maybe wrong forward/backward tags? |
| dannykath | Hey there, thanks four your feedback ! I have already fix the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40264382 |
|
| 39935935 | rickmastfan67 | There was NOTHING wrong here. The 'none' part is there to indicate there is a lane splitting into 2 lanes from one. Taking out the 'none' tells everybody to go to the left into the brand new lane. Please look at the satellite imagery before editing and look at adjacent ways too. This is ruining ... |
| dannykath | Hey there!, Thanks for your comment , I have reverted this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39944269 |
|
| 39132667 | FTA | Hi, is there any way you can confine edits across the world to separate changesets? It's difficult see what exactly was changed when the bbox covers nearly all longitudes. |
| dannykath | Hey! I was fixing short issues. However, I think because of the internet speed issue, I could have mistaken some layers. I will be careful next time. Thanks for your feedback |
|
| 39108650 | rickmastfan67 | Is it possible that you could try to keep these types of changesets limited to one continent or even smaller areas? It makes it sometimes impossible for local mappers to double check if your changes are correct since the OSM RSS feeds give any changeset that has a bounding box that enters a smaller ... |
| dannykath | Hey there , I do not know happened exactly , but I will be more careful, Thanks for your comment |
|
| 39043844 | SomeoneElse | While " Fixing major highways that overlap with minor highways" does explain what you were changing it doesn't say where, or what the source was, and this changeset is huge! |
| dannykath | hello Andy , I do not know happened exactly, but I'll be more careful. |
|
| 39083925 | rickmastfan67 | Please make smaller changesets. When changesets span accross the ocean, the bounding box it creates makes it hard to keep track of local changes in my area with my RSS feed of changesets, even if nothing was changed in my local area. If you need to do big changesets like this, please limit them to... |
| dannykath | Hello! thanks for your comment, I'll be more careful |
|
| 38951616 | trigpoint | Please keep your changes within sensible areas, large areas such as this make peer review by local mapper very difficult.Thanks Phil |
| dannykath | Hello Phill, I'll be more careful , thanks for your comment. |
|
| 38477263 | LLlypuk82 | Please, do not create a common node, it is a feature for correct routing. |
| dannykath | I'll be more careful, thanks for your feedback. |
|
| 26634400 | naoliv | You have duplicated some nodes (and then some boundaries were left unclosed) in this changeset. It's good to validate the data with JOSM before uploading it. |
| dannykath_labuildings | thanks for yoru comment Naoliv, I'll be careful |
| dannykath | thanks for your comment Naoliv. I'll be more careful |
|
| 38569721 | mavl | Hello. Please, give me one good reason why two roads are connected? |
| dannykath | Thanks for your feedback, I think these ways should be interesected so i did it , but I've already reverted this changeset , more details in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38600444 |
| mavl | Thank you for revert. These two roads have no common points. The first road [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26723955] is on the ground. The second road [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376193872] is on an embankment (there is a bridge). The embankment has height about 4 meters. A person can... |
|
| 37876267 | Владимир К | Hello!I see, you added nodes 4055312665 4055312664 and so on.They are right for validator, but they make routing wrong.For examplehttp://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74396%2C52.39203%3B55.74417%2C52.39199http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_c... |
| dannykath | Hello! Thanks for your feedback!I think it's necessary to connect those major highways, I've already reverted my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38384184 |
|
| 36682860 | Harry Cutts | Nice work! FYI, I had to manually revert your changes to Reflection Way and its buildings (changeset 36907072), as the Bing imagery is out of date in that location. The buildings shown have since been demolished and replaced. |
| dannykath | Hey Harry,Thanks for contributing and fixing those demolished buildings. |
|
| 31638424 | SomeoneElse | Did you mention the "problem" that you fixed here to either SK53 or will_p who were the previous mappers of the ways concerned? Given that they're both on-the-ground mappers I'd be very surprised if the previous situation was incorrect. Perhaps rather than diving in and trying to "f... |
| dannykath | Hello ! I have reverted this changeset , thanks for your comment. I will be more careful |
| dannykath | Hi, I was working with the tool unconnected minor, which is to add intersections of streets, in this case lacked the streets intersect, I intersected, thanks for your comment, next time ask you local mappers first |
| dannykath | Please to see more details about unconnected minor https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/106 |
|
| 35319008 | dannykath | (https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/8483644/11184647/e0f9a4c6-8c46-11e5-8f21-cf370f2b1870.png) |
|
| 33101616 | SomeoneElse | Would it be possible to describe what the "impossible angle" was before here? http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=33101616 doesn't really show a lot of difference. The resulting roundabout still looks a bit overnoded and too big for the imagery. |
| dannykath | Hello! I Have reverted this changeset, please to see more details please follow here http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33186281 |
|
| 33186281 | SomeoneElse | Thanks - that looks much more like the right size. |
| dannykath | Thanks for your comment. |
|
| 32476765 | skorasaurus | Hi, these roads don't go as far you've edited them. I've driven past them numerous times. I had them at the correct length in an earlier version and now fixed them in this changeset.http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34932290 |
| dannykath | Hello! Thanks for updating the information about this way. |
|
| 32743999 | GerdP | please review:Bing shows very nice roads here |
| dannykath | Hello , thanks for your review, i changed this tag , please review this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34701334.GreetingsDanny |
| GerdP | thanks for the reply. I think surface isasphalt, not grass? |
| dannykath | Hello, I changed this tag , see this changesethttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34758569 |
|
| 34329785 | ikiya | Please stop mass editing.Please explain what you are doing for Japan OSM community. |
| dannykath | Hello Ikiya, thanks for your feedback , I am aligning major roads (primary, secondary, trunk) based on GIS Imagery ort (http://cyberjapandata.gsi.go.jp/xyz/ort/{z}/{x}/{y}.jpg |
| pnorman | There's nothing wrong with improving alignment, but before continuing this large-scale edit, can you communicate with the Japanese community on the talk-ja@ list about what you'd like to do, and seek their feedback?Paul NormanFor the Data Working Group |
| ikiya | Thanks for your comment.Today there was a detailed explanation about the cleanup project.(Japan Community mailing lists)https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2015-September/009083.html |
| dannykath | Hello Ikiya, thanks for your feedback @planemad told me he has been in touch, I am aligning major roads (primary, secondary, trunk) - details here - https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/120 |
|
| 34235143 | Rub21 | Test, podría responder este mensaje ni bien lo reciba.Gracias. |
| dannykath | ya :) |
|
| 32679643 | Yorvik Prestigitator | Why have you removed the oneway tag?? This is the exit from the service station forecourt and motorists are not allowed to enter the forecourt via this way as indicated by local signage. |
| dannykath | Hi, I am sorry, I reverted this changeset |
| Yorvik Prestigitator | Thank you :) |
|
| 32550147 | ij_ | Please don't remove oneway=yes just like that or did you visit the place and checked that it really is a dead-end? You're very likely wrong even if you might have tried to interpret imagery. My guess (non-verified on ground) is that one can drive around that building below the upper loading/parking ... |
| dannykath | Hello! I am sorry, I'll be careful to next time |
|
| 32080181 | zeromap | Hi, dannykath! Thanks for your interest in improving OpenStreetMap. You've changed the type of way that I've verified using local knowledge and a ground survey. A good practice is to check the history of an object, especially if you are making changes based on aerial imagery and not a ground survey.... |
| dannykath | Thanks for your review, zeromap! |