| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53251269 by dannykath | 1 | 2018-05-10 20:26:44 UTC | carciofo | Hi, can you specify the source for this turn restriction? There is a turning lane on the left, so something is wrong... Thanks in advance for the info |
| 56834826 by dannykath | 1 | 2018-03-04 17:16:34 UTC | PierZen | To display HV Power lines on infrastructure maps such as OpenInfraMap, voltage should be added. |
| 49573511 by dannykath | 1 | 2018-02-23 12:41:10 UTC | zaizone | Hi dannykath ! I've seen that you tagged some of my contributions as a bad edits in OSMCHA and reverted it. This node has been deleted because there was a duplicate of that town, see : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3300965576https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/921507120Could you please fix... |
| 49573573 by dannykath | 1 | 2018-02-23 12:39:39 UTC | zaizone | Hi dannykath ! I've seen that you tagged some of my contributions as a bad edits in OSMCHA and reverted it. This node has been deleted because there was a duplicate of that town, see : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3300968250https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/921563456Could you please fix... |
| 49282798 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-12-10 13:03:03 UTC | Sylwke3100 | Why, if the bus stop location is wrong? |
| 2 | 2017-12-10 13:06:22 UTC | Sylwke3100 | Please look https://rj.kzkgop.com.pl/mapa/160759/ | |
| 51437213 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-09-27 11:08:38 UTC | carciofo | Hi, regarding the cross-over segments on I-75 which you and other Mapbox mappers are adding, please note that access=permissive is not correct for these segments. They are signed "emergency vehicles only" which goes against the definition of permissive, which implies that access has been g... |
| 2 | 2017-11-30 14:26:06 UTC | dannykath_peruimport | Hi Carcifofo, thanks for flagging this, I deleted my changes, thanks for your comment! | |
| 3 | 2017-11-30 14:50:54 UTC | dannykath | Hi Carcifofo, thanks for flagging this, I deleted my changes, thanks for your comment! | |
| 4 | 2017-11-30 14:51:28 UTC | dannykath | Sorry for my double comment, I used my wrong account! | |
| 49148167 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-11-05 11:45:56 UTC | Sanniu | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320363804 - look like you created zigzagged, self-intersection road here, can it be fixed/reverted? |
| 2 | 2017-11-05 16:31:07 UTC | SafwatHalaby | This is partially the fault of the bus stop update. Changeset 49148167 glued stops to the road, and yesterday the bot bus stop update moved those stops, dragging the road along with it. I've fixed this here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53532857 | |
| 3 | 2017-11-05 16:54:33 UTC | SafwatHalaby | Forum post:https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=671314#p671314Fixing entire Israel:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53533478 | |
| 4 | 2017-11-05 17:52:42 UTC | SafwatHalaby | Entire list of fix changesets:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53532857.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53532932.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53533478.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53533734 | |
| 5 | 2017-11-06 05:41:17 UTC | SafwatHalaby | ...and:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53539624.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53545146 | |
| 51236785 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-08-27 11:12:09 UTC | mueschel | Hi,http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7484856Is this a restrictions for cars higher than the given value? Then it should be ... @ height > 13'6"We're referring to the actual size of the vehicle, not a restriction like 'maxheight'.Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2017-08-27 16:19:49 UTC | dannykath | Hi, mueschel! Thank you for you attentiveness. Of course, in this case it is forbidden to drive cars higher than 13'6'', not equal to 13'6''.https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7484856I fixed TR according to you comment. Best regards Danny | |
| 44601324 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-08-04 11:36:10 UTC | Paul_012 | I've reverted this edit. A motorway passing through a toll booth is obviously not a tunnel=building_passage. I see the flag as a false positive, but have used a layer tag to fix it instead. |
| 48126794 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-04-25 14:40:04 UTC | chadbunn | Thank you. |
| 2 | 2017-04-25 20:29:09 UTC | chadbunn | This area has been verified and the dog park can be seen on Mapillary. | |
| 48101990 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-04-24 22:56:09 UTC | chadbunn | How do you know this is fictional? I live here and will verify, but want to know how you were able to determine its authenticity. |
| 2 | 2017-04-25 14:23:32 UTC | dannykath | Hey there ! Chadbunn I have reverted my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48126794 | |
| 48101874 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-04-25 12:43:36 UTC | chillly | Why did you delete the pond? There is a pond there, not quite where the new mapper put it, but that's a newbie mistake. Does it really deserve to be deleted? I think this is heavy-handed |
| 2 | 2017-04-25 14:08:50 UTC | dannykath | Hi Chilly, I deleted this pond based on Satellite imagery, because it does not show clearly, but I will revert my changeset if this is convenient for you. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-25 14:10:04 UTC | dannykath | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48126491 | |
| 47943165 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-04-19 19:28:43 UTC | vramirez122000 | Hello. What was the purpose of this revert? |
| 2 | 2017-04-19 19:42:51 UTC | dannykath | Hey there! I maked a mistake, i wanted delete 2 parks that do not show up in satellite imagery.Thanks for your comment, I have reverted my changeset Sorry for the confusion and thanks for flagging this. Best Danny | |
| 45900273 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-03-21 23:03:54 UTC | PierZen | Voies temporaires lors de travaux routiers ne doivent pas etre ajoutées comme bretelles d'autoroute.Road maintenance temporary lines should not be added as motorway links. |
| 2 | 2017-03-21 23:20:28 UTC | dannykath | Hi PierZen, i will revert my changeset ,thanks for your comment! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47054005 | |
| 46572815 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-03-08 01:06:43 UTC | FTA | Hi dannykath,Is this the only changeset of rimantsjana that you reverted? I am trying to remove all the fictitious edits but am getting a few conflicts for some that have been reverted--it'd be a great help to know which ones have already been done.Best,Ethan aka FTA with the DWG |
| 2 | 2017-03-08 03:42:22 UTC | dannykath | Hi Ethan, I reverted around 17 changesets from this user, I think cause more conflicts , if you have any question, please can you write me again ?Regards Danny | |
| 3 | 2017-03-08 03:44:13 UTC | FTA | Thanks, Danny--good to know. It looks like some other people have reverted other changes too. So I am going to check each object and make sure at least someone else has touched them since the original edits.Thanks!Ethan | |
| 46525001 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-03-02 20:17:05 UTC | dannykath | Sorry for my bing changeset, i was validating a big changeset , I will be more careful |
| 45728780 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-02-02 18:09:46 UTC | dchiles | Why were the two buildings along Park Avenue deleted? Related: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/878198http://osmcha.mapbox.com/45728780/ |
| 2 | 2017-02-02 18:49:19 UTC | dannykath | Hi thanks for pointing this out, I'm not sure how this happened, however I will add those buildings again. Regards. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-02 18:54:36 UTC | dannykath | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45756249 | |
| 4 | 2017-02-07 22:41:54 UTC | dchiles | 👍🏻 | |
| 45488007 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-01-26 09:21:27 UTC | oba510 | Did you mean to remove the name when you deleted and re-drew this building? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/348756169 |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 15:06:38 UTC | dannykath | Hi, Thanks for your comment , sorry for my mistake, I have fixed my changeset .http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45514015 | |
| 45274871 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-01-19 09:19:49 UTC | oba510 | Hi, you've added a couple of ways in a parking lot, but tagged them as highway=residential. In general, these should be tagged as highway=service with appropriate service=* tags (eg: service=parking_aisle for parking aisles) |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 15:18:51 UTC | dannykath | Hey there!Thank you for bringing this issue to my notice. I didn't realize about the commercial buildings that are around this area, so I retagged the highways. Thanks again! | |
| 44901044 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-01-11 07:14:06 UTC | nvk | Looks like a bad relations edit that turned the old `natural=wood` tag into a `landuse=reservoir` tag, resulting in a huge lake showing up where before it was forest? |
| 2 | 2017-01-11 07:15:37 UTC | nvk | New name to that effect was also added, probably around 38.7229602,-120.5654347. Maybe an unsuccessful polygon punch? | |
| 3 | 2017-01-11 07:22:52 UTC | nvk | Attempt to fix in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45069739 | |
| 4 | 2017-01-18 21:30:36 UTC | dannykath | Hey there ! Thanks for your fix , I will be more careful . | |
| 5 | 2017-01-18 21:56:42 UTC | nvk | No worries :) It was really confusing in iD to fix this, the user flow there is not intuitive – and I think I would have made the same edit funky edit and 2nd round of fixing!I had to know ahead of time there was a rendering bug in iD, and know that by creating another relation for th... | |
| 41803382 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-12-23 19:29:35 UTC | pnorman | When I was last here, the road was oneway. Has this changed? |
| 2 | 2017-01-02 20:35:27 UTC | dannykath | Hi Excuse me for the late reply, yes you are right , i have fixed my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44855226Thanks for your review | |
| 42506503 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-09-29 13:52:02 UTC | Littlebtc | Refined:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42519296 |
| 2 | 2016-11-29 22:49:18 UTC | dannykath | thanks for your correction, I will be more careful | |
| 32614876 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-11-03 16:54:44 UTC | Paul_012 | This changeset has been reverted because it removed correct data. |
| 2 | 2016-11-29 22:48:21 UTC | dannykath | Hey there , thanks for your correction! | |
| 38600444 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-08-22 15:23:21 UTC | d1g | Very timely response and well commented! Thank you for the feedback!I always count self-reverts as constructive edits. It is clear that person cares about correct data more than big edit counts and 0 validation warnings :)Please tell new users to use noexit=yes tags. Many of us weren't u... |
| 2 | 2016-11-29 22:47:20 UTC | dannykath | thanks for your comment, I will do | |
| 44014136 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-11-29 04:18:13 UTC | nevw | HiThere is no way between Pinevale Place and Woodlight Street, except by the footway.The tool 'Connecting motorable roads using #to-fix' is not always correct and only a guide that there 'may' be a problem and on satellite imagery it looks like there may be a block too. The driveways do not joi... |
| 2 | 2016-11-29 14:03:47 UTC | dannykath | Hey there! thanks for your correction!Best regards Danny | |
| 3 | 2016-11-29 14:04:13 UTC | dannykath | Hey there! thanks for your correction!Best regards Danny | |
| 42327173 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-09-21 23:38:41 UTC | DavidKewley | It seems clear to me that deleting the oneway=yes tag from Lion Country as was done here is NOT the right way to fix whatever To-Fix was flagging as an error. Looking at the traffic flow, the sections of Lion Country from Irvine Center to Meadows Way are clearly one-way (one heading in was mis-edite... |
| 2 | 2016-09-23 15:16:44 UTC | dannykath | Hey there David , I fixing a changeset, please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42376732 for more details , thanks for your comment ! | |
| 3 | 2016-09-23 19:24:25 UTC | DavidKewley | Thank you for the adjustment! Looks as reasonably good as we can do without a survey. Also, this is an event (e.g. concert) parking lot area for Irvine Meadows Ampitheatre, so I bet its use varies a lot. The ampitheatre is planned to close after this fall, and apartments will be built here, so proba... | |
| 4 | 2016-09-23 19:25:46 UTC | DavidKewley | Thank you! This is good enough given that it is a parking area for a concert ampitheatre that will close after this fall and be turned into apartments. | |
| 42299430 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-09-20 14:53:22 UTC | Borut@OSM | Hi Danny! In this particular case it can, but must not be correct. The previous version was obviously not OK, but I suspect that maybe the street is partly one way - maybe up to the crossing. However, I do not have local knowledge and have not consulted imagery yet. Regards, Borut |
| 2 | 2016-09-20 15:39:49 UTC | dannykath | Hey Borut! thanks for your comment, I have reverted my changeset and I have also left a note instead | |
| 42183064 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-09-16 13:28:55 UTC | Nakaner | http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=609026#p609026 |
| 2 | 2016-09-16 14:02:54 UTC | dannykath | Thanks for your fixing , I will be more careful | |
| 40745669 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-07-15 14:57:21 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,Please try and restrict changeset size to at least less than one continent. Other mappers have mentioned this before (e.g. on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39069408) but its still happening.Also, please do use meaningful changeset comments - "Closing broken polygons" and s... |
| 2 | 2016-08-05 14:20:38 UTC | dannykath | I do not know why exactly this happens. It may happen when my internet connection is having connectivity issues. I will be careful when I am seeing network issues, and try to observe the exact cause. | |
| 39934579 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-06-11 02:44:36 UTC | mattchn | The lane count (lanes=5) was correct, the mistake was in the count of forward and backward lanes. I have changed this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327095053/history |
| 2 | 2016-08-03 20:12:59 UTC | dannykath | Thanks for your review ! | |
| 39069408 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-05-03 17:16:26 UTC | trigpoint | HiI have commented on one of you changesets on this same issue before, but you did not respond.Please keep your changes to sensible areas, close and start a new changeset for each area, for example this one should be a minimum of four separate changesets.Large areas such as this make review by... |
| 2 | 2016-05-03 23:59:07 UTC | dannykath | Hello Phill, I'll be more careful , thanks for your comment. | |
| 3 | 2016-05-08 09:41:25 UTC | SomeoneElse | Please don't just say "I'll be more careful" and then just carry on as normal the very next day, as you did in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39105735 .If you're connecting two roads, such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302319853 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226723... | |
| 4 | 2016-07-15 14:58:57 UTC | SomeoneElse | This is still happening. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40745669 . | |
| 5 | 2016-07-15 17:51:04 UTC | dannykath | Hello Andy, It could happen because I had internet connection issues yesterday. | |
| 39935083 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-06-13 01:50:18 UTC | mattchn | Please check with Bing imagery, the current representation seems wrong. Maybe wrong forward/backward tags? |
| 2 | 2016-06-24 15:29:45 UTC | dannykath | Hey there, thanks four your feedback ! I have already fix the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40264382 | |
| 39935935 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-06-10 23:36:11 UTC | rickmastfan67 | There was NOTHING wrong here. The 'none' part is there to indicate there is a lane splitting into 2 lanes from one. Taking out the 'none' tells everybody to go to the left into the brand new lane. Please look at the satellite imagery before editing and look at adjacent ways too. This is ruining ... |
| 2 | 2016-06-10 23:53:54 UTC | dannykath | Hey there!, Thanks for your comment , I have reverted this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39944269 | |
| 39132667 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-05-07 23:52:25 UTC | FTA | Hi, is there any way you can confine edits across the world to separate changesets? It's difficult see what exactly was changed when the bbox covers nearly all longitudes. |
| 2 | 2016-05-10 15:17:51 UTC | dannykath | Hey! I was fixing short issues. However, I think because of the internet speed issue, I could have mistaken some layers. I will be careful next time. Thanks for your feedback | |
| 39108650 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-05-04 22:31:15 UTC | rickmastfan67 | Is it possible that you could try to keep these types of changesets limited to one continent or even smaller areas? It makes it sometimes impossible for local mappers to double check if your changes are correct since the OSM RSS feeds give any changeset that has a bounding box that enters a smaller ... |
| 2 | 2016-05-05 12:38:58 UTC | dannykath | Hey there , I do not know happened exactly , but I will be more careful, Thanks for your comment | |
| 39043844 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-05-03 12:37:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | While " Fixing major highways that overlap with minor highways" does explain what you were changing it doesn't say where, or what the source was, and this changeset is huge! |
| 2 | 2016-05-04 00:03:34 UTC | dannykath | hello Andy , I do not know happened exactly, but I'll be more careful. | |
| 39083925 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-05-03 22:52:04 UTC | rickmastfan67 | Please make smaller changesets. When changesets span accross the ocean, the bounding box it creates makes it hard to keep track of local changes in my area with my RSS feed of changesets, even if nothing was changed in my local area. If you need to do big changesets like this, please limit them to... |
| 2 | 2016-05-03 23:57:45 UTC | dannykath | Hello! thanks for your comment, I'll be more careful | |
| 38951616 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-04-29 16:07:42 UTC | trigpoint | Please keep your changes within sensible areas, large areas such as this make peer review by local mapper very difficult.Thanks Phil |
| 2 | 2016-05-03 23:52:27 UTC | dannykath | Hello Phill, I'll be more careful , thanks for your comment. | |
| 38477263 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-04-11 19:59:25 UTC | LLlypuk82 | Please, do not create a common node, it is a feature for correct routing. |
| 2 | 2016-04-29 19:23:00 UTC | dannykath | I'll be more careful, thanks for your feedback. | |
| 26634400 by dannykath | 1 | 2014-11-13 11:45:46 UTC | naoliv | You have duplicated some nodes (and then some boundaries were left unclosed) in this changeset. It's good to validate the data with JOSM before uploading it. |
| 2 | 2016-04-29 19:19:53 UTC | dannykath_labuildings | thanks for yoru comment Naoliv, I'll be careful | |
| 3 | 2016-04-29 19:20:41 UTC | dannykath | thanks for your comment Naoliv. I'll be more careful | |
| 38569721 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-04-15 19:00:03 UTC | mavl | Hello. Please, give me one good reason why two roads are connected? |
| 2 | 2016-04-15 19:31:12 UTC | dannykath | Thanks for your feedback, I think these ways should be interesected so i did it , but I've already reverted this changeset , more details in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38600444 | |
| 3 | 2016-04-15 19:48:25 UTC | mavl | Thank you for revert. These two roads have no common points. The first road [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26723955] is on the ground. The second road [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376193872] is on an embankment (there is a bridge). The embankment has height about 4 meters. A person can... | |
| 37876267 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-04-07 09:27:21 UTC | Владимир К | Hello!I see, you added nodes 4055312665 4055312664 and so on.They are right for validator, but they make routing wrong.For examplehttp://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74396%2C52.39203%3B55.74417%2C52.39199http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_c... |
| 2 | 2016-04-07 15:41:43 UTC | dannykath | Hello! Thanks for your feedback!I think it's necessary to connect those major highways, I've already reverted my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38384184 | |
| 36682860 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-01-30 22:23:15 UTC | Harry Cutts | Nice work! FYI, I had to manually revert your changes to Reflection Way and its buildings (changeset 36907072), as the Bing imagery is out of date in that location. The buildings shown have since been demolished and replaced. |
| 2 | 2016-02-01 13:41:56 UTC | dannykath | Hey Harry,Thanks for contributing and fixing those demolished buildings. | |
| 31638424 by dannykath | 1 | 2015-06-08 11:58:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Did you mention the "problem" that you fixed here to either SK53 or will_p who were the previous mappers of the ways concerned? Given that they're both on-the-ground mappers I'd be very surprised if the previous situation was incorrect. Perhaps rather than diving in and trying to "f... |
| 2 | 2015-11-16 14:16:40 UTC | dannykath | Hello ! I have reverted this changeset , thanks for your comment. I will be more careful | |
| 3 | 2015-11-16 14:44:42 UTC | dannykath | Hi, I was working with the tool unconnected minor, which is to add intersections of streets, in this case lacked the streets intersect, I intersected, thanks for your comment, next time ask you local mappers first | |
| 4 | 2015-11-16 16:33:12 UTC | dannykath | Please to see more details about unconnected minor https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/106 | |
| 35319008 by dannykath | 1 | 2015-11-16 14:56:45 UTC | dannykath | (https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/8483644/11184647/e0f9a4c6-8c46-11e5-8f21-cf370f2b1870.png) |
| 33101616 by dannykath | 1 | 2015-08-07 17:14:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | Would it be possible to describe what the "impossible angle" was before here? http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=33101616 doesn't really show a lot of difference. The resulting roundabout still looks a bit overnoded and too big for the imagery. |
| 2 | 2015-11-16 14:10:51 UTC | dannykath | Hello! I Have reverted this changeset, please to see more details please follow here http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33186281 | |
| 33186281 by dannykath | 1 | 2015-08-08 17:06:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks - that looks much more like the right size. |
| 2 | 2015-11-16 14:02:40 UTC | dannykath | Thanks for your comment. | |
| 32476765 by dannykath | 1 | 2015-10-28 18:00:57 UTC | skorasaurus | Hi, these roads don't go as far you've edited them. I've driven past them numerous times. I had them at the correct length in an earlier version and now fixed them in this changeset.http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34932290 |
| 2 | 2015-10-28 19:42:05 UTC | dannykath | Hello! Thanks for updating the information about this way. | |
| 32743999 by dannykath | 1 | 2015-10-17 06:10:32 UTC | GerdP | please review:Bing shows very nice roads here |
| 2 | 2015-10-17 20:55:05 UTC | dannykath | Hello , thanks for your review, i changed this tag , please review this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34701334.GreetingsDanny | |
| 3 | 2015-10-17 21:10:39 UTC | GerdP | thanks for the reply. I think surface isasphalt, not grass? | |
| 4 | 2015-10-20 15:52:42 UTC | dannykath | Hello, I changed this tag , see this changesethttp://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34758569 | |
| 34329785 by dannykath | 1 | 2015-09-29 16:39:45 UTC | ikiya | Please stop mass editing.Please explain what you are doing for Japan OSM community. |
| 2 | 2015-09-29 17:34:59 UTC | dannykath | Hello Ikiya, thanks for your feedback , I am aligning major roads (primary, secondary, trunk) based on GIS Imagery ort (http://cyberjapandata.gsi.go.jp/xyz/ort/{z}/{x}/{y}.jpg | |
| 3 | 2015-09-30 06:18:53 UTC | pnorman | There's nothing wrong with improving alignment, but before continuing this large-scale edit, can you communicate with the Japanese community on the talk-ja@ list about what you'd like to do, and seek their feedback?Paul NormanFor the Data Working Group | |
| 4 | 2015-09-30 10:42:10 UTC | ikiya | Thanks for your comment.Today there was a detailed explanation about the cleanup project.(Japan Community mailing lists)https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2015-September/009083.html | |
| 5 | 2015-09-30 20:41:04 UTC | dannykath | Hello Ikiya, thanks for your feedback @planemad told me he has been in touch, I am aligning major roads (primary, secondary, trunk) - details here - https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/120 | |
| 34235143 by dannykath | 1 | 2015-09-24 21:30:26 UTC | Rub21 | Test, podría responder este mensaje ni bien lo reciba.Gracias. |
| 2 | 2015-09-24 21:34:58 UTC | dannykath | ya :) | |
| 32679643 by dannykath | 1 | 2015-07-16 17:42:27 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | Why have you removed the oneway tag?? This is the exit from the service station forecourt and motorists are not allowed to enter the forecourt via this way as indicated by local signage. |
| 2 | 2015-07-16 18:01:50 UTC | dannykath | Hi, I am sorry, I reverted this changeset | |
| 3 | 2015-07-16 18:10:44 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | Thank you :) | |
| 32550147 by dannykath | 1 | 2015-07-11 22:32:05 UTC | ij_ | Please don't remove oneway=yes just like that or did you visit the place and checked that it really is a dead-end? You're very likely wrong even if you might have tried to interpret imagery. My guess (non-verified on ground) is that one can drive around that building below the upper loading/parking ... |
| 2 | 2015-07-12 23:42:03 UTC | dannykath | Hello! I am sorry, I'll be careful to next time | |
| 32080181 by dannykath | 1 | 2015-06-19 18:43:37 UTC | zeromap | Hi, dannykath! Thanks for your interest in improving OpenStreetMap. You've changed the type of way that I've verified using local knowledge and a ground survey. A good practice is to check the history of an object, especially if you are making changes based on aerial imagery and not a ground survey.... |
| 2 | 2015-06-19 22:51:03 UTC | dannykath | Thanks for your review, zeromap! | |