59 changesets created by DannyAiquipa have been discussed with 55 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
43174870
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-10-25 20:39
12021-06-09 05:52Ficky IRM-ED
♦131
Hi DannyAiquipa,
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/449449163) based on maxar premium. I also made some changes around this changeset.
Thank you, happy mapping!
39913347
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-06-09 17:22
12019-06-06 06:51skquinn
♦804
This changeset appears to have deleted a lot of previously added lane count/lane use information, while copying the same comment from the changeset that added it. It is really frustrating to only find this three years later. Please be more careful when mapping, particularly in Houston, in the future...
44015509
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-11-28 19:17
12019-02-28 03:09siripurapu
♦15
"Hi farras,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 437494173 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to inconsiste...
60419284
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2018-07-04 21:06
12018-10-26 17:12Dr Udo Brömme
♦23
danny, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605081594 is not a generator! generators produce electricity and only present to power plants.
22018-10-26 22:13DannyAiquipa Hi Dr Udo Brömme, thanks for fis this issue.
Regards,
Danny
60356264
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2018-07-02 18:50
12018-07-24 16:52AkuAnakTimur
♦455
Hi. Is this an error, where an industrial park is mapped as a leisure=park?
22018-07-24 17:25DannyAiquipa Hi, yes It was my mistake, I fixed in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61031487
Thanks for your feedback
Regards .
Danny
53251269
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-10-26 03:12
12018-05-10 20:26carciofo
♦186
Hi, can you specify the source for this turn restriction? There is a turning lane on the left, so something is wrong... Thanks in advance for the info
56834826
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2018-03-02 22:54
12018-03-04 17:16PierZen
♦262
To display HV Power lines on infrastructure maps such as OpenInfraMap, voltage should be added.
49573511
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-06-15 20:18
12018-02-23 12:41zaizone
♦63
Hi dannykath ! I've seen that you tagged some of my contributions as a bad edits in OSMCHA and reverted it. This node has been deleted because there was a duplicate of that town, see :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3300965576
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/921507120
Could you pleas...
49573573
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-06-15 20:21
12018-02-23 12:39zaizone
♦63
Hi dannykath ! I've seen that you tagged some of my contributions as a bad edits in OSMCHA and reverted it. This node has been deleted because there was a duplicate of that town, see :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3300968250
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/921563456
Could you pleas...
49282798
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-06-05 18:38
12017-12-10 13:03Sylwke3100
♦1
Why, if the bus stop location is wrong?
22017-12-10 13:06Sylwke3100
♦1
Please look https://rj.kzkgop.com.pl/mapa/160759/
51437213
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-08-25 15:01
12017-09-27 11:08carciofo
♦186
Hi, regarding the cross-over segments on I-75 which you and other Mapbox mappers are adding, please note that access=permissive is not correct for these segments. They are signed "emergency vehicles only" which goes against the definition of permissive, which implies that access has been g...
22017-11-30 14:26dannykath_peruimport
♦2
Hi Carcifofo, thanks for flagging this, I deleted my changes, thanks for your comment!
32017-11-30 14:50DannyAiquipa
Hi Carcifofo, thanks for flagging this, I deleted my changes, thanks for your comment!
42017-11-30 14:51DannyAiquipa Sorry for my double comment, I used my wrong account!
49148167
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-05-31 21:56
12017-11-05 11:45Sanniu
♦569
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320363804 - look like you created zigzagged, self-intersection road here, can it be fixed/reverted?
22017-11-05 16:31SafwatHalaby
♦622
This is partially the fault of the bus stop update. Changeset 49148167 glued stops to the road, and yesterday the bot bus stop update moved those stops, dragging the road along with it. I've fixed this here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53532857
32017-11-05 16:54SafwatHalaby
♦622
Forum post:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=671314#p671314
Fixing entire Israel:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53533478
42017-11-05 17:52SafwatHalaby
♦622
Entire list of fix changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53532857
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53532932
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53533478
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53533734
52017-11-06 05:41SafwatHalaby
♦622
...and:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53539624
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53545146
51236785
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-08-18 15:30
12017-08-27 11:12mueschel
♦6,568
Hi,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7484856
Is this a restrictions for cars higher than the given value? Then it should be
... @ height > 13'6"
We're referring to the actual size of the vehicle, not a restriction like 'maxheight'.

Cheers, Jan
22017-08-27 16:19DannyAiquipa Hi, mueschel! Thank you for you attentiveness. Of course, in this case it is forbidden to drive cars higher than 13'6'', not equal to 13'6''.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7484856
I fixed TR according to you comment. Best regards Danny
44601324
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-12-22 20:58
12017-08-04 11:36Paul_012
♦112
I've reverted this edit. A motorway passing through a toll booth is obviously not a tunnel=building_passage. I see the flag as a false positive, but have used a layer tag to fix it instead.
48126794
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-04-25 14:17
12017-04-25 14:40chadbunn
♦4
Thank you.
22017-04-25 20:29chadbunn
♦4
This area has been verified and the dog park can be seen on Mapillary.
48101990
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-04-24 20:11
12017-04-24 22:56chadbunn
♦4
How do you know this is fictional? I live here and will verify, but want to know how you were able to determine its authenticity.
22017-04-25 14:23DannyAiquipa Hey there ! Chadbunn I have reverted my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48126794
48101874
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-04-24 20:05
12017-04-25 12:43chillly
♦819
Why did you delete the pond? There is a pond there, not quite where the new mapper put it, but that's a newbie mistake. Does it really deserve to be deleted? I think this is heavy-handed
22017-04-25 14:08DannyAiquipa Hi Chilly, I deleted this pond based on Satellite imagery, because it does not show clearly, but I will revert my changeset if this is convenient for you.
32017-04-25 14:10DannyAiquipa https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48126491
47943165
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-04-19 15:29
12017-04-19 19:28vramirez122000
♦43
Hello. What was the purpose of this revert?
22017-04-19 19:42DannyAiquipa Hey there! I maked a mistake, i wanted delete 2 parks that do not show up in satellite imagery.
Thanks for your comment, I have reverted my changeset Sorry for the confusion and thanks for flagging this.
Best
Danny
45900273
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-02-07 22:38
12017-03-21 23:03PierZen
♦262
Voies temporaires lors de travaux routiers ne doivent pas etre ajoutées comme bretelles d'autoroute.

Road maintenance temporary lines should not be added as motorway links.
22017-03-21 23:20DannyAiquipa Hi PierZen, i will revert my changeset ,thanks for your comment! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47054005
46572815
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-03-04 13:41
12017-03-08 01:06FTA
♦201
Hi dannykath,
Is this the only changeset of rimantsjana that you reverted? I am trying to remove all the fictitious edits but am getting a few conflicts for some that have been reverted--it'd be a great help to know which ones have already been done.
Best,
Ethan aka FTA with the DWG
22017-03-08 03:42DannyAiquipa Hi Ethan, I reverted around 17 changesets from this user, I think cause more conflicts , if you have any question, please can you write me again ?
Regards
Danny
32017-03-08 03:44FTA
♦201
Thanks, Danny--good to know. It looks like some other people have reverted other changes too. So I am going to check each object and make sure at least someone else has touched them since the original edits.
Thanks!
Ethan
46525001
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-03-02 15:29
12017-03-02 20:17DannyAiquipa Sorry for my bing changeset, i was validating a big changeset , I will be more careful
45728780
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-02-01 22:11
12017-02-02 18:09dchiles
♦24
Why were the two buildings along Park Avenue deleted?
Related: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/878198
http://osmcha.mapbox.com/45728780/
22017-02-02 18:49DannyAiquipa Hi thanks for pointing this out, I'm not sure how this happened, however I will add those buildings again. Regards.
32017-02-02 18:54DannyAiquipa https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45756249
42017-02-07 22:41dchiles
♦24
👍🏻
45488007
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-01-25 19:43
12017-01-26 09:21oba510
♦256
Did you mean to remove the name when you deleted and re-drew this building? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/348756169
22017-01-26 15:06DannyAiquipa Hi, Thanks for your comment , sorry for my mistake, I have fixed my changeset .
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45514015
45274871
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-01-18 16:53
12017-01-19 09:19oba510
♦256
Hi, you've added a couple of ways in a parking lot, but tagged them as highway=residential. In general, these should be tagged as highway=service with appropriate service=* tags (eg: service=parking_aisle for parking aisles)
22017-01-20 15:18DannyAiquipa Hey there!
Thank you for bringing this issue to my notice. I didn't realize about the commercial buildings that are around this area, so I retagged the highways.
Thanks again!
44901044
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2017-01-04 15:19
12017-01-11 07:14nvk
♦13
Looks like a bad relations edit that turned the old `natural=wood` tag into a `landuse=reservoir` tag, resulting in a huge lake showing up where before it was forest?
22017-01-11 07:15nvk
♦13
New name to that effect was also added, probably around 38.7229602,-120.5654347. Maybe an unsuccessful polygon punch?
32017-01-11 07:22nvk
♦13
Attempt to fix in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45069739
42017-01-18 21:30DannyAiquipa Hey there ! Thanks for your fix , I will be more careful .
52017-01-18 21:56nvk
♦13
No worries :) It was really confusing in iD to fix this, the user flow there is not intuitive – and I think I would have made the same edit funky edit and 2nd round of fixing!

I had to know ahead of time there was a rendering bug in iD, and know that by creating another relation for th...
41803382
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-08-30 14:30
12016-12-23 19:29pnorman
♦317
When I was last here, the road was oneway. Has this changed?
22017-01-02 20:35DannyAiquipa Hi Excuse me for the late reply, yes you are right , i have fixed my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44855226
Thanks for your review
42506503
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-09-28 22:28
12016-09-29 13:52Littlebtc
♦61
Refined:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42519296
22016-11-29 22:49DannyAiquipa thanks for your correction, I will be more careful
32614876
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2015-07-13 21:48
12016-11-03 16:54Paul_012
♦112
This changeset has been reverted because it removed correct data.
22016-11-29 22:48DannyAiquipa Hey there , thanks for your correction!
38600444
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-04-15 19:20
12016-08-22 15:23d1g
♦274
Very timely response and well commented!

Thank you for the feedback!

I always count self-reverts as constructive edits. It is clear that person cares about correct data more than big edit counts and 0 validation warnings :)

Please tell new users to use noexit=yes tags. Many of us weren...
22016-11-29 22:47DannyAiquipa thanks for your comment, I will do
44014136
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-11-28 18:30
12016-11-29 04:18nevw
♦1,978
Hi
There is no way between Pinevale Place and Woodlight Street, except by the footway.
The tool 'Connecting motorable roads using #to-fix' is not always correct and only a guide that there 'may' be a problem and on satellite imagery it looks like there may be a block too. The ...
22016-11-29 14:03DannyAiquipa Hey there!
thanks for your correction!
Best regards
Danny
32016-11-29 14:04DannyAiquipa Hey there!
thanks for your correction!
Best regards
Danny
42327173
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-09-21 15:45
12016-09-21 23:38DavidKewley
♦195
It seems clear to me that deleting the oneway=yes tag from Lion Country as was done here is NOT the right way to fix whatever To-Fix was flagging as an error. Looking at the traffic flow, the sections of Lion Country from Irvine Center to Meadows Way are clearly one-way (one heading in was mis-edite...
22016-09-23 15:16DannyAiquipa Hey there David , I fixing a changeset, please
see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42376732 for more details , thanks for your comment !
32016-09-23 19:24DavidKewley
♦195
Thank you for the adjustment! Looks as reasonably good as we can do without a survey. Also, this is an event (e.g. concert) parking lot area for Irvine Meadows Ampitheatre, so I bet its use varies a lot. The ampitheatre is planned to close after this fall, and apartments will be built here, so proba...
42016-09-23 19:25DavidKewley
♦195
Thank you! This is good enough given that it is a parking area for a concert ampitheatre that will close after this fall and be turned into apartments.
42299430
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-09-20 13:55
12016-09-20 14:53Borut@OSM
♦48
Hi Danny! In this particular case it can, but must not be correct. The previous version was obviously not OK, but I suspect that maybe the street is partly one way - maybe up to the crossing. However, I do not have local knowledge and have not consulted imagery yet. Regards, Borut
22016-09-20 15:39DannyAiquipa Hey Borut! thanks for your comment, I have reverted my changeset and I have also left a note instead
42183064
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-09-15 18:44
12016-09-16 13:28Nakaner
♦3,147
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=609026#p609026
22016-09-16 14:02DannyAiquipa Thanks for your fixing , I will be more careful
40745669
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-07-14 17:36
12016-07-15 14:57SomeoneElse
♦13,368
Hi,
Please try and restrict changeset size to at least less than one continent. Other mappers have mentioned this before (e.g. on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39069408) but its still happening.
Also, please do use meaningful changeset comments - "Closing broken polygons" and s...
22016-08-05 14:20DannyAiquipa I do not know why exactly this happens. It may happen when my internet connection is having connectivity issues. I will be careful when I am seeing network issues, and try to observe the exact cause.

39934579
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-06-10 16:39
12016-06-11 02:44mattchn
♦37
The lane count (lanes=5) was correct, the mistake was in the count of forward and backward lanes. I have changed this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327095053/history
22016-08-03 20:12DannyAiquipa Thanks for your review !
39069408
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-05-03 15:46
12016-05-03 17:16trigpoint
♦2,373
Hi
I have commented on one of you changesets on this same issue before, but you did not respond.
Please keep your changes to sensible areas, close and start a new changeset for each area, for example this one should be a minimum of four separate changesets.
Large areas such as this make review by...
22016-05-03 23:59DannyAiquipa Hello Phill, I'll be more careful , thanks for your comment.
32016-05-08 09:41SomeoneElse
♦13,368
Please don't just say "I'll be more careful" and then just carry on as normal the very next day, as you did in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39105735 .

If you're connecting two roads, such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302319853 and http://www.openstreetmap...
42016-07-15 14:58SomeoneElse
♦13,368
This is still happening. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40745669 .
52016-07-15 17:51DannyAiquipa Hello Andy, It could happen because I had internet connection issues yesterday.
39935083
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-06-10 16:56
12016-06-13 01:50mattchn
♦37
Please check with Bing imagery, the current representation seems wrong. Maybe wrong forward/backward tags?
22016-06-24 15:29DannyAiquipa Hey there, thanks four your feedback ! I have already fix the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40264382
39935935
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-06-10 17:29
12016-06-10 23:36rickmastfan67
♦234
There was NOTHING wrong here. The 'none' part is there to indicate there is a lane splitting into 2 lanes from one. Taking out the 'none' tells everybody to go to the left into the brand new lane. Please look at the satellite imagery before editing and look at adjacent ways to...
22016-06-10 23:53DannyAiquipa Hey there!, Thanks for your comment , I have reverted this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39944269
39132667
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-05-06 00:31
12016-05-07 23:52FTA
♦201
Hi, is there any way you can confine edits across the world to separate changesets? It's difficult see what exactly was changed when the bbox covers nearly all longitudes.
22016-05-10 15:17DannyAiquipa Hey! I was fixing short issues. However, I think because of the internet speed issue, I could have mistaken some layers. I will be careful next time. Thanks for your feedback
39108650
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-05-04 22:17
12016-05-04 22:31rickmastfan67
♦234
Is it possible that you could try to keep these types of changesets limited to one continent or even smaller areas? It makes it sometimes impossible for local mappers to double check if your changes are correct since the OSM RSS feeds give any changeset that has a bounding box that enters a smaller ...
22016-05-05 12:38DannyAiquipa Hey there , I do not know happened exactly , but I will be more careful, Thanks for your comment
39043844
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-05-02 16:20
12016-05-03 12:37SomeoneElse
♦13,368
While " Fixing major highways that overlap with minor highways" does explain what you were changing it doesn't say where, or what the source was, and this changeset is huge!
22016-05-04 00:03DannyAiquipa hello Andy , I do not know happened exactly, but I'll be more careful.
39083925
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-05-03 22:26
12016-05-03 22:52rickmastfan67
♦234
Please make smaller changesets. When changesets span accross the ocean, the bounding box it creates makes it hard to keep track of local changes in my area with my RSS feed of changesets, even if nothing was changed in my local area. If you need to do big changesets like this, please limit them to...
22016-05-03 23:57DannyAiquipa Hello! thanks for your comment, I'll be more careful
38951616
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-04-28 14:09
12016-04-29 16:07trigpoint
♦2,373
Please keep your changes within sensible areas, large areas such as this make peer review by local mapper very difficult.
Thanks Phil
22016-05-03 23:52DannyAiquipa Hello Phill, I'll be more careful , thanks for your comment.
38477263
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-04-11 14:43
12016-04-11 19:59LLlypuk82
♦104
Please, do not create a common node, it is a feature for correct routing.
22016-04-29 19:23DannyAiquipa I'll be more careful, thanks for your feedback.
26634400
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2014-11-08 04:18
12014-11-13 11:45naoliv
♦1,783
You have duplicated some nodes (and then some boundaries were left unclosed) in this changeset. It's good to validate the data with JOSM before uploading it.
22016-04-29 19:19dannykath_labuildings
♦1
thanks for yoru comment Naoliv, I'll be careful
32016-04-29 19:20DannyAiquipa thanks for your comment Naoliv.
I'll be more careful
38569721
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-04-14 21:03
12016-04-15 19:00mavl
♦76,061
Hello. Please, give me one good reason why two roads are connected?
22016-04-15 19:31DannyAiquipa Thanks for your feedback, I think these ways should be interesected so i did it , but I've already reverted this changeset , more details in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38600444
32016-04-15 19:48mavl
♦76,061
Thank you for revert.

These two roads have no common points. The first road [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26723955] is on the ground. The second road [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376193872] is on an embankment (there is a bridge). The embankment has height about 4 meters. A person can...
37876267
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-03-16 16:26
12016-04-07 09:27Владимир К
♦1,775
Hello!
I see, you added nodes 4055312665 4055312664 and so on.
They are right for validator, but they make routing wrong.
For example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74396%2C52.39203%3B55.74417%2C52.39199
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_c...
22016-04-07 15:41DannyAiquipa Hello! Thanks for your feedback!
I think it's necessary to connect those major highways,
I've already reverted my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38384184
36682860
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2016-01-19 16:09
12016-01-30 22:23Harry Cutts
♦6
Nice work! FYI, I had to manually revert your changes to Reflection Way and its buildings (changeset 36907072), as the Bing imagery is out of date in that location. The buildings shown have since been demolished and replaced.
22016-02-01 13:41DannyAiquipa Hey Harry,
Thanks for contributing and fixing those demolished buildings.
31638424
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2015-06-01 15:36
12015-06-08 11:58SomeoneElse
♦13,368
Did you mention the "problem" that you fixed here to either SK53 or will_p who were the previous mappers of the ways concerned? Given that they're both on-the-ground mappers I'd be very surprised if the previous situation was incorrect. Perhaps rather than diving in and trying ...
22015-11-16 14:16DannyAiquipa Hello ! I have reverted this changeset , thanks for your comment. I will be more careful
32015-11-16 14:44DannyAiquipa Hi, I was working with the tool unconnected minor, which is to add intersections of streets, in this case lacked the streets intersect, I intersected, thanks for your comment, next time ask you local mappers first
42015-11-16 16:33DannyAiquipa Please to see more details about unconnected minor https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/106
35319008
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2015-11-14 23:23
12015-11-16 14:56DannyAiquipa (https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/8483644/11184647/e0f9a4c6-8c46-11e5-8f21-cf370f2b1870.png)
33101616
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2015-08-04 15:30
12015-08-07 17:14SomeoneElse
♦13,368
Would it be possible to describe what the "impossible angle" was before here? http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=33101616 doesn't really show a lot of difference. The resulting roundabout still looks a bit overnoded and too big for the imagery.
22015-11-16 14:10DannyAiquipa Hello!
I Have reverted this changeset, please to see more details please follow here http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33186281
33186281
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2015-08-07 18:05
12015-08-08 17:06SomeoneElse
♦13,368
Thanks - that looks much more like the right size.
22015-11-16 14:02DannyAiquipa Thanks for your comment.
32476765
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2015-07-07 16:59
12015-10-28 18:00skorasaurus
♦215
Hi, these roads don't go as far you've edited them. I've driven past them numerous times. I had them at the correct length in an earlier version and now fixed them in this changeset.http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34932290
22015-10-28 19:42DannyAiquipa Hello!
Thanks for updating the information about this way.
32743999
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2015-07-20 00:20
12015-10-17 06:10GerdP
♦2,751
please review:
Bing shows very nice roads here
22015-10-17 20:55DannyAiquipa Hello , thanks for your review, i changed this tag , please review this changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34701334.
Greetings
Danny
32015-10-17 21:10GerdP
♦2,751
thanks for the reply. I think surface is
asphalt, not grass?
42015-10-20 15:52DannyAiquipa Hello, I changed this tag , see this changeset
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34758569
34329785
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2015-09-29 16:34
12015-09-29 16:39ikiya
♦27
Please stop mass editing.
Please explain what you are doing for Japan OSM community.
22015-09-29 17:34DannyAiquipa Hello Ikiya, thanks for your feedback , I am aligning major roads (primary, secondary, trunk) based on GIS Imagery ort (http://cyberjapandata.gsi.go.jp/xyz/ort/{z}/{x}/{y}.jpg
32015-09-30 06:18pnorman
♦317
There's nothing wrong with improving alignment, but before continuing this large-scale edit, can you communicate with the Japanese community on the talk-ja@ list about what you'd like to do, and seek their feedback?

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
42015-09-30 10:42ikiya
♦27
Thanks for your comment.
Today there was a detailed explanation about the cleanup project.
(Japan Community mailing lists)
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2015-September/009083.html
52015-09-30 20:41DannyAiquipa Hello Ikiya, thanks for your feedback @planemad told me he has been in touch, I am aligning major roads (primary, secondary, trunk) - details here - https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/120
34235143
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2015-09-24 21:28
12015-09-24 21:30Rub21
♦30
Test, podría responder este mensaje ni bien lo reciba.
Gracias.
22015-09-24 21:34DannyAiquipa ya :)
32679643
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2015-07-16 17:19
12015-07-16 17:42Yorvik Prestigitator
♦151
Why have you removed the oneway tag??
This is the exit from the service station forecourt and motorists are not allowed to enter the forecourt via this way as indicated by local signage.
22015-07-16 18:01DannyAiquipa Hi, I am sorry, I reverted this changeset
32015-07-16 18:10Yorvik Prestigitator
♦151
Thank you :)
32550147
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2015-07-10 18:17
12015-07-11 22:32ij_
♦34
Please don't remove oneway=yes just like that or did you visit the place and checked that it really is a dead-end? You're very likely wrong even if you might have tried to interpret imagery. My guess (non-verified on ground) is that one can drive around that building below the upper loadin...
22015-07-12 23:42DannyAiquipa Hello! I am sorry, I'll be careful to next time
32080181
by DannyAiquipa
@ 2015-06-19 17:17
12015-06-19 18:43zeromap
♦81
Hi, dannykath! Thanks for your interest in improving OpenStreetMap. You've changed the type of way that I've verified using local knowledge and a ground survey. A good practice is to check the history of an object, especially if you are making changes based on aerial imagery and not a grou...
22015-06-19 22:51DannyAiquipa Thanks for your review, zeromap!